It is becoming increasingly clear that the development of eCommerce will have
a significant and continuing impact on the conduct of business in a broad
array of industries.  Through EnronOnLine, Enron has quickly become a major
catalyst for the transition to the web in the gas and electric industries.
EnronOnLine has been an enormous success since its launch.  Since launch, we
have completed 67,043 transactions on line, with a total dollar value of over
$25 billion.  EnronOnLine is now the largest eCommerce site in the world.

We believe that the competitive success of EnronOnLine is due to one very
specific reason.  In addition to providing a web-based platform for
transactions, Enron acts as principal to provide direct liquidity to the
site.  We stand ready at all times, in any market conditions, to buy and sell
at the posted price.  This converts a &bulletin board8 (the more typical
eCommerce concept) into a true market.  There are very few, if any,
competitors that can provide this capability.

We are increasingly convinced that this competitive advantage can be
dramatically expanded to other products and other geographies.  If we are
correct, this could provide an enormous new opportunity for growth for Enron.

Accordingly, we are initiating a major new effort to capture this
opportunity.  Effective today we are creating a new business, Enron Net
Works, to pursue new market development opportunities in eCommerce across a
broad range of industries.  It is likely that this business will ultimately
be our fifth business segment, joining transmission & distribution,
wholesale, retail and broadband services.

Included in this business will be our entire IT and technology group along
with significant talent and resources in market making and finance.
Initially, North America will provide primary direct support for staff
services and back office, however, over time we will be requesting support
services from virtually all Enron units to ensure continued growth and
success.  To facilitate the combining of commercial capabilities with these
new eCommerce platforms, Enron Net Works will work closely with the merchant
functions of North America, Europe, South America, CALME, Asia and Broadband.

Enron Net Works will be headed by Greg Whalley, Chief Executive Officer; Mike
McConnell, Chief Operating Officer; and Jeff McMahon, Chief Commercial
Officer.  These individuals will comprise the Office of the Chairman for
Enron Net Works and remain on the Executive Committee of Enron Corp.
Replacing Greg Whalley as President and Chief Operating Officer of Enron
North America is Dave Delainey, who will also join Enron,s Executive
Committee.

Global Technology will remain intact but will now be a part of Enron Net
Works.  It will maintain all of the same businesses and services as it did as
an Enron global function.  Philippe Bibi will remain the Chief Technology
Officer for all of Enron Corp. and continues to be responsible for the
development of worldwide technology standards and platforms.

EnronOnLine, headed by Louise Kitchen, will also remain intact and will now
be a part of Enron Net Works.  The success of EnronOnLine enables us to
utilize this site as a model as we explore other markets. In addition, the
following individuals are included in Enron Net Works along with their
current eCommerce initiatives: Harry Arora, Public Financial Securities; Jay
Fitzgerald, New Markets Identification; Bruce Garner, Metals; and Greg Piper,
Pulp and Paper.

Over the next several weeks we will complete staffing and organizational
design and will provide full details on this exciting new business
opportunity.


Kyle Smith
739 Saint Louis Ave Apt 4
Long Beach, CA 90804
SoKalKyle@Hotmail.com

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

Kyle Smith


To be rescheduled per MH
Carolyn George made reservations - x. 3-3439


You know I just can't remember that far in advance!


Sarah:
Can you create a spreadsheet summarizing Enron's open futures interest broken
down by commodity and broker, including maintenance and initial margin for
all commodities (including rates, currencies, gas, crude, etc).
Also, can you create a list of all margin financing agreements in place and
the rates we pay.
Thanks,
John


---------------------- Forwarded by Kevin G Moore/HOU/ECT on 04/03/2001 06:24
AM ---------------------------

Tony Hamilton@ENRON
04/03/2001 05:16 AM
To: Kevin G Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Check and Car Hire

Kevin

My wife checked with our bank - it will take up to 10 days for the $2000
check to clear.

I checked with Enterprise (the car hire people) last night and the total bill
will be about $1251  - I don't have this much left on my credit card, help!

I am really sorry about the hassle this is causing you, but I need some way
for Enron to pay directly for the car, that way I won't need the $2000 check.

Many thanks for your help

Tony


---------------------- Forwarded by Joyce Dorsey/HOU/ECT on 06/12/2000 09:26
AM ---------------------------

Clint Freeland@ENRON
06/12/2000 08:40 AM
To: Joyce Dorsey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Gareth Bahlmann/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Enron PATS 2000-1: Revised Documents

Joyce -
Would you please forward this to the Sterling PAT team.  Thank you.
CF
---------------------- Forwarded by Clint Freeland/Corp/Enron on 06/12/2000
08:24 AM ---------------------------

mukunah@winstim.com on 06/09/2000 09:56:13 PM
To: clint.freeland@enron.com, gareth.bahlmann@enron.com,
kimberly.blue@ubsw.com, scott.whitney@ubsw.com, ryan.donovan@ubsw.com,
scott.giese@ubsw.com, timothy.steele@ubsw.com, michael.davidson@ubsw.com,
william.sullivan@ubsw.com, john.magovern@ubsw.com, raustin@houston.rr.com,
mspradling@velaw.com, sara.shackleton@enron.com, who@velaw.com,
gorloff@bracepatt.com, ktrautner@bracepatt.com, Rastin@velaw.com,
ttabor@bankofny.com, kurzw@winstim.com, bergeronc@winstim.com,
david.mikula@ubsw.com, bvascon@enron.com, atiller@enron.com, jlynch@velaw.com
cc: ecklandt@winstim.com, delaneyj@winstim.com, chudyj@winstim.com,
earlyhud@winstim.com

Subject: Enron PATS 2000-1: Revised Documents

In connection with Enron's PATS offering, we're attaching a Cover Letter and
clean and marked drafts of the Purchase Agreement, Remarketing Agreement,
Trust
Agreement  and Confirmations relating to the swaps and options.

Best regards,

Hazel Mukuna

(See attached file: Cover Letter.doc)

(See attached file: Purchase Agreement.doc)        (See attached file:
Purchase
Agreement REDLINE.doc)

(See attached file: Remarketing Agreement.doc)     (See attached file:
Remarketing Agreement.REDLINE.doc)

(See attached file: Trust Agreement.doc)           (See attached file: Trust
Agreement.REDLINE.doc)

(See attached file: Swap 1 - UBS and Trust.doc)    (See attached file: Swap 1
-
UBS and Trust.REDLINE.doc)

(See attached file: Swap 2 - Enron - UBS.doc)      (See attached file: Swap 2
-
Enron - UBS.REDLINE.doc)

(See attached file: Swap 3 - Enron - UBS.doc)      (See attached file: Swap 3
-
Enron - UBS.REDLINE.doc)

(See attached file: Option 1 - UBS and Trust.doc)  (See attached file: Call
Option 1 - UBS and Trust.REDLINE.doc)

(See attached file: Option 2 - Enron and UBS.doc)  (See attached file: Option
2
- Enron and UBS.REDLINE.doc)

______________________________________
This message, together with any attachments, is intended only for the
use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain
information that is legally privileged, confidential and exempt from
disclosure.  If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this
message,or any attachment, is strictly prohibited.  If you have received
this message in error, please notify the original sender (or the WSPR
Help Desk) immediately by telephone (212-858-1000) or by return
E-mail and delete the message, along with any attachments, from
your computer.  Thank you.

 - Cover Letter.doc
 - Purchase Agreement.doc
 - Purchase Agreement REDLINE.doc
 - Remarketing Agreement.doc
 - Remarketing Agreement.REDLINE.doc
 - Trust Agreement.doc
 - Trust Agreement.REDLINE.doc
 - Swap 1 - UBS and Trust.doc
 - Swap 1 - UBS and Trust.REDLINE.doc
 - Swap 2 - Enron - UBS.doc
 - Swap 2 - Enron - UBS.REDLINE.doc
 - Swap 3 - Enron - UBS.doc
 - Swap 3 - Enron - UBS.REDLINE.doc
 - Option 1 - UBS and Trust.doc
 - Call Option 1 - UBS and Trust.REDLINE.doc
 - Option 2 - Enron and UBS.doc
 - Option 2 - Enron and UBS.REDLINE.doc


<<Enron_AustinEnergy_Summary of Contract Terms-112800.doc>>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Johnson, Lee L (PS, SSEP)
> Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 3:29 PM
> To: 'kay.mann@enron.com'
> Cc: Shoemaker, Kent (GEAE)
> Subject: Exhibits for Austin and LV Cogen Facility Agreements
>
>  << File: Exhibits to Gas Turbine Purchase Agreement - LV Cogen
> redline_120400.DOC >>
>
>  << File: Exhibits to Gas Turbine Purchase Agreement - Austin redline _
> 120400.DOC >>

 - Enron_AustinEnergy_Summary of Contract Terms-112800.doc


F R I D A Y   E X T R E M E   M A R K E T S
A complimentary service from INO.com ( http://www.ino.com/ )

Friday: The CRB Index has advanced 1.71 points to 210.71. The
US Dollar Index edged higher by 0.01 points to 119.08.

The Dow Industrials gained 78.47 points, at 10990.41, while
the S&P 500 rose 4.85 points, last seen at 1260.67. The
Nasdaq Composite moved higher by 38.95 points to 2149.44.

   FREE Complete Copy: "Charting Made Easy" by John Murphy.
   An essential read and incredible offer!!
   http://www.ino.com/specials/infinity/
_____________________________________________________________________

Shocking Manual Loaded with Serious Money Strategies
_____________________________________________________________________

It's Like Having A Guaranteed Income For Life!!!
http://store.ino.com/sale/1A433/TWOV-Visually

Dear Andrew:

Just one of these automatic methods . . . JUST ONE
. . . is enough for you to make a career trading
options professionally.

YES, these are the exact techniques used by all
professionals to get rich trading options!

Like the former real estate broker who made over
$800,000 in just three months
- without a single loss!

Like the caddy who borrowed a small grubstake
and made over $100,000 per month for
70 consecutive months!

Or the former Bear's linebacker who's made
$16,634,699 in just three years!

These are all actual results achieved by options traders
 . . . starting with the very same secrets you'll have
after reading Paul Forchione's exciting manual,
"Trading Options Visually."

FREE 11 PAGE BROCHURE AT:
http://store.ino.com/sale/1A433/TWOV-Visually

Click for Safety First Strategies!

Order Toll Free 800-538-7424 - 410-867-7424

All claims on third-party products are made by the publisher
and not by INO.com. All Products Guaranteed.

_____________________________________________________________________

E X T R E M E   M A R K E T   C O M M E N T A R Y
_____________________________________________________________________

The STOCK INDEXES closed higher on Friday due to a rebound in
technology stocks. The Nasdaq extended its rebound off Wednesday's
low but failed to fill this week's gap crossing at 2170.58 thereby
leaving the door open for sideways to lower prices during the first
half of June. Momentum indicators also remain bearish indicating that
the late week rebound in both indexes appears to be nothing more than
light short covering ahead of the weekend. If the declines resume
next week, May's reaction lows are potential targets.

The Dow posted a key reversal up due to a rebound in blue chip
stocks. Intel continued to pace the gainers among the Dow's
components up 5.3%. The Dow's other three technology components were
also higher on the day. Additional gains on Monday are needed to
confirm today's bullish reversal pattern, which would then strongly
suggest that the setback off May's high might have come to an end.

INTEREST RATES September bonds closed sharply higher on Friday and
above this spring's downtrend line crossing near 100-26 thereby
signaling that a short-term bottom has been posted. I would not be
surprised to see a modest setback on Monday as September might try
and consolidate some of this week's gains. Early weakness was tied to
the above-consensus May employment report. However, today's National
Association of Purchasing Management's data, which continues to show
weakness in manufacturing triggered a rally into the close. Momentum
indicators have turned bullish signaling that sideways to higher
prices into early-June are possible.

The CRB INDEX closed higher on Friday due to strength in grains,
meats, precious metals, foods and fiber. The CRB ended the week above
April's low crossing at 208.87 and may have marked a double bottom
this week. Momentum indicators are bearish but oversold hinting that
a short-term bottom might be in or near. Closes below this week's low
would confirm a breakout below this spring's trading range while
opening the door for a larger-degree decline into June.

ENERGY MARKETS were mostly lower on Friday as Iraq indicate that it
would continue oil exports this month under prior contracts, despite
its rejection of a one-month extension of the oil-for-food deal.

July crude oil posted an inside day with a lower close on Friday with
session lows falling short of testing the 50% retracement level of
the December/May rally crossing at 27.51. Momentum indicators are
bearish signaling that additional weakness near-term is possible. If
the decline continues, the late-April reaction low crossing at 27.25
is July's next target.

July heating oil posted an inside day with a lower close and a
breakout below the 38% retracement level of the December/May rally
crossing at 75.66. If the decline continues, May's reaction low
crossing at 74.55, which coincides with the 50% retracement level of
this spring's rally is July's next target. Momentum indicators remain
bearish signaling that sideways to lower prices into early- June are
possible.

July unleaded gas posted a downside reversal on Friday after early
strength tied to spillover short covering from Thursday's high-range
close faded in afternoon trading. Momentum indicators remain bearish
signaling that sideways to lower prices into next week are possible.
However, ongoing concerns over summer gasoline supplies are likely to
limit downside risk in the market.

July Henry Hub natural gas posted a quiet inside day with a slightly
higher close on Friday as it consolidates above last October's low
crossing at 3.86. Closes below this key support level would open the
door for a possible test of the 62% retracement level of the 1999-01
rally crossing at 3.64 later this spring. The daily ADX (a
trend-following indicator) is bearish however, momentum indicators
are oversold hinting that a pause in this spring's decline is
possible.

CURRENCIES The September Dollar closed lower on Friday due to light
profit taking ahead of the weekend. The mid-range close leaves the
door open for sideways to higher prices on Monday as the door has
been opened for additional gains during the first half of June. If
this week's rally continues, weekly resistance that crosses at
121.58, which marks the 50% retracement level of the 1985/1992
decline is September's next target later this spring. The daily ADX
(a trend-following indicator) is bullish signaling that additional
weakness is possible.

The September Swiss Franc posted a quiet inside day with a higher
close on Friday as it consolidated below broken support crossing at
.5643. If the decline continues, a test of weekly support crossing at
.5508 is possible later this month. The daily ADX (a trend-following
indicator) signals that additional weakness is possible.

The September Canadian Dollar closed higher on Friday and is poised
to test this spring's high crossing at .6541. Multiple closes above
this resistance level are needed to renew this spring's rally.
Momentum indicators are bullish signaling that additional gains early
next week are possible.

The September Japanese Yen closed higher on Friday but near session
lows due to light short covering ahead of the close. Nevertheless,
this week's rally has confirmed a breakout above this spring's
trading range crossing at .8425 thereby opening the door for
additional gains into early-June. Momentum indicators are bullish
signaling that additional gains next week are possible.

PRECIOUS METALS August gold closed higher on Friday due to light
short covering ahead of the weekend. Nevertheless, August has broken
out below April's uptrend line thereby opening the door for a test of
this spring's low crossing at 257.30 later this month. Stochastics
and RSI remain bearish signaling that additional weakness is possible
next week.

July silver also closed higher on Friday due to light short covering
ahead of the weekend. While today's mid-range close leaves the door
open for sideways trading on Monday, momentum indicators remain
bearish signaling that additional weakness during the first half of
June is possible. If the decline continues, May's low at 4.315 is a
target.

July copper ended the week on a low note while posting an inside day.
Momentum indicators remain bearish signaling that a test of May's low
at 74.75 is likely next week. Multiple closes below this support
level would confirm a breakout below this spring's trading range
thereby opening the door for a test of weekly support crossing at
74.10 later this month.

GRAINS July corn gapped above May's downtrend line and closed higher
on Friday due to massive fund short covering. While today's export
sales report of 30 million bushels was below expectations, rising
concerns over slow crop development due to cool/wet weather are
gaining attention by the market. With funds holding a huge short
position in the market, any additional bullish news will only lead to
additional short covering. I would not be surprised to see some
consolidation on Monday as traders wait for the latest planting
progress and crop conditions reports before taking additional profits
on their short positions. Today's rally turned the ADX down, which is
often associated with a market that is bottoming. From a broader
perspective, the corn market has posted a key reversal on the weekly
chart. Additional gains next week are needed to confirm this
potentially bullish reversal pattern.

July wheat also gapped up and closed higher on Friday following this
week's bullish export sales report, which showed over 18 million
bushels in new crop sales. Additional support came from increased
concerns over disease problems with the Kansas winter wheat crop.
Session highs tested May's downtrend line crossing at 2.72. Closes
above this resistance level would open the door for a larger-degree
rebound during June. Momentum indicators have also turned bullish
signaling that sideways to higher prices near-term are possible.

SOYBEAN COMPLEX July soybeans gapped above last week's high crossing
at 4.53 1/2 and closed higher on Friday due to fund short covering.
Increased concerns over the cool/wet weather, which has enveloped
much of the Midwest thereby raising concerns over emergence and
planting progress has underpinned this week's rally. Profit taking
ahead of the close could lead to further consolidation on Monday.
However, weekly momentum indicators have turned bullish signaling
that sideways to higher prices during June are possible. If the rally
continues, March's high crossing at 4.77 3/4 is July's next target.

July soybean meal closed lower on Friday despite this week's stellar
export sales report of some 257,000 metric tonnes, which was well
above pre-report estimates. Bulls should note today's downside
reversal, as the market has not responded well to friendly news. This
suggests that most of if not all of the bullish demand news might
have already been factored into prices. Stochastics and RSI have
turned bearish signaling that sideways to lower prices on Monday are
possible. It will take closes above 168 to renew this spring's rally.

LIVESTOCK August hogs closed sharply higher for the fourth day in a
row filling April's gap crossing at 64.90. The stage is set for
additional gains and a likely test of April's high crossing at 65.95
later this month. This week's rally underpinned by fund buying is due
in part to futures discount to the cash market and ideas that loin
prices should bottom next week. Momentum indicators are bullish
signaling that sideways to higher prices into early-June are
possible.

August cattle closed out the week on a high note as the stage is set
for a test of January's high crossing at 75.00 next week. The
discount of futures to the cash market along with higher cash bids
this week continues to underpin August's rally. Momentum indicators
are bullish but have become overbought warning traders to use caution
as a top may be near.

FOOD & FIBER July coffee closed higher on Friday due to light short
covering ahead of the weekend. However, a sell off ahead of the close
tempered much of today's early gains leaving the door open for
sideways to lower prices next week. This week's breakout into new
contract lows has opened the door for a test of long-term support
crossing at 51.70 later this month.

July cocoa closed higher on Friday due to light short covering
following Thursday's breakout below trading range support crossing at
955. Momentum indicators remain bearish despite their oversold
condition hinting that additional weakness into early-June is
possible. If the decline continues, the 75% retracement level at 862
is July's next target.

July sugar closed higher on Friday due to light short covering as it
consolidates around the 38% retracement level of this spring's rally
crossing at 857. Momentum indicators remain bearish signaling that
sideways to lower prices next week is still possible. If the decline
continues, fib support crossing at 832 then 808 are targets.

July cotton extended this week's short covering rally as it
consolidates above psychological support crossing at 40- cents. Light
support came from today's export sales report that came in at 107,300
bales. Additional support came from news of some 300,000 to 350,000
acres of west Texas cotton being destroyed by flooding. However,
upside potential remains limited due to this year's burdensome
carryout levels, which are expected to grow in the coming year.

Daily Extreme Commentary is brought to you by GLOBALcharts,
INO.com's end-of-day charting software for Futures, Futures
Options and Optionable Stocks. http://www.globalcharts.com
Search the INO Store  - http://store.ino.com/
_____________________________________________________________________

T O P   N E W S
_____________________________________________________________________

STOCKS

Japan Stocks Review: Nikkei ends almost flat despite US gains
   http://news.ino.com/summary/?id=25622
Add2: US Equities Review: Higher on late buying despite weak NAPM
   http://news.ino.com/summary/?id=25620
UK Stocks Review: Defensive stocks boost FTSE-100's small rally
   http://news.ino.com/summary/?id=25628

FOREX

US FX Review: Euro steepens losses despite weak US NAPM
   http://news.ino.com/summary/?id=25624
Asia FX Review: Yen rises as intervention fears recede further
   http://news.ino.com/summary/?id=25621
Europe FX Review: Weak US NAPM figure gives euro a reprieve
   http://news.ino.com/summary/?id=25623

CREDIT

US Credit Review: Long end gains on weak manufacturing data
   http://news.ino.com/summary/?id=25619
Europe Credit Review: Evidence of economic weakness supports mkt
   http://news.ino.com/summary/?id=25625
Japan Credit Review: June dips slightly on profit-taking
   http://news.ino.com/summary/?id=25627

COMMODITIES

US Futures Summary: Grains up on weather; 2-month gasoline low
   http://news.ino.com/summary/?id=25626

EXCHANGES

CME May Volume Up 60% As Open Interest Tops 13 Million
   http://news.ino.com/press/?release=24507
iShares ETF Sets Single-Day Volume Record On CBOE
   http://news.ino.com/press/?release=24506
Minneapolis OK's Cash-Settled Corn And Soybean Futures
   http://news.ino.com/press/?release=24505
Euro Energy Exchange Records 1.64 Terawatt Hours In May
   http://news.ino.com/press/?release=24504
Eurex Trades 53.8 Million Contracts In May, Third Highest
   http://news.ino.com/press/?release=24503
May German Stock Volume Totals 386 Billion Euros
   http://news.ino.com/press/?release=24502

____________________________________________________________________________

E X T R E M E   F U T U R E S
____________________________________________________________________________

Updated every 10 minutes around the clock.
More at http://quotes.ino.com/analysis/extremes/futures/

WINNERS

LBF2   Random Length Lumber Jan 2002              303.00     10.00  +3.41
CU1    Corn Sep 2001                             206 3/4     6 1/4  +3.12
XCU1   Corn Sep 2001                             206 3/4     5 3/4  +2.87
NDM1   NASDAQ 100 Index Jun 2001                 1851.50     49.00  +2.72
ZM1    U.S. Treasury 6% Bond Jun 2001          103 184/256   2 23/32  +2.69
CCK2   Cocoa May 2002                                992        23  +2.37
BOV1   Soybean Oil Oct 2001                        15.78      0.35  +2.27
XRN1   Soybean Oil Jul 2001                        15.34      0.30  +2.00
PBQ1   Frozen Pork Bellies Aug 2001               80.425     1.575  +2.00
NGK3   Henry Hub Natural Gas May 2003              3.660     0.071  +1.96

LOSERS

BDU1   Oriented Strand Board Sep 2001             217.00     -5.00  -2.42
HUZ1   New York Harbor Unleaded Gasoline Dec 20    0.7635   -0.0183  -2.38
PLN1   Platinum Jul 2001                           588.8     -14.1  -2.34
CLN1   Light Sweet Crude Oil Jul 2001              27.93     -0.50  -1.76
XEN1   Soybean Meal Jul 2001                       163.6      -2.8  -1.69
RRH2   Rough Rice Mar 2002                         5.940    -0.100  -1.66
HON1   Heating Oil Jul 2001                       0.7592   -0.0126  -1.63
DAQ1   BFP Milk Aug 2001                           15.46     -0.20  -1.28
SMN1   Soybean Meal Jul 2001                       163.6      -2.1  -1.27
PNZ1   Propane Dec 2001                           0.5150   -0.0065  -1.25
____________________________________________________________________________

E X T R E M E   S T O C K S
____________________________________________________________________________

Updated every 10 minutes around the clock.
More at http://quotes.ino.com/analysis/extremes/stocks/

WINNERS

CN     CALTON,INC(NEW)                              5.94      1.13  +23.49
PDC    SOUTH TEXAS DRILLING & EXPL                  6.30      1.10  +21.15
AGIX   ATHEROGENICS                                 6.32      0.97  +18.30
SPLX   SIMPLEX SOLUTIONS                           28.00      4.34  +18.24
HLIT   HARMONIC INC                                10.01      1.49  +17.43
OS     OREGON STEEL MILLS                           8.45      1.25  +17.34
XTND   EXTENDED SYSTEMS                             7.86      1.10  +16.30
QRSI   QRS CORP                                    13.53      1.69  +14.81
CMNT   COMPUTER NETWORK TECHNOLOGY                 10.21      1.30  +14.67
PSSI   PSS WORLD MEDICAL                            5.90      0.75  +14.62

LOSERS

IDT    IDT CORP                                    14.65    -11.48  -43.93
EMEX   EMEX CORP                                   11.67     -3.12  -21.02
USG    USG CORP                                     6.69     -1.67  -19.98
KPN    ROYAL PTT NEDERLAND ADS                      7.99     -1.30  -14.01
ROAD   ROADWAY CORP                                22.45     -3.61  -13.79
PROX   PROXIM INC                                  12.75     -1.80  -12.59
ARTL   ARISTOTLE CORP                               8.96     -1.10  -12.57
CHH    CHOICE HOTELS INTL                          11.90     -1.70  -12.41
CLPT   CELLPOINT INC                                6.01     -0.79  -11.57
OCCF   OPTICAL CABLE                                9.91     -1.21  -10.99

FREE MANAGED FUTURES & IRA RETIREMENT KIT
http://www.ino.com/specials/icm/

$$$$   Foreign Exchange Traders! INO.com now has
$$$$   real-time cross rates, FREE online at:
$$$$   http://quotes.ino.com/exchanges/forex-cross/
_____________________________________________________________________

T H A N K   Y O U
_____________________________________________________________________

Thank you for subscribing to the Extreme Markets Daily Digest from INO.com
( http://www.ino.com/ ). If you want to subscribe to our other email
services, or would like to modify your profile please visit
http://www.ino.com/email/.

To subscribe a friend, visit:
  http://www.ino.com/email/

To unsubscribe, visit:
  http://www.ino.com/email/remove/?email=alewis@enron.com&list=evening

--
Copyright 1998-2001 INO.com. All Rights Reserved.


Attached is another redlined draft of the Pastoria IM.  It is much more close
to completion because it now includes comments from all necessary parties.

Please carefully review and send me any changes no later than Monday.  If you
send them today (Sunday) send them via e-mail.  Beginning Monday (12 PM CDT)
I'll be in SF, so if you fax them send them to 415.782.7827.

Please call me at 713.629.0929 or 713.398.6412 should you have any
questions.  Thanks.

PS  for Dave Parquet:  Not all of your proposed changes were made simply
because I could not ready many of them and the changes were too late at night
to call you.  I was asked to get a draft out ASAP so I will call you today
(Sunday) to discuss them.


I have revised Exhibit 1 of the retail supply agreement pursuant to our
meeting
last week. Two changes were made:

 1)  Tennessee Zone 6 premium for 1/2000 was corrected to +.06.
 2) Volume requirements for Choice programs with storage were
reduced in most cases to account for storage gas being withdrawn. These are
the
final volumes.

 - GAS PURCHASE AGREEMENT EXHIBIT 1                     REV 1-13.xl


An update on our change for the Storage Allocation.  Several questions
have come up over the weekend.  The weekend crew is documenting the
questions.  I have left Mike Bodnar and John Buchanan a phone mail message
to research the questions and concerns on Monday.  Then we will group with
storage and determine what changes need to be made.

One change we talked about on the Sunday morning call with storage is to
be able to use SBS on the non allocated portion of storage.  ie, if we are
allocating injections, then withdrawals should still use SBS.  If we are allocating
withdrawals, then injections should still have access to SBS.  Mike Bodnar will
pursue this enhancement further.  Thanks. Lynn

Lynn Blair
06/17/2001 04:56 PM
To:	Shelley Corman/ET&S/Enron, Brad Holmes/ENRON@enronXgate, Rick Dietz/ET&S/Enron, Sheila Nacey/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:	Terry Kowalke/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michael Bodnar/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lynn Blair/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Gerry Medeles/ET&S/Enron

Subject:	Re: FW: Storage allocations

FYI.  Just to keep ya'll in the loop.  This fix should be ready for test on Monday
and migrated Monday night for Tuesday's use.  This fix will be very beneficial
in minimizing Shipper imbalances on NNG.  Terry and Gerry will work with the teams
to be sure everyone is up to speed on the change.  If you have any questions while I
am out next week, please check with Terry Kowalke or Mike Bodnar.   Thanks. Lynn
---------------------- Forwarded by Lynn Blair/ET&S/Enron on 06/17/2001 04:50 PM ---------------------------

	  From:  John Buchanan                           06/15/2001 03:28 PM

To:	Gerry Medeles/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:	Steven January/ENRON@enronXgate, Lynn Blair/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Hasan Kedwaii/ENRON@enronXgate, Jill Setera/ENRON@enronXgate, Maggie Matheson/ENRON@enronXgate, Sue Neville/ENRON@enronXgate, Brad Holmes/ENRON@enronXgate, Michael Bodnar/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Reyna Cabrera/ET&S/Enron, Terry Kowalke/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject:	Re: FW: Storage allocations

Per: Lynn Blair
Moving the storage allocation to before confirmations will be made only to the ID/2 cycle.

Thanks: John Buchanan

From:	Gerry Medeles/ENRON@enronXgate on 06/15/2001 03:17 PM
To:	Steven January/ENRON@enronXgate, Lynn Blair/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Hasan Kedwaii/ENRON@enronXgate, Jill Setera/ENRON@enronXgate, John Buchanan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Maggie Matheson/ENRON@enronXgate, Sue Neville/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:	Brad Holmes/ENRON@enronXgate

Subject:	FW: Storage allocations

FYI, with regards to item (3) below:
SBS will remain off after storage allocations are completed.  This will be a slight change for our customers.  Currently during the processes for example, the evening process, SBS is available during the Rollover, Allocation and Confirmation process, and turned off during the Storage Allocation process.  With this change SBS will only be available during the Rollover and Allocation process and remain off during the Storage Allocation and Confirmation process, if a storage allocation is necessary.  I am unsure how you would want to communicate this to your customers.

Also, Jill will be working on these changes over the weekend, and have Joe confirm her change by Monday the 18th.  Changes should be available for production by Tuesday the 19th.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kedwaii, Hasan
Sent:	Friday, June 15, 2001 12:52 PM
To:	Setera, Jill
Cc:	Matheson, Maggie; Medeles, Gerry
Subject:	Storage allocations

Jill,
Lynn and Steve January want to change the storage allocation from after confirmation to after regular allocations during all cycles except timely (for the timely cycle it storage allocations will be after confirmations).

I looked at the code and it seemed to be pretty self contained module.  But a few things to look out for:

1) Process for saving to the database
	- after allocations
	- after storage allocations
	- after confirmations
2) rollback of allocations to include storage
3) SBS - currently it turned off for the storage allocation process.  How does it get turned back on?  Business group has to make a decision on how whether SBS needs to turned on or off for the confirmation process

Please let maggie or gerry know the time estimate.

Thanx

<Embedded StdOleLink>


Last year money was to be set aside in reserves to cover the net amount needed
to resolve these issues with Transco, BUG , LILCO and Enron.  The total
dollars
required was approximately $4.25 million.  An amount of $3.55 million needed
for
the Transco historical imbalance resolution.  The remaining balance was needed
for the BUG and LILCO accounting issues that Keyspan brought to our attention
last year.

Bob Hall has $3.5 million reserved in his area for the Transco historical
imbalance.
The remaining $50,000 for Transco and approximately $700,000 of additional
funds
for the accounting issues were to be reserved last year under "The Office of
the
Chairman".  Sally Beck and Janet Dietrich arranged for this additional money
to
be reserved at the "Chairman" level since the additional funds were needed to
correct an old accounting problem that should not hit the East Desk P&L.
Also, the
arrangement was that the reserve would be maintained until the settlement
payments
were made by Enron.

As with most stories, there is some good news and some bad news.  First, the
bad news.
After a great deal of investigation, it appears that there currently is no
reserve at the
"Office of the Chairman"  for these additional funds.  Now, the good news.
Georgeanne
will take the necessary steps to make sure there is money available so that
we can
quickly resolve these issues with Keyspan and Transco.

If you have questions, please give me a call.

Ruth
x31667


Kay, see attached.  The monthly fee should be $13,003.  I took the $300k we
have all been discussing and backed out the $12,500 they paid under the ILA
terms.

Reagan C. Rorschach
Enron North America
1400 Smith Street
Houston, Texas 77002
713.345.3363

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Mann, Kay
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 11:35 AM
To: Mann, Kay
Cc: Rorschach, Reagan; Kroll, Heather; Fairley, David; May, Tom
Subject: Re: Open items for MDEA

More:

We need internal agreement on the cancellation fee schedule, to be included
as an exhibit.

What is the status of the Yazoo City master gas agreement?  Do we still want
a master gas agreement for Clarksdale, also?  Do we want it now?

Thanks,

Kay

Kay Mann
05/23/2001 05:05 PM
To: Reagan Rorschach/Enron@EnronXGate, Heather Kroll/Enron@EnronXGate, David
Fairley/Enron@EnronXGate, Tom May/Enron@EnronXGate
cc:

Subject: Open items for MDEA

Here are issues which I'm unclear about, all of which impact the drafting of
the agreement:

How are we setting the heat rate?  Do we have the GADS (?)?  Is it a daily
average, weekly average?  Flat rate? Adjusted? If so, how often?

Are we comfortable that there are no permit restrictions?

We have determined that we won't deal with fuel oil, right?

We aren't making money on gas, right?

Do we have a defn of costs that we like yet, and if so, how does it fit in to
the picture?

Is there an up-to-date set of exhibits?

It would help if theh commercial part of the team could send me the
following, in words and/or formulae:

The defn and method of establishing the bogey (target production cost)
formula can be an exhibit, which would be great for the commercial team to
work on.   Are we determined how we should deal with imbalances (part of cost
of power)?  How are we setting the bogey?  Formula?  Subject to audit? Two
bogeys or one (gas and oil)?

What is defn of profit?  I think I have the general idea, but a sentence or
two would be helpful as a reality check.  What costs are included on the buy
and sell side?

Re stack model: a sentence or two describing what it is and how it is used.

Updated exhibit on facilities, contracted resources, operating limits.

What information does MDEA need for us to provide in order to split
costs/profits?  Are we clear that Cities buy gas, MDEA buys/sells power?

It would be great if I could get one set of answers to these
questions/issues, which has commercial buy in all around.

Thanks,

Kay


This request has been pending your approval for  3 days.  Please click http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000080512&Page=Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000080512
Request Create Date : 1/7/02 5:01:54 PM
Requested For       : stephen.benchluch@enron.com
Resource Name       : Market Data Kobra Power
Resource Type       : Applications


you might want to save yourself the agony of having to listen to me sing!

Shanna Husser@ENRON
02/28/2000 11:05 AM
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re:

Well- if mean- you are volunteering- I'm all ears.

	From:  Eric Bass @ ECT                           02/28/2000 10:51 AM

To: Shanna Husser/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re:

you mean you don't want me to sing it anyway?

Shanna Husser@ENRON
02/28/2000 10:46 AM
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

Lucky for you that Tim and Lisa decided to go to Kenny Rogers.  I guess that
means that you are off the hook with having to sing "Though the Years"  :-)


Please plan to attend a meeting to discuss the transition from internal pools
to service contract pools...

  Wednesday, February 9, 2000
  at 2pm in EB3084

 If you are not able to attend this meeting please send someone in your
place.

 Thank you,
 Heather Choate
 for Scotty Gilbert
---------------------- Forwarded by Heather Choate/HOU/ECT on 02/01/2000
03:23 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Scotty Gilbert                           02/01/2000 02:48 PM

To: Heather Choate/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, George Smith,
Edward Terry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert
Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda F Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryce Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Internal Pool Meeting

Heather can you set up a meeting in my office to discuss the transition from
internal pools to service contract pools.

Scotty

attendees
R. Gay
K. Kelly
G. Smith
E. Terry
D. Farmer
P. Klyne

or sub if they cannot attend


Rob

I'm arriving at 12:30 on Wednesday.  I would like to spend from 2 to 7 on Wednesday with the trading group (with all traders attending).

Topics

1.  Full Gas Alberta and B.C. Fundamentals.

2.  Same for Power

3.  EOL discussion.  Number of trades etc.

4.  Volume Discussion.

5.  Position Discussion.

I'm staying until Saturday morning.  I wouldn't mind playing golf late Friday.  If you can't make it for family reasons, I understand.  I wouldn't mind playing Silver Tip.

On Thursday and Friday morning besides sitting in on Retail Meetings I would like to talk about.

1.  PPA sale.

2.  Wholesale customer coverage and EOL usage from real customers.

3.  Other big deals we are looking at.  We need some.

4.  Anything else you want to talk about.

Also

Wednesday and Thursday night I will eat and drink with anybody you want we to eat and drink with.

Can you get Nella to coordinate with Dave and send me an adgenda.

Thanks

John


Needlepoint Road city gate - Intersection of Needlepoint Road and SH146 in
Chambers County
  Spring city gate - 24000 East Hardy Road in Harris County
  Pheasant Creek city gate - Intersection of Burney Road and Voss Road in
Fort Bend County
  Sugarland city gate - Highway 6 and Flanagan Road in Fort Bend County
  Greatwood city gate - North of I-59 near the Brazos River in Fort Bend
County

The new Sugarland City gate will replace the following city gates which will
be eliminated as a part of the Greatwood Lateral project:

Alkire Lakes - Meter Station #2004
Venetian Estates - Meter Station #2133
Sugarland - Meter Station #2132
Smith Tap - Meter Station #2126
Edgewood - Meter Station #2046
Richmond - Meter Station #2116


Rob,this deal is not dead; I am primarly waiting on NEPCO numbers.

You should be moving down the road on the deconstruction, refurbishment and
movement of the NB machines.   You should also be doing any development work
(permits, interconnection agreements et al) you need to do to maintain the
optionality of this project (let me know if the expenses get above $1MM).

Randy, please facilitate. Mike, can we put the screws to ABB given the
significant transformer business we forwarded their way?

Laura, we probably need to make a call on the Peoples turbine pretty soon.

Eric/Rob, I think we need to see the project with IDC come in  between 350 to
400/kw to be viable or I need a very detailed analysis of why it costs
significantly more than a Frame 7 machine in the US markets.

I would like see us make this work.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 06/02/2000
03:18 PM ---------------------------

Rob Milnthorp
06/02/2000 10:16 AM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Eric LeDain/CAL/ECT@ECT, Kyle Kitagawa/CAL/ECT@ECT
Subject: Moore Power Plant status

Dave, the impression we are getting is that Houston thinks this deal is dead
or on the back burner. Until you tell me otherwise, we are going full steam
ahead. Is there any way that you can help us get the airtime we need down
south? We are now down to crunch time, and I dont want to see this project
slip away due to control groups dragging their feet.

Regards
Milnthorp

---------------------- Forwarded by Rob Milnthorp/CAL/ECT on 06/02/2000 08:52
AM ---------------------------
From: Eric LeDain on 06/01/2000 05:12 PM
To: Kyle Kitagawa/CAL/ECT@ECT, Rob Milnthorp/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Moore Power Plant status

The following is a status update of key current items:
1. We continue to try to confirm the viability of the Peoples units.  We have
not received NOx versus water injection data.  We still have not received the
full noise spectrum data.  It looks like the only source for this is ABB and
they're not fast.  Peoples and ourselves are going after ABB on these issues
(and the possibility of a change order on the exciter design which doesn't
meet Ontario specs).
 - we have confirmed that the municipality can provide 600 USGPM of water,
but the silica content has to be confirmed to see if it's a problem.  I met
with Terra Industrial Tuesday and they remain interested in providing the
treated water, but they would have to expand their treatment plant.  They can
provide 1/3rd of the water required and their permit can handle the waste
stream on regen for the full water flow - we're sorting out the optimum tank
capacity versus treatment plant capacity sizing to meet reliability at
minimum cost.  Bottom line is we've got options to handle this water flow and
we can avoid trying to get a permit for waste water.
 - we're going to use the noise consultant EE&CC used in conjunction with
Agra Envir. in Canada to sort out the low frequency noise problem, and check
the other frequencies against our nearest receptor, once we get the data from
ABB.
 - Peoples are checking with ABB on the possibility of a change order on the
exciter design.
2. MCN/Columbus have come back on the other two N2 units - they want another
$1 MM US and can't confirm any changes to the contract.
We are completing our comparison of the Peoples/MCN contracts - the MCN
contract is much better (guarantees, liquidated damages etc.) but of course
power output is less.
3. We kicked off Agra to prepare our permit amendment (using data from both
the Peoples N2's and MCN N2's).
4. NEPCO capital cost estimate will be ready June 9th.  It looks like $2-3 MM
will come out of the base estimate for the N1's due to the acceleration and
winter work coming out.  They still have to do the N2 estimate.  There might
be a chance to push this ahead to the end of the 7th if we were to pressure
them more.
5. We feel we can increase our N1 output up by 6 MW at 90F without
incremental O&M.  The Peoples units would add an incremental 40 MW at 90F.

Using the Peoples units our capital per kW at 90 F is $397 US/kW (using our
original $156 MM incl. IDC estimate less $2 MM).
Using the MCN units our capital per kW at 90F is $443 US/kW.

Issues:
1. We are not getting great support from Houston in many areas, with the
exception of some like Don Miller/Genco.  It appears that some groups like
underwriting/RAC and structuring either are getting the message this project
is not going ahead, or are taking our continued delays in approval to work on
all of their other priorities (hoping that we will go away presumably...).
Schedule becomes more of a concern every day.
2. The Ontario interconnection timing becomes more and more of a concern each
day that passes as OH isn't the fastest working entity.  Aleck and Duncan
continue to work the IMO/OHSC/OEB angles but with some of the rules not set
yet we may need higher level pressure at some time soon.  I'll let you know.


Hey Sara, thanx for your words of encouragement.  It is very important to me
that you think that I am doing a good job, the positive feedback offsets all
the frantic calls from the people downstairs.

The Authroized Traders List for Enron Credit Inc. is done -- we really just
need to finalize the agreements with the brokers which i think can happen
quickly since we are not trying to reinvent the wheel.

I just realized that my conference call with Anna is 10 New York time and
then I have a conference call with Claude on his deal. So, I am going to get
on your calendar tomorrow but it might not be until late morning, not first
thing.  At the meeting, I can let you know where we stand with the other
tasks.

Cheryl Nelson
Senior Counsel
EB3816
(713) 345-4693


Thought this might be of interest to you.  Ray

---------------------- Forwarded by Ray Alvarez/NA/Enron on 07/26/2001 02:43 PM ---------------------------

Nancy Bagot
07/26/2001 09:51 AM
To:	Julie.Armstrong@ENRON.com, Nancy.Bagot@ENRON.com, Martha.Benner@ENRON.com, Lynn.Blair@ENRON.com, Sharon.Brown@ENRON.com, Janet.Butler@ENRON.com, Deb.Cappiello@ENRON.com, Alma.Carrillo@ENRON.com, Janet.Cones@ENRON.com, Bill.Cordes@ENRON.com, Shelley.Corman@ENRON.com, Rick.Dietz@ENRON.com, Dari.Dornan@ENRON.com, John.Dushinske@ENRON.com, Drew.Fossum@ENRON.com, Ava.Garcia@ENRON.com, John.Goodpasture@ENRON.com, Steven.Harris@ENRON.com, Joe.Hartsoe@ENRON.com, Glen.Hass@ENRON.com, Rod.Hayslett@ENRON.com, Bambi.Heckerman@ENRON.com, Theresa.Hess@ENRON.com, Staci.Holtzman@ENRON.com, Stanley.Horton@ENRON.com, Steve.Hotte@ENRON.com, Rita.Houser@ENRON.com, Steven.January@ENRON.com, Steven.J.Kean@ENRON.com, Robert.Kilmer@ENRON.com, Frazier.King@ENRON.com, Steve.Kirk@ENRON.com, Tim.Kissner@ENRON.com, Laura.Lantefield@ENRON.com, Terry.Lehn@ENRON.com, Teb.Lokey@ENRON.com, Danny.McCarty@ENRON.com, Dorothy.McCoppin@ENRON.com, Mike.McGowan@ENRON.com, Kent.Miller@ENRON.com, MKMiller@ENRON.com, michael.p.moran@enron.com, Sheila.Nacey@ENRON.com, Ray.Neppl@ENRON.com, Dave.Neubauer@ENRON.com, Zelda.Paschal@ENRON.com, Maria.Pavlou@ENRON.com, Keith.Petersen@ENRON.com, Janet.Place@ENRON.com, Tony.Pryor@ENRON.com, Lisa.Sawyer@ENRON.com, Donna.Scott@ENRON.com, Emily.Sellers@ENRON.com, Sharon.Solon@ENRON.com, Cindy.Stark@ENRON.com, James.Studebaker@ENRON.com, Gina.Taylor@ENRON.com, Stephen.Veatch@ENRON.com, Iris.Waser@ENRON.com, Ricki.Winters@ENRON.com, rebecca.w.cantrell@enron.com, Eva Neufeld/Enron@EnronXGate, Ruth Mann/Enron@EnronXGate, Gregory J. Porter/ENRON@enronXgate, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ray Alvarez/NA/Enron@ENRON, Donna Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Karina Prizont/Enron@EnronXGate
cc:

Subject:	FERC Order on Reporting CA gas sales

Attached is the Commission's "Order Imposing Reporting Requirement on Natural Gas Sales to California Market," which was issued late yesterday.

In the order, the Commission finds that if does have the authority to request the information as set out in the May 18 order proposing the requirements.

The information is to cover August 1, 2001 through Sept. 30, 2002 (the end date coincides with the end of the Commission's mitigation plan re: wholesal prices in California and the West).
Specific info gas sellers and LDCs file concernign purchase and sales transactions is exempt from FOIA disclosure
Also, respondents may request privileged treatment of "other portions of their responses subject to the.....Commission's regulations"
Some of the questions have been modified based on comments received based on comments received on the May 18th proposal
Transaction by transaction data is required; FERC will aggregate the information
The information request will NOT be expanded beyond California
FERC is providing the reporting format as a data template to be available on RIMS.

The order is attached here, and the appendix listing specific questions is below.

==========================================================================

APPENDIX

Answers to all questions below that require a statement of volumes should set forth the requested volumes on an MMBtu basis.

For Interstate Natural Gas Pipelines:

1.	On a daily basis for the period August 1, 2001 to January 31, 2002, please provide the following information for each contract for transportation to the California border:

a.	the transaction or contract identification number;
b.	the terms and effective date of the contract;
c.	contract demand by shipper;
d.	the daily scheduled volume by shipper;
e.	the daily nominated volume by shipper;
f.	the daily delivered volume by shipper;
g.	whether the service is firm or interruptible;
h.	the rate charged in $$/MMbtu;
i.	primary receipt and delivery points associated with the contract; and,
j.	whether the shipper is affiliated with the pipeline.

Along with the hard copy response, please provide a CD-ROM containing the response to this question.  Please provide this information in Excel version 97 or 2000 or comma separated value (CSV) format.

2.	For the period August 1, 2001 to January 31, 2002, please provide the following information for each capacity release transaction for transportation to the California border:

a.	the transaction or contract identification number, or offer number;
(This number should tie to contract number reported in Question 1,a., above)
b.	the name of the releasing shipper;
c.	the name of the acquiring shipper;
d.	the contract quantity;
e.	the acquiring shipper's contract rate; and,
f.	the releasing shipper's contract rate.

Along with the hard copy response, please provide a CD-ROM containing the response to this question.  Please provide this information in Excel version 97 or 2000 or comma separated value (CSV) format.
Docket No. RM01-9-000	- 6 -

3.	On a daily basis for the period August 1, 2001 to January 31, 2002, please provide the following system information:

a.	the maximum peak day design capacity;
b 	the daily maximum flowing capacity;
c 	the daily scheduled system volume;
d.	the daily delivered system volume;
e.	the daily scheduled volume at each California delivery point;
f.	an explanation of each instance that the daily maximum flowing capacity is below the maximum peak day design capacity; and,
g.	an explanation of any daily variance in the maximum flowing capacity.

Along with the hard copy response, please provide a CD-ROM containing the response to this question.  Please provide this information in Excel version 97 or 2000 or comma separated value (CSV) format.

4.	On a daily basis for May 1999 and May 2000, please provide the following system information:

a.	the maximum peak day design capacity;
b 	the daily maximum flowing capacity;
c 	the daily scheduled system volume;
d.	the daily delivered system volume, and,
e.	the daily scheduled volume at each California delivery point.

Along with the hard copy response, please provide a CD-ROM containing the response to this question.  Please provide this information in Excel version 97 or 2000 or comma separated value (CSV) format.

For Sellers of Natural Gas to the California Market:

1.	State whether the seller is affiliated with an interstate or intrastate natural gas pipeline company or local distribution company, and, if so, give the name and address the affiliated company.

2.	 On a daily basis for the period August 1, 2001 to January 31, 2002, please provide the following information for each contract in which you sold natural gas and the gas is physically delivered at points on the California border or in California:
a.	the sales contract's identification number;
b.	the term of the sales contract (beginning and ending dates);
c.	the name of the buyer identifying whether the buyer is an energy marketer, local distribution company, or end user;
d.	the volumes sold (on a MMBtu basis);
e.	the price paid by buyer, and
f.	whether the price is fixed or indexed (identify the index).

Along with the hard copy response, please provide a CD-ROM containing the response to this question.  Please provide this information in Excel version 97 or 2000 or comma separated value (CSV) format.

3.	For each sales contract, identify separately the transportation component and the gas commodity component of the price.  If the sales contract specifies the transportation component of the price, the seller shall report that amount.  If the sales contract only includes an overall price, then the seller shall report the transportation cost it incurred in moving the gas from the point where it purchased the gas to the point where it sold the gas and how it determined that amount.  If the sale was made at the same point where the gas was purchased, and there is no transportation element in the sale, the seller shall respond "n.a."

Along with the hard copy response, please provide a CD-ROM containing the response to this question.  Please provide this information in Excel version 97 or 2000 or comma separated value (CSV) format.

4.	For the period August 1, 2001 to January 31, 2002, please provide the following information on a daily basis for each of your gas purchase contracts associated with the sales contracts you identified in response to Question 2:

a.	the purchase contract's identification number;
b.	the pipeline upstream of the point of delivery; and the pipeline downstream of the point of delivery;
c.	the term of the purchase contract (beginning and ending dates);
d.	the daily volumes (on a MMBtu basis) purchased;
e.	the price paid;
           f.         whether the price is fixed or indexed (identify the index),
g .	identify the entity from whom the responder purchased the gas; and,
h.	identify the point where responder took title to the gas.

Along with the hard copy response, please provide a CD-ROM containing the response to this question.  Please provide this information in Excel version 97 or 2000 or comma separated value (CSV) format.

For Local Distribution Companies In California:

1.	Provide your system's gas sales and transportation requirements, (i.e, contract demands and daily demands) by core, non-core, electric generation, and non-utility loads.  Provide a break down of these demands by type of service (e.g., sales and transportation) and quality of service(firm/interruptible).

Along with the hard copy response, please provide a CD-ROM containing the response to this question.  Please provide this information in Excel version 97 or 2000 or comma separated value (CSV) format.

2.	On a daily basis for the period August 1, 2001 to January 31, 2002, please provide the following information for each contract the local distribution company has with a transportation customer:

a.	contract demand by shipper;
b.	the daily scheduled volume by shipper;
c.	the daily delivered volume by shipper;
d.	whether the service is firm or interruptible;
e.	the rate charged; and,
f.	receipt and delivery points associated with the contract.

Along with the hard copy response, please provide a CD-ROM containing the response to this question.  Please provide this information in Excel version 97 or 2000 or comma separated value (CSV) format.

3.	On a daily basis for the period August 1, 2001 to January 31, 2002, please provide the following information for each contract the local distribution company has with a sales customer:

a.	the contract demand by purchaser;
b.	the term of the sales contract (beginning and ending dates);
c.	the volumes (on a MMBtu basis) sold; and,
d.	the price paid by purchaser.

Along with the hard copy response, please provide a CD-ROM containing the response to this question.  Please provide this information in Excel version 97 or 2000 or comma separated value (CSV) format.

4.	On a daily basis for the period August 1, 2001 to January 31, 2002, please provide the following information for each gas purchase contract:

a.	the purchase contract's identification number;
b.	the term of the purchase contract (beginning and ending dates);
c.	the volumes (on a MMBtu basis) bought;
d.	the price paid;
e.	whether the price is fixed or indexed (identify the index); and,
f.	identify the point where (name of local distribution company) took title to the gas.

Along with the hard copy response, please provide a CD-ROM containing the response to this question.  Please provide this information in Excel version 97 or 2000 or comma separated value (CSV) format.

5.	On a daily basis for the period August 1, 2001 to January 31, 2002, please provide by interstate pipeline the type and quantity of transportation service your system has under contract.  At each receipt point, provide maximum peak day design capacity, the daily maximum flowing capacity, the daily nominated capacity and the daily scheduled volumes of the local distribution system.

Along with the hard copy response, please provide a CD-ROM containing the response to this question.  Please provide this information in Excel version 97 or 2000 or comma separated value (CSV) format.

6.	On a daily basis for the period August 1, 2001 to January 31, 2002, please provide on a system-wide basis your storage service rights i.e., capacity and deliverability rights.  Additionally, provide daily storage balances, injections and withdrawls.

Along with the hard copy response, please provide a CD-ROM containing the response to this question.  Please provide this information in Excel version 97 or 2000 or comma separated value (CSV) format.

7.	On a daily basis for the period August 1, 2001 to January 31, 2002, please provide how much of your system's gas supply was from intrastate production sources.  Separately identify the sources, volumes, receipt points, and prices.  Include the total system supply in your response.
Along with the hard copy response, please provide a CD-ROM containing the response to this question.  Please provide this information in Excel version 97 or 2000 or comma separated value (CSV) format.

8.	Provide a summary of your system's gas purchases in the following categories:

a.	daily spot purchases;
b.	monthly;
c.	short-term (more than 1 month and less than 1 year);
d.	medium-term (1-3 years); and,
e.	long-term ( more than 3 years).

by month for each of the last three years in the following format:

a.	price;
b.	volume; and,
c.	identify, by name, where these purchases were made (producing basin or at the California border).

Along with the hard copy response, please provide a CD-ROM containing the response to this question.  Please provide this information in Excel version 97 or 2000 or comma separated value (CSV) format.


Left you a voicemail last nite.  I get on the plane Houston at 6:30 AM PDT,
so you'll have to do it solo.  I'll get to the office around 130-200.  I'll
come to your office and you can fill me in on how it went.

Best,
Jeff


458718 should be pm expiry, not deal 458634

thanks


sorry for the delay-- I thought tuesday was bad for you so I have wednesday
at 10. if that doesnt work-- anytime tomorrow.
-----Original Message-----
From: Andy.Zipper@enron.com [mailto:Andy.Zipper@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2000 10:08 AM
To: mbergonia@edfman.com
Subject: Call

When do you want to have a call to discuss this ? I'd like to do something
sooner rather than later. I thought 10:00 today was scheduled but I could
have it wrong. Give me a call.

Thanks
Andy Zipper
(713) 853 6994


The following expense report is ready for approval:

Employee Name: Robert L. Bradley Jr
Status last changed by:  Automated Administrator
Expense Report Name: Robert L Bradley Jr
Report Total: $5,092.29
Amount Due Employee: $5,092.29

To approve this expense report, click on the following link for Concur
Expense.
http://expensexms.enron.com


Surprise, surprise.

SDG&E is afraid to do anything without the pre-approved reasonableness from
the CPUC which I don't think will be obtained.

Chris

Chris
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT on 09/11/2000
05:59 AM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Firooz, Sharon" <SFirooz@SDGE.com>
09/08/2000 05:32 PM

To: "Hart, Dana" <DHart@SDGE.com>, "'agalatic@internetconnect.net'"
<agalatic@internetconnect.net>, "'al_figueroa@vflet.com'"
<al_figueroa@vflet.com>, "'bbowman@coral-energy.com'"
<bbowman@coral-energy.com>, "'biggsbg@bp.com'" <biggsbg@bp.com>,
"'bob_anderson@apses.com'" <bob_anderson@apses.com>,
"'ccantor@sempratrading.com'" <ccantor@sempratrading.com>,
"'cfoster@enron.com'" <cfoster@enron.com>, "'david_metz@apsc.com'"
<david_metz@apsc.com>, "'dcazalet@apx.com'" <dcazalet@apx.com>,
"'dgordon@exchange.ml.com'" <dgordon@exchange.ml.com>,
"'dirk.andreas@nrgenergy.com'" <dirk.andreas@nrgenergy.com>,
"'dparque@ect.enron.com'" <dparque@ect.enron.com>,
"'dpenney@coral-energy.com'" <dpenney@coral-energy.com>,
"'emaddox@seawestwindpower.com'" <emaddox@seawestwindpower.com>,
"'gkosier@newenergy.com'" <gkosier@newenergy.com>, "'gluna@sempra-slns.com'"
<gluna@sempra-slns.com>, "'greg.kelly@gen.pge.com'" <greg.kelly@gen.pge.com>,
"'hreed@powersrc.com'" <hreed@powersrc.com>,
"'jackmcnamara.geothermal@att.net'" <jackmcnamara.geothermal@att.net>,
"'james.north@msdw.com'" <james.north@msdw.com>,
"'jay.alexander@southernenergy.com'" <jay.alexander@southernenergy.com>,
"'jdcoggin@srpnet.com'" <jdcoggin@srpnet.com>, "'jim_staggs@apses.com'"
<jim_staggs@apses.com>, "'jivey@utilicorp.com'" <jivey@utilicorp.com>,
"'john_h_stout@reliantenergy.com'" <john_h_stout@reliantenergy.com>,
"'jon.fischer@pacificorp.com'" <jon.fischer@pacificorp.com>,
"'jpmarchand@aep.com'" <jpmarchand@aep.com>,
"'Kristen_L_Sullivan@reliantenergy.com'"
<Kristen_L_Sullivan@reliantenergy.com>, "'lbryant@pnm.com'"
<lbryant@pnm.com>, "'leah.bissonette@williams.com'"
<leah.bissonette@williams.com>, "'Lhamilton@avistaenergy.com'"
<Lhamilton@avistaenergy.com>, "'marvin_k_ballard@reliantenergy.com'"
<marvin_k_ballard@reliantenergy.com>, "'medwar@ladwp.com'"
<medwar@ladwp.com>, "'njwa@dynegy.com'" <njwa@dynegy.com>,
"'peterc@calpine.com'" <peterc@calpine.com>, "'priced@epenergy.com'"
<priced@epenergy.com>, "'pscarpelli@retx.com'" <pscarpelli@retx.com>,
"'rproush@duke-energy.com'" <rproush@duke-energy.com>, "'rshimizu@mieco.com'"
<rshimizu@mieco.com>, "'sbvanleer@duke-energy.com'"
<sbvanleer@duke-energy.com>, "'shapp@caiso.com'" <shapp@caiso.com>,
"'stacey.kusters@powerex.com'" <stacey.kusters@powerex.com>,
"'szablyal@epenergy.com'" <szablyal@epenergy.com>,
"'tmcandrew@statoilenergy.com'" <tmcandrew@statoilenergy.com>
cc:
Subject: SDG&E Bilateral Authority Delay

SDG&E would like to inform you that  we did not gain authority from the
commission on 9/7 and cannot enter into bilateral trades at present; (2) we
anticipate receiving that approval on September 21; we will solicit new
proposals between now and then and look forward to your continuing
participation, as well as your assistance in gaining the necessary
regulatory approvals.  Thanks


"1. Do what's right. Be on time, be polite, and be honest; remain free from
drugs; and if you have any questions, get out your Bible.
2. Do your best. Mediocrity is unacceptable when you are capable of doing
better.
3. Treat others as you want to be treated. Practice love and understanding."
           -- Lou Holtz (Three rules for success)

 May there always be work for your hands to do,
 May your purse always hold a coin or two.
 May the sun always shine warm on your windowpane,
 May a rainbow be certain to follow each rain.
 May the hand of a friend always be near you, And may God fill your heart
with gladness to cheer you. -- Irish Blessing


David,

I regret to inform you I am unable to attend the conference due to previous
commitments.
Would you consider a speakers form our London office?

Vince

David Warwick <djw@kwi.com> on 04/24/2001 09:47:31 AM
To: "'Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com'" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: RE: KWI User Group

Vince

Any further thoughts on this ?

David

-----Original Message-----
From: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com [mailto:Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com]
Sent: 13 April 2001 21:44
To: djw@kwi.com
Cc: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com; vkaminski@aol.com
Subject: Re: KWI User Group

David,

Thanks for the invitation.
I shall check my schedule on Monday and will get back to you
regarding the conference.

I hope you will a very Happy Easter.

Vince

David Warwick <djw@kwi.com> on 04/12/2001 04:04:32 PM

To:   "'vince.j.kaminski@enron.com'" <vince.j.kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:  KWI User Group

Dear Vince

Please may I reintroduce myself. We met last year at the Sydney EPRM
conference which my company KWI sponsored. I chaired the session at which
you spoke.

As you may remember, my company, KWI are one of the world's leading
provider
of systems (kW3000) and consultancy for energy, trading and risk
management.
We have over 60 clients worldwide including many of the world's leading
energy companies (not Enron unfortunately):

North America
- TVA
- Ontario Power
- Cinergy
- Bonneville Power

Europe
- Enel
- ATEL
- Electrabel
- EDF

Nordic
- Vattenfall
- Fortum
- Sydkraft
- Statkraft
- Birka Energi
- Norsk Hydro

Each year we stage a "KWI Users Forum" - a 2-day event attended by leading
trading and risk staff from our clients. Last year there were about 100
delegates. The agenda primarily focusses on issues surrounding risk
management for the energy sector.

The agenda comprises keynote presentations on burning risk issues from
industry leading energy speakers and practical workshops focussed around
using our software.

This years event is at a luxury hotel in the wonderful Spanish city of
Barcelona and runs from the evening of Sunday September 9th to Tuesday
September 11th. The main conference dinner is on the Monday evening and is
always a memorable event. This year it is in a leading Barcelona restaurant
preceded by a bus tour of the city with a stop for pre-dinner drinks.

I would like to invite you to make the opening keynote address, the
highlight of the conference.

The subject could be:

*    a general energy risk related topic
*    a general insight into the secret of Enron's continued success in
the energy markets
*    your thoughts on the future development on energy markets (and other
commodity related - bandwidth etc.) worldwide

Obviously, we would cover all your delagate costs including accomodation,
food and drink.

What's in it for you ? Many of our users are some the energy sectors
leading
risk thinkers and I'm sure you would enjoy meeting them and exchanging
views.

Please let me know if you are able to accept the invitation.

Best regards

David Warwick - Marketing Dierctor and Co-founder


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 01/29/2001 01:32 PM -----

	exchangeinfo@nymex.com
	01/29/2001 01:19 PM

		 To: tana.jones@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: (01-34) Margin Rate Change for Propane

Notice No. 01-34
January 29, 2001

TO:
ALL NYMEX MEMBERS AND MEMBER FIRMS
ALL NYMEX CLEARING FIRMS
ALL NYMEX OPERATIONS MANAGERS

FROM:     Neal Wolkoff, Executive Vice President

SUBJECT:     MARGIN RATE CHANGE

Effective Date:    Tuesday, January 30, 2001 (close of business)

Futures Contract:  Propane Gas Futures

Contract Months: All Months

Rate Change:
NYMEX Division Margins for Propane Gas Futures Contracts

Effective Date:    Tuesday, January 30, 2001 (close of business)

Clearing Member (Maintenance Margin):            Old:  $1,900  New:  $2,500

Member Customer (Initial Margin):                Old:  $2,090  New:  $2,750

Non-Member Customer (Initial Margin):            Old:  $2,565  New:  $3,375

Should you have any questions regarding these changes, please contact Arthur
McCoy at (212) 299-2928 or Joe Sanguedolce at (212) 299-2855.  This notice
supersedes all previous notices regarding outright margins for the NYMEX
Propane Gas Futures Contracts.

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"
http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=tana.jones@enron.com&refdoc
=(01-34)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


call me when you have a chance, something i want to share

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Jai Hawker <JHawker@petersco.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, December 06, 2001 8:34 AM
To:	Richey, Cooper
Subject:	RE:

$10

-----Original Message-----
From: Cooper.Richey@enron.com [mailto:Cooper.Richey@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 8:34 AM
To: JHawker@petersco.com
Subject: RE:

i'm out. strings should put them on ebay.

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   Jai Hawker <JHawker@petersco.com>@ENRON
   Sent:   Thursday, December 06, 2001 8:29 AM
   To:     Richey, Cooper
   Subject:  RE:

   This is a civil case, not a criminal one so I believe we are working
   under a
   "preponderance of the evidence"  and not the "burden of proof"

   -----Original Message-----
   From: Cooper.Richey@enron.com [mailto:Cooper.Richey@enron.com]
   Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 8:27 AM
   To: JHawker@petersco.com
   Subject: RE:

   the burden of proof rests on your shoulders

       -----Original Message-----
      From:   Jai Hawker <JHawker@petersco.com>@ENRON
      Sent:   Thursday, December 06, 2001 8:26 AM
      To:     Richey, Cooper
      Subject:  RE:

      They were a gift.

      -----Original Message-----
      From: Cooper.Richey@enron.com [mailto:Cooper.Richey@enron.com]
      Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 8:25 AM
      To: JHawker@petersco.com
      Subject: RE:

      i'll just need a receipt and you're done

          -----Original Message-----
         From:   Jai Hawker <JHawker@petersco.com>@ENRON
         Sent:   Thursday, December 06, 2001 8:24 AM
         To:     Richey, Cooper
         Subject:  RE:

         Sure.  The original cost was $100.

         -----Original Message-----
         From: Cooper.Richey@enron.com [mailto:Cooper.Richey@enron.com]
         Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 8:23 AM
         To: JHawker@petersco.com
         Subject: RE:

         you're done on the 85% discount ?

             -----Original Message-----
            From:   Jai Hawker <JHawker@petersco.com>@ENRON
            Sent:   Thursday, December 06, 2001 8:21 AM
            To:     Richey, Cooper
            Subject:  RE:

            We should be done then.

            -----Original Message-----
            From: Cooper.Richey@enron.com [mailto:Cooper.Richey@enron.com]
            Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 7:51 AM
            To: JHawker@petersco.com
            Subject: RE:

            9

                -----Original Message-----
               From:   Jai Hawker <JHawker@petersco.com>@ENRON
               Sent:   Thursday, December 06, 2001 7:44 AM
               To:     Richey, Cooper
               Subject:  RE:

               What size are your shoes?

               -----Original Message-----
               From: Cooper.Richey@enron.com
   [mailto:Cooper.Richey@enron.com]
               Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 7:44 AM
               To: JHawker@petersco.com
               Subject: RE:

               i'd have to see them and they'd have to fit my shoes, but as
      long
         as
            the
               discount is in the 85-90% range,
               i'm cool with it.

                   -----Original Message-----
                  From:   Jai Hawker <JHawker@petersco.com>@ENRON
                  Sent:   Thursday, December 06, 2001 6:39 AM
                  To:     Richey, Cooper
                  Subject:

                  I have a pair of shoe trees that are slightly too big for
   my
            shoes.
               Do
                  you
                  want a look.  I'd give them to you, but I need a pair
      myself,
         and
            I'm
                  cheap.
                  I suggest some sort of sale whereby we both win.  I sell
   you
         the
            new
                  shoe
                  trees for a discount (you win) and I use that money to
      finance
         my
                  purchase
                  (in turn receiving a discount on that pair).  What do you
      say
            bitch?

                  Jai Hawker
                  403-261-2259
                  Peters & Co. Limited

   **********************************************************************
               This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its
   relevant
            affiliate
               and
               may contain confidential and privileged material for the
   sole
      use
         of
            the
               intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or
         disclosure
            by
               others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
         recipient
            (or
               authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the
         sender
            or
               reply
               to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com
   and
         delete
               all
               copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments
   hereto)
         are
            not
               intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create
   or
            evidence
               a
               binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any
   of
         its
               affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party,
   and
      may
            not
               be
               relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel
   or
            otherwise.
               Thank you.

   **********************************************************************


The next scheduled Campaign Leadership call for Thursday, May 31 is being
rescheduled to Friday, June 1 @ 4:00 P.M.  The dial number of 1-800-283-1805
will remain the same.

These calls are mandatory so, in the future, if you are unable to participate
on the call, please let Rick or myself know.

Thanks!

gngr
713-853-7751


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 05/23/2000
06:28 PM ---------------------------

Keith Alan Baggerly <kabagg@stat.rice.edu>@stat.rice.edu on 05/23/2000
09:46:41 AM
Sent by: kabagg@stat.rice.edu
To: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
cc:
Subject: address

Vince,

thanks for chatting with me yesterday! Just a brief note
about info we talked about that I would find useful:
a) your papers
b) the latest version of Managing Energy Price Risk
c) data

thanks!
Keith

my address is:

Keith Baggerly
4038 Drummond
Houston, TX 77025


Hey Guys,

We are still not pulling the Intra-Cand-West-Phy book into the benchmark.  I
have talked to the systems administrator and he thinks it might be in how the
book is set up in the system.  I have attached below a copy of the screen
that shows how we have desigated the various codes for this book.  Please
look at this and verify that we have it set up properly.  If you have any
questions feel free to give me a call.

I am also attaching the detail that I pulled out of the GRMS system.  Please
take a look at it and help me identify what is causing our variances.  For
instance I am pulling a position of (245) contracts for July Price and you
show a position of long 241 contracts.

Thanks,
Robin
713-345-7478
---------------------- Forwarded by Robin Rodrigue/HOU/ECT on 06/21/2000
07:32 PM ---------------------------

Gary Stadler
06/21/2000 05:09 PM
To: Robin Rodrigue/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: