I believe this was intended for the other Susan Scott (sscott3@enron.com)...I'm with nat gas trading.

Thanks

	  From:  Christi L Nicolay                           04/19/2001 09:31 AM

To:	Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:	Entities that do not need FERC power marketing authorization

---------------------- Forwarded by Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT on 04/19/2001 09:31 AM ---------------------------

	  From:  Christi L Nicolay                           04/18/2001 05:44 PM

To:	Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jeff Brown/NA/Enron@Enron, Ron McNamara/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Aleck Dadson/TOR/ECT@ECT, Daniel Allegretti/NA/Enron@Enron, Howard Fromer/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Donna Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tom Hoatson/NA/Enron@Enron, Steve Montovano/NA/Enron@Enron, Jean Ryall/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tom Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janine Migden/NA/Enron@Enron, Dave Mangskau/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Dan Staines/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Roan/ENRON@enronXgate, Joe Connor/NA/Enron@Enron, Kerry Stroup/NA/Enron@Enron, Steve Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Thane Twiggs/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Andy Rodriquez/Enron@EnronXGate, Lloyd Will/HOU/ECT@ECT, steve.wang@enron.com, ebaughm@enron.com, terri.clynes@enron.com, oscar.dalton@enron.com, doug.sewell@enron.com, kcompea@enron.com, mike.e.kelly@enron.com, gary.justice@enron.com, patrick.hanse@enron.com, Karla Compean/Enron@EnronXGate, Kerry Stroup/NA/Enron@Enron, Dave Mangskau/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Brown/NA/Enron@Enron, Russell Ballato/NA/Enron@Enron, Don Baughman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matt Lorenz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jason Choate/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Maria Valdes/Corp/Enron@Enron, John Kinser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peter Makkai/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff King/Corp/Enron@Enron, Robert Benson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Fletcher J Sturm/HOU/ECT@ECT, Berney C Aucoin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brad Morse/HOU/ECT@ECT, ozzie.pagan@enron.com, heather.kroll@enron.com, david.fairley@enron.com, george.mccormick@enron.com, wjennin@enron.com, joseph.wagner@enron.com, elizabeth.johnston@enron.com, bill.rust@enron.com, Reagan Rorschach/Enron@EnronXGate, Edith Cross/HOU/ECT@ECT, Berney C Aucoin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer Bagwell/Enron@EnronXGate, Billy Braddock/Enron@EnronXGate, mike.curry@enron.com, drew.tingleaf@enron.com, cahn@enron.com, Edith Cross/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg Trefz/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Berney C Aucoin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michelle Parks/Enron@EnronXGate, jader@enron.com, Michael Brown/Enron@EnronXGate, mark.bernstein@enron.com, john.llodra@enron.com, janelle.scheuer@enron.com, George Wood/Corp/Enron@Enron, David Guillaume/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, joe.gordon@enron.com, splauch@enron.com, jennifer.n.stewart@enron.com, tom.dutta@enron.com, Posey Martinez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim Meyn/NA/Enron@Enron, Berney C Aucoin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pearce W Hammond/Enron@EnronXGate, Garrett Tripp/TOR/ECT@ECT, Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Frank/NA/Enron@Enron, Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, David Portz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael Etringer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Lackey/PDX/ECT@ECT, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Ray Alvarez/NA/Enron@ENRON, Steve Van Hooser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barbara N Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject:	Entities that do not need FERC power marketing authorization

We have been getting questions about the ability of potential customers to sell power onto the grid to EPMI.  Below is a brief outline of the FERC licenses required.  Customers other than those listed below (including non-QF industrial on site generators) need a power marketer license from FERC.  In most cases, such customers do not need to file for EWG status (unless their primary business is as a utility, like Enron).

In addition, both EPMI and EES filed at FERC for authorization to perform certain power marketer license functions on behalf of industrial on-site generation customers.  We expect the authorization within a month.  I'll let you know when we receive it and what we can do for customers.

---------------------- Forwarded by Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT on 04/18/2001 05:22 PM ---------------------------

"Andrea Settanni" <asettanni@bracepatt.com> on 04/18/2001 05:17:11 PM
To:	<christi.l.nicolay@enron.com>
cc:	"Dan Watkiss" <dwatkiss@bracepatt.com>

Subject:	Entities that do not need power marketing authorization

Christi-

This email briefly responds to your question whether state agencies or municipalities and qualifying facilities ("QFs") must obtain power marketing authorization.  The answer is no.

With regard to state agencies or municipalities, section 201(f) of the Federal Power Act ("FPA") states that no provision of Part II of the FPA, which governs the regulation of electric utility companies engaged in interstate commerce, "shall apply to, or be deemed to include, the United States, a State or any political subdivision of a state, or any agency, authority, or instrumentality of any one or more of the foregoing, or any corporation which is wholly owned, directly or indirectly, by any one or more of the foregoing, or any officer, agent, employee of any of the foregoing acting as such in the course of his official duty, unless such provision makes specific reference thereto."

Section 205 of the FPA, which would would otherwise require an entity to have rates for wholesale sales of power on file with FERC, does not apply to state agencies and municipalities.

With regard to whether QFs need power marketing authorization, most QFs are exempt (some small power production facilities are not exempt) from most provisions of the FPA, including section 205, which requires public utilities making sales of electric energy for resale in interstate commerce to file rate schedules with FERC.  QFs are instead regulated under PURPA, which authorizes utilities to purchase power from QFs at the purchaser's avoided cost.  FERC decisional precedent indicates that a QF can lawfully sell at market-based rates without seeking market-based rate authorization from FERC, but that it may nevertheless be prudent for a QF to seek FERC acceptance of a market-based rate schedule that would provide protection in the event QF status is lost.

Let me know if you need anything else.

Andrea M. Settanni
Bracewell & Patterson, L.L.P.
2000 K Street, N.W.
Suite 500
Washington, D.C.  20006-1872
(202) 828-7631 (phone)
(202) 857-2128 (fax)
asettanni@bracepatt.com


Good Job!


Kay -- Do you know if David H. is going to give you comments?  If you haven't
heard for sure, one of us will call Marvin and find out/coordinate.  Just
don't want to call if this has already been discussed with them.

Is there anything else at this stage that we can do to help your efforts on
the Extension or the main agreement?

Thanks  -- David

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Mann, Kay
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 9:26 AM
To: Fairley, David
Cc: Rorschach, Reagan; Kroll, Heather; Sacks, Edward; May, Tom; Coulter, Kayne
Subject: RE: Extension letter

Sounds good if you would like to forward to counter parties.

I've sent a draft to their counsel all ready (D Hunt and Hemleben).

ckm

From: David Fairley/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/29/2001 09:10 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Reagan Rorschach/ENRON@enronXgate, Heather
Kroll/ENRON@enronXgate
cc: Edward Sacks/ENRON@enronXgate, Tom May/ENRON@enronXgate, Kayne
Coulter/ENRON@enronXgate

Subject: RE: Extension letter

Kay -- Looks fine.  Unless anyone else has changes, would it be possible to
send it out today?  Thanks -- David

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Mann, Kay
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 8:00 AM
To: Rorschach, Reagan; Fairley, David; Kroll, Heather
Cc: Sacks, Edward; May, Tom; Coulter, Kayne
Subject: Extension letter

1st thing 1st.  Here's a draft of the extension letter:

 << File: MDEA ILA extension May 29.doc >>

Kay


Return-path: <info@winebid.com>
Received: from mta1.rcsntx.swbell.net (mta1-pr.rcsntx.swbell.net) by
sims1.rcsntx.swbell.net (Sun Internet Mail Server
sims.3.5.2000.01.05.12.18.p9) with ESMTP id
<0G9D002IKNX73Z@sims1.rcsntx.swbell.net> for sshackl@sims-ms-daemon; Mon, 26
Feb 2001 12:41:32 -0600 (CST)
Received: from winebid.com ([216.34.146.71]) by mta1.rcsntx.swbell.net (Sun
Internet Mail Server sims.3.5.2000.01.05.12.18.p9) with ESMTP id
<0G9D00L54NSQLC@mta1.rcsntx.swbell.net> for sshackl@Sims1.rcsntx.swbell.net;
Mon, 26 Feb 2001 12:38:51 -0600 (CST)
Received: from 216.34.146.71 (winebid.com [216.34.146.71]) by winebid.com
(8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id NAA19419 for <sshackl@swbell.net>; Mon, 26 Feb
2001 13:42:22 -0500 (EST)
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 13:42:22 -0500 (EST)
From: "winebid.com" <info@winebid.com>
Subject: US Invoice-NEW PROCEDURES
To: sshackl@swbell.net
Message-id: <200102261842.NAA19419@winebid.com>
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000

PLEASE NOTE: We no longer require a shipping authorization to process your
order.

Below you will find an invoice for your winning lots, along with the premium,
sales tax (if applicable) and insurance.  Shipping and handling will be
calculated upon shipment.

Important information regarding your order:

1. METHOD OF PAYMENT.

Your card will be charged for the hammer price, the 12.5% premium, insurance
and any applicable sales taxes.  SHIPPING AND HANDLING CHARGES WILL BE
CALCULATED UPON SHIPMENT AND SENT WITH YOUR SHIPPING NOTIFICATION.  To pay by
certified check, money order or bank wire, you must reply to this e-mail
within 24 hours.  Please note: personal checks are no longer accepted.

Remit to:
Winebid.com
Accounts Receivable
P.O. Box 2550
Napa, CA 94558 USA

2. REVIEW THE SHIPPING ADDRESS.

If we do not receive a reply to this invoice within 3 days, all wine will be
shipped with the information on this invoice.  You must reply to this invoice
with any changes, as an update to your profile through our website will not
automatically be received for this particular order.

Please reply to this e-mail if you have any special shipping instructions or
a change of address.  Business address locations are recommended.

3. SHIPMENT WITHIN 2-3 WEEKS:

You should expect your order to arrive in 2-3 weeks. Depending on your
location, it might take longer.  You will receive an e-mail notification upon
shipment of your order.

Congratulations! We are pleased to inform you that you are a winning bidder
in our 2001/02/25 United States auction.

############## INVOICE 20135221 ### 2001/02/25 ###########

      Michael  McKeogh (110574)
      Daytime Tel:(504) 524-3996
      Fax Number:(504) 524-3019
      E-mail:sshackl@swbell.net

Billing:
Michael McKeogh
      601 Poydras, Suite 2421
      New Orleans, LA  70130

Shipping:
Michael McKeogh
      Sara Shackleton c/o Enron Corp.
      1400 Smtih Street, EB 3801A
      Houston, TX  77002

Special Instructions:

Visa

[633945] LOT#: 2108 VINTAGE#: 1998 Size: 750ml Littorai Hirsch Vineyard Pinot
Noir --->   1 @ $55
[633946] LOT#: 2109 VINTAGE#: 1998 Size: 750ml Littorai Savoy Vineyard Pinot
Noir --->   1 @ $55
[633943] LOT#: 2106 VINTAGE#: 1997 Size: 750ml Kistler Vineyard Pinot Noir
--->   1 @ $165
[634015] LOT#: 2178 VINTAGE#: 1995 Size: 750ml Williams Selyem Olivet Lane
Vineyard Pinot Noir --->   1 @ $85
[634016] LOT#: 2179 VINTAGE#: 1996 Size: 750ml Williams Selyem Olivet Lane
Vineyard Pinot Noir --->   1 @ $75
[631621] LOT#: 116f VINTAGE#: 1997 Size: 750ml Kistler Sonoma Coast Pinot
Noir --->   1 @ $100
[633941] LOT#: 2104 VINTAGE#: 1996 Size: 750ml Kistler Sonoma Coast Pinot
Noir --->   3 @ $115
[633942] LOT#: 2105 VINTAGE#: 1997 Size: 750ml Kistler Sonoma Coast Pinot
Noir --->   1 @ $80

-------------------------------------------------------------------

$960.00 Sub-total
$0.00 Tax
$129.60 Premium and 1% Insurance
$1,089.60 Total

For an estimated range of shipping/handling charges, please follow this
link:  http://www2.winebid.com/about_winebid/shipping_rates.shtml

By registering at Winebid.com, you have agreed to the conditions of sale for
participating in our auctions:
http://www2.winebid.com/about_winebid/terms_conditions_usa_5_8.shtml

For important shipping information, please follow this link:
http://www2.winebid.com/about_winebid/shipping_5_6.shtml

Thanks from all of us at winebid.com.


I will be leaving the office today shortly after 3 p.m. to catch my flight to
Chicago.  I will be meeting with Sidley & Austin tomorrow and will back in
the office Wednesday (12/6) morning.

I will check my voice mail while I am gone.  If you need to reach me on an
urgent matter, I will have my cell phone with me (713-594-2683). -- Bob Bruce

Robert E. Bruce
Senior Counsel
Enron North America Corp.
T (713) 345-7780
F (713) 646-3393
robert.bruce@enron.com


<<Exhibits to Gas Turbine Purchase Agreement - without notations.DOC>>

Attached is the latest version of the Exhibits to the GE Turbine
Agreement.
 - Exhibits to Gas Turbine Purchase Agreement - without notations.DOC


Clayton,

No,
I haven't.

Vince

Clayton Vernon@ENRON
04/04/2000 02:07 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: ?

Vince-

Have you by chance read Alfred Korzibski's "Science and Sanity"?

Clayton


Start Date: 4/11/01; HourAhead hour: 18;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041118.txt

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 18 / Preferred:   7.08 / Final:   7.07)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: SCE1
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/11/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


Attached is the ERMS Discounting Analysis as of May 25, 2001.

Please call Chris Abel at X33102 or Anita Luong at X-36753 if you have questions.

Thanks


Definitely need fourth.  See you at Memorial Park at 7:00pm.
Thanks,
Amy

At 07:34 PM 11/14/2001 -0600, you wrote:
>Hi Amy
>
>My husband can watch the kids on Thursday (great) so if you still need
>another player I can make it.  Email or call me to confirm.  Thanks.
>
>Elizabeth
>713 853 6349
>
>
>**********************************************************************
>This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
>**********************************************************************
>


Christie,

This is regarding the risk management project.

I shall set up a separate meeting with Jeff regarding Wharton Tiger Team.
I would appreciate if you could call in as well.

Vince

Christie Patrick
12/12/2000 10:14 AM
To: Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: James L Bouillion/HOU/ECT@ECT, George Carrick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vasant
Shanbhogue/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Follow-up Meeting on Wharton

Hi Shirley!

I'll be on vacation, but will be Happy to call in at that time, or any other
time that is convenient for Vince.  Should we also include Jeff Shankman?

Please let me know the time and telephone number to call, and I'll be there!

Thanks!

--Christie.


Hi,

Our staff e-mail is currently not functioning. But as soon as it is up
again, we will respond to any inquiries, concerns or other issues as soon
as we can. Sorry for the inconvenience
Seung Lee
Haas School of Business
Evening MBA Program


Responses:
1.  I'll let Kevin answer this one.  ANR and Michcon are Central Desk pipes.

2.  I would prefer to address all items on Exhibit 1.  If possible I would
like to see the original Exhibit 1 volumes and updated Exhibit 1 volumes
through March 2001.  However, I don't remember buying back any baseload gas
on TCO for April.  I thought we priced everything at FOM IF and every day, we
are buying back gas at GD - $.01.

3.  Are you doing a buy sell with Erron at the same price?  Does Duke bill
CES directly for this?

4.  See attached worksheets.

5.  I don't know all the information on the local production yet.  The
pricing I'm currently using is the Exhibit 1 FOM deliverd pricing (pricing
using ENA transport).  The attached April file has a Local Production tab.
Molly Johnson is updating this information.  After she completes April, she
will recreate Jan - Mar.

6.   Since the delivered pricing on TCO is the same, I'm not concerned about
the individual citygate volumes.  For pricing purposes, I only care about
total daily deliveries.   It would be a problem if you were trying to take
additional gas from a non-constrained citygate to a constrained citygate and
you don't have enough capacity.  This holds true for most other pipelines as
well, Tenn Z6, CNG North Citygate, CNG South Citygate, ...  This would be a
better question for Charlie to ask me when he is looking for something
specific as it comes up.  The only thing I will not allow you to do is take
gas from one pipeline to the other, Texas Gas Z4 to CGAS, and Colleen has
discussed this with Melissa.

dkinney@columbiaenergygroup.com on 04/18/2000 09:40:36 AM
To: " - *Chris.Germany@enron.com" <Chris.Germany@enron.com>
cc: " - *Dalphon, Charles" <cdalpho@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *Porter,
Jeffrey" <jporte1@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *Flewellyn, Melissa"
<mflewellyn@columbiaenergygroup.com>
Subject: Questions

Chris--Below is a list of questions that we need to address fairly quickly.
Please look it over and let's talk.  The items are not prioritized in any way.

1-Enron's invoices show that for deliveries to Muncie (Indiana Gas) off ANR
the
price index used is Michcon.citygate.GD.M.I.   The same is true for delivery
points into Michcon.   Is this correct, or are you actually using ANR ML-7
plus
the Exhibit 1 increment applicable to Michcon?   Exhibit 1 specifies ANR ML-7
as the price index for Michcon.

2-CES has completely exited the following market areas/zones as of April 1:
TCO 6-11, TCO 6-12.   However, because Exhibit 1 contains projected volumes
for
these two market areas in April 00, CES had to purchase from and resell to
Enron 90% of the April volumes contained in Exhibit 1.  Exhibit 1 contains
projected volumes for both market areas thru October 2000.   Are we required
to
do a purchase/sell-back in each of these future months, or can we dispense
with
this?  I refer you to Section 3.6 of the Gas Supply Assignment and Agency
Agreement (p. 11-12) as having some bearing on this issue.

3-The monthly volumes in Exhibit 1 off Iroquios into Central Hudson are
incorrect.  The 4,200 Dth is a monthly volume, not a Dth/day volume.  Since
the
supply for this point is already arranged as a back-to-back with Duke Energy
and since Duke appears to be billing us directly for this gas, I do not intend
to do a simultaneous "buy/sell"  with Enron of the volumes in excess of the
(erroneous) Exhibit 1 volume.  If you disagree, let's discuss.

4-According to Exhibit 1, CES gets monthly capacity releases for TCO 4-21
(O&R),  TCO 7-3 (West Ohio), TGP Zone 6 (Boston Gas?), would you please
provide
me with the Dth of capacity released to Enron as CES's agent on a monthly
basis
for April at each of these points?   (I also need these numbers for January,
February, and March.)

5-How is the local production behind NYSEG, NFGD-PA, and CPA priced?

6-How will Enron invoice CES for daily swings on TCO in situations where gas
was merely being re-directed from one delivery point (where we were long for
that day) to another delivery point (where we were short)?

There will undoubtedly be other questions.  I will direct them to you as they
arise.

Thanks.

Doug Kinney
Ph:  703-561-6339
Fax:  703-561-7317


Remember the old Joseph Stalin adage:"The people  who vote decide nothing.
The people who count the vote decide  everything."


One of your friends sent this email through our website.
Friend's name: Angela Barnett
Friend's IP address: 192.152.140.9
Date and Time: 11/25/00 8:23:20 AM EST
See the bottom of this message to report abuse.

Hi,

Angela Barnett would like you to see this Web page:

http://www.daily-blessings.com/differencep.htm

check this out!  :)

================================================
Angela Barnett also included this note:

================================================

Win a Billion Dollars!
Win a Billion Dollars!
Win a Billion Dollars!
Win a Billion Dollars!

go to:
http://mailbits.net/grab/taf.asp
Win a Billion Dollars !!!

____
***IMPORTANT NOTE***

This is a free service provided by MailBits.com.
Compared to regular email, this is a better way to
recommend a website to your friends. That's because
information about the sender of the message is included
to prevent and catch abuse of the system.

To report abuse of this service: abuse-taf@mailbits.com


Great Ideas.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Howard, Kevin A.
Sent:	Friday, November 16, 2001 3:11 PM
To:	Hayslett, Rod
Subject:	EEOS sale

fyi - Brian Stanley asked me to join him in a meeting to discuss a potential sale of EEOS to some financial investors.  Was not aware

Also, are you aware of any monetization of the PGE "pre-sale"? Davis Thames, Paul Puchot (corpdev lawyer) and I may have an interesting idea on how we can get a perfected security interest in the future sales proceeds from the PGE sale.  Paul is an outstanding bankruptcy attorney who may have found a way, through the recently revised UCC, to accomplish this.  I did not want to spend much time on this if someone else was already working on it.  Sounds interesting, and I haven't heard anyone else talk about it.

On an unrelated topic, at some point, you and I should sit down with Jeff to discuss financing roles/responsibilities of EGS.  I would like to see less corp financing of EGS assets (especially when we are unaware of them a la TOPRs), since we will have to live with these deals post mortem.    I agree

Kevin


Tana:

As soon as you get confirmation that your request has been completed, please
let Edmund know so he can update/replace the London documents in the
Financial Trading Agreements Database.

Edmund:

I'm not sure who in the London office currently takes care of Notes apps, but
try David De-Coi or Gary Gleeson.  They (or whomever has taken over the
administration function for Notes; I'm sure if its not them, they will know
who...) can have the old London copy of the Financial Trading Agreements
database removed from the ECTLON-LN2 server.  Let me know if you have any
questions.

Regards,
Mike

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Jones, Tana
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 12:42 PM
To: Neves, Michael
Subject: Financial Trading Agreements database

Mike,

I attempted to give Edmund Manager access by doing one of those security
requests today.  I don't know if you need to do anything or not here....
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 03/20/2001 12:46 PM -----

	Edmund Cooper 03/20/2001 11:41 AM 	   To: Michael Neves/Enron@EnronXGate  cc:
Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT  Subject: Financial Trading Agreements database

Dear Michael,

Following our conversation the other day I have spoken with Tana about
allowing me delete capabilities on the database.  Tana has kindly consented
to this so hopefully she has confirmed/will confirm this so that the
necessary technological changes can be made from your end.

Many thanks, Edmund


me too , arnold is out today so a little busy
i love you honey

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Quigley, Kay
Sent:	Friday, August 17, 2001 9:42 AM
To:	Quigley, Dutch
Subject:	you

Good morning to my sweet honey..
Hope your day goes well...I really hope
that I did not come across as insensitive in our
discussion to try to get the townhouse back in the
event we get a contract on our lot, I just want what is best
given the levels of stress we deal with day in and day out
So- I would like to talk further about it- because if it makes sense
to try and keep going on that new construction then maybe we should- I guess we would
have "down time" while it was being built... just hope the lead on our
lot comes through.
love you
k-kay


I'm not aware of this matter - maybe in error?!  - Tony

-----Original Message-----
From: Ross, Johnny
Sent: 2002-2-14 (?????l) 14:56
To: Rahn, Nick; Chen, Tony; Watson, Kimberly; Harris, Steven; Howard, Kevin A.; Cunningham, Les; Hayslett, Rod; Purrenhage, Lee; McCann, Tim; Menefee, Bob
Cc: Robertson, Audrey
Subject: E Tickets

This message is to inform you that your eTicket is available for pick-up on the 27th floor of the Enron building at desk 2738B.

If you have any questions or feel that you have received this message in error, please contact us.   Pickup time is between 8:30 am and +

5:00 pm.

If you feel you have received this message in error feel free to contact me.

Thank You.
Corporate Travel

Johnny Ross
713-345-3640


Ross,

The only thought I have with respect to this request would be that it should
not apply if FCEL has failed to comply with its warranty obligations, or has
declined to service the modules after the warranty period has expired.

Kay

"Levine, Ross" <rlevine@fce.com> on 11/08/2000 03:22:30 PM
To: "'Jacqueline Scheib'" <jscheib@rc.com>, "'Stephen.Plauche@enron.com'"
<Stephen.Plauche@enron.com>, Scott.Healy@enron.com, Heather.Kroll@enron.com,
Kay.Mann@enron.com
cc: "Leitman, Jerry" <jleitman@fce.com>, "Nock, Herb" <HNock@FCE.com>, "Leo,
Tony" <tleo@fce.com>, "Bentley, Chris" <cbentley@fce.com>, "Mahler, Joseph"
<jmahler@fce.com>

Subject: Additional Contract Item

Jackie, Stephen, Scott, Kay, Heather:

We have an additional item we did not discuss today. We want to add to the
agreement a provision to the effect that:

The Purchaser (include their successors and/or assigns, subcontractors,
vendors, operators, etc.) may not open or in any other manner attempt to
view the interior of the DFC modules without Seller's express written
consent. Failure to comply with this provision would: a) Void all warranties
with respect to the Unit and b) Be considered an automatic violation and
breach of the confidentiality provisions of the agreement and subject to all
remedies for such violation.

Tony: We will also add the same provision to the O&M manuals.

Jackie: Please draft appropriate language for the agreement and include it
in the latest draft of the agreement.

Thank you.

Ross M. Levine, Esq.
Director of Contracts and Contracts Counsel
FuelCell Energy, Inc.
3 Great Pasture Rd.
Danbury, CT 06813

(203) 825-6057
(203) 798-2945 (fax)
rlevine@fce.com (email)

This transmittal and its attached files (if any) may contain proprietary or
confidential information belonging to FuelCell Energy, Inc. If you are not
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this
transmittal in error. Any review, disclosure, use, dissemination,
distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you
suspect that you have received this communication in error, please notify us
immediately by telephone at 1-(203) 825-6000, or e-mail at jryan@fce.com and
immediately delete this message and all its attachments.


Please advise, at your earliest convenience, of tentative or confirmed plans
for vacation during the holiday season, Nov & Dec,  which may not appear on
the attached calendar.

taffy


I have attached for your review a revised marked draft of the Participation
Agreement, marked against the draft dated 12/20.

Thank you and happy holidays.

Catherine Tzdogan
Bracewell & Patterson, L.L.P.
711 Louisiana, Suite 3000
Houston, Texas 77002
Tel:  (713) 221-1211
Fax: (713) 221-2146
cozdogan@bracepatt.com

 - PARTICIP.WPD
 - PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT - BRAZOS.doc


Krishna,

Niclas introduces himself as an associate in the Research Group.
I think we should clarify his status.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 08/15/2000
05:53 PM ---------------------------

"Michael SCHILMOELLER" <Michael_Schilmoeller@pgn.com> on 08/15/2000 11:08:06
AM
To: NOTES:Niclas.Egmar@ENRON
cc: vkamins@enron.com, Grant_Masson@pgn.com, Stinson_Gibner@pgn.com
Subject: Re: Info help.

Hi Niclas,

I am in the middle of preparing some presentations right now, so it might be
more productive to speak by phone (503-464-8430).  Please leave your number,
if you get my voicemail.

To get you started, you might see if you can get access to the FERC GADS
database of plant forced and planned availability.  It seems others in
Research have asked about this, so you may already have this at your
disposal.  The EIA has a good electronic database of plant FOR and POR
available for free (http://www.nerc.com/~esd/).  I know Alexios in RE/EES has
this.  If you wanted to do it the hard way, you can also ask Jaison to access
the EPA's CEMS data he has summarized on a machine there in Research.  It
contains hourly plant operation for every unit over about 50MW, which you
could aggregate up.

The WSCC 10-year forecast of new plant construction and loads is a good place
to start for plant construction information, but suffers from some notorious
"self-reporting" error.  It is available in pdf form from the web site
http://www.wscc.com/.  Other sources that should be more near-term, but more
accurate are the CEC inventory of plants (http://www.energy.ca.gov/) and the
BPA Whitebook (http://www.transmission.bpa.gov).

As far as basic economic data is concerned, you can either rely on the
reported utility forecasts for loads, or you can go to fundamental data.  The
ultimate source of the census data collected by the US Dept of Commerce,
which you can buy on CDROM for cheap.  It would have this kind of information
by SIC code, by ZIP code.  You may also have access to one of the economic
forecasting businesses (Wharton's WEFA, DRI, etc.)  They have this in highly
digested and complete form.

BTW, Tim Heizenrader, who runs Fundamental Analysis and Research on the West
Desk, is a sharp cookie and should have all this under control.  Is your
client aware of this resource?

Give me a buzz and we can talk more,
Michael

>>> Niclas Egmar/HOU/EES@ENRON 08/14/00 12:49PM >>>
Michael,

I'm an analyst in the research group. I would like your help with finding
some information specific for the West Coast. A new analyst on the West Power
desk needs information on planned outages and planned new generation. He is
studying the long-term fundamentals of electricity volatility on the West
Coastso so he also needs info on housing starts, computer sales or industrial
production figures for computer manufacturing, growth of start-up companies,
and population stats.

Any help in finding the needed info would be greatly appreciated. Contact me
or Daniel Kang (new analyst).

Niclas
 - TEXT.htm


I'm around.  Could you forward me the "matrix."  (sounds so "classified."  I love it.)

Best,
Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Landwehr, Susan M.
Sent:	Friday, September 28, 2001 11:27 AM
To:	Dasovich, Jeff
Subject:	RE: Participation in Roundtable on Lessons Learned in California on October 4th

hi Jeffie.  are you in office?  I'd like to talk to you about Mr. Tycholiz and gas stuff.  I am going to send you a copy of an e mail on gas/west/Tycoliz

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Friday, September 28, 2001 11:20 AM
To:	Landwehr, Susan M.
Cc:	Kaufman, Paul; Steffes, James D.; Shapiro, Richard
Subject:	RE: Participation in Roundtable on Lessons Learned in California on October 4th

Did governor Jessie eliminate the role in Minnesota?  I believe that it's the equivalent of a state historian.  Thanks for the feedback.

Best,
Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Landwehr, Susan M.
Sent:	Thursday, September 27, 2001 9:21 PM
To:	Dasovich, Jeff
Cc:	Kaufman, Paul; Steffes, James D.; Shapiro, Richard
Subject:	RE: Participation in Roundtable on Lessons Learned in California on October 4th

Jeff--so what is a state librarian?  Must be a west coast kind of specialty!!

With regard to Glen Thomas, I believe that he is the newly appointed chair who was previously Governor Tom Ridge's policy guy in the governor's office. I think he is pretty young (early thirties) and that he still has strong ties in that office and should be vocal on markets working and political leadership (the right kind!) being neccesary.  Steffes might be able to give you more insight, but if my recollection is right, he wasn't involved in the early PECO fights--I think he came on the scene a little later.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Thursday, September 27, 2001 7:12 PM
To:	Kean, Steven J.; Shapiro, Richard; Steffes, James D.; Robertson, Linda; Landwehr, Susan M.; Denne, Karen; Mara, Susan; Kaufman, Paul; Nord, Sue; Palmer, Mark A. (PR); Guerrero, Janel
Subject:	Participation in Roundtable on Lessons Learned in California on October 4th

On October 4th, I'll be trying to fill Rob Bradley's rather large shoes at the Cal State University Center for California Studies' 13th annual envisioning California conference, "Our Year of Disconnect:  The Politics of Power in California."

I'll be participating in a Roundtable at the plenary session entitled: "Lessons Learned, Unlearned & To Be Learned:  A Roundtable on California's Utility Deregulation."

The Roundtable will be moderated by the State Librarian, Kevin Starr.  The other roundtable-ists include:

Chuck Cicchetti (Edison plant?  Anyone know what he's up to these days?)
Bob Foster--Edison
Nettie Hoge--head of TURN
Glen Thomas--Chair of the Pennsylvania PUC (any info on Chair Thomas is appreciated)
State Senator Debra Bowen
David Freeman--Self-appointed emporer
Dr. Joseph Pratt--History prof., University of Houston (any info on the professor is also appreciated)

Each of us will have two minutes to open and then Dr. Starr will moderate the ensuing mud-slinging.

Attached are some draft talking points that I threw together for your review.  All comments, suggestions, guffaws, etc. are welcome and appreciated.

Best,
Jeff

 << File: CSU Rountable draft talking points 0927.doc >>


John:
As we discussed, here is a draft of a proposed amendment letter which covers
the issues that we talked about.  Depending upon how Leslie handles the
affiliate issue, more may be added to this.  Alos, as I ,mentioned to you,
this needs to be approved by the head of our Online group before I can sign
off on it.  I am in the process o getting that approval.
Carol


Here's another document I need to have faxed to me:

Thanks,

Kay


Don't worry - I already spoke to Souad.  SS

	Carol St Clair
	06/16/2000 05:19 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: IPE Brent language

Sara:
This is Greek to me.  Can you help?
carol

----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 06/16/2000 05:18 PM -----

	Souad Mahmassani
	06/16/2000 04:17 PM

		 To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Susan Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: IPE Brent language

Carol,
Please advise on the below matter.  I currently have 5 Dated IPE Brent deals
where a confirm has not gone out yet.
Thanks,

Susan Flynn@ECT
06/14/2000 05:17 PM
To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Souad Mahmassani/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: IPE Brent language

Carol  -  can you respond to this for Souad?   Thank you!

Susan D. Flynn
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB3806
Houston, Texas  77002
Phone:  713-853-0975
Fax:  713-646-3490
----- Forwarded by Susan Flynn/HOU/ECT on 06/14/2000 05:06 PM -----

	Souad Mahmassani
	06/14/2000 04:02 PM

		 To: Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Susan Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: IPE Brent language

Susan
We need your help on this language. Please see the below blue paragraphs,
particularly "Common Pricing" clause.
London wants us to add this in our Dated vs IPE brent spreads. This allows
the settlement of the deal to be based on only good business days for both
indices.
We got the permission from our (ENA) trader to use the languange in the below
ENA-ECTInternational deals, but we are not sure about all other Dated vs IPE
brent deals.  Our trader has agreed to this because he has no position, but
ECTInternational is going to want this clause in all similar spread deals.
Please advise

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Larry Joe Hunter @ ECT                           06/09/2000 09:30 AM

To: Sheetal Patel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Souad Mahmassani/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: language?

Souad/Sheetal,

Do not revise these deals.  Show this language to our Crude guys.  We have
had a problem recently with the below.  The "Common Pricing" clause below
would mean that when IPE is closed then the price Platt's publishes that day
would be void.  Our guys do not like that ideology.  Therefore, check with
them before doing this.  Also, we should get approval from legal before using
the below.

Joe

Sheetal Patel
06/09/2000 09:18 AM
To: Souad Mahmassani/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: language?

Hi Souad,

The following deal numbers need to be revised.  They need to have the blue
language below in the confirms.  Let me know if you have any questions.

NJ1204
NJ1271
NJ1285
NJ1296

Thanks,
Sheetal :)
---------------------- Forwarded by Sheetal Patel/HOU/ECT on 06/09/2000 09:15
AM ---------------------------
From: Christopher Shapland on 06/09/2000 08:54 AM GDT
To: Sheetal Patel/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: language?

Sheetal

I'm sorry - here you are!

Floating Price:

The mean of the arithmetic average of the daily high and low quotations for
Crude Oil Assessments published in the table entitled &Crude Price
Assessments: International US$/BBL: Brent (DTD)8 in the issue of Platt,s
Crude Oil Marketwire ("Platts") that reports prices effective for such
Business  Days during the Calculation Period minus the average of the daily
settlement prices for the prompt month of the IPE Brent Futures Contract for
each Commodity Business Day for the applicable Calculation Period, with the
exception of the last Commodity Business Day of the prompt month on which day
the settlement price for the Second Nearby Month will be used.

Common Pricing:

Pricing to be effective only on the days when both the IPE is open and Platts
publish their dated Brent assessment.

Cheers

Chris
:)

Sheetal Patel
08/06/2000 22:51
To: Christopher Shapland/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: language?

Hi Chris,

I have not received any language from you.  Just wanted to make sure you
didnt forget.

Thanks,
Sheetal :)


steve,

Do you see an intraday bottom?

Vince

Steve Bigalow@ENRON
03/12/2001 08:13 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: 3/12

Good morning,

Watch for a severe selloff today. But it should turn around and the buyers
will bring it back up. I am anticipating that this will be the reversal day
for the NAS>

Steve


----- Forwarded by Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron on 01/12/2001 02:08 PM -----

	Karen Denne
	01/12/2001 09:45 AM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Linda
Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Peggy Mahoney/HOU/EES@EES, Maureen
McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: California Power Failure

Please see attached editorial, which ran in yesterday's New York Times and is
in today's Houston Chronicle.  We are distributing to all key media who have
been covering California energy.

SF team -- Please distribute to all legislators, trade and industry
organizations,  etc.
Linda -- Please forward to Quinn Gillespie to distribute in Washington.
Maureen -- Please distribute to the internal GA team.

Thanks.
kd

Editorial Desk; Section A
Essay
California Power Failure
By WILLIAM SAFIRE

01/11/2001
The New York Times
Page 31, Column 1
c. 2001 New York Times Company

LOS ANGELES -- In the past decade, California has become the most Democratic
state in the nation. It has a Democratic governor, two liberal Democratic
senators, and both houses of its legislature are firmly in Democratic hands.
Not for nothing is it called the Left Coast.
Then why, Californians now ask themselves, is their state the most troubled
in the nation? Bad enough that Hollywood's writers are preparing to strike;
worse that speculators in Silicon Valley start-ups are watching their stack
of chips dwindle; worst of all is the unforeseen electricity shock that is
making the state's hair stand on end.
The price of electricity is soaring, yet the big electric utilities are
threatened by bankruptcy. Who's to blame?
The chosen villain: deregulation. As soon as cruel market forces were allowed
to work, cry liberal voices, those heartless capitalists drove up prices.
Bring back the cool, calm days of inefficient monopolies under government
control.
But in fact, the first villain is botched deregulation -- not as bad as in
Russia, but 'tis enough, 'twill do.
California's politicians deregulated halfway, which is the worst way:
wholesale prices were freed from controls, but retail prices were not.
Consumers remained seemingly protected, but the utility companies -- which
foolishly thought wholesale prices would go down forever -- were enabled to
buy on the spot market. Legislators believing they were protecting consumers
forbade long-term contracts, which are hedges against sudden price
fluctuations.
This halfway dereg ran smack into the inexorable law of supply and demand.
The good times of the 90's sharply increased demand for electric power. But
all sorts of obstacles were put in the way of increasing the supply of that
power.
Result: upward pressure on prices, calls for rationing, utilities going
broke, government intervention that frightens off private investment, and the
danger of an economic Big One in the state responsible for 13 percent of the
nation's product.
The unspoken issue in this bastion of liberalism is ''nimby'' -- the real
villain in the current supply crisis, that says ''not in my backyard'' to
power plants. In San Jose, epicenter of the computer industry's drain on
electric power, New Economy voters recently rejected a new power facility
that offended their aesthetic sensibilities. Red tape and purple rhetoric are
the reasons no major power station has been built in California in 10 years.
Contrary to popular belief, electricity does not come from the socket in the
wall. The steady flow of low-cost power comes from factories that convert
energy from other sources into the stuff that makes toasters pop,
air-conditioners wheeze and computers beep. Unless energy is dug up and
produced in real places and transmitted through real lines, nothing comes out
of the wall.
Environmentalists recoil in horror at suggestions of nuclear power, now a
safe and clean source of electricity, or the use of cleaned-up coal to lower
the price of natural gas that generates it. Reducing pollution sensibly is
laudable, but clean-air extremists become local heroes without telling
constituents the danger of loss of Intel jobs and cheap electricity's
household convenience.
The answer is not re-regulation, nor more halfwayism, nor federal bailout.
When Gov. Gray Davis of California raced to Washington, D.C., to ask for
wholesale price controls, he found Bill Clinton too busy carving up Jerusalem
to mediate; Clinton-appointed federal energy bureaucrats offer only
palliatives, with photo op to follow.
Davis's panicked proposal to build state-owned plants (in Nevada? On the
moon?) and his threat to seize the assets of ''price gougers'' may please
some new breed of dot-communists. But such populist pap destroys private
incentive to invest and is hardly the path for a presidential hopeful
professing to be a centrist.
After short-term action to alleviate hardship caused by past and present
political-industrial blindness, our biggest state should avoid regressing
into more stultifying regulation and instead get out of the way of
stimulating supply.
Why do I sound like a reformed drunk on this? Because I wrote the Nixon
speech imposing wage and price controls. They never work in peacetime. Never.

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Thanks for the info.  I don't need anything further.  Also, thanks for your
assistance last week and continued attention to our legal group.  Sara

Mark Davidson@ENRON
10/25/99 03:54 PM
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Financial Trading in Brazil

This was part of a normal maintenance program that moves groups of messages
with large attachments from one point to another. David is a Notes
administrator.  The return receipt was  a side effect of the message moving.
I can give you more details if you need them. Please let me know.

Thanks

Mark Davidson

---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Davidson/Corp/Enron on 11/28/99
03:48 PM ---------------------------

Mark Davidson
10/25/99 08:00 AM
To: David Ricafrente/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:
Subject: Re: Financial Trading in Brazil

David-

Sara Shackleton sent mail out to four EI people.  She got a return receipt
from you.  You were not on the address list.  Can you please explain how she
received a return receipt from you?

Thanks

Mark Davidson

---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Davidson/Corp/Enron on 11/28/99
07:58 AM ---------------------------

Sara Shackleton@ECT
10/22/99 03:21 PM
To: Mark Davidson/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Re: Financial Trading in Brazil

---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 10/22/99 03:20
PM ---------------------------

Return Receipt
Your document:	Re: Financial Trading in Brazil
was received by:	David Ricafrente/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
at:	10/19/99 02:05:29 PM


keep buying N-M socal gd index up to plus .04.  I will buy as much as they
want to sell.  talk to amerex.

Mike


Wow.  I hope you said "no."

>>> <Joe.Stepenovitch@enron.com> 11/28/00 02:39PM >>>

Much better!!!  How are you doing?

Listen to this....She left me a message yesterday and had the nerve to ask
me to help with her bills!!!!  She has got to be kidding!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Anyway, I'll let you know what happens tomorrow after I talk to Mr. Rustay.
Have a great day and thanks for the e-mail....

-Step

"Derek Leon" <dleon@bracepatt.com> on 11/28/2000 11:05:33 AM

To:   <Joe.Stepenovitch@enron.com>
cc:

Subject:  Re: george rustay

How are you doing this morning?

>>> <Joe.Stepenovitch@enron.com> 11/27/00 06:53AM >>>

Good Morning Derek,

I just wanted to thank you for being such a good friend.  I really need
someone to talk to  and you were there for me!  I 'll never forget
that........  Anyway, I will call Mr. Rustay first thing this morning.
Thank you again for the number.

She did call me last night and I took the "HIGH" road like you said and
everything you said was going to happen did.  She is not coming back here!!
I'll let you know what Mr. Rustay says about my situation.  Thanks again
for everything.  You truly are a great friend.

-Joe Step

"Derek Leon" <dleon@bracepatt.com> on 11/26/2000 09:29:55 PM

To:   <joe.stepenovitch@enron.com>
cc:

Subject:  Re: george rustay

Joe,

This is the name and number of the attorney we talked about and the name of
the person referring you (Jenn, who works with me, is George's future
daughter-in-law).  Hope this helps - keep me posted buddy.

D-

>>> Jennifer Garnett 11/26/00 09:01PM >>>
713.940.6003


CONGRATULATIONS!!!
PAT JOHNSON is the winner for +The Name This Newsletter Contest,.  It was a
close call. After receiving over 50 great ideas, the PR Dept had a tough time
narrowing the list to the top ten for Mark Frevert,s final decision.  We,d
like to thank everyone who submitted suggestions and a special thanks to Pat
Johnson for sending in the winning name EnTouch.

BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTS

EGM Coal & Emissions
The November and December NYMEX market remains very tight.  Offers in the OTC
market have climbed to the low $40s.  The highest reported trade for December
was reported at $38.50.   The tightness should continue through the first
half of the year  with the Martin County mine still shut down.  The rest of
the year remains strong piggy backing off of the current spot market.

Finally--Life beyond the 150 to 155 range--vintage year 2000 SO2 allowances
broke out of this trading range this week.  The low trade was around $119.50
and the last trade was around $120.50.  The sharp drop in prices was caused
in large part by the news of Dominion Virginia Power settling the New Source
Review lawsuit brought against it by the state of NY and the EPA Continuing
rumors of further NSR related settlements will likely create continued
volatility.  It is as yet unclear what the new price floor will be.

NOx has settled down a bit with last trade 2001 vintage of $675.

Principal Investments
Solo Energy Corporation, an Alameda, California based developer of Wireless
Energy microturbine products to supply superior on-site energy service to
U.S. commercial and light industrial customers, announced that Enron North
America has completed an equity investment in Solo Energy as well as entered
into an alliance agreement.

In exchange for warrants to purchase the Company,s preferred stock, Enron
will assist in obtaining fuel contracts to support the Company,s distributed
generation contracts, including the provision of gas and backup electricity,
and will work with the Company to support its market and gas technology
research.

NEWS FROM THE GLOBALFLASH

EnronCredit.com
On Halloween, Enron Credit.com hit the City of London last Tuesday. As an
original PR stunt, the EnronCredit.com team organized a Grim Reaper with two
female vampires to distribute candy carrying the message, "Corporate
bankruptcies are on the increase and could be your worst nightmare. You can
protect your company and sleep well at night". Locations for the distribution
of 5,000 packs of candy were Bank, Broadgate and Canary Wharf. The general
feedback and reaction of people was positive. Photos of the event will be
available on the EnronCredit.com site.

Enron Japan Corp.
Enron is powering ahead in Japan following the official launch of Enron Japan
Corp. in Tokyo last week.  In keeping with Japanese tradition, Ken Lay, Joe
Hirl, Ken Rice and Mike McConnell donned "happi coats" - a sort of short
kimono - and used ceremonial hammers to break the lid of a wooden cask of
sake in front of an audience of 350 drawn from major companies and
government.  Enron has made an immediate impact already by offering eligible
consumers 3-5 year contracts with immediate savings of up to 10 percent in
the first year.   View the Japan website at www.enron.co.jp  [No worries,
it's in Japanese and English ...Ed]

There are 35 Enron employees in the Tokyo office including an Enron Metals
team.  EBS will be staffing up there over the coming months.

Nordic energy agreement with UPM-Kymmene
Enron Nordic Energy and UPM-Kymmene Corp. have signed a two-year portfolio
management agreement covering UPM Kymmene's Nordic power portfolio. The
Mid-Market desk in the Oslo office will assist UPM in optimising its
portfolio of approximately 14 TWh. energydesk.com will provide UPM with the
risk management system used in the process. In addition, the agreement opens
the door for Enron Energy Services to explore a variety of opportunities
within the company. The Nordic agreement is the first step towards a broader
scope of co-operation with UPM on a European and Global basis. The total
contract value is estimated to be $375 million.

UPM-Kymmene's nominal electricity resources total about 3000 MW, of which
2500 MW in Finland and about 500 MW in other countries. The group's power
procurement totals approximately 18 TWh per year, of which about 14 TWh in
Finland. Around 15 TWh/a is consumed by the group's own mills and the rest is
sold to the market.

http://www.upm-kymmene.com
http://www.upm-kymmene.com/upm/energy/energybuild.html

The deal was led by Sami Tenngren - Nordic Mid-Market, and was supported by
Magnus Groth - EES, Jukka Hormaluoma - energydesk.com, and Martin Rosell -
Legal.

Congratulations on a job well done to all those who worked so hard to put
this transaction into place........Thor Lien.

Australia
Despite heavy flooding in NSW, the weather is looking up for Enron
Australia.  Last week, the Sydney Office launched online Hong Kong weather
derivatives  and the Sydney weather node traded on EnronOnline in the US time
zone.  With this precedent, we hope to support the takeoff of global weather
on EnronOnline.

The Coal Group in Sydney has suddenly become very popular. There is no doubt
that a recent sale to AES for the plant at Barbers Point, Hawaii is the real
reason.  Coal purchases during year 2000 have been concluded with most major
producers in Indonesia and Australia.  We will soon be loading our first
shipment from China. Deliveries to Nippon Steel in Japan are underway. Also,
a shipment to a large power utility in Japan will take place in early 2001.

Off-shore wind plans
Enron has entered into agreement to purchase the development assets of a 30
MW offshore wind project in the UK.  The Harwich project, situated in
Gunfleet Sands approximately eight kilometres offshore in the North Thames
Estuary is believed to represent one of the first serious investments in the
development of offshore wind energy in the UK.

ENRONONLINE STATISTICS

Below are the latest figures for EnronOnline as of November 27, 2000.

* Total Life to Date Transactions> 464,000
* Life to Date Notional Value of Transactions > $263 billion

NUGGETS & NOTES

"How does your earnings target look for the quarter?" ) Brent Price,
VP/Operations & Chief Accounting Officer for EGM

"Always price the illiquidity risk premium appropriately!" ) Doug Friedman,
Director of Financial Petrochemicals and Plastics

What people say to Julie Gomez,VP/Upstream Services-ENA - "I heard your laugh
clear across the floor!!!"

IN THE NEWS

"The uncertainty [of the presidential election] does not influence business.
It is a relatively short-term distraction. Our business model has not changed
and will not change as a result of the election because we've worked very
well with both the Clinton/Gore administration in Washington and the Bush
administration in Texas."
-- Mark Palmer, vice president of Enron Corporate Communications, Associated
Press

"The name of Enron may be unfamiliar in Japan, but it should not stay that
way for long.........Joseph Hirl, president of Enron Japan, says: "We don't
go in and try to destroy markets - we go in and create them."  Some of the
company's potential customers and business partners may still need to be
persuaded of that, but Enron has a large stock of experience to reassure
them".---Financial Times

WELCOME
New Hires ENA/EIM/EGM
ENA ) Lydia Atwood-Minter, Kenneth Thibodeaux, Lacye Trevino-Brymer
EGM )Humaira Badat, Daiquiri Lucas

Transfers to ENA/EIM/EGM
ENA ) Trinh Abrell, Terri Austin, Guillermo Balmaceda, Eric Booth, Robert
Chmielewski, Joyce Dorsey, Sharon Gonzales, Laura Gutierrez, Scott Healy,
Dawn Kenne, Robert Kraszewski, Sandra Morris, David Porter, Daniel Quezada,
Henry Quigley, Steven Rose, Felecia Russell, Mary Symes, Dan Williams,
Rosalinda Zermeno
EGM ) Braedi Craig, Scott Baukney, Samantha Davidson, David Loosley, John
Massey, Diana Monaghan, Adam Siegel, Ioannis Tzamouranis

LEGAL STUFF

The information contained in this newsletter is confidential and proprietary
to Enron Corp. and its subsidiaries.  It is intended for internal use only
and should not be disclosed


I don't think I'm going to be making this trip......I close on a house the
29th of Nov ......and the enron christmas party is sat Dec 9th.....

 thanks for the heads up, sorry I can't make it.......have a happy holiday..

  p.s. just a suggestion,........you guy's should get together with
Napoleon.....oops, I meant Foose


Ava, have you been keeping track of  the people responding to the invitation?
	Thanks. Lynn

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cappiello, Deborah
Sent:	Thursday, October 11, 2001 3:51 PM
To:	Blair, Lynn
Subject:	Brown Bag

Jo Williams and Kent Miller will be in Houston for the Brown Bag Mtg


Did you set up a contract review session with Patton or any Dynegy folks for this am?  She called and wants to come over this am.
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


M O N D A Y   M O R N I N G   E X T R E M E   M A R K E T S
A complimentary service from INO.com ( http://www.ino.com/ )

CDCD   FREE: NetFutures' exclusive eStarter Kit CD-ROM
CDCD   http://www.ino.com/specials/netfutures/

Andrew,

KEY EVENTS TO WATCH FOR:

10:00 AM ET. Weekly grain export inspection reports.

10:00 AM ET. May Challenger monthly layoff report.

10:00 AM ET. May NAPM non-manufacturing index.

1:30 PM ET. Treasury releases results of $23 billion auction of 13-
and 26- week bills (Previous accepted rates: 13-week 3.605%, 26-week
3.550%)

3:00 PM ET. USDA planting progress reports.

3:00 PM ET. USDA crop conditions reports.

KEY HEADLINES:

Oil prices spikes as Iraq stops exporting in protest at UN sanctions.

Bristol-Myers, Novartis are leading bidders for DuPont unit, says
report.

IMC: Greenspan sees little evidence of emergence of US inflation.

Barclays reports good first quarter growth from consumer leading and
savings.

Vivendi may sell BskyB stake to institutions, says report.

Duisenberg, Greenspan advocates price stability for growth.

Bank of Japan says further deflation "can't be ruled out."

Microsoft, AOL talks on Windows XP deal faltering, says report.

The STOCK INDEXES & MARKETS

The NASDAQ and S&P 500 were higher overnight due to follow-through
buying after closing higher last Friday. As long as both indexes hold
above their May lows, it appears as though minor low might be
forming. Strengthening technology stocks despite a
weaker-than-expected NAPM report on Friday continues to support
short-term gains. The Dow posted a key reversal up last Friday due to
light short covering. Additional gains on Monday are needed to
confirm this bullish reversal pattern. However, momentum indicators
are bearish warning traders and investors alike to use caution, as
the Dow remains vulnerable to additional weakness near-term. If the
decline off May's high continues, May's reaction low crossing at
10,774.10 is the Dow's next target.

European markets were mostly higher in overnight trading in response
to strength in U.S. equity markets, which were higher overnight. The
UK FTSE- 100 was up 34.20 points at 5843.80 while the German DAX-30
was 41.05 points at 6166.22 as of 11:01 BST.

The Nikkei was higher overnight after fluctuating in less than a
100-point range all day. High technology and banking stocks remain
weak due to earnings concerns while selected defensive stocks such as
real estate, oil and coal issues were pushed higher. The Nikkei
continues to consolidate below the 38% retracement level of this
spring's rally that crosses at 13,363. If the decline off May's high
continues, the 50% retracement level crossing at 12,995 is a
potential target later this year. Momentum indicators remain bearish
signaling that additional weakness near-term is possible. The Nikkei
closed up 50 points to 13,312.

INTEREST RATES

September bonds were slightly higher overnight as it extended last
week's rally. Last Friday's rally led to a breakout above this
spring's downtrend line, which confirmed that a short-term bottom has
been posted. I would not be surprised to see a setback on Monday as
September might try and test broken trendline line resistance
crossing near 100-00 before moving higher during June. Momentum
indicators have turned bullish signaling that sideways to higher
prices into early-June are possible.

The German bond market or Bunds started the new week lower. Germany's
contribution to the market is expected to be limited, as many traders
are taking the day off for a public holiday. The June Bunds were last
up 0.07 at 106.63.

Japanese government bond markets were nearly steady overnight as the
market was locked in range bound trading. The lead June 10-year JGB
futures closed at 140.53 yen, up 0.01 while the yield on the
benchmark No. 231 June 10-year cash bond stood at 1.240%, down 0.005
as of 1520 JT.

The ENERGY MARKETS were higher in overnight trading in response to
news that Iraq has halted oil exports in protest U.S. and U.K.
efforts to impose a "smart" sanctions policy. Iraq's oil minister
indicated that oil exports would only resume if the UN renewed the
oil-for-food deal for the regular six-month interval.

July crude oil gapped up on the oil embargo news from Iraq and
extended gains overnight as it consolidates above the 38% retracement
level of this year's rally crossing at 28.26. Closes below last
week's low at 27.55 would open the door for a larger-degree decline
ahead of this week's OPEC meeting. Momentum indicators are bearish
but nearing their respective oversold zones warning traders to use
caution as a short-term bottom might be near.

July heating oil was higher overnight but off session highs following
a gap higher opening. Like crude oil, heating oil rallied on news of
Iraq's halt of oil exports. However, July remains below this spring's
uptrend line crossing near 77.60, which strongly suggests that a top
and trend change has taken place. Unless July heating oil can close
above broken trendline support, May's reaction low crossing at 74.55
is July's next downside target.

July unleaded gas was higher overnight but near session lows as the
short covering bounce began to fade in late-session trading.
Nevertheless, a higher close during the day session would strongly
suggest that last Thursday's spike below May's reaction low crossing
at 91.20 marked a double bottom. Momentum indicators remain bearish
signaling that sideways to lower prices near-term are still possible.

July Henry Hub natural gas was higher overnight as it continues to
consolidate above last October's low crossing at 3.86. Multiple
closes above last week's high crossing at 4.075 would increase the
odds that a short-term bottom has been posted. Short-term momentum
indicators have become oversold warning bears not to press their hand
as downside risk appears limited for the time being.

CURRENCIES

The September Euro was higher overnight as a combination of euro-
supportive and yen-negative comments from various central bankers
appears to have given the currency a modest bounce. It will take
closes above last week's high crossing at 85.70 to temper the
near-term bearish outlook in the market. If the decline continues, a
test of last October's lows crossing at 83.77 is possible later this
month. The daily ADX (a trend-following indicator) is still bearish
signaling that sideways to lower prices are possible into early-June
are possible.

The September British Pound opened higher due to light short covering
overnight hinting that last Friday's low might have completed the
setback from last Wednesday's high. Momentum indicators are neutral
to bullish, which suggests that sideways to higher prices into
early-June are possible. If the rebound off May's low resumes,
trendline resistance crossing near 1.4290 is September's next target.

The September Swiss Franc opened higher overnight and is challenging
last week's gap, which led to a breakout into new contract lows. It
would take closes above last Wednesday's high of .5644 to temper the
bearish outlook in the market. Until then, the door is open for a
test of weekly support crossing at .5488 later this month following
last week's breakout below last October's low crossing at .5643. The
ADX (a trend-following indicator) is bearish signaling that
additional weakness during June is possible.

The September Canadian Dollar was higher overnight and remains poised
for a test of May's high crossing at .6541 later this week. Closes
above .6541 are needed to confirm an upside breakout of May's trading
range thereby renewing this spring's rally. Momentum indicators have
turned bullish signaling that sideways to higher prices during the
first half of June are possible.

The September Japanese Yen was lower overnight due to light profit
taking. Nevertheless, last week's breakout above trading range
resistance has opened the door for additional gains this spring. If
the yen's rally continues, minor resistance crossing at .8702 is the
next target later this month. The daily ADX (a trend-following
indicator) has entered a bullish trend mode signaling that additional
strength is possible.

PRECIOUS METALS

August comex gold is working on a possible inside day but was lower
overnight as it remains poised to extend its decline off May's high
following last Thursday's breakout below April's uptrend line
crossing near 267.50. If August gold resumes its decline, a test of
this spring's low crossing at 257.30 is a potential target later this
year. Stochastics and RSI are bearish signaling that additional
weakness into June is likely.

July silver was slightly lower overnight as it is working on a
possible inside day. A lower close during the day session would
signal an end to last Friday's short covering bounce. Momentum
indicators have turned bearish signaling that additional weakness
near-term is possible. If the decline off May's high continues, a
test of the lower boundary of this spring's trading range crossing at
4.31 is July's next target later this month.

July copper was slightly higher overnight due to light short covering
as it has become slightly oversold on a short-term basis following
last week's decline. However, the door remains open for a test of
May's low crossing at 74.75 later this month. Momentum indicators are
bearish signaling that sideways to lower prices into early-June
appears likely. Closes below May's low could lead to a test of weekly
support crossing at 74.10 later this spring.

GRAINS

July corn was lower overnight as traders await this morning's export
inspection report and this afternoon's planting progress and crop
conditions reports. Cool/wet weather across the western Corn Belt has
slowed early crop development and has forced some replanting as some
areas have experienced excessive moisture, which has drowned out some
of the crop. For the most part traders do not seem too concerned over
planting delays in the western Corn Belt but do have their eye on a
potential drought, which might be developing in China. Last Friday's
gap and close above May's downtrend line crossing at 1.93 1/4
strongly suggests that a short-term low has likely been posted. If
July extends last week's short covering rally, a test of May's high
crossing at 2.11 1/2 is the next upside target. Early calls are for
July corn to open 2 to 2 1/4 cents lower this morning.

July wheat was lower in overnight trading due light profit taking
following last Friday's test of May's uptrend line. Losses were
limited due to disease concerns in Kansas and last week's strong
export sales report. Multiple closes above May's downtrend line,
which crosses near 2.72, would signal that a short-term bottom has
been posted. While supply side fundamentals remain bullish, export
demand needs to show significant improvement in order for July wheat
to sustain a late-spring rally. One of the most important things that
could happen to help sluggish wheat exports would be to see the U.S.
Dollar fall from current levels. Early calls are for July wheat to
open 1 to 1 1/4 cents lower this morning.

SOYBEAN COMPEX

July soybeans were lower in overnight trading due to light profit
taking as the market consolidates some of last week's gains. Last
week's breakout above this spring's trading range along with closes
above recent highs crossing at 4.53 1/2 have opening the door for a
possible test of March's high crossing at 4.77 3/4 later this month.
Cool/wet weather across the Midwest Soybean Belt has raised concerns
over emergence and planting delays. Traders will be closely watching
today's export inspection, planting progress and crop conditions
reports for near-term direction in the market. Early calls are for
July soybeans to open 1 to 1 1/4 cents lower this morning.

July soybean meal was steady overnight despite last Friday's downside
reversal. Stronger than expected export demand last week along with a
tight domestic cash market continues to underpin the meal market.
July meal is at an important crossroads and will need to close above
168 or below 159.60 to clear up near-term direction in the market.
Short-term momentum indicators are still bearish warning bulls that
closes into new highs for this spring are needed to renew the rally
off March's low. Early calls are for July soybean meal to open steady
this morning.

LIVESTOCK

August hogs closed sharply higher for the fourth day in a row filling
April's gap crossing at 64.90. The stage is set for additional gains
and a likely test of April's high crossing at 65.95 later this month.
This week's rally underpinned by fund buying is due in part to
futures discount to the cash market and ideas that loin prices should
bottom next week. Momentum indicators are bullish signaling that
sideways to higher prices into early-June are possible.

August cattle closed out the week on a high note as the stage is set
for a test of January's high crossing at 75.00 next week. The
discount of futures to the cash market along with higher cash bids
this week continues to underpin August's rally. Momentum indicators
are bullish but have become overbought warning traders to use caution
as a top may be near.

FOOD & FIBER

July coffee closed higher on Friday due to light short covering ahead
of the weekend. However, a sell off ahead of the close tempered much
of today's early gains leaving the door open for sideways to lower
prices next week. This week's breakout into new contract lows has
opened the door for a test of long-term support crossing at 51.70
later this month.

July cocoa closed higher on Friday due to light short covering
following Thursday's breakout below trading range support crossing at
955. Momentum indicators remain bearish despite their oversold
condition hinting that additional weakness into early-June is
possible. If the decline continues, the 75% retracement level at 862
is July's next target.

July sugar closed higher on Friday due to light short covering as it
consolidates around the 38% retracement level of this spring's rally
crossing at 857. Momentum indicators remain bearish signaling that
sideways to lower prices next week is still possible. If the decline
continues, fib support crossing at 832 then 808 are targets.

July cotton extended this week's short covering rally as it
consolidates above psychological support crossing at 40-cents. Light
support came from today's export sales report that came in at 107,300
bales. Additional support came from news of some 300,000 to 350,000
acres of west Texas cotton being destroyed by flooding. However,
upside potential remains limited due to this year's burdensome
carryout levels, which are expected to grow in the coming year.
_____________________________________________________________________

extreme SIGNALS - Daily Trade Alerts - Only 20 Spaces Left!
_____________________________________________________________________

>>> DOUBLE YOUR MONEY TRADES <<<
>>> EXCLUSIVELY REVEALED <<<
>>> BY IOWA SOYBEAN FARMER <<<

Dear Andrew:

Family farmer, hedger and trader Ken Seehusen has agreed to
send you his private personal trading signals.

For years Ken has produced extraordinary profits for
himself and an elite group of friends and traders. Today,
INO.com offers a small window of opportunity for you to
join them!

Ken achieves what few traders can...

...he keeps losses and commissions to a minimum while
letting winners run.  It all adds up to BIG PROFITS
for 'extreme SIGNALS' members!

In fact, his average profit is $1,153.11 while his average
loss is just $222.09. Just a few weeks ago, Ken's short-
sale recommendation in Pork Bellies brought home profits of
$3,780 per contract!

Because of Ken's consistent triple digit performance, the
remaining membership slots are filling quickly.

Act Now To Reserve Your Space
- New Member Service Begins June 1!
- ONLY 20 POSITIONS AVAILABLE!

http://store.ino.com/sale/1A433/SUBXSIG-extremeSIGNALS

Click for extreme SIGNALS

Order Toll Free 800-538-7424 - 410-867-7424

All claims on third-party products are made by the publisher
and not by INO.com. All Products Guaranteed.

_____________________________________________________________________

T H A N K   Y O U
_____________________________________________________________________

Thank you for subscribing to the Morning Extreme Markets from INO.com
( http://www.ino.com/ ). If you want to subscribe to our other email
services, or would like to modify your profile please visit
http://www.ino.com/email/.

To subscribe a friend, visit:
  http://www.ino.com/email/

To unsubscribe, visit:
  http://www.ino.com/email/remove/?email=alewis@enron.com&list=morning

--
Copyright 1998-2001 INO.com. All Rights Reserved.


Start Date: 4/25/01; HourAhead hour: 13;  HourAhead schedule download failed.
Manual intervention required.


Debra,
 Can you please respond to Phil.
----- Forwarded by Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT on 06/13/2001 11:07 AM -----

	Phil DeMoes/ENRON@enronXgate
	06/13/2001 09:04 AM

		 To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Oglethorpe GISB

Dan,

Oglethorpe mentioned that they have sent the GISB back signed.  Did we
receive it?


Chris:
Here are the comps we put together for merchant peaker plants.  Please give
me a call if you have any questions. Thanks!
Ben
3-7998


My mail stop is EB 3125A

Chris Dorland


You are cordially invited to the ETS North Operations
2001 Safety Award Banquet

AT THE

Omaha Marriott Hotel

ON

July 27, 2001

TIME

6:00 pm - Social Hour
7:00 pm -  Dinner
8:00 pm - Program

IN RECOGNITION OF

The achievement of employees receiving a 2001 Safety Award

Please RSVP by e-mail to Judy Kudym
We look forward to seeing you.
 Attachment:   list of awardees   ...

                            Won't you give us the pleasure of your company?
  ETS North Safety Team
Danny Quint, Brian Oeffner, Dee Hanson, Andy Gieser, Gary Allen
    ETS North Operations Management Team
Mike Nelson, Tom Gilbert, Mac McGillivray, Tom Mertz, Dave Odneal

<Embedded Microsoft Clip Gallery>


Here is the attachment.  Sorry.

John

The Johnco Group, LLC
3629 Lake Kristin Drive
Gretna, LA 70056

Phone  (504) 392-7557
Cell      (504) 491-2784
Fax      (208) 730-4713

 - accrualspreadsheetJAC.xls


Barry,

I would like to focus our deal flow on Apr-Oct or 1 yr San Juan and Rockies
supply.  Our fundamental investment is mainly in the rockies for 2001.  Let's
get together with Mark Whitt, Paul Lucci, and others to set our supply goals
for the mainly the apr-oct period.  I would like to work on buying every
mmbtu of Opal, and all points included in the IF NW Rockies index.  Our goal
should be to purchase at least 400,000/d of rockies supply and 500,000/d of
San Juan Blanco and Bondad.  we have been buying these phys index points at
+.01 in the rockies and +.005 in the San Juan.  You may need to coordinate
with Fred Lagrosta's group initially to get all of their producer contacts.

Thanks,
Mike


Thanksgiving Luncheon Menu
Wednesday, November 15, 2000

Meats
Turkey & Dressing w/Gravy
Honey Baked Ham

Salads
Macaroni Salad
Fruit Salad
Garden Salad
Carrot Salad
Potato Salad
Pasta Salad

Vegetables/Sides
Cranberry Sauce
Green Bean Casserole
Green Bean Almondine
Jalapeno Corn Casserole
Sweet Potato Casserole
Broccoli & Rice Casserole
Mashed Potatoes
Green Beans
Corn

Breads
Potato Buns
Rolls
Bread
Garlic Bread
Sausage Bread

Desserts
Apple Pie
Rum Cake
Pecan Pie
Strawberry Cake
Surprise Cake
Greek Cookies
Pound Cake

All food (except Turkey & Dressing) will be kept cold, due to the number of
people and the length the food will be sitting out.  We have access to the
microwaves on the 37th, 21st floors and cafeteria area.  Thanks to everyone
for their contributions, it should be a EXCELLENT FEAST!!


FYI!!
---------------------- Forwarded by Aimee Lannou/HOU/ECT on 11/21/2000 10:11
AM ---------------------------

"Kevin Olson" <olson@espllp.com> on 11/21/2000 10:14:11 AM
To: "Amy Lannou" <alannou@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: FW: Energy Service Providers (MCNIC)/Lyondell Noms - December 2000

Amy,

I enjoyed visiting with you today and look forward to working with you in
the future.

Per our conversation, please find below our noms for December.

Please call should you have any questions or need any additional
information.

Thanks!

Kevin Olson

-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Olson [mailto:olson@espllp.com]
Sent: Monday, November 20, 2000 4:04 PM
To: Susan Hadix
Cc: Janice Berke-Davis
Subject: Energy Service Providers (MCNIC)/Lyondell Noms - December 2000

Susan,

Please note that the MCNIC noms for December, 2000 into the Lyondell
Channelview plant via HPL will be 10,000 mmbtu/day.

Please call should you have any questions.

Thanks!

Kevin E. Olson
Energy Service Providers, LLP
1521 Green Oak Place #170
Kingwood, Texas  77339
Phone:  281-359-4610
Fax:    281-359-4656
Email:  Olson@espllp.com


| notifications                                                            |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+

Cortez, Jose added to Uran Man's rosters, and Wilkins, Jeff dropped.
If you have a cell phone or pager, you can get this information even sooner! Go to your league's web site and click "Options, Notifications" on the main toolbar to have notifications sent to your pager or phone, via text messaging.

Win a VIP Vegas Vacation! OR Win $600 CASH!
http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/1/223/sffn1002v.cgi
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|        Copyright 2001 Commissioner.COM Inc and SportsLine.com Inc.       |
|   Your site is always at http://football.fantasy.sportsline.com/getbad   |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+

FB10SP


The Enron Center garage will be opening very soon.

Employees who work for business units that are scheduled to move to the new
building and currently park in the Allen Center or Met garages are being
offered a parking space in the new Enron Center garage.

This is the only offer you will receive during the initial migration to the
new garage. Spaces will be filled on a first come first served basis. The
cost for the new garage will be the same as Allen Center garage which is
currently $165.00 per month, less the company subsidy, leaving a monthly
employee cost of $94.00.

If you choose not to accept this offer at this time, you may add your name to
the Enron Center garage waiting list at a later day and offers will be made
as spaces become available.

The Saturn Ring  that connects the garage and both buildings will not be
opened until summer 2001. All initial parkers will have to use the street
level entrance to Enron Center North until Saturn Ring access is available.
Garage stairways next to the elevator lobbies at each floor may be used as an
exit in the event of elevator trouble.

If you are interested in accepting this offer, please reply via email to
Parking and Transportation as soon as you reach a decision. Following your
email, arrangements will be made for you to turn in your old parking card and
receive a parking transponder along with a new information packet for the new
garage.

The Parking and Transportation desk may be reached via email at Parking and
Transportation/Corp/Enron or 713-853-7060  with any questions.

(You must enter & exit on Clay St. the first two weeks, also pedestrians,
will have to use the garage stairwell located on the corner of Bell & Smith.)


Dallas at meter 986789 would like to decrease from 12079 to 12000. Let me
know  " D "


Ty,

Can we extend this deal for Sinclair and reduce their price?

Here are the deals they currently have, notice two have expired.


Fax me the contract so that I can share this info with the trader.
713-646-2496.  Thanks.
PL


Let me know how your Drs appt goes.  I'll have to let you know later about Fri.  -- got some scheduling things up in the air.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jewell, Cyndi M [mailto:cjewell@bcm.tmc.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 10:55 AM
To: Corman, Shelley
Subject: Re: Can you go to lunch today?

I'd love to go but an at the doctor's office now and then have a March of
Dimes lunch for our Baylor team captains. How about Friday?
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


For your files.  I sent the executables to Lauri Allen.

---------------------- Forwarded by Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT on 04/19/2000 03:20
PM ---------------------------

Rodney Rogers@ENRON
04/19/2000 02:39 PM
To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Ginger Causey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin Kuehler/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lauri A
Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Revised Cost Estimate w/o Income Tax Gross-up Charge for Temporary
Meter & Regulator Station for Midcon Carbon Black

Gerald,

As agreed, I think that we need to send Midcon first two pages of cost
estimate to cut down on questions.  Attached is the file.  Call with
questions.

Thanks,

Rodney


While we await this infromation to be added to STAR here is a spread sheet
with the clock acronyms.  It may be helpful to pull into Splus as a dataframe
from use?

JD
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeff Duff/EWC/Enron on 05/31/2002 11:26
AM ---------------------------

Jeff Duff
05/24/2002 02:30 PM
To: Patricia Hunter/EWC/Enron@ENRON
cc: Rabi Sahoo/EWC/Enron@ENRON

Subject: FAULTS CLOCK field

Patricia,

The attached spread sheet contains the fault number and corresponding CLOCK
acronym.  For simplicity, we can call the new field CLOCK and it should be
var(4).

If there any questions let me know.

Thanks,

JD


you going to do it?  buy a ticket for  a weekend in jan.  We will go to vt and ski

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Smith, Matt [mailto:Matt.Smith@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Wednesday, November 14, 2001 8:17 AM
To:	David Shank
Subject:	RE: What is going on?

FYI, Northwest is having that airfare sale again.  Houston to White Plains...120 bucks...

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	David Shank [mailto:david.shank@penobscot.net]
Sent:	Wednesday, November 07, 2001 10:17 AM
To:	Smith, Matt
Subject:	RE: What is going on?

you buy a place or are you still renting?  I can't imagine that the company will go totally bust.  got any trips out east planned?
ever work out a ski trip?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Smith, Matt [mailto:Matt.Smith@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Wednesday, November 07, 2001 11:16 AM
To:	David Shank
Subject:	RE: What is going on?

it's a little iffy right now...
i'm planning for not having one, although i'll in the one place that the company is trying to preserve.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	David Shank [mailto:david.shank@penobscot.net]
Sent:	Wednesday, November 07, 2001 10:03 AM
To:	Smith, Matt
Subject:	RE: What is going on?

you going to have a job when this is all over?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Smith, Matt [mailto:Matt.Smith@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Wednesday, November 07, 2001 10:56 AM
To:	David Shank
Subject:	RE: What is going on?

well...here we are.  i'm still not buying.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	David Shank [mailto:david.shank@penobscot.net]
Sent:	Tuesday, November 06, 2001 11:55 AM
To:	Smith, Matt
Subject:	RE: What is going on?

Word....when will it be a good buy? 8 ??

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Smith, Matt [mailto:Matt.Smith@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Tuesday, November 06, 2001 12:03 PM
To:	David Shank
Subject:	RE: What is going on?

told you so...

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	David Shank [mailto:david.shank@penobscot.net]
Sent:	Thursday, November 01, 2001 8:12 AM
To:	Smith, Matt
Subject:	What is going on?

Damn ENE is looking cheap.  Almost picked up a few shares at 12.5.  What do you think?  buy or wait?

______________________________________________

David Shank
Financial Analyst
Penobscot Corporation
545 Cedar Lane
Teaneck, NJ  07666
Tel. (201) 836-0099
Fax (201) 836-3862
Email david.shank@penobscot.net

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Enron needs a day (maybe less) of your time, hopefully this week.

We have to submit our proposed exhibits on July 3, 2001.  I am leaving for
Peru on Sunday 6/17, not returning until 7/6 (after the list is due, unless
the final status conference changes).

I have gone through my high priority documents and listed potential exhibits. I would like you to come out to our offices and go thru (1) the accordions of
key docs that you put together earlier this year and (2) all of the deposition
exhibits, to see what should be added to my list.

I am not trying to pack our list.  In fact I would like NOT to list (a) any
document that we are sure one or more of the other parties will submit (e.g.,
I haven't put any of the offering memos or road show slides on the list) or
(b) any document that contains anything negative for us, unless there is also
something very positive in the document that we really need (e.g., I haven't
listed Brian's memo re topics for Management Company discussion or any of the
work by the Enron auditors in August-September 1998.)

The reason that I would like you to do this work this week is so that I can
discuss any questions you come up with before I leave.  I will be in traveling
and in NY on Tues-Thurs, but you can come here on any of those days; I'll be
back in the office on Friday (6/15); we could talk out any questions then.

Let me know what you can do.
                                                                                ................................................

ALSCHULER GROSSMAN STEIN & KAHAN LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
www.agsk.com

2049 Century Park East
Thirty-Ninth Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90067-3213
Tel 310-277-1226
Fax 310-552-6077

This transmission is intended only for the use
of the addressee and may contain information
that is privileged, confidential and exempt from
disclosure under applicable law. If you are not
the intended recipient, or the employee or agent
responsible for delivering the message to the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
any dissemination, distribution or copying of
this communication is strictly prohibited.

If you have received this communication
in error, please notify us immediately
via e-mail at postmaster@agsk.com or
by telephone at 310-277-1226. Thank you.

...............................................


Chris/Ben,

We had discussed having two change orders so that the ESA stuff is easily
identifiable/assignable/etc.  Is this still the plan?

Kay

	From:  Chris Booth                           08/29/2000 02:43 PM

To: Kathleen Clark/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kay
Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, John R Ayres/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: LM6000 Change Order #2 - Revised

In addition, the dual fuel cost will be split between ESA and ENA ($280,000
to ENA and $280,000 to ESA).

Chris
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Booth/NA/Enron on 08/29/2000 02:34
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Chris Booth                           08/29/2000 02:34 PM

To: Kathleen Clark/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kay
Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, John R Ayres/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: LM6000 Change Order #2 - Revised

Kathy and Kay,

I have revised change order #2 to account for the additional scope added by
ESA.  Please review  and comment.  I did not change the effective date.

For information purposes, all but item "b" are attributed to ESA.

Regards,

Chris


Aslo where all my traders that I assigned.


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 02/15/2001 08:15 AM -----

	Joseph Alamo
	02/14/2001 11:50 AM

		 To: Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron
		 cc: Lysa Akin/PDX/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Sac Bee, Tues 2/13 Editorial: "Lawmakers failed to respond to
energy alarm"

---------------------- Forwarded by Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron on 02/14/2001 09:48
AM ---------------------------

	Joseph Alamo
	02/13/2001 04:57 PM

To: Miyung Buster/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: Sac Bee, Tues 2/13 Editorial: "Lawmakers failed to respond to energy
alarm"

Lawmakers failed to respond to energy alarm

(Published Feb. 13, 2001)

Now that state lawmakers have begun an inquiry to determine what caused
California's energy crisis, they might want to take a look in the mirror.
Not at the infamous 1996 vote that triggered the partial deregulation of the
electricity industry. The remains of that law have been picked over enough.
Besides, most of the people who voted for it have already left the
Legislature, thanks to term limits.
But there was another vote last June, far less heralded and still little
known. It came just as warning bells were starting to signal the onset of
what has since become a crippling crisis. The Legislature not only ignored
those alarms, it stood in the way of the people who were trying to respond.
Why it did so remains something of a mystery. How it did so says a lot about
the way the Legislature works.
At issue was the now-defunct California Power Exchange. This was a
state-mandated auction, until recently the only place that utilities were
allowed to shop for the electricity that lights our homes and businesses. By
last June there were ominous signs that the power exchange, known as the PX,
wasn't working right. Prices were higher than anyone expected. The supply of
energy seemed thinner than was reasonable. There were enormous overhead
costs.
The power exchange was a bit like having a single automobile auction where
everyone who wanted to buy or sell a car had to do business. In times of
surplus this might work, because the sellers would underbid each other to
unload their cars to reluctant buyers. But in a shortage, the opposite would
be true. Buyers, with no place else to go, would pay ever-higher prices to
get what they needed. That's what was happening with electricity.
A majority of the Public Utilities Commission decided to do something about
it. The PUC voted 3-2 to allow privately formed exchanges to compete with the
state-sanctioned auction. At least two private exchanges were promising to
deliver more power at lower prices with fewer administrative costs. The
commission wanted to let them give it a try.
But before the PUC could even implement the change, the Legislature
intervened. Acting with unusual speed, lawmakers overturned the commission's
decision.
Assembly Bill 2866 was a classic legislative bill, in the worst sense. A
cobbled-together collection of 28 unrelated items, it was drafted in a hurry
as a companion to the new state budget. One of the bill's many parts was a
provision to subsidize California's film industry. That got a lot of
attention. The paragraph overturning the PUC's attempt to head off the energy
crisis got next to none. The bill was amended in the Senate on June 15 and
approved later that day. The Assembly passed it the next day, and Gov. Gray
Davis signed it.
The analysis of the bill that members saw in the Assembly was cryptic and
misleading. It said the bill would authorize the PUC to study the idea of
allowing competition for the state-mandated exchange. That was true as far as
it went. But the analysis omitted the fact that the bill's real intent was
just the opposite: to reverse a PUC decision and prohibit competing exchanges
for at least a year.
"California had made a big investment in the power exchange," said Sen. Jim
Brulte, R-Rancho Cucamonga, who was one of probably just a handful of
legislators who knew about the provision before it became law. "The PUC
decision would have put that investment at risk." Which is another way of
saying that the power exchange wasn't working and had to be protected from
competition.
Richard Bilas, the PUC commissioner who was pushing the hardest for the
reform the Legislature overturned, said he never liked the idea of mandating
a single exchange in which the utilities would have to buy all their power.
Bilas wasn't a member of the commission when the PUC restructured
California's electricity industry. But he said the result reminded him of the
former Soviet Union, where leaders declared that they were going to move to a
market economy and then appointed a group of central planners to figure out
how those markets should function.
"Markets are not based on fictitious or created exchanges," he said. "Markets
are based on buyers and sellers coming face to face to negotiate a deal. You
don't establish beforehand something that may not be necessary."
It's still not clear whether opening up the markets would have prevented the
price spikes that have since nearly bankrupted the utilities, forcing the
state to step in and buy electricity to keep the lights on. It might be a
stretch to suggest that any single policy change could have prevented the
crisis. But we will never know.
The Legislature, acting in haste and with little information, kept us from
finding out. The California Power Exchange, which the Legislature was so
eager to protect from competition, collapsed of its own weight anyway, and is
now out of business.
The law preventing other exchanges from entering the market was quietly
repealed two weeks ago, seven very long months after it was adopted.


so what about the airport?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Wednesday, November 21, 2001 1:52 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

ok next week

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Wednesday, November 21, 2001 1:51 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

i tried for the bar and i got shot down, but you can buy me a birthday drink next week.  i am sad.  i would rather work than got to conroe.  i would love to get on a plane and leave and never come back.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Wednesday, November 21, 2001 1:50 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

lets just try for the bar first

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Wednesday, November 21, 2001 1:50 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

ok so let me know what time i need to be at the airport.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Wednesday, November 21, 2001 1:49 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

absolutely

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Wednesday, November 21, 2001 1:48 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:

can we go to new york tonight?


THIS MESSAGE IS BEING SENT OUT ON BEHALF OF GREG NIKKEL AND KIM LESLEY

Below is a summary of our activities this past week

Accomplishments:
Delivered workshops at NEPCO
Gained agreement with NEPCO on status of showstopper reports
Scheduled India' s workshops for next week
Rolled out (to NEPCO) the user manuals developed

Upcoming:
Complete gathering of data points and begin to layout longer term strategy
(Elaine and Kim)
Develop additional workshops (design and data flow, consolidations and
intercompany)
Develop and deliver second evaluation
Roll out manuals to user group in Houston

Where are we at?
We should be able to ask more specific questions in our follow up evaluation
to get better data on what specifically they don't like about the reporting
out of SAP but as a rule so far we have consistently heard the issue of
management quality reports, ability to pull data from across modules (ie. HR
and PS data) and I can't get the data the way I want to see it therefore I
don't understand what the data is telling me.

This last point will be helped by these workshops (ability to view the data
in mulitple ways) but only to the extent where people use the tools available
and spend a little time to work with the system.  The design sessions
(upcoming) should help address some of these questions aswell - one big
learning from this has been that the majority of users do not understand
their business unit design or the overall design and therefore can't figure
out what the system data is telling them.  This is being addressed in the 7/1
training plan and will also be addressed in the long term reporting strategy.

Thanks, again if you have any questions please contact Melissa, Greg or
myself.

Kim Lesley


Dear Bill, Kate, and Les,

   I wanted to let you all know what we are doing concerning deals # 524528.1 (purchase from Willamet)  and 524529.1 (sale to PACE).
I believe that we are all now familiar with the details of these deals.   Mike, Geir, Les, and I have spent a combined 4 hours or more researching this deal over the last month.  Our last resort is to pull the tapes.  As we do not have access to our tapes and I am not sure when we will have them back, we have decided to do the following until we have the tapes back and can verify that the sale to PAC did take place:

* I have extended the sale of 4 MW's of Willamet generation to PAC to include HE 13.
* I have TEMPORARILY zero'd out the HE 14-24 piece of this deal on the PAC side with notes

As the payment is 3 months overdue, we will pay now and get reimbursed if we find that we are correct.

Please share any thoughts with me that you may have.

Thanks to everyone for your help in researching this.

Virginia


We have received the executed Confidentiality Agreement with the referenced
Counterparty dated May 29, 2000.  A copy will be sent to Dave Samuels.


Lee,

FYI.  Enron Methanol has been taking about 5,000 swing each day for August.
So, I added 5,000 for September (#139057 @ GD) in addition to the 34,000 they
nom'd.

D
---------------------- Forwarded by Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT on 08/25/2000
03:02 PM ---------------------------

Michael Mitcham@ENRON
08/25/2000 02:39 PM
To: David Bush/ECF/Enron@Enron, Mark Diedrich/GPGFIN/Enron@Enron, Paul
Fox/ECF/Enron@Enron, David M Johnson/ECF/Enron@Enron, Robert
Lee/ECF/Enron@Enron, Thomas Meers/GPGFIN/Enron@Enron, Maritta
Mullet/GPGFIN/Enron@Enron, James Prentice/GPGFIN/Enron@Enron, Kerry
Roper/GPGFIN/Enron@Enron, Sally Shuler/GPGFIN/Enron@Enron, Daren J
Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lee L Papayoti/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven M Elliott/HOU/ECT@ECT,
John L Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anita Luong/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gregg Lenart/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: NATURAL GAS NOMINATION FOR 09/00

Enron Methanol nominates the following natural gas requirements for the
Methanol Plant for September 2000:

34,000 mmbtu per day

EGPFC nominates the following natural gas requirements for the MTBE Plant at
Morgan's Point for September 2000:

9,000 mmbtu per day