[IMAGE] 	[IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
  [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   STOCK QUOTES:      [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] Please support our advertisers [IMAGE]  Sponsored by: INVESTools  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] His Picks Gain 58.8% in 1 Month - and They're Still Soaring!  The next bull market is underway! Don Rowe just pocketed a whopping 58.8% in one month (since 4/10) with his latest picks. They are still rocketing -- and so is his newest buy (Q1 earnings +500%). Get them today with your FREE trial: http://www.investools.com/c/ro/WALL/MNET1A-wallTU1?s=S600-S601  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  The Scoop [IMAGE]   Stocks Are Set to Open Flat Friday  Stocks are seen opening flat on Friday after Federal Reserve Chairman Alan  Greenspan said weak U.S. economic growth could continue but that deep interest- rate cuts should give support.  [Full Story ]    [IMAGE]  Sponsored by: Scottrade  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] Some Things Never Change: $7 Trades at Scottrade! Trade stocks for $7 at Scottrade.com, no matter how many shares you trade! Over 125 offices with personal brokers to service your account. Plan for your future - open an IRA today - no setup fees, no annual fees! Compare us to your broker ... Apply now! http://news.phase2media.com/moneynet_scottrade0301.asp  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  Inside Scoop  Living Large  Markets  Life Stages  Book Reviews   [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  Dow Jones  Dow Jones Ind 30  [IMAGE]  NASDAQ Comp.  NASDAQ Comp.  [IMAGE]    Most Popular Stocks   [IMAGE]  TXN  38.41 0.00    [IMAGE]  F  25.65 0.00    [IMAGE]  LU  9.53 0.00    [IMAGE]  CSCO  22.91 0.00    [IMAGE]  COMPX  2282.02 38.54    [IMAGE]  GENE  14.58 0.00    [IMAGE]  INDU  0.00 0.00    [IMAGE]  JDSU  22.55 0.00    [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]   money.net Feature  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] Now you can link back to Money.net no matter what site you're on with our new interactive Tool Bar. Jump to your streaming real time portfolio tracker, search for something on Google and check the latest sports scores with ESPN. Trust us, you will love this product!!!!!  www.athoc.com/wis/activate/default.asp?pid=20523&mktmsg=CA1   [IMAGE]   Don't forget to check out today's feature stories  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  Stocks Rise, Tech Rally Boosts Market   Investors keep focused on an economic recovery [Full Story ]  [IMAGE]  Stocks Mixed After Senate Switch, Weak Home Sales   Poor home sales and political maneuvering depress stocks [Full Story ]   [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]   If you have questions about our site, please email us at info@money.net .  If there's a subject you'd like to read about, please email us at editor@money.net .  To unsubscribe from this mailing, please click here  to go to http://www.money.net/scripts/unsubscribe .  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   ?2001 Money.net Incorporated .  Market Data Provided in part by: MarketFeed.com, Reuters, Inc.Reuters , S?Comstock.  All quotes delayed at least 15 minutes. (Except in Screamer - Real-Time Portfolio Tracker)  Charts provided by Goinvest.com, Inc.  Terms and Conditions   ? Privacy Policy   By accessing and using this page you agree to the Terms of Service .


To all

rough pass at EPC draw schedule in attached Excel for 2,3,4,5 and 6 unit
plants - assumes two week spacing on start up - based on normal simple cycle
deal. If we need to do major LM6000 payments up front then we should have a
front end weighted curve (I will go ahead and generate a front-ended curve
for each config) - depends on how we really extract each from WestLB deal -
above my pay grade to know those lofty things.

Data is based on ElectriCities installation schedule from Nepco, we are
working to see if we can compress actual time in field as part of reducing
project anticipated cost so might be better once Mike Coleman and Bruce work
our magic. % are from my vast experience and would be challenged and derided
if a real cost engineer looks at them but at least they add to 100% (I hope)
and sort of match our Hainan experience with three of these LM6000's.

Bruce


The attached will be the operating situations that we will cover.

David if you see anything that we need to revise before, please call.

DS


Congrats on your promotion to MD. I appreciate the work you group is doing
for ET&S, and I know the promotion is well deserved.

    Bill Cordes


Interest Rates Have Never Been More Attractive!
Now is the time to refinance your home, consolidate all of your high interest
credit card debt, and possibly receive up to 125% of your home's value.
Get all of the cash you'll need!
All USA Homeowners Easily Qualify!
Damaged Credit Is never a problem!
We work with hundreds of nation-wide lenders who are hungry
for your business and will provide you with the best deal on the INTERNET!
Our service is 100% free!

CLICK HERE For a No Obligation Quotation Today! <http://www.information-4you.com/mortgage/mort20.html>

****** AOL USERS ******
If the link above does not work, paste the web address below into your browser and hit GO.

http://www.information-4you.com/mortgage/mort20.html

REMOVAL INSTRUCTIONS: This message is being sent to you in compliance with the current Federal legislation. . If you do not want to receive further emails or any other information from us, or you have received this mail in error, for immediate removal you may simply use reply on your email program with "Remove from mailing list#10993" in the subject.


EPA and TVA have been negotiating for some time over possible settlements in
enforcement actions filed by EPA over modifications made to TVA power plants
in violation of New Source Review (NSR) rules.  Those negotiations to reach
an out-of-court solution have officially broken down, with TVA filing a
petition in federal court late yesterday opposing EPA's NSR enforcement
allegations.

While many felt TVA might settle with EPA (since it was government
negotiating with government), TVA has taken a very strong stance, indicating
that they made some offers to EPA but that EPA's unreasonable stance would
cause severe harm to grid reliability, the financial viability of TVA and
pocketbooks of the ratepayers.   Southern Company and Duke Energy filed
petitions supporting TVA.

EPA is insisting that these court filings will in no way stop the Agency from
pursuing NSR enforcement measures.

I will keep you posted as to any developments in negotiations or court
actions in this area.

Jeff Keeler
Director, Environmental Strategies
(202) 466-9157


Last week was the hardest week that our office has ever experienced.  When I look down the list of people who were laid off I see the names of some very talented people.  Things have unfolded so quickly -- the reality of the situation is settling in for me, and probably many of us, today.

Again, I wanted to express my thanks and gratitude to everyone on our floor -- both current and former employees.  In the interest of keeping people informed about who is here and who is gone, below is a complete list of layoffs done last week within the west power team.

Last Name	First Name
Coffer	Walter
Alport	Kysa
Ausenhus	Kara
Axford	Kathy
Bryson	Jesse
Burry	Jessica
Butler	Emily
Cadena	Angela
Chen	Andy
Chen	Lei
Cocke	Stan
Cox	Chip
Dalia	Minal
Deas	Patty
Frost	David
Fuller	Dave
Gang	Lisa
Guillaume	David
Hall	Erin
Harasin	Leaf
Linder	Eric
Mainzer	Elliot
Maxwell	Dan
McCarrel	Steven
Mehrer	Anna
Merriss	Steven
Merten	Eric
Miles	Darryl
Mullen	Mark
Mumm	Chris
Nalluri	Susmitha
Porter	David
Presto	Darin
Soderquist	Larry
Symes	Kate
Thome	Jennifer
Tully	Mike
Van Gelder	John
Warner	Nicholas
Wilson	Susan
Browner	Victor
Calvert	Gray
Carranza	Octavio
Ha	Vicki
Mara	Sue
Perrino	Dave
Qureishi	Ibrahim
Turnipseed	Edith
Wong	Michael


I still haven't received this database Tana.


Keith,

Attached is GTC Spot confirm form  and Spot GTC

Please take a look at the attached Spot GTC and let me know if we can
transact under
this contract.  This is what our legal guys would prefer.  Talk to you soon.

Thank you,

Kevin


It looks like you made quite a few changes to some deals and I don't see
anything in the comment section.  Can you just take a quick look and see if
you know what you changed on any of these.  If not, I can look it up in the
audit viewer, but it makes things go a lot quicker if we don't have to go
into the audit viewer for each deal.

Thanks!

#508957
#517889
#517881
#517880
#517878
#517875
#517874


The attached file contains our daily volume requirements for  4/14  and  the
following day(s) as listed .    There are three  worksheets labelled as
follows:

'Total Reqs':  Contains the volumes that CES is requesting from Enron at each
of the delivery points and dates indicated in the columns labelled "NOM".
The
Enron schedulers will want to check this sheet to see how much gas is needed
at
a specific point.   The AGL volumes are not timely and should be ignored until
further notice.    CES schedulers note:  the attached file is archived on
P:\Energy Ops\Enron\April_00\Daily\ *.xls, so you don't have to save a
duplicate copy elsewhere on the network.
'Daily Change' :  shows the change (increase +/decrease -) in the daily volume
needed from Enron at the designated citygate delivery point relative to the
supply volumes arranged previously with Enron prior to the current date.  For
the current gas day, the change is an intra-day change and is calculated using
the previous day's volume request for the current day (e.g., If the current
gas
day is 3/28, then the change is computed with respect to the 3/27 request for
3/28.  Note that this procedure assumes that the prior day supply change was
in
fact effectuated).  For tomorrow's gas day and any subsequent ones shown, the
change is computed as the latest Dth Nomination requirement less the
First-of-the-month supply volume plus or minus any adjustments made since the
first-of-the-month to the FOM supply for the (future) days shown.  (e.g., If
today is 3/28, then the change for 3/29, 3/30, etc. is computed with respect
to
the first-of-the-month volumes for those days adjusted for any additional
purchases or sell-backs since the first-of-the-month thru 3/27.)   This sheet
should be useful in determining prices for daily changes in gas volumes that
we
take or turn back.   The column labelled "ENA Daily Swing +/- vs FOM volume'
shows the absolute magnitude of the daily swings allowed by ENA at
pre-specified prices.  Prices for Swing volumes exceeding these magnitudes or
for swings at delivery points without pre-specified pricing must be
negotiated.
'COMMENTS' contains a (partial) list of day-to-day changes and issues of note.

Doug Kinney
Ph:  703-561-6339
Fax:  703-561-7317

 - 04-14-00 Daily VolsAM.xls


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Brent Hendry/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
05/11/99 04:06 PM ---------------------------

Don Black
05/11/99 06:42 PM
To: Randy Young/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Richard B Sanders@ECT,
Greg Whalley@ECT, Brent Hendry/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:
Subject: Duke claim against Enron

Although no formal notice has been rec'd from Duke, They have informed me
verbally that they do not intend to proceed with any claims against us.  If
you need any details please call me in BA or send me an email with your
contact instructions.  Given the nature of this topic I would prefer to
discuss my thoughts on the subject in person, if necessary.  Thanks for
everyone's help, and I apologise for any inconvenience.


- 2_5_02GO.xls
 - 2_5_02OH.xls


The attached file contains our daily volume requirements for  5/30 and  the
following day(s) as listed .    There are three  worksheets labelled as
follows:

'Total Reqs':  Contains the volumes that CES is requesting from Enron at each
of the delivery points and dates indicated in the columns labelled "NOM".
The
Enron schedulers will want to check this sheet to see how much gas is needed
at
a specific point.   The AGL volumes are not timely and should be ignored until
further notice.    CES schedulers note:  the attached file is archived on
P:\Energy Ops\Enron\May_00\Daily\ *.xls, so you don't have to save a duplicate
copy elsewhere on the network.
'Daily Change' :  shows the change (increase +/decrease -) in the daily volume
needed from Enron at the designated citygate delivery point relative to the
supply volumes arranged previously with Enron prior to the current date.  For
the current gas day, the change is an intra-day change and is calculated using
the previous day's volume request for the current day (e.g., If the current
gas
day is 3/28, then the change is computed with respect to the 3/27 request for
3/28.  Note that this procedure assumes that the prior day supply change was
in
fact effectuated).  For tomorrow's gas day and any subsequent ones shown, the
change is computed as the latest Dth Nomination requirement less the
First-of-the-month supply volume plus or minus any adjustments made since the
first-of-the-month to the FOM supply for the (future) days shown.  (e.g., If
today is 3/28, then the change for 3/29, 3/30, etc. is computed with respect
to
the first-of-the-month volumes for those days adjusted for any additional
purchases or sell-backs since the first-of-the-month thru 3/27.)   This sheet
should be useful in determining prices for daily changes in gas volumes that
we
take or turn back.   The column labelled "ENA Daily Swing +/- vs FOM volume'
shows the absolute magnitude of the daily swings allowed by ENA at
pre-specified prices.  Prices for Swing volumes exceeding these magnitudes or
for swings at delivery points without pre-specified pricing must be
negotiated.
'Comments':

Doug Kinney
Ph:  703-561-6339
Fax:  703-561-7317

 - 05-30-00 daily volsAM.xls


Mark, please let me know if this format suffices -- if so I will update this
for you every Monday -- thanks, Bob


pls print.  thanks df
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 08/03/2000
08:33 AM ---------------------------

	Elaine Concklin
	08/02/2000 05:27 PM

To: Bill Cordes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, John Dushinske/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew
Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mike
McGowan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kent Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay
Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michel Nelson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dave
Neubauer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rockey Storie/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Julia
White/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Danny
McCarty/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Virginia O'Neill/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Deb Cappiello/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Martha
Benner/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Audrey Robertson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dea
Crum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Sharon Solon/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Judy
Kudym/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ricki Winters/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Julie
McCoy/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rosemary Gracey/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Linda
Wehring/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kathy Campos/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Maria
Perales/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Elaine Concklin/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, David
Clements/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steve Gilbert/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, John
Fiscus/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Stephanie Korbelik/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Allen
Cohrs/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dana Jones/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ray
Stelly/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lindy Donoho/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin
Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Mike Zabawa/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rick
Dietz/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Vera Apodaca/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Henry
Baker/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steve Kleb/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Sophie
Patel/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Louis Soldano/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bob
Chandler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Preliminary 2001-2003 Business Plan and Assumptions

Please see Henry's note below.

Thanks!  Elaine

---------------------- Forwarded by Elaine Concklin/ET&S/Enron on 08/02/2000
05:19 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Henry Baker                           08/02/2000 04:02 PM

To: Elaine Concklin/ET&S/Enron
cc:

Subject: Preliminary 2001-2003 Business Plan and Assumptions

Attached are the preliminary 2001 - 2003 Business Plan and Assumption
schedules for NNG and TW.  Please review and update these schedules for the
2001 - 2003 Operating and Strategic Plan.  Keep in mind that these are the
preliminary assumptions that we will discuss in more detail during the
meeting on August 11th.  Please note that the attached Business Plan is a
high level version of the Focus Areas included in the detailed ET&S Business
Plan that was approved by the officers back in March.  Please provide us with
any updates/revisions by Wednesday, August 9th.  If you have any questions,
please give Henry Baker a call at (713) 853-4797 or Elaine Concklin at (713)
853-5521.

Thanks in advance for your assistance.


had to resend due to overworked network.  ss
---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 03/07/2000
05:42 PM ---------------------------

Sara Shackleton
03/07/2000 05:03 PM
To: Lynn Aven/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:
Subject: draft Argentina memo

please edit.  thanks.  sara


Yahoo! News	Edit Breaking News Alerts - Yahoo!

	Breaking News Alert	 edit
WASHINGTON _ House, upset at ouster of U.S. from rights panel, votes to
withold some U.N. dues.

	Click here!
	[IMAGE]

If you no longer wish to receive this alert, click here to unsubscribe.
If you have questions, send us feedback.

Copyright , 1994-2001 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved. Yahoo Privacy Policy


Great news. Thanks for the heads up. Rick


Attached is language which can be included in transactions involving power
trades (physical or financial) which provides for the following:

1. Alberta market opening condition in favour of Enron Canada for January 1,
2001; and
2. after market opening, provision for suspension of obligations in case
there is a legislative or regulatory event affecting the Sundance "B" PPA
which materially adversely impacts our ability to dispatch or sell the power
of the Sundance "B" PPA.

There is, of course, some risk that counterparties will want these provisions
to be bi-lateral, which could introduce the ability for the counterparty to
use these concepts to avoid the transaction if, for example, the market moves
against them.

Regards,
Peter


Jennifer;

Just a little more info with regard to the San Diego rate freeze
legislation.  SB 43 (the Alpert bill) was signed by the Governor April 6 and
filed with the Secretary of State April 9.  The language in the bill provides
that the frozen rate would apply to the energy component of electric bills
for electricity supplied to all customers by SDG&E not subject to the ceiling
imposed by existing law (ie residential, small commercial and street
lighting).  Review of that language would imply the rate freeze would not
apply to direct access customers.  One caveat however.  The CPUC must now
implement the passed legislation through its regulations.  While the intent
of the legislation seems clear, the past record of the CPUC in implementing
such legislative acts does not provide 100% assurance that logic will prevail.

As a footnote to the above, AB 43 (Correa - passing the Assembly and Senate
April 5) is a "companion clean-up" bill to SB 43.  This bill is almost
identical to SB 43 but reflects some limited technical corrections to SB 43.
To our knowledge, as of yesterday, AB 43 had not been signed by the Governor.

In addition, there have been repeated questions with regard to the
applicability of the 3 cent surcharge to direct access customers.
Unfortunately, the status of its applicability is still up in the air.
Various parties have raised this issue directly with the CPUC and in their
comments with respect to the rate design phase of its implementation and will
be one of the issues to be addressed (though perhaps not answered) next week
in the Commission's rate design hearing.

If you could forward this to the rest of the CA team it would be appreciated.


Stephanie:

Here's the contact info.  I don't think that this guy is a lawyer but I could
be mistakem.  Mention in the email that the draft was requested by Clint
Freeland with Enron Corp. and to let us know who will be negotiating for
CSFB.  Thanks.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 02/07/2001 09:32 AM -----

	Jeff Nogid
	01/23/2001 05:24 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Clint Freeland/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: ISDA Contact

Sara-

You can send the ISDA draft to:

Keith McNally
212-325-3633
Keith.McNally@csfb.com

Deals #s still pending.

Jeff Nogid
Enron Global Finance
713-853-4782


May cash $4.00

June Numbers
Nymx   $3.78
CNG Basis Bid  $.215
CNG Index Prem (.0075)

Net   $3.9875

actually losing $.01 or so before we figure the fuel of 1.95%

Fuel Cost at $4.00 = $4.00/(1-.0195) - $4.00 = $.08

Now its $.09 in the hole (.01+.08)


Are we still on?  Where do you want to go?  I was thinking Mexican, but let
me know what you think.

DG    713-853-9573


Prebon Energy has sent you an invitation from Sendomatic.com!

To view your invitation click the web address below or copy and paste it into your web browser:
http://www.sendomatic.com/servlets/v?e=63433&u=761191

If you are having trouble viewing the above web address, visit
http://www.sendomatic.com/servlets/l?u=mike.maggi@enron.com
and create an account to view the events you have received.

Hope you have fun!

--

P.S. If you'd like to send your own personalized invitations or announcements go to http://www.sendomatic.com


Was this the longest year of your life or what??

Pete


All,

When I set the date for the dinner at our house, I forgot that it was around "Spring Break".  So, not wanting to cause any conflict in schedule and wanting to help promote family time, I decided to CANCEL the dinner for March 16 and RESCHEDULE for another time.  Sarah and I look forward to having everyone over so we'll put our heads together and come up with a better date.

Hope this hasn't caused any inconvenience,

Mark

Mark McConnell
Transwestern Pipeline Company
713-345-7896   office
713-822-4862   cell
713-646-2551   fax
mark.mcconnell@enron.com


No need to perk up for me.  I should learn to live with you on days like
this.

Yes, I do need to pack/start laundry.  I'm flex for dinner.  Two
suggestions:

1. Eggs and bacon (me)/biscuits (you).  Dishes (me).  Walk with dogs (us).
2. Meet at home, slip into our running gear, grab the dogs, and go to
Memorial for a jog.  Stop on the way home and pick something up for dinner
(veggies with tofu).

-----Original Message-----
From: Sanchez, Monique [mailto:Monique.Sanchez@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 2:33 PM
To: jmenconi@adv-eng-ser-inc.com
Subject: yo

hey there,
wondering what you'd like to do tonight for dinner?
i know you probably need to do stuff like pack for germ.
i am supremely grouchy.  i will do my best to perk up for you when i get
home.
i forgot shoes so i will not be joining sue at hanks.
my plan was to go home....start drinking...and do some desk
work/sparebedroom work.
just shoot me a line when you get a chance...........latersky.
Mo.

 - winmail.dat


Elizabeth, I am responding to your voice mail that today's meeting is
canceled.  I agree with your suggestion that you, Mark, Jeff, Bill and Shari
can come to a conclusion and just let us know.

I believe the issues come down to:

1. risk of intentional default by our counterparty

2. risk of unintentional default by us

3. what the market is doing

As agreed at our last call, I reviewed the issues commercially here, and I
believe the commercial preference is to maintain cherry picking for the
reasons in 1 above.  Please let Greg and mw know what is decided.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Cannon, Lydia   On Behalf Of Zipper, Andy
Sent:	Friday, May 25, 2001 3:52 PM
Subject:	Celebration EnronOnline's Millionth Transaction - REVISED LINK

	In celebration of EnronOnline's one millionth transaction this week, we would like to invite you to a celebration party on 	Thursday, June 7th from 5- 8 p.m. at The Grasshopper (506 Main Street @ Prairie in downtown).  Please RSVP as soon as 	possible by clicking on the link below.

	http://207.21.193.94/invitation/

	I hope to see you there.

	Andy Zipper


Thanks for the copy.

I have already forwarded my comments and proposed changes to you via
messenger this morning.

Subject those forwarded changes its looks fine to me.

David Forster
03/07/2000 11:38 AM
To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jay Webb/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mario Parra Cardoso/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Emissions website Text

Mark/Harry,

Attached is a copy of the website text.

Please review and approve or suggest changes. We would like to be able to
start uploading this information later today, if possible.

Thanks,

Dave
---------------------- Forwarded by David Forster/LON/ECT on 03/07/2000 05:36
PM ---------------------------

Mario Parra Cardoso@ENRON
03/07/2000 04:07 PM
To: David Forster/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Emission Auctions: now with Louise's changes


SALES AGT: JS/ZA9WYV

                                          FULLER/DAVID

  ENRON
  121 SW SALMON ST
  3 WTC 03TF
  PORTLAND OR 97204
  ATTN-JESSICA BURRY

  DATE:  OCT 03 2000

SERVICE               DATE  FROM           TO             DEPART
ARRIVE

UNITED AIRLINES       04OCT PORTLAND OR    DENVER CO      1235P   356P
UA 1972    M          WED   INTERNATIONAL  DENVER INTL
           NON SMOKING
                            LUNCH                         NON STOP
                            RESERVATION CONFIRMED         2:21 DURATION
                  AIRCRAFT: BOEING 757-200/300
                            SEAT 13F NO SMOKING CONFIRMED FULLER/DAVID

UNITED AIRLINES       04OCT DENVER CO      PHOENIX AZ     440P    530P
UA 2779    M          WED   DENVER INTL    SKY HARBOR INT
           NON SMOKING                     TERMINAL 2
                                                          NON STOP
                            RESERVATION CONFIRMED         1:50 DURATION
                  AIRCRAFT: BOEING 737-500

CAR                   04OCT HERTZ                  PHOENIX AZ
                      07OCT CONFIRMATION: B2302FACA03GOLD
                            TELEPHONE: 1-602-267-8822.
                            FAX: 1-602-267-4960.
                            FULL 4-DOOR CAR AUTOMATIC AIR
                            RATE: USD54.00- .00 UNL DY 18.00- UNL XH
                            RATE QUOTED
                            PICK-UP: SKY HARBOR AP 500 S  22ND ST
                            DROP-OFF: SKY HARBOR AP 500 S  22ND ST

HOTEL                 04OCT MARRIOTT STE SCOTTSDALE OLD TW
                      07OCT 7325 EAST THIRD AVENUE
                            SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85251
                            UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
                            TELEPHONE: 1-480 9451550
                            FAX: 1-480 9452005
                            CONFIRMATION: 81074339
                            REFERENCE: THOF00
                            SINGLE ROOM
                            RATE: THR USD 152.00 PER NIGHT
                            GUARANTEE GIVEN
                            RQST NS KING
       *24* HOUR ADVANCE XCL POLICY AT THE MARRIOTT STE SCOTTSDALE

UNITED AIRLINES       07OCT PHOENIX AZ     LOS ANGELES CA 412P    529P
UA 2538    M          SAT   SKY HARBOR INT INTL
           NON SMOKING      TERMINAL 2     TERMINAL 7
                                                          NON STOP
                            RESERVATION CONFIRMED         1:17 DURATION
                  AIRCRAFT: BOEING 737-500

UNITED AIRLINES       07OCT LOS ANGELES CA PORTLAND OR    750P    1003P
UA 2614    M          SAT   INTL           INTERNATIONAL
           NON SMOKING      TERMINAL 7
                                                          NON STOP
                            RESERVATION CONFIRMED         2:13 DURATION

                  AIRCRAFT: BOEING 737-500

RESERVATION NUMBER(S)  UA/QGS12Q

FULLER/DAVID                             TICKET:UA/ETKT 016 7015987516

UA  FREQUENT FLYER UA00123750730
***********************************************
THIS IS A TICKETLESS RESERVATION. PLEASE HAVE A
PICTURE ID AVAILABLE AT THE AIRPORT. THANK YOU
***********************************************
NON-REFUNDABLE TICKET MINIMUM $75.00 CHANGE FEE
***********************************************
                  THANK YOU FOR CALLING VITOL TRAVEL

=====
VITOL TRAVEL
1100 LOUISIANA STE-3230
HOUSTON TX 77002
713-759-1444 - PHONE
713-759-9006 - FAX

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Photos - 35mm Quality Prints, Now Get 15 Free!
http://photos.yahoo.com/


FYI.  Any thoughts Joe & Co.? Is release from contracts an "increase supply"
option?  My fear is that QFs get released and then California's "police
state" mentality kicks in, enacting Exec Orders, legislation, etc. to ensure
that the power from the QF facilities stays in California.

Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 03/20/2001 10:00 AM -----

	Chris H Foster@ECT
	03/20/2001 07:30 AM

		 To: Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Ridgewood's Petition To Be Released From QF Contracts

We are trying to set up energy purchasing arrangements with QFs who get
temporarily released from their contracts.  Take a look at the e-mail below
and see if we can suport them.

Thanks

C
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT on 03/20/2001
05:26 AM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Short, Bill" <BSHORT@ridgewoodpower.com>
03/19/2001 03:59 PM

To: "Michael Davis (E-mail)" <mdavis02@coral-energy.com>, "Frank Eckhart
(E-mail)" <ffec@dynegy.com>, "Steve B. Van Leer (E-mail)"
<sbvanleer@duke-energy.com>, "Doug Fernley (E-mail)"
<doug.fernley@elpaso.com>, "Chris H. Foster (E-mail)"
<chris.h.foster@enron.com>, "Jack Pyburn (E-mail)"  <jack.pyburn@mirant.com>,
"Mark Thompson (E-mail)"  <mark.thompson@nrgenergy.com>, "Marvin (\"Trip\")
K. Ballard (E-mail)"  <marvin_k_ballard@reliantenergy.com>, "Shawn Nichols
(E-mail)"  <shawn.nichols@williams.com>, "Kyle T. Hoffman (E-mail)"
<khoffman@caiso.com>
cc: "Bahrs, John" <jbahrs@ridgewoodpower.com>, "Gulino, Dan"
<dgulino@ridgewoodpower.com>, "Holmes, Randy"  <Rholmes@ridgewoodpower.com>,
"Kawash, David"  <dkawash@ridgewoodpower.com>, "Naunton, Chris"
<Cnaunton@ridgewoodpower.com>, "Quinn, Marty"  <Mquinn@ridgewoodpower.com>
Subject: Ridgewood's Petition To Be Released From QF Contracts

 <<Comments_of_Ridgewood_letter_docket_no._EL01-47.DOC>>  <<RIDGEWOOD
_REQUEST_FOR_EXTENSION-FILING _3601.DOC>>

Gentlemen,

In light of the possible backouts in California today and later this week,
if it is possible, Ridgewood Power requests that your organization intervene
in support of the attached emergency filing at the FERC.  Please send this
e-mail to your firm's general counsel and ask him to contact either our
Washington counsel, Carol Smoots (202-496-7196), our general counsel, Dan
Gulino (800-331-8006, x-118) or me at (800-331-8006, x-163).  Any help would
be most appreciated.

Sincerely yours,

Bill Short

 - Comments_of_Ridgewood_letter_docket_no._EL01-47.DOC
 - RIDGEWOOD _REQUEST_FOR_EXTENSION-FILING _3601.DOC


Start Date: 1/3/02; HourAhead hour: 7;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002010307.txt


I have completed the setup of the two Counterparties with the exception of SAP ID's.  I am waiting for the SAP run to complete and will resend this message with the SAP Customer and Vendor Numbers when the SAP job completes.
Bill
  I have setup two External Counterparties for the Estate Test today (Sunday) as follows:
	1) CP ID#167032
	- External Gas/Power 1 (with good credit)
	- Address Number 193019
	- SAP Customer ID  Waiting for SAP Run to complete and return ID
	- SAP Vendor ID  Waiting for SAP Run to complete and return ID
	- 1 wire will be shared; Partner Bank Niumber 0011
	- ERMS Code; EXTERNALGAS1W
	- Financial Link
	- Power-Houston Link
	- Person Contact Link; Test Estate
	- Operational Effective Date; 12/01/2001
	- Fax Number; 713-646-8876
	- Address Roles
	ENA
	o Financial Invoice, Financial Payment, Financial Confirm
	o Natural Gas Physical Invoice, Natural Gas Physical Payment, Natural Gas Physical Confirmation
	o Power Financial Invoice, Power Financial Payment, Power Financial Confirmation
	o Service Physical Invoice, Service Physical Payment
	EPMI
	o Power Physical Invoice, Power Physical Payment, Power Physical Confirmation

	2) CP ID# 167034
	- External Gas/Power 2 (with Bad credit)
	- ERMS Code; EXTERNALGAS2PW


John

The attached has the arbitrage conditions that need to be checkrd for skew
curves.  Let's get together if you have questions or comments.

We are starting the design of the checks for the Excel pricing  workbook as
we discussed.

Bob


Start Date: 4/20/01; HourAhead hour: 19;  HourAhead schedule download failed.
Manual intervention required.


that is fine


Mark,

Please call me re: verbatim use of wording between EOL and Confirms.

Also:

PCGs are checking back with confirms people regarding index descriptions and
location, to make sure things are properly covered off. They are also going
through the descriptions to identify cases where traders have grabbed
incorrect items against the products they have created. Additional system
controls are going in today and into next week to stop this sort of error
from happening.

Dave


We have a game tonight at 6:45.  Please try to be there by 6:30.  Let me know
whether or not you will be at the game.

Eric


you never need to ask.  you can always use me as a reference.  what's it for?

	Cameron Sellers <cameron@perfect.com>
	09/20/2000 02:44 PM

		 To: "'jdasovic@enron.com'" <jdasovic@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: mendo road

I want to use you as a personal reference.  Is that OK?  I need your title
and direct dial number (i think it's 415-782-7822).  Write back soon.

-----Original Message-----
From: Eldon Sellers
To: jdasovic@enron.com
Cc: cameron@perfect.com; psellers@pacbell.net
Sent: 9/20/00 12:37 PM
Subject: mendo road

We want to go ahead with the road repair.  Nancy said the cost was about
$900.  However, we want to hold off on doing the stumps.  Nancy doesn't
think we go there often enough to spend the money right now to do that.
Can
anything be done about the culvert that didn't entail too much expense?

I'm having difficulty finding out what the duty is on the wine we
brought in
here.  If you could, without spending a lot of time, find out what it
costs
per liter above the 3 liter amount you can bring into Mexico duty-free.
It
would help us negotiate with the authorities here if we knew what the
amount
should be.

________________________________________________________________________
_
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at
http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.


No intent to make people pay twice.  Anticipated that Edison might not want
to be at risk for costs associated with retail gen service (e.g., AS, GMC,
shaping) while only allowed to charge the wholesale price.  Any changes
necessary to ensure no double counting are welcome.

Also, if 30 days seems to short to for some customers do strike a deal with
either the utility or an ESP, then it might be appropriate, and I wouldn't
object, to extending it to 90 days.  In my conversation with Dorothy, both 30
and 90 came up.  90 is reasonable, but it would seem to be the uppermost
limit.

Thanks very much for the comments.

Best,
Jeff

	BRBarkovich <brbarkovich@earthlink.net>
	07/09/2001 06:12 PM

		 To: dhunter@s-k-w.com
		 cc: Ann.Cohn@sce.com, "'Dorothy Rothrock (E-mail)'" <drothrock@cmta.net>,
"'John Fielder (E-mail)'" <fieldejr@sce.com>, "'Phil Isenberg (E-mail)'"
<isenberg@hmot.com>, "'Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)'" <jdasovic@enron.com>, "'Keith
McCrea (E-mail)'" <kmccrea@sablaw.com>, "'Linda Sherif (E-mail)'"
<lys@a-klaw.com>, "'Linda Sherif (E-mail 2)'" <lysherif@yahoo.com>, "'Gary
Schoonyan (E-mail)'" <schoongl@sce.com>, "'John White (E-mail)'"
<vjw@cleanpower.org>, "Dominic DiMare (E-mail)"
<dominic.DiMare@calchamber.com>
		 Subject: Re: REVISED Merged Leg Document

I do not agree with Jeff's changes to Dorothy's language and I am not sure if
Dorothy does.
In particular, I don't know what is meant by the language in the definition
of Spot Market
Service which says "and shall include all costs incurred by the electrical
corporation to
provide retail electric service" which seems to me to go way beyond even
energy service.  I
am also concerned that there be no way that customers have to pay for A/S
twice.

Second, I think 30 days is too short a time for a customer on Spot Market
service to elect
DA or Term Service, since if the UDC is providing Term Service on a best
efforts basis, that
option might not even be available within 30 days.  Barbara

Delaney Hunter wrote:

> Folks-
> Sorry for the delay --- major computer problems over here. I have used Ann's
> document and added the changes I made as a template. It is in redline and
> the questions are highlighted as well. Please look over it carefully and if
> there is language you are going to provide please do it post haste.
>
> WE WILL NOT HAVE A 2:00 CALL --- I think most folks are just too damn busy.
> So, if there is a question, problem, disagreement, etc on language please
> work it out amongst yourselves and send me new language if applicable.
> Remember this is due to Rick BY 5:00 PM TODAY!!!!!
>
> Call me with questions,
> Delaney
>
>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                                       Name: REVISED Merged Leg Language.doc
>    REVISED Merged Leg Language.doc    Type: Microsoft Word Document
(application/msword)
>                                   Encoding: base64


Andrew,
Vince and Grant from Research would like to have RiskTrack on their PCs.
Can you install it for them?

Appreciate it,

Tanya.


I am ok as long as you and Alan are ok.  Mark

-----Original Message-----
From: Bruce, Robert
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 11:18 AM
To: Aronowitz, Alan; Haedicke, Mark E.
Subject: FW: Gas Commodity Markets Treatise

I had submitted the 2001 update to Ken Raisler for an accuracy check.  His comments are very minor and look like they can be addressed without much re-writing. -- Bob

-----Original Message-----
From: Raislerk@sullcrom.com [mailto:Raislerk@sullcrom.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 11:05 AM
To: Bruce, Robert
Subject: Gas Commodity Markets Treatise

I had only a few minor comments and nits.  It looks very good to me.
   The following files have been attached to this mail by DeltaView...

Redline.rtf  ( Rich Text Format )
 <<Redline.rtf>>

----------------------------------

This e-mail is sent by a law firm and contains information
that may be privileged and confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and notify us
immediately.


Suzanne,

Next time you talk to Liz Gras would you pass along my phone number and email.  I am anxious to correspond with her and see where she is in the process and her thoughts about travel plans.

I know that the adoption agency wants to group the Taraz families together for court dates/travel.  One of the other Houston families (Swangos) has made progress on their dossier and turned in their INS approval.  The other (the Westbrooks) haven't yet applied for passports or begun their dossier.  I want to be very supportive and accomodate all the families -- after all the goal line is home for all these children.  At the same time, I need to form realistic concepts of likely timeframes for our family.  I think talking to Liz will be helpful on this front.

Thanks for all your help.  After you make the homestudy changes noted below you will resend to Gwyn?  Then she'll send to me to send to INS?  Probably sometime next week?

I'm planning to take a vacation day tomorrow -- and the type A person that I am, I'm just afraid that I'll miss some important action that I should be taking.  You can reach me on my cell at 713-857-2103 if you need to reach me tomorrow.

-----Original Message-----
From: tina whiteman [mailto:twhiteman@austin.rr.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 1:51 AM
To: Corman, Shelley
Subject: Fw: ADOPTION HOME STUDY

Shelley,

We will need to change the address and then get it all signed again.  It is good to know that the study overall meets their requirements.  This is probably going to take a few more days.  Still, it is better to have all of this taken care of now than to have someone send the study back.

Sorry for the delay.

Suzanne

----- Original Message -----
From: ginger <mailto:ginger@ffcadopt.com>
To: tina whiteman <mailto:twhiteman@austin.rr.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 10:49 PM
Subject: Re: ADOPTION HOME STUDY

Dear Suzanne,
I reviewed the homestudy you emailed to Ginger and it looks good.Please
change the address for Across the World to :399 Taylor Boulevard,Suite
102,
Pleasant Hill, California 94523.That is the address for the main office in
Calif. I did notice that MARITAL was spelled marial in the marital
section.
I'm sure your spellcheck probably caught it.I noticed that you mentioned
the" Republic of Kazakhstan" quite a few times. I'm not sure if that is
the
correct name of the country. I will check and let you know if you need to
change it.There is only one other thing that needs to be changed .It is
located about the last paragraph of recommendation where you state that
"the
family is excited to experience the Russian culture".That statement would
be
very offensive to the Kazakhstan officials if you were to mention Russian
culture. These people are not part of Russia-they are Kazakhstani- and a
very proud people.So you could just change the word Russian to Kazakhstan.
They do not like to be referred to as Russian.Let me know if you have any
questions. I left you a message to call me but I don't think you need to
call back unless you have questions. Please make sure that there is a
current agency license at the back of the homestudy when the family sends
their homestudy to me. I will be the one helping Ginger go thru everything
so if you have questions feel free to call Ginger or me.
Chris

tina whiteman wrote:

Ginger, It was so nice to talk with you.  Please find attached a copy of Shelley Corman and Kim Erb's homestudy. Thanks, Suzanne Hoffman(512)335-0536


Enron U.S. Employees:

The period during which Enron U.S. employees were afforded an opportunity to
make expressions of interest to acquire shares of common stock  of TNPC, Inc,
an affiliate of Enron Corp., pursuant to the Reserved Share Program ended on
Monday, October 2, 2000.  PaineWebber Incorporated will contact all persons
who expressed an interest in the Reserved Share Program on or before such
expiration date.

In connection with such program, the Securities and Exchange Commission has
requested that PaineWebber inform participants in the TNPC, Inc. Reserved
Share Program that by acknowledging in the Expression of Interest Form for
TNPC, Inc. that they have received and read the preliminary prospectus, they
have in no way waived any rights under the federal securities laws of the
United States.

The following statements are required to be included in this E-Mail by the
rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission:

 "A registration statement relating to the shares has been filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission but has not yet become effective.  These
securities may not be sold nor may offers to buy be accepted prior to the
time the registration statement becomes effective.  This E-Mail shall not
constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy nor shall
there be any sales of these securities in any state in which such offer,
solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior to registration or qualification
under the securities laws of any such state."

 "No offer to buy the securities can be accepted and no part of the purchase
price can be received until the registration statement has become effective,
and any such offer may be withdrawn or revoked, without obligation or
commitment of any kind, at any time prior to notice of its acceptance given
after the effective date.  An indication of interest in response to this
advertisement will involve no obligation or commitment of any kind."


Start Date: 10/14/01; HourAhead hour: 5;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001101405.txt

Error retrieving HourAhead price data - process continuing...


Mark,
FYI - as requested by Vicki. I hope you had (or have) as smooth a trip back as possible under the circumstances.

Regards,
Ed
---------------------- Forwarded by Edwin Essandoh/HOU/EES on 09/16/2001 12:04 AM ---------------------------

Edwin Essandoh
09/16/2001 12:03 AM
To:	Brent Hendry/Enron@EnronXGate, Elsa Piekielniak/ENRON@enronXgate, Ted Noble/ENRON@enronXgate, Timothy M Norton/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:	Denise Furey/ENRON@enronXgate, Ken Gustafson/HOU/EES@EES, Shelly Stubbs/Enron@EnronXGate, Beth Apke/HOU/EES@EES, Sean A Holmes/HOU/EES@EES, Brenda F Herod/Enron@EnronXGate
Subject:	RE: Derivatives Contract

I have revised and attached clean and blacklined drafts of the Confirmation and the Terms and Conditions distributed on Friday (attached to Brent's message below), but have some questions about paragraph (d) of the Fallback Methodology section of the Confirmation as written in the prior draft:

	(1) The section titled "Premium Payment Details"  (page 1) calls for payment of the Premium (presumably, by Counterparty or the buyer of the option) two 	Business Days following execution of the confirmation.  Is this in lieu of or in addition to the Premium payment called for in paragraph (d)?  I think it works 	only if the Premium payment made two days following execution of the Confirmation was made by Counterparty to EES (the Floating Amount Payor) and 	the payment in (d) is intended to be a refund of the Premium back to Counterparty by EES.

	(2) Paragraph (d) makes reference to the higher of "two Cash Settlement Amount Calculations."   There appears to be only one Cash Settlement Amount 	calculation (an option versus eg. a swap).  Is "Cash Settlement Amount" intended to include the Premium?

	(3) I think the proviso at the end of paragraph (b) applies to paragraph (d) as well (and to the entire Confirmation) and perhaps should come after (d).

The comments in the Fallback Methodolody section reflect my suggestions as well as my understanding of the mechanics  of that section.   Also, to make the document easier to review, and because it is the most likely scenario, the revised draft assumes EES is the seller of the option (i.e. the Floating Amount Payer), and our Customer the buyer of the option (Fixed Amount Payer).   Please let me have your comments ASAP.

We will have a final draft product for general distribution after we incorporate any revisions (including any comments from the addressees) into the attached drafts.

Thanks,
Ed

X58939

---------------------- Forwarded by Edwin Essandoh/HOU/EES on 09/15/2001 06:52 PM ---------------------------
From:	Brent Hendry/ENRON@enronXgate on 09/14/2001 05:23 PM
To:	Edwin Essandoh/HOU/EES@EES, Elsa Piekielniak/ENRON@enronXgate, Ted Noble/ENRON@enronXgate, Timothy M Norton/ENRON@enronXgate, Denise Furey/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:
Subject:	RE: Derivatives Contract

Here is the revised blacklined draft of the confirmation.  Please read the Determination of Missing Data section very carefully.  I have incorporated the last two subsections into (b) and (d) for simplification.  I am also attaching the Terms and Conditions that Ed finalized yesterday.  Please forward to anyone else who needs to review this document and let me know if you have any questions or comments.
Ed, can you fill in the missing numbers in the letterhead?

Thanks,
Brent


Enclosed is an omnibus worksheet for Brothers Production Company, Inc.  Other than the name and address, it is identical to an omnibus sent out for Moriah Properties, Ltd.  Please prepare and send to confirms with a copy to me.

Thanks,

Max


Attached is the final draft with minor changes made by David Gorte (along with a copy marked to show the changes).

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Koogler, David
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 3:33 PM
To:	Stabler, Frank; Waddell, Rick; Haedicke, Mark E.; Mintz, Jordan; Donahue, Jeff; Duke, Cullen; 'randelyoung4@hotmail.com'
Cc:	Gorte, David
Subject:	CEG DASH (Final)

Gentlemen, Attached is the final form of CEG DASH (along with a copy marked to show the changes made to the 11-21-01 v3 draft previously circulated to you).

Cullen, please print and execute the signature page and send the executed signature page to me.

Jeff and Jordan, I will bring this with me to our 5:00 meeting for your signatures.

David Gorte will obtain all other signatures.

If you have any questions or comments call me or David Gorte.

Regards,
David


Lewis Eugene Adkins
	9214 Sanford
	Houston, TX 77031

	DL# 04165772

	Larry's cell 713-628-0674


Steve,

Per your request, I've attached a summary of credit exposure with PG&E as of
close of business on February 28th. We are investigating an increase in our
overall position as a result of basis movement in the west over the past few
days.

Please feel free to give me a call at 35856 if I can provide futher
information.


I've spoken with Tim Cannon at Sempra, who said that what he needed was for
our broker and his broker to talk to each other and agree that this deal has
gone physical and is no longer on NYMEX. Then I talked to Matt Motley, who
talked to his broker, who will now talk to Sempra's broker and hopefully
solve this once and for all.

You're right though. There's no need for it to be this difficult, especially
when we do it every month. I think it would be really helpful if we could get
a hold of Dave Dupre to find out how this was handled before. If we can't, I
guess we'll just have to determine who will take responsibility for making
sure these deals are recognized as physical by both parties. I would be happy
to do that each month when we exercise our futures options, but I want
everyone involved to be aware of the procedure.

Thanks a lot for helping on this. Please let me know if you find out anymore.

Thanks,
Kate

Melissa Ann Murphy
12/05/2000 06:45 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Futures Deal w/ Sempra

Hello, I left a message for David Dupre and he has not called me back.  If
you want to have Matt call Tim Cannon at Sempra that would be fine.  His
phone number is (203) 355-5190.  I don't know why this has been so
difficult.  If I hear from David I will let you know.  I want to know how he
handled these deals in the past.

Thanks,
Melissa
(713) 853-1886

   Kate Symes                12/04/2000 06:31 PM

To: Melissa Ann Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Futures Deal w/ Sempra

Just curious - did you ever catch up with Larry Joe Hunter regarding the Long
Term Southwest desk's futures deal with Sempra? I'm wondering if I should
grab Matt Motley before he goes home today to let him know he needs to get a
hold of Tim Cannon about the ADT. Let me know when and if you talk to him.

Thanks,
Kate


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT on 11/16/2000
02:50 PM ---------------------------
To: Faith Killen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: West Gas 2001 Plan

Faith,

 Regarding the 2001 plan, the members of the west desk are as follows:

 Name   Title

 Trading
 Phillip Allen  VP
 Mike Grigsby  Director
 Keith Holst  Manager(possible Director)
 Janie Tholt  Director
 Steve South  Director
 Frank Ermis  Manager
 Tori Kuykendall  Manager
 Matt Lenhart  Analyst(possible associate)
 Monique Sanchez Commercial Support Manager
 Jay Reitmeyer  Senior Specialist
 Ina Rangel  Assistant (split costs with middle market)

 Marketing

 Barry Tycholiz  Director
 Mark Whitt  Director
 Paul Lucci  Manager (possible Director)
 2-3 TBD

Do I need to give you the names of our operations group?

Special Pays-  I believe Mike Grigsby has a retention payment due this year.
Also we should budget for another $150,000 of special payments.

I know you have been working with Barry T.  if his headcount is different on
the Marketing staff use his numbers.  Let me know if there is anything else
you need.

Phillip


Start project  with Elene for Mark


- MVC-016S.JPG
 - MVC-012S.JPG
 - MVC-013S.JPG
 - MVC-014S.JPG
 - MVC-015S.JPG
 - MVC-011S.JPG


he is free.  they are getting him at the min.  he will be a good back up.  he
just wants a chance to win a ring.


THE STAFF MEETING HAS BEEN CANCELED FOR TODAY...

T.Jae Black
East Power Trading
Assistant to Kevin Presto
off. 713-853-5800
fax 713-646-8272
cell 713-539-4760


$25 not applicable to those on vacation. Bet they love the lime shirt down
there.

From: Jeff Dasovich on 03/28/2001 09:04 PM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: Campaign Leadership Call "Mandatory"

Rick:

My apologies.  The family events here in Mexico have conflicted with the
calls.  But I will be on the call tomorrow.  (Anything to save $25!)

One thing. I'm not sure that I can dial into an 800 number here in Mexico.
Ginger:  Could I possibly call you at 4:30 and have you conference me in to
the 800 number?

Best,
Jeff

	Ginger Dernehl
	03/28/2001 11:46 AM

		 To: Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Janel
Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Howard Fromer/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan M Landwehr/NA/Enron@Enron, Daniel
Allegretti/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Cindy Derecskey/Corp/Enron@Enron, Marcia A Linton/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda
J Noske/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lysa Akin/PDX/ECT@ECT, Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron@Enron,
Bernadette Hawkins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lora Sullivan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Terri
Miller/NA/Enron@Enron, Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Campaign Leadership Call "Mandatory"

Message from Rick:

The Campaign Leadership Call, which takes place daily at 4:30pm CST, is
"Mandatory".  If you are unable to attend, it will be necessary for you to
have someone participate on the call in your behalf.  Please notify Rick or
myself,  if you are unable to participate and let us know who will be
participating for you.  A fine of $25.00 will be assessed to those who do not
participate or have someone participate for them.  The monies collected will
go to a charity of the group's choice.

Thanks and please don't hesitate to call me if you have any questions.

gngr
713-853-7751


The attached file contains our daily volume requirements for   3/31 thru 4/3
.    There are two worksheets:  The one labelled with today's date contains
the
volumes that we need at each of the delivery points indicated.   The
schedulers
will want to check this sheet to see how much gas is needed at a specific
point.    The AGL volumes are not current and should be ignored.

The sheet labelled 'Daily Change' shows the change (increase +/decrease -) in
the requested daily volume relative to a prior value.  For the current gas
day,
the change is an intra-day change and is calculated using the previous day's
volume request for the current day (e.g., If the current gas day is 3/28, then
the change is computed with respect to the 3/27 request for 3/28).  For
tomorrow's gas day and any subsequent ones shown, the change is computed using
the First-of-the-month volumes requested for those days.  (e.g., If today is
3/28, then the change for 3/29, 3/30, etc. is computed with respect to the
first-of-the-month volumes for those days.)   This sheet should be useful in
determining prices for daily changes in gas volumes that we take or turn back.

Doug Kinney
Ph:  703-561-6339
Fax:  703-561-7317

 - 03-31-00daily volsAM.xls


In rereading your email from 11/1/01, whether Enron is the survivor of the merger makes no difference, as long as, if it's not the survivor, the survivor assumes the obligations.  Nothing seems to be triggered in the provisions described, as long as (1) the survivor has equal or better or investment-grade credit, which we assume will be the case, (2) the deal is done with approval of the Enron board, which has occurred, and (3) Enron survives or the survivor assumes, which would be case if we switch to a structure in which Enron does not survive.

Does any of the recipients disagree?


And to buy my g.d. ring?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Immer, Ingrid" <Ingrid.Immer@Williams.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Wednesday, January 23, 2002 11:36 AM
To:	Germany, Chris
Subject:	I'm going to take this Fri off.  My goal will be to pack 1 box.


There is a demand charge of  $-.22 x 900000 on this deal ticket.  I think the
demand charge should be $-.22 x 10,000 x # days on the month.  This equals
900,000 over the term of the deal.  I changed the demand charge volume to
310,000  for Dec
310,000 for Jan
280,000 for Feb

Audrey, the global contract is 96017642 and 12/2000 is the first month of
this deal.  We should receive and invoice from COH for the demand charge.
There is a very slim chance we will be selling COH any gas on this deal for
the month.  Would you forward this email to the person that handles COH?

Thanks
chris

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 12/05/2000 08:08
AM ---------------------------

Chris Germany
12/04/2000 01:56 PM
To: Kimat Singla/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alvin Thompson/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: CGAS deal 213360

ENA has a put to COH (deal 213360) for up to 10,000 dth/day.  This deal was
in the system for December and I just took it to 0 for the whole month.  I
estimate we should make about $495,000 on the deal change.

Kimat, this deal also has a demand charge that ENA pays COH for the put.  I
believe its in the deal correctly.

Alvin, please show this on the morning sheet as a "Put to COH at IF" or
something real intelligent like that.

This deal goes thru 2/28/01.


---------------------- Forwarded by Ami Chokshi/Corp/Enron on 12/22/99 08:19
AM ---------------------------

dscott1@columbiaenergygroup.com on 12/21/99 08:06:49 PM
To: Ami Chokshi/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Misc. Questions

Questions:

1.  At Agua Dulce, which pipe can the GP plant go into? Can it go into HPL?

2. Do you have nom forms for any plant nominations we may need?

3. For GEMC, is the Tejas plant at Thompsonville? Do you know how any of
those points tie into HPL?

4. Do you have avails for MOPS production? The gas that is transported to
Tivoli--what contract do you use?

5. For Kerr McGee, do you have the Entex contacts you speak with?

6. Is there a Waskom nom form? With whom do you speak over there?

7. For the avails sheet you sent, the first row of column titles is blacked
out. Can you tell me what the row reads?

8. What volumes will come from Koch Gathering into Carthage for next month?
We show conflicting numbers.

Thanks,
Ami
713/853-9272

Here goes ...

1.  I know Tennessee, HPL, and Tejas are at the tailgate of the plant, and I
suspect Midcon Texas is there as well.

2.  I'll fax you a copy of the nomination form that Steve Locke uses for Agua
Dulce and Carthage ... those are the only ones in Texas that we nominate.

3.  The Tejas Plant as well as all of the other Gulf Energy receipt points
from
PennzEnergy are exclusively Tejas/Gulf Energy points, and it takes transport
charges to move the gas through Gulf Energy to interconnects, such as
Thompsonville.  The Jennings Plant does have a split connect with Delhi, but
operationally PennzEnergy much prefers to flow into Gulf Energy (lower
pressure
= higher volumes).

4.  Mustang Island 759 for January is again 1,903 mmbtu/d, which Peoples will
pick up at the wellhead.  Mustang Island 785 is 4,100/d, which leaves 2,200/d
available to sell assuming we continue to transport 1,895/d to FGT/Tivoli for
Peoples.  Our IT agreement on NNG is #78581 to move gas from the wellhead to
onshore.

5.  The Tomcat gas has been sold to Entex into Midcon Texas for so long that I
don't think Maria even talks to them anymore each month.  Tammi provides them
with the volume when she does the deal each month.  But we can certainly
provide an Entex contact if the gas is sold to them again in January.

6.  There isn't a Waskom nomination form.  The trader for this gas, Mike
Landolt, talks to Ben Britten (President of New Waskom Gas Gathering and
Waskom
Gas Marketing).

7.  You must be referring to the page of offshore avails that begins with
Sabine Pass 13.  The 6 columns that appear blacked out read as follows:  PVR,
PVR, Avail, DBQ, DBQ, and Remainder.

8.  The Koch-gathered volumes behind the Carthage Plant for 1/00 are 12,443
mmbtu/d.

David
---------------------- Forwarded by Ami Chokshi/Corp/Enron on 12/22/99 08:19
AM ---------------------------

dscott1@columbiaenergygroup.com on 12/21/99 08:20:28 PM
To: Ami Chokshi/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: More Questions

1.  At Carthage, the deliveries to Koch? What is that 15000 on your
whiteboard for. Who is it to? Are the volumes termed up?

2.  At Midcon Texas, you usually sell all the supply to its marketing
affiliate, correct? Is so, is that gas termed up or do you sell it month to
month?

3. Is the gas to Entex off Tomcat sold as base or swing? Don't they change
the volume occasionally?Has Anadarko given you any avails for Jan?

Round 2:

1.  The 15,000 @ Carthage for Koch is an estimate of what we anticipate we
will
want to sell into Koch ... and it shows up on the Koch whiteboard as a supply
(from Carthage).  During bidweek the traders will decide how much they
actually
want to show going to Koch, and how much will be labeled base and swing.  Mike
Landolt has been our sole Koch trader and he typically takes some Carthage gas
into Koch, but I wouldn't say a particular volume is termed-up.

2.  Other than very rarely shippling the Jennings Ranch volume over to NGPL,
we've always sold all of the Midcon Texas volumes to the affiliate ...
currently done one month at a time.  John Hymel has been the trader for these
volumes.

3.  The Entex sale @ Tomcat has always been Gas Daily because that is the way
Kerr-McGee prices the supply ... and Entex has taken all the swings.  The
January volume is 2,312/d.

David

p.s.  I still don't know my schedule for Wednesday ... everyone who is being
asked to work Transition is meeting individually with management on Wednesday
and the schedules haven't been provided yet.  As soon as I know more I'll let
you know, but I'll understand if you make other lunch arrangements.


I have entered the following names into the Performance Review System as
suggested reviewers:

Commercial Customers

Jeff Shankman
Jim Fallon
Gary Hickerson

Direct Reports

Brent Price (Business Controller -Natural Gas)
Kristin Albrecht (Business Controller - Power)
Todd Hall (Business Controller - Merchant Portfolio)

Others

Rick Causey
Ted Murphy
Fernley Dyson (London)


i am up for whatever.  let's just try to get something planned before xmas.


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Meredith Philipp/Corp/Enron on 08/17/2000
09:30 AM ---------------------------

Rosalee Fleming on 08/14/2000 10:47:18 AM
To: Meredith Philipp/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: THE ARENA DEAL IS A RIPOFF TO TAXPAYERS

---------------------- Forwarded by Rosalee Fleming/Corp/Enron on 08/14/2000
10:46 AM ---------------------------

DJS400@cs.com on 08/14/2000 09:35:46 AM
To: VIEWPOINTS@chron.com
cc: PAUL_BETTENCOURT@co.harris.tx.us, JUDGE_ECKELS@co.harris.tx.us,
HCRPGOP@AOL.COM, KENNETH.LAY@enron.com, STEVE_LETBETTER@reliantenergy.com
Subject: THE ARENA DEAL IS A RIPOFF TO TAXPAYERS

 - ARENA.doc


one was in with prebon - 572999 - it's been changed to apb

Kerri Thompson@ENRON
04/06/2001 01:24 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: apb checkout

572988, jeff r

broker shows this deal twice.

thanks


Bruce,
Donna provided to me copies of the Certificates.  They are in the name of :
PEP - PLENA ENERGIA PARTICIPACOES LTDA

Therefore, we would not be able to deposit them in an account set up for a
different entity, Enron Brazil Power Holdings XII Inc. (entity name proveded
by Bruce Harris) at the prime broker.

The account at the prime broker is actually in the name of Enron Brazil Power
Holdings XII LTD. Per Morgan, this account was set up in 10/99 but has been
marked as inactive after a year.  They can open up with the completion of a
Form W-8BEN (Withholding form).  We still have the problem with how the
shares are actually registered.  I have a call into Morgan Stanley since PEP
is owned by Enron Brazil Holdings XII to see if we have any other options.

sheila


Wes

Are we allocating people like research out to the various wholesale groups.

John


Revised


Rick, as I mentioned to you last week, I would like you to help to organise
the visit of two italian officials this summer. The first one is

- Mauro Formaggio (Director of Gas at the Italian Gas and Power Regulatory
Authority)

I have a very good relationship with him and we have helped him in the past
re. UK Gas Grid Code and other issues regarding gas TPA. He is now working on
the TPA rules applicable to the Italian gas market, and he is asking if he
could meet someone in Enron to understand more about the general operation of
a big pipeline (despatching operation, commercial scheduling of transmission,
nomination, balancing and allocation, as well as to the infomation that the
pipeline gives to the general public and to regulatory authorities). Please,
see this e-mail below. He has not yet decided the dates, but he is aiming at
last week of August, for 1/2 days.

I would suggest you could put me in touch with someone in our organisation
who could help on this, and I would co-ordinate Formaggio's meeting.

Alfredo,
I'm scheduling a visit to the USA on the practice of TPA. in the month
of August.
The aspects I'm considering are:
- how OBAs are organized and how they are applied,
- the operation of hubs,
- the balancing penalties,
- the trading of capacity
- the general operation of a (big) pipeline
- the general operation of a state pipeline, and of a LDC
- the operation of a shipper
Please let me know whether you deem it feasible also a meeting with your
american colleagues on any of these items.
---
In the meantime I have arranged for a visit to a major shipper and trader, in
Atlanta (on the access as it is seen and done by a shipper, on many pipelines
and storages), and to another major shipper and producer in Houston (on the
relationship with FERC and other regulatory authorities, as well as on the
access practice).
A visit to a major pipeline would fit well in this framework. To my opinion,
Northern would be all right. It should act as a model to what could also be
arranged, with time, by big transmission operator(s) in our country. It could
refer to the dispatching operation, and to the commercial scheduling of
transmission, to the nomination, balancing and allocation, as well as to the
infomation that the pipeline gives to the general public and to regulatory
authorities. If possible, two days would be a proper duration.
I think you can consider me a relatively well informed person, so there would
be no need of formal presentations. The opportunity to see real operations
and to discuss with experts would be all right.
In the past, when I was in Snam, I took the opportunity of keeping in touch
with the developments in the Usa. So, I already have a relatively good
general knowledge of the american system. Last time was some years ago, when
I visited Transcanada, in Calgary, for a week (focusing on nomination and
balancing). Among the pipelines I visited in the course of earlier years,
there were EL Paso, PG&E, Northwestern and also Northern for a short visit.
Going to Omaha would not be a problem for me.
As for the period, it would be in the second half of August (because with
september there would be a very heavy workload to do, here in Milano).
Thank you and best regards
Mauro

Dear Alfredo,
I'm finalizig this week the program for a visit in the USA for and updte
on TPA practice, there.
Among of meetings I'm going to arrange, it would be of interest a visit
at a major pipeline.
Northern seems to me a good example. Would you envisage it as a possible
example for me?
I would discuss the organization of dispatching, see the nomination and
balancing operation, the allocation of measurement, and other major
aspects of TPA implementation (including OBAs with interconnecting
pipelines) for transmission and storage.
I'm considering the end of August for such a visit. Owing to the extent
of the subjects, maybe two days would be appropriate.
Thank you and best regards
Mauro


[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]
[IMAGE] 	[IMAGE] 	[IMAGE]
[IMAGE] 	[IMAGE] 	[IMAGE]
[IMAGE] 	[IMAGE] 	[IMAGE]
	 	[IMAGE]


Per your request, attached is the hedge strip file that we use to calculate
your bench every night.  On one of the tabs R2, you will find your positions
and a conversion factor.  I have tied these to the benchmark groups
conversion factor numbers.  Let me know if we need some of these points
changed, i.e. CGPR-DAWN's conversion factor is 0.  Shout with any questions.
Thanks.
PL


What's happening over there?


ratelove@ev1.net
10/23/2001 02:23 PM MST
Please respond to ratelove

To: jbrewer@leathercenter.com
cc:
bcc:
Subject: Fw: Humor

----- Original Message -----
From: Beth Love
To: bl
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 7:13 PM
Subject: Humor

 Pilot Humor...
 During taxi, the crew of a US Air departure flight to Ft.Lauderdale made a
wrong turn and came nose to nose with a United 727. The irate ground
controller (a female) lashed out at the US Air crew screaming "US Air 2771,
where are you going? I told you to turn right on Charlie taxi way; you
turned right on Delta. Stop right there. I know it's difficult to tell the
difference between C's and D's but get it right". Continuing her lashing to
the embarrassed crew, she was now shouting hysterically, "God, you've
screwed everything up; it'll take forever to sort this out. You stay right
there and don't move until I tell you to. You can expect progressive taxi
instructions in about a half hour and I want you to go exactly where tell
you, when I tell you, and how I tell you. You got that, USAir 2771??"

 The humbled crew responded: "Yes Ma'am". Naturally, the ground control
frequency went terribly silent after the verbal bashing of US Air Flight
2771. No one wanted to engage the irate ground controller in her current
state. Tension in every cockpit at LGA was running high.

 Shortly after the controller finished her admonishment of the U.S. Air
crew, an unknown male pilot broke the silence and asked: "Wasn't I married
to you once?"


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 09/08/2000
06:10 PM ---------------------------

Vince J Kaminski
09/01/2000 04:35 PM
To: vkaminski@aol.com
cc:
Subject: PApers


Brad, is there a time this week when you can do a conf. call to cover these
questions?

Please advise.

Regards,

Rob

Bradley.Barta@swec.com on 02/14/2001 09:43:16 AM
To: Rob.G.Gay@enron.com
cc: susan.garven@stoneweb.com, frank.kluesener@kfw.de, Bboeh@opic.gov

Subject: Questions re: Siemens Negotiations

Rob - We've reviewed your memo which sets forth general points of your
negotiations with Siemens.  Following are comments and questions regarding
certain negotiated points:

EOT Claim Agreement

Owner must operate and maintain per O&M manuals and industry practices on oil;
if not, owner must correct items materially affecting Contractor's
commissioning
obligations

We observe that while this point places reasonable responsibility on the Owner
to correct problems that were a result of their commercial operations, it is
introduces an opportunity for the Contractor to place unfounded blame on the
owner for affecting the Contractor's ability to commission.

Risk of Loss remains with owner during commissioning on gas

We understand that the Facility is under the care, custody and control of the
Owner and that the Facility is currently operating under the insurance
coverage
intended for the commercial operating period (versus the construction period).
Please confirm that there is no reason to be concerned about insurance
coverage
if a problem arises resulting in material damage attributable to Contractor
action during commissioning on gas.  We are also advising the Lenders to have
this point reviewed by an insurance advisor.

Degradation - agree to use curves with credit to owner for degradation during
commissioning

During our last conference call it was indicated that the first choice was to
test to determine degradation and the alternative was to agree on a set of
curves.  It appears that Siemens was unwilling to agree to the test approach.
We observe that the curves used to determine owner credit may be biased to the
benefit of Siemens.  We trust that your operations experts will diligently
review the basis for the curves.

Performance LD's on gas per the EPC contract with first $4,000,000 forgiven by
owner

Please explain the rationale behind forgiving $4 million of Contractor LDs.

Delay LD's on gas do not start until 60 days after performance test on gas

During our last conference call it was indicated that there would be a stand
down until 7/1/01 when gas is available, no LDs would be paid related to oil
firing performance, and that the LD clock would start if gas commissioning is
not complete within 60 days.  We do not understand the above negotiated point.
Please confirm that our understanding is correct or clarify your negotiated
point.

TAA Agreement

No 12-month look back.

We assume that this negotiated point is related to the time period factored
into
the availability calculation for purposes of determining whether or not an
extension or additional work by the Contractor has been triggered as a result
of
dropping below the availability standards.  Please explain how this negotiated
point affects the mechanics of the TAA and also please explain how
availability
will be calculated.  As we noted during our last conference call, we are
concerned that Siemens believes that the availability value is not reduced if
maintenance work is being performed during periods when the Facility is not
being dispatched.

12 month Initial Guarantee Period, with the clock suspended for gas
commissioning unless owner delay.

We interpret the above negotiated point to mean that the 12-month clock for
the
initial guarantee period stops during commissioning regardless of how long it
takes the Contractor to commission on gas (unless delays are attributable to
Owner) and re-starts after Contractor has successfully completed the
performance
testing on gas.  Please confirm that our understanding is correct.

In order to provide the lenders an adequate warranty period on gas (if
there are additional delays on the P/L) our Insurance group has  indicated
that we will have no problem obtaining 12 months renewable business
interruption insurance when we go operational on gas.  This should solve
the issue over the revised warranty with Siemens because it covers defects,
design, and workmanship on the turbines and includes lost profits, etc.
Incidentally, for insurance purposes the turbines are designated DE3 which
is not a new technology designation.   The duration of BI coverage is 18
months per event with US$150,000 deductible.

Stone & Webster is advising the Lenders to have an insurance advisor review
this
point.

Thanks in advance for your response.  Hope all is well.

Regards,

Bradley


FYI - Please see attached information from Kate Cole.

Deb Korkmas
Enron North America Corp.
ENA Legal Dept.
1400 Smith Street, Room 3819
Houston, TX  77002
Phone:  713-853-5448
Fax:  713-646-3393
----- Forwarded by Deb Korkmas/HOU/ECT on 10/13/2000 09:27 AM -----

	Kate Cole@ENRON
	10/13/2000 09:05 AM

		 To: Melanie Curran/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Sue Kelly/LON/ECT@ECT, Robin Hill/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Deb Korkmas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary
Ogden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lori Pinder/HOU/EES@EES, Annette Patrick/LON/ECT@ECT,
Bonnie_Rushing@pgn.com, Ed B Hearn III/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julie
Delahay/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Barbara Hankins/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Lorna
Jones/LON/ECT@ECT, Michael Slade/LON/ECT@ECT, David Bateman/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Hardie Davis/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Teresa Callahan/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Huntlaw Corporate Services Limited -  COMPLIANCE PROCEDURES FOR
CAYMAN ISLANDS COMPANIES

I'm attaching a memorandum from Hunter & Hunter, our Cayman Islands counsel,
regarding recent changes in Cayman Islands laws and regulations.  Please
forward it to other interested parties in your departments.

One immediate consequence of these changes is the request by counsel that we
provide them with more detail on the intended business activities of our new
subsidiaries in the A&J memos that are sent to them.  Without being
impractical, something more than "Oil & Gas exploration in Mexico" (by way of
example) is requested.  If it is impossible to provide more meaningful detail
without going on extensively, then the current practice will have to continue
to be acceptable.  However, a business purpose of "holding company" is
probably not going to be acceptable.

If you have specific questions or concerns after reviewing the memorandum, I
suggest that you contact Rory Todd or another representative of Hunter &
Hunter (phone:  345-949-4900; fax:  345-949-5175; email rtodd@huntlaw.com.ky).

Thanks guys!  Kate

Kate B. Cole
Director, Corporate Services
Enron Corp.
Tel: (713) 853-1624
FAX: (713) 646-8007
Email: kate.cole@enron.com


This is a "high volume" trading counterparty.  Shouldn't we negotiate an ISDA
to replace the existing master?  SS


Regarding the Brand Conference in San Francisco Aug. 13 -15,  here is the
flight information for Steve Kean and his wife, Melissa.

You had asked for this in case Cindy wants to travel at the same time.

Sunday, August 13    IAH   San Francisco

Continental # 1857    9:22 a.m.  11:18 a.m.

Tuesday, August 15    San Francisco IAH

Continental # 1651    3:00 p.m.  8:53 p.m.

Let me know if you need anything else.


Welcome to eMail News Delivery, a service from Business Wire.
Here is your Industrial Information Resources Inc. news release.
If you have received this in error please send a message to:
eMailDelivery@businesswire.com
with the following command in the body of the message:
 unsubscribe TX-INDUSTRIAL-INFO-RES
If you have questions about this service, please contact your
Business Wire Account Executive or service@businesswire.com

BW2004  JAN 30,2002       2:00 PACIFIC      05:00 EASTERN

( BW)(TX-INDUSTRIAL-INFO-RES) Quebec Emerges As Key Location for New
Pharmaceutical and Biotech Plants, in an Advisory by
Industrialinfo.com

    Business Editors & Health/Medical Writers

	   HOUSTON--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Jan. 30, 2002--Researched by
Industrialinfo.com (Industrial Information Resources, Inc.; Houston,
Texas). The Canadian province of Quebec is successfully courting new
capital investment from pharmaceutical and biotech companies
worldwide. In the past year, over $300 million in new capital projects
were announced. Quebec is not only seeking established international
companies; they are also "hatching" them on a regular basis from their
strong Biotech City, located in Laval, Quebec. Biotech City is already
home to about 30 biotechnology, biopharmaceutical and information
technology companies and research centers. INRS-Institut Armand
Frappier, the host of Biotech City, is spending over $100 million to
add new R&D laboratory space and upgrade existing facilities.
	   Offering a host of attractions, including lucrative government
incentives and a strong intellectual property base at the
universities, Quebec is emerging as a major player in both research
and development and the manufacturing of pharmaceuticals and biotech
products. Gone are the hints of outsiders being shunned for not being
French. Clever marketing efforts now promote that deep European flavor
coupled with a desirable North American location. Those efforts are
paying off.
	   The roster of companies investing in new or expanded facilities is
growing every year. Industrial Information Resources (IIR) is tracking
these companies. Merck Frosst Canada & Company (Kirkland, Quebec) is
in the midst of a $250 million expansion and modernization program at
their Kirkland, Quebec site. Pharmascience Incorporated (Montreal,
Quebec) recently completed a $50 million expansion at their Montreal
facility. Quebec is also under serious consideration by two
international pharmaceutical companies for new plant investment at a
combined cost of almost $1 billion.
	   IIR tracks project spending trends in the Pharmaceutical-Biotech
industry and has recently released the 2002 US Pharmaceutical-Biotech
Industry Forecast
(http://www.industrialinfo.com/2002pharmforecast.htm)
	   Industrialinfo.com provides daily news related to the industrial
market place including industry alerts and databases for the energy
and industrial markets. For more information on trends and upcoming
construction activities in the Pharmaceutical-Biotech markets as well
as other industrial sectors send inquiries to
pharmabiotech@industrialinfo.com or visit us at
www.industrialinfo.com.

    --30--MJB/ho*

    CONTACT: Industrial Information Resources, Houston
             Annette Kreuger, 713/783-5147

    KEYWORD: TEXAS INTERNATIONAL CANADA
    INDUSTRY KEYWORD: BIOTECHNOLOGY MEDICAL PHARMACEUTICAL
    SOURCE: Industrial Information Resources

For the best viewing of the news releases please
 use the following email settings:  Courier 10 point.
 -Notice of Copyright and General Disclaimer-
 (c) 2000 Business Wire. All of the releases provided by Business Wire
 are protected by copyright and other applicable laws, treaties and
 conventions. Information contained in the releases is furnished by
 Business Wire`s members who are solely responsible for their content,
 accuracy and originality. All reproduction, other than for an
 individual user`s reference, is prohibited without prior written
 permission.

- Notice of Copyright and General Disclaimer --
(c) 1999 Business Wire. All of the releases provided by Business Wire
are protected by copyright and other applicable laws, treaties and
conventions. Information contained in the releases is furnished by
Business Wire`s members who are solely responsible for their content,
accuracy and originality. All reproduction, other than for an
individual user`s reference, is prohibited without prior written
permission.
- Notice of Copyright and General Disclaimer --
(c) 1999 Business Wire. All of the releases provided by Business Wire
are protected by copyright and other applicable laws, treaties and
conventions. Information contained in the releases is furnished by
Business Wire`s members who are solely responsible for their content,
accuracy and originality. All reproduction, other than for an
individual user`s reference, is prohibited without prior written
permission.


Hi ,

In this competitive market most companies need to be able to access mission critical information from their desktops without having to call or dial-up  into the corporate intranets.  Islands of data are usually created when the  majority of sales and administrative staff are working in various locations.Thus there is a need for operational framework integrating human resources,marketing, legal services and various other divisions. We at Izhuta can help you integrate your corporate intranet infrastructure at half the costand twice the speed.

Izhuta Solutions will provide your company  with a total solution.  Our services include:

. Custom Application Development
. Full Application Development and Maintenance Services
. Full application Re-engineering Services
. Application Migration and Porting Services
. Network and Systems Management
. 24x7 Application Support Services
. Technical Expertise (C++,  Java, XML, Wireless, embedded and many more)
. Fully Staffed Development Centers as Joint Ventures (50% ownership - 50 to 200 Offsite Development Staff)

The following is a case study of a corporate intranet infrastructure which we developed.

http://www.izhuta.com/techyuga.NETcasestudy.htm

To experience our efficiency and deliverability, please visit http://www.Izhuta.com/FreeProposal.asp  to test drive our services for FREE

Please let me know of a convenient time to contact you and schedule a more in-depth conversation about our intranet solutions.

Regards,

Vege
Izhuta
ph:800-485-7004 ex 205
fax: 888-467-1864
email:vege@Izhuta.com
web:www.Izhuta.com


?
----- Original Message -----
From: cmarsters
To: BUD  ROBINSON ; Danny JR  Richardson ; Pam  Day ; Deniese Day ; Richard &
Marty Darr ; Billy Bass Daniel  ; Larry W. Bass
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2000 4:55 AM
Subject: Fw: More funnies from Florida

?
----- Original Message -----
From: Frank  Marsters
To: Mathews, Russ ; Marsters,  Lindsay ; Marsters, Linda ; Marsters,
Christine ; Marsters James ; Day, Pam ; Ferguson, Mike ;  Adams,  George
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2000 11:40 AM
Subject: Fw: More funnies from Florida

?
----- Original Message -----
From: Mary  Sue
To: Trina Osborne ; t  osborne ; Michael L. Lance ; LISA CURRY ; JoAnn Harris
; Janette  Burch ; GEORGE G.J. DURHAM ; Frank  Marsters ; Cynthia Hughes ;
Becky  Harris
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2000 9:30 AM
Subject: Fw: More funnies from Florida

?
----- Original Message -----
From: Jonnie  Steffek
To: Alicia Jimerson Knox ; Becky Barrier ; Betty S Fleming ; Betty Walden ;
Bill Booher ; Bob Gartner ; Bob Hux ; Bonnie G  Sabrsula ; Brady  Carruth ;
Butch  Robinson ; C. A.  & Glenda Leggett ; Carrie & Brad Gimmestad ; Cheryl
R Nelson ;  Christi &  John Elledge ; Cookie  Gartner ; Cynthia Russ ; Dave
and Janet Foshee ; Doug Doyle ; Ed Schulz ; Edwina Woolsey ; Greg Schroder ;
Hap Hunnicutt ; Howard Cordell  ; James Blair ;  Janelle R Melton  ; Janis
Schulz  ; Jerry Hickman  ; John Cook ;  John Hutchison  ; John Smelley ;
Karen Inmon  ; Kemah Blair ;  Kim  Saxon ; Laura Kent ; Louise Smith  ; Lucky
 Long ; Marilyn Wells ; maryann.talley@ey.com ; Mary  Harris ; Mike A  Hunt ;
Pamela Yoko ; Patricia Freitag ; R C Inmon ; Ray Hinsley ; Reed and Laura
Eichelberger ; Richard.Buddeke@concert.com ; Sandy McCarty ; Sue Shaw ; Susan
Allen ; Susan Smith ; Terry Russ ; tmoffett@Jahoinc.com ; Truman C  Edminster
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2000 12:36 AM
Subject: More funnies from Florida

?
 - fduh[1].gif


FYI.

Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 02/25/2001 03:33 PM -----

	Tom Riley/Western Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange
	Sent by: Michele Curtis/Western Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange
	02/23/2001 08:12 PM

		 To: Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES,
Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Gahn/HOU/EES@EES, Dennis
Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Eric Melvin/HOU/EES@EES, Maureen Palmer/HOU/EES@EES,
Wanda Curry/HOU/EES@EES, wanda.curry/HOU/EES@EES, Evan Hughes/HOU/EES@EES,
msmith7043@houton.rr.com@SMTP@Exchange, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Tom
Riley/Western Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange
		 cc:
		 Subject: UC/CSU

Attorney/Client Privileged Information

Summary of our follow-on discussion with UC/CSU Friday afternoon (Tom/Dennis
from Enron):
1.  UC/CSU's goal is to reach agreement on the interim solution by the end of
next week (Friday, 3/2)
2.  UC/CSU would like draft language memorializing the structure contemplated
below by COB Monday, 2/26, and asked what our proposed form of agreement
would be (letter agreement, amendment).  Their preference is the first and
expressed concern that if the draft had too many legal terms and/or was too
one-sided, that it would be unrealistic to expect approval by Friday.  I have
since spoken to Mike and I will propose to UC/CSU that we get them a term
sheet on Monday for discussion, with the intent of wrapping the terms into a
letter agreement of a couple pages.
3.  UC/CSU is considering underwriting the risk they would be absorbing
through the interim agreement.
4.  It is both our expectations that during the interim period we would gain
some clarity on the legislative/regulatory landscape such that we could begin
working on a long-term solution.
5.  If we don't reach a long-term solution, we would flip back to the terms
of the existing contract, and are back to the existing issues.
6.  We reinforced the highly confidential nature of these discussions.
Commercial terms
? Intent is to offer an intermediate solution to mediate UC/CSU's concern of
potential long-term consequences (loss of direct access rights preventing
them from gaining financial benefits) due to status as a bundled utility
customer.  Want time for landscape to solidify so we can agree on a long term
solution that would retain them as a direct access customer or a synthetic
version of that (i.e., they still receive the benefits).
? Enron would re-DASR accounts, assuming the following:
? UC/CSU assume liabilities from February 1, 2001 through end of term of
interim agreement, resulting from that action.
? Term to be 90 days, with the option to extend upon the mutual agreement of
both parties.
? Calculation methodology of the liability:  Spot market price minus the
prevailing bundled utility rate plus load shaping costs (Dennis - please
provide the methodology.  Also, what about A/R risk, treatment of
surcharges?).
? Exposure is calculated ex-post (i.e., we will not agree to an amount,
capped or fixed, at the outset).  They want an estimation of the potential
exposure, so we need to make sure we have proper protection that does not
bind us to that estimation. (Alternatively, we can provide them this
estimation outside the agreement, with the same caveats).
? Agree during interim period to work together (good faith effort) to
mitigate the exposure of the liability.
? UC/CSU assumes risk that should we be barred from re-de-DASRing at the end
of the term (due to legislative, regulatory or other actions or
circumstances), UC/CSU would assume this exposure as well.  They countered
with a suggestion for our consideration that such an occurrence be treated as
a force majure event with the affect of terminating the contract.  (This
seems counter-intuitive to me to their desire to remain a direct access
customer - see concern below).
? This was not discussed, but term should include a provision for
confidentiality.
Concern:
It is somewhat disconcerting they have asked for and are considering this
proposal.  They are absorbing our risk, which we shared to be a very large
number ($100M+ over the remaining contract term).  They also did not want to
discuss their regulatory concerns, and enter into a discussion with Dasovich
regarding these.  These points lead me to believe that perhaps they know
something we don't.  Just a consideration for our call Saturday.
Tom

From: Tom Riley/Western Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange@Exchange on
02/23/2001 03:56 PM
To: Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES,
Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Gahn/HOU/EES@EES, Eric Melvin/HOU/EES@EES,
Maureen Palmer/HOU/EES@EES, Wanda Curry/HOU/EES@EES, Evan Hughes/HOU/EES@EES,
Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Don Black/HOU/EES@EES, Neil Bresnan/HOU/EES@EES
Subject:

We had a cordial and outside the box discussion with UC/CSU today.

On the call, UC/CSU expressed a concern that in light of the uncertain and
rapidly evolving regulatory and legislative landscape, they do not feel it to
be prudent for them to consider our long-term proposed solutions.  They were
intrigued by our offers and we will take them up at a later date.  In the
meantime, they are proposing we price a short term deal.  This will buy them
re-DASR status until the end of the current uncertain situation.

Proposed Structure:

Enron to temporarily Re-DASR UC/CSU accounts.  UC/CSU liable for any
additional costs incurred by Enron as a result of that action.  Such costs
may include, but not be limited to the following: account receivable risks,
difference between spot market price and utility bundled rate, exposure to
changes in calculation of PX credit applicable to direct access providers (as
compared to spot market purchase price), load shaping costs to follow
customer hourly load without availability of the PX.

Assumptions:

? Enron has sole option to return accounts to De-DASR status at end of term.
? UC/CSU assumes risk should this action be blocked by law, regulation, or
3rd party action.
? Enron retains right in contract to choose source of electricity supply for
duration of existing contract term.
? Enron will work with UC/CSU to mitigate liability exposure (i.e., consider
entering into purchase agreement with utilities, etc.).

Potential liability during term (notional):  $_____ (60 day term);   $____(90
day term)

Potential liability at end of term if Enron is unable to return accounts to
utility supply status at end of term due to potential legislative,
regulatory, or other action or circumstance (notional):   $_____ (assuming 60
day term);   $____(assuming 90 day term)

It is envisioned that during this short term period that the regulatory and
legislative landscape will become clearer, allowing both parties to better
understand their exposure through the term of the contract and beyond.  Once
this clarity is achieved, it is agreed both parties will meet to discuss long
term solutions meeting the needs of both parties.

Please comment with concerns, ideas immediately as we will be back on the
phone with them shortly.

Thank you.

Tom


These have both been changed - trader error.

Thanks,
Kate

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
11/21/2000 02:02 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: 11-21-00 discrepancies

deal 464181
Diana Scholtes
Prebon shows Cob......we show Mid-C

deal 464182
Dianna Scholtes
Prebon shows Cob.....we show Mid-C