Thanks for looking into the OU/Texas tickets for us.  With the ages of the
kids, I think that we will pass on those single tickets.  The kids love our
home tradition for the game, and weren't sure that they wanted to give that
up. (I have cake pans in the shape of the state of Texas and the state of
Oklahoma - one daugther decorates one, and the other decorates the second
cake - add some bean dip and chips and it's our own version of a tailgate
party!)

We were hoping to bring Meagan up to look at OU this fall, with our eye on
that last game of the season. However, Klein High School has started the
football season very strongly, winning all games to date.  That means that we
may be headed for high school playoffs again this year.  Meagan is on the
drill team and must be at all games.  Last year, we played right up to
Thanksgiving in the playoffs.  So, we have decided to pick a weekend in the
spring after drill team contest season is over to make that trip with Meagan.

We are interested in caps, shirts, etc. for UT, OU and Texas Tech.  Do you
have a list of what is available for those schools?

"Jacobs, Ted K" <tjacobs@ou.edu> on 09/23/2000 03:07:11 PM
To: "'Sally.Beck@enron.com'" <Sally.Beck@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: RE: Oklahoma Trip

Thanks for the nice words. I hope Enron will be able to look at some
students for summer internships, as I am sure they will be gone by Spring.

As far as Texas tickets go, I can come up with 5 singles, but not 5 together
or even 3 and 2. Let me know if interested and I will try to get them. Might
be able to trade up or something.

Let me know what other schools you are talking about and I can find out for
you.

Again, thank you for taking time out your schedule to come up and be a part
of the OU recruiting effort. It has been your support and efforts that we
have to thank for Enron coming to OU. Keep me posted on what you work out
with HR with regards to summer interns.

"Hook Em"

Ted K. Jacobs
Director of Energy Management
The University of Oklahoma
307 West Brooks, Room 218
Norman, OK  73019-4007
(405)325-0758
Fax (405)325-2096
E-mail: tjacobs@ou.edu
Website: www.ou.edu/business/em

-----Original Message-----
From: Sally.Beck@enron.com [mailto:Sally.Beck@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2000 5:30 PM
To: Jacobs, Ted K
Subject: Oklahoma Trip

It was good to see you in Norman earlier this week.  As always, I
appreciated your attendance at the presentation and at Coach's afterwards.
I am sure that it is rewarding for you to see former students such as Jody
and Nate participating on the other side of the recruiting table.  You have
done a great job in changing and promoting the program.

I am pushing Lexi to resolve the question around interview dates for summer
interns ASAP.  I have also left Mike McConnell a message to make him aware
of the issue.  I should be able to get back with you next week, hopefully
with a change in our strategy!

If you do become aware of five OU /Texas tickets, please let me know.  We
will certainly purchase them, I just made the assumption that all tickets
may already be sold.

On another note, David has worn his OU shirt to work and has gotten lots of
compliments.  He has a number of people that have asked him about school
shirts, caps, etc.  Do you have a list of the schools that you can get
merchandise for and the types of merchandise that you can get?  Let me know
-- we can probably place a few orders through you!


Jean, I would like to order the BlackBerry.  My ID No. is 10028029.  Thanks. Lynn

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Scott, Donna
Sent:	Monday, October 15, 2001 3:28 PM
To:	Blair, Lynn; January, Steven; Holmes, Bradley; Nacey, Sheila; Dietz, Rick; Buchanan, John; Kowalke, Terry; Schoolcraft, Darrell; Spraggins, Gary; Perez, Kim; Kuehl, Toby
Cc:	McFarland, Jean; Scott, Donna
Subject:	BlackBerry by SkyTel Service and iPAQ

You have been selected to receive either a BlackBerry or iPAQ if you feel it will meet your business needs.

The BlackBerry provides the following features:
Fully interactive - write, send, receive and respond to messages right from the unit
Synchronize all email composed and responded to via your handheld with your desktop email
Email responses from RIM handhelds appear exactly as if they came from your desktop email
Access web information including stock quotes, news, travel, sports, entertainment and more
Coverage that follows you nationwide - with no roaming fees
The iPAQ pocket PC is
Simple to use slim and powerful Pocket PC in a leek, elegant design
Wireless-ready access to email, internet/intranet, and corporate network
Modular expansion packs for expandability and flexibility
Industry-leading hand held capabilities for the enterprise
Extensive software suite

If you choose the BlackBerry device, it will also replace your current pager.
For more information or to schedule a preview of these devices call Jean McFarland at 51615. Upon ordering you will
need to provide Jean McFarland an email with your name and external ID.
(Your external ID is located in eHRonline.enron.com.  To find it, log in to eHRonline.enron.com.  Select Personal Information, then select other.
This will bring you to your personal info page.  Your external ID is located in approximately the middle of the page to the right of your SAP ID.)

Please reply by Wednesday, October 24th.  If you have any questions, don't hesitate to give me a call at 36136.

Regards,
Donna


One of your friends sent this email through our website.
Friend's name: Coco Betancourt
Friend's IP address: 12.25.215.25
Date and Time: 12/4/00 10:41:45 AM EST
See the bottom of this message to report abuse.

Hi,

Coco Betancourt would like you to see this Web page:

http://www.daily-blessings.com/ch1p.htm

an invitation

================================================
Coco Betancourt also included this note:

Hi Barb and Judy.  Even though this is kinda Chrismasy, the message is very
Christian and nice.  I liked it, hope you like it too!

Love, Coco
================================================

Win a Billion Dollars!
Win a Billion Dollars!
Win a Billion Dollars!
Win a Billion Dollars!

go to:
http://mailbits.net/grab/taf.asp
Win a Billion Dollars !!!

____
***IMPORTANT NOTE***

This is a free service provided by MailBits.com.
Compared to regular email, this is a better way to
recommend a website to your friends. That's because
information about the sender of the message is included
to prevent and catch abuse of the system.

To report abuse of this service: abuse-taf@mailbits.com


Have I seen the Explorer??  Nope.  I just get to work for a living.  I don't
get to enjoy life's pleasures.


Don't bother - just let someone else sign - they are EBS ex employees.

Wait for them to request

From: Tana Jones on 18/10/2000 11:28
To: Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: NDA

I checked w/the Corp. Secretary's office, and they were unaware that Rex and
Dave  were appointed as MD's, so the corporate paralegal is getting the board
resolution passed adding them on, as well as adding Mark Palmer as a VP.

	Louise Kitchen
	10/18/2000 10:34 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: NDA

Rex Shelby or David Berberian to sign

From: Tana Jones on 18/10/2000 08:43
To: Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: NDA

Mike Haney with EBS.

	Louise Kitchen
	10/17/2000 05:58 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: NDA

PWC - whose NDA is it?

Please exapnd to all VPs.

Thanks


This is the deal that Susan F.  worked on on Friday.  I'll forward the
Schedule to you.  No one is asking for a revised Schedule yet but we should
make the change and email  the parties on Susan's email so that everyone
knows the latest changes and then ask if anyone has comments.  ss
---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 12/20/99 12:39
PM ---------------------------

Tracy Ngo
12/20/99 12:36 PM
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Merrill Lynch - Financial Contract

In follow up to our conversation earlier today, please take out the Threshold
Amount applying to the parties of the ISDA.  This would result in the
Threshold Amount to only be tied to the Credit Support Providers.  This
provision will then be parallel with the physical contract.

Regards,
Tracy
---------------------- Forwarded by Tracy Ngo/HOU/ECT on 12/20/99 12:31 PM
---------------------------

Tracy Ngo
12/17/99 03:33 PM
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Rodney Malcolm/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Merrill Lynch Credit Worksheets

Please find the financial credit worksheet for an ISDA Master Swap Agreement
between EPMI and Merrill Lynch Capital Services, Inc.  I am available at
x3-0554 should you have any questions.

Regards,
Tracy


This project, of all that have been proposed recently, probably has a better
chance of success.  First, Mission Energy is already a huge player in the
IPP/Cogen business in Kern County, and is regarded as fairly skilled at
getting permits/authorizations through the system.  Their existing facilites
on Texaco's leases currently produce over 1,000 MW of power.  Secondly, this
project would sit smack dab in the middle of the Midway-Sunset field and is
easily accessible off the West Side Lateral of Kern/Mojave's system.  As
such, they are probably a prime candidate for either Phase I or Phase II of
Kern River's expansion.  Also, realize that Texaco has a substantial amount
of field area [associated oil] gas, so, depending on the structure of the
Texaco - Mission Energy sales agreement, Mission probably has access to or
call on this Texaco production (i.e., they have the perfect physical hedge).

Kern would seem to be the "pipeline of choice" here... particularly, when you
consider the impact of the reduced rates under their proposed expansion.
Without the direct connection into Kern County, TW would have a difficult
time competing.   Also, keep an eye out for El Paso moving forward with
commercial plans for the California leg of All American Pipeline.  A large
end-use plant like this could be the basis for an "En-Rate" type transport
program on El Paso-All American, particularly if they get their allocation
problems resolved at FERC.

---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron on 11/22/2000
08:56 AM ---------------------------
Market Intelligence - Enron Transportation Services
From: Lorna Brennan on 11/22/2000 08:48 AM
To: Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON,
Lorraine Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Christine
Stokes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, TK Lohman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michelle
Lokay/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Lindy Donoho/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lee
Huber/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject:

Edison Mission Energy to build power plant in California

Edison Mission Energy, an Edison International company, is purchasing the
rights to the Sunrise Power Project from Texaco Power and Gasification. A
proposed power generation facility to be located in Kern County, Calif., the
project will bring both short- and long-term generation capacity to the
state, which is in dire need of new power generation.

The Sunrise Power Project will be completed in two phases. Phase 1 will
consist of a 320-MW, simple-cycle peaking facility scheduled to be in
service during the summer of 2001. Phase 2 will convert the peaking facility
to a 560-MW, combined-cycle operation with an in-service date of summer
2003.

Final regulatory approvals should be received shortly for Phase I of the
project. Edison Mission Energy plans to seek expedited permitting approval
for the Phase II expansion in line with the fast-track approvals process
recently enacted by the California legislature.

Edison Mission Energy specializes in the development, acquisition,
construction management and operation of global power production facilities.
The company owns nearly 23,000 MW of generating capacity, including
interests in 75 projects currently under construction or operating in
Australia, Indonesia, Italy, New Zealand, Puerto Rico, Spain, Thailand,
Turkey, the United Kingdom and the United States.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Blair, Kit
Sent:	Thursday, August 09, 2001 5:37 PM
To:	Stokley, Chris
Subject:


Carlos, you have much  wisdom for such a young buckeroo.

If Debbie can't decide and if you can't use the PaperCity photo (it realy is
a good pic), I'd go with the first one.  I must say that all of them look
pretty, well, serious.  Kinda Gore-like, you know.

Ok, that was a low blow.  I was just kidding!!

Kay

From: Carlos Sole@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 10/27/2000 03:44 PM
To: "Keffer, John" <JKeffer@KSLAW.com>@ENRON
cc: Carlos.Sole@enron.com@ENRON, Cschnur@KSLAW.com@ENRON,
john.schwartzenburg@enron.com@ENRON, Kay.Mann@enron.com@ENRON

Subject: Re: FW: Photo Picks

I would opt for the photo that you had in your Paper City article about you
being the commentator at the polo matches as that photo conveyed a more
rugged and stylish image.  I see these pictures and think -- "Al Gore, no
George Bush, no Al Gore, no George Bush, well I can't make up mind, is there
a Ralph Nader picture that I can choose from?"  All that being said, if they
were my pictures, I'd let my wife decide, otherwise, I'd be subject to an
eternity of second-guessing.

	"Keffer, John" <JKeffer@KSLAW.com>
	10/27/2000 03:32 PM

		 To: "Mann, C. Kay" <Kay.Mann@enron.com>, "Sole, Carlos A., III"
<Carlos.Sole@enron.com>, "Schwartzenburg, John W."
<john.schwartzenburg@enron.com>, "Schnur, Carmen" <Cschnur@KSLAW.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: Photo Picks

I need your vote!
-----Original Message-----
From: Lacy, Callie
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2000 3:18 PM
To: Keffer, John
Subject: Photo Picks

Attached is a word document that contains your photos, please scroll through
them and let me know which number you would like to use for our Marketing
Materials and the Web site. Thank you.

Callie Lacy
Client Services
King & Spalding
404.572.3029

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

 - Doc1.doc


Kay,
One of the first things we do after we execute an option agreement is to get
into the interconnect queue.  To do so, we must enter into an interconnect
study agreement and in the past we have entered into these agreements using
the same project agreement that has the option agreement.  Are you saying
that we need two project companies for each project: one for the option
agreement and one for the interconnect study agreement?  As you may know, it
has taken 11 months to get to the point in the Midway project from the time
we executed an interconnect study agreement with FPL to today when we are
ready to begin negotiating a construction and connection agreement.  Would
you please clarify the issue for me?

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Carnahan, Kathleen
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 1:03 PM
To: Mann, Kay
Cc: Krause, Greg
Subject: RE: FW: New lease option

Okay.  I will set up a new LLC (Homestead Development Company, LLC, if
available).  Would it be preferable for its sole member to be Lauderdale Land
Development Company, LLC or ENA?

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Mann, Kay
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 12:46 PM
To: Carnahan, Kathleen
Subject: Re: FW: New lease option

I wouldn't use  an LLC with an prior history.  We might have to get the old
stuff approved in order to put the equity into TurboPark.  If the LLC paid
for an interconnect study, it could be a hard cost and we are dead.

I know this seems silly, but hey, it is!

ckm

From: Kathleen Carnahan/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/23/2001 11:31 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: FW: New lease option

We have decided to use:  Voyager Development Company, L.L.C. for the new
Homestead land option.  We had initially planned to use it for an option that
we let go (Option Agreement never got assigned to Voyager either).  According
to Greg Krause, the only thing associated with Voyager was an old
interconnect study request that was paid for and never used.  I feel
confident that Voyager is "clean" to use.

Kathleen
 -----Original Message-----
From:  Ann Elizabeth White
Sent: Saturday, May 19, 2001 12:19 AM
To: Kathleen Carnahan
Subject: New lease option

I talked to Kay about the new land option Greg will be negotiating this
weekend in Homestead.  She said to put the options in the terminal company,
not Lauderdale Land, LLC as you had suggested.  Pick one of the other LLCs
for me and let me know the name.

Thanks.


Hi Robin,

Alright, if this is not correct you have permission to beat me within an inch
of my life (and I'll be in Houston next week too!).

The IMPositions xls file is also saved to the Houston Directory.

See you in person next week!, I'll let you know when we're official.

Brian


Yes you are!  So does that work, for me to meet you at the restaurant at 6:00?

-----Original Message-----
From: Karen L. Taylor [mailto:kltaylor@duke-energy.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 4:49 PM
To: Lucci, Paul T.
Subject: RE:

yes, how convenient for you to have me drive so you can get liquored up at
dinner and the concert!  Always thinking of others aren't you?  Just
kidding.  I realize I'm the more responsible one and a much more logical
choice given the options!

                    "Lucci, Paul
                    T."                   To:     "Karen L. Taylor" <kltaylor@duke-energy.com>
                    <Paul.T.Lucci@        cc:
                    enron.com>            Subject:     RE:

                    11/06/01 04:36
                    PM

Did you get my voice mail about the logistics of tomorrow night?

-----Original Message-----
From: Karen L. Taylor [mailto:kltaylor@duke-energy.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 4:34 PM
To: plucci@enron.com
Subject:

Mark and Rachel Reinert and Marc and Sheri Bokelman will also be at the
concert tomorrow night.

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


?
[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]
																										[IMAGE]

																				Enerfax Daily

																		[IMAGE]
																																[IMAGE]

																														")} TC
																								[IMAGE]
																																		[IMAGE]

																																			[IMAGE]

																																								[IMAGE]

																																Looking  for a past article or issue. Click here to use Sagewave's  Search.

																															Enerfax  Daily? -? Page  ? -? November 27,  2000

																																							[IMAGE]

																																				[IMAGE]

																																						Enerfax  Daily? -?  Page 4? -?  November 27, 2000 -? ?  Past  Issues
Available on Sagewave

																																								[IMAGE]
																																		[IMAGE]

																																													[IMAGE]
																																						[IMAGE]
																																									[IMAGE]
																																									[IMAGE]

																																	Consultant Says Mexico to Pay Billions for Natural Gas

																																	? ?  Mexico, over the next decade, will likely need to spend $40.6  Billion
to import natural gas, given Pemex's failure to conduct  adequate capital
investment, consultants Consultores Internacionales  have said in a report.
The estimate assumes an average price for  natural gas of $4.50 per MMBtu
over the period. In a more  conservative scenario, with the average price of
natural gas at  $3.50 per MMBtu, the country over the next 10 years would
need to  spend $31.6 billion dollars on natural gas imports, according to
the  report. Under both scenarios, estimates expect that Mexico will need  to
import 24.7 Bcf of natural gas during the coming decade.

																																					[IMAGE]

																									Natural? Gas? Storage?  Report

																												[IMAGE]
																												[IMAGE]

																												? ? ? ? ? ? Week?  ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?  ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?  Prev?
																												? ? ? ? ?  ?Ending? ? Prev? ? ? ?  ? ? ? ? ? ?Prev? ?  Year? ?
																												| Region | 11/17/00| Week | Diff | % Full | Year |  % Full
																												|  Prod? ?|? ?664? ?|? 688 |  -24? |? 70%? ?|? 843 |?  89%? ?
																												| East? ?|? 1643?  ?| 1682 | -39? |? 90%? ?| 1711  |? 94%? ?
																												| West? ?|? ?341?  ?|? 372 | -31? |? 67%? ?|?  442 |? 87%? ?
																												|? ? ? ?  |? ? ? ? ?|? ? ?  |? ? ? |? ? ? ? |?  ? ? |? ? ? ?
																												| Total? |? 2648?  ?| 2742 | -94? |? 80%? ?| 2996  |? 91%? ?

																												[IMAGE]

																												[IMAGE]

																																										[IMAGE]

																																											Enerfax  Daily? -?  Page 7? -?  November 27, 2000

																																									[IMAGE]

																																										[IMAGE]

																																				September Canadian Natural Gas Sales

																																				Natural gas sales totaled 4.22 billion cubic meters in  September, up 10.2%
over September 1999. The increase was the result  of increased demand by the
industrial and residential sectors. Use  by the industrial sector rose 11.7%,
amid higher use of natural gas  for electricity generation and stronger
demand by the chemical  industry. Year-to-date sales were up 7.1% over the
same period in  1999. Industrial sector sales continued to grow strongly,
posting an  11.1% increase. Consumption by the residential sector increased
1%,  while the commercial sector decreased 1.1%.

																																												[IMAGE]
																																								[IMAGE]

																																								[IMAGE]

																																														Financial Summary

																																											[IMAGE]

																													")} TC
																						[IMAGE]

 - blnk.gif
 - img17.gif
 - img18.gif
 - img19.gif
 - img20.gif
 - img21.gif
 - img22.gif
 - img23.gif
 - img24.gif
 - img25.gif
 - img26.gif
 - img27.gif
 - img28.gif
 - img29.gif
 - img30.gif
 - img31.gif
 - img32.gif
 - img33.gif
 - img34.gif
 - img35.gif
 - img10.gif
 - img36.gif
 - img37.gif
 - id=444924


Savita, Desk Heads


IPAMS has scheduled the next Media Training for Board Members, Wednesday, January 9, 2002, at 9:00 a.m. in the IPAMS Conference Room.  Please RSVP to Carla Wilson, 303-623-0987, or cwilson@ipams.org if you will be able to attend.  Space is limited and will be made available on a first-come-first-served basis!  Thanks!


Get ready.  Beginning in November, electronic pay stubs will be available to all employees who have their paychecks direct deposited into their bank account.  Electronic pay stubs are an easy, fast, and efficient way for you to get your payroll information.  They will also help Enron to realize a considerable savings in time and dollars spent over traditional printed pay stubs.

If you prefer to receive a hardcopy of your pay stub, click on the link below to complete a request form.  This form must be submitted to Payroll by October 15, 2001.  Unless you submit a form your pay stub information will default to electronic viewing.

Please click on the link below.

Name:             PETER KEAVEY
Personnel number: P00503324
Phone:            7138537277

If you have questions about electronic pay stubs, please contact Janice Priddy (Payroll) 713-853-7839 or Marie Newhouse (ClickAtHome) at 713-345-4185 or send an email to  Enron.Payroll@enron.com (Enron Payroll in Outlook).

Stay tuned for more details in the coming weeks.

http://etcsurvey.corp.enron.com/wi/p0810709/i.asp?r=18778&s=IDJRVLPF&l=9


vince.j.kaminski@enron.com

Following our highly successful conference last year in Brussels, we are now
in the process of planning this year's event, which should take place by mid
June in Canada.

Our previous corporate art conferences in London & Paris have demonstrated
to various industry sectors the benefits of corporate investment in national
and local community art, as a vehicle for marketing communications, in what
is becoming a highly charged stakeholder society.

The conference will cover themes such as integration of art into corporate
strategy, the practical issues of building and managing art collections and
an examination of the legal and tax incentives as well as insurance,
applicable to the North American market. We also intend to address the
shareholders' and employees' reactions to their company being involved in
art, and to research more practical matters such as budgeting and planning
for a corporate art collection. Speakers will be invited to provide as many
visuals and case studies as possible.

I am presently researching the topic with a view to identifying
well-qualified speakers on the subject, and assess who would be prepared to
participate in the conference as a speaker, delegate or sponsor.

If this message falls within the remit of another of your colleagues I would
be very grateful if you could forward this message to them.  I would welcome
your thoughts for the conference and look forward to hearing from you
shortly.

Kind regards

Michele Christensen
Conference Marketing Manager

Global Business Network Ltd
9 Wimpole Street
London
W1M 8LB
England
Tel: 0044 020 7291 1030
Fax: 0044 020 7291 1001
Website: www.gbnuk.com

170433


That fact that you asked "who?" begs the further question of what exactly you
were up to in Houston.  Have the Brits ever really won a battle any way?
(Their failure to beat a bunch of colonized farmers with pitch forks has
resulted directly in this Florida mess, and their failure to put away the
French (of all people) has resulted directly in me and the vast majority of
my fellow Canadians being subjected to official and legally mandated
bilingualism).

To the point, I believe San Felipe is the battle field adjacent to the
Westheimer battle field, where the Brits (or at least one of them) were
purportedly waging a more efficient war, until being caught red handed on the
battle fields of San Felipe, where, all the while, the Canadian forces (or at
least one of them) were so successfully conquering the enemy.

Peter.

Jon Chapman
11/15/2000 06:43 AM
To: Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Nice VP and possibly Pres.

Who or what the ****ing hell is San Felipe - I don't remember the Brits ever
winning a battle there .

Jon

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources
	Canada Corp.

	From:  Peter Keohane                           14/11/2000 18:35

To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jon Chapman/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Nice VP and possibly Pres.

When I look at Al Gore I continue to be amazed that one, let alone 50
million, Americans voted for him.  Both Clinton's and Gore's continued
shamelessness, and disregard for doing the right and decent thing, is only
slightly less amazing than the American people (or at least half of them)
continuing to find reasons to support them.  My only, yet substantive, vested
interest in the outcome is that we are inundated with US T.V. and I can't
bear the thought of looking at Gore (and God forbid Hillary) for the next
four years.  If they don't settle this Florida thing, I am going to have it
have my cable disconnected.

We vote in our federal election on November 27th.  We will not have any such
problems however - not because we are any better than anyone (in fact, I am
not entirely confident that most of my fellow Canadians will understand, or
have ever have understood, the ballot or voted for who they thought they were
voting for) - but rather because of the political system which Jon's
ancestors were so kind to bestow upon us, which I refer to as "parliamentary
dictatorship''.

(Sorry Tana if you are a Democrat, but that is the independent middle of the
road - yeah right - view of a Canadian observer.  Jon, I cannot, however,
apologize for the political ruin which your system of Government has brought
upon us, other to acknowledge that the problem my not be the system but
rather our screwed up regionalization of your unified parliamentary system
into 11 separate parliamentary systems - and I suppose that could be
construed as an apology of sorts, except, for the record, I will never
apologize to you for anything until you make a public, i.e. to Tana and me by
e-mail, confession of your sins on San Felipe.  For that matter, you are as
bad as Clinton and Gore.)

Peter.


John O'Shea was looking for the revenue backup for NNG.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hayslett, Rod
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 3:55 PM
To:	Howard, Kevin A.
Subject:	TW Plan and Forecast revenue backup

 << File: PLAN_FORECAST_DESIGN_MASTER_WITH_STRETCH_Rev_10_08.xls >>  << File: CE 3-2001.xls >>

Rod Hayslett
EB4054
713-853-6178


I figure longer life expectancy is just to make up for all the crummy female
days we have.  We probably have the same number of quality days as men.  If
that!

From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 01/22/2001 03:16 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re:

I don't know what's wrong with me!  The last three weeks I've been gaining
weight steadily even though I've been working out and watching what I eat.
Something is going on.  Today, I had to go to the gastro for my hernia and
the fact that colon cancer runs in my family.   He took blood to check my
organs, etc.  He also gave me my prescription for Prilosec and Vioxx (for
arthritis).  I'm coughing and it feels like bronchitis so I'm going to the
allergist tomorrow.  Thursday is the big day, fight with Dr. Hamilton over
whether it's hormones, do I need a hysterectomy. get this weight off of me,
stuff like that.  I'm miserable and I know it's not fat because it's come on
way too soon.  Johnson said it could be a reaction to getting off the Prozac
and I might need to get back on it.  I did lose a lot of weight when I got on
it but the hormones had put it on me in the first place.  Being a woman is so
hard!!!!!!!!!  Let me rephrase that, an aging woman.  The doctor even said so
today.  He's a cutie too so if you ever have an ulcer or hiatal hernia, I
highly recommend him.  He's really a great doctor, very thorough and you
odn't have to take your clothes off all the time.  I love that!!!!

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	01/22/2001 01:33 PM

		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject:

Are you ok?

ckm


Start Date: 1/27/02; HourAhead hour: 15;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002012715.txt


I think the memo needs some additional work.  I have made a number of
suggestion (highlighted on the attached).

From: Karen Moore/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/30/2001 07:56 AM
To: Cindy Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Karen
Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Oxley/ENRON@enronXgate, Andrea Yowman/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Gina
Corteselli/ENRON@enronXgate, Robert K Jones/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: PRC MEMO from Skilling

Attached is a draft of the PRC memo to go out from Jeff at the end of this
week for your review.  Karen Denne, Michelle Cash, and Gina Corteselli have
reviewed the document and their comments/edits/suggestions have been made
accordingly.  Please have your responses to me no later than COB Wednesday,
May 2, 2001.

Thanks,
Karen


Mark,

Inasmuch as you expect to close the 3rd 1/3rd of the "Preston" deal later
today, Susan Pereira has confirmed that the East Desk will pay TGT index plus
$0.005 for this package as described below:

a.  35 month term commencing 2/1/2001 and ending 12/31/2003

b.  firm purchase and firm transport for 90% of the wellhead volume, starting
at 90% of 5,783 per day and declining

c.  gas daily purchase and interruptible transport for the remaining 10% of
the wellhead volume

Enron Upstream will keep the desk financially whole should volumes for the
90% firm component fail to show up on any given day of the 35 month term

The ENA Wellhead Desk will pay you TGT index plus $0.0025

George x3-6992

---------------------- Forwarded by George Weissman/HOU/ECT on 01/17/2001
10:22 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  George Weissman                           12/29/2000 08:31 AM

To: Lia Halstead/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Gary Bryan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Moon/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Griffith/Corp/Enron@Enron, Eric Wardle/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda
Roberts/NA/Enron@Enron, Jill T Zivley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa
Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob M Hall/NA/Enron@Enron, William Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Robert Crockett/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: St. Mary's Production LLC VPP
Hunt Oil Company Myette Point Northwest Field
St. Mary Parish, LA

Lia, Jay Hartman (281.367.8697) has verbally advised us that the SL 14521 #1
well will be shut-in for a short period and has therefore requested that we
reduce the existing nomination for 01/2001 at TGT meter 9502 on sitara deal
540814 from 316 Mmbtu/d (13% of 2,434 Mmbtu/d) to 0.  You indicated you will
reduce the nomination to 0 for the entire month; we will notify you once
production re-commences and the nomination should be re-entered at its
previous level.

Jill, this gas was purchased from Hunt in December by the East Desk, so no
Wellhead Desk changes are required for this month.

George x3-6992
---------------------- Forwarded by George Weissman/HOU/ECT on 12/29/2000
08:11 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  George Weissman                           12/28/2000 05:58 PM

To: Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lia Halstead/NA/Enron@ENRON, Gary
Bryan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary G Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jason Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: St. Mary's Production LLC VPP
Hunt Oil Company Myette Point Northwest Field
St. Mary Parish, LA

Sam, the counterparty record for St. Mary's Production LLC (BA 88272) does
not include a DnB status.  It is my understanding that our East Desk cannot
schedule St. Mary's gas without a DnB number.  Could you please have a DnB
number established for St. Mary's Production LLC?  Thanks.

Due to the holidays, I sent a copy of this note to both Mary and Jason.

George x3-6992
---------------------- Forwarded by George Weissman/HOU/ECT on 12/28/2000
05:44 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  George Weissman                           12/27/2000 08:17 AM

To: Judy Townsend/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Susan W Pereira/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary Bryan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric
Moon/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Griffith/Corp/Enron@Enron, Eric Wardle/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Linda Roberts/NA/Enron@Enron, Jill T Zivley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa
Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob M Hall/NA/Enron@Enron, Lia Halstead/NA/Enron@ENRON,
William Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Crockett/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: St. Mary's Production LLC VPP
Hunt Oil Company Myette Point Northwest Field
St. Mary Parish, LA

Judy,

Confirming our telephone conversation of this morning, please convert the gas
daily volume of 1,157 Mmbtu/d for 1/2001 on ticket 541140 (intra-desk) to an
increased volume of 2,434 Mmbtu/d for 1/2001 at Index plus $0.005.

With respect to the Wellhead Desk/St. Mary's ticket, please also convert the
gas daily volume of 1,157 Mmbtu/d for 1/2001 on ticket 540814 to an increased
volume of 2,434 Mmbtu/d for 1/2001 at Index plus $0.0025.

Currently, the volumes are split 50-50 between meters 9437 and 9502.  We
actually expect 87% of the volume at meter 9437 and 13% of the voume at meter
9502.

George x3-6992

---------------------- Forwarded by George Weissman/HOU/ECT on 12/27/2000
07:59 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  George Weissman                           12/20/2000 09:01 AM

To: Eric Moon/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Griffith/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Gary Bryan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Wardle/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda
Roberts/NA/Enron@Enron, Jill T Zivley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa
Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob M Hall/NA/Enron@Enron, Lia Halstead/NA/Enron@ENRON,
William Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: St. Mary's Production LLC VPP
Hunt Oil Company Myette Point Northwest Field
St. Mary Parish, LA

Eric (Moon) and John, attached are the tickets for the physical part of the
Preston VPP deal.  Please work with Will Kelly to have them entered into
Sitara and provide me with the deal numbers.

Eric (Wardle), we'll need to get contract numbers established for the
Counterparty Firm Agreement (ECT Merchant Investments) and the Counterparty
Spot Agreement (St. Mary's Production LLC).  Have either of these agreements
yet been executed?  If not, should we generate a spot gtc for the St. Mary's
spot production?

George x3-6992

---------------------- Forwarded by George Weissman/HOU/ECT on 12/20/2000
08:31 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  George Weissman                           12/19/2000 08:03 AM

To: Eric Moon/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Griffith/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Gary Bryan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Wardle/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda
Roberts/NA/Enron@Enron, Jill T Zivley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa
Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob M Hall/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: St. Mary's Production LLC VPP
Hunt Oil Company Myette Point Northwest Field
St. Mary Parish, LA

Eric & John

ECT Merchant Investments Corp. has entered into a Volumetric Production
Payment agreement with St. Mary's Production LLC which provides for the
dedication of St. Mary's non-operated gas production from the Hunt Oil
Company operated Myette Point Northwest Field.  ECT Merchant Investments
Corp. has arranged for the Enron North America Upstream Wellhead Desk to
manage the sale, nomination and transport of this production.

Could you please get us a quote to purchase this wellhead gas on a firm basis
based on the following:

a.  30 month term commencing 1/1/2001 and ending 6/30/2003

b.  firm purchase and firm transport for 90% of the wellhead volume, starting
at 90% of 11,567 per day and declining as defined on the last tab labelled
"Volume" on the spreadsheet attached

c.  gas daily purchase and interruptible transport for the remaining 10% of
the wellhead volume

Enron Upstream will keep the desk financially whole should volumes for the
90% firm component fail to show up on any given day of the 18 month term

Drafts of proposed Deal Tickets are attached.

George x3-6992


I know it sounds strange. But that is the convention is in Australia to talk
in MW and then divide by 2 to move to MWh for the half hourly Calculation
Period. (I fact both MW and MWh are quoted in Confirmations.)  After
considerable discussion it was considered the least confusing alternative.

To be sure I will revisit it again with the traders.

To: David Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Shari Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Australiann Power Product Long Form Decsriptions

I just looked at the first couple of documents attached and wanted to make
sure the second item listed in them works.  Is everyone comfortable that the
volume should be submitted in megawatts and then divided in half to produce
megawatt hours?  I think it works but I had to work through it to get there -
it wasn't immediately obvious to me.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 02/22/2000 08:53
AM ---------------------------

Paul Smith@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
02/21/2000 06:30 PM
To: David Forster/LON/ECT@ECT, Dale Neuner@ECt, Mark Dilworth@ECT, Mark
Taylor@ECT
cc: Michael Sim/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, David
Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Product Long Form Decsriptions

Dave,

Here are the final Long Form Descriptions for the remaining regions (NSW,
QLD, SA).

The term of the Swaps that will initially be offered via EOL has yet to be
decided, but I assume we can set those in the Product Manager when we create
Australian Power Products.

Rgds
Paul


To:	    Employees

From:	    ENRON Benefits Department

Subject:    All Employees Participating in the ENRON Domestic Benefit Plans

Enron Benefit Plans
Summary Annual Report

The basic financial and insurance information on the back of this page, as well as the material below, provide a Summary Annual Report for the Enron Benefit Plans.  The annual report for each plan has been filed with the Internal Revenue Service, as required by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA).

NOTE:  You may receive a report for a benefit plan in which you are not a participant or under which you are not entitled.  Entitlement to benefits under any of the plans is based on the provisions of each plan.

Your Rights to Additional Information

You have the right to receive, upon request, a copy of the full annual report, or any part thereof, for any plan.  For insured plans, insurance information (including any sales commissions paid by insurance carriers) is shown in the annual reports.

To obtain a copy of the full annual report, or any part thereof, for any plan, write or call:

Enron Corp Shareholder Relations
1400 Smith Street
Houston, TX  77002-7311

(713) 853-6161

You also have the right to receive from the plan administrator, on request and at no charge, a statement of the assets and liabilities of the plan and accompanying notes, or a statement of income and expenses of the plan and accompanying notes, or both.  If you request a copy of the full annual report from the plan administrator, these two statements and accompanying notes will be included as part of that report.

You also have the legally protected right to examine the annual report at the main office of the plan (Enron Corp., 1400 Smith Street, Houston, TX  77002-7311) and at the U.S. Department of Labor in Washington, D.C., or to obtain a copy from the U.S. Department of Labor upon payment of copying costs.  Requests to the Department should be addressed to:  Public Disclosure Room, N-5638, Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20210.


Please review and forward comments to me early Thursday morning so we can
distribute along with a copy of my explanatory memo.  I will forward a
redraft of the memo to you for final review prior to distributing to John L
and Dave D.
Thanks


PLEASE DO NOT RESPOND TO THIS E-MAIL--THIS ACCOUNT IS NOT MONITORED

AP User:

Attached is/are the payment proposal(s) for your business unit.  Please review and forward to your approver(s)/CAO.

Thank you.
SAP AP Team
 - 20020107-DENWC.XLS


Can you help me with this?
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 04/17/2001 03:59 PM -----

	Sara Shackleton
	04/17/2001 03:33 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: PLEASE READ:  Sonoco Products Company

The prior trading dispute resulted from a plastics deal and Doug Friedman was
the trader.  I would check with Doug.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	Tana Jones
	04/17/2001 01:41 PM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol St
Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent Hendry/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Tom Moran/Enron@EnronXGate, Walter Guidroz/Enron@EnronXGate
		 Subject: PLEASE READ:  Sonoco Products Company

The referenced counterparty is on the list below for online approval to trade
us gas financial products.  This counterparty came through before on the
1/20/00 list and we did not approve them for financial trading because of a
"payment dispute".  Is anyone out there aware of the payment dispute with
this counterparty, and has it been resolved?  Can we open this counterparty
up to trade financial?  They are an ESP...
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 04/17/2001 01:21 PM -----

	Walter Guidroz/ENRON@enronXgate
	04/12/2001 05:21 PM

		 To: Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel
Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/ENRON@enronXgate,
Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli
Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate, Cynthia Clark/ENRON@enronXgate, Enron Europe
Global CounterParty/LON/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom
Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Claudia Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S
Bradford/ENRON@enronXgate, Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Juana
Fayett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jana Morse/Corp/Enron@Enron, Trang Le/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Paul Maley/LON/ECT@ECT, Sonya Clarke/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim Davies/LON/ECT@ECT,
Karen O'Day/NA/Enron@Enron, Tanya Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Kelly
Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron, Brian Lindsay/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, EOL Call Center@ECT, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill D
Hare/HOU/ECT@ect, Amy Heffernan/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Molly LaFuze/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Danny Clark/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron,
Mandola@/O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=NOTESADDR/CN=BCBC586C-1D5A658C-862568C
D-532EF3@EX@enronXgate,
Kyle@/O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=NOTESADDR/CN=97746094-1B0A69C0-86256945-5
803A9@EX@enronXgate
		 cc:
		 Subject: EOL approvals, 04-12-01

Please see attached.


Rusty,

I will get with Kathleen and we will prepare on a form.  However, you will
need to provide one of us with the details on a case-by-case basis, so that
we (Kathleen) can generate the CA's and track them in the legal department
database.

If we have the following information, a CA can typically be generated on a
same day basis:

name, address of counterparty, including name of contact person
type of deal contemplated
what type of information is being provided
whether both parties are providing information
whether exclusivity/non-circumvention provisions are desired

Thanks,

Kay

Rusty Stevens
02/14/2001 03:06 PM
To: Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Healy/SF/ECT@ECT

Subject: Confidentiality Agreements

Kathleen / Kay:

As you know, Fred and I are continuing to engage various parties in an
attempt to sell the Illinois sites.  Scott has asked that we use a CA that
doesn't preclude States where we have sites he is trying to sell as we are
collaborating with him on this effort.  He also wants a document in place
that can cover the sale of equipment.

In talking to Fred, it appears that the Dynegy CA is the latest and greatest
document that works for this task, however the PSEG deal may also work.
Please forward me an electronic form that you feel is most appropriate - with
blanks where all counterparty names are shown - so I can forward them to
additional parties (such as FPL, Duke, Tenaska, Unicom, etc.).

I would like to get this out to a couple of these parties tomorrow if
possible since we are already talking to other parties and want to maximize
price and likelihood of closure.


There are no rainouts in this league - so try to show up by 8:30


Here is the most recent version of the spreadsheet and the accompanying
assumptions.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	"Cagle, Donna" <DCAGLE@mariner-energy.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Friday, October 12, 2001 8:27 AM
To:	Edison, Deborah J.
Subject:	Mariner Management Meeting Minutes

.

 <<10-11-01.doc>>  <<SUMMARY.xls>>

Donna M. Cagle
Executive Administrator to President & CEO
Mariner Energy, Inc.
580 WestLake Park Blvd., Suite 1300
Houston, TX  77079
281/584-5511 (phone)     281/584-5515 (fax)
dcagle@mariner-energy.com

 - 10-11-01.doc
 - SUMMARY.xls


Gonzalez, Esmeralda would like to recall the message, "".


Sorry I did not attach the confirm.

---------------------- Forwarded by Melissa Ann Murphy/HOU/ECT on 09/05/2000
05:27 PM ---------------------------

Melissa Ann Murphy
09/05/2000 04:29 PM
To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jason R Wiesepape/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edith Cross/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Consolidated Edison, Inc. Confirmation Letter

Hi Mark, I work in the power documentation group and create power financial
confirms.  Can you please look at the following confirm and let me know if
anything needs to be changed?  I understand that you are the attorney that
knows about this deal.

Please contact Jason Wiesepape if you have any questions about the deal
itself.

Thank you,
Melissa Murphy
3-1886


Please disregard the first e-mail I sent.  I am sorry for the confusion.
This file has the correct positions, both NYMEX and OTC, that you requested.

Thanks,

Errol


Here is an updated deal sheet for the week of Monday Feb. 12th.  I will be
going through the deal sheet today with Ben, so he can track the deals and
update the deal sheet on a weekly basis.
Thanks,
Ben


My housecleaner has hidden my notebook and materials for Tasker's class.
Can
someone please tell me which reading we are supposed to have done for
Thursday's
class?  Also, would someone please fax me the 1-page list of questions we
need
to have prepared?

Thanks

**********************************************
Mark D. Guinney, CFA
Consultant
Watson Wyatt Investment Consulting
345 California Street, Ste. 1400
San Francisco, CA  94104
(415) 733-4487 ph.
(415) 733-4190 fax


This is mostly just a template at this point.  Lisa has it as well.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 07/14/2000 02:37
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kay Mann                           07/14/2000 02:10 PM

To: Laura Luce/Corp/Enron@Enron, Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rusty
Stevens/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Gregg Penman/Corp/Enron@Enron, Thomas
Suffield/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Peoples document

Here's where I am:

Kay


You are invited to join them for lunch.
1:00 - 2:00


Please give me a call and we can discuss.  Shari is now definately moving to
power trading (not public yet) so we really need to figure out how we are
going to cover all the bases - short and long term.  I will be out the 14th
through the 17th and plan to be in S.A. the last week in March.  It would be
grea if we could both be there for the second seminar (looks like the more
pertinent to our issues) but I hate to think of Carol left all by herself
that much.  Let's see what we can figure out to make sure everything is
covered.

Sara Shackleton
03/01/2000 07:43 AM
To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kaye Ellis/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Trip to Brazil

Mark:  I have been in touch with Sami Arap who is now Andrea Bertone's boss.
There are currently two seminars scheduled in Sao Paulo aimed for the
commercial group and the lawyers as follows:

1.  March 17 - Milbank Tweed  (Securitization)
2.  March 27 - Bracewell (legal issues for contracts)

I think I should attend these and was considering a trip to arrive before the
start and after the termination of the seminars (approx March 15 - March
28).  In the interim I could (hopefully) wrap up financial issues with
Tozzini and address at length physical issues with Tozzini.  Also, I can
speak with commercial groups and plan a "swap"seminar for the commercial and
legal groups (date TBD but probably after the legal seminar in San Antonio).
Please let me know if the timing works for our group in Houston and if you
have other thoughts.   Hope all is well.  Sara


New Energy Secretary Guesses He Ought To Read Up On Energy

WASHINGTON, DC-- Spencer Abraham, the newly installed U.S. Energy Secretary,
admitted Monday that he probably ought to read up on energy. "I know energy
is really important, and that there was a big crisis back in the '70s, but
other than that, I'm in the dark," Abraham said. "I was hoping to be
appointed Secretary of Transportation, which I know a lot more about, but
that one was already taken." The former Michigan senator said he plans to go
to the library Thursday to look up "Energy" in The World Book Encyclopedia.


What about 573679, 579822, 579826 and the 2 transmission deals that are in
Enpower?  I will change them as soon as Sam gets the CP set up if its okay
with you.  Then I can tell Kim Hundle to resend the confirms.

   Kate Symes                04/17/2001 11:34 AM

To: Rhonda L Denton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Sierra Pacific Holding Company, dba Siera Pacific Industries

Thanks for following up on this, Rhonda. I believe you just spoke with Chris
about the executed original of this contract. Please let me know what else I
can do to speed this process along. I ran a search for deals the West
Services desk has done with this counterparty (which were entered with Sierra
Pacific Industries, Inc.) and came up with only three deal numbers. They are:

580832
580137
580136

Would you like me to change these over? Or are you doing that along with the
re-confirmation? Please let me know when you get a chance.

Thanks,
Kate

Rhonda L Denton
04/17/2001 09:19 AM
To: Genia FitzGerald/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel
Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward Sacks/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Kimberly Hundl/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sharen Cason/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Ann
Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Sierra Pacific Holding Company, dba Siera Pacific Industries

Because of credit reasons, the name above will remain the name under the
contract.  Global Counterparty has agreed to set up this dba as listed on the
contract.  Once this CP has been set up, I will need the trades moved to this
CP and the deals will need to be reconfirmed in the accurate name.

If there are no objections, I will move the deals and instruct the confirm
person to resend the confirms.  I will also move the contract to this new
name.  Genia will prepare the amendment covering just the change in the
credit provisions.

If Portland holds the fully executed original, please forward to me at your
earliest convenience.  If you have any questions or further instructions,
please contact me at X35871.


Did you forget something in your email?


----- Forwarded by Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT on 12/14/2000 09:36 AM -----

	William S Bradford
	12/14/2000 09:32 AM

		 To: Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: PG&E Guaranty/Enron Energy

---------------------- Forwarded by William S Bradford/HOU/ECT on 12/14/2000
08:34 AM ---------------------------

"Barker, Joe" <joe.barker@neg.pge.com> on 12/14/2000 09:24:59 AM
To: "'wbradfo@enron.com'" <wbradfo@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: FW: PG&E Guaranty/Enron Energy

Bill,
Here is the draft we discussed for your review.  I assume it is ok but let
me know if you want any further changes.
Thanks,
Joe

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hein, Jennifer
> Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2000 10:15 AM
> To: 'wbradfo@enron.com'
> Cc: Ford, John E.; Barker, Joe; Sarti, Daniel
> Subject: PG&E Guaranty/Enron Energy
>
> Attached is the form of guaranty we propose to issue.  As you discussed
> with Joe Barker, this form is based on the guaranty issued to other Enron
> entities on January 15, 1999.
>
> Please verify for us the name and contact information for the Guaranteed
> Party.  (I was advised that PG&E Energy Services Corporation changed its
> name to  Enron Energy Marketing Corp.)
>
>  <<Guar 121300.doc>>
> Jennifer A. Hein
> Assistant General Counsel
> PG&E National Energy Group
> Phone: (301) 280-6326
> Fax: (301) 280-6060
>

 - Guar 121300.doc


She also wants us too insret the prices in their


PLEASE READ THIS IMPORTANT INFORMATION CONCERNING THE ENRON STOCK FUND IN THE ENRON CORP. SAVINGS AND ESOP PLANS

On Friday, January 11, trading of Enron stock was suspended on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE).  All Savings and ESOP Plan transactions, including 401(k) payroll contributions,  involving this fund were placed in a pending status until trading resumed.

As announced by Enron's Office of the Chair on Wednesday, January 16, Enron stock would now be traded Over The Counter (OTC).  Upon receiving this information, work began immediately to develop a process that allows for OTC trades in the plans.

On Thursday, January 17, Enron initiated a process to facilitate OTC trades of Enron stock inside the 401(k) and ESOP and all pending transactions were processed using Thursday's closing price.

Now that trading has resumed, we urge you to review your investment elections to ensure that they are consistent with your investment goals.

As things change, we will continue to update you.

Enron Benefits Department


Do  you want to Accept Credit Cards
for your Online business or store front?

What is A Merchant Account?
- A merchant account is what you need to be able to accept
credit cards for sales or services.

Why do I need a Merchant account?
- Being able to accept credit cards for purchases make it much
easier and faster for your long distance customers.

Do I need to have an established store to get a merchant account?
-  No. It does not mater what you sell, at auction or on your
web site or even in your store front. we offer different account
to suite your personal needs.

What are your fee's?
-  Just like every person is unique, every account we sell is
unique to you and your business, therefore we can not state a
price until we know more about the account you need.<br>

How Do I get a merchant account?
-  All you need to do to get a merchant account is fill out the
form bellow and one of your reps. will call you with more information or get you started.

Can I call you instead?
-  We have in the past given a number to call for more information and to sign up, but the number of calls we where getting was too large and our customers where complaining about being on hold too long or not getting through at all. Therefore we now have a structure system of sales reps calling each and every customer in order of there submission to help them out.  We have found this system much more productive and less chaotic.

    I hope I have answered all your questions about Merchant Accounts and how to get one,  but if I have not please fill out the application, one of our sales reps will answer any other questions you may have

APPLY  NOW!
Simply send your
NAME:
and
PHONENUMBER:

Thank you for your time.
The Merchant People.

To be removed from our lists please reply to this email with remove in the subject line. We are sorry if this email has caused any complications.


Unbelieveable. Call me tonight 7139736325
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


u find it?  bond is $25K.  reg is $1K.  jeff


---------------------- Forwarded by Stephanie Miller/Corp/Enron on 12/01/2000
08:33 AM ---------------------------

	Enron de Mexico

	From:  Barbara Martinez                           11/30/2000 07:51 PM

To: Stephanie Miller/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John Hodge/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Jaime Williams/NA/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Meeting with Cementos de Chihuahua

Just to inform you  in case you want to join Jaime Williams, the Meeting with
Cementos Chihuahua it is scheduled next Tuesday, December 5  at 11:00 a.m.
And  will take place in the Cementos Chihuahua's office.

Address:
Vicente Su?rez y 6a. Avenida
Chihuahua, Chih.
Ph. (14)24-0090 /(14)24-0408

If you need of further assistance, please let me know.

Regards,
Barbara


Do you mean that we should include a rep re the fact that they're not a transmitting utility in the Master Netting Agreement?  The MNA has already been executed, and there is no such rep in the agreement.  Is this a rep that should be included in our form of MNA?  If so, I'll need to let Mary Cook know that the form needs to be revised.

As per Mary Cook's e-mail of last week, I believe that Marie Heard and/or Tana Jones will centralize the process of obtaining the organizational ID numbers.  Marie, please confirm with Lech.

Leslie

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Lech Kalembka" <Lech.Kalembka@cwt.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Monday, November 12, 2001 9:43 AM
To:	Hansen, Leslie
Cc:	Heard, Marie; Cook, Mary; David Mitchell
Subject:	RE: FW:

You should probably ask them about their status as a transmitting utility.
They should provide a related representation in the agreement.

Insofar as we are working on numerous filings, I wonder if it would be
efficient to "centralize" the process of obtaining the organizational ID
numbers with my paralegal, who, as previously noted, can get the numbers
from CT Corp.  As you know, this will cost $12 per entity, but might well
save money by streamlining the process.  Please advise.

Thank you.

Lech Kalembka
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft
100 Maiden Lane
New York, NY  10038
Tel.: (212) 504-6918
Fax: (212) 504-6666
E-mail: lech.kalembka@cwt.com

                    Leslie.Hansen
                    @enron.com           To:     Lech.Kalembka@cwt.com,
                    Office:              Marie.Heard@enron.com
                                         cc:
                    11/12/2001           Subject:     RE: FW:
                    10:18 AM

Lech:

   Attached please find the Collateral Annex to the Reliant Master Netting
   Agreement -- didn't realize you needed to see it as well.  By this
   e-mail, I am requesting that Marie coordinate with you to get you
   Reliant's organizational ID number.  How do I go about confirming that
   Reliant Energy Services, Inc. is not a transmitting utiltity?

   Local counsel will handle the Canadian entity.

   Regards,

   Leslie Hansen

   (See attached file: Reliant MNA Collateral Annex FINAL.doc)

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   "Lech Kalembka" <Lech.Kalembka@cwt.com>@ENRON
   Sent:   Saturday, November 10, 2001 7:03 PM
   To:     Hansen, Leslie
   Cc:     Cook, Mary; David Mitchell
   Subject:  Re: FW:

   As a threshold  matter, I note that the basic purpose of the UCC filings
   is
   to "belt and suspender" the cross-party netting provisions of the MNA by
   having the counterparty(ies) grant  a security interest in the
   counterparty's receivables from Enron.  This is typically accomplished
   through the grant  of a security interest in "Obligations" under the
   MNA.

   In this case, however, I do not find in the Collateral provisions
   (Section
   6) the Obligations included.  Is this collateral covered in a related
   Collateral Annex?  Alternatively, is this omission an oversight , or a
   deliberate choice by the parties?  If we do intend to have a security
   interest in the counterparty's receivables, and these are not picked up
   in
   the CA, the MNA should be revised accordingly.

   Also, if we are going to file against the receivables, we will need to
   know
   the "organizational ID" number of Reliant Energy Services Inc., and its
   address.  Regarding the Canadian entity, I assume you will consult with
   local counsel.

   Finally, we would also need to confirm for UCC filing purposes that the
   Delaware entity is not a "transmitting utility", i.e., an entity
   primarily
   engaged in the production or transmission of electricity or the
   transmission of goods by pipeline.

   Thank you.

   Lech Kalembka
   Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft
   100 Maiden Lane
   New York, NY  10038
   Tel.: (212) 504-6918
   Fax: (212) 504-6666
   E-mail: lech.kalembka@cwt.com

                       "Hansen,
                       Leslie"                To:     Lech.Kalembka@cwt.com
                       <Leslie.Hansen@        cc:
                       ENRON.com>             Subject:     FW:
                       Office:

                       11/06/2001
                       12:54 PM

   As per my voice mail, Enron will enter into a Master Netting Agreement
   with Reliant.  The two Reliant entities that will be covered by the
   agreement are listed below.  RES is headquartered in Houston, Texas.

   Attached please find the latest draft of the MNA for your reference.
   <<Reliant Master Netting  Agmt v.3.doc>>

   Regards,

   Leslie Hansen
   Sr. Counsel
   713/853-6121
   >  -----Original Message-----
   > From:   Williams, Jason R (Credit)
   > Sent:   Tuesday, November 06, 2001 10:57 AM
   > To:     Hansen, Leslie
   > Subject:     RE:
   >
   > Reliant Energy Services, Inc. was incorporated in Delaware.
   >
   > Reliant Energy Services Canada, Ltd.  is a Canadian company, with
   > principal address at:  1510, 421 - 7 Ave SW
   >
   > Calgary, Alberta
   >
   > T2P 4K9
   >
   >  -----Original Message-----
   > From:   Hansen, Leslie
   > Sent:   Tuesday, November 06, 2001 10:33 AM
   > To:     Williams, Jason R (Credit)
   > Subject:
   >
   > Jay:
   >
   > I need the state of incorporation and principal place of business for
   > Reliant Energy Services, Inc. -- I know its PPoB is Houston but don't
   > know if it's incorporated in Texas or elsewhere -- and Reliant Energy
   > Services Canada, Ltd. so that I can initiate the lien searches.  Do
   > you happen to have this information?
   >
   > Leslie

   **********************************************************************
   This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
   and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
   the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure
   by
   others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
   authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
   reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and
   delete
   all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are
   not
   intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence
   a
   binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
   affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not
   be
   relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
   Thank you.
   **********************************************************************
   (See attached file: Reliant Master Netting  Agmt v.3.doc)

==============================================================================

   NOTE:  The information in this email is confidential and may be legally
   privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, you must not read,
   use or disseminate the information.  Although this email and any
   attachments are believed to be free of any virus or other defect
   that might affect any computer system into which it is received and
   opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is
   virus free and no responsibility is accepted by Cadwalader, Wickersham
   & Taft for any loss or damage arising in any way from its use.

==============================================================================

    - Reliant Master Netting  Agmt v.3.doc << File: Reliant Master Netting
   Agmt v.3.doc >>
(See attached file: Reliant MNA Collateral Annex FINAL.doc)

==============================================================================
NOTE:  The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, you must not read, use or disseminate the information.  Although this email and any attachments are believed to be free of any virus or other defect
that might affect any computer system into which it is received and opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by Cadwalader, Wickersham
& Taft for any loss or damage arising in any way from its use.

==============================================================================

 - Reliant MNA Collateral Annex FINAL.doc << File: Reliant MNA Collateral Annex FINAL.doc >>


Ben -

My answers are in Red.  Ross, can you answer the one on #6 compressor?

Mitch

Benjamin Rogers@ECT
10/24/2000 11:21 AM
To: Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: More Lincoln Questions

Mitch:
More questions on Lincoln.  These guys are only looking at Lincoln, so all of
these should be just Lincoln questions.  Thanks again!
Ben
---------------------- Forwarded by Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT on 10/24/2000
11:20 AM ---------------------------

"Michael P Cazaubon" <michael.cazaubon@exeloncorp.com> on 10/24/2000 11:06:42
AM
To: benjamin.rogers@enron.com
cc: "David L Stewart" <david.stewart@exeloncorp.com>
Subject: More Lincoln Questions

Ben,

Thanks for the response on the first set of questions on Lincoln.  Attached
are some additional ones that we would appreciate your help on

Thanks!
Mike Cazaubon

(See attached file: Exelon Lincoln Q&A 10-24-00.doc)

************************************************************************
This e-mail and any of its attachments may contain Exelon Corporation
proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject
to copyright belonging to the Exelon Corporation family of Companies.  This
e-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed.  If you are not the intended recipient of this
e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution,
copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments
to this e-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.  If you have
received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and
permanently delete the original and any copy of this e-mail and any
printout. Thank You.
************************************************************************


Murray would like everyone to plan to get an early start on the Memorial Day weekend !!

A pizza lunch will be provided to the floor at 12:00 noon on Friday.    Plan to enjoy lunch and then head home to enjoy the holiday.

HAPPY MEMORIAL DAY !!

(For those people who submit timesheets to Murray, please have them in by Thursday afternoon.)


Would it be possible for you to forward a corporate resolution indicating
that the signatory
 on the guaranty has full authorirization? Thanks in advance for your help

---------------------- Forwarded by Lauri GOODWYN/NYC/FIMAT on 11/12/2001
01:23 PM ---------------------------

Lauri GOODWYN   11/08/2001 10:54 AM
(Embedded image moved to file: pic24464.pcx)

To:   Sara.Shackleton@ENRON.com, sarah.wesner@enron.com,
      todd.warwick@enron.com
cc:

Subject:

apparently there has been a technical issue with the e mail i sent. it
hasnt picked up all of the changes. i am bolding instead of using
highlighting. the changes should be in para 1(b), 3(c), 4 and 7. i had a
question in para 6.

(See attached file: enronguarred.doc)

Fimat USA Inc., a member of the NASD and SIPC, and a broker dealer and futures commission merchant registered under U.S. laws, makes no representation or warranty regarding the correctness of any information contained herein, or the appropriateness of any transaction for any person.  Nothing herein shall be construed as a recommendation to buy or sell.  Except as indicated otherwise,  Fimat and the Fimat Group refer to all companies or divisions of companies owned directly by Societe General that include the "Fimat" name.  Not all products and transactions offered by Fimat are available from all companies of the Fimat Group.

 - pic24464.pcx
 - enronguarred.doc


-- Major League Baseball postpones plans to eliminate teams until 2003.
Watch CNN or log on to http://CNN.com /AOL Keyword: CNN for the latest news.

********** Exclusive CNN Video ************************************
Get a 14 day free trial to CNN's web exclusive Quickcast and Uncut.
Watch constantly updated online newscasts and unedited interviews with Real One.
Click here for more information http://www.cnn.com/quickcast/text
*******************************************************************

To unsubscribe from CNN.com's Breaking News E-Mail Alert, log on to:
http://cnn.com/EMAIL/breakingnews.html, go to http://cnn.com/email to
sign up for additional e-mail products

(c) 2002 Cable News Network, Inc.
An AOL Time Warner Company

CNN Interactive email id:24909145402262234


Today's IssueAlert Sponsors:

[IMAGE]

Looking for a billing engine to meet your company's complex billing needs?
Itron has the technology and industry knowledge it takes to deliver an
advanced and automated solution. Visit us at the CIS Conference to learn more
about the MV-PBS Billing and Financial Settlement System, the industry proven
solution for the critical needs of large revenue customer billing and
financial settlements.

www.itron.com
[IMAGE]

Are you looking to invest in, attract investors for, provide services to or
understand the business and technology dynamics of the hottest companies
emerging in the energy sector?   Attend the Energy Venture Fair, June 25 &
26, 2001, in Boston, MA and hear CEOs from 75 hot energy companies present
their business plans.  Complete event description available at
www.energyventurefair.comor call Nannette Mooney at (818) 888-4445, ext. 11.

[IMAGE]

"Global Power & Western U.S. Coal:  Domino Factors at Play in Today's Energy
Markets" is the theme of the 2001 Spring Pacific Coal Forum (Coal Forum'2001)
to be hosted by the Western Coal Council, June 4-6, 2001 in Park City, Utah.
Keynote Speakers include: Honorable Mike Leavitt, Governor, State of Utah;
Hitoshi Tagawa, Tokyo Electric Power Company; Eng. Jesus Buentello, Comision
Federal de Electricidad; Malcolm Thomas, Kennecott Energy Company; Manfred
Raschke, International Strategic Information Services (ISIS).
Contact Janet Gellici at (303) 431-1456 or info@westcoal.org
www.westerncoalcouncil.org.

[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
May 17, 2001

Presidents Bush (Former and Current) Speak on Energy Issues

By Will McNamara
Director, Electric Industry Analysis

[IMAGE]Introduced and sponsored by LODESTAR Corp.'s CEO Chris Hamilos,
President George Herbert Walker Bush delivered the keynote presentation this
morning at the 25th Annual CIS Conference being held in Albuquerque, N.M. The
41st president of the United States spoke mostly from a personal perspective
about the highlights of his illustrious business and political career, and
reiterated his strong support for his son, President George W. Bush, whom he
affectionately refers to as "43" (as in 43rd president).

The former President Bush made it clear that he is now enjoying his
retirement and avoids making public statements regarding political policy.
However, the former president did field questions from the audience regarding
a few energy issues and acknowledged the parallels between the issues he
faced in his administration, and those that are presently challenging his
son. Much of the buzz throughout the conference focused on the current
president's just-released energy task plan, a 165-page report that outlines
approximately 105 steps that the new administration will take to address
current energy problems.

Former President Bush recalled the Gulf War and how one of the key issues
during that time was ensuring energy supply from Saudi Arabia. The former
president acknowledged that he felt compelled to launch the battle against
Saddam Hussein, who threatened the energy supplies needed to serve the world.
Further, President Bush referred to the political challenges he faced in his
presidency, during which time a predominantly Democratic Congress "that saw
the big picture issues in a different light" often made it difficult to find
common ground.

The former president made only brief (but rather significant) references to
his son's new energy policy. Having talked with Vice President Dick Cheney
last evening, former President Bush said he was aware that the new,
broad-based plan focused heavily on new supply, along with secondary measures
for conservation efforts. This is an approach that the former president fully
supports as he noted that "if you want to lower energy prices, you need to
establish more supply." In addition, the former president offered that
additional drilling efforts, an element of the plan that has sparked a great
deal of controversy, "has to happen" if the nation is truly committed to
increasing supply. However, former President Bush did suggest that the nation
must be patient as it will take "several years" to see any significant
decrease in energy prices as economic forces must be allowed to support new
development efforts.

Meanwhile, the energy task plan released by the current President Bush this
morning holds few surprises but continues to spark a great deal of debate. As
expected, the administration supports efforts for increased drilling of oil
in Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, easing of clean-air rules that
should support increased power plant production and streamlining the permit
process for oil refinery expansion and construction. These platforms have
been in place for months and form the foundation for the energy plan.

However, new elements of the plan that have emerged just within the last few
days are raising the most eyebrows. For instance, the extent to which nuclear
power factors into the administration's energy plan is perhaps greater than
was previously anticipated. Specifically, the Bush plan proposes the
extension of the life for aging nuclear plants and the use of so-called
"breeder reactors," which use spent nuclear fuel. Breeder reactors, although
rather common in Europe and Japan, have not been used in the United States
since the 1970s, when it was discovered that the reactors tend to produce
nuclear weapon-grade plutonium as a by-product.

Other key elements of the plan include:

Providing eminent domain authority to the federal government, which would
supersede states' rights to approve new transmission line capacity.
Expediting the license procedures for hydroelectric and geothermal plants.
Streamlining the approval process for power plant siting, and speeding up the
relicensing requirements for nuclear plants.
Drafting legislation to cap emissions of nitrogen oxide and mercury, which
are common by-products of coal-fired production. In turn, the Bush
administration supports exploring new clean-coal technologies, which should
increase production by coal-fired generating plants.
A further study of the current restrictions put into place by the Clean Air
Act, which presently limits the production at oil refineries and power
plants. The issue here is whether or not such restrictions should be lifted
or reduced so that additional oil and power production can be pursued.

As has been the case since the start of the new administration, the
continuing criticism of the new Bush plan is that it is overly specific and
strong on new supply efforts, while remaining vague and noncommittal to
conservation efforts. However, the specific conservation proposals in the
energy plan include providing consumers $4 billion in tax credits through
2007 to encourage the purchase of high-mileage, gas-electric hybrid vehicles.
In addition, President Bush has proposed providing tax benefits to
co-generation plants, which produce both heat and electricity. Others,
including the current president's father, might argue that conservation
efforts have received just the right amount of attention in the new plan as
market forces (high prices) already are driving renewed conservation across
the country.

Just as former President Bush faced a predominantly Democratic Congress that
often thwarted his policy measures, the current President Bush continues to
buck heads with Democrats in Washington who are crafting their own energy
plan. In fact, just two days ago, a group of House Democrats led by House
Minority Leader Richard Gephardt (D-Miss.) outlined a plan that calls for
increased oil drilling and building new pipelines to transport natural gas
(both of which run rather parallel to the Bush plan). However, Democrats have
focused more heavily on conservation efforts in their own plan, as
illustrated by a series of tax incentives to help consumers build energy
efficient homes and purchase hybrid gas and electric automobiles.
Consequently, the energy issues continue to sharply divide the two parties,
although in reality there may enough commonality among Republicans and
Democrats to support cooperation in Congress. That cooperation may be
necessary as Congress must approve President Bush's energy plan in order for
it to take effect.

TOMORROW: Summary of CIS Conference and analysis of key IT issues facing the
energy industry.

An archive list of previous IssueAlerts is available at
www.scientech.com

[IMAGE]
The most comprehensive, up-to-date map of the North American Power Systemby
RDI/FT Energy is now available from SCIENTECH.

Reach thousands of utility analysts and decision makers every day. Your
company can schedule a sponsorship of IssueAlert by contacting Nancy Spring
via e-mail or calling (505)244-7613. Advertising opportunities are also
available on our website.
SCIENTECH is pleased to provide you with your free,  daily IssueAlert. Let us
know if we can help you with  in-depth analyses or any other SCIENTECH
information  products. If you would like to refer a colleague to receive our
free,  daily IssueAlerts, please reply to this email and include  their full
name and email address or register directly on our site.

If you no longer wish to receive this daily email, send a message to
IssueAlert, and include the word "delete" in the subject line.
SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts(SM) are compiled based on the  independent analysis
of SCIENTECH consultants. The opinions expressed in  SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts
are not intended to predict financial performance  of companies discussed, or
to be the basis for investment decisions of any  kind. SCIENTECH's sole
purpose in publishing its IssueAlerts is to offer  an independent perspective
regarding the key events occurring in the  energy industry, based on its
long-standing reputation as an expert on  energy issues.

Copyright 2001. SCIENTECH, Inc. All rights  reserved.


Soussan,

My assistant, Shirley Crenshaw, will call you regarding the time of the
meeting.
Right now the afternoon is open.

I look forward to meeting you on the 19th.

Vince

"Faiz, Soussan" <faizs@texaco.com> on 03/30/2000 02:31:18 PM
To: "'vkamins@enron.com'" <vkamins@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Houston visit

Dear Vince,

Greetings from NY & hope all is well.  As you may recall from the ROG real
options conference in NY, I'd indicated the opportunity to visit with you
next time I'm in Houston.  I'll be there during 4/18-4/21 & wonder if we can
pls meet on Wed. 4/19 in your offices.  Would appreciate it if you can pls
let me know whether you're available then (I'm flexible on the schedule
particulars).  If not, pls let me know whether 4/18 (afternoon), 4/20
(afternoon), or 4/21 (morning) will work for you.

I really look forward to the opportunity & would appreciate to learn more
about how you've instigated the real options thinking in Enron and
especially its integration within the organizational & incentive matters.

Many thanks,
Soussan Faiz
Mgr. of Global Valuation Services
Texaco Inc.
(914) 253-4187


------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following message was sent to you as an opt-in subscriber to
Naviant. We will continue to bring you valuable offers on
the products and services that interest you most. If you wish to
unsubscribe please copy and paste the following link into your web
browser or click here:
http://mx01.opt-in-net.net/cgi-bin/optout2.cgi?email=PMIMS@ENRON.COM&eid=1-2Q-3ga-9961U
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Put the Internet to Work for You!
----------------------------------------------------
Earn continuous residual income for the rest of your life!
We'll help you do it!

It's easy to turn the internet into your own 24/7 business and earn an
executive's salary!

Financial freedom is only a click away!

http://mx01.opt-in-net.net/fcgi-bin/eclick.cgi?cm=7856&link=38012&em=98599378&eid=1-2Q-3ga-9961U

AOL Members
Click Here

This email message may be a recurring mailing.
Ref# 1-2Q-3ga-9961U


You need to discuss this with the East Desk.  See if Tetco allocated the vol
to their contract.

D

Jackie Young
07/11/2000 09:07 AM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: 98-6892 (Sitara Deal 319063)

The above deal is a DD deal effective 7/1/2000-7/5/2000.  Can the deal be
extended to the 6th to cover flow of .803 decatherms?

We've not yet received the OBA from TETCO yet.

Thanks
-Jackie-
3-9497


We did receive this from David.

David Haug@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
12/13/2000 02:14 PM
To: Kenneth Lay/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: Succession Plan

Congratulations on making this not-unexpected move in a smooth, upbeat and
highly positive way, with what looks like excellent timing and a clean
handoff. I know Jeff will have all of our strong support as he expands his
role.
  Since I left for my wedding and honeymoon just before Thanksgiving nothing
has happened on the Sports Authority stuff - - -we are still awaiting some
promised deliverables from Mr Campo. Yesterday I relit the fire on our V&E
team to start nudging him gently. No action on your part needed at present -
- -I'll keep you informed. I'll be pushing to get this resolved by mid
January in a manner that works for the Sports Authority and the financings
without upseting our partners. - - -DLH

Sent by: Enron Announcements@ENRON
To: All Enron Worldwide
cc:

Subject: Succession Plan

It is my great pleasure to announce that the Board has accepted my
recommendation to appoint Jeff Skilling as chief executive officer, effective
at the time of their next board meeting on February 12, 2001.  Jeff will also
retain his duties as president and chief operating officer.  I will continue
as chairman of the Board and will remain at Enron, working with Jeff on the
strategic direction of the company and our day-to-day global operations.

Jeff will assume the role at a time when the company is hitting on all
cylinders and is positioned for phenomenal growth.  He is clearly ready for
the job, and after 15 years as CEO of this great company, I,m ready for a
somewhat different role.

Our succession plan has been clear for some time.  This has afforded Jeff and
me the freedom to combine our strengths toward building a company that
continues to exceed everyone,s expectations, including our own.  We look
forward to furthering that relationship as Jeff expands his role.

There are no plans for any other changes in our management team nor broad
shifts in strategy and direction.

Please join me in congratulating Jeff.  I look forward to a great 2001.


Bob,

You can address messages to me as:

Vince.J. Kaminski@enron.com   (not Kaminsky).

or

vkamins@enron.com.

Sorry for the confusion.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/27/2000
08:11 AM ---------------------------

Robert Brooks <rebrooks@earthlink.net> on 03/24/2000 12:05:58 PM
Please respond to "rebrooks@rbac.com" <rebrooks@rbac.com>
To: "'vkamins@enron.com'" <vkamins@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: FW: Returned mail: User unknown

Apparently this one doesn't work either.
Bob Brooks

-----Original Message-----
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem [SMTP:MAILER-DAEMON@earthlink.net]
Sent: Friday, March 24, 2000 9:56 AM
To: rebrooks@earthlink.net
Subject: Returned mail: User unknown

The original message was received at Fri, 24 Mar 2000 09:56:19 -0800 (PST)
from adsl-63-198-129-100.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [63.198.129.100]

   ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<Vince.Kaminsky@enron.com>

   ----- Transcript of session follows -----
... while talking to mailman.enron.com.:
>>> RCPT To:<Vince.Kaminsky@enron.com>
<<< 550 <Vince.Kaminsky@enron.com>... User unknown
550 <Vince.Kaminsky@enron.com>... User unknown

 - ATT00005.att
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Robert Brooks <rebrooks@earthlink.net>
To: "Vince Kaminski (E-mail)" <Vince.Kaminsky@enron.com>
Subject: FW: From powermarketers.com:  New England Natural Gas Growth
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 10:02:38 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

New England's Natural Gas Industry Reaches New Growth Levels
( March 23, 2000 )
(relayed by Bob Brooks, GPCM Natural Gas Market Forecasting System)
PROVIDENCE, R.I., March 23 /PRNewswire/ -- The natural gas industry in New
England continues its fast rate of growth, in terms of new customers and
new supply capabilities, industry and government leaders learned today at
The New England Gas Association's annual Energy Conference held at The
Westin Hotel in Providence.
Alfred P. Degen, chairman of The New England Gas Association, and chairman,
president and chief executive officer of Valley Gas Company, based in
Cumberland, Rhode Island, said: "The interest in natural gas has never been
stronger in New England. We look forward to continued growth in the years
ahead, to bring reliable, efficient, and cost-effective natural gas to
homes and businesses throughout the region."
This growth in New England is reflected in such developments as:
* A 25% growth in the region's pipeline infrastructure over the last year:
-- two new pipelines from Canada - the Portland Natural Gas Transmission
System (PNGTS), and the Maritimes & Northeast Pipeline from Nova
Scotia;
-- system expansions by the region's transmission and local distribution
companies;
* A new supply of liquefied natural gas (LNG) from the Caribbean:
-- the Cabot LNG Corporation's Atlantic LNG Project made first
deliveries to New England in May 1999;
-- LNG deliveries to New England in 1999 were more than double 1998
levels;
* There are more natural gas customers in New England than ever before:
-- NEGA reports that New England now has over 2.2 million natural gas
customers, from homeowners to small and large businesses;
-- The region's gas utilities reached a new record sendout of gas on
January 17, 2000, reaching 3.4 billion cubic feet (Bcf), a 13%
increase over the previous record.
"Over the past year," said Degen, "the New England natural gas industry
installed more new miles of pipelines than it has in decades. Whole areas
of New England are gaining access to gas for the first time, and the rest
of the region is receiving substantial new supplies as well."
The Conference was attended by more than 300 industry and government
officials. In his keynote address, Gary L. Neale, chairman, president and
CEO of NiSource, Inc., and chairman of the American Gas Association
(A.G.A.), reported on the national natural gas market projections found in
A.G.A.'s recent study, "Fueling the Future." Neale noted that increased
natural gas demand has multiple national benefits, including:
environmental, energy security, trade, and economic development.
NEGA, based in Needham, Massachusetts, was established in 1926. Its
membership includes all of New England's local natural gas utilities, the
interstate pipeline companies, a liquefied natural gas (LNG) importer, and
over 280 associate member companies. The natural gas utilities serve over
2.2 million customers in 490 communities in New England.


I spoke with Donna Bobbish this morning about Steve's question -- does the
President have broader authority to take action during times of crisis.
Donna sent me this quick write up about what she has looked into so far.
Because these questions go beyond a FERC practitioner's expertise, we asked
Donna to work with a Constitutional Law expert at V&E to determine whether,
and under what circumstances, the President's authority may be extended
beyond the authorities discussed in the memo.

We will let you know what we learn from that further research.

Sarah

----- Forwarded by Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron on 05/23/2001 03:48 PM -----

	"Bobbish, Donna J." <dbobbish@velaw.com>
	05/23/2001 12:16 PM

		 To: "'snovose@enron.com'" <snovose@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Presidential Power Question

Sarah:  In response to Steve's inquiry, I did look into this question
briefly when you first gave me the assignment.  I read an interesting law
review article  on "The Imposition of Martial Law in the United States," for
a discussion of presidential powers.  There is no general emergency
authority granted the President in the U.S.  Constitution.  Also, the
article discussed the famous "Truman steel mills case," Youngstown Sheet &
Tube Co. v. Sawyer, 343 U.S. 579 (1952), in which the Supreme Court declared
unconstitutional President Truman's seizure of the steel mills during the
Korean War.  In that case, in light of a threatened national-wide strike in
the national steel industry, President Truman, concerned about the national
defense, issued an Executive Order directing the Secretary of Commerce to
take possession of most of the steel mills and keep them running.  The
Supreme Court said that if the President had authority to take such  an
action, he had to derive it either from an act of Congress or the
Constitution itself.  Since the Supreme Court could not find any seizure
authority, it invalidated the President's action.  The Supreme Court also
rejected the argument that the President had any powers that could be
implied from the aggregate of his powers under the Constitution.

Based on the Truman steel mills case, I thought it the wiser course of
action to look for specific authorities given to the President by statute
which might prove useful.

I could look into this question further, if you would like, but we would be
entering "martial law-type" legal territory, where the President would be
acting outside of specific Constitutional or congressional authority (which
has been described a "zone of twilight"), and in light of the Truman steel
mills case, I don't know how fruitful that might be.

Please let me know if you would like me to do anything more.  Thank you.
Donna
          ++++++CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE+++++
The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged.  This
email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization
named above.  If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized
representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any,
or the information contained herein is prohibited.  If you have received
this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email
and delete this email from your system.  Thank You


I will return to work on 8/20.  Cara will be scheduling Light load COB and Light load MIDC while I am gone.

Thank you.

Donald


FYI

I am currently out of books.  I should be getting some more in today.  As
soon as they come in, I will make sure you get a copy.

-Brenda

---------------------- Forwarded by Brenda Flores-Cuellar/HOU/ECT on
02/23/2000 04:26 PM ---------------------------
To: Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sandra F
Brawner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Grigsby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Keith Holst/HOU/ECT@ect, Brian
Hoskins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dick Jenkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peter F Keavey/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrew H Lewis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas A
Martin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg McClendon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brad McKay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carey
M Metz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah Mulholland/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eva
Pao/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim Schwieger/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth Shim/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, Geoff Storey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fletcher J
Sturm/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patricia Tlapek/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: RE: Options Training Classes

For those of you who did not see the memos from Jeff that went out on
February 17th. & February 22nd. regarding the upcoming Options training
classed, I have attached both memos below:

I have the books at my desk for those of you that have not received your
copy.

There will be a third memo in the next couple of days with regards to the
location of the classes.

If you have any other questions, please feel free to contact me.

-Brenda
x31914


Yes Bobbie, I will confirm that but hopefully not for long.  : )

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ayers, Lesley
Sent:	Wednesday, September 26, 2001 10:42 AM
To:	Campbell, Bobbie
Cc:	Davis, Dana; Lamb, Marnie
Subject:	DASHes

Bobbie,  I am no longer in Portfolio Reporting.

Going forward, please send all DASHes to DANA DAVIS @ x-37520, EB2391d.

She will be responsible for this function.

Thank you,
Lesley Ayers 713.345.7209


MILLS,SCOTT R  has suggested reviewers and submitted them for your approval.
You may review/modify this list of reviewers by logging on to PEP at
http://pep.corp.enron.com  and going to Supervisor Services.  Please
remember, no feedback can be completed on MILLS,SCOTT R  until you have
approved the list.


Effective Monday, November 19, Mark Haedicke will office in the new building.  His location will be:  ECS 06788 (sixth floor, office number 788).

My new location will be ECS 06785 (just outside Mark's office).

Our telephone numbers and fax number will remain the same.

Janette Elbertson
Enron Wholesale Services
Legal Department
Telephone:  (713) 853-7906
Fax:  (713) 646-2600
e-mail:  janette.elbertson@enron.com


john j. lavorato
President and Chief Operating Officer
Enron Americas
1400 Smith Street
Houston, TX
77002

713-853-7991

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Frank Ricciuti" <fricciuti@dceg.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Frank+20Ricciuti+22+20+3Cfricciuti+40dceg+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Sunday, February 04, 2001 11:02 AM
To:	John Lavorato
Subject:	Need your tel. info etc.

Hi John. It was really good to hear from you. As  well I think you have a good idea of what I think of your corporate success. Not  to take away, in any way, what I think of you and the family on a personal  basis. give them all my love.

John, I did send you the article on David Cassie's  compensation at CIBC World Markets.

Could you e-mail me your new title [to update my files] and  business address.

Thanks

Uncle Frank.