---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 06/23/2000 03:06
PM ---------------------------

Chris Germany
06/23/2000 02:35 PM
To: Beverly Beaty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victoria
Versen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Molly Johnson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alvin
Thompson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Angie Zeman/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cindy
Vachuska/HOU/ECT@ECT, Clarissa Garcia/HOU/ECT@ECT,
pvillag@columbiaenergy.com, Scott Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Judy
Townsend/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan Junek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dick Jenkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robin
Barbe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Maureen Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Hendrickson/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Sarah Mulholland/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda H Fletcher/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alicia
Perkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Crystal Hyde/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Oliver/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: New and Exciting National Fuel Deal

We have a new Park & Loan / Storage deal on National Fuel effective
6/23/2000.  National Fuel transferred 1,000,000 dth from our parking contract
to our brand new firm storage contract.  We are now long FSS and short PALS.

FSS
 We have the rights to withdraw on a firm basis up to 33,333 dth per day.
However, we need to call and get permission to withdraw more than 33,333 dth
on any given day.  Also, the withdrawal takes place at an interconnect, like
Trco-Leidy.  We do not have to ship the gas on Nat Fuel.

IAS
We give Nat Fuel the gas back on an IT basis via our IAS agreement (Nat Fuel
is still setting up the contracts).  We can give Nat Fuel the gas back at any
point we wish.  We do not have to pay back the gas at the same point we
withdraw on the FSS.  And we can pay back the gas before we withdraw it.

COST
What we will probably do most of the time is take the FSS into Trco at Leidy
and payback the IAS agreement at Niagara and Leidy.  ENA will pay Nat Fuel
1,000,000 dth x ($.125 / 3 months) or $41,666.67 per month for June, July,
and August.  This deal is over on Aug 31st.  I just entered the demand charge
on my Market East demand charge sheet.  I do not have any deals set up in
Sitara.  I need to see the contracts from Nat Fuel first.  I will keep track
of the balances on an Excel worksheet.  All commodity cost and fuel is
capured in the $.125 demand charge.  Beavy and I will make sure the payback
and withdrawal tickets are balanced in Sitara once we start flowing gas on
this deal.  If we payback 60,000 dth next week and we do not have any
withdrawals, then I will show a 60,000 dth withdrawal on 8/31/2000 just to
keep the tickets balanced.

Payback Techniques
Under the expert eye of the wonderfull, superfantastic, all-around great guy,
Dick Jenkins, I've come up with some options on paying back the gas.

Niagara - only works when Niagara is open.  Nat Fuel has been very close to
capacity this week.  However, we should always see what Martin can do with
the gas if it gets backed up into TCPL.  OR if Niagara is constrained, we can
ship the gas on our firm Nat Fuel contract then pay it back to Nat Fuel, at
today's prices that cost about $.105

Wadd - take our Tenn Z6 length into CNG via Iroq, ship it to Trco- Leidy, and
payback the gas at Leidy.  At today's prices, that cost about  $.055,
assuming we get to roll over all of our CNG fuel waivers.

Tenn -   we just need to see what type of IT rate Dan can get to ship the
Gulf to Tenn Z4 (Ellisburgh).  We can also move the Dracutt to Nat Fuel on
segmented capacity for $.145 or  move Wright to Nat Fuel for $.11.  We cannot
use the Net 284 contract on any of the Tenn / Nat Fuel interconnects.

Let me know if you have any questons.


---------------------- Forwarded by Binh Pham/HOU/ECT on 04/26/2000 10:04 AM
---------------------------

Hang Bui
04/26/2000 09:49 AM
To: "Le, Hien" <HLe@cei-crescent.com>, Binh Pham/HOU/ECT@ECT, tbui@uh.edu
cc:
Subject: FW: Fw: cuckoo clock

---------------------- Forwarded by Hang Bui/HOU/ECT on 04/26/2000 09:49 AM
---------------------------
To: Hang Bui@ect, Misti Day@ECT, Daniel Falcone@ENRON,
Subject: FW: Fw: cuckoo clock

Subject: FWD: Fw: cuckoo clock

The other night I was invited out for a night with the "boys".  I told my
wife that i would be home by midnight...promise!  Well, the hours passed and
the beer was going down way too easy.  At around 3 A.M., drunk as a skunk, I
headed home.  Just as I got in the door, the cuckoo clock in the hall
started up, and cuckooed 3 times.  Quickly, I realized she'd probably wake
up, so I cuckooed another 9 times.  I was really proud of myself, having a
quick, witty solution, even when smashed, to escape a possible conflict.
Next morning my wife asked me what time I got in and I told her 12 o'clock.
She didn't seem disturbed at all.  Whew!  Got away with that one!  She then
told me that we needed a new cuckoo clock.  When I asked her why she said
"Well, it cuckooed 3 times, then said "oh fuck", cuckooed 4 more times,
cleared it's throat, cuckooed another 3 times, giggled, cuckooed twice more,
and then farted.


FYI

-----Original Message-----
From: Williams, Bill [mailto:Bill.Williams@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2001 6:53 PM
To: Gilbert, Jim
Cc: Rasmussen, Dale; Thompson, Peter J.
Subject: RE: LV Cogen Turbine Contracts

Jim.  Lisa's point is valid.  It was confusing to get everything other
than technical information for the b/o contract coordinated. "Others"
had that responsibility.  Be that as it may, her questions set before
you in her e mail need to be answered.  Peter Thompson should get
responses to those questions to coordinate and amend into the GE B/O
contract, as should Lisa Bills.

Her "general comments"  that follow below are comments that Peter
Thompson can incorporate now. I'm not sure if that's clear to everyone.
But that is the case (I called Lisa to ask).  And, I'd also like to
propose that any revision to the B/O contract going forward be clearly
defined and tracked with a rev number and date/time so that no confusion
exists as to what version is going around.  I would also suggest that
each revision carry a description of what was added and where the add or
change originated.  I apologize if it sounds like I'm telling people how
to do their job, but we cannot take any more delay to at least having
this document shelf - ready to sign when the trigger gets pulled.

Cheery Bye

Bill W.

>  -----Original Message-----
> From:  Gilbert, Jim
> Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2001 3:06 PM
> To: Bills, Lisa
> Cc: Engeldorf, Roseann; Tweed, Sheila; Clark, Catherine; Kerrigan,
> Brian; Mann, Kay; Rasmussen, Dale; Bill Williams/PDX/ECT@ENRON
> Subject: LV Cogen Turbine Contracts
>
> Lisa:
>
> I have been the lead originator for LVC since we purchased the asset
> in August of 1999.  Given all that we are trying to accomplish to
> achieve a successful exit strategy with this asset, I have relied  on
> people like Bill Williams and his technical team to move this document
> and other similar efforts forward.  Having Bill's support on this
> document has allowed me to focus my efforts on closing the
> negotiations on our tolling agreement required to support the LVCII
> expansion.
>
> After my review of this agreement, along with in put from Bill
> Williams and Dale Rasmussen,  I will confirm back to you that your
> comments are appropriately reflected in the turbine contract to obtain
> signed off from ENA Finance.
>
> I'm currently in Denver, please contact me on my cell phone should you
> have any questions.
>
> Thank you,
> Jim
>
> Cell Ph: 503-464-1206
>
>
>
> ---------------------- Forwarded by Jim Gilbert/PDX/ECT on 05/02/2001
> 02:37 PM ---------------------------
> From: Lisa Bills/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/02/2001 03:19 PM CDT
> To:
> Williams@/O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=NOTESADDR/CN=2C4A79E9-5692F67
> A-8625654B-4F9C03@EX@enronXgate, Stephen Thome/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim
> Gilbert/PDX/ECT@ECT, pthompson@akllp.com@SMTP@enronXgate, Dale
> Rasmussen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ed Clark/PDX/ECT@ECT
> cc: Roseann Engeldorf/ENRON@enronXgate, Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT,
> Catherine Clark/ENRON@enronXgate, Brian Kerrigan/ENRON@enronXgate, Kay
> Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
> Subject: LV Cogen Turbine Contract
>
> Rose and I have reviewed the contract Peter sent to us yesterday - the
> draft distributed on April 24.  Rose has already provided our comments
> to Peter on the Override Letter which accompanies the contract.  I
> have one big issue which the lawyers can't answer as it is a business
> decision.  No one seems sure if Bill is the acting originator for this
> contract or not.  I leave it up to the LV Cogen Origination team to
> decide.  However, until I receive word back from the appropriate
> person and see my changes reflected in the turbine contract, Finance
> has not signed off on this agreement so it cannot be executed on
> E-Next's behalf.
>
> What is the per UNIT turbine purchase amount?  The Purchase Amount is
> a remaining total balance outstanding.  In 6.1.2 Payment Schedule, the
> payment amount is a lump sum.  However, in the 2nd para. of 5.4
> Cancellation and in 6.1.3 Retention Letter(s) of Credit for example,
> each UNIT is discussed.  There needs to be an allocation of the
> Purchase Amount and Payment Amount on a per turbine basis so Finance
> can track these costs as such in case a change order is made to only
> one turbine or if a turbine is removed from E-Next prior to all
> turbines being removed.  Also, how does anyone know for 6.1.3 when the
> last $788,500 per Turbine is supposed to be paid so we can retain it?
>
>
> Also, I would appreciate receiving a clarification of why we don't
> define the Purchase Amount as the total and not just the balance
> remaining.  It could create discrepancies in the document and for
> anybody reading the document trying to understand how much each
> turbine costs.  E-Next has already made the approx $10mm payments made
> to-date.  However, if someone were to pick up the document to find out
> how much they could buy the turbines for, it would appear to be
> $53.6mm not the Maximum Liability Amount of $63.1mm.  2nd para of 5.4
> refers to the portion of the Purchase Amount to be adjusted upon
> cancellation.  However, Exhibit I Cancellation refers to the Unit
> Liability Amount as the basis for calculation - this seems
> inconsistent to me.
>
>
> Now for the general comments:
>
> Section 1.69 and 1.70 need to change places to be alphabetically
> correct.
>
> 6.1.2 calls for a payment to be made on April 21, 2001.  Exhibit I
> Cancellation also has a line for cancellation between March 21 and
> April 20, 2001.  This will need to be amended as this payment wasn't
> made given no contract execution yet.  As everyone knows also, E-Next
> must be the party to make this payment to insure the correct
> accounting treatment.
>
> 6.5 is another place where a per Unit price is discussed for increases
> or decreases.  How is this possible with an aggregate Purchase Amount?
>
> In all Notice sections please delete "c/o Las Vegas Cogeneration II,
> L.L.C."  This project is not associated with the E-Next financing.
>
> 10.2.3.1 Please underline "Optional Delivery Point"
>
> 10.12.2  Please delete the " ' " in "it's" after the proviso.
>
> 10.15  The timing of 120 days for delivery of serial numbers herein is
> inconsistent with the bracketed 5 months in 10.2.1 and Exhibit P.
> Please conform all to the same time frame.
>
> Has David Marshall reviewed all the insurance provisions of this
> document.  While a standard turbine contract, there have been some
> recent modifications/views from our insurance providers.
>
> I look forward to hearing back from the deal team and reviewing the
> next round of documents.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


fine with me and I'm waiting to hear from Susan

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	George, Robert H.
Sent:	Friday, February 01, 2002 3:09 PM
To:	Musch, Susan; Shackleton, Sara
Subject:	RE: RMT

Can we move it to 4:00 or 4:30 as my meeting is still in progress.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Musch, Susan
Sent:	Friday, February 01, 2002 1:43 PM
To:	Shackleton, Sara; George, Robert H.
Subject:	RE: RMT

Works for me.

Susan

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shackleton, Sara
Sent:	Friday, February 01, 2002 12:56 PM
To:	Musch, Susan; George, Robert H.
Subject:	RE: RMT

let me know if 3:30 works for you guys; we can meet in 3801a (my office).

thanks.  Sara

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Musch, Susan
Sent:	Friday, February 01, 2002 10:29 AM
To:	Shackleton, Sara
Subject:	RMT

Sara,

When you like to meet on RMT today?  My morning is booked up, but the afternoon is pretty open.

Best regards,
Susan


Monica, per our discussion.  I look forward to working with you.

Regards,
Sherri Sera
Assistant to Jeff Skilling
713.853.5984
713.646.8381 (fax)
sherri.sera@enron.com


Claire:
Here is the information for the Calpine project that we talked about
yesterday and that Jim Simpson sent you the e-mail about.

Hypothetical 4 LM 6000 Peaking Project in Eastern PJM
VOM:  $2.23
H.R. 10,5000
Gas Curve: Transco Zone 6
Power Curve: East Hub Curve in PJM
Commercial Operations Date: 6/1/01

We are looking for a 3 and 5 year capacity number ($/kw-mo.) one number for
each time period.  Please let me know if you need any more information
regarding the project.  Thanks for your help.
Ben


Legal is requesting some information for the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act filing related to the merger by the end of the day tomorrow.  Please see below.  I have listed the description of the codes below.  The information is requested for the year 2000.  Please provide a list of states in which Enron subsidiaries (entities incorporated in the U.S. only) which earned revenues in 2000 (1) have customers, (2) conduct their operations, or (3) have physical office locations (as specified below) for the following NAICS codes only.  The revenues should include intercompany revenues.

I am attaching a file which was compiled a few months ago, containing the largest Enron companies earning revenues in 2000 and their respective NAICS codes.  This is not all-inclusive, but is a good start.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks,
Sal
3-6020

221122	Electric Power Distribution
221210	Natural Gas Distribution
421520	Coal and Other Mineral and Ore Wholesalers
422710	Petroleum Bulk Stations and Terminals
513330	Telecommunications Resellers
523130	Commodity Contracts Dealing

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Essig, Carol
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 2:39 PM
To:	Dominguez, Sal
Subject:	HSR info needed

Sal,

Thanks in advance for your kind assistance.

Per our phone conversation, can you please provide me with the states in which Enron Corp.'s subsidiaries (of which it owns 50% or more) conduct operations for the following NAICS codes:

	221122	(states in which operations are conducted)
	221210  (states in which operations are conducted)
	421520	(states in which the customers are located)
	422710  (states in which the customers are located)
	513330	(states in which operations are conducted)
	523130	(states in which the physical offices are located)

Sal,
Also, please provide the 1997 and 2000 revenue data for Portland General by NAICS code.
I will contact Valerie and /or Kirk at Portland General to get the list of subs. info for PGE.

I know that his is short notice, but I have just been given the information and has made this request immediately to you.  Unfortunately, they have requested to have it by the end of the day tomorrow (11/27).  They will let me know if they can give additional time.  If you should have any questions, please let me know.

Carol
X37014


Who is this girl pretending to be Susan?

Susan M Scott
07/27/2000 12:23 PM
To: Ted Noble/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Alternative to a .com luau

Look at you trying to bring me out of my shell.  I don't know if I'm really
ready though to meet so many new people.  Remember...I am a shy, retiring
wall-flower.


Enron is in the process of re-negotiating our contract with Dow Jones
Interactive and we need to know if you are currently
accessing this data.  In the near future there will be a cost associated with
this information and you are currently listed as
having a license.

Please click on the below link and let us know if you need continued access
to this service.

http://nahou-webcl1.corp.enron.com/inquisite/DJI/DJI.html

Thank You,
Market Data


Bronco is on the sofa upstairs.

"Neil Mann" <nmann@erac.com> on 02/20/2001 11:40:26 AM
Please respond to <nmann@erac.com>
To: "C. Kay Mann (E-mail)" <Kay.Mann@Enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Stuff

Good morning!
Boy, it's been non stop since I walked in. Someone broke into Brett's and
Stephen's offices last night. They trashed a lot of offices and stole small
amounts of cash from some employees desks. Nothing really big taken. There
were several laptops out and they found the keys to several cars but left
all of it alone. One of the cars was Nancy Bs new suburban. Doesn't make
sense...

Michael is very concerned about Bronco and that Charlotte won't be able to
find him tonight when they get home.  He is really taken with Bronco...

Gota go.

NM


Please call in @ 1330 Pacific. Call In Number (877) 670-4111  Passcode
246870.


Chris,
I have arranged for Janie and Patti to be available for a conference call at 11:30 CDT, 9:30 PDT.  I will get Patti and Janie on the phone and then call you.  Let me know if you have a conflict.

Thanks,

Kim


Sorry about the confusion.  Fran Mayes will be sending a memo out in the next
day or so reflecting the times of the PRC.  In order to accommodate Dave's
meeting with all you and to include Mark Frevert we had to move the time of
the PRC from 8:00 am to 11:00 am.  The ONLY thing changed was the time,
the date and place remain the same.

Again, I am sorry for the confusion and I hope this helps.  If you have any
question, please feel free to call me.

Thanks,

Kay


---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Neal/HOU/ECT on 06/14/2000 04:22 PM
---------------------------

Christa Winfrey
06/09/2000 02:08 PM
To: Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sandra F Brawner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank
Ermis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kate Fraser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Grigsby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Keith
Holst/HOU/ECT@ect, Peter F Keavey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul T Lucci/DEN/ECT@Enron,
Thomas A Martin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Larry May/Corp/Enron@Enron, Greg
McClendon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brad McKay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carey M Metz/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eva Pao/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim Schwieger/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fletcher J Sturm/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patricia
Tlapek/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kristin Walsh/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael E
Moscoso/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Gas Position Report - Executive Reports Viewer

The Gas Position Report is housed in the Executive Reports Viewer.  In order
for you to view this report, the viewer must be installed on your computer.
Attached is a memo providing instructions on how to install and use the
viewer.

If you have any questions, or problems with installation, please contact me
at ext. 3-9307.

Thank you,

Christa Winfrey
ENA Competitive Analysis & Business Controls


Hello:
It is the Blue Men Group.  Two friends highly recommend it.  It's in the
Astor Theatre on Lafayette in the Village.
43rd should be good.  I think you woul dhave had more flavor in Harlem though

"Jennifer White" <jenwhite7@zdnetonebox.com> on 11/21/2000 01:54:16 PM
To: john.arnold@enron.com
cc:
Subject: NY

I've been tasked with getting tickets to a show.  Was it 'Blue Men Group'
that you recommended we see?  And Michelle lives on W43rd, so it's not
as bad as you thought.

___________________________________________________________________
To get your own FREE ZDNet Onebox - FREE voicemail, email, and fax,
all in one place - sign up today at http://www.zdnetonebox.com


I've just spoken with Christian Yoder, who said he's got the confirmation
letters for these deals on his desk. He's also planning to call you to
discuss this further - these deals and several others entered as part of an
EES acquisition will all be confirmed differently than usual. I'm not
completely clear on the subject, so I'm going to defer to Christian's legal
expertise.

But if you have any other questions, please let me know. I can certainly sit
down with Christian and maybe we can all conference call on the subject.

Thanks,
Kate

	From:  Sharen Cason                           01/02/2001 08:38 AM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Kimberly Hundl/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Avista deals

There are two deals for Avista the are marked not to be confirmed.  Can you
check into these, and if they are not to be confirmed, put a little note as
to why or who said not to confirm them, so 6 months from now when someone
says "Why didn't you confirm this deal!"  I'll have something to jog my
memory.  (Because I will have slept between now and then!)

Deal Numbers #487050 and 487054

Thanks!


Charles Bradley & Sally Scott
10802 Jaycreek
Houston, TX 77070

I'll try giving you a call tonight just to catch up and see how things are going.  Were you planning on going walking?

Sue

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Jennifer Bowles" <jkbowles@hotmail.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Jennifer+20Bowles+22+20+3Cjkbowles+40hotmail+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Monday, August 13, 2001 11:30 AM
To:	sscott5@enron.com
Subject:	Sooo....

... KOREA!?!?!  Eh?  Well, no can say your life isn't exciting!  Wow, I
can't wait to hear about it!

I got your message Saturday.  I was in Austin and Matt and I were actually
registering at Breed & Co. when you called... sorry I missed you!

No worries about the music... we just need to get together soon!  AND, no
worries about the bachelorette party... I would definitely say Korea's
slightly more enticing! :o)

When you have a minute could I get your dad's full name and your parent's
address?

Thanks friend -- I HOPE to hear from you soon!

Love,

Jen

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp


Gene,

I have a methodology that gives me the answer with 3 uses of the balance 50% of the time but requires 4 uses of the balance the other 50% of the time.
Are you sure this can be done????

For my first use of the scales, I place a total of 6 balls on the scales (3 on each side). If they balance, then none of the six balls on the scales is the odd ball. If they do not balance, then none of the six balls that were left off of the scales is the odd ball. Thus, I have reduced the possible suspects to 6 after one use of the scales.

Is this the right starting point???

Second, I place three balls that have been eliminated as suspects on one side of the scales and three balls that are still possibles on the other. Two outcomes:

1. If the scales do not balance, I know that one of the three suspects on the scales is the odd ball and I know whether it is heavier or lighter than the others. I can determine which is the odd ball on the third use of the scales by placing only one remaining suspect on each side of the scales. If they balance, then the suspect left off is the odd ball. If they do not balance, I know which one is odd because I already know whether the odd ball is heavier or lighter.

2. If the scales balance on my second use of the scales, then I have three remaining suspects (the balls left off the scales) but do not know whether the odd ball is heavier or lighter. I cannot figure out how to determine both the heavier/lighter question plus identify the odd ball in just one more use of the scales. I need two more uses.

Am I close at all????

I hope that you had a good trip back. Stay in touch.

Paul


In a couple of years, I may not be employed... but I am sorry to hear that you cannot make it..

I am probably going to slip out on friday and catch 9 holes and then probably on sunday.. I a go, i will let you know so you can watch for me on TV.

See ya. BT

-----Original Message-----
From: Jacy Whyte [mailto:JacyWhyte@andrewagencies.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 3:18 PM
To: Tycholiz, Barry
Subject: Weekend

I guess I can't make it as I sit here in windy/wet/cold weather. I just
checked the internet and Weir is tied for 2nd. Maybe if it returns in a
couple years I will be able to come down. I'll look for you this weekend.
Will you be the guy in cut off sweats and a muscle shirt (Dauphin golf
course dress code)?

Jacy


Start Date: 1/27/02; HourAhead hour: 15;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002012715.txt


Alright, you too!

Val

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark.Guzman@enron.com [mailto:Mark.Guzman@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, October 06, 2000 9:16 AM
To: Valerie Dewille
Subject: RE:

Well, have a great weekend and I will give you a call when I get back!


George has Oyster Creek coming back Nov. 25. We have it coming back Nov. 17
on our sheet. Let's assume George's info. is the best.

Thanx,

Chris
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Dorland/HOU/ECT on 11/13/2000 11:24
AM ---------------------------

George Hopley
11/13/2000 10:06 AM
To: Doug Gilbert-Smith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joe Quenet/NA/Enron@Enron, Tom
May/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mike Carson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jeff
King/Corp/Enron@Enron, Robert Benson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Chris
Dorland/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matt Lorenz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laura Podurgiel/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Robert Stalford/NA/Enron@Enron, Narsimha Misra/NA/Enron@Enron, Gautam
Gupta/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul J Broderick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul D
Thomas/NA/Enron@Enron, Peter Makkai/NA/Enron@Enron, Eric
Saibi/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Grace Kim/NA/Enron@Enron, Ricardo
Perez/NA/Enron@Enron, Juan Padron/NA/Enron@Enron, Edward D
Baughman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rika Imai/NA/Enron@Enron, Clint Dean/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: 4 Month Rolling Forecast

---------------------- Forwarded by George Hopley/HOU/ECT on 11/13/2000 11:02
AM ---------------------------

HGP Inc <hgpbus@home.com> on 11/13/2000 10:43:58 AM
To: Kevin.M.Presto@enron.com, George.Hopley@enron.com,
Mark.Dana.Davis@enron.com, FSturm@enron.com, Rogers.Herndon@enron.com
cc:
Subject: 4 Month Rolling Forecast

Attached are the two files for this week's update of the Four Month
Rolling Forecast.  I am sending this to you a day earlier than normal
because I will be attending the Cook restart meeting tomorrow.

Dana - Still checking on Seabrook.  Waiting for return calls.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Dan
 - 001113 update.doc
 - 001113 update.xls


-----Original Message-----
From: Joor, William E., III
Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2000 11:29 AM
To: Dilg, Joe
Subject: FW: NoCal March 20 Draft - Natural Gas Pipelines and
Distribution

William E. Joor III
Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.
3600 First City Tower
1001 Fannin
Houston, Texas  77002-6760
Tel:  713-758-2582
Fax:  713-615-5201
wjoor@velaw.com

 +++++++++++++++++++++++
 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
 +++++++++++++++++++++++
 The information in this email may be confidential and/or
privileged. This email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual
or organization named above. If you are not the intended recipient or an
authorized representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any review, dissemination or copying of this email and its
attachments, if any, or the information contained herein is prohibited.
If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the
sender by return email and delete this email from your system. Thank You

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Linn Miller [mailto:Michael.Linn.Miller@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, March 20, 2000 6:44 PM
To: J Mark Metts; Taylor, Mitchell (Enron); Amit Walia; Ceci Torn;
fstable@ei.enron.com; Sayre, C. Frank (Enron); fleite@enron.com; Lewis,
Jim C. (Enron); Young, Randy (Enron); Christodoulou, Diomendes (Enron)
Cc: Joor, William E., III; Alastair.maxwell@msdw.com;
Martin.arias@msdw.com; ramzi.nassar@msdw.com
Subject: NoCal March 20 Draft - Natural Gas Pipelines and Distribution

As previously indicated.

MLM
---------------------- Forwarded by Michael Linn Miller/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
03/20/2000 06:48 PM ---------------------------

Ramzi.Nassar@msdw.com on 03/20/2000 03:28:23 PM

To:   Michael.l.miller@enron.com
cc:

Subject:  NoCal March 20 Draft - Natural Gas Pipelines and Distribution

(See attached file: #143900 v1 - Natural Gas Pipes (Promigas).doc)(See
attached
file: #143900 v1 - Natural Gas Pipes (Centragas).doc)

(See attached file: #143900 v1 - Natural Gas Pipes (Promigas).doc)
(See attached file: #143900 v1 - Natural Gas Pipes (Centragas).doc)

 - #143900 v1 - Natural Gas Pipes (Promigas).doc
 - #143900 v1 - Natural Gas Pipes (Centragas).doc


Please view the summary tab on each worksheet for the final figures.

If you have any questions/concerns or need additional information, please let
me know.

Chris
503-464-8219

Mary Hain
09/08/2000 06:09 PM
To: Brian.Harrington@ferc.fed.us, michelle.veloso@ferc.fed.us
cc: Christi Nicolay, Bill Williams/PDX/ECT@ECT (bcc: Chris Stokley/HOU/ECT)
Subject: Enron Data Responses for FERC's Bulk Power Investigation

Attached find Enron Power Marketing, Inc., and Enron Energy Services'
responses to the Staff's data requests in the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission's Bulk Power Investigation.  These responses assumes that you sent
separate data requests to Enron Wind, so they do not include that
information.  The answers also assume you are requesting this information for
California (and therefore the Western interconnect) only.  Please let me know
if these assumptions are incorrect.

If you were requesting Eastern Interconnect information you need to contact
Chrisit Nicolay at the above E-mail address.  Enron requests confidential
treatment of response numbers 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8 pursuant to 18 C.F.R. Section
388.112.  Due to the short turn around time for these requests we were unable
to respond to question 8 and to provide the Unit Identifier requested in
question 4.  We hope to be able to provide this information on Monday.
Please call me with any questions at (503) 464-8862.  I will be traveling on
Monday, so if you call then, call my cell phone at 503 807-0929.


FYI

Vince
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/10/2001
03:04 PM ---------------------------

Vasant Shanbhogue
04/10/2001 12:44 PM
To: Norma Villarreal/HOU/ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Sevil Yaman

Hi Norma,

 Sevil's primary project has been the Generation Bidding Analysis for the
East Power Desk.  She worked closely with the Power Fundamentals group and
the IT group in collecting and organizing the data, and then developing the
analysis.  Sha has focused on the PJM area and plans to expand the analysis
to other regions in the East.
 Sevil has also investigated the issue of Risk Premia in Power Prices
compared to Marginal Cost.

Vasant


Hi Mark,

Looking forward to getting this information when you get a chance.

Jane

----- Forwarded by Jane McBride/AP/Enron on 2001/01/17 09:55 -----

	Mark E Haedicke@ECT
	2001/01/17 04:24

		 To: Jane McBride/AP/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: ISDA Electronic Document Available

Jane:

I have asked Mark Taylor to coordinate with you on this matter.

Regards,

Mark

	Jane McBride@ENRON
	01/14/2001 06:55 PM

		 To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: ISDA Electronic Document Available

Dear Mark,

As per this letter from Bob Pickel, I wonder if you (assuming you are Enron's
"Primary ISDA contact") would be able to send me our Firm ID and password
when you have a chance so that I can access the online versions of the
documents.

Thanks very much and thanks for the card.  Hoping you and your family had a
happy holiday and wishing you all the best for 2001.

Jane McBride

----- Forwarded by Jane McBride/AP/Enron on 2001/01/15 09:50 -----

	"ISDA" <cgreasley@isda.org>
	2001/01/13 12:18
	Please respond to cgreasley

		 To: jane.mcbride@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: ISDA Electronic Document Available

 - cover- non pcs.doc


We would love to see all three of you.  Sounds as if you might arrive on
Friday around 5:00 or 6:00, so we will plan on dinner together.  You can see
the kitchen in progress!!  The upstairs is untouched, however, so you can
make yourselves at home.  I will let everyone know tonight, and they will all
be glad to see you.

I haven't talked with Cara since the weekend, so I didn't know that she might
change her plans.  I will try to catch her tonight.

Just let me know on the $'s.  I can send that whenever you might need it.
And I would suggest that we start a repay program after another few months as
you all get caught up on other things.  No rush.

Love, Sally


J-We bought 15,000/d from a 3rd party for 11/10 through 11/14. Please pull
from our TCO Pool #69593. Our daily forcasted noms will reflect this.
C- Should we do this at GD 10-14 rather than IF FOM?


SPEE Members,

Attached is the January Meeting Notice.

Harry Saul


When: Thursday, January 17, 2002 1:00 PM-2:00 PM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada).
Where: ECN 10C1

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Please include anyone else you feel needs to be in attendance.

Matt will call Murray's Office (503) 464-8817 at 1:00 p.m. Houston time/ 11:00 a.m. Portland time.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Lilly, Kyle R.
Sent:	Friday, September 28, 2001 3:11 PM
To:	Love, Phillip M.; Bosse, Kevin
Subject:	FW: Bin Laden Liquors - The Game

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Gonzales, Alexander R.
Sent:	Friday, September 28, 2001 3:04 PM
To:	Castillo, Michael; Lilly, Kyle R.
Subject:	FW: Bin Laden Liquors - The Game

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Veronica Olvera <volvera@heinassoc.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Veronica+20Olvera+20+3Cvolvera+40heinassoc+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Wednesday, September 26, 2001 1:48 PM
To:	Helen Villasenor; Debra Benavides; Robert. E. George (E-mail); Raul (E-mail); Leticia Graham; Papichulo (E-mail); David Million; Kathy Courtney; Juero (E-mail); Jane White; Grizelda L. Cavazos (E-mail); Evie (E-mail); Gonzales, Alexander R.; Celinda Ruiz (E-mail); Denise Hernandez (E-mail); Soto, Elizabeth; White Girl (E-mail)
Subject:	FW: Bin Laden Liquors - The Game

This is TIGHT!!!!!

-----Original Message-----
From: 	Basurto, David [mailto:David_Basurto@AIMFUNDS.COM]
Sent:	Wednesday, September 26, 2001 1:39 PM
To:	'Basurto, Robert V.'; 'Oscar.Rodriguez@dynegy.com'; Veronica Olvera;
'Mario Rodriguez (mario.rodriguez@ev1.net)'; Mata, Juan
Subject:	Bin Laden Liquors - The Game

Happy shooting!!

http://www.fieler.com/terror/


Marie,

Forgot to send this to you also.

-----Original Message-----
From: Doukas, Tom
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 10:45 AM
To: Shackleton, Sara
Subject: FW: services agreement

This is the primebroker agreement that we need to fill out for CSFB.  They are holding two trades hostage so this is a priority for us.  Please let me know if you require any further information.

Tom

-----Original Message-----
From: Keneally, Kelly [mailto:kelly.keneally@csfb.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 10:34 AM
To: Doukas, Tom
Subject: FW: services agreement

>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	Ramirez, Jonathan
> Sent:	Thursday, August 09, 2001 11:13 AM
> To:	Keneally, Kelly
> Subject:	services agreement
>
>  <<primebrokerage.pdf>>

This message is for the named person's use only.  It may contain
confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information.  No
confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.
If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all
copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the
sender.  You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute,
print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended
recipient. CREDIT SUISSE GROUP and each of its subsidiaries each reserve
the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks.  Any
views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except
where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state
them to be the views of any such entity.
Unless otherwise stated, any pricing information given in this message is
indicative only, is subject to change and does not constitute an offer to
deal at any price quoted.
Any reference to the terms of executed transactions should be treated as
preliminary only and subject to our formal written confirmation.


Start Date: 4/22/01; HourAhead hour: 9;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042209.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 9 / Preferred:  12.00 / Final:  11.98)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/22/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_ERNIE
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 9 / Preferred:  62.44 / Final:  62.41)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE3
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/22/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


Bill:
Thanks for the information.  I need to take a closer look at Janet's
language, particularly the "null and void" language to make sure that it
covers all possible events of default under the Master Agreement.  As to the
Texas law issue, our ability to get comfortable from a legal standpoint will
in large part be dictated by this issue.  Is there anyway to get more
certainty on this with the sureties?  I understand that you don't want to go
to them multiple times but this is a key issue for us.  Let me know what you
think.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com

	boldham@reliant.com
	06/04/2001 03:35 PM

		 To: carol.st.clair@enron.com
		 cc: jkgreene@reliant.com
		 Subject: Re: Update

Carol:

The attached two e-mails are in response to your inquiry of 6-1-01.  If you
have any questions, let me know.

Bill Oldham
Director, Insurance Risk Management
Reliant Energy Incorporated
Telephone No.713/207-3131
FAX No. 713/207-3251
email:    bill-oldham@reliantenergy.com
----
----- Forwarded by Bill Oldham/ADM/HouInd on 06/04/01 10:19 AM -----

                    Michael_Herrod@a
                    rs.aon.com              To:     boldham@reliant.com
                                            cc:     Dan_Burton@ars.aon.com,
John_Rathmell@ars.aon.com,
                    06/04/01 09:59          Kevin_Sparks@ars.aon.com,
Margaret_Buboltz@ars.aon.com,
                    AM                      Margaret_Gibson@ars.aon.com
                                            Subject:     Re: Update

In my opinion, the wording suggested by Janet Green should be acceptable.
We
will have to have this wording formally approved by the surety companies
prior
to issuance.  I would like to avoid approaching the sureties until all
questions
have been addressed and all changes have been made.  In regards the bonds
being
subject to Texas law, I do not see that as being a problem.  We will
address
that with the sureties along with other potential changes.

In response to previous email, neither Dan nor I know of an attorney that
would
be willing or able to write an opinion in regards the applicability of the
Appleton Law.  As discussed during the meeting, this law has nothing to do
with
the viability of an exisitng surety bond.  If a surety issued a bond that
was
later found to be in violation of Appleton, they would be fined by the
State of
New York.  It does not make the bond invalid.  MJH

----- Forwarded by Bill Oldham/ADM/HouInd on 06/04/01 07:32 AM -----

                    Janet K Greene
                                         To:     Bill
Oldham/ADM/HouInd@HouInd
                    06/03/01 05:23       cc:
                    PM                   Subject:     Re: Update(Document
link:
Bill Oldham)

What if we said:  "if the
Principal shall promptly and faithfully perform its obligations under the
Confirm, which is a part of and governed by the Master Agreement, then this
obligation shall be null and void"

With respect to her second point, what if we again said "an Event of
Default has occurred under the Confirm, which is a part of and governed by
the Master Agreement"?

I think she is trying to clarify in the language that the bond can be
called for an Event of Default under the Master Agreement, which could have
nothing to do with the Confirm - - - which is factually correct.

Janet K. Greene
Reliant Resources, Inc.
1111 Louisiana, Suite 4300
Houston, TX 77002
713-207-5732
fax: 713-207-0141
jkgreene@reliant.com

                    Bill Oldham
                                         To:     Carol.St.Clair@enron.com
                    06/01/01 09:27       cc:     Edward.Sacks@enron.com,
janet-greene@reliantenergy.com,
                    AM                   Wendy.Conwell@enron.com, Bill T
Hamilton/TTG/HouInd@HouInd, William
                                         Waller/ADM/HouInd@HouInd, Rex
Clevenger/ADM/HouInd@HouInd
                                         Subject:     Re: Update(Document
link:
Janet K Greene)

Carol:

Thankyou for the attached.  I believe the governing law for each issuing
surety will be the law where the surety is domiciled, but let me do some
checking and confirm this.  Also, will get back to you on your comments Re
the language in our recommended bond form...probably Monday or Tuesday next
week.  Thanks for your continued efforts in this matter.

Bill Oldham
Director, Insurance Risk Management
Reliant Energy Incorporated
Telephone No.713/207-3131
FAX No. 713/207-3251
email:    bill-oldham@reliantenergy.com

                    Carol.St.Clair
                    @enron.com            To:
bill-oldham@reliantenergy.com
                                          cc:
janet-greene@reliantenergy.com, Edward.Sacks@enron.com,
                    06/01/01 09:02        Wendy.Conwell@enron.com
                    AM                    Subject:     Update

Bill:
I spoke with our outside counsel yesterday and we have some more follow up
work that we need to do on our side.  One issue that may be of some
importance to us in our analysis is determining what the governing law of
the surety bond will be for each issuer, and more importantly, whether we
can have the bonds governed by Texas law.  Can you answer this for me?

Also, with respect to the form of the bond itself, as we mentioned at the
meeting, the language in the third paragraph which states that "if the
Principal shall promptly and faithfully provide the Firm energy as defined
in the Confirm, hen this obligation shall be null and void," does not work
for us.  Has anyone come up with alternative language?  Finally, with
respect to the Notice of Claim, we would like for the certification to say
something like, "an Event of Default has occurred under the Master
Agreement" rather than tie it to a specific default under the Confirmation.
Does that work for the sureties?

I look forward to hearing from you.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com


http://www.consultrci.com

************************************************************************
Dear IssueAlert Subscriber,

Visit our InfoStore to subscribe to SourceBook Weekly and get your
PowerHitters
Interviews.  Get a free synopsis of the past week's news in IssuesWatch
at:

http://www.consultrci.com/web/infostore.nsf/Products/IssuesWatch

Jane Pelz
Director of Marketing Communications
SCIENTECH, Inc.

December 18, 2000 SourceBook Weekly Issue titles are below
***********************************************************************
Utilities and Bandwidth: The Past, or the Future?
http://www.consultrci.com/web/rciweb.nsf/Web+Pages/SBEntrance.html
***********************************************************************
Alternative Energy IPOs: Hot Now, But for How Long?
http://www.consultrci.com/web/rciweb.nsf/Web+Pages/SBEntrance.html
***********************************************************************
Real-Time Metering: Can It Make a Difference in the Competitive Bottom
Line?
http://www.consultrci.com/web/rciweb.nsf/Web+Pages/SBEntrance.html
***********************************************************************
Light Amid the Darkness: Pennsylvania Viewed as Most Successful Competitive
Market
http://www.consultrci.com/web/rciweb.nsf/Web+Pages/SBEntrance.html
***********************************************************************

===============================================================
SCIENTECH IssueAlert, December 18, 2000
FERC Approves Contentious Order on California
By: Will McNamara, Director, Electric Industry Analysis
===============================================================

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) last Friday unanimously
approved a comprehensive order on ways to fix California's troubled
marketplace.
Though some, including Commissioner Curt H,bert, hoped this order would
be the final word, FERC signaled that more work has to be done to reach
market consensus on several issues, including a new market structure for
the state.

ANALYSIS: Although some ongoing and larger issues remain, this order does
bring closure to FERC's proposed ruling from last month, which had outlined
several key remedies to repair what has roundly been called a flawed system
in California. FERC previously had determined that the dysfunctional market
structure in the state had caused "unjust and unreasonable rates" for
utilities
that must purchase power on the wholesale market, and end-use customers
such as those in San Diego who no longer are protected by a rate freeze.
With a couple of important exceptions, the Commission essentially gave
a rubber stamp of approval to its proposed order that was issued on Nov.
1, after receiving input from participants throughout the energy industry.

As expected, FERC adopted its "soft" rate cap of $150/MWh. In real terms,
this means that bids above this amount cannot set the market clearing price
that is paid to other bidders for power on the wholesale market. The rate
cap is referred to as "soft" because sellers may bid above this level and
receive their bid if they are dispatched, but anything higher than $150/MWh
will not set the price that all other generators will receive. Any generator
setting a bid above $150/MWh must report their bid to the Commission, and
presumably fall under intense scrutiny.

FERC also officially adopted a policy that removes restrictions against
bilateral contracts in California and de-emphasizes spot-market activity.
Moving forward, buyers and sellers in the California market no longer
have to sell into and buy from the California PX. Instead, long-term contracts
may be established between power distribution utilities and power sellers.
Specifically, FERC set into place a $74/MWh "target price" for forward
contracts. This represented a new policy on the part of the Commission
that had not previously been outlined in its proposed order, and was the
source of a great deal of contention within FERC. Commissioner Linda Breathitt
offered that the $74/MWh target price could possibly set the "standard
for reasonableness." However, unlike the $150/MWh rate cap for transactions
on the open market, prices below the target price of $74/MWh will likely
be accepted without the same level of scrutiny from FERC. Higher prices
may be subject to review.

A month ago, FERC had proposed establishing independent (non-stakeholder)
boards for the California Independent System Operator (ISO) and the PX.
This turned out to be more easily said than done, and was one of the earlier
proposals from which FERC retreated in its final order. Essentially FERC
had wanted to replace existing members of the respective boards with new
members not associated with the energy industry. However, the word is out
that California Governor Gray Davis had put pressure on FERC to not adopt
this policy because the governor himself wants to be able to choose new
members for the boards that will be "more sensitive to the needs of California
consumers." In the end, FERC decided that a new governing structure for
both the ISO and PX would be put into place by April of next year, and
would be established with the cooperation of the governor and other state
officials. Until that time, the current board members will continue to
act in an advisory capacity.

Signaling that FERC's final order will by no means close the book on the
problems we are seeing in California, Southern California Edison (SCE)
immediately responded with "deep disappointment" to the Commission's order.
Specifically, SCE claims that the order will do nothing to protect California
consumers from the unjust and unreasonable wholesale electricity prices
that FERC already agreed were in existence in the state. SCE previously
had urged FERC to adopt cost-based pricing rules, meaning that each power
seller would be able to bid into the market at variable operating costs.
FERC had taken this cost-based approach with the initial operation of the
restructured PJM pool, which appears to be working rather well in that
area. However, FERC did not adopt this approach for California, and SCE
contends that since November the soft rate cap of $150/MWh has been in
place and rates have continued to skyrocket.

Reportedly, prices last week in California reached as high as $1,400/MWh,
compared to an average of $31/MWh, which SCE claims was the price that
it charged for power from its own plants during the month of December in
previous years. Thus, SCE contends that FERC has not fulfilled its regulatory
obligation to repair the system in California, and as a result a severe
operational crisis in the state now appears inevitable.

Again, as we saw with the proposed order, dissension ran high within the
FERC itself. Commissioner H,bert reportedly felt that the final order was
"too timid" and that it did not do enough to solve the problems in California.
FERC Chairman James Hoecker appeared to be open to region-wide rate caps,
which H,bert strongly opposed and said could never receive approval from
the Commission. H,bert's consistent position has been that FERC is
over-extending
its reach to mitigate prices, something he believes the Commission is
ill-equipped
to do. H,bert, who by the way is rumored to become the next FERC chair,
dislikes any kind of rate cap and prefers instead to let market participants
manage their own exposure to price risk.

As I had discussed when I outlined the proposed order back in November
(see IssueAlert from Nov. 2 on www.consultrci.com), I questioned whether
or not FERC could reach any long-term solutions to California's problems.
The lack of consensus regarding how to fix California's dysfunctional market*
not
only within the Commission, but throughout the industry as a whole*only
seems to be growing. FERC set out with the clear goal of bringing down
energy prices for consumers, but it is still questionable if this final
order can accomplish that objective. As SCE notes, the soft price cap has
done nothing to keep prices down in the state, and concerns about power
supply in California continue to increase. In fact, nearly every day during
this month the California ISO has issued a stage one or two emergency warning,
indicating that operating reserves of power in the state are falling to
alarming lows.

Consequently, although this order attempted to reach resolution, it still
seems like there is little chance that we will see the end of the debate
over California any time soon. Perhaps the best feature of this order is
the removal of the requirement that buyers must obtain their power through
the California PX. The three California investor-owned utilities (PG&E,
SCE and SDG&E) represent 80 percent of the buying market in the state.
Through establishing bilateral contracts, they will have a new way to
negotiate
the prices they pay for power, which could ultimately bring some stabilization
to the market in the state.

However, if California is indeed headed for even worse problems than it
has faced thus far, it will quickly become apparent whether or not FERC's
order does anything to abate the crisis. Quite possibly, the next course
of action could be taking the California issues to federal court for
resolution,
which*much like our recent presidential election*could mean months (or
years) of further negotiations.
===============================================================
SCIENTECH is pleased to provide you with your free, daily IssueAlert. Let
us know if we can help you with in-depth analyses or any other SCIENTECH
information products. If you would like to refer a colleague to receive
our free, daily IssueAlerts, please reply to this email and include their
full name and email address or register directly at:
http://www.consultrci.com/web/infostore.nsf/Products/IssueAlert
===============================================================
Feedback regarding SCIENTECH's IssueAlert and SourceBook Weekly should
be sent to wmcnamara@scientech.com
===============================================================

*********************************************************************
Reach thousands of utility analysts and decision makers every day. Your
company can schedule a sponsorship of IssueAlert by contacting Nancy Spring
at nspring@scientech.com or (505)244-7613. Advertising opportunities are
also available on our website.
*********************************************************************

SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts are compiled based on independent analysis by
SCIENTECH
consultants.  The opinions expressed in SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts are not
intended to predict financial performance of companies discussed or to
be the basis for investment decisions of any kind.  SCIENTECH's sole purpose
in publishing its IssueAlerts is to offer an independent perspective regarding
the key events occurring in the energy industry, based on its long-standing
reputation as an expert on energy and telecommunications issues.

Copyright 2000.  SCIENTECH, Inc.

If you do not wish to receive any further IssueAlerts from SCIENTECH, please
reply to this message and type "delete" in the subject line


Rodney:
Back when, Susan transfered all the files to me and we went through the
entire reg.risk process.  For the year I was in ISG, I never had to adjust
the reg.risk book.  I did not hand over the files to anyone else because the
group was breaking up and figured it was better that I keep them. I was in
yesterday going through all my files and the boxes under my desk and did not
come up  with them.  In rotating down to East Orig. I lost a box of stuff,
but I didn't think it had those files in it, but it looks like that was the
case.  Let me know what you want me to do, if anything at this point.  Again,
sorry for the delay.

Ben
3-7998


Sean works in structured origination.

Thanks,

Stacey L. Wales

Stacey Wales
Origination Transaction Support
Enron Industrial Markets
713-345-7186


Dave,

Here is the revised letter following our conversation.

Thanks,

Jeff


Kristen Bain
512 W. Daws
Norman, OR 73069
kmbain@earthlink.net

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Your action in this matter would do much more to refurbish your image and your name than your wife's current campaign to make you appear as a victim.  Do the right thing and save her the effort.

Sincerely,

Kristen Bain


--001nevereditthisline002
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"

-----------------------------------------------------------
This advertisement has been sent to you by TheStreet.com
because you are currently or within the last year have been
a subscriber (either free-trial or paid) to one of our web sites,
www.thestreet.com or www.realmoney.com. If you are not
a current or former subscriber, and you believe you received
this message in error, please forward this message to
members@thestreet.com, or call our customer service
department at 1-800-562-9571.  Please be assured that we
respect the privacy of you, our subscribers, and that we have
not disclosed your name or any other information about you
to the advertiser or any other third party.
-----------------------------------------------------------

Morgan Stanley Choice(SM) Account is the commission-free way to
invest with Morgan Stanley.

Now you can invest with a Morgan Stanley Financial Advisor, plus
be able to trade online, and have personal access to the world's
#1 research.*  All without ever paying a single commission - just
a fee based on the assets in your account.  The Morgan Stanley
Choice account.  One more way you're well connected.

Limited-time offer:  If you open a Morgan Stanley Choice(SM)
account before November 30, 2001, you can receive a comprehensive
Morgan Stanley Financial Outlook(SM) financial plan and a Morgan
Stanley debit Platinum MasterCard(R) card at no additional cost!

Want to stop paying commissions?  Move your money.  Visit
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;3420443;6475574;j?http://www.msdwadvice.com/choice
or call 1-8MORGAN-NOW and see if a Morgan Stanley Choice account
is right for you.

*Ranked #1 Global Research Team for 2000 by Institutional Investor
magazine, December 2000.

The Morgan Stanley Choice brokerage account is an alternative way
to pay for transactions.  Any investment advice is solely incidental
to Morgan Stanley's business as a broker-dealer.  Morgan Stanley
Choice is not for day trading or other extreme trading activity,
including excessive options trading or trading in mutual funds based
on market timing.  Morgan Stanley Choice carries a minimum $1,000
annual fee and closing fees may apply.  Morgan Stanley, Morgan Stanley
Choice, Morgan Stanley Financial Outlook and Well Connected are service
marks of Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co.  Services are offered through
Morgan Stanley DW Inc., member SIPC.  MasterCard is a registered
trademark of MasterCard International Inc. (C)2001 Morgan Stanley DW Inc.

-----------------------------------------------------------
This advertisement has been supplied by a third party and has
been sent to you by TheStreet.com for informational purposes
only.  We are not responsible for and have not independently
authenticated in whole or in part the accuracy of the information
provided in the advertisement.  No such information should be
relied upon without consulting the advertiser.  This advertisement
does not imply and endorsement by us.

TheStreet.com, Inc. is not registered as a securities broker-dealer
or an investment adviser either with the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission or with any state securities regulatory
authority.  No information on any of the Sites or dissemination of
advertising material is intended as securities brokerage,
investment, tax, accounting or legal advice by us, as an offer or
solicitation by us of an offer to sell or buy, or as an endorsement,
recommendation or sponsorship of any service, newsletter,
company, security, or fund.  We cannot and do not assess, verify
or guarantee the adequacy, accuracy or completeness of any
information, the suitability or profitability of any particular investment,
or the potential value of any investment or informational source.
You bear sole responsibility for your own investment research and
decisions, and should seek the advice of a qualified securities
professional before making any investment or purchase of
investment advice. Any sale or purchase of products or services,
or of securities or ownership interest that results from information
presented on the Sites or disseminated in advertising material will
be on a negotiated basis between the parties without any
additional participation by or remuneration to TheStreet.com, Inc.

If you would prefer not to receive these types of offers from us in
the future, please reply to thestreet@offers2.mail-thestreet.com
with REMOVE in the subject line.

To view our privacy policy, please click here:
http://www.thestreet.com/tsc/about/privacy.html
-----------------------------------------------------------

--001nevereditthisline002
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"

This advertisement has been sent to you by TheStreet.com
because you are currently or within the last year have been
a subscriber (either free-trial or paid) to one of our web sites,
www.thestreet.com or www.realmoney.com. If you are not
a current or former subscriber, and you believe you received
this message in error, please forward this message to
members@thestreet.com, or call our customer service
department at 1-800-562-9571.  Please be assured that we
respect the privacy of you, our subscribers, and that we have
not disclosed your name or any other information about you
to the advertiser or any other third party.

		<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1">
		<title>Limited-time offer from Morgan Stanley</title>

				Morgan Stanley Choicesm Account is the commission-free way to invest with Morgan Stanley.

					Now you can invest with a Morgan Stanley Financial Advisor, plus be able to trade online, and have personal access to the world’s #1 research.*  All without ever paying a single commission – just a fee based on the assets in your account.  The Morgan Stanley Choice account.  One more way you’re well connected.

						Limited-time offer:  If you open a Morgan Stanley ChoiceSM account before November 30, 2001, you can receive a comprehensive Morgan Stanley Financial OutlookSM financial plan and a Morgan Stanley debit Platinum MasterCard® card at no additional cost!

						Want to stop paying commissions? Move your money. Visit morganstanley.com/choice or call 1-8MORGAN-NOW and see if a Morgan Stanley Choice account is right for you.

				*Ranked #1 Global Research Team for 2000 by Institutional Investor magazine, December 2000.

						The Morgan Stanley Choice brokerage account is an alternative way to pay for transactions.  Any investment advice is solely incidental to Morgan Stanley’s business as a broker-dealer.  Morgan Stanley Choice is not for day trading or other extreme trading activity, including excessive options trading or trading in mutual funds based on market timing.  Morgan Stanley Choice carries a minimum $1,000 annual fee and closing fees may apply.  Morgan Stanley, Morgan Stanley Choice, Morgan Stanley Financial Outlook and Well Connected are service marks of Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co.  Services are offered through Morgan Stanley DW Inc., member SIPC.  MasterCard is a registered trademark of MasterCard International Inc. ©2001 Morgan Stanley DW Inc.

This advertisement has been supplied by a third party and has
been sent to you by TheStreet.com for informational purposes
only.  We are not responsible for and have not independently
authenticated in whole or in part the accuracy of the information
provided in the advertisement.  No such information should be
relied upon without consulting the advertiser.  This advertisement
does not imply and endorsement by us.

TheStreet.com, Inc. is not registered as a securities broker-dealer
or an investment adviser either with the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission or with any state securities regulatory
authority.  No information on any of the Sites or dissemination of
advertising material is intended as securities brokerage,
investment, tax, accounting or legal advice by us, as an offer or
solicitation by us of an offer to sell or buy, or as an endorsement,
recommendation or sponsorship of any service, newsletter,
company, security, or fund.  We cannot and do not assess, verify
or guarantee the adequacy, accuracy or completeness of any
information, the suitability or profitability of any particular investment,
or the potential value of any investment or informational source.
You bear sole responsibility for your own investment research and
decisions, and should seek the advice of a qualified securities
professional before making any investment or purchase of
investment advice. Any sale or purchase of products or services,
or of securities or ownership interest that results from information
presented on the Sites or disseminated in advertising material will
be on a negotiated basis between the parties without any
additional participation by or remuneration to TheStreet.com, Inc.

If you would prefer not to receive these types of offers from us in
the future, please reply to thestreet@offers2.mail-thestreet.com with REMOVE in the
subject line.

To view our privacy policy, please click here:
http://www.thestreet.com/tsc/about/privacy.html

--001nevereditthisline002--


Bill,

EPE length is in Enpower, deal# 577883, this will be out in RT Position Manager.  56mws for the day.
The schedule is as follows:

HE 1	8 mws
HE2	8 mws
HE3	8 mws
HE4	8mws
HE5	8mws
HE6	10mws
HE24	6mws

TOTAL 	= 56mws

Please sell this power real time.


Christina,

Please add the following items to our issues list.  I have talked to Leslie about these and she will be able to talk through them on Monday.

1.  Determine whether or not we need to establish POA's for cash accounts.
	This is a Day 1 issue.  Please insert after the 'Set up new cash accounts and lock box'.

2.  Determine whether or not financial commodity trading, other than power and gas, will be allowed in order to ensure that all adequate curves, indexes, etc and being established in the rate system.

	This is a Day 1 issue.

3.  Need to set up meeting to discuss approval processes for new curves, books, settlement indexes after Day 1.  Suggested groups to be involved: Market Risk, Credit Risk, Finance and Control, Operations.

4.  Discussion around the use of Enron's 'New Counterparty' methodology.
	This is a Day 1 issue.

Thanks,
Stacey


Thanks for your leadership on this issue.  The commercial staff has been very concerned about the lack of daily data and I haven't made much headway with the GMS folks.  I'm glad you are involved!

I will be traveling out of the country next week.  Others from my staff will attend and I'll catch up when I return.

Happy Holidays
Shelley
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


I have received my health insurance and perscription drug card but not my
dental card. Hopefully today my mail will find me.

Chris Dorland


-----Original Message-----
From: Hay, James E. [mailto:JHay@sempra.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 3:31 PM
To: 'JBennett'
Subject: RE: A.01-01-044 SDG&E's Updated/Rebuttal/Small Customer Testimony
First Email

Second email --

-----Original Message-----
From: JBennett [ mailto:JBennett@GMSSR.com <mailto:JBennett@GMSSR.com> ]
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 3:14 PM
To: 'Hay, James E.'
Subject: RE: A.01-01-044 SDG&E's Updated/Rebuttal/Small Customer
Testimony First Email

They have not come through yet.  I will let you know.  Thank you.  Jeanne
Bennett

-----Original Message-----
From: Hay, James E. [ mailto:JHay@sempra.com <mailto:JHay@sempra.com> ]
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 3:00 PM
To: 'Jbennett@gmssr.com'
Subject: RE: A.01-01-044 SDG&E's Updated/Rebuttal/Small Customer Testimony
First Email

Ms. Bennett, please let me know if you were able to open the files in the
email that I just sent to you.

        This filing is Exhibit 38.  If you are unable to open the files,
please email me and I will send them to you one at a time.  .... Jim Hay

        Jim Hay
Regulatory Project Manager
Sempra Energy
101 Ash Street HQ14B
San Diego, CA 92101-3017
Email - jhay@sempra.com

         Phone - 619-696-2141 Fax - 619-696-4027

         -----Original Message-----
From:   Hay, James E.
Sent:   Thursday, October 18, 2001 2:57 PM
To:     'Jbennett@gmssr.com'
Subject:        FW: A.01-01-044 SDG&E's Updated/Rebuttal/Small Customer
Testimony  First  Email

         << Message: FW: Reply of SDG&E to ALJ Wetzell's Ruling of August
15, 2001 in A.00-10-045/A.01-01-044 >>  << Message: FW: Second E-Mail:
Reply of SDG&E to ALJ Wetzell's Ruling of August 15, 2001 in
A.00-10-045/A.01-01-044 >>  << Message: FW: Third E-Mail:  Reply of SDG&E to

ALJ Wetzell's Ruling of August 15, 2001 in A.00-10-045/A.01-01-044 >>

         -----Original Message-----
From:   Van Wagenen, Lynn G.
Sent:   Thursday, October 18, 2001 2:33 PM
To:
Cc:     Melville, Keith W.; Hay, James E.
Subject:        FW: A.01-01-044 SDG&E's Updated/Rebuttal/Small Customer
Testimony

        Jeanne,  I understand from Keith Melville that you were looking for
various pieces of SDG&E's May 18, 2001 filing in our Revenue Shortfall
Surcharge Application (A.00-10-045/A.01-01-044).  I have included in the
attached note the entire SDG&E filing.  Hopefully, you will be able to find
in the package the information/data you are seeking.  Recognize that there
were some corrections made on the stand by some of the witnesses.  I would
recommend that you check the transcript for those corrections.

        Also, Keith tells me you also wanted a copy of Exhibit #38.  Jim Hay

will send it to you in a separate e-mail.

        Please let us know, if you need further documents in this
proceeding.  Have a great day!

         Lynn G, Van Wagenen
Lynn G. Van Wagenen
Sempra Energy - San Diego
Regulatory Case Management
(619) 696-4055   FAX - Ext. 4027
E-Mail:  LVanWagenen@sempra.com

        -----Original Message-----
From:   Evans, Darleen
Sent:   Friday, May 18, 2001 4:35 PM
To:     bfinkelstein@turn.org; bishop@jrwood.com; Brill, Thomas;
bsl@cpuc.ca.gov; chiefskip@aol.com; christine.costa@sce.com; cjw5@pge.com;
cwrmccv@worldnet.att.net; cxw@cpuc.ca.gov;
DavoodiKR@efaches.navfac.navy.mil; dlf@cpuc.ca.gov;
douglass@arterhadden.com; dpritchard@mofo.com; DVRONROCK@ADPLAW.COM;
edf@cpuc.ca.gov; ek@a-klaw.com; epoole@adplaw.com; fmo@sdcity.sannet.gov;
freedman@turn.org; furutanj@efawest.navfac.navy.mil; jbennett@gmssr.com;
jguzman@nossaman.com; jleslie@luce.com; jmalkin@orrick.com;
jsqueri@gmssr.com; jtachera@energy.state.ca.us; jweil@aglet.org;
mbrubaker@consultbai.com; mdjoseph@adamsbroadwell.com; Melville, Keith;
mjaske@energy.state.ca.us; mshames@ucan.org; msw@cpuc.ca.gov;
mv1@cpuc.ca.gov; pbray@newpower.com; raw@cpuc.ca.gov;
riald@kindermorgan.com; rliebert@cfbf.com; rmccann@cal.net; sfc@cpuc.ca.gov;

sro@cpuc.ca.gov; ssmyers@worldnet.att.net; tknox@klalawfirm.com;
tsmegal@calwater.com; uwuaregion5@earthlink.net

        Cc:     Croyle, David; Derbas, Mohamed; Evans, Darleen; Fong, Ed;
Hansen, Douglas; Resley, Robert; Rossi, Rosalinda; Saxe, William; Schavrien,

Lee; Schneider, Michael; Swanson, Rich

        Subject:        A.01-01-044 SDG&E's Updated/Rebuttal/Small Customer
Testimony

        TESTIMONY:

         << File: A.01-01-044 Croyle PD(v1).DOC >>  << File: A.01-01-044
Croyle Rebuttal(v1).DOC >>  << File: A.01-01-044 Croyle Updated PDT(v1).DOC
>>  << File: A.01-01-044 Derbas Rebuttal(v1).DOC >>  << File: A.01-01-044
Derbas PD(v1).DOC >>  << File: A.01-01-044 Derbas Updated PDT(v1).DOC >>  <<

File: A.01-01-044 Fong Updated PDT(v1).DOC >>  << File: A.01-01-044 Fong
Rebuttal(v1).DOC >>  << File: A.01-01-044 Fong PD(v1).DOC >>

        _____________________________
ATTACHMENTS/TABLES:

         << File: Bill Impacts (large).xls >>  << File: Bill Impacts
(small).xls >>  << File: SDGE.RD.Template5-18(Large) DecisionTemp1.XLS >>
<< File: SDGE.RD.Template5-18(Large)FINAL Update2.XLS >>  << File:
SDGE.RD.Template5-18(SMALL)DecisionTemp1.xls >>  << File:
SDGE.RD.Template5-18(SMALL)FINAL1.xls >>

        __________________________________

        Darleen Evans

        Sempra Energy - Law Department

        619-699-5056

        devans@sempra.com

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  <JHay@sempra.com>
To: Van Wagenen, Lynn G. <LVanWagenen@sempra.com>
Date: Friday, August 17, 2001 5:42:07 GMT
Subject:

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Hay, James E.
Sent:   Friday, August 17, 2001 9:24 AM
To:     Reed, Debra L.; Parrott, Jeff; Trace, Jeffrey; Melville, Keith W.;
Deremer, Kenneth; Schavrien, Lee; Savage, Marie; Schneider, Michael M.;
Strong, Michael G.; Derbas, Mohamed; Szymanski, Paul; Swanson, Rich; Resley,
Robert J.; Jack, Stephen J.; Rahon, Steve; Garcia, Sue E.; Weinmeister, Sue;
Roberts, Ted; Farrelly, Terry C.; Brill, Thomas R.; Saxe, William; Kline,
Doug; Farmer, Laura; Larson, Art; Fair, Pam; Avery, James; Overturf, Billie
J.; John, Fred E.; Reed, William

Subject:        FW: Second E-Mail:  Reply of SDG&E to ALJ Wetzell's Ruling
of August 15, 2001 in A.00-10-045/A.01-01-044

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Hay, James E.
Sent:   Friday, August 17, 2001 9:01 AM
To:     Schavrien, Lee; Mueller, Michelle; Fong, Ed; Melville, Keith W.
Subject:        FW: Second E-Mail:  Reply of SDG&E to ALJ Wetzell's Ruling
of August 15, 2001 in A.00-10-045/A.01-01-044

Second of three emails.

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Ruiz, Annie
Sent:   Friday, August 17, 2001 8:36 AM
To:     ayk@cpuc.ca.gov; bfinkelstein@turn.org; bishop@jrwood.com; Brill,
Thomas; bsl@cpuc.ca.gov; chiefskip@aol.com; christine.costa@sce.com;
cjw5@pge.com; cwrmccv@worldnet.att.net; DavoodiKR@efaches.navfac.navy.mil;
dlf@cpuc.ca.gov; douglass@energyattorney.com; DVRONROCK@ADPLAW.COM;
edf@cpuc.ca.gov; ek@a-klaw.com; epoole@adplaw.com; fmo@sdcity.sannet.gov;
freedman@turn.org; furutanj@efawest.navfac.navy.mil; jbennett@gmssr.com;
jguzman@nossaman.com; jleslie@luce.com; jmalkin@orrick.com;
jsqueri@gmssr.com; jtachera@energy.state.ca.us; jweil@aglet.org;
mbrubaker@consultbai.com; mdjoseph@adamsbroadwell.com; Melville, Keith;
mjaske@energy.state.ca.us; mshames@ucan.org; msw@cpuc.ca.gov;
mv1@cpuc.ca.gov; mzr@cpuc.ca.gov; pbray@newpower.com; raw@cpuc.ca.gov;
rax@cpuc.ca.gov; riald@kindermorgan.com; rliebert@cfbf.com; sfc@cpuc.ca.gov;
sro@cpuc.ca.gov; ssmyers@worldnet.att.net; tknox@klalawfirm.com;
tsmegal@calwater.com; uwuaregion5@earthlink.net

Cc:     Hay, James E.
Subject:        Second E-Mail:  Reply of SDG&E to ALJ Wetzell's Ruling of
August 15, 2001 in A.00-10-045/A.01-01-044

The following are SDG&E's Exhibit 14 updates.

<<Exhibit 14 (Scenario 1).xls>>          <<Exhibit 14 (Scenario 2).xls>>
<<Exhibit 14 (Scenario 3).xls>>              <<Exhibit 14 (Scenario 4).xls>>
<<Exhibit 14 (Scenario 5).xls>>               <<Exhibit 14 (Scenario
6).xls>>

Annie Ruiz

Assistant to Jeffrey M. Parrott

Sempra Energy Law Department  HQ-13

Tel: 619-696-4903  Fax: 619-699-5027

E-mail: aruiz@sempra.com


Please forward any documents / info regarding current issues with Oneok to my
attention and copy Russell Diamond.

Thanks,
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Please add the following person.

Victoria Versen

happy Turkey day.

Dave Scott@EES
10/27/2000 06:13 AM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FOM distribution

Chris, my FOM and daily requirements e-mail currently goes to the following
people at ENA:

C Germany
S Goodell
S Gillespie
C Franklin
C Pendergrass
D Espey
C Vachuska
M Mitchell
K Ruscitti

David


TJ,

We'll need another room.  These meetings are only for the MidWest traders.
The meeting with the guy from PJM is for the northeast group.

Thanks,

Fletch


Men,

Wanting to "man off", needing to "man off", are we still planning on "being with men" on Thursday?

Only "men" need to respond?

                                                                                Piggy


Ed

How are you doing on these reports.
---------------------- Forwarded by John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron on 07/17/2000
09:38 AM ---------------------------

David W Delainey@ECT
06/29/2000 12:33 PM
To: Edward D Baughman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tammy R
Shepperd/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Monthly Mid Market Coverage Report

Ed, sounds like you have this handled - I would like to use your report as
the example to use in other groups.  It can wait until you have it all
completed.  You may want to think about EOL as well (ie) how many companies
have you brought on-line, etc.

 summary:
  - coverage metrics;
  - market iniatives;
  - completed deals;
  - hot list;
  - EOL metrics.

Thxs
Delainey

---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 06/29/2000
12:30 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Edward D Baughman                           06/29/2000 10:34 AM

To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tammy R
Shepperd/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Monthly Mid Market Coverage Report

Dave:

I want to be sure I am on the right track for providing you ,John and Kevin
with meaningful account coverage data. I envision a one page
summary that provides you with a monthly and quarterly sub-region coverage
ratio. I propose that the quarterly coverage standard be set
at 100%. The monthly coverage standard would be at least 50%. These standards
would drive consistent, ongoing coverage of commercially
active customers. Less active or inactive customers would be contacted at
least once a quarter to determine status changes and propose
product structures. This reporting format would also place emphasis on each
commercial team's coverage effectiveness or lack thereof.  I will
derive this summary from a master customer list that will show contact dates
and specific comments on customer status. I anticipate this master
list to be 20-25 pages. I propose to provide you a copy of the master list
quarterly in order to corroborate the monthly summary. Do my proposed
coverage standards and reporting format meet your expectations?

In addition, I have asked my commercial teams to prepare regional business
plans by July 12. A primary component of these plans will be
identification of major new business initiatives by sub-region. Tammy
Shepperd asked me to provide you with an initial report this week. I
don't want to provide you with something "half-baked".  Is it acceptable to
allow my commercial teams to complete their plans then provide
you with our suggested initiatives by July 13 ?

Finally, I have provided Tammy with reports on 1st/2nd quarter completed
transactions plus a deal flow "hot list" .

Sorry for being verbose. Please advise.

Thanks,     Ed


Nothing with or pertaining to either Morningstar and Insource to the best of
my knowledge.

Kay C. Young
Legal Specialist
Enron North America Corp.
713-853-6794 Phone
713-646-3393 Fax
kay.young@enron.com

	Tana Jones
	03/29/2001 02:30 PM

		 To: Kay Young/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Two NDAs

Can you please let me know if there are any existing NDA's in place with
Morningstar Systems Inc. and Insource Techology Corporation.  Thank you!


The 5 Day Roll figure has been corrected.

 10-25 Enovate.xls


Dear Randy,  The Washington bureau will have a full plate when we return from Thanksgiving break.  Congress returns with many lawmakers urging action on energy legislation before the end of the year.  Washington Bureau Chief Peter Cook says there's a long list of legislation ahead of energy in the Democrat-controlled Senate, but Republicans are threatening to force a vote through a filibuster.  In turn, Democrats are saying they'll filibuster any energy bill containing a provision to open Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to drilling.  The legislation battle continues next week.   Peter also says the Washington bureau will continue to follow the FERC's major decisions regarding how it assesses market power.  The Commission announced a major change this week that will impact many of the large and small utilities across the country.   Also next week, we'll see what Energy Daily Publisher Llewellyn King has to say about Pat Wood's performance as Chairman of the FERC.  And rumors are flying about DOE Secretary Spencer Abraham - on Monday, King talks about the whispers he's hearing in Washington.   ENL's Gale Smith will have a report from the Houston bureau next week on a Louisiana company that uses rice hulls to create power.  Agrilectric Incorporated consumes some of this power, but most of the electricity is sold to an area utility company.  We'll have details next week.   Also, Houston Correspondent Kim Benestante will bring us coverage from the Alaska Resources Conference taking place next Thursday and Friday.  We'll also bring you details on the final report regarding the chosen route of the Arctic natural gas pipeline.  The report is due to Alaska's Governor on November 30.   We'll hear from Center for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Technologies Executive Director John White next week.  ENL's Kym McNicholas will speak with White about his organization's opposition to the state's long-term power contracts.  Catch White from the West Coast bureau next week.   Closing Prices for Nov. 21, 2001:   Crude: $18.96       Unleaded: $0.5273   Heating Oil: $0.5342   Natural Gas: $2.813    Keep in mind things are subject to change at a moment's notice. Occasionally guests have to cancel or change time slots.  We'll continue to do our best to keep you updated on future interviews and events. Have a great Thanksgiving break!  We'll see you on Monday.   Be sure to watch our newscasts every business day - 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. ET, at the top of each hour.

	 	Jay Rickerts, EnergyNewsLive.com Anchor  View today's Energy Wrap Video Windows Media Player: 56K  |  100K  |  300K  Real Player: 56K  |  100K  |  300K  (Requires Windows Media Player or Real Player )   Experience all that Williams Energy News Live has to offer!   If you are receiving this letter for the first time and wish to continue, subscribe now    To stop receiving this letter, unsubscribe now    If you are having trouble receiving this e-mail, please let us know  or  call (800) WILLIAMS (800-945-5426) weekdays, 7am-7pm CST.    Comments? Suggestions? Let us  know  or  call (800) WILLIAMS (800-945-5426) weekdays, 7am-7pm CST.    Copyright 2001 Williams Energy News Live, LLC. All  Rights Reserved.


I would like to have all sales of CIG Mainline next day physical gas to bridge over to Sitara under the following meter location:

CIG/Mainline/991764500

and all buys to

CIG/Mainline/UNA-516938

Please let me know what effects (if any) this will have on the bridging process, Sitara, and confirmations.

Thank you,

Jay Reitmeyer
713-853-3536


Here is a draft of the memo to send to the IT guys.  Let me know your
thoughts.

P.S. -- the list of names is just a partial list.  Richard is tracking down
some additional people to add.  We will have that, I hope, later today.


Sun Devil:
Sonoran Pipeline -  KMI should have an offer to us during the week of 10/1.
ROW - Left message for AZ Public Service ROW agent to discuss use of water line as possible route for gas line to serve Red Hawk plant.
Cost estimate - Agreed with engineering to delay cost estimate until 10/2.  Preliminary indications are we will need to begin scaling back cost beginning with compression.
Marketing -
	Duke - Waiting for response, left message 9/28.
	AZ Public Service - Total gas consumption across 2 plants estimated to be 380,000 MMBtu/d by 2004.  Their Red Hawk plant is adjacent to the Duke 	Arlington plant.  Plan to meet in Phoenix week of 10/8 after cost estimate complete.
	Sempra - No respsonse yet, left message 9/26.
Cost estimate prepared for initial Environmental work for FERC filing - $9.4mm.
Preparing risk analytics / mitigants for RAROC
Joe Hartsoe / Nancy Bagot will monitor El Paso FR case (RP00-336) and report on further studies and answers questions posed at 24 Sept conference or in writing
	- Initial comments (on all capacity allocation issues and procedural recommendations): Oct. 15
	- Reply comments:  Oct. 26

Kingman CS heat recovery project
Mojave requested firm pricing; ETS awaiting revised cost estimate from ABB to compare with internal estimates.
PPA term sheet (rev. #3) forwarded to legal for review/comment - plan to release to Mojave during week of 10/1

Pipeline expansion to Georgia and Alabama
Still progressing analyses
Co-ordinating with Dowd on Wolverine

Alaskan Northwest Natural Gas Transportation Company
Partially executed CA with TCPL, Foothills, Westcoast, and ANNGTC; final execution imminent
Assembled ETS project team
Due diligence team in Calgary during week of 1 Oct
Draft MOU undergoing internal review; comments due Monday.

McNeil Bullet (B==>C segment of Alaska gas pipeline)
Technical concept: 2-3 BCF/d pipeline along NBP r-o-w to transport Alaska gas to midwest markets (Chicago)
Develop Heads of Terms for 50/50 jv between TCPL and Enron
Analyze merits of including El Paso in the jv; legal to check potential market dominance issues contained in FTC consent decree on El Paso merger.
Follow-up meeting with TCPL in ~10 days

Trailblazer
Advised EGNG that KMI was preparing a bid for ETS equity share.
Mike McGowan prepared analysis of CIG-Trailblazer-NNG mainline concept to compete with Coco expansion project.

Pacer (Omaha)
[to follow]

FPL 1750 MW RFP
ETS withdrew from RFP process
ETS and ENA progressing discussions wrt co-development of the Deerfield site (3+1 configuration, 822 MWs)
ENA submitted multiple bids

Storage business development
Following CBR, Paul Bieniawski (prospective team recruit) to prepare storage business plan in consultation with Kent Miller et al.

Consulting support
Arranged 6 month renewable consulting agreement with Steve Dickerson; initial focus to be western gas supplies + markets


As always, when we have a juicy topic, anyone on your  staffs that you think
would benefit from this are invited to attend.  DF
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 10/25/2000
01:49 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Drew Fossum                           10/25/2000 01:49 PM

To: Dari Dornan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lee Huber/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Tony
Pryor/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Maria Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan
Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jim Talcott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kathy
Ringblom/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Michael Moran/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kim Wilkie/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin
Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, John Dushinske/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Shelley
Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Electric Developments

When we originally decided to use my staff meetings for "graduate education"
one of the hot topics was the electric industry.  We all had a first lesson
on this topic in Shelley's electricity seminar last summer.  Now, John and
Kevin have graciously agreed to join us Tuesday at 1:30 to discuss recent
developments in electric markets and NN's and TW's efforts to attract power
generation load to the system.  Specific topics I hope to cover include the
following:
1.  What are the key factors that determine where a power plant developer
puts his plant?
2.  Do the transmission access and pricing rules of the various
utilities/power pools vary all that much or are Order 888 tariffs pretty much
the same all over?
3.  How do IPPs decide what fuel supply strategy works best (i.e., buy
bundled delivered fuel from someone vs. buy gas, storage, transport, etc.
separately)?
4.  What is the RTO Rule and why should we care?
5.  Has $5/mmbtu gas killed the gas fired power market?
 Depending on how deeply we get into these topics, we may need to schedule a
follow-up session at a later date.  I look forward to seeing you on Tuesday.
DF


This was sent for my approval.  The manager listed below does not work in
Energy Operations.  This should be sent to someone else for approval.
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 08/22/2000 09:00 AM
---------------------------

From:  Information Risk Management/HOU/ECT

Subject: Your approval is requested

	Security Resource Request System
Application Approval
Please review and act upon this request. You have received this eMail because
you are listed as an approver on the original request.
			Instructions
For: 	Laura Levy
Request	Original:
Application Name:	EOL - Other (US)
Request Type:	Grant
Role(s):
Comments:	Read only		Review the request in the Request section at left.
			For more information regarding who the request is for, do the following:
			Click on the name for PeopleFinder info
			See the Further Information section below
			In the Approval Section, select Approve or Reject, enter comments as
necessary and click [Submit].

	Further Information

Requestor:			Laura Levy
Manager:	Tammie Schoppe
Request Date:	08/21/2000 11:24:40 AM
RC #:	106297	WO #:
Company #:	0413	Priority:	Normal
General Comments:


Please review and provide comments

 <<X29120.DOC>>

Jeanne


Enron in Action can be accessed through the new Community Relations web site at http://cr.enron.com/eia.html .  In this week's issue you will find out information regarding:

Enron Happenings
Enron September 11 Disaster Recovery Update
Get connected with e-Statements
Educational Software Drive benefiting the Native American Library and Museum Project
BEAR Holiday Fundraiser
2001 Holiday Shopping Card benefiting the American Cancer Society
Enron Kids 2001 Holiday Program
Support the Museum of Natural Science at the Crate & Barrel Opening Night Preview Party

Enron Volunteer Opportunities
Thanksgiving Volunteer Opportunity

Enron Wellness
CPR/First Aid Training
Mammogram Screening
November is Lung Cancer Awareness Month

Involved Employees
4th Annual UCP Celebrity Golf Classic
Beginner Ballroom Dance Lessons

In addition, Enron in Action is available through a channel on my.home.enron.com.  To add this channel to your set-up click on the channels link at the top of the screen and under announcements check the Enron in Action box.

If you wish to add an announcement to Enron in Action, please fill out the attached form below and submit it to mailto:eia@enron.com no later than 12 PM Thursday each week.


We are happy to announce the arrival of several new Employees to the ENA-Portland office!

Serena Bishop began working with the Short Term California Desk late last week.
She is a '01 graduate from the University of Portland, with a degree in Business Administration.

James Bruce is one of the most recent additions to the Structuring Group. He graduated in June '01 from
the University of Oregon, where he received his Bachelors degree in Business Administration--emphasis on Finance.

Darren Cavanaugh is also a Spring graduate of the U of O, where he received his degree in Business Administration
(concentration in Finance and Minor in Economics). He is now part of the Volume Management team.

David Frost is a transfer from Enron Broadband Services (Portland).  He is an Associate who will use his
EBS experience in his new rotation working with Jeff Richter and the EES/EWS groups.

Jim Meyer is a new addition to the IT Development Group and comes to us from Razorfish. He has worked with ENW as a consultant and will continue to use his extensive software development knowledge to assist the Volume Management Group.

 Chris Mumm is the latest addition to the Structuring Group. He graduated from the University of Oregon with
a Masters in Business Administration--concentration: Finance.  Chris received his undergraduate degree from
Eastern Washington University in '98 with five majors (yes, in four years):  Finance, Marketing,
Economics, Human Resource Management, General Management (!!!).

Nick Warner is the newest member to join the Risk Management Group.  He graduated in June '01 from Oregon
State University with a Business Administration degree focused on International Business and Finance.

Andrea Woodland is another EBS transfer, who has joined JonAlan Page as a manager in West Origination-Commercial Support.

-	-	-	-	-	-

Please join us in welcoming all of our new hires to our Portland office!
We look forward to working with them!


Please contact me if you have any questions with April pricing.

Thank you,
Karolyn Criado
3-9441


Gerald,

Do we have a dedicated speaker phone in the deposition room?

My phone number over the weekend is 850 510 5308. I keep it on all the time.

Bill


No.


Chris what is the deal number to this  incremental tkt??????

---------------------- Forwarded by Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT on 02/01/2000
03:21 PM ---------------------------
From: Joan Veselack@ENRON on 01/31/2000 05:54 PM
To: Dick Jenkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Hendrickson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Joann Collins/Corp/Enron@ENRON@ECT, Robert Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor
Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT, Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris
Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Fixed price deal - PLEASE READ

Is this note to Brian below incremental gas????????

Meaning... Joann has a number about 250,000/day given to her by the LDC
Schedulers. This includes daily volume:

Who    Volume  Sitara Deal Ticket
CES Endusers    93689  143336
Choice    107489  148416
South Jersey   36900  142776
Penn Fuel   5000  151759
Hopewell   4500  139679
Texaco    255  136502
Engage   1966  142656
Florida Power and Light  152  151788

Total    249,951

Is there a way to put all incremental gas on one deal ticket??? It would make
our pathing life a lot easier too!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Chris Germany@ECT
01/31/2000 03:41 PM
To: bperron@columbiaenergy.com
cc: Joann Collins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joan Veselack/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robert
Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Fixed price deal

I believe you did a fixed priced deal with Craig Taylor.  The price is
$3.06.  Could you get me the meter numbers?  This is what I have so far

COH Mrkt Area Monthly Vol Meter
7 5  700
7 1  1141
7 1  682
7 5  1993
7 5  2881
8 5  5534
9 5  12309
5 2  1577


Let's make sure she gets an offer.  Thanks.  Jeff

Vince J Kaminski
01/23/2001 01:23 PM
To: Kristin Gandy/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: FW: Wharton Resume Submission - Summer Intern

Kristin.

Kim is a member of the Tiger Team. She is interested in a summer
internship with Enron and I shall be glad to take her.

Vince
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 01/23/2001
01:24 PM ---------------------------

"Kim Whitsel" <Kimberly.Whitsel.wg02@wharton.upenn.edu> on 01/22/2001
12:07:35 AM
To: <Christie.Patrick@enron.com>, <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: FW: Wharton Resume Submission

-----Original Message-----
From: Kim Whitsel [mailto:Kimberly.Whitsel.wg02@wharton.upenn.edu]
Sent: Friday, December 22, 2000 6:51 PM
To: kristin.gandy@enron.com
Subject: Wharton Resume Submission

Summer Position under Wharton Schedule #1823
 - Kim Whitsel -Enron Cover Letter.doc
 - Kim Whitsel- Wharton2 resume.doc


Could you please take a moment to rspond on the attached. Thanks You
---------------------- Forwarded by Rob G Gay/NA/Enron on 12/19/2000 09:21 AM
---------------------------

Christiaan Huizer@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
12/19/2000 06:20 AM
To: Rob G Gay/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Laine A Powell/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Richard A
Lammers/SA/Enron@Enron, Tracee Bersani/HOU/ECT@ECT@ENRON, Felipe
Ospina/NA/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: EPE Dispatch

Rob,

Regarding items 1 and 2, please contact Lucio Reis in Sao Paulo office and he
can explain.

Item 3 is incorrect. The 300 MW would be generated by the two gas turbines at
about 100 MW each and the remaining 100 MW coming from the steam turbine. The
steam turbine receives its energy from the exit gases from the gas turbines
and they both contribute equally to the resulting steam turbine output
(theoretically at least, in practice depending on optimization of machines)

Again, please talk with Lucio.

Regards,

Christiaan

Rob G Gay@ENRON
12/18/2000 04:41 PM
To: Laine A Powell/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Christiaan
Huizer/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Richard A Lammers/SA/Enron@Enron
cc: Tracee Bersani/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: EPE Dispatch

Here is what we have concluded based on discussions this morning:

1) We believe that Furnas has agreed to contract and pay for 300 MW on oil to
meet regulatory requirements concerning required capacity and reserve
margin.  We do not believe that they intend for us to be dispatrched above
220 MW. (Do we have any document which could substantiate this?)

2) Although  dispatch on a merit order basis would suggest that EPE runs full
time (with 300 MW available),  there are practical constraints in the
transmission system which will prohibit this from actually occuring. [ Please
describe these constraints using some official sounding jargon but minimal
detail and in particular indicate what is involved to de-bottleneck and how
long this will take.  I presume that Furnas is solely responsible for the
corrective measures.]

3) Based on our analysis, the optimal operating approach would be to generate
220MW with  one turbine and 91 MW with the other for a total of 311 if
dipatched above 220 MW.

If we can prove that 1) & 2) are correct or convince the lenders that they
are, then I think we can suggest that fuel oil exposure is negligibe if gas
is ready by April 01.  We will have to see how it looks when we add the Sue
Garvin flex months.

Therefore, a merit order analysis is only necessary if i) our supposition
about Furnas' motivations are incorrect and/or ii) the transmission problem
is cleared.  If this happens it would be nice to be able to predict reduced
fuel utilization due to a) reduced dispatch during daily off-peak hours or
seasonal impacts, b) due to scheduled outages, and c) due to managing our
availabilty in such a way as to reduce fuel consumption operating losses.
Any data you can provide will be helpful.

Have I successfully connected the dots here?

If you have previously sent these materials to Felipe or Tracee please simply
grumble to yourself if you have to do an extra e-mail to me.  Remember, you
don't have to be nice to a short timer unless you need them to get something
done.

Regards,

Rob


Hello!

I will meet you in the middle. . .work until noon on Friday, and then get out
of here.  It is hard to justify our team taking the entire day off since our
responsbilities are not completely dependent on daily trading activities or
nomination activities.  That, of course, IS TRUE for Logistics and Risk.

To be consistent, I will give the OA team the same info.  Volume Mgmt. and
Settlements will be jealous.

Thanks,
Carrie