Hi Fellow  Divers and Friends of the Houston HammerHeads,

There are?10  announcements in this email:
?

???Monthly Socials  -?April 26, May 31, June 28
???CORAL Reef Alliance  Slideshow (during April 26 social)
??? You are Invited to  Join
???Dive In Day - May 20
?? Local Diving at Balmorhea  State Park - May 26-28
?? Sea Space - June 9 &  10
??? Local Diving, South  Padre Liberty Ships - June 23-24
??? U/W Photography  Guest Speaker (during June 28 social)
?? Best US Dive Spot  Article
???Call for the  Military
??
???

If you have any questions or  need additional information, please email.

Best Wishes and  Fishes,
Kristi Foster
King Crab  (President)
_____________________________
MONTHLY  SOCIAL
The last Thursday of each month  (April 26,?May 31 and June 28)? is the date
of the monthly social at  Surfer's Paradise, (713-681-5100) located?across
from the theater in the  MarqE complex on I10 off of 610 (actual address is
7620  Katy Freeway) from 7:30 - 9:30 pm.? Tell the host/hostess  you're with
the HammerHeads - we'll be in the party room.?
____________________________
CORAL REEF ALLIANCE SLIDESHOW -  April 26
Kristi Foster will give the  slideshow presentation that CORAL has put
together as an environmental awareness  program.? This is available to the
public for community outreach and comes  with a script to help the
presenter.? You are invited to attend and learn  more about CORAL during the
April 26 monthly social.? ~30  minutes.
__________________________

YOU ARE INVITED TO  JOIN
The Houston HammerHeads has open  enrollment.? You are invited to join any
time throughout the year.?  Annual membership dues are only $20.? In return,
you get a club T-shirt,  stickers and decals (while supplies last) and
continued updates on diving events  in and around Houston.? Membership forms
are available at every social and  most other club functions.? For more
information, please contact Kristi  Foster at panacea1@swbell.net.
____________________________

DIVE-IN  DAY?- May 20
3rd Annual International Dive-In Day -  It's time to make history again!
Thousands of divers across the world will  invade beaches, rivers and lakes
in a bold attempt to break the World Record for  the largest group dive for
our 3rd Annual International Dive-In Day.? We  expect dives to take place in
more than 100 locations simultaneously all over  the world, making
International Dive in Day the World's biggest and most  significant dive
event.? The Houston Chapter will be diving at the Blue  Lagoon (we must be in
the water at 10:00 am to qualify for the dive!)? For  more info, contact OJ
Strickland at sorris@hotmail.com.

_____________________
LOCAL  DIVING AT BALMORHEA STATE PARK - Memorial Day Weekend, May  26-28
Balmorhea State Park is about an 8-9  hour drive from Katy, page # 7 in
the "Texas, Dive Site Book".??  Since we're going over the long weekend,
we?should have ample time to try  and find?Balmorhea's (2) two endangered
fish species, the Comanche Springs  Pupfish
and the Pecos Mosquito fish,?along with all the Mexican Tetras,  Minnows,
Perch, Catfish, crawfish, turtles and the "bubbling sands" of the  springs.
Please RSVP?so we can calculate how things need to be arranged
(ride sharing, sharing big tents, food, stoves, etc.) .? We plan on  doing
combined food cook outs, night dives and just have a ton of? FUN.
For more info, contact OJ Strickland at  sorris@hotmail.com.?

_____________________
SEA  SPACE- June 9 & 10
Houston's biggest dive expo - open to  the public.??For more information,
check out the  website?at?www.seaspace.org.  HammerHeads will have club info
on the TGCC table.?
_____________________
LOCAL DIVING, SOUTH PADRE  LIBERTY SHIPS - June?23 & 24
The  plan is to?leave after work on Friday, June 22 and make the six hour
drive.? Overnight?at the Motel 6 (~$50 per night).? Dive the  Liberty Ships
with?American Diving?(website: www.divesouthpadre.com) on Saturday
($125).?Depths ranging from 45 - 130 feet.?? If  possible,?squeeze in a short
trip to the Texas Marine Park Artificial Reef  on Sunday morning ($75).?
Depths of 45 - 73 feet.
The boat?can  handle 15 divers on the full day trip and up to 18 on the half
day.? Please  notify Roger Veteto rveteto@houston.rr.com if you  interested.?
He needs a rough idea of how many people are interested by May  1st, so?he
can call make reservations.
_____________________

U/W PHOTOGRAPHY GUEST SPEAKER -  June 28
Farley Grissett is coordinating a guest  speaker for June's social.? Learn
some basics of underwater photography and  see great slides.? More details to
come.
_____________________

BEST U.S. DIVE SPOT  ARTICLE
HammerHeads Central is working on an  article for the July issue of Skin
Diver that highlights the best U.S. dive  spots - in celebration of the 4th
of July.? They need your help in finding  the best diving in the U.S.? Just
send a quick email back to ruby@formulapr.com to tell us the best  local dive
spots in your region, and you just might find it in Skin  Diver.
_____________________
CALL FOR THE  MILITARY
Are you in the military?? Do know any divers that  are???HammerHeads Central
has an exciting media opportunity with  Military Style Magazine, a magazine
devoted to military personnel from coast to  coast.? The editor would like to
interview any divers that are in the  military...
discussing what's so unique about  diving, the best places to go and your
favorite equipment.? If you would  like to contribute, please contact Ruby
Enriquez at 619-234-0345 or email ruby@formulapr.com.?
?


Craig

We do not have any UK ISDAs with any of the attached -

Tana should be able to respond to you re: the US...(Tana - thanks!)

Justin

Craig Young
31/10/2000 16:09
To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Craig Young/NY/ECT@ECT

Subject: ISDA

As a start could you advise if we have an ISDA with the following firms

Coke
Pepsi
Anheuser Busch
Gen Motors
Ford
Mercedes Benz
Steel Companies
Metal Companies
Container Companies
Hedgd Funds
Emerson Electric
Hydro Quebec
Bonneville

Do we have a clearing house for global ISDA agreements?

Craig Young
212-715-2342


Ben, please find attached the preliminary cost estimate for full O&M services
provided at one greenfield, stand alone 2 x LM6000 PC Sprint simple cycle
power project located at St Peter, Illinois. The project is assumed to be
100% gas-fired and operating 1,600 hrs per year in the months of May through
September. The staffing plan does not anticipate operations during the other
months of the year. The tentative schedule is NTP 9/00 and COD 6/01. Ameren
is to own and operate.

A couple of questions:
1. Where is Ameren's headquarters located, i.e. the home office where their
O&M staff would get their admin, technical support?
2. Who will own and operate the same plant that Spectrum is building 20 miles
to the north of St Peter?

Please review and call should you have questions or comments.

regards, Scot


COLUMBIA GAS TRANSMISSION CORPORATION
                        NOTICE TO ALL INTERESTED PARTIES
                                OCTOBER 08, 2001

Notice ID: 3163
5 - NO RESPONSE REQUIRED

NOTE:  The following is being provided by Columbia as notice to all of its
shippers of potential outages or reductions in available capacity in the
identified portions of the system due to construction activities, routine
maintenance, modifications, tests or repairs undertaken to protect the
integrity and performance capability of its storage and transmission
facilities.  The information provided below is subject to change for numerous
reasons, including but not limited to, third-party controlled events and
decisions, weather, work schedules, equipment availability, force majeure
events, etc.  Thus, while Columbia is willing to provide this notice and update
it periodically as necessary, Columbia is unable to represent and warrant that
the specific activities will occur, or that they will occur on or near the
specified dates.

SUBJECT:   2002 TENTATIVE OUTAGE SCHEDULE

In February 2002, Columbia's Line BM-22 in Martin Co., KY will be out of
service due to Highway relocation for three (3) days resulting in a reduction
of approximately 23,000 Dth/d of production flowing through Kermit Compressor.
This includes the following lines: P-94, V-55 and BM-18.

In the spring of 2002, contingent upon the mining activity, Columbia's Line KA
will be out of service for three (3) days due to a coal mining relocation tie
in.  Approximately 100,000 Dth/d of Appalachian production west of the May Fork
valve on Line KA will be shut in.

In the spring of 2002, Columbia's Boldman Compressor located in Pike Co., KY,
will have one unit down for approximately two (2) months for annual maintenance
which results in a 15,000 Dth/d flow reduction.  Affected is Equitable's Hi-Hat
(F3) pipeline, CNR's Boldman (CNR02) pipeline, and Appalachian production
located on Columbia's Lines PM-3 and PM-17.

In May-June 2002, Columbia's Line's BM-18, Line VM-141 and Line V-55 will be
out of service for five (5) days due to a relocation for WV Rt. 52 in Mingo
Co., WV.  The affect, if any, on production is being evaluated.

In July 2002, Line 1711 will be out of service for three (3) days due to a
relocation of the Monongahela River crossing tie in.  The affect, if any, on
production is being evaluated.

The following outages affect Equitable's Beaver Creek (H1) pipeline, and
Appalachian production from Columbia's Boldman Compressor Station to Columbia's
Huff Creek Compressor Station on Line KA, including Line KA-15.

In March 2002, Columbia anticipates an outage of three (3) days on Columbia's
Line SM-116 as a result of coal mining activity.  In addition to the above
listed production, Conoco's Grant (P1) pipeline and Appalachian production
located on Line SM-116 will be affected.

In June 2002, Columbia's Grant Compressor located in Mingo Co., WV will have
one unit out of service for six (6) days which will result in a 50,000 Dth/d
flow reduction.

In August 2002, Columbia's Huff Creek Compressor located in Wyoming Co., WV
will be out of service for one (1) week due to annual maintenance.

In the fall of 2002, Columbia's Line KA will be out of service for three (3)
days due to relocation for a highway expansion project on Rt. 119.   The
relocation is between Johns Creek and Canada, which will result in 100,000
Dth/d of production shut in west of the May Fork valve setting.


Pardon the delay, but I inadvertently left you off the email.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 02/08/2001 02:53
PM ---------------------------

Kay Mann
02/07/2001 05:47 PM
To: lhenneberry@ssd.com, mahon@pbworld.com, losi@pbworld.com
cc: Mark Bernstein/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Co Op City

Hi there,

I'm forwarding a draft EPC contract for your review.  This form of contract
assumes that the equipment will be procurred by the Owner, with the
understanding that we have not resolved the issue of the timing of the
procurement of the equipment, and  how it will be procurred.

This is intended to be a discussion draft, and is subject to further Enron
review and comment.

Thanks,

Kay


Just making sure you are aware....

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Callahan, Timothy
Sent:	Monday, August  13, 2001 6:39 PM
To:	Vu, Nancy H.; Melodick, Kim
Cc:	Whiteurst, Lloyd; Longoria, Rebecca
Subject:	Marc Sabine

Nancy/Kim,

Received a call from Marc today.  He will be relocating back from Monterrey effective August 31.  Please confirm.

Rebecca will provide the necessary information to Relocation upon confirmation.

Lloyd,  Marc would like his IMA before August 31, if possible.

Regards,


No probola!  It will be good to have an excuse to go to NM.  Maybe I will go
this weekend.

So glad you had rain over the weekend!  We did too, and we had had a dry
spell for almost as long.  I hope it was not too late to save my back yard,
which was starting to smell like cooked grass.

Bill and I are on the outs.  He just will not do what he needs to in order to
make things work, so I have given up.  Of course now he is trying to be
charming.  Anyway, I will have to tell you the whole story some other time.

The kiddies are going back to school already so now would be a good time to
plan a trip to D.C. at last.  Maybe early Sept?
Also I'd be game for a girls' trip to Destin.

Time to work!
Love,
Sooz

Camp2scott@aol.com on 07/24/2000 08:50:44 PM
To: Susan.Scott@enron.com
cc:

Subject: a favor

Hi, Sooz,

Don't make a special trip, but the next time you're at the Galleria, would
you go by the Neiman's Clientele make-up counter (by the candy) and get
something for me?  Clientele Wrinkle Treatment.  It'll be pricy, but just let
me know and I'll get a check to you.
love, mum


I authorized the wire to be sent to set up the account.  Progress!

"Campbell, Carolyn" <CCampbell@KSLAW.com> on 04/25/2001 01:21:10 PM
To: "'Kay.Mann@enron.com'" <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: RE: signature pages

Kay:

I have received these.  I have also received the Escrow Agmt sig page and
incumbency certificate from U.S. Bank Trust.  I'm still waiting on PPL's
signature page and incumbency certificate.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King;& Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com>
;

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 12:52 PM
To: ccampbell@kslaw.com
Subject: docs

Carolyn,

I faxed signed sig pages for the ENA letter, ENA consent, resolution
authorizing transaction, GE letter as to forms, escrow agreement, cert of
incumbancy for escrow, fee agreement.  I faxed the docs to the 80 fax
number.

Thanks,

Kay

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.


Hi Team!  I will be out of the office on Friday, March 31st.  Please call
Scott Goodell at 713-853-7711 with any questions you may have.

Later


If you could redraft the "representations and warranties" provision to be
simpler and clearer, I think that we could agree to it.  The other items
look fine.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jon Wood [mailto:jwood@mattbran.com]
Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2000 10:45 AM
To: 'Pfister, Christian W.'
Cc: 'ksyates@cps-satx.com'; Howard Bye
Subject: RE: Enfolio Contract with CPS

My reading is that Enron seeks a continuing representation that (i) all
transactions have the appropriate approval, waiving any defense of lack of
authority, (ii) there is no sovereign immunity (something is left out of
thelanguage) defense to any transaction, (iii) payment for the gas will be
first in the flow of funds, and (iv) the obligations are not subject to debt
restrictions or other public funds restrictions of the Texas Constitution,
statutes or CPS constituency documents.  I think we can legally make these
representations and warranties, but the language needs some work.  You
should ask them to redraft this provision so it is simpler and clearer.  Jon

-----Original Message-----
From: Pfister, Christian W. [mailto:CWPfister@cps-satx.com]
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 2:16 PM
To: 'jwood@mattbran.com'
Subject: FW: Enfolio Contract with CPS

Mr. Wood,

This is a spot gas contract with Enron that you reviewed on August 8th for
Mary Pelayo and Danny McWhirter.  Enron has added a paragraph under
"Representations and Warranties" that I would like you to review.  I am not
sure exactly what it means.  Thank you.

-----Original Message-----
From: Yates, Katherine S.
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 1:52 PM
To: Pfister, Christian W.
Subject: RE: Enfolio Contract with CPS

Sounds like legal mumbo jumbo. I would advise getting John't input in case
he is more familiar with the reasoning behind this jargon.

Katherine S. Yates
CPS Attorney
353-2069

-----Original Message-----
From: Pfister, Christian W.
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 1:40 PM
To: Yates, Katherine S.
Subject: FW: Enfolio Contract with CPS

Kathy,

This spot gas contract was reviewed by Jon Wood a few months ago.  The
following was added under "Representations and Warranties" by Enron.  I have
highlighted the text in the attachment so you can see where it was
incorporated (page 2 of Appendix 1).

"Further and with respect to Customer only, Customer represents and warrants
to Company continuing throughout the term of this Agreement as follows:  (i)
all acts necessary to the valid execution and performance of this Agreement
have been duly adopted, (ii) with respect to the contractual obligations
hereunder and performance thereof, it is not entitled to itself or its
revenues or assets from (a) suit, (b) jurisdiction of court, (c) relief by
way of injunction, order for specific performance or recovery of property,
(d) attachment of assets or (e) execution or enforcement of any judgment,
(iii) its obligations to make payments hereunder are unsubordinated
obligations and such payments are operating and maintenance costs which
enjoy first priority of payment at all times under any and all indentures to
which it is a party, its constitutional and governing documents and
applicable law, and (iv) its obligations to make payments hereunder do not
constitute any kind of indebtedness of Customer or create any kind of lien
on, or security interest in, any property or revenues of Customer which, in
either case , is proscribed by any provision of its constitutional and
governing documents, any order to judgment of any court or other agency of
government applicable to it or its assets, or any contractual restriction
binding on or affecting it or any of its assets."

Do you think this is acceptable, or do you think I should show this added
paragraph to Jon Wood?

-----Original Message-----
From: Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com [mailto:Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2000 2:51 PM
To: Pfister, Christian W.; Mc Whirter, Daniel D.
Cc: James.I.Ducote@enron.com; Janet.H.Wallis@enron.com
Subject: Re: Enfolio Contract with CPS

(See attached file: CITYPublicServiceSanAntonio.doc)

Attached please find a revised Enfolio Contract with CPS.  The changes
      incorporated in the attached contract are:
1)  "City Public Service (San Antonio)" has been changed to "The City of
      San Antonio, acting through City Public Service Board".
2)  The effective date has been changed to "October 1, 2000.
3)  The changes requested in items 1 and 2 of the addendum have been
      incorporated.
4) The Utilization of Small Business Concerns language has been added as
      the last item in Appendix "1", and
5)  An additional representation has been added at the end of the
      Representations and Warranties in Appendix "1" relating to the
      necessary authorizations with respect to the execution, delivery and
      performance by Customer of  this Agreement.

If these changes are acceptable please advise and we will forward two
      original copies for execution.


So how do you say "bitch" in Spanish?


Debra and Dan -

Attached is a worksheet for another new physical, with the City of Anaheim.
Please send a draft to:

Mr. Steve Shortino
City of Anaheim
201 S. Anaheim Blvd.
Suite 802
Anaheim, CA 92805

Please email a copy to me and to Kim Ward.

Thanks,

Jay


The name police... O

-----Original Message-----
From: Cheung, Cecilia
Sent: Thu 1/24/2002 3:57 PM
To: Engel, Tom; Winfree, O'Neal D.; Kenne, Dawn C.; Severson, Russ; Brackett, Debbie R.; Wallumrod, Ellen; Spears, Christopher; Price, Wade R.; Hayden, Frank; Dahlke, Andrea; Saleem, Aftab; Swaim, Michael; Lim, Christine; Krishnaswamy, Jayant; Hunter, Larry Joe; Stevens, Mechelle; Smith, Regan M.; Bowen, Bob
Cc: Denny, Jennifer; Sweitzer, Tara; Meredith, Kevin; Lozano, Melba
Subject: RE: EOL test trades

Dawn already notified us the other day about this but nobody confirmed me what to use at that time.  I'll change the Tagg bridge program to read OLT instead of EOL today.

Cecilia

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Engel, Tom
Sent:   Thursday, January 24, 2002 3:53 PM
To:     Winfree, O'Neal D.; Kenne, Dawn C.; Severson, Russ; Brackett, Debbie R.; Wallumrod, Ellen; Spears, Christopher; Price, Wade R.; Hayden, Frank; Dahlke, Andrea; Saleem, Aftab; Swaim, Michael; Cheung, Cecilia; Lim, Christine; Krishnaswamy, Jayant; Hunter, Larry Joe; Stevens, Mechelle; Smith, Regan M.; Bowen, Bob

Cc:     Denny, Jennifer; Sweitzer, Tara; Meredith, Kevin; Lozano, Melba
Subject:        RE: EOL test trades

We need to stop calling the UBS online trades EOL.  We also need to change the downstream systems - especially the auto confirms to something other than EOL for the transaction ID - or anything else.  I spoke to Dave Forster about this and he suggested we use OLT (on-line-trade) and OLT transaction number.

Unfortunately the new website for trading does not have an exciting name (www.ubswenergy.com) - so unlike EnronOnline - it does not stand out.

I realize it may take some time to change everywhere in all the systems it says "Enron" - but as you know, we definitely need to do it wherever the customers are involved.


please print
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 10/16/2000
12:05 PM ---------------------------

Rick Bergsieker@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
10/15/2000 09:30 AM
To: Clay Harris/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Wayne
Perry/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Doug
Arnell/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Emilio
Vicens/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Merritt Thomas@ECT, Brad
Hitch/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Henry
Means/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, A G
Gelotti/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Eric Gonzales@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman@ECT, dennis.vegas@enron.com
Subject: LNG brochure revised draft

As you know, we are preparing a new LNG brochure that will be rolled out at
the Gastech Conference in Houston mid November.  Many of you have submitted
comments that are hopefullyincluded herein.  Attached is the latest draft of
the brochure text.  Please review this very carefully and submit your
comments to Henry Means/Zdenek Gerych by Tuesday noon.

I have scanned this and have noted at least several typos and some
numerical/statistical errors.  AG, please check in particular the DPC/Metgas
stuff.

Henry/Z, the purpose of this brochure is to communicate that the market is
changing and that Enron is leading the transformation of this industry.
However, there is a negative tone in parts of this that is a slap in the face
to the major oil companies and the government companies particularly in the
Mid east and Far East.  I want to get all negatives out---anything that a
supplier could read as an insult will come back to bite us.  The message
should be bold but positive, with no implied insults.

I look forward to reading the next draft Tuesday evening

Rick
---------------------- Forwarded by Rick Bergsieker/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
10/15/2000 09:17 AM ---------------------------

Dennis Vegas
10/14/2000 09:23 AM
To: Rick Bergsieker/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Henry Means/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Zdenek
Gerych/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: LNG brochure revised draft

Attached is the draft as promised. This reflects input from several members
of the team. It is easy to read and flows well. Please review and share you
feedback by Wed before noon ( no later, sorry). Once complete, we will
circulate the final with your comments. I do need the name of the lawyer that
would approve the final draft for the LNG team.

Hope you had a good trip back.


Probably want to grab both slots. What do you think Louise ?


It's time to kick-off Enron's 2000 United Way Campaign!  This year's theme is
"Who Wants to Help Millions for the United Way?"

By now, everyone should have received a trivia questionnaire through email.
By answering all 15 questions correctly, you will have a chance to be
selected for an opportunity to be in our United Way game show on August 9
following the all-employee meeting.  If you are selected, you'll be entering
in the "fast finger" and give your "final answer" qualifying round.
Finalists from the qualifying round will be a contestant on the Enron "Who
Wants to Help Millions?" game show.

The last day you can submit your answers to be eligible for the game show is
Wednesday, July 26.  Let's make sure that GPG is represented in full force
during this year's campaign!

Watch your email for additional information about this year's Kick-Off and
how you can help millions throughout the United Way Campaign.


Hi Sara, I added some counterparties to your document.  All counterparties
that we have done hourly financial trades with are in the above document.

Let me know if you need anything else.

Thanks,
Melissa


Although the GISB is an Americanized form, we do have a Canadianized GISB, but we have never used it.  It also limited to trades for 30 days or less.  As to the history, I have no clue, but if someone gets Greg a credit worksheet we can get them a Master fairly quickly.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hodge, Jeffrey T.
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 12:05 PM
To:	Aronowitz, Alan; Keohane, Peter
Subject:	RE: Request for J Aron Gas Master (US and Canada)

Alan:

	Obviously, we would be willing to enter into a Master Agreement with Goldman Sachs/J Aron.  At this point in time we would not be willing to enter into a GISB as we would prefer working under the GTCs until the Master is hammered out.

	If you can get credit to get us the appropriate information, we can prepare the master.

Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Aronowitz, Alan
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 12:01 PM
To:	Hodge, Jeffrey T.; Keohane, Peter
Subject:	Request for J Aron Gas Master (US and Canada)

In negotiating the cross-affiliate master netting agreement with Goldman Sachs/J Aron, they have inquired as to our willingness to enter into a Master Gas Purchase and Sale Agreement for US and Canada gas trading, respectively. Currently, we are trading under GTCs (online and offline). In the interim, they have also asked if we would willing to enter into a GISB to replace working under the GTCs.

I'm not really sure why we haven't gotten a master agreement in place with J Aron in the past other than neither party was focusing on the necessity of doing so. Your recollections/thoughts going forward?

Alan


please print

---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 03/17/2000
04:32 PM ---------------------------

"Mary Rembert" <REMBM@andrews-kurth.com> on 03/17/2000 04:16:30 PM
To: "TOM POPPLEWELL" <POPPT@andrews-kurth.com>, <alan.quaintance@enron.com>,
<bill.brown@enron.com>, <carol.st.clair@enron.com>,
<charles.delacey@enron.com>, <gareth.bahlmann@enron.com>,
<jodi.coulter@enron.com>, <ryan.siurek@enron.com>, <Sshackl@enron.com>,
<trevor.randolph@enron.com>, <mniebruegge@mayerbrown.com>,
<tellwood@mayerbrown.com>, <schottla@us.cibc.com>, <wolfmark@us.cibc.com>
cc: "DAVID BARBOUR" <BARBD@andrews-kurth.com>, "DALLAS GUEST ACCOUNT #2"
<DGUEST2@andrews-kurth.com>, "DEBORAH LOWE" <LOWED@andrews-kurth.com>
Subject: Swap Schedule

     On an early conference call, Ian Schottlaender made the comment that in
previous deals some of the banks have been confused by the termination
provisions which were the first provisions in the Swap Schedule and,
consequently, appeared on the front cover.  He asked if these provisions
could be moved to a different part of the document and so were not
conspicuous on the front cover.
     Accordingly, I swapped Part 1 of the Schedule with Part 5 of the
Schedule.  Unfortunately, this meant that the CompareRite documents sent out
earlier this week contained a lot of blacklined language, making it difficult
to read Part 1 and Part 5.
     Attached to this e-mail is a blackline of the current Part 5 to the
Hawaii Schedule compared to Part 1 of the Ghost Schedule, and the current
Part 1 of the Hawaii Schedule compared to Part 5 of the Ghost Schedule.
     Please call me at 214-659-4414 if you have any questions or comments.

 - COMPARISON Part 5 216444.10 to Part 1 232882.1.WPD
 - COMPARISON Part 1 216444.10 to Part 5 232882.WPD


Attached please find the Joint Consumer Group's responses to BPA data
requests BPA-JCG:01 - 11 and BPA-JCG:13 - 14.  Thank you.

 <<BPA-JCG-01.doc>>  <<BPA-JCG-02.doc>>  <<BPA-JCG-03.doc>>
<<BPA-JCG-04.doc>>  <<BPA-JCG-05.doc>>  <<BPA-JCG-06.doc>>
<<BPA-JCG-07.doc>>  <<BPA-JCG-08.doc>>  <<BPA-JCG-09.doc>>
<<BPA-JCG-10.doc>>  <<BPA-JCG-11.doc>>  <<BPA-JCG-13.doc>>  <<BPA-JCG-14.doc>>

Kelly C. Beniga
kbeniga @ schwabe.com
(503) 796-2445

NOTICE:  This communication may contain privileged or other confidential
information. If you are not the intended recipient or believe that you may
have received this communication in error,  please reply to the sender
indicating that fact and delete the copy you received.  In addition, you
should not print, copy,  retransmit, disseminate, or otherwise use the
information.       Thank you.
 - BPA-JCG-01.doc
 - BPA-JCG-02.doc
 - BPA-JCG-03.doc
 - BPA-JCG-04.doc
 - BPA-JCG-05.doc
 - BPA-JCG-06.doc
 - BPA-JCG-07.doc
 - BPA-JCG-08.doc
 - BPA-JCG-09.doc
 - BPA-JCG-10.doc
 - BPA-JCG-11.doc
 - BPA-JCG-13.doc
 - BPA-JCG-14.doc


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Enron General Announcements
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 4:14 PM
To:	DL-GA-all_domestic; DL-GA-all_NETCO
Subject:	Assistance for Former Employees

Many of you have friends who are no longer with the company, so we wanted to provide you an overview of continuing efforts to assist Enron's former employees.

CAREER SERVICES
Last December Enron established a website to assist former employees identify jobs in Houston and throughout the United States.  Only former Enron employees and potential employers can access the site, http://careerservices.enron.com/

On this site, former employees can:
	? Post their resumes for approved employers to view
	? View job postings
	? Receive updates and information on career and community services available to them
As of January 25, 2002:
	? More than 1,300 companies had been approved to view resumes
	? Company recruiters had logged on more than 3,500 times to search for candidates
	? More than 600 jobs had been posted on the site

FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE
The Greater Houston Community Foundation
The Greater Houston Community Foundation (GHCF), in collaboration with the United Way of the Texas Gulf Coast, the Houston Area Urban League, Crisis Intervention of Houston, and Career and Recovery Resources, have established a fund to provide dedicated support for former Enron employees.  GHCF offers former employees counseling services and helps them work with mortgage companies, landlords and utilities to defer monthly bills while they are out of work.   If you are interested in making a tax-deductible donation to the GHCF, please call 713-268-6458 or mail donations to GHCF at 4550 Post Oak Place, Suite 317, Houston, TX  77027.  Checks should be made payable to Greater Houston Community Foundation and designated for the Enron Employee Transition Fund.  To receive assistance, former employees can call 713-533-4598, or outside Houston, 1-800-493-4598.  Lines are open 24 hours a day, seven days a week.

Enron Ex-Employee Relief Fund Account
A former employee has established the Enron Ex-Employee Relief Fund Account at the Humble Community Bank.  Visit the website at <http://www.eerfa.com> for more information or to make a donation.  Former employees can submit grant requests to eerfarequest@surfmk.com.

MDPC Transitional Assistance Program
Memorial Drive Presbyterian Church has created a Transitional Assistance Program open to both members and non-members who need assistance re-entering the workforce.  Right Management Consultants offers a series of two-day workshops for former employees on topics such as Career Assessment and Evaluation, Job Search Communication and Managing in a Time of Change.  Requests for limited and discretionary short-term financial assistance will be accepted from those who have participated in this program.  MDPC will offer a holistic approach to re-entering the workforce including family counseling and stress management. For more information, contact Memorial Drive Presbyterian Church at 713-953-2550, ext 180.


Scott Goodell@ENRON
02/17/2000 12:45 PM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

The best contacts at Sonat are...

Jerry Nelson 205-325-7257
Lisa Guthrie 205-325-3816


Here's a new deal for you.

I've got two follow on deals for K & S, so this one might be a good one to
use someone else, if you need and want to. (I hear the rustling of the
pines..)  Clear outside counsel selections with Jeff, then Mark, etc.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 02/27/2001 08:15
AM ---------------------------

Fred Mitro@ECT
02/23/2001 02:01 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron, Sheila
Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: CA - Onondaga

Kay:

Ben and I are working on a deal that involves the monetization of a Cash Flow
Interest which ENA currently holds in Onondaga Cogeneration L.P. (an 80 MW
combined cycle plant in NY state)

We would like to begin discussions next week with parties interested in
purchasing ENA's interest in OCLP.  Please prepare a form CA and forward to
Ben and I so that we may forward it to the interested counterparties.  We
also need one draft CA prepared for the following counterparty:

 Trust Company of the West

Sheila has inititated the process of assigning the Cash Flow Interest from
ENA into an LLC.

Call me if you wish to discuss.

Fred


I need to get an idea of how many people will be participating in the party,
so I can make the food order.  If you will be attending, please reply for a
complete headcount, before lunch.  I plan on ordering (1)Veggie, (1)Greek
(veggies & cheese, no tomato sauce), (1)Supreme, and (1)Mushroom/Canadian
Bacon.  If you should have any questions or comments, please feel free to
contact me.  Thanks, Keegan (5-3317)

          PIZZA PARTY!!!

WHEN:  Tuesday, November 14th, after 5pm

WHERE: East Bay, 38th Floor

WHY:   To motivate us to categorize the material currently stored under your
name in the file cabinets (and atop those cabinets, if applicable) into (A)
                        "Trash" or (B) "Save", prior to Wednesday's mandated
moving of the file cabinets to another location in the East Bay area.  Pizza
and sodas
                        provided by a friend of the "Building Guy"!

                        p.s. Trash bins and boxes to be provided .

Should you have questions regarding this matter, contact Keegan Farrell at
x5-3317.


I wonder if HR changed this holiday schedule over the last couple of months?  Let's ask Kathy, she will know.


Dear Colleague:

The Edison Electric Institute just published a report I wrote on Real-Time
Balancing Operations and Markets: Key to Competitive Wholesale Electricity
Markets. The report is available from the Publications page of my website,
www.EHirst.com. Here is a summary of the report:

Electricity production and consumption must occur at essentially the same
time. Therefore, real-time (minute-to-minute) operations and the associated
markets and prices are essential ingredients of a competitive wholesale
electricity industry. In addition, these intrahour markets are the foundation
of all forward markets and contracts, including hour- and day-ahead markets,
monthly futures, and bilateral contracts. Finally, these intrahour operations
maintain system reliability by ensuring that enough and the right kinds of
supply and demand resources are available when needed.

Because of various load, generation, and transmission factors, balancing
generation to load on a minute-to-minute basis is complicated. Loads are
volatile, both from hour to hour and from minute to minute during the morning
rampup and evening dropoff. Generators differ substantially in their costs of
electricity production. In addition, generators have various idiosyncratic
characteristics, such as maximum and minimum output levels and maximum
ramprates, that limit their ability to respond rapidly to changes in system
load or generation. Finally, transmission characteristics affect the
real-time balancing function because of congestion and sudden transmission
outages. These factors can lead to dramatic and rapid changes in electricity
prices, including occasional negative prices when generators pay someone to
take their output.

The early years of operations by independent system operators (ISOs), based
on the experiences in New England, New York, and California, show how
difficult it is to translate the theory and initial design of competitive
markets into ones that work efficiently. These ISOs have been plagued with
various startup problems that artificially raise electricity costs to
consumers, implicitly encourage strategic bidding by some generators, do not
sufficiently discipline generator market power, sometimes yield insufficient
resources, and impair reliability. Fortunately, the ISOs have been quick to
identify and remedy flaws in their initial market designs. On the other hand,
the ISOs have done a poor job of documenting these problems and their
resolutions.

This report is primarily a primer on how such intrahour operations and
markets should work. It demonstrates these principles through several
examples. These examples deal with generator ramprate limits, low-operating
limits, startup costs, and other generator characteristics. Other examples
show how energy-limited (e.g., hydro) units differ in their bidding and
operations from capacity-constrained (e.g., thermal) units, how the
consideration of multiple time intervals affects operations and pricing, how
generators located outside the control area are treated differently from
those within the control-area boundary, how interval pricing combined with
hourly settlements can encourage generators to ignore dispatch signals, and
how intermittent resources (such as wind) affect control-area operations.

Although U.S. wholesale competitive markets today suffer from a variety of
problems, there is reason to be optimistic. Ultimately, the ISOs (and, later
on, RTOs) will identify and fix the problems within their market structures,
and they will adequately document their problems and the associated
resolutions so that their market participants and the designers of other
systems can learn from past mistakes. Ultimately, efficient real-time markets
should allow reliability councils and system operators to largely replace
command-and-control rules with market signals (i.e., prices that vary rapidly
in response to changes in system security). These changes should lower the
costs of maintaining reliability; deploy supply and demand resources more
efficiently; and guide investments in new generation, transmission, and
demand-side resources.

Eric
----------------------------------------------
Eric Hirst
Consulting in Electric-Industry Restructuring
106 Capital Circle
Oak Ridge, TN 37830
865-482-5470 (phone & fax)??? Eric@EHirst.com
http://www.EHirst.com


The new schedule is out for April, if you have any conflicting dates please
let me know,

ryan


Mitch:
Just wanted to talk to you for a quick second about something we talked about
this week.  Please give me a call and I'll come down.
Ben


Pull this together and then call Sharon so they can come get the copies.
Thanks.

DG
---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 12/06/2000
02:50 PM ---------------------------

Sharon Smith@ENRON
12/06/2000 01:33 PM
To: Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: September P&L

In review of our third quarter file, we have not received the P&L top pages
or curve shift reports for the following regions:  West Firm, FT Northwest
and Mgmt. West.  Please provide this information as we would like to close
out our third quarter file.  Thank you in addition for your help.

Sharon


lsu is only a 10 point dog.  it is hard not to want to take tenn.  i might
take tenn and call it a "hedge".


I'm throwing out my thoughts on question 1 for the current case.

1.  Evaluate Patten's business strategy.

    My first thought centered around the fact that Patten's real expertise is
in real estate development.  They have a well thought out strategy of who the
customer is and how to sell effectively to these customers.  They have
developed a good business relationship with the large property owners.  With
little risk they analyze their ability to subdivide the properties.  Once
this is completed and the land purchased, they unleash their marketing
strategy.
    The marketing strategy seems to effectively gain sales without
extravegant costs.  The sales staff is custom designed to relate personally
to the average customer.  Their gross margin for land sales is 54.8%.  Even
if you include the selling, general and admin expense their margin is 24%.
    The part of their business strategy I struggle with is the finance
business.  What do a bunch of land developers know about finance.  In my
opinion land financing should be left to the experts.  If they established a
preferred financing company, they could negotiate a standard finders fee for
the loans.  More importantly they would eliminate the risk in their revenue
streams.  When they make a sale the revenue could be immediately booked since
they would not hold the debt, the finance company would.  Their current
portfolio of notes receivable is $18.6M.  It looks like ignoring expenses
their financing margin is 3%.  This only gives $0.56M in revenues.  This
number seems pretty small compared to the accounting heartburn it creates.
Obviously this number would be much smaller if they were properly estimating
unrecoverables.
    I guess the bottom line is "what is their core competency"?  I believe
its land development not land finance.

Anyway give me your thoughts and I'll clean it up in a word document.

Jimmy


I believe Melissa had talked to you about checking once again to see if these
deals should be against the PX index.  It is our understanding that we are
going to have to move everything that is against that index to another index
at some point.

Thanks!
---------------------- Forwarded by Sharen Cason/HOU/ECT on 02/02/2001 10:04
AM ---------------------------
   Kate Symes                01/30/2001 06:27 PM

To: Sharen Cason/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: 509018 and 508957

These deals were entered to flatten out the traders' positions in the PX. You
shouldn't see the index being used on any deals past tomorrow (the exchange
closes effective Feb. 1), but Bob Badeer and Matt Motley both had positions
they needed to back out of. They turned around and bought the same amount at
the Dow Jones index. Hope this helps!

Kate

	From:  Sharen Cason                           01/30/2001 04:15 PM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: 509018 and 508957

Ditto.  These two are priced against the PX index also.

Thanks!
---------------------- Forwarded by Sharen Cason/HOU/ECT on 01/30/2001 06:12
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Sharen Cason                           01/30/2001 06:04 PM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: #509086

This deal lis entered against the PX index.  We have been told by Chris
Foster that this index is going away.  Can you check and see if this is the
correct index?

Thanks!


Gerald,

I don't have a computer copy of the report.  The main concern I had in my
review of the Hard copy (which I have with me) was the suggestion that
monitoring wells be installed at the 2 cogen sites.  Question that comes up
from a "legal" perspective is how liability gets allocated to various owners
if the wells later show environmental contamination.  I've left a voicemail
to Heather outlining this  concern.

Steve
----- Forwarded by Steve Van Hooser/HOU/ECT on 01/02/2001 09:34 AM -----

	Heather Kroll
	12/22/2000 10:54 AM

		 To: Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT, Reagan Rorschach/NA/Enron@Enron, Steve Van
Hooser/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Lumberton, Elizabethtown Phase II

I'm getting a copy of the official Phase II report Fed Exed to me today.
Here is Dave Kellermeyer initial report.  Basically they are very clean coal
plants.

Heather
---------------------- Forwarded by Heather Kroll/HOU/ECT on 12/22/2000 10:57
AM ---------------------------

Dave Kellermeyer
12/20/2000 07:17 AM
To: Ozzie Pagan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Heather Kroll/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dwight
Beach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Glenn Wright/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Janet R Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Lumberton, Elizabethtown Phase II

ENSR has obtained the analytical results from the Phase II investigation and
is in the process of writing up the results.  I spoke at length with the
individuals responsible for the investigation and can provide you with some
preliminary conclusions.  Keep in mind, that these are my interpretations of
our conversation and that they may produce a slightly different spin on the
results.

Railcar Unloading Site

There were no detectable petroleum hydrocarbons detected at the site of the
former 10,000 gallon diesel tank, either in soil or groundwater.
Groundwater sampling around the former coal pile area produced some
detectable substances (sulfates, lead, iron).  However, these substances were
not present in quantities that would indicate a contamination problem.  The
levels of these substances in groundwater is comparable to that in nearby
groundwater monitoring wells.

Lumberton Plant

The small diesel tank area that had been identified in the Phase I as having
evidence of contamination was sampled.  Concentrations of total petroleum
hydrocarbons were marginally detectable in the soil and at extremely small
quantities in the groundwater.  The levels in the groundwater are at least
six times lower than the appropriate Action Level.  No further action is
warranted.
The area around the silo has soil is heavily stained with ash down to about 6
inches from the surface.  In general, the soil samples taken did not have
particularly elevated concentrations of metals with the exception of a sample
that was taken by scraping off the surficial ash.  Even this surficial sample
did not have metal concentrations significantly above typical soil background
levels.  Overall, the presence of this material is probably the result of
runoff of an ash slurry from the ash trucks as a result of the use of water
for dust suppresion.  There does not appear to be any widespread, significant
contamination.   Removal of some of the soil around the ash silo might be
contemplated, as well as engineering measures to prevent any future
contamination.
ENSR detected some substances in the groundwater near the coal pile
(sulfates, nickel iron chromium), but indicated that the quantities don't
appear significant.  No further action is warranted.
The area around the oil/water separator (OWS) had detectable quantities of
oil and grease in the soil and groundwater.  These levels are marginally
significant.  ENSR feels that the in-ground OWS tank is leaking.  I believe
that they will probably recommend that the OWS tank is emptied, inspected,
and sealed, if necessary.  At worst, I believe this to be a localized
contamination issue that can be easily addressed.  ENSR may suggest follow up
monitoring.

Elizabethtown

Silo area - similar findings to Lumberton
Coal pile - similar findings to Lumberton.  ENSR was able to obtain a sample
from only one well due to the extremely confining nature of the native clay
soils.  This is probably creating a natural barrier to the transport of
contaminants that complements the coal pile liner.
OWS -  similar findings to Lumberton

Overall

Nothing that ENSR reported to me seems to be indicative of any significant
large scale contamination.  The railcar unloading facility is in good shape.
Both power plant sites appear to have in-ground oil/water separators that may
be leaking oil.  The coal pile areas do not appear to be a concern.  The ash
silo area has some surficial staining of ash and associate elevated metal
concentration in the soil.  I don't think this is significant problem, but
it's likely that the process of ash handling and shipping could be improved
to avoid future releases to the soil.

ENSR will be providing the draft report on Friday.


It was and my apologies.  Sara

Eleanor Fraser on 06/29/99 10:09:57 AM
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Canadian utilities

Sara,

Was this possibly sent to me in error?

Eleanor

Sara Shackleton
06/29/99 09:08 AM
To: Eleanor Fraser/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Canadian utilities

I have three utililities almost ready to go; we were sorting through issues
related to Canadian regulated entities.  SS


Hi there.

I am attaching for the group's consideration a red line that I ran comparing
the current working draft (v4) with the draft John R. recently circulated to
Tax and Insurance.

I suggest that Pete Thompson keep the typewriter on this.  We are getting so
close to the end, I would really like to try to avoid confusion.

I am also attaching a clean copy of the current active version, and the
current list of issues under consideration.  I suggest we work through this
list and turn another draft before soliciting Cris/Herman and Lisa's
comments.  We should also give the ENA commercial reps the opportunity to
review it at that time.

Kay


Attached is the notice for our October  meeting.?I hope to see you there.
?
Jack Tompkins
 - Houston Christian Business Group.doc


This request has been pending your approval for  18 days.  Please click http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000078756&Page=Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000078756
Request Create Date : 12/7/01 5:27:01 PM
Requested For       : michelle.blaine@enron.com
Resource Name       : eConnect - VPN  Tier 2 - Full Access
Resource Type       : Applications


please add to my schedule
---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Neal/HOU/ECT on 08/11/2000 08:57 AM
---------------------------

	From:  David W Delainey @ ENRON                           08/10/2000 05:54 PM

Sent by: Beverly Stephens@ENRON
To: Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike J Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryan
Burnett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rogers Herndon/HOU/ECT@ect, Edward D
Baughman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Tawney/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J
Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kevin McGowan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jennifer
Fraser/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kimberly Brown/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Zarsky/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dusty Warren
Paez/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Felicia Doan/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Tamara Jae Black/HOU/ECT@ECT, Betty J Coneway/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly
Hillis/HOU/ECT@ect, Kay Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laura Harder/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Dinner Meeting at River Oaks Grill

Because of a scheduling conflict earlier in the month, we had to cancel our
original plans for dinner.  The plans have been revised as follows:

  DATE:  August 18, 2000
  PLACE:  The Wine Room
     River Oaks Grill
     2630 Westheimer
     713/520-1738
  TIME:   6:30 PM

If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact Kay
(3X0643) or Beverly (5X7857).

I will look forward to seeing you there.


Please note that Wall 2 Wall has been delayed and will be in tomorrow instead of today.

Sorry for any inconvenience.

Carla

With the recent shuffle of people moving to new desks, I'm sure there will be keyboard trays that need to be moved, as well as some repairs.  Wall 2 Wall will be in on Wednesday afternoon to look after this.

Please let me know by Wednesday morning if you need anything done.

Thanks,

Carla


jeff, I presume this e-mail address is still good. It appears it is Ok to pay this draw. By the way are there any more draws ?
-----Original Message-----
From:   Patti McNeil
Sent:   Thursday, August 23, 2001 2:00 PM
To:     Fernando Parra; Brandy Akers
Subject:        Jeff Skilling/#10396513
We have received all the signed documentation for application no. 28.  It is okay to release payment to Jeff Thomsen.
Thanks!
Patti McNeill
R/E Construction
Funding Mgr.
713-232-1127
Fax: 713-561-0043
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
************************************************************************
The information contained in this ELECTRONIC MAIL transmission
is confidential.  It may also be privileged work product or proprietary
information. This information is intended for the exclusive use of the
addressee(s).  If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution [other
than to the addressee(s)], copying or taking of any action because
of this information is strictly prohibited.
************************************************************************


ONE MORE TIME!

DO NOT SELL BELOW $15 FOR EL PASO WITHOUT RAMPING DOWN FOUR CORNERS!

READ THE INSTRUCTIONS ON THE GENERATION DISPATCH.

Do NOT let this happen again.

See me or another experienced member of the group with questions or concerns.

B


The luncheon will be on Tuesday, October 3rd.


Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490
http://www.aaml.org/


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 01/04/2001
05:35 PM ---------------------------
From: Martin Lin on 01/04/2001 02:15 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: IP technical document

Please find attached a PDF version of the IP technical document.  Comments
are appreciated.  If there are any changes that you need, please let me know.

Thanks,
Martin


Mary- Ken has been asked by Mayor Brown to chair the fundraising effort to
get voter approval on a light rail referendum in Houston.  My guess is that
he will decline given the other demands on his schedule, but I don't know
that for sure.  I think our respnse

Mary Clark@ENRON
04/13/99 02:21 PM
To: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Joe Allen/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Trains - Light rail

Steve/Joe:

Mark suggested that I contact you to provide a response to this employee's
question (see below) to Ken and Jeff about trains and light rail.  Please
draft a response and send it to me.   I will format it and send it to Ken and
Jeff for their review.  Thanks.

Mary Clark
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Clark/Corp/Enron on 04/13/99 02:13
PM ---------------------------

Office Chairman
04/12/99 02:55 PM

To: Mary Clark/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sherri Reinartz/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Trains - Light rail

A question to the Office of the Chairman.

Rosie
---------------------- Forwarded by Office Chairman/Corp/Enron on 04/12/99
02:53 PM ---------------------------

Office of the Chairman@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
04/12/99 07:25 AM
To: Office Chairman@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:
Subject:

Office of the Chairman:

While traveling within Germany recently, I noticed that electric powered
trains are popular and also provide a safe, reliable, affordable and
comfortable means of transportation to the public.

This brought to mind a question to ask you:

Is Enron taking any action to promote development and implementation of
electric trains or light rail in the USA and/or abroad, either through the
Political Action Committee, Lobbying or through the efforts of the Business
Development Offices?

I do believe that the commuters would benefit from having access to electric
trains that provide safe, clean and comfortable transport. Enron could
potentially benefit by supplying the power for these trains within the USA
(and abroad as well).

Just think if the city of Houston offered light rail as an option for
commuting to and from work, as well as commuting to other locations - both
interstate and intrastate. A person could take a train to Galveston, Austin,
or elsewhere and arrive in short time with the high speed rail available.
With the new Ballpark downtown and the revitalization of the downtown area,
it would seem that a legitimate method of public transportation is the
element that is missing from the Houston city model. Buses that run on diesel
are clearly not the solution for mass transit.

Regards,
Dave Hubbard
Cuiaba, Brasil
011-55-65-612-2102


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Aune, Stacey A.
Sent:	Thursday, September 27, 2001 5:19 PM
To:	Gruesen, Karen
Subject:	FW: Notice of Intent to Dissolve

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Pinder, Lori
Sent:	Thursday, September 27, 2001 5:13 PM
To:	Lavorato, John; Whalley, Greg; Murray, Julia; King Jr., Frazier; Rice, Greek; Knepshield, Judy; Bouillion, James L.; Derrick Jr., James; Holsworth, Mark; Cheek, Charles; Stephens, Becky; Priddy, Janice; Earnest, Lanette; Barrow, Cynthia; Perkins, Mary; Cole, Kate; Callahan, Teresa; Pardue, Larry; Trujillo, Vicsandra; Ramirez, Angie EES; Hu, Sylvia; LaBaume, Wanda; Leo, Johnson; Aune, Stacey A.; Whiting, Greg; Davis, Hardie; Essig, Carol; Johnson, Kelly; Moore, Jerry Thomas; Pham, Lynda; Winn, Melinda; Maxey, Dave; SAP Master Data; Mintz, Jordan; Funk, Brenda L.; Hawley, Regina; Swafford, John; Lackey, Shelly; Wilcott, Robert
Cc:	Davis, Angela; Heinitz, Mary J.
Subject:	Notice of Intent to Dissolve

The following Delaware limited liability companies are being considered for dissolution.  Please let me know by Monday, October 15, 2001, if there is any reason not to proceed with the dissolution of these entities:

ECT-WR-B, L.L.C. (260-EWRB)
ECT-PR-B, L.L.C. (257-EPRC)

Thanks.

Lori Pinder
Supervisor, Corporate Services
and Assistant Secretary
1400 Smith St., Room 4802
Houston, Texas 77002
713.853-7291
713.646.8007 (Fax)


Steve,  Those were CPS's suggested changes, not mine.  I agree.  I don't know
what they want for Section 6 and Jim has agreed to get with CPS to get
further definition.  I also recommend pulling the language inserted in
Section 3 as Jim indicated we have already submitted all the estimates.  The
Bexar county venue is unacceptable and will be stricken.  David Marshall is
reviewing the insurance section and should have an answer today.

Steve HPL Schneider
03/30/2000 07:51 AM
To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: James R Haden/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: CPS Revisions

I have reviewed the changes which you have made.  Under Section 6, I have no
idea what we would submit.  Therefore I suggest that the additions under this
section be removed.  The insurance provision looks fine to me except that I
would like to see a larger umbrella amount, but you need to get David
Marshall to bless.  Is there a precedent for having Bexar County the point of
venue under this contract?  Upon your completion, please send 3 copies to me,
2 of which I will submit for execution to CPS.


Let me know your thoughts after you speak with him.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 08/03/2000
01:11 PM ---------------------------
From: Jeffrey A Shankman on 08/03/2000 09:25 AM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re:

Craig is coming by today to pitch a few ideas.  I'll let you know what he
comes up with (or if you'd like to be present when he does, let me know and
I'll get it on your calendar).  Do you have any preliminary ideas?

On another note, last night was a great idea, and I think it went a long
way.  Thanks for the intro to the group.

Thanks
Jeff

David W Delainey
08/02/2000 06:15 PM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

Jeff, we are thinking about how to finish the mid-market iniative and I need
to know if you want Breslau.  I would like him in a singular role and
accountability so I need to plan to incorporate him or not depending on if
you want him.

Regards
Delainey


----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 07/27/2000 08:22 AM -----

	Ryan Siurek@ENRON
	07/26/2000 12:22 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: 00-19

fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Ryan Siurek/Corp/Enron on 07/26/2000
12:22 PM ---------------------------

Kimberly Scardino
07/25/2000 08:35 PM
To: Ryan Siurek/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: 00-19

I assume you have the huge EITF write-up (53 paragraphs of background).  Here
is AA's (should we set up a time to talk about game plan on this - I know you
guys had a flurry of activity last quarter):

AA - Arthur Andersen
     Hot Topics
       EITF Action on Derivatives on a Company's Own Shares

EITF Action on Derivatives on a Company's Own Shares

July 21, 2000

At its July 19, 2000 meeting, the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF)
tentatively resolved how certain settlement features affect accounting for
equity derivative contracts entered into by a company on its own stock.
Specifically, the EITF sketched out a model governing how such features
affect whether the contract should be treated as (a) an equity instrument and
reported in stockholders, equity or (b) an asset or liability at fair value
with changes in fair value reported currently in earnings.

EITF Issue No. 00-19, "Determination of Whether Share Settlement is Within
the Control of the Issuer for Purposes of Applying Issue No. 96-13 ," was
taken up to address implementation of the EITF's March 16, 2000, consensus on
EITF Issue No. 00-7, "Application of EITF Issue No. 96-13 to Equity
Derivative Transactions That Contain Certain Provisions That Require Cash
Settlement If Certain Events Occur ." The final consensus in Issue 00-7
generally stated that equity derivative contracts that contained provisions
that implicitly or explicitly required net cash settlement outside of the
control of the company must be treated as assets and liabilities and carried
at fair value rather than equity instruments carried at original cost and
reported as part of permanent equity as provided for in EITF Issue No. 96-13,
"Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to, and Potentially
Settled in, a Company's Own Stock ."

The Task Force also tentatively provided an extended transition period for
existing contracts and contracts entered into before a final consensus is
reached. The goal is to reach a final consensus at the September 2000 EITF
meeting.

The Model

The model,s governing concept is that, for a contract to be accounted as
permanent equity, the contract's provisions should put the company,s
counterparty in no better position than the company,s common shareholders.
Specifically, the EITF tentatively concluded that contracts in a company,s
own stock, such as written puts or forward purchase contracts, that come
under the scope of Issue 96-13 and have net share settlement provisions that
keep a contract from being classified as an asset or liability must have the
following characteristics * otherwise the contract must be treated as an
asset or liability at fair value with changes in fair value reported
currently in earnings.

The contract must permit the company to settle net in shares, at its option,
in either registered or unregistered shares. (It was determined that the
ability to deliver registered shares was outside of the control of a company.)
The contract must contain an explicit cap on the number of shares to be
delivered in a net share settlement. This cap must exist even if the contract
terminates when the stock price reaches a stated price trigger. (The need for
a cap was determined to be critical in determining whether a company had
sufficient authorized and unissued shares to settle the contract.)
At contract inception and on an ongoing basis, the company must have
sufficient authorized but unissued shares available to settle the contract
considering all other claims on authorized shares for stock options,
convertibles, and other transactions that may require the issuance of stock.
(This requirement was deemed critical as the ability to have a request for
additional authorized shares approved by the shareholders was deemed outside
of the control of the company. In this context, "the company" is defined as
the company's management rather than its management and shareholders.)
There is no requirement in the contract to post collateral at any point in
the contract or for any reason.
There are no required cash payments to the counterparty (true-ups) if the net
shares initially delivered are insufficient to provide the counterparty with
full satisfaction of the amount due. However, true-ups may be included in the
contract if the company only, not the counterparty, can choose whether to
satisfy the true-up in shares or cash and the true-up is subject to the
explicit cap discussed in item 2.
There is no economic penalty in the contract for net share settlement that
would economically compel the company to settle in net cash. (The right to
increase the number of shares delivered based on the fair value differential
between registered shares and unregistered shares was not deemed to be a
penalty.)
There are no provisions in the contract that would indicate the counterparty
had creditor rights, or would otherwise contravene the objective of this
model that the counterparty,s rights would rank no higher than those of a
common shareholder. (Subject to future EITF discussions, it may be possible
to meet this criterion by having a legal letter addressing the issue or a
specific statement of this concept in the contract.)

Related Issues

There was also discussion of the provisions relating to termination and
settlement in the event of a merger or change in control. There was general
support for a position that, as long as the counterparty received the same
choice of compensation as other shareholders (for example, stock for stock,
stock and cash for stock, cash for stock), the fact that the counterparty
might receive cash in such circumstances would not preclude equity treatment
for the contract.

Similarly, in the event of nationalization or liquidation, a net cash
settlement of the same type afforded a common shareholder would not preclude
equity treatment for the contract.

In addition, counterparty rights that did not exceed rights of common
shareholders should be acceptable, for example, rights to sue for damages in
the event of misrepresentations or a breach of warrranties or if a company
simply refused to perform under the contract, as long as a common shareholder
would also have those rights.

With respect to events that would cause a contract that was compliant with
the model at inception to later become noncompliant (for example, because an
acquisition consumed enough authorized shares that otherwise were needed to
satisfy the contract), the EITF concluded that, at the time the contract is
no longer compliant, the fair value of the contract should be transferred
from equity to an asset or liability at fair value with prospective changes
in fair value reported currently in earnings. There would be no immediate
earnings effect at the time of this transfer.

Further, if, at a later date, sufficient shares were authorized to again
satisfy the contract, the carrying amount of the contract (that is, its fair
value) would be transferred back to equity and the contract treated as equity
prospectively to the extent the contract continues to comply with the model.
(The company would not be permitted to reverse the gains and losses in fair
value recognized in earnings during the period the contract was treated as an
asset or liability.)

Transition

The EITF tentatively concluded that all contracts entered into after the date
of a final consensus will have to comply with the model at contract inception
to achieve equity treatment. (The goal is to reach a final consensus at the
September 2000 EITF meeting.) For contracts entered into before the date of a
final consensus, a company will have until June 30, 2001, to modify the
contract to comply with the final consensus.

For example, if a company entered into a contract before the date of the
final consensus, the company will have until June 30, 2001, to obtain any
shareholder authorization of shares needed to satisfy the criteria or to
modify their contract for the other criteria or any EITF changes to the
tentative model.

Since a variety of viewpoints are discussed at Emerging Issues Task Force
(EITF) meetings and it is often difficult to characterize the conclusions,
the following minutes may differ in some respects from the final minutes
available from the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB).


I don't know if you received this or not.
---------------------- Forwarded by Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT on 02/08/2000
07:07 PM ---------------------------

Alan Aronowitz
02/08/2000 02:22 PM
To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Wayne Gresham
Subject: Re: EOL New Coal Product

FYI. Mark, how do you suggest we proceed?
---------------------- Forwarded by Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT on 02/08/2000
02:22 PM ---------------------------

Louise Kitchen
02/08/2000 12:08 PM
To: Wayne Gresham/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Forster/LON/ECT@ECT, Matthew
Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matthew Goering/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Linda K Loukanis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lynn E
Shivers/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Forster/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: EOL New Coal Product

If I understand correctly this means we will be altering the current GTCs and
counterparties will be reaccepting these as per legal advice we need to give
them notice of a change to GTCs prior to putting them on the web-site.  Legal
suggest 14 days - I think we should be fine with 7 - we do need a method of
notifying the change  - suggest ticker - legal would suggest a letter to all
those having accepted the GTC already.

This doesn't stop the new product launch as you can run with 2 GTCs for a
while if you want.

Louise

Wayne Gresham
08/02/2000 16:10
To: Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Forster/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Matthew Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matthew
Goering/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda K Loukanis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Lynn E Shivers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Louise Kitchen/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: EOL New Coal Product

Dale and Dave,

The Coal Group wants to add a new product, CSX Compliance, to EOL.  I have
reviewed and approved the attached short and long descriptions as well as
changes to our online GTC's.  The changes to the GTC's also reflect the
earlier changes we sent you but which were not implemented.  With this
revision, we will need only one set of GTC's applicable to Coal Products.
Please advise if you need anything additional.

Wayne


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 11/13/2000
08:13 AM ---------------------------

Shane.Dobbs@fctg.com on 11/10/2000 08:25:32 AM
To: wwilson@eng.auburn.edu, Tharpbl@eng.auburn.edu, domino@sonet.net,
hamptone@booksamillion.com, jwood@regionsbank.com, jmjaked@mindspring.com,
gwave85@hotmail.com, phillip.m.love@enron.com, poe77@earthlink.net,
stephaniepool@huntersystems.com
cc:
Subject: FW:

?
-----Original Message-----
From: Jourdan_Will
Sent:  Friday, November 10, 2000 8:24 AM
To: BIFP TRADERS
Subject:  FW:

?
-----Original Message-----
From: David Ray  [mailto:dray@montrad.com]
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2000 8:30  AM
To: William Hocutt; Jourdan_Will; Webb Jackson; Tracy Tiberia; Tim  Watkins;
TAYLOR MCELROY; Stuart Phillips; Stanley, Craig ; Stan HEAD Roberts;  Skew
Dawg; Sarah Hollis; Rusty Sexton; Rob Harper; Penn Wilder; Matt Skelton;
Marty Holt; Mark Smith; Lee Cobb; Kip Tullos; Kevin Judice; Ken Lott;
Jeffrey  Hollis; Jeff Maudsley; Jeanie Wahl; Jay Nichols; J2Andyj2@aol.com;
gsatterw@option-one.com; Greg Stanley; G. Alford; Ezell Webb; Emma; Ellen
Roberts; Eddie Pruett; Drew Porter; Dill, Bo; David Perry; Dave Ellis
(Crib);  Dan (Dial) Wrather; Dad; Clint Ray; Chris Garmon; Chad Medder; Brian
Moore;  Brenda Ford; Brandon Wallis; Bradley O Elliott; Bethany Self; B P
Mendheim;  Ashley Whittemore; Arch Lee; Annette Judice; Amanda Ray; Allen,
Trey; A D  Rogers; Adam Bloomston
Subject: Fw:

?
----- Original Message -----
From: John  Brinkley
To: Bobby Cummings (E-mail) ; Charles Brinkley  (E-mail) ; Kelley A. Wilson
(work) (E-mail) ; Melissa Brinkley (E-mail) ; Woody Marks (E-mail)  ; Adam
Walton ;  David Alexander Ray  ; David Nomberg ; David  Watson ; Gary Clarke
Burns, Jr. ; Michael Parks
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2000 8:16 AM
Subject: FW:

?
 - Morons1.gif


Below you will find the membership information you requested.

Please keep a copy of this e-mail message for future reference

WHAT YOU ENTERED:

Log-in Name:               UNKNOWN

First/Given Name:          DON

Last Name/Surname:         BAUGHMAN

E-mail address:            DON.BAUGHMAN@ENRON.COM

Alternate e-mail address:

WHAT WE FOUND:

Log-in Name:               DBAUGHM

Password:                  BLACKJACK1

Thank you for your interest in Travelocity.com. We hope to see you
on-line soon!

If you have any additional questions about your request, let

us know by replying to this message. Be sure to include the

text of this message along with your question so that we may

promptly respond to you.

***.


---------------------- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 08/30/99 10:30 AM
---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Melissa Graves                           08/30/99 10:19 AM

To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Connie Sutton/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Engage Energy US and Canada

Tana,

Please remove my name from this distribution and add Connie  Sutton.  I have
changed groups to the Gas Asset Team.

Thanks,
Melissa

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Tana Jones                           08/30/99 10:16 AM

To: Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jefferson D Sorenson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lucy
Ortiz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laurel Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrea
R Guillen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Willie Harrell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Larry Joe
Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melba Lozano/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Walker/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Dupre/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pamela Conner/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nidia Mendoza/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya
Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rod Nelson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tracy
Ngo/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Suttle/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patricia Cini/HOU/ECT@ECT, Russell
Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lesli Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Molly Mathes/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Brent Hendry/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Marie Heard/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shari
Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan
Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Solmonson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marilyn Colbert/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Yolanda Cordova-Gilbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diane Ellstrom/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lynn E
Shivers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill D Hare/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Robert B Cass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jason
Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dianne Seib/CAL/ECT@ECT, Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Anthony Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary G
Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT, Nella
Cappelletto/CAL/ECT@ECT, John J Lavorato/CAL/ECT@ECT, Derek Davies/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Engage Energy US and Canada

We have received the following executed documents from counterparty:

1.  First Amendment to ISDA Master Agreement dated as of 04/27/99 between ECT
and Engage Energy US, L.P. (i) making certain changes to setoff provisions
and (ii) changing Counterparty's exposure threshold; and

2.  ISDA Master Agreement (Multicurrency-Cross Border) between ECT Canada and
Engage Energy Canada, L.P. executed 05/03/99, effective as of 01/31/97.

Copies will be distributed.


We are going to have to push back the meeting to review the model if that
ok.  I need to finish up some work down here as well as review the model a
little more to make sure I am familiar with it. Thanks
Ben


Start Date: 3/6/01; HourAhead hour: 12;  HourAhead schedule download failed.
Manual intervention required.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001030612.txt


I attach for your review the final draft of the proposed Enron U.S. Foreign
Corrupt Practices Act Policy.  As I mentioned this morning, this draft is the
result of many months of work by Mary Nell Browning, Bob Williams, Joe Dilg
(Vinson and Elkins) and Martin Weinstein (Foley and Lardner).  I would like
to roll this policy out early in the new year and so would appreciate
receiving your comments as soon as possible but not later than the end of
this year.

Please feel free to call me if you have any questions or need any
information.  Thanks.

Rob


A quick reminder that Winebid.com's current auction, which includes many
large format bottles and some rare 19th-century Lafite-Rothschild, is now
open and begins closing Sunday, Dec. 30, at 9 p.m. U.S. Eastern Time. Here
are hot lots that so far have no bids.

1982 La Mission Haut-Brion, 6-liter, Robert M. Parker Jr. 99 pts,
reserve $3,360
http://www.winebid.com/os/itemhtml/ht728139.shtml?728139

1865 Lafite-Rothschild, 750 ml, Parker 98 pts, reserve $5,600
http://www.winebid.com/os/itemhtml/ht728160.shtml?728160

1900 Lafite-Rothschild, 750 ml, Michael Broadbent 5 stars, reserve $3,000
http://www.winebid.com/os/itemhtml/ht728162.shtml?728162

1997 Lange Sperss (Gaja), 5-liter, Parker 99 pts, reserve $1,900
http://www.winebid.com/os/itemhtml/ht728887.shtml?728887

1997 Harlan Estate, 1.5-liters, Parker 100 pts, reserve $1,000
http://www.winebid.com/os/itemhtml/ht729350.shtml?729350

1992 Paul Hobbs Hyde Vineyard, 3-liters, WS 93 pts, reserve $750
http://www.winebid.com/os/itemhtml/ht728066.shtml?728066

1997 Harlan Estate, 750 ml, Parker 100 pts, reserve $460
http://www.winebid.com/os/itemhtml/ht729356.shtml?729356

1997 Chateau St. Jean Cinq Cepages, 750 ml, Wine Spectator 96 pts,
reserve $70
http://www.winebid.com/os/itemhtml/ht729178.shtml?729178

1995 Rioja Vina El Pison Reserva (Artadi), 750 ml, Parker 99 pts,
reserve $150
http://www.winebid.com/os/itemhtml/ht728920.shtml?728920

1996 Dalla Valle Maya, 750 ml, WS 98 pts, reserve $320
http://www.winebid.com/os/itemhtml/ht729227.shtml?729227

1984 Ridge Monte Bello, 750 ml, James Laube 97 pts, reserve $95
http://www.winebid.com/os/itemhtml/ht729640.shtml?729640

If you click on a link in this email and it doesn't open properly in your
browser, try copying and pasting the link directly into your browser's
address or location field.

Forget your password?
http://www.winebid.com/os/send_password.shtml
To be removed from the mailing list, click here:
http://www.winebid.com/os/mailing_list.shtml
Be sure to visit the updates page for policy changes:
http://www.winebid.com/about_winebid/update.shtml


Dear Lisa:  As you requested, what follows is an example of  "exclusivity wording" that you might use in a contract.  Please note, however, that all contracts must be approved and initialled by Gerald Nemec or another attorney in EWS Legal before they are signed by an EWS officer. - Mary O.

Exclusivity.  In consideration of the efforts to be expended by Buyer in undertaking its due diligence review of the Project and Assets, Seller hereby grants to Buyer, during the Term of this Agreement (the "Exclusivity Period") the exclusive right to pursue the Project with Seller.  During the Exclusivity Period Seller shall not work with any other persons with regard to the Project or pursue any other transaction involving the Assets.


yeah i need to get you a boob job.  i like DD.  work out your lower back b/c
you are gonna have to carry my trophies around forever.


The preliminary should be out by the end of the day on the 2nd of January, not the 1st as noted below.

Sorry for the confusion.

Regards

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Wilson, Shona
Sent:	Friday, December 28, 2001 9:14 AM
To:	Abel, Chris; Andrews, Naveen; Apollo, Beth; Beck, Sally; Belden, Tim; Bowen Jr., Raymond; Bradford, William S.; Brooks, Loretta; Buy, Rick; Castleman, Kent; Causey, Richard; Cockrell, Rainier; Colwell, Wes; Curry, Wanda; Day, Misti; Delainey, David W.; Dietrich, Janet; Fallon, Jim; Frevert, Mark; Gold, Joe; Gossett, Jeffrey C.; Haedicke, Mark E.; Hagelmann, Bjorn; Hall, D. Todd; Hanson, Kristen J.; Hardy, Trey; Hayden, Frank; Helton, Susan; Hickerson, Gary; Hillis, Kimberly; Hodges, Georgeanne; Kaminski, Vince J; Kass, Michael; Kathol, Sherri; Killen, Faith; Kitchen, Louise; Lavorato, John; Lay, Kenneth; McKinney, Hal; McMahon, Jeffrey; Mills, Scott; Moscoso, Michael E.; Murphy, Ted; New, James; Piper, Greg; Port, David; Presto, Kevin M.; Schmidt, Darin; Schoppe, Tammie; Shepperd, Tammy R.; Talley, Darin; Ueckert, Allen W.; Valdez, Veronica; Whalley, Greg; White, Stacey W.; Whiting, Greg; Albrecht, Kristin; Ayala, Susie; Best, John; Brackett, Debbie R.; Branem Hansen, Trond; Brown, Matt A.; Bruce, Michelle; Carrington, Clara; Chang, Fran; Chew, Carol; Evans, Casey; Fondren, Mark; Gillis, Brian; Keiser, Kam; Latham, Jenny; Leuschen, Sam; Lewis,  Jon Paul; Mason, Heidi; Miralles, Albert; Oliver, David; Powell, John D.; Prejean, Frank; Ramesh, Ganapathy; Reeves, Kathy; Swinney, John; Taylor, Dimitri; Thomas, Sheri; Thrane-Nielsen, Didrik; Trevino, Susan; Vinson, Donald Wayne
Subject:	DPR reporting

Plans for the reporting of the consolidated DPR are:

For trading date Friday, December 28th - No DPR
For trading date Monday, December 31st - Our goal is to publish this in preliminary form by the end of the day Monday, 1/1/02 Tuesday, 1/2/02 .

Please call me if you have questions or comments about this reporting schedule.

I wish you all a happy New Year.

Regards

Shona Wilson
Director, Global Risk Operations
X39123


According to MSNBC's site, Dateline NBC will air at 7 p.m. tonight (Houston
time) the results of its joint investigation with the Washington Post on the
USDA's meat inspection system.  MSNBC's site today posted part 1 of the
Washington Post story and will post the other story tomorrow.

Robert E. Bruce
Senior Counsel
Enron Wholesale Services
T (713) 345-7780
F (713) 646-3393
robert.bruce@enron.com


sh"IN" - dig.......get it?  aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhh

----- Original Message -----
From: Fenner, Chet
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 5:11 PM
To: 'chad knipe'; Brian Constantine; EriK Wollam; Brad Corrier; Fenner, Chet; c.r.zander@att.net; Joe.Parks@bridgeline.net; lawfeder@msn.com
Subject: RE: man night again?

Where is this shin-dig?

-----Original Message-----
From: chad knipe [mailto:knipe3@msn.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 6:23 AM
To: Brian Constantine; EriK Wollam; Brad Corrier; Chet Fenner; c.r.zander@att.net; Joe.Parks@bridgeline.net; lawfeder@msn.com
Subject: Re: man night again?

in.

----- Original Message -----
From: Brian Constantine
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 8:26 AM
To: Erik Wollam; bcorrier@cox-internet.com; knipe3@msn.com; chet_fenner@bmc.com; c.r.zander@att.net; Joe.Parks@bridgeline.net; lawfeder@msn.com
Subject: RE: man night again?

I am IN!!! Would like to be there by 6:30 or so...maybe later. Zander is "out"...unless he brings Jake. Someone forward to Chambers...you know he's in.

BC

-----Original Message-----
From: Erik Wollam [mailto:erwollam@hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 5:25 PM
To: bcorrier@cox-internet.com; knipe3@msn.com; chet_fenner@bmc.com; c.r.zander@att.net; Joe.Parks@bridgeline.net; Brian Constantine; lawfeder@msn.com
Subject: man night again?

Zero response from my last effort on this matter. Are your emails working
men?

Zander called and suggested we attend the CCA crawfish boil function to be
held Thurday May 2, 2002. Reasonably priced event, beer, mud bugs and we can
sit back and watch pig win raffle prizes.

I'm in

e.

_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com


Anne

We have the following items that are contained in several key directories/servers that we are assuming will be moved.  If this needs moving or changes prior to the sale then we will require a team from networks that can work with each of us to properly document and transfer these items to a clean environment.  I will follow up tomorrow with you to ensure we have met your needs.

m:fundamental analysis directory
Contains all of the fundamental analysis and application.   The fundamental analysis/databases contains documentation of all the process and applications we use.

m:electric directory & power2 directories
This directory contains the some of our trading information and regional data.  A directory under this one call swapco has been created and a all key apps used by traders that were on their hard drives and home directories have been moved here.
This directory also hosts the traders models, position managers, one off spreadsheets and custom databases.

Calgary Power, East Power Fundamentals and West Power Fundamentals
These server/servers host and contains all of our fundamental material and applications.

m:eprojects
Contains documentation on the core enpower, scheduling, settlement and trading systems.

m:eservices
Contains all details of our services agreements.

Please provide additional direction if we need a plan for the network and infrastructure requirements for the east, west and Canada operations.


Any GCP adjustments will be highlighted in blue.

Best Rgds.

Samuel x3-9890 (GCP Team)
Enron Net Works _ Global Data Management

From: Walter Guidroz/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/25/2001 04:53 PM
To: Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel
Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/ENRON@enronXgate,
Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli
Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate, Cynthia Clark/ENRON@enronXgate, Enron Europe
Global CounterParty/LON/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/ENRON@enronXgate, Tom
Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Claudia Clark/ENRON@enronXgate, William S
Bradford/ENRON@enronXgate, Lisa Lees/ENRON@enronXgate, Juana
Fayett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jana Morse/Corp/Enron@Enron, Trang Le/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Paul Maley/LON/ECT@ECT, Sonya Clarke/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim Davies/LON/ECT@ECT,
Karen O'Day/ENRON@enronXgate, Tanya Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Kelly
Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron, Brian Lindsay/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, EOL Call Center@ECT, Bill D Hare/HOU/ECT@ect, Amy
Heffernan/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Molly LaFuze/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Danny Clark/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron, Teresa
Mandola/ENRON@enronXgate, Bill Kyle/ENRON@enronXgate, Amber Ebow/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: EOL approvals, 04-25-01

Please see attached.


----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 02/28/2001 02:54 PM -----

	MBD <MDay@GMSSR.com>
	02/15/2001 01:20 PM

		 To: Alan.Comnes@enron.com, Chris.H.Foster@enron.com,
Christian.Yoder@enron.com, Christopher.F.Calger@enron.com,
Cynthia.Sandherr@enron.com, dleff@enron.com, David.W.Delainey@enron.com,
dbenevid@enron.com, dblack@enron.com, Elizabeth.Sager@enron.com,
etilney@enron.com, Eric.Thode@enron.com, gsavage@enron.com,
Greg.Wolfe@enron.com, Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com, Jeffrey.T.Hodge@enron.com,
JKLAUBER@LLGM.COM, Joe.Hartsoe@enron.com, John.J.Lavorato@enron.com,
John.Neslage@enron.com, jwhalan@enron.com, Kathryn.Corbally@enron.com,
Keith.Holst@enron.com, Kristin.Walsh@enron.com, Leslie.Lawner@enron.com,
Linda.Robertson@enron.com, Marcia.A.Linton@enron.com,
Margaret.Carson@enron.com, Mark.Palmer@enron.com, msunde@enron.com,
Mary.Hain@enron.com, Mary.Schoen@enron.com, MBD <MDay@GMSSR.com>,
Michael.Tribolet@enron.com, msmith1@enron.com, Mike.Grigsby@enron.com,
nbresnan@enron.com, Paul.Kaufman@enron.com, Phillip.K.Allen@enron.com,
Rebecca.W.Cantrell@enron.com, Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com,
Richard.Shapiro@enron.com, Rob.Bradley@enron.com, Robert.Badeer@enron.com,
Robert.C.Williams@enron.com, Robert.Frank@enron.com,
Robert.Johnston@enron.com, Sandra.McCubbin@enron.com, sstoness@enron.com,
Shelley.Corman@enron.com, Steve.C.Hall@enron.com, Steve.Walton@enron.com,
Steven.J.Kean@enron.com, Susan.J.Mara@enron.com, Tim.Belden@enron.com,
Tom.Briggs@enron.com, Travis.McCullough@enron.com, Vance.Meyer@enron.com,
vsharp@enron.com, William.S.Bradford@enron.com, "'Harry.Kingerski@enron.com'"
<Harry.Kingerski@enron.com>, James.D.Steffes@enron.com
		 cc: BTC <BCragg@GMSSR.com>, JMB <JBennett@GMSSR.com>, "'Scott Govenar, Enron
lobbyist'" <sgovenar@govadv.com>
		 Subject: Enron legislative package

Here are 4 of the five legislative proposals our office has been asked to
draft.  The only one missing is no. 4, the expedited generation siting
proposal, which will have to be worked on more as we have just received
extensive comments from ENA and outside counsel (McCutchen).  By separate
cover, I will send Jeff Dasovich the summary letter desribing the proposals.
If changes are required, please contact Brian Cragg of our office.
(bcragg@gmssr.com)

Thank you.

Mike Day

 <<PART5.DOC>>  <<PART3.DOC>>  <<PART2.DOC>>  <<PART1.DOC>>

 - PART5.DOC
 - PART3.DOC
 - PART2.DOC
 - PART1.DOC


Scott/Cameron:

OK, wondering why there ain't no charges on your credit card from our
FABULOUS trip to Squaw Valley?  I just found out that they're all on
mine!!?!?!?   I had the best time up there, but I couldn't figure out how it
coulda cost $1700.  Just called them to inquire.  They said:  There's no
mistake those are all the carges for rooms 432 and 450.  They're sending
receipts.  Unreal.

Best,
Jeff


Attached for your review is the latest press release announcing Rebecca
Mark's resignation from the Enron board and an employee memo we would like to
send via email to all Enron employees.  If you have any comments or changes,
please let me know by noon.

Thank you.
Karen
x39757


I'm estimating a $50,000 prepay to Reliant this Thursday.  Cash is up $.20 from Friday.  I may need to make the prepay on Wed again.  I'll have a better idea after 9:00 AM tomorrow.


Hey Dave.  Hope your weekend went well with the girls.  I got a call from my
mom tonight that Cita was in the Hospital again.  According to my mom she is
doing okay now.  I called Cita on Friday and she said she just felt like she
was getting a cold but apparently she went in for the heart failure thing
again?  Is that correct.?  Anyway,  I am working the night shift tonight so I
will give her a call tommorow afternoon after I wake up.   I called and left
you a message letting you know that i am probably not going to Vegas.
Everyone kind of flaked out.  So, I will be around the weekend of the Super
Bowl and was wondering what you guys might be doing for it.  Also I was going
to see if you and Karen would maybe be interested in going up to Big Bear to
go skiing for the day on Friday or Saturday.  I thought it might be fun.  I
have an extra set of ski's that I was thinking about bringing and leaving
down there anyway so I could go without having to hassle with Rentals.  So,
let me know if you have any interest in doing that and if you have anything
going for the Super Bowl.  Tell Cita I love her and tell Bob to get in
shape!  See ya soon!


484809
kate, i talked to mike on this deal and it should be august.  i just want to
let you know to make sure it gets changed.

thanks and have a merry christmas!

kerri


Current word on the street (as of this morning anyway):

Vote by CPUC to suspend direct access will be put off until at least June 28
meeting
Commissioner Bilas will draft an alternative that does not suspend direct
access
Drafts of the decisons are not available
Sacramento leadership has told Lynch, President of CPUC, that there should be
no vote to suspend direct access as long as negotiations on legislation for a
comprehensive solution continue (these include direct access)

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854


pls print.  thanks.  DF
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 01/31/2000
05:24 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Mary Kay Miller                           01/31/2000 12:43 PM

To: Maria Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum
cc:

Subject: Revised Speech Notes

These are the "words" that go with the bullets--  see if anything strikes you
incorrectly or needing more--thanks MK
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron on 01/31/2000
12:42 PM ---------------------------

Shelley Corman
01/27/2000 05:20 PM
To: Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Revised Speech Notes


<http://www.energynewslive.com/ImageLogServlet/content/email/graphic s/header.jpg?email=Mike.Grigsby@enron.com>

 	  	 Dear Mike,

It's been one year since ENL began broadcasting - log on Tuesday and join the Energy News Live celebration. We've scheduled a full day of coverage and special guests to commemorate our anniversary.

At the top of the list is our continuing live coverage of the 18th World Energy Congress in Buenos Aires, Argentina. International Correspondent Wolfgang Vale will bring us an interview with European Union Energy Commissioner Loyola De Palacio. Join us on Tuesday as De Palacio discusses the reliability of energy supplies for Europe.

The Washington bureau will have the latest on the anthrax situation and how it's impacting Congress. At noon ET Tuesday, the bureau is expected to talk with Senate Energy Chairman Jeff Bingaman about the chance the Senate will consider energy legislation before Congress adjourns for the year.

Also from the Washington bureau on Tuesday, Energy Daily Publisher Llewellyn King will give us his thoughts on where energy legislation stands in Congress. King will drop by during the 4:00 p.m. ET newscast.

Former FERC Chairman James Hoecker will also speak with us from Washington on Tuesday. Hoecker will discuss the newest FERC nominee, Joe Kelliher, and what the Commission accomplished with its recently concluded RTO week during the 10:00 a.m. ET newscast.

The Houston bureau also has some great guests scheduled on Tuesday. Petroleum Argus, Inc. President Dan Massey will join us during the 1:00 p.m. ET newscast. He'll discuss the crisis in risk management over the last year.

We'll also hear from Merrill Lynch Lead Energy Analyst Donato Eassey. He'll drop by the Houston bureau to discuss the difficulties of this year, and where the energy industry goes from here. Eassey is penciled in during the 2:00 p.m. ET newscast tomorrow.

ENL's Kym McNicholas will have more on the California Department of Water Resources from the West Coast bureau on Tuesday. The CDWR is holding a workshop in Sacramento to explain new revenue requirements and how the factors involved will bring down costs.

Kym says we'll also have more from former U.S. Secretary of State George Shultz and his thoughts on deregulation. We'll have details from these stories and more on Tuesday from the West Coast bureau.

From Columbus, Ohio, AEP Spokesperson Pat Hemlepp will discuss AEP's earnings report due out Tuesday. Hemlepp will also bring us an update on changes at AEP's payment processing center in the wake of the anthrax scares, and the importance of electronic payments, during the 11:00 a.m. ET newscast.

Keep in mind things are subject to change at a moment's notice. Occasionally guests cancel or change time slots. We'll continue to do our best to keep you updated on future interviews and events.

Be sure to watch our newscasts every business day - 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. ET, at the top of each hour.

 	   <http://www.energynewslive.com/content/email/graphics/signature.jpg>
 	 Jay Rickerts, EnergyNewsLive.com Anchor

View today's Energy Wrap video <http://www.energynewslive.com/NavController?referer=email.jsp&acti on=dailyWrap&email=Mike.Grigsby@enron.com>
(Requires Windows Media Player <http://www.microsoft.com/windows/mediaplayer/en/download/Win32IE4x 86.asp> or Real Player <http://www.real.com>)

Experience all that Williams Energy News Live has to offer! <http://www.energynewslive.com>

If you are receiving this letter for the first time and wish to continue,
subscribe now <mailto:join-enl-members-html@estutenws11.energy.williams.com>

To stop receiving this letter, unsubscribe now <http://www.energynewslive.com/unsubscribe.jsp?email=&type=H>

If you are having trouble receiving this e-mail, please let us know <mailto:ecenter@energynewslive.com> or call
(800) WILLIAMS (800-945-5426) weekdays, 7am-7pm CST.

Comments? Suggestions? Let us know <mailto:ecenter@energynewslive.com> or call (800) WILLIAMS (800-945-5426) weekdays, 7am-7pm CST.

Copyright 2001 Williams Energy News Live, LLC. All Rights Reserved.


Fabian:
Here are the answers to your questions.  Please give us a call if you have
any more questions. Thanks!
Ben


The fastest way for the Feds to fix the national super highway system to
dirt path transition at the California border (in terms of physical capacity
and regulatory schemes) is to FERC the PG&E and SoCal backbone systems.  Let
the CPUC reg gas from the SF and LA city gate.  FERC would get the high
pressure lines from the border, which is the way it is in almost every other
state in the lower 48. Integrate California in the national gas markets.

Repeal the Henshaw amendment, or encourage PG&E/Sempra to file. I think
sending pixs of Lynch and Hebert would be more than enough encouragement.
At least one of them is thinking of such a filing.

It would set off WW III in the California /DC dialogue and PC/ utility
discussions.

Bob

Ps.  In terms of bypass, it would result in a pretty level playing field to
the city gate in terms of rate designs and operational rules.


Nothing from Leatha.  Any news there?

Kay