See Below for 2 articles re: Edison and reregulation....

DJ Edison To Call For End To Calif Elec
Dereg Wed -Sources

Copyright (c) 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

LOS ANGELES (Dow Jones)--Edison International (EIX),
saying the current state of
California's power markets threatens the company with
bankruptcy, will call Wednesday
for an end to California's four-year experiment with
deregulation, sources familiar with
the issue told Dow Jones Newswires.

John Bryson, chief executive of Edison International,
is expected to announce that
the company's regulated utility unit, Southern California
Edison, won't be able to
recover more than $3 billion in losses related to power
purchases and continue serving
its retail customers unless the state's deregulated market
structure is scrapped.

In a move tantamount to a call for reregulation,
Edison will propose to break ground
on new power plants within 90 days and re-enter the
power-generation business
Southern California Edison was required to exit under the
state's landmark 1996
deregulation law, the sources said.

Edison plans to follow the announcement by filing a
request with state regulators to
increase retail electricity rates by as much as 20%, the
sources said, even though
regulators rejected Edison's request for a rate increase
of 10% last week.

The utility has lined up the support of some state
lawmakers for the broader
proposal, which would require action by the state
legislature, the sources said.

Southern California Edison, with 4.2 million
customers, is one of the country's largest
electric utilities. Edison was the first of the state's
utilities to sign on to the deregulation
effort and, as it says on its Web site, "played a central
role in the restructuring of the
electric industry in California."

Among the concessions won by utilities in 1996 is the
rate freeze, which they
demanded to help them recover costs related to
deregulation but which is now
producing huge losses.

Edison's current losses stem from an imbalance
between the soaring prices it must
pay to purchase power on the wholesale markets and the
fixed rate at which it can sell
power to its customers.

About half of those losses are offset the utility's
own power sales revenues, which
are accounted for separately and used to pay down
deregulation-related debt. Rising
power costs have produced a surplus in that account.
Edison wouldn't reveal the
current size of the surplus, but said previously that the
California Power Exchange paid
the utility $1.3 billion over its generating costs for
power through the end of September,
at a time when its power-purchase losses were $2.4
billion.

Power-Purchase Losses Mounting

The net losses continue to mount. California's
wholesale power prices hovered at
record levels all summer and spiked even higher in the
past two weeks, as colder
weather arrived in the Northwest at a time when much of
California's power supply was
down for maintenance.

The price of power for delivery Wednesday in
California hit an average of $1,182 a
megawatt-hour Tuesday, up from $250 a megawatt-hour a week
ago, the result of high
demand and a decision by California's wholesale market
operator to lift its cap on prices.

The rate Southern California Edison can charge its
retail customers, however, is fixed
at $66/MWh.

Last week, Merrill Lynch & Co. (MER) downgraded its
ratings for Edison
International and PG&E Corp. (PCG), the parent of
California's other major utility, Pacific
Gas & Electric, to neutral, saying the utilities may be
forced to file for bankruptcy if the
state doesn't allow them to raise their retail rates.

A Morgan Stanley Dean Witter (MDW) analyst drew the
same conclusion Monday,
also cutting his rating to neutral.

Edison to this point has kept its power-purchase
losses off its earnings statement, in
hopes that a political or regulatory solution will allow
them to be collected later.

The California Public Utilities Commission put the
hope of such a solution further out
of reach last week, however, when it ruled against rate
increases sought by Edison and
PG&E.

Credit rating agency Fitch Inc. on Monday lowered its
ratings for Edison
International and Southern California Edison's senior
unsecured debt to the A-minus
level, citing "increased liquidity pressure" and
uncertainty about the utilities' ability to
recover the costs of their power purchases. The agency
downgraded Edison
International, the parent, because half its consolidated
cash flow is provided by
Southern California Edison.

Edison - which sources said plans to remain in the
retail electricity business - said
late last week that it has secured a $1 billion line of
credit and expects to have enough
cash on hand to continue to pay for wholesale electricity
for the next several months.

California paid more than $1 billion for power last
week, sources said. Some of that,
however, was paid to Southern California Edison, which
still generates about 2,800
megawatts of power in the state.

Shares in Edison International have fallen 21% over
the past three weeks. They
closed Wednesday at $18.56, down $0.06.

-By Jason Leopold, Dow Jones Newswires; 323-658-3874;
mailto:jason.leopold@dowjones.com(Mark Golden contributed
to this article.)

Katie Kaplan
Manager of State Policy Affairs
Independent Energy Producers Association
(916) 448-9499

-----Original Message-----
From: Katie Kaplan [mailto:kaplan@iepa.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2000 10:50 AM
To: William Hall; Trond Aschehoug; Tony Wetzel; Susan J Mara; Steve Ponder;
Steve Iliff; Scott Noll; Roger Pelote; Rob Lamkin; Randy Hickok; Paula Soos;
Marty McFadden; Lynn Lednicky; Kent Fickett; Ken Hoffman; Jonathan Weisgall;
Joe Ronan; Joe Greco; Jim Willey; Jeff Dasovich; Jack Pigott; Hap Boyd; Greg
Blue; Frank DeRosa; Eric Eisenman; Eileen Koch; Ed Tomeo; Duane Nelsen; Dean
Gosselin; Dave Parquet; Curtis Kebler; Curt Hatton; Cody Carter; Carolyn
Baker; Bob Escalante; Bill Woods; Bill Carlson; Kate Castillo; Pigott Jack;
Tom Ross; Sue Mara; Stephanie-Newell; Richard Hyde; Paula Hall-Collins;
Norton Kelli; McNally Ray; Marty Wilson; Kristin Vellandi; kent Palmerton;
Katie Kaplan; Kassandra Gough; Karen Edson; Julee Malinowski-Ball; John
Stout; Jeff Dasovich; Jean Munoz; Jan Smutny-Jones; Bob Weisenmiller; B
Brown Andy; Andy Brown; Douglas Kerner
Cc: Douglas Kerner; Julee Malinowski-Ball; Karen Edson; Andy Brown; B Brown
Andy
Subject: FYI-Edison wants back in the generation business

Edison Mission Energy Power Project Starts Construction After Expedited
Approval By California Energy Commission

Monday December 11 6:39pm
Source: Dow Jones

Operation Targeted for August

IRVINE, Calif., Dec. 11 /PRNewswire/ -- Edison Mission Energy (EME), an
Edison International company (NYSE: EIX), started construction of its new
Sunrise power plant on Thursday, December 7, having received expedited
approval from the California Energy Commission (CEC) to proceed. The
power generation facility will be located in Kern County, California, and
will bring both short- and long-term generation capacity to the state, which
is in
dire need of new power generation.

"From the onset of the California power crisis, we have sought to find
means to bring new power to the California market," said John E. Bryson,
chairman and CEO of Edison International. "This CEC approval will help
ensure that this critical new project will be able to provide a significant
amount
of new peaking power to the state as soon as next August. Our thanks and
appreciation go to the California Energy Commission, and the
environmental and regulatory agencies for their swift consideration of this
important project."

"This power has been offered by contract to the state so that the pricing
for it does not depend on California's broken deregulated power market,"
said
Alan J. Fohrer, president and CEO of EME. "Alternatively, EME will seek to
enter into a long-term, cost-based contract with either Pacific Gas &
Electric Company or San Diego Gas & Electric Company to further ensure that
California's consumers reap the benefit of this additional power
resource," Fohrer said.

The Sunrise Power Project will be completed in two phases. Phase 1 will
consist of a 320-megawatt (MW), simple-cycle peaking facility scheduled to
be in service during the summer 2001. Phase 2 will convert the peaking
facility to a 560-MW, combined-cycle operation with an in-service date of
summer 2003. The project will meet or exceed all pertinent environmental
and safety standards.

Final regulatory approvals have been received for Phase I of the project
only.

EME will be seeking expedited permitting approval for the Phase II
expansion in line with the fast-track approval process recently enacted by
the
California legislature.

EME has also negotiated an agreement with the labor unions for an adequate
supply of highly skilled labor in order to achieve an accelerated
construction schedule. The accelerated schedule is aimed at providing this
additional power to California by next summer.

Edison Mission Energy specializes in the development, acquisition,
construction management and operation of global power production facilities.
As
one of the world's leading global power producers, Edison Mission Energy
owns nearly 23,000 megawatts of generating capacity, including interests in
75 projects currently under construction or operating in Australia,
Indonesia, Italy, New Zealand, Puerto Rico, Spain, Thailand, Turkey, the
United
Kingdom and the United States.

Based in Rosemead, Calif., Edison International is a premier international
electric power generator, distributor and structured finance provider. With
a
portfolio of approximately 28,000 megawatts, Edison International is an
industry leader in privatized, deregulated and incentive-regulated markets
and
power generation. It is the parent company of Edison Mission Energy,
Southern California Edison, Edison Capita, Edison Enterprises and Edison
O&M Services.

/CONTACT: Kevin Kelley of Edison Mission Energy, 626-302-1033, Fax,
626-302-7827/ 21:35 EST

Katie Kaplan
Manager of State Policy Affairs
Independent Energy Producers Association
(916) 448-9499


I had to make one more change to the sept. schedule.  It only effects bert, linder, merriss and anderson.  Please check it soon

bert


Your eRequest's password is 2211
To use this password, go to the eRequest website and click on non-Corp logon.
Put in your email address and the password above and click Log In, and you will log into eRequest.


Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2000 15:52:06 -0600
From: "Tracey Bradley" <tbradley@bracepatt.com>
To: <asettanni@bracepatt.com>, "Charles Ingebretson"
<cingebretson@bracepatt.com>,
<cshoneman@bracepatt.com>,<dwatkiss@bracepatt.com>, <gfoote@bracepatt.com>,
"Gene Godley" <ggodley@bracepatt.com>, <jjava@bracepatt.com>,
<kcurry@bracepatt.com>, "Marc Hebert" <mhebert@bracepatt.com>,
<mhenry@bracepatt.com>, "Paul Fox" <pfox@bracepatt.com>,
<rcarroll@bracepatt.com>, <rrich@bracepatt.com>, <tbradley@bracepatt.com>
Cc: "Nancy Pickover" <npickover@bracepatt.com>
Subject: Nov. 1, 2000 DOE Press Release re Clinton/Gore Initiatives to Assist
California
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline

Administration Helps Electricity Consumers by Proposing Reliability Standards
and Working to Lower Costs

Clinton/Gore Administration Takes Action to Help Californians

Secretary of Energy Bill Richardson today announced a series of initiatives
that the Clinton/Gore Administration is taking to help California reduce the
strain on their electricity system and protect consumers. Most significantly,
Richardson said the Administration will likely send a proposed rule-making to
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to establish mandatory
reliability standards for electricity * doing administratively what Congress
failed to accomplish this year.

"California's electricity market has become dysfunctional -- and it's time to
make it right," said Secretary Richardson. "More than once, California was
close to having blackouts rolling throughout the state. In San Diego,
residents and businesses saw their electric bills double almost overnight.
Consumers need an electricity system that is reliable and they should not be
facing this kind of price volatility."

Richardson made the announcement in Sacramento this morning with California
Gov. Gray Davis.

Richardson said the Energy Department will take several initiatives to help
the reliability of California's electricity system and protect consumers from
dramatic price volatility, including:

Establish mandatory reliability standards for electricity * The Energy
Department will seek public comment on a proposed rulemaking that would
require utilities to follow mandatory rules to protect the reliability of the
electric grid in California and elsewhere. The Administration and others have
been pressing Congress to enact these much-needed rules to protect consumers.
The purpose of this rulemaking is to break the impasse in Congress and
authorize establishing the standards necessary to make electricity supplies
more reliable and energy markets more efficient;

Improve California's ability to import power * The Western Area Power
Administration, an Energy Department agency that co-owns a major substation
in Northern California, will provide $2 million to add a second transformer
there. This will help California bring in much-needed power from the Pacific
Northwest;

Provide millions to improve energy efficiency * The department is releasing a
half million dollars in grants to the California Energy Commission to support
programs that will make California buildings, which account for approximately
8 percent of all the energy used in buildings in the U.S., more energy
efficient. In addition to the $3.7 million the Energy Department has provided
the state this year to help weatherize 3,081 lower-income California
households, the department will provide $4.2 million next year to weatherize
homes and help lower the electricity bills of those that can least afford
high prices;

Work to add renewable sources * The department is working with the state and
local governments to help develop the tremendous renewable resources in
California, such as wind, solar, geothermal and biomass. To this end,
Richardson said the department's budget for next year contains $3 million for
wind projects and $5.6 million for geothermal projects in California;

Reduce electricity consumption at key times * Participate, along with
representatives from other federal agencies with facilities in California, in
meetings in Sacramento today to develop a process for reducing electricity
consumption during heat waves; and

Get federal power to California * Continue the work of the department's
Bonneville Power Administration and Western Area Power Administration with
California to get federal power to the state when it is needed the most.
Richardson announced that Bonneville's contract to provide low-cost power to
Bay Area Rapid Transit will continue;

Further cooperation with California * The Energy Department will also form a
partnership with the state of California to ensure that the department's
programs and resources are put to use to help the state with its electric
problems.

Separately today FERC released a report that examines the causes of
California's electricity problems. FERC also issued a proposed order that
will help reduce wholesale electricity prices in California. Richardson urged
the Commission to move quickly to help protect California's citizens and
businesses.

Media Contact: April Kaufman, 202/586-5806

Release No. R-00-283


This is great - two please

-----Original Message-----
From: Alon, Heather
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2001 4:07 PM
To: Kitchen, Louise
Subject: : Most Powerful Women in Business

Hi Louise,

Hope you are having a very Happy Boss' Day.
 How do you like this layout for the Fortune article?

~Heather

-


Unbeatable
		  holiday savings! Promotions valid on reconsults AND refills thru Jan
		  15, 2002!

Special
			holiday discounts on reconsultations and refills from VirtualMedicalGroup.com!
			Order today and receive your reconsultation for only $25 & pay
			only $49 for any new consultation for these conditions below.
			Get a head start on your New Year's resolutions!

			  Men's
				Impotence (Viagra)

				Get Protectra or Ultra V Cream FREE
				with purchase

			  Hair
				Loss (Propecia)

				Reduced pricing on Rogaine

			  Smoking
				Cessation (Zyban)

				Reduced consultation

			  Weight
				Loss (Xenical)

				Reduced pricing on Xenical

			  Depression
				or Anxiety (Paxil, Prozac, Zoloft)

				Reduced pricing

			  Female
				Impotence - (FDA Approved
				- Eros)

				FREE Vitara
				with your order

VirtualMedicalGroup
			partners with 1stOnlinePharmacy.Com to fulfill your prescription needs.

			If do not wish to receive special promotions from us any longer (you
			will still receive refill reminders), please click here
			to unsubscribe and type "REMOVE" in the subject line.

©
			2001 VirtualMedicalGroup.Com

			All rights reserved. All trademarks and registered trademarks are
			of their respective companies.

This
			message is in full compliance with U.S. Federal requirements for commercial
			email under bill S.1618 Title lll, Section 301, Paragraph (a)(2)(C)
			passed by the 105th U.S. Congress and cannot be considered SPAM since
			it includes a remove mechanism.


ON further reflection, if Mavrix is to be a wholly owned sub of Enron
Pipeline Company (or whatever the current name is of the top-tier ETS entity)
then that entity ought to issue the guaranty.  Mavrix intends to buy capacity
from TW and possibly NN.  It would be innappropriate to have TW issue the
guaranty if TWs guaranty would likely operate in favor of TW.  Same for NN.
DF

Rod Hayslett

01/31/2001 01:16 PM
To: Jerry Peters/NPNG/Enron@ENRON
cc: Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan
Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Tracy
Geaccone/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, John Jesse/NPNG/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Mavrix

The consideration isn't the point, its the fact that a creditworthy party,
Enron for instance, has guaranteed the business and in fact they are
creditworthy.    Therefore we haven't given Mavrix a special deal compared to
other shippers, since they are now by way of the guarantee creditworthy.
As I told you on the phone, Enron will do this for others as well, it's just
not cheap, it's like dealing with the guys in the pool hall!

Jerry Peters
01/31/2001 12:56 PM
To: Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON
cc: Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan
Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Tracy
Geaccone/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, John Jesse/NPNG/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Mavrix

What is the objective of having Mavrix pay its parent/affliate (ETS) a
guarantee fee?   Will this prove that granting credit was
non-discriminatory?  I would argue no, since we don't look at the
consideration paid for guarantees of other companies.  The fact that a
credit-worthy party has issued a guarantee should be enough.  Legally, Mavix
is a separate company.  Parent companies frequently guarantee obligations of
subsidiaries without any direct consideration (other than enabling their
subsidiary to transact business).

Rod Hayslett

01/31/2001 07:56 AM
To: Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven
Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Tracy Geaccone/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Jerry
Peters/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, John Jesse/NPNG/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Mavrix

I didn't necessarily mean that we would pay a third party, just someone else
at Enron.

	From:  Mary Kay Miller                           01/31/2001 07:14 AM

To: Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON
cc: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven
Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Tracy Geaccone/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Jerry
Peters/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, John Jesse/NPNG/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Mavrix

I agree with Rod.  By having it done by an outside party seems to make more
sense from an external view.   MK

Rod Hayslett

01/31/2001 06:40 AM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven
Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Tracy Geaccone/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Jerry
Peters/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, John Jesse/NPNG/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Mavrix

First, Mavrix is a subsidiary of what company?     I don't believe I have
seen that anywhere, but had heard that it was TW.   If it is not a subsidiary
of NNG why would NNG issue a guaranty for Mavrix?     I can have the
guarantee priced and then Mavrix can pay to have someone guarantee it's
positions.     This is not rocket science, but I believe we need to make an
effort to keep things looking like they are at arms length and that this is a
separate company.     If you all agree, let me know and I can have someone
get with Steve Harris and get the guaranty priced.

For Jerry and John:   Let me know but I think we can get this priced down
here inside the day.     Let me know how you want to proceed.

Drew Fossum
01/30/2001 06:01 PM
To: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rod
Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Tracy Geaccone/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Mavrix

I guess you wouldn't want to use any of the joint venture entities to issue
the guarantee because of the complexities of their ownership structures.  You
also wouldn't want to go outside of ETS because of marketing affiliate
issues.  By process of elimination, I guess I'm OK with NN issuing the
guarantee.  In my view, if Mavrix' commercial strategies are unsuccessful and
Northern has to perform on the guarantee, good luck recovering any of those
dollars in Northern's next rate case.  Thanks.  DF

Susan Scott
01/30/2001 02:27 PM
To: Drew Fossum@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven
Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Tracy
Geaccone/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Mavrix

Mavrix Transportation Trading Corp., which is a subsidiary of ETS, needs to
satisfy TW's creditworthiness requirements in order to enter into a
transportation agreement with TW.  Paul Cherry has suggested that Northern
Natural Gas issue a guarantee.  Please let me know whether you think this
would be acceptable.  If Mavrix wanted to hold NNG capacity, TW could issue
the guarantee.


Dear Derivatives Week subscriber:

Catch the latest breaking news in this week's issue by clicking
here: http://www.derivativesweek.com

Top stories this week:
_________________________________________________________
Bank of China has joined the International Swaps and Derivatives
Association, breaking new ground as its first Chinese member. An official
at ISDA called the Chinese banking giant's move a significant milestone,
signaling the acceptance of international derivative standards by a major
bank in an immature, but potentially massive market.

Bank of America has embarked on a hiring spree as part of an aggressive
expansion of its equity and credit derivative business in Asia, particularly
Japan. The bank is launching its first equity derivative operations in Japan
and is also expanding its structured credit products capabilities,
establishing
Tokyo as a new hub for structuring, trading and marketing to Asia.

Member firms of the International Swaps and Derivatives Association
are divided over the capital adequacy treatment for banks versus securities
firms in the European Commission consultation paper. ISDA has to resolve
the controversy before submitting its response to the EC paper by the middle
of this month.?

Indian Oil Corp., India's largest commercial enterprise, is gearing up its
first use of derivatives and has hired a consultant to help it prepare a
policy
guideline to present to its board of directors. India Oil could be the first
public
sector company to use derivatives.???
_________________________________________________________
As a DW subscriber, you are eligible for complimentary access to the
Subscribers Only area of the <www.derivativesweek.com> site, which
contains the current issue and a searchable archive of all past issues.
Use your User ID and Password to access the entire site. If you don't
have these yet, hit 'REPLY' to this email, fill out the proper information
below, and send it back to me. I'll get you set up right away!

===============================

Newsletter Title:
My name is:
My company is:
My city location is:

I choose my new user name to be:
I choose my new password to be:

===============================
?
If you'd prefer, call our Customer Service Department at 212-224-3800
and give them the information above.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
YOUR USER NAME AND PASSWORD ARE FOR YOUR PERSONAL
USE ONLY.? THEY MAY NOT BE SHARED WITH ANYONE AND
NO ONE ELSE SHOULD ACCESS THE SITE WITH YOUR USER NAME
AND PASSWORD.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

If you have questions, comments or suggestions, please do not hesitate
to call me at 1-212-224-3034.

Thanks and enjoy this week's issue.

Jim Beecher
Publisher

NOTE: You will receive weekly updates of the hottest stories in
Derivatives Week. These are not random mass mailings but
rather one-time messages for your personal attention. If you do
not wish to continue to receive these notices, please click 'reply',
type 'remove' and enter your name and company. You will then
be removed from our email database.


Effective today, I am designating Janel Guerrero as the primary point person for Enron's comprehensive RTO efforts.  In this capacity, she will be coordinating all of the advocacy functions outside of the FERC mediation process. This effort is absolutely of the highest priority for the company. Please cooperate with Janel to the fullest and coordinate with her on all of your strategic efforts and communications that are related to the RTO effort.

Thanks very much.

Additional details regarding our RTO campaign are attached.  Please feel free to call either Janel or myself with any questions you may have.


> 	Here is a transcription of the tentative ruling:
>
> Granted subject to protective order that the specific documents
> established to be confidential or otherwise subject to protection not be
> disclosed outside the offices of the California Attorney General or the
> Attorneys General of other states that agree to no further disclosure
> without prior court order.
>
We did not learn of this tentative until after 4:30 today, although it was
probably posted sometime earlier in the afternoon.  The local rule states
that a party who wishes to argue the tentative shall notify opposing counsel
before 4:30. We called their attorneys after 4:30, but before 5 PM. I
reached Martin Goyette, counsel for the AG personally by phone shortly after
five, and notified him of our intention to argue. He claimed the AG would
not appear to argue given late notice. I have notified him by fax of our
intention to argue.

>
>
>

=======================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to postmaster@brobeck.com
BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP
http://www.brobeck.com


Find attached the EGM Management Summary and Hot List as of 12/14.  Please
contact me if you have any questions or comments.

Thanks,
Jeff

---------------------- Forwarded by Jeff Smith/HOU/ECT on 12/15/2000 02:30 PM
---------------------------

Patricia Anderson
12/15/2000 12:30 PM
To: Jeff Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: 12/14 Management Summary

For distribution:

Thanks,
Patricia


Please click on the attached link to launch your Holiday Party invitation.

 http://invitation.enron.com

Please direct any questions to Dorie Hitchcock via email.


Ricardo,

What is your extension ?

I would like to ask you a few questions and talk to you about what data we
have available.

Chris Dorland


where the heck are you?


Can you help her out.
---------------------- Forwarded by Tracy Geaccone/GPGFIN/Enron on 02/05/2001 02:08 PM ---------------------------

Earline Kendall@ECT
02/05/2001 11:35 AM
To:	Tracy Geaccone/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject:	Re: FERC From 2

Can someone please show me how to access the Forms on the FERC, I tried that and did not get anywhere.
Thanks
Earline

<Embedded StdOleLink>


Janet and Elizabeth:
I made some chnages to the new draft that Janet sent around.  Let me know
what you think.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com


This request is approved.  Your request forms that you send still don't
provide enough information in layman's terms so that I know what you are
asking to be approved.  Are we working on this?
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 09/27/2000 08:31 AM
---------------------------

Rebecca Ford
09/26/2000 06:55 PM
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Your approval please

Greg Carraway is a member of my group.  Since Brad Diebner is no longer in
Financial Settlements, I am trying to set up Greg with access to the terminal
server so that he can use a laptop from home.  It is part of the inclement
weather plan.  I didn't know the approval would go to you, otherwise I would
have prompted you for the approval.

Thank you,
Becky

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Sally Beck                           09/26/2000 06:37 PM

To: Rebecca Ford/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Your approval please

I can never tell from these things what they are asking to be approved.
Since Gregory's address looks as if he is at Corp., just let me know who he
is and what I am being asked to approve.  Please reply with history
attached.  Thanks. --Sally
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 09/26/2000 06:35 PM
---------------------------

Information Risk Management
09/26/2000 03:44 PM
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Your approval please

Below you will find a copy of a request that is awaiting your approval.
Please advise us as to your approval or rejection of this request by way of
email.

I thank you in advance for your cooperation in this matter.

Leola Barnett
IRM
x3-7965
---------------------- Forwarded by Information Risk Management/HOU/ECT on
09/26/2000 03:44 PM ---------------------------

	 Security Resource Request System				Pending VP Approval
 Resource Request					How to find the status of this request...
	General Information		Initials:

Requestor:	Rebecca Ford/HOU/ECT	Phone:	3-7723
Requested For:		Gregory Carraway/Corp/Enron
Request Type:	Update Access
RC #:	105613	WO #:
Company #:	0413	Priority:	High
Manager:	Rebecca Ford	VP:	Sally Beck
Location:			Houston
					In the Request Processing section, see the status column for each requested
resource.
					Look at the overall status of the request in the title bar above. The status
will display Closed when your request is complete.
					Click the "Status" button below.
Comments:
					Request #: RFOD-4NVM7P
					Submitted: 09/05/2000 11:34:29 AM

	Name	Cost	Status	Implementation Comments
	Application/Database
	Terminal Server 1-800 Number
Terminal Server 4.0
	Not Started
Not Started

	Request Processing Path
Processed By	Status	When	Comments

	Manager	Approved	09/05 11:34 AM

	VP

	Security

	Implementation

		Editing History (Only the last five (5) are shown)

Edit #	Past Authors	Edit Dates
1
2
3
4	Rebecca Ford
Rebecca Ford
Rebecca Ford
Rebecca Ford 	09/05/2000 11:22:22 AM
09/05/2000 11:34:07 AM
09/05/2000 11:34:27 AM
09/05/2000 11:34:29 AM


I thought this was cute. I wanted to share.
----- Forwarded by Charlotte Banks/Enron Communications on 12/07/00 09:18 AM
-----

	Claudette Daniels@ENRON
	12/07/00 08:16 AM

		 To:
		 cc: (bcc: Charlotte Banks/Enron Communications)
		 Subject: FW: Black Man

>
> > A Black Man
> >
> >   A Black Man walks into a bank in New York City and
> >   asks for the loan officer. He says he's going to
> >   Europe on business for two weeks and needs to
> >   borrow $5,000
> >
> >    The bank officer says the bank will need some kind
> >    of security for the loan, so the Black Man hands
> >    over the keys to a new Rolls Royce. The car is parked
> >    on the street in front of the bank, he has the title
> >    and everything checks out. The bank agrees to
> >    accept the car as collateral for the loan.
> >
> >    The bank's president and its officers all enjoy a
> >    good laugh at the black man for using a $250,000 Rolls
> >   as collateral against a $5,000 loan. An employee of
> >   the  bank then proceeds to drive the Rolls into the
> >  bank's  underground garage and parks it there.=20
> >
> >    Two weeks later, the Black Man returns, repays the
> >    $5,000 and the interest, which comes to $15.41.
> >  The loan officer says, "Sir, we are very happy to have
> >  had your business, and this transaction has worked out
> >    very nicely, but we are a little puzzled. While
> >  you were away, we checked you out and found that you
> >  are a  multimillionaire. What puzzles us is, why would
> >  you bother to borrow $5,000?
> >
> >    The Black Man replies. "Where else in New York
> >  City can I park my car for two weeks for only $15.41
> >  and  expect it to be there when I return?"
> >     A Smart Black Man.

____________________________________________________________________________
_________
Get more from the Web.  FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com


Your new cash books are being set up ASAP.  They tell me they will be ready no later than tomorrow.
Once those are set-up, Stephanie Sever will email you your new EOL id's.

Kam


How's this??


Hi there,

Did you come up with a "form" llc agreement in conjunction with the form
letter agreement, or is the Coral LLC agreement the latest thing?

Thanks,

Kay


The Following memo will be hand delivered to you in hard copy form on Tuesday
morning, Feb. 20.  We will enclose the pledge form and
an Enron matching gifts form for your convenience.

Our meeting with Bob May, Dean of the McCombs School of Business at
UT-Austin, was a great success.  We had 14 attendees who received an update
from Bob about the many great things going on in Austin, as well as
opportunities to participate in the &We,re Texas8 capital campaign.

After Bob,s presentation, the 14 Enron officers met separately and were
extremely supportive about the idea of contributing in a coordinated manner
to the McCombs School.  This was evidenced by an expression of intent in
giving totaling about $175,000 from just the 14 people!

Here is what we propose and how it would work.

1. The UT Alumni at Enron would pledge $1 million over four years to the
McCombs School.  This would consist of $500,000 of gifts from employees and a
matching $500,000 from Enron.

2. The matching program provided through the McCombs gift to the Business
School would match the $1 million.

3. The result would be a permanently endowed $2 million &Enron Chair8 to
support &star quality8 faculty for the school.  This will represent one of
the largest Faculty Chairs at the Business School.

A few additional details:

1. Each individual,s contribution will also be credited to their name (along
with the Enron match) for recognition purposes in Business School,s Annual
Report, President,s Associates, etc.  In other words, a $10,000 contribution
matched by Enron will be considered as a $20,000 contribution by that
individual for recognition purposes.

2. Enron has agreed to not count it,s match against an employee,s annual
matching gift limitation of $15,000, as long as the gift is coordinated in a
way that makes it a part of the &Enron Chair8.

3. The gift may also be counted toward any previous pledge made to the &We,re
Texas8 campaign as long as that pledge is not supporting a separately named
contribution.  Please let us know that this is your intent.

Please carefully consider this request.  I do not plan to finalize the pledge
until I receive responses from enough officers to support this contribution.
We have about 40 officers of Enron who are UT alumni and with some
participation by each of us, we will achieve this level of gift.  Our plans
are to follow this up with a broader opportunity for all Enron employees that
are UT alumni; however, the leadership of the group will determine our
success.

Thanks for your consideration and continuing support of The University of
Texas.


per my voicemail
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 05/25/2001
01:33 PM ---------------------------

"Wenner, Adam" <awenner@velaw.com> on 05/25/2001 09:28:18 AM
To: "Kean, Steven (Enron Corp.)" <skean@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Governor Davis' Power Grab

Steve - per my voicemail, before we released this article that I prepared,
we wanted to run it by you to make sure that Enron is comfortable with it.
Thanks, Adam.
          ++++++CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE+++++
The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged.  This
email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization
named above.  If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized
representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any,
or the information contained herein is prohibited.  If you have received
this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email
and delete this email from your system.  Thank You
 <<143590_1.DOC>>

 - 143590_1.DOC


FYI.
---------------------- Forwarded by James D Steffes/HOU/EES on 09/14/2000
11:39 AM ---------------------------

"Elizabeth A. VanDersarl" <liz@luntz.com> on 09/14/2000 10:50:27 AM
To: "'James D Steffes'" <jsteffe@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: RE: Luntz Presentation

Hi Jim,

 I apologize for not sending these to you earlier.  Please call me if
you have any problems with this transmission.

Regards,
Liz

 - Perfect soundbite.doc
 - PRINCIPLES.doc
 - Top Facts.doc
 - YOUR OPPONENT.doc
 - Pro-Dereg - revised.doc


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Kevin P Radous/Corp/Enron on 05/16/2001 09:40 AM ---------------------------
From:	Kevin P Radous on 05/16/2001 09:40 AM
To:	Ellen Wallumrod/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject:	Re: Peoples and North Shore

Ellen,

As far as I am concerned, the deals in question are with the Aruba Supply book which is being managed in Houston.
I have no control over that book.

Patrick Ryder (who is on vacation until May 18) is aware of the issue and was working on it the last time we talked.

If you have any questions feel free to give me a call.

Kevin

312-541-1198

<Embedded StdOleLink>


schedule
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 01/21/2001 02:49 PM -----

	Kathy Dodgen@EES
	01/19/2001 05:56 PM

		 To: Kenneth Lay/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David W
Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, Rick Buy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg
Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron, Karen S Owens@ees@EES, John
J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Vicki
Sharp/HOU/EES@EES
		 cc: Rosalee Fleming/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sherri Sera/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kay
Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol Moffett/HOU/EES@EES, Karen K Heathman/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Liz M Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nicki Daw/NA/Enron@Enron, Karen Owens/HOU/EES@EES,
Leasa Lopez/HOU/EES@EES
		 Subject: California Action and Next Steps Meeting. Monday, January 22

From Dan Leff:

A California discussion meeting has been scheduled for Monday, January 22,
immediately following the Executive Committee Meeting (approximately 12
p.m.).
Thank you.

Dan Leff

Rosalee - Can you please let me know if the Board Room is available for this
meeting (it's late Friday afternoon and I am unable to find out this
information).   I will call you on Monday.  Thanks for your help.

Kathy Dodgen
3-6077


As we approach the Thanksgiving Holiday, I want to take this opportunity to wish you and yours a safe and happy Holiday.
With the recent events in our nation, giving thanks this year has taken on a whole new meaning.  This Thanksgiving we honor the brave, enduring heroes who gave their lives as well as those who are abroad fighting for freedom. We can be thankful for our great nation and for the world coming together.
I recognize that here at Enron we are working through some challenging times and that everyone in the organization is working hard.  Thank you for your continued dedication.
Please take some time over the Holiday to enjoy your family and friends.
Happy Thanksgiving.
Stan


MEMORANDUM

TO: Legislative Affairs Committee
       Regulatory Affairs Committee
       Power Marketers Working Group

FROM: Scott A. Weiner, Legislative Affairs Committee Chair
            Joe Hartsoe, Regulatory Affairs Committee Chair
            Bob Reilley, Power Marketers Working Group Chair
            Eugene F. Peters, Vice President of Legislative Affairs
            Julie Simon, Vice President of Policy

DATE: March 27, 2001

RE: FERC Nominees Announced Today

The White House announced today, Pat Wood, Chairman of the Texas Public
Utility Commission and Nora Mead Brownell, Commissioner of the Pennsylvania
Public Utility Commission as FERC nominees.  Their names were sent to
Congress for confirmation to FERC.


I wish you the very best during the Holiday Season and sincerely hope you
have a wonderful time with your families.  I also wish you all a great 2001!

Best,

Ricardo

P.S. From Dec. 26 to Jan. 3rd I can be reached at my cell phone +011 (522)
560-7293 or at +011 (527) 484-1914


Jeff,

     Just wanted you to know we were thinking of you.  If you would like to
talk, give me a call at 713-869-0900 or I'll see  you on Monday night.

Mark


Hi Debra.  Here's our first kick at some amendments.  I noticed there was no
specific language regarding events of default.  I have put in a proposed
amendment for it.  Please advise if the proposed amendments work for your
company.

 <<enronnorthamericaamendments.doc>>

Once you send it back, I can route it to our legal dept for final review.

Thanks.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Debra.Perlingiere@enron.com [SMTP:Debra.Perlingiere@enron.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2000 12:49 PM
> To: jwong@bcgas.com
> Subject:
>
> James,
>
> Further to our conversation, please see the attached GISB draft for your
> review.   I understand this will be for short term deals (30 days or less)
> and delivery in the United States.
>
> (See attached file: BC  GAS  UTILITY    (GISB).doc)
>
> Regards,
> Debra Perlingiere
> Enron North America Corp.
> Legal Department
> 1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
> Houston, Texas 77002
> dperlin@enron.com
> Phone 713-853-7658
> Fax  713-646-3490 << File: BC  GAS  UTILITY    (GISB).doc >>

 - enronnorthamericaamendments.doc


Neither ENA/RAC/EGF employees nor family members or others living in their
household or financially dependent on the ENA/RAC/EGF employee may purchase
or sell securities of any entity (or derivatives thereof) listed on the
Restricted List for your or their personal or related accounts or recommend
the purchase or sale of such securities to any person, except with the prior
approval of the Compliance Department in consultation with the ENA Legal
Department.

In addition to the trading restrictions above, should you at any time possess
non-public material information about any public company, you, your family
members and anybody that is financially dependent on you, are restricted from
trading in that issue, and you may not disclose the non-public material
information to anyone that does not have a business need to know.

Company Name Stock Symbol

3 TEC Energy Corp.      TTEN
Adrian Resources
Beau Canada Exploration Ltd BAU CN
Belco Oil & Gas Corporation BOG
Bonus Resource Services Corp BOU
Brigham Exploration BEXP
CanFibre Group Ltd. CFGL
Carrizo Oil & Gas Inc. CRZO
Costilla Energy COSE
Crown Energy CROE
CyNet, Inc. CYNE
Cypress Energy CYZ
Esenjay Exploration ESNJ
Hanover Compressor Co. HC
ICE Drilling Enterprises Inc. IDF
Industrial Holdings, Inc. IHII
Inland Resources, Inc. INLN
Kafus Environmental Industries, Inc. KS
Nakornthai Strip Mill Public Co Ltd NSM SET
Paladin Resources PLC PLR LD
Paradigm Geophysical PGEOF
Place Resources, Inc. PLG CN
Quanta Services Inc. PWR
Queen Sand Resources, Inc. QSRI
Quicksilver Resources Inc. KWK
Rhythms Netconnection Inc. RTHM
Saxon Petroleum, Inc. SXN CN
Startech SEH CN
Syntroleum Corp. SYNM
Tejon Ranch Corp. TRC
Titan Exploration TEXP
TransCoastal Marine Services, Inc. TCMS
Zargon Oil & Gas ZAR CN

The Restricted List is solely for the internal use of ENA/RAC/EGF.  No one
may engage in discussions regarding whether a security is or is not on the
Restricted List with persons outside ENA/RAC/EGF without specific clearance
from the Compliance Department in consultation with the ENA Legal Department.

In addition to the above, you are reminded that pursuant to Enron Corp.'s
Risk Management Policy ("Policy"), no ENA/RAC/EGF employee may engage in the
trading of any "Position"  ("Position" means any  commodity, financial
instrument, security, equity, financial asset or liability that are
authorized for trading in the Policy for the benefit of any party other than
ENA/RAC/EGF, whether for his/her own account or the account of any third
party, where such Position relates to (i) any commodity,  financial
instrument, security, equity, financial asset or liability which falls within
such employee's responsibility at ENA/RAC/EGF or (ii) any energy commodity.

The prohibitions listed above do not replace or modify the policies set forth
in ENA's Policies and Procedures Regarding Confidential Information and
Securities Trading, Enron Corp.'s Risk Management Policy, or Enron Corp.'s
Conduct of Business Affairs.  Should you have any questions regarding the
above, please contact me at ext. 31939.


-----Original Message-----
From: fostermm [mailto:fostermm@seark.net]
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 9:30 PM
To: Davis, Dana
Subject: hello

Hello Mrs. Dana
    I know you send me a e-mail at work today but I click it off the screen where i was working and I forgot to go back after I finish and I though about it when I got home from prayer meeting.   I am at home right now and I really don't know what you was talking about on my e-mail at work but I do know Robert have not sent me a CD yet They was in Dallas this weekend at Six Flags.   Dale is in the hospital in Pine Bluff He has been up there since Thursday He had kidney problems so now he have to have dieallas/ I guest that is the way to spell it or you know what i am talking bout When I get to work in the morning that is the first thing i am going to check is my e-mail Love you Mary


Dear Barnes & Noble.com Customer:

We are excited to present you with a great reason to get your holiday
shopping done early.  You can now save $10 off any purchase of $40 or
more, but hurry because this special offer expires on Friday
November 24th.  To start saving now, click here:
http://email.bn.com/cgi-bin6/flo?y=eDCr0BMWHz0js0C2Sm

We've also added two innovative new features to our site that will
make shopping at Barnes & Noble.com easier and more convenient than
ever!

THE VISUAL SHOPPING CART
This nifty feature allows you to see all the items in your Shopping
Cart no matter where you go on our site. As soon as you add an item to
your Shopping Cart, it immediately appears in a small window on the
top left side of the page. When you move to any other page, the Visual
Shopping Cart follows you so that you can keep track of all your
purchases!

THE WISHLIST
If you,re like us, you always see interesting things in stores or
online, but you want to find out more about them before you actually
buy them. Now, you can simply add them to Barnes & Noble.com,s new
Wishlist, which keeps track of them for you for up to six months! Just
click on the link just below the &Add to Cart8 button on the
right-hand side of any item page, and you will immediately see your
updated Wishlist with that item added, along with your Shopping Cart
information. From there, you can go directly to Checkout or continue
shopping!

Try out these new services today using your $10 coupon:
http://email.bn.com/cgi-bin6/flo?y=eDCr0BMWHz0js0C2Sm

And don't forget to share the spirit of giving by forwarding this
email to your friends!

Happy Shopping,

Your Friends at Barnes & Noble.com

PLEASE NOTE:
If you do not wish to receive future e-mail updates,
please click here:
http://email.bn.com/cgi-bin6/profile?y=eDCr0BMWHz0jse


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Want to help?  Forward this e-mail to your friends, and have them
sign-up @ http://www.bushetrain.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Bush Recount News
http://www.georgewbush.com

Contents:

1    Talking Points: Summary of Florida Supreme Court Decision

2    Help the Bush Cheney Florida Recount Effort

3    Dissenting Opinion of Chief Justice Charles J. Wells

4    Statement By Secretary James Baker

5    What They're Saying...

"Well, if you're a fan of chaos, you're in Nirvana."
- John Shubin [Florida Elections Expert] MSNBC, 12/08/00

_________________________________________________________________

1
SUMMARY OF FLORIDA SUPREME COURT DECISION

~ A deeply divided Florida Supreme Court has opened up a Pandora's
  box of inconsistent standards, flawed hand counting, and delays
  that call into question Florida's ability to be represented in
  the Electoral College.

~ Further, the court's narrow, liberal majority has made a mockery
  of the idea of "counting every vote" by selecting only certain
  ballots and providing no standard to count them.  The four
  activist justices rewrote Florida's election laws after the
  election -- a clear violation of federal law.

~ Florida Supreme Court Chief Justice Wells offered a stinging and
  forceful dissent; concluding:

  ~ "The majority's decision cannot withstand the scrutiny which
    will certainly immediately follow under the United States
    Constitution"

  ~ "The majority's decision to return the case to the circuit
    court for a count of the under-votes from Miami-Dade County or
    all counties has no foundation in the law of Florida as it
    existed on November 7, 2000..."

  ~ "I have a deep and abiding concern that the prolonging of
    judicial process in this counting contest propels this country
    and this state into an unprecedented and unnecessary
    constitutional crisis.

  ~ Judge Wells said the county-by county decision-making on the
    "clear indication of the intent of the voter":  "is fraught with
    equal protection concerns which will eventually cause the
    election results in Florida to be stricken by the federal courts
    or Congress."

~ For example, in Miami-Dade County, the justices reinstated 168
  votes that were awarded to Gore as the result of manual recounts
  conducted in only some precincts - all of them overwhelmingly
  Democratic. This would be the ultimate in treating some votes
  differently from others.

~ The Court ordered a recount of all counties' undervotes, but
  there are five major problems:

  ~ First, in many counties the undervotes aren't even segregated,
    so they will have to be machine tabulated and separated. We
    know this causes chads to fall off ballots and other
    degradation of ballots.

  ~ Second, 16 counties don't even know which of their non-votes
    are undervotes and which are overvotes.

  ~ Third, even in counties that have attempted to separate the
    undervote, there are serious problems. In Miami-Dade, the
    number of undervotes submitted to the Circuit Court is
    different from the number identified in the November 8
    machine recount. There can be no confidence that the pool of
    undervotes is untainted and consistent.

  ~ Fourth, the majority accepted two different standards (the
    liberal Broward standard and the more objective Palm Beach
    standard) further proving votes are treated differently in
    each county.

  ~ Fifth, as Chief Justice Wells said, the liberal court
    majority failed "to make provision for: (1) the
    qualifications of those who count; (2) what standards are
    used in the count-are they the same standards for all
    ballots statewide or a continuation of the county-by-
    county constitutionally suspect standards; (3) who is to
    observe the count; (4) how one objects to the count; (5)
    who is entitled to object to the count; (6) whether a
    person may object to a counter; (7) the possible lack of
    personnel to conduct the count; (8) the fatigue of the
    counters; and (9) the effect of the differing intra-county
    standards.

_________________________________________________________________

2
HELP THE BUSH-CHENEY FLORIDA RECOUNT EFFORT

Want to help? Forward this e-mail to your friends.  Then, if you
have not yet given to the Bush Cheney Recount, contribute online
using our secure servers here:
https://www.econtributor.net/Contribution/Contribution.cfmAID=IVFFBXFAZHGH

AOL Users: Bush Cheney Recount

_________________________________________________________________

3
DISSENT OF CHIEF JUSTICE CHARLES J. WELLS

"I...believe that the majority's decision cannot withstand
scrutiny which will certainly immediately follow under the United
States Constitution."

Excerpt:

"I want to make it clear at the outset of my separate opinion that
I do not question the good faith or honorable intentions of my
colleagues in the majority.  However, I could not more strongly
disagree with their decision to reverse the trial court and
prolong this judicial process.  I also believe that the majority's
decision cannot withstand the scrutiny which will certainly
immediately follow under the United States Constitution.

"My succinct conclusion is that the majority's decision...has no
foundation in the law of Florida as it existed on November 7, 2000,
or at anytime until the issuance of this opinion.  The majority
returns the case to the circuit court for this partial recount of
under-votes on the basis of unknown or, at best, ambiguous
standards with authority to obtain help from others, the
credentials, qualifications, and objectivity of whom are totally
unknown.  That is but a first glance at the imponderable problems
that the majority creates.

"This case has reached the point where finality must take
precedence over continued judicial process.  I agree with a quote
from John Allen Paulos, a professor of mathematics at Temple
University, when he wrote that, "[t]he margin of error in this
election is far greater than the margin of victory, no matter who
wins."  Further judicial process will not change this self-evident
fact and will only result in confusion and disorder.  Justice
Terrell and this Court wisely counseled against such a course of
action sixty-four years ago.  I would heed that sound advice and
affirm Judge Sauls.

Full Opinion:
http://a388.g.akamai.net/f/388/21/1d/www.cnn.com/ELECTION/200/resources/fla.sc
.opin1208.pdf

_________________________________________________________________

4
STATEMENT BY FORMER SECRETARY OF STATE JAMES A. BAKER, III
December 8, 2000

Ladies and Gentlemen,

This has been a rather eventful day here in Tallahassee.  Two
Circuit Court opinions throwing out challenges to absentee ballots
in Seminole and Martin counties.  A federal judge ordering the
counting of overseas absentee ballots in many counties that were
not counted for technical reasons.  And of course, the
disappointing 4 to 3 decision of the Florida Supreme Court just
announced, which will require manually recounting tens of
thousands of non-votes and undervotes in all Florida counties that
have not yet had a manual recount - and trying to do so by
December 12.

This is what happens when for the first time in modern history, a
candidate resorts to lawsuits to try to overturn the outcome of
an election for President.  It is very sad.  For Florida, for the
nation, and for our democracy.

Today's ruling by four justices of the Florida Supreme Court is of
course a disappointment.  Its reasoning and result place the Court
once again at odds with sound judgments of Florida's lower courts,
the Florida Legislature, local election officials, and, in our
view, the US Supreme Court.  This action will unfortunately
produce ongoing uncertainty and could ultimately disenfranchise
Florida's votes in the Electoral College.

The ruling of the Florida Court's four justices is flawed in much
the same way we think as its November 21 ruling that was vacated
unanimously by the United States Supreme Court.

Let me read you what Chief Justice Wells said in part of his
dissent today:
"I...believe that the majority's decision cannot withstand the
scrutiny which will certainly immediately follow under the United
States Constitution...  [T]he majority's decision to return this
case to the circuit court for a count of the under-votes from
either Miami-Dade County or all counties has no foundation in the
law of Florida as it existed on November 7, 2000, or at any time
until the issuance of this opinion...  [T]he prolonging of
judicial process in this counting contest propels this country and
this state into an unprecedented and unnecessary constitutional
crisis.  I have to conclude that there is a real and present
likelihood that this constitutional crisis will do substantial
damage to our country, our state, and to this Court as an
institution." [pp. 41-42]

We agree with the three justices who dissented from the action of
the other four.  We believe this ruling is inconsistent with
Florida law, federal law, and the United States Constitution.
Therefore, we have no alternative other than to appeal once again
to the United States Supreme Court for relief.  We have already
put in motion the process to do so.

_________________________________________________________________

5
WHAT THEY'RE SAYING...

Judge Andrew Napolitano  [Fox News Legal Analyst]:  "...what is
this doing?  Changing the rules yet again, in the face of a federal
law that says you can't change counting procedures and rules after
six days prior to the election."
-Fox News Channel, 12/08/00

Jim Axelrod [CBS News Correspondent]: "One of the first people I
saw after the Supreme Court ruling was Dexter Douglass, a member of
the Gore legal team.  I asked him what was next.  He said, 'Chaos.'
So far, nothing's been done to help clarify the situation."
-CBS Evening News, 12/08/00

Tim Russert  [NBC News]:  "...we could have chaos and a
constitutional crisis...This is as close to a political civil war
as I've ever witnessed."
-NBC Nightly News, 12/08/00

Mike Isikoff  [Newsweek Magazine]:  "...The Republicans got a bit
of a shot in the arm.  I was just reading the dissent of Chief
Justice Wells on this case, and he is pretty stinging.  It is
surprising language from a chief justice of a state court.  He
pretty much says flatly that his colleagues were wrong as a matter
of law.  They're going to be reversed by--he predicts they will be
reversed by the U.S. Supreme Court, and also projects--talks about
a constitutional crisis that is going to flow from this.  So if
the Republicans need some leg to hang their position on, they've
got it in this dissent..."

John Gibson:  "Mike Isikoff, a crucial question is here.  What
standard is this recount going to be counted under?  Any clue?"

Mike Isikoff:  "No.  That is exactly the question that I think is
going to loom largest over the next few days."

-Fox News Channel, 12/08/00

_________________________________________________________________

Paid for by Bush-Cheney Recount
http://www.georgewbush.com
______________________________________________

If you wish to unsubscribe from the eChampion mailing list, simply click here:

http://www.clickaction.net/partner/echampions2000/unsubscribe_box.html

To become an eChampion click here:

http://www.echampions2000.com


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/02/2001
10:38 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kathie Grabstald                           04/02/2001 09:04 AM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: ENSIDE Newsletter

Good Morning!

Thank you for taking time out of a busy Friday to allow our photographer to
shoot some pictures for the ENSIDE.  I will contact you when the proofs are
ready.

I have attached the article draft with revisions by Mike, Osman and Iris.
Please peruse this draft and make any changes or corrections. I need it back
for the layout team by Wednesday evening, April 4, if possible.

Regards,
Kathie Grabstald
EWS Public Relations


The major groups are :

Manage Risk
Deal Clearing & Documentation
Logistics
Volume Management
Client Services or Settlements
Global Data Management

Within each of these major areas there groups of activities.  I have some
charts I can provide to you (they are slightly dated, but still better than
not).  To give you an idea,

Manage Risk is comprised of :  Value books, Identify Limit violations, Flash
P&L, Trade Capture, Generate Reports, etc.
Deal Clearing is comprised of: Prepare and distribute confirmations,
verify/audit deals, broker checkout, etc.
Logistics is comprised of:  gather operational data, communicate with
pipelines, plan product movement, nominate product movement, balance
positions, etc.
Volume Management : validate transport statements, allocate volumes,
reconcile imbalances, etc.
Client Services - Prepare and generate invoices, generate payment requests,
resolve disputes on billing, cash management, reconcile A/R and A/P, etc
Global Data Management - set up new counterparties, maintain cp data, capture
and validate settled prices, setup new pipelines and facilities, etc.

Generally, what is thought of as Financial Reporting at Enron is outside of
Back Office Operations as is any trading or origination activity.

Sally/Bob - feel free to make any corrections/additions you see fit.

Lisa Petruszka@ENRON
02/01/2001 10:47 AM
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Solmonson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob M
Hall/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Back Office Process Definitions

Hello team  -

How does Enron define their back office processes?  It seems that every
organization has their own definition of "back office" and the processes that
fall within it.  So, I was curious to know if we had a consistent breakdown
for Enron.  What I'm wondering is if there is a "common language" across
Enron.

Let me explain where I'm going with this question - I know that there will be
participants from many parts of Enron at the session so we might have a risk
of different definitions or assumptions being used during the conversations.
If the groups define processes differently, even slightly,  there could be
some confusion if we start a conversation at the session around the kinds of
services to be offered.

To give you an idea of what I've seen, here are some different breakdowns or
"models" used:

In Derivatives Strategy magazine's annual technology assessment, the
following breakdown is used to evaluate software products:
Deal Capture
Special Deal Entry
EOD Mark to Market
P/L Calculations
Settlement
Confirmations
Payments
Payment Netting

The Bloomberg model, as depicted in Wall Street & Technology, January 2001,
has the following high-level components:
Trade and Order Management
Electronic Trade Confirmation
Trade Allocation
Settlement Instructions
Electronic Settlement Links

Let me know your thoughts on this.  If you think there is a significant risk
of different groups using different definitions for Enron we might be able to
build in an exercise early on to get us over the hurdle.

Lisa P
5-6352


Dan,
Haldor Topsoe has requested a maximum volume of 1600 mmbtu per day and the
new deal will replace the old deal at a new price of 110% IF-HSC for total
requirements with an end date of 8/31/2004.
FYI we are putting about $120,000 of facilities in to this location and it
will have a new meter roughly 800 feet from the old one.  I am not sure at
this time if we will read both meters or just one.

Dan J Hyvl
04/25/2001 10:29 AM
To: Darren Vanek/ENRON@enronXgate@ENRON
cc: Gary W Lamphier/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: RE: Haldor Topsoe

Note that the previous contract is terminated 8/31/02 in the new agreement
and the new confirm is attached at the end of the new agreement.  Any
comments???

	Darren Vanek/ENRON@enronXgate
	04/24/2001 03:02 PM

		 To: Gary W Lamphier/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: RE: Haldor Topsoe

Please allow me to review the terms of the Master before we send the draft.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Lamphier, Gary
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 2:53 PM
To: Vanek, Darren
Cc: Hyvl, Dan
Subject: RE: Haldor Topsoe

Darren,
Haldor Topsoe has agreed to terms of 110% of IF-HSC through August 31, 2004.
I will have legal prepare the Master physical and the confirmation.

From: Darren Vanek/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/17/2001 11:59 AM
To: Gary W Lamphier/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE: Haldor Topsoe

As long as we have the Master executed, you can do the extension.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Lamphier, Gary
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 11:19 AM
To: Vanek, Darren
Subject: RE: Haldor Topsoe

I understand the physical agreement is a must.  However, my real question is
regarding a two year extension.

From: Darren Vanek/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/17/2001 09:39 AM
To: Gary W Lamphier/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE: Haldor Topsoe

Gary the ONLY way that we can do these deals is AFTER the signing of the
Master Physical Agreement.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Lamphier, Gary
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2001 7:00 PM
To: Vanek, Darren
Cc: Lamphier, Gary
Subject: Haldor Topsoe

Darren,
I am going to send three options to Haldor Topsoe to choose from; all three
will require a master physical:
 1) Leave current deal at 125% Index and add 1200 mmbtu/d new volumes through
8/31/2002 @ 115% Index
 2) Price existing deal and new volumes through 8/31/2002 @ 120% Index
 3)  Show a variety of floors and collars to reduce the index percentage
through 8/31/2002 for all volumes.
I believe I have approval for these three options.  MTM value for all options
should calculate to be around $230,000.

However, now is an outstanding time to increase the value to Enron by
extending this deal another two years and hence doubling the MTM value.  They
will not transact at  these levels two years from now without us having to
put facilities in the ground.  Please consider a two year extension or tell
me what requirements would have to be met to do this.

Thanks,

Gary

From: Darren Vanek/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/16/2001 04:36 PM
To: Gary W Lamphier/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jason R Williams/ENRON@enronXgate
Subject: RE: JER/BRE Austin Tech

Gary,
 As I stated before, I will forward a new worksheet to Dan Hyvl for JER/BRE,
but we are NOT to enter into another transaction until the document is
executed. Seeing as JER wanted to fix a price this week, I think that it will
be difficult to get this deal completed. Please follow up with Wayne at JER.
 In addition, I am forwading a worksheet for Haldor Topsoe as well. We can
NOT enter into the new transaction with additional volumes with them until
their master is signed as well.

If you have any questions please call.

-Darren

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Lamphier, Gary
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2001 4:21 PM
To: Vanek, Darren
Subject: Re: JER/BRE Austin Tech

---------------------- Forwarded by Gary W Lamphier/HOU/ECT on 04/16/2001
04:20 PM ---------------------------

 << OLE Object: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) >>   From:  Russell
Diamond
01/10/2001 11:08 AM

To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Gary W Lamphier/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: JER/BRE Austin Tech

Dan,

See attached.

 << File: JER-BRE Austin Tech.xls >>
---------------------- Forwarded by Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT on 01/10/2001
11:03 AM ---------------------------

 << OLE Object: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) >>   From:  Russell
Diamond
01/10/2001 10:32 AM

To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Gary W Lamphier/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: JER/BRE Austin Tech   << OLE Object: StdOleLink >>

Hey Dan, Gary,

Gary entered into this transation to sell this counterparty 1,000 mmbtu/d at
an Index related price with a Put option of $3.50 and a premium of 0.095.  As
I understand it, Gary will never be buying gas from his counterparty and this
is the only transaction he plans on doing with the counterparty.  If this is
the case, I would think only a Master Sales agreement would be needed instead
of a Master Purchase Sale Agreement and thus a Credit Worksheet is not
needed. Please let me know if this is not the case.

Thanks
Russell

 << OLE Object: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) >> 	Enron North America
Corp.  From:  Gary W Lamphier                           01/09/2001 01:51 PM

To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT, Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: JER/BRE Austin Tech   << OLE Object: StdOleLink >>

Russell,
Please let Dan know you have approved this deal.

 << OLE Object: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) >>
Dan J Hyvl
01/09/2001 11:37 AM
To: Gary W Lamphier/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: JER/BRE Austin Tech   << OLE Object: StdOleLink >>

Gary,
 Credit has a hold on this deal.  As you are aware, we need a credit
worksheet before we can generate the proposed contract.  If you can get
Russell Diamond to issue a credit worksheet to me, I will be glad to start
work on the request.

	Gary W Lamphier 01/09/2001 11:13 AM 	   To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT  cc:
Subject: JER/BRE Austin Tech

Dan,
Did we ever send a contract out ot these guys?  I know we discussed it but I
bet I never requested a contract.  Let me know.


Return-Path: <gordahlers@msn.com>
Received: from  rly-ye04.mx.aol.com (rly-ye04.mail.aol.com [172.18.151.201]) by air-ye01.mail.aol.com (vx) with ESMTP id MAILINYE14-0926135311; Wed, 26 Sep 2001 13:53:11 -0400
Received: from  hotmail.com (oe137.pav0.hotmail.com [64.4.33.130]) by rly-ye04.mx.aol.com (v80.21) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINYE45-0926135239; Wed, 26 Sep 2001 13:52:39 -0400
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC;	 Wed, 26 Sep 2001 10:52:38 -0700
X-Originating-IP: [209.180.10.179]
From: "DAWN AHLERS" <gordahlers@msn.com>
To: "Beth A. Berg" <bethannberg@juno.com>, "Betty Smart" <Netgranny@msn.com>,        "Debbie and Bruce Hoppe" <DebbieHoppe@hotmail.com>,        "Diana Prince" <dlprince@uswest.net>,        "Diane Ahlers" <dahlers@hotmail.com>,        "Jeanine and Paul Huot" <jeanine@huot.com>,        "Steve and Lenora Gerrish" <MNORAG@aol.com>,        "lizabee81_hotmail_com" <lizabee81@hotmail.com>,        "Lois Hughes" <LMH2910591@aol.com>,        "Mark Sauerbrey" <mark.w.sauerbrey@xcelenergy.com>,        "Mary Ann and Dean Loucks" <ddmaloucks@WCTel.net>,        "MaryLou and Bob Gerrish" <Robary@cs.com>,        "Kathy and Bill Sauerbrey" <Katbill59@cs.com>,        "Patty and Willy Paulson" <pattywilly@cs.com>,        "Sue Nygaard" <Nygaard1212@aol.com>
Subject: Fw: WHAT POWER!!!!!!!
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 12:59:34 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MSN Explorer 6.10.0016.1624
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_001_0000_01C1468B.16F5F1E0"
Message-ID: <OE137D3MBhe3WYIgoFT0000ec45@hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Sep 2001 17:52:38.0598 (UTC) FILETIME=[08097660:01C146B4]

----- Original Message -----
From: LAMM.GAY@luthbro.com
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 7:58 AM
To: johnsonsyx@aol.com; scwegwerth@juno.com; ltaube@pearlbaths.com; jkgilstad@aol.com; crossfiles@juno.com; jlamm812@msn.com; Jeanne.R.Fischer@WellsFargo.COM; jdcampbell3@juno.com; STANGEE@tuhs.temple.edu; galout@aol.com; lammden@chrobinson.com; afmaser@usfamily.net; alice-graf@home.com; gordahlers@msn.com; ESPERUM.BRENDA@luthbro.com; KUEHN.LYNDA@luthbro.com
Subject: WHAT POWER!!!!!!!

  God's Wings
  An  article in National Geographic several years ago provided a penetrating
  picture  of God's wings.  After a forest fire in Yellowstone National Park,
  forest  rangers  began  their  trek  up  a mountain to assess the inferno's
  damage.
  One   ranger   found   a  bird  literally  petrified  in  ashes, perched
  statuesquely  on the ground at the base of a tree. Somewhat sickened by the
  eerie  sight, he knocked over the bird with a stick.  When he gently struck
  it,  three  tiny chicks scurried from under their dead mother's wings. The
  loving  mother,  keenly  aware  of  impending  disaster,  had carried her
  offspring  to  the  base of the tree and had gathered them under her wings,
  instinctively knowing that the toxic smoke would rise. She could have flown
  to  safety  but  had  refused  to  abandon  her babies.  Then the blaze had
  arrived  and  the heat had scorched her small body, the mother had remained
  steadfast.   Because  she had been willing to die, those under the cover of
  her  wings would live.  "He will cover you with his feathers, and under his
  wings you will find refuge." (Psalm 91:4)
  Being  loved  this  much should make a difference in your life. Remember
  the  One  who  loves you, and then be different because of it. Please pass
  this  on to others you care about and don't drive faster than your Guardian
  Angel  can  fly.  My instructions were to send this to people that I wanted
  God  to  bless and I picked you.  Please pass this on to people you want to
  be blessed.


Ina,

Can you please forward the presentation to Mog.

Phillip
---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT on 04/18/2001
02:50 PM ---------------------------
From: Karen Buckley/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/18/2001 10:56 AM CDT
To: Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE: Presentation to Trading Track A&A

Hi Philip

If you do have slides preapred,, can you have your assistant e:mail a copy to
Mog Heu, who will conference in from New York.

Thanks, karen

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Allen, Phillip
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 10:30 AM
To: Buckley, Karen
Subject: Re: Presentation to Trading Track A&A

The topic will the the western natural gas market.  I may have overhead
slides.  I will bring handouts.


Works for me.

Susan

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shackleton, Sara
Sent:	Friday, February 01, 2002 12:56 PM
To:	Musch, Susan; George, Robert H.
Subject:	RE: RMT

let me know if 3:30 works for you guys; we can meet in 3801a (my office).

thanks.  Sara

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Musch, Susan
Sent:	Friday, February 01, 2002 10:29 AM
To:	Shackleton, Sara
Subject:	RMT

Sara,

When you like to meet on RMT today?  My morning is booked up, but the afternoon is pretty open.

Best regards,
Susan


Mark,
You approved a script for an interactive cd a month or so ago.  There is
going to be a section called "Try A Trade," which is a trade simulator.  Do
you have a preferred disclaimer regarding the fact that all of these trades
are simulated?

Please give me a call if you have questions,'

-Dan
x39673


5 bedrooms for a millsky?

To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re:

great man...we just lifted a new pad too this past weekend...Bunker Hill
area...sweet

fletch


??????? Please find attached a marked copy of the Enron/Citibank Fiscal
AgencyAgreement.? Please ignore the marked copy of the Fiscal Agency
Agreement that was part of the last distribution as it was a reversed
blackline of the document.? We apologize for any inconenience this may have
caused.

 <<Enron-Citi FAA - Compare.rtf>>

Michael B. Dunn, Esq.

Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP

1 Chase Manhattan Plaza

New York, NY? 10005

Telephone: (212) 530-5435

Facsimile: (212) 530-5014

E-Mail: mdunn1@milbank.com

This e-mail message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee
or agent responsible for delivery of this message to the intended
recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail message is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify
the sender and delete this e-mail message from your computer.

 - Enron-Citi FAA - Compare.rtf


you know that there is a cabos off of shepherd and 59 dont you?

To: Timothy Blanchard/HOU/EES@EES, Bryan Hull/HOU/ECT@ECT, Luis
Mena/NA/Enron@Enron, Lisa Gillette/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Shanna Husser/HOU/EES@EES, Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT, mmmarcantel@equiva.com
cc:
Subject:

does everyone want to meet at tortucas on kirby south of 59 or el tiempo(no
tequilla shots) or cabos downtown tonight.  let's meet around 6-6:30.


---------------------- Forwarded by Hector McLoughlin/Corp/Enron on
01/29/2001 09:41 AM ---------------------------

 (Embedded
 image moved
 to file:      From:  Norma Yeverino
 pic18467.pcx) 01/26/2001 09:15 PM

To:   Gary Buck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amanda Curless/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ben
      Herman/NA/Enron@ENRON, Philip Conn/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ryan
      Seleznov/Corp/Enron@Enron, Hector McLoughlin/Corp/Enron@Enron,
      Francisco deJesus/NA/Enron@ENRON, Cecilia Hankamer/Corp/Enron@Enron,
      Grace Garcia/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Janet De La Paz/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:   Robert Jones/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject:  Revised Promotion Announcement

 (Embedded
 image moved   (Embedded image moved to file: pic26500.pcx)
 to file:
 pic06334.pcx)

Attached is the promotions announcement that will be distributed to all
Enron Net Work employees.  Robert would like everyone's sign - off on the
announcement before it is distributed.  To ensure accuracy, please review
and let me know if there are any changes before the distribution.

Thanks,
Norma

(See attached file: ENW Promotions Announcemt.doc)

 - pic18467.pcx
 - pic06334.pcx
 - pic26500.pcx
 - ENW Promotions Announcemt.doc


--____________________________Next
Content-Type: text/plain

============================================
A SPECIAL OFFER
brought to you by CBS SportsLine.com
============================================
**********************************************************************
Win $1,000,000! at Megasports.com!
Let's Jam Sucka!
http://ww1.sportsline.com/links/click.cgi?8&1&2804701&/links/6/1/110/MegaHdr122801.cgi

Play Megasports.com's Daily Pick 4 Contest!
Pick 4 answers. WIN $60,000 A MONTH!
http://ww1.sportsline.com/links/click.cgi?8&1&2804701&/links/6/1/110/ExclPick4Left122801.cgi
**********************************************************************

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
We give Away $2,000 Every Day
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Every day a new contest, every day you have a chance to win at least $2,000
by making just four simple picks. What are you waiting for?
Click here and start winning now:
http://ww1.sportsline.com/links/click.cgi?8&1&2804701&/links/6/1/110/ExclStartWinning122801.cgi

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Real Winners, Real People
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Every Single day, at Megasports.com, at least one of our users gets richer.
Click here to see our winners, and hear their stories:
http://ww1.sportsline.com/links/click.cgi?8&1&2804701&/links/6/1/110/ExclClicktoseeWinners122801.cgi

~~~~~~~~~
Win a Million
~~~~~~~~~
20 questions, 20 answers, one million dollars. Our first and still one of our
most popular contests. Running during the week, test out your football
knowledge and get rich. Click here to enter now:
http://ww1.sportsline.com/links/click.cgi?8&1&2804701&/links/6/1/110/ExclEnterNow122801.cgi

SOUND TOO GOOD TO BE TRUE?
Come to Megasports.com and find out!
http://ww1.sportsline.com/links/click.cgi?8&1&2804701&/links/6/1/110/ExclCometoMega122801.cgi

**********************************************************************
You received this e-mail because you registered on CBS SportsLine.com.
If you do not want to receive these special e-mail offers you can unsubscribe
by clicking this link:
http://ww1.sportsline.com/links/click.cgi?8&1&2804701&/u/newsletters/newsletter.cgi?email=plove@enron.com.
You are subscribed as [{(plove@enron.com)}] .

Although we are sending this e-mail to you, SportsLine.com is not
responsible for the advertisers' content and makes no warranties or
guarantees about the products or services advertised. SportsLine.com
takes your privacy seriously. To learn more about SportsLine.com's use
of personal information, please read our Privacy Statement at http://ww1.sportsline.com/links/click.cgi?8&1&2804701&/u/userservices/privacy.htm
**********************************************************************

--____________________________Next
Content-Type: text/html

<TITLE>MegaSports</TITLE>

We give Away $2,000 Every Day

Every day a new contest, every day you have a chance to win at least $2,000 by making just four simple picks.   What are you waiting for?

 Click here and start winning now.

Real Winners, Real People

Every Single day, at megasports.com, at least one of our users gets richer. Click here to see our winners, and hear their stories.

Win a Million

20 questions, 20 answers, one million dollars.  Our first and still one of our most popular contests.  Running during the week, test out your football knowledge and get rich.

Click here to enter now.

SOUND TOO GOOD TO BE TRUE?

Come to Megasports.com and find out!

You received this e-mail because you registered on CBS SportsLine.com. If you do not want to receive these special e-mail offers you can unsubscribe by clicking this link: http://www.sportsline.com/u/newsletters/newsletter.cgi?email=plove@enron.com. You are subscribed as [{(plove@enron.com)}] .

Although we are sending this e-mail to you, SportsLine.com is not responsible for the advertisers' content and makes no warranties or guarantees about the products or services advertised. SportsLine.com takes your privacy seriously. To learn more about SportsLine.com's use of personal information, please read our Privacy Statement at http://cbs.sportsline.com/u/userservices/privacy.htm

--____________________________Next--


FYI-

  As of June 2001, Portland General Electric's Enpower name has been changed from PORTLAND to PORTLANDGE.
  You can pull CARPs for both counterparties, but if you enter deals, only PORTLANDGE is active.
  This will make a difference for anyone true-ing up months prior to June 1, 2001 by entering the deals into the system after June 1, 2001, as the information will fall under 2 counterparties and will have to be merged in Excel.

  Please ask me if you have any questions.

  Thanks,

  Virginia


IMPORTANT NOTICE
UNDERSCHEDULING PENALTY AND
PG&E BANKRUPTCY PROOF OF CLAIMS
As you are aware, the claims bar date in the PG&E bankruptcy is September
5th.  Consistent with our practice of providing information held by the ISO
to Market Participants that concerns the amounts that may be owed to them in
part by PG&E, the ISO is today sending to each Scheduling Coordinator an
accounting of the amounts it owes or is owed in the event the
underscheduling penalty is not modified by FERC.  FERC adopted the
underscheduling penalty in a December 15, 2000 Order.  Because there are
several rehearing petitions pending regarding the underscheduling penalty,
to date the ISO has calculated but has not invoiced amounts owed or owing
pursuant to the underscheduling penalty.  It is our expectation that
Scheduling Coordinators will share with individual entities for whom they
schedule, information that is relevant to them.
As we have advised in prior Market Notices, although the ISO settles
transactions on behalf of Market Participants, the ISO is neither authorized
nor in a position unilaterally to assert claims on behalf of Market
Participants in any bankruptcy proceeding, i.e. assert claims of "ISO
Debtors" against "ISO Creditors" (ISO Tariff Section 11.20.1).  Further,
while the ISO may be asked by an "ISO Debtor" to assert such claims in the
PX or PG&E bankruptcy cases, the ISO is not obliged to do so and will
decline any such request.  The ISO expressly disavows any liability for any
Market Participant's claims, whether or not the Market Participant files any
such proofs of claim in the PX or PG&E bankruptcy proceedings.
Further, as we have advised in prior Market Notices, all statements,
including the information sent today regarding the underscheduling penalty,
are subject to change.  A number of transactions are currently known to be
the subject of disputes and market reruns.  There are also proceedings
pending at FERC, Federal Courts, and State Courts, the outcomes of which may
affect amounts owed by PG&E to each Market Participant or by the Market
Participant to PG&E. In addition, we anticipate that further disputes and
proceedings may arise and market reruns may be performed that will affect
the calculation of such amounts.  The ISO will continue to work diligently
to resolve these matters as quickly as possible.  Nonetheless, it is clear
that significant issues may remain unresolved and/or unidentified by the
claims bar date.
Market Participants should consult their own legal COUNSEL as to their
respective rights  and proofs of claims in the bankruptcy cases of the PX
and PG&E.
Client Relations Communications
CRCommunications@caiso.com <mailto:CRCommunications@caiso.com>


As you are aware, we are starting to collect data for our February price
model. I've attached a survey to help us collect the data that will be
driving your costs from the activities to the commercial teams.  Please
select your RCs, and fill in the driver quantity for the requested driver for
the month of February. Please fill out the attached activity driver survey
with February numbers for your RC by end of day Friday, March 3rd.  If your
group currently generates a standard report that captures the surveyed data,
please send the report to me, and put me on your recipient list beginning
next month.  This will eliminate your need to fill out this survey every
month.  If you would like us to collect this information from someone within
your team beginning next month, please let me know.

Please take this opportunity to verify the following:
1. The driver indicates a measure for the time and effort your team spent to
perform these activities for each commercial team.
2. The activity is spent in support of the commercial teams identified
(please let us know otherwise)
3. If the activity is using an allocation (for example "Allocate 0469" or
"80-20 Split"), that the percentage allocated to each commercial team has not
changed from last month.   (Please let us know if it has changed what the new
allocation is).

In reference to these surveys, please note:
If you are allocating only infrastructure costs to some commercial teams
listed in the survey, please identify them.  We will take your business
support costs (such as feedback, training, etc.) and allocate them evenly
among these teams.
The costs for "commercial team specific" activities that you filled time out
for in the January time survey will be directly allocated to that commercial
team (e.g. Genco Support will trace 100% of its costs to Genco).

Please let us know if you have any questions on this survey.

Regards,
Shari
3-3859


this has been changed.

	From:  Sharen Cason                           02/14/2001 02:20 PM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Kimberly Hundl/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: #523070

This deal has an SP delivery point with firm energy.

Thanks!


(See attached file: HPLN1111.xls)

 - HPLN1111.xls


Vince,

Durasoft (who just taught the Java class for our group) offers a 3-day short
course in Java for managers.   Details are below, if you are interested.

--Stinson

---------------------- Forwarded by Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT on 04/16/2001
12:16 PM ---------------------------

"Siva Thiagarajan" <siva@durasoftcorp.com> on 04/16/2001 11:25:50 AM
Please respond to "Siva Thiagarajan" <siva@durasoftcorp.com>
To: <Stinson.Gibner@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Java for Managers!!!

Hi Stinson,
?
Thanks for meeting with us on  Thursday.? We enjoyed
talking with you.
?
As per our discussion, I have attached  the course
outline of Java for Managers along with this  email.
After our conversation with you we think this  course
may be a  little bit heavy for your group.? But we can definetly
take it down to concepts level and make it  appropriate for
our audience.? Please review and let me know,  if this
course would be of value to you.? This is a 3 day course
and costs $11,000 (maximum of 15  students).
?
Regards,
?
- Siva
 - OOJavaForManagers.doc


here is Jennifer's message ....
Sheri
---------------------- Forwarded by Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT on 09/12/2000 10:14
AM ---------------------------

From:  Jennifer deBoisblanc Denny
                08/15/2000 02:43 PM

To: Beth Perlman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  (bcc: Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT)
Subject: Bridge Problems

Beth,
I know you are at the VP level but I thought I would forward you the memo
below.
I wrote it to explain to the EnronOnline Call Center the various issues we
have been having with the "bridge" since they get a vast
number of internal calls when we have a problem.

Please let me know if you have any questions or if I should be funneling
these concerns to a particular person.
Thanks.
Jennifer
3-5824

---------------------- Forwarded by Jennifer deBoisblanc Denny/HOU/ECT on
08/15/2000 02:31 PM ---------------------------

From:  Jennifer deBoisblanc Denny
                08/10/2000 05:22 PM

To: EOL Call Center
cc: Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Torrey
Moorer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tara Sweitzer/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Bridge Problems

Over the last 8-10 business days, we have had a some issues on the bridges. I
want to educate you a little bit on what can cause
"bridge problems".

First, what I want to explain is their is ONE GUI bridge application for
users (backoffice users) to monitor the bridge but there are MULTIPLE
systems that EnronOnline transactions can be pointed to downstream. This is
important to understand because if you do not know this ,
it may seem like we are having the same problem over & over; ie "the bridge
is having problems". But in actuality, it is DIFFERENT
problems. Still not good - but at least it cannot be isolated to ONE
problem.

Also, due to multiple systems (Sitara, Enpower, GasDesk, Tagg/ERMS,
Powerdesk) are listening for messages from one EnronOnline,
a "bridge" problem could be one of many issues. Some of which are:

 The server for EnronOnline  messenger goes down (doesn't send message to
bridge to process)
 The Enron network goes down (cannot send message thru bridge)
 The NFS server (Enron main server) goes down
 Sitara server goes down
 Enpower server goes down
 Tagg/ERMS server goes down
 Deal worker in ANY system gets "hung up"
 Huge volume slows down processing time for one or more downstream systems
 Scheduled outage for maintenance on server on weekend was not re-started on
Sunday

and the list goes on.....................................

FYI In the past week & 1/2, the following actions happened, which caused
"bridge" problems.

 Scheduled outage for maintenance on TAGG/erms server on weekend was not
re-started on Sunday (not smart)
 The NFS server (Enron main server) goes down (affected Sitara & Tagg/ERMS)
 Deal worker in Sitara system got "hung up" and servers had to be bounced
 Member of EnronOnline Dev Team changed data for specific tokenised periods
during trading hours instead of end of day
  (This failed deals in bridge for Sitara & Tagg/ERMS)

One thing to remember is you are getting calls from traders & back office.
Traders are calling because they cannot see deals in their
position manager application of their system. If they are gas traders, if
could be Sitara or Tagg system. If they are a power trader
calling, they cannot see it in Enpower. ecetera, ecetera

If a back office person calls, they are watching the monitor GUI and they can
see deals queing/backing up and know there is a problem.

We are working to resolve some of these issues, particularily,
multi-processing tools, as we know the # of transactions will only increase.
Please feel free to email me if you have any questions. I hope this was
helpful.

See below for explanation of problem on Wednesday.

---------------------- Forwarded by Jennifer deBoisblanc Denny/HOU/ECT on
08/09/2000 03:50 PM ---------------------------

KARIE HASTINGS
08/09/2000 02:06 PM
To: Jennifer deBoisblanc Denny/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mark Kinkead/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Mills/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas
Engel/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Sitara Production Problem

I am forwarding a message that explains the Sitara Production problems from
this morning. Please let me know if you have any additional questions.

Karie (36759)

At  9:50am this morning a DealWorker process in the Sitara system became
unresponsive.
At  10:00 am it was determined that the EOLBridge in sitara was not
processing new deal requests
and diagnostics lead to an indication that the dealworker was not functioning
properly.
At 10:14, am the Dealworker was forced down and a new one restarted.
At 10:21 am , the EOLBridge began processing deals.

The cause of the is difficult to determine, but indicators point to an error
in the CORBA product we are using,
most likely due to scalability issues of that product and of Sitara. This is
an issue that is actively being addressed.

--Mark Kinkead
3-1961