Sounds like a plan...

Could everyone please continue to reply to all when possible and
appropriate?  I will be leaving to meet with he Governor around 11:00am and
our Chairman, Stew Thomas and our Controller, Brad Flinn will be taking over
on this...  I continue to forward each message to them... this will just
make it easier as well as insure that they are acting immediately upon your
messages / requests...

I have included their e-mails above...

Thanks,

Douglas G. Thomas
President & C.E.O.
Bellingham Cold Storage
doug.thomas@bellcold.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Malowney [SMTP:John.Malowney@enron.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2000 7:36 AM
> To: Robert McCullough
> Cc: Doug Thomas; John Cameron; Tracy Ngo; Shari Stack; Tana Jones
> Subject: Re: Follow up....
>
>
>
> Gentlemen, as we speak Enron's Credit and Legal teams are conversing on
> the best
> way to approach, either an ISDA or a Long Form Confirm, for "papering" the
> requested financial hedge.  Once Enron Credit is "comfortable" with
> Bellingham
> Cold Storage (BCS), Legal will prepare the necessary documentation, once
> approved by BCS/John Cameron, I will quote work up some July executable
> numbers
> and attempt to contact the Robert, Doug, John C.  This will require
> everyone's
> joint efforts in order to accomplish this in such a short time line.  BCS
> and
> John Cameron should anticipate a call from either or Enron's Credit and
> Legal
> personnel.  Thanks,  John
>
>
>
>
>  (Embedded     Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.
>  image moved
>  to file:      From:  Robert McCullough
>  pic09141.pcx) <robert@mresearch.com>
>                06/30/2000 06:55 AM
>
>
>
>
>
>
> To:   John Malowney <John.Malowney@enron.com>
> cc:   Doug Thomas <Doug.Thomas@bellcold.com>, John Cameron
> <johncameron@dwt.com>
> Subject:  Good morning!
>
>
> We need numbers as soon as possible this morning -- also these must be
> serious -- not notional.
>
> I am at 771-5090.  I will be available at 784-3758 all day.  My email
> follows me around so you can always get me  on email.
>
>
>  << File: pic09141.pcx >>


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Mike A Roberts/HOU/ECT on 09/20/2000
09:06 AM ---------------------------

Scott Tholan@ENRON
09/19/2000 07:57 PM
To: Mark Tawney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike A
Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Chris Clark/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Sacramento Weather Station

Hey guys,
 We're talking to a contractor(s) that can build us a weather station
(hopefully very quickly) for placement in Sacramento, California.  For a
variety of legal, contractor, and operational reasons, I need to confirm some
of the following requirements as soon as possible so we can proceed:

a)  You need rainfall, snowfall, and temperature measurement from one,
high-accuracy commercially available weather station.
b)  You need a daily feed of this data to Enron's weather desk:  Does this
mean one data dump at a set time per day?  Alternatively, will you need to
check the data real-time, perhaps at varying and multiple times during the
day?
c)  We will be installing this station near Sacramento, California:  We will
need to know exactly what areas in/near Sacramento are suitable for the site
of the weather station.  (What again was the name of the town that you
mentioned Mark?)  In the interest of time, I recommend that your weather
expert accompany our landman to select the site, which will allow our landman
to more quickly lease and install the station.
d)  You desire to have some independent security measures to deter or detect
tampering. I suggest given the very short time fuse, that we first install
the station and then develop security measures.
e)  We will feed the data directly to the Enron weather desk.  Will any other
parties require real-time access to this data?

Please forward responses directly to:  Chris Clark/NA/ENRON and myself.
Thanks,  Scott


The form we have has this as the first paragraph, which is different from the
form attached.  Could you conform the NW one to the form?

Enron North America Corp. (&ENA8 or the "Protected Party") is prepared to
furnish [__________________] (&*8 or the "Receiving Party") with certain
information which is either confidential, proprietary or otherwise not
generally available to the public in connection with: (i) the potential sale
of one or more of the Protected Party's power plant development projects
and/or one of more of the special purpose companies which own such projects
in [states],  (collectively, the &Projects8) for purposes of evaluating one
or more transactions between Protected Party and   * involving the Projects
(collectively, the &Proposed Transaction8).


-----Original Message-----
From: 	O'Gorman, Karon
Sent:	Wednesday, October 17, 2001 5:10 PM
To:	Thompson, Debra
Subject:	RE: Price Quote for New Laptop

I'll have Richard Wendt pick up your surplus laptop.

The price on a new Compaq M700 1ghz laptop with 284mb memory and case is approx $1800
For a Docking Station its about $200 more

Send me an email when you are ready to order.

Thanks, Karon

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Thompson, Debra
Sent:	Wednesday, October 17, 2001 9:43 AM
To:	O'Gorman, Karon
Subject:	Price Quote for New Laptop

The FGT/TW rates and certificates department no longer has a way of dialing in remotely because of outdated equipment.  Robert Barker tells me that the standard minimum on laptops that would enable us to do so is a 266 MHz processor with at least 128 megs of RAM.  Could you please provide an estimate of the costs involved to purchase such a laptop?  In addition, how long does it generally take to receive the equipment once it is ordered?

Also, I have an IBM ThinkPad that can be returned if you will let me know who handles surplus equipment.

Thank you for your assistance.


FYI -  Though Mitch has the  gov't's 4 guiding principles wrong. They are:
protecting consumers, creating a stable business climate, protecting the
environment, and promoting new ways of doing business and alternative
sources  of energy.
----- Forwarded by Aleck Dadson/TOR/ECT on 05/07/2001 09:03 AM -----

	"Optican, Mitchell E." <OpticanM@state.gov>
	05/04/2001 01:21 PM

		 To: "'Aleck.Dadson@enron.com'" <Aleck.Dadson@enron.com>
		 cc: "Santillo, Patrick" <patrick.santillo@mail.doc.gov>, "Dykeman, Peter"
<peter.dykeman@mail.doc.gov>
		 Subject: Today's Meeting

Aleck,

First, thanks for spending time with us this morning.  I think it was a very
worthwhile meeting.

In your thinking about a scheme to satisfy Harris government political
concerns, please consider that the Premier said on May 1 that he is
insisting that before deregulation four conditions will have to be met over
the next 12 months. These are: a guarantee that consumers will be spared
from sharp rate hikes; a reliable supply of power; adequate environmental
safeguards; and continued support for alternative power sources.

I think we need, therefore, to consider how to freeing up the wholesale
market would not cross these four conditions.  For example, deregulating the
wholesale market would not appear to have any negative impact on
environmental safeguards or continued support for alternative power sources.
It may be that such a deregulation would have a positive impact (I noted in
today's WSJ that ENRON and 4 other companies are calling for CO2 caps).  How
could deregulating the wholesale market "guarantee the consumers will be
spared from sharp rate hikes" and "provide a reliable supply of power"?

I think that any plan for reducing market risk that ENRON could suggest (as
you mentioned, Ontario could contract for future deliveries at a set price)
would seem to meet that requirement.  What needs to be clear is the
mechanism whereby this would be done.

If an alternative plan is then contrasted with the consequences of ENRON
pulling out of the Ontario market and the reciprocity repercussions for OPG
in NY, perhaps the Harris government would have the political cover as well
as the incentive to qualify its May 1 statement to include a November 2001
opening for the wholesale market.

best, Mitch


Any problem with this?

Thanks,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/22/2000 08:35
AM ---------------------------
From: Gregg Penman on 11/21/2000 05:00 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Peoples Letter Agreement

Kay - Here is my attempt to turn the term sheet into something executable.  I
have accepted all of William Harmon's changes except for the second paragraph
under amended terms.  William used the wording "The payment late payment
amount is calculated...".  I changed it to "The payment interest on overdue
amounts is calculated..." to be consistent with the reference in the above
paragraph.  I don't think this changes any substance, but I defer to you.  I
think that is all I changed.  I also added a quick intro. and a paragraph on
future payments to reiterate this is only for October purchases.  Neither may
be necessary, let me know.  I am not sure your availability tomorrow, but I
would love to hear from you ASAP in the morning to get this in front of
Peoples for signature.  Russell Diamond is coordinating the internal Enron
approvals with Global Finance, Credit and RAC.

Thanks again for your help on your vacation day.

Gregg


Hey, send them again.  I don't have them.

	From:  John M Singer @ ENRON                           06/30/2000 09:13 AM

To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: EQT Pool

Yesterday I faxed you the forms for establishing a pool on Equiitrans.
Reminder, those forms must be faxed back to Equitrans TODAY to effect a
August 1 start date.
Thanks,
John


Notice No. 00-354
October 13, 2000

TO:
ALL NYMEX MEMBERS AND MEMBER FIRMS
ALL NYMEX CLEARING FIRMS
ALL NYMEX OPERATIONS MANAGERS

FROM: Neal Wolkoff, Executive Vice President

SUBJECT: MARGIN RATE CHANGE

Effective Date: Friday, October 13, 2000 (close of business)

Futures Contracts:
Crude Oil Futures
Unleaded Gasoline Futures
Heating Oil Futures

Contract Months:      All Months

Rate Change:

NYMEX Division Margins on Crude Oil, Unleaded Gasoline,
and Heating Oil Futures Contracts

Effective Date:  October 13, 2000

Clearing Member (Maintenance Margin)     Old:  $3,000     New:  $5,000
Member Customer (Initial Margin)              Old:  $3,300     New:  $5,500
Non-Member Customer (Initial Margin)      Old:  $4,050     New:  $6,750

The margin credit for NYMEX Light Sweet Crude/IPE Brent Crude Oil futures
spread positions will also be increased, from $2,500 to $4,500 (at the
Clearing Member level), as of Friday, October 13, 2000.  The net margin after
the spread will remain unchanged.

NYMEX Light Sweet Crude/IPE Brent Crude Oil Futures Spread
Effective Date:  October 13, 2000
                                                   Clearing Member   Member
Customer  Non-Member Customer
NYMEX Light
Sweet Crude                                       $5,000
$5,500                           $6,750
Less: NYMEX Light
Sweet/IPE Brent Crude
Spread Credit                                     $4,500
$4,950                           $6,075
Net Spread Margin                             $500
$550                             $675
Should you have any questions regarding these changes, please contact Artie
McCoy at (212) 299-2928 or Joe Sanguedolce at (212) 299-2855.  This notice
supersedes all previous notices regarding outright margins for the NYMEX
Crude Oil, Unleaded Gasoline, or Heating Oil Futures Contracts and the margin
credit for the NYMEX Light Sweet Crude Oil/IPE Brent Crude futures spread
positions.

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=tana.jones@enron.com&refdo
c=(00-354)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


Attached is the initial draft of the Strategic Energy TF Report.
This report is for your review and comment at the meeting on 10 Jan 01. The
meeting is scheduled from 6:00 pm to 9:00 pm in NYC and 5:00 pm to 8:00 pm
in Houston.
We expect 32 participants.

Please provide comments to the project director Amy Jaffe or the task force
chair Ed Morse.

Please acknowledge receipt. Copies of the draft report will be available at
both video conference sites.

(See attached file: CFRdraftjan10.doc)

R. Jim Sikes
(212) 434-9494
 - CFRdraftjan10.doc


BREAKING NEWS from CNN.com

-- Illinois toddler abducted Christmas Eve found safe in West Virginia.
Watch CNN or log on to http://CNN.com /AOL Keyword: CNN for the latest news.

********** Exclusive CNN Video ************************************
Watch the day's top stories with CNN's Quickcast. This constantly
updated Web exclusive newscast and more CNN video is only available
with RealOne. Learn more: http://www.cnn.com/quickcast/bnews
*******************************************************************

To unsubscribe from CNN.com's Breaking News E-Mail Alert, log on to:
http://cnn.com/EMAIL/breakingnews.html, go to http://cnn.com/email to
sign up for additional e-mail products

(c) 2001 Cable News Network, Inc.
An AOL Time Warner Company

CNN Interactive email id:18341180103262500


<title>Greetings From Lycos Gamesville®</title>

January 27, 2002

The following message was sent to you as an opt-in subscriber to Sweepsclub.com. We will continue to bring you valuable offers on the products and services that interest you most. If you wish to unsubscribe please click on the following link or copy and paste it into your web browser: http://www.sweepsclub.com/r/?i=594320769&m=2555719&a=ea%3ddon.baughman@enron.com.
If any questions or comments email us at Unsubscribe
@sweepsclub.com.

Dear Game Player:

Play FREE games at Lycos Gamesville — the site that awards tens of thousands of dollars in
cash prizes each month.

http://www.sweepsclub.com/r/?i=881981415&m=2555719

Sign up at Gamesville today and start playing for your chance to win up to $10,000.
Your member name and password give you FREE access to Gamesville!

Benefits include:

Free cards, dice, bingo, slot games & more

Real cash winners from all over the world

Perfect for quick breaks at home or work!

Go to:

http://www.sweepsclub.com/r/?i=881981415&m=2555719

Pick a game, start playing ... and start winning.

GOOD LUCK!

Lycos Gamesville®

http://www.sweepsclub.com/r/?i=881981415&m=2555719

"Wasting Your Time Since 1996"™

© 2001 Gamesville, Inc., a Lycos Network site.

All rights reserved.

This e-mail message may be a recurring mailing.


Julian found two more conversations which I will express to you today.  The
conversations took place on August 24 between Julian and Duke's Houston
trader.   If you need to we can play them over the phone to you so you can
hear them before you get the tape on Friday.   Let me know what you would
like to do.


Attached is a draft of the Broker Electronic Transaction Agreement which will
be used to allow Brokers to transact on behalf of their customers.  Please
review the document and give me any comments.  Please pay particuliar
attention to Section 3 Transactions.

Also please note that it will be imperative that broker confirmations are
done each day on Broker Client Transactions to limit the exposure associated
with online transaction broker breakage costs.  The confirmations group will
be responsible for confirming each day and notifying credit immediately of
any discrepancies between Enron and the Broker.   Notification by the
confirmations group will be the only means by which credit will be informed
to shut down broker activity in the case of a transaction that has not been
confirmed and/or verified by the broker.

Thank you


I removed Good Friday March 29, 2002 and Memorial Day May 31, 2004 as
business days
from the Production and Stage databases.

Truong Vu
x 5-3416

>  -----Original Message-----
> From:  Sweeney, Kevin
> Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 6:56 PM
> To: Vu, Truong
> Cc: Wei, Zhiyong; Husain, Karima; Wong, Jeremy
> Subject: FW: Holidays in the outmonths
>
> Per my earlier email.  Please remove March 29, 2002 and May
> 31, 2004.  I have already requested Labor Days per a previous
> emails.  Memorial day would be nice but
> other than May 31, 2004 is not urgent.
>
>  -----Original Message-----
> From:  Jeffrey C Gossett
> Sent: Monday, March 12, 2001 8:09 PM
> To: Kevin Sweeney
> Subject: Re: Holidays in the outmonths
>
> That is fine.
>
>
>
>  << OLE Object: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) >>
> Kevin Sweeney
> 03/12/2001 01:25 PM
> To: Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michelle
> Bruce/Enron@EnronXGate, John Swinney/Enron@EnronXGate
> cc: Matt A Brown/Enron@EnronXGate
> Subject: Holidays in the outmonths
>
> In the Thunderball application, we have a view of the ERMS
> calendars, and look to those calendars to be valid in terms
> of business days versus holidays.  The most critical issue is
> when an averaging period, for global products normally a
> calendar month, start or end date is falling on a  holiday
> that is currently marked on the ERMS calendar as a business
> day.  I have requested that all labor days be removed from
> the calendar since it is the first Monday of each September.
> A couple of others are jumping out as potential issues:
> Memorial Day and Good Friday.  Memorial day is the last
> Monday of each May, and when Good Friday falls in March it
> can fall on or around month end.
>
> If nobody has any issues, I want to remove the following days:
>
> March 29, 2002   Good Friday
> May 31, 2004  Memorial Day
> Labor Days (per my previous emails)
> Memorial Days, in general, as they are the last Monday of each May.
>
> Most other holidays fall within the month and consequently
> are not as critical.
>
> Let me know if there are any issues.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Kevin
>
>
>


Gerald,

Per my voice mail message, I have attached for your review and comment the
termination letters and renewal gas lift gas contracts.  Provide Gerald Nemec
with the updated entity and contact information and he'll complete and sign
off on the termination letters and contracts.  Also, I am sending you via
interoffice mail the termination letter and 2 executable originals for H & D
Operating Company.

Thanks,

Eric Gillaspie
713-345-7667
Enron Building 3886


Thanks for the tip last night!  I called and ragged around my thieving ins.
company this morning and they are going to cough up some serious insurance
for me and Sandra at suuper-cheap pre XXX prices.  Cool.  My only concern at
this point is that my over-insured status may create undesirable incentives
for the little ladies in my life (the dreaded "worth more dead than alive
syndrome"!)  Adios amigo!  DF


Thoughts? Comments?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Gray, Jeff
Sent:	Thursday, September 20, 2001 3:27 PM
To:	Allen, Margaret
Cc:	Shapiro, Richard; Bradley, Rob; Steffes, James D.
Subject:	discussion for Ken Lay..virtual energy markets

Margaret:

Rob asked me to put some ideas together for Ken's luncheon roundtable on October 4.  Perhaps these will help.  I responded to the questions posed in the agenda.  Rick, Jim, and Rob, would you mind looking over this attachment and adding your thoughts?

Thanks,

Jeff


Rick / Steve -

Please check this out and provide some comments.

It currently does not contain a "market price".  That is being assembled now.

Please also let me know when you would like to get this to the CA Governor's
office.

Thank you - Dan


Steve,

Thanx.

Vince


[IMAGE] Forums Discuss these points in the Forums:  Forexnews Forum       Technicals Live Charts Analysis available from: Cornelius Luca   J.P. Chorek   Technical Research Ltd.   Charts & News featuring Standard & Poor's        Interest Rates  US: Japan: Eurozone: UK: Switzerland:   1.75%  0.15%  3.25%  4.0%  1.25-2.25%        [IMAGE]   	 [IMAGE]  GBP Steady After BoE Keeps Rates at 4.0% January 10, 7:00 AM: EUR/$..0.8901 $/JPY..132.31 GBP/$..1.4425 $/CHF..1.6644  GBP Steady After BoE Keeps Rates at 4.0% by Jes Black  At 8:30:00 AM US Dec Export Prices (exp -0.2%, prev -0.4%) US Jobless Claims (exp 410k, prev 447k) US Dec Import Prices (exp -0.8%, prev -1.6%) At 10:00:00 AM US Nov Wholesale Inv. (exp n/a, prev -1%)  Sterling rose to day highs across the board ahead of the Bank of England's rate decision at 7:00 AM, which left rates unchanged at 4.0% as expected. Investors considered the BoE's decision evidence that strong consumer spending was driving growth in the UK. GBP/USD rose more than one cent to a high of 1.4462 from an overnight low of 1.4340, but remained within a channel from 1.4340 to 1.4480. Against the euro, sterling rose to a high of 61.73 pence, but resistance at 61.70 held, which should keep sterling's gains in check. However, follow-up buying in GBP was subdued as markets generally expected no rate cut from the BoE.  The euro also rose to a day's high around 89.35 cents ahead of key Eurozone data today, but fell following a surprise drop in German data. November industrial output fell 1.8% m/m after strong declines in the previous months to bring the y/y down 4.8%. The decline beat the consensus forecast for a fall of 0.2% and was very negative, but possibly not surprising given the amount of attention paid to Germany's manufacturing woes. Nevertheless, the fall is likely to put Q4 GDP at or near 0% and will put the ECB in a bind to cut interest rates in February.   EUR/USD price action continued to move within a channel from 88.70 to 89.50 as it hovers around the key 89.10 level, which marks the 50% Fibonacci retracement of the move from 82.25 to 95.96. Overnight, the pair briefly tested resistance at 89.50, but was rejected. Now, failure to maintain above 89.10/20 would probably call for a test lower to 88.70 followed by 87.60, which marks the 61.8% Fibonacci retracement level of the same move. Moves higher are not seen by the market as indicating strength given the euro's difficulty to remain above 90-cents.  Meanwhile, the yen pared earlier gains despite concerns voiced by Japanese officials today that the yen's slide was too fast. Dealers were quick to buy USD/JPY near the 132.00 level after its recent fall from a new 3-year high of 133.37. PM Koizumi said at visit to Malaysia that Japan was not lowering the yen intentionally and that FX rates should be decided by markets.  However, Malaysian PM Mahathir said he was watching with interest the impact of a yen fall on the Chinese yuan and ASEAN currencies.   Concern over the yen's 10% decline over the past 2 months corresponds with PM Koizumi's 7-day tour around Southeast Asia, which began on Wednesday. Although US monetary officials have expressed a desire to let markets determine FX rates, countries such as China and Korea have voiced concern about Japan exporting their deflation to the rest of the area. Overnight remarks by an official from South Korea's Finance and Economic Ministry that the weakening in the yen could create malaise in other Asian markets, hints that for political reasons Japanese officials are now likely to remain quiet until the PM returns.  Therefore, in the absence of further encouragement by Japanese monetary officials for a weaker yen, a period of consolidation would not be unusual. But any correction in USD/JPY would likely hold around 130-132 dealers say. EUR/JPY rose to a day's high of 118.76 but needs to hold above yesterday's low of 117.50 or it may target last week's lows around 116.90 and the 2-week low of 116.50. Upside is seen capped at 118.75 and last week's 2-year high of 119.71.  Despite the yen's reprieve from further losses, market sentiment remains very bearish. A recent report from the American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research says that JPY will come under further pressure in March once the market realizes that Japan is on the road to default if it does not reflate the economy. The Economic Outlook report contends that the government is expected to incur an unsustainable debt burden of $1 trillion in protecting depositors from the collapsing banking system in March when deposit insurance is revoked and Japanese investors likely make a run on the bank, thereby bringing collapse.  Ex-Japanese Minister of Finance Sakakibara, aka Mr. Yen, also said he sees the yen possibly falling to 150-160 per dollar towards year end. However, Sakakibara warned of possible intervention if the dollar rises above the psychological level of 140 yen. Mr. Yen said that yen weakness would permeate through to other Asian currencies which should gradually weaken vs dollar along with yen. In reference to Bank of Japan policy, he said the bank should keep easy monetary policy including more JGB purchases, but warned that excessive government spending would be ineffective and could lead to a collapse in the JGB market.  USD/CHF surged to 1.6619 after testing a session low of 1.6527 in early European trade. Trendline support at 1.6500 followed by 1.6410 should hold for further test higher, as rumors that the SNB may have been intervening to weaken the franc helped the currency slide to a low of 1.4833 vs the euro as well. The SNB is trying to talk the franc lower as a cheaper franc would boost export prospects and ease the economic pains facing the country. However, the SNB is unlikely to dramatically lower interest rates to do so. Swiss National Bank Vice-Chairman Gehrig reportedly said in an interview on Wednesday that the SNB's next move could be either up or down. This surprise comment caught markets off guard and given that the economy should show flat growth in H2 2002, as well as the central bank's dissatisfaction with the current strong CHF exchange rate.  Meanwhile, markets will be looking for signs of economic recovery in the US and more gains on Wall Street after yesterday's sour finish. The dollar strengthened across-the-board yesterday, encouraged by the rally in the US stock market for most of the day stemming from positive comments from technology bellwethers Cisco and Oracle. Even though the gains in equities dissipated by the close of trading, the greenback managed to hold onto its gains against the majors. But, dealers will watch to see if U.S. markets are getting ahead of themselves in anticipating a U.S. recovery.     	[IMAGE] Audio Mkt. Analysis Takenaka Leaves Little Doubt on Japan's FX Stance        Articles & Ideas  What's Next For the Euro?   A Look Back at 2001, Forex Themes for 2002       Articles & Ideas Forex Glossary   Economic Indicators   Forex Guides   Link Library      [IMAGE]
		[IMAGE][IMAGE] [IMAGE][IMAGE]
		 This e-mail is never sent unsolicited. If you wish to unsubscribe from this or any other Forexnews.com newsletters, please click here .


In case you hadn't seen the new list of House Committee assignments, here it
is.  We will do a more comprehensive analysis shortly including that of the
new subcommittee chairs.  Thanks.

107th Committee Assignments

Agriculture - Larry Combest
Appropriations - C.W. Bill Young
Armed Services - Bob Stump
Banking (Financial Services)- Michael G. Oxley
Budget - Jim Nussle
Commerce- W.J. "Billy" Tauzin
Education and the Workforce- John A. Boehner
Government Reform - Dan Burton
International Relations - Henry J. Hyde
Judiciary - F. James Sennsenbrenner, Jr.
Resources - James V. Hansen
Science - Sherwood L. Boehlert
Select Intelligence - Porter J. Goss
Small Business - Don Manzullo
Standards on Official Conduct - Joel Hefley
Transportation - Don Young
Veterans Affairs - Christopher H. Smith
Ways and Means - William M. Thomas


I was told that I might have not attached the right version so here it is
again.  Sorry for the confusion.  JGM

Dan J Hyvl@ECT
12/21/2000 10:37 AM
To: Eric Wardle/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joan Quick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jesus
Melendrez/Corp/Enron@Enron, Teresa G Bushman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Transaction Agreement  and  Brazos Master Agreement attached

Both of the above documents have been updated.  If any additional changes are
needed, please advise.


Howard - the above meter indicates a daily swing with no one in Volume
Management's initials in OSS.  I need some information for Daren before it
can be determined if a deal should be set up to cover the 089 contract for
11/97 forward.

I've done some research as follows:

1/95 shows delivery on transport contract #012-82269-02-002 (Southeastern
Marketing Co. as counterparty)

1/96 thru 10/31/97 shows delivery on transport contract #012-27182-02-001
(Esperanza Marketing Corp as counterparty).

11/97 thru 12/97 shows delivery on 089-41500-102

1/98 shows delivery on  089-41500-101

No other transactions at this meter since 1/98.

Some questions I need answered are - why was volume allocated to transport
contracts through 10/31/97 and then started to be allocated to the 089
contract later?  Are the transport contracts no longer valid to allocate to
and is that the reason the 089 contract was used?   Or should the transport
contract be allocated to instead of the 089 contract for 11/97 forward?  Each
item indicates a delivered volume, so either a transport  or sale is taking
place.

All the information that is supplied on the UA4 report is need a contract for
9,448 MMBTU.

Since the meter was assigned to someone else during this timeframe before it
was assigned to me, it's difficult to know why the 089 contract was ever used
for allocation and since there are no other records such as deal tickets in
CPR or OSS.

Need help, Stella

Daren J Farmer
12/22/99 07:14 AM
To: Stella L Morris/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: UA4 - Meter 1441 for 11/97 - Falfurrias

What occurred at this point in prior months?  Who was allocated the volume?

D

	From:  Stella L Morris                           12/16/99 06:04 PM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mary M Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Howard B Camp/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: UA4 - Meter 1441 for 11/97 - Falfurrias

Daren - I need your help in resolving this issue.  There wasn't any deal in
OSS for the above reference meter, nor could I find anything in CPR.  The
contract shows 089-41500-102 representing a sale in the amount of 9448.

Thanks, Stella


---------------------- Forwarded by Audrey Robertson/ET&S/Enron on 12/08/2000
10:02 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Ricki Winters                           12/08/2000 08:39 AM

To: Legale Black/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Robert Benningfield/ET&S/Enron@Enron,
Tangie Dykes/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Jamie Lynn/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Ruthe
Newman/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Debra Jasper/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Harry
Woodson/ET&S/Enron@Enron, MaryAnn Locknar/ET&S/Enron@Enron, James
Carr/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Jodie Floyd/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Albert
Hernandez/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Leonard Daily/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Jean
Blair/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Shirley Walden/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Jan
Moore/ET&S/Enron@Enron, John Buchanan/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Raetta
Zadow/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Lynn Blair/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Jean
Adams/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Larry Berger/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Nancy
Callans/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Pamela Carter/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Terry
Kowalke/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Jerry Wilkens/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Sherry
Forbish/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Chris Greaney/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Kathy
Sturr/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Joe Linhart/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Dale
Eldridge/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Martha Cormier/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Beverly
Miller/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Cynthia Rivers/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Linda
Ward/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Kathy Washington/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Ramona
Betancourt/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Draemer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Toby
Kuehl/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Tammy Jaquet/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Maggie
Matheson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Gerry Medeles/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Sheila
Nacey/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dale Ratliff/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Diana
Porter/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rick Dietz/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Karen
Brostad/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Elizabeth Brown/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Zuela
Carter/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Patricia Steele/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Linda
Trevino/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, John Williams/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Esther
Dasilva/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Larry Davis/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Richard
Hanagriff/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Alice Johnson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Alma
Green/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Nancy Bastida/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Alma
Carrillo/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Randy Janzen/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Janet
McDaniel/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Julia White/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Randy
Bryan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Amy Mulligan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Katherine
Perry/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dennis Lee/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Tracy
Minter/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Christine McEvoy/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Keith
Braswell/OTS/Enron@Enron, Josue Vasquez/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Sharon
Brown/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven January/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ava
Garcia/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Deborah Dunten/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Karen
Leslie/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Jeffrey Cochran/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Crandal
Hardy/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Bart Monden/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Robert
Munson/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Bill Swarthout/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Richard
Barry/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Bill Bell/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Margaret
Hall/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Edward Welsh/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Jesse
Alvarado/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Steve Coash/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Michael
Ellington/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Ron Spain/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Christopher
Tracy/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Roy Armitage/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Rodney
Barnes/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Helen Cummings/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Gaynel
Henley/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Mike Bryant/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Michael
Wagoner/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Donald Angeletti/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Loren
Charbonneau/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Byron Reid/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Donna
Sander/OTS/Enron@ENRON, David Velen/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Jodi
Dobrinski/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Thomas Hebert/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Lynda
Laferla/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Galen Coon/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Laura
Giambrone/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Karen Clapper/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Mary
Phillips/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Jack Howard/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Marion
Collins/FGT/Enron@ENRON, James Cramer/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Tim
Cooper/FGT/Enron@ENRON, William Aldinger/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Hilda
Lindley/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Shahnaz Lakho/FGT/Enron@ENRON, James
Studebaker/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Darrell Schoolcraft/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Gary
Spraggins/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Moore/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Steven
Chambers/OTS/Enron@Enron, Faith Reid/OTS/Enron@Enron, Dannis
Bellard/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Donna Scott/FGT/Enron@ENRON
cc: Julie Armstrong/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Audrey Robertson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON,
Candace Williams/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: White Elephant Christmas Luncheon

OK Gang, we will be having the 2nd Annual White Elephant Christmas Luncheon
again this year, on Monday December 18th  at 11:30.  To be included in this
exciting game of chance, you are required to bring a covered dish and a
wrapped gift of $10.00 or less.  These gifts can be gifts of use, or gag
gift.  The same rules will apply this year as last, and that is, you can only
trade your gift twice and your out of the game.

Julia is kind enough to provide the honey glazed ham, plates, dinner ware and
ice tea, which we will have in EB4102. Please bring a covered dish, hours d'
oeuvres or a dessert (keep in mind, we could have a lot of people attend).
She is also extending her invitation to the other departments on this floor,
in hopes they would like to participate.

Julie, Candace and Audrey, could you please forward this on to your groups
within the 41st floor.

See ya there!!!!!!!!
Ricki


The party originally scheduled for Thursday night at Kells has been
cancelled.  The farewell party at OBA tomorrow night will include our phantom
farewell.

Where:  Oba, 555 NW 12th
When:  Tuesday, December 19th, 4:30 pm

Hope to see you there!
---------------------- Forwarded by Mollie Gustafson/PDX/ECT on 12/18/2000
03:49 PM ---------------------------

Mollie Gustafson
12/15/2000 03:41 PM
To: Portland West Desk
cc:
Subject: Farewell Gathering

There will be a farewell gathering on Thursday, December 21, 2000, 5:30 PM at
Kells Irish Pub, 112 SW 2nd Ave.  This is a phantom farewell, to find out who
the departed one is you must come to the party!

Shhhh.....it's a surprise for all!

Hope to see you there!

Mollie

PS. Please don't ask me, I don't like to lie!


Steve,

On Friday 7-13, Rocky Emery left UBS PaineWebber.  We wanted to advise you
of the change and provide you with new contact information for your UBS
PaineWebber account.  Please call at your earliest convenience.

Michael G. Trahan
Account Vice President
713-654-0362
michael.trahan@ubspainewebber.com

David L. Shine
Vice President - Investments
713-654-0396
david.shine@ubspainewebber.com

R. Craig Rathjen
Senior Vice President - Investments
713-957-7040
robert.rathjen@ubspainewebber.com

UBS PaineWebber Inc.
1111 Bagby Street, Suite 5100
Houston, Texas 77002
800-553-3119
713-654-4723 (fax)

Regards,

Michael

Notice Regarding Entry of Orders and Instructions: Please
do not transmit orders and/or instructions regarding your
UBS PaineWebber account(s) by e-mail. Orders and/or instructions
transmitted by e-mail will not be accepted by UBS PaineWebber and
UBS PaineWebber will not be responsible for carrying out such orders
and/or instructions.  Notice Regarding Privacy and Confidentiality:
UBS PaineWebber reserves the right to monitor and review the content of
all e-mail communications sent and/or received by its employees.


Hi Dutch,

My email did not go through to Jeff or John.  Could you please forward it to
them for me?

Thanks,

Kay


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 02/24/2000
05:08 PM ---------------------------

RealPlayer News <news@real-net.net> on 02/20/2000 01:14:03 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Speed Up Your Internet Connection

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
To unsubscribe to this email, please read the information at
the end of this message.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Dear RealPlayer Customer,

We're excited to tell you about an easy-to-use software tool which
will dramatically speed up your Internet connection -- guaranteed.

TweakDUN boosts your connection without adding any additional
hardware to your system. And it is just $14.95 -- a fraction
of the cost of new equipment.

With TweakDUN you automatically experience faster Internet
downloads and smoother streaming with less need for rebuffering,
all without upgrading any hardware or changing your Internet
Service Provider. TweakDUN works with Windows 95/98/NT4 to
change "hidden" default settings and tweak most Network adapters,
including the Windows Dial-Up Adapter. With TweakDUN, data
no longer fragments, so your online experience is as fast as
possible.

You can download TweakDUN risk-free for only $14.95.  If your
Internet connection isn't faster after using TweakDUN, we'll
refund your money, guaranteed. Just contact us within 30 days
for a full refund.

==>  http://www.realstore.com/offers/tweakdun3.html

We are glad to offer these special products to our RealPlayer
customers.   Thanks for your continued support.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
ABOUT THIS E-MAIL

You are receiving this email because you downloaded our
RealPlayer and indicated a preference to receive product
news, updates and special offers from RealNetworks.

To remove your name from future email communications,
simply visit the following URL and click on the Remove
button:
==> http://ml.real.com/mlr/vkamins@ect.enron.com

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

RealNetworks respects your right to privacy online.
Your e-mail address will never be shared with a third
party without your consent. Our privacy statement,
which has been reviewed by TRUSTe, is available at:

=>  http://www.realnetworks.com/company/privacy/index.html

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

RealNetworks(r), and RealPlayer(r) are trademarks or
registered trademarks of RealNetworks, Inc.
Names of third party companies or products listed herein are
trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners.


I agree with Brian.  I recently learned that someone can "hack" into the
emeet site and pretend to be Jeff Skilling (as I discussed with you, Brian,
this morning).  So, we probably should start with that group to see if there
are any gaps in the email system.

I would suggest that someone from Net Works -- Roberto DeLeon or his crew--
would be the appropriate technical support for this endeavor.  I agree with
Brian that the focus should be on the impersonation of the office of the
chairman and not the content of the email itself.

I am happy to assist in any way you would like.

Michelle

Brian Schaffer@ENRON
07/13/2000 10:28 AM
To: David Oxley/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Gina Corteselli/Corp/Enron@Enron, Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kathryn
McLean/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cindy Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: Performance Review Process

David:

 I am less concerned about the substantive comments of the message as I am
about the "forgery" of the ECT OTC mailbox.  Unless Michelle or another
opines differently, I believe it is incumbent upon us to determine who
mis-used that e-mail address.  This is not to say that an employee should be
disciplined for raising complaints; obviously that would be retaliatory in
nature.  And so, if this person had simply left an anonymous voice message or
old-fashioned letter with OTC, I would have no issue.  But, here, this person
has sent a communication ostensibly from ECT's OTC and apparently has access
to do so in the future.  In my mind, that activity must be addressed and
ceased.

 I suspect that it is technologically feasible to determine the source of the
message.  Unless there is objection, I would recommend an investigation
(which my group can do) to determine the author.

Brian

David Oxley@ECT
07/13/2000 09:59 AM
To: Gina Corteselli/Corp/Enron@Enron, Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kathryn
McLean/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian Schaffer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Cindy Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Performance Review Process

Can we discuss below please? Please review message and give me your comments.

Given it is anonymous it's difficult to respond.

David
---------------------- Forwarded by David Oxley/HOU/ECT on 07/13/2000 09:57
AM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Kay Chapman                           07/13/2000 09:50 AM

To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron, David
Oxley/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Nicki Daw/NA/Enron@Enron, Rhonna Palmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sherri
Sera/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: Performance Review Process

This memo went to Corp and Sherri forwarded for us to handle.

Thanks,

Kay

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Sherri Sera @ ENRON                           07/13/2000 09:21 AM

To: Kay Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mary Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Performance Review Process

Kay, per our discussion, here's the e-mail.  You should probably find out who
has access to that ECT Office of the Chairman mailbox and who forwarded this
up to the Corp. Office of the Chairman.  This should be handled with ENA.
Thanks, SRS
---------------------- Forwarded by Sherri Sera/Corp/Enron on 07/13/2000
09:14 AM ---------------------------

Office Chairman on 07/13/2000 08:04:17 AM
To: Mary Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sherri Sera/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Performance Review Process

---------------------- Forwarded by Office Chairman/Corp/Enron on 07/13/2000
08:04 AM ---------------------------

Office of the Chairman@ECT
07/06/2000 10:01 AM
To: Office Chairman/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Performance Review Process

After having lived through another PRC process, it has become exceedingly
obvious that there are several issues that need improvement in the process.
With all our discussions about Communication within Enron, I am now
communicating to your level issues that I have communicated in years past to
other parties without change.

1)  Enron needs to lay out the groundrules in total that will pertain to the
upcoming review period and communicate them in advance of the review period,
not during the PRC process to be applied after the performance has already
occurred and upon which each employee cannot change their behavior for such
review period.  This is only fair to our employees so that they know the
criteria upon which they will be evaluated in advance.

2)  The PRC system needs to be changed whereby any and all people that are
willing to provide input on performance of any individual can be done without
a bunch of red tape.  There is this idea that unsolicited input works within
the system, but it requires too much effort to get throught the hurdles and
it still requires that the supervisor approve such input.  There needs to be
an unobstructed communication line for this input.  The theory of upward
feedback should also be questioned.  I have never been asked to provide input
to my direct boss (President of Houston Pipe Line) in all the years that I
have worked for that position.  Are Managing Directors exempt from this
process?  This issue is also addressed in #3 below in a different manner.
How can appropriate feedback be given if those that work directly with
individuals are not given the opportunity to communicate?

3)  There is still way too much preferrential selection of reviewers in the
process.  There should be set out for each employee a listing of absolute
minimum reviewers (certain people) that must be solicited, depending upon the
job function.  I have seen too many circumstances where the obvious people to
provide input were not even solicited.  There was one individual that
partially worked directly for another during this past review period and was
not even asked for input.

4)  What constitutes an average employee and what that category is within our
PRC definitions is still being debated.  It has been described by several HR
representatives that it is either/and both Strong or Satisfactory.  Neither
one of the definitions describes such performance as "simply doing the job".
Because of such confusion, the reviewers when they provide input do not
effectively and precisely rate the employee.  What we end up with in the PRC
is an over-inflated representation of each employee and the committee has to
pull the entire group back a notch.  With better definitions and
communication to our employees on how to interpret the definitions, it will
give us a better process and set the standards in writing that seem to be
lacking.

Thanks for your listening ear.


PanEnergy purchase: Deal #231758.

Gas in the amount of 271 mmbtus for April 1st was purchased from PanEnergy on
deal # 231758 .
However, scheduling has indicated that they have no sale for that gas on day
one and as a result, it is not pathed in the system.

Could you please review this item and see if it should or shouldn't be a sale
so that Scheduling can either path April 1st or I can dispute the volume
being billed to us by Pan Energy.

This is part of Pan Energy's exchange deal.

Katherine
5-8643
-------------------- Forwarded by Katherine Herrera/Corp/Enron on 07/28/2000
12:57 PM ---------------------------

Carlos J Rodriguez@ECT
07/21/2000 09:37 AM
To: Katherine Herrera/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Thu Nguyen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kristen J Hanson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Howard B
Camp/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Centana Mobil April 00

Katherine

 As I  told Thu before (see below), I did not see any volumes for that deal
in 4/00. I think this volume is some residue that flow from the last day in
March and probably should be allocated to that month. I dont show a deal to
purchase or sell that gas in April. If you have any more questions please let
me know, thanks.

Carlos

Katherine Herrera@ENRON
07/20/2000 03:50 PM
To: Carlos J Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Thu Nguyen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kristen J Hanson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Howard B
Camp/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Centana Mobil April 00

Deal #231758
This brokered gas in the amount of 271 mmbtus for April 1st was purchased
from PanEnergy on deal # 231758
Could you please review this item and see if it should be pathed, so that I
may pay Pan Energy for the gas in question?

Katherine
5-8643
---------------------- Forwarded by Katherine Herrera/Corp/Enron on
07/20/2000 03:43 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Thu Nguyen @ ECT                           07/20/2000 03:38 PM

To: Katherine Herrera/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Centana Mobil April 00

Katherine,

 This is a brokered deal (Buy Deal 231758 and Sell Deal 93472).  This first
day was not pathed, that's why you are missing volume of 271.  Per Carlos
(see below) the deal was not for day one.

Thu
---------------------- Forwarded by Thu Nguyen/HOU/ECT on 07/20/2000 03:34 PM
---------------------------
From: Thu Nguyen on 05/11/2000 04:18 PM
To: Carlos J Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Centana Mobil April 00

Carlos,

 I don't think I can allocate April's volume to March production.  Could you
please extend the deal to April 1 so that I can allocate it.  Thanks

Thu

Carlos J Rodriguez
05/11/2000 08:34 AM
To: Thu Nguyen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Carlos J Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Centana Mobil April 00

Thu, I did not see any volumes for that deal in 4/00. I think this volume is
some residue that flow from the last day in march and probably should be
allocated to that month. If you have any more questions please let me know,
thanks.

Carlos  3-6673

	From:  Thu Nguyen                           05/10/2000 09:31 AM

To: Carlos J Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kyle R Lilly/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Centana Mobil April 00

Carlos,

 There is flow os 271 for 04/01/00.  Deal 93472 was not path for the same
day.  Could you please let me know what needs to be done.

Thu
3-7159


have you sent it to frank?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Postlethwaite, John
Sent:	Monday, December 10, 2001 10:29 AM
To:	White, Stacey W.
Subject:	RE: trader performance for November:

It's already done, unless there is more to do that I am not aware of.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	White, Stacey W.
Sent:	Monday, December 10, 2001 7:59 AM
To:	Evans, Casey; Postlethwaite, John
Subject:	trader performance for November:

Could you have someone put together the trader performance spreadsheet for November?

Thanks,
Stacey
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hayden, Frank
Sent:	Monday, December 10, 2001 9:00 AM
To:	Gossett, Jeffrey C.; White, Stacey W.
Subject:

I've been getting plenty of request for perf reports.   Any chance you guys could send me pnl history by trader for month of November?
Thanks,
Frank


I can make either time.  Just let me know.

Best,
Jeff

	Scott Reblitz@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	05/14/2001 05:48 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich@EES
		 cc: Joseph M Galan/Enron@EnronXGate, Ranabir Dutt/Enron@EnronXGate
		 Subject: Turbine Export Issue

Jeff:  We are going to have a call with OPIC tomorrow to discuss the turbine
export issue and the state of affairs in the California re power.  The two
times that OPIC people are available are 11:30-2:00 and 4:30-5:30 (both times
are eastern standard time).  Does one of these slots appear better for you?
I don't anticipate that you would be needed for the entire time allotted for
the call but I'm sure the OPIC people will have some questions requiring your
knowledge of California.  Attached, please find a summary document we're
working on containing talking points we want to convey to OPIC.  Again,
thanks for your help, Scott


Attached are SUB's Data Responses to Seattle City Light's Data Requests.
These are sent electronically via e-mail due to potential problems with the
Discovery site.

 <<Data Response SL_SP_001.doc>>  <<Data Response SL_SP_002.doc>>  <<Data
Response SL_SP_003.doc>>  <<Data Response SL_SP_004.doc>>  <<Data Response
SL_SP_005.doc>>  <<Data Response SL_SP_006.doc>>

Jeff Nelson
Resource Projects Manager
Springfield Utility Board
Phone: (541) 744 - 3779
Fax: (541) 744 - 2263
e-mail: jeffn@subutil.com

 - Data Response SL_SP_001.doc
 - Data Response SL_SP_002.doc
 - Data Response SL_SP_003.doc
 - Data Response SL_SP_004.doc
 - Data Response SL_SP_005.doc
 - Data Response SL_SP_006.doc


i think you're absolutely right about q/u.  again just a question of when to
put it on.  Seems as if I'm always on the offer of that spread.  yesterday i
had a 4.5 offer all day and i think i got 50 or so.  i can almost leg it
better by buying winter and selling summer and the j/q spread. i would like
to see it widen another penny before stepping in and i think with the
weakness in the winter and relative weakness of cal 2, on any rally that
could happen.

was that you on the q/u/v fly yesterday?


Teco Tap       80.000 / HPL Gas Daily


-----Original Message-----
From: Bhatia, Randy
Sent: Wed 2/13/2002 12:48 PM
To: Scott, Susan M.
Cc:
Subject: FW:

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Holst, Keith
Sent:   Thursday, January 10, 2002 10:52 AM
To:     Bhatia, Randy
Subject:

<< Untitled >> << FW: >> << Untitled >> << Untitled >> << Untitled >> << Untitled >> << Untitled >> << Untitled >> << Untitled >> << Untitled >> << Untitled >> << Untitled >> << Untitled >> << FW: >> << Untitled >> << Untitled >> << Untitled >> << Untitled >> << Untitled >> << Untitled >> << Untitled >> << Untitled >> << Untitled >> << Untitled >> << Untitled >> << FW: >>

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  <jdeleo@tfsbrokers.com>
To: Holst, Keith </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=KHOLST>
Date: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 9:05:35 GMT
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  <davidn@apbenergy.com>
To: 'kholst@enron.com'
Date: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 8:28:03 GMT
Subject:

-----Original Message-----
From:	Eric Fischesser
Sent:	Wednesday, December 12, 2001 3:23 PM
To:	David Neal
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  <tblando@amerexenergy.com>
To: Holst, Keith </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=KHOLST>
Date: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 8:24:34 GMT
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  <TVaughan@prebon.com>
To: Holst, Keith </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=KHOLST>
Date: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 8:22:00 GMT
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  <STouchstone@natsource.com>
To: Holst, Keith </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=KHOLST>
Date: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 8:12:36 GMT
Subject:

 <<Enron price sheet2.pdf>>

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  <tblando@amerexenergy.com>
To: Holst, Keith </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=KHOLST>
Date: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 8:08:04 GMT
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  <jdeleo@tfsbrokers.com>
To: Holst, Keith </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=KHOLST>
Date: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 8:04:09 GMT
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  <STouchstone@natsource.com>
To: Holst, Keith </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=KHOLST>
Date: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 5:23:31 GMT
Subject:

 <<Enron price sheet2.pdf>>

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  <jdeleo@tfsbrokers.com>
To: Holst, Keith </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=KHOLST>
Date: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 5:30:00 GMT
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  <tblando@amerexenergy.com>
To: Holst, Keith </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=KHOLST>
Date: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 3:59:38 GMT
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  <TVaughan@prebon.com>
To: Holst, Keith </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=KHOLST>
Date: Thursday, December 13, 2001 2:13:25 GMT
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  <tblando@amerexenergy.com>
To: Holst, Keith </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=KHOLST>
Date: Thursday, December 13, 2001 3:52:58 GMT
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  <jdeleo@tfsbrokers.com>
To: Holst, Keith </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=KHOLST>
Date: Thursday, December 13, 2001 4:08:34 GMT
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  <davidn@apbenergy.com>
To: 'kholst@enron.com'
Date: Thursday, December 13, 2001 5:24:05 GMT
Subject:

-----Original Message-----
From:	Eric Fischesser
Sent:	Thursday, December 13, 2001 12:13 PM
To:	David Neal
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  <tblando@amerexenergy.com>
To: Holst, Keith </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=KHOLST>
Date: Thursday, December 13, 2001 9:14:45 GMT
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  <jdeleo@tfsbrokers.com>
To: Holst, Keith </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=KHOLST>
Date: Thursday, December 13, 2001 9:55:01 GMT
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  <TVaughan@prebon.com>
To: Holst, Keith </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=KHOLST>
Date: Friday, December 14, 2001 1:54:44 GMT
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  <jdeleo@tfsbrokers.com>
To: Holst, Keith </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=KHOLST>
Date: Friday, December 14, 2001 3:57:10 GMT
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  <tblando@amerexenergy.com>
To: Holst, Keith </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=KHOLST>
Date: Friday, December 14, 2001 4:35:21 GMT
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  <tblando@amerexenergy.com>
To: Holst, Keith </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=KHOLST>
Date: Friday, December 14, 2001 4:50:50 GMT
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  <jdeleo@tfsbrokers.com>
To: Holst, Keith </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=KHOLST>
Date: Friday, December 14, 2001 7:45:43 GMT
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  <TVaughan@prebon.com>
To: Holst, Keith </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=KHOLST>
Date: Monday, December 17, 2001 2:00:45 GMT
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  <tblando@amerexenergy.com>
To: Holst, Keith </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=KHOLST>
Date: Tuesday, January 8, 2002 4:44:30 GMT
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  <jdeleo@tfsbrokers.com>
To: Holst, Keith </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=KHOLST>
Date: Tuesday, January 8, 2002 8:03:57 GMT
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  <tblando@amerexenergy.com>
To: Holst, Keith </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=KHOLST>
Date: Tuesday, January 8, 2002 9:02:42 GMT
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  <davidn@apbenergy.com>
To: 'kholst@enron.com'
Date: Tuesday, January 8, 2002 9:57:43 GMT
Subject:

-----Original Message-----
From:	Eric Fischesser
Sent:	Tuesday, January 08, 2002 4:53 PM
To:	David Neal
Subject:


Thank you for your message. The credit card I want to use is currently stored
in your system. When I want to update the billing information with this card
number, I am getting the answer: Credit card already in use. The card is in
good standing and there is absolutely no problem with this card and there was
never any problem. I don't understand why your system failed. I think that
this is your problem, not mine.

DISCOVER
Last 4 digits: 0057.
Expiration: 05/02

Sincerely,

W. Kaminski
P.S. I have just called Discover and was told the account is in pefect shape
(as expected). As I have said,  you must have a bug in your system.


All,

Attached file should be a complete list of enpower NETCO applications.
Please fill it out for your group and summit it to us.  Also you can define a new group of security as well.

There is no need to fill out anything if you happy with the current setup
Reports will be available to everyone as before

Regards,
dluu


The Dumas plant is going to Derhime starting at 9:00 am tomorrow, Friday March 22nd.  They will continue to flow approximately 35,000 dth of raw gas.  They DO NOT have a processing agreement with OneOk at Bushton, but the gas will physically be diverted into the B-Line due to it being raw.

The plan is for them to be down through Tuesday morning at 9:00 am, subject to changes that may extend the time.

Any questions, please call.

Randy Janzen
3-5962


Each month, Ed Glaum with CES in Herndon needs an invoice copy of the BUG
release to CES.  Please send him the Feb and Mar activity.  His phone number
is 703-561-6472, his fax number is 703-561-7317.

You and I may need to chat.


Kim,
 Have you seen the fax I sent to Amy regarding this deal? It has all the
terms and conditions in it. Let me know if you need me to send it to you
again. Thanks.

Bob Badeer


Mary,
Please be careful of EOL deals.  I got a call on Friday evening about this
deal being changed but you had already left.
It is a deal with Aquila and the volume was changed.  Please check on this
and communicate all changes  to Daren.

Thanks,  Pat


I think the example of when quantities may be subject to transportation and
fuel is when an Operator overpulls at a delivery point and then cashes out
the imbalance, TW could be out the transport and fuel.  For example,

  DP is SoCal/Needles: scheduled volume is 700,000/d
     actual volume delivered is 720,000/d
     imbalance is 20,000/d, SoCal owes TW
     TW collects transport & fuel on 700,000/d (bill on scheduled volume)
     SoCal cuts a check to TW for dollar value of 20,000/d
     TW doesn't collect transport & fuel on 20,000/d
  Payback in-kind doesn't have this problem:
     The 20,000/d transport gets scheduled at Needles, TW collects the
transport & fuel      (bill on scheduled volume), but we physically give
SoCal 20,000/d less on that day

Is this the correct example?  I'm copying Lynn Blair to verify.

Susan Scott
12/06/2000 09:20 AM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Maria Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Glen
Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Darveaux/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lindy
Donoho/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: TW

We did not answer protests to our Order 637 filing.

The gist of PNM's protest in RP00-626 is that we shouldn't be able to charge
a transport or fuel fee for our imbalance netting and trading service.  I
agree with PNM that our tariff language is vague in this regard.  What
exactly do we mean by "no additional cost...unless through the allocation
process, quantities may be subject to transportation and fuel"??   Can
someone help me with this?

Since we really did not want to make this compliance filing anyway, I would
say we probably wouldn't mind if FERC rejected our tariff sheet outright.
However, it's more likely that they will just instruct us to clarify our
language.  Or they could tell us to remove the "subject to transportation and
fuel" provision.  If we want to preserve our right to charge transport and
fuel, it might be worthwhile filing something in the way of an answer.
However, I am going to need some assistance in understanding what the
language means and why we think we can do it, so I can justify it to FERC.
Any comments you have in this regard would be appreicated.

	From:  Drew Fossum                           12/05/2000 05:18 PM

To: Maria Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Glen Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary
Darveaux/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: TW

Should we respond to PNM's protest of the dollar valuation of imbalances
prior to netting and trading?  Did we already respond to this issue when they
filed their protest of the 637 filing?  DF


Hello-
Diana Scholtes  11/08
Enron Sells Idaho
99.50
Mid C

We have term 11/10-11/11/2000

Bloomberg has term 11/13-11/30-2000

please let me know
thanks


FYI.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Wednesday, September 26, 2001 2:31 PM
To:	Kean, Steven J.; Shapiro, Richard; Steffes, James D.; Sanders, Richard B.; Denne, Karen; Palmer, Mark A. (PR); Mara, Susan; Kaufman, Paul; Belden, Tim
Subject:	Dunn and Davis Searching for a New Scapegoat

Probing the 'palace coup'
Electricity: A panel focuses on price hikes and the actions of the ISO president.
September 26, 2001
By KIMBERLY KINDY
The Orange County Register
SACRAMENTOA state Senate committee is set today to start serving 16 subpoenas on electricity producers and officials who manage California's energy grid to determine whether they acted in concert to manipulate energy prices.
The investigative committee, headed by state Sen. Joe Dunn, D-Santa Ana, is focusing on a series of events last fall filled with enough Shakespearean plot twists and intrigue that it has earned a name around the Capitol: "the palace coup."
Lawmakers and consumer groups allege that the events - directed by the man who heads the state's energy grid - fueled the California energy crisis, pushed the state into the power-buying business and helped make billions of dollars for power producers.
The central question behind the palace coup is whether Terry Winter, the president of the Independent System Operator, acted alone when he took steps to remove key price caps designed to limit the amount power generators could charge.
Winter defied his own board and Gov. Gray Davis when he filed a 50-page request to remove the caps, records and interviews show.
"I don't know how these events could have taken place without some concerted effort," said Dunn.
The subpoenas will force those involved, including Winter, to provide sworn testimony about the events to the committee, and to turn over e-mails, personal calendars and memos.
Davis spokesman Steve Maviglio said the governor felt "betrayed" by the actions of Winter.
"The governor believes it was the defining moment, when what was a mounting problem turned into an instant crisis," Maviglio said.
Winter refused comment, referring all questions to the public relations office. ISO spokesman Gregg Fishman said Dunn's committee will find no criminal conduct. The decision was made by ISO upper management with one goal in mind: to keep the lights on. At the time, generators were refusing to sell power in California because of the price caps.
"It was an emergency," Fishman said.
"We had to take action.''
What became known as the palace coup began on Oct. 26 when ISO board members voted for severe restrictions on the amount of money electricity producers could charge for power. The restrictions would drive prices as low as $65 per megawatt - nearly 12 times below the $750 per megawatt limits of seven months earlier.
"They (electricity generators) grinned and beared the $750 price cap, but this new plan by ISO was too much," said Dunn, whose committee has been investigating since March.
"All hell broke loose.''
Records show that on Oct. 31, power generators and electricity traders filed letters with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, demanding that the new plan be killed. The letters, six in all, were sent within two hours of each other and represented dozens of power generators.
"If not removed immediately, the (ISO) price cap will sow confusion in the market, threaten reliability and stifle new investment in generating capacity,'' read one letter written by Duke Energy Vice President William Hall III.
Although there is nothing illegal about the generators acting together to lobby against price caps, Dunn believes the letters and other actions around the same time showed clear coordination among energy officials. He said the main aim of the subpoenas will be to determine whether collusion occurred to "fix" prices, which would violate federal trade laws.
In the Oct. 31 letters, electricity producers told federal officials that if price caps weren't removed it would lead to a collapse of the energy market.
The generators got their way.
The next day, the federal commission killed the new pricing plan. What was left in place was a $250 price cap established five months earlier.
Power producers then turned their attention toward killing that cap, saying they couldn't make a profit even under these constraints.
They began to withhold power from California, and on Dec. 7 the ISO declared its first Stage 3 emergency and braced for blackouts, which were narrowly averted.
What followed the next day is considered by the governor and Dunn to be the pivotal moment of the energy crisis.
Winter, who in his position as president and chief operating officer of the ISO, submitted a 50-page emergency request, asking federal officials to abolish the $250 price cap. Final authority over lifting the cap rested with the federal government.
Neither the ISO board, which had established the price cap, nor the governor learned of Winter's actions until the cap had been removed. In fact, the attorney who helped draft the emergency request, Charles Robinson, was in a meeting with representatives of the governor and ISO board members just hours before the filing was made. He didn't mention anything about it.
"In retrospect, we should have told them,'' Robinson said.
With the price caps gone, the generators filed paperwork with federal regulators justifying higher costs.
"The ISO staff sat in a meeting with the governor's key energy advisers with poker faces, not saying a word about something that was going on at the exact same moment,'' Maviglio said. "It was beyond belief that they failed to mention something so significant. This action accelerated the utilities' move toward bankruptcy and forced the governor to move the state into the power-buying business."
Prices for electricity jumped from an average of $249 a megawatt to $700 a megawatt within three days, ISO records show.
Dunn believes the resulting overcharges for electricity exceeded $30 billion.
Robinson said the filing - granted two hours after the request - helped rather than hurt Californians. Prices, he said, did not spike as a result. Instead they followed the skyrocketing price of natural gas - which is used to run power plants to generate electricity.
Robinson said the emergency order allowed the ISO to secure refunds should overcharges for electricity be proven to federal officials.
"We believe the action we took addressed a severe concern,'' Robinson said. "In our view, we did not believe we changed or made worse the financial situation. We felt we made it better because it introduced a process for review and refund."
Jan Smutney-Jones, who was the ISO board chairman at the time and executive director of a group that represents power generators, said Winter did not consult him about eliminating the price cap. Smutney-Jones also said he was unaware of anyone in the power-generating community being consulted.
"Terry did this by himself,'' said Smutney-Jones, executive director of the Independent Energy Producers.
"He did what he thought had to be done at the time to keep the power flowing."
The ISO board called an emergency meeting the next week demanding Winter explain his actions. Some board members pushed to have Winter removed, but there were concerns such action would lead to more chaos, the governor's spokesman Maviglio said.
James J. Hoecker, the former Federal Energy Regulatory Commission chairman, defended making the December decision and also defended Winter.
"They filed an emergency motion, and we were not about to let California go dark,'' Hoecker said.
"They (ISO management) did what any independent system operator would do."
What Dunn's committee hopes to learn is why all these events transpired. He believes memos and e-mails around the time of Winter's Dec. 8 actions should provide vital clues.
"We don't know why he did what he did, but we are eager to find out," Dunn said. "Terry said he made that filing in the interest of Californians, but I find that argument has no basis in fact.''


fyi
This "banked" gas can't be recovered. It's Koch's gas now and they purchase
from Devon at reduced price....
 -----Original Message-----
From:  Loocke, Kelly
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 3:21 PM
To: Lamadrid, Victor
Subject: Koch Penalty Gas for Meter 2848

Victor,

I wanted to keep you in the loop of an issue on Gulf South.  I watch these
wellheads very closely and still have managed to accumulate penalty gas on
meter 2848 for May.  I spoke with Victor Haley to alert him as soon as I
discovered this issue and he was looking into it.  The wellhead is flowing
nearly twice as much as normal.  Victor H. was checking to see if another
wellhead has been added at that point.  He still does not have any further
information on that meter.  He is aware of it, does not seem to be too
concerned, and has a copy of the spreadsheet attached.  You will see his
original nom request as 2400 and I moved it up accordingly.

Let me know if you want to discuss this any further.

Thanks!

Kelly M. Loocke
Enron North America
713-853-3570
pager:  713-707-8605


Marie - PSEG has requested a Master Master agreement.  Can you please have an atty forward a template to Cindy Midura.

cynthia.midura@pseg.com
973-430-6643

Ed


The Enron Management Conference will be held Wednesday through Friday, November 14-16, 2001, at the Westin La Cantera Resort in San Antonio.  While the business agenda is still being finalized, there is one thing that is certain ... we want to inject some humor into the event.  The past year has been eventful, and at times challenging, for Enron and its employees.  However, it's not in Enron's corporate fabric to focus on the past.  Instead, we want to look ahead, and even laugh at ourselves.  The Management Conference will provide a platform for just that.

We want to challenge each of the business units to develop and submit a humorous "Home Video" to be presented at the Management Conference.  The video can address any Enron-related topic that your business unit chooses.  However, there are a few rules to follow.
1.) The videos should be no more than five minutes long.
2.) Business units should spend as little as possible on the videos, and no more than $10,000.  Innovision Communications (Beth Stier) has agreed to work with any business unit to help them create an original, inexpensive video.  Innovision can be contacted at 713-446-4424.
3.) The videos should be fun, but not disparaging.  They should adhere to Enron's values of respect, integrity, communication and excellence.
4.)  By Monday, October 15, business units need to notify me of their intention to submit a video.  To avoid duplication, business units will also need to identify a topic they intend to address.
5.) To ensure inclusion in the Management Conference agenda, videos need to be submitted to me by Friday, November 9.
6.)  Awards will be given for creativity and humor.  The first annual, and soon-to-be-coveted, "Enny" will also be awarded for "Best Overall Video."

If you have any questions about the "Home Video" project, please contact myself or Mary Clark.

Terrie James
ph. 713-853-7727
terrie.james@enron.com

Mary Clark
ph. 713-853-7325
mary.clark@enron.com

Good luck and happy filming!
Terrie James


Gary,
We need to add a new book in Tagg.  Kam suggested I send the request to you.
Please call me if you have any questions.  Thanks.

DG    3-9573

---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 06/15/2000
09:27 AM ---------------------------

Ron Nolte
06/15/2000 06:20 AM
To: Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: New Tagg Book

Darron,

Befire a book can be added to TAGG, it has to be added to Global Counterparty.

Attached please find an example of a request that is sent Global
Counterparty.  Once
the book is added to Global Counterparty, an e-mail is sent to Ricky Dang
from Global
and he adds to to TAGG.

Give me a call if you have any questions.

Thanks, Ron

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Darron C Giron                           06-14-2000 03:02 PM

To: Ron Nolte/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: New Tagg Book

Ron,
Please add the following book to Tagg:

 IM-CENT-MID2

If you need any additional information, please call.  Thanks.

DG    3-9573


Here's the H-2 Training insert in pdf format.  I don't have a word file.
Kay, please copy for insert into the execution copy of the Exhibits.

Thanks,

Lee

-----Original Message-----
From: Thompson, Peter J. [mailto:peterthompson@akllp.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2000 3:45 PM
To: Kay Mann (E-mail)
Cc: Kent. Shoemaker (E-mail); Lee. Johnson (E-mail); Brett. R. Wiggs
(E-mail); John. R. Ayres (E-mail); Tim Oxley (E-mail); Ben. Jacoby
(E-mail); Roseann Engeldorf (E-mail); Cheryl. Lipshutz (E-mail); John.
R. Ayres (E-mail); Pipitone, Paul; Cobb, Chris; Taylor, Rob;
michael.storm@ss.ps.ge.com
Subject: Enron South America FacilityAgreement and Exhibits

Attached please find the latest version of the Enron South America
Facility Agreement and Exhibits, as well as a blackline showing changes
from the last version circulated.  The Agreement has only been changed
to show tomorrow's date. Exhibit B-1 has been cleaned up and
placeholders put in for Exhibit H-2.  I will forward an execution copy
to Kay Mann tonight which will incorporate the agreement and exhibits
into one document and will have the copy of Exhibit H-2 attached.

 - Training LM60001.pdf


Gary,

Just a reminder concerning follow-up with The Weather Channel and Energizer
Holdings regarding potential hurricane derivatives.

Additionally, I found the following link which describes Ray-O-Vac's recent
earnings warning.  Among other things, they mention that they had tough
comparisons due to an active storm season the year before.  I believe they
are referencing hurricanes and represent another potential opportunity in my
opinion.

http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20001219/bs/rayovac_outlook_dc_1.html

One more thing, as I mentioned in our conversation, I believe that The
Weather Channel is an ideal candidate for approaching concerning hedging
against a lack of extreme weather of all kinds.  I know that they are
financially "not doing so well" at present due in some part to a lack of
hurricane activity and are now enjoying great ratings due to the extreme
cold.  They may be a hard sell but they are as purely exposed as anyone and
should be worth the effort, especially after the recent story they did on us.

Please let me know how I may be of assistance.

Thanks,

Charlie


If you are not okay with me wiping out your pages 6 & 7 on your turets,
replacing those pages with all of our group on Page 6, and rollover lines on
Page 7, then please let me know.  I plan on having the phone guys make these
changes later this week.

Thanks,
Laura


If you are looking to feed and challenge your faith, visit
Crosswalk.com's Spiritual Life Channel at:
http://spiritual.crosswalk.com
-----------
N E I L   A N D E R S O N   D A I L Y   D E V O T I O N A L
             from Freedom in Christ Ministries

January 12

WITH ALL PRAYER AND PETITION

With all prayer and petition, pray at all times in the Spirit,
and with this in view, be on the alert with all perseverance and
petition for all the saints (Ephesians 6:18).

The mother of one of my seminary students was a psychic. She said
to him once, "Jim, have you been praying for me?" "Of course I
have, Mother." "Well, don't," she insisted, "because you're
disturbing my aura."

I say pray on! We never know completely the effects of our
prayers, but we do know that God includes prayer as part of His
strategy for establishing His kingdom and ensuring our spiritual
victory.

One of the most dramatic deliverances I have observed happened in
a man who was a high priest in the upper echelons of Satanism.
Six months after he was set free he gave his testimony in our
church. At the close of his testimony I asked him, "Based on your
experience on 'the other side,' what is the Christian's greatest
strategy against demonic influence?"

"Prayer," he answered forcefully. "And when you pray, mean it.
Fervent prayer thwarts Satan's activity like nothing else."

What is prayer? It is communication with God by which we express
our dependence on Him. God knows what we need in our battle with
the powers of darkness, and He is more ready to meet our needs
than we are to ask. But until we express our dependence on Him in
prayer, God may not act. In prayer we say, "You are the Lord, not
I. You know what's best; I don't. I'm not telling You what to do;
I'm asking." Prayer is a means by which God guides and protects
His children.

Praying in the Spirit is God's way of helping us pray when we
don't know how: "The Spirit also helps our weakness; for we do
not know how to pray as we should, but the Spirit Himself
intercedes for us" (Romans 8:26). Helps (sunantilambano) depicts
the Holy Spirit's role of coming alongside us in our condition of
human frailty and spiritual vulnerability and bearing us to the
other side of spiritual protection and victory.

Thank You, Lord, that prayer is such a powerful weapon in my
arsenal against the powers of darkness.

-----------
This daily devotional is published and distributed by
Crosswalk.com.  It is written by Neil Anderson at
< http://www.ficm.org >.

You can purchase "Daily in Christ" and other titles by Neil Anderson at
christianbook.com (Christian Book Distributors - CBD).
< http://shopping.crosswalk.com/bye/devo_na >

Additional devotionals are available from Crosswalk.com:
< http://devotionals.crosswalk.com >.
-----------
To read the Current Feature Story from ReligionToday,
go to http://religiontoday.crosswalk.com/CurrentFeatureStory/

For today's complete News Summary from ReligionToday,
go to http://religiontoday.crosswalk.com/CurrentNewsSummary/

-----------
For Copyright Terms go to http://www.crosswalk.com/info/copyright

____________________SUBSCRIPTION INFO_______________________

* You subscribed to Neil Anderson as:
         < jeff.king@enron.com >
* To unsubscribe from this newsletter immediately, click here:
         < http://link.crosswalk.com/UM/U.ASP?A3.14.261895 >
  If that link is not clickable, simply copy and paste it into
  your browser window.
* To change your address:  unsubscribe your old address
  and then subscribe your new address.
* To subscribe, send an email to:
  < SUBSCRIBE-neilanderson@lists.crosswalk.com > or go to
  < http://www.crosswalk.com/lists > for a complete list of
  our newsletters.
* Copyright ? 2001 Crosswalk.com, Inc. and its Content
  Providers. All rights reserved.

____________________________________________________________


Dear Deputy:

I apologize for being so late in getting this information out to all of you,
but here are the stats for this year's Order of Good Cheer Deputy Dinner:

Where: Rancher's Hall, Heritage Park
 1900 Heritage Drive SW

When: Friday, January 7, 2000
 Cocktails 7:00 P.M.
 Dinner 8:00 P.M.

Cost: $30.00 per person for dinner (cash bar - drinks $3.75ea)
 Please invite your significant other

Dress: Casual - sash recommended

RSVP: Please e-mail me (Libby Curry) at lcurry@kineticres.com or phone me at
262-5971 by December 31, 1999. We will need to know if you will be attending,
whether or not you will be bringing a guest and the name of your guest.

Order of Good Cheer Tickets Payment:

Please bring with you a cheque made out to the "Order of Good Cheer" for
$380.00 (10 tickets @ $35.00 plus the price of the dinner) if you are coming
alone or $410.00 if there are two of you.

Hopfully everyone will have a merry Christmas and a fun New Year and we'll
look forward to seeing you on January 7.

Thanks,

Libby Curry and Maggie Timmins


great job!!


THANKS A BUNCH!

"Moore,Denise I" <denise.moore@dhs.state.tx.us> on 11/03/2000 12:05:53 PM
To: ddavis@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Mailing list

Dana,

     Here is a partial list of addresses I had here at work.  I will have to
go home and find the others.  Do you have a fax machine at home?

Denise

 <<SEEDSLAB.WPD>>

They are already set up as labels in WP6.0 and these should be transferable
to Word.

 - SEEDSLAB.WPD


Heidi,

 Per Jim Kuhn @ Belden & Blake, the volumes contracted for for NYSEG
production are as follows:
 APR = 216 DTH/Day
 MAY = 179 DTH/Day
 JUN = 160 DTH/Day
 JUL = 192 DTH/Day
 AUG = 195 DTH/Day
 SEP = 191 DTH/Day
 OCT = 190 DTH/Day

Does CES need these volumes??

BBC has additional volumes for sale for the period Apr/Sep.  They are trying
to seel the gas for the entire period vx monthly.  If you have an idea what
volumes you need monthly for Apr/Oct, I will try to purchase from BBC.
John


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/04/2001 08:24
AM ---------------------------

"Pepe-Robbins, Suzanne M." <suzannepepe@paulhastings.com> on 04/04/2001
05:27:31 AM
To: "Carolyn Campbell (E-mail)" <ccampbell@kslaw.com>, "Kay. Mann (E-mail)"
<kay.mann@enron.com>, "Isabel PARKER (E-mail)"
<isabel.parker@freshfields.com>, "Adrian BOUTEL (E-mail)"
<adrian.boutel@freshfields.com>, "'rhett.jackson@enron.com'"
<rhett.jackson@enron.com>
cc: "Lang, Gregory F." <gregorylang@paulhastings.com>

Subject: Salmon Energy LLC Agreement

"paulhastings.com" made the following annotations on 04/04/01 06:27:38
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NEW E-MAIL ADDRESSES AT PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP

We have changed our e-mail address.  Our new domain name is
paulhastings.com.  In most cases, our address is composed of
conventional first name and last name plus @paulhastings.com.  Here are
two examples: janesmith@paulhastings.com and danjones@paulhastings.com.
If you have any questions, please contact us at noc@paulhastings.com.

==============================================================================
"The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity
to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you
received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the
material from all computers."

==============================================================================

Attached is revised  llc agreement, marked to show changes.? Please feel free
to call me with  any questions.
?
Suzanne
Paul, Hastings,  Janofsky & Walker, LLP
(203)  961-7432
 - Salmon Energy LLC Agreement_vRED.DOC


Go for it!

George Robinson
04/27/99 04:14 PM

To: Larry Campbell/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc: Butch Russell/ET&S/Enron@Enron

Subject: NNG Gomez Water Disposal

I began discussions regarding this issue with Sonny, an employee of Cliffwood
Oil & Gas, operator of the Ft. Stockton Unit Water Station. This is the
outfit that was taking our recovered groundwater. Sonny discussed this with
Cliffwoods' reservoir engineers in Houston and they decided they did not want
to accept this water regardless of permit status due to their concern that
the relatively fresh water may cause calcium carbonate to precipitate in the
disposal well perforations and plug up their well.

Lee Cisneros of 4C Construction, the outfit hauling the recovered water, put
me in touch with Kenneth McIntyre of Stockton Water Inc. Kenneth informed me
that they would accept the water if permit condition would allow it. Kenneth
said they would dispose of the water in one of two wells, their University
165 or RS Pershing Well#1.

This afternoon I discussed the issue of disposal of recovered water with
Doris at the TRC District 8 office. Doris looked up the permit for these two
wells and informed me that they were permitted for produced water only. After
further discussion of the situation she transferred my call Mark Henkhaus,
District 8 Director. Mark said that normally this waste stream would go to an
"oil and gas waste" disposal facility as you had pointed out in our meeting
last week, but suggested an alternative. Mark suggested that I obtain a
letter of no objection from the operator of the SWD disposal well and
transmit the letter with a request for approval from his office to dispose of
the recovered water in the SWD disposal well for a period not to exceed 12
months. He said he will issue an approval for such a request.

I think this will be the most cost effective manner to manage recovered water
over the next few months, particularly if recovery operations continue to
proceed as favorably as they have to date and we can cease active remediation
activities toward the latter part of this year. If you concur, I will obtain
the letter from the disposal well operator and submit the request to the TRC.

Thanks, George


The picnic is a on its way!  This is a family affair so bring your significant other and kids to enjoy the day. Because this is a family affair please remember to act and dress accordingly.

See you all there

jc
x54070


Can you tell me how Mom Tholt is doing?  Is she out of the hospital?  Is she
going to Montana to stay with Mike and Judy?


Click here: Nonnie's Traditional Southern Gift Cakes - Pound Cake and Fresh
Flowers.
Hi Janie,
Above is the site I was telling you about the cakes... I use egreetings for a
few of my friends that have b'days this month plus Frank and my sons have a
funny greeting waiting for them when they get to work...Thanks.
ej


never received a pass word.


A new version of CQG has been deployed to all current CQG users.  When you log out and log back in you may not initially see your saved layouts.
If this occurs, please follow the below instructions to retrieve your layouts.

If you need assistance please contact the resolution center at x31411 and your floor support technician will be able to assist.

Thank You.

Restoring user layouts after upgrades to 275.

once you are logged into CQG

goto SYSTEM
goto Auto Backup user setups
goto Restore from Archive tab
select most recent date prior to current day...... "its format is yyyymmddnn.zip
hit RESTORE NOW button
hit OK


Not interested.


Your message

was delivered to the following recipient(s):

Edmiston, John on Thu, 25 Oct 2001 15:07:12 -0400
    MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:Dallas:DALMXSMB01

 - C.DTF


As mentioned during the fourth quarter, Gary and I would like to begin
regular meetings of our Trader's Roundtable.  The ideas generated from this
group should be longer term trading opportunities for Enron covering the
markets we manage.  In addition, this forum will provide for cross commodity
education, insight into many areas of Enron's businesses, and promote
aggressive ideas.

Each week, we'll summarize commodity trading activity, and provide an open
forum for discussion.  Your input is valuable, and we've limited this group
to our most experienced traders, and would appreciate regular participation.
Our first meeting will be Tuesday, January 9 at 4:00pm in EB3321.

Jeff & Gary


Please plan to attend a meeting regarding TW's Order 637 filing immediately following Steve's staff meeting on Monday, March 24.  We will remain in 39C1 following Steve's meeting to discuss the strategy for resolving TW's Order 637 issues.  FERC Chairman Pat Wood has pledged to get all 637 orders issued by this August so we need to consider what we need to do to eliminate those proposals we no longer want and, hopefully, trade them for deferring segmenting until the next rate case.  Please invite anyone else who could benifit from or contribute to this meeting.


Title: The Spanish Gas Auction: A Precedent for Europe?
URL(s):

http://www.cera.com/eprofile?u=35&m=2811;

***********************************************************************

A SMALL STEP FOR SPAIN, BUT AN IMPORTANT STEP FOR EUROPE

The recent auction of contract gas in Spain represents an early initiative both
to release gas from preexisting long-term contracts and to make it available to
aspiring market entrants. As such, CERA believes it could provide a precedent
for other European markets (and for their regulators) where release gas
programs have not so far been on the public agenda.

*  The Spanish gas release program, as currently devised, will have limited
impact on domestic competition. However, pressure will grow in Spain to extend
the program.

*  By setting a unique precedent across Continental Europe, Spain has signaled
a possible path for the reforms needed on the supply-side to complete the
European gas internal market.

*  The role of credit risk and sovereign guarantees will be critical in any
reallocation or renegotiation of long-term contracts.

**end**

Follow above URL for complete Insight (4 printed pages).

E-mail Category: Insight
CERA Knowledge Area(s): European Gas

***********************************************************************
**************************************************************************************
CERAWeek February 11-15, 2002 - http://www.cera.com/ceraweek

SPECIAL OFFER: Register on-line before November 30th, and a 2-Day Pass
will be upgraded to a 4-Day Pass (maximum $1,800 value).
Day 1: Global Oil/Refined Products;
Day 2: Natural Gas/Global Energy;
Day 3 & 4: Electric Power
**************************************************************************************

To make changes to your cera.com profile go to:
http://www.cera.com/client/updateaccount

Forgot your username and password? Go to:
http://www.cera.com/client/forgot

This electronic message and attachments, if any, contain information
from Cambridge Energy Research Associates, Inc. (CERA) which is
confidential and may be privileged. Unauthorized disclosure, copying,
distribution or use of the contents of this message or any attachments,
in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited.
Terms of Use: http://www.cera.com/tos
Questions/Comments: webmaster@cera.com
Copyright 2001. Cambridge Energy Research Associates


Attached is the revised Core/Non-Core Analysis per our discussion.  We have
updated to include the new CPUC rate schedules for PGE and SCE and a toggle
switch 20- year bond scenario to cover the past utility debt that is the
burden of Non-Core.  Please let me know if you have any questions.  Thanks.

Kortney


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 05/08/2001 04:39 PM -----

	Aparna Rajaram/ENRON@enronXgate
	05/08/2001 04:36 PM

		 To: Kelly Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron, Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice
Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill D Hare/HOU/ECT@ect, Steve Venturatos/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Tom
Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank L
Davis/ENRON@enronXgate, Ken Curry/ENRON@enronXgate, Nicole
Hunter/ENRON@enronXgate, Lesli Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate, Angela Y
Brown/ENRON@enronXgate, Amber Ebow/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Fraisy George/ENRON@enronXgate
		 cc:
		 Subject: Click Paper Approvals, 05-08-2001

Please see attached.

Aparna Rajaram
Ph: (713) 345-4563
Fax: (713) 853-9476
Aparna.Rajaram@enron.com


nice smushing.


As I have discussed with you we must resolve numerous outstanding issues relating to Canada and London.  Let me know when we can meet.


(See attached file: hpl0613.xls)

 - hpl0613.xls


---------------------- Forwarded by Paul Thomas/EU/Enron on 25/09/2001 10:11 ---------------------------
From:	Teresa Mandola/ENRON@enronXgate on 24/09/2001 11:19 CDT
To:	Robert Benson/ENRON@enronXgate, Joe Quenet/ENRON@enronXgate, Robert Stalford/ENRON@enronXgate, Gautam Gupta/ENRON@enronXgate, Paul Thomas/EU/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject:	FW: PJM

Guys:

Bob ask if I could help coordinate a meeting with you to gather valuable input.
Would Tuesday or Wednesday afternoon around 4:00 be an acceptable time ?  If so, we'll be happy to step up and visit with you.

Thanks so much...

T.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shults, Bob
Sent:	Monday, September 24, 2001 11:01 AM
To:	Mandola, Teresa
Subject:	PJM

Teresa,

I was talking to True Quote while in New Orleans and Chris indicated that a northeast RTO was looking at potentially buying there real time system.  I am not sure why they would be looking at the system but suspect that they could use it as a means of communicating with the individual asset owners.  Maybe they would use it to display capacity and prices from the asset owners.  My desire to talk to the desk is to see if they can help me get a better idea of what the RTO's will be doing and to see if they had any ideas on how to structure a deal for the RTO's.  PJM seems to be a front runner in developing solutions for RTO's and has in fact created a company called PJM Tech.  Apparently they came to talk to us in the past.  I have a good contact at PJM but what to clear a meeting with the desk first.

Bob Shults
EnronOnline LLC
Houston, Texas 77002-7361
713 853-0397
713 825-6372 cell
713 646-2126
bob.shults@enron.com


fyi
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 01/26/2001 01:32 PM -----

	Tanya Rohauer
	01/26/2001 01:31 PM

		 To: Kim S Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Thresa A Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Financial Training Meeting

From CRM, I have asked Jay Williams, Brant Reves, Russell Diamond, Veronica
Espinoza, Rudwell Johnson, Darren Vanek, Aparna Rajaram, and Ken Curry to
attend.  I plan to attend as well.  Thanks!

   Kim S Theriot                01/25/2001 04:14 PM

To: Thresa A Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Financial Training Meeting

We are planning a Financial Training meeting next Tuesday at lunch.  This is
the first part of our training sessions on the Financial business. The
training will be facilitated by Brent Hendry.    I wanted to see if there are
any employees in your groups that would benefit from this training.  If so,
please let me know how many people will attend by tomorrow afternoon (Friday)
so that we can plan for proper seating as well as lunch.  Thanks!

Kim Theriot

---------------------- Forwarded by Kim S Theriot/HOU/ECT on 01/25/2001 03:43
PM ---------------------------

Zionette Vincent@ENRON
01/25/2001 10:20 AM
To: Rose Botello/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sharen Cason/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rhonda L
Denton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly Hundl/Corp/Enron@Enron, Evelyn
Metoyer/Corp/Enron@Enron, Melissa Ann Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie
Piwetz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kerri Thompson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kim S
Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Larry Joe
Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jason Fischer/NA/Enron@Enron, Janie Aguayo/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Derek Bailey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Julie Brewer/NA/Enron@Enron, Diane
Anderson/NA/Enron@Enron, Bianca Ornelas/NA/Enron@Enron, Teri
Bonham/NA/Enron@ENRON, Richard Deming/NA/Enron@Enron, Veronica I
Arriaga/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jean Bell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ellen
Wallumrod/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tiffany Williams/NA/Enron@Enron, Celeste
Cisneros/NA/Enron@Enron, Andrea R Guillen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kim S
Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gregory Carraway/Corp/Enron@Enron, Beatrice
Reyna/NA/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Bosse/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mechelle Stevens/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jennifer Blay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cheryl Luster/NA/Enron@ENRON, Heather
Moody/NA/Enron@ENRON, Kathleen Speer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernard
Dahanayake/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Christianson/NA/Enron@Enron, Cynthia
Shoup/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gordon Heaney/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott
Tackett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Linda S Bryan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anthony
Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Georgi Landau/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent Hendry/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Financial Training Meeting

Greetings -

Please plan to attend a meeting to discuss Financial Training...

     Tuesday,  January 30, 2001
              at 11:30am - 1:00pm in EB49c4

   ***Lunch will be provided***

  If you will be unable to attend, please advise.

  Thank You,
  "Z" (Zionette) Vincent, x5-4858