================================================================
As requested, your News Alert for QCOM
follows from EquityAlert.com.
To edit/discontinue your alerts please refer to end of message.
PLEASE REVIEW THE NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER BELOW
================================================================

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-= Paid Advertisement -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Looking for an emerging growth company in an exciting, burgeoning
industry.

Search no more. Xraymedia.Com (OTC BB: XRMD) is currently assembling
partners to undertake the business of selling conventional
advertising space and online advertising in an industry that broke
the $2billion dollar mark in the second quarter of 2000. For more
compelling information on this exciting investment opportunity,

click here: http://205.210.134.51/a1.asp?ID=1249aa

AOL USERS: copy & paste the link above into your browser.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

QUALCOMM and Tektronix Expand CDMA License Agreement; 3G Amendment
Enables Tektronix to Further Develop and Manufacture Test Solutions for the
Wireless Industry

SAN DIEGO, Dec 11, 2000 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- QUALCOMM Incorporated (Nasdaq:
QCOM)
and Tektronix, Inc. (NYSE: TEK) today announced that they have entered into an
amended license agreement expanding Tektronix' existing Code Division Multiple
Access (CDMA) license agreement with QUALCOMM. Tektronix will use the license
to
develop and manufacture third-generation (3G) test solutions for the wireless
industry. These next-generation products will operate on higher-capacity
wireless networks, deployed to meet the growing demands for high-speed
wireless
data applications and Internet access.

"This 3G license agreement amendment for QUALCOMM's essential patent portfolio
at industry-standard royalty rates will allow Tektronix to expand its ability
to
develop and manufacture advanced next-generation test solutions for the 3G
CDMA
market, including cdma2000, WCDMA and 1xEV," said Marvin Blecker, senior vice
president of technology transfer for QUALCOMM. "We are pleased that Tektronix
has chosen to expand its license to help meet the growing demand for CDMA
wireless solutions."

"The wireless industry needs measurement tools that are capable of meeting the
immediate development needs of 3G applications," said Scott Bausback, vice
president, Communications Business Unit, Tektronix. "Access to QUALCOMM's
world-class technology enables Tektronix to create state-of-the-art 3G test
solutions -- and in turn, enable designers and manufacturers to successfully
develop and install the infrastructure needed to meet the growing demands of
today's wireless customers."

Tektronix, Inc. is a test, measurement and monitoring company providing
measurement solutions to the telecommunications, computer and semiconductor
industries worldwide. With over 50 years of experience, Tektronix enables its
customers to design, build, deploy and manage next-generation global
communications networks and Internet technologies. Headquartered in Beaverton,
Ore., Tektronix has operations in 26 countries worldwide. Tektronix' Web
address
is www.tektronix.com.

QUALCOMM Incorporated (www.qualcomm.com) is a leader in developing and
delivering innovative digital wireless communications products and services
based on the Company's CDMA digital technology. The Company's business areas
include integrated CDMA chipsets and system software; technology licensing;
Eudora(R) email software for Windows(R) and Macintosh(R) computing platforms;
digital cinema systems; and satellite-based systems including portions of the
Globalstar(TM) system and wireless fleet management systems, OmniTRACS(R) and
OmniExpress(TM). QUALCOMM owns patents that are essential to all of the CDMA
wireless telecommunications standards that have been adopted or proposed for
adoption by standards-setting bodies worldwide. QUALCOMM has licensed its
essential CDMA patent portfolio to more than 90 telecommunications equipment
manufacturers worldwide. Headquartered in San Diego, Calif., QUALCOMM is
included in the S&P 500 Index and is a 2000 FORTUNE 500(R) company traded on
The
Nasdaq Stock Market(R) under the ticker symbol QCOM.

Except for the historical information contained herein, this news release
contains forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and
uncertainties,
including the Company's ability to successfully design and have manufactured
significant quantities of CDMA components on a timely and profitable basis,
the
extent and speed to which CDMA is deployed, change in economic conditions of
the
various markets the Company serves, as well as the other risks detailed from
time to time in the Company's SEC reports, including the report on Form 10-K
for
the year ended September 24, 2000, and most recent Form 10-Q.

QUALCOMM, OmniTRACS and Eudora are registered trademarks and OmniExpress is a
trademark of QUALCOMM Incorporated. Globalstar is a trademark of Loral
QUALCOMM
Satellite Services, Incorporated. Windows is a registered trademark of
Microsoft
Corp. Macintosh is a registered trademark of Apple Computer Inc. All other
trademarks are the property of their respective owners.

CONTACT:          QUALCOMM Incorporated
Christine Trimble, Corporate Public Relations
858/651-3628, Fax 858/651-2590
ctrimble@qualcomm.com
or
Julie Cunningham, Investor Relations
858/658-4224, Fax 858/651-9303
jcunningham@qualcomm.com
or
Tektronix
Steve Kuyatt, Worldwide Public Relations
503/627-2001, Fax 503/627-4873
steven.j.kuyatt@tektronix.com
or
Heather Wyse, Investor Relations
503/627-1121, Fax 503/627-1161
heather.l.wyse@tektronix.com

URL:              http://www.businesswire.com
Today's News On The Net - Business Wire's full file on the Internet
with Hyperlinks to your home page.

Copyright (C) 2000 Business Wire.  All rights reserved.

-0-

KEYWORD:          CALIFORNIA
INDUSTRY KEYWORD: COMPUTERS/ELECTRONICS
HARDWARE
INTERNET
SOFTWARE
TELECOMMUNICATIONS
MARKETING
AGREEMENTS

****************** TO EDIT YOUR EQUITY ALERTS ********************
To unsubscribe or edit your alerts, visit
http://www.equityalert.com/alerts.asp?uid=alewis34&xid=40352
******************************************************************

***IMPORTANT NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER REGARDING THIS COURTESY EMAIL**
At your request, as a subscriber to our service, this email alert
is being sent to you as a courtesy and is for information purposes
only.  We are a financial news re-distributor.  We are not an
investment advisory and do not purport to tell or suggest which
companies you should monitor or which securities you should
purchase or sell.
In addition to the information regarding the company you are
monitoring (the &Monitored Company8), this email contains an
advertisement describing a product, service or company for which we
received a fee, at our normal advertising rates of $55 per 1,000 e-
mails (subject to volume and other discounts), from the advertising
company.  In addition, not withstanding our policy of prohibiting
employees from buying or selling securities of an advertising
company for a period of 20 days following dissemination of the
advertisement, we may not be able to effectively monitor our
employees to ensure compliance with the same. Consequently, there
may be sales and/or purchases of such securities by our employees
prior to, during and immediately following the dissemination of the
advertisement.
Please note that (1) this email may not contain the full text of
the press release issued by, or the research or other reports
regarding, the Monitored Company; and (2) the text of the
advertisement, the press release and/or reports were obtained from
third party sources and were not written, generated or edited by
us; accordingly, we make no representations or give any assurance
as to the accuracy or completeness, nor have we conducted any
independent investigations of, the disclosures regarding the
subject matter of such releases and reports.
Please note that links to the advertising company and/or Monitored
Company are provided for your convenience.  We assume no obligation
for the content of such sites.
All information contained herein should be independently verified
by you with the advertising company or with Monitored Company or
any other sources you prefer.
[THIS IS ONLY A SUMMARY OF, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO, THE &EQUITYALERT SUBSCRIBER AGREEMENT AND
DISCLAIMER.8 PLEASE VISIT
http://www.equityalert.com/home/disclaim.asp
FOR ACCESS TO OUR COMPLETE DISCLAIMER]
******************************************************************


- CA110100.1


Dave, How about tommorrow at 2 pm central.  Let me know.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Fuller, Dave
Sent:	Wednesday, August 22, 2001 3:43 PM
To:	Nemec, Gerald
Cc:	Whitt, Mark
Subject:	Cascade

Gerald,

Is there a good time at which Mark Whitt and I could call you and discuss the Cascade deal?  Shoot me a time that works for you and we'll call you.  I doubt it would take more than half an hour.

Thanks,

Dave Fuller
503-464-3732


The only one I am aware of is Kimball,which Lisa is handling.

	William S Bradford
	11/20/2000 08:34 PM

		 To: Rebecca Ford/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: (bcc: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT)
		 Subject: Re: Status of bankrupt companies

Still no response from legal.   Will follow up when I get a response.

Bill

Rebecca Ford
11/13/2000 11:15 AM
To: William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Status of bankrupt companies

I have not heard the status on these counterparties.  Do you have any updates?

Thanks,
Becky

To: Lisa Mellencamp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bonnie
White/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Molly Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rebecca
Ford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Georgeanne Hodges/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Status of bankrupt companies

Lisa/Richard/Bonnie,

Please give me an update of the following bankruptcy claims.  We need to make
a determination if we should write off these receivables but would like to
get input from you on any potential recovery before we move forward.  On a
broader issue, do you have any report outlining outstanding bankruptcy
preceedings or litigation that I may get a copy of on a regular basis so we
can more effectively manage the credit and workout related issues on the
trading portfolio?

Please advise.

Bill

From:  Tanya Rohauer
   10/31/2000 08:54 AM

To: Molly Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Status of bankrupt companies

---------------------- Forwarded by Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT on 10/31/2000 08:49
AM ---------------------------

Rebecca Ford
10/31/2000 08:11 AM
To: Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Status of bankrupt companies

Hi Tanya and Debbie,

I was wondering if I could get an update as to the status of the following
bankrupt companies:

Alma Energy Corp.
Kimball Trading Company
Southern Mineral Corp.

For each company, we have an outstanding receivable on our A/R.  I was
wondering if, in each case, we expected to see some money to offset the
receivable, or if there was a slim chance that we would receive anything in
bankruptcy proceedings.

Please advise.

Thank you,
Becky


I will come by sometime after 8:30 am if that is okay.

Thanks!
JMF

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Melodick, Kim
Sent:	Thursday, May 31, 2001 4:20 PM
To:	Forney, John M.
Subject:	A note to you
Sensitivity:	Confidential

I have asked Charles Taylor to give you a call.  You can reach him at x53365.  Based on our discussion, I think he has some things that may be interesting to you.  Stop by my desk if you want further detail.


Please share with your organizations.
---------------------- Forwarded by Brenda F Herod/HOU/ECT on 05/02/2000
12:15 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Brenda F Herod                           05/02/2000 12:15 PM

To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kristin Albrecht/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila
Glover/HOU/ECT, D Todd Hall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peggy Hedstrom/CAL/ECT@ECT, Michael
E Moscoso/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eugenio Perez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Pleus/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen P
Schwarz/HOU/ECT@ECT, James Scribner/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mary
Solmonson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Mills/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Norma Villarreal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hector McLoughlin/Corp/Enron@Enron, Susan
Harrison/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Jackson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Patti Thompson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Shoemake/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kelly
Templeton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lynn Tippery/HOU/ECT@ECT, Maria
Sandoval/HOU/ECT@ECT, Irena D Hogan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly
Perkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marvia Jefferson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cecilia
Olvera/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer Jordan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Chantelle
Villanueva/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Organizational Changes

Last week you all received a memo from Brent Price which described changes
within Gas Operations, excluding Texas.  Attached is an organizational chart
for the Texas region.

We too continue to look for efficiencies to ensure we meet the demands of our
customers.  We currently support the Texas trading region, Bammel Storage
Facility, Houston Pipeline, Powder River Gathering and Bridgeline.  I am
pleased to announce that we will also combine Risk Management, Deal
Validation and Operational Analysis under the management of Steve Venturatos
who will serve as the Business Controller.  Dave Baumbach will fill the Lead
position.  Ami Chokshi will move from Trading Support to the new group,
continuing in the role of the Entex and TUFCO account manager.  Jody Crook
also will join the team.  Bryan Hull will transition his knowledge over the
next month, and will be moving to has second rotation, effective 6/5/00.
Additionally, Will Kelly will transition the Denver trading books to the
Texas team as he moves to the East Region.  Transportation Management under
Mary Smith will NOT be integrated into the team as their day-to-day
responsibilities and projects are not cohesively aligned with this group.
Please join me in welcoming the new team members as well as the team members
who will continue in the group.

Mike Eiben will step in the role previously managed by Steve Venturatos which
includes Global Contracts and Facilities, System Enhancements and Regulatory
Reporting.  In addition, Clem Cernosek and Jennifer Pattison will be assuming
new responsibilities in Logistics and Volume Management, respectively.  Both
Clem and Jennifer have been on the Unify team, focused on POPS.  Please wish
these folks success in their new roles.

All responsibility changes are effective 5/1/00.

Please share this with your staffs.


Tana:

The following CPs are not approved to trade US power products:

Panamsat Corp. - restricted by credit
Providence Gas Company - not a current CP/not Ferc approved
Shell Chemical Co. - not a current CP/not Ferc approved

Leslie


Start Date: 3/3/01; HourAhead hour: 23;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Generation schedule.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001030323.txt

---- Generation Schedule ----
+++ Hour 23 - bad data from ISO.
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: Wheelabrat
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 3/3/01
  UNIT_ID: MARTEL_2_AMFOR

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 23 / Preferred:  67.15 / Final:  66.94)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: SCE1
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 3/3/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


Mike,
Your cell phone is not working or has been disconnected and I have no way to reach you. Please update me with your contact information as soon as possible.
Thanks,

Bill


EFF_DT PORTFOLIO_ID DOWN95
1/17/01  MANAGEMENT-COAL 2,949.
1/17/01  MANAGEMENT-CRD 24,764.
1/17/01  MANAGEMENT-GAS 778,397.
1/17/01  MANAGEMENT-PWR 179,421.
1/17/01  AGG-MANAGEMENT 707,236.


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/04/2001
03:27 PM ---------------------------

Ben Parsons
04/04/2001 08:47 AM
To: Iris Mack/ENRON@enronXgate
cc: Vasant Shanbhogue/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Salmon/EU/Enron@Enron, Bryan Seyfried/LON/ECT@ECT, Nigel Price/LON/ECT@ECT,
Tomas Valnek/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Enron Credit Model Docs

Iris

Vasant informed me that you would be helping the quant efforts of Enron
Credit, with the first job to be compiling model documentation to be sent to
Darrell Duffie. I've attached below a pretty complete set of current docs we
have produced, in no particular order:

Nigel's doc on FMC curve generation (he claims it is out of date now though):

FMCMATHS.DOC

My doc on general theory we're using for pricing and default probability
generation:

CREDIT PRICING 2.1.DOC

My doc on asset swap calculation (there is one error to correct)

ASSET SWAP DFIS.PDF

My doc on Placement Model (a second version of the model incorporating
ratings has yet to be documented)

PLACEMENT MODEL 1.0.1.DOC

George's doc on the neural network placement model:

NEURAL NETWORK 1.0.DOC

My doc on the VAR model used for credit:

VAR MODEL 1.0 .DOC

and Kirstee's which preceded it:

CREDITVAR2.DOC

Nigel's doc on the portfolio model used for CDOs and basket trades:

SYNTHETICCDOS.DOC

Katherine's doc on correlations:

CORRELATIONS.DOC

Let me know if you need any more information about these models and their
applications.

Regards

Ben

PS I've had to zip the files up as they were too big:


Tom has come to a decision on what to do with the ubiquitous accrual value.
60% of this value should be credited to Greg's Transport expense on a monthly
basis.  Tom, in turn, will cover Ed on this portion of the expense.

For example:

Accrual Value comes out to be $300,000 for the month of April.

This means that:

Greg's portion of this value is 60% of $300,000 = $180,000
Tom's portion of this value is 40% of $300,000 = $120,000

Greg's Transport Expense is ($700,000)
So, Tom will cover                      $180,000 of this expense
Greg's adjusted Expense is   ($520,000)

Greg's P&L is net better off by the $180,000 of accrual value
Tom's P&L is net better off by $120,000  of accrual value which had not been
previously recognized.
Ed's P&L is net unchanged from all of the above.

Call with questions.

Eric
x3-0977


My revisions. Let's discuss at your earliest convenience.

Ben

	From:  Kay Mann @ ENRON                           09/08/2000 01:48 PM

To: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: ESA equipment purchase

Ben,

Here's a draft of an MOU for the sale of the LMs and ABB equipment to ESA.
One issue is when this transaction can close.  Since the equipment is owned
by WestLB and since the feeling is we don't want to involve WestLB in the
transaction, the actual transfer would take place at the termination of the
WestLB facility.  If another approach is preferred, we will need to circle
back with Lisa.

A second issue I see is with the concept that GE will need to look to both
ENA (or WestLB's successor) for some of the payments, but look to ESA for
payment for changes, storage, etc.  As far as I know, this concept hasn't
been addressed with GE.

I re-calculated the overhead charge, so you might want to check it out.

I look forward to your comments.

Kay


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 04/25/2000 02:01
PM ---------------------------

Angie Zeman@ENRON
04/25/2000 01:53 PM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robin Barbe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Hendrickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dick Jenkins/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Pipeline Restriction

---------------------- Forwarded by Angie Zeman/Corp/Enron on 04/25/2000
01:48 PM ---------------------------

Ora_L_Ash@CNGT.CNG.COM on 04/25/2000 01:44:29 PM
To: CUSTOMERS@CNG.COM
cc:
Subject: Pipeline Restriction

                                   ORA L. ASH
                                CUSTOMER ANALYST
                             DOMINION TRANSMISSION
                 P. O. BOX 2450,  CLARKSBURG,  WV   26302-2450
                        E-MAIL:  ORA_L_ASH@CNGT.CNG.COM
                     PHONE:  304-623-8546  FAX 304-623-8321
                               PAGER 304-987-3254

                              PIPELINE RESTRICTION

     Beginning Thursday, April 27,2000, at 10:00 a.m. est., there will be no
capacity for any
interruptible or secondary transportation delivered from Iroquois Gas
Transmission to Dominion
Transmission at Canajoharie.  This restriction will remain in place until
further notice.


Start Accepting Credit Cards Today!

  <http://www.megafriends.com/images/money.gif>
Your business MUST be accepting Credit Cards from your customers!

Over 97% of all sales on the Internet are done with Credit Cards.

Over 92% of mail orders and telephone-orders are done with Credit Cards.

If you don't take Credit Cards, 9 out of every 10 potential customers can't do business with you!

We specialize in on-line businesses, mail order and telephone order businesses, start-ups, in-home businesses as well as retail locations.

* In other words, we specialize in YOUR business *

Simply fill out this short application and
a representative will contact you shortly.

Applicant Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email Address:
Business Phone:
Home Phone:
Please place comments here

oynkznhfqeiyohwq


Peggy:

Considering where we are in the divestiture process, I don't think it is the right time to have PGE contract for and administer the Health and Welfare Benefits noted in your memo dated 04/20/01.  In addition, it is likely that a potential buyer would want PGE to come under its own Health and Welfare Benefits.  Switching now could entail having PGE employees being under three Plans in a relatively short period of time.

Stan


Attached is the ERMS Discounting Memo as of 9/26/01.

Please note that the 9/26/2001 balance is based on the new method of calculating the discounting amount.  The changes that were made are as followed:

			Old method	New method
Physical contract 	55 days		55 days
Financial contract	55 days		5 days
Financial calendar	55 days		38 days

Please let me know if you have questions.

Thanks
Anita


Notice # 01-137
April 20, 2001

TO:
All New York Mercantile Exchange Members and Member Firms

FROM:
Neal L. Wolkoff, Executive Vice President

RE:
Rule Changes to Implement enymex(sm)

DATE:
April 19, 2001

===========================================================

Please be advised that the NYMEX Board of Directors has approved a number
of rule changes, which are summarized below, to incorporate the
implementation of enymexK. These rule changes, which have been filed with
the CFTC and thus may become effective at any time, will be implemented
upon the launch of enymexK.

An unmarked version of these rule changes can be found on the Exchange's
website.  A hard copy "black-line" version of the rule changes, which shows
changes from the current rules, can be obtained by calling Kelly Ann Neeson
at (212) 299-2217 in the Exchange's Legal Department.

The rule changes include the following areas: trading; position limits,
accountability and reporting; arbitration, Clearing Member obligations and
a summary disciplinary procedure for denial of access.

     Trading Rules
A number of changes are being made to existing rules to reflect the
roll-out of enymexK, such as expanding such rules to cover both NYMEX
ACCESS7 and enymexK.  For example, the NYMEX ACCESS7 error trade rule has
been retitled and revised to cover error trades occurring on either system.

EFP and EFS. Similarly, Rule 6.21B and 6.21C are the Exchange's rules that
respectively govern EFP and EFS transactions for futures contracts traded
only on NYMEX ACCESS7, i.e., electricity futures contracts.  These rules
will now also govern enymexK EFP and EFS transactions.

Settlement Procedures. New NYMEX Rule 6.52E ("enymexK Settlement Price
Procedures") was modeled upon the current settlement price rule for
electricity contracts trading only on NYMEX ACCESS7. Thus, settlement
prices generally would be determined manually by the Settlement Committee,
or if the Settlement Committee was not available, by Exchange staff using
the same criteria used by the applicable Settlement Committee.  However,
one difference is that the electricity settlement rule provides that no
settlement price shall be established that would be lower than the best bid
or higher than the best offer that: (a) was for at least twenty-five (25)
contracts, and (b) had been posted with the Exchange and remained available
for execution and unfilled for the final 30 minutes of trading.  By
comparison, new NYMEX Rule 6.52E contains more general language that would
allow the Exchange to customize for each enymexK contract the bids and
offers that would be protected in the settlement!
 process.

Position Limits, Accountability and Reporting.  With regard to the four
physical delivery enymexK crude oil contracts, the amendments to NYMEX
Rules 9.26 and 9.27 provide for position accountability in the back months
and a spot month limit of 2,000 contracts for each of these four contracts.
Also, the Exchange's current hedge exemption procedures will be made
applicable to the enymexK contracts. With regard to the cash-settled
enymexK contracts, the rule amendments provide for position accountability
across all contract months. The amendments to Rule 9.34 establish a
reporting level of 25 contracts for each enymexK contract, the same
reporting level currently used for many other Exchange contracts. However,
NYMEX staff also has initiated discussions with CFTC staff regarding
possible regulatory relief to exempt market participants from these
reporting requirements to the CFTC for the cash-settled contracts.

Brokerage and Clearing Member Financial Responsibility. As to brokerage,
new Rule 9.04A ("enymexK Trading") permits brokerage to be done for enymexK
products.  Section (C) of new Rule 9.04A clarifies that a Clearing Member
will be financially responsible for trades done for each account it
carries, even if there is a system malfunction.

     Arbitration Rules
The Exchange's arbitration rules are being amended to reference Non-Member
enymexK Users and to provide that disputes between a Member and a
Non-Member enymexK User or between Non-Member enymexK Users would be
subject to Exchange arbitration on a permissive rather than on a mandatory
basis.

     Summary Disciplinary Procedures
The sole disciplinary sanction that would be applicable to a Non-Member
enymexK User would be denial of further direct access to the system.
Consistent with this approach, new Exchange Rule 8.99A establishes a
summary disciplinary procedure that would allow the Exchange to take action
when necessary on an expedited basis.

Please note that Exchange Members who are enymexK Users also will continue
to be subject to Exchange rules.

If you have any questions concerning these rules, please contact
Christopher K. Bowen, Senior Vice President and General Counsel, NYMEX
Legal Department, at (212) 299-22200; or Brian Regan, Senior Associate
General Counsel, NYMEX Legal Department, at (212) 299-2207.

      Carr Futures
      150 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 1500
      Chicago, IL 60606  USA
      Tel:  312-368-6149
      Fax:  312-368-2281
      soblander@carrfut.com
      http://www.carrfut.com


We can meet at my meager apartment if you like.  Around 7?

	Jacqueline Kelly <JKelly@FairIsaac.com>
	11/08/2000 01:54 PM

		 To: "Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)" <dasovich@haas.berkeley.edu>
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: MPAR Team Assignment Change

How lame is this e-mail...

(Did you complain about being on my team??)

Where are we meeting tonight?  I think I may have your case study...I have
someone's.

See you tonight,
Jackie

-----Original Message-----
From: Meg St. John [mailto:mstjohn@haas.berkeley.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2000 11:32 AM
To: kelly@haas.berkeley.edu
Subject: MPAR Team Assignment Change

Jackie,

We have changed your team assignment for the Mid Program Academic
Retreat.  You were assigned to Atlantic 5, but that team had more members
than any other and we needed to reshuffle to achieve some parity.

You are now assigned to Atlantic 4.

This means that your Pre-Meeting will occur on Tuesday, and not Wednesday.

Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions or concerns that
you may have.

Thank you,

Meg St. John
Assistant Director, Evening MBA Program
(510) 527-1406


How is it going?  Did you survive the honeymoon?


Kristin:

We are sending the Interview Request Form information to Molly Magee to
bring the following two candidates in for interviews:

Frank (Feng) Qian
Punit Rawal

We have no further interest in the following two candidates.  Do you handle
contacting them?

Heap-Ho Tan
Kyubaek Heo

Thanks!

Shirley


She is now.  I don't think she had a choice.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Franklin, Cynthia" <Cynthia.Franklin@ElPaso.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Monday, January 28, 2002 11:20 AM
To:	Germany, Chris
Subject:	RE: Judy

Is she full time?

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris.Germany@enron.com [mailto:Chris.Germany@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 11:14 AM
To: Franklin, Cynthia
Subject: RE: Judy

Yes maam, she's UBS now.  She was just down here too.

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   "Franklin, Cynthia" <Cynthia.Franklin@ElPaso.com>@ENRON
   Sent:   Monday, January 28, 2002 10:56 AM
   To:     Germany, Chris
   Subject:  Judy

   Chris,
   I didn't remember if your email mentioned Judy. Did she make it?

   Cindy Franklin
   Transportation Services
   Work:832.676.3177
   Fax: 832.676.1329
   Pager: 1.888.509.3736

   ******************************************************************
   This email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso
   Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the
   use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
   If you have received this email in error please notify the
   sender.
   ******************************************************************

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************

******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso
Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the
use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the
sender.
******************************************************************


Good letter!

	Adriane Schultea/ENRON@enronXgate
	05/17/2001 10:34 AM

		 To: smithtm6@bp.com@SMTP@enronXgate
		 cc: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: FW: FW: CA for Green Mountain

Tim,

We appreciate you sending us Green Mountain's Confidentiality Agreement,
however we have a standard agreement that we would prefer to use.  Please
have your legal department review the attached document and let me know if
this will be sufficient.  If yes, we will get the application process
underway.  Thank you so much for your time and patience.

If you have any questions or concerns regarding our Confidentiality Agreement
please contact Tana Jones at 713-853-3399.  However, feel free to contact me
also
713-345-9360.

Thanks again,
Adriane

	Adriane Schultea/ENRON@enronXgate 05/15/2001 11:47 AM 	   To: Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT  cc:   Subject: FW: CA for Green Mountain

thanks,
Tana!!!

 -----Original Message-----
From:  "Smith, Timothy M" <smithtm6@bp.com>@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Smith+2C+20Timothy+20M+22+20+3Csmithtm6+40bp+2Ecom+3E+40
ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 12:09 PM
To: Schultea, Adriane
Subject: CA for Green Mountain

Adriane,

Here's our Confidentiality Agreement for execution before we release our
financials.  Please let me know if you have any feedback.  Thanks.

TMS

 <<Form Unilat Confidentiality Agt - Application Service Provider ENRON
5-3-011.ZIP>>

 - Form Unilat Confidentiality Agt - Application Service Provider ENRON
5-3-011.ZIP


Hi Iris,

Thanks for your messages. Please, call me on my cell phone (713) 410 5396
or at my office (713) 853 3848.

By the way, the 2nd file you sent is password protected.

Vince


Dan,

Here is some of the things we need to discuss.  Les may want to add to this.
We will see you tommorrow at your office.  Thanks.


PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL:  ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATION, ATTORNEY WORK
PRODUCT

Here's an update (Matt, if any of this appears inaccurate to you, don't
hesitate to point it out):

1.  The pending joint survey.

 (a) The joint survey has yet to be scheduled.  The reason for the delay is
an issue concerning whether SGS's Singapore laboratory has the
resources/competence to carry out the joint analysis.  Steve Jones, ECT's
choice of chemist, is communicating with SGS in order to make this
determination.  Although this has delayed scheduling the joint testing, Jones
feels strongly that it will be most cost-effective for ECT to proceed with a
joint analysis only after making this determination.  I (and Matt) have
personally spoken with Jones about this and believe he understands that ECT
is looking for the quickest, most cost-effective resolution to this dispute
with Mitsubishi.  Because of the issue with SGS, Jones has waited until now
to send the proposed testing program to Technichem, Mitsubishi's choice of
surveyor/chemist  (in a previous report, I mentioned that the testing program
had already been sent to Technichem; this now turns out not to be the case).
By today, Jones should have sent the proposed testing program to Technichem,
in order to get the ball rolling, and with the expectation that Technichem
will have comments that will require time to incorporate.

 (b) If things go well with SGS, Jones anticipates scheduling a joint
analysis about two-three weeks from now.  Jones plan to personally attend the
joint survey on our behalf, given the complexity of the testing methods.
Even after that testing, Jones anticipates the possibility of further testing
in England using highly specialized equipment to determine whether the
apparent filterable dirt buildup was caused by a malfunction of the vessel's
inert gas system.

2. Costs.

 (a)  Surveyors/chemists:

 (1) Jones advises that to date, he and his firm have spent a total of about
5.5 days at 720 pounds per day, for a total of approximately 3,960 pounds, or
roughly $5,742 at the current USD/pounds exchange rate of $1.45/1 pound.
Jones has subcontracted some of his work to Allen Goddard, now with ITS-Caleb
Brett, who specializes in the type of testing at issue.  Jones estimates that
Goddard has spent approximately one day on this matter, at a daily rate of
600 lbs, or $870.

 (2)  Jones estimates that from this point until the actual joint survey
begins, he will spend about two more days, and Goddard will spend about
another one-half day.  This totals about 1,740 pounds, or $2,523.

 (3)   For the actual joint testing, Jones estimates that he will spend about
twelve days straight, including transit time; Goddard would not attend, but
would be available by telephone if Jones had a question.  Twelve days' time
amounts to 8,640 pounds, or $12,528, not including aire fare, room and board.

 (4)  Afterwards, for the additional testing in England to determine whether
the inert gas system caused the buildup in filterable dirt, Jones estimates
another 2,000 pounds for the cost of the lab; he does not know at this point
whether he would attend the entire testing procedure, which he believes could
be
completed in about two days.  If he attended both days, this additional
testing in England would run to another 3,440 pounds, or $4,988.

 (b) Other experts:

 (1) SGS and Caleb Brett's costs to date are being compiled by Matt.  SGS
will spend another SGD 2,000 purchasing the necessary chemicals for the joint
testing, and bill for another SGD 2,000 for pre-joint-analysis development
work (basically, practicing on extra samples from the PACIFIC VIRGO).  This
comes to a total of SGD 4,000, or  about $2,325 to prepare for the joint
analysis, based on the current reported SGD/USD exchange rate of 1.72/1.  SGS
estimates that it will bill us for the joint analysis SGD 9,500, or about
$5,523.

 (2) Captain Sawant of PacMarine, one of our ship operations experts, will be
charging us SGD 25,000, or about $14,500  for work done to date, which should
be largely concluded with the finalization of his report.

 (3)  Captain Gregory of Noble Denton, the ship operation expert we would
probably use for testifying, has been asked to do no work on this matter at
this time.

 (c) Attorneys:

 (1) David Best is out of town on vacation, but his office advises that his
time and expenses to date amounts to approximately 8,300 pounds, or about
$12,035.  This is subject to being adjusted up or down, once Best gets back
in the office and has time to review the bill.  I imagine that this bill does
not include the time incurred by a barrister that Best called for advice on
the FGH issue.  Neither Best nor anyone from his firm will need to attend the
joint testing.

 (2) Neale Gregson's firm, Watson, Farley, has incurred fees and expense to
date of SGD 105,000, or about $61,000.  Matt has not yet seen an itemized
bill for this time, but feels that while it is high, it is not unexpected,
given the time-intensive nature of this matter.  Matt will be asking Gregson
whether the time also includes time spent on the FGH matter.

 (3) My and my legal assistant's fee and expenses through today amount to
approximately $12,500.  This also includes time spent on the FGH matter,
although, pursuant to Alan's instructions, I am no longer spending time on
that matter, except where necessary to keep Janice Moore apprised.

 (d) Summary of Costs.

 In sum, no less than approximately $106,000 has been spent to date, and this
figure will increase once I get the SGS and Caleb Brett costs to date, and
once David Best comes back from vacation on September 11 and reviews his bill
(although these figures probably include a heavy overlap of time spent on the
FGH matter).  Another $5,325 will be necessary to get ready for the joint
analysis; another $18,000 to perform the joint analysis in Singapore, and
another approximately $5,000 to perform specialized testing in London after
the joint analysis is done (if Steve Jones determines that such further
testing is necessary).

3.  Recent Sale of Thailand cargo.

 (a) You will recall that the bulk of the product from the M/V PACIFIC VIRGO
was discharged in to shore tanks in Thailand and has not been tendered to
FGH, given the problems with the product discharged later in the Phillipines,
which was tendered to FGH, who rejected it.  Samples from the shore tanks in
Thailand have recently been tested by SGS's laboratory in the U.S. and
reportedly found on spec.  All of the Thailand product has recently been sold
to Caltex, Singapore, for delivery September 7-9, reportedly for use in
Caltex's refinery, which makes the risk of rejection of that product by
Caltex very low.

 (b) Unfortunately, Matt advises that the trader cannot give us even a
ballpark figure for the sales price of the Thailand product until the end of
the month, given that the price is tied to some market index.  Lacking this,
it is difficult to estimate what total diminution in market value of the
Elang crude ECT has sustained until then.  We were previously told that the
product discharged in Singapore sustained a diminution in market value of
about $288,000.  For my own purposes, based on nothing more than speculation,
and given that the bulk of the cargo was discharged in Thailand, I am using
the working hypothesis that ECT's total damages for diminution of market
value of all the product discharged from the M/V PACIFIC VIRGO is in the
range of $600,000-$750,000.  Again, this may later turn out to be very
inaccurate.

4.  Expert witness supplemental opinion

  At my request, Captain Sawant, our consulting expert on ship operations,
was asked whether he believed that ECT's instructions to the ship regarding
tank washing would have been sufficient to prevent the type of contamination
that occurred had such instructions been properly carried out (i.e., if the
ship had access to fresh water).  Captain Sawant has opined that he does not
believe such instructions were sufficient to have prevented the type of
contamination that occurred.   While we can protect Captain Sawant's opinion
from discovery by using him only as a consulting expert, it strikes me that
Mitsubishi will likely not overlook this issue.  Despite this, however, ECT
still has some argument that the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act puts a
non-delegable duty to provide a cargoworthy ship on Mitsubishi.


Hello Everyone,

	This week again saw some upsets, both in college and pro games, however, the overall results were better this week than the past few weeks. In the college games, it was split between the Oklahoma and Nebraska game as far as who got it right, the Auburn/Arkansas game and UCLA/Stanford game were both missed by most people. Quite a few people also missed the Oregon/Washington St. game.
In the pros, the New Orleans/St.Louis game was missed by just about everyone, everyone missed the NY Giants/Washington game, the Minnesota/Tampa Bay game was missed by quite a few people, and the Arizona/Dallas game was also missed by about half the people.

	Through all that, Rob Benson is currently in the lead with only 5 games missed. Rob also picked Pittsburgh tonight. Still alive for the money with 6 games missed are Joe Quenet and Jeff Miller, who both picked Tennessee tonight. There were also 3 other people who have 6 wrong, however, they all chose Pittsburgh tonight. Therefore, if Pittsburgh wins tonight, then Rob will win outright. If Tennessee wins tonight, then it will come down to total points. Rob chose 38 points, Joe has 48 points and Jeff has 34 points. Therefore Jeff will win with a Tennessee victory and 35 or fewer total points, 36 he will tie with Rob. Rob will also win if Tennessee wins and the total points are from 37-42 and he will also tie with Joe at 43 points. Joe will win if Tennessee wins and there is 44 or more total points scored, 43 he will split with Rob.

	We raised the entry fee to $3 per entry this week and will continue that for the rest of the season unless enough people want it back down to $2. We had 34 entries this weekend, therefore the prize money is $102 !!  There is no Thursday night game this upcoming week, therefore this coming week's picks will be due on Friday. Following is each person who played this week with the amount of games they missed.

												Andy

Rob Benson		5
Joe Quenet		6
Jeff Miller		6
Reagan Mathews	6
Tom Chapman		6
Daniel Jenkins		6
Rick Broussard		7
Dave Ryan		7
Jaime Gualy		7
Larry Campbell		7
Cory Willis		7
Gautam Gupta		7
Michele Wilks		8
Bryce Schneider	8
Andy Pace		8
Pat Hanse		8
Russell Ballato		8
Kayne Coulter		8
Steve Pan		8
Carter Ellis		8
Valerie Ramsower	9
Robert Vargas		9
Diana Allen		9
Todd DeCook		9
Thomas Lowell		9
Ryan Williams		10
Clayton Vernon		10
Larry Jester		10
Joe Brewer		10
Mike Roan		11
Smith Day		12
Rudy Acevedo		12
Ashish Mahajan		13
Joe Step		15


With guarded optimism I believe we have reached an agreement.   I await the
final draft from their counsel for execution.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Sam,

Maureen's article will be OK. Stinson can take a look at the final version on
Monday.

Vince

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  William Smith @ ENRON                           10/18/2000 06:37 AM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Newsletter, Monday 23 Oct.

Vince,

I see that you are flying around a lot this week, but I wanted to let you
know how it's going with the newsletter.  I've scheduled Steve Bigelow as the
"person of the week."  Regarding Technical Corner, I sent you a copy of
Maureen's article for your review.  Bob Lee told me he has also sent you
something.  I'd appreciate your guidance on which one to use.  I believe
Maureen's is time-sensitive, so I'd vote for that one if you've had a chance
to look it over.

I'm going to be out of town the rest of today and Thursday-Friday to attend
my uncle's funeral in Illinois.  If you fly over Illinois, please wave! :-)

Have a safe trip(s),

Sam


Please join us on Thursday, August 10 in the Enron Suite at Enron Field for
some baseball fun.  The game starts at 3:05 p.m., so plan to leave the office
around 2:00 p.m.

Appetizers will be served.

Cindy will be handing out tickets sometime that morning.

Please let her know if you will be unable to attend the game.

Thanks


No problem.  Doug is a good guy that I want to put under contract.  What's
the status with his immigration?  Could we be in a scenario that he has to
work our of canada for a while?

Jeff

Shanna Funkhouser@ENRON
10/17/2000 10:07 PM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Doug Arnel

Jeff,

Jane Allen and I met with Doug today to discuss the green card procedure for
he and his wife.  We will start this process immediately, but it's a long
road - approx 2.5 years.

Doug asked if we would be willing to cover immigration attorney fees for his
wife should she find an employer willing to file for a work permit, but is
unable to pay legal fees of  $2-3,000.  It is fairly common that Enron would
cover legal fees for the spouse in this situation, but I will need your ok.

Shanna


Attached, please find Enron's proposed amendment to ABX 18 regarding the
rate freeze which was prepared by Mike Day.

 - Amendments for ABX-18 - version 1-30-01.doc


Mark Haedicke will hold a floor meeting for EWS Legal in Houston this afternoon, Monday, November 12, at 2:00 p.m.  The location will be outside of conference room EB3824.  Please plan to attend.

Thank you.

Janette Elbertson
on behalf of Mark E. Haedicke
Enron Wholesale Services
Legal Department
Telephone:  (713) 853-7906
Fax:  (713) 646-2600
e-mail:  janette.elbertson@enron.com


Andrew -
My login name is "ksymes" and my password is "kajt8kajt." Thank you so much
for your attention to this problem.

Kate

Michael Tully
04/23/2001 12:22 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: david.poston@enron.com

Subject: CAPS Problems

Andrew Hawthorn just called me about your access denied errors that you are
getting through Term Server. He would like for you to e-mail him your login
username and password so that he may correct this issue.

Mike Tully


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 11/15/2000 04:09 PM -----

	Ginger Dernehl
	11/10/2000 03:38 PM

		 To: Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Eric Thode/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Karen
Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Peggy Mahoney/HOU/EES@EES, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Aleck Dadson/TOR/ECT@ECT, Allison Navin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Amy
Fabian/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Barbara A Hueter/NA/Enron@Enron, Bernadette
Hawkins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bill Moore/NA/Enron@Enron, Carolyn
Cooney/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Charles Yeung/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chauncey
Hood/NA/Enron@ENRON, Chris Long/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Christi L
Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cynthia Sandherr/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Damon
Harvey/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Dan Staines/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daniel
Allegretti/NA/Enron@Enron, Dave Mangskau/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Donald
Lassere/NA/Enron@Enron, Elizabeth Linnell/NA/Enron@Enron, Frank
Rishe/NA/Enron@Enron, Geriann Warner/NA/Enron@Enron, Ginger
Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron, Gloria Ogenyi/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Howard Fromer/NA/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Janine Migden/NA/Enron@Enron, Jean R
Dressler/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Brown/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeffrey Keeler/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joe
Allen/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe Connor/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joe Hillings/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joseph
Alamo/NA/Enron@Enron, Kathleen Sullivan/NA/Enron@ENRON, Kathy
Mongeon/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kerry Stroup/NA/Enron@Enron,
Kirsten Bellas/NA/Enron@Enron, Lara Leibman/NA/Enron@Enron, Laurie
Knight/NA/Enron@Enron, Leslie Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda J
Noske/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Linda
Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Lindsay Meade/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Lisa Yoho/HOU/EES@EES, Lora Sullivan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lysa Akin/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Marchris Robinson/NA/Enron@Enron, Marcia A Linton/NA/Enron@Enron, Marcie
Milner/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Maureen
McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron, Mona L Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, Nancy
Hetrick/NA/Enron@Enron, Patrick Keene/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Richard Ingersoll/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Robert Frank/NA/Enron@Enron, Robert
Hemstock/CAL/ECT@ECT, Robert Neustaedter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Robin Kittel/NA/Enron@Enron, Ron McNamara/NA/Enron@Enron, Roy
Boston/HOU/EES@EES, Rubena Buerger/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott
Bolton/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Stephen D
Burns/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steve Montovano/NA/Enron@Enron, Steve
Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Sue Nord/NA/Enron@Enron,
Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Susan M Landwehr/NA/Enron@Enron, Terri
Miller/HOU/EES@EES, Thane Twiggs/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Tom
Briggs/NA/Enron@Enron, Tom Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Delaney/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Tom Hoatson/NA/Enron@Enron, Tracy Cooper/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Vinio Floris/Corp/Enron@Enron, Xi Xi/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc:
		 Subject: FERC Staff Investigations on Midwest and Southeast Bulk Power
Systems

	Christi L Nicolay@ECT
	11/10/2000 03:22 PM

		 To: Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: FERC Staff Investigations on Midwest and Southeast Bulk Power
Systems

Please forward this to Rick's group.  Thanks.

Please note that these FERC staff reports contain some potentially helpful
information that can be used at the state PUC level, including information on
the increase in generation in the Midwest that market participants attribute
to lack of price caps following the summer 1998 price spikes; better
preparation for summer 2000 through the use of forward contracts and
transmission problems that may have resulted in keeping cheaper power from
particular markets.

On 11/1/00, FERC Staff issued reports on its Investigation of Bulk Power
Markets in the Eastern Interconnection.  These reports were the result of a
Commission order earlier this summer.  Enron's Federal regulatory staff
(Christi, Charles Yeung, and Sarah Novosel) provided a great deal of
information for this investigation and Joe Hartsoe and Donna Fulton discussed
many of the problems with the grid with the new head of Staff, Scott Miller
(who recently joined FERC from PG&E Gen).    While the Commission is under no
obligation to take any of Staff's recommendations, the Commission typically
looks to Staff for guidance on transmission and market issues.  Importantly,
Staff concludes that the Commission should consider these options for the
Southeast and Midwest -- all of which Enron has been asking FERC to implement
for several years:

Reduce the advantages of network service over point to point service by
requiring that native load be served under the same tariff as other
transmission services to eliminate the current incentives that VIUs have to
favor their native load through the calculation of ATC and handling of
interconnection requests.

While the Staff Hotline is used productively, the Commission can direct Staff
to conduct formal investigations into entities that have a pattern of
complaints.

The Commission could require TPs to submit tariff provisions containing a pro
forma interconnection process specific to interconnection, rather than simply
relying on the Tennessee Power order that utilizes the OATT timelines and
procedures.

Require TPs to retain real-time transmission data on market functions
pertaining to daily load, internal generation to meet that load, and imports
and exports.

RTOs should submit the basis and methods for calculating ATC and TTC, as well
as standardized criteria for curtailment.  In addition, since even such
standardized criteria might not "get to the root of the problem" -- that
control area still control generation -- the Commission could require that
each RTO set a date certain by which it will create one control area.
Regardless of the implementation of these two options, the Commission could
standardize ATC and TTC methodology.

Staff finds that while electricity is a commodity with market characteristics
similar to many other commodities, it is still viewed as "different," with a
reaction of price caps.  Staff encourages that basic decisions about the
regulatory model be made in order to complete the transition from a
traditional cost-of-service model to a model that uses markets to price the
commodity and services.

DETAILS  (Also, the reports contain good summaries of the generation,
transmission, state retail, federal reg. and other issues for the region):

Midwest:  The Midwest is dominated by vertically integrated Transmission
Providers ("TPs") that control transmission, generation and load.  "As such,
they have weak economic incentives to provide access to transmission service
to third-parties and strong incentives to favor their own services."  Staff
received numerous complaints; however, due to the lack of information
available from TPs, Staff cannot conclude whether these are isolated
incidents or wide-spread.  At the very least, the complaints indicate a lack
of confidence in the bulk power market and the ability of market participants
to rely on transmission access, thus harming the liquidity of the market.

TLRs are the most important transmission issue in the Midwest, with an
"enormous" increase in 2000.  The region showed a decline in peak load from
1999 to 2000 and a growth in new generation since the 1998 price spikes.
Even though there was an increase in generation and mild weather with
virtually no price spikes, TLRs climbed to record numbers.  The TLRs were
highly concentrated:  only 5 flowgates account for 41% of ECAR TLRs and
another 5 flowgates in MAIN account for 42% in that region.  Notably, even
though the NERC procedures for Level 3 TLRs mandate transaction curtailment,
78 of the 191 TLRs in the Midwest do not show any curtailment amount.  The
total amount of relief that these curtailments are intended to produce are
not posted.  Staff notes that TLR rules are established by NERC, whose
procedures are voluntary and not enforced by penalties.  While the Commission
has required certain NERC standards and procedures to be placed in Open
Access Transmission Tariffs ("OATT") where the Commission has the power to
enforce provisions under the Federal Power Act, in practice the Commission
has generally deferred to NERC on transmission reliability questions,
including the propriety of TLRs.

TLRs inhibit optimal functioning of the transmission system and market
because load is not served by the least cost supplier.  TLR procedure is an
inefficient instrument in mitigating constraints -- curtailment by fiat.  In
addition, the NERC IDC can result in inappropriate curtailments or increased
loading on the affected flowgate.  The impact could be mitigated by one
control area per RTO.

Staff notes that the Midwest state commissions did not petition FERC for
price caps following the 1998 price spikes.  Some market participants believe
that the absence of price spikes is the single reason that NUG construction
increased in the Midwest.

Market participants must keep track of, and follow, a plethora of information
in order to make energy deals, submit reservations and provide schedules for
service.  Staff received many complaints about barriers to transmission
access, including TLR curtailments and a lack of standardized information and
protocols, particularly for ATC and interconnection requests, and
discriminatory conduct.  Unbelievably, key data was unavailable to Staff,
such coincident peak load data, system-wide snap shots for days when TLRs
were called, and import/export data.  This lack of data creates a market
inefficiency, because neither market participants nor regulators can fully
analyze market conditions in real time.  As such, the market is risk adverse,
eschewing long-term deals for short-term transactions.  Staff also noted that
because the Security Coordinators often work for the IOU, there is a mixed
incentive to enforce reliability on the grid and maximize profit for the
IOU.  (Staff cites Richard Tabors' paper, "Transmission Markets, Stretching
the Rules for Fun and Profit.")

Staff cites the lack of information on OASIS or on the NERC web site,
particularly about real time TLRs and curtailments.  Examples were provided
to Staff of transmission refusals when there were no TLRs posted and improper
implementation of TLRs causing substantial financial loss.

The currently proposed Midwest RTOs may mitigate some problems; however, all
three retain existing control areas with the favortism for generation and
native load.  These incentives will continue to remain until the RTO
exercises complete autonomy over transmission control and security
coordinator functions.  Staff notes that the Midwest is a balkanized region
of 61 control areas with no uniform method for calculating ATC and CBM.  The
result is that ATCs can be different on 2 different sides of an interface.
Staff notes examples in inaccurate ATCs and states that Staff's own ATC audit
this summer was consistent with market participant complaints.  Staff is
weighing follow-up options.  The result of these problems is a lack of
liquidity.

Staff next noted the problems with unfiled "business practices," especially
on the next hour market.  Staff's audit of OASIS sites revealed several areas
of non-compliance.

Information transparency is necessary for a market to function efficiently,
with equal and timely access to data, including ATC, CBM, TRM, and load flow
input data.  TPs have incentives to resist efforts to make this information
transparent because of native load.  This incentive will still exist under
RTOs if utilities are allowed to calculate their own ATC.  ***  "As a
consequence, the Commission may wish to eliminate the native load exemption
and have all transactions under the same tariff."  ***  The Commission could
benefit by having access to existing transmission data and should require the
TPs to retain data, including current real-time network status.

Interconnection Issues:  IPPs need to be compensated for VAR support.  Also,
Staff cites a number of Hotline complaints about TPs seeking large deposits
or failing to complete System Impact Studies timely.  One solution is to have
the RTO handle this function to eliminate the disincentive the utilities have
against IPPs.  The current practice of requiring IPPs to deal with a wide
variety of procedures inhibits the free flow of transactions within the
region.

Network service has inherent advantages over point-to-point, citing the
Entergy source and sink order.  The Commission has relied on "passively"
receiving informal and formal complaints to determine if discriminatory
behavior has occurred rather than actively canvassing market participants.
While Staff cannot conclude that discriminatory practices are widespread,
there is evidence of discriminatory instances.

Southeast:  The traditional vertically integrated utility ("VIU") model has
largely persisted in the SE.  This continued control has vastly reduced the
economic incentives to facilitate IPP activities.  In many cases, the VIUs
have dampened IPP involvement without violating any Commission regulation due
to the inherent flexibility of the current rules.

Staff cites examples of delays in performing system impact studies,
transmission hoarding in the name of serving native load growth and
manipulation of ATC.  TPs have shown little inclination to improve the
transmission system and use many TLRs.

There is also a lack of market information that has stymied the development
of markets in the SE.  ATCs change constantly that leads to uncertainty and
there is no clearinghouse for electric power prices.

TVA, despite having taken steps to participate in reformed markets, has acted
as a bulwark against the development of competitive energy markets in the
SE.  This is significant because of TVA's size and location.  IPPs have
reported TVA's discouragement of siting in TVA through excessive time to
perform studies, excessive fees, and rejection of requests to perform
interconnection studies.

In addition, Staff cites the Florida Sup. Ct. decision against merchant
plants as significantly impeding the competitive market in Florida.

Staff discusses the significant flow of power from the Midwest to the SE this
summer.  Much of this resulted from the import of cheaper coal power, than
the use of gas fired peakers due to higher gas prices.  Peak prices were
radically lower this summer because utilities appear to have been better
prepared for peak events through the use of forward contracts, increased
generation capacity on line and reduced number of forced outages.

SE utilities reported that they have not used market-based rates to
extensively increase sales.  (Less used than in the midwest.)

The SE region lacks information, which has retarded the Staff's efforts to
discern the truth about the numerous complaints about transmission in the SE
(including ATC and TLRs).  Market participants seem to have less confidence
in the SE market than in any other market region.  This appears to be
justified based on Staff's investigations.  This lack of confidence
discourages investment and participation in the markets.  Staff concludes
that the Commission may need to be more prescriptive in terms of how
transmission is allocated in the SE RTOs, since there are market concerns
that the incumbents will continue to dominate operations.  The investigation
found numerous problems in bad ATCs and TTCs and poor OASIS postings.  In
addition, several OASIS audit logs actually erased historical data.  Staff
thinks that additional affiliate transaction information should be posted.
Staff could not obtain summer demand data and the Commission's lack of
jurisdiction over TVA made it difficult to obtain transmission access
information.

The Staff investigation revealed unclear interconnection procedures and lack
of adherence to schedules and arbitrary cost estimates and deposits.  In
addition, the TPs have reserved a huge amount of network transmission
capacity, much of it reserved shortly after the IPP approached the TP to
interconnect.  Staff cites the recent Skygen order in which Southern denied
Skygen's request for transmission stating that the only option was the
construction of an 80 mile 500 kv line that would take 8 years to complete.
Staff solutions include allowing network requests by IPPs and limiting
self-build capacity in the incumbent's territory.

ATC variations are a big problem in the SE.  SERC coordination of a
standardized ATC is a long process and may not be resolved soon without
direction from the Commission.  An improved method and improved communication
are needed.

The SE experienced a 354% increase in TLRs this summer.  This increase raises
the issue of whether curtailment has become an impediment to the competitive
operation of the market in the SE.  Staff cites information provided by
Charles Y. that an Ameren TLR was not implemented according to NERC
criteria.  Staff also wonders if transmission is being oversold since TPs do
not generally refund transmission revenues when TLRs are implemented.  RTOs
must have a broad geographic area to internalize much of the constraints.  In
addition, RTOs will adopt pricing mechanisms that obviate recourse to TLRs.
However, if control areas are retained, VIUs will retain mixed incentives.

*** As noted in the Midwest report, the manner in which load is calculated
weighs heavily on the value of this information.  This is an issue that the
formation of RTOs may not resolve.  Eliminating native load exceptions -- ie,
treating all load equally -- and placing all transactions under the same
tariff may be an option that provides the right incentives for the provision
of transparent and standardized information.

Finally, Staff describes specific problems with TVA and FP&L, TVA is a
"problem area" for the Eastern Interconnect grid.  TVA is a transmission
bottleneck due to the many TLRs called this summer.  The current federal law
and lack of Commission jurisdiction are impediments to the development of
deep and robust power markets in this area.  TVA simply has no strong
incentive to provide effective and efficient transmission service.  In
addition, the Commission does not have full information on TVA.  Staff lists
a number of complaints against TVA, including unjustifiably increasing the
tag deadline and allowing TVA Marketing, but not others, to sink and park
power.  Staff concludes that recent proposals by TVA to enhance the
development of markets and its system do not appear to have great potential.

A Staff audit of FP&L revealed violations of standards of conduct, including
confidential information on FP&L's transmission system (including interchange
information for other entities) posted on EMS systems that were available to
FPL's merchant function.  Staff's report found that FP&L does not have an
established procedure for review of EMS to ensure that information is not
displayed in error.  It is "up to individual Managers discretion."  ((FRCC
web site report dated 9/8/00)).  Violations such as these undermine
competition.

The reports are attached below.

 - southeast.pdf
 - midwest.pdf


02/01/02 @ 08:35 a single pig was launched from Bloomfield Comp. Sta. @ 1145 psig and 865 mmcf/d rate.
09:43 pig past M.L. valve s108
10:10 Bisti Comp. Sta. taken down.
10:55 pig past Bisti Sta.
11:10 Bisti Comp. back on line.
11:54 pig past M.L. valve s110
13:50 pig received @ Gallup Comp. Sta. by some very competent techs. 752 psig approx. 1/2 gallon of yellow powder accompanied this pig. The suspicious powder was first thought to be an extremely rare strain of deadly yellow anthrax, but after further testing ( They made Wally taste it ), it was decided that it was just regular pipeline crud.
Thanks,
Chris
a.k.a. TheTeam Leader Supreme


>From: "Career News" <NEWSLETTER@ROUTE.MONSTER.COM>

>To: mcausholli@hotmail.com <MCAUSHOLLI@HOTMAIL.COM>

>Subject: Actual Jobs with Virtual Santas

>Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 3:11:05 -0500

>

>THE MONSTER.COM NEWSLETTER

>http://www.monster.com/

>

>To send feedback or unsubscribe, please scroll to the end of this

>newsletter. Do not use the "reply" button.

>

>----------------------------------------------------------------------

>IN THIS ISSUE:

>Week of November 26, 2001

>

>-- FEATURE: Actual Jobs with Virtual Santas

>-- THE MONSTER.COM POLL: Voice Your Opinion!

>-- JOB TIP OF THE WEEK: A Spoonful of Sugar Makes the Medicine Go Down

>-- FEATURE: The 10 Commandments of Temping

>-- HEARD ON THE BOARDS: Fired and Almost 50

>

>Switch your newsletter subscription to the HTML version here:

>http://forums.monster.com/switch.asp?m1=46&m2=1&u=20794906

>

>---------------------------advertisement------------------------------

>ResumeZapper

>

>1000's of Recruiters are waiting for your resume! Click Here to Email

>your Resume to 1000's of Recruiters with ResumeZapper

>

>http://r.monster.com/r.asp?112801_01_01

>

>----------------------------------------------------------------------

>FEATURE: Actual Jobs with Virtual Santas

>by John Rossheim

>

>The 2001 online holiday season is unlikely to spur the growth it has

>in previous years. As the economy worsens and consumers tighten their

>belts, online businesses adjust their staffing needs accordingly.

>Find out what this forecast means for your job search.

>http://retail.monster.com/articles/virtualsantas/

>

>----------------------------------------------------------------------

>DASHING THROUGH THE DOUGH

>

>Stuff your stocking with cash this holiday season. Search for a

>seasonal job on Monster!

>

>http://seasonal.monster.com

>

>----------------------------------------------------------------------

>THE MONSTER.COM POLL: Voice Your Opinion!

>

>Come to http://www.monster.com/ and cast your vote on the hottest

>issues, ranging from the world of work to current events to you. Let

>your voice be heard on Monster.com.

>

>----------------------------------------------------------------------

>JOB TIP OF THE WEEK: A Spoonful of Sugar Makes the Medicine Go Down

>by Marty Nemko

>

>Having a difficult time remembering to do important tasks? Marty

>Nemko, coauthor of "Cool Careers for Dummies," suggests solving that

>problem by linking your tasks to something pleasurable.

>http://content.monster.com/tipoftheweek/

>

>---------------------------advertisement------------------------------

>BISK/University Alliance

>

>ADVANCE YOUR CAREER! GET YOUR DEGREE/CERTIFICATE ONLINE!

>

>MBA degree holders earn 145% more, Bachelors 96% more! Get Your

>Accredited MBA, BA, AA degree or Project Management Certificate via

>the Internet from nationally known universities like VILLANOVA with

>NO CLASSROOM ATTENDANCE. Study anywhere, 24/7.

>

>http://r.monster.com/r.asp?112801_01_02

>

>----------------------------------------------------------------------

>MONSTER.COM'S SALES CAREERS CHAT

>

>Join The Accidental Salesperson and others to get career advice and

>sales tips Mondays at 1 p.m. ET in the Events room.

>

>http://my.monster.com/mchat.asp

>

>----------------------------------------------------------------------

>FEATURE: The 10 Commandments of Temping

>by Peter Vogt

>

>Your experiences as a temporary worker may feel like 40 years

>wandering in the desert, but these 10 tips on everything from

>self-promotion to continuous networking will lead you to the temping

>Promised Land.

>http://ct.monster.com/articles/temps/

>

>----------------------------------------------------------------------

>HEARD ON THE BOARDS: Fired and Almost 50

>

>Monster.com member SpanielMom posts: I just got fired from my Web

>development job, because the project I just finished was late. I'm

>nearly 50, and I've never been fired before. Now What?

>

>The Tech Jobs Expert responds: This happens to the best of us. You

>know what you're capable of, the quality of the work you perform and

>the ways employers have valued you in the past. Now you need to...

>

>Read the rest of The Tech Job Expert's response:

>http://forums.technology.monster.com/viewmessage.asp?messageid=1876388

>

>Ask The Tech Jobs Expert a question:

>http://forums.technology.monster.com/forum.asp?forum=111

>

>----------------------------------------------------------------------

>MONSTER.COM NEWSLETTERS

>

>Unsubscribe from this newsletter:

>http://my.monster.com/unsub.asp?m=46&u=20794906

>

>Subscribe to additional Monster.com newsletters:

>http://my.monster.com/newsletters.asp?mcausholli@hotmail.com

>Questions about using Monster.com: http://www.monster.com/contact/

>Post your resume: http://my.monster.com

>Advertise with us: mailto:AdOpps@monster.com (subject: sponsor)

>

>Send feedback: mailto:newsletter@monster.com

>

>----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Copyright 2001 TMP Interactive, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

>

>

>

Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com


Please shut down the above counterparty from trading all financial products.
They are no longer an ESP.


We had talked about doing a preliminary tile discussion on the weekend of
the 28th.  I need to know if Karen is still up for this.  Chris and Cristina
both want to go to the dome that weekend (can't go any other time and can't
go for memorial day because of her grandfathers big birthday).  I know Karen
doesn't like a big group and it might be bigger than she likes so you should
talk to her and find out.  Do you guys want to come to the dome that weekend
also?  I know Chris would like to dive with you, but I told him I didn't
know your plans...

Cameron Sellers
Vice President, Business Development
PERFECT
1860 Embarcadero Road - Suite 210
Palo Alto, CA 94303
cameron@perfect.com
650.798.3366 (direct dial)
650.269.3366 (cell)
650.858.1095 (fax)

-----Original Message-----
From:  Colleen Silva [mailto:Csilva@redsky.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 3:30 PM
To: 'Cameron Sellers'; 'Sean Maloney'; 'Scott Laughlin'; Colleen Silva;
psellers@pacbell.net; Jeff_Dasovich@enron.com; Prentice_W_Sellers@lecg.com
Subject: RE: COED SOFTBALL IS BACK!

hey can anyone give me karen's home and work #? i've some info to pass on to
her.... thanks!
-----Original Message-----
From: Cameron Sellers [mailto:cameron@perfect.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 12:12 PM
To: 'Sean Maloney'; 'Scott Laughlin'; Csilva@redsky.com;
psellers@pacbell.net; Jeff_Dasovich@enron.com;
Prentice_W_Sellers@lecg.com
Subject: RE: COED SOFTBALL IS BACK!

The Sheas can't play.  Chris hates softball and Cristina is PREGNANT!!

Cameron Sellers
Vice President, Business Development
PERFECT
1860 Embarcadero Road - Suite 210
Palo Alto, CA 94303
cameron@perfect.com
650.798.3366 (direct dial)
650.269.3366 (cell)
650.858.1095 (fax)

-----Original Message-----
From: Sean Maloney [mailto:skmaloney@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 11:17 AM
To: 'Scott Laughlin'; Csilva@redsky.com; psellers@pacbell.net;
cameron@perfect.com; Jeff_Dasovich@enron.com; Prentice_W_Sellers@lecg.com
Cc: 'Anderluh, Brian'; 'leezim@stanfordalumni.org';
'presidiosoftball@yahoo.com'
Subject: RE: COED SOFTBALL IS BACK!

Hey guys,

Glad to see you are interested.
Contact Lee or Brian to sign up a team.
They are copied on this e-mail and there numbers are below.

> >Lee Zimmerman (415 902 7194) and Brian Anderluh (415 609 4973)

See you soon.
Sean
-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Laughlin [SMTP:scottwl@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 11:01 AM
To: Csilva@redsky.com; psellers@pacbell.net; cameron@perfect.com;
Jeff_Dasovich@enron.com; Prentice_W_Sellers@lecg.com
Cc: skmaloney@yahoo.com
Subject: RE: COED SOFTBALL IS BACK!

Yeah, where are you Sean??

>From: Colleen Silva <Csilva@redsky.com>
>To: 'Prentice Sellers' <psellers@pacbell.net>, Cameron Sellers
><cameron@perfect.com>, 'Scott Laughlin' <scottwl@hotmail.com>, Colleen
>Silva <Csilva@redsky.com>, Jeff_Dasovich@enron.com,
>Prentice_W_Sellers@lecg.com
>CC: skmaloney@yahoo.com
>Subject: RE: COED SOFTBALL IS BACK!
>Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2001 10:31:38 -0700
>
>we need to respond today cuz all the spots are nearly already taken, is
>that
>right sean?
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Prentice Sellers [mailto:psellers@pacbell.net]
>Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 10:59 PM
>To: Cameron Sellers; 'Scott Laughlin'; Csilva@redsky.com;
>Jeff_Dasovich@enron.com; Prentice_W_Sellers@lecg.com
>Cc: skmaloney@yahoo.com
>Subject: RE: COED SOFTBALL IS BACK!
>
>
>I think you mean right field.  And catcher.  We'll need more than 9 people
>cause I'm sure there'll be times when people can't make it.  Don't want to
>have to forfiet just cause we don't have enough people.  What about the
>Sheas?
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Cameron Sellers [mailto:cameron@perfect.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 3:58 PM
>To: 'Scott Laughlin'; Csilva@redsky.com; Jeff_Dasovich@enron.com;
>Prentice_W_Sellers@lecg.com; psellers@pacbell.net
>Cc: skmaloney@yahoo.com
>Subject: RE: COED SOFTBALL IS BACK!
>
>
>I'm game, but I'm not good.  I can share left field with Colleen.
>
>
>Cameron Sellers
>Vice President, Business Development
>PERFECT
>1860 Embarcadero Road - Suite 210
>Palo Alto, CA 94303
>cameron@perfect.com
>650.798.3366 (direct dial)
>650.269.3366 (cell)
>650.858.1095 (fax)
>
>  -----Original Message-----
>From: Scott Laughlin [mailto:scottwl@hotmail.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 3:49 PM
>To: Csilva@redsky.com; Jeff_Dasovich@enron.com;
>Prentice_W_Sellers@lecg.com; psellers@pacbell.net; cameron@perfect.com
>Cc: skmaloney@yahoo.com
>Subject: RE: COED SOFTBALL IS BACK!
>
>This is really weird. While you guys were here exchanging e-mails about a
>possible softball team, we were in Mexico, where Eldon kept asking me, over
>tequilla masquerading as margaritas, if I thought Colleen needed any help
>with her swing...
>
>I'd be game for this. Can we get 9 people?
>
>
> >From: Colleen Silva <Csilva@redsky.com>
> >To: Colleen Silva <Csilva@redsky.com>, 'Jeff Dasovich'
> ><Jeff_Dasovich@enron.com>, "'Jeff_Dasovich@enron.com'"
> ><Jeff_Dasovich@enron.com>, "'Prentice_W_Sellers@lecg.com'"
> ><Prentice_W_Sellers@lecg.com>, 'Prentice Sellers' <psellers@pacbell.net>,
> >'Scott Laughlin' <scottwl@hotmail.com>, 'Cameron Sellers'
> ><cameron@perfect.com>
> >CC: 'Sean Maloney' <skmaloney@yahoo.com>
> >Subject: RE: COED SOFTBALL IS BACK!
> >Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 13:19:16 -0800
> >
> >can we please make a softball team and i promise to play back up left
>field
> >and not hold a majorly important position...... and i think we can even
> >talk
> >sean into cheating for us and calling things good for our team.... anyone
> >interested?
> >
> >and sean, willyou please send this to molly? (i don't have her email...)
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Sean Maloney [mailto:skmaloney@yahoo.com]
> >Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2001 8:40 AM
> >To: 'amorrison@eaminvest.com'; 'amy_e_parsons@hotmail.com'; 'Black,
> >Kirk'; 'boyden, mike'; 'Brad Zampa'; 'cameron@iwanto.com';
> >'bzampa@michaeloconnor.com'; 'Campbell, Laura Jean,M.D.'; 'Chad
> >Laurendeau'; 'Chanda Keefe'; 'Chuck Muller (E-mail)'; 'CKO'; 'Clahan,
> >Gena'; 'Clahan, Kevin'; 'Colleen Silva'; 'Costabile, Marina'; 'Dean
> >Holter (E-mail)'; 'deirdre polson'; 'Eddie Zalayet'; 'eisler, staci';
> >'Erik Sogge'; 'Evans, Ingrid'; 'Eugenia Clahan'; 'Francine Hunt'; Gia
> >Lawson; 'Glancy, Kerry'; 'Gurvey, Jennifer'; 'H_Newsom@plumpjack.com';
> >'Hawkins, Chris'; 'Heather Stein'; 'Hollenbeck, Chris'; 'Holter, Dean';
> >'Hyde, Amy'; 'Jason Fuchs'; 'Jeff Dasovich'; 'Jeff Sciaroni';
> >'Jeff_Dasovich@enron.com'; 'Jenckes, Lenlee'; 'John Horton';
> >'JRGoincmpg@aol.com'; 'Kate Ryan'; 'kerr, home'; 'Kramer, kirise';
> >'Laura Smith'; 'Leutwyler'; 'Louis on the road'; 'marlene burt';
> >'mattreis'; 'mboyden@portal.com'; 'Myers, Scott'; 'Nino-Murcia, Elisa';
> >'Pete Scott'; 'Pete Woodring'; 'Peter_Woodring@ustrust.com';
> >'PMAYCOCK@us.oracle.com'; 'Prentice_W_Sellers@lecg.com'; 'Prentice
> >Sellers'; 'Purdy, Tom'; 'Reis, Kimberlie'; 'Rochios, Matt'; 'sarmiento,
> >angela'; 'Scott Greenberg'; 'Scott Laughlin'; 'Sesos@aol.com'; 'Smith,
> >Derek'; 'Sogge, Eric'; 'St. Cin, Steve'; 'Sonsini, Pete'; 'Tovi,
> >Abello'; 'Tracy_Brown'; Trong Le; 'Trong Le'; 'Weisman, Will'; 'Weisman
> >work'
> >Cc: 'leezim@stanfordalumni.org'
> >Subject: FW: COED SOFTBALL IS BACK!
> >
> >
> >Hey Everyone,
> >
> >My two roommates are starting up a softball league.  The games will be at
> >Fort Scott (right by GG Bridge on SF side).  It should be a lot of fun.
> >  Details are below.  Please pass this on to anyone you know who might be
> >interested.
> >
> >Sean
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Lee Zimmerman [SMTP:leezim@stanfordalumni.org]
> >Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2001 5:58 PM
> >To: leezim@stanfordalumni.org
> >Subject: COED SOFTBALL IS BACK!
> >
> >Hi everyone,
> >
> >We are excited to announce that we are officially re-starting coed
>softball
> >at the Presidio Fort Scott Fields!  We have enjoyed
> >playing in the Fort Scott leagues for the past 4 years and are psyched to
> >get everyone back in action.
> >
> >We will have both spring and summer leagues.  In spring, leagues will be
> >played on Sunday nights (weeknights are booked with
> >school and rugby/lacrosse leagues).  In summer, leagues will be played on
> >weeknights (Monday through Thursday).  Priority for
> >summer leagues will be given to teams who play in the spring.
> >
> >We plan to start the spring leagues on April 15 so we need to move fast
>to
> >get teams signed up.
> >
> >Here are the details for this spring:
> >
> >- Games are Sunday nights from 6 -10 pm starting on April 15 and ending
>on
> >June 24 (with no games on May 6 or June 3)
> >- Each team will have 1 one-hour game per night
> >- Season includes 7 weeks of regular season games, plus single
>elimination
> >playoffs (meaning 1-3 more games)
> >- 10 people play in the field at a time (typically 6 men, 4 women)
> >- There will be two league levels - "recreational" and "competitive"
> >- Each league will have 8 teams (16 teams total)
> >- Cost is $550 per team (covers cost of fields, umps, insurance,
>equipment,
> >t-shirts, etc.)
> >
> >Please note we are accepting teams on a first-come, first-served basis,
>so
> >you should sign your team up ASAP.
> >
> >To secure a spot for your team, we ask you to do the following:
> >
> >(1) E-mail or call us expressing your interest (including league level
> >preference - recreational or competitive)
> >(2) Send us your payment via check
> >     - Make payments to Sandstorm Ventures, 10 UN Plaza,  Suite 630, San
> >Francisco, CA  94102
> >     - Please include your contact information with your payment
> >
> >After we receive your payment, we will call and confirm that you are in,
> >provide additional league details, get team name and
> >member info, etc...
> >
> >While we intend to keep things simple and un-bureaucratic, we will run
> >these leagues professionally, using experienced umps,
> >maximizing actual time of play, and making sure that everyone has a great
> >time.
> >
> >ALSO, WE ASK FOR YOUR HELP IN FORWARDING THIS E-MAIL TO OTHERS WHO MIGHT
>BE
> >INTERESTED IN PLAYING (including anyone who played in
> >the past) -- please copy us as well so we can get these folks on our
> >contact list.
> >
> >Feel free to call or e-mail us with any questions.
> >
> >We hope you are as excited as we are!
> >
> >Sincerely,
> >
> >Lee Zimmerman (415 902 7194) and Brian Anderluh (415 609 4973)
> >
> >
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com


Just throwing out some spots for Ken's BP......what do you think about Miami ???  Go'n to Miami,,,Miyamy yamy yamy!

Carson


Gary,

Stinson will contact you in the morning, Thu, regarding the trip.

Vince

	From:  Gary Hickerson                           11/30/2000 07:42 AM

To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul
Quilkey/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject:

Gentlemen,

 Spoke to Vince K today and asked if he would send Stinson Gibner to Sidney
to be available on Monday to review the X system.
Paul, make sure our X friends are available and the Confidentially Agreement
is signed.  Further, I spoke to Phillip B. about a technical going too.

G'day mates,

Gary


FYI,

I bot 30 lots/month of propane from Adam May-Sept at 51 cents, also I bot
30/month May -Sept Nat gas from Arnold, and a couple of contracts/mo of socal
basis to close the position out.  Please get the fill from arnold for gas,
and make sure it shows up in my position
report.  thanks.

Jeff


Michelle

Fortunately we have already received some advice on the effects of bankruptcy
on NOxTech from our patent counsel, which is attached. This is very promising
and appears to put us very much in control of the intellectual property.
Turning to the employment of the key individual, Bruce Sudduth, you will see
from the covering email that we might want to take some immediate steps to
preserve our ability to access him in the event bankruptcy is declared,
however I am not convinced on the limited amount of information that we would
not be running the risk of a tortious interference claim, unless we agreed it
with the directors of NOxTech first and then proposed it to Bruce. What do
you think?

Marcus
---------------------- Forwarded by Marcus Nettelton/NA/Enron on 11/29/2000
08:41 AM ---------------------------

"Maher, David" <DMaher@mdbe.com> on 11/28/2000 03:27:11 PM
To: "'marcus.nettelton@enron.com'" <marcus.nettelton@enron.com>
cc: "Bates, William" <wbates@mdbe.com>, "Deamer, Bart" <BDeamer@mdbe.com>

Subject: FW: Licenosor's Bankruptcy Issues & Agenda for Tomorrow

Marcus,
In case you had not seen this yet, attached is a memorandum we had prepared
at Bart Clark's request anticipating NOxTech's possible bankruptcy.  I have
forwarded your contact information to Bill Bates, and he should be calling
you tomorrow.

Best regards,
Dave

>  -----Original Message-----
> From:  Miller, Gilman
> Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2000 7:17 PM
> To: 'Barton Clark'
> Cc: Mastroianni, Ron; Michelson, Randy; Maher, David; Evans, Hank
> Subject: Licenosor's Bankruptcy Issues & Agenda for Tomorrow
>
> Bart - The attached memo summarizes Enron's rights in various scenarios
> involving NOxTech filing for bankruptcy.  The memo is self-explanatory and
> in discussing it with Ron and Randy they did not have any drafting advice
> that would alter the outcomes set forth in the memo.
>
> However, the suggestion was made that a term-of-years (as opposed to an
> at-will) consulting contract could be entered into between Bruce Sudduth
> and Enron providing that Enron would pay Bruce Sudduth a specified amount
> per hour (and perhaps even a small amount up front) in exchange for his
> agreeing to provide Enron with technical assistance on an as-needed basis.
> Such an agreement could not spring into effect upon a bankruptcy event (or
> it would be subject to the same analysis in the attached memo whereby
> specific performance could not be compelled).  Similarly, it should not be
> referenced in the Transaction Documents (much less be a condition to
> closing).  Instead it might simply run for a two-year period starting upon
> its execution presumably next month.
>
> If such a contract is something that you would like to pursue we could get
> an employment attorney working on drafting such an agreement.
>
> ----
>
> With respect to tomorrow's call at 8 a.m. our time (10 a.m. your time).
> As I mentioned in my voice message, if we still have not seen anything
> from LeBoeuf with respect to the other Transaction Documents then you
> should simply call David Maher (650-849-4908) at that time to discuss the
> License Agreement as he will be turning that agreement.
>
> If you leave me a voice message (415-393-2520) indicating that any other
> comments have arrived from LeBoeuf overnight or earlier that morning then
> I will still come in by 8 a.m. to begin reviewing such comments in
> preparation for discussing them with you after your License Agreement
> discussion concludes.  Of course, if we have not received any comments
> from LeBoeuf by that time then we will not be able to turn the other
> Transaction Documents in time for a Noon p.s.t. signing by NOxTech.
>
> Thanks,
> Gilman Miller
> McCutchen, Doyle, Brown & Enersen
> Three Embarcadero Center, 18th Floor
> San Francisco, California  94111
> T - (415) 393-2520
> F - (415) 393-2286
>
>
>  <<21255682.DOC>>

E-MAIL NOTICE

This e-mail message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and/or privileged information. Any review, use,
disclosure or distribution by persons or entities other than the intended
recipient(s) is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please
contact the sender by reply and destroy all copies of the original message.
Thank you.

To reply to our E-mail Administrator directly, send an email to
Postmaster@mdbe.com or call (415) 393-2000 and delete this email.

McCUTCHEN, DOYLE, BROWN & ENERSEN, LLP

http://www.mccutchen.com

 - 21255682.DOC


---------------------- Forwarded by Elizabeth Linnell/NA/Enron on 08/18/2000
06:06 PM ---------------------------

Margaret Carson
08/18/2000 05:32 PM
To: Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron, Elizabeth Linnell/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: 4 SLIDES FOR STEVE TO CONSIDER FOR HIS TEXAS TESTIMONY ON TUESDAY

I  am  sending you both an info  copy of the  slides  I  put together  in
response to Steve's  request today .There
is one more  slide  on electric prices  I am still developing.....   Margaret
---------------------- Forwarded by Margaret Carson/Corp/Enron on 08/18/2000
05:21 PM ---------------------------
From: Simon Shih on 08/18/2000 04:59 PM
To: Margaret Carson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject:


Dear Inside UT Football newsletter subscriber:

There's still plenty of football to be played, and we're sure you
have lots of questions about the Longhorns. Remember, Chip Brown's
Inside UT Football newsletter is based on your questions. Send yours
to Chip here: mailto:chipbrown@dallasnews.com

And don't forget to tell a friend about this free service. New
subscribers may sign up here: http://newsletters.belointeractive.com

Enjoy the rest of the season!


Looky at what I just opened in my email.  I had some stuff tucked away in a different directory and I'm going thru it now.  Does this still need to be addressed?

Darla Saucier@ENRON
03/01/2001 05:14 PM
To:	Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:	10/2000 Production - New Power

Hey Chris,

Does this amount look correct to you??  Do we actually owe New Power $5MM ?  they haven't mentioned it to me, but it's showing up as a balance due to them.  could you please verify ASAP?

Thanks!


Any GCP adjustments will be highlighted in red.

Rgds.

Samuel x3-9890
Enron Net Works _ GCP

From: Walter Guidroz/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/27/2001 03:17 PM
To: Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel
Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/ENRON@enronXgate,
Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli
Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate, Cynthia Clark/ENRON@enronXgate, Enron Europe
Global Contracts and Facilities@ENRON, Enron Europe Global
CounterParty/LON/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom
Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Claudia Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S
Bradford/ENRON@enronXgate, Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Juana
Fayett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jana Morse/Corp/Enron@Enron, Trang Le/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Paul Maley/LON/ECT@ECT, Sonya Clarke/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim Davies/LON/ECT@ECT,
Karen O'Day/NA/Enron@Enron, Tanya Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Kelly
Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron, Brian Lindsay/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, EOL Call Center@ENRON, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill D
Hare/HOU/ECT@ect, Amy Heffernan/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Molly LaFuze/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Danny Clark/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications
cc:
Subject: EOL approvals, 03-27-01

Please see attached.


Marlo,

Can you please forward that email you sent me to Patti Sullivan since I have
not used the path manager and my mail forward feature is not working.  Thanks.

Mat


----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 10/02/2000 09:07 AM -----

	"Susan Hopkinson" <susan.hopkinson@lovells.com>
	09/12/2000 04:31 AM

		 To: <Sara.Shackleton@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: ISDA Master Agreement between Enron North America Corp. and
SociieteIndustrielle de Transports Automobile S.A.

CONFIDENTIALITY This e-mail and any attachments are confidential
and may also be privileged. If you are not the named recipient,
please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the
contents to another person, use it for any purpose, or store
or copy the information in any medium.
----------------------------------------------------------------

Sharon Lewis asked me to contact you about this.  Our client has instructed
us that it is SITA which will enter into the ISDA master agreement.  SITA as
the main company must have a better credit than the company that you
identified.

We cannot agree to a credit support document.

We suggest that you evaluate the credit of SITA and then get back to us.

Kind regards
Susan

>>> <Sara.Shackleton@enron.com> 9/11/2000 20:28:17 >>>
Sharon:  Thanks for your fax and markup of the Schedule dated Sept. 6.
There is a major issue which we need to discuss and that is the
counterparty identity itself.  It appears that you have identified a
DIFFERENT party to the agreement, namely, a limited liability company named
"SITA", which is not the entity which we originally proposed,.  This does
not appear to be the credit which we evaluated.

Also, we insist upon a Credit Support Annex.  As you know, the agreement
contemplates multiple transactions and the posting of collateral is a major
issue, particularly for long-dated pulp deals.

Can you call me tomorrow?  We need to address the major issues upfront.
You can reach me at 713-853-5620.  Thank you.  Sara

----------------------------------------------------------------
Lovells (the merged firm of Lovell White Durrant and
Boesebeck Droste, practising as Lovells Boesebeck Droste in
some jurisdictions) is an international law firm.

In the event of any technical difficulty with this email, please contact
the sender or the London Technology Department on +44 (0) 20 7296 2000.


Hi Tana,

Here is the email address for Jack Cogen at NatSource. If possible they would
like to receive the documents electronically. Its jcogen@natsource.com. Once
again if we could get the CA to them as soon as possible. Thanks.

Savita


This looks like a great opportunity for us.  Jeff
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 10/04/2000
05:54 PM ---------------------------

Kristin Gandy@ENRON
10/04/2000 02:14 PM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Wharton Entrepreneurship Conference Info.

Do you want to participate in this event?

Kristin
---------------------- Forwarded by Kristin Gandy/NA/Enron on 10/04/2000
02:08 AM ---------------------------

Cassandra Santos <csantos@alum.mit.edu> on 09/29/2000 01:04:21 PM
To: Celeste.Roberts@enron.com
cc: Kristin.Gandy@enron.com

Subject: Wharton Entrepreneurship Conference Info.

Dear Celeste and Kristin:

I am re-sending information regarding the Wharton Entrepreneurship
Conference and the opportunities to sponsor the conference as well as
participate in the Expo.  We are expecting the conference to double in
size with more than 1000 attendees.  In addition, we would like to
emphasize that the spirit of entrepreneurship is alive and well outside
of the "dot.com" world including in large, innovative companies such as
Enron.  We have already lined up some smash hit speakers including
Christy Jones of Trilogy and PCOrder as well as Anita Roddick of The
Body Shop.  We would be very interested to have the participation of
Enron in the conferences as a sponsor or at the very least, a
participant in our career expo.

Thank you very much for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,
Cassandra Santos
Co-Chair, Wharton Entrepreneurship Conference
215.732.7940 H
215.498.3243 W

 - Resend Enron.doc
 - Fundraising Packet 2000.doc


Hi All!
Just a quick update to let you know that we received Occupancy Permits from
the City of Portland for the 6th floor at The Roosevelt May 30th at around
4pm.
We are now conducting Final Walk thru's for 6th floor and you will be
contacted by Sarah Capps soon for your personal walk thru appointment. We
appreciate your patience!

If you have any additional questions, please give us a call or an email!

Kirstin Boettcher for Jeff Burghart P.C.
The Hasson Company Realtors
503-735-4884
kb@pointclicklive.net

Many of you have called for Chicago Title Contact information:

Chicago Title
Micki Swenson
Molly Kearney Assistant to Micki Swenson
503-973-7500


Joe any answer from the broker on getting those quotes

thanks

sean

-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
Sean Doherty
wk 212 773 8195
fax 212 773 5481
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*

----- Forwarded by Sean Doherty/NewYork/AUDIT/EYLLP/US on 02/28/2002 02:39
PM -----

                    Sean Doherty
                                         To:     joe.parks@enron.com
                    02/27/2002           cc:
                    10:57 AM             Subject:     Peoples curve

As discussed I am resending yesterday's email,  You have already sent me
the basis spreads and anything you could get on the indices would be
helpful

thanks

sean

-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
Sean Doherty
wk 212 773 8195
fax 212 773 5481
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*

__________________

all curves are for physical deals as of 2/13

 basis curves :

CHI/N/BORDER
NGI/CHIGATE

Index

Peoples

NGI/CHI/PEOPLE
CHI/N/BORDER

NORTH SHORE

NGI/CHI/WILLCO
NGI/CHIGATE

I realize it may be difficult to get each of these but anything you could
get would be appreciated.

thanks

Sean

-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
Sean Doherty
wk 212 773 8195
fax 212 773 5481
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*

______________________________________________________________________
The information contained in this message may be privileged and
confidential and protected from disclosure.  If the reader of this message
is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for
delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,
please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it
from your computer.  Thank you.  Ernst & Young LLP


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 01/04/2001 05:48 PM -----

	Bradley Diebner
	01/04/2001 05:44 PM

		 To: Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel
Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie
R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Cynthia Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary G Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Enron Europe
Global Contracts and Facilities, Enron Europe Global CounterParty, Stephanie
Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bradley Diebner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey
Richardson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Adnan Patel/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Claudia Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa
Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Juana Fayett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jana Morse/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Trang Le/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Maley/LON/ECT@ECT, Sonya Clarke/LON/ECT@ECT, Lee
Munden/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim Davies/LON/ECT@ECT, Karen O'Day/NA/Enron@Enron, Tanya
Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Walter Guidroz/NA/Enron@Enron, Kelly
Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: EOL Approvals, 1/4/01


Ben,

Attached file has financial and S&P.