---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron on 07/10/2001
04:48 PM ---------------------------

Sergio Assad
06/21/2001 11:23 AM
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Regulatory Affairs events

Rick

As per your request, see attached summary regarding our activities in Brasil
from Jan to April.
Unfortunately we couldn't sent to you before due to a lot problems we are
facing here.
Thanks
Sergio Assad

---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron on 07/10/2001
04:48 PM ---------------------------

Guillermo Canovas
07/03/2001 09:02 PM
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Andrea Calo/SA/Enron@Enron, Michael Guerriero/SA/Enron@Enron, Amr
Ibrahim/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Power Decree 804 and Resolution 135

This is to inform you the recent approval of the below commented rules in
Argentina. If the economic and political environment gets calmer, these rules
will be an important step in the power deregulation process an will allow us
to reach some of the goals set for the regulatory group for this year.

Goal 1- Eliminate or Increase fuel declaration caps: there will not be more
fuel declarations but price declarations (Section 1, Resolution 135). The
rules do not mention any cap for price declarations.

Goal 2 - Daily fuel declaration: The 6 month fuel declaration was replaced by
a daily price declaration (Section 1, Resolution 135).

Goal 3 - Reduce or eliminate the obligation to physically back up agreements
with end users or LDCs: According to the interpretation of AGEERA (Gencos
Association) we would have been gotten also this objective and marketers may
already buy or sell spot as long as the contract with the customer does not
have supply guarantee (Section 5, Resolution 135). It is not clear in the
rule wich is the condition for marketers to buy or sell spot.

Now the Secretariat of Energy must issue its own Resolution to amend the
technical Procedures in line with these rules. From the text of Resolution
135 (sections 3 c, 5 and considerations) there would be a good probability to
reach other two goals through the Secretariat of Energy rule:
Reduce minimum term for Output & Demand Marketing Agreements to one month
Eliminate or reduce to 1 MW the threshold for Output Marketing Agreements

Amr and I are asisting Buenos Aires Ofice to analize the new rules to
eventually submit comments to the Secretariat of Energy.
Attached is the document with the regulatory goals.
Regards
Guillermo

---------------------- Forwarded by Guillermo Canovas/SA/Enron on 07/03/2001
08:40 PM ---------------------------

Andrea Calo
06/29/2001 06:49 PM
To: Jose Bestard/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sergio
Assad/SA/Enron@Enron, Michael Guerriero/SA/Enron@Enron, Remi
Collonges/SA/Enron@Enron, Julian Poole/SA/Enron@Enron, Roberto
Volonte/ENRON@enronXgate, Laura Feldman/SA/Enron@Enron, Guillermo
Canovas/SA/Enron@Enron, Maria Pia Beccaccini/SA/Enron@Enron, Rodolfo
Freyre/SA/Enron@Enron, John J Shoobridge/SA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Power Decree 804 and Resolution 135

In an attempt to further reduce State intervention in the power market, on
June 19, the Executive Branch issued Decree 804/01 which completes the
deregulation process of the power industry initiated in 1992, and amends
Electricity Law 24.065.  On June 26 the Minister of Infrastructure issued
Resolution 135/01 setting forth  the guidelines for the future regulation of
the Decree.

The Secretariat of Energy's resolution that will regulate the Decree will be
effective as from September 1, 2001. All agents of the electric sector will
be invited to comment the terms of regulatory decree, although such comments
will be used for informational purposes and will not bind the Secretariat of
Energy to make any changes whatsoever to its original document.

Although Decree No 804/01 is effective as from today, there are doubts in the
industry as to whether it will be abolished in the future by Congress.  The
reason for this uncertainty is that such Decree was issued within the
framework of the Competitivity Law, by which Congress delegated to the
Executive Branch its  powers to legislate  specifically on changes required
to transform the economy.  Although this Decree and the changes it fosters
indirectly affect the economy, since the law it amends is not purely
"economical", it may be questioned.  There is no term within which Congress
may exercise this right.

Please find a summary of the relevant changes below.

Generators Remuneration:
Forward Market: freely negotiated
Spot Market:  only payment of "hourly spot price" at each node.
Hourly Spot Price: determined by price offers based on demand and
transportation constraints

Daily Declarations
The day before the daily dispatch, each Generator shall:
declare its price offers for each  peak, shoulder and valley hour at its
node;
declare its maximum operating limits and minimum available capacity;
offer all of its available capacity.

Calculation of Hourly Spot Price "HSP"
HSP shall be calculated by the OED according to procedure to be determined by
the Secretariat of Energy, not based on marginal costs as it is today.
Prices shall be calculated at each node before the initiation of each day.
At the end of each day prices shall be recalculated based off real operations
on the system.

Spot Market
Generators and Marketers shall be paid on an hourly basis according to the
volume of energy delivered at the node, which shall be valued at the HSP.
If distributors, large users and/or marketers enter into supply contracts
then to clear transactions on the spot market , the OED shall consider that
the sellers (Marketers/Generators) assume their clients payment obligations
before the market.
On spot market transactions, Generators shall not receive payments for any
other concept.

Forward Market
Generators and Marketers may enter into contracts with distributors,
marketers and large users at freely negotiated prices and terms.

Marketers
Are now considered agents of the electric sector.
May enter into forward contracts and/or carry our purchase and sale
transactions on the spot market at the node HSP.
Must declare their offer and demand at each node of the system.
Their obligations shall be similar to those of Generators and Distributors
when they transact at the MEM.

Congestion Rights
Right to receive profits resulting from the difference in energy prices
between two nodes related to the link and the capacity charge of the relevant
transmission system.
In the case of:
Existing transportation lines under concession, these rights belong to the
State, which will sell them under a public offering called by the
Secretariat of Energy.
Existing transportation lines carried out by an independent transporter shall
belong to such transporter.
New transportation lines, shall belong to the owner of the same.

Expansions
Sole Risk Investment Expansions: Open to anyone who is interested; will
require technical and environmental certification of the ENRE and license
from the                 Secretariat of  Energy.

System Reliability Expansions:  Shall be built by awardee of public tender.

Distributors
Have to satisfy all demand of users within their area that have the choice of
independently contracting their supply in the  MEM; Distributors may offer
contracting options with or without supply guaranty; these contracts shall be
considered special contracts
When they contract their demand with Generators and/or Marketers, the general
terms of the contracts as well as the procedure for selecting suppliers will
be subject to guidelines established by the Secretariat of Energy;
In order for the price under these contracts to be passed through to their
end users tariffs, the relation between the term of the contracts and the
volume purchased must comply with a chart that basically states that the
greater the term of the contract, the lesser the percentage of contracted
energy.
In any case, the total amount of energy contracted can not be in excess of
the total demand of users that can't transact on the MEM.

Forced Dispatch
Distributors may request forced dispatch of certain units;
The Distributor that requests forced dispatch is responsible for payment of
the same, Secretariat of Energy to control if forced dispatch costs are
reasonable.
Such price shall not be transferred to end users and shall not be taken into
account to calculate the HSP.

---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron on 07/10/2001
04:48 PM ---------------------------

Jose Bestard@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
07/07/2001 06:57 PM
To: Luiz Maurer/SA/Enron@Enron
cc: Richard Shapiro@Enron

Subject: Cuiaba Issues - July 6 situation-

Luiz. Thank you for your note.  We are still in the boxing ring!. The first
round was won but we still have some more rounds to go. Next week is the
consent, provably in two weeks we will discuss the regulatory obstacles..

Jose
---------------------- Forwarded by Jose Bestard/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
07/07/2001 05:54 PM ---------------------------

Jose Bestard
07/07/2001 03:41 PM
To: Cuiaba LT
cc: Sergio Assad/SA/Enron@Enron, Orlando Gonzalez/SA/Enron@Enron, Joe
Kishkill/SA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Cuiaba Issues - July 6 situation-

Topic I -- Amendment 4

We spent the morning perfecting Aditivo 4 with Furnas, to cover the situation
where the commissioning plan did not go as scheduled. It was signed early
afternoon and sent to Eletrobras.

The Eletrobras Diretoria had not followed this issue closely and need legal
clearance. Furnas and the Ministry (Perazzo) called to give it priority. Late
at night we received word that the "parecer" (opinion) was ready and that it
the Anex would  signed by Eletrobras next Monday and entered into their Board
meeting next Tuesday.

Petrobras sent us the letter we asked but took out of their version a key
word "only". "Only" refers that they will not go after us for non-payment if
Furnas does not pay. In the letter they also stated that they will commence
the loading operation -- at their own risk - Saturday. This was requested by
Perazzo to save logistical time because it takes three days to get to Cuiaba
from the refinery.

[Advised Laine of the situation to check Monday how many trucks were loaded
and  in transit]

We contacted Perazzo through Sergio Assad to get his word that there would
not be a last minute hitch; otherwise, we may have to refuse to take the
diesel and would create a BIG PR problem for all.

Topic III - Consent Package (Opinions, Aditivo, Consent)
Furnas came in with the list of issues they wanted to discuss. I instead
insisted that we treat this meeting as a continuation of the MME meeting and
follow the Agenda  by looking at the Consent document package -- actually go
over the text -  that they find objectionable, and,  if it the text had a
direct link with any of their issues, we would discuss and examine the
relative positions.

What they told me is what they have told me before, that some of the issues
have nothing to do with the Consent but they want it as a condition to agree
to the package. Which is fine to me, because it will make it clear to the
government what we have been saying --- they want to change the deal. In
Furnas' defense, I need to add that they feel they have been handed a bad
contract  and they want regulatory relief, which it has been granted, on a
case-by-case basis, in other deals. So part of their strategy is to force
MME, or Aneel to provide some tariff relief.

I asked them to list out  the key issues with the Consent-  Old-- a) the 90
days additional time (Furnas), b) The guarantee substitution at the time of
privatization, c) the lenders involvement on contract changes "we do not want
to go to Washington to negotiate" - Newer - d) giving up their right to ask
Aneel to "homologar", ratify; rather than "registrar" contract changes [big
risk for us] . I believe the have more direct issues.

We go back to Rio Monday (another holiday down the drain) ..and Tuesday to
complete the list -- Topic II -- Regulatory conflicts

Jose


---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Neal/HOU/ECT on 04/24/2001 03:48 PM
---------------------------
From: Jennifer Burns/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/23/2001 04:45 PM
To: Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT, Airam
Arteaga/ENRON@enronXgate, Tamara Jae Black/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael W
Bradley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly R Brown/HOU/EES@EES, Jennifer
Burns/ENRON@enronXgate, Angie Collins/ENRON@enronXgate, Shirley
Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer Fraser/ENRON@enronXgate, Mike
Grigsby/HOU/ECT@ECT, "Gross, Adam" <Adam.Gross@ENRON.com>@SMTP@enronXgate,
Rogers Herndon/HOU/ECT@ect, Gary Hickerson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly
Hillis/ENRON@enronXgate, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J
Lavorato/ENRON@enronXgate, Kevin McGowan/ENRON@enronXgate, Scott
Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, John L Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ina
Rangel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman/ENRON@enronXgate, Hunter S
Shively/ENRON@enronXgate, Fletcher J Sturm/HOU/ECT@ECT, Helen Marie
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy Weatherly/Corp/Enron@Enron, Bill
White/NA/Enron@Enron, Judy Zoch/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Trader's Roundtable Meeting

There will be a trader's roundtable meeting tomorrow, April 24th at 4:00PM in
EB3321.  Please let me know if you are unable to attend.

Thank you,
Jennifer
3-9440


The Commodity Fundamentals website is back in service.  Please use the link provided below to access the website:

http://fundamentals.netco.enron.com/main.asp

Thank you,

Amanda Rybarski
Gas Fundamentals
Office: (713) 853-4384
Fax: (713) 646-8453
Pager: (877) 482-0772
Cell: (713) 560-0934


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Enron Announcements/Corp/Enron@ENRON <mailto:Announcements/Corp/Enron@ENRON> [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Enron+20Announcements_Corp_Enron+40ENRON@ENRON.com] <mailto:[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Enron+20Announcements_Corp_Enron+40ENRON@ENRON.com]>  On Behalf Of Ken Lay-@ENRON <mailto:Lay-@ENRON>
Sent:	Thursday, September 20, 2001 10:25 PM
To:	All Enron Worldwide@ENRON <mailto:Worldwide@ENRON>
Subject:	Media Reports

As you know, the U.S. government is investigating hundreds, if not thousands, of relatives, acquaintances and associates of the individuals who may have been involved in the terrorist attacks on Sept. 11.  We believe that the media will soon be reporting that one of the many individuals being questioned is an Enron employee in Houston.  It is appropriate for us to withhold judgment and to continue to cooperate fully with federal authorities.  Because this is a matter in the hands of the federal authorities, we cannot provide additional information at this time.   However, we will keep you informed, to the greatest extent possible.

Please keep in mind that thousands of people who may or may not have any information about the terrorist attacks are being questioned as part of this investigation.  We continue to have every reason to believe that our employees and facilities are safe.  If you have concerns, please call Corporate Security at (713) 345-2804.  If you receive any media or external inquiries about this matter, please call Public Relations at (713) 853-5670.

At Enron, diversity is one of our strengths, and we respect and embrace all people of all faiths and beliefs.  Please continue to keep our employees who have been impacted by this tragedy in your thoughts and prayers.


Thanks for the response.  I will look for your list so that I can send out
invitations.  --Sally

	From:  Jody Crook @ ENRON                           06/19/2000 09:22 AM

To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Summer Cookout

The 30th of July works great for me.  The interns should still be around and
it would be a great way to end the summer.  I will put
a list together of recent graduates and send that to you.  I will also
contact Shelly Jones and get a list of those starting in July.  I think
it would be a good idea to include  friends/dates.  There are not that many
of us Sooners here and we have met  most of our friends
at Enron.  Let me know of anything else I can do.

Thanks Again,
Jody


Hi Molly:

Punit Rawal is a Carnegie Mellon student that Kevin Kindall and Bob Lee
interviewed back in December.  We would like to bring him in for an
interview.  He is definately a "Trading support" prospect.

I forwarded his resume to John Lavorato back in December and inquired
as to whether he would be interested in interviewing him or not, but have
had no response, except that he has not had a chance to look at his
resume yet.

Vince originally said that either John or Gary Hickerson might be interested.
I did not send his resume to Gary, maybe you can check with him?

I am attaching the Interview request form and his resume.  Thanks!

Shirley

 - Punit+Rawal+newresume.doc


I have already asked Paul about this, but I wanted to send this as kind of a reminder.
David Porter from Real Time would like the following files restored from Tape Backup:

P:\RealTime\Increment\Windows2000\AugTradingPorter.xls
P:\ReslTime\Increment\Windows2000\AugServicesPorter.xls

Thanks in advance.

Michael Tully
Application Support, Portland
(503)464-7790 Desk
(503)807-7862
michael.tully@enron.com


Bill,

I looked over the attached spreadsheet and have a couple of observations for you.

First, the analysis representing "Existing Contract:  VAMC Cogen Project" looks sound as far as coming up with rough numbers, however if a slightly different analysis would be need to be performed to arrive at the actual numbers.  I am not sure of the power prices that you used but I will assume that the numbers are accurate.

Second, the analysis representing "New Energy and Water Conservation Project:  To be closed December 2001" I know nothing about, therefore can't comment on such.

Richard

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hatch, Bill
Sent:	Wednesday, October 10, 2001 10:33 AM
To:	Ring, Richard
Subject:	Negawatts from Cogen

Richard,

Here is my first take on the analysis you wanted and acc't numbers.

Please do not show this to anyone before we talk.  I need to get to a meeting in Boston now so I don't have time to write something up which I need to do.  So please keep this just between us.  I'll call you this afternoon.

Thanks,

Bill

 << File: EFS Negawatts from cogen & CSC.xls >>


Gas OII Parties:

Attached is the list of actions which were agreed to at the first OFO Forum
held on August 29, 2000, in San Francisco.  Comments or feedback from the
parties attending the Forum is appreciated.  The basic consensus was that
there is no need for changing anything based on the first several months of
experience under the OFO Settlement.  The best course is to obtain more
experience, monitor OFO behavior and then further consider the options.

Please call or e-mail us if you have questions or comments.  Thanks to those
parties who attended the Forum.  We felt it was a very productive day.

Sincerely,

Randy Litteneker   Ben Campbell
415-973-2179   415-973-1800
rjl9@pge.com   bcc3@pge.com

 <<Notes from 8-29-2000 OFO Forum.doc>>

 - Notes from 8-29-2000 OFO Forum.doc


Yes, but the other shoe is that we should shut down the rest of DealBench. If not, we will need to make large costly changes to the infrastructure to keep it going.


Ann, I haven't heard from you with regard to whether you want me to work the
table at this program.  Please let me know...thanks, SRS


The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  ? 2001 Carr Futures

The charts are now available on the web by clicking on the hot link(s)
contained in this email. If for any reason you are unable to receive the
charts via the web, please contact me via email and I will email the charts
to you as attachments.

Crude     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/crude25.pdf
Natural Gas     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/ngas25.pdf
Distillate     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hoil25.pdf
Unleaded     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/unlded25.pdf

Dec WTI/Brent Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/clz-qoz.pdf
Dec Heat Crack     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/heatcrack.pdf
Dec Gas Crack     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/gascrack.pdf
Dec/May Heat Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hoz-hok.pdf
Jan/Feb Heat Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hof-hog.pdf
Nov Gas/Heat Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hux-hox.pdf
Dec Gas/Heat Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/huz-hoz.pdf
Nov/Mar Unlead Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hux-huh.pdf

Nat Gas Strip Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/StripmatrixNG25.pdf
Nat Gas Spread Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SpreadmatrixNG25.pdf

Crude and Products Spread Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SpreadmatrixCL25.pdf

Scott Oblander
312-762-1015
312-762-1014 fax
Carr Futures
150 S. Wacker
Suite 1500
Chicago, IL 60606


What do you think?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tilotta, Robert W
Sent:	Thursday, October 04, 2001 2:51 PM
To:	Kleb, Steve
Cc:	Geaccone, Tracy; Schick, Warren
Subject:	RE: NNG & TW Ad Valorem Tax Accrual - 2002 Plan vs. 2001 Forecast

Property tax liability, in a given tax year i.e. 2002, is directly related to the level of income and asset cost of the prior calendar year i.e. 2001.  As in the case of NNG & TW, income and asset cost are increasing. Therefore, property taxes also will increase.

In order to keep the property tax liability flat, three strategies are available (1) book any gain on the sale of an asset below the line (N.U.O.I.), (2) assets there are no longer in service should be retired from the books of records, and (3) items that can be expensed should be expensed and not capitalized to plant, property, & equipment.

If you have any other questions or comments, please advise.

Robert W. Tilotta
Enron Corp.
1400 Smith Street
Property Tax Department
Suite 3AC-1462
Houston, Texas 77002-7361

Telephone: (713) 853-7995
FAX: (713) 646-3456
e-mail: Robert.Tilotta@enron.com

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kleb, Steve
Sent:	Thursday, October 04, 2001 6:33 AM
To:	Tilotta, Robert W
Cc:	Geaccone, Tracy; Schick, Warren
Subject:	NNG & TW Ad Valorem Tax Accrual - 2002 Plan vs. 2001 Forecast

The 2002 Plan reflects an annual property tax accrual increase for both companies of approximately $1.0 MM (NNG $.3 MM and TW $.7 MM) above what is presently being accrued on each company this year. Would you please respond to Tracy on the reasons for the increase between years and also provide a possible strategy for keeping the accrual flat. She will need your response by Friday to cover any question/concerns Stan may have after his review this weekend. Thanks in advance for your cooperation and support.


Hey,

Tonight will mark the first night of the MHEB / Eservices Off-peak Alliance.  The Eservices group just signed a contract (a copy of which will be provided to you) effectuating an commercial agreement, where Enron will attempt to market a mutually agreed upon quantity of off-peak power outside of MAPP (including KCPL & MPS) above a MHEB determined reference price.  In addition, if you see a bid in MAPP that is greater than the reference price, let MHEB know about it.  MHEB and Eservices will share the profit(50/50) from trades done.  Also, if there is a TLR, LLR curtailment MHEB will share half the cost of the transmission loss.

Nature of deal:
This is to be a friendly lead-in deal hopefully to be cultivated into longer term deal that will allow us access to some more lucrative products.

Transacting:
Call MHEB during the night shift and their real-time desk will tell you how many MW are available, and what the reference price will be.  If you can sell the power for more that the reference price + transmission, inform the MHEB desk and get it done.  Be careful of TLRs and ATC restrictions.

MAPPF ATC Flowgate website on MAPP Oasis:
Under the heading "Flowgate ATC", select "Non-Firm ATC" to check the atc for flowgates "COOPER_S", "FTCAL_S", and "PRI-BYN".  These are the flowgates that usually cause our MAPP-F requests to be declined.

You can also check the specific path (POR to POD) under the heading "Contract Path ATC".

http://toinfo.oasis.mapp.org/oac/oac2/script/atcs.html

Booking:
Deal should be entered in the Eservices P&L (just like the MDEA deal) and in enpower. Do not Enpower any deals until the Book is created.

Pricing Formula.
Energy Price (paid to MHEB) = .50 (SP - Cost - RP) + RP
SP= Sales Price
RP= Reference Price (MAPP Price to beat)
Cost= All cost incurred Buy/Resale, transmission, etc.

Eservices Staff:
Kayne Coulter and JD Kinser will be the lead contacts for questions regarding this deal.  JD will be the lead in charge of MHEB during the day and will work with MHEB.  You can call either of these guys with questions as well me at any time with questions.

Kayne & I spoke with Glen Matthews today and he said that he thought that they would have some power available beginning HE 1.  Keep in contact with them through the early evening and durin the night.

We believe that this deal, in the future, will be very lucrative for Enron and MHEB.  Therefore, please use all diligence to make sure the deals are done correctly and maximize value for us both.

If there are any questions tonight, please, call/page Kayne Coulter or me.

Thanks,

Don


---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 05/24/2001
02:39 PM ---------------------------

eserver@enron.com on 05/24/2001 03:37:44 PM
To: "Steven.J.Kean@enron.com" <Steven.J.Kean@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: <<Concur Expense Document>> - JB 004

The following expense report is ready for approval:

Employee Name: John Brindle
Status last changed by:  Automated Administrator
Expense Report Name: JB 004
Report Total: $2,566.85
Amount Due Employee: $2,566.85

To approve this expense report, click on the following link for Concur
Expense.
http://xms.enron.com


This deal is with Mieco. It's been changed.

Thanks,
Kate

Kerri Thompson@ENRON
12/05/2000 07:07 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: 473241

apb shows this deal should be with mieco.

thanks


Enron and Dynegy each announced today that they are holding discussions about a possible merger of the two companies.  As you know, Dynegy is a major player in the energy marketplace, and is not only a competitor, but also a counterparty of Enron.  This is just one of several options that we are considering.

Upon receipt of this announcement, the NYSE briefly suspended trading of both Enron and Dynegy.  We have no additional information we can share at this time.  We'll keep you updated as developments occur.


Attached are my notes from the session with the Alliance for Energy suppliers
held today at Reliant's offices.  You'll see from the notes that this effort
isn't going anywhere fast.  Nonetheless, I thought you would be interested in
the market intelligence of how other pipelines, particularly Tennessee, are
dealing with the generators.


The following items were presented in this week's corporate change control....

Feb. 13
From 5:00 p.m.  through 2/14 at 6:00 a.m., the Envision team will perform hardware maintenance on the Envision system.  This outage will affect corporate-wide applications accessing the Envision web query, FileNet Panagon IDM Desktop, FileNet IDM for R3, Panagon Capture professional. Users will be able to access IBuyit and IPayit from SAP but will not be able to view invoices.
Feb. 14
At 12:00 noon, Enron Network Services will disable advertisement of the 172.29.0.0 networks on the OmahaCisco router.  This is to prevent unwanted traffic from routing through Northern Border.  No impact is expected.
Feb. 15
Beginning today, the Application Scripting team will modify the script for Instant messanger to allow parameters.  No impact is expected.

Feb. 15
From 10:30 - 11:00 p.m., Enron Network Services will fail over Internet traffic to the primary firewall.  This change will result in a 10-15 second outage for Internet traffic and access to servers on the 192.189.171.0 and 65.201.84.0 DMZ segments.  This change will be coordinated with HotTap and will not take place until processing is completed.  Support staff with application servers on the DMZ should plan on testing their applications after this change.

Feb. 16
From 10:30 - 11:30 p.m., the Omaha Infrastructure team will reconfigure the power connections for the Omaha Inverse MUX.  This change will result in a total disruption of IP communication between Omaha and Houston.  The outage should only last for a few minutes.  The maintenance time will be coordinated with the HotTap helpdesk to ensure processing has been completed.  All support staff whose applications are affected by this outage should communicate this change to their customers.  Please ensure they are aware of the possibility of an extended outage in the event the Inverse MUX does not properly re-establish communications.  LAT and DecNet communications for gas control will not be affected by this maintenance.

ETS Solution Center - Houston, at 713-345-4745
ETS Solution Center - Omaha, at 402-398-7454


I can make time.  Let's try to let Leslie vacation.  Also, I'm having a memo
prepared that should be ready first thing Monday AM on the CA Commission's
policies regarding utility use of hedging instruments.  Just let me know when
you'd like to talk.

Best,
Jeff


Vance,

Deals have been created and entered in Sitara as noted below:

Bob

From:	Vance L Taylor/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/18/2001 11:35 AM
To:	Robert Cotten/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:	Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Hesse/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cynthia Hakemack/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Smith/ENRON@enronXgate, Donald P Reinhardt/ENRON@enronXgate, Melissa Graves/ENRON@enronXgate, George Weissman/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject:	FW: FIRST DELIVERIES - PURE RESOURCES AND LOUIS DREYFUS NATURAL GAS

Bob,

The following production is now on-line and a ticket should be created and entered into sitara based on the following:

Counterparty			Meter			Volumes	Deal #	Price				Period		Global No.
Louis Dreyfus Nat Gas Corp		9874			750mmbtu/d	740193	If del vols <300/d, 88% GD
											>300/d, 100% GD less $0.29	4/12-4/30	96058618

Pure Resources, L.P.		9882			425mmbtu/d	740198	100% GD less $0.14		4/17-4/30	96058384

FYI, we will create and submit committed reserves firm tickets for the remaining term of the deals beginning with the appropiate month.  Additionally, these are Producer Svcs. deals and should be tracked in the IM Wellhead portfolio... attached to the gathering contract.

Thanks,

vlt
x3-6353

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Buckley, Esther
Sent:	Wednesday, April 18, 2001 10:53 AM
To:	Carriere, Molly; Cernosek, Clem; Consemiu, Donna; Cook, Robert; Camp, Howard; Hesse, Lisa; Hlavaty, Nathan; Wayne E Lightfoot/HOU/ECT@ENRON; McKay, James; Smith, Mary; Schneider, Steve HPL; Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT@ENRON; Walters, Michael; Zivley, Jill; Johnson, Mary Jo; Wynne, Rita; Allen, Lauri; Jones, Cheryl; Hansen, Reid; Giron, Darron; Winfree, O'Neal; Susan Smith/HOU/ECT@ENRON; Bryan, Gary; Hanks, Gary; Donald P Reinhardt/HOU/ECT@ENRON; Vance L Taylor/HOU/ECT@ENRON; Baumbach, David; Cotten, Robert; Riley, Brian; Austin, Jeff; Hakemack, Cynthia; Kenne, Dawn; Lisa Csikos/HOU/ECT@ENRON; Fosdick, J R; Rodriguez, Carlos; Gomes, Stephanie; Clynes, Pat; Acton, Tom; Walker, Robert; Weissman, George; Harris, JoAnne; Sweeney, Christy; Tisdale, Earl; Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ENRON
Subject:	FIRST DELIVERIES - PURE RESOURCES AND LOUIS DREYFUS NATURAL GAS

See attached files


Kate,
Thanks for the update.  The changes you have made to deals 566424.1 and
566426.1 are not reflected on the carp report - maybe these need to be
auto-scheduled??  As for 576512.1 I've added the hours in question to the
spreadsheet.  If you need more clarification, please give me a call.

Thanks
Brooklyn
713.853.1909