TO: Houston Area Employees Participating in the Domestic Medical Plan Benefits

You may have recently received communication from United HealthCare (UHC)
concerning Memorial Hermann Health Systems' (MHHS) decision to terminate
their contract with UHC  in the Houston/Beaumont area.  This communication
also included the names of physicians who will be dropped from the network
due to this action.  It is our intent to help you understand the situation.

It is our understanding that Memorial Herman Health Systems asked for a 40%
increase in fees - a substantial increase that would have been passed on to
you and Enron!  When United HealthCare attempted to negotiate with a counter
proposal, Memorial Hermann cancelled their contract.

While this contractual arrangement was between the hospital system and UHC,
Enron continues to support UHC in their ongoing contract negotiation
efforts.  At this time, it is only UHC which has been affected, however, it
is our understanding that Cigna has also been contacted by the hospital group
and may be in contract negotiations at this time as well.

Many doctors have obtained admission privileges to other area hospitals
within the UHC Network or have contracted directly with UHC including those
with admission privileges to The Woodlands, Sugarland and Clear Lake
Hospitals, to name a few.  In a further effort to limit disruption to our
affected employees and families who are enrolled in the UHC Network or EPO
options, Enron has authorized UHC to process claims incurred between
September 28 and December 31, 2000 as if the termination of the Memorial
Hermann Health Systems from the network had not occurred and In-Network
benefits applied.  Office visits will have a $10 copayment and all other
charges will be covered at 90%.  Hospital admissions will still need to be
pre-certified with UHC.

These steps have decreased the number of participants' affected by Primary
Care Physician disruption from 1,050 to 127.

If You Need Medical Attention:  You or your doctor/hospital must call UHC's
customer service number so proper benefits can be verified.  In some cases
the hospital or doctor may request payment at the time service is performed.
If this should happen, please obtain an itemized statement and submit it to
UHC with a claim form for prompt reimbursement.  Claim forms can be obtained
by calling 1-800-332-7979 or in Houston at 713-853-7979 ( press 1).

Open enrollment materials will be coming soon.  Take this opportunity to
consider your elections for 2001.

United HealthCare and Enron HR are committed to assisting Enron employees
through this transition.  We will communicate any  further developments that
may impact you or your family.


Kate,

Donnie is looking at this.  As long as Willie is pulling in the requested
information, we can set up the pub code in EnPower.  Jenny.

   Kate Symes                04/02/2001 12:32 PM

To: Jenny Latham/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: New Pub Posting Request

I haven't heard anything back. I spoke with Willie on the phone Friday
afternoon, and he said the best way to get this done quickly would be to send
out an e-mail. I was actually just about to call and check on the request,
but if you have a moment, could you find out where it's at in the chain of
commmand?

Thanks,
Kate

	From:  Jenny Latham                           04/02/2001 10:18 AM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Willie Harrell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey W White/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donald Wayne
Vinson/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: New Pub Posting Request

Has this been addressed?

   Kate Symes                03/30/2001 03:50 PM

To: Willie Harrell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey W White/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jenny
Latham/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Matt Motley/PDX/ECT@ECT, Michael M Driscoll/PDX/ECT@ECT
Subject: New Pub Posting Request

Please add to this a request for the Dow Jones COB Sunday Index price.
Thanks.

Kate
---------------------- Forwarded by Kate Symes/PDX/ECT on 03/30/2001 01:52 PM
---------------------------
   Kate Symes                03/30/2001 01:13 PM

To: Willie Harrell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey W White/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jenny
Latham/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Matt Motley/PDX/ECT@ECT, Michael M Driscoll/PDX/ECT@ECT

Subject: New Pub Posting Request

The West traders have requested a new pub posting code to allow them to do
deals against the Dow Jones Palo Verde Sunday index. In particular, Matt
Motley, our Long Term Southwest trader, has executed a deal today for Cal'01
through Cal'06 at the Palo Verde index price. It runs all days and all hours,
so we need to enter three legs - one at the on peak price, one at off peak,
and one at Sunday price. The 24-hour Sunday price is the only option missing
from EnPower. Matt has asked that we get this pub code in as soon as possible
so his deal can be entered and calced tonight. Please let me know what you
can do.

Thanks,
Kate Symes
Trading Support
503-464-7486


Some thoughts, observations, suggestions:

1. Advantages to the single contract:

Don't need a consolidation agreement, so we don't have to negotiate one.
Better from a liability standpoint.
Easier to administer.

Is there any reason we can't go with a single contract?

2. Repayment/prepayment

I'm working with Steve on the letter agreement.

3.  Assignment to Mitsui

Steve is confirming payment issues, and ability to comply with GE's requested
payment within 3 days of executing the contract.  This means that the
assignment and assumption needs to be executed contemporaneously with the GE
contract.  I have a call in to Rob Stevens to verify, in Stan's absence.
Peggy is checking on this, also.

4. Parent guaranty.

GE is requesting an Enron parent guaranty.  From a quick review of the draft
contract, it appears that a change in language will be necessary, since the
current version only requires a parent guaranty in the case of an assignment
to a certain class of assignees.  If I am correct, then I suggest consider
inserting new language that the parent guaranty will be due 30 days after
execution of the contract, so that Mitsui can provide the guaranty, if
necessary.

Kay

Jeff Blumenthal@ECT
06/02/2000 03:23 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Brian D Barto/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Steve
Irvin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Reynaldo Garcia/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Peggy
Banczak/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marc Sabine/NA/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Enron Monterrey/Vitro

Kay,

The division of contracts between an Onshore Agreement and an Offshore
Agreement is of no consequence to Enron Energia Industrial de Mexico, S. de
R.L. de C.V. ("EEIM") (which is wholly-owned by Enron North America Corp.)
Brian refers below to the fact that Rey Garcia and I spoke and decided that a
split of the contracts was necessary for Enron because of Mexican value-added
tax concerns.  At that time, however, the Enron entity that was to enter into
the contract(s) was Enron North America Corp., a U.S. corporation.  For
several Mexican tax reasons, we advised that the appropriate Enron entity to
enter into the contract(s) is EEIM, a Mexican entity.  Please contact me at
ext. 35777 if you have any questions.

Best regards,

Jeff

	From:  Kay Mann @ ENRON                           06/02/2000 01:46 PM

To: Jeff Blumenthal/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Enron Monterrey/Vitro

---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 06/02/2000 01:46
PM ---------------------------

Brian D Barto@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
06/02/2000 01:28 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Enron Monterrey/Vitro

Jeff and Reynaldo Garcia spoke on this subject at length, and Rey convinced
Jeff that spitting was necessary.  AT that time the Enron Contracting entity
was not specified to be Energia...    If you want to unsplit the documents it
will add additional time in excess geting a consolidation agreement completed
I think.  Please include Rey in your quest for closure.  PS  GE is now OK
with the split.

I need help getting closure on the Consolidation Agreement.  I hope that we
do not invent other issues as well.


Here is a copy of the original email sent to you:

______________________________________________________________________________
___
I am contacting you on the recommendation of Pug Winokur, who is on our Board
of Directors.  Enron has formed an Advisory Council which consists of
academicians, public policy thinkers and media, together with Enron
executives.  I would like to invite you to address the group on E-Commerce
issues at our next meeting (Friday, September 8th in Houston).

Attached is a list of our Advisory Council members.

I think you will find this group interesting and thought provoking.

Please contact me at your earliest convenience at 713-853-1586.
__________________________________________________________________________

DEBORAH:   Please fax me Mr. Pandit's bio.  My fax number is 713-646-8160.

Also, would you email his presentation when you have it available.  Most
presenters use Power Point - but if you have different needs, please give me
a call at 713-853-1808.  The person to email the presentation to is Russell
Mitchell.  His email address is     russell.mitchell@enron.com

Thanks for your assistance.


Yahoo! News	Edit Breaking News Alerts - Yahoo!

	Breaking News Alert	 edit
WASHINGTON _ Bush to name Pitt to head SEC, official says.

	Click here!
	[IMAGE]

If you no longer wish to receive this alert, click here to unsubscribe.
If you have questions, send us feedback.

Copyright , 1994-2001 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved. Yahoo Privacy Policy


we hav e a tee time sat at herman for 11:40.


I guess I don't have strong feelings if a dash is written here or not but I
do care that a troubled situation receive the attention it requires to avoid
getting in deeper. There always seems to be reluctance in UK to have a dash
prepared, Steve always used a huge amount of energy on justifying the task.
We all know that if problem deals are not addressed they always get worse.
Maybe Michael could be led to "suggest" an alternative memo or approach. A
"problem deal" memo. If you all think a dash is the best approach do it and I
don't care if they don't sign it.

Once the website is functional, it will be helpful to have a complete history
of deals and having these kind of memos in dash format will aid this process.

One final thought, Michael is quite supportive of our effort and I think we
should pick battles carefully. Rick


Start Date: 4/28/01; HourAhead hour: 14;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042814.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 14 / Preferred:  50.00 / Final:  43.01)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/28/01
  TIE_POINT: FCORNR_5_PSUEDO
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_ERNIE
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 14 / Preferred:  50.00 / Final:  43.00)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/28/01
  TIE_POINT: MALIN_5_RNDMTN
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_ERNIE
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL


Chris,

Nancy and Mary took the budget news well.  Their response was "I don't care
what the number is as long as the sponsors are stepping up for it."
Frank also did not object.  Unfortunately, they are saying that the CCT/CUST
interconnection issue must be resolved before funding.  Their concern is that
if we sign then EPE will be subject to third party liability with members of
the grid.  They are willing to meet with us next week on the budget and the
ECA but Cliff is not availble until Thursday.  Can you make it later in the
week?

I'll keep you posted.

"Dutton, Chris CMJ SI-GPBF" <Chris.M.J.Dutton@SI.shell.com> on 12/05/2000
07:54:40 PM
To: "'Blanca.Bollom@enron.com'" <Blanca.Bollom@enron.com>,
"'Rob.G.Gay@enron.com'" <Rob.G.Gay@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: RE: CALL FROM ROB GAY ON WEDNESDAY

Rob,
I will be in a meeting most of the day but do call as it sounds urgent.  My
office line is redirected to my cell phone.

> Regards,
>
> Chris Dutton, GPBF
>
> Finance Adviser
> Shell International Gas Limited
> Shell Centre London SE1 7NA
> Tel: +44 207 934 6110
> Fax: +44 207 934 7515
> Mobile: +44 7884 475053
> E-Mail: Chris.M.J.Dutton@SI.SHELL.COM
>
>
>
> ----------
> From:  Blanca.Bollom@enron.com[SMTP:Blanca.Bollom@enron.com]
> Sent:  05 December 2000 19:58
> To:  Dutton, Chris CMJ SI-GPBF
> Subject:  CALL FROM ROB GAY ON WEDNESDAY
>
> Chris:
>
> Rob wanted me to let you know to expect a call from him tomorrow,
> Wednesday, about 8:00 a.m. (2:00p London).
>
> Blanca
>


NYMEX Membership Services
March 30, 2001
Notice # MS-22

NOTICE OF INTENTION TO TRANSFER

Please be advised that effective with the close of business, March 30, 2001,
he following member(s) have given notice of intention to transfer their sole
Membership within the Exchange:

Arthur H. Lamborn, Jr. (AHL-326)

Matthew Goss (GOSS-7351)

NOTICE OF INTENTION TO LEASE ORIGINAL MEMBERSHIP

Please be advised that effective with the close of business, March 30, 2001,
the following member(s) have given notice of intention to lease their sole
membership privileges:

Michael Coscia (CIA-4741)

SWITCH OF LESSOR

Please be advised that effective with the close of business, March 30, 2001,
the following member(s) will switch their lessor within the Exchange:

Ari Kempler (KEMP-3510)

Robert  Harmon, Jr. (RMON-319), In addition, Mr. Harmon will switch his
qualifying clearing member guarantee from Sterling Commodities Corp. to
Geldermann, Inc.

SWITCH OF STATUS

Please be advised that effective with the close of business, March 30, 2001,
the following member(s) will switch their status within the Exchange:

Vincent Lanci (SIGI-7910)

REINSTATEMENT OF MEMBERSHIP PRIVILEGES

Please be advised that effective with the close of business, March 30, 2001,
the following member(s) have reinstated their membership privileges:

Michael Tublin (TUBB-3249) as a Lessee Member with a qualified trader
guarantee provided by Pioneer Futures, Inc.

Thomas Fraser (TOMF-3374) as a Lessee Member with a qualified trader
guarantee provided by Pioneer Futures, Inc.

 Members and Member Firms have (10) days from the date of this notice to
advise the Corporate Secretary,s Office of any claims in accordance with Rule
2.51.

 Inquiries regarding the above should be addressed to the Member Services
Department (212) 299-2379.

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=tana.jones@enron.com&refdo
c=(MS-22)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


market_relations@nyiso.com writes to the NYISO_TECH_EXCHANGE Discussion List:

Dear TIE List Members

All current TIE list members have now been transitioned to the new
TIE list.  To ensure that everyone is transitioned properly,
messages will continue to be posted to both lists through this
week.  After the first of the year the old list will be disabled.

For your information:

New posting address:  nyiso_tie@lyris.nyiso.com

Old posting address:  nyiso_tech_exchange@lists.thebiz.net

If you have any questions, please call your Customer Relations
representatve or the Help Desk at 518-356-6060.

Regards,

Customer Relations


to unsubscribe from this list, see info at the end....
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
NEWS RELEASE
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sender: owner-peaker@energy.ca.gov
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: peaker@energy.ca.gov

For immediate release:  May 7, 2001
Contact: MaryAnn Costamagna  -- (916) 654-4989

Energy Commission Staff Completes Assessment
of Proposed Peaker Power Plant Project in Hanford

Sacramento - The staff of the California Energy Commission has
recommended approval of the proposal by GWF Power Systems Company for
a 95-megawatt peaker power plant at Hanford Energy Park in Kings
County.

The Hanford Peaker Project is a simple cycle, natural gas-fired power
plant proposed for construction and operation on a site immediately
adjacent to the existing GWF Hanford cogeneration plant, just north
of Idaho Avenue. If approved, the facility is expected to start
commercial operation August 1, 2001.

The Staff Assessment of this project can be viewed and printed from
the Energy Commission's Web Site at:

www.energy.ca.gov/sitingcases/peakers/hanford/documents

A site tour and informational hearing was held on the project on Friday,
April 20, 2001.

A Proposed Decision on the Hanford project, which will also be
available on the Energy Commission's Web Site, is being released
today.

The full five-member Energy Commission will consider the Proposed
Decision at its business meeting as follows:

THURSDAY, MAY 10, 2001
Beginning at 10 a.m.
California Energy Commission
1516 Ninth Street
Hearing Room A
Sacramento, CA
(Wheelchair Accessible)

The proposed Hanford Park Peaker Project applied to the Energy
Commission's emergency siting process to meet this summer's
electricity needs. The goal of the emergency process is to license
power plants that can be on-line by September 30, 2001, without
sacrificing the public's health or safety or California's environment.

Typically, peaker power plants are simple-cycle generators that can
be constructed in a relatively short period of time, readily
connected to the existing electricity transmission and natural gas
system, and dispatched quickly to meet peak electricity demands.

The Commission's Public Adviser, Roberta Mendonca, can assist
interested individuals and organizations and provide information on
participating in the Commission's emergency siting process. Persons
may contact Ms. Mendonca by e-mail at <pao@energy.state.ca.us>. For
information regarding proposed projects in Northern California, call
(877) 602-4747. For information about projects proposed in Southern
California, call (800) 273-4459.

Information about the proposed project is available on the Energy
Commission's Web Site at:

www.energy.ca.gov/sitingcases/peakers

###

--
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* * * * * * *
Bob Aldrich
Web Development Team
California Energy Commission
916-654-4989

To unsubscribe from this list, please go to:

http://www.energy.ca.gov/listservers/

Or simply send an e-mail to majordomo@energy.ca.gov
and in the body of the e-mail, type in

unsubscribe (name of this list)

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* * * * * * *


things are well, slowly ramping it up and gegtting back into it

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hayden, Frank
Sent:	Friday, April 12, 2002 11:07 AM
To:	Parks, Joe
Subject:	RE: var

For VAR 95 using a Delta gamma approach
1.645 * position * price * daily vol = VAR

Remember daily vol is implied vol divided by sqrt of time or 16 in this case.

How do you like your new digs?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Parks, Joe
Sent:	Friday, April 12, 2002 7:58 AM
To:	Hayden, Frank
Subject:	var

hey, how are you? can you send me an example of how you callculate var on contracts.

for example: price is 3.10, 100 contracts, vol. 60%

"SHOW ME THE MATH"

JOE
832-851-2821


	<TITLE>Weather Inbox</TITLE>
        <base HREF="http://www.weather.com/">

                Mike's weather for 11/27/2001

                  Update Profile | Unsubscribe

                Local Outlook for

                Houston, TX

								5 DAY FORECAST

                              Hi

								Lo

                Today

                T-Storms

                   70°F

                   53°F

		    Wed

                T-Storms

                   59°F

                   43°F

		    Thu

                Partly Cloudy

                   59°F

                   45°F

		    Fri

                Mostly Sunny

                   68°F

                   52°F

		    Sat

                Partly Cloudy

                   70°F

                   50°F

                            DETAILED FORECAST

                        Today:	 Cloudy with thunderstorms. High around 70F. Winds E to NE 5 to 10 mph. Chance of precipitation 60%. Rainfall amounts generally a quarter of an inch. Heavier amounts in localized areas.

                        Tonight:	 Cloudy with showers and thunderstorms. Low near 53F. Winds N to NW 5 to 10 mph. Chance of precipitation 70%. Rainfall amounts generally a half an inch. Locally heavier amounts possible.

                        Tomorrow:	 Cloudy with thunderstorms likely. High near 59F. Winds NW 15 to 20 mph. Chance of precipitation 80%. Rainfall amounts near a half an inch. Higher amounts possible in some storms.

                        Tomorrow night:	 Cloudy with rain likely. Low near 43F. Winds NW 10 to 15 mph. Chance of precipitation 60%. Rainfall exceeding one inch possible.

						WEATHER HEADLINES

					Tornadoes and blizzard conditions

					A powerful storm system is bringing severe storms, heavy snow, and bitter cold to the central U.S.

						More details

                        MAPS

                     Doppler Radar Maps

					  Other Maps

		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 CURRENT CONDITIONS
AND 10 DAY FORECAST

                            Houston, TX

                IN THE SPOTLIGHT - Weather In Your Calendar

There's no easier way to keep an eye on the weather than seeing it in your calendar!

Receive a FREE rolling 5-day weather forecast delivered automatically into your electronic calendar (desktop or PDA) by Infuzer technology.  Forecasts for your chosen cities are automatically added to the top of your daily calendar, as an "all day event", and are continually updated in the background when you are online.  Select from 30,000 locations worldwide, including all US cities.

Sign up NOW!  It's FREE!

                HEALTH

Are you a human barometer?

   Changes in the weather have long been associated with joint pain, headaches and other health concerns.  weather.com's new Aches and Pains section can help you be prepared.

		Aches & Pains Features

		Air Quality Reports

		Personal Allergy Profile

                 click to enlarge

                SITE LINKS

	    For more information on additional topics choose from the following links:

                Home and Garden
                School Day
                Weather In Your Calendar

            You
              are receiving this e-mail because you requested The Weather Channel
              to send newsletters and announcements to you at mike.grigsby@enron.com.

              If you feel that you have received this message in error, or if
              you no longer wish to receive these messages, you can unsubscribe
              anytime.

              If you have any questions or concerns about how we use your personal
              information, please read our privacy
              policy.

              We welcome all feedback from our members, please
              send us your comments or questions.

              Copyright (c) 1995-2001, The Weather Channel Enterprises,
              Inc.


Jeff - just brief comments:

1) I'd like MRW to affirm that this revenue does not have to be grossed up
for federal income taxes.  Usually revenue requirement does have to get that
gross-up.
2) the 7% discount rate presumes securitization, is that correct?  So we need
to be clear that we are assuming securitization.
3) the percentage increases from other states is shaky.  These were in some
cases isolated utilities and not reflective of how much lower their rates are
to begin with.

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	02/26/2001 06:50 PM

		 To: skean@enron.com, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, mpalmer@enron.com,
Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John
Neslage/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron,
Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Leslie
Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Solve IOU Undercollection with a Mere 10% Average Rate Increase?

Greetings:

Please review the attached.  It's a summary I've put together of a very
lengthy analysis MRW did for us over the weekend.  I've also attached the
considerably lengthier MRW memo for those who'd like to see it.  The tables
included in the summary are pulled directly from the MRW memo.  The analysis
only addresses the utilities undercollection (i.e., solvency) and doesn't
address any additional increases that might result from DWR's buying
activities.

The Bottom Line
 By raising average rates 10% over a 10-year period, California could 1)
return the utilities to solvency, and 2) help close the  supply-demand gap by
providing customers with better price signals.
 California could achieve these goals under this new rate structure and at
the same time exclude one-third of residential  customers from any increases.
If California chose not to exclude any customers from the new rate structure,
California  would only need to raise average rates by about 8.8%.
 This level of increase is in line with increases enacted in other states
(e.g., Washington: 28-34%; Montana: 4.5-32%; Idaho:  6.0-24%; Nevada:
7-12.5%; New Mexico 12%).

We'll need to look at it critically and try to shoot holes in it before going
public with the numbers as part of our broader effort, but it offers a
reasonable benchmark against which to judge alternatives (like spending the
kids lunch money on crumbling, broken down transmission systems).

Please provide feedback as soon as possible, and perhaps, Paul we conclude
the MRW work on the agenda for discussion on tomorrow's daily conference call.

Best,
Jeff

 - Undercollection assessment final.doc


Dick, I have signed the DASH. Good job.

One comment, the DASH for Basic particularily the RAC comments was very
poorly written.  Please keep an eye on this for me.

Regards
Delainey


Michael is off school April 13 and 16.  I have 3 deals which are supposed to
close around then, so I'm not optimistic.  If possible, I will take at least
one of those days.

On the summer camp, if we use a camp by you, we will probably lose Charlotte
for the summer.  Does that matter to you?

Kay


Don,>

Hey there! Thanks for the indicative information  from Friday. I'm glad to hear that you survived the flood. Here is the most  updated copy of our methodology. Please feel free to forward it to your hourly  traders.

Thanks again,
Rachel Steffens
Power Markets Analyst
713-647-8490

 - All Hub Methodology.doc


Ken Lay wrote:

"Loyal -

I was really disappointed you and Lavonne were not able to make the Rees
reunion.  I was looking forward to catching up with both of you.

Our broadband business is doing great.  Just a few days ago, we announced a
video-on-demand service we will be providing with Blockbuster.  It has
created a lot of interest.

In general, my family is doing very well.  Linda and I now have six grandkids
(four new ones since the first of the year) plus Elizabeth's wedding.  Let's
stay in touch.

Ken"

Loyal Lay <loyal_lay@yahoo.com> on 08/05/2000 06:25:04 PM
To: klay@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Your E-mail address

Hi Kenny: Bonny sent me your E-mail address and
so I am trying it out. Sorry we could not make it
to the party. The temperature is very warm here
in Kansas today. I checked Enron stock recently
and it looks like it is doing fine. I am
particularly interested in your venture into the
fiber optics communications business and the
windpower. We sold our interest in the Cellular
business last year and I think the land line
company will be sold soon. We sold to Allied
Telephone Coimpany of Little Rock. Two other
engineers and myself put Kansas Cellular together
about 14 years ago. Then we built a fiber system
from East to West across Kansas. That was sold
with the Cellular. Take care of yourself-Loyal

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Kick off your party with Yahoo! Invites.
http://invites.yahoo.com/


Thanks for all your hard work!

Lunch will be provided on Wednesday, September 19, by Tim Belden and Chris Calger to everyone on the floor as a thanks for all you've done for Enron this month.  Enjoy!


Notice No. 01-92
March 14, 2001

TO:
All NYMEX Division Floor Members and Member Firms
All NYMEX Division Clearing Firms
All NYMEX Division Operations Managers

FROM:
Neal Wolkoff
Executive Vice President

RE:
Amendments to Delivery Rules Concerning Payment in the Heating Oil, Unleaded
Gasoline, Propane, Platinum and Palladium Futures Contracts
______________________________________________________________________________

  Please be advised that effective, Thursday, March 15, 2001, payment for
delivery of NYMEX Division energy contracts Heating Oil, Unleaded Gasoline
and Propane, as well as metal contracts Platinum and Palladium, may be
consummated by money wire if agreed upon by both clearing members.

  Currently, the above-mentioned contracts require payment by certified check
only.  These amendments will offer added flexibility through an additional
option to the clearing members upon mutual consent.  The amendments for the
relevant contracts are attached for your review.

  If you have any questions concerning this Notice, please contact Thomas
LaSala, Vice President, Compliance, at (212) 299-2897, or Nicholas Galati,
Director, Market Surveillance, at (212) 299-2920.

Attachment

(underlining indicates additions)

NY Harbor Unleaded Gasoline:

Rule 190.09(F)(2)  Delivery Day

 The buyer shall pay the seller at the office of the seller by certified
check by 12:00 noon of the business day following the receipt of the product,
or by 12:00 noon on the last business day of the delivery month, whichever is
earlier.  The amount of payment shall be based on volume delivered as
determined in accordance with Rule 190.02.  Should the inspector, appointed
under Rule 190.12, be unable to supply quantitative results prior to the time
established herein for payment of the product, a pro forma payment based on
42,000 U.S. gallons per contract shall be made.  Payment adjustments based on
actual quantity transferred shall be completed between Clearing Members by
12:00 noon of the first business day after receipt of the telexed Inspector,s
report but no later than the third business day after transfer of physical
product.  Alternatively, buyer and seller may mutually agree to effect
payment or adjustment, as otherwise prescribed in this Rule, by federal funds
money!
 w!
ire as a substitution for a certified check.

NY Harbor Heating Oil:

Rule 150.09(F)(2)  Delivery Day

 The buyer shall pay the seller at the office of the seller by certified
check by 12:00 noon of the business day following the receipt of the product,
or by 12:00 noon on the last business day of the delivery month, whichever is
earlier.  The amount of payment shall be based on volume delivered as
determined in Rule 150.02.  Should the inspector, appointed under Rule
150.12, be unable to supply quantitative results prior to the time
established herein for payment of the product, a pro forma payment based on
42,000 U.S. gallons per contract shall be made.  Payment adjustments based on
actual quantity transferred shall be completed between Clearing Members by
12:00 noon of the first business day after receipt of the telexed Inspector,s
report but no later than the third business day after transfer of physical
product.  Alternatively, buyer and seller may mutually agree to effect
payment or adjustment, as otherwise prescribed in this Rule, by federal funds
money wire as a subst!
it!
ution for a certified check.

Platinum:

Rule 90.08(G)  Delivery Day

 The buyer who receives a Notice of Intention to Deliver shall present it
before 12:00 noon of the following business day at the office of the seller
by whom it was issued with a certified check for the amount payable as shown
on the Notice of Intention of Deliver.  Upon the receipt of the certified
check, the seller shall give the buyer a depository receipt and, unless such
receipt was issued pursuant to Rule 90.10(a)(5) or (6), an assay certificate
which corresponds to the Notice of Intention of Deliver.  The seller must
endorse the depository receipt and set forth the date of endorsement.  The
day the buyer receives the stated documents shall be referred to as the
Delivery Day.  Alternatively, buyer and seller may mutually agree to effect
payment on Delivery Day by federal funds money wire as a substitution for a
certified check.

Palladium:

Rule 100.08(G)  Delivery Day

 The buyer who receives a Notice of Intention to Deliver shall present it
before 12:00 noon of the following business day at the office of the seller
by whom it was issued with a certified check for the amount payable as shown
on the Notice of Intention of Deliver.  Upon the receipt of the certified
check, the seller shall give the buyer a depository receipt and, unless such
receipt was issued pursuant to Rule 100.10(A)(5) or (6), an assay certificate
which corresponds to the Notice of Intention of Deliver.  The seller must
endorse the depository receipt and set forth the date of endorsement.  The
day the buyer receives the stated documents shall be referred to as the
Delivery Day.  Alternatively, buyer and seller may mutually agree to effect
payment on Delivery Day by federal funds money wire as a substitution for a
certified check.

Propane:

Rule 230.14(C)  Payment Date

 The buyer shall pay the seller at the office of the seller by certified
check by 12:00 noon of the second business day following completion of
delivery.  The amount of payment shall be based on the volume delivered as
determined in Rule 230.04.  If the seller requires multiple delivery dates,
payment for partial delivery shall be required for each portion of product
transferred.  The seller, upon receipt of payment, shall give the buyer all
appropriate documents necessary to transfer ownership of the product to the
buyer.  Alternatively, buyer and seller may mutually agree to effect payment,
as otherwise prescribed by this Rule, by federal funds money wire as a
substitution for a certified check.

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=tana.jones@enron.com&refdo
c=(01-92)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


NAME	TITLE	DOH	BADGE	HR REP	SUPERVISOR	CO/RC
Alba, Mary	Staff Tr Sup	8/21/00	yes	H.
				McLoughlin	Lisa Peterson
Dozier, John	Spec Tr Sup	8/21/00	yes	H.
				McLoughlin	Lisa Peterson
Edward, Williams	Spec Gas Ass	8/21/00	yes	H.
				McLoughlin	Lisa Csikos
 Melanie Harwell 	Spec	8/21/00		H.
				McLoughlin	Bryce Baxter
Audry O'Toole 	Spec	8/21/00		H
				McLoughlin	John Harrison


We are not seeking authorization at this time.


----------------------------------

This e-mail is sent by a law firm and contains information
that may be privileged and confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and notify us
immediately.

 - Revisions to Draft Senate Bill.doc


---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 03/21/2000
05:01 PM ---------------------------

"Southwest Airlines" <special-offers-admin@mail.southwest.com> on 03/21/2000
12:33:06 AM
Please respond to "Southwest Airlines"
<special-offers-admin@mail.southwest.com>
To: "Special Offers" <special-offers1@mail.southwest.com>
cc:  (bcc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT)
Subject: Southwest Airlines Internet Specials March 21, 2000

Southwest Airlines Click 'n SaveSM E-mail Update for
March 21, 2000
Please pass this great news on to your friends! To subscribe
to Southwest Airlines Click 'n Save E-mail Updates,
visit http://www.southwest.com/email/

Southwest Airlines Click 'n Save Internet Specials:
*****************************************************
Coast-to-Coast Internet Only Sale extended through
March 23, 2000.  For more details, visit:
http://www.southwest.com/hotfares/?src=click

Check out our Weekly Click 'n Save Specials below.
  21-day advance purchase
  Travel April 11, 2000 through August 5, 2000
  Roundtrip purchase and overnight stay required
  Purchase beginning March 21 through
  March 23, 2000, midnight PST.
  Scroll down for more details!
****************************************************
at http://www.southwest.com/hotfares/?src=click

Weekly Click 'n Save Specials

** These fares are valid for travel April 11, 2000
through August 5, 2000, except for May 26 and 29, 2000.
Ticketless travel must be purchased online at
www.southwest.com by midnight Pacific Standard Time
March 23, 2000. ** Please see Other Terms and
Conditions of these fares at the end of this e-mail.

The fares listed do not include airport-assessed passenger
facility charges (PFCs) of up to $12 roundtrip. Roundtrip
purchase and overnight stay are required. Fares do not
include a federal excise tax of $2.50 that will be imposed
on each flight segment of your itinerary. A flight segment
is defined as a takeoff and a landing.

Fares shown are each way based on roundtrip purchase

Albuquerque
$56 each way to/from Dallas Love Field
$62 each way to/from Las Vegas
$40 each way to/from Midland/Odessa
$97 each way to/from San Francisco
$39 each way to/from Tucson

Amarillo
$36 each way to/from Dallas Love Field
$61 each way to/from Houston Bush Intercontinental
$61 each way to/from Houston Hobby
$63 each way to/from Midland/Odessa
$62 each way to/from San Antonio

Austin
$36 each way to/from Dallas Love Field
$36 each way to/from Houston Hobby
$58 each way to/from Jackson
$59 each way to/from Little Rock
$51 each way to/from Oklahoma City

Baltimore/Washington
$52 each way to/from Birmingham
$50 each way to/from Chicago Midway
$54 each way to/from Detroit
$54 each way to/from Indianapolis
$64 each way to/from Jacksonville
$36 each way to/from Louisville
$34 each way to/from Manchester
$61 each way to/from Orlando
$34 each way to/from Providence
$61 each way to/from Tampa Bay

Birmingham
$52 each way to/from Baltimore/Washington
$60 each way to/from Cleveland
$62 each way to/from Houston Hobby
$34 each way to/from Louisville
$37 each way to/from New Orleans
$44 each way to/from Tampa Bay

Boise
$63 each way to/from Oakland
$36 each way to/from Reno/Lake Tahoe
$36 each way to/from Salt Lake City
$34 each way to/from Spokane

Burbank
$36 each way to/from Oakland
$44 each way to/from Reno/Lake Tahoe
$36 each way to/from Sacramento
$36 each way to/from San Jose

Chicago Midway
$50 each way to/from Baltimore/Washington
$36 each way to/from Columbus
$36 each way to/from Detroit
$65 each way to/from Hartford
$40 each way to/from Kansas City
$54 each way to/from Long Island (Islip)
$66 each way to/from Manchester
$43 each way to/from Nashville
$50 each way to/from Raleigh-Durham
$36 each way to/from St. Louis

Cleveland
$60 each way to/from Birmingham
$59 each way to/from Kansas City
$41 each way to/from Long Island (Islip)
$64 each way to/from Omaha
$45 each way to/from Raleigh-Durham
$44 each way to/from St. Louis

Columbus
$36 each way to/from Chicago Midway
$62 each way to/from Kansas City
$42 each way to/from Louisville
$54 each way to/from Nashville
$61 each way to/from Omaha
$61 each way to/from Tampa Bay

Corpus Christi
$38 each way to/from Houston Hobby
$40 each way to/from San Antonio

Dallas Love Field
$56 each way to/from Albuquerque
$36 each way to/from Amarillo
$36 each way to/from Austin
$36 each way to/from Houston Bush Intercontinental
$36 each way to/from Houston Hobby
$36 each way to/from Lubbock
$36 each way to/from Midland/Odessa
$36 each way to/from Oklahoma City
$36 each way to/from Tulsa

Detroit
$54 each way to/from Baltimore/Washington
$36 each way to/from Chicago Midway
$40 each way to/from Indianapolis
$59 each way to/from Kansas City
$42 each way to/from Louisville
$54 each way to/from Nashville
$61 each way to/from Omaha
$42 each way to/from St. Louis

El Paso
$62 each way to/from Las Vegas
$40 each way to/from Midland/Odessa
$58 each way to/from San Antonio

Ft. Lauderdale
$34 each way to/from Orlando
$50 each way to/from Raleigh-Durham

Harlingen (South Padre Island)
$38 each way to/from Houston Hobby

Hartford
$65 each way to/from Chicago Midway
$65 each way to/from Nashville
$48 each way to/from Raleigh-Durham

Houston Bush Intercontinental
$61 each way to/from Amarillo
$36 each way to/from Dallas Love Field
$48 each way to/from Lubbock
$52 each way to/from Midland/Odessa
$55 each way to/from Oklahoma City
$56 each way to/from Tulsa

Houston Hobby
$61 each way to/from Amarillo
$36 each way to/from Austin
$62 each way to/from Birmingham
$38 each way to/from Corpus Christi
$36 each way to/from Dallas Love Field
$38 each way to/from Harlingen (South Padre Island)
$48 each way to/from Lubbock
$52 each way to/from Midland/Odessa
$55 each way to/from Oklahoma City
$56 each way to/from Tulsa

Indianapolis
$54 each way to/from Baltimore/Washington
$40 each way to/from Detroit
$44 each way to/from Kansas City
$48 each way to/from Little Rock
$36 each way to/from St. Louis

Jackson
$58 each way to/from Austin
$66 each way to/from Louisville
$49 each way to/from Orlando
$62 each way to/from Raleigh-Durham

Jacksonville
$64 each way to/from Baltimore/Washington
$66 each way to/from Long Island (Islip)
$50 each way to/from Nashville
$42 each way to/from New Orleans
$34 each way to/from Tampa Bay

Kansas City
$40 each way to/from Chicago Midway
$59 each way to/from Cleveland
$62 each way to/from Columbus
$59 each way to/from Detroit
$44 each way to/from Indianapolis
$49 each way to/from Little Rock
$40 each way to/from Louisville
$88 each way to/from Manchester
$36 each way to/from Nashville
$36 each way to/from Oklahoma City
$34 each way to/from St. Louis
$36 each way to/from Tulsa

Las Vegas
$62 each way to/from Albuquerque
$62 each way to/from El Paso
$47 each way to/from Oakland
$61 each way to/from Portland
$36 each way to/from Reno/Lake Tahoe
$47 each way to/from Sacramento
$42 each way to/from San Jose

Little Rock
$59 each way to/from Austin
$48 each way to/from Indianapolis
$49 each way to/from Kansas City
$61 each way to/from Lubbock
$57 each way to/from Oklahoma City
$61 each way to/from San Antonio
$36 each way to/from St. Louis

Long Island (Islip)
$54 each way to/from Chicago Midway
$41 each way to/from Cleveland
$66 each way to/from Jacksonville
$54 each way to/from Louisville

Los Angeles
$36 each way to/from Oakland
$44 each way to/from Reno/Lake Tahoe
$36 each way to/from Sacramento
$36 each way to/from San Jose

Louisville
$36 each way to/from Baltimore/Washington
$34 each way to/from Birmingham
$42 each way to/from Columbus
$42 each way to/from Detroit
$66 each way to/from Jackson
$40 each way to/from Kansas City
$54 each way to/from Long Island (Islip)
$61 each way to/from New Orleans
$63 each way to/from Oklahoma City
$61 each way to/from Omaha
$45 each way to/from Raleigh-Durham
$61 each way to/from Tampa Bay

Lubbock
$36 each way to/from Dallas Love Field
$48 each way to/from Houston Bush Intercontinental
$48 each way to/from Houston Hobby
$61 each way to/from Little Rock
$57 each way to/from Oklahoma City

Manchester
$34 each way to/from Baltimore/Washington
$66 each way to/from Chicago Midway
$88 each way to/from Kansas City

Midland/Odessa
$40 each way to/from Albuquerque
$63 each way to/from Amarillo
$36 each way to/from Dallas Love Field
$40 each way to/from El Paso
$52 each way to/from Houston Bush Intercontinental
$52 each way to/from Houston Hobby
$57 each way to/from Oklahoma City
$57 each way to/from Tulsa

Nashville
$43 each way to/from Chicago Midway
$54 each way to/from Columbus
$54 each way to/from Detroit
$65 each way to/from Hartford
$50 each way to/from Jacksonville
$36 each way to/from Kansas City
$54 each way to/from Omaha
$57 each way to/from Orlando
$57 each way to/from Tampa Bay

New Orleans
$37 each way to/from Birmingham
$42 each way to/from Jacksonville
$61 each way to/from Louisville
$44 each way to/from Orlando
$62 each way to/from Raleigh-Durham
$63 each way to/from Tulsa

Oakland
$63 each way to/from Boise
$36 each way to/from Burbank
$47 each way to/from Las Vegas
$36 each way to/from Los Angeles
$44 each way to/from Portland
$34 each way to/from Reno/Lake Tahoe
$46 each way to/from Seattle
$53 each way to/from Spokane
$63 each way to/from Tucson

Oklahoma City
$51 each way to/from Austin
$36 each way to/from Dallas Love Field
$55 each way to/from Houston Bush Intercontinental
$55 each way to/from Houston Hobby
$36 each way to/from Kansas City
$57 each way to/from Little Rock
$63 each way to/from Louisville
$57 each way to/from Lubbock
$57 each way to/from Midland/Odessa

Omaha
$64 each way to/from Cleveland
$61 each way to/from Columbus
$61 each way to/from Detroit
$61 each way to/from Louisville
$54 each way to/from Nashville

Ontario
$34 each way to/from Phoenix
$49 each way to/from Salt Lake City
$40 each way to/from Tucson

Orlando
$61 each way to/from Baltimore/Washington
$34 each way to/from Ft. Lauderdale
$49 each way to/from Jackson
$57 each way to/from Nashville
$44 each way to/from New Orleans

Phoenix
$34 each way to/from Ontario
$61 each way to/from Sacramento
$34 each way to/from San Diego
$59 each way to/from San Francisco
$55 each way to/from San Jose

Portland
$61 each way to/from Las Vegas
$44 each way to/from Oakland
$42 each way to/from Reno/Lake Tahoe
$44 each way to/from Sacramento
$44 each way to/from San Jose

Providence
$34 each way to/from Baltimore/Washington

Raleigh-Durham
$50 each way to/from Chicago Midway
$45 each way to/from Cleveland
$50 each way to/from Ft. Lauderdale
$48 each way to/from Hartford
$62 each way to/from Jackson
$45 each way to/from Louisville
$62 each way to/from New Orleans
$41 each way to/from Tampa Bay

Reno/Lake Tahoe
$36 each way to/from Boise
$44 each way to/from Burbank
$36 each way to/from Las Vegas
$44 each way to/from Los Angeles
$34 each way to/from Oakland
$42 each way to/from Portland
$34 each way to/from San Jose
$46 each way to/from Seattle
$51 each way to/from Spokane
$57 each way to/from Tucson

Sacramento
$36 each way to/from Burbank
$47 each way to/from Las Vegas
$36 each way to/from Los Angeles
$61 each way to/from Phoenix
$44 each way to/from Portland
$48 each way to/from Salt Lake City
$40 each way to/from San Diego

Salt Lake City
$36 each way to/from Boise
$49 each way to/from Ontario
$48 each way to/from Sacramento
$55 each way to/from Seattle
$48 each way to/from Spokane

San Antonio
$62 each way to/from Amarillo
$40 each way to/from Corpus Christi
$58 each way to/from El Paso
$61 each way to/from Little Rock
$61 each way to/from Tulsa

San Diego
$34 each way to/from Phoenix
$40 each way to/from Sacramento
$40 each way to/from San Francisco
$40 each way to/from San Jose

San Francisco
$97 each way to/from Albuquerque
$59 each way to/from Phoenix
$40 each way to/from San Diego

San Jose
$36 each way to/from Burbank
$42 each way to/from Las Vegas
$36 each way to/from Los Angeles
$55 each way to/from Phoenix
$44 each way to/from Portland
$34 each way to/from Reno/Lake Tahoe
$40 each way to/from San Diego

Seattle
$46 each way to/from Oakland
$46 each way to/from Reno/Lake Tahoe
$55 each way to/from Salt Lake City

Spokane
$34 each way to/from Boise
$53 each way to/from Oakland
$51 each way to/from Reno/Lake Tahoe
$48 each way to/from Salt Lake City

St. Louis
$36 each way to/from Chicago Midway
$44 each way to/from Cleveland
$42 each way to/from Detroit
$36 each way to/from Indianapolis
$34 each way to/from Kansas City
$36 each way to/from Little Rock

Tampa Bay
$61 each way to/from Baltimore/Washington
$44 each way to/from Birmingham
$61 each way to/from Columbus
$34 each way to/from Jacksonville
$61 each way to/from Louisville
$57 each way to/from Nashville
$41 each way to/from Raleigh-Durham

Tucson
$39 each way to/from Albuquerque
$63 each way to/from Oakland
$40 each way to/from Ontario
$57 each way to/from Reno/Lake Tahoe

Tulsa
$36 each way to/from Dallas Love Field
$56 each way to/from Houston Bush Intercontinental
$56 each way to/from Houston Hobby
$36 each way to/from Kansas City
$57 each way to/from Midland/Odessa
$63 each way to/from New Orleans
$61 each way to/from San Antonio

Southwest Airlines Click 'n Save Internet Specials
Other Terms and Conditions:

Tickets must be purchased through the Southwest Airlines
web site at http://www.southwest.com/ The fares listed
above are per person for each way of travel. Click 'n Save
Internet Specials require roundtrip travel and an overnight
stay. Fares listed are for general information only and
are not a reflection of current seat availability. Travel
may originate in either direction. Roundtrip travel must
be between the same origin airport and the same destination
airport.

Click 'n Save Internet Specials are nonchangeable and
nonrefundable. Ticketless Travel Online may only be
purchased with a credit card. Customers holding funds from
a previously unused trip on Southwest Airlines or Customers
who have Southwest Airlines vouchers will not be able to use
those forms of payment for Ticketless Travel Online.

Click 'n Save Internet Specials may not be combined with
any other fares. Seats are limited and won't be available
on some flights that operate during very busy travel times
and holiday periods. Any change to the reservation (flights,
dates, cities, and/or names of passengers) once purchased
will result in a fare increase. Standby travel requires an
upgrade to the full unrestricted fare.

Of course, if your favorite city is not listed, we have many
other incredible fares to all Southwest cities. To find more
great fares on Southwest Airlines, please visit Ticketless
Travel Online or check our Fares Information online at
http://www.southwest.com/.

************************************************************
Need a vacation???  Visit Southwest Airlines Vacations at:
http://www.swavacations.com/index1.htm  and book your
vacation online!  Don't forget to check out the Thrilling
Thursdays Weekly Specials for the hot deals of the week!
************************************************************

This is a post only mailing from Southwest Airlines.
Please do not attempt to respond to this message.

Copyright 2000 Southwest Airlines Co. All Rights Reserved.

---
You are currently subscribed to special-offers1 as: [sshackl@ect.enron.com]
To unsubscribe, send email to
leave-special-offers1-97904730L@mail.southwest.com
or unsubscribe anytime at http://www.southwest.com/email


This is the Grynberg lookalike we talked about.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Davis, Britt
Sent:	Friday, October 19, 2001 11:14 AM
To:	Sanders, Richard B.; Edison, Andrew
Cc:	Zikes, Becky
Subject:	RSM Production v. El Paso

	A couple of suggestions on which I would appreciate your response:

	1.  I believe we need to have internal due diligence/factual investigation done on whether any of the Enron entities served--Enron Corp.(of which Northern was a division for a period of time), Enron Gas Marketing, Inc. (EGM) or Intratex ever gathered gas, was the first measurer of gas, or provided measurement of gas on which ad valorem taxes were calculated, for Zapata County or communitized wells in adjacent counties that included leases located in whole or in part in Zapata County.  The petition specifically mentions that it includes acts going back to 1974 and earlier, so I would like to see how far back we can fairly easily put together a chronology.  What I hope to have is a time line of who did what and during what period of time, and locate the most important documents to show this.

	I am assuming that EGM was at all times only a marketer, although we need to do the due diligence to make sure.  Enron Corp. will be pretty easy, although Northern was for a brief period of time in the early 90s a division of Enron Corp., and Northern had non-contiguous gathering in South Texas that stopped right at the Zapata County line.  If that gathering system took gas from, say, a well in an adjacent county that was communitized with a lease in Zapata County, Enron Corp. may stay in the picture.  Last, with respect to Intratex, I am told by Lou that we no longer have the Intratex documents; did they go with HPL as a result of the sale?

	Becky and I are stretched thin on various matters right now and would like to suggest that we retain Marianne Salinas on this project immediately.

	2. I think it would be helpful to snag a first-rate gas measurement consultant now, before they all get taken.  I know Ken Cessac, who works here, very well, and think a great deal of him.  I know Andy has used him extensively already in Grynberg-related matters.  You may want to save money and not retain our own consultant, and instead rely on Ken; however, I know that Ken is being kept very busy.  On the other hand, I also think it is likely that we will wind up sharing at least the testifying gas measurement experts and their costs.  So, this is a judgment call.  However, I would be inclined to go ahead and retain Paul LaNasa, who sits on several AGA committees, as an Enron-only consulting expert, even though I don't think he is up to speed on the Grynberg allegations.  Both Grant Harvy and I were very impressed by him during the Northern v. ONEOK arbitration, during which we worked with him extensively and presented him as an expert witness (although I don't proposed to use him as a testifying expert here).  My point would be that if there was anything wrong with Enron's measurement that was either worse than or better than our co-defendants' measurement,  or put us in a different position, I am very confident he could point it out to us.

	I appreciate your thoughts.

	Britt


Thanks for your note - I'll keep those items in mind.  It seems pretty clear
to me that the Pres. has something of a bricks and mortar agenda and some
gentle nudges towards a more academic path may be needed.   I asked Mark
Kopinski, who is also coming to the planning meeting, if he wanted to join us
for dinner so I've sent him a note asking if he wants to go to the play or
not - I'll let you know what he says - I have mixed feelings since I'd like
to see the play but would regret the time we could have spent chatting.


The memo distributed on June 27 on Reimbursement of Individually Billed Items
requires
clarification.  The intent of the memo was to give employees an alternate
method
of paying for pagers, cell phones, etc.  Employees can continue to submit
these
invoices to Accounts Payable for processing or  pay these items with their
corporate
American Express card and request reimbursement through an expense report.
Either
way is an acceptable way to process these small dollar high volume invoices.


I've got it now, thanks Robert!

	RHarris@Credit2B.com
	12/19/2000 01:32 PM

		 To: Tana.Jones@enron.com, David.P.Dupre@enron.com, RHarris@Credit2B.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: uipdate

sent to Leslie's attention......

-----Original Message-----
From: Tana.Jones@enron.com [mailto:Tana.Jones@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2000 2:36 PM
To: David.P.Dupre@enron.com; rharris@Credit2B.com
Subject: Re: uipdate

There is some misunderstanding.  I still have not received the fax of the
NDA.  Did you have it to my attention, Tana Jones, at fax no. 713/636-3490?

                    David P Dupre

                                         To:     Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT

                    12/19/2000           cc:

                    01:19 PM             Subject:     uipdate

Hi,
When you have an opportunity, please forward this to me by courier or I
will be more than happy
to come by and pick this up.

Thanks again
David
EB3068B
---------------------- Forwarded by David P Dupre/HOU/ECT on 12/19/2000
01:21 PM ---------------------------

  (Embedded        Enron Capital & Trade Resources
  image moved      Corp.
  to file:
  pic16541.pcx     From:  RHarris@Credit2B.com
  )                12/19/2000 09:22 AM

To:   David.P.Dupre@enron.com
cc:
Subject:  RE:

Yes,

I faxed it again this AM and already received an e-mail back from Tana
confirming receipt.

Happy Holidays.

Robert

-----Original Message-----
From: David.P.Dupre@enron.com [mailto:David.P.Dupre@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2000 10:21 AM
To: RHarris@Credit2B.com
Subject:

Hi,

Yes, thanks for responding via email.

When you forward to Leslie, let me know so that I may inquire about
receiving a copy from her.

Regards

 (Embedded     Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.
 image moved
 to file:      From:  RHarris@Credit2B.com
 pic08723.pcx) 12/19/2000 09:18 AM

To:   David.P.Dupre@enron.com
cc:
Subject:  FW: NDA

Is this why you were calling this AM?

-----Original Message-----
From: Tana.Jones@enron.com [mailto:Tana.Jones@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2000 10:22 AM
To: RHarris@Credit2B.com
Subject: RE: NDA

Thanks!

                    RHarris@Credi

                    t2B.com              To:     Tana.Jones@enron.com,
RHarris@Credit2B.com
                                         cc:     Leslie.Hansen@enron.com,
David.P.Dupre@enron.com
                    12/19/2000           Subject:     RE: NDA

                    07:32 AM

Coming down first thing.

-----Original Message-----
From: Tana.Jones@enron.com [mailto:Tana.Jones@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, December 18, 2000 6:37 PM
To: RHarris@Credit2B.com
Cc: Leslie.Hansen@enron.com; David.P.Dupre@enron.com
Subject: RE: NDA

We do not appear to have received your fax of the NDA.  Can you please fax
it to my attention at 713/646-3490 and I will distribute it to the members
of the Enron Team.  Thanks!

                    RHarris@Credi

                    t2B.com              To:     Leslie.Hansen@enron.com

                                         cc:     Craig.Chaney@enron.com,
Tana.Jones@enron.com,
                    12/13/2000           Jeff.Kinneman@enron.com,
david.p.dupre@enron.com, mike.mumford@enron.com,
                    02:01 PM             mathew.dawson@enron.com

                                         Subject:     RE: NDA

We are fully executed.

I will fax a copy to your attention and you can distribute to your people
as
needed.

thanks for all your help.

Robert


"Other Provisions: On each Payment Date, [ENA] shall pay [a fee of] [an
amount equal to] USD{38,000?], which amount shall be subject to the netting
                                                 provisions of the [Master
Agreement - how do you refer to the agreement?]"

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 03/02/2001 02:20 PM -----

	Sara Shackleton
	03/02/2001 02:10 PM

		 To: Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: ISDA language:  see if you like the way this looks

"Calculation of Floating Amount: The Floating Amount payable by [ENA] on a
Payment Date will be calculated for that Payment Date as follows:

    Floating Amount = (Notional Quantity per Calculation Period X Floating
Price) - USD[38,000?]

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


Now for the good news, He wants to set in with the ya'll when you meet with
Mary.   I'd just have the meeting then tell him about it.  He also wants them
off the place in 14 days.   I told him no, to chill and that we will buy him
out.   That should hold him off a few days.   So don't move yet on getting my
money together?

Took Barb out to eat last night at Johnny Correno's.   No motorcycle riding
for
me.

Oh yeah, Don is going to see the Dr. about something to help with his nerves
and
to stop smoking.  He is going to tell him he is drinking with the stuff that
he
is taking.   Maybe the Doc can give him something to help settle down all this
hostility.

I'll work on the inventory list tonight.   You need to pull together all the
finical data, CD's etc. that are out and that we  cashed in.   Then we will
stick in new values.  Also need to give a good fair market value on items we
are
selling so we do not have to pay tax on the stuff right.  If we value the
place
at $175,000 and sell for less, then we don't have to pay taxes on the money,
so
I was told.

See Ya.

Chris.Germany@enron.com on 10/24/2000 08:09:57 AM
To:   Jerry W Germany
cc:
Subject:  Yo

Update.  Spoke with the lawyer yesterday.  We can't buy Don out right now.
We need to turn in the final inventory list, get things resolved with Mary
(be it good or bad) then we can buy Don out.

She still thinks that we won't have any issues with Mary.  After we provide
the inventory list, she wants me to meet with her (Joal), Mary, and Mary's
lawyer to see what we need to do to get this CONFLICT resolved.  Joal
thinks we should be able to do this during the first 2 weeks of November.

I have a bad cold and I went scooter riding last night.  Do you care?

I can't blame brother too much, I still bounce back and forth between major
frustration and apathy on the East Texas issue.  Hope for the best!!

Later


As discussed in our exchange of voicemails, attached is a draft notice letter
to FP&L.  Please confirm this is consistent with the desk's intention for the
final 2 months of the term.  Notice must be sent by 15 December.   --David


[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]

	[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
ADVANCED SEARCH

[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]

	Wednesday  April 25th 2001

	Subscribe now! | E-mail & Mobile Editions |  Screensaver

	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]

OPINION

WORLD

BUSINESS

FINANCE

SCIENCE

PEOPLE

BOOKS & ARTS

MARKETS

DIVERSIONS

[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
Our new travel section
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE] [IMAGE]
[IMAGE]  SURVEY:  SOFTWARE

 Find  thought-provoking articles about the future of software in the newly
published  Economist survey. This essential reading provides a history of
open source  software, details the growing trend towards software leased via
the Internet,  and explains the battle of operating system platforms. Click
here to read about the future of software.

    [IMAGE]

PRINT EDITION
THE ECONOMIST
 [IMAGE]Full contents
[IMAGE]Subscriptions

[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE][IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	On the Global Agenda
				 April  25th 2001

				Japan's  maverick wins
				Junichiro  Koizumi, a politician regarded by party elders as a dangerous
maverick,  has been elected leader of Japan's ruling Liberal Democratic
Party  and is set to become prime minister. He could be a breath of fresh
air for Japan*if his reformist zeal can survive the next few weeks
				Full  article

				Freeing  trade in the Americas
				Protesters  captured much of the media attention at the Summit of the
Americas  in Quebec on April 20th-22nd. The leaders themselves were
undeterred.  They took an important step towards their goal: creating the
largest  free-trade area in the world.
				Full  article

				Cavallo's  crisis
				Political  confusion, mounting economic woes and waning confidence threaten
to  push Argentina into a debt default. Unless Domingo Cavallo, the economy
minister, can pull the country back from the brink, the consequences  for all
Latin America will be dire
				Full  article

				Upsetting  China
				George  Bush's long-expected decision about which arms to sell to Taiwan
does  not go as far as many in the Republican Party had demanded, but it  is
enough to alter the balance of power in Asia, and enough to upset  the
Chinese
				Full article

				Dialling  up trouble
				Mobile-telephone  operators are in big trouble. Some equipment suppliers are
stumbling  too. Mergers and takeovers beckon throughout the industry
				Full article

				Getting  America moving again
				The surprise  cut in American interest rates on April 18th underlined the
Federal  Reserve's determination to avoid recession in the world's largest
economy. But will the Fed's newly aggressive strategy work? And what  are the
long-term implications for monetary and fiscal policy?
				Full article

				NEW  ON ECONOMIST.COM: GLOBAL EXECUTIVE

				Global  Executive is a new career and management section on Economist.com
that provides guidance for executives with an international  outlook. With
job postings, personalised career advice, observations  on employment trends
and reviews of the latest management books,  it's indispensable to the
internationally-minded business executive.  Visit Global  Executive today.

				SEARCH
				The EconomistGlobal LibraryThe webThe EIU Advanced search

				[IMAGE]
				Customer service

				To stop receiving this newsletter, please send an e-mail with "unsubscribe"
in the subject line to global_agenda-off@ lists.economist.com

				If you are a registered user at The Economist website, you can sign up for or
cancel the text and html versions of this newsletter or change your e-mail
address by amending your details.

				If you would like to advise us of a new e-mail address and are not registered
at The Economist website, please send an e-mail with your request to:
economist-newsletters@lists.economist.com

				?
					[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]
					[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]
				[IMAGE]  	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]
						[IMAGE]

						GO TO ECONOMIST.COM
						 , Copyright 2001 The Economist Newspaper and The Economist Group. All rights
reserved.
						Legal disclaimer | Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions
						[IMAGE]
						[IMAGE]


Hi Carolyn,

Is this the most current version?

Thanks,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 02/22/2001 04:08
PM ---------------------------

"Campbell, Carolyn" <CCampbell@KSLAW.com> on 01/11/2001 06:29:24 PM
To: "'kay.mann@enron.com'" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc: "'ben.f.jacoby@enron.com'" <ben.f.jacoby@enron.com>,
"'fred.mitro@enron.com'" <fred.mitro@enron.com>

Subject: Revised 7EA Turbine Letter Agreement

 <<2RZ504!.DOC>>  <<2RZ5RED.DOC>>

Kay:

We have enclosed clean and marked copies of a revised draft of the 7EA
turbine letter agreement reflecting revisions from the draft previously
distributed on January 8, 2001.  Please review and advise of any comments.
Thank you.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King & Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com

Enclosures: 129569v4
  129569vR4/3

 - 2RZ504!.DOC
 - 2RZ5RED.DOC


Hi Eric,

It looks like Enron employees have an enterprising spirit according to the H. Chronicle.  Ebay is saturated with Enron goodies.  This is quite amusing.

Sorry about tonight and we will miss you on your birthday.  We will celebrate whenever you wish, just let us know.  If you change your mind about tomorrow, email me.  Donnita and Jason are coming over for dinner.  We would love for you to come.

Have a wonderful day.  LU-M


0010 Lone Liquidations:
Phillips N45554.3 is a take to the desk, deal was killed in sitara
PGL&C should be transferred to the Peoples desk - tagg has the book as
FT-Peoples.
Take remaining variance.
PL


Attached is the latest version. As each day passes, we receive more data
which helps to shape the document attached. The most recent additions have
been italicized in red and blue for ease of reference. Should you have any
comments pls. forward to Janie or I. Thanks


we will need one more too.  just let me know.

RH

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rogers, Benjamin
Sent:	Thursday, July 26, 2001 10:25 AM
To:	Herndon, Rogers
Subject:	RE: Tennis?

I already called Andrew, just waiting for a reply.  Sounds good though.  I'll let you know soon about Andrew.
Ben

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Herndon, Rogers
Sent:	Thursday, July  26, 2001 10:23 AM
To:	Rogers, Benjamin
Subject:	RE: Tennis?

yes - let's definitely play.  outside chance i might go to New Orleans for the day Saturday but i doubt it.  how about those other guys you mentioned?  Maybe we could play a round robin and a set of doubles on Sat am.  Or we could do it Sunday.

RH

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rogers, Benjamin
Sent:	Thursday, July 26, 2001 9:58 AM
To:	Herndon, Rogers
Subject:	Tennis?

Rogers:
Wanted to see if you were around for a little tennis this weekend.  Talk to you soon.
Ben


like 35 or something


Hello.

Good news!  Ben passed all of his classes...by the skin of his teeth, so he
is able to come to Houston.  :)

Ben and I both tried to find the web site about the wave runner license but
were unsuccessful.  Were you able to ask your friends?  Ben is now very
anxious to take the test so he can drive one of the wave runners.

Love,
Linda


Boy, you are on fire today!  Glad you think so highly of me????  I give the goldfish two weeks...

deep fried.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Denne, Karen
Sent:	Thursday, October 11, 2001 4:48 PM
To:	Dasovich, Jeff
Subject:	RE: Conversation w/Jerry Hirsch of LA Times

I should have known.  You're so politically correct.  Did I tell you we now have an office goldfish?  Steve has offered to kick in $5 toward fish food if it lives a week.

Talked to Joan Kradin yesterday.  We're still negotiating a small retainer for November/December.  She said to say "hi" to you, and Ken Smith sang your praises, too.

You have everyone snowed, my dear!  Or do you have them poo-pooed?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Thursday, October 11, 2001 4:38 PM
To:	Denne, Karen
Subject:	RE: Conversation w/Jerry Hirsch of LA Times

Ms Denne, at Enron, we use the more polite form, "deep doo-doo."

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Denne, Karen
Sent:	Thursday, October 11, 2001 4:37 PM
To:	Dasovich, Jeff
Subject:	RE: Conversation w/Jerry Hirsch of LA Times

I can't top that.  Except.... deep shit? sorry, didn't mean to degenerate into profanity.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Thursday, October 11, 2001 4:36 PM
To:	Denne, Karen
Subject:	RE: Conversation w/Jerry Hirsch of LA Times

deep six?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Denne, Karen
Sent:	Thursday, October 11, 2001 4:35 PM
To:	Dasovich, Jeff
Subject:	RE: Conversation w/Jerry Hirsch of LA Times

deep sleep?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Thursday, October 11, 2001 4:00 PM
To:	Denne, Karen
Subject:	RE: Conversation w/Jerry Hirsch of LA Times

given the mess out here, and how long it's been going on, howzabout "deep therapy?"

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Denne, Karen
Sent:	Thursday, October 11, 2001 1:57 PM
To:	Dasovich, Jeff
Subject:	RE: Conversation w/Jerry Hirsch of LA Times

how about deep pocket??  you're too cute! :-) kd

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Thursday, October 11, 2001 12:43 PM
To:	Denne, Karen
Subject:	RE: Conversation w/Jerry Hirsch of LA Times

deepthroat is rather provocative, don't you think?

Hey, whatever you're doing, keep it up!  I don't know how you moved the stock from 24 to 37, and I don't care.  Keep it up!

Best,
Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Denne, Karen
Sent:	Thursday, October 11, 2001 12:42 PM
To:	Dasovich, Jeff
Subject:	RE: Conversation w/Jerry Hirsch of LA Times

so YOU'RE the unnamed source.  Should we call you Deepthroat?  :-) kd

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Thursday, October 11, 2001 12:37 PM
To:	Kean, Steven J.; Shapiro, Richard; Denne, Karen; Palmer, Mark A. (PR); Kaufman, Paul; Mara, Susan; Steffes, James D.
Subject:	Conversation w/Jerry Hirsch of LA Times

FYI.  Hirsch apparently is a business reporter for the Times who got my name from people.  He's doing a story about the contracts.  Something like "they bought way too much for too high a price.  Now what?"  I told him that I would talk to him under the following conditions:

No attribution to Enron specifically
No attribution of the "unnamed sources" sort, "industry sources" or sort, etc.
If, when the story's further along, he wants to try to get a quote from us, I'd put him in touch with our PR folks.

We talked generally about DWR, the CA Power Authority, the contracts, the Edison deal with the PUC, etc.

More specifically, he asked me "are there any alternatives to deal with this mess."  I outlined the following proposal, which we've talked about internally, and which we've been quietly shopping behind the scenes.  I did not bring up the "green only" DA for small customers piece of the proposal (slipped my mind).

I also gave him names of other folks I thought he should talk to.  He said he might get back to me.  If he calls back, I'll let you know.

Please let me know if anyone has any concerns 1) about talking to him on a backgound only basis, and/or 2) the proposal outlined below. Thanks.

Best,
Jeff

**********************************************************************************************************
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Tuesday, October 09, 2001 10:53 AM
To:	Shapiro, Richard; Steffes, James D.; Mara, Susan
Subject:

Rick:
Based on your voicemail, here's a quick-and-dirty synopsis of a proposal that I've been quietly discussing with a select few out here in California (e.g., John White, large customers).  It could include more bells and whistles, but the intent of this proposal is to get DA back as soon as possible.
**************************************************************************

Reduce DWR L-T contract volumes by at least 33-50%
To "back fill" increase in net-short created by contract reformation, permit noncore customers (20 KW and above) to elect to go DA to fill the position
DA provides a significantly more efficient hedge against price volatility than DWR contracts
Election is first-come, first-serve, capped at the aggregate net short position
Customers decision to go DA will constitute a 3-year commitment to stay DA (i.e., can't go back to IOU for 3 yrs; must stay in the market)
If a net short position remains after noncore customers have elected DA (i.e., not enough elect to fill the net short), then the IOUs will hold an auction to fill the net short
The auction would seek a portfolio of 3 month, 6 month, 1 year and 3 year deals (both peak and off-peak) to fill the net short.
Noncore customers choosing DA would not escape costs of DWR power consumed when the customer was receiving utility service (i.e., prior to electing DA)
Likewise, if the noncore customers choosing DA was a utility customer during the period when the utility accured its "undercollection," (i.e., when wholesale prices exceeded the retail cap), the customer would not escape those costs by virtue of electing DA status
Noncore customers would not bear responsibility for recovery of DWR L-T contracts.
Potential add-on to deal:  Core customers (less than 20 KW) could choose "green only" DA, but, like, noncore customers could not escape costs for which they are responsible.


I've rescheduled room 5G in Houston for Nov. 2.

Amy - will you reschedule the room in NY? Let me know and I will change the
video calendar.

Steve Ellis
Regional Technology Manager
Goldman Sachs Houston
713.654.8489

-----Original Message-----
From: Stacy Carey [mailto:SCAREY@ISDA.ORG]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 10:10 AM
To: Bunkin, Steven
Cc: Ruth Ainslie; Stacy Carey; Scott Marra; Janette Elberton; Mark
Haedicke; Mark Taylor; 'Sager, Elizabeth'
Subject: Rescheduled ISDA Energy and Developing Products Committee
Meeting on October 23

Hello All -- unfortunately we have had to reschedule the October 23, 2001
meeting to Friday, November 2, 2001.

Bob and Amy -- could we graciously impose upon Goldman again to see if the
video conferencing facilities might be available on Nov. 2 from 11:00 a.m. -
12:30 p.m. (EST)/10:00 - 11:30 a.m.(Central)

Many thanks! -- Stacy

Stacy Carey
Policy Director
International Swaps and Derivatives Association
600 5th Avenue, 27th Floor
Rockefeller Center
New York, NY  10020
(212) 332-1202 ph
(212) 332-1212 fax
(917) 543-9622 cell
scarey@isda.org

-----Original Message-----
From: Siedenburg, Amy [mailto:amy.siedenburg@gs.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 11:59 AM
To: 'Stacy Carey'
Cc: Ellis, Steve (Houston)
Subject: RE: ISDA Energy and Developing Products Committee Meeting -
October

the only room available in ny w/ video capability is 32 old slip room 23B1 -
it holds 12 people. thats all i could do
in houston the room is 5c

the call in #s are
Domestic:  1-877-718-6588 -passcode 20952
International:  212-902-0992- Passcode 2-0952

let me know if you need anything else

-----Original Message-----
From: Stacy Carey [mailto:SCAREY@ISDA.ORG]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 11:58 AM
To: Amy Siedenburg
Subject: RE: ISDA Energy and Developing Products Committee Meeting -
October

Amy -- We should plan on about 15-20 people in each location based on the
July 27 meeting.  We will need a call-in number for domestic and
international, if possible.  -- Many thanks! -- Stacy

-----Original Message-----
From: Siedenburg, Amy [mailto:amy.siedenburg@gs.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 11:59 AM
To: 'Stacy Carey'
Subject: RE: ISDA Energy and Developing Products Committee Meeting -
October

how many people will be attending in ny and in houston
also, will you need a call in #

-----Original Message-----
From: Stacy Carey [mailto:SCAREY@ISDA.ORG]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 9:22 AM
To: Bob Mancini; Amy Siedenburg
Cc: Bunkin, Steven; Stacy Carey
Subject: RE: ISDA Energy and Developing Products Committee Meeting -
October

thank you -- stacy

-----Original Message-----
From: Mancini, Robert [mailto:robert.mancini@gs.com]
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 7:26 PM
To: 'amy.siedenburg@gs.com'
Cc: Bunkin, Steven; 'scarey@isda.org'
Subject: Fw: ISDA Energy and Developing Products Committee Meeting -
October

Please inquire asap
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)

-----Original Message-----
From: Stacy Carey <SCAREY@ISDA.ORG>
To: Bob Mancini <robert.mancini@gs.com>; 'STEVEN BUNKIN'
<steven.bunkin@gs.com>; Amy Siedenburg <amy.siedenburg@gs.com>
Sent: Mon Sep 24 15:01:20 2001
Subject: ISDA Energy and Developing Products Committee Meeting - October

Hello All -- hope everyone is well!  We are thinking of scheduling the next
Energy and Developing Products Committee meeting on October 23 from 10:00 -
Noon and was wondering if your video conferencing facilities might be
available for this meeting in NY and Houston? Many Thanks -- Stacy

Stacy Carey
Policy Director
International Swaps and Derivatives Association
600 5th Avenue, 27th Floor
Rockefeller Center
New York, NY  10020
(212) 332-1202 ph
(212) 332-1212 fax
(917) 543-9622 cell
scarey@isda.org


Mark,

Do u want to send anybody to this conference?

Vince
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 01/25/2000
12:46 PM ---------------------------

Larry Chorn <lgc@roce-inc.com> on 01/25/2000 12:30:17 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Real Options E&P course

Vince:

As you requested, we mailed you a brochure about our upcoming course
(2/22-4/4) in Houston.

We are now following up with that mailing to identify remaining
attendees for the session.  I wanted to make sure that we did not
overlook anyone at Enron, so I am dropping you this email to see if you
have anyone there in mind as an attendee.

Best regards,

Larry Chorn
972.814.5342
www.realoptions-software.com


Approve.

From: Gary P Smith/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/16/2001 04:21 PM
To: Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: FW: PAA's for Project Team

Stan,
Attached below are four PAAs for employees in Steve Hotte's organization who
worked on the P-Gas project.  Steve discussed these with both you and I.
Three of the four are for $3,000 each (the other is for $1,000).  Typically
your approval has been requested for PAAs greater than $2,000.  Please reply
by email if you approve this request.
Gary

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Laura Kinningham
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 3:34 PM
To: Gary P Smith
Cc: Brian Schaffer
Subject: FW: PAA's for Project Team

Gary, per our discussion this morning, these are the PAA request forms for
the completion of the P-Gas project in IT.

---------------------- Forwarded by Laura Kinningham/OTS/Enron on 05/10/2001
10:25 AM ---------------------------
From: Steve Hotte/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/09/2001 03:20 PM
To: Laura Kinningham/OTS/Enron@Enron
cc: Michael Sullivan/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: FW: PAA's for Project Team

Approved, per our discussion.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Sullivan, Michael
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 2:49 PM
To: Stern, Ellis; Kinningham, Laura; Hotte, Steve
Subject: PAA's for Project Team

Please approve and forward to Laura Kinningham.   Laura, would like to
deliver on or about May 31.

Ellis will approve Robin's and has agreed to fund her award from Rod's pool.
Ellis please forward your CC number with your approval.

Steve will approve Jeff, Molly and Sandy's.

Jeff
Molly

Sandy

Robin


Attached is the doc for the QF write-up, and the development spreadsheet
created by FPL (combined with our assets). I have taken out the implied
EBITDA section for now, whcih we can add it back in if we want to.


come by whenever

Sarah Wesner@ENRON
12/12/2000 01:31 PM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: EDF trades switched to ABN

John - I need to talk to you about this, are you free today?  Sarah


Michael,

We calculated 7% but at $750/acre (Terry seems to think there is no way
we can get if for less than that, and I voiced my opinion not to go
higher).  He said that they did mention owner financing late last week -
as low as 6% so maybe we could go higher on the per acre price.  We
didn't calculate hunting income or taxes - assuming roughly they would
cancel out.  Also, Terry indicates that the farm really wants half (not
sure if he needs to tie out with Daddy) - so that would leave us with
responsibility for 175 each.

I think the cropland base numbers are too high on your spread sheet.  If
you add the rice base, grain base and cropland base, you come up in
excess of the total acreage.  I can redo the sheet this afternoon.

The end result we had is that we would each be out of pocket
approximately $500/ month.  Mark and I are willing to do that.  Not sure
what you are thinking there.

Sarah

 Original Message-----
From: Michael Hlavinka [mailto:M.Hlavinka@bre.com]
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 9:00 AM
To: McConnell, Sarah
Subject: Land Cash Flow Analysis

Sarah:

I've done some cash flow calculations on that land using the numbers
given to us by Daddy (assuming $725/ac and 7.25% financing).  Do they
agree with what you and Mark have come up with?  Have I left something
out?

My calculations indicate that if you can purchase for $700/ac and
finance at 7%, you break even with $61/ac rental on the rice base.  I
don't know if that is possible.

You can change the numbers in the worksheet and the calculations should
update to reflect the correct values.

Let me know what you think.

Michael


Thursday, November 30, 2000

Dear Subscriber,

Travelocity.com fare watcher found 2 recent fare change(s) based on
your current round-trip selections. If the fares have
gone down in price, we recommend you act quickly to take
advantage of time-sensitive low fares.

To find one of the fares below, point your web browser
to your Personal Fare Watcher Page in Travelocity.com. To do
so, click on the following URL link, or copy and paste
the URL into your browser.

http://dps1.travelocity.com:80/fwemindiv.ctl?fw=018N0G2|TRAVELOCITY

========   FARES      ============================

*  LGA-IAH   FROM: NEW YORK LAGUARDIA (LGA)
             TO:   HOUSTON-BUSH INTERCO (IAH)
   PRICE:    NEW PRICE      WAS      DIFFERENCE
             ---------    -------    ----------
             $142.00      $198.00     -$56.00

*  IAH-LGA   FROM: HOUSTON-BUSH INTERCO (IAH)
             TO:   NEW YORK LAGUARDIA (LGA)
   PRICE:    NEW PRICE      WAS      DIFFERENCE
             ---------    -------    ----------
             $142.00      $198.00     -$56.00

Prices DO NOT INCLUDE applicable tax and fees (Tax
and fees on international fares may be higher).

All fares are quoted in U.S. dollars.

************NEW************
Go places you've never dreamed possible!  Introducing Dream Maps from
Travelocity.com.  Tell us where you are and what you want to spend and
we'll tell you where you can go.  Your budget may be limited but not
your possibilities! Check out Dream Maps on Travelocity.com.  Go
Virtually Anywhere.  http://dps1.travelocity.com:80/dreamMap.ctl
*****************************

========  DISCOUNT HOTELS  ==================

Travelocity.com offers Value Rates at great hotels in:

HOUSTON-BUSH INTERCO (IAH) starting at just $55
Click:
http://dps1.travelocity.com:80/hotsrqst.ctl?mode=2&airport=IAH&rate_cat=V

NEW YORK LAGUARDIA (LGA) starting at just $69
Click:
http://dps1.travelocity.com:80/hotsrqst.ctl?mode=2&airport=LGA&rate_cat=V

========   TRAVELOCITY.COM TIP     ===================

Find these and other low fares fast using Best Fare Finder.
Just follow the link above to your personal Fare Watcher
page, select your destination city and airline, and we will
display a calendar highlighting the dates that fare is
offered.  It is just that simple!

========   OF SPECIAL INTEREST   ======================

Explore exotic destinations and discover intriguing travel information
and special deals.  Don't miss one issue of Travelocity
Magazine--subscribe now!
http://www.travelocity.com/magazine/subscribe/

========   MAKING RESERVATIONS  ==================

* FOR ONLINE RESERVATIONS -

http://dps1.travelocity.com:80/lognlogin.ctl?Service=TRAVELOCITY

* TO CHANGE OR CANCEL YOUR SUBSCRIPTION TO FAREWATCHER EMAIL -

http://dps1.travelocity.com:80/fwemsub.ctl?Service=TRAVELOCITY

* TO RETRIEVE YOUR PASSWORD -

http://dps1.travelocity.com:80/lognpwdform.ctl?Service=TRAVELOCITY

IMPORTANT:
 1.  All published fares are for one adult, round-
trip, between your selected cities. Seats are subject
to availability and other restrictions may apply.
ALWAYS READ THE FARE RULES!

 2.  Fares shown to the US and Canada do not include
a $2 federal excise tax which will be imposed on each
flight segment of your itinerary.


Lucy,

The spreadsheet looks fine to me.

Phillip


oops. sunday.


----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 03/27/2001 02:41 PM -----

	Terry West
	02/09/2001 01:36 PM

		 To: Rebecca Carter/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Board presentations

Attached are the presentations for the Corporate Staff Group and the 2001
Goals.  There have been slight modifications to the format.


Jeff, can you spend a little time thinking about the current North American
energy markets (very high energy prices, stretched infrastructure, etc) and
determine which game changing or altering technologies, business models or
existing corporate positions that will benefit from such price and volatility
levels.

  In particular, I think that Miller should take a look at coal gasification
technologies, emissions technologies and DSM/efficiency technologies and how
these investments may fit in the charter or our overall business.  As well,
from a corporate development point of view which parts of the value chain ie)
IPP, E&P, utility, assets, etc are undervalued given current commodity curves
and expectations.

Can you get back to me with a few ideas in the next week or so - maybe it
would help to go pick a few brains in various ENA orgs as part of your
process.

Regards
Delainey


---------------------- Forwarded by Ami Chokshi/Corp/Enron on 01/18/2000
11:11 AM ---------------------------

troy_a_benoit@reliantenergy.com on 01/18/2000 10:48:53 AM
To: Ami Chokshi/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: 19TH NOMS ON COPANOS

(See attached file: HPL-Jan.xls)

 - HPL-Jan.xls


I hadn't heard about his changes.... did he swith co's...

I will confirm meeting time.

Thanks, BT

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Monday, September 17, 2001 7:49 PM
To:	Tycholiz, Barry
Subject:

Greetings:

1) I haven't forgot about Baldwin, but it seems that things have changed for him (and his company?).  His long-standing number know longer works and there's no forwarding number.  I'm trying to track him down.

2) What time's your weekly meeting on Thursday, and is there a call-in number?

Best,
Jeff


Clayton,

It translates into a credit risk for those on the other side of the hedge.
Many producers have a long history of poor timing of hedges.
I could give you quite a long list. They definitely need a bright
adviser who will tell them the price of gas two years from now.

Vince

	Clayton Vernon @ ENRON
	06/29/2000 01:02 AM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: from today's paper

Vince:

Here's an amazing factoid in today's paper related to the issue of how much
money you can "make" (sic) by hedging:

...

Other companies analysts say are saddled with hedges include El Paso Energy
Corp. and Coastal Corp., which are merging.

A Coastal official declined to comment on the company's forward positions.

Although El Paso is known for its pipeline business, it produces gas as
result of its $6.2 billion acquisition last year of Sonat. "More than 90
percent" of that gas is hedged through the rest of the year, said Bruce
Connery, vice president of investor relations. The forward contracts are for
$2.40, he said.

Hedging in the current market plays to the company's primary aim of meeting
investors' expectations, Connery said.

"Our first goal is to deliver the earnings goal that we set out, and that
dictates that we hedge out commodity volatility," he said.

...

$2.40??? Are you kidding????

Clayton


The message that you sent was undeliverable to the following:
tacstar@mcm.org (user not found)

Possibly truncated original message follows:

Received: from postmaster.enron.com (outbound5.enron.com [192.152.140.9]) by
mail.mcm.org; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 15:55:32 -0600
Received: from mailman.enron.com (mailman.enron.com [192.168.189.66]) by
postmaster.enron.com (8.8.8/8.8.8/postmaster-1.00) with ESMTP id VAA22824 for
<tacstar@mcm.org>; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 21:53:53 GMT
From: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com
Received: from nahou-msmsw02px.corp.enron.com ([172.28.10.38]) by
mailman.enron.com (8.10.1/8.10.1/corp-1.05) with ESMTP id f1NLrqa09405 for
<tacstar@mcm.org>; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 15:53:52 -0600 (CST)
Received: from ene-mta01.enron.com (unverified) by
nahou-msmsw02px.corp.enron.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.1.5) with ESMTP
id <Tac1c0a2651e86a4cd1@nahou-msmsw02px.corp.enron.com> for
<tacstar@mcm.org>; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 15:53:51 -0600
Subject: Referred to You By the Greens about Possibly Growing Grapes on My
Property
To: tacstar@mcm.org
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.3  March 21, 2000
Message-ID: <OFC95DD77D.8ED2728C-ON862569FC.0077610E@enron.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 15:53:45 -0600
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on ENE-MTA01/Enron(Release 5.0.6 |December
14, 2000) at 02/23/2001 03:51:24 PM
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Greetings Sally:
My name is Jeff Dasovich.  The Greens have been helping me develop 40 acres
of land that I bought just north of Anchor Bay (a couple of miles up the
hill from Highway One, about 1200 ft or so up) and they suggested that I
contact you.

The property is right in the heart of the Banana Belt and my property faces
south, is protected, and a such is very hot and sunny from late spring
through later summer/early fall.  The property has an abundance of water on
it.  Of course, the possibility of evening fog raises some tricky issues,
and I haven't done soil tests.  In short, while I think there are some
challenges, I'm convinced that there is at least the strong possibility
that I could grow grapes--around 10 acres or so.

I'm sure that you're extremely busy, but I'd be very interested in talking


Good Monday Morning to all!

Samantha Boyd will be out of the office this morning, and will return again
tomorrow morning.  Should anyone need to contact her, I am able to do so.
Feel free to contact me at  x5-3317,  should you need any assistance.  Thank
you for your attention to this matter.  Regards, Keegan Farrell


Will proceed and send you a draft.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


-----Original Message-----
From: vicki storey [mailto:vickistorey@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 10:29 AM
To: gstorey@enron.com
Subject: health insurance questions

1.  when do you elect benefits
2.  when do you switch from enron health insurance to
ubs health insurance.
3.  can we get a list of in network doctors (usually
they have one on line)
4.  is there a self directed 401k option.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail!
http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/


Status report:  Utility solvency
Status report:  EBS in California