Jeff and Jeff--Pls keep me and Kathy Ringblom posted on whatever you find.
Thanks. DF

Jeffery Fawcett
09/05/2000 01:31 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES
cc: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: So Cal Edison Claims Withholding of Pipeline Capacity

Jeff,
Is it possible for TW to get a copy of the Edison filing at the CPUC?  While
the article [shown below] doesn't provide any details, I suspect Edison's
complaint echoes earlier allegations against El Paso regarding their sale of
the 1.2 Bcf/d block of capacity to their affiliate.  I don't think
Transwestern and/or Enron affiliate marketing companies are implicated in
this deal at all.

Can you confirm this is an "El Paso only" problem and not something Enron is
being drawn into?  I really appreciate your help here.

	From:  Drew Fossum                           09/05/2000 01:17 PM

To: Lorna Brennan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON,
Lorraine Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Christine
Stokes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, TK Lohman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michelle
Lokay/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Lindy Donoho/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lee
Huber/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Shelley
Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dari Dornan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Maria
Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jim Talcott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: So Cal Edison Claims Withholding of Pipeline Capacity

Please get copies to me asap of the Edison motion and the CPUC FERC
complaint.  Has someone, maybe someone at ENA, already looked at any
allegations about Enron or TW?  Please forward these to Kathy Ringblom also
and I'll have her itemize any allegations we might want to repond to.
Thanks  DF

ET & S Business Intelligence Department
From: Lorna Brennan on 09/05/2000 09:30 AM
To: Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON,
Lorraine Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Christine
Stokes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, TK Lohman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michelle
Lokay/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Lindy Donoho/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lee
Huber/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Shelley
Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dari Dornan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Maria
Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jim Talcott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew
Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: So Cal Edison Claims Withholding of Pipeline Capacity

Edison Charges Gas Market Manipulation

Southern California Edison filed a motion late last week with the California
Public Utility Commission seeking emergency relief from high spot gas prices
on which its power purchase rates are based. The company told the CPUC that
Southern California Border (Topock, AZ) prices in the last month have risen
by $2.50/MMBtu possibly because of market manipulation, in particular the
withholding off of the market of pipeline transportation capacity between the
supply basins and the California border.

"[T]here is substantial and compelling evidence that the basis differential
has been and continues to be grossly distorted by market power abuse,
collusion and affiliate self dealing of out-of-state gas suppliers and
merchants," Edison told the CPUC.

The company noted the CPUC already has filed a Section 5 complaint with FERC
regarding this issue and is seeking a recision of "certain allegedly
collusive contracts which it contends have permitted out-of-state natural gas
suppliers and their affiliates to drive up artificially California border gas
prices by wrongfully withholding capacity." It notes the complaint
"conservatively estimates that the anti-competitive manipulation of the basis
differential has already damaged California gas and electricity users by $100
million annually since the beginning of 1998."

Edison seeks an expedited order authorizing it to use the posted gas price of
$4.5133/MMBtu, which was applied to SCE's August 2000 avoided cost posting,
to calculate its payment obligations to qualified power producers for the
month of October and every month going forward. It estimated September
bidweek border prices would average $7/MMBtu. If such prices were used in
Edison's September avoided costs posting, its Transition Formula payments to
certain independent power producers will be $29 million more than the month
prior, the company told the CPUC. "No mechanism exists to recapture the
increase in such payments if it is later determined by this commission or in
another forum that the Topock border indices are unreliable at this time."

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--


Relieve some tension with this...

http://www.duthie.com/binladenliquors.htm

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp


NETWORK WORLD NEWSLETTER: JASON MESERVE
on SECURITY AND BUG PATCH ALERT
05/31/01 - Today's focus: Jennifer Lopez naked?

Dear Wincenty Kaminski,

In this issue:

* Patches and alerts for NetBSD, FreeBSD, Linux-Mandrake,
  Immunix, others
* Viruses, including a backdoor virus left by the sadmind/IIS
  worm
* A new version of SuSE Linux, plus other interesting reading

_______________________________________________________________
NEWS ALERTS NOW AVAILABLE FROM NETWORK WORLD!

You have very specific information needs about a technology or
technology vendor and you  subscribe to a newsletter or go on-
line to find out about the strategic developments in this
specific area. But how do you stay up with the late-breaking
news? Network World now offers six very focused News Alerts to
keep you abreast of the most significant developments of the
week on LANs, Storage, Network/Systems Management, The Edge,
Cisco and Microsoft. As an added service, if there's impactful,
late-breaking news about one of these specific technologies or
vendors, by subscribing to our News Alerts, we'll let you know
what it is within hours. Subscribe today at
http://nww1.com/go/ad082.html
_______________________________________________________________
Today's focus: Jennifer Lopez naked?

By Jason Meserve (write me at jmeserve@nww.com)

Oh boy, this one has the potential to be a big virus: A new
version of the LoveLetter virus is "in the wild" that comes
with an attachment claiming to be a naked picture of
movie/music star Jennifer Lopez. The recent Anna Kournikova
virus proved that sex sells, even if it is a virus.

The particulars on this one include a subject line of "Where
are you?", body text of "This is my pic in the beach!" and an
attachment called "JENNIFERLOPEZ_NAKED.JPG.vbs".  If you really
want to see Jennifer Lopez sans clothing, just watch the next
major awards show - she's bound to show up without clothes
eventually.

In other virus news, a hoax is going around that could convince
Windows 95 and 98 users to delete an innocuous file off their
systems. According to a story published by the IDG News
Service, "The warning tells users to delete the sulfnbk.exe
file, a utility used to restore long file names. The file isn't
usually infected, and running a virus check on it will prove
fruitless, which just adds to the hoax's credibility. The
message warns people that it's a virus undetectable by
antivirus software. Diligent users who search for the file and
find it may presume the warning was accurate and delete it."

For more on the hoax:
http://www.nwfusion.com/news/2001/0530virus.html

Today's bug patches and security alerts:

* NetBSD warns of denial of service vulnerability

NetBSD says it is possible to stop a NetBSD node from
communicating by bombarding it with fragmented IPv4 packets.
The NetBSD advisory says that for the attack to be effective,
the attacker needs to have good network connectivity to the
victim node (such as being logged onto the victim machine
itself or connected by a fat LAN). For more information:
ftp://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/security/advisories/NetBSD-SA2001-006.txt.as

c

* IP filter bypass possible

According to a NetBSD alert, "IP Filter (ipf) - the IP packet
filtering software in NetBSD - has a bug where the checks on a
fragmented packet are incomplete and it may be possible to
abuse this to bypass filter rules." For more information on
this:
ftp://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/security/advisories/NetBSD-SA2001-007.txt.as

c

* NetBSD patches sh3

According to NetBSD, "Missing validation of user-supplied
arguments to a system call can allow user applications on the
sh3 platform to execute code with supervisor privileges,
bypassing normal system protections. This problem is only
present on the sh3 platform, which includes the dreamcast,
evbsh3, hpcsh and mmeye ports." For more:
ftp://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/security/advisories/NetBSD-SA2001-008.txt.as

c

* FreeBSD warns of security holes in icecast

FreeBSD is urging users to upgrade to the latest version of
icecast, an application for serving up MP3 audio files.
Previous releases contained number format string
vulnerabilities that could allow a malicious user to run
arbitrary code on the affected system. Intel processor users
can download new icecast packages from:
ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-4-stable/audio/icecast

-1.3.10.tgz
ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-5-current/audio/icecas

t-1.3.10.tgz

* Samba fix available for FreeBSD

Samba, the service message block protocol used in Linux
operating systems, contains a temporary file race condition.
This flaw could be exploited to overwrite arbitrary files on
the affected system. Intel processor users can download new
Samba packages from:
ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-4-stable/net/samba-2.0

.9.tgz
ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-5-current/net/samba-2.

0.9.tgz
ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-4-stable/net/samba-dev

el-2.2.0.tgz
ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-5-current/net/samba-de

vel-2.2.0.tgz

* Linux-Mandrake, Immunix release gnupg patches

A patch is available to Linux-Mandrake and ImmunixOS users that
fixes a format string vulnerability in gnupg, an open source
version of PGP for Linux. The flaw could be exploited to invoke
shell commands with the privileges of the logged in user. For
more information and to download a patch, Linux-Mandrake users
can point to:
http://www.linux-mandrake.com/en/security/2001/MDKSA-2001-053.php3

Immunix users can get more information and links to patches at:
http://download.immunix.org/ImmunixOS/7.0/updates/IMNX-2001-70-023-01

General information can be found at:
http://www.gnupg.org/download.html

* SuSE, Immunix patch man packages

A couple of bugs in man (a tool for looking up online manual
pages on Linux and Unix systems) could allow a malicious user
to gain root access to the affected machine. More information
will be available shortly for SuSE users, including links to
patches, at:
http://www.suse.com/us/support/security/index.html

ImmunixOS users can get more information and patches from:
http://download.immunix.org/ImmunixOS/7.0/updates/IMNX-2001-70-021-01

* Immunix updates Kerberos package

According to an Immunix alert, there is "a possible buffer
overflow in the kerberos gssapi-aware ftpd in the krb5-
workstation package that is included in all versions of Immunix
OS." Immunix believes StackGuard will protect against this
flaw, but is urging users to upgrade anyway. For more
information and download links:
http://download.immunix.org/ImmunixOS/7.0/updates/IMNX-2001-70-022-01

Today's round up of virus alerts:

* Vigilante warns of improperly cleaned backdoor virus

Security software vendor Vigilante is warning that system
administrators may not be properly removing the sadmind/IIS
worm from their systems. The worm can be used as a backdoor for
hackers to enter an infected machine and deface Web pages as
well as cause other damage. It turns out that some people have
cleaned the initial virus, but did not remove the backdoor
program the virus drops, leaving the system vulnerable. For
more information on this:
http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-2001-11.html

* WM97/Marker-HL -- A Word macro virus that infects documents
and creates a non-viral file called "version.dat". (Sophos)

>From the interesting reading department:

* SuSE enhances multimedia, security of Linux OS

Linux vendor SuSE Linux Tuesday announced it would release an
upgrade to the SuSE Linux 7.1 operating system. SuSE Linux 7.2
will be available directly from the company and software
retailers starting June 15, the company said.
http://www.nwfusion.com/news/2001/0530suslin.html

* Microsoft says upgrade now or pay big later

IT executives could face millions of dollars in extra costs to
upgrade to the newest version of Microsoft Office, which ships
this week, if they don't buy upgrade packages before the
software giant's new license and maintenance program begins in
four months.
http://www.nwfusion.com/news/2001/0528office.html

* Free archives

All our newsletters are archived on Fusion, where you can
access them for free. Yes, free! So come on down:
http://www.nwfusion.com/newsletters/bug/index.html

_______________________________________________________________
To contact Jason Meserve:

Jason Meserve is the Multimedia Editor of Network World
Fusion and writes about streaming media, search engines and
IP Multicast. Jason can be reached at mailto:jmeserve@nww.com.
______________________________________________________________
FEATURED READER RESOURCE

User Excellence Award

If you've completed an interesting network project in the last
12 to 18 months, here's your chance to gain industry
recognition for it. Network World is currently accepting
nominations for its annual User Excellence Award. For more
information and an online nomination form, go to
http://www.nwfusion.com/nw/awards.html#excellence
Deadline for submission is June 11.
_______________________________________________________________
SUBSCRIPTION SERVICES

To subscribe or unsubscribe to any Network World e-mail
newsletters, go to:
http://www.nwwsubscribe.com/news/scripts/notprinteditnews.asp

To unsubscribe from promotional e-mail go to:
http://www.nwwsubscribe.com/ep

To change your e-mail address, go to:
http://www.nwwsubscribe.com/news/scripts/changeemail.asp

Subscription questions? Contact Customer Service by replying to
this message.

Have editorial comments? Write Jeff Caruso, Newsletter Editor,
at: mailto:jcaruso@nww.com

For advertising information, write Jamie Kalbach, Fusion Sales
Manager, at: mailto:jkalbach@nww.com

Copyright Network World, Inc., 2001

------------------------
This message was sent to:  vkamins@enron.com


The following rates would be required to meet the cash flow target discount at 7.5%  to cover the capital cost.

15 Yr      10,000 MMBtu/d    @    $.297
10 Yr      10,000 MMBtu/d    @    $.37
  5 Yr      10,000 MMBtu/d    @    $.62
  1 Yr      10,000 MMBtu/d    @  $2.71

The following rates would be required on the remaining capacity to achieve a 15% IRR for the project.

15 Yr    @  $.33  assumes no fuel tracker.
15 Yr    @  $.36  assumes a fuel tracker starting in year 6.

I will be on vacation tommorrow, but if you want some additional cases ran on Monday, please send me an email and I will start working on them first thing Monday morning.

Thanks,
James


BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTS

eSource
eSource, Enron's research group, has experienced an overwhelmingly positive response to the research training which it has hosted.  Participation and interest by Enron employees has exceeded expectations and many classes were quickly filled.  As a result, repeat classes have been offered and new sessions have been added to the program.  In addition to the Lexis-Nexis and Dow Jones classes, eSource has now begun hosting sessions on Piranha (financials and pricing information), Investext (analyst reports and market analysis), Global Access (financials and corporate activity), and Securities Data Corp. (M&A, debt).   eSource has also arranged long distance sessions using interactive web tools for Enron employees around the world.  Watch for e-mails announcing new training sessions, either in Houston or in a virtual desktop mode.

Since our launch in December, the eSearch website has received over 230,000 hits.  The site today offers Enron employees access to 34 electronic databases.  These databases offer the latest financial and business on-line research capabilities in a cost-effective manner.  In this era of information explosion, databases are constantly being reviewed to ensure that Enron's research needs are being met.  If you know of a professionally relevant database that might be added to eSearch, let us know.  Meanwhile, to further fulfill Enron's research needs, eSource is arranging for desktop access to good-old-fashioned libraries too.  Books from public and local university libraries can be located, borrowed and delivered to employees' desks.  This should be particularly helpful for those with more specialized or technical research needs.

We are also proud to report that at a recent local research conference, Enron's eSource was featured as an industry trailblazer for having invented itself into a combined virtual library and intranet-based research center capable of delivering a broad range of research products and services via the user's desktop.  Attendees from Reliant, Shell, Halliburton and ExxonMobil and others were duly impressed.

As for the future, watch for Version 2.0 of the eSearch website, http://esource.enron.com, scheduled to launch soon.  It will feature greater functionality and additional content.  Look for new features like "Industry Overviews" and links to information providers like Frost & Sullivan, Country Watch, and World Energy Markets.

IN THE NEWS

Chicago And Its Suburbs Pick Enron, ComEd For Power Deals
06/06/2001  Dow Jones Energy Service (Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)
CHICAGO -(Dow Jones)-The City of Chicago and 47 suburban communities have decided to divide new deals for 400 megawatts of power between Enron Corp. (ENE) and local utility Commonwealth Edison Co., Chicago officials said Wednesday.
In the largest power purchase agreement in Illinois since the state choose to deregulate the industry in 1997, the local government groups will get 60% of their power from Enron and 40% from Exelon Corp.'s (EXC) ComEd. The municipalities use the power for public buildings and public transportation.
Chicago announced Monday that the group has picked ComEd to meet the renewable target by providing 80 megawatts of power created with landfill gas, wind and other sources. ComEd will also provide the coalition with another 80 megawatts of power generated with fossil fuel and nuclear plants, and Enron will provide the other 240 megawatts. The new contracts are expected to go into effect this year.
"We used our purchasing power as local governments to get the best price we could and at the same time to promote competition in Illinois. Enron gave us the most competitive price,"  Chicago Mayor Richard M. Daley said at a press conference.

WELCOME
New Hires
EGM  - Jennifer Morris, Mike Reen, Daniel Fuller, Jason Paterniti
ENA  - Craig Hawkins, Carol Langston, Mark Morrow, Harlan Murphy, Bruce Petitt, Emily Schwarzbach, Alice Wright, Allyson Zykorie

Transfers (to or within)
ENA - Thomas Kalb, Debra Brannen, Juan Camarillo, Richard Orellana
EGM - Joana Bekerman, Eric Tipp, Kellie Metcalf, Ricardo Charvel, Jason Andrade
EIM - Jaime Araoz, Gabriel Chavez, Enrique Cadena, Rosalinda Castillo, Kimberly Chick, Ana Morena, William Brown, Grisela Escamilla, Paul Burkhart, Jodi Coulter, Douglas McDowell, Catherine Pernot

NUGGETS & NOTES

Enron is hosting the Chicago Energy Risk Management Seminar at The Drake Hotel in Chicago on June 14, 2001.  Topics include: Power Outlook, Natural Gas Outlook, Hedging Strategies, Weather Risk Management and Pulp and Paper Risk Management. The RSVP deadline is June 8th so please contact Laura Pena as soon as possible at x 3-5376.  This is a great event for "new" as well as established customers.  There will be a cocktail reception immediately after the presentations.  Enron will also be hosting seminars in Atlanta, Houston, Denver and San Francisco.  Dates to be announced soon.

Congratulations to Kathy and Craig Taylor, manager in East Origination. They are the proud parents of a baby girl, Katherine Montgomery, born on May 25.

Travel tip of the week:
When booking through TAP or ClickTrip, use preferred domestic airline carriers to recognize special Enron discounts.
	American		28%		American West		15%
	Continental		17%		Delta			10-28%
	Northwest		20%		TWA			19-25%
	United			20%		US Airways		30%

Please note: discounts are confidential and should not be disclosed to anyone other than Enron employees.

EnronOnline Statistics
Below are the latest figures for EnronOnline as of June 5, 2001.

*	Total Life to Date Transactions > 1,045,000
*	Life to Date Notional Value of Transactions > $630 billion

experience Enron
Announcing enhancements to experience Enron:
?	To begin your customer's Enron experience, we will send out customized invitations with a Guest Check-In Card that contains detailed instructions about check in.
?	experience ENRON has partnered with the Plaza Reception Desk Staff to create a less stressful check in process for your customers.  Once they present their card, the Plaza Reception Desk Staff will welcome them and present them with a prepared experience ENRON name badge.
?	experience ENRON has also created a new look for your meetings.  Our new table tents, welcome folders, name badges, agendas and presentation templates all have the same look to maintain a consistent feel throughout the visit.
?	All of this is to ensure that your guest has a unique and customized experience that will exceed their expectations and help you reach your business goals faster.
For more information on experience ENRON, visit our website at experience.Enron.com.

LEGAL STUFF
The information contained in this newsletter is confidential and proprietary to Enron Corp. and its subsidiaries.  It is intended for internal use only and should not be disclosed.


Simon:

Sorry about the delay.

I know we subscribe to various information services from Bloomberg and
Reuters, but I am not aware of any relationship we have with Thomson
Financial - then again that's not too surprising.  I suggest you talk to the
people in investor relations and maybe the Info Central people who may have
subscribed to such services.  The only way I would have heard about them
would be if they were to be used for EnronOnline or in the highly unlikely
event that they had consulted me on the subscription contracts.  Please feel
free to call if I can be of any other help.

Mark (x37459)

	Simon Duff
	07/12/2000 07:39 AM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Tomas Valnek/LON/ECT@ECT, Maria Raftery/LON/ECT@ECT, Richard J
Black/LON/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: FirstCall Information Service

Mark

I understand that you oversee the legal issues/contracts relating to our
financial trading activities and consequently was hoping you might be able to
assist us in regard to the following query that relates to sourcing data from
external financial information providers.

I work in EnronCredit.com as a Telecommunication analyst and am interested in
accessing the above information source which is provided by Thomson
Financial.  FYI, "FirstCall" allows online realtime access to a wide variety
of debt and equity focused investment house/broker reports.

We originally had access via a trial that was apparently initiated by a "C.
Weber" who was based out of Houston but who has subsequently left the company.

Unfortunately, access to this service has been withdrawn by Thomson Financial
here in London on the basis that we are a "corporate" and not a "financial"
or "fund manager".  Thomson Financial are now offering us a reduced
time-delayed service ("Investex") which is not sufficient for our needs and
consequently we would like to reestablish the FirstCall service or a service
providing similar or superior functionality.

Prior to meeting with Thomson, I would very grateful if you could enlighten
us on any of the following:

- Whether Enron has any relationship and/or agreements in place with Thomson
Financial in the US;
- If the latter is the case, which services we receive from this data
supplier;
- If this is not the case, which alternative but similar data services we do
receive.

I believe that if we can establish that we already receive the FirstCall
service in the US it would greatly strengthen our case for receiving it here
in the UK.  Alternatively, if we do not receive this service in the US it
would be extremely valuable for us to know what alternative, but similar,
sources of information are available, in order that we might have another
option should Thomson Financial prove to be inflexible on the issue of
supplying FristCall.

Should you have any queries in relation to any of the above, please do not
hesitate to contact me either by return or on the direct number below.

Thanks for your help with this.

Regards

Simon Duff (## 44 20 7783 4585)


lets go buy another but I get to pick

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Huble, Amanda
Sent:	Thursday, May 24, 2001 7:49 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

Thank you!  I'm glad you're pleased!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, May 24, 2001 7:49 AM
To:	Huble, Amanda
Subject:

very nice


-----Original Message-----
From: 	owner-newsreleases@energy.ca.gov@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-owner-newsreleases+40energy+2Eca+2Egov+40ENRON@ENRON.com]  On Behalf Of "Farideh Namjou" <fnamjou@energy.state.ca.us>
Sent:	Monday, September 24, 2001 6:10 PM
To:	newsreleases@energy.ca.gov
Subject:	[NEWSRELEASES-LIST] Energy Commission Approves Metcalf Power Plant in San Jose

               * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
to unsubscribe from this list....see info at the end....

               * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

For immediate release: September 24, 2001
Contact: Claudia Chandler: (916) 654-4989

Energy Commission Approves
Metcalf Power Plant in San Jose

Sacramento - By a 5 to 0 vote, the California Energy Commission today gave the Metcalf Energy Center final approval for construction and operation. The natural gas-fired, combined-cycle power plant project, proposed by Calpine Corporation and Bechtel Enterprises, Inc., is expected to cost approximately $400 million and create 25 permanent jobs.
The 600-megawatt power plant is approved for a 20-acre site located in San Jose at the southern base of Tulare Hill in northern Coyote Valley. The plant's electrical output will supply the needs of 600,000 homes.
Calpine and Bechtel Enterprises are scheduled to begin construction on the project this October with commercial operation expected to serve the summer load of 2003. This merchant plant will sell power in California's electricity market.
On June 18, 2001, the Energy Commission's Metcalf Energy Center Committee, comprised of Energy Commissioner Robert Laurie, Presiding Member, and Commission Chairman William J. Keese, Second Member, recommended the power plant for full-Commission approval. The Presiding Member's Proposed Decision and its August 24, 2001, Revised Presiding Member's Proposed Decision on the Metcalf Power Plant may be accessed on the Commission's web site at:

www.energy.ca.gov/sitingcases/metcalf

The Committee's approval of the Metcalf Energy Center license came after a rigorous, two and a half year-long review process in which the Commission actively sought public input on the proposal. More than 50 public workshops, hearings and conferences were held on the project in which members of the public, 18 formal "intervenors," other governmental agencies, and community groups participated in the Energy Commission's review process.
In its 480-page Revised Presiding Member's Proposed Decision, the Committee reviewed all aspects of the proposal, including environmental impacts, public health and safety, air quality, hazardous materials, and engineering alternatives. Based on evidence presented at formal hearing, the Committee recommended the project for certification under the Warren-Alquist Act and the California Environmental Quality Act.
In its vote to license the Metcalf project, the Energy Commission exercised its override authority, an important part of the State's statutory scheme for ensuring against power shortages in locations where power is needed for reliability. The Commissioners agreed with the staff that the need for the project and benefits it will bring to the San Jose area outweigh its lack of compliance with local ordinances.
The Energy Commission exercises its override authority cautiously, preferring in most cases to work with local agencies to achieve consensus with local jurisdictions; 1981 was the only other time the Commission exercised its override authority. In that case, the issue was a transmission line from the Geysers 16 project that the County of Sonoma contended violated its general plan. The Energy Commission's override was upheld in subsequent court action.
The power plants permitted by the Energy Commission since 1999 will boost California's power supply by 10,982 megawatts by summer 2003. Nine simple-cycle power plants licensed this year will add 683 megawatts to the grid by year's end.
The Commission's web site provides complete information about the review of California power plant proposals at:
www.energy.ca.gov/sitingcases/

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

To unsubscribe from this list, please go to:

http://www.energy.ca.gov/listservers/

Or simply send an e-mail to majordomo@energy.ca.gov
and in the body of the e-mail, type in

unsubscribe (name of this list)

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Farideh Namjou
Web Development Team
California Energy Commission
916-654-4989

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *


Mark,

Attached are lists of the reference credits who have been approved by the
Credit group for Credit Trading. This list was based on the agreement between
Bill and Bryan that all reference credits posess an investment grade rating.
Call if you have questions.


It now appears the Methanol Plant will be up making product about July 28.


President Bush's statement on 201.

	Larry Decker
	06/05/2001 04:37 PM

		 To: Lisa Yoho/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Chris
Long/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: POTUS Statement re: 201

President's Statement Regarding a Multilateral Initiative On Steel

WASHINGTON, June 5 /U.S. Newswire/ -- The following was released today by the
White House:

STATEMENT BY THE PRESIDENT

This Administration is committed to free trade as an engine of growth. As
part of our free trade agenda, we are committed to ensuring that American
industry and American workers can compete on a level playing field. That is
why, today, I am announcing my intent to launch an initiative to respond to
the challenges facing the U.S. steel industry. This initiative will be
designed to restore market forces to world steel markets and eliminate the
practices that harm our steel industry and its workers.

The U.S. steel industry has been affected by a 50-year legacy of foreign
government intervention in the market and direct financial support of their
steel industries. The result has been significant excess capacity,
inefficient production, and a glut of steel on world markets.

My decision to pursue this initiative comes after extensive consultations by
Members of the Cabinet with our industry, our steelworkers, and interested
Members of Congress. We have discussed the challenges facing U.S. steel
manufacturers, and we understand that we have a critical stake in a healthy
U.S. steel industry.

Thus, I intend to take the following steps. First, I am directing the United
States Trade Representative, in cooperation with the Secretary of Commerce
and Secretary of the Treasury, to initiate negotiations with our trading
partners seeking the near-term elimination of inefficient excess capacity in
the steel industry worldwide, in a manner consistent with applicable U.S.
laws.

Second, I am directing the U.S. Trade Representative, together with the
Secretaries of Commerce and the Treasury, to initiate negotiations on the
rules that will govern steel trade in the future and eliminate the underlying
market-distorting subsidies that led to the current conditions in the first
place. Absent strict disciplines barring government support, direct or
indirect, for inefficient steel-making capacity, the problems confronting the
U.S. steel industry and the steel industry worldwide will only recur.

We see these negotiations and the goal of restoring market forces as being in
our interest and in the interest of our trading partners and their steel
industries. That is why we would like to work cooperatively with our trading
partners in pursuing this initiative.

Third, I am directing the U.S. Trade Representative to request the initiation
of an investigation of injury to the United States industry by the
International Trade Commission under section 201 of the Trade Act of 1974.
This action is consistent with our WTO obligations.

This three-part strategy, coupled with further restructuring of the U.S.
industry, should help the industry meet the challenges it faces. I look
forward to working together with the industry, the steelworkers, Congress,
and our international trading partners in support of this important
initiative.

Contact: White House Press Office, 202-456-2580


Hey Rob,

I put some Katy basis products out there for approval.  Could you see to
those?

Thanks,

Eric


The Reliability Rules Subcommittee of the New York State Reliability Council ("NYSRC") is posting this message to inform all interested parties of the ability to participate, on a "listen-only" basis, in the NYSRC Reliability Rules Subcommittee's Open Meeting No. 33 scheduled for Thursday, January 31, 2002, starting at 10:00 A.M.The agenda which includes the meeting location and dial-in number for this open meeting is attached.  The meeting will be conducted per the guidelines of NYSRC Openness Policy No. 2-3 "http://www.nysrc.org/tcweb/pdf/Policy%202-3%20Final.pdf". It is requested that those who plan on attending or listening shall send an email to "larry.hochberg@nypa.gov" with the names of the individuals & organizations participating.  Please visit "http:\\www.nysrc.org" for more NYSRC information.

LawrenceT. Hochberg
Secretary, NYSRC Reliability Rules Subcommittee

 - rrs_agenda33.doc
---
You are currently subscribed to nyiso_tie as: benjamin.rogers@enron.com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-nyiso_tie-628650Q@lyris.nyiso.com


The meeting with IHS representatives will take place at 11:30 in the same conference room, EB3321.
Thanks,

Catalina Cardenas
Analyst
Enron North America
(713)345-3650


Gina,

I shall be glad to speak with you. Shirley Crenshaw will call you to set up a
meeting.

Vince

From: Gina Corteselli/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/16/2001 01:12 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: PRC Feedback forms

Mr. Kaminski:

I would like to try to get on your schedule for a few moments this week to
discuss the draft  PRC 360 evaluation forms (provided below for your info) to
ensure that the criteria and skills and behaviors we have used are adequate
for your employee population.  The generic forms that were presented at the
PRC Committee meeting a week ago may best reflect commercial employees, and
to some extent commercial support employees, and may not be entirely
appropriate for employees in some of the specialized technical and technical
areas.  I would appreciate your input on this so that, if possible and time
permitting, we can try to tailor the form to suit needs across the
organization.

One simple solution may be to add a skills/behaviors block requesting
evaluation and feedback on the employees specific job and performance,
another solution would be to add job specific behaviors and descriptors to
the list of those already developed (second attachment below).  I would
welcome your thoughts and a few moments of your time to chat with you about
this.

Many Thanks,
Gina Corteselli
 Global Performance Management
713 853-3377
713 569-5589 (mobile)


Market Participants:

> PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) is planning to commence the 2000 Operational
> Study in July 2000.  As in past years, PwC is seeking input from market
> participants prior to recommending the specific procedures to be covered
> in this Operational Study.  The Audit Committee will make the final
> decision on the scope of the Study based on recommendations from PwC,
> which will reflect input from this stakeholder feedback process.
>
> Please call or e-mail Charlotte Martin at (916) 351-2118 /
> cmartin@caiso.com to request a meeting (in person or via conference call)
> with PwC to discuss the scope of this study.
>
> As described at the May Audit Committee meeting, market participants will
> be given the opportunity to have a member of Operations management, Trent
> Carlson, present during all or a portion of the meetings.  At its recent
> meeting, the Audit Committee reaffirmed its position that information
> conveyed during these meetings is to be treated in the strictest
> confidence when the market participants so desire.
>
> When making arrangements for the meeting please advise Charlotte which of
> the three choices you desire:
>  1)  Meet with PwC only
>  2)  Meet with PwC and Trent Carlson
>  3)  Meet first with PwC only; followed by a session including Trent
> Carlson to cover certain matters addressed in the first meeting that the
> market participant wish to communicate directly to CAISO management.
>
Don Fuller
Director, Client Relations

Sent on behalf of Don Fuller by Alice Leonard

Alice Leonard
Client Relations
(916) 351-4467
aleonard@caiso.com


Cheryl just received word that a close friend of hers has died of a heart attack, and she is leaving immediately.  If you have any questions, contact me at 5-3317.

Regards,
Keegan


You guys probably don't remember this (I didn't until I checked the file) but
there were a couple of exhibits to the Transwestern Gallup contracts that we
left to be attached to the final contracts after execution.  My recollection
is that we were in such a hurry to get the Compression Service Agreement
signed and sent to FERC that we left a couple of these things to do later.
Now that we have the FERC order, I want to get these contracts off my desk
and off to Corporate Records or whereever original contracts go to die.   On
my originals, I'm missing Exhibit B to the CSA (which is the CDEC Rate
Schedule No. 21),  and Exhibits A and C to the O&M Agreement.

Susan, please coordinate with Gerald to get these exhibits in our respective
files and we can send these contracts off to the central rathole and be done
with it.  Thanks to you all.  DF


The Senate voted on the Interior Appropriations Bill late yesterday.  Our
amendment passed, which prevents either BLM or the Forest Service from
enacting new fiber optic federal lands rights-of-way policies.  The BLM made
a last ditch effort to defeat this in the Senate, but we had reached key
Senators and staff and they got nowhere.

Action now moves to Conference, which for us means a focus on the House
Conference members.  Scott and I will spend the next 2 days meeting with the
key Republicans in the House.  We've already recruited the important
Democrats.  Interior Approps Subcommittee Chairman Regula remains opposed, at
least publicly, but we think we can get other Members to swing him.  We trust
he'll come up with a sensible, face saving compromise on his own, eg,
formally beginning a review process with his Subcommittee having oversight --
at this point, our language literally forbids BLM or Forest Service from even
meeting to discuss the issue.

We continue, though, on several other fronts:

1. We have the New Dems writing OMB on the issue and several Senators and
Congressmen writing BLM and USFS
2. We've increased the pressure on the White House, and are letting them know
through very senior back door channels that in our opinion, BLM/Forest
Service have not gotten the message.  Our position is that we'll be satisfied
that they've changed their evil ways when the new assessment on the Mt. Hood
EBS build is retracted.
3. We're preparing both Senate and House authorizing Committees for the
longer-term issue next session.  We have no trouble finding champtions eager
to own the issue
4. We're engaging the Western Caucus for same
5. Our adhoc coalition continues to grow in numbers and clout with over 20
companies and associations now actively engaged.  Enron chairs this
initiative, with a tangible side benefit being much increased visibility and
stature as a serious communications player.
6. Scott is successfully engaging state and local officials to weigh in from
the end-user perspective

BLM is on the retreat and has asked for a meeting, which we've refused.   We
don't think they've given up though, and it's likely an issue of pride at
this point.  So until the Approps process concludes we're continuing with the
full court press.

Steve


Guys, we are set up for a meeting with the ENA Office of the Chairman to
discuss ENA's generation strategy and iniatives for Thursday, July 6 th from
7:30AM to 11:00 AM.  The purpose of the meeting is to get buy -off on the
strategy and start the approval process (DASH and Board/Skilling)
specifically for Moore, LV Cogen and Pastoria.

Proposed Agenda:

 a) Overview
  - overall map
  - current turbine book

 b) West:   Calger/Parquet
  -  Pastoria - DASH and approvals;
  - LV Cogen - DASH and approvals;
  - Coyote Springs - one page update - fyi;
  - PSCo - one page update - fyi;
  - other - few pages on future development strategy in west - fyi and
approvals;

 c) Canada:  Milnthorp/LeDain
  - Project Moore - DASH and approvals;
  - other - few pages on future development strategy in Canada - fyi and
approvals;

 d) East:   Dietrich/Jacoby
  - Austin Energy - one page update - fyi;
  - Florida project - overall proposal - many pages necessary to get approval
- fyi and approvals;
  - LIPA - one page update - fyi;
  - Linden 6 - one page update - fyi;
  - other - few pages on future development strategy in east - fyi and
approvals;

 e) Mexico   Yzaguirre
  - Monterrey project - couple page update - fyi;

 f) Genco   Miller
  - overview on "Genco" strategy - fyi.

Regards
Delainey


The following message has been sent to all ENA administrative assistants.  If
you have any questions please let me know.

    The SAP Implementation

How does it Impact You!

NEW SAP Account Coding The SAP account coding structure will be different.
This includes the General Ledger Chart of Accounts, Project workorders, and
invoice coding. More coding will be required to provide better information
for analysis and reporting.

All Department/RC numbers will change! All departments have been assigned a
new SAP Cost Center number. This is effective for companies implementing SAP
on 7/1/2000 (The conversion list will be available by the end of May 2000).

Internal Services Effective 6/15/00 the new SAP Company/Cost Center must be
used to request Houston Office internal services, such as:

Forms & Stationary
TAP ) Travel Agency in the PARK
Overnight Deliveries )(e.g. Fed Ex, UPS, etc.)	Audio/Visual Services
	A/C & Lighting after hours
	Catering

Accounts Payable Checks will NOT be issued from June 16th to July 5th due to
the Accounts Payable transition to the SAP system (applies to Corporate
Accounts Payable in Houston). Plan ahead to submit your invoices and expense
reports with the current coding before June 15th!

For July invoice and expense report processing, YOU will be required to
provide the appropriate SAP account coding.
? Invoice Coding Workshops will be held to introduce the new coding structure
and additional fields required
? New forms have been developed to accommodate the new SAP coding.
? Certain Coding conversions such as RC,s and Project coding will be
available on the intranet

What,s Next?
? Invoice Coding Workshop Schedules will be announced
? Documentation and forms are available on the intranet
http://sap.enron.com/quickref/default.html

For any immediate concerns contact ENA Site Manager Cynthia Morrow at
713-853-5128.


Brad Nebergall advises he has not sought formal approval of the Catalytica
transaction because it is too early to know for sure that we have a deal (
ie, we still do not have GE's reaction to the latest draft Xonon
Implementation Agreement and, as we discussed, we will still need to get the
Option Repurchase Agreement blessed by Catalytica's auditors). Brad said,
however, that he has met twice with underwriting on the transaction, and that
Dave Delaney is in "general agreement" with the deal "in concept". I hope
that addresses your inquiry, and I'll update you when (and if) we move to the
next stage.


Dear Investor:

Curious if you are among the best of the traders?
Well now you can find out.  On November 5th, at the
open of the market, some of the top traders nationwide
will come together to compete for cash and glory in
TheStreet.com's Trading Game.  The cost of admission
is $250.

Click here to enter anytime before November 5th, and the
first 20 players to signup get a FREE month of Action
Alerts PLUS:

http://www.marketplayer.com/tsc/index.html?sponsor_tag=tsc01

With $14,700 in weekly cash prizes you won't want to
miss out on this opportunity.  The game will run for
one week and the trades will be executed and posted
in real-time.  The top 20 players will win cash prizes
and if you are ranked first among the best of the best,
you'll be granted the GRAND prize of $5,000!

Click here to trade for $5,000:

http://www.marketplayer.com/tsc/index.html?sponsor_tag=tsc01

As a member of TheStreet.com, we would like to invite
you to test your trading strategies and learn from other
elite traders -- all player portfolios are transparent.
We will be covering the action during the trading week
through daily analysis and commentary of top performers.
Now is the time to do it.  So good luck and
may the best trader win!

Click here to learn more:

http://www.marketplayer.com/tsc/index.html?sponsor_tag=tsc01

-----------------------------------------------------------
This email has been sent to you by TheStreet.com because
you are a current or former subscriber (either free-trial
or paid) to one of our web sites, http://www.thestreet.com/or
http://www.realmoney.com/. If you would prefer not to receive
these types of emails from us in the future, please click here:
http://www.thestreet.com/z/unsubscribe.jhtml?Type=M  If you are
not a current or former subscriber, and you believe you received
this message in error, please forward this message to
members@realmoney.com, or call our customer service department
at 1-800-562-9571.

Please be assured that we respect the privacy of our
subscribers. To view our privacy policy, please
click here: http://www.thestreet.com/tsc/about/privacy.html


can you send down your rockies forecast again?  i need to look at your
numbers for the winter again.

thanks

matt


for deal 694859 -- it should be 4.48

  for deal 697646 -- for the 30-31 it should be 4.50


I have thrown together the following list of issues that people have raised
so far:

Opportunity Costs under the soft cap
$150 too low
Benchmarks for Forward contracts
Regulation of long term sales
Preemption of PUC "buy" requirement
Commission's findings concerning exercise of market power
PUC's request for protective order


Start Date: 1/6/02; HourAhead hour: 19;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002010619.txt


John,

For your information.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 07/28/2000
12:34 PM ---------------------------

Tom Halliburton@ENRON
07/28/2000 12:23 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: SDDP

Vince,
I'll send him one of the manuals, and perhaps a paper on SDDP.

Tom

Vince J Kaminski@ECT
07/28/2000 10:53 AM
To: Tom Halliburton/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: SDDP

Tom,

Can you send the info regarding SDDP to John?

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 07/28/2000
10:52 AM ---------------------------

Vince J Kaminski
07/19/2000 06:41 PM
To: "O'Brien John" <jobrien@snowyhydro.com.au> @ ENRON
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: SDDP

John,

I shall E-mail the information about SDDP  from Houston.

Vince

"O'Brien John" <jobrien@snowyhydro.com.au> on 07/18/2000 01:47:41 AM
To: vkamins@enron.com
cc:
Subject: SDDP

Vincent,

You kindly suggested that I email you with regard to some information you
have on the SDDP system (I'm not sure if I've got the abbreviation correct,
but it's something that is currently used in South America).

Your presentation was very interesting and informative.

Kind regards,

John O'Brien
Manager, Treasury & Risk Management
Snowy Hydro Trading Pty Ltd
Level 17, Bligh House
4 Bligh Street
Sydney NSW 2000


A psych student could write a dissertation about that statement.

From: Roseann Engeldorf on 11/30/2000 09:51 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: LM 6000/Coral transaction

i am a woman with no future - i exist in the eternal blackness of the here
and now


Greetings and Happy Holidays to all of my Big Braves and Little Guides and
Princesses,

This is just a reminder on the Children's Museum activity planned for
Saturday, 12/2/00.  This activity will be from Noon until 5:00pm.   The
admission is $10.00 for the Parent and the Child.  Please keep in mind that
the trip does not necessarily have to begin at Noon.  This is an activity
where you can set an arrival time that is convenient for yourself or your
tribe.   Just remember that the Museum closes at 5:00pm.  Unfortunately, I
have an emergency that can not be avoided so I will be arriving probably
later in the day if at all.  Please contact anyone who you feel may benefit
from this outing whether it be tribal members or family and friends.   I
will be in touch again soon to give details on the Holiday Skating Party at
the Sharpstown skating center.  I hear that Santa is going to be there so
I'm sure that it's going to be a blast.

Howling Wolf


Let me know by today, please.
---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 09/05/2000 08:15 AM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Eric Bass                           09/05/2000 08:15 AM

To: Timothy Blanchard/HOU/EES@EES, Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryan
Hull/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: The Mighty Horns

Texas' first football game is this weekend and I have tickets for each of
you.  I would like to leave around 3:00 on Friday to go to Austin. We will
come back on Saturday after the game.

Let me know today if you still want to go.

-Eric


Thanks

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, May 31, 2001 11:45 AM
To:	Huble, Amanda
Subject:

nice balloon


Donnie Vinson
Enron NetWorks
5-8177
donald.wayne.vinson@enron.com


-----Original Message-----
From: 	"Sean Mayers" <smmayers@home.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 7:52 PM
To:	Smetana, Scott; Singla, Vip; Richter, Mike; Richter, Christine; Richey, Patrick; Reishus, Matt; Polian, Kevin; O'Connor, Kelly; Moon, Chad; Mom; Mayers, Kim; Highberger, Dale; Hiatt, Drew; Hackel, Jody; Giron, Darron; Giron, Carlos; Daughtery, Brian; Brion, Jeremy; Boehm, Greg; Aunt Darnell
Cc:	cvandeven1@aol.com; joa@gateway.net
Subject:	Fw: Don't Know if Accurate - Probably Is

----- Original Message -----
From: "Joseph Mayers" <jmayers@kc.rr.com>
To: "Sean M." <smmayers@home.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 1:33 PM
Subject: Don't Know if Accurate - Probably Is

>
>
> > >
> > > Can you imagine working for a company that has a
> > > little more than 500 employees and has the following statistics:
> > >
> > > *29 have been accused of spousal abuse
> > > *7 have been arrested for fraud
> > > *19 have been accused of writing bad checks
> > > *117 have directly or indirectly bankrupted at least 2 businesses
> > > *3 have done time for assault
> > > *71 cannot get a credit card due to bad credit
> > > *14 have been arrested on drug-related charges
> > > *8 have been arrested for shoplifting
> > > *21 are currently defendants in lawsuits
> > > *84 have been arrested for drunk driving in the last year
> > >
> > > TOTAL: 373
> > >
> > > Can you guess which organization this is?
> > >
> > > ...............
> > >
> > > Give up yet?
> > >
> > > .................
> > >
> > > It's the 535 members of the United States Congress,
> > > the same group of Idiots that crank out hundreds of new laws each
> >
>


This is a copy of the presentation that Bob Superty made to the Peoples
Energy Board this week.  Lousie Kitchen told me that he was very impressive
in the presentation (not a surprise to me, but it is nice when others
recognize the talent that is in the operations organization).  We may be able
to incorporate some of this into our presentation to originators for internal
purposes, and there may be parts of this that could be used in external
marketing tools. --Sally
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 04/05/2001 05:48 PM
---------------------------

Robert Superty
04/05/2001 04:53 PM
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob M Hall/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Peoples presentation

Sally, Bob  FYI (or your files) - here is the presentation I gave to the
Peoples Energy Board of Directors.

Let me know if you have any questions - Bob


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 01/17/2001
12:05 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Mike A Roberts                           01/17/2001 11:17 AM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer Fraser/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: FYI - kudos to Steve Bennett

Vince,

Just to keep you infromed on the nice piece done by Steve Bennett (attachment
below)

- - - Mike---

------------------- Forwarded by Mike A Roberts/HOU/ECT on 01/17/2001 11:11
AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Stephen Bennett @ ENRON                           01/17/2001 10:17 AM

To: Mike A Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Additional Support? Re: Europe Winter Weather

---------------------- Forwarded by Stephen Bennett/NA/Enron on 01/17/2001
10:19 AM ---------------------------

Frank Lien@ECT
01/17/2001 10:13 AM
To: Stephen Bennett/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Bjarne Schieldrop/OSL/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Europe Winter Weather

Good Morning,
Thank you very much for your reply on my questions regarding the rest of the
winter season in Europe,
it is very useful information for us to get a commentary from professionals.

It would be good to get such an extensive report from time to time, or
whenever a major change in the weather pattern take place.
On a day to day basis, is it possible to get a short comment on your opinions
on the weather situation in Europe.

Thank you in advance.

Best regards,
Frank Lien
Enron Europe Weather Desk
Phone +47 23 10 25 62

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Stephen Bennett @ ENRON                           17/01/2001 13:37

To: frank.line@enron.com
cc: Jose Marquez/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mike A Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Europe Winter Weather

Frank,

Here is an outline of what Mike, Jose and I put together today concerning the
remainder of the winter across Europe:

The Bottom Line:

Much of the continent should feature temperatures, on average, cooler than
the past few months.  Overall temperatures should be normal to below normal
in the February and March timeframe.  An active sub-tropical jetstream will
continue to provide a wet pattern near the Mediterranean keeping temperatures
on the below side of normal.  Western Europe will also see the best chances
for colder weather intrusions as the NAO trends positive.  Even with this
cooler trend across Europe, there are no signs that the Arctic Pool of air in
Siberia will move westward toward eastern Europe.  Overall no extreme
deviations from normal are expected, only a slight trend toward cooler than
normal.

Let me Know if there is more we can do:
Steve

Stephen Bennett
Meteorologist - Research
Enron Americas
(713) 345-3661
stephen.bennett@enron.com


UBS Warburg holds 7.7 million shares of Enron stock (Laura x36785)(if you are unavailable, I put it on Frevert's calendar also)


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 12/22/2000
07:54 AM ---------------------------

	Clayton Vernon @ ENRON
	12/21/2000 03:51 PM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: f/up

Vince-

I got your message (I was up on the roof of the building helping to fix the
weather satellite dish- what a gorgeous view of Houston!).

I appreciate your words. Everything remains fine, Vince. You are my "father"
here at Enron, and I admire and respect you greatly. I think I know the kind
of person you are, in terms of your integrity, and I admire the high
standards you set for all of us in your extended "Group."

I want to let you know I am not the only one in the group who doesn't
appreciate the way Maureen disrespects you. You remain the key external
factor in their success- it is not simply their own abilities that matter to
their futures but your own- Vince's- success with upper management that
matters.

We respect you, and we don't like it when you are disrespected. Maureen
didn't disrespect me today, Vince, she disrespected you.

It's time I told you something. Last April, Maureen, highly intoxicated
following a work-related function at Ninfa's, made an unsolicited predatory
sexual advance on me at my desk on the 19th floor. I was shocked and
disgusted, but I didn't say one word about this, Vince, because I played it
out and didn't want to put you into the position of having a raving Maureen
in your midst as you perhaps had to fire her and then endure a litany of
gender-bias crap lawsuits.

I "took one for the team," Vince. I can'rt say I would do it again- Maureen
is brazen to berate me after what she did, in public no less.

I appreciate your bringing me into Enron. I've found a respectful and,
indeed, a loving work environment. I remain willing to do whatever I can to
help the Group.

Clayton


Could you please send the documents to our office in Calgary.

Chris Dorland
Enron Canada Corp.
3500 Canterra Tower
400 - 3rd Ave. SW
Calgary, AB   Canada
T2P 4H2

Thanx,

Chris


Hello Everyone,

I'm forwarding a state licensing matrix that I put together for some of the
commercial people.  It describes where we currently have licenses and where
we'll be submitting applications for IXC licenses through the end of June.
Please let me know as you have additional information on any of these states
so that I can continue to update the matrix.  Thanks very much,

Sue

---------------------- Forwarded by Sue Nord/HOU/EES on 06/19/2000 10:24 AM
---------------------------

Sue Nord
06/14/2000 12:41 PM
To: Jim Fallon/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Paul Racicot/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications
cc: Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Bolton/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Donald Lassere/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: State Licensing Update

Jim and Paul,

The attached matrix shows the current status of state licensing for EBS.  I
will continue to update this matrix as we gather additional information.  The
states that are listed on this matrix have been identified based on our
understanding of commercial priorities, including fiber-build states.  Please
let us know if we missed any states that need to be filed as part of this
"first wave."   Filings will be made for remaining states shortly after these
applications are completed.

Please call if you have any questions,

Sue
(603) 224-5942


Mark and Leslie:
Claudio wants to talk to someone about this weather/power online product that
he is working on.    Enclosed is info on it.  Who should he be talking to
about this?  He is anxious to meet and I told him that as soon as we figured
out who his legal contact would be we would meet with him.  Please let me
know your thoughts.
Carol
----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 06/29/2000 02:51 PM -----

	Claudio Ribeiro@ENRON
	06/29/2000 02:16 PM

		 To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: PJM Power Demand

Carol,

I am helping the Weather Desk to develop a new product (PJM Power Demand). It
will initially be traded only internally.

I send you a presentation of the product and its description for EOL.

I think that we should schedule a time, so that we can discuss the product.

Thanks,

Claudio


I think Ashley sent Fab some info on the fest.  We have had to lock into the
rooms last week, so I do not know if we will be able to help her get a room
unless they still have some available when she makes a decision.

Sorry to hear about your work life stinking.  I definitely know the feeling.
The way I rationalize it is that I will take a job that has better hours
before Jackson gets into school.

On a happier note, we are going to dinner with your parents this weekend.
Should be fun.  Talk to you soon - don't work too hard.
PL

rachel.bonilla-kragel@accenture.com on 02/18/2001 09:02:30 PM
To: Phillip.M.Love@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Jazz Fest

Hey Phillip.....I am on a plane back to St. Paul (Sunday night).  My life
completely (other than Jason and Drew) sucks right now.  I can not wait
until this project is done and over with.  I have reached the point of
thinking about quitting.  Funny how only 5 weeks ago my career counselor
asked me regarding that same question...and I had zero intention.

Anyhow, I spoke with Fabiola..and she is still interested in coming out to
Jazz Fest....and was curious in speaking with you and/or Ashley about
rooms.  She is not 100%...but is curious in talking with you re:
possibilities.  Her email is fabiola_rock@hotmail.com...and her cell number
is 617-515-6760.

Give the little one love for me...
rbk

Rachel Bonilla-Kragel
Accenture
North American C&HT
Denver - Octel 359/6017 - Direct Dial (720) 359-6017
rachel.bonilla-kragel@accenture.com

This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
privileged or confidential information.  If you have received it in error,
please notify the sender immediately and delete the original.  Any other
use of the email by you is prohibited.


Following please find the Daily EnronOnline Executive Summary.

EnronOnline Executive Summary for 11/27/00
Transaction Summary
External Transactions Today	4,425
Average Daily External Transactions (30 day Trailing Avg)	3,767
Total Life to Date Transactions	468,825

EnronOnline Daily % of Entity's Total Transactions for 11/27/00	Trans	Percent
Enron North America	3,780	74%
Enron Europe Limited	164	35%
Global Products	178	41%
Enron Metals	303	15%

EnronOnline Percentage of Total Corporate Transactions
(30 day Trailing Avg)	52%

Gross Notional Value of EnronOnline Transactions	Total
Today	3,265,011,002
MTD	53,042,491,259
LTD	266,471,195,675
Average Daily Notional Value (30 Day Trailing Avg)	2,645,326,254

Notional Revenue from Physical Flows to Date	18,254,266,074

Counterparties, Users, and Products Offered
Counterparties having transacted to date	579
New Counterparties transacting for the first time today	1
Number of Products Offered Today	1,120
Total Number of External Users Logged on Today	3,135
Average # of External Users logged on (30 day Trailing Avg)	2,812


Thanks so much - your the best!


Start Date: 10/19/01; HourAhead hour: 17;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  Variances detected.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001101917.txt

Error retrieving HourAhead price data - process continuing...
---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 17 / Preferred:   0.00 / Final:   0.00)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 10/19/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: CISO_EPMI_LADWP
  ENGY_TYPE: NFRM


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 10/02/2000
05:01 PM ---------------------------

"Darron Giron" <dgiron1@pdq.net> on 10/01/2000 10:21:33 PM
Please respond to "Darron Giron" <dgiron1@pdq.net>
To: <dgiron@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Fw: FW: Paul Harvey Story ...Probably Should Circulate This One...

-----Original Message-----
From: Ronnie Giron <ronniegiron@yahoo.com>
To: Carl Swan <rcantrell@potomacenergy.com>; Georges Tadros
<georges.tadros@cima.qc.ca>; Cabell Tice <DTice55861@aol.com>; Stewart
McAdoo <smcadoo@evl.net>; Robert Missroon <rsroon@aol.com>; Filomena OLeary
<filomena@foleary.freeserve.co.uk>; Manuel Orantes <juancho629@juno.com>;
Daren Osborn <llerwin@aol.com>; Howard Osborn <hosborn@worldnet.att.net>;
Alessandro Petrini <petrini@proatec.com>; Ann Simmons
<asimmons@pearlriver.net>; Bill Simmons III <CopanLumber@aol.com>; Larry
Spears <larryspears@redshift.com>; Maria Araiza <araizam@valero.com>; Xavier
Arguello-Carrazo <inc.xac@mayanet.hn>; Roberto R Babun <babun@netsys.hn>;
Jim Douglas <douglasj@swbell.net>; Ricardo Escoto <rescoto@hn2.com>; Carlos
Giron <cgiron@mindspring.com>; Darron Giron <dgiron1@pdq.net>; Tito Giron
<Tito_Giron@ei.enron.com>
Date: Saturday, September 30, 2000 8:41 AM
Subject: Fwd: FW: Paul Harvey Story ...Probably Should Circulate This One...

>
>Note: forwarded message attached.
>
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Yahoo! Photos - 35mm Quality Prints, Now Get 15 Free!
>http://photos.yahoo.com/

X-Apparently-To: ronniegiron@yahoo.com via web512.mail.yahoo.com
X-Track: 1: 40
Received: from 154.236.vwebs.com  (EHLO mail.rabey.com) (208.247.236.154)  by
mta326.mail.yahoo.com with SMTP; 29 Sep 2000 13:23:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by RABEY01 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id <SQYXSJP1>;
Fri, 29 Sep 2000 16:14:36 -0400
Message-ID: <F18A61AAAF76D3119EC400508B4AB5734B47@RABEY01>
From: Kathy Atherton <KathyA@RABEY.com>
To: "'ronniegiron@yahoo.com'" <ronniegiron@yahoo.com>
Subject: FW: Paul Harvey Story ...Probably Should Circulate This One...
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2000 16:14:25 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C02A51.E34922B4"
Content-Length: 15139

?
-----Original Message-----
From: Wilensky, Bob  [mailto:Wilensky.Bob@LittonDSD.com]
Sent: Friday, September 29, 2000  3:58 PM
To: Hank Coolidge (E-mail); Palmertree,  Kenneth
Subject: Paul Harvey Story ...Probably Should Circulate This  One...

>> >  __________________________________
>> > Subject: Paul Harvey story
>> > Author:? Steven M Wilson at  NOOK003L
>> >  Date:??? 09/25/2000 10:26 AM
>> >
>> >
>>  >???????? It was a Paul Harvey story  >
>>  >????? > So please pass it on !!!!!!!
>> >?????  >
>>  >????? >
>> >????? > <<  >Conveniently Forgotten Facts ?? >? >
>> >????? >?  >Back in 1969 a group of Black Panthers decided that a fellow
>> black
>> >????? >?  >panther named Alex Rackley needed to die.? Rackley was
>suspected
>> >????? >?  >of disloyalty.? Rackley was first tied to a chair.? Once
safely
>>
>>  >????? >immobilized his 'friends' tortured him  for hours by, among other
>>  >????? >? >things, pouring boiling water  on him.
>>  >????? >? >
>> >????? >?  >When they got tired of torturing Rackley, Black Panther
member
>>  >????? >? >Warren Kimbo took Rackley  outside and put a bullet in his
head.
>>  >????? >? >Rackley's body was later found  floating in a river about 25
>miles
>> >????? >?  >north of New Haven, Conn.? Perhaps at this point you're
curious
>> >????? >?  >as to what happened to these Black Panthers.? In 1977, that's
>> only
>> >????? >?  >eight years later, only one of the killers was still in jail.
>> >?????  >? >
>>  >????? >? >The shooter, Warren Kimbro,  managed to get a scholarship to
>>  >???????? Harvard.
>> >????? >?  >He later became an assistant dean at Eastern Connecticut
State
>>  >????? >? >College.? Isn't that  something? As a '60s radical you can
pump
>a
>> >?????  >? >bullet into someone's head, and a few years later, in the
same
>>  >???????? state, you can become an  assistant college dean!? Only in
>America!
>> >????? >?  >
>>  >????? >? >Erica Huggins was the lady who  served the Panthers by boiling
>the
>>  >????? >? >water for Mr. Rackley's  torture.? Some years later Ms.
Huggins
>>  >????? >? >was elected to a California  School Board.
>>  >????? >? >
>> >????? >?  >How in the world do you think these killers got off so easy?
>> >?????  Maybe
>>  >????? >? >it was in some part due to the  efforts of two people who came
>to
>>  >????? >? >the defense of the  Panthers.? These two people actually went
so
>>  >????? >? >far as to shut down Yale  University with demonstrations in
>> >????? >?  >defense of the accused Black Panthers during their trial.
>> >????? >?  >
>>  >????? >? >One of these people was none  other than Bill Lan Lee. Mr.
Lee,
>or
>> >????? >?  >Lan Lee, as the case may be, isn't a college dean.? He isn't
a
>> >????? member
>> >?????  >? >of a California School Board. He is now head of the US
Justice
>> >????? >?  >Department's Civil Rights Division.? O.K., so who was the
other
>> >????? >?  >Panther defender?
>>  >????? >? >
>> >????? >?  >Is this other notable Panther defender now a school board
>member?
>>  >???????? Is this other Panther  apologist now an assistant college dean?
>> No,
>> >????? >?  >Neither!? The other Panther defender was, like Lee, a radical
>> >?????  >? >law student at Yale University at the time.? She is now  known
>as
>> >????? >?  >The "smartest woman in the world."
>> >????? >?  >
>>  >????? >? >She is none other than the  Democratic candidate for the US
>Senate
>> >????? >?  >from the State of New York----our lovely First Lady, the
>> >????? >?  >incredible Hillary Rodham Clinton.
>> >????? >?  >
>>  >????? >? >And now; as Paul Harvey says;  you know (the rest of the
story).
>> >?????  >? >Pass this on!? She deserves the press................
>> >?????  >? > ??????????????????????????????????????????????????
????????????????


I got a form that consultants sign, and I'll compare them.

Kay

From: Gregg Penman on 03/30/2001 01:08 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: FW: Form B

Here is the "Form B" that every employee signs.  I am not sure how helpful
this will be, but I wanted to make sure that whatever we ask the Enron
employees to sign is consistent, or at least not in conflict with, what they
have already signed.

Thanks - Gregg

----- Forwarded by Gregg Penman/Corp/Enron on 03/30/2001 01:07 PM -----

	Jeanie Slone/ENRON@enronXgate
	03/30/2001 10:52 AM

		 To: Gregg Penman/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: Form B

per my voice mail.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Sweet, Twanda
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2001 11:51
To: Slone, Jeanie
Subject: Form B

Twanda Sweet
Enron North America Corp.
EB3822
(713) 853-9402
twanda.sweet@enron.com


Thank you for your interest in career opportunities with Koch Industries,
Inc. We are pleased you would consider joining our dynamic,
entrepreneurial team.

Your resume has been received and entered into our electronic resume
database where it will be accessible by our recruiting staff.  We review
these resumes daily, actively searching for talented individuals to help
us grow.

You will not only be considered for the specific role you may have seen
advertised but your talents and background will be considered for all of
our open roles, even those not currently advertised.  If there,s a match,
we will contact you directly.

However, if you do not hear from us immediately, do not worry. Even if we
don,t have the perfect role for you today, we will keep your resume for
two years which allows us to consider you for future opportunities.

Would you like to receive announcements of future openings?  If so, please
sign up for our Career Agent notification at
http://www.kochcareers.com/career_agent.asp

Also, since you were intrigued enough to respond to our posting,  why not
tell others about us as well? They can visit us on the  Web at
http://www.kochcareers.com.  Or, you may send a personalized  e-mail
message containing the homepage link for Koch,s Career page by clicking
here  http://www.kochcareers.com/friend.asp

Thank you again for considering Koch in your career search.

Good luck and best wishes from the Koch Industries Selection Group.


In case you haven't already seen this:

El Paso Addresses the California Energy Situation  ( February 26, 2001 )
 HOUSTON, Feb. 26 /PRNewswire/ -- El Paso Corporation (NYSE: EPG)
reaffirmed today its continuing commitment to work with all parties
involved to help improve California's energy situation. "We are surprised
to see continuing misinformation in the media concerning El Paso's
involvement in California," said Norma Dunn, senior vice president of
Corporate Communications and External Affairs at El Paso Corporation. "We
would like to take this opportunity to clarify the record."  The
significant increase in electricity demand at a time when available power
supplies are short has caused a sharp climb in the price of power, which
has in turn increased the price of natural gas used to generate
electricity. High natural gas prices are, therefore, an effect rather than
a cause of the power shortage.  Allegations that natural gas prices were
deliberately manipulated by withholding capacity on the El Paso Natural Gas
pipeline overlook critical facts and are demonstrably untrue. It is not
possible for any holder of capacity on the El Paso Natural Gas pipeline to
cause a significant increase in California gas prices by refusing to use
that capacity. The El Paso Natural Gas pipeline is required by law to post
the availability of any unused capacity on its public bulletin board and is
obligated to sell that capacity for no more than the published tariff rate
found to be just and reasonable by the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission. All capacity held by El Paso Merchant Energy on the El Paso
Natural Gas Pipeline has been used or made available for use by others to
serve California and other Western markets.  Allegations that there was a
"conspiracy" in 1996 to limit new interstate pipeline capacity into
California are absolutely refuted by facts that no one can challenge. The
facts show that all new pipelines considered during the 1990s were either
built or were not viable projects because they lacked sufficient customer
support to justify their construction. For example, despite years of
marketing efforts by Tenneco, not a single potential customer could be
induced to make the sort of binding commitment required for the proposed
Altamont project to proceed. For that reason alone, it was ultimately
dropped. In 1996, according to estimates, there were between one and two
billion cubic feet per day (Bcf/d) of excess natural gas transportation
capacity on existing interstate pipelines serving California. Indeed, it
was misplaced reliance on the continuing availability of such excess
capacity that prompted the California Public Utilities Commission to
encourage PG&E, SoCal Edison, and SoCal Gas, beginning in 1996 and
continuing into 1998, to relinquish over 1.5 Bcf/d of firm transportation
capacity on the El Paso Natural Gas pipeline. Processes are now under way
to assess present demand and support for new interstate pipeline capacity
into California, and El Paso intends to do its part to help satisfy
whatever needs may be established today.  As recently as last year, there
were periods when significant quantities of unused capacity were available
on the El Paso Natural Gas pipeline that were not necessary to meet demands
at that time. Notwithstanding its availability, this capacity was not used
by shippers to California to fill in- state natural gas storage facilities
for future use. If California had taken advantage of the opportunity in
2000 to store the same volumes of natural gas that had been stored in 1999,
reliance on the spot market would have been reduced and the steep rise in
prices at the California border could have been substantially mitigated or
avoided.  It is now widely recognized that the California "energy crisis"
was caused by the inability of the supply of power available in California
to keep pace with the state's economy and increased demand. A combination
of factors caused a sharp increase in power prices. First, the construction
of new power plants in California is a slow, difficult, and heavily
regulated process. As a result, the growing demand has far outstripped
in-state generating capabilities. Second, unfavorable precipitation and
increased out-of-state demand caused some of the hydroelectric power
normally relied on by California to become unavailable. Third, increased
demand for power in the western United States drove up prices that
California had to pay to out-of-state generators. Fourth, state policies
deregulated wholesale power prices but capped the rates paid by consumers,
leaving demand unrestrained and preventing utilities from recovering their
costs. Fifth, because rate caps prevented utilities from passing increased
costs to consumers, the utilities' creditworthiness was impaired, causing
supplemental power needed during peak periods to become more difficult and
expensive to purchase. Sixth, the early and greater-than-normal use of
peaking units-plants that are designed to only operate under peak demand
conditions-necessitated unscheduled maintenance, rendering them unavailable
at critical times. Seventh, during the final months of 2000, some power
plants were forced to shut down because increased usage exhausted their air
emissions credits. Eighth, a warm summer followed by an early onset of cold
weather further drove up demand for power. Finally, the increased power
costs in California could have been substantially mitigated through
long-term power contracts and less reliance on the volatile short-term
power market.  "California is currently in a difficult position, but now
has the opportunity to refine its regulatory model and craft a long-term
energy policy," said Dunn. "El Paso has been one of the largest suppliers
of energy to California for more than 50 years, and we are actively
participating with all parties in California to be a part of a long-term,
stable solution to California's energy needs."  El Paso Corporation, the
largest and most broadly based natural gas company in the world, spans the
energy value chain from wellhead to electron. With an enterprise value in
excess of $50 billion, El Paso is a leader in every phase of the natural
gas industry. The company owns and operates a significant portion of the
North American natural gas delivery grid, operates the fastest growing,
most sophisticated energy merchant group, and is the nation's third largest
natural gas producer. El Paso, a leader in risk management techniques, is
focused on maximizing shareholder value, transforming existing markets, and
speeding the development of new markets. Visit El Paso at www.epenergy.com.
 CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS  This release
includes forward-looking statements and projections, made in reliance on
the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act
of 1995. The company has made every reasonable effort to ensure that the
information and assumptions on which these statements and projections are
based are current, reasonable, and complete. However, a variety of factors
could cause actual results to differ materially from the projections,
anticipated results or other expectations expressed in this release. While
the company makes these statements and projections in good faith, neither
the company nor its management can guarantee that the anticipated future
results will be achieved. Reference should be made to the company's (and
its affiliates') Securities and Exchange Commission filings for additional
important factors that may affect actual results.

Bob Brooks
GPCM Natural Gas Market Forecasting System
http://gpcm.rbac.com


Tana:  I've already spoken with Clem this morning and he is on board with
this form.  The changes we are making are not substantive so let's make 'em
(marked in yellow on the hard copy I've delivered to you) and get this signed
right away.  Clem is going on vacation Friday.  We should also email a copy
to Jack Foley when the revisions are made.  PG&E will send execution copies
to me.  The paralegal handling this is Maryann Friel at (415) 973-4599.
Thanks for your help.  Sara
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 05/15/2000 11:02 AM -----

	"Foley, Jack" <JRFc@pge.com>
	05/01/2000 11:51 AM

		 To: "'Sara Shackleton'" <Sara.Shackleton@enron.com>
		 cc: Rod Nelson <Rod.Nelson@enron.com>, "Pearce, Karola (Law)" <KKP2@pge.com>
		 Subject: RE: Enron Corp. guaranty in favor of PG&E

Sara,

I am attaching our guarantee format for your review.  Please note that I
have inserted the "cap" at $ 10 million.

If you have any questions, please call me.

-----Original Message-----
From: Sara Shackleton [mailto:Sara.Shackleton@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, April 28, 2000 1:49 PM
To: Foley, Jack
Cc: Rod Nelson
Subject: Enron Corp. guaranty in favor of PG&E

Jack:  I just spoke with Karola and she tells me that you want to talk about
the
guaranty.  I didn't recall if you had ever reviewed our proposed format.
Also,
I am aware that Enron Corp. previously issued a "General Guarantee
Agreememt" on
behalf of Enron North America Corp. (formerly, Enron Capital & Trade
Resources
Corp.) on January 28, 1998.  Which format are you interested in using?  Our
cap
for financial transactions with PG&E is, I believe, $10 million.  Please
give me
a call as I am the first point of contact for negotiating the guaranty.
Thanks.
Sara

 - EnronGnt.doc


---------------------- Forwarded by Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT on 08/31/2000 07:56
PM ---------------------------

Susan M Scott
08/31/2000 07:52 PM
To: lnmay@aol.com
cc:
Subject: Reports2


Carrie,

Thanks.

Vince

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Robert, Carrie   On Behalf Of experience Enron,
Sent:	Thursday, June 07, 2001 5:26 PM
To:	Kaminski, Vince J
Cc:	Crenshaw, Shirley
Subject:	Norsk Hydro Evalutions

The results are in and the Norsk Hydro visitors were very satisfied with their Enron experience overall.  Further results are enclosed.  Let me know if you would like any further detail.

Thank you again for your participation in this visit.

Carrie Robert
Manager, Enron Corp Marketing Services
713-853-3522

 << File: Norsk Hydro Resutls - Kaminski.doc >>


Kay,

I changed your edit to Exhibit A-1 to show that we're burning natural gas,
not liquid fuel.

Other than that, looks good.

Lee

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 12:21 PM
To: Johnson, Lee L (PS, GE AEP)
Subject: GE Turbine Contract Insertion Language

I hope this is the last thing.  Here's the latest version of the contract
sans these insertions.

(See attached file: Salmon Energy Agreement - Version 5.DOC)
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/23/2001 12:14
PM ---------------------------

Kay Mann
04/19/2001 03:06 PM

To:   lee.johnson@ss.ps.com, kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com
cc:   Stephen Thome/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jake Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject:  GE Turbine Contract Insertion Language

Here's what Delta would like in the Salmon break out contract.  How does it
look to you?

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/19/2001 03:02
PM ---------------------------

"Richard Vicens" <rvicens@deltapower.com> on 04/19/2001 03:12:54 PM

To:   <Stephen.Thome@enron.com>, <kay.mann@enron.com>,
      <CCampbell@KSLAW.com>
cc:   "Lang, Gregory F." <gregorylang@paulhastings.com>, "PARKER, Isabel"
      <isabel.parker@freshfields.com>, "Anthony Harrington"
      <aharrington@deltapower.com>

Subject:  GE Turbine Contract Insertion Language

(See attached file: Adjustment Language.DOC)

 - Salmon Energy Agreement - Version 5.DOC


Richard has agreed to pay for Matt's visit, so here's the schedule so far:
Kirstee  All of July, all of September. (Kirstee's personal commitments mean
she needs to be in the UK for August.)
Ben  All of October.   (No crossover with Kirstee, ensures VaR/Credit cover
in London office.)
Steve  2-3 weeks in July, first 3 weeks of September.
      (No crossover with Matt, ensures power cover in London office.)
Matt  A couple of weeks in August. (Preferably the hottest ones.)
Anjam  To be arranged at Anjam and Houston's mutual convenience.

---------------------- Forwarded by Steven Leppard/LON/ECT on 04/28/2000
04:19 PM ---------------------------

Steven Leppard
04/28/2000 10:15 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dale Surbey/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Anjam Ahmad/LON/ECT@ECT, Benjamin Parsons/LON/ECT@ECT, Kirstee
Hewitt/LON/ECT@ECT, Matthew D Williams/LON/ECT@ECT, Steven
Leppard/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: This summer's Houston visits

Vince, Dale

Here are our proposals for Houston visits from our group:
Kirstee  All of July, all of September. (Kirstee's personal commitments mean
she needs to be in the UK for August.)
Ben  All of October.   (No crossover with Kirstee, ensures VaR/Credit cover
in London office.)
Steve  2-3 weeks in July, first 3 weeks of September.
Anjam  To be arranged at Anjam and Houston's mutual convenience.
Matt  Not a permanent Research Group member.  I'm asking Richard's group to
pay for his visit, probably in August.

Steve


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 04/20/2000 09:18
AM ---------------------------

dkinney@columbiaenergygroup.com on 03/31/2000 09:07:48 AM
To: " - *Kevin.Ruscitti@enron.com" <Kevin.Ruscitti@enron.com>, " -
*chris.germany@enron.com" <chris.germany@enron.com>
cc: " - *cfrankl2@enron.com" <cfrankl2@enron.com>, " -
*joan.veselack@enron.com" <joan.veselack@enron.com>, " - *vversen@enron.com"
<vversen@enron.com>, " - *cindy.vachuska@enron.com"
<cindy.vachuska@enron.com>, " - *cora_pendergrass@enron.com"
<cora_pendergrass@enron.com>, " - *mmitche2@enron.com" <mmitche2@enron.com>,
" - *scott.goodell@enron.com" <scott.goodell@enron.com>, " -
*steve.gillespie@enron.com" <steve.gillespie@enron.com>, " -
*cgarcia@enron.com" <cgarcia@enron.com>, " - *despey@enron.com"
<despey@enron.com>, " - *joann.collins@enron.com" <joann.collins@enron.com>
Subject: CES Daily March Requirements for 3/31, 4/1 thru 4/3

The attached file contains our daily volume requirements for   3/31 thru 4/3
.    There are two worksheets:  The one labelled with today's date contains
the
volumes that we need at each of the delivery points indicated.   The
schedulers
will want to check this sheet to see how much gas is needed at a specific
point.    The AGL volumes are not current and should be ignored.

The sheet labelled 'Daily Change' shows the change (increase +/decrease -) in
the requested daily volume relative to a prior value.  For the current gas
day,
the change is an intra-day change and is calculated using the previous day's
volume request for the current day (e.g., If the current gas day is 3/28, then
the change is computed with respect to the 3/27 request for 3/28).  For
tomorrow's gas day and any subsequent ones shown, the change is computed using
the First-of-the-month volumes requested for those days.  (e.g., If today is
3/28, then the change for 3/29, 3/30, etc. is computed with respect to the
first-of-the-month volumes for those days.)   This sheet should be useful in
determining prices for daily changes in gas volumes that we take or turn back.

Doug Kinney
Ph:  703-561-6339
Fax:  703-561-7317

 - 03-31-00daily volsAM.xls


Subject matter

1 Argentina status update and feedback
2 M F Guerriero future plans discussion


Deal had no broker - 531846 has been changed to reflect APB as broker.

Thanks,
Kate

Kerri Thompson@ENRON
02/26/2001 02:35 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: apb

missing deal
trader?
sell mirant
28th
25 mw
195.00
mid c


Sorry guys, I have more questions.

For Dec 2001, how many producers were supplying this gas for ENA?  for EES? (doesn't have to be exact)

If possible, how many meter's are there supplying this gas?

I'm trying to put together information for the BTRC to show how detailed this activity is.  If someone from the BTRC just looked at the total volume, the price we need to pay the producer, and the price we can get for this gas today, the BTRC may decide that we need to pay the producers and sale the gas.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Germany, Chris
Sent:	Thursday, May 23, 2002 1:33 PM
To:	Price, Wade R.; Bussell l, Kathryn
Subject:	Dominion Producers

Hey team.  I'm putting some high level information together about the Dominion Producers and I have a couple questions.

First, the worksheet.
I'm using the information Dominin Fed X'd to us 2 weeks ago.
Allocation Balance Report by production month.  The monthy receipt volume net of fuel in columns B through D on the worksheet.
Imbalance Signoff Sheet by accounting month.  The accumulated Dt Imbalance is in columns F through G on the worksheet.
Allocation Balance Report.  The total adjustment quanity by contract by accounting month is in columns J through L on the worksheet.

Questions
1.   The Dec 2001 receipt volumes seem very low.  I'm sure that high line pressure was keeping most of the production volume from flowing.  Did we lose any producers between Nov and Dec, before the gas flowed?

2.  I am assuming that most of this gas was priced at Index.  Do you agree?

Let me know if you have questions.  I'll probably have a few more for you two.

thanks

 << File: ProducerAnalysis.xls >>


Thanks,  we have it wrong in the system.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Prebon Energy has sent you an invitation from Sendomatic.com!

To view your invitation click the web address below or copy and paste it into your web browser:
http://www.sendomatic.com/servlets/v?e=63313&u=759049

If you are having trouble viewing the above web address, visit
http://www.sendomatic.com/servlets/l?u=jane.m.tholt@enron.com
and create an account to view the events you have received.

Hope you have fun!

--

P.S. If you'd like to send your own personalized invitations or announcements go to http://www.sendomatic.com


Please see attached per your request

Mike D.


Many thanks.

When I first started in the E & C bidness all our company did was cost plus
work.  I may have some old exhibits about how the mulitplier was used to
capture benefits and burdens, both for field people and home office.  You
know the goal is to never create an original document!

Kay

Davidlu@nepco.com on 02/01/2001 12:23:43 PM
To: Kay.Mann@ENRON.com,
IMCEAEX-_O=ENRON_OU=NA_CN=FOREIGN+20CONTACTS_CN=NEPCO_CN=DLUND@ENRON.com,
john.schwartzenburg@enron.com, John.G.Rigby@ENRON.com, Peter.Nassab@ENRON.com
cc: Mark.Bernstein@ENRON.com, jude.rolfes@enron.com, STEVED@nepco.com,
MikeR@nepco.com, danielh@nepco.com, Patricia@nepco.com

Subject: RE: Cost plus contract for Co Op City

Kay,  I got your message this morning.  Enjoy the big apple.  I presume you
got my mark ups on the term sheet.  I am investigating with the NEPCO folks
if they have any particular form of cost plus contract.  JWVS just informed
me he had one that he will forward to me.  I know from past history that
NEPCO is not set up from an accounting viewpoint to give a lot of detailed
breakdown of costs in terms of labor hours, burdens and benefits since they
are calculated and charged to a project based on assignment of people.

I'll stay in touch.

David H. Lund, Jr.
Assistant General Counsel
National Energy Production Corporation
11831 North Creek Parkway N.
Bothell, WA 98011
425-415-3138
Fax: 425-415-3032
David.Lund@nepco.com or davidlu@nepco.com

      -----Original Message-----
      From:   Mann, Kay [mailto:Kay.Mann@ENRON.com]
      Sent:   Thursday, February 01, 2001 10:07 AM
      To:   Lund, David; Schwartzenburg, John; Rigby, John;
Nassab, Peter
      Cc:   Bernstein, Mark; Rolfes, Jude
      Subject:   Cost plus contract for Co Op City
      Importance:   High

      Gentlemen,

      As Dave and John know, I'm working on a deal for ENA (and
with Jude)
      which has as one aspect a cost plus EPC contract for the
construction of
      a power plant.  We need to put together the T's and C's for
a cost plus
      contract, and since it is possible that NEPCO might be the
contractor, I
      wanted to use something that is acceptable to NEPCO.  I will
then take
      the laboring oar in order to get a working draft prepared
for this
      project.

      As always, I'm on a short time frame, so your response would
be
      appreciated.

      Thanks,

      Kay


Had to split the document.   This was the message that came back to me..  The
message could not be delivered because the remote server returned the
following error:
  552 Message exceeds permitted size

The other will follow.  Please advise when received.  Thanks.

 <<003732482.NYW>>

Carmen Ferrer
Global Energy & Project Finance Group
Credit  First
Suisse  Boston
11 Madison Avenue
New York, NY 10010
212-325-2867
212-325-8322
carmen.ferrer@csfb.com

This message is for the named person's use only.  It may contain
confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information.  No
confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.
If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all
copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the
sender.  You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute,
print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended
recipient. CREDIT SUISSE GROUP and each of its subsidiaries each reserve
the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks.  Any
views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except
where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state
them to be the views of any such entity.
Unless otherwise stated, any pricing information given in this message is
indicative only, is subject to change and does not constitute an offer to
deal at any price quoted.
Any reference to the terms of executed transactions should be treated as
preliminary only and subject to our formal written confirmation.

 - 003732482.NYW


Attached are revised Phone & Room Numbers and Gas Logistics Directory By Teams.
Let me know if you find any mistakes and forward to anyone that I missed.
	Tnx, Alma G.


ELECTION INTEGRITY UPDATE

Keep up the fight!
The walls are closing in on Vice President Al Gore. Both
the U.S. Supreme Court and the Leon County Circuit
Court in Florida ruled against Al Gore in two separate legal
battles.  First, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the
Florida Supreme Court had no legal justification for
extending the deadline for manual recounts.  The full text
of the Supreme Court decision is posted on our website at
http://www.electionintegrity.com/home/A363.cfm

The second blow to Gore came when Leon County Circuit
Court Judge N. Sanders Sauls ruled against his plea to
further extend the manual recounts.

Here's what Judge Sauls had to say:

"In order to contest election results . . . the plaintiff
must show that but for the irregularity or inaccuracy claim,
the result of the election would have been different and he
or she would have been the winner," said Sauls. "In this
case, there is no credible statistical evidence ...that the
results of the statewide election in in the state of Florida
would be different from the results certified by the election
canvassing board."

In the aftermath of these latest decisions, Mr. Gore has two
choices: drag on the fight to overturn the election in a
vain attempt to  discredit George W. Bush's legitimacy as
President-elect -- or, for the good of the people, concede.

As you know, Election Integrity is collecting online letters
to Al Gore urging him to concede.  Over 220,000 Americans
have signed in less than a week.   If you haven't already --
please go to our site and do it now.

We are so close to the end of this mess.  Let's keep up the
pressure.  PLEASE forward this message to your friends and
family and ask them to urge Al Gore to do the right thing
for our country -- CONCEDE.

For Election Integrity,

Bruce Eberle

PS: Check out http://www.electionintegrity.com/home/A363.cfm
for all of the latest breaking news on the election
controversy.

============================================================
If you would no longer like to receive information from
ElectionIntegrity2000.com, reply to this e-mail and place
the word UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line.
============================================================


very interesting.... i've been looking for new activities.  maybe i was born
to be a knight

"Jennifer White" <jenwhite7@zdnetonebox.com> on 10/26/2000 12:45:17 PM
To: John.Arnold@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Re: good morning

http://www.kofc.org/ (I can find anything!)

It looks like they are an organization of Catholic men (with 'Vote for
life' on their web site - scarry!).  I'm voting at a middle school.
Let's hope I don't get shot.

---- John.Arnold@enron.com wrote:
>
> my polling location is the knights of columbus hall.
>
> what exactly is a knight of columbus?
>
>

___________________________________________________________________
To get your own FREE ZDNet Onebox - FREE voicemail, email, and fax,
all in one place - sign up today at http://www.zdnetonebox.com