Just in case the first number I sent out doesn't work....

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rosado, Jennifer
Sent:	Friday, February 01, 2002 3:56 PM
To:	Mcquade, Jennifer
Subject:	RE: Conf Room

It looks like 713-584 are the new prefix's, but they are as follows:

713-584-1091
713-584-1093
713-584-1050
713-584-1092

I've not been in that room, so I would guess that the first number would be sufficient.


Note:If you do not want to receive notice of any upcoming programs, please
reply to this email with "remove" in the subject line. You also can limit
notices to specific topics by replying and specifying the topics. Thank
you.

Dear Mr. Dasovich,

Power & Water conference: Water is a critical path for every energy project
and this year it has become more important than ever. A new administration
adds yet another complicating factor to the Pacific Northwest's water and
energy uncertainties. This program's distinguished faculty, including
Judity Johansen (now CEO of PacifiCorp) and former Senator Slade Gordon,
will provide insights that will help anyone dealing with water and energy
supply issues to move more surely through these troubled times.

When/Where: August 16 & 17 at the Renaissance Madison Hotel in Seattle.

Program Co-chairs: Randall J. Hardy of Hardy Energy Consulting and
Elizabeth Thomas of Preston Gates & Ellis LLP.

Information or registration: reply to this announcement; call us at (800)
854-8009; or visit our web site:
http://www.lawseminars.com/htmls/seminars/01powa.

--------------------------------------------
Copyright 2001 by Law Seminars International
All Rights Reserved
--------------------------------------------


Per Scott, the Crescendo meetings scheduled for tomorrow, 3/6/01,  and the
one scheduled for next week, 3/13/01, are both cancelled.

The next scheduled meeting will take place on Tuesday, March 20th.

Thanks!


Hello Everyone,

There is a new version of the database.  Please install by Hitting your Start
Button, Run, Type O:\EOL\EOL REPORTING DATABASE\VIEW DATA\EOL VIEW DATABASE
INSTALLER.BAT.  The new version of the database will automatically shut you
out for 15 minutes everyday when it is necessary to update with the current
trading data.  We apologize for the inconvenience.

The old version of the database no longer contains any data.   Please be sure
to update.

Thanks,

Carrie and Eugenio


John Florence


Did I make you laugh?

"Sue V. Herbich" <sherbich@paclawteam.com> on 12/19/2000 07:14:06 PM
To: <Rob.G.Gay@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: RE: Thinking of you

only you can give new meaning to a rear-ender :-)

-----Original Message-----
From: Rob.G.Gay@enron.com [mailto:Rob.G.Gay@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2000 1:12 PM
To: Sue V. Herbich
Subject: RE: Thinking of you

P.S.

I'd like to rear end you too.


Jane,

The difference between your price indications and EOL are twofold.  One, we are showing you physical markets on the price indications and EOL is strickly financial and for a specific product.  There are many differences in these two products, depending on term, physical premiums, the trader's position, etc.  Two, the price indications that you receive are based on yesterday's markets.  EOL is a real time current market price for the specific product listed.  Give me a call if you have any more questions and we can discuss further.

thanks,

Kim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Ratchye, Jane" <jane_ratchye@city.palo-alto.ca.us>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Ratchye+2C+20Jane+22+20+3Cjane+5Fratchye+40city+2Epalo-alto+2Eca+2Eus+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Tuesday, July 31, 2001 11:01 AM
To:	Bronstein, Mara; Padilla, Monica; Ward, Kim S (Houston); Dailey, Karla; Ratchye, Jane
Cc:	Smith, Raiford
Subject:	RE:

Mara;

I am wondering why the basis shown on the indicatives is much higher than
basis shown on Enron Online?  For example, basis to PG&E citygate on
EnronOnline is about $0.88 for Nov01-Mar02 and $0.78 for Nov02-Mar03, but
the indicative shows about $1.18 and $0.92 respectively.  Are these
different products?  Is the difference attributable to the indicatives being
for physical products?  Just trying to learn something.

Jane.

-----Original Message-----
From: Bronstein, Mara [mailto:Mara.Bronstein@ENRON.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 6:47 AM
To: Padilla, Monica; Ward, Kim S (Houston); Dailey, Karla; Ratchye, Jane
Cc: Smith, Raiford
Subject:

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Allen, Diana
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 8:05 AM
To:	Black, Tamara Jae
Subject:	FW: NetCo Production Databases Reorg.

TJ.

Can you please let everyone know that our Power Decision Support database will be down today, and could possible stay down until tomorrow morning.

I will notify you as soon as the database comes on line again.

Thanks,

Diana Allen
X35356

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tang, Mable
Sent:	Wednesday, January 30, 2002 1:28 PM
To:	Allen, Diana; Poston, David; Luu, Duong; Lim, Francis S.; Krishnaswamy, Jayant; Chitradurga, Sundar; Powell, John D.; Ramesh, Ganapathy; Schomer, Chris; McKinney, Hal
Cc:	Wei, Zhiyong; Nat, Steve; Johnson, Jeff; Stock, Steve; Hillier, Bob; Berger, Michael; Charbonnet, Clement; Invedy, Tantra; Johnston, Jamey; Ritacco, Michael
Subject:	NetCo Production Databases Reorg.

Hello Everyone,

The Oracle DBA team would like request NetCo production database downtime starting tomorrow Thursday 01/31/2002 at
10am to perform database reorg.  This reorg is important to ensure efficient data access after the data cleansing effort.

Attached is the summary of the reorg work and the estimated downtime.  All NetCo production databases will be ready
no later than Friday 02/01/2002 at 7am if not earlier.

Please response with your approval by COB today.  If you have any further questions, please feel free to contact me or your dbas.

Thanks,
Mable

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Charbonnet, Clement
Sent:	Wednesday, January 30, 2002 12:03 PM
To:	DL-Oracle DBA
Subject:	Database Reorg.

Attached is the spreadsheet of the database reorg sizes.

Clement


Want a NEW high speed computer?

866 MHz Pentium III Processor FAST enough?

Want High Speed internet?
Broadband,
Cable Modem,
DSL,
Satellite.

Then Get READY...
All Eligible U.S. Employees get innovative at HOME beginning March, 2001.

Go to http://clickathome.enron.com to LEARN more about the offerings.

Non-U.S. Eligible Employees get innovative at home beginning late 2001 and
2002.


Peter,

Enron South America has nothing to do with COA.  Enron North America is the
assignee.

As for payments, we can state that as of the signing of the agreements, all
payments have been made.  Sounds ok to me.

Kay

"Thompson, Peter J." <peterthompson@akllp.com> on 11/20/2000 11:09:56 AM
To: <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc: <eric.boyt@enron.com>

Subject: RE: Information Needed for City of Austin

Is Enron South America the assignee for the City of Austin deal?  If so,
I need its place of incorporation and location of its ofices.  As to the
exhibits, I believe most can be copied.  However, at least Exhibit N-3
is deal specific and will list the purchase amount for aech unit for the
calculation of the unit liability amount.  If the November payment has
been made, then the turbines for the City of Austin have been completely
paid for. Should I just put Not Used for Section 6.1.2?

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, November 20, 2000 11:53 AM
To: Thompson, Peter J.
Cc: Kay Mann (E-mail); Pipitone, Paul; Cobb, Chris
Subject: Re: Information Needed for City of Austin

Hi Peter,

1. I don't think you need to do anything re Enron South America, as Rob
Taylor is working on that.  Were you asking about ENA? Delaware, 1400
Smith, Houston, 77002.
 2.  I don't know who is preparing all the exhibits, as I'm waiting to
hear
from GE.  Don't most of the exhibits just need to be copied?  Is the
list
you gave me of the exhibits which need to be adapted the right place to
look?
3. No.  The November payment has been made.

You should get the other info by email from Eric Boyt.

Thanks,

Kay

"Thompson, Peter J." <peterthompson@akllp.com> on 11/20/2000 10:33:27 AM

To:   "Kay Mann (E-mail)" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc:   "Pipitone, Paul" <paulpipitone@akllp.com>, "Cobb, Chris"
      <chriscobb@akllp.com>

Subject:  Information Needed for City of Austin

I need the following information to complete the City of Austin Facility
Agreement:

1.         Where is Enron South America incorporated and where are its
offices located?

2.         For the recitals, what is the kW capacity of its plant and
where
is the plant located?

3.         Please confirm that ENA is preparing all exhibits, including
Exhibit N-3 (which is the original price for each unit).

4.         According to the spreadsheet, the City of Austin doesn't make
any payments after November.  I put the amount due in November under the
January 15, 2001 payment date.   Is that correct?

5.         According to the spreadsheet, the Guaranteed Delivery Dates
for
Units 9-11 was 10/30/00.  The Guaranteed Delivery Date for Unit 12 is
11/30/00.  Are these still the dates we are using?

6.         Please provide the serial numbers for Units 9-12 for Section
10.2.1.

7.         Please provide the names, addresses, etc. for Sections 25.1
and
25.3


---------------------- Forwarded by Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT on 11/03/2000
11:33 AM ---------------------------

Shauncy Mathews
11/03/2000 09:18 AM
To: Janet Warri/NA/Enron@Enron, Lisa Shoemake/HOU/ECT@ECT, Judy
Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Angela Collins/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject:

---------------------- Forwarded by Shauncy Mathews/HOU/ECT on 11/03/2000
09:18 AM ---------------------------

	Elida Aguilar @ ENRON

	11/03/2000 09:15:19 AM

To: bheiman@worldnet.att.net, Denissa Arredondo/Corp/Enron@Enron,
julia.guzman@photomask.com, esther.hernandez@photomask.com,
rose.rivera@enron.com, Donna Ruff/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Shauncy
Mathews/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lori Boutte/Corp/Enron@Enron, Albernita
Travis/Corp/Enron@Enron, Valerie Villareal/HOU/EES@EES, Chris
Littlejohn/Enron@EnronXGate
cc:
Subject:

----- Forwarded by Elida Aguilar/Corp/Enron on 11/03/2000 09:12 AM -----

	Patricia Flores <PFlores@corestaff.com>
	11/02/2000 08:50 AM

		 To: Kirsten Bernard <KBernard@corestaff.com>, "'Alicia Contreras'"
<acontreras@appleorthodontix.com>, "'Alton Jr.'" <ajn114@hotmail.com>,
"'Arthur Requena'" <artrequena@yahoo.com>, "'Brittney Gonzales'"
<critter315@aol.com>, "'Carli'" <carli.smallwood@broadwing.com>, "'Diane
Casares'" <cas3355@aol.com>, "'Ehren Moreno'" <emallstar@aol.com>, "'Elda'"
<eldaniecie99@cs.com>, "'Elmontre Williams'" <elmontre.williams@chron.com>,
"'Eric Moreno'" <moreno555@aol.com>, "'Felecia Victor'"
<felecianash@hotmail.com>, "'Larry Flores'" <hckd6190@aol.com>, "'Lila
Aguilar'" <elida.aguilar@enron.com>, "'Rosa Flores'" <r33petal@aol.com>,
"'Roxanne'" <roxanne.leonard@broadwing.com>, "'Ruben'"
<rloredo_iii@hotmail.com>, "'Sooky'" <sookym@aol.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject:

      >
      >      Watch and listen carefully
      >
      >      The man whispered, "God, speak to me" and a
meadowlark
      >      sang.  But, the man did not hear.
      >
      >      So the man yelled "God, speak to me!"  And, the
thunder
      >      rolled across the sky.  But, the man did not listen.
      >
      >      The man looked around and said, "God let me see you."
      >      And a star shined brightly.  But the man did not
notice.
      >
      >      And, the man shouted, "God show me a miracle!"  And,
a
      >      life was born.  But, the man did not know.
      >
      >      So, the man cried out in despair,  "Touch me God, and
      >      Let me know you are here!"
      >
      >      Whereupon, God reached down and touched the man.
But,
      >      the man brushed the butterfly away and walked on.
      >
      >      Don't miss out on a blessing because it isn't
packaged
      >      the way that you expect.
      >
      >      My instructions were to send this to four people that
I
      >      wanted God to bless and I picked you. Please pass
this to
four
      >      people you want  to be blessed.
      >      This prayer is powerful and there is nothing
attached.
      >      Prayer is one of the best gifts we receive. There is
no
      >      cost but a lot of rewards.  Let's continue to pray
for
      >      one another. God bless and have a nice day!
      >
      >      "Father, I ask you to bless my friends, relatives and
      >      email buddies reading this right now. Show them a new
revelation of
      >      your love and power.
      >      Holy spirit, I ask you to minister to their spirit at
      >      this very moment. Where there is pain, give them your
peace
and
      >      mercy. Where there is self-doubt, release a renewed
confidence
      > through your
      >      grace, In Jesus precious Name."
      >      Amen
      >
      >      If you are so inclined, please send this to four
people
      >      who could use an extra dose of God's blessings today
(isn't that
      >      everyone we know)!
      >
      >
      >


This message is only relevant for those going to UBS.

When exporting your EMAIL messages listed in the instructions or via the Outlook Export utility, attachments WILL NOT BE SAVED!
There will be a better solution to exporting your Email messages and all your attachments emailed later today.

Thank you,
John Oh


John and Krishna,

I am sending you an outline of a conference at Stanford on topics related to
demand-side pricing and management in the power markets.

Please, let me know if you are personally interested and who else
in your respective  organizations would like to attend.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/19/2001
08:10 AM ---------------------------

Hill Huntington <hillh@stanford.edu> on 03/15/2001 05:26:55 PM
To: vkamins@enron.com
cc:
Subject: RTP project

Vince,

Targetted conference date is Th-F June 21-22 at Stanford.  Enclosed in the
recent revision to what I sent before.

Great to meet you,
Hill

 - retail notes.rtf
*******************************************************************
Hillard G. Huntington
EMF - an international forum on
energy and environmental markets Voice:  (650) 723-1050
408 Terman Center    Fax:    (650) 725-5362
Stanford University   Email:  hillh@stanford.edu
Stanford, CA  94305-4026

EMF Website: http://www.stanford.edu/group/EMF/


Yes,

The first three legs are the purchase for 80,000/d.  Leg 4 is the annuity, and leg 5 is the put.

I don't think I know what you are asking.

KK

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Diamond, Russell
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 10:03 AM
To:	Keiser, Kam
Subject:	PanNat

See attached Summary Sheet, they all seem to be the same Tagg #'s with different legs.

It looks like legs 1,2,3 are part of the Purchase, while the other legs are part of the Resid Swap.

Thanks Russell

 << File: PanNat Update (12.11.01 )- Summary Sheet.xls >>


ST-CALI is short 50 mws in NP-15 on Monday on peak.  Please buy for ST-CALI (under their book) and sell to the California Imbalance for them.  They are short at $340.
Thanks,
Bill


I believe it is the E-Next Generation LV Co Gen contract.  I believe the last
draft was around the beginning of April.  I can check for more specifics.

Kay

"Cobb, Chris" <chriscobb@akllp.com> on 04/19/2001 10:53:37 AM
To: <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc: "Thompson, Peter J." <pthompson@akllp.com>, <dale.ramussen@enron.com>

Subject: FW: GE and ABB comments

Dear Kay and Dale,
 Peter Thompson is on vacation and has asked me to make the
attached changes (sent to Peter by Dale).  They are very
straight-forward and will only take a minute.  However, there are a
couple of contracts to which the changes could potentially apply, and
I'd like to make sure I've got the right one before I start making
changes.  Please let me know which contract needs to be changed, and
I'll take care of the rest.  Thank you, Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: Lindo, Jacqueline E.
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 1:27 PM
To: Cobb, Chris
Subject: FW: GE and ABB comments

-----Original Message-----
From: Dale.Rasmussen@enron.com [mailto:Dale.Rasmussen@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 9:23 PM
To: Thompson, Peter J.; Kay.Mann@enron.com
Subject: FW: GE and ABB comments

Here's what we're hearing from our contractor.  Can you work them in,
Peter?
---------------------- Forwarded by Dale Rasmussen/HOU/ECT on 04/17/2001
06:30 PM ---------------------------

 (Embedded     Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.
 image moved
 to file:      From:  Don Hammond
 pic10004.pcx) 04/12/2001 10:32 AM

To:   Bill Williams/PDX/ECT@ECT, Dale Rasmussen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:  FW: GE and ABB comments

I'm not sure the status of these agreements and the ability or
appropriateness to incorporate changes. But, here's he input for
consideration.
---------------------- Forwarded by Don Hammond/PDX/ECT on 04/12/2001
10:37
AM ---------------------------

  (Embedded        Enron Capital & Trade Resources
  image moved      Corp.
  to file:
  pic16337.pcx     From:  "Phillips, Bill"
  )                <BPhillips@moderncontinental.com>
                   04/11/2001 04:50 PM

To:   "'don.hammond@enron.com'" <don.hammond@enron.com>
cc:   "Sisson, Bob" <BSisson@moderncontinental.com>
Subject:  FW: GE and ABB comments

Please consider the attached comments in your final
negotiations with GE and ABB. Hopefully this format
is more user friendly than the whole pile. These are
Lauren/DHEC understanding of requirements to conform
with EPC contract.  Bill Phillips

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Garner [mailto:pgarner@laurenec.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 7:41 PM
To: Phillips, Bill
Cc: "Jack Cress"; "Kevin Hargis"; "Mike Shelton"; "Roy Milne"
Subject: GE and ABB comments

Bill,

In reviewing these documents we find that these changes were not
incorporated.  Could you please make certain they are included.

Thanks

Paul

(See attached file: ABB B-1Comments.doc)
(See attached file: GE contract comments.doc)

 - pic10004.pcx
 - pic16337.pcx
 - ABB B-1Comments.doc
 - GE contract comments.doc


those brides maids are ready to party.  this hotel is right on south beach.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Peder Kjeseth" <pederleifkjeseth@hotmail.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 11:55 AM
To:	Lenhart, Matthew
Subject:	RE: Nuptials

That sounds good to me cause then we won't have to go far for that three or
four way with all the bride's maids.

>From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com
>To: pederleifkjeseth@hotmail.com
>Subject: RE: Nuptials
>Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 11:47:18 -0500
>
>i have a room reserved.  it is $160/night.  we can split it up and pay $40
>each which is cheap.  i think it is around jan 12th.  i have the room from
>that thurs-sat.
>
>     -----Original Message-----
>    From:   "Peder Kjeseth" <pederleifkjeseth@hotmail.com>@ENRON
>    Sent:   Wednesday, October 24, 2001 11:35 AM
>    To:     Lenhart, Matthew
>    Subject:  Nuptials
>
>
>
>    Dude,
>
>    What are the exact dates of the wedding?  I still haven't heard shit
>    from
>    Max or Jen and I need to plan this shit.  Where are we suppose to stay?
>    How
>    much $ are you bringing with you?  Man, I feel like I'm getting married
>    this
>    thing is costing me so much.
>
>    -PLK
>
>    _________________________________________________________________
>    Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
>    http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
>
>
>
>
>**********************************************************************
>This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
>and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
>the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
>others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
>authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
>reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
>all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
>intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
>binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
>affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
>relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
>Thank you.
>**********************************************************************

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp


Jen,

I guess my only question is "how many beers do you think you can smuggle
under your shirt?"

-Ryan

Ryan F. Ruppert
Geologist
Core Venture 2 (Red Sea)
Saudi Arabia Gas Resources
ExxonMobil Development Co.
GPP3-220
P.O. Box 4778
Houston, Texas 77210
281.654.5360 Telephone
281.654.1584 Facsimile
ryan.ruppert@exxonmobil.com

                    jennifer-gillaspie@reliant
                    energy.com                      To:     "Gillaspie, Eric" <EGillaspie@coral-energy.com>
                                                    cc:     "Gerald Nemec (E-mail)" <gerald.nemec@enron.com>, "Jeff Gillaspie
                                                      (E-mail)" <Jgillaspieci3@netzero.net>, "Ryan Ruppert (E-mail)"
                    10/18/01 03:41 PM                 <ryan.ruppert@exxonmobil.com>, djunk_epc@yahoo.com
                                                    Subject:     Re: Air Show

Eric seems to think he is in charge of this little outing. But, he is
mistaken because I am the gatekeeper of the tickets. If you have any
questions regarding the Wings Over Houston Airshow this Sunday, please
direct them to me. Thanks for your cooperation.

   This just in from Ellington Field to me.

                                    Please Note!

          Due to heightened security at all airports across the United

          States, the following rules have been issued by the FAA and

          local officials concerning attendance at our airshow:

               Because of heightened security all backpacks, coolers and

               tote bags must be left in the car and will not be allowed

               on the field.

          These rules will be enforced by officials at the gates and on

          the grounds. Your cooperation and understanding is appreciated.

                    "Gillaspie, Eric"

                    <EGillaspie@coral-e        To:     "Gerald Nemec
(E-mail)"
                    nergy.com>                 <gerald.nemec@enron.com>,
"Jeff Gillaspie
                                               (E-mail)"
<Jgillaspieci3@netzero.net>,
                    10/18/01 03:35 PM          "Jennifer Gillaspie
(E-mail)"

<jennifer-gillaspie@reliantenergy.com>, "Ryan
                                               Ruppert (E-mail)"
<ryan.ruppert@exxonmobil.com>
                                               cc:     "Rodger Gilllaspie
(E-mail)"

<Rodger.Gillaspie@ia.ngb.army.mil>
                                               Subject:     Air Show

Performance Schedule

Gates Open
Saturday        8:00 a.m.-6:00 p.m.
Sunday          8:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m.
Warbird Static Display Viewing Times

Saturday        8:00 a.m.-1:30 p.m. 4:15 p.m.-6:00 p.m.
Sunday          8:00 a.m.-1:30 p.m. 4:15 p.m.-5:00 p.m.

No admittance to airshow after 3:00 p.m.

Participating aircraft and flying schedules are subject to change without
notice.

Flying starts at approximately 10:00a.m. each day.

Approximate Order of Performance - Subject to Change!  Radio-controlled
Model Aircraft  147th Fighter Sqdn, Tx ANG F-16 formation flying  OK ANG
F-16 formation flying  Red Baron Pizza Stearman bi-plane solo  AH-64 Apache
helicopter demo  King Krunch monster truck teaser  Paul Fiala 1930's
Barnstormer  F-18F Super Hornet demo  Mary Dilda T-6 "Ballet in the Sky"
Cattin' Around, F-14 Tomcat demo  C-17 Globemaster demo  RE/MAX Skydivers
Flag Jump & National Anthem  F-117 Stealth demo  AeroShell Demo Team  F-16
Viper demo  Heritage Flight with P-47, F-86 and F-16  "Snort" Snodgrass
F-86
Sabre Jet demo  Krunch Time with King Krunch monster truck  Tucker's Turn,
Sean D. Tucker Aerobatics  American Airpower Heritage demo - WWII flight
Airpower Armada - 100 WWII aircraft  F-16 / B-52 Tactical Assault demo
Missing Man formation

Kick the tires and light the fires......

Eric Gillaspie
Counsel
Shell Trading Gas and Power Company
909 Fannin, Suite 700
Houston, Texas 77010
Tel. 713-230-3576
Fax 713-265-3576
2HC 1036


When you have a few minutes, please take a look at the request below.  My
thoughts are this product is not hedgable.  I'm looking for another opinion
and I figure you've probably seen everything under the sun.

I don't need a response today but this week would be great.  Thanks

---------------------- Forwarded by Louis Dicarlo/NA/Enron on 03/01/2001
06:52 AM ---------------------------

Nelson Ferries
02/27/2001 01:19 PM
To: Louis Dicarlo/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Phillips Production Company - Hedge

Louis:

Can you take a look at this and respond to John Singer.
---------------------- Forwarded by Nelson Ferries/Corp/Enron on 02/27/2001
01:18 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  John M Singer                           02/27/2001 10:26 AM

To: Nelson Ferries/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Phillips Production Company - Hedge

Phillips Production would like to know if it is possible to do a Financial
Hedge for both the NYMEX Settle and Basis.  The attached scheudle calculates
the Basis as a percentage of the NYMEX Settle instead of a traditional
location basis.   Please review.

Can the Basis be hedged since it is based on the NYMEX Settle instead of a
traditional location basis?

Volume:  5,000 - 7,000 per day.
Period is :  Apr01 - Oct01


USA: Nevada to examine electric deregulation timetable.

?
09/06/2000
Reuters English News Service

(C) Reuters Limited 2000.
?

?
SAN FRANCISCO, Sept 6 (Reuters) - The timetable for deregulation of Nevada's
electricity market will be examined at a special meeting Sept. 13, called by
Gov. Kenny Guinn (R) with state Public Utilities Commission (PUC) Chairman
Don Soderberg, a spokesman for Guinn said Wednesday.
Nevada's electricity market was to open to competition last March but Guinn
delayed the timing because final rules weren't in place.
?

The state's new timetable now calls for deregulation to be phased in for
various classes of utility customers from Nov. 1, 2000, for big industrial
companies, to residential consumers by the end of 2001.
Soderberg told Reuters the timetable is subject to the governor's approval.
"I have no indication that he is uncomfortable with the schedule, but we will
meet to discuss all issues on deregulation," he said.
The state PUC has studied the power problems Nevada's neighbour California
has grappled with since electricity deregulation went into effect in 1998.
Soderberg said, however, that California's problems, which are based mainly
on supply and demand factors, don't necessarily mean that Nevada will delay
further.


I will need to make these changes in Sitara.  On some of these deals it will
require me to go in and copy the ticket to a new ticket to move December 2000
forward.  These changes will be made this afternoon.  If you have questions
or concerns please call met at X3-3048.

---------------------- Forwarded by Elizabeth L Hernandez/HOU/ECT on
12/05/2000 07:50 AM ---------------------------

Cyndie Balfour-Flanagan@ENRON
12/04/2000 05:21 PM
To: Elizabeth L Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda S Bryan/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: CES Deal Clean-up

Listed below are deals for which we have rec'd consent to assignment, but are
still showing in Sitara as CES deals. Please make the necessary changes.

CP Name (as showing in Sitara)  'New' CP Name   Deal #  Date Consent Executed
CES - Entergy New Orleans , Inc  Entergy New Orleans, Inc  140327  08/09/00
CES - Entergy New Orleans , Inc  Entergy New Orleans, Inc  140330  08/09/00
CES - Entergy New Orleans , Inc  Entergy New Orleans, Inc  140332  08/09/00
CES - Entergy New Orleans , Inc  Entergy New Orleans, Inc  140334  08/09/00
CES - Entergy New Orleans , Inc  Entergy New Orleans, Inc  140336  08/09/00
CES - Entergy New Orleans , Inc  Entergy New Orleans, Inc  140337  08/09/00
CES - Flash Gas & Oil Southwest Inc.  Flash Gas & Oil Southwest Inc. 263609
08/03/00
CES - Hunt, Lydia    Hunt, Lydia   263650  09/06/00
CES - James E. Brummage   James E. Brummage  220339  05/05/00
CES - Lakeland, City of   Lakeland, City of    142035  08/07/00
CES - Lakeland, City of   Lakeland, City of    142036  08/07/00
CES - Lakeland, City of   Lakeland, City of    142037  08/07/00
CES - Ochs Bros.    Ochs Bros.   229857  05/19/00


In case you hadn't seen it, your pal Vikram's taking some pretty hard knocks right about now.  Hope all is well.
Best,
Jeff
Consumer Groups, Calif PUC Question Pwr Contract Validity
LOS ANGELES (Dow Jones)--Two California consumer groups have asked California Attorney General Bill Lockyer to investigate whether some state electricity contracts should be nullified because of a possible conflict of interest held by one of the state's negotiations, according to a press release Monday.
The Utility Reform Network and Consumers Union asked Lockyer to examine whether income earned from energy companies by consultant Vikram Budhraja presented a conflict of interest, because he may have been involved in contract negotiations with those companies
We believe there is ample evidence for the Attorney General to investigate whether some of the state's electricity contracts were made in violation of California's conflict of interest laws," said Bill Ahern, senior policy analyst with Consumers Union West Coast Regional Office. "If the Attorney General finds that a contract was made in violation of the law, it must be set aside as void."
Three weeks after Budhraja's January hire date, Williams Companies (WMB <http://quicken.excite.com/investments/quotes/?symbol=WMB>, news <http://quicken.excite.com/investments/news/?symbol=WMB>, msgs <http://quicken.excite.com/investments/discuss/?symbol=WMB>) won a $3.4 billion contract to provide power to the state over 10 1/2 years. Budhraja disclosed in mid-August that his company, the Electric Power Group, was paid more than $10,000 by Williams during the previous 12 months. Budhraja was hired by the California Department of Water Resources to negotiate power contracts, but hasn't said which generators he dealt with in the weeks before the Williams contract was signed.
"It is reasonable to assume that Budhraja may have been involved in the negotiations that led to the Williams contract," Ahern said. "It is also likely that there are more detailed records and evidence in existence, which only a subpoena or search warrant may uncover."
The groups also are concerned that Budhraja may have held a conflict of interest due to his potential involvement in negotiating a $3.9 billion contract with Allegheny Energy Inc. (AYE <http://quicken.excite.com/investments/quotes/?symbol=AYE>, news <http://quicken.excite.com/investments/news/?symbol=AYE>, msgs <http://quicken.excite.com/investments/discuss/?symbol=AYE>) while he owned stocks in energy companies, according to the release.
The Attorney General's office recently said it doesn't plan to investigate conflicts of interest involving energy contract negotiations. No one at the office could be reached for comment Monday.
The California Public Utilities Commission is also petitioning federal regulators to throw out some of the state's $43 billion in long-term energy contracts, the San Francisco Chronicle reported Monday.
The CPUC has argued in filings with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission over the past three months that energy companies took advantage of the state's energy crisis to negotiate high-priced contracts, according to the report. The average price of power under the contracts is $69 a megawatt-hour, more than double peak electricity prices last week.
CPUC lawyers have filed challenges before the FERC on deals negotiated with Scottish Power (SPI <http://quicken.excite.com/investments/quotes/?symbol=SPI>, news <http://quicken.excite.com/investments/news/?symbol=SPI>, msgs <http://quicken.excite.com/investments/discuss/?symbol=SPI>) unit PacifiCorp, Alliance Colton LLC, Sempra Energy (SRE <http://quicken.excite.com/investments/quotes/?symbol=SRE>, news <http://quicken.excite.com/investments/news/?symbol=SRE>, msgs <http://quicken.excite.com/investments/discuss/?symbol=SRE>) and Calpine Corp. (CPN <http://quicken.excite.com/investments/quotes/?symbol=CPN>, news <http://quicken.excite.com/investments/news/?symbol=CPN>, msgs <http://quicken.excite.com/investments/discuss/?symbol=CPN>), according to the report.
Budhraja disclosed in August that he owned as much as $10,000 in Scottish Power stock while a $1 billion long-term contract with subsidiary PacifiCorp was being hammered out. The state signed the 10-year contract July 6. Budraha sold his stock July 30. State officials say Budhraja had nothing to do with the deal, according to the report.


Bob,

I guess you need to make sure that this is the same well that they nominated
during bidweek.  If it is, then we do need to change the price to GD.  If it
is a new well behind the meter, you can either create a new deal ticket for
this piece, or create a pricing tier on the old ticket.

D

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Robert Cotten                           03/21/2001 11:42 AM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: FIRST DELIVERY - RODESSA OPERATING CO.

Daren,

Please read this memo and the one dated 2/21/01 from Vance.  He told me all
new production should be entered at IFHSC.  The deal in question is 634075.
Do you want it changed to Gas Daily?  Please advise.  Thanks.

Bob

---------------------- Forwarded by Robert Cotten/HOU/ECT on 03/21/2001 11:02
AM ---------------------------
From: Vance L Taylor/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/19/2001 02:24 PM
To: Tom Acton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robert Cotten/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Hesse/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donald P
Reinhardt/ENRON@enronXgate, Susan Smith/ENRON@enronXgate, Melissa
Graves/ENRON@enronXgate, Cynthia Hakemack/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: FW: FIRST DELIVERY - RODESSA OPERATING CO.

Tom/Bob,

The following production is now on-line and a ticket should be created and
entered into sitara based on the following:

Counterparty   Meter   Volumes  Price    Period  Global No.
HESCO Gathering Co., LLC 9876   85mmbtu/d  100% GD less $0.17  3/13 - 3/31
96057368

FYI, Susan will create and submit a committed reserves firm ticket for the
remaining term of the deal beginning with the month of April.  Additionally,
this is a Producer Svcs. deal and should be tracked in the IM Wellhead
portfolio... attached to the gathering contract.

Thanks,

vlt
x3-6353

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Buckley, Esther
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 12:14 PM
To: Carriere, Molly; Cernosek, Clem; Consemiu, Donna; Cook, Robert; Camp,
Howard; Hesse, Lisa; Hlavaty, Nathan; Wayne E Lightfoot/HOU/ECT@ENRON; McKay,
James; Smith, Mary; Schneider, Steve HPL; Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT@ENRON;
Walters, Michael; Zivley, Jill; Johnson, Mary Jo; Wynne, Rita; Allen, Lauri;
Jones, Cheryl; Hansen, Reid; Giron, Darron; Winfree, O'Neal; Susan
Smith/HOU/ECT@ENRON; Bryan, Gary; Hanks, Gary; Donald P
Reinhardt/HOU/ECT@ENRON; Vance L Taylor/HOU/ECT@ENRON; Baumbach, David;
Cotten, Robert; Riley, Brian; Austin, Jeff; Hakemack, Cynthia; Kenne, Dawn;
Csikos, Lisa; Fosdick, J R; Rodriguez, Carlos; Gomes, Stephanie; Clynes, Pat;
Acton, Tom; Walker, Robert; Weissman, George; Harris, JoAnne; Sweeney,
Christy; Tisdale, Earl; Farmer, Daren
Subject: FIRST DELIVERY - RODESSA OPERATING CO.

See attached letter


Vector Pipeline will be purchasing line pack gas for gas day November 17,
2000. Please see attached document.

(See attached file: Offer to Purchase Nov. 17.doc)
Keith Irani
Manager, Marketing Services
Vector Pipeline
416 495-5960
keith.irani@cgc.enbridge.com
 - Offer to Purchase Nov. 17.doc


I have a heavy meeting/conference call schedule.  To be honest with you, I'm
a bit unclear on who is doing what with this.  Any advice/insight?

Kay

John Schwartzenburg@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
08/23/2000 01:28 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott
Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: Re: Invitation - Westinghouse/Gleason iss (08/24/2000 12:30:00 PM
CDT)

Yeh, finally figured it out. I am trying to get out of town tomorrow, and
this is on top of some other hurry-up stuff, so I will likely miss. Scotty
will be there. Any chance youguys cna talk and geton the same page, or define
differences, before then?

To: John Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: Invitation - Westinghouse/Gleason iss (08/24/2000 12:30:00 PM CDT)

Couldn't tell if you saw this...
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 08/23/2000 01:24
PM ---------------------------

John.Normand@enron.com@enron.com on 08/23/2000 11:47:29 AM
Sent by: Arlene.Chapman@enron.com
To: Mitch.Robinson@enron.com, Kay.Mann@enron.com,
John.Schwartzenburg@enron.com, Scott.Dieball@enron.com, Bob.Greene@enron.com,
Dennis.Alexander@enron.com, Brian.D.Barto@enron.com, Gavin.Gaul@enron.com,
Mark.Dobler@enron.com, Ross.Newlin@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Invitation - Westinghouse/Gleason iss (08/24/2000 12:30:00 PM CDT)

  (superscript: New meeting request from John Normand)

                08/24/2000 12:30 PM Local Time
                08/24/2000 02:00 PM Local Time

  Title:        Westinghouse/Gleason issues CR#5C1 - Lunch served
  (J.Normand, M.Robinson, K.Mann, J.Schwartzenburg, S.Dieball, B.Greene,
  D.Alexander, B.Barto, G.Gaul, M.Dobler, R.Newlin))
  Location:     -No room information available-

  Chair:        John Normand/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

  To (required):   Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron
  cc (optional):

     John Normand/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT wants you to attend a meeting.

On        08/24/2000 12:30:00 PM CDT
For       1 hour 30 minutes
With:          John Normand/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT (Chairperson)
          Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron (Invited)
          Kay Mann/Corp/Enron (Invited)
          John Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT (Invited)
          Scott Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT (Invited)
          Bob Greene/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT (Invited)
          Dennis Alexander/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT (Invited)
          Brian D Barto/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT (Invited)
          Gavin Gaul/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT (Invited)
          Mark Dobler/NA/Enron (Invited)
          Ross Newlin/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT (Invited)

   Westinghouse/Gleason issues CR#5C1 - Lunch served (J.Normand,
M.Robinson, K.Mann, J.Schwartzenburg, S.Dieball, B.Greene, D.Alexander,
B.Barto, G.Gaul, M.Dobler, R.Newlin))


Attached is the Enron Americas GasTrading violation memos for  Maturity Gap
Risk and VaR for June 18, 2001.  The Office of the Chairman for Enron
Americas is responsible for printing out a hard copy of this memo, signing it
and returning the hard copy to Chris Abel at 3155a, who will forward it to
RAC to obtain their signature.

Thank You


Edison Won't Accept Changes To Calif Rescue Deal -Exec  ????
Updated: Thursday, April 19, 2001 05:40 PM?ET ??
?
By Jason Leopold

Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES

NEW YORK (Dow Jones)--Edison International (EIX, news, msgs) unit Southern
California Edison isn't willing to modify the rescue agreement it reached
last week with the state in order to convince lawmakers to support the plan,
a senior Edison International executive told Dow Jones Newswires Thursday.

On Wednesday, Gov. Gray Davis, in a meeting with Senate Democrats, said he
was willing to consider amendments to the proposal, which has been criticized
by Republicans and Democrats as a utility bailout at consumers' expense. The
Edison executive, however, warned against tinkering.

"This has been negotiated to the hilt," the executive said. "The MOU, as
negotiated is a balanced deal. The negotiated agreement we entered into with
the governor is no different than the agreement in principle" reached in late
February.

The terms of the deal, signed last week by Davis and Edison International
Chief Executive John Bryson, call for the state to buy Southern California
Edison's 12,000 miles of transmission lines for $2.76 billion and allow the
utility to issue bonds backed by ratepayers so it can recoup $5.5 billion in
unrecovered power costs.

The Edison executive said the memorandum of understanding is non-negotiable
and should be accepted by legislators "as-is."

Senate President Pro Tem John Burton, however, told reporters Wednesday that
many aspects of the Edison deal would have to be amended, particularly the
securitization package. State Sen. Debra Bowen, D-Redondo Beach, chair of the
Senate energy committee, agreed.

"It probably would take less time to list the things that don't have to be
changed in the MOU," Bowen said Thursday. "If it's a take it or leave it
proposal, it's a pretty simple choice for me."

If lawmakers don't pass legislation to implement the buyout by Aug. 15, the
deadline set in the agreement, the utility could find itself dragged into
involuntary bankruptcy proceedings by creditors, the executive said.

"I think we'll have big (problems)" if legislation isn't passed by Aug. 15,
the executive said. "We got all these creditors out there, and no one knows
how long they'll forbear."

Bankruptcy Would Worsen Crisis -Executive

Some lawmakers think ratepayers and taxpayers would be better off with
Southern California Edison in bankruptcy.

"I still don't see how ratepayers could be any worse off with (SoCal Ed) in
bankruptcy than they would with the governor's plan," Bowen said.

Sen. Joe Dunn, D-Santa Ana, said a filing would take the burden of the
company's cash-flow crisis off of legislators.

"A Bankruptcy Court judge would make the decisions without political
interference," said Dunn, who still wasn't convinced the state will benefit
from the deal.

Moreover, lawmakers have said Davis' transmission-line buyout doesn't make as
much sense now that PG&E Corp. (PCG, news, msgs) unit Pacific Gas & Electric
has sought bankruptcy-law protection as an alternative to continuing
negotiations with the state.

The Edison executive, however, warned that another utility bankruptcy would
be a "black eye" for California.

"I think the practical questions are... what are the alternatives here?" the
executive said. "Is the state going to allow another utility to go bankrupt
and choose the path of years and years of litigation?"

If the utility winds up in bankruptcy, the executive said, "the crisis gets a
lot worse, because there is not only a shortage of supply, but the power grid
begins to decline."

At the same time, if the state were to become the owner of the utility's
transmission lines and the power lines owned by Sempra Energy (SRE, news,
msgs) unit San Diego Gas & Electric, a purchase it is now negotiating, it is
almost guaranteed that a Bankruptcy Court judge would approve the sale of
PG&E's power lines to the state as well, the executive said.

"If the state were to buy Edison's and SDG&E's lines, it would be the
inevitable purchaser of PG&E's transmission lines," the executive said. "One
of the first things a bankruptcy judge will look at is the sale of assets.
And if the state purchased Edison and SDG&E's lines, it would be in the
strongest position to buy PG&E's system as well."

In addition, the Edison executive said, even without PG&E's transmission
lines, the state would still have substantial control of the grid in Southern
California, which has much better access to new generation sites being
developed.

"Sixty-eight percent of all new generation capacity approved or in the
process of being approved can link directly to Southern California Edison's
transmission system," the executive said.

Lawmakers, however, remain skeptical.

"It's a deal that every Edison shareholder and creditor loves, because it's
financed 100% by ratepayers," Bowen said. "But it's not in the best interest
of the state or in the best interest of Edison's ratepayers."

SoCal Ed Can't Pay QFs Money Owed Due To Cash Crunch  ????
Updated: Thursday, April 19, 2001 05:35 PM?ET ????

By Jason Leopold

Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES

NEW YORK (Dow Jones)--Edison International (EIX, news, msgs) unit Southern
California Edison is unlikely to pay more than $900 million in past due power
bills any time soon to the state's small independent power producers the
utility buys electricity from because it "simply (doesn't) have the dollars
to do that," a senior executive with Edison International told Dow Jones
Newswires Thursday.

"We wish to pay them going back," the executive said. "But we simply don't
have the dollars to do that."

The executive said utility officials are meeting with some of the owners of
the so-called qualifying facilities on the issue of back payments and new
contract prices.

Many of the state's QFs, gas-fired and renewable energy producers, have been
off-line for several months due to SoCal Ed failing to pay its past due power
bills to the companies.

The power producers said they owe millions to natural-gas suppliers who have
refused to sell them the commodity until they pay their bills.

Last week, SoCal Ed paid the QFs $206 million for power produced on a forward
basis. PG&E Corp. (PCG, news, msgs), which recently filed for Chapter 11
bankruptcy protection because of $8.9 billion in unrecovered power costs,
paid the QFs $34.6 million for forward power sales.

However, the QFs said the issue of past-due payments needs to be addressed
before they return their plants to service. About 2,000 megawatts in QF
generation remained off-line Thursday because of the back-payment issue. Last
month, the loss of 3,000 MW in QF generation contributed to two days of
statewide rolling blackouts.

The Edison executive said the company can only pay the QFs for power going
forward, as ordered by state regulators last month, and the utility will pay
all of its creditors once it's restored to financial stability.

California Regulators May Provide Some Relief

But the state's 688 QFs, which provides the state with one-third, or about
9,500 MW, of its total supply, may get some relief on the issue of back
payments from the California Public Utilities Commission.

The commission voted unanimously Thursday to start an investigation into the
reasons some QFs have remained off-line and whether they have violated their
contractual obligations with the utilities, despite the fact that they have
been paid on a forward basis.

Commission President Loretta Lynch said, "I do think...we need to take a hard
look at whether utilities pay certain QFs that are on the brink of bankruptcy
for back payments. Back payments are a critical part of the mix and are key
to preventing some QFs from meeting contractual obligations."

But the ruling has some hiccups.

At least 20 QFs have sued both utilities seeking the right to sell their
power on the open market until PG&E and SoCal Ed become creditworthy.

The PUC wants to try and stop that, which has infuriated the 12 or so members
of the Renewable Energy Creditors Committee, made up of wind, solar and
biomass energy producers.

They said the commission shouldn't try to stop them from trying to sell their
power on the open market.

"In criticizing QFs for seeking to sell power on the open market, the
(investigation) is criticizing alternative providers for trying to survive,"
the creditors committee said in a statement. "The committee views the order
as the latest attempt by the PUC to squeeze renewable and other QFs into
oblivion."

-By Jason Leopold; Dow Jones Newswires; 323-658-3874;
jason.leopold@dowjones.com


NOTE:  YOU WILL RECEIVE THIS MESSAGE EACH TIME YOU ARE SELECTED AS A REVIEWER.

You have been selected to participate in the Year End 2000 Performance
Management process by providing meaningful feedback on specific employee(s).
Your feedback plays an important role in the process, and your participation
is critical to the success of Enron's Performance Management goals.

To complete requests for feedback, access PEP at http://pep.corp.enron.com
and select Perform Review under Performance Review Services.  You may begin
providing feedback immediately and are requested to have all feedback forms
completed by Friday, November 17, 2000.

If you have any questions regarding PEP or your responsibility in the
process, please contact the PEP Help Desk at:

Houston: 1.713.853.4777, Option 4
London:  44.207.783.4040, Option 4
Email: perfmgmt@enron.com

Thank you for your participation in this important process.

The following is a CUMULATIVE list of employee feedback requests with a
status of "OPEN."   Once you have submitted or declined an employee's request
for feedback, their name will no longer appear on this list.

Review Group: ENRON
Feedback Due Date: Nov 17, 2000

Employee Name                   Supervisor Name                 Date Selected
-------------                   ---------------                 -------------
FAWCETT, JEFFERY C              JESS K HYATT                    Nov 01, 2000
LINDBERG, LORRAINE              JESS K HYATT                    Oct 31, 2000
LOHMAN, THERESE K               JESS K HYATT                    Oct 30, 2000
MERCALDO, VERNON M              LEE C FERRELL                   Oct 26, 2000
STOKES, CHRISTINE A             JESS K HYATT                    Nov 01, 2000


Hello all!

  Tomorrow is Julie Kearney's last day with Enron before she moves on to brighter opportunities!  Please join us at the Pilsner Room for Happy Hour drinks & food to wish Julie a wonderful farewell and good luck. Julie will be there from 4 pm 'til whenever.  Hope to see you there!


Good to hear from you.
After a great F, had an okay G.  Held a lot of term length on the risk/reward
play.  Figured if we got no weather, all the customer and generator buying
would be my stop.  It was.  Amazing that for the drop in price in H, the
strips have really gone nowhere.  just a big chop fest.
i here your arguments, but think they are way exagerated.  Agree with 1.5-2
bcf/d more supply. Call it 2 with LNG.  Imports from Canada should be
negligible.  Now let's assume price for the summer is $4.  No switching, full
liquids extraction, methanol and fertilizer running.  Electric generation
demand, considering problems in west and very low hydro, around 1.5 bcf/d
greater this year with normal weather.  Means you have to price 2 bcf/d out
of market.  Don't think $4 does that.  What level did we start really losing
demand last year?  It was higher than 4.   concerned about recession in
industrial sector thats occuring right now.
Think gas is fairly valued here.  Dont think we're going to 7.  But I think
fear of market considering what happened this past year will keep forward
curve very well supported through spring.  we're already into storage
economics so the front goes where the forward curve wants to go.

slafontaine@globalp.com on 02/26/2001 04:48:06 PM
To: jarnold@enron.com
cc:
Subject: mkts

its been a while-hope all is well. not a great few weeks for me in ngas-not
awful just nothing really working for me and as you know got in front of
march/apr a cupla times, no disasters.
   well im bearish-i hate to be so after a 4 buck drop but as i said a month
ago
to you-and now pira coming around. 5.00 gas is a disaster for the natgas
demand.
now production up strongly y on y...you guys agree on the production side?
  i know youve been bullish the summer-think im stll in the minority-but here
you go, we have y on y supplly up 2/bcf+ demnad loss 3.5bcf/d, 5.5 bcf/day y
on
y swing . then i submit as we started to see due huge rate increases R/C
demandd
energy conservation will be even more dramatic this summer which will effect
utilty demand/power demand ulitmately.  if pira rite we lost 1.56 in jan for
this factor i say it cud be bigger this summer as ute loads increase, power
pxes
rise and consumers become poorer. there will be more demand flexibilty in the
summer part in the midcon and north as AC is more of a luxury item than heat.
i
say 5-6% lower use in residentail/utilty power consumption due rationing is
another .7/1bcf/d loss.
  put all this together we wud build an addional 1284 apr thru oct on top of
last years 1715  build basis last year temps and todays prices. takes us to
3.6
tcf or so. what am i missing my man-summer has to go to 4 bucks or lower to
restore demand??? thots.

as far as that other thing, the p&c its still alive, shud know more soon and
ill
keep you posted.


----- Forwarded by Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT on 02/26/2001 04:04 PM -----

	David Portz
	02/26/2001 03:37 PM

		 To: Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Reagan Rorschach@ENRON
		 Subject: Latest Clarksdale Proposal

Forwarding revised Mississippi munis proposal, as discussed.

----- Forwarded by David Portz/HOU/ECT on 02/26/2001 03:35 PM -----

	Reagan Rorschach@ENRON
	02/26/2001 01:31 PM

		 To: David Portz/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Latest Clarksdale Proposal

David,

Thanks for your help.  See attached.

Reagan


TWanda, please print for me, including attachments.  Thanks.  Michelle

---------------------- Forwarded by Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT on 09/25/2000 03:24
PM ---------------------------

Rick Johnson@ENRON
09/25/2000 02:48 PM
To: Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Falcon Due Diligence

Michelle, Attached are the summary reports and tasking letter that I had
compiled for Falcon,  Peter indicarted that the due diligence and internal
review was being strickly limited, since he is now sharing info with you, I
wanted you to have the stuff I have commented on.  Rj.


That's your FAVORITE joke!  That was a really lame joke...in fact it was
pathetic.  Remind me never to take you to an open mike at a comedy
club...actually I don't think you'll ever have to remind me!


Hi!

I would like to introduce you to a new service that you would find useful:
http://www.jobreviews.com

JobReviews.Com offers interview, salary, and job position reviews so that
any current or aspiring job hunter can get the inside scoop on actual
interview scenarios, salary offers, and prospective jobs.

I think this service is especially appropriate during this time of year
since the recruiting season is in full swing!

Check it out, and if possible, please forward this e-mail to your friends.

Thank you!

Julie Bard
Marketing Associate, JobReviews.com

JobReviews.COM

OUR MISSION

-We want our users to get the best job possible.  Through the generosity of
our users, they have shared their personal job, interview, and salary
experiences so that each job hunter has an accurate picture of what a
job or interview scenario is like.  This service is useful because quite
often people are misinformed about an actual job's prospects.  By the time
they
sign the hiring contract, it's too late to back out!

FEATURES
-INTERVIEW REVIEWS from people who have gone through the
process themselves

-SALARY REVIEWS featuring information from actual job offers

-JOB POSITION REVIEWS detailing what a job is actually like

-Solutions to REAL management consulting case interview questions

-MESSAGE BOARDS and CHAT ROOMS to discuss jobs and
job hunting

-PROFESSIONAL TIPS for writing resumes, interviewing, and
negotiating salaries

-Links to the employers

-RECOMMENDED READING LIST suggesting the best job hunting,
management consulting, investment banking, and business school books
and guides available

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, simply reply to this e-mail with the
words
"remove" in the subject header.


- Quotes 0110.xls


Amitava,

Thank you for the detailed info on the required data and thoughts on its
scope.  I'll discuss it with Mike and Eric this morning.  Also agree that
we'll almost assuredly save money in the long run by building a more robust
model off more comprehensive data to start with.

Cheers,
Scott

Amitava Dhar
26/04/2001 21:23
To: Mike Mumford/LON/ECT@ECT, Eric Kirkpatrick/EU/Enron@Enron, Scott
Salmon/EU/Enron@Enron
cc: Iris Mack/ENRON@enronXgate, Vasant Shanbhogue/Enron@EnronXGate, Vince J
Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Craig Chaney/Enron@EnronXGate

Subject: Short Term Private Firm Model: Static historical
snapshot+performance data for model development

Mike, Scott, Eric,

After brainstorming and discussing further on data here, we think that our
final specifications for modelling data requirement need to be as follows:
We need bankrupt, default and nondefault (which covers nonbankrupt) accounts
with 4 quarterly observation snapshots and 12 months performance following
the latest snapshot.  Monthly performance indicator need to be available for
the entire 12 months performance period.  We will need all the bankrupt and
default accounts and comparable sample of good accounts with weights.
For the purpose of model validation, we will need data with above specs
covering 16 months of performance.  This means that we will need rolling (4
quarterly snapshots + 12 months performance) data for 4 monthly shifts:

Input snapshots           Performance
1999 March end, 1999 June end, 1999 September end, 1999 December end   12
month end performance for Jan 2000 through Dec 2000
1999 Feb end, 1999 May end, 1999 August end, 1999 November end    12 month
end performance for Dec 1999 through Nov 2000
1999 Jan end, 1999 Apr end, 1999 July end, 1999 October end     12 month end
performance for Nov 1999 through Oct 2000
1998 December end, 1999 Mar end, 1999 June end, 1999 September end    12
month end performance for Oct 1999 through Sep 2000

We will need bankruptcy chapterwise indicator, if available during the
performance period.  Our definition of default is either bankruptcy or 90+
days delinquency on any trade credit.
We have also discussed the cost aspect and we think considering the big
picture, it makes sense to spend  the extra amount to get the right data for
analysis.
Please let me know your thoughts.  This will require D&B to give us a
modified quote and we could possibly move forward quickly.

Regards,
Amitava


FYI

Vince
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 01/31/2001
03:06 PM ---------------------------

Melinda McCarty@ENRON
01/31/2001 02:06 PM
To: Christie Patrick/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: degiacic@wharton.upenn.edu, jhenders@newpower, Vince J
Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Wharton Tiger team #3

I have reserved conference room 32C2 for Thursday, Feb 1, Feb 8, and Feb 15
from 3:30 - 5:30
John to teleconference in tomorrow (Feb 1) call 713-853-9554

Please let me know if Wharton is using a different number from last week so
that I can inform the scheduling people

Melinda
x31641

	Christie Patrick@ECT
	01/30/2001 06:34 PM

		 To: Melinda McCarty/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 cc: jhenders@newpower@EES, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT,
degiacic@wharton.upenn.edu
		 Subject: Re: Wharton Tiger team #3

Melinda,

Would you please coordinate John Henderson into the Thursday videoconference?
Thanks!

--Christie.
---------------------- Forwarded by Christie Patrick/HOU/ECT on 01/30/2001
06:31 PM ---------------------------

Mohn Henderson@NEWPOWER

01/30/2001 04:13 PM

Sent by: Melissa Corley@NEWPOWER
To: Christie Patrick/HOU/ECT@ECT@EES
cc: jhenders@newpower@EES, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melinda
McCarty/Corp/Enron@Enron, degiacic@wharton.upenn.edu
Subject: Re: Wharton Tiger team #3

John would prefer to join the Thursday call via teleconference.  If you could
provide the dial in number he will call in.

Thanks,

Melissa Corley

John Henderson

	Christie Patrick@ECT
	01/30/2001 03:50 PM

		 To: jhenders@newpower@EES, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Melinda McCarty/Corp/Enron@Enron, degiacic@wharton.upenn.edu
		 Subject: Wharton Tiger team #3

Hi John and Vince!

John, hopefully you received my voice mail regarding the matter set forth
below.

I'm in NY now and won't  return until Thursday morning.  Perhaps it would be
easiest for John to come to the video conference on Thursday (if he's in
Houston) or via telephone if he's travelling??

Whatever  you both think is best..please let me know!

My assistant, Melinda McCarty, is setting up the call location at the Enron
Building, as well as the dial-in number with Donna Piazze at Wharton.

Melinda, please include John in the distribution of the video conference
location.

Thanks!

---------------------- Forwarded by Christie Patrick/HOU/ECT on 01/30/2001
03:43 PM ---------------------------

"DeGiacinto, Clayton" <degiacic@wharton.upenn.edu> on 01/30/2001 02:00:07 PM
To: "'Christie.Patrick@enron.com'" <Christie.Patrick@enron.com>
cc: "Feerick, Dennis" <dennisf@wharton.upenn.edu>, "Lessar, Stephen"
<lessars@wharton.upenn.edu>, "Vittal, Maheshram" <mvittal@wharton.upenn.edu>,
"Bassal, Omar" <bassalo@wharton.upenn.edu>, "Cummins, Marc"
<marcjc@wharton.upenn.edu>
Subject: Wharton Tiger team #3

Christie,

As we talked last Thursday via video teleconference, we are planning to
narrow our scope to focus on a marketing/promotion plan for NewPower
including value-added products and services for the future.  Before we talk
again on Thursday, we would like to speak with John Henderson again to see if
he recommends any specific items he would like us to address.

We are having trouble contacting him and wonder if you could facilitate a
phone meeting between us, or if it would be best to include him in our next
video teleconference.  We are available the next two days at 1pm and 4pm
Houston time.

We understand that John is a very busy person, and we appreciate any help you
can give in getting us together to ensure our work is commensurate with his
expectations.

Thanks,

Enron Team 3 (Retail)


Chris,

 What is the latest with PG&E?  We have been having good discussions
regarding EOL.
 Call me when you can. X37041

Phillip


Give Us Your Feeback and
	You Could Win Cool Cash

At Enron Federal Credit Union, we are continually looking for ways to
improve, and bring you the products and services that help simplify your
life, like on-line banking and e-Statements.  To ensure we continue to offer
you the newest and most innovative financial products on the market, please
take 2 minutes to answer this short survey found at the following address:

   http://home.enron.com/efcu/survey

When we have received your completed survey, your name will be automatically
entered into a drawing to win $200 cash if you are a member, or $100 cash if
you are not a member.  Deadline for entries is Wednesday, July 26, 2000.
Your responses will be sent in confidence directly to me.  We appreciate your
time and your opinions.

Jack McAdoo
President and CEO
Enron Federal Credit Union


Hi Rusty,

Here's my only comment, which I sent directly to Karen.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 07/25/2000 12:01
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kay Mann                           07/25/2000 12:01 PM

To: karen.way@piperrudnick.com
cc:

Subject: Ledford agreement

Karen,

I have in hand the Ledford agreement.  My only comment is that on its face it
does not appear to limit the Ledford's to the relief described (no
sole/exclusive remedy clause).  Does that occur by operation of law in
Illinois?

Thank you for your assistance.

Kay


Dave, we need to get this moving before the coal group starts occupying the
space.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 01/19/2001
09:32 AM ---------------------------

David W Delainey
01/19/2001 09:28 AM
To: Doug Leach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Randal Maffett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael J
Beyer/HOU/ECT@ECT, George McClellan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A
Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, W David Duran/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: coal plants

Guys, I am in complete agreement on the strategy.  This has been discussed
for some time, Dave Duran and his group have distinct goals to move this
strategy forward in 2001.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 01/19/2001
09:30 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Doug Leach                           01/19/2001 08:19 AM

To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: coal plants

fyi--see attached
---------------------- Forwarded by Doug Leach/HOU/ECT on 01/19/2001 08:23 AM
---------------------------

	From:  Doug Leach                           01/16/2001 05:26 PM

To: Michael J Beyer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Randal Maffett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Briggs/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: coal plants

Since Randy knows alot about power by wire I guess I under estimated the
costs/feasibility of my mine mouth strategy. Still seems to make sense to
promote clean buring coal plants to reduce America's dependence on foreign
oil or straining a maxed out natural gas system. Is this something we should
have Tom Briggs in the Enron Washington, DC office push?
---------------------- Forwarded by Doug Leach/HOU/ECT on 01/16/2001 05:22 PM
---------------------------

Randal Maffett
01/16/2001 04:58 PM
To: Doug Leach/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: coal plants

B'fast Friday looks fine, it's on the calendar!

Re: the coal strategy, you're exactly right.  There is however one major
impediment.  While locating the plant near/at the source (i.e., mine-mouth)
will ease transport costs for coal, there aren't many major coal mines
located in the prime market zones for power.  The transmission (wires) grid
was not built to accomodate wholesale bulk trading/transport the way gas does
and the impediments to expanding the grid are enormous (infinitely more so
than building new plants).  For example, the average lead time to permit (not
built, just permit) a high-voltage power line is 5-7 years!  As a result, a
medium sized line (345kv, 200 miles) can cost upwards of $1-2 billion!  That
was the most frustrating part of the 18 months I chased this stuff.  While
the basic solutions appear to be so logical, the business (the utilities),
regulatory and environmental regimes are so backwardated in their thinking
that breaking in was basically impossible.  Unless we're willing to put a
billion $ at risk for 5-7 years on a merchant basis!  (NOT!)  Hell, you can't
even get $100 million for your refinery deal!  Solving the power supply
shortage is only part of the equation and your coal idea is legitimate as new
technology can burn coal almost as clean as gas.  But until the FERC and
state PUCs force the issue of expanding the grid to become a more "fungible"
and integrated transmission system, the utilities will continue to operate in
their vacuum as these transmission barriers are the only things protecting
their turfs.  Even though some have given the appearance of forming
RTO's/ISO's (regional transmission organizations or independent system
operators) this is simply a facade of utilities banding together to cover
each other's asses.  The assets are still owned by the utilities themselves
and the RTO/ISO has no authority to mandate expansion or anything requiring
capital investment, other than routine maintenance, etc...  That's the whole
genesis of what I was trying to preach to FERC, various utilities who
"appeared" to be more forward thinking about dereg, etc...  Basically, you'd
be trading one evil (transport for fuel) for another (transport for
electrons) and I'm afraid the latter is infinitely more complex (engineering
wise) and costly.

See ya' Friday!

	From:  Doug Leach                           01/16/2001 04:22 PM

To: Randal Maffett/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: coal plants

is this something Enron should revisit and not be so shortsighted? Beth
scheduled us for breakfast on Friday morning at the Doubletree. Does that
work for you?
---------------------- Forwarded by Doug Leach/HOU/ECT on 01/16/2001 04:21 PM
---------------------------
To: Doug Leach/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marc De La Roche/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael J
Beyer/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: coal plants

Doug -Mike Beyer worked on this idea last summer.  The problem we had was our
need to focus on shorter term opportunities - and the bodies that would be
required to do a good job.  I know that ENA is / was looking at some
brownfield opportunities - but I haven't heard of any developments.

Thanks,

George

	From:  Doug Leach                           01/16/2001 04:10 PM

To: George McClellan/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marc De La Roche/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: coal plants

George,

I'm sure I am way over simplifying this, but in light of current natural gas
prices and the past success ENA had building six natural gas power plants
wouldn't the same template work for building coal fired power plants in the
US? I'm sure the choosing of potential sites and the overall permitting
process is far more severe than the natural gas process, but it would seem
Enron could and should be a leader in proposing new coal plants. Wouldn't it
make sense to build a state of the art coal power plant closer to the actual
coal supply, whereby we avoid the ever increasing transportation costs and
then supply power by wire to surrounding states. States rich in coal reserves
are always looking for more jobs which a new power plant would create and
therefore may speed the permitting process along. Building the power
transmission infrastructure across state lines may be cost prohibitive, but
has this approach been analyzed by the coal group?

Regards,
Doug


Sources report that the bond authorization will be put to a vote today

The bridge loan financing bill will put to a vote today in the California
Assembly.  The Republicans are currently in caucus until 3:30 PST and then
will go to the floor for a vote.  The current situation is very fluid, but
sources now indicate that the bill would pass with a simple majority vote,
lacking the two-thirds needed for an immediate bond issuance.  If this is the
case, the bill would not take effect for 90 days and the state would be
forced to abandon its proposed bridge loan plans.  Absent of last minute
financial rescues by Davis or a new longer bridge loan package (unlikely)
Socal could seek voluntary bankruptcy.  The main problem would then be the
waiting period for financial relief from the state through the transmission
line purchase or other assistance.

There is an outside chance that Republican defectors could precipitate from
the current caucus.  There is extreme pressure on the Republicans from Davis
and Angelides.  If the bill failed due to lack of Republican support, it
would provide Davis the opportunity to blame Republicans for on-going
expenditures of $70M/day (power purchases), and a possible bankruptcy by
Socal.  The last Republican who gave support to a democratic bill (AB 1X),
Representative Bill Campbell, lost his job.  Sources also confirm that
Democrats have not met with Republicans on the bond issuance since last week.


Please see below information for Stan Horton.

	Enron Technology

	From:  Outlook Migration Team                           05/24/2001 04:59 PM

To: Jan Bass/NA/Enron@Enron, Steve Sauer/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Amy Clemons/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Audrey Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elsie Lew/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Joy Werner/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kim Durham/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie
Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Brown/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark Confer/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Melissa K Ratnala/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Self/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rhonda
Robinson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thu T Nguyen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vivien Pham/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Cindy Stark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: 2- SURVEY/INFORMATION EMAIL May 30th

Current Notes User:

To ensure that you experience a successful migration from Notes to Outlook,
it is necessary to gather individual user information prior to your date of
migration.  Please take a few minutes to completely fill out the following
survey. Double Click on document to put it in "Edit" mode. When you finish,
simply click on the 'Reply With History' button then hit 'Send'  Your survey
will automatically be sent to the Outlook 2000 Migration Mailbox.

Thank you.

Outlook 2000 Migration Team

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------

Full Name:        Stanley Charles Horton

Login ID:   shorton

Extension:   36177

Office Location:  EB5020

What type of computer do you have?  (Desktop,  Laptop,  Both)  Desktop only

Do you have a PDA?  If yes, what type do you have:   (None, IPAQ, Palm Pilot,
Jornada)  NONE

Do you have permission to access anyone's Email/Calendar?  Yes
    If yes, who?     Cindy Stark

Does anyone have permission to access your Email/Calendar? Yes
    If yes, who?     Cindy Stark

Are you responsible for updating anyone else's address book?  No
    If yes, who?

Is anyone else responsible for updating your address book?  Yes
    If yes, who?     Cindy Stark

Do you have access to a shared calendar?  Yes
    If yes, which shared calendar?    Cindy Stark

Do you have any Distribution Groups that Messaging maintains for you (for
mass mailings)?  Not sure????
    If yes, please list here:

Please list all Notes databases applications that you currently use:  NONE

In our efforts to plan the exact date/time of your migration, we also will
need to know:

What are your normal work hours?  From: 8:00AM     To:      5:00PM
Mondays through Fridays

Will you be out of the office in the near future for vacation, leave, etc?  No
       If so, when?        From (MM/DD/YY):      To (MM/DD/YY):


Where are you?  I'm on 6.
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


This is a copy of your message sent to travellingchick@talkmatch.com -->

Hi,

Received your email, thanks for writing me back.  Don't worry I can deal with sarcasm, I just didn't want to include everything as a "turn on" or people would think something was wrong with me.
And as far as the "No Extremist" goes, I really was at a lost for a title and came up with that last minute.  So, now that I've defended my bio, let me knit pick yours, just kidding.

I'm betting that with "Travelling Chick" as your title you must either travel a lot for work or really enjoy traveling, or both.  I travel a lot in my job, but it seems to come and go in spurts.  Right now we are gearing down for the Holidays, as well as other reasons, and I don't have any trips planned.

I read your profile, do you really do all those things; hiking, biking, etc?
When do you get your rest?  Why Vail's chair 10, is that where you blew out your knee, and can you still ski?  Tired of all these questions?  One more than I'll let you go.  What pets do you currently have that you would have to disclose at a later date?

Talk to you later!
Paul

*********************************************************

ADDITIONAL TIPS from Match.com:

Our anonymous re-mailer will strip away your real email address, so
that it will NOT appear in the 'From:' line.

You may also contact this person from their Match.com profile by
clicking 'Contact this person' and composing your message directly from the
site.

However:

* Check to ensure that your email address is not in the BODY of your
message as we are unable to remove these.

* Check to ensure that you REMOVE ANY AUTOMATIC SIGNATURE at the end of

your email. And note that you cannot use 'Cc:' or 'Bcc:' if you want
your email to remain anonymous.

Match.com does not monitor private email between members, nor are we
liable for the content of these messages. All members are bound by our
Match.com Service Agreement.


FYI---

Here is what I show so far for April baseload/term Katy flexible purchase gas:

Oasis meter #6780:

Aquila		10.000
Duke		20.000
Richardson	  1.312
Conoco	15.000

Total		46.312  Flexible

Lonestar meter #67:

Duke		47.850 (50.000 - 2.150 inflexible)
Mitchell	20.000
Crosstex 	(6.200)  (Baseload sale)

Total		61.650  Flexible

Thanks,
Mark
x33396


Please have your "needs improvement" reviews submitted to HR and Legal by
Friday,  January 19.  Let me know today if for some reason you will not be
able to complete them by that date.

Dutch - Can you get with Errol so that he can write the goals and
expectations portion of Sherry's review.

Thanks

Here are the names that I have:

De la Torre
Lee
Dawson
Salazar
Frank


Yes

From: Jeff Dasovich on 04/19/2001 03:45 PM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re:

Make sense for me to attend the meeting?

	Steven J Kean
	04/19/2001 12:31 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan M Landwehr/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Rosalee
Fleming/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Janel
Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT
		 Subject:

I got a voicemail fro Ken.  He would be happy to meet with Freeman.  He is
willing to work on other times, but suggested the following
After 3:00 on May 2nd (right after Ken's speech to the RGA) or late the day
before or in the morning of the second (to do this though he would have to
cancel his speech to the Texas Governor's business council but he is willing
to do this if necessary)
His least preferred alternative in this general time frame would be early
morning on the third.
Jeff -- could you coordinate with Rosie to get the time and place nailed down?


We need to be careful how we position this.  I'm concerned that this may be
perceived as Enron re-entering the residential market -- even though we're
proposing to supply SDG&E rather than direct end-use customers.  How does
this compare to the other eight offers SDG&E has received?

James D Steffes@EES
08/17/2000 01:38 PM
To: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Karen
Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES
cc:

Subject: SDG&E Offer

Attached is a write-up of a presentation on making a "public" offer in
SDG&E's territory for supplying their residential load.

If we are to do this, we need to probably have something ready by late August.

Any comments?
---------------------- Forwarded by James D Steffes/HOU/EES on 08/17/2000
03:35 PM ---------------------------

Melinda McCarty@ENRON
08/17/2000 03:07 PM
To: James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Marcia A Linton/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Presentation

Just in case you need this for future reference.  I played with it and gave
it a simple look.  (You can always delete if you don't like it.)

mm


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	phone interview w/ paul shuman 503-239-7639

Date:		1/30/2001
Time:		12:00 PM - 1:00 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


I would like to have a planning meeting tomorrow to begin coordinating the development of a strategic and tactical global plan with goal of being completed with that plan by Friday.  Let me know at your earliest convenience what time tomorrow works well for you.
Regards,
Jim


I spoke with Monica about this issue yesterday.

Robin

Chris Abel
02/22/2001 12:20 PM
To: Monica Hwang/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Robin Rodrigue/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Binh
Pham/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Basis Position Report

The gas group stopped publishing it to the website, but I am not sure if they
use the info for other purposes.  Maybe Robin or David can respond to that
issue.

Chris
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Abel/HOU/ECT on 02/22/2001 12:17 PM
---------------------------

MONICA HWANG@EES
02/20/2001 07:52 AM
To: Chris Abel/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Basis Position Report

Chris, most of the remaining people on the distribution list are EES
management.  Does Corp no longer require the Basis position report to be
prepared daily?  If so, we will no longer send it.

Thanks,
MYH

Chris Abel@ECT
02/16/2001 10:26 AM
To: Monica Hwang/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Re: Basis Position Report

You can take Michael Benien and myself off of the list, as we no longer use
this report.   Additionally, you should remove Rahmaan Mwongozi and Gabriel
Monroy as they no longer work in the gas group.  You might want to check with
the others to see if the report needs to continue going to them also.

Thanks,
Chris

MONICA HWANG@EES
02/14/2001 04:51 PM
To: Chris Abel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gabriel Monroy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael
Benien/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Neil Hong/HOU/EES@EES, Barend
VanderHorst/HOU/EES@EES, James Shirley/HOU/EES@EES, Jess Hewitt/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Warren Prihoda/HOU/EES@EES, Robin Rodrigue/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rahmaan
Mwongozi/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Binh Pham/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marco Smith/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Basis Position Report

Please find the attached EES Basis Position Report.

Thanks,
Monica


You guys have probably already noodled on this, but if you haven't, maybe it's worth organizing a meeting next week to discuss the above storage project and benefits / risks to TW.

For instance:

Risks:
Red Lake connection to Kern cuts into TW forward haul market

Rewards:
expands TW's Park n' Ride capabilities (we offer more capability and back it with a storage position)
better PnR rates over the short term than what the storage can offer
more backhaul business on TW mainline (i.e. Citizens Utilities)
Compression ops agrmt w/ Aquila

Let me know if you'd like to get together for a brainstorm session.  Bids are due to Aquila by 3/15 and there are some financial caveats to discuss.


---------------------- Forwarded by Larry F Campbell/NA/Enron on 09/14/2000
04:44 PM ---------------------------

Don Baughman@ECT
09/14/2000 12:35 PM
To: Richard Hrabal/HOU/ECT@ect, Chad Starnes/Corp/Enron@Enron, Juan
Hernandez/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cyril Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Larry F
Campbell/NA/Enron@Enron, John Kinser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wayne
Herndon/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Keller Mayeaux/Corp/Enron@Enron, Joe
Stepenovitch/Corp/Enron@Enron, Matt Lorenz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jason
Choate/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Dean Laurent/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Fwd: Fw: Salsa Dance

 - salsa_1.mpe


I don't really know other than he was out for some family time. It's going okay, trying to not give back too much in this chop around rally.


Shirley,

Please keep it on your radar screen.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 05/12/2000
05:15 PM ---------------------------

Sue Wadsworth@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
05/11/2000 05:16 PM
To: Mark Keeter/Contractor/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Vince J
Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Bloomer/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Ravi Thuraisingham/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Arshak Sarkissian/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Scheduling a Meeting - Important - Please read

Scott Yeager has requested I set up a meeting for Mark Keeter to present to
the group his findings for the 6 month study of Managing Global
Network/Application Service Platform and include managing QoS end to end.

How does Tuesday May 23 in the morning look for everyone?
Mark, how long do you need I will schedule the conference room for.
Also please let me know if anyone else should be invited.

Sue Wadsworth
EB4590A
713-853-5105


Forgot to attach the file.  Here it is.

	Jeff Dasovich
	09/24/2000 12:53 PM

		 To: Kimberly Kupiecki <kkupiecki@arpartners.com>
		 cc: dwindham@uclink4.berkeley.edu, jcjcal02@aol.com,
Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com, jjackson@haas.berkeley.edu
		 Subject: Re: Next Financial Reporting Case

Kim:

Been having horrible computer problems.  (Just got switched over to Windows
2000---I hate Microsoft; break it up into a million itty bitty pieces.)

Haven't had a chance to read what you wrote.  Attaching what I cobbled
together yesterday.  Will also take a look at what Mr. Jackson put together.
You should feel free to go ahead and meld mine and yours, etc.  I'm at work.
Will be here until  about 11-11:30.  After that, if you need me, page me at
888.916.7184.  And thanks a million for pulling it together.

Best,
Jeff


why maybe

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Huble, Amanda
Sent:	Wednesday, June 06, 2001 10:01 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

somewhere for a drink maybe

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Wednesday, June 06, 2001 10:01 AM
To:	Huble, Amanda
Subject:

where are we going


I still think an additional organizational announcement is necessary- I can
explain further when you so desire. Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron on 04/11/2001
04:20 PM ---------------------------

Richard Shapiro
04/11/2001 04:15 PM
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Enron Europe Regulatory Affairs Announcement

From: Enron Europe Office of the Chairman@ECT on 04/11/2001 05:37 AM
Please respond to Enron Europe Office of the Chairman
Sent by: Enron Europe General Announcement@ECT
To: ECT Asia Pacific, ECT Dubai, ECT Europe, Enron VPs and MDs 1, Enron VPs
and MDs 2, Enron Executive Committee
cc:

Subject: Enron Europe Regulatory Affairs Announcement

After nearly five years in London, Mark Schroeder will be returning to the US
on April 11th to join the North American Coal Business with responsibility
for origination in the utility sector.  Under Mark,s leadership, his team has
made significant contributions towards Enron Europe,s &first mover8 advantage
and its status as the leading new entrant in the liberalizing pan-European
energy markets.  We wish him well in his new commercial role.

With Mark,s departure, the day-to-day management of the Government &
Regulatory Affairs Department in Europe will rest with Peter Styles, Paul
Dawson, Paul Hennemeyer, and Doug Wood. Nick O,Day will continue in his
current leadership capacity in Japan.  Each of these five individuals and
their groups will now jointly report to the business heads and to Rick
Shapiro, in the Government & Regulatory Affairs team in Houston. Rick Shapiro
will continue to manage Government Affairs for the Americas.  While the team
members responsibilities will vary from time-to-time in response to shifting
commercial priorities, as well as the need to support other Enron Wholesale
Services' business units from time-to-time, the general areas of
responsibility will be as follows:

Peter Styles, based in Brussels, will continue to have responsibility for our
EU and Netherlands advocacy.  Paul Hennemeyer will lead efforts in the German
speaking countries (Germany, Austria, Switzerland) as well as France and
Belgium. Peter and Paul will report to Eric Shaw.  While seconded to the
commercial team in France, Philip Davies will address Nordic market issues on
an ad hoc basis and also report to Paul on these issues.

Paul Dawson will lead our UK, Spain and Italian power regulatory efforts as
well as the gas regulatory work in the UK.  Doug Wood will support the
Continental Gas team and the Central and Southeastern Europe Origination
efforts, while also addressing the UK Climate Change Levy.  Doug's role in
gas will continue to be supplement, and not to supplant, the efforts of each
of the team members' geographic responsibilities noted on the organisation
chart. Paul and Doug will report to Richard Lewis locally.

Nick O,Day will also continue to report to Joe Hirl in Japan.

Other regulatory support provided by Mark Schroeder will be addressed in
another organizational announcement that will be sent
out from Government & Regulatory Affairs in Houston.  Attached is the revised
organization chart that now reflects the Government & Regulatory Affairs
organization in Enron Europe.

John Sherriff & Michael Brown

Please click on the link below to view the Regulatory Affairs organisational
charts for Europe and Japan.

Link to organisational charts


Please attend this meeting to discuss Information for Banks w/ Sally Beck.


Start Date: 12/16/01; HourAhead hour: 17;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.


if its early i can

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Wednesday, February 06, 2002 10:01 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

i think that laura and i might go have drinks tonight if you want to come you can.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Wednesday, February 06, 2002 9:58 AM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

ok we will do it another time

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Wednesday, February 06, 2002 9:55 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

late sleeper?  i don't think that i am going to be able to go to lunch.  :(

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Wednesday, February 06, 2002 9:54 AM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

yep just got in

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Wednesday, February 06, 2002 9:54 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:

hey!  are you here?


Is anybody up for going to Two Rows tonight?  I promise I won't get AS drunk
tonight.  We'll be there around 8:00.  Be there or be SQUARE!.

Eric


From my mouth to his ear!

	Justin Boyd
	02/28/2001 12:23 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Updated Enron Europe Dept Structure Chart

,,,any chance of your passing that on to jeff skilling?!

J

From: Tana Jones on 28/02/2001 12:18 CST
To: Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Updated Enron Europe Dept Structure Chart

You are absolutely by far, no comparisons, the best!

	Justin Boyd
	02/28/2001 12:02 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Updated Enron Europe Dept Structure Chart

tana, mark

voila!

j
---------------------- Forwarded by Justin Boyd/LON/ECT on 28/02/2001 18:05
---------------------------

Tracy Foy
01/02/2001 17:22
To: ECT Europe Legal
cc:

Subject: Updated Enron Europe Dept Structure Chart

Please find attached updated structure chart reflecting recent promotions and
new starters.

Many thanks

Tracy


Sounds great.  When do we sign up?

Best,
Jeff


Forgot the attachment.

----- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 11/03/2000 01:55 PM -----

	James D Steffes
	11/03/2000 01:55 PM

		 To: Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Steve Kean Issues

Joe --

Include these with your opening language and send to FERC.

Jim


> PERFECT!!!!!!!!!
>
> ** Proprietary **
>
>   A husband and wife are getting all snugly
> > > in bed. The passion is heating up.  But then the wife stops and says
> "I
> > > don't feel like it, I just want you to  hold me." The husband says
> > > "WHAT??" The wife explains that he must not  be in tune with her
> > emotional
> > > needs as  a Woman. The  husband realizes that  nothing is going to
> > happen
> > > tonight and  he might as  well deal with it.
> > >
> > >  So the next day the husband takes her  shopping  at a big
> department
> > > store.  He walks around and has her try on  three very  expensive
> > outfits.
> > > She can't  decide. He tells his wife to take all  three of them.
> Then
> > > they go over and  get matching shoes worth $100 each.
> > >  And  then they go  to the Jewelry Dept.  where she gets a set of
> > diamond
> > > ear  rings. The wife  is so excited. She  thinks her husband has
> flipped
> > > out-but she does  not care.
> > > She goes for  the tennis bracelet. The husband says  "but you don't
> > even
> > > play tennis, but  OK if you like it then let's get it."  The wife is
> > > jumping up and down so  excited she cannot even believe what  is
> going
> > on.
> > > She says "I am ready to  go, lets go to the cash register."
> > > The  husband  stops and says, "No, honey I  don't feel like buying
> all
> > > this stuff  now"
> > > The  wife's face goes blank. He says "Honey - I just want you to HOLD
> > > this stuff for  a while." The look on  her face is indescribable and
> she
> > > is  about to  explode and the husband says,
> > >
> > >  "You must not be in tune with my  financial needs as  a Man."
> > >
> >
>
>


Correction:
This length is for Monday only.

JMF
---------------------- Forwarded by John M Forney/HOU/ECT on 11/10/2000 06:16
PM ---------------------------
From: John M Forney on 11/10/2000 04:11 PM
To: Portland Shift
cc:
Subject: Length at Montana System (Colstrip) to be sold on 11/13

Please remember to sell off this length on Sunday and Monday.

JMF
---------------------- Forwarded by John M Forney/HOU/ECT on 11/10/2000 06:13
PM ---------------------------

Cara Semperger
11/09/2000 07:46 AM
To: Portland Shift, John M Forney/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Donald Robinson/PDX/ECT@ECT, Sean Crandall/PDX/ECT@ECT, Diana
Scholtes/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Malowney/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Length at Montana System (Colstrip) to be sold on 11/13

Good Morning,

Smurfit Stone is ramping down their plant by 5 mw's beginning at HE 6 on
11/13.  The source for them is PGE@Colstrip.  Please sell off this additional
5 mw's for HE6 thru HE24 on the 13th.

The Smurfit Deal number is 268656.1

The Portland Deal number is  403522.1

The real time position manager will reflect this length.

Thanks,

Cara


Lorna,

Thanks for following up on this!