I agree with her to some extent from an IT standpoint  -- we are having trouble getting Anthony to focus on some of the smaller issues when he is so focused on the Power and Genesys sytems, but he has been accommodating today

Need to update you on our offsite yesterday  -- and some good "ah -ha's " that Anthony finally had.  He is a hard IT person to work with (similar to Beth ) in that they think they know exactly what you do and what you need, and it is very hard to convince them of anything else.  We made some good progress yesterday.

Will update you on this RAC situation at our meeting this afternoon

RAC does not have all the facts here (not surprising) although we produce a pathetic little report around this which probably does not explain all of the facts

A 5000 backlog can crop up in a matter of 1 week

I will call Bill Bradford as soon as I have assembled all of the facts

B

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Beck, Sally
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 10:51 AM
To:	Apollo, Beth
Subject:	FW: EES Weekly Status

SInce your name was not on the original list, I am forwarding this to you.

Molly's comment that "many lack the clear understanding ..." in the third paragraph below - to whom does this apply and do you agree with her?  --Sally

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Harris, Molly
Sent:	Tuesday, November  13, 2001 9:54 AM
To:	Bradford, William S.; Vasan, Sue; Slaughter, Chris; Mihalik, Teresa; Holzer, Erich; Power, Keith E.; Furey, Denise; Brackett, Debbie R.
Cc:	Mills, Scott; Beck, Sally; Stubbs, Shelly; Albrecht, Kristin; Scribner, James
Subject:	RE: EES Weekly Status

Bill

This problem is stemming from the volume in Mass Market as you know.  As a result, significantly more new transactions are being booked to "New Counterpart"  than can be cleaned up from historical deals.  As Credit has been emphasizing for some months now, this is not acceptable for this business, is not maintainable (proof in the attached report) and IT resources are required to automate current manual processes.

Global Counterparty is testing their new process to automate the set up of new counterparts in GCP such that the GCP ID may also be returned to EES in conjunction with our credit response prior to booking (expected delivery next Monday0.   However, the risk system batch process specifically for RPS must be enhanced to automatically create the counterpart and accept the GCP ID.  Efforts are finally underway to this end and are expected to be tested within the week.  Then, downstream processing through to billing may benefit.

Many lack the clear understanding that it has taken not only GCP to set up the counterpart in Global Counterpart but also Deal Capture to establish and map the counterpart in RPS and RGS (both have been manual procesess, the latter severly under resourced).

Once this is implemented, EES has over 20,000 Mass Market transactions executed now, so efforts need to continue to clean up this backlog.  More importantly, three companies have already filed bankruptcy.  We must complete these efforts to manage the portfolio and respond to these events.

Regards
Molly

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bradford, William S.
Sent:	Monday, November 12, 2001 3:33 PM
To:	Vasan, Sue; Harris, Molly; Slaughter, Chris; Mihalik, Teresa; Holzer, Erich; Power, Keith E.; Furey, Denise; Brackett, Debbie R.
Cc:	Mills, Scott; Beck, Sally; Stubbs, Shelly
Subject:	RE: EES Weekly Status

This is totally unacceptable.  Is there any focus on cleaning this up?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Vasan, Sue
Sent:	Monday, November 12, 2001 3:31 PM
To:	Harris, Molly; Slaughter, Chris; Mihalik, Teresa; Holzer, Erich; Power, Keith E.; Furey, Denise; Brackett, Debbie R.; Bradford, William S.
Subject:	EES Weekly Status

Big jump in the number of New Counterparties.  Up by 5,420 new counterparties.

 << File: EES Cpty Stats.xls >>


I feel like Erik.  No one will answer my question.

-----Original Message-----
From: chad knipe [mailto:knipe3@msn.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 2:49 PM
To: Chet Fenner; Brian Constantine; EriK Wollam; Brad Corrier; c.r.zander@att.net; Joe.Parks@bridgeline.net; lawfeder@msn.com
Subject: Re: man night again?

sh"IN" - dig.......get it?  aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhh

----- Original Message -----
From: Fenner, Chet
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 5:11 PM
To: 'chad knipe'; Brian Constantine; EriK Wollam; Brad Corrier; Fenner, Chet; c.r.zander@att.net; Joe.Parks@bridgeline.net; lawfeder@msn.com
Subject: RE: man night again?

Where is this shin-dig?

-----Original Message-----
From: chad knipe [mailto:knipe3@msn.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 6:23 AM
To: Brian Constantine; EriK Wollam; Brad Corrier; Chet Fenner; c.r.zander@att.net; Joe.Parks@bridgeline.net; lawfeder@msn.com
Subject: Re: man night again?

in.

----- Original Message -----
From: Brian Constantine
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 8:26 AM
To: Erik Wollam; bcorrier@cox-internet.com; knipe3@msn.com; chet_fenner@bmc.com; c.r.zander@att.net; Joe.Parks@bridgeline.net; lawfeder@msn.com
Subject: RE: man night again?

I am IN!!! Would like to be there by 6:30 or so...maybe later. Zander is "out"...unless he brings Jake. Someone forward to Chambers...you know he's in.

BC

-----Original Message-----
From: Erik Wollam [mailto:erwollam@hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 5:25 PM
To: bcorrier@cox-internet.com; knipe3@msn.com; chet_fenner@bmc.com; c.r.zander@att.net; Joe.Parks@bridgeline.net; Brian Constantine; lawfeder@msn.com
Subject: man night again?

Zero response from my last effort on this matter. Are your emails working
men?

Zander called and suggested we attend the CCA crawfish boil function to be
held Thurday May 2, 2002. Reasonably priced event, beer, mud bugs and we can
sit back and watch pig win raffle prizes.

I'm in

e.

_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com


FYI.  From yesterday's editorial page in the WSJ. McFadden's one of the folks
that signed the "manifesto."

Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 02/14/2001 09:02 AM -----

	Elizabeth Linnell
	02/14/2001 08:17 AM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: WSJ

California Needs Deregulation Done Right
By Daniel McFadden

02/13/2001
The Wall Street Journal
A26
(Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)

The electricity market in California has swung over its history from
monopolization by industrialists in its early days to comprehensive
regulation, then to partial deregulation in the 1990s, and now back toward
substantial regulation and government intervention. In the past, each swing
of the pendulum came from public frustration with the way this market
operated, and each produced a result that the public again found
unsatisfactory.
But the memory of politicians and the public is short. The state is poised to
repeat the mistakes of the last cycle of regulation. Measures passed by the
California Legislature this month are an ill-conceived intervention that will
lock the state into high energy costs and put it at a competitive
disadvantage for years to come.
Unless there is further action, the state will maintain subsidized retail
prices that discourage conservation, while capping in-state wholesale prices
in a manner that discourages construction of new in-state generation capacity
and leaves Californians at the mercy of out-of-state generators. Government
subsidization of electricity consumption will drain tax revenues that might
be better used for education and other needs, encumber California's children
with debt to pay the state's energy bills, and threaten the state's future
ability to sell bonds for public projects. The immediate political cost of
consumer outrage from higher electricity rates may be postponed, but the real
economic cost promises to be massive.
The sad thing is that this is all unnecessary.
The source of the crisis was rigid regulation of retail prices in the face of
rapid increases in wholesale prices driven by increased fuel prices and
increased demand in the national electricity market. The only effective
solution to the crisis is to make retail price regulation more flexible, so
that consumers see the real economic cost of electricity and respond to high
prices through conservation efforts that reduce demand and push prices down.
On the supply side, the state should encourage construction of new in-state
generation capacity through the right market signals, giving producers the
opportunity to site plants and sell power under conditions comparable to
other states.
It's true that state action was needed to stabilize the electricity market,
avoid immediate bankruptcy of the distribution companies, and assure
continued delivery of energy. But this step will only postpone the day of
reckoning unless sensible electricity pricing is introduced as well.
To limit the impact of high prices on the poor, increasing block-rate tariffs
can be used in which the rates for "lifeline" electricity use are kept low.
These were effective in limiting demand for water during California's last
drought, and are already used to promote energy conservation. A more
aggressive version that pushes the rates in high-usage blocks to the real
load-linked economic cost of electricity would provide an incentive that
would stimulate conservation at the precise points that will do the most to
moderate demand and push down wholesale prices.
Consumers should have the opportunity to hedge against price spikes and
average their payments to ease the pain of price volatility. The installation
of load-sensitive meters should be accelerated so that consumers can respond
to the economic price of the electricity they are consuming. This is new
technology for U.S. utilities, but has operated well in France for years.
On the supply side, the state and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
could use their regulatory power to require that existing generators redirect
excess profits to finance lifeline rates for retail customers and work off
the hangover from previous electricity purchased and not paid for.
However, care should be taken in dealing with generators to assure that every
kilowatt hour that any generation facility can produce at less than the
national wholesale price of electricity is in fact delivered to the market.
The state needs to be very cautious about getting into the power business as
an intermediary between generators and distributors. Government bureaucracies
rarely show dexterity in dealing with private suppliers, and access to
general government revenues dulls their incentive to operate efficiently.
Negotiating long-term contracts right now, when California is in a weak
market position and the out-of-state generators are in the driver's seat, is
likely to put the state at a future competitive disadvantage.
Consumers need to be reminded that money passed through the government to
subsidize electricity comes out of their pockets just as surely as price
increases, without the mitigating benefits of demand reduction.The lessons of
history suggest that in making the Hobson's choice between a dysfunctional
partially deregulated market and a fully-regulated one that promises to be
even more dysfunctional, California is picking the greater of the two evils.
If it fails to move to sensible electricity pricing in which both consumers
and suppliers see the real economic price at the margin, it will face
another, even more serious crisis in the not too distant future.
---
Mr. McFadden, a professor of economics at the University of California,
Berkeley, received the Nobel Prize in Economics last year.

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.


---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 09/29/2000 09:44 AM
---------------------------

Bryan Hull
11/19/99 01:08 PM
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Busted

---------------------- Forwarded by Bryan Hull/HOU/ECT on 11/19/99 01:08 PM
---------------------------

	Enron Capital Management

	From:  David Baumbach                           10/08/99 01:15 PM

To: Bryan Hull/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael Walters/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric
Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT, O'Neal D Winfree/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Busted

Don't try this at home...

 - BUSTED.WAV


Our discussion session w/ Ken Raisler on the CFMA is scheduled for 1 to 3
p.m. Monday, March 5th in Sandalwood Rooms A & B at the downtown Hyatt
Regency Hotel.

Does anybody have any input/suggestions/requests on topics to be covered?  If
so, please reply by e-mail.  Thanks -- Bob

Robert E. Bruce
Senior Counsel
Enron North America Corp.
T (713) 345-7780
F (713) 646-3393
robert.bruce@enron.com


canary (kuh-NAR-ee) noun

   1. A small finch (Serinus canaria) native to the Canary Islands that is
      greenish to yellow and has long been bred as a cage bird.

   2. A woman singer. An informer; a stool pigeon.

   3. A sweet white wine from the Canary Islands, similar to Madeira.

   4. A lively 16th-century court dance.

   5. A light to moderate or vivid yellow color.

[French canari, from Spanish canario, of the Canary Islands, from (Islas)
Canarias, Canary (Islands), from Late Latin Canariae (Insulae), (islands)
of dogs, from Latin canarius, pertaining to dogs, canine, from canis, dog.]

   "Other Hollywood illuminati have denounced Mr. Kazan for his supposed
   treachery; a newspaper columnist describes him as `the most famous
   canary of the Cold War'."
   Geoffrey Wheatcroft, The Waterfront All Over Again,
   The Wall Street Journal, Mar 19, 1999.

This week's theme: animal words that are used figuratively.

............................................................................
In the midst of great joy, do not promise anyone anything. In the midst of
great anger, do not answer anyone's letter. -Chinese proverb

Q: What is your privacy policy?
A: AWAD mailing list addresses are never sold, rented, leased, traded,
   swapped, marketed, exchanged or bartered to anyone. We don't like to
   receive junk mail, and know you don't either.

Pronunciation:
http://wordsmith.org/words/canary.wav
http://wordsmith.org/words/canary.ram


Please notice the individual assignments.  Let me know if you have any
questions or concerns.

Thanks - Jeff


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Enron General Announcements
Sent:	Wednesday, January 30, 2002 10:51 AM
To:	DL-GA-all_domestic
Subject:	Enron Conference Call Today, 11:00am CST

Steve Cooper, Jeff McMahon and Ray Bowen will hold a conference call for media today at 11:00am CST.  Employees will be able to listen to the call by logging onto the following website.

Click on the link to access the call:  http://www.corporate-ir.net/ireye/ir_site.zhtml?ticker=ene&script=2400


Can set up a conference call with me and Remi Cologne in Brazil this week.  Also, what happen to Manu.


Peter,

 Tell Hellman if I snowboard like a girl then he skies like my grandmother !!

      Rob


Slow browser may need to wait 15 seconds for your email to appear, then scroll to view.
mailto:leave-enerfaxdaily-797747T@relay.netatlantic.com
to unsubscribe enerfaxdaily as: lindy.donoho@enron.com forward to web@enerfax.com

If your email does not support this web
version, please subscribe to the free text version by writing subscribe@enerfax.com
Please visit our website to view today's gas and power prices and news by
clicking http://www.enerfax.com

If you received this in error or no longer wish to subscribe click this link mailto:leave-enerfaxdaily-797747T@relay.netatlantic.com or forward to web@enerfax.com


print
----- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 02/07/2001 11:08 AM -----

	Mark Tawney/ENRON@enronXgate
	02/07/2001 10:43 AM

		 To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: International Employees working on Weather

London:  Ross McIntyre

Oslo:  Bjarne Shieldrop
  Didrik Thrane-Nielsen
  Frank Lien
  Oystein Rognes
  There may be a couple of others part-time.

Sydney: Raymond Yeow
  Christian Werner

Tokyo:  Morten Erik Petersen
  Takuro Shioda


Doug,

We were trying to get everybody together for today
but with no luck.  Wednesday next week is the first feasible
date.

Sorry for that.

Vince

Doug Arnell@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
08/29/2000 01:59 PM
To: Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski@ECT
Subject: Re: LNG "Book" Meeting

I'm assuming that this meeting is tomorrow (wednesday the 30th) not next
wednesday.

Shirley Crenshaw@ECT
08/29/2000 09:06 AM
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Groves/HOU/ECT@ECT, doug.arnell@enron.com,
Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: LNG "Book" Meeting

 Hello everyone:

The next LNG "Book" meeting has been scheduled for Wednesday,
September 6 at 2:00 pm in EB19C2.

Thanks!

Shirley Crenshaw
3-5290


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 12/19/2000
02:49 PM ---------------------------

"John D. Martin" <J_Martin@baylor.edu> on 12/19/2000 12:46:59 PM
To: vkamins@enron.com
cc:
Subject: New documents

Vince,

here's the latest set of interview notes as well as the latest "version" of
the paper.  I will be working more this afternoon (if I can) and send an
updated version.

Talk to you later tomorrow or Friday.

John

 - Enron Transformation Paper12_17_00.doc
 - EnronInterviewNotes.doc

John D. Martin
Carr P. Collins Chair in Finance
Finance Department
Baylor University
PO Box 98004
Waco, TX 76798
254-710-4473 (Office)
254-710-1092 (Fax)
J_Martin@Baylor.edu
web:    http://hsb.baylor.edu/html/martinj/home.html


Most of these are the wrong people, but they should be able to get you to the
right person.  I need to chat with the other desk to get the rest of the
names.

Tennessee  Toni Garcia  713-420-3663
Texas Eastern  Stephanie Spencer  713-627-5025
Transco  David Schoellkopf  713-215-4625
Panhandle
NGPL
Northern
El Paso
CIG
Northwest (Williams)
KR (Kern) (Williams)
ANR
Trunkline
SONAT   Jerry Nelson  205-325-7257
Transcanada

Clayton Vernon@ENRON
02/29/2000 04:31 PM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: HMM

Chris-

Can I get names and telephone numbers at:

Tennessee
Texas Eastern
Transco
Panhandle
NGPL
Northern
El Paso
CIG
Northwest (Williams)
KR (Kern) (Williams)
ANR
Trunkline
SONAT

of guys who could give me their FT and IT charges, peak and off-peak, going
back  (gulp) 4  years. You know,  guys who are cool with Enron and/or your
name, if I drop it.

Clay


UNITED STATES		LONDON - password is ene!cp

Sorry for the delay,
Stephanie
3-9283


Please click below for access to the weekly reports. Click on whichever report you are interested in and you should be able to view both reports. Remember to refresh your browser.

http://gpgdomino.ots.enron.com/QuickPlace/ferc/Main.nsf/h_Toc/A275772365A239B286256A3F006CB023?OpenDocument

For those preferring a word document, the Weekly Regulatory and Legislative Affairs Report is attached.


Gerald,

Jim Osborne asked that I pass on this Williams - NWPL contact:

Steve Kofoed
801-584-7226
801-584-7076 (fax)

Mark


How about the 24th and 31st pick for the 13th?


I put Storey for all of Ruscitti's products.

DG

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Keiser, Kam
Sent:	Monday, January 28, 2002 1:31 PM
To:	Love, Phillip M.; Winfree, O'Neal D.; Palmer, B. Scott; Giron, Darron C.
Subject:	EOL products

Now that we know which traders will be moving over, or we should, we need to make a second pass at the EOL product list.  Can you confirm with your desk heads that the list of names we have is correct, and then update the product mappings by tomorrow afternoon?

O:\erms\erms_adm\netco\controls\Trader-Book template (US Gas)_EOL new books.xls

Thanks

KK


Patricia:  I was just checking to see if you have had an opportunity to
review our ISDA Schedule for the referenced entities.  Please let me know if
you have any questions.  I believe that Susan Flynn in our office faxed you a
copy of our form of Schedule last week. I look forward to hearing from you.
Regards.  Sara


PLEASE TRY TO GET YOUR TIMESHEETS TO ME BY THURSDAY AFTERNOON.

Joanne Rozycki
Senior Administrative Assistant
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB3880D
Houston, TX  77002
Phone:  (713) 853-5968     Fax:      (713) 646-3490
Email:   joanne.rozycki@enron.com


fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Neal/HOU/ECT on 01/23/2001 04:40 PM
---------------------------

Scott Goodell@ENRON
01/23/2001 01:53 PM
To: Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Transco - EBB Notice: Terrebonne Plant Restart January 18, 2001

FYI

---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Goodell/Corp/Enron on 01/23/2001
12:56 PM ---------------------------

"CustomerNotices, WGPHOU" <WGPHOU.CustomerNotices@Williams.com> on 01/22/2001
04:08:03 PM
To:
cc:

Subject: Transco - EBB Notice: Terrebonne Plant Restart January 18, 2001

Media Inquiries: Chris Stockton
                 (713) 215-2010
Other Inquiries: Transit Help Line
                 Outside 713 Area Code: 1-800-248-0404
                 Inside 713 Area Code: 215-3371
Date:   January 22, 2001

To:     All Producers and Shippers Utilizing Transco's North
        Terrebonne Plant

From:   Dan McVay

Re:     EBB Notice:  Terrebonne Plant Restart January 18, 2001

The North Terrebonne Gas Processing Plant resumed operations
effective January 18, 2001.  The plant has begun processing
committed plant owner and third party gas production.

If there are any questions, please contact the following:

Contract Administration:     Clayton Phelps   (713) 215-2653

WILLIAMS FIELD SERVICES COMPANY,
As Agent for Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation

Dan McVay
Director, Commercial Operations
Gulf Coast

--------------------------ADDITIONAL X12 INFORMATION------------------------
Trans. Svc. Provider: 007933021 - TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE CORPORATION
   Notice Identifier: L0101222
     Critical Notice: No
      Type of Notice: 6-Other
   Required Response: 5-No Response Required
   Resp By Date/Time: N/A
Notice Eff Date/Time: 01/22/01 16:02:37
Notice End Date/Time: N/A
              Status: 2-Supersede
 Prior Notice Ident.: L0101221
____________________________________________________________________________

 - C.DTF


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 10/09/2000
11:03 AM ---------------------------

Vince J Kaminski
10/09/2000 10:56 AM
To:
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Fwd: hello from Charles Shen at Williams Co.

Toni,

I would like to bring two people for an interview

One of them sent me a message that is attached below.
I am including the info about the 2nd gentleman below.

I would like to include myself, Vasant Shnabhogue, Tanya Tamarchenko
Stinson Gibner, Zimin Lu, Paulo Issler,  Alex Tang on the interview list.

It would be great if we could bring them this week on Friday. Tanya
will be at a training course next week. This means that if Friday this week
is too aggressive,
we should shoot for interviews in 2 weeks.

Sorry for a short notice.

Vince

Jermakyan, Martin
410 Brightmore Downs
Alpharetta, GA 30005
Phone: (770) 753-9341 (h)
 (404) 402-8957 (c)
martin@electraparners.com

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 10/09/2000
09:48 AM ---------------------------

VKaminski@aol.com on 10/07/2000 05:55:11 PM
To: vkamins@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Fwd: hello from Charles Shen at Williams Co.

Return-Path: <charlesshen8@yahoo.com>
Received: from  rly-zc02.mx.aol.com (rly-zc02.mail.aol.com [172.31.33.2]) by
air-zc02.mail.aol.com (v76_r1.8) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Oct 2000 13:43:33 -0400
Received: from  web9407.mail.yahoo.com (23.0/24.129.136.216.in-addr.arpa
[216.136.129.23]) by rly-zc02.mx.aol.com (v75_b3.9) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Oct
2000 13:43:06 -0400
Message-ID: <20001004174302.95070.qmail@web9407.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [151.142.252.11] by web9407.mail.yahoo.com; Wed, 04 Oct 2000
10:43:02 PDT
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 10:43:02 -0700 (PDT)
From: Charles Shen <charlesshen8@yahoo.com>
Subject: hello from Charles Shen at Williams Co.
To: vkamins@ect.enron.com
Cc: vkaminski@aol.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Unknown

Dear Vince:

How are you? I am not sure whether you still remember
me, we met in a conference last year in Houston. After
having been working for Williams for about two years,
now I am ready to make a move. I have heard Enron is a
great company, I am wondering whether there is any
opportunity for me, either in research group or in
structure group

Here is brief description about myself: Right after I
got my Ph.D. on finance and econometrics from Duke
University in 1998, I joined Williams Energy Trading
company as a Quantitative Analyst. Now I am Lead Quant
and in charge of the quantitative research group with
7 highly talented people. I have done extensive
research and modeling about electricity,
load-following deal and tolling deals.

If you need any additional information, please feel
free to call me at 918-409-4308. I look forward to
hearing from you soon, thank you.

sincerely,
Charles

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Photos - 35mm Quality Prints, Now Get 15 Free!
http://photos.yahoo.com/


TP1 sold 2000 dth to the New England book for November via EOL.  The price is NX1 + .445.  The point should be South Commack.  As of 10:44 am this deal had not loaded into Sitara for November.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Whalan, Jubran
Sent:	Monday, January 29, 2001 5:00 PM
To:	Lavorato, John J.; Black, Don
Cc:	Benevides, Dennis; Bresnan, Neil
Subject:	Revised EES-ENA CA Book


Group,
Just a quick reminder.  We have a meeting April 11 at 4:30 in the afternoon.
We will review ytd performance of the group, areas where we are doing well,
and areas for improviement.  Please bring your thoughts and material to take
notes.  We will also have a couple Hot Lips Pizzas again.

Additionally, I have not heard from all of you regarding the class on April
27th and 28th.
The course is Electric System Operation for the Non-engineer.  The course
highlights include:
Generation
Transmission and Overhead
Distribution Systems
Underground Distribution
Switchgear
Voltage Control
Matching Generation

The course will purportedly provide a comprehensive understanding of system
operations including fossil fuel, hydro and nuclear generation, transmission
and distribution.  The course should provide not only technical information
but also economics of operation, system and equipment protection and safety.

If I have not heard from you by Noon on the 11th, I will assume that you are
not interested.
Thanks,

Bill


Please join us for a celebration of Energy Operations promotions, hosted by
ENA Energy Operations Management Team.  The following people will be honored
at Irma's (22 N. Chenevert @ Franklin) on Thursday, February 3, 2000 from
5:30 pm - 7:30 pm.

 Brent Price  Kristin Albrecht   Brenda Herod
 Leslie Reeves  Mary Solmonson  Scott Pleus
 Sheri Thomas  Bennett Kaufman  Richard McKeel
 John Postlewaite Sylvia Campos   Kam Keiser
 Phillip Love  Anthony Campos  Kori Loibl
 Trang Le  Donnie Vinson   Imelda Frayre
 Amy Degeyter  Michael Nguyen  Sherlyn Schumack
 Karie Hastings  Leslie Smith

Please RSVP by Friday, January 31 to Patti at ext. 39106 or e-mail reply.
Directions will be available Monday at Patti's desk (3012f).
Hope to see you there!


can you get me the number of our contact at the Delano.  I have a personal favor to ask them.
john


The report named: VaR and Peak Position Report By Trader <http://erv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=22&report_name=VaR+and+Peak+Position+Report+By+Trader&category_cd=5&category_name=EAST&toc_hide=1&sTV1=5&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=10/02/2001>, published as of 10/02/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.

(Revision: 4)


Can I get a copy of the SPPC master agreement sent down to me this a.m. I
would like to review.

BT


This is getting confusing!! The counterparty to the Australian weather
derivatives will be Enron Australia, the comments and discussion is with
regards to the Japanese city weather derivatives, both OTC and on EOL.

	Susan Musch@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	07/07/00 23:26

		 To: David Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc: John Viverito/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jonathan Whitehead/AP/Enron@Enron,
Nicholas.O'Day@enron.com@ENRON, Justin
Timothy/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Raymond
Yeow/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mark Taylor@ECT
		 Subject: Re: EOL GTC's for Weather Derivatives In Australia

David,

Based on the e-mail that I sent out on June 30th (and that I have attached
below), I was under the presumption that the Enron party to the GTCs would be
Enron Australia Finance Pty Ltd.  This is because we are dealing with
Australian weather derivatives and I was presuming (right or wrong) that such
derivatives would be on the books of the Sydney trading office.  Please let
me know if this is not the case.

Best regards,
Susan

David Minns
07/06/2000 12:35 AM
To: John Viverito/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Jonathan Whitehead/AP/Enron@Enron, Nicholas.O'Day@enron.com@ENRON, Susan
Musch/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Justin
Timothy/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Raymond
Yeow/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mark Taylor@ECT

Subject: Re: EOL GTC's for Weather Derivatives In Australia

John please see attached GTCs for Australian weather. They are essentially
the same as the example that was forwarded to B&M when they got the brief to
advise on weather derivatives last month.

I understand that B & M are having second thoughts on the gambling question
and are due to come in with an advice on the point.

There is also a question as to whether the Enron party will be Enron
Australia Finance Pty. Ltd. or Enron Japan KK. From a tax perspective Susan
what would you prefer?

On a related issue what Enron company is on the Passwords Applications and
ETAs that are being sent out? Although from a legal perspective it does not
matter it may increase acceptance if it were Enron Japan KK.

From: John Viverito@ENRON on 05-07-2000 05:19 CDT
To: David Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Jonathan Whitehead/AP/Enron@Enron, Nicholas.O'Day@enron.com

Subject: EOL GTC's for Weather Derivatives In Australia

David-

Please forward an electronic copy of the EOL GTC's for weather derivatives in
Australia.  Thanks for your assistance.

Cheers,

John

Susan Musch
06/30/2000 11:30 AM
To: Jeff Blumenthal@ECT
cc: Heidi Mason/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, David
Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Stephen H Douglas@ECT, Paul
Quilkey/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT (bcc: Susan
Musch/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT)

Subject: Tax Advice on AUS and JPN CDD and HDD Weather Swaps

Below is a summary of the tax advice that I received from our outside
advisors in Tokyo and Sydney on the Sydney trading office entering into cash
settled weather derivative trades with Japanese counterparties:

Japanese Tax Advice

1. Swap, Options and Other Financial Derivative Transactions

Based on the current practice of the Japanese tax authorities, standard
swaps, options and similar financial transactions with symmetrical payment
flows should not be subject to withholding tax. However, to the extent that
Enron transactions involve asymmetrical payments, concern exists that imputed
interest from the imbedded loan could be subject to interest withholding tax.

2. Consumption Tax (VAT) and Excise Taxes

Although Japan imposes a 5% consumption tax (VAT), financial transactions are
generally not subject to the consumption tax, so cash settled derivative
transactions should generally not be subject to consumption tax.  Japan
imposes various kinds of excise taxes.  These excise taxes generally apply to
physical importation and domestic sale and delivery of covered products and
should generally not apply to purely financial derivatives transactions which
reference commodity prices.

3. Collateral for Derivatives Transactions

If Enron entities will take collateral from Japan-based customers in
connection with derivative transactions, depending upon the specific
arrangements, withholding tax liability might arise.  For example, if an
Enron trading entity takes cash collateral from a Japan-based customer and
pays interest on it, such interest payments could be subject to local
withholding tax when paid to the Japanese resident customer.

Australian Tax Advice

1. Swap, Options and Other Financial Derivative Transactions

Based on the summaries of the products attached to Justin Timothy,s June 12th
e-mail to Mario Parra Cardoso and Dale Neuner:

(1) the swap income or deduction should be recognized on a due and payable
basis (rather than on an accrual basis over the term of the swap), and
(2) there should not be any interest withholding tax imposed on the swap
payments because there does not appear to be any linkage between the swap
payment and "interest" as defined for Australian tax purposes.

Note that there is an Australian tax proposal to impose withholding tax on
other Australian source income.  Although no details are yet available, it is
expected that the Australian government will not impose withholding tax where
the income would constitute "business profits" of any entity in a treaty
country (such as Japan) which does not have permanent establishment in
Australia.  Thus, based on the current proposal, it is unlikely that such a
withholding tax, if enacted, would apply to the swap payments.  However, this
could change depending upon the rules actually enacted.

2. GST (VAT)

Effective July 1, 2000, the Goods and Services Tax ("GST") will tax at a 10%
rate the consumption of most goods and services in Australia.  (It does not
apply to consumption outside of Australia, e.g. exports.)

A swap payment to a Japanese counterparty will be GST-free. This means that
the Australian trading office would be able to claim refunds on a portion of
the GST paid on its rents and other expenses.

Please let me know if you have any questions or need any additional
information.

Best regards,
Susan


CMTA Summer Tax and Energy Conferences
Energy Keynote Speakers
FERC Commissioners Nora Brownell and William Massey
August 1-3, 2001 at South Lake Tahoe
For registration and program information, go to CMTA's website: http://www.cmta.net/archive/2001_tahoe_conference.shtml

Legislative Weekly
July 13, 2001
Issue 28, Volume 3
A weekly publication from the
California Manufacturers & Technology Association
detailing legislative and regulatory developments in Sacramento

FRIDAY THE 13TH SURPRISE FOR CALIFORNIA BUSINESSES
The budget impasse will keep lawmakers working over the weekend. In addition, a deadline looms for a vote on the Governor's Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to keep Southern California Edison (SCE) out of bankruptcy. The Assembly and Senate Democrats are making a final run at their own versions of the plan. A Senate version is still in the works, while the Assembly Energy Costs and Availability will hold an informational hearing Saturday afternoon on ABX2 82 (Keeley D-Boulder Creek). ABX2 82 currently allocates the SCE undercollection almost entirely to noncore customers (above 20kw), pays SCE two times net book value for transmission, and leaves open the possibility of a contribution from SCE above the $400 million tax refund provided in the Governors MOU. The sketchy outline of a Senate plan would impose all undercollections to noncore customers, impose a $300 million haircut to generators and an additional $800 million from SCE.
Direct access rights would be suspended under ABX2 82 until 2003 and a study would be authorized by March 31, 2002, on how to expeditiously phase in direct access for customers over 20kw (and green direct access under 20kw).
Some of California's largest businesses have already been hit with rate increases over 100%.  CMTA supports an equitable sharing of the costs of the SCE undercollection (as well as DWR contract costs) among all customer groups, and will oppose a solution to the SCE problem that unfairly shifts these costs to California businesses.

MORE OR LESS ENERGY
There seems to be no shortage of bad business bills making their way through the Legislature.  Issues range from imposing strict liability on generators that reduce or discontinue electricity generation, to subjecting generators to felony criminal penalties for making basic cost/benefit business decisions.
Generator Liability
A measure, ABX2 51 (Reyes D-Fresno), that makes an electricity generator strictly liable for any damages that are proximately caused when the generator reduces or stops generating electricity for economic reasons, passed (7-0) from the Assembly Judiciary Committee on July 3, 2001.
Since negligence and intent need not be proven in order to establish strict liability, under ABX2 51, a generator could be held strictly liable for damages that resulted if electricity supplies were curtailed when the generator was temporarily shut down to perform routine maintenance, unscheduled maintenance or due to other external business factors.  ABX2 51 also would make it difficult for a generator to permanently close a facility, even if the facility was not operating profitably.
Despite the fact that electricity shortages are driven by any number of factors within and beyond their control, ABX2 51 would result in generators shouldering all liability and responsibility for electricity shortages.
CMTA will be actively advocating against this measure before it is heard on the Assembly Floor.
Felony Fuel Shortages
ABX2 65 (Cardoza D-Merced) is a vaguely worded measure that does not explicitly identify what types of activities would be considered felonious.  The measure allows an individual or entity to be prosecuted for "creating a fuel shortage" defined as: (1) The diminution by contrivance or artificial means of any of the supply of fuel to a point below that needed to meet consumer demand;
(2) Restricting output or withholding capacity from bidding into the market; and,
(3) Economic withholding by submitting bids at prices above the producers' marginal cost.Fluctuations of in-state and out-of-state generation; maintenance of facilities; weather; customer demand; and drought are just a few of the many components that converge to impact day-to-day energy supplies. ABX2 65 does not allow for the natural swings in supply and demand which are common in a market economy, and add one more unpredictable component to the market, thus further complicating price and supply fluctuations.
In addition, the bill provides that producers only should receive marginal costs for their products.  This precept flies in the face of a free market economy.  Businesses should be able to receive a reasonable return on the products they produce and supply.  Limiting a business' profits to marginal costs only further discourages investment in the State's energy infrastructure.
Second, entities already may be prosecuted for illegal business practices, conspiracy, collusion and intentional market manipulation under the State's Cartwright Act and the Federal Sherman Anti-Trust Act, among others.  Enforcement of existing state and federal laws is sufficient to address the alleged illegal business practices the bill purports to remedy.
Third, the measure establishes that a person or entity who violates provisions of the bill is "guilty of a felony and may be punished in state prison and a fine not to exceed 10 percent of the corporation's gross corporate assets."  These fines and penalties are excessively punitive.
Fourth, the bounty-hunter provisions of the bill provide an incentive for employees and interest groups to investigate businesses for profit.  Other bounty-hunter legislation passed by the Legislature has resulted in many frivolous lawsuits.  Some of the costs associated with these suits are absorbed by businesses and some of the costs are passed on to consumers in the form of higher prices.  In any event, the bounty-hunter provisions have the potential to unnecessarily increase energy costs.  The regulatory branch of our government already has the authority to investigate alleged unfair business practices.  This authority should not be passed on to employees and interest groups.
ABX2 65 establishes a terrible precedent and has the very real potential to reduce existing energy supplies and to discourage future energy infrastructure investment within the State.
Office of Ratepayer Advocate
Following the charge of Pacific Bell, CMTA and other business lobby groups have successfully slowed the progress of SB 201 (Speier D-Hillsborough) which repeals the sunset of the Office of Ratepayer Advocate (ORA).  CMTA does not oppose the continued existence of the ORA, but is advocating against language inserted into the measure that significantly expands the ORA's authority.
The ORA has exercised broad authority to supervise and regulate utilities, arguably beyond the authority it was granted when it became a stand-alone office. While there is ample legislative history in Public Utilities Code Section 309.5 indicating that the ORA should be independent of the Commission, the PUC's full authority was not automatically extended to the ORA.
CMTA joined Pacific Bell in proposing amendments to limit the ORA's authority and to require the PUC to issue written orders when ruling on the ORA's discovery requests.  Written rulings by an Administrative Law Judge or Commissioner would provide additional information to the ORA, utilities and the public explaining the basis for decisions.
In addition, CMTA supports requiring the ORA to pursue alternative dispute resolution prior to filing a complaint.  Many courts today utilize alternative dispute resolution because it often leads to a more efficient disposition of cases.
CMTA also is supportive of extending, for five more years, the sunset in the bill that the author seeks  to repeal.  Extending the sunset will allow the Legislature to assess whether or not the original intent of the legislation has achieved its purpose.
SB 201 failed passage in Utilities and Commerce on July 9, 2001 when the author resisted  amendments to narrow and clarify provisions in the bill.  Reconsideration was granted and the measure received a necessary rule waiver to allow the bill to be heard, again, by the Utilities and Commerce Committee on July 16, 2001.

ASSEMBLY INSURANCE COMMITTEE PASSES UI BENEFITS BILL
SB 40 by Senator Richard Alarcon (D-Sylmar) passed out of the Assembly Insurance Committee on July 11 on a 10-5 partisan vote.  The bill would increase the cost of unemployment insurance (UI) to employers by more than $3.2 billion over four years and provides no systemic changes to help offset the cost.  CMTA and other employer representatives opposed the bill.
An increase in unemployment benefits is a direct payroll tax that would be funded entirely by employers.  According to the Employment Development Department's (EDD) projections, SB 40 as proposed would raise employer contributions over and above the existing rates by $160 million by 2004, given there are no changes in the unemployment rate.  Further, it is estimated that by 2005, the total employer UI tax increase would jump to $782 million, a 32 percent tax increase.  SB 40 would increase the maximum weekly benefit from the current level of $230 to $325 in 2002, to $373 in 2003, to $384 in 2004 based on state average weekly wage estimates.
The bill contains several other provisions that add costs to employers such as an alternate base period using the most recent 52 weeks of the benefit year that will allow six to eight percent more applicants to qualify for UI benefits.  This would be a new system in addition to the current quarterly reporting system and would impose a new burden on employers who would have to manually report alternate base period wage information to EDD within ten days or pay a $250 civil penalty.  It would also entitle employees who leave their job during a trade dispute caused by a reduction in wages and employees locked-out of work by the employer during a collective bargaining dispute to receive UI benefits anyway.
The federal Worker Adjustment and Renotification and Training Act (WARN) requires an employer of 100 or more employees to give at least a 60-day notice in plant closings or mass layoffs affecting 50 or more employees.  If the employer fails to provide a WARN notice, they are liable for civil damages in the amount of 60 days of back pay and benefits to each affected worker.  Some employers elect to not give the advance notice and pay the 60 days and benefits in order to avoid possible problems with product quality, equipment sabotage, poor attendance, injuries and etc.  However, the upside to this decision is that employees get 60 days in which to look for work full time with full pay and benefits.  SB 40 would allow these employees to collect UI benefits during the same 60 days.
California's UI maximum weekly benefit of $230 is the fifth lowest in the nation and has not been increased since 1992.  However, California has the most liberal eligibility requirement of any state by almost any measure and in order to maintain any reasonable control on UI cost, the historical trade-off has been workers receiving lower benefits. The above provisions are good examples of how the system can be abused and must be resisted by employers.
CMTA along with other employer representatives are in serious discussion with the proponents of SB 40 to determine how to increase the benefit level and make some modest systemic changes that will help avoid placing an undue hardship on employers.  Further discussions are being scheduled.

STORMWATER BILL PUT OVER
Late last week, Senator Kuehl's office circulated a negotiated compromise on the stormwater monitoring bill, SB 72 (Kuehl D-Santa Monica).  Based on that version, the business community and the municipalities were prepared to remove their opposition earlier this week in the Assembly Environmental Safety and Toxic Materials Committee.  However, the evening before the hearing, the bill's sponsor, Heal the Bay, circulated a new set of amendments to Committee members.  Their version deletes several sections of the bill, including carefully crafted language intended to preserve and strengthen group monitoring programs.  It also creates the potential for expanded monitoring requirements for industrial facilities.
Heal the Bay's action created an atmosphere of confusion and frustration that lead Senator Kuehl and Committee Chair Hannah-Beth Jackson to hold the bill in committee.  In all probability, a rule waiver will be secured for an August hearing in Assembly Toxics.  In the meantime, discussions will resume on Heal the Bay's proposed changes.  CMTA remains hopeful that the outstanding issues mentioned above can be resolved without sacrificing the progress achieved over several weeks of negotiation.

CMTA ADVOCATES FOR CAREER AND TECHNICAL EDUCATION FUNDING
CMTA has formally urged that $100 million dollars be allocated in the State Budget for Career and Technical Education (CTE, also known as vocational education). At the outset of this session, legislative leaders stated that CTE was one of the highest education priorities for the year.  Unfortunately, the Governor eliminated funding for CTE in the May Revise and the Budget Subcommittees subsequently funded only $10 million for an unallocated fund.
In the past decade, more than half of the career technical education programs faced closure in the Los Angeles Unified School District because of lack of funding and support; statewide, the trend has been the same.  Without new funding this year, more programs will close.   The acquisition of marketable skills in high school offers students, both those who are college bound and those who will immediately enter the workforce, the opportunity to earn high salaries and engage in meaningful careers.  CMTA continues to support legislation designed to rebuild California's CTE/vocational education system.

UPDATE ON THE CALIFORNIA ECONOMY
A recent report from the California Department of Finance confirms that the state's economy does not seem destined to repeat its extraordinary 2000 performance this year.  Employment growth slowed significantly during the first five months of 2001.  The slowdown is principally centered in the San Francisco Bay Area due to the dramatic contraction in internet-related service industries. Below are data supporting the report's conclusions:
California's employment picture has changed notably since the end of 2000.  In May, industry employment grew by 3,200 following gains of 19,400 in April and nearly 58,000 in March.  Thus far in 2001, industry employment has expanded by an average of 12,500 jobs each month compared to an average of 49,000 jobs each month in 2000.
Despite decelerating job growth, California is still the nation's growth leader.  While the state added over 3,000 jobs in May, nationally nonfarm employment fell by 19,000.  Since the beginning of the year, California has accounted for 73 percent of the nation's new nonfarm jobs.
California's unemployment rate was unchanged in May at 4.9 percent.  The rate a year ago was 5.0 percent.  While still low by state and national standards, the unemployment rate of all San Francisco Bay Area counties rose in May.
Computer services-heavily concentrated in the San Francisco Bay Area-are bearing the brunt of the employment slowdown.  Business service employment-which includes computer programming and personnel supply services-grew by nearly 13,000 jobs per month in 2000 but has averaged only 800 a month thus far in 2001.  Within business services, the growth rate of computer services employment has been cut in half.  Year-over-year industry employment growth in the San Jose Metropolitan Area-the Silicon Valley-has dropped from 5.9 percent in December 2000 to 1.3 percent in May 2001.  Growth in the San Francisco Metropolitan Area over the same period dropped from 4.7 percent to 2.6 percent.
California's real estate market is also cooling.  Home sales have moderated and prices in the state's costliest region, Santa Clara County, have softened.  Statewide sales of single-family homes in May were off nearly 13 percent from one year ago.  However, the median price of a single-family home in May was still up 10.7 percent from a year-ago.
Preliminary General Fund agency cash for June was $432 million below the 2001-02 May Revision forecast of $7.926 billion. Year-to-date, revenues are $389 million lower than the $78.781 billion that was expected.
www.cmta.net
California Manufacturers & Technology Association
980 9th Street, Suite 2200
Sacramento, CA  95814
(916) 441-5420 phone
(916) 447-9401 fax


Norma,

I talked to G. Koepke, an associate reporting to Maureen
She told me that things have  significantly  improved in recent weeks.

Vince


As some of you have heard, I have gotten back into the energy business.  I
finished my work in the private equity world with IGP and recently started
with Reliant Resources, the unregulated merchant business of Reliant
Energy.  The company is scheduled to IPO the first week in February with a
distribution of remaining shares some ten months later.  It's a great
challenge to build a business in the face of the upcoming electricity
deregulation in Texas.  For some of my Enron friends that were around when
ECT started trading power and really started growing, the challenge is very
similar.  I'm looking forward to it and I think it will be a lot of fun.

I'm head of a group called Transaction Development & Support focusing
primarily on the large C&I customers.  This group will be responsible for
structuring (that overused word again) deals, keeping the originators
focused on the proper segments of the market, getting the deals sold out
the back door and then tracking the remaining portfolio.

My new contact info is:

tel - 713.207.3170
cell - 713.898.9481
james_r_easter@reliantenergy.com

Now... for those of you looking for a good stock tip and who isn't, I would
strongly advise shorting Starbucks.  As I will no longer be consuming vast
quantities of overpriced latte while digesting the daily Arts section of
the New York Times, I fear for their ongoing viability.

Stay in touch and best wishes to you and your families for the Holidays.

Jim


Its been a pleasure working with all of you.  Good Luck and keep in touch.

home: 281-240-0784
cell:832-372-5167
emial: nrbcpa@aol.com

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Husain, Karima
Sent:	Friday, November 30, 2001 2:52 PM
To:	McKinney, Hal; Abel, Chris; Wilson, Shona; Luong, Anita; Thibodeaux, Kenneth; Allison, John; Trevino, Susan; Hernandez, Nancy; Schultz, Cassandra; Adams, Aaron; McClure, Zakia; Ramesh, Ganapathy; Considine, Keith; Lim, Francis S.; Prejean, Frank; Bruce, Michelle; McLaughlin Jr., Errol; McDowell, Shirley; Scott, Susan M.; Couch, Greg; Barrington, Paul; Johnson, Luchas; Quigley, Dutch; Schulte, Vanessa; Wang, Huei-Ying; Jones, Brad; Shea, Alex; Brewer, Charles
Subject:	RE: Contact Info

Here's mine:

khh786@yahoo.com
home:  281-238-0210

Good luck,

Karima

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	McKinney, Hal
Sent:	Friday, November 30, 2001 2:48 PM
To:	Abel, Chris; Wilson, Shona; Luong, Anita; Thibodeaux, Kenneth; Allison, John; Trevino, Susan; Hernandez, Nancy; Schultz, Cassandra; Adams, Aaron; McClure, Zakia; Ramesh, Ganapathy; Considine, Keith; Lim, Francis S.; Husain, Karima; Prejean, Frank; Bruce, Michelle; McLaughlin Jr., Errol; McDowell, Shirley; Scott, Susan M.; Couch, Greg; Barrington, Paul; Johnson, Luchas; Quigley, Dutch; Schulte, Vanessa; Wang, Huei-Ying; Jones, Brad; Shea, Alex; Brewer, Charles
Subject:	Contact Info

(Just in case...) I have enjoyed working with all of you talented people.

Good Luck & Thanks,

Hal McKinney
work - (713)345-3707
cell - (281)773-7982

hmckinney3@yahoo.com


I continue to say "no" for financial because they are not an eligible swap
participant.  For a counterparty to become an eligible swap participant if
they are not one in their own right, they would have to post an up front
letter of credit fully covering their trading PRIOR to doing any trades.  So
this ball is in Credit's court.


FYI - This attachment is what we compared against.

-----Original Message-----
From: Levine, Ross [mailto:rlevine@fce.com]
Sent: Friday, November 03, 2000 8:29 AM
To: Leitman, Jerry; Leo, Tony; Bentley, Chris; 'Jacqueline Scheib'
Cc: Mahler, Joseph
Subject: FW: Rev next of purchase agreement

Here's the latest from Enron. I haven't looked at it yet. When do we want a
joint review session?
Ross

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [SMTP:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2000 9:44 PM
> To: rlevine@fce.com; hnock@fce.com
> Cc: Scott.Healy@enron.com; Stephen.Plauche@enron.com;
> Heather.Kroll@enron.com
> Subject: Rev next of purchase agreement
>
> Hi there,
>
> I'm attaching the latest version of the purchase agreement.  I will
> prepare
> a compared version in the am if you will tell me which version you want it
> compared against.
>
> Talk to you soon,
>
> Kay
>
> (See attached file: FuelCellequipmentNov2rev2.doc)
> <<FuelCellequipmentNov2rev2.doc>>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------
This transmittal may be a confidential attorney-client communication or may
otherwise be privileged or confidential. If it is not clear that you are the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this
transmittal in error; any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of
this transmittal is strictly prohibited. If you suspect that you have
received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
telephone at 1-860-275-8200, or e-mail at it@rc.com and immediately delete
this message and all its attachments.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------

 - FuelCellequipmentNov2rev2.doc


Per my conversation with Nicor Gas Company's attorney, Northern Illinois Gas
Company changed its name to Nicor Gas Company. Therefore, Nicor Gas Company
is the only entity that all the deals needs to be booked under. However, the
attorney also agreed to the fact that they do use the name "Northern Illinois
Gas Company d/b/a Nicor Gas Company" eversince the name change happened. He
said they had been using both names "contractually" and interchangeably even
though it is all just ONE company, one state registered company.

I'm currently waiting on name change documents, however this is what it looks
like thats going to happen:
The main HQ company would end up being NICOR GAS COMPANY with all the
trades/contracts/deals being merged into one record. However, if need be we
could have a Tradename set up as "Northern Illinois Gas Company d/b/a Nicor
Gas Company" since this is how the company does business as, in some cases.

Nicor's legal Dept could be reached at (630) 983-8676 for any further
clarifications in this matter.

Adnan Patel
Global Counterparty
x58335

From: Tana Jones@ECT on 08/17/2000 03:47 PM
To: Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Adnan
Patel/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Northern Illinois Gas Company/Nicor Gas Company

There appears to be confusion over who and what products we should be trading
with these entities.

We have an ISDA Master Agreement in place with Northern Illinois Gas Company
d/b/a Nicor Gas Company.  This is a new master.  If the counterparty is not
set up this way it need to be.

Physical gas has a master in place with Northern Illinois Gas Company.

There is no master agreement in place with Nicor Gas Company and the only
trading being done with this entity is online gas trading.

The issue that needs to be resolved is whether we want to trade gas under
both Northern Illinois Gas Company and Nicor Gas Company.  Frank Davis will
resolve this issue with Tom Moran in Credit and Stacy Dickson with physical
gas Legal, and they will let us know who we should be trading with.

When we hear back from them we can finally resolve what counterparty names we
want to set up and get back to the counterparty if we have not received the
correct Password Application to match out intended trading partners.

Sorry for all the confusion this is causing.  I am confused too.


FYI - see below

----- Forwarded by Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron on 06/04/2001 12:45 PM -----

	Flavia Negrete/ENRON@enronXgate
	06/04/2001 12:40 PM

		 To: Anthony Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cheryl Johnson/ENRON@enronXgate, Jerry
Britain/ENRON@enronXgate, Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie
Panus/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Replace for Leslie Campbell while on maternity leave

I will be taking over Leslie Campbell's duties while she is on maternity
leave.  Please forward any correspondence or emails to me.  I look forward to
working with ya'll

Flavia Negrete
Risk Assessment and Control
EB2824
X5-4849


Kathy Campos
ETS Finance
EB4055
713-853-6833


Although it is only Tuesday, I am already trying to plan for the weekend.
John's brother Gib is visiting us and we were hoping to see you (sans Kim)
on Saturday for dinner ... at Lupe's?

How is it going in Kim's absence? If I can assist in any way, please let me
know.

C


The esprit de corps among Enron's overseas  employees contributed to its initial success.  And at  home!


Today we announced the appointment of Jeff McMahon as Enron's chief financial officer.  In my continued discussions with the financial community yesterday and today, it became clear that this move was required to restore investor confidence.  Jeff has unparalleled qualifications and a deep and thorough understanding of Enron.  He is already on the job and hard at work on the issues before us.  Andy Fastow will be on a leave of absence from the company.

Jeff had been serving as chairman and CEO of Enron Industrial Markets. He joined Enron in 1994 and spent three years in the London office as chief financial officer for Enron's European operations.  Upon returning to the U.S., Jeff was executive vice president of finance and treasurer for Enron Corp.  In 2000, he was named president and chief operating officer of Enron Net Works.

I know all of you are concerned about the continuing decline in our share price.  I am too, and we are working very hard to turn it around.  Appointing Jeff as CFO is one important step in that process.  But most of the solution involves just continuing to do our jobs with excellence.  The fundamentals of our business are strong, and I think the market will begin to see that as we continue to perform.

Please join me in giving Jeff your full support, and thank you for all of your continued hard work.


---------------------- Forwarded by Kayne Coulter/HOU/ECT on 04/04/2001 05:29
PM ---------------------------

Michael Jacobson@ENRON
04/04/2001 05:03 PM
To: Kayne Coulter/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FYI - GTC

Kayne,

GTC has changed their transmission price for non-firm hourly to $2.49
(including losses) although it has not been updated on their website.

Thanks,
Michael
x35098


Good day to all,
Cougars@Enron is hosting our first annual golf tournament on March 26, 2001
at Falcon Point Golf Club in Katy.  The purpose for the golf tournament is to
provide scholarships for Enron dependants to attend the University of Houston
and fund operating expenses.  Mr. Lay has graciously agreed to be our
honorary chair for this event which will most certainly guarantee success.  I
would like to ask that Enron participate in this event from a sponsorship
capacity. Many Enron employees, University of Houston faculty, students and
alumni will be participating and I believe that this will be a chance to
promote the Enron name in all of those areas.  Considering that we are
pushing the area of recruiting with this university, this will be an
excellent way to enhance said efforts.  We will be marketing the sponsors
through advertising, tournament recognition and special mention at the post
tournament reception and dinner.  The levels are as follows:

Amount Level   What is received
$5,000.00  Title sponsor  Advertising and recognition throughout the entire
event.  2 teams of four to play the tournament.  Golf shirts, lunch and
dinner  for sponsor participants.  Invitation to present scholarships at the
scholarship dinner subsequent to the event.

$2,500.00 Gold sponsor  Advertising and recognition throughout the entire
event.  1 team of four to play the tournament.  Golf shirts, lunch and
dinner      for sponsor participants.

$2,500.00 Silver sponsor  Advertising and recognition throughout the entire
event.  2 people to play the tournament.  Golf shirts, lunch and dinner
for sponsor participants.

$100  Hole sponsor  Advertising at 1 hole of the tournament.

I believe that Enron would benefit from participating in this event.  The
scholarships benefits Enron employees, there are 650 Enron employees that are
graduates of the University of Houston who will take great pride in knowing
that Enron supports their university, the recruiting program will benefit
because deans, faculty, professional groups, students and alumni will be
involved which should enhance relations that would beneficial to our efforts
there.

Please let me know what we can do.  I continue to believe that Cougars@Enron
is a group that can benefit the company, the employees and the university and
this tournament will be the key to its success.

Thanks for your time!!
Jeff McClellan
President-Cougars@Enron


AGA for 6/2/00 is 78


Outlook Migration Team@ENRON
04/30/2001 09:02 PM
To: Anna Mehrer/PDX/ECT@ECT, Chris Lackey/PDX/ECT@ECT, Chris
Mallory/PDX/ECT@ECT, Dave Fuller/PDX/ECT@ECT, Diana Scholtes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ed
Clark/PDX/ECT@ECT, Fran Chang/PDX/ECT@ECT, Glenn Surowiec/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Heather Dunton/PDX/ECT@ECT, Holden Salisbury/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jeff
Richter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Shields/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jeff G Slaughter/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Jeffrey Oh/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jessica Burry/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jim Buerkle/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Jim Gilbert/PDX/ECT@ECT, Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Laura Wente/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mark Fisher/EWC/Enron@Enron, Samantha Law/PDX/ECT@ECT, Sean
Crandall/PDX/ECT@ECT, Terry W Donovan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Todd Perry/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Tom Alonso/PDX/ECT@ECT, Tracy Ngo/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: 2- SURVEY/INFORMATION EMAIL 5-02-01

Current Notes User:

To ensure that you experience a successful migration from Notes to Outlook,
it is necessary to gather individual user information prior to your date of
migration.  Please take a few minutes to completely fill out the following
survey.  When you finish, simply click on the 'Reply' button then hit 'Send'
Your survey will automatically be sent to the Outlook 2000 Migration Mailbox.

Thank you.

Outlook 2000 Migration Team

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------

Full Name:        Mary Katherine (Kate) Symes

Login ID:  marykate

Extension:  7486

Office Location:  121 SW Salmon St., 3WTC0306, Portland, OR

What type of computer do you have?  (Desktop,  Laptop,  Both)  Desktop

Do you have a PDA?  If yes, what type do you have:   (None, IPAQ, Palm Pilot,
Jornada)  None

Do you have permission to access anyone's Email/Calendar?  NO
    If yes, who?

Does anyone have permission to access your Email/Calendar?  NO
    If yes, who?

Are you responsible for updating anyone else's address book?  NO
    If yes, who?

Is anyone else responsible for updating your address book?  NO
    If yes, who?

Do you have access to a shared calendar?  NO
    If yes, which shared calendar?

Do you have any Distribution Groups that Messaging maintains for you (for
mass mailings)?  YES
    If yes, please list here:  EES, Confirms, Traders, EES Power Settlements,
Portland Shift

Please list all Notes databases applications that you currently use:  ??? (I
rely on Lotus Notes for almost all of my correspondence and documentation
with other Enron groups, but I'm unclear on what "databases applications"
means. I use Notes to send, receive, and store e-mails - that's it.)

In our efforts to plan the exact date/time of your migration, we also will
need to know:

What are your normal work hours?  From:  8 a.m.    To:   6 p.m.

Will you be out of the office in the near future for vacation, leave, etc? NO
       If so, when?        From (MM/DD/YY):      To (MM/DD/YY):


Jeff,

Please review the attached change order regarding storage for Unit 1.  I will
call to discuss.

Chris


Dah? Is he kidding us? Dirk

-----Original Message-----
From: "Fantz, Donald" <DIF1@pge.com>@ENRON@EES
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 1999 8:39 PM
To: Cone, Rob
Cc: "'Dick Smith'" <dick_smith@csufresno.edu>@ENRON@EES; vanUlden, Dirk;
"Hagen, John H" <JHH4@pge.com>@ENRON@EES; "Kinert, Robert"
<RCK3@pge.com>@ENRON@EES
Subject: RE: PG&E drawing request

 Rob,
After discussion with one of our folks, who has experience with the CEQA
process, we feel that the narrative should provide what you need for our
part in the CEQA process.  If you need additional information regarding
this, please contact Mr. Gaylen Raymond at (559) 263-5239.
By the way, do we have a tentative date to meet again for around
mid-December? I will not be available on Fridays in Dec.
Don Fantz
> ----------
> From:  Cone, Rob[SMTP:Rob_Cone@enron.com]
> Sent:  Tuesday, November 30, 1999 10:32 AM
> To:  Fantz, Donald
> Cc:  'Dick Smith'; vanUlden, Dirk
> Subject:  PG&E drawing request
>
> Don
>
> Thank you again for the narrative of the proposed PG&E work on
> overbuilding the existing overhead line for the new 115kV circuit.  Can I
> still expect the drawing indicating the routing of the existing line
> sometime this week?  I need to have this info. to discuss your proposed
> work with our CEQA consultant.
>
> Thanks
>
> Rob Cone
>
> Project Manager
> Enron Energy Services
> 12647 Alcosta Blvd., Suite 500
> San Ramon, CA 94583
> Ph:925.543.3701, Fax:925.543.3550
> Pager:888.397.5826
>
>


are you back to not talking to me again?


At the request of Nelson Ferries, attached is a draft of ENA's GISB with
special provisions.  Please give me a call with your questions and or
comments at (713) 853-7658.

Regards,

Debra Perlingiere
Legal Specialist


Please get on this distribution if needed.  Thanks.  Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 02/21/2001 03:30 PM -----

	Amanda Huble@ENRON
	02/20/2001 04:35 PM

		 To: Fletcher J Sturm/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Tomaski/Corp/Enron@Enron, Laura
Luce/Corp/Enron@Enron, Julie A Gomez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank W
Vickers/NA/Enron@Enron, Jonathan McKay/CAL/ECT@ECT, Tim
Heizenrader/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer
Fraser/HOU/ECT, Kimberly Hillis/HOU/ECT, Caroline Abramo/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Supply Weekly Update

Thank you,
Amanda Huble
713-853-4384


please call - 201-968-0001
re calim of Enron Perry Gas Case

_____________________
Sara del Pozo
Contract Employee for
Stephanie M. Truss
Senior Administrative Assistant
Enron Wholesale Services
1400 Smith Street
Houston, Texas 77002
(713) 345-3861 - Telephone
(713) 646-3490 - Facsimile


fyi.  also, I just spoke with Sarah Wesner (ext. 35261) who will coordinate
with you.  You can review the note with her and let's talk about their
guaranty (will our guaranty format work?).  Also, I'm almost inclined to go
with their commitment letter (if revised) in lieu of a lengthier agreement.
SS
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 06/22/2000 08:46 AM -----

	Sarah Wesner@ENRON
	06/20/2000 07:24 PM

		 To: Joseph Deffner/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Differences

Joe - attached is a first shot at getting a handle on all the differences
between the proposed and existing margin lines.  I plan to do more analysis
with respect to covenants and warranties but this hits the main points.  The
analysis between rates will be very complex and may be something best left to
the research Group.  We can go through why this is such a complex issue to
model.  What I do plan to do is update historical info. so that based on the
past we can make general statements such as over time Fed Funds + X bp <,>,=
to LIBOR + X bp.

A quick synapses of difficult items:

Commissions vs. Margin lines - will trading desk use facility for many trades
or less frequent trades for smaller amounts
Short on Financial gas vs. Long on physical gas - cash flow differentials and
how we can model the cost of cash to fund the working capital (as you
explained to me today)
What positions the trader take and how our equity position is at that exact
time.  Will we trade in a similar fashion in the future?

From what I understand the trading desks do not have ready access to the
above  information in a format which lends itself to modelling of reasonable
complexity or do not wish to share it with us (understandable considering the
sensitive nature of the business.)  The ideal situation would be for the
desks to decide themselves whether a line makes sense for them based on the
pricing provided.  As mentioned above, I believe that we should be able to
explain why a certain base rate would be attractive but am not sure how to
estimate the value of a line to the traders without detailed information.
Perhaps the best division of labour would be for the desks to decide what
loan would be most valuable based on the desk's trading patterns while we
could focus on getting the line in place as quickly as possible.  If you
disagree, please let me know and I will try to rethink how to model this
appropriately.

Sarah


18ft kenner fishing boat with a 120johnson (thats a motor not something
naughty)

Dave Scott@EES
12/19/2000 10:16 AM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Vacation

I got it.  But the crayon sort of smeared and it was hard to read ... what
was the item listed after a scooter ?

Chris Germany@ECT
12/19/2000 10:14 AM
To: Dave Scott/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Re: Vacation

I will.  I hope you got my Christmas list.

Dave Scott@EES
12/19/2000 10:09 AM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Vacation

Have a wonderful time

Chris Germany@ECT
12/19/2000 08:43 AM
To: Jeffrey Porter/HOU/EES@EES, Dave Scott/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Tricia Spence/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dick Jenkins/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Vacation

I will be out this afternoon.  If you need to do any deals call Dick Jenkins.

Thanks


Thanks for the report.  The PX does have a 30 minute live camera of the PX
trading floor!

Mike


I received a letter from Westinghouse in response to our threat to draw on
the letter of credit.  A copy is being delivered to you today.  I have spoken
to Patty Clark (Asst. General Counsel for Allegheny) about what we are doing
and she didn,t seem overly concerned but asked to be kept in the loop.  I
told her that Enron was very sensitive about the potential impact that our
threats against Westinghouse might have on Allegheny,s contractual
relationship with them.  Personally, I don,t think that we should draw on the
letter of credit (even though I believe that we are entirely in the right on
this one) because it might somehow hurt Allegheny.  I don,t, however, want to
take the heat off of Westinghouse so I have not said anything.

We had a call with Westinghouse yesterday to discuss the facts surrounding
our claim and have a follow up call scheduled for Wednesday (6/13) at 3:00
pm.  You are welcome to participate if you would like.  To date, lawyers from
either side have not participated in discussions as they have been primarily
fact-finding in nature.  I am happy to give you an update as to what has
happened and what I expect to occur on Wednesday at your convenience.

Take care,

Stuart


Stewart:  I'll have to review their master to be certain (and insure that
there is no specific prohibition against weather transactions).  In general,
there is nothing else required specifically, although we may have to add some
language to the weather confirmations themselves.  Sara

	Stewart Rosman
	06/06/2000 05:26 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Merced Question

Sara -
Does Merced need to do anything to enter into financial weather transactions
(remember that they have a ISDA and have done numerous power swaps for the
past year)?

Thanks

Stewart


So you should be able to cut and paste this.

Jeffrey Oh


Start Date: 2/2/02; HourAhead hour: 16;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.


Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490

----- Forwarded by Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT on 05/14/2001 04:59 PM -----

	Theresa Staab@ENRON
	05/14/2001 04:07 PM

		 To: Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Citation

You were thanking me too soon for the info on the confirm.
I gave you the wrong information. (Alan Koelemay just called me.  I told him
that it was my fault and we'll be sending him a new one.)

The price should be:
Inside FERC CIG Index minus $.67 not Gas Daily minus $.55 (that was the
purchase prices from April.  Which is the month I'm working on for
allocations right now.  (Not that this falls as a valid excuse)).  All other
information is fine.

Alan is throwing away the confirm you sent and is waiting for a new one.

My fax # is (303) 534-0552.

I'm sorry for the mix up.  (I'll never take a 2 week vacation again.  I can't
get myself back into the swing)

Theresa
(303) 575-6485

	Debra Perlingiere@ECT
	05/14/2001 03:01 PM

		 To: Theresa Staab/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Citation

Yes I have a signed original and will fax you same.  Thanks for the feedback
on the confirm.  Fax # ?

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


It is with regret that I have to announce that Jeff Skilling is leaving Enron.  Today, the Board of Directors accepted his resignation as President and CEO of Enron.  Jeff is resigning for personal reasons and his decision is voluntary.  I regret his decision, but I accept and understand it.  I have worked closely with Jeff for more than 15 years, including 11 here at Enron, and have had few, if any, professional relationships that I value more.  I am pleased to say that he has agreed to enter into a consulting arrangement with the company to advise me and the Board of Directors.
Now it's time to look forward.
With Jeff leaving, the Board has asked me to resume the responsibilities of President and CEO in addition to my role as Chairman of the Board.  I have agreed.  I want to assure you that I have never felt better about the prospects for the company.  All of you know that our stock price has suffered substantially over the last few months.  One of my top priorities will be to restore a significant amount of the stock value we have lost as soon as possible.  Our performance has never been stronger; our business model has never been more robust; our growth has never been more certain; and most importantly, we have never had a better nor deeper pool of talent throughout the company.  We have the finest organization in American business today.  Together, we will make Enron the world's leading company.
On Thursday at 10:00 a.m. Houston time, we will hold an all employee meeting at the Hyatt.  We will broadcast the meeting to our employees around the world where technically available, and I look forward to seeing many of you there.


Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 03/13/2001 04:45 PM -----

	Jorge A Garcia@ENRON
	03/13/2001 08:10 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Equity Swap ISDA Confirmation

Good Morning Sara,

Per your request, here is the preliminary confirmation for the Total Return
Equity Swap with Enron Europe.

Regards,

Jorge


I just sold 3,000 dth to CES for July 31st, deal 348523.  Per Jeff Porter,
this is an in-ground storage transfer.  Jeff is faxing me the form to
transfer the gas from ENA's storage to BG&E's storage account.  The transfer
needs to be completed by July 31st.


----- Forwarded by Brian Hendon/Enron Communications on 01/30/01 03:04 PM
-----

	Farhad Ahad
	01/26/01 01:21 PM

		 To: Mo Bawa/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Jeremy Buss/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Monty McMahen/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications
		 cc: (bcc: Brian Hendon/Enron Communications)
		 Subject: Maybe in Windows 2001 Upgrade ?

 - Thingsyo.doc

Farhad Ahad
Transaction Development and Structuring
Enron Broadband Services
cell:    832-428-3693
work:  713-345-8744
email:  farhad_ahad@enron.net


Tracy,
I'm totally confused as to who we're supposed to send numbers to.  I know you got something for 3rd CE from Kenny.  Can you forward that to me so that I can make Mei-Ling happy?  Kenny is out of the office today.

Thanks,
Paula

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kaster, Mei-Ling
Sent:	Monday, October 08, 2001 9:45 AM
To:	Parrish, Paula J.
Subject:	3CE and Sept Flash

Paula,

I did not send you this before because I was told that Azurix will not be part of EGAS.  I was just told that we need to get Sept flash and 3CE of Azurix from you.  Please input Azurix Sept preliminary flash numbers directly in 3CE file ASAP and let me know when done.  Please call with any question.

Mei-Ling

From:	Kaster, Mei-Ling
Sent:	Wednesday, September 19, 2001 7:47 PM
To:	Alvares, Joana; Ausucua, Adrian; Berger, Peter; Boe, Larry A. (Lawrence); Brazzel, Tom; Cannell, Kathleen; Cunningham, Michael; Dominguez, Patrick; Dumayas, Danthea - EI; Eubanks, Archie N.; Howes, Carol; Martinez, Mary; McCann, Steven K.; McLaughlin, Sabrina; Monroe, James Joseph; Morales-Vazquez, Norma; Nelson, Joao; Nguyen, Thao; Nguyen, Yen; Ortiz, Mauricio; Parrish, Paula J.; Phillips, Monique; Rangel, Rafael; Ross, Todd; Salvatierra, Carlos; Schnorbus, Nicole; Tran, Joanne; Yao, Anne S.
Cc:	Tran, Agatha
Subject:	3rd CE and September Flash

Hi, everyone,

Here we go again.  You all know the drill very well.

The 3rd CE  is due on October 10 and the files are saved in g:\common\jvm\reporting\EGA Regions\2001\Current Estimate\3rd CE folder.

The requirements include

   1.   Major Assumptions
   2.   Income Statement in both Corp format and EGAS format( same as "Hannon format" - 100% project income, Enron's IBIT and Enron's NI).   A folder named "EGAS Format" was created within "3rd CE" folder for you to save "EGAS Format income statement".
   3.   Indirect Cash Flow
   4.   Variance Explanation for both 3CE vs Plan and 3CE vs 2CE( We only need the explanation of IBIT variance for 3CE vs 2CE)

Please provide the variance explanation for 3CE vs Plan in the "Variance Explanation" column (set up to the right of the monthly income statement) for your project.  Please provide the IBIT variance explanation for 3CE vs 2CE in the sheet named "Var Expl 3CE vs 2CE" for your project.

Just a few friendly reminders,

1.	Please tie out August actuals to Hyperion by September 26 and drop in September flash in the 3rd CE file. The tentative due date for September flash is Friday, October 5th. Please do not change September final flash numbers while you work on the 3rd CE.

2.	Please do not change the plan numbers.

3.	These files are linked to the consolidation file.  Please do not insert/delete columns/rows or change the page setup or print range.

4.	Please do not copy value to or put your links into those cells with formula such as "subtotal" or "total".

We all have very tight deadlines among plan, forecast, earnings release, current estimate and others.  Your cooperation is very imperative to the success of these processes.   Please adhere to the due dates if all possible.  Please feel free to call with any question or suggestion.  Thanks for your effort and assistance.

Mei-Ling


i don't remember half of that night, but i do remember you in the bathroom.
sierra is fun on wednesdays isn't it?


Ugh.  We'll keep working this angle if their new attorney shows up on deck,
but I think Susan and I have done as much as can be done with Howard H.  Do
any of you know what the Red Cedar facilities look like?  I.e. how many miles
of line, any big diameter line, any compression, etc?  Howard must have read
some old cases and gotten himself spooked that their facilites aren't
gathering under the modified primary function test.  I'm not sure why he
thinks signing a transport contract with us will make their situation any
worse, but that seems to be his conclusion.  If Steve and Bill can't nudge
Red Cedar's management into doing the deal, I'd suggest that you both or one
of you ask Tsuri (sp?) to have his new lawyer call me and Susan after Howard
leaves, maybe with one of the Kinder Morgan lawyers on the phone also, and
we'll try to straighten this out.
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 01/12/2000
08:37 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Susan Scott                           01/11/2000 05:29 PM

To: Drew Fossum@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Red Cedar

I regret to report that I just ended a very unproductive phone conversation
with Mr. Hertzberg.  He thanked us for all our cooperation but politely
declined to give me any information on what authority he was relying on to
conclude that there is a jurisdictional problem.  However, it sounded to me
like whatever authority he does have is shaky at best.  He also sounded
interested in the possibility of our making some sort of anonymous inquiry at
FERC (if such a thing is possible) on the issue.  Obviously they are very
leery of making that phone call themselves and risking revealing their
identity.  He said he would discuss it with Ed Meaders.  Also, he mentioned
that after tomorrow he will be on vacation for a month, and another attorney
will be taking over in his absence.  That could be good, or it could be bad.
Maybe Lorraine can sweet talk Meaders into at least citing us some cases from
Hertzberg's memo.  At the very least, I hope he will show it to the Kinder
Morgan lawyers.


To further clarify Greg's e-mail, all wires being paid out of the general
disbursement account (0530) should be coded from the company that is
incurring the cost.  For example, if company 1N2 is sending out cash for an
investment, the wire should reflect company 1N2 as the sender and not company
413 as coded previously.  If you have any questions, please do not hesitate
to ask.  Thanks.

HV

---------------------- Forwarded by Hope Vargas/HOU/ECT on 08/02/2000 12:49
PM ---------------------------

Greg Whiting@ENRON
08/01/2000 11:49 PM
To: Mary Lynne Ruffer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Georgeanne Hodges/HOU/ECT@ECT, James
Coffey/ENRON@Gateway, Karry Kendall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jody Pierce/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Angeles Beltri/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hope Vargas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael S
Galvan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen Thatcher/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mark
Frank/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah Brown/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim Pond/Corp/Enron@Enron, Faith
Killen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Troy Klussmann/HOU/ECT@ECT, Todd Warwick/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Cynthia Morrow/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Cash Service Company Codes - ENA Co. 0530

FYI - When coding wires the sender should NOT be listed as Co. 0530.  The
cash services companies should be tranparent to the users.  This is all
behind the scenes in SAP and treasury.  Wires and other payment requests
should be coded from the company that is incurring the cost (just like
pre-SAP).  Vendors should NOT be requested to be setup on Co. 0530.  I have
requested AP to return to sender any payment requests that have Co. 0530 as
the paying company.

Please pass this on to your groups.  Thanks.

     Greg x35399


Books that need to be set up.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Grigsby, Mike
Sent:	Wednesday, January 02, 2002 9:02 AM
To:	Gossett, Jeffrey C.
Subject:	RE: Netco P&L's

West Gas Trading

Mike Grigsby
Frank Ermis
Keith Holst
Jay Reitmeyer
Jane Tholt
Tori Kuykendall
Jason Wolfe
Matt Smith
Matt Lenhart
Phillip Allen

Do you need VAR estimates form me?

Grigsby

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Gossett, Jeffrey C.
Sent:	Wednesday, January 02, 2002 8:56 AM
To:	Martin, Thomas A.; Shively, Hunter S.; Neal, Scott; Grigsby, Mike; Arnold, John
Cc:	Lavorato, John; Kitchen, Louise
Subject:	Netco P&L's

Can I get a list of the traders that will make up the new reporting list for the new company as we stand today?  We need to get new books set up, and also we need to get the V@R engine ready to go as well.

Thanks


TASK ASSIGNMENT

Status:		completed

Task Priority:		1
Task Due On:		3/27/2000
Task Start Date:	3/27/2000


Jeff,

Please review the attached change order regarding storage for Unit 1.  I will
call to discuss.

Chris


Please read
I'm sure you will be getting some calls.

DS
---------------------- Forwarded by Darrell Schoolcraft/ET&S/Enron on 05/30/2001 06:33 AM ---------------------------

Rich Jolly
05/29/2001 05:09 PM
To:	Darrell Schoolcraft/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Rick Smith/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc:	Team Mountainair@ENRON, Team Laguna/ET&S/Enron@Enron

Subject:	FW: El Paso blow down

Darrell if you will pass this information to our controllers it will be appreciated. We will probably get some call's from the local people.
Thanks
RJ
---------------------- Forwarded by Rich Jolly/ET&S/Enron on 05/29/2001 03:52 PM ---------------------------
From:	Dan Maschka/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/29/2001 04:26 PM CDT
To:	Randy Rice/ENRON@enronXgate, Rich Jolly/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject:	FW: El Paso blow down

FYI

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Don
Sent:	Tuesday, May 29, 2001 4:12 PM
To:	Maschka, Dan; Toews, John; Wilson, Steve; Cooney, Denny; Ruiz, Norm; Operations Communication Center - Omaha
Subject:	FW: El Paso blow down

FYI everyone

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	David Ferrer/Albuquerque/ET&S/Enron@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-David+20Ferrer_Albuquerque_ET+26S_Enron+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Tuesday, May 29, 2001 2:50 PM
To:	Nelson, Don
Subject:	El Paso blow down

On June the 4th at 0600 El Paso Nat Gas is going to blow down a section of their pipeline that is in
the Belen NM area. I'm sure we will be getting some calls, so we thought we would let you know.
If you could also forward this to gas control  it would sure help. Thanks, Mountainair team.


Piotr,
Tak, koniec czerwca.
Dam Ci znac.

Wicek
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Karasinski, Piotr [FI]" <piotr.karasinski@ssmb.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Karasinski+2C+20Piotr+20+5BFI+5D+22+20+3Cpiotr+2Ekarasinski+40ssmb+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Thursday, May 31, 2001 7:20 AM
To:	Kaminski, Vince J
Subject:	Czy planujesz pojawic sie w Londynie  ...

Pozdrowienia, Piotr


I am fine with your proposal.   Mark


As you requested, following are the facts for the media regarding the
negotiated rate deals that TW has recently done at rates in excess of the
tariff max rate.   Please note that the first two transactions are already
public and the following information can be disclosed now.  The third deal
has not been filed yet and will not be public until it is.  That filing will
be made before Dec. 1, 2000.

General:  TW has done three deals in the last week at rates in excess of TW's
maximum tariff rate.  Each of the deals was done pursuant to TW's negotiated
rate authority, which FERC granted TW in 1997.  (Order issued April 11, 1997,
Transwestern Pipeline Co., 79 FERC Par. 61,021).  Pursuant to that authority,
TW has filed negotiated rate tariff sheets with the FERC, which are docketed
at Docket No. RP97-288.  Details on the specific transactions are as follows:

Deal 1:  Counterparty:  PG&E Energy Trading
 Rate Schedule:  ITS-1
 Volume:    30,000/day
 Rate:  $.90/MMBtu, inclusive of surcharges
 Term: the one day period of November 15, 2000
 Receipt points:  NNG Halley, West Texas Pool
 Delivery point:  SoCal Topock

Deal 2:  Same as Deal 1,  except term is one day period of November 16, 2000
and rate is $.75/MMBtu

Deal 3:  Counterparty:  Sempra Energy Trading
 Rate Schedule:  LFT
 Volume:  10,000/day
 Rate:  $1.00/MMBtu, inclusive of surcharges
 Term:  Dec. 1-Dec. 31, 2000
 Receipt point:  Bloomfield
 Delivery point:  PG&E Topock

All of the above information is contained in TW's FERC filings on these
transactions.  No other information is available as TW does not comment on
specific customer transactions.


Steve,

Thanks for your help.

Bill
>>> "Harris, Steven" <Steven.Harris@ENRON.com>  10/23/01 01:30PM >>>
Bill, marked are the projects which are located  near the TW system. If
you need more info let me know.  Thanks.
`    Steve
>  -----Original  Message-----
> From:     Hyatt, Kevin
>  Sent:    Tuesday, October 23, 2001 10:42 AM
>  To:    Harris, Steven
> Cc:    Lindberg,  Lorraine; Watson, Kimberly
> Subject:    Proposed EG  Projects.xls
>
>
> Per Bill Wood's request, the attached  sheet has those power plants
> (marked with "XX" in the left column) that  are currently connected or
> proposed to be connected to the existing  Transwestern Pipeline system.
> Let me know if you have questions.   If the information is
> satisfactory, please forward this message to Bill  Wood.
>
> kh
>
>
>
>   <<Proposed EG Projects.xls>>
>
>
**********************************************************************
This  e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may  contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended  recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly  prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for  the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at  enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message.  This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an  acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract  between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any  other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by  estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


I am going to need his address since the front of the ISDA is a pre-printed
form and I can't email it.

	Edward Sacks/ENRON@enronXgate
	06/01/2001 04:20 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Montana Power Co

Harry Freebourn
hfreebourn@tamerica.com
406-497-5389


Thank you, I got your fax and have forwarded it down to my Online Team for
signature.  As soon as I get it back signed, I will fax a copy back to you.

	Bill Lane <wtl@TradeWellSystems.Com>
	12/28/2000 04:26 PM
	Please respond to "wtl@tradewellsystems.com"

		 To: "'Tana.Jones@enron.com'" <Tana.Jones@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: NDA - TradeWell Systems, Inc.

Tana,

We have no issues with the NDA and have faxed the signed copy over to you as
requested.

Bill

-----Original Message-----
From: Tana.Jones@enron.com [SMTP:Tana.Jones@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2000 5:28 PM
To: wtl@tradewellsystems.com
Cc: Bob.Shults@enron.com; Mark.Greenberg@enron.com
Subject: NDA - TradeWell Systems, Inc.

At the request of Bob Shults, I am enclosing our proposed form of
Non-Disclosure Agreement.  If you have any comments or questions you would
like to discuss with me, do not hesitate to call me at (713) 853-3399.  If
the NDA meets with your approval, please return a copy to me via fax no.
(713) 646-3490.  We look forward to hearing from you.

(See attached file: tradewell.doc) << File: tradewell.doc >>


Welcome to this week's email from Ashford.com. Be sure to visit the
Ashford Outlet for hot savings!

Sizzling Savings
Just in time for summer. We've further reduced the already low prices
throughout the Ashford Outlet. You'll find watches up to 50% off the
Ashford price. And, we've got great savings in every department of
the Outlet. Leading brands. Great selection. Low prices. All with
Ashford's outstanding customer service. Click here and start saving
today. But hurry, quantities in the Outlet are limited!

Watches
Watches from best-selling brands like Breitling, Citizen, Omega and
Movado. Hundreds to choose from.

Sunglasses
Eye-catching savings from top sellers like Gargoyles, Ray-Ban and
Vuarnet. Up to 50% off the Ashford price.

Jewelry
Stylish savings in gold, silver, diamonds and pearls. Priced to sell.
Savings up to 60%.

Handbags & Leather
A wide selection of styles from leading designers. Save as much as
75% off the Ashford price.

Women's Scarves
A luxurious selection of scarves and wraps. Save up to 45% on fine
cashmere and silk items.

Men's Ties
A wide variety of men's ties. Beautiful handmade ties up to 50% off.

Writing Instruments
Cross, Lamy, Montblanc, Sheaffer and Waterman. These are just some of
the quality brands for sale up to 50% off the Ashford price.

Still looking for Father's Day ideas? Or, do you have a need for a
gift for a spring wedding? For all of your shopping and gift-giving
needs, try our Gift Center or visit any of our other departments:

Watches

Vintage watches

Diamonds & Bridal

Jewelry

Home & Lifestyle

Guild Art

Men's Shop

Women's Shop

Fragrances

Sunglasses

Handbags

Writing & Desktop

Corporate Gifts

Ashford Outlet

New Products

Gift Certificates

Dads & Grads
Celebrate Father's Day and Graduation with a thoughtful gift. Check
out our hand-selected gift ideas. You're sure to find just the right
gift for that special person.

*********************************************************************
Joann.com
A SPECIAL OFFER FOR ASHFORD SUBSCRIBERS: Take 40% OFF the regular
price of one item at joann.com, through 6/30/01. Use promotion code
ASHFORD540 at checkout. Offer not valid on regular priced items of
$150 or more. Limit one time use, offer cannot be combined with other
promotion codes and is not valid on Partner Stores or Street Fair.
*********************************************************************

P.S. Please feel free to forward this email to all of your friends
who might be interested in Ashford.com. They'll thank you for it!

--------------------------------------------------------------------
Ashford.com
3800 Buffalo Speedway Suite 400
Houston, Texas 77098
OUR TOLL FREE NUMBER
1 (888) 929-9290
Fax: 713.623.0444
jschunter@ashford.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------

If you have any problems with your email please contact
jschunter@ashford.com.

You're receiving this email because you subscribed at Ashford.com and
requested news and promotions from us. If you wish to change your
address or be removed from Ashford.com's Newsletter just click below:
http://ashford1.m0.net/m/u/asf/a.asp?e=rshapiro%40enron.com


Group,

Per my earlier email, there has been one change.  Harbor's second unit (HRBGN_7_PL2X3), 17mw, will be down for maintenance on July 4th.  I have submitted an outage report to the ISO.

So, no action is required for this unit on 7/4.  The gas turbine, HRBGN_7_UNITS, 80mw, is still available.

Thanks,
Stan


I hope that your holidays were wonderful.  I thoroughly enjoyed the week of
vacation that I took before Christmas.  It was fun to be home with the
children, although I certainly worked hard -- up every night until very late
either baking or wrapping gifts or writing notes on last minute Christmas
cards.

I plan to be in the London office next week.  I will leave Houston on Sunday
evening and will arrive in London Monday morning.  After a stop by the hotel,
I should be in the office after lunch.  I plan to be there through Thursday,
and will fly back to Houston on Friday morning.

I have a number of things planned to review with Mike Jordan.  Some of the
major goals for the trip are:

 to review Mike Jordan's action plan to move the close and officialization of
London books to same  day,

 to replicate an Operational Risk information session for London counterparts
(we are doing this in Houston  on January 11 for managers and above within
Operations for EA, EGM and EIM),

 to discuss the Doorstep process with Mike's business controllers in the
London office who will participate in  Doorstep reviews this year,

 to discuss with Mark Pickering the technology dependencies of the London
office related to speeding up  London's information for the corporate DPR

I also plan to visit with Mike on the feasibility of utilizing our
operational pricing model in London and his thoughts on CommodityLogic and
other ideas around potential commercialization of mid and back office
services.  Mike also has some members of the London team that he would like
for me to meet.

Other things planned are spending some time with Beth Apollo and Ted Murphy.
Ted and I will have a conference call with Shona and Cassandra (and team) for
a download on the New York metals Doorstep review that is taking place this
week.

I would welcome your participation in any or all of the above.  In addition,
I hope that you may have some time for the two of us to touch base.  Also, if
you have an opening for lunch or dinner, do let me know.  I have been in the
throws of bonus allocations this week, but hope that today I can start to
finalize my calendar for next week.  --Sally