Additional information on the regulatory context.
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/HOU/EES on 08/02/2000 06:19
PM ---------------------------

Richard Shapiro
08/02/2000 05:54 PM
To: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Regulatory issues memo: Revised

---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES on 08/02/2000
05:53 PM ---------------------------

Richard Shapiro
08/01/2000 11:59 AM
To: Cheryl Lipshutz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Mellencamp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nicole
Alvino/HOU/ECT@ECT, lbrasher@skadden.com, cstill@skadden.com
cc: wweiland@velaw.com
Subject: Regulatory issues memo: Revised

Enclosed is revised regulatory " issues" memo that  served as the basis for
discussion at yesterday's regulatory  review  meeting--- the only outstanding
issue , as I just communicated to Charles Still at Skadden, is confirmation
of  the fact that there are no antitrust approvals required in South Korea
relative to SK- that confirmation should be forthcoming from local counsel
this evening.  Lisa- I assume you will see this gets to Bill Gathmann
immediately so he can  forward on to regional general counsel for final
sign-off.
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES on 08/01/2000
11:47 AM ---------------------------

"Weiland, William" <wweiland@velaw.com> on 08/01/2000 11:44:10 AM
To: "'Shapiro, Rick'" <rshapiro@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Attached Files

Rick, please find attached clean and marked versions of the regulatory
issues memo.
 <<Regulatory Issues.DOC>>  <<compare 4v2.DOC>>

 - Regulatory Issues.DOC
 - compare 4v2.DOC


Enron Wind N?t Sverige AB  (Company #1747 - EWNS), was incorporated and officially registered in Sweden on 19 October 2001.  Particulars are:

PARENT COMPANY(IES):
				Enron Wind Corp. Holdings B.V.

BUSINESS PURPOSE:		To carry on grid-related activities and any other activity compatible therewith.

SHARES:			Authorized:  100,000; p.v. SEK 100
				Issued:  1,000

DIRECTORS/OFFICERS		See attached corporate data sheet

EMPLOYEES:			No

TAX:  Please apply for FEIN, if necessary
TREASURY:  No banking resolutions adopted
CORPORATE RECORDS:  Please recycle minute book.  Incorporation documents to be hand delivered.

Larry Pardue
Supervisor, Corporate Services
     and Assistant Secretary
Enron Corp.
1400 Smith Street, Suite 4804
Houston, TX 77002
Tel  +713 345 5376
Fax  +713 646 8007
email:  larry.pardue@enron.com


Hello craig.dean@enron.com:

Thank you for registering for a Microsoft
 .NET Passport at a participating Web site.

Use the e-mail address (craig.dean@enron.com) and password you provided during registration to sign in instantly at any .NET Passport-enabled Web site that displays the .NET Passport sign-in button.

If you also created a Passport wallet, you can use it to make faster, easier purchases at sites that offer the Passport express purchase service. (If you didn't create a Passport wallet and you would like to, we'll tell you how below.)

You can see a list of .NET Passport sites at: http://www.passport.com/directory.asp.

The rest of this e-mail message contains important information about how to use your .NET Passport. You may want to refer back to it on occasion, so please save it or print a copy.

TO SIGN IN AND SIGN OUT AT A .NET Passport-ENABLED SITE

TO SIGN IN, click the ".NET Passport sign in" button on the site, and then type your e-mail address and password in the sign-in box that appears. You can sign in to some .NET Passport-enabled sites simply by typing your e-mail address and password directly in the .NET Passport sign-in box on that site's home page (without first clicking the .NET Passport sign-in button).

After you sign in to one .NET Passport-enabled site, you can sign in to any other just by clicking the ".NET Passport sign in" button on each site.

TO SIGN OUT, click the ".NET Passport sign out" button on the site. Clicking this button at any site will sign you out of all .NET Passport-enabled sites.

TO CREATE YOUR PASSPORT WALLET AND USE PASSPORT EXPRESS PURCHASE

You need a Passport wallet to use the Passport express purchase service. A Passport wallet is a secure, convenient way to store your credit card and billing/shipping address information online.

You can create your Passport wallet now at: https://wallet.passport.com.

To make an online purchase using the information stored in your Passport wallet, click the "Passport express purchase" button at a participating site, sign in to .NET Passport (if you're not already signed in), and choose which credit card and shipping address you want to use. Your information will be sent to the site instantly, over a secure connection.

IF YOU FORGET YOUR PASSWORD

Click this link to create your new password at the .NET Passport Web site:
https://memberservices.passport.com/ppsecure/MSRV_ResetPW.asp

OTHER IMPORTANT .NET Passport LINKS

If you want to view or change your .NET Passport or wallet, or if you need help, visit .NET Passport Member Services at: http://www.passport.com/memberservices.asp.

NET Passport is committed to protecting your privacy. We encourage you to review our privacy statement at: http://www.passport.com/privacypolicy.asp.

For more information about .NET Passport, visit: http://www.passport.com.

IF CLICKING A LINK DOESN'T WORK...

Copy it, and then paste it into your Web browser's address bar.
Select the entire link (which starts with http:// and may include more than one line) and then copy it, usually by clicking the "Edit" menu item and then clicking "Copy". Next, open your Web browser and click in the box where you usually see the Web page address. Paste the link into this box (usually by clicking "Paste" in the "Edit" menu) and click "Go" or "Enter".

Thank you for using your .NET Passport!
NET Passport Customer Support

Please do not reply to this message; it was sent from an unmonitored e-mail address and we are unable to respond to any replies.


The deals were entered yesterday -

461029
Williams

461030
EES

Thanks

Kerri Thompson@ENRON
11/17/2000 07:04 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: apb checkout

still waiting on these 2 deals.

Kerri Thompson
11/16/2000 04:10 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: apb checkout

missing deals

jeff r
selling williams
20-30th
25 mw
sp15
115.00
on peak

jeff r
buying ees
20-30th
25 mw
sp15
114.95
on peak

tom a
buying koch
20-30
25 mw
114.00
palo
on peak


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT on 02/04/2000
05:08 PM ---------------------------

"mary richards" <maryrichards7@hotmail.com> on 01/31/2000 02:39:43 PM
To: Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

I revised the supp-vendor sheet and have transferred the totals to the
summary sheet. Please review and let me know if this is what you had in
mind. Also, are we getting W-2 forms or what on our taxes.
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

 - Jan00Expense.xls


Group,
A quick reminder.
All El Paso Electric Deals and related deals for El Paso Electric (ie buying from SRP selling to EPE--anything with a group of EPEC in Enpower) need to be in MST. These deals should be scheduled in MST on the deal scheduling portion of Enpower as well.

Thanks,
Bill


Carrie -

After speaking with Susan about the Annex, it was determined that a few
changes needed to be made for consistency sake within the Website.  I have,
therefore, made some minor modifications and have provided them below.

Essentially, we are going to call information provided to the Modules by a
User or Counterparty simply Commodity Information.  This will be further
defined in the CL glossary of terms in a generic manner so that it can
encompass all types of information related to Commodity Transactions,
regardless of the Module within which a User or Counterparty is working.

Please take a look at the attached and let me know your thoughts.

Mark
Senior Counsel, ENA
Phone:     713-345-8897
Facsimile: 713-646-3940
E-Mail:      Mark.Greenberg@enron.com


Patrick, sorry for the short notice to try to catch up with you in L.A. this week.  As mentioned, I am responsible for the Gas Marketing efforts in the West. For a variety of reasons we have been slow in contacting you but I know that from a Trading perspective you have a strong relationship with our staff and were probably getting covered on most items you were needing.

My groups interests are around transportation, risk management, Strategic Assets, storage etc... .items that we believe are more of a term fit that real time position management issue.

We spend a lot of time on fundamentals, research, hedging strategies, load forecasting etc.

You had mentioned being in town in early November and if your schedule allows I would welcome the chance to get together.

Please contact me as you know your calendar and in the interim.... if I end up in the city prior to the end of the month, I may try to contact you then.

Thanks in advance.

Barry Tycholiz
Vice President
Enron North America


Ben-

It was good to see you- I'll give you a buzz next time I'm in Houston.

Let me know if you have any questions about UT, BSchool, app process, etc...

I gave your email to Loncto-

Here's to a lot of golf next year if you decide to come to Austin!

D


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/16/2001 08:32
AM ---------------------------

Kay Mann
02/13/2001 04:13 PM
To: lhenneberry@ssd.com, mahonl@pbworld.com, losi@pbworld.com,
mesko@pbworld.com
cc: Mark Bernstein/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Co Op City, Revised Development Agreement term sheet

Good afternoon,

I'm forwarding a revised development agreement term sheet, showing revisions
from your original version.

We look forward to seeing you soon.

Thanks,

Kay


Brace yourself.  I'm putting in the June charge of $6.26 !!!  I just got the
invoice today.

Sherry Anastas
07/14/2000 01:03 PM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: CGAS

Chris,

I sent a check to KO Transmission for Monday, 7/20 for $71.19.  This amount
covers 2/00 - 5/00 production.

Sherry

Chris Germany
07/11/2000 12:19 PM
To: Brenda H Fletcher/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Theresa Franklin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joann
Collins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robert Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor
Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT, Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth L
Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marlene Hilliard/HOU/ECT@ect, Sherry
Anastas/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: CGAS

I made the following changes so we can track and pay the KO Transmission
invoice.  I terminated deal 236178 (CGAS k#60094) effective 6/30/2000.  I
believe Joann has been using this deal to path the KO Transmission activity.
I created deal 327869 effective 2/1/2000 - this is a CGAS contract with KO
Transmission as the service provider.  We will still do the noms via CGAS on
this contract.  However, we will pay KO Transmission for the transport
expense.

According to KO, we have not paid our Feb - May invoices.  I set these
charges up on deal 327869 as demand charges.  The amount are small.
Beginning with July, we will reflect a usage charge on deal 327869.

Questions??


_____________________DAVID COURSEY_____________________

WHY THE IDEA OF AN ID CHIP MAKES MY SKIN CRAWL

    Dogs, cats, and cows have them now, so how long
         could it be before a surgically inserted ID
         chip comes to people? In the case of the new
         VeriChip, the answer is how long it takes for
         the FDA to approve it. This is an example of
         a technology that could help some people--but
         hurt lots of others, too. Let me explain why
         the VeriChip should give you shivers, too.

http://cgi.zdnet.com/slink?/adeskb/adt1220/2833893:8593142

   PLUS: ANCHORDESK RADIO: IS THE FREE WEB DEAD?

http://cgi.zdnet.com/slink?/adeskb/adt1220/2833892:8593142

#

_____________________NEWS ANALYSIS_____________________

Sylvia Carr

    XP HEATING UP?... DON'T COPY THAT CD!... 'NEW YEAR' WORM
HITS...

    How's Windows XP doing? Not so hot on
    the retail front. But that doesn't mean
    it's going to be a flop. Judging by license
    sales to PC makers and businesses--a
    better measure of an operating system's
    success--XP may become Microsoft's
    best-selling OS yet.

http://cgi.zdnet.com/slink?/adeskb/adt1220/2833900:8593142

_____________________EXPERT ADVICE_____________________

Robert Vamosi

  WANT BETTER WORKPLACE SECURITY? JUST USE SOME COMMON
  SENSE!

   Yes, almost every electronic device emits
         radio noise that can be eavesdropped by your
         enemies. But is this really your company's
         biggest security worry? Robert says no. Your
         real concerns are much more mundane--like
         closing your shades.

http://cgi.zdnet.com/slink?/adeskb/adt1220/2833569:8593142

			> > > > >

Janice Chen

  LIGHTEN YOUR LOAD WITH THIS SLEEK AND SEXY NOTEBOOK

   Longer lines at airports and tighter restrictions
         on carry-on luggage mean you want your laptop
         to be as thin and light as possible. Your best
         bet? An ultralight. Janice has chosen a beauty--the
         Sharp PC-UM10--that's featherlight, super
         thin, and still has a lot of power under the
         hood.

http://cgi.zdnet.com/slink?/adeskb/adt1220/2833832:8593142

			> > > > >

Preston Gralla

  IM: HERE'S TALK THAT ISN'T JUST CHEAP, IT'S FREE

   For staying in constant contact with your
         friends and co-workers, it doesn't get much
         better than instant messaging. Preston rounds
         up three downloads that will get you into the
         IM game if you're not already, or show you how
         to make the most of your program if you're already
         addicted.

http://cgi.zdnet.com/slink?/adeskb/adt1220/2833829:8593142

			> > > > >

_____________________CRUCIAL CLICKS_____________________
Make sure you see these features on ZDNet today!

DON'T MISS ZDNET'S LAST-MINUTE HOLIDAY SHOPPING GUIDE
http://chkpt.zdnet.com/chkpt/adeskclicks/http://zdnetshopper.cnet.com/shopping/0-7413293-7-8143480.html

COMING SOON... A HANDHELD THAT TALKS BACK
http://www.zdnet.com/techupdate/stories/main/0,14179,2831331,00.html

CHECK OUT THIS NEARLY PERFECT DIGITAL CAMERA
http://www.zdnet.com/supercenter/stories/overview/0,12069,533678,00.html

******************ELSEWHERE ON ZDNET!******************

Thrill your favorite techie with perfect presents at ZDNet Shopper.
http://cgi.zdnet.com/slink?166139

Ten tips to help you attain CRM ROI.
http://cgi.zdnet.com/slink?166140

Get the lowdown on all the different wireless LAN standards.
http://cgi.zdnet.com/slink?166141

Editors' Top 5: Check out the best gifts money can buy.
http://cgi.zdnet.com/slink?166142

Find out about standardizing C# in Tech Update's special report.
http://cgi.zdnet.com/slink?166143

***********************************************************

AnchorDesk comes to you free of charge as a
service of ZDNet. On its companion Web site,
AnchorDesk includes full details on the stories
you see above, plus late-breaking news, links
to in-depth information, and much more. Visit:
http://www.anchordesk.com/

To subscribe, unsubscribe, or make changes to your subscription,
please go to:
 http://cgi.zdnet.com/slink?130228

We are sending this news alert to the address:
pallen@ENRON.COM
Please make sure to provide this address in
all your e-mail messages to us.  Thanks!

Copyright ? 2001 ZD Inc. ZDNet is a registered
service mark of ZD Inc. ZDNet Logo is a service
mark of ZD Inc.

 ###


We are supposed to try to have the break out contract by April 11, and I
think the consents and stuff that same week.

Kay

"Shoemaker, Kent (GEAE)" <kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com> on 04/06/2001 03:17:24 PM
To: "'Kay.Mann@enron.com'" <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: RE: Salmon Energy Turbine Agreement

What's your scheduling like on this one

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, April 06, 2001 4:12 PM
To: kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com
Subject: Salmon Energy Turbine Agreement

Hi Kent,

I can get a redline done for you if you want to tell me what it should be
redlined against.

I don't know about getting rid of the requirement for the inhouse counsel
opinion.  Maybe after you look at things we can discuss it.

Thanks,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/06/2001 03:08
PM ---------------------------

"Thompson, Peter J." <pthompson@akllp.com> on 04/02/2001 04:56:21 PM

To:   "Kay Mann (E-mail)" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc:   "Pipitone, Paul" <paulpipitone@akllp.com>

Subject:  Salmon Energy Turbine Agreement

     Attached please find the latest Salmon Energy Turbine Agreement
(second document below), as well as a blackline (first document below)
showing changes made to the version circulated last Friday.  Pursuant to
your instructions, the performance values in Article 10 are per the 24
Unit master agreement.  In addition no changes have been made to the
Maximum or Unit Liability Amounts or payment schedule. To complete the
agreement, we will need to insert the date of execution and Exhibit H-2.

 <<Comparison of Versions 2 to 3 of Salmon Energy Agreement.DOC>>
<<Salmon Energy Agreement - Version 3.DOC>>
(See attached file: Comparison of Versions 2 to 3 of Salmon Energy
Agreement.DOC)
(See attached file: Salmon Energy Agreement - Version 3.DOC)


need to enter new transaction, contacts, etc.


Michelle,

Attached is a draft of ENA's GISB for your review.  Please do not hesitate to
give me a  call with any quetions and or comments you may have.

Regards,
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Jim,
I just wanted to bring to your attention the volume of congestion that we relieved last night.
It looks like 28 mws at $198 and 75 mws at $223.00.
This should be at total revenue of $22,269.00.

Please see me with any questions.
Thanks,
Bill


Sorry for the delay,  I will send the documents out on Friday.

Regards,
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Darron and Brian

I pushed a few test deals for Canadian products through and need you to review these deals in Tagg and Sitara to verify that they are booking correctly for valuation purposes.  Please let me know if you see any problems (indexes, books, pricing, etc.)  Don't worry about the deal highlighted in pink..I am working on getting this to bridge.

Please reply by e-mail!!!

Dawn


Executive Summary:

-CPUC likely to pass rate hikes tomorrow, politicians bowing to the inevitable
-Many questions still unanswered, most notably size/structure of rate increase and past utility debts
-Past undercollect major sticking point, with little help available from transmission deal or long-term contracts
-Reliant seeking relief in circuit court from emergency orders; large generators increasingly angry with Davis' "blame game"
-QFs waiting for details of rate hike; new price formula crucial to SoCal's ability to make payments
-Bankruptcy outlook increasingly complex, but debt rescheduling remains subject to failure

In our late Friday report, we wrote "Davis could order rate hikes as a last ditch effort, but this action would not address the undercollection  issue.  There is still a high chance of bankruptcy by either the larger generators, commercial paper holders, and (less now but still very possible) the QFs as time is running out."  Events are unfolding exactly along these lines.

1.	Why Rate Hikes Now?
CPUC President Lorretta Lynch came out this weekend in favor of rate hikes.  Davis and many legislators recognize that rate hikes are the quickest solution, but that there is a potentially painful political price attached.   Davis will probably come out in support of a structured rate system, passing on most of the hikes to business and industrial users.

Other California politicians are starting to face reality of rate hikes.  The CalEnergy ruling massively reduced their leverage over the creditors, who are now able to sell outside the state, if they can get similar relief from the courts.  And it's not just the QFs--the giant Reliant Energy is appealing to the Ninth Circuit Court in San Francisco against Federal Judge Frank Damrell's series of rulings forcing large generators to continue to sell to California.

2.	What Impact Will the Rate Hikes Have?
Rate rises will stabilize the situation going forward, but there will be a messy scramble to assign blame and liability for past debts.  Some form of rescheduling is a possibility, but there are any number of accidents that could happen and yet result in bankruptcy for the utilities -- if they don't seek protection from creditors themselves.

3.	Undercollection/Net Short Still Unaddressed
All of these developments fail to address the past undercollection or the bond revenue plan.  Still, the passage of rate hikes could speed up the legislature on these fronts as well.  The bulk of the rate hikes will go first to repay the DWR, then to the commercial creditors.  Absent the transmission line deal, the bond revenue plan would have to be restructured to repay the past undercollect.  Long-term power contracts are still relatively meaningless until 2003, when the majority of the contracts kick in.

4.	Large Power Suppliers Losing Patience
Relations are also deteriorating between Davis and the large power suppliers.  Davis for the most part has been very careful to cultivate them during the drawn out negotiations, talking to several of the main CEOs almost daily.  But state legislators and officials are rapidly trying to initiate investigations of alleged market manipulation and overcharging to deflect the growing political heat from themselves.  This is only agitating the larger generators more as every day passes.  If Reliant loses their case, it may also tempt some of the larger generators to force the issue to bankruptcy.  What's more, financial creditors are also waiting with growing impatience, and the utilities themselves are contemplating voluntary bankruptcy.  PG&E in particular simply will not agree to Davis' transmission lines deal as it stands, and a bankruptcy workout may offer the best, albeit uncertain, chance of a return to eventual health someday.

5.	QFs Listening and Waiting
But the largest threat, as we have been saying, is not from the major energy companies.  It is the small companies -- known as QFs -- that will be the triggers if bankruptcy occurs.  Remember these two facts: (1) The QFs are a diverse group of 600 companies, and it only takes three of them to force bankruptcy; and (2) many of them have to move in court quickly or lose any possible standing for future court action.  It is in the interests of a number of creditors to wait and hope that a negotiated settlement can be reached, but others have a large incentive to game the situation and threaten to force bankruptcy.

Other bullish news: PG&E gets extended forbearance until April 13th from its banks, and SoCal announces that it will pay some QFs.  The actual amount of payments to the QFs is still subject to the CPUC  approving a revised pricing formula that is satisfactory to the QFs.  That decision should come tomorrow.

6.	Outlook
Last week we wrote that "the QFs felt there was no point in filing today because they want to see what they can get from the legislature this week and in all likelihood, what they can get from the CPUC hearing next week."  The next 48 hours will be crucial.  Only massive rate hikes (40% or higher roughly) would address the undercollect issue and Davis is unlikely to authorize those.

As one source told us, "the age of denial is (mostly) coming to an end, and that is the main source of hope that California can begin to move forward from this."  But the situation is so complex, and there are so many players and angles involved, that a negotiated solution to the past debt problem will still be complicated and vulnerable to failure.


Monday February 4, 9:07 am Eastern Time
Press Release
SOURCE: Maritimes & Northeast Pipeline, L.L.C.
Maritimes Files Application for Phase IV Expansion Of Natural Gas Pipeline System
BOSTON, Feb. 4 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Maritimes & Northeast Pipeline, L.L.C. has submitted an application to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to further expand its natural gas pipeline system. The $250 million expansion project, designated Phase IV, will allow Maritimes to nearly double its capacity to transport natural gas from offshore Nova Scotia to markets in the northeastern United States from approximately 415,000 dekatherms to 800,000 dekatherms per day.
Demand for natural gas, especially in New England and the Northeast, continues to increase at a rapid rate. Maritimes received substantial requests for transportation services from local natural gas distribution companies, natural gas-fired electric generators and third-party marketers during a recently completed open season nominations period, emphasizing the market's desire for more natural gas from Atlantic Canada.
``The demand for natural gas is real, and it is significant,'' said Tom O'Connor, president of M&N Management Co., the managing member of Maritimes. ``Maritimes is able to respond to the demand by efficiently and economically expanding its system to deliver new supplies of gas from fields off Canada's east coast. Access to additional sources of this cleaner-burning fuel will ensure greater energy reliability and flexibility for the northeast region.''
Earlier this year, Maritimes signed agreements with PanCanadian Energy Services Inc. to transport up to approximately 400 million cubic feet per day of natural gas from PanCanadian's Deep Panuke project, offshore Nova Scotia. The Phase IV expansion project will accommodate the increased volumes of gas.
The Phase IV expansion complements the planned extension of the Maritimes pipeline from Methuen to Beverly, Mass. The extension -- Phase III of the Maritimes project -- will interconnect the 650-mile Maritimes pipeline with Algonquin Gas Transmission Co.'s 1,000-mile system through Algonquin's proposed HubLine project. The Maritimes Phase III and Algonquin HubLine projects recently received final approval from FERC.
The Phase IV project proposes to construct four compressor stations in Maine each with approximately 26,800 horsepower of additional compression and approximately 31.3 miles of additional pipeline loop facilities in Maine's Washington County. The new compressor stations are proposed to be located in the municipalities of Eliot, Gorham, Brewer and Searsmont. Maritimes recently held open houses in these communities to provide information on the proposed expansion.
``We will work closely with federal, state and municipal officials as well as landowners and stakeholders throughout the FERC process to ensure the project is designed and constructed with minimal impact to communities and the environment,'' said Bill Penney, senior vice president and general manager of Maritimes. ``As we proceed with the Phase IV expansion, Maritimes will continue its solid record of environmental, safety and operational compliance.''
In addition to the FERC application, Maritimes will submit applications to other appropriate federal and state agencies, including the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Coastal Zone Management and Maine Department of Environmental Protection. The Phase IV expansion is expected to be in service in 2004.
Maritimes is owned by affiliates of Duke Energy (37.5 percent); Westcoast Energy, Inc. (37.5 percent); ExxonMobil (12.5 percent); and Emera Inc. (12.5 percent). For more information, contact Maritimes on the Internet at www.mnp-usa.com <http://www.mnp-usa.com>.
    CONTACT:  Marylee Hanley
              Phone:   617/560-1573
              24-Hour: 704/382-8333
SOURCE: Maritimes & Northeast Pipeline, L.L.C.


I know that SCE is taking this position.  They are simple wrong.  Unless and until we get all of our "positive" CTC back from the Utility, why should I even begin to consider their "goofy" arguments.  In addition, SCE is receiving $3.3 B which is a full payment of all Negative CTC.  If their issue is to have a Undercollection charge against all customers, that's a different policy matter.  The CPUC agreed to the idea of Negative CTC and SCE needs to pay.

Also, if we are 5% of load and the Undercollection is $3.3 B, I think that SCE would be looking for $165 MM - our entire claim.  They aren't talking about 5% from our view $150 MM claim.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 6:18 PM
To:	Curry, Wanda
Cc:	Steffes, James D.; Tribolet, Michael
Subject:	RE: Conversation with Edison re: Getting Negative CTC Paid

Need to think about it a bit.  Here's some of what we know based on the settlement:

Total debt = 6.35 B
After they contribute all cash on their books and agree to eat a little, the PUC is allowing them to collect somewhere between $3.0-3.3B--depends on who you talk to.
The total owed to ESPs is $243 MM.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Curry, Wanda
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 5:56 PM
To:	Dasovich, Jeff
Cc:	Steffes, James D.; Tribolet, Michael
Subject:	RE: Conversation with Edison re: Getting Negative CTC Paid

Jeff,

Do we know how much Edison's total under collection is?  Would it be as simple as to determine their total (around $3 billion?) and  gross receivable (before any payments - 145 million) and calculate the % (around 5%)?  This would result in a pretty small percentage.  Another way to look at it would be on a % of load basis.  If you use the DA load information Sue forwarded to us on October 1st,   this % (5.7%)  would also be very small.  How do you think they will look at it?  I think we would all agree to a 5% haircut, if they would JUST PAY US!

Wanda

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Tuesday, October  23, 2001 5:19 PM
To:	Steffes, James D.; Curry, Wanda; Tribolet, Michael
Subject:	RE: Conversation with Edison re: Getting Negative CTC Paid

Wanda:  I faxed the examples that Edison faxed us and that you and Michael and I talked about some time back.  I'm sure that's how Edison would calculate it.  Does it make sense to run the numbers and see what our "contribution" to Edison's undercollection would be under Edison's view?  If you need another copy, let me know.  Question:  I don't know what our book looks like on this issue, but if we were to take the "netting" through a reduction in the PX credit going forward, how much of a hit would that be, particularly if we were to get the $120 MM up front?

Best,
Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Steffes, James D.
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 5:05 PM
To:	Dasovich, Jeff
Subject:	FW: Conversation with Edison re: Getting Negative CTC Paid

Jeff --

How would we calculate EES' "contribution" to SCE undercollection?

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 5:02 PM
To:	Shapiro, Richard; Steffes, James D.; Mellencamp, Lisa; Tribolet, Michael; Sanders, Richard B.; Kean, Steven J.; Sharp, Vicki; Smith, Mike; Williams, Robert C.; Curry, Wanda; Swain, Steve; Huddleson, Diann; Calger, Christopher F.; Belden, Tim; Dietrich, Janet
Subject:	Conversation with Edison re: Getting Negative CTC Paid

I talked to John Fielder (SVP Edison) about setting up a meeting for Barry Tycholiz with Edison's CFO about hedging Edison's QF price risk. Fielder wanted to talk about the negative CTC issue. Here's what he said:

They plan to "settle" with the ESPs and pay them when they pay everyone else, which he re-iterated would be sometime in Q1'02.
Edison is holding firm to the notion that the negative CTC contributed to the utility's undercollection and that the ESP's share of the undercollection has to be netted against the payables attributable to the negative CTC and owed the ESP.
He said that they will propose to net it out in one of two ways:  1) lump sum netting (i.e., if they owe $50MM and the share of the undercollection is $30 MM, then they pay the ESP $20 MM; or 2) future reductions in PX Credit (i.e., they pay the ESP $50 MM, and then reduce the PX going forward until the $30 MM is paid down).  The numbers are illustrative only.
In addition, he said that they have the view that a decision is going to have to be made about 1) whether DA customers pay for stranded costs tied to the DWR L-T contracts, and 2) whether DA customers pay going forward for stranded costs tied to the QF contracts.  (Edison is clearly lobbying the PUC to get DA customers to pay for these costs.)
I recommended strongly that he de-link issues 1 and 2 above from the issue of paying us ASAP what they owe us for negative CTC.  He agreed.
He said that the PUC judge's recently issued pre-hearing conference order requires that Edison "meet and confer" with ESPs prior to the Nov. 7th hearing, and that Edison intends to set something up with ESPs prior to that hearing.
Fielder is also the point person on "getting ESPs paid" and intends to initiate settlement discussions with ESPs week after next.
It was very clear from the conversation that Edison is going to do everything possible (at the expense of creditors) to maximize headroom under the settlement it struck with the PUC a few weeks ago.  Edison's stalemate with the QFs is evidence of it.  We shouldn't assume anything different with the Negative CTC issue.

If you have any questions, let us know.

Best,
Jeff


----- Forwarded by Stephanie Harris/Corp/Enron on 12/11/2000 10:42 AM -----

	Peter del Vecchio@ECT
	12/10/2000 12:27 PM

		 To: Stephanie Harris/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Julia Murray/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Project Canary--Memorandum for Mr. Derrick

Dear Jim,

Attached please find my memorandum regarding Project Canary to brief you inn
anticipation for the upcoming Board Meeting.

Regards,

Pete del Vecchio


Sure.  Come by my desk after cash.

-----Original Message-----
From: Lisk, Daniel
Sent: Tue 10/23/2001 4:22 PM
To: Grigsby, Mike
Cc:
Subject: Daniel Lisk

Mike,

I would like to discuss the trading track program with you when you have a few minutes.

Daniel D. Lisk
Enron North America

<<Lisk, Daniel.vcf>>


---------------------- Forwarded by Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT on 07/14/99 02:11
PM ---------------------------

Elizabeth Sager
07/13/99 03:29 PM
To: jcotner@gibbs_brun.com, sroach@gibbs_brun.com
cc:
Subject: NERC Response to TVA letter - First Draft

---------------------- Forwarded by Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT on 07/13/99 03:27
PM ---------------------------

Elizabeth Sager
07/13/99 02:10 PM
To: Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@Enron, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christi L
Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: dwatkiss@bracepatt.com, jcotner@gibbs-brun.com, sroach@gibbs-brun.com
Subject: NERC Response to TVA letter - First Draft

Attached is a first draft.  It is likely heavy handed but we can chop down
from here (don't want to scare NERC away but need to set the record
straight).


Congratulations and welcome to New England!  As you may or may not know, I'm
now living in Connecticut (small coastal town called Madison, about 15-20
miles east of New Haven) and doing my global environmental thing from here.

Please stay in touch and maybe we'll have a chance to visit once you get
settled into your new role.  Here are all my numbers below.

Jeff

Jeffrey Keeler
Director, Environmental Strategies
Enron
Washington DC office - (202) 466-9157
Connecticut Office - (203) 245-0828
Cell Phone (203) 464-1541

	Mary Hain@ECT
	03/23/2001 01:24 PM

		 To: David_Aamodt@pgn.com, dapnucc@teleport.com, dick@pnucc.org,
seabron.adamson@frontier-economics.com, Frank_Afranji@pgn.com, raa@vnf.com,
Joseph Alamo, ajaldrich@snopud.com, Jeff Alexander, Al Alexanderson@Enron,
Keonee Almaida, hollis.alpert@ferc.fed.us, Brenda Anderson, angles@howry.com,
Alan B Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, gdb@vnf.com, npbaker@bpa.gov, ellen@tca-us.com,
paulb@citizenspower.com, paulb@citizenspower.com, garybarbour@email.msn.com,
jbartus@cammckenna.com, glynda.becker@mail.house.gov, Samuel Behrends,
bbennett@bpa.gov, sberman@hewm.com, ramsen.betfarhad@mail.house.gov,
KBILAS@SKADDEN.COM, sbooye@Skadden.com, raymond.r.boyce@state.or.us,
tbradley@bracepatt.com, scott.brattebo@pacificorp.com, sbrose@steptoe.com,
sbuchheit@bracepatt.com, alanb@wutc.wa.gov, Jim Byrne,
vergil.cabasco@mail.house.gov, johncameron@dwt.com, Doug Carmichael, Ed
Cassidy, ajchambe@llgm.com, Melissa Chiechi, elchristensen@snopud.com,
kevin.clark@ci.seattle.wa.us, rcloward@avistacorp.com,
david_cohen@rniinc.com, Bill Comish, Victor Contract, powerlac@aol.com,
Frederick Coolbroth, michaelcorrigan@bchydro.bc.ca, kcorum@nwppc.org,
KCurry@bracepatt.com, Wanda Curry/HOU/EES@EES, gdahlke@paine-hamblen.com,
kadaly/atty%moheck@mcimail.com, mday@gmssr.com, dearing@chelanpud.org,
tdeboer@paine-hamblen.com, Tom_Delaney@enron.com, sdleonard@earthlink.net,
dldorrell@stoel.com, Mary Doyle, Jay Dudley, mce2280@idahopower.com,
michaelearly@earthlink.net, Katherine Edwards, rle@givenspursley.com,
imaxtrans@aol.com, Chris Elliott, sandra.elliott@ferc.fed.us,
kerwin@ect.enron.com, dezickson@mwe.com, Jim Fallon, fallonr@howrey.com,
Elias Farrah, Michele_Farrell@pgn.com, dfaulk@puget.com, gfergus@brobeck.com,
Willard Fields, sfisher@avistaenergy.com, pfox@bracepatt.com, Pat Franklin,
John Frazzell, ericf@prestongates.com, don.furman@pacificorp.com,
segfurst@bpa.gov, Jackie Gallagher, craiggannett@dwt.com, Alvaro
Garcia/LON/ECT@ECT, sbishop@gibbs-bruns.com, wgibson@nwppc.org,
ggilbert@ci.tacoma.wa.us, Pat Gilman, Alex Goldberg,
jlgreene@energyadvocates.com, Chris_Groener@mail.house.gov, Mary Groggin,
Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen Hall, steve.c.hall@enron.com, Leo
Hamblin, whannaford@NWPPC.org, jim.harding@ci.seattle.wa.us,
rhardy@hardyenergy.com, kharri@puget.com, Steve_Hawke@pgn.com,
dhawkins@caiso.com, marc.hellman@state.or.us, Scott Helyer,
mhenry@bracepatt.com, dwmp@teleport.com, rhornby@tca-us.com, mhornst@aol.com,
dhuard@jmbm.com, Marlene Huntsinger@pgn.com, cfi1@tca-us.com, Richard
Ingersoll/HOU/ECT@ECT, pljacklin@stoel.com, montrey@aol.com, danj@cfmdc.com,
kgjohnson@bpa.gov, ljohnson@pwrteam.com, Karen E Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT,
mkanner@kannerandassoc.com, karid@perkinscoie.com, pkaufma@ect.enron.com,
Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey Keeler/Corp/Enron@Enron @ Enron, Devon
Kehoe <devon_kehoe@mentorg.com>, James Keller, Joe.Kelliher@mail.house.gov,
kkennedy@bdbc.com, Rick Kessler, rdking@bpa.gov, Harry Kingerski/HOU/EES@EES,
Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, rsk@schwabe.com, gwilliams8@austin.rr.com,
John Klauberg, Holli Krebs/HOU/ECT@ECT, ekrogh@wiredweb.com,
blafferty@avistacorp.com, wdlamb@bpa.gov, John Lamb, Therese Lamb,
srlarson@bpa.gov, Cindy_Tatham@co.washington.or.us, zora.lazic@bchydro.com,
kaleathley@bpa.gov, pamela_lesh@pgn.com, Debi LeVine, lcg@europa.com,
doug.little@powerex.com, Robert Loeffler, Chris Long, sjlong@bpa.gov,
rlopezv@www.conet.com.mx, david_lucio@iep.illinova.com,
king.lum@bchydro.bc.ca, kevin.lynch@pacificorp.com, Mark Maehr, Randal T
Maffett/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Malowney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sueyen Mao, Susan J
Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@Enron, Lee Martin@Enron,
maurw@perkinscoie.com, Wayne Mays/PDX/ECT@ECT, Michael McCall/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Travis McCullough/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael
McDonald, brugen@erols.com, mckinley@wpuda.org, mcm@vnf.com,
mcnichol@wapa.com, shauna@pnucc.org, Maureen McVicker,
pmeringolo@brobeck.com, demetcalf@bpa.gov, cemeyer@bpa.gov,
jmilegich@sppc.com, fred_miller@pgn.com, Jeffrey Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT,
jerry.miller@pacificorp.com, Laura Miller, scott.miller@ferc.fed.us, Bill
Miner, phil_moeller@gorton.senate.gov, pmohler@hewm.com, emoler@velaw.com,
nkmorgado@bpa.gov, Mike@tonkon.com, krmoxness@bpa.gov, mmps@millcreeklaw.com,
pmurphy@mbllp.com, terrym@millcreeklaw.com, bmurtha@acy.sunint.com, Rich
Nassief, tod@mgninc.com, Douglas_Nichols@pgn.com, Patty Nichols, Christi
Nicolay, tmnoguchi@bpa.gov, darcy@tonkon.com, Sarah Novasel@sarah
novosel/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tom O'Donnell,
PObenchain@idahopower.com, Pegy Olds, Carol Opatrny, tpaine@avistacorp.com,
Dave Parquet, bpascoe@mtpower.com, afpaschke@bpa.gov, ccperigo@bpa.gov,
wlpernas@stoel.com, lpeters@pacifier.com, jill@pnucc.org, Mona L
Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, npickover@bracepatt.com, Phillip
Platter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alfred Pollard/HOU/ECT@ECT, Walt Pollock@Enron,
gporter@sppc.com, Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, jquint@puget.com,
arlene.ragozin@ci.seattle.wa.us, maraschio@bpa.gov, Dale
Rasmussen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Rasmussen, Bobby Reeves/PDX/ECT@ECT,
preiten@pngc.com, reyna2r@kochind.com, shellyr@pacifier.com, Jeff
Richter/HOU/ECT@ECT, raroach@bpa.gov, atrodrigues@bpa.gov, rarogers@bpa.gov,
peterroi@erols.com, Rothfelder@rlo-law.com, Richard Sanders,
jsaven@pacifier.com, Michael Schilmoeller/PDX/ECT@ECT,
jschlect@avistacorp.com, Sabine.Schnittger@frontier-economics.com, Diana
Scholtes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Roger Seifert, Cara Semperger, asettanni@bracepatt.com,
Richard Shapiro, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Joshua
Sheinkman, jshurts@nwppc.org,  Sid, msizer@ci.tacoma.wa.us,
slavens.paula@deps.ppl.com, small@wrightlaw.com, small@wrightlaw.com,
douglas.smith@ferc.fed.us, Mike Smith, Roger Smith, Larry
Soderquist/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harvey Spigal, mstauffer@mtpower.com, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron,
mestewardpsedc@worldnet.att.net, JKStier@BPA.gov, rbstrong@paine-hamblen.com,
DASwanstrom@Verner.com, Mike Swerzbin/HOU/ECT@ECT, tabors@tca-us.com, Ron
Tapscott/HOU/ECT@ect @ ECT, James K Tarpey/DEN/ECT@ECT, Jake Thomas,
ryan_thomas@burns.senate.gov, jrt2058@idahopower.com, maryann@pnucc.org,
mtierney@sempra.com, robin_tompkins@pgn.com, Ann Tumlinson, AW Turner, Sheila
Tweed, Lisa Urick, rvermeers@avistacorp.com, Frank W Vickers/HOU/ECT@ECT,
John Walley, kristiwallis@sprintmail.com, walshl@howrey.com,
swalton@enron.com, Steve Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT, kaward@bpa.gov, Kim
Ward/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol Wardell, dwatkiss@bracepatt.com, sawatson@bpa.gov,
judy.welch@NWPP.ORG, 211-6155@MCIMAIL.COM, Kwenzel@zzz.com,
cwestadt@sppc.com, Brian Whalen, Bill Williams/PDX/ECT@ECT,
klwmtp@worldnet.att.net, lyn_williams@pgn.com, Greg Wolfe@ECT, Vickie
Wolk-Laniewski@Enron, Ed Wood/HOU/ECT@ECT, mwood@stoel.com, Steve Wright,
Teresa L Wright/HOU/ECT@ECT,  WSCC, Charles Yeung, Christian
Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Steve Kean, Travel in the
Park, D Brett Hunsucker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carla Hoffman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Bernadette
Hawkins, Joe Hartsoe@Enron, Donna Fulton, Roger Fragua/HOU/ECT@ECT, James B
Fallon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael Etringer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Terry W
Donovan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy Dickson@ECT, Ginger Dernehl/HOU/EES@EES, Rhonda L
Denton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Sean Crandall/PDX/ECT@ECT @
ECT, Tom Briggs/NA/Enron@Enron, t.briggs@enron.com, Stacey Bolton, Dennis
Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT,  Alan Comnes, Lysa
Akin/PDX/ECT@ECT, Portland West Desk, assad@elektro.com.br, Alan
Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Alberto Levy/SA/Enron@Enron, Aleck Dadson/TOR/ECT@ECT,
Allison Navin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Amy Fabian/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Barbara A
Hueter/NA/Enron@Enron, Bernadette Hawkins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bill
Moore/NA/Enron@Enron, cristinah@elektro.com.br, Carlos Gustavo
Azevedo/SA/Enron@Enron, Carmen Perez/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Carolyn Cooney/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Charles Yeung/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chauncey
Hood/NA/Enron@ENRON, Chris Long/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Christi L
Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cynthia Sandherr/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Damon
Harvey/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Dan Staines/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daniel
Allegretti/NA/Enron@Enron, Dave Mangskau/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Donald
Lassere/NA/Enron@Enron, Donna Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Eidy
Catala/TRANSREDES@TRANSREDES, Elizabeth Linnell/NA/Enron@Enron, Frank
Rishe/NA/Enron@Enron, Geriann Warner/NA/Enron@Enron, Ginger
Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron, Gisele S Braz/SA/Enron@Enron, Gloria
Ogenyi/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Guillermo Canovas/SA/Enron@Enron,
Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Howard Fromer/NA/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Janine Migden/NA/Enron@Enron, Javier
Pantoja/TRANSREDES@TRANSREDES, Jean R Dressler/NA/Enron@Enron, Jean
Ryall/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Brown/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeffrey Keeler/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joao
Paixao/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Joe Allen/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe
Connor/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joe
Hillings/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jose Bestard/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron@Enron, Kathleen Sullivan/NA/Enron@ENRON, Kerry
Stroup/NA/Enron@Enron, Kikumi Kishigami/NA/Enron@Enron, Kirsten
Bellas/NA/Enron@Enron, Lara Leibman/NA/Enron@Enron, Laurie
Knight/NA/Enron@Enron, Leslie Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda J
Noske/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Lindsay
Meade/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Lisa Yoho/NA/Enron@Enron, Lora
Sullivan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Luiz Maurer/SA/Enron@Enron, Lysa Akin/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Marchris Robinson/NA/Enron@Enron, Marcia A Linton/NA/Enron@Enron, Marcie
Milner/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Maureen
McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron, Melinda Pharms/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michelle
Belzak/TOR/ECT@ECT, Mona L Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, Nancy
Hetrick/NA/Enron@Enron, Patrick Keene/NA/Enron@Enron, Ray
Alvarez/TRANSREDES@TRANSREDES, Rebecca W Cantrell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ricardo
Charvel/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Ingersoll/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Robert Frank/NA/Enron@Enron, Robert
Hemstock/CAL/ECT@ECT, Robert Neustaedter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Robin Kittel/NA/Enron@Enron, Ron McNamara/NA/Enron@Enron, Roy
Boston/HOU/EES@EES, Rubena Buerger/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott
Bolton/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Sergio
Assad/SA/Enron@Enron, Stella Chan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Stephen D Burns/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steve Montovano/NA/Enron@Enron, Steve
Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Sue Nord/NA/Enron@Enron,
Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Susan M Landwehr/NA/Enron@Enron, Terri
Miller/NA/Enron@Enron, Thane Twiggs/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Tom
Briggs/NA/Enron@Enron, Tom Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Delaney/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Tom Hoatson/NA/Enron@Enron, Tracy Cooper/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Valeria Lima/SA/Enron@Enron, Vinio Floris/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Xi Xi/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeffrey Keeler/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Christi L
Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robert
Frank/NA/Enron@Enron, Lara Leibman/NA/Enron@Enron, Gloria
Ogenyi/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron,
Leslie Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Aleck
Dadson/TOR/ECT@ECT, Daniel Allegretti/NA/Enron@Enron, Howard
Fromer/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Roy Boston/HOU/EES@EES,
Janine Migden/NA/Enron@Enron, Christie Patrick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jane
Wilson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rhonda L Denton/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Kathleen E Magruder/HOU/EES@EES, Susan T Covino/HOU/EES@EES, Rebecca
Carter/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Shelley Corman/ET&S/Enron, Janet Butler/ET&S/Enron,
Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brad Richter/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Greg Piper/Corp/Enron, Kevin McGowan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kim
Ward/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: I'm Leaving Enron

I am going to be the Senior Regulatory Counsel at ISO New England starting on
April 9, 2001.   My last day in the Portland area will be March 31, 2001.  I
enjoyed working with you and wish you the best of everything.  My new address
will be:

Mary Hain
Senior Regulatory Counsel
ISO New England Inc.
One Sullivan Road
Holyoke, MA  01040-2841
(413) 535-4000
mhain@ISO-NE.com


-----Original Message-----
From: Joseph.Delaney@morganstanley.com
[mailto:Joseph.Delaney@morganstanley.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 12:50 PM
To: Belden, Tim
Cc: Thomas Funk
Subject: MARK REQUEST.xls

Hi Tim,
Attached is a spreadsheet which contains Morgan Stanley's marks for our
positions with Enron in PV, Mead, and 4 Corners for Wednesday Nov 6th.  As I
mentioned in our phone conversation, we are trying to get to the bottom of a
$2mm mark discrepancy between our firms.  If you could drop in your marks for
Nov 6th in the spreadsheet and send it back to me, I would appreciate it.
Thanks again.

                                                            Joe Delaney


give me 3 dates (very soon) and promise that you won't cancel, change, modify, reschedule, delay, postpone, or amend.  I'll find out which one works.

when you leaving for NYC?  the movie sounded VERY funny (from the riotous laughter i heard).  and those menus really do look good--maybe you could get by by giving your mom that piece of things (with your OK, of course) and that would make her feel like she's got a chunk of the event and it could leave you guys with the freedom to do all the other stuff.  just a thought.

i'm very excited but not altogether hungry.

best,
Jeff

-----Original Message-----
From: Cameron Sellers [mailto:cameron@perfect.com]
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 1:48 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: RE: Meeting with Perfect Commerce

Have you heard anything back on potential dates to meet.  I am in NY until
November 11th, so any date after that would be great!

Sorry you couldn't watch the movie last night - it was pretty funny.

Hope you are excited about the meat pie for dinner.  Won't that be a
treat???

-C

Cameron Sellers
Vice President, Business Development
PERFECT
1860 Embarcadero Road - Suite 210
Palo Alto, CA 94303
cameron@perfect.com
650.798.3366 (direct dial)
650.269.3366 (cell)
650.858.1095 (fax)

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Wednesday, September 26, 2001 1:57 PM
To:	Piper, Greg; Richter, Brad
Subject:	Meeting with Perfect Commerce

Greg:
Good talking to you.  Congratulations on your new role.  Sounds exciting
(in addition to exhausting).

Based on our call, I contacted Perfect Commerce.  The two folks from
their shop that will be in Houston are:

Ian Sullivan
SVP, Professional Services and all implementation of the product

Cameron Sellers
VP, Business Development

They'd like to meet sometime during the week of October 15th. Let me
know if that works for you and Brad.  Or if you'd like to contact them
directly, just let me know and I'll get you their numbers/emails.

I ran across Perfect when I was doing an MBA project--we were required
to find a company that we could consult to on e-commerce strategy.

I've since found out that Perfect's doing a pilot with EES--acting as
the e-procurment platform for products tied to EES' outsourcing deals.
From what I hear it's going well, and EES is enthusiastic.

The technology is very interesting:  soup to nuts e-procurement platform
developed by Paul Milgrom (global auction guru and economist at
Stanford).  Glad you guys can meet with them.  I think it's definitely
worth the time--the technology may fit very well with Networks.

Best,
Jeff

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Since it was only Friday since Delainey directed me to send info directly to
him, I included him and the others on the last note in order to avoid looking
like I was disobeying direct orders 48 hours after receiving them.  Hopefully
we can work something out where you distribute as you deem fit.  Hope it's
not creating undue headaches.

Best,
Jeff


Attached, per your request, you will find the priorities for Mexico this
year.  I still need to do a valuation exercise with the help of mi amigo
Jaime Steffes.

Saludos,

Ricardo


This is a copy of your message sent to Greenamber5@talkmatch.com -->

Hello,

I ran across your picture and profile and was very impressed.  I sent along my profile, take a look and see if there is any interest.  I'd sure like to hear back from you.

Click the following link to view the sender's profile:
http://www.match.com/doubleblind/showprofile.asp?UserID=484948454C4B4E&trackingid=65685

The following is my profile text:

Hello, I'm a down to earth person that likes to laugh and have a good time. I work in downtown Denver as a commodities trader for a large energy trading house. I do enjoy my career but understand life needs to be kept in prospective and be balanced. I enjoy activities over sitting and watching, but I have been known to sit in front of the TV and watch football or college basketball all day. I'm looking for someone who enjoys life and doesn't take themselves too seriously.

*********************************************************

ADDITIONAL TIPS from Match.com:

Our anonymous re-mailer will strip away your real email address, so
that it will NOT appear in the 'From:' line.

You may also contact this person from their Match.com profile by
clicking 'Contact this person' and composing your message directly from the
site.

However:

* Check to ensure that your email address is not in the BODY of your
message as we are unable to remove these.

* Check to ensure that you REMOVE ANY AUTOMATIC SIGNATURE at the end of

your email. And note that you cannot use 'Cc:' or 'Bcc:' if you want
your email to remain anonymous.

Match.com does not monitor private email between members, nor are we
liable for the content of these messages. All members are bound by our
Match.com Service Agreement.


Ditto Credit.

	Tana Jones@ECT
	06/06/2001 08:06 AM

		 To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie
Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marcus Nettelton/NA/Enron@ENRON, Harry M
Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Robbi
Rossi/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, John
Viverito/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jane McBride/AP/Enron@Enron, Andrea
Calo/SA/Enron@Enron, Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: EOL Approvals: 06-05-01

----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 06/06/2001 08:06 AM -----

	Wendi Lebrocq/ENRON@enronXgate
	06/05/2001 05:19 PM

		 To: Karen Lambert/ENRON@enronXgate, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel
Schott/ENRON@enronXgate, Brant Reves/ENRON@enronXgate, Debbie R
Brackett/ENRON@enronXgate, Cynthia Clark/ENRON@enronXgate, Enron Europe
Global CounterParty/LON/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/ENRON@enronXgate, Tom
Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Claudia Clark/ENRON@enronXgate, William S
Bradford/ENRON@enronXgate, Lisa Lees/ENRON@enronXgate, Juana
Fayett/ENRON@enronXgate, Jana Morse/Corp/Enron@Enron, Trang
Le/ENRON@enronXgate, Paul Maley/Enron@EUEnronXGate, Sonya Clarke/LON/ECT@ECT,
Tim Davies/LON/ECT@ECT, Karen O'Day/ENRON@enronXgate, Tanya
Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Kelly Lombardi/ENRON@enronXgate, Brian
Lindsay/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, EOL Call Center@ECT, Bill
D Hare/ENRON@enronXgate, Amy Heffernan/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Molly LaFuze/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Danny
Clark/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Stephanie
Panus/NA/Enron@Enron, Teresa Mandola/ENRON@enronXgate, Bill
Kyle/ENRON@enronXgate, Amber Ebow/ENRON@enronXgate, Thu Pham
Arnold/ENRON@enronXgate, Tandra Coleman/ENRON@enronXgate, Lesli
Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate, Wendi Lebrocq/ENRON@enronXgate, Mark
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: EOL Approvals: 06-05-01

Please see attached

Regards,

Wendi LeBrocq
3-3835


Some of you may have entered updates to your personal information in eHRonline from Friday, March 1 through Monday, March 4.  However, we experienced some problems with the HR system during this time, and it is likely that certain updates were lost.  If you made an update during this period, please return to eHRonline and review your information particularly for the following four categories:
Banking information for direct deposit
Tax W-4 information
Home address
Emergency contact

Note that the first three categories above are related to payroll.  We are processing payroll for March 15.  If updates are needed for your March 15 paycheck, please eMail your update and P # to "HR Service Connection" before 11 a.m. on Thursday, March 7 for immediate processing.  Put "eHRonline Update" in the subject line and send as urgent so we can expedite processing.

For any updates applicable for future paychecks or non-payroll related, please re-enter your information directly in eHRonline.

Thanks and we apologize for the inconvenience.


Drew -- I've looked at this and it is fine; really does not deviate from what
we have posted before.

One issue that arose Friday was whether our all-or-nothing approach (i.e.,
shipper must take all 49,000 dth of capacity or none at all -- or all 20,000
or none at all) constitutes tying.  The 49,000 package includes 35,000 to
North Needles and 14,000 to Topock.  So if a shipper wants the Needles space
it has to take the Topock space too.  This looked like a clear case of tying
to me until I remembered that this capacity is now, and has been, posted and
available and any shipper can bid on any part of the Needles space right now
if they wanted to and we'd sell it to them without making them take the
Topock space.  That'll be true during the IOS too -- i.e., nothing can stop
shippers from bidding on the Needles space outside of the IOS process.  This
is just a situation in which we're putting a special package together with
the expectation that the price will reflect the fact that the less desirable
Topock space is part of that package.

Does this make sense to you?  If not, give me a call.

	From:  Drew Fossum                           07/17/2000 01:35 PM

To: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Transwestern IOS Approval Request

pls let me know if this looks ok to you.  thanks df
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 07/17/2000
01:30 PM ---------------------------

Christine Stokes
07/17/2000 10:28 AM
To: Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay
Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Glen Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary
Darveaux/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bill Cordes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron

Subject: Transwestern IOS Approval Request

TRANSWESTERN PIPELINE COMPANY
INTERACTIVE OPEN SEASON
APPROVAL REQUEST

Please review the attached file for the announcement of Transwestern's
Interactive Open Season (IOS) to be held Friday, July 21, 2000.  The
following summarizes the bidding rules and capacity definition for the two
bid packages of East of Thoreau (EOT) to California capacity:

 Package 1:
 Volume: 20,000 Dth/d
 Term:  3 months (August - October, 2000)
 Path:  East of Thoreau to California.  Maximum available delivery capacity
   of 12,000 Dth/d at Needles, Ca.  Remaining may be chosen between
   PG&E and Mojave.

Package 2:
 Volume: 49,000 Dth/d
 Term:  12 Months (November 1, 2000 - Oct. 31, 2001)
 Path:  East of Thoreau to California.  Maximum available delivery capacity
   of 35,000 Dth/d at Needles, Cal.  Remaining may be chosen between
   PG&E and Mojave.

Bidders may bid on either a 1-part or a 2-part rate structure for the entire
capacity amount posted.   No partial volume bids are accepted.  Bid packages
are considered mutually exclusive.     No minimum bid rate is posted
therefore Transwestern is not obligated to accept any bids if the bids are
valued as unacceptable.  Transwestern shall award capacity based upon Highest
Rate criteria.

If any questions arise please contact Christine Stokes at x35702.

Please indicated approval via REPLY WITH HISTORY.


Clem:

Attached to the end of this string of emails is the Bear, Stearns & Co.
("Bear") form of guaranty.  My only issue is with Section 1.  Consents,
Waivers and Renewals of the Bear guaranty which Bear insists upon .  Although
Bear will agree to the Enron form of guaranty,  our Par. 4 Setoffs and
Counterclaims problematic in light of Bear's waiver provision.  I'd like to
discuss with you.

ENA has agreed to a Securities Lending arrangement with Bear and the ENE
guaranty (capped at $25million and restricted to ENA's arrangements with
Bear) is part of that "package".

FYI, several Enron companies have accounts with Bear.

When do you think we could discuss?

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 02/08/2001 12:53 PM -----

	Paul Radous@ENRON
	01/10/2001 08:13 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Bear Stearns Guarantee. I'll call to follow up tomorrow a.m.

I suppose you ought to have a look at this as well?
---------------------- Forwarded by Paul Radous/Corp/Enron on 01/10/2001
08:14 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Sheila Glover @ ECT                           01/10/2001 07:40 AM

To: Paul Radous/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Jeff Kinneman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Doukas/NA/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Bear Stearns Guarantee. I'll call to follow up tomorrow a.m.

Paul,
I sent our Letter of Guaranttee form to Bear Stearns.  They have forwarded
theirs to me.  Russ Miron, Bear Stearns, is supposed to call this morning.  I
will try to conference you in when I receive his call or we will reschedule.
Thanks. Sheila
---------------------- Forwarded by Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT on 01/10/2001 07:33
AM ---------------------------

"Miron, Russel (Exchange)" <rmiron@bear.com> on 01/09/2001 07:05:10 PM
To: "'sheila.glover@enron.com'" <sheila.glover@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Bear Stearns Guarantee. I'll call to follow up tomorrow a.m.

 - Guaranty_CWTFinal Form.doc

***********************************************************************
Bear Stearns is not responsible for any recommendation, solicitation,
offer or agreement or any information about any transaction, customer
account or account activity contained in this communication.
***********************************************************************


Brent, Andrea and I had a "status" conversation this afternoon.  Brent will
go to Sao Paulo on July 20 to meet with Andrea, Randy and commercial people.
Andrea has requested that you and I go to Brazil after July 28 when the
outside lawyer is back from vacation.  In general, the three of us are
conforming and updating physical resolutions (final and proposed) and
identifying additional research necessary to address the financial trading
issues.  These are related to specific deals originating in Brazil (which are
truly settled financially, e.g., a purported prepay where no physical
commodity was to be delivered) and issues arising here in Houston (e.g., the
Hickerson request for fixed income, FX and equity trading).  Brent will be
discussing pending transaction structures while in Sao Paulo.

It appears  that Brent is the "point person" for dealing directly with the
Sao Paulo office and he will bring me in as necessary (although I will be
dealing frequently with Andrea).


NETWORK WORLD NEWSLETTER: JEB BOLDING on
APPLICATION SERVICE PROVIDERS
01/09/02
Today's focus: Closeness and trust

Dear Wincenty Kaminski,

In this issue:

* Physical proximity and branding are top selection criteria
* Links related to ASPs
* Featured reader resource

_______________________________________________________________
WEBINAR: SUCCESSFULLY INTEGRATING YOUR NEXT GENERATION OSS
APPLICATIONS

Tune into this Webinar from RiverSoft/Network World and
discover how integrating your OSS can maximize network
availability, increase revenues and improve customer
satisfaction. Learn more now.
http://nww1.com/go/0107river18C.html

_______________________________________________________________
Today's focus: Closeness and trust

By Jeb Bolding

It's becoming apparent that in the future users will choose
service providers based upon their physical proximity and the
level of trust they inspire.

Customers want to see and touch their service provider. No
doubt customers will want to take advantage of distributed
applications. However, they also want a representative of the
service provider to be local to them, so that they can have
someone on site if there is a problem or if some planning
within the enterprise needs to take into consideration the
relationship with the provider.

The level of trust is related to branding. Right or wrong,
service provider users are concerned with the viability of
their potential partners. Seasoned service providers that have
name recognition will have the upper hand against their lesser-
known brethren. Smaller service providers could potentially
offer better products, better features, better support, and
better service-level agreements than bigger providers. But in
the market today, that probably won't make much of a
difference.

Newer, smaller providers face the dilemma of spending money
that they don't have on marketing and promotions that they need
in order to acquire additional customers and funding.

In studies Enterprise Management Associates has conducted over
the past year, the key rationales behind choosing a provider
have shifted from monetary concerns to trust-based concerns.
EMA has found that name recognition is the primary criterion
used to select among service providers that offer relatively
equal sets of features - even at the expense of cost. Following
name recognition is a local presence maintained by the service
provider.

It's probably apparent that these key criteria are also the
same bases for choosing traditional outsourcing providers. This
is why I have argued that service providers that have either a
systems integrator arm or a channel of systems integrators have
a particular strength over competitors.

I expect, then, that over time we'll see either more direct
entrants into the provider market from IBM and others, or
indirect entrants from companies such as Ernst & Young. These
companies already have tight partnerships with one or two
service providers that have already spent the necessary
millions to build out their infrastructure.

_______________________________________________________________
To contact Jeb Bolding:

Jeb Bolding is senior consultant with Enterprise Management
Associates in Boulder, Colo., an analyst and market research
firm focusing exclusively on enterprise management. Bolding has
10 years of experience in the network systems industry, most
recently with eCollege.com, an ASP for higher education, where
he was director of product development. He can be reached at
mailto:jbolding@enterprisemanagement.com.
_______________________________________________________________
Register your company on Buy IT, NW Fusion's Vendor Directory
and RFP Center and generate new business quick and easy!
Promote your brand across our network and access millions of
dollars in RFPs.  It's the most efficient way to connect with
buyers of IT services.  Get listed now!
http://www.nwfusion.newmediary.com/091201nwwprovnwltr2
_______________________________________________________________
RELATED EDITORIAL LINKS

Lesson learned: Have a back-up outsourcing plan
Network World, 01/07/02
http://www.nwfusion.com/news/2002/128499_01-07-2002.html

Breaking ASP news from Network World, updated daily:
http://www.nwfusion.com/topics/asp.html

Archive of the ASP newsletter:
http://www.nwfusion.com/newsletters/asp/index.html
______________________________________________________________
FEATURED READER RESOURCE

Network World Fusion's The Edge site

Network World Fusion's The Edge is a resource devoted to the
advances in service-provider networks that are shaking up the
old telecom order. In classic Network World fashion, we focus
on the hardware, software and services coming to market - but
this time from the vendors targeting legacy carriers, new
alternative local carriers, ISPs and application service
providers. http://www.nwfusion.com/edge/index.html
_______________________________________________________________
May We Send You a Free Print Subscription?
You've got the technology snapshot of your choice delivered
at your fingertips each day. Now, extend your knowledge by
receiving 51 FREE issues to our print publication. Apply
today at http://www.nwwsubscribe.com/nl
_______________________________________________________________
SUBSCRIPTION SERVICES

To subscribe or unsubscribe to any Network World e-mail
newsletters, go to:
http://www.nwwsubscribe.com/news/scripts/notprinteditnews.asp

To unsubscribe from promotional e-mail go to:
http://www.nwwsubscribe.com/ep

To change your e-mail address, go to:
http://www.nwwsubscribe.com/news/scripts/changeemail.asp

Subscription questions? Contact Customer Service by replying to
this message.

Have editorial comments? Write Jeff Caruso, Newsletter Editor,
at: mailto:jcaruso@nww.com

For advertising information, write Jamie Kalbach, Director of
Online Sales, at: mailto:jkalbach@nww.com

Copyright Network World, Inc., 2002

------------------------
This message was sent to:  vkamins@enron.com


Return-Path: <chonawee@umich.edu>
Received: from  rly-xc01.mx.aol.com (rly-xc01.mail.aol.com [172.20.105.134]) by air-xc01.mail.aol.com (v82.22) with ESMTP id MAILINXC17-1221074608; Fri, 21 Dec 2001 07:46:08 -0500
Received: from  changeofhabit.mr.itd.umich.edu (changeofhabit.mr.itd.umich.edu [141.211.144.17]) by rly-xc01.mx.aol.com (v83.18) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINXC14-1221074535; Fri, 21 Dec 2001 07:45:35 -0500
Received: from OPTIMAL (cs2428111-124.houston.rr.com [24.28.111.124])	by changeofhabit.mr.itd.umich.edu (8.9.3/3.2r) with SMTP id HAA12873; Fri, 21 Dec 2001 07:45:34 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <010301c18a1d$1d426620$7c6f1c18@OPTIMAL>
From: "Chonawee Supatgiat" <chonawee@umich.edu>
To: <VKaminski@aol.com>, <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
Subject: summay letters of recommendation
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 06:43:38 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;	boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0100_01C189EA.D20F3890"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000

Hi Vince,

Thank you again for being my reference. If you  remember you wrote one letter for me already for my greencard application. So  you might want to refer to it to save your time. Here is the  list of schools that I am applying.

1)        Northwestern  IE&MS
2)        UC Berkley  IEOR
3)        Stanford  MS&Eng Information Science and Technology
4)        Stanford  MS&Eng Production & Operations Management
5)        Princeton  OR&FE
6)        Cornell  OR&IE
7)        U.of.Wisconsin,  Madison IE
8)        Purdue  IE
9)        UT Austin  OR&IE

and  business schools
1)        U. of  Michigan Business school
2)        Stanford  Business school
3)        University  Of California, Berkeley Business school
4)        Duke  Fuqua

Some  schools will contact you directly for the reference letter. There are seven  schools, however, that we need to send the reference letters to them. Please  send them at your earliest convenient. I am truly sorry for this rush. I was  busy on job searching to find a new company to sponsor my visa so I did not have  time to prepare the academic applications.

Deadline:  ASAP:  Please send the  reference letter at your earliest convenient.

1)        Stanford  Business School

Please email Letters of  Recommendation as either PDF files or MS Word documents to  faculty_recruiter@gsb.stanford.edu.

2)        Stanford  MS&Eng Production & Operations Management:

Professor Hau  Lee
Department of Management Science  & Engineering
Terman Engineering Center, Room  350
Stanford  University
Stanford, CA  94305-4026

3)        Purdue IE:

Professor N.  Prabhu
Chair, Industrial Engineering  Faculty Search Committee
1287 Grissom  Hall
Purdue  University
West Lafayette, IN  47907-1287

4)        Northwestern  IE&MS:

Prof. Mark S. Daskin
Chairman,  Faculty Recruiting Committee
Department of Industrial Engineering and  Management Sciences
Northwestern University
Evanston, IL  60208-3119

Deadline:  1/15/02

5)        Stanford  MS&Eng Information Science and Technology:

Chair of  the IST Search Committee
c/o Pat  Emslie, Search Coordinator
Department  of Management Science & Engineering
350  Terman Engineering Center
Stanford  University
Stanford,  CA 94305-4026

6)        UC  Berkley IEOR:

Search  Committee Chair
Department  of Industrial Engineering & Operations Research
University  of California
4135  Etcheverry Hall
Berkeley,  CA 94720-1777
Telephone:  (510) 642-5484
FAX:  (510) 642-1403

7)        Cornell  OR&IE

Faculty Search  Committee,
School of ORIE, Rhodes Hall,
Cornell University,
Ithaca, NY 14853.

Thank  you very much, Vince. I really appreciate it.
-Chonawee.


Any GCP adjustments will be highlighted in red.

Rgds.

Samuel x3-9890
Enron Net Works _ GCP

From: Walter Guidroz/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/26/2001 03:49 PM
To: Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel
Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/ENRON@enronXgate,
Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli
Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate, Cynthia Clark/ENRON@enronXgate, Enron Europe
Global Contracts and Facilities@ENRON, Enron Europe Global
CounterParty/LON/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom
Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Claudia Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S
Bradford/ENRON@enronXgate, Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Juana
Fayett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jana Morse/Corp/Enron@Enron, Trang Le/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Paul Maley/LON/ECT@ECT, Sonya Clarke/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim Davies/LON/ECT@ECT,
Karen O'Day/NA/Enron@Enron, Tanya Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Kelly
Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron, Brian Lindsay/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, EOL Call Center@ENRON, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill D
Hare/HOU/ECT@ect, Amy Heffernan/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Molly LaFuze/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Danny Clark/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications
cc:
Subject: EOL approvals, 03-26-01

Please see attached.


Check it out
 ABU - CATALOGUE AUTEURS
The On-Line Books Page

 Dark Conspiracy v2.1


Mitch,

Please provide this information to Benjamin Rogers.   I am on vacation this
week and don't have access to the data.

Thanks,
Rick

---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Broussard/Corp/Enron on
11/20/2000 07:52 AM ---------------------------

Benjamin Rogers@ECT
11/19/2000 02:59 PM
To: Richard Broussard/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject:

Rick:
Here is the file with the performance data we worked on for the 2000's.  A
Brownsville tab has been added - could you please assist us in putting this
data together for Brownsville.  Please give me a call if you have any
questions.  Thanks!
Ben


Sam:  A couple of items from the meeting for you to follow up on:

(1)  Call the hedge funds to track execution (Ospraie, Tutor, Lawhill, etc.)
(2)  Call Mieco
(3)  Call Small Ventures
(4)  Call Texla Energy Management
(5)  Where do we stand on FirstEnergy?

Please be sure that the legal/credit meeting is on your calendar.  Thanks.
Sara


Here is the pager number that has been setup via Jim Irvine.

email:    8776804806@skytel.com
Direct dial:
800 dial: 1-800-759-8352 box# 877-680-4806

I can be reached at this pager if you need to get me ASAP.

Ravi.


Shelley,

Linda Corredor sent me home with a casserole for you and your family.

Is there a time this evening when it would convenient for me to deliver?
How about before dinner???

  ... Nancy


Great work.  Any indication that the publication of the Stanley investigation
is having any adverse effect?
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 11/26/2000 08:56 AM -----

	Richard Shapiro
	11/26/2000 07:53 AM

		 To: Robert Hemstock/CAL/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: Update - Proposed Alberta Power Pool Rule Changes

Great news and congrats!

Robert Hemstock@ECT
11/26/2000 01:19 AM
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Aleck Dadson/TOR/ECT@ECT

Subject: Update - Proposed Alberta Power Pool Rule Changes

Rick,

You will recall Steve Kean participated in a conference call on Nov 14 with
John Lavorato et al to discuss emergency Pool Rule changes that the Power
Pool intended to implement in two days.  We developed a 5 point action plan
to deal with the proposed Power Pool rule changes that would have a
significant impact on the value of Enron's PPA investment in Alberta.
By way of update to Steve, you may wish to brief him that: 1) It appears the
Power Pool will not proceed with the rule change designed to exclude
importers from setting pool price.  They will proceed with dispatch risk rule
changes but we have given input on those too and I am optimistic that Enron
will be able to live with these rule changes, the final wording of which we
should see on Monday, 2) We  have set up a meeting with the Minister of
Resource Development (you, Rob Milnthorp and I will attend) on December 11 to
encourage the Alberta Government to stay the course, and 3) This week we will
finalize our "Lessons from other Jurisdictions" document (that Steve sent me
materials to include in) and will provide it to the Alberta Government and
Power Pool and then follow up with them.

---------------------- Forwarded by Robert Hemstock/CAL/ECT on 11/25/2000
11:52 PM ---------------------------

Robert Hemstock
11/25/2000 11:53 PM
To: Rob Milnthorp/CAL/ECT@ECT, Derek Davies/CAL/ECT@ECT, John
Zufferli/CAL/ECT@ECT, Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: aleck.trawick@blakes.com, dpef@blakes.com, Aleck Dadson/TOR/ECT@ECT
Subject: Update - Proposed Alberta Power Pool Rule Changes

The attached memo provides an update on the status of the Power Pool's
further consideration of the proposed rule changes.  In summary, it appears
the Pool will not proceed with the proposal to exclude import offers from
setting pool price but will recommend a rule that reduces ability of
suppliers to become price takers on volumes that were originally priced too
high to clear the merit order.  I will receive more specifics on the dispatch
risk rule change on Monday.

Regards,

Rob


Forwarded at request of Joe Hillings:

---------------------- Forwarded by Lora Sullivan/Corp/Enron on 12/10/99
12:03 PM ---------------------------

"Robert C. Fisher" <RCFisher@HillsandCo.Com> on 12/10/99 10:48:15 AM
To: Joe Hillings/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: "Carla A. Hills" <CAHills@HillsandCo.com>, Erin Endean
<EMEndean@hillsandco.com>, "Edward A. Casey, Jr." <EACasey@HillsandCo.com>

Subject: WTO -- E-Commerce

Joe -- I had a conversation this morning with Jonathan McHale at USTR on
the status of E-commerce after Seattle.

McHale said that the E-commerce moratorium put in place by ministers in
May 1998 was schedule to run through the Third WTO Ministerial (i.e.
Seattle).  Since that Ministerial was suspended (and not formally
ended), the US view is that the moratorium is still in effect.

As to the work done in Seattle, McHale observed that the E-commerce
people had reached a fair degree of consensus on an extension of the
E-commerce moratorium, a work plan to look at the applicability of the
WTO's rules to E-commerce, and a commitment about not imposing
unnecessary regulations on E-commerce.  Since the Ministerial was
suspended, that progress is in limbo, and the US and other WTO members
are considering how best to proceed.

I asked him about the comments attributed the EU officials that the EU
would agree to an extension of the E-commerce moratorium only if other
countries agreed to the EU's assertion that all E-commerce falls under
the WTO services agreement (GATS).  He said that the US would never
agree to that, and that other countries shared the U.S. position.

As to next steps, he suggested that it would be important for companies
to go through the current WTO commitments and the UN's Central Product
Classification (CPC) code to make sure that whatever E-commerce
activities they are engaged in are covered.  I mentioned the work we are
doing on energy services, and he said the work in E-commerce in
analogous -- we should go through and see what services already are
covered, and let USTR know if we think that something we are doing is
not covered and needs to be brought into the service definitions.  In
other words, define who we are, what barriers we face (or what areas
need to be kept barrier free), and what our key issues and markets are.

As Enron considers what its interests are in E-commerce, you probably
will want to think both about the activities you are directly engaged
in, and those activities your customers are engaged in.  For example,
the benefits of having the pipeline (i.e. bandwidth) unencumbered by
tariffs or unnecessary regulations would be limited if the products
delivered over the pipeline were subject to significant restrictions.

McHale was very open, and I expect he would be pleased to meet with
Enron if you wanted to get into a more detailed discussion of the issue.

Regards -- Bob


The following justification is intended to support potential deDASR decision
for SDG&E service territory accounts.

For Bundled Contracts (EES & EEMC), EES is responsible for managing all
components of the customers bundled bill except taxes.  Such components
include energy and all UDC related charge components (CTC, post-transition
period CTC, transmission, distribution, nuclear decommissioning costs and
public purpose programs, i.e. the CA fully bundled bill).  Enron has
leveraged its risk management skills to manage the risks associated with the
regulatory risk embedded within its retail contracts.  The discount off
tariff product provides the Enron customer with certainty regarding the
magnitude and duration of savings derived from deregulation in California.
These contracts span the AB1890 transition period and typically brought
expected deregulation savings forward for the customer and levelized the
savings over the contract term.  EES hedges its risk by buying Energy in the
same manner as the Utilities during the transition period and locking in
supply at fixed prices when customers are exposed to full spot market prices.
 During the regulated AB1890 transition period, the utilities pay ESPs a PX
credit equal to the fully bundled tariff price minus the avoided cost of
energy procurement (the PX-credit).  EES hedges the T&D, and CTC regulatory
risk though a variety of hedging activities including interest rate swaps,
development of bundled service index products, electric commodity and other
fuel related hedging activities and intervention in Utility regulatory
proceedings on behalf of our bundled service customer base.  The ability to
source from the UDC is implicit within any contract that transfers the price
risk for all commodity and UDC-related (non-commodity) costs to Enron.  In
February, 2001 Enron chose to resource its supply for its SCE and PG&E
locations from the host Utility.  This resourcing decision was necessary as a
result of :  a) PG&E/SCE non-compliance with the AB1890 tariffs (Rule 22), b)
the demise of the California PX and lack of a liquid hourly market necessary
to follow a retail customer load shape and c)  to protect our retail customer
base against potential discriminatory treatment upon their return to Utility
Service upon expiration of their Enron retail energy service contract.

Current legislation is now pending that may again provide regulated bundled
service rates for SDG&E customers.  This legislation has the potential to
provide for the discriminatory treatment of direct access service customers
upon their return to Utility default service at the expiration of their DA
contract term.  Upon passage of such legislation, it is imperative that
bundled service and direct access customers continue to be treated in a
comparable manner.  This was a fundamental principle of California
deregulation.  The passage of such legislation, would result in the continued
need for SDG&E to calculate a PX credit associated with energy deliveries by
third party ESPs.  Under AB1890, the credit is equal to the fully bundled
contract price minus the spot market value of the energy plus associated
delivery costs imposed on the Schedule Coordinator.  The energy only portion
of the SDG&E customer bill has continued to be calculated and posted on the
SDG&E ESP website even after the suspension of the SDG&E rate freeze in July,
1999.  New legislation with a fixed generation rate applicable to SDG&E
bundled service customers which allowed for collection of resulting UDC
undercollections in future time periods from all customers (including
existing DA customers who later return to UDC bundled service) essentially
constitutes a return to the AB1890 transition period mechanism for SDG&E.
Such legislation may also prevent the establishment of critical mass
necessary to support development of a liquid hourly market within California
necessary to follow a retail customers load shape without the existence of
the PX.  In the event of such a reregulation rate freeze, AB1890 and the
existing SDG&E tariffs should also make SDG&E liable for such "PX-Credits" to
ESPs who have entering into bilateral Bundled Service contracts under the
AB1890.  In the event that the rules, tariffs or legislation are modified to
no longer provide for such PX-credits, EES could preserve the commercial
practicality of its CA Bundled Service Contracts by resourcing its supply for
EES/EEMC customers located within SDG&E service territory directly from SDG&E.


Dear Mr. Skilling,

Good day to you!  I believe our companies may have a fit for a possible working relationship.  My name is Gayle Johnson and I am with Working Solutions (www.workingsol.com).  We are a virtual service management company and specialize in contact center management, including:  voice, e-mail, chat, fax, and VOIP, using home-based agents.  Our virtual community of educated, experienced agents is highly scalable, providing solutions for peak demand, high spike call volumes and short notice applications.

We currently have over 11,000 agents, speaking 35 languages, who have been tested and their experience level/skill sets have been logged.  We have a different model that eliminates the benefit load, infrastructure costs, and bricks/mortar issues of a traditional contact center by using our network of agents.  We also utilize your existing technology infrastructure to keep all reporting and management functions consistent within your organization.

If you'd like to consider outsourcing customer care, tech support agents, etc., I know we have a quality, cost-effective solution for you.

At your request, I can send you a two page overview of our company.

I look forward to exploring this possibility with you.

Sincerely,
Gayle Johnson
Working Solutions
gjohnson@workingsol.com
877-849-9779, ext. 253
815-730-0486

**********************************************************
Working Solutions...enabling the world to work for you!


Kim:  Everything on the list is complete.  You were granted $11,500 tonight.  I have been working with Darla to make sure that John Cogan has been paid each month.  We are caught up on his payments.

Let me know if you have any more questions.

Thanks

Anne

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ward, Kim S (Houston)
Sent:	Thursday, November 01, 2001 10:56 AM
To:	Bike, Anne
Cc:	Tycholiz, Barry; Bronstein, Mara
Subject:	Citizens/PPL Griffith accrual income

Anne,

Please book the following accrual origination from grigsby's book to myself and Chris Foster ( 50% each):

June 2001	$9,566.58
July 2001	$5,706.52
Aug 2001	$7,736.97

Also, are you the one that I need to inform of what to pay John Cogan?  And if so, what months and amounts have we paid him?

I will have september ready today or tomarrow and October ready by the 10th which will be our standard procedure.  Let me know if you have any questions.

thanks,

Kim

ps  attached are the supporting spreadsheets

 << File: June2001PricinggriffithTEST.xls >>

 << File: July2001pricinggriffithprelim2_jc.xls >>

 << File: New August 01.xls >>


Notice No. MS-81
December 19, 2001

COMMODITY EXCHANGE, INC.

SWITCH OF GUARANTEE

Please be advised that effective with the open of business, December 18,
2001, John Santoro (TORO-6244) will no longer be guaranteed by Man
International, Inc.  However, Mr. Santoro will remain a member guaranteed by
Spear, Leeds, & Kellogg.

In connection therewith, notification of any claims against the
aforementioned individual arising out of transactions executed on the
Exchange up to the close of business on December 17, 2001, must be submitted
to the Corporate Secretary's Office within (10) days of this notice.

Inquiries regarding the above should be directed to the Member Services
Department at 212-299-2370.


Bill: I've checked the information for the WSU Student Marketing meeting on 9/26, and it will take place at the WSU campus (so: no driving to Lacey, WA!). I have not yet heard back from the president of the organization, but will let you know the details when I find out what they are. The meeting begins at 7:00pm on the 26th--drive down that morning? I'll follow-up with you later.

-Grace

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rodriguez, Grace
Sent:	Monday, August 06, 2001 11:15 AM
To:	Nelson, Kourtney; Mallory, Chris; Williams III, Bill; Oh, Jeffrey; Van houten, Maria
Cc:	Sheppard, Kathryn; Chatterton, Jill; Burry, Jessica
Subject:	College Career Fairs

Hello!

You have been selected to represent Enron-Portland at an upcoming college career fair this fall or early winter. Below you will find the school and date of the career fair you are asked to attend. Could you check your schedule and let me know your availability? I'd like to know ASAP so that I can make arrangements for travel, etc.

Give me a call (or send me an e-mail) if you have any questions!

Thanks,
Grace
x8321

================================

School				Career Fair	Attendee
Washington State		9/27		Bill Williams (WSU student marketing meeting on 9/26)
U Cal Davis			10/11		Todd Perry
Oregon State			10/23		Maria Van Houten
Univ of Oregon			1/30		Jeffrey Oh
Portland State Univ		2/13		Chris Mallory

University of Portland		TBD		Kourtney Nelson
Univ of Washington		N/A		N/A (same day as UC Davis Fair)


Power Curve 5: Forward Power Continues Softening; Implications

* The Power Curve has softened since our last analysis (Power Curve 4,
May 2).  Forward expectations are down 11%, 15% and 9% for 2001, 2002 and
2003, respectively.  The Spark Spread, an important measure of profit
potential, has declined further: down 18%, 32% and 84%, respectively.
* Shape of curve remains "backwardated" - decreasing from a peak this
summer.
* Softening trend has continued since January.  This period every
region was affected with California and the West showing the largest
declines.
* Power Producers: most favorable commodity pricing environment this
summer--continue to expect positive earnings surprises 2Q and perhaps 3Q.
* Recommendation to investors:  Expect near-term strength in Producers
keyed off of strong 2Q expectations.  Recommend shifting portfolio toward
Energy Merchants as we move into the summer.  Maintain positive ratings on
both groups of stocks given strong near-term earnings visibility.

 <<Power Curve 5 5-24-01.doc>>  <<Power Curve 5 5-24-01.pdf>>

Raymond C. Niles
Power/Natural Gas Research
Salomon Smith Barney
(212) 816-2807
ray.niles@ssmb.com

s

 - Power Curve 5 5-24-01.doc
 - Power Curve 5 5-24-01.pdf


My apologies, Rosalee.  Not sure what happened.  Let's try again.  Let me
know if you're still having problems.

Best,
Jeff


David,  Have you had a chance to review these requirements?  Let me know.
---------------------- Forwarded by Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT on 09/27/99 02:37 PM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Shonnie Daniel                           09/24/99 11:01 AM

To: David Marshall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ken
Choyce/DEN/ECT@Enron
cc:
Subject: Insurance Requirements.

David,

Please review the Insurance Requirements set forth below and confirm that
this is the coverage that would be required by a Construction Contractor for
ENA.

Shonnie Daniel x31463

EXHIBIT E
MINIMUM INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS

Worker Compensation and Employers Liability Insurance

Contractor agrees to comply with Workers Compensation laws of the state where
the Work is performed, and to maintain a Workers Compensation and Employers
Liability policy.  This policy shall be endorsed to provide: all states
coverages, voluntary compensation coverages and occupational disease.  If the
Work is to be performed on or near navigable waters, the policy shall include
coverage for United States Longshoremen's and Harbor Worker's, Death on the
High Seas, Jones Act, and all shall contain endorsement for Borrowed Servants.

Workers Compensation  Statutory

Employer's Liability  $1,000,000 Each Accident (Minimum)
    $1,000,000 Disease Each Employee

General Liability Insurance

General Liability insurance, endorsed to provide coverage for explosion,
collapse and underground damage hazards to property of others; Contractual
Liability (particularly the applicable provisions of the "General Indemnity"
section of this Contract); Contractors Protective Liability (if
subcontracting is authorized) and Products and Completed Operations (for a
minimum of two year after acceptance of the Work).  Watercraft exclusions
deleted (if Work necessitates the use of watercraft of any kind).

Bodily Injury   $1,000,000 Each Occurrence (Minimum)
Property Damage   $1,000,000 Each Occurrence (Minimum)

or

Bodily Injury and
Property Damage   $1,000,000 Combined Single Limit Each Occurrence (Minimum)

Automobile Liability Insurance

Automobile Liability insurance which shall include coverage for all owned,
non-owned and hired vehicles.

Bodily Injury   $1,000,000 Each Person (Minimum)
    $1,000,000 Each Occurrence (Minimum)
Property Damage   $1,000,000 Each Occurrence (Minimum)

or

Bodily Injury and
Property Damage   $1,000,000 Combined Single Limit Each Occurrence (Minimum)

Excess Umbrella Liability Coverage

Bodily Injury and
Property Damage   $1,000,000 Combined Single Limit Each Occurrence (Minimum)

Additional Requirements

Contractor shall require any subcontractor at any tier, vendor, supplier,
material dealer and others connected with the Work to provide and maintain
insurance at all times during the period that their agreement related to Work
under this Contract is in force and effect at the subcontractor's, vendor's,
supplier's, material dealer's, or others' own cost, with insurance limits and
in form and issuing companies acceptable to Company.

Contractor shall submit to Company at the time Contractor executes this
Contract, a Certificate of Insurance, in form satisfactory to Company,
evidencing that satisfactory coverages of the type and limits set forth
hereinabove are in effect.  Policies providing such coverages shall contain
provisions that no cancellation or material changes in the policies shall
become effective except on thirty (30) days advance written notice thereof to
Company.  Irrespective of the requirements as to insurance to be carried as
provided for herein, the insolvency, bankruptcy or failure of any insurance
company carrying insurance of Contractor, the failure of any insurance
company to pay claims accruing, or the inadequacy of the limits of the
insurance, shall not affect, negate or waive any to the provisions of this
Contract including, without exception, the indemnity obligations of
Contractor.

Contractor agrees to require any policies of insurance, except Workers
Compensation coverages, which are in any way related to the Work and that are
secured and maintained by Contractor or its subcontractors, to include
Company, its parent and affiliated companies, and their directors, officers,
employees and agents, as Additional Insured.  Furthermore, Underwriters shall
waive all rights of recovery against Company, its parent and affiliated
companies which Contractor may have or acquire because of deductible clauses
in or inadequacy of limits of, any policies of insurance maintained by
Contractor.

Contractor agrees to require all such policies of insurance which are in any
way related to the Work and that are secured and maintained by Contractor or
its subcontractors, to include clauses providing that each underwriter shall
waive its rights of recovery, under subrogation or otherwise, against
Company, its parent and affiliated companies and their directors, officers,
employees and agents.


Leslie,

Why am I getting this information below?  These counterparties are not on my
approval lists for the last few days.  Did Frank ask you questions re: the
counterparties below, and you just want me to put this info in the EOL Legal
Database?

Leslie Hansen
03/02/2000 11:57 AM
To: Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Rhonda L Denton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Molly Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: EOL Counterparties

Frank:

1.  Midland Cogeneration Venture Limited Partnership is not authorized to
trade any U.S. power products.  (We are currently in litigation with Midland
and are not trading with this CP.)

2.  Otter Tail Power Company -- Enron Sales only pursuant to on-line GTCs.
We do not have any trading agreements with this CP so it is not necessary to
send an override letter.

3.  Florida Power Corporation and Carolina Power & Light Company -- Enron
Sales only pursuant to on-line GTCs.  Each of these CPs should receive an
override letter in the form attached below.

Call me with any questions at *36121.

Leslie