At Cle Dade's request, attached is a memo outlining the post-signing issues which we are aware remain to be addressed in connection with the HUB project (Enovate, L.L.C.).

Please call me at (713) 221-1131 with your questions or if I can be of any assistance regarding any of these issues.

Thanks.

Scott L. Miller
Bracewell & Patterson, L.L.P.
Phone (713) 221-1131
Fax (713) 222-3242
email:  smiller@bracepatt.com


any chance you'd be up for an 8K run on saturday?? only problem is that it
starts at 8:00am- too painful after your late night?? no obligation.....

At 01:37 PM 11/28/2000 -0600, you wrote:

Okay...My itinerary is as follows:? Arriving in San Diego 2:20 am Friday
night (I'll need your new address for the cab) and departing Sunday at 6:15
pm.? If you just want to leave the key under the mat that would be perfect
for me...I'll probably crash immediately anyway.? I am so excited to be
coming out there - -? I really need a break from Houston...not to mention
work.? The Gas Lamp district Saturday night sounds like fun and I would
love to meet your friends.? Also, please don't feel like you have to plan
the whole weekend, I have no problem going with the flow.

See you in a couple of weeks,
Susan


Please call him at home.  Thanks.

Regards,

Anita DuPont
Enron Research Group
713-853-0329
EB 1969


Dear Mr. Arora:

I wanted to thank you for taking the time to interview me this past
Wednesday.  I enjoyed meeting you and other representatives of the company
and left our interview with a much greater understanding of what drives
Enron and what the company seeks in its applicants.  Your responses to my
questions only confirmed my already high opinion of the company.

As you know, I am a first year student at Owen concentrating in Finance and
Electronic Commerce.  I graduated Summa Cum Laude from Bentley College in
May of 1997 with a Bachelor of Science degree in Economics & Finance, and I
received an Honors Certificate in Economics from the University of Cambridge
in August of 1995.

After graduating from Bentley, I worked for Digital Equipment Corporation as
an analyst in its Financial Development Program.  Most recently, I worked as
an investments analyst for Thomson Financial, where I evaluated three major
business development initiatives and five acquisition proposals totaling $44
million and worked with senior management on a takeover bid for one of
Thomson's key competitors.  I also performed strategic, market, and
competitor analysis, and proposed ways of improving the organization's
overall competitiveness.  My professional experiences working in the High
Technology and Financial Information Services industries have led to a
complete redefinition of my career goals.  I much prefer to be on the front
lines of business, helping some of the world's most established
organizations make decisions that will impact their financial future and
competitive position in the market.   I am anxious to begin my career with
Enron and believe that a relationship with company would prove mutually
beneficial.

In closing, I would like to thank you again for interviewing me in
Nashville.  If you have any questions, please contact via e-mail at
Ajay.Jagsi@owen2002.vanderbilt.edu or at (615) 673-0329.

Have a wonderful week!

Best Regards,

Ajay S. Jagsi


Currently the Northend temperatures show to drop from mid 30's Saturday to 19 degrees Sunday and 10 degrees for system weighted temperature for Monday and start back up into the high 20's and low 30's by Friday of next week. With these kind of temperatures and Redfield withdrawals falling off it is going to starting requiring more flow coming up from the south.I would recommend that we hold off and see what the end of next week looks like.

Gary

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Graves, Jerry
Sent:	Thursday, February 21, 2002 4:24 PM
To:	Bushton-Maintenance, Team; Bushton-Operations, Team; Schoolcraft, Darrell; Spraggins, Gary; January, Steve
Cc:	Peschka, Mike
Subject:	RE: Bushton Unit 31 Outage

Randy, the time table you have for this outage  is 02/26 to 02/28 to replace a section of the exhaust header. If we have cold temps the first part of the week, can this outage be pushed back a few days?

Jerry

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bushton-Maintenance, Team
Sent:	Thursday, February 21, 2002 3:22 PM
To:	Bushton-Operations, Team; Graves, Jerry; Schoolcraft, Darrell; Spraggins, Gary
Cc:	Bushton-Maintenance, Team; Peschka, Mike
Subject:	Bushton Unit 31 Outage

Attachment

Thanks
Randy Peschka

 << File: 31exhaustheader.doc >>


Mary

WELL!!! Welcome back to NE.  It will be good to see you at the ISO NE.

BEST

Richard

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Mary.Hain@enron.com [mailto:Mary.Hain@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2001 1:24 PM
To: David_Aamodt@pgn.com; dapnucc@teleport.com; dick@pnucc.org;
seabron.adamson@frontier-economics.com; Frank_Afranji@pgn.com; raa@vnf.com;
Joseph.Alamo@enron.com; ajaldrich@snopud.com; Jeff.Alexander@enron.com;
Al.Alexanderson@enron.com; Keonee.Almaida@enron.com;
hollis.alpert@ferc.fed.us; Brenda.Anderson@enron.com; angles@howry.com;
Alan.B.Aronowitz@enron.com; gdb@vnf.com; npbaker@bpa.gov; ellen@tca-us.com;
paulb@citizenspower.com; paulb@citizenspower.com; garybarbour@email.msn.com;
jbartus@cammckenna.com; glynda.becker@mail.house.gov;
Samuel.Behrends@enron.com; bbennett@bpa.gov; sberman@hewm.com;
ramsen.betfarhad@mail.house.gov; KBILAS@SKADDEN.COM; sbooye@Skadden.com;
raymond.r.boyce@state.or.us; tbradley@bracepatt.com;
scott.brattebo@pacificorp.com; sbrose@steptoe.com; sbuchheit@bracepatt.com;
alanb@wutc.wa.gov; Jim.Byrne@enron.com; vergil.cabasco@mail.house.gov;
johncameron@dwt.com; Doug.Carmichael@enron.com; Ed.Cassidy@enron.com;
ajchambe@llgm.com; Melissa.Chiechi@enron.com; elchristensen@snopud.com;
kevin.clark@ci.seattle.wa.us; rcloward@avistacorp.com;
david_cohen@rniinc.com; Bill.Comish@enron.com; Victor.Contract@enron.com;
powerlac@aol.com; Frederick.Coolbroth@enron.com;
michaelcorrigan@bchydro.bc.ca; kcorum@nwppc.org; KCurry@bracepatt.com;
wcurry@enron.com; gdahlke@paine-hamblen.com; kadaly@mcimail.com;
mday@gmssr.com; dearing@chelanpud.org; tdeboer@paine-hamblen.com;
Tom_Delaney@enron.com; sdleonard@earthlink.net; dldorrell@stoel.com;
Mary.Doyle@enron.com; Jay.Dudley@enron.com; mce2280@idahopower.com;
michaelearly@earthlink.net; Katherine.Edwards@enron.com;
rle@givenspursley.com; imaxtrans@aol.com; Chris.Elliott@enron.com;
sandra.elliott@ferc.fed.us; kerwin@ect.enron.com; dezickson@mwe.com;
Jim.Fallon@enron.com; fallonr@howrey.com; Elias.Farrah@enron.com;
Michele_Farrell@pgn.com; dfaulk@puget.com; gfergus@brobeck.com;
Willard.Fields@enron.com; sfisher@avistaenergy.com; pfox@bracepatt.com;
Pat.Franklin@enron.com; John.Frazzell@enron.com; ericf@prestongates.com;
don.furman@pacificorp.com; segfurst@bpa.gov; Jackie.Gallagher@enron.com;
craiggannett@dwt.com; Alvaro.Garcia@enron.com; sbishop@gibbs-bruns.com;
wgibson@nwppc.org; ggilbert@ci.tacoma.wa.us; Pat.Gilman@enron.com;
Alex.Goldberg@enron.com; jlgreene@energyadvocates.com;
Chris_Groener@mail.house.gov; Mary.Groggin@enron.com;
Mark.E.Haedicke@enron.com; Stephen.Hall@enron.com; steve.c.hall@enron.com;
Leo.Hamblin@enron.com; whannaford@NWPPC.org; jim.harding@ci.seattle.wa.us;
rhardy@hardyenergy.com; kharri@puget.com; Steve_Hawke@pgn.com;
dhawkins@caiso.com; marc.hellman@state.or.us; Scott.Helyer@enron.com;
mhenry@bracepatt.com; dwmp@teleport.com; rhornby@tca-us.com;
mhornst@aol.com; dhuard@jmbm.com; Marlene.Huntsinger@pgn.com;
cfi1@tca-us.com; Richard.Ingersoll@enron.com; pljacklin@stoel.com;
montrey@aol.com; danj@cfmdc.com; kgjohnson@bpa.gov; ljohnson@pwrteam.com;
Karen.E.Jones@enron.com; mkanner@kannerandassoc.com; karid@perkinscoie.com;
pkaufma@ect.enron.com; Paul.Kaufman@enron.com; Jeffrey.Keeler@enron.com;
Devon Kehoe; James.Keller@enron.com; Joe.Kelliher@mail.house.gov;
kkennedy@bdbc.com; Rick.Kessler@enron.com; rdking@bpa.gov;
Harry.Kingerski@enron.com; Harry.Kingerski@enron.com; rsk@schwabe.com;
gwilliams8@austin.rr.com; John.Klauberg@enron.com; Holli.Krebs@enron.com;
ekrogh@wiredweb.com; blafferty@avistacorp.com; wdlamb@bpa.gov;
John.Lamb@enron.com; Therese.Lamb@enron.com; srlarson@bpa.gov;
Cindy_Tatham@co.washington.or.us; zora.lazic@bchydro.com;
kaleathley@bpa.gov; pamela_lesh@pgn.com; Debi.LeVine@enron.com;
lcg@europa.com; doug.little@powerex.com; Robert.Loeffler@enron.com;
Chris.Long@enron.com; sjlong@bpa.gov; rlopezv@www.conet.com.mx;
david_lucio@iep.illinova.com; king.lum@bchydro.bc.ca;
kevin.lynch@pacificorp.com; Mark.Maehr@enron.com;
Randal.T.Maffett@enron.com; John.Malowney@enron.com; Sueyen.Mao@enron.com;
Susan.J.Mara@enron.com; Susan.J.Mara@enron.com; Lee.Martin@enron.com;
maurw@perkinscoie.com; Wayne.Mays@enron.com; Michael.McCall@enron.com;
Sandra.McCubbin@enron.com; Travis.McCullough@enron.com;
Michael.McDonald@enron.com; brugen@erols.com; mckinley@wpuda.org;
mcm@vnf.com; mcnichol@wapa.com; shauna@pnucc.org;
Maureen.McVicker@enron.com; pmeringolo@brobeck.com; demetcalf@bpa.gov;
cemeyer@bpa.gov; jmilegich@sppc.com; fred_miller@pgn.com;
Jeffrey.Miller@enron.com; jerry.miller@pacificorp.com;
Laura.Miller@enron.com; scott.miller@ferc.fed.us; Bill.Miner@enron.com;
phil_moeller@gorton.senate.gov; pmohler@hewm.com; emoler@velaw.com;
nkmorgado@bpa.gov; Mike@tonkon.com; krmoxness@bpa.gov;
mmps@millcreeklaw.com; pmurphy@mbllp.com; terrym@millcreeklaw.com;
bmurtha@acy.sunint.com; Rich.Nassief@enron.com; tod@mgninc.com;
Douglas_Nichols@pgn.com; Patty.Nichols@enron.com; Christi.Nicolay@enron.com;
tmnoguchi@bpa.gov; darcy@tonkon.com; Sarah.Novasel@enron.com;
Sarah.Novosel@enron.com; Tom.O'Donnell@enron.com; PObenchain@idahopower.com;
Pegy.Olds@enron.com; Carol.Opatrny@enron.com; tpaine@avistacorp.com;
Dave.Parquet@enron.com; bpascoe@mtpower.com; afpaschke@bpa.gov;
ccperigo@bpa.gov; wlpernas@stoel.com; lpeters@pacifier.com; jill@pnucc.org;
Mona.L.Petrochko@enron.com; npickover@bracepatt.com;
Phillip.Platter@enron.com; Alfred.Pollard@enron.com; Walt.Pollock@enron.com;
gporter@sppc.com; Kevin.M.Presto@enron.com; jquint@puget.com;
arlene.ragozin@ci.seattle.wa.us; maraschio@bpa.gov;
Dale.Rasmussen@enron.com; Scott.Rasmussen@enron.com; Bobby.Reeves@enron.com;
preiten@pngc.com; reyna2r@kochind.com; shellyr@pacifier.com;
Jeff.Richter@enron.com; raroach@bpa.gov; atrodrigues@bpa.gov;
rarogers@bpa.gov; peterroi@erols.com; Rothfelder@rlo-law.com;
Richard.Sanders@enron.com; jsaven@pacifier.com;
Michael.Schilmoeller@enron.com; jschlect@avistacorp.com;
Sabine.Schnittger@frontier-economics.com; Diana.Scholtes@enron.com;
Roger.Seifert@enron.com; Cara.Semperger@enron.com; asettanni@bracepatt.com;
Richard.Shapiro@enron.com; vsharp@enron.com; msmith1@enron.com;
Joshua.Sheinkman@enron.com; jshurts@nwppc.org; Sid@enron.com;
msizer@ci.tacoma.wa.us; slavens.paula@deps.ppl.com; small@wrightlaw.com;
small@wrightlaw.com; douglas.smith@ferc.fed.us; Mike.Smith@enron.com;
Roger.Smith@enron.com; Larry.Soderquist@enron.com; Harvey.Spigal@enron.com;
mstauffer@mtpower.com; James.D.Steffes@enron.com; James.D.Steffes@enron.com;
mestewardpsedc@worldnet.att.net; JKStier@BPA.gov;
rbstrong@paine-hamblen.com; DASwanstrom@Verner.com; Mike.Swerzbin@enron.com;
tabors@tca-us.com; Ron.Tapscott@enron.com; James.K.Tarpey@enron.com;
Jake.Thomas@enron.com; ryan_thomas@burns.senate.gov; jrt2058@idahopower.com;
maryann@pnucc.org; mtierney@sempra.com; robin_tompkins@pgn.com;
Ann.Tumlinson@enron.com; AW.Turner@enron.com; Sheila.Tweed@enron.com;
Lisa.Urick@enron.com; rvermeers@avistacorp.com; Frank.W.Vickers@enron.com;
John.Walley@enron.com; kristiwallis@sprintmail.com; walshl@howrey.com;
swalton@enron.com; Steve.Walton@enron.com; kaward@bpa.gov;
Kim.Ward@enron.com; Carol.Wardell@enron.com; dwatkiss@bracepatt.com;
sawatson@bpa.gov; judy.welch@NWPP.ORG; 211-6155@MCIMAIL.COM;
Kwenzel@zzz.com; cwestadt@sppc.com; Brian.Whalen@enron.com;
Bill.Williams@enron.com; klwmtp@worldnet.att.net; lyn_williams@pgn.com;
Greg.Wolfe@enron.com; Vickie.Wolk-Laniewski@enron.com; Ed.Wood@enron.com;
mwood@stoel.com; Steve.Wright@enron.com; Teresa.L.Wright@enron.com;
WSCC@enron.com; Charles.Yeung@enron.com; Christian.Yoder@enron.com;
Steven.J.Kean@enron.com; Steve.Kean@enron.com; Travel.in.the.Park@enron.com;
D.Brett.Hunsucker@enron.com; Carla.Hoffman@enron.com;
Bernadette.Hawkins@enron.com; Joe.Hartsoe@enron.com; Donna.Fulton@enron.com;
Roger.Fragua@enron.com; James.B.Fallon@enron.com;
Michael.Etringer@enron.com; Terry.W.Donovan@enron.com;
Stacy.Dickson@enron.com; Ginger.Dernehl@enron.com;
Rhonda.L.Denton@enron.com; Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com; Sean.Crandall@enron.com;
Tom.Briggs@enron.com; t.briggs@enron.com; Stacey.Bolton@enron.com;
dbenevid@enron.com; dbenevid@enron.com; Tim.Belden@enron.com;
Robert.Badeer@enron.com; Phillip.K.Allen@enron.com; Alan.Comnes@enron.com;
Lysa.Akin@enron.com; Portland.West.Desk@enron.com; assad@elektro.com.br;
Alan.Comnes@enron.com; Alberto.Levy@enron.com; Aleck.Dadson@enron.com;
Allison.Navin@enron.com; Amy.Fabian@enron.com; Barbara.A.Hueter@enron.com;
Bernadette.Hawkins@enron.com; Bill.Moore@enron.com;
cristinah@elektro.com.br; Carlos.Gustavo.Azevedo@enron.com;
Carmen.Perez@enron.com; Carolyn.Cooney@enron.com; Charles.Yeung@enron.com;
Chauncey.Hood@enron.com; Chris.Long@enron.com; Christi.L.Nicolay@enron.com;
Cynthia.Sandherr@enron.com; Damon.Harvey@enron.com; Dan.Staines@enron.com;
Daniel.Allegretti@enron.com; Dave.Mangskau@enron.com;
Donald.Lassere@enron.com; Donna.Fulton@enron.com; Eidy.Catala@enron.com;
Elizabeth.Linnell@enron.com; Frank.Rishe@enron.com;
Geriann.Warner@enron.com; Ginger.Dernehl@enron.com; Gisele.S.Braz@enron.com;
Gloria.Ogenyi@enron.com; Guillermo.Canovas@enron.com;
Harry.Kingerski@enron.com; Howard.Fromer@enron.com;
James.D.Steffes@enron.com; Janine.Migden@enron.com;
Javier.Pantoja@enron.com; Jean.R.Dressler@enron.com; Jean.Ryall@enron.com;
Jeff.Brown@enron.com; Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com; Jeffrey.Keeler@enron.com;
Joao.Paixao@enron.com; Joe.Allen@enron.com; Joe.Connor@enron.com;
Joe.Hartsoe@enron.com; Joe.Hillings@enron.com; Jose.Bestard@enron.com;
Joseph.Alamo@enron.com; Kathleen.Sullivan@enron.com; Kerry.Stroup@enron.com;
Kikumi.Kishigami@enron.com; Kirsten.Bellas@enron.com;
Lara.Leibman@enron.com; Laurie.Knight@enron.com; Leslie.Lawner@enron.com;
Linda.J.Noske@enron.com; Linda.Robertson@enron.com; Lindsay.Meade@enron.com;
Lisa.Yoho@enron.com; Lora.Sullivan@enron.com; Luiz.Maurer@enron.com;
Lysa.Akin@enron.com; Marchris.Robinson@enron.com; Marcia.A.Linton@enron.com;
Marcie.Milner@enron.com; Mary.Hain@enron.com; Maureen.McVicker@enron.com;
Melinda.Pharms@enron.com; Michelle.Belzak@enron.com;
Mona.L.Petrochko@enron.com; Nancy.Hetrick@enron.com;
Patrick.Keene@enron.com; Ray.Alvarez@enron.com;
Rebecca.W.Cantrell@enron.com; Ricardo.Charvel@enron.com;
Richard.Ingersoll@enron.com; Richard.Shapiro@enron.com;
Robert.Frank@enron.com; Robert.Hemstock@enron.com;
Robert.Neustaedter@enron.com; Robin.Kittel@enron.com;
Ron.McNamara@enron.com; rboston@enron.com; Rubena.Buerger@enron.com;
Sandra.McCubbin@enron.com; Sarah.Novosel@enron.com; Scott.Bolton@enron.com;
Sergio.Assad@enron.com; Stella.Chan@enron.com; Stephen.D.Burns@enron.com;
Steve.Montovano@enron.com; Steve.Walton@enron.com; Steven.J.Kean@enron.com;
Sue.Nord@enron.com; Susan.J.Mara@enron.com; Susan.M.Landwehr@enron.com;
Terri.Miller@enron.com; Thane.Twiggs@enron.com; Tom.Briggs@enron.com;
Tom.Chapman@enron.com; Tom.Delaney@enron.com; Tom.Hoatson@enron.com;
Tracy.Cooper@enron.com; Valeria.Lima@enron.com; Vinio.Floris@enron.com;
Xi.Xi@enron.com; Steven.J.Kean@enron.com; Jeffrey.Keeler@enron.com;
Christi.L.Nicolay@enron.com; Sarah.Novosel@enron.com;
Robert.Frank@enron.com; Lara.Leibman@enron.com; Gloria.Ogenyi@enron.com;
Richard.Shapiro@enron.com; Leslie.Lawner@enron.com; Paul.Kaufman@enron.com;
Aleck.Dadson@enron.com; Daniel.Allegretti@enron.com;
Howard.Fromer@enron.com; Joe.Hartsoe@enron.com; rboston@enron.com;
Janine.Migden@enron.com; Christie.Patrick@enron.com; Jane.Wilson@enron.com;
Rhonda.L.Denton@enron.com; kmagruder@newpower.com; scovino@newpower.com;
Rebecca.Carter@enron.com; Shelley.Corman@enron.com; Janet.Butler@enron.com;
Kevin.M.Presto@enron.com; Brad.Richter@enron.com; Greg.Piper@enron.com;
Kevin.McGowan@enron.com; Kim.Ward@enron.com; Leslie.Reeves@enron.com
Subject: I'm Leaving Enron

I am going to be the Senior Regulatory Counsel at ISO New England starting
on April 9, 2001.   My last day in the Portland area will be March 31,
2001.  I enjoyed working with you and wish you the best of everything.  My
new address will be:

Mary Hain
Senior Regulatory Counsel
ISO New England Inc.
One Sullivan Road
Holyoke, MA  01040-2841
(413) 535-4000
mhain@ISO-NE.com


Sean,

I recommend comming out for first 2-3 days.  My hunch is that diminishng returns will kick in after that.

Sarah offered to help set up meetings with FERC staff too; we could talk about that.

I'm still working on the reading materials.

GAC

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Novosel, Sarah
Sent:	Wednesday, October 03, 2001 3:25 PM
To:	Shapiro, Richard; Palmer, Mark A. (PR); Denne, Karen; Philipp, Meredith; Alamo, Joseph; Allegretti, Daniel; Allen, Joe; Alvarez, Ramon; Arefieva, Maria; Assaf, Lisa; Bellas, Kirsten; Benson, Eric; Bolton, Scott; Boston, Roy; Briggs, Tom; Buerger, Rubena; Burns, Stephen; Canovas, Guillermo; Cantrell, Rebecca W.; Comnes, Alan; Connor, Joe; Cooney, Carolyn; Dasovich, Jeff; Decker, Larry; Dernehl, Ginger; Dressler, Jean; Floris, Vinio; Frank, Robert; Fromer, Howard; Fulton, Donna; Guerrero, Janel; Hamilton, Allison; Hardy Jr, John; Hawkins, Bernadette; Hemstock, Robert; Hetrick, Nancy; Hoatson, Tom; Huang, Karen; Hueter, Barbara A.; Hunter, Bevin; Huson, Margaret; Ibrahim, Amr; Kaufman, Paul; Kean, Steven J.; Keene, Patrick; Kingerski, Harry; Kishigami, Kikumi; Knight, Laurie; Landwehr, Susan M.; Lassere, Donald; Lawner, Leslie; Leibman, Lara; Leonardo, Sam; Levy, Alberto; Lindberg, Susan; Linnell, Elizabeth; Mara, Susan; Maurer, Luiz; McVicker, Maureen; Migden, Janine; Miller, Terri; Montovano, Steve; Moore, Bill; Nersesian, Carin; Neustaedter, Robert; Nicolay, Christi L.; Nord, Sue; Noske, Linda J.; Ogenyi, Gloria; Palmer, Germain; Perez, Carmen; Perrino, Dave; Petrochko, Mona L.; Pharms, Melinda; Rishe, Frank; Rizzo, Helen; Roan, Michael; Robertson, Linda; Robinson, Marchris; Rodriquez, Andy; Ryall, Jean; Shelk, John; Shortridge, Pat; Staines, Dan; Steffes, James D.; Stransky, Joan; Stroup, Kerry; Sullivan, Kathleen; Sullivan, Lora; Thome, Jennifer; Tiberi, Fino; Twiggs, Thane; Walton, Steve; Warner, Geriann; Yeung, Charles; Yoho, Lisa
Cc:	Hiltabrand, Leslie; Radford, Pat
Subject:	RTO Week Panel Makeup
Importance:	High

We have learned (through EPSA -- no FERC issuance has been made yet) that FERC plans to have the follow panels for RTO Week, October 15-October 19:

Monday:	Market Design 			am
		Ancillary Services, etc.		pm

Tuesday:	Congestion Management	am
		Transmission Planning
		and Expansion			pm

Wednesday:	Standard Tariff			am
		Cost Recovery (license plate
		vs. postage stamp)		pm

Thursday:	States Representatives		am
		GISB/EISB/NERC		pm

Friday:		Market Monitoring		am
		Market Mitigation		pm

Attendance on these panels is by invitation only.  Invitations are being extended by FERC Staff now.

Please call me if you have any questions.

Sarah

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dernehl, Ginger   On Behalf Of Shapiro, Richard
Sent:	Wednesday, October 03, 2001 11:37 AM
To:	Palmer, Mark A. (PR); Denne, Karen; Philipp, Meredith; Alamo, Joseph; Allegretti, Daniel; Allen, Joe; Alvarez, Ramon; Arefieva, Maria; Assaf, Lisa; Bellas, Kirsten; Benson, Eric; Bolton, Scott; Boston, Roy; Briggs, Tom; Buerger, Rubena; Burns, Stephen; Canovas, Guillermo; Cantrell, Rebecca W.; Comnes, Alan; Connor, Joe; Cooney, Carolyn; Dasovich, Jeff; Decker, Larry; Dernehl, Ginger; Dressler, Jean; Floris, Vinio; Frank, Robert; Fromer, Howard; Fulton, Donna; Guerrero, Janel; Hamilton, Allison; Hardy Jr, John; Hawkins, Bernadette; Hemstock, Robert; Hetrick, Nancy; Hoatson, Tom; Huang, Karen; Hueter, Barbara A.; Hunter, Bevin; Huson, Margaret; Ibrahim, Amr; Kaufman, Paul; Kean, Steven J.; Keene, Patrick; Kingerski, Harry; Kishigami, Kikumi; Knight, Laurie; Landwehr, Susan M.; Lassere, Donald; Lawner, Leslie; Leibman, Lara; Leonardo, Sam; Levy, Alberto; Lindberg, Susan; Linnell, Elizabeth; Mara, Susan; Maurer, Luiz; McVicker, Maureen; Migden, Janine; Miller, Terri; Montovano, Steve; Moore, Bill; Nersesian, Carin; Neustaedter, Robert; Nicolay, Christi L.; Nord, Sue; Noske, Linda J.; Novosel, Sarah; Ogenyi, Gloria; Palmer, Germain; Perez, Carmen; Perrino, Dave; Petrochko, Mona L.; Pharms, Melinda; Rishe, Frank; Rizzo, Helen; Roan, Michael; Robertson, Linda; Robinson, Marchris; Rodriquez, Andy; Ryall, Jean; Shapiro, Richard; Shelk, John; Shortridge, Pat; Staines, Dan; Steffes, James D.; Stransky, Joan; Stroup, Kerry; Sullivan, Kathleen; Sullivan, Lora; Thome, Jennifer; Tiberi, Fino; Twiggs, Thane; Walton, Steve; Warner, Geriann; Yeung, Charles; Yoho, Lisa
Cc:	Hiltabrand, Leslie; Radford, Pat
Subject:	Teams for Upcoming FERC Proceedings

As you know, the Commission last week issued several important notices and papers regarding various policy initiatives that the Commission plans to address over the next few months.  These issues are extremely important to Enron and we have been urging FERC to address and resolve (most) of these issues for many years.  There is now a Commission in charge that looks like it is ready to act, and we need to be ready to respond.

In an effort to coordinate our efforts, we have developed coverage teams to respond to these FERC initiatives.  The Washington advocacy group will also work closely with all of these teams.  If someone is interested in a particular issue and was not included on that team, please feel free to call the Project Lead to have your name added to the team.  All assistance is welcome.  As you will see on the attached chart, many of the deadlines for responding to these initiatives are within the next few weeks, so the teams need to mobilize and establish a game plan for our responses very quickly.

On the attached chart, we have listed in the left column each of the FERC initiatives that will be starting or are currently underway.  A "Project Lead" has been named for each initiative.  The Project Lead will be responsible for developing and initiating a game plan for how Enron will respond in the proceeding.  The Team Lead will be contacting each of you within the next couple of days to set up processes and procedures for moving forward.  The team will be responsible for the initial determination of what issues should be addressed, what is the best way for Enron to respond to them, and producing draft comments.  Once draft comments are prepared, the comments will be circulated to a much wider group of Government Affairs and commercial people to ensure that the team has captured all of Enron's important issues.

There is a column of "Inside Counsel" and "Outside Services."  In some areas, we plan to use outside counsel or consultants and in others we do not.  Where we do not list outside counsel, we will rely on our inside counsel to draft the comments (with significant input from the team members).  Please remember, however, that even if outside services are listed, the RCR process must still be followed.  If applicable, Project Leads should submit the necessary RCR request as soon as possible.
The following is a brief description of each proceeding and the Project Lead named for each proceeding:

RTO Meetings and Comments to NOPR:  Sarah Novosel and Christi Nicolay will be the Project Leads in this proceeding.  The RTO meetings will be held in Washington from October 15-19, and we hope to have an executive from Enron make a presentation on one of the panels.  Comments will be submitted to FERC regarding the appropriate market design for RTOs.  This team will also be responsible for these comments.

Standards of Conduct NOPR:  Lisa Yoho will be the Project Lead.  Comments are due in approximately 45 days.  Several issues are raised in this proceeding, including a proposal to apply the standards of conduct to a utility's marketing affiliate buying and selling power to serve native load.  This is a significant action for FERC and we will strongly encourage the Commission to adopt this bold proposal.

ICAP Inquiry:  Christi Nicolay will be the Project Lead.  Chairman Wood has indicated that he is not very familiar with capacity and reserve requirements, whether they are needed, and what impact such requirements have on the market.  Enron has been a strong opponent of ICAP for many years, and we plan to show FERC that ICAP requirements are not needed.  We will submit expert testimony on this issue.
California Audit and Westwide Price Cap Mitigation:  Alan Comnes will be the Project Lead.  Commissioner Brownell is leading a FERC audit of the California ISO.  Although we do not have details of what the audit is intended to cover or how expansive it will be, we need to carefully monitor this proceeding and have input into the audit process where possible.  Furthermore, a request for rehearing is pending before the Commission regarding the current price cap mitigation measures.  The Commission implemented these caps in an effort to limit price spikes in California.  California's summer peaking season is over, but the Pacific Northwest's winter peaking season will be starting soon, and the mitigation measures currently in effect could discourage power sellers from selling power to the Northwest, where it will be needed this winter.  This team will be responsible for both of these proceedings.
Transmission Constraint and Energy Infrastructure Issues:  Steve Walton is the Project Lead.  FERC staff is studying two significant transmission constraints - California's Path 15 and the Central East Interface in New York  -- and plans to have the study completed later this year.  The Commission plans to forward the study to DOE.  The Commission stated that this is a high priority for it.  In a relating proceeding, the Commission has stated that it will hold four open meetings in different regions of the country to identify energy infrastructure issues.  The team will also oversee the progress in these proceedings.
Revised Public Utility Filing Requirements:  Susan Lindberg is the Project Lead.  The Commission has issued a NOPR proposing to require market participants to provide more information than is currently required, including at least seven additional data points per transaction.  This will have a significant administrative burden on Enron and could require the disclosure of commercially sensitive information.  Comments are due on October 5.
California Refund Proceeding:  Ray Alvarez is the Project Lead.  The Commission has ordered power sellers to pay refunds for sales made to the California ISO from October 2, 2000 through June 20, 2001, and has established a hearing proceeding to resolve issues of material fact.
Pacific Northwest Refund Proceeding:  Bob Frank is the Project Lead.  The Judge in this proceeding issued an initial decision recently finding that refunds are not warranted in the Pacific Northwest.  Briefs will be filed in response to the decision, and the Commission will review the Judge's order.
Midwest/Alliance RTO Proceeding:  Mike Roan is the Project Lead.  Various filings are pending before the Commission regarding establishment of two RTOs in the Midwest - the Alliance RTO and the Midwest RTO.  Enron is advocating, consistent with the Commission's recent pronouncements, one single RTO in the Midwest.  The Commission is expected to act on these filings shortly.  Proceedings may be ordered.
Northeast RTO Proceeding:  Sarah Novosel is the Project Lead.  Mediation to create a single Northeast RTO has concluded and the Judge's report is pending before the Commission.  A Commission order is expected on or before October 31.  Additional proceedings may be ordered.
Southeast RTO Proceeding:  Christi Nicolay is the Project Lead.  Mediation to create a single Southeast RTO has concluded and the Judge's report is pending before the Commission.  A Commission order is expected on or before October 31.  Additional proceedings may be ordered.

 << File: Coverage of Upcoming FERC Proceedings.doc >>


thanks for the update.


Sean,

A few comments.

1.  The counterparty to the Basic Documents is NBP, not NBILP
2.  There are three assignment and assumption agreements (I.C.)
 a.  NBP and ENA
                b. NBP, ECT-WR-Z, L.L.C. and ECT-WR-B, L.L.C.
               c.  NBP, ECT-PR-Z, L.L.C. and ECT-PR-B, L.L.C.
3.  I.E. and F. should be deleted.
4.  I.D. -  the Master Services Agreement is between ENA and NBP and has nine
service schedules
5.  On Third Party Consents, add the Release Agreement between Lost Creek and
ENA and the Release Agreement between Fort Union and ENA.
6.  Jason forwarded the NCO Omnibus Consent to Assignment this morning, add
that to the Third Party Consents.
7.  We are closing 20/20 prior to the Term Conversion on Lost Creek.
8.  Under other Closing Items, I want to talk to you about item F.  Consent
to Assignment for Fort Union.
9.  Under Other Closing Items, I think H and I can be deleted.  I don't know
what those are.
10.  Under the Basic documents, Administrative Services Agreement to be
executed by NBP and NBP Services Corporation.

	"Sean Bunk" <BUNKS@andrews-kurth.com>
	09/11/2000 12:08 PM

		 To: <sdaniel@enron.com>
		 cc: "HAL HALTOM" <HALTH@andrews-kurth.com>, "JASON PETERS"
<PETEJ@andrews-kurth.com>, "ROB TAYLOR" <TAYLR@andrews-kurth.com>
		 Subject: Project 20/20 Closing Checklist

Attached please find a draft of the Closing Checklist for Project 20/20.

The Closing Checklist currently includes alternate provisions depending on
whether the Closing Date of Project 20/20 occurs prior to or after the Term
Conversion of Wind River.  Please let me know if the checklist should be
revised to reflect the Closing Date occurring prior to the Term Conversion
Date.

Please feel free to call me at (713) 220-4427 if you have any questions or
comments or if I can be of further assistance.

S.B.

 - ClosingC.DOC


JMF,

Heads up for you on ERCOT-Imbalance deal 835169.1 from 10/24/01 had a price associated with it, I have zeroed out this out but thought you needed to know.

Thanks,
MJ


FYI - see below.

Belden is the King!
---------------------- Forwarded by John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron on 09/07/2000
07:26 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Tim Belden @ ECT                           09/06/2000 09:32 PM

To: John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron, Derek Davies/CAL/ECT@ECT, Rob
Milnthorp/CAL/ECT@ECT, John Zufferli/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Initial Thoughts On Alberta

As a result of meetings in Calgary last week, I have come up with the
following capabilities that we need to develop in Calgary to effectively
trade, schedule, and settle in that market.  I envision a series of
transition teams, organized by function, that are responsible for
transferring systems, knowledge, and people from the east and west power
desks up to the Calgary office.  These are my initial thoughts.  Things will
obviously change as we learn more about the market rules and when we get the
head of the desk in place.

Trading
Transition team - Tim Belden, Mike Swerzbin, Bill Greenizen
Hire head trader.  John L. and Tim are currently working with John Zufferli
to guage interest and come to terms on relocation.  John Z. is planning a
trip to Portland and Calgary as soon as he is able to fly.  Hopefully the
week of September 16th.
Get EOL products defined and posted.  Greenizen hopes to get this done by
September 16th.
Develop curves.  Currently using implied PPA bid curves.
Develop position reports.
Give offers to origination team.  Tim/Mike/Bill will provide prices to
origination until head trader has been hired.

Risk
Transition team - Monica Lande and Kathy ??
Kathy traveled to Portland on 9/5 and 9/6 to learn about our risk process and
book deals.
Book positions.  In process of entering five deals.  One for each unit, line
losses for each unit, and payment for the PPA.  Will run mini book to ensure
that close to zero value is created when all deals are booked and run against
our curves.  Should have this done by September 8th.
Drop curves.
Create position reports.

Scheduling
Transition team - Jeff Richter, Bill Greenizen, Peggy H.
Learn and define scheduling requirements in Alberta.
Learn about California scheduling systems.
Assess applicability of California scheduling systems to Alberta market.
Hire a scheduler.

Real Time
Transition team - John Forney
Assess whether we need to run real time group in Calgary.  We may be able to
start with someone on days and have nights and weekends covered from
Portland.  Legal issues with Portland providing service to Calgary.
Assuming we want a real time person in Calgary ... hire a RT trader/analyst.
We may be able to draw from Portland's real time desk for this.

Fundamentals
Transition team - Tim Heizenrader and Stephan ??, and Chris Wiebe
We can use the Portland fundamentals team to do much of the work before
January.  We have the systems and most likely the staff to come up with the
first generation of Alberta fundamentals.
Train a person who will eventually be located in Calgary on West Power
Fundamentals -- systems and processes.  Stephan or Chris W. may fit this
bill.  Must get buy in from Heizenrader and head trader.
We have a person in Houston, Sanjeev Khanna, who used to work for Enmax and
now works for structuring in Houston.  He is not interested in relocating to
Calgary, but would like to help us learn about the market.
Should consider trying to hire industry expertise from local utility.  Derek
will work on this.  Sanjeev may have some ideas here.
Establish better network connections between Portland and Calgary.  Dan
Dietrich.

Volume Management
Transition team - Murray O'Neil, Peggy H., Laura Scott
Learn market rules for settlements.  Get 1 person from Derek's group to try
to spell out the settlements formulas on both the pool side and the contract
side.
Compare Alberta Power Pool settlements procedures to California settlements
and determine whether Volume Management system will do the job.
Come up with a manual backup plan until VM system will work.
Hire someone to do volume management in Calgary.  We are currently assessing
whether anyone from Portland could do this job.

I will be out of the office until September 16th.  We have already made plans
for Bill G, Kathy, Peggy, and Laura to come to Portland to check out our
systems and processes.  Shortly after I return we should be able to nail down
the head trader position.  Tim Heizenrader will call Sanjeev to see if there
is a role for him to play in our Fundamental Analysis effort.  It may be
worth waiting until the head trader is in place to do this.

I'm off to Montana for a week.  Debra Davidson will be able to get in touch
with me.  She can be reached at 503-464-3820.

Regards,
Tim


FYI.  ILY.  JTW.

-----Original Message-----
From: Hotel Mozart [mailto:mozart@charmingrome.com]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 1:17 PM
To: John Watson
Subject: XMOZAX83274120 R: Checking availability

We regret that we are  unable to offer you any type of accomodation for the
period you require.
We hope however that www.charmingrome.com will be able to assist you in
finding suitable alternative accommodation for your holiday.
Thank you and best regards.
Hotel Mozart

-----


Daren,
Just following up on my email and call last week re: the CPI
information--just as soon as you can get that to me I will be able to get out
a revised draft. i know folks are anxious so let me know if there is someone
else you would like me to ask about this

Thanks for your help,
Sandi
----- Forwarded by Sandi M Braband/HOU/ECT on 11/14/2000 11:32 AM -----

	Sandi M Braband
	10/31/2000 02:14 PM

		 To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Tenaska Gas management Agreement

Daren,
Can you get me the specifics on the Consumer Price Index as you all would
like to see it referenced in the agreement. Is there a specific publication
that I can reference like I do for HSC proces in the first of the month
Inside FERC --let me know


This is to confirm the monthly Industrials meeting for Thursday June 22, 2000
at 1:00 pm.

  Date:  June 22, 2000
    Thursday

  Time:  1:00 pm

  Location: EB 3316

  Topic:  Industrials

If you have any questions/conflicts, please feel to call me at 853-0643.

Thanks,

Kay


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 03/20/2001
09:48 AM ---------------------------
From: Veronica Espinoza/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/20/2001 09:02 AM
To: Janie Aguayo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diane Anderson/NA/Enron@Enron, Derek
Bailey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jean Bell/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Patricia Boulanger/CAL/ECT@ECT, Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julie
Brewer/NA/Enron@Enron, Lesli Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate, Celeste
Cisneros/NA/Enron@Enron, Sharon Crawford/CAL/ECT@ECT, Richard
Deming/NA/Enron@Enron, Russell Diamond/ENRON@enronXgate, Cindy
Feldman/CAL/ECT@ECT, Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Veronica
Gonzalez/ENRON@enronXgate, Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Walter
Guidroz/ENRON@enronXgate, Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam
Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, Errol
McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Nidia Mendoza/ENRON@enronXgate, Tom
Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Bianca Ornelas/NA/Enron@Enron, Leslie
Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Dianne Seib/CAL/ECT@ECT,
Linda Sietzema/CAL/ECT@ECT, Kim S Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ellen
Wallumrod/NA/Enron@ENRON, Melinda Whalen/CAL/ECT@ECT, Tiffany
Williams/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Credit Report--3/20/01


keep up the good work!  Sue's got it covered.  But I'll be there soon enough.  You know, I just received this note.  Wonder if something's wrong with the network.

Best,
Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Denne, Karen
Sent:	Wednesday, October 10, 2001 4:40 PM
To:	Dasovich, Jeff
Subject:	RE:

always happy to oblige!  Shouldn't you be in Houston today???  Your absence is conspicuous (at least to me!)

:-) kd

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Wednesday, October 10, 2001 12:41 PM
To:	Denne, Karen
Subject:

Hey, I just peeked at our stock, and just wanted to say thank you.


Quick Inspirations 	 [IMAGE]  Home   [IMAGE]  Home  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]

[IMAGE] 	[IMAGE]   [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]    [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]        [IMAGE]  Thanksgiving is Thursday, November 22.   You're going to  be very happy you've asked us to email you updates.   We've  teamed with famous Proflowers.com to bring our fellow members "state  of the art" delivery of the freshest flowers anyone could ever  send.     Flowers  are the most civilized of all gifts and decorative items. Whether  you want to buy flowers for yourself or send them to someone you  care about, our relationship with Proflowers gives you twice the  freshness at half the price.   [IMAGE]For Thanksgiving, we're recommending one dozen elegant Autumn  Roses for  $29.99  plus FedEx delivery. And with each bouquet that  you send, Proflowers will include a complimentary  display vase.    Note this benefit!  Proflowers' unique "Direct from the grower" system lets  you enjoy a seven-day freshness guarantee ? quick delivery  when you've suddenly remembered you should have ordered flowers  (up to 10pm EST for next day) ? and automatic e-mail confirmations  that tell you exactly when your flowers are shipped and exactly  when they're delivered.   Send a beautiful  Proflowers arrangement now! You can send one of these beautiful  arrangements below:    Thanksgiving Bouquet with FREE Vase $39.99 plus delivery [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]       Autumn Roses with FREE Vase $29.99 plus delivery [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]       Sunflower Radiance with FREE Vase $29.99 plus delivery [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]              Want to see more? CLICK  HERE  to view all the beautiful bouquets Proflowers has to offer!   You can order for delivery up to 45 days in advance, but hurry  since this offer expires November 30, 2001.   Orders must be placed by noon pacific time (3 PM EST) on Tuesday, November 20 for guaranteed delivery before Thanksgiving.        Please Note: Prices do not include delivery charges. Offer expires  11/30/01. Special offers, coupons, or discounts cannot be used in  conjunction with other offers. Limit one promotion per order. Free  vase is only available with bouquets.       [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] Visit QuickInspirations.com  [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]     To unsubscribe from Quick Inspirations Special Offers Click Here   You received this email because you opted to receive the Quick Inspirations Newsletter through one of our valued partners.  If you believe you received this message in error or would no longer like to receive e-mail from  click here .  If you have any questions please email qi-help@quickinspirations.com  and a customer service representative will assist you    [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  	[IMAGE]

		[IMAGE]
[IMAGE] 	Quick Inspirations is Copyright ? 2001. All rights reserved.  [IMAGE] [IMAGE] 	[IMAGE]


Following please find the Daily EnronOnline Executive Summary.

EnronOnline Executive Summary for 10/17/00
Transaction Summary
External Transactions Today	3,197
Average Daily External Transactions (30 day Trailing Avg)	2,764
Total Life to Date Transactions	363,524

EnronOnline Daily % of Entity's Total Transactions for 	10/17/00
Enron North America	76%
Enron Europe Limited	39%
GLOBAL PRODUCTS	43%
Enron Metals	11%

EnronOnline Percentage of Total Corporate Transactions
(30 day Trailing Avg)	44%

Gross Notional Value of EnronOnline Transactions	Total
Today	2,100,566,938
MTD	23,053,391,246
LTD	191,745,625,517
Average Daily Notional Value (30 Day Trailing Avg)	1,851,062,340

Notional Revenue from Physical Flows to Date	13,577,949,136

Counterparties, Users, and Products Offered
Counterparties having transacted to date	518
New Counterparties transacting for the first time today	5
Number of Products Offered Today	1,221
Total Number of External Users Logged on Today	2,876
Average # of External Users logged on (30 day Trailing Avg)	2,526


Hey Mom,

The trip was fun but I lost $650.  It wasn't good for the wallet.  Vegas is a
fun weekend trip but I can't imagine staying longer than that.

How was your weekend?

-e

"K. Bass" <daphneco64@bigplanet.com> on 02/20/2001 08:41:20 AM
Please respond to "K. Bass" <daphneco64@bigplanet.com>
To: Eric Bass <Eric.Bass@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Hi

Hi Eric,
?
How was your trip?? Did you have a good time  and did you bring any money
home with you??
?
Have a good day.?  LU-M


Following please find the Daily EnronOnline Executive Summary.

Special Announcement! This report can now be accessed directly through the
EnronOnline Intranet Site at http://eolinfo.enron.com.

In order to access this report,  click on the link above. Once there, follow
the link entitled "Reports" and then select the "Secured Reports" tab. A
dropdown menu will appear with a list of the various secured reports
available for viewing. After choosing the report you are interested in, a
security window will appear requiring you to enter your Windows login ID and
password. Simply enter your standard login and the report will load
automatically.

We look forward to your feedback and comments. If you have any questions or
experience any difficulties accessing your reports through the Intranet Site,
please feel free to contact either Bryan Deluca at x36161 or Simone La Rose
at x31670.


Sent at the request of Dana Gibbs.  Please see the attachment.


Guys, I am getting the impression that we are having quality control issues -
it just sounds sloppy?  Am I wrong?  Do we need more focused resources?

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 06/15/2000
08:56 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Clay Spears                           06/14/2000 05:42 PM

To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janet R Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike J
Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert P Virgo/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jim Homco/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Doyle Undate

Unit 1 tripped today while running.  There is some kind of foreign object
loose in the unit.  It is unclear if the foreign object is in the compressor
section of the hot gas path section.  We will not know the cause or extent of
damage until the unit is boroscoped tomorrow.

Units 2 & 3:  Will be back in commercial operation tomorrow.  The team is
currently working on solutions to the demister.  No solution yet, but Unit 3
will return to commercial operation tomorrow.

Unit 4:  Emissions tuning continues.  The latest numbers are NOx 6 ppm, CO 50
ppm.

Unit 5:  To fire tomorrow and begin tuning.

Clay


Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 05/23/2001 09:10 AM -----

	"Chris Micheli" <cmicheli@carpentersnodgrass.com>
	05/23/2001 08:51 AM

		 To: "Susan McCabe" <smccabe@mccabeandcompany.net>, "Sue Mara"
<smara@enron.com>, "Steven Kelley" <steven@iepa.com>, "Steve Ponder"
<steve_ponder@fpl.com>, "Stephanie Newell"
<stephanie-newell@reliantenergy.com>, "Scott Sadler"
<sadlersa@earthlink.net>, "Scott Govenar" <sgovenar@govadv.com>, "Sandi
McCubbin" <smccubbi@enron.com>, "Ron Tom" <rtom@govadv.com>, "Roger Pelote"
<roger.pelote@williams.com>, "Robert Ross" <robbiz@cwo.com>, "Rina Venturini"
<rventurini@teamgsi.net>, "Richard Hyde" <rwhyde@duke-energy.com>, "Rachel
King" <rachel.king@elpaso.com>, "Phil Isenberg" <isenberg@hmot.com>, "Mike
Monagan" <mrmonagan@aol.com>, "Maureen O'Haren" <oharen@hmot.com>, "Marie
Moretti" <mmoretti@mccabeandcompany.net>, "Lynn Lednicky" <lale@dynegy.com>,
"Kent Palmerton" <kent.palmerton@williams.com>, "Katie Kaplan"
<kaplan@iepa.com>, "Kassandra Gough" <kgough@calpine.com>, "Julee Ball"
<jmball@ns.net>, "John Stout" <john_h_stout@reliantenergy.com>, "John Larrea"
<john.g.larrea@williams.com>, "Joe Ronan" <joer@calpine.com>, "Jeff Dasovich"
<jeff.dasovich@enron.com>, "Jean Munoz" <jmunoz@mcnallytemple.com>, "Jan
Smutny Jones" <smutny@iepa.com>, "Jack Pigott" <jackp@calpine.com>, "Hedy
Govenar" <hgovenar@govadv.com>, "Greg Blue" <gtbl@dynegy.com>, "Delaney
Hunter" <dhunter@s-k-w.com>, "Chuck Cole" <ccole@advocation-inc.com>, "Bev
Hansen" <bhansen@lhom.com>, "Anne Kelly" <kelly@hnks.com>, "Andy Brown"
<abb@eslawfirm.com>, "John Norwood" <janorwood@norped.com>, "Mohammed Alrai"
<mohammeda@calpine.com>, "Kent Robertson" <kentr@calpine.com>, "Katherine
Potter" <katherip@calpine.com>, "Juan Rodriguez" <juanr@calpine.com>, "Eileen
Koch" <eileenk@calpine.com>, "Bill Highlander" <highlander@calpine.com>,
"Barbara LeVake" <blevake@syix.com>, "Aymee Ramos" <aymeer@calpine.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Lockyer Fires Earthy Attack at Energy Exec

?

?http://www.latimes.com/news/state/20010523/t000043205.html
 - Lockyer Fires Earthy Attack at Energy Exec.url


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 01/30/2001
11:50 AM ---------------------------

"Scarbeko" <scarbeko@entropia.com.pl> on 01/29/2001 07:35:10 AM
To: <vkamins@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: praca dyplomowa V Edycja MBA Warszawa

Szanowny Panie Doktorze,
?
?
Na samym pocz?tku chciabym sic przypomnie+.  Jestem studentem V edycji MBA w ?Wy_szej Szkole Handlu i Finans?w  Micdzynarodowych w Warszawie i wraz z ?Panami Jerzym Seremakiem i Waldemarem  Mrozem piszemy u pana Doktora pracc ?dyplomow? z finans?w  micdzynarodowych. Nsze prace przesaem do Pana Doktora ?juz w listopadzie  ubiegego roku i do tej pory nie dostaem potwirerdzenia, ?_e Pan je otrzyma.  Bardzo bym prosi o potwierdzenie otrzymania tych_e prac ?lub zaprzeczenie.  ?Panie Doktorze nastepna sprawa dotyczy zapytania  czy Pa?stwa Firma byaby
zainteresowana inwestycjami w budow? elektrowni na  Ukrainie. Pracujc w
firmie konsultingowej kt?ra zajmuje sic min. tego  typu biznesem. Nie jest to
dla nas pierwszy kontakt z tego rodzaju inwestycjami,  poniewa_ w obecnej
chwili przygotowujemy sie do kontraktu? z  niemieck?? firm? Lahmeyer
International na budowc elektrowni 150 MW  Szczeg?ly moge podac je_eli
Panstwo wyrazicie  zainteresowanie.
?
Z powa_aniem Tomasz  Bach?


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/31/2000
04:04 PM ---------------------------

Jim Dyer <Jim.Dyer@bus.utexas.edu> on 03/31/2000 03:11:37 PM
To: "'Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com'" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Presentation at UT

Vince,

 I appreciate your response to my request for you to speak to my
class on real options.  I thought you might enjoy the following exchange of
emails that occurred yesterday.  Perhaps some of these issues could be
addressed in your talk.

 Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: Sheridan Titman
Sent: Friday, March 31, 2000 9:11 AM
To: Jim Dyer
Subject: RE: Real Options Course Feedback

Jim:

Your student has raised some difficult questions.  I would recommend Ehud,
but I thought that the finance people have the answers in cases with
complete markets and that we rely on the decision science people for cases
with incomplete markets.

If it would help, I can come in at 6pm after my class in a couple of weeks.

Sheridan

Sheridan Titman
Department of Finance
College of Business Administration
University of Texas
Austin, Texas 78712-1179

512-232-2787 (phone)
512-471-5073 (fax)

titman@mail.utexas.edu

-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Dyer
Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2000 4:37 PM
To: Sheridan Titman
Subject: RE: Real Options Course Feedback

Sheridan,

 Which of your classes do you want to miss?  Just kidding.  Actually
you probably told me that before.  Can you suggest someone else who would be
a good choice to discuss the use of option theory in the context of
incomplete markets, and to address some of the types of questions raised in
the note from the student?

 Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: Sheridan Titman
Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2000 5:58 PM
To: Jim Dyer
Subject: RE: Real Options Course Feedback

Jim:

I teach at the same time as you do.

Sheridan

Sheridan Titman
Department of Finance
College of Business Administration
University of Texas
Austin, Texas 78712-1179

512-232-2787 (phone)
512-471-5073 (fax)

titman@mail.utexas.edu

-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Dyer
Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2000 11:32 AM
To: Sheridan Titman
Subject: FW: Real Options Course Feedback

Sheridan,

 See the comments below.  I don't mean to put you on the spot, and
have not announced anything in class, but I am hoping that you could visit
my class for about an hour one Thursday afternoon to discuss your views
regarding applications of option pricing concepts to "real options".  As a
reminder, I've attached a course outline.  Chris Kenyon from Schlumberger is
speaking on April 13, and Vince Kaminski has tentatively agreed to speak on
April 20.

 I am going to be out of town on April 27, so that leaves either next
Thursday (April 6) or May 4.  Would either of those times work for you?  I'm
not thinking of any preparation, but more of an informal discussion of the
"philosophical issues" related to real options work.

 Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Dyer
Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2000 1:24 PM
To: 'jclevenger@optionii.bus.utexas.edu'
Subject: RE: Real Options Course Feedback

Josh,

 Some very thoughtful observations.  As you know, I had invited one
finance professor to our class on Arundel, but he was out of town.  I do
plan to invite Sheridan Titman to discuss the issue of using the option
models in situations where there is no underlying security that is traded.
I do think it is important to face that issue, which is actually covered at
a theoretical level in our last couple of readings.

 The issue of volatility is also an excellent issue for further
discussion, as you suggest.  So far, we've been looking at cases where
volatility is "given".  The problem of finding an "objective" measure of
volatility for a project reminds me of the problem of finding the correct
risk adjusted discount rate, which is not surprising since the concepts are
almost two sides of the same plate.  One approach, of course, is to do some
modeling using traditional decision analysis tools, including subjective
probabilities, but the finance people who write options articles don't like
to think  about such ideas.

 I'll try to address these issues in more detail as the semester
continues.  I think it was important to surface some of these points early,
and to come back to them after we have seen how to apply the methods in a
naive sort of way.

 Thanks for the feedback and comments.

 Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: jclevenger@optionii.bus.utexas.edu
[mailto:jclevenger@optionii.bus.utexas.edu]
Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2000 8:42 AM
To: Jim.Dyer@bus.utexas.edu
Cc: josh-clevenger@reliantenergy.com
Subject: Real Options Course Feedback

After overcoming the initial (I hope) overload of materials and tools
presented
thus far in the semester, it appears to me that you are achieving the
objective
of making us comfortable with optionality valuation as applied to a variety
of
problems which are outside the borders defined by a liquid market of traded
financial elements.

As a constructive feedback, you have been forthright with us in marking off
areas of this subject which are still controversial.  I also realize that
rightly so, real-world application of this type of analysis without a robust
understanding of finance may degenerate into a succession of assumptions
that
result in a "house of cards" effect.  My opinion at this point is that two
issues are of potentially "make-or-brake" importance if I am to persuade my
superiors to accept these methods for valuations outside the realm of
projects
whose value is primarily driven by the value of commodities backed by
financial
instruments.  These issues are easy to guess:

1)  Discounting and Risk Free rates:  I do not sense that anyone in the
class
has put forth convincing arguments as to the proper application of time
value
questions in the absence of liquidity.  Is there someone within the finance
department that can present a firmer position on this question?

2)  Volatility: I found Winston's examples on this metric succinct.  I would
recommend that in future years you dedicate some hours of class time to this
subject.  My criticism again relates to messy problems.  I anticipate
arguments
against real option applications based on the dispute of volatility
measures.
If I were a conservative financial manager, I would argue that:

*** Two-a: implied volatility derived from an industry specific slice of
equity
options is a shotgun approach -- the projects being valued are of a tranche
which may in fact have a significantly different outcome variance than the
weighted average measured by the equities utilized.  Oil, gas and electricty
are
good examples the major players are competing on many different levels of
the
value chain. Smaller companies do exist which are dedicated to one strata,
but
what about projects that want to exploit opportunies across strata in a
vertically integrated company?

*** Two-b: based on the following skepticism - if a real option value is
being
proposed for a new business venture (some new unexploited opportunity,)
there is
some paradox embedded in the increased value based on high volatility in new
ventures and the high risk of failure.  This skepticism is likely to be less
acute in high-tech sectors where the huge upside of new ventures is paraded
before us daily by NASDQ touts.  It is a much harder sell to "mature"
industries.

Of particular interest in the power industry are investments centered around
opportunities arising from restructuring of electricity and natural gas
sectors
as regulation is removed.  A large proportion of the risk is embedded in
ongoing
changes of public policy on an international basis.  As an intentionally
screwed-up example, can anyone other than a financial genius correctly asses
volatility for U.S. companies investing in seed projects in Mexico based on
speculation of the inevitable dismantling of the national utility (CFE) and
PEMEX?

James S. Dyer
Fondren Centennial Chair in Business
Department of Management Science and Information Systems
CBA 5.202
The University of Texas at Austin
Austin, Texas 78712-1175

Email:  j.dyer@bus.utexas.edu
Telephone:  512-471-5278
Fax:  512-471-0587


http://www.msnbc.com/news/729361.asp

Playboy seeks 'Women of Enron'

Magazine invites current and former employees to pose

ASSOCIATED PRESS

HOUSTON, March 25 - Playboy is hoping to entice some of the women who lost
their shirts in the Enron scandal to reveal a little bit more.

THE MAGAZINE IS putting together a "Women of Enron" pictorial and is
inviting employees past and present to send snapshots of themselves in
bikinis if they wish to pose.

       "This is an opportunity for them to do something fun in the midst of
the turmoil that's going on in their lives. These are women who are out of a
job," Playboy spokeswoman Elizabeth Norris said. "We are offering what you
could view as a part-time job, or what might turn into a new career."

       Plenty of women at the heart of scandals have appeared on Playboy's
pages, including televangelist mistress Jessica Hahn.

       "That's rich," said Deborah DeFforge, co-chairwoman of the Severed
Enron Employees Coalition. "We've had so much depressing news or stressful
news, and then to all of a sudden come up with something like that, it's
kind of cute."

       DeFforge said she would not pose, but added: "I'm sure there are some
in the younger set who would be perfect."


Thanks for the update.  I want to make sure we present the numbers in a more
coherent fashion than just laying out the individual RCs.  You and I have
discussed this before; my recollection is that we were going to break out as
follows:

Administrative services
Aviation
building services
new building
ongoing
government affairs
Americas
Europe-Asia
Other budgets retained at business unit level
(explanation of shift in expenses from advocacy to transaction support/risk
management
PR/Communications
Brand advertising
internal comm
other PR

I may be forgetting some of the subgroups we talked about, but this is the
general idea.

	Elizabeth Linnell
	Sent by: Elizabeth Linnell
	10/18/2000 11:00 AM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: meeting with Mark Lindsay

I wanted to update you on my conversation this morning with Mark Lindsay
regarding next week,s budget meeting.

The format will be similar to last year,s.  We,ll be receiving from Mark,s
group a consolidated spreadsheet of all of our budgets, grouping them by
functionality and illustrating 2000 plan, 2000 estimate, and 2001 plan, and
the variances between.  We will be covering the EPSC and Aviation budgets
during the same meeting.  Billie and I will get together on Friday to compare
what the two of us have so far, and then we have a meeting set up for Monday
morning with you, Bill, Billie and me to go over everything in advance of
Tuesday,s meeting.

Points that Mark made (no surprises here):
-  Jeff has mentioned that he wants to see reductions in all corporate cost
centers since our international activities look like they,re going away.  (We
have made significant reductions year to year on our international gov,t
affairs and PR budgets, and I think we can justify that the other cost
centers are primarily focused on domestic activities while the individual
business units budget much of those activities themselves.)
-  Even though we,re allocating more overall to the business units this year,
Jeff will be interested in the gross budget numbers, before any allocations.
-  We need to be able to explain any significant budget changes year to year
 -  Mark particularly emphasized the increase in the PR budget, most of which
is retained at Corp anyway
 -  We need to be able to explain anything that we,ve inherited from the
business units that is now staying at Corp.  This  applies to the headcount
that we,ve picked up from ENA and from Int,l (Dennis, group).

Lindsay mentioned that there,s a possibility that Causey may, in advance of
our Tuesday meeting, meet by himself with Skilling to get a general idea of
where Jeff stands on the corporate budgets as they,ve been submitted so far,
and then come back to us with instructions on any changes that need to be
made.  If this is the case, we may have to make cuts before we get to present
our case.

I'm working on our presentation based on that conversation and will forward
it to you as it progresses.


Muchas Gracias Senorita!
the memo that he sent out has been helpful -it just didn't include all the
Units that we've needed -I printed it off and have it on my desk to reference
whenever.  So, thank you for that!

   Kate Symes @ ECT                04/18/2001 10:23 AM

To: Kimberly Hundl/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Unit Contingent Deals

582324 - Grays Harbor Paper Mill
582322 - Las Vegas Cogeneration

I've added the unit names to the deals and reminded Les that they need to be
in the comments section. He was under the impression that the guideline sheet
he sent out re: unit names spelled out the answers, but I took another look
at it and it doesn't seem to really answer anything. I've attached it just in
case you don't have it anymore - but please let me know if this assists you
guys in ANY way. If it doesn't, I can probably get him to draw up something
more useful.

Thanks,
Kate

From Les Rawson:

Here's the list of current Service's Desk customers we sell as Unit
Contingent. We want to confirm the sales but not the purchases.

Lv Cogen. located within Nevada Power service territory.

Unit ID: LV Cogen. unit located in North Las Vegas

Could be sold at Nevada Power system, Mead 230, Navajo, McCullough, Red Butte.

Saguaro Power Company located within Nevada Power service territory.

Unit ID: Saguaro Power unit located in Henderson Nevada.

Sale Points: Nevada System, Mead 230, Navajo, McCullough, Red Butte.

Grays Harbor Paper L.P. located in BPA service territory. Behind Grays Harbor
PUD.

Unit ID: Grays Harbor Paper unit located in Haquiam, WA.

Sale Points: Entire Northwest interconnect.

Willamette Ind. located in PacifiCorp's service territory.

Unit ID; Willamette Ind. Albany Paper mill, located in Albany, Or.

Sale Points: Entire Northwest interconnect.


Brian Stone
J.M. Huber

At the request of Gerald Nemec, I am forwarding to you the attached Master
Firm Purchase/Sale Agreement--Sample Contract for review.

Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions and or comments
regarding this matter.

Regards,
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Stacey,

Check it out!!
http://www.hyatt.com/usa/santa_fe/hotels/hotel_tamay.html

Looks like fun!! I would be happy to coordinate this for you!! (wink, wink)

: ) Heather


Outlook Migration Team@ENRON
04/30/2001 02:44 PM
To: Ann Vaughn/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Wilson Barbee/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Estalee Russi/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Felicia Beal/OTS/Enron@Enron, Fran
Fagan/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Gary P Smith/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Jerry
Harkreader/OTS/Enron@ENRON, John Anderson, Jorge Olivares/OTS/Enron@ENRON,
Kristin Passmore/OTS/Enron@Enron, Leesa Hutcherson/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Michele
Denby/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Miranda Southard/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Renee
Pena/OTS/Enron@Enron, Rita Houston/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Roger
Sumlin/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Wilford Dodd/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, William
Keeney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brad Alford/NA/Enron@Enron, Bruce
Golden/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Bryan Williams/NA/Enron@Enron,
Carl Tricoli/Corp/Enron@Enron, Christopher Coffman/Corp/Enron@Enron, Chu Chu
Wang/Corp/Enron@Enron, Charles Ward/Corp/Enron@ENRON, W David
Duran/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Marks/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Rhodes/NA/Enron@Enron,
Farouk Lalji/HOU/ECT@ECT, George Schaefer/HPL/Enron@Enron, Greg
Blair/Corp/Enron@Enron, Greg Martin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Hoover/HOU/ECT@ECT,
John Moore/Corp/Enron@Enron, Lisa Zarsky/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mario
Alonso/NA/Enron@Enron, Michael Miller/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Mitch
Robinson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Naveed Ahmed/NA/Enron@Enron, Paulita
Olvera/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tina Holcombe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tina Rode/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tosha
Henderson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrea Ring/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brad McKay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris
Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Judy Townsend/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly Bates/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Peter F Keavey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sandra F Brawner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sean
Boyle/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Susan W Pereira/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victoria
Versen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vladi Pimenov/NA/Enron@Enron, Derek Anderson/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Susan Huston/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Burak Hurbas/NYC/MGUSA@MGUSA, Colin
Crowley/NYC/MGUSA@MGUSA, Lisa Rizzo/NYC/MGUSA@MGUSA, Richard Johnson, Sandra
Torres/NYC/MGUSA@MGUSA, Angela Stie/NA/Enron@Enron, Armando
Lira/ENRON@enronXgate, Audry O'Toole/NA/Enron@Enron, Beverly
Filer/NA/Enron@ENRON, Helen M Jeschke/HOU/ECT@ECT, John H
Harrison/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kristi I Louthan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael
Philips/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peggy Rathmell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Regan
Jr/NA/Enron@Enron, Shannon Cobb/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sharon
Stringfellow/HOU/ECT@ECT, Valarie Curry/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: 2- SURVEY/INFORMATION EMAIL 5-03-01

Current Notes User:

To ensure that you experience a successful migration from Notes to Outlook,
it is necessary to gather individual user information prior to your date of
migration.  Please take a few minutes to completely fill out the following
survey.  When you finish, simply click on the 'Reply' button then hit 'Send'
Your survey will automatically be sent to the Outlook 2000 Migration Mailbox.

Thank you.

Outlook 2000 Migration Team

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------

Full Name:        Chris L Germany

Login ID:   cgerman

Extension:   3-4743

Office Location:   EB3224b

What type of computer do you have?  (Desktop,  Laptop,  Both)  desktop

Do you have a PDA?  If yes, what type do you have:   (None, IPAQ, Palm Pilot,
Jornada)  Palm V

Do you have permission to access anyone's Email/Calendar?
    If yes, who?  no

Does anyone have permission to access your Email/Calendar?
    If yes, who?  Kimberly Bates

Are you responsible for updating anyone else's address book?
    If yes, who?  no

Is anyone else responsible for updating your address book?
    If yes, who?  no

Do you have access to a shared calendar?  no
    If yes, which shared calendar?

Do you have any Distribution Groups that Messaging maintains for you (for
mass mailings)?
    If yes, please list here:  no

Please list all Notes databases applications that you currently use:  1)
Global Facility Maintenance  2) ECT for sale

In our efforts to plan the exact date/time of your migration, we also will
need to know:

What are your normal work hours?  From: 7:15am      To: 4:45PM

Will you be out of the office in the near future for vacation, leave, etc?
Yes       If so, when?        From (MM/DD/YY):      To (MM/DD/YY):
5/2/01 - 5/4/01  leaving 1:30PM on 5/2/01


---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 01/29/2001 04:05 PM
---------------------------

"Heather.L.Pinkerton-1" <Heather.L.Pinkerton-1@ou.edu> on 01/29/2001 03:16:44
PM
To: Sally.Beck@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Re: Dinner Invitation

Dear Mrs. Beck,

Thank you very much for the invitation.
I'm excited to tour Enron field because even though I am from Houston, I have
yet to attend an Astro's game.  I look forward to attending, and I thank you
for supporting our Energy Management program at OU.

Sincerly,
Heather Pinkerton

Sally.Beck@enron.com wrote:

> (See attached file: OU Invitation.pps)
>
>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                         Name: OU Invitation.pps
>    OU Invitation.pps    Type: POWERPNT File (application/pps)
>                     Encoding: base64


You asked; we answered.  Many of you shared your ideas with us about what you
think will make the New Peoplefinder a better information resource.  You
suggested that we add aliases (AKAs) and fax, pager, and cell numbers.  We
did.  Keep sending us your good ideas, click "Contact us" on peoplefinder.

Thanks for your support.

The Vision and Values Task Force

P.S. Did you update your data on eHRonline yet?


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 05/31/2001 01:39 PM -----

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	05/31/2001 10:30 AM

		 To: skean@enron.com, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Janel Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Susan M
Landwehr/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Michael
Tribolet/ENRON@enronXgate, Paul Kaufman/Enron@EnronXGate, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Core/Noncore Plan Hits the Papers

Plan would have biggest customers pay Edison's debt
Greg Lucas, Sacramento Bureau Chief
Thursday, May 31, 2001
,2001 San Francisco Chronicle
URL:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2001/05/31/M
N231235.DTL
Sacramento -- Legislative leaders are drafting a new rescue plan for Southern
California Edison that would put the utility back on its feet financially at
the expense of its biggest customers.
The plan would leave manufacturers, refineries and other big industrial
customers with the burden of paying nearly all the utility's $3.5 billion
back debt through a dedicated charge. Residential and small commercial users
would be on the hook for only a fraction of the back debt.
Big users say it is unfair to saddle them with all of Edison's debt, but
supporters of the plan say it's these users that wanted deregulation and
should shoulder the costs it created.
"We're trying to put something together in a way that solves all these
problems, and if people are to be pigheaded about it, we won't solve any
problems," said Assemblyman Fred Keeley, D-Boulder Creek (Santa Cruz County).
Although the plan is an alternative to Gov. Gray Davis' proposed deal to put
Edison back on its feet financially, it could be used as a model to help
restore Pacific Gas and Electric Co. to solvency.
Democrats say the plan contains some elements desired by Republicans, but GOP
lawmakers object to saddling large business users with Edison's debt.
The plan is based on the way gas customers are divided into "core" and
"noncore" users.
SEPARATING 'CORE' USERS
Under this proposal, electrical users would be divided the same way. Core
users would be customers who use 500 kilowatts or less a month. Noncore would
be those using more than 500 kilowatts.
Out of Edison's 4.2 million customers, only 3,600 would be noncore customers.
But those 3,600 customers use about 26 percent of Edison's demand for energy.
Core customers would get their power from generators owned by Edison, long-
term contracts and alternative energy producers, such as wind farms and solar
panels, on contract with the utility.
That would mean those customers would no longer be subject to the whims of
the spot market, which has far higher prices than other sources of
electricity.
Large users, the noncore customers, would be given the right to negotiate to
buy their power directly from generators or build on-site power plants to
make themselves energy self-sufficient.
The plan would be phased in through January 2003 to give large energy
customers time to prepare for buying power on the open market.
During that period, residential, small business and large industrial users
would all share in paying off Edison's debt. But in 2003, that burden would
shift exclusively to the big users.
Republican lawmakers and those same large users have been clamoring to be
given what is called "direct access" to generators so they can negotiate
cheaper rates.
Enron is also backing the idea of cutting loose the largest electricity users
because that would create a built-in market for the energy the company sells.
Large users who want to remain on the grid could do so.
EDISON 'ENCOURAGED'
Sources said Edison officials met with lawmakers over the weekend to iron out
details of the plan.
A spokesman for Edison said he was "encouraged" by the talks.
"I haven't seen a finished product or a plan," said Bob Foster, a senior vice
president with Edison. "They're approaching this in a spirit of goodwill and
trying to find a solution."
Big businesses complain that the plan does not work because right now, there
is nowhere they can buy cheap electricity.
"We're very concerned that separating the core from the noncore means we will
experience extreme rate hikes over the next two years," said D.J. Smith, a
lobbyist for the California Large Energy Consumers Association.
"When you add blackouts, the multiple interruptions of production and another
potentially huge rate hike, the result would be catastrophic to the economy,"
Smith said.
Added Dorothy Rothrock, a lobbyist for the California Manufacturers and
Technology Association: "What's the rationale for the noncore to be paying
the entire Edison undercollection? It sounds to me like just pure politics.
They don't want voters to pay because they vote."
CONSUMER ADVOCATE SMELLS A RAT
Harvey Rosenfield, head of the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights,
said he thought the plan would eventually turn into a bailout as business
interests muscle lawmakers into pushing some portion of Edison's debt onto
residential and smaller commercial customers.
"I think it's a trick. We've seen this same tactic used at the Public
Utilities Commission, where what were supposed to be rate increases for big
business end up costing more for residential and small businesses,"
Rosenfield said.
The new plan also does not include the outright purchase of Edison's part of
the transmission system that loops electricity around the state.
Davis backs buying the lines for $2.7 billion. Democrats have insisted that
for the state's financial help, taxpayers receive something of value.
Republicans have insisted that they will back no proposal that includes state
purchase of transmission lines.
In the new proposal, the state would have a five-year option to buy the
transmission lines for $1.2 billion -- the book value of the asset.
In addition, the utility would make $1.5 billion available to the state to
either purchase other assets -- such as Edison's hydroelectric facilities,
for example -- or use it in partnership to build new power plants.
E-mail Greg Lucas at glucas@sfchronicle.com.
,2001 San Francisco Chronicle ? Page?A - 5


Steve,

FYI

Vince


.subMenuLink { COLOR: #006666; FONT-FAMILY: Times New Roman; TEXT-DECORATION: none } .subMenuLink:hover { COLOR: #660000; FONT-FAMILY: Times New Roman; TEXT-DECORATION: underline }
					[IMAGE]
[IMAGE] 	 	[IMAGE] 	 	[IMAGE]  	[IMAGE]
					[IMAGE]
					[IMAGE][IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]
					[IMAGE]home

[IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE][IMAGE]	    Sarah -   Wow! It's a good  thing we evaluated the diversification of your overall  investment portfolio. Withdrawing funds last fall really threw your  portfolio out of proper allocation. You currently have a large  portion of your portfolio in one asset class...U.S. large cap  stocks. No harm done in the short term, the long term could be a  different story, however.   We would like to see you  move your Coopers account to TD Waterhouse. Is that  possible? As you know the selection of funds is much broader, and we  could do a much better job of allocating your funds. We're having a hard  time making the portfolio "work" with the limit selection Coopers has  available. It would make sense to move Mark's Duke account to TDW, as  well.   Let me know what you and Mark think  of the idea.    James R. Waters, CFP  PARTNERSINWEALTH  3400 Bissonnet? Suite 145 Houston, TX 77005-2153 713.964.4028  phone 713.963.2977  fax jrw@partnersinwealth.com www.partnersinwealth.com


Hadn't seen this before - thought it might be a good quiz for
meetings/trainings.   -cara
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jaine E Perlman [SMTP:jperlman@eden.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 1994 9:50 PM
> To: Sharon Perlman; Russ Perlman; Dave J. Perlman; Ed Broderick; Caryn
> Brenner; Cara White; Karen Schwartz; Heidi Schultz; Becca Bruce; Sarah
> Andre
> Subject: Fw: Let's see who is "professional"
>
>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Subject: Professionalism Quiz
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >  > The following short quiz consists of 4 questions and tells
> > > > whether you are truly a "professional".
> > > > > > >  >
> > > > > > >  > Scroll down for the answer.
> > > > > > >  >
> > > > > > >  > The questions are not that difficult.
> > > > > > >  >
> > > > > > >  > 1. How do you put a giraffe into a refrigerator?
> > > > > > >  >
> > > > > > >  >
> > > > > > >  >
> > > > > > >  >
> > > > > > >  >
> > > > > > >  >
> > > > > > >  >
> > > > > > >  >
> > > > > > >  >
> > > > > > >  >
> > > > > > >  > The correct answer is: Open the refrigerator, put in the
> > > giraffe
> > > and close the door. This question tests whether you tend to do simple
> > > things in an
> > > > > > >  > overly complicated way.
> > > > > > >  >
> > > > > > >  >
> > > > > > >  > 2 How do you put an elephant into a refrigerator?
> > > > > > >  >
> > > > > > >  >
> > > > > > >  >
> > > > > > >  >
> > > > > > >  >
> > > > > > >  >
> > > > > > >  >
> > > > > > >  >
> > > > > > >  >
> > > > > > >  >
> > > > > > >  >
> > > > > > >  > Wrong Answer: Open the refrigerator, put in the elephant
> and
> > > > close the refrigerator.
> > > > > > >  >
> > > > > > >  > Correct Answer: Open the refrigerator, take out the
> giraffe,
> > > put in the elephant and close the door. This tests your ability to
> think
> > > through the repercussions of your actions.
> > > > > > >  >
> > > > > > >  >3. The Lion King is hosting an animal conference, all the
> > > animals attend except one. Which animal does not attend?
> > > > > > >  >
> > > > > > >  >
> > > > > > >  >
> > > > > > >  >
> > > > > > >  >
> > > > > > >  >
> > > > > > >  >
> > > > > > >  >
> > > > > > >  >
> > > > > > >  >
> > > > > > >  >
> > > > > > >  > Correct Answer: The Elephant. The Elephant is in the
> > > > refrigerator.
> > > > > This tests your memory. OK, even if you did not answer the first
> three
> > > questions, correctly, you still have one more chance to show your
> > abilities.
> > > > > > >  >
> > > > > > >  > 4. There is a river you must cross. But it is inhabited by
> > > > > crocodiles. How do you manage it?
> > > > > > >  >
> > > > > > >  >
> > > > > > >  >
> > > > > > >  >
> > > > > > >  >
> > > > > > >  >
> > > > > > >  >
> > > > > > >  >
> > > > > > >  >
> > > > > > >  >
> > > > > > >  >
> > > > > > >  >
> > > > > > >  >
> > > > > > >  >
> > > > > > >  > Correct Answer: You swim across. All the Crocodiles are
> > > attending the Animal Meeting! This tests whether you learn quickly
> from
> > your
> > > mistakes.  According to Andersen Consulting Worldwide, around 90% of
> the
> > > Professionals they tested got all questions wrong. But many
> preschoolers
> > got
> > > several correct answers. Anderson Consulting says this conclusively
> > disproves
> > > the theory that most professionals have the brains of a four year old.


Jeff-

This is a guy from South Carolina who works with a bunch of industrial
customers there.  At the last GridSouth meeting, he cornered Joe Connor and I
and asked us about California and the price spikes there.  I told him a bunch
of reasons why the price spikes happened, but it appears that he wants more
information.

I would appreciate it if you would call him or if you could find someone else
out there in CA to give him a call.  He is not super sophisticated, but he is
the representative of some big clients, so I try to keep him happy.  [I think
he represents Michelin and Nucor steel--two huge energy users in South
Carolina.]

Thank you very much.

Tom Chapman
---------------------- Forwarded by Tom Chapman/HOU/ECT on 08/21/2000 07:16
PM ---------------------------

"Bob Knight" <bknight@brettpr.com> on 08/21/2000 12:54:30 PM
To: <tom.chapman@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: California

Tom

Do you have a contact in California that I can continue my questioning about
the situation out there?

Bob Knight
Brett Public Relations
864-239-0616 Greenville
803-765-1955 Columbia
803-608-4207 mobile

 - Bob Knight.vcf


Mr. Giordano:

We have received the executed copies of the ISDA Master Agreements for the referenced counterparties, however, we still need to receive the supporting documentation set forth in my letters transmitting the execution copies to you.

For Catequil Partners, L.P., we need to receive items 1-5 set forth in my transmittal letter of 10/11/01 (copy attached).

For Catequil Overseas Partners Ltd., we need to receive items 1-5 set forth in my transmittal letter of 10/11/01 (copy attached).

We look forward to receiving these documents as soon as possible, so that we can close our files.  Thank you for your assistance and, should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Marie

Marie Heard
Senior Legal Specialist
Enron North America Corp.
Phone:  (713) 853-3907
Fax:  (713) 646-3490
marie.heard@enron.com


Just a reminder for HE 18-20 today
c

---------------------- Forwarded by Cara Semperger/PDX/ECT on 02/06/2001
07:36 AM ---------------------------

Lisa Gang
02/05/2001 04:23 PM
To: BILL.WILLIAMS.III@ENRON.COM, Stanley Cocke/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jeremy
Morris/PDX/ECT@ECT, Brian Robinhold/PDX/ECT@ECT, Geir Solberg/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Holden Salisbury/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jesse Bryson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael M
Driscoll/PDX/ECT@ECT, Lester Rawson/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Cara Semperger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Donald Robinson/PDX/ECT@ECT
Subject: BPA AND PGE SCHEDULE REINSTATEMENT

Please reinstate the following schedule on Real Time for 1mw for HE 18-20.
PRM forgot to call it into BPA.  Please remind PRM to call it into BPA.

Empower #486140 - purchase BPA

Empower #513682 - sale to PGE

Path:  BPA@sys#23928-NAC-BPA(t)sys/sys#96111NF-NAC-BPA-EPMI-PGE@SYS

Thank You

Lisa


Probably not my place to comment but I haven't seen anything from Bryan yet.
We need to find a better way around this no-one is ever going to consent if
that is required for specific customers.  But on the major point , having
spoken to Bryan over th elast couple of days, I believe he is not going to
quote on any entity we have a big relationship with initially.  I have seen
the first pass at the list but know that Bryan wasn't happy with it as it
included people like TXU.

On the other point do you actually mean consent or notification - if we send
them a notice, follow up with  a phone call on the big ones then we can make
a business decision about how they feel.  Do they actually need to agree on
paper?

Louise

To: Bryan Seyfried/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Louise Kitchen/LON/ECT@ECT, Paul
Simons/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Consent

Apparently there was some miscommunication.  It was very clear to me after
our meeting in Louise's office that with respect to proposed Reference
Entities with which Enron has an existing business relationship you were
going to add the consent to the notice letter.  It was that consent that was
to dramatically speed up the process of determining which Reference Entities
could be listed.  As we discussed last week, without that consent each
proposed Reference Entity must be evaluated separately regarding whether or
not a confidentiality agreement is in place and whether or not the existing
business relationship is extensive enough to require consent.  Neither of
these evaluations will be easy or quick.  While Enron North America has been
reasonably good about compiling lists of confidentiality agreements, it is by
no means clear that all other Enron entities have done so.  We have not yet
determined a process for evaluating the extent of the existing business
relationships with our customers but that process will necessarily require
significant amounts of legal and commercial time at a high enough level to
make important judgment calls.

My impression was that you were willing to add the consents to the notice
letters since in one fell swoop it resolved a difficult legal issue and moved
your earliest possible launch date forward by weeks if not months but also on
the assumption that if a customer was not willing to give us their consent we
should not be taking the commercial risk that it was precisely those
customers whose relationships would be jeopardized by proceeding to use them
as a Reference Entity.

We will now move forward to develop the processes necessary to conduct the
evaluations mentioned above.  Please send the list of proposed Reference
Entities as soon as possible.

Bryan Seyfried
01/19/2000 06:35 AM
To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Louise Kitchen/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Paul Simons/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Consent

Just to clarify, we do not intend to ask for consent from every reference
credit, we do intend to send introductory letters to the relevant parties at
the initial set of reference credits which notifies them of our intentions
and why it is good for them.  My hope is that there are very few reference
credits that we need to get consent from and then we can make the commercial
decision of whether it is better to get consent or not quote on them.

As an initial step, I think we need to understand which reference credits
have confidentiality agreements in place and determine those names that we
have a potential fiduciary responsibility.  The latter obviously will not be
black and white but hopefully we can make some progress.  I would expect that
are really deep relationships are likely to be with either really small
counterparties or a very small subset of our large counterparties.

Hopefully I am restating what everyone already thought but if not apologies
for the miscommunication.

Call me if you want to discuss further.

bs


Ian,

Sorry for a delay in getting back to you.
I have one challenge I did not anticipate
when I talked to you  the first time about our Real Options
internal seminar.

The materials were prepared in collaboration with a professor
from another school, and there is some  sensitivity regarding
the intellectual property rights and the ability to distribute the materials
outside Enron.

Please, give me some time to find out if I can work
around this issue.

Vince

"MacMillan, Ian" <macmilli@wharton.upenn.edu> on 03/07/2001 06:46:28 AM
To: "'Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com'" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Lawyer

I still have not heard from your lawyer.  I would like to see whar materials
you are using and assess how we could work on the topic of real options with
Enron


We at IntercontinentalExchange would like to announce the relocation of our Houston office.
The new address is:
1415 Lousiana, suite 3350
Houston, TX 77002

New phone numbers:
Lance Leffingwell  713-571-6691
JC Kneale   713-571-7821
Fax 713-571-8243

If you have any questions please feel free to contact us and we look forward to serving you!

Thank you,
IntercontinentalExchange


Thanks, Sara - we'll get you all hooked up for delivery to Houston.

All the best,
Scott

Sara.Shackleton@enron.com wrote:

> Here's the preferred address:
>
>      Sara Shackleton
>      Enron Corp.
>      1400 Smith Street - EB 3801a
>      Houston, TX  77002
>
> In case you need a phone number at my place of work, it is (713) 853-5620.
> Thanks.  Sara
>
>
>                     Scott Wright
>                     <scott@scottp        To:     sara.shackleton@enron.com
>                     aul.com>             cc:
>                                          Subject:     Re: Your
ScottPaul.com order confirmation
>                     10/29/2000
>                     07:06 PM
>
>
>
> Dear Sara -
>
> I think we've found a way to ship to you in TX - would you rather do that?
> If so, just send me back your TX shipping address -
>
> Thanks!
>
> Scott
>
> sara.shackleton@enron.com wrote:
>
> > Thank you for your order with Scott Paul Wines!
> >
> > Please keep this email for your records.
> >
> > PRODUCT NAME, PRICE, QTY, SUBTOTAL
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> > 1999 Pisoni Vineyard Pinot Noir,  $38.00,  12,  $456.00
> >
> >   Sub-Total:  $456.00
> >                Tax:  $22.80
> >      Shipping:  $53.92
> > Grand Total:  $532.72
> >
> > Your shipping information is as follows:
> >
> >         Email:  sara.shackleton@enron.com
> >         Name:  Michael McKeogh
> > Address 1:  601 Poydras Street
> > Address 2:  Suite 2421
> >            City:  New Orleans
> >          State:  Louisiana
> >              Zip:  70130
> >
> > Our wines are on a first-come, first-served basis, so kindly mail your
> check promptly.  We may be unable to fulfill your order if payment is not
> received by November 10th.  Also include with your check a copy of this
> email, or the printout when you ordered your wine online.
> >
> > The 1999 Chardonnay is scheduled to ship the week of November 13th, 2000.
> >
> > The 1999 Pinot Noir - Pisoni Vineyard is scheduled to ship in late March,
> 2001.
> >
> > Please note that shipping dates may be subject to change, should we
> encounter extreme weather conditions that may adversely affect the wines.
> >
> > If you have any questions, please contact us via email
> (martha@scottpaul.com) or call us direct at 707-944-1188.
> >
> > Thank you again.
> >
> > Martha and Scott Wright
> > Proprietors
> > Scott Paul Wines, LLC


Mark,
I called earlier today and left a lengthy phone message........sorry about that - we had a trading issue in the middle of my conversation with you.

Anyway,  I received the following question from some of our Retail folks.
If you could help answer this question I would really appreciate it.
Jeff Miller and I are planning to visit Austin next Friday to discuss Settlements.   We look forward to meeting you.
Are you a golfer?   We may try to play Friday afternoon.

JForney
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maheu, Peter
Sent:	Wednesday, August 08, 2001 8:28 AM
To:	Forney, John M.
Subject:	Re: ERCOT SETTLEMENTS

---------------------- Forwarded by Peter Maheu/HOU/EES on 08/08/2001 08:27 AM ---------------------------

Peter Maheu
07/30/2001 12:55 PM
To:	John M Forney/ENRON@enronXgate @ ENRON
cc:	Kenneth Farrar/HOU/EES@EES, Gary Galow/HOU/EES@EES
Subject:	Re: ERCOT SETTLEMENTS

Example assumptions:
Market consists entirely of 4 QSEs who have the following schedule-actual variances in a particular hour; A=+50MW; B=+50MW; C=-25MW & D=-25MW.
Market energy price is $100/MWH.

Since money paid by C & D is insufficient to fully reimburse A & B (5000+5000-2500-2500=5000), what happens in the settlement?  Do A & B get proportionally less than they otherwise would have gotten?  Or, is there a banking mechanism that builds up in hours where there are overages and is drawn down in hours where there are shortages (such as example above)?

<Embedded StdOleLink>
<Embedded Picture (Device Independent Bitmap)>


Shirley,

Please, try the E-mail address below.

Vince

---------------

------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 01/17/2001 01:29 PM
---------------------------

Vince J Kaminski
01/17/2001 09:48 AM
To: khairuddin_mjaafar@petronas.com.my
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Petronas benchmarking visit

Khairuddin,

Thanks for your message. The fax has been sent.

Vince

KhairuddinBMJaafar@petronas.com.my on 01/17/2001 01:50:36 AM
Please respond to khairuddin_mjaafar@petronas.com.my
To: vkamins@ect.enron.com
cc: azminab@petronas.com.my
Subject: Petronas benchmarking visit

Dear Mr. Kaminski,

Pertaining to our visit to your kind company in February, we are required
to obtain Visas for the trip. To apply for the Visas, the Embassy requires
a letter from the US Company confirming our meeting or visit. We would
really be grateful if you can fax us a confirmation letter so that we can
proceed with our Visa application. Please fax the letter to:

Mr. Nur Azmin Abu Bakar
Head, Risk Assessment and Control
Corporate Risk Management Unit,
Corporate Planning and Development Division
Level 71, Tower 1, Petronas Twin Towers,
Kuala Lumpur City Centre,
50088 Kuala Lumpur,
MALAYSIA
Fax: (603) 2051-3252

Your speedy reply is greatly appreciated.

Thank you and regards,

Khairuddin .

 DISCLAIMER  : This e-mail and any files transmitted with it ("Message")
 is  intended  only  for the use of the recipient(s) named above and may
 contain  confidential  information.   You  are hereby notified that the
 taking  of  any action in reliance upon, or any review, retransmission,
 dissemination, distribution, printing or copying of this Message or any
 part thereof by anyone other than the intended recipient(s) is strictly
 prohibited.  If  you  have  received  this Message in error, you should
 delete this Message immediately and advise the sender by return e-mail.
 Opinions, conclusions and other information in this Message that do not
 relate  to  the official business of PETRONAS or its Group of Companies
 shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by PETRONAS or any of
 the companies within the Group.

(Embedded image moved to file: pic05415.pcx)
 - pic05415.pcx


WE ARE IN NEED OF ADDITIONAL VOLLEYBALL FANS TO PLAY TONIGHT @ 7PM  @ WILSON
HIGH SCHOOL.

PLEASE SEE PAUL CHOI OR ME IF YOU ARE AVAILABLE!


This is a very tough time. I honestly don't know what the hell is going on. I will let you know.

Thanks,
Andy


Stuart -

Attached are the chain of e-mails on the agreement.  I recommend a direct
red-line between the two agreements (what I sent them, and what they sent
back) before we mark up their letter.

They understand what we are doing with the plants, and I don't think will
have a problem with the changes we discussed.  I don't yet know what their
response to Brownsville will be however.

After you review the attached give me a call to discuss.

Mitch

Kay Mann
11/27/2000 10:14 AM
To: Roseann Engeldorf/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John
Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, davidlu@nepco.com
cc: Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Enron Issues Letter

Hi there,

In resolving some issues with Westinghouse there was an agreement reached
concerning the disposition of the Blue Girl turbines, as well as certain
issues relating to the Gleason and Wheatland facilities.  In connection with
this agreement I am forwarding to you a draft letter agreement concerning
resolution of these matters.  As you can see, Westinghouse has requested that
NEPCO, EEPC and LJM2-Turbine, LLC sign the agreement.

Your comments would be appreciated.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/27/2000 10:08
AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Mitch Robinson                           11/22/2000 09:09 AM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Stuart Zisman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Don Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Enron Issues Letter

Some changes.  Can you review and advise?

Mitch
---------------------- Forwarded by Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron on 11/22/2000
09:08 AM ---------------------------

DeKrey Lynn <Lynn.DeKray@swpc.siemens.com> on 11/21/2000 10:42:05 AM
To: "'Mitch.Robinson@enron.com'" <Mitch.Robinson@enron.com>
cc: Monahan Bill <Bill.Monahan@swpc.siemens.com>

Subject: Enron Issues Letter

Mitch
Attached are SWPC revisions to your proposed letter. Our contracts group
advised to add signatures for all affected parties to the agreement, in
addition to know parties for contracts on Gleason and Wheatland sites, we
have added parties identified in draft Blue Girl contract, Enron input as to
appropriate Enron signatures for the Blue Girl would be appreciated.  Please
call with any concerns.

Regards
Lynn DeKrey
407 736 2823
 <<Proposal to Resolve Issues on Enron - Rev by SWPC.doc>>

 - Proposal to Resolve Issues on Enron - Rev by SWPC.doc

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Mitch Robinson                           11/16/2000 08:16 AM

To: Don Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike J Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Westinghouse

I talked with Westinghouse this morning.  They have some minor changes to the
agreement.  They'll have the changes back this afternoon.  If the changes
reflect what they described on the phone, then we'll be ready to sign
tomorrow morning.

Mike, are you in tomorrow to sign?

Mitch
---------------------- Forwarded by Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron on 11/27/2000
12:15 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Mitch Robinson                           11/16/2000 11:01 AM

To: Mike J Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Westinghouse

Thanks Mike.  SWPC said they want to add the words "or any subsidiary of
Enron" to the part that says we won't bill them anymore invoices.  Their
concern is that there are current invoices out there, but they are from
NEPCO, not from me.

I'm comfortable with this, but at some point, EE&CC/NEPCO/EES will likely
want us to pay for these then.  The amount is approximately the same as the
amount we (EE&CC and ENA) owe SWPC for out-of-scope charges.

I'll just get Kevin to sign the letter.

Thanks,

Mitch

Mike J Miller@ECT
11/16/2000 10:38 AM
To: Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Westinghouse

I'm leaving by noon today and flying to London for vacation.  Will not be
back until Monday, November 26.  This e-mail serves as my approval of the
Westinghouse letter as i have reviewed the latest draft and am in full
agreement with the terms and conditions of the settlement.  I believe Jeff
Donahue will be around, Don Miller can help you run this by him and get his
signoff.

Regards,

Mike J Miller

+
	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Mitch Robinson                           11/13/2000 10:55 AM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Mike J Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Westinghouse letters

Thanks Kay.  I'll forward them on the Westinghouse by e-mail first.

Mitch

Kay Mann
11/13/2000 10:47 AM
To: Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Westinghouse letters

Hi Mitch,

My suggested changes are highlighted.

Please let me know what else I can do.

Kay


yadayadayada

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Whalley, Greg
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 12:44 PM
To: Lavorato, John
Subject: Re: FW: delainey discussions

maybe that would be the best solution


John, Would you have 45 minutes later this week for Eric and myself? We'd like to give you a quick update on whats happening in the Atlantic basin in LNG, and also get an update from you on where the US Natgas market is heading.

Thanks,
Jonathan


My suggested edits are in CAPS.


See dear, sometimes you get what you ask for. Love you-L

A bum, who obviously has seen more than his share of hard
times, approaches a well dressed gentleman on the street.
"Hey, Buddy, can you spare two dollars?"

The well-dressed gentleman responds, "You are not going to
spend in on liquor are you?"

"No, sir, I don't drink," retorts the bum.

"You are not going to throw it away in some crap game, are
 you?" asks the gentleman.

"No way, I don't gamble," answers the bum.

"You wouldn't waste the money at a golf course for greens
fees, would you?" asks the man.

"Never," says the bum, "I don't play golf."

The man asks the bum if he would like to come home with him
for a home cooked meal.

The bum accepts eagerly. While they are heading for the
man's house, the bum's curiosity gets the better of him.
"Isn't your wife going to be angry when she sees a guy like me at your table?"

"Probably," says the man, "but it will be worth it. I want  her to see what happens to a guy who doesn't drink, gamble  or play golf."