Jeff - did you:
1) okay this for Cynthia to ticket already?
2) need the seat assignments for Prentice's booking?

I'm not sure what you've done here on your own.

Joseph
---------------------- Forwarded by Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron on 07/30/2001 02:34
PM ---------------------------

Cynthia Biggs <cynthia.biggs@travelpark.com> on 07/30/2001 02:13:43 PM
To: "'jeff.dasovich@enron.com'" <jeff.dasovich@enron.com>
cc: "'joseph.alamo@enron.com'" <joseph.alamo@enron.com>

Subject: review and approve jeff dasovich 2aug travel - must ticket today
for fare

                                          AGENT CB/CB BOOKING REF Y8T96W

                                          DASOVICH/JEFF
                                          ENRON CORP
                                          101 CALIFORNIA ST STE 1950
  ENRON CORP                              SAN FRANCISCO CA 94111
                                          MAIL ETKT RCPT

  DATE:  JUL 30 2001

SERVICE               DATE  FROM           TO             DEPART  ARRIVE

UNITED AIRLINES       02AUG SAN F CA       NEW YORK NY    915A    549P
UA 862     B          THU   SAN FRANCISCO  JOHN F KENNEDY
           NON SMOKING      TERMINAL N     TERMINAL 6
                            BREAKFAST/SNACK               NON STOP
                            RESERVATION CONFIRMED         5:34 DURATION
                  AIRCRAFT: BOEING 767-200/200ER
                            SEAT 16E NO SMOKING CONFIRMED DASOVICH/JEFF(I
                          AISLE SEAT CONFIRMED

HOTEL                 02AUG W HOTEL NEW YORK
                      05AUG 541 LEXINGTON AVENUE
                            NEW YORK, NY 10022
                            UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
                            TELEPHONE: 212-755-1200
                            FAX: 212-319-8344
                            TELEX: NONE
                            CONFIRMATION: C575237015
                            REFERENCE: C1QENR
                            DOUBLE ROOM QUEEN SIZE BED
                            RATE: ENR USD 269.00 PER NIGHT
                            GUARANTEE GIVEN
                            ENRON RATE NON SMKNG
             TO AVOID BILLING CANCEL 24HRS PRIOR TO ARRIVAL.

UNITED AIRLINES       05AUG NEW YORK NY    SAN F CA       415P    731P
UA 5       B          SUN   JOHN F KENNEDY SAN FRANCISCO
           NON SMOKING      TERMINAL 6     TERMINAL N
                            DINNER                        NON STOP
                            RESERVATION CONFIRMED         6:16 DURATION
                  AIRCRAFT: BOEING 767-200/200ER
                            SEAT 22B NO SMOKING CONFIRMED DASOVICH/JEFF(I
                          AISLE SEAT CONFIRMED

MISCELLANEOUS         03DEC HOUSTON TX
                      MON   ** THANK YOU FOR USING THE TAP **

RESERVATION NUMBER(S)  UA/LMF96O

DASOVICH/JEFF  S0C0011R1000

UA  FREQUENT FLYER UA369321854
*******************************************
INTL TVLRS: CARRY SOS WALLET CARD W/ENRON ASSISTANCE INFO
CALL SOS MEDICAL EMERGENCY:IN U.S 800 523-6586
CALL SOS MEDICAL EMERGENCY:INTL 215 245-4707 (COLLECT)
*********************************************
HADV THE AIRLINE OF YOUR FREQUENT FLYER NUMBER
THIS IS THE PASSENGER RECEIPT FOR YOUR ELECTRONIC TICKET.
PLEASE CHECK-IN WITH PHOTO IDENTIFICATION AND WITH
EITHER (1) THIS RECEIPT OR (2) YOUR CONFIRMATION NUMBER.
YOUR ETKT CONFIRMATION NUMBER IS: LMF96O
***************************************************
TICKET PRICE IS 1636.80 ROUNDTRIP REFUNDABLE
THIS IS AN ADVANCE PURCHASE FARE THAT REQUIRES
TRAVEL ON THESE SPECIFIC DATES AND FLIGHTS.
CHANGES ARE SUBJECT TO AVAILABILITY AND REQUIRE
AT LEAST 3 DAYS ADVANCE NOTICE
ALL FARES ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE UNTIL TICKETED/PURCHASED


There's a meeting with a cast of characters to discuss the Westinhouse
warranty issues.  It is tomorrow (Thurs) at 1230.  Do you have any interest
in sitting in?

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 08/23/2000 01:06
PM ---------------------------

John Normand@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
08/23/2000 01:03 PM
To: Mitch Robinson@Enron, Mark Dobler/NA/Enron@Enron, Ross
Newlin/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John
Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Scott
Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kay Mann@ENRON, Bob
Greene/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Dennis
Alexander/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Gavin
Gaul/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Brian D
Barto/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: Westinghouse/Gleason Meeting Agenda

The proposed agenda for tomorrow's meeting is as follow:

Low frequency sound issue
Megawatt limit @ 182 Mw
Use of evap cooler
Heat Rate deficiency
Late equipment deliveries

We can also talk about Wheatland performance.

Let me know if there is anything else we need to add to the agenda.

Thanks,   John


- CRUISE~1.DOC


---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 03/16/2001
05:54 PM ---------------------------

kpolozie@mwe.com@mwe.com on 03/16/2001 05:52:48 PM
To: YYaish@exchange.ml.com, Janice.R.Moore@enron.com, sshackl@enron.com,
TeiglandL@sullcrom.com, gilbergd@sullcrom.com, LMcMurray@exchange.ml.com
cc: ppantano@mwe.com, rpaul@mwe.com, daron@mwe.com, darezina@mwe.com
Subject: Transfer and Assumption Agreement

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Attached please find the revised Transfer and Assumption Agreement.  Please
note
that in the interest of time I am sending this document to all parties
simultaneously, thus there may be additional comments.  For your convenience,
I
am attaching both a clean copy and a marked version showing changes from the
most recent draft you received.

Best regards,

Kate Polozie

Katarina B. Polozie
McDermott, Will & Emery
kpolozie@mwe.com
(202) 756-8130
(See attached file: WDC99_406563_1.DOC)

(See attached file: WDC99_406261_5.DOC)

******************************************************************************
*******

This message is a PRIVATE communication.   If you are not the intended
recipient, please do not read, copy, or use it, and do not disclose it to
others.  Please notify the sender of the delivery error by replying to this
message, and then delete it from your system.  Thank you.
******************************************************************************
*******

For more information on McDERMOTT, WILL & EMERY please visit our website at:
http://www.mwe.com/

 - WDC99_406563_1.DOC
 - WDC99_406261_5.DOC


Gerald,

I have revised the letter slightly to address it to Randy Curry and will send
it out from here.

Thanks for the effort.

Brian

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Nemec, Gerald
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 7:30 PM
To: Redmond, Brian
Cc: Belflower, Rusty; Gray, Barbara; Cocavessis, Nick; Owen, David
Subject: Bridgeline Response

Brian,  Attached is our response to Bridgeline's issue list (revised based on
our meeting) with a short cover letter.  I addressed the cover letter from
you to Robert Morgan.  If that is not correct let me know.  I am sending a
hard copy of these docs for your signature.  Let me know if you have any
questions.

 << File: Enron Response1.doc >>  << File: Bridgeline Cover Letter.doc >>


Steve:

You might also want to take a look at the  UK Minister for Trade and
Industry's speech at the same conference- I already sent it to Mark
Schroeder.

?Regards,

Lauren

(See attached file: UK Environment speech.doc)

From: Steven J Kean@ENRON on 10/16/2000 09:25 PM

Sent by:  Steven J Kean@ENRON

To:   Michael Terraso/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Kelly Kimberly/Enron
      Communications@Enron Communications, Lauren Goldblatt/NY/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject:  Fwd:Ford chairman calls climate change world's #1 issue

----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 10/16/2000 09:25 PM -----

                    Cynthia
                    Sandherr            To:
                                        cc:
                    10/16/2000          Subject:
                    12:48 PM

Joe and Tom:  Either Bill Ford is a major Democrat or this signals a major
shift which serves as a strong indicator that Congress will face new
pressures next Congress to address Global Warming.  This is truly a
remarkable speech.

FORD PREDICTS END OF CAR POLLUTION
The Independent (UK)
6 October 2000

Internet:
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/UK/Environment/2000-10/ford061000.shtml

The 100-year reign of the polluting internal combustion engine is coming to
an end, Bill Ford, chairman of the Ford Motor Company, said yesterday. It
will soon be replaced in motor vehicles by the hydrogen fuel cell, which
emits no pollution whatsoever and so can reduce the build-up of greenhouse
gases causing climate change, Mr. Ford, great-grandson of the company's
founder, Henry Ford, told the Greenpeace Business Conference in London.

In a remarkable speech from a motor manufacturer, in which he proclaimed
his
own environmental credentials, Mr. Ford, 43, accepted that the automobile
had
had a serious negative impact on the environment, and that his industry had
wrongly played down the threat from global warming.  And the head of the
world's second biggest car company raised eyebrows even further when he
said
that he could foresee the day when people would not want to own cars, but
merely have access to mobility.

Detroit-born Mr. Ford, who has been chairman since the start of last year,
proclaimed that climate change was the most challenging issue facing the
world and that anyone who disagreed was "in denial". Ford itself had moved
on
from that position, he said. But he felt the Kyoto protocol, the 1997 pact
in
which the industrialised nations agreed to try to limit their emission of
greenhouse gases, would not provide deep enough cuts to halt global
warming.
Only the marketplace, making new technology widely available, could tackle
the problem.

A fuel cell creates energy by an electrochemical process similar to that in
a
battery: it lets hydrogen and oxygen react together to produce electricity
and water vapour. It does not run down or need recharging, working as long
as
the hydrogen fuel is available, but most importantly, it does not produce
any
CO2, the basic by-product of any carbon-based fuel such as oil, gas or
coal.
Every major car company in the world is throwing huge sums into developing
the technology: Ford is spending $1bn (?690m) between now and 2004, while
Daimler-Chrysler, regarded as the leader in the field, has spent $700m. All
the main manufacturers have prototype fuel-cell cars running and there is a
race to bring them to market. Honda and Toyota expect to do so in 2003,
while
Ford and Daimler-Chrysler are aiming at 2004.

"I believe fuel cells will finally end the 100-year reign of the internal
combustion engine," Mr. Ford said, adding that the technology was "the holy
grail" of the motor industry. Prophesying the demise of car ownership, he
said:  "The day will come when the whole notion of car ownership is
antiquated," he said. Mr. Ford was reflecting advanced motor industry
thinking, which suggests many people might not want to pay for a car of
their
own if they could be guaranteed mobility on demand from a local hire
network.

 - UK Environment speech.doc


Kenny, is there a fee for reserving Tom Bass Park?  If so, how much and are we going to split the cost?

I believe that I will have approximately 15 guests..

Tasha & her family----4 people ( 2 kids)
Hope & family  ---  4 people (1 child)
Me and My family -- 4 people (2 kids)
Ora & family --- 3 people ( no kids)
Angie - possible 3 to 4 people (possible 2 kids)
Todd's friends from Dynegy - (2 adults)

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ken.Cowan@dynegy.com@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Ken+2ECowan+40dynegy+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Tuesday, May 08, 2001 2:11 PM
To:	Mims, Patrice L.
Subject:	RE: Picnic

Not as many as we originally thought, Sandie is calling folks the next
couple of days.  We invited about 5-6 families/friends, Marsha maybe
invited about the same. I know Todd had a couple of DYN folks.   When its
all said and done we may have about 40 people including kids.  I'll know
for sure Friday.  Mom and Jackie will be down that weekend so they will be
there.


I presume you've seen this (you probably instigated it, in which case it's
come full circle!)...but just in case.

Regards

Paul
---------------------- Forwarded by Paul Simons/LON/ECT on 15/01/2001 16:24
---------------------------

Denis O'Connell
15/01/2001 11:33
To: Paul Simons/LON/ECT@ECT, Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT, Matthew
Dawson/LON/ECT@ECT, Adam Duguid/LON/ECT@ECT, Michael Slade/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Mark Evans/Legal/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: ISDA Electronic Document Available

---------------------- Forwarded by Denis O'Connell/LON/ECT on 15/01/2001
11:36 ---------------------------

"ISDA"<cgreasley@isda.org> on 13/01/2001 03:18:22
Please respond to cgreasley@isda.org
To: denis.o'connell@enron.com
cc:

Subject: ISDA Electronic Document Available

 - cover- non pcs.doc


DO NOT SELL OR BUY ANYTHING FOR ANYONE WITH THE PX AS A COUNTERPARTY REAL
TIME.  They are not certified by our credit department!  That includes CRC
and most definitely PUGET.  If you have any questions, call Bill, myself, or
Greg Wolf.  This is a serious matter and should not be ignored.


Sorry this didn't come earlier, but I just got my new computer this
afternoon. I
hope this helps you understand what's going on better. Call/see me if you have
any thoughts or questions. I also have a cd rom that is helpful in seeing the
network in action.

Regards,

Jason

(See attached file: ECI PP 1.ppt)                         (See attached file:
ECI PP 2.ppt)

 - ECI PP 1.ppt
 - ECI PP 2.ppt


I actually did get that last e-mail, but somehow it ended up buried at the
bottom of my in-box, just like so many other things. As far as the Blazer
ticket trade, I believe I bought a call from you on the Laker game, and you
bought the option from me on the Cavaliers - so I can choose to exercise on
12/13 at 7 p.m., and you can choose to exercise on 1/16 at 7 p.m. In other
words, no matter what happens, I'm going to both games. Got it?

As far as good stories from that night, I probably have the best, or at least
one of the more hilarious, of those circulating the floor. And no, it has
nothing to do with me. Ask me about it later, and I might be able to give it
up for firm delivery of a seat at next week's game. Think about it.

Kate


-----Original Message-----
From: Dana Ralston  [mailto:dralston@tombrown.com]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 8:35  AM
To: Alan & Lisa (E-mail); Butch & Lindra (E-mail); Christa  (E-mail); DCamp93268 (E-mail); Don & Shirley Quick (E-mail); Mike Griffith;  Sammy & Lorri Fields (E-mail)
Subject: FW: A  BLESSING

During the next 60 seconds, stop whatever you are  doing, and take this
opportunity. (Literally it is only  1 minute) All you have to do is the
following:
You simply say an "Our Father" for the person that sent you  this message:
Our Father who art in Heaven, Hallowed be Thy Name, Thy Kingdom  Come, Thy
Will be done, on Earth as it is in Heaven.  Give us this day our daily
bread and forgive us our  trespasses as we forgive those who trespass
against us,  and lead us not into temptation but deliver us from evil. For
Thine is the Kingdom and the power and the glory forever and ever,  Amen.
Next, you send this message to everyone you know. In awhile,  more people
will have prayed for you and you would have  obtained a lot of people
praying for others.
Next, stop and think and appreciate God's power in your life,  for doing
what you know is pleasing to him. If you are  not ashamed to do this,
follow the instructions. Jesus  said, "If you are ashamed of me, I will be
ashamed of  you before My Father"
If you are not ashamed, send this message...only if you believe.  "Yes, I
love my God. He is my fountain of Life and My  Savior. He keeps me going day
and night. Without Him, I  am no one. But with Him, I can do everything.
Christ is  my strength." This is a simple test. If you love God and you are
not ashamed of all the great things that He  has done for you, send this to
everyone you know, and  the person who sent it to you. Thanks!!!


Jonny how's it going?  Just wondering how the living arrangements are so
far?  I'm sure it's all still very blissful being as it's only been 3 days.
Hopefully you guys are doing okay!

Wasn't sure if your email address changed or not....get back to me when you
have a minute, let me know what's happening!

Glen


---------------------- Forwarded by Michelle Lokay/ET&S/Enron on 12/04/2000
09:55 AM ---------------------------

"Ott, Shana" <Ott.Shana@EPEnergy.com> on 12/04/2000 07:46:07 AM
To:
cc:

Subject: FW: Your Music

Listen to this.  You might have heard it last year on the radio.

Shana
>
>
>  <<Geroge Strait Christmas Cookies.mp3>>

******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it from El Paso
Energy Corporation are confidential and intended solely
for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
addressed. If you have received this email in error
please notify the sender.
******************************************************************

 - Geroge Strait Christmas Cookies.mp3


Frank, can you email us both a copy of the GTC that the counterparty is
seeing on the system.  Thanks!
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 05/02/2000 05:05 PM -----

	Marie Heard@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
	05/02/2000 04:23 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: EOL GTC's

Tana,

Will you send me the latest GTC's for bandwidth?

Thanks!


It has been a pleasure getting to know you.
Let me know if you need anything.

Dutch
HM 713-533-0882
Cell 713-301-2530

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rostant, Justin
Sent:	Friday, December 07, 2001 10:53 AM
To:	Zipper, Andy; May, Larry; Griffith, John; Maggi, Mike; Arnold, John; Quigley, Dutch; Rangel, Ina
Subject:	personal contact info

Guys, it has been a pleasure to be a part of this group and work with some of the smartest people at Enron. I enjoyed and appreciated the opportunity to work with all of you. I have learned a great deal and I hope that will give me a good foundation for the future.
Good luck to all of you and Happy Holidays

Home: 713-862-6397
Cell: 832-264-6333
email: jtrostant@yahoo.com


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 02/06/2001 03:30 PM -----

	David Parquet@ECT
	02/06/2001 02:40 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: La times

Long article...Mentions Calpine offering 1000 MW at slightly higher than 5.5
cents/kwh.

----- Forwarded by David Parquet/SF/ECT on 02/06/2001 12:37 PM -----

	"Cole Frates" <cfrates@azurix.com>
	02/06/2001 12:24 PM
	Please respond to cfrates

		 To: <dparque@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: La times

Tuesday, February 6, 2001 |  </cgi-bin/print.cgi> Print this story
</cgi-bin/print.cgi>

Davis Vows Plan for Edison, PG&E

 The governor says that by the end of the week he will have a strategy to
help the utilities avoid bankruptcy.

By DAN MORAIN and NANCY RIVERA BROOKS, Times Staff Writers

SACRAMENTO--Gov. Gray Davis said Monday he and legislative leaders would
have a plan by week's end to avert the bankruptcy of the state's two
biggest
utilities by trading ratepayer-backed bond money for utility assets.
"The drop-dead date is clearly Feb. 12," Davis said. That is when a federal
judge is set to hear a lawsuit by Southern California Edison, joined by
Pacific Gas & Electric, that could lead to sharp rate hikes for consumers
unless a rescue plan is in place.
Momentum has been building for a plan in which the state would get control
of the utility transmission lines in return for issuing bonds to give the
utilities a cash infusion.
But Senate President Pro Tem John Burton (D-San Francisco), who argues that
California should take control of the transmission grid, said he did not
share Davis' urgency to cut a deal this week.
The wrangling comes as the state faces the end early Wednesday of what
likely is the last federal emergency order requiring that independent power
generators sell electricity in California. The Bush administration insists
it will not extend the order.
"We're not even asking," Davis spokesman Steven Maviglio said.
Several such orders issued in the past two months have forced power
generators to keep electricity flowing to California, even though Edison
and
PG&E were unable to pay the skyrocketing wholesale costs of electricity.
But the federal emergency orders are less vital now that California has
relieved the utilities of having to buy power--at a cost to taxpayers of
roughly $45 million a day.
Davis, meanwhile, plans to announce today that California has entered into
its first long-term contracts to buy power from independent generators,
thereby beginning its shift away from the reliance on spot markets.
At least one firm, Calpine Corp., was on the verge late Monday of signing a
deal to provide the state with up to 1,000 megawatts for roughly 10 years.
One megawatt is enough to serve roughly 1,000 homes. The cost could not be
determined, but it is believed to be slightly above the 5.5 cents per
kilowatt-hour that Davis had hoped for.
"Clearly, we are no longer waiting for someone else to solve our problem or
do something to bail us out," Davis said at a Capitol news conference
Monday.
"We are doing everything within our power as a state to right this ship.
We're not waiting for someone to throw us a long pass. We're going to solve
it ourselves."
Davis said he will confer with Democratic and Republican legislative
leaders
this week to resolve the complex and controversial issue of providing "a
cash infusion to the utilities so they can be viable," in exchange for
utility assets.
The Democratic governor said he is not sure how the state will help the
financially hobbled companies. It may sell bonds, or guarantee bonds that
the utilities might sell.
Either way, the bonds would give the utilities cash to help them pay down
their debt, estimated at between $6 billion and $12 billion.
"It cannot be done without assistance from the state," Davis said.
Though Burton favors taking over the transmission grid, Davis supports
taking equity stakes in the companies themselves in the form of warrants,
similar to stock options. The warrants could be cashed in after the
utilities regain their stability and used to lower the cost of electricity
for consumers, or to soften future rate hikes.
"That state assistance, no matter what form it comes in, has a value,"
Davis
said. "It is my goal to make sure that whatever the state receives in
return
has comparable value."
Davis signed legislation last week allowing the state to sell an estimated
$10 billion worth of bonds to buy power in the future. The bonds would be
purchased by investors, who would be repaid over time by the ratepayers.
By selling bonds, the state in essence will be subsidizing consumers for
the
high prices of electricity in the first year or two. But consumers will pay
higher prices in later years when the cost of electricity is likely to drop
as more power plants are built.
In addition to selling bonds to pay for power in the future, Davis said,
the
state likely will sell bonds to help the utilities defray the past cost of
power.
State Treasurer Phil Angelides, who will oversee the bond process, said in
an interview that the state had little choice but to sell bonds for future
power purchases. But he said resolving the "past debts of the utilities" is
a tougher problem.
"There is no magic money here. Bonds require a repayment source," Angelides
said. "It needs to be a buyout versus a bailout."
The Democratic treasurer said that only after coming up with their own
reorganization plan should the utilities seek state assistance.
"At the end of the day, if there are some assets of value that we are
interested in as a buyer . . . that should be on the table."
Edison and PG&E have run up billions in debt in recent months as they paid
record high prices for wholesale power, yet were unable to pass on the full
cost of it to consumers.
On Monday, a federal judge in Los Angeles is scheduled to rule on Edison's
suit alleging that the California Public Utilities Commission must allow
the
utilities to pass on the multibillion-dollar cost of buying power.
Assemblyman Fred Keeley (D-Boulder Creek), among the lawmakers most
involved
in the Legislature's response to the energy crisis, said that if utilities
win the suit and are allowed to pass on the full cost of their power
purchases, consumers could be hit with an 86% rate increase.
"I don't think we can roll the dice and let that happen," said Keeley, who
along with Assembly Speaker Bob Hertzberg (D-Sherman Oaks) has been pushing
for an early settlement of the Edison lawsuit.
However, Burton, the Legislature's most influential member, shrugged off
the
Monday deadline.
"Trial courts rule. Appellate courts rule. Supreme Courts rule, and it's
three or four years down the road," Burton said.
In other developments Monday:
* Davis again used his emergency authority to claim $150 million worth of
contracts held by PG&E, shortly before they would have been taken by one of
the utility's creditors.
PG&E had defaulted on payments to the California Power Exchange, and the
entity, a sort of commodities market for electricity, wanted to auction off
the contracts. Davis took similar action with Edison contracts Friday.
The PG&E contracts will supply between 100 and 500 megawatts of electricity
for the remainder of 2001. The price of the power will be determined in
proceedings before the state Board of Control. But the state may find
itself
paying significantly more than the relative low prices specified in the
contracts.
* Edison revealed that one of its bank accounts was seized last month by a
creditor, General ReFinancial Products Corp., which contends it is owed
$8.8
million for early termination of a financial arrangement during the
utility's debt crisis.
Edison said in a filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
that it has asked the federal court that gave the creditor permission to
attach the account to reverse course and stop the action. The account, with
a New York bank, contains $1.5 million, Edison said.
Edison noted in the same filing that it had $1.36 billion in cash on
Monday,
but has defaulted on several million dollars' worth of debt payments and
has
"deferred" payments totaling $743 million through Monday to electricity
suppliers.
If the Rosemead utility had made all of its debt and electricity payments
as
they came due, it would have run out of cash last Friday, Edison said. In
contrast, its parent company, Edison International is paying all of its
bills.
* Shares of Edison International rose 22 cents to close at $13.23 per share
Monday and PG&E Corp. fell 14 cents to close at $13.60 per share. Both
trade
on the New York Stock Exchange.
Standard & Poor's, a large credit rating agency, reaffirmed that
California's strong rating remains on its "Credit Watch Negative" list
following Thursday's passage by the Legislature of a bill giving the state
Department of Water Resources $500 million more to buy electricity for the
state.
California's general obligation bonds carry a rating of double-A.
* S&P also downgraded to "D"--or junk-bond level--the "issuer credit
rating"
of the California Independent System Operator, reflecting the fact that the
utilities are no longer paying their electricity bills.
The downgrade does not affect any operating funds of Cal-ISO, which are
generated by transmission fees, and does not include debt issued by the
state for Cal-ISO, which retains "insured triple-A" and "A-1 plus" ratings.

(See attached file: Picture)
(See attached file: Picture)
(See attached file: Picture)
(See attached file: Picture)
(See attached file: Picture)
 - Picture
 - Picture
 - Picture
 - Picture
 - Picture


Thanks, Kerry.  That's what I thought.  Michelle

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Michelle Cash
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3823
Houston, Texas  77002
(713) 853-6401
michelle.cash@enron.com

This message may contain confidential information that is protected by the attorney-client and/or work product privileges.

	"Notestine, Kerry" <KNotestine@littler.com> 06/01/2001 10:36 AM 	   To: "'ben.herman@enron.com'" <ben.herman@enron.com>  cc: "'michelle.cash@enron.com'" <michelle.cash@enron.com>  Subject: Child Labor

Ben:

As we discussed, the regulations from the department of labor specifically
allow the employment of 14 to 16 year olds in non-hazardous employment.  The
regulations, however, restrict employment to 40 hours in a week, 8 hours in
a day, and between the hours of 7:00 am to 9:00 pm.  29 C.F.R. 570.35.
Thus, don't take the interns to a power plant and don't work them past 9:00
or the hours indicated and you should be ok.  Let me know if you have any
follow up questions.

Kerry E Notestine
Littler Mendelson, PC
1900 Chevron Tower
1301 McKinney Street
Houston, Texas 77010
713.652.4748
713.951.9212 (fax)
knotestine@littler.com
www.littler.com

----
This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to
postmaster@littler.com

Littler Mendelson, P.C.
http://www.littler.com


I will be on vacation from 11-15 to 11-28 returning on Wednesday the 29th.
If you have any questions please call Brenna Neves at  x31959.  Thanks,
Leslie


"If everybody is thinking alike, then somebody isn,t thinking.8  - George S.
Patton, Jr.

Keeping with our Mind,s Eye Madness week, be sure to check out the Enron Mind,
s Eye Motorcade
on Friday, April 27th from 11:30am to 1:00pm at the Big E Cafe.  This art car
convoy will spend the day visiting
Enron-designated stops in the community to promote innovation and
creativity.  Mirroring Enron,s innovation,
these artists think about the way things could be and are not limited by the
way things are.

Featuring:
Lunch by Escalantes Mexican Grille - choice of beef, chicken or veggie
fajitas with trimmings, dessert and a drink for $5.
Live salsa music will be provided by Tropicrew, featuring Enron,s own Ms.
Alex Villarreal as the lead singer.
Non-profit organizations represented will include the March of Dimes, SEARCH
and the Lupus Foundation of America.
Get lunch free if you're dressed "freaky"!

Word of the Day
Zeitgeist \TSYT-guyst; ZYT-guyst\, noun:  The spirit of the time; the general
intellectual & moral state or temper characteristic of any period of time.


Let's just assume I'll be out Friday afternoon.

From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 08/02/2000 11:16 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re:

I'm sure he gets that from you.  He'll be fine, just get him the help that he
needs.  Let me know about Friday when you decide.

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	08/02/2000 11:13 AM

		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re:

I suspect that there are several options.

He is such a sweet, cute, smart thing.  You will like him. He is very very
charming.

From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 08/02/2000 11:12 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re:

He can be helped though right?  Block out Friday afternoon?

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	08/02/2000 10:58 AM

		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re:

We've known, but is has gotten to be a bigger issue as he has gotten older.

From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 08/02/2000 10:53 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re:

Are you just finding out?  I know there are things that can be done to help
that situation.  Do you want me to block you out for Friday afternoon as
well.  You need to get this taken care of quickly for Michael's sake.

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	08/02/2000 10:40 AM

		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re:

Michael problems. He has ADD and some other lesser learning problems.  We are
going to meet  with the specialist next week.

I'm going to try to take off Friday afternoon as well.  We are thinking of
changing his school, and Neil and I need to go visit a new one.

HECTIC!

From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 08/02/2000 09:59 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re:

Are you ok?

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	08/01/2000 06:03 PM

		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject:

Please protect Thursday afternoon, August 10th for me.  I have some important
personal stuff to take care of.


?

Hi Folks,

First off, congratulations  on a great season.I assume if you,re  still in
the hunt this late in the year, you have to call 2000 a successful
campaign.? Enjoy it.? It,s an intense time and you can,t slack  off now but
it,s also important to enjoy the moment regardless of what happens  in the
next few weeks.? It,s tough  enough just to get to this point.?  Great work!

From my perspective it,s  interesting in that the actual number of folks who
read the material drops way  off this time of year.? But the  other side of
the coin is that the interest level of the ones still reading  shoots through
the roof.? There may  not be as many folks reading as there were in
September, but the ones that are  here are into in a big way!???

I,ll do my dead level best  to keep up my end of the bargain and provide the
best info I can all the way to  the week 17 games.? Lets get at  it.?

Joe

??

Matchups to Avoid and Exploit.?

Passing Game  Matchups.?? Here's how I see the matchups this  week.? Please
note, see the  cheatsheet online (will be available?late Wednesday evening
at?http://www.cheatsheets.net/week14sheet.htm?  ) ?for exactly where I rank
players and to determine who to start.? Just because one matchup may be more
favorable than another, that doesn't necessarily mean I'd start the player
with  the best matchup.? The matchup info  is meant to be just one more tool
in your box when it comes to deciding between  players.??

Note:? I,ve used the player stats sorted by  performance over the last four
weeks extensively in developing these write-ups.  Stats are provided by Mike
Hall,s excellent FLM League Management Software.? http://www.fflm.com/ for
more info.? The Fantasy Points Allowed by Position  numbers are from
ESPN.com.?

?

Here we go:

Locks:? These games heavily favor the Offense

New Orleans Passing Game  vs Bronco Defense???? I stuck my neck out a  bit
last week with QB Aaron Brooks but he came though for me.? This week, he
draws a great matchup with  a Denver defense that,s not been able to stop
anyone through the air.? Over the last four weeks, they rank # 31  in passing
yards allowed per game.?  Denver has averaged giving up 308 yards passing per
game over that  span.? With CB Ray Crockett out with  a torn hamstring, Jimmy
Spencer will fill in for him again this week.? He and Terrell Buckley can
definitely be  beaten. Brooks will focus on WR Joe Horn, his primary weapon
but  Willie Jackson refuses to fade away and is a solid option.? RB Chad
Morton catches the ball  pretty well out of the backfield.?  TE Aaron Glover
still is total non factor for Fantasy  purposes.? I'm doing my best to not
get  carried away with Brooks.? Keep telling yourself the young man has
exactly  2 games of NFL experience.? On the other hand, there comes a time
when you  take a leap and go with what you see with your own eyes.? This guy
isn't  playing like a 2 game rookie and the Denver defense is awful.?

St. Louis Passing Game vs  Carolina Defense?? I want to believe.? I believe
in Kurt  Warner and I believe he,ll get his Rams back on track.? As much as
anything, I believe you,ll  see Marshall Faulk at least see more action than
he saw last  week.? Warner,s an MVP but I think  it,s Faulk that makes this
team go.?  He creates so much havoc with the defense that must either commit
safeties to support the run which then opens the passing game.? If the
defense plays the pass, then  Faulk can kill them with the run or short
passes.? After last week, I,d be shocked if coach  Mike Martz doesn,t get
back to utilizing?his?star RB?more.? Kurt Warner makes his return and I,m
guessing he picks up where he left off.?  That,s not what you,d expect to
happen but Warner,s made a career of  exceeding expectations.? If he,s on
your roster, I think you have to go with him.? Especially against this
defense.? Carolina ranks # 30 in passing yards  allowed per game over the
last four weeks.?  For WRs, it,s always tough to pick.?  Isaac Bruce and
Torry Holt are the sure guys but honestly, Ricky Proehl,s  been on fire
lately.? Az-Zahir Hakim  is always worth a shot too.? Any one  of these guys
can go off.? TE Roland  Williams suffers with so many good receivers but he,s
a decent producer  too.

Atlanta Passing Game vs  Seattle Defense?? This one is a pure matchup play
as  Dan Reeves makes the move for starting?QB Doug Johnson over the  fading
Chris Chandler.? I,m not a  big fan of either but if you find yourself faced
with the prospect of starting a  Falcon QB, this is the week to do it if you,
re ever going to.? The Seahawks defense is less like a hawk  and more like an
albatross around Mike Holmgren,s neck.? They,re awful.? Over the last four
weeks, they rank # 29  in passing yards allowed per game.?  Good luck picking
the WR as Terrance Mathis has been  invisible lately while Shawn Jefferson is
making a  resurgence.? A few weeks ago, it was  Mathis who was hot while
Jefferson faded.?  If you made me pick one, I,d reluctantly go with
Jefferson.? TE Reggie Kelly did  catch 3 passes Sunday but I,m not counting
on him for too  much.

Pittsburgh Passing Game  vs Raider Defense?? Kor-DELL(Kor-DELL(Kor-DELL???
What brought this guy back  to life?? I dunno but you can bet  coach Bill
Cowher is going to do everything he can to keep it rolling.? Kordell Stewart
looks to be  playing with renewed confidence and we all know that so much of
the game at this  level is mental.? No one ever  doubted his physical
skills.? The  obvious spark seems to have been the benching of WR Plaxico
Burress and the inspired play of Hines Ward.? I think it,s ironic that Ward
was very  much a Kordell-like &Slash8 player in college at Georgia.? Bobby
Shaw is getting into the  act and producing from the WR slot and wonders of
wonders, TE Mark  Bruener caught a TD Sunday.? You  know things are changing
when Bruener gets in the endzone.? The Raiders are an extremely good
football team but stopping teams through the air is their Achilles  heel.

Cincinnati Passing Game  vs Cardinal Defense?? Another interesting aspect of
writing this column late in the season is that you can almost guess which
players to talk about as most Fantasy Teams still interested in December are
stocked with the obvious stars.?  QB Scott Mitchell likely doesn,t fall into
that &star8  category and I doubt many folks are faced with the decision to
start him this  week but if he,s your best QB, this might be your lucky
week.? First of all, let,s assume he gets the  knee ready to go.? This early
in the  week, that,s honestly a shaky assumption.?  We,ll know more later.?
But  if he can go, he could do some damage against an awful Cardinal
defense.? WR Peter Warrick could be a  decent play too although Aeneas
Williams is a solid cover guy.? He,s hard to count out though just  because
of his home run ability.?  Funny how I don,t see many people complaining
about his 40 times  now(? RB Corey Dillon is the  only other starter on this
team but we,ll catch up with him in the rushing  Matchups.

?

Prime Matchups:? These games favor the  Offense?

Arizona Passing Game vs  Bengal Defense?? Let,s be clear, I,m no Jake
Plummer fan but the truth of the matter is he,s got a pretty decent matchup
this week.? He,s reportedly making  good progress and should start Sunday.?
Partly because, he,s better, partly because Dave Brown was just  awful.?
&Worse than Plummer8 has a  nasty ring to it(? But this Bengal  pass defense
is pretty bad.? Over  the past four weeks, they rank # 26 in passing yards
allowed  per game.? WRs David Boston has the physical  tools to do some
damage and Frank Sanders has the experience to make an  impact.? Remember,
this is the unit  that made Pittsburgh look like the 1999 Rams last week.???

New York Jets Passing  Game vs Colts Defense?? The Jets have been up and down
a  bit but this week they could make some noise against a struggling
Indianapolis  defense.? The pathetic Colt pass  rush only has 4 sacks in the
last 4 games.?  QB Vinny Testeverde had a decent day in their last matchup
with  271 yards and 1 TD.? WR Wayne  Chrebet,s been in a funk lately but in
their week he went off catching 8  passes for 140.? Sure some of it was
late, but garbage stats count too.?  Dedric Ward caught just 54 yards worth
of passes but he scored in  that game.? He,s come on lately  after fading
early. Rookie WR Laveranues Coles will miss another game it  appears. RB
Curtis Martin still is struggling to get 100% healthy  and that will hurt a
little.? TE  Anthony Becht is a bright spot as he,s beginning to contribute.?
December in New York will make a  difference to this soft Colt team which
doesn,t play as well in the  cold.?

Detroit Passing Game vs  Viking Defense?? Charlie Batch continued to  look
good and went a good ways toward erasing some of his (well deserved)
candybone label with a gutsy performance on Thanksgiving.? His ribs are
reportedly better and he  had a nice practice Tuesday throwing the ball.??
The Viking secondary could have  matchup troubles with WRs Johnnie Morton and
Herman Moore.? Over the last four weeks, Minnesota  ranks # 24 in passing
yards allowed  per game.? For the year, they rank # 22 in Fantasy  Points
allowed to opposing QBs.? The  Vikings are tough on TEs ranking # 7 in
Fantasy Points allowed to TEs for the  year but TE David Sloan has played
very well of late.? He ranks # 6 in Fantasy Points among TEs  over the last 3
games and is well worth a start here.

Denver Passing Game vs Saints Defense??  For all the hype generated by New
Orleans, defense, they give up tons of  yards passing.? Over the last four
weeks, they rank # 23 in passing yards allowed  per game.? They do sack the
QB a ton (19 over the  last four weeks) but they still give up the yards. It,
s kind of unusual to see  that. They,ll be facing Gus Frerotte and a Denver
team that,s trying to  find their way.? Frerotte,s been up  and down after
his monster week 12 game.?  The Saints continue to drop like flies and the
loss of CB Fred Weary will  definitely hurt.? Both WRs Rod  Smith and Ed
McCaffrey are solid plays as always.? And as crazy as it sounds, either one
of  the 2 headed TE monster in Dwayne Carswell and Desmond? Clark are decent
options too.? Byron Chamberlain  normally makes it a 3 headed TE monster but
he,s nursing a bad Achilles tendon  and didn,t play last week.? As noted
above, Denver gives up lots of yards through the air so this could be a high
scoring affair.? I doubt you could  have predicted a shootout between Aaron
Brooks and Gus Frerotte 4 months ago but  that,s why they play the games(

?

?

Even  Matchups:? These games feature no  real advantage either way?

Chicago Passing Game vs Packer  Defense??  I,m torn  here.? You probably saw
how weak the  Packer defense looked Monday night.?  They couldn,t do much of
anything.?  But on the other hand, the Bears will likely go with Shane
Matthews and  he,s been just awful lately.? Like  worse than Dave Brown kind
of bad.?  One would think he,d improve against this defense but he,ll have to
make  great strides just to get reach &average8. ?Owners of WR Marcus
Robinson feel it too as the big guy has pretty much disappeared lately  with
Matthews at the helm.? Still  though, there,s some hope.? On a  brighter
spot, Matthews does seem comfortable throwing to Eddie  Kennison who had 6
passes thrown to him Sunday compared to Robinson,s  4.? I,ve hear rumors that
Chicago  may start a TE but that news is unconfirmed at this time(? In the
"for  real" rumor department, QB Cade McNown is making noise about  wanting
to start this week but I think it's still a week  early.

New  England Passing Game vs Chief Defense?? Kansas City and New England are
two once proud teams that are struggling.?  This week a banged up Drew
Bledsoefaces a pass  defense that,s been vulnerable.?  Over the last four
weeks, Kansas City ranks # 20  in  passing yards allowed per game.? For the
year,? KC ranks # 24 in Fantasy Points allowed  to opposing QBs. Bledsoe
bruised a knee in Thursday,s game but played through it  and should be ok.?
Keep an eye on  him though as he was added to the injury report this week as
Questionable. As  long as Bledsoe plays, WR Terry  Glennshould be a good
option as he,s clearly the #1 guy in that offense over  Troy  Brown.? TE Rod
Rutledge  caught 4 passes  last week so he may start to make some noise.?
With all those productive years throwing  to Ben Coates, you know Bledsoe
would love to have a solid  TE.

Carolina Passing Game vs Rams  Defense?? Even if you want to pin Carolina,s
Monday Night performance on a weak Green Bay defense, credit still must be
given  to Steve  Beuerleinand the  Panthers.? The immobile Beuerlein  hung in
there and delivered.? He,s  facing a Rams defense that even with Bud Carson,s
help, still ranks # 19  in  passing yards allowed per game.? (Granted, that,s
a big improvement)? Beuerlein,s numbers may be helped by the  return of Ram
QB Kurt Warner as there,s nothing like the other team rolling up  points to
get your QB,s arm loose.?  WR  Muhsin Muhammad had the dominating  game we
all know he can and looked overpowering.? The hamstring injury was supposed
to be  with him all year but he looks good to me.?  Another boost for
Beuerlein will be if WR Donald  Hayescan get back on  the field as early
reports are hoping for.?  Even TE Kris  Mangum(be the one guy  in your league
that doesn,t say &mag-num8 like the gun) has been looking  good.? For the
year, St. Louis ranks  # 28 in Fantasy Points allowed to the TE so he could
be worth a shot.???

Jacksonville Passing Game vs Browns  Defense?? This one really is a case of
misdirection as QB Mark  Brunellisn,t as good as  many people think and the
Browns pass defense isn,t as bad as most people  assume.? Cleveland ranks #
18  in  passing yards allowed per game.? And for the year, they rank # 6 in
Fantasy Points allowed to opposing QBs which really surprises people.? The
reason is that their rush defense is  awful and teams choose to run instead.?
 But all you really care about are the stats.? Brunell should be ok but not
great here  as the Jaguars look to take out a season,s worth of frustrations
on the  Browns.?  Jimmy  Smithand  Keenan  McCardellare solid choices  as
usual.? Even the much maligned  (by me, anyway) rookie R. Jay  Sowardproduced
last  week.? Soward could actually be bad  news for McCardell and Smith as
there were times when Brunell really seemed to  force the ball his way.?  TE
Kyle Bradyis solid.? But honestly, I think this will be the  Fred Taylor on
the ground show against a weak rush  unit.?

Washington Passing Game vs Giant  Defense?? Brad  Johnsonmakes his return
this week taking over for Jeff George.?  It,s interesting to watch how the
Redskins spin this transition.? According to Washington, Johnson  starting
has nothing to do with Jeff George,s less than spectacular play or  record.?
&Johnson was the starter  all along regardless of how George played yada
yada(8? This type of talk makes it easier to  sell the fans Jeff George as
the starting QB next year.? We,ll see.? (for the record, I,m a George fan
and  have been for a while.? Myself and 8  other guys are pretty much it()??
Like most players in this &could go either way8 category, Johnson has  good
and bad points this week.? On  the upside, the Giants defense has shown
itself to be vulnerable to the  pass.? The Redskins also hope to  have RB
Stephen Davisthis week.? His presence does a great deal for the  passing
game.? On the downside,  Johnson will likely be rusty.? He  may still be
feeling some lingering effects of the injury.? Secondly, his best  WR,
Albert Connellmay play but he,s  nowhere near full speed.?  James
Thrashfilled in  admirably for Connell and looks to be a good play this week
as well.? It looks like  Irving  Fryarwill get the  start opposite Thrash.?
The ageless  wonder might do something if Jason Sehorn stays with Thrash as
Dave Thomas is by  far the weaker CB.?  TE  Stephen Alexanderis a steady
performer although FB Larry  Centerssteals too many  of the short passes that
could go to Alexander.?

New  York Giant Passing Game vs Redskin Defense? A good defense takes on a
good passing  offense.? I guess that,s why this  matchup is in this column.?
Over the  last four weeks Washington ranks # 15 in  passing yards allowed per
game.? For the year, they rank # 8 in Fantasy  Points allowed to opposing QBs
so they,re pretty tough.? QB Kerry  Collinshas quietly  played extremely well
over the last month.?  He,s thrown for 822 yards and 6 TDs over the last 3
games.? That puts him at # 6 in Fantasy Points  among QBs over that time
span.?  WR  Amani Toomercontinues to play  great football and is definitely
worth a shot.? Joe  Jureviciusfills in for the  injured Ike Hilliard again
and he,s a solid choice as Collins didn,t hesitate to  throw him the ball
often.?  TE? Pete Mitchell  is tough to depend  on as he gets more catches
but Dan  Campbellgrabs the TDs it  seems.? I,m not too excited about  either
guy.?

San  Diego Passing Game vs 49er Defense?? My Charger buddies have cautioned
me about jumping on the Ryan LeafBandwagon.? That was right after I,d sent a
group  email at halftime of the SD / KC game to some friends boasting about
&my8 QB  Leaf.? Of course, we know the  nd half didn,t go &quite8 as well as
the first and I came back to  reality.? But there,s some truth to  the idea
Leaf is becoming an NFL QB.?  I personally had doubts if we,d ever see it but
I think it,s starting to  happen.? And this week against a San  Francisco
defense, he could make some more strides.? It should be noted, the 49ers are
much  better on pass defense than they had been.?  Over the last four weeks,
they rank # 14 in passing yards allowed per  game which is a huge upgrade
from where they had been.? For the year though, they still rank #  30 in
Fantasy Points allowed to the opposing QB.? Leaf has some extremely solid
receivers.  TE  Freddie Jonesis his best  target but veteran WRs Jeff Graham
and Curtis  Conwayare more than  capable.? You,d think that San  Francisco
will score some points so there could be some fireworks.? I,d shy away from
Leaf but Jones in  particular could be a very nice play.???

San Francisco  Passing Game vs Charger Defense? The Charger defense held
Kansas City  down last week but I think that had more to do with Warren Moon,
s senior citizen  status than it did the Charger D.?  Granted they,re
improving, but I think San Francisco should be able to  move the ball.? Over
the last four  weeks, San Diego ranks # 13 in passing yards allowed per
game.? QB Jeff Garciais coming off a bye week and  should be rested and
prepared.? His  biggest problem will be the toe injury to WR Terrell Owens.?
Owens was unable to complete practice  Monday and it,s now looking like it
could be later this week before he sees the  practice field.? Coach Steve
Mariucci didn,t sound too optimistic.?  Although I can imagine worse
scenarios for a WR than having  Jerry  Riceas your best WR.? Owens will
definitely be missed but  J.J.  Stokesand  Tai  Streetswill fill in just
fine.? There had been some talk from Mariucci  about resting Garcia to see
how the rookie QBs Gio Carmazzi and Tim Rattay would  fare in game
situations.? I think  this is just talk at this point.? I  don,t really see
the Chargers blowing out San Francisco to the point Garcia  could be pulled.?
If Garcia gets San  Francisco such a lead that he could be pulled, he would
have probably earned a  great day of stats by then anyway.?  At least for
this week, I,m thinking he,ll be fine in the playing time  department.?

Minnesota Passing  Game vs Lion Defense? Ok, this is tough matchup for the
Vikings.? Detroit ranks # 6 in passing yards allowed per gameover the last
four  games.? But the Lions are dealing  with several injuries in their
secondary including Safety Ron Rice (leg )  probable) Kurt Schulz
(ankle-doubtful) and nickel back Marquis Walker  (wrist-out)? Still though,
you,re  crazy if you don,t start QB Daunte Culpepperand  WRs Randy  Mossand
Cris  Carter.? They,re just too  good.?

Kansas  City Passing Game vs Patriot Defense?? It,s early to make a call but
it,s  looking like QB Elvis  Grbacwill be back this  week.? That,s great news
for Chief  fans and Fantasy Owners.? The  Patriots rank # 10 in passing yards
allowed per game over the last four weeks  but those numbers are a little
skewed as Detroit, Cincinnati, Cleveland and  Buffalo were the opponents.?
It,s  not like they shut down the Rams or 49ers.?  Grbac will look to get his
# 1 target TE Tony  Gonzalezback on track  after he was shut out by the
Chargers.?  I don,t think you,ll see that again with Grbac under center.? WR
Derrick  Alexanderis an excellent  target too.? Rookie  Sylvester
Morrisseems to be  fading instead of getting better.?  He may be hitting the
infamous &rookie wall8.?

?

Downside Matchups:? These games favor the  Defense?

Dallas  Passing Game vs Buccaneer Defense?? Emmitt Smith seems recovered
from  his &knockout slap8 Thursday and says he,ll start.? That,s good news
for all aspects of the  Dallas offense.?  QB  Troy Aikmansquares off  against
a Tampa defense that's bark is worse than its bite.? Over the last four
weeks, they rank # 21  in  passing yards allowed per game.? Although they
have registered 12 sacks  over that span which is towards the top of the
league.? They,re solid though.? WRs Wayne  McGarityand  James  McKnightare
showing  they,re not anything exceptional.?  TE  Jackie Harriswas injured
last  week and David  LaFluerwoke up with a  great game.???

Cleveland Passing Game vs Jaguar  Defense?? One has to ask if anyone really
cares whether QBsDoug  Pedersonor  Spergon  Wynngets the majority  of the
snaps.? I think I can say  fairly confidently that neither of these guys have
been figuring heavily into  your plans.? The Jaguar defense has  improved
significantly of late. ?They rank # 17  in  passing yards allowed per
gameover the last  four weeks and they should be plenty good enough to
contain the Browns.? This team never really had a chance once  Tim Couch and
Errict Rhett went down.?  Kevin  Johnsonand  David  Patten handle the WR
duties but I can,t advocate either with a clear conscience.  TE  AaronShea
will start for  the Browns but probably not for your FF Team.?

Green  Bay Passing Game vs Bear Defense?? It,s hard to know what to think
about Green Bay. One game they look like the Packers of old with Favre
working  his magic and the next, they look like a shell of their former
selves as they  did on Monday Night against a Carolina team that had no
business handling them  as they did.?  Brett  Favreis still a decent  bet to
sling a few TDs on any Sunday but he,s sadly become just an average  Fantasy
QB.? Lately, the Bears have  been tough against the pass ranking # 12 in
passing yards allowed per game over  the last four weeks.? Although for  the
year, they rank # 29 in Fantasy Points allowed to the opposing QB.? Favre
will have the very disappointing  Antonio  Freemanto throw to  although Bill
Schroederis putting up  better numbers the last few weeks.?  He has another
advantage in that while Freeman will likely draw CB Thomas  Smith, Schroeder
likely goes against Jerry Azumah.? Remember Schroeder came up huge in the
week 5 matchup with 2 TDs in the 4th quarter.? For a TE, I,d go with  Bubba
Franksalthough whenever  I say that it seems Tyrone  Daviscatches a  TD(?

Seattle Passing Game vs Falcon  Defense?? This is an interesting game as two
proud coaches in Dan Reeves and Mike Holmgren lead teams that are
floundering.? The one bright spot  for the Falcons is that they,ve yielded
few yards passing although the &glass is  half empty8 crowd will point out
that the reason for that is the weak rush  defense.? Why throw the ball when
you can run on Atlanta?? Regardless  of the reason, teams don,t throw much
against the Falcons and I don,t look for  QB Jon Kitnato  completely break
that trend.? He,ll  be looking to quiet producers Sean Dawkinsand Derrick
Mayes.?  Dawkins in particular has been exceptional over the last few weeks
and is  probably worth a start.????

Indianapolis Passing  Game vs Jets Defense?? I love  Peyton  Manningbut he,s
a guy that doesn,t  always post the Fantasy Football numbers to match his
hype.? He,s a solid producer who,ll very rarely  burn you but he,s also not
too subject to the 400 yard / 4 TD day.? With that said, I think you,ll see
another good, solid day from him against a Jet defense that,s tough.? Over
the last four weeks, New York ranks  # 11 in passing yards allowed per game.?
 For the year, they rank # 7 in Fantasy Points allowed to the opposing  QB.?
Manning will try to jump start  his team that,s floundering a bit.?  They
know they need a win and a team like this can be tough when  &cornered8.? I,m
not heeding the  grumblings about WR  Marvin Harrison. He,s fine.? He caught
2 TDs last week and has stated  he needs to &get on a mission8 although he
needs some help.? Jerome Pathonhad some horrendous drops.? E.G. Greenhopes to
be back this week from  a knee injury and that will be good news.?  Terrence
Wilkins and Pathon just aren,t getting it done.? TEs Marcus Pollardand  Ken
Dilgerboth catch just enough to make  neither guy very valuable.

Oakland Passing Game  vs Steeler Defense?? QB Rich Gannonis garnering lots of
talk about  the league MVP.? Could be.? But  he,s got a tough matchup this
week against a Steeler team playing with  confidence.? Pittsburgh ranks # 8
in  passing yards allowed per game over the last four weeks.? For the season,
they rank # 2 in Fantasy  Points allowed to the opposing QB so that,s
strong.? WRTim Brownis the clear cut target of  choice and that makes things
great for Brown owners.? You know he,ll get his touches.? Andre Risonand
James  Jettwill get the scraps left  over.? TE Ricky Dudleyis a guy who you
play totally  at your own risk.? He,s just as  liable to go catchless as he
is score 2 TDs.???

?

Defensive Slam Dunks:? These games heavily favor the  Defense

Miami  Passing Game vs Bills Defense?  Let,s  see(Jay  Fiedlercoming back
from  a shoulder injury, in what will likely be horrible weather conditions,
against  the # 2 ranked defense in passing yards allowed per game over the
last four  weeks.? That,s what you,ve got in  this game and it,s enough to
have me looking elsewhere if I,ve got Dolphin  passing game players.? I,d
start who  ever you did last week if Fiedler is your QB.? If you have to
start a Miami WR, I,d  roll the dice on the unheralded Leslie  Shepherdwho,s
catching  more than anyone thought he would.?  Slim pickings with this
matchup after that.?

Buffalo Passing Game vs Dolphin  Defense?? Let,s  see(Rob  Johnsoncoming back
from  his latest injury, in what will likely be horrible weather conditions,
against  the # 3 ranked defense in passing yards allowed per game over the
last four  weeks.? This sounds familiar(? Seriously, this game ought to be a
defensive struggle as two dominant defenses square off in the snow against
mediocre offenses.? Rob Johnson will  get the start but as usual, won,t
finish the game.? Eric  Mouldswill gather the  majority of catches and is
probably too good not to start just because he,s so  talented and he does
grab the lions share of passes thrown.? TE Jay  Reimersmais fast regaining
his place as one of the best TEs in the game and depending on the weather
here,  he could be the best receiving choice.???

Philadelphia Passing Game vs Titan  Defense?? Understand that this is a bad
matchup for Donovan McNabband the Eagles but so was last week against
Washington.? And all McNabb did was  win Offensive Player of the Week
honors.?  Outside of McNabb and TE Chad Lewis, I can,t recommend any other
players as  starters.? Neither  WRsCharles  Johnsonor Torrance  Smallscare
anyone.? The Titans are an athletic and physical  unit that you,d think would
give McNabb trouble. And truthfully, the Washington  game would have likely
been different if "spy" LaVarr Arrington hadn't been hurt  early.? The lack
of a passing game threat really hurts as Tennessee will  likely be able to
handle the WRs with man coverage and commit more personnel to  the run and
McNabb.? Still, if he,s  by far your best QB, I,d roll the dice with him as
he,s made a season out of  proving people wrong.

Tennessee Passing Game vs Eagle  Defense?? Steve  McNairranks # 23 among QBs
over the last 3 games in Fantasy Points per game.? That,s not real solid.? I
don,t see him suddenly improving his  play against an Eagle defense that
ranks # 5 in passing yards allowed per  game.? And for the year, they rank #
3 in Fantasy Points allowed to the opposing QB.?? The Eagles have 15 sacks
over the  last 4 games and while McNair is tough guy to sack, it,s obvious
the Eagles will  pressure him.? His WR corps in  Derrick Masonand  Chris
Sandersaren,t  the greatest.? As usual, his best  option will be TE Frank
Wycheck.?  Wycheck struggled last week with some uncharacteristic drops, but
this  week he could be an asset as McNair likely won,t have a lot of time to
throw.?

Tampa Bay Passing Game vs Cowboy  Defense?? Who knows where the  Shaun
KingRoller Coaster  Ride will take us this week?? He,s  nursing a back strain
but practiced Wednesday and looks good to go.? The Cowboys surprisingly have
played  decent pass defense ranking # 9 in passing yards allowed per game.?
Of course, that,s largely because no  team feels the need to throw the ball
when they can run at will.? King will spread the ball between  WRs  Keyshawn
Johnsonand  Jacquez  Green.? I,m not especially excited about either  but it,
s very hard to turn your back on Keyshawn.? TE Dave  Mooreis a fine  producer
and I,d feel comfortable starting him.?

?

?

 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
cheatsheets-unsubscribe@egroups.com


Greetings from Amazon.com.

We thought you'd like to know that we shipped your gift today,
and that this completes your order.

Thanks for shopping at Amazon.com, and we hope to see you again soon.

The following items were included in this shipment:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Qty      Item                           Price  Shipped  Subtotal
---------------------------------------------------------------------
1        Feud : Hatfields, McCoys, and  $17.95  1       $17.95

---------------------------------------------------------------------
               Item Subtotal:  $17.95
         Shipping & Handling:  $8.98
                    Giftwrap:  $4.99
                       Total:  $31.92
--------------------------------------------------------------------

This shipment was sent to:

 John H. Taylor
 6530 Teakwood Ct.
 Cincinnati OH 45224

via UPS Second Day (2 business days).

For your reference, the number you can use to track your package is
1Z410E7W0225312862.  You can refer to our web site's Help page or:

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/subst/tracking.html

to retrieve current tracking information.  Please note that tracking
information may not be available immediately.

You can view or manage your orders online by visiting Your Account at
http://www.amazon.com/your-account. You can also reach Your Account by
clicking the link in the top right corner of any page on our Web site.

If you still need to get in touch with us about your order, send
an e-mail message to orders@amazon.com, or contact us via FAX
(1-206-266-2950) or phone (1-800-201-7575 for US customers or
1-206-266-2992 for international customers).

On your next visit to our Web site, come see what's New for You
by clicking the link on the right-hand side of our home page, or
by visiting this URL:

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/subst/recs/new-for-you/new-for-you.html/ref=
cs_ae_nfy

We've selected an assortment of new releases, recommendations, and
informative articles that we think would appeal to you.

Thank you for shopping at Amazon.com.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Amazon.com
Earth's Biggest Selection
orders@amazon.com             http://www.amazon.com/

It's summertime--and the shopping is easy.
Come sift through our fun-filled Summer Sampler:
http://www.amazon.com/summer2000
---------------------------------------------------------------------


<<ENRON MIRANT SOCO ISDA AMENDMENT LTR MIR LCMTS.DOC>>

Sara,

I have a couple quick comments on the letter you sent this morning.  In
general, we need to make clear that we are replacing the credit support
provider under the ISDA.  Otherwise, I am concerned that we could face a
possible default under the ISDA once the VRI parental guaranty is
terminated. Otherwise, the letter looks very agreeable to me.  I am
anticipating we can get this executed today so please keep in touch with me
in regards to any further changes you would like to make.

Many thanks for all your help.

Best regards,

Nicole Russell

 - ENRON MIRANT SOCO ISDA AMENDMENT LTR MIR LCMTS.DOC


Jim:

I have not seen any Enron Corp./CSFB agreements.

ENA has two different agreements with CSFB:

(1)  ISDA dated4/21/93.  This had:  NY law, submission to non-exclusive
jurisdiction of NY courts/waiver of objections to venue, limitation of
liability

(2)  Futures Agreement dated 9/21/00.  This had:  NY law, arbitration,
limitation of liability


And there's more!

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 01/09/2001 03:21 PM -----

	"Serge Martin" <Sgm@steelhector.com>
	01/09/2001 03:15 PM

		 To: Sara.Shackleton@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: FPL Energy Power Marketing Inc./Enron North America Corp.

Sara: As promised, enclosed is a red-line of the FPL Energy Power
Marketing Inc./Enron North America Corp. drafts vs. the final executed
Florida Power & Light Co./Enron North America Corp. agreements.
Regards, -Serge

Serge G. Martin
smartin@steelhector.com
Steel Hector & Davis LLP
200 South Biscayne Blvd.
Miami, Florida 33131-2398
(305) 577-7097 phone
(305) 577-7001 fax

 - 641009_1.DOC


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Dannhaus, Ed
Sent:	Monday, July 30, 2001 7:05 AM
To:	Allen, Phillip K.
Subject:	Re:

She is fine and acts like she belongs there are plenty of new things for her to investigate.


Jeff,

Rick asked that I forward this to you.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Carolyn Cooney
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 2:44 PM
To: Ginger Dernehl
Cc: Lora Sullivan
Subject: Latest version of the presentation
Importance: High

Ginger,

Here is the latest version of the presentation.  Rick made some changes this
morning.

Thanks!

Carolyn


I guess I will have to be content with "Gator on a stick" Louisiana style !!

Brian Hoskins@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
11/13/2000 04:16 PM
To: Lenine Jeganathan/HOU/ECT@ECT@ENRON
cc: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT@ENRON, Hector Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT@ENRON, Shanna
Husser/HOU/EES@EES@ECT@ENRON

Subject: Re: Thanksgiving dinner

Please, no fruit bats this year, Lenny!

	Lenine Jeganathan@ECT
	11/13/00 04:17 PM

		 To: Shanna Husser/HOU/EES@EES
		 cc: Hector Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian Hoskins/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications
		 Subject: Re: Thanksgiving dinner

I'll get the wine.Unless you all want to experiment with my cooking skills.

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Shanna Husser @ EES                           11/13/2000 04:08 PM

To: Hector Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian Hoskins/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Lenine Jeganathan/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Thanksgiving dinner

I didn't realize that there was a "tradition".  Remember- I wasn't in y'alls
little picture around this time last year.  What does the tradition consist
of?

   Hector Campos @ ECT                11/13/2000 03:57 PM

To: Brian Hoskins/Enron Communications@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS@ENRON
cc: Shanna Husser/HOU/EES@EES, Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lenine
Jeganathan/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Thanksgiving dinner

I can cook.

Brian Hoskins@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
11/13/2000 02:41 PM
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shanna Husser/HOU/EES@EES, Hector
Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lenine Jeganathan/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Thanksgiving dinner

Do you guys want to keep the tradition and organize a Thanksgiving dinner
this Sunday?

Brian T. Hoskins
Enron Broadband Services
713-853-0380 (office)
713-412-3667 (mobile)
713-646-5745 (fax)
Brian_Hoskins@enron.net


RRG folks:

Sorry for this, but I attached the wrong spreadsheet to the prior e-mail (below).  Please substitute the following attached spreadsheet, and I apologize for the inconvenience.

Shelly Richardson, Attorney at Law
P.O. Box 61845
Vancouver, Washington  98666-1845
U.S.A.
voice (360) 737-2464
fax (360) 737-2661
shellyr@pacifier.com <mailto:shellyr@pacifier.com>

----- Original Message -----
From: Shelly Richardson <mailto:shellyr@pacifier.com>
To: RRGA-L@LIST.RTOWEST.ORG <mailto:RRGA-L@LIST.RTOWEST.ORG>
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 6:02 PM
Subject: Joint PNGC/NRU Comments on White Papers

----- Original Message -----
From: Shelly Richardson <mailto:shellyr@pacifier.com>
To: Bud Krogh <mailto:ekrogh@serv.net> ; Christine Elliott <mailto:chrisrtowest@earthlink.net>
Cc: John D. Saven <mailto:jsaven@pacifier.com> ; Darrel VanCoevering <mailto:dgv@xprt.net> ; Aleka Scott <mailto:Aleka_Scott@pngc.com> ; Geoff Carr <mailto:ghcarr@pacifier.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 5:52 PM
Subject: Joint PNGC/NRU Comments on White Papers

Bud and Chris:

Attached please find the joint comments (and related spreadsheet) prepared by PNGC and NRU regarding the December 14, 2001 RTOW "White Papers".  Please give us a call if you have questions, and when you want to discuss same.

Thanks and best regards for the new year!

Shelly Richardson, Attorney at Law
P.O. Box 61845
Vancouver, Washington  98666-1845
U.S.A.
voice (360) 737-2464
fax (360) 737-2661
shellyr@pacifier.com <mailto:shellyr@pacifier.com>


What about the questions I asked about whether the new entity would comply
with Order No. 2000 (especially if the state has the vertically integrated
utilities operate the system)?  See attached word version of my orginal
E-mail.

02/21/2001 11:03 AM
Bernadette Hawkins@ENRON
Bernadette Hawkins@ENRON
Bernadette Hawkins@ENRON
02/21/2001 11:03 AM
02/21/2001 11:03 AM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda
Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron,
Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Scope of FERC Jurisdiction Over State-Owned Utility

Attached is a memo that addreses the FERC's jurisdiction over the
transfer/sales of utility assets to the state of California.  At a minimum,
FERC must approve the transfer.  Call if you have questions.  Joe
----- Forwarded by Bernadette Hawkins/Corp/Enron on 02/21/2001 01:55 PM -----

	"Tracey Bradley" <tbradley@bracepatt.com>
	02/21/2001 01:10 PM

		 To: <jhartso@enron.com>
		 cc: <jdwatkiss@aol.com>, "Andrea Settanni" <asettanni@bracepatt.com>,
"Ronald Carroll" <rcarroll@bracepatt.com>
		 Subject: Scope of FERC Jurisdiction Over State-Owned Utility

Please see attached memorandum.  We have also attached FERC's orders
addressing LIPA's acquisition of LILCO's transmission assets and LIPA's open
access tariff.  Please call if you have any questions.

 - 0138443.01
 - EC97-45.TXT
 - NJ98-4.TXT


Ashley and I need your address again and your uncles' addresses for Christmas
cards.

How is married life treating you?  Good I hope.  What are you guys doing for
Christmas?  Are your folks coming in?

We are staying in Houston.  Should be nice and quiet.  We are going to have a
few people over for new year's, but nothing special.
PL


SK - I printed this out.  mm

Maureen in case he did not received before.

Maureen McVicker@ENRON

12/22/2000 03:47 PM

To: Bill Donovan/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christie Patrick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cynthia
Sandherr/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Elizabeth Labanowski/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jackie
Gentle/LON/ECT@ECT, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Jane
Wilson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Joe Allen/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joe Hillings/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John
Ambler/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John
Hardy/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jose
Bestard/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Lindolfo Ernesto
Paixao/SA/Enron@Enron, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark
Schroeder/LON/ECT@ECT, Michael Terraso/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Mike
Dahlke/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mike G Smith/NA/Enron@Enron,
Nicholas O'Day/AP/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Peter
Styles/LON/ECT@ECT, Tom Briggs/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Cindy Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: 2000 ACCOMPLISHMENTS

Steve Kean would like each of you to send him a list of your accomplishments
for 2000.

If you have already provided the list to Steve, please disregard this email.

DUE DATE:  Close of business, Thurs., Jan. 4


can we make it 10:30?

"Larry W. Bass" <lwbthemarine@bigplanet.com> on 09/04/2000 02:23:34 PM
To: jason <jason.bass2@compaq.com>, eric preston bass <Eric.Bass@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Bonnie

Howdy. Bonnie will be here Thursday, for a week. If  you guys are available,
we thought we would take all to Brunch @ SWCC, 11 a.m.  Sunday. Girls are
invited. Let me know if you can make it and if your better  halves will
accompany you. Do so, please, by Wed., so I can make the  reservations.-Dad


For your information, the spreadsheets attached below list the candidates
from the June 3rd Super Saturday who have been made offers.  All of the
candidates have been contacted.

Thanks again for your participation.


Hello, Bill!   Stan will attend in person.

Cindy

Billy Dorsey@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
05/02/2001 12:03 PM
To: Cliff Baxter/HOU/ECT, Jeremy Blachman/HOU/EES@EES, Philippe A
Bibi/HOU/ECT, Raymond Bowen/HOU/ECT, Michael R Brown@ECT, Rick Buy/HOU/ECT,
Richard Causey@ENRON, Wade Cline/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, David
Cox@Enron Communications, David W Delainey/HOU/EES@EES, James
Derrick/Corp/Enron, Steve Elliott@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS, Jim Fallon/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Andrew S Fastow/HOU/ECT, Mark
Frevert/NA/Enron, Ben Glisan@ECT, Kevin Hannon@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS, Rod
Hayslett/FGT/Enron, Stanley Horton@ENRON, James A Hughes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Louise Kitchen@ECT, Mark Koenig@ENRON, Kenneth
Lay@ENRON, John J Lavorato/Enron@EnronXGate, Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Danny
McCarty@Enron, Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rebecca
McDonald/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jeffrey McMahon/HOU/ECT, Mark Metts/NA/Enron,
Mark S Muller/HOU/EES@EES, Cindy Olson@ENRON, Karen S Owens@ees@EES, Ken
Rice@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS, Matthew Scrimshaw@ECT, Jeffrey A
Shankman/Enron@EnronXGate, Jeffrey Sherrick/Corp/Enron, John Sherriff@ECT,
Jeff Skilling@ENRON, Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, Greg Whalley@ECT, Thomas E
White/HOU/EES@EES, Greg Piper/Corp/Enron, Janet R Dietrich/HOU/EES@EES
cc: G G Garcia/NA/Enron, Susan Skarness/HOU/ECT, Karen K Heathman/HOU/ECT,
Sharron Westbrook@ENRON, Kay Chapman/HOU/EES@EES, Stephanie
Harris/Corp/Enron, Bridget Maronge/HOU/ECT, Nicki Daw/NA/Enron, Inez C
Dauterive@ECT, Carol Ann Brown@ECT, Cindy Stark@ENRON, Maureen
McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron, Joannie Williamson@ENRON, Rosalee Fleming@ENRON,
Tori L Wells@ECT, Cathy Phillips@ECT, Loretta Brelsford/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Sue Ford/HOU/ECT, Dolores Fisher/NA/Enron, Karen Owens/HOU/EES@EES, Dorothy
Dalton@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS, Mercedes E Estrada@Enron Communications,
Christina Grow/Corp/Enron, Lauren Urquhart@ECT, Sherri Sera/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Liz M Taylor@ECT, Judy G Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Kathy McMahon/NA/Enron@Enron,
Suzanne Danz@ENRON, Peggy McCurley/HOU/ECT, Marsha Schiller/HOU/ECT, Samantha
Lopez-Dias/EU/Enron@Enron, Jana L Paxton/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Connie Blackwood/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Tammie Schoppe@ECT, Kimberly
Hillis/HOU/ECT, Jennifer Burns/HOU/ECT, Sharon Dick/HOU/EES@EES, Kathy
Dodgen/HOU/EES@EES, Kerry Ferrari@ECT, Carol Moffett/HOU/EES@EES, Jennifer T
Adams/HOU/EES@EES, Leah Rijo@ECT, Lucy Marshall/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Kathy Campos/GPGFIN/Enron, Julie Armstrong@Enron, Binky
Davidson/HOU/EES@EES, Mrudula Gadade/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Kelly Johnson@Enron, Rebecca Carter@ENRON, Tina Spiller/Corp/Enron, Vivianna
Bolen/Corp/Enron, Linda Hawkins/Corp/Enron, Vanessa Bob/Corp/Enron, Esmeralda
Hinojosa/HOU/EES@EES

Subject: re: Executive Committee Meeting

Executive Committee Weekly Meeting
Date:  Monday, May 7th
Time:  11:00 a.m. (CDT)
Location: 50th Floor Boardroom
Video:  Connections will be established with remote locations upon request.
Conf call: AT&T lines have been reserved.  Please contact Sherri Sera
(713/853-5984)
  or Bill Dorsey (713/646-6505) for the weekly dial-in number and passcode.

Please indicate below whether or not you plan to attend this meeting and
through what medium.

 Yes, I will attend in person _______

 By video conference from _______

 By conference call  _______

 No, I will not attend  _______

*  *  *

Please return this e-mail to me with your response by 12:00 p.m., Friday, May
4th

Thank you,
Bill Dorsey.


Please see below.

gngr
---------------------- Forwarded by Ginger Dernehl/HOU/EES on 04/27/2000
09:36 AM ---------------------------

Richard Shapiro
04/26/2000 11:35 PM
To: Ginger Dernehl/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Introduction to Downstream Origination

Please distribute to everyone in group in North America. Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES on 04/26/2000
11:34 PM ---------------------------

Wendy King@ENRON
04/26/2000 03:07 PM
To: Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES
cc: James A Ajello/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim Crump/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Glenn
Wright/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Andrew Wilson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Greg
Hermans/Corp/Enron@Enron, Tammy L Mulrooney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cuthbert
Roberts/Corp/Enron@Enron, Edward Ondarza/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Introduction to Downstream Origination

Richard,

Per our conversation please find attached a brief introduction to Downstream
Originations, the crux of our efforts, and a contact list.
We continue to benefit from increased contact with your staff, and look
forward to working together on more projects.

Kindly amend if necessary and distribute to all concerned.  I have confirmed
to Ginger that I am available to make a presentation at your June 8/9 meeting
as well.

Regards,

Wendy King
X35814


Hello Team,

There has been some revisions to the Reception and Interview dates.  Please
look at the event form for the details.

I have attached the strategy also for your convenience.

Geynille


Hi Charlotte,

We are starting to check out our options for the summer, and one of the
things we are considering is the day camp that Enron is involved with.  They
pick up and deliver from the Enron building, and I was wondering if you might
consider picking Michael up from here (Enron).  I suspect most days he could
go to your place.

I have no idea if this is the direction we will go, but I thought I would run
it by you early on.  I have to think about how much travel I might have, as
it might be hard on Neil to take Michael downtown in the morning.  Paige has
applied for a job at Enron, though, so if that worked out we would be in good
shape.

Here's a link.   They have some neat themes.

http://www.kidventurecamp.com/camp_enron.htm

Have you heard of any other good day camps?  You seem to be plugged in fairly
well.

Thanks,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 01/25/2001 10:05
AM ---------------------------

	From:  WorkLife Department and Kidventure
01/24/2001 11:00 PM

Sent by: Enron Announcements
To: All Enron Houston
cc:

Subject: Kidventure Camp


i can't get down there by the end of the year.  so you are finally going to
get a job?  that is good.  why cant your state get all their votes in?  if
they don't vote for bush i am going to be so pissed.  sounds like max and jen
bought a big house.  we might need to make a bet on the lsu-flor game in the
sec championship.


First,  I thought the inservice was to be earlier than 3rd quarter??  confused
Second, on term I'd suggest we say a minimum of five years, so if someone
wants to bid for a longer term they can--
Third, in the 3rd paragraph change the reference to term, to as specifed
above-
Fourth, in the last paragraph, add minimum term of five years again.

MK

Steven Harris
12/04/2000 08:07 AM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Lindy Donoho/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lorraine
Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Draft Open Season Posting

Yes, I thought was to not take back space in the EOT area since we have some
available and were not looking to expand there.

Drew Fossum
12/04/2000 07:57 AM
To: Lindy Donoho/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON,
Lorraine Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Draft Open Season Posting

Looks OK to me, subject to approval from MKM's group.  Should we also solicit
turnback in the East of Thoreau area in addition to soliciting it from Cal.
border to Thoreau?  Is it our theory that since Thor.-Cal is the constrained
segment, thats the only area we need to solicit turnback on?  DF

Lindy Donoho
12/01/2000 02:22 PM
To: Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew
Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lorraine Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Draft Open Season Posting

Attached is a draft posting for the 10,000/d mainline expansion.  Please let
me know your comments by the end of the day Monday, December 4th.

Thanks!


I spoke with Donna Bobbish this morning about Steve's question -- does the
President have broader authority to take action during times of crisis.
Donna sent me this quick write up about what she has looked into so far.
Because these questions go beyond a FERC practitioner's expertise, we asked
Donna to work with a Constitutional Law expert at V&E to determine whether,
and under what circumstances, the President's authority may be extended
beyond the authorities discussed in the memo.

We will let you know what we learn from that further research.

Sarah

----- Forwarded by Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron on 05/23/2001 03:48 PM -----

	"Bobbish, Donna J." <dbobbish@velaw.com>
	05/23/2001 12:16 PM

		 To: "'snovose@enron.com'" <snovose@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Presidential Power Question

Sarah:  In response to Steve's inquiry, I did look into this question
briefly when you first gave me the assignment.  I read an interesting law
review article  on "The Imposition of Martial Law in the United States," for
a discussion of presidential powers.  There is no general emergency
authority granted the President in the U.S.  Constitution.  Also, the
article discussed the famous "Truman steel mills case," Youngstown Sheet &
Tube Co. v. Sawyer, 343 U.S. 579 (1952), in which the Supreme Court declared
unconstitutional President Truman's seizure of the steel mills during the
Korean War.  In that case, in light of a threatened national-wide strike in
the national steel industry, President Truman, concerned about the national
defense, issued an Executive Order directing the Secretary of Commerce to
take possession of most of the steel mills and keep them running.  The
Supreme Court said that if the President had authority to take such  an
action, he had to derive it either from an act of Congress or the
Constitution itself.  Since the Supreme Court could not find any seizure
authority, it invalidated the President's action.  The Supreme Court also
rejected the argument that the President had any powers that could be
implied from the aggregate of his powers under the Constitution.

Based on the Truman steel mills case, I thought it the wiser course of
action to look for specific authorities given to the President by statute
which might prove useful.

I could look into this question further, if you would like, but we would be
entering "martial law-type" legal territory, where the President would be
acting outside of specific Constitutional or congressional authority (which
has been described a "zone of twilight"), and in light of the Truman steel
mills case, I don't know how fruitful that might be.

Please let me know if you would like me to do anything more.  Thank you.
Donna
          ++++++CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE+++++
The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged.  This
email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization
named above.  If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized
representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any,
or the information contained herein is prohibited.  If you have received
this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email
and delete this email from your system.  Thank You


---------------------- Forwarded by Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT on 01/06/2000
10:27 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Maria Sandoval                           01/04/2000 10:07 AM

To: Margo Reyna/HOU/EES@EES, Andrea R Guillen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phenicia
Olivier/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa
Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pamela Sonnier/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cassandra S
Dutton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cecilia Olvera/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lorraine Becker/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Irena D Hogan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Angela Henn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melba Lozano/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Chantelle Villanueva/HOU/ECT@ECT, yolanda.sandoval@mwk.com,
patty.soria@mwk.com, mcastillo@metromkt.com, elizabeth.gutierrez@eott.com,
Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth Soto/HOU/ECT@ECT, amolina@unifirst.com,
apena26@hotmail.com
cc:
Subject: I ASKED GOD TO BLESS YOU TODAY!!

---------------------- Forwarded by Maria Sandoval/HOU/ECT on 01/04/2000
10:06 AM ---------------------------

Chantelle Villanueva
01/04/2000 09:59 AM
To: Kim Perez/FGT/Enron@ENRON, cassandra.hernandez@halliburton.com, Irena D
Hogan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth Soto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Maria Sandoval/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: I ASKED GOD TO BLESS YOU TODAY!!

---------------------- Forwarded by Chantelle Villanueva/HOU/ECT on
01/04/2000 09:59 AM ---------------------------
From: Kim Perez@ENRON on 01/04/2000 09:11 AM
To: nrodrigu@stewart.com, aadame@dianal.com, lcarden@sterlingchemicals.com,
delossantosmd@c-b.com, megonzales@duke-energy.com,
cassandra.hernandez@halliburton.com, mik61@aol.com,
frank.rodriguez@solvay.com, Chantelle Villanueva/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary
Dreadin/GCO/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: I ASKED GOD TO BLESS YOU TODAY!!

HAPPY NEW YEAR 2000!   IT'S GOING TO BE A WONDERFUL YEAR!

>
> I asked the Lord to bless you
> As I prayed for you today
> To guide you and protect you
> As you go along your way....
> His love is always with you
> His promises are true,
> And when we give Him all our cares
> You know He will see us through
> So when the road you're traveling on
> Seems difficult at best
> Just remember I'm here praying
> And God will do the rest.
>
> Pass this to people you want God to bless, and don't forget to
> send it back to the one who ask God to bless you first.
>


As you may be aware, Enron Corp. is a member of the Official Unsecured
Creditors' Committee appointed in the Pacific Gas and Electric Company
bankruptcy case. Michael Tribolet with the Risk Assessment and Control Group
is Enron's designated representative on the committee and he is being
assisted by Lisa Mellencamp in the Enron North America Corp. legal group.
Please be advised that they will be restricted from disclosing certain of the
information that they receive.

Attached are Ethical Wall Procedures regarding confidential information that
Enron may receive as a member of the committee. It is important that you read
the procedures promptly, print the Employee Certification attached and sign
and return the Employee Certification to the Compliance Department as
directed.


Due to the problems we always seem to have regarding non-EOL transacted gas deals, the following procedure should be followed from today forward:

Please send, via e-mail, the terms of gas deals that are transacted with another power trader or transacted with a gas trader over the phone.  We will then ensure that it gets captured in the gas valuation system.

Please forward this to your direct reports.

Thanks,
Stacey


We should see if we could set up the loop this weekend going from 4C to NP15.
Here is a new possibility for a loop that is available most days. I tried to
set it up Friday but came back and said there was no room after telling me
all day there was room on the line.  Here is the recipe:

Pac Trannie from 4c to Gonder.
SPP Trannie from Gonder to Summit. (SPP's trannie desk is 775-834-3909).
ISO import at summit.

There is supposedly 25-30 MW room on the Gonder-Summit line. The price is
$6.90.
I think this can be a great alternative for the loop through IPC or MPC. I
was not able to schedule any of those two lines today because everything
going north is full.

Geir


Attached is PIRA's extended Daily Demand Report.

Please contact Morris Greenberg and Victoria Watkins for more information
regarding these reports at [mailto:morris@pira.com] and
[mailto:vwatkins@pira.com], respectively. For distribution requests, contact
John Graziano at [mailto:jgraziano@pira.com]. We can all be reached at (212)
686-6808.

 - ed042401.pdf
 - ed042401.xls


===================================================

Recommend emails are a powerful way to get investment tips as they happen
from the ClearStation community. If you would like to UNSUBSCRIBE, go to
http://clearstation.etrade.com/doc/unsub_kensey.html

*NOTE : DO NOT reply to this email. Replies should be made within 'Discuss'
at the url given below.
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-
'kensey' has recommended BSYS (Short) at Jan 12 2002  1:08PM

Bisys Group ( NASDAQ : BSYS )
Computer - Services : 0 new highs in group of 59

Symbol       Last     Time     Change     High      Low     Volume
-----        ----     ----      -----     ----      ---      -----
BSYS        63.62   6:37PM      -1.38    65.50    63.59    551,500

Community Take
--------------
17 Long / 1 Short

'kensey' said:
Sat Jan 12 09:51:41 2002

BSYS as a short candidate.

starting to waffle & drift.  check it - the flatness and churn over the past few weeks at the current level.  up followed by churn/flat/apathy/pathos/butt usually leads to a price break down.

but we'll see.

as with the GDW trade, position short here.  BUT in regarding the resistance level be ready to go long on a break in that direction.  often a position short bleeds into a position long.  which can be the value of a blown short apparent.  the level to watch is 66.  setting itself up as major resistance.  short sales should be only entered near or at that level.

the pivot has been established.  it is at 66.

kensey
See the annotated graph of this recommendation at:

http://clearstation.etrade.com/cgi-bin/bbs?Cmd=post&post_id=2828222
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-
Recommend emails are a powerful way to get investment tips as they happen
from the ClearStation community. If you would like to UNSUBSCRIBE, go to
http://clearstation.etrade.com/doc/unsub_kensey.html

ClearStation is not an investment advisory service,
nor a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer and
does not purport to tell or suggest which securities
members should buy or sell for themselves. Members should
always check with their licensed financial advisor
and their tax advisor to determine the suitability of
any investment.
ClearStation, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of
E*TRADE Group, Inc. and an affiliate of E*TRADE
Securities, Inc. and E*TRADE Bank. E*TRADE Securities,
Inc. and E*TRADE Bank are wholly-owned subsidiaries of
E*TRADE Group, Inc. E*TRADE Bank deposits are insured up
to $100,000 by the FDIC. E*TRADE Bank and E*TRADE
Securities, Inc. are separate but affiliated companies.
E*TRADE brokerage accounts are maintained by E*TRADE
Securities, Inc. Products offered by E*TRADE Securities,
Inc. are not insured by the FDIC, are not deposits or
obligations of E*TRADE Bank, are subject to investment
risk, including possible loss of principal invested.
ClearStation is a registered trademark of ClearStation, Inc.
E*TRADE is a registered trademark of E*TRADE Securities,
Inc. Member NASD/SIPC.
Copyright (c) 2000. ClearStation, Inc. All rights reserved.


-----Original Message-----
From: Blair, Greg
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 3:45 PM
To: Blair, Greg; Arora, Harry
Cc: Cavazos, Brandon
Subject: RE: Synthetic Peaker

P.S.  I'm in NY, at home, if either of you need to speak with me.  516 746-1751.

-----Original Message-----
From: Blair, Greg
Sent: Fri 11/2/2001 3:43 PM
To: Arora, Harry
Cc: Cavazos, Brandon
Subject: RE: Synthetic Peaker

Harry and Brandon:

Just got off the phone with the customer.  Seems we were sufficiently off the market that they didn't see any upside in stringing us along.  I told them that the indicative price came from our structuring group and that we would now try to tighten things up directly with the desk.  Ergo, we get another shot.  Let's make it a good one.

-----Original Message-----
From: Arora, Harry
Sent: Fri 11/2/2001 12:38 PM
To: Blair, Greg
Cc:
Subject: RE: Synthetic Peaker

Greg

1. Who made these prices ?

2. Is this a into TVA product

3. Is this a 3 yr starting 2003 they are asking for ?

4. How much size are they interested in ?

5. Is this a day ahead 5x16 (16 hour minimum) product or is there a 4hr/8hr min ?

Harry

-----Original Message-----
From: Blair, Greg
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 12:25 PM
To: Arora, Harry; Cavazos, Brandon
Subject: FW: Synthetic Peaker

Harry and Brandon:

Apparently, we are not as competitive as we need to be here.  Let me know if there's anything we can do here to make this more attractive.  My quote to them is at the bottom of the thread.

-----Original Message-----
From: "Hilson, D. Wayne" <dwhilson@tva.gov>@ENRON
Sent: Fri 11/2/2001 11:07 AM
To: Blair, Greg
Cc: Goza, Stuart L.
Subject: RE: Synthetic Peaker

Greg:

We have completed our evaluation of the two proposed structures (1) May

through September and (2) June through August for a three year duration

beginning in 2003.  Unfortunately, based on the prices quoted below, neither

evaluates well enough that we would want to pursue any further.  We

appreciate your interest and remain interested in any future proposals you

may want to offer.

Regards,

Wayne Hilson

(4230 751-2916

 -----Original Message-----

From:   Greg.Blair@enron.com [ <mailto:Greg.Blair@enron.com>]

Sent:   Tuesday, October 23, 2001 5:33 PM

To:     dwhilson@tva.gov

Subject:        RE: Synthetic Peaker

Any idea on timing of a response?  Just curious.

    -----Original Message-----

   From:   "Hilson, D. Wayne" <dwhilson@tva.gov>@ENRON

   Sent:   Monday, October 15, 2001 4:06 PM

   To:     Blair, Greg

   Subject:  RE: Synthetic Peaker

   Thanks.

   We'll be in touch.

    -----Original Message-----

   From:   Blair, Greg [ <mailto:Greg.Blair@enron.com>]

   Sent:   Monday, October 15, 2001 3:32 PM

   To:     dwhilson@tva.gov

   Subject:     Synthetic Peaker

   Wayne:

   May 1 through Sep 30:  $5.83/kw-mo

   Jun 1 through Aug 31:  $8.78/kw/mo

   Heat Rate:   10,900

   VOM:         $1.63/MWh

   Term:        3 years

   Start:       2003

   Availability:     5x16

   Delivery:    Into TVA

   Regards, Greg

   **********************************************************************

   This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate

   and

   may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the

   intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by

   others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or

   authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or

   reply

   to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete

   all

   copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not

   intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence

   a

   binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its

   affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not

   be

   relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.

   Thank you.

   **********************************************************************


Done at last!  Whew, I'm whooped!  Now it's your turn to have fun!
Unfortunatel, I have a call into David Minns about one issue, and I hope when
he responds it doesn't change my approvals...


This deal also has firm energy while the counterparty says non-firm....?

---------------------- Forwarded by Kate Symes/PDX/ECT on 03/05/2001 12:06 PM
---------------------------

From: Kimberly Allen on 03/05/2001 11:15 AM CST
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: #516506

Tom entered this trade as Firm and FPL says on their confirmation as
Transmission Contingent. Which is correct?

KI

Enron Power Marketing, Inc.
Kimberly Indelicato Office:713-853-3031
Trading Support Fax:713-646-2443
kallen3@enron.com


Sorry for the mixup.  Attached is template for confirm and then the GTC
(minus tax reps).  I'm trying to fit in the tax reps in between phone calls
and will distribute to Susan Musch (tax) for review.

Stuart:  Who else should be on the review list?

 Thanks.  Sara


Please note: This e-mail is confidential and may also be privileged. Please
notify us immediately if you are not the intended recipient. You should not
copy it, forward it or use it for any purpose or disclose the contents to any
person.
-----------------------------------------------------------

Dear Mark

I attach a revised copy of the above document with a few minor corrections to
the text.

I am unable to attach Appendices A and B via email and these are being faxed
to you.

With kind regards.

Dr Ned Swan

------------------------------------------------------------
Simmons & Simmons
21 Wilson Street
London
EC2M 2TX

Tel +44 (0)20 7628 2020
Fax +44 (0)20 7628 2070
DX  12 London/Chancery Ln

An international law firm
London Paris Brussels Lisbon Milan Rome Abu Dhabi Hong Kong Shanghai New York

A list of partners at each office can be provided on request.

www.simmons-simmons.com

www.elexica.com is the award winning interactive online legal resource by
lawyers for lawyers, powered by content from Simmons & Simmons.

 - 147; 650FFC - Marketing of Futures and Options in the US.doc


Attached is a set of message points we developed with the finance group for use with our external audiences.


I have made one correction to Guadalupe's degree --- it is actually MA, Law
and Diplomacy rather than MS, Finance.
Here is the corrected version.


I bought 5.22, the bid is now at 5.28, what should i do?