Good morning,

I am not sure if you are aware of the recent statements by the Prime
Minister of Canada, on his recent political trip to Whitehorse, Yukon.  He
made some erroneous statements regarding Canada's position on the ANGTS
project and Canada's requirements for any project.

The attached Official Background brief was issued by the PMO (Prime
Minister's Office) in Ottawa.  As you can see from the brief, Canada does
not agree that Foothills or the ANGTS project has exclusivity on a project
for delivering gas from Alaska.  Furthermore, Canada will ensure that any
project in the north will give maximum economic benefit to northerners.

I hope you find the attached document informative.  If you have any further
questions, please feel free to give me a call at your convenience.

Best regards,

Bruce

 - Backgrounder PMO.doc


Since you will be out of the office next Monday, November 13, you will need
to have someone fill in for you at the staff meeting.

Martha


Please find attached the Curve validation & Profit and Loss report for
November 2000

Regards,
Mike
x36625


No

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Bharati, Rakesh
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2001 4:42 PM
To: Port, David
Cc: Kaminski, Vince
Subject: Raptors

Hi David,

I would like to check with you just to be on the safe side.  I left our last
meeting with the impression that only Naveen and I would be working together
on the Raptors.  However, I heard from Naveen earlier today and he wanted to
include Thomas (Mark, I presume) in the meeting as well.  I would like to
ensure if that is indeed your intention.  Please advise.  Thanks.

Rakesh


Just a reminder:

		YOUR TIME ENTRY IS DUE.

		If you have log-in problems call the Integrated Solutions Center at 713-345-4727.


I have also been meaning to email you.  Unfortunately, I do not have much
time to talk with you, I have to head out to alabama unexpectedly, my
gradfather is pretty ill.  We were wondering if you guys might want to go to
Jazz fest.  THe dates are 4/226-4/30(thurs. arrival, monday departure).  We
have about 5 couples going right now and the room rate is $440 per couple for
all four nights total.  Let me know if you are interested, we have to have
the rooms paid for by 2/15/01.  Talk to you soon.  Thanks.
PL


Susan,

Please use the new master instead of the old GISB.

Stacy


BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTS

East Power Group
The East Power Group is off to another strong start in 2001.  The realignment
of the group into regional business units with joint trading, mid-marketing,
and origination operations has proven to be a catalyst for deal flow,
producing both a high volume of transactions and high value.  More
transactions were executed in January than any month last year, including one
deal that will bring tremendous strategic value to Enron as well.

Executed in January, was the purchase of two 35 MW coal-fired cogeneration
facilities located in southeastern North Carolina.  ENA will supply steam to
the industrial host, Alamac Knit Fabrics, and will sell power into the
merchant market.  The plants are inside Carolina Power & Light's service
territory, which is connected to AEP, Virginia Power, Duke, SCEG and SCPSA.
These plants are the first purely merchant facilities in North Carolina.
This deal exemplifies how Enron leverages its talent in that originators from
the East Power Group and Industrial Markets Group joined forces to bring this
deal to execution.  They also leveraged the Global Markets group to manage
the coal supply and emissions issues.

Prospects going forward look promising as a number of high value transactions
are in the pipeline.  Of particular note is The Sandhill Power Project, a 180
MW peaking facility currently under construction in Austin.  The facility is
scheduled to come online in June, in time for the advent of deregulation in
Texas. The joint venture, between EPMI and Austin Energy, will provide both
trading groups with a highly flexible asset, enabling them to access
real-time volatility while hedging existing obligations.

Additionally, the Fort Pierce (Florida) City Council voted 5 to 0 in favor of
Enron's proposal to repower the Ft. Pierce Utilities Authority's (FPUA)
existing power plant in that city.  Our proposed 180 MW facility will be used
to produce steam to power the H.D. King facility at approximately 20 percent
less cost than FPUA can produce it.  According to FPUA officials, this
reduction in cost may lead to reduced rates for their ratepayers.  The
planned in-service date is summer of 2002.

Industrial Markets
EIM Fundamental Analysis Group grows again!  The Fundamental Analysis Group
continues to expand its staff and capabilities.  They will be introducing you
to specific activities in the weeks to come, but would like to introduce you
to the new staff members who have joined in the past month.

On the paper/pulp/lumber side, Bin Wang is responsible for supporting the
lumber group; Adnan Patel will be assisting with newsprint and structured
transactions.

For the steel group, Doug Parsons and Yana Kristal are providing market
analysis and econometric/price forecasting support.  Our latest recruit,
David Maxwell, is assisting with the evaluation of a customer management
system and developing analytical databases for all product lines. A visible
enhancement to the group,s operations has been the Intranet web site, which
has been in development for the past three months.  The site will be
transferred to a production server by the end of February.  The site contains
all types of industry, market, regulatory, analytical, and financial
information for deal analysis.

Another major development is the adoption of a customer information
management system.  EIM is currently evaluating Siebel Systems, a software
provider that has developed this type of information tool for EES.

IN THE NEWS

Enron has been named the "Most Innovative Company in America" for the sixth
consecutive year by Fortune.  That's right -- six years in a row.   We
continue to be recognized by our industry peers and other corporate
executives and securities analysts as the company that sets the standard for
doing business in the new economy.  Congratulations to all of you for making
it happen.

Enron placed No. 18 overall on Fortune's list of the nation's 535 "Most
Admired Companies," up from No. 36 last year.  We also were ranked among the
top five in "Quality of Management," "Quality of Products/Services" and
"Employee Talent."

This issue of Fortune is now available in airports and will be on newsstands
Monday, Feb. 12.  For more information, go to www.fortune.com.

NUGGETS & NOTES

"The revolution has begun......"  - Ted Bland, Director/HR Recruiting
Operations

"We trade propane and propane accessories" - Adam Gross, Director/Global LPG
Trading-EGM

WELCOME
New Hires
EGM - Robert Beyer, Jacqueline Darrah, Herbert Goodwin, Vera Ilyina, Tracy
James, Christopher Mulcahy, LaBricia Seyrus
ENA - Tonya Dennis, Kathryn Sheppard, Bin Wang

LEGAL STUFF

The information contained in this newsletter is confidential and proprietary
to Enron Corp. and its subsidiaries.  It is intended for internal use only
and should not be disclosed.


I have not followed this.  Should I ?

	Dan Lyons
	07/24/2000 09:16 AM

		 To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: SWPC Warranty Claim

FYI
----- Forwarded by Dan Lyons/HOU/ECT on 07/24/2000 09:16 AM -----

	"Tiehen, Thomas M." <ttiehen@TENASKA.com>
	07/20/2000 01:03 PM

		 To: "'Mike.Mazowita@enron.com'" <Mike.Mazowita@enron.com>,
"'carl.tricoli@enron.com'" <carl.tricoli@enron.com>, "'Dan.Lyons@enron.com'"
<Dan.Lyons@enron.com>
		 cc: "Howell, H. Dwight" <dhowell@TENASKA.com>, "Quinn, Ronald N."
<rquinn@TENASKA.com>
		 Subject: SWPC Warranty Claim

We have changed the letter slightly:
  <<TIVTPSWPCWarranty.doc2.doc>>

 - TIVTPSWPCWarranty.doc2.doc


Dyn Draft.  MEK

-----Original Message-----
From: Meg.Nollen@dynegy.com [mailto:Meg.Nollen@dynegy.com]
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 7:33 AM
To: Koenig, Mark; Chuck.L.Watson@dynegy.com;
Steve.W.Bergstrom@dynegy.com; Rob.D.Doty@dynegy.com;
Deborah.Fiorito@dynegy.com
Cc: John.Sousa@dynegy.com; Arthur.J.Shannon@dynegy.com;
Katie.L.Pipkin@dynegy.com
Subject: script revised

(See attached file: FINALGIPPER CONFERENCE CALL SCRIPT.doc)

Meg Nollen
SVP Investor Relations
Dynegy Inc.
713/767-8707


Jeff, Greg and John,

Our old friend Tom Costantino is interested in coming back
to Enron. It seems that his move to NYMEX either will not happen
or will not happen for some time.

You can contact him at home:

Phone: (713) 860 8687 (h)

Vince


Hi Stuart,

I believe the plant manager was going to call someone at SW, to keep the
communication lines open.  I'll be glad to draft a friendly letter to follow
up.

Kay

From: Stuart Zisman@ECT on 05/21/2001 09:35 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Follow up to Westinghouse letter

Kay,

I am not sure what we decided on Friday.  Are we going to send another (more
friendly) letter to the Westinghouse people evidencing a willingness to
discuss the draw issue?  Please let me know at your convenience.

Stuart


Interesting ideas on Reliant and Orion asset transfer.

Jim
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"PennFuture" <pennfuture@pennfuture.org>@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, November 08, 2001 5:29 PM
To:	Friends of PennFuture
Subject:	PennFuture's E-cubed - When is Bigger Better?

Reminder - the Second Annual Green Power: Turn It On! Awards  Luncheon is on November 15!
REGISTER TODAY!!

using renewable energy?Promotes energy  independence. Ensures a cleaner and healthier future for Pennsylvania. Builds  regional economic development and job creation.

Want to know how? Just ask the executives from IKEA,  CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY, GIANT EAGLE, PENN STATE, EBARA SOLAR, and the many  other Pennsylvania businesses and institutions that will be honored on November  15th. Join PennFuture and friends as we celebrate the people, businesses and  institutions that are blazing the trail towards a cleaner and healthier  Pennsylvania by purchasing green power, advancing policies that develop the  renewable energy market, and taking the lead in creating new renewable  supply!

November 15, 2001 - 12:00 to 2:00 p.m.
Omni William Penn  Hotel - Pittsburgh
$25 per ticket, $15 for members
Respond to this email,  see our website www.pennfuture.org , or call  717-214-7920
-------------------------------------------------------------------
November 8, 2001
Vol. 3, No. 21
When is  Bigger Better?
The Acquisition of Orion by Reliant
The  possible acquisition of Orion Power, the owner of many plants that serve the  Pittsburgh area, by Reliant Resources is the fifth major transaction affecting  Pennsylvania's generation and electric service since 1996. Reliant Resources'  attempt to buy Orion Power, however, raises issues not seen before in other  transactions.
Those transactions - the PECO Energy and Unicom merger,  the GPU and First Energy merger, the sale of GPU's power plants, and Duquesne  Light Company's swap of plants with First Energy and subsequent purchase by  Orion - did not increase the market power of a particular generation owner.
Why not? All the other transactions involved companies operating in  different markets, or companies that did not own generation, or sale of power  plants from one company to one or more companies. In fact, taken together these  transactions reduced consumer costs, protected rate caps, and decreased stranded  costs. They also led to important environmental improvements like new pollution  control investments and support for renewable energy.
Reliant Resources,  however, already owns generation within PJM and the purchase of Orion would add  generation to its PJM share, once Duquesne joins PJM West. For this reason, the  transaction should be carefully reviewed and used to formulate a new policy  concerning consolidation of generation assets within a single  market.
Specifically, regulatory bodies should make increased demand  response a condition for any transaction that increases generation consolidation  as demand response strongly mitigates market power. Funds should be devoted to  ensuring that all consumers with a load of 50 kilowatts and above are equipped  with time-of-use meters. This measure is necessary, as the single biggest  regulatory mistake to date in electricity restructuring is the failure to make  demand response a central part of restructuring. Without it, workably  competitive markets will not develop or be sustained.
Apart from  increasing demand response, regulators and the Office of Consumer Advocate  should get answers to the following questions:
- Will Reliant Resources  permit Duquesne Light Company, the local distribution utility, to offer in its  service territory a competitive default service (CDS) program modeled after the  successful CDS program operating in the PECO Energy service territory?
-  Will Reliant Resources exercise market power within local markets and should  particular plants be excluded from this acquisition to eliminate market power?
- Will Reliant Resources commit to supporting economic demand-response  programs within PJM, instead of voting against demand response as it has done  recently?
- Will Reliant Resources acquisition help finance installation of  time-of-use meters for all customers with demand more than 50 kilowatts within  the Duquesne control area?
- What will Reliant Resources do to clean up some  of the heavily polluting plants that it owns now or will acquire from Orion?
Reliant owns portions of Keystone and Conemaugh and Shawville power  plants. It would buy from Orion the Cheswick unit. Keystone and Cheswick have no  scrubbers installed to reduce sulfur dioxide emissions, while Shawville has been  scrubbing one out of four boilers. In 2000, Keystone, Shawville and Cheswick  respectively released 153,490 tons, 48,243 tons, and 44,908 tons of SOx into  Pennsylvania's air. Keystone is also the biggest emitter of mercury in the  entire country and all four plants spew huge amounts of nitrogen oxide - at a  rate more than double the modern standard of .15 lbs/mmbtu. That's not all - all  four plants produce an amazing 30 million tons of carbon dioxide, helping  Pennsylvania to contribute 1 percent of the entire world's human-induced global  warming gases.
Reliant can begin cleaning up by implementing in the  Duquesne area the equivalent of the PECO Service Territory's CDS program, which  includes a Renewable Portfolio Standard that increases annually the amount of  renewable energy that must be supplied to customers. CDS customers there are  served by New Power and Green Mountain Energy at 5.56 cents per kilowatt-hour  (kWh), more than three cents less than the 8.65 cents per kWh PECO Energy  charged its residential customers in 1996 for coal and nuclear power.
Market Power Issues
In addition to environmental  issues, market power issues must be examined. Such an inquiry hinges on defining  the relevant market and products.
Nationally, total generation capacity  is approximately 800,000 MW, with most of it subject to base rate regulation in  the retail market. Despite regulation at retail, wholesale generation  transactions are generally price deregulated in all 50 states, whether or not  the entities engaged in the transactions are deregulated generation owners,  regulated public utilities, municipal utilities, or electric cooperatives and  whether or not necessary market institutions required for workably competitive  markets exist.
Orion Power has been participating in the deregulated  wholesale market. It owns 81 power plants in New York, Pennsylvania, Ohio, and  West Virginia, producing approximately 6,000 MW and has another 5,000 MW under  construction. Orion has done an exceptional job, improving the forced outage  rates, especially among its New York City resources.
The proposed  acquisition of Orion Power by Reliant Resources will form the nation's second  largest deregulated power generation owner, controlling 17,279 MW, or 6.15  percent of the deregulated generation market that totals 281,000 MW of the  country's total capacity. Reliant Resources has a smaller share of the nation's  total generation capacity.
Yet these small national shares do not  guarantee that Reliant Resources could not have market power in portions of the  PJM Market.
Prior to this proposed acquisition, Reliant Resources owned  about 7 percent of total PJM generation, or 4,262 MW of generation capacity  within the 58,000-MW PJM market. These facilities include 2,009 MW of base load,  803 MW of intermediate load, and 1,450 MW of peaking capacity. They are quite  old and formerly owned by GPU and Sithe (see table in attached document).  Reliant Resources is also developing another 1,316 MW within PJM.
These  numbers would indicate that regulators should focus on possible market power  within the Duquesne Control Area of the units that Reliant Energy is purchasing  from Orion. The Duquesne Control area is scheduled to become part of PJM West in  2002, but regulators and the Office of Consumer Advocate should ensure that no  plant is strategically located within the transmission system so that it  possesses market power even after incorporation of the control area within PJM  West. If any plants that would give Reliant Resources market power are  identified, they should be removed from this acquisition.
Addressing Market Power
The combination of large  generation owners creates concerns over market power that can only be identified  and addressed by sound regulatory action. In all three of the Northeastern ISOs,  there have been incidents of market power which have resulted in numerous rule  changes. There are several reasons that the electric industry is sensitive to  market power. First is the inability to store energy. In many other industries  surpluses can be built up in low demand periods and used to fill in gaps during  high demand periods. In the electric industry, energy is produced and consumed  virtually instantaneously. Second, there are barriers to entry in the electric  industry, including discriminatory interconnection practices and other incumbent  advantages. Third, historically the demand for electricity has been inelastic  and creates the opportunity for inflated prices. Inelastic electricity demand is  not surprising when most customers see average prices and do not have metering  or the ability to respond to prices.
For these reasons, concrete steps to  combat market power in the electric industry must be taken. For starters, the  existing market mitigation measures, such as PJM's $1,000 price cap, should be  examined to determine if they are sufficient, while not being burdensome as to  limit new generation resources from entering the market.
Secondly,  barriers to entry should be reduced, especially for distributed generation and  environmentally beneficial grid technologies like wind energy.
Lastly  and most importantly, demand-response programs can and must be developed.  California has shown that energy efficiency can preserve reliability and break  the market power of generation owners. Changing the demand for electricity is  the biggest and best protection against market power.
A Deeply  Troubling Tale
Unfortunately, Reliant Resources did not support  PJM's Economic Demand Response programs, voting against them last year in the  Members Committee. It had company, with all generation owners voting as a block,  with one exception, against demand response. Three cheers for the exception:  Edison Mission.
In the face of the mass opposition of generation owners,  PJM wobbled but did not cave. It changed but submitted demand-response programs  to FERC which were approved for the summer of 2001.
The moral of this  tale is that the public interest needs regulators, the PJM Board, and other  interested parties to further demand-response initiatives, because generation  owners will likely be roadblocks. In particular, real-time metering, residential  air conditioning and heating programs, and wholesale markets all need to be  developed.
It is time for strong action on these points. Regulators must  begin by requiring Reliant Resources to finance the installation of time-of-use  meters for all customers with demand of 50 kW or more within the Duquesne  control area. This is especially important as the transition there may be  completed by 2004.

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Our events calendar is full at PennFuture! Our Global Warming  Conference is coming up on November 9 in Camp Hill, and our Green Power Awards  Luncheon is on November 15 in Pittsburgh.

Election 2001: The Calm Before the Storm luncheon program is  on December 3 at 11:30 a.m. at the Harrisburg Hilton, followed by an open house  in our Harrisburg office. For more information on any of our events or to  register, please visit our website at www.pennfuture.org  and click on  Events/Campaigns.
We hope to see you at one of our upcoming  events!
-------------------------------------------------------------------
E-Cubed is available for reprint in newspapers and other  publications. Authors are available for print or broadcast.

PennFuture (www.pennfuture.org ), with offices in Harrisburg,  Philadelphia and Pittsburgh, is a statewide public interest membership  organization, which advances policies to protect and improve the state's  environment and economy. PennFuture's activities include litigating cases before  regulatory bodies and in local, state and federal courts, advocating and  advancing legislative action on a state and federal level, public education and  assisting citizens in public advocacy.

To unsubscribe, simply reply to this email with "unsubscribe"  in the subject.
 - vol3no21_110801.doc


No thanks necessary.  My pleasure.  Hope that it helped.  What was the gist
of his comments regarding the gas side?

Best,
Jeff

	Rob Bradley
	04/25/2001 03:43 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Gas Bullets

Thanks for all your help with this--glad your attention is focused on it.
Ken was prepared and talked a bit about the gas side at this lunch speech.

Thanks again,

- Rob


[IMAGE]	 	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]

             [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Upgrades  [IMAGE] DownGrades  [IMAGE] Coverage Initiated  [IMAGE] Coverage Reiterated  [IMAGE] Stock Splits  [IMAGE] Buybacks  [IMAGE] Dividends  [IMAGE] Pos Pre-Announce  [IMAGE] Neg Pre-Announce  [IMAGE] Pos Surprises  [IMAGE] Neg Surprises  [IMAGE] Earnings Revisions  [IMAGE] IPO - Lockup Periods  [IMAGE] IPO - Latest Pricing  [IMAGE] IPO - Quite Periods  [IMAGE] IPO - Postponements  [IMAGE] IPO - Withdrawals  [IMAGE] IPO - Latest Filings     [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] Unsubscribe  [IMAGE] Update  my Membership / Profile  [IMAGE] Forgot  Username / Password  [IMAGE] Add  / Edit Alerts  [IMAGE] View  My Alerts   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]    [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] 	  As requested, your News Alert for TXN  follows from EquityAlert.com.     Earnings And Option Expiration Will Drive The Markets On Friday - Commentary Part 1     (RealTimeTraders.com) - As we anticipated the broad market was quite weak throughout Thursday's session. This was evident by the sharp disparity between the number of advancing issues and declining issues on both markets. However thanks to the strength in few technology stocks, the Nasdaq Composite managed to hold its ground and finish in the positive territory, up 6 points at 1652. The Dow Industrials lost almost 70 points and closed at 9163 and the broader S?500 index lost 8.48 points and closed at 1068. Note that from a technical perspective both the Dow and the S?500 indices have now broken their recent uptrend.  Thursday after the close a slew of companies reported their quarterly reports that once again painted a mixed picture about future earnings. Dow Component Microsoft Corp. (MSFT) reported better than expected revenues, but lower net profits and also warned second quarter and full year earnings would be below street estimates. On this news the stock traded slightly lower in after hours. On the other hand, PeopleSoft, Inc. (PSFT) reported better than expected results on increased revenues and earnings. From all the earnings reports released thus far, it seems some of the sectors may be starting to see signs of stabilization, but almost none seem to be able to predict when an upturn could occur in their respective industries. Following are some of the companies worth watching that reported their results after the close: CA, KLAC, EMLX, NT, GLW, SUNW, GTW, SFA, AMCC, TQNT, IDTI, XLNX and EBAY.  Given the mixed earnings picture, it is difficult to anticipate how the markets will react on Friday morning. However, the momentum is certainly on the downside due to option expirations and the fact traders are still unwilling to hold positions over the weekend due to continued concerns about America's new war on Terrorism. We will continue to monitor the markets throughout the session and alert investors and traders to the overall market conditions and to the best and worst performing sectors. Copyright(c) 2001 RealTimeTraders.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved    [IMAGE]    ***IMPORTANT NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER REGARDING THIS COURTESY EMAIL***   At your request, as a subscriber to our service, this email alert is being sent to you as a courtesy and is for information purposes only. We are a financial news re-distributor. We are not an investment advisory and do not purport to tell or suggest which companies you should monitor or which securities you should purchase or sell.   In addition to the information regarding the company you are monitoring (the "Monitored Company"), this email contains advertisements describing products, services or companies for which we receive fees from the advertising companies. In the case of Cybertrader, distribution of this advertisement forms a component of a content exchange agreement with RealTimeTraders.com, Inc. We reserve the right to sell all or part of these shares at anytime, either before, during or after the advertisement period.   In addition, not withstanding our policy of prohibiting employees from buying or selling securities of an advertising company for a period of 20 days following dissemination of the advertisement, we may not be able to effectively monitor our employees to ensure compliance with the same. Consequently, there may be sales and/or purchases of such securities by our employees prior to, during and immediately following the dissemination of the advertisement.   Please note that (1) this email may not contain the full text of the press release issued by, or the research or other reports regarding, the Monitored Company; and (2) the text of the advertisement, the press release and/or reports were obtained from third party sources and were not written, generated or edited by us; accordingly, we make no representations or give any assurance as to the accuracy or completeness, nor have we conducted any independent investigations of, the disclosures regarding the subject matter of such releases and reports.   Please note that links to the advertising company and/or Monitored Company are provided for your convenience. We assume no obligation for the content of such sites.   All information contained herein should be independently verified by you with the advertising company or with Monitored Company or any other sources you prefer.   [THIS IS ONLY A SUMMARY OF, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO, THE "EQUITYALERT SUBSCRIBER AGREEMENT AND DISCLAIMER." PLEASE VISIT http://www.equityalert.com/home/disclaim.asp  FOR ACCESS TO OUR COMPLETE DISCLAIMER]        	  [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Stock  Quote [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] Stock  Chart [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] Covered  Calls  [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] Company  Profile [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Option  Details  [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] Black  - Scholes [IMAGE]     Market  Statistics  Power Option PLUS Logo     [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]    [IMAGE]


Just a reminder to send me a currency report.

Thanx,

Chris


Hopefully the third times a charm!

Robin


-----Original Message-----
From: Paschke, Al - TM-Ditt2 [mailto:afpaschke@bpa.gov]
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 1:51 PM
To: 'srosman@enron.com'; Rawson, Lester
Subject: Services

Sewart/Les--To the extent that Enron desires to acquire any transmission,
ancillary, or control area services from BPA-TBL, subject to my letter of
11/29/01, please reserve or schedule those services via phone or fax, rather
than over the Customer Web Interface.  Please let me know if you have any
questions.

Take care,

Al Paschke


Steve Kean asked me to forward this.

Scott_Bolton@enron.net on 09/14/99 03:16:46 PM

To:	Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES
cc:	Kevin_Kohnstamm@enron.net

Subject:	ECI Issues memo

Steve/Rick -- sorry this is so late, but this should be a good starting point
towards position papers.

Kevin -- check this out and let me know if this is what you were thinking
about
for you and Steve Elliott's use.  If you want it spread sheet form I can do
that
as well.  Or if you need me to focus on issues specific to Network
Development,
I can do that too.

(See attached file: issues memo.doc)

 - issues memo.doc


The two new pub codes that need to be addded to TAGG are:

1.     GDP-WYOMING
2.     GDP-KERN/OPAL

Thanks.


Christian/ Steve:

Please review the attached product description for a product that Sean Crandall would like to offer on EnronOnline.  The e-mails attached explain what Sean wants to accomplish with these physical products.  Let me or Kevin Meredith know if you have any questions.  We NEED your approval in order to continue setting this product up.

Thanks,
Melba Lozano
713-345-8986
713-646-8511 Fax
713-698-4847 Pager

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Meredith, Kevin
Sent:	Thursday, October 04, 2001 2:59 PM
To:	Lozano, Melba; Walker, Chris
Subject:	FW: Day Ahead "Financial" Parking/Lending product

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Puthigai, Savita
Sent:	Wednesday, October 03, 2001 3:41 PM
To:	Meredith, Kevin
Subject:	FW: Day Ahead "Financial" Parking/Lending product

Hi Kevin,

I think this answers our question. Lets go ahead and get it through legal.

Savita

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Crandall, Sean
Sent:	Wednesday, October 03, 2001 3:27 PM
To:	Puthigai, Savita
Subject:	RE: Day Ahead "Financial" Parking/Lending product

You are right.  There are no delivery/scheduling obligations on the day ahead DART product (unlike the regular day-ahead).  Yes.  A DART onpeak would mean delivery on all onpeak hours for the corresponding day, and a DART offpeak would mean delivery on all offpeak hours for the corresponding day.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Puthigai, Savita
Sent:	Wednesday, October 03, 2001 11:42 AM
To:	Crandall, Sean
Cc:	Meredith, Kevin
Subject:	FW: Day Ahead "Financial" Parking/Lending product

Hi Sean,

I'm trying to understand the mechanics of this product. If I understand correctly the only difference between day ahead and the DART product is that it does not get scheduled for delivery until the delivery day. Also a DART trade for the 3rd would mean delivery for all peak hours on the 3rd?

Savita

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Meredith, Kevin
Sent:	Wednesday, October 03, 2001 1:31 PM
To:	Puthigai, Savita
Subject:	FW: Day Ahead "Financial" Parking/Lending product

What are your thoughts on this?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Crandall, Sean
Sent:	Tuesday, October 02, 2001 6:29 PM
To:	Meredith, Kevin
Subject:	RE: Day Ahead "Financial" Parking/Lending product

Kevin,

My apologies for not getting back sooner, but I sort of wanted to see how the Enron real-time products did before proceeding with this.  It seems like real-time is a success, so let's get going with this.

I call this product DART (Day-Ahead/Real-Time).  It's basically a physical product that is transacted on a day-ahead cash basis, but is delivered on real-time.  For example, on the day-ahead, lets say I post a "US Pwr Phy Firm  Mid-C Peak Oct04 to Oct05 DART"  $27 at $28.  If I get hit, then the party selling to me is obligated to deliver on Oct 5th, real-time 25 MW each hour.  I would be long real-time at $27.  If a party lifts my $28, then I would be obligated to deliver to them on Oct 5, real-time, 25 MW each hour.  I would be short at $28.

The mechanics of this deal are much like a regular day-ahead cash transaction.  The primary difference is we would have to flag these deals somehow such that they would not get mixed with our regular day-ahead transactions that needed to be prescheduled.

As far as the product language goes, I think if you add the following language to what you provided below, we should be OK (obviously subject to legal review).

"This product is intended to be transacted on a Day-Ahead basis, for delivery on a Real-Time basis.  Day Ahead means the trading day prior to the day of delivery, consistent with WSCC scheduling and trading practices.  Real-time means the actual Delivery Day.  Real-time deliveries shall be consistent with generally accepted WSCC scheduling timelines and practices."

Take a look, give me a call.  Thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Meredith, Kevin
Sent:	Monday, September 10, 2001 10:12 AM
To:	Crandall, Sean
Subject:	RE: Day Ahead "Financial" Parking/Lending product

Sean,

The language is below.  Also, Savita wanted to conference call you this afternoon to discuss this product.  What time is good for you?

Kevin

A US Power Transaction with Enron Power Marketing, Inc. under which the Seller shall sell and the Buyer shall purchase a quantity of firm energy equal to the Hourly Quantity at the Contract Price. The Contract Price shall be as submitted by the Counterparty via the Web Site.  "Firm energy" is power that is or will be scheduled as firm energy consistent with the most recent rules adopted by the Western Systems Coordinating Council for which the only excuses for failure to deliver or receive are if an interruption is (i) due to an Uncontrollable Force as provided in Section 10 of the WSPP Agreement; or (ii) where applicable, to meet Seller's public utility or statutory obligations to its customers.  Notwithstanding any other provision in the underlying agreement between the Seller and the Buyer that governs this transaction (the "Agreement"), if Seller exercises its right to interrupt to meet its public utility or statutory obligations, Seller shall be responsible for payment of damages for failure to deliver firm energy as provided in the applicable cover remedy section(s) of the Agreement.  "WSPP Agreement" means the Western System Power Pool Agreement as amended from time to time.
The term of the Transaction shall correspond to the date(s) set forth in the Product description on the Website.
The transaction is for delivery or receipt of power at Mid Columbia.
The price is quoted in US Dollars per unit of volume, which will be the Contractual Currency.
The unit of measure against which the price is quoted shall be megawatt-hours (MWh) and the quantity shown shall be in MW's delivered in each applicable hour for the duration of the Transaction (the "Hourly Quantity').
The transaction is for on-peak ("Peak") hours on each Delivery Day beginning with the hour ending 0700 (6:00 am) and concluding with the hour ending 2200 (10:00 pm) Pacific Prevailing Time.  "Delivery Day" means a day during the term of the transaction that is a Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday or Saturday, excluding any day that is a NERC holiday.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Crandall, Sean
Sent:	Monday, September 10, 2001 12:07 PM
To:	Meredith, Kevin
Subject:	RE: Day Ahead "Financial" Parking/Lending product

Kevin,

Could you e-mail me the contract language we currently have for the Mid-C physical product so I can work with it?  (I don't have an electronic copy).

Thanks

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Meredith, Kevin
Sent:	Thursday, September 06, 2001 7:33 AM
To:	Crandall, Sean
Subject:	RE: Day Ahead "Financial" Parking/Lending product

I am the one to talk with about this new product.  I will call you today to discuss.

Kevin

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Crandall, Sean
Sent:	Wednesday, September 05, 2001 6:43 PM
To:	Meredith, Kevin
Cc:	Belden, Tim; Scholtes, Diana; Alonso, Tom
Subject:	Day Ahead "Financial" Parking/Lending product

I've had an idea for a new EOL product that I would like to start our EOL legal and contracts people thinking about.  It's kind of a weird product, but I think it would trade quite a bit once people figured out what it was.

It's called the Day Ahead/Real-Time Park/Lend product.  Essentially it's a financial trade on a day ahead basis that is settled real time.  For example, let's say Morgan Stanley agrees to sell us 25 MW onpeak for $25, but that it is not prescheduled--it is to be settled real time.  If we fast forward to real-time, Morgan Stanley has two options.  They can buy from us on EOL, whereby this transaction books out, or they can deliver us physical power, whereby we have to sell the power to a third party real time.  The nice thing about this product is it provides any party the ability to take a position to real time, even if they are not a control area.  In addition, it would provide utilities and generators the ability to hedge a day-ahead position.

Kevin, I'm not sure if it's you I need to talk to about this, but I would appreciate some direction if it's somebody else.  Once we identify who we need to look at this, I'd like to set up a conference call to discuss contract language and EOL mechanics.

Thanks.


fyi...

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Calcagno, Suzanne
Sent:	Wednesday, October 10, 2001 4:17 PM
To:	Goodell, Scott; Taylor, Craig; Lamadrid, Victor; Wood, Tracy
Cc:	Superty, Robert
Subject:	SOUTHERN NATURAL FILES $245 MILLION PROPOSAL TO BOOST CAPACITY

From Inside FERC (Oct. 8th)--pls let me know if you want more detail or would like to see the FERC filing.  Will keep you posted as the project progresses through FERC.

Suzanne
============================================================================================================
SOUTHERN NATURAL FILES $245 MILLION PROPOSAL TO BOOST CAPACITY
To serve local distributors, industrial users and power generators, Southern Natural Gas Co. filed with FERC last week to build $245 million worth of compression, pipeline looping and other facilities to transport a total of 359,891 Mcf/day. The project would be constructed in two phases.

The expansion would start moving 320,714 Mcf/day by June 1, 2003, said the Oct. 1 application (CP02-1 et. al.). In the project's second phase, Southern Natural would install additional facilities to move 39,177 Mcf/day by May 1, 2004. Phase one includes 114.5 miles of looping in Mississippi, Alabama and Georgia, which would be built in 11 segments that range in length from 3.41 miles to 16.74 miles. Pipe diameters would range from 24 inches to 36 inches. Phase two includes 8.8 miles of 30-inch-diameter looping in Georgia that would be
constructed in two segments of 4.8 miles and 4.0 miles.

Southern Natural proposed installing a total of 76,930 horsepower of compression, of which 11,280 hp would replace existing compression facilities that have deteriorated or otherwise become obsolete. Phase one includes ten compression units ranging in size from 3,550 hp to 15,000 hp. Under phase two, one 4,730 hp unit would be installed. Furthermore, Southern Natural proposed abandoning six compressors that generate a total of 9,930 hp.

All 359,891 Mcf/day of the capacity has been subscribed, the application said. During an open season held between Dec. 15 and Jan. 26, firm service agreements were reached with Southern Co. Services Inc., 97,950 Mcf/day, Calpine Energy Services LP, 95,000 Mcf/day, SCANA Resources Inc., 93,046 Mcf/day, Effingham County Power LLC, 58,766 Mcf/day, the City of Austell, Ga., 6,366 Mcf/day, Morgan Stanley, 5,400 Mcf/day, Proctor & Gamble, 1,763, and Kimberly-Clark, 1,600 Mcf/day.

Southern Natural asked FERC to allow it to roll in the cost of the expansion in its next rate proceeding "based on the considerable benefit to the overall rates of existing customers." Revenues generated from the new contracts are expected to exceed project costs by approximately $154 million, thus the expansion would result in "a significant benefit" to current shippers, Southern Natural said. In addition to the financial benefits, existing shippers will enjoy operational benefits as well, said the pipeline. "The combination of additional compression and new loop pipeline represents a significant enhancement to system reliability for all shippers delivering gas" in Southern Natural's market area, the
application said. Furthermore, Southern Natural promised that service to existing shippers would not be degraded as a result of the project.


---------------------- Forwarded by Dana Davis/HOU/ECT on 05/23/2000 05:49 PM
---------------------------

Rebecca Sanchez
05/17/2000 09:42 AM
To: Dana Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

There now can you leave me alone so I can get some work done!!!!!


Same time, same place -- just not as often!

I would like to maintain management team meetings on Monday afternoons from
2:30 to 3:30 in EB3014.  My plan is to alternate weeks for ENA and EGM
meetings.  There are a few direct reports, whose work extends across ENA and
EGM, who will attend both meetings.  Today was the ENA Management Team
meeting.  Next Monday, August 28 will be the first meeting with the EGM
management team.  I will look forward to staying current with each one of you
and Brent on the growth and challenges of the businesses within Enron Global
Markets.

I have asked Patti to cancel one-on-one meetings that we had scheduled on the
calendar going forward.  Although this new structure changes the direct line
reporting relationship, I will continue to be very interested in the
professional development of each of you.  I hope that we can schedule time
together on an as needed basis.


---------------------- Forwarded by Kristin Gandy/NA/Enron on 01/30/2001
03:19 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Kristin Gandy                           01/29/2001 05:32 PM

To: Jeremy Blachman/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Bryan Kite/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Michele Nezi
Marvin/Enron Communications@Enron Communications

Subject: Wharton Interviews

This is a request for your interview participation.  The Associate Program
will be on the Wharton, MBA campus interviewing summer ASSOCIATE interns next
week.  Due to business reasons, previously scheduled interviewers from the
Wharton team have had to cancel their participation.

Currently, I need two interviewers for Monday, February 5th and two
interviewers for Tuesday, February 6th.  Please let me know of your
availability.  Campus interviews are scheduled as follows:

Place:  Rittenhouse Hotel
  210 West Rittenhouse Square
  Philadelphia, PA 19103

Date:  Monday, February 5th  Tuesday, February 6th
  Day One Interviews    Day Two Interviews
Time:  8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.   8:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.

Interviewers: Bryan Kite - confirmed
  Michele Nezi Marvin - confirmed

In the event that you have scheduling conflicts and cannot participate, any
referrals at the Director or VP level would be greatly appreciated.

As always, thank you for your time and please contact me @ ext. 5-3214 if you
have any questions.

Kristin Gandy
Associate Recruiting


This in an automated e-mail sent out from the Commissioner.COM
web site.  Do not reply to this e-mail, but instead please visit
your league's site at http://football.commissioner.com/ene

-------------------------------------------------------------

Frank Ermis requests the following transaction:.

  Drop Darnay Scott.
  Add Oronde Gadsden.

-------------------------------------------------------------

To approve this transaction, please go to your web site and
select Transactions, Requests in the Front Office.


thanks for the look

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Arnold, John
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 2:05 PM
To:	Ward, Kim S (Houston)
Subject:	RE:

I went already lazy

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ward, Kim S (Houston)
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 1:48 PM
To:	Arnold, John
Subject:

Did you go this morning?  If not, do you want to go after work?


hello girls- haven't heard from either of you in a while, and was hoping
y'all were ok.  was supposed to be on a flight back to houston this morning,
but obvioulsy that's off now.  just got bk from france late mon night- had
lots of fun, race was ok, but looooong.  triped on harry potter's cape and
had to go in ambulance to emergency room to get x-rays on my arm at the
finish line.  quel surpris- sustain injury to my arm while running a
marathon.  ok- am off.  just wanted to make sure you guys were alive and
well and i haven't been blacklisted....
e

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp


Thanks.  Anyone there you would recommend as a point of contact/entry?

Best,
Jeff

-----Original Message-----
From: Severin Borenstein [mailto:borenste@haas.berkeley.edu]
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 11:54 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: RE: consulting firm?

On Thu, 1 Nov 2001, Dasovich, Jeff wrote:

> That's the price of fame.  The name of the firm where she's applying at
> is Cornerstone Research. Does that firm ring a bell?

Cornerstone is a pretty good place.  I haven't had any dealings with them
for a few years, but I know a number of people who have worked with them
and all were pretty positive.

Severin


[IMAGE]      We Wish You a Merry Christmas  [IMAGE]  Check out our most popular interactive holiday greetings! Looking for a sing-a-long?  Carolers and a  reindeer  with a glowing nose? A team of mischievous mice?  Our Christmas cards offer something for everyone, including the  catch-a-snowflake  game and  12 days  of Christmas.  Send these great cards plus many more from BlueMountain.com!            Celebrate Christmas with Blue Mountain [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  Christmas Sing-a-Long    Christmas Treats    All Through the House    Catch a Snowflake    12 Days of Christmas         Quick Gifts for Christmas  Blue Mountain offers gifts and gift certificates to save you time this season!  Brighten holiday tables with  flowers . Or include a gift certificate from  GiveAnything.com  with your eCard and let the recipient choose their own gift. Quick Gifts are only a click  away in the  Blue Mountain Gift Center !  [IMAGE]      We hope you enjoyed this edition of the Scoop! When you recently sent a Blue Mountain eCard, you agreed to receive email newsletters from us. If you do not want to receive future newsletters, please send an email with 'remove' in the Subject line to: unsubscribe_bma@maildb.bluemountainarts.com        ? 1996-2001 1996-2001 EGCB, Inc. All rights reserved. Blue Mountain, Blue Mountain Arts, and the Blue Mountain logo are service marks or registered service marks of BMA Holdings, LLC in the United States and other countries. Terms of Service  |  Privacy Policy        	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]


Kathy,

I am attaching a copy of the NGPL that was reported as of this morning.  If
you look at the by Trader P&L, we are off from your spreadsheet by
approximately $3.6 million USD for December and approximately $7.6million
year to date.  The $7.6 consists of the December variance and the $4 million
variance that we discussed earlier (originations).  However, I spoke with the
Chris Able from the Controls group, what we are reporting for originations
and for Canadian p&l ties to the DPR.   This leads me to believe that either
our number already includes the origination adjustment or the origination
adjustment was never made to the DPR.  To help resolve the December variance,
I have added a tab to your file to show what we have reported each day for
December.

Remember the p&l we are reporting by trader excludes originations.  Give me a
call when you have time and we can try to resolve these variances.

Thanks,
Robin

Kathy Reeves
12/07/2000 06:46 PM
To: Robin Rodrigue/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Canada p&l

Robin
I would like to make sure before year end that the p&l being reporting for
Canada ( trading profits only) equals what I think it is as per attached:

Would you let me know what you are currently reporting for Canada.

Thanks
Kathy


Just as I suspected.  I showed the attached email to Mark Taylor, and he says
he still wants to send out confirms, so if Dynegy wants to just throw them
out, that's their business, but keep sending them as you would in the normal
course of business.

	Larry Joe Hunter
	01/08/2001 04:22 PM

		 To: Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jean
Bell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: DYNEGY DIRECT

Stephanie,

We currently do a couple of deals per day through an Online trading system
called DynegyDirect.  This is basically Dynegy's version of EOL.  We are
sending Confirmations on these deals just as we do with all other deals done
with Dynegy.  However, the CP is requesting that we not send these Confirms
at all.  Our Traders click on the deal which is then legally binding.  Our
back office personnel double-check our Trade Entry by going to DynegyDirect's
web-site and checking the trade details.  Dynegy simply throws out our
Confirmations once they determine it relates to a DynegyDirect deal.  I have
told the CP that I would check with our legal dept about the status of
sending Confirmations traded on DynegyDirect.

Let me know if you can get someone to comment on this.

thanks,
Joe

---------------------- Forwarded by Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT on 01/08/2001
04:06 PM ---------------------------

Jean Bell
01/08/2001 03:37 PM
To: Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: DYNEGY DIRECT

Dynegy is wanting to know if we can show "Dynegy Direct" on our confirms in
the same way that we show "EOL".    Dynegy has two separate systems, one for
Dynegy Direct and one for their 'daily' work, and because no confirms are
signed and returned or sent out,  our confirms are confusing when they do not
find them in their system.  Thanks.


Greetings, i am pleased to ask for help on any of the buffalo bayou
spectrum development!a.wortham theater;b.sabine st. playground;c.bayou
bend/rainbow lodge;d. el mercado/metro park &ride
picture: trams ;bike buggies;golfcart trails;quiet non polluting modes
of transportation,.
thankyou in advance, it is our priviledge to be at your service.
best regards, j.c. freeman

Received: from mail5.registeredsite.com (mail5.registeredsite.com
[209.35.159.17]) by ogopogo.flash.net (8.9.3/Pro-8.9.3) with ESMTP id
QAA03192 for <freeair@flash.net>; Sat, 9 Dec 2000 16:09:07 -0600 (CST)
Received: from mail.worldfan.com (mail.worldfans.com [209.35.96.188]) by
mail5.registeredsite.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id FAA14321 for
<freeair@flash.net>; Sat, 9 Dec 2000 05:08:32 -0500
Received: from SMTP32-FWD by mail.worldfan.com  (SMTP32) id A00000172; Sat,
9 Dec 2000 17:08:58 -0500
Received: from ogopogo.flash.net [209.30.2.14] by mail.worldfan.com with
ESMTP  (SMTPD32-6.00) id AD782A900CC; Sat, 09 Dec 2000 17:08:56 -0500
Received: from flash.net (208-194-194-233.flash.net [208.194.194.233]) by
ogopogo.flash.net (8.9.3/Pro-8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA00093; Sat, 9 Dec 2000
16:06:22 -0600 (CST)
Message-ID: <3A325625.1E8EC6E3@flash.net>
Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2000 15:56:21 +0000
From: jc freeman <freeair@flash.net>
Reply-To: JC@worldfan.com
Organization: worldfan.com
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: en,fr-CA,es
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cnf@swbell.net, jc@worldfan.com
Subject: boat rides on bayou!
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------A1AEFA39F5E0903256BEBEBA"
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000

hey dude it could be a real diversion!

 - T12927.pdf


Scott,
I received your attached letter reflecting your "out-of-scope" expenditure for the fatal flaw analysis.  I am amazed that you spent $10,000.00 more than you were authorized (authorized amount $8,500.00).  I have passed along your invoice for the contracted $8,500.00 to our development group and at present have no authorization to approve any amount over that commitment.  When the Commercial guys have contracts with shippers and we are ready to move ahead on the environmental resource reports for the FERC filing, we can talk about the overage at that time.  However, I am not sure recovery will be possible.  Until then, I'm afraid I have no further authorization.  John Shafer

-----Original Message-----
From: Patti, Scott [mailto:SPatti@ensr.com]
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 1:22 PM
To: Shafer, John
Cc: Hackney, Phil; Schmidt, Jon
Subject: Additional Budget Authorization Request

John,

Please see the attached budget authorization request letter and call me with
any questions or concerns you may have.  Thank you,

Scott

Scott J. Patti
Senior Project Manager
ENSR International
1601 Prospect Parkway
Fort Collins, CO  80525
Phone: (970) 493-8878
Fax:     (970) 493-0213
Email:  spatti@ensr.com
 <<Authorization Request.doc>>

**********************************************************************
The information contained in this communication is confidential and
privileged proprietary information intended only for the individual
or entity to whom it is addressed.  Any unauthorized use, distribution,
copying or disclosure of this communication is prohibited.
If you have received this communication in error, please contact the
sender immediately.

It is our policy that e-mails are intended for and should be used for
business purposes only.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

ENSR
www.ensr.com
postmaster@ensr.com
**********************************************************************


Beginning Monday, March 26, 2001 there will be a daily "Campaign Leadership
Call".  This conference call was referenced in a memo sent via e:mail by Rick
this afternoon, Friday, March 23.  Please remember to mark your calendars
accordingly.

Date:  Daily, beginning Monday, March 26, 2001

Time:  11:30am - 12:00pm (CST) call to last 1/2 hour

Number: 1-800-283-1805

Location: EB4701 (for those in Houston)

Feel free to call me if you have any additional questions or concerns.

gngr
713-853-7751


I sense the need for an all hands call tomorrow to discuss this. I have a 11 - 12 but am available after that. How about 1 PM central?
--------------------------
Ben Jacoby
(713) 853-6173


Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 11:51:34 -0500
From: "Lane Grigsby" <LaneG@cajunusa.com>
To: <01-035@cajunusa.com>,<01-055@cajunusa.com>, <01-056@cajunusa.com>,	<01-110@cajunusa.com>, <01-156@cajunusa.com>,	<01-211@cajunusa.com>, <02-015@cajunusa.com>,	<02-025@cajunusa.com>, <02-025PIX@cajunusa.com>,	<AaronJ@cajunusa.com>, <AlanP@cajunusa.com>,	<AlexK@cajunusa.com>, <AmyB@cajunusa.com>, <AmyS@cajunusa.com>,	<AndrewB@cajunusa.com>, <AndrewL@cajunusa.com>,	<AshleyS@cajunusa.com>, <BeauW@cajunusa.com>,	<BobE@cajunusa.com>, <BobT@cajunusa.com>,	<BrookeJ@cajunusa.com>, <CarissaB@cajunusa.com>,	<CarltonJ@cajunusa.com>, <CCDALME@cajunusa.com>,	<CharlesC@cajunusa.com>, <CheriC@cajunusa.com>,	<ChipD@cajunusa.com>, <ChipM@cajunusa.com>,	<ClintB@cajunusa.com>, <DaleC@cajunusa.com>,	<DaleL@cajunusa.com>, <DanaB@cajunusa.com>,	<DavidC@cajunusa.com>, <DavidP@cajunusa.com>,	<DonF@cajunusa.com>, <DonnaS@cajunusa.com>,	<ErinG@cajunusa.com>, <ErnieK@cajunusa.com>,	<EuclidM@cajunusa.com>, <FritzE@cajunusa.com>,	<GeorgeB@cajunusa.com>, <HannahA@cajunusa.com>,	<HurleyH@cajunusa.com>, <JameyS@cajunusa.com>,	<JanL@cajunusa.com>, <JeniG@cajunusa.com>,	<JimmyN@cajunusa.com>, <JoeyF@cajunusa.com>,	<JulieR@cajunusa.com>, <KaciF@cajunusa.com>,	<KarenP@cajunusa.com>, <KarminC@cajunusa.com>,	<KeithW@cajunusa.com>, <KenJ@cajunusa.com>,	<KevinG@cajunusa.com>, <KimJ@cajunusa.com>,	<LaneG@cajunusa.com>, <LeeM@cajunusa.com>,	<MarkL@cajunusa.com>, <MarshallZ@cajunusa.com>,	<MartyB@cajunusa.com>, <MaryR@cajunusa.com>,	<MatthewM@cajunusa.com>, <MichelleG@cajunusa.com>,	<MikeB@cajunusa.com>, <MikeBa@cajunusa.com>,	<MikeC@cajunusa.com>, <MikeL@cajunusa.com>,	<MikeM@cajunusa.com>, <MissyG@cajunusa.com>,	<NancyB@cajunusa.com>, <PaulN@cajunusa.com>,	<PaulR@cajunusa.com>, <RalphB@cajunusa.com>,	<ReneeL@cajunusa.com>, <RoyM@cajunusa.com>,	<RustyD@cajunusa.com>, <ScottM@cajunusa.com>,	<ShaneP@cajunusa.com>, <SherrieC@cajunusa.com>,	<SherryBIE@cajunusa.com>, <SherylR@cajunusa.com>,	<StuartC@cajunusa.com>, <TamiL@cajunusa.com>,	<TessaLa@cajunusa.com>, <TiffanyA@cajunusa.com>,	<TimW@cajunusa.com>, <ToddG@cajunusa.com>,	<ToddM@cajunusa.com>, <ToddP@cajunusa.com>,	<ToddS@cajunusa.com>, <TomC@cajunusa.com>, <TomH@cajunusa.com>,	<TommyH@cajunusa.com>, <TomW@cajunusa.com>,	<TomyeC@cajunusa.com>, <troyl@cajunusa.com>,	<VickyL@cajunusa.com>, <WayneH@cajunusa.com>,	<WillL@cajunusa.com>, <WillM@cajunusa.com>
Subject: Thoughtful comments
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline

Dear Friends,
The following was sent to me by my friend Tamim Ansary.  Tamim is an
Afghani-American writer.  He is also one of the most brilliant people I
know in this life.  When he writes, I read.  When he talks, I listen.
Here is his take on Afghanistan and the whole mess we are in.

Dear friend and whoever else is on this email thread:
I've been hearing a lot of talk about "bombing Afghanistan back to the
Stone Age." Ronn Owens, on KGO Talk Radio today, allowed that this would
mean killing innocent people, people who had nothing to do with this
atrocity, but "we're at war, we have to accept collateral damage. What
else can we do?"  Minutes later I heard some TV pundit discussing whether
we "have the belly to do what must be done."
And I thought about the issues being raised especially hard because I am
from Afghanistan, and even though I've lived here for 35 years I've never
lost track of what's going on there. So I want to tell anyone who will
listen how it all looks from where I'm standing.
I speak as one who hates the Taliban and Osama Bin Laden. There is no
doubt in my mind that these people were responsible for the atrocity in
New York. I agree that something must be done about those monsters.
But the Taliban and Ben Laden are not Afghanistan.  They're not even the
government of Afghanistan.  The Taliban are a cult of ignorant psychotics
who took over Afghanistan in 1997. Bin Laden is a political criminal with
a plan.  When you think Taliban, think Nazis. When you think Bin Laden,
think Hitler. And when you think "the people of Afghanistan" think "the
Jews in the concentration camps."   It's not only that the Afghan people
had nothing to do with this atrocity. They were the first victims of the
perpetrators. They would exult if someone would come in there, take out
the Taliban and clear out the rats nest of international thugs holed up in
their country. Some say, why don't the Afghans rise up and overthrow the
Taliban? The answer is, they're starved, exhausted, hurt, incapacitated,
suffering.  A few years ago, the United Nations estimated that there are
500,000 disabled orphans in Afghanistan-a country with no economy, no
food.  There are millions of widows.  And the Taliban has been burying
these widows alive in mass graves.  The soil is littered with land mines,
the farms were all destroyed by the Soviets.  These are a few of the
reasons why the Afghan people have not overthrown the Taliban.
We come now to the question of bombing Afghanistan back to the Stone
Age.
Trouble is, that's been done. The Soviets took care of it already.
Make the Afghans suffer? They're already suffering. Level their houses?
Done. Turn their schools into piles of rubble? Done.  Eradicate their
hospitals? Done. Destroy their infrastructure? Cut them off from medicine
and
health care? Too late. Someone already did all that. New bombs would only
stir
the rubble of earlier bombs.  Would they at least get the Taliban? Not
likely.
In today's Afghanistan, only the Taliban eat, only they have the means to
move around.
They'd slip away and hide. Maybe the bombs would get some of those disabled
orphans,
they don't move too fast, they don't even have wheelchairs. But flying over

Kabul and dropping bombs wouldn't really be a strike against the criminals
who did this horrific thing. Actually it would only be making common cause
with the Taliban-by raping once again the people they've been raping all
this time
So what else is there? What can be done, then? Let me now speak with true
fear and trembling. The only way to get Bin Laden is to go in there with
ground troops. When people speak of "having the belly to do what needs to
be done" they're thinking in terms of having the belly to kill as many as
needed.  Having the belly to overcome any moral qualms about killing
innocent people. Let's pull our heads out of the sand. What's actually on
the table is Americans dying. And not just because some Americans would
die fighting their way through Afghanistan to Bin Laden's hideout. It's
much bigger than that folks. Because to get any troops to Afghanistan,
we'd have to go through Pakistan. Would they let us? Not likely. The
conquest of Pakistan would have to be first. Will other Muslim nations
just stand by? You see where I'm going. We're flirting with a world war
between Islam and the West.
And guess what: that's Bin Laden's program. That's exactly what he wants.
That's why he did this.  Read his speeches and statements. It's all right
there.  He really believes Islam would beat the west. It might seem
ridiculous, but he figures if he can polarize the world into Islam and the
West, he's got a billion soldiers.  If the west wreaks a holocaust in
those lands, that's a billion people with nothing left to lose, that's
even better from Bin Laden's point of view.  He's probably wrong, in the
end the west would win, whatever that would mean, but the war would last
for years and millions would die, not just theirs but ours. Who has the
belly for that? Bin Laden does. Anyone else?

Tamim Ansary


Sheila:  I just received the package from Simmons.  Will you please send your
request to the usual suspects?  Thanks.

Sam:  Will you please track this agreement on Lotus Notes?  Thanks.


----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 12/18/2000 02:02 PM -----

	"Woertz, Byron" <BWoertz@caiso.com>
	Sent by: "Grant, Colleen" <CGrant@caiso.com>
	12/18/2000 01:41 PM
	Please respond to "Sole, Jeanne"

		 To: ISO Market Participants
<IMCEAEX-_O=CAISO_OU=CORPORATE_CN=DISTRIBUTION+20LISTS_CN=ISO+20MARKET+20PARTI
CIPANTS@caiso.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: CAISO NOTICE: Bureau of State Audits supoena and document reques t

Market Participants and Scheduling Coordinators:

On December 4, 2000, the ISO provided notice regarding the subpoena and
document request it received from the Bureau of State Audits ("Bureau") for
information that is confidential under ISO Tariff Section 20.3.2.  This
notices requests Market Participants to treat the detailed data request
issued by the State Auditor as confidential.  In addition this notice
updates Market Participants on the ISO's schedule for compliance with the
State Auditor's subpoena and data request.

The December 4 notice included a detailed data request.  The State Auditor
has informed the ISO that it considers the detailed data request to be a
confidential document and has asked the ISO to inform Market Participants
that received the detailed data request that they should treat the document
as confidential.  The ISO hereby informs Market Participants on behalf of
the State Auditor that the detailed data request should be treated as a
confidential document.

The December 4 notice indicated that the ISO will seek protection for
information subject to Section 20.3.4 under the Confidentiality Agreement
executed by the ISO and the Bureau. The notice requested that any concerns
relating to the Bureau's subpoena and/or document request be communicated to
the ISO by 9:00 a.m., December 8th. In response to the notice, several
market participants have objected to disclosure of confidential information
to the Bureau.

Section 20.3.4 of the ISO Tariff provides, in pertinent part, that: "The
Market Participant may, at its sole discretion and own cost, direct any
challenge to or defense against the disclosure requirement and the ISO shall
cooperate with such affected Market Participant to the maximum extent
practicable to minimize disclosure of the information consistent with
applicable law." In accordance with that provision, objecting Market
Participants have the responsibility to pursue more restrictive
confidentiality protections to the extent they are disatisfied with the
protections in place.  Accordingly, the ISO through this notice places
Market Participant's on notice that it will release confidential information
requested by the State Auditor by the end of this week, if it does not
receive an order to the contrary from a Court or the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission by close of business Thursday December 21.

The Bureau contact related to the subpoena and document request is Sharon
Smagala who can be reached at (916) 445-0255 or sharons@bsa.ca.gov.

Generally, Market Participants wishing to contact the ISO in regard to the
State Auditor request should direct  correspondence and calls to Beth Ann
Burns at 916-608-7146 bburns@caiso.com <mailto:bburns@caiso.com>   with
copies to Charlie Robinson at crobinson@caiso.com
<mailto:crobinson@caiso.com>  and Norma Formanek at nformanek@fbm.com
<mailto:nformanek@fbm.com> .   This week, due to holiday vacations, Market
Participants should contact Jeanne Sol, 916-608-7144 jsole@caiso.com
<mailto:jsole@caiso.com>  with copies to Beth Ann Burns,  bburns@caiso.com
<mailto:bburns@caiso.com> , Charlie Robinson at crobinson@caiso.com
<mailto:crobinson@caiso.com>  and Norma Formanek at nformanek@fbm.com
<mailto:nformanek@fbm.com> .

Jeanne M. Sol,
Regulatory Counsel
California ISO
(916) 608-7144
____________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________

The Foregoing e-Mail Communication (Together With Any Attachments Thereto)
Is Intended For The Designated Recipient(s) Only. Its Terms May Be
Confidential And Protected By Attorney/Client Privilege or Other Applicable
Privileges.  Unauthorized Use, Dissemination, Distribution, Or Reproduction
Of This Message Is Strictly Prohibited.


Hi to all,

Just an update on the Family Cookbook that I hope to have done by the next
reunion.  Here's what I have so far.  Can everyone who's last name starts
with an S please send in a recipe to me by next Friday?

Staab Recipes

SOUPS
    Chili
    Danish Potato
    String Bean and Dumpling
NOODLES and DUMPLINGS
    Fried Sauerkraut and Dumplings
    Knibble and Kdubble
    Noodles and Tomatoes
BREADS
    Banana Bread Like No Other
APPETIZERS
    Barbecued Shrimp
    Bruchetta with Tomatoes
    Hamburger Pizza Buns
    Sausage Bread
    Stuffed Vienna Bread
    Ugly Dip
DESSERTS
    Moon Cake
    Pumpkin Cookies
BEVERAGES
    Strawberry Lemonade
SALADS
    Crab Pasta Salad
MAIN DISHES or MEATS
    Chicken Enchiladas
SAUCES

I am still getting an error on Steve Staab and Sonny Staabs email address.
Could I have one person send me a correction please?
Westlake@idcomm.com, (Steve Staab), PaulStaab@yahoo.com (Sonny Staab).

Everyone please have a Happy and Safe Halloween!

Thanks,
Becky Cookson


Great.  Probably Mike, me, Rick Bergsieker and a few others.  Thanks.  Jeff

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Clayton Seigle                           11/16/2000 10:11 AM

To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: saudi

i'm in nyc at a conference, and yesterday there was an excellent presentation
on foreign investment in saudi arabia.  please let me know if anyone in EGM
should be briefed on what was said there.

thanks


-----Original Message-----
From: Robertson, Linda
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 2:41 PM
To: Kean, Steven J.; Shapiro, Richard
Subject: FW: one more impt name

-----Original Message-----
From: Jack Quinn [mailto:JQuinn@QuinnGillespie.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 2:39 PM
To: Robertson, Linda
Subject: one more impt name

tom green from sidley & austin -- fabulous.


Start Date: 4/26/01; HourAhead hour: 20;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042620.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/26/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: CISO_EPMI_DESERT
  ENGY_TYPE: NFRM


The Enron Center Garage has opened.

Employees who work for business units that are scheduled to move to the new building and are currently parking in an Enron Contract garage you are being offered a parking space in the new Enron Center garage.

This is the only offer you will receive during the initial migration to the new garage. Spaces will be filled on a first come first served basis. The cost for the new garage will be the same as Allen Center garage which is currently $165.00 per month, less the company subsidy, leaving a monthly employee cost of $94.00.

If you choose not to accept this offer at this time, you may add your name to the Enron Center garage waiting list at a later day and offers will be made as spaces become available.

The  Sky Ring  that connects the garage and both buildings will not be opened until summer 2001. All initial parkers will have to use the street level entrance to Enron Center North until  Sky Ring access is available. Garage stairways next to the elevator lobbies at each floor may be used as an exit in the event of elevator trouble.

If you are interested in accepting this offer, please reply via email to Parking and Transportation as soon as you reach a decision. Following your email, arrangements will be made for you to turn in your old parking card and receive a parking transponder along with a an information packet for the new garage.

The Parking and Transportation desk may be reached via email at Parking and Transportation/Corp/Enron or 713-853-7060  with any questions.


Dale will call you this afternoon.

DS

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ratliff, Dale
Sent:	Friday, July 27, 2001 11:50 AM
To:	Schoolcraft, Darrell
Subject:


Response to Tarpey on Schnitzer/Tierney (303)575-6491
Thorn--Linda Breathitt
Mont Hoyt
Set up meeting with Dan Richard, Rick and maureen


Here is the draft.  Comments please.  Due today at 5pm.

Jim


Daren,

I hate to be a pest but here's the deal on the above two meters:

98-1600  Sitara deal #159194 expired on 2/29/2000.  The flow for 2/2000 was
on the 215K.  This meter (del.) flowed 53.863 for 3/2000.  There is no   new
deal referenced, nor is the evergreen flag in effect.

98-6725  Sitara deal #214948 expired 3/27/2000.  No evergreen and no new deal
referenced.  This is a little premature but this meter is active   monthly
and I'm thinking that it will flow for this month with no K being applied.

Thanks
-Jackie-
3-9497


You forget that I have a sister-in-law with many single women friends beyond
the age of 30 who actually have attempted to change their dating luck with
this book.  I think the very fact they read/apply this book is a great
indication of why they are still unattached.  Everybody knows the fastest way
to a man's heart is through espn and college football the prerequisite being
of course the lady has the Southern charm/accent, blonde hair and preferably
blue eyes (but hazel will do in a pinch assuming everything else is there).
See, men are not that selective or demanding.


Thank you.  Can you also address the question about gda physical volumes not
showing up in my position manager?  Let me know.

Mike


Kathleen,

Is everything ok?  I hope you are just having a nice day to yourself.  What
perfect weather!

Kay


Hi Karen,

Attached is the spreadsheet containing the Chilean pulp and paper mills.

The info is all taken from RISI

Monika


Hi Jeff,

I have been wanting to e-mail you to meet up for lunch, now that I am in the city.  I know you are super busy, but let me know if you have time.  The only day that is not good is Tuesday - I have an aerobics class at 1 with a gay drill sergeant - he's great!  He dances around the class yelling at us.

Also, we are planning a trip to Tahoe the weekend of Dec 15th to celebrate graduation.  I know you're not, but let me know if you want to come.

take care and hope to see you soon,
Jackie

-----Original Message-----
From:	Dasovich, Jeff [SMTP:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com]
Sent:	Wednesday, October 10, 2001 7:36 AM
To:	Kelly, Jacqueline
Subject:	Hello Out There

Hey, I haven't seen you at all and have been thinking about you.  Just wanted to check in and see how things are going.  Hope you are well and things are going swimmingly.

Best,
Jeff

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


?

?http://www.nationalreview.com/kopel/kopel110900.shtml
 - Dave Kopel on NRO.url


Carolyn,

GE is calling for the original turbine contract.  I believe I previously
provided Lee Johnson's address.  Could you send him an original?

Thanks,

Kay


-----Original Message-----
From: 	"Btu" <subs@btu.net>@ENRON
Sent:	Friday, December 07, 2001 4:44 PM
To:	"Btu Weekly" <>@ENRON
Subject:	Btu Weekly

Attached is the latest issue of Btu Weekly

e-mail: info@Btu.net
phone: 732-758-8222
fax: 732-758-8286

 - wg121001.pdf


Call me about this
----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 11/06/2000 07:21 AM -----

	"Tetrault, Charles D." <ctetrault@velaw.com>
	11/04/2000 05:15 PM

		 To: "Richard B. Sanders (E-mail)" <Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: VPP

I've never heard from Linda Guinn regarding the volumetric production
payment press release issue.

Charles D. Tetrault
Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.
1455 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20004-1008
ctetrault@velaw.com
202.639.6551 [voice]
202.639.6604 [fax]

          ++++++CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE+++++
The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged.  This
email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization
named above.  If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized
representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any,
or the information contained herein is prohibited.  If you have received
this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email
and delete this email from your system.  Thank You


---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Neal/HOU/ECT on 02/06/2001 10:06 AM
---------------------------

"Butch Butcher" <butch@watsonmoving.com> on 02/01/2001 10:52:48 AM
To: <efalldr@aol.com>, <rkgbh@aol.com>, <stehrfamily@aol.com>,
<jbyrd@byrdinterior.com>, <sneal@enron.com>, <letenhave@freewwweb.com>,
<troy_utz@ml.com>, <rhancock@nmhn-law.com>, <joe_a_hays@oxy.com>,
<david_m_benninger@reliantenergy.com>, <Jimmy.Daggett@ST-Systems.com>,
<paul.stehr@stdreg.com>, <marks@stes.com>, <Delozier.S-Don@usa.conoco.com>,
"Butch Butcher" <Butch@watsonmoving.com>
cc:
Subject: February Campout Feb. 16-18, 2001

Ya-te-hey:

Its time to break out the tents and sleeping bags for a campout at Brazos
Bend State Park , Feb. 16-18.

We have reserved three campsites for the weekend, mark your calendars for
this special time together with our young braves and I will follow-up with
details later next week.

In the meantime, if you have questions, call me at: 281. 541.1878 (cell) or
281.497.6612 (home).

Ya-te-hey!
Butch "Big Bear" Butcher


Hi guys

I need some advice.

Sharad is in the process of finding differences between your and our versions
of Exotica.  At some point we will need to migrate London office over to your
more up-to-date version, and I'm concerned that there may be RAC-style
implications.  I'm in favour of using the IT testers to carry out formal
regression testing, and they are apparently able to do this.

Do we need to get our heads together to "form a view" before we involve RAC
or the business groups?

Anjam tells Sharad that London Exotica was built using Excel 95, and that
neither he nor Zimin knows how to build/compile the XLA using later versions
of Excel.  Is this true?  If so, then we need to migrate to XLLs sooner
rather than later because of the maintenance implications.

Steve


Since our department has grown, we have realized the need to add 3 new temporary IDs.  Following the instructions below, please add calendar access rights for EWS Legal Temp IDs 9, 10, and 11 (as show in blue below). While doing this, would you mind checking the other IDs as well to be sure they are listed.  When logging in temporaries we have discovered that some access rights work with some temp IDs, but not all.  Thank you!
================================
For Outlook users only!

Since we have migrated to Outlook, we have not been able to give calendar/e-mail access to the temporaries filling in for our department.  Apparently, the access rights we all had set up in Lotus Notes cannot be migrated to Outlook.  Thus, we need all attorneys and specialists to give access rights to all the department Temporary IDs as soon as possible.  You can control how much access you would like to give, and for what.  For example, you could give full revision access to your calendar and read-only for your e-mail or access only to your calendar and no access to your e-mail.  It's up to you.

Please give access to the following IDs:
EWS Legal Temp 1
EWS Legal Temp 2
EWS Legal Temp 3
EWS Legal Temp 4
EWS Legal Temp 5
EWS Legal Temp 6
Note:  Do not use-Temp 7 is not designated for our temporaries.
EWS Legal Temp 8
EWS Legal Temp 9
EWS Legal Temp 10
EWS Legal Temp 11

To set up access:
1.	Right click on "Outlook Today" at the top of the folders list (if your folders list is not visible, click on "View" and
	then "Folder List")

2.	Left Click on "Properties" at the bottom of the list that pops up

3.	Left click on the "Permissions" tab

4.	Left click on "Add".
	Type "EWS"-the address list will stop on our temp IDs.
	Left click on one of the Temp ID you are adding, left click on the "Add" button.  Repeat for each ID.  (Be careful not
	to add EWS Temp ID 7.  This is not used for our temporaries.)
	Left Click "OK"

5. 	You should now be back in the "properties" box.  Select the first ID you just added, hold down the "Shift" key, then
	left click all the other ID's.  With all IDs now selected and not holding the Shift key down, click in the boxes which
	access you would like to allow the temporaries to have.  (Note:  Do not select anything that has "own" or "owner"
	in it as you are the owner.)  Left Click on "Apply", then "OK".

6.	Right click on your "Calendar" folder and repeat steps 2-5 above.

7.	[Optional].  To give access to e-mail or any other folders you may have, right click on that folder and repeat steps
	 2-5 above.

Regarding the Legal Temp IDs, these set-up instructions need to be completed only once. If your Assistant ever changes, these instructions will come in handy!
Thank you for your time and patience.


Tina,
Koch never returned my calls. Based on the contractual information, we may be
putting ourselves in a risk area by 'assigning' the deals without proper
documentation. The documentation that was supplied did not refence any ENA
agreements, nor any specific meter numbers. If the purchase was indeed a
meter/well sale; there should be documentation listing the meters acquired
and the effective date. Since we are apparently the supplier, the risk is not
as substaintial as if we were the purchaser. However, without documentation
we are basically relying on the relationship btw Koch & Duke.

Cyndie
ENA Global Contracts

Tina Valadez@ECT
10/16/2000 11:50 AM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Cyndie Balfour-Flanagan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kristen J Hanson/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Koch Midstream Services Co

Please change the Sitara tickets dating back to January 2000 and let me know
when you are finished.

Thank You,
Tina Valadez

Daren J Farmer
10/16/2000 11:15 AM
To: Tina Valadez/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Carlos J Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kristen J Hanson/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Koch Midstream Services Co

Since Koch has told you that they sold the properties to Duke, I would say
that Duke should be paying us for the gas.

I had heard that Koch sold the properties to another counterparty, but I
wasn't sure to whom.  I either talked or left a message with someone in the
settlements area about two months ago about this after Koch informed the
trader that they should not be getting the invoices.  However, I never heard
back from anyone.

This is related to the CES acquisition which came online the first of this
year.  The deal info we had at the time had this sale booked to Koch.  I can
change the tickets in Sitara to the Duke counterparty (or create new tickets)
today if you need me to, so that we can get the invoice out the door.  You
will still need to coordinate with the contract group in getting the correct
contract in place for the deal.

D

Tina Valadez
10/10/2000 10:18 AM
To: Carlos J Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kristen J Hanson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Koch Midstream Services Co

I have been billing Koch Midstream Services Co under ENA for meters
LL-1-0030-Comitas (Sitara #144052) and LL-1-0027-Volpe (Sitara #144049).  My
former accounting contact at Koch, Michael Thomas, said that Koch sold these
south texas assets to Duke Energy Field Services back in 1999.  Michael faxed
a contract which I forwarded to Cindy Balfour Flannigan in the contract
area.  Cindy said she can't tie the deals in the contract to our system so
she can't recognize the assignment.  Cindy has left messages with Koch, but
she has not been able to resolve the issue.    Koch is refusing to pay for
the gas and there is currently over a million dollars outstanding relating to
these deals.  I need to find out whether Koch or Duke is responsible for
paying for this gas.  Do you have any information regarding this issue?

Thanks,
Tina Valadez
3-7548

---------------------- Forwarded by Tina Valadez/HOU/ECT on 10/10/2000 10:03
AM ---------------------------

	From:  Ami Chokshi @ ENRON                           10/09/2000 02:47 PM

To: Tina Valadez/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

Tina,

With regards ti the Koch Midstream, you could talk to Daren Farmer about it.
Also, Carlos Rodriguez could help.

Ami


Here's an update:

- We received detailed comments back from them on Monday, as reqd.
- We discussed these w/them, our legal and Morgan on Tues to clarify some items.
- Called them today to officially kill based mainly on the fact that in their response they had pulled the gathering system out of the collateral pool and proposed putting the gathered crude to the refinery at market rather than cost. This is a reduction of $5MM/yr in earnings and $10-15MM in collateral.
- After quite a bit of discussion today, it's clear they still want to get the deal done and are willing to revert back to having the gathered crude in at cost and as part of the collateral. The major issue is trying to find a structure in which they have some upside in the transaction beyond just the locked 1.4 coverage.

So...I said that if we get something in writing that puts gathering back in and satisfies our other reqmts, we will then try to revise the structure to give them a little more upside. Norman is traveling tomorrow and will get us something on Monday.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maffett, Randal
Sent:	Thursday, October 18, 2001 3:25 PM
To:	Mcconnell, Mike; Shankman, Jeffrey A.; Nowlan Jr., John L.
Cc:	Robison, Michael A.; O'Connor, Randy; Byargeon, W. Tom
Subject:	Project OZ update

Below is a summary of my discussion w/ Norman Abood (General Counsel for GAF) in response to our termination letter dated 10/16/01 and his written response on 10/17.  Basically, I told Norman it was time to stop the paper trail and either get down to closing or go our separate ways.  I emphasized our primary concerns as follows:

	1.  GAF's ability to fund its equity
	2.  finalizing the feedstock supply and products off-take
	3.  Morgan's commitment to finance the debt
	4.  defining the pool of assets to be collateralized
	5.  evidence of insurability, and
	6.  restructuring of GAF's PSA w/ Farmland.

I also emphasized our frustration over the "continually moving targets" (debt, collateral, equity, feedstocks, etc...) and told him I will NOT continue to expend resources and time playing games.  Finally, I told him I was willing to re-engage on the following terms:

	a.  GAF submit either a written set of comments to our 9/21 MOU or a counter-proposal to us by Monday, 10/22.
	b.  If, subject to OUR review and based on US believing there's merit to proceed that we get ALL PARTIES (GAF, 	     Morgan Stanley and EGM) together and hammer out a definitive and final version of the MOU including, but not 		     limited to the primary concerns above (w/ all parties having "subject to senior management and/or Board approval" 	     language/conditions).  The purpose here is to get all the T&C down in writing with everyone in the room in 	     conceptual agreement which will make it more difficult for the targets to move.
	c.  Morgan Stanley must be willing to sign some form of commitment letter evidencing their willingness to finance the 	     transaction.

GAF will then have some finite/specific period of time in which to approach Farmland and restructure their deal as necessary to close the transaction.

Norman agreed in principle and committed to get back to us by tomorrow.  Hopefully, this will once and for all define whether or not this deal can get done.

Randy Maffett
Vice President - Enron Global Markets
Office:     (713)853-3212
e-mail:     randal.maffett@enron.com

Assistant:     Beth Ryan (713)345-7161
                  beth.a.ryan@enron.com


Billy, great idea, if you have a list i would really like to send them an
email.
Thanks,
mike

PS good luck with the game on friday.

Billy Lemmons@ENRON
11/21/2000 09:13 PM
To: Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Chairman's Award Nominations

Mike,

Is this something that you and Jeff are interested in doing for the EGM
nominees?  The list Brian attached below for Frevert includes only ENA
employees.  Just let me know if I can do something to help.

Thanks,
Billy

---------------------- Forwarded by Billy Lemmons/Corp/Enron on 11/21/2000
09:09 PM ---------------------------

Brian Redmond@ECT
11/15/2000 02:59 PM
To: Mark Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, Billy
Lemmons/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Chairman's Award Nominations

Dave/Mark:

I have attached a list of the ENA/EGM/EIM employees nominated for the
Chairman's Award.   Mark, could you send them a brief personal
congratulations email?

Thanks,
Brian
---------------------- Forwarded by Brian Redmond/HOU/ECT on 11/15/2000 02:44
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Lillian Carroll                           11/15/2000 02:05 PM

To: Brian Redmond/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Chairman's Award Nominations

Here is the list of nominated ENA employees:


Select rt.datevalue,DA.ZoneCode, DA.PeakOrOffPeak, DA.Price, RT.RTBID,RT.RTOffer,ISO.Inc, ISO.Dec

FROM
(select cadatetime,peakoroffpeak,zonecode,price
from west_spotindex
where cadatetime>'8/31/2001'
group by cadatetime,peakoroffpeak,zonecode,price) da,

(Select Lkp.DateValue, Lkp.Peakoroffpeak, RT.Entity, Avg(RT.Bid) RTBid, Avg(RT.Offer) RTOffer
From CA_HourlyBidOffer RT, LkpCalendar_Definitions Lkp
Where Lkp.DateTimeValue = RT.CADateTime
and lkp.datevalue>'8/31/2001'
Group By Lkp.DateValue, Lkp.PeakOrOffPeak, RT.Entity)RT,

(Select Lkp.DateValue, Lkp.PeakOrOffPeak, lkpzone.deliverypoint, avg(ISO.PriceInc) Inc, Avg(ISO.PriceDec) Dec
From LkpCalendar_Definitions Lkp, CA_ISOExPost10Price ISO, lkpCA_Zonecodes lkpzone
Where Lkp.DateTimeValue = ISO.CADateTime
and iso.zonecode = lkpzone.zonecode
and lkp.datevalue='9/1/2001'
Group By Lkp.DateValue, Lkp.PeakOrOffPeak, lkpzone.deliverypoint) ISO

WHERE DA.zonecode=RT.entity
And DA.zonecode=ISO.deliverypoint
and DA.cadatetime=RT.datevalue
and DA.cadatetime=ISO.datevalue
and DA.PeakorOffPeak=RT.PeakorOffPeak
and DA.PeakorOffPeak=ISO.PeakorOffPeak

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Platter, Phillip
Sent:	Thursday, September 27, 2001 3:22 PM
To:	Oh, John
Subject:

Select Lkp.DateValue, Lkp.YearNum, Lkp.MonthNum, Lkp.DayOfWeekName, DA..ZoneCode, DA.PeakOrOffPeak, DA.Price, RT.RTBID,RT.RTOffer,ISO.Inc, ISO.Dec
from(select cadatetime,peakoroffpeak,zonecode,price
from west_spotindex
where cadatetime>'8/31/2001'
group by cadatetime,peakoroffpeak,zonecode,price)da,
(Select Lkp.DateValue, Lkp.PeakOrOffPeak, RT.Entity, Avg(RT.Bid) RTBid, Avg(RT.Offer) RTOffer
From CA_HourlyBidOffer RT, LkpCalendar_Definitions Lkp
Where Lkp.DateTimeValue = RT.CADateTime
and lkp.datevalue>'8/31/2001'
Group By Lkp.DateValue, Lkp.PeakOrOffPeak, RT.Entity)RT,
(Select Lkp.DateValue, Lkp.PeakOrOffPeak, lkpzone.deliverypoint, avg(ISO.PriceInc) Inc, Avg(ISO.PriceDec) Dec
From LkpCalendar_Definitions Lkp, CA_ISOExPost10Price ISO, lkpCA_Zonecodes lkpzone
Where Lkp.DateTimeValue = ISO.CADateTime
and iso.zonecode = lkpzone.zonecode
and lkp.datevalue='9/1/2001'
Group By Lkp.DateValue, Lkp.PeakOrOffPeak, lkpzone.deliverypoint)ISO, LkpCalendar_Definitions lkp
Where DA.zonecode=RT.entity
And DA.zonecode=ISO.deliverypoint
and DA.cadatetime=RT.datevalue
and DA.cadatetime=ISO.datevalue
and DA.PeakorOffPeak=RT.PeakorOffPeak
and DA.PeakorOffPeak=ISO.PeakorOffPeak
and lkp.datevalue=da.cadatetime
and lkp.datevalue=rt.datevalue
and lkp.datevalue=iso.datevalue
ORDER BY LKP.DATEVALUE


I just noticed that ENA is still agent for CES and CEM on Transco.  If we no
longer have a need to be agent, I think we should terminate those agencies.
What do you think?


do you know the status?

   Kate Symes @ ECT                02/15/2001 06:20 PM

To: Kerri Thompson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: tfs

I'll have to ask Mike about this in the morning - he's in that conference for
the afternoon. It says 25 mw in his trade log.

Kerri Thompson@ENRON
02/15/2001 01:56 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: tfs

524175

broker has 50 mw


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 07/13/2000 04:26 PM -----

	Tom Moran
	07/13/2000 04:18 PM

		 To: Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri
Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Gillette/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Molly Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cynthia Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary G
Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Enron Europe Global Contracts and Facilities, Enron
Europe Global CounterParty, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bradley
Diebner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey Richardson/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: EOL Credit Responses 07/13/00

Please find attached Credit's EOL responses for 7/13/00.

Regards,
tm


Susan:
Great to hear from you. I have been back in England the last week. Things are
going along fine. I have quite a bit of work to be done in the forthcoming
weeks but nothing to intolerable. I find that if I keep up with it, things go
just fine. Spent some time prior to Christmastide in Sweden and Finland. I
figured it was time to see the family roots. Loved Stockholm but found
Helsinki to be a bit too close to St. Petersburg. Of all the places I have
visited as of late, Edinburgh and St. Andrews still have my heart though.
I am sorry to read that Enron has had more than its fair share of trouble.
Sure, the vindictive side of me likes to see some people suffer and for that
I feel bad, but what's worse are the folks who have families to support, etc.
I feel for them. I would very much like to hear of you possibilities in the
Northwest (Seattle?). You aren't going to work for the Russell Company or
some other institution up there are you? :)
If you need anything let me know. That's one are of the country that I DO
have connections with. How are things in the man department? Is this what
might be part of taking you there? As for me, Cara and I are doing fine,
though we are tired of sitting on planes for 10 hours at a time everytime we
want to see each other. Actually, I think we are getting really serious. I am
going to "talk" with her dad in February no less. Kind of scary but exciting
all the same. More on that later.
Well, That's enough of my rambling. As I indicated before, if you ever want
to come over you have a place to set your hat and if you need anything in
Portland or Seattle, let me know.
Best to you,
Tobin
p.s. please send your parents a greeting for me.
p.p.s. Guess "Who's Coming to Dinner?" No, not Sydney Potier, Ben Freeman.
Called me this week and wants a place to stay for the next couple of nights.
He arrives on Monday. More later.....


YOU GO, GIRL!!!