Tammy,

As discussed in the meeting this morning, here is the proposed order of training topics and breakout of training sessions for NNG:

Accounting Course 1:	1-1/2 hrs.

Envision
Close Calendar
Journal Vouchers and Flash Review

Accounting Course 2:	1-1/2 hrs.

SAP/Business Objects
A/R Reconciliation & Collection/Late Pay Charges
Imbalance Cashout Invoices & Calculations/OBA Imbalances

Accounting Course 3:	1-1/2 - 2 hrs.

GVA/TAS
Rolling Priorities
DDVC/SOL/SUL/SMS
Pathing/Out of Balance

Accounting Course 1 covers the accounting basics everyone uses, and covers the entire pipe.  This is the lowest level of difficulty.
Accounting Course 2 encompasses SAP, report retrieval, A/R reconciliation and imbalances, these skills are used on a daily basis.  This is a more intermediate level course.
Accounting Course 3 is more advanced accounting training, covering the accounting systems GVA and TAS, and the more complex reports for variances and pathing.  DDVC's and rolling priorities are more specific to the north end of the pipe.

Renee Perry  J


okay

Julian Poole
03/17/2000 10:35 AM
To: Michael Guerriero/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Vince J Kaminski@ECT, Grant Masson@ECT, Jeff
Kabel/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rodolfo
Freyre/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Diego
Hollweck/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Bernardo
Andrews/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mario Aguilar
Benitez/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Santiago
Porta/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Re: Argentina Power & Gas Market Modelling

All,
Let's arrange a conference call next week to discuss the process.
How does Tuesday afternoon fit everyone's schedule?

Julian

	Enron International

	From:  Michael Guerriero                           03/17/2000 03:49 PM

To: Vince J Kaminski@ECT, Grant Masson@ECT, Jeff
Kabel/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Julian
Poole/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rodolfo
Freyre/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Diego
Hollweck/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Bernardo
Andrews/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mario Aguilar
Benitez/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Santiago
Porta/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:
Subject: Argentina Power & Gas Market Modelling

I would like to initiate a team to address the continued improvement of the
Argentine Power & Gas Market Models. I spoke with Vince this morning and we
reviewed that history of work to date and what we will need to do from here.
A summary is as follows:

Team:
 BA Members:  Julian Poole Lead
    Mario Benitez Associate

 BA Associates: Diego Hollweck Associate
    Bernardo Andrews Associate
    Santiago Porta Associate

 Houston Members: To be named.

Time Schedule: As soon as possible. Completed before June 1, 2000 winter in
Argentina.

Scope of Work:
Power Model:  Advance the current model from basic load forecasting to
incorporate weather, hydrology, improved short term and long term forecasting.

Natural Gas Model: Build a supply and demand load forecasting model
incorporating weather, thermal demand, pipeline flow rates, well head
supply,     improved short term and long term forecasting.

Phase I-Data Request

 Power
  Historic Weather: Temperature-Daily, Hourly, Min, Max, Average
     Humidity
     Precipitation
     Cloud Cover
     Regionally

  Forward Weather: Temperature-Daily, Hourly, Min, Max, Average
     Humidity
     Precipitation
     Cloud Cover
     Regionally

  Historic Hydrology: Reservoir levels
     Reservoir capacity

  Current Hydrology: Reservoir levels
     Remote monitoring:Aireal, pressure device, laser

  Snow Pack:  Density volume and mass

  Power Supply: Current and future capacity

  Transmission
  Capacity:   Current and future capacity

 Natural Gas   Data list to be developed

Phase II- Power Model Development

Phase III-Natural Gas Model Development

We will take advantage of the fact that the associates are in Houston for the
next two weeks. Vince is out next week but we can start with a process
discussion with Grant Masson next week. Julian please get a meeting scheduled
as soon as possible. We should immediately start collecting data.

Thanks

MFG


Start Date: 1/9/02; HourAhead hour: 9;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002010909.txt


Larry Gagliardi has been with us for 6 months marketing EOL crude/products
for 6 months and has signed up well over 50 customers according to Nowlan.
He came from the crude and products broker TCT and knows the traders in the
business.  He's our guy, and I want to expand his role in the group, as well.


Carrie,
I am attaching my biography.  Please note the title you have in your
material is not accurate.  My current title is noted below.
 <<Biography CPN.doc>>

Lisa J Norwood
Director Fuel Management
phone 713-830-8632
fax 713-830-8711


Rick -

Attached is the January 2001 variance report for your review and files.  The
individual cost centers have some coding issues which need to be resolved but
overall your group is under budget $828,597 for the month.  There are some
coding issues within your cost center that we should discuss.

Call with any questions, comments or concerns.

Eric


[IMAGE]
 [IMAGE]    Search NYTimes.com  Today's News Past Week Past 30 Days Past 90 Days Past Year Since 1996
  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]       Customize This E-Mail   [IMAGE]  Customize This E-Mail
   February 5, 2002   QUOTE OF THE DAY "I got 3,500 over 10 years, but our friend, Kay Bailey Hutchison, she got 99,000. Heck, I'm the chairman of the committee. That wasn't a contribution. That was an insult."  ERNEST F. HOLLINGS, chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee, when asked if he had received contributions from Enron.   NATIONAL Bush's Aggressive Accounting  In short, the administration's strategy is to prevent criticism of what amounts to a fiscal debacle by wrapping its budget in the flag.   Cutting Taxes Faster Would Help Everyone  Government can't inject money into an economy unless it first   takes the money out.   Security Kicks in Before the Winter Games  With opening ceremonies just four days away, all the plans to keep the Winter Olympics  safe are kicking in.     MORE NATIONAL NEWS    Advertisement    Sign up now for exclusive Classical Music  concerts and premium content!  andante is your source for classical music  on the Internet. Exclusive concerts from the  most prestigious ensembles. Over 23,000  concerts listed. In-depth virtual library.  Sign up now and enjoy the benefits of Charter  Membership!   [IMAGE]   INTERNATIONAL Annan Cautions Business as World Forum Ends  The United Nations chief closed the World Economic Forum by telling business leaders that "business cannot afford to be seen as the problem."   Iraq Proposes U.N. Talks, and Gets a Wary Reply  Iraq's offer for talks had all the hallmarks of an attempt by its leader, Saddam Hussein, to build up international resistance to an American attack.   Israeli's Dual Job: Chief of Defense, and Dissent  The man proposing to lead a coalition to unseat the prime minister is also in charge of leading the military methods the coalition is attacking.     MORE INTERNATIONAL NEWS    BUSINESS Senators to Vote to Issue Subpoena to Ex-Enron Chief  Republicans and Democrats on the Senate Commerce Committee said they would vote Tuesday to issue a subpoena to compel an appearance by Kenneth L. Lay.   Deal at Enron Gave Insiders Quick Fortunes  A small group of insiders at Enron made millions in profits in secret deals with some of the partnerships that ultimately brought the company to its knees.   Ernst & Young Latest Auditor Moving to Alter Some Practices  Ernst & Young said that it would stop selling information technology services to companies it audits and that it would no longer serve as internal accountant and external auditor at the same company.     MORE BUSINESS NEWS    TECHNOLOGY Hewlett Lifts Profit Outlook and Each Side in War Exults  Both sides in the spirited proxy contest over Hewlett-Packard's plan to buy Compaq Computer pointed to HP's performance, which was better than expected, as proof of their claims.   Williams Companies Lists Possible Steps to Bolster Rating  The Williams Companies said that it planned to step up asset sales and that it might issue shares to strengthen its balance sheet and retain its investment-grade credit rating.   Muslims Feel Sept. 11 Chill as Mecca Plays It Safe  The Saudis have begun collecting personal data from Muslim visitors to start a system for tracking and identifying them.     MORE TECHNOLOGY NEWS    POLITICS As Troubles Multiply, the Budget Equation Changes  On Monday, President Bush sent Congress a new budget plan, which has little extra money for anything other than national security and tax cuts.   Senators to Vote to Issue Subpoena to Ex-Enron Chief  Republicans and Democrats on the Senate Commerce Committee said they would vote Tuesday to issue a subpoena to compel an appearance by Kenneth L. Lay.   Anti-Tax Leader Confesses He Used Campaign Money  Tim Eyman, a businessman who was the champion of several tax-cutting initiatives in Washington State, said on Monday that he had profited personally from political fund-raising drives.     MORE POLITICS NEWS    SPORTS When Push Came to Shove, Patriots Did Both  The Patriots exerted their will on the Rams and forced the Super Bowl to be played on their terms.   Introverted Coach Finally Out of His Shell  As a winning Super Bowl coach, the Patriots' Bill Belichick has attained a stature that for years was thought to be beyond his personality.   In Great Matchup, Only Nets Are Great  Led by Keith Van Horn's 25 points, the Nets took apart the Kings, who had the N.B.A.'s best record entering the lopsided game.     MORE SPORTS NEWS    ARTS Restoration of a Leonardo Is Ruled Out  Critics of the proposed restoration of "The Adoration of the Magi" see the decision as a moral victory and a personal vindication.   WNYC-FM Reassesses Program Format  Station managers are studying whether to cut back permanently on classical music as part of a larger plan to revamp all of its programming.   A Dead Man's Failed Muse and Lost Women  Athol Fugard's "Sorrows and Rejoicings" is a   play about irrevocably divided selves.     MORE ARTS NEWS    NY REGION Electricity Crisis Eases in New York  New York City, which faced an electricity crisis last summer, now has all the energy it needs through at least mid-2003 and perhaps beyond, experts say.   So Long New York, and Thanks for a Mostly Well-Ordered Bash  In the end, the World Economic Forum went off so smoothly that  aside from some minor traffic inconveniences  the lives of most New Yorkers were unaffected.   In Albany, School Boards Lose Backing  Black and Hispanic members of the State Assembly are saying New York City's community school boards have failed minority communities.     MORE NY REGION NEWS    OP-ED  Bush's Aggressive Accounting   By  PAUL KRUGMAN  In short, the administration's strategy is to prevent criticism of what amounts to a fiscal debacle by wrapping its budget in the flag.   The Wrong Lessons of the Somalia Debacle   By NICHOLAS D. KRISTOF  With luck, Afghanistan will again prove that helping war-torn third-world countries is a smarter policy than running away from them.   Is the Human Rights Era Ending?   By MICHAEL IGNATIEFF  If Washington   turns away, the human rights movement loses the   one government whose power can be   decisive in stopping human rights   abuses.     MORE OP-ED  NEWS    About This E-Mail You received these headlines because you requested The New York Times Direct e-mail service. To sign up for other newsletters, cancel delivery, change delivery options or your e-mail address, see http://www.nytimes.com/email .   Check or un-check the headlines you would like to receive or cancel and remember to go to the bottom of the page and click on "Save Selections."  Suggestions and feedback are welcome at feedback@nytimes.com .   Please include the following ID number when writing to feedback@nytimes.com   so that we can track any reports of problems: 7061593   How to Advertise For information on advertising in e-mail newsletters or other advertising opportunities with NYTimes.com, contact onlinesales@nytimes.com  or visit our online media kit .  Copyright 2002 The New York Times Company

[IMAGE]


pls print.  df
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 01/04/2001
03:12 PM ---------------------------

Shelley Corman
01/04/2001 12:46 PM
To: Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven
Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary
Darveaux/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Glen Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, fkelly@gbmdc.com
cc: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Handouts for TW Options Conference

Oops.

---------------------- Forwarded by Shelley Corman/ET&S/Enron on 01/04/2001
12:49 PM ---------------------------

Shelley Corman
01/04/2001 12:44 PM
To:

Subject: Handouts for TW Options Conference

Per our discussion yesterday, here is Susan's and my first cut at handout
pages for the tech conf.  We will discuss at our 11:30 am meeting tomorrow.


Can you include the desk to desk summary in this email each day?  The title of the report is Enorn North America Corp. (Deal Detail Listing Counterparty).  It lists all desk to desk trades by book.

Thanks,
Mike
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Pehlivanova, Biliana
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 3:15 PM
To:	Allen, Phillip K.; Ermis, Frank; Gay, Randall L.; Grigsby, Mike; Holst, Keith; Kuykendall, Tori; Lenhart, Matthew; Reitmeyer, Jay; Scott, Susan M.; Smith, Matt; South, Steven P.; Tholt, Jane M.; Wolfe, Jason
Subject:	Broker Report

 << File: 1119.xls >>


Andy,
Mark Greenberg, myself and the attorney for TFS are working out the details for the definitive agreement.  The revised copy was sent out this afternoon.  If all goes well, it should close next week.  There are a few issues that could delay it but the chances of that happening are low.

TradeSpark was eager to see a contract.  I had an agreement sent out yesterday to Michael Williams that included North American Natural Gas, Power, Coal, Emissions, Broadband and Weather for $500,000.  Of course, Michael wanted to discuss putting the prices on TradeSpark.  I told him that the contract will only deal with the ability to transact on behalf of his clients.  Hopefully, we can leave it there but I doubt that's the last we'll hear of it.

-Dan


stl -14  200

stl det over 49.5 200


Mark,

Here is a draft of an outline for the equity offering for Capacity Trading.

Please call when you have a few minutes to discuss documentation and legal
issues.

Thanks,

Dave


Travis thought you'd get a kick out of this...

---------------------- Forwarded by Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT on 11/20/2000 10:48
AM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Travis David Kelley" <tdkelley@ev1.net>
11/02/2000 08:22 AM

Please respond to "Travis David Kelley" <tdkelley@ev1.net>
To: <Susan.M.Scott@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Fw: RULES OF AIR

Forward this to your dad please.  I lost his address.  Gracias.
----- Original Message -----
From: Michelle Eppright <michelle@epprighthomes.com>
To: KATHY & TRAVIS KELLEY <TDKELLEY@EV1.NET>
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2000 11:23 AM
Subject: RULES OF AIR

> YOU'VE GOT TO FORWARD THIS TO YOUR DAD!!
> :
> >
> >
> > Subject: Rules of Air
> >
> > This appeared in the current issue of Australian Aviation Magazine (June
> > 2000?)
> >
> > 1. Every takeoff is optional. Every landing is mandatory.
> > 2. If you push the stick forward, the houses get bigger. If you pull the
> > stick back, they get smaller. That is, unless you keep pulling the stick
> all
> > the way back, then they get bigger again.
> > 3. Flying isn't dangerous. Crashing is what's dangerous.
> > 4. It's always better to be down here wishing you were up there than up
> > there
> > wishing you were down here.
> > 5. The ONLY time you have too much fuel is when you're on fire.
> > 6. The propeller is just a big fan in front of the plane used to keep
the
> > pilot cool. When it stops, you can actually watch the pilot start
> sweating.
> > 7. When in doubt, hold on to your altitude. No one has ever collided
with
> > the
> > sky.
> > 8. A 'good' landing is one from which you can walk away. A 'great'
landing
> > is
> > one after which they can use the plane again.
> > 9. Learn from the mistakes of others. You won't live long enough to make
> all
> > of them yourself.
> > 10. You know you've landed with the wheels up if it takes full power to
> taxi
> > to the ramp.
> > 11. The probability of survival is inversely proportional to the angle
of
> > arrival. Large angle of arrival, small probability of survival and vice
> > versa.
> > 12. Never let an aircraft take you somewhere your brain didn't get to
five
> > minutes earlier.
> > 13. Stay out of clouds. The silver lining everyone keeps talking about
> might
> > be another airplane going in the opposite direction. Reliable sources
also
> > report that mountains have been known to hide out in clouds.
> > 14. Always try to keep the number of landings you make equal to the
number
> > of
> > take-offs you've made.
> > 15. There are three simple rules for making a smooth landing.
> Unfortunately
> > no one knows what they are.
> > 16. You start with a bag full of luck and an empty bag of experience.
The
> > trick is to fill the bag of experience before you empty the bag of luck.
> > 17. Helicopters can't fly; they're just so ugly the earth repels them.
> > 18. If all you can see out of the window is ground that's going round
and
> > round and all you can hear is commotion coming from the passenger
> > compartment, things are not at all as they should be.
> > 19. In the ongoing battle between objects made of aluminum going
hundreds
> of
> > miles per hour and the ground going zero miles per hour, the ground has
> yet
> > to lose.
> > 20. Good judgment comes from experience. Unfortunately, the experience
> > usually comes from bad judgment.
> > 21. It's always a good idea to keep the pointy end going forward as much
> as
> > possible.
> > 22. Keep looking around. There's always something you've missed.
> > 23. Remember, gravity is not just a good idea. It's the law. And it's
not
> > subject to repeal.
> > 24. The three most useless things to a pilot are the altitude above you,
> > runway behind you, and a tenth of a second ago
> > -----------------------------
> >
> > Here are some actual maintenance complaints submitted by US Air Force
> pilots
> > and the replies from the maintenance crews. "Squawks" are problem
listings
> > that pilots generally leave for maintenance crews to fix before the next
> > flight.
> >
> > (P)=PROBLEM (S)=SOLUTION
> >
> > (P) Left inside main tire almost needs replacement
> > (S) Almost replaced left inside main tire
> >
> > (P) Test flight OK, except autoland very rough,
> > (S) Autoland not installed on this aircraft
> >
> > (P) #2 Propeller seeping prop fluid,
> > (S) #2 Propeller seepage normal - #1 #3 and #4propellers  lack normal
> > seepage
> >
> > (P) Something loose in cockpit
> > (S) Something tightened in cockpit
> >
> > (P) Evidence of leak on right main landing gear
> > (S) Evidence removed
> >
> > (P) DME volume unbelievably loud
> > (S) Volume set to more believable level
> >
> > (P) Dead bugs on windshield
> > (S) Live bugs on order
> >
> > (P) Autopilot in altitude hold mode produces a200 fpm descent
> > (S) Cannot reproduce problem on ground
> >
> > (P) IFF inoperative
> > (S) IFF always inoperative in OFF mode
> >
> > (P) Friction locks cause throttle levers to stick
> > (S) That's what they're there for
> >
> > (P) Number three engine missing
> > (S) Engine found on right wing after brief search
> >
> > (P) Aircraft handles funny
> > (S) Aircraft warned to straighten up, "flyright" and be serious
> >
> > (P) Target Radar hums
> > (S) Reprogrammed Target Radar with the words
> >
> >
> >
>
>


hm # 713 972 1208 cell 713 304 1557 email bmckay@houston.rr.com
BMckay info


Bob, Steve Gilbert was not working on this, but he thought that the numbers
in 10ks and annual reports generally get filled in by Elaine Concklin or
someone based on ET&S numbers fed up throught the system by Gilbert's group.
For now, I'm leaving the blanks in this draft blank and explaining to Moran
that I have limited our review to the legal and regulatory verbiage.
Thanks.  DF
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 03/08/2000
01:25 PM ---------------------------

	Sharon Morgan
	03/08/2000 09:33 AM

To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Enron Form 10-K

Emily Sellers asked that I email the draft of the 10-K to you.  It is in 5
sections because we will eventually fold in the financials and the management
discussion pages.


The file's password is headcount.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Brown, Sarah
Sent:	Friday, December 14, 2001 4:49 PM
To:	Slone, Jeanie; Scott, Laura; Douglas, Steve H.  (Tax); Oxley, David; Haedicke, Mark E.; Thode, Eric; Tholan, Scott; Deffner, Joseph; Sherman, Cris; Wilson, Garry D.; Mays, Wayne; Kaminski, Vince J; Virgo, Robert
Cc:	Schield, Elaine; Killen, Faith
Subject:	Headcount File

Please review this headcount file, and verify that this is an accurate list of current ENA employees as of today 12/14/01.  Please send changes by 12:00 noon on Monday, 12/17/01 to Elaine Schield.

Thanks for your cooperation,
Sarah Brown

 << File: Total Headcount.xls >>


Kevin, please review attached and sign back. Vector will be purchasing
70,000 MMbtu for gas Nov. 15, 2000.
(See attached file: Line Pack Gas Purchase Agreement Enron.doc)

Keith Irani
Manager, Marketing Services
Vector Pipeline
416 495-5960
keith.irani@cgc.enbridge.com
 - Line Pack Gas Purchase Agreement Enron.doc


We have purchased LV Cogen for tomorrow.  We have 7 mws for HE 6-10, and 52
mws for 11-16, then 7 mws again for 17-24.  We have bought this at Mead 230
(no need to buy transmission) in NEVP's control area from ST-West Services at
$150.  We will be long in position manager.  Stan Cocke will provide deal #'s
and oasis #'s from NEVP transmission for the tags.  We have seen SP-15 run up
substantially the last few days in the afternoon, and today SP-15 has been
trading as high as $250.  Please call me with any questions.
Thanks,
Bill


God help us.


_________________________________________________________________

WEEKEND SYSTEMS AVAILABILITY

FOR

1/4/2002 5:00:00 PM through 1/7/2002 12:00:00 AM
_________________________________________________________________
SCHEDULED SYSTEM OUTAGES:

ARDMORE DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS:

Impact: Corp
Time: Sat 1/5/2002 2:00:00 PM CT thru Sat 1/5/2002 3:00:00 PM CT
Sat 1/5/2002 12:00:00 PM PT thru Sat 1/5/2002 1:00:00 PM PT
Sat 1/5/2002 8:00:00 PM London thru Sat 1/5/2002 9:00:00 PM London
Outage: SysAdmiral Fault Tolerance Split for Netco/Estate
Environments Impacted: The outage the sysAdmiral Application will be brief and should not directly affect any applications.
Purpose: We are Splitting the sysAdmiral Fault Tolerance Databases and Master Services on NAHOU-BPMS01P and NAHOU-BPMSFT01P. NAHOU-BPMS01P Database/Master will be used for Estate Scheduling needs and NAHOU-BPMSFT01P will be used for Netco Scheduling Needs. After the environments are split their will be no more replication between the two servers or Fault Tolerance.
Backout: ReEnable Fault Tolernace.
Contact(s): Brennan, Ryan 713-853-4545
Lindsay, Brian 713-853-6225
Impact: Corp
Time: Sat 1/5/2002 9:00:00 AM CT thru Sat 1/5/2002 9:30:00 AM CT
Sat 1/5/2002 7:00:00 AM PT thru Sat 1/5/2002 7:30:00 AM PT
Sat 1/5/2002 3:00:00 PM London thru Sat 1/5/2002 3:30:00 PM London
Outage: Hardware swap for DFS NAHOU
Environments Impacted: All
Purpose: Existing DFS cluster NAHOU hardware has been marked for Netco Deployment. Therefore it is necessary to de-commission NAHOU and bring up another instance of NAHOU dfs for estate.
Backout: Revert DFS cluster back to NAHOU.
Contact(s): Cheng, John 7138531672
McNair, Darren 7138537955

AZURIX: No Scheduled Outages.

EB34 DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

EDI:  No Scheduled Outages

EES: No Scheduled Outages

ENRON CENTER SOUTH DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages

ENRON NORTH AMERICAN LANS:  No Scheduled Outages

FIELD SERVICES:  No Scheduled Outages.

INTERNET: No Scheduled Outages.

MESSAGING: No Scheduled Outages.

MARKET DATA: No Scheduled Outages.

NT: No Scheduled Outages.

OS/2:  No Scheduled Outages.

OTHER SYSTEMS: No Scheduled Outages.

SITARA:  No Scheduled Outages.

SUN/OSS SYSTEM: No Scheduled Outages.

TELEPHONY: No Scheduled Outages

TERMINAL SERVER:  No Scheduled Outages.

UNIFY:  No Scheduled Outages.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
								FOR ASSISTANCE

(713) 853-1411   Enron Resolution Center

Specific Help:
Information Risk Management			(713) 853-5536
SAP/ISC                                                                               (713) 345-4727
Unify On-Call 					(713) 284-3757  [Pager]
Sitara On-Call					(713) 288-0101  [Pager]
RUS/GOPS/GeoTools/APRS			(713) 639-9726  [Pager]
OSS/UA4/TARP				(713) 285-3165  [Pager]
CPR						(713) 284-4175  [Pager]
EDI Support 					(713) 327-3893  [Pager]
EES Help Desk					(713)853-9797 OR (888)853-9797
TDS -Trader Decision Support On-Call                    (713) 327-6032 [Pager]


thanks for hanging out with me last night.
b.


The request has been completed with all resources requested either completed
or rejected. You can view the details of the  request by clicking
http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000014988&Page=
MyReq.


John, I wanted to thank you for taking the time to discuss with me the
opportunity available in the Real Time Group.  Based on our discussion and
after further consideration I feel that it would be an excellent fit for both
the Real Time Group and myself. With my prior and current work experience and
knowledge of the enpower system,    I am confident that I will be a valuable
asset to your team.  I look forward to the opportunity and eagerly await your
positive response.  Please feel free to contact me with any questions or
concerns you may have.  Once again thank you for the opportunity.


Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions.

Thanks,
Jennifer


<<YPO 2001.jpg>>  <<YPO COUPLE RETREAT REGISTRATION FORM.doc>>

REMINDER!!!

THE DEADLINE FOR SIGNING UP FOR THE

ROCKIN' IN THE ROCKIES  COUPLES RETREAT

IS MAY 15TH.

WE ARE FILLING UP QUICKLY.

 - YPO 2001.jpg
 - YPO COUPLE RETREAT REGISTRATION FORM.doc


John, I am pleased to report that West Gas Orig has completed the permanent assignment of approx 47,000 MMBtu/day of El Paso Transport to Public Service of New Mexico. This capacity was assigned with varying start dates. late 02 and early 03, with no credit risk associated with this transaction as a condition of the assignment was an unconditional release of ENA.  ENA assigned this capacity at max rate ( which meets all FERC policy issues)and we were able to generate $3.0 MM of incremental value which was granted to Stephanie Miller from Mike Grigsby.

In addition to the MTM of approx $ 3MM, this transaction reinforces the good working relationship between trading and marketing and may enhance ENA's trading position by removing some of the risks associated with this pipe. These risks include, flow rate risk, demand charge tariff changes, receipt point pool allocation risks, and potential MTM erosion and of course FERC/regulatory pressures.

Our work is nowhere near complete on this as we continue to create structures and discussion around the 200,000/day which is a little more complicated to shed. In the meantime our group continues to promote the placement of the remaining capacity either through other producers or generators and we anticipate the assignment of another  small package early next week.

Thanks to those who helped out in this effort, including legal, regulatory, risk, structuring, trading and my origination team !!!

regards, BT


Enron in Action can be accessed through the new Community Relations web site at http://cr.enron.com/eia.html .  In this week's issue you will find out information regarding:

Enron Happenings
BEAR Holiday Fundraiser
2001 Holiday Shopping Card benefiting the American Cancer Society
Enron Kids 2001 Holiday Program
Support the Museum of Natural Science at the Crate & Barrel Opening Night Preview Party
Enron Night with the Houston Aeros
Free Carwashes for Enron Employees
American Heart Association "Heart Walk"

Enron Volunteer Opportunities
Volunteer for the 2001 Nutcracker Market "A World of Holiday Shopping"

Enron Wellness
CPR/First Aid Training
Mammogram Screening
November is Lung Cancer Awareness Month

Involved Employees
Par "Fore" Pets Golf Tournament

In addition, Enron in Action is available through a channel on my.home.enron.com.  To add this channel to your set-up click on the channels link at the top of the screen and under announcements check the Enron in Action box.

If you wish to add an announcement to Enron in Action, please fill out the attached form below and submit it to mailto:eia@enron.com no later than 12 PM Thursday each week.


ocean view


I recently requested access to CQG.  Could you please tell me how the process
is moving along and when I will be able to access it.

Thank you,

Errol McLaughlin
X5-8274


As you are aware, Enron utilizes temporary staffing services to satisfy
staffing requirements throughout the company.  For the past several months, a
project team, representing Enron,s temporary staffing users, have researched
and evaluated alternative Managed Services programs to determine which source
would best meet our current and future needs in terms of quality, performance
and cost containment objectives.  The Business Unit Implementation Project
Team members are:

Laurie Koenig, Operations Management, EES
Carolyn Vigne, Administration, EE&CC
Linda Martin, Accounting & Accounts Payable, Corporate
Beverly Stephens, Administration, ENA
Norma Hasenjager, Human Resources, ET&S
Peggy McCurley, Administration, Networks
Jane Ellen Weaver, Enron Broadband Services
Paulette Obrecht, Legal, Corporate
George Weber, GSS

In addition, Eric Merten (EBS), Kathy Cook (EE&CC), Carolyn Gilley (ENA),
Larry Dallman (Corp/AP), and Diane Eckels (GSS) were active members of the
Selection Project Team.

As a result of the team,s efforts, we are pleased to announce the beginning
of a strategic alliance with CORESTAFF,s Managed Services Group.  This group
will function as a vendor-neutral management entity overseeing all staffing
vendors in the program scope. They will also provide a web based online
technology tool that will enhance the ordering and reporting capabilities.
The goal of our alliance with CORESTAFF is to make obtaining a temporary
worker with the right skills and experience easier while protecting the best
interests of the organization.

We plan to implement Phase I of this improvement effective January 2, 2001.
This Phase I of the implementation will encompass administrative/clerical
temporary workers at the Houston locations only. If you currently have
administrative/clerical temporary workers in your department, the enhancement
will not affect their position. In an effort to preserve relationships, all
current staffing vendors will be invited to participate in this enhanced
program.  CORESTAFF shares our commitment to minimize any disruptions in
service during this transition.

We expect to incorporate the administrative/clerical workers in Omaha,
Seattle and Portland in Phase II, which is scheduled for February, 2001.  The
scope and timing of any additional phases will be determined after these two
phases have been completed.

Realizing the impact that the temporary workforce has in business today, we
selected CORESTAFF,s Managed Services Group based on their exceptional
management team, commitment to quality service, and creative solutions to our
staffing needs.  The relationship promises to offer Enron a cost effective
and simple means for obtaining temporary employees.

In the coming weeks, Enron and CORESTAFF,s Managed Services Group will be
communicating to Enron,s administrative/clerical temporary staffing vendors
about the new process.

There are many benefits to this new Managed Services program, which are
outlined on the attached page.  More details on how to utilize CORESTAFF,s
Managed Services program will be announced soon and meetings will be
scheduled to demonstrate the reporting system and to meet the Managed
Services team.

What is Managed Services?

CORESTAFF,s Managed Services program includes:

? Vendor-neutral management model
? Equal distribution of staffing orders to all staffing partners
? Web-based application with online ordering, data capture and customized
reporting
? Benchmarking and performance measurement for continuous improvement
? Methodologies for accurate skill-matching and fulfillment efficiencies

Key Benefits

? More vendors working on each order from the outset ) faster access to
available talent pools
? Standardized mark-ups and fees to manage costs more effectively
? Online access to requisition status for users
? Robust databases offering managers enhanced tracking and reporting of
temporary usage and expenditures
? Standard and customized reporting capabilities -- online
? Tenured, experienced Managed Services team on-site to assist users in
accessing web site, identifying usage trends, preparing specialized reports,
etc.

Corestaff/Managed Services/Staffing

Joseph Marsh ) Lead / Operations (josephm@corestaff.com; 713-438-1400)
Amy Binney, Sharon B. Sellers ) Operations
Cherri Carbonara ) Marketing / Communications
Cynthia Duhon )Staffing Partner management


The report named: CE P/L <http://trv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=4&report_name=CE+P/L&category_cd=3&category_name=CENTRAL&toc_hide=1&sTV1=3&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=10/31/2001>, published as of 10/31/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


This request has been pending your approval for  59 days.  Please click http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000057285&Page=Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000057285
Request Create Date : 8/30/01 5:59:30 PM
Requested For       : erik.simpson@enron.com
Resource Name       : Market Data Kobra NatGas
Resource Type       : Applications


Here is the draft procedures that I sent you back in September.  It does not
incorporate the changes that you sent
us a few days latter.  I will forward a copy of that memo also.  We are
looking forward to getting with you to discuss the
procedures and timing.

Ruth
---------------------- Forwarded by Ruth Concannon/HOU/ECT on 11/28/2000
06:25 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Ruth Concannon                           09/28/2000 11:38 AM

To: mrosenberg@sithe.com, joliver@sithe.com, bhughes@sithe.com,
bfernandez@sithe.com, lmessina@sithe.com, slee@sithe.com, jmaher@sithe.com,
bscherfling@sithe.com, mgrady@sithe.com
cc: Jeff Donahue/HOU/ECT@ECT, Todd Busby/NA/Enron@Enron (bcc: Ruth
Concannon/HOU/ECT)
Subject: Procedures for Incremental Empire Gas for On-Peak Day Ahead Market

Marty suggested that I get these discussions kicked off on your side while he
was
out-of-town today.  Basically, I started off with your proposed procedures
and made
a few changes that Enron needs to make sure that right amount of gas shows up
at the
correct time.

Also, we are suggesting a confirmation form be sent back and forth between
Enron and
Sithe every day.  This will help document all the small little details and
costs so that we
both drop anything through the cracks.  I am suggesting that we e-mail this
confirm form
to the right folks in both our companies, so that no one is left out of the
loop.

You will also notice our attempt to make sure that everyone has a clear
understanding
of exactly what is included in the numbers that are reported to Enron's
traders.  The timing
of your calls will be when everyone is very busy in our trading group.  There
will not be much
time to have long conversations, but it is very important that everyone have
the same
understanding what the numbers mean.

Please take a look at this on your side and see if there are some other
things that need to
be included.

Thanks,

Ruth


I agree.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Corman, Shelley
Sent:	Thursday, February 14, 2002 4:21 PM
To:	Horton, Stanley; Hayslett, Rod
Cc:	Daily, Pamela; Blair, Lynn
Subject:	Need Your Approval for Telephone Moves

Stan/Rod,

I previously mentioned to you that I have assigned John Buchanan as Mgr, TW scheduling to ensure that we have a consistent focus on TW scheduling matters and presence at the 8 AM TW morning meeting (Lynn Blair, Steve January and Terry Kowalke are in the NNG morning meeting each day at the same time).

Previously Terry Kowalke and John Buchanan split time advising the TW and NNG team on day to day scheduling matters.  Terry was sitting on 39 and John on 42.  In light of the immediate change in their assignments, I asked John and Terry to switch desks.  I need you authorization to move their telephones.

This change is important to demonstrate to the commercial groups of both NNG and TW that we will not miss a step in tending to daily business even during the transition.

Thank you for the support.


Do not update links when opening this file.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Laura Levy
EnronOnline
x53551


I am pleased to announce that Tim Johanson has accepted a position as Account
Manager for the Minneapolis LDC team and will be relocating to Minneapolis.

Tim brings many years of experience to this position having worked on both
the gas and power side of the business for NSP.  He is currently working in
the power/gas development group in Omaha for John Dushinske.  Tim will
continue with some of these responsibilities in his new role in Minnesota.

Tim received his B.S. in Mechanical Engineering/ Business Administration from
the University of Kansas and his MBA in management from the University of St.
Thomas in St. Paul, MN.

 Please congratulate Tim on his new assignments and relocation to Minnesota.


-----Original Message-----
From: David Gensch [mailto:dag@cact.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 4:28 PM
To: undisclosed-recipients
Subject: ng0425

CACT NG sheets for Thursday


Stinson/Vince,

Some news articles.  Do read the first one, and the second last one.

Regards,
Sandeep.
---------------------- Forwarded by Sandeep Kohli/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
05/07/2001 09:10 AM ---------------------------

Nikita Varma
05/07/2001 07:42 AM
To: Nikita Varma/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:  (bcc: Sandeep Kohli/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT)

Subject: From The Enron India Newsdesk - May 5-7 newsclips

THE ECONOMIC TIMES, MAY 7, 2001
http://www.economictimes.com/today/bn04.htm
Enron CEO casts vote to save DPC, Tina Edwin & Soma Banerjee
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------
THE ECONOMIC TIMES, MAY 7, 2001
http://www.economictimes.com/today/07econ10.htm
Maha sore over delay in naming Godbole  nominee
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------
THE TIMES OF INDIA, 7 May, 2001
http://www.timesofindia.com/today/07busi3.htm
Maharashtra 'unhappy' with delay in naming Godbole nominee
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------
BUSINESS STANDARD, Monday, 7 May 2001
http://www.business-standard.com/archives/2001/may/50050501.015.asp
Reliance allowed to hawk power from Patalganga to third parties
Arijit De, S Ravindran & Renni Abraham in Mumbai
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------
THE ECONOMIC TIMES, MAY 7, 2001
http://www.economictimes.com/today/07econ11.htm
No need of Patalganga, Bhadravati power: MSEB

Also appeared in the following newspaper:
THE TIMES OF INDIA, MAY 7, 2001
'No need of Patalganga, Bhadravati power'
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------
BUSINESS STANDARD, MAY 7, 2001
http://www.business-standard.com/today/finance9.asp?Menu=5
Global bankers ask govt to honour DPC  obligations
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------
BUSINESS STANDARD
Saturday, 5 May, 2001,
http://www.business-standard.com/archives/2001/may/50050501.017.asp
GE may pull out as DPC supplier , S Ravindran in Mumbai
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------
HINDU BUSINESSLINE, May 5, 2001
Agenda for fresh talks with Enron chalked out
 http://www.indiaserver.com/businessline/2001/05/06/stories/14065607.htm
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------
THE ECONOMIC TIMES, May 6, 2001
http://216.34.146.167:8000/servlet/Form
Godbole panel meets sans Dabhol representation
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------
THE ECONOMIC TIMES, May 5, 2001
http://216.34.146.167:8000/servlet/Form
NTPC not to buy power from Enron: Govt
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------
THE TIMES OF INDIA, May 7, 2001
http://www.timesofindia.com/today/07busi11.htm
MSEB recovers Rs 3.06 cr arrears in one day
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------
THE ECONOMIC TIMES, MAY 7, 2001
Enron CEO casts vote to save DPC, Tina Edwin & Soma Banerjee

AMUL'S creative directors may have gone back to ad-libbing 'Enron or
Enr-off', but for the big kahuna at the American utility, Dabhol is still a
worthwhile project. While the entire Enron board had almost decided to call
it quits and proceed with the termination of the $2.9-billion  power project
at Dabhol, the veto exercised by the  company chairman Kenneth Lay has saved
the project *- at least for the timebeing. Sources said the meeting held on
Tuesday at the energy major's headquarters in Houston could have sounded the
death knell for the only big foreign investment in the Indian power sector.

Although the future of the project is still pretty uncertain with the lenders
unwilling to continue disbursements unless payment obligations are not
honoured and contractual obligations left unfulfilled, the veto exercised at
this juncture by the chairman of the parent company has come as a big boost
to the Indian venture. Company sources said: "We do not know what went on
there but it is true that as of now we are not pulling out."  With the
engineering procurement and construction contractors GE and equipment
suppliers Bechtel too in a  cautious mode mode, DPC was finding it even more
difficult to continue the construction of the project as per the schedules.
Sources said the stand taken by the rest of the directors on the board would
be in view of the backlash that the company would have to face from its
shareholders if the  project actually flopped.Enron had similar bitter
experiences in Pakistan and it was difficult for the parent company to then
justify such investments to the shareholders.

Enron, which had planned a major investments in India's infrastructure
sectors such as oil and gas, LNG, gas transportation, telecom and broadband
network, has already pulled out most of their personnel from some of these
operations. The company's MoUs with various other majors like Indian Oil
Corporation, too, is in a limbo and the US major's stake in the oil and gas
venture is up for grabs. However, even though Lay is still hoping to find a
solution  to the controversy back home, both DPC and MSEB are still to get
down to negotiations.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------
THE ECONOMIC TIMES, MAY 7, 2001
Maha sore over delay in naming Godbole  nominee

THE MAHARASHTRA government has expressed 'unhappiness' over the Centre's
delay in appointing its nominee on the nine-member Godbole Committee to
renegotiate the power purchase agreement signed between  Enron-promoted
Dabhol Power Company and state   electricity board. "The committee, which is
to hold discussions with Enron  officials from Houston on May 11, has only a
month's time  for renegotiations and with DPC's termination notice threat
hanging on our head, time is actually running out. Yet  there is no official
to represent the Union government," said  a senior state government official.
"There are media reports that the solicitor-general Harish  Salve would be
appointed, but we are yet to hear anything   from their side," he said.

The official said the state expected Centre to announce its  representative
before May 11, as it would appreciate his  crucial presence in the first
session of discussions with  Enron officials, lenders and gas suppliers.
Sources in the mantralaya added the government had also   been unhappy over
the Centre's "rigid stand" on not allowing State-owned National Thermal Power
Corporation   to buy the excess capacity of DPC's total 2,184-mw  project.
"Let NTPC and Power Trading Corporation of India come together and sell DPC's
surlpus power. We have already mooted this suggestion, but a favourable reply
is yet to  come from the union power ministry," the official said.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------
THE TIMES OF INDIA, 7 May, 2001
Maharashtra 'unhappy' with delay in naming Godbole nominee

 The Maharashtra government has expressed 'unhappiness' over the Centre's
delay in appointing its   nominee on the nine-member Godbole committee to
renegotiate the power purchase agreement (PPA) signed between Enron promoted
Dabhol Power Company  (DPC) and the Maharashtra State Electricity Board
(MSEB). "The committee, which is to hold discussions with Enron officials
from Houston on May 11, has only a month's  time for renegotiations and with
DPC's termination notice threat hanging on our head, time is actually running
out. Yet there is no official to represent the Union government," a senior
state government official said here on Sunday. "There are media reports that
solicitor general Harish   Salve would be appointed, but we are yet to hear
anything from their side," he said.

The official said that the state expected the Centre to announce their
representative before May 11, as it would appreciate his crucial presence in
the first session of discussions with Enron officials, lenders and gas
suppliers. Sources in the Mantralaya added that the government had also been
unhappy over the Centre's rigid stand on  not allowing state-owned National
Thermal Power Corporation (NTPC) to buy the excess capacity of DPC's total
2,184 mw project. "Let NTPC and Power Trading Corporation of India (PTC) come
together and sell DPC's surlpus power. We have already mooted this
suggestion, but a favourable reply is yet to come from the Union power
ministry," the official said. The official said that the Centre, which was
also responsible for DPC project as it has provided counter guarantee to
Enron India, should form a special purpose  vehicle for sale of the excess
power to other states. The state government's reaction comes in wake of Union
power minister Suresh Prabhu's discussion with Chief Minister Vilasrao
Deshmukh in Delhi few days ago. It was learnt that Prabhu told Deshmukh
"there is no question of NTPC buying power from the project since long term
PPAs have been signed by NTPC with the buying states".

Deshmukh had suggested that the Central power utility should sell excess
power over and above the 300-400 mw needed for the state from the DPC's 740
mw  phase-I and soon to be commissioned phase-II of 1,444  mw, to other needy
states. Considering the high cost of power generated from DPC,   which during
the recent months has hovered around Rs 7 per unit as against an average cost
of Rs 2.30-2.80 a unit  from Central and state utilities, there would be few
takers for the power from Dabhol, the power minister  reportedly said.
"Deficit states will buy DPC power only when the cost of  power is brought
down," he said, adding power ministry  would facilitate wheelng of this power
to the buyers.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------
BUSINESS STANDARD, Monday, 7 May 2001
Reliance allowed to hawk power from Patalganga to third parties
Arijit De, S Ravindran & Renni Abraham in Mumbai

 In an unusual departure from normal practice, the Maharashtra government has
allowed the Reliance  group to sell power generated by its 447-mw  Patalganga
power project directly to third parties if   the Maharashtra State
Electricity Board (MSEB)  does not lift power. The project,s power purchase
agreement (PPA) has a clause to this effect.  The state government,s
permission to Reliance to  hawk power to third parties has to be seen in the
context of its dithering on forwarding to the Centre  the Dabhol Power
Company,s bid for mega power  status so that it could sell power to third
parties.

 DPC sources told Business Standard several weeks ago that the company,s
application had been pending with the Chief Minister,s office for months.
Only now has the state government authorised the Godbole committee to
negotiate with DPC on third  party sales outside the state. The DPC project
is facing the threat of closure  following MSEB,s inability to buy power from
it,  thanks to the Board,s weak financial position.  Not only can the
Reliance group sell power to third parties within Maharashtra, but it can
sell power to utilities outside the state. The PPA does not  expressly bar it
from doing so. Nor does it specify the category of customers to whom power
can be sold. So, in effect, this suggests that the group could sell power to
industrial and commercial customers in  Maharashtra and emerge as a rival to
the MSEB.The state electricity board derives over 80 per cent  of its revenue
from such consumers.

 Apart from captive power plants, independent power producers in India are
allowed to sell power only to  state electricity boards. They can sell power
outside the state only if they qualify for mega power project status.  With
its 447-mw capacity, the Patalganga project is not eligible for such status
because mega power  rojects are supposed to have a minimum capacity  of 1,000
mw. Speaking on the sidelines of a press conference  last week, Reliance
Industries managing director  Anil Ambani told Business Standard: A provision
in third parties. Ambani was answering a question on whether the MSEB,s weak
financials and inability to offer escrow cover to the project as emphasised
in the Godbole committee report set up to defuse the Dabhol crisis would
derail the Patalganga project.

The PPA does not have any express restriction as to third party sale outside
the state, a Reliance spokesperson confirmed on Friday in a faxed  response
to questions.  A senior MSEB official explained that the state government
cleared private power projects some years ago on the basis of the
unrealistically high demand projections contained in a report by a former
MSEB official.  Subsequently, it was realised that the state would be stuck
with excess power. So the Reliance group was permitted to sell power to third
parties, he said. The Patalganga project along with the Ispat group,s 1,082
mw Bhadravati project has been put on hold till the Godbole committee submits
its second
report.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------
THE ECONOMIC TIMES, MAY 7, 2001
No need of Patalganga, Bhadravati power: MSEB

THE AXE seems to have finally fallen on the much-delayed Reliance
Industries-promoted Patalganga and Ispat Industries' Bhadravati Power
projects in Maharashtra as  the state electricity board has firmly told the
government  that "there is no need of these projects nor their power". The
loss-making board has communicated to the government that MSEB had "no
interest" in Patalganga and Bhadravati, as it did not have escrow-able
capacity and also that industrial demand for power had slowed down
tremendously in Maharashtra, state government sources  said here on Sunday.
"In last November itself, MSEB had sent an official intimation to the state
government informing its decision in  favour of cancellation of the two
projects on several grounds -- including they being unviable and
unaffordable," sources said. "Reliance's project is no different from that of
DPC's. Patalganga is also naphtha-based and its PPA is on similar lines...

After the Enron experience, MSEB cannot  even dream of another gas-based
power plant in the state," a senior MSEB official said. He said MSEB has
already asked the state government  not to provide escrow to both the 447-mw
Patalganga and  the 1,084-mw coal-based Bhadravati, "as the US energy major
has almost squeezed us of all over finances". When contacted, MSEB chairman
Vinay Bansal said: "Reliance and Ispat projects have been put on hold as per
the Godbole Committee's recommendations", but  expressed inability to give
further details.

Currently, Bhadravati and Patalganga projects have been  put on hold as per
Godbole Committee report, which was set up to review the DPC-MSEB PPA and
energy scenario in Maharashtra. "Can you go ahead with the project without an
escrow cover?" the committee was believed to have asked Ispat  and Reliance
representatives, to which the reply had been  negative, sources added.
Sources said, as of now, both the projects have not been able to achieve
financial closure as leading financial   institutions were not willing to
fund the projects which do  not have a "guaranteed payment" mechanism from
MSEB, which, incidentally it has promised to DPC. "All the three were cleared
as 'fast-track' projects, but other than Enron, Reliance and Ispat have been
caught in a quagmire, especially Bhadravati, which has been hanging afire
since last nine years," they added.

Moreover, the MSEB official opined that given the current situation, if DPC
calls it quits from India, Bhadravati was a safer bet than Reliance's
Patalganga. Patalganga's power would be mere 50 paise less than that of DPC's
that ranges anywhere around approximately Rs  4.50 per unit to as high as Rs
7, while Bhadravati's cost could be around Rs 3.80 to Rs 4 per unit, he
informed. MSEB's installed capacity ended on March 31, 2001, was14,000 mw and
it has generated 45,000 million units with transmission and distribution
losses as high as 39 per cent. (PTI)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------
BUSINESS STANDARD, MAY 7, 2001
Global bankers ask govt to honour DPC  obligations

Tamal Bandyopadhyay, Surajeet Dasgupta& Santosh Tiwary in Mumbai/NewDelhi
Global arrangers for the Dabhol Power Company have mounted fresh pressure on
the  finance ministry to honour the Union  government,s counter-guarantee and
have also  set strict conditions for reconsidering the termination of the
power purchase agreement (PPA) between the DPC and the Maharashtra State
Electricity Board (MSEB). In a related development, the DPC has sent a  note
to all lenders saying they would have to bear   the consequences of the turn
of events as they  have prevented the DPC from serving the PPA  termination
notice last month.

The lenders. in their turn, sent a statement --  prepared by the New
York-based legal firm  White & Case -- defending their stance saying they are
working in the best interest of the  project. The lenders are expected to
meet in London over the next fortnight to take stock of the situation.The
deadline for resolving the issues are drawing to a close as 10 days of the
three-week reprieve  have passed. At the DPC board meeting in London on May
25, the lenders had managed to stall the issuance    of the termination
notice and got three weeks, time for themselves to convince the Centre as
well as the Maharashtra government to resolve  the impasse on the
controversial project. In a letter to finance secretary Ajit Kumar dated
April 30, the global arrangers said the  government must own up its
responsibility and  meet its obligations without further delay. Among the
stiff conditions, set by the arrangers, are the demand that the central
government  ensure payment of all the pending bills of MSEB  for December
2000, January 2001, February  2001 and March 2001 which remain unpaid
without any protest or reservation by May 7  (Monday).

Any payment previously made under &protest8 should be made free and clear of
such protest or  any other reservation, and the Center should   ensure timely
payment of future bills by MSEB,  they said. Meanwhile, sources said that the
finance secretary was expected to meet the international lenders to the
Dabhol projects in London stand on the issue. The lenders, list of demands
also include asking  MSEB to take steps required under the existing
contracts to activate the escrow arrangements  put in place at the time of
financial close of Phase II of the Project by May 7.

They have demanded that the Union government and the Maharashtra government
should take all required actions to ensure that no government agency will
take any step to impede the operation   of Phase I or the construction and
operation of  Phase II without due cause. The lenders have also asked them to
ensure that the relevant customs authorities permit import of all goods and
equipment required for the Project  by May 21. CSFB, ANZ Export Finance,
Citi, Bank Of America and ABN Amro are the global arrangers for both phase I
as well as phase II of  the project.

The State Bank of India, which is also a global arranger for phase II, did
not sign the letter. "Ten days have passed since the lenders bought three
weeks time from the company delaying its declaration of the termination of
the PPA. Since then, nothing has moved at the material level barring MSEB's
payment of the January bill to the tune of Rs 134 crore under protest," said
a  source among the global arrangers. come forward to meet its obligations
The lenders  are planning to meet around mid-May in London  and this time
they will be left with no choice but to give the go-ahead to the company to
terminate the PPA unless the finance ministry comes forward to settle the
issue, the source added. The lenders are, however, not ready to take the
blame for any delay in the termination of PPA as implied by the company. The
White & Case statement said the lenders are  concerned about the fate of the
project and they  are exploring all intermediate steps before  choosing the
last option -- termination of PPA.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------
BUSINESS STANDARD, Saturday, 5 May, 2001
GE may pull out as DPC supplier , S Ravindran in Mumbai

After US-based Bechtel, it is now the turn of General Electric to review its
participation as equipment supplier to the controversial 2,184-mw power
project in Maharashtra, being set up by the Dabhol Power Company.Bechtel is
the EPC contractor to the project while GE has supplied the equipment,
primarily turbines.General Electric, like Bechtel, also holds 10 per cent in
Dabhol Power Company (DPC). And both Bechtel and General Electric are worried
about future payments from DPC. Sources familiar with the project said that
so far DPC has not defaulted in its payments to General Electric. What is
worrying General Electric is the possible scenario after June 7, when about
700 mw power will be commissioned after the second phase  trial runs.

DPC and the Maharashtra State Electricity Board  (MSEB) have been locked in a
payments dispute for months. If MSEB continues with its stance, DPC in turn
may not be able to pay General Electric. In such a situation, GE may walk out
of the project. A final decision will be taken only in June, said sources.
General Electric did not respond to a faxed questionnaire sent by Business
Standard. Senior executives at its public relations agency Burson
Marsteller Roger Pereira said that only DPC executives were authorised to
speak on the issue. The DPC spokesman declined to comment on the issue.

The first phase of the 740 mw has already been commissioned. After the second
phase of 1,444 mwis commissioned by December, 2001, MSEB will  have to pay
DPC a minimum of Rs 500 crore per month. The escrow account for this was to
have been made operational by April 7, 2001. MSEB has refused to do this.
Earlier, DPC had invoked the political force majeure clause in its contract
with the board. MSEB is now arguing that the invocation of this clause has
absolved DPC of all its liabilities.

Consequently, it will not operationalise the escrow account. This casts a
further shadow over DPC,s ability to pay General Electric and Bechtel. This
is worrying the lenders to the project as well. The situation has taken a
turn for the worse with DPC practically refusing to re-negotiate the contract
for the second phase with the Godbole panel constituted by the Maharashtra
government.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------
HINDU BUSINESSLINE, May 5, 2001
Agenda for fresh talks with Enron chalked out

OFFICIALS of the State Government, Maharashtra State Electricity Board (MSEB)
and members of the Madhav Godbole committee, which recently submitted its
review on the Dabhol Power project, met here on Saturday. The meeting was to
``chart the agenda for renegotiation with Enron officials,'' a senior MSEB
official said. Enron officials were scheduled to attend this meeting but
backed out on May 3. Enron had informed the State Government that it would
not accept the                      recommendations of the Godbole committee.
`It is understandable that the company does not find the recommendations
acceptable. But the report is not bound to personal opinions,'' the official
said. The next meeting to decide the direction of renegotiation process with
Enron is  scheduled on May 11.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------
THE ECONOMIC TIMES, May 6, 2001
Godbole panel meets sans Dabhol representation

THE GODBOLE Committee, set up for renegotiating the estranged power purchase
agreement between US energy major Enron-promoted Dabhol Power Company and the
state electricity board on Saturday held its first internal meeting sans
representatives of the multinational. "It was an internal meeting to take
stock of the current situation and decide on matter pertaining to the May 11
meet with officials of Enron, GE, Bechtel and DPC's foreign lenders," said
state government sources. The meeting, which lasted for almost four hours,
discussed a strategy to present the committee's recommendations made public
last month, they said.

Of the nine members of the committee, Saturday's meeting was attended by five
members -- including Godbole, MSEB chairman Vinay Bansal, state energy
secretary V M Lal, state finance secretary Sudhir Shrivastava and Kirit
Parekh of Indira Gandhi Institute of Developmental Research. Those absent
were HDFC chairman Deepak Parekh, Teri director R K Pachauri, former union
energy secretary EAS Sarma and yet-to-be-appointed representatives of the
Centre and Central Electricity Authority. The negotiating committee would
suggest solutions to bring down the exorbitant power tariff, separating of
the liquefied natural gas facility, restructuring of DPC and allowing sale of
excess power through central utilities mainly the National Thermal Power
Corporation, said sources. (PTI
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------
THE ECONOMIC TIMES, May 5, 2001
NTPC not to buy power from Enron: Govt

THE CENTRE has ruled out the possibility of National Thermal Power
Corporation buying power generated by US energy giant Enron-promoted Dabhol
Power Company. Union power minister Suresh Prabhu is learnt to have stated
this during the meeting with Maharashtra chief minister Vilasrao Deshmukh
last month, convened by the finance minister Yashwant Sinha to discuss the
Enron crisis, said government sources on Friday.

Prabhu had pointed out that "there is no question of NTPC buying power from
the project since long-term power purchase agreements have been signed by
NTPC with the buying states". Maharashtra chief minister Vilasrao Deshmukh
during the meeting suggested that the central power utility sell the excess
power over and above the 300-400 mw needed for the state from the 740 mw
phase-I and soon-to-be-commissioned phase-II of 1,444-mw, to other needy
states. When contacted, Prabhu said the entire controversy over payment
default by Maharashtra State Electricity Board owing to high cost of power
generated by DPC had to be resolved between the state government, and DPC and
Centre had very limited role to play. DPC has already slapped one
conciliation notice on the Centre and three arbitration notices on the state
government over non-payment of dues amounting to Rs 213-crore-plus interest
rate towards bills due for the months of December 2000 and January 2001. (PTI)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------
THE TIMES OF INDIA, May 7, 2001
MSEB recovers Rs 3.06 cr arrears in one day

In a special day-long drive, Nagpur rural zone of Maharashtra State
Electricity Board (MSEB) has recovered Rs 3.06 crore as arrears from the
defaulters who had to pay a handsome dividend, and disconnected15,000
connections of erring customers last week. According to MSEB sources, under
the drive, initiated by chief engineer Manohar Bapat, with the assistance of
about 5,000 employees including engineers, accounts staff and linesmen, a
door-to-door campaign was launched to meet 25,000 customers, leading to the
recovery of the dues. Power supply to 15,000 customers were disconnected on
the spot due to non-payment of arrears in Chandrapur, Gadchiroli, Wardha,
Bhandara, Gondia and Nagpur districts, it said in a release. The drive met
with stiff resistence from public and the police were called in at many
places to assist the powermen, it added.


----- Forwarded by Rob Walls/NA/Enron on 12/08/2000 08:03 AM -----

	Bruce Lundstrom@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	Sent by: Wendi Hoelscher@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	12/07/2000 01:28 PM

		 To: Rob Walls/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re:

Rob:

I'm having trouble accessing my email but here is the latest.  There are more
newspaper articles which make me believe that GOM's position is hardening on
reviewing the project.  I met with two of our outside lawyers today.  Atul
recommended that we review the possibility of a challenge based on
unconscionability or void as against public policy.

The lawyers are universally pretty pessimistic regarding the possibility of a
satisfactory outcome for Enron.

I'm meeting with the rest of our India lawyers tomorrow, including Robert
Mathis.

Bruce

From: Rob Walls@ENRON on 12/06/2000 12:19 PM
To: Bruce Lundstrom/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject:

update?


Kay,
          I agree with your comments on the selection of the ALJ.   The
following is our response to your two questions :              Ryan and I
believe that we can set forth a number of differences between the two cases
such as the site -specific air quality impact analysis required under the
applicable regulations;  the differences in parties to the proceedings; the
different impacts to the various petitioning local governments depending
upon their distance from the facility in question; the different phases of
discovery that the cases are presently in, and the like.  Nevertheless, the
foregoing may not be sufficient grounds to preclude the consolidation based
upon a minimal delay in the proceedings, as we understand that DEP is
proposing.
         More importantly, we previously expressed our concern with the
company's current position in the Deerfield proceeding relative to the
proposed Nox limitation of 36 ppm. Because DEP has not been persuaded to
date to increase the permit limitation to 42 ppm and because Enron did not
legally oppose such a condition in the Deerfield permit, then Enron's
ability to raise such an objection at this point appears to be impaired.
(There may be an argument that Enron noted its objection within the permit
comment period, which terminated after the deadline for filing any legal
objection, and therefore Enron noted its objection on the record and no one
is prejudiced by asserting its objection within the pending proceeding at
this stage, since discovery has only just been initiated).   In light of
these circumstances,  we could advise DEP that Enron's position is that it
does not object to the consolidation as long as the trial date is in January
2002 and as long as the parties  recognize that Enron will challenge the
proposed Nox limitation of 36 ppm under backup fuel use conditions with
respect to both permits in a consolidated proceeding.
        Please advise me of your thoughts.
           --Kerri
-----Original Message-----
From: Mann, Kay [mailto:Kay.Mann@ENRON.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 8:48 AM
To: BarshK@gtlaw.com; Krimsky, Steven; Jacoby, Ben; ReetzR@gtlaw.com
Cc: ReetzR@gtlaw.com
Subject: RE: DEP Air Permits-Conversation w/ Martha Nebelsiek re
Consolidation & Related Matters

Thanks for the clear report.

On the issue of the judge, I suggest we opt for whoever you think will
be most favorable, assuming we can get a hearing in January.

On the consolidation, what would we use as a basis for the objection? If
we don't have a decent basis I don't think we should object.

On a related issue, assuming we are going forward with the fuel oil
option on Deerfield, how are we going to put the 36 vs 42 issue in play?
Thanks,

Kay

	-----Original Message-----
	From: BarshK@gtlaw.com
	Sent: Wed 11/7/2001 7:28 PM
	To: Mann, Kay; Krimsky, Steven; Jacoby, Ben; ReetzR@gtlaw.com
	Cc: ReetzR@gtlaw.com
	Subject: DEP Air Permits-Conversation w/ Martha Nebelsiek re
Consolidation & Related Matters

	       Kay, Steve, Ben and Ryan,
	       I spoke with Martha today on the subject referred to
above and she
	advised me of the following :
	      1.   DEP is not contemplating a single, consolidated
permit but an air
	permit  for each of the Pompano Beach and Deerfield Beach
facilities.
	       2.   The petitioning local governments have no objection
to the
	consolidation proposed by DEP (no surprises there).
	        3.   Martha wants our input as to which ALJ we would
prefer to hear
	the case should DEP's request for consolidation be granted.   (
The upside
	to suggesting Judge Alexander is that we know that he have
already reserved
	his time for a 4-day hearing in January.  Otherwise, we might
choose Judge
	Stampelos based upon the prior comments that we have received
from our
	Tallahassee attorneys, although both Judges were considered to
be good.).
	          4. Martha indicated previously that she is looking for
a hearing
	in January, depending upon which ALJ hears the case and his
particular
	schedule.
	          5.  Martha advised me that she will file her request
for
	consolidation late tomorrow afternoon.  I told her, as we
discussed in our
	conference call, that if she does not hear from me to the
contrary, then we
	oppose the consolidation at this time.
	          6.  Martha agreed to provide us with the permit
language that DEP
	is proposing in connection with its Notice of Change of Agency
Position  on
	the Pompano Beach proceeding as soon as Al Linero completes the
drafting and
	she reviews the proposed permit conditions with him.  Martha
expects to
	provide us with the proposed permit language next  Monday or
Tuesday.
	          7.  The petitioning local governments have served DEP
with
	discovery.  I have yet to receive a copy of the discovery but
Martha intends
	to meet with Al Linero this Friday to discuss  DEP's response.
	          Based upon the foregoing, please advise me if you want
me to
	convey any further message to Martha prior to her filing of the
motion for
	consolidation tomorrow afternoon.  Specifically, I am interested
in your
	thoughts on our preference on the Judge that will hear the
proceeding, if
	consolidated, and whether we have any objection to DEP's filing
the motion
	for consolidation in which she will note our objection.  As we
discussed in
	our conference call, we can assert our position more fully in a
subsequent
	response to the motion for consolidation and can withdraw our
objection if
	we change our mind.
	         Thanks !  Kerri

	_______________________________________________________________
	The information contained in this transmission may contain
	privileged and confidential information.  It is intended only
	for the use of the person(s) named above. If you are not the
	intended recipient,  you are hereby notified that any review,
	dissemination, distribution or duplication of this
	communication is strictly prohibited. If you are not the
	intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email
	and destroy all copies of the original message.

	To reply to our email administrator directly, please send an
	email to postmaster@gtlaw.com.

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************

_______________________________________________________________
The information contained in this transmission may contain
privileged and confidential information.  It is intended only
for the use of the person(s) named above. If you are not the
intended recipient,  you are hereby notified that any review,
dissemination, distribution or duplication of this
communication is strictly prohibited. If you are not the
intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email
and destroy all copies of the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, please send an
email to postmaster@gtlaw.com.


Is this something we can use for all Canadian agreements?  Flexibility to
provide cash would certainly help our commercial negotiation of margining
rights within the contracts.

Please advise.

Bill

From: Sara Shackleton on 09/21/2000 12:32 PM
To: William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Cash Collateral Language

----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 09/21/2000 12:27 PM -----

	"Ross, Tracy " <TRACY.ROSS@ROYALBANK.COM>
	09/21/2000 11:30 AM

		 To: "'warren.nishimura@blakes.com'" <warren.nishimura@blakes.com>,
"'sara.shackleton@enron.com'" <sara.shackleton@enron.com>
		 cc: "McArthur, Ian " <IAN.MCARTHUR@ROYALBANK.COM>,
"'rick.borden@macleoddixon.com'" <rick.borden@macleoddixon.com>
		 Subject: Cash Collateral Language

As discussed.

 <<cash collateral.doc>>

Tracy Ross, Counsel, Royal Bank of Canada
Phone: 416-974-5503; Fax: 416-974-2217
File -

This email may be privileged and confidential.?
Any dissemination or use of this information by a person other than the
intended recipient(s) is unauthorized.? If you receive this in error, please
advise me immediately.

 - cash collateral.doc


5 State Energy Advisors Fired Over Conflicts Ethics: The consultants were
involved in buying electricity for California from a generator whose stock
they owned, setting up a clash of official duties, personal interests.
JEFFREY L. RABIN; DARYL KELLEY; RICH CONNELL
TIMES STAFF WRITERS

07/28/2001
Los Angeles Times
Home Edition
A-1
Copyright 2001 / The Times Mirror Company

The Davis administration, stung by charges of excessive secrecy, disclosed
late Friday that it has fired five energy consultants because of conflicts of
interest involving their official duties and personal finances.
A sixth consultant hired to help California purchase electricity has quit,
according to state records.
All were involved in purchasing electricity for the state from a generator
whose stock they owned.
In addition, the top lawyer for the agency buying the power was removed from
her position because of concern about the way the issue of potential
conflicts was handled.
Top advisors to Gov. Gray Davis told The Times that they learned of the
conflicts in the last week, after belatedly asking the consultants to file
required economic disclosure statements. A review of those documents, which
included stock holdings, showed that some of the consultants "may have
crossed the line," said the governor's senior advisor, Nancy McFadden.
State law prohibits officials from participating in decisions involving their
personal financial interests.
Although portraying himself as seriously concerned that such conflicts could
undermine public confidence, the governor has not required some of his most
influential private-sector advisors to file the kind of disclosure statements
that led to the firings.
Among them are two Wall Street veterans who have been most influential in
promoting the governor's energy rescue plan, which includes the largest state
bond sale in U.S. history.
The New York firms that employ executives Joseph Fichera and Michael Hoffman
have been paid $275,000 a month to, among other things, help pitch the
$12.5-billion bond issue to Wall Street analysts and state lawmakers. The
companies stand to make an additional $14 million if the state goes through
with the purchase of utility transmission lines.
Davis contends that Fichera, Hoffman and their associates fall into a
separate category of advisor, beyond the reach of the state's political
reform laws. Critics question the distinction.
"The governor's approach may be convenient for him," said Jim Knox, executive
director of the watchdog group California Common Cause, "but it ignores the
law."
Disclosure is crucial because the public needs to know that "decisions are
not being made by people who have a conflict of interest," Knox said. "Trying
to evade the law with a creative use of semantics is not what they ought to
be doing."
The firings disclosed Friday are unlikely to diminish criticism surrounding
the more than 50 consultants and advisors hastily hired by the administration
as it rushed into the power trading business this year.
More than $25 million is being spent by the state on consultants, according
to state records.
In the process, seemingly little attention was paid to routine government
ethics laws.
It took six months for state officials to direct the consultants to file even
basic disclosures of their personal finances, including investments. The
state Political Reform Act normally requires such forms to be filed publicly
within 30 days of starting work for state agencies.
Even with the hastily ordered disclosures made public thus far, the
circumstances of most of the stock transactions remain a mystery because key
information was omitted. Most of the consultants, for example, failed to
state when they bought the energy stocks.
One of those pressing hardest for an investigation of possible conflict of
interest violations and insider trading is Secretary of State Bill Jones, a
Republican who hopes to challenge Davis next year. Jones has accused the
governor of "a conscious policy of secrecy" in enforcing compliance with
public disclosure laws. This week Jones called for a federal Securities and
Exchange Commission probe of stock purchases by state energy consultants.
4 Traders Owned Shares of Calpine
The four traders removed this week all owned shares of Calpine Corp., a San
Jose-based power generator that has landed the largest share of the $43
billion in long-term state power contracts. Their investments ranged from
several thousand dollars to more than $100,000, records show.
While working for the state Department of Water Resources, officials said
they bought undetermined amounts of Calpine power on the state's behalf. More
than $14 million worth of electricity was purchased from the state by Calpine
in the first quarter of this year, according to the most recent records
available.
"We did not want them making governmental decisions and holding these
stocks," the governor's legal affairs secretary, Barry Goode, said in an
interview.
The highest-ranking consultant removed, Richard Ferreira, was hired on a
$500,000 contract in January to assist in obtaining bids for long-term power
and negotiating contracts, records show.
A former assistant general manager with the Sacramento Municipal Utility
District, Ferreira was paid $200 an hour by the state. After he disclosed
owning as much as $10,000 in Calpine stock, officials discovered he had
participated in a review of one of the company's contracts. Ferreira could
not be reached for comment.
The governor's office identified the other four as traders William F. Mead,
Herman Leung, Constantine Louie and Peggy Cheng, most of whom could not be
reached Friday by The Times.
All of them formerly worked as energy schedulers at the Power Exchange, a
now-defunct energy market similar to a stock exchange created in the early
days of California's electricity deregulation.
Hired by the state in February and March, the four signed temporary contracts
calling for maximum payments of between $15,000 and $21,000 a month,
including living expenses in Sacramento and flights home to Southern
California.
Mead, 55, a former Edison engineer, said state officials never warned him
that owning energy stock was a problem until they demanded that he sell the
stock a week ago.
He said he bought nearly all of his shares 2 1/2 years ago for $12,000 and
saw its value skyrocket as the stock split three times, doubling in value
each time.
Mead said he was called by the head of the state's energy buying team
Thursday and fired.
"I asked very directly, 'Is this because of the stock?' and they wouldn't
give me an answer," Mead said. "[He] just said your services are terminated.
"I came up here, away from home, living in a hotel room, trying to keep the
lights on, trying to get the state through a crisis and now I get a finger
pointed at me as if I'm some sort of criminal. I guess it's just politics and
we're the pawns."
Administration officials said they also are examining the actions of other
traders, including one who bought Calpine stock just before beginning work
for the state. That trader, Elaine Griffin, who also came from the Power
Exchange, left the state power buying operation July 14, three days after
disclosing her energy industry investment. Griffin, who the governor's office
said had obtained another job, could not be reached for comment.
Griffin reported purchasing $10,000 to $100,000 of Calpine stock on Feb. 1,
in her final days working at the electricity exchange.
A few days later, Calpine signed and announced a $4.6-billion, 10-year deal
to sell power to the Department of Water Resources.
On Feb. 20, Griffin joined the state power buying agency, just as the state
and Calpine were finalizing an additional $8.3 billion in power contracts.
One of those, a 20-year deal signed Feb. 27, was the longest.
The state has awarded Calpine about $13 billion in contracts to supply power
for up to 20 years.
In addition to the state consultants who bought Calpine stock, two others
reported owning stock in Texas-based power marketing giant Enron Corp. And
two more bought stock in Southern California Edison, the faltering utility
that Davis has committed himself to saving from bankruptcy.
Another consultant bought stock in Reliant Energy of Houston, a large power
plant operator that bought several California plants from utilities after
deregulation.
Bernard Barretto, an energy trader, who buys energy on the daily spot market,
said in an interview that he bought about $2,000 in Enron stock shortly
before he began work for the state Feb. 28.
Purchase of Enron Stock Defended
"I don't see a conflict," he said. "At the time, we weren't really dealing
with Enron. I [still] haven't bought from Enron."
Barretto said he never considered his Enron ownership a possible conflict
until he received notice July 18 that he had to sell the stocks by noon or
lose his job.
That notice came from Goode, the governor's lawyer.
"We expect and have always expected the state's consultants to uphold the
highest ethical standards," he wrote. "That standard is not met by those who
hold a financial interest in one or more energy companies while trading on
behalf of the state on energy related matters."
"Therefore each consultant who holds an interest in an energy company must
divest himself or herself of that interest by noon today. If he or she
refuses, the state will sever its contract with that person."
However, the governor's office has taken a distinctly different stance with
his closest financial advisors, Fichera and Hoffman.
Davis aides cite an opinion sought last week from attorney Raquelle de la
Rocha, a former member of the Los Angeles Ethics Commission and the state
Fair Political Practices Commission. She concluded that the advisors do not
have to file disclosure statements because they are contractors, not
consultants, and will be working for less than a year on a limited range of
projects.
Fichera is Davis' point man on the governor's energy rescue plan--including
the unprecedented bond sale. He has pitched the plan to lawmakers, reporters
and the Wall Street financial community. Fichera refused to comment on the
record.
Fichera and Hoffman's companies, Saber Partners and Blackstone Group,
prepared a controversial analysis that helped underpin legislative approval
of the bond measure, intended to pay for past and future power buying.
Pact Specifies Financial Advice
The state's contract with the Fichera and Hoffman firms calls for them to
provide "financial advisory services" to the state.
The decision not to require public disclosure of their financial holdings
stands in sharp contrast to the approach taken with Montague DeRose and
Associates. That consulting firm was hired on a $1.8-million contract. Like
the other two firms, it too was hired to provide "financial advisory
services" to the state.
That firm's top advisor, Douglas S. Montague, was required by the
administration to fill out a disclosure statement. He reported no power
company interests.
The governor's legal advisors said the difference is that Montague is on a
longer contract.

PHOTO: Barry Goode, above, governor's legal affairs secretary.;
Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE  Merchant Power Monthly     ........................    .....   [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]    In just this month's issue, we have almost 7,000 MW of new plants documented!      -  - Plus, the records on who owns each plant, their corporate  structure, ownership changes and even foreign plants.   Gleaned from FERC filings, we also provide you the docket  number for each plant, so you can follow up and pull full  documentation on any which are of interest-- free!  We  also provide you with feature stories on plants in progress  from around the nation.   SPECIAL OFFER:   Order Merchant Power Monthly for only  $196/year ($295/year if you require hardcopy) and receive  FREE all of the back-issues of this millenium (in pdf format   Every Exempt Wholesale Generator, Qualifying Facility,  Power Marketer Filing, since January 2000, and start your  subscription in February 2002, for only $196!   Save even more with a corporate pdf site license.  Only  $1,000 for distribution to your entire company!  Keep it on  your server for access as required, rebroadcast it yourself,  or give us the list of recipients and let us take care of  delivery for you-- your choice!   FOR THIS SPECIAL OFFER, YOU MUST ORDER BEFORE  February 15   For a sample issue, download: htt p://www.pmaconference.com/0201MPM.pdf  email:  info@pmaconference.com   voice: (703) 641-0613                 [IMAGE]  This email was sent to vkamins@enron.com, at your request, by PowerMarketers.com .    Visit our Subscription Center to edit  your interests or unsubscribe .  View our privacy policy .   Powered by  Constant Contact


Can Brad Richter and Savita Puthigai attend the next trader meeting you have to let all the traders know that Savita and her organization (call center, product control, business analysis, trader support, etc.) now report officially to Brad Richter going forward and not Jay Webb?

Savita and I discussed this today and we both agree that this is best and that explicit change should occur now.  Savita is still committed to staying until the end of 2001, getting in some new talent in her group, training Brad, working with Webb, taking care of the traders, etc.  I will talk with her in December or January about what might be next for her.

Jay Webb is also supportive of this.  When he and I agreed that Savita reporting to him was taking him away from a large, complex development job, he said Brad should take the role.  Jay works well with Brad and thinks Brad, with time, will work well in Andy Zipper's old role.  Jay also signed a new contract recently and is committed to leading all technical and operational issues for EnronOnline and will be working closely with Brad and Savita.

Let me know your thoughts.

GP


?
100hot
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
?100hot

?Art & Museums
?Books
?Events
?Music

?Election  2000
?Finance
?Finance  Searches
?Jobs
?Loans
?Mortgages
?Net  Executives
?Small Business  Searches
?Stock  Charts
?Stock  Quotes
?Stocktalk

?Books
?Book Best  Sellers
?College
?Kids

?Adult
?Books
?Celebrities
?DVD Best  Sellers
?Gambling
?Jokes
?Movies
?Movie  Previews
?Music
?Music Best  Sellers
?Music  Previews
?Musicians
?Video Best  Sellers

?Gambling
?Games
?Game  Previews
?Gaming  Questions
?Playstation 2  Retailers

?Family & Parenting
?Food & Cooking
?Holiday Food &  Decor
?Home &  Gardening
?Kids
?Kitchen Best  Sellers
?Lawn &  Patio Best Sellers
?Pets
?Real Estate
?Tools & Hardware Best  Sellers

?100hot
?Asian
?Australian
?European
?South  American

?Jokes

?Cars
?Chat
?Dating
?Kids
?Spirits
?Travel
?Travel Deals
?Travel  Searches

?Election  2000
?Magazines
?Newspapers
?Politicians

?Athletes
?Health
?NBA Stars
?NFL Stars
?Sports
?Travel
?Travel Deals
?Wrestling  Stars

?Auction
?Athletic Gear
?Book Best  Sellers
?Books
?Cars
?Clothing
?Electronics
?Electronics Best  Sellers
?Entertainment
?Flowers
?Free Deals
?Playstation 2  Retailers
?Shopping
?Software Best  Sellers
?Toys
?Toys & Video Games Best  Sellers

?Athletes
?Celebrities
?Musicians
?NBA Stars
?NFL Stars
?Politicians
?Wrestling  Stars

?Computing Searches
?Developer
?Electronics Best  Sellers
?Hardware
?Internet
?Mac OS
?Software Best  Sellers
?Unix
?Wireless
?Windows

[IMAGE]
Click Here

	Ranking the Web's most visited sites and more!

	?Search: 100hot?The Web?Yellow Pages?

	[IMAGE]

	Click here!

	?Top-Ranked Blonde Jokes:
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]

	[IMAGE]
	< Previous  Joke?? Next  Joke >
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	Pick a joke  category100  Hottest!AnimalBarBlondeCannibalCelebrityCollege
FarmerFinanceFishingFoodGeekGenieHuntingKidKnock-KnockMenOfficeOneLinerOther
PoliticalReligiousSportsWomanXXX (Adult)YourMama

	"How to Kill A  Blonde"

	Score: 65
	(posted by Shella on  07/31/00)

	One Day, A Blonde walks into a hair salon with  headphones on. The
Hairstylist said:

	"What would you like done today?"

	The Blonde Answered..."I want to get my hair permed."

	"Well, you're gonna have to remove those headphones first."  answered the
hairstylist.

	"But I can't! My parents said that if I EVER take them off, I'll  die!" The
Blonde said

	"Alright, I'm gonna go get the stuff I need, and when I come  back, you
better have those off." the hairstylist replied. So as she  was walking into
the backroom, the blonde appempted to take off the  headphones.

	When the hairstylist returned, she found the blonde sprawled out  on the
floor. She was dead. The hairstylist picked up the headphones  that were
laying next to her. There was a voice on the headphones  saying:

	"Breathe in, Breathe out, Breathe in, Breathe out, Breathe in,  Breathe
out."

		[IMAGE]

		[IMAGE]

		[IMAGE]
		[IMAGE]

		[IMAGE]
		[IMAGE]
		[IMAGE]
		[IMAGE]
		1. Pokemon Gold &  S...
		2. Shenmue
		3. SSX
		4. Delta Force:  Lan...
		5. Onimusha  Warlords

		See entire  list

		[IMAGE]
		[IMAGE]
		[IMAGE]
		[IMAGE]

		[IMAGE]

		[IMAGE]

		[IMAGE]
		[IMAGE]

		[IMAGE]

		Rate this joke:
		Wet myself  laughing
		Funny
		Sucked
		My grandma tells a better joke

		[IMAGE]
		[IMAGE]
		Hit 100hot with friends!
		Use 100hot Communicator to  chat with friends, look at pages together and
truly interact! Download it today -- it's  hot and cool at the same time!

 - logo_main.gif
 - m_hot_n.gif
 - m_arts_n.gif
 - m_bus_n.gif
 - m_edu_n.gif
 - m_ent_n.gif
 - m_game_n.gif
 - m_hng_n.gif
 - m_intl_n.gif
 - m_joke_n.gif
 - m_life_n.gif
 - m_new_n.gif
 - m_sports_n.gif
 - m_shop_n.gif
 - m_star_n.gif
 - m_tech_n.gif
 - transparent.gif
 - 0818.gif
 - tagline.gif
 - 0056.gif
 - joke_submit.gif
 - curve3.gif
 - email_a_joke.gif
 - grey_curve.gif
 - lines.gif
 - p_game_previews.gif
 - chart?outputtype=gif&layout=1x1&aaid=2012005
 - partner_bottom.gif
 - joke_lines.gif
 - lineblock.gif
 - curve4.gif
 - instant.gif


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/12/2001
03:38 PM ---------------------------
From: Iris Mack/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/12/2001 02:44 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: Parent - Subsidary Model

Hi,

I don't know if you have the attached document from Ben Parsons.

As we discussed earlier, Anita put me on your calendar for next Tuesday at 2
pm to discuss the Duffie project.  I hope that is ok.

Thanks,
Iris

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Valnek, Tomas
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 9:10 AM
To: Fiala, Markus; Seyfried, Bryan; Salmon, Scott; Kirkpatrick, Eric;
Mumford, Mike; Fontaine, Jean-Sebastien; Brooks, Simon; Price, Nigel;
Diprose, Robert; Rezaeian, Reza; Gordon, Mike; Lee, Derek; Hershkovitz, Ilan;
Golden, Sally; Stephan, Nicholas; Albanis, George; Shanbhogue, Vasant; Mack,
Iris
Cc: Parsons, Ben
Subject: Parent - Subsidary Model

Attached is a description of the parent-subsidiary model that Ben and I have
been working on over the last few weeks.

Comments welcome!

TV


Jester
You are a fag.


Sam,

Thanks for forward thinking. What about a new asscoiate
Kate Lucas or Sharad?

I shall beat on people (or myself) to produce

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  William Smith @ ENRON                           11/09/2000 07:58 AM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Newsletter update

Good Morning, Vince!

After going over our department list, I believe that, with the exception of a
part-timer or two, we have covered everybody in the newsletter.  If we have
recently hired someone who might not be on the list, would you please let me
know?  Also, if you have a good article from someone that we can use for a
Technical Corner, we will need that, too.  I'm going to put out a general
call for TC material today.  Hopefully, we will get several things we can use
for the coming weeks.

Sam


Janine --

Who is IMServe?  I'm guessing they are a vendor that does billing, etc.  You should e-mail Evan Hughes to determine the nature of the CSC arrangement.  But I don't think that we want to give our business to a company because they help in one case?

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Migden, Janine
Sent:	Sunday, August 12, 2001 10:13 PM
To:	Steffes, James D.; Kingerski, Harry; Ader, Jeff; Ulrich, Marc; Dotson, Marcus
Subject:	IMServe

IMServe is interested in participating in the ComEd case as part of our ARES coalition but wants to assess whether there is a business opportunity for them.  Are we bound in contract to CSC or would we be open to a presentation by them for them to handle our  business?  Please advise or let me know who I should talk with that makes those decisions.
Thanks,
Janine


MINANA files of JAN&FEB 2002 for FENNER has been loaded.For jan2002 large
gaps are there in the data due to turbines not containing full months data
and also some turbines started from 22nd jan and other from 27th jan.
For JAN 2002 turbine 7 is having less number of records due to duplication of
records.

For FEB2002 turbine15 started data from 7th feb were as other turbines are
having from 4th feb.That is the reason it is having less number of records.

Total number of records are 51484.Please look at the data and let me know if
any problems are there.