Remarkably clear explanation.

	From:  Ben F Jacoby @ ECT                           09/20/2000 06:48 PM

Sent by: Ben Jacoby@ECT
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: LM6000 Title Transfer Question

FYI, see below.
---------------------- Forwarded by Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT on 09/20/2000 06:43 PM
---------------------------

Matthew Tezyk@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
09/20/2000 06:13 PM
To: Ben F Jacoby@ECT
cc: Dan Shultz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mike
Coleman/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Dick
Westfahl/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: LM6000 Title Transfer Question

Ben,

Does ENA wish to accept Title of 14 LM6000's on September 26, 2000, or accept
Title of these Units after each has been issued an Inspection Acceptance
Certificate from EECC QA/QC department?

The following is a summary of the LM6000 Title Transfer Question:

Mike Storm, GE/SSEP Project Manager, requested from me, on 9/19/00, to accept
title of 14 LM6000's no later 9/26/00.  I informed him I was not authorized
to make this decision and that I would contact the Owner to make the
decision.  I further informed Mike Storm that our Owner would not accept
those terms and a compromise must be worked out.
Contract Reference 15.2.1 of contract 24-LM6K-2-99 states: title transfers
when equipment is ready to ship to the delivery point and seller notifies
purchaser of such event.
Delivery Point is defined as the SSEP storage yard.
SSEP has notified us that Units #1-14 are "Ready to Ship".
Contract Reference 10.2.3 of contract 24-LM6K-2-99 states: purchaser has the
right to inspect the equipment for "completeness prior to loading on
transport to delivery point".
We have inspected the first eleven Units and have informed SSEP that Units
#1-14 ARE NOT COMPLETE and therefore are NOT at the Delivery Point.
FACT: Units # 1-11 are at the delivery point. #12-14 are at SSEP.
FACT: If we sent a truck to SSEP tomorrow, NONE of the UNITS would be "Ready
to Ship" to a project site.
FACT: SSEP QA/QC has 15 Non Conformance Reports on these 14 turbines which
need to be corrected before they are "Ready to Ship".
It is in the best interests for both companies to correct the Non
Conformance's prior to shipment to the delivery point or project site.
RECOMMENDATION: I recommend that we DO NOT accept Title until the Units are
actually ready to be shipped to a project site.  The problem is that NONE OF
THE UNITS ARE READY TO SHIP!  SSEP has to work off punchlist items which
their QA/QC department has listed on Non Conformance Reports.  At this
juncture, no money can be withheld from SSEP. To ensure they will be fixed,
Title should transfer after our QA/QC inspectors give written notice that
each Unit is complete and ready to ship.  This will protect ENA on the
quality of the machines, as well as, ensure that little or no "re-work" is
performed in the field.

If you require further information or any assistance in this matter, please
feel free to contact me at 713-646-8258.

Matthew Tezyk
Project Manager


Start Date: 3/1/01; HourAhead hour: 6;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001030106.txt


More election humor...

______________________________________________________________________________
_______
Get more from the Web.  FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com

 - Grinch1.jpg


They will be there for one day this week, but really not till Sunday, when
they leave Houston for Cincy.


All,
Here is an updated program with a laundry list of speakers.  This afternoon at
5:30/2:30 we need to:

1)  Make introductions

2)  Agree on general format

3)  Agree on date.  Bill prefers October so we need to resolve that.

4)  Agree on initial list of speakers.

5)  Determine contacts most likely to get the speakers to accept, and assign
calling list.

For selecting speakers, Lee and I have discussed a cascading selection method
(in the spirit of cascading electricity ancillary service auctions I suppose)
by
which we try to get a commitment from our top choice then select our second
choice to ensure balance with the first, and each step of the way try to
ensure
the next selection provides balance to the existing slate.  Since we'll all be
on the phone together our first step should still be to establish a top list
and
assign responsibility for calling a few people.

Talk to you soon!  Bill can you set up the call and send around the call-in
number? Thanks.
Rob <<Draft  program 090500.doc>>

Rob Gramlich
PJM Market Monitoring Unit
(610) 666-4291
gramlr@pjm.com

 - Draft  program 090500.doc


---------------------- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES on 06/13/2000 03:49
PM ---------------------------

"Cherry, Brian - TPBKC" <BCherry@sempra.com> on 06/13/2000 02:35:23 PM
To: "'Pocta, Robert M.'" <rmp@cpuc.ca.gov>, "Cherry, Brian - TPBKC"
<BCherry@sempra.com>, "'AlexanMS@sce.com'" <AlexanMS@sce.com>,
"'paulamirault@aec.ca'" <paulamirault@aec.ca>, "'david.bayless@utility.com'"
<david.bayless@utility.com>, "'Tomb@crossborderenergy.com'"
<Tomb@crossborderenergy.com>, "'Burkee@cts.com'" <Burkee@cts.com>,
"'Craigc@calpine.com'" <Craigc@calpine.com>,
"'Rick.Counihan@greenmountain.com'" <Rick.Counihan@greenmountain.com>,
"'Jdasovic@enron.com'" <Jdasovic@enron.com>, "'Mday@gmssr.com'"
<Mday@gmssr.com>, "'bdingwall@unitedgas.com'" <bdingwall@unitedgas.com>,
"'Douglass@arterhadden.com'" <Douglass@arterhadden.com>, "'eke@aelaw.com'"
<eke@aelaw.com>, "'Jfawcet@enron.com'" <Jfawcet@enron.com>,
"'rfoss@coral-energy.com'" <rfoss@coral-energy.com>, "'Gileau, Patrick L.'"
<plg@cpuc.ca.gov>, "'johnj@bcjlaw.com'" <johnj@bcjlaw.com>,
"'Johnson_Pamela@lacoe.edu'" <Johnson_Pamela@lacoe.edu>,
"'karpjos@sf.whitecase.com'" <karpjos@sf.whitecase.com>, "'jleslie@luce.com'"
<jleslie@luce.com>, "'kmccrea@sablaw.com'" <kmccrea@sablaw.com>,
"'jmpa@dynegy.com'" <jmpa@dynegy.com>, "'porterdk@sce.com'"
<porterdk@sce.com>, "'RochmanM@cubjpa.org'" <RochmanM@cubjpa.org>,
"'RochmanM@spurr.org'" <RochmanM@spurr.org>, "'susan.scott@enron.com'"
<susan.scott@enron.com>, "Betonte, Robert - TP2RSB" <RBetonte@socalgas.com>,
"Brill, Thomas R." <TBrill@sempra.com>, "Follett, B. David - TPDBF"
<DFollett@sempra.com>, "Harrigan, James P. - TP1JPH"
<JHarrigan@socalgas.com>, "Hay, James E." <JHay@sempra.com>, "Lorenz, Lad -
TPLPL" <LLorenz@socalgas.com>, "McVay, Nancy W - TPNWM"
<NMcVay@socalgas.com>, "Morrow, Rick - TP3RMM" <RMorrow@socalgas.com>,
"Purves, Ralph A." <RPurves@SDGE.com>, "Sakarias, Wayne P."
<WSakarias@SDGE.com>, "Schavrien, Lee" <LSchavrien@sempra.com>, "Sullivan,
Glen J." <GSullivan@sempra.com>, "Surak, Thomas M. - TP1TMS"
<TSurak@socalgas.com>, "Teeter, James S." <JTeeter@SDGE.com>, "Van Lierop,
Jan - TP2JXV" <tp2jxv@socalgas.com>, "Watson, Steven - TP2SAW"
<SWatson@socalgas.com>, "Wright, Gillian - TP1GXW" <GWright@sempra.com>,
"Barker, David - TPDTB" <DBarker@socalgas.com>, "'How-Downing, Lindsey'"
<lindseyhowdowning@dwt.com>, "'Jun, Christine'" <chj@aelaw.com>, "'Gileau,
Patrick L.'" <plg@cpuc.ca.gov>, "'Khoury, Dexter'" <bsl@cpuc.ca.gov>,
"'ack@aelaw.com'" <ack@aelaw.com>, "Nelson, Eric B. - TPEBN"
<ENelson@socalgas.com>, "Suwara, J.- TPJUS" <JSuwara@sempra.com>, "Wright,
Gillian - TP1GXW" <GWright@sempra.com>, "Reed, William" <WReed@sempra.com>,
"'Pedersen, Norman'" <napedersen@jonesday.com>, "'Paul, Joe'"
<jmpa@dynegy.com>, "'Hawiger, Marcel'" <marcel@turn.org>, "'Fawcett, Jeff'"
<jfawcet@enron.com>, "'O'Neill, Ed'" <ewo@jmbm.com>, "'Power, Pat'"
<pjpowerlaw@aol.com>, "'Ramirez, Jaime'" <jaime.ramirez@swgas.com>, "'Black,
Larry'" <larry.black@swgas.com>, "Fair, Pam" <PFair@SDGE.com>, "'Hall, Rich'"
<rch8@PGE.com>, "'Eisenman, Eric'" <EXE3@PGE.com>, "'Stoner, Ron'"
<rrs5@PGE.com>, "'McConn, Kathy'" <mcconnk@epenergy.com>
cc:
Subject: FW: Late Exhibit Draft

Attached for your review and comment is a draft table identifying incoming
interstate capacity at receipt points on SoCalGas' system and a system map
identifying those locations, per the request of ALJ Biren.? We have confirmed
wherever possible the incoming receipt point capacities with the pipelines
and also tried to fairly characterize the take-away capacities and deliveries
from those receipt points.? Please forward your comments to me as soon as
possible so that we can coordinate the filing of the draft exhibit to the
service list by July 16.

? <<exhibitpipecap.xls>>  <<SoCalGas.doc>>

 - exhibitpipecap.xls
 - SoCalGas.doc


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 03/14/01 05:45 PM -----

	Walter Guidroz/ENRON@enronXgate
	03/14/01 05:33 PM

		 To: Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel
Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/ENRON@enronXgate,
Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli
Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate, Cynthia Clark/ENRON@enronXgate, Enron Europe
Global Contracts and Facilities@ENRON, Enron Europe Global
CounterParty/LON/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom
Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Claudia Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S
Bradford/ENRON@enronXgate, Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Juana
Fayett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jana Morse/Corp/Enron@Enron, Trang Le/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Paul Maley/LON/ECT@ECT, Sonya Clarke/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim Davies/LON/ECT@ECT,
Karen O'Day/NA/Enron@Enron, Tanya Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Kelly
Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron, Brian Lindsay/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, EOL Call Center@ENRON, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill D
Hare/HOU/ECT@ect, Amy Heffernan/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Molly LaFuze/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Danny Clark/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc:
		 Subject: EOL approvals, 03-14-01

Please see attached.


In this issue:
 - Feature: Power Semiconductors - Still Flying Below the Radar
 - Independent power producers fell after AES revised earnings downward.
 - All the news, commentary, and earnings reports, plus price performance and valuation charts.
 <<prometheus010928.pdf>>
Best regards,
Cary, Peter and the Team

 - prometheus010928.pdf


Please let me know if you see anything else that needs to be changed.

Sonia Hennessy
Enron Networks
Phone# 713-345-4858
Fax# 713-646-2443
Location:  EB3103g
sonia.hennessy@enron.com


That's it..........thanks....

Your on vacation, stop checking your email..........enjoy Incubus!!

Patrick

-----Original Message-----
From: McLaughlin Jr., Errol
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 9:02 AM
To: Mulvany, Patrick
Subject: RE: EOL deal

If this is the trade w/ Virginia Power (I am at home on vacation), talk w/ Chris Chang in settlements.  She called me last week and said they were disputing the volume and we agreed to change the trade.  If is not w/ Va. Power, call me at 713-870-8211.

-----Original Message-----
From: Mulvany, Patrick
Sent: Tue 11/20/2001 8:39 AM
To: McLaughlin Jr., Errol
Cc:
Subject: EOL deal

Errol,

There is an EOL trade that you changed the volume from 2,500/day to 5,000/day.  In EOL, the trade data reads 2,500/day.  Is there a reason for that change?

Thanks,

Patrick


fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 08/15/2000 04:26
PM ---------------------------

Roseann Engeldorf
08/15/2000 08:47 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Revised Purchase Option Assignement and Assumption Agreement

Would you like a look?

Rose
---------------------- Forwarded by Roseann Engeldorf/Corp/Enron on
08/15/2000 08:46 AM ---------------------------

"ROB TAYLOR" <TAYLR@andrews-kurth.com> on 08/14/2000 05:41:55 PM
To: <Roseann.Engeldorf@enron.com>, <toxley@winston.com>
cc:

Subject: Revised Purchase Option Assignement and Assumption Agreement

As I mentioned in my voice mail to Tim and as discussed with Rose, attached
are clean and marked (against the form of Exhibit attached to the S&S ADA)
drafts of the Purchase Option Assignment and Assumption Agreement.

Please let me know if you have any questions or comments regarding the
attached.

Regards,

Rob Taylor
Andrews & Kurth L.L.P.
Chase Tower
600 Travis Street
Suite 4200
Houston, Texas  77002

Tel:  (713) 220-4436
Fax:  (713) 238-7273

robtaylor@andrews-kurth.com

This e-mail (and any attachment(s) hereto) is intended only for use by the
addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or
confidential information.  If you are not the intended recipient of this
e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this e-mail (and any attachment(s) hereto) is strictly
prohibited.  If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately
notify me at (713) 220-4436 and permanently delete the original and any copy
of such e-mail and destroy any printout of such e-mail.

 - AssignAs.DOC
 - Purchase.DOC


Steve,

Try bmckay@enron.com or Brad.McKay@enron.com


Robin - the NG-PRICE2-PRC book is now set up in RisktRAC and has been placed
in the respective portfolios.  Please contact me if you have any questions.

Thank you,
Susan
x3-1462

Robin Rodrigue
02/21/2001 09:13 AM
To: Susan D Trevino/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: New Book

Susan,

The NG-PRICE-PRC book will now be calculated using two post ids.  Therefore,
we need an additional RisktRAC book id for the Price book so that we can
capture both post ids.  Please set up an NG-PRICE2-PRC book with the same
attributes as the NG-PRICE-PRC book.  The new books needs to be added to the
AGG-GAS, AGG-GASIII and AGG-GASIV portfolios.  In AGGIII and IV, please set
up a separate portfolio for the new book.  The new portfolio should be named
M_Maggi.

If you have any questions, give me a call.
Thanks,
Robin


Today, Friday, Gary Fergus of the Brobeck firm and I met with Attny. Harvey
Morris of the CPUC to negotiate an extension of time for responding to the
five subpoenas issued to Enron affiliates and Portland General.   We
negotiated both an extension for initial responses (two weeks) plus an
opportunity to submit a proposal for a significant reduction in the scope of
the request for production of documents.   This will include a further
extension for other documents that are to be produced, as well as a
reservation of rights to object to the production of other documents.  We
are working in close contact with Richard Sanders and the EPMI legal team in
Portland on further refining both responses and potential objections.

However, in light of recent communications between the Governor's office and
senior Enron officials, and the prospect of additional such communications,
Both Gary and I wanted to report an unusual aspect of the negotiation with
the CPUC.   At the beginning of the meeting, as we were indicating the
overall burden of the request, the CPUC attorney indicated the extreme
pressure the Commission was under to "get to the bottom" of what was
happening in the California power markets.  He also recited that "many
parties have pledged their cooperation in this investigation to the
Governor".  He then proceeded to state that parties who delayed providing
responses and raised objections to the requests for production instead of
cooperating would "be placed on a list of non-cooperative parties" which
would be made available to the Governor and legislators and that such
parties would have to bear the consequences of such actions.

This rather explicit threat is, in my experience, unprecedented at the CPUC.
I also know the attorney in question well enough to know that he would never
invoke political reprisals on his own, and was obviously instructed to do so
by CPUC Pres. Lynch or her senior staff.  Both Gary Fergus and I responded
that such a threat was both improper and disturbing for a party simply
trying to exercise its legitimate rights to adjudicate burdensome discovery
requests, but there was no attempt to withdraw the threat.  This comment
speaks volumes about the pressure which the CPUC President feels to achieve
a politically acceptable result in this matter.  Those senior Enron
officials in communication with the Governor should be made aware of this
incident.

Mike Day


We have just launched our "New & Improved Website",
www.newbedfordchamber.com
 and I have a new email address:

jmathes@newbedfordchamber.com

Please make the appropriate changes in your email address book.

Thank you,

Jim Mathes, President
New Bedford Area Chamber of Commerce


Attached is an analysis of the probability of a devaluation in Argentina and
the contractual protections TGS has in the event of a devaluation.

Long and short of it is -

Argentina's economy is primarily dollarized and it would appear that a
devaluation would do considerable short term harm to the economy.

Convertibility Law was enacted in 1991.  Large part of the population
remembers the super inflation of 1989 and 1990.

To devalue the currency, Argentina would have to amend the Convertibility Law
- this requires  approval of the Federal Congress.

TGS has numerous layers of protection from a devaluation - in addition to the
Convertibility law, it has protection through its license and regulations.
Indeed, as you remembered, the tariff is indexed to the exchange rate.

A concern is - to the extent the Government takes action as drastic as
changing the Convertibility Law to implement a devaluation, and it is willing
to suffer the short term economic and political harm of a devaluation - then
there is a reasonable chance they would go the extra step and find a way
delink the tariffs of the privatized regulated companies from the dollar.
In this case Enron would have protection under the BIT treaty.

The impact on Enron's P&L is a function of whether or not we use the Peso as
the functional currency.  If we use the Peso as the functional currency -
Enron would have a signficant negative translation adjustment from a
devaluation.  If we use the dollar as the functional currency - there would
be no impact on our income statement.   I will research this further in order
to ensure we can use the dollar as a our functional currency.

Pete


Hey team, I entered a sale of 10,659 in M3 for the 1st (deal 144104).  This
does not include anything that has PECO-PA gas.  Morgan and/or Phil have to
help me figure out what that is.

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 12/28/99 09:58
AM ---------------------------

pdrexel@columbiaenergygroup.com on 12/28/99 09:18:43 AM
To: Dan Junek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FINAL - JANUARY 2000 NEEDS

---------------------- Forwarded by Paul Drexelius/CES/ColumbiaGas on 12/28/99
09:25 AM ---------------------------

KIM NOVSEK BIZIK
12/28/99 09:05 AM

To: Morgan Sharifi/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Dale Ray
East/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Phil Villagomez/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas,
Darren Espey/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
cc: Noel Bartlo/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Paul
Drexelius/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Marianne
Stiles/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Joanne Swogger/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
Subject: FINAL - JANUARY 2000 NEEDS

Good Morning.  As per my conversation with Noel this morning, he will be
getting back to be whether CG&E will be served off ANR or TGT.  I have space
of
2000 dth at Springboro as per CG&E.

I have my PECO numbers listed below in purple.

ANR
 CG&E- deliveries to Springboro 1550 dth/day LDC Nom Deadline is
12:30 on the 30th - note this can be served off TGT

Tetco
 BUG  145 dth/day LDC Nom Deadline is noon on the
28th
 Con Ed 261 dth/day  (estimate ONLY) LDC Nom Deadline is 2
pm on the 30th
 PECO  1006 dth/day Monday - Friday and 452 dth/day
Saturday and Sunday LDC Nom Deadline is noon on the 30th
 PECO-PAGas  250 dth/day Monday - Friday and 230 dth/day Saturday and
Sunday
 PSEG  1696 dth/day LDC Nom Deadline is 10 pm on the 29th
 Etown  23 dth/day LDC Nom Deadline is noon on the
29th
 NJN  7528 dth/day LDC Nom Deadline is 12:30 est on
the 30th

CNG - PA gas for PECO /day  (If we have a problem flowing this much,
please let me know as soon as possible so we can buy delivered gas to PECO's
gate from one of the other suppliers)

Transco
 LILCO  382 dth/day    (capacity release is also for
382) LDC Nom Deadline is noon on the 27th
 PSEG  189 dth/day LDC Nom Deadline is 10 pm on the
29th
 S Jersey  113 dth/day Transco nom must show Enduser # 012224 to
be confirmed- LDC Deadline is 12:30 on the 30th
 Piedmont 1113 dth/day LDC Nom Deadline was 10:30 est on
the 22nd - just need activity number now
 PSNC  190 dth/day (CES will get the capacity release for
this from PSNC)
   The supply will be from PSNC's pool #7620 (this is
their station 85 pool)

Texas Gas
 DP&L  1298 dth/day  LDC Nom Deadline is
12:30 est on the 30th
 CG&E  1550 dth/day LDC Nom Deadline is 12:30 on
the 30th - note this can be served off TGT


Team
First I would like to Thank You for you commitment, diligence and excellence you have provided to the BRM Deal thus far.

We are now entering a phase where you will be required to complete assignments in a timely fashion in order to provide the necessary content for this project. The content directly determines how great the end product of this project will be for Enron and possibly third parties (i.e. be mindful and raise red flags when content might expose an Enron competitive advantage).

In addition, to scheduled meetings with the Accenture team, your assignments will have two phases. One, you will provide the content to build a specific topic. Two, you will review the content provided by another Content SME and provide input on their work product. Thus each topic of our content will be reviewed by two Content SME's.  Below you will find the assignment table as well as the following:
	Knowledge System Responsibilities for SME's
	What SME responsibilities for the Knowledge System will not include
	SME Process for Topic Development

---------------+----------------------+------------------------|
 |       NAME       |    TOPIC TO BUILD    |   TOPIC(S) TO REVIEW   |
 |------------------+----------------------+------------------------|
 | Ed McMichael     | Risk Identification, | Options, Accounting and|
 |                  | Commodities          | Reporting              |
 |                  | Fundamentals         |                        |
 |------------------+----------------------+------------------------|
 |Berney Aucoin     | Organization         | Futures, Forwards      |
 |                  | Structure, Accounting|                        |
 |                  | and Reporting        |                        |
 |------------------+----------------------+------------------------|
 |Mark Reese        | Hedging Basics , Risk| Swaps, Organization    |
 |                  | Management Inputs    | Structure              |
 |------------------+----------------------+------------------------|
 |Andy Lewis        | Swaps, Futures       | Hedging Basics,        |
 |                  |                      | Commodities            |
 |                  |                      | Fundamentals           |
 |------------------+----------------------+------------------------|
 | Dutch Quigley    | Options, Forwards    | Risk Management Inputs,|
 |                  |                      | Risk Identification    |
 |------------------+----------------------+------------------------|

Knowledge System Responsibilities for Content SMEs:
?	Develop content for one topic using web-based content entry tool (ECW)
?	Review content in topic(s) developed by other resources
?	Suggest/review graphic designs for these topics
?	Work with Monica Brown to develop and review practice exercises for topic(s)
?	Work with Monica Brown to develop and review associated expert story scripts for topic(s)

SME responsibilities for the Knowledge System will not include:
?	Selecting templates to use for each topic page. (Monica will develop each topic outline and associated templates 		prior to content development activities.)
?	Final selection of and incorporating graphics
?	Producing and incorporating media (expert stories)
?	Testing the topics

SME Process for Topic Development
1.	Receive weekly assignment via email from Accenture Normally on a Friday and due the next Friday.
2.	Develop content in the ECW (on-line development tool) or in Windows word and send to Monica. The former is more efficient then the latter, which may slow down the project.
3.	Describe graphic requirements when necessary in the ECW
4.	Save data in the ECW
5.	Respond to email from RM simulation team confirming completion of your weekly assignment by Friday of that week
6.	Periodically meet with RM sim team to develop/review exercises and expert stories
7. 	Receive assignment status reports
Continue this process through the duration of the Content Development Phase

Finally and most importantly, please keep in mind that the completion of
these assignments significantly impacts the ability of our BRM Deal
to stay on schedule and within budget. If you are unable to complete an
assignment for a given week, please notify me & Accenture ahead of time and
provide a date for when you will complete the assignment.

Again, Thanks for providing your expertise to this deal and I look forward as usual for us to exceed the mark as this is the Enron way.

Cheers
Kirk


Reservation status has changed to CONFIRMED. See attachment.

ASSIGNMENT_REF = 30981
SELLER_CODE = AZPS
SELLER_DUNS = 958982563
CUSTOMER_CODE = EPMI
CUSTOMER_DUNS = 848921276
AFFILIATE_FLAG = 0
PATH_NAME = W/AZPS/AZPS-AZPS/FOURCORNE345 - PNPKAPS230//
POINT_OF_RECEIPT = FOURCORNE345
POINT_OF_DELIVERY = PNPKAPS230
SOURCE = FOURCORNERS
SINK = PNPK
CAPACITY = 25
CAPACITY_REQUESTED = 25
SERVICE_INCREMENT = HOURLY
TS_CLASS = FIRM
TS_TYPE = POINT_TO_POINT
TS_PERIOD = OFF_PEAK
TS_WINDOW = FIXED
TS_SUBCLASS = WHEEL
NERC_CURTAILMENT_PRIORITY = Nerc Priority 1
OTHER_CURTAILMENT_PRIORITY = Default
START_TIME = 06/26/2002
STOP_TIME = 06/26/2002
CEILING_PRICE = 3.13
OFFER_PRICE = 3.13
BID_PRICE = 3.13
PRICE_UNITS = $/mW
PRECONFIRMED = YES
ANC_SVC_LINK = N/A
ANC_SVC_REQ = N/A
POSTING_REF = 0
SALE_REF =
REQUEST_REF =
DEAL_REF =
NEGOTIATED_PRICE_FLAG =
STATUS = CONFIRMED
STATUS_NOTIFICATION = lisa.gang@enron.com
STATUS_COMMENTS =
TIME_QUEUED = 06/25/2002
RESPONSE_TIME_LIMIT =
TIME_OF_LAST_UPDATE = 06/25/2002
PRIMARY_PROVIDER_COMMENTS =
SELLER_COMMENTS =
CUSTOMER_COMMENTS = For info call (503)464-5070
SELLER_NAME = AZPS
SELLER_PHONE = 602.250.1128
SELLER_FAX = 602.250.1155
SELLER_EMAIL = oasisadm@apsc.com
CUSTOMER_NAME = Enron Power Marketing, Inc.
CUSTOMER_PHONE = (713)853-3801
CUSTOMER_FAX = (713)646-8272
CUSTOMER_EMAIL = bill.rust@enron.com
REASSIGNED_REF = 0
REASSIGNED_CAPACITY = 0
REASSIGNED_START_TIME =
REASSIGNED_STOP_TIME =


I'll talk to you in the morning.  Sara

	Melissa Ann Murphy
	12/21/2000 04:47 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: NRG Power Marketing

Hi Sara, Tom May would like to send NRG a draft tomorrow.  He wants to leave
the Premium payment date blank for now.
I have made a few changes that he requested.

Thanks,
Melissa


We need some advice on this one - we are not in any negotiation with Altra
now and anything we were talking about is under a Confidentiality.

Andy needs some advice on how to pursue - obviously it helps them to say the
haven't been left out of the loop.  Andy will fill more in.

---------------------- Forwarded by Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT on 04/08/2000
08:36 ---------------------------
From: Rahil Jafry on 04/08/2000 08:32
To: Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andy Zipper/Corp/Enron@Enron,
David.Forster@enron.com, Dave Samuels/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Enron moves make waves in electronic trading industry.(Brief ...

Once again, Altra is clueless....

Enron moves make waves in electronic trading industry.(Brief
Article)(Statistical Data Included)
Monica Perin

07/21/2000
Houston Business Journal
11
Copyright 2000 Information Access Company. All rights reserved.
COPYRIGHT 2000 American City Business Journals, Inc.

  Leading online platform signs agreements with HoustonStreet Exchange
and True Quote

  EnronOnline, Enron Corp.'s giant online platform,, has made the first
Commodity in what may become a consolidation of competing electronic
trading exchanges in the energy industry.

  Enron Net Works, the division which operates EnronOnline, last week
signed cooperative agreements with HoustonStreet Exchange and True quote
LLC.

  And industry sources confirm that EnronOnline is negotiating similar
deals with several other exchanges, including Houston-based Altra Energy
Technologies and RedMeteor, as well as e-Speed, an exchange backed by
Dynegy and, Williams.

  HoustonStreet Exchange, headquartered in Portsmouth, N.H., was
recently ranked among the top 20 dependent energy exchanges by AMR
Research, a Boston consulting firm which put Altra in first place.

  True Quote, based in Louisville, Ky.,  a startup trading platform
being developed by APB Energy -- an over-the-counter brokerage firm --
along with PG&E National Energy Group, EnForm Technology and Microsoft
Corp.

  EnronOnline is the world largest commodity trading platform, but users
an only trade with Enron. Rather than being a true trading exchange,
industry insiders describe it as simply an online extension of Enron's
business.

  But in EnronOnline's first six months of operation after being
launched last November, the value of transactions conducted on the,
system surpassed $50 billion at a rate of $1.5 billion a day. The
platform offers trading in a wide variety of commodities, from most
forms of energy to bandwidth and paper

  MORE EYEBALLS

  The agreements EnronOnline has struck will enable the company to post
the prices at which it will buy or sell natural gas and electricity on
HousonStreet.com and TrueQuote.com Neither HoustonStreet nor TrueQuote
prices, however, will appear on EnronOnline. Customers on those two
sites who click on an Enron quote will be instantly linked to
EnronOnline, where the trades will take place.

  "As Louise (Kitchen, president of EnronOnline) said, extending their
pricing to more eyeballs will build more transaction volume for Enron,"
says Paul Bourke, president of Altra. "The question is whether it will
build volume for the other exchanges.

  "We are talking to Enron," Bourke adds. "We are intrigued, and we are
attempting understand what the business benefits to Altra would be."

  He says an Enron-Altra deal would be "more complicated" than those
involving other exchanges because of Altra's significant liquidity in
natural gas. Altra is the leader in online natural gas trading.

  While none of the exchanges would reveal what, if any, financial terms
are involved in the agreements--other than to say there is no sharing of
commissions --Bourke says he expects that if Altra and Enron finalize an
agreement, Enron would take a small equity position in Altra. He
speculates that this is what Enron did with HoustonStreet.

  Brian Pieri, vice president of Red Meteor, says the value of
EnronOnline to the other exchanges is that "they bring' tight-bid
offers, which is something the exchanges have to work hard on. And more
people will make the bid offers even tighter."

  This means buy and sell prices are close together, which helps market
liquidity.

  Asked if the additional liquidity and trading volume that Enron might
bring to the other exchanges wouldn't just further fragment the market,
Pieri compared the whole online trading scene to a sixth-grade dance.

  "The boys are all on one side of the room and the girls are on the
other side, and nobody is dancing. Somebody has to start and then
everybody else joins in. Enron brings more validity to this very new
situation," Pied says.

  "All of the exchanges are trying to build liquidity, of which Enron is
the king," says Bill Swanton, an analyst with AMR Research.

  Swanton predicts that the energy exchanges will consolidate within the
next six to eight months, and the ultimate surviving exchanges will not
be owned by any single player.

  "You need an independent exchange. I can't imagine Enron will end up
running it. The trading community won't be satisfied with that," he
says.

  Swanton points out, however, that Enron "will attract attention they
don't want if they force, some of these guys out of business."

  But HoustonStreet's CEO, Frank Getman, takes a different view of what
the Enron deals mean.

  "Web-based energy trading exchanges are no longer about liquidity,
thanks to these EnronOnline data deals," he says. "The game is now about
functionality and value-added services."

Folder Name: Rahil Jafry
Relevance Score on Scale of 100: 97

______________________________________________________________________

To review or revise your folder, visit http://www.djinteractive.com or
contact Dow Jones Customer Service by e-mail at custom.news@bis.dowjones.com
or by phone at 800-369-7466. (Outside the U.S. and Canada, call 609-452-1511
or contact your local sales representative.)
______________________________________________________________________

Copyright (c) 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved


This request has been pending your approval for  3 days.  Please click http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000081220&Page=Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000081220
Request Create Date : 1/17/02 3:03:38 PM
Requested For       : winston.jia@enron.com
Resource Name       : Enpower North America West Production Adhoc_Read
Resource Type       : Applications


Mr. Cates, sir, would you please approve of the attached expense report?  You
are a kind and generous man.


Steve:

1.   Attached is a clean version of the May 31st draft of the exhibits (rev 5
) and a comparison to Rev 3.  The documents have been prepared by Peter.
Soome of the exhibits have data unique to Longview in particular

A
A-1
B-3
B-5
the N series.

2.  We need the following from GE

 a.  Electronics of the fuel spec for A-2
 b.  The electronics of the Scope of Supply for Exhibit B-1-  I think it is
the SOW in the agreement in principle for Longview.

3.  Exhibit B- Specification is being handled seperately and should be close
to complete.

4. We will need to plug in the Guaranteed Delivery Dates for Exhibit B-2.

5.  In Exhibit B-3 I based the output and heat specific performance guarantee
values on the Longview AIP contract price.   We need to bottom out the
exhaust energy and temperature LD's in Exhibit B-5 so I can calculate  the
associated specific performance values.

6.  Exhibit B-5  Liquidated Damages.  I need to draft some proposed Delay LD
language to deal with non- major components.  Once done and agreed I can
revise the example to fit.   Also need to bottom out the exhaust related
performance LD's.

7.  Exhibit E-   Need addresses.

8.  Exhibit F-  We are having Larry Lieb do quick review-

9.  Exhibit F-1-  Need to clarify who prepares the sound level test
procedures.  Need to understand the intent of the first sentence of the 3rd
paragraph of the 1st page and the 1st sentence of the 6th from last bullet.

10.  Exhibit F-2.   See bolded questions.

10. Exhibits I-    Will need to be fixed to the Longview deal for payment and
cancellation with appropriate marking as I-1 and I-2.  Steve-  We will need
to come up with more descriptive milestones other the "progress payment".
Need to fix notes under the cancellation schedule.

11. Exhibit M-1    Need pricing for spares for Longview.

12.  Exhibit M-2-   paragraph 1.   Need to address GE's responsibility for
more commissioning spares. Need to expand on the maintenance tools.

13.  Exhibit N-1 Price reconciliation needs review.

14.   Exhibit R.   Will modify intro so as to make it clear that these are
witness points and that additional witness points may be added during the QA
kick off meeting.

----- Forwarded by John G Rigby/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 06/05/2001 01:09 PM -----

	"Thompson, Peter J." <pthompson@akllp.com>
	05/31/2001 05:33 PM

		 To: "Sheila Tweed (E-mail)" <Sheila.Tweed@enron.com>, "Kay Mann (E-mail)"
<kay.mann@enron.com>, "John Rigby (E-mail)" <john.g.rigby@enron.com>, "Scott
Dieball (E-mail)" <scott.dieball@enron.com>, "Bill Williams (E-mail)"
<Bill.Williams@enron.com>, "Lisa Bills (E-mail)" <Lisa.Bills@enron.com>,
<eric.booth@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: World Hunger Form Exhibits

 Attached for your review is a clean copy of the World Hunger
Form Exhibits (second document below), which incorporates numerous
changes from John Rigby and Eric Booth as well as some clean up.  Also
attached hereto is a colored blackline (first document below) showing
the changes made to the last version of the exhibits sent to GE.
 <<World Hunger Form Exhibits - Blackline of 3 to 5.DOC>>  <<Exhibits to
Enron Turbine Form Agreement 5/29/01.DOC>>
 - World Hunger Form Exhibits - Blackline of 3 to 5.DOC
 - 01.DOC


I'm holding up just fine.  Thanks a bunch for caring.  Have a great time in
the Virgin Islands!  Is it a Survivor gig?

	Susan M Landwehr
	02/08/2001 07:52 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re:

We missed you too.  Everybody is kind of worried about you....and hoping that
you're holding out o.k..  Barbara wasn't able to make it and Marchris was
hanging out with Governor Jeb, so we had a smaller group.  I just got back to
Mpls and am heading off to the Virgin Islands on Saturday.

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	02/07/2001 07:04 PM

		 To: Donald Lassere/Enron Communications@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
		 cc: Barbara A Hueter/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jan Haizmann/LON/ECT@ECT, Jane
Wilson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Lara Leibman/NA/Enron@ENRON,
Marchris Robinson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Margo Reyna/NA/Enron@ENRON, Michael
Grimes/AP/Enron@ENRON, Mona L Petrochko/NA/Enron@ENRON, Ricardo
Charvel/NA/Enron@ENRON, Scott Bolton/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Stephen D Burns/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sue Nord/NA/Enron@ENRON,
Susan M Landwehr/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tracy Cooper/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications
		 Subject:

Just wanted to send a note to say that I'm very sorry that I couldn't make it
to the meeting, miss catching up with folks, and hope that all's going well.
Hope to see you very soon.

Best,
Jeff


HI Jon,

The IT guys do not know when we can begin scraping Tetco and Algonquin/Mar data today, but the moment it comes out I'll get the map down to you.  I don't quite understand the problem, but when we switched to a new server we lost some access rights that we originally had to dukes website.

I'll keep you updated.

adam


Not bad actually

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Calger, Christopher F.
Sent:	Wednesday, September 26, 2001 10:10 AM
To:	Kitchen, Louise
Subject:	Mexico Person?

Mike Miller - LJM
Strong relationship, asset and finance capabilities

Chris Calger
503-464-3735


John, great to hear that you are still doing the Lord's work on this case!
Sounds like you have things well in hand and that the appeal argument went
well.  Good luck on this one and please let me know how it turns out--in
fact, please send me a copy of the appellate decision when issued at this
email address or by mail at 1111 S. 103d St. Omaha Nebraska, 68124.  Thanks.
DF

"John Wyss" <JWyss@WRF.com> on 10/02/2000 12:52:31 PM
To: "pdondanville" <pdondanville%schiffhardin.com%smtp@wrf.com>
cc: "dhill" <dhill%bspmlaw.com%smtp@wrf.com>, "Christopher Hardee"
<CHardee@WRF.com>

Subject: MHP-Bath 2d Cir Argument

We argued the Bath appeal in the Second Circuit last Friday.  Bath's
counsel went first for 10 minutes; I was second for 8 minutes; Alan Knauf
was next for CREST for 2 minutes; David Connors took 2 minutes for TPC; and
Bath's counsel took the final 2 minutes for rebuttal.  The panel took the
matter under advisement when the argument was finished.

The panel was Judge Jacobs (who was on the recent Primetime 24 Joint
Venture case dealing with the "access barring" sham exception to Noerr-
Pennington), Judge Straub and Judge Sacks.  All three are from private
practice with large firms.

The argument went reasonably well, although the panel played it pretty
close to the vest.  Bath's counsel was not brilliant and received a lot of
hard questions from the bench.  The panel seemed to have no trouble with
the fact that the District Court reviewed the administrative record in
addition to the allegations in Bath's complaint.  They got close to getting
a concession from Bath's counsel that the complaint alleges damages from
long delays in the administrative process, which necessarily puts at issue
the overall course of the agency proceedings and requires the judge to
review the record.

The panel also seemed uninterested in Bath's argument that Noerr-Pennington
immunity only applies to antitrust cases.  The panel recognized that the
First Amendment protections must apply to all types of causes of action.

The biggest issue for the panel appeared to be the "fraud" sham exception
to Noerr-Pennington.  During argument, Bath's counsel suggested that, if
only he had discovery, he would be able to prove that MHP's experts had
"doctored" the geological data as part of submitting their fraudulent
affidavits.  I countered that this was the first we had ever heard of such
allegations, that they were never part of Bath's complaint, and that the
only allegation was that the expert's "opinions" were wrong and without
basis.

The court came back to the question of what to do if a party claims that
there has been clear fraud committed during the agency proceeding.  I
argued, and Judge Straub agreed, that such fraud is only relevant under the
case law if it goes to the very core of the proceeding and deprives it of
its legitimacy.  The district court's opinion establishes that noting like
that occurred here.

Finally, both I and David Connors argued that the lower court's alternative
proximate cause ruling was independently fatal to Bath's complaint, in that
the alleged "fraud", even if it had occurred, did not cause any of Bath's
alleged damages.

Please call me (202-719-7038) if you would like further details regarding
the argument.  Otherwise, we will just have to wait for the decision.


FYI - See rows 49-53; columns E-J for our group.

Kathleen
---------------------- Forwarded by Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron on 03/15/2001
04:49 PM ---------------------------

	Lorie Leigh @ ECT
	03/15/2001 04:44 PM

To: Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: FW: March Headcount

---------------------- Forwarded by Lorie Leigh/HOU/ECT on 03/15/2001 04:44
PM ---------------------------
From: Paula Harris/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/14/2001 06:11 PM
To: Tamara Jae Black/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christy Chapman/ENRON@enronXgate, Jewell
Wade/ENRON@enronXgate, Claudette Harvey/ENRON@enronXgate, Chaun
Roberts/NA/Enron@Enron, Lorie Leigh/HOU/ECT@ECT, Claudia
Guerra/NA/Enron@ENRON, Lisa Shoemake/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Ricardo Guerra/ENRON@enronXgate
Subject: FW: March Headcount

I received a report from HR and it appears there is conflicting information
regarding some of the titles for various employees.  Please verify that the
titles are correct for everyone in your group.  The ones that I made changes
to are in red.

Thanks, Paula.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Harris, Paula
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 9:41 AM
To: Black, Tamara Jae; Chapman, Christy; Wade, Jewell; Harvey, Claudette;
Roberts, Chaun; Leigh, Lorie; Guerra, Claudia; Shoemake, Lisa
Cc: Guerra, Ricardo
Subject: FW: March Headcount

I formatted the file so that it would print on one legal size sheet.  Please
use this new file as opposed to the one I sent earlier.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Harris, Paula
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 9:27 AM
To: Black, Tamara Jae; Chapman, Christy; Wade, Jewell; Harvey, Claudette;
Roberts, Chaun; Leigh, Lorie; Guerra, Claudia; Shoemake, Lisa
Cc: Guerra, Ricardo
Subject: March Headcount

Please review the attached org chart for March and submit any changes by noon
tomorrow.  It is imperative that all of the information on the attached file
is accurate, including titles, as this information is being given directly to
John Lavorato and Louise Kitchen.

Thanks, Paula.


I corrected my fax number and email address as the contact person on  these
six data requests.

>>> <KBeniga@SCHWABE.com>  03/14/01 05:05PM >>>
Attached please find data requests SL-SP:001 -  SL-SP:006.

?????

Kelly C.  Beniga
kbeniga @ schwabe.com
(503)  796-2445

NOTICE:? This communication  may contain privileged or other confidential
information. If you are not the  intended recipient or believe that you may
have received this communication in  error,? please reply to the sender
indicating that fact and delete the copy  you received.? In addition, you
should not print, copy,? retransmit,  disseminate, or otherwise use the
information.?????? Thank you.

 - SL-SP-001.doc
 - SL-SP-002.doc
 - SL-SP-003.doc
 - SL-SP-004.doc
 - SL-SP-005.doc
 - SL-SP-006.doc


Attached is a memorandum outlining my understanding of the project that we
have been asked to take on by Lisa Mellencamp and Linklaters.

Lisa and Richard, I would very much appreciate your reviewing the attached
memorandum and giving me your comments.? I want to make sure we are on the
right track.

 <<3__KX01!.doc>>

This e-mail message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee
or agent responsible for delivery of this message to the intended
recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail message is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify
the sender and delete this e-mail message from your computer.

 - 3__KX01!.doc


---------------------- Forwarded by Sandra F Brawner/HOU/ECT on 03/20/2001
03:54 PM ---------------------------

"Pamela Anderson" <pama9@flash.net> on 03/11/2001 09:14:06 PM
To: "Sandra Brawner" <Sandra.F.Brawner@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Fw: Fw: TEXAS Remedy for Choking]

Return-Path: <pdwells@scottsboro.org>
Received: from  rly-zc05.mx.aol.com (rly-zc05.mail.aol.com [172.31.33.5]) by
air-zc05.mail.aol.com (v77_r1.21) with ESMTP; Sat, 03 Mar 2001 12:06:54 -0500
Received: from  mail1.scottsboro.org (kirk.scottsboro.org [12.21.132.15]) by
rly-zc05.mx.aol.com (v77_r1.21) with ESMTP; Sat, 03 Mar 2001 12:06:29 -0500
Received: from Default (nat3com.scottsboro.org [12.21.132.29]) by
mail1.scottsboro.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id KAA19554; Sat, 3 Mar 2001
10:59:00 -0600
Message-ID: <005e01c0a405$a62e0740$fdc9a8c0@scottsboro.org>
From: "Pat Wells" <pdwells@scottsboro.org>
To: "Don Parmer" <innessfree@aol.com>,        "Danisha and Kerry Jacobson"
<thejs8@juno.com>,        "Debbie and Charlie" <cddc3@home.com>,        "Gene
and Kellie Bazemore" <KBaze@aol.com>,        "Terri and Terry"
<tthweatt@murray-ky.net>,        "Rachel Singletary"
<singl2630@aol.com>,        "Mary and Randy Lowe"
<LOWESHODLE@aol.com>,        "'Paul & Laura'" <p-ljacobson@home.com>
Subject: Fw: TEXAS Remedy for Choking]
Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2001 11:16:13 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_005B_01C0A3D3.5B5073C0"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600

This came from our friends out near Houston........
P.W.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Anne & Danny" <annendan@earthlink.net>
To: "Pam Plesko" <pplesko1@juno.com>; "Pat Wells" <pdwells@scottsboro.org>;
"Deanna Woodson" <woodson12@juno.com>; "babs flowers"
<lbflowers@sydcom.net>; "Trish Maxie" <theback40@msn.com>; "Sandie Diamond"
<shdiamond@mcia.com>
Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2001 8:02 AM
Subject: Fw: TEXAS Remedy for Choking]

>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "terri Skipper" <ronnienterri@mindspring.com>;
<tskip@mindspring.com>
> To: <lotus476@aol.com>
> Cc: "Anne & Danny" <annendan@earthlink.net>
> Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2001 5:36 PM
> Subject: Fw: TEXAS Remedy for Choking]
>
>
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: <CARGOMOODY@aol.com>
> > To: <plantation@ala.net>; <ronnienterri@mindspring.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2001 3:12 PM
> > Subject: Fwd: TEXAS Remedy for Choking]
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > <<
> > >  > >    >Two cowboys from Texas walk into a roadhouse to
> > >  > wash the trail
> > >  > >dust
> > >  > >    >from their throats. They stand at the bar,
> > >  > drinking a beer and
> > >  > >talking
> > >  > >about
> > >  > >    >current cattle prices.  Suddenly, a woman at a
> > >  > nearby table,
> > >  > >who is eating
> > >  > >a
> > >  > >    >sandwich, begins to cough. After a minute or so,
> > >  > it becomes
> > >  > >apparent that
> > >  > >    >she is in real distress.
> > >  > >    >
> > >  > >    >One of the cowboys looks at her and say, "Kin ya
> > >  > swaller?" The
> > >  > >woman shakes
> > >  > >her head, no.
> > >  > >"Kin ya breathe?"  The woman begins to turn blue
> > >  > and shakes her head.
> > >  > >    >
> > >  > >    >The cowboy walks over to the woman, lifts up the
> > >  > back of her
> > >  > >dress, yanks
> > >  > >    >down her panties, and slowly runs his tongue from
> > >  > the back of
> > >  > >her thigh up
> > >  > >    >to the small of her back. The woman is so
> > >  > shocked, that she has
> > >  > >a violent
> > >  > >spasm
> > >  > >    >and the obstruction flies out of her mouth.
> > >  > >    >
> > >  > >    >As she begins to breathe again, the cowboy walks
> > >  > slowly back to
> > >  > >the bar
> > >  > >    >and takes a drink from his beer.  His partner
> > >  > says, "Ya know,
> > >  > >I'd
> > >  > >    >heard of that there "Hind Lick maneuver, but I
> > >  > ain't never seen
> > >  > >nobody do
> > >  > >    >it. >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Return-Path: <moodyredick@yahoo.com>
Received: from  rly-xd02.mx.aol.com (rly-xd02.mail.aol.com [172.20.105.167])
by air-xd04.mail.aol.com (v77_r1.21) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Mar 2001 09:18:58
-0500
Received: from  web10202.mail.yahoo.com (web10202.mail.yahoo.com
[216.136.130.66]) by rly-xd02.mx.aol.com (v77_r1.21) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Mar
2001 09:18:37 -0500
Message-ID: <20010301141836.92377.qmail@web10202.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [208.2.25.164] by web10202.mail.yahoo.com; Thu, 01 Mar 2001
06:18:36 PST
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2001 06:18:36 -0800 (PST)
From: Sharon Redick <moodyredick@yahoo.com>
Subject: TEXAS Remedy for Choking]
To: Lynn Boyd <pooh2@graceba.net>, Glenda Moody <cargomoody@aol.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version)

This is awful!!

(Mama--thought Terri Skipper might enjoy it!)

SR

> > >Two cowboys from Texas walk into a roadhouse to
> wash the trail
> >dust
> > >from their throats. They stand at the bar,
> drinking a beer and
> >talking
> >about
> > >current cattle prices.  Suddenly, a woman at a
> nearby table,
> >who is eating
> >a
> > >sandwich, begins to cough. After a minute or so,
> it becomes
> >apparent that
> > >she is in real distress.
> > >
> > >One of the cowboys looks at her and say, "Kin ya
> swaller?" The
> >woman shakes
> >her head, no.
> >"Kin ya breathe?"  The woman begins to turn blue
> and shakes her head.
> > >
> > >The cowboy walks over to the woman, lifts up the
> back of her
> >dress, yanks
> > >down her panties, and slowly runs his tongue from
> the back of
> >her thigh up
> > >to the small of her back. The woman is so
> shocked, that she has
> >a violent
> >spasm
> > >and the obstruction flies out of her mouth.
> > >
> > >As she begins to breathe again, the cowboy walks
> slowly back to
> >the bar
> > >and takes a drink from his beer.  His partner
> says, "Ya know,
> >I'd
> > >heard of that there "Hind Lick maneuver, but I
> ain't never seen
> >nobody do
> > >it.
> > >
> >
>
>_________________________________________________________________
> >Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
> http://explorer.msn.com
> ><http://explorer.msn.com>
> >
> >
> >
>
>
_________________________________________________________________
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
> http://explorer.msn.com
>
>
>

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/


i should be here most of this week unless i get called up to NY city. If i
make it down to houston will call you. I had an old GE Capital friend over
for dinner this week with his family. Tom Kalb works at Enron now and lives
around the corner from me. Not sure what group he is, he seemed to suggest
he just got transferred and is now in some finance group. take care. charlie

----- Original Message -----
From: <Benjamin.Rogers@enron.com>
To: "Charles Costenbader" <charles@capstoneenergy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2000 4:00 PM
Subject: Re:

>
> Charlie:
> Sorry for the delay with the e-mail, I just got back into the office from
> traveling.  We are working hard to sell these assets before year-end -
> they're a beast.  This Friday does not look good for lunch, but I think
> Tuesday or Wednesday of next week works.  I hope this works for you as
> well.  Talk to you soon.
> Regards,
> Ben
>


Please forward to me your schedules for next Monday through Wednesday of next
week...

Please send to me no later than Monday morning, December 4th.

Thanks in advance for your cooperation.

Joseph Alamo
Sr. Administrative Assistant
Government Affairs - The Americas
San Francisco CA


Here it is


I spoke with Dale Neuner (confirm desk) a few minutes ago.  It seems that
Scott Neal sent the deal ticket to EI and not ECT.  We have retrieved the
ticket and Dale is talking to Scott about having the deal entered into trade
capture.  Dale is in touch with Brent and will advise when deal has been
entered.  SS

From: "Julian Poole/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT" AT ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@CCMAIL on
07/26/99 04:07 PM
To: Sara Shackleton@ECT, Brent Hendry AT ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@CCMAIL
cc: "Don Black/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT" AT ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@CCMAIL
Subject: SWAP

Sara,

Was the confirmation sent to C. Puerto?

Julian


Hi Edie,

Can you add these slides to the Texas Gas Plan Presentation for 2001 behind
pg. 10.

Call with questions.

Thanks,

Eric
x3-0977
---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 02/12/2001 04:34 PM
---------------------------

Bruce Sukaly@ENRON
02/12/2001 04:31 PM
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Slides

Have Edie attach these to Tom's presentation.


We have spoken to UAE's Bankers who have informed us that they do not wish for us (and our partner Covanta) to continue into Round 2.   Obviously bad news, but better to be out now rather than after 6 weeks of intensive due diligence.   If you'd like more details on why we fell short, feel free to give me a call.

thanks,
Jeff

Jeffrey M. Bartlett
Director, Enron Americas
713-853-562
jeff.bartlett@enron.com


I don't know the terms under which it has been submitted by VEPCO,  but we
can certainly request that it be treated as such.

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2000 12:23 PM
To: Duncan, Allyson
Subject: RE: CPCN public information

This information is helpful.  Is the draft of the PPA submitted by VEPCO
confidential?

Thanks,

Kay

"Duncan, Allyson" <aduncan@kilstock.com> on 09/19/2000 11:07:28 AM

To:   "'Kay.Mann@enron.com'" <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject:  RE: CPCN public information

The Application itself is public.  The testimony is public.  Without going
back through the material we have supplied (which I would be happy to do,
if
you like), the primary material that was confidential was the cost data and
supporting work papers.  Also, the engineering plan we filed recently in
response to a data request was confidential.

Let me know if you would like me to walk back through it more specifically.

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2000 12:03 PM
To: aduncan@kilstock.com
Subject: CPCN public information

Hi Allyson,

Someone was asking which of the information we have filed is public
information.  Is the petition itself public?  What else would be public?

I know this is a variation to the "what is confidential" question. Once
again, your assistance is appreciated.

Kay


Dan,

Attached redline contract compares changes we discussed today to the
document I sent you yesterday.  If changes are acceptable, I will send the
contract to WPS for their review.

Thanks!
Kim

Gas Supply Consulting, Inc.
(281)558-0735
kdecell@gassupplyconsulting.com

 - WPS Enron 3 mo ANR Swing 12-8-00 COMPARE 12-6-00.doc


Put the West desk down for 5 people.

DG    3-9573
---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 10/12/2000
03:24 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Darron C Giron                           10/12/2000 09:38 AM

To: Patrick Ryder/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: Paint ball

The date is good for the West desk.  I will forward a headcount later today.

DG    3-9573


The following contracts are now available on Livelink.

Contract #			Counterparty				Contract Type
96079908			Lexco Data Systems, Inc.		Administrative or Other (Geographic Site License Agmt)

96068933			Martin Twist Energy Co. L.L.C.		Master Purchase Firm & Spot


I'm sure she had things put together well.

-----Original Message-----
From: Ward, Sharon [mailto:sharonward@akllp.com]
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 9:45 AM
To: Mann, Kay
Subject: RE: Ces lease/USTELENET DMS

Kay,

I think it was around 3p.m. on Saturday.  His name is Charles (Charlie).
His middle name is something like Coudair (sp?).  Tammy has been working
on making lists and folders of all of her outstanding matters, so
hopefully we are ready to make the transition.

Sherry

-----Original Message-----
From: Mann, Kay [mailto:Kay.Mann@ENRON.com]
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 9:40 AM
To: Ward, Sharon
Subject: RE: Ces lease/USTELENET DMS

I called her office and they told me.  What time Friday?  What's his
name?

Do you have a handle on what she was working on?  I wouldn't want to
bother her about anything.

Kay

-----Original Message-----
From: Ward, Sharon [mailto:sharonward@akllp.com]
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 9:37 AM
To: Mann, Kay
Subject: RE: Ces lease/USTELENET DMS

Thanks Kay.  I've call off the dogs.   I guess you know that Tammy had
her baby on Friday - 5lbs. 14oz!

-----Original Message-----
From: Mann, Kay [mailto:Kay.Mann@ENRON.com]
Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2001 9:01 PM
To: Ward, Sharon
Subject: RE: Ces lease/USTELENET DMS

I received word that the switch deal is off. Thanks anyway.
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient
(or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender
or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and
delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments
hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not
create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron
Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other
party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by
estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


i wish i could go every day.  i could live on it.  we will go some time.


It sounds like it may be a little while before the IT group gets the final
approval to move the web site to the outside.  In the mean time, is it worth
while to send Sullivan&Cromwell print outs of the pages?  Right now there is
not really much info on the site.  We can identify third party links, the
type of information we will be providing as well as sources for our data.
Will this be of use?

Mike

To: Michael Etringer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: West Power Customer Web SIte

I have been able to access this but our outside legal counsel (Sullivan &
Cromwell in NY) can't.  Any way for them to get access so they can advise us
on this?  They are also the guys who will help with a training session on
various legal issues and company policies in trading.

Michael Etringer

01/14/2000 05:00 PM

To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: West Power Customer Web SIte

Mark,

As discussed, here is the URL for the proposed web site:
http://ecthou-lndev1.nt.ect.enron.com/westpowernet.nsf/
It is still on an internal server which I hope you will have access to.  Let
me know if it doesn't work.

The User ID is: "user1"  and the Password is:  "test"  .

I also ran through several of the web sites from which we gather our
information and did not run across the occurance of any copyright statements.

In terms of timing, we hope to release the site by the end of January to a
limited customer listing.

Regards,
Mike Etringer
503-464-3836


If you cannot read today's e-Journal, please visit this link:  <http://www.michbar.org/e-journal/112101.html> Or to receive a plain text version, please send an e-mail to lyris@lists.michbar.org  In the body, type:  unsubscribe ejournal and on the next line type:  subscribe ejournal-text


i try to be.  what do you want me to be boring like you sir?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Wednesday, November 21, 2001 1:07 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

your very funny

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Wednesday, November 21, 2001 1:04 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

whoopie!!!!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Wednesday, November 21, 2001 1:04 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

aga just came out

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Wednesday, November 21, 2001 1:02 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:

what are you doing?


Kay:  I spoke to Chuck today.  He did not come up with any "fatal flaws".  He
said he would drop you a quick note over the weekend regarding the security
interest/termination mechanics.  I hope that all is well.  John

Kay.Mann@enron.com> 03/13/01 09:23AM >>>
Hi John,

I still need a Connecticut lawyer to look at this.  Do you have someone
available?  I need input by Monday, March 19. Nothing comprehensive, just a
fatal flaw analysis under Connecticut law.

Thanks,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/13/2001 08:21
AM ---------------------------

Kay Mann
12/11/2000 06:57 AM

To:   jklauber@llgm.com
cc:   Heather Kroll/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject:

Hi John,

I'm attaching the current draft of the contract under which we will be able
to buy the Fuel Cell equipment for use on projects in Connecticut.  The
contract will likely be a Connecticut law contract.  Could you have someone
give it a fatal flaw check, or should I use Connecticut counsel?

One issue which is nagging me is their request for a security interest in
the equipment, as I think this might complicate financing.  I assume that
an equipment supplier has certain lien rights under Connecticut law anyway.
Can you have this verified?  I only want the simplest of explanations.

Thanks,

Kay

---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 12/11/2000 06:52
AM ---------------------------

"Scheib, Jacqueline Pennino" <jscheib@rc.com> on 11/17/2000 10:26:09 PM

To:   "'kay.mann@enron.com'" <kay.mann@enron.com>, "Jerry Leitman (E-mail)"
<jleitman@fce.com>, "Ross M. Levine (E-mail)" <rlevine@fce.com>
cc:   "Sellay, William" <WSELLAY@RC.com>

Subject:

<<jgtk01!.DOC>>  <<RED FUELCELL AGR.DOC>>
--------------------------------------------------
Jacqueline Pennino Scheib, Esq.
Robinson & Cole LLP
280 Trumbull Street
Hartford, CT  06103
(p) 860-275-8285
(f) 860-275-8299
jscheib@rc.com

(See attached file: jgtk01!.DOC)
(See attached file: RED FUELCELL AGR.DOC)

"This e-mail, including attachments, contains information that is
confidential and it may be protected by the attorney/client or other
privileges.  This e-mail, including attachments, constitutes non-public
information intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s).  If
you are not an intended recipient, please delete this e-mail, including
attachments and notify me by return mail, e-mail or by phone at 212
424-8125.  The unauthorized use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction
of the e-mail, including attachments, is prohibited and may be unlawful.

John Klauberg
LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae, L.L.P.
212 424-8125
jklauber@llgm.com


Great.  Probably Mike, me, Rick Bergsieker and a few others.  Thanks.  Jeff

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Clayton Seigle                           11/16/2000 10:11 AM

To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: saudi

i'm in nyc at a conference, and yesterday there was an excellent presentation
on foreign investment in saudi arabia.  please let me know if anyone in EGM
should be briefed on what was said there.

thanks


Attached is Steve Kean's presentation.

Are you available for lunch with Steve on Monday, January 8th?  Please give
me a call at 3-1808 and we can get you on Steve's calendar.

     Maureen McVicker
     Steve's Assistant


Call-in Information for today's Circuit Breaker Meeting:

     Dial In #:     (734) 414-0269

     Participant #: 194784

A brief agenda and notes taken from the last meeting are attached.

(See attached file: Meeting Agenda 12-1.doc)  (See attached file: CB Issues
Resolution.doc)

 - Meeting Agenda 12-1.doc
 - CB Issues Resolution.doc


Here are Reliant's comments.

thanks
brant

 -----Original Message-----
From:  mwong@reliantenergy.com@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-mwong+40reliantenergy+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2001 4:38 PM
To: Reves, Brant
Subject: RE: gty status

Mark W Wong
02/27/2001 11:07 AM

To:   brant.reves@enron.com
cc:

Subject:  Re: Comments to guaranty formats

(See attached file: ENE-JV Guaranty Format.doc)
(See attached file: TEX-JV Guaranty Format.doc)
 - ENE-JV Guaranty Format.doc
 - TEX-JV Guaranty Format.doc


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/30/2001
05:19 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Jason Sokolov                           04/30/2001 05:02 PM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Energy Derivatives Project Tracy Pan Part 3

---------------------- Forwarded by Jason Sokolov/HOU/ECT on 04/30/2001 05:02
PM ---------------------------

Tracy Pan <pcp@pop.ruf.rice.edu> on 04/30/2001 11:10:36 AM
Please respond to pcp@rice.edu
To: Jason.Sokolov@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Energy Derivatives Project Tracy Pan Part 3

-----Original Message-----
From: Jason.Sokolov@enron.com [mailto:Jason.Sokolov@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 8:16 AM
To: pcp@rice.edu
Subject: Re: About the Energy Derivative Project

Tracy,
Break it down into 8000 files of 1 kB, and send each one in a separate
mail.

Just kidding!
Try to send the whole thing.
If one of the servers refuses to accept it, then break it down into several
pieces.
I know for sure that I can take files as large as 2MB.

Jason

 - 665 Team Project--Tracy Pan Part 3.xls


Enron in Action has a new format!  In the future, you will be able to access Enron in Action through the new Community Relations web site at  http://cr.enron.com and find out all of the information you have grown accustomed to.  In this week's issue you will find out information regarding:

Enron Happenings
Community Relations Announces new interactive web site
Wild@Work Brown Bag - Spring Migration - Crossing the Gulf in a Single Leap
Win A $1000 Donation To Your Favorite Charity

Volunteer Opportunities
United Way Day of Caring
Crossroads: Mentor a Troubled Child

Please go to  http://cr.enron.com/eia.html to access this week's Enron in Action.  In addition, Enron in Action is available through a channel on my.home.enron.com.  To add this channel to your set-up click on the channels link at the top of the screen and under announcements check the Enron in Action box.

If you wish to add an announcement to Enron in Action, please fill out the attached form below and submit it to eia@enron.com no later than 12 PM Thursday each week.


This is it.  I am leaving the office for the rest of the morning.  I will return after lunch.

DG


Steve and Rick:  I attempted to strengthen the latest draft of the
Stakeholder letter per your instructions on our most recent conference call.
Unfortunately, we have pushed to the point that APPA, the consumer groups and
most utilities will no longer sign the letter per their e-mail below.  It now
looks like no letter will be sent.  If you would like, Enron, EPSA, ELCON and
ACC only can send a revised stronger letter or alternatively, just bag the
idea.  The utilities are split not wishing to let APPA appear more reliable
then them.  I will forward the MidAmerican letter for your files which does
support our position per my request.  I feel it is unfortunate that now APPA
will send a strong support letter instead of signing our modified version.
Per his request, I will meet with Congressman Wynn's Chief of Staff next week
upon his return from vacation to discuss their strategy.   thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Cynthia Sandherr/Corp/Enron on 08/22/2000
05:16 PM ---------------------------

"Cirrincione, Jane" <JCirrincione@APPAnet.org> on 08/21/2000 05:05:01 PM
To: "Cirrincione, Jane" <JCirrincione@APPAnet.org>, "Kanner, Marty"
<mkanner@kannerandassoc.com>, "'Adrienne Hahn (E-mail)'"
<hhnadr@consumer.org>, "'Andrea Spring (E-mail)'" <aae@dellnet.com>,
"'Barbara Burchett (E-mail)'" <bburchet@wrf.com>, "'Bill Libro (E-mail)'"
<blibro@mnpower.com>, "'Charlie Acquard (E-mail)'" <cacquard@erols.com>,
"'Cindy Bogorad (E-mail)'" <BogoradC@spiegelmcd.com>, "'Cynthia Sandherr
(E-mail)'" <csandhe@enron.com>, "'David Keane (E-mail)'" <dnke@dynegy.com>,
"'Deborah Sliz (E-mail)'" <dsliz@morganmeguire.com>, "'Donn Salvosa
(E-mail)'" <dsalvosa@epsa.org>, Front Desk <office@kannerandassoc.com>, "'Gay
Friedmann (E-mail)'" <gfriedmann@ingaa.org>, "'Gene Peters (E-mail)'"
<gpeters@epsa.org>, "'Glenn R. Etienne (E-mail)'" <gret@dynegy.com>, "'Glenn
R. Etienne (Business Fax)'"
<IMCEAFAX-Glenn+20R+2E+20Etienne+40+2B1+20+28713+29+20507-6834@kannerandassoc>
, "'Jeff Kramer (E-mail)'" <JKRAMER@aarp.org>, "'Jim Bruce (E-mail)'"
<jbruce@wrf.com>, "'Jim McVaney (E-mail)'"
<jim_mcvaney@americanchemistry.com>, "Nipper, Joe" <JNipper@APPAnet.org>,
"'John Anderson (E-mail)'" <janderson@elcon.org>, "'John Sparkman (E-mail)'"
<jssparkman@pplweb.com>, "'Katie Cullen (E-mail)'" <kculleniwsa@aol.com>,
"White, Kristina" <ktwhite@kannerandassoc.com>, "'Larry Bruneel (E-mail)'"
<Larry.Bruneel@wepco.com>, "'Mark Cooper (E-mail)'" <MarkCooper@aol.com>,
"'Mark Yacker (E-mail)'" <myacker@elcon.org>, "Nolan, Michael"
<MNolan@APPAnet.org>, "'Paulette Pidcock (E-mail)'"
<paulette.pidcock@pge-corp.com>, "'Rhod Shaw (E-mail)'"
<rshaw@alpinegroup.com>, "'Tobyn Anderson (E-mail)'"
<tanderson@lighthouse-energy.com>, "'Tom Hill (E-mail)'"
<thomas.hill@pge-corp.com>
cc:

Subject: Stakeholder Reliability Letter

While we have been actively involved in the editing process for a
stakeholder letter on reliability, I am writing to let you know of growing
concern among APPA's membership that the draft stakeholder reliability
letter still does not go far enough in representing our association's
position in support of stand-alone reliability legislation in the absence of
a comprehensive restructuring measure.  While we know the draft was intended
only to be kept in our "back pocket" for use if needed later in the session,
we would not be able to endorse sending the letter in any event unless it
was substantially strengthened to directly indicate support for a
stand-alone reliability measure.  Because it has become clear during the
editing process that the group cannot arrive at consensus on that point, we
would like to suggest that the group opt not to send such a letter, but
instead have our individual organizations write their own letters that more
accurately reflect their support or opposition on the question of
stand-alone reliability.  Thank you for your consideration.  Jane.
>

**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager at postmaster@APPAnet.org.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept
for the presence of computer viruses.

**********************************************************************


Joe -
Thanks for the Flowers!  My question is more for how you are doing . . .  I
keep
leaving your number here at work which is why I have not called.  In fact I
even
deleted the last email you sent me so I have lost it completely.

You know if you ever need a break - I am only 3 hrs. and you are more than
welcome to come visit.

Talk to you soon -

Ang


Hi Folks,
?
As always, we check in right before game time with  our opinionated guru
buddy Bob Harris from the TFL Report.? For more info  on subscribing check
out: http://www.tflreport.com/flashupdate.cfm?? Enjoy!
?
Joe
?
?
BLEDSOE NOW APPEARS  READY TO START VS. CHIEFS...
[IMAGE]
.Written By TFL Report Editor Bob  Harris | Posted Saturday December 2,  2000
@ 18:10 PT
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
According to reports out of Foxboro, New England  Patriots quarterback Drew
Bledsoe took his regular  turn at practice for the second day in a row Friday
and all  indications are the veteran signal caller will start and play as
usual against the Chiefs Monday night.

Of course, that hardly means Bledsoe is  100 percent healthy; he's anything
but. And whether it's jammed,  bruised, sprained, fractured, broken or just
plain old sore, the  real problem is trying to figure out just how badly the
thumb on his  throwing hand is injured and how much it affects his ability
to  throw the ball.

Not surprisingly, head coach Bill  Belichick says Bledsoe is no worse off
than he's been the  previous three weeks.

"This is the 13th week of the season.  There will be a lot of players out
there on both teams who will be  less than 100 percent, and (Chiefs
quarterback  Elvis) Grbac is one of them," said  Belichick. "Same thing with
our quarterback. That's football in the  13th week of the season."

Bledsoe came out of the chute strong in  Detroit on Thanksgiving day, but
regressed as the game progressed,  throwing two crucial fourth-quarter
interceptions that kept the team  from mounting a realistic comeback... And
even though Bledsoe  continues to insist the thumb isn't affecting his
throws, you'd be  hard-pressed to find any evidence backing that contention.

The bottom line here says a lack quality  depth at the key offensive skill
positions around him make it very  difficult to rely on Bledsoe for
consistent production...

Other items of interest...

Michael Felger of  the Boston Herald noted earlier this week that with  the
weather sure to be an issue and Bledsoe at less-than-full speed,  coaches
would love come out and run the ball on the Chiefs. The  question is whether
injury-prone J.R. Redmond will  be up to the task. If not, look for Belichick
to spread the load  between Redmond and fellow rookie Patrick Pass.

Reserve tight end Chris  Eitzmann (ribs) was placed on injured reserve for
the  season, leaving the Pats with one roster spot to fill... Starting  wide
out Troy Brown (leg) was the only player not  to fully participate at
practice and his availability is likely to  be determined by a dreaded game
day decision.

?
//////////////////////////
?
MITCHELL REMAINS ON  TRACK TO RETURN AS BENGALS' STARTER...
[IMAGE]
.Written By TFL Report Editor Bob  Harris | Posted Saturday December 2,  2000
@ 08:15 PT
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
Cincinnati Enquirer reporter  Tom Groeschen wrote this morning that Bengals
head coach  Dick LeBeau characterized Scott Mitchell as  "probable" to start
at quarterback when his team takes on the Cardinals  tomorrow.

Mitchell missed last week's game against Pittsburgh  because of a sprained
left knee. This week, his mobility was better as he took  60 percent of the
practice snaps and Akili Smith took 40  percent.

&I think probable's a good word,8 LeBeau said. &We're  gonna see how Scott's
knee responds, but he looks better every day.8

Mitchell took the majority of snaps at Friday's  practice.

&I don't see any reason why I shouldn't be able to  go,8 he said.

LeBeau said Mitchell probably won't need a Sunday  morning test, as he did
last week before the Pittsburgh game.

&I don't think that will be necessary, unless some  complications develop
between today's workout and Sunday,8 LeBeau said.

According to those who follow the team closely, the  Bengals would like to
use the team's remaining games to evaluate Mitchell before  attempting to
re-sign to the veteran signal caller to compete with third-year  man-to-be
Smith for the starting QB job next season.

Team president Mike Brown made the  statements after watching Mitchell
participate in his first practice in 10 days  Thursday...

Other items of interest...

Brown's continuous and vehement denials haven't  stopped the speculation
regarding his future role with the team...  SportsLine.com jumped on the
bandwagon this week when the  reported that the man I like to call the
"Neanderthal GM" is thinking seriously  about reducing his own role and
bringing in a "football man," along the lines of  former Steeler director of
football operations and current ESPN  NFL maven Tom Donahoe, to handle the
day-to-day front office  duties...

Brown's response to another report stating that a  handful of "close friend"
had advised him to step down and let somebody else  handle the team's
football operations was classic:

"I don't have five friends," he stated flatly...

And finally... Rookie wide out Peter  Warrick said his skipping a
team-mandated eye appointment last Tuesday  was an oversight. But if he skips
another one it will cost him.

Team officials set up the checkup because they  believe Warrick needs contact
lenses. Receivers coach Steve  Mooshagian felt strongly enough about it to
levy a $600 fine if Warrick  goes AWOL again...

/////////////////////////

?

GROH UPBEAT AS MARTIN  CONTINUES TO MAKE PROGRESS...
[IMAGE]
.Written By TFL Report Editor Bob  Harris | Posted Saturday December 2,  2000
@ 05:50 PT
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
ESPN's John Clayton reported last night  that New York Jets halfback Curtis
Martin took all  of his regular snaps Friday and should be fine for Sunday's
game  against the Colts.

Martin still has a bruised gluteus  maximus, but he's in better shape than
last week. The fact that he  opened the week listed a probable rather than
starting out as  questionable like last week has to be a good sign.

And if you asked me, head coach  Al Groh seemed to be quite a bit more upbeat
this  week, at one point responding to a reporters request that he assess
Martin's current condition by saying, "Fine, fine..."

That's about as in-depth, detailed and  upbeat reply I've heard him utter
this season.

But seriously folks... The soreness in  Martin's booty could linger, but it
won't keep the former Patriot  out of the lineup... And with Bernie Parmalee
emerging as a legitimate threat in a relief role, the Jets seem to  be
capable of getting the job done.

Also of interest this morning...

Rookie tight end Anthony  Becht now has a neck injury to go along with the
sore knee  that's bothered him the last two weeks. However, the youngtster
is  expected to start and play as usual at this point... Fellow rookie
Laveranues Coles will miss his second straight game  with a knee sprain and
his absence has clearly left a void in the  team's vertical passing game the
last two weeks... On a more postive  note, Coles was able to get some light
work in during practice late  this week and could return at or near full
speed sometime next  week... In the meantime, Windrell Hayes will  continue
to come off the bench as the number-three man until Coles  return...

Former Steeler wide out Malcolm  Johnson is becoming part of the Jets system
as expected,  Groh said. The newcomer's biggest challenge is simply learning
how  the Jets operate.

"He's getting more comfortable with the  plays and the words," Groh said.
"Every team has a different  language and you have to adjust to that. He
seems to be a quick  student, he just needs to get through all the
lessons..."

And finally... While the Jets obviouly  have some kind of plan in mind for
implementing Leon  Johnson, it's too early to tell when he might be able to
follow through on such a plan.

"We saw some of the skills that made him  a good player in the past," Groh
said of Johnson's first workout  with the team on Wednesday. "But you also
saw that he started  training camp (Wednesday)."

After blowing out his left knee in the  Jets' season opener last year,
Johnson is eager to work his way back  into the mix...

"Some guys take two days to get ready in  training camp," Groh said. "Some
guys take 10 days or two weeks.  That's where we are with Leon."

"I'm feeling good," Johnson said. "It's  just real good to be back out there.
That's really all I'm concerned  with right now."

The Jets would love for him to return to  form quickly so he can resume
kick-return duties soon and relieve  Dedric Ward, who has not been
impressive...

//////////////////////////////

?

BIAKABUTUKA OUT; HOOVER  TO START VS. RAMS...
[IMAGE]
.Written By TFL Report Editor Bob  Harris | Posted Friday December 1, 2000  @
20:15 PT
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
According to reports out of Carolina tonight, the  Panthers will hit the
field this Sunday without Tim  Biakabutuka, who is struggling to overcome a
painful turf  toe injury, for the third week in a row... According to  ESPN
NFL insider John Clayton, the  Panthers deactivated the former first-round
draft pick because they  didn't want to ruin his chances of playing the final
three weeks of  the season.

Brad Hoover, an  undrafted rookie from Western Carolina, will continue to
line up as  the starting halfback.

His 117-yard, one-TD performance in  Monday night's win over the Packers
added exponentially to the  sudden celebrity status Hoover attained after his
first game as the  starter.

"This whole thing has just been crazy,"  he said. "I've never gotten this
much attention before and I'm still  trying to figure out how to handle it."

Count St. Louis signal caller  Kurt Warner among Hoover's fans...

"I always like that stuff, it's always  good to see guys that were never
given much of a chance to come in  and really make a name and do well for
themselves," the former Arena  League star noted...

Heck, Biakabutuka even admitted to mixed  emotions as he stood on the
sidelines watching fans respond to  Hoover in a way they've never responded
to him. However, the former  University of Michigan star also realizes just
how hard Hoover has  worked -- in almost total obscurity -- prior to getting
this break,  all of which made it hard not to be happy for his teammate.

But Biakabutuka also found himself just a  little bit worried after teammate
Michael Bates  told him the story of fella named Wally Pipp, who  played
first base for the New York Yankees. Or at least he did until  the day this
new kid named Lou Gehrig came along  and filled in for him...

"I don't want to be Wally Pipp,"  Biakabutuka said earnestly.

Other items of interest...

Wide receiver Donald  Hayes, who missed Monday night's game with a groin
injury,  is expected to return to the starting lineup this week.

Veteran fullback William  Floyd will also spend another week on the inactive
list;  Chris Hetherington will continue to start in his  place...
[IMAGE]

 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
cheatsheets-unsubscribe@egroups.com

 - 0.gif


pls print.  thanks df
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 07/01/2000
03:58 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Susan Scott                           06/30/2000 04:23 PM

To: Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum@ENRON, Julia
White/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, sstojic@gbmdc.com
cc: John Buchanan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Glen Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: TW Capacity Options meeting

Here is a quick summary of our meeting on capacity options on TW.  Bill
Cordes, Steve Harris, Shelley Corman, John Buchanan, Tony Pryor, and members
of the TW Commercial Group (including Jeff Fawcett) were present.

 1.  The group all agreed that while it is probably a good idea to mention
that the options could be sold in an online format, we do not want to limit
ourselves at this point and should probably just state that a notice will be
posted on the TW website whenever we have options for sale.

 2.  Price:  the filing needs to include a discussion of how price will be
determined, and how capacity will be awarded.  We might also need to include
an estimate of how much revenue options will generate in the first year.

 3.  Need to add a short explanation of where TW will get the capacity if a
shipper exercises its call option.

 4.  Should frame the service as requiring an exception to current Commission
policy on reserving capacity...not asking Commission to abandon its policy
altogether.

 5.  May need to address:  assignability of options; limitation on damages
for nonperformance.

 6.  Timeline:
  - Turn around a new draft and get further comments (July 3 week)
  - Get Market Services started on its analysis of the new service
  - Begin contacting customers to get their buy-in (Lorraine already has a
producer/customer very interested in supporting our filing)
  - Start the process of getting Board approval (sales of options require
Board approval at Enron)
  - Meet informally with FERC to discuss (Shelley is working on)
  - Make the filing at FERC (we did not try to specify a date yet)

If you have any further comments please let me know.  I am going to try to
get a new draft out by next Friday a.m.


FERC MEETINGS FOR FEBRUARY 2002

          Meeting Dates, Times and Agenda are Subject to Change by FERC without Notice.

 If you are interested in FERC Open and Special Meetings throughout the year you may way to consider a Yearly Internet Package which includes: Open and Special Meetings covered by the Capitol Connection and unlimited access to the Archives (available for 3 months) (Click Here for Yearly Contract <http://www.capitolconnection.gmu.edu/YearlyAgreement.htm>).  Please contact us as soon as possible if you are interested in signing up for either of these meetings or want to get an annual subscription to our Internet service.

SPECIAL MEETINGS FOR FEBRUARY 2002

The Capitol Connection is pleased to announce that it will broadcast (via the internet and telephone Only) the following Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Special Meeting:

Tuesday, February 5, 2002 Thru Thursday, February 7, 2002  (Approx. 9:30 am - 5:00 pm ET)
TOPIC:  Electricity Market Design & Structure
*This 3-day meeting is available as a package (15% discount) or on a daily basis
Click Here for:  Agenda <http://www.ferc.gov/Electric/RTO/mrkt-strct-comments/rm01-12-01-25-02.pdf>
Click Here for:
Package Contract (3 day) <http://www.capitolconnection.gmu.edu/FebSpl-Week.htm>Click Here for:
Daily Contract <http://www.capitolconnection.gmu.edu/Febspl-perDay.htm>(If the above links do not work in your e-mail system, go to our website at www.capitolconnection.org and click on the FERC link on the side bar.  Choose the "This Month's FERC Meeting" Option and you will see the contracts listed beside the meeting dates)

                                        OPEN MEETINGS FOR FEBRUARY 2002

The Capitol Connection is pleased to announce that it will broadcast the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Open Meetings on:

Wednesday, February 13, 2002, 10:00 am ET            Click Here for: Contract <http://www.capitolconnection.gmu.edu/OpenMeeting.htm>
Wednesday, February 27, 2002, 10:00 am ET            Click Here for: Contract <http://www.capitolconnection.gmu.edu/OpenMeeting.htm>
(If the above links do not work in your e-mail system, go to our website at www.capitolconnection.org and click on the FERC link on the side bar.  Choose the "This Month's FERC Meeting" Option and you will see the contracts listed beside the meeting dates)

Meeting dates and times are subject to change without notice. For current information, you can go to our website at www.capitolconnection.org <http://www.capitolconnection.org/> for a link to the FERC's page (you may need to Refresh your browser for the most current information to appear) or you can go to the FERC's web page at www.ferc.gov <http://www.ferc.gov/> The FERC Office of the Secretary can be reached at 202.208.0400.

The Capitol Connection offers FERC meetings live via the Internet, as well as via phone bridge, and satellite, please visit our website at www.capitolconnection.org <http://www.capitolconnection.org/> or send e-mail to capcon@gmu.edu for more information. If there is a meeting you are interested in receiving, please call 703-993-3100.

Sincerely,

Capitol Connection


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Ramesh, Ganapathy
Sent:	Monday, January 07, 2002 4:02 PM
To:	Wilson, Shona
Cc:	Brackett, Debbie R.; White, Stacey W.; Gossett, Jeffrey C.
Subject:	RE: NETCO access to RisktRAC

Shona,
Debbie and I have been talking about this situation and she will get with you shortly.

Regards,
Ramesh

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Wilson, Shona
Sent:	Monday, January 07, 2002 3:28 PM
To:	Hall, Bob M; Gossett, Jeffrey C.; White, Stacey W.; Brackett, Debbie R.; Ramesh, Ganapathy; Cheung, Cecilia
Cc:	Beck, Sally; Apollo, Beth; Pearce, Barry
Subject:	NETCO access to RisktRAC

Looks like we have an issue with RisktRAC access.  In order to be able to set up books in RisktRAC, the only role that currently exists is the Risk Controls group, who has access to all books, hierarchies etc (all groups, all commodities).  With NetCo coming on line, the Risk Controls group has been asked to approve RisktRAC access to the new NetCo controls group so they can set up the new gas books that have been requested.  I am uncomfortable granting access to NetCo personnel, as they would be able to see all the estate info, including Europe, EIM, EGM, ENA etc.  Also, it is my understanding that the IT groups are working on splitting out the systems but will not be able to do so until after these books have to be set up (deadline for them is next Monday).  As such, I recommend the following:

In order to ensure there is a segration between NetCo and the estate, until the systems are segregated, the IT groups should be responsible for setting up books, curves etc.

How does that sound?

Thanks

Shona Wilson
Director, Global Risk Operations
X39123


Sally,

As you are probably aware the Continental Power book split project went well
but there were a number of areas which were not completed for one reason or
another but essentially IT did not deliver according to the agreed timetable.
Todd was instrumental in helping me to drive this forward and was responsible
for much of what we achieved.

As you may also be aware we had some personnel issues and there have been
significant changes in the Continental Risk Management team. We have now
recruited a strong manager in Coralie Evans from CSFB and she starts on the
29th of August. We have also added Michelle Waldhauser from the Houston Gas
Risk Management team who arrived on the 7th of August.

There are a number of issues and developments which would greatly benefit
from having Todd here in London for around a month (I say around a month as I
am guessing within this period he would want to spend some time in Oslo
pushing the weather Risk Management area forward). Attached is a page I put
together that cover our immediate needs and why Todd is ideally placed to
potentially add an enormous amount of value to the Continental Power business.

Could we please get together with Brent Price and Mike Jordan and discuss
whether Todd would be available come over.

Thanks and regards James


SVMG Energy Committee Members:
We will be discussing the following at our next committee meeting, this
Wednesday.  The Hewlett Foundation announced today a $10 million energy
initiative designed to add a new dimension to regional and national energy
policy issues. The Foundation?s energy initiative will focus on energy
supply and conservation issues in California and the Intermountain West and
will support the development of comprehensive, balanced and practical
national energy policy options. By sponsoring research and analysis of
contemporary energy issues, the Foundation?s objective is to enable a wide
spectrum of research institutions and organizations to bring new ideas and
analysis into the energy debate.  We are aiming to determine the role of
SVMG in this regard and hope to gain insight from you at our committee
meeting.  Thank you for your thoughtful analysis.
############################################################################
#####

From: Hewlett Foundation
[mailto:R-3-62870-2628886-2-254-US2-A0B8DB44@xmr3.com]
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 6:08 AM
To: cguardino@svmg.org
Subject: Hewlett Foundation Launches New Energy Initiative

For Immediate Release
Contact: Jay Ziegler

Monday, August 6, 2001

Burson-Marsteller
916.341.1000

Hewlett Foundation Launches New Energy Initiative

Project Seeks to Find Solutions and Common Ground in Addressing California,
Rocky Mountain and National Energy Issues

Extends Foundation?s Public Policy Agenda which Includes Recent Sponsorship
of National Commission on Federal Election Reform

The Hewlett Foundation today announced a $10 million energy initiative
designed to add a new dimension to regional and national energy policy
issues. The Foundation?s energy initiative will focus on energy supply and
conservation issues in California and the Intermountain West and support the
development of comprehensive, balanced and practical national energy policy
options. By sponsoring research and analysis of contemporary energy issues,
the Foundation?s objective is to enable a wide spectrum of research
institutions and organizations to bring new ideas and analysis into the
energy debate.

"The Hewlett Foundation Board is very excited to sponsor a comprehensive
look at the energy resource challenges facing the United States," said
Walter B. Hewlett, Chairman of the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation
Board of Directors. "Too often, critical public policy questions such as the
energy debate are polarized before the discussion begins. This project is
designed to fill a number of information gaps in the debate and seek to
establish a ?center ground? of ideas that respond to the need for a sensible
long-term energy policy in the United States."

Over the next two years, the Foundation?s energy initiative will help
develop energy policy options by sponsoring new environmental research,
economic and policy analysis, and experimental conservation projects. The
scope of programs envisioned under this initiative will address both energy
supply and conservation challenges and apply practical cost-benefit analysis
at the intersection of energy economics and environmental science. The
Foundation will include diverse stakeholders such as the energy industry,
environmental groups and other NGOs, academic institutions and "think
tanks," state and federal policymakers, and consumers in this process.

"For too long there has been too much noise and not enough thoughtful
discussion about the difficult choices that policymakers must confront in
solving America?s energy problems," said U.S. Senator Dianne Feinstein
(D-California). "I applaud the Hewlett Foundation for its effort in
sponsoring important research and in providing an important new venue to
address these complicated issues in a non-partisan framework."

 "The Hewlett Foundation has a strong reputation for undertaking important
public policy work," said U.S. Senator Ben Nighthorse Campbell (R-Colorado).
"It is my hope that this project leads to some creative solutions to our
energy supply and conservation challenges. I look forward to watching this
effort evolve into an important source of information in the energy policy
debate in the near future."

Recently, the Hewlett Foundation was a leading sponsor of the bipartisan
National Commission on Federal Election Reform. On Tuesday, July 31, the
Commission published a comprehensive series of policy recommendations to
improve voter registration and election practices across the nation.

"The Hewlett Foundation takes pride in supporting bipartisan or
multi-partisan approaches to controversial public policy issues," said Paul
Brest, President of the Hewlett Foundation. "In the political arena,
controversial issues tend to push interest groups into conventional
alignments. The energy initiative is designed to inform this polarized
debate with reliable data and sound analysis. We hope to generate new ideas
that challenge the conventional dichotomy between energy and conservation.
This project does not end at research. Rather, we intend to provide a forum
for diverse points of view to assemble and address America?s energy policy
challenges."

The Hewlett Foundation has begun selecting academic institutions, other
foundations, think tanks, trade groups, and other participants to define the
specific scope of various project elements. The Foundation will not
entertain unsolicited proposals for this project. As the project advances,
scientific reports, analysis, and other information will be disseminated to
regional and national policymakers and interest groups. Additionally,
project updates and additional energy-related information will be posted on
a website: www.hewlettenergy.org

# # #


Conference call with UBS


Start Date: 12/13/01; HourAhead hour: 23;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001121323.txt


Start Date: 1/17/02; HourAhead hour: 4;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.


Tony's quotes

Hess is +2.5 for baseload and +3 for switchable

engate is +3 for baseload

He showed them your +1.5 and + 2 bids