By STEVE EVERLY - The Kansas City Star
Date: 01/20/01 22:15

As natural gas prices rose in December, traders at the New York Mercantile
Exchange kept one eye on the weather forecast and another on a weekly gas
storage number.

The storage figures showed utilities withdrawing huge amounts of gas, and the
forecast was for frigid weather. Traders put the two together, anticipated a
supply crunch and drove gas prices to record heights.

"Traders do that all the time; they're looking forward," said William Burson,
a trader. "It makes the market for natural gas."

But the market's response perplexed Chris McGill, the American Gas
Association's director of gas supply and transportation. He had compiled the
storage numbers since they were first published in 1994, and in his view the
numbers were being misinterpreted to show a situation far bleaker than
reality.

"It's a little frustrating that they don't take the time to understand what
we are reporting," McGill said.

As consumer outrage builds over high heating bills, the hunt for reasons --
and culprits -- is on. Some within the natural gas industry are pointing
fingers at Wall Street.

Stephen Adik, senior vice president of the Indiana utility NiSource, recently
stepped before an industry conference and blamed the market's speculators for
the rise in gas prices.

"It's my firm belief ... that today's gas prices are being manipulated," Adik
told the trade magazine Public Utilities Fortnightly.

In California, where natural gas spikes have contributed to an electric
utility crisis, six investigations are looking into the power industry.

Closer to home, observers note that utilities and regulators share the blame
for this winter's startling gas bills, having failed to protect their
customers and constituents from such price spikes.

Most utilities, often with the acquiescence of regulators, failed to take
precautions such as fixed-rate contracts and hedging -- a sort of price
insurance -- that could have protected their customers by locking in gas
prices before they soared.

"We're passing on our gas costs, which we have no control over," said Paul
Snider, a spokesman for Missouri Gas Energy.

But critics say the utilities shirked their responsibility to customers.

"There's been a failure of risk management by utilities, and that needs to
change," said Ed Krapels, director of gas power services for Energy Security
Analysis Inc., an energy consulting firm in Wakefield, Mass.

Hot topic

Consumers know one thing for certain: Their heating bills are up sharply. In
many circles, little else is discussed.

The Rev. Vincent Fraser of Glad Tidings Assembly of God in Kansas City is
facing a $1,456 December bill for heating the church -- more than double the
previous December's bill. Church members are suffering from higher bills as
well.

The Sunday collection is down, said Fraser, who might have to forgo part of
his salary. For the first time, the church is unable to meet its financial
pledge to overseas missionaries because the money is going to heating.

"It's the talk of the town here," he said.

A year ago that wasn't a fear. Wholesale gas prices hovered just above $2 per
thousand cubic feet -- a level that producers say didn't make it worthwhile
to drill for gas. Utilities were even cutting the gas prices paid by
customers.

But trouble was brewing. By spring, gas prices were hitting $4 per thousand
cubic feet, just as utilities were beginning to buy gas to put into storage
for winter.

There was a dip in the fall, but then prices rebounded. By early November,
prices were at $5 per thousand cubic feet. The federal Energy Information
Administration was predicting sufficient but tight gas supplies and heating
bills that would be 30 percent to 40 percent higher.

But $10 gas was coming. Below-normal temperatures hit much of the country,
including the Kansas City area, and fears about tight supplies roiled the gas
markets.

"It's all about the weather," said Krapels of Energy Security Analysis.

Wholesale prices exploded to $10 per thousand cubic feet, led by the New York
traders. Natural gas sealed its reputation as the most price-volatile
commodity in the world.

Setting the price

In the 1980s, the federal government took the caps off the wellhead price of
gas, allowing it to float. In 1990, the New York Mercantile began trading
contracts for future delivery of natural gas, and that market soon had
widespread influence over gas prices.

The futures contracts are bought and sold for delivery of natural gas as soon
as next month or as far ahead as three years. Suppliers can lock in sale
prices for the gas they expect to produce. And big gas consumers, from
utilities to companies such as Farmland Industries Inc., can lock in what
they pay for the gas they expect to use.

There are also speculators who trade the futures contracts with no intention
of actually buying or selling the gas -- and often with little real knowledge
of natural gas.

But if they get on the right side of a price trend, traders don't need to
know much about gas -- or whatever commodity they're trading. Like all
futures, the gas contracts are purchased on credit. That leverage adds to
their volatility and to the traders' ability to make or lose a lot of money
in a short time.

As December began, the price of natural gas on the futures market was less
than $7 per thousand cubic feet. By the end of the month it was nearly $10.
Much of the spark for the rally came from the American Gas Association's
weekly storage numbers.

Utilities buy ahead and store as much as 50 percent of the gas they expect to
need in the winter.

Going into the winter, the storage levels were about 5 percent less than
average, in part because some utilities were holding off on purchasing, in
hopes that the summer's unusually high $4 to $5 prices would drop.

Still, the American Gas Association offered assurances that supplies would be
sufficient. But when below-normal temperatures arrived in November, the
concerns increased among traders that supplies could be insufficient.

Then the American Gas Association reported the lowest year-end storage
numbers since they were first published in 1994. Still, said the
association's McGill, there was sufficient gas in storage.

But some utility executives didn't share that view. William Eliason, vice
president of Kansas Gas Service, said that if December's cold snap had
continued into January, there could have been a real problem meeting demand.

"I was getting worried," he said.

Then suddenly the market turned when January's weather turned warmer.
Wednesday's storage numbers were better than expected, and futures prices
dropped more than $1 per thousand cubic feet.

Just passing through

Some utilities said there was little else to do about the price increase but
pass their fuel costs on to customers.

Among area utilities, Kansas Gas Service increased its customers' cost-of-gas
charge earlier this month to $8.68 per thousand cubic feet. And Missouri Gas
Energy has requested an increase to $9.81, to begin Wednesday.

Sheila Lumpe, chairwoman of the Missouri Public Service Commission, said last
month that because utilities passed along their wholesale costs, little could
be done besides urging consumers to join a level-payment plan and to conserve
energy.

Kansas Gas Service had a small hedging program in place, which is expected to
save an average customer about $25 this winter.

Missouri Gas Energy has no hedging program. It waited until fall to seek an
extension of the program and then decided to pass when regulators would not
guarantee that it could recover its hedging costs.

Now utilities are being asked to justify the decisions that have left
customers with such high gas bills. And regulators are being asked whether
they should abandon the practice of letting utilities pass along their fuel
costs.

On Friday, Doug Micheel, senior counsel of the Missouri Office of the Public
Counsel, said his office would ask the Missouri Public Service Commission to
perform an emergency audit of Missouri Gas Energy's gas purchasing practices.

"Consumers are taking all the risk," Micheel said. "It's time to consider
some changes."

To reach Steve Everly, call (816) 234-4455 or send e-mail to
severly@kcstar.com.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
All content , 2001 The Kansas City Star


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 03/29/2000 08:03
AM ---------------------------

dkinney@columbiaenergygroup.com on 03/29/2000 07:35:08 AM
To: " - *Chris.Germany@enron.com" <Chris.Germany@enron.com>
cc: " - *Dalphon, Charles" <cdalpho@columbiaenergygroup.com>
Subject: Update of April 00 FOM reqs

Chris--You should be able to open this and print out the table.  Click on the
Button with a 2 if you want the summary version.

Doug Kinney
Ph:  703-561-6339
Fax:  703-561-7317

 - Apr00_FOMupdat02.xls


If you aren't able to view this email please cut and paste this url into your browser: http://www.herters.com/email/hemail1221.html
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]

If you received this e-mail in error or would like to make changes, click  http://www.herters.com/email/listindex.html  to make changes or remove your subscription.


Jo,

	At Pinnacle Terry  there is only one shipper - Tristar Gas Marketing for 800 dth

	At Elpaso Keystone as of today Reliant is the only shipper for 14,000 dth.

	Is that the info you are looking for?  Thanks. Lynn


Alice Wright
Enron Wholesale Services
Power Trading - Legal - EB3809A
713-853-5438
713-646-3491 (fax)
alice.wright@enron.com

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Noske, Linda
Sent:	Tuesday, July 17, 2001 1:01 PM
To:	Wright, Alice
Subject:	FERC RTO Orders

---------------------- Forwarded by Linda J Noske/HOU/ECT on 07/17/2001 01:01 PM ---------------------------

 	  From:  Christi L Nicolay                           07/13/2001 04:51 PM

To:	Linda J Noske/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject:	FERC RTO Orders

Please make 3 copies of each order

---------------------- Forwarded by Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT on 07/13/2001 04:51 PM ---------------------------
From:	Linda L Lawrence/ENRON@enronXgate on 07/13/2001 10:05 AM
To:	Elizabeth Linnell/NA/Enron@Enron, Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Scott/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:

Subject:	FERC RTO Orders

Copies of RTO FERC orders issued July 12, 2000 in the following proceedings:

PJM (RT0-98), NYISO(RT01-95), NEISO(RT01-86), SPP(RT01-34), SOCO(RT01-77) ALLIANCE(RT01-88), CP&L(RT01-74) and Settlement Conference(RT01-100):

<Embedded Picture (Device Independent Bitmap)>


Greetings:
Unlucky you.  It's me again, calling about setting up a meeting with Ms Doll.  Any word?  Greatly appreciate your efforts.

Best,
Jeff

-----Original Message-----
From: Ryall, Jean
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 11:46 PM
To: Steffes, James D.
Cc: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: RE: Do you know Laura Doll?

Yes, I have known her for quite some time.  She is the one who recommended me to Korn Ferry for the job that I have at Enron.  I will be happy to make the introduction.  Shall I make arrangements for a meeting in Pebble Beach???

I'll give her a call when you say the word...Jean

-----Original Message-----
From: Steffes, James D.
Sent: Sun 10/7/2001 9:48 AM
To: Ryall, Jean
Cc: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: Do you know Laura Doll?

Jean --

Laura Doll has been appointed head of the CA Power Authority.  Do you know her?  It would be good to have an introduction for Jeff Dasovich.

Jim


I agree.  I suggest the following.  Joe, we need you to go give a pitch to
Massey's assistats about what is going on.  Next Jerry Halvorsen has
scheduled a lunch with Massey in two weeks.  He has invited me to attend.
What do you think?

Steven J Kean
04/26/2001 03:09 PM
To: Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Shelley Corman/Enron@EnronXGate
cc: Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Ray
Alvarez/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tom Briggs/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Some Background on California Gas Price Spikes--The Other Side of
the Story

We need to communicate with Massey before he gets completely carried away
blaming the interstate pipeline business for gas price spikes.  We need to
get him the information regarding Cal LDCs failure to fill storage and their
opposition to additional pipeline construction in the state.  Shelley --
could you forward copies of the LDC filings to the group.  Should Joe or I
(or both) try to see massey when I am in town next week?
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 04/26/2001
02:07 PM ---------------------------
From: Jeff Dasovich on 04/24/2001 06:57 PM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, skean@enron.com, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Leslie
Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rob
Bradley/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Janel Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Karen
Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enro@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Some Background on California Gas Price Spikes--The Other Side of
the Story

Last week, I distributed a presentation that the Brattle Group gave before
the California Inquisition (i.e., legislative gas oversight committee looking
into the gas price spikes at the Cal border).

The Brattle Group is a consulting firm that Edison has long used to beat up
on SoCalGas (recall that Edison used to be a big gas customer when it owned
power plants).  Edison "arranged" for the Brattle Group to be the star
witness at the Cal Leg gas hearing.  Their job was to set up El Paso and
Dynegy for the hit at hearings that took place the following day.  Their
message was simple (and simplistic):

El Paso and Dynegy have market power.
They have used the market power to drive up basis and thus the price of gas
at the border (to "obscene" levels).
That, in turn, has driven up electricity prices.

Ken Lay is giving a gas talk tomorrow, and Rob Bradley asked that I provide
the alternative view to the Edison/Brattle rant, in the event that he gets
any questions on the topic.  It's attached.  Apologies, it's quick and dirty,
but it provides the basics.

Obviously no need for us to defend El Paso or Dynegy, but might be useful to
offer a more rationale explanation than the one that the California
Legislature is peddling.

Finally, we were also fingered somewhat as culprits at the hearing (the
California PUC FERC lawyer claimed that ENA and TW colluded to drive up basis
when ENA controlled a portion of  the capacity), but the overriding goal of
the hearing was to go after EP and Dynegy.

Best,
Jeff


Another deal for your review and comments.

 Jim

---------------------- Forwarded by James E Keller/HOU/EES on 05/21/2001
09:06 AM ---------------------------

	Enron Energy Services

	From:  Andrew Wu                           05/20/2001 03:38 PM
	Phone No: 713 853-0504

To: Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, George Waidelich/SFO/EES@EES, Lamar
Frazier/HOU/EES@EES
cc: James E Keller/HOU/EES@EES, Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Robert C
Williams/Enron@EnronXGate
Subject: Sutter Health

Attached to this email pls find my revised Sutter document, incorporating our
thoughts and comments to date.  Pls advise with comments or questions.  Jim
Keller, will you be the one taking care of coordinating legal review with
ENA, or is it someone else?

Thanks,

AW


not yet.  mhc

	Pam Butler@ENRON
	05/16/2000 02:12 PM

		 To: Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: EIP

Any documents available from V&E for my review yet? Thanks.

Pam


Bob:
Have you followed up with this company?  If not, please do and let us know
(in Lotus Notes).  Thanks.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


Mark (and Mark) are there any concerns with Enron Direct Canada (EDC) (the
mass markets retail affiliate, that is soon to be a subsidiary of EES) as
opposed to Enron Canada (as wholesale affiliate of ENA) entering into
financial transactions?  To date EDC has been entering into physical
transactions only for gas and power under forms that have been developed
based upon our wholesale physical contracts, Enron Direct UK's form, and
compliance with the local regulatory requirements for retailers.  If EDC was
to enter into financial transactions, they would tend to be papered under
omnibus financial GTCs with EDC (as ISDAs would likely not be marketable).
Of course credit would need to be obtained in advance, and the transactions
are not booked until the counterparty executes the paper.  Please let me know.

Peter.


Today, Enron hosted a conference call to give investors a current overview of the company. Here's an update of what we discussed during the call.

We told investors that we're doing everything we can to protect their interests and to regain their confidence. Our focus remains on our credit quality, balance sheet and liquidity, which are essential for our continued success and expansion of our wholesale businesses.

It took more than a few weeks to get where we are today. Here's a snapshot of significant events that led to our current situation:

-- In hindsight, we definitely made some very bad investments in our non-core businesses over the past several years. Those include investments in Azurix, India and Brazil. They have performed far worse that we could have ever imagined when we made these investments;

-- Because of these bad investments, we've become over-leveraged as a company. The negative impact of those investments was exacerbated through the extensive use of debt capital both on and off our balance sheet;

-- We also entered into related party transactions that led to a loss of investor confidence, which has been very damaging;

-- We've been criticized for our lack of transparency and our hard-to-understand financial and operating disclosures; and

-- On top of it all, we discovered errors in our financial statements, as discussed in our 8-K filing last week, that required a restatement of previously reported earnings.

We've taken a new look at our businesses and have separated them into three areas: core businesses, non-core businesses, and businesses under review.

Core Businesses

Our core businesses remain strong and consistent sources of significant earnings and cash flows for the company. They're our competitive advantage. These include:

-- Natural gas pipeline businesses;

-- Gas and power businesses in North America and Europe;

-- Retail businesses in North America and Europe; and

-- Coal businesses in North America and Europe.

The events of the past few weeks have had a temporary negative impact on our projected fourth quarter profitability. It's too early to tell at this time what impact this might have on our operating results. We are considering these actions now so that we can quickly return to normal business in 2002.

I also remain optimistic that the actions we've taken over the past couple of weeks have addressed our customer and counterparty credit and liquidity concerns. According to our business unit leaders, we have definitely seen improvement in our counterparty relationships.

Non-Core Businesses

Our non-core businesses include our global assets group and our broadband division. We have invested more than $8 billion in these businesses, and the return from them has been dismal.

We have an aggressive program in place to exit these businesses and expect that the sale of these businesses will generate billions of dollars in cash that we can use to repay debt and reinvest in our core businesses. We already have more than $800 million in assets contracted for sale this year. They include CEG Rio, a gas LDC in Brazil; EcoElectrica, a power plant and LNG receiving terminal in Puerto Rico; and asset sales of offshore oil and gas properties in India. The approximately $2.9 billion Portland General sale is also on target to close in late 2002 pending regulatory approvals.

Businesses Under Review

These businesses are comprised of those operations outside our power and gas wholesale businesses and include global and industrial markets. While several of these businesses have very strong future prospects, we need to determine if their capital requirements and near-term growth prospects are sufficient enough in terms of earnings and cash generation.

Reviewing our businesses this way will help determine where we need to make reductions to our work force. More information will follow as soon as it becomes available.

Credit Rating/10-Q Filing

We continue to meet regularly with credit rating agencies and believe that our liquidity enhancements and scheduled asset sales will strengthen our balance sheet and maintain our investment grade credit rating. Our current credit ratings by the three major rating agencies are as follows:

-- Moody's at Baa3       "Under Review for Further Downgrade"

-- Fitch at BBB-             "Evolving Status"

-- S&P at BBB-              "CreditWatch Negative"

We also discussed our existing financial vehicles, including Osprey, Marlin and Yosemite, in further detail. We told investors that we will file our 10-Q five days late due to our current activities. It will be filed on Nov. 19.

We will continue to have updates with investors over the coming weeks as well as our frequent updates with you. The full transcript of our conference call will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in the next few days. It will also be posted on our web site at www.enron.com/corp/investors under "SEC Filings."

In connection with the proposed transactions, Dynegy and Enron will file a joint proxy statement/prospectus with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Investors and security holders are urged to carefully read the joint proxy statement/prospectus regarding the proposed transactions when it becomes available, because it will contain important information. Investors and security holders may obtain a free copy of the joint proxy statement/prospectus (when it is available) and other documents containing information about Dynegy and Enron, without charge, at the SEC's web site at www.sec.gov. Copies of the joint proxy statement/prospectus and the SEC filings that will be incorporated by reference in the joint proxy statement/prospectus may also be obtained for free by directing a request to either: Investor Relations, Dynegy Inc., 1000 Louisiana, Suite 5800, Houston, TX 77002, Phone: (713) 507-6466, Fax: (713) 767-6652; or Investor Relations, Enron Corp., Enron Building, 1400 Smith Street, Houston, TX 77002, Phone: (713) 853-3956, Fax: (713) 646-3302.

In addition, the identity of the persons who, under SEC rules, may be considered "participants in the solicitation" of Dynegy and Enron shareholders in connection with the proposed transactions, and any description of their direct or indirect interests, by security holdings or otherwise, are available in an SEC filing under Schedule 14A made by each of Dynegy and Enron.


Kate-
Mark Fischer EOL trade failed, Transcanada Power, division... logged in under
the wrong name.  I manually entered EOL transaction  766105, the enpower deal
number is 496130.01.  I will inform the Cp of this.  Thanks
Stephanie


Attached is a revised Credit Watch listing as of 3/26/01.
If there are any personnel in your group that were not included in this
distribution, please insure that they receive a copy of this report.
To add additional people to this distribution, or if this report has been
sent to you in error, please contact Veronica Espinoza at x6-6002.
For other questions, please contact Bill Bradford at x3-3831, Russell Diamond
at x5-7095, or Brant Reves at x3-9897.


Dear Market Participants,

The NYISO Market Monitoring and Performance Unit is providing
the following attachments regarding information on the development
and implementation of reference prices in the AMP:

   Sample AMP Letter
   AMP Data Template User Manual
   AMP Cost Worksheet

(See attached file: AMP_genletter.PDF)(See attached file:
AMP_Data_Template_User_Manual.doc)

(See attached file: AMP_COST_WORKSHEET.xls)

Regards,

Leigh Bullock
NYISO Market Services
(518)356-7503

 - AMP_genletter.PDF
 - AMP_Data_Template_User_Manual.doc
 - AMP_COST_WORKSHEET.xls


The $.10 rate should be correct.

D

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Megan Parker @ ENRON                           03/08/2001 12:33 PM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Tenaska IV Transport 10/00

That's great.  What about deal 452475?  We have $0.10 and we are being billed
$0.11 for meter 25000200 on contract 1856.  Also, I faxed the Oct 2000 TXU
invoices to Trisha Hughes so she can look into the Dec 2000 and forward
problem.

Megan


Would consider it if the Republicans were not so wrong on the social issues I
care about (personally).

The DNC is on its way to causing irreparable harm with the energy industry.
I think they have grossly over estimated the political gain in slamming the
oil and gas industry.  We will see.

I think Steve's meeting with Rep. Adam Smith and your meeting with the DLC
are evident in the New Dem approach.   They are only my last hope.

	Richard Shapiro
	05/18/2001 11:41 AM

		 To: Chris Long/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: New Democrat energy policy

Are you a registered republican yet?

Chris Long
05/18/2001 09:28 AM
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda
Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tom Briggs/NA/Enron@Enron, John
Shelk/NA/Enron@Enron, Stephen D Burns/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Carin
Nersesian/NA/Enron@Enron, Larry Decker/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: New Democrat energy policy

Please see the attached New Democrat Coalition Energy Policy outline.  While
not a comprehensive document, it does NOT call for price caps.  The New Dem
plan does call for the development of national interconnection, as well as a
creation of an Energy Reliability Organization to help facilitate the role of
RTOs.

This is in stark comparison to the DNC and Democratic Policy Committees
approach.

----- Forwarded by Chris Long/Corp/Enron on 05/18/2001 10:19 AM -----

	"Weise, Ali" <Ali.Weise@mail.house.gov>
	05/18/2001 09:58 AM

		 To: clong@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: energy policy

 <<energy policy.wpd>>
Alixandria Weise
Chief of Staff
Congressman Adam Smith
202-225-8901
202-225-5893 (fax)
www.house.gov/adamsmith

 - energy policy.wpd


The attached schedule covers both Friday and Saturday, June 7-8.  Associated text files have been posted to Sparky.

Michael R. Frazier
Manager, Load Forecasting
Enron Energy Services
Office: 713-345-3200
Pager: 877-926-0615
P-mail: 8779260615@skytel.com


I'll check the surf report and maybe go out earlier, and then meet up with
y'all. OR you could come towards the end of my session, and meet me. (We
need to take two cars anyway, because of C's bass, and other issues, I'm
sure.) Or, you could come out for a surf there, Jeffro, while the chickies
cool their heels on the beach (or at the local bar...). Bolinas is an easy
wave, and a great place to surf. But, it takes a south, which might not be
happenin'. We'll just have to wait and see.

>From: Cameron Sellers <cameron@perfect.com>
>To: "'Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com'" <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>,
>scottwl@hotmail.com
>Subject: RE: P. Dub-yah's Birthday
>Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 12:06:05 -0800
>
>Works for me.
>
>
>Cameron Sellers
>Vice President, Business Development
>PERFECT
>1860 Embarcadero Road - Suite 210
>Palo Alto, CA 94303
>cameron@perfect.com
>650.798.3366 (direct dial)
>650.269.3366 (cell)
>650.858.1095 (fax)
>
>  -----Original Message-----
>From:  Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2000 10:31 AM
>To: cameron@perfect.com; scottwl@hotmail.com
>Subject: P. Dub-yah's Birthday
>
>Dub and I are going to go to Stinson/Bolinas to seela the deal on Saturday
>morning/afternoon prior to going to Napa for Nancy's Bday on Sat night.
>Would love to have you two join, but worry not if you've got conflicts.
>
>Best,
>Jeff

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.


love it

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 1:24 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

I figured you would like it!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 1:23 PM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

i know i love it

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 1:23 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:

Have you seen me today?  I'm blonde again!!!


Jim, I have forwarded your binder to David Oxley to set up a meeting for the
wholesale group to discuss appropriate homes for your people.  It has taken a
little longer than expected to get people together but we are making
progress.  It may be helpful for you to identify, like Abe, where these folks
would like to go if they had their druthers.

It may be worthwhile for us to have a quick phone call to discuss.

Regards
Delainey


plz call when you can.  re: core/noncore.  thx, jeff  415.782.7822


see you cannot be trusted.  and how is that looking out for your best interests?  should you change your thinking sir?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 10:13 AM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

youre right, im sorry, i think i was looking out for me

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 10:10 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

why would you want to do that?  how is that looking out for me?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 10:10 AM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

i think so

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 10:09 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

are you trying to get me in trouble charlie brown?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 10:08 AM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

really?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 10:07 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

you find me the explanation to all and i will find the day!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 10:06 AM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

i am serious, you can find one day

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 9:59 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

are you being serious?  i am not my own boss you forget.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 9:58 AM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

you tell me, my schedule is pretty open

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 9:57 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

ok when?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 9:54 AM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

cant we just go for one day

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 9:51 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:

they are lighting the tree on wednesday in ny!  we are going to miss it.


Firms want off grid
Companies wish to deal directly with utilities and avoid helping state foot
the bill.
June 15, 2001
By KATE BERRY
The Orange County Register
California's business community is locked in a battle with energy regulators
and lawmakers about how deregulation will ultimately pan out - and whether
companies will be stuck paying most of the tab for the state's electricity
crisis.
Business groups want to continue down the road toward deregulation. They are
lobbying politicians to pass legislation that would let companies buy
electricity directly from power suppliers, bypassing the state's regulated
utilities.
"In our hearts, we still believe we can make this a competitive market and
get some cost savings,'' said Bill Dombrowski, president of the California
Retailers Association, which represents 9,000 stores in the state, including
Home Depot, Target and Albertson's.
But Gov. Gray Davis' foray into long-term contracts, agreeing to pay $43
billion over 10 to 20 years for power, could squash that ambition.
The state's Public Utilities Commission delayed a proposal June 7 to restrict
companies from signing so-called "direct access" contracts with power
providers. Regulators are expected to rule on the proposal next week.
The debate over direct access is at the heart of a complicated attempt to
solve California's costly power crisis.
It will determine whether businesses, with residential customers, pay for the
bulk of the state's future energy purchases. It also could determine whether
Southern California Edison, the state's cash-strapped No. 2 utility, will
avoid bankruptcy - and whether deregulation will survive in any form.
"The governor got it exactly wrong,'' said Peter Navarro, an economics
professor at the University of California, Irvine, who is running for the San
Diego City Council. "The long-term contract strategy is a de facto
re-regulation of the market because it eliminates the ability of industrial
customers to bargain for a lower price.''
Direct access was a key component of the 1996 deregulation law, designed to
break the monopoly of California's utilities. Under this concept, all
customers could directly access an energy provider other than their regulated
utility - just as they pick a long-distance phone company.
Currently, 11,000 businesses and government entities have direct access, as
well as about 77,000 residential customers - but some energy service
providers, such as Enron Corp., are dropping their residential customers.
Direct access is at the center of the latest Edison bailout plan, sponsored
by Assembly Speaker Pro Tem Fred Keeley, D-Boulder Creek. Under the plan, the
3,600 largest businesses would agree to pay $3.1 billion of Edison's debts
over 15 years. In exchange, businesses would be allowed to secure their own
power contracts by 2003.
But energy regulators may not let companies off the hook at such a bargain
price.
David Gamson, an energy adviser to PUC Commissioner Geoffrey F. Brown, said
regulators are concerned that if businesses flee the system, the state will
be stuck with too much electricity under long-term electricity contracts
through 2021. That would mean residential ratepayers would be stuck paying
the bulk of the $43 billion in future power costs.
Complicating the issue is Wall Street. The state's bankers, led by J.P.
Morgan, are nervous about selling as much as $13.4 billion in planned state
bonds if businesses - now the largest ratepayers in the state after
governments - find a way out of the system. The bonds are meant to repay the
state for $8.2 billion in power-buying costs so far this year and to cover
some future costs.
Business and residential electricity customers would repay the bonds through
a surcharge on their utility bills. If businesses are allowed to sign on with
outside energy providers, that revenue stream would be in jeopardy.
"We have companies now that want to get below-cost power from the state, but
when the market turns, they want to leave,'' said Lawrence Lingbloom, chief
policy adviser on energy to Sen. Debra Bowen, D-Marina del Rey. "Remaining
customers would be left with those costs, and it would create a death spiral
for the revenue stream.''
Consumer groups oppose direct access because it would allow businesses to
avoid paying most of the costs of the energy crisis.
"Direct access is a policy that should be dead because it's a key adjunct to
deregulation,'' said Doug Heller of the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer
Rights in Santa Monica. "But right now, it's a policy that's driving all the
deals.''
Even as regulators and consumer groups try to snuff out direct access,
business groups are lobbying to save it - with the help of key legislators.
Two bills, one sponsored by Bowen, who heads the Senate energy committee, and
a second by Assemblyman Dave Kelley, R-Hemet, would rescind language in
previous legislation that gave the Public Utilities Commission authority to
block direct access.
Both proposals would require businesses to pay the state an "exit fee.''
Those fees haven't yet been determined, but they would include a surcharge or
a complicated calculation in which businesses would pay a percentage of
future energy purchases.
Companies say they don't want to pay.
"Direct access has allowed businesses to enter fixed- price contracts to get
stable rates,'' said Shawn Covell, senior manager for governmental affairs at
Qualcomm Inc. in San Diego. "It's really unfair when you have businesses that
have taken their time to protect themselves, to punish them.''
Qualcomm, which makes telecommunications equipment, saw its energy bills
double to $6 million last year. The company signed a contract with an energy
service provider, Strategic Energy in Carlsbad, and capped its rates.
Otherwise, Covell said, its electricity costs would have doubled again this
year.
Sweetwater Union High School District in Chula Vista is a direct-access
customer. The district, with 35,000 students, spends about $2 million a year
on energy, said Jim Clark, its energy manager. His district won a "watchdog
award'' for efficiency from the San Diego County Taxpayers' Association
because it locked in lower rates.
When Gov. Gray Davis announced in January that the state would begin signing
long-term contracts, Clark extended the district's contract through 2006 at
11 cents per kilowatt-hour - enabling it to save $1 million a year, he said.
"As soon as Davis made the announcement, we knew the market was going to
move,'' he said. "The market only changes when people buy. When the state of
California steps to the plate, the price goes to the moon.''
Davis has maintained that the long-term contracts between the state and power
suppliers helped bring down high spot market prices in recent weeks by
removing demand from that market.
But Clark and others who want to go the direct-access route fear the
government will force businesses to pay for all the costs of the energy
crisis, including rate increases of 38 percent to 49 percent, plus surcharges
to pay off $13.4 billion in forthcoming state bonds.
"Businesses will be required to pay for the mistakes that the governor and
the Legislature have made,'' he said. "Who else is going to pay for it?
Ultimately, it will fall on the heads of all consumers.''
Register staff writer Hanh Kim Quach contributed to this report.


---------------------- Forwarded by Don Miller/HOU/ECT on 10/25/2000 10:49 AM
---------------------------
From: Stuart Zisman on 10/25/2000 10:41 AM
To: Don Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

Latest following my conversation with Sara Galley of A&K

Stuart


Attached is the schedulers' contact information.  Note:  The schedulers'
spreadsheets are located in the same root directory.  The directory is as
follows:

M:\Electric\Schedule...

See the spreadsheet for specifications on specific path for certain regions.


_________________________________________________________________

WEEKEND SYSTEMS AVAILABILITY

FOR

1/4/2002 5:00:00 PM through 1/7/2002 12:00:00 AM
_________________________________________________________________
SCHEDULED SYSTEM OUTAGES:

ARDMORE DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS:

Impact: Corp
Time: Sat 1/5/2002 2:00:00 PM CT thru Sat 1/5/2002 3:00:00 PM CT
Sat 1/5/2002 12:00:00 PM PT thru Sat 1/5/2002 1:00:00 PM PT
Sat 1/5/2002 8:00:00 PM London thru Sat 1/5/2002 9:00:00 PM London
Outage: SysAdmiral Fault Tolerance Split for Netco/Estate
Environments Impacted: The outage the sysAdmiral Application will be brief and should not directly affect any applications.
Purpose: We are Splitting the sysAdmiral Fault Tolerance Databases and Master Services on NAHOU-BPMS01P and NAHOU-BPMSFT01P. NAHOU-BPMS01P Database/Master will be used for Estate Scheduling needs and NAHOU-BPMSFT01P will be used for Netco Scheduling Needs. After the environments are split their will be no more replication between the two servers or Fault Tolerance.
Backout: ReEnable Fault Tolernace.
Contact(s): Brennan, Ryan 713-853-4545
Lindsay, Brian 713-853-6225
Impact: Corp
Time: Sat 1/5/2002 9:00:00 AM CT thru Sat 1/5/2002 9:30:00 AM CT
Sat 1/5/2002 7:00:00 AM PT thru Sat 1/5/2002 7:30:00 AM PT
Sat 1/5/2002 3:00:00 PM London thru Sat 1/5/2002 3:30:00 PM London
Outage: Hardware swap for DFS NAHOU
Environments Impacted: All
Purpose: Existing DFS cluster NAHOU hardware has been marked for Netco Deployment. Therefore it is necessary to de-commission NAHOU and bring up another instance of NAHOU dfs for estate.
Backout: Revert DFS cluster back to NAHOU.
Contact(s): Cheng, John 7138531672
McNair, Darren 7138537955

AZURIX: No Scheduled Outages.

EB34 DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

EDI:  No Scheduled Outages

EES: No Scheduled Outages

ENRON CENTER SOUTH DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages

ENRON NORTH AMERICAN LANS:  No Scheduled Outages

FIELD SERVICES:  No Scheduled Outages.

INTERNET: No Scheduled Outages.

MESSAGING: No Scheduled Outages.

MARKET DATA: No Scheduled Outages.

NT: No Scheduled Outages.

OS/2:  No Scheduled Outages.

OTHER SYSTEMS: No Scheduled Outages.

SITARA:  No Scheduled Outages.

SUN/OSS SYSTEM: No Scheduled Outages.

TELEPHONY: No Scheduled Outages

TERMINAL SERVER:  No Scheduled Outages.

UNIFY:  No Scheduled Outages.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
								FOR ASSISTANCE

(713) 853-1411   Enron Resolution Center

Specific Help:
Information Risk Management			(713) 853-5536
SAP/ISC                                                                               (713) 345-4727
Unify On-Call 					(713) 284-3757  [Pager]
Sitara On-Call					(713) 288-0101  [Pager]
RUS/GOPS/GeoTools/APRS			(713) 639-9726  [Pager]
OSS/UA4/TARP				(713) 285-3165  [Pager]
CPR						(713) 284-4175  [Pager]
EDI Support 					(713) 327-3893  [Pager]
EES Help Desk					(713)853-9797 OR (888)853-9797
TDS -Trader Decision Support On-Call                    (713) 327-6032 [Pager]


TECO TAP              120.000/ HPL GAS DAILY

LS HPL KATY            30.000/ ENRON


Steve, please look at the link below.  Jeff wants to know if we should get in
touch with this group to explain our side.  Thanks, SRS

http://boards.fool.com/Message.asp?mid=14354856


Forwarded as discussed.  Doug Gilbert Smith has asked that your group draft a complaint to the PUCT regarding this misinterpretation of the Protocols by the ERCOT ISO, which effectively requires a generator called on for the OOMC ancillary service to run its plant, and sidesteps the obligation to pay an OOME price component when the plant's output is utilized by ERCOT.  The OOMC compensation is currently negligible (and recovery of actual costs under Protocols Sec. 6.8.2.1(6) may take a long time), and the OOME compensation has various problems as well: (1) the more ERCOT calls on a plant for OOME, the the lesser the OOME price paid (Protocols Sec. 6.8.2.2 -- Heat Rate value decreases), and (2) plants directed to provide, say, 135MWs of OOMC/OOME, are not allowed to generate above 135 MWs in an interval (thus running the plant economically at a lower heat rate) to sell the excess in the marketplace. The Frontera plant, a customer of EPMI acting as QSE, is located such that ERCOT is and will be consistently telling the plant via its QSE to provide OOMC -- to produce energy going north on a line in South Texas. Doug says we should advocate to the PUC that plants in such a position should be Reliability Must Run ("RMR") and be paid at an adequate premium for their support of the system' reliability.

I noted to you as well that this is likely to be a dispute with ERCOT over the interpretation of the Protocols, conducted under Protocols Section 20, and we would appreciate any reg. group efforts toward preparation for iinitiating such dispute.  Frontera has indicated they will not provide OOMC tomorrow even if ERCOT tells us, their QSE that it should be dispatched. Thus we are caught in the middle.  The legitimate bases for not complying with an ERCOT dispatch instruction are stated in Protocols Section 5.4.4(2): "threat to safety, risk of bodily harm or damage to the equipment, or otherwise is not in compliance with these Protocols".  Though the Protocols Sections 1-22 seem to recognize as to other capacity- oriented ancillary service products that it is 'generating capacity available but not energy delivered to the grid', I have not seen this made clear as to OOMC.  The Operating Guides' definition of OOMC, page 21 seems to recognize this however, and Section 2B of the ERCOT Market Guide, p. 8 (Feb 22, 2001) recognizes the distinction between capacity and generated energy clearly in support of the position stated by John Forney below.

Sorry for the long e-mail -- I was trying to provide a statting point for your group.
  -----Original Message-----
From: 	Forney, John M.
Sent:	Wednesday, November 14, 2001 12:27 PM
To:	Portz, David; Gilbert-smith, Doug
Subject:	Ercot Questions

David,
I need some help with an Ercot protocol interpretation:

Frontera has been issued  OOMC requests by the ISO on numerous occasions, starting September 14th.    This Out of Merit request is issued if no mkt bids exist to solve congestion, whether local or zonal.
The OOMC, as I understand it,  reserves capacity for Ercot and the premium is predetermined based on a formula mentioned in the protocols.   The formula is based on the replacement reserve clearing price,  which currently is zero.   This is because the replacement reserve market is non-existent.  An announcement on how the OOMC capacity payments will be calculated is due out this week,  per Mark Patterson.

The second component of this option is OOME.    This is a request for actual energy related to the OOMC option.   The strike price is calculated from a preset heat rate multiplied by the HSC daily price, as mentioned in the protocols.  So the OOMC/OOME ws designed to work like the ancillary services with a capacity award and an energy component.  I think that this is the spirit of the OOM's, as mentioned in Section 6 of the Protocols.

Here is the problem:
the head of Ercot Market Operations,  John Adams,  interprets the protocols to mean that OOMC requries the plant to be generating.     When Ercot dispatchers had issued an OOMC,  they quickly followed up to ask us why we were not generating into the grid.
We explained to them, on numerous occasions,  that we dont believe OOMC means run.   If they wanted us to run,  then they would need to issue an OOME for the actual energy component.    I asked my employees to clarify with Ercot whether we were being asked to run,  yes or no.    When instructed to run by Ercot,  we had to assume that we were settled based upon the OOME calc, as we were previously under OOMC orders.

I sent at least three e-mails to my Ercot rep,  Mark Patterson regarding this issue.   I finally caught him by phone and he relayed that he thought Ercot's  intrepretation was correct.    For all of the times that we ran,  at their request,  we werent going to be paid based on the OOME heat rate calc,  rather we were going to receive the balancing energy price ( a penalty for Resource Imbalance).   For example,  in the early morning hours we would receive as little as $1 for electricity that cost $27 to generate.   Mark also mentioned that when they said run,  they expected us to sell to someone else,  or just generate into the imbalance.    Mark told me "dont worry,  you can file to receive your generation expenses in the event that you lost money."

Here is my view:
OOMC does not mean run.  It means have the capacity available in the event Ercot calls,  much like replacement,  responsive reserve and non-spinning.
Ercot's interpretation is being decided by the Manager of Mkt Operations,  a group supposedly unconcerned with price.
If OOMC means to run,  then why would the protocols contemplate, or need OOME?  They would never have to pay OOME if we were already running into the imbalance.
OOMC is an option and the exercise is OOME.   This is basically the disagreement.    This could very well be a $500,000 issue for Frontera.
Why would anyone generate for $27 and dump to the imbalance mkt at $5 in hopes of filing for a "breakeven."   Ridiculous.

I spoke with Bill Kettlewell with Customer Relations and he had "no comment" on whether OOMC means to generate.  Mark Patterson now also has "no comment."
Bill and Mark said that we needed to file a dispute in order to receive closure on the OOM capacity payment.   I suspect that we will follow this same path when we file for OOME reimbursement vs.  the imbalance price we will receive.

I had instructed my employeess to refuse to turn on the plant   (in response to an OOMC) until we receive an OOME instruction.   This has compelled  Ercot to deploy an OOME request to us, because they need  to have us online to control local congestion.   Would this not be an omission that their view was incorrect?  Section 5.4.4 says that a QSE may fail to comply with an Ercot directive if it causes a safety concern, or ,  Ercot is not in compliance with the Protocols.  The latter is in effect.
Ercot is now telling us that they cannot instruct us, or give us an OOME deployment,  unless we are already runnnig.    I think that this is a software issue, not a protocol issue.
We worked out an interim compromise with Ercot until this issue can be settled.  Once we have been OOMC'd,  we will start to gen.   Once we reach full load,  we will request an OOME.   If they dont comply,  we will shut down the unit.    Ercot said that " it was entirely reasonable that we would  request to be compensated in the form of an OOME."
The Ercot dispatchers are complaining that OOME requires them to send an instruction every 15 minutes.   Is this why we are not getting the OOME instruction on a regular basis?

Finally,  I stressed to Ercot that I wasnt trying to manipulate prices, via OOME or force Ercot into a corner.    It just is not the right economic environment to generate for $27 and sell for $5.    Further,  operations personell at Ercot have frelayed their displeasure with me for "forcing them to OOME our plant."

Can I get an opinion on whether OOMC means to run?   If you agree with me,  what is our next step?  I need to move aggressively on this issue.

Thanks,

JForney
37160


Jana,

Next Saturday or Sunday would work for me.
I shall be in Pittsburgh on Friday but I should be
back Saturday morning.

Vince

Jlpnymex@aol.com on 10/27/2000 10:21:29 AM
To: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Re: Fw: Will You Be The Difference?

Vince

How are you? We need to get together sometime soon for dinner and a movie.

Let me know your schedule, so we can plan a date.

Jana


Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-Path: <karen.mcnulty@usbank.com>
Received: from  rly-za03.mx.aol.com (rly-za03.mail.aol.com [172.31.36.99]) by
air-za01.mail.aol.com (v76_r1.23) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Nov 2000 16:05:40 -0500
Received: from  mx02.usbank.com ([156.36.240.14]) by rly-za03.mx.aol.com
(v76_r1.19) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Nov 2000 16:04:03 -0500
Received: from 10.207.4.79 by mx02.usbank.com with SMTP (WorldSecure Server
SMTP Relay(WSS) v4.5); Wed, 15 Nov 2000 13:04:26 -0800
X-Server-Uuid: 1e505468-1c7e-11d4-a4f6-0050da14be60
Received: from 10.88.32.240 by ntorccmx01.or.usbc.com with ESMTP (
WorldSecure Server SMTP Relay(WSS) v4.5); Wed, 15 Nov 2000 13:05:23 -0800
X-Server-Uuid: 9fbd4b68-d59c-11d3-ab85-0004ac4c2802
Subject: FW: The Golden Telephone
To: christian.c.casebeer@tek.com, andycox815@hotmail.com,
kac5575@hotmail.com,        erikdietz@yahoo.com, rgenor@hotmail.com,
patrick_hallinan@keybank.com,        JoeHutchinson@HamptonAffiliates.com,
jonesbr@hotmail.com,        kauz@terragon.com, charlesk@rosefestival.org,
kurtzi@aol.com,        LillahMay@aol.com, susan.mcdowell@usbank.com,
mcnultyleepatty@sprintmail.com, Matthew.Neff@phs.com,
julsandjerry@worldnet.att.net, jpickerd@lsil.com,
DPIERCE@TAXANALYSIS.COM, julie.podhora@usbank.com, lrodrigu@pcc.edu,
jason.rosario@codesic.com, sandlin@bendcable.com, sandozk@juno.com,
katherine.starkovich@usbank.com, joe@dynic.com, woods@pacifier.com,
kwoodall@standard.com, Kjzumbo@aol.com
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.3  March 21, 2000
Message-ID: <OF646CA068.7C76FC9B-ON88256998.007241F1@or.usbc.com>
From: karen.mcnulty@usbank.com
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2000 12:50:17 -0800
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on NTZTWREM04/OR/Servers/USB(Release 5.0.5
|September 22, 2000) at 11/15/2000 12:50:19 PM
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-WSS-ID: 160C251924528-01-01
X-WSS-ID: 160C25D272423-01-01
Content-Type: text/plain;  charset=iso-8859-1

GO BEAVS!!!!!!!!!!

The Golden Telephone

?A highly recruited high school football player was visiting schools to
find
the best university for him. His first stop was the University of
Washington.? When he got there, Coach
Rick Neuheisel immediately picked up a golden telephone.? After talking for

several minutes, he said, "Thank you, God" and hung up.? This shocked the
young man. He asked the coach what was so special about the golden phone.
"Well,
?this phone is a direct line to God.? God tells us whether or not new
recruits? would be stars at our university."

The athlete asked if he could use the phone to ask God what college he
should pick. "Sure, you can!? But it's going to
cost you $2,000.? Calling Heaven isn't cheap."? The fellow didn't have that

kind of money, so he moved along.

His next stop was at the University of Oregon.? Upon entering Coach Mike
Bellotti's office, Coach Bellotti immediately picked up a similar golden
telephone.? After talking several minutes, he said, "Thank you, God" and
hung up.? The boy said, "Hey, I've seen those phones before.? Can I use
yours to call God and ask what college I should pick?"? Coach Bellotti
said,
"Sure, but it's going to cost you $1,000.? Calling Heaven isn't cheap."
Again, not having that kind of money, the young man left.? Who would want
to
live in Eugene anyway?

?His last stop was in Corvallis at Oregon State University.? Upon arrival
at
the office, Coach Dennis Erickson picked up a golden telephone, talked to
God, and said, "Thanks," and hung up. The boy just had to use that phone,
so
he said,
?"Coach Erickson, I really need to use that golden telephone so I can call
God and ask him which college I should choose.? From Washington it was
going
to cost me $2,000.? From Oregon they wanted $1,000.? So how much will it
cost me
?to call Heaven from here at Oregon State?"

The coach smiled and said,? "Nothing, son. It's a local call."

GO BEAVERS!!!

CIVIL WAR IS COMING!!!DUCKS BETTER BEWARE!!!-YOU'RE IN OUR HOUSE!!!!
SALSA STADIUM WILL BE ROCKING!!!!!!!!!!!


OPEN IN PRIVATE

 - NicoleVanCroft01.jpg
 - NicoleVanCroft02.jpg
 - NicoleVanCroft03.jpg
 - NicoleVanCroft05.jpg
 - NicoleVancroft04.jpg
 - NicoleVanCroft06.jpg


Susan,

We have asked for engineering support from EEOS to help us research power generation opportunities along our pipelines.  They require some type of work order to charge their time and expenses and we need the same to track development costs for our initiatives.  I was told that a "project definition account" can be set up in SAP that can accumulate these costs and tie them to our group's cost center.  Could you please set up two such accounts?  Here are the particulars so far:

Account 1.
Name:  ETS Distributed Generation Initiative
Amount:  Not to exceed $100,000 in 2001
Access:  Eric Gadd, Kevin Hyatt, John Millar, Susan Wadle, Roger Tietz, Harry Okabayashi, Gus Eghneim

Account 2:
Name:  Bakersfield Powergen
Amount:  Not to exceed $50,000 in 2001
Access:  Eric Gadd, Kevin Hyatt, John Millar, Susan Wadle, Gary Bush, Mike Nanny, Steve Kemper

Let me know if a more formal tasking letter is necessary to set these up.  Thanks for your help.

John


Attached is the latest cost estimate and pressure ranges.

Ron M.


"You cannot be dependent upon your eyes when your imagination is out of
focus.8 - Mark Twain

Watch the Enron Building lobby on Wednesday, April 25th, from 11:30am to
1:00pm for information on some of
Enron's new innovative businesses.  You'll have the opportunity to meet
various business representatives and discuss
their products and services from the creative minds of our employees.  Watch
for Vince Kaminski
who will be present during this exciting exchange of information.

Featuring:
Deal Bench, enron.credit.com, Weather Risk Management, Enron Trading Game and
Xcelerator

Word of the Day
cerebration \ser-uh-BRAY-shun\, noun:
The act or product of thinking; the use of the power of reason; mental
activity; thought.


(See attached file: hpl0815.xls)

 - hpl0815.xls


There will not be a trader's roundtable meeting today.

Thank you,
Jennifer


Please make changes and send back to me
Thanks,
mara


Here it is.

Peggy Mahoney@EES
09/12/2000 11:19 AM
To: Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: testimony

Can I plez have a copy of Steve's testimony from yesterday in San Diego?

Thanks
Peggy


Start Date: 2/2/02; HourAhead hour: 9;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002020209.txt


I will out of the office Monday and Tuesday.

If you need me.  Please call Heather at ext 33278.

My pager number is 800-963-5783
Cell Phone is 713-562-8925

I will be at my Mom's house.  Phone 304-296-5200.

Don't hesitate to call if you need something.

Thanks

bob


Tana:

Neither BOG Resources, Inc. nor Koch Chemical Internation is authorized to
trade U.S. power products.  I'm doing some research into Cajun Electric and
will let you know if I need to change their status before I leave this
afternoon.

Leslie


-----Original Message-----
From: David Gensch [mailto:dag@cact.com]
Sent: Fri 4/26/2002 4:00 PM
To: undisclosed-recipients
Cc:
Subject: ng0429

CACT NG sheets for Monday


-----Original Message-----
From: Engel, Tom
Sent: Tuesday, February 5, 2002 4:37 PM
To: Smith, Regan M.; Allen, Thresa A.; Amador, Susan; Anastas, Sherry; Anderson, Bridgette; Anderson, Diane; Aucoin, Evelyn; Baker, Natalie; Baxter, Bryce; Bentley, Corry; Bosse, Kevin; Bowen, Bob; Brackett, Debbie R.; Campos, Anthony; Campos, Sylvia A.; Cason, Sharen; Dahlke, Andrea; Denny, Jennifer; Denton, Rhonda L.; Dupuy, Mark; Elledge, Susan; Evans, Casey; Garcia, Clarissa; George, Fraisy; Gillis, Brian; Hare, Bill D.; Hayden, Frank; Heal, Kevin; Heaney, Gordon; Hedstrom, Peggy; Hibbert, Greg; Hunter, Larry Joe; Huntley, Kelley; Jaquet, Tammy; Kenne, Dawn C.; Koulikov, Pavel; Lozano, Melba; Luc, Albert; Marryott, Michael; Mcginnis, Stephanie; McLaughlin Jr., Errol; Mendoza, Genaro; Meredith, Kevin; Moore, Kathy M.; Murphy, Melissa; Myers, Donnie; Reeves, Kathy; Richey, Cooper; Schield, Elaine; Schrab, Mark L.; Scott, Laura; Seib, Dianne; Severson, Russ; Sheidun, Donna; Steiner, David; Stevens, Mechelle; Stokley, Chris; Sullivan, Patti; Sweitzer, Tara; Theriot, Kim S.; Vander velde, Nikole; Wallumrod, Ellen; Wiebe, Chris; Winfree, O'Neal D.; Bharathi, Jaikishore; Boudreaux, Lori; Brewer, Charles; Chitradurga, Sundar; Clark, Cynthia; Deleon, Roberto; Dietrich, Dan; Fortney, Bill; Franks, Shawn; Greig, Iain; Henry, Jane Hilburn; Hunter, Wade; Johnson, Jeff; Krishnaswamy, Jayant; Lim, Francis S.; McKeel, Richard; Nolte, Ron; Pena, Matt; Poston, David; Powell, John D.; Ramesh, Ganapathy; Rao, Ramesh; Ray, Edward; Schmidt, Mark; Schomer, Chris; Stevens, Wilford; Stock, Steve
Subject: RE: PLEASE REVIEW - PROGRESS REPORT from testing on Monday, Feb 4th & WEDNESDAY AND THURSDAY TESTING SCHEDULE

ETX was supposed to be Electronic Transaction.  An exchange is a regulated body - which we are not.
We should be careful not to use the word "exchange".  I know this sounds trivial - but it matters to legal.

-----Original Message-----
From: Smith, Regan M.
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 3:43 PM
To: Allen, Thresa A.; Amador, Susan; Anastas, Sherry; Anderson, Bridgette; Anderson, Diane; Aucoin, Evelyn; Baker, Natalie; Baxter, Bryce; Bentley, Corry; Bosse, Kevin; Bowen, Bob; Brackett, Debbie R.; Campos, Anthony; Campos, Sylvia A.; Cason, Sharen; Dahlke, Andrea; Denny, Jennifer; Denton, Rhonda L.; Dupuy, Mark; Elledge, Susan; Engel, Tom; Evans, Casey; Garcia, Clarissa; George, Fraisy; Gillis, Brian; Hare, Bill D.; Hayden, Frank; Heal, Kevin; Heaney, Gordon; Hedstrom, Peggy; Hibbert, Greg; Hunter, Larry Joe; Huntley, Kelley; Jaquet, Tammy; Kenne, Dawn C.; Koulikov, Pavel; Lozano, Melba; Luc, Albert; Marryott, Michael; Mcginnis, Stephanie; McLaughlin Jr., Errol; Mendoza, Genaro; Meredith, Kevin; Moore, Kathy M.; Murphy, Melissa; Myers, Donnie; Reeves, Kathy; Richey, Cooper; Schield, Elaine; Schrab, Mark L.; Scott, Laura; Seib, Dianne; Severson, Russ; Sheidun, Donna; Steiner, David; Stevens, Mechelle; Stokley, Chris; Sullivan, Patti; Sweitzer, Tara; Theriot, Kim S.; Vander velde, Nikole; Wallumrod, Ellen; Wiebe, Chris; Winfree, O'Neal D.; Bharathi, Jaikishore; Boudreaux, Lori; Brewer, Charles; Chitradurga, Sundar; Clark, Cynthia; Deleon, Roberto; Dietrich, Dan; Fortney, Bill; Franks, Shawn; Greig, Iain; Henry, Jane Hilburn; Hunter, Wade; Johnson, Jeff; Krishnaswamy, Jayant; Lim, Francis S.; McKeel, Richard; Nolte, Ron; Pena, Matt; Poston, David; Powell, John D.; Ramesh, Ganapathy; Rao, Ramesh; Ray, Edward; Schmidt, Mark; Schomer, Chris; Smith, Regan M.; Stevens, Wilford; Stock, Steve
Subject: FW: PLEASE REVIEW - PROGRESS REPORT from testing on Monday, Feb 4th & WEDNESDAY AND THURSDAY TESTING SCHEDULE

Typo correction - ETX for Electronic Trading Exchange as the UBS name for EOL internal identifier, not EFX as my previous email.  Thanks Tom.

Regan Smith
Energy Operations Systems
Enron Net Works
713-853-9291 (wk); 281-850-7551 (cell)

-----Original Message-----
From: Smith, Regan M.
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 3:20 PM
To: Allen, Thresa A.; Amador, Susan; Anastas, Sherry; Anderson, Bridgette; Anderson, Diane; Aucoin, Evelyn; Baker, Natalie; Baxter, Bryce; Bentley, Corry; Bosse, Kevin; Bowen, Bob; Brackett, Debbie R.; Campos, Anthony; Campos, Sylvia A.; Cason, Sharen; Dahlke, Andrea; Denny, Jennifer; Denton, Rhonda L.; Dupuy, Mark; Elledge, Susan; Engel, Tom; Evans, Casey; Garcia, Clarissa; George, Fraisy; Gillis, Brian; Hare, Bill D.; Hayden, Frank; Heal, Kevin; Heaney, Gordon; Hedstrom, Peggy; Hibbert, Greg; Hunter, Larry Joe; Huntley, Kelley; Jaquet, Tammy; Kenne, Dawn C.; Koulikov, Pavel; Lozano, Melba; Luc, Albert; Marryott, Michael; Mcginnis, Stephanie; McLaughlin Jr., Errol; Mendoza, Genaro; Meredith, Kevin; Moore, Kathy M.; Murphy, Melissa; Myers, Donnie; Reeves, Kathy; Richey, Cooper; Schield, Elaine; Schrab, Mark L.; Scott, Laura; Seib, Dianne; Severson, Russ; Sheidun, Donna; Steiner, David; Stevens, Mechelle; Stokley, Chris; Sullivan, Patti; Sweitzer, Tara; Theriot, Kim S.; Vander velde, Nikole; Wallumrod, Ellen; Wiebe, Chris; Winfree, O'Neal D.; Bharathi, Jaikishore; Boudreaux, Lori; Brewer, Charles; Chitradurga, Sundar; Clark, Cynthia; Deleon, Roberto; Dietrich, Dan; Fortney, Bill; Franks, Shawn; Greig, Iain; Henry, Jane Hilburn; Hunter, Wade; Johnson, Jeff; Krishnaswamy, Jayant; Lim, Francis S.; McKeel, Richard; Nolte, Ron; Pena, Matt; Poston, David; Powell, John D.; Ramesh, Ganapathy; Rao, Ramesh; Ray, Edward; Schmidt, Mark; Schomer, Chris; Smith, Regan M.; Stevens, Wilford; Stock, Steve
Subject: PLEASE REVIEW - PROGRESS REPORT from testing on Monday, Feb 4th & WEDNESDAY AND THURSDAY TESTING SCHEDULE

Please review the progress report from Monday's regression test below.   It was a success, and the goals were accomplished!  Thank you for your participation!
All the issues should be resolved by now.  If you are aware of any open issues, please email me ASAP.
Invoices are being settled now, and we are starting the SAP testing for this afternoon.

We need your testing help (again), with the following tests below.  These are limited to ETX (the name formally known as EOL) entered deals only, but need to process to SAP.
Please review attached for those scheduled, and respond with any updates/ substitutions.

Wednesday 10:00am - 03:00pm
Test:  Mock-mock test - ETX deal entry only.
Purpose:  Perform a simulation of a 4 gas physical/ financial, 4 power physical/ financial transactions using (Reliant/ Duke/ Williams/ UBS Warburg Energy/ Enron Canada).
Goals include:
    (1) Simulate processing ETX transactions before Thursday mock test
    (2) If the NT user id conversion goes through on 02/05 pm, use the new UBS Id's
    (3) Validate any systems changes from Monday/ Tuesday

User involvement:  See attached schedule.   Please review and respond if any changes are needed.
    Global data should be setup already given we will use existing counterparties/ addresses/ contracts.

The ETX deals will be entered by 10:30, and we need the participants to process these downstream.

1305 UBS Warburg Energy LLC acting as agent for UBS AG, London Branch
11266 Enron Canada Corp (rename TBD eventually)
54979 Duke Energy Trading and Marketing, L.L.C.
64245 Williams Energy Marketing & Trading Company
65268 Reliant Energy Services, Inc.
3015 Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co.

Thursday 09:00am - 05:00pm
Test:  Mock ETX test -  ETX deal entry only.

Purpose:  The business is planning a mock trading session tentatively for 2/7 (Thursday). The plan is to use the UBS production systems. The traders will be using the EOL Stack Manager and their own real products. The originators will be hitting the web site using valid counterparty accounts.  ETX entry should last about 2 hours (probably 9am-11am), however, we need to settle these in the afternoon.
UBSW personnel will be monitoring the transactions from deal entry to SAP.

User involvement:  See attached schedule.   Please review and respond if any changes are needed.

We are requesting the same counterparties as above, but awaiting ETX's response.  We would like this to go as smooth as possible.

Questions, issues, please contact me!

Regan Smith
Energy Operations Systems
Enron Net Works
713-853-9291 (wk); 281-850-7551 (cell)

-----Original Message-----
From: Smith, Regan M.
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 8:24 PM
To: Johnson, Jeff
Cc: Rao, Ramesh; Pena, Matt; Clark, Cynthia; Schomer, Chris; Bennett, Stephen W.
Subject: PROGRESS REPORT - Netco testing schedule for Monday, Feb 4th

Below is an end of day progress report on Monday's regression test.

Summary:
We did complete as planned the 25 types of transactions, including global data setup, deal entry (EOL, Sitara, TDS, EnPower) scenarios.    EOL passed us 25 Gas and 40 power scenarios of which we tested a subset of transactions.  Today's test went a bit smoother given we pushed for the counterparties, contracts to be setup in advance.  We will continue with the Gas settlement on Tuesday morning, along with SAP processing at 1:00pm.

From a technical code perspective, there were no major interface issues.  Including TDS/ Sitara interface to Tagg as discussed earlier.
Errors reported include continued NT userid "pilot burn-in" issues, as well as replication issues with data.  Given we are processing in a very 'truncated' environment, downstream systems can have missing global data needed (regions, facilities, SAP information).  The open issues are being escalated and should be addressed by 10:00am tomorrow morning.

The goals of this regression test on Monday/ Tuesday are:
1) regression test a subset of scenarios (ie Physical Gas Sale, Physical Power Supply, Financial Swap, Intercomapny) now that the Global Data is more stable (UBS internal counterparties, profit centers, desks/ books)
2) Identify any reference to internal/ external screens that still have 'ENRON' reference, or 'EOL' reference
3) Ensure we have the latest price curve data from updates (ie TAGG/ERMS)
4) process new EOL data created for Monday.  To verify mid/ back office, including SAP processing.   EOL will also push data from a mock trading session for on 2/7 (see below)
5) provide the test data scenarios for SAP testing (scheduled Tuesday 1pm).  SAP is completing their setup with the new controlling area for NetCo.
6) Continue with NT Logins involved with PILOT until remaining are ported.

Accomplishments/  what worked?
1) Confirmation/ updates of most recent price curves into ERMS.  The data prior was from mid December.
2) Working with only the subset of counterparties as authorized as 'Active'
3) EOL deals did flow downstream.  However, the major were future periods that we cannot settle.  We modified the data to correspond to what downstream needed.
4) Gas - Volume Management, Logistics, and leading into Settlement
5) Power/ Financial  - EnPower/ Tagg, confirmations, leading into settlement

What did not?
1) Canada testing is still catching up, but improving.  They are identifying the counterparties, pipelines, test scenarios and anticipate continuing to test Tuesday.
2) Facilities missing, Canada pipelines missing, contracts not replicating into Unify (resolved).
3) Unify Tagg Deal Load.  The Unify Tagg Deal load was discovered at 5pm, and will be addressed early Tuesday am.

Focus on Tuesday
Given the new SAP environment has not been tested to date, we will monitor the Unify transmission/ SAP processing (scheduled for 1pm till).
There is much risk within SAP given the new counterparties, entities, xref tables, SAP information is just being setup.  We will also validate the intercompany transactions created on Monday.

Note:  Tuesday night (6pm - 8pm) is the scheduled NetCo test with Estate Shutdown.

Attachments to provide more detail:
    Integration Testing ISSUES.xls (see tab page for 0204)
    0204 Global Data Setup AND transactions.xls  (See tab page for 0204 open issues)

Regards,

Regan Smith
Energy Operations Systems
Enron Net Works
713-853-9291 (wk); 281-850-7551 (cell)


EES is listed as receiving $1.5 million for 7.5 MWs of reduction

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 03/20/2001 01:45 PM -----

	"Beiser, Megan" <Megan.Beiser@edelman.com>
	03/20/2001 01:19 PM

		 To: "Aaron Thomas (E-mail) (E-mail)" <athomas@newenergy.com>, "Andrea Weller
(E-mail) (E-mail)" <aweller@sel.com>, "andrew Chau (E-mail) (E-mail)"
<anchau@shellus.com>, "Bill Chen (E-mail) (E-mail)" <bchen@newenergy.com>,
"Douglas Oglesby (E-mail) (E-mail)" <doao@chevron.com>, "Fairchild, Tracy"
<tracy.fairchild@edelman.com>, "Jeffrey Hanson (E-mail) (E-mail)"
<jeff.hanson@phaser.com>, "jennifer Chamberlin (E-mail) (E-mail)"
<jnnc@chevron.com>, "john Barthrop (E-mail) (E-mail)"
<jbarthrop@electric.com>, "John Leslie (E-mail) (E-mail)" <jleslie@luce.com>,
"Joseph Alamo (E-mail) (E-mail)" <jalamo@enron.com>, "Manuel, Erica"
<Erica.Manuel@edelman.com>, "'Michael Nelson' (E-mail)"
<mnelson@electric.com>, "Peter Bray (E-mail) (E-mail)" <pbray@newpower.com>,
"Rebecca Schlanert (E-mail) (E-mail)" <rschlanert@electric.com>, "Richard
Counihan (E-mail) (E-mail)" <rick.counihan@greenmountain.com>, "'Robert
Morgan' (E-mail)" <rmorgan@newenergy.com>, "Sue Mara (E-mail) (E-mail)"
<smara@enron.com>, "Allen, Stevan" <stevan.allen@edelman.com>,
arm@phaser.com, "brbarkovich@earthlink.net" <brbarkovich@earthlink.net'>,
cra@calretailers.com, dennis.flatt@kp.org, dhunter@smithandkempton.com,
djsmith@smithandkempton.com, Dominic.DiMare@calchamber.com,
drothrock@cmta.net, gharrison@calstate.edu, hgovenar@govadv.com,
jackson_gualco@gualcogroup.com, ken_pietrelli@ocli.com, kgough@calpine.com,
kmccrea@sablaw.com, kmills@cfbf.com, lhastings@cagrocers.com, mday@gmssr.com,
mmoretti@calhealth.org, nplotkin@tfglobby.com, randy_britt@robinsonsmay.com,
richard.seguin@kp.org, RochmanM@spurr.org, rrichter@calhealth.org,
sgovenar@govadv.com, smccubbi@enron.com, spahnn@hnks.com, theo@ppallc.com,
vincent.stewart@ucop.edu, vjw@ceert.org, "Warner, Jami"
<jami.warner@edelman.com>, wbooth@booth-law.com, wbrown@lhom.com,
wlarson@calstate.edu
		 cc:
		 Subject: Press Release: GOVERNOR DAVIS ANNOUNCES STATE AGREEMENTS TO SPUR
ENERGY EFFICIENT BUILDINGS

Megan Beiser
Assistant Account Executive
Edelman Public Relations Worldwide, Sacramento
Phone: (916) 442-2331
Fax: (916) 447-8509

> PR01:104
> FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
> 03/20/2001 01:30 PM
>
>
> GOVERNOR DAVIS ANNOUNCES STATE AGREEMENTS TO SPUR ENERGY EFFICIENT
> BUILDINGS 03/20/2001
>
> SACRAMENTO
>
> Governor Gray Davis today announced that the California Energy Commission
> has signed 12 grants and contracts totaling almost $9.2 million to install
> "energy smart" technology in commercial and industrial buildings
> throughout the state.
>
> "Our campaign for conservation and improved energy efficiency will
> translate into real reductions in the summer when we need it most - and
> beyond," Governor Davis said. "With these grants in place, California will
> continue to set the national standard for energy efficiency."
>
> The agreements signed by Governor Davis will account for about 93
> megawatts of projected savings from buildings outfitted with demand
> responsive building systems technology. Demand responsive building systems
> work by using software that automatically dim lights, reduce air
> conditioning use, and cut other electrical loads. They operate in response
> to signals from the Independent System Operator (ISO) or from an electric
> utility or service provider.
>
> Under the agreements, commercial electricity customers will agree to shave
> peak loads by 10 to 30 percent upon receiving the signal from the ISO.
> They will be paid by the ISO to curtail electricity load in their
> buildings in real time.
>
> In addition to these grants, the Governor also announced that an
> additional eight megawatts of electricity would be saved through grants to
> the K-Mart Corporation. K-Mart will use a $2 million grant to replace old
> lighting fixtures with energy efficient ones in its 85 California stores.
>
> The demand responsive program and the innovative efficiency and renewables
> program covering the K-Mart grant are parts of AB 970, which was passed
> last year. The bill is designed to reduce at least 220 megawatts of peak
> load by June 1, 2001.
>
> The Governor has proposed an additional $70 million in his New Demand
> Reduction Initiative program that would yield an additional 160 megawatts
> in savings from demand responsive building systems.
>
> For more information, please contact the California Energy Commission.
>
> Demand Responsive Contracts:
> 1. Sacramento Municipal Utility District, $882,750, target savings: 10
> megawatts
> 2. Roseville Electric, $956,000, target savings: 10 megawatts
> 3. Pacific Gas and Electric, $1,411,026, target savings: 35 megawatts
> 4. Seiben Energy Associates, $340,245, target savings: 1.3 megawatts
> 5. Apogee Interactive, Inc., $422,915, target savings: 5 megawatts
> 6. Enron Energy Services Op. Inc. , $1,500,000, target savings: 7.5
> megawatts
> 7. San Diego Regional Energy Office, $1,085,476, target savings: 3.125
> megawatts
> 8. Global Energy Partner, LLC, $1,540,000, target savings: 15 megawatts
>
> Grants:
> 1. Cisco Systems, $40,460, target savings: 1.2 megawatts
> 2. Alameda County, $260,964, target savings: 1.2 megawatts
> 3. Hewlett Packard, $445,693, target savings: 1.8 megawatts
> 4. Foothill College District-De Anza, $283,140, target savings: 1.3
>
>
>
> Megan Beiser
> Assistant Account Executive
> Edelman Public Relations Worldwide, Sacramento
> Phone: (916) 442-2331
> Fax: (916) 447-8509
>


Looking forward to seeing it today, if possible.

Also, I assume it has a complete list of tasks you are working on for each of
the business units.

Thanks.

GP

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Beck, Sally
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2001 1:14 PM
To: Piper, Greg; Kitchen, Louise
Subject: Follow Up

As a follow up to our discussion earlier this week on commercialization of
mid and back office services and managing those responsibilities for EWS, I
will have a timeline for your review on Monday that will pinpoint key dates:
Unify conversion, EES absorption, HPL sale, commercialization, Todd Busby's
arrival, etc.  I will also have details of resource needs.  We can use this
to set internal expectations on the timing of successfully handling all of
these initiatives.  I will welcome your comments on the timeline.  --Sally


[IMAGE]
'CLICK 'CLICK 'CLICK

 [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] [IMAGE] TrueAdvantage's Sales Intelligence (SI) Database contains over 1,000,000 prospects and is updated daily with new opportunities.   Access our ENTIRE database of sales intelligence at www.trueadvantage.com   [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  Prospect Smarter! Build your pipeline with qualified prospects and search by keyword, company name, and industry.  [IMAGE]  Target "high probability" prospects! These business are 10 times more likely to buy products and services. [IMAGE]  Purchasing Trends! Past buying opportunities are an excellent indicator of future needs. [IMAGE]  Hot leads! Target businesses that have an immediate need for your products and services.  [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]   Paul Thomas  Based on your selection of industries and categories, we have found the following leads for you.         [IMAGE]        Construction & Facilities > Site Construction > Replace/Repair of Water Mains/Sewer/Wastewater  INSTALLATION OF WATER MAIN  CONSTRUCT IRRIGATION MAINS, AND A VACUUM SEWER SYSTEM   WATER MAIN REPLACEMENTS    WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS  WATER LINE EXTENSION PROJECT   SITEWORK  PAVING, DRAINAGE WATER, WASTEWATER STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS  INSTALLATION OF NEW SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM (SEPTIC SYSTEM REPLACEMENT AND NEW BATHROOMS  CONSTRUCT C-17 CORROSION CONTROL MAINTENANCE HANGAR   Energy > Energy Efficiency > Renewable Energy & Technology  ENEGY EFFICIENTY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY    Energy > Power & Fuels > Electricity Procurement  JANUARY 23 RFP   Energy > Power & Fuels > Fuel, Petroleum & Kerosene Procurement  REPLACE AN EXISTING FUEL STORAGE TANK MONITORING SYSTEM  UNLEADED AND DIESEL FUEL   Energy > Power & Fuels > Natural Gas & Propane  NATURAL  GAS SUPPLY AND RELATED SERVICES   Energy > Utility Related > Utilities Metering Products, Equipment & Services  MAJOR ELECTRIC UTILITY EQUIPMENT  PROVIDE FLOW METERS         [IMAGE]         If you have any questions or comments call us at 1(888)508-8783 ext 2 or email customerservice@trueadvantage.com .  Disable email alerts . You may disable these email alerts at any time.   Copyright 2001 TrueAdvantage, All Rights Reserved. Legal Disclaimer  Privacy Policy    [IMAGE]


(See attached file: newdaily.pdf)

      Carr Futures
      150 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 1500
      Chicago, IL 60606  USA
      Tel:  312-368-6149
      Fax:  312-368-2281
      soblander@carrfut.com
      http://www.carrfut.com
 - newdaily.pdf


Following please find the Weekly Management Report and the Daily Executive
Summary.

EnronOnline Executive Summary for 11/03/00
Transaction Summary
External Transactions Today	3,417
Average Daily External Transactions (30 day Trailing Avg)	3,032
Total Life to Date Transactions	406,456

EnronOnline Daily % of Entity's Total Transactions for 11/03/00	Trans	Percent
Enron North America	2,955	74%
Enron Europe Limited	141	35%
Global Products	123	28%
Enron Metals	198	17%

EnronOnline Percentage of Total Corporate Transactions
(30 day Trailing Avg)	46%

Gross Notional Value of EnronOnline Transactions	Total
Today	2,286,718,430
MTD	7,571,756,420
LTD	220,956,468,615
Average Daily Notional Value (30 Day Trailing Avg)	2,110,647,135

Notional Revenue from Physical Flows to Date	15,406,832,568

Counterparties, Users, and Products Offered
Counterparties having transacted to date	547
New Counterparties transacting for the first time today	3
Number of Products Offered Today	1,181
Total Number of External Users Logged on Today	2,688
Average # of External Users logged on (30 day Trailing Avg)	2,679

Also attached is the Weekly Public Domain Report, containing information
which is intended for use in presentations or reports which will be seen by
individuals outside Enron.


OR
Well, which one is it?  You want to share some information with the rest of
Enron, but you don't know whether it belongs in the ThinkBank or in eMeet.
Here is a handy quiz to help you make the decision.  Answers appear just
below the quiz.
What kind of information do you want to share?
A.  A well-developed idea or suggestion for something that will affect
Enron's bottom line, either through revenue or savings.
B.  A question or a statement that you want someone else at Enron to answer
or discuss.
C.  None of the above.
D.  Both A and B.
If you chose "A," deposit an idea in the ThinkBank's Idea Vault.  If you
chose "B," eMeet is the place for you.  If you chose "C" or "D," send an
e-mail to ethink@enron.com and let us know what you're trying to share.
We'll help you find the right place for it in eThink.

Wednesday, Mar. 29 at 10 a.m. Houston time, join Mark Koenig, executive vice
president of Enron Investor Relations.  Mark will answer questions about the
role of Investor Relations and also provide a stock update.  Remember, if you
can't make the live event, pre-submit your questions now on the eSpeak site.
Mark will be able to address them during his eSpeak, and you can see his
answers in the transcript after the event.

ethink.enron.com


This message is to inform you that information contained on your printed
pay advice for the pay period ending May 31, 2001, may be misleading.

Regardless of whether you have single or multiple direct deposits, your net
pay is correct, but your pay advice will indicate that all of your pay has
been deposited collectively to "Other Bank".  It does not list specific
bank accounts.  However, if you view your pay advice in eHRonline, you will
be able to confirm your scheduled direct deposits and verify the accounts
to which the deposits were made.

You may access eHRonline and view your pay advice by taking the following
steps:

?    Click the following link to open eHRonline:
https://ehronline.enron.com
?    Read the disclaimer
?    Click Accept
?    Type your SAP Logon ID (e.g. your "P" ID) in the User Id field.
?    Enter your SAP password in the Password field.
?    Click the Logon button.
?    Select Paycheck Inquiry from the drop-down list
?    Click the radio button next to Results in Period to select the default
for the May 31, 2001 pay advice
?    Click the Continue button.
?    Click the link for the 05/16/2001-05/31/2001 pay period to display
your pay advice.
?    Scroll to the bottom of the screen to view your direct deposit
details.

If you have additional questions about your pay advice or accessing
eHRonline, please contact the ISC Customer Care Group at 713.345.4727 or
isc.hotline@enron.com .

Thank you.


Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 07/18/2001 12:07 PM -----

	"US Publishing" <season@restructuringtoday.com>
	07/18/2001 01:58 PM
	Please respond to season

		 To: "RT Reader" <season@restructuringtoday.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Restructuring Today Wednesday July 18 2001

(see attached file:  rt010718.pdf)

Thank you,

Season Hawksley
US Publishing
800-486-8201
202-298-8201
 - rt010718.pdf


Interviewed a candidate yesterday who works for a competing shop.  They have a less sophisticated method of pricing full-requirements deals that I thought you might find interesting.

Customer migration - they price as a Put
Load following - they know its a short straddle position, but they have no tools to value so they base the price on historicals
Hedging - they always look to hedge out the position with standard block purchases
Ancillaries - they do no analysis, and simply add margin to the transaction
Adjustment clause - they have been adding fuel adjustment clauses to the deals that allow them to be cheaper up front
Booking - they have 2 books, spec trading and structured trading, the originator maintains P&L exposure on the transaction and works with the trader to assess how to manage/hedge the positions


Start Date: 1/26/02; HourAhead hour: 6;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002012606.txt


Jay,

I've always taken a pretty laid back approach to the noncompete when there is
little overlap.  Having said that, however, I'd like to keep a "last veto"
right - just give me a call when you've got something.

Good luck to you in the future, Jay.  You'll be missed at Enron.

Best regards,
Jeff

Jay Fitzgerald@ECT
05/09/2001 08:55 AM
To: Jeff Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: My Resignation, and a Question

Jeff-

As you may know, I have (somewhat reluctantly) decided to resign from Enron.
For some time now, I have wanted to take some time off, and had asked Whalley
about the possibility for a six month unpaid, unvested sabbatical.  Primarily
for reasons of precedence, he was unwilling to pursue this option, which,
while it is disappointing to me, I accept.

The purpose of this note is twofold.

First, I would like to thank you for making this company the great place it
is today, and for giving me the opportunity to have a great career here.  I
will forever look upon my nine plus years with Enron fondly.

Second, I would like to ask you as the administrator of the 1997 Long Term
Incentive Plan to allow me to explore opportunities in the venture capital
community without triggering non-compete provisions with regard to future
payouts.  I very much enjoyed my brief role in venture capital, and have some
very good contacts in that area here in New York.  Since NetWorks decided to
cease operations in that business earlier in the year, I should not think
that Enron would view anything I might do there as competitive, especially if
I were not working directly in the energy space with an Enron competitor.

At present, I am planning to spend my time at least through the summer
enjoying, and travelling with, my family.  I have nothing planned
professionally as of yet, but wanted to take the opportunity to drop you this
note while I might still be viewed positively (I hope that's not too
presumptuous!).

Please let me know your thoughts on this non-compete provision as I would not
wish for anything to be awkward for us going forward.

Again Jeff, thanks for many great memories, and as an Enron shareholder, keep
up the great work!

Jay


FYI.  Status of the proposed joint analysis.

    Britt
----- Forwarded by Britt Davis/Corp/Enron on 08/07/2000 08:05 AM -----

	Eric Tan@ECT
	08/07/2000 02:10 AM

		 To: "Clifford Bennett" <minton@singnet.com.sg>, Richard
Slovenski/SIN/ECT@ECT, Matthias Lee/SIN/ECT@ECT, Angeline Poon/SIN/ECT@ECT,
Victor Santos/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John Chismar/SIN/ECT@ECT,
Carol Chew/SIN/ECT@ECT, ngregson@wfw.com, Michael J Gasper/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
H Harrison/HOU/ECT@ECT, James P Studdert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan
Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael Philips/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael A
Robison/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Graham Cane/LON/ECT@ECT,
Wietze Dingeldein/LON/ECT@ECT, Britt Davis/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
David.best@clyde.co.uk, Paul Henking/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: PACIFIC VIRGO - Elang Crude - B/L 21 June 2000 - Joint Analaysis

For your info.  The samples from SGS Philippines will be arriving Singapore
this week and intention is to hold a joint anlaysis asap - likely middle of
next week.

---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Tan/SIN/ECT on 07/08/2000 15:06
---------------------------

Eric Tan
07/08/2000 15:04
To: "John Dwane"<tankers@ssysin.com.sg>
cc:
Subject: Re: PACIFIC VIRGO - Elang Crude - B/L 21 June 2000

To:  SSY, Singapore

 Attn:  John Dwane / Chris Twiss / Leo / Helen Cheo

Please convey to Owners of Pacific Virgo that we will be arranging a joint
analysis of the Elang cargo in Singapore sometime middle of next week.  We
will revert with details as soon as the samples (from Philippines) arrive
Singapore in the next couple of days.  Meantime, we nominate SGS Singapore to
conduct the analysis and would appreciate your agreement.

Thanks.

Regards
Eric


Here is the latest.  Have a good weekend.

Kathleen


---------------------- Forwarded by Jason Sokolov/HOU/ECT on 04/30/2001 05:02
PM ---------------------------

Tracy Pan <pcp@pop.ruf.rice.edu> on 04/30/2001 11:09:19 AM
Please respond to pcp@rice.edu
To: Jason.Sokolov@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Energy Derivatives Project Tracy Pan Part 2

-----Original Message-----
From: Jason.Sokolov@enron.com [mailto:Jason.Sokolov@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 8:16 AM
To: pcp@rice.edu
Subject: Re: About the Energy Derivative Project

Tracy,
Break it down into 8000 files of 1 kB, and send each one in a separate
mail.

Just kidding!
Try to send the whole thing.
If one of the servers refuses to accept it, then break it down into several
pieces.
I know for sure that I can take files as large as 2MB.

Jason

 - 665 Team Project--Tracy Pan Part 2.xls


FYI re:  Crane.  Michelle

---------------------- Forwarded by Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT on 09/08/2000 10:26
AM ---------------------------

FMackin@aol.com on 09/08/2000 09:50:51 AM
To: Michelle.Cash@enron.com, Rick_Johnson@enron.com, dlenfes@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Project Crane

Attached is my preliminary report based on the information in the data room.

There was not near enough information in the data room, and for the second
time, there was no one from the Seller present at the data room who we could
ask questions of.

There are a couple of areas of concern.  There is still a lot of data to be
furnished.  Much of the documents in the data room was not allowed to be
copied.

I have instructed Paul Blundy, the  attorney contact for our Canadian counsel
to have documents sent to Rick.

Rick, as you receive data that involves benefits, please send it to Dee.

I provided a copy of our Q format to Roland, our Canadian labor counsel, to
format and revise as need to fit the Canadian companies being acquired.  He
seemed to be knowledgeable in labor relations, but will need actuarial help
(as will we) in reviewing the benefit accruals for defined benefit plans.

For the next two weeks, I will have my beeper and will check my phone
messages as I find telephones in the wilderness.

I also provided a hard copy of the attachment to the Enron deal guys before I
left Toronto.

Pat

 - Crane DDlgnce Q1.doc


Anytime after 8 AM Pacific works for me.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  MedleyB@gtlaw.com@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-MedleyB+40gtlaw+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 9:59 AM
To: Jacoby, Ben; Krimsky, Steven; Mann, Kay
Subject: Conference call on Monday morning

Please let me know your availability ASAP for a conference call with Debbie
to discuss the Pompano and Deerfield agreements; we need to submit something
to the City Attorney in Deerfield Beach on Monday afternoon.

Rebecca C. Medley
(954) 768-8230
Assistant to Debbie M. Orshefsky
and Frank Schnidman

_______________________________________________________________
The information contained in this transmission may contain
privileged and confidential information.  It is intended only
for the use of the person(s) named above. If you are not the
intended recipient,  you are hereby notified that any review,
dissemination, distribution or duplication of this
communication is strictly prohibited. If you are not the
intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email
and destroy all copies of the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, please send an
email to postmaster@gtlaw.com.


---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Neal/HOU/ECT on 04/02/2001 04:52 PM
---------------------------
From: Jennifer Bagwell/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/02/2001 04:29 PM
To: Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: David Fairley/ENRON@enronXgate
Subject: Sample ENE Presentation

Scott,
Please see the attached presentation.  It incorporates a comprehensive view
of Enron.  Please let me know if you require additional information.

Thank you.  Jennifer (X54947)


Yes, this should be a purchase, and I've changed it. Thanks for your alert!

Kate

Melissa Ann Murphy
02/21/2001 08:59 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: 526479

Hello, this trade is in as a sell and it is a transmission deal with BPA.
Could you check to see if this should be a purchase?

Thanks,
Melissa


I am going to have lunch with a client at noon  Friday in the Westheimer and Sam Houston tollway area.  If it would work  out OK for you I thought we could try to play somewhere out 59 South, so you  will be closer to home.  If you can I would like to get some dinner after  we play as well.  I will give you a call after the close this afternoon to  see what you think.

Bob


Attached is our proposed form of NDA.  Let me know if you have any questions
or if I can be of further service.


I already have this date on my calendar.  Count me in.  --Sally

George Hope
04/05/2000 08:57 AM
To: Steve Venturatos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jody
Crook/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bob Klein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael
Benien/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Justin O'Malley/HOU/EES@EES, Angie
Zeman/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Elmo Gore/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Clifton
Franklin/HOU/EES@EES, Lauren Schlesinger/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: April 19th OU presentation

 We have a presentation planned for April 19th at the University of Oklahoma
for the JC Penney leadership group and the Energy
Management students. We plan on giving a "panel discussion" for the students
that will be followed by a social event. I would like for all
of you to be on the panel fielding a variety of questions from the group
regarding Enron. Please look on your calendars and let me know
your availability as soon as possible so we can book this event. Here is a
tentative schedule:
  APRIL 19th
  Participant arrival - 3:00pm. ( Location TBD)
  Student arrival- 4:00pm.
  Presentation- 4:00-5:30pm
  Social- 6:00-8:00pm. ( Cowboy Rodeo)

Thank you and I look forward to hearing from you.
      George Hope


Please take care of this if you have any to be flipped.  Thanks.

DG
---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 02/26/2001
10:20 AM ---------------------------

Stacey Vallejo
02/26/2001 09:17 AM
To: Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam
Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor Guggenheim/HOU/ECT@ECT, William Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Sherry Dawson/NA/Enron@Enron, Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Luchas
Johnson/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Friendly Reminder

This is just a quick reminder for all of you to please go into all of your
books and flip out all the deals that are supposed to settle with ECC and a
third counterparty  to the FT-US/CAND-ERMS book by the end of the day today.
Nymex closes today, and we need to make sure that all the deals are booked
correctly for both the Calgary and Houston offices.  This is most important
for February and March 2001 deals.

Please let me know if you have any questions on this.

Thanks for all your help
Stacey


Sure, I'd also like to get John Nowlan involved, who runs our crude
businesss.

James A Hughes@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
12/18/2000 01:04 PM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman@ECT
cc: Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Dabhol Workout

Jeff:

As I am sure you are aware, we are facing some significant challenges with
the Dabhol project.  The government is making noise about reviewing the
project and our customer is facing significant financial stress.  The plant
runs on LNG that is indexed to JCC, effectively giving our customer a
significant crude oil exposure.  As we consider a workout proposal, one thing
that I have considered is the possibility of embedding some crude oil
protection into the workout structure.  I would greatly appreciate it if I
could borrow a few minutes of your time to (i) get a sense of where we see
forward pricing right now and (ii) share with you our thoughts on the workout.

Jim