Please add Leboe to your distribution.

Thanks.

From: Jeff Dasovich on 03/28/2001 11:06 AM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Angela Schwarz/HOU/EES@EES, Beverly
Aden/HOU/EES@EES, Bill Votaw/HOU/EES@EES, Brenda Barreda/HOU/EES@EES, Carol
Moffett/HOU/EES@EES, Cathy Corbin/HOU/EES@EES, Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Christina Liscano/HOU/EES@EES, Craig H Sutter/HOU/EES@EES, Dan
Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Debora Whitehead/HOU/EES@EES, Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES,
Don Black/HOU/EES@EES, Dorothy Youngblood/HOU/ECT@ECT, Douglas
Huth/HOU/EES@EES, Edward Sacks/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Eric Melvin/HOU/EES@EES,
Erika Dupre/HOU/EES@EES, Evan Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Fran Deltoro/HOU/EES@EES,
Gayle W Muench/HOU/EES@EES, Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@ENRON, Gordon
Savage/HOU/EES@EES, Harold G Buchanan/HOU/EES@EES, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron@ENRON, Iris Waser/HOU/EES@EES, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@ENRON, James W Lewis/HOU/EES@EES, James Wright/Western
Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange, Jeff Messina/HOU/EES@EES, Jeremy
Blachman/HOU/EES@EES, Jess Hewitt/HOU/EES@EES, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kathy Bass/HOU/EES@EES, Kathy
Dodgen/HOU/EES@EES, Ken Gustafson/HOU/EES@EES, Kevin Hughes/HOU/EES@EES,
Leasa Lopez/HOU/EES@EES, Leticia Botello/HOU/EES@EES, Mark S
Muller/HOU/EES@EES, Marsha Suggs/HOU/EES@EES, Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES,
Meredith M Eggleston/HOU/EES@EES, Michael Etringer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael
Mann/HOU/EES@EES, Michelle D Cisneros/HOU/ECT@ECT, mpalmer@enron.com, Neil
Bresnan/HOU/EES@EES, Neil Hong/HOU/EES@EES, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Paula
Warren/HOU/EES@EES, Richard L Zdunkewicz/HOU/EES@EES, Richard
Leibert/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@ENRON, Rita
Hennessy/NA/Enron@ENRON, Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES, Rosalinda
Tijerina/HOU/EES@EES, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott Gahn/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES,
Sharon Dick/HOU/EES@EES, skean@enron.com, Tanya Leslie/HOU/EES@EES, Tasha
Lair/HOU/EES@EES, Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Terri Greenlee/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tim
Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tony Spruiell/HOU/EES@EES, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES,
Vladimir Gorny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wanda Curry/HOU/EES@EES, William S
Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kathryn Corbally/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jubran
Whalan/HOU/EES@EES, triley@enron.com, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert C
Williams/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Greg Wolfe/HOU/ECT@ECT, James
Wright/Western Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange, Dirk vanUlden/Western
Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange, Steve Walker/SFO/EES@EES, Jennifer
Rudolph/HOU/EES@EES, Martin Wenzel/SFO/HOU/EES@EES, Douglas
Condon/SFO/EES@EES, wgang@enron.com, Scott Govenar <sgovenar@govadv.com>,
Hedy Govenar <hgovenar@govadv.com> @ ENRON, jklauber@llgm.com, Mike D
Smith/HOU/EES@EES, John Neslage/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Janel
Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Eric Letke/DUB/EES@EES, Richard B
Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, gfergus@brobeck.com, Michael Tribolet/ENRON@enronXgate,
Robert Frank/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Initiative Campaign Strategy Outline

FYI
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 03/28/2001 11:04 AM -----

	Jean Munoz <jmunoz@mcnallytemple.com>
	03/27/2001 08:53 PM

		 To: Katie Kaplan <kaplan@iepa.com>, "'Andy Brown (E-mail)'"
<ABB@eslawfirm.com>, "'B Brown Andy (E-mail)'" <andybrwn@earthlink.net>,
"'Baker Carolyn (E-mail)'" <cabaker@duke-energy.com>, "'Bob Escalante
(E-mail)'" <rescalante@riobravo-gm.com>, "'Bob Weisenmiller (E-mail)'"
<rbw@mrwassoc.com>, "'Curtis Kebler (E-mail)'"
<curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com>, "Dean. Nistetter (E-mail)"
<Dean.Nistetter@dynegy.com>, "'Douglas Kerner (E-mail)'" <DKK@eslawfirm.com>,
"'Greg Blue (E-mail)'" <gtbl@dynegy.com>, "'Jan Smutny-Jones (E-mail)'"
<smutny@iepa.com>, "'Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)'" <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>,
"'Joe Ronan (E-mail)'" <joer@calpine.com>, "'John Larrea (E-mail)'"
<john.g.larrea@williams.com>, "'John Stout (E-mail)'"
<John_H_Stout@reliantenergy.com>, "'Julee Malinowski-Ball (E-mail)'"
<jmball@ns.net>, "'Kassandra Gough (E-mail)'" <kgough@calpine.com>, "'kent
Palmerton (E-mail)'" <kent.palmerton@williams.com>, "'Lynn Lednicky
(E-mail)'" <lale@dynegy.com>, "Marie Moretti (E-mail 2)"
<mmoretti@mccabeandcompany.net>, "'Marty Wilson (E-mail)'"
<mwilson@pstrategies.com>, "'McNally Ray (E-mail)'"
<rmcnally@mcnallytemple.com>, "''Nam Nguyen' (E-mail)'"
<nam.nguyen@powersrc.com>, "'Norton Kelli (E-mail)'"
<knorton@mcnallytemple.com>, "'Paula Hall-Collins (E-mail)'"
<paula.hall-collins@williams.com>, "'Pigott Jack (E-mail)'"
<jackp@calpine.com>, "'Richard Hyde (E-mail)'" <rwhyde@duke-energy.com>,
"'Roger Pelote (E-mail)'" <roger.pelote@williams.com>, "'Stephanie-Newell
(E-mail)'" <stephanie-newell@reliantenergy.com>, "'Sue Mara (E-mail)'"
<smara@enron.com>, "'Tom Ross (E-mail)'" <tross@mcnallytemple.com>, "Tom
Williams (E-mail)" <tcwillia@duke-energy.com>, "'Alex Sugaoka (E-mail)'"
<alex.sugaoka@uaecorp.com>, "'Bill Carlson (E-mail)'"
<william_carlson@wastemanagement.com>, "'Bill Woods (E-mail)'"
<billw@calpine.com>, "'Bob Ellery (E-mail)'" <bellery@spi-ind.com>, "'Bob
Gates (E-mail)'" <bob.gates@enron.com>, "'Cody Carter (E-mail)'"
<cody.carter@williams.com>, "'Curt Hatton (E-mail)'"
<Curt.Hatton@gen.pge.com>, "'David Parquet'" <david.parquet@enron.com>,
"'Dean Gosselin (E-mail)'" <dean_gosselin@fpl.com>, "'Doug Fernley (E-mail)'"
<fernley.doug@epenergy.com>, "'Duane Nelsen (E-mail)'"
<dnelsen@gwfpower.com>, "'Ed Tomeo (E-mail)'" <ed.tomeo@uaecorp.com>,
"'Eileen Koch (E-mail)'" <eileenk@calpine.com>, "'Eric Eisenman (E-mail)'"
<eric.eisenman@gen.pge.com>, "'Frank DeRosa (E-mail)'"
<frank.derosa@gen.pge.com>, "Frazier Blaylock (E-mail)"
<frazier_blaylock@ogden-energy.com>, "'Hap Boyd (E-mail)'"
<Hap_Boyd@enron.com>, "'Hawks Jack (E-mail)'" <jack.hawks@gen.pge.com>, "'Jim
Willey (E-mail)'" <elliottsa@earthlink.net>, "'Joe Greco (E-mail)'"
<jgreco@caithnessenergy.com>, "'Jonathan Weisgall (E-mail)'"
<jweisgall@aol.com>, "'Kate Castillo (E-mail)'" <CCastillo@riobravo-gm.com>,
"'Kelly Lloyd (E-mail)'" <kellyl@enxco.com>, "'Ken Hoffman (E-mail)'"
<khoffman@caithnessenergy.com>, "'Kent Fickett (E-mail)'"
<kfickett@usgen.com>, "'Lynn Lednicky (E-mail)'"
<lynn.a.lednicky@dynegy.com>, "'Marty McFadden (E-mail)'"
<marty_mcfadden@ogden-energy.com>, "'Paula Soos'"
<paula_soos@ogden-energy.com>, "'Randy Hickok (E-mail)'"
<rjhickok@duke-energy.com>, "Rick S. Koebbe (E-mail)"
<rskoebbe@powerworksinc.com>, "'Rob Lamkin (E-mail)'"
<rllamkin@seiworldwide.com>, "'Ross Ain (E-mail)'" <ain@worldnet.att.net>,
"'Steve Iliff'" <siliff@riobravo-gm.com>, "'Steve Ponder (E-mail)'"
<steve_ponder@fpl.com>, "'Tony Wetzel (E-mail)'" <twetzel@thermoecotek.com>,
"'William Hall (E-mail)'" <wfhall2@duke-energy.com>,
<trusso@mcnallytemple.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Initiative Campaign Strategy Outline

The following memo is for discussion during our Wednesday public affairs
committee meeting.
Thanks!  Jean

March 26, 2001

MEMORANDUM

To:    IEP
Fr:     Ray McNally, Richard Temple, Tony Russo, Jean Munoz, Tom Ross
Re:   Initiative Campaign Strategy Outline

Harvey Rosenfield has on numerous occasions threatened to place an initiative
on the 2002 ballot to re-regulate the power industry.

It is not a hollow threat.

Not only has Rosenfield successfully placed initiatives on the ballot in the
past, but the current energy crisis has become the number one issue on the
minds of voters dd making it easier to qualify a ballot measure.  And our own
internal polling for IEP shows voters would initially support the concept of
re-regulating the industry.

However, qualifying an initiative for next year?s election is not a foregone
conclusion.  And passing one is an even more difficult task.

Rosenfield faces several roadblocks:

o    The current energy issue is complicated, and all potential solutions
have weaknesses that could be exploited in a political campaign.

o    IEP?s internal polling shows Rosenfield?s proposal has weaknesses that
could be exploited dd including the price tag and the image of a state-run
energy department that could be compared to the DMV and CalTrans.

o    Rosenfield would have a difficult time funding a campaign, especially
raising the resources to overcome a strong, well funded "no" campaign.

o    The burden of "proof" always falls on the "yes" campaign rather than the
"no" campaign.  Voters are concerned about giving their approval to changes
that could make things worse.  Rosenfield will have to prove his case beyond
a shadow of a doubt, and therefore it is easier to defeat an initiative than
it is to pass one.

o    If power generators become motivated they can be a formidable opponent.

Following is (1) a preliminary timeline Rosenfield would face in trying to
qualify an initiative for the ballot in 2002, (2) strategic concepts that
should be considered before pursuing a plan to defeat the initiative, (3)
preliminary strategic and tactical options in opposing the initiative, and
(4) a discussion of campaign costs.

We recommend using this outline as a starting point to develop an effective
campaign plan that could successfully defeat Rosenfield if he pursues an
initiative strategy.

Timeline

To date, no proposed ballot initiative has been submitted to the Attorney
General for title and summary.  Accordingly, there is not sufficient time
available to qualify an initiative for the March 2002 ballot.

However, there is still adequate time to qualify a measure for the November
2002 ballot.  We believe Rosenfield could submit a measure to the Attorney
General as late as September, 2001 and still qualify the initiative for the
November 2002 ballot dd especially if the summer months produce power
blackouts, skyrocketing energy bills, and the image of a bungling Governor,
legislature and regulators.

The following timeline would allow Rosenfield to submit language for title
and summary as late as September 28, 2001 and qualify the initiative for the
November 2002 ballot:

September 28, 2001

Proposed measure is submitted to the AG for title and summary.

November 20, 2001

Attorney General prepares and issues title and summary.  Proponent can begin
circulating petitions.

April 19, 2002

The proponent files the petitions with county elections officials.

May 1, 2002

County elections officials complete petition raw count totals and certify raw
numbers to the Secretary of State.

June 23, 2002

County elections officials verify and certify results of the number of valid
signatures in their counties and turn in counts to the Secretary of State.

June 27, 2002

Secretary of State determines if the initiative qualifies for the ballot.
Proponent needs 670,816 valid signatures to qualify a constitutional
amendment or 419,260 valid signatures to qualify a straight statute.

Strategic Concepts

There are several strategic concepts that should be reviewed:

o    While satisfying Rosenfield may be impossible, IEP could push hard to
ensure a "solution" is passed by the legislature to give credibility to the
criticism that Rosenfield is an extremist whose initiative could undercut the
legislative remedy.

o    The industry could organize a well-funded campaign that contains an
early advertising blitz to quickly define the ballot measure in the most
negative manner possible, and that delivers a knock out punch in October.

o    Generators could promote a counter-initiative proposal, either through
the legislature or qualified by petition dd stopping Rosenfield?s proposal if
more "yes" votes are received for the counter initiative than the Rosenfield
measure.

o    Paid signature gathering firms could be put on contract for
industry-related business dd thus keeping these firms off the table for
Rosenfield.  Another variation would be to hire firms to gather signatures
calling for legislative action dd thus gaining names of voters who support
our position, but also keeping signature gatherers too busy to help
Rosenfileld.

o    The industry could pay to gather signatures on petitions that removes
names of people who may have signed the petition for Rosenfield?s
initiative.  This could cut down the number of valid signatures accepted by
county election officials.

o    A paid advertising campaign could be run during the proposal?s signature
gathering phase urging voters not to sign the petitions.  An added benefit of
the concept is defining the proposal early if it still qualifies for the
ballot.

o    We could organize a legal assault on the proposal dd stopping their
signature gathering efforts or keeping it off the ballot.

Campaign Strategy

If the proposal qualifies for the ballot, the industry must pursue an
aggressive strategy to defeat the measure.  We need to identify weaknesses in
the proposal and share those weaknesses with voters.  We must also push
voters to question the motives behind the initiative.  We need to make sure
voters are uncomfortable with all or portions of the initiative to ensure
they vote no despite wanting adequate and affordable energy.

The campaign should conduct thorough research to determine the best strategy
to defeat the measure.  Initially we believe the "no" campaign should focus
on testing and developing the following messages:

o    The measure will hurt taxpayers.  A $40 billion price tag is too much
for voters to accept as the only solution to the problem.

o    The proposal will hurt public services.  The cost of Rosenfield?s
measure will keep money away from more important programs  dd like schools,
public safety and programs for children and seniors.

o    The ballot measure is simply a way for elected officials to get more tax
dollars to cover up their failures dd and they should not be rewarded with
public support.

o    Rosenfield?s proposal will result in higher taxes to pay for more
bureaucracy and wasted tax dollars.

o    The proposal will result in more inefficient government that will
produce unreliable power dd hurting consumers, and vital services such as
hospitals and public safety.

o    The measure will hurt the economy and cost jobs at a time when the
economy is hurting.

Campaign Tactics

The campaign should follow an aggressive battleplan that includes the
following components:

Research

Focus groups and quantitative surveys should be conducted to help craft the
best messages to attack the proposal.  This research would also be important
in efforts to secure the most favorable ballot title and summary possible to
our goal of defeating it.

Demographic and election research should also be conducted to determine
voters most open to our campaign messages.  We should also conduct thorough
research on Rosenfield to expose his true motivations for proposing this
measure and its inherent weaknesses.

Legal, Title & Summary, and Ballot Argument Challenges

We should pursue every possible legal option to either get the proposal off
the ballot, or ensure the most favorable title & summary and weakened ballot
arguments for the initiative sponsors.  Our experience shows that the ballot
title and summary can swing initial vote margins either way by as much as 10
points.

Paid Advertising

Statewide campaigns in California require paid advertising dd including
electronic media, direct mail, and telemarketing.  Advertising should be
carefully targeted to ensure the most "bang for the buck."

Earned Media

Editorial support is an important part of successful statewide campaigns, as
is ensuring favorable media coverage of the campaign.  A focused earned media
campaign would greatly enhance the chances for success and editorial support
and Op-Ed?s can provide important third party credibility to the no campaign.

Coalition Building

It will be critical for the industry to gain credible allies in its fight
against Rosenfield.  We do not want the campaign to be portrayed as
generators versus consumer groups.  Therefore, we need credible, third party
groups standing along side us to broaden our appeal and message, like
taxpayer groups, business leaders, consumer organizations, energy experts,
economists, educators, law enforcement and seniors.

Campaign Costs

How much will be needed to defeat Rosenfield will depend on several factors.
Depending on several variables, the cost of a "no" campaign can range from a
few million dollars to as much as the $40 million spent to defeat Proposition
9.

Campaign costs to defeat ballot measures are contingent upon several
variables:

o    The popularity of the measure with voters.  The more they like it on the
natural, the more expensive it will be to defeat the measure.

o    How much money Rosenfield can raise to promote the measure.  If he has
few resources, the "no" campaign will have an uncontested paid advertising
campaign, which will make defeating the proposal much easier.

o    How bad the energy crisis impacts voters.  If the next 15 months produce
an on-going crisis, campaign costs will rise.

o    The effectiveness of messages against the proposal.  If focus group and
survey research confirm the proposal has an Achilles heel, the cost to defeat
the measure will go down dramatically.

Thorough research of Rosenfield?s actual proposal will better enable us to
recommend a campaign plan, message and budget.  In summary, defeating the
Rosenfield initiative will cost from a few to several million dollars and a
united industry effort.


please put on calendar
----- Forwarded by Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT on 04/09/2001 01:47 PM -----

	Sarah Novosel@ENRON
	04/09/2001 12:31 PM

		 To: Mark Dana Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom May/Corp/Enron@Enron, Janelle
Scheuer/Enron@EnronXGate, Chip Schneider/Enron@EnronXGate, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christi L
Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kathleen Sullivan/NA/Enron@ENRON, Rick
Whitaker/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Tuesday Meeting to Discuss New York

We have reserved Room 3125B for our meeting to discuss New York power issues
on Tuesday, April 10 at 3:00 pm.   If time permits, I will send out an agenda
before the meeting.  Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks

Sarah


John Anderson PTC/NERC
Brad Petzold
Power Nav -- John Henry (202) 466-0547


I am forwarding you Heather's workproduct on outstanding issuse. If that are
legal or other issues that you are aware of that would negatively impact or
delay the closing of the ALAMAC transaction beyond the January 19th drop dead
date, please let me know ASAP.

Thanks

Steve
----- Forwarded by Steve Van Hooser/HOU/ECT on 01/08/01 07:47 AM -----

	Heather Kroll
	01/07/01 03:59 PM

		 To: Dwight Beach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ozzie Pagan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Glenn
Wright/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steve Van Hooser/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Outstanding Issues

To all:

I've put together a list of outstanding issues that need to be resolved prior
to the Jan 19 closing.  Let me know if I've forgotten anything.

I'll be out of the office Monday through Wednesday, but can be reached by my
cell phone (713.569.1131) or pager (888.472.7841).  Also, I'll be working out
of the NY office all day on Tuesday.

Regards,

Heather


- marks.xls


FYI

Vince
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/18/2000
10:00 AM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp. - Europe

	From:  Nick Mooney                           04/18/2000 09:09 AM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mark Tawney/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Video Conference with Ross McIntyre

Vince,

you should have received an invitation through lotus notes which outlines the
VC location for the conference call tomorrow.  It is schedule for 4:30pm UK
time (10:30am Houston time)

Ross's background is from Investment banking ex Dresner bank, he has a PhD in
Mathematical and is currently with speedwell weather derivatives where he has
been developing weather derivative pricing and portfolio optimisation tools
which they have been marketing to end-users with weather risks.
The attached word documents are articles that he has written for publication.

regards
Nick Mooney

 - MCS.doc
 - Analytic.doc
 - PAR.doc


Please let me know how Gail is?

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Since to bulk of these will be used for employees, I'd like to try and get 20-plus tickets through Deb---not hospitality ones.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Armstrong, Julie
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 3:32 PM
To:	McCarty, Danny
Subject:	Big 12

Danny:

If we want individual tickets, we should make the request through Deb.  $60.00 and $70.00 range.

Otherwise, please see the Group Ticket packages.

Bronze $4000 = $200 per ticket
http://www.swbellcottonbowl.org/big12/tickets/Big%2012%20Group%20Ticket%20Order%20Form.pdf

Web site shows $60 & $40 tickets are sold out.
http://www.swbellcottonbowl.org/big12/tickets/#

No tickets are available (at this time) on the Huskers web site.

Please advise.


FYI

-----Original Message-----
From: Hayslett, Rod
Sent: Sat 11/24/2001 11:41 AM
To: Donoho, Lindy; Lokay, Michelle
Cc: Kleb, Steve; Geaccone, Tracy
Subject: FW: Tw

Can either of you help me here?

-----Original Message-----
From: Hayslett, Rod
Sent: Sat 11/24/2001 11:33 AM
To: Geaccone, Tracy
Cc: Taylor, Sarah; Desai, Jayshree
Subject: Tw

There are files that back up the revenue projections that Steve Kleb gave me hard copies of for 2001 and 2002.  Can I get electronic copies of these, they have volumes and margins and appear to back up the revenue projections.

2002 File looks like s\marketing\twfinmkt_anly\Tw\twfin\2001\misc\[plan_forecast_design.xls]\summary.

2001 file looks like s\marketing\twfinmkt_anly\tw\twfin\2001\forecast-CE\[ce 3-2001.xls]model _source_data.

If the same exists for 2000 can we get it as well.  I would like as soon as possible and you can email to the cc addresses as well.
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


Mark;

good set of data, please proceed. I shall work with this  set of data for now
and see later if we need to get anything else.

thanks
nagwa

Mark Fisher
05/20/2002 11:12 AM
To: Nagwa Elkachouty/EWC/Enron@Enron
cc: Hollis Kimbrough/EWC/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Trent Mesa Gen/Temp data

Nagwa,

I'm attaching a sample of the output of your request (one turbine, #001).
Please make sure all the fields you need are here.

The logic I used is as follows

(1) Find the moving average of Power (KW) using a 50 minute (5 record)
interval.
(2) For all 10-minute records where the moving average is >= 1490 find the
maximum amb. temp.
(3) Find a record where both conditions are true, high temp/high power. I
added a marker (=1) for the selected record
(4) Make table +/- 12 hours from the marked record (should have close to 144
records).

If either the logic or the fields selected need adjustment let me know.

Mark Fisher


No thanks necessary.  My pleasure.  Hope that it helped.  What was the gist
of his comments regarding the gas side?

Best,
Jeff

	Rob Bradley
	04/25/2001 03:43 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Gas Bullets

Thanks for all your help with this--glad your attention is focused on it.
Ken was prepared and talked a bit about the gas side at this lunch speech.

Thanks again,

- Rob


The deals were entered yesterday -

461029
Williams

461030
EES

Thanks

Kerri Thompson@ENRON
11/17/2000 07:04 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: apb checkout

still waiting on these 2 deals.

Kerri Thompson
11/16/2000 04:10 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: apb checkout

missing deals

jeff r
selling williams
20-30th
25 mw
sp15
115.00
on peak

jeff r
buying ees
20-30th
25 mw
sp15
114.95
on peak

tom a
buying koch
20-30
25 mw
114.00
palo
on peak


Greg,

This notice can only be sent to two email addresses.  I think we should try the internal routing address like you suggested.  Let us know what that address is and we'll get you set up.

Thanks!
Vernon

-----Original Message-----
From: Greg_Hathaway@dom.com [mailto:Greg_Hathaway@dom.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 8:52 AM
To: Mercaldo, Vernon
Cc: Hillary_Dryselius@dom.com; Jason_J_Lewis@dom.com;
Mark_J_DeCarlo@dom.com; Stacy_Lee@dom.com
Subject: Could you please....

Vernon:
We get this report from your operations group and  I was wondering if you could
please forward this request to the correct person for the addition of a couple
of people.  I think there is a limit so please let me know how many people can
be on the list and we might be able to create an internal address that would
forward to each of us.  Here are the people that need to be on the list:

Greg_Hathaway@dom.com- on the email
Mark_Moyer@dom.com- on the email
Hillary_Dryselius@dom.com- I believe on the list
Jason_J_Lewis@dom.com- not on the list
Mark_J_DeCarlo@dom.com- not on the list
Stacy_Lee@dom.com- not sure if she is on the list
MWVPEM@hotmail.com- not sure on the list, but for weekend notices

Thanks

Greg

----- Forwarded by Greg Hathaway/WP/VANCPOWER on 10/18/01 09:41 AM -----
|--------+----------------------->
|        |          nng@enron.com|
|        |                       |
|        |          09/05/01     |
|        |          10:14 AM     |
|        |                       |
|--------+----------------------->
  >----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |                                                                            |
  |       To:     greg_hathaway@dom.com                                        |
  |       cc:                                                                  |
  |       Subject:     SchdQty,20010905,NNG,784158214                          |
  >----------------------------------------------------------------------------|

       Contract:   K# 107706  K# 107727  K# 107707
       GasDate: September 5, 2001
       Cycle:  Non Grid AM

 *******K# 107706 ********
  Nom. Rec. Qty:       45499    Nom. Del. Qty:        45499
  Sch. Rec. Qty:       45070    Sch. Del. Qty:        45070

         Rec. Diff:           429           Del. Diff:            429

 *******K# 107727 ********
  Nom. Rec. Qty:           0    Nom. Del. Qty:         3896
  Sch. Rec. Qty:           0    Sch. Del. Qty:         3543

         Rec. Diff:             0           Del. Diff:            353

 *******K# 107707 ********
  Nom. Rec. Qty:       45894    Nom. Del. Qty:        45894
  Sch. Rec. Qty:       45541    Sch. Del. Qty:        43143

         Rec. Diff:           353           Del. Diff:           2751


I am definitely interested in the parking space at the Met.  Please let me
know if it is still possible for me to acquire a space.

Thanks,
Susan Scott


Kim, Jan, Suzanne, and Tori-

This is just a very slight revision to my erlier August Nominations e-mail.
If you look below the sum of the various contracts add up to
17,033MMBtu/day.  Thus, the total nomination for month of August 2001 is
17,033MMBtu per day.  This odd number is made up of the sum of the
following:

1. 4,033MMBtu/day purchase from Engage @ Malin (net, after PG&ENW  losses
4,127MMBtu/day @ Kingsgate);
2. 3,000MMBtu/day APEA gas;
3. 1,000MMBtu/day balance of year strip purchased on behalf of Azusa @
$7.71/MMBtu;
4. 2,000MMBtu/day under two separate fixed contracts of 1,000MMBtu/day each;
5. 500MMBtu/day March 2001 through Feb strip purchased @ $7.63;
6. 2,000MMBtu/day under two July - October separate fixed contracts of
1,000MMBtu/day each;
7. 2,000MMBtu/day under the latest July - Ocober fixed contract; and
8  2,500MMBtu/day under a Q3 contract @ $8.925/MMBtu that we had forgotten
about earlier...

Losses on the PG & E line are unchanged from July 2001 at 2.27%.  We have
not sold any of the APEA gas (3,000MMBtu/day)at this time.

We are still waiting (and waiting, and waiting) for, and fully expect,
temperatures and thus generation to rise next month.  One steam unit
(Broadway 3) is on line and a second one is on hot stand-by.

Sorry for the error.  If you have any questions, please contact me.

Thanks.

-Steve


Fyi
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)

-----Original Message-----
From: Hodge, Jeffrey T. <Jeffrey.T.Hodge@ENRON.com>
To: McCoppin, Dorothy <Dorothy.McCoppin@ENRON.com>
CC: Hayslett, Rod <Rod.Hayslett@ENRON.com>
Sent: Thu Nov 15 08:40:46 2001
Subject: Duke

Dorothy:

	I am dropping you this e-mail at the request of Rod Hayslett and in response to your voice mail message to him concerning the status of the price redetermination under the LNG contract with Duke.  The parties reached settlement on this issue about a week before arbitration.  The new price beginning September 1 is 92.5% of the Equivalent MMBtu Price of No. 6 Fuel Oil less $0.25 per
MMBtu.  Of course, the other provisions of the contract,  such as the ceiling price, the floor price and the bank provisions,  remain.

	I trust that makes some semblance of sense.  If you have additional questions, please call.

Jeff


Dear Mr. Casamento,

We are in receipt of your letter dated December 6, 2000, addressed to Mr.
Jeffrey Skilling regarding the above opportunity.  Your letter stated that
you had also written to Mr. Mark Palmer, among others, at Enron.

Please be advised that Mr. Palmer is the appropriate person at Enron with
whom to speak regarding this matter.

Thank you and happy holidays.

Regards,
Sherri Sera
Assistant to Jeff Skilling
713.853.5984
713.646.8381 (fax)
sherri.sera@enron.com


Following please find the Daily EnronOnline Executive Summary.

EnronOnline Executive Summary for 12/11/00
Transaction Summary
External Transactions Today	3,781
Average Daily External Transactions (30 day Trailing Avg)	4,357
Total Life to Date Transactions	515,690

EnronOnline Daily % of Entity's Total Transactions for 12/11/00	Trans	Percent
Enron North America	2,932	77%
Enron Europe Limited	171	35%
Global Products	195	36%
Enron Metals	483	15%

EnronOnline Percentage of Total Corporate Transactions
(30 day Trailing Avg)	55%

Gross Notional Value of EnronOnline Transactions	Total
Today	2,754,492,066
MTD	30,628,446,748
LTD	309,798,863,793
Average Daily Notional Value (30 Day Trailing Avg)	3,411,749,354

Notional Revenue from Physical Flows to Date	20,508,644,681

Counterparties, Users, and Products Offered
Counterparties having transacted to date	603
New Counterparties transacting for the first time today	1
Number of Products Offered Today	1,107
Total Number of External Users Logged on Today	3,328
Average # of External Users logged on (30 day Trailing Avg)	2,963


Final Reminder

If you are a participant in the Enron Corp. Savings Plan, all trades among your investment funds must be completed by 3:00 PM CST Friday, October 26.

The makeup of your investment funds in the Savings Plan at 3:00 p.m., October 26, will reflect your investment decision for the duration of the transition period.


I had vacation on September 28th (Friday).

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Robertson, Audrey
Sent:	Thursday, September 27, 2001 3:40 PM
To:	Donoho, Lindy; Lindberg, Lorraine; Lohman, TK; Lokay, Michelle; McConnell, Mark; Paul Y'barbo (E-mail); Watson, Kimberly
Subject:	Time Reports are Due Tomorrow

Please submit.

adr

Audrey D. Robertson
Transwestern Pipeline Company
email address:  audrey.robertson@enron.com
(713) 853-5849
(713) 646-2551 Fax


Hi Mark,

...further to my email, I have since heard from the Compliance VP at MG in
New York, who confirmed in the affirmative both of my questions.

all the best

justin

---------------------- Forwarded by Justin Boyd/LON/ECT on 08/08/2000 13:17
---------------------------

Justin Boyd
08/08/2000 07:57
To: Alfred Pennisi/NYC/MGUSA@MGUSA, Jon Barrett/MGLTD_London/MGLTD@MGLTD
cc:

Subject: Execution of NYMEX Trades

Al, Jon,

Please see below.  I had a couple of questions:

I assume that the MG entity will be MG London Inc.?
the Enron Corp Guaranty would be in favour of whom, presumably NYMEX?

Thanks.
Justin

---------------------- Forwarded by Justin Boyd/LON/ECT on 08/08/2000 07:53
---------------------------

Bill Appleby
07/08/2000 19:44
To: Anne Edgley/LON/ECT@ECT, Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: NYMEX

Don't know if you are aware but Enron are currently executing NYMEX trades
through different 3rd party brokers, and it is now proposed that they put all
their trades through MG (who are brokers to NYMEX).  In order to do this, the
New York operation will need:

An unconditional Corp guarantee for $28 million.
In due course further capital, probably in the form of a sub loan.

In the short term, they will be able to migrate 1 or 2 of their existing
brokerage accounts with just the guarantee.  Anne - can you run this by Ben?

FYI the guy running this out of NY is called Al Pennisi (212 715 5845).

This is currently being handled in Houston by Brent Price and David Dupre.

Rgds

Bill


hey fool, why don't you let me send it and get paid - I will cut you a
slice.  Moscoso does the DPR, he does not do risk.
PL


Great - we will look forward to seeing you on the 13th and 14th.  I will work
on an agenda this week, and will send you something later in the week.
--Sally

Beth Apollo
10/30/2000 09:43 AM
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Janine Treader/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Houston trip

Hey there -- hope the weekend was good.  I think I will still plan to come --
as I can handle some of my personal things re: moving home -- house etc.  on
Thursday Friday and meet up with others on Wed.

So ---- go ahead and pencil me in for Mon and Tuesday the 13th and 14th.

I will assume that you and Patti will mostly fill my calendar on those two
days, so will have Janine put other meetings the rest of that week.

Will check on the agenda next week, before I leave London.

Thanks

Beth

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Sally Beck                           27/10/2000 21:34

To: Beth Apollo/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Houston trip

The week of November 13 is the week of the Enron Management Conference in San
Antonio.  It begins on Wednesday evening, so most people will be travelling
on Wednesday afternoon.  I will be in the office on Monday and Tuesday that
week, so those days work well for me for your visit.   I just wanted you to
know about the conference in case that has an impact on other meetings that
you might want to have in Houston that week.  Let me know.  I will look
forward to seeing you and introducing you to others on the team.

We are looking forward to seeing Mo next week here in Houston.

Have a great weekend.  --Sally

Beth Apollo
10/24/2000 09:27 AM
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Houston trip

Hi there --- Had lunch with Mo today  -- so as you can imagine she was very
interested in my new role, working with you.  Fernley has decided that it is
too hard to write down all of the organizational changes and how it affects
all of the people who reported in to Phillip and I, so he has just verbally
announced the changes.  But, at any rate, the word is getting out.

I hadn't seen Mo in months, so it was good to catch up.  I think she is
headed to Houston this week (so is Frank) so I am sure you will be hearing
from her.

I have tentatively blocked out the week beginning Monday, Nov. 13th to come
over to Houston, and would like to spend some of that time with you and your
team, meeting people, and maybe just following you around for the day, as you
suggested.

Does that week work for you?  I think the Management conference is later in
the month, so people will generally be around.

Please let me know, and I will make sure it happens.  I will also need to
spend some time with Melissa Becker and her team working on Post ASE
Reporting solutions, but will plan to spend a significant amount of time with
the North America group.

What do you think?  I am ready to get moving on some new things!!!!

Beth


Any GCP adjustments will be highlighted in dark red.

Best Rgds.

Samuel Schott
(713) 853-9890 (GCP Team)
(Enron Net Works _ Global Data Management)

From: Aparna Rajaram/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/06/2001 02:44 PM
To: Kelly Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron, Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice
Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill D Hare/HOU/ECT@ect, Steve Venturatos/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Camille Gerard/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya
Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Tom Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ken Curry/ENRON@enronXgate, Nicole
Hunter/NA/Enron@Enron, Lesli Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate, Karen
Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Click Paper Approvals, 04-06-01

Please see attached.

Aparna Rajaram
Ph: (713) 345-4563
Fax: (713) 853-9476
Aparna.Rajaram@enron.com


Is it possible that the Gas Daily swaps that you set up for the west are not
mapped for our other gas dailly locations??

That may be the cause of some of our confusion


Nice job on the postcard.  I will get you an answer on the mailout tomorrow
morning.  Let me know if you hear anything from EOL regarding the new version.

Thanks,
Mike Grigsby


---------------------- Forwarded by Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT on 11/01/2000 11:58
AM ---------------------------

	From:  George Smith                           11/01/2000 11:23 AM

To: Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: SEXUAL HARASSMENT

Does this bring anybody to mind?
---------------------- Forwarded by George Smith/HOU/ECT on 11/01/2000 11:22
AM ---------------------------

Charles T Muzzy
11/01/2000 11:10 AM
To: Mark L Schrab/HOU/ECT@ECT, George Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT,
rhonda.smith@enron.com
cc:
Subject: SEXUAL HARASSMENT

---------------------- Forwarded by Charles T Muzzy/HOU/ECT on 11/01/2000
11:09 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Dolores Muzzy                           11/01/2000 09:54 AM

To: Charles T Muzzy/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: SEXUAL HARASSMENT

 - How to discourage harassment in the office.mpg


John:

I will get on your calender in January when I am over.  It is also my
understanding, for the credit trading business you are developing, that
Chinese walls are not necessary.  But it will be necesary to address if
equity trading starts up.  Also, there are probably related issues, like
restricted lists and the like, that could apply to credit trading.  Hope you
have time to enjoy the Holidays.  Take care.


Hey Guys.

Be cautious when doing a NP/MALIN BR even when the person has Grand-fathered
rights at the tie. Sunday morning the ISO cut my sale to DYNEGY as well as my
purchase from SCEM so that my schedule would not flow. They do this as they
cannot cut the GF transmission. As soon as someone schedules on the GF rights
they get a call from the ISO asking about the transaction, they can then act
accordingly to avoid the export to happen. They hacked my entire 100MW on
Sunday morning for some hours.

So if you try this deal in the next couple of days, do it in a moderate size.
Dynegy will also maybe a little hesitant to do much more than 25MW until this
issue is solved.

Geir


Attached is the October 24th South American DPR.

Attached is theDaily P/L Summary of   $     4,000

South America Trading	              $      4,000

Argentina Power Total:	              $      6,000

	Power Trading
		Rho & Drift	              $     1,000
		Price Actuals		  $     4,000
					 ------------------
				              $     5,000

	Modesto Maranzana Plant
		Rho & Drift		  $     1,000
		Price Actuals		  $           0
				             -------------------
				              $     1,000

Brazil Power Total:		 $       8,000

		Rho & Drift		 $       8,000
		          			-------------------
		Total			 $       8,000

Argentina Gas Total:   	            ($       9,000)

		Intramonth Book:
		    Vol Updates              ($        9,000)
					-------------------
		Total			($        9,000)

Modesto Maranzana Plant:	  $          0

Modesto Maranzana Plant Mgr:	  $          0

Regards,

Patricia Rivera


|--|

                                                                    |  |

                                                                    |  |

                                                                    |  |

                                                                    |--|

                                                                   |---|

                                                                   |   |

                                                                   |   |

                                                                   |   |

                                                                   | - |

                                                                   | 3 |

                                                                   | - |

                                                                   |   |

                                                                   |---|

             Eli Lilly and Company Launches Lillydiabetes.com
          New Web Site Designed To Help Patients Manage Diabetes

 Lillydiabetes.com is valuable resource for the 16 million Americans with
                                 diabetes

Eli Lilly and Company (NYSE: LLY) has launched lillydiabetes.com (

http://www.lillydiabetes.com), an interactive Web site designed to help the

16 million Americans with diabetes and their families understand and manage

the disease and its complications.  The Web site provides patients

information about diabetes and gives them tools to help manage their

disease.

"Diabetes is a progressive, potentially debilitating disease that requires

regular monitoring of blood sugar, blood pressure and weight, among other

things," said Doug Rude, e-commerce team leader, Eli Lilly and Company.

"Lillydiabetes.com can help empower patients and their families with the

information and tools necessary to manage their disease and live healthier

lives."

Lillydiabetes.com has a number of features and tools to encourage

aggressive management of diabetes.  Because diabetes is a chronic,

progressive disease, it is important that patients closely track their

progress toward better blood-sugar control, as well as the development of

diabetes-related complications. Those who register with the site have

access

to customizable "Measures of Control" tools designed to help patients

monitor their diabetes and the complications that can arise.  The Measures

of Control tools include:

?    HbA1c Chart (blood-sugar control) ? Hemoglobin A1c test measures
average blood-sugar levels over a two to three-month period.  Each time an
HbA1c test is done, patients can enter the value and save it as a color
graph, which then can be used to track the patient's progress toward better
blood-sugar control.
?    Height and Weight Index ? Excess body fat can lead to insulin
resistance, a major factor in the development of type 2 diabetes.  This
tool helps patients calculate their body mass index, which is a measure of
body weight relative to height.  The Web site then provides a place to save
that information and chart progress toward desired weight.

?    Blood Pressure Chart ? A common complication of diabetes is high blood
pressure, which can lead to heart disease as well as signal other
potentially serious problems, such as diabetic kidney disease.  This tool
allows patients to enter their blood pressure levels, save them and chart
their progress.

Other resources found on lillydiabetes.com include:

Product Information ? With more than 75 years of innovation in diabetes

care, Eli Lilly and Company has developed many products for the treatment

of diabetes.  This section informs users about treatment options and the

latest breakthroughs.

Lilly Diabetes Today?  Newsletter ? Users can request to receive by e-mail

this newsletter, which provides information about the latest diabetes

developments and research, as well as recipe ideas and inspiring articles.

Patient Check List ? This section provides patients and family members with

a list of issues that should be addressed by their doctor, enabling them to

work with their physician to aggressively manage their disease.

Educational Resources ? Lillydiabetes.com provides information on an array

of diabetes-related topics.  Subject headings include:  About Diabetes,

Diabetes Management, Planning Meals, Diabetes Resources, and Diabetes

Products.

Lilly plans to add new tools and features to the site every 90 days.  The

new features will help equip patients, physicians and other health care

professionals with online tools that improve understanding of the disease

and delivery of care to patients.

Eli Lilly and Company

Lilly, a leading innovation-driven corporation, is developing a growing

portfolio of best-in-class pharmaceutical products by applying the latest

research from its own worldwide laboratories and from collaborations with

eminent scientific organizations. Headquartered in Indianapolis, Ind.,

Lilly provides answers ? through medicines and information ? for some of

the world's most urgent medical needs.

                                #     #   #


zero

	Joseph Alamo
	06/29/2001 04:59 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Friday whereabouts?

hmmmmmmm....still no sign of you at 3 pm...
so....how many vacation hours shall I put you down for then, hmm??
LOL

From: Jeff Dasovich on 06/29/2001 12:12 PM CDT
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: Friday whereabouts?

i  wish.  leaving to return to SF in a little bit.  should be back in town
around 2 PM.

best,
Jeff

	Joseph Alamo
	06/29/2001 12:04 PM

		 To: 9167184@skytel.com, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Friday whereabouts?

JOD - still in Monterey??? didya go to the Acquarium or something??


See if this deal is similar. I also have a copy of the deal ticket if that
will help decipher it. Also, if David Kistler was the Trader - he can tell
you if these are the same transactions.


maybe they're for more sophisticated palates

From: Kim Ward/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/09/2001 02:27 PM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE:

I pawned them off on my unsuspecting coworker - Phil.  He liked them!!

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Arnold, John
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 2:27 PM
To: Ward, Kim S.
Subject: Re:

it's an aquired taste

From: Kim Ward/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/09/2001 02:25 PM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

those things are TERRIBLE!!!!


COMMENTS

Route: 1
 - (Approved) PER CLEVELAND CLIFFS LETTER AGREEMENT, UCU IS ALLOWED TO DECREASE
THEIR MDQ PERIODICALLY.  THEY ARE REDUCING FOR THE MONTH OF DECEMBER.

QUESTIONS:
 JONI BOLLINGER

FOR THROUGHPUT                                           Market Services
                                                         DATE:  Nov 27, 2001
                                                         CR# 22585   / Amnd# 15
                        CONTRACT APPROVAL FORM

NATURE OF CONTRACT: TFX

PARTIES:     Northern Natural Gas Company
             UTILICORP UNITED, INC.

SUMMARY OF PRINCIPAL POINTS:

The contract contains Non-Standard Language.

Total Discount: $0.00

Account Manager: KAREN LAGERSTROM, (402) 398-7508

Approval is required of the departments marked with an asterisk (*).
Contact the account manager for additional information.  Please send approval
or comments to EB4135R, Phone:713-853-6182,  Fax: 713-646-8260   ASAP.

  *Marketing, Account Manager: _______________________________   DATE: _________

  *Marketing, Regional V.P.:   _______________________________   DATE: _________

  *Law, General Counsel:       _______________________________   DATE: _________

  *Regulatory Affairs, V.P.:   _______________________________   DATE: _________

  *Marketing, V.P.:            _______________________________   DATE: _________

________________________________________________________________________
   * Required Signatures


Dear NYTimes.com E-Mail Subscriber,

We'd like to tell you about some exciting new changes
 to our Today's Headlines e-mail service.

On June 19, we will introduce a customizable version of
Today's Headlines that will allow you to choose the number
of headlines you want from any or all of the major sections
of NYTimes.com. The improved Today's Headlines will also
be available in a newly designed HTMLformat and we'll offer
a late edition to keep you up to speed on the day's developing
stories.

Take a look at the new Today's Headlines in HTML format:
http://www.nytimes.com/images/email/todaysheadlines/todaysheadlines.html?stcell=32671&rd=http://172.16.172.122/cgi-bin/gx.cgi/mcp?p=037_Z037_V42KAk012000m1pWr1pb4

To customize your Today's Headlines e-mail on or after
June 19, visit:
http://www.nytimes.com/email?stcell=32671&rd=http://172.16.172.122/cgi-bin/gx.cgi/mcp?p=037_W037_V42KAk012000m1pWr1pb4

Sincerely,
The NYTimes.com Staff

ABOUT THIS E-MAIL
-------------------------------------
You received this e-mail because you are currently subscribed
to "Today's Headlines" or a daily section-front e-mail at NYTimes.com.
As a member of the BBBOnline Privacy Program and the TRUSTe
privacy program, we are committed to protecting your privacy.

To modify your "Today's Headlines" preferences, visit:
http://www.nytimes.com/email

To change your e-mail address, please go to our help center:
http://www.nytimes.com/help

Suggestions and feedback are welcome at:
feedback@nytimes.com


Here is my draft of the demand swap.  Please review and give me any comments
you may have on the structure.  Please note that there is a paragraph that
comes right after the rounding methodology that covers "changes to prices
published or announced".  Do you want me to convert it to "changes to volumes
or amounts published or announced" or do you want me to delete the concept?

Regards,
Brent


--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=DGIRON>
To: 'randy.g.kruger.jr@us.andersen.com@ENRON', SSCHROED@us.ca-indosuez.com
CC: dgiron@enron.com, mikeshaw@andrews-kurth.com, todd.w.taylor@bakernet.com
Date: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 11:31:39 GMT
Subject:

I'm in.  I'll be shredding 'till 11am so I should have plenty of time to make it.

DG

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	randy.g.kruger.jr@us.andersen.com@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 3:32 PM
To:	SSCHROED@us.ca-indosuez.com
Cc:	dgiron@enron.com; mikeshaw@andrews-kurth.com; todd.w.taylor@bakernet.com
Subject:	Re: Lunch 1/24/02

Count me in.  How about Ninfa's over by your office in the tunnels?

To:   dgiron@enron.com, Randy G. Kruger Jr.@ANDERSEN WO,
      mikeshaw@andrews-kurth.com, todd.w.taylor@bakernet.com
cc:
Date: 01/22/2002 10:18 AM
From: SSCHROED@us.ca-indosuez.com
Subject:  Lunch 1/24/02

Let me know if you can still make lunch this Thursday, 1/24/02.  If you
have suggestions for time & place, let me know that as well.

Schroeder

*******************Internet Email Confidentiality Footer*******************

Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message.  If
you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for
delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this
message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly
notify the sender by reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your
employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind.
Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not
relate to the official business of my firm shall be understood as neither
given nor endorsed by it.


Pls get me in on the meetings with Galasinsi and Mcchane. df

Keith Petersen
12/20/2000 07:48 AM
To: Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Gallup Mods

Apparently, someone has told Stan that they can make some changes to the
horsepower and some of the piping and increase thruput by 30 to 50 MMcf/d.
Steve Harris told Drew that the theory had not been proven as of yet.  Steve
was surprised with the announcement.  I'm told that Stan believes that
operationaly we can be ready by the end of the first quarter of 2001.
Apparently Stan has talked with someone at FERC about expidited treatment (I
do not have confirmation on this. It is all hear say.).  Terry Galasinni and
I have a meeting tomorrow (12/21/00 in the PM) to discuss what is happening
and how we are to get the information quicker.

Donna is continuing to work on the 10 MMcf/d expansion.  Once we know exactly
what is happening we will modify our filing to match.

An update on the possibility of moving 20 MMcf/d off the San Juan Lateral and
the cleaning of the lateral.  I have talked with planning and they have
confirmed that if we only flow 850 MMcf/d on the lateral and by cleaning the
line they can increase the suction to the Gallup compressor to 775 psig, the
existing equipment will work to gain the incremental 10 MMcf/d from east of
Thoreau to the California border.  We are going to meet with Bob McChane
today to discuss.

Keith

	From:  Mary Kay Miller                           12/20/2000 07:26 AM

To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Donna Martens/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Keith
Petersen/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Gallup Mods

What changes is Stan talking about?  I saw the article where he talks about a
30-50/per day project-  where did that come from??   MK

Stanley Horton
12/19/2000 06:15 PM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Danny McCarty/ET&S@Enron ., Phil Lowry/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Steven
Harris/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Gallup Mods

Lets make sure we are picking-up on the other ideas Phil has for getting
additional capacity on Tw.  If any of his ideas require regulatory approval
we will probably want to include in the same certificate application.


Has a decision been made about this matter?

thanks, Vicki

From: James Derrick/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/04/2001 10:53 AM
To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: FW: Canadian Retail

Perhaps we could discuss this following the GC meeting tomorrow.  Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Crawford, Sharon   On Behalf Of Keohane, Peter
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 6:15 PM
To: Derrick Jr., James; Haedicke, Mark
Subject: Canadian Retail

Jim and Mark, as you know, we have established a retail affiliate within
Enron Canada known as Enron Direct.  In addition, EES has a Canadian entity,
EES Canada, which was established for the purposes of entering into some
cross-border transactions in Canada.  For various reasons, it has been
decided to roll Enron Direct into EES Canada reporting, commercially, to Rob
Milnthorp, who will in turn report to Dave Delainey.  There are two
legal/governance-related issues that I wanted to raise with you:

1. Governance:  As a result, it will be necessary to make various corporate
re-organizations to EES Canada.  This will include having EES Canada
established as an Alberta corporation, where Enron Canada has, and Enron
Direct will have, its principal Canadian office.  In relation to this, I was
considering that EES Canada should be organized consistent with Enron Canada,
with two Canadian resident nominee directors and Canadian-resident officers.
A few years back, it was decided, for corporate law and, more importantly,
tax-related "permanent establishment" issues, that all directors and officers
of Enron Canada would be Canadian-resident employees of Enron Canada.
Accordingly, Enron Canada was re-organized with a nominee board of directors
consisting of Rob Milnthorp (as the senior commercial employee) and me (as
the senior legal employee) with a Canadian slate of officers being the
Vice-Presidents or Managing Directors in Canada responsible for the various
commercial or commercial-support groups.  I was thinking of doing likewise
with EES Canada.  Although I have not yet obtained a copy of the corporate
records for EES Canada, I believe the current directors of EES Canada are Jim
and an outside lawyer at Blake, Cassels & Graydon in Toronto, Ernest McNee.
I am not sure, but it is also likely that various US-based employees of EES
are designated as the officers of EES Canada.  Would it be appropriate to
re-organize EES Canada along the same lines that Enron Canada has been
organized, or do you have concerns?

2. Law Firm:  Following-up on our conversation last week, I want to confirm
that our continued use of Donahue Ernst & Young for this retail project was
"grandfathered" on the basis that they were "up the learning curve" on a
number of the contracting, regulatory, licensing and market participation
issues.  There is one twist, however, with respect to EES Canada.  Although I
was not involved, I believe that EES Canada was established to execute on
some gas transactions in Ontario with the use of a Blakes partner in Toronto,
Ernest McNee.  However, as the focus of the business initiative in Canada
will, at least in the near future, be more involved and predominantly, if not
entirely, in Alberta; and as Donahue Ernst & Young is involved in regulatory
proceedings on our behalf with respect to market design issues affecting the
Alberta gas and power markets, as well as being familiar with the licensing
and contracting requirements for Enron Direct in Alberta; and given my
understanding that Blakes' involvement with EES Canada has been relatively
limited, I think it would make sense to have Donahue Ernst & Young continue
on with this matter.  I am, however, sensitive to Jim's concerns, and
therefore wanted your thoughts on the matter.

I look forward to hearing from you.

Regards,
Peter


i thought you sniffed that stuff on the weekend for fun anyway


Hi Lynn,

Happy New Year!

I haven't seen the executed agreement come back.  Has it been signed yet?

Thanks,

Kay


Subject: Snow

This had most of the state of Michigan laughing for 2 days and a very
embarrassed female news anchor who will, in the future, likely think
before she speaks.

What happens when you predict snow but don't get any....

True story...we had a female news anchor who, the day after it was
supposed to have snowed and didn't, turned to the weatherman and asked
"So
Bob, where's that 8 inches you promised me last night?"

Not only did HE have to leave the set, but half the crew did too, they
were laughing so hard!


Dear Vince,

I've attached my resume. Thank you so much for your help. I really
appreciate it.

Best regards,

Vicky

>From: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
>To: vjwindsor@hotmail.com
>CC: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
>Subject: Re: From Vicky Windsor
>Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 15:55:57 -0500
>
>
>Vicky,
>
>Please, send me your resume.
>
>I shall forward it to a number of employees of  Enron in London
>with my strongest recommendation. I shall send you  the list
>of names. The resume will make it easier for me to
>identify good targets.
>
>Please, make sure you will contact me if there is no reaction.
>People here are very busy and, as you know, things fall through the cracks.
>
>Vince
>
>
>
>Vince
>
>
>
>
>"Vicky Windsor" <vjwindsor@hotmail.com> on 10/11/2000 04:49:56 AM
>
>To:   vkamins@enron.com
>cc:
>Subject:  From Vicky Windsor
>
>
>Dear Vince,
>
>How are you? Well I hope.
>
>I hope you don't mind me writing to you. You may remember that 5 months ago
>I left Risk Publications and moved to a charity. Having been here for only
>a
>few months, I have decided that this job is not for me (I miss the buzz of
>a
>corporate office) and I have decided to move back into the corporate
>sector.
>
>Because of my previous experience and knowledge of the energy sector, I am
>very interested in moving into this area. I have always thought that it
>would be great to work for Enron because it is such a dynamic company and I
>am planning to approach the London office to discuss any opportunities,
>which might be available. I am particularly interested in product marketing
>and research, although I am very open-minded at the moment. I wondered
>whether you could recommend the right person to speak to in London.
>
>I know that you are incredibly busy, but any help you can give me would be
>fantastic Vince.
>
>Thanks and best regards,
>
>
>Vicky Windsor
>
>_________________________________________________________________________
>Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
>
>Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
>http://profiles.msn.com.
>
>
>
>
>

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.

 - CV to Vince Kaminski 13 Oct.doc


Today we announced the appointment of Jeff McMahon as Enron's chief financial officer.  In my continued discussions with the financial community yesterday and today, it became clear that this move was required to restore investor confidence.  Jeff has unparalleled qualifications and a deep and thorough understanding of Enron.  He is already on the job and hard at work on the issues before us.  Andy Fastow will be on a leave of absence from the company.

Jeff had been serving as chairman and CEO of Enron Industrial Markets. He joined Enron in 1994 and spent three years in the London office as chief financial officer for Enron's European operations.  Upon returning to the U.S., Jeff was executive vice president of finance and treasurer for Enron Corp.  In 2000, he was named president and chief operating officer of Enron Net Works.

I know all of you are concerned about the continuing decline in our share price.  I am too, and we are working very hard to turn it around.  Appointing Jeff as CFO is one important step in that process.  But most of the solution involves just continuing to do our jobs with excellence.  The fundamentals of our business are strong, and I think the market will begin to see that as we continue to perform.

Please join me in giving Jeff your full support, and thank you for all of your continued hard work.


Chris--FYI--are you available for a meeting Thursday, March 30 at 11:00 a.m.
to discuss these issues?  If so, will you ask Kim to get a room for us for
about an hour?

Thanks.

---------------------- Forwarded by Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT on 03/28/2000
12:47 PM ---------------------------

mflewellyn@columbiaenergygroup.com on 03/28/2000 12:34:07 PM
To: " - *colleen.sullivan@enron.com" <colleen.sullivan@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: storage clarification & issues

Colleen,

Attached is an updated storage proxy schedule for COH and AGL showing what our
balance will be as of April 1, 2000.  As always, if you have any questions,
please let me know.  I'm sending a copy of the document to Denny Pick for
signature and will then send it to Jeff Hodge to get signature from Enron.

Aside from the storage issue, there are several other items that we need to
discuss.  Below is a brief description of each.  Please let me know how you
think we could best deal with these - whether it's via phone call or having an
in-person meeting down in your office.

1.  Pricing - I left you a message about this last week.  According to Chris
Germany, all changes to volumes after first-of-the-month must me negotiated.
In the contract, however, it specifically refers to pricing intra-month using
gas daily OR negotiated pricing depending on the timing of the change.

2.  Consistency - During our discussions with Chris, it sounds as though some
pipes are being handled differently than others again as it relates to
intra-month changes.  I'd just like to make sure that we agree on the pricing
mechanism and then apply it consistently.

3.  Local production - Apparently there was local production that John Singer
purchased specifically to back Retail customers, and this production was not
removed from the Wholesale book prior to the sale.  We need to discuss how to
handle this production.

4.  Monthly invoices - We still haven't seen the complete January 2000
invoice.  As I understand it, the demand charges have not all been sent over,
and several items that need to be changed haven't yet been changed.  Also,
Brian Perrone and Charlie Dalphon have indicated that they have requested
back-up documentation on the demand charges, but we still haven't received
anything.

5.  Swap confirmations - For all of the swaps that Clay Deaton put in place
with Enron to keep Retail's existing hedge positions in tact, I still do not
have executed copies of all of the confirmation agreements.  Rich Contos and I
have both called several people about getting a complete set of copies, but we
can't seem to find the right person over there.

Whenever you have time to discuss these, please let me know.

Thanks,

Melissa


I agree that someone should file. Curious if we can send in our message
through EPSA or WPTF?

Mary's last point about the non-ISO and PX markets is a key point.  We need
to keep any FERC action contained to those markets.

Mary - pls submit an RCR.

Jim

	Mary Hain@ECT
	03/20/2001 07:44 PM

		 To: Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@Enron,  Alan Comnes, Joe Hartsoe@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Ray Alvarez/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Donna Fulton, Richard Sanders,
sbishop@gibbs-bruns.com, Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT, steve.c.hall@enron.com,
gfergus@brobeck.com
		 cc: carrrn@bracepatt.com
		 Subject: Emergency Motion of City of San Diego

Due to the risk of wholesale market participants becoming bankrupt and
therefore unable to flow refunds through to customers, the City of San Diego
has asked FERC to direct sellers of wholesale power in the "California"
markets to sequester any amounts collected from sales that are in excess of
costs and to maintain those amounts, with interest, adequate to pay potential
refund obligations.  It also asks FERC to clarify that these amounts are
being retained by the sellers in trust to fulfill refund obligations.

I think we should make the following arguments at FERC:

In the In re Columbia Gas Systems Inc. case relied on by San Diego, FERC had
ordered, and Columbia had received, refunds from upstream pipelines, but had
not specified that Columbia was to hold those refunds in trust for its
customers.  To my knowledge, none of the refunds FERC has recently required
would be paid to EPMI, nor has FERC required EPMI to make any refunds, it has
merely conditioned its rates "subject to refund."  Accordingly, it is
inappropriate for EPMI to be required to sequester any of its profits.
San Diego seeks to apply this requirement to every participant in the market,
although it has not proven that refunds would put EPMI on the verge of
insolvency.  It has simply said that "there is no assurance that the actual
wholesale sellers , , , are capable of paying the refunds that potentially
may be ordered."
San Diego also alleges that the potential refund obligation is immense.  This
allegation is based on San Diego's allegation that the refund liability
calculated by FERC's March 9 order (of $69 million) is vastly understated.
This is suppostion, on supposition, not to mention a collateral attack on the
Commission March 9 order.
The pleading is in essence a request for cost-of service based rates given
that market participants would be deprived of any benefit of participating in
the market for years - "pending a final nonappealable order in these
proceedings."  Therefore, it is a collateral attack on FERC's December 15
order finding that it would not order cost based rates.
This pleading also seeks refunds beyond what could be required pursuant to
FERC's December 15 order in that its would apply sequestering to sellers of
wholesale power "in the California markets" not just for sales in the ISO and
PX markets.


Cordially,
Mary Cook
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith, 38th Floor, Legal
Houston, Texas   77002-7361
(713) 345-7732 (phone)
(713) 646-3490 (fax)
mary.cook@enron.com


1:00 or 1:30 p.m. today is fine for a conference call.

Mark

 - Outline for April 17th handouts.doc


---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 10/17/2000 02:51 PM
---------------------------

Kenneth Horton@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
10/16/2000 05:13 PM
To: Sally Beck@ECT
cc: Lynn Bellinghausen/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Doorstep Meeting

Sally,

Following our Doorstep meeting today, I am following up on your request that
I forward to you the list of Portland transactions for which we still require
documentation, e.g. invoices, SAP entries, etc.  For the Settlements testing
only, we reduced the deal population from 23 to ten randomly-selected
transactions, in order to facilitate the Settlement group's ability to
complete both its monthly close obligations and our Doorstep request.  The
deal selection is indicated in yellow, and the missing items, in green.

Also per your request, attached are the five "non-standard" deals for which
we have been unable to obtain any information at all.  Our primary need is
just to get a basic understanding of these transactions.

Colorado Springs Utilities  10/1/98-9/30/03 Colorado 50-150 MWs
BPA     10/1/01-12/31/05 NW Delivered 105 MWs
Welded Tube    1/1/98-6/30/05 PGE - NW 5.2-12MWs
British Columbia Power Exchange 1/1/98-1/1/15 COB 85-176 MWs
Harbor Cogen

Thank you for your help, Sally,
Ken


Hey, punk!!

Daren and Tonya
5519 Clarkston
Spring Tx, 77379

"Barrera, C. J." <C.J.Barrera@usa.conoco.com> on 01/21/2000 10:56:06 AM
To: "'betsy boring'" <Betsy.Boring@Southernenergy.com>, Daren J
Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, "'Davis, Debbie J.'" <djdavis@coral-energy.com>, "'eddie
lamp'" <eddiel@ccai.attmail.com>, "'gary guess'" <garyg@intermat.com>, Gary A
Hanks/HOU/ECT@ECT, "'Hamilton, Laurie'" <laurie.hamilton@gt.pge.com>,
"'Jackson, Fred'" <Fred_Jackson@kmmktg.com>, "'kelly evans'"
<kevans@coral-energy.com>, Lauri A Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, "'randy ball'"
<bharley91@aol.com>, "'ruben hernandez'" <darksky@flash.net>, "'stacey
woodard'" <Stacey.Woodard@austinenergy.com>, "'tamara bosque'"
<tbosque@kne.com>
cc:
Subject:

Please reply back with your home addresses. Also, if applicable, correct
spelling of your better halves. Thanks.
C.J.


I talked to duran.  Did you mean oxley?
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


no it was a good day.  i was nervous at lunch but i hadn't looked at all the
info.  where did you go run errands at? the galleria?


Please expect a call from Joe Hartsoe in the very near future.  His
background lends itself to our businesses, and he is looking to add some
commercial experience to his c.v.  Thanks for taking the time to meet with
Joe.

Jeff


Greetings All!

As most of you know, there is a Trader Web-site project initiative currently
in progress to identify specific reports that traders have produced every day
and to then automatically publish these reports to a web-site.

We are in the initial stage of collecting requirements from the traders
(identified by Steve Stock) to determine what reports and report information
are to be submitted for publishing on a web-site.  Based on these
discussions, the requirements listed below have been identified so far.
Please review these requirements and let me know if you have any changes or
additional requirements by EOB Tuesday, March 6.  Also, please forward all
report templates, required report information, and security requirements for
your region.  If you are not be able to provide this information by next
Tuesday, please let me know.

Trader Report Web-site Requirements:

1. Need a separate web-site developed and implemented (in the same manner
that the Executive Report Viewer project, which is   being handled by Zhiyong
Wei's team)
2. Web-site to be available 24 hours a day X 7 days a week
3. There are 5 Risk Regions: East, West, Central, Texas, and Financial
4. Each person leads a region as follows:
 Kam Keiser   / East Risk Region
 Darron Giron   / West Risk Region
 Phillip Love  / Central Risk Region
 David Baumbach  / Texas Risk Region
 Errol McLaughlin / Financial Risk Region
5. Jeff Gossett is the Project Lead for Traders
6. There are several traders within each region
7. Security -  All traders should have access within their own region.
Security will need to be set up to only view each trader's  respective region
(or any additional regions identified).  Security requirements need to be
defined and documented by  each region lead, listing the name of each person
that will be able to view what particular region/s reports.
8. All reports are currently in Excel and need a macro to export to the new
web-site (formulas are within the spreadsheets).   Required reports are to be
identified by each region lead, with sample report templates.
9. A total of 15 reports are needed now and need more room for additional
reports to be added in the future
10. Reports are to be automatically exported daily (reports are run each
night) and to be published with "view only" capabilities on  the web-site
11. History - Need to maintain 30 days of history, and also every last day of
each month beginning (starting from) 1/01/01 and  forward

I will be meeting with Zhiyong next week to discuss these requirements, and I
will schedule project meetings as needed going forward.
Please contact me if you have any questions or need additional information.
Thank you for your input and support!!

Shirley McDowell
Project Manager/Trader Web-site


Sally,
FYI, attached is a memo from Valtech who helped us building EOL.  The
architect worked on EOL project is available and he is one of the most
technical and expensive person ($2,000/day which is approximately half of
Diamond group's cost)  who we can use during the start up phase. Thank you.
       Best wishes,
       Inja

---------------------- Forwarded by Inja Chun/HOU/ECT on 10/04/2000 01:25 PM
---------------------------

	Enron Technology

	From:  Inja Chun                           09/25/2000 05:43 PM

To: Thomas D Gros/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Commodity Logic Project

FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Inja Chun/HOU/ECT on 09/25/2000 05:43 PM
---------------------------

Martin Santora <martin.santora@valtech.com> on 09/25/2000 05:29:39 PM
To: "'inja.chun@enron.com'" <inja.chun@enron.com>
cc: "'dan.bruce@enron.com'" <dan.bruce@enron.com>,
"'philippe.a.bibi@enron.com'" <philippe.a.bibi@enron.com>
Subject: Commodity Logic Project

Inja,

Per the conference call today I am confident that we can add value to the
Commodity Logic Project. I base this on the success of Enron Online and
Valtech's role of supporting that effort. Currently, We have the Architect
(David Jayakaran) that designed the presentation framework for EOL available
as part of the team. I mention this because of the obvious synergy between
the EOL framework and Commodity Logic. As discussed David will meet with you
on Wednesday. The action items I owe you are the Enron negotiated rate
structure and profiles for consultants that could start immediately. The
daily rates are senior consultants at $2,000 and consultants at $1,750.  The
profiles are attached for your review. Please contact me if you have any
questions.

Regards,

Martin

Martin Santora
Vice President
Business Development
North America
Valtech Technologies
5080 Spectrum Drive
Suite 1010
West Tower
Dallas, Texas 75001
972-789-6500

 <<David Jayakaran Profile.doc>>  <<Steve Kos Profile.doc>>  <<greg miller
profile.doc>>  <<Sarath Kolla profile.doc>>

 - David Jayakaran Profile.doc
 - Steve Kos Profile.doc
 - greg miller profile.doc
 - Sarath Kolla profile.doc


Talked to Bill Reed.  In his comments, he will say:

FERC should be more prescriptive.  Can't wait for a new board, made of new
people, to act.  FERC needs to be more assertive--I told him we're all for
leadership from FERC.
They will strongly support the end of the buy-sell requirement and express
concern about the CPUC's micromanagement of utility purchases--I told him
we'd have a similar message on that issue.
FERC should "PJM" the California market--I told him we would differ
significantly on that issue, i.e., PJM-ing generaly, and "merging" the PX and
the ISO.
He said his comments on "refunds" would be "narrow" and would point out that
the FERC staff report says there is evidence of specific "bad actors" and
that those bad actors should be required to give refunds--I told him that our
position hasn't changed on retroactive ratemaking.
I explained our position on getting more information to the market sooner.
He said that it sounds like a good idea.
I told him about our message on price caps.  He said that he would stress
that price caps ought to be a temporary "fix," and should be removed just as
soon as the market is "functional."

Steve: I told him he should search you out prior to the start of the panel
tomorrow and talk more.

Best,
Jeff

Best,
Jeff


Here is the DWR revenue requirement, which is good news for creditors.  It is
significantly less on an annual basis, $2.66 B per annum vesus $4.2 B to
$4.4B per annum shown before.  This difference can largely be explained by
the fall-off in spot curves which explains $1.3 B per annum of the decrease.
All eyes will be on the utility's generation rate cases at CPUC on their
retained gen, QF and billaterals.


Walt  will do all in his power to see that we obtain justice on the Todoroff
matter.  We are very confident of our case here.  SWD

	Michael Burke
	06/08/00 04:18 PM

		 To: Walt Zimmerman/Houston/Eott@Eott
		 cc: Dana Gibbs/Houston/Eott@Eott, Lori Maddox/Houston/Eott@Eott, Stanley
Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron, Steve Duffy/Houston/Eott@Eott, Susan
Ralph/Houston/Eott@Eott
		 Subject: Re: Insurance Recovery on Todoroff Matter

Susan, Thanks to you and Walt and all others who worked on this.  Having a
check of that magnitude come to us by June certainly
exceeded my expectations.  And this did not just happen...you folks did an
excellent job of making it happen.

Now Walt, if you can just assure us that in Mr. Todoroff's situation that
justice will be served!

Thanks again.

	Walt Zimmerman
	06/08/00 03:26 PM

		 To: Susan Ralph/Houston/Eott@Eott
		 cc: Michael Burke/Houston/Eott@Eott, Steve Duffy/Houston/Eott@Eott, Dana
Gibbs/Houston/Eott@Eott, Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron, Lori
Maddox/Houston/Eott@Eott
		 Subject: Insurance Recovery on Todoroff Matter

Susan, I spoke this morning with Nancy Manderson (outside counsel for our
crime policy insurer).  She has accepted my changes to the Assignment and
Release, and she will be forwarding an original of the Assignment and Release
to EOTT for execution.  She said we will have our check for $2,503,000.00
next week!  The check will be delivered to Phillip Bair with our insurance
broker.

We also had a long conversation about the insurer's claim against Gas
Producers.  I shared with Nancy some of the research we have done on the
conversion claim against Gas Producers.  I assured her that EOTT would fully
cooperate if the insurer did pursue the claim against Gas Producers.  I
gathered from her comments, however, that the insurer is concerned that Gas
Producers may not have sufficient assets to satisfy anything but a small
judgment.  I do not know whether the insurer has actually conducted a
"financial investigation" of Gas Producers.


Joe, couple of points - a) please check spelling and typos closely and b) in
the first paragraph of the second page starting "The Commercial
Origination...." should end with ".... knowledge necessary to reach our
goals."

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 12/06/2000
07:47 PM ---------------------------

Joe Kishkill@ENRON
12/06/2000 08:12 PM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Latest

Dave,

Our final.

Kish
---------------------- Forwarded by Joe Kishkill/SA/Enron on 12/06/2000 08:13
PM ---------------------------

Miguel Padron
12/06/2000 06:56 PM
To: Joe Kishkill/SA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Latest

Joe, Keith disappeared so I made the changes...here is the latest...MP


Please call todiscuss.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 01/05/2001 02:06
PM ---------------------------

"Lindo, Jacqueline E." <jacquelinelindo@akllp.com> on 12/22/2000 01:56:05 PM
To: <suzanne.adams@enron.com>
cc: <kay.mann@enron.com>

Subject: Enron South America

Attached please find a clean copy of the Enron South America Facility
Agreement as well as a blackline showing changes to section 6.1.2.

 <<ESA Break-out Agreement  Execution Copy.DOC>>  <<South America
Facility Agreement - Comparison of 9 to 10.DOC>>


Per Corporate, we have the following name change on an Enron entity,
effective today 9/18/00.  This information will be included on the final
notification report for September.

Old Counterparty Name           BA ID   CP ID   ERMS
Shortname                              New Counterparty Name    BA ID      CP
ID    ERMS Shortname
Midwest Energy Hub, L.L.C.               80670      80670
MIDWESTENEHUB                                         enovate,
L.L.C.                                  N/C              N/C        ENOVATELLC

The name overlay will be done today, the short name will change on 9/20.


---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 04/25/2001
07:58 AM ---------------------------

eserver@enron.com on 04/24/2001 11:28:52 AM
To: "Steven.J.Kean@enron.com" <Steven.J.Kean@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: <<Concur Expense Document>> - General Expenses

The following expense report is ready for approval:

Employee Name: John Hardy Jr Jr.
Status last changed by:  Automated Administrator
Expense Report Name: General Expenses
Report Total: $16,374.97
Amount Due Employee: $0.00

To approve this expense report, click on the following link for Concur
Expense.
http://xms.enron.com


You Wanna Piece of My Heart....
You better start from the start


---------------------- Forwarded by Mike A Roberts/HOU/ECT on 02/11/2000
03:29 PM ---------------------------

Charlene Jackson@ENRON
02/11/2000 03:13 PM
To: Celeste Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ginger B Gamble/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jana
Giovannini/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike A Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Charlie Weldon

Charlie Weldon is a candidate who was a summer associate last year.   I have
made the one and only exception for him on the starting date.  He works with
Mike Roberts and they had prearranged for him to work on a special project
during hurricane season.  Unfortunately, the project can't be delayed due to
the timing of hurricane season.  He will start in June to work on this
project.  It is not a project that a summer associate could work on so it is
not taking a job from one of them.

Mike totally understands the rationale for the starting date, etc. and has
promised in blood that Charlie will start the orientation with his class and
will not be pulled out to work on any projects during the 4 week
orientation.  He is also someone that they would take into their group after
orientation.

Mike is drafting a letter that he will sign in blood indicating his promise
re orientation.  Please keep an eye out for this individual when we send out
the material regarding starting dates, etc.

We need to also make sure Charlie understands that he must attend the entire
orientation.

Mike also promises to sing our praises about how great we are (smile-this is
my addition Mike did not say that, but I am sure he will do it)

Thanks


---------------------- Forwarded by Jeff Nogid/HOU/ECT on 08/18/2000 11:27 AM
---------------------------

"Lyons, Maureen (CICG - Equity Linked Capital Markets)"
<malyons@exchange.ml.com> on 08/09/2000 04:17:50 PM
To: "'jeff.nogid@enron.com'" <jeff.nogid@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: ENE- Forward Termsheet and Forward Confirmation Template

Hi Jeff,

Per our conversation this afternoon, I have attached the draft forward
purchase termsheet and forward transaction confirmation template for your
review.  Please give us a call to discuss terminating the Total Return Swap
as of Friday, 08/04/2000, and entering into a forward purchase contract at
your earliest convenience.

If you have any questions or need additional information, please let us
know.  We are looking forward to speaking with you soon!

 <<ENE-Forward-Draft termsheet.doc>>
<<Forward-Confirmation-Template-8-9.doc>>

Thank you,
Maureen Lyons
Merrill Lynch
Equity Linked Capital Markets
212-449-6763 (T)
212-738-1069 (F)

Maureen Lyons
Merrill Lynch
Equity Linked Capital Markets
212-449-6763 (T)
212-738-1069 (F)

 - ENE-Forward-Draft termsheet.doc
 - Forward-Confirmation-Template-8-9.doc


FYI - Below are meeting notes from last week's Central Data Repository
meeting.

Summary.
The challenge - there are many technical steps necessary to achieve a single
data source for all of Enron.  Below are our team's immediate technical "To
Do's".
The good news - teams are continuing to work together to bring about a ONE
Enron single source of data.

Marie
----- Forwarded by Marie Hejka/Corp/Enron on 01/08/2001 09:58 AM -----

	Geary Surratt
	01/05/2001 06:40 PM

		 To: Steve Woods/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Dorn/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Marie
Hejka/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Kathryn Schultea/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Michael Baust/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Antionette Forrest/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Regina Figueroa/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jo
Ann Hill/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Meeting Notes

This note summarizes the discussion and decisions made in today's meeting.
If your take on the meeting is different or if I have not accurately outlined
the decisions, please let me know and I will correct the synopsis below.

1. Facilities room and work phone for Houston Headquarters personnel will be
published in PeopleFinder and instructions will be provided on how to contact
facilities to correct data if needed.  The verbage for these instructions
will be developed with input from facilities.
2. The room and work phone in eHROnline will be display only for Houston
Headquarters personnel and will show the room and phone on Infotype 1028 in
SAP.  Instructions will be provided on how to contact facilities to correct
data if needed.  Whether or not to make these fields display only in
eHROnline can be determined by use of the SAP "z" table of Houston
Headquarters personnel areas currently used in the paycheck distribution
process.
3. SAP HR Houston will continue to process a nightly interface from
facilities to update room and work number on Infotype 1028.  This interface
can use either SS# or SAP ID.  The ISC will work with facilities to change
the interface to use Apeture data when FMS is retired.
4. "Global Data" people located in Houston Headquarters who are entered into
SAP in the new personnel area "Global Data" will have facilities data sent to
PeopleFinder.  These folks will be able to provide facilities with an SAP ID
instead of a SS# for entry into the facilities churn database.
5.  Contractors and "Global Data" people who are not in SAP HR Houston will
still be able to enter room and work phone in eHROnline.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
For your reference, below is the original list of TO DO's from the 12/6/00
meeting with regard to employee entered SAP data in eHROnline.  The above
decision affects item 5.

1. Proceed with the load of email and GIS# via the existing SAP I0105
interface per the specifications provided on 11/16.  Tony Forrest will
coordinate with the data mart team to work out processing details.
ACTION ITEM FOR: Tony Forrest (coordinating with Data Mart Team)

2. Obtain cost estimate to provide for cell phone, fax and pager entry on a
web page that will directly update SAP.  Exactly how the page should look and
how to utilize the existing ESS transactions still needs to be finalized.
Once implemented, perform a one-time conversion of eHROnline data into SAP.
ACTION ITEM FOR: Kathy Schultea (eHROnline cost estimate)

3. Create an interim interface to keep "Known as" in sync between SAP and in
the DataMart.   The issues which still need to be addressed here is how to
keep the interface from overwritting changes entered in either eHROnline or
in SAP.
ACTION ITEM FOR: Tony Forrest  (coordinating  with Data Mart Team)

4. Since there is no current ESS functionality for employees to update this
field, obtain a cost and time estimate for creating transactions direct entry
into SAP by employees from an eHROnline web page.
ACTION ITEM FOR: Geary Surratt (SAP cost estimate)/ Kathy Schultea (eHROnline
cost estimate)

5. Meet with Steve Woods to work out the process to publish FMS data, allow
employees to enter corrections which will be published until they move to a
new phone, location, and publish new rooms/phone numbers from FMS upon
processing a churn, whether or not the employee has entered a correction.
ACTION ITEM FOR: Geary Surratt/Kathy Schultea


Attached is the most recent version of the RMS 2002 planning calendar.  Thanks to all the working group chairs that  provided their standing working group meeting dates.  Working group chairs and ad hoc working chairs, should provide Larry Grimm and myself of any additions/changes to the calendar.  We are attempting for the first time, to have a planning calendar of the key system scheduled dates, standing meeting dates and other general RMS dates as the members wish.  The only dates that are not on the calendar are the ad hoc conference calls/meetings that do occur on a short notice basis.
Larry Grimm will coordinate with the appropriate ERCOT resource to place this in RMS' Key Document folder on the ERCOT website.

Don Bender
AEP, Customer Choice Operations
Net Phone 8-700-2655
Phone 918-594-2655
Net Fax 8-700-3969
Fax 918-594-3969
Cell Phone 918-260-5191
E-mail dgbender@aep.com

 - RMS Planning Calendar CY 2002_B.doc


I think his interest is a marketing/oringination/business development role.

Mariella Mahan@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
08/18/2000 02:18 PM
To: Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: David Haug/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Max
Yzaguirre/NA/Enron@ENRON@ECT, Shawn
Cumberland/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Re: Resume

Scott,
I know James McCord personally.  He used to work for Coastal, as part of the
fuels marketing group.  I have worked with him in the past.  Do you know what
he is interested in?  His background at Coastal was, as I mentioned, fuels.
Thanks! Mariella
ps: sorry for the horribly late reply/reaction.

Scott Neal@ECT
07/31/2000 03:53 PM
To: David Haug/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mariella
Mahan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Max Yzaguirre/NA/Enron@ENRON,
Shawn Cumberland/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: Resume

David, Mariella, Max, Shawn,

Please see the resume of James McCord attached below.
He has extensive international experience in Central and South America and
Mexico.
Any interest?

---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Neal/HOU/ECT on 07/31/2000 03:46 PM
---------------------------

Scott Neal
07/07/2000 04:54 PM
To: David Haug/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:
Subject: Resume

David,

I left a voice mail for you today regarding James McCord.  I have attached
his resume below for your reference.
He has extensive international experience in Central and South America and
Mexico.
Can I have James call you or someone in your group to visit about possible
opportunities?

Thank you.
Scott Neal

---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Neal/HOU/ECT on 07/07/2000 04:49 PM
---------------------------

"James R. McCord" <jrmccord@hotmail.com> on 07/07/2000 04:36:37 PM
To: Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Resume

 - 2000Resume.doc


Allan,

I am sending you my coordinates. I expect to be in London around
September the 20th.

Vince Kaminski

Vincent Kaminski
Managing Director - Research
Enron Corp.
1400 Smith Street
Room EB1962
Houston, TX 77002-7361

Phone: (713) 853 3848
Fax  :  (713) 646 2503
E-mail: vkamins@enron.com


Ernest - I was just wondering if I'll start getting e-mails reporting the
NP-15 and SP-15 indices. Are these reports generated? If so, who should I
contact to get them? Thanks for all your help in this matter.

Kate

djenergy <djenergy@dowjones.com> on 01/25/2001 01:26:06 PM
To:
cc: "Onukogu, Ernest" <Ernest.Onukogu@dowjones.com>

Subject: MeadMarketplace

 - MeadMktplace (2).xls


I have changed the following deals to reflect a monthly expiry frequency
instead of daily:

483753
483759
483765
483766

Since I don't enter options very often, and have only done daily options
before, I'm still getting familiar with all the different parameters of the
deals. I'm sorry for the confusion. Thanks for catching that.

Kate


I might be interested.


The Errata to the May 5, 2001 Staff Assessment for the Hanford Energy Park
Peaker is now online.  To view this document, please visit:

http://www.energy.ca.gov/sitingcases/peakers/hanford/documents/index.html

Thank you,

Jon Doidge
CEC Web Team


Jeff -

Here are the locations for the A and B Pops.

A Pops
San Jose
Santa Ana
San Diego (2)
San Francisco
Los Angeles
Sherman Oaks
Plus co-located in the four B Pops below

B Pops
Hayward
Sacramento
Rialto
Dominiguez Hills

 <<...>>
Michelle J. Windmiller
Telecommunications
(916)351-2160  (office)
(916)802-5423  (cell)
(916)351-2373  (fax)


Is this okay?
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 02/08/2001 11:31 AM
---------------------------

Dale Rasmussen
02/07/2001 11:24 AM
To: Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: OOPs - sent wrong version on Letter to Sierra re trans and
interX for Project Priscilla

Mary:  My comments to the letter.

Some of the changes are important from an accounting viewpoint (we need to
emphasize that this is being done on behalf of Southwest Power and its
subsidiaries.

Please let me know of any thoughts or questions.

Thanks.

Mary Hain
02/06/2001 02:58 PM
To: Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Dale
Rasmussen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Don Hammond/PDX/ECT@ECT, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Ed Clark/PDX/ECT@ECT, Stan Gray/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jim
Gilbert/PDX/ECT@ECT
Subject: OOPs - sent wrong version on Letter to Sierra re trans and interX
for Project Priscilla

Here's the right version.  I've deleted the earlier version.  Sorry about any
confusion.

Paul Kaufman
02/06/2001 12:38 PM
To: Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Dale
Rasmussen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Don Hammond/PDX/ECT@ECT, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Ed Clark/PDX/ECT@ECT, Stan Gray/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jim
Gilbert/PDX/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: IMPORTANT - Letter to Sierra re trans and interX for Project
Priscilla

Thanks for sending the letter along.  I forwarded it to Mitch Taylor for his
information and review.  I'm comfortable sending the letter (assuming Mitch
agrees).  I want to call Steve Oldham first and warn him of the problem.

I am uncomfortable taking any further formal action at least until we have a
meeting with Sierra on the PGE transaction that was scheduled for this week
and may take place next week.    Do we have any idea on what further delay is
costing us (i.e., $__/month)?

Mary Hain
02/06/2001 10:03 AM
To: Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Dale Rasmussen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Don Hammond/PDX/ECT@ECT, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Ed Clark/PDX/ECT@ECT, Stan Gray/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jim
Gilbert/PDX/ECT@ECT
Subject: IMPORTANT - Letter to Sierra re trans and interX for Project
Priscilla

Attached find a letter to Sierra Pacific about our transmission and
interconnection requests.  Due to Nevada Power's dilatory tactics to date and
the pendancy of financing for the project, Ed, Don, Stan, Jim G., and I agree
that the letter takes the necessary tone and should ask Sierra to file with
FERC the agreements (unexecuted) if Sierra doesn't give EPMI an executable
contracts by 2/28/01.  If we are going to make this demand we need to send
this letter ASAP.


Yes, the invoice he received is on noms.  Does it matter if it is not on the correct point?  As long as the volumes are ok?
How many volumes was the invoice, and how many was he expecting?
Please let me know.  Thanks, Gloria

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Staab, Theresa
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 11:29 AM
To:	Barkowsky, Gloria G.
Subject:	RE: CIG 10/01

Gloria,
I was looking at Path Manager and it doesn't look to me like they even pathed this CAN point.  Let me know what you find out - Mark Bergeron at Woodward is expecting a call back from us (Paul Lucci) today.
Thanks.

Theresa.

(The invoice they received must be based on nominations - right?)

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Barkowsky, Gloria G.
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 9:49 AM
To:	Staab, Theresa
Subject:	CIG 10/01

Theresa - CIG just finaled their invoices today, and I am working on them.
I will take a look at this and get back with you.  Thanks, Gloria


Please prepare the following response, and copy Dalton McGrath of Blake, Cassels & Graydon, for Mark Taylor's signature:

"We are writing in reply to your letter of November 16, 2001.  There simply has been no change in the manner or methodology by which the Floating Price for the referenced Transaction has been, and continues to be determined.  Your correspondence and the previous correspondence from your client represents a thinly veiled attempt to renegotiate a transaction without any basis in fact, law or good faith for so doing.  We expect the referenced Transaction to be performed in accordance with its terms, and intend to enforce and pursue all of our remedies in the event of any non-performance by your client.

Please forward all of your future correspondence on this matter to the attention of Mr. Dalton McGrath, Blake, Cassels & Graydon, 3500, 855-2nd Street SW, Calgary, Alberta, T2P 4J8, Fax: 403.260.9654."

____________________________________
Peter C.M. Keohane
Vice President, Assistant General Counsel
and Secretary
Enron Canada Corp.
Phone:	(403) 974-6923
Fax:	(403) 974-6707
E-mail:	peter.keohane@enron.com


Start Date: 1/9/02; HourAhead hour: 11;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002010911.txt


Mark,

Attached is my project list for the November 7th Swap Group Meeting.

Cordially,
Susan S. Bailey
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, Suite 3803A
Houston, Texas 77002
Phone: (713) 853-4737
Fax: (713) 646-3490
Email: Susan.Bailey@enron.com


Here is another one...
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 04/11/2001 11:13 AM
---------------------------

Mspartalis@aol.com on 04/11/2001 10:51:33 AM
To: sally.beck@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Accounting Director positions: Robert (Bob) Mickits; Big 5 Energy
services

Sally,

This is the second of the two emails I am sending you. ?

Please review the resume of Robert (Bob) Mickits. ?He is currently a
consultant with a Big 5 firm, loaded with GAS Energy experience. ?His
qualifications are:
* ????CPA; BBA - Accounting
* ????E&Y
* ????16 years progressive Accounting/Finance experience and responsibilities
* ????Developed a business process risk model identifying process
characteristics, business risks and associated best practices for the energy
trading and marketing industry.
* ????Experienced and responsible for front, middle and back office
accounting, risk management for energy trading and marketing firms.
* ????Directed all accounting policies & procedures, commodity and
derivative
accounting, reviewed and provided analysis on 133 accounting issues.
* ????Provided clients with infrastructure review and audits for global
trading operations.
* ????Excellent communication skills.

Thanks,
Mike
E. Michael Spartalis, CPA, CPC
ML&R Personnel Solutions
281-782-3411 (Cell) ??
mspartalis@aol.com (temp)
 - Mickits_Robert_0401_rev.doc