I can come pick you up at around 1:00.  Do you need to be there an 1 1/2
early?  Call me to confirm.  I am not that busy today, and I have my car
already down here.  Plus, I want to say goodbye.

Laurel

-----Original Message-----
From: Smith, Matt [mailto:Matt.Smith@ENRON.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 9:59 AM
To: Laurel Hazzard
Subject: RE:

I'm on the 3 pm flight today.  If you wanted to take me, I wouldn't say
no, but, as always, don't feel like you have to...

Mat

-----Original Message-----
From: Laurel Hazzard [mailto:lhazzard@firstam.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 9:50 AM
To: Smith, Matt
Subject:

Have you scheduled a flight?  Let me know what time.  I can probably
drive
you to the airport on my lunch.

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Updated as requested. Thanks


I recently won two of your auctions. One is 5 posters, one is 18. I am excited
about these posters, but I have a couple questions. Are the 5 posters in the first
set completely included in the set of 18? If so, is it possible to get any non-duplicates
that you may own in the same theme that will not be doubled up in these sets?

Thanks for the product.
Jason


From Keith Larney:

Please find attached the Board Presentation Package regarding the Eagle
transaction to be discussed at the meeting tomorrow.  Please do not
hesitate to call Keith at 469-357-4497 if you have any questions or
comments.  Thank you.
____________________

Shea Dugger
Legal Dept.
Tel: 469-357-4195
Fax: 469-357-6566
shea_dugger@i2.com
----- Forwarded by Shea Dugger/Dallas/US/i2Tech on 12/06/00 01:23 PM -----

(See attached file: Eagle BOD Presentation 12-07-00 v4-1.zip)

 - Eagle BOD Presentation 12-07-00 v4-1.zip


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Deming, Richard
Sent:	Friday, October 12, 2001 3:17 PM
To:	Storey, Geoff
Cc:	Wallumrod, Ellen
Subject:	FW: Petro-Canada Hydrocarbons Inc.

Geoff-
Just wondering if you had a chance to review the below e-mail.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Deming, Richard
Sent:	Thursday, October 11, 2001 3:32 PM
To:	Storey, Geoff
Cc:	Wallumrod, Ellen
Subject:	Petro-Canada Hydrocarbons Inc.

Geoff-
I am sending three confirms for you to view, however, the comments on these deals are switchable rights / we can point transport to secondary delivery.  I am unclear what you are trying to do, please pick one of the selections below to go in the confirms that stats what you are trying to say.  Also, what is the secondary delivery point.

1.  Buyer has the option to take gas at either Delivery Point upon proper notice to Seller prior to the pipeline nomination deadline for any Period of Delivery.

2.  Prior to the pipeline nomination deadline, either party may select a secondary Delivery Point from among (list point(s)) or any other mutually agreeable point.

	3.  Buyer, at its option and upon proper notice to Seller prior to the pipeline nomination deadline, shall have the 	right to change Delivery Points up to ??? times during the Period of Delivery

Thanks
Richard
x54886


FYI

Vince

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Webb, Jay
Sent:	Friday, August 31, 2001 2:06 PM
To:	Kaminski, Vince J
Subject:	RE: EOL Data Mining

Hi Vince.

We will help any way we can.

Thanks!
 --jay

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kaminski, Vince J
Sent:	Friday, August 31, 2001 11:04 AM
To:	Webb, Jay
Cc:	Lu, Zimin; Kaminski, Vince J; Lee, Bob; Crenshaw, Shirley
Subject:	EOL Data Mining

Jay,

I have to add another item to a long list of your headaches.

Greg Whalley gave us marching orders to treat the development of quantitative
models for data mining of EOL trade records as the top priority.
I shall be providing Greg bi-weekly updates on the project.

FYI only. I am flying with Greg next week to a meeting with a third party
that may be involved in some aspects of this project. I shall tell you more when
we meet.

I know that we, as well as Greg, can count on full support and cooperation from you.

I shall ask my assistant, Shirley Crenshaw, to set up a meeting with you next week after I come back from
the trip.

Vince


I am.  He's just not madly in love with me.

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark.Guzman@enron.com [mailto:Mark.Guzman@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 9:01 AM
To: Katie.Trullinger@wfsg.com
Subject: RE: FW: hi!

Yeah I guess that makes sense.  I thought you were madly in love with this
cat.


I know there is lots going on but I would like to resign from the Board of Mariner asap. I am having trouble devoting enough time to this function and feel it would be better if I turned it over to someone else. Dave Gorte in my group would be my recommendation as a replacement. If Dave does not have an interest, Brad Larson could also fill in. Any thoughts? If you have no issues I will proceed. Thanks, Rick


Today's figures are as follows:

	Transactions		=	5,866
	Counterparties		=	302
	# of Users Transacting	=	1,156

This compares to 5,405 on October 2, which was a Tuesday.  All expected counterparties were transacting at normal levels.

Eric


---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Neal/HOU/ECT on 10/20/2000 09:06 AM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  The Pulse @ ENRON                           10/19/2000 08:26 PM

Sent by: Enron Announcements@ENRON
To: The Pulse mailout
cc:
Subject: IMPORTANT MESSAGE FROM OFFICE OF THE CHAIRMAN

Is available: through Friday, Oct. 27
Is located at: survey.enron.com

You only have one more week to check your pulse.  Your input is crucial, so
please take a few minutes today to fill out Enron's annual employee feedback
survey.  It is confidential and only takes about 10 minutes.  Give us your
honest, candid feedback ) we need to know what you think and how you feel
about your job and about Enron.

It's important for you to know that we will respond actively to your
comments.  We need your help not only to pinpoint and diagnose any existing
problems, but also to help us identify the best solutions.  Last year we
formed action teams to address the issues that you indicated in the survey,
so let us know if they have helped make Enron a better place to work.

Again, please stop what you're doing for just a few minutes today and check
your pulse.


Who is playing on Sunday besides me!


Jinbaek,

The answer to the 1st question is yes.
The project list is fine with me and is still valid. We are an organization
driven by the needs of our internal customers.

I shall froward your message to the  person in EBS.
Hopefully, we shall get a positive response.

Vince

Jinbaek Kim <jinbaek@ieor.berkeley.edu> on 03/15/2001 01:12:32 AM
To: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Summer internship

Dr. Kaminski,

Sorry for the late response,
it took me some time to coordinate things.
Finally, it's almost dont :-)
It turned out that from June to August
will be best for me for work at ENRON
(Say June.4 to August.4)

But I still need to know several things from your side.
Could you answer following questions?

First:
Is my suggested working period is OK with you?
If so, let me know what to do for settlement
during the period.

Second:
I got a list of work, I might be able to do for
DealBench team from Ross and Suresh.
I'd like to know it is still a valid work list:
The list he sent is as following:

> 1.  Write a paper in layman's terms that answers
> questions like the following:
> Benefits of auctioning online for both buyers and
> sellers, particularly in reverse auctions
> Explanation how multi-variable auctions are not
> as efficient as price-only auctions (is this true?)
> How many participants are recommended for a
> successful live auction
> What types of goods and services are best suited
> for live auctions versus sealed bid quotes
> Opinions on lotting strategies
> Trends in online private auctions

> 2.  Identify appropriate recent auction research (3
> or 4 papers out of the 90+ you provided)and obtain approvals from the
> authors to post on our site

> 3. Create a list/bibiliography of relevant auction
> literature (with hyperlinks?)

> 4.  Would you be willing to offer auction consulting
> services to our customers (if they are interested)

Third:
There is an e-procurement forum at Haas School of business,
in May 22. The chair of the forum is my advisor Prof. Arie Segev.
A person from Wells Fargo Bank will talk about Wells Fargo's role
in e-marketplace payment initiative,
where ENRON broadband services is also one of key players
along with Citibank.
He asked me whether you can contact a person at
ENRON broadband services, who's related to the initiative.
He wants to know whether we will have a speaker from ENRON
to see ENRON's perspective, in the Forum.

Here is a link to news related to the initiative,

http://www.internetweek.com/story/INW20000808S0001

Fourth:
My advisor wants to know whether
there could be any opportunity to do a case study,
regarding ENRON's business.
He is interested in e-procurement and e-marketplaces.
Business model and System architecture...

Thanks for reading this long email.
I'll look forward to your answer..
I am sorry for giving you so much burden
to answer those questions possibly not easy to answer.

Warm regards,
Jinbaek

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jinbaek Kim
Ph.D Candidate
Dept. of Industrial Engineering and Operations Research
U.C.Berkeley
http://www.ieor.berkeley.edu/~jinbaek

Go Bears!

      :"'._..---.._.'";       `.             .'       .'           `.
     :      a   a      :                 __....._
     :     _.-0-._     :---'""'"-....--'"        '.
      :  .'   :   `.  :                          `,`.
       `.: '--'--' :.'                             ; ;
        : `._`-'_.'                                ;.'
        `.   '"'                                   ;
         `.               '                        ;
          `.     `        :           `            ;
           .`.    ;       ;           :           ;
         .'    `-.'      ;            :          ;`.
     __.'      .'      .'              :        ;   `.
   .'      __.'      .'`--..__      _._.'      ;      ;
   `......'        .'         `'""'`.'        ;......-'
         `.......-'                 `........'

On Mon, 5 Mar 2001 Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com wrote:

>
> Jinbaek,
>
> This is fine though you are welcome to spend more
> time with us this summer.
>
> Vince
>
>
>
>
>
> Jinbaek Kim <jinbaek@ieor.berkeley.edu> on 03/04/2001 03:45:40 PM
>
> To:   Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
> cc:
> Subject:  Re: Summer internship
>
>
> Dr. Kaminski,
>
> Thanks for your answer.
> Before I tell you the time frame,
> I'll need to talk with my advisor, first.
> Because here is an on-going-project.
> I need to coordinate the schedule.
>
> I'll appreciate it if you understand my situation,
> and give me some time (less than a week, of course).
>
> For your reference,
> probably
> the dates I'd like to ask you will be
> from mid-May to mid-July (2 months)
>
> Warm regards,
> Jinbaek
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Jinbaek Kim
> Ph.D Candidate
> Dept. of Industrial Engineering and Operations Research
> U.C.Berkeley
> http://www.ieor.berkeley.edu/~jinbaek
>
> Go Bears!
>
>       :"'._..---.._.'";       `.             .'       .'           `.
>      :      a   a      :                 __....._
>      :     _.-0-._     :---'""'"-....--'"        '.
>       :  .'   :   `.  :                          `,`.
>        `.: '--'--' :.'                             ; ;
>         : `._`-'_.'                                ;.'
>         `.   '"'                                   ;
>          `.               '                        ;
>           `.     `        :           `            ;
>            .`.    ;       ;           :           ;
>          .'    `-.'      ;            :          ;`.
>      __.'      .'      .'              :        ;   `.
>    .'      __.'      .'`--..__      _._.'      ;      ;
>    `......'        .'         `'""'`.'        ;......-'
>          `.......-'                 `........'
>
>
> On Fri, 2 Mar 2001 Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com wrote:
>
> >
> > Jinbaek,
> >
> > You can coordinate the details with me.
> > Let me know what the time frame is for you
> > and we shall send you an appropriate offer.
> >
> > Vince
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Jinbaek Kim <jinbaek@ieor.berkeley.edu> on 03/02/2001 04:43:06 PM
> >
> > To:   Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
> > cc:
> > Subject:  Re: Summer internship
> >
> >
> > Dr. Kaminski,
> >
> > Thank you very much.
> > Of course, I'll be happy to have an opportunity
> > to work at such a wonderful company.
> > I was contacting with Surech Raghavan at Deal Bench team,
> > and was going to express my appreciation to you again
> > after settling down process with them.
> >
> > For the period of working,
> > I still need to coordinate with my advisor and
> > may need to adjust according to that.
> > but anyway, I'll try to coordinate smoothly.
> >
> > Please let me know whether I should keep contacting
> > with Deal Bench team,
> > for working period and
> > for misc. living support such as finding a place, rent a car, etc.
> >
> > I appreciate you so much again,
> > for arranging such meetings and giving me an opportunity.
> > All this opportunity will not be available to me,
> > without your kind help.
> >
> > Warm Regards,
> > Jinbaek
> >
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Jinbaek Kim
> > Ph.D Candidate
> > Dept. of Industrial Engineering and Operations Research
> > U.C.Berkeley
> > http://www.ieor.berkeley.edu/~jinbaek
> >
> > Go Bears!
> >
> >       :"'._..---.._.'";       `.             .'       .'           `.
> >      :      a   a      :                 __....._
> >      :     _.-0-._     :---'""'"-....--'"        '.
> >       :  .'   :   `.  :                          `,`.
> >        `.: '--'--' :.'                             ; ;
> >         : `._`-'_.'                                ;.'
> >         `.   '"'                                   ;
> >          `.               '                        ;
> >           `.     `        :           `            ;
> >            .`.    ;       ;           :           ;
> >          .'    `-.'      ;            :          ;`.
> >      __.'      .'      .'              :        ;   `.
> >    .'      __.'      .'`--..__      _._.'      ;      ;
> >    `......'        .'         `'""'`.'        ;......-'
> >          `.......-'                 `........'
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 2 Mar 2001 Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Sorry for a delay in getting back to you.
> > > We would like very much to offer you a summer internship.
> > >
> > > Please, let me know if you are interested.
> > >
> > > Vince Kaminski
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>


Update on ski conditions on the western front--doesn't sound bad at all!  Glad you're coming up man!  DF
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 03/07/2001 07:50 AM ---------------------------

"rlfossum" <rlfossum@mato.com> on 03/06/2001 08:30:57 PM
To:	"Drew Fossum" <dfossum@enron.com>
cc:

Subject:	gear

Drew,
Not sure about gear sites for kid crash hats.   Could try www.rei.com .  You could just get  them hockey goaly helmets for multi-use and just hanging around the house  wailing on each other.  Haven't been to Terry downhill skiing in a while  but went x-country last weekend with the doggies and there's a LOT of  snow.  Brad and Jen are coming this weekend so we plan to check Terry  out.  Should still be decent in a couple weeks.  We'll let you  know.  Made it up to Hanna creek today fly fishing and cought a couple  wopping 4 inchers.  Wound up augered into snow up to my waist.  Bring  your fishing gear in case the skiing sucks.  Definately bring your  x-country gear.  Maybe we could get out for a quick morning at Eagle Cliff  and still make it to Terry to meet up with everyone else by noon.
See you later, got to go walk  hounds


FYI - Ken Gross and Bob Del Tufo have a meeting next Friday with Glassen.


Has anyone been able to locate a copy of this agreement?

Stephanie Panus
Senior Legal Specialist
Enron Wholesale Services
1400 Smith Street, EB3803C
Houston, Texas  77002
ph:  713.345.3249
fax:  713.646.3490
email:  stephanie.panus@enron.com

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	O'Connell, Denis
Sent:	Friday, September 21, 2001 3:14 AM
To:	Panus, Stephanie
Cc:	Cooper, Edmund
Subject:	RE: RVI Guaranty Co. Ltd.

Ed  -can you have someone look after this?

Tks,

Denis

Denis O''Connell
Enron Credit Limited
Enron House
40 Grosvenor Place
London SW1X 7EN
Tel: +442077834828
Fx: +442077839238
Mob: +447733001094

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Panus, Stephanie
Sent:	20 September 2001 20:35
To:	O'Connell, Denis
Subject:	RVI Guaranty Co. Ltd.

Denis,
Can you send us copies of the documents (Master Agreement and any related documents) related to the ENA / R.V.I. Guaranty Co. Ltd. ISDA Master Agreement.  Since this Agreement is for ENA, we need to have a copy of the documents on file here.

Thanks.  Please call me if you have any questions.

Stephanie Panus
Senior Legal Specialist
Enron Wholesale Services
1400 Smith Street, EB3803C
Houston, Texas  77002
ph:  713.345.3249
fax:  713.646.3490
email:  stephanie.panus@enron.com


---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 11/28/2000 09:31 AM
---------------------------

"Brian Hoskins" <bthoskins@hotmail.com> on 11/28/2000 09:27:32 AM
To: abamontb@slu.edu, allie_easton@yahoo.com, b2marina@aol.com,
mballases@hotmail.com, bsteinhart@yahoo.com, ebass@enron.com, g4k4jj@aol.com,
hcampos@enron.com, jzook@wfubmc.edu, jessica_n_burke@hotmail.com,
jaholzer@bellsouth.net, katschott@usa.net, krisy_p@hotmail.com,
l-walsh@nwu.edu, leninej@hotmail.com, brian.hoskins@enron.com,
mpstan0@hotmail.com, candjhoskins@aol.com, nina_bianchi@hotmail.com,
stupor@home.com, roberto.martinez@enron.com, roman14@hotmail.com,
rooneya@epenergy.com, tcgdoc@aol.com, kfaith24@hotmail.com
cc:
Subject: The Grinch

More election humor...

______________________________________________________________________________
_______
Get more from the Web.  FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com

 - Grinch1.jpg


IEP is continueing to cover the various CPUC/FERC/Fed Hearings in San Diego
related to the California marketplace.  We are doing this under the auspices
of the Market Response Project.  Below is a brief summary from Doug Kerner
regarding the series of San Diego Hearings last week.

IEP also is preparing draft comments in response to CPUC Commissioner Wood's
OII on Market Structure.  This will be circulated for your review and
comment in the very near future.

----- Original Message -----
From: Eric Janssen <EricJ@eslawfirm.com>
To: 'Steven Kelly' <steven@iepa.com>
Cc: 'Katie Kaplan' <kaplan@iepa.com>; 'Jan Smutny-Jones' <smutny@iepa.com>
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2000 3:39 PM
Subject: Market Response

> Steven,
>
> On IEP's instruction, I've paid attention to, and attended to the minimal
> extent necessary, Commission proceedings on the investigation into
> "wholesale" rate problems - with particular emphasis on SDG&E, as one
would
> expect.
>
> A prehearing conference in the Order Instituting Investigation (OII) into
> these issues was held on August 29, 2000 in San Diego.  It was
enlightening,
> for reasons I next discuss, and reaffirms pursuit of a strategic attitude
> for IEP which we previously have discussed.
>
> What I found enlightening was that a) the "consumer" representation was at
> an organized and well-informed level.  Speakers for this constituency were
> from, for example, the Chamber of Commerce, the League of Women Voters and
> AARP.  All had done their research and were almost uniform in their
interest
> in retail issues, as opposed to the obvious "greedy generator" issues
which
> certain members of the government institutions have attempted to focus on.
> These presentations were followed up nicely by a small, but significant,
> number of ESPs who presented or represented offers to provide new and
> interesting retail products if only the CPUC would get out of the way.
>
> I limited my presentation to the end, focusing on the procedural point
that
> a subsequent "scoping memo" from the Commission should invite comment, and
> in particular should certainly not preclude, inclusion of retail solutions
> in the Commission's investigation of ways to provide relief for SDG&E and
to
> prevent recurrence of similar problems with the other utilities.  As is
> obvious from this comment, I think we have a real opportunity to both
> deflect attention from the so-called wholesale-generator piracy and
increase
> retail opportunities for the Members in the context of this new OII.
>
> The only direct, adverse commentary I heard was from a Utility Workers of
> America "representative" who advocated 1) for reregulation of the industry
> and 2) against TOU metering on the view that this would favor moneyed
> ratepayers over the others.  I think our colleagues (which by the way
> include the ORA after today) will find this disregard of conservation and
> DSM opportunities to be distasteful.  I also think the underlying interest
> in these comments is pretty transparent and believe it was not lost on the
> attendees.
>
> Bottom line:  as we previously have discussed, this is an excellent time
and
> opportunity for IEP to introduce itself to the community here, and
statewide
> I suppose, as the voice of "electricity service providers" - which
includes
> the entire range of QF projects, renewable technologies, cogeneration,
> conservation, ESPs and marketers and new generators which have already and
> are now poised to invest many hundreds of millions of dollars in
California
> (to correct deficient and negligent investment in new infrastructure).
>
> I had a particularly enjoyable conversation with the AARP representative
who
> well understood, and was mystified at, the failure of responsible parties
> (SDG&E) to invest in new generation since it was "obvious" to all that
such
> investments were necessary.  I'll summarize with the mere observation that
> the BRPU story was of great interest to her.  She, and again in my
> estimation most of the serious participants, also is aware that SDG&E has
> failed to maintain the natural gas infrastructure necessary to support
even
> the existing generation, let alone needed additions.
>
> I look forward to discussing this with you in further detail.  As noted, I
> think IEP as the representative of the full range of new, old and
interested
> non-utility electricity providers has a marvelous opportunity to take the
> helm.  I'll be returning to Sacramento on Thursday.
>
> -Doug Kerner
>
>
> Eric Janssen for Doug Kerner
> Ellison Schneider & Harris  LLP
> 2015 H Street
> Sacramento, CA  95814
> Phone: (916) 447-2166
> Fax: (916) 447-3512
> mailto:ericj@eslawfirm.com
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:  This communication and any accompanying
document(s)
> are confidential and privileged.  They are intended for the sole use of
the
> addressee.  If you receive this transmission in error, you are advised
that
> any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in
> reliance upon the communication is strictly prohibited.  Moreover, any
such
> inadvertent disclosure shall not compromise or waive the attorney-client
> privilege as to this communication or otherwise.  If you have received
this
> communication in error, please contact the sender at the internet address
> indicated or by telephone at (916)447-2166. Thank you.
>


Dear Vince,

Thank you for your prompt response.  I do realize
that the A&A Program has finished accepting
candidates for this summer; I was inquiring about
the possibility of hiring on an individual basis.

Again, I greatly appreciate your time.  I look
forward to seeing you soon!

Regards,
Van


Hey -
Good to actually see you.
I thought maybe you were on vacation or something.  You never emailed me
back - or did I piss you off?
I wasn't trying to be rude if so.  Just being good ole sarcastic me.

How were your holidays?


Please mark your calendar for a mandatory staff meeting with Kevin Presto tomorrow, Oct. 24th from 4- 5pm in room 30c1.

Thanks

T.Jae Black
East Power Trading
Assistant to Kevin Presto
off. 713-853-5800
fax 713-646-8272
cell 713-539-4760


Hello Kate, just a reminder, we are working on Flow Date for Firm
3/28.  Could you please send to us before 1 PM (est.)?
 Thank you and have a nice day.
 Eric
 609-520-4683

-----Original Message-----
From: Kate.Symes@enron.com [mailto:Kate.Symes@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2001 12:56 PM
To: djenergy
Subject: EPMI Index Prices 3/27

Following are EPMI weighted average trade prices for Tues., March 27. After
discussing this e-mail with my manager, we've decided to only send the
information previously sent via fax. If you have any questions on
individual deals, please don't hesitate to call.

Thanks,
Kate Symes
Trading Support
503-464-7486

(Embedded image moved to file: pic01954.pcx)


Let me know what UAE says about the water source and how it will effect the
new facility, so we can finalize the O&M numbers. Thanks
Ben


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 02/26/2001
11:35 AM ---------------------------

	Gregory A Mausser
	02/26/2001 10:58 AM

To: Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam
Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patrick Ryder/NA/Enron@Enron,
Kevin P Radous/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: John Valdes/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Physical Template Revision2

Revision that unprotects "Top Level" cells.

Regards,
Greg


---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Neal/HOU/ECT on 10/12/2000 05:32 AM
---------------------------

Enron-admin@FSDDataSvc.com on 10/11/2000 11:50:14 AM
To: scott.neal@enron.com
cc:
Subject: TIME SENSITIVE: Executive Impact & Influence Program Survey

* IMMEDIATE ACTION REQUIRED - Do Not Delete *
Executive Impact & Influence Program

Dear Scott Neal,

As part of the Executive Impact and Influence Program,
each participant is asked to gather input on the
participant's own management styles and practices as
experienced by their immediate manager, each direct
report, and up to eight colleagues/peers.

You have been requested to provide feedback for a
participant attending the next program.  Your input
(i.e., a Self assessment, if you are a participant in
this program, Manager assessment, Direct Report
assessment, or Colleague/Peer assessment) will be
combined with the input of others and used by the
program participant to develop an action plan to
improve his/her management styles and practices.  If
you are providing feedback as a Manager of the
participant, please note that your feedback will be
identified in the summary report.

It is important that you complete this assessment NO
LATER THAN CLOSE OF BUSINESS on Wednesday, October 25.

To begin the online administration process, you will
need the following Internet address and Password(s).
NOTE:  If you are providing feedback for more than one
person, each password and participant name is
individually listed below.

Open your Internet browser e.g., Internet Explorer or
Netscape Navigator, and please type or copy the URL
address below into your Internet browser (please DO NOT
go through Lotus Notes):

www.fsddatasvc.com/enron

KEBTUW    (Fred Lagrasta)
EKCX8H    (Scott Neal)
CCFERB    (Mike Roberts)
4F9AD8    (Gil Muhl)

If you experience technical problems, please call
Dennis Ward at FSD Data Services, 713-942-8436.  If you
have any questions about this process, you may contact
Debbie Nowak at Enron, 713-853-3304, or Christi Smith
at Keilty, Goldsmith & Company, 858-450-2554.

Thank you for your participation.


I under calculated the MW capacity needed to meet the new renewable standard, and am reattaching the analysis.  The below table is the portion that was revised.  I used a 30% capacity factor since many of the new renewable resources coming on line are wind.  The MWs required could be inflated (i.e. cf of 50% v. 30%) in the out years if more biomass facilities are sited.

Date<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />

RPS Requirement

Actual and Forecasted CA Load

 MWH % for RPS

MW w/ 30% cf for RPS

6/1/2003

1%

158,315,000

1,583,150

602

1/1/2005

2%

274,772,000

5,495,440

2,091

1/1/2007

5%

289,189,000

14,459,450

5,502

1/1/2009

8%

304,364,000

24,349,120

9,265

1/1/2010

10%

312,246,000

31,224,600

11,882

Stacey Bolton
Environmental Strategies
Enron Corp
713-853-9916 direct
713-303-2632 cell
sbolton@enron.com <mailto:sbolton@enron.com>

-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 4:23 PM
To: Bolton, Stacey; Belden, Tim; Richter, Jeff; Mainzer, Elliot; Ring, Richard; Hammond, Pearce; Steffes, James D.; Mara, Susan; Keene, Patrick
Cc: Terraso, Michael; Keeler, Jeff; Schoen, Mary
Subject: RE: CA RPS proposal & potential impact

Also, unless something's changed, the obligation would be tradeable.

-----Original Message-----
From: Bolton, Stacey
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 4:21 PM
To: Belden, Tim; Richter, Jeff; Mainzer, Elliot; Ring, Richard; Hammond, Pearce; Steffes, James D.; Dasovich, Jeff; Mara, Susan; Keene, Patrick
Cc: Terraso, Michael; Keeler, Jeff; Schoen, Mary
Subject: CA RPS proposal & potential impact

All -
Wanted to make you aware of a couple of bills before the CA legislature that would place a renewable purchase obligation on all retail sellers in California if enacted.  The attached document provides a comparative analysis of both bills (which are quite similar in language) and the resulting commercial implications.   One bill in particular has momentum in that is it attached to the SCE bailout.  Jeff Dasovich and Sue Mara have their finger on the "pulse" on the movement of these bills, so as far as status please contact them.

Regards,
Stacey Bolton
Environmental Strategies
Enron Corp
713-853-9916 direct
713-303-2632 cell
sbolton@enron.com <mailto:sbolton@enron.com>


We have received the executed Master Power Purchase and Sale Agreement dated
11/14/2000 from the referenced CP.  Copies will be given to Legal and Credit.

THIS IS AN EDISON ELECTRIC INSTITUTE (EEI) AGREEMENT.


MWilczek@nyiso.com writes to the NYISO_TECH_EXCHANGE Discussion List:

The NYISO is reserving hours beginning 01:00, 02:00, 04:00 and 15:00 in the
July 27, 2001
Real-Time Market as well as the following hours per ECA20001006B to verify
prices:

PJM: 00:00, 04:00, 11:00, 22:00
OH:  00:00, 11:00, 22:00
HQ:  00:00, 07:00 - 08:00, 11:00, 22:00
NE:  00:00, 11:00, 22:00

Prices in the July 28, 2001 Day-Ahead Market are correct.

This e-mail information is a copy of the official posting which can be
found at the following address on our website:
http://mis.nyiso.com/public/htm/OperMessages/CurrentOperMessages.htm#mm


Frank,
I checked historical prices for R8. The vols posted by traders seem too high.
This causes
high VAR numbers.

Tanya

Tanya Tamarchenko
05/03/2001 09:40 AM
To: Frank Hayden/Enron@EnronXgate
cc:
Subject: Re:

Frank,
portfolio POWER-NW-LT includes subportfolios EPMI-LT-NW-PR1 and
EPMI-LT-NW-EX1.
The last one has VAR about 29M but when I look at the component VAR for
POWER-NW-LT
there is no VAR corresponding to EPMI-LT-NW-EX1.

This is probably irrelevant to the question we need to resolve: why
backtesting for POWER-NW-LT
does not look that good. Did you check that the prices behavior corresponds
to high vols traders post?

Tanya


---------------------- Forwarded by Stacey Neuweiler/HOU/ECT on 05/08/2000
11:46 AM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Ibrom, Lorraine" <lorraine.ibrom@gt.pge.com>
 05/08/2000 10:22 AM

To: "'Stacey Neuweiler'" <Stacey.Neuweiler@Enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Enron Scheduled Volumes---May 6 thru 8

Following is scheduled volumes on El Paso under Enron's K#5095-037.

Date             Package#           Volume                 Delivered to Teco

5/6                9E3X                  16,495
                     9J6Z                    2,759                   19,061

5/7                9E3X                   15,689
                     9J6Z                     2,243                  17,753

5/8                9E3X                    13,752
                     9J6Z                      2,799                  16,385

PG&E Gas Transmission Texas and any other company referenced herein which
uses the PG&E name or logo are not the same company as Pacific Gas and
Electric Company, the California utility.  These companies are not regulated
by the California Public Utilities Commission, and customers do not have to
buy products from these companies in order to continue to receive quality
regulated services from the utility.


---------------------- Forwarded by Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron on 11/10/2000
10:27 AM ---------------------------

"Hebert, Ann M" <ahebert@AKINGUMP.COM> on 11/10/2000 10:04:58 AM
To: "Freeman, Karen P." <kfreeman@AkinGump.com>, "Buchman, Jason A"
<jbuchman@AKINGUMP.COM>, "McKenna, Trent" <tmckenna@AKINGUMP.COM>, "Kinzel,
Jason" <JKinzel@AkinGump.com>, "Susan Scott (E-mail)"
<susan.scott@enron.com>, "Abell, Jan M" <jabell@AKINGUMP.COM>
cc:

Subject:

The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for
the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. This
message may be an attorney-client communication and/or work product and
as such is privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is
not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received
this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution,
or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received
this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, and
delete the original message.

 - mini_me.jpg


Exactly what I wanted.  Thanks maaan.

John Hodge
12/14/2000 08:47 AM
To: Phil DeMoes/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Les
Webber/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John Griffith/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Mark Breese/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Transco's Momentum Expansion and Elba

As a result of discussions for capacity to serve electric generation sites in
Georgia through Transco's Momentum Expansion, Transco has proposed a rate of
$0.32 plus 2.35% fuel for receipts in Zone 3 (Station 65) and deliveries in
Zone 4.  If you assume fuel on a gas cost of $4.00 ($.095 fuel), then the
total rate is $0.415.

Assuming the aforementioned rate, Southern Company can pay Transco $0.415 or
purchase gas from Elba and backhaul on Sonat at a rate of $0.22 which would
netback to Elba at Hub + $0.195.  If you assume a basis of $0.01 for gas on
Transco Zone 3, then the netback goes up to Hub plus $0.205.

Transco has also offered a $0.27 Momentum rate for receipts from Station
85/Destin (Zone 4) and deliveries in Georgia.  With fuel at 1.9% and $4.00
gas, the total rate is $0.35.  However, basis at Station 85 is $0.04 and that
takes the delivered cost up to Hub + $0.39.
This delivered price would yield a backhaul netback to Elba at Hub + $0.17.

Since Southern Company can site generation in Sonat Zone 2 (Alabama) or Zone
3 (Georgia), they are probably unwilling to pay this high a netback price at
Elba.  Additionally, most power developers will not commit to a baseload
quantity given that they will be serving a peaking market.  One alternative
is to sell to existing firm shippers on the Sonat system that would view Elba
as a savings on variable cost on their FT agreement.  The net is a Hub +
$0.10 at Elba assuming a basis of $.04 at Destin.

Through discussions with Phil Demoes, Southern Company has stated that a
price of Hub + $0.20 was out of the question.  Phil indicates that we could
probably strike a deal between their bid of Hub + $0.12 and Hub + $0.17.


over the hedge, off the brick wall, nothing but neck

-----Original Message-----
From: T FEDER [mailto:lawfeder@msn.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 2:25 PM
To: erwollam; b c; c k; chet_fenner; c.r.zander@att.net; Parks, Joe; john.chambers@bisys.com; brianc; c_r_zander
Subject: Re: Man Night

i got your email thread right here, dog.  Hey does this really go the Park's enron email?  Cool!  I bet not, I bet it goes to L2q3r6ft Raptor partnership in the Caymans.  In fact, I bet Joe is not Joe at all, instead he Joe Lay.  You know the second gunman......hmmmmmm..

----- Original Message -----
From: Erik Wollam
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 12:43 PM
To: bcorrier@cox-internet.com; knipe3@msn.com; chet_fenner@bmc.com; c.r.zander@att.net; Joe.Parks@enron.com; john.chambers@bisys.com; brianc@saltgrass.com; lawfeder@msn.com; c.r.zander@worldnet.att.net
Subject: Man Night

Men:

Hunting season is over. It is now working season. All email threads are
gone. No one talks to one another. This is wrong.

I therefor propose man night February 28th, 2002 at some location yet to be
determined, such as Tony's mexican food...on Ella.

e.

_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com


Attached is PIRA's latest "Electricity Daily Demand Forecast."

If you have any questions regarding the report's content, please contact
Morris Greenberg (email: morris@pira.com) or Victoria Watkins (email:
vwatkins@pira.com), at (212) 686-6808.

Contact John Graziano regarding PIRA report distribution and address changes
at (212) 686-6808, email: support@pira.com.

NOTE: Circulation of the "Electricity Daily Demand Forecast" outside a
Client's licensed distribution area is strictly prohibited. Clients that are
unsure of their licensed distribution or require an extension of their
current license should contact their PIRA sales representative, or email to
sales@pira.com.

PIRA Energy Group

 - ed051501.pdf
 - ed051501.xls


fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 12/07/2000
09:51 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Christian LeBroc @ ENRON                           12/07/2000 09:40 AM

To: Chris Abel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan D Trevino/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael
Benien/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, John L Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ted
Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bjorn Hagelmann/HOU/ECT@ECT, Homan Amiry/LON/ECT@ECT,
Cassandra Schultz/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Liquids VaR violation

Liquids VaR for effective date Dec. 06 is $8.5MM, a seven percent violation
of its limit.  The cause of the violation was due to the following factors.
Company wide crude position got shorter 6.3MM barrels
Short NG from Jan-Feb-01 of 1.2 BCF.  (EOL trade placed in error, position
Nowlan intended for was 10 contracts/month instead of 10 contract/day.)

With component VaR attached below, it is clear that crude product resulted
the most VaR increase.  Keeping everything constant, if Nowlan gets out of
his NG position, VaR would be $7.8MM.

Please contact me for questions

Christian x58062


W. Lance Schuler
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street
Houston, Texas  77002
Phone: 713/853-5419
Fax:  281/664-4890
Email:  lance.schuler-legal@enron.com

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kevin.Blodgett@dynegy.com@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, November 20, 2001 2:13 PM
To:	Schuler, Lance (Legal)
Cc:	keith.fullenweider@dynegy.com
Subject:	due diligence contacts

Lance-

We have had some discussions recently around the due diligence process and
have compartmentalized our desired search into roughly a dozen big-picture
areas.  These areas of interest are as follows:

- Corporate structure (minute books, corp secretary's function, etc.)
- Finance
- Pipeline assets (including the MLPs - EOTT and Northern Border)
- Generating assets
- Intellectual property
- Enron Broadband Services
- Insurance
- Trading book/Risk management
- Pending dispositions, plant/business closings, etc.
- Tax
- Accounting
- Human resources

If you could provide me with the names of the folks over at Enron that we
can contact for each of these areas, I would really appreciate it.  I have
not included real estate or environmental on the above list because I have
been told that Elizabeth Labinowski and David Nutt, respectively, are the
folks we should contact regarding such matters.

As for process, we are assembling a master request list that we expect to
forward to you by the end of next week.  While we think it is more
efficient to get the diligence done in small groups, we do want to get you
our request list so that you will know what we will be asking for and
perhaps be able to break the list up into its component parts for
distribution within your organization.

Thanks in advance for your assistance with respect to this process.  We
will do our best to make things as painless as possible for you.

Please call me if you have any questions.

Kevin


Enron announces UNLIMITED discounted AstroWorld tickets for employees.

Due to overwhelming employee feedback, we have negotiated unlimited
discounted AstroWorld tickets for you and your family in place of the
traditional "Enron Day At AstroWorld."  We hope this will allow Enron
families to plan their fun-filled summer trips to AstroWorld at their own
convenience.  Enron AstroWorld tickets are $20.56 (Retail $50), which
includes admission for one, plus a $7 meal ticket to one of five restaurants
at AstroWorld.

Six Flags AstroWorld is a world-class family entertainment complex filled
with exciting rides and attractions, including 10 heart-pounding coasters,
over  40 blockbuster shows, interactive street entertainers and star-studded
concerts.  Enron families will be able to purchase unlimited tickets for use
anytime during the 2001 season.

Tickets will be on sale at Enron's Federal Credit Union, EB0399.  Visit the
credit union in person to make your purchases.  AstroWorld tickets will not
be mailed.  Enron employees who are not already Enron FCU members may pay by
cash or money order only.  All Enron Employees are encouraged to take
advantage of this great summer fun deal and may purchase tickets through
August 30th.


CP, would you please follow up and get the right forms to fill out.  I will
give my $5k.
thanks,
mike
---------------------- Forwarded by Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT on 07/12/2000
11:53 AM ---------------------------

Enron PAC@ENRON
06/15/2000 06:05 PM
Sent by: Enron Announcements@ENRON
To: Enron PAC Mail
cc:
Subject: PAC ENROLLMENT

Last year the Enron Political Action Committee (PAC) launched a campaign to
become a "million dollar PAC".  Enron employees, who provide all of the
funding for the PAC, responded and the Enron PAC reached its objective,
becoming one of the largest corporate PACs.  This year we face a new
challenge.  With the sale of EOG, the announced sale of PGE and normal
employee turnover, we have lost a significant number of consistent
contributors.  We are seeking your support.  If you are not a member, please
join.  If you are a member, we hope you will consider increasing your
contribution.

The Enron PAC is an essential tool in our effort to promote sound public
policy.  Our PAC funds support local, state and federal candidates, of both
parties, who support open markets, deregulation and customer choice.  Amounts
contributed may be used to make political contributions in connection with
federal and state elections and are subject to the limits of the Federal
Election Campaign Act.  While our PAC has grown thanks to our employee
contributions, it still generates just a fraction of the expenditures of
those who oppose these ideals.

This year, as always, we face challenges and opportunities for every one of
our businesses, including such issues as taxation and regulation of
e-commerce, electric industry restructuring, regulation of derivatives,
international trade and investment legislation, pipeline safety, local and
state decisions affecting the siting and interconnection of power plants and
a variety of environmental and tax issues.  Enron has a long and successful
track record of supporting and advancing good public policy.  That track
record depends on access to and regular communication with, decision makers.
The PAC provides that access - - it shows policy makers that real voters care
about what they are doing.

One of the best things about Enron is that we don,t just take things as they
are.  We challenge the status quo.  We ask why.  We change things.  The PAC
helps us do that.  We need you to help the PAC.  Sign up today - and please
consider the following contribution guidelines:

Manager    $500/year
Director     $750/year
Sr. Director/General Manager  $1,000/year
Vice President    $2,500/year
Sr. VP/Managing Director  $3,500/year
Executive Committee   $5,000/year

All contributions are voluntary and these guidelines are merely suggestions.
You are free to contribute more or less than the guidelines suggested and
Enron will not favor or disadvantage anyone by reason of the amount of their
contribution or their decision not to contribute.  You may refuse to
contribute without fear of reprisal.

Only U.S. citizens and resident-aliens living in the U.S. can contribute to
the Enron PAC.  The maximum contribution is $5,000 per year per individual.
An individual may not contribute more than $25,000 to all federal candidates
and committees within a calendar year.  The law requires that Enron report
name, address, employer and occupation for every person who contributes over
$200/year.

No portion of any contribution is deductible as a charitable contribution for
federal income tax purposes.

Thanks for your support!  Sign up now, or revise your current contribution
level by connecting with the PAC intranet site:

http://pacmembers.enron.com


tease colts +4 under 48 250

   tease colts +4 over 36 250

   tease miami +8 under 48 250

   tease miami +8 over 36 250

st louis minus 6 1/2 250


See my 10/20 email to you.


Dynegy: Enron a 'Model Competitor'
It doesn't happen very often, so we're noting an apparently spontaneous
comment from Dynegy Counsel Ed Ross at a FERC Roundtable last week that one
of his chief competitors, Enron, "has done an excellent job of being
competitive." He suggested others could look to Enron as a "model competitor.
They've done a very good job of setting up a strong financial desk and a
strong physical desk and we don't see any problem with it. I think they have
set up their books in a way that they truly have separation between the
regulated and unregulated aspects of their business."
Ross had prefaced the remark, midway through a heated debate on affiliate
abuses, with the comment that "this is not an industry-wide problem. I
believe there are good and bad players in the market today."
Earlier, Enron's Leslie Lawner had invited "all of you to spend the day on
Enron's trading floor, because I assure you, you will not see a more
competitive environment anywhere. There is no way these folks, who fight like
cats and dogs among themselves, would voluntarily transfer value to the
pipeline group for the good of the bottom line." Lawner had to quickly back
off the invitation - mentioning confidentiality restrictions - when it
appeared about half the room was ready to troop over to the trading floor.


F R I D A Y   E V E N I N G   E X T R E M E   M A R K E T S
A complimentary service from INO.com ( http://www.ino.com/ )

Friday: The CRB Index has advanced 2.02 points to 188.39. The
US Dollar Index slipped 0.07 points to 116.44.

The Dow Industrials fell 5.40 points, at 9866.99, while
the S&P 500 declined 3.59 points, last seen at 1138.65. The
Nasdaq Composite fell 1.99 points to 1898.58.
_____________________________________________________________________

* FREE: MANAGED FUTURES & IRA KIT
AUDIO & VIDEO, reports, and info on Futures & Options IRAs
http://www.ino.com/specials/icm/manfut.html
_____________________________________________________________________

STRAIGHTFORWARD BUY AND SELL ADVICE
_____________________________________________________________________

Trader Chuck LeBeau and INO.com Team Up For CELEBRITYstocks!
http://store.ino.com/sale/1A433/SUBCELS-TopPicks

Dear Andrew:

Short on Time?

...then prepare yourself for a few well-spent minutes per
day as Chuck LeBeau teams up with INO.com in a first class
stock selection service.

Get clear trading signals and daily market guidance.
Trade with precise, well-researched short- and
medium-term trades.

Get winning short-term trades like these:

BMC Software (BMC - NYSE)
Long on October 16 at $15.50
Exit on October 26 at $17.38
12.13% Profit in 9 days!

IVAX Corp (IVX - AMEX)
Short on November 2 at $20.18
Exit on November 7 at $18.25
9.56% Profit in 4 days!

Starwood Hotels (HOT - NYSE)
Short on October 17 at $24.10
Exit on October 22 at 21.85
9.34% Profit in 4 days!

Try CELEBRITYstocks for a month.  You can cancel at
any time.  Chuck will email you each day's
NEW RECOMMENDATIONS and details on today's
CURRENT POSITIONS.

Members also receive the valuable MARKET OUTLOOK and
TRADING TACTICS reports along with state-of-the-art
charts to keep you on top of Chuck's market selections.

RESERVE YOUR SPACE NOW AT:

http://store.ino.com/sale/1A433/SUBCELS-TopPicks

CELEBRITYstocks - click to learn more!

Order Toll Free 800-538-7424 - 410-867-7424

All claims on third-party products are made by the publisher
and not by INO.com. All Products Guaranteed.

_____________________________________________________________________

E X T R E M E   M A R K E T   C O M M E N T A R Y
_____________________________________________________________________

The STOCK INDEXES http://quotes.ino.com/exchanges/?c=indexes

Stock indexes closed lower on Friday due to light profit taking ahead
of the close. The NASDAQ posted another inside day with a slightly
lower close as it consolidates below minor resistance crossing at
1933.94. Weekly momentum indicators remain bullish signaling that
sideways to higher prices are possible during the last half of
November. If the aforementioned resistance level is cleared, the 25%
retracement level of the 2000/2001 decline crossing at 2071.93 is a
potential target later this year. The December S&P 500 index closed
lower on Friday but held above the 50% retracement level of the
May/September decline crossing at 1137.45. The door remains open for
a test of the reaction high crossing at 1163.90 later this month.

The Dow closed slightly lower on Friday due to light profit taking
ahead of the weekend. Losses were limited following the release of
today's economic reports and ideas that the conflict in Afghanistan
may come to an end by the end of the year. If this fall's rebound
continues, the 62% retracement level of this year's decline crossing
at 10094.10 is the Dow's next target.

INTEREST RATES http://quotes.ino.com/exchanges/?c=interest

December T-bonds extended this week's sharp sell off on Friday and
tested the 75% retracement level of the Sept./Oct. rally crossing at
104-29. December bonds have decline over 5 points since Tuesday.
While momentum indicators are bearish signaling that additional
weakness is possible during the last half of November I would not be
surprised to see a modest short covering bounce early next week.
Longer-term the door is open for a possible test of September's low
crossing at 102-17.

The CRB INDEX http://quotes.ino.com/exchanges/?c=indexes

The CRB index closed higher on Friday due to a rebound in energies,
grains, fiber and foods. Session lows fell short of testing trendline
support drawn across this fall's lows. Closes below this support
level crossing near 186 are needed to confirm that the shallow
rebound off October's low has ended. At the same time closes above
this week's high crossing at 190.46 are needed to renew this fall's
rally.

ENERGY MARKETS http://quotes.ino.com/exchanges/?c=energy

The energy markets closed higher on Friday due to short covering as
it consolidated some of this week's sharp losses. However, upside
potential appears limited due to the possibility of a protracted
fight between Russia and OPEC that could last for some time.

December crude oil posted an inside day with a modestly higher close
due to light short covering. However, December remains poised to test
of the 75% retracement level of the 1998/2000 rally crossing at 16.83
later this month. If this support level fails to halt this fall's
decline the January 1999 reaction high crossing at 13.75 is a
possible target later this fall. Momentum indicators are bearish
signaling that additional weakness is possible during the last half
of November.

December heating oil posted an inside day with a modestly higher
close on Thursday due to light short covering. However, a sell off
ahead of the close tempered some of today's gains leaving the door
open for sideways trading on Monday. Session highs tested broken
support marked by the October 1999 low crossing at 53.40. If this
week's decline continues, the 75% retracement level of the 1999/2000
rally crossing at 48.50 is December's next likely target. Momentum
indicators are bearish signaling that sideways to lower prices are
likely into the last half of November.

December unleaded gas ended higher on Friday due to light short
covering as it consolidated some of this week's losses. However,
today's short covering bounce fell short of testing broken support
crossing at 51.87. While another day or two of short covering is
possible, the door is open for additional weakness with the June 1999
low crossing at 47.00 being December's next likely target. Momentum
indicators are bearish signaling that sideways to lower prices are
possible near-term.

December Henry Hub natural posted an upside reversal on Friday after
spiked below October's low crossing at 2.535. Additional strength on
Monday is needed to confirm today's bullish reversal pattern thereby
increasing the odds that this week's low marked a double bottom with
October's low. If the decline off October's high continues, weekly
fib support crossing at 2.402 is a potential target later this year.
Short-term momentum indicators are bearish but have entered their
respective oversold zones hinting that a double bottom might be
forming if October's low can halt this month's decline.

CURRENCIES http://quotes.ino.com/exchanges/?c=currencies

The December Dollar posted another quiet inside day with a lower
close as it consolidates just below trading range resistance crossing
at 116.60. Closes above Wednesday's high at 117.05 would confirm a
breakout above this falls trading range and could lead to a test of
August's reaction high crossing at 117.49 later this month.
Stochastics remain bullish signaling that sideways to higher prices
are still possible.

The December Swiss Franc closed higher on Friday as it extended its
short covering bounce off Wednesday's low. Monday will be a key day
in near-term direction of the market. A higher opening followed by a
lower close on Monday would signal that this week's short covering
bounce has likely come to an end. Closes below Wednesday's low at
.5961 would renew December's decline and set the stage for a likely
test of the 50% retracement level of the July/September rally
crossing at .5944. Momentum indicators are bearish signaling that
additional weakness is possible during the later part of November.

The December Canadian Dollar closed modestly lower on Friday, as is
consolidated above October's broken downtrend line. Today's mid-range
close leaves the door open for sideways trading on Monday. If
December extends this week's short covering rally the 25% retracement
level of the July/November decline crossing at .6322 is December's
next upside target. Momentum indicators are bullish signaling that
sideways to higher prices are possible near-term.

The December Japanese Yen closed out the week on a low note on
Friday. However, session lows fell short of testing October's low
crossing at .8132. If this support level is broken thereby renewing
December's decline off September's high this summer's low crossing at
.8060 is a potential target later this year. Stochastics and the RSI
are bearish signaling sideways to lower prices are possible into the
last half of November.

PRECIOUS METALS http://quotes.ino.com/exchanges/?c=metals

December gold posted a second consecutive close below October's low
on Friday thereby opening the door for a possible test of August's
reaction low crossing at 272.60 later this month. However, today's
mid-range close leaves the door open for a possible short covering
bounce on Monday. Stochastics and the RSI are bearish signaling that
additional weakness is possible during the last half of November.

December silver posted an inside day with a lower close on Friday as
it consolidates below broken support crossing at 4.15. Close below
last Friday's low crossing at 4.055 cents would renew December's
decline off September's high and could lead to a possible test of
weekly support crossing at 3.90 later this month.

December copper posted a key reversal up on Friday ending Thursday's
correction. At the same time December will need to close above
Thursday's high crossing at 69.60 to renew its rebound off last
week's low. If the rally resumes, August's high crossing at 70.60 is
December's next target. Short-term momentum indicators are bullish
but becoming overbought hinting that a test of August's high early
next week could trigger a round of profit taking.

GRAINS http://quotes.ino.com/exchanges/?c=grains

December corn closed higher on Friday due in large part to spillover
strength from soybeans and wheat. This morning's export sales report
came in at 31.9 million bushels, which was near the upper end of
pre-report estimates but still below the pace needed to reach USDA
export projections. Today's high-range close sets the stage for a
firmer opening on Monday but closes above initial gap resistance
crossing at 2.09 1/2 are needed to trigger new buying interest in the
market. Until then sideways trading will continue to dominate the
market near-term.

December wheat closed sharply higher on Friday as short covering
gains were exaggerated as buy stops were hit above 2.86, which pushed
December above last week's high of 2.88 1/2. While a setback is
possible on Monday due to ideas that today's gains were overdone
today's rally turned a number of momentum indicators neutral to
bullish signaling that the sell off from October's high has come to
an end. Today's rally found little support from this week's export
sales report, which came in at 14 million bushels and well within
pre-report estimates.

SOYBEAN COMPLEX http://quotes.ino.com/exchanges/?c=grains

January soybeans closed higher on Friday as bulls stepped up to the
plate and defended their positions following this week's breakout
above initial gap resistance crossing at 4.44 1/. Today's rally fell
just short of filling October's gap crossing at 4.53 1/2, which
coincides with the 25% retracement level of the July/October decline
crossing at 4.54. Closes above these key resistance levels are needed
to open the door for a larger-degree post-harvest rebound that could
last into the end of the year. Today's weekly export sales report
came in near the low end of pre-report estimates at 27.25 million
bushels. However, expectations for improving foreign and domestic
demand in the coming weeks along with a lack of sellers helps push
January to new highs for the week.

December soybean meal closed steady on Friday after testing the upper
boundary of October's trading range crossing at 167. A round of
profit taking ahead of the close erased early gains leaving the door
open for further consolidation on Monday. At the same time short-term
momentum indicators remain bullish signaling sideways to higher
prices are possible during the last half of November. Closes above
167 could lead to a test of September's high crossing at 171 later
this month.

LIVESTOCK http://quotes.ino.com/exchanges/?c=livestock

December hogs closed sharply lower on Friday erasing the gains of the
past three trading sessions. Much of today's pressure in the December
contract was due to bull spreaders dumping their positions ahead of
the weekend. With packers covered on their needed into next
Wednesday, weaker cash bids are expected to start the new week on
Monday. Momentum indicators remain bearish hinting that December
could renew its decline off last week's high and possibly test
October's low at 46.70 later next week before a bottom is in place.

December cattle closed higher on Friday due to short covering ahead
of this afternoon's cattle-on-feed report. Momentum indicators have
turned bullish signaling that Monday's low likely marked an important
bottom. The late- week rebound has V-bottom written all over the
market. This afternoon's cattle-on-feed report was termed bearish.
The big question is whether or not the decline ahead of the report
factored in all of today's bearish news. I am looking for a setback
on Monday as the market absorbs today's negative report. Here are the
highlights of today's report.

USDA estimate Ave. guess Range of guesses

On Feed as of Nov. 1 ----- 100% 99.2% 98.0- 100.00%

Placed in October -------- 97% 91.5% 87.0- 97.5%

Marketed in October ------ 99% 99.1% 97.0- 100.00%

FOOD & FIBER http://quotes.ino.com/exchanges/?c=food

December coffee posted an inside day with a higher close on Friday
and remains poised to extend its short covering rebound off October's
low. Closes above Wednesday's high at 50.00 cents would renew this
week's rally setting the stage for a test of August's gap crossing at
54.00 later this year. Momentum indicators are turning bullish
signaling that additional gains are possible near-term.

December cocoa gapped up and closed sharply higher on Friday as it
cleared both last February's high at 1237 and weekly fib resistance
crossing at 1261. This week's breakout above February's high has
opened the door for a possible test of the 62% retracement level of
the 1997/2000 decline crossing at 1349 later this year. At the same
time, if today's gap is filled next week it would signal that a top
has likely been posted as today's gap was an exhaustion gap.

March sugar closed lower on Friday due to light profit taking ahead
of the weekend. If the rally continues, the 50% retracement level of
the June/October decline crossing at 755 is March's next target.
Closes below this fall's uptrend line crossing near 691 would confirm
that a short-term top has been posted. Weekly momentum indicators
remain bullish signaling that sideways to higher prices are possible
into late-November.

December cotton closed higher on Friday supported by this week's
stellar export sales report that came in at 455,200 bales, the
strongest of the marketing year. Nevertheless, December failed to
exceed this week's high at 35.60 and closed mid-range on the day.
This leaves the door open for sideways trading on Monday. Closes
below Thursday's low at 33.40 could trigger new selling, which could
end the late fall rally. If the rally resumes, fib resistance
crossing at 37.25 is December's next target. Momentum indicators are
bullish but nearing their respective overbought zones warning traders
to use caution as a short-term top might be near.

Daily Extreme Commentary is brought to you by GLOBALcharts,
INO.com's end-of-day charting software for Futures, Futures
Options and Optionable Stocks. http://www.globalcharts.com
Search the INO Store  - http://store.ino.com/
_____________________________________________________________________

I N O   N E W S
_____________________________________________________________________

Pacific Exchange Adds 90 Options To B-D Auto-Ex Program
   http://news.ino.com/press/?release=27523
WTC Gold Re-Located And Eligible For NYMEX Deliveries
   http://news.ino.com/press/?release=27522
Tel Aviv Stock Exchange To Launch Euro-Shekel Derivatives
   http://news.ino.com/press/?release=27521
CME Records Busiest Ever Day, Sets Open Interest Record
   http://news.ino.com/press/?release=27520
Hong Kong Reduces Levies On Stock Futures Contracts
   http://news.ino.com/press/?release=27519

____________________________________________________________________________

E X T R E M E   F U T U R E S
____________________________________________________________________________

Updated every 10 minutes around the clock.
More at http://quotes.ino.com/analysis/extremes/futures/

WINNERS

PNM2   Propane Jun 2002                           0.3150    0.0200  +6.78
HOX2   Heating Oil Nov 2002                       0.5656    0.0298  +5.42
PAZ1   Palladium Dec 2001                         342.00     16.05  +4.92
CCZ1   Cocoa Dec 2001                               1285        54  +4.37
LBN2   Random Length Lumber Jul 2002              246.00     10.00  +4.15
DBZ1   Butter Dec 2001                           140.000     5.000  +3.70
NGZ1   Henry Hub Natural Gas Dec 2001              2.637     0.094  +3.68
SCF2   Brent Crude Oil Jan 2002                    17.76      0.63  +3.64
CLZ1   Light Sweet Crude Oil Dec 2001              18.03      0.62  +3.55
XWZ1   Wheat Dec 2001                            289 1/4     9 3/4  +3.48

LOSERS

QLN2   Central Appalachian Coal Jul 2002           30.50     -1.50  -4.69
LHZ1   Lean Hogs Dec 2001                         48.050    -1.375  -2.78
RRH2   Rough Rice Mar 2002                         4.160    -0.090  -2.12
XHZ1   Lean Hogs Dec 2001                          48.05     -1.02  -2.06
CLZ5   Light Sweet Crude Oil Dec 2005              20.89     -0.33  -1.62
PNZ1   Propane Dec 2001                           0.3100   -0.0050  -1.59
PBN2   Frozen Pork Bellies Jul 2002               74.500    -1.000  -1.32
TUH2   Treasury Notes 2yr Mar 2002             104 19/64    -87/64  -1.30
ZBH2   U.S. Treasury Bond Mar 2002             104 02/32  -1 06/32  -1.13
ZTZ1   Treasury Notes 2yr Dec 2001             104 56/64    -72/64  -1.07

*TWO FREE VIDEOS ON OPTIONS TRADING!
Learn How To Optimize Your Stock Portfolio With Options
http://www.ino.com/specials/oic/video.html
____________________________________________________________________________

E X T R E M E   S T O C K S
____________________________________________________________________________

Updated every 10 minutes around the clock.
More at http://quotes.ino.com/analysis/extremes/stocks/

WINNERS

TESTV  TEST SECURITY                             42.6300   11.0100  +34.82
TESTA  TEST SECURITY                            120.4100   30.2100  +33.49
ITXC   ITXC CORP                                  5.7200    1.4700  +33.18
AMIE   AMBASSADORS INTL                          19.4900    4.1500  +26.84
U      US AIRWAYS GROUP                             6.97      1.27  +22.28
MRVC   MRV COMMUNICATIONS                         5.2100    0.9300  +21.53
DNCR   DYNACARE INC                              13.1500    2.3200  +21.32
BRLI   BIO-REFERENCE LABS                         6.4000    1.0600  +19.67
DOC    MEDICAL ADVISORY SYSTEMS INC                 7.90      1.25  +18.80
RBAK   REDBACK NETWORKS INC                       5.3000    0.8000  +17.86

LOSERS

FLIR   FLIR SYS INC                              34.3400   -7.0400  -17.17
VINT   GOLDEN STATE VINTNERS'B'                   5.5000   -0.8200  -14.91
AEOS   AMER EAGLE OUTFITTERS INC                 26.2700   -4.2900  -14.07
FC     FRANKLIN COVEY                               6.06     -0.95  -13.57
ATPG   ATP OIL & GAS                              5.2900   -0.7100  -12.35
SSPX   SSP SOLUTIONS INC                          5.1800   -0.6700  -11.75
IMCO   IMPCO TECHNOLOGIES                        14.3000   -1.8500  -11.60
MAGS   MAGAL SECURITY SYSTEMS LTD                 7.1800   -0.8900  -11.37
RMCI   RIGHT MGMT CONSULTANTS                    21.9300   -2.8800  -11.28
CTRA   CENTRA SOFTWARE                            6.8000   -0.8400  -11.05
_____________________________________________________________________

T H A N K   Y O U
_____________________________________________________________________

Thank you for subscribing to the Extreme Markets Daily Digest from INO.com
( http://www.ino.com/ ). If you want to subscribe to our other email
services, or would like to modify your profile please visit
http://www.ino.com/email/.

To subscribe a friend, visit:
  http://www.ino.com/email/

To unsubscribe, visit:
  http://www.ino.com/email/remove/?email=alewis@enron.com&list=evening

--
Copyright 1998-2001 INO.com. All Rights Reserved.


Wes' memo finally went out to Sherriff.  DPR won't change at this point in
time.  --Sally
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 03/09/2001 11:50 AM
---------------------------
From: Wes Colwell/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/09/2001 08:10 AM
To: John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fernley Dyson/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: FW: Changes to the executive Viewer

John,

There has been a fair amount of discussion about this as well as the
reporting of drift for the North America businesses.  Both Mike McConnell and
Jeff Shankman are opposed to moving the location of drift in the DPR.  I know
that North America included US drift in its plan and includes "drift
earnings" in its margin.  I believe you do the same in Europe.  Jeff is
adamant that we not  move US drift from EGM's section of the DPR and has
asked for UK drift to remain, as well.  You may want to call Jeff.  Sally and
I will do what ever you guys decide.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Jeffrey A Shankman
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 2:15 PM
To: Wes Colwell
Cc: Sally Beck
Subject: FW: Changes to the executive Viewer

Please deal with this.  Wes, you know what I think and what we've decided
on.  Jeff
 -----Original Message-----
From:  Hickerson, Gary
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 7:23 AM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ENRON
Subject: Changes to the executive Viewer

FYI

Gary
---------------------- Forwarded by Gary Hickerson/HOU/ECT on 02/28/2001
07:21 AM ---------------------------

Michael Kass@ENRON
02/27/2001 06:07 PM
To: Gary Hickerson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Chris Abel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kenneth Thibodeaux/NA/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Changes to the executive Viewer

Gary

I prepare the London Summary and I have been requested by John Sherriff here
in London to have changes made to the reporting format of the Executive
Viewer report.  John's request and the changes he has asked for are detailed
below.  In essence, John would like Enron Europe's 'UK Drift' revenue to be
reported under the 'Enron Europe' heading in the Exec Viewer instead of being
reported under the 'Global Markets' heading.  If you agree to this change
could you advise Chris Abel and Johnny Thibodeux to make the appropriate
changes.  If, however,  you would like to discuss the matter further please
contact John Sherriff.

Regards

Michael
---------------------- Forwarded by Michael Kass/EU/Enron on 27/02/2001 23:50
---------------------------

John Sherriff@ECT
23/02/2001 16:27
To: James New/LON/ECT@ECT, Michael Kass/EU/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: JOHN PLEASE AUTHORISE Changes to the executive Viewer

Michael - Please move forward with these changes.

John

James New
23/02/2001 16:14
To: John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: JOHN PLEASE AUTHORISE Changes to the executive Viewer

John,

The attached is the format I believe we discussed and agreed with Ted a few
days ago. In order that the guys in Houston will make the changes they
require your authorisation.

If you can authorise by return then Michael Kass and I will forward it on to
the necessary people below.

If you are not happy with the attached please let me know what needs to be
changed.

Thanks James
---------------------- Forwarded by James New/LON/ECT on 23/02/2001 16:14
---------------------------

Michael Kass@ENRON
22/02/2001 10:47
To: James New/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Changes to the executive Viewer

Changes are required to the reporting format of Enron Europe's P/L in the
Executive Viewer .  Below is a list of these changes as well as the person
responsible for effecting each change:

Gary Hickerson: The UK Drift book is to be reclassified from the 'Enron
Global Markets' heading to the 'Enron Europe' heading;

Susie Ayala: The Enron Europe (Net Fair Value) Equity Investments book is to
reclassified from 'Merchant Summary' to the 'Enron Europe' heading;

Chris Abel: The following changes are to be made to the books reported under
the 'Enron Europe' heading:
 - J Block is to be reported as a separate line item;
 - Structured Derivatives UK is to include all other structured derivatives
and power/gas accruals (currently reported under 'Other' line item);
 - For each of the Electricty books, could you change the word Electricity to
Power in the headings (for consistency purposes).


The memo distributed on June 27 on Reimbursement of Individually Billed Items
requires
clarification.  The intent of the memo was to give employees an alternate
method
of paying for pagers, cell phones, etc.  Employees can continue to submit
these
invoices to Accounts Payable for processing or  pay these items with their
corporate
American Express card and request reimbursement through an expense report.
Either
way is an acceptable way to process these small dollar high volume invoices.


FYI  Attached is the draft gas agreement I had forwarded to EES earlier.  I
did not receive a response.

----- Forwarded by Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT on 04/25/2001 02:54 PM -----

	Gerald Nemec
	03/20/2001 10:08 AM

		 To: Bo Barnwell/HOU/EES@EES
		 cc: Andrew Miles/NA/Enron@Enron, Christina Finelli/HOU/EES@EES
		 Subject: Gas Agreement

Bo,  Attached is the draft of the gas agreement for the StageCoach
transaction.  There are still a few blanks for which Andrew is getting the
information.  Please review and let me know if you have any questions.

Also to follow up on our discussion from earlier concerning who would
actually contracts with the PPL for the Utility Agreement;  we had earlier
discussed Tennessee Gas Pipeline contracting with the Utility with EES acting
as their agent for interaction with the Utility.  However, I think it should
be EES who contracts with the Utility to receive electric service.  TGP has
contracted with ECS for Compression Services and ECS has contracted with EES
for power.  TGP has no need for a power deal.  Let me know what you think
about this.

It is my understanding that EES is working on a revised draft of the TA for
the Power Contract.  Let me know if this is not correct.  Thanks.


Are there certain plants where that have reliable generation numbers reported
each time?  Should I just track these generators?


Russ,

I got this from Regina just before she changed groups.

DG    3-9573


Ike, sorry for the delay, it took us longer to deal with certain issues than
expected.  I have faxed you a proposal.

Lets discuss at your earliest convenience.

Regards
Dave Delainey


She didn't leave me a voice mail.

From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 01/05/2001 10:44 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re:

Did Sheila leave you a voice mail?  She was trying to call you this morning.
I think she wants to talk to you about something.  Of course this could be
old news by now.

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	01/05/2001 09:28 AM

		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject:

I'm at home this am, as I want to go by GE's offices this am to get some
signatures.

Kay


As scheduled, we are planning a quick status check meeting on the SAP / Unify
/ Financials project  at 4:00 today.

Key points that will be discussed include:
Current status of any open requirement points (and resolutions to close them)
Current status of Financials development and testing (hopefully some good
news here)
Current status of SAP interface test (and we believe some good news here as
well)
Current status of contingency automated interface to Sift (Net-net: It's too
difficult to develop this in the required time but with the good news above
we may not need it)
Status and action items for FIT4 test planning in June.

Thanks.


This message is for the named person's use only.  It may contain
confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information.  No
confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.
If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and
all
copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify
the
sender.  You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose,
distribute,
print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended
recipient. CREDIT SUISSE GROUP and each of its subsidiaries each reserve
the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks.
Any
views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender,
except
where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state
them to be the views of any such entity.
Unless otherwise stated, any pricing information given in this message
is
indicative only, is subject to change and does not constitute an offer
to
deal at any price quoted.
Any reference to the terms of executed transactions should be treated as
preliminary only and subject to our formal written confirmation.

 - procedures.doc


Counting on Paul.

	Susan J Mara
	11/17/2000 06:25 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Meeting with Da Mayor

Didn't you want to send this to Steffes?


The EES domain controller which facilitates the EES VPN solution will be relocated from 3 Allen Center to the Enron Building on Thursday, October 25, 2001 from 4:00 pm - 5:00 pm CST.

EES employees who have not migrated to the Corp Domain will not be able to use their VPN solution during this time period.

If you need additional information, please contact the EES Resolution Center at x39797


---------------------- Forwarded by Eve Puckett/Corp/Enron on 12/07/2000
03:33 PM ---------------------------

Angela Barnett@ECT
12/07/2000 02:34 PM
To: Eve Puckett/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Regina Blackshear/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
kttn0965@aol.com
cc:

Subject: Fwd: [Fwd: Fw: Fw: Fw: Hee-hee]]

---------------------- Forwarded by Angela Barnett/HOU/ECT on 12/07/2000
02:38 PM ---------------------------

Deb Pepple <dpepplejes@netscape.net> on 12/07/2000 02:25:15 PM
To: Angie Barnett <angela.barnett@enron.com>, Sandy Farrell
<sfarrelljms@netscape.net>, Karla Funnell <jimmie4ever@aol.com>, Donna Hixon
<dhixonhhe@netscape.net>, Kim Rathka <mykim2u@aol.com>, Traci Rininger
<tlr_je@hotmail.com>, Jan Secor <JCsdaughter19@cs.com>, Marcia Tuskey
<NDFan-Ref@worldnet.att.net>, <bmetcalf863@earthlink.net>,
<noell@galaxyinternet.net>, <the.hen@gte.net>
cc:
Subject: Fwd: [Fwd: Fw: Fw: Fw: Hee-hee]]

____________________________________________________________________
Get your own FREE, personal Netscape WebMail account today at
http://home.netscape.com/webmail
Received: from rly-na03.mx.aol.com [205.188.158.40] by mx07 via mtad
(34FM.0700.3.03)  with ESMTP id 568eLgcus0503M07; Thu, 07 Dec 2000 02:20:18
GMT
Received: from  hotmail.com (f113.law3.hotmail.com [209.185.241.113]) by
rly-na03.mx.aol.com (v77.27) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Dec 2000 21:19:37 -0500
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC;
Wed, 6 Dec 2000 18:19:36 -0800
Received: from 209.252.210.40 by lw3fd.law3.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Thu,
07 Dec 2000 02:19:36 GMT
X-Originating-IP: [209.252.210.40]
From: "Laurie Lauer" <jakenlaneysmom@hotmail.com>
Subject: Fwd: Fw: Fw: Fw: Hee-hee]
Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2000 21:19:36 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_1df0_257e_3276"
Bcc:
Message-ID: <F1136btREqnhtHaRYsO00007ec8@hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Dec 2000 02:19:36.0584 (UTC)
FILETIME=[251F4880:01C05FF4]

>From: Karen L Beck <dakama@juno.com>
>To: Kab364@aol.com, Chapmanfamily@gocubs.com, promocate@aol.com,
>JodiF@TrinityL.org, claudia@talktotucker.com, MindyKal@aol.com,
>jakenlaneysmom@hotmail.com, klogan@phm.k12.in.us, mageelm@apci.com,
>dawn@mis-group.com, clownin94@aol.com, mpontenberg@yahoo.com,
>vpriller@elkhart.k12.in.us, mcqscott@gte.net, MLYHILSON@cs.com
>Subject: Fw: Fw: Fw: Hee-hee]
>Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2000 19:17:08 -0500
>

______________________________________________________________________________
_______
Get more from the Web.  FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com

 - newmovie_1.jpg


All,

There has been some concern about the lack of clarity regarding what
functionality is ready for user acceptance testing in the staging
environment.  To attempt to solve this problem, we have come up with a simple
process that will enhance communication and will allow everyone on the team
to know what functionality is in staging waiting for user acceptance signoff
prior to a release to production.  Please read the attached one page document
that details the proposed process.  Let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks,
Zach


The report named: East Power Desk Daily Position Report <http://erv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=14&report_name=East+Power+Desk+Daily+Position+Report&category_cd=5&category_name=EAST&toc_hide=1&sTV1=5&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=10/23/2001>, published as of 10/23/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">

<BASE HREF="http://football210.fantasy.sportsline.com/mp/">

Anna Kournikova Exclusive Fantasy Offer! Save 10% on Anna's 2002 Calendar! Yes 12 months of Anna!  Simply enter the coupon code FNTSYCAL in step 5 of the checkout process to receive your discount.  Offer expires 11/30/01.

http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/1/135/sffer1120tr.cgi

Attention Fantasy Fans!  Subscribe to The Sporting News now and get 4 FREE issues! Hurry!

Brought to you by

<MAP NAME="menu.map">
<AREA shape="rect" coords="0, 1, 83, 25"
href="http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/1/217/sffer1120e.cgi">

<AREA shape="rect" coords="83, 1, 166, 25"
href="http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/1/135/sffer1120tr.cgi">

<AREA shape="rect" coords="166, 1, 249, 25"
href="http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/1/224/sffer1120sn.cgi">

<AREA shape="rect" coords="249, 1, 332, 25"
href="http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/1/226/sffer1120c.cgi">

<AREA shape="rect" coords="332, 1, 415, 25"
href="http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/1/223/sffer1120v.cgi">

<AREA shape="rect" coords="415, 1, 498, 25"
href="http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/5/1/sffer1120s.cgi">

<AREA shape="rect" coords="498, 1, 581, 25"
href="http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/5/12/sffer1120w.cgi">

<AREA shape="rect" coords="581, 1, 664, 25"
href="http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/1/163/sffer1120t.cgi">

</MAP>

You are receiving these e-reports because you have signed up for
    CBS SportsLine.com Fantasy Football.  To customize, reschedule,
    or turn off these reports please
    click here

Standings, Summary

Team	W	L	T	Pct	Back	Strk	W!
ks!
	PF	Back	PA

Fear	8	3	0	0.727	0.0	W2	1.5	558.0	43.0	394.0

Grigsby	7	4	0	0.636	1.0	W3	0.5	560.0	41.0	451.0

The Rocks	6	5	0	0.545	2.0	W1	2.0	601.0	0.!
0<!
/TD>548.0

TayDang	6	5	0	0.545	2.0	L2	1.5	535.0	66.0	492.0

TexOK	6	5	0	0.545	2.0	L1	1.5	531.0	70.0	526.0

Hardtail Amigos	6	5	0	0.545	2.0	L3	1.0	505.0	96.0	495.0

McKay	6	5	0	0.545	2.0	W4	1.0	410.0	191.0	417.0

Metz	5	5	1	0.500	2.5	W1	1.0	446.0	155.0	434.0

Pink Panthers	5	6	0	0.455	3.0	L1	1.0	464.0	137.0	501.0

Tomaski	5	6	0	0.455	3.0	W1	0.0	425.0	176.0	448.0

FJS	4	7	0	0.364	4.0	L2	0.0	378.0	223.0	512.0

Top Dogs	1	9	1	0.136	6.5	L1	0.0	320.0	281.0	515.0

Statistics, Scoring

Grigsby Actives

Player	Pos	Scoring	Score

Manning, Peyton	QB	370 PaYd (12 Pts), 1 PaTD (15) (4 Pts)	16.0

Faulk, Marshall	RB	1 Ru2P (2 Pts), 66 RuReYd (3 Pts)	5.0

Garner, Charlie	RB	1 ReTD (21) (6 Pts), 106 RuReYd (7 Pts)	13.0

Crowell, Germane	WR	 	0.0

Galloway, Joey	WR	64 RuReYd (3 Pts)	3.0

Pickens, Carl	WR	 	0.0

Conway, Brett	K	2 FG (43,32) (6 Pts), 1 XP (1 Pt)	7.0

Jaguars	DT	1 Int (3 Pts), 2 SACK (2 Pts), 1 DFR (3 Pts)	8.0

TOTALS	 	 	52.0

Grigsby Reserves

Player	Pos	ST	Scoring	Score

Aikman, Troy	QB	RS	 	0.0

Barber, Tiki	RB	RS	1 RuTD (12) (6 Pts), 165 RuReYd (13 Pts)	19.0

Chargers	DT	RS	2 Int (6 Pts), 3 SACK (3 Pts)	9.0

Price, Peerless	WR	RS	 	0.0

Ward, Hines	WR	RS	99 RuReYd (6 Pts)	6.0

[Morris, Bam]	RB	RS	 	0.0

TOTALS	 	 	 	34.0

NFL Reports, Player Updates

Latest NFL Player News

Freddie Jones, TE SD - Free Agent Updated 11/27/01
San Diego Head Coach Mike Riley said Monday that he is optimistic Jones will be able to play Sunday. He has been sidelined by an ankle injury.

Wade Richey, K SD - Free Agent Updated 11/27/01
Richey is likely to lose the starting placekicking job with the Chargers if they sign Steve Christie to a contract. San Diego would shift Richey to kickoffs only, after he missed two short field goals Sunday to drop to 21-for-30 on the seas!
on!
. In that case, you should drop Richey from your roster.

Steve Christie, K BUF - McKay Updated 11/27/01
The Chargers are expected to sign Christie on Tuesday provided he passes a physical, according to the San Diego Union-Tribune. He would handle the field-goal chores for the remainder of the season, with Wade Richey shifting to kickoffs. If you're a Richey owner and need a kicker, Christie might be worth a pickup based on past history, but don't expect him to be one of the better kickers in the league even if he does get the starting job.

Mark Brunell, QB JAC - FJS Updated 11/27/01!

Brunell is questionable for Monday's game against Green Bay, the third straight week his status has been in question due to continued pain in his quadriceps muscle. He will be limited again in practice, and it's probably a good idea to keep him on reserve for Week 12 in your league.

Terrell Davis, RB DEN - Free Agent Updated 11/27/01
Davis should be able to return from arthroscopic knee surgery in time for Sunday's game against Miami. He will practice this week before a final decision is made, but we're skeptical the Broncos won't have him split carries with Mike Anderson, limiting both players' Fantasy values.

Keith Poole, WR DEN - Hardtail Amigos Updated 11/27/01
Poole has bruised ribs that will likely keep him on the sidelines for Sunday's game against Miami. If he can't play, Kevin Kaspar would start in his place, and the Denver passing game would further suffer.

Rod Smith, WR DEN - Fear Updated 11/27/01
Smith now has two sprained ankles, and is questionable for Sunday's game against Miami. If he can't play, then the Broncos might have to start Kevin Kaspar and Chris Cole at wideout, depending on Keith Poole's recovery from a rib injury.

James Jackson, RB CLE - Free Agent Updated 11/27/01
Jackson's ankle remains sore, and he will be re-evaluated Wednesday to determine his status for Sunday's game against Tennessee. Benjamin Gay and Jamel White would continue to split carries if Jackson can't go.

Neil Rackers, K CIN - Free Agent Updated 11/27/01
Bengals Head Coach Dick LeBeau said Monday he has not yet made a decision on the status of Rackers, who missed two field-goal chances Sunday. He is 9-for-18 in field goals this season, and Jaret Holmes has been on the practice squad since Nov. 1. Racker!
s !
will likely retain the job for Sunday's game against Tampa Bay, but he's a very risky Fantasy starter based on his struggles.

Akili Smith, QB CIN - Free Agent Updated 11/27/01
Bengals Head Coach Dick LeBeau said Monday that Smith might be promoted to No. 2 quarterback, according to The Cincinnati Enquirer. "If that's what they're going to do, maybe the Bengals need to get rid of me," Smith said, citing a desire to be traded if he's used in a mop-up role. He's not a recommended Fantasy choice, although it's important to note that he's now likely next in line if Jon Kitna gets hurt.

Terry Allen
, RB BAL - Hardtail Amigos Updated 11/27/01
Allen, who remains out with a broken hand, could return to the lineup on Dec. 16. With the Ravens losing Jason Brookins to an injury, don't be surprised if Allen takes back the starting job once healthy. Hold onto him if you have the room on your reserve list or play in a deeper league.

Moe Williams, RB BAL - Free Agent Updated 11/27/01
Williams becomes the Ravens' featured back after the injury to Jason Brookins. If you play in a deeper league or are desperate for a running back, consider picking up Williams, although you shouldn't expect him to post great stats unless the matchup is very favorable.

Jason Brookins, RB BAL - Free Agent Updated 11/27/01
Results of X-rays on Brookins' foot revealed a fracture of a bone in his small toe, which will sideline him for at least four weeks and possibly the rest of the season. Moe Williams becomes the Ravens' starting running back, and might be worth adding to your roster in a deeper league.

Wayne Chrebet, WR NYJ - Tomaski Updated 11/27/01
Chrebret did not practice Monday because of a shoulder injury. However, The New York Newsday reports that he is expected to play in Sunday's game.

Jake Arians, K BUF - Free Agent Updated 11/27/01
Arians has been released by the Bills. Buffalo has signed Shayne Graham to replace him.

Edgerrin James, RB IND - TexOK Updated 11/27/01
Colts coach Jim Mora said James' surgery to repair a torn ligament in his left knee was successful Saturday in Miami.  Mora said he received the news from orthopedic surgeon Dr. Arthur Rettig, a team physician. "I spoke with him Saturday and he told me it went very well," Mora said. James, the two-time NFL rushing champion, injured the knee when he was tackled awkwardly late in!
 a!
 game at Kansas City on Oct. 25. He was placed on injured reserve last week. James' rehabilitation is expected to take seven months. He is not expected to take part in either of the Colts offseason minicamps. Team president Bill Polian has not said whether James will be ready for the start of training camp.

Terry Glenn, WR NE - The Rocks Updated 11/27/01
Glenn could be put on injured reserve if he doesn't recover from a hamstring injury soon. That would mean the end of his season, and perhaps the end of his Patriots career. "I haven't reached it yet," coach Bill Belichick said Monday when asked when he would decide if the roster spot would be better spent on someone other than Glenn. "But as each day goes by, it gets a little bit closer."    !

Shayne Graham, K SEA - Free Agent Updated 11/27/01
The Buffalo Bills signed Graham as their kicker Tuesday, a day after Jake Arians was released following a missed point-after against the Miami Dolphins. Graham had been released by the Seattle Seahawks before the start of the season.

Stephen Alexander, TE WAS - Top Dogs Updated 11/27/01
Alexander, who has been hampered by a ankle injury, returned to action on Sunday. He didn't start, however, and may lose playing time to both Walter Rasby and Zeron Flemister for the rest of the season. Unless you play in a dee!
pe!
r league, dropping Alexander is advisable.

Az-Zahir Hakim, WR STL - Metz Updated 11/27/01
Hakim, who is dealing with an ankle injury, played in Monday night's 24-17 loss to Tampa Bay. He had three catches for 29 yards in the game.

Kevan Barlow, RB SF - Free Agent Updated 11/27/01
Barlow suffered a dislocated shoulder during Sunday's win over Indianapolis. "It's throbbing," Barlow told the Contra Costa Times
. "I couldn't really sleep last night. I had to sleep sitting up. It's hurting." Barlow is listed as doubtful for Sunday's game against Buffalo, so be sure to place him on reserve.

Terrell Owens, WR SF - TayDang Updated 11/27/01
Owens suffered a sprained right foot on Sunday to go along with his sprained left ankle. X-rays were negative, but Owens' foot was placed in a protective boot as a precaution. He is expected to miss some practice time this week, but he will be in the starting lineup on Sunday when the Niners face Buffalo.

Jeff Thomason, TE PHI - Free Agent Updated 11/27/01
!
<!
FONT FACE="Arial, Helvetica">Thomason suffered a hyperextended knee during Sunday's loss to Washington. He missed practice on Monday, and is status for Week 12 is uncertain at this time. The reserve tight end has very little value as a Fantasy player.

Donald Driver, WR GB - Free Agent Updated 11/27/01
Driver, who has been inactive for three straight weeks due to a thigh injury, returned to practice on Monday. His status for Week 12 remains unclear, but he's not worth starting on your Fantasy team in any event.

Tyrone Davis, TE GB - Free Agent Updated 11/27/01

Davis, who has been out all year due to a hamstring injury, will likely find out what his status with the Packers will be this week. Depending on his health, the team will either activate him, place him on injured reserve or cut him altogehter.

James Stewart, RB DET - Hardtail Amigos Updated 11/27/01
Stewart, who suffered a neck stinger in last Thursday's game against Green Bay, is expected to be available for Week 12. He'll have a tough time posting good Fantasy numbers against Chicago's tough run defense, but the lack of depth at running back in the league makes it tough to bench him.

Charlie Batch!
</!
B>, QB DET - Pink Panthers Updated 11/27/01
According to the Detroit Free Press, Batch is expected to start Sunday's game against Chicago despite a groin injury. "This is Charlie's offense," coach Marty Mornhinweg said. "He practiced a little bit today...he was in all weekend getting (the injury) treated...I would expect him close to full speed Wednesday." He'll likely lose snaps to rookie QB Mike McMahon, however, so starting Batch is a risky proposition.

Jackie Harris, TE DAL - Free Agent Updated 11/27/01
Harris missed last week's game against Denver due to a hamstring injury. The veteran tight end is listed as day to day.

Anthony Thomas, RB CHI - Free Agent Updated 11/27/01
According to coach Dick Jaroun, Thomas' status for Week 12 is still uncertain. In fact, the Bears don't expect to know if Thomas, who is dealing with a hamstring injury, will be available until later in the week.

Brad Hoover, RB CAR - Free Agent Updated 11/27/01
Hoover (neck) will likely be held out of practice this week. However, the Panthers are hopeful that he'll be available for Sunday's game against New Orleans.

More Updates

Copyright 2001 Commissioner.COM Inc and SportsLine.com Inc.
Your site can be reached from http://fantasy.sportsline.com

FB10SP


Gerald,

This CA is to cover a proposed transaction for delivered natural gas supply via existing infrastructure to a facility under development by Cogentrix.  I modeled the CA after the Peoples CA.  Let me know if this satisfies ENA's legal needs.

Regards,

Jared Kaiser
Director - Southeast Origination
Enron North America


1.05/1.35

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kumar, Vivek
Sent:	Monday, October 15, 2001 10:14 AM
To:	May, Larry
Subject:	Peaker price for NGI Chicago Feb

Larry,

Could I have the price for a 2 day swing peaker option at NGI Chicago, that can be exercised on any day in February 2002. Strike is FOM February, and the quantity is 300,000 MMBtu/Day. If you have any questions, pls let me know. Thanks for your help.

Vivek Kumar
Weather Risk Management
3-5582


Jeff,

Sorry, I didn't realize we were attacking this one early over the holiday,
and I was out of town
until this afternoon. My conclusions differed from the attached write up on a
few points, but I am
not certain my thinking is the correct way. Here goes:

On the expropriation:

In the write up we say "We agree with the executive that Global should report
the expropriation
contingency in its 1994 report since both conditions included in FASB #5 were
met:  1) sufficient
information to assess that a loss is probable and 2) the loss could be
reasonably estimated.
Matuto took power in 1994 and it was known that he would nationalize major
industries.  "

The book says "The imminence of an expropriation may be indicated by a public
or private
declaration of intent by a government to expropriate assess of the enterprise
or actual
expropriation of assets of other enterpises." I would argue that Matuto was
not the government and
therefore unable to enforce these assertions when he was running for office.
It also says FASB 5
requires the two accrual criteria to be met.

As I understand it, the government took over sometime last year and
nationalization of resources
was part of their platform. However, the announcement occured in mid-Feb 1995
that the government
intends to nationalize the mining industry. Also, the taking over of the
telephone company took
place in January. Since both of these events happened in 1995, I would think
they should not accrue
in 1994 because the asset was not actually impaired in 1994, in fact the
asset was fully functional
and operational for the entire financial reporting period. I believe they
should disclose that the
possibility of expropriation exists in 1994, but I think they should not
accrue..

I disagree that the company should cease use of the patent infringing
technology, I believe that
companies frequently make conscious business decisions to infringe upon
patents. Since I agree that
an accrual is not in order, perhaps a general disclosure regarding patent
litigation should be
made.

The book states that "If there are several aspects of litigation, each of
which gives rise to a
possible claim, then the accrual criteria should be applied to each possible
claim...."

Thus I think we should break up the product liability suit into pieces.
They've agreed to pay 1M
for lost rentals. This should clearly be accrued, assuming it hasn't been
paid yet. The tenants
claims are expected to be settled for 1M, this too should be accrued. The
surrounding property
claims are not estimable, and therefore should be handled with a disclosure.

Christine

Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com wrote:

> OK folks, here it is.  Sorry for the delay, but those pesky questions ended
> up being more detailed than I anticipated.  Please take a quick look and
> let me know if there are any comments---more ambiguities than usual in this
> one.  I'll await comments and finalize this evening.
>
> Jimmie/Dylan--my apologies, but last Wednesday evening, I found out that I
> have to be in LA for a meeting tomorrow.  If I make it to class at all
> tomorrow, I won't get there until after the break.  Could one of you print
> out the case and bring it to class?  If not, don' t sweat it, I'll email
> him an electronic and turn in a hard copy to him on Tuesday. Sorry for any
> hassle.
>
> Best,
> Jeff
>
> (See attached file: Case 26-1 Global Industries.doc)
>
>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                                              Name: Case 26-1 Global
Industries.doc
>    Case 26-1 Global Industries.doc           Type: Microsoft Word Document
(application/msword)
>                                          Encoding: base64
>                                   Download Status: Not downloaded with
message

 - christine.piesco.vcf