Jewish Haiku It is common knowledge that poetry lovers have been frustrated
by the fact that no poet has chosen to express Jewish themes and feelings in
the haiku style (three unrhymed lines of five, seven, and five syllables
respectively). Filling this gap in poetic literature, David M. Bader has
recently written a book titled Haikus for Jews. Here are a few examples of
his poetry:
Is one Nobel Prize
so much to ask from a child
after all I've done
-------------
Five thousand years a
wandering people - then we
found the cabanas.
-------------
In the ice sculpture
reflected bar-mitzvah guests
nosh on chopped liver.
-------------
Beyond Valium,
the peace of knowing one's child
is an internist.
--------------
The same kimono
the top geishas are wearing -
got it at Loehmann's.
--------------
In a stage whisper
a yenta confides the name
of her friend's disease.
--------------
Jewish triathlon -
gin rummy, then contract bridge,
followed by a nap.
--------------
Scrabble anarchy
after "putzhead" is placed on
a triple-word score.
--------------
The sparkling blue sea
beckons me to wait one hour
after my sandwich.
--------------
Hava nagila,
hava nagila, hava -
enough already.
--------------
Would-be convert lost -
thawed Lender's Bagels made a
bad first impression.
---------------
Today, mild shvitzing.
Tomorrow, so hot you'll plotz.
Five-day forecast - feh
--------------
Left the door open.
for the Prophet Elijah.
Now our cat is gone.
---------------
Now that Koreans
are "the New Jews," the old Jews
can leave for Boca.
---------------
Yom Kippur - forgive
me, God, for the Mercedes
and all the lobsters.
---------------
Hard to tell under
the lights - white Yarmulke or
male-pattern baldness?
--------------
No fins, no flippers
the gefilte fish swims with
some difficulty.
---------------
Yenta. Shmeer. Gevalt.
Shlemiel. Shlimazl. Tochis.
Oy! To be fluent!
---------------
Hey! Get back indoors!
Whatever you were doing
could put an eye out.
--------------
Firefly steals into
the night just like my former
partner, that gonif.
--------------
Look, Beryl! I've found
the most splendid tchochke for
our Chanukah bush.
--------------
Testing the warm milk
on her wrist, she beams - nice, but
her son is forty.
-------------
Lovely nose ring -
excuse me while I put my
head in the oven.
--------------
After the warm rain,
the sweet scent of camellias.
Did you wipe your feet?
--------------
Wet moss on the old
stone path - flat on my back, I
ponder whom to sue.
--------------
The long pilgrimage
to the venerable shrine -
Leonard's of Great Neck.
---------------
Quietly murmured
at Saturday services,
Yanks 5, Red Sox 3.

The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the
personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. This message
may be an attorney-client communication and/or work product and as such is
privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in
error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this
message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in
error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, and delete the original
message.


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 01/08/2001 02:03 PM
---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Ronald Carroll" <rcarroll@bracepatt.com>
01/08/2001 12:24 PM

To: <Susan.J.Mara@enron.com>
cc: "Jeffrey Watkiss" <dwatkiss@bracepatt.com>, <gfergus@brobeck.com>,
<Alan.Comnes@enron.com>, <Donna.Fulton@enron.com>,
<James.D.Steffes@enron.com>, <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>,
<Joe.Hartsoe@enron.com>, <Mary.Hain@enron.com>,
<Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com>, <Sarah.Novosel@enron.com>
Subject: Re: FERC REFUNDS ***** Restructuring Today, Monday January 8, 2001

PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL
ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGE
ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT

Sue,

I noticed Hoecker's statement too.  I do not, however, believe that he is
breaking new legal ground here, although the reference to Section 309 is (I
believe) the first time in these cases that FERC or any of the individual
Commissioners cited specifically to this section of the FPA as possible
authority for ordering retroactive refunds prior to the 10/2/00 "refund
effective date."  (I have attached Hoecker's opinion; the reference to
Section 309 is on page 11.)

Section 309 is the provision of the FPA that grants FERC authority to take
action "necessary and proper" to carry out the other substantive provisions
of the Act, such as ensuring "just and reasonable" rates under Section 206 of
the Federal Power Act; however, the courts have interpreted Sec. 309 as not
expanding FERC's substantive authority otherwise granted under other
provisions of the Act; it only provides FERC with authority as necessary for
it to fill in the "missing blanks" in the substantive provisions of the Act,
such as Sec. 206.)

Several years ago, FERC ordered retroactive refunds in a Washington Water
Power case where the utility had violated its tariff.  Here, Hoecker is
simply suggesting that FERC could do the same if it turns out that any seller
violated the ISO's or PX's tariff last summer by engaging in "collusion,
predatory pricing, or unlawful manipulation of prices."  As long as EPMI
followed  the ISO's and PX's market rules last summer, I see nothing in
Hoecker's opinion that undermines our view that the filed rate doctrine
prevents refunds of all amounts collected in accordance with the market rules
prior to 10/2/00; i.e., in the absence of a violation of the tariff or FPA,
nothing in Hoecker's opinion suggests that Sec. 309 modifies the prohibition
of Sec. 206 against retroactive refunds prior to the refund effective date
(10/2/00).

Ron

>>> <Susan.J.Mara@enron.com> 01/08/01 02:23PM >>>
Dan and/or Ron,

Hoecker is quoted here as saying (p.2) that FERC has all the authority it
needs to "disgorge" profits under Section 309 of the FPA.  What are your
thoughts?  Is this the first time that section has been mentioned?

Sue
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 01/08/2001 10:49 AM -----

                    US Publishing
                    <season@wizar        To:     "RT Reader"
<season@wizard.net>
                    d.net>               cc:
                                         Subject:     Restructuring Today,
Monday
                    01/08/2001           January 8, 2001
                    08:19 AM
                    Please
                    respond to
                    season

(see attached file:  rt010108.pdf)

Thank you,

Season Hawksley
US Publishing
1-800-486-8201
www.restructuringtoday.com
season@restructuringtoday.com

(See attached file: rt010108.pdf)

 - 0136365.01


fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Michael Eiben/HOU/ECT on 03/21/2000 04:18
PM ---------------------------

Gary Anderson@ENRON on 03/21/2000 02:25:52 PM
To: Michael Eiben/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jeff May/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Charlotte Hawkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert E
Lloyd/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary A Hanks/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lauri A Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT,
George Grant/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steve
Venturatos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda F Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: PG&E Texoma Volumes

This is an outside measured volume that we don't receive volumes on until
month's end so systematically, no information equals zero. SPI, the software
vendor for MIPS is investigating all of the rules currently in place for file
transfers, particularly  0 volumes. The only possible solution is to tag all
zero volumes sent in the nightly file process as (i) incomplete. I will let
you know the outcome of this investigation and the monies required to
complete. We may require a work order to complete based on the outcome of the
investigation.

Michael Eiben@ECT
03/21/2000 10:50 AM
To: Jeff May/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Gary Anderson/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON
cc: Charlotte Hawkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert E Lloyd/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary A
Hanks/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lauri A Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, George Grant/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat
Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steve Venturatos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda F
Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: PG&E Texoma Volumes

Jeff/Gary,
 Where is measurement in the process of sending Pipeline Operations more
complete data?  We continue to have this problem at various bidirectional
meters and meter 980071 below is the latest casuality.  When MIPS sends
Pipeline Operations a zero prelim, this becomes the best available number and
overlays the estimate that Gas Control sends us.  When this happens &
scheduling doesn't catch to override the zero, the desk's expense is
understated. This is causing a huge mess for Texas Operations.  What is the
plan to move this up on measurements priority list?  We need an answer ASAP!!

Charlotte,
 At what other meters are we having this problem?

MVE
---------------------- Forwarded by Michael Eiben/HOU/ECT on 03/21/2000 10:30
AM ---------------------------

	From:  Charlotte Hawkins                           03/21/2000 09:54 AM

To: Jeff May/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Michael Eiben/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON, George Grant/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert E
Lloyd/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary A Hanks/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: PG&E Texoma Volumes

I spoke with Romeo D'Souza this morning regarding the on-going problem of
MIPS feeding zeros to POPS when incomplete data is received.

In light of the e-mail below regarding how important it is that we receive
accurate data from MIPS ....  could you please update me on the status of
this correction.

Thank you so much.

Charlotte Hawkins

---------------------- Forwarded by Charlotte Hawkins/HOU/ECT on 03/21/2000
09:35 AM ---------------------------

Lauri A Allen
03/21/2000 09:04 AM
To: Robert E Lloyd/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Acton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Charlotte
Hawkins/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bryan
Hull/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary A Hanks/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: PG&E Texoma Volumes

In reviewing some of the imbalance numbers, I discovered that Valero Texoma
(#71) BAV volumes have not fed into POPS since 3/14 causing an out of balance
at the meter in excess of 500,000mm month to date.  The more critical part of
this problem, however, is that POPS has fed 0 volumes back to Sitara on some
of the HPLC deals.  This means that these purchase volumes (expenses) have
not been picked up in Tom's P&L and are, instead, sitting in UA4.  To the
extent that the purchase prices vary from the UA4 value, the P&L may take a
hit when these actual volumes flow through.

I realize that Kim is out and that you guys are stretched thin, however, a
problem of this magnitude needs to be addressed as soon as it's discovered.
Someone needs to be overriding the 0 volumes so that Sitara is receiving
correct information and the P&L is kept as accurate as possible.

Please give me a call if you have any questions.


what are you doing tonight?


Please review the attached agreement for the Big Sandy Interconnect.  It is very standard.  It is reimbursable.  It has a few blanks that have to be filled in for certain dates that we (or Caithness) don't know just at this time with respect to receiving regulatory approval, in-service date, etc.  Caithness wants this agreement for their prospective equity partners to review for content.

Teb, Lee and Ron, this agreement has not changed since you have last seen it, but I just wanted you to give it one more look.

I would like to email to Kirk (Caithness) tomorrow afternoon.

Thanks, Kim.


Company Sleuth Daily Report
===========================
Company Sleuth is a registered trademark of Infonautics, Inc. (Nasdaq: INFO)
or its subsidiaries.

CompanySleuth has revised its Privacy Policy.  Click here
http://www.company.sleuth.com/priv-acqui.cfm to view the revised Privacy
Policy.

Free Daily Emails delivered right to your
desktop keep you informed on the latest local breaking
business news. Register now to receive you FREE daily
email with today's local business headlines.
http://L90Dm.com/rdr/707/

This is your Personal Company Sleuth Report for Tuesday December 12, 2000.

----------------------
Your Stakeout Companies
-----------------------
Here are the new items Company Sleuth found on your stakeout companies last
night.

Synagro Technologies Inc. (SYGR)
Tech. Trading...................6
To view this company's report, go to:
http://www.company.sleuth.com/index.cfm?ticker=SYGR

mPhase Technologies, Inc. (XDSL)
Raging Bull Msg.................63
To view this company's report, go to:
http://www.company.sleuth.com/index.cfm?ticker=XDSL

Ames Department Stores (AMES)
Tech. Trading...................5
To view this company's report, go to:
http://www.company.sleuth.com/index.cfm?ticker=AMES

Ameritrade Holding Corp. (AMTD)
Raging Bull Msg.................10
Yahoo Msg.......................39
Tech. Trading...................4
News............................3
Rabbitt Ratings.................1
To view this company's report, go to:
http://www.company.sleuth.com/index.cfm?ticker=AMTD

Best Buy Company, Inc. (BBY)
Yahoo Msg.......................37
Motley Fool Msg.................3
Tech. Trading...................5
News............................3
TVAlerts........................4
Rabbitt Ratings.................1
To view this company's report, go to:
http://www.company.sleuth.com/index.cfm?ticker=BBY

Starnet Comm. Intl., Inc. (SNMM)
Raging Bull Msg.................60
CNBC Msg........................1
To view this company's report, go to:
http://www.company.sleuth.com/index.cfm?ticker=SNMM

Company Sleuth Offers
---------------------------
L I K E  M O N E Y ? visit  www.money.net -- the financial community
"sign up today for the first and only Free Real-Time Live Portfolio
Tracker" http://www.money.net/index.cgi?source=infonautics

Charge Offs? No Pays? Slow Pays? No Credit? - NO PROBLEM!
You can establish or reestablish your credit with a brand new MasterCard in
your name. There are NO Credit Checks and NO Credit Turndowns plus
GUARANTEED* Instant Online APPROVAL!
http://L90Dm.com/rdr/294/companys

Establish or Re-Establish your good credit with an Unsecured VISA card from
First PREMIER Bank!

Get a Credit Limit up to $1000 + Cash Advances + Future Credit Line increases
in as little as 6 months!
http://L90Dm.com/rdr/573/Premier_Visa

Click here for a FREE Motorola Pager!
http://www.company.sleuth.com/motorola/motorola.htm

The sales professional is the most important part of any organization!
Stay on top of your game with the free 'just sell' newsletter from your sales
& marketing portal-- justsell.com. To receive these incredible business leads
and a daily update of jobs in your profession, complete the Job Sleuth
registration form and click "Just Sell" in the special offers section.
http://www.job.sleuth.com/register.cfm?refid=3005

Company Sleuth Holiday Edition
-------------------------------------
With the holidays just around the corner, many of us find ourselves setting
goals for the new year - both personal and financial.   Company Sleuth is
pleased to bring to you the Company Sleuth Holiday Edition - a limited
edition, weekly newsletter providing you with helpful information and insight
to help you take advantage of opportunities during this holiday season.
Check out these weekly newsletters at:

For the Person Who Has It All -
http://www.company.sleuth.com/holiday/index.html
Savvy Online Shopping - http://www.company.sleuth.com/holiday/111500.html
Managing Holiday Spending - http://www.company.sleuth.com/holiday/110800.html
Holiday Travel - http://www.company.sleuth.com/holiday/110100.html

About Company Sleuth
--------------------
"(Company Sleuth electronically tracks companies of your choosing on what,s
called the Stakeout List. The Stakeout List includes some obscurities such as
domain name registrations and patents as well as more run-of-the-mill
information such as insider trades, news, and broker reports. The number of
message board postings on a stock is displayed in a chart, indicating whether
the buzz is heating up or petering out. You don,t even need to visit the site
regularly*Company Sleuth will e-mail the results so you can pick and choose
what to read."
- &13 Sites That Put You Above The Crowd8 by Paul Barr, OnlineInvestor,
November 2000

Customize Company Sleuth
------------------------
CompanySleuth has revised its Privacy Policy.  Click here
http://www.company.sleuth.com/priv-acqui.cfm to view the revised Privacy
Policy.

Cancel E-mail
http://www.company.sleuth.com/cancelmail.cfm?userid=ALEWIS34

Contact Company Sleuth
http://www.company.sleuth.com/contact-us.cfm

Change Stakeout Companies
http://www.company.sleuth.com/PickCompanies.cfm

Modify E-mail Content
http://www.company.sleuth.com/tab-alerts.cfm

Change to HTML E-mail
http://www.company.sleuth.com/change-mail-format.cfm

Company Sleuth is a registered trademark of Infonautics, Inc. (Nasdaq: INFO)
or its subsidiaries.
Copyright 2000 Infonautics Corporation http://www.infonautics.com


Vizsla.  I think they are also known as Hungarian pointers, but vizsla is the
official AKC name.

	From:  Kathleen Carnahan                           11/14/2000 03:38 PM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: My fax number

My fax number is:  646-3037.  What kind of dog did you say you have?

Kathleen


Start Date: 4/14/01; HourAhead hour: 4;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041404.txt


New West called to say it had settled with SCE on the PX Credit.  I asked if they agreed to the reduction in the pX credit going forward.  She said that they have no customers buying commodity from them, so it doesn't apply.  I'm guessing this means that they agreed to Edison's proposal, but it has no affect on them.  I asked if they would be supporting SCE's plan at the CPUC.  She said "no".  We'll see.

New Energy and Krogers met with SCE and had the same kind of meeting that we had.  Krogers (grocery store chain) had a Sr management person fly out for the meeting and was incredulous with what he heard.  So far, they are taking the same position we are.

I'll let you know if I hear more.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Thursday, November 08, 2001 12:42 PM
To:	Williams, Robert C.; Tribolet, Michael; Mellencamp, Lisa; Shapiro, Richard; Steffes, James D.; Mara, Susan; Kaufman, Paul; Curry, Wanda; Swain, Steve; Huddleson, Diann
Subject:	Follow-up Meeting w/Edison re: Negative CTC

As we anticipated, today's call did not advance the ball from where we left off last week with Edison.
Edison is sticking to its guns, claiming that all customers, DA and bundled alike, should pay for Edison's undercollection, i.e., they don't owe us money, we owe them money.
The call was short and ended with an agreement that:
	1) we'll both continue plodding along in the PUC process with all the other stakeholders who are arguing over these issues,
	2) we'll keep lines of communication open--to the extend that anyone has any new ideas they want to share, contacts will 	be made, and
	3) if nothing has happened at the PUC by the time Edison starts readying itself to pay people in Q1'02, then we'll get together 	to try to get agreement on a number as the PUC process continues to work itself out.

If anyone has any questions, just let us know.

Best,
Jeff


cataract (KAT-uh-rakt) noun

   1. A large or high waterfall.

   2. A great downpour; a deluge.

   3. Opacity of the lens or capsule of the eye, causing impairment of
      vision or blindness.

[Middle English cataracte, from Old French, from Latin cataracta, from Greek
katarraktes, kataraktes, probably from katarassein, to dash down : kat-,
kata-, cata- + arassein, to strike.]

   "The cataracts blow their trumpets from the steep
   No more shall grief of mine the season wrong;
   I hear the Echoes through the mountains throng,
   The Winds come to me from the fields of sleep."
   William Wordsworth, Ode: Intimations of Immortality from Recollections of
   Early Childhood.

Have you seen the poem about a little girl who, with a lantern in her hands,
goes out in a snowstorm to light the path of her mother coming back from
town? Later, her parents go out to look for her, following her footprints in
the snow when we discover, "And further there were none!" My heart skipped a
beat when I came across those five words. I'm talking about Lucy Gray, a poem
by William Wordsworth ( http://www.bartleby.com/145/ww158.html ), that I read
in my early school days. Later, the emphasis on math and science, and
subsequent studies of computer science in college and grad school, blotted
out the world of poetry. I forgot the name of the poet and other details of
the poem but it has been haunting me ever since. Recently, while researching
some words, I came across the poem again and realized it had never really
left me. Does a poem ever do?

What is it in poetry that moves us so much? Perhaps it is a reminder that no
matter how tough, and worldly-wise we may or try to be, deep inside all of us
have the heart of a child. In this week's AWAD, I'll present words from some
of my favorite poets. Why don't you email me (anu@wordsmith.org ) about your
favorite poets and their poems?                                        -Anu

............................................................................
The first human who hurled an insult instead of a stone was the founder of
civilization. -Sigmund Freud, neurologist, founder of psychoanalysis
(1856-1939)

Q: Some time ago you featured a quote/word about x in AWAD. Could you resend
it?
A: You may search the archives at http://wordsmith.org/awad/search.html
   or browse them at http://wordsmith.org/awad/archives.html All the
   words and quotes since the beginning of AWAD are available there.

Pronunciation:
http://wordsmith.org/words/cataract.wav
http://wordsmith.org/words/cataract.ram


I've changed it to Amerex.

Kerri Thompson@ENRON
05/02/2001 02:48 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: apb checkout

599676
broker says this is not there deal


contact - Joannie Williamson x31769


Let me know if this is what you wanted.


Good Morning Marnie -

I have received the information that I needed to officially submit my request
for 1/2 vacation Friday.  If this is not feasible, please let me know.

Thanks
dd
---------------------- Forwarded by Dana Davis/HOU/ECT on 10/17/2000 09:41 AM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Dana Davis                           10/16/2000 02:45 PM

To: Marnie Lamb/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Vacation

Marnie -

I think I need to take a half day of vacation Friday, Oct. 20th.  I am
involved in some church activities next weekend and I won't find out if I
need this time off until tonight or Wednesday night.  Is that too short of
notice?


Ben,  why are we distributing this?

It is inaccurate and I'm not sure I want it floating around the place.

Regards
Delainey

---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 05/26/2000
08:37 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Benjamin Thomason                           05/26/2000 02:12 PM

To: Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, David Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT, Jake
Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ed Clark/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jim Gilbert/PDX/ECT@ECT, Dean
Russell/SF/ECT@ECT, David Kates/SF/ECT@ECT, Michael McDonald/SF/ECT@ECT,
Laird Dyer/SF/ECT@ECT, Samuel Wehn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rob Bakondy/SF/ECT@ECT, Mark
Fillinger/HOU/EES@EES, Janet R Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mike J Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laura Luce/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian D
Barto/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Brett R Wiggs/SA/Enron@Enron,
Tammy R Shepperd/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cassandra
Schultz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jody Pierce/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan
Badger/LON/ECT@ECT, Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Roger Ondreko/HOU/ECT@ECT,
David Leboe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Raymond Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrew
Kelemen/HOU/ECT@ECT, David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Lisa Bills/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Carl Tricoli/Corp/Enron@Enron, Thomas M
Suffield/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James A
Hughes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Fred L
Kelly/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Dick
Westfahl/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Dan
Shultz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Benjamin Thomason/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Ron Coker/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Master Turbine List

Attached is a master turbine list compiled by CTG of Enron North America.  We
have created this list by compiling information from various developers, and
from accounting and legal groups.  We will be circulating this list monthly.
Please notify us of any needed updates or changes to the master turbine list
as well as changes to the circulation list.

Thank you,

Ben Thomason

CTG Contacts:
Ron Coker  (713) 345-8992
Ben Thomason (713) 345-8802


Sorry, I forgot to send this to you

----- Forwarded by Dan Lyons/HOU/ECT on 09/25/2000 03:27 PM -----

	Dan Lyons
	09/25/2000 03:25 PM

		 To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Talking points regarding "unity of knowledge"

The Disclosure Discussion points, per my response to your earlier email
----- Forwarded by Dan Lyons/HOU/ECT on 09/25/2000 03:24 PM -----

	Heather Kroll
	09/24/2000 04:42 PM

		 To: Dan Lyons/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jeffery
Ader/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ozzie Pagan/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Talking points regarding "unity of knowledge"

To all:

Here are the talking points that need to be addressed during the call with
FCEL that Dave has requested (to establish equal knowledge about the
transaction and status).

Regards,

Heather


Superior	Excellent	Strong	Satisfactory	Needs Improv.	Issues
Directors	Todd Hall		Susan Harrison
			Scott Mills
			Eugenio Perez
			Bob Superty
			Sheri Thomas
			Steve Ventoratos

Sr. Directors	Kristin Albrecht	Mary Solmonson	Brenda Herod
	Leslie Reeves	Sheila Glover	James Scribner

VP		Brent Price	Peggy Hedstrom


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Blair, Lynn
Sent:	Tuesday, September 11, 2001 2:44 PM
To:	Zadow, Raetta; Berger, Larry; Dietz, Rick
Cc:	Blair, Lynn
Subject:	Possible System Changes

	I talked with Mary Darveaux and there are some possible billing changes  coming that
	we need to discuss in the morning.

	1.  There may be a 10 day lag on pricing
	2.  The MPS imbalance volume will be taken out of the tiering denominator
		calculation. (as well as fuel)
	3.  We need to run a report to see how oftern (if at all) we have had imbalances on MPS contracts.

	Do you have any time Wed. morning?  What about 9:00 a.m. in my office?  If that
	doesn't work we can look at tomorrow afternoon.  Thanks. Lynn


get this......he didn't even wake up!  He had no idea that you were there and couldn't figure out how Murphy got out of his room.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Scott, Susan M.
Sent:	Monday, October 15, 2001 12:10 PM
To:	Smith, Matt
Subject:	battle wounds

i sustained injuries from friday night....two minor scratches on my index finger due to the cat, and a sore neck from head banging to limp bizkit....think mo suffered from the neck injury as well....hope your roomie wasn't irritated by the ruckus.


---------------------- Forwarded by Bert Meyers/PDX/ECT on 04/29/2001 08:49
AM ---------------------------

Kalman Gaizler <kgaizler@sempratrading.com> on 04/29/2001 08:17:45 AM
To: "'bert.meyers@enron.com'" <bert.meyers@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Visit

Hi Bert,

I will be arriving in Portland on Thursday, May 17th at 10:30am and I will
be staying at the Westin Portland, 750 SW Alder St.. I would like to stop by
the Enron office on Thursday afternoon at about 2PM and meet the Enron crew.

I would appreciate your help in organizing an outing on Thursday evening.
The outing could be to your favorite restaurant or what-so-ever event that
may be nearby. I hope that you and many of your colleagues will be able to
join me on Thursday, May 17th as my guests.

Also, can you please e-mail me directions to your office.

Regards,

Ken Gaizler
SempraTrading RealTime Desk

****************************************************************************
This e-mail contains privileged attorney-client communications and/or
confidential information, and is only for the use by the intended recipient.
Receipt by an unintended recipient does not constitute a waiver of any
applicable privilege.

Reading, disclosure, discussion, dissemination, distribution or copying of
this information by anyone other than the intended recipient or his or her
employees or agents is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this
communication in error, please immediately notify us and delete the original
material from your computer.

Sempra Energy Trading Corp. (SET) is not the same company as SDG&E or
SoCalGas, the utilities owned by SET's parent company.  SET is not regulated
by the California Public Utilities Commission and you do not have to buy
SET's products and services to continue to receive quality regulated service
from the utilities.
****************************************************************************


Enron has consented to allow the Federal Bureau of Investigation to search the Enron Building and to interview employees regarding allegations of document destruction.  The company encourages all employees to fully cooperate with the FBI.

The company has retained Michael Levy and his law firm Swidler, Berlin, Shereff, Friedman, to advise any employee regarding this matter and to be present with them during any interviews by government investigators.  If you would like to speak with an attorney, please contact Ned Crady of the Legal Department at 3-4558 or contact Michael Levy's office in Washington, D.C. at 202-295-8414 and they will direct you to him here in Houston.


I attach a draft agenda for the first meeting of the Japan Working Group. I
will endeavour to phone each of you prior to the meeting to discuss your
thoughts on the Working Group, including what you want out of your
participation in the Group. I will be in E Power's office in Tokyo this week
if you would like to contact me. I look forward to speaking with you and to
the meeting later this week.

Nick O'Day


All -

O:ERMS is virtually out of diskspace. If you have any large files that can be
zipped or deleted please do so.  We had to delete files last night just so we
could save our p&l's.  We have a program which will show all files over a
certain meg.  and which haven't been used prior to any date of your
choosing.  If you need this please let me know.

Thanks


The person I have been using is David Collins, phone #713-622-5678, ext 123,
fax # 713-622-4370, E-mail d.collins@tjmhou.com.


This  is  a very good snapshot  of the North American  gas market  at  the
moment...fyi..Margaret
---------------------- Forwarded by Margaret Carson/Corp/Enron on 11/07/2000
08:06 AM ---------------------------

webmaster@cera.com on 11/06/2000 05:09:35 PM
To: Margaret.Carson@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Bracing the Storm - CERA Watch

**********************************************************************
CERA Watch: Sent Mon, November 06, 2000
**********************************************************************

Title: Bracing the Storm
Author: N. American Gas Team
E-Mail Category: Watch
Product Line: North American Gas ,
URL: http://www.cera.com/cfm/track/eprofile.cfm?u=3014&m=1409 ,

Alternative URL:
http://www.cera.com/client/nag/wch/110100_16/nag_wch_110100_16_ab.html
**********************************************************************

The record high gas prices of this summer and fall and the questions
regarding supply adequacy for this winter have focused attention on
natural gas far beyond the confines of the direct market participants.
The national media, regulators, politicians, industrial groups, and
consumer advocates have all raised concerns about what will transpire
in terms of prices and availability this winter*and what can be done
about it. These conditions, however, are a culmination of trends that
have been developing in the gas market for five years or more; reversal
of these trends is likely to require more than one season or even one
year. In this environment, prices in the $4.00 to $5.00 per MMBtu
range have become the norm and will be sustained into the winter.
Equally important, further spikes to the $6.00 to $7.00 range cannot be
ruled out.

**end**

Follow URL for complete report.

**********************************************************************
Account Changes
To edit your personal account information, including your e-mail
address, etc. go to: http://eprofile.cera.com/cfm/edit/account.cfm

This electronic message and attachments, if any, contain information
from Cambridge Energy Research Associates, Inc. (CERA) which is
confidential and may be privileged. Unauthorized disclosure, copying,
distribution or use of the contents of this message or any attachments,
in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited.

Terms of Use: http://www.cera.com/tos.html
Questions/Comments: webmaster@cera.com
Copyright 2000. Cambridge Energy Research Associates


Look what I found at jobsearch.monster.com.  I thought this might help you
with your job searching.

http://jobsearch.monster.com/getjob.asp?JobID=11822864
Comments:
Know anyone looking for this?
----------------------------------------------------------------------


Desk	 Short Term Northwest	 Short Term California	 Short Term Southwest
Flow Date	 10/3/2001	 10/3/2001	 10/3/2001	 10/3/2001	 10/3/2001	 10/3/2001	 10/3/2001	 10/3/2001	 10/3/2001
Deal Number	 799806	  	  	 800016
Delivery Point	 Portland General System	  	  	 SP
CTPY	 Portland General Electric	  	  	 CA Imbalance
MWH	 25	  	  	 25
Hours	 off peak	  	  	 OP
Price	 N/A	  	  	 N/A

 	 Short Term Northwest	 Short Term California	 Short Term Southwest
1	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 25.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00
2	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 25.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00
3	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 25.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00
4	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 25.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00
5	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 25.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00
6	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 25.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00
7	 25.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00
8	 25.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00
9	 25.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00
10	 25.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00
11	 25.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00
12	 25.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00
13	 25.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00
14	 25.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00
15	 25.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00
16	 25.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00
17	 25.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00
18	 25.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00
19	 25.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00
20	 25.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00
21	 25.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00
22	 25.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00
23	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 25.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00
24	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 25.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00
Total	 400.00	 0.00	 0.00	 200.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00	 0.00


?
----- : Click and go to http://www.enerfax.com if can not view  properly.htm

?
[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]
																					[IMAGE]

														[IMAGE]

																			Click here for  a daily email link

																Enerfax Daily

																												[IMAGE]

																										[IMAGE]

																																	[IMAGE]
																											[IMAGE]

																								Looking  for a past article or issue. Click here to use Sagewave's  Search.

																							Enerfax  Daily? -? Page  ? -? November 8, 2000

																													[IMAGE]

																											[IMAGE]

																												Enerfax  Daily? -?  Page 4? -?  November 8, 2000 -? ?  Past  Issues Available
on Sagewave

																														[IMAGE]
																												[IMAGE]

																																		[IMAGE]
																												[IMAGE]
																															[IMAGE]
																															[IMAGE]

																									Baker Hughes October 2000 Rig Counts

																									?

																									?  ? Baker Hughes has announced that the international rig count  for October
2000 was 727, up 13 from September and up 162 from  October 1999. The
international offshore rig count for October 2000  was 219, up 6 from
September and up 62 from October 1999. The US rig  count for October 2000 was
1,055 up 44 from September and up 344  from October 1999. The Canadian rig
count for October 2000 was 353  up 39 from September 2000 and up 64 from
October 1999. The worldwide  rig count for October 2000 was 2,135 up 96 from
September and up 717  from October 1999.

																									October 2000  Rotary Rig Counts

																									? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?  October 2000? ? ? ? ?September 2000?  ? ? October 1999
																									? ? ? ? ?  ? ?
																									? ? ? ? ? ? ?  Land? ?OS  Total? Var? ?Land? ?OS Total?  ?Land? ?OS Total

																									Europe? ? ? ? ?39?  ?57? ? 96? ? 1? ? ?39?  ?56? ? 95? ? ?37? ?29?  ? 66
																									Middle East? ?143? ?19?  ?162? ? 4? ? 137? ?21?  ?158? ? 116? ?18? ?134
																									Africa? ? ? ? ?25? ?25?  ? 50? ? 3? ? ?25? ?22?  ? 47? ? ?25? ?13? ? 38
																									Latin America 210? ?55? ?265? ?  6? ? 207? ?52? ?259? ?  161? ?34? ?195
																									Asia Pacific?  ?91? ?63? ?154? ?(1)? ?  93? ?62? ?155? ? ?69?  ?63? ?132
																									International? 508? 219?  ?727? ?13? ? 501? 213?  ?714? ? 408? 157? ?565
																									U.S.?  ? ? ? ? 908? 147 1,055? ?44?  ? 864? 147 1,011? ? 630? 111?  ?741
																									Canada? ? ? ? 348? ?  5? ?353? ?39? ? 310? ?  4? ?314? ? 285? ? 4? ?289
																									N. America?  ?1,256? 152 1,408? ?83? 1,174? 151  1,325? ? 915? 115 1,030

																									Worldwide? ? 1,764? 371  2,135? ?96? 1,675? 364 2,039? 1,323?  272 1,595

																																[IMAGE]

																																	Enerfax  Daily? -?  Page 7? -?  November 8, 2000

																															[IMAGE]

																																Enerfax  Daily? -?  Page 8? -?  November 8, 2000

																														[IMAGE]

																										Revised Columbia Stock Proration

																										?  ? NiSource has revised the proration factor for the NiSource  and Columbia
merger, which closed on November 1st. Under the revised  calculation,
38.944476% of those Columbia shares for which valid  stock elections were
made, rounded down to the nearest whole share,  will be converted into
NiSource stock.? This number was  previously incorrectly reported as
38.8301728%.? The exchange  ratio is 3.04414 NiSource shares for each
Columbia share that is  exchanged.

																														[IMAGE]

																											Financial Summary

																																	[IMAGE]

																						")} TC
																		[IMAGE]

 - blnk.gif
 - img16.gif
 - img17.gif
 - img18.gif
 - img19.gif
 - img20.gif
 - img8.gif
 - img21.gif
 - img3.gif
 - img22.gif
 - img23.gif
 - img24.gif
 - img25.gif
 - img26.gif
 - img27.gif
 - img28.gif
 - img29.gif
 - img30.gif
 - img31.gif
 - id=1381847
 - img32.gif


Start Date: 12/18/01; HourAhead hour: 19;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001121819.txt


[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]	The Industrial Group at Frost & Sullivan invites you to participate in our free analyst briefing series. Don't miss the upcoming session:  North American Light Truck Accessories Forecasts - Primary Research - Competitive Analysis - Emerging Trends  Thursday, January 17, 2002 2 p.m. EST At Your Desk Teleconference Hosted by Frost & Sullivan

  To participate you must reply to this email, indicating your interest.   The research expert and author of the North American Light Truck Accessories Report Service will lead a fifteen minute teleconference about new findings that affect the market, followed by a question and answer session with those interested. Participation is free.     The analyst briefing provides an overview of the industry, market and technology trends, and an analysis by major product segment. Highlights include which accessories are hot, challenges that participants face, and forecasts. Read Critical Decisions for Light Truck Aftermarket Accessories , a free analyst insight (please note if you have not done so already you will complete a free and easy registration to access this article).     For an expedited response, please reply and then indicate your selections: I would like to participate in the free analyst briefing, 2 p.m. EST January 17, 2002. I need to know more details about the free analyst briefing. Please send me free information about the 7986-18 North American Light Truck Accessories Report Service. Tell me about my own fully customizable frost.com client portal. Have my account executive contact me. Consulting  solutions enhance my business strategy.  [IMAGE]    To contact Frost & Sullivan: Email: myfrost@frost.com  Call toll free 877 GO FROST (877.463.7678) Fax toll free 888 690 3329 Visit our website      Please update your contact information if you have not done so already:  Name: Vince  Kaminsky Title: Vice President of Research Company: Enron Corporation Address: 1400 Smith Street  City, State/Province Postal code: Houston, TX 77251-1188 Country: USA Phone: 7138533848 Fax: 7136462599 email address: vkamins@enron.com  To update your information, please respond to this email with any changes.

This message is being sent to you by Frost & Sullivan

If you would prefer not to receive further messages from this sender, please
click on the following e-mail link and send a message with or without
any text:Click here for e-mail
You will receive one additional e-mail message confirming your removal.


Outlook Migration Team@ENRON
	06/07/2001 11:04 AM

		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Teresa G Bushman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michelle
Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barton Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nancy
Corbet/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Eddy Daniels/NA/Enron@Enron,
Angela Davis/NA/Enron@Enron, Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrew
Edison/NA/Enron@Enron, Janette Elbertson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Genia
FitzGerald/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nony Flores/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert H
George/NA/Enron@Enron, Diane Goode/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda R Guinn/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ed B Hearn
III/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary J Heinitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Legal Temp 1/HOU/ECT@ECT, Legal Temp 2/HOU/ECT@ECT, Legal Temp 3/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Legal Temp 4/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Matt
Maxwell/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Travis McCullough/HOU/ECT@ECT, Claudia
Meraz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Mellencamp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Taffy Milligan/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Janet H Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marcus
Nettelton/NA/Enron@ENRON, Mary Ogden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debra
Perlingiere/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Portz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth
Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda J
Simmons/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carlos Sole/NA/Enron@Enron, Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Twanda Sweet/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Van
Hooser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ann Elizabeth White/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alice
Wright/NA/Enron@Enron, Theresa Zucha/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: 2- SURVEY/INFORMATION EMAIL

Current Notes User:

To ensure that you experience a successful migration from Notes to Outlook,
it is necessary to gather individual user information prior to your date of
migration.  Please take a few minutes to completely fill out the following
survey. Double Click on document to put it in "Edit" mode. When you finish,
simply click on the 'Reply With History' button then hit 'Send'  Your survey
will automatically be sent to the Outlook 2000 Migration Mailbox.

Thank you.

Outlook 2000 Migration Team

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------

Full Name: Jeffrey T. Hodge

Login ID:  jhodge

Extension:3-6911

Office Location:EB3878a

What type of computer do you have?Laptop  (Desktop,  Laptop,  Both)

Do you have a PDA?  If yes, what type do you have:Palm Pilot   (None, IPAQ,
Palm Pilot, Jornada)

Do you have permission to access anyone's Email/Calendar? No
    If yes, who?

Does anyone have permission to access your Email/Calendar? Yes.  Legal
Admins.
    If yes, who?

Are you responsible for updating anyone else's address book?  No
    If yes, who?

Is anyone else responsible for updating your address book? No
    If yes, who?

Do you have access to a shared calendar?No
    If yes, which shared calendar?

Do you have any Distribution Groups that Messaging maintains for you (for
mass mailings)?No
    If yes, please list here:

Please list all Notes databases applications that you currently use:None

In our efforts to plan the exact date/time of your migration, we also will
need to know:

What are your normal work hours?  From: 8:00am     To:  6:30pm

Will you be out of the office in the near future for vacation, leave, etc?
       If so, when?        From06/09/01 (MM/DD/YY):      To06/15/01
(MM/DD/YY):


Start Date: 3/8/01; HourAhead hour: 1;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001030801.txt

---- Generation Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: WheelSHAST
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 3/8/01
  UNIT_ID: WSENGY_1_UNIT 4


Attached;is a copy of the;materials;prepared for the 14 June meeting on VP
external hires and internal promotions.

If you have any questions or concerns please contact Gina;Corteselli.

Thanks in advance,

Jackie Martin
713-345-3563
for Gina Corteselli
713-345-3377
Global Performance Management
;
;

;

;


Not critical--if you have nothing better to do, great.  DF

Kathy Ringblom
10/25/2000 02:36 PM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Electric Developments

I was planning to take Halloween off - do you want me to come in for this?


What do you think of this language?

---------------------- Forwarded by Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT on 09/25/2000
10:22 AM ---------------------------

"Keith, Jack" <JKeith@sark.com> on 09/22/2000 10:10:48 AM
To: "Hunter Shively (E-mail)" <hunter.s.shively@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Non-compete agreement

Hunter,

Attahced is a letter agreement by our Branch Manger, Brett Fisher, outlining
our pledge to keep your confidential information from competing groups.  It
would be great if we could get together next week to get your feedback.

 <<EnronNonCompeteTradeing.doc>>

Thanks,

Jack D. Keith
Senior Sales Representative
Software Architects, Inc.
mailto:jkeith@sark.com
(713) 787-0887
(877) 899-9893 Toll Free
www.sarkhouston.com
 <<Jack Keith (E-mail).vcf>>

 - EnronNonCompeteTradeing.doc
 - Jack Keith (E-mail).vcf


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 06/08/2000
08:35 AM ---------------------------

"Sean Mayers" <smmayers@earthlink.net> on 06/07/2000 11:53:31 PM
To: "Smetana, Scott" <ssmetana@kumc.edu>, "Moon, Chad" <moonlaunch@aol.com>,
"Hiatt, Drew" <jhiatt@kumc.edu>, "Giron, Darron" <dgiron@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Fw: Priceless Series .........

----- Original Message -----
From: "corb krmarek" <mtboxer@hotmail.com>
To: <jamesm02@hotmail.com>; <andalee@hotmail.com>; <kthomps@hotmail.com>;
<IYQall21@aol.com>; <tupu77@yahoo.com>; <frodo104@hotmail.com>;
<lucanose@hotmail.com>; <grambocat@hotmail.com>; <mlrust3@yahoo.com>;
<mattymt@yahoo.com>; <mjdubois@msn.com>; <smoothysmoothy@hotmail.com>;
<nschmoll@hotmail.com>; <msierra@u.washington.edu>; <extrasuds@yahoo.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2000 2:00 PM
Subject: Fwd: Priceless Series .........

>
>
>
> >From: "TREVOR LIVESAY" <tlivesay@hotmail.com>
> >To: CJS2830@HOTMAIL.COM, MTBOXER@HOTMAIL.COM, DCDRIVIN@AOL.COM,
> >KATIENEWMACK@HOTMAIL.COM, BCOCHRAN_2000@YAHOO.COM, ANP@DIGISYS.NET,
> >MTMATT@MSN.COM, JASONNEWMACK@HOTMAIL.COM, LOVON@MSN.COM,
KORNICK@SOFAST.NET
> >Subject: Priceless Series .........
> >Date: Tue, 23 May 2000 16:37:11 PDT
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
>

 - Pricelessbeaver.jpg
 - 1priceless.jpg
 - priceless3.jpg
 - PricelessPants.jpg
 - Priceless2.jpg
 - pricelessrevenge.jpg
 - pricelessBJ.jpg


Will do.

From: Barbara N Gray@ECT on 10/25/2000 06:03 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: ABILITY TO SELL GE LM6000

please call Dwight Beech @33934 and advise him of your time schedule and
expertise.....      and your commitment to prepare these matters for
him..........it is my understanding that in the non-binding letter of intent
he wants to get a commitment that the counterparty will not deal with anyone
else for a period of time.......i don't have any more details than that...he
also stated that Ben Jacoby has a "redacted version of the GE AGREEMENT" that
he wants to send out.....since I have no knowledge of the GE Agreement, any
confidentiality provisions therein or elsewhere or of any past practices in
this regard, I hesitate.to express an opinion on this..

I am sorry to hear of you and your son's strep conditions; I hope that you
received medication to alleviate the symptons.
If  Dwight needs something this week please  call Shonnie at31463 ; she can
help meet the needs while you are out......with your expertise on the GE
matters..........................Jeff is not in today and I will be out of
the office from 11:oo on tommorrow and all day Friday  (V&E TRIPLE LUTZ
negotiation) but will be checking voice mail.

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	10/25/2000 03:20 PM

		 To: Barbara N Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: ABILITY TO SELL GE LM6000

I'll be glad to handle it so long as it doesn't have to be done this week, as
I have strep throat (Michael and I got a group rate at the peditricians'
office.)
Who should I contact?

Kay

From: Barbara N Gray@ECT on 10/25/2000 02:44 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: ABILITY TO SELL GE LM6000

do you the time to handle the CA and basic term sheet

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	10/25/2000 02:21 PM

		 To: Barbara N Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: ABILITY TO SELL GE LM6000

Hi Barbara,

I'm on the phone with the GE folks right now, as we have a standing
conference call with them every Wednesday at 130.  I'm familiar with the
people and the contractual terms at issue, and will be happy to discuss it.

Kay

From: Barbara N Gray@ECT on 10/25/2000 11:38 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: ABILITY TO SELL GE LM6000

Kay I received a call from Dwight Beech,who used to do powere-type work....he
is now in a different group.  While in that group he formed a relationship
with individuals at Jones Capital Corp. They have somehow discovered that
Enron has the above mentioned turbines and they wish to purchase 2 or
more......I understand from Dwight that there are restrictions which affect
ENA's right to sell the turbines to 3rd parties and that there may be ways to
structure around these.

Please call so that we may discuss Ben Jacoby has been speaking with Dwight
and wants a basic term sheet AND a confidentiality Agreement.   bng    I
presume from our discussions you are familiar with the GE issues.


_______________________________________________________________

This message and any attachments are intended for the individual or entity
named above.  If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read,
copy, use or disclose this communication to others; also please notify the
sender by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system.
Thank you.
_______________________________________________________________

Thanks for the response.  We had previously received the response regarding
the SPCC plan issue but I had not seen the responses for the Lincoln
facility (although I had received Gleason last week).  Just to confirm what
is outstanding:  The questions relating to all facilities sent on 10/23,
the questions relating to Wheatland sent on 10/23, the questions relating
to LV Cogen I and II sent on 10/23, and the questions relating to the LV
Cogen I and II schedules sent on 10/25.  Please let me know if this is not
consistent with your understanding of what is outstanding.  Thanks.

P.S.  You had also indicated in your 10/25 email that the letter from TDEC
regarding the Subpart GG variance would be faxed to me.  To date, I have
not yet received it.  Thanks.

Benjamin.Rogers@enron.com on 10/30/2000 11:34:03 AM
Extension:

To:   jkmurphy@JonesDay.com
cc:   Don.Miller@enron.com
Subject:  Re: Outstanding Allegheny Environmental Questions

Jane:
I believe we have already sent you the answers to these questions.  They
were sent to Tom Irwin.  Here are some of them again.  The rest of the
answers for the peakers will follow shortly - we are cleaning them up a
little.
Ben

(See attached file: Allegheny Question and Answers - All Facilities 3rd
Batch.doc)

(See attached file: Allegheny Question and Answers - Lincoln version2.doc)
(See attached file: Allegheny Question and Answers - All Facilities 3rd
Batch.doc)
(See attached file: Allegheny Question and Answers - Lincoln version2.doc)

 - Allegheny Question and Answers - All Facilities 3rd Batch.doc
 - Allegheny Question and Answers - Lincoln version2.doc


I bring this Minnesota bill to your attention thinking that it may be one
state that we can point to as moving forward rather than backward as a
response to California.  This bill would absolutely not have moved if
California had not been on the radar screen--for the first time in four
years, the leadership insisted that the caucuses move something out of
committee on energy.

WHile customer choice did not ultimately survive (it got knocked out towards
the end of the committee votes), there was a general agreement by committee
members that MN had to prepare for retail access, but that they needed to get
the wholesale market in better shape in preparation.

By the way, the enviromental community was very very confident that they were
going to get a mandate for a 10% renewable portfolio standard by 2015, and
they were then going to make Minnesota the poster child to promote mandated
RPS across the country.  Their mandate turned into "goals" to be met by
utilities, and they are not happy.

----- Forwarded by Susan M Landwehr/NA/Enron on 05/23/2001 07:02 AM -----

	Susan M Landwehr
	05/23/2001 07:01 AM

		 To: Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mitch
Robinson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Edward D Baughman/Enron@EnronXGate, Christi L
Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Ader/HOU/EES@EES, Mark Bernstein/HOU/EES@EES, Marc
Ulrich/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES, Ajit Gill/HOU/EES@EES, Jeff
Rudolph/HOU/EES@EES, Terri Clynes/Enron@EnronXGate, Oscar
Dalton/Enron@EnronXGate
		 cc: Janine Migden/NA/Enron@Enron, Roy Boston/HOU/EES@EES, Kerry
Stroup/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Robert
Frank/NA/Enron@Enron, Donald Lassere/NA/Enron@Enron, Bill J
Moore/EFS/EES@EES, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Barbara A
Hueter/NA/Enron@Enron, Jennifer Thome/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Minnesota Energy Legislation

Earlier this week the Minnesota legislature passed an omnibus energy bill--SF
#722.  The Governor is expected to sign the bill.  Much of the bill focused
on increasing conservation, helping low income customers, setting goals for
renewable energy development, setting up reliability standards (the unions
had to get something!) etc.  However, there are also some sections that may
be commercially beneficial to us.

The bill streamlines the process for transmission siting, and to a small
degree, makes generation siting a bit easier.  Interconnection standards and
rules for distributed generation (defined as up to 10MW) are required and the
process will begin late this summer.  The munis and coops had a section on
"joint finance" that will allow them to enter into projects with other
parties--this should make it easier for them to do business with us.
Minnesota has approx 120 municipal utilities and over 40 co ops.

There is still outstanding an issue of a personal property tax exemption for
merchant plants.  That provision was transfered to the overall tax bill,
which is still being debated.  We should have a conclusion on the tax bill
late next week.

Please call if you have any questions or would like further info.
#612-339-4599


Jim.  I like your suggestions and suggest the following enhancements:
We should integrate this solution into the CPUC process. ie Keep rate freeze
in effect until the Mar 02.  Make state agency take over as ESP to all
bundled customers at 110% of frozen rate.  This solution keeps the current
Rate Freeze in place and keeps us in the game to not lose our negative ctc.
It also corresponds to your minimal changes goal.  It also puts government
agency in the same place as us in having exposure to negative ctc as us.  It
also accomodates the problem of RFP's taking longer than expected.  It also
solves the liquidity problem immediately and avoids the need for
forbearance.  And furthermore it keeps the utility exposed to bankruptcy
which minimizes their negotiating power.
I don't understand how this proposal addreses what happens with the existing
assets of PG&E.  The worry I have is that PG&E gets to keep 50% of the
benefits of nuclear sales and 10% of the benefits of hydro sales, post rate
freeze.  If we damage 1890, the utilities are now in the drivers seat.
re "ESPs should be able to buy from UDCs at the current weighted average
generation rate from 1/1/01 ) 12/31/02 to serve any competitive load in
California"  This suggest a replacement to AB 1890 which suggests significant
changes.  Would it not be better to say "After the rate freeze, the
government entity would take over the obligations of PG&E and continue them
to the end of 2002.  Such assumption and continuation, would be combined with
the government entity recieving the benefits of  the difference between
market prices and embedded costs of the SCE/PG&E existing generation assets.

Summary of Solution that incorporates these suggestions
Government entity becomes an ESP taking over all customers not served by
another ESP.
Government accepts any ESP's that come back within 3 weeks.
Utilities stopped from selling any additional nuclear, hydro, thermal or QF
generation. (requires change in legislation)
Utilities provide surcharge/credit, for the lessor of 40 years or retirement,
based on the difference between generation COS and market value to all ESPs,
after rate freeze ends (requires change in legislation and settlement).
Government entity, as ESP,  charges Frozen Rate plus 10% until the end of
2002.
Government entity, assures all ESP that they will their costs will not exceed
110% of frozen rate until the end of 2002.
Rate freeze and surcharge continue until the end of March 2002.
Any shortfall of agency would be recovered through a amortization over the
next 15 years with securitization less positive proceeds from auctioning
default provider. (requires change in legislation)
Government commit to building 10,000 MW of generation by summer of 2002
Government commit to allowing emmission constrainted generators to buy
emission credits
Goverment change legislation to allow swift DSM activity

From: James D Steffes@ENRON on 01/11/2001 10:42 PM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark
Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Michael Tribolet/Corp/Enron@Enron, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Alan
Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES, Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES,
Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen Swain/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Travis McCullough/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andre
Cangucu/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Shelia Benke/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Wanda Curry/HOU/EES@EES, Don Black/HOU/EES@EES,
Gordon Savage/HOU/EES@EES, Donna Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, William S
Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Financial Analysis of PG&E and Proposed Terms for Settlement

Attached please find three documents that outlines the economics of LT
contracting necessary for PG&E and SCE.  Also find some thoughts on elements
of a workable settlement.

Call me with any questions.

Jim

Scott Stoness
01/11/2001 05:09 PM
To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Don Black/HOU/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: Treasury (keep PG&E) Solvent Strategy

Great idea.  My strategy was solve the immediate problem of solvency quickly
by getting the government to step in while the rules of the RFP are defined,
then do the auction, but if you think we could go straight to an RFP for
standard offer without going bankrupt, I would be for it.

I believe that we do not have time for an RFP (6 months) so that we should
get the government entity to step in to give us the time.

And auction by rate class would be good but noone would want the large
classes because their rate increase will be higher and they will be less
likely to stay.

Scott

From: James D Steffes@ENRON on 01/11/2001 03:25 PM
To: Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Don Black/HOU/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: Treasury (keep PG&E) Solvent Strategy

What about something different?

If we asked for an Auction by rate class that would allow a different company
to market the default service.  The competitive bids would be used to reduce
the overall undercollection.  So in your ST point #1, replace Government
entity with a Competitive ESP that has paid the most to win that right.

Jim

	Scott Stoness@EES
	01/11/2001 02:39 PM

		 To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Don Black
		 Subject: Treasury (keep PG&E) Solvent Strategy

Solution
Government entity becomes an ESP taking over all customers not served by
another ESP.
Government accepts any ESP's that come back within 3 weeks
Utilities stopped from selling any additional nuclear, hydro, thermal or QF
generation.
Utilities provide surcharge/credit, for the lessor of 40 years or retirement,
based on the difference between generation COS and market value to all ESPs,
after rate freeze ends.
Government entity, as ESP,  charges Frozen Rate plus 10% until the end of
2002.
Government entity, assures all ESP that they will their costs will not exceed
110% of frozen rate until the end of 2002.
Rate freeze and surcharge continue until the end of March 2002.
Any shortfall of agency would be recovered through a amortization over the
next 15 years with securitization less positive proceeds from auctioning
default provider.

Other:
Government commit to building 10,000 MW of generation by summer of 2002
Government commit to allowing emmission constrainted generators to buy
emission credits
Goverment change legislation to allow swift DSM activity


Have I received a fax from ABB?


Actually, just the Corp planning requests.  Thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tran, Agatha
Sent:	Wednesday, October 17, 2001 11:05 AM
To:	Geaccone, Tracy; Sommers, Jeffrey E.
Subject:	RE: EGAS 4th Qtr

Tracy,
Do you want all corp request to come thru to you?  We get many requests that are not earnings related from Corp Development, RAC, investors relations, etc.?  I can also just copy you on schedules that I'm sending out.  Please let me know.  Thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Geaccone, Tracy
Sent:	Tuesday, October 16, 2001 2:17 PM
To:	Sommers, Jeffrey E.
Cc:	Tran, Agatha
Subject:	RE: EGAS 4th Qtr

Thank you.  Stan and Rod are looking to me to coordinate all these new companies we picked up.  Its easier to track if it all comes through one place.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Sommers, Jeffrey E.
Sent:	Tuesday, October 16, 2001 1:23 PM
To:	Geaccone, Tracy
Cc:	Tran, Agatha
Subject:	RE: EGAS 4th Qtr

Okay.

I didn't send Mark anything new as the number I gave him came from our 2nd CE with adjustments for the things transferred in and out of EGAS.

Agatha and I will coordinate with you in the future.

Sommers

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Geaccone, Tracy
Sent:	Tuesday, October 16, 2001 11:29 AM
To:	Sommers, Jeffrey E.; Lindsey, Mark E.; Schwarzbach, Stephen
Cc:	Tran, Agatha; Hughes, James A.; Hayslett, Rod
Subject:	RE: EGAS 4th Qtr

Please make sure your numbers go through me or Stan before we give them to Corp. Corp's request for these things should be coming through me in the future.   Rod and I are meeting with Stan on Monday, October 22.  We would like to discuss your 4th Q numbers then if possible.

Let me know.

Thanks

Tracy

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Sommers, Jeffrey E.
Sent:	Tuesday, October 16, 2001 10:18 AM
To:	Lindsey, Mark E.; Schwarzbach, Stephen
Cc:	Tran, Agatha; Hughes, James A.; Hayslett, Rod; Geaccone, Tracy
Subject:	EGAS 4th Qtr

Mark,

In response to your voicemail this morning, this is EGAS 4th Qtr per the 2nd CE.  It has been adjusted to pull out the items that have been transferred out of EGAS since the 2nd CE  ( Azurix International and South America Merchant ) and the transfer in of European Assets and the Middle East.   This does NOT include EPower which I understand will be transferred from Europe to EGAS in the 4th Qtr.   We are currently working on our 3rd CE and will send you those numbers when we are done.

Sommers  << File: EGAS4thqtr.xls >>


Great work.  Any indication that the publication of the Stanley investigation
is having any adverse effect?
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 11/26/2000 08:56 AM -----

	Richard Shapiro
	11/26/2000 07:53 AM

		 To: Robert Hemstock/CAL/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: Update - Proposed Alberta Power Pool Rule Changes

Great news and congrats!

Robert Hemstock@ECT
11/26/2000 01:19 AM
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Aleck Dadson/TOR/ECT@ECT

Subject: Update - Proposed Alberta Power Pool Rule Changes

Rick,

You will recall Steve Kean participated in a conference call on Nov 14 with
John Lavorato et al to discuss emergency Pool Rule changes that the Power
Pool intended to implement in two days.  We developed a 5 point action plan
to deal with the proposed Power Pool rule changes that would have a
significant impact on the value of Enron's PPA investment in Alberta.
By way of update to Steve, you may wish to brief him that: 1) It appears the
Power Pool will not proceed with the rule change designed to exclude
importers from setting pool price.  They will proceed with dispatch risk rule
changes but we have given input on those too and I am optimistic that Enron
will be able to live with these rule changes, the final wording of which we
should see on Monday, 2) We  have set up a meeting with the Minister of
Resource Development (you, Rob Milnthorp and I will attend) on December 11 to
encourage the Alberta Government to stay the course, and 3) This week we will
finalize our "Lessons from other Jurisdictions" document (that Steve sent me
materials to include in) and will provide it to the Alberta Government and
Power Pool and then follow up with them.

---------------------- Forwarded by Robert Hemstock/CAL/ECT on 11/25/2000
11:52 PM ---------------------------

Robert Hemstock
11/25/2000 11:53 PM
To: Rob Milnthorp/CAL/ECT@ECT, Derek Davies/CAL/ECT@ECT, John
Zufferli/CAL/ECT@ECT, Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: aleck.trawick@blakes.com, dpef@blakes.com, Aleck Dadson/TOR/ECT@ECT
Subject: Update - Proposed Alberta Power Pool Rule Changes

The attached memo provides an update on the status of the Power Pool's
further consideration of the proposed rule changes.  In summary, it appears
the Pool will not proceed with the proposal to exclude import offers from
setting pool price but will recommend a rule that reduces ability of
suppliers to become price takers on volumes that were originally priced too
high to clear the merit order.  I will receive more specifics on the dispatch
risk rule change on Monday.

Regards,

Rob


Please advise
---------------------- Forwarded by Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron on 04/11/2001
02:07 PM ---------------------------

Danny McCarty
04/10/2001 08:47 AM
To: Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Wessex

Stan,
          Now that Enron owns 100% of Wessex, we need to look into whether
Enron Direct could utilize Wessex's customer data base as a new sales
channel, and whether we Wessex could farm-in Enron Direct's invoicing
services (there is certainly money to be saved and /or made here).  Matthew
Scrimshaw (President of EES-Europe) would like to explore these and other
possible synergies in the near future.  Maybe you could schedule an hour with
him when you are in the UK.

Dan


Agree

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Howard, Kevin A.
Sent:	Thursday, November 01, 2001 6:51 PM
To:	Cherry, Paul; Hayslett, Rod
Subject:	RE: Transcanada Questions

Rod / Paul:

I would suggest that we mention that the financing would be secured by the assets of the company but that the final terms and conditions have not yet been determined.  I would rather not say anymore just yet.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cherry, Paul
Sent:	Thursday, November 01, 2001 10:27 AM
To:	Howard, Kevin A.; Hayslett, Rod
Subject:	Transcanada Questions

NNG ( Kent Miller and Dave Neubauer ) is in the process of entering into a Fixed Price Swap with Transcanada Energy Financial Products Limited for 7BCF for the months of June 02 to October 02 and 14BCF for June 03 to October 03. We presently have a guaranty from Transcanada Pipelines in support of TEFP, however it will have to be increased to cover the transaction.  TCPL posed a question about NNG in regard to the 1B of financing. They want to know if the financing encumbers the assets of the pipes and what amount of the financing is attributed to NNG and TW. I did not reply. Please advise as to how I should respond.

Thanks and Regards.


Adam Johnson
EnronOnline
x54877


Morris A. Brassfield
Enron Transportation Services
Senior Director
Operations Support Services
Three Allen Center 3285
333 Clay Street
Houston, Texas 77002

713-646-7006  Business Phone
713-503-1409  Cell Phone


Here's the ticket and the doc.

When you open the ticket; clicj on ENABLE MACROS.


see attached

Alfred Pennisi
Enron Trading Services Inc
520 Madison Avenue
28th Floor
New York, NY 10022
Tel: 212.715.5845
E-mail: alfred.pennisi@enron.com


---------------------- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 03/19/2001 03:52 PM
---------------------------

exchangeinfo@nymex.com on 03/19/2001 03:13:37 PM
To: tana.jones@enron.com
cc:
Subject: (01-95) NYMEX ACCESSc Web Site

Notice No. 01-95
March 19, 2001

TO:
All Exchange Members

FROM:
Neal Wolkoff, Executive Vice President

SUBJECT:
NYMEX ACCESSc Web Site

As of Monday, March 19, 2001, the NYMEX ACCESSc web site will remain
unavailable for the ACCESS session for trade date March 20th.

Please call the NYMEX ACCESS Control Center (NACC) for all NYMEX ACCESS price
information at 1-800-438-8616.

We will provide an update regarding the status of the web site on Tuesday,
March 20th.

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"
http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=tana.jones@enron.com&refdoc
=(01-95)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Neal/HOU/ECT on 10/04/2000 06:08 PM
---------------------------

Paula Harris
10/03/2000 04:47 PM
To: Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: 2001 Margin Plan

Scott,

Here's your 2000 plan.

Scott Neal
10/03/2000 04:29 PM
To: Paula Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: 2001 Margin Plan

Can send you me a copy of the 2000 plan for the East Desk?

Paula Harris
10/03/2000 03:57 PM
To: Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fred
Lagrasta/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris
Gaskill/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: 2001 Margin Plan

As you are already aware, Suzanne Nichole has moved on and I am the new team
reporting accountant for Gas Trading.  I am in the process of working on your
plans for 2001.  Dealiney and Lavarato communicated that 2001 margin plans
are to be initiated by each team and the minimum increase expected is 20%
over each of your 2000 plans.  Please send me your margin expectations so
that I can update the templates and forward you revised copies which will
include your direct expense plan dollars.

Given that the deadline for turning this information in to the Office of the
Chair is approaching soon, please send me your estimates as soon as you can.

Thanks, Paula.


cell number is:  512 3312 but it's enron's phone, so ...

home number is 262 0205 and cooper@llamacom.com should be a good place to reach me.

as for me, i'm very unsure.  I'm still technically a U.S. employee and my visa expires soon,
so I really don't have any idea.

worst case is i take a well-deserved vacation for awhile and worry about the rest later ... :)

cooper

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Wiebe, Chris
Sent:	Wednesday, November 28, 2001 10:14 AM
To:	Richey, Cooper
Subject:	RE:

Thank you very much, Cooper.  I appreciate that immensely, and you probably don't know exactly how much that means to me.

Do you have a cell phone number I could use, if it ever came to that?

What happens to you, if things pan out that way?  Are you able to change jobs up here, or is your work visa void if Enron Canada goes under?  I would gladly do the same for you.

Chris Wiebe
Staff, Data Technologies
Enron Canada Corp.
Phone: (403) 974-6929
Cell: (403) 650-7224
Pager: (403) 212-9989
Pager email: chriswiebe@epagenet.net
Email: Chris.Wiebe@Enron.com

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Richey, Cooper
Sent:	Wednesday, November 28, 2001 10:09 AM
To:	Wiebe, Chris
Subject:

Hi Chris,

I don't know where you're at with things ...

i've been impressed how you've handled both the databases and the people involved with databases and
would be happy to provide you with a solid reference if you ever need one.  please keep this to yourself
as I don't feel this way about many people here ...

cheers :)

Cooper


I apologize. You are not clingy. I guess I was just concerned, b/c I don't
want to repeat what happened last time. That is why I thought we, rather I,
I guess, needed more space. If we start doing things together again right
away, then we start dating again or we have all of the weirdness we had last
time.  I don't mean to come off as having an attitude.
I'm just not terribly strong. I can't switch as fast from dating to friends.
It takes me a while. Meanwhile, I need space to make that adjustment.

I still want to do something for your birthday, because I care about you.
Just understand that it isn't that easy for me.

B.

P.S. Marisha might be my roommate.


Attached is PIRA's latest "API Weekly Comment."

If you have any questions regarding the report's content, please contact
Dr. Gary Ross at (212) 686-6808, email: garyross@pira.com.

Contact Client Services regarding PIRA report distribution and address
changes at (212) 686-6808, email: support@pira.com.

NOTE: Circulation of the "API Weekly Comment" outside a Client's
licensed distribution area is strictly prohibited. Clients that are
unsure of their licensed distribution or require an extension of their
current license should contact their PIRA sales representative, or email
to sales@pira.com.

PIRA Energy Group

 - API122701.pdf


Start Date: 1/25/02; HourAhead hour: 14;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002012514.txt


The following notes are from Ken Smith from State Controller Kathleen
Connell's press conference today:

California State Controller Kathleen Connell held a press conference
today.  Although the Dow Newswire said it would be to disclose long-term
contracts, the event focused on what she believes will be an additional
need for borrowing beyond the energy bonds.

She anticipates an additional $4 billion in borrowing will be needed in
February to meet expected costs.  The borrowing should, she said, be
done as Revenue Anticipation Notes (RANs), short-term notes at a lower
interest rates (about 4%) that must be paid back by the end of the year,
rather than as additional energy bonds.  She categorized the current
budget situation as &the same kind of environment as a bad budget year,8
and said California should maintain at least a 3% reserve.

She did not comment on individual contracts except to say there are 17
different contracts.

Charts her office had prepared showed that $5.136 billion had been spent
on energy purchases through 5/17/01; about 99% of that went to spot
market purchases.  There was also a chart that showed projected
expenditures under the Governor,s plan to be $8.349 billion for the
period January 1-June 1, 2001, with about 89% of that going to spot
market purchases.  How these numbers work together was confusing ) I
checked with a reporter, who said he was also unclear.  I,ll try to get
this cleared up this afternoon.

An easel held a large photocopy of a $533 million check to Mirant, which
is the largest energy check written to date.   More has been paid to
Reliant ) she put it at about 25% of total expenditures ) but &we have
never written a check to Reliant over $500 million8 because of the way
they invoice.

She said the Governor,s financial assumptions for power &do not fit into
the most likely scenario8 and that summer conditions will greatly affect
the actual spending needs.  She noted that DWR estimates it will spend
$9.2 billion through June 30, 2002, although the PUC has only authorized
$7.5 billion.

The other significant announcement was that she plans to use her
authority with the Board of Equalization to hold hearings to determine
whether power plants sold by utilities have been properly assessed for
property taxes.  Apparently, they are still on the tax rolls at previous
rates, but she believes the profits recorded by some generators means
the plants may be more valuable than their current assessments.

A press release was not distributed at the event, although there may be
one issued later today.


I am (belatedly) compiling quotations on the California situation that
effectively make our points from the good or bad guys.  These type quotes can
sometimes be used in presentations.  My first quotation is the Gov. Davis
classic:

                    "If I wanted to raise prices, I could solve this problem
in 20 minutes."  (WSJ, March 8, 2001).

If anyone has some of their own classics, please forward them to me with a
full citation.  I will share what I come up with later on.

- Rob

	Janel Guerrero
	06/10/2001 12:57 PM

		 To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Jennifer
Thome/NA/Enron@Enron, Ban Sharma/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Benner
Ursula/HOU/EES@EES, Rob Bradley/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Elizabeth
Linnell/NA/Enron@Enron, Alan Comnes/Enron@EnronXGate, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Paul
Kaufman/Enron@EnronXGate, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Mary
Schoen/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan M Landwehr/NA/Enron@Enron, Leslie
Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron, Howard Fromer/NA/Enron@Enron, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kathleen Sullivan/NA/Enron@ENRON, Linda
Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tom Briggs/NA/Enron@Enron, Lora
Sullivan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ray
Alvarez/NA/Enron@ENRON, Robert Frank/NA/Enron@Enron, Robert
Neustaedter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Steve Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: information request

Everyone,

Elizabeth Linnell and I are updating the "California Solutions" intranet
site.  I think you'll find it to be a useful resource in the next couple of
weeks, but in the meantime, I am asking that everyone submit to me the
following materials to me asap (this applies to NY, DC, the West and
California):

1) All white papers/briefing books/one-pagers etc. that you have completed in
the past two months.  Documents from external sources that are in line with
our positions are also welcome.

2) Any upcoming conferences/meetings etc that need to be posted on the
calendar.

thanks!


Dear Jason Wolfe:

Thank you for choosing Ameritrade as your discount broker. We have received
your account application and have opened your account.  Through your account
application you requested margin approval.  In determining which customers
will be extended margin privileges Ameritrade considers, among other
criteria, the following information:

- Employment Information
- Financial History
- Minimum Equity Requirements

Our review of your application revealed that you did not meet the requisite
criteria for opening a margin account with Ameritrade.  Based on the
information provided on your account application we will be unable to extend
credit to you through the use of a margin account.  Your account has been
approved as a cash account and you may trade accordingly.

We want to assure you that the information used in making this determination
is proprietary in nature and is for Ameritrade use only.  We have not
reported the fact that you have been denied the privilege of trading on
margin to any credit-reporting agency.

On behalf of Ameritrade, we thank you for believing in yourself and choosing
us as your discount brokerage.  We look forward to providing you the best
possible trading experience.

Sincerely,

New Accounts Department
Ameritrade, Inc.


Start Date: 10/18/01; HourAhead hour: 13;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.


---------------------- Forwarded by Don Miller/HOU/ECT on 11/17/2000 06:05 PM
---------------------------

Ross Newlin@EES
11/17/2000 05:04 PM
To: Don Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: ORG CHARTS for New Albany, Caledonia & Brownsvile.

Per your request.
Ross
---------------------- Forwarded by Ross Newlin/HOU/EES on 11/17/2000 05:04
PM ---------------------------

Cecilia Ramirez
11/17/2000 04:57 PM
Sent by: Cecilia Ramirez
To: Ross Newlin/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: ORG CHARTS for New Albany, Caledonia & Brownsvile.


<<2R6L07!.DOC>>  <<2R6LRED.DOC>>  <<2RLS01!.DOC>>  <<2RLW01!.DOC>>

Kay:

After considering the changes that would be required to accommodate the
transformer, we elected to put both the second turbine and the transformer
into a single letter agreement for CA Energy Development II, LLC.
Accordingly, we have enclosed drafts of the following documents:

 1. Letter Agreement for CA Energy Development I, LLC;
 2. Redline of the CA Energy Development I, LLC Letter
Agreement, marked to reflect revisions from the draft furnished by Fulbright
and Jaworski;
 3. Letter Agreement for CA Energy Development II, LLC; and
 4. Redline of the CA Energy Development II, LLC Letter
Agreement, marked to reflect revisions from the CA Energy Development I, LLC
Letter Agreement.

Please review the enclosed and advise of any questions or comments.  Thank
you.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King & Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com>

Enclosures: 128541v7
  128541vR7/6
  129088v1
  129092v1

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

 - 2R6L07!.DOC
 - 2R6LRED.DOC
 - 2RLS01!.DOC
 - 2RLW01!.DOC


Aram Sogomonian

Phone: (503) 813 5754 (w)
           5608 (w)
 (503) 701 6692 (c)

 (503) 675 1658 (h)

kweenmarys@aol.com


Charlene,

Please, help. This is a son of a professor at Berkeley who helps me a lot in
the recruiting process.
His son goes to Cornell. Can we invite him (the son, not the professor) to a
Super Saturday? I really want
to repay the debt to his father who is very instrumental in  my recruiting
efforts.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 10/24/2000
04:40 PM ---------------------------

"Shmuel Oren" <oren@ieor.berkeley.edu> on 10/23/2000 04:37:25 PM
To: <vkamins@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Yaron's Resume

?
 - Yaron-RESUME3.doc


----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 11/10/2000 01:10 PM -----

	Sarah Novosel
	11/08/2000 09:44 AM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Part I of Staff Report

Here is Part I of the Staff report (on Calfornia).


Who wants to go see Cirque de Soleil's Dralion next year?  BMC is a
corporate sponsor so I can buy tickets before they go on sale to the public.

The available dates are:

Day Date Time
*	PREMIERE January 17, 2002 8:00 p.m.
*	Friday January 18, 2002 8:00 p.m.
*	Saturday January 19, 2002 4:00 p.m. and 8:00 p.m.
*	Sunday January 20, 2002 2:00 p.m. and 6:00 p.m.
*	Saturday January 26, 2002 4:00 p.m. and 8:00 p.m.
*	Sunday January 27, 2002 1:00 p.m. and 5:00 p.m.
*	Saturday February 2, 2002 4:00 p.m. and 8:00 p.m.
*	Sunday February 3, 2002 1:00 p.m. and 5:00 p.m.
*	Saturday February 9, 2002 4:00 p.m. and 8:00 p.m.
*	Sunday February 10, 2002 1:00 p.m. and 5:00 p.m.
*	Saturday February 16, 2002 4:00 p.m. and 8:00 p.m.
*	Sunday February 17, 2002 1:00 p.m. and 5:00 p.m.
Yes, this is a new show, not to be confused with Quidam which they did the
last time they were in Houston.  Now here's how I think we should handle
this.  Instead of your preferred date, respond to me by tomorrow with the
dates you are NOT available and I'll pick a date that avoids as many
scheduling conflicts as possible.  The deal that my company is offering
requires the purchase of fifteen tickets for a given performance.  If they
don't get 15, then we'll be offered an alternative date.  Tickets are $60
each.  Let me know if you are interested in going and how many tickets you
want by tomorrow and I'll put it all together as a single order.  You can
send me a check at the address below.

Can you say CIRCUS!

Chris Ballou
1725 Albans
Houston, TX 77005


Ian, there are no problems with Enron Metals Ltd. trading with bullion
through EOL with Australian resident or Australian incorporated
counterparties in the manner described.

Regards

David

Tina Ward@ECT
18/01/2001 01:05 AM
To: Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Caroline Duggan/LON/ECT@ECT, Ian Brungs/EU/Enron@Enron, Janine
Juggins/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT,
David Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt

Subject: Re: Bullion Trading

Hi Justin,

Just to confirm our conversation earlier, the contracting party for bullion
trading should be Enron Metals Ltd.

Thanks,
Tina

Caroline Duggan
17/01/2001 13:58
To: Ian Brungs/EU/Enron@Enron, Tina Ward/LON/ECT@ECT, Janine
Juggins/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Bullion Trading

Hi Ian,

With regards to your e-mail below, you refer to the entity being:
           The Enron counterparty to each trade will be Enron Capital & Trade
Resources International Corp. (as arranged by Enron Europe Finance & Trading
Limited, the SFA regulated entity).

        However, back in November we got confirmation from Tina Ward that the
entity would be Enron Metals Ltd:
   For both the UK and COMEX bullion, Enron Metals Ltd should be the
contracting party.

 Janine / Tina : Can you please confirm this for us? (I am sure that Enron
Metals Ltd is the correct entity.)

 Thanks
 Caroline PCG London

---------------------- Forwarded by Caroline Duggan/LON/ECT on 17/01/2001
13:48 ---------------------------

Amita Gosalia
17/01/2001 13:08
To: Caroline Duggan/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Lara Fields/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Bullion Trading

C

Please check entity with Janine.

A

Caroline Duggan
17/01/2001 12:48
To: Amita Gosalia/LON/ECT@ECT, Lara Fields/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Bullion Trading

fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Caroline Duggan/LON/ECT on 17/01/2001
12:52 ---------------------------

Ian Brungs@ENRON
16/01/2001 19:05
To: Caroline Duggan/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Bullion Trading

---------------------- Forwarded by Ian Brungs/EU/Enron on 16/01/2001 19:05
---------------------------

Ian Brungs
16/01/2001 19:05
To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT, David
Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt
cc: Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Bullion Trading

Dear Mark, Peter and David,
Justin and I have now carried out the legal due diligence necessary to trade
Bullion on EnronOnline with counterparties based in Sweden, Switzerland and
South Africa.
 We intend to launch two products; a spot forward contract (based on a price
fixed by our traders that is linked to the current traded price on the
Reuters page) in both gold and silver. These trades are all cleared, by paper
transfer, through the London Bullion Clearing System, and for this purpose
each contracting party is required to appoint a Clearing member. There are a
total of 7 Clearing members, all of which are banks or similar financial
institutions, and all of which are regulated by the Bank of England.
 The Enron counterparty to each trade will be Enron Capital & Trade Resources
International Corp. (as arranged by Enron Europe Finance & Trading Limited,
the SFA regulated entity). Settlement will occur through the crediting or
debiting of an unallocated gold account and the corresponding debiting or
crediting of a cash account.
 Please would you advise whether trading with counterparties from your
jurisdiction(s) in such products would give rise to any specific legal issues.
 The jurisdictions which I believe would fall under your remit are as follows:
 Mark: USA
  Peru
  Mexico
 Peter: Canada
David: Australia
If you have any questions or concerns please do not hesitate to contact
either Justin or myself.
Kind Regards,

Ian Brungs


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT on 04/24/2001
09:26 AM ---------------------------
From: Frank Hayden/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/24/2001 09:25 AM CDT
To: Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

FYI,
o Selling 500/d of SoCal, XH lowers overall desk VAR by $8 million
o Selling 500K KV, lowers overall desk VAR by $4 million

Frank


Andy,

As we discussed, here is my first pass at a letter to Tom Brown concerning
the contract issues as I discussed with them in my May 7, 2001 meeting with
TBI and Cantera.

Cantera has executed the PSA for the acquisition of the assets, and will be
closing in 6-8 weeks.

The excel spreadsheet has several graphs included in the workbook.  Only the
first 3 graphs were given to Cantera and Tom Brown :  the overall,
combination, and west lateral graphs.  The others were not given to TBI.
The remaining graphs and figures handed out in the meeting and referenced in
the letter are included in the Contracts Issue book I forwarded to you
earlier.

Please review ASAP.  I would like to get in the overnight tonight if at all
possible.

I have not yet decided who copies should go to - whether a copy of this
letter needs to go to Kinder Morgan folks (old Wildhorse) as well?

Ken Krisa

 - Press vs Prod Graphs 5-7-01 mtg.xls
 - TBI Ltr 5-15-01.doc


fyi.

Please follow up to make sure these $ are going to the correct p&l.

---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Neal/HOU/ECT on 08/14/2000 05:02 PM
---------------------------
From: Molly Sumrow on 08/14/2000 04:35 PM
To: Robert Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: CES Update

The first invoice for $5.4 million went out a couple of weeks ago.  CES came
back to us and said they were not going to pay.  They claimed that the total
of all of the invoices to this date that they have already paid had covered
that amount.  I have researched all of their invoices, and it looks like
there was a demand invoice in the system for the month of June for
approximately $6 million to much.  CES incorporated a credit for that invoice
in with the charge for $5.4 million, netting out to approximately $600,000.
I am meeting with CES on Thursday to see if we are in agreement.  The other
invoice for $7.5 million was sent out last week, CES is in agreement and the
payment should be here shortly.
   If you have any questions don't hesitate to call me.

Molly
x34249

Robert Superty
08/14/2000 04:06 PM
To: Molly Sumrow/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: CES Update

Molly, please see Scott's note below and give us an update.

Thanks - Bob
---------------------- Forwarded by Robert Superty/HOU/ECT on 08/14/2000
04:01 PM ---------------------------

Scott Neal
08/14/2000 03:18 PM
To: Robert Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: CES Update

What is the status of these invoices/payments?

Robert Superty
08/03/2000 04:02 PM
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent A
Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryce Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Molly Sumrow/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: CES Update

FYI - ongoing CES reconciliation. At this point we will be receiving app.
$5.4M (invoice sent on 7/27) with another $7.5M to be billed to them next
week.

Still more to come, for details read the attached from Molly.

Bob
---------------------- Forwarded by Robert Superty/HOU/ECT on 08/03/2000
03:52 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Molly Sumrow                           08/03/2000 03:47 PM

To: Robert Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT, Beverly
Beaty/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: CES Update

Attached is the current status of the CES reconciliation.  Please call me if
you have any questions.

Thank You,

Molly


It means that some people hear what they want to hear.  Michael Miller has
been asked to complete the work on the IM because we are going to need that
information at some point anyway.  Frank sees a far different process for the
North, while I foresee another big effort, but with a sale of the North in
smaller chunks.  Stay tuned....

Kelly Kimberly@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
04/04/2000 08:13 AM
To: J Mark Metts@Enron, Steven J Kean@EES
cc:
Subject: Employee memo

Gentlemen--here is the revised draft of the all-employee memo that we could
send from the Office of the Chairman.  Since Diomedes and David aren't
pushing this, I'd rather just keep it in reserve right now rather than keep
it moving.  (I am not sending this latest version to them.)  Mark, for your
info I am including the version that Diomedes and I have tentatively agreed
on that he would send to his region as well.

I am getting mixed signals on NoCal.  Michael Miller says he is still working
on their IM, yet today Frank Stabler said that he doesn't want the news clips
any more due to their "change in status".  What does this mean?