Executive Summary
?	California Treasurer Angelides Sets Dates for Bridge Loans & Bonds
?	California's Supreme Court May See Challenge to "Plan B"

Angelides on Bridge Loans and Bonds
CA Treasurer Angelides has said that beginning 15 August, the state will set up a bridge loan.  The revenue bonds will not be issued until September or October.  Angelides is not concerned about a cash crisis in July or August.  However, he is quite worried about problems with cash flow in October and November.  This is based on calculations he has done with numbers from the DWR and from other parts of the government, not on payment terms for power.  He fears there will be a cash management problem.

California Supreme Court to Challenge "Plan B"
California Attorney Michael Sturmwasser is expected to challenge "Plan B" before the California Supreme Court on the basis that it results in a retroactive rate increase and that it removes the PUC's authority to review power purchases.  This is because "Plan B" enables SoCal to collect a dedicated rate component to pay both its undercollect and its expenses going forward.  SoCal (and PG&E) would have to be guaranteed this dedicated rate component to be able to operate going forward and remain credit-worthy.  This takes the burden of financing the energy crisis away from the state and off the state's balance sheet, a key goal of lawmakers.  However, at the same time, it also abrogates the PUC from its responsibility to review power purchases.  The state cannot give the utilities a blank check (in the form of a dedicated rate component) to operate without taking authority away from the PUC.  According to the California constitution, the legislature can add to the responsibilities of the PUC, but it cannot take away powers from the PUC.  At the same time, ratepayers will be paying an additional surcharge for power that they have already used.  Sources describe Sturmwasser's case as "arguable"; in other words, it has a fair chance of succeeding.  However, regardless of whether the challenge succeeds or fails, it is very likely to cloud the issue of the bail-out and significantly deflate the prospects of the Plan B.

If FERC were to impose cost-based controls on power prices, sources believe it might "go a long way toward avoiding these problems."  Were this to happen, the PUC could declare FERC's rates "just and reasonable," which would likely greatly lessen the crisis and keep SoCal liquid.  However, such measures by FERC require significant lead time.  Sources state that "the state needs to tease the feds into doing this."  This can be done by conducting studies to obtain current cost data and update the data FERC would use for determining the cost controls.  Sources report that this process of "teasing" FERC has not yet started.  This is chiefly because California politicians are focused on flat price caps, which FERC is very unlikely to impose.  It appears the state is asking FERC for the wrong measures, which is delaying the process.  The only way for the state to avoid these constitutional issues would be for the state to purchase the utilities, as municipal entities would not be subject to PUC regulation.  However, there remains very significant opposition to this idea, especially on the Republican side.  A state purchase of the utilities would likely only gain momentum once Plan B began to fail for the reasons cited above.  Additionally, a state purchase of the utilities would be less expensive were both utilities in bankruptcy.

Sturmwasser is a partner at Sturmwasser & Woocher, a Santa Monica law firm.  (His offices are on the top floor of the tallest building in Santa Monica, overlooking the beach.)  He has been a utilities lawyer for over 30 years.  His clients include the consumer advocacy group TURN (Toward Utilities Rate Normalcy), among others.  Sturmwasser will reportedly look for funding to support the legal challenge, but if he cannot find money elsewhere, he will likely be able to support it out of his own pocket.


Randy, Becky and I just had a conference call with John Kroeger, attorney in
FERC's  Market Oversight and Enforcement Office, about the data request we
just received from them regarding gas deals into California for May 2001.  We
explained that the data request we just received was in many regards
identical to the one FERC staff sent us in December and which we answered in
January and we directed him to that response, both for the explanation of how
our business works and why we can therefore cannot answer the questions as
they were framed, and also for an example of what the data will look like for
the new time frame, if we submit it.  (We may have to file written consent
for Kroeger to review this previously filed data, which we agreed to do).
Mr. Kroeger stated they wanted the data request to be construed with common
sense (a refreshing notion).  He agreed that the"contracts" they want would
just be deal tickets for the applicable time frame.  He also indicated a
willingness to extend the time so that we can file information when we get it
in due course.  He will get back to us after he looks at the info already
filed in the SDG&E complaint.


FYI (Elizabeth, in case we are beginning to populate a data base, here is a filing that should go in).

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Judith Borrego" <jborrego@swlaw.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Judith+20Borrego+22+20+3Cjborrego+40swlaw+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Thursday, August 23, 2001 5:19 PM
To:	llawner@enron.com
Subject:	Conformed Copy of Post-Hearing Brief

Attached please find a conformed copy of the Post-Hearing Brief of Enron  and Midwest.

Judith Y. Borrego
Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.
One Arizona  Center
Phoenix , Arizona 85004-2202
602.382.6122 (direct)
602.382.6000  (main number)
602.382.6070 (fax)jborrego@swlaw.com

The information contained in this electronic mail message is confidential  information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above,  and may be privileged.  If the reader of this message is not the intended  recipient or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended  recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or  copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received  this communication in error, please immediately notify us by telephone  (602-382-6000), and delete the original message.  Thank you.

 - PostHrBriefEnrMid.doc


Gerald,

We have taken a first pass look through all the old San Arroyo files we
received from Enogex.  There seems to be very little information on the gas
gathering agreement.  There is a file on the gas gathering agreement, but it
is very incomplete and does not go back past Enogex's ownership.

I will fax you a letter from Lone Mountain to KN Energy dated 1998
concerning pressures on the Gathering system in the area, including some of
our non-op wells.  There is some old well by well data from 1994 that shows
well flowing tubing pressures at San Arroyo in the 80-90 psig range.
Gathering system pressures would need to be below those.  Some of the data
is before the execution of the gathering contract 1994 amendment. I can copy
those and send them to you if you so desire.

Ken Krisa

-----Original Message-----
From: Gerald Nemec [mailto:Gerald.Nemec@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, July 31, 2000 5:23 PM
To: kckrisa@worldnet.att.net
Subject: Pressure Data

Ken,  Wanted to check and see if you guys were able to find any pressure
data on
Wildhorse for the period of 3 years prior to the Effective Date of the
Gathering
Agreement?  I think Jim was going to look and see if he had any such data.
Thanks.


....just crazy, I've been dying to call you all day to make sure you were
okay but I figured your probably being bombarded with calls right now, so I
was just waiting for some time.  There are a lot of rumors out there? Are
you okay? The latest piece of news is your possible chapter 7 filing, and
I've been raking my mind trying to see if you guys will be taken care of in
that case. I know you all have personal contracts.  Its amazing how a great
company like Enron can come tumbling down to its knees.  I can't even
imagine the atmosphere over there, I was watching the screen as you guys
pulled all of your numbers, I really couldn't speak for a second.  This
industry is never boring that's for sure.  I've been getting calls from
everyone, it looks like the key word for the day is exposure....

-----Original Message-----
From: Crandall, Sean [mailto:Sean.Crandall@ENRON.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 3:41 PM
To: Gill, Kiran
Subject: RE: Hi

So what do you think?  Pretty wild, huh?

-----Original Message-----
From: Gill, Kiran [mailto:kiran.gill@neg.pge.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 12:51 PM
To: Crandall, Sean
Subject: Hi

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************

PG&E National Energy Group and any other
company referenced herein that uses the PG&E name or
logo are not the same company as Pacific Gas and
Electric Company, the regulated California utility.  Neither
PG&E National Energy Group nor these other
referenced companies are regulated by the California Public
Utilities Commission.  Customers of Pacific Gas and Electric Company
do not have to buy products from these companies in order
to continue to receive quality regulated services from the utility.


Alton,

Thanks for the concern. Fortunately, I transferred to one of Enron's pipeline companies in mid-September (just before things started getting really crazy). This is the most stable part of the company and we will survive no matter what ... although we may be owned by someone other than Enron. I was also fortunate to have very little Enron stock exposure. Many of my friends have not been so fortunate. They are losing their jobs plus they've lost most of their net worth.

Andersen is tight lipped because their butts are on the line also. I don't understand how they could have allowed Enron to guarantee so much debt and then keep it off-balance sheet.

Are you all going to Port Neches for Thanksgiving? Renee and I are going tonight. I hope that you all have a very nice Thanksgiving and Christmas.

Many Happy Returns,

Paul

-----Original Message-----
From: Heckaman, Alton [mailto:ALTONH@swiftenergy.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 5:53 PM
To: Y'barbo, Paul
Subject: Status

Someone was asking me the other day if I had
any friends at Enron....you came to mind!

Are you weathering the storm? Unbelievable
is the word that comes to my mind.

We use Andersen also and I know they are
quite "tight lipped" about the situation!

I sincerely hope everything works out for you
and the other Enron employees that have done
nothing more than "bust your rears" for the good
of the "Big E".

Stay in touch,

Alton D. Heckaman, Jr.
Swift Energy Company
Senior Vice President
Chief Financial Officer

-----
If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby
notified that any use, distribution or reproduction of this message is
prohibited.  If you have received this message in error please notify
Swift Energy Company immediately. Any views expressed in this
message are those of the individual sender and may not necessarily
reflect the views of Swift Energy Company.


I would like to place a $33 bid for Prentice


Hello Cara,

We have determined that the EOL Bridge in production is currently working and
handling time zone issue very well.
Back in June 2000, there is a bug, which related to time zone issue and we
fixed it since then. All deals that you
provided to us had entered before July 2000.

We will run a query to identify if there are any other deals, which have
similar problem with time zone.

Please let me know if you find more problems with EOL Bridge, we will fix it
immediately.

Your help is highly appreciated

Regards,
dluu

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Semperger, Cara
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2001 6:49 PM
To: Nat, Steve; Duong Luu/HOU/ECT@ENRON
Cc: Belden, Tim; Swerzbin, Mike; Symes, Kate; Scholtes, Diana; Crandall,
Sean; Alonso, Tom; Fischer, Mark; Badeer, Robert; Richter, Jeff; Mallory,
Chris; Motley, Matt; Driscoll, Michael
Subject: AN EOL GLITCH THAT HAS TO DO WITH APRIL DEALS

I ran across a bunch of EOL deals that have not represented the April Time
zones right. They marked through April 6th as PST. Daylight savings time is
on April 1.  I don't see any new deals so I am hoping that it was something
in the programming that was corrected.  Steve, we will let you know if we see
any new ones, but the latest one looks like it was done a while ago. All of
these deals are fixed.

347721
353734
353813
352524
361210
352809
346646
346647
352628
360473
360475
360477
360483
361244
366541
366543
346822
348162

Cara Semperger
03/23/2001 01:39 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: A whole bunch of deal errors that I want your opinion on .

I just ran a forward ob for April 2 to check for deals that are in PST when
they should be PDT.

Do you want to change all of these to PPT deals, or do you have time
constraints today?  I need these changed today because we are already setting
up for April.

SW Regions
347721
353734
353813
407053
352524
361210
352809
346646
346647
352628
360473
360475
360477
360483
361244
366541
366543
346822
348162

NW Regions
318870
349864

I am particularly worried about how these are corrected because they are long
term transmission deals that cannot be autoscheduled.
503107
503112


To:	Associate/Analyst Program Worldwide

From:	Ken Lay	Department:	Office of the Chairman

Subject:	Associate/Analyst Program	Date:	August 22, 2001

As most of you know, Jeff Skilling created the Associate/Analyst Program in 1990.  This Program is one of his most successful and important contributions to Enron, and will continue as a cornerstone of the Company.  It remains our single most important source of new talent.

The purpose of this memo is to reassure you that the direction, philosophy, and importance of the Program remains unchanged.  As we have said many times, most of our new businesses were created by graduates and members of the Program.  Many of the current leaders of our company are also graduates of the Program.

Three broad principles will continue to guide the direction of the Program.
?	We will have only one Associate/Analyst Program at Enron, and it is a Company asset.
?	We will have a "One Enron" presence on campus to provide clarity of message and purpose.
?	The Program is rotational in nature, and will prepare our future leaders for success by providing exposure to Enron's network of people and systems.

The business prospects for Enron, and the opportunities for personal growth and development have never been better.  We also enjoy the deepest and broadest talent pool we have ever had.  Each and every one of you can be a key contributor to making Enron the World's Leading Company.

cc:
Billy Lemmons - Associate/Analyst Program
John Sherriff - Associate/Analyst Committee Chair
Management Committee
Associate/Analyst Committee
Associate/Analyst Department
Human Resources Leads
Program PRC Reps
Program Supervisors

<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>


Steve,

Steve, this is the spreadsheet.

Also, please, let Shirley know if the dinner on Sun is OK.

Vince


Travis McCullough
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street EB 3817
Houston Texas 77002
Phone:  (713) 853-1575
Fax: (713) 646-3490
----- Forwarded by Travis McCullough/HOU/ECT on 07/24/2000 11:31 AM -----

	Travis McCullough
	07/24/2000 11:30 AM

		 To: chris.edmonds@truequote.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Revised Posting Agreement

Chris:  Attached is a revised draft of the Posting Agreement, marked to show
changes from the draft that we previously circulated.  Please feel free to
call Andy or I with any comments or questions regarding the attached.

Travis McCullough
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street EB 3817
Houston Texas 77002
Phone:  (713) 853-1575
Fax: (713) 646-3490


The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  , 2001 Carr Futures

The charts are now available on the web by clicking on the hot link(s)
contained in this email. If for any reason you are unable to receive the
charts via the web, please contact me via email and I will email the charts
to you as attachments.

Crude Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/crudespread32.pdf
Heat Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/heatspread32.pdf
Unleaded Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/unleadspread32.pdf

Heat Crack     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/heatcrack32.pdf
Gas Crack     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/gascrack32.pdf

Carr Futures
150 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 1500
Chicago, IL 60606  USA
Tel:  312-368-6149
Fax:  312-368-2281
soblander@carrfut.com
http://www.carrfut.com


Doug--
	We are working up a proposal for APS in Phoenix wherein they would share in a portion of the costs we incur to get the project's FERC application ready.  Tab 5 of the original cost book shows a cost of $8,750,301.  Is this still a good number to use for our APS proposal?  Let's talk Wed 1/23 if possible.

thanks
kh
x35559


Notice No. 01-79
March 5, 2001

TO:
ALL NYMEX/COMEX DIVISION MEMBERS
ALL MEMBER FIRMS
ALL CLEARING MEMBERS

FROM:
NEAL WOLKOFF

RE:
POSITION ADJUSTMENT DEADLINES FOR THE APRIL 2001
METAL AND ENERGY CONTRACTS [NYMEX RULE 9.04(P) AND
COMEX RULE 4.37(A)]

______________________________________________________________________________

 As a reminder, position adjustments for both NYMEX and COMEX Division metals
contracts are prohibited beginning on the tenth business day prior to the
first business day of the delivery month, and throughout the delivery month.
Therefore, all position adjustments of concurrent futures positions for the
April 2001 metals contracts must be completed prior to March 19, 2001.

 Additionally, position adjustments of concurrent futures positions for NYMEX
energy contracts are not permitted during the last three trading days of the
respective contracts.  Rules 9.04(P) and 4.37(A) are attached.

 If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact Nick Galati
at (212) 299-2920, Nick Falcone at (212) 299-2919, or Bonnie Yurga at (212)
299-2879.

NYMEX RULE 9.04 - CLEARING PROCEDURE

(P) Concurrent Futures Positions

(1) Concurrent long and short positions in the current delivery month may not
be offset by netting, transfer, expit, adjustment or any other bookkeeping
procedures, but each side must be offset by normal floor transactions in
accordance with Exchange Rules. Provided, however, that a clearing member
will be exempt from this requirement if: (I) one side of the concurrent
position is established the business day prior to the date that the offset
memoranda are filed with the Clearing House; (II) a clearing member filing
such offset memoranda can satisfy the Exchange at its request that the delay
in effecting the offset is attributed to an error in the filing of its
clearing sheets; and (III) by 10:30 a.m. on the same date that a clearing
member files such offset memoranda, the clearing member also files with the
clearing house an updated and accurate Long Open Interest Report.

(2) For the purposes of this Rule 9.04(P), the current delivery month for
energy futures contracts commences on the open of trading on the third
business day, prior to termination of the respective futures contract,
including the termination date. The current delivery month in platinum and
palladium commences on the tenth (10th) business day prior to the first
business day of the delivery month.

COMEX RULE 4.37A - CONCURRENT FUTURES POSITIONS

(1) Concurrent long and short positions in the current delivery month may not
be offset by netting, transfer, expit, adjustment or any other bookkeeping
procedures, but each side must be offset by normal floor transactions in
accordance with Exchange Rules. Provided, however, that a clearing member
will be exempt from this requirement if one side of the concurrent position
is established the business day prior to the date that the open positions are
filed with the Clearing House.

(2) For the purposes of this Rule 4.37A, the current delivery month for
metals futures contracts commences on the open of trading on the tenth (10th)
business day, prior to the first business day of the delivery month.
The current delivery month for Eurotop futures commences on the open of
trading on the tenth (10th) business day prior to the termination of the
respective futures contract, including the termination date.

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=tana.jones@enron.com&refdo
c=(01-79)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


Phil, heads up, i will need another wire for about 224,000. It will come from funds that I should receive today. I will get you specifics a little later.


Marnie -

I think I need to take a half day of vacation Friday, Oct. 20th.  I am
involved in some church activities next weekend and I won't find out if I
need this time off until tonight or Wednesday night.  Is that too short of
notice?


Find attached February's production data.


Jed,

Thanks for the response.

Phillip Allen


Without knowing what subcommittees you are going to set up for the exec.
committee members, I'll take the Analyst/Associate program.  We've been
incredibly successful with Wharton/Penn , and I'd like to replicate our
approach company wide.  I'm convinced with my help, we can do a world class
job.  I'd be happy to give my thoughts on off cycle hiring, and other ways to
improve the entire process (internal and external) around Enron.

Thanks.

Jeff


Teco Tap       10.000 / Enron ; 90.000 / HPL IFERC

LS HPL LSK IC       30.000 / Enron


CONFIDENTIAL AND LEGALLY PRIVILEGED

Julia/Mark

If and when we decide to file I agree with Sam's recommended "second best" approach set out below. Also note his opinion on the 30 day waiver in point 2.

Regards,

Marcus

-----Original Message-----
From: Samuel Behrends [mailto:SBEHREND@LLGM.COM]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 1:10 PM
To: Nettelton, Marcus; Catherine McCarthy
Cc: Sager, Elizabeth; Yvonne Coviello
Subject: RE: Draft of Market rate filing

          Marcus: Here are the others points I wanted to make, just briefly:

                1.  I still think I need to talk to FERC staff before we file.
     Here's why:
                    - - FERC, as you know, is about to issue a new rule
                       on market-based rate eligibility.
                    - - In the meantime, they've been kicking out a very
                      high percentage of MBR applicants for trumped up
                    reasons.  I.e., issuing deficiency letters on issues we
                    know they don't care about.  I think the real reason
                    is they don't want to issue a lot of approvals until the
                    new rule comes out.
                      - -  No matter how perfect our filing is, we're liable
                     to get kicked out, too.  They might not want to give
                     MBR to a new Enron entity until they see the new
                     rule.
                     - -    The best way to deal with that is to sit down with
                     staff, go over the draft page by page, and see
                     what more they want.  But that would take too long,
                     because of staff's schedule.
                     - -   The second best way is for me to call Dan
                    Larcamp or Mike Coleman, at FERC; tell them that
                    we're not in a huge hurry, but we really don't want a
                    deficiency letter; read him the language in the draft
                    about how we'll comply with the new rule, and see if
                    that's good enough.  If he suggests different
                    language, we'll have to put it in there.
                     - - Alternatively, if we really want to try to slide this
                    through without saying anything to FERC in
                    advance, we can file it, and just hope that the
                    language we have about complying with the new
                    rule  is good enough.   But that's really not what I
                    would recommend.

         If we do decide to call FERC, I could call right away, and probably get an answer in time to file today.  If not, then certainly tomorrow. Otherwise, we're pretty much ready.

             2.  I really do think that we could ask for 30 days without raising any eyebrows.

                                  Good luck, and I'll talk to you soon.

>>> "Nettelton, Marcus" <Marcus.Nettelton@ENRON.com> 10/30/01 09:35AM >>>
Catherine

Attached is a mark up of suggested changes to the filing as per my
voicemail earlier this morning.
In addition we will need to confirm whether Sandhills is a subsidiary of
Enron Corp.
We will be adding two contacts from our Regulatory Group.

Regards,

Marcus

-----Original Message-----
From: Catherine McCarthy [mailto:CPMCCART@LLGM.COM]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 6:32 PM
To: Nettelton, Marcus
Cc: Sager, Elizabeth; Samuel Behrends; Yvonne Coviello
Subject: RE: Draft of Market rate filing

Marcus,

  The attached revised draft "fixes" the ESVL/EVSL error.  Also, we
tried to catch the reference to ENA.  We will work on that further
tomorrow.  I wanted to send this draft to you now, however, so that you
could review it without constantly being distracted by seeing EVSL
throughout the document.  I know that would distract me.  I hope this
helps.

Cathy

>>> "Nettelton, Marcus" <Marcus.Nettelton@ENRON.com> 10/29/01 07:11PM
>>>
Catherine

ESVL Corp will be a wholly owned subsidiary of Enron Corp. not Enron
North America Corp. In addition I see that some of the letters have
become transposed and ESVL often reads EVSL.

With ESVL Corp being a wholly owned subsidiary of Enron Corp. there may
well be other changes that need to be made.

Will speak tomorrow.

Regards,

Marcus

-----Original Message-----
From: Catherine McCarthy [mailto:CPMCCART@LLGM.COM]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 5:53 PM
To: Nettelton, Marcus
Cc: Sager, Elizabeth; Samuel Behrends; Yvonne Coviello
Subject: RE: Draft of Market rate filing

The draft filing is attached.  We are working on adding headers to the
rate schedule and code of conduct.

Thank you for the information on New Albany.  I removed all references
to New Albany because we recently worked with Susan, Stuart and Robert
on that transaction.  Also we removed the references to five other
peakers Enron sold recently - we worked with Stuart to get those FERC
approvals.  In addition, we did not include a reference to North
Carolina Power Holdings, L.L.C. made in earlier filings.  We are aware
that Enron received 203 authorization to sell that entity earlier this
year.  We am uncertain about whether that transaction closed but we
assumed it did and removed it but need to confirm with you that it is
appropriate to remove it.

Thank you for the suggestion about updating the information from the
triennial filing.  We will certainly double check to make sure the
companies we have listed in the attached draft have not been sold.
Also, we refer to exhibit 2 to the triennial filing made on January 14,
2000 rather than listing the names of Enron's generating units with
market-based rate authorization whose output is dedicated under
long-term contracts.  We will confirm that this information is still
accurate as well.

Thanks again,

Cathy

Catherine P. McCarthy
LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae, LLP
1875 Connecticut Avenue, NW
Washington, DC  20009

(202) 986-8253
cpmccart@llgm.com

>>> "Nettelton, Marcus" <Marcus.Nettelton@ENRON.com> 10/29/01 06:11PM
>>>
Sam/Catherine

In addition to Sandhills Enron also made a 203 filing this year in
respect of the sale of the New Albany plant to Duke. You will probably
need to run a check on Enron at FERC to ensure that between us we have
identified any changes to the three year update for EPMI which was
prepared at the beginning of this year.

Kind regards,

Marcus

-----Original Message-----
From: Samuel Behrends [mailto:SBEHREND@LLGM.COM]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 2:48 PM
To: Nettelton, Marcus
Cc: Catherine McCarthy
Subject: Draft of Market rate filing

 Marcus - This is ready to go as soon its reviewed and we get the names.
If we can do that in the next 45 minutes, we can file today. Thanks

 0209376.01

========================================================================
======
This e-mail, including attachments, contains information that is
confidential and may be protected by the attorney/client or other
privileges.  This e-mail, including attachments, constitutes non-public
information intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s).
If you are not an intended recipient, please delete this e-mail,
including attachments, and notify me.  The unauthorized use,
dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this e-mail, including
attachments, is prohibited and may be unlawful.

========================================================================
======

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient
(or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender
or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and
delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments
hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not
create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron
Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other
party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by
estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************

========================================================================
======
This e-mail, including attachments, contains information that is
confidential and may be protected by the attorney/client or other
privileges.  This e-mail, including attachments, constitutes non-public
information intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s).
If you are not an intended recipient, please delete this e-mail,
including attachments, and notify me.  The unauthorized use,
dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this e-mail, including
attachments, is prohibited and may be unlawful.

========================================================================
======

========================================================================
======
This e-mail, including attachments, contains information that is
confidential and may be protected by the attorney/client or other
privileges.  This e-mail, including attachments, constitutes non-public
information intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s).
If you are not an intended recipient, please delete this e-mail,
including attachments, and notify me.  The unauthorized use,
dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this e-mail, including
attachments, is prohibited and may be unlawful.

========================================================================
======

==============================================================================
This e-mail, including attachments, contains information that is confidential and may be protected by the attorney/client or other privileges.  This e-mail, including attachments, constitutes non-public information intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s).  If you are not an intended recipient, please delete this e-mail, including attachments, and notify me.  The unauthorized use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this e-mail, including attachments, is prohibited and may be unlawful.

==============================================================================


Sara:

How much protection do the agreements give us?  I have always assumed that they were primarily for the benefit of the brokers.  Of course, in the U.S. they are probably required by the SEC and in a country where they are not required you have to wonder how well the brokers are being policed by regulators.  I guess it makes sense to at least contact local counsel to find out what protections there are for the customer and whether or not it would be reasonable to ask for something in writing.  I don't think we need written opinions of counsel.  It might also make sense to explain to the business folks that we think there is incrementally greater legal risk in using those arrangements and that while they may be permitted to use them they should keep activities to a minimum where there is a more secure alternative.

Sorry for rambling.

Mark

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shackleton, Sara
Sent:	Tuesday, October 02, 2001 8:39 AM
To:	Taylor, Mark E (Legal)
Subject:	FW: Increase in Demand for Brokerage Agreements

Mark:  Can you please reply to (1) below?
Also, any ideas for help with brokerage agreements?
Thanks.  Sara

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shackleton, Sara
Sent:	Monday, September 24, 2001 6:26 PM
To:	Taylor, Mark E (Legal)
Subject:	Increase in Demand for Brokerage Agreements

Mark:  Please read the attached message.

(1)  Are there any issues with following the "custom" in countries not requiring an executed "executing brokerage agreement"?  Do we need to contact outside counsel in each country?

(2)  I anticipate that I will really need help on the brokerage agreement side.  I cannot keep up now on a "timely" basis.

Gary's world occupies about 50% of my time.
Enron Corp. occupies about 25% of my time.

Thanks.  Sara

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Brogan, Theresa T.
Sent:	Monday, September 24, 2001 6:04 PM
To:	Lowry, Donna; Schultz, Cassandra; Bradford, William S.; Shackleton, Sara
Cc:	Hickerson, Gary; Heard, Marie
Subject:	Metzler Capital Markets - Executing broker agreement

To all,
	We have expanded equity trading into the European Markets.  Along with that, you will see an increase of executing broker agreements that specialize in foreign equities.  We plan on executing a broker agreement with Metzler Capital Markets for the purposes of order flow and specialty in Italian equities.  Currently no documentation is required and we would still clear all transactions with our existing Primebrokers, Goldman, Morgan Stanley and Bear Stearns.  In addition, Metzler clears their transactions through Paribas Milan.

Thanks,
Theresa


Am I taking care of you or what??
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/HOU/EES on 02/20/2000 05:30
PM ---------------------------

Lynn Dunphy@ECT
02/18/2000 01:48 PM
To: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: One more for Mark Metts

Steve -

One more person for Mark Metts to consider... Neerav Nanavaty was caught up
in the APACHI restructuring, and apparently they were unable to  promote him
to Manager.  (Our lists indicated that he would have been promoted in March).

Cheers!
Lynn


The attached files contains our daily volume requirements for  5/31 and  the
following day(s) as listed .    In each file there are three  worksheets
labelled as follows:

'Total Reqs':  Contains the volumes that CES is requesting from Enron at each
of the delivery points and dates indicated in the columns labelled "NOM".
The
Enron schedulers will want to check this sheet to see how much gas is needed
at
a specific point.   The AGL volumes are not timely and should be ignored until
further notice.    CES schedulers note:  the attached file is archived on
P:\Energy Ops\Enron\JUN_00\Daily\ *.xls, so you don't have to save a duplicate
copy elsewhere on the network.
'Daily Change' :  shows the change (increase +/decrease -) in the daily volume
needed from Enron at the designated citygate delivery point relative to the
supply volumes arranged previously with Enron prior to the current date.  For
the current gas day, the change is an intra-day change and is calculated using
the previous day's volume request for the current day (e.g., If the current
gas
day is 3/28, then the change is computed with respect to the 3/27 request for
3/28.  Note that this procedure assumes that the prior day supply change was
in
fact effectuated).  For tomorrow's gas day and any subsequent ones shown, the
change is computed as the latest Dth Nomination requirement less the
First-of-the-month supply volume plus or minus any adjustments made since the
first-of-the-month to the FOM supply for the (future) days shown.  (e.g., If
today is 3/28, then the change for 3/29, 3/30, etc. is computed with respect
to
the first-of-the-month volumes for those days adjusted for any additional
purchases or sell-backs since the first-of-the-month thru 3/27.)   This sheet
should be useful in determining prices for daily changes in gas volumes that
we
take or turn back.   The column labelled "ENA Daily Swing +/- vs FOM volume'
shows the absolute magnitude of the daily swings allowed by ENA at
pre-specified prices.  Prices for Swing volumes exceeding these magnitudes or
for swings at delivery points without pre-specified pricing must be
negotiated.
'Comments':

Please note that for the month of June '00 CES is purchasing additional
volumes
of gas from Enron for delivery to MME behind COH under a separate deal.  The
volumes shown here are entirely separate from the aforementioned deal.

Doug Kinney
Ph:  703-561-6339
Fax:  703-561-7317

 - 06-01-00 daily volsAM.xls


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 08/23/2000 08:40 AM -----

	Bradley Diebner
	08/22/2000 05:53 PM

		 To: Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli
Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Molly Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cynthia
Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary G Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Enron Europe Global
Contracts and Facilities, Enron Europe Global CounterParty, Stephanie
Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bradley Diebner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey
Richardson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Adnan Patel/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Claudia Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: EOL Credit Responses 08/22/00

The EOL approvals for 08/22/00 are attached below.

Regards,
bd


Gas Team:

Effective immediately, ALL binders that come from Beth Apollo's group MUST be checked out w/ Blanca Carrizales (Beth's Assistant) and Alex Gonzales (Beth's Clerk).

If you find you need to take it off of the 6th floor you MUST also get approval from Beth Apollo or A.K. Matheson.

Thank you.


----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 07/13/2000 12:43 PM -----

	"John W. Odam" <jodam@swbell.net>
	06/30/2000 12:40 PM

		 To: Brad_Cheney@enron.net
		 cc: "Richard B. Sanders" <Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com>
		 Subject: Re: Dig up in Texas by PFNet

Brad:

First, let me say yes, if you want me to, I can write the company and "put
them on notice" that you will invoice them. Also, alert them that we would
consider court action if it occured again.  Let me know and I will proceed.

Second, yes, we could file an injunction if necessary Obviously that would
involve more time and expense, hearing, probably opposition by the other
company and see what a court would do.  We could use as grounds they have
already done it, are working in the area and, unless under court order to
stay a distance away, would be likely do it again.  Also, we could ask for
damages for everything involved by EBS, repair, disruption, etc.

Both of these are things that Richard Sanders would have a view on I am
sure, so I am cc'ing him on this.  Again, let me know what you would like to
do re court action.

I will await hearing from you.

John
----- Original Message -----
From: <Brad_Cheney@enron.net>
To: <jodam@swbell.net>
Cc: <richard_sanders@enron.net>; <Bob_VanOrder@enron.net>;
<David_Rawlings@enron.net>; <Bob_Martin@enron.net>;
<David_Leatherwood@enron.net>
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2000 10:48 AM
Subject: Dig up in Texas by PFNet

>
>
> John,
>              We were dug up at two locations between Liberty and Beaumont
by a
> contractor working for PF Net on Monday, June 26.  The contractor was
Dan-Rik
> Construction Company out of Lafayette, La.   The contractor hit and
damaged our
> facility at two locations, one being between our existing splice # 1 and
splice
> #2,  three thousand feet of China.   The other location is under a canal,
in the
> same vicinity.
>
>    The contractor contact information is : Dan Rik Construction Company
>
PO
> Box 92868
>
> Lafayette, La. 70509
>
>
> Tel: 318.232.2488
>
> They are a sub-contractor to: Manuel Brothers, Inc.
>                                                           908 Taylorville
Road,
> Ste. 104
>                                                           Grass Valley,
Ca.
> 95949
>
>                                                            Tel:
530.272.4213
>
>    We are in the process of  restoring our facilities and will invoice
'Dan Rik
> Construction'  all costs associated with the restoration.   PF Net is
following
> our route through Texas into Louisiana and I am concerned about dig-ups
that may
> occur bwtween China and the Louisiana border.  Is an injunction the only
way to
> keep them a safe and reasonable distance from our facitlity?  Can we
somehow put
> them on notice that we won't tolerate any future dig-ups and that if they
do
> damage our facility, we will replace it from splice to splice at their
expense?
> Please let me know.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Brad Cheney
>
>
>


SENT ON BEHALF OF ROB HEMSTOCK:

Please see attached the letter that was sent to the Alberta Government and
Power Pool of Alberta today.


FYI, Kim.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rapp, Bill
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 9:51 AM
To:	Watson, Kimberly
Subject:	FW: Red Rock filing

Kim,

	This was filed yesterday.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Martens, Donna
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 9:37 AM
To:	Rapp, Bill
Subject:	Red Rock filing


Mr. Priest,

Attached for your review is a draft of a Master Firm Purchase/Sale Agreement
between Enron North America Corp. and the Public Service Commission of Yazoo
City.

Please do not hesitate to give me a call with any questions and or comments
you may have regarding this matter.

Regards,
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


What will you be doing?  You guys aren't moving are you?

Kevin


Gregg,
I used the following counterparties in the query:

Central Illinois Public Service Company
Central Illinois Light Company
Illinois Power Company
Northern Indiana Public Service Company
Nicor, Inc.
Nicor Energy LLC.
Nicor Enerchange LLC.
Nicor Gas Company
Nicor Gas Marketing Company
Nipsco Industries, Inc.
Nipsco Energy Services, Inc.
NiSource Capital Markets, Inc.

The only deals I came up with were with Nicor.  If you have any questions,
don't hesitate to call me.

DG    3-9573

	From:  Gregg Penman @ ENRON                           07/21/2000 04:09 PM

To: Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kevin P Radous/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Existing Deals

Thanks for the list of existing transactions.  Only one question, it looks
like the list includes only the different corporate entities of NICOR.  Does
that mean that there were no existing transactions with the other Corporate
families, i.e. NIPSCO, CILCO, PGL and NS?

Thanks,

Gregg
---------------------- Forwarded by Gregg Penman/Corp/Enron on 07/21/2000
04:05 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Kevin P Radous                           07/21/2000 11:40 AM

To: gregg.penman@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Existing Deals

Gregg,

Attached is a list (forwards detail by risk type) disclosing all the deals
that Darron could come
up with given your parameters.

Glad the risk management group could be of some assistance.

KR
---------------------- Forwarded by Kevin P Radous/Corp/Enron on 07/21/2000
11:38 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Darron C Giron @ ECT                           07/21/2000 10:56 AM

To: Kevin P Radous/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Existing Deals


waaaaa! waaaaa! you notice that she didn't mention the corps of cadet members
that tackled and beat on women after texas victory in college station a
couple of year back

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Shanna Husser @ EES                           11/30/2000 10:36 AM

To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: aggie/longhorn letter

Something to get you ALL riled up!!  And you talk about LSU fans being bad-
"Kill him"!!!
---------------------- Forwarded by Shanna Husser/HOU/EES on 11/30/2000 10:35
AM ---------------------------

Christina Barthel
11/30/2000 09:43 AM
To: Shanna Husser/HOU/EES@EES, Kim Chick/HOU/EES@EES, Leon
Branom/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jason Sharp/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt,
James Hollman/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robert B Cothran/Corp/Enron@ENRON, "Meredith"
<meredith@friersoncpa.com>, "Zogheib, Lisa A" <Lisa_Zogheib@AIMFUNDS.COM>,
"Kelly Kohrman" <pyrowoman@hotmail.com>, "Ashley"
<Ashley.Victorick@coastalcorp.com>, "Jaimie" <Jaimie.Parker@coastalcorp.com>,
"Erin" <elaggie99@hotmail.com>, "Anthony" <urbanaj@texaco.com>, "Jose"
<jose.a.suarez@us.pwcglobal.com>, "Albert" <albert.r.ferrel@exxon.com>,
"Oscar " <oscgarcia@notes.primeco.com>, "Misti" <mkuehn@tcresidential.com>
cc:
Subject: aggie/longhorn letter

---------------------- Forwarded by Christina Barthel/HOU/EES on 11/30/2000
09:39 AM ---------------------------

Amy.Jon@enron.com on 11/30/2000 09:37:29 AM
To: Christina.Barthel@enron.com, kchick@enron.com, dflinn@enron.com,
Lynna.Kacal@enron.com, "Leigh Ann Perry" <aotleighann@hotmail.com>,
aramirez@enron.com, "Michelle" <mtram@nccol.com>, "Sponge" <CZachgo@aol.com>
cc:
Subject: FW: Are we surprised to hear this?

 "Conduct of Texas Fans at Friday's Football Game Dismays Former Student"

 November 28, 2000

 Dear Battalion and Daily Texan:

Please help me.  As a product of both Texas A&M and the University of
Texas - Austin, I thought I had learned a lot.  But I experienced some new
things at the football game this past Friday that my education had not
prepared
me for.  No doubt there are Longhorn scholars who can set me straight.  I
watched many joyful Texas fans along with a few Aggies tailgating and
carousing.  Super.  Fall football rivalry.  Spirits were literally in
abundance.  May the better football team win.

Then I saw things that I cannot really comprehend.  I saw a Longhorn fan
with a t-shirt showing a fallen-over Bonfire.  The caption read, "What's
wrong, Aggies? Can't keep it up?"  Can someone explain that to me?  I do
not get it.  I assure you, I get the sexual nuance - I just do not understand
evil.

I saw Longhorn fans mocking and taunting the fans from A&M who were in
Corps of Cadets uniforms.  "Little Hitlers," they were called.  They were
being
spat at.  Help me to understand this Longhorn slant on rivalry.  I
thought we were all against Hitler - Longhorns and Aggies.

I saw a Longhorn cheerleader - isn't he supposed to represent UT in the
finest possible way?  - run in front of the Aggie Band, turn and face it
square on and salute with the clicked heels, arm-above-head, "Heil
Hitler" sign.

What don't I know here?  What didn't I learn in history class?  All these
things happened before kickoff.

Aggies, I respect your presentation of a $50,000 endowed scholarship as a
thank-you for UT's respect and support shown last year.  That support
obviously came from the finer Horns.  I admired the fortitude and
restraint exercised by the Corps of Cadets under attack.

Unfortunately, I learned that hundreds and hundreds of Longhorns have
More than one way to show the Hook 'em Horns sign.  They prefer to use their
middle finger.  Class.  Really intelligent and creative.  That will
quickly teach those "littlest" Longhorns how to show spirit.  I just pray they
get an honest chance to choose.

I am learning.  I have attended both schools.  I will choose the higher
ground.

Susan Priest
Classes of '77 and '81
>
>


Thanks.

Santiago

Errol McLaughlin
05/03/2001 03:45 PM
To: Santiago Garcia/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: NYMEX Settles

Santagio,

Attached are the NYMEX settles from Jan '98 forward.

Thanks,

Errol


A little greater  minutia


A position has recently become available in the Real Time Trading group
reporting to Bill Williams.  Bill will be holding an information session on
Thursday, April 19, 2001 at 11:00 am in Mt Hood for anyone who would like to
learn more about this opportunity.  Interested candidates should let Amy
FitzPatrick know by close of business on Monday, April 23, 2001.

Real Time Trading
Real Time Trading is responsible for the physical and financial integrity of
prescheduled energy transactions.  This includes managing curtailed schedules
and preserving Enron,s financial rights with non-performing trading
counterparties.  The group is required to maintain records and update
databases that explain supply or market interruptions in order to minimize
customer billing dispute issues.

In addition, Real Time Trading is responsible for the hourly trading of
energy in the California ISO and bilateral markets.  Traders are expected to
initiate profitable trades while maintaining an acceptable amount of risk
exposure to the company.  The group is expected to know all settlements
requirements and charges related to each type of trade.  Each trader is
capable of interfacing with customers and responding to internal and external
billing inquiries.

Real Time is required to administer terms of Service Desk contracts, which
may include the selling of excess generation and purchasing energy for
customer,s load requirement.  Also, each trader is responsible for gathering
and reporting information on unit outages, transmission line derations and
other information that is useful for all West Desk Trading activity.

Job Duties
? Confirm purchases and sale of power for Enron Power Marketing
? Work closely with volume, risk management, and dispute settlement groups
? Aid in preparation of price and deal reports and assist in the resolution
of volume/price discrepancies
? Interface with service and middle marketing customers to resolve real-time
questions and concerns
? Assist in testing and implementation of FSP and OATI real-time tagging
? Work closely with information technology and fundamentals group to maintain
and develop Real-Time tools and systems

Qualifications
? Bachelors in Finance, Business, Accounting or related field
? 1 to 2 years of previous power industry experience in WSCC is preferred.
? Excellent problem solving and communication skills
? Working knowledge of Excel, Access, Visual Basic and SQL
? Self motivated
? Detail oriented


Panie Tomaszu,

Prosze poinformowac kolegow, ze przesle moje uwagi
do niedzieli.

W. kaminski

VKaminski@aol.com on 01/30/2001 06:27:25 AM
To: vkamins@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Fwd: praca dyplomowa V Edycja MBA Warszawa

Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Return-Path: <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
Received: from  rly-yg02.mx.aol.com (rly-yg02.mail.aol.com [172.18.147.2]) by
air-yg03.mail.aol.com (v77.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 17:42:48 -0500
Received: from  postmaster.enron.com (outbound5.enron.com [192.152.140.9]) by
rly-yg02.mx.aol.com (v77.27) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 17:42:35 -0500
Received: from nahou-msmsw02px.corp.enron.com ([172.28.10.38]) by
postmaster.enron.com (8.8.8/8.8.8/postmaster-1.00) with ESMTP id WAA12034 for
<vkaminski@aol.com>; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 22:42:34 GMT
From: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
Received: from ene-mta01.enron.com (unverified) by
nahou-msmsw02px.corp.enron.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.1.5) with ESMTP
id <Tac1c0a265167d7e7b3@nahou-msmsw02px.corp.enron.com> for
<vkaminski@aol.com>; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 16:42:33 -0600
Subject: praca dyplomowa V Edycja MBA Warszawa
To: vkaminski@aol.com
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 16:42:46 -0600
Message-ID: <OF808FC319.178E22B2-ON862569E3.007CC06A@enron.com>
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on ENE-MTA01/Enron(Release 5.0.6 |December
14, 2000) at 01/29/2001 04:40:54 PM
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2
X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version)

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 01/29/2001
04:45 PM ---------------------------

"Scarbeko" <scarbeko@entropia.com.pl> on 01/29/2001 07:35:10 AM

To:   <vkamins@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:  praca dyplomowa V Edycja MBA Warszawa

Szanowny Panie Doktorze,

Na samym pocz?tku chcia?bym si przypomnie`.  Jestem studentem V edycji MBA?w Wy"szej Szkole Handlu i Finans?w  Midzynarodowych w Warszawie i wraz z
Panami Jerzym Seremakiem i Waldemarem  Mrozem piszemy u pana Doktora prac?dyplomow? z finans?w  midzynarodowych. Nsze prace przes?a?em do Pana
Doktora juz w listopadzie  ubieg?ego roku i do tej pory nie dosta?em
potwirerdzenia, "e Pan je otrzyma?.  Bardzo bym prosi? o potwierdzenie
otrzymania tych"e prac lub zaprzeczenie.
Panie Doktorze nastepna sprawa dotyczy zapytania  czy Pastwa Firma by?aby
zainteresowana inwestycjami w budow? elektrowni na  Ukrainie. Pracuj w?firmie konsultingowej kt?ra zajmuje si min. tego  typu biznesem. Nie jest
to dla nas pierwszy kontakt z tego rodzaju inwestycjami,  poniewa" w
obecnej chwili przygotowujemy sie do kontraktu? z  niemieck?? firm?
Lahmeyer International na budow elektrowni 150 MW  Szczeg?ly moge podac?je"eli Panstwo wyrazicie  zainteresowanie.??Z powa"aniem Tomasz  B?ach?????


haven't checked voice mail at home - in DC. have time to talk right now on phone?

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Foster, Gary" <GFoster@Antigenics.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Wednesday, October 03, 2001 2:45 PM
To:	Steffes, James D.
Subject:	did you get my response?


---------------------- Forwarded by Maria Sandoval/HOU/ECT on 11/13/2000
03:43 PM ---------------------------

Carrie Slagle
11/13/2000 03:00 PM
To: Molly Sumrow/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Harrison/HOU/ECT@ECT, Maria
Sandoval/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda Flores-Cuellar/NA/Enron@Enron, Kristin
Cantu/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: ANNE GEDDES PRESENTATION

 - ANN GEDDES .pps


AEP may be looking for some origination and marketing people.  Would you
consider Columbus, OH?

-----Original Message-----
From: Steffes, James D. [mailto:James.D.Steffes@ENRON.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 11:06 AM
To: beustis@romcapital.com
Subject: RE: FPL

I'll ask around floor.  Given my background, this position does not
sound like the best fit - I'd rather be more on the long-term
contracting (origination) side or business development.  Thanks for the
inquiry.

As you know, things are pretty crazy right now here at Enron.  I intend
to take the week off after Thanksgiving and intend to give you a call
during that period.  Have a great Thanksgiving.

Jim

>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	"Barbara Eustis" <beustis@romcapital.com>@ENRON
> Sent:	Tuesday, November 20, 2001 9:40 AM
> To:	jsteffe@enron.com
> Subject:	FPL
>
> Hi Jeff.
> Hope all is well.  I  have a position coming up for a trader at FPL in
> West
> Palm Beach - don't have many specifics yet, but they are dying for
> someone
> from Enron.  Would this be of interest to you or anyone you know?  Let
> me
> know.
>
> Hope you have a great Thanksgiving.  I look forward to hearing from
> you.
>
> Cheers,
> Barbara
>
>
> Barbara Eustis
> Principal
> Management and Capital Partners
> 805 Third Avenue
> New York, NY 10022
> office: 646-735-8872
> fax: 646-735-8888
> cell:  914-419-6590
> www.romcapital.com
> beustis@romcapital.com
>
>
>  - Barbara Eustis.vcf << File: Barbara Eustis.vcf >>

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************

 - winmail.dat


---------------------- Forwarded by Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT on 09/14/2000
02:57 PM ---------------------------

"Mike Gioffre" <dgioffre@hotmail.com> on 09/11/2000 05:08:19 AM
To: dmears8894@aol.com, reedbohner@aol.com, jpgiles@hotmail.com,
tom.giles@mail.house.gov, aukhound@aol.com, collins@archmereacademy.com,
wdonato@safegardgroup.com, bhickey@cmiprint.com, miorii@aol.com,
dcatalina@juniper.com, fatpatde@aol.com, rbeste1301@aol.com,
dhannum@philipinc.com, gioffrebnftsrvcs@cs.com, wgioffre@aol.com,
jasgioffre@aol.com, chris.hannum@ssmgroup.com, dhannum@earthlink.net,
gioffrem@aeltus.com, dgioffre@hotmail.com, sjs1516@earthlink.com,
dukern8@gateway.net, jim.rogers@libnet.com, cdolan@above.net, sncd@erols.com,
mdorgan@celestica.com, thdiaman@sordoni.com, benjamin.rogers@enron.com,
jpenney@hollandlessard.com, michelle.sautter@ibx.com, jverre99@hotmail.com,
lconte@hearst.com, elizabeth.sprich@marriott.com, clukawski@hitt-gc.com,
pfarinas@TVSA.com
cc:
Subject:

 > > This guy walks into a bar and two steps in, realizes it's a gay

 > > > >>>>bar but

 > > > >>>> > >decides, "What the heck, I really want a drink."

 > > > >>>> > >

 > > > >>>> > >When the gay waiter approaches he says to the customer,

 >"What's

 > > > the

 > > > >>>>name

 > > > >>>> > >of your penis?"

 > > > >>>> > >

 > > > >>>> > >The customer says, "Look, I'm not into any of that. All I
want

 >is

 > > > a

 > > > >>>> > >drink."

 > > > >>>> > >

 > > > >>>> > >The gay waiter says, "I'm sorry but I can't serve you until

 >you

 > > > tell

 > > > >>>>me

 > > > >>>> > >the name of your penis. Mine for instance is called Nike, for

 >the

 > > > >>>>slogan;

 > > > >>>> > >'Just Do It.' That guy down at the end of the bar calls his

 > > > >>>>Snickers,

 > > > >>>> > >because;

 > > > >>>> > > >'It really Satisfies.'"

 > > > >>>> > >

 > > > >>>> > >The customer looks dumbfounded so the bartender tells him he

 >will

 > > > >>>>give

 > > > >>>>him

 > > > >>>> > >a second to think it over.

 > > > >>>> > >

 > > > >>>> > >So the customer turns to the man sitting to his left who is

 > > > sipping

 > > > >>>>on a

 > > > >>>> > >beer and asks, "Hey bud, what's the name of your penis?"

 > > > >>>> > >

 > > > >>>> > >The man looks back with A smile and says, "TIMEX."

 > > > >>>> > >

 > > > >>>> > >The thirsty customer asks, "Why Timex?"

 > > > >>>> > >

 > > > >>>> > >The fella proudly replies, "Cause it takes a lickin' and
keeps

 >on

 > > > >>>> > >tickin!"

 > > > >>>> > >

 > > > >>>> > >A little shaken, the customer turns to the fella on his right

 > > > who's

 > > > >>>> > >sipping on a fruity margarita. "So, what do you call your

 >penis?"

 > > > >>>> > >

 > > > >>>> > >The man proudly exclaims, "FORD, because quality is Job1." He

 >then

 > > > >>>>adds,

 > > > >>>> > >"Have you driven a Ford, lately?"

 > > > >>>> > >

 > > > >>>> > >Even more shaken, the customer has to think for a moment

 >before

 >he

 > > > >>>>comes

 > > > >>>> > >up with a name for his penis. He turns to the bartender and

 > > > >>>>exclaims,

 > > > >>>>"The

 > > > >>>> > >name of my penis is Secret. Now give me my beer."

 > > > >>>> > >

 > > > >>>> > >The bartender begins to pour the customer a beer, but with a

 > > > puzzled

 > > > >>>>look

 > > > >>>> > >asks, "Why secret?"

 > > > >>>> > >

 > > > >>>> > >The customer replies, "Because it's STRONG ENOUGH FOR A MAN

 >BUT

 > > > MADE

 > > > >>>>FOR

 > > > >>>>A

 > > > >>>> > >WOMAN!"

 > >

 > >

 >

__________________________________________________________

Get your FREE personalized e-mail at http://www.canada.com

------- End of forwarded message -------

__________________________________________________________
Get your FREE personalized e-mail at http://www.canada.com

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.


Susan,

Please make sure both directories showing below are the same

HOUSTON ESTATE PRODUCTION
\\enehou\houston\appinst\enpower\enpower\Prod

PORTLAND ESTATE PRODUCTION
\\ectpdx-fs1\appinst\enpower\enpower\Prod

Check if Cara has the latest power.ini ( should be under c:\winnt\power.ini )

Check if c:\enpower\pdeal.exe is current
Check if c:\enpower\PreSchedWS.exe

Let me know !

Regards,
dluu

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Semperger, Cara
Sent:	Tuesday, January 29, 2002 10:20 AM
To:	Amador, Susan; Luu, Duong
Subject:	Enpower Login problems

I was able to login to the main platform of Enpower under csemper, but not able to run psw or deal entry.  However, I was able to login as drobins and run things.

Please do what you can to get my login fixed today if possible. I will use Donald's login as a workaround.

Thanks,

Cara


FYI

Rakesh Bharati
Phone: (713) 853-0936
Fax:     (713) 646-2503


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	Meet with Nancy Bagot Government Affairs

Date:		11/7/2000
Time:		4:00 PM - 5:00 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


Following please find the Daily EnronOnline Executive Summary.


I did write it for them, and sent it to Lynn.  We are waiting for them to
sign it and send it back.

Kay

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Mitch Robinson                           03/01/2001 09:26 AM

To: Stuart Zisman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Don Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re:

Sometimes the best way to get SW moving is to do the work for them.  We might
want to draft a proposed letter to get the ball rolling.  I would suggest
getting Allegheny to buy off on it.

Mitch

From: Stuart Zisman@ECT on 03/01/2001 09:15 AM
To: Don Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re:

----- Forwarded by Stuart Zisman/HOU/ECT on 03/01/2001 09:15 AM -----

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	03/01/2001 06:23 AM

		 To: Stuart Zisman/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re:

Lynn Dekrey is the guy Mitch negotiated the deal with.  Lynn left me a
message on Monday and said he didn't see a problem, but he didn't give me a
day we could expect the letter.  I would expect it this week.

ckm

From: Stuart Zisman@ECT on 02/28/2001 06:37 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re:

Who is Lynn and when can we expect the follow up letter (i.e. the one that
expressly permits an increase in output at the Wheatland Plant)?

Stuart


Thanks Carrie.

I went ahead and made the counterparty name change so that it will be
properly reflected next month.

Susan

Carrie Coldiron@ENRON
11/06/2000 09:47 AM
To: Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gregory Carraway/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Re: Nat Gas Basis Options-CHANGE TO DEAL

Susan,
I believe deal NK7690 is a Duke deal, and not EL Paso.  At least that is what
TAGG shows.  Would you please update your sheet to reflect the change for
next month.
Thanks so much,
Carrie
58465

Beatrice Reyna
11/03/2000 10:59 AM
To: Carrie Coldiron/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mechelle Stevens/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer
Blay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin Bosse/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rebecca Ford/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Nat Gas Basis Options

---------------------- Forwarded by Beatrice Reyna/NA/Enron on 11/03/2000
10:56 AM ---------------------------

Susan M Scott@ECT
11/03/2000 10:56 AM
To: Beatrice Reyna/NA/Enron@ENRON, Gregory Carraway/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Nat Gas Basis Options

Let me know if any of the deals values in the attached file are incorrect.

Thanks,
Susan


As always, your thoughts are extremely gracious and most appreciated.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dernehl, Ginger   On Behalf Of Shapiro, Richard
Sent:	Tuesday, November 20, 2001 9:50 AM
To:	Alamo, Joseph; Allegretti, Daniel; Allen, Joe; Alvarez, Ray; Assad, Sergio; Assaf, Lisa; Ausenhus, Kara; Barnes, Lynnette; Bellas, Kirsten; Bestard, Jose; Binns, Darran; Bolton, Scott; Boston, Roy; Braz, Gisele; Buerger, Rubena; Burns, Stephen; Canovas, Guillermo; Cantrell, Rebecca W.; Comnes, Alan; Connor, Joe; Cooney, Carolyn; Cooper, Adam N; Crowther, Mark; Dasovich, Jeff; Davies, Philip; Dawson, Paul; Decker, Larry; Dernehl, Ginger; Dressler, Jean; Elms, Nick; Fitzgibbon, Tom; Floris, Vinio; Frank, Robert; Fromer, Howard; Fulton, Donna; Gottfredson, Bryan; Grimes, Michael; Guerrero, Janel; Haizmann, Jan; Hamilton, Allison; Hardy Jr, John; Hartfield, Rita; Hawkins, Bernadette; Hemstock, Robert; Hennemeyer, Paul; Hetrick, Nancy; Hoatson, Tom; Huertas, Alfredo; Hueter, Barbara A.; Hughes, Llewelyn; Hunter, Bevin; Huson, Maggy; Ibrahim, Amr; Imai, Makiko; Kaufman, Paul; Kean, Steven J.; Keenan, Amber; Keene, Patrick; Kimura, Takashi; Kingerski, Harry; Kishigami, Kikumi; Knight, Laurie; Landwehr, Susan M.; Lassere, Donald; Lawner, Leslie; Lawrence, Linda L.; Leibman, Lara; Leonardo, Samuel; Levy, Alberto; Lindberg, Susan; Linnell, Elizabeth; Long, Chris; Mara, Susan; Maurer, Luiz; McVicker, Maureen; Migden, Janine; Milano, Pamela; Miller, Terri; Montovano, Steve; Nersesian, Carin; Neustaedter, Robert; Nicolay, Christi L.; Nord, Sue; Noske, Linda J.; Novosel, Sarah; O'connell, Earlene; Ogenyi, Gloria; Palmer, Germain; Perez, Carmen; Perez, Gus; Perrino, Dave; Petrochko, Mona L.; Pharms, Melinda; Reis, Jose Lucio; Reyna, Margo; Rishe, Frank; Rizzo, Helen; Roan, Michael; Robertson, Linda; Robinson, Marchris; Rodriquez, Andy; Ryall, Jean; Sampaio, Fred; Shapiro, Richard; Shelk, John; Shortridge, Pat; Staines, Dan; Steffes, James D.; Stephens, Sharonda; Stransky, Joan; Stroup, Kerry; Stubbings, Randy; Styles, Peter; Sullivan, Kathleen; Sullivan, Lora; Thome, Jennifer; Tiberi, Fino; Twiggs, Thane; Van Biert, Teun; Walton, Steve; Warner, Geriann; Watanabe, Mika; Wood, Doug; Yeung, Charles; Yoho, Lisa
Subject:	American Thanksgiving
Importance:	High

A few months ago, I sent a note to the North American Government Affairs group commemorating a bit of an end point in our efforts relative to California.  In that memo, I included a quote that went as follows ? "What we do in life echoes through eternity".  I think of these words often and believe them more than ever, particularly after the events, both external and internal to Enron, of the last few months.  I do not know for sure what the next few weeks or months will bring for any of us, but I do know that what we've done here at Enron in Government Affairs over the last several years, whether in Houston, Washington, London, Brussels, Sao Paulo, etc. was very good and will be remembered for the positive difference that we have all made in the industries in which we have worked and for each other.  We even had a good time doing it.  The good work we do will go on for many, if not, all of us . . . for some, here; for others, elsewhere.

Regardless of what the future holds, we should all be quite proud of what we have accomplished here and how it has been accomplished.  My personal appreciation for all that you have done as well as at having had the opportunity to be part of a group that, unfortunately, will be inalterably impacted and changed over the next few weeks, is boundless.  Irrespective of where these changes may take any one of us, I will continue to do all I can to earn your trust and respect.

On a more holiday-related note, for those in the U.S., who are working this week, please feel free to leave as early as possible on Wednesday in advance of Thanksgiving to spend time with your families or loved ones.  For those not celebrating the American Thanksgiving, you too should try and take some additional time for yourself and families over the next few days, work and business demands permitting.

Thank you.

Ginger Dernehl
Administrative Coordinator
Global Government Affairs
Phone# 713-853-7751
Fax# 713-646-8160


Per Tana Jones's e-mail dated June 6, 2000, I should have received a copy of
the counterparty approval list to distribute in her absence.  Please advise
at your earliest convenience if a list was distributed on today (6/12/00).
I will be in training tomorrow.  However, during my lunch hour I will check
my e-mail for a response from you.

Thanks for your attention to this matter.

Samantha M. Boyd
X-39188


One of Travel Agency in the Park's major phone lines has been damaged due to
downtown construction.  The line is currently being repaired with an
estimated down time of approximately 4-6 more hours.  Calls are currently
being routed to 713-853-4801 and 713-345-5164.  We will send additional
notification if this problem persists.  We apologize for any inconvenience.


Do we need any help on the Ontario front from Lay or Skilling.

Given the size of the stakes, I could definately justify their time.


Kristin,

FYI

Vince
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 11/06/2000
10:42 AM ---------------------------

"Frank Qian" <fqian@andrew.cmu.edu> on 11/05/2000 05:10:06 PM
To: <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Thank you!

Dear Mr. Kaminski:

It's a great pleasure to have you visiting us and a great honor to have
dinner with you. I'd like to thank you for your wonderful presentation. It's
the most interesting topic we had so far. This is not just my personal
opinion, all my classmates I talked to agree with me.  I like Enron's style
and culture and I think it played a big role in Enron's success. I look
forward to discuss career opportunities at Enron during your on-campus
interview session.

Regards,

Frank Qian
fqian@andrew.cmu.edu


See attached
Devon GISB

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490

http://edms.livelink.enron.com/ena/livelink.exe/1473898/96014668_17-Mar-1998.p
df?func=doc.Fetch&nodeid=1473898


Bani,

Thanks.

Vince

Bani Arora@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
01/10/2000 06:14 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski@ECT
cc:
Subject: Congratulations!

Hi Vince:

I just received the email announcing your promotion, and I wanted to take
this opportunity to congratulate you.

Best Regards,

Bani


Folks:

Please note -- with a later start time of 9:30 a.m. -- this week's
Staff meeting & conference call, scheduled as follows:

  *  Start Date/Time:   07/19/01 THU 09:30 AM PDT
  *  Conference Host:   SUE MARA
  *  Dial In Number:   (415)782-7849
  *  On-site Location:  Small Conference Room
        101 Calif. Street - 19th Floor

Thanks,

Joseph Alamo
Sr. Admin. Assistant
Government Affairs - the Americas
San Francisco CA
(415) 782-7841


Hi Kara,

I haven't written because I haven't figured out what we learned at the
meeting.  We can discuss next week at our conference.  We are arranging to
have Michael re-tested.  I think it is more of an issue of a difference
between potential and performance.  Michael has been tested in the past, and
tests as extraordinarily bright, but he has had some performance issues which
don't match up.  At least that's how I understand it. He just has some
disconnects which we are working to overcome, but I must admit to not
understanding it all.

I left you a note about Michael possibly missing next week.  After I dropped
him off this am, I had a thought that next week might be when they visit in
1st grade, in which case we probably wouldn't want him to miss that
opportunity.  I think he is excited about 1st grade, so you must be doing a
great job of getting the kids prepared.

Thanks for everything, and see you next week!

Kay

Kara Norris <knorris@ssfrancis.org> on 05/17/2001 03:49:09 PM
To: Kay.Mann@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Re: Michael

Kay,
I'm interested to hear how things went at the meeting.
Michael was the star of the show.  He did a great job!  Glad you both made
it.
-Kara

Kay.Mann@enron.com wrote:

> Hi Kara,
>
> Michael has been seeing a speech/language therapist, and recently she
> raised an issue about Michael's ability to "blend and unblend" sounds in
> words, specifically as it relates to reading readiness.  She had this
> conversation with Neil, so I don't know the details.  We are meeting with
> her today to get more input, but I wanted to mention it to you, just in
> case you had a comment.
>
> I know this is something we can discuss at Michael's conference on May
> 31st, but if you would like to discuss it before hand, I can be reached at
> 713 304 8716 9 (cell), 713 345 -7566 (office - just tell my asst you are
> Michael's teacher), 713 973 6325.
>
> Thanks so much,
>
> Kay


Hi - Thanks for your message last night.  Sorry you're having to work so
late.  Hope it's an exciting deal or deals you're working on at least
(though I know it's hard to "feel the excitement" consistently from morning
to  . . .morning).

Lisa Schiffman
Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue
2727 N. Harwood Street
Dallas, Texas 75201

Tel.: 214-969-5286
Fax: 214-969-5100
Email: lschiffm@jonesday.com

==========
The preceding e-mail message (including any attachments) contains
information that may be confidential, be protected by the attorney-client
or other applicable privileges, or constitute non-public information.  It
is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s).  If you are
not an intended recipient of this message, please notify the sender by
replying to this message and then delete it from your system.  Use,
dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this message by unintended
recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.
==========


Lately, people have been asking about anonymity.  It seems that some might
like to go "incognito" on eSpeak.  But, the purpose of eSpeak is to encourage
open communication, and communication can't be open unless all participants
are open about who they are.  So, we will continue to require you to log in
with your eThink IDs and passwords if you want to ask a question during an
eSpeak event.
There are ways to ask questions anonymously at Enron.  You may send an e-mail
to the Office of the Chairman e-mail address -- this goes to Ken Lay and Jeff
Skilling.  You may also use interoffice mail to send a printed question to
Ken or Jeff anonymously.
These two avenues have always been available.  It bears mentioning, however,
that they have not been used nearly as much since eSpeak hit the scene.  You
might say that open communication has caught on at Enron.


Jeff  -- Sorry.. Joe
----- Forwarded by Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron on 02/22/2001 03:16 PM -----

	Bernadette Hawkins
	02/22/2001 11:23 AM

		 To: Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Scope of FERC Jurisdiction Over State-Owned Utility

FYI
----- Forwarded by Bernadette Hawkins/Corp/Enron on 02/22/2001 12:23 PM -----

	Mary Hain@ECT
	02/22/2001 11:45 AM

		 To: Bernadette Hawkins/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda
Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark
Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Donna Fulton, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Alan
Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, carrrn@bracepatt.com,
dwatkiss@bracepatt.com, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Scope of FERC Jurisdiction Over State-Owned Utility

What about the questions I asked about whether the new entity would comply
with Order No. 2000 (especially if the state has the vertically integrated
utilities operate the system)?  See attached word version of my orginal
E-mail.

02/21/2001 11:03 AM
Bernadette Hawkins@ENRON
Bernadette Hawkins@ENRON
Bernadette Hawkins@ENRON
02/21/2001 11:03 AM
02/21/2001 11:03 AM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda
Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron,
Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Scope of FERC Jurisdiction Over State-Owned Utility

Attached is a memo that addreses the FERC's jurisdiction over the
transfer/sales of utility assets to the state of California.  At a minimum,
FERC must approve the transfer.  Call if you have questions.  Joe
----- Forwarded by Bernadette Hawkins/Corp/Enron on 02/21/2001 01:55 PM -----

	"Tracey Bradley" <tbradley@bracepatt.com>
	02/21/2001 01:10 PM

		 To: <jhartso@enron.com>
		 cc: <jdwatkiss@aol.com>, "Andrea Settanni" <asettanni@bracepatt.com>,
"Ronald Carroll" <rcarroll@bracepatt.com>
		 Subject: Scope of FERC Jurisdiction Over State-Owned Utility

Please see attached memorandum.  We have also attached FERC's orders
addressing LIPA's acquisition of LILCO's transmission assets and LIPA's open
access tariff.  Please call if you have any questions.

 - 0138443.01
 - EC97-45.TXT
 - NJ98-4.TXT


http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/weekend_sites/weekend100900_101300/quotes_101
000.html


Sheila:  Please remind me which Enron company this is for.    Thanks.  Sara

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hemsley, Simon
Sent:	Monday, February 11, 2002 8:40 AM
To:	Glover, Sheila; Shackleton, Sara
Cc:	Seyfried, Bryan
Subject:	Goldmans $1.5m

Hi - any news on whether Goldmans are willing to release the $1.5m in the broker account?

Simon


John,

Naveen's resume.

Vince


HI SANDY! I WILL NEED TO TAKE TUESDAY, 1-4-2000 OFF. MY HUSBAND IS HAVING
SURGERGY ON THAT DAY. IF YOU COULD PLEASE PUT IT ON THE JANUARY CALENDER.
THANK YOU!   JUDY HERNANDEZ


I'm planning to have Rob Walls sign it.  He signed the last one  ( the
original notice of dispute to President de la Rua to start the ICSID clock
for filing) and Rob is also on the Power of Attorney.  The purpose of this
letter is to document all the meetings Guido, Doak and I have had with
various government officials, and to restate in writing all the requests for
relief we have made to the Argentine government prior to filing the suit.  In
a recent BIT case against the Argentine government, the ICSID panel dismissed
the claim because the claimant failed to show that it had made an effort to
state the relief it sought to the government prior to filing the case.  We
have certainly made our requests known to just about every  Argentine
official who would listen, but as a matter of precaution we want to get this
letter on file before filing, so there is no doubt.
Pete, I think Doak is advising Azurix on its BIT claim as well, although I
don't know the extent of his involvement.  But thanks for reminding me about
that.   Recall that ICSID is the only arbitral system in the world that
requires the claimant to fit into various jurisdictional "pigeon holes"
before it will hear the case. Thus it is important that we communicate with
Azurix to avoid either company making contravening jurisdictional statements
(the ICSID jurisdictional rules are not specific enough to avoid various
interpretations).  We estimate our jurisdictional battle could last at least
a year before we get to the merits, but our hope is that we can reach a
settlement in the interim.  I'll keep you updated and will meet with you
before we file the claim to lay out our strategy and answer any questions.
Regards,
Michelle

Peter E Weidler@ENRON
01/04/2001 09:09 AM
To: Michelle Blaine/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Eduardo Quintana/TGS@TGS@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Bruce
Lundstrom/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Richard B
Sanders@ECT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rob Walls/NA/Enron@Enron@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Re:

That is good progress - who are we planning to have sign the letter to
President de la Rua ?   So everyone is aware - Azurix is also preparing to
file for arbitration under the BIT.  Not quite sure what over.  I gave John
Garrison - Michelle's name to cooridinate with.

Pete

Michelle Blaine@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
01/03/2001 07:59 PM
To: Eduardo Quintana/TGS@TGS
cc: Peter E Weidler/NA/Enron@Enron, Bruce
Lundstrom/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Richard B Sanders@ECT, Rob
Walls/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject:

Subject: Re: ICSID/BIT claim

Happy New Year Eduardo!
I've met with Doak and Guido and they have agreed to the caps we discussed on
the projected budget for filing the BIT claim against the Argentine
government. Only those two law firms will be involved from now on.  Doak and
Guido also requested the opportunity to review the numbers again at the end
of 2001, see where we are and adjust the budget as needed on a yearly basis.
I will be involved in that process as well.  I don't see this as being a big
revision or increase, but more of an adjustment depending on the timing and
progress of the  proceedings.  In other words, we may not get nearly as far
in the jurisdictional proceedings as we have projected for 2001, so we'd
adjust the numbers accordingly.  I believe this is a very reasonable approach
and hope that you and Perez Companc will find it acceptable.  Please let me
know if you have any question or concerns that I can answer to expedite this
process.

 We are waiting for your return to send that letter to President de la Rua
because we have made changes and I think your input is crucial.  We plan to
file the Request for Arbitration two weeks following and we are sending you a
draft copy which we'd like to discuss with you and Cristian before filing.

I hope that you are having a wonderful holiday and I wish you and your family
the best for the new year.
Kindest regards,
Michelle


Lin:
Yes, that's right the Confirmation Reply per your earloier request remains as
is.  My fax number is 713-646-3393.
Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)

	"Reece, Lin" <Lin.Reece@SouthernEnergy.Com>
	06/14/2000 04:12 PM

		 To: "'Carol.St.Clair@enron.com'" <Carol.St.Clair@enron.com>
		 cc: "McGough, Scott" <Scott.McGough@SouthernEnergy.Com>
		 Subject: RE: CONFIRMATION COVERSHEET PROCESS LTR.DOC

Thanks so much.  I'm sending your revisions to Scott for review.  The
Confirmation Reply has been totally red lined out of these attachments, but
I am assuming that it remains as we originally designed it.  Please advise
if this is not correct.  If your changes are accepted, I will print a copy
and have Scott McGough execute it.  Please give me your fax number so that I
can fax it to you.  Regards, Lin Reece

-----Original Message-----
From: Carol.St.Clair@enron.com [mailto:Carol.St.Clair@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2000 4:13 PM
To: Lin.Reece@SouthernEnergy.Com
Cc: Larry.Joe.Hunter@enron.com
Subject: RE: CONFIRMATION COVERSHEET PROCESS LTR.DOC

Lin:
Enclosed is a revised letter.

(See attached file: Southern Confirm Letter 2 RED.DOC)(See attached file:
Southern Confirm Letter 2.DOC)

Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)

                    "Reece, Lin"

                    <Lin.Reece@SouthernE        To:
"'Carol.St.Clair@enron.com'" <Carol.St.Clair@enron.com>
                    nergy.Com>                  cc:     "McGough, Scott"
<Scott.McGough@SouthernEnergy.Com>,

"'larry.joe.hunter@enron.com'" <larry.joe.hunter@enron.com>
                    06/14/2000 11:21 AM         Subject:     RE:
CONFIRMATION COVERSHEET PROCESS LTR.DOC

Dear Carol,    We do not want to create an agreement specfic coversheet for
each counterparty.  Is there some way to put language in the body of the
letter agreement to address your concerns.  The procedure we are proposing
is intended to supplement current requirements in the ISDA, not replace
them.  If you feel that additional definition needs to be added to the
confirmation process, shouldn't we put that definition in the letter
agreement rather than on the cover sheet?

Our goal is to be able to expedite our response to counterparty confirms.
In order to do this we need to have the same cover sheet in place for each
counterparty.  Please call me at 678-579-3378 so that we may discuss
possible solutions.  Thanks, Lin

-----Original Message-----
From: Carol.St.Clair@enron.com [mailto:Carol.St.Clair@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2000 11:12 AM
To: Lin.Reece@SouthernEnergy.Com
Cc: Larry.Joe.Hunter@enron.com
Subject: Re: CONFIRMATION COVERSHEET PROCESS LTR.DOC

Lin:
Enclosed are clean and marked  versions of my redo of the reply letter.

(See attached file: Southern Confirm Letter 2 RED.DOC)(See attached file:
Southern Confirm Letter 2.DOC)
Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)

                    "Reece, Lin"

                    <Lin.Reece@SouthernE        To:
"'carol.st.clair@enron.com'" <carol.st.clair@enron.com>
                    nergy.Com>                  cc:

                                                Subject:     CONFIRMATION
COVERSHEET PROCESS LTR.DOC
                    06/13/2000 02:25 PM

 <<CONFIRMATION COVERSHEET PROCESS LTR.DOC>>

Carol,  Please feel free to change the letter agreement.  The coversheet
needs to remain as it is, because we are using this same sheet for all
counterparties.  Thanks, Lin

(See attached file: CONFIRMATION COVERSHEET PROCESS LTR.DOC)


Command: MATCH
Date: 9/17/2001
Time: 1:10:33 PM
TransactionID: 400725
AgencyID: 10416
Recipient: American Red Cross
P.O. Box 37243
Washington, DC 20013
DonorID: 6785
GiftDate: 9/17/2001
GiftAmount: 600
Purpose: September 11th Disaster Relief
Result: Success

If you have not already done so, please send your donation to
American Red Cross
P.O. Box 37243
Washington, DC 20013.
If they do not receive your donation within five days we will have to deny this request.

We have received the above Request.
If everything appears correct there is no need to contact us.
However, if you did not make this request or there is an error in the above information, then email us at: enron@easymatch.com or call us at: 1-866-545-9204.


John,  Based on what Dana and I heard at Stan's Strategic session yesterday,
it appears you have made significant progress in creating a substantial
value opportunity for GPG re: subject.

Following up on Stan's suggestion, Dana, John Millar and I would like to meet
with you at your earliest convenience to see how EOTT can also tap it to this
opportunity.  I look forward to hearing from you.  thanks,  mike


Audrey, this looks good.  Just to clairify, we will keep the Albq. car from Monday until Wed.  Also, could you confirm a full size car for Roswell since we have a fairly long drive to/from Artesia?

Thanks, Kim.

-----Original Message-----
From: Robertson, Audrey
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 11:11 AM
To: Watson, Kimberly
Subject: FW: REVIEW AND APPROVE KIMBERLY WATSON ITINERARY FOR 05 NOV.
TRAVEL

Audrey D. Robertson
Transwestern Pipeline Company
email address:  audrey.robertson@enron.com
(713) 853-5849
(713) 646-2551 Fax

-----Original Message-----
From: Madeleine Cardoso [mailto:madeleine.cardoso@travelpark.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 10:40 AM
To: Robertson, Audrey
Subject: RE: REVIEW AND APPROVE KIMBERLY WATSON ITINERARY FOR 05 NOV.
TRAVEL

                                          AGENT MC/MC BOOKING REF Y6O46F

                                          WATSON/KIMBERLY
                                          EB SUITE 4145K

  ENRON CORP

  DATE:  OCT 25 2001

SERVICE               DATE  FROM           TO             DEPART  ARRIVE

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES  05NOV HOUSTON TX     ALBUQUERQUE NM 540P    645P
CO 149     Q          MON   G.BUSH INTERCO INTL
                            TERMINAL C
                                                          NON STOP
                            RESERVATION CONFIRMED         2:05 DURATION
                  AIRCRAFT: BOEING 737-300

CAR                   05NOV NATIONAL               ALBUQUERQUE NM
                      06NOV CONFIRMATION: 106757263AISLE
                            TELEPHONE: (505) 842-4222
                            FAX: (505) 842-4055
                            INTERMED CAR AUTOMATIC AIR
                            RATE: USD39.00DY-UNL MI
                            RATE QUOTED
                            BASE RATE: *ZL*USD39.00 BR-1DY
                            PICK-UP: ALBUQUERQUE INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
                            DROP-OFF: ALBUQUERQUE INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT

HOTEL                 05NOV HYATT REGENCY ALBUQUERQUE
                      06NOV 330 TIJERAS N.W
                            ALBUQUERQUE, NM 87102
                            UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
                            TELEPHONE: 1-505 8421234
                            FAX: 1-505 7666710
                            CONFIRMATION: HY0016443182
                            REFERENCE: ROMPREF
                            SINGLE ROOM
                            RATE: ENR USD 169.00 PER NIGHT
                            GUARANTEE GIVEN
                            ENRON CORP RQST NONSMKG KING
             TO AVOID BILLING CANCEL BY 6PM DAY OF ARRIVAL.
    LOWER HOTEL RATES MAY BECOME AVAILABLE. PLEASE INQUIRE AT CHK IN

MESA AIRLINES         06NOV ALBUQUERQUE NM ROSWELL NM     800A    850A
YV 406     B          TUE   INTL           INDUSTRIAL
                                                          NON STOP
                            RESERVATION CONFIRMED         0:50 DURATION
                            FLIGHT OPERATED BY ZV AIR MIDWEST
              COCKPIT CREW: ZV  AIR MIDWEST
                CABIN CREW: ZV  AIR MIDWEST
                  AIRCRAFT: BEECHCRAFT 1900/1900C/1900D

CAR                   06NOV AVIS                   ROSWELL NM
                      06NOV CONFIRMATION: 39703800US3
                            TELEPHONE: 505-347-2500
                            FAX: 505-347-2664
                            INTERMED CAR AUTOMATIC AIR
                            RATE: USD59.99DY UNL .00MI 1DY BASE RATE
                            59.99 UNL
                            RATE GUARANTEED
                            PICK-UP: MUNICIPAL APO ROSWELL NM 88203-8427
                            DROP-OFF: MUNICIPAL APO ROSWELL NM 88203-8427

MESA AIRLINES         06NOV ROSWELL NM     ALBUQUERQUE NM 330P    420P
YV 415     B          TUE   INDUSTRIAL     INTL
                                                          NON STOP
                            RESERVATION CONFIRMED         0:50 DURATION
                            FLIGHT OPERATED BY ZV AIR MIDWEST
              COCKPIT CREW: ZV  AIR MIDWEST
                CABIN CREW: ZV  AIR MIDWEST
                  AIRCRAFT: BEECHCRAFT 1900/1900C/1900D

CAR                   06NOV NATIONAL               ALBUQUERQUE NM
                      07NOV CONFIRMATION: 106757280AISLE
                            TELEPHONE: (505) 842-4222
                            FAX: (505) 842-4055
                            INTERMED CAR AUTOMATIC AIR
                            RATE: USD39.00DY-UNL MI
                            RATE QUOTED
                            BASE RATE: *ZL*USD39.00 BR-1DY
                            PICK-UP: ALBUQUERQUE INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
                            DROP-OFF: ALBUQUERQUE INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT

HOTEL                 06NOV HYATT REGENCY ALBUQUERQUE
                      07NOV 330 TIJERAS N.W
                            ALBUQUERQUE, NM 87102
                            UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
                            TELEPHONE: 1-505 8421234
                            FAX: 1-505 7666710
                            CONFIRMATION: HY0016443224
                            REFERENCE: ROMPREF
                            SINGLE ROOM
                            RATE: ENR USD 169.00 PER NIGHT
                            GUARANTEE GIVEN
                            ENRON CORP RQST NONSMKG KING
             TO AVOID BILLING CANCEL BY 6PM DAY OF ARRIVAL.
    LOWER HOTEL RATES MAY BECOME AVAILABLE. PLEASE INQUIRE AT CHK IN

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES  07NOV ALBUQUERQUE NM HOUSTON TX     1130A   230P
CO 150     Q          WED   INTL           G.BUSH INTERCO
                                           TERMINAL C
                                                          NON STOP
                            RESERVATION CONFIRMED         2:00 DURATION
                  AIRCRAFT: BOEING 737-300
                            SEAT 07D NO SMOKING CONFIRMED WATSON/KIMBERLY
LY

RESERVATION NUMBER(S)  CO/UC6W5W  YV/INLEQR

WATSON/KIMBERLY  S0C0179R1110

CO  FREQUENT FLYER COAJ295722
YV  FREQUENT FLYER COAJ295722/NO AGREEMENT
*******************************************
INTL TVLRS: CARRY SOS WALLET CARD W/ENRON ASSISTANCE INFO
CALL SOS MEDICAL EMERGENCY:IN U.S 800 523-6586
CALL SOS MEDICAL EMERGENCY:INTL 215 245-4707 (COLLECT)
*********************************************
AIRFARE ON THE CONTINENTAL PORTION...$156.25 NON-REFUNDABLE.
AIRFARE ON THE MESA AIRLINES PORTION...$314.00.
ALL FARES ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE UNTIL TICKETED/PURCHASED


Just to follow up, did you send a letter to Van Ryn at Koch re the
hydrocarbon and mercury contaminations?  If so, could you please send me a
copy?

 Also, have you been able to come up with any further info on what to do
about the other soil contamination areas?  Do you still want to determine the
full lateral and vertical extent of all?  FYI, I have made further inquiry as
to whether we have any reporting or investigatory duties based upon the
levels in the WZI report.  I believe the numbers you cited in you 5/21 email
may be only part of the story: as you have appropriately noted, in California
it is not only concentration levels that matter; rather, other variables such
as depth to groundwater, proximity to population centers, etc. determine
whether any reporting or remedial (including further investigatory)
obligations arise.  Therefore, I'm checking further to see how these other
variable impact our legal obligations here.  (Again, I think this is very
important inour case because we want to be careful about potenially
jeopardizing our indemnity rights against Koch by performing any Phase
II-type activities where not legally required.

 I expect to have more info on this by the end of the week.  Perhaps we can
chat then?  Thanks. --ETA


at least I made $100 for my services

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lavorato, John
Sent:	Thursday, October 04, 2001 12:27 PM
To:	Arnold, John
Subject:	RE:

THE GREAT THING IS THAT I CAN DEDUCT THIS FROM MY ARNOLD ACCOUNT.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Arnold, John
Sent:	Thursday, October 04, 2001 12:25 PM
To:	Lavorato, John
Subject:

Pull this up and click on hit chart
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/players/profile?statsId=3918#

Your tix are sec 154, row 12, seats 1-4, on the aisle of sec 155
http://astros.mlb.com/NASApp/mlb/hou/ballpark/hou_ballpark_seating.jsp


Sam,
We will be moving to our new office space on Monday December 3rd. We will need you to help move our computers and install our new network equipment. Please direct bill our cost center for all of the expenses incurred for your services. Please contact me if you have any questions.
Thanks
Mark Whitt
Cost Center # 107322
Company # 0413


please print.
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 10/23/2000
03:33 PM ---------------------------

Jim Goughary
10/23/2000 02:51 PM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: EOL Products

Following are my sugestions for the next three EOL gasoline products;

1. 2nd month NYMEX UNL
2. MTBE front month swap, U S Gulf fixed price.
3. Cal 02 UNL gasoline crack spread (this one probably requires VAR increase)
4. WTI swaps that match the timing of our gasoline and HO cracks. This gives
customers the option to convert crack spread positions to fixed price
gasoline and HO swaps through EOL.

Regarding long dated gasoline positions we are long 75 kb per month cal 02
gulf coast gas cracks which probably won't move much in value until
march/April 01. I view this position as very low risk and good profit
potential but this position does tie up VAR. If marketing can sell at $3.80
or better happy to get out of this for now. This is the only long dated
position in my book.


Go ahead and decline. She is in San Fran but another guy I talked to said she wanted to pull prices from a database source. That is nothing to do with the M drive.

John

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	White, Stacey W.
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 2:30 PM
To:	Postlethwaite, John
Subject:	RE: Request Submitted: Access Request for maria.van.houten@enron.com

Can you or someone else ask her why she requested m:\common\power Read/Write?

Stacey

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Postlethwaite, John
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 4:26 PM
To:	White, Stacey W.
Subject:	RE: Request Submitted: Access Request for maria.van.houten@enron.com

I know she is the fundamentals group here, but none of the folders in the path below would be used by her.

John

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	White, Stacey W.
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 2:20 PM
To:	Postlethwaite, John
Subject:	FW: Request Submitted: Access Request for maria.van.houten@enron.com

Why would this person need Read/Write to m:\common\power  I typically only grant access for Write capabilities to Risk.

Stacey

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	ARSystem <ARSystem@mailman.enron.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Friday, October 19, 2001 3:30 PM
To:	White, Stacey W.
Subject:	Request Submitted: Access Request for maria.van.houten@enron.com

You have received this email because you are listed as a data approver. Please click http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000069680&Page=Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000069680
Request Create Date : 10/19/01 3:30:04 PM
Requested For       : maria.van.houten@enron.com
Resource Name       : \\nahoutrd\houston\pwr\common\common\Power - [Read/Write]
Resource Type       : Directory