When: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 9:30 AM-10:30 AM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada).
Where: Hennessy, Sonia; Romero, Araceli

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*


Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 08:40:43 -0500
From: "Tracey Bradley" <tbradley@bracepatt.com>
To: "Justin Long" <jlong@bracepatt.com>, "Paul Fox" <pfox@bracepatt.com>
Cc: "Deanna King" <dking@bracepatt.com>, "Ronald Carroll"
<rcarroll@bracepatt.com>
Subject: Scheduled blackout plan gaining favor
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline

FYI

Scheduled blackout plan gaining favor
LIMITING PRICES: 3-state buyers' cartel with Northwest could create leverage

Lynda Gledhill, Chronicle Sacramento Bureau
Thursday, May 17, 2001
,2001 San Francisco Chronicle

URL:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2001/05/17/MN88959.DTL

More blackouts but no ransom payments for energy gougers -- that's a deal
looking increasingly attractive to California lawmakers and consumer
advocates.

The idea, which has attracted the support of some key lawmakers and the
cautious interest of Gov. Gray Davis, is for the state to set a firm ceiling
on what it will pay power producers for electricity this summer -- and not
one dime more.

The trade-off would be certain blackouts, possibly more than if the state
continues to pay any price electricity sellers demand.

Some advocates of the idea think that California could minimize the number of
blackout hours and gain a measure of control over the energy crisis by
scheduling service interruptions.

"We need to stop this game of electricity chicken," said Michael Shames,
director of the Utility Consumers' Action Network, which first proposed the
idea. "We are likely to see blackouts this summer; we should use them to our
advantage rather than be victimized by them."

The plan calls for creating a "buyers' cartel" of California, Oregon and
Washington. Essentially, the states would decide at what price they were
willing to buy power and refuse to purchase once it tops that level.

The state has spent $6 billion on energy purchases since January, and at one
point during last week's power shortage was spending $1,900 per megawatt hour
-- more than 10 times what Davis has planned on for this summer. That kind of
spending cannot go on, Democratic Assemblyman Fred Keeley of Boulder Creek
said yesterday.

"The question is, can we sustain the level of spending we have and have the
state maintain economic stability? I believe the answer is no," said Keeley,
the lower house's main figure on energy policy and author of the bill that
put the state in the power-buying business.

"To get this problem solved, we have to think in bold terms," said Keeley,
who introduced a resolution along with fellow Democratic Assemblyman Paul
Koretz of West Hollywood that urged Davis to form a cartel.

THREE STATES ARE BETTER THAN ONE
Davis said last week that "my bias would be to keep the lights on at any
price." But yesterday, the governor said a temporary price limit is
"certainly a matter we've talked about and considered at some length. The
next step will be to see how the governors of Oregon and Washington respond
to it."

A spokesman for Gov. Gary Locke of Washington said the matter is being
considered. Calls to the office of Oregon Gov. John Kitzhaber were not
returned.

The idea has appeal among some consumers who believe, as many state officials
do, that California is being gouged for electricity.

"I can see if our bills were $20 or $30 more, but this is ridiculous," said
Kimberly Chambers, an 18-year-old fashion design student from Oakland.
"Whatever it takes, I don't think we should have to pay for more."

But Yunah Kim, 36, who moved to the Bay Area from New York a month ago, said
blackouts should not even be considered.

"The infrastructure of government is coming apart, and it's the basic service
government is able to provide," she said. "Businesses are not going to put up
with that. It's very shortsighted. We just have to pay until there's a
solution."

Severin Borenstein, director of the University of California Energy Institute
in Berkeley, said blackouts might be worse than supporters of price limits
believe.

"I think they (power companies) would call our bluff," and sell their
electricity elsewhere, Borenstein said. "I don't think the state has the
ability to credibly commit to paying no more than 'X.' That would be a very
controversial decision."

Legislation is already in the works to give Davis the ability to enter into a
West Coast buyers cartel. A bill sponsored by state Sen. Dede Alpert, D-
Coronado, would allow the Independent System Operator to refuse to buy power
if it is too expensive.

The maximum the state would pay would be set by a formula, based on such
things as the cost of natural gas. A reasonable profit for power producers
would be built in, supporters said.

LOOKING FOR SOME CONTROL
Alpert said everyone wants to avoid blackouts, but that seems unlikely.

"Everybody I talked to -- once you establish that there will be blackouts --

both businesses and residents say, let's have control," Alpert said.

The California Manufacturers and Technology Association, which commissioned a
recent report that said unplanned blackouts could cost the state economy $21.
8 billion and 135,000 jobs, is considering whether scheduled interruptions
would be less harmful.

"The problem if we do (scheduled blackouts) is that we may have an inordinate
amount of blackouts," said Gino DeCaro, a spokesman for the group.

NO EASY TASK
The ISO, which runs the state's power grid, is scheduled to issue a report
tomorrow on how scheduled blackouts might work.

Sen. Debra Bowen, D-Marina del Ray, said that planning blackouts is not as
easy as it sounds.

"The difficulty is a pragmatic one -- the circuits are not wired to deal with
choices like we are having to make," said Bowen, who has been holding
hearings on how the state might better manage blackouts.

"Maybe we should be paying people to turn off their fuse box," Bowen said.

Chronicle staff writer Marsha Ginsburg contributed to this report. / E-mail
Lynda Gledhill at lgledhill@sfchronicle.com.

,2001 San Francisco Chronicle   Page A - 1


---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 02/10/2000 03:42 PM
---------------------------

	From:  Yvette G Connevey @ ENRON                           02/10/2000 09:59 AM

To: Michael Walters/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT, O'Neal D
Winfree/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryan Hull/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chad Landry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Timothy
Blanchard/HOU/EES@EES, Shanna Husser/Corp/Enron@Enron, Brenda F
Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Steve Venturatos/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Happy Hour to Welcome Jody Crook

You are invited to Happy Hour this evening to help Steve Venturatos welcome
Jody Crook, a new Analyst, to the Regulatory Compliance group.  We will be
meeting at the State Bar, 909 Texas, around 5:30.   Feel free to extend the
invitation!!

See ya there!

Yvette
x3.5953


This deal is starting to get confusing.... so here is the whole deal
effective 3/21 to 3/31.

  gulf / leach/coh 22-3

38011/46 8979/8711/8527
51875/25 3657/3548/3473
60599/7  3159/3065/3000
63895/6  3686/3576/3500
63895/8  0/1917/1876  This piece from TCO pool.

No contracts are currently overrun.

Cindy/Kathy/Jesse - we are pulling 19481 from your p20 pool on contract
63895, which max's out the contract. Any additional Aristech coh 22-3 sale
will  have to be from TCO pool.

Kara - we are delivering to coh 22-3 as follows:
38011 = 8527
51875 = 3473
60599 = 3000
63895 = 5376

John - I have 550,154 being pulled from p20 for the month. I hope that ties
to your number. I cannot pull any additional gas from p20, because this would
overrun your FTS1 contract. The 1 dkt SIT can be made up from Enron's TCO
pool. Please verify that this is okay. I'll schedule it for 3/23 gas day.

Thank you everyone for your patience!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Chris Germany@ECT
03/21/2000 09:40 AM
To: Joan Veselack/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jesse
Villarreal/HOU/ECT@ECT, bperron@columbiaenergy.com
cc: Robert Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joann Collins/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: CES/Aristech deal

I sold CES 2727dt of CGLF mainline gas (deal 221731) effective 21st-31st.
Aristech only had enough mainline capacity to pull away 751 dt.  I changed
the volume on this deal and created another sale to CES at the CGAS pool
(deal 222359) for a volume of 1917 dt.

 2727 - 751 = 1976 at mainline.
1976 at mainline less fuel of 2.988% = 1917 at the CGAS pool.

Price = $2.77
 .1045  variable cost mainline to Leach
 .0250  demand charge
 ---------
 2.8995 CGAS price.

Please let me know if you have any questions.


The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  ? 2001 Carr Futures

The charts are now available on the web by clicking on the hot link(s)
contained in this email. If for any reason you are unable to receive the
charts via the web, please contact me via email and I will email the charts
to you as attachments.

Crude     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/crude30.pdf
Natural Gas     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/ngas30.pdf
Distillate     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hoil30.pdf
Unleaded     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/unlded30.pdf

Nov WTI/Brent Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/clx-qox.pdf
Dec Heat Crack     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/heatcrack.pdf
Dec Gas Crack     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/gascrack.pdf
Dec/May Heat Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hoz-hok.pdf
Jan/Feb Heat Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hof-hog.pdf
Nov Gas/Heat Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hux-hox.pdf
Dec Gas/Heat Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/huz-hoz.pdf
Nov/Mar Unlead Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hux-huh.pdf

Nat Gas Strip Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/StripmatrixNG30.pdf
Nat Gas Spread Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SpreadmatrixNG30.pdf

Crude and Products Spread Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SpreadmatrixCL30.pdf

Scott Oblander
312-762-1015
312-762-1014 fax
Carr Futures
150 S. Wacker
Suite 1500
Chicago, IL 60606


Cc list suppressed...

Re-Reg incoming....

From D.S. George, ALSTOM ESCA

August 10, 2000

California's Governor Orders Regulators
To Slash Electric Rates in Southern Areas

By ANDY PASZTOR and JASON LEOPOLD
Staff Reporters of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL

Gov. Gray Davis ordered California utility regulators to
immediately slash electricity rates in southern parts of the
state by about 50%. The move threatens to ratchet up the
political debate over high power prices and could end up
pitting California against federal regulators.

If the appointed Public Utilities Commission approves such a
rollback, typical residential electric bills for some 1.1
million customers would shrink to about $55 a month from the
current $122 level, according to Sempra Energy's San Diego
Gas & Electric Co. unit. Rates have nearly doubled in the
past three months. The governor's plan also would
essentially freeze rates for the next two years.

Consumers and Regulators Seek to Cope With Lingering
California Power Crisis (Aug. 4)[PARA]Deregulation Leaves
Electricity Market Ripe for Manipulation by Power Firms
(Aug. 4)[PARA]California Agencies Are Beset by Major
Electricity Shortages (Aug. 3)[PARA]California Cuts Price
Cap for Electricity Once Again (Aug. 2)

Stretching from the Mexican border to the southern part of
Orange County, the region affected by the order has been
hard hit by steep price spikes stemming from local power
shortages, regulatory confusion and unusually hot weather.
As a result of deregulation, area consumers in July 1999
became the first California residents to pay market prices
for power.

While the utilities commission isn't slated to hold an
emergency meeting until Aug. 21, commissioner Richard Bilas
said that Wednesday's announcement already was branded as
"extreme" by some state lawmakers who accused Gov. Davis of
trying to "pre-empt the legislature" by capitalizing on the
politically charged issue. The legislature previously had
scheduled to take up the issue of proposed rate rollbacks as
early as Thursday.

The state commission last week rejected call for mandatory
rate reductions. But Wednesday, commission president Loretta
Lynch said the governor is "calling for the right thing" to
provide "price relief and some predictability" to San Diego
customers. The governor also announced an agreement with
grocery store operators that could result in as much as a
10% voluntary reduction in energy use by such stores when
power supplies are especially tight.

Democratic State Sen. Steve Peace says that consumption in
fast-growing parts of the state, like the San Diego area,
have surged to levels that weren't anticipated until 2015.
Mr. Peace, the architect of deregulation here, is urging
state agencies not to approve any sales of interests in
power plants owned by California-based utilities until
conditions normalize.

Meanwhile, the Navy isn't waiting for state initiatives.
With its San Diego power bills projected to climb to $39
million from the $20 million budgeted from June to
September, Navy planners have been quietly studying the
possibility of bringing in two of their own generators to
supply electricity to San Diego bases. In addition, admirals
have demanded sharp reductions in power usage, including
orders to turn off all lights in many offices during peak
times. "We are working by the lights of our computers," said
a Navy spokesman. As Sedge's largest San Diego customer, the
Navy uses about 130 megawatts per day during high demand
periods.

Steve Baum, president and chief executive of Sempra, said
the "electric market is broken" and all factions must work
together to prevent out-of-state generators from "gouging"
California residents by selling power "at unconscionably
high prices." But he said state utility regulators are
better equipped to find ways to cushion the blow from
wholesale price hikes than are "instant-pudding bills"
proposed by lawmakers.

Write to Andy Pasztor at andy.pasztor@wsj.com and Jason
Leopold at jason.leopold@wsj.com


Joe & FGA Team:

Just wanted to make you aware that there will be a great deal of activity
next week on pipeline safety legislation, with a markup of Senator McCain's
legislation (S. 2438) expected in the Senate Commerce Committee on Thursday,
June 15.

GPG Pipeline Safety VP Dave Johnson will be in DC on Monday the 12th through
Wednesday the 14th, and we are setting up meetings with a number of Senate
Commerce Committee members & staff.   Right now we have meetings planned with
staff for Sens. McCain, Hollings, Gorton, Lott, Hutchison, Frist, Ashcroft,
Burns, Snowe, Breaux and Murray.

INGAA stumbled into good timing by scheduling its "Pipeline Summit 2000" for
Wednesday the 14th at the Hyatt on Capitol Hill, so a number of senior
pipeline execs will be in town and can be called into action to lobby.   Phil
Lowry, Managing Director of Operations for GPG will be speaking on a panel on
Wednesday afternoon.

Also, since there will be a few CEOs in town, we are joining forces with El
Paso and Duke to get some member meetings -- right now we have Sens.
Hutchison and Breaux confirmed for the 13th.   Stan Horton was going to be
traveling elsewhere, but is strongly considering re-arranging his schedule to
come to DC on the 13th and 14th.   As incoming chairman of INGAA next year,
he is very engaged on pipeline safety legislation, and wants to play an
active role at this critical juncture.  I will advise you if Stan confirms
his trip to DC.

If you would like additional information on this issue or our efforts, I will
be at the Government Affairs Meeting in Ontario and will be happy to fill you
in in more detail.


Glad I gave you such a GLOWING review.

From: Kathleen Carnahan/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/24/2001 04:17 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Chris Booth/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:

Subject: RE: FW: Escrow Agreement

I am printing the Fee Agreement right now.  It is my understanding Marisa
Reuter is reviewing the Escrow Agreement, so I plan on calling her tomorrow
for her comments.  Then, the plan is to find out how many need to be executed
and get the ink.

Also, I am revising the Incumbency Certificate right now to be signed by
Duran, Presto and Tricoli.  Kay, I will bring for your initials in a few
minutes.

K-

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Mann, Kay
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 4:15 PM
To: Booth, Chris
Cc: Carnahan, Kathleen
Subject: Re: FW: Escrow Agreement

I've volunteered Kathleen to help process the paper.

ckm

From: Chris Booth/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/24/2001 02:12 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Ben Jacoby/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:

Subject: FW: Escrow Agreement

FYI

 -----Original Message-----
From:  "Young, Michael" <Michael.Young@northwestern.com>@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Young+2C+20Michael+22+20+3CMichael+2EYoung+40northwester
n+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 1:56 PM
To: Booth, Chris
Cc: 'margueritekahn@paulhastings.com'
Subject: Escrow Agreement

Chris, per our conversation this afternoon, this e-mail will document the
fact that, due to travel schedules, NorthWestern is unable to obtain the
necessary officer signatures for the incumbency documents requested by
Citibank as part of establishing the escrow arrangement called for under the
Letter Agreement.  You agreed that NorthWestern could complete the necessary
paperwork with Citibank on Tuesday of next week.  Thanks again for your
flexibility.

Michael J. Young
Senior Corporate Counsel
NorthWestern Corporation
125 S. Dakota Avenue
Sioux Falls, SD  57104
Fax:  605/978-2840
Phone:  605/978-2836
Cell:  605/351-4040


As a reminder...there are several pieces of equipment that are set up on the 30th Floor, as well as on our floor, for the Disaster Recovery Team.  PLEASE DO NOT TAKE, BORROW OR USE this equipment.  Should you need to use another computer system, other than yours, or make conference calls please work with your Assistant to help find or set up equipment for you to use.

Thanks for your understanding in this matter.

T.Jae Black
East Power Trading
Assistant to Kevin Presto
off. 713-853-5800
fax 713-646-8272
cell 713-539-4760


_________________________________________________________________

            B R E A K F A S T   W I T H   T H E   F O O L
                     Monday, October 9, 2000

benjamin.rogers@enron.com
_________________________________________________________________

REGISTER TO BECOME A FOOL -- GET FREE STUFF!
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=147833
_________________________________________________________________

 Sponsored By: InvestorPlace.com
 There are 5 tech stocks every investor must own. Tech expert
 Michael Murphy reveals their names--and the best strategy
 for buying them today--in his JUST-RELEASED FREE REPORT:
 http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=147834

"Business, you know, may bring money, but friendship hardly ever
does." -- Jane Austen

SMITHKLINE TO BUY BLOCK DRUG
The big British drug maker bolsters its consumer business.

By Tom Jacobs

British-based drug producer SmithKline Beecham (NYSE: SBH)
announced today that it would swallow New Jersey's oral products
maker Block Drug (Nasdaq: BLOCA) for $1.24 billion. SmithKline
will pay $53 a share for Block, which closed Friday at $50.63,
up 0.75%. SmithKline ended the week at $67.44, a mere 5% under
its 52-week high.

SmithKline is expanding its consumer business while competitors
such as Bristol-Myers Squibb (NYSE: BMY) are shedding theirs to
focus on drugs. SmithKline already earns one-third of its
revenues from consumer products, which include Aquafresh
toothpaste, and now adds Block's Sensodyne toothpaste and
Polident denture cleaner brands. Commentators speculate that
SmithKline is keeping a consumer division to better deliver
non-prescription versions of its own drugs that have lost patent
protection, or that the Block buyout better positions SmithKline
to spin off its consumer division.

At the same time, the British drug powerhouse is pushing into
genomics: It has joined a new public-private consortium to fund
efforts to decode mouse DNA within the next six months. The $53
million Mouse Sequencing Consortium includes SmithKline,
Affymetrix (Nasdaq: AFFX), the Merck Genome Research Institute,
the U.S. National Institutes of Health, and the British-based
Wellcome Trust. Like its sibling the SNP Consortium, the Mouse
confab hopes to speed genomic data into the public domain.
Celera Genomics (NYSE: CRA) and other companies are competing to
sequence the mouse genome and SNPs (single nucleotide
polymorphisms) to sell in proprietary databases.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=147835

Surrounding these events is the pending merger of SmithKline
with larger drug maker Glaxo Wellcome (NYSE: GLX). The two await
regulatory approval to create the world's second-largest
pharmaceutical firm with a $180 billion market cap. Perhaps
because of their experience -- the Federal Trade Commission has
delayed the merger twice and now won't rule until the end of the
year -- SmithKline hasn't announced a target date to close the
Block deal.
_________________________________________________________________

NEWS TO GO

Reuters reports that General Motors (NYSE: GM) and Fiat are
joining forces for talks to purchase some or all of ailing South
Korean car maker Daewoo. Daewoo Motor is one of 12 units of
Daewoo Group, which creditors rescued in August and seek to
shore up. Ford beat out GM in June for exclusive talks with
Daewoo, but Ford ended negotiations in September. GM and Daewoo
Motors have been around the block before -- several times. Their
15-year alliance ended in 1992.

City delivery speedsters Kozmo.com and Urbanfetch.com are
talking a Kozmo buyout again, according to The New York Times.
Kozmo has not been the most ardent suitor: It sued Urbanfetch
before it opened last year and settled out of court. The parties
have bailed from previous talks at the last minute. The Times'
sources state that the new company would hope to go public in
the next year -- if the Internet IPO market turns up.

Facing tomorrow's announcement of latest quarter earnings,
biotech drug maker Biogen (Nasdaq: BGEN) licensed five new drug
targets from genomics drug discovery company CuraGen (Nasdaq:
CRGN). Biogen has been criticized for the weakness of its drug
development pipeline, and the CuraGen deal gives Biogen a jump
start at the early stages of the pipeline -- five targets
against which to test possible drug candidates. Biogen also
announced a management realignment Friday.

A new gene bank, the First Genetic Trust, will open to allay
people's reluctance to share their genetic data with
researchers. Arthur Holden, chair of the SNP Consortium and
Mouse Consortium (see lead story above), will form the bank with
David Wang, former head of genomics and bioinformatics at
Motorola (NYSE: MOT), and Andrea Califano, former computational
biology director at IBM (NYSE: IBM). The bank would perform two
main functions designed to keep individual information private,
assuage fears that information could be used to deny employment
or insurance, and increase efficiency. The bank would provide
analysis results to researchers, but not the individual genetic
data, and patients could authorize the bank to give their
doctors access to a patient's DNA account for prescription
purposes instead of having to test patients each time.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=147836

Enjoy Friday's Foolish market wrap-up with one swift click!
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=147837
_________________________________________________________________

EDITOR'S PICK

Your favorite stock takes a nosedive and you want to sell it,
take a tax loss, and buy it back at the lower price. Enter Roy
Lewis to warn you of wash sale rules.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=147838
_______________________________________________________________

-News & Commentary
 http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=147839

-Fool Community
 http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=147840

-Post of the Day
 http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=147841

-Latest Fribble
 http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=147842

-Latest Market Numbers
 http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=147843
____________________________________________________________

My Portfolio: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=147844
My Discussion Boards: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=147845
My Fool: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=147846
Fool.com Home: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=147847
My E-Mail Settings: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=147848

 Sponsored By: InvestorPlace.com
 There are 5 tech stocks every investor must own. Tech expert
 Michael Murphy reveals their names--and the best strategy
 for buying them today--in his JUST-RELEASED FREE REPORT:
 http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=147849

ARE YOU INTERESTED IN BIOTECH STOCKS?
 Enroll in our biotech investing online seminar and
 learn from experts. 100% money-back guarantee.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=147850

BECOME A FOOL!
 Get a FREE Investing Guide and more...
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=147851

FOOL DIRECT E-MAIL SERVICES
 Need to change your address or unsubscribe? You
 can also temporarily suspend mail delivery. Click here:
http://www.fool.com/community/freemail/freemaillogin.asp?email=benjamin.rogers
@enron.com>

Have ideas about how we can improve the Fool Direct or new
e-mail products you'd like to see? Try our discussion board:
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=147852
____________________________________________________
(c) Copyright 2000, The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. This
material is for personal use only. Republication and
redissemination, including posting to news groups, is expressly
prohibited without the prior written consent of The Motley Fool.

.

MsgId: msg-8562-B10969313Address.msg-08:53:16(10-09-2000)
X-Version: mailer-sender-master,v 1.84
X-Version: mailer-sender-daemon,v 1.84
Message-Recipient: benjamin.rogers@enron.com


Ina,

My badge would not scan in the sky ring and also takes many swipes get in to the main floor and also to open the doors on 32.
Can you find out if I can get a new on with out going down there myself ?

thnx

dq


Greetings.  Is there a chance of setting up a call-in number for these
meetings?  Hope all is well in the land of craziness.

Best,
Jeff


One question, on the $1,000,000 margin per additional power plant that we are assuming for growth, is there any capex associated with that growth?  What about any increase in O&M expense?

Thanks,
Jayshree

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Corman, Shelley
Sent:	Friday, February 15, 2002 3:27 PM
To:	Desai, Jayshree
Subject:	Final Comments

Jayshree,

I j found three more minor nits.

 << File: Northern  IMv2.doc >>


I thought the call on whether a contract is rejected was an economic call and not a product call.  If this is not the case then could we be forced to swallow the other discount off tariff contracts we  intend to reject?

Further, we need to know what the revenue is against this purchase to make a call on the economics.

Richard - Do you have the Patagonia Contract? And/or any of the other green power transactions that EES has entered into with customer's?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Smith, Mike D.
Sent:	Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:50 PM
To:	Blachman, Jeremy; Frazier, Lamar; Schwarz, Angela; Dasovich, Jeff; Steffes, James D.
Cc:	Merril, Deborah D.; Ring, Richard; ','
Subject:	RE: Green Power Partners

Sounds like the economic justification for rejection is clear.  However, we need to be sure that we are not going to keep any customers where we have a contractual requirement to serve green power (Fetzer; Patagonia).  If we are comfortable that we are not, I think we can reject.

MDS

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Blachman, Jeremy
Sent:	Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:47 PM
To:	Smith, Mike D.; Frazier, Lamar; Schwarz, Angela; Dasovich, Jeff; Steffes, James D.
Cc:	Merril, Deborah D.
Subject:	FW: Green Power Partners

take a look at this. Unless there is a customer or regulatory reason to keep this, PPA, it would seem to me that we would want to reject this contract.

Thoughts/comments so we can proceed.

Jeremy

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	O'Neil, Murray P.
Sent:	Thursday, January 17, 2002 11:16 AM
To:	Blachman, Jeremy
Subject:	FW: Green Power Partners

FYI...  Hope this helps in your decision making. - MO

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Perry, Todd
Sent:	Wednesday, January 16, 2002 5:10 PM
To:	O'Neil, Murray P.
Subject:	RE: Green Power Partners

Murry,

Our forward curves show SP-15 power at $26.57/MWh for the period 02/01/2002-12/31/2002 (note that this does not include the discount for unit-contingency that usually accompanies wind power).  Green tags trade in the market for about $1.50/MWh.  Under the "Green Tickets Sales Agreement" it appears that EES has agreed to pay $39/MWh minus the market price of power, which is approximately $12/MWh for Green Tickets using our forward curves.

Let me know if you need any additional information.

Todd

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	O'Neil, Murray P.
Sent:	Wednesday, January 16, 2002 2:15 PM
To:	Blachman, Jeremy; Smith, Mike D.; Perry, Todd; Richter, Jeff
Subject:	FW: Green Power Partners

Attached you will find two agreements EES has with ENRON Wind.

1- Green Ticket Purchase Sale Agreement (PPA)
2- Scheduling Coordinator Service Agreement

With EES & ENA bankruptcy and the fact that Enron Wind has not been paid for the generation back to the month of November through current, Enron Wind is attempting to move their needs to APX for SC Services.  I also think they were looking for someone else to purchase their energy.

I put a temporary stop on their actions but we are going to need to review these contracts to determine if we want to continue operating under them.

Please let me know your thoughts as soon as possible.

Thanks - MO

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Weatherspoon, Patricia
Sent:	Tuesday, January 15, 2002 1:47 PM
To:	O'Neil, Murray P.
Subject:	FW: Green Power Partners

aka Enron Wind.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Choate, Chris
Sent:	Tuesday, January 15, 2002 1:39 PM
To:	Weatherspoon, Patricia
Subject:	Green Power Partners

 << File: Green Tkt Sales Agrmnt_Green_Pwr_Prtnrs.pdf >>  << File: Green Tkt Sched Agrmnt_Green_Pwr_Prtnrs.pdf >>

Chris Choate
Enron Networks
(713) 853-7370


Hi Sara, see the message below about the Merchant Energy deal.  I believe
this deal has not been completed yet.

Thanks,
Melissa
---------------------- Forwarded by Melissa Ann Murphy/HOU/ECT on 05/14/2001
11:54 AM ---------------------------
From: Chris H Foster/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/08/2001 10:22 AM
To: Melissa Ann Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ENRON
Subject: RE: Merchant Energy Deal

Mega just called and said they are going to hold off on this deal until later
in the week. I spoke to Brent Hendry who gave me some good information re:
the confirm and said we could just work directly with the Confirms Group to
get the Confirm out if and when the deal is done.   Sorry for the fire
drill.

Thanks

C

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Murphy, Melissa Ann
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 8:00 AM
To: St Clair, Carol
Cc: Bailey, Susan; Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ENRON
Subject: Merchant Energy Deal

Hello Carol, I know Sara is on vacation.  Below is a draft confirmation
letter that Sara and I prepared for a deal that Chris Foster in the Portland
office may do today.  If he does do this deal will you be the attorney to
look at the confirm?

Thanks,
Melissa
3-1886
---------------------- Forwarded by Melissa Ann Murphy/HOU/ECT on 05/08/2001
08:51 AM ---------------------------
From: Chris H Foster/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/08/2001 08:26 AM
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Melissa Ann Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject:

Sara:

I received a call from Mega today.  That financial gas/power deal could come
together today.  Attached is the draft confirm you prepared.  Let me know
ASAP if you have any "issues" with closing this deal pursuant to the language
you prepared.  I will contact you immediately if it closes.

Thanks!

Chris

 << File: swapcontract.doc >>


RT-

The new El Paso URL is:
http://172.17.172.62/rt/

Click on current.asp to have the page automatically refresh.
The file !current.txt contains the data.

All historical data is in the folders listed on this site.  All past historical data that is not available on the current site ison the P drive under P:\trading\california\realtime.

Going forward, all El Paso data WILL be collected.  Please be aware that the El Paso scrape may change in the future because of the transition of servers from Estate over to Netco.

John Oh
Enron North America		503.464.5066
121 SW Salmon Street		503.860.7983 (cell)
3WTC 0306			503.464.3740 (fax)
Portland, OR 97204			John.Oh@Enron.com


Hi Chris,

Please send me Sep's price.

Thanks,


Ed:  In case you are wondering about Cargill-Alliant.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 04/12/2001 03:01 PM -----

	Mara_Alexander@cargill.com
	04/12/2001 12:15 PM

		 To: Sara.Shackleton@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: guaranties

Dear Sara,

Thanks for your agreement to the Set-Off language.  Do you have some
insights I can pass on to our attorney, who was wondering about the
reason behind the language in Part 5(B), the second Set-Off paragraph?

I had forwarded your comments to our Credit Manager, Andrzej
Kabarowski,
who works with our Corporate Treasury on the Cargill guarantees, but
have yet to receive a response.  I have, however, learned that our
Corporate Treasury has begun implementing a revised guarantee format
(and I am told they are absolutely inflexible about the new language).
We're trying to ascertain whether guarantees are also changing for
Cargill-Alliant, which is a joint venture rather than a subsidiary.
I will advise as soon as I know something definitive in this regard.

Unfortunately, it looks as though this Agreement will need to remain
in the "pending" stack for a little while longer.

Regards,
Mara Alexander
Cargill, Incorporated
Tel: 952.984.3417
Fax: 952.984.3872
e-mail: Mara_Alexander@Cargill.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Sara.Shackleton@enron.com [mailto:Sara.Shackleton@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2001 5:20 PM
To: alexander, mara /xtwn
Cc: Edward.Sacks@enron.com
Subject: guaranties

Mara:

Attached are blacklined versions based upon Cargill's comments to both
the
Enron Corp. and Cargill, Incorporated which I received from Ed Sacks.
Please note that I added a comma to guarantor's name in the Cargill,
Incorporated guaranty since that is how we executed the Cargill,
Incorporated ISDA Master Agreement.

Also, your change to the setoff language is fine.

Let's try to agree to everything this week.  Thanks.

(See attached file: ENEguarantyCargillR1.doc)(See attached file:
CargillguarantorR1.doc)

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


Brent-

The deal has changed (see bottom) and according to Rolo it is still in the
development stage.

Regards,

Pat

---------------------- Forwarded by Patricia Cini/HOU/ECT on 07/28/99 07:31
AM ---------------------------
From: Rodolfo Freyre AT ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@CCMAIL on 07/23/99 08:34 AM
To: Patricia Cini/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Federico Cerisoli AT ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@CCMAIL
Subject: Re: Eden - Siderca

Pat,

That's a good question. Actually we are still defining prices with Eden to
see what we are going to offer Siderca.

Following steps:
Eden and Enron to agree on structure and pricing;
Eden will present the structure to Siderca;
Siderca has to agree to the proposed structure and prices and will start
negotiating documents.

I suggest that we hold on until we agree with Eden on point 1, and once that
is decided, we can start working on it.

Regards,

Rolo

From: "Patricia Cini/HOU/ECT" AT ECT@ccMail on 07/22/99 02:44 PM CDT

To:   Rodolfo Freyre/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject:  Re: Eden - Siderca

Rolo-

Where are you with this deal?  We will need to have underwriting become
involved if you are looking at paying 12MM up front.

Please let me know when you are ready to have a conference call with
underwriting and myself to discuss this deal in detail.

Regards,

Pat

From: Rodolfo Freyre AT ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@CCMAIL on 07/07/99 04:02 PM

To:   Patricia Cini@ECT
cc:   Federico Cerisoli AT ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@CCMAIL, "Don
Black/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT" AT ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@CCMAIL
Subject:  Eden - Siderca

Importance:  High
---------------------------------

Pat,

Fede and I met this morning with Eden. For the time being, we are going to
work with them on another deal (which I will explain below) and we will
suspend the Swap deal that we were currently working on..

Eden - Siderca - Enron Deal

Eden has a full-requirement PPA (140MW) with a TOP of around 50 MWs with
Siderca that ends on May 31st, 2006. The contract price is approximately $30
/Mwh (adjusted with a formula) clearly out of the money.   The contract also
states that Siderca will have to pay $12MM penalty to Eden in the event
Siderca wants to early terminate the contract. We have proposed to Eden the
following structure:

Enron will pay Eden an upfront payment of $12MM so that Eden terminates the
contract with Siderca, and then Enron can transact with Siderca. Enron will
sign a MSA with Siderca selling (financially) for around 70 MW flat during
the term of the agreement.
Enron will sign a MSA with a Generator (possibly CTSN - an AES Co. - or
Central Puerto) to buy (financially) 70 MW flat during the term of the
agreement.
Siderca will sign a physical power contract with a generator for 70 MW @ spot
prices.
Term of the agreement: Nov '99 - March '06.

One important point is to determine what will the concept for the Upfront
Payment that Enron will make to Eden. Fede and I
thought about two options:
Dummy Option or,
Direct Payment to the Main Shareholders of Eden on an off-shore basis

I am attaching a slide were the transaction is described. If you have any
questions about the deal structure, do not hesitate to call either Fede or
myself.

Rolo

(See attached file: Siderca-Eden.ppt)
 - Siderca-Eden.ppt


I have set up the following BPA account numbers since we have been submitting
dec bids at Malin the past few days:

CISO to PUGET  882716
CISO to WWP       681713
CISO to SCL         882790
CISO to Tacoma 882791

I realize these counterparties can pick up at malin however, I thought it
would be useful to have these accounts set up in case they are unable or
unwilling to pick up at Malin. Also I have added an account number for
Turlock to SCL.  SCL has been willing to do Buy/Resales from their system to
Malin recently and this should be useful given that Snohomish has recently
been unwilling to do so.

TURLOCK to SCL  790612

These numbers have all been added to the RT BPA Account #'s spreadsheet in
P:/realtime.  Thank you for your attention to this matter.


-----Original Message-----
From: john.d.williamson@us.andersen.com
[mailto:john.d.williamson@us.andersen.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 11:05 AM
To: awhite@ktvd.com; BLagodna@aol.com;
chandu.v.chilakapati@us.andersen.com; anthony.r.coghlan@us.andersen.com;
DWC3@pge.com; kblume@logicon.com; laurie.p.klumb@us.andersen.com;
jlynch@xemkt.com; Rappold@aol.com; sakom@attglobal.net;
Reese_Spears@NEXGENW2K.nexgeninc.com; steven.r.thornton@us.andersen.com;
Lucci, Paul T.; lance.e.workman@us.andersen.com
Subject: My life

Way too close to home!

Male Maturity

When I was 14, I hoped that one day I would have a girlfriend.

When I was 16 I got a girlfriend, but there was no passion. So I decided I
needed a
passionate girl with a zest for life.

In college I dated a passionate girl, but she was too emotional. Everything
was an emergency;
she was a drama queen, cried all the time and threatened suicide.

So I decided I needed a girl with stability.

When I was 25 I found a very stable girl but she was boring. She was
totally
predictable and
never got excited about anything. Life became so dull that I decided that I
needed a girl with some
excitement.

When I was 28 I found an exciting girl, but I couldn't keep up with her.
She
rushed from one
thing to another, never settling on anything. She did mad impetuous things
and made me miserable as often as happy. She was great fun initially and
very energetic, but directionless.

So I decided to find a girl with some real ambition.

When I turned 31, I found a smart ambitious girl with her feet planted
firmly on the
ground and married her.

She was so ambitious that she divorced me and took everything I owned.

Now I am 49 and just looking for a girl with big tits.
*******************Internet Email Confidentiality Footer*******************

Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message.  If
you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for
delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this
message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly
notify the sender by reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your
employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind.
Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not
relate to the official business of my firm shall be understood as neither
given nor endorsed by it.


Your message

  Subject:

was not delivered to:

  frmen1@epelectric.com

because:

  User frmen1 (frmen1@epelectric.com) not listed in public Name & Address Book

 - C.DTF
Received: from postmaster.enron.com ([192.152.140.9])          by
mail.epelectric.com (Lotus Domino Release 5.0.5)          with SMTP id
2001022720405190:17037 ;          Tue, 27 Feb 2001 20:40:51 -0700
Received: from mailman.enron.com (mailman.enron.com [192.168.189.66]) by
postmaster.enron.com (8.8.8/8.8.8/postmaster-1.00) with ESMTP id DAA17412 for
<frmen1@epelectric.com>; Wed, 28 Feb 2001 03:40:50 GMT
From: Mark.Guzman@enron.com
Received: from nahou-msmsw02px.corp.enron.com ([172.28.10.38]) by
mailman.enron.com (8.10.1/8.10.1/corp-1.05) with ESMTP id f1S3ena26581 for
<frmen1@epelectric.com>; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 21:40:50 -0600 (CST)
Received: from ene-mta01.enron.com (unverified) by
nahou-msmsw02px.corp.enron.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.1.5) with ESMTP
id <Tac1c0a2651fe415270@nahou-msmsw02px.corp.enron.com> for
<frmen1@epelectric.com>; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 21:40:44 -0600
To: frmen1@epelectric.com
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 19:32:45 -0800
Message-ID: <OF751687EE.756F0753-ON88256A01.00135721@enron.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on ENE-MTA01/Enron(Release 5.0.6 |December
14, 2000) at 02/27/2001 09:38:07 PM, Itemize by SMTP Server on
MAIL/EPEC(Release 5.0.5 |September 22, 2000) at 02/27/2001 08:41:01 PM,
Serialize by Router on MAIL/EPEC(Release 5.0.5 |September 22, 2000) at
02/27/2001 08:41:04 PM, Itemize by SMTP Server on ENE-MTA01/Enron(Release
5.0.6 |December 14, 2000) at 02/27/2001 09:38:43 PM, Serialize by Router on
ECTHOU-LNHUB1/ECT(Release 5.0.1 (Intl)|16 July 1999) at 02/27/2001 09:41:22 PM
X-Notes-Item: , CN=ENE-MTA01/O=Enron, CN=ENE-NS03/O=Enron; type=501;
flags=44; name=$UpdatedBy
X-Notes-Item: CN=ENE-MTA01/O=Enron, CN=ENE-MTA01/O=Enron,
CN=ENE-NS03/O=Enron; type=501; flags=0; name=RouteServers
X-Notes-Item: 27-Feb-2001 21:38:43 CST/27-Feb-2001 21:38:43 CST
=?us-ascii?q?=2C_?= =?us-ascii?q?27-Feb-2001?= 21:38:43 CST/27-Feb-2001
21:38:43 CST =?us-ascii?q?=2C_?= =?us-ascii?q?27-Feb-2001?= 21:41:22
CST/27-Feb-2001 21:41:23 CST; type=401; flags=0; name=RouteTimes
X-Notes-Item: AD171936:F381F81C-86256A01:001405E9; type=4; name=$Orig
X-Notes-Item: 0; name=$MsgTrackFlags
X-Notes-Item: 44; type=300; name=$Hops
X-Notes-Item: ENRON; name=FromDomain
X-Notes-Item: Memo; name=Form
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Content-type: multipart/mixed;
Boundary="0__=88256A01001357218f9e8a93df938690918c88256A0100135721"
Content-Disposition: inline

(See attached file: EPE_FEB_2001.xls)

Click on the tab for the 28th
 - EPE_FEB_2001.xls


hi there:
how are you doing? have you told the company anything yet? i am thinking you probably had to turn ole pattie down... was she devestated that you won't be her new BFF?

let me know how it went, and i hope things are going well on the whole "looking for a job" front. I know it can be so frustrating.

have you spoken with matt????  any more updates with that?

happy valentines (even though it is a dumb holiday)

Take care
bonnie


Greg, when did you send this? I just got it today. Ben

-----Original Message-----
From: Greg.Whalley@enron.com [SMTP:Greg.Whalley@enron.com]
Sent: None
To: Benjamin Bergfelt
Subject: RE: power companies

heard a rumor that EIX may file for bankruptcy on wednesday.

----Original Message-----
   >From:      "Benjamin Bergfelt" <ben.bergfelt@painewebber.com>
   >To:             "'gregwhalley@yahoo.com'"
<gregwhalley@yahoo.com>,"'greg.whalley@Enron.com'" <greg.whalley@enron.com>
   >Cc:
   >Bcc:
   >Subj:      power companies
   >Sent:      Monday, December 11, 2000 5:47 PM
   >
   >Greg, Fitch is reducing credit ratings on the CA utilities, EIX and
PCG, Moody's is considering it. The news wire said PG&E(PCG) is going to be
at 6 Billion by the end of December in the whole. More should be available
in the AM. Ben


Room 3259 - phone, printer and Fax machine
Room 3260 - phone
Room 32C2 - phone and analog line

Room 3376 - Phone and analog line and printer
Room 3371 - phone and polycom and fax machine

Room 2991 - two phones and analog line
Room 2993 (hallway) - fax machine and analog line
Room 2994 phone and printer

Room 2946 - phone
Room 2945 - phone and printer and fax machine
Room 2947 - phone

Lance D Jameson, PMP

Sent by Blackberry Wireless


EMAZING Home[IMAGE]Edit Your ProfilePrivacy

		Advice and Living - Brain Candy - Business and Money - Comics - Daybreakers -
Entertainment
		Espaol - Games - Good Thoughts - Grapevine - Greetings - Health - Hobbies -
Horoscopes
		Household Hints- Kitchen - Music - Sports - Style - Technology - Travel -
Wireless

		[IMAGE]

		FREE TRIAL software to organize digital photo!
		FlipAlbum is a *ZDNet 5-Star* software that organizes digital photos/graphics
into cool 3D page-flipping photo albums. Play music while viewing them, email
them & run slide shows. FREE long distance with every trial download. Click
here for more details.

		Internet Tip of the Day
		Thursday December 7, 2000

		Safe Cable and DSL

		One of the biggest problems with cable modems and DSL (and other '"always-on"
Internet options) is a static IP address (your computer's Internet address).
With a dial-up service, your IP address changes each time you log on. With
"always-on" service, your IP address doesn't change, which can make it an
inviting target for viruses and cybervandals. Lots of cable and DSL services
have pretty good firewalls, software that prevents unauthorized access to
your PC or network. If your ISP doesn't, you can add one yourself, but how do
you know if you're protected? Steve Gibson has the answer. Gibson Research
Corp (www.grc.com) specializes in computer security products and services.
One great feature of his Web site is his ShieldsUP! Page, which probes your
computer (harmlessly) and then tells you how vulnerable it is to attack and
what you need to do to secure it. I was pleased to find that my PC is pretty
secure from cyberattack, despite my cable modem.! If you need a firewall,
Steve has all the info you need. Be smart -- check your system's
vulnerability today.

		Click here to visit GRC's Shields UP! page

		- Dennis Ryan

		Email  this tip to a friend - Browse  the Archives

		Today's Science & Technology News:

		Colorado Trickle?
		The once-mighty Colorado River is in serious decline, say palenotologists who
studied clam shells to gauge the environmental impact of decades of
re-engineering. Shuttle astronauts will try again today to take the slack out
of one of the space station's new solar wings. And northern Europe and
Britain may be in for more stormy, wet weather. Also -- the battle over
cleaning up the Hudson -- US gets a "C" in science & math -- botulism
outbreak kills Lake Erie birds --  Click  here to read more!

		[IMAGE]

		The holidays are here!
		So get your warm wishes and season's greetings out to all with EMAZING's
eGreetings! They're fun, FREE, and cover all those merry, bright, and
seasonal occasions.

		 Get satellite television in only one step.
		Click here for more information on FREE satellite TV!

		   12 Days of Christmas Sweepstakes - Brought to you by adiamondisforever.com
		Enter our sweepstakes for a chance to win 12 fabulous gifts, Including a
Diamond Solitaire Necklace.

		   Don't spend Christmas without the Grinch...
		Save up to 40% at Amazon's Dr. Seuss Shop!

		   End those last minute gift hassles forever!
		Try Flooz!  The online gift currency you send by email!

		[IMAGE]
		[IMAGE]

		Tip Gift
		@Home Internet Service
		Surf faster! Click here to learn about the nation's #1 broadband Internet
service

		Book
		BOOK  OF THE DAY
		Olaf Olafsson: The Journey Home

		CD
		CD  OF THE DAY
		Enya: A Day Without Rain

		Gift
		 GIFT  OF THE DAYNintendo: Hey You, Pikachu!

		DVD
		MOVIE  OF THE DAY (DVD)
		George Clooney: The Perfect Storm

		VHS
		MOVIE  OF THE DAY (VHS)
		Fantasia 2000

		Quote
		QUOTE  OF THE DAY
		Only those who dare to fail greatly can ever achieve greatly.
		- Robert F. Kennedy

		[IMAGE]
		[IMAGE]

		  Music is a way to escape the mundane world!
		And that's exactly what you can do with these FREE audio tips! Learn how to
take good care of your audio equipment, how to get the best sound for your
listening pleasure, or how to keep your mom from telling you to turn it down
(with the best headphones for your money)! Tune in to EMAZING's Audio Tip of
the Day! Click  here for more details.

		[IMAGE]
		?
		Advertise - Company Info - Feedback - Help - Jobs - Privacy Policy - Terms &
Conditions
		Archives - Edit Your Profile -?Unsubscribe

		EMAZING.com is a service of EMAZING, INC. Copyright 2000. All Rights Reserved.
		EMAZING.com - Whatever you're into, we email it to you. FREE!
[IMAGE]


FYI...
If you have any questions please contact me.
<http://www.nerc.com/~filez/is.html>  - is0401m.pdf - IS Meeting Minutes - April 23-25, 2001 (Draft)

Thanks
Don Lacen
Public Service Company of New Mexico
Transmission Services Coordinator
Alvarado Square, MS EP11
Albuquerque, NM, 87158
505-241-2032
dlacen@pnm.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Glenda Rodriguez [<mailto:Glenda.Rodriguez@nerc.net>]
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2001 10:06 AM
To: Interchange Subcommittee
Subject: Interchange Subcommittee Meeting Minutes Posted

Dear Members:

The following Interchange Subcommittee meeting minutes have been posted
to the NERC web site:

<http://www.nerc.com/~filez/is.html>

is0601m.pdf             IS Meeting Minutes - June 27-29, 2001 (Draft)
is0401m.pdf             IS Meeting Minutes - April 23-25, 2001 (Draft)

Please contact me if you have any questions.

Sincerely,

Glenda Rodriguez


>
>Wednesday, June 6, 2001 08:18 PM
>
><!--TEXT-->
>
>By Jason Leopold
>
>Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES
>
>LOS ANGELES (Dow Jones)--California utility regulators appear ready to
>vote next
>week on a proposal to suspend the ability of large electricity users to sign
>contracts directly with energy suppliers.
>
>The move is called for in the February bill that put the state in the power
>business, but its approval by the California Public Utilities Commission
>would
>damp plans in the Legislature to reduce the burden on Edison International
>(EIX)
>unit Southern California Edison by making large industrial customers
>responsible
>for securing their own power.
>
>"We're still trying to figure that out," said an aide to Assembly Speaker Pro
>Tem Fred Keeley, D-Boulder Creek. "We don't know how to get around that right
>now."
>
>Keeley is expected to introduce legislation to shift the burden of rescuing
>Southern California Edison to large businesses. Under the proposal, which is
>also supported by Assembly Speaker Robert Hertzberg, customers that use 500
>kilowatt-hours of power a month or more would pay a surcharge on their
>bills to
>help Southern California Edison recoup its losses on wholesale power.
>
>The so-called direct-access component - under those large users would buy
>their
>power from suppliers - is the cornerstone of the Keeley plan, for which Enron
>has been lobbying hard in recent weeks, according to several aides to key
>legislators.
>
>The Keeley plan is an alternative to the memorandum of understanding Gov.
>Gray
>Davis signed with Southern California Edison two months ago. Under that
>proposal, the state would buy Southern California Edison's power lines for
>$2.76
>billion and allow the utility to issue $2 billion in bonds backed by
>ratepayers
>to recover $3.5 billion in net uncollected power costs.
>
>That plan has run into snags in the Legislature, which must enact it into
>law,
>and the PUC, which has been slow to rule on enabling measures.
>
>One key Democratic Senator said the PUC's move to quash direct access is an
>attempt to ensure a deal to rescue Southern California Edison doesn't pass
>through the Legislature.
>
>"The PUC has demonstrated it does not want SoCal Ed to remain solvent," the
>senator said. "They have dragged their feet on several key issues they
>need to
>address in order to make sure legislation to save the utility is never
heard."
>
>A PUC spokesman didn't return calls for comment.
>
>Direct-access was the key part of the state's 1996 deregulation law, giving
>retail customers the opportunity to choose from a variety of energy
>suppliers in
>an effort to lower their electric rates.
>
>Commissioners Richard Bilas and Henry Duque said they support direct
>access and
>would vote against any measure to reverse it.
>
>"I would never vote against direct access," said Bilas, a Republican, who
>authored the agenda item. Bilas said the item was amended by another
>commissioner.
>
>The measure could be held, because it might disrupt negotiations between the
>Legislature and Southern California Edison, said PUC Commissioner Geoffrey
>Brown, a Democrat.
>
>The PUC may be looking to protect the state's interest as a power purchaser,
>some legislative aides said.
>
>The DWR's long-term power supply contracts cover the state's wholesale-market
>power needs in 2002 and 2003. If large industrial customers were to sign
>direct-access contracts, the DWR would lose them as customers and thus
>fail to
>collect enough revenue to pay off the long-term contracts.
>
>The agency could be stuck with a large surplus of electricity that it
>would be
>forced to sell it on the open market at a loss. The market price of power
>in the
>coming years is expected to be lower than what the state paid for forward
>power
>in 2001.
>
>Wholesale power prices plunged this week, and the DWR for the first time sold
>excess power on the open market, according to Oscar Hidalgo, DWR spokesman.
>
>Arnold Rosenthal, of Newport Beach-based Utility Resource Management
>Group, an
>organization that represents more than 700 large electricity users in the
>state,
>said state regulators are "looking to get us back into a mode where we are
>held
>captive once again."
>
>"The DWR is acting as this super utility," Rosenthal said. "What you're left
>with is absolutely no choice. Instead, we'll be subjected to several large
>rate
>increases."
>
>Rosenthal said some of his San Diego clients have direct access deals. A
>number
>of clients served by Southern California Edison want to sign direct-access
>contracts to escape recent rate increases imposed by the PUC.
>
>-By Jason Leopold, Dow Jones Newswires; 323-658-3874;
>jason.leopold@dowjones.com
>
>
>2001 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------
>This article on the Excite Money and Investing Channel is produced by
>Quicken.com, the objective source for making the most of your money.
>Visit Excite Money and Investing at http://quicken.excite.com next time
>you need financial news, stock quotes, portfolio services, or information
>about taxes, mortgages, and insurance.


EnronOnline
Trade Counts and Volume for May 14, 2001
			EXTERNAL		INTERNAL		TOTAL
COUNTRY	COMMODITY	CATEGORY	COUNT	QTY	COUNT	QTY	COUNT	QTY	UNIT OF MEASURE
Austria	Power	Physical	        13 	           10,300 	        -
  -   	        13 	           10,300 	MWh
Belgium	Natural Gas	Physical	        10 	      1,065,000 	        -
   -   	        10 	      1,065,000 	MMBtu
Canada	Natural Gas	Financial	          7 	      3,655,000 	          1
155,000 	          8 	      3,810,000 	MMBtu
Canada	Natural Gas	Physical	      235 	    14,076,271 	        -
-   	      235 	    14,076,271 	MMBtu
Canada	Power	Financial	        18 	           20,642 	        -
  -   	        18 	           20,642 	MWh (Canada)
France	Power	Physical	          1 	             4,741 	        -
   -   	          1 	             4,741 	MWh
Germany	Power	Physical	        68 	         239,804 	        -
 -   	        68 	         239,804 	MWh
Netherlands	Power	Physical	          1 	                600 	        -
         -   	          1 	                600 	MWh
Norway	Power	Financial	        23 	         441,192 	        -
 -   	        23 	         441,192 	MWh
Singapore	Crude	Financial	          1 	           50,000 	          1
50,000 	          2 	         100,000 	Barrel
Singapore	Oil Products	Financial	          1 	         150,000 	        -
    -   	          1 	         150,000 	Barrel
Switzerland	Power	Physical	        26 	           36,593 	        -
      -   	        26 	           36,593 	MWh
United Kingdom	Crude	Financial	          3 	         350,000 	          2
50,000 	          5 	         400,000 	Barrel
United Kingdom	LPG	Financial	          3 	           10,000 	        -
  -   	          3 	           10,000 	mt
United Kingdom	Metals	Financial	      500 	           10,830 	        81
1,625 	      581 	           12,455 	LME Registered mt Lot
United Kingdom	Natural Gas	Physical NBP	      135 	    19,881,050 	          2
95,000 	      137 	    19,976,050 	MMBtu
United Kingdom	Oil Products	Financial	          1 	           22,350 	        -
   -   	          1 	           22,350 	Barrel per month
United Kingdom	Oil Products	Financial	          3 	           15,000 	        -
   -   	          3 	           15,000 	IPE mt
United Kingdom	Power	Physical	        13 	         846,720 	        -
 -   	        13 	         846,720 	MWh
United Kingdom	Sea Freight	Financial	          1 	                  15 	          1
     15 	          2 	                  30 	Sea Freight Lots
USA	Coal	Physical	          1 	                    4 	        -
  -   	          1 	                    4 	COAL-Tons/Barges/Mnth
USA	Crude	Financial	      162 	      7,225,000 	        97 	      3,915,000
259 	    11,140,000 	Barrel
USA	Crude	Financial Option	          2 	           75,000 	          1 	           50,000
          3 	         125,000 	Barrel
USA	Crude	Physical	          8 	      1,143,000 	        -
-   	          8 	      1,143,000 	Barrel
USA	Emissions	Physical	          2 		        -   		          2
-   	Emission allowance
USA	Gas Pipeline Capacity	Physical	          2 	           20,000 	        -
       -   	          2 	           20,000 	MMBtu
USA	LPG	Financial	          2 	           55,000 	        -
-   	          2 	           55,000 	Gallon
USA	LPG	Physical	          1 	             5,000 	        -
-   	          1 	             5,000 	Gallon
USA	Lumber	Physical	          4 	                  14 	        -
   -   	          4 	                  14 	Thousand Board Feet
USA	Natural Gas	Financial	      874 	  337,955,873 	      389 	  126,439,578 	   1,263
 464,395,451 	MMBtu
USA	Natural Gas	Financial Option	          9 	      9,010,000 	          3 	      3,000,000
       12 	    12,010,000 	MMBtu
USA	Natural Gas	Physical	   1,808 	    16,749,218 	        41 	         781,899
1,849 	    17,531,117 	MMBtu
USA	Oil Products	Financial	        38 	         854,524 	          3 	           30,715
    41 	         885,239 	Barrel
USA	Paper	Physical	          1 	                  40 	        -
  -   	          1 	                  40 	Metric Tons (+/- 5%)
USA	Petchems	Financial	          1 	           30,000 	        -
   -   	          1 	           30,000 	Gallon
USA	Power	Financial	        27 	         244,469 	        10 	           67,530
    37 	         311,999 	MWh
USA	Power	Physical	      427 	      4,371,728 	      154 	      2,483,741 	      581
      6,855,468 	MWh
USA	Rate and Currency	Financial	        -   	                   -   	          3
5,900,000 	          3 	      5,900,000 	EUR/1
USA	Rate and Currency	Financial	        -   	                   -   	          2
4,000,000 	          2 	      4,000,000 	FX USD
USA	Rate and Currency	Financial	        -   	                   -   	          3
1,090,000 	          3 	      1,090,000 	GBP/1
USA	Rate and Currency	Financial	        -   	                   -   	          3
1,154,000 	          3 	      1,154,000 	USD/1
USA	Weather	Financial	          6 	                  14 	        -
     -   	          6 	                  14 	Cooling Degree Day
			   4,438 		      797 		   5,235


Well, we are at least making news.

Regards,

Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Garner, Bruce
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 8:36 AM
To: McMahon, Jeffrey
Cc: Bowen Jr., Raymond
Subject: Metal Bulletin news: Enron generates anger

FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Bruce Garner/LON/ECT on 11/05/2001 14:23
---------------------------

Jason Seigal
11/05/2001 09:21
To: Bruce Garner/LON/ECT@ECT, Greg Hermans/Enron@EnronXGate, Kevin
O'Donnell/Enron@enronXGate, Sean Keenan/Enron@EnronXGate
cc:

Subject: Metal Bulletin news: Enron generates anger

---------------------- Forwarded by Jason Seigal/LON/ECT on 11/05/2001 09:22
---------------------------

Homan Amiry
10/05/2001 11:04
To: Jason Seigal/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Metal Bulletin news: Enron generates anger

FYI

Hotline
Enron generates anger London 10 May 2001 09:14 - An Enron executive was
greeted with lots of scepticism and even some anger at the Steel Service
Center Institute's annual meeting in California this week. Enron Industrial
Markets ceo Jeffrey McMahon included amongst his top ten reasons for Enron's
&market making8 foray into the steel business a perceived lack of
dependability amongst US mills as well as their practice of treating
customers (except automakers) as &annoyances8. An unidentified mill executive
in the crowd rose during the Q&A session to pointedly challenge McMahon's
accusations. Another mill executive was overheard complaining that he felt as
though he had just been held up as a &liar and a cheat8. Enron seems to
relish its role as enemy of the steel status quo. The final slide of
McMahon's presentation to the SSCI touted its recognition as the &pushiest8
company in the metals business last year - an award bestowed, somewhat
tongue-in-cheek, last December by MB...


Not sure how did a change this is going to be.  I tried to get into the Feb
training classes but was told the classes were full.  Do you want me to sign
up for one of the March classes?????
---------------------- Forwarded by Patrick Hanse/HOU/ECT on 02/21/2001 04:45
PM ---------------------------

"William J. Head" <wj.head@mapp.org>@mapp.org on 02/21/2001 04:24:26 PM
Sent by: owner-rtc@mapp.org
To: <rin@mapp.org>, <rtc@mapp.org>, <mrc@mapp.org>, <sot-trainers@mapp.org>,
<sotwg@mapp.org>, <mc@mapp.org>, <rrc@mapp.org>, <pemmem@mapp.org>
cc: <sco@mapp.org>, <sl.duncan@mapp.org>, <ca.anderson@mapp.org>
Subject: OASIS 1.4 Conversion Status - 2/28 - 3/1 Cutover Plan

To:        ALL OASIS USERS

From:    Tami Anderson, MAPP Transmission Operations
      Dan Fredrickson, MAPP Transmission Operations
      Jolene Gleason, MAPP Transmission Operations

Date:      Wednesday, February 21, 2001

Subject:   OASIS 1.4 Conversion on 3/1/2001 Update

This is a notice to update the OASIS users on the status of the MAPP
implementation of the 1.4 version of OASIS.

Several processes are on-going in an effort to meet the March 1, 2001 OASIS
1.4 production date.  These include:

1. Communication process:

   a. OASIS Workshop: Feb 14-16:
There were 88 workshop attendees.

   b. For the OASIS users who were unable to attend this Workshop and are
still interested in taking the class, MAPP Staff is offering two more
classes
on March 20-21. There will be two more lecture / lab sessions, the first
starting the morning of the 20th and ending late in the day on the 20th, the
second starting midday on the 20th and ending midday on the 21st, and the
third starting the morning of the 21st and ending late in the day on the
21st. Please send an email (if you have not already
done so) to sl.duncan@mapp.org or call at (651) 632-8422 if you are
interested in attending one of these classes.

2.  Implementation process:

   a. OASIS 1.4 Beta Releases and bug fixes continue to be released by ESCA
(the JTSIN vendor) on a daily basis.  The production software release will
be on Friday, February, 23:

OASIS 1.4 Beta Release #3 is located at:
http://mappb3.oasis.mapp.org/OASIS14/NODE/MAPPB3
The only requirement to use this test node is a valid Tradewave certificate.
Please send an email to ds.fredrickson@mapp.org to indicate any problems
that are encountered while testing this beta release.

   b. MAPP Validation and Request Evaluation Processes revised:
MAPP Staff is working with OATI to implement the modifications required to
the automated processes due to the OASIS 1.4 changes.  Testing will continue
through the
month of February.

   c. February 28 / March 1 Cutover Plan

The OASIS 1.4 functionality specified by FERC includes numerous changes to
business practices and OASIS requirements.   The JTSIN group is modifying
the OASIS to be compliant.  Members and Staff need to be prepared to perform
the cutover to OASIS 1.4 during a 12 hour period beginning at 1800 on
February 28 and ending 0600 on March 1.

Our objective is to cutover to OASIS 1.4 within two hours.  This is,
however, a best case scenario, so customers should be prepared for a more
extended outage of OASIS.

All communication from the MAPP Center just prior to and during the cutover
wil be via e-mail and the MCN.

E-mail communication during the cutover will be via the rin@mapp.org  list
only.

All communication sent via rin@mapp.org will also be broadcast to all MCN
sites.

Telephone communication, if necessary, should be done through the
Transaction Coordinator Help Line (651) 632 - 8508.

Cutover Schedule  (Tentative; best case scenario)

February 28, 2001

1800   Shut down access to the MAPP OASIS by the outside world.
Complete processing of all requests currently residing on OASIS.

1815   Shut down all OASIS and related backend applications.
Back up OASIS 1.3 databases.

1830   Perform OASIS 1.4 database and software modifications.

1930   Start up modified backend applications.
      Test processing of transmission requests.

2000   Enable access to the MAPP OASIS by the outside world.

Processing of Transmission Requests During Shutdown

It is preferable that no transmission requests be received during the
shutdown.  Customers are requested to complete as much business prior to
shutdown as possible, and to enter any transactions that occur during the
shutdown after-the-fact when OASIS is back on-line.   Customers must be
prepared to submit requests in OASIS 1.4 formats when OASIS comes back
on-line, and realize that this may be prior to midnight.  If prevailing
transmission system conditions allow, short duration tags will be accepted
without reservations during the shutdown, at the discretion of the Senior
Security Center Operator on duty and the Transaction Coordinator on duty.

If it appears that the shutdown will last longer than two hours, alternative
means of accepting transmission requests may be implemented.

Thank you.

Tami A. Anderson
MAPP Senior Engineer
ta.anderson@mapp.org
Phone: 651-632-8423

Dan Fredrickson
Supervisor
ds.fredrickson@mapp.org
Phone: 651-632-8441
Fax:     651-632-8417

Jolene Gleason
MAPP Senior Engineer
jl.gleason@mapp.org
Phone: 651-632-8444


Hi all,
The scheduled Wednesday (Nov. 8) presentation has to be cancelled.  Even
though in his earlier message
Mike said Wednesday is ok, now they will have problem sending people.

I will try to reschedule the presentation to a later date.

Best,
Alex

---------------------- Forwarded by Alex Huang/Corp/Enron on 11/07/2000 07:54
AM ---------------------------

Denton Mike <Michael.Denton@caminus.com> on 11/06/2000 04:31:19 PM
To: Alex.Huang@enron.com
cc: "Scanlan, Brian" <Brian.Scanlan@caminus.com>, "Rookley, Cameron"
<Cameron.Rookley@caminus.com>

Subject: RE: WeatherDelta demonstration scheduling

Alex, I'm glad that we had a chance to talk today about a WeatherDelta
overview.  The 8th is not really going to work well for us, due to recent
reschedulings.  Several members of the WeatherDelta team will be in or near
Houston on the 14th and 15th of November (I know that you said that week was
tight), and could arrange to be in the several weeks following those dates.

I have attached our standard non-disclosure agreement, which we will need to
execute prior to the product demonstration.  I have also attached a reprint
of a recent article, describing WeatherDelta's approach and functionality.
As soon as a meeting can be scheduled, a list of attendees would be very
helpful to us in preparing the appropriate materials.

Thank you again,

Michael Denton
CAMINUS
212-515-3600

 - Caminus NDA-Unilat.doc
 - WeatherDelta-wp.pdf


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	Bill Kohl/Object-Oriented Programming for Business People Conference room EB40C2

Date:		1/19/2001
Time:		11:00 AM - 1:00 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


Dale,

Here are the confirms for the Gas Daily option products that I need created.
The product has no special requirements for setting the strike etc.
if there are any questions please call me asap. I would like to have these
products online by the October expiry which is next wWednesday.
Please let me know when it will be possible

Thanks
---------------------- Forwarded by Peter F Keavey/HOU/ECT on 09/19/2000
03:30 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Dutch Quigley                           09/19/2000 03:27 PM

To: Peter F Keavey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: options confirms

Pete,

Let me know if this is OK

Dutch


This is just a reminder that there is a confidentiality agreement between ENA
and CES regarding the retail business that prohibits ENA wholesale from
discussing any aspect of the CES Retail business with EES.  If you receive
any calls from EES people about the CES retail business, please inform them
of this prohibition on discussions. If we receive consent from CEG/Nisource
at some point in time, I will let you know.  Thank you.

---------------------- Forwarded by Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT on 03/08/2000
08:18 AM ---------------------------

Patrick Conner
03/07/2000 02:46 PM
To: Ed McMichael/HOU/ECT@ECT, Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T
Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: CES Retail Energy Sale

I have confirmed after talking with Jeff Hodge that ENA and EES cannot
discuss anything regarding the CES retail business.  Both the CA and the
Retail Agreement have sections that explicity mention that  ENA has to keep
information confidential.   I talked with Jeff Golden, who is working on the
EES side and mentioned that there can be no discussions between EES and ENA
regarding the CES Retail business without first gaining the written consent
of Nisource/CEG.

Jeff - If I have misstated anything, please let me know.

Patrick


Wouldn't it be nice to not have a fire drill at the end? At least we will be
ready.

I'm can't wait to see what their lenders will come up with.  Ben's hoping it
will fall through and he can sell these again, I think.

Kay

"Reuter, Marisa" <MReuter@KSLAW.com> on 05/25/2001 08:12:49 AM
To: "'Kay.Mann@enron.com'" <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc: "Keffer, John" <JKeffer@KSLAW.com>

Subject: RE: NorthWestern

Great.  I will focus on the closing checklist to ensure that all of ENA's
closing deliveries are in order well before closing.

MIR

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 6:24 PM
To: Reuter, Marisa
Cc: Keffer, John
Subject: RE: NorthWestern

Thanks.

Did I tell you that I spoke with GE about the assignment, and their initial
response was very positive.

NorthWestern is predicting closing in July.

Kay

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.


Start Date: 1/17/02; HourAhead hour: 5;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002011705.txt
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database


Brent:  We'll call you at 2 pm Houston time.  Thanks.  Sara


Mark:
The defined term "Commercial Term" which is contained in the Apendix I to the
EPC gtcs should have been modified to reflect the definitional changes made
in Section 1.1 of the gtcs.  I"ll work with Nony to get it corrected.

To: Nony Flores/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janice R
Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael A Robison/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: On-line GTC's for Enron Petrochemicals Company (EPC)

I have gone ahead and forwarded this and the ECFC version to the EOL people
to be uploaded.

I do have a concern though that I wanted to ask you about. These GTC's use
the defined term "Commercial Term" which is defined as follows:

"Commercial Terms" means that part of this Agreement confirming in writing
the specific terms of a Transaction which may be in any form adequate at law
that is issued in connection with a Transaction.

We have taken the position in our other EOL trading that the transaction is
complete and binding from the time we accept the counterparty's offer over
the system by reference to the GTC, the numbers submitted by the counterparty
(usually volume and price) and the Long Description.  We've gone to some
lengths to make sure that the combination of GTC, website numbers and Long
Description contain all of the necessary terms.  It's not clear to me that we
intend the website numbers and Long Description to satisfy the definition of
Commercial Terms.  Are these transactions not intended to be binding until
the confirmation is signed?  Any thoughts on this?

Nony Flores
01/11/2000 06:09 PM
To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janice R
Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael A Robison/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Steven M Elliott/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: On-line GTC's for Enron Petrochemicals Company (EPC)

Mark -

Last week Dale Neuner was requested to add four new commodities to on-line
trading and Mike Robison and Steve Elliott have reviewed and approved the
long descriptions for benzene, mixed xylene, toluene and methanol.   We have
also finalized the form of GTC's for EPC (who trades benzene, xylene and
toluene) and are forwarding them to you for further distribution.

Note:  GTC's for Enron Clean Fuels Company (who trades methanol) will follow
on Wednesday.

Thanks.
Nony Flores
Ext. 3-7541


---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 11/01/2000 01:47 PM
---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Jackie Gallagher" <JGallagher@epsa.org>
11/01/2000 12:58 PM

To: <bhawkin@enron.com>, <bmerola@enron.com>, <christi.l.nicolay@enron.com>,
<janelle.scheuer@enron.com>, <jhartso@enron.com>, <Mary.Hain@enron.com>,
<sarah.novosel@enron.com>, <tom.hoatson@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Requests to Speak at FERC's November 9th Conference on California

MEMORANDUM

TO: Regulatory Affairs Committee
       Power Marketing Working Group

FROM: Donald Santa, Regulatory Affairs Committee Chair
            Joe Hartsoe, Power Marketing Working Group Chair
            Julie Simon, Vice President of Policy
            Mark Bennett, Senior Manager of Policy
            Erin Perrigo, Manager of Policy

DATE: November 1, 2000

RE: Requests to Speak at FERC's November 9th Conference on California

Attached is FERC's Notice of the November 9th Conference, scheduling the
meeting and setting out procedures for requesting an opportunity to speak.
The conference will be held in Washington, at FERC's headquarters, beginning
at 9:00 a.m.  Requests to speak should be directed to the Commission's
Secretary, David Boergers, by e-mail and in writing, by Friday, November
3rd.  Requests to speak should include the name, title and company or parties
the speaker represents, along with a brief (not to exceed one page) sumary of
the issues the speaker wishes to address.  Please let us know if you request
a speaking opportunity, so we can attempt to follow-up with the FERC staff.

In addition, we will host a pre-meeting for those attending the FERC
conference in our conference room on Wednesday, November 8th, from 2:00 to
5:00 p.m.  In combination with our weekly conference call we can prepare for
the FERC conference and begin planning our comments on today's order.

If you have any questions, please contact Julie Simon at 202-789-7200 or
jsimon@epsa.org.

 - meeting.pdf


Hi, Sharon!

I have a rush project.  Can you check on your end and send me any masters between ECC and Conoco Canada Limited and Gulf Canada Resources Limited?

We have to respond to Conoco by 2:00 p.m. (Houston time) today.

THANKS!!!!!

Marie


<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">

<BASE HREF="http://football291.fantasy.sportsline.com/mp/">

Attention Fantasy Players! Cant find that perfect gift? Let MVP.com make it easy for you! Save 10% on your next purchase when you purchase a Gift Certificate from now until 12/27/01. Click Here for Details.

Brought to you by

<MAP NAME="menu.map">
<AREA shape="rect" coords="0, 1, 83, 25"
href="http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/1/217/sffer1218e.cgi">

<AREA shape="rect" coords="83, 1, 166, 25"
href="http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/1/226/sffer1218c.cgi">

<AREA shape="rect" coords="166, 1, 249, 25"
href="http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/1/223/sffer1218v.cgi">

<AREA shape="rect" coords="249, 1, 332, 25"
href="http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/1/163/sffer1218t.cgi">

<AREA shape="rect" coords="332, 1, 415, 25"
href="http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/5/3/sffer1218ftl.cgi">

</MAP>

You are receiving these e-reports because you have signed up for
    CBS SportsLine.com Fantasy Football.  To customize, reschedule,
    or turn off these reports please
    click here

Standings, Summary

AFC Division

Team	W	L	T	Pct	Back	Strk
Div	Wks	PF	Back	PA

President Taft	13	2	0	0.867	0.0	W3	7-1-0	1.0	1298.0	163.0	938.0

Team Chick	7	6	2	0.533	5.0	L1	2-5-1	2.5	1370.0	91.0	1334.0

Really Rottens	6	7	1	0.464	6.5	L3	3-3-1
1.0	1040.0	421.0	1065.0

C-Dawg's Boyz	5	9	0	0.357	8.0	L1	4-3-0	1.0	1195.0	266.0	1345.0

Uran Man	4	9	0	0.308	9.0	L2	2-4-0	0.0	1008.0	453.0	1120.0

Dont Mess	3	9	1	0.269	9.5	L1	3-3-0	0.0	831.0	630.0	984.0

Texas Terminators	3	10	0	0.231	10.0	L4	2-4-0	0.0	893.0	568.0	1385.0

NFC Division

Team	W	L	T	Pct	Back	Strk
	Div	Wks	PF	Back	PA

Luccis Losers	11	4	0	0.733	0.0	W4	7-1-0	1.0	1260.0	201.0	1028.0

Blue Balls	9	5	0	0.643	2.0	L2	5-2-0	2.5	1461.0	0.0	1272.0

Grid Iron Goons	8	6	1	0.567	2.5	L1	4-4-0	3.0	1373.0	88.0	1256.0

Houston Big Ballers	7	6	0	0.538	4.0	W2	2-4-0	1.0	1291.0	170.0	1184.0

Team Dick	6	6	1	0.500	4.5	W1	2-4-0	0.0	1117.0	344.0	1093.0

DRock's Beaatchs	7	7	0	0.500	4.0	L2	3-4-0	1.0	1103.0	358.0	1056.0

Orange Roughy	5	8	0	0.385	6.0	L2	1-5-0	1.0	964.0	497.0	1144.0

Statistics, Scoring

Team Chick Actives

Player	Pos	Scoring	Score

Gannon, Rich	QB	249 PaYd (4 Pts), 1 PaTD (4) (6 Pts), 1 PaInt (-1 Pt), 11 RuYd (1 Pt)	10.0

Barber, Tiki	RB	47 RuYd (4 Pts), 24 ReYd (2 Pts)	6.0

Moss, Randy	WR	34 ReYd (3 Pts)	3.0

Owens, Terrell	WR	64 ReYd (6 Pts), 1 ReTD (32) (6 Pts)	12.0

Rice, Jerry	WR	84 ReYd (8 Pts)	8.0

Ward, Hines	WR	67 ReYd (6 Pts), 1 ReTD (5) (6 Pts)	12.0

Stover, Matt	K	3 FG (43,29,43) (12 Pts), 1 XP (1 Pt)	13.0

Saints	DT	48 PA (-10 Pts)	-10.0

TOTALS	 	 	54.0

Team Chick Reserves

Player	Pos	ST	Scoring	Score

Anderson, Richie	RB	RS	10 RuYd (1 Pt), 21 ReYd (2 Pts)	3.0

Carswell, Dwayne	TE	RS	 	0.0

Couch, Tim	QB	RS	203 PaYd (4 Pts), 1 PaTD (3) (6 Pts), 3 PaInt (-3 Pts), 37 RuYd (3 Pts), 1 FL (-1 Pt)	9.0

Dyson, Kevin	WR	RS	30 ReYd (3 Pts), 1 ReTD (30) (6 Pts)	9.0

Galloway, Joey	WR	RS	28 ReYd (2 Pts)	2.0

Richardson, Tony	RB	RS	1 RuTD (1) (6 Pts)	6.0

Walls, Wesley	TE	RS	37 ReYd (3 Pts)	3.0

TOTALS	 	 	 	32.0

NFL Reports, Player Updates

Latest NFL Player News

Jerome Bettis, RB PIT - Blue Balls Updated 12/25/01
Bettis is listed as questionable for Week 16. However, he may be able to return to the Steelers' starting lineup. Bill Cowher said Bettis is progressing, and he will be used this week if healthy.

James Stewart, RB DET - Orange Roughy Updated 12/23/01
Stewart suffered a sprained ankle early in Sunday's game at Pittsburgh. He was replaced by Lamont Warren in the first quarter, and Stewart did not return.

Cameron Cleeland, TE NO - Luccis Losers Updated 12/23/01
Cleeland injured his Achilles tendon on Sunday. He is not expected to play again this season.

Ahman Green, RB GB - Free Agent Updated 12/23/01
Green left Sunday's game in the fourth quarter with labored breathing. He was replaced by Dorsey Levens.

Todd Bouman, QB MIN - Grid Iron Goons
Updated 12/23/01
Bouman was able to start Sunday's game, but he re-injured his thumb in the first quarter and was replaced by Spergon Wynn.

Wesley Walls, TE CAR - Team Chick Updated 12/23/01
Walls was able to play in Sunday's game despite an ankle injury, but he left the game before halftime after spraining his left knee.

Martin Gramatica, K TB - Free Agent Updated 12/23/01

Gramatica injured his hamstring in the fourth quarter on Sunday. He hurt himself on a PAT attempt, but Gramatica is expected to play on December 29.

Todd Bouman, QB MIN - Grid Iron Goons Updated 12/23/01
Bouman is now listed as probable for Sunday's game. He should be able to start against the Jaguars, but he may play with some pain in his thumb.

Jeff Graham, WR SD - Really Rottens Updated 12/23/01

Graham probably won't play Sunday at Kansas City because of the death of his father in a car accident, coach Mike Riley said Friday. If Graham doesn't play, Trevor Gaylor will start in his place and Nate Turner will be signed off the practice squad. The Chargers are already missing their No. 3 receiver, Tim Dwight, due to complications of a collapsed lung.

Antowain Smith, RB NE - Team Dick Updated 12/23/01
Smith rushed for a career-high 156 yards and a touchdown Saturday. He has been one of the best runners in the AFC and will help carry your team to Fantasy glory.

Steve McNair
, QB TEN - Houston Big Ballers Updated 12/23/01
McNair played Saturday despite suffering from back spasms all week. He played well, throwing a touchdown pass in the second half. Expect him to be a solid No. 1 QB.

Jeff Garcia, QB SF - C-Dawg's Boyz Updated 12/23/01
Garcia, whose practice time was limited all week, played in Saturday's game. He admitted afterwards that he has a cracked rib. He played with extra padding, saying it didn't greatly affect his throws. Garcia might not be at full strength in the remaining weeks but he will still be a solid No. 1 Fantasy QB.

Eddie George, RB TEN - Team Dick Updated 12/23/01
George played in Saturday's game despite suffering from an ankle injury. He left in the third quarter because of a neck injury but returned to the game.

Oronde Gadsden, WR MIA - Team Dick Updated 12/23/01
Gadsden did not play in Saturday's game against the Patriots because of a hamstring injury. Chris Chambers started in his absence.

Fred Beasley
, RB SF - Free Agent Updated 12/23/01
Beasley broke his right hand. He will probably be sidelined for the rest of the regular season.

Joe Horn, WR NO - President Taft Updated 12/21/01
Horn is once again performing like an elite Fantasy receiver. He is a must-start player during the final weeks of the NFL season.

Maurice Smith, RB ATL - Dont Mess Updated 12/21/01

A banged-up Smith hasn't done much statistically in recent weeks. Don't depend on him during the Fantasy playoffs.

Donald Hayes, WR CAR - Luccis Losers Updated 12/21/01
Hayes may step back into the forefront this week as the No. 1 wideout in place of Muhsin Muhammad. He isn't very explosive, however, and won't help Fantasy teams much during Weeks 15 through 17.

Chris Weinke, QB CAR - Houston Big Ballers Updated 12/21/01

Consider Weinke as a backup during the Fantasy playoffs. He lacks the weapons to post better-than-average numbers, but he is a good option if you need an emergency QB.

Kurt Warner, QB STL - Luccis Losers Updated 12/21/01
Warner should guide many Fantasy teams to success during the playoffs. Expect fine numbers from him the rest of the way.

Rich Gannon, QB OAK - Team Chick Updated 12/21/01
Gannon has been a top-flight Fantasy QB this year. He will be a key player on many title teams, and should never be benched.

Randy Moss, WR MIN - Team Chick Updated 12/21/01
Moss started off slow this season but has once again been one of the best wideouts. Don't hesitate to start him during your playoff run.

Marvin Minnis, WR KC - Free Agent Updated 12/21/01
Minnis hasn't done much to help Fantasy owners this year. Don't use him during the remaining weeks of the NFL season.

Michael Westbrook
, WR WAS - C-Dawg's Boyz Updated 12/21/01
Westbrook has been inconsistent this season as a Fantasy player. He will be a good No. 2 at best during your playoffs.

Rod Gardner, WR WAS - Houston Big Ballers Updated 12/21/01
Gardner has been very inconsistent this season. Unless you play in a deeper league, starting Gardner isn't advisable.

Tony Richardson, RB KC - Team Chick Updated 12/21/01

Richardson hasn't been a consistent scoring threat this year. Don't use him during the Fantasy playoffs.

Tony Gonzalez, TE KC - Grid Iron Goons Updated 12/21/01
Gonzalez hasn't played as well as expected this year. Still, he is too talented to bench during the Fantasy playoffs.

Brett Favre, QB GB - Dont Mess Updated 12/21/01
Favre has been one of the best QBs this season. Count on him to help lead your team to Fantasy glory.

Trent Green, QB KC - Blue Balls Updated 12/21/01
Green has been an inconsistent Fantasy QB this year. He is a risky start during the rest of the season.

Bill Schroeder, WR GB - Grid Iron Goons Updated 12/21/01
Schroeder has had a solid season. Look for him to be a reliable No. 2 wideout during your postseason.

More Updates

Copyright 2001 Commissioner.COM Inc and SportsLine.com Inc.
Your site can be reached from http://fantasy.sportsline.com

FB10SP


Dear Don:

We are fine tuning the methodology for our hourly indexes in order to
clarify our regional definitions. I know that you offered some valuable
feedback in the past to Bobette Riner and wanted to solicit your input now
as well.

In the draft (attached) we have classified trades solely based on their
source and sink. In so doing, we have removed references to power moving
"into or through" hubs.

In drawing regional boundaries, we have generally relied on the NERC
regions, although we continue to offer two indexes for ECAR (AEP/Northern
ECAR and Cinergy/Southern ECAR). We also are retaining the Entergy/SPP
index, based on Entergy's  intention to join SPP's proposed Regional
Transmission Organization.

The most significant other changes are:

-- ComEd/MAIN: Trades sourcing from, or sinking in, Ameren's control area,
would be included; title may change to "MAIN"

-- TVA/SERC: Virginia would be included; as previously planned, the name
changes to "SERC"

-- ERCOT: power moving out of ERCOT can be included in the index

I will attempt to reach you via phone next week to discuss these proposed
changes. We are particularly interested in how these changes may impact use
of the indexes in financial trading, quantitative analysis, risk management,
deal structuring, etc.

Feel free to pass this along to any of your colleagues for their input and
to jot any immediate thoughts to me in an e-mail.

We appreciate your input.

Regards,

RICH HEIDORN JR.
General Manager
TradersNews Energy
170 Pheasant Run, Suite 200
Newtown, PA  18940
rich.heidorn@ipgdirect.com
(T) 215-504-4288 ext. 203
(F) 215-504-5598

 - All Hub Methodology (Rev. 7-01).doc


you are in nyc?  no your not.  don't set me up with the dirty talker, i am
afraid she would embarass me.


In the public meeting today, the Commissioners approved RTO status for Grid
South, RT01-74 with certain conditions imposed. The conditions are that Grid
South continue to expand with additional members; Santee Cooper must be
included in the Grid South RTO and denies Grid South,s proposed veto rights
(must modify to ensure selection of board members represents more
participation by stakeholders) ) must maintain its independence; and orders
Grid South to resurrect original list of board candidates for another review.

FERC rejected Southern Company,s application, RT01-77, for RTO status finding
that the conditions of Order No. 2000 have not been met. The application is
rejected as being too inclusive. Chair Hebert stated that single company RTO
will not be accepted and are not the future. FERC wants to see good regional
member participation.

Commissioner Massey concurs on Grid South order; dissents in part in Southern
Company order, (expressed dismay over pricing issues finding that since the
application has been rejected, there is no reason to address pricing issues
in rejection).

The Commission discussed the order, EL 01-47, for relief to the California
and western state markets. The order announces certain action to be taken to
increase supply and reduce demand. As stated, the actions are:  1) require
California ISO and transmission owners to file grid enhancements that can be
achieved in short-term; 2) extends and broadens temporary  waivers of
operating and efficiency standards and fuel use requirements for QFs; 3)
waives prior notice requirements and grants market-based rate authority for
wholesale power sales; 4) authorizes retail/wholesale customers to reduce
consumption to resell their load reduction at wholesale at market-based
rates; 5) announces staff conference this Spring to discuss hydro-licensees,
resource agencies the possibility of increased generation consistent with
environmental protection. Addtionally, the order seeks comments by March 30,
1) rate incentives for electric transmission and gas facilities that provide
additional capacity in the short term; 2) use of interconnect authority
(Section 210.d of FPA) to help alleviate impediments to additional supply; 3)
waiving natural gas blanket certificate regulations to increase the dollar
limits for facilities under automatic authorization and prior notice
authorization; 4) offering blanket certificates for construction for
acquisition of portable compressor stations to enhance pipeline capacity to
California; 5) allowing for greater flexibility that license hydroelectric
projects to increase generation while protecting environmental resources.

FERC Commissioners intend to meet with Western state commissioners and other
regulators to discuss price volatility and other FERC related issues that
have recently been identified by the western governors. This will be a
one-day conference.


This one is for electric, I'll do the same for gas.

Thanks,
Elizabeth


You mean shouldn't be together - good point

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Forster, David
Sent:	Wednesday, January 02, 2002 8:30 AM
To:	Kitchen, Louise
Subject:	Delisting

Has anyone given any thought to the potential Enron NYSE delisting date relative to the date when the NETCo deal might be announced?

I think there might be some "spin" implications.

Dave


Your numbers amount to a adjustment of (1,746,675), were the total 2nd order from Jun 29 was (1,891,851), now I understand that I would receive a some negative 2nd order to explain some of this difference I just thought that (145,176) difference (i.e. (1,891,851-1,746675) which should be the true 2nd order) was a bit high.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Postlethwaite, John
Sent:	Tuesday, July 17, 2001 5:58 PM
To:	Punja, Karim; Zufferli, John
Cc:	Reeves, Kathy; Dupuy, Mark
Subject:	p/l adj due to option liquidations

I wanted to update you on what we have found regarding the liquidations for the financial options and the 2nd order. The problem began at the end of June when coding in enpower was changed for how the delta was reported for put options only. This change to the delta did not carry through to the liquidation values for and as a result the options were liquidating showing a loss instead of a gain. This resulted in large losses in 2nd order because the p/l that could not be explained due to the incorrect liquidations was placed there. The IT group is working to fix the problem which should be done in the next day or two. Until then, Karim and myself will manually reflect the correct liquidations and p/l in the DPR until Enpower is fixed going forward starting with July 18th p/l.

Karim and I have figured the p/l adjustment that needs to be made for July and the last day of June. The total adjustment is $1,746,675 as follows:

July = $1,529,869 (July 1 - 17)
June 29th = $216,806

The July adj was captured on July 17th p/l. The June adjustment needs to be captured as PMA adjustment. As result of the DPR being incorrect for June against the financial liquidations report, the liq rec should be out of balance by at least the adjustment noted above. An FYI for accounting, the financial liquidations report is reporting the correct liquidations numbers for any financial put options!!! The problem lies within the Enpower portcalc not the Financial liq report and that is why the lic rec should be out of balance.

John


Greg,

Listed below is a brief outline of some of the key items that I turned over
to McMahon.  I didn't attempt to put down anything but a reference point but
he has the files and we went through every point.  We didn't spend a lot of
time on the international activities because a great deal of it might not be
part of the group after project Summer.  He attended my (his) Monday staff
meeting and he got a flavor of the group and what everyone does.  This is
going to be primarily Philippe's meeting now but he is going to attend to
provide needed commercial balance and if he does, I believe that is all the
time he has to spend on that side of the business.

I hope you are having a successful trip.

Mike

Outstanding and Priority Items

International/other business unit activities
? Japan
? Korea
? S America
? Europe
? Calme
? EE&CC
? GPG
? India
? EES

Staff Meetings
? Monday lunch
? Video calls - Tuesdays:  Sao Paulo ) 9:30, London ) 10:00,  Aust. ) 5:00

i2
? Paveto/Wasaff

HR
? Recruiting
? Robert Jones
? Compensation  issues

Investments
? Fitz/Sommer/Horn

Infrastructure
? Windows 2000
? Lotus notes/exchange
? Other projects

Speaking commitments
? Aug 10th )A/A program
? Sept 21st  ) Economist ) Laguna, CA
? Sept 26th ) Rice Univ.
? Oct 3rd ) Economist ) Atlanta, GA

Financial structure/accounting
? RCs and budgets
? Metrics/radar screens
? Shared resources

Enron.com
? Paveto/Palmer

Management/Strategic planning

Project Summer

IT project resource review

PRC/reviews


FYI.  Just learned that California's key small consumer group, TURN, will be
sending a letter to the PUC saying that it would be a violation of due
process to issue on Thursday the sorts of orders the PUC is comtemplating
without first giving folks a chance to comment.


Note:  Other-Hotline


-----Original Message-----
From: 	"J&J Zufferli" <jzufferli@home.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Wednesday, June 13, 2001 8:43 AM
To:	Zufferli, John
Subject:	Fw: flood pictures

Herer are some more.  look at hwy 59 right by our house!!!! love you - jess
----- Original Message -----
From: "marilee" <witless@telusplanet.net>
To: "J&J Zufferli" <jzufferli@home.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 8:30 AM
Subject: Fw: flood pictures

> amazingly unbelievably astounding!!!
>

 - FLOOD1.jpg
 - flood2.jpg
 - flood3.jpg
 - flood4.jpg
 - flood5.jpg