Ava, LA was Socal mtg.
San Fran was Interconnect mtg
Omaha was mtg on Bushton and
SLA mtg,. Thanks Lynn
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)

-----Original Message-----
From: Garcia, Ava <Ava.Garcia@ENRON.com>
To: Blair, Lynn <Lynn.Blair@ENRON.com>
Sent: Mon Oct 29 13:41:35 2001
Subject: San Francisco/Los Angeles/ Omaha

Lynn, I need to know what your trips where in reference to.

Thanks,
Ava


You need to read this article...if I haven't ever forwarded it to you before.
Go to www.fastcompany.com
select magazine archives, then themes, then careers, then the topic "finding your calling", then select the article "Are you deciding on Purpose"
Take care,Mo.


Do you have a copy of Maureen's deal ticket?
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 09/08/2000 10:58
AM ---------------------------

Elizabeth L Hernandez
09/08/2000 09:58 AM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Bay State

Do you know if we should be charging a demand on deal 233091.  Please let me
know.

---------------------- Forwarded by Elizabeth L Hernandez/HOU/ECT on
09/08/2000 09:57 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Shawna Johnson @ ENRON                           09/05/2000 11:30 AM

To: Elizabeth L Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Bay State

Elizabeth,

This is an East deal.

By the way, thank you so much again for your help during my vacation.  I have
just reviewed my e-mails and saw that you have been quite busy!!  Thank you
so much for  your quick response to settlelments and client services needs.

 :  )
smj
---------------------- Forwarded by Shawna Johnson/Corp/Enron on 09/05/2000
11:22 AM ---------------------------

Isabel Y Resendez@ECT
09/05/2000 10:40 AM
To: Shawna Johnson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Bay State

Shawna,
I am Isabel and I work in Gas Settlements.  Could you help me out with the
following?

Deal # 233091 for Bay State is charging a demand charge every month.
Accourding to Bay State Enron should not be charging demand charges.  Could
you let me know if this correct.  Should Enron be charging demand charges?
Maureen Smith is down as the trader on the deal.  However, I am not sure if
that is correct.  Please let me know if you are not the correct person to
send this note too.
Thank you for your help!
isabel
3-0440


The expiry should be 2003, and it's been changed. Thanks for catching that.

Kate

	From:  Kimberly Allen                           02/22/2001 01:08 PM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Incorrect Expiry Date

Your so smart:) #522101.01

   Kate Symes                02/22/2001 02:59 PM

To: Kimberly Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Incorrect Expiry Date

I don't see a deal number.....? Is it a missing deal?

	From:  Kimberly Allen                           02/22/2001 12:58 PM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Incorrect Expiry Date

Kate, this trade has an expiry date of 2001 when it is suppose to be 2003.
Mike Driskil entered the trade. I have BPA's confirm that also verifies and
the notes in the bottom of the comment section. Please change if correct.

Thanks,

Kimberly


There would appear to be no downside to this request.  If you need anything, please call.

Eric

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kitchen, Louise
Sent:	Friday, June 29, 2001 5:10 PM
To:	Palmer, Mark; Thode, Eric
Subject:	Opportunity for you to be interviewed by authors of a Deloitte & Touche Book on e Business

Do I do this?  Probably will unless you guys say no - let me know by Monday.
Thanks
Louise
---------------------- Forwarded by Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT on 06/29/2001 05:09 PM ---------------------------
From:	George Wood/ENRON@enronXgate on 06/29/2001 09:09 AM
To:	Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:	Tammie Schoppe/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject:	Opportunity for you to be interviewed by authors of a Deloitte & Touche Book on e Business

Louise - first congratulations on your new boy Scott - Marcus has been keeping me posted and I even saw those great photos on his desk.  I don't think we have met; I work for EPMI in NEPOOL with John Llodra and report to Ed Baughman.

I am writing to ask if you would speak with my brother-in-law, Dave Gautschi, a partner with Deloitte & Touche, who is co-authoring a book on e-businesses called Net Markets (see attached outline and reproduction of the cover).  The focus of the book is to " ?? take a business executives perspective on the implications of B2B eMarketplaces on their business and overall business environment globally.  It will lead the reader through the basic options for implementing real valuable B2B tools and technologies.  It will then move to more and more complex AND valuable B2B opportunities.  More importantly, it will identify and articulate the day-to-day business IMPLICATIONS of Ebusiness."

Dave, a PhD in mathematics (go figure), a former marketing professor, a folk singer (he leads our family in song fests) and just a great guy is intrigued/impressed with Enron on Line (who isn't) and would very much like your insights.  I believe the exposure to both Deloitte and the readers of this book would be great for Enron in general and Enron On Line specifically.

If you are available please call his research assistant Mike Russell at 206-215-4285 to arrange a time to talk (they will be very responsive as their manuscript deadline is late July).  I am reachable today on my cell at 617-733-8713 and on vacation next week but Claudette Harvey will know where to reach me.

Thanks for your consideration and enjoy your new young one (kids are great, I have two)

George "Woody" Wood

 << File: book summary.doc >>  << File: cover of book.pdf >>


Hi Brian!  How nice to hear from you.  Congrats on being an uncle.  Scott is
a good-looking baby!  Yes, I'm pretty psyched about little Grayson; she is a
sweetie!  Karin and Jim are anxious to give me a refresher course on
babysitting skills.  I told them that when my niece is old enough to
understand the command "Go find your shoes and I'll help you put them on,"
I'll be happy to take her off their hands for a weekend!  I too am in no rush
to have kids.  While my boyfriend is a great guy and loves children, somehow
I just can't imagine him hanging around the house helping with diapers!

I am so glad you're enjoying Tampa.  Picking up and moving can be a great
thing sometimes.  I will never regret leaving Austin for Houston.  There is
just so much here I enjoy doing and my social life is a whole lot better.
The job is absolutely crazy.  If you ever watch "ER," that is usually what my
day looks like, only without all the blood!  Here at Enron Gas Pipeline Group
I work as the only lawyer for a very busy commercial team.  We sit in an open
work area and it is chaotic every day.  But it's a good crash course in
business for me, and my clients are wonderful.

Do take some study breaks and keep in touch!  E-mail is a wonderful thing.

Time to hit the tennis courts.

Love,
Susan

"Brian Scott" <brianscott67@hotmail.com> on 05/10/2000 06:25:06 PM
To: Susan.Scott@enron.com
cc:

Subject:

Susan,

Hi, how are you doing? I got your e-mail address from Aunt Sheila. I had
earlier gotten her e-mail address from my Dad and sent her an e-mail after
hearing about Karin giving birth. So how about that! Are you excited about
being an Aunt? I can accept being an uncle much more than being a dad. I am
in no hurry to have kids. Actually, I am in no hurry to get married. I think
I would be  good dad, although I would have to settle down a bit. But that
won't happen anytime soon, as I am enjoying the Tampa area too much. I moved
down here last August and am loving it.

I just got done taking the CPA exam and am scheduled to take the FL Bar exam
in July. So I will not be enjoying FL too much for the next few months. I
just thought I would drop you a line and see how you are doing. How is
Houston? Are you still enjoying it there? How's the job? Have you made
partner yet? Have you seen much of Grayson since her birth? Well enough ?'s,
I have to go. Let me know how you are doing! Take care.

Your cousin,

Brian
________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com


FYI.  Thanks. Lynn

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hass, Glen
Sent:	Wednesday, August 15, 2001 10:49 AM
To:	Kilmer III, Robert; Lokey, Teb; Hass, Glen; Darveaux, Mary; Pryor, Tony; Pavlou, Maria; Schoolcraft, Darrell; Betancourt, Ramona ; Blair, Lynn; Brown, Elizabeth; Harris, Steven; Corman, Shelley; Watson, Kimberly; Lindberg, Lorraine; Lokay, Michelle; Lohman, TK; Donoho, Lindy; Miller, Mary Kay; Kirk, Steve
Subject:	FW: TW 637 Meeting

Attached is the summary of our filing position and proposals for tariff and service revisions and a summary of protests for review prior to our discussions on Tuesday.  gh

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Donoho, Lindy
Sent:	Tuesday, August 14, 2001 11:25 AM
To:	Hass, Glen; Darveaux, Mary
Cc:	Lokey, Teb
Subject:	FW: TW 637 Meeting

Do either of you have info concerning the intervenors/protestors and their issues that could be distributed electronically before next Tuesday?  Glen, maybe you could also distribute you summary of TW's filing with that info.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lindberg, Lorraine
Sent:	Tuesday, August 14, 2001 11:03 AM
To:	Donoho, Lindy
Subject:	RE: TW 637 Meeting

Lindy - Is there a way for someone to compile a list of shippers who protested and intervened in our compliance filing and what the issues are prior to this meeting?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Donoho, Lindy
Sent:	Tuesday, August 14, 2001 10:40 AM
To:	Kilmer III, Robert; Lokey, Teb; Hass, Glen; Darveaux, Mary; Pryor, Tony; Pavlou, Maria; Schoolcraft, Darrell; Betancourt, Ramona ; Blair, Lynn; Brown, Elizabeth
Cc:	Harris, Steven; Corman, Shelley; Watson, Kimberly; Lindberg, Lorraine; Lokay, Michelle; Lohman, TK
Subject:	TW 637 Meeting

Please plan to attend a meeting on Tuesday, August 21st from 2:30 to 4:30 in 49C2 (video) to discuss the letter TW received recently concerning our 637 filing.  If you have not seen a copy of the brief letter, dated August 8, 2001, it reads as follows:

	"On August 15, 2000, Transwestern Pipeline Company (Transwestern) filed pro forma tariff sheets in Docket No. RP00-490-000 in compliance with Order No. 637.  Protests were filed in this proceeding.  Transwestern and its customers have been meeting to attempt to resolve some of the issues raised in the protests.  Staff understands that Transwestern may file revised pro forma tariff sheets if there is agreement with its customers on the matters at issue.

	Accordingly, you are encouraged to finalize discussions with your customers and file any revised pro forma tariff sheets in the near future.  Otherwise, Staff will proceed to process your filing based on the pro forma tariff sheets submitted on August 15, 2000."

We would like to discuss our strategy in response to this letter.


Start Date: 4/27/01; HourAhead hour: 11;  HourAhead schedule download failed.
Manual intervention required.


I checked with Sara, and Thursday at 2:30 pm is OK with us.  Just let us know
if the time changes.  Should we come to Bill's office?


HEY GUYS. IS THIS STUFF BS OR WHAT? LET ME KNOW YOUR OPINION SO I DON'T MAKE
AN ASS OUT OF MYSELF AND FORWARD THIS TO ANYONE ELSE.

GT

> -----Original Message-----
> From: carpenter, tobin
> Sent: Monday, September 11, 2000 9:59 AM
> To: battles, bill; galindo, julie; halderman, ralf; helton, debi; ivy,
> larry; polski, mary beth; pormprasong, louis; shelby, jimmie; tamez,
> daniel; Townsend, George
> Subject: FW: Fw: AOL
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ross, deborah
> Sent: Monday, September 11, 2000 8:51 AM
> To: arnold, nikki; breaux, sherry; cameron, cathy; carpenter, tobin;
> ellis, mike; galindo, julie; gutierrez, belinda; hauser, bonnie; havens,
> liz; helton, debi; hyder, tarryl; krenek, david; lennon, priscilla;
> polski, mary beth; lybecker, teri
> Subject: FW: Fw: AOL
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Deb Ross [SMTP:dross314@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2000 4:50 PM
> To: Rhonda2702@aol.com; elledger@laketravis.txed.net;
> tinamartinez@maximus.com; Sharon_m_swan@uhc.com; cbraden@aol.com;
> panama@centuryinter.net; AGolden519@aol.com; Wm1comp@aol.com;
> dross@manorisd.net; djjones@dmg.maxinc.com; tx4tune@msn.com;
> julbug@bellsouth.net; johnsonkc@earthlink.net; rpcnsb@aol.com;
> Wendy.bagwell@thementornetwork.com
> Subject: Fwd: Fw: AOL
>
>
>
>
> >From: "mary newcomb" <mnewcomb@tsixroads.com>
> >To: "RICK NEWCOMB" <rnewcomb@tsixroads.com>, "robin"
> <rturner172@aol.com>,
> >       "Robin Turner" <rturner@sofamordanek.com>,        "Lyndsey
> Newcomb"
> ><lyndseyallison@hotmail.com>,        "DEB ROSS" <dross314@hotmail.com>,
> >"Shanklin" <shanklin@tsixroads.com>
> >Subject: Fw: AOL
> >Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2000 18:55:31 -0500
> >
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Carley Roberts <croberts@tsixroads.com>
> >To: Janet Holley <bholley@tsixroads.com>; Daniel Mathis
> ><dbmathis@swbell.net>; Denese Smith <CDS821@aol.com>; Jennifer Yarbrough
> ><jcyarbrough@bcbsal.org>; Tammie Harvill <tharvi@tsixroads.com>; Christi
> >Smith <titanic29@webtv.net>; Mary Newcomb <mnewcomb@tsixroads.com>;
> Lyndsey
> >Newcomb <lyndseyallison@hotmail.com>; Rick Newcomb
> ><rnewcomb@tsixroads.com>;
> >Joe Roberts <jroberts@tsixroads.com>; Robin Turner <rturner172@aol.com>
> >Date: Thursday, September 07, 2000 7:49 PM
> >Subject: Fw: AOL
> >
> >
> > >
> > >----- Original Message -----
> > >From: bobby wade holley <bholley@tsixroads.com>
> > >To: carley roberts <croberts@tsixroads.com>
> > >Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 7:27 PM
> > >Subject: Fw: AOL
> > >
> > >
> > >>
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: rick gray <rgray@avsia.com>
> > >> To: BOBBY HOLLEY <bholley@tsixroads.com>; CRAIG RHODES
> ><bayley@avsia.com>;
> > >> GARY AUSTIN <gcaustin@usit.net>; jessie godwin
> > >> <jsgodwin@freedom2000net.com>; JOE RINEHART <VAGABOND@tsixroads.com>;
>
> >ROY
> > >> WRIGHT <wroy@tsixroads.com>; STAN <popfly@freedom2000net.com>; SHERRY
> >GRAY
> > >> <sgray@fleetwoodretail.com>; steve tucker <steventucker@avsia.com>;
> TIM
> > >> BARNES <tbarnes@avsia.com>; tony fondren <tonyf@usit.net>; will
> > >> <willdeb@tsixroads.com>
> > >> Date: Thursday, September 07, 2000 6:13 PM
> > >> Subject: Fw: AOL
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >> >----- Original Message -----
> > >> >From: "Nathan Voeller" <voeller@uswest.net>
> > >> >To: <AHen855423@aol.com>; "Tiffany" <amanda.dixon.@us.zurich.com>;
> >"Barb
> > >> >Stoxen" <barbi111@yahoo.com>; "Bryan Haag" <bdmm@uswest.net>; "Brad
> or
> > >> >Debbie Fuller" <blfuller@boink.net>; "bryan radin"
> > ><nbradin@email.msn.com>;
> > >> >"Cammy Bosch" <cbosch@peoplepc.com>; <CheneyLane@gateway.net>;
> >"Christy
> > >> >Huerta" <HuertaC@cookministries.org>; "curt kressley"
> > >> ><mrdiagnle@prodigy.net>; "Donavan" <dvoeller@pioneer.state.nd.us>;
> > >> >"douglasm1" <douglasm1@email.msn.com>; "Drewbears"
> > >> ><Drewbears@email.msn.com>; "Dwight Wangen" <DWangen@webtv.net>;
> > >"Elizabeth
> > >> >Mason" <lizard31@home.com>; "Erlene Heupel" <eheupel@mohs.org>;
> "Faith
> > >> >Voeller" <lil_chicn@yahoo.com>; "Jeff Case" <jeffcase@dwx.com>; "Jo
> >Ann
> > >> >Pritchett" <jpritchett@lightspeed.net>; "Joan Voeller"
> > >> ><voeller@btigate.com>; "John Voeller" <dirtboy17@hotmail.com>;
> "Laura
> > >> >DeOrnellas" <lauradeo@one-eleven.net>; <MadiMorg@aol.com>; "mande"
> > >> ><soccermom@atlnet.com>; "Mary Freisz" <maryf@btigate.com>;
> > >> ><Mtsothmoon@aol.com>; "Neomi" <neomiv@dwx.com>; "Nicole Voeller"
> > >> ><nicole_voeller@educ8.org>; <NVoeller12@MSN.com>; "Sandy"
> > >> ><jpritchett@dellnet.com>; <Stephi711@aol.com>; <SusZooo@aol.com>;
> >"Tarryn
> > >> >Soberg" <tarrynsoberg@hotmail.com>; "Tad" <tjp4460@dellnet.com>
> > >> >Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2000 9:01 AM
> > >> >Subject: Fw: AOL
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >>
> > >> >> ----- Original Message -----
> > >> >>
> > >> >> >>>
> > >> >> > > > >  >>> Let's hope it works,  if it doesn't..no loss
> > >> >> > > > >  >>>
> > >> >> > > > >  >>> To all of my friends, I do not usually forward
> messages
> > >but
> > >> >> this
> > >> >> > > > >  >>> is from my good friend Pearlas Sanborn and she really
>
> >is
> > >an
> > >> >> > > > >  >>> attorney.....If she says that this will work - it
> WILL
> > >work.
> > >> >> > > > >  >>> After all,what have you  got to lose?
> > >> >> > > > >  >>>
> > >> >> > > > >  >>> SORRY EVERYBODY.....JUST HAD TO TAKE THE CHANCE!!!
> > >> >> > > > >  >>>  I'm an attorney, and I know the law. This thing is
> for
> > >> real.
> > >> >> > > > >  >>> Rest assured, AOL and Intel will follow through with
> >their
> > >> >> > promises
> > >> >> > > >for
> > >> >> > > > >  >>> fear of  facing multimillion dollar class action suit
> > >> similar
> > >> >> to
> > >> >> > > >the
> > >> >> > > >one
> > >> >> > > > >  >>> filed by Pepsico against General Electric not too
> long
> > >ago.
> > >> >> > > > >  >>> We're not going to help them out with their e-mail
> beta
> > >test
> > >> >> > > >without
> > >> >> > > > >  >>> getting a little something for our time. My brother's
> > >> >> girlfriend
> > >> >> > > >got
> > >> >> > > >in
> > >> >> > > > >  >>> on this a few months ago. When I went to visit him
> for
> >the
> > >> >> > > >Baylor/UT
> > >> >> > > > >  >>> game,she showed me her check. It was for the sum of
> > >> $4,324.44
> > >> >> and
> > >> >> > > >was
> > >> >> > > > >  >>> stamped "Paid In Full". Like I said before, I know
> the
> > >law,
> > >> >and
> > >> >> > > >this
> > >> >> > > >is
> > >> >> > > > >  >>> for real. If you don't believe me you can email her
> at
> > >> >> > > > >  >>> jpiltman@baylor.edu.  She's eager to answer any
> >questions
> > >> you
> > >> >> > guys
> > >> >> > > >might
> > >> >> > > > >  >>> have.
> > >> >> > > > >  >>> Intel and AOL are now discussing a merger which would
> >make
> > >> >them
> > >> >> > the
> > >> >> > > > >  >>> largest Internet company and in an effort make sure
> >that
> > >AOL
> > >> >> > > >remains
> > >> >> > > >the
> > >> >> > > > >  >>> most widely used program, Intel and AOL are running
> an
> > >> e-mail
> > >> >> > beta
> > >> >> > > > >  >>> test.  When you forward this e-mail to friends, Intel
>
> >can
> > >> and
> > >> >> > will
> > >> >> > > >track
> > >> >> > > > >  >>> it (if you are a Microsoft Windows user) for a two
> week
> > >time
> > >> >> > > >period.
> > >> >> > > > >  >>> For every person that you forward this e-mail to,
> > >Microsoft
> > >> >> will
> > >> >> > > >pay
> > >> >> > > >you
> > >> >> > > > >  >>> $203.15.  For every person that you sent it to that
> > >forwards
> > >> >it
> > >> >> > on,
> > >> >> > > > >  >>> Microsoft will pay you $156.29 and for every third
> >person
> > >> >that
> > >> >> > > >receives
> > >> >> > > > >  >>> it, you will be paid $17.65. Within two weeks, Intel
> >will
> > >> >> contact
> > >> >> > > >you
> > >> >> > > > >  >>> for your address and then send you a check. I thought
> >this
> > >> >was
> > >> >> a
> > >> >> > > >scam
> > >> >> > > > >  >>> myself, but a friend of my good friend's Aunt
> Patricia,
> > >who
> > >> >> works
> > >> >> > > >at
> > >> >> > > > >  >>> Intel actually got a check for $4,543.23 by
> forwarding
> > >this
> > >> >> > e-mail.
> > >> >> > > > >  >>> Try it, what have you got to lose????
> > >> >> > > > >  >>>
> > >> >> > > > >  >>>
> > >> >> > > > >  >>>
> > >> >> > > > >  >>>
> > >> >> > > > >  >>
> > >> >> > > > >  >>
> > >> >> > > > >  >>
> > >> >> > > > >  >Melissa J. Haahr
> > >> >> > > > >  >Business Manager
> > >> >> > > > >  >Northwood Public School
> > >> >> > > > >  >
> > >> >> > > > >
> > >> >> > > > >
> > >> >> > > > >
> > >> >> > > > >
> > >> >> > > > >
> > >> >> > > > >
> > >> >> > > > >
> > >> >> > > > >
> > >> >> > > > >
> > >> >> > > >
> > >> >> > > >
> > >> >> > > >
> > >> >> > > >
> > >> >> > > >
> > >> >> > > >_______________________________________________________
> > >> >> > > >Say Bye to Slow Internet!
> > >> >> > > >http://www.home.com/xinbox/signup.html
> > >> >> > > >
> > >> >> > >
> > >> >> > >
> > >> >>
> >
> >_________________________________________________________________________
> > >> >> > > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at
> > >> >> http://www.hotmail.com.
> > >> >> > >
> > >> >> > > Share information about yourself, create your own public
> profile
> >at
> > >> >> > > http://profiles.msn.com.
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> >
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
>
> Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
> http://profiles.msn.com.


Can you help me with these?  I need to get them fixed up today.

Thanks,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/20/2001 10:00
AM ---------------------------
From: Gregg Penman on 04/18/2001 01:10 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: RE: Confidentiaility Agreements regarding enovate

I am not sure if any additional items are necessary.  However, the following
jumped to mind, and I am guessing there may be others:
1-Required Disclosure - what if disclosure is required by a legal proceeding?
2-Remedies - what, if any, remedies do we have for disclosure

My other quick thoughts are:
1-I agree that solicitation does not belong
2-Enron should be changed to enovate and we also need to cover affiliates,
i.e. - the rest of Enron and Peoples.

That is all I can think of at the moment.  Let me know your thoughts.

Thanks - Gregg

	Kay Mann
	04/18/2001 06:47 AM

		 To: Gregg Penman/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: Confidentiaility Agreements regarding enovate

Good timing.

You mentioned that there were a couple of things you thought should be added
to the "employee/consultant" form.  Could you email me the topics so that I
can take a look and make changes.  Once again I expect to be on an endless
conference call, but I can work while I talk.

Thanks,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/18/2001 06:45
AM ---------------------------

j.nassos@pecorp.com on 04/17/2001 07:12:57 PM
To: Kay.Mann@enron.com
cc: Gregg.Penman@enron.com, j.pokorny@pecorp.com, b.kowalski@pecorp.com,
f.jacobsen@pecorp.com

Subject: RE: Confidentiaility Agreements regarding enovate

Hi Kay -

You may recall that back in February, we almost finalized two
confidentiality agreements related to enovate L.L.C. activities.  Our
auditors will be sending to enovate shortly a letter indicating they would
like to review various books and records of enovate and ENA as its
activities relate to enovate.  In connection with the review, we need to
finalize those confidentiality agreements.

I have made the change you requested in the attached e-mail to both of the
agreements (PEC and enovate) and have attached below an execution copy of
the agreements for ENA to date and send to PEC and enovate for siganture.
Assuming the attached copies are acceptable, please have ENA sign two
originals of each agreement and send them to me.  I'll arrange for Bill
Morrow to sign the PEC agreement and work with Greg Penmen to have enovate
sign the other agreement.

If you have any questions, please call.  Thanks for your assistance.

John G. Nassos
Asst. General Counsel
Peoples Energy Corporation
130 East Randolph Drive
Chicago, IL 60601
Tel (312) 240-4413
Fax (312) 240-4486
j.nassos@pecorp.com

 <<Conf Ag enovate - ENA (evaluation of enovate) exec.doc>>  <<Conf Ag
Peoples Energy Corp. - ENA (evaluation of enovate) exec.doc>>

> ----------
> From:  Kay.Mann@enron.com[SMTP:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
> Sent:  Thursday, February 08, 2001 3:42 PM
> To:  j.nassos@pecorp.com
> Cc:  Gregg.Penman@enron.com
> Subject:  Re: Confidentiaility Agreements regarding enovate
>
>
> Hi John,
>
> The enovate version looks fine.  I suggest this change to the Peoples
> version:
>
> iv)  is  required to be disclosed to comply with any applicable law,
> order,
>      regulation  or ruling or to enforce enovate's or PMW's rights in
> court
>      or  in  an  arbitration  proceeding  in  connection  with  the
> Limited
>      Liability  Company  Agreement  of  envoate  dated  April  26, 2000,
> as
>      amended,  modified,  and  supplemented  from  time  to  time (the
> "LLC
>      Agreement").  If  PEC  is  requested  or  required  (by oral
> question,
>      interrogatories,  requests  for  information  or  documents,
> subpoena,
>      civil  investigative  demand  or  similar  process)  to  disclose
> any
>      Confidential Information, PEC will promptly notify ENA of such
> request
>      or requirement so that ENA may seek an appropriate protective order
> or
>      waiver  in  compliance  with provisions of this Agreement.  If PEC
> and
>      ENA  are  both  parties  to  the  proceeding,  PEC  will  agree  to
> an
>      appropriate protective order.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Kay
>
>
>
>
>

----------------------------------------------------------------
The information transmitted is intended only for the person
or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential
and/or privileged material.  Any review, retransmission,
dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance
upon, this information by persons or entities other than the
intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error,
please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.

 - Conf Ag enovate - ENA (evaluation of enovate) exec.doc
 - Conf Ag Peoples Energy Corp. - ENA (evaluation of enovate) exec.doc


Sara:

FYI.

Do you think we should begin the process of sending letters asking for back-up from the counterparties who have sent us termination payment notices, but where we believe we are in-the-money?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Panus, Stephanie
Sent:	Wednesday, February 06, 2002 2:31 PM
To:	Aronowitz, Alan
Subject:	Counterparty Calculations

Attached is a list of the counterparties who have provided termination payment calculations.  I have identified whether or not such counterparty provided backup to its calculation, but obviously cannot determine if such backup is sufficient.  For all new notices, backup will be identified when the notice is recorded on the termination log.  I did not look at the ECC or London entities.  For the US entities, we have begun to make files for those counterparties who submitted a calculation, but the files only contain the termination notices at this time.  As I understand, we will be focusing on the non-terminated in-the-money, then the terminated in-the-money.  Therefore, we have not begun pulling the contracts for these counterparties.

 << File: Counterparty Calculations.xls >>

We have been concentrating on the non-terminated in-the-money financial contracts.  For each counterparty, we are pulling 1) the financial agreement, 2) all financial confirmations live as of November 30, 2001, 3) any physical agreements for that counterparty, and 4) any physical confirmations live as of November 30.

Stephanie Panus
Enron Wholesale Services
ph:  713.345.3249
fax:  713.646.3490


Attached is the Legal Risk Memo for the proposal currently with RAC concerning the acquisition of a 10% interest in the Ashton Coal Project plus associated coal marketing rights.

Naturally if you have any questions please don't hesitate to contact me.

David Minns
Senior Legal Counsel
Enron Australia
Phone 612 9229 2310


Yes, I will be there.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Steve - in order to draft the contribution agreement for RMT to transfer
the ETP partnership interests to swapco, we will need to review the
partnership agreements (1) for required consents, etc. and (2) to schedule
the interests in the agreement.  Do you have copies of the appropriate
partnership agreements and, if not, do you know from whom we could get
them?  Thanks.

**********NOTE**********
The information contained in this email message is intended only
for use of the individual or entity named above.  If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or
agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you
have received this communication in error, please immediately
notify us by telephone (214-746-7700), and destroy the original
message. Thank you.


Seems that we could provide Lay/Skilling with the power point slides as prep
for any calls.  As a starter, it would be useful to provide McNeally with a
letter that he could send to federal and state decision makers.

Best,
Jeff

	James D Steffes
	10/06/2000 06:47 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@Enron, mpalmer@enron.com, rshapiro@enron.com,
skean@enron.com
		 Subject: Re: Rebecca Smith

Jeff --

Let's see if we can get material to Lay or Skilling to call McNeally this
week (Oct 9) so that we ask if they'll talk with Rebecca by Oct 15.  What
exactly do we need to give to Lay or Skilling before the call?  What will
Enron send to McNeally if he agrees?  Do we have all of this?

Jim

	Jeff Dasovich
	10/06/2000 09:55 AM

		 To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, mpalmer@enron.com, rshapiro@enron.com,
skean@enron.com
		 Subject: Re: Rebecca Smith

Agree completely.  Notion I had was that we give Rebecca the slides, tell her
the story on background, then she trots off to interview McNeally, Ellison,
etc.  Just a thought.  Might be easier, faster channel that achieves the
quick action/message we're looking for.

	James D Steffes
	10/05/2000 08:30 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@Enron, mpalmer@enron.com, rshapiro@enron.com,
skean@enron.com
		 Subject: Re: Rebecca Smith

I don't disagree with Jeff that the WSJ would be a great message point.  I
would recommend, however, that one of Enron's allies interview for the
story.  For Enron to speak for the hi-tech industry is a bit questionable.
Better if we can approach Intel or Sun now and ask them to talk with R. Smith.

Jim

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	10/05/2000 04:55 PM

		 To: skean@enron.com, rshapiro@enron.com, mpalmer@enron.com, Karen
Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Rebecca Smith

FYI.  Rebecca got back in touch wanting to talk about the history of dereg in
California.  Been trading messages.  When she gets back to me with what she
wants to discuss, I'll check back in before having the conversation.
Question:  What about giving her a copy of our high tech slides with the
intent of getting her to do a story on it?  She might be a good "carrier."
Thoughts?  One story has already hit the SJ Mercury News.

Best,
Jeff


Attached, for your information, a bulletin from Allen & Overy summarizing the
the recent Peregrine judgment (and the judicial treatment of Payments on
Early Termination). Provides for some interesting reading.

Regards, Edmund

 - MK005031.pdf


Which pipe?

pdrexel@columbiaenergygroup.com on 12/29/99 07:36:27 AM
To: Dan Junek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: O&R JAN 2000 NOM

---------------------- Forwarded by Paul Drexelius/CES/ColumbiaGas on 12/29/99
07:42 AM ---------------------------

Heidi Boyd
12/29/99 07:39 AM

To: Karen Bobb/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Noel
Bartlo/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Paul Drexelius/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
cc: Phil Villagomez/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
Subject: O&R JAN 2000 NOM

Hi Karen,

I need   28 dth/day of firm gas flowing to O&R in Jan 2000

Sorry for the late notice.


Following please find the Daily EnronOnline Executive Summary.

EnronOnline Executive Summary for 12/15/2000
Transaction Summary
External Transactions Today	3,153
Average Daily External Transactions (30 day Trailing Avg)	4,310
Total Life to Date Transactions	529,333

EnronOnline Daily % of Entity's Total Transactions for 12/15/00	Trans	Percent
Enron North America	2,379	69%
Enron Europe Limited	182	39%
Global Products	109	27%
Enron Metals	483	25%

EnronOnline Percentage of Total Corporate Transactions
(30 day Trailing Avg)	55%

Gross Notional Value of EnronOnline Transactions	Total
Today	2,190,813,840
MTD	39,901,692,567
LTD	318,754,453,897
Average Daily Notional Value (30 Day Trailing Avg)	3,389,756,362

Notional Revenue from Physical Flows to Date	21,245,199,246

Counterparties, Users, and Products Offered
Counterparties having transacted to date	612
New Counterparties transacting for the first time today	0
Number of Products Offered Today	1,008
Total Number of External Users Logged on Today	3,294
Average # of External Users logged on (30 day Trailing Avg)	3,021

Also attached is the Weekly Public Domain Report, containing information
which is intended for use in presentations or reports which will be seen by
individuals outside Enron.


?
 - reindeer[1].jpg


When: Thursday, November 01, 2001 9:00 AM-2:00 PM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada).
Where: EB3127 for Nov. 1st from  9:00 am - 2:00 pm

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

AGENDA:
9:00A  to 11:00A
Kevin Burns will be here from OATI to provide specifications and describe in more detail the functionality of Web Trader.
11:30 to 2:00 PM
Our goal is to have representatives from the 24-Hour Group and the IT Group bring specific questions for Kevin.
Let's determine if WebTrader can be flexible enough to replace the P&L (Delphi) application, interact with Enpower, and provide a good detailed database for historical information.  Most importantly, is this application fast and efficient enough to add value to the 24-hour group.

Call me with any questions or to discuss.  853-0421

Thanks,

Corry


The roof was planned to go on AFTER the stadium was completed, just as the
case says.  (In fact they actually completed the roof early but the stadium
was late so they were completed together.)

-----Original Message-----
From: Madhur Duggar [mailto:duggar@Haas.Berkeley.EDU]
Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2000 3:04 PM
To: Berk@haas.berkeley.edu
Subject: Fwd: project question

>X-Sender: wsiddiqi@pita.cisco.com
>X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2
>Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2000 19:19:50 -0800
>To: Madhur Duggar <duggar@haas.berkeley.edu>, berk@haas.berkeley.edu
>From: Waseem Siddiqi <wsiddiqi@cisco.com>
>Subject: project question
>
>Just wanted to verify one detail regarding our project.
>
>It says that the estimated completion date is March 1999 with roof by Dec
>1999.
>If the stadium is to be completed by March 1999, shouldn't the roof be in
>by Dec 1998 ?
>This important as if it will either add 1 year to the NPV calculations or
not.
>
>Also reading up on safeco fields history, it did start operating by summer
>1999 so the roof
>must have been up way before that.
>
>thanks
>waseem
>


Team
Here are my Comments:


Stuart has finished his review of the PR invoices, and not the massive pile
is on my desk.

Fred Mitro@ECT
09/29/2000 06:18 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Stuart Zisman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Piper Rudnick Invoices/Peaker meeting

I understand that their are several invoices from Piper Rudnick in Chicago
which are still outstanding.  I will be in Chicago on Monday/Tuesday next
week and back in the Houston office on Wednesday.  If you need any input from
me we can meet on Wednesday or I can be reached by cell phone at 713-412-4612.

Fred.

Stuart:

I will be on a plane to Chicago next Thursday morning until 10:15 am.  I can
call into the Peaker meeting once I am on the ground to discuss any Wilton
Center issues.  Linda Noske gave me a call in number for the conference room
of 713-853-9416.  If the meeting room or schedule changes, let me know before
Thursday.


This is not going to get resolved.  They disagree with our view and are not
going to pay on scheduled volumes.  However, we are not going back off our
view and will continue to bill based on scheduled volumes.


---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron on 03/28/2001
07:11 AM ---------------------------
From: Vicki Sharp@EES on 03/27/2001 06:30 PM
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Various

---------------------- Forwarded by Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES on 03/27/2001 06:29
PM ---------------------------

EES Office of Chairman
03/13/2001 11:57 AM
Sent by: EES Distribution
To: All EES, Enron Europe EES Group, Enron London EES Group
cc:
Subject: Various

Please see attached memo from Dave Delainey.


Thanks for your help on this. I have asked Twanda to set up a meeting to talk
about all the matters you have and the potential insurance coverage for the
Cleveland case.

	Bonnie White/ENRON@enronXgate
	03/30/2001 02:58 PM

		 To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrew Edison/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Linda R Guinn/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: RE: Service of Process - Crown/MCN Arbitration

You will receive this service of process today. I have already spoken with
Sam Gaufin, Crown Energy's counsel, re the subpoena served on us by MCNIC.
ENA holds preferred stock in Crown Energy, but, as I understand from talking
with Dan Lyons, we don't consider it to really have any value.  In any event,
I will make sure that Sam knows what we are producing before it is produced,
and I have made arrangements for a protective order with respect to any Enron
confidential information (although thus far I have seen only a little that
would fall into that category).  Let me know if you have any
questions/comments.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Arnold, Gay
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2001 1:36 PM
To: Sanders, Richard
Cc: Guinn, Linda; White, Bonnie; Studdert, James
Subject: Service of Process - Crown/MCN Arbitration

The following documents, received today, have been forwarded for your
immediate attention:

 Letter from Berman, Gaufin, Tomsic, Savage & Campbell to Enron Capital &
Trade Resources Corp.
 re:  Crown/MCN Arbitration

PLEASE ADVISE IF NOT RECEIVED WITHIN 1 BUSINESS DAY.

Thank you !!

Gay Arnold
Enron Litigation Unit, EB 4829
(713) 853-6612
(713) 853-6576 (fax)
Gay.Arnold@enron.com


Brant:
Their lawyer finally called me.  We have a few open credit issues on our side
that I need for you to think about:

1. Are you okay with the cross default threshold on both sides being 3% of
stockholders' equity?  They didn't like $100,000,000.

2. For corporate policy reasons, they cannot take advantage of affiliate
setoff.  Since I wasn't sure what relationships ENA and its affiliates had
with this counterparty, I wasn't sure how strongly you felt about it.  Please
advise.

Carol


Steve/Maureen:  We came up with our top 10 overall initiatives for the
benefit of the international companies, plus the top 10 by focus country.  I
hope this isn't too much but they are both important and we believe need to
be addressed.


1326 e-mails were sent out with the attached notice               whew!!!!!!
under a new e-mail account I set up on my account...ets1@ev1.net

I bet ev1 is happy with me!!!!!   HA! Got my $10.00 worth this month!!!!!

Toby

-----Original Message-----
From: ets1 [mailto:ets1@mail.ev1.net]
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 3:37 PM
To: RROLLINS@FLGAS.COM; rsnyd@city.lakeland.net; RSOMMERF@UTILICORP.COM;
RSOUTHERLAND@ZEMEX.COM; RTABER@RICHLANDRESOURCES.COM;
RTANGEMAN@KGAS.COM; rtibbs@oneok.com; RTISDALE@OXY.COM;
rwebb@teainc.org; rwilliams@enogex.com; rwshuck@farmland.com;
RWW@KCSENERGY
Subject: ETS Customer Notice

Please see attached notice

________________________________________________________________
Sent via the EV1 webmail system at mail.ev1.net


This is all I have received.   I asked for a confirmation, but have not
received one yet.  I got Lysa's phone mail, so I don't know if she is there
or not.

---------------------- Forwarded by Rebecca W Cantrell/HOU/ECT on 12/12/2000
06:52 PM ---------------------------

Lysa Akin
12/11/2000 05:43 PM
To: Leslie Lawner/HOU/EES@EES, Rebecca W Cantrell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron, Roy Boston/HOU/EES@EES, Steve Montovano/DUB/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Conference Call re: Gas Curtailment and Diversion Paper

Please advise ASAP your availability for a call regarding the above
referenced topic on Wednesday, December 13th at
7:00 am Pacific / 9:00am Central / 10:00am Eastern

Lysa Akin
Enron Corp.
Sr. Admin. Ass't. - Gov't Affairs
121 SW Salmon, 3WTC0306
Portland, OR  97204
Office (503) 464-7927
Fax (503) 464-3740
lysa.akin@enron.com


Mark,

I attach Cadwalader's memorandum in its final version.  This is the product
of a number of discussions/comments between myself and David Mitchell.  It
has been written on the basis that trading is carried on outside the US;
obviously, a different memorandum would be required in relation of trading
carried on by ECT from Houston.

Look forward to seeing you on Wednesday, and of course at the Conference!

Justin

---------------------- Forwarded by Justin Boyd/LON/ECT on 30/04/99 13:32
---------------------------

Justin Boyd
29/04/99 17:03
To: JMETZ@cwt.com
cc:
Subject: Re: Memo Internet Trading

Thanks!

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  JMETZ@cwt.com                           29/04/99 16:34

To: Jboyd@enron.co.uk
cc: aalexand@cwt.com (bcc: Justin Boyd/LON/ECT)
Subject: Memo Internet Trading

THIS E-MAIL IS FROM DAVID MITCHELL.

Per your conversation:

(See attached file: Enron Europe Limited.01)

|------------------------------------------------------------------|
|NOTE:  The information in this email is confidential and may be   |
|legally privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, you   |
|must not read, use or disseminate the information.  Although this |
|email and any attachments are believed to be free of any virus or |
|other defect that might affect any computer system into which it  |
|is received and opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient |
|to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted |
|by Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft for any loss or damage arising in|
|any way from its use.                                             |
|------------------------------------------------------------------|

 - Enron Europe Limited.01


Kevin -

Just want to double check that Harry has declined the contract and offer letter from UBS.

I have a letter that David handed over which states he was declining the contract, but wanted to remain an employee at will.

Sorry for double checking, but just wanted to close the loop.

Thanks!
Amy


i asked ina rangel to send it to you.


Washington Times
October 13, 1999 (Circulation: 106,852)

HEADLINE: "Wine of the Week"
AUTHOR: Paul Lukacs
SUMMARY:
Recommended:
* 1997 Robert Mondavi Coastal Cabernet Sauvignon North Coast-This full-bodied
wine is an excellent value.  It outperforms many $20 cabernets by offering a
delicious combination of brawn and finesse.  Rich black-fruit flavors combine
with firm but not oppressive tannins to produce a wine that feels silky but
tastes rich and powerful.  Drink this cabernet with full-flavored meat
dishes-steaks and chops, roast beef or rack of lamb. ($12)

Opus vertical tasting ratings:
* 1979 Opus One-(91)
* 1980 Opus One-(90)
* 1981 Opus One-(87)
* 1982 Opus One-(94)
* 1983 Opus One-(88)
* 1984 Opus One-(85)
* 1985 Opus One-(87)
* 1986 Opus One-(87)
* 1987 Opus One-(88)
* 1988 Opus One-(88)
* 1989 Opus One-(90)
* 1990 Opus One-(90)
* 1991 Opus One-(92)
* 1992 Opus One-(93)
* 1993 Opus One-(92)
* 1994 Opus One-(94)
* 1995 Opus One-(95)
* 1996 Opus One-(93) Has very fine cassis, clove, currant, smoke and cedar
aromas.  Softer then the '95, with great harmony and finesse.  Not for the
long term, but drinks beautifully now.
* 1997 Opus One-(95) Bottled last spring, it will be released in the fall of
2000.  Shows lots of toasty oak, with grapey, earthy notes.  Despite its
youth it's already supple and harmonious.  Really wonderful mouthfeel, with
sweet tannins.  Great fruit, opulent, very rich, very great quality.
1998 Opus One-(95) Still in barrel.  Almost black in color.  Smells very
young and jammy.  Has gobs of youthful berry fruit.  Just a scamp now, but
already rich, complex and opulent.  Should be very fine some day

Nancy - #4870


I have Louise locked in for June 15th in the am.  Now I need your help in
securing Rick Causey and Joe Sutton or Jeff Skilling.

Here is some information you will need when 'wooing' them.

The first annual Global Conference will be held at the Rice Hotel in downtown
Houston on June 15th and June 16th.  The theme of the conference is
'Foundations of "One Enron".'  A review of Global Data
Management's(Counterparty, Contracts, Facilities, Rates, Entelligence) role
in the development and support of central information regarding Enron's
customers and relationships and plans for expanding that role will be
discussed.  Many topics will re-inforce worldwide initiatives, communication
between business units, and learning to leverage knowledge and expertise from
multiple sources. There will also be a special workshop session on
multi-cultural awareness to prepare our teams for working in a global
environment.

And then you say.....
"Mary and I would like to feature you as a distinguished speaker, so you may
relate to Mary's team and conference attendees why consistent global
information is so important to Enron.  What value does constancy of
information bring to Enron....how will this information serve Enron ?  We
would like you to inspire us and influence us to meet Enron's diverse set of
challenges.    Take the freedom to express things you have learned and think
are valuable lessons to share with others.
We have guest speaker spots available on the following days and times

June 15  - 1:30 - 1:50                or 2:10 - 2:30
or 2:30 - 2:50

June 16 - 11:00 - 11:20 (before lunch)                       or 12:30 - 12:50
(after lunch)

I would like to have you be the final keynote speaker on Friday, 6/16 from
3:15 to 3:45 or so (time for questions).  After that there will be some door
prizes, the video presentation, and a brief conference summary.  Then it's
off to Enron Field !  We would be delighted to have you attend all of the
conference, but if your schedule will not permit, we would love if you could
remain with us throughout Friday afternoon and accompany us to Enron Field
for a social event in the Diamond Club.

I appreciate your efforts to secure meaningful and well-respected speakers
for this year's conference.  If you need assistance from me, just let me know.


?
----- Original Message -----
From: savont
To: kenlay@enron.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2000 10:31 AM
Subject: Chron ed board

Rosie,
?
They don't want to do the ed board meeting without  Ken...but don't tell Don.
How about going back to the 10th October in the  afternoon. I have to get
with Jordan and Campo.
?
--Dave


I am finalizing the documentation for Jeff's signature now.  The resolution (Jeff does not sign) will have to follow.

Please provide me with the contact information so that I can forward the documents to CSFB (phone, fax and courier delivery address).

Marie

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Doukas, Tom
Sent:	Thursday, October 18, 2001 9:04 AM
To:	Shackleton, Sara; Heard, Marie; Panus, Stephanie
Cc:	Kinneman, Jeff; Pizzolato, Paul; Wall, David
Subject:	CSFB agreement
Importance:	High

Sara,

Jeff Kinneman has suggested that perhaps legal could scan the executed document and edit the signature pages as opposed to recreate it since CSFB cannot provide the word document we requested.

However we decide to pursue this is still a priority as we are now shut off from trading.

Please advise as to what time frame we can expect the document to be completed.

Thanks,

Tom


Sales to PGE:

10/3	After you put in the lending for this day, I agree we are still out by 150 mw.  Its down to two schedules; can you check to see what you show for the Montana buy/resale.  This should be 32 peak everyday.  The other for the day is our pge system to grizzly this should be 26 mw peak.  You have the correct number of MW's coming to us but not going to you.

10/5 & 10/6   You show 200 more llh....I don't know why????

10/8	The 200 mw you show llh should be a total of 256 (32 llh due to colstrip).  Call me to go thru the hourly at your system to find our 2 mw descrepancy.  You have the correct number of MW's coming to us but not going to you.

10/9  You show 8 mw @ 24.20 under To BPA-EPMI RP-LS-MC account.  Don't know what that is?  You also only show it on one side??

I'll send more when i get thru it!!

diana

-----Original Message-----
From: Anne Snyder [mailto:Anne_Snyder@pgn.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 4:05 PM
To: Scholtes, Diana
Subject: October detail


Yes I did get an apartment.  They are still doing some renovations, so I'll
probably be in a hotel for a few days.  The owner said he would try to have
it by the 12th, but you know how that goes.  I should be able to move in no
later than the 16th though so that's not too bad.  If you could recommend a
hotel I'd appreciate it.

Thanks,
Robin

From: Lynn Pikofsky@ENRON on 03/07/2001 08:49 AM
To: Robin Rodrigue/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Parking

The garage we park in is full, I am waiting to hear back from 2 others.  I
will let you know as soon as I find out.  Did you find an apartment?

Lynn


-----Original Message-----
From: Palmer, Mark A. (PR)
Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2001 11:14 PM
To: Kean, Steven J.; Denne, Karen
Subject: FW: first draft of release attached

this is apparently falling apart as I type this.  For your reading pleasure, I send the attached.
-----Original Message-----
From: steve lipin [mailto:stevelipin@hotmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2001 10:46 PM
To: deborah.fiorito@dynegy.com; Palmer, Mark A. (PR)
Subject: first draft of release attached

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp


Hi Carlos,

Here's the PSA I mentioned.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 02/26/2001 04:11
PM ---------------------------

Scott Churbock
02/20/2001 09:20 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rusty Stevens/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: MSA

Here is Trinity's MSA for your review.  Thank you for looking this over.  Let
me know how you would like to proceed.

Scott

---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Churbock/NA/Enron on 02/20/2001
09:16 AM ---------------------------

Steve_Ramsey@trinityconsultants.com on 02/16/2001 02:31:55 PM
To: scott.churbock@enron.com
cc:

Subject: MSA

Scott, attached is a template that we have for master service agreements.
Take and look and see what you think.

Steve

(See attached file: MSA Template.doc)

 - MSA Template.doc


And so it goes on .........
---------------------- Forwarded by Jon Chapman/LON/ECT on 14/11/2000 09:44
---------------------------

David_Davies@chubb.com.au on 14/11/2000 05:21:06
To: tim@boomad.com.au, Jon.Chapman@enron.com, mmdalyell@statestreet.com
cc:

Subject: FW: Good luck America

David Davies
National Manager - Chubb Traffic Services
02 9930 4318 / 0401 77 66 18

---------------------- Forwarded by David Davies/NSW/Chubb on 14/11/2000
03:22 PM ---------------------------

Tony Ayers <tony@secureparking.com.au> on 14/11/2000 04:15:44 PM

To:   "David Davies (E-mail)" <David_Davies@chubb.com.au>, "Mark Langan
      (E-mail)" <mlangan@candlerecruit.com>, "Patrick O'Callaghan (E-mail)"
      <patricko@cityford.com.au>, "Tony Ayers (E-mail)"
      <aayers@ozemail.com.au>
cc:

Subject:  FW: Good luck America

-----Original Message-----
From:     paul.g.smith@customs.gov.au <mailto:paul.g.smith@customs.gov.au>
[SMTP:paul.g.smith@customs.gov.au]
<mailto:[SMTP:paul.g.smith@customs.gov.au]>
Sent:     Tuesday, 14 November 2000 15:13
To:  sculleys@flex.com.au; <mailto:sculleys@flex.com.au;>
tony@secureparking.com.au; <mailto:tony@secureparking.com.au;>
wise@goldn.com.au; <mailto:wise@goldn.com.au;>  anderson@fan.net.au
<mailto:anderson@fan.net.au>
Subject:  FW: Good luck America

These are some quotes attributed to the would be American President
George
Bush
Perhaps this is how upper management speak?
Subject:  Good luck America....

"The vast majority of our imports come from outside the country."
....George W. Bush, Jr.
"If we don't succeed, we run the risk of failure."
....George W. Bush, Jr.

"Republicans understand the importance of bondage between a mother and
child."
....Governor George W. Bush, Jr.
"Welcome to Mrs. Bush, and my fellow astronauts."
....Governor George W. Bush, Jr.

"Mars is essentially in the same orbit...Mars is somewhat the same
distance from the Sun, which is very important.
We have seen pictures where there are canals, we believe, and water. If
there is water, that means there is oxygen.
If oxygen, that means we can breathe."
....Governor George W. Bush, Jr., 8/11/94
"The Holocaust was an obscene period in our nation's history. I mean in
this century's history.  But we all lived in this century. I didn't live
in this century."
....Governor George W. Bush, Jr., 9/15/95
"I believe we are on an irreversible trend toward more freedom and
democracy - but that could change."
....Governor George W. Bush, Jr., 5/22/98
"One word sums up probably the responsibility of any Governor, and that
one word is 'to be prepared'."
....Governor George W. Bush, Jr., 12/6/93
"Verbosity leads to unclear, inarticulate things."
....Governor George W. Bush, Jr., 11/30/96

"I have made good judgments in the past. I have made good judgments in
the future."
....Governor George W. Bush, Jr.
"The future will be better tomorrow."
....Governor George W. Bush, Jr.

"We're going to have the best educated American people in the world."
....Governor George W. Bush, Jr., 9/21/97
"People that are really very weird can get into sensitive positions and
have a tremendous impact on history."
....Governor George W. Bush.
"I stand by all the misstatements that I've made."
....Governor George W. Bush, Jr. to Sam Donaldson, 8/17/93
"We have a firm commitment to NATO, we are a part of NATO. We have a
firm commitment to Europe. We are a part of Europe." ....Governor George
W. Bush, Jr.
"Public speaking is very easy."
....Governor George W. Bush, Jr. to reporters in 10/9
"I am not part of the problem. I am a Republican"
....Governor George W. Bush, Jr.

"A low voter turnout is an indication of fewer people going to the
polls."
....Governor George W. Bush, Jr
"When I have been asked who caused the riots and the killing in LA, my
answer has been direct & simple Who is to blame for the riots? The
rioters are to blame. Who is to blame for the killings? The killers are
to blame."
....George W. Bush, Jr.
"Illegitimacy is something we should talk about in terms of not having
it."
....Governor George W. Bush, Jr., 5/20/96
"We are ready for any unforeseen event that may or may not occur."
....Governor George W. Bush, Jr., 9/22/97
"For NASA, space is still a high priority."
....Governor George W. Bush, Jr., 9/5/93

"Quite frankly, teachers are the only profession that teach our
children."
....Governor George W. Bush, Jr., 9/18/95
"The American people would not want to know of any misquotes that
George Bush may or may not make."
....Governor George W. Bush, Jr.
"We're all capable of mistakes, but I do not care to enlighten you on
the mistakes we may or may not have made."
....Governor George W. Bush, Jr.
"It isn't pollution that's harming the environment. It's the impurities
in our air and water that are doing it."
....Governor George W. Bush, Jr.
"[It's] time for the human race to enter the solar system."
....Governor George W. Bush, Jr.

*************************************************************
This email and any files attached are considered
confidential and intended solely for the use of the
individual or entity to whom this email is addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify :
         ( itsupport@chubb.com.au )
This footnote also confirms that the above email has been
scanned for the presence of computer viruses.
*************************************************************


Start Date: 1/28/02; HourAhead hour: 2;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002012802.txt
###Cannot locate a Preferred or Revised_Preferred Schedule that matches the FINAL Individual Interchange Schedule.  Unable to assign deal number.


Hey Lyndon,

It was nice to hear from you.  We are in dired need of the upcoming vacation!  Things here have been changing by the day.  To make a long story short, my country is at war and going into a recession, the company that Kim 1, Stacy and I work for was purchased on Friday by another company after finding out that our Chief Financial Officer was involved on some questionable activities - (to the tune of about $3.5 billion) practically taking our company down single handedly, loosing about 90% of the value of our stock,  therefore, we are broke, AND my boyfriend and I broke up.    Things just aren't right.  But hopefully, things will start to get better.  I'm very glad I have a trip (that is paid for!) to look forward to!

How was your gay cruise?  I think I would have a hard time with that one myself!  I do hope all is well with you.  We will all be ready to play and relax in January!  Take care -

Kim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lyndon Clark <orcasouth@yahoo.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, October 30, 2001 11:38 AM
To:	Ward, Kim S (Houston)
Subject:	Re: Hey!

Life has been very busy back here on the poly. We have
just come out of wetdock and the ship is a mess but
will be awesome by the time you get here. Our first
cruise this week is a gay cruise, very strange!!!!!
Its not really my type of cruise. Seeing 2 guys
cuddling each other sleeping on the deck is a bit much
for me. I dont dislike it, its just I dont understand
it. Women are such beautiful creatures, why !!!
Anyway yes I will more than likely be here when you
get here, unless I get sacked or quit, but more than
likely I will be here.

Take Care
See you soon
Love Lyndon

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals.
http://personals.yahoo.com


Hey girl,

How's it going?  Haven't had a chance to talk with you over the last two
days.  I went to get me hair done on Wednesday night and did not get home
until 11:00 p.m.  By the time I got the kids to bed, it was almost midnight
and I was sick about keeping them up that late.  Last night, I went to the
grocery store, came home and cooked my boys a good meal of ham, macaroni and
cheese and green beans.  After we relaxed for a while, we started getting
ready for their baths and we all went to bed around 8:30 p.m.  I was
exhausted from being out late Tuesday and Wednesday night.  I woke up around
1:00 a.m. and watched TV for a few minutes and went back to bed.   I was
tired.

This evening I made a nail appointment.  My nails look like "do-do".  I would
like to get a new set tonight, but we'll see if we get off early enough for
that.

Daddy sent me a e-mail today, he had two really bad days on Wednesday and
Friday, but he's scheduled to go in for more tests today.

Talk with you later!


Mark,
Just wanted to give you a heads up that Steve Barry would be calling you
sometime this afternoon, apparently he was tied up this morning.
thanks

Mark.Greenberg@enron.com wrote:

> Brenda -
>
> John Allario forwarded the Sabre comments to the NDA.  I have reviewed the
> latest document and find changes to paragraphs 2, 7 and 12 only.  If this
> is accurate, then my comments are as follows:
>
> 1.  Paragraph 2 - deletion of residual knowledge - this deletion is
> unacceptable.
>
> 2.  Paragraph 7 - deletion of residual knowledge - this deletion is
> unacceptable.
>
> 3.  Paragraph 12 - deletion of arbitration - this deletion is acceptable.
>
> As to the residual knowledge concept, this is clearly a concept that Sabre
> contemplated would be outside of the boundaries of confidentiality.  The
> mere fact that the disclosing party's information is contained within
> someone's mind should not enable it to be used to the disadvantage of the
> disclosing party, nor remove it from remaining confidential.  The changes
> made by Enron on 3-20-01 should be reimplemented.  If this presents a
> problem, please have your legal personnel contact me to further explain
> Sabre's position.
>
> Mark
> Senior Counsel, ENA
> Phone:     713-345-8897
> Facsimile: 713-646-3940
> E-Mail:      Mark.Greenberg@enron.com


I got your message, and I'll take care of it.  Thanks for your help.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Webb, Elizabeth
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 2:43 PM
To:	Williams, Jason (Trading)
Cc:	Superty, Robert; Heinrich, Brian
Subject:	FW: HR Headcount Report

Jason,

Effective November 1, 2001 your salary should be transferred to Hunter Shively's cost center: 107317.   I need you to enter this new cost center into your timesheet.  The way that you do this is to enter the new cost center number into the space that says Rec. CCtr for November 1 - 15th.  Also, you will need to manually enter 8 hours worked for each day so that SAP will pick up your time and expenses and put them in the new cost center.  You will also need to do the same thing for November 16 - 30th.

Please write me back and let me know that you have received this message.  Also, please call me with any additional questions.

Thanks for your time and assistance in this matter.

Elizabeth Webb
x51694

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Heinrich, Brian
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 2:17 PM
To:	Webb, Elizabeth
Cc:	Superty, Robert; Snow, Karen
Subject:	RE: HR Headcount Report

Elizabeth,
The best way to get Jason's salary transferred to the correct cost center (since it is only one pay period back), is to have him go into his SAP timesheet and have him code his time to the new cost center.  This way the system (SAP) will correct all his payroll costs automatically.
If you need help explaining to him how to do this, let me know.
Thanks,
Brian

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Webb, Elizabeth
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 2:13 PM
To:	Heinrich, Brian
Cc:	Superty, Robert; Snow, Karen
Subject:	FW: HR Headcount Report

Brian,

Please note that Jason Williams should be transferred out of CC: 103872 effective November 1, 2001 and put in Hunter Shively's Co: 0413/CC: 107317.

Thanks,
Elizabeth

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Choate, Heather
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 1:19 PM
To:	Webb, Elizabeth
Subject:	HR Headcount Report

Elizabeth,

Yes, per the email below, I am asking Karen to to transfer Jason Williams out of this Cost Center and into Hunter Shively's Co: 0413/CC: 107317.
I have not heard back from her since this email, but plan on calling her at 3pm if I have still not heard any comment on my request.

: ) Heather

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Choate, Heather
Sent:	Wednesday, November 21, 2001 1:42 PM
To:	Campos, Karen E.
Cc:	Heinrich, Brian; Webb, Elizabeth; De Jesus, Frank; Hennessy, Sonia; Saldana, Alex; Romero, Araceli; Jackson, Brandee; Dade, Dorothy; Pena, Yolanda
Subject:	HR Headcount Report

Karen,

Forgot the attachment!  (see below)
 ______________________________________________________________________________
I have reviewed the HR Report you sent me and am attaching the following corrections.
I was however missing the following Company and Cost Centers and need to receive
these reports as well.  If you could send these ASAP for review, I would greatly
appreciate it.

Missing Cost Centers:

083E/103872 - Bob Superty (Owner) - Project Aruba  (Jason Williams should be transferred out to 0413, 107317, effective Nov. 1, 2001)

0011/102757 - Martha Stevens (Owner) - South America Risk

0444/106294 - Peggy Hedstrom (Owner) - Calgary Operations

0444/150158 - Peggy Hedstrom (Owner) - Canada IT Development

0444/150195 - Peggy Hedstrom (Owner) - Canada IT Development Support

Bob Hall wants me to make sure our headcount is true and accurate.

If you would then please advise when you could send me a 'clean' report with all of our
corrections made, I would appreciate it.

  << File: Report11.14.01.xls >>
Thank you!
Heather Choate, x33278


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Chen, Hai
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:48 PM
To:	Black, Tamara Jae
Subject:	options market update
Importance:	High

T. J.,

Please forward attached Option Market Update to all traders and mid marketers in Monday morning.  Thanks!


Suzie's working on your ICTS, it ain't working so far.


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 12/22/2000
08:30 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Darron C Giron                           12/21/2000 06:16 PM

To: jhsim@juno.com
cc:
Subject: Re: P&L

Your UA4 is 12,000 MMBtu and $103,800.  The P&L is attached.  The total daily
is $471,793 before any sharing.

DG

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  James Simpson                           12/21/2000 04:32 PM

To: Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: P&L

Darron,

Could you tell me what my unaccounted balance is as well.  I am working with
Cora P to make it zero.  Also could you email the P&L number to
jhsim@juno.com.

Thanks Darron,
I'm just alittle nervous.  I am flying solo and it was a big number.  Almost
too good to be true.


As we are having software problems, I am sending a clean version of the Enron
draft of the agreement. Please e-mail me a compare write showing any changes
to this clean version.

Thanks,

Ben

-----Original Message-----
From: Jacoby, Ben
Sent: Mon 6/4/2001 11:20 AM
To: Krimsky, Steven; Mann, Kay; orshefskyd@gtlaw.com; medleyb@gtlaw.com
Cc:
Subject: latest draft of Deerfield Agreement

Kay:

I incorporated the change to the opening para. from your e-mail to accounting
on 5-31.


It is my sincere honor to once again lead the Enron team in this year's Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation (JDRF) Walk scheduled to take place on Sunday, October 28th, at Greenspoint Mall.  I continue to serve on the board of JDRF representing Enron and will be Enron's corporate executive for this year's fundraising efforts.

As many of you may already know, I am an insulin dependent diabetic myself.  Even though I know how difficult this disease can be to manage with the multiple finger pricks for blood samples and several shots each day, I cannot imagine how difficult it is for a small child with this disease.  Taking insulin does not cure the disease nor prevent the development of complications; insulin is simply their life support system and without it they would die.

Enron continues to be a major corporate sponsor for JDRF again this year.  JDRF is a very efficient organization in which approximately 85% of all money raised goes directly to research.  Enron's goal this year is to raise $400,000 and we need your help.  Enron has been the number 1 walk team for 6 years in a row and we are not ready to give up first place!  We need team leaders, walkers and volunteers to help us reach our goal.  The theme for the walk this year is "Mission: Possible" and we would like to have you join us for this great event.  The Walk is truly a blast and we had about 600 Enron people participate last year and everyone enjoyed it.

If you are interested in volunteering to be a walker or a team leader, or if you would like to make a pledge, you may call any of the steering committee members listed below.  If you are interested in being a team leader, please contact one of the following people immediately so that you may be included in the first important and informative training session taking place this week.  In addition, you may go to cr.enron.com and sign up as a volunteer online if you prefer.

Thank you very much for your support.

Mike McConnell

Steering Committee Members:
Cathy Phillips	X36898
Angela Sprock	X36335
Jennifer Milligan	X35272
Janice Riedel	X37507
Debbie Yates	X35305
Kendra Dromgoole	X58981


Steve, you have been given all the written permit history and portable
analyzer correspondance from myself to and from the State of New  Mexico.
All of my air permit files were copied and sent to you previously.  If there
is confusion, I apologize but everything that has been agreed to by the State
of New Mexico has been made available for review and use.

If I need to sit down with you and or others to go over this, let me know.

Steve SanMiguel
03/13/2000 08:12 PM

To: Larry Campbell/ET&S/Enron
cc: Rich Jolly/ET&S/Enron@Enron, William Kendrick/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Gary
Maestas/ET&S/Enron, Gary Maestas/OTS/Enron, Arnie Bailey/ET&S/Enron@Enron,
Rick Smith/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Matt Francis/ET&S/Enron@Enron, David Carbajal,
Ralph Mireles/ET&S/Enron, George E Gardner/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Marc
Phillips/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Rick Cates/ET&S/Enron, Team
Mountainair/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Team Roswell/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Team
Artesia/ET&S/Enron, Team Carlsbad, Jonny Hendricks/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Ronnie
Morse/ET&S/Enron, Brent Leisher/ET&S/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: Request

Larry

    This will work just fine, just after the call is made to me concerning a
NM Audit, please send me a lotus note concerning this request.
Their have been to misunderstandings and confusion concerning portable
testing in New Mexico and I need this for my protection.

Again if their are any questions or concerns pertaining to this request, I
encourage anyone to call.

Office:  1/505/625/8039
Cell:      1/505/626/6208
Page:   1/800/223/9498
Home:  1/505/623/2799 Adults
Kids:     1/505/623/4230

Thank you

Steve San Miguel

Larry Campbell
03/13/2000 10:29 AM
To: Steve SanMiguel/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Butch Russell/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc: Rich Jolly/ET&S/Enron@Enron, William Kendrick/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Gary
Maestas/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Team Roswell/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Team
Artesia/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Team Carlsbad/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Team
Mountainair/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Arnie Bailey/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Rick
Smith/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Matt Francis/ET&S/Enron@Enron, David
Carbajal/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Ronnie Morse/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Eddie
Thomas/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Stoney Buchanan/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Ralph
Mireles/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Jonny Hendricks/ET&S/Enron@Enron, George E
Gardner/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Brent Leisher/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Marc
Phillips/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Rick Cates/ET&S/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: Request

Steve due to New Mexico's new focus on conducting surprise inspections, there
may not  be the opportunity of advanced notice.  In  the effort to keep
everyone in the loop,  notification will be made to those individuals when I
receive a call from the state.

Steve SanMiguel
03/09/2000 08:42 PM

To: Larry Campbell/ET&S/Enron, Butch Russell/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc: Rich Jolly/ET&S/Enron@Enron, William Kendrick/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Gary
Maestas/OTS/Enron, Team Roswell/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Team Artesia/ET&S/Enron,
Team Carlsbad, Team Mountainair/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Arnie
Bailey/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Rick Smith/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Matt
Francis/ET&S/Enron@Enron, David Carbajal, Ronnie Morse/ET&S/Enron, Eddie
Thomas, Stoney Buchanan/ET&S/Enron, Ralph Mireles/ET&S/Enron, Jonny
Hendricks/ET&S/Enron@Enron, George E Gardner/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Brent
Leisher/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Marc Phillips/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Rick
Cates/ET&S/Enron

Subject: Request

Larry and Butch

         In the future if their is a request for portable testing in State of
New Mexico, or if the AQB is performing an audit at any facility, I will
support and go where ever necessary day or night.

       I would only ask that after the call that this is put in Lotus notes
for my personal records.

I'm sure you can understand.

If anyone has any questions or concerns please feel free to call.

Office:  1/505/625/8039
Cell:     1/505/626/6208
Page:     1/800/223/9498
Home: 1/505/623/4239

I do appreciate your support.

Thanks

Steve San Miguel


Woody,

I think I've received email from Joanna Beckerman but I can't find an email
address for her.  Would you send her address to me please?

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Coord1 [mailto:oper1@velco.com]
> Sent:	Friday, August 10, 2001 3:43 PM
> To:	'bamelan@cvps.com'; 'pecor@gmpvt.com'; 'oakes@gmpvt.com';
> 'bbentley@cvps.com'; Trudy Billings; '72233.1676@compuserve.com';
> 'kperry@czn.com'; Frank Ettori; Gary Parker; 'Anabeth Rivest (E-mail)';
> 'bill.gleason@omya.com'; 'CVPS Daily Desk (E-mail)'; 'Linda Nelson
> (E-mail)'; 'VPPSA Watchdog'; Coord1; 'psbrooks@vppsa.com'; Laurie McMahon;
> Greg Draper; 'brown@gmavt.net'; Coord2
> Subject:	VY reduction
>
> August 9, 2001
>
> TO:		Vermont Yankee Stakeholders
>
> FROM:	Bobbi Kilburn - Treasury and Risk Administrator
>
> SUBJECT:  	Vermont Yankee Notification
>
>
> Due to lots of inquires and a scheduled rod pattern adjustment I'm issuing
> this Vermont Yankee Update.
>
> Vermont Yankee is currently operating at 100% power, which is
> approximately 500 megawatts. Due to the high temperatures and low river
> levels the plant has redeclared it's output for the foreseeable future at
> approximately 500 megawatts.
>
> The plant will reduce power by 150 megawatts on Thursday, August 16, 2001
> to perform a rod pattern adjustment.  This down power will be initiated at
> 2100 (9:00 PM) with the entire evolution taking approximately 9-10 hours.
> The plant will reach it's full capability at approximately 0530 (5:30
> a.m.) on Friday, August 17, 2001.
>
>
>
>
>
>


Mr. Lay,
Enron has been very good to our contract company.  We have very little expectation of being paid but we love this company as much as you do.  We work in your corporate records with a great group of people and I feel we are needed there at this time.  We have so much faith in you and we know you will pull Enron through this tumultuous time.  This is meant to be a note of encouragement for a man we all admire very much.  You've done it before.  You can do it again.


---------------------- Forwarded by Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron on 04/27/2001
04:19 PM ---------------------------

"BLOOMBERG POWERMATCH " <POWERMATCH@bloomberg.net> on 04/27/2001 02:34:04 PM
To:
cc:

Subject: BUY  50 OMC01MAY at 230.0000 - AQUILA ENERGY

BUY  50 OMC01MAY at 230.0000 - AQUILA ENERGY
Trade   2 RefID 20010427070002 on 04/27/2001
Buyer  : ENRON POWER MARKETING INC. (WEST)               (AGGR)
SEAN CRANDALL                            Phone 503 464 3815
Seller : AQUILA ENERGY
RODNEY DRAKE                             Phone 816-527-1760
Delivery: Physical power, Unrestricted Mid-C
Type : Financ. firm, w/liquidated damages, WSPP schedule C-2
Days : 31 (Mon-Sat, incl. all Sun & NERC holidays, 6x8 & 1x24)
Dates: 5/01/2001 through 5/31/2001
Hours: HE 0100 - 0600 and 2300 - 2400,  Pacific Prevailing Time
Rate   50 MW/Hour at USD   230.00/MWh, Total   16400 MWh
Commission Fee : USD   82.00 ( 0.00500/MWh)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Buyer and Seller acknowledge that all aspects and terms of this transaction
were determined and agreed to solely by the
Buyer and the Seller and compliance with the terms of this transaction is
strictly their obligation. If any dispute
occurs, or if Buyer and Seller fail to reach agreement on all of the terms of
this transaction, Buyer and Seller agree
to hold Bloomberg Powermatch LLC, Bloomberg L.P. and each of their affiliates
and successors harmless from any and all
liabilities that may result therefrom.


Dear Friends and Colleagues,

It's been a great run at Enron and Houston, but after three wonderful years, it's time to say goodbye.  As most of you know, I'm headed off to Harvard Business School this fall.  I have truly enjoyed getting to know each of you, and I'll miss you next year.  I want to wish you the best of luck and future success.  I'm leaving Houston next Friday, but I would like one last chance to say goodbye.

Please join me this Thursday, May 31 at Teala's (3210 West Dallas) from 6-10pm for a Farewell Happy Hour.  I hope to see you there!

Brian

_____________________
Brian T. Hoskins
Enron Broadband Services
713-853-0380 (office)
713-412-3667 (mobile)
713-646-5745 (fax)
Brian_Hoskins@enron.net


Brett, this looks fine.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 12/18/2000
05:10 PM ---------------------------

Brett R Wiggs@ENRON
12/18/2000 04:50 PM
To: David W Delainey@ECT
cc:
Subject: Additional Language

Dave:

The following is the additional language I discussed.  Please let me know if
this is acceptable.

Thanks,
Brett

Section 24.14 Purchase Option.  Within ninety (90) Days following the
Execution Date, each of PETROBRAS and SFE agree to discuss the potential
option of PETROBRAS or one of its Affiliates to purchase all of the
outstanding equity interests in SFE following the Term of this Agreement.
Each of PETROBRAS and SFE agree that unless definitive documentation is
executed regarding such potential sale, no such discussions shall be binding
on either PETROBRAS or SFE. Each of PETROBRAS and SFE shall have no
obligation to enter into any transaction regarding such proposed sale.
Nothing in this Section 24.14 shall be deemed as a condition to the
performance of any Party under this Agreement and the failure to effect such
sale shall in no way relieve any Party of any obligation set forth herein.


Rod Hayslett
EB4054
713-853-6178


Thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Jamie Wimberly" <Benjamin.Wimberly@Verizon.net>@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 1:32 PM
To:	Steffes, James D.
Cc:	'Ken Malloy'
Subject:	Note From Jamie Wimberly

Jim:

I just wanted to write you a note of support in what I am sure are some
very trying times.  Ken and I remain fans of yours and fully appreciate
everything you have done for CAEM.  Let us know if we can be of any
assistance to you.

Jamie

Jamie Wimberly
President
CAEM


What's the final answer.... do you need the enduser gas or do you want me to
cut the enduser gas? P

 If you really need the enduser gas... the only other option is for me... is
to beg TCO to let me inject some pool gas into storage for that gas day to
avoid the $10 withdrawal penalty... but we would still incur the overrun
charge plus the additional overrun charge to get the gas into storage. Need a
decision by 1 pm CST time on Monday, January 31st. Thank you!!!!

Please pass this note to Melissa... still don't have her e-mail address.

Can't wait for it to warm up!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

	From:  Joan Veselack                           01/27/2000 07:38 PM

To: hboyd@columbiaenergygroup.com, kdestep@columbiaenergygroup.com
cc: mstiles@columbiaenergygroup.com, knovsek@columbiaenergygroup.com, Chris
Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dick Jenkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Hendrickson/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joann
Collins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robert Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: TCO STOW Overage - 1/24

Kara/Heidi, please give this to Brian and Melissa.

Because the burns significantly increased on 1/24 from the forecasted amount
(+16749). Contract #63281 was over-run and Storage #51407 was over-withdrawn.
Contract over-run is $.21 per dkt and storage over-withdrawls are $10 per dkt.

Because the forecast was lower, I let Joann use the extra space for CES
Enduser Market. TCO will let me cut gas to CES Enduser Markets as a retro.
Not sure if you want this gas to flow or try to make it up over the weekend.
If you need the gas to flow because of OFO penalties, maybe the storage
over-withdrawal is cheaper than incurring OFO penalties. Please tell me what
you want me to do. Need to do the retro's ASAP while TCO is still feeling
generous.

FYI, the traders at Enron talked to Noel Bartlo on Tuesday. Noel said any
costs over the space that retail had (134,710 for choice), Enron had the
right to pass on the costs. I really hope the Noel communicated that to CES
Retail. I would hate to have a huge misunderstanding between Enron and CES
Retail. Remember, we schedulers are caught in the middle... and don't try to
cause unnecessary pain.

63281/236 coh 7-1  2934/2872
63281/170 coh 7-5  1922/1881
63281/99 coh 5-2  427/418
63281/221 cpa8-35 1639/1604
63281/220 cpa8-35 511/500

Total    7433/7275


this is a draft undertaking for all defendants who ask Enron to advance the
expenses of litigation.  Please let me have any comments.  while there is no
urgency for the defendants who are still associated with us, I think we
should send the undertaking to Andy's lawyer ASAP.
-----Original Message-----
From: Hampton, Wallis
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 9:58 AM
To: Schwartz, Charles
Subject: Enron: Undertaking

                                         ++++++CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE+++++
The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged.  This
email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization
named above.  If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized
representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any,
or the information contained herein is prohibited.  If you have received
this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email
and delete this email from your system.  Thank You
 <<697659_1.WPD>>

 - 697659_1.WPD


Due to conflicting schedules and legislative meetings, the 2:00 PM
Conference call is cancelled for today.

Julee Malinowski-Ball
Senior Associate
Edson + Modisette
916-552-7070
FAX-552-7075
jmball@ns.net
FAX-552-7075
jmball@ns.net


Mary,  I looked into your idea regarding using an index price approach along
the lines of the tariff that was approved for EPMI's market based sales to
PGE in Docket No. ER99-364-000.  I agree that the current situation is quite
similar to that.  thus, since the current proposal is similar to one that has
already been accepted, the matter is less controversial than I originally
thought and I do not think that this would entail much additional research.
Nor do I think that we necessarily need to pre-screen this with FERC since
that would delay the filing.  I would therefore revise my RCR projection to
$5,000 to prepare the filing and suggest that we simply file it.  (I would
let you know if I think it is more complicated once I dig in.)

FYI, I ran this through Dan, and he agrees with the foregoing.  As before,
however, we cannot get FERC approval within the time frame contemplated by
the RFP.  I agree with you that the conservative and preferable (from a
legal/regulatory perspective) way to proceed is to make your proposal to PGE
subject to FERC approval.  Since time is of the essence, let me know when to
begin, and we'll jump on it right away.  Ron

>>> <Mary.Hain@enron.com> 03/13/01 12:48PM >>>
Portland General Electric (PGE) has a request for proposals (RFP) that EPMI
wants to submit an offer on.  PGE is essentially seeking a fixed price for
50-200 MW 'round the clock for five years starting in '02 at Portland's
system, the Mid-C, or COB South to North.  Offers are due by March 28 and
PGE has until April 5, 2001 to accept .

I have told Mike that any deal with PGE has to be approved by FERC under
the terms of EPMI's market based rate tariff.  I have also told him that
EPMI could either make the offer subject to FERC approval or take the
regulatory risk that FERC would in some way change the benefits of any
contract in PGE's favor.  I would recommend the former.  Ron - would you
tell me how much you would charge to draft a FERC filing, for my review,
in the event PGE accepts our offer?  Jim - I intend to submit an RCR for
this FERC filing.  Is that okay?


Hi Carlos,

I'm back in DC, at the Willard, so I'm thinking of you.  We (the commercial
leads and I) will be in Richmond tomorrow for negotiations, then back
tomorrow night at the
Willard.

I hope things are ok for you. I know it is probably stressful. Hang in there.

Kay


May have to reschedule until the end of next week to bring Bruce to Houston.  What does Thurs/Friday of next week look like.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Thomas, Jake
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 11:36 AM
To:	Whitt, Mark; Walton, Steve
Subject:	RE: Buffalo Power Company LLC - Gas Turbine Power Plant Project

That actually works out perfect for my schedule

Jake Thomas
503-464-3803

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Whitt, Mark
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 10:18 AM
To:	Thomas, Jake
Cc:	Bump, Dan J.; Walton, Steve
Subject:	FW: Buffalo Power Company LLC - Gas Turbine Power Plant Project

Can we meet next Tuesday on October 30th?  Afternoon is prefferable.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Walton, Steve
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 11:12 AM
To:	Whitt, Mark
Subject:	RE: Buffalo Power Company LLC - Gas Turbine Power Plant Project

I am booked all of this week.  Tuesday of next week might work if in the afternoon so I could fly in that morning.

Steve

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Whitt, Mark
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 3:32 PM
To:	Thomas, Jake; Walton, Steve
Subject:	RE: Buffalo Power Company LLC - Gas Turbine Power Plant Project

It works for me.  Steve, would that be possible for you?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Thomas, Jake
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 2:03 PM
To:	Whitt, Mark; Walton, Steve
Subject:	RE: Buffalo Power Company LLC - Gas Turbine Power Plant Project

I have already made plans for the 14th - How about later this weeks or early next. ?

Jake Thomas
503-464-3803

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Whitt, Mark
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 12:36 PM
To:	Walton, Steve
Cc:	Thomas, Jake
Subject:	RE: Buffalo Power Company LLC - Gas Turbine Power Plant Project

I have to go to the management meeting in San Antonio on the afternoon of the 14th.  Would it be possible to meet in Denver on the morning of the 14th?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Walton, Steve
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 10:24 AM
To:	Whitt, Mark; Kaufman, Paul; Calger, Christopher F.
Cc:	Tycholiz, Barry; Bump, Dan J.
Subject:	RE: Buffalo Power Company LLC - Gas Turbine Power Plant Project

Mark,

	I am committed to a meeting in Seattle with the Western Governors and the FERC on November 1 and 2 respectively.  The next meeting of the Wyoming Energy Commission is on November 12-13 in Evanston and a meeting in Spokane on the 15th, leaving the 14th open.  I know that is beyond your two week window, but it would be the best time for me.

Steve

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Whitt, Mark
Sent:	Friday, October 19, 2001 3:51 PM
To:	Walton, Steve; Kaufman, Paul; Calger, Christopher F.
Cc:	Tycholiz, Barry; Bump, Dan J.
Subject:	Buffalo Power Company LLC - Gas Turbine Power Plant Project

ENA and Crestone (Northern Border's non-regulated affiliate) met with a group of developers and Joe Meyer, Secretary of State in Wyoming, who have proposed to build a 200 MW power plant (expandable to 500 MW) in the Powder River basin of Wyoming.  Their "angle" is that the existing utility, Powder River Electric Coop, cannot meet the demand for electricity and the necessary distribution infrastructure to maintain the pace of development in the Coal Bed Methane BOOM that is happening in the basin.

As you may or may not know, Enron has been very involved in this Coal Bed Methane play since 1998.  ENA is the largest purchaser of 3rd party gas in the basin and Crestone is the largest non-producer gathering company in the basin.  Crestone has a gathering trunkline located near their proposed site.  The developers will be filing a petition to remove this area from the COOP's certificated territory in the next couple of weeks.

There are obviously regulatory issues revolving around their ability to gain access to this "retail" market and the project would not be economically feasible as a merchant plant in the wholesale market.  However, they seem to have some political backing.

These developers recognize that they need Enron's assistance in developing this project on three main fronts:

1.  Power Marketing and Project development
2.  Gas Supplies and Pipeline access
3.  Regulatory and Transmission expertise

Given the fact that Joe Meyer is the early favorite to be the next Wyoming Governor and we are trying to work well with the State of Wyoming, and we have a natural competitive advantage in this market from a gas supply and pipeline perspective, I would like to pursue this opportunity a little further.

Therefore, I am wondering if I could get a Sr. Commercial Power Representative and a Regulatory Representative (Steve Walton would be good since he will be on the Wyoming Energy Commission), to attend a meeting in Denver with myself and the Crestone representatives sometime in the next 2 weeks.

Please give me a call and I can elaborate on the opportunity or answer your questions.  I don't want to make this email a novel!

Thanks a lot.

303-575-6473


I must be working off the wrong group list, but I don't think you were on it
and Jeff Dasovich was on it and didn't know he was.  Anyway here is the mail
I sent out to kick things off the week before last and I'd welcome your
thoughts on how we might get the best out of the group.

Meeting in London is fine with me if you can all make it!  In the meantime,
it's probably worth having a conference call to discuss how we might do
things.

Loved Mr Woychick's comments about Philip by the way.  I've always thought he
was a prima donna and it was nice to hear Eric confirm it.

Cheers

Paul

---------------------- Forwarded by Paul Dawson/LON/ECT on 28/02/2000 13:35
---------------------------

Paul Dawson
18/02/2000 14:27
To: Structure Group
cc: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Maureen McVicker/HOU/EES@EES, Mark
Schroeder/LON/ECT@ECT, Fiona Sayers/LON/ECT@ECT, Philip Davies/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Market structure group

My apologies for not kicking things off earlier, but the regulator here has
conspired to make the last few weeks a bit mad.  Consequently, it's taken me
a while to set down some thoughts on how we might get the best out of the
market structure group.  Attached below is an initial stab at some "terms of
reference" to describe the scope and objectives of the group.  I thought this
might help us to come to a common understanding of what we are trying to
achieve.   I'm conscious that the one area that is a bit lacking is
"Deliverables", ie, what will we come up with as the output from this
process?  This needn't be a formal "report" - indeed I suspect that
establishing a regular process of information exchange and discussion is
likely to provide more durable benefits.

I'd very much welcome your views on our scope and objective over the next few
days.  I'd also welcome a brief update on which issues you are all working as
a way introducing our interest in the topic of market structure.  This should
also help to kick-start the process of exchanging ideas.  My own contribution
is below.

I've also attached a couple of documents that I think may be useful.  One I
prepared for the Federal Energy Commission in Russia as a statement of "What
is a foreign investor looking for in a liberalised market?"  It was written
for an audience for whom a competitive electricity market is an alien
concept.  For example, we were attempting to change the FEC's mindset that
power marketers were an unnecessary layer of costs - because their "tariff"
added to other participants tariffs would increase prices.  As a result it is
very high level and conceptual.  However, it has some value as a basic
delineation of where the key market structure issues lie.  The other
documents relate to the proposals for New Trading Arrangements in England and
Wales  (further information on these reforms can be obtained from the
regulator's website at http://www.ofgas.gov.uk/).  While far from perfect,
these reforms provide a good example of wholesale trading arrangement reform
for use elsewhere (for good or bad).

I'll be on vacation next week, but on my return I'd like to set up a video
conference/conference call to discuss how we can take things further.  Any
suggestions for agenda items for that would be most welcome.

Regards

Paul

------------------------------------------

UK Electricity

The regulators - Ofgem and the DTI are is undertaking a massive programme of
reforming the electricity market in England and Wales.  These reforms have
followed the UK government's moratorium on new gas plant in late 1997 and are
designed to remove perceived "distortions" in the market.  The reforms centre
on:

New Electricity Trading Arrangements (NETA) to replace the Pool from October
this year.  We have had a significant input into the this process.  While
generally supportive of the proposals, we have opposed several undue
restrictions on managing risk.
Plant divestment by major mid-merit generators to increase competition in the
price-setting part of the market.  We were instrumental in this process,
following our analysis late in 1997 of the costs of generator market power to
electricity consumers.  Divestment has since significantly increased the
liquidity and competition in the wholesale market.  Despite this the
regulator is seeking greater powers to intervene in the wholesale market to
prevent market "manipulation".  We think this represents an unacceptable
extension of regulatory power and are therefore likely to oppose the
regulator at the Competition Commission enquiry into this.
New transmission access and pricing arrangements.  While these reforms may
have limited merit, in general we think they're a waste of time and our
existing asset positions are significantly exposed.  The regulator has just
started consulting on this and this is one area that I suspect your
experiences in the US and elsewhere might be useful to me.


You have sent me some random e-mails lately. The reason they are leaving is because Broadband--move closer to your screen while I whisper-- is not making any freaking money. Yes I am going to South America. I don't know when. Why do you care about any of this--- is your ne'r do well brother-in-law one of these people??

	John Scott <JScott@SusmanGodfrey.com> 05/14/2001 04:26 PM 	   To: "'Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com'" <Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com>  cc:   Subject: RE: Energy

Digressing, why are so many tech department people receiving buyout
packages?

-----Original Message-----
From: Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com [mailto:Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 4:05 PM
To: John Scott
Subject: Re: Energy

Give me some details on the prices and I will run it by our traders.

                    John Scott

                    <JScott@SusmanGo        To:
"'richard.b.sanders@enron.com'" <richard.b.sanders@enron.com>
                    dfrey.com>              cc:

                                            Subject:     Energy

                    05/03/2001 11:43

                    AM

Richard-

I bought an apartment complex in Abilene (clearly trying to be like
Patterson).  The energy bills-all bills paid-are outrageous.  I am thinking
of getting a long term contract to cap energy costs.  Big question is
whether Texas rates are going to skyrocket?  Your opinion would be greatly
appreciated and rewarded with a free lunch at location to be determined by
you.

Doug said you came to town recently.  His son is on David Schmidt's team.
Tell Enron to relocate to the Fort.  It could rename Lagrave Field, Enron's
Lagrave Field.

John


Please increase deliveries to Eastrans to 7500 MMBtu/dy effective 10/19/00.

The redeliveries will be 7500 MMBtu/dy from Fuels Cotton Valley into HPL.


SK - I've printed these out.  mm

My (just over half a page) summaries of the main items are attached as
requested (in two separate documents, for first and second halves of 2000.)

Maureen McVicker@ENRON
01/04/2001 05:52 PM
To: Bill Donovan/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christie Patrick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cynthia
Sandherr/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Elizabeth Labanowski/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jackie
Gentle/LON/ECT@ECT, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Jane
Wilson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Joe Allen/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joe Hillings/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John
Ambler/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John
Hardy/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jose
Bestard/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Lindolfo Ernesto
Paixao/SA/Enron@Enron, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark
Schroeder/LON/ECT@ECT, Michael Terraso/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Mike
Dahlke/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mike G Smith/NA/Enron@Enron,
Nicholas O'Day/AP/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Peter
Styles/LON/ECT@ECT, Tom Briggs/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Geriann Warner/NA/Enron@Enron, Nina Garcia/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernadette
Hawkins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cindy Derecskey/Corp/Enron@Enron, Melinda
McCarty/Corp/Enron@Enron, Allison Navin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Marcia A
Linton/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: 2000 ACCOMPLISHMENTS

REMINDER:

Your list of accomplishments are due today.  Please email your response to
Steve Kean and copy me.

For those of you who have already responded - thank you.

Assistants:  please remind your people that these lists are due today.

Thanks.

----- Forwarded by Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron on 01/04/2001 10:42 AM -----

	Maureen McVicker
	12/22/2000 03:47 PM

		 To: Bill Donovan/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christie Patrick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cynthia
Sandherr/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Elizabeth Labanowski/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jackie
Gentle/LON/ECT@ECT, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Jane
Wilson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Joe Allen/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joe Hillings/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John
Ambler/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John
Hardy/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jose
Bestard/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Lindolfo Ernesto
Paixao/SA/Enron@Enron, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark
Schroeder/LON/ECT@ECT, Michael Terraso/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Mike
Dahlke/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mike G Smith/NA/Enron@Enron,
Nicholas O'Day/AP/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Peter
Styles/LON/ECT@ECT, Tom Briggs/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Cindy Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: 2000 ACCOMPLISHMENTS

Steve Kean would like each of you to send him a list of your accomplishments
for 2000.

If you have already provided the list to Steve, please disregard this email.

DUE DATE:  Close of business, Thurs., Jan. 4


Yes.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Keohane, Peter
Sent:	Monday, November 12, 2001 3:23 PM
To:	Heard, Marie
Cc:	Gaffney, Chris
Subject:	RE: Status of Agreements

Marie, can you and Chris make sure that you are on the same page with agreements affecting Canada, especially as it relates to registering security notices.

Peter.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Heard, Marie
Sent:	Monday, November 12, 2001 3:10 PM
To:	Aronowitz, Alan; Athena Alexander (E-mail); Clark, Morris; Cook, Mary; David Mitchell (E-mail); Davis, Angela; Del vecchio, Peter; Douglas, Stephen H.; Evans, Mark (London Legal); Gaffney, Chris; Gray, Barbara N.; Hansen, Leslie; Heard, Marie; Hendry, Brent; Hodge, Jeffrey T.; Johnston, Greg; Jones, Tana; Keohane, Peter; Koehler, Anne C.; Lech Kalembka (E-mail); Leite, Francisco Pinto; Marissa Morelle (E-mail); McCullough, Travis; Mellencamp, Lisa; Murphy, Harlan; Murray, Julia; Nemec, Gerald; Portz, David; Rick Antonoff (E-mail); Rohauer, Tanya; Sager, Elizabeth; Saxena, Rahul; Sayre, Frank; Schuh, Michael; Shackleton, Sara; Simons, Paul; St. Clair, Carol; Van Hooser, Steve; Viverito, John; Von Bock Und Polach, Marcus; Williams, Jason R (Credit)
Subject:	Status of Agreements

Per Carol's request, please e-mail Carol, Mary and me with an update on the agreements you are working on.

Thanks!

Marie


Thank you!