ISO Market Participants:

	As you know, on June 19, the FERC released its "Order On Rehearing
Of Monitoring And Mitigation Plan For The California Wholesale Electric
Markets, Establishing West-Wide Mitigation, And Establishing Settlement
Conference." Since the Order was released, market participants have raised
several questions regarding the Order. The ISO has received several
questions and plans to share those questions and answers with you within the
next few days.

	In addition, in compliance with the June 19 FERC Order, the ISO has
made its compliance filing with FERC. The filing is posted on the ISO web
site at http://www1.caiso.com/pubinfo/FERC/filings/ for your review.

	The ISO will host a conference call from 12:00 p.m. to 2:00 p.m. PDT
on Monday, July 16 to discuss questions you may have regarding the FERC's
June 19 Order. The details of the call are as follows:

	Dial-In Number: (877)381-6005

	Conference ID: 1361763

	Leader: Byron Woertz

	Our goal will be to clarify the ways in which the ISO is
interpreting and implementing the FERC Order and to address other
implementation issues you may have. We do not plan to discuss issues that
are pending or are more appropriately addressed at FERC. If you have
specific questions you would like for us to address, please send them to me
by COB on Thursday, July 12 so that we can be better prepared to address
them during the call on Monday. If you have any questions, please call or
e-mail me.

	Byron B. Woertz, Jr.

	Director, Client Relations

	(916) 608-7066

	(800) 481-7037 - Pager


We sold 870/day starting 5/2 - 5/31 to CES for Timet.  The deal number is
257878 and the price is $3.4884 ($3.39 + $.0984).


Car Rental Options for Enron Travelers

Rental car contracts for 2001 have been awarded to:

National Car Rental (Primary) and  Alamo Rent-A-Car (Secondary).

The intent of these agreements is to consolidate and leverage Enron's total
car rental spend to achieve the most favorable rates and non-pricing
provisions (i.e. insurance).

National Car Rental, due to its service levels, availability and total value
proposition, has been awarded Primary status and is recommended as the first
choice for Enron travelers' needs.

Alamo Rent-A-Car, a sister company to National, has been awarded a contract
reflecting a Secondary status, due to its service levels, availability and
low cost solutions.  Alamo is recommended as an alternative to National,
where available.

When you rent a vehicle in the United States, (including Puerto Rico) or
Canada, the following insurance provisions are included, regardless of rate
selected:
1. L/DW (Loss/Damage Waiver) - This is what is called Comprehensive or
Collision on your personal auto. It covers the rental vehicle and pays for
any damage to it.
2. Liability - This covers people and property outside the rental vehicle.
For both National and Alamo, the coverage is $100,000 per person, $300,000
per occurrence and $50,000 for property damage.
** IMPORTANT ***
These coverages apply regardless of rate selected, as long as the following
contract ID is communicated at the time of reservation and rental is recorded
on the transaction rental agreement.  (National -  5000838 Alamo    - #143974)

To enjoy the highest levels of service while renting a vehicle from Enron's
preferred suppliers, it is recommended that each traveler enroll in
National's and Alamo's preferred traveler programs.  National's Emerald Club
membership and Alamo's Quicksilver program are designed to speed the
transaction time by providing services such as counter bypass and rapid
return.  The enrollment fees for these programs have been waived for Enron
travelers.  Enrollment packets will be mailed to the addresses of Enron
American Express T&E Cardholders.  You may also find an enrollment form on
the Enron Travel Program intranet @ gss.enron.com <http://gss.enron.com/>.

If you have any questions or comments, please contact Jeff Leath at
713-646-6165.


Happy New Year.  We hope your holidays were enjoyable and restful.  For a pleasant start to 2002, please join your Enron colleagues for coffee and donuts this Friday, January 11, from 8:00 - 9:00 a.m. in the lobby of the Enron Building.  We look forward to seeing you there.


Steve--I am at 925-600-2085, and Jim Macias is at 925-600-2306. Thanks.


I would do that.  I tried calling but got your voicemail.  Try me at 713 853
3230

"Lengkeek Jr, Steve C" <Steve.C.LengkeekJr@conectiv.com> on 02/15/2001
08:26:54 AM
To: "'john.arnold@enron.com'" <john.arnold@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Swaps for EFPS

I am long 800 futures short swaps any interest.

Steven Lengkeek
Conectiv
302-452-6930


Make a Reservation      Weekend Events    National Basketball Association     Rockets vs. Suns in Phoenix, 11/4 Knicks vs. Bulls in Chicago, 11/3 Kings vs. Nuggets in Denver, 11/3 Spurs vs. Trail Blazers in Portland, 11/3 Spurs vs. Kings in Sacramento, 11/4 Jazz vs. Lakers in Los Angeles, 11/4 Jazz vs. Supersonics in Seattle, 11/3    National Football League     Broncos vs. Raiders in Oakland, 11/5 Chiefs vs. Chargers in San Diego, 11/4 Seahawks vs. Redskins in Washington, 11/4   College Football     Arizona vs. California in Berkeley, 11/3 New Mexico vs. San Diego State in San Diego, 11/3 SMU vs. Nevada in Reno, 11/3   National Hockey League    Thrashers vs. Mighty Ducks in Anaheim, 11/4 Thrashers vs. Kings in San Jose, 11/3 Canucks vs. Sharks in San Jose, 11/3      Weekend Surf'n Go Sports Fares   Support your favorite team on the road this weekend with Surf'n Go Sports, a new feature at America West. Check to see if there is a great fare between your city and that of your team's rival and go see the big game.  Event   Departure City Destination City Fares Arizona vs. California    Tucson, AZ Oakland, CA $98  Arizona vs. California    Tucson, AZ San Francisco, CA $98  Arizona vs. California    Tucson, AZ San Jose, CA $98  Broncos vs. Raiders    Denver, CO Oakland, CA $198  Broncos vs. Raiders    Denver, CO San Francisco, CA $198  Broncos vs. Raiders    Denver, CO San Jose, CA $198  Canucks vs. Sharks    Vancouver, Canada Oakland, CA $188*  Canucks vs. Sharks    Vancouver, Canada San Francisco, CA $188*  Canucks vs. Sharks    Vancouver, Canada San Jose, CA $188*  Chiefs vs. Chargers    Kansas City, MO Carlsbad, CA $158  Chiefs vs. Chargers    Kansas City, MO San Diego, CA $158  Jazz vs. Lakers    Salt Lake City, UT Burbank, CA $118  Jazz vs. Lakers    Salt Lake City, UT Los Angeles, CA $118  Jazz vs. Lakers    Salt Lake City, UT Ontario, CA $118  Jazz vs. Supersonics    Salt Lake City, UT Seattle, WA $148  Kings vs. Nuggets    Sacramento, CA Denver, CO $178  Knicks vs. Bulls    New York, NY Chicago, IL $118  Knicks vs. Bulls    Newark, NJ Chicago, IL $118  New Mexico vs. San Diego State    Albuquerque, NM Carlsbad, CA $98  New Mexico vs. San Diego State    Albuquerque, NM San Diego, CA $98  Rockets vs. Suns    Houston, TX Phoenix, AZ $148  Seahawks vs. Redskins    Seattle, WA Baltimore/Washington $198  SMU vs. Nevada    Dallas, TX Reno, NV $168  Spurs vs. Trail Blazers    San Antonio, TX Portland, OR $148  Spurs vs. Kings    San Antonio, TX Sacramento, CA $148  Thrashers vs. Kings    Atlanta, GA Burbank, CA $188  Thrashers vs. Kings    Atlanta, GA Long Beach, CA $188  Thrashers vs. Kings    Atlanta, GA Ontario, CA $188  Thrashers vs. Kings    Atlanta, GA Los Angeles, CA $188  Thrashers vs. Mighty Ducks    Atlanta, GA Long Beach, CA $188  Thrashers vs. Mighty Ducks    Atlanta, GA Orange/Santa Ana, CA $188  * $188USD based on $290CAD   Surf'n Go Sports Terms and Conditions: Purchase Ticket By:  Friday, 11/2/01, 9:00pm PDT Travel Outbound:  Saturday, 11/3/01  Travel Return:  Monday, 11/5/01 or Tuesday, 11/6/01 Travel On:  Flights operated by America West and America West Express Purchased Through:  americawest.com Ticket Refundability:  Non- refundable Itinerary Changes: Subject to fare availability, $100 change fee, and difference in fare if applicable Minimum Stay:  2 nights  Black Out Dates:  None Routing:  Roundtrip only, Routing restrictions may apply Other Discounts:  Not combinable with any other discount Seat Inventory:  Limited -  subject to availability Federal Excise Tax:  $2.75 per flight segment. A flight segment is defined as a take off and landing Passenger Facility Charges:  Up to $20 per person, depending on itinerary           You have received this message because you subscribed to the Surf'n Go messaging service at americawest.com.  To unsubscribe to this weekly mailing, please visit http://www.americawest.com/specials/sp_subscribe.asp .


Per Steve Kean, attached please find a filing at FERC that includes an
appendix identifying market abuses.

Please let me know if you experience any difficulties with the file.

Regards,
Elizabeth Linnell


heard a rumor that EIX may file for bankruptcy on wednesday.

----Original Message-----
   >From:      "Benjamin Bergfelt" <ben.bergfelt@painewebber.com>
   >To:          "'gregwhalley@yahoo.com'"
<gregwhalley@yahoo.com>,"'greg.whalley@Enron.com'" <greg.whalley@enron.com>
   >Cc:
   >Bcc:
   >Subj:      power companies
   >Sent:     Monday, December 11, 2000 5:47 PM
   >
   >Greg, Fitch is reducing credit ratings on the CA utilities, EIX and PCG,
Moody's is considering it. The news wire said PG&E(PCG) is going to be at 6
Billion by the end of December in the whole. More should be available in the
AM. Ben


Don't know- Does anyone know?

From: James D Steffes on 11/22/2000 07:43 AM
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: Report of Editorial Board Meeting with the San Diego
Union-Tribune

Do you think that there is a deal in the works and we are "out in the rain"?
I have to doubt that DENA or Southern are willing to give $ back to
California.  Maybe Reliant would.

Jim

	Richard Shapiro
	11/22/2000 07:37 AM

		 To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Report of Editorial Board Meeting with the San Diego Union-Tribune

FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron on 11/22/2000
07:36 AM ---------------------------

"Lynne Church" <LCHURCH@epsa.org> on 11/21/2000 05:21:23 PM
To: <joer@calpine.com>, <jmdonnell@duke-energy.com>,
<wfhall@duke-energy.com>, <KERA@dynegy.com>, <jhartso@enron.com>,
<Richard.Shapiro@enron.com>, <smutny@iepa.com>,
<craig.mataczynski@nrgenergy.com>, <Kent_Burton@Ogden-Energy.com>,
<john_h_stout@reliantenergy.com>, <cslesser@seiworldwide.com>,
<jtmiller@thermoecotek.com>, <Tim.Thuston@williams.com>, <gackerman@wptf.org>
cc: "Gene Peters" <GPETERS@epsa.org>, "Julie Simon" <JSIMON@epsa.org>, "Mark
Stultz" <MSTULTZ@epsa.org>

Subject: Report of Editorial Board Meeting with the San Diego Union-Tribune

IEP's public affairs consultant arranged an editorial board meeting for me
while I was in town for the NARUC meeting.  Present were Don Sevrens, news
editor/insight section; Bill Osborne, senior editor/opinion; Jim Gogek,
editorial writer; Bernie Jones, editor, opinion pages; Craig Rose, the
reporter who has written extensively on the topic, and a photographer.

My two primary messages were that (1) wholesale and retail competition is
working elsewhere, particularly in Pennsylvania, and can eventually work in
California if the rules are changed, and (2) California has a severe supply
shortage and needs to focus on providing incentives for new generation and
expediting the permitting process.  I was subtly trying to get across the
message that leadership was needed to help Californians deal with the need to
reconcile their environmental and land use goals with the need to bring their
power supply and demand into balance.  I, of course, defended FERC's order on
the causes of the price volatility in California this summer and their lack
of any authority to order retroactive refunds.  I also pointed out that there
were no findings of individual market abuse, so that refunds wouldn't be
warranted even if there was legal authority.  I also pointed out the problems
with price caps.

Other than Craig Rose, who disagreed with me any chance he got, the others
asked good questions and seemed to be listening.  They made the point
repeatedly that this matter is very political, suggesting that a political
compromise with the generators/marketers is necessary.  One of them said he
had heard there was a deal with the generators being negotiated and asked me
my position.  I responded that I had no response.  Anything like that is the
business of individual members.

They indicated that they expected to do a story for this coming Sunday's
Insight Section.  Please give me any feedback you have.

cc:  Stu Ryan, AES by fax
       Jim Macias, Calpine, by fax


Dear Mr. Kaminski:

Thank you for your phone messages, confirming that you and Mr. Bill Bradford
will be meeting with Mr. Robert Rudy (Managing Director - Head of Client
Service) this Monday, March 20th, from 9 a.m. - 12 p.m.  We are looking
forward to seeing you, and hopefully we'll even have some sunny weather for
you.

Attached are the directions to our office.  Please be sure to note that our
dress code is business casual, so please do not feel obligated to wear a
suit and tie.

 <<Directions to KMV.doc>>

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Sincerely,

Kristina J. Wun
Marketing Coordinator
KMV LLC
1620 Montgomery Street, Suite 140
San Francisco, California  94111
415-765-5988 (direct line)
415-296-9669 (general line)
415-296-9458 (fax line)
wun@kmv.com

 - Directions to KMV.doc


Everything About Enron's Insurance Programs

That You Were Afraid To Ask

(or Didn't  Know to Ask)

Presented by
David Marshall
Enron Corporate Risk Management

Thursday, January 11, 2001
11:30 - 1:00

The Houston Room
601 Jefferson
(We've reserved the Enron Shuttle to transport the "non-walkers")

Lunch will be served.  Please RSVP to Pat Radford at 39282.

One of the goals of Jeff Hodge and Barbara Gray is to increase the level of
departmental information sharing activities.  Since we are faced on a daily
basis with insurance matters in contract drafting and client advising, the
East/Upstream Origination and Trading Group felt it would be productive to
have Enron's Corporate Risk Management Group give a presentation on current
Enron Insurance Programs, policies and contractual risk allocation
preferences.  It then occured to us that this subject might be of interest to
all of the lawyers on the 38th floor.   Please join us next Thursday.

Sorry for the inconvenient location.  We'll make it worth your while with the
quality of the food and the presentation.


The report named: West VaR <http://trv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=36&report_name=West+VaR&category_cd=2&category_name=WEST&toc_hide=1&sTV1=2&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=11/26/2001>, published as of 11/26/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


NewEnergy, Inc. has changed its name to AES NewEnergy, Inc.  This is a name
overlay in GCP.


Here is the latest numbers for the project models.  I am still working on
getting the property taxes for Gleason.  Give me a call if you have any
questions.

Ben


FYI per my longer e:mail update message...
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 03/09/2001 07:17 PM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Sally Beck                           03/09/2001 05:20 PM

To: Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Gordon Heaney's Acceptance

FYI - Beth Apollo led the doorstep review in Monterrey last week.  No
problems discovered - but Beth did find some communications and system access
issues that could be improved to make it easier for Max's team to do their
jobs.  She has quickly identified a point person within Operations in Houston
who is bi-lingual (Gordon).  Max's note addresses his pleasure over Beth's
responsiveness and the doorstep process in general.  Just wanted to pass this
along.  --Sally
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 03/09/2001 05:15 PM
---------------------------

Max Yzaguirre@ENRON
03/09/2001 04:37 PM
To: Beth Apollo/Enron@EnronXGate
cc: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Gordon Heaney's Acceptance

Beth:

Thanks for the note regarding Gordon.  I appreciate the quick turnaround time
on it, and I agree that he should be a helpful addition to the team.

Put me down as a fan of the doorstop review process.

Best regards - Max


Give me a call.  These look fine I just have a few questions.


-----Original Message-----
From:  Lundstrom, Bruce
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 1:14 PM
To: Derrick Jr., James; Haedicke, Mark E.; Walls Jr., Rob
Cc: Rogers, Rex
Subject: Dabhol -- A Brief Legal Update

Gentlemen -

A few updates:

The second Bombay High Court hearing was held today.  The court asked DPC to
go away for a week and try to continue discussions with MSEB.  The parties
are to return to the court in a week for another hearing.  We are not
entirely sure why the court made this request -- it has nothing to do with
the MERC jurisdiction issue before the court.  One possible positive
interpretation:  The court feels the need to generate some positive publicity
("I tried to encourage a positive outcome") before ruling in our favor on the
jurisdiction issue.  But, again, the court's motives are not clear.

We still don't know if some or all of the lenders will try to cure the
construction contract defaults this week.  I would expect that we would
receive formal termination letters over the weekend from the contractors if
the contractors are not paid in full this week.

Some of you are aware that DPC's relationship with its Indian outside counsel
has recently shown some strain.  That strain did not affect the quality of
DPC's representation at the Bombay High Court hearing.  However, I'm also
pretty sure that the strain has not been permanently "fixed" and that further
efforts will be required in this regard.  Gail Brownfeld and Jim McCartney
are helping DPC with these issues.

Bruce


---------------------- Forwarded by Don Miller/HOU/ECT on 09/15/2000 09:26 PM
---------------------------

Don Miller
09/15/2000 09:26 PM
To: jhougla@entergy.com, Aldo_portales@fpl.com, Randy_hoyle@fpl.com
cc:
Subject: Enron Due Dili lists

Although it is a bit late, I think it still qualifies as Friday.

Attached are the due diligence lists for all the projects.  I will be in on
Saturday if you have any questions.

Regards,

Don
713-853-0492


My comments are marked on the attached.

	Andrew Wilson@ENRON
	11/07/2000 02:40 PM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Steel Financial Swap Term Sheet Question

Tom,
I have talked with Rodney Malcolm and several originators and they need two
financial swap term sheets, one for Enron paying fixed and one for Enron
paying floating. To this end, I have revised our generic document and created
two new documents. Could you review each of these, and if they meet with your
approval, please forward them back to me. Thanks.
--Andrew


Its  M & M  time.   Hope baby is better!!!

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Mark,

This is a draft of the CEG/CEG-RIO legal risk memo.  I wanted you to have an
early look.  If it undergoes any changes, I will let you know.  Call me if
you have questions.

Regards,
Randy

******************************************************************************
This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information and is
only intended for the persons and entities to which it is addressed.  If any
party receiving this message is not the intended recipient or an authorized
representative thereof, the receiving party is hereby notified that the
review, dissemination or copying of this message, any attachment thereto, or
information contained therein, is prohibited.  If this message is received in
error, please notify the sender immediately by return email and delete this
email and all attachments from your system.
******************************************************************************


I don't know any of these people.  We should probably see if any of the EES
business people know them.  Also, we need to find out if people we know know
them.  For example, why hasn't Peevey been a strong advocate for open
access?  Jeff, do you know? And Sandi, you know all these Dems very well --
any other ideeas?

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854

	Karen Denne
	04/03/2001 07:12 AM

		 To: Janel Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, bhansen@lhom.com,
hgovenar@govadv.com, sgovenar@govadv.com, Ksmith@kdscommunications.com, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Another List

Attached is the list compiled by Marathon of "influentials" in each of our
priority legislative districts (this week, we're only focusing on Burton,
Bowen, Hertzberg, Keeley and Cox).  Please review the list and let me know
ASAP if you know anyone on the list and would be willing to make calls.
Thanks. kd

 - List of targeted legislators April 2 2001.xls


Monica,

Please add Bilal Bajwa to your distribution list.

Thanks,
Robin


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 04/26/2001
03:45 PM ---------------------------

"Carlos Giron" <Carlos.Giron@psiusa.com> on 04/23/2001 01:48:45 PM
To: Darron.C.Giron@enron.com, Angela.teerwilliams@gte.net, Glenn@home.com,
Ralphmayers@hotmail.com, Yhaynes@mindspring.com, Mike.Kotar@psiusa.com,
ronniegiron@yahoo.com
cc:
Subject: Fwd: snake

Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 13:45:14 -0500
From: "Bishop Keller" <BKeller@psiusa.com>
To: Carlos.Giron@psiusa.com
Subject:  snake
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="SNAKE.doc"
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="SNAKE.doc"

 - SNAKE.doc


Bob,

Please, go ahead and register.

Vince

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lee, Bob
Sent:	Monday, August 06, 2001 4:20 PM
To:	Kaminski, Vince J
Subject:	RE: Online energy exchanges, where do we go from here?

Vince

The agenda has a number of topics of interest.  It would be worthwhile for me.

Bob

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kaminski, Vince J
Sent:	Monday, August 06, 2001 8:05 AM
To:	Lee, Bob
Subject:	FW: Online energy exchanges, where do we go from here?

Bob,

Any interest?

Vince
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	arobertshaw@eyeforenergy.com (Allison Robertshaw)@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-arobertshaw+40eyeforenergy+2Ecom+20+28Allison+20Robertshaw+29+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Friday, August 03, 2001 3:43 PM
To:	vkamins@enron.com
Subject:	Online energy exchanges, where do we go from here?

 [IMAGE] << File: http://www.eyeforenergy.com >>  [IMAGE] Kaseinvites you  to join the debate at Energy  Exchanges Online II, New Orleans 10-11 September  2001 [IMAGE]      PLUS 15% DISCOUNT -  Just quote Kase when you register and you will receive a 15%  discount on any of the event passes. [IMAGE]     Find  out how online exchanges and online trading are redefining energy  trading, and discover what it means for your business... << File: http://38.144.115.20:8080/ss?click&eyeforenergy&3b654732 >>      Over 20 High-Level Speakers Exclusive Exhibition Unrivaled Networking      [IMAGE] Hear case studies from companies  like:  Williams, Ameren, the APX, Duke, the Intercontinental  Exchange, Southern, Altra, TXU, ABN Amro, Enbridge, Petroleum,  Aquila, Calpine and the Edison Electric  Institute! [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   LISTEN << File: http://38.144.115.20:8080/ss?click&eyeforenergy&3b654732 >> to the inspirational pioneers who are creating the  new business landscape  [IMAGE]   EXPLORE << File: http://38.144.115.20:8080/ss?click&eyeforenergy&3b6546ea >>   the technical solutions you need to take advantage if online trading  platforms [IMAGE]   NETWORK << File: http://38.144.115.20:8080/ss?click&eyeforenergy&3b654d48 >>   with the industry's top players, and create the alliances you need  to succeed in 2001        Keep yourself updated as the  event grows Complete the form below << File: http://www.eyeforenergy.com/usa2001/mailshot/neworleans2001_kase.html#updateform >> .   [IMAGE]  CLICK  HERE for event feesand Registration details << File: http://38.144.115.20:8080/ss?click&eyeforenergy&3b654e29 >>     For more information, please complete the form below << File: http://www.eyeforenergy.com/usa2001/mailshot/neworleans2001_kase.html#updateform >> .
  I am interested in Attending Energy  Exchanges Online II  Speaking at Energy Exchanges Online II  Sponsoring Energy  Exchanges Online II  Exhibiting at Energy Exchanges Online II    *Denotes Required fields *First  Name:  *Last  Name:  *Email:  *Company:  Address:  Postal/Zip Code:  City:  State:  Country:  *Telephone:  Comments:   Your discount code:   Please subscribe me to the FREE  Eyeforenergy Briefing.       For further information, please contact:  Hilton Mundy  [t] +44  (0) 20 7375 7575  [f] +44 (0) 20 7375 7511  [e] hmundy@eyeforenergy.com << File: http://www.eyeforenergy.com/usa2001/mailshot/neworleans2001_kase.htmlmailto:hmundy@eyeforenergy.com >>   [w]  http://www.eyeforenergy.com << File: http://www.eyeforenergy.com >>


Send me your phone number?

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"JANICE STEFFES" <JANICE.STEFFES@senate.state.tx.us>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22JANICE+20STEFFES+22+20+3CJANICE+2ESTEFFES+40senate+2Estate+2Etx+2Eus+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Monday, August 13, 2001 2:42 PM
To:	James_D_Steffes@enron.com
Subject:	decorator

Can you give me the name and phone number of your decorator?

Thanks.


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/23/2001
06:24 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kathie Grabstald                           03/23/2001 03:55 PM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike A Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT, Osman
Sezgen/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: ENSIDE Draft

Good Afternoon!

Attached, please find the combined interview notes for the first draft of the
article for the ENSIDE Newsletter. Read and review your sections - they are
divided by color. Vince, please check 'everything' for content and accuracy.
Feel free to make corrections and delete anything as you see fit.

Please make changes and then send back to me.  I need it by Wednesday, April
4,  if possible.

Call me if you have any questions!
Kathie Grabstald
EWS Public Relations
x 3-9610

P.S. I am looking forward to the photo shoot on Friday, March 30 at 2:30 PM.
I will meet you all in front of the building at the big E !


Charlotte,
I forgot to call you this past weekend regarding Michael. He has an
appointment with Sharon Tuesday and Paige is taking him for me. I'm taking
my mom to the doctor Tuesday morning so I will be out of the office in the
am. If you are open Saturday I may try to take Kay out Saturday night. NM


Tana,

We have inactivated this counterparty - so should be removed from work queue.

Thanks,
Stephanie

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Jones, Tana
Sent:	Thursday, October 18, 2001 10:29 AM
To:	Clark, Claudia; Sever, Stephanie
Subject:	FW: Seminole Electric Cooperative, Inc.

If we have not located any dealmaker interested in this counterparty can we close out this counterparty and get it out of the work cue?
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Jones, Tana
Sent:	Monday, October 08, 2001 1:31 PM
To:	Clark, Claudia; Lebrocq, Wendi; Moran, Tom
Subject:	FW: Seminole Electric Cooperative, Inc.

It sounds like we may not need to follow up with this counterparty.  Any dealmaker interested in business with them?  If not, I think we should just inactivate them.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hansen, Leslie
Sent:	Monday, October 08, 2001 12:43 PM
To:	Jones, Tana
Subject:	RE: Seminole Electric Cooperative, Inc.

This Cp was primarily interest in price discovery and was going to consider whether to pursue EOL access.  I informed them that if they want EOL access, I need documentation re municipal authority.  They never followed up with me.

Leslie

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Jones, Tana
Sent:	Friday, October 05, 2001 4:03 PM
To:	Hansen, Leslie
Cc:	Clark, Claudia
Subject:	FW: Seminole Electric Cooperative, Inc.

This counterparty was on the 8/15/01 list and wanted to trade east power.  You wre checking on their ability to trade power.  Any update?
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Clark, Claudia
Sent:	Friday, October 05, 2001 2:58 PM
To:	Jones, Tana
Subject:	Seminole Electric Cooperative, Inc.

Hi Tana,
Profile Manager is pending your approval for Seminole Electric Cooperative, Inc.  Customer is calling regarding status of his application. ( He applied 4-23-01 )
Call me if you have any questions.

Thank you,
Claudia


I am coming to the conference but I am wary of your influences. No drinking,
and therefore no picking up cigarettes off the floor and smoking them, can be
permitted.

I have not dealt directly with HQ my self in the past and I know we have
entered into transactions with them ( I am not sure if we have done anyt
derivatives) but I would be careful of HQ.  Not only is a HQ a governmental
entity, I believe it is governed by Quebec civil law, with which us common
lawers are not overly familiar.  Quebec counsel might be necessary.

Peter.

From: Tana Jones on 08/28/2000 05:45 PM CDT
To: Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Hydro-Quebec

Oh guru of all things Canadian...

I'm working on comments to an ISDA that Hydro-Quebec sent us for an
affiliate, HQ Energy Services (U.S.) Inc., which is a Delaware corporation.
Is there anything special about Hydro-Quebec being the Guarantor, or just the
usual considerations having a governmental entity as the guarantor?

By the way, I hope you're coming up for the Legal Conference.  There are many
problems at Enron that need our help in getting sorted out, those kinds of
problems that lots of margaritas seem to bring out!  I'm counting on you!


Shirley,

Do you know about it?

Vince
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/05/2001
11:35 AM ---------------------------

Enron IT Purchasing
03/05/2001 11:09 AM
Please respond to Enron IT Purchasing
Sent by: ECTHOU-DOMWEB1
To: Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Confirmation of your order

This is an automatic confirmation of the request you have placed using IT
Central.

Request Number:   ECTH-4UJN5L
Order For:               Mitra Mujica

1 x ( OPTION: 128MB UPGRADE FOR DESKPRO EN 6600     $63 )
1 x ( Standard Desktop     $905 ) Enron IT Purchasing

*Please send all status inquiries regarding this request to:
mailto:receiving&hardware@enron.com


The EES VaR for today is $15.6 million, up from $14.0 million yesterday, due
to the additional short positions added at NP and SP in the Power West
portfolio.  The VaR should decrease once the short positions associated with
the University of California facilities are removed.


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/23/2001
04:33 PM ---------------------------

"Btu" <subs@btu.net> on 04/20/2001 04:47:41 PM
To: "Btu Weekly" <>
cc:
Subject: Btu Weekly

Attached is the latest issue of Btu Weekly.

e-mail: info@Btu.net
phone: 732-758-8222
fax: 732-758-8286

 - wg042301.pdf


********* Welcome to Bestfares.com's HOT DEALS BY EMAIL ************

BESTFARES.COM is your source for HOT TRAVEL DEALS. Visit our home
page at http://www.bestfares.com. Also, remember to visit our Newsdesk
daily at http://www.bestfares.com/travel_center/desks/newsdesk.asp
where we post hundreds of deals every day that could save you up
to 70% every time you travel! Subscribe and unsubscribe information
can be found at the bottom of this newsletter.

**************************** November 22, 2000  ************************

As promised, here are two deals you can gobble up for savings--$328
roundtrip to your choice of 15 Caribbean cities for travel through June 15
AND coast-to-coast U.S. travel for $198 roundtrip, or less.

Most of us are busy preparing for the Thanksgiving holiday and clearing
the decks for a  four-day weekend. Bestfares.com will be posting new deals
throughout the holiday, but we,ll make this newsletter short and sweet,
whet your appetite with the best of our specials and leave you with room
for delicious desserts of deals. Our hot, new Caribbean sale can save you
up to 60 percent in the most popular travel season, and you still have
time for last-minute savings on Turkey fares. Without further ado, we,ll
serve up our buffet of bargains.

50 U.S. CITIES TO 15 CARIBBEAN CITIES FROM $328 RT
Bestfares.com offers members a chance to perk up in a Caribbean paradise
with peak season fares beginning at only $328 roundtrip for travel through
June 15, 2001. We are having one knockout of a sale to 15 Caribbean cities
with airfares discounted by up to $500 for the high winter season, when
many travelers want to warm themselves under the tropical sun. We,ll warm
your body and protect your wallet with solar savings. From Eastern and
Southeastern cities, roundtrips are only $328; from the Midwest, $428; and
from the West Coast, just $458. These specials are valid to Caribbean
treasures including St. Maarten, San Juan, St. Croix, St. Thomas, Aruba,
Montego Bay, Grand Cayman, Cancun, Bermuda and Santo Domingo. We,ll also
save you money on travel to Nassau and other islands in the Bahamas. For
fun and sun this winter, spring to the Caribbean at
http://www.bestfares.com/view.asp?id=10088489

SUPER $198 RT SALE COAST-TO-COAST BETWEEN 58 U.S. CITIES
This past week, we watched business travelers get hit with their sixth
fare hike of the year. Some routes of over 1,500 miles have increased by
as much as $370 roundtrip since January 1, 2000. Fight back with our
leisure fares from select U.S. cities that let you fly coast to coast for
as little as $198 roundtrip through March 30, 2001 (travel to Florida
markets is valid through March 14). For example, fly from Seattle to
Orlando or San Diego to Baltimore. You have many options for travel
throughout the nation. Tickets must be purchased by December 1, 2000. Get
back some of the money the airlines have gotten for your business trips by
using our coast-to-coast $198 Super Sale fares. Access more information at
http://www.bestfares.com/view.asp?id=10067898

THERE,S STILL TIME TO FLY ON TURKEY DAY FROM $59 RT
The trick to getting a great fare for those last minute home for the
holiday flights is to travel on Thursday and return on Friday. These
specials are valid for travel throughout both days, but availability is
best for travel later in the day on Thanksgiving, and return travel early
in the day on Friday. You can enjoy a late meal with your family, pack up
some leftovers and be home in time to rest up over the weekend. These
deals start at $59 (New York City to Boston, for example). You can travel
coast to coast from $151. Fares are based on one-way mileage: 250 miles
for $64 to $79 roundtrip; 251-500 miles for $79 to $99 roundtrip; 501-750
miles for $103 to $129 roundtrip; 751-1,000 miles for $119 to $149
roundtrip; 1,001-1,250 miles for $139 to $169 roundtrip; and over 1,250
miles for $151 to $189 roundtrip. Get the big end of the holiday dinner
wishbone by checking http://www.bestfares.com/view.asp?id=10098966

EUROFARE IS BACK! HOPSCOTCH EUROPE FOR ONLY $89 PER FLIGHT
If you want to see city after city in Europe on a cheap buck there is only
one word to say and it,s &Eurofare.8  Imagine flying from Paris to Rome
for $89 or how about London to Amsterdam for that same incredibly low
rate?  All you have to do is purchase a round-trip transatlantic ticket on
Lufthansa or United Airlines from the USA to Europe and then you can
travel to more than 100 cities in 35 countries within Europe for only $89
per flight.  That,s right, Lufthansa Airlines, Eurofare is back and it,s
taking you on a ride to your favorite European cities for only $89 per
flight!

One-way fares from Frankfurt to Rome are as high as $871 and Munich to
Paris currently sells for $345 on a major European Airline. At $89 per
flight for the same cities Eurofare is a great bargain! To qualify book a
roundtrip airline ticket on Lufthansa or United Airlines now through March
30, 2001 and you can add up to six additional flights within Europe for
only $89 per flight.  Your originating transatlantic flight must depart by
March 31, 2001 and your roundtrip travel must be completed by April 7,
2001.

Some restrictions and blackouts apply so you may want to read our full
story by visiting:
http://www.bestfares.com/view.asp?id=10105980
or visit Lufthansa,s web site at:
http://www.lufthansa-usa.com/bf_efe_oc00.html

EUROPEAN CAR RENTALS STARTING AS LOW AS $14 A DAY
Our car rental partner, Auto Europe, is having a great year-end sale for
rentals booked online before December 15, 2000. During this sale you can
expect to shave up to 20% off their already low standard rates for car
rentals through end of next year (12/30/01)!  And, Auto Europe is
sweetening the deal by also throwing in a free one-week cellular phone
rental during this sale. For example, below are some of Auto Europe,s low
standard rates and if you book online during this sale you can save up to
20% more:

3-day rental in Paris - $60 (That,s only $20 a day!)
3-day rental in Munich, Frankfurt and Berlin - $79 ($26 a day!)
7-day rental in Paris - $100 (That,s only $14 a day!)
7-day rental in Munich, Frankfurt and Berlin - $132 ($19 a day!)

With savings like these on car rentals and airfares, there,s no reason why
you shouldn,t book a wonderful European vacation today. For complete
details click to our Newsdesk story at:
http://www.bestfares.com/view.asp?id=10105981. Or, book your European
rental car by visiting Auto Europe,s web site at
http://www.autoeurope.com/welcome.cfm?c=15.

Bestfares.com wishes a Happy Thanksgiving to all our members and readers.
We,re thankful for you 365 days a year. Look for our next newsletter on
Tuesday, November 28. Check our News Desk for new deals throughout the
holiday period (good thing gravy stains don,t show up on computer screens,
because we may be eating as we post). Members, please note that some of
our Travel Clubs will be closed Thursday and Friday in observance of
Thanksgiving.

********************************************************************

HOT DEALS BY EMAIL announcements feature special money-saving offers
available on Bestfares.com. This free, weekly newsletter is your
best bet to receive great, late-breaking travel deals.

Please feel free to send this newsletter to your colleagues, friends
and family and encourage them to sign up for a free subscription to
HOT DEALS BY EMAIL. Thanks to all of you who have already recommended
this newsletter to others. If this email has been forwarded to you,
you can get your own free subscription at:
http://www.bestfares.com/e-deals/e-deal.asp.

About your privacy: Our email list is used only for distribution of
our own materials. Our subscriber list will not be sold, rented, or
otherwise made available to third parties

********************************************************************

SUBSCRIPTION INFORMATION

To subscribe to the HOT DEALS BY EMAIL newsletter, please visit:
http://www.bestfares.com/e-deals/e-deal.asp.

To unsubscribe from HOT DEALS BY EMAIL, please visit:
http://www.bestfares.com/e-deals/unsubscribe.asp

To change your email address, please visit:
http://www.bestfares.com/e-deals/unsubscribe.asp
and unsubscribe from Hot Deals. Then go to:
http://www.bestfares.com/e-deals/e-deal.asp
and register your new email address.

Although every effort is made to ensure accurate information,
Bestfares.com is not responsible for any errors in this newsletter.


7:15 a.m.  I will be there.

-----Original Message-----
From: Tana.Jones@enron.com [mailto:Tana.Jones@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2000 8:43 AM
To: pyoung@pdq.net
Subject: RE: Nutcracker Market/Saturday

Sounds good to me.  I'll see you tomorrow am!

                    "Patti Young"
                    <pyoung@pdq.n        To:     <Tana.Jones@enron.com>
                    et>                  cc:
                                         Subject:     RE: Nutcracker
Market/Saturday
                    11/10/2000
                    11:44 AM

Would you be ready to roll around 7:15 a.m.?  I will be glad to come to
your
house.  Let me know.

-----Original Message-----
From: Tana.Jones@enron.com [mailto:Tana.Jones@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2000 7:12 AM
To: pyoung@pdq.net
Subject: RE: Nutcracker Market/Saturday

It's just you and me tomorrow.  Soma is having furniture delivered from
Star and they said they could only come between 8-12.  So shall we drive
together?  Do you want to come to my house?  At what time?

                    "Patti Young"
                    <pyoung@pdq.n        To:     <Tana.Jones@enron.com>
                    et>                  cc:
                                         Subject:     RE: Nutcracker
Market/Saturday
                    11/09/2000
                    04:53 PM

Of course.  Do you two want to be there for the early show or I could just
meet you there later?

Also, you can sign up on the internet for the early bird show.  I don't
think you can pay when you get there, except if you go at 10 a.m.

www.houstonballet.org  Look it up here.

-----Original Message-----
From: Tana.Jones@enron.com [mailto:Tana.Jones@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 12:27 PM
To: pyoung@pdq.net
Subject: Re: Nutcracker Market/Saturday

I'm interested!  Would it be OK to invite one of my new business people
from London, she doesn't know anyone in Houston yet?

                    "Patti Young"
                    <pyoung@pdq.n        To:     "Tana Jones"
<tana.jones@enron.com>
                    et>                  cc:
                                         Subject:     Nutcracker
Market/Saturday
                    11/09/2000
                    04:01 PM

Miss Tana,

Are you interested in going to the Nutcracker Market this Saturday morning
and being there for the early bird special (8 a.m.)??  It costs $25 to get
in early, but that covers $10 admission, $5 parking, coffee and
refreshments.  Otherwise, you can go at 10 a.m., pay $10 to get in with the
rest of the crowd and $5 for parking.  I think I am going to plan to be
there around 7:40-7:45.  Let me know if you are interested.

Patti


Tony, Rick

Our counsel has provided these drafts of the project documents.  Please
review.  We also anticipate sending out the turbine contracts later today.

Please be advised of our timeline.  Since we need to fund escrow by Wednesday
21 March, it is imperative that we are able to sign these documents on Friday
16 March.  It is our assumption there will be some lag between the obligation
to fund escrow and the actual transfer of funds.

Your comments to these documents are expected by Friday 9 March.

I also want to mention that Enron initiated the additional purchase of Power
System Stabilizers, which cost $31,675 per turbine.  PSS are required in the
WSCC, but you will have to  determine whether or not your particular project
would be required to install these in New England.  If you desire this
optional equipment, please reflect that cost in your final bid.

Steve
---------------------- Forwarded by Stephen Thome/HOU/ECT on 03/07/2001 10:20
AM ---------------------------


Dave will be out of the office December 23, 2000 until Monday, January 8,
2001.  He will be checking his voicemail and will have his cell phone.

The following are the numbers where he can be reached:

 December 24  thru December 26 - Saskatoon, SK   (306) 374-9587 or Cell
Phone   (713) 907-6315

 December 27 thru January 7 - Fairmont, B.C.  (250) 345-4569 or Cell Phone
(713) 907-6315

Beverly (x 5-7857) will be available to assist you if you need any help
reaching Dave....

Happy Holidays,


This Wed or Thurs, could you update the monthly Cal '02 prices for me again?

							Permian
							San Juan
							SoCalGas

Hopefully, this will be the last time.  I need to give Tracy the final version of an abbreviated presentation (for Ken Lay mtg 11/8) by the end of this week.  I just wanted to refresh the numbers one more time.


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/07/2001 10:00
AM ---------------------------

	From:  Chris Booth                           03/07/2001 09:53 AM

To: Lisa Bills/Enron@EnronXGate
cc: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: FW: Blue Dog #2

Lisa,

Sorry, I should have included you in the initial distribution.

Ben Jacoby and I are in negotiations with NorthWestern Corporation in a deal
to place the two GE 7EA's (Blue Dog) turbines.  NorthWestern has indicated a
strong interest in adding the dual fuel option to the February 2002 delivered
turbine.  We hope to have NorthWestern sign the LOI by next Friday, 16
(3/16/01) and pay the "Development Fee".  This transaction should be similar
to the Intergen deal, with the exception that instead of moving two turbines
out of the 24 LM 6000 master contract, we plan on assigning the entire Blue
Dog contract to a LLC that Enron will own 100% at the time of transfer and
then sell 80% to NorthWestern.

I want to have the change order ready for execution once we come to terms
with NorthWestern.  In the event that the deal blows up, we will probably
execute the change anyway.  Please let me know if you have any questions or
concerns.

Chris
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Booth/NA/Enron on 03/07/2001 09:40
AM ---------------------------

Kay Mann
03/07/2001 09:35 AM
To: Chris Booth/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: FW: Blue Dog #2

Chris,  Global Finance (Lisa Bills) needs to be kept in the loop on this,
since this is in TurboPark.

Kay

	From:  Chris Booth                           03/07/2001 09:12 AM

To: Renee Alfaro/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Brian D
Barto/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: FW: Blue Dog #2

Renee and Brian,

Please prepare a change order to add dual fuel to the February '02 delivery
turbine.  The price and commercial information is below.  I have gotten Jeff
Darst to extend the deadline to exercise the change order to 16 March 2001.

Please make sure we get the change order prepared before the deadline expires.

Chris
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Booth/NA/Enron on 03/07/2001 09:08
AM ---------------------------

jeffrey.darst@ps.ge.com on 02/21/2001 12:24:18 PM
To: chris.booth@enron.com
cc:

Subject: FW: Blue Dog #2

I did send it to the wrong address.  Sorry.

> -----Original Message-----
> From:   Darst, Jeffrey A (PS, PPSD)
> Sent:   Tuesday, February 13, 2001 4:06 PM
> To:   Booth, Chris (Enron)
> Subject:   Blue Dog #2
>
> Chris,
>
> The price to change this unit from Gas Only to Dual Fuel (distillate) is
> $1,445,000.  Based on the payment schedule in Exhibit I-1, 32% of this
> would be due the end of this month.  The remaining payments would be in
> accordance with the payment schedule for Unit #2 in the exhibit.  We are
> putting together a spreadsheet that defines this.
>
> The offer to make this scope change expires at the end of this month.
> After that time, we will be committed to the gas only configuration.
>
> The CM&U group is putting together a proposal to convert unit #1 to dual
> fuel.
>
> Regards,
>
> Jeff
> Global Power Plant Systems
> 518-385-0663
> 518-381-1513 (fax)
>


yep, please

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Tuesday, November 20, 2001 12:56 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

you get silly.  i get dummy.  i can't go you goofball!  are you really going?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Tuesday, November 20, 2001 12:55 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

no dummy its next week, maybe we can see the tree in rockefeller center, im really psyched

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Tuesday, November 20, 2001 12:54 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

you are so funny!  i cna't go thursday because i have to be here to eat turkey and i have to be in dallas on saturday night to go out for my birthday.  sorry.  maybe next time.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Tuesday, November 20, 2001 12:53 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

no thanks but i did book our tickets to ny, we leave on thur night and come back sunday, happy packing


Following are EPMI weighted average trade prices for Tues., March 27. After
discussing this e-mail with my manager, we've decided to only send the
information previously sent via fax. If you have any questions on individual
deals, please don't hesitate to call.

Thanks,
Kate Symes
Trading Support
503-464-7486


This will be fine - just let me know when you are going to be gone.

Shirley

Anita DuPont@ENRON
11/29/2000 05:01 PM
To: Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Update / Event Time Change

Shirley, this is the committee that I discussed with you this morning.  The
below email outlines the time required.  Thanks for your consideration.

Anita
---------------------- Forwarded by Anita DuPont/NA/Enron on 11/29/2000 04:55
PM ---------------------------

11/29/2000 04:46 PM
Charla Reese@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Charla Reese@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Charla Reese@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
11/29/2000 04:46 PM
11/29/2000 04:46 PM
To: Daryl Kitchen@Enron Communications, Missy Stevens@ENRON, Misha
Siegel@ECT, Zulie Flores/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Maggie
Valles/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rose
Rivera/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Donnis Traylor/HOU/EES@EES,
Raquel Guerrero@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS, Elsie Lew@ECT, Mary
Ellenberger/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rebecca Longoria@ENRON, Joy Werner@ENRON, David
Tagliarino@ECT, Janie Bonnard, Sylvia Thomas@ENRON, Lillian Villarreal@ENRON,
Valerie Villareal/HOU/EES@EES, Stephanie Baker/HOU/EES@EES, Dianne
Langeland/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Laura Schwartz@Enron, deb Gebhardt@ENRON,
Heather Alon@ECT, Michael Cuccia/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bert Frazier@ECT, Susan
Rouse@EES, Sandy Lewelling@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS, Sonia Garcia/HOU/EES@EES,
Dolores Escamilla@ECT, Anita DuPont/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Elyse Kalmans@Enron, Greg Grissom@ENRON

Subject: Update / Event Time Change

Thanks to everyone for attending the meeting today!

EVENT TIME CHANGE!!!
I just spoke with the Office of the Chairman and have learned that Ken and
Jeff are actually available during the morning of December 19th from 8:00am
until 11:00am.  As a result, our plans have changed just a little and I have
requested whether or not they are willing to pose for Polaroid pictures with
employees - I'll let you know what I find out!  We will still have the jazz
duet and informational poster displays in the lobby throughout the day and
instead of dessert items, we'll order breakfast stuff.

ASSIGNMENTS / BUDGET!!!!
Please note assignments below; for each team, collaborate between now and our
next meeting to determine what purchases need to be made - budgets will be
discussed at that meeting.  Again, it will be on Wednesday, December 6th from
9:30am until 10:30am with the location TBD.

Kwanzaa - Daryl Kitchen* / Liz Taylor
Chinese New Year - Elsie Lew* / Anita Dupont
Las Posadas - Zulie Flores* / Maggie Valles / Lillian Villeral
Christmas - Donnis Traylor* / Missy Stevens / Michael Cuccia
Chanukah - Laura Schwartz* / Heather Alon
Ramadan - Sylvia Thomas* / Janie Bonnard / Dianne Langeland
St. Lucia - Joy Werner* / Stephanie Baker
Devali - Sonia Garcia* / Sophie Patel / Rebecca Longoria
Greeters / Traffic Control / Corsages - Sandy Lewelling
Executive Floor - Deb Gebhardt
Logistics - Charla Reese (Communication, Entertainment, Food, Picture Holders)
Photographer - Laura Schwartz
Houston Children's Choir - Misha Siegel

* indicates Holiday Team Leader

RESPONSIBILITIES
Attend planning committee meetings and work with other volunteers assigned to
your holiday.
Research meaning of holiday and determine appropriate decorations, symbols, &
food items - purchase after budget approval.
Create information sheet for employee hand-out.
Decorate between 7:00am and 8:00am on 12/19.
Be creative!  (play appropriate recorded music, dress up in related clothing,
etc.)
Ensure office is manned during open house (8:00am - 11:00am) - answer any
questions, pass out materials, etc.
Recruit additional volunteers!

ADDITIONAL VOLUNTEERS
Delores Escamilla
Val Villeral
Raquel Guerrero
Bert Frazier
David Tagliarino
Rose Riveria

THANK YOU!

Charla
x35202


Tana -

This is the final form:

Mark
Senior Counsel, ENA
Phone:     713-345-8897
Facsimile: 713-646-3940
E-Mail:      Mark.Greenberg@enron.com

	Tana Jones@ECT
	03/05/2001 09:03 AM

		 To: Mark Greenberg/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Base BETA Agreement

Is this the final form?

	Mark Greenberg@ENRON
	02/23/2001 10:37 AM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Base BETA Agreement

Mark -

I made the change we discussed in Section 2(c).  Please let me know if this
works.

Thanks.

Mark
Senior Counsel, ENA
Phone:     713-345-8897
Facsimile: 713-646-3940
E-Mail:      Mark.Greenberg@enron.com


print
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 12/27/2000
10:59 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Mark Smith @ ENRON                           12/21/2000 12:09 PM

To: Anthony Sexton/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: john.romero@mms.gov, Russell Dyk/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kenneth
Shulklapper/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mog Heu/NA/Enron@Enron (bcc: Jeffrey A
Shankman/HOU/ECT)
Subject: Re: PADD V-California Gas Injection

Anthony,

 Here is what I can add:

1. Looks like the Conventional Steam Boilers used by producers in the field
(average boiler: 50 Million Btu/hr, uses 1400 mmbtu/day of gas) that have
been shut-in, use approx.. 100,000- 150,000 mmbtu/day of gas  (mainly,
Texaco, Chevron, and independents).  This number can vary depending on which
majors have firm transport on the pipelines and don't have to pay spot SOCAL
Border prices.  This steam generation is used in either Steam Floods or
Cyclic Steam Operations.
2. Crude production has probably not been affected, but if the injections
stay down, you could see production start to fall off in 3 or 4 months.
Crude prices in California are very weak right now (Kern River diffs are
$10-13 under WTI when they normal run in the $5.80/$6.10 area).  Majors that
have downstream facilities have outlets for their crude and probably have no
plans to cut production.  Independents are seeing weakness on the buying side
for the West Coast Independents and majors that normally buy their crude.  It
might be 2-3 months before things clean up a bit out there on the crude side.
3. Gas injection-  The question here is due producers decide to risk the
integrity of their reservoir's by reducing pressure and not injecting the
gas.  This probably would only be done for a month or two.  Noone wants to
damage any of their wells.  This volume is not well known, but in the overall
picture really shouldn't affect prices that significantly.  Usually this gas
is pretty sour and does not command a high price.  This would also be the
cheapest source or gas for producers to use (if they bought any make-up gas
for their process).
4. Referring to the question #2, the majority of EOR methods used in
California are Steam Floods and Cyclic Steam Processes.  The oil is very
heavy and needs HEAT in order to recover it out of the ground.  Just
injecting gas would not accomplish this.  There are a lot of CO-GEN units
that generate steam for most of the Majors and these are not being shut-in or
slowed down.  Only sustain high gas prices for 6 months would probably start
affecting Crude production.  Let's remember that in 1998-9 crude prices were
extremely low and normal gas prices didn't change what most producers did,
because if they shut-in too many wells, the production would never come back.

If you have anymore questions, please let me know.   Thanks

Mark

Anthony Sexton
12/20/2000 12:22 PM
To: john.romero@mms.gov
cc: Russell Dyk/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kenneth Shulklapper/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mog
Heu/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark Smith/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: PADD V-California Gas Injection

Hello, John.

Again, thanks for your cooperation.

Summary:
A West gas trader received news from Seneca Resources stating that California
crude producers that use natural gas injection (or gas lifting?) for
secondary and tertiary recovery methods may stop injection and - instead -
sell the gas into the market to benefit from the record high natgas prices.
That being so, one wonders how much natural gas will be put back into the
market and how California crude yields will be affected.

Here are some specific questions that may help us:
How often is natural gas used in California to enhance crude production
(including gas injection/lifting, steam injection, and hot water injection)?
Is this really a significant issue?
What is the law concerning onshore gas injection?  If the gas was bought (not
produced) by the crude producer, is the crude producer obligated to recover
the injected gas?  If yes, must 100% of the gas be proven to be recoverable?
On average, how much natgas volume is injected in an oil field to recover
production?
What is an approximate number of producing oil fields in California and/or
PADD 5
What is the average size of these crude reservoirs?
How many of these fields use natgas for enhanced oil recovery (EOR) -
reiterating question #1?
Is there a unit estimate of approximately how many MMBtus/Mcfs of natgas is
needed to produce 1 barrel of crude onshore?
How would stopping gas injection/lifting affect crude supply in California?
Would crude wells be shut-in?  If so, how would that affect future efforts to
produce from them?
Will a significant amount of crude be held from the market - especially in
the PADD 5/Western region?
What commodities are substitutes for natgas in secondary/tertiary EOR and how
liquid are they in the West?  How feasible, expeditious, and economical is it
for any producing oil field to use another substance for EOR?

John, I really appreciate your willingness to help unearth this information.
The priority on this matter is urgent, so we would be extra grateful for a
prompt response.  Please do not hesitate to call me at 713-853-6304, Russell
Dyk at 713-853-7332, or Ken Shulklapper at 713-853-7009 for any further
questions or comments.

Sincerely,

Anthony


Got it. Never mind.

Dan
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)

-----Original Message-----
From: McCarty, Danny <Danny.McCarty@ENRON.com>
To: Armstrong, Julie <Julie.Armstrong@ENRON.com>
Sent: Fri Nov 23 16:07:32 2001
Subject: Fw: Re: FW: Transwestern information requests

Julie,
     Do you have a number for Steve?

Dan
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)

-----Original Message-----
From: Hayslett, Rod <Rod.Hayslett@ENRON.com>
To: McCarty, Danny <Danny.McCarty@ENRON.com>
Sent: Fri Nov 23 16:04:24 2001
Subject: Re: FW: Transwestern information requests

I haven't heard back from Steve at all.   Do you have anumber for him?
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


Hello everyone,

Hope you all are doing well.
I believe the Cross Timbers rebooking nitemare has finally come to an end!
All we need to do now is send out the revised confirms.

Accounting:
Below is a list of deal numbers that were either changed, killed, or created.
I believe this is everything.

Please let me know if I seem to be missing any deals or if you have any
questions.

Best Regards and THANK YOU to everyone who has contributed to this 'project'!

Sheetal Patel
x36740

January 2001
Killed  Fin Nymex Volume reduced  Fin Basis Volume reduced Phys fwd Index
Volume Reduced New Phys fwd FP
QN3416.1         Q59778.1    Q59778.4 (271506)
QH4152.1     QH4295.1   Q59778.1    Q59778.5 (271506)
QH4318.2
QH4119.1         E90067.1/V37619.1   E90067.5 (309136)
QH4117.1         Q59784.1, .2/V37860.1, .2  Q5978.3, .4(309136)
QH4318.1

February 2001
Killed  Fin Nymex Volume reduced  Fin Basis Volume reduced Phys fwd Index
Volume Reduced New Phys fwd FP
QH4152.1     Q48050.1        Q35983.1 (434968)
QN3415.1         E90067.1/V37619.1   E90067.5 (594576)
QN3415.1         Q59784.1, .2/V37860.1, .2  Q59784.3, .4 (594576)

March 2001
Killed  Fin Nymex Volume reduced  Fin Basis Volume reduced Phys fwd Index
Volume Reduced New Phys fwd FP
QO9630.1         V37860.1, .2    Q59784.5 (594576)

April 01 - Sept 01
Killed  Fin Nymex Volume reduced  Fin Basis Volume reduced Phys fwd Index
Volume Reduced New Phys fwd FP
QO5953.1         Q59778.2, .3    Q59778.6, .7 (271506)
  QO5953.2       V37860.1    Q59784.6 (594576)


Happy New Year and thanks again for your support on the Arena Prop.

A consulting group that I have worked with over the last 10 years in
California tells me there may be an initiative in 2002 (March or November)
to undo electric deregulation there.  This group is Woodward & McDowell.
They specialize in propositions.

In 2000, Baselice & Associates polled in their success efforts to defeat
Prop 25 (march) and pass Prop 35 (nov).  I highly recommend that any
coalition formed to defeat a proposition in California contact Woodward &
McDowell.  Call me if you would like to know more about them, or just call
Dave Fogarty at 650-340-0470.

Mike

MICHAEL BASELICE
Baselice & Associates, Inc.
4131 Spicewood Springs Road
Suite O-2
Austin, TX  78759
Phone: (512) 345-9720
Fax: (512) 345-9740
email: mikeb@baselice.com


its on the way

>>> <Mark.Guzman@enron.com> 03/16/01 08:06AM >>>

Hey could you do me a favor and fax me my brackets.  i dont really remember
all of my picks.  my fax number is 503-464-3740.  email me when you send
it. Thanks dude.


Mary Hain has resigned her position with Enron.  Please remove her from all
your mail lists.

Thank you.

Lysa Akin
Gov't Affairs - Sr. Admin. Ass't.

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Jackie Gallagher" <JGallagher@epsa.org>
03/28/2001 09:57 AM

To: <bhawkin@enron.com>, <bmerola@enron.com>, <christi.l.nicolay@enron.com>,
<donna.fulton@enron.com>, <janelle.scheuer@enron.com>,
<jeff_brown@enron.com>, <jhartso@enron.com>, <jsteffe@enron.com>,
<Mary.Hain@enron.com>, <rshapiro@enron.com>, <sarah.novosel@enron.com>,
<tom.hoatson@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: NERC Summit-- April 18 at 10 a.m.

MEMORANDUM

TO: Regulatory Affairs Committee
       Power Marketers Working Group
       Industry Operations Committee
       ? Board and Associate Companies Only

FROM: Joe Hartsoe, Regulatory Affairs Committee Chair
            Bob Reilley, Power Marketers Working Group Chair
            Ron Lowman, Industry Operations Committee Chair
            Julie Simon, Vice President of Policy
            Mark Stultz, Vice President of Public Affairs
            Mark Bennett, Senior Manager of Policy

DATE: March 28, 2001

RE: NERC Summit
      ? Wednesday, April 18, at 10 a.m.

The NERC Board of Trustees is scheduled to have a very important meeting on
Friday, March 30th, on the future organization of NERC-the so-called "NERC to
NAERO transition."  NERC is poised to eliminate its traditional board
structure, long dominated by its regional councils, and adopt an independent
board along with some form of a stakeholder advisory committee.  This
watershed event provides an opportunity for EPSA, and its member companies,
to carefully evaluate participation in NERC, its committees and the
activities in the regions.

Specifically, we want to focus on what matters, if any, NERC is presently
addressing that warrant the continued attention and participation of EPSA
and/or its members.  For those issues that are affecting, or could
potentially affect, the business interests of EPSA's members, what is the
most efficient and effective role EPSA could play?  What is the best forum
for resolving reliability-related technical issues beyond FERC's expertise?

To facilitate this discussion, EPSA will be hosting a half-day summit to
discuss the outcome of NERC's March 30th meeting and its implications for
EPSA's allocation of resources to NERC activities on Wednesday, April 18 at
10 a.m.  We encourage members to attend in person at the new EPSA offices at
1401 New York Ave., 11th Floor, Washington, D.C.  However, we will also make
participation by conference call available.  We encourage all companies,
whether or not they are currently active in NERC, to participate in this
important meeting.

Please RSVP for the meeting using the form below to Jackie Gallagher either
by fax (202-628-8260) or e-mail (jgallagher@epsa.org).

NERC Summit

_____  Yes, I will attend the April 18th meeting

_____  No, I will not be able to attend in person, but I would like to
            participate by phone.

Name:___________________ Company:__________________________

Phone: __________________ E-mail:_____________________________


Sara,
They had the number off by $10,000.  That is the only change to the previous
document.

-Dan
---------------------- Forwarded by Daniel Diamond/HOU/ECT on 10/02/2000
10:02 AM ---------------------------

Lamar Curtis <LCurtis@fyi-net.com> on 10/02/2000 09:42:58 AM
To: "Dan Diamond (E-mail)" <Daniel.Diamond@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Quick change on PWD

 - EnronOnline-FYI-Net PWD #2 9-26-00.doc


Attached is an email from Rogelio Lopez Velarde summarizing the current
status of the Amparo proceeding related to the Vitro project.  The attached
analysis clearly differs from the information provided by the Lopez Velarde
firm at the end of December when they indicated the Amparo proceeding should
be dismissed by the end of January.

As I believe you are aware, the dismissal with prejudice of the Amparo
proceeding is a condition precedent to first disubursement under the Vitro
Loan Agreement.  Although there are still many other conditions that must be
satisfied before first disbursement can occur, we do not anticipate that six
weeks will pass before such conditions have been satisfied.

Therefore, I contacted the inhouse attorney for the lender, the
Inter-American Development Bank, to discuss the status of the Amparo
proceeding with him.  At my urging, he has agreed that the Inter-American
Development Bank will waive the dismissal of the Amparo proceeding as a
condition to first disbursement and will, instead, require that the
proceeding be dismissed prior to second disbursement.  I have been informed
that second disbursement will not occur until at least a month subsequent to
first disbursement.  In such case, it is anticipated that the waiver of this
condition to first disbursement will provide sufficient time for the docket
to be cleared and for the Amparo proceeding to be dismissed prior to second
disbursement.

The project company will be required to request in writing that the
Inter-American Development Bank waive this condition precedent and such
written request will be prepared after a review to determine whether other
waivers may be requested but in sufficient time for the Inter-American
Development Bank to process the request through their internal channels prior
to the date of first disbursement.

Should you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact
me.
----- Forwarded by Peggy Banczak/HOU/ECT on 01/25/2001 04:03 PM -----

	Rogelio L?pez Velarde <rlopezv@lvha.com.mx>
	01/23/2001 11:19 AM
	Please respond to Rogelio L?pez Velarde

		 To: "Peggy Banczak" <Peggy.Banczak@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Amparo Appeal

Dear Peggy:
?
Last Friday Jorge Canals and I met with the clerk of the First  Circuit Court
of Appeals for Mexico City to discuss the appeal filed by the  petitioner,
Consorcio Desarrollo Econ?mico Mexicano, S.A. de C.V.?This  clerk is in
charge of?preparing the resolution for the judge that will be  presenting the
case before the other two judges that compose the?court of  appeals.
?
The purpose of this first meeting was to deliver copies of all  of the other
cases that have been dismissed, and to deliver a Memorandum of Law  that we
prepared for him.
?
As you know, it is important that the court of appeals  becomes?aware about
the fact that the same petitioner has filed 6  almost-identical Amparo
complaints, and that all of them have been dismissed  with prejudice (there
is only one pending an appeal). This is relevant because  in all of these
cases the courts have dismissed the complaints based on the same  grounds:
lack of standing, and therefore, such cases were never  published.
?
As we have monitored, the clerk confirmed to us that our case  is number 25
in the docket. Unfortunately, and since the docket order cannot be  changed,
the clerk believes that the case may be resolved in about 6  weeks.
?
As discussed before, we are planning to meet with the sitting  judge
in-chambers next week, along with the General Counsel of the Energy
Regulatory Commission, to see what we can do to expedite the resolution of
the  case, and more importantly, to make sure that the complaint is
conclusively  dismissed with prejudice, as required under the financing
agreements.
?
Very truly yours,
?
Rogelio Lopez-Velarde?
Hern?n Gonz?lez
?
Lopez Velarde, Heftye, Abogados
Guillermo Gonzalez Camarena  No. 1600, Piso 6
Col. Santa Fe, Centro de Ciudad
01210 Mexico,  D.F
Telephone: (52) 5081-14-24
Fax: (52) 5081-14-25
e-mail: rlopezv@lvha.com.mx?
?
The information contained herein may be confidential and/or  privileged.?
This information is intended to be reviewed only by the  individual or the
entity to which is addressed.? If the reader of this  e-mail message is not
the intended recipient or a representative of the intended  recipient you are
hereby notified that any review, dissemination or copying of  this e-mail
message or the information contained herein is prohibited.? If  you have
received this e-mail message in error, please immediately notify the  sender
and delete this communication from your  system.


Jeff:

Please include the Chamber of Commerce on the petition for re-hearing.

Dominic.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Tuesday, September 25, 2001 9:05 AM
To:	Dasovich, Jeff; Delaney Hunter ; 'Lenny Goldberg' ; 'Jack M. Stewart' ; 'John R. Redding (PS, NE) (E-mail)' ; 'Evelyn Kahl' ; 'Keith McCrea' ; 'Mike Kahl' ; 'Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)' ; 'Bill Booth' ; 'Dorothy Rothrock' ; 'Ann Cohn' ; 'Jan Smutny-Jones' ; 'John Fielder (E-mail)' ; 'Barbara Barkovich' ; 'Dominic DiMare' ; 'Karen Terranova' ; 'Marc D. Joseph' ; 'Art Carter' ; 'Bill Dombrowski' ; 'Derek Naten' ; 'John White' ; 'Robert Albergotti (E-mail)' ; 'Diana Liebman (E-mail)' ; 'Linda Sherif (E-mail)' ; Mike Florio (E-mail) ; Phil Isenberg (E-mail) ; Tom McMorrow (E-mail)
Subject:	RE: FERC To Examine Alleged Market Manipulation By Calif ISO.  FERC Meeting in California on Monday.  CSFB on PCG Proposal.

I've been informed that the CSFB report on PG&E's reorg didn't make it first time round.  Trying again.
Best,
Jeff
 << File: 092101PCG.pdf >>

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Friday, September 21, 2001 7:23 PM
To:	'Delaney Hunter '; ''Lenny Goldberg' '; ''Jack M. Stewart' '; ''John R. Redding (PS, NE) (E-mail)' '; ''Evelyn Kahl' '; ''Keith McCrea' '; ''Mike Kahl' '; ''Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)' '; ''Bill Booth' '; ''Dorothy Rothrock' '; ''Ann Cohn' '; ''Jan Smutny-Jones' '; ''John Fielder (E-mail)' '; ''Barbara Barkovich' '; ''Dominic DiMare' '; ''Karen Terranova' '; ''Marc D. Joseph' '; ''Art Carter' '; ''Bill Dombrowski' '; ''Derek Naten' '; ''John White' '; ''Robert Albergotti (E-mail)' '; ''Diana Liebman (E-mail)' '; ''Linda Sherif (E-mail)' '; 'Mike Florio (E-mail) '; 'Phil Isenberg (E-mail) '; 'Tom McMorrow (E-mail) '
Subject:	FERC To Examine Alleged Market Manipulation By Calif ISO.  FERC Meeting in California on Monday.  CSFB on PCG Proposal.

FYI.
Thought folks might be interested in the following story.
In addition, I've attached at the end for those that are interested a CSFB report on PG&E's POR announced yesterday.
Very much enjoyed working with this group on a solution for California.  Perhaps, given were things stand, we'll have another shot at helping get the market, California energy policy, and Edison, back on their feet.
Best,
Jeff

FERC To Examine Alleged Market Manipulation By Calif ISO
Updated: Friday, September 21, 2001 04:53 PM ET By Jason Leopold Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES
LOS ANGELES (Dow Jones)--Federal energy regulators may investigate whether the operator of California's wholesale electricity market has been manipulating its power-purchasing practices to reduce the costs of power the state purchased under long-term contracts, according to documents obtained Friday by Dow Jones Newswires Friday.
At issue is whether the California Independent System Operator has violated its own market rules by purchasing expensive power secured by the state under contracts rather than cheaper power available in the spot market. The state's need to sell off surplus power secured under those contracts has proven embarrassing for Gov. Gray Davis, who signed $43 billion in deals to head off a summer of spiking prices and blackouts that never materialized.
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission will hold a meeting in California Monday to address generators' complaints. The energy companies say that the California ISO's purchasing decisions are difficult to comprehend and out of line with the market, according to a letter sent by Andrea Wolfman, lead FERC counsel for market oversight and enforcement.
The letter was sent to the ISO, the California Department of Water Resources - which has been buying power in lieu of the state's struggling utilities since mid-January - and several generators, all of which were to attend the meeting.
"Recently we have become concerned that the scheduling and dispatch procedures of the California ISO, as they have had to change in the last nine months, are not well understood or are not well suited to the current market structure," Wolfman said in her letter. "The purpose of the meeting is to develop agreement between the ISO and those that participate in the scheduling and dispatch (generators, utilities, CDWR) on appropriate practices and procedures."
ISO Procedures Need Explaining -FERC
The ISO's main responsibility is keeping power supply and demand in balance on the state's electrical grid. As part of that job, the ISO determines which power plants to call into service and which suppliers to buy power from.
If the ISO can't explain how it makes its decisions, FERC may conduct an audit of the organization and investigate the possibility it has manipulated the market, Wolfman's office said.
"As discussed, FERC may schedule a technical conference and operational audit of CAISO," a second letter from FERC's market oversight and enforcement division states. "This unprecedented examination of CAISO operations could lead to the belief that complaints by generators of market manipulation and other practices by the ISO should be investigated."
The ISO's operating rules generally call for it to purchase the cheapest power first.
"The information that (generators) have provided all leads to a theory that the CAISO is manipulating the market in order to purchase surplus DWR power at high prices and protect Gov. Davis from political embarrassment," the second letter says.
The ISO has said only that the market isn't operating as intended, and declined to answer other questions about the allegations or discuss Monday's meeting.
Generators Confused
Generators, including Mirant Corp. (MIR <http://quicken.excite.com/investments/quotes/?symbol=MIR>, news <http://quicken.excite.com/investments/news/?symbol=MIR>, msgs <http://quicken.excite.com/investments/discuss/?symbol=MIR>), Reliant Energy Inc. (REI <http://quicken.excite.com/investments/quotes/?symbol=REI>, news <http://quicken.excite.com/investments/news/?symbol=REI>, msgs <http://quicken.excite.com/investments/discuss/?symbol=REI>), Williams Cos. (WMB <http://quicken.excite.com/investments/quotes/?symbol=WMB>, news <http://quicken.excite.com/investments/news/?symbol=WMB>, msgs <http://quicken.excite.com/investments/discuss/?symbol=WMB>), Duke Energy (DUK <http://quicken.excite.com/investments/quotes/?symbol=DUK>, news <http://quicken.excite.com/investments/news/?symbol=DUK>, msgs <http://quicken.excite.com/investments/discuss/?symbol=DUK>) and Dynegy Inc. (DYN <http://quicken.excite.com/investments/quotes/?symbol=DYN>, news <http://quicken.excite.com/investments/news/?symbol=DYN>, msgs <http://quicken.excite.com/investments/discuss/?symbol=DYN>), have bought apparently inexpensive power in the ISO's spot market only to find weeks later that the price was much higher. That's because, according to the allegations, the ISO is letting DWR supply expensive power into the market as "out-of-market" purchases that aren't averaged into the real-time prices that ISO market participants see.
DWR continues to buy out-of-market power regularly at the ISO's request, DWR operations chief Pete Garris has said, but those purchases are being made in the spot market and are never being satisfied by power from DWR's long-term contracts.
The out-of-market purchases appear to be expensive, however. According to the ISO's August market report, the average out-of-market price for peak hours was $55.90 a megawatt-hour, compared with $26.49/MWh on the ISO computerized market. Brokered prices of western electricity have been lower than the out-of-market prices for months.
None of the companies mentioned was willing to comment on the record.
The meeting is scheduled to be held at the ISO's headquarters in Folsom, Calif., and representatives from power producers, utilities and the state are expected to attend. FERC will serve as facilitator, Wolfman said. The meeting isn't open to the public.
The meeting will begin with a presentation by the ISO on its practices and operational procedures, followed by adjustments that may be needed to improve the market.
"The objective is to develop a written set of procedures that is agreed to by all the market participants and that is consistent with good utility practices," Wolfman said in the letter.
-By Jason Leopold, Dow Jones Newswires; 323-658-3874; jason.leopold@dowjones.com <mailto:jason.leopold@dowjones.com>
   << File: 092101PCG.pdf >>
**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Attached is the first draft of the ESA facility agreement. which I believe is
current through yesterday's discussion.
I would appreciate it if you could forward this to the persons in Transaction
Support and Tax who are working on this transaction.

Thanks,

Kay

---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/30/2000 03:05
PM ---------------------------

"Thompson, Peter J." <peterthompson@akllp.com> on 11/30/2000 02:30:37 PM
To: "Kay Mann (E-mail)" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc: "Pipitone, Paul" <paulpipitone@akllp.com>, "Cobb, Chris"
<chriscobb@akllp.com>

Subject: Attached Files

Attached please find a clean draft of the Enron South America Turbine
Agreement, as well as a blackline showing changes made to the from
document agreed to by GE.

The only additional information that we need to insert into the
agreement is the Agreement Number in Section 6.7.1.

I will send the exhibits in a few moments.
 <<ESA Break-out Agreement Draft of 11/30/00.DOC>>  <<Comparison of
Enron South America Turbine Agreement.DOC>>
 - 00.DOC
 - Comparison of Enron South America Turbine Agreement.DOC


Guys and Gals --

Commercial wants our opinion (in fact they want us to contact the CPUC and
legislative members) to gauge the "true" meaning of the DA bypass of the
3c/kwh Surcharge.  This question basically has arisen because there is a
customer that we may not re-DASR if the Surcharge bypass extends in
perpetuity (or if at least is there a Window of Opportunity that keeps
customers from paying).  Put in other words, would anyone give us a "free
pass" if we move load to DA right now and promise to keep them there with no
ability to return to electric utility service?

My current analysis looks something like this --

The term "Surcharge" is only applicable until the end of the AB1890 rate
freeze (which will end no later than March.1.02 and may end earlier if (a)
federal court finds in PG&E/SCE favor or (b) California legislature mandates
an earlier end-date.  Surcharge is a "term of art" to get around the problems
of the AB1890 rate freeze.
At the end of the AB1890 rate freeze, it is my understanding that the CPUC
will modify fully the rate structure and level to ensure full cost recovery
on a going forward basis (therefore Utility Retained Generation, QF expense,
CDWR current expenses (both energy purchase and financing costs will be
included).
Other outstanding costs will include (1) Utility Undercollection from May.00
until when no additional CA-ISO costs are applied) and (2) CDWR costs
beginning Jan.17.01 until the end of AB1890 rate freeze new rates.
Understanding how these costs will be recovered and by whom will most likely
(70%) be decided by the Legislature with some decision-making by the CPUC.
Utility Undercollection Bypass - 25%
CDWR Jan.17.01 thru AB1890 end Bypass - 80% for people who never were on
Utility Service, 10% for people who used Utility Service post Jan.17.01
CDWR Net Unavoidable Bypass - 10% for people who used Utility Service post
Jan.17.01, 80% for others.

LEGISLATION IMPACTING THIS DECISION

There are three key direct access bills being considered (the Bowen bill -
SB2x27, the Kelley bill - AB2x42, and the Battin bill - SB2x??).

The Bowen bill would remove the DA suspension authority granted in AB1x1 and
replace it with the following (1) if a customer has not bought from an
electric utility on or after Jan.17.01 there are no charges [except there may
be an entrance fee to use the electric utility going forward] and (2) if a
customer wants to switch from an electric utility to an ESP they must pay "to
the department any uncollected amounts equivalent to the department's net
unavoidable cost of power procurement, including any financing costs,
attributable to that customer" to ensure the satisfaction of any power
purchase obligation or bond obligation to serve "that customer".  The
recovery period shall be coincident with the terms of bonds issued to finance
the purchases.  The CPUC has 90 days from the effective date to notify
customers of their obligations.

The Kelley bill would remove the DA suspension authority granted in AB1x1 and
replace it with the following (1) if a customer has not bought from an
electric utility on or after Jan.17.01 there are no charges, (2) every
customer is allowed to buy from an ESP a % of their load equal to the amount
served by Utility Retained Generation (not CDWR purchases) with no charges,
(3) after the effective date, any customer that buys from the electric
utility and wants to switch must pay "to ensure satisfaction of any power
purchase obligation or bond obligation incurred by the department" with the
following constraints - (a) for res and small commercial customers, if DA
load is less than load growth or (b) to self gen customers, if the customer
has given 180 days prior notification or (c) if the customer has given DWR 12
months' advance written notice (then only a fee equal to 12 months
unavoidable costs).  The CPUC has 30 days from the effective date to notify
customers of their obligations.

The Battin bill would ... still reviewing

CPUC DECISIONS IMPACTING THIS

May 5 Order - DA doesn't pay current DWR expenses.  Good for bypass of these
costs.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	"John Heisey" <jcheisey@tecoenergy.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Wednesday, November 14, 2001 11:37 AM
To:	Forney, John M.; Sara.Meyers@mirant.com
Subject:	Fwd: Frontera/TPS Hourly Desk Contacts

Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 12:25:31 -0500
From: "John Heisey" <jcheisey@tecoenergy.com>
Cc: "Jerry Watson" <jmwatson@tecoenergy.com>,	"Kenneth Parker" <kbparker@tecoenergy.com>,	"Michael Trobaugh" <mjtrobaugh@tecoenergy.com>,	"Stephanie Mchargue" <slmchargue@tecoenergy.com>
Subject: Frontera/TPS Hourly Desk Contacts
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=_AFF56BA5.2D4C6401"

Attached is a list of the Hourly Desk contacts for the Frontera plant.  Please use the main phone number for all Frontera communications.  The voicemail number can be used for non-urgent messages.  In addition, home and cell numbers are provided in case of emergency.  Thanks.

John

 - TPS Hourly Desk Contact List.doc


EnronOnline
Trade Counts and Volume for May 16, 2001
			EXTERNAL		INTERNAL		TOTAL
COUNTRY	COMMODITY	CATEGORY	COUNT	QTY	COUNT	QTY	COUNT	QTY	UNIT OF MEASURE
Austria	Power	Physical	            11 	                  9,968 	             -   	                        -   	        11 	             9,968 	MWh
Belgium	Natural Gas	Physical	              6 	              785,000 	             -   	                        -   	          6 	         785,000 	MMBtu
Canada	Natural Gas	Financial	              2 	           1,370,000 	             -   	                        -   	          2 	      1,370,000 	MMBtu
Canada	Natural Gas	Physical	          250 	           6,444,907 	             -   	                        -   	      250 	      6,444,907 	MMBtu
Canada	Power	Financial	              5 	                     636 	              1 	                       24 	          6 	                660 	MWh (Canada)
Germany	Coal	Physical	              3 	                       27 	             -   	                        -   	          3 	                  27 	SECA Contract - Metric Tonnes
Germany	Power	Physical	            73 	           1,075,260 	             -   	                        -   	        73 	      1,075,260 	MWh
Netherlands	Power	Physical	              3 	                  1,171 	             -   	                        -   	          3 	             1,171 	MWh
Norway	Power	Financial	            18 	              419,400 	             -   	                        -   	        18 	         419,400 	MWh
Singapore	Crude	Financial	              1 	                50,000 	              1 	                50,000 	          2 	         100,000 	Barrel
Singapore	Oil Products	Financial	              2 	                20,000 	             -   	                        -   	          2 	           20,000 	metric tonnes
Switzerland	Power	Physical	            16 	                22,140 	             -   	                        -   	        16 	           22,140 	MWh
United Kingdom	Crude	Financial	            11 	              520,000 	              1 	                25,000 	        12 	         545,000 	Barrel
United Kingdom	LPG	Financial	              1 	                  2,000 	             -   	                        -   	          1 	             2,000 	mt
United Kingdom	Metals	Financial	          632 	                16,725 	            71 	                     125 	      703 	           16,850 	LME Registered mt Lot
United Kingdom	Natural Gas	Physical NBP	            89 	         12,939,600 	              2 	              247,500 	        91 	    13,187,100 	MMBtu
United Kingdom	Oil Products	Financial	              9 	                50,500 	             -   	                        -   	          9 	           50,500 	IPE mt
United Kingdom	Petchems	Financial	              2 	                  2,000 	             -   	                        -   	          2 	             2,000 	mt
United Kingdom	Power	Physical	            16 	              903,840 	             -   	                        -   	        16 	         903,840 	MWh
USA	Crude	Financial	          213 	           9,845,000 	          107 	           4,845,000 	      320 	    14,690,000 	Barrel
USA	Crude	Financial Option	              6 	              300,000 	             -   	                        -   	          6 	         300,000 	Barrel
USA	Crude	Physical	              6 	              423,000 	             -   	                        -   	          6 	         423,000 	Barrel
USA	Emissions	Physical	              4 		             -   		          4 	                   -   	Emission allowance
USA	Gas Pipeline Capacity	Physical	              1 	                10,000 	             -   	                        -   	          1 	           10,000 	MMBtu
USA	LPG	Financial	              4 	                95,000 	             -   	                        -   	          4 	           95,000 	Gallon
USA	LPG	Physical	              1 	                  5,000 	             -   	                        -   	          1 	             5,000 	Gallon
USA	Metals	Physical	              1 	                       40 	             -   	                        -   	          1 	                  40 	COMEX Physical Copper Lots
USA	Natural Gas	Financial	       1,190 	       518,925,650 	          649 	       239,099,683 	   1,839 	  758,025,333 	MMBtu
USA	Natural Gas	Financial Option	            25 	         22,810,000 	              7 	           7,000,000 	        32 	    29,810,000 	MMBTU
USA	Natural Gas	Physical	       1,947 	         21,865,771 	            36 	              204,418 	   1,983 	    22,070,189 	MMBtu
USA	Oil Products	Financial	            36 	           1,020,000 	             -   	                        -   	        36 	      1,020,000 	Barrel
USA	Paper	Physical	              2 	                       48 	             -   	                        -   	          2 	                  48 	Short Tons (+/- 5%)
USA	Petchems	Financial	              3 	                50,000 	             -   	                        -   	          3 	           50,000 	Gallon
USA	Power	Financial	            51 	              336,042 	            15 	              101,108 	        66 	         437,150 	MWh
USA	Power	Physical	          546 	           7,503,204 	          179 	           4,686,582 	      725 	    12,189,786 	MWh
USA	Rate and Currency	Financial	             -   	                        -   	              5 	           6,603,772 	          5 	      6,603,772 	EUR/1
USA	Rate and Currency	Financial	             -   	                        -   	              2 	           5,000,000 	          2 	      5,000,000 	FX USD
USA	Rate and Currency	Financial	             -   	                        -   	              1 	              600,000 	          1 	         600,000 	GBP/1
USA	Rate and Currency	Financial	             -   	                        -   	              2 	           1,300,000 	          2 	      1,300,000 	USD/1
USA	Weather	Financial	              2 	                         5 	             -   	                        -   	          2 	                    5 	Cooling Degree Day
			       5,188 		       1,079 		   6,267


JCharlton@nyiso.com writes to the NYISO_TECH_EXCHANGE Discussion List:

To Special Case Resource ICAP Suppliers:

In accordance with Section 4.4.7 of the NYISO Installed Capacity Manual
(ICAP Manual), Special Case Resources are required to submit their
Operating Data for each event in which they were requested to curtail load.
The data is to be submitted in the format shown in Figure 2 of Attachment K
in the ICAP Manual.  For purposes of reporting, there were 5 events called
as follows:
|--------+------------------+--------------------+------------------+---------------------------------|
|Event # |       Date       |     Begin Time     |     End Time     |Remarks                          |
|--------+------------------+--------------------+------------------+---------------------------------|
|   0    |   Aug. 6, 2001   |      1:00 PM       |     5:00 PM      |Notice given 8/6, Response was   |
|        |                  |                    |                  |voluntary                        |
|--------+------------------+--------------------+------------------+---------------------------------|
|   1    |   Aug. 7, 2001   |      3:00 PM       |     7:00 PM      |24-hour notice 8/6, 2-hour notice|
|        |                  |                    |                  |8/7                              |
|--------+------------------+--------------------+------------------+---------------------------------|
|   2    |   Aug. 8, 2001   |      1:00 PM       |     5:00 PM      |24-hour notice 8/7, 2-hour notice|
|        |                  |                    |                  |8/8                              |
|--------+------------------+--------------------+------------------+---------------------------------|
|   3    |   Aug. 9, 2001   |      11:00 AM      |     7:00 PM      |24-hour notice 8/8, 2-hour notice|
|        |                  |                    |                  |8/9                              |
|--------+------------------+--------------------+------------------+---------------------------------|
|   4    |  Aug. 10, 2001   |      1:30 PM       |     6:00 PM      |24-hour notice 8/9, 2-hour notice|
|        |                  |                    |                  |8/10 for Zones F, G, H,  I, J, K,|
|        |                  |                    |                  |only                             |
|--------+------------------+--------------------+------------------+---------------------------------|


Most recent (but not final) Turbopark/GE contract.  More to come...

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/13/2000 02:06
PM ---------------------------

"Thompson, Peter J." <peterthompson@akllp.com> on 11/13/2000 01:27:59 PM
To: "Kay Mann (E-mail)" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc: "Pipitone, Paul" <paulpipitone@akllp.com>, "Cobb, Christopher"
<christophercobb@akllp.com>

Subject: Gas Turbine Purchase Agreement.DOC

 <<Gas Turbine Purchase Agreement.DOC>>

Sorry for the delay.  Here is the most recent draft of the GE Turbine
Agreement.  I will send the blackline shortly (I hope).
 - Gas Turbine Purchase Agreement.DOC


Steve,

This email is to notify Columbia Gas Transmission of Enron North America's intention to exercise our right of first refusal for the subject contracts.  By this notification, Enron does not agree to continue the agreements beyond the current expiration date or match the highest value bid in any subsequent auction.  If you have any questions concerning this notification, please feel free to call me at (713) 853 - 7276.

Thanks for your help,

John


Mark:

I am the writer that is developing the online help guide for the EnronOnIine
system.  I work for Dave Forster.  Dave wanted to make sure that you have an
opportunity to review the online help guide before we go live.  My
understanding is that you have access to the test web.  The work in progress
help guide is on the website but is by no means a finished product; it
changes as screens and labels change.  Are you currently reviewing the online
help or do I need to advise you when it is considered final?  Please let me
know if you have a preferred way of reviewing this sort of thing. Thanks,

Laura J


---------------------- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 01/25/2000 04:46 PM
---------------------------

	From:  Mark Taylor                           01/24/2000 03:36 PM

To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Aquilia

It never ends.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 01/24/2000 03:35
PM ---------------------------

	Kathryn Cordes
	01/24/2000 03:30 PM

To: Bob Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R
Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Forster/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Aquilia

Bob:

This communication is to keep everyone informed of the back office issues
related to EOL trades with Aquilia

The Aquilia office (Aquilia Energy) in Omaha contacted our Settlements team
regarding the EOL day deals(invoices) stating that they were not Aquilia
Energy or Aquilia Risk Deals but rather Aquilia Southwest deals.  Aquilia
Southwest is not approved for EOL trading.  To ensure timely payment,
Settlements faxed all the invoices to the San Antonio office and have been
notified that payment for these invoices to Aquilia Energy and Aquilia Risk
will be made by Aquilia Southwest.  Aquilia wanted us to change the
counterparty to Aquilia Southwest but it was explained to them that these
were EOL deals and the counterparty would not be changed.

Scott Mills provided a query of Jan. EOL deals to (just for Texas business)
Settlements to help them gauge and anticipate potential counterparty issues.

Settlements might be able to have another billing address set up for Aquilia
Energy with the address being the San Antonio office in order to minimize the
effort to getting the invoices to the correct office.

I have not heard anything more regarding an assignment processes for Aquilia
Risk/Energy and would like to know were that stands.  I would like
clarification about Aquilia Risk having credit approval taken away for
Physical deals.

Thanks,
KC


Rob,

John is currently evaluating the current HR list for Commercial Managers,
Directors and VP's that are eligible for bonus.

Please review the list below of these commercial employees that report up to
you, directly or indirectly, and let him know if you see any discrepancies.

Your prompt response would be appreciated.

Thank you,

Kim
x30681

Derek Davies  Director
Barry Tycholiz  Director
Paul Devries  Director
Jeff Borg  Director
Eric Le Dain  Director
Cyntia Di Stefano Manager
Kyle Kitagawa  VP
Duncan Croasdale Manager
William Greenizan Manager
Dean Drodziak  Manager
Howard Sangwine Manager
Garrett Tripp  Manager
Jan Wilson  Manager