I got this from some hunter friends.  Thought you would like to read it.

DG    3-9573
---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 09/19/2000
10:15 AM ---------------------------

Alton Smith <altsmith@cisco.com> on 09/15/2000 08:25:26 AM
To: mail143232@pop.net
cc: byd@digitex.net, david_craft@wbw-pc.com, imopiano@io.com,
geoterri@flash.net, ghammond@mdavidlowe.com, jeff_graham@condley.com,
Mfowler1@airmail.net, nealk@wt.net, randy.g.kruger.jr@arthuranderson.com,
sschroed@us.ca-indosuez.com, b3wells@aol.com, Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT,
dennis.patrick@telops.gte.com, Abel_Acosta@cca.court.state.tx.us,
mail143232@pop.net, randy@mcdonaldinc.com, Eric.Gunther@sabre.com,
eric.kupper@sabre.com, rambo1@oknet1.net, ClintonMur@aol.com,
wwhent@lipan.net, Sgt_Maj@email.msn.com, fbarowsk@cisco.com,
jeff@huntingwithjeff.com
Subject: Fwd: Fw: Senate Bill SB-2099

Sorry for the wide distribution.  However, I thought all my hunting buddies
should be aware of what's going on.  Who knows we may be asked to register
sling shots in the future.

Thanks

>From: "Jim  Hamilton" <jrham@worldnet.att.net>
>To: "Alton Smith" <altsmith@cisco.com>
>Subject: Fw: Senate Bill SB-2099
>Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2000 07:45:34 -0500
>X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5
>
>This along with the other smoke and mirrors is becoming the norm for our
>Government. WHY do they fear honest law abiding citizens exercising their
>2nd amendment constitutional rights? If anyone thinks that the NRA is a
>little club of paranoid reactive, they should review their feelings. Send
>this on to everyone you know.  It is time to vote and let these individuals,
>that suppose they are above the law and can rewrite and violate our
>constitutional rights, know they are mistaken. These people know it would be
>very difficult to eliminate our rights through the front door and in the
>light of day. They will seek any and all methods to accomplish these agendas
>behind the scenes.
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Martin Burnett <mtdburnett@hotmail.com>
>To: barandbag@mediaone.net <barandbag@mediaone.net>; P015@persnet.navy.mil
><P015@persnet.navy.mil>; GRANATHA@aol.com <GRANATHA@aol.com>;
>allanwendt@hotmail.com <allanwendt@hotmail.com>; ahansen367@home.com
><ahansen367@home.com>; rjwolfe@mlt.uspa-ira.com <rjwolfe@mlt.uspa-ira.com>;
>flyov10s@aol.com <flyov10s@aol.com>; perrymm89@yahoo.com
><perrymm89@yahoo.com>; cnaarndt@aol.com <cnaarndt@aol.com>; mamzic1@aol.com
><mamzic1@aol.com>; smokinf18@aol.com <smokinf18@aol.com>;
>davidson.morse@morgankeegan.com <davidson.morse@morgankeegan.com>;
>Doerings2@aol.com <Doerings2@aol.com>; DDBaggett@aol.com
><DDBaggett@aol.com>; keprice95@aol.com <keprice95@aol.com>; stearns@hctc.net
><stearns@hctc.net>; smithgh@rocketmail.com <smithgh@rocketmail.com>;
>greg.fred@juno.com <greg.fred@juno.com>; delvoeg@aol.com <delvoeg@aol.com>;
>jrham@worldnet.att.net <jrham@worldnet.att.net>; jrham51@yahoo.com
><jrham51@yahoo.com>; btarlton@aol.com <btarlton@aol.com>;
>jeffhardee@hotmail.com <jeffhardee@hotmail.com>; Mitch3p@aol.com
><Mitch3p@aol.com>; bchdriver1@aol.com <bchdriver1@aol.com>;
>jeffrey.kuhn@autozone.com <jeffrey.kuhn@autozone.com>; jwconnors@aol.com
><jwconnors@aol.com>; johnnycme@aol.com <johnnycme@aol.com>;
>pjschmitt@fedex.com <pjschmitt@fedex.com>; JBrown8245@aol.com
><JBrown8245@aol.com>; Delta75@aol.com <Delta75@aol.com>; KAPD39@aol.com
><KAPD39@aol.com>; Ringledoc1@aol.com <Ringledoc1@aol.com>;
>Raymo1@ix.netcom.com <Raymo1@ix.netcom.com>; prendad@aol.com
><prendad@aol.com>; r.r.cameron@worldnet.att.net
><r.r.cameron@worldnet.att.net>; RayfieldRS@hqda.army.mil
><RayfieldRS@hqda.army.mil>; ronbo@newbernnc.com <ronbo@newbernnc.com>;
>PILOTFA@aol.com <PILOTFA@aol.com>; SMcNabb@ENERGY.TWC.com
><SMcNabb@ENERGY.TWC.com>; scotkilt@m3.sprynet.com <scotkilt@m3.sprynet.com>;
>wedgewise@aol.com <wedgewise@aol.com>; stevesande@aol.com
><stevesande@aol.com>; vsorlie@home.com <vsorlie@home.com>; weshope@juno.com
><weshope@juno.com>
>Date: Thursday, September 14, 2000 10:53 PM
>Subject: Senate Bill SB-2099
>
>
>>FRIENDS,
>>PLEASE FORGIVE THE LARGE LIST.  THIS COULD BE A BIG DEAL TO SOME OR ALL OF
>>YOU.  AN OLD AND RELIABLE MARINE FRIEND OF MINE SENT THIS.  TAKE A LOOK AND
>>ACT ACCORDING TO YOUR OWN CONSCIENCE.
>>THANKS,
>>MARTY
>>
>>
>>>From: "Joe & Norma Morris" <sbeanokie@tah-usa.net>
>>>To: Undisclosed-Recipient:;@tah-usa.net
>>>Subject: Senate Bill SB-2099
>>>Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 19:56:58 -0500
>>>
>>>Got this last night,
>>>Thought  all you guys who may not have known before would like to see what
>>>is going on behind the scenes  with the IRS now. Very disturbing
>>>Bill
>>>---- Original Message -----
>>>From: Bryant L. Metler
>>>To: Zana Smith
>>>Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2000 8:38 PM
>>>Subject: Be aware, Bill -- The following message is for you and freedom
>>>loving Oklahomans
>>>
>>>
>>>The following was forwarded to me today by my son David;  we will
>>>immediately begin the battle against this end-run around the Constitution
>>>!!!
>>>
>>>Subject:  Fw: This is not good!
>>>
>>>I have read this Senate Bill, this message is serious.
>>>
>>>Tim
>>>
>>> > OK folks, time to let them know...Toll free number: 888-449-3511
>>> >
>>> > Senate Bill SB-2099 will require us to put on our 2000 1040 federal tax
>>> > form
>>> > all guns that you have or own. It may require fingerprints and a tax of
>>>$50
>>> > per gun.  This bill was introduced on Feb. 24. This bill will become
>>>public
>>> > knowledge 30 days after it is voted into law. This is an amendment to
>>>the
>>> > Internal Revenue Act of 1986. This means that the Finance Committee can
>>> > pass
>>> > this without the Senate voting on it at all. The full text of the
>>>proposed
>>> > amendment is on the U.S. Senate homepage. <http://www.senate.gov/>>> >
<http://www.senate.gov/> > You can find the bill by doing a search by
>>>the
>>> > bill number. (SB-2099)
>>> >
>>> > You know who to call; I strongly suggest you do.  Please send a copy of
>>> > this
>>> > e-mail to every gun owner you know to help.
>>> >
>>> > STOP this bill!!
>>>
>>
>>_________________________________________________________________________
>>Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
>>
>>Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
>>http://profiles.msn.com.
>>
>>
>
Alton Smith

Systems Engineer
Global Systems Integrators
Cisco Systems

Office:  972-364-8802
Pager:  800-365-4578

http://www.cisco.com/go/uschannels/


Jeff, Greg and John,

Our old friend Tom Costantino is interested in coming back
to Enron. It seems that his move to NYMEX either will not happen
or will not happen for some time.

You can contact him at home:

Phone: (713) 860 8687 (h)

Vince


>> You signed up to receive special offers at Colonize.com <<

Joseph,

Type your last name in the FOUNDMONEY search engine
and see if you can find CASH that belongs to you...INSTANTLY!

Go look now! http://www.colonize.com/c.php3?i=fmnx3,10241,x2&e=33676806

This site has been featured on:

* "Oprah Winfrey",
* "Maury Povich",
* "Discovery Channel",
*  And many other TV and radio shows.

*  Search through 30 MILLION forgotten accounts
*  Records date back to the early 1900s..

Go look now! http://www.colonize.com/c.php3?i=fmnx3,10241,x2&e=33676806

True Story
------------------------------------------------------------------
Gail Sperry, from San Diego, California, searched FOUNDMONEY
and found $59,839.12, left by her deceased husband. Because
this was not in her husband's will, she would've never found
it had she not visited FOUNDMONEY

Facts
------------------------------------------------------------------
3 in 4 North American families own money that is LOST in banks,
insurance companies, etc. SOME OF IT MAY BE YOURS! Search
FOUNDMONEY Just type your last name in the search engine!
See if there is money you never knew you had...INSTANTLY!

Go look now! http://www.colonize.com/c.php3?i=fmnx3,10241,x2&e=33676806

~~~~~~~~~~
Questions? Comments? Email us at: info@colonize.com
You are currently subscribed as: joe.stepenovitch@enron.com
To unsubscribe visit:
http://www.colonize.com/u.php3?e=joe.stepenovitch@enron.com


Needs to be vetted with Herman at some point.  If Jake wants to negotiate
something else with GE, I'm all for it.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/16/2001 01:12
PM ---------------------------

Jake Thomas@ECT
03/16/2001 01:01 PM
To: Carlos Sole/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Stephen Thome/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: ENA/Hanover Compressor Company: Letter Agreement and LLC
Agreemen t

Has anyone given any more thought to the need for this structure with Hanover
?

From: Carlos Sole@ENRON on 03/16/2001 01:05 PM CST
To: Stephen Thome/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jake Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: ENA/Hanover Compressor Company: Letter Agreement and LLC Agreemen t

Attached are the form of Letter Agreement and LLC Agreement redacted for
Hanover for you all to forward.  As for the turbine contract, Stephen you
have a copy of that but may want to delete E-Next's name and anything else.


Cameron Sellers
Vice President, Business Development
PERFECT.COM
1860 Embarcadero Road - Suite 210
Palo Alto, CA 94303
cameron@perfect.com
650.798.3366 (direct dial)
650.269.3366 (cell)
650.858.1095 (fax)

-----Original Message-----
From:  JanelB3@aol.com [mailto:JanelB3@aol.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2000 1:10 PM
To: cameron@perfect.com
Subject: Re: Mexico OnLine

Dear Cameron
The dates you requested are open.
As you have  recognized from our website,  we have a lush, lovely, peaceful
garden oasis in an authentic historical pueblo that is also gaining interest
as  home to many artists and  others interested in living in a most unique
environment.  Our aim is to provide a memorable experience with modern
facilities that also reflect the beauty and comfort of Mexican rustic
design.  Our casitas have kitchens, baths and covered patios that afford
privacy and a renewing atmosphere.  Great care has been taken to provide
service and comfort.
Our prime season is approaching so it is well advised to book early. We have
a number of inquiries for the dates you requested.
The rates as described are $80 USD per night for the casita .which is
separate and very private. The weekly rate is $450 USD.  To hold a
reservation we require a 50% deposit when you have your exact dates. Let us
know what they are and I will mail instructions.
If this is your first time to this area or if there are any questions you
might have, please fell free to write. and I will do my best to answer. Our
community site for up to date events is www.todossantos.cc
Mil gracias for your inquiry.  Linda Macfarlane for Las Palmas Casitas


I do not have any negative information on any of these counterparties.

	Tana Jones
	11/17/2000 09:39 AM

		 To: Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: ClickPaper approvals (advance notice)

----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 11/17/2000 09:38 AM -----

	Camille Gerard@ENRON
	11/17/2000 09:29 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Noel Petterson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: ClickPaper approvals (advance notice)

Tana,

The counterparties below are about to be approved in Credit. It would be
great to get your Legal response before you leave for
vacation.  We can then minimize approvals that go through Mark Taylor next
week.

Thanks,
Camille
---------------------- Forwarded by Camille Gerard/Corp/Enron on 11/17/2000
09:22 AM ---------------------------

Walter Guidroz
11/16/2000 05:21 PM
To: Camille Gerard/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Noel Petterson/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: ClickPaper approvals (advance notice)

I'm waiting on Tom to review my credit recommendations for the counterparties
below.  Once he approves these, I'll send them to you.  Thanks!

ABC Salvage Corporation
Blue Heron Paper Company
Central National-Gottesman, Inc.
Clifford Paper Inc.
Clorox Services Company
Eagle Mountain Mills Ltd.
J-Mar Paper Sales
Linden Trading Company, Inc.
Perry H. Koplik & Sons, Inc.
Potlatch Corporation
Premier paper
Priority Pallet, Inc.
Ris Paper Co., Inc.
R.R. Donnelley & Sons Company
Sierra Pine A California Limited Partnership
The Ogden Newspapers, Inc.
The Princeton Packet, Inc.


Here are the new Plano numbers and the revised Homestead numbers.  Please
only use these for discussion and model purposes and not with client
conversations.  These are all indicative cost numbers.  Give me a call if you
have any questions.  Thanks
Ben
3-7998

---------------------- Forwarded by Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT on 05/04/2000
02:27 PM ---------------------------

Bruce Golden@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
05/04/2000 02:08 PM
To: Benjamin Rogers@ECT
cc:
Subject: Plano vs Homestead

Ben

This is a revised Plano we did late yesterday. It was adjusted from Lowell,
Mass Nepco estimate and we changed format to more closely match  Homestead
form.

Biggest differences 'tween original Plano and original Homestead were:

Homestead had dual fuel     +4M
Homestead had additional piling and foundation bulks  +1.8M
Homestead was connecting to a complicated t-line config +1.5M
Homestead had an FPL substation    +5M
Homestead did not need as much gas pipeline    -2.1M
Homestead used 6% margin     +4.4M
Homestead had lower capacity due to additional chilling  +1.5% (not capital
cost but does change $/kW)

Differences from original Plano to new Plano is that Nepco has estimated a
union job for Lowell. This impacts indirects upward by about $5M and
construction up above my earlier guesstimate by about $4M. I had doubled the
cost per manhour which Nepco also did but additionally they added manhours
for productivity loss. Additionally I moved new Plano margin to 6%.

New Homestead went up due to raw water pretreatment and first stage RO but we
dropped the substation cost so total estimated cost went down by a coupla of
million.

Numbers still just should be used for screening, no commitment.

These summaries should not be passed around.

Bruce


To:  Enron Employees
From:  Office of the Chief Executive
Date:  February 21, 2002
Re:  Management Changes

As a company working to emerge from bankruptcy, Enron looks and feels completely different.  However, one thing is the same - we continue to move and change at a fast pace.  Last week, we shared with you a developing management team.  This week, we want to update you on some further management changes that have taken shape.

Jim Derrick, executive vice president and general counsel, will retire from Enron effective March 1, 2002.

Rob Walls, currently deputy general counsel, will succeed Derrick and serve immediately as acting general counsel.

We are also happy to announce that Mike McConnell, formerly CEO of Enron Global Markets, is returning to the company to help identify and develop business opportunities within our remaining non-regulated businesses.

We will continue to share changes to the management team as they occur.


I have a meeting in a few minutes. Can we reschedule for later today or early tomorrow?
My cell is 713-705-1823.

Sara Shackleton
Enron Wholesale Services
1400 Smith Street, EB3801a
Houston, TX  77002
Ph:  (713) 853-5620
Fax: (713) 646-3490


Great minds....

---------------------- Forwarded by Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT on 11/29/2000 04:28
PM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Mason Hamlin                           11/29/2000 04:18 PM

To: Nick Hiemstra/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joseph Piotrowski/NA/Enron@Enron, John
House/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Gillette/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Swinney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Earnest/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michelle Bruce/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Zachary McCarroll/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
cc:
Subject: Priceless!

 - Priceless.jpg


PhotoWorks
Dear Gerald R,
Request a PhotoWorks preloaded 400 ASA, 27
exposure camera with flash for FREE, and you may
never have to buy a camera again!*: http://4at3.net/KC17318970.2522.0.2803  Every time you send your preloaded camera, along
with your order form and payment, to PhotoWorks,
we will:
  * Send you a replacement camera with your
    high-quality prints (which we've been developing
    and printing for over 23 years) in the mail.
  * E-mail you a link to your photos online so you
    can e-mail photos, create Online Albums and more!
Request a Preloaded Camera: http://4at3.net/KC17318970.2522.0.2803  Get your camera (a $6 value) for FREE! Pay only
$4.50 for shipping and handling costs.
With PhotoWorks, you're not only getting a great
deal, you're getting high-quality photos. For
developing prices, please go to: http://4at3.net/KC17318970.2522.0.350  Remember, you can send us any preloaded or single
use camera for developing, and we'll send you a
replacement PhotoWorks camera with your prints.

*Special pricing good until June 29, 2001 for
existing PhotoWorks customers only. Only one
camera per household, please.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
UNSUBSCRIBE:
To be removed from our mailing list, reply to this
message with REMOVE in your e-mail subject line.

If you have any questions about PhotoWorks' Online
Privacy Policy, please go to: http://4at3.net/KC17318970.2522.0.1231
[IMAGE]


Stan felt it would be appropriate for the Policy Committee to review the
attached changes to the Analyst / Associate PRC process, prior to execution.
In summary, the following modifications have been developed by the heads of
the AAPRC Committees (Horton, Kean, and Sherriff) and A/A Program Management
(Lemmons):

? Most cross-calibration will be at the business unit level, since this is
where the best interaction and information gathering occurs.  Steps to ensure
consistency across the business units are outlined in the memo.  The final
PRC meeting will focus on business unit ranking distributions, and the
names/attributes of the top performers across the company.
? The PRC committees have been expanded to improve the quality of
representation, and to reflect the diversity of our workforce.  The additions
were selected from a pool of high performing VPs and Directors.  To ensure
fairness, only VPs and Directors will provide representation on the AAPRC
Committee.
? An attachment has been included to clarify program tenure and promotion
criteria.

Please let me know if you have any questions or would like to discuss by
mid-day Wednesday, May 9.  We are planning to release this information to the
memo distribution list that evening.

Regards,
Billy


over the hedge, off the brick wall, nothing but neck

-----Original Message-----
From: T FEDER [mailto:lawfeder@msn.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 2:25 PM
To: erwollam; b c; c k; chet_fenner; c.r.zander@att.net; Parks, Joe; john.chambers@bisys.com; brianc; c_r_zander
Subject: Re: Man Night

i got your email thread right here, dog.  Hey does this really go the Park's enron email?  Cool!  I bet not, I bet it goes to L2q3r6ft Raptor partnership in the Caymans.  In fact, I bet Joe is not Joe at all, instead he Joe Lay.  You know the second gunman......hmmmmmm..

----- Original Message -----
From: Erik Wollam
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 12:43 PM
To: bcorrier@cox-internet.com; knipe3@msn.com; chet_fenner@bmc.com; c.r.zander@att.net; Joe.Parks@enron.com; john.chambers@bisys.com; brianc@saltgrass.com; lawfeder@msn.com; c.r.zander@worldnet.att.net
Subject: Man Night

Men:

Hunting season is over. It is now working season. All email threads are
gone. No one talks to one another. This is wrong.

I therefor propose man night February 28th, 2002 at some location yet to be
determined, such as Tony's mexican food...on Ella.

e.

_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com


Please prepare a draft isda for this hedge fund ASAP.  Before actually
distributing this ISDA, please give me word that it is ready in the event
that Bill wants to tweak something.


Tana:

In follow up to my email to Mike Haney, I failed to put a footer on the PW
NDA.  All of my NDA's are located in my directory in the
EnronOnline/Confidentiality Agreements sub-files.  The PWNDAFinal is the
clean revised version of this document.

Leslie


Start Date: 12/30/01; HourAhead hour: 17;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001123017.txt
###Cannot locate a Preferred or Revised_Preferred Schedule that matches the FINAL Individual Interchange Schedule.  Unable to assign deal number.
###Cannot locate a Preferred or Revised_Preferred Schedule that matches the FINAL Individual Interchange Schedule.  Unable to assign deal number.


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 05/15/2001 07:19 PM -----

	Scott Govenar <sgovenar@govadv.com>
	05/15/2001 05:59 PM

		 To: Hedy Govenar <hgovenar@govadv.com>, Mike Day <MDay@GMSSR.com>, Bev
Hansen <bhansen@lhom.com>, Jeff Dasovich <jdasovic@enron.com>, Susan J Mara
<smara@enron.com>, Paul Kaufman <paul.kaufman@enron.com>, Michael McDonald
<Michael.McDonald@enron.com>, Sandra McCubbin <Sandra.McCubbin@enron.com>,
Rick Shapiro <rshapiro@enron.com>, Jim Steffes <james.d.steffes@enron.com>,
Alan Comnes <acomnes@enron.com>, Steven Kean <Steven.J.Kean@enron.com>, Karen
Denne <kdenne@enron.com>, "Harry.Kingerski@enron.com"
<Harry.Kingerski@enron.com>, Mike D Smith <msmith1@enron.com>, Leslie Lawner
<Leslie.Lawner@enron.com>, Robert Frank <rfrank@enron.com>, Ken Smith
<ken@kdscommunications.com>, Janel Guerrero <Janel.Guerrero@enron.com>,
Miyung Buster <Miyung.Buster@enron.com>, Jennifer Thome
<Jennifer.Thome@enron.com>, Eric Letke <eletke@enron.com>, Mary Schoen
<Mary.Schoen@enron.com>, David Leboe <David.Leboe@ENRON.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Ferc/Republicans

Attached, please find the following press releases from Governor Davis:

1) Governor Davis wrote a letter to FERC regarding the QFs.

http://www.governor.ca.gov/state/govsite/gov_htmldisplay.jsp?BV_SessionID=@@@@
0148135597.0989967115@@@@&BV_EngineID=galkllhdjdebemfcfkmchcng.0&sCatTitle=Pre
ss+Release&sFilePath=/govsite/press_release/2001_05/20010515_PR01215_GGD_lette
r_to_FERC.html&sTitle=GOVERNOR+DAVIS+SENDS+LETTER+TO+FERC+5%2f15%2f01&iOID=147
70

2) Governor Davis blames Republicans for Moodys downgrade.

http://www.governor.ca.gov/state/govsite/gov_htmldisplay.jsp?BV_SessionID=@@@@
0148135597.0989967115@@@@&BV_EngineID=galkllhdjdebemfcfkmchcng.0&sCatTitle=Pre
ss+Release&sFilePath=/govsite/press_release/2001_05/20010515_PR01219_Moodys_cr
edit_rating.html&sTitle=GOP+OBSTRUCTION+LEADS+TO+CALIFORNIA+%0aCREDIT+DOWNGRAD
E%0a&iOID=14750


In all week.


Fax the attached word document to Jeff ASAP, thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 05/24/2001
10:05 AM ---------------------------
From: Jeff Dasovich on 05/18/2001 11:50 AM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: sryan@aesc.com, bbailey@duke-energy.com, Lynn.A.Lednicky@Dynegy.com,
john.harrison@elpaso.com, rachel.king@elpaso.com, clark.smith@elpaso.com,
skean@enron.com, tom.allen@mirant.com, sonnet.edmonds@mirant.com,
randy.harrison@mirant.com, alex.goldberg@williams.com
cc:

Subject: Comprehensive Solution

These are the materials that Ken Lay used in his discussions with California
business leaders.  The word document was provided as background.  Please keep
confidential and if I've missed anyone please forward along.  Comments are
welcome and appreciated.

Best,
Jeff


I have already received a pretty substantial stack of master agreements from
Bill Bradford that I am having copied right now.  Bill believes that these
are the contracts under which we have the most significant exposure to PGE
entities, and that if we provide these to LeBouef they will have most of the
story.

Before you go to a lot of trouble tracking documents down, you might want to
see what I have.  I will also need some help in identifying specific
contracts to specific positions on the credit spreadsheet.

Thanks for your help on this.

Travis McCullough
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street EB 3817
Houston Texas 77002
Phone:  (713) 853-1575
Fax: (713) 646-3490


On October 17, 2001 Rockland Electric Company and PJM filed with FERC a joint application for the transfer of operational control from the NYISO to PJM of certain facilities located in Northern New Jersey.  The facilities are the transmission assets in the Eastern Division of Rockland's service territory.  This includes approximately 400 MW of load in Bergen County, NJ and transmission facilities that are already directly interconnected with PJM (note that other Rockland facilities located in NJ, namely those in northern Passaic County and Sussex County (Rockland's Central and Western Divisions respectively) will not be transferred to PJM and will remain under the operational control of the NYISO since these facilities are not directly interconnected with PJM nor with Rockland's Eastern Division).  The filing requests approval of the transfer by November 30, 2001 which would allow PJM to take operational control on February 1, 2002 (the filing does not address what, if any, changes to the operation date might be if FERC does not approve this by Nov 30).  Rockland Electric is a subsidiary of Orange & Rockland Utilities which is a subsidiary of Con Edison.

The transfer adds approximately 400 MW of load and 56,000 customers (mostly residential and commercial) to PJM.  There is no increase in supply, therefore the total load of PJM is increased by 400 MW without any additional resources.  The transmission assets include 138-kV (8.3 miles), 69-kV (35.9 miles) and 35-kV (12.4 miles) transmission lines and 11 substations (the filing includes a detailed description of these assets).

Let me know if you require any additional information.


can you do dinner/or show Sunday afternoon?

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


The location for today's meeting at 4:15 p.m. has changed to 50M03 to discuss management's recommendation to the Board of Directors on Project Southwood.

Kelly M. Johnson
Executive Assistant
Enron Corp.
Tel: 713-853-6485
Fax: 713-853-2534
E-Mail: kelly.johnson@enron.com


Attached is FERC authorization for EPMI and EES to purchase power from
industrials NATIONWIDE (effective March 6, 2001--Does not expire).  The
industrial does not have to obtain its own power marketer license from FERC
(subject to EPMI and EES making certain after the fact quarterlty filings for
the industrials).

Specifics:

Owners of generating facilities located at business locations and used
primarily for back-up for self-generation (who will be "public utilities"
subject to the Federal Power Act only while they sell at wholesale) can sell
power at wholesale from such facilities to EPMI and EES without prior notice
under section 205 of FPA (would usually require 60 day advance notice
filing).
  -- Waives certain parts of the filing requirements for the industrial;
however, the industrial will still be subject to shortened filing
requirements for dispositions of facilities and interlocking positions while
they are selling at wholesale.
 -- EPMI and EES will make the FERC quarterly filings on behalf of the
industrials for any of these purchases.  Our report must show the names of
the industrial; aggregate amount of capacity and/or energy purchased from
each seller; and the aggregate compensation paid to each seller.
Accounting/commercial folks for EPMI and EES-- please make sure these
purchases are flagged in the accounting system, since the report will be
separate from our big quarterly reports.
 -- This does not authorize the retail industrial customer to violate any
rules or tariffs of its host utility.  This does not authorize an industrial
to resell power it purchases (only can sell what it generates); unless
otherwise allowed (or not precluded) by its retail tariff.

West Desk:  This is similar to the authorization that FERC gave last week to
purchases from industrials in WSCC.

____________________________________
On April 27, FERC issued an order granting EPMI and EES the authority to
purchase power from IPPs at market-based rates.  As the attached order
indicates, the effective date of the EPMI and EES rate schedules is March 6,
2001.

 - ER011394.wpd
 - ER011394.doc


Kate
please check. still missing:
PREBON:
Richter:

Enron buys Aquila
236.00
May   np 15
25mws

Enron Sells pget
may np 15
25 mws
237.00

Enron Sells aquila
june   np 15
25 mws
275.00

please ch price on deal 551260.01  to 227.00

Amerex:
still missing:
Richter

Enron sells Mirant
apr   np 15  170.00  off peak

Enron sells aquila
june      peak np 15
275.00

Enron sells mirant
25 mws
3/19-3/31
265.00
np15


I tried to approve this a couple of times, so it should be taken care of.

D


David:

Count on us as signatories (Carl, John, and I), however there is a need to
correct two factual errors.  These corrections do not change the sense of
any of the discussions or our suggested remedies, but are important for our
credibility.

First, the utilities were not required to sell or divest their plants.  The
Commission and the Legislature lacked the authority to do so, however, the
divestitures were encouraged in the strongest possible terms.  Therefore,
at page 2 , third line in the last paragraph, we need to change the word
"required" to "strongly encouraged."   Likewise, on page 4, the third
sentence of the second paragraph under the section heading needs to be
slightly modified to read as follows:  "First, California required
utilities to purchase nearly all their electricity on a volatile spot basis
after they divested a substantial portion of their generation...."
Finally, on page 5, the third sentence should be modified as follows:
"These divestitures, encouraged and sanctioned by the CPUC, ...."

Second, also on page 5, the second sentence inaccurately conveys that
utilities had the authority and option to pursue "backstop" fixed price
contracts from their divested plants.  In fact, they were precluded from
doing so under the rules.  Furthermore, the utilities have only divested
their fossil plants, while retaining both hydro and nuclear facilities.
These facilities represent substantial generation assets, especially for
SCE and PG&E.  Accordingly, we suggest the following minor modifications:
"Unfortunately, the utilities have already divested   (strikethrough: most
of their) generation plants without being allowed to secure contracts that
would...."

We also note that the document has not referenced the substantial new
generation capacity that has been approved and scheduled for completion
within the next two years.  If completed (and assuming interim solutions
don't undermine the investment incentives in the meantime), these additions
would add over 6,000 MW of critically needed generation capacity.   The
document should include some reference to this point.  Accordingly, we
suggest the following modification on page 6, the last sentence in full
paragraph 4:  "Only then should we seek contracts to help stabilize prices
for the two-or three-year transition until more permanent solutions can be
put in place, especially as new power plants already approved  (totalling
some 6,000 MW ) come on line within the next two years.

Lastly, we noted a few typos.  On page 5, first line of the second
paragraph under the heading has a dash after "short" which appears
unintended.   On page 7, sixth sentence of the second paragraph,
"Californians' " shouldn't have an apostrophe.  Finally, in the paragraph
that follows on page 7, we use the term "UDC" for the first time without
explanation.  We suggest saying "utilities" instead.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks for the great work!

Mitch


---------------------- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 04/28/2000
02:03 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Kay Young                           04/28/2000 01:54 PM

To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Nonsolicitation provision

Carol:  Per your voice mail I am attaching a portion of a memo that has not
been circulated yet, but it summarizes the requirements, approvals and
notifications required by Corp and ENA Legal policy regarding Standstills,
Nohires and Noncompetes in confidentiality agreements.  This is the portion
relating to Nohires.
 The memo I've been working on is a summary of Jim Derrick's 10/27/99 memo
regarding required approvals plus other ENA policies and language re these
provisions.    THis language is the same as the memo from Lance that you
mentioned.
 Regarding approvals, since business persons (Detmering, Metts) must make
them there is much feeling among attorneys I work most with that business
persons should secure these approvals.

Let me know if you have comments, questions or need anything else.
K


Start Date: 3/4/01; HourAhead hour: 18;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001030418.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 3/4/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_SCOUT
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 3/4/01
  TIE_POINT: SYLMAR_2_NOB
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_SCOUT
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL


Drexel Agner
100 San Juan Drive
Port Townsend, WA 98368
drex@cablespeed.com

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

Drexel Agner


Thomas, if you have any questions, please call me at ext. 54858.

Thanks,

"Z"


If you haven't already done so, please turn in your MS150 pledges TODAY to
either Stephanie Strong (EB2365c)
Becky Pham (EB2336b)
or Amelia Alder (3Ac3120).

Thanks.


Good Morning Sara and Kaye,

The following information is what we received from Samantha's family/pastor
last night.

There will not be a wake for Taylor, however, there will be a viewing
tomorrow, Thursday, March 22, 2001 at 10:00 a.m. and funeral services will be
held at 11:00 a.m. at Greater Pure Light, MBC.  Directions (from downtown)
are as follows:

Take 59N to Laura Koppe.  Take the Laura Koppe exit and make a right on Laura
Koppe.  Take Laura Koppe to Homestead.  Make a left on Homestead and a quick
right on Kelburn.  The address is 8802 Kelburn.

Samantha's Pastor (Pastor Broussard) informed us last night that due to the
fact that the adoption had not been finalized, Taylor was not covered by any
form of insurance.

FYI:  Just in case you don't know, Samantha's husbands's name is Twalure Boyd.

Erica S. Braden
Sr. Administrative Assistant
Enron Broadband Services - Legal
(713) 853-6666
erica_braden@enron.net


Are you still out there?  Sent you an email last week but didn't hear from
you.  Just checking to see if you are still in Seattle or if you moved down
to Cabo for good.


> Attached please find copies of the following schedules and annexes to the
> Purchase and Sale Agreement:
>
> 1) the  Master Parent Disclosure Letter;
>
> 2) the schedules for India;
>
> 3) the schedules for EGEP;
>
> 4) the schedules for APACHI; and
>
> 5) Annex G, listing the contracts that have been excluded for
> confidentiality reasons.
>
> Please note that the schedules for the SoCal assets will follow shortly
> under a separate cover.  In addition, we plan to circulate copies of the
> CALME and Wind schedules tomorrow.
>
> If you have any questions or any problems opening any of the attachments,
> please do not hesitate to contact either Gray Sasser at (713)758-3425 or
> Donnie Roark at (713)758-3374.
>
>
>
>
>
>  <<Master-Disclosure-Ltr.DOC>>  <<India-Schedules.DOC>>
> <<EGEP-Schedules.DOC>>   <<APACHI-Schedules.wpd>>  <<Annex G --
> Excluded-Contracts-Confidentiality.DOC>>
>
>
> +++++++++++++++++++++++
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> +++++++++++++++++++++++
> The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged. This
> email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization
> named above. If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized
> representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
> review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if
> any, or the information contained herein is prohibited. If you have
> received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by
> return email and delete this email from your system. Thank You
>
>

 - WORD v1 Summer Disclosure Letter.DOC
 - 00 India Schedules.DOC
 - 285641_1.DOC
 - Lightning-Schedules3.wpd
 - Annex G -- Excluded Information Based on Confidentiality Requirements.DOC


Start Date: 4/29/01; HourAhead hour: 10;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Generation schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042910.txt

---- Generation Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE.
     Details: (Hour: 10 / Preferred:  10.00 / Final:   9.92)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ARCO
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/29/01
  UNIT_ID: CARBGN_6_UNIT 1


I forgot Bank of America:  Hugh L. McColl, Jr., Chairman and CEO


Its my turn, sorry I havent jumped in til now, computer problems.

At a EPSA sponsored meeting on Aug 9, the GISB Chair and Rae McQuade sat down and we went through what it takes to get EISB rolling and how they would tackle the tough issues at NERC.

I beleive the EPSA folks in the room, Mirant, Dynegy, Ontario Power Gen, Enron, Exelon, Calpine  and ELCON all felt that there shouls be one organization setting standards because of the inherent risks of assuming reliability and commercial issues can be sleanly separated.  We came away from the meeting with a comfort level that the GISB process will provide the right mechanism to resolve this age old debate - I don't care what kind of standard you call it - if you write it - it must be put through the GISB/EISB wringer.  GISB recommended that perhaps what we know as NERC today could be given a segment in the energy quadrant.

Also to respond to Sarah's note about support for an SRO - no entity in the room supported that FERC give deference to ANY standards organization - not NERC, NAERO, GISB or RTOs.  So I think we need to hold tight to this issue and we will be able to rally support for it.

I will speak at the GISB conference next Wed, Aug 15 at DOE.  I am working with Mark Bennett and other EPSA folks on key principles of what EPSA wants from the EISB Strawman.

I have attached notes I put together that will evolve into the statements I will make on behalf of EPSA.

Please proviede me your thoughts.

Also - I agree with Dick, today, NERC is 12.5 million dollars annually, and mostly utility dollars.  If we are going to push for a EISB, we have to provide some carrot for these utilities to agree to let EISB do this.  NERC (and their supporters) will fall on their sword on funding and the reult will be we have 2 organizations setting standards if NERC cannot agree to become a part of the EISB process.

And one more thing, I don't know how much commitment Jeff Skilling feels he has to the Independent Baord members, many of which he helped get seated.  But pushing for EISB and perhaps wrapping NERC into it as the reliability piece (GISB's suggestion) - may render the Independents obsolete.  I don't know if are wedded to them.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ingersoll, Richard
Sent:	Wednesday, August 08, 2001 8:47 PM
To:	Shapiro, Richard
Cc:	Rodriquez, Andy; Yeung, Charles; Nicolay, Christi L.; Perrino, Dave; Steffes, James D.; Shelk, John; Novosel, Sarah; Walton, Steve; Scott, Susan
Subject:	RE: FTC / NERC - Comment of the Staff of the Bureau of Economics and of Policy Planning of the Federal Trade Commission.

When all is said and done money rules and this means that the source of the funds to run the RTO's must come from an independent source if we are to have independent RTO's.  Perhaps directly from the rate payers or as a last resort federal funding.  If the feds fund they will rule the electric business like they do the schools and highways by using  threats to with hold dollars as a method of geting their proposals accepted.  Kind of dammed if we do and dammed if we don't.   If we don't sole the funding we will not resolve the other issues to our satisfaction.

	Richard Shapiro/ENRON@enronXgate 08/07/2001 06:53 PM 	   To: Steve Walton/ENRON@enronXgate, Dave Perrino/ENRON@enronXgate, Charles Yeung/ENRON@enronXgate, James D Steffes/ENRON@enronXgate  cc: John Shelk/NA/Enron@Enron, Andy Rodriquez/ENRON@enronXgate, Richard Ingersoll/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Christi L Nicolay/ENRON@enronXgate, Susan Scott/ENRON@enronXgate  Subject: RE: FTC / NERC - Comment of the Staff of the Bureau of Economics and of Policy Planning of the Federal Trade Commission.

I agree with Steve although I've articulated a different point of view at times in the recent past. The CAISO experience is the most compelling argument of all. Let's make sure this is our position...but, if there are still dissenting points of view, we should hear them out....But,We do need to resolve this quickly. A final thought: this perspective puts us in between the NERC and PJM views..perhaps in an advantageous position to broker a legislative compromise.

-----Original Message-----
From:	Walton, Steve
Sent:	Tue 8/7/2001 7:40 PM
To:	Perrino, Dave; Yeung, Charles; Shapiro, Richard; Steffes, James D.
Cc:	Shelk, John; Rodriquez, Andy; Ingersoll, Richard; Novosel, Sarah; Nicolay, Christi L.; Scott, Susan
Subject:	RE: FTC / NERC - Comment of the Staff of the Bureau of Economics and of Policy Planning of the Federal Trade Commission.

After reading the FTC document, I am concerned that we are loosing sight of the fact that the RTO is first and foremost a provider of transmission service.  It will decide who uses the system, how it will be used, what schedules will be accepted, etc.  Do we really want it to set the standards by its performance is to be judged by others?  There are two tendencies to guard against.  (1)  Most of these organizations are going to be not-for-profit ISOs in form.  There may be a tendency to use very stringent rules to minimize outage risk and criticism of the RTO's management.  This could require the construction of facilities when they are not completly necessary.  (2) The opposite possiblity exists, namely, that they will adjust rules to cover their own mistakes.  I think the former problem is the most likely.

If the RTOs take over the NERC role as suggested, then the reliability rules would have to become part of the FERC tariff.  In order to judge the validity of the "reliability provisions" of the tariffs the FERC will be required to develop expertise it does not have.  In practice NERC doesn't have the expertise either.  It really resides in the members of the committees and is thus derived from the industry.  By having a separate Standards Setting Organization, the rules can still be established using the expertise of the industry.  The SSO would propose rules which FERC would accept subject to complaint.  The SSO's governance has to be fair, but I am not personally concerned about it being indepenent as long as FERC has oversight. It is the service provider (the RTO) that needs to be independent.  The standards in most industries are set in this way.  The power of the state to enforce the rules come from commissions of various types.  For instance, the National Electric Code is developed by the industry, but its enforcement is accomplished by adopting it into building codes, state liscensing requirements, etc.  In the same way, the SSO can develop the reliability rules which are incorporated in FERC's requirement imposed on the RTO.  The RTO's tariff would incorporate them by reference.  If the RTOs performance violates the rules or if a generator doesn't hold up its requirements, then ADR/FERC action can be taken to enforce.

My reason for this long message is to draw attention to the fact that the major function of the RTO is provision of transmission service.  It should not see itself as a regulator.  The case of the CAISO is instructive, since they think they are above compliance with rules since the believe they are the guardians of the public interest.  When the service provider thinks it regulates to comes to believe it has a right to decide who "should" have transmission service rather than get on with providing it.

Steve

	 -----Original Message-----
	From: 	Perrino, Dave
	Sent:	Tuesday, August 07, 2001 6:16 PM
	To:	Yeung, Charles; Shapiro, Richard; Steffes, James D.
	Cc:	Shelk, John; Rodriquez, Andy; Ingersoll, Richard; Novosel, Sarah; Nicolay, Christi L.; Scott, Susan; Walton, Steve
	Subject:	FTC / NERC - Comment of the Staff of the Bureau of Economics and of Policy Planning of the Federal Trade Commission.

Charles,

	Attached to this message is the results of a study completed by the FTC at DOE's request relating to NERC and open access, dated Jan 4, 2001.  I believe this document is significant and should be considered in our ongoing quest for a truly independent "standards" organization.  I would point you to page 10, the last sentence which states, "To the extent that RTOs are implemented in all areas of the country and have large geographic scope (or that FERC causes RTOs to coordinate their policies and rates that affect reliability within each of the three transmission Interconnects), the need for a separate reliability organization with mandatory rules may be greatly  educed or eliminated.",  Interesting.....

	Kind Regards,

	Dave

	 << File: FTC document.pdf >>

		 -----Original Message-----
		From: 	Yeung, Charles
		Sent:	Tuesday, August 07, 2001 2:57 PM
		To:	Shapiro, Richard; Steffes, James D.
		Cc:	Shelk, John; Rodriquez, Andy; Ingersoll, Richard; Perrino, Dave; Novosel, Sarah; Nicolay, Christi L.; Scott, Susan; Walton, Steve
		Subject:	Update - NERC Version of Legislation

		Rick

		The following discussion is to bring you up to date on the latest NERC activities on reliability legislation that was a subject on the weekly ENRON-NERC team conference call.

		John Shelk explained that NERC has significantly reduced the length of its proposed "Title on Reliability" so as to look more like the PJM approach.  Fundamentally, there are still major differences.  NERC continues to push for the embodiment of deference by FERC to the "SRO" in the legislation.

		Given the conference call last week with John Q Anderson, Dave Cook and Jeff Skilling, we were concerned how the upcoming meeting on Aug 9 by NERC stakeholders to "finalize" the NERC version would impact Jeff's request to speak with the Independent Board members before accepting any form of deference to NERC to become the SRO (or the term we prefer Standards Setting Organization - SSO).

		The meeting on the 9th should not interfere with Jeff's ability to present issues to the Board.  We don't think Jeff needs to contact John Q Anderson or any NERC members about the Aug 9 meeting.  However, for the discussions with NERC, John Shelk plans to "stay the line" on the Enron position of keeping authority to defer to any SSO with FERC and to keep any language that defers to the SSO out of the legislation.

		Jeff should still be able to argue for key Board action items, and if Enron is appeased, deference to NERC could still be given - but not through legislation, rather through FERC "comfort" that the SSO is doing a good job.  By knowing that FERC can "pull the plug" on the SSO if it is not satisfied, this will provide the correct incentive for the SSO to ensure that no industry segment dominates the standards setting process.

		I am completing a draft of issues that we want the Independents to resolve/address for Jeff Skilling to take to the Board.
		Additionally, Andy Rodriquez and I will develop a summary of examples of why NERC, in its current form, is not able to develop consensus rules that all its members are willing to comply with.  These examples should be powerful arguments for John Shelk to leverage in arguments for FERC authority in the legislation.

		We also discussed the need to shop our reliability legislation principles with Pat Wood and perhaps DOE.

		Charles Yeung
		713-853-0348


I am sorry,  who drafted the amendment?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Osire, Ann
Sent:	Monday, August 20, 2001 4:50 PM
To:	Perlingiere, Debra
Subject:	RE: Amendment to Master Firm Purchase/Sale Agreement (Barrett Resources Corporation)

The agreement (#96000255) was papered by Enron

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Perlingiere, Debra
Sent:	Monday, August 20, 2001 4:36 PM
To:	Osire, Ann
Subject:	RE: Amendment to Master Firm Purchase/Sale Agreement (Barrett Resources Corporation)

 Who drafted this agreement?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Osire, Ann
Sent:	Monday, August 20, 2001 3:17 PM
To:	'wayne.ellis@williams.com'
Cc:	Dickson, Stacy E.; Perlingiere, Debra; Osire, Ann
Subject:	Amendment to Master Firm Purchase/Sale Agreement (Barrett Resources Corporation)

Mr. Ellis,

Per our telephone conversation this afternoon, attached please find the above-referenced amendment that was originally forwarded to Bob Howard.   The amendment restates Section 5.1 Confirmation Letter Procedure

If in agreement, please print and execute two originals and forward same to the attention of Debra Perlingiere at the following address:

Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department, EB 3885
1400 Smith Street
Houston, Texas 77002

Would you also kindly fax a copy of same to my attention at fax# (713) 646-2495.

Debra will forward an original for your records upon final execution by Enron North America Corp.  Please do not hesitate to call me should you have any questions regarding the attached.

Thanks,

Ann Osire
(713) 345-3136

	 << File: Amendment to Barrett.doc >>


I'd love to see his last article, but don't see any advantage in giving him
any real information on our struggles right now.  Maybe after the dust
settles in a few weeks I'll be less nervous.  DF

	From:  Michel Nelson                           01/04/2001 01:50 PM

To: Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Phil
Lowry/OTS/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Gas Processors Report

I received a call from Doug Gill, a reported for the Gas Processors Report, a
small publication that is similar to Gas Daily.
(1 800 874 2544 ext 121)

He stated he had written a report on shutting down processing plants being
shut down, and the impact to Processors. (He is faxing me that particular
publication)

He was interested in doing an article on the impact that gas processing
shutdowns has had to pipeline operations.

Per Doug: 'nobody is quoted'. With all the issues we have going on, I didn't
know if we wanted to take advantage of this opportunity or fully decline this
opportunity.

Comments......


Tana,

Attached are the credit worksheets for Royal Bank of Canada and Bow River
Trust.  As we discussed we have proposed letters of credit for the approved
form of collateral pending further discussion with Treasury regarding funding
impact.  We may have to move to cash margining if necessary.

Please call if you have any questions.

Bill


Start Date: 1/13/02; HourAhead hour: 9;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002011309.txt


Sara- attached is the new draft of the cargill POA FINALLY.. I am reading
over now - hopefully they have changed what I requested.. Please let me know
if Frank or Brent should attend to this..

Regards,
Caroline
---------------------- Forwarded by Caroline Abramo/Corp/Enron on 04/03/2001
12:08 PM ---------------------------

Kristin_Wessels@cargill.com on 04/03/2001 10:20:21 AM
To: caroline.abramo@enron.com
cc:

Subject: attached POA

Please call me if you have questions regarding
the document.

thanks,

Kristin
952-984-3394

 - POAGLOBAL-ENRON.doc


Here is the latest model.  Let talk about it ASAP.
Ben


Dave Parquet and I spoke with Smutney of IEP re: herding the cats.

In true "swedish hostage syndrome" fashion, Smutney informed us that none of
IEP's members has screamed about the FERC-proposed cap.  He added that the
"industry" is under siege and that "just saying no" to price caps isn't
politically tenable.  He also said that he hadn't planned on mentioning price
caps in his remarks.  We expressed concern that it would be hard for the head
of California's generator association to avoid the topic.

We stressed the importance of having IEP disagree with FERC's cap proposal
and offered the following message points:

Price caps have failed in the past and they'll fail again.
FERC's and California's immediate goal ought to be to make the bold reforms
necessary to create real, competitive markets and eliminate the need for
price caps altogether.
The most important reforms include:
Reforming California's siting laws to permit entry of supply---best way to
undermine "high" prices is easy entry by competitors
Reforming the PUC review of utility purchases
Give the utilities financial incentives to purchase efficiently (i.e.,
similar to California's gas market, where a benchmark is set and the IOUs
profit or lose on the basis of whether the IOU does better or worse than the
benchmark).  It ain't rocket science, and it works.
The CPUC gets out of the way and stops the practice of "after-the-fact"
reviews of power purchases.
Creating a retail market
If California/FERC adopt these reforms, the need for caps will vanish.
FERC got a lot right in the order, but the price cap proposal is flawed.
Price is too low to incent development of peakers---well-functioning,
efficient markets require peakers.
Information disclosure provisions are too costly and unnecessary.
Disincents energy efficiency.
IEP written comments will offer suggestions on how to remedy the flaws in the
proposed cap.

Smutney was comfortable with these points and is open to hearing more from us
today and tomorrow.  If folks have comments on these points, or have others
we should discuss with Smutney, don't hesitate.

Best,
Jeff


Do you need new leads for your business ?
 Do you need increased Internet Exposure ?

 Thousands join the Internet daily.... ever since 1995
 Have you reached the thousands of new internet users?

 Search Engines: work IF you're in the TOP 20 among thousands
 Classifieds:    work IF your ad is near the top among thousands

 Banner Ads:     work IF you use top engines for a lot of money

 ALL 3 require prospects TO FIND YOU FIRST among thousands.

 Did you know that there is a method of marketing that costs
 pennies but have the same effect as direct postal mail?

 AND THEY DONT HAVE TO FIND YOU ... bring it straigt on ...

 You can now compete with the big boys, with exposure in
 mass numbers, without expensive investments such as those
 associated with TV, radio, direct postal mail, or telemarketing.

 THE SOLUTION  ...  E-mail Marketing

 E-mail Marketing is a proven method to reach a global market
 with a small investment. It is more advantageous than conventional
 marketing. The prospects are millions and can be reached for much
 less than conventional methods.

    Send your ad to millions

        nationwide, by state, country  or  worldwide.

 ACT NOW   and   reach your untapped internet market !

 Call :     6 2 6   8 2 1   3 1 5 0

 Mention your   1) name     2) tel     3) service needed

       ACT NOW   and   reach your untapped internet market !


Please find attached the current copy of the EnronOnline Weekly Public Report
and Key Messages, including slides and statistics for public consumption.
The information contained in the attachments can be communicated to audiences
outside the company and should be used to ensure that we present a consistent
message to the public. Please ensure that this email is distributed to anyone
in your group who needs to discuss EnronOnline with individuals outside the
company.

This report is not intended to be used as a stand-alone presentation, nor
that all the information be used in a single presentation or customer
communication.

Total Life to Date Transactions > 890,000
Average Daily Transactions > 4,500

Life to Date Notional Value of Transactions > $520 billion
Daily Notional Value Approximately $2.5 billion

Number of Products Offered: Approximately 1,400
Number of Currencies Traded in = 13

EnronOnline Version 1.0 Launch Date: November 29, 1999
EnronOnline Version 2.0 Launch Date: September 18, 2000


The last two LTNW deals - 349864 and 318870 are changed to correct time
zones. They gave me the option to choose "no" for rerouting of schedules.
They were both EOL deals.

Kate

Cara Semperger
03/23/2001 01:39 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: A whole bunch of deal errors that I want your opinion on .

I just ran a forward ob for April 2 to check for deals that are in PST when
they should be PDT.

Do you want to change all of these to PPT deals, or do you have time
constraints today?  I need these changed today because we are already setting
up for April.

SW Regions
347721
353734
353813
407053
352524
361210
352809
346646
346647
352628
360473
360475
360477
360483
361244
366541
366543
346822
348162

NW Regions
318870
349864

I am particularly worried about how these are corrected because they are long
term transmission deals that cannot be autoscheduled.
503107
503112


Debra and Dan -

I PROMISE THIS IS THE LAST ONE I'M GOING TO SEND FOR A WHILE.

Please send a draft to:

Mr. Mike Wardell
City of Roseville
2090 Hilltop Circle
Roseville, CA 95747

Please email a copy to Kim Ward and to me.

Thanks,

Jay


Art,

Per Mark Whitt's request, attached is our form dedicated reserves purchase
agreement.


Guys, notes from the morning meeting.  Please review and comment.

Specific action items:
 a) i)further calculation of ENA/Non- ENA capacity charges, ii) estimation of
outside legal and iii) formulation of charge out/feedback process to the
business units;
 b) need budget/review for competitive analysis, technical and restructuring.

Regards
Delainey


Let's discuss this.
----- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 06/07/2001 11:50 AM -----

	exchangeinfo@nymex.com
	06/07/2001 12:20 PM

		 To: mark.taylor@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: (01-191) EXCHANGE TO SUBSTITUTE POSITION ACCOUNTABILITY
REQUIREMENTS FOR POSITION LIMIT RULES

June 7, 2001
Notice No. 01-191

TO:
ALL NYMEX DIVISION MEMBERS
ALL NYMEX DIVISION CLEARING MEMBERS / MEMBER FIRMS

FROM:
NEAL WOLKOFF, EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT

RE:
EXCHANGE TO SUBSTITUTE POSITION ACCOUNTABILITY REQUIREMENTS FOR POSITION
LIMIT RULES

The board of directors of the New York Mercantile Exchange, Inc., has
approved substituting position accountability requirements for the current
position limits on all but the last three trading days of its crude oil,
heating oil, unleaded gasoline, and natural gas contracts, beginning with the
Friday, June 15, trading session.

For the last three days of trading in a particular delivery month, each of
those contracts would continue to have a position limit of 1,000 lots.

The current net position limits levels will be reflected in the
accountability levels. These are:

   Any one month         All months
Crude oil  10,000   20,000
Unleaded gasoline 5,000   7,000
Heating oil  5,000   7,000
Natural gas  7,000   12,000

Any market participant with positions exceeding these levels may be contacted
by the Exchange with inquiries regarding the participant's hedging
requirements or financial condition. The Exchange would reserve the right to
require that the position be reduced or capped.

There will no longer be any gross limits on the number of positions that can
be held, as long as they are offset by positions on the opposite side of the
market (example: a participant with 10,000 long positions in September,
October, and November crude oil futures and 10,000 short positions for
December and January would be considered to have a net position of 10,000
contracts).

These new rules are also intended to apply to the Brent crude oil futures
contract, planned for launch this summer. The board has also approved a
minimum reporting level of 100 lots for that contract.

These rules, which closely resemble those in place for metals traded on the
COMEX Division, must be approved by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission
prior to implementation.

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"
http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=mark.taylor@enron.com&refdo
c=(01-191)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


Pam,

Another term paper:

John Ganguzza
Neeraj Hingorani
Grant Johnson
Duane Maue
Rishad Patel
Eric van Stone
Palo Yoshiuro

Grade:  A

Please, confirm.

Vince


I notified Jim Fell and Terrell Gault of the delay in getting the documents
to them, and Jim actually said he had both the Business Plan and the EIS and
therefore didn't need either. Hopefully the Business Plan will arrive from
BPA today and I'll send it off to Terrell.

Also, I'm sorry about the errors on the place cards. I was in a hurry to get
them out to Sir Not-So-Speedy and overlooked those details. I hope it didn't
cause too much confusion.

Kate


>
> It was reported today that at a White House staff
> meeting last week there was a heated discussion about the health of Vice
>
> President Cheney and his angina problem. President Bush interrupted and
> stated
> emphatically that "Men do not have angina's." The president was
> especially perplexed when a staffer said that Cheney has "acute angina."
>
>
>
> Nancy
> (707) 251-4870 (phone)
> (707) 265-5446 (fax)
> "Plus je bois, mieux je chante"
>
>
>


---------------------- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 10/12/99 09:04 AM
---------------------------

Michael R Brown
10/12/99 02:46 AM
To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Legal Conference

Not Jon .
Just me , Justin and Paul .
Incidentally , I have told about four different people this .
Michael


Dan,
Received this contract but looks like you put in I + .05 instead of I + .005
Can you please correct and send to me?
Thanks

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Gary W Lamphier                           10/27/2000 01:11 PM

To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary W Lamphier/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Marathon

Dan,
Please prepare the necessary documents.  The accepted proposal is below
Option A.
Thanks,
Gary


---------------------- Forwarded by Robin Rodrigue/HOU/ECT on 02/13/2001
08:48 AM ---------------------------

Robin Rodrigue
02/13/2001 06:03 AM
To: Kori Loibl/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: CCT

EFF_DT PORTFOLIO_ID DOWN95
2/12/01  MANAGEMENT-COAL 0
2/12/01  MANAGEMENT-CRD 0
2/12/01  MANAGEMENT-GAS 1,016,311.
2/12/01  MANAGEMENT-PWR 169,668
2/12/01  AGG-MANAGEMENT 1,089,337


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Dorland/CAL/ECT on 02/08/2000 02:05
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Office of the Chairman @ ENRON                           02/08/2000
05:16 AM

To: All_Enron_North America, EC Employees -- All@Enron Communications, Mass
mailing list -- EECC all@enron_development, EI Announcements -- All Notes
Users (Part 01)@enron_development, EI Announcements -- All Notes Users (Part
02)@enron_development, EI Announcements -- All Notes Users (Part
03)@enron_development, EI Announcements -- All Notes Users (Part
04)@enron_development, EI Announcements -- All Notes Users (Part
05)@enron_development, EI Announcements -- All Notes Users (Part
06)@enron_development, EI Announcements -- All Notes Users (Part
07)@enron_development, EI Announcements -- All Notes Users (Part
08)@enron_development, EI Announcements -- All Notes Users (Part
09)@enron_development, EES_Employees@EES, ECT- Notes Domain-All@ECT, Enron
Corporate News/Enron@Gateway
cc:
Subject: Fortune Most Admired Ranking

Congratulations!  For an unprecedented five years in a row, Enron has been
ranked the "Most Innovative Company in America" by Fortune magazine.  In
addition, for the first time, Enron has also been ranked #1 in "Quality of
Management," topping General Electric and Omnicom Group, and our "Employee
Talent" has been ranked #2, behind Goldman Sachs and ahead of Cisco
Systems.   America's most admired management team is paired with the best and
brightest employee talent.  That winning combination has led to Enron's
five-year "Most Innovative" sweep.  The "Most Admired" list will appear in
Fortune's Feb. 21 issue, available on newsstands Feb. 8.

You are the reason we have achieved such consistent recognition.  You bring
the innovative ideas to Enron and create new business opportunities.  You
contribute to our quality management team.  And you are the outstanding
employee talent that makes Enron such an exciting and successful company.

Keep up your outstanding work, and we look forward to even greater
achievements in 2000!


Regional Office Summary

Summary of current regional office activities - please review and inform Lisa
Fair of any changes or developments.


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 10/30/2000
01:19 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  B Scott Palmer                           10/30/2000 12:46 PM

To: Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Have you done the George W Dance

I thought you would like this.
---------------------- Forwarded by B Scott Palmer/HOU/ECT on 10/30/2000
12:44 PM ---------------------------

Sarah Palmer
10/27/2000 02:35 PM
To: pipandsip@aol.com, b scott palmer@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Have you done the George W Dance

----- Forwarded by Sarah Palmer/HOU/ECT on 10/27/2000 02:34 PM -----

	Ruth A Lancaster@ENRON
	10/27/2000 09:38 AM

		 To: BCC
		 cc: (bcc: Sarah Palmer/HOU/ECT)
		 Subject: Have you done the George W Dance

This is no way relects my political views?!?!?!?

> http://www.cwdzyns.com/dubya/ <http://www.cwdzyns.com/dubya/>


CRAIG!
What the hell have you been up to?  I just got your email address from Carl.
  I havent talked to him in about 2 years either.  Last year I tried
everything to get your address so you could come to my wedding.  I got
married last July.  My wife, Jennifer, is just finishing up at the U, so she
is a little younger than us, but she's really cute, intelligent, blah,
blah....  Anyway, are you still in Portland?  I heard you were working at
Enron, but apparantly they do not know that since I tried calling several
times and they had no idea who the fuck I was talking about.  Man, Enron has
had a tough time.  Amazing considering the talent that works at that
company...not being sarcastic.  You should do the prudent thing and become a
teacher/baseball coach like me...no stress, summers off, and job security.
Plus, the pay is not as bad as it's made out to be...considering you get a
pension when you retire.  I love it.  Anyway, I don't feel like typing
anymore, so either give me a call, or I can give you a call if you send your
number.  I'd love to catch up.  My cell:  206-293-1459.  Call after 2:30
(yes, that is the end of my work day)  Hope to hear from you soon.

Ollie

_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com


This should be the last issue.

-----Original Message-----
From: Leite, Francisco Pinto
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 8:31 AM
To: Panus, Stephanie
Subject: Re: FW: Enron/Encore ISDA Documentation

I guess we are almost there right?

Tx
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


Thanks!
----- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 12/20/2000 11:44 AM -----

	Stephanie Panus@ENRON
	12/19/2000 04:09 PM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Wendi LeBrocq/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Statoil assignment to J. Aron

I have spoken with Susan Ruggles at Goldman Sachs (guarantor for J. Aron) a
couple of times and she informed me that the Assignment Agreement is being
reviewed by legal.  The attorney is Steve Bunkin, whom I have also left a
message.  The assignment has been executed by Statoil and Enron, and was sent
to Goldman Sachs on October 2.  I will continue to contact them, or, if you
would like to call, Steve's number is 212-902-0952, email is
steven.bunkin@gs.com.

Stephanie


....where geniuses speak...

	Colleen Silva <Csilva@redsky.com>
	07/10/2001 03:03 PM

		 To: "'Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com'" <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: hey whassup?

yay, kisses and no i didn't know about eggers, where is he speaking?

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 12:53 PM
To: Colleen Silva
Subject: RE: hey whassup?

fear not o boisterous one.  you know that eggers is speaking in SF in the
fall, right?

                    Colleen Silva

                    <Csilva@redsk        To:     "'Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com'"

                    y.com>               <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>

                                         cc:

                    07/10/2001           Subject:     RE: hey whassup?

                    02:50 PM

darling boy-

i'm never mad at you, never ever, and i really do adore you to death and
forever and can't bear the idea that we wouldn't be friends till death do
us
part, and that i wouldn't be welcome in your life, so no, i was never mad
and don't even remember which of my (many) soliloquoys you may have
interrupted or are referring to but i do know that i have a rather
boisterous personality and perhaps i stepped on your toes and this is not
my
intention and i adore you and my company is about to go under so the idea
of
being unemployed AND having you upset with me is far too much for my
delicate self to handle...

xo
colleen

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 12:48 PM
To: Colleen Silva
Subject: Re: hey whassup?

i was never mad at you.  i thought that you were mad at me for interrupting
your soliloquy.

                    Colleen Silva

                    <Csilva@redsk        To:     "'jdasovic@enron.com'"

                    y.com>               <jdasovic@enron.com>

                                         cc:

                    07/10/2001           Subject:     hey whassup?

                    02:26 PM

you still mad at moi?

don't be....
-------------------------------------------------------------++

      colleen silva
      producer
      RED SKY       >san francisco
      v 415-633-2023
      c 415-336-2219
      <http://www.redsky.com>


Thank you for advising me of this issue.  When you get back-up , please
forward to Patti Sullivan.  We are going to work on charging them some
penalties for a differnet month to help offset this.


I've logged on. Thanks for your help.

-----Original Message-----
From: Danny.Lee@enron.com [mailto:Danny.Lee@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2000 5:07 PM
To: ekrapels@esaibos.com
Subject: EOL Guest Account Access

Attention:          ESAI
               Ed Krapels

Thank you for your interest in EnronOnline.

The  following  is a guest password that will allow you temporary view only
access  to  EnronOnline.   Please  note,  the user ID and password are CASE
SENSITIVE.

     Guest User ID:      ENA61296
     Guest Password:     WELCOME!

In  order  to  apply  for transaction status with EnronOnline, your company
needs to complete a Password Application and Registration Form for a Master
User  account.   Each  Master  User will be able to grant various levels of
access for additional users.

To obtain a Password Application and Registration Form, you can visit our
website at www.enrononline.com and select the "How to Register" link, or
call our HelpDesk at 713/853-HELP (4357).   Alternatively, you may click on
the attached documents, complete the forms, and fax to 713-646-8511.

Just a reminder, in order to access EnronOnline, Shockwave needs to be
installed.  The Shockwave installer can be found within "About EnronOnline"
on the home page.  After opening "About EnronOnline", using right scroll
bar, go to the bottom.  Click on "download Shockwave" and follow the
directions.  After loading Shockwave, shut down and reopen browser (i.e.
Microsoft Internet Explorer/Netscape).

We  hope you will find that EnronOnline provides an easy and more efficient
way  to  do  business  with  Enron. We look forward to transacting with you
online.

Sincerely,

Danny Lee
EnronOnline HelpDesk
713/853-HELP (4357)

(See attached file: NA PA Ver 2 Web.doc)(See attached file:
Registration_Form.doc)


A que hora?  (what time?)


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 04/27/2001 04:06 PM -----

	"Julee Malinowski-Ball" <jmball@ns.net>
	04/27/2001 03:42 PM
	Please respond to "Julee Malinowski-Ball"

		 To: "Jan Smutny Jones" <smutny@iepa.com>, "Steven Kelley" <steven@iepa.com>,
"Katie Kaplan" <kaplan@iepa.com>
		 cc: "William Hall" <wfhall2@duke-energy.com>, "Tony Wetzel"
<twetzel@thermoecotek.com>, "Tandy McMannes" <mcmannes@aol.com>, "Sue Mara"
<smara@enron.com>, "Steve Ponder" <steve_ponder@fpl.com>, "Steve Iliff"
<siliff@riobravo-gm.com>, "Stephanie Newell"
<stephanie-newell@reliantenergy.com>, "Scott Sadler"
<sadlersa@earthlink.net>, "Roger Pelote" <roger.pelote@williams.com>,
"Richard Hyde" <rwhyde@duke-energy.com>, "Randy Hickok"
<rjhickok@duke-energy.com>, "Rachel King" <rachel.king@elpaso.com>, "Paula
Soos" <paula_soos@ogden-energy.com>, "Nam Nguyen" <nam.nguyen@powersrc.com>,
"Marty McFadden" <marty_mcfadden@ogden-energy.com>, "Lynn Lednicky"
<lale@dynegy.com>, "Larrea, John" <John.g.Larrea@williams.com>, "kent
Palmerton" <kent.palmerton@williams.com>, "Ken Hoffman"
<khoffman@caithnessenergy.com>, "Kate Castillo" <ccastillo@riobravo-gm.com>,
"Kassandra Gough" <kgough@calpine.com>, "Jonathan Weisgall"
<jweisgall@aol.com>, "John Stout" <john_h_stout@reliantenergy.com>, "Joe
Ronan" <joer@calpine.com>, "Joe Greco" <jgreco@caithnessenergy.com>, "Jim
Willey" <elliottsa@earthlink.net>, "Jeff Dasovich" <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>,
"Jack Pigott" <jackp@calpine.com>, "Jack Hawks" <jack.hawks@gen.pge.com>,
"Hap Boyd" <rboyd@enron.com>, "Greg Blue" <gtbl@dynegy.com>, "Frazier
Blaylock" <frayblay@aol.com>, "Frank DeRosa"
<fderosa@sanfrancisco.usgen.com>, "Eric Eisenman"
<eric.eisenman@gen.pge.com>, "Eileen Koch" <eileenk@calpine.com>, "Ed Tomeo"
<ed.tomeo@uaecorp.com>, "Duane Nelson" <dnelsen@msn.com>, "Doug Fernley"
<fernley.doug@epenergy.com>, "Dean Gosselin" <dean_gosselin@fpl.com>, "David
Parquet" <dparque@ect.enron.com>, "Curtis Kebler"
<curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com>, "Curt Hatton" <Curt.Hatton@gen.pge.com>,
"Craig Chancellor" <craigc@calpine.com>, "Cody Carter"
<cody.carter@williams.com>, "Carolyn Baker" <cabaker@duke-energy.com>, "Bob
Gates" <bob.gates@enron.com>, "Bob Escalante" <rescalante@riobravo-gm.com>,
"Bob Ellery" <bellery@spi-ind.com>, "Bill Woods" <billw@calpine.com>, "Bill
Carlson" <william_carlson@wastemanagement.com>, "Alex Sugaoka"
<alex.sugaoka@UAECORP.COM>, "Bob Szymanski" <rjszymanski@powerworksinc.com>,
"Chris Ellison" <CTE@eslawfirm.com>, "Doug Kerner" <dkk@eslawfirm.com>, "Andy
Brown" <ABB@eslawfirm.com>, "Sandi McCubbin" <smccubbi@enron.com>, "Susan
McCabe" <smccabe@mccabeandcompany.net>, "Scott Govenar"
<sgovenar@govadv.com>, "Ron Tom" <thackbarth@govadv.com>, "Robert Ross"
<robbiz@cwo.com>, "Rina Venturini" <rventurini@teamgsi.net>, "Phil Isenberg"
<Isenberg@HMOT.com>, "Mike Monagan" <mrmonagan@aol.com>, "Maureen OHaren"
<Oharen@HMOT.com>, "Marie Moretti" <mmoretti@mccabeandcompany.net>, "Jamie
Parker" <jparker@hmot.com>, "Hedy Govenar" <hgovenar@govadv.com>, "Fred
Pownall" <fred_pownall@ka-pow.com>, "Delany Hunter" <dhunter@s-k-w.com>,
"Chuck Cole" <ccole@advocation-inc.com>, "Bev Hansen" <bhansen@lhom.com>,
"Anne Kelly" <kelly@hnks.com>, "Mark Nobili" <mnobili@cal-lobby.com>
		 Subject: Legislative Status Report Week Ending 4/27

Date: April 27, 2001
To:  Jan Smutny-Jones, Steven Kelly, Katie Kaplan
Cc:  IEP Board Members
From:  Julee Malinowski-Ball
Re:  Legislative Status Report Week Ending 4/27

RECENT EVENTS

-- Rule #1: Never assume an issue is done until the ink is dry from the
Governor's signature (and even then you never know).  The Senate Republicans
agreed late this week to oppose SB 28x (Sher), which makes several
IEP-sponsored proposals to the siting process, due to a controversial
provision added in the Assembly Appropriations Committee regarding
unemployment compensation.  Assembly Republicans let it slide on process
because CMTA and the Chamber's objections to the egregious language was so
last minute.  Senate Republicans had more time to look at the issue and
agreed not to let it go forward.  Since they control of the final vote in a
bill requiring two-thirds, their united opposition stopped the bill, one
vote shy.  The author was granted reconsideration and discussions will be
on-going over the next week on how to proceed.  The best-case scenario at
this point is getting one Republican to drop from the ranks.  Worst-case
scenario is the bill dies, and our language gets picked up in another
vehicle starting the whole process all over again.  The more likely
scenario, however, lies somewhere in between.  Parties will agree to some
compromise language, send the bill back to the Assembly to make the
appropriate changes, then bring it back to the Senate for a clean vote.

-- Long-term contracting was moved to the front burner this week by Asm.
Wright (AB 57) and Senator Morrow (SB 997), both with different results.
Both measures, which are almost identical, set forth a criteria which, if
followed by an IOU when signing a long-term contract with an energy
supplier, would eliminate the need for a reasonableness review by the CPUC.
AB 57 passed out of the Assembly Utilities and Commerce committee with
little discussion and a few technical amendments.  SB 997 faced a longer,
more difficult hearing in front of Senator Bowen's Energy Committee.  IEP,
along with the three IOUs testified in support of the measure, while TURN
expressed great concerns with the concept of leaving the CPUC out of the
picture.  In the end, the Senate committee agreed to put the bill off for
further discussions, passed a motion in support of getting the appropriate
rule waver so the bill can be heard again after Friday's policy committee
deadline, and scheduled a stakeholder meeting for Thursday morning.  Senator
Burton announced on the Senate Floor Thursday morning, however, that all
requests for rule wavers would be denied.  AB 57 appears to be the only
active vehicle on this issue, and IEP will be at the negotiating table
providing input on the language as it moves forward.

-- AB 60x is scheduled for hearing next week in the Senate Energy Committee.
IEP met with committee staff this week, which revealed some possible
latitude in amending the bill.  IEP and other member company lobbyists will
be pushing hard for an opposed position from the rest of the committee
before the hearing Tuesday afternoon.  At this time, however, we do not have
any alternative language for the bill.  After further review by some IEP
member companies, the previously drafted amendments appear unworkable and
were withdrawn from consideration.  We anticipate on waiting to see where
the committee on Tuesday takes the issue before another attempt at drafting
alternative language.

-- SB 1x (Soto/Scott) was amended this week before its hearing in the Senate
Appropriations committee next week.  The new language finds a backdoor to
the price cap issue by imposing a 100 percent tax on the sale of electric
power that exceeds a base price of $80 per MW/hr.  CMTA, the Chamber and
CalTax will be coordinating strategy for the hearing with IEP and the
generators, but despite the bill's multiple constitutional and legal
problems, most admit the measure will move forward with little trouble.  A
new player on the scene will probably provide the most noteworthy testimony.
InterGen North America, which is developing a 900 MW power plant in Palm
Springs, plans on testifying that if this measure is signed by the Governor,
they will absolutely pull the project and go to Oklahoma.

-- Newly amended this week is AB 67x (Cardoza), which now makes it a felony
for a corporation that sells electricity or natural gas at unjust or
unreasonable rates. Sponsored by Lt. Governor Bustamante, the measure
establishes stiff fines and possible jail time, that could be subject to the
state's "three strikes" law.  AB 67x has already generated opposition from
Republicans and constitutional questions from legal experts.   Although
Cardoza noted that several aspects of the bill are unresolved and could
change, the intent will remain the same, and he insists that energy
companies that take advantage of Californians will still face significant
penalties.

-- SB 6x, (Burton), which establishes a State Power Authority, passed the
Assembly this week by a 48 to 28 vote.  The measure needs the Senate to
concur on the Assembly amendments before it heads to the Governor's desk.

-- Attached are the most recent legislative tracking reports for both the
special and regular sessions.  Please call if you need copies of any of the
bills.

UPCOMING EVENTS

MONDAY, April 30th
Senate Appropriations Committee
SB 1x (Soto) - excess profits tax
SB 30x (Brulte) - local government incentives

Assembly Energy Costs and Availability Subcommittee on Natural Gas Costs and
Availability
Informational Hearing

TUESDAY, May 1st
Senate Energy Committee
AB 60x (Hertzberg) - California First

MONDAY, May 7th
Senate Appropriations Committee
SB 64x (Costa) - biomass incentive

ON THE SENATE FLOOR
SB 28x (Sher) - siting proposals
SB 6x (Burton)  - State Power Authority

--end--

Julee Malinowski-Ball
Senior Associate
Edson + Modisette
916-552-7070
FAX-552-7075
jmball@ns.net

 - 2001 Tracking Report.doc
 - 2001 Tracking Report.special session.doc


One Jackson Square
Jackson, MI 49201

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Jones, Tana
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 4:29 PM
To: Philipson, Fred
Subject: Re: NDA Request

Do you have the address for the counterparty?

	Fred Philipson/ENRON@enronXgate 04/25/2001 04:17 PM 	   To: Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT  cc:   Subject: NDA Request

Tana:

Can you please mail back an NDA with the following information within it:

Prospect:
CMS Energy Marketing Services and Trading (Legal name)

Topic:
Using Enron's back office services to process their energy deal transactions.

This has nothing to do with EnronOnline.  Please do not include EnronOnline
terminology in the NDA, as it will only delay this effort.  Thanks in advance
for your timely response.

Fred Philipson
5-9323


To Members of the RTO West Stage 2 Market Monitoring, Planning,
Provisions/Requirements and Scheduling Content Groups:

Hello!

In case you haven't already received it, I thought you would be
interested in FERC's RTO West order which was issued yesterday.

Cheers, Kristi

(I apologize to those of you who receive multiple copies of this e-mail
(you will if you are on more than one of the above-referenced content
groups.))

 - RTO West Order.pdf


Mark:

I thought you might be interested in this.

Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT on 07/18/2000 04:01 PM -----

	Peter Keohane
	Sent by: Linda Sietzema
	07/18/2000 03:54 PM

		 To: Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Gaffney/TOR/ECT@ECT, William S
Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Suttle/HOU/ECT@ECT, Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Set-off - Alberta Court of Appeal Decision in Blue Range Resource
Corporation Insolvency

Please see the attached memo.

Peter


Please remove me from your distribution list as I have moved to a new group.

Thanks,
Robin

Susan D Trevino
03/09/2001 04:56 PM
To: Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, John D Powell/HOU/ECT, Ron Nolte/Enron,
Jason Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rudi Zipter/HOU/ECT, Todd Warwick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris
Abel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tracey Irvin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Manfred Roenz/Corp/Enron, Clara
Carrington/HOU/ECT, Minal Dalia/HOU/EES@EES, Homan Amiry/LON/ECT@ECT,
Christian LeBroc/Corp/Enron, Xochitl Figueroa/NA/Enron, Burton
McIntyre/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bjorn Hagelmann/HOU/ECT, Sunil Dalal/Corp/Enron, Terri
Harlan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robin Rodrigue/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bilal Bajwa/NA/Enron@Enron,
Marina Ng/NA/Enron@Enron, William E Kasemervisz/HOU/ECT, Anita
Luong/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nancy Hernandez/NA/Enron@ENRON, Mechelle
Stevens/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Snow/HOU/ECT, Gregory A Mausser/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Shari Mao/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kristen J Hanson/HOU/ECT
Subject: Book Request #697

The attached book request is complete.  Please contact me if you have any
questions.

Thank you,
Susan Trevino
x3-1462


Marie:  Per my voice mail, please let me know when you will have your memo
regarding brokerage agreements and the updated list available.  I would like
to include Susan Flynn, Sheila Glover and Laurel Adams in a meeting since
they are all involved in the brokerage agreement process from time to time.
I'll try to gather the group if you provide me with some suggested times.
Thanks.  Sara


As Enron continues to address the Human Capital Needs of the organization,
there are several changes in Enron,s Human Resources (HR) Organization I,d
like to share with you:

In Corporate Human Resources:

Brian Schaffer will lead the Office of Labor and Employment Relations
function, including Resource Management, Corporate Training activities, and
Workforce Development.

Mary Joyce will continue to have responsibility for Executive Compensation
and our Global Equity Plans.

Cynthia Barrow, in addition to Benefits, will be responsible for the
development of Work Life Programs across Enron.

Brad Coleman will be responsible for Analysis and Reporting, in addition to
the re-engineering of the HR Service Center.

Gerry Gibson will work closely with me to provide Organizational Development
& Training expertise for HR,s Continuing Evolution.

Andrea Yowman will be responsible for several projects which are critical to
HR,s on-going success including the SAP Implementation, Global Information
System (GIS) Database, and Total Compensation System Development.  In
addition, she will have responsibility for the Human Resource Information
System (HRIS).

The HR Generalist functions for Corporate will be handled by the following:

Gwen Petteway, Public Relations, Government Affairs, Legal, Investor
Relations, Corporate Development, EPSC, Aviation, Enron Federal Credit Union
and the Analyst and Associate Program

Kim Rizzi, Accounting and Human Resources

Sheila Walton, RAC, Finance and Enron Development Corp, in addition to her
responsibilities in ENA

At the Business Unit Level, we,ve established two Geographic Hubs for our
Wholesale Business Units:

Drew Lynch will be in London with the HR responsibility for the Eastern
Hemisphere including London, APACHI and India.  Drew,s Senior Leadership Team
will include:  Nigel Sellens, Ranen Sengupta and Scott Gilchrist.

David Oxley will be located in Houston with HR responsibility for the Western
Hemisphere including North America, CALME and South America.  David,s Senior
Leadership Team will include:  Miguel Padron, Janie Bonnard, Sheila Knudsen
and Cindy Skinner.

We believe these Hubs can result in a more effective HR organization and also
facilitate the movement of talent where needed in those regions.

The following are the HR Leaders responsible for the remaining Business
Units:

Dave Schafer  GPG
Gary Smith  Wind
Robert Jones  Net Works
Marla Barnard EBS
Ray Bennett  EES/EFS
Willie Williams EE&CC/NEPCO
Gerry Chatham EGEP

Please click on the following link to view the HR Organization Chart.
http://home.enron.com:84/messaging/ckoorgchart.ppt


If you have received this in error or wish to
unsubscribe from Investor Spec Sheet, please find
remove instructions at bottom of page.
_____________________________________

STOCK ALERT
Arabel Records

Arabel Records International, Inc. expands on its
development strategy
_____________________________________

Arabel Records International Inc. - Unity Through
Diversity - North American Record Label Decides On
Multi-Cultural Approach

Arabel Record International, Inc. (Pink Sheets: ARBL)
received a BUY recommendation from Investor Spec
Sheet on 12/11/01. A target price of $4.69 has been set
for FY2002.  See the complete Research Report at
www.investorcommunications.net/reports/arbl.
_____________________________________

Share-Related Items

Recent Price (1/14/02) $.17
Market Capitalization $4.08M
Shares Outstanding 24.0M
Float 6.0M
_____________________________________

Though there are a few acts currently under
development, the research clearly supports the Arabel
management's decision to focus a substantial amount of
its time, energy and development budget on a
Multi-Cultural Pop Act. The US success of the
Backstreet Boys is directly attributed to their initial
success in Asia and Europe. Given the multicultural
competitive edge, combined with critic's acclaim of the
music (lyrics, composition, arrangement), the Arabel
act could meet, if not exceed, Backstreet Boys success.

The idea is to bring together five of the best English as
a first language male performers in North America
between the ages of 17-22, regardless of their ethnic
heritage or belief system. The vision is to show that
through pop music, diverse cultures do get along and
can thrive as both a pop and business entity.

Economic, geographic, technological and social trend
research overwhelmingly supports the management's
decision to go in this direction. Developing countries
have been leading the globe in GDP for the past few
years, with China leading the way. It is estimated that
by 2010 China will have a middle class population of
500 million and India will have a middle class of 450
million. (For an enhanced demographic report:
www.investorcommunications.net/reports/arbl/ARBLa
ct.htm)

Foreign corporations, especially in economically
developing countries, will find the Multi-Cultural Act
concept very attractive for sponsorship and product
endorsement. Whether to increase their local visibility
through affiliation with a North American pop group or
to use this as a means to expand to other geographic
markets, Arabel will target both traditional and
non-traditional youth oriented sponsors.

For the last 10-15 years the youth culture in North
America has become increasingly more socially
conscious than ever before, but has also grown up with
an appreciation and acceptance of ethnic and cultural
diversity like no other previous generation. Especially
since 9-11 we believe an act that promotes pro-cultural
diversity by visual example will be readily accepted by
mainstream North American youth. Teens from other
regions around the world continue to be infatuated with
North American culture. Product and performance
sales for North American pop acts continue to break
records in these regions.

A Multi-Cultural Act will provide performers that
different ethnic groups around the globe can relate to
and identify with. This 'role model' appeal does not
only impact product sales (which can have certain hit
songs released with the chorus remixed in various
languages), but from a business perspective as well.
The focus on a Multi-Cultural Act is more than just a
short-term astute strategy. It not only allows Arabel to
remain true to its core value of business growth
through the strengths inherent with ethnic diversity, it
also positions the company on the ground floor of the
developing economies whose creative industries will
also be looking to develop through joint ventures with
North American companies.

The Company has retained 'The Investor Online' Group
for Investor Relations, to implement and maintain an
ongoing market awareness program for an initial
period of six months. See the complete Research
Report at
www.investorcommunications.net/reports/arbl.

CONTACT:
Arabel Records International Inc.
Mustak Buksh, 604/582-3483  (Investor Relations)
Fax: 604/582-3482
Email: arabelrecords@hotmail.com
Website: www.arabelrecords.com

or

Jeff Carter, 800/338-9644 (Media Relations)
Office Phone: 604/216-ARBL (2725)
Fax: 604/216-2726

_____________________________________

IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER

Financial Market Advisor is an independent electronic
publication providing information on selected public
companies.

Any company profiled by Financial Market Advisor
pays cash or stock consideration for the electronic
dissemination of the company's information for a
specified time period and/or our comments about the
company and/or our development of the company's
website. Section 17(b) of the Securities Act of 1933
requires that Financial Market Advisor fully disclose
the type consideration (i.e. cash, free trading stock,
restricted stock, restricted stock with registration
rights, stock options, stock warrants, or other type
consideration) and the specific amount of the
consideration our company receives or will receive,
directly or indirectly, from an issuer, underwriter, or
dealer.

No information contained in our website or our
publications should be considered as a solicitation to
purchase or sell the securities of the profiled
companies.

Financial Market Advisor is not a registered
investment advisor or a registered securities broker
dealer. We do not undertake or represent to make
investment recommendations or advise pertaining to
the purchase or sale of the securities mentioned in our
web site or publications. The information contained in
our website and publications are carefully compiled by
Financial Market Advisor based upon sources that we
believe to be reliable. Financial Market Advisor,
however, does not guarantee the accuracy of any
information contained in our website or publications.

Moreover, Financial Market Advisor does not endorse,
independently verify, or assert the truthfulness or
reliability of any statements or data made by us or the
profiled companies in our website or publications.
Investors should not rely solely on the information
contained in our website or publications. Instead,
investors should use the information provided on the
profiled companies only as a starting point for
conducting additional research that will permit them to
form their own opinions regarding an investment in the
profiled company's securities. The receipt of the
information contained in our website or publications
shall not create, under any circumstance, any
implication that there has been no change in the affairs
of the profiled company since the date of our
comments regarding the company or the date of the
profiled company press releases or other information
disseminated via our website or publications.

The information contained in our website and
publications may pertain to small cap and/or thinly
traded securities which by their very nature involve an
extremely high degree of risk. An investment in these
type of securities could result in the loss of some or all
of an investment in the company. In addition, due to
the illiquid nature of some of these securities, an
investor may find encounter difficulties in liquidating
the securities.

Financial Market Advisor may liquidate the stock
consideration it receives at any time it deems it
appropriate to do so. The liquidation of our stock may
have a negative impact on the securities of the
company liquidated, including decreased market value
and/or dilution of the company's securities.

The following companies have paid, or have agreed to
pay the parent company of Financial Market Advisor
to: distribute the company's information and reports in
an email newsletter; post company links on featured
companies page, and compile and distribute quarterly
reports in an email newsletter.

Arabel Records International Inc. has agreed to pay
50,000 shares of free trading company stock and
75,000 shares of restricted company stock with
piggyback rights for IR and research services for a
period of six months.

---
You are currently subscribed to specsheet-txt-2 as: alewis@ect.enron.com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-specsheet-txt-2-1605506T@mail.stockadvisor.ws


Today's EnronOnline numbers are as follows:

	Transactions = 5,269 (up from 4825)
	Total Users Transacting = 944 (up from 898)
	Total Counterparties = 248 (up from 231)

Eric


Please ignore my last list and use this one!!