----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 06/11/2001 11:22 AM -----

	"Fergus, Gary S." <GFergus@brobeck.com>
	05/23/2001 07:06 PM

		 To: "Richard B. Sanders Esq. (E-mail)" <richard.b.sanders@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: Enron Proposals Regarding Document Subpoenas

FYI
Thanks
Gary

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Meringolo, Peter
> Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 5:01 PM
> To: Fergus, Gary S.
> Subject: FW: Enron Proposals Regarding Document Subpoenas
> Importance: High
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fergus, Gary S.
> Sent: Monday, October 09, 2000 9:59 AM
> To: Meringolo, Peter
> Subject: FW: Enron Proposals Regarding Document Subpoenas
> Importance: High
>
> FYI.
> Thanks
> Gary
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fergus, Gary S.
> Sent: Friday, October 06, 2000 2:57 PM
> To: 'hym@cpuc.ca.gov'
> Cc: 'MBD'
> Subject: Enron Proposals Regarding Document Subpoenas
> Importance: High
>
> Harvey Morris Esq.
> California Public Utilities Commission
> 505 Public Utilities Commission
> San Francisco, California   94102
>
>  Re:   I.00-08-002  Subpoenas Served on Enron Power Marketing, Inc.
> ("EPMI"), Enron Energy Services Operations Inc. and Enron Energy Services
> Inc. (collectively referred to as "EES"), Enron Energy Marketing
> Corporation ("EEMC"), and Portland General Electric Corporation ("Portland
> General")(collectively sometimes referred to as the "Enron Entities")
>
> Harvey,
>
>  Here are our proposals with respect to the Enron Entities'
> production of documents pursuant to the above described subpoenas issued
> by the California Public Utility Commission (hereinafter "the
> Commission").  The Enron Entities are willing to assist the Commission in
> undertaking its investigation into the problems in the California electric
> markets by producing the information specified on a timely basis.  We
> believe that the production we propose will enable the Commission to
> commence its investigation much sooner than if the parties were forced to
> litigate all of the potential objections to the requests for production,
> which are, by any standard, extremely broad and could involve millions of
> pages of documents.  We make these proposals pursuant to our email
> exchange of October 3, 2000 with the understanding that the Commission
> agrees that by cooperating, offering to produce or producing documents,
> the Enron Entities have not waived any objections or challenges to these
> subpoenas whatsoever and that any claims, defenses, objections,
> jurisdictional or otherwise or other responses have been specifically
> reserved and can be raised in the future, if necessary.   For all of these
> proposals, we exclude documents that are protected from disclosure by the
> attorney client and attorney work product privileges.
>
>  Generally speaking, the Enron Entities propose to produce documents
> for year 2000 as noted below.  We also understand that the Commission will
> be obtaining documents from the ISO and PX and we will not attempt here to
> duplicate documents that we understand will be produced by those entities.
> As you will see in the general documents that are offered here for
> production, Enron Energy Services Operations, Inc. is the parent of Enron
> Energy Services, Inc. and does not have operating authority or engage in
> wholesale or retail purchases or sales of energy.  Thus, the documents
> offered here with respect to those two entities originates with Enron
> Energy Services, Inc. but we have designated them both as EES.  We also do
> not propose to offer duplicative documents as between the Enron Entities.
>
> GENERAL DOCUMENTS
> Requests 1 through 4
>
>  Because of the dynamic nature of the Enron Entities' businesses, the
> burden and expense on them to locate, and produce every corporate
> organizational chart anywhere in their organizations since April 1, 1998
> is significant.   The Enron Entities will provide the Commission with
> exemplars of their current organizational charts, telephone directories
> and so called "family trees" to show its current organization.  To the
> extent that the Enron Entities can readily identify and locate exemplars
> of significant organizational charts, telephone directories or so called
> "family trees" for earlier periods they will also make those available.
> One Enron Entity, Portland General, has published books on its corporate
> history.  If a list of those books would be helpful, we can provide it.
> With respect to the other Enron Entities, to the extent that corporate
> histories can be found, they will be produced.  We anticipate producing
> these documents in the first wave on October 13, 2000.
>
> Requests 5 and 6
>
>  The Enron Entities propose that their responses to Requests 1-4 will
> identify their relationship to affiliated companies and the Transaction
> Documents will identify its customers and suppliers.  We believe this
> information will be sufficient to illustrate these relationships for the
> staff's purposes.
>
> FINANCIAL DOCUMENTS
> Requests 7 through 11
>
>  The Enron Entities will produce their public filings for the period
> requested with respect to financial data.  EPMI, EES, and Portland General
> will provide to the Commission electronic transaction data ( the
> "Transaction Documents") for the purchase and sale of energy delivered
> which information includes economic data.   We anticipate producing public
> filings regarding financial data on October 13, 2000 and the electronic
> Transaction Documents in the second wave of document productions.
>
> GENERATING DOCUMENTS
> Requests 12, 14 and 18
>
>  For the Enron Entities other than Portland General, the generation
> facilities are either non-existent or limited in number and there will
> probably be limited documents available.  The Enron Entities to the extent
> they act as a scheduling coordinator or possessed the right to use or
> resell generation output, do not have the specific documents that pertain
> to each generation unit requested.  The Enron Entities, other than
> Portland General, do have documents and information for Las Vegas
> Cogeneration.  We propose to produce these documents in the second wave of
> document productions.
>
>   For Portland General, the production of the requested documents
> would involve a tremendous volume of documents, as Portland General owned
> twenty generating facilities of a variety of types and sizes during 2000.
> Portland General is a net importer of energy and can only generate about
> one half of its total energy demand.  As a result, we question whether the
> effort required of Portland General is warranted as its impact on the
> California wholesale market is necessarily limited.  Nevertheless,
> Portland General proposes to provide for year 2000 electronic Transaction
> Documents in summary form similar to the data being provided by other
> Enron Entities, to the extent relevant as discussed below.  We propose
> that the Commission defer requesting production of other information until
> it has reviewed the information of generators who sell a significant
> proportion of their energy into the California market.  At that time a
> more accurate assessment can be made of whether this enormous effort will
> be valuable given the limited impact of Portland General generation on the
> California wholesale market.
>
> TRANSACTION DOCUMENTS
> Requests 13, 15, 16, 17 and 19
>
>  We understand that the Commission will be obtaining trading data for
> the purchase and sale of energy delivered in California from the ISO and
> PX.  EPMI can provide the Commission several different sets of relevant
> transaction data for year 2000 (in California and outside of California
> and Real Time) for the purchase and sale of energy delivered with the
> date, counterparty, quantity, delivery point, hours, price, and whether it
> is a purchase or a sale.   Because of the speed with which you want this
> information, it is possible that some entries will be incomplete or
> inaccurate.  For those
> transactions where EPMI served only as the scheduling coordinator, we
> understand that the ISO will show part of the transaction, but there will
> not be a corresponding transaction in the EPMI data we can provide
> quickly.  The reason is that this type of transaction is passed through to
> EPMI's customer on an accounting system rather than as part of the trading
> business.  EES can also provide similar data with respect to relevant
> wholesale and retail transactions with the proviso that with respect to
> retail transactions it will not include the specific names of its retail
> customers but instead will provide a blind customer number due to EES'
> confidentiality obligations to those customers.  We anticipate producing
> the Transaction Documents in the second wave of document productions.
>
> FERC DOCUMENTS
>
> Request 20
>
>  The Enron Entities will produce the requests for data they received
> from FERC and to the extent that FERC has been given responses, copies of
> those responses.  We anticipate producing the FERC documents on October
> 13, 2000.
>
>
>  Based upon discussions that we have had with the various Enron
> Entities, we believe that we could make a second wave of productions on
> Friday October 27, 2000.  It is possible that not all Enron Entities could
> make that date but we believe the bulk of the data could be available for
> production by then.
>
>  We propose to make these productions with the understanding that if
> any entity obtains a more stringent protective order than the one
> currently in place, that all of the Enron Entities document productions
> will be protected by the most stringent protective order.  In addition,
> if, at the request of any party or nonparty to this proceeding, the
> Commission or a court of competent jurisdiction orders that the requests
> for production be limited, reduced or eliminated, the Enron Entities
> reserve the right to limit the production of documents in conformance with
> such order.
>
>  We understand that you will consider these proposals and let us know
> if they are acceptable to the Commission.  If you have any questions or
> comments about our proposal, please do not hesitate to contact Michael Day
> or myself.
>
> Brobeck Phleger & Harrison LLP
>
> Gary Fergus
>
>
>
>
>

=======================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of
the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to
postmaster@brobeck.com
BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP
http://www.brobeck.com


Pursuant to today's conference call, attached please find a prioritized
list of legislation we are monitoring during the second extraordinary
session.

 - legislative update 6-21-01.doc


----- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 08/25/2000 09:05 AM -----

	Diana Seifert
	08/25/2000 05:16 AM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Lara Fields/LON/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Guest access Chile

Hello Mark,

Justin Boyd told me that your can help me with questions regarding Chile.
We got a request for guest access through MG.
The company is called Escondida and is a subsidiary of BHP Australia.

Please advise if I can set up a guest account or not.
F.Y.I.: MG is planning to put a "in w/h Chile" contract for Copper on-line as
soon as Enron has done the due diligence for this country.
Thanks !

Best regards

Diana Seifert
EOL PCG


---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 11/10/2000 01:43 PM
---------------------------

Bob M Hall@ENRON
11/10/2000 10:27 AM
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: HPL list

Attached is the list we supplied to Fran.

I will call with the ones that have moved on.

thanks

bob


---------------------- Forwarded by Mike Grigsby/HOU/ECT on 03/13/2001 08:33
AM ---------------------------

	From:  Mike Swerzbin                           03/13/2001 08:14 AM

To: Mike Grigsby/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: New Generation Report 2/28/01

---------------------- Forwarded by Mike Swerzbin/HOU/ECT on 03/13/2001 06:21
AM ---------------------------
From: Jeffrey Oh on 02/28/2001 09:59 AM
To: Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julie A Gomez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tim
Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matt Motley/PDX/ECT@ECT, Mike
Swerzbin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim Gilbert/PDX/ECT@ECT, David Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT,
Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jim Buerkle/PDX/ECT@ECT, Angela
Cadena/PDX/ECT@ECT, Elliot Mainzer/PDX/ECT@ECT, Todd Perry/PDX/ECT@ECT, Laird
Dyer/SF/ECT@ECT, Michael McDonald/SF/ECT@ECT, Ed Clark/PDX/ECT@ECT, Dave
Fuller/PDX/ECT@ECT, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Michael Etringer/HOU/ECT@ECT,
John Malowney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stewart Rosman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff
Shields/PDX/ECT@ECT, Julie Sarnowski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kim Ward/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill
Williams III/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jeff Richter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sean
Crandall/PDX/ECT@ECT, Tom Alonso/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: New Generation Report 2/28/01


If you find any fundamental problems with this model let me know.


With respect to he Bakersfield Californian on the list below, I am amending
my original approval for this counterparty to approve them to enter into
newsprint swaps and options only.  At this time our list does not reflect the
individual products you are trading.  I understand from Mark Taylor that he
spoke to Jeff Harbert last night about amending your excel spreadsheet to add
the individual pulp and paper financial products, since restrictions such as
this one will occur from time to time.
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 08/09/2000 10:36 AM -----

	Tana Jones
	07/27/2000 10:21 AM

		 To: Jarrod Cyprow/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michelle Bruce/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Click Paper Approvals for 7/25/00

Attached is the referenced list.  The Bakersfield California is approved to
only do newsprint commodity swaps and options.  Therefore, I have turned them
down to trade the current products we have available online.  As our product
base expands, we can send them through again as an amended counterparty if we
offer newprint commodity swaps and options online.


Not a problem, Jimmie.  About this week's case.  Been travelling.  I'm back.
Kim:  in your absence on Monday, we talked a little about how to proceed on
the next case.  How's this sound:  everyone takes a question.  If the answer
to one question depends on the answer to another, the folks doing those
questions should get together and discuss.  Everyone should distribute to the
team a draft of the answer to the question by tomorrow (Thursday) night.
Then folks could look at the responses, make suggestions, comments, etc. and
distribute via email by Noon on Saturday.  I'll then compile in a form that
we can submit on Monday.  Thoughts?

I have randomly selected questions:  here are the results.  Jeff--#3;
Jimmie--#1; Kim--#2; Dylan--#4.  If folks are comfortable with this
distribution, let me know.

Best,
Jeff

"Jackson, James (JCJA)" <JCJA@chevron.com> on 09/13/2000 01:58:27 PM
To: "'Dylan Windham'" <dwindham@uclink4.berkeley.edu>, jdasovic@enron.com,
jjackson@haas.berkeley.edu
cc: kkupiecki@arpartners.com
Subject: RE:

Team
My Haas e-mail is forwarded to my work e-mail.  Last week I was on vacation
and did not see any of these e-mails.  I worked all 4 questions in what
turned out to be a parallel path (I will say your compiled answers were a
lot better than mine).  Anyway, please add my home e-mail address
"jcjcal02@aol.com" (Thats a zero next to the 2) in addition to my hass email
address.  This will give me access to the data regardless of where I'm at.
This is particularly important on weekends.  Sorry I let you down on the
first case.
Jimmy

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dylan Windham [SMTP:dwindham@uclink4.berkeley.edu]
> Sent: September 11, 2000 7:44 AM
> To: jdasovic@enron.com; jjackson@haas.berkeley.edu
> Cc: kkupiecki@arpartners.com
> Subject:
>
>
>
> Hello gang,
>
> Here is the latest version with Kimberly's changes.  Review it and send me
> any changes.
>
> --Dylan
>  << File: E220 Northrop Casewrite up.doc >>


Thanks, Linda.

Rosie

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Robertson, Linda
Sent:	Thursday, October 18, 2001 4:39 PM
To:	Lay, Kenneth; Kean, Steven J.; Shapiro, Richard
Cc:	Long, Chris
Subject:	RE: Sheila and the Trade Promotion Authority

We have been working closely with the Trade Promotion outreach effort the White House established, and have regularly attended whip meetings with White House staff and others.  In that role, we are "working" a number of Texas Democrats.  I will talk again with the Congresswoman, and will call on Steve Kean to work her if needed.  No need for Ken's involvement with her at this point.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Fleming, Rosalee   On Behalf Of Lay, Kenneth
Sent:	Thursday, October 18, 2001 5:34 PM
To:	Kean, Steven J.; Shapiro, Richard; Robertson, Linda
Subject:	FW: Sheila and the Trade Promotion Authority

I asked Jim Kollaer if he had talked to our Washington office and he said they have been working on it, but this is going to take a call from Ken to Sheila.  Given the complexities of his schedule, if there is any other way, it would be good.  What do you think?

Rosie

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Jim Kollaer" <jkollaer@houston.org>@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, October 18, 2001 3:33 PM
To:	Lay, Kenneth
Cc:	Anne Culver
Subject:	Sheila and the Trade Promotion Authority

Ken, I am writing to ask Enron's assistance with a pro-Trade Promotion
Authority message to Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee.

The position of the Partnership and Enron are well known to Sheila.  She
consistently has voiced doubts about her ability to vote for trade
issues such as China PNTR and fast track/TPA, but in the end joins her
pro-business and trade colleagues in supporting these measures. You have
always been a very effective lobbyist on this issue.

Most recently, on October 10, 2001, Rep. Lee told Rep. Norman Dicks
(D-WA) (he was the first D to be a supporter of this new compromise leg
(HR 3005) and is whipping the issue for the Ds) that she is a no vote on
TPA (HR 3005).

Rep. Lee's reasons for not supporting this issue are as follows:

1. The process has been too partisan, Ds like Rep. Charles Rangel were
not consulted and brought to the table to develop compromise language in
the beginning.

2. Since only 25 - 30 Ds will be voting for this (and we need her to be
one of those) she will feel alone as a D.

ACTION REQUESTED:  Ken, could you or someone senior at Enron place a
call to Rep. Jackson Lee to voice strong support for TPA?

An appropriate message is that we want her to focus on good public
policy.  We are not defending the process.  This is about good
economics.  TPA benefits her consituents.

We have attached a study that highlights the benefits of trade in her
district.  This may be useful information.  It has employment numbers
and more.

The TPA vote could come next week, as early as Tuesday.  A call to her
here in Houston at 713-655-0050 would be appropriate, as the House is
recessed until Tuesday.

Thanks in advance for your positive response to this request.

 <<Texas 18 final PDF.pdf>>

Jim Kollaer
President/CEO
jkollaer@houston.org
713/844-3601

 - Texas 18 final PDF.pdf << File: Texas 18 final PDF.pdf >>


Russell this number is not in service?

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 05/26/2000 02:27 PM
---------------------------

Carrie Hollomon
05/26/2000 02:00 PM
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan
Harrison/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Jackson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Enron MidWest Responsibility Matrix

Per your request, attached is the following:

1.  High-level organization chart for the Enron MidWest Energy Operations
team

2.  Responsibility matrix/Contact list for Enron MidWest support organization
(more detailed and includes RAC, Credit, etc.)

Please let me know if you have any other questions or need anything else!
Thanks,
Carrie


Ben:

Let me start by thanking you for keeping the Everest II CAs in such an
organized manner.

I delivered copies of the available agreements to Kay Young for safe keeping
in the

Legal Department's Confidentiality Agreement Database.   I've also given your
CA files to Stuart

for  his E2 records.   Unfortunately, a little clean up remains on E2.  Your
files included five empty folders,

no CA, for the following entities:

1. AEP;
2. Ameren;
3. Diamond Generating;
4. Orion Power; and
5. Tenaska.

Please see what you can do to pull these agreements together for Stu's
records.  If I can help you out in anyway, please give me a call.

Take care,

Ed


-----Original Message-----
From: Lalani, Sean
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 11:52 AM
To: Zufferli, John; Biever, Jason
Subject: lavo_may_10 (slides 13-16)-revised (Aug 7, 2001).ppt


---------------------- Forwarded by Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT on 04/03/2000
05:12 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Dave Nommensen                           04/03/2000 04:51 PM

To: Edward Terry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tricia
Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Maria Garza/HOU/ECT@ECT, George
Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Carlos J Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kimberly S
Olinger/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Tommy J Yanowski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Mills/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas
Engel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Inja Chun/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Procedure for adding new Capacity tickets for multi-desk Service
utilization - revised

Revision in bold.  Pass on to any who may need this.

In order to provide the ability to track transport expense by Desk, Sitara
was modified to allow multiple Transport Capacity tickets for the same
Service Contract provided that they are for different desks and only one is
tagged as "Primary".  Here is the procedure for setting up new Capacity
tickets to reflect the "other" desks:

a.  You will probably first notice this via a warning/error message in Path
Manager when building a new path.  The message will read something like
"Source/Destination 123456 for desk IMCT does not match Service contract 3434
and will be removed."
b.  Make note of the deal number in the Service List of the Service contract
that you were using in the new path.
c.  Open that Transport Capacity deal in Sitara.  Then hit Copy.
d.  On the new deal:
 Change the Buyer from the old desk to the new desk that matches the Supply
or Market deal that you are pathing with.  If it a deal for which we are
  agent, then don't change the Buyer but instead change the Agent to the new
desk.  The "primary" deal will carry the actual Agent.  The Agent
  contract will get cleared.  Re-select the Agent Contract.
 Changing the Buyer causes the Contract field to get blanked out.  Re-select
the Pipeline contract.
 Just above the various exchange line items is a Primary Deal check box.
Un-check it.
 On each exchange line item, change the MDQ to zero and for any Negotiated
rates, uncheck them as well.  The "primary" deal will carry the MDQ and
  any negotiated Demand, Commodity or fuel.
 Hit Release.
e.  You may need to re-retrieve Path Manager.  You should see the Deal number
in the Service list now read "Multiple".  Right-click/Service Deals will list
the  specific deals.
f.  Re-build the path as you originally desired.  The warning/error message
should not appear again.

This could occur for any combination of Desk and Service Contract.
Please file this in your "Call Dave If I Can't Find This" folder.

Thanks, d.n.


market_relations@nyiso.com writes to the NYISO_TECH_EXCHANGE Discussion List:

Dear NYISO Market Participants:

On December 11 - 13, 2001 the NYISO will present NYMOC in the Lone Star
State. We've just posted the course on our web site at

http://www.nyiso.com/services/training/cinfo/index.html

This course is similar to NYMOCs run in the Albany NY area, except that it
does not include Billing and Accounting details. The program will address
the latest system updates, however, and rigorously covers all marketplace
topics.

The course will be conducted at the Hyatt Regency Houston, 1200 Louisiana
Street, Houston, Texas, from 8:30 am  Tuesday December 11 until 3:00 pm
Thursday December 13. If you're interested, we suggest you register early
as we expect a healthy turn-out. In order to get a realistic count, there
will be a $300 charge for no-shows, or for cancellations not made by 12:00
noon Monday, December 3.

Please call Customer Relations at (518) 356-6060, if you have any questions
regarding the course, or Debbie Doyle at (518) 356-6274 regarding
registrations.


I don't see that I got a response from Leslie on the above list.  Can you
check this one too?  Thanks!
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 07/12/2000 11:06 AM -----

	Tom Moran
	07/10/2000 05:20 PM

		 To: Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri
Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Gillette/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Molly Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cynthia Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary G
Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Enron Europe Global Contracts and Facilities, Enron
Europe Global CounterParty, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bradley
Diebner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey Richardson/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: EOL Credit Responses 07/10/00

Please find attached Credit's EOL responses for 7/10/00.

Regards
tm


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT on 05/31/2000 10:25
AM ---------------------------

Robert Superty
05/31/2000 08:14 AM
To: George Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Katherine L
Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward Terry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Diane H Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna Greif/HOU/ECT@ECT, Heather
Choate/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alex Saldana/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Unify Logistics on call contacts for Help Desk

All - FYI, I would suggest copying this and keeping it handy so you can use
off-hours when necessary (even though the help desk should do the contacting)

Alex - See me about this. I would like some of this info added to the second
wallet cards your working on.

Thanks - Bob
---------------------- Forwarded by Robert Superty/HOU/ECT on 05/31/2000
08:07 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Dave Nommensen                           05/30/2000 01:24 PM

To: Susan Lopez/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Dave McMullan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Trisha Luong/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diane E
Niestrath/HOU/ECT@ECT, Benedicta Tung/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff
Johnson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Robert Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna Greif/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Unify Logistics on call contacts for Help Desk

Susan,

I am planning to set up an on-call pager and cell phone for Unify Logistics.
In the meanwhile, please use the following for any Unify Logistics support
call you may receive:

Seq Name   Home  Pager   Cell
1) On Call Pager    713-284-3757 (not yet activated)
2) Dave Nommensen 281-558-9145 1-888-487-1865  713-562-3986
3) Dave McMullan  281-855-4106 713-285-4982
4) Trisha Luong  281-565-8149 713-285-8715
5) Diane Niestrath  713-682-7416 713-525-0334
6) Benedicta (BT) Tung 281-565-9669 713-285-0931

There are several subsystems within Unify.  The above list is strictly
related to Unify Logistics.  They are they guys that schedule gas on a 7 X 24
basis.
This does NOT cover the guys in Unify that do Settlements.

Once I have the on-call pager activated, I will let you know.

Thanks, d.n.


great news on the dividend front.   thanks  mcs

From: Mike Dahlke@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 07/09/2000 16:20 CDT
To: Mark Schroeder@ECT
cc: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Stella
Chan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Re: Korea status report

Mark,
I'll prepare the report you suggest over the weekend following the conclusion
of my short visit to Seoul this week.  One quick update, the draft consultant
report to MOCIE on various City Gas Supply Cost issues has a tentitive
conclusion on the dividend limitation.  Under the suggested guideline, a
company whose debt is less than 200% of its equity would be free to pay
whatever dividens it Board of Directors chooses.  This would free the key
"cash baring" companies within the SK-Enron family to dividend at any level
that the shareholders deem appropriate.

Mike D.

	Mark Schroeder@ECT
	09/07/2000 08:01 AM

		 To: Mike Dahlke/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Korea status report

Particularly since Steve got somewhat blindsided by Joe Sutton on the
stranded cash issue in Korea, and you have been working on that, among
others, I think it would be useful if you would list the 3-6 top priorities,
with a candid prognosis of where we can/cannot get to on those issues in the
next 6 and 12 months.  For example, I think Steve needs to be aware that our
JV partner has not shown any  interest in providing their necessary
support/assistance on the stranded cash issue, as I understtod you, as well
as taking a low profile on liberalisation issues and possibly the ROE
issue.   thanks  mcs


The NYMEX forward curve on our website seems to be having trouble getting curves past 3 years, but the curve does exist beyond that and is available.  We are currently working on improving our web based curve fetch.  If you need the curves past three years ill be more than happy to pull them for you.

To answer your second question, the basis curve "NGI - PGE/TOPOCK" is not a basis point that we currently have any positions in.  From what I gathered if we do make a position it would be more likely to be at PGE-City gate (NGI - PGE/CG).  As in other basis curves in the system, it all depends on if we have positions on those points or not.  I believe someone in Structuring would be more likely to answer those questions for you.  If i can be of any further assistance please let me know.

Neeran

Analyst - Gas Fundamentals
neeran.pathak@enron.com
713-345-4797

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	<paul.y'barbo@enron.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Wednesday, November 14, 2001 3:50 PM
To:	GASFUNDY
Subject:	Fundamentals Web Site Inquiry - Gas

Type of Inquiry: Request for General Assistance
Location: ECN1344
Phone: 5-4173
Email: paul.y'barbo@enron.com
Re Page:
Comments: Is the NYMEX forward curve available past 3 years? I see where to get it for 3 years but not beyond that.

Is the Basis curve "NGI-PGE/TOPOCK" in this system the same as the forward curve that the traders of that basis use to mark their books to market? What about the other basis cuves in this system?

Message Transmitted: Wednesday, November 14, 2001
This message was generated from the contact form on the Fundamentals Web Site.


SK - I've printed this out and have it in a folder.  mm

As requested:


Ben:

Some last minute additions to the site visit attendence list I set you
yesterday:

10/13/2000 Wheatland

Also attending will be

Bob Bruner
Manager, Technical Services
DENA

10/17/2000 Gleason
10/18/2000 Linclon

Also attending will be

Pete Wyberila
Director, Technical Services
DENA

Hopefully the addition of these gentlemen will not cause any issues, but if
not please don't hesitate to contact me.

Regards,

Joe Synnott


Just a note regarding my plans for Thanksgiving. I am going to fly out the
afternoon of Nov. 21 and will be back in the office on Monday the Nov.27. I
will need PJB to cover my daily trading on Nov.22.

Chris


Thanks, man.  Up until the trauma and the drama (the genesis of which remains
a mystery), I had a great time.  Please thank Sarah and Bob---great food,
great company, etc.  Tell them sorry for leaving all my stuff lying around.
Thanks for sending a single check.  $736 is the amount.  Talk to you soon.

Best,
Jeff

	"Scott Laughlin" <scottwl@hotmail.com>
	04/23/2001 04:23 PM

		 To: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re:

Sarah has the parka. I'll let you know as soon as I get it sometime this
week. I actually came home that night wearing Bob's jacket, and Kent went
home clad in mine... Shows you the state of affairs. Drinking red wine like
that really fucks me up big time. I need to switch to beer at some point...
Unfortunately, there wasn't much of it there. I had a great time, though.
Thanks for coming. I hope you had an okay time.

No problem about the check. I actually thought afterwards that that might be
easier for you. Could you just tell me the amount again, and I'll put it in
the mail today.

Good luck with school.

Cheers!

Scott

>From: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com
>To: scottwl@hotmail.com
>Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 12:39:41 -0500
>
>Dude:
>Two things.  First, in the midst of the craziness on Friday, my black,
>Northface parka ended up getting put someplace at Sarah's that I wasn't
>privvy to, and consequently I couldn't find it.  My house keys are in it,
>so it would great to get it back.  Could you check with Bob/Sarah and see
>if it's floating around someplace over there?  Muchos gracias.
>
>Second, could you do me a favor?  Could you pay me the full amount for
>Squaw and then collect from Cameron for what she owes you?  Sorry to be a
>pain in the ass, but I think logistically, it'll be a whole helluvalot
>easier to manage it that way (at least from my end).  And to be an even
>bigger pain.....since my schedule's a disaster with school coming to a
>close, could you stick the check in the mail?  My address is:
>
>366 Dolores St., #3
>SF, 94110
>
>Sorry for all the hassle.
>
>Happy birthday, man.
>
>Best,
>Jeff
>

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com


What a fucking day!

Curve shift (500K)
New deals 400K

This is a tough market to trade in.


Drew,

Did you already approve this expense report and send it to accounting?

Denise

---------------------- Forwarded by Denise LaGesse/ET&S/Enron on 12/05/2000
10:50 AM ---------------------------

DENISE LAGESSE
11/16/2000 04:04 PM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Susan's expense report 11/16/00

Please approve the attached expense report and cc: me on your approval.
Thanks!


A new Kudlow Commentary has been published on Kudlow.com. As a subscriber, you may click the hyperlink below, login, and view the latest commentary. AOL Users please note, you may need to copy and paste the hyperlink into your web browser.

Thank You,

Kudlow & Company, LLC.

http://www.kudlow.com/members/login.asp?To=Content&ContentID=362


Ashley,

I am so sorry we never managed to meet up while I was in London.  Emily and I
spent all day Sunday gallivanting around the city to the markets, etc. and
Monday I ended-up spending a lot longer than I planned at the office.  On the
bright side, I was able to have an impromptu interview and meet quite a few
people while I was there.  I'm hoping to be over there and gainfully employed
by early next spring.  Hope things are well with you and the next trip I make
over there we will definitely get together.

Susan


Are you aware?
----- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 02/15/2001 09:54 AM -----

	Doug Jones@ENRON
	02/15/2001 08:11 AM

		 To: Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Upstream GRM Transactions

Mike and Jeff,

The following is an update we sent out to Harvard and Ospraie regarding the
status of our transaction pipeline.  I thought it would be of interest to
both of you as well.

Gentlemen,

We have sent the final version of the CA to Hallwood to be signed, hopefully
we will receive information either tomorrow or early next week and have a
preliminary valuation and structure proposal by the end of next week.   We
are negotiating a CA with Nuevo and they appear anxious to get started.
Their general counsel told me they have prepared a box of due diligence items
to be delivered as soon as we agree on certain terms.  The DevX CA should be
finalized today as well and we will get started on that prospect hopefully
next week also.  We are still waiting on information from Chesapeake, but I
spoke with Marc Rowland last week and he is getting his new reserve report
finalized and will send it to us when it ready.  Benton is progressing albeit
slowly because of the complicated nature of the structure.  We are also
analyzing a new transaction that another group within Enron has originated
and structured a VPP around but they may not have favorable financing.  It
could represent an opportunity for both of you to see if a small equity
participation in the SPV is of interest.  That's it, call me if you have any
questions or comments.

"Porter, Stuart" <porters@hmc.harvard.edu> on 02/13/2001 07:48:08 AM
To: "'doug.jones@enron.com'" <doug.jones@enron.com>
cc:

Subject:

Doug,

I just wanted to say that you handled Hallwood perfectly. Also if it is time
to move on other fronts -- Benton / Nuevo -- I am ready to go. I think Nuevo
will probably be under pressure in the next few weeks after missing 4q and
reducing reserves.

Stu


Dear Dr. Lay,

We are looking forward to your participation at the upcoming "Markets
in Transition" symposium at Rice University on January 10, 2002.

Invitations to the event were sent approximately two weeks ago.  The
invitations listed the agenda and speakers.  We have completed
incorporating the biography and photograph that you provided into the
program brochure.

During the event, we have allocated 20 minutes, beginning at 1:40PM,
for your remarks on Markets in Transition.  We expect your remarks to
be broad in scope and to provide your views on how the economic and
market factors of recession, technology evolution, and heightened
security are impacting the business landscape.  Our hope is that your
remarks will be generic in nature -- Markets in Transition is a
concept that applies to virtually all industries.

We understand that you will make no reference to Enron.  Furthermore,
there will be no question and answer session after your presentation.
We will take measures to ensure that the press has no access to you
before or after your remarks.

Please return the speaker logistics form (requested separately) at
your earliest convenience.

We look forward to your participation.  Please contact me or Brad
Burke, Associate Director of the Rice Alliance (713-348-6136), if you
wish additional information.  Thank you.

Sincerely,

Steve Currall

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Steven C. Currall, Ph.D.
Associate Professor of Management, Psychology, and Statistics
Founding Director, Rice Alliance for Technology and Entrepreneurship
Jones Graduate School of Management
Rice University, MS-531, 6100 S. Main Street
Houston, Texas  77005-1892  USA
713.348.5387 (voice) 713.348.5251 (fax)
Personal: http://jonesgsm.rice.edu/content/content.cfm?PageID=133&FDSID=276
---------------------------------------------------------------------------


<<2XB902!.DOC>>  <<2XB9RED.DOC>>  <<2XB@02!.DOC>>  <<2XB@RED.DOC>>
<<2XFL02!.DOC>>  <<2XFLRED.DOC>>  <<2XFN02!.DOC>>  <<2XFNRED.DOC>>

Carlos:

We enclosed the following documents, revised in accordance with our
discussions, for your review:

1.  Letter Agreement between ENA and Panda Energy (clean and marked to
reflect changes from draft dated 3/5/01);
2.  LLC Agreement between ENA and Panda Energy (clean and marked to reflect
changes from draft dated 3/5/01);
3.  Letter Agreement between ENA and Delta Power (clean and marked to
reflect changes from Panda draft dated 3/5/01);
4.  LLC Agreement between ENA and Delta Power (clean and marked to reflect
changes from Panda draft dated 3/5/01);

Please review and advise of any further comments.  Thank you.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King & Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com>

Enclosures: 136485v2
  136485v2Rv1
  136486v2
  136486v2Rv1
  136641v2
  136641v2Rv1
  136643v2
  136643v2Rv1

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

 - 2XB902!.DOC
 - 2XB9RED.DOC
 - 2XB@02!.DOC
 - 2XB@RED.DOC
 - 2XFL02!.DOC
 - 2XFLRED.DOC
 - 2XFN02!.DOC
 - 2XFNRED.DOC


Track the new system in the Atlantic plus other possible development
with position maps, satellite and radar images plus official advisories
or post your forecast on the message board: http://www.GoPBI.com/storm?tag=e_1029

000
WTNT34 KNHC 291433
TCPAT4
BULLETIN
TROPICAL DEPRESSION FOURTEEN ADVISORY NUMBER   9
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE MIAMI FL
10 AM EST MON OCT 29 2001

...DEPRESSION NEARING TROPICAL STORM STRENGTH...

AT 10 AM EST...1500Z...THE CENTER OF TROPICAL DEPRESSION FOURTEEN
WAS LOCATED NEAR LATITUDE 28.0 NORTH...LONGITUDE 43.5 WEST OR
ABOUT 1215 MILES...1955 KM...WEST-SOUTHWEST OF LAJES IN THE AZORES
ISLANDS.

THE DEPRESSION IS MOVING TOWARD THE WEST NEAR 12 MPH...19 KM/HR.  A
TURN TO THE NORTHWEST IS EXPECTED OVER THE NEXT 24 HOURS.

MAXIMUM SUSTAINED WINDS ARE NEAR  35 MPH... 55 KM/HR...WITH HIGHER
GUSTS.	THE DEPRESSION IS NEARLY AT TROPICAL STORM STRENGTH...AND
COULD BECOME A TROPICAL STORM LATER TODAY OR TOMORROW.

ESTIMATED MINIMUM CENTRAL PRESSURE IS 1009 MB...29.80 INCHES.

REPEATING THE 10 AM EST POSITION...28.0 N... 43.5 W.  MOVEMENT
TOWARD...WEST NEAR 12 MPH.  MAXIMUM SUSTAINED
WINDS... 35 MPH.  MINIMUM CENTRAL PRESSURE...1009 MB.

THE NEXT ADVISORY WILL BE ISSUED BY THE NATIONAL
HURRICANE CENTER AT 4 PM EST.

FORECASTER FRANKLIN

Make GoPBI.com's Storm Warning Center your No. 1 resource for hurricane
and tropical storm updates: http://GoPBI.com/storm

To subscribe or unsubcribe from this list, visit our Web site:
http://GoPBI.com/storm/email

DO NOT REPLY to this email. If you have questions or comments,  send
them to storm@cimedia.com

Brought to you by GoPBI.com: http://GoPBI.com

You can contact us by mail or telephone at:
GoPBI.com
2751 South Dixie Highway
West Palm Beach FL 33405
(561) 820-3700

Copyright 2001 Cox Interactive Media


Start Date: 10/10/01; HourAhead hour: 23;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  Variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001101023.txt

Error retrieving HourAhead price data - process continuing...


---------------------- Forwarded by Kayne Coulter/HOU/ECT on 04/11/2001 11:39
AM ---------------------------

Andrea Dahlke@ENRON
04/11/2001 11:37 AM
To: Kayne Coulter/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Access to SVCE portfolio

Kayne-

These are the hourly traders that I've requested access to the new SVCE
portfolio for:

Keller Mayeaux   keller
Steve Olinde   solinde
Doug Miller   dmiller
Don Baughman   dbaughm
Pat Hanse   phanse_pc
Dustin Collins   dcollin
Chad Starnes   cstarnes
Narsimha Misra   nmisra
Joe Stepenovitch  jstepeno

I do not have Enpower ID's for the people listed below.  As soon as I get
them I will send in another access request.

Larry Jester
Joe Errigo
Chris Watts
Juan Hernandez
Rudy Acevedo
Miguel Garcia
Dean Laurent
Mauricio Trejo
J.D. Kinser
Juan Padron

Thanks Kayne!

Andrea


Paula,

I think I am OK with this.  Those are clearly among the factors driving the
final mechanics of the structure.  As for the AZX debt, I would like to be
able to focus on the absence of  a put, as opposed to acceleration.  We can
discuss this Thursday.

Thanks,
Mark

Paula Rieker
10/25/2000 08:38 PM
To: J Mark Metts/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Mark Koenig/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: Revised Letter

Mark -

I assume a key term in the eventual structure with AZX will be maintenance of
ENE's off-balance sheet treatment of AZX to ENE and no acceleration in the
AZX level debt or indirect obligations of Enron to Marlin.   Would you
agree?  If so, I would like to be free to set that probable criteria forth to
analysts/investors following the announcement.

With Reg FD, I am assessing whether we need reference to this key critieria
in one of the public documents (the letter or in the press release) in order
to set forth our intent to analysts/investors.

I understand why this criteria is not referenced in the letter.  Are you
troubled if we reference this in the press release and it is not in the
letter?

We can talk Thursday. THX  Paula


Notice # 01-56
February 9, 2001

TO:     All New York Mercantile Exchange Members and Member Firms

FROM:  Neal Wolkoff, Executive Vice President

RE:        CFTC Approval and Exchange Implementation of New End of Week
Post-  Close Trading Session

DATE:   February 9, 2001

Notice #  01-56
===========================================================

Please be advised that beginning on Friday, February 16, 2001, the Exchange
will offer a new end of week trading session. The new program applies only to
the NYMEX Division and does not affect COMEX,s existing post-settlement
session.

This new End of Week Session is being offered only for the crude oil, heating
oil, unleaded gasoline and natural gas futures contracts.  It is not
available for options contracts in these commodities.  In addition, the End
of Week Session is not available for NYMEX Division metals contracts nor will
it be offered for the Exchange,s propane futures contract.

Specifically, the new program provides for a special trading session (the
"End of Week Session") to be offered on certain days after the close as a
substitute on such days for the NYMEX Division post-close trading session.
This End of Week Session will be offered on Fridays and additionally on the
day before any mid-week Exchange holiday, e.g., Thanksgiving.

This End of Week Session shall be offered (20) minutes after the close of
trading in all futures contracts and shall be ten minutes in duration.  Thus,
on most Fridays, the End of Week Session will be offered from 3:30 to 3:40
p.m.  However, because next Friday is the Friday before an Exchange holiday
(President,s Day), early closing hours shall be in effect.

Therefore, for this reason, the End of Week Session to be offered next Friday
on February 16 shall be commence at 1:20 p.m. and shall continue until 1:30
p.m. On the following Friday, the End of Week Session shall be offered at the
3:30-3:40 time slot.

The new End of Week Session is both similar to and different from the present
post-close trading session.  Like the current post-close session, the End of
Week Session is limited to the first four listed contract months.  Also, like
the current post-close session, trading transacted during the new End of Week
Session shall not be included in the calculation of settlement prices.

Unlike the current post-close session, the trading range for the new End of
Week Session shall be the trading range for the entire day.  The more
expansive trading range should provide a better opportunity for unfilled
orders to be executed and for market participants to get flat in the market
for that trading session.

Also, unlike the current post-close session, there shall be no restrictions
on participation in the new End of Week Session.  However, only orders
submitted after regular trading hours may be executed in the End of Week
Session.

  If you have any questions concerning the new End of Week trading session,
please contact George Henderson, Vice President, NYMEX Floor Department, at
(212) 299-2071; Rob Stasi, Manager of Trading Floor Systems, NYMEX Floor
Department, at (212) 299-2067, or Brian Regan, Senior Associate General
Counsel, at (212) 299-2207.

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=sara.shackleton@enron.com&
refdoc=(01-56)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


Here is the posting for 3/14.

Thanks,

TK


Dave can you send me your morning weather package. Gaskill hasn't set us up on the fundy's site and we are flying blind up here.

Thanx

Chris
403-974-6910


Call Me


Please add this to my schedule.  Maybe, I can fly to Toronto the next day.
Ask Chris Gaffney if September 21 works for him instead of the dates I
proposed in August.   Mark
----- Forwarded by Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT on 07/13/2000 03:38 PM -----

	Rosemary Ryan <RRYAN@isda.org>
	07/13/2000 10:24 AM

		 To: Mark Haedicke <Mark.E.Haedicke@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: ISDA Members Update and E-Commerce Forum

Mark,

As you may know the ISDA Members Update and E-Commerce Forum will be held in
New York on September 20. The morning session will be devoted to committee
updates and the afternoon to e-commerce.

Would you be available to give a 10 minute update on the activities of the
Energy Committee.

Look forward to hearing from you.

Regards,

Rosemary
212 332 2555


FYI
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Thompson, Virginia
Sent:	Friday, August 31, 2001 11:55 AM
To:	Scholtes, Diana
Cc:	Crandall, Sean; Chang, Fran
Subject:	Modesto deals

Diana-

  I have put documentation in your box, but here is a summary of the Modesto deals:

Deal Number	Amount 	Date Entered 	Deal Date	Recognized and Pulled thru		PMA Statement Recognition

651899.1	-155,797.90	June-2001	April-2001	July-2001 (this one recognized late)	August-2001 (should have been July 01)
665408.1	-408,800.00	June-2001	May-2001	June-2001				July-2001
651899.2	-  31,134.28	July-2001	May-2001	July-2001				August-2001
693176.1	-504,162.50	July-2001	June-2001	July-2001				August-2001
	          -$1,099,894.68

Total recognized July 2001 PMAs:	($ 408,800.00)
Total recognized August 2001 PMAs:	($ 691,094.68)
				           ($1,099,894.68)

I hope that this helps.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Virginia


Mike,

We're still letting the dust settle up here.  Hunter may want to talk with you upon review of your resume.  Either way, I'll get back to you soon.  Thanks,

Fletch

-----Original Message-----
From: Bridges, Michael
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 7:29 AM
To: Sturm, Fletcher J.
Subject: FW: East Power

Fletch,

Want to re-stress my interest in the position we talked about Friday.  Looking forward to the opportunity.

Please find my resume attached.

Mike Bridges


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT on 03/14/2000
12:17 PM ---------------------------

	From:  William Kelly                           03/13/2000 01:43 PM

To: Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Jackson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

We have room EB3014 from 3 - 4 pm on Wednesday.

WK


I'm going in today, can we meet for lunch?

Also, please review attached form of risk memo in which I outline the risks
that I see in the PSEG transaction.  I have not elaborated the details yet
because I wnated to first confirm the outline with you.  I only expect to use
bullets below the issues I've identified.   Also, how much if any of this
should be added to the DASH which is also attached.  Lastly, since Mark is
out this week, I've addressed the memo to Julia since she will sign the DASH
(I gave her a heads up yesterday).  Thanks.  I've got a 10:30 call, but will
stop by may be before or more likely after.

Carlos Sole'
Senior Counsel
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street
Houston, Texas 77002-7361

(713) 345-8191 (phone)
713 646-3393 (fax)


Peter

I just remembered I have a Dr appointment on the 10th at 400 - can Derek make
it at 300


Attached is the referenced list, with the following comments:

1.  BC Gas Utility Ltd. was added as an amended counterparty by me.  We got
the financial master in place with them so we are opening them up for all
financial.
2.  Ferrell North America - we have a financial master in place with
Ferrellgas, L.P., d/b/a Ferrell North America.  That should be the name that
goes out on the confirm.

All the counterparties on today's list are shut down for power.


Some friends of my wife and I are throwing a little bash on the evening of
September 9th for my upcoming baby BOY.   I would like to invite you all to
attend.  I believe there will be a margarita machine....

If you want to come,, please reply by sending me your address.  You will then
recieve an invitation by mail.

Hope to see you there,,

Mike


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 05/23/2000
06:38 PM ---------------------------

"patricia dalecka" <pdalecka@hotmail.com> on 05/23/2000 12:04:52 AM
To: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com, vkaminski@aol.com
cc:
Subject: Recommedations

Hello Vince,

How are you?

Not much around except that I am seriously studying for Gmat. I am going to
take this test between June 12 to 15 and during the week following it I hope
to be ready to take TOEFL.
So far I am most concerned about writing and reading parts that require of
knowledge and using good vocabulary and for me is a time consuming because I
feel lost for words very often.
Ok, I be positive ...

I am writing to ask you for your support - recommendations.
I thought it might be more respected when I show recommendations "from here"
than from some people from different country.

Would you like to do it?

I am not quite sure what type of rec would you be able to provide me with.
I think it could be somehow based on our Aiesec relationship?
Do you have any other ideas?

I would like to bring this letter to the university next week along with my
request of application transfer from MBA dep to MS.
As for today I have enough recommendations - in numbers - but may be some
more recent one would add more value into it.
Do you need more details on: to whom it may concern or any others?

Please let me know if you can help?

Best regards

Patrycja

________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com


Gloria,

I need to have a redline generated by Comparwrite, as I don't have it loaded
locally.  The original document is in my Fuel Cell/Equipment contract file,
and has the same name as the one below, only it is dated October11 (I believe
rev 2).  The new document is the one below.  Please save the redline verision
in the same directory, and email the redlined document to me, Heather Kroll,
Scott Healy, and Stephen Plauche ASAP.

Thanks,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 10/27/2000 12:21
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Scott Healy @ ECT                           10/27/2000 12:03 PM

To: <hnock@fce.com>, <rlevine@fce.com>
cc: Stephen Plauche/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Fuel Cell Purchase Order

Per my voice mail, here is the latest draft of the purchase order (we are
preparing a redlined version which I will send you shortly).  We have not had
the opportunity to incorporate all the business terms which were discussed
and agreed to yesterday.  Also, we have not yet completed a full internal
review of the document.  However, so that we can hold our conference call
today, I am sending you the draft.  Please give me a call to arrange the
conference call.


Vasant,

I shall take 2 thin  mints and one apple cinnamon.

Vince

Vasant Shanbhogue
01/17/2001 03:20 PM
To: Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anita DuPont/NA/Enron@ENRON, Vince J
Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pinnamaneni
Krishnarao/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike A Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joseph
Hrgovcic/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Tamarchenko/HOU/ECT@ECT, Zimin Lu/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Martin Lin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Maureen Raymond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Osman
Sezgen/HOU/EES@EES, Paulo Issler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amitava Dhar/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Alex Huang/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Kindall/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kevin G
Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Clayton Vernon/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jose
Marquez/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Chonawee Supatgiat/Corp/Enron@Enron, Shalesh
Ganjoo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Halliburton/Corp/Enron@Enron, Elena
Chilkina/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sevil Yaman/Corp/Enron@Enron, Bob
Lee/NA/Enron@Enron, Gwyn Koepke/NA/Enron@Enron, Hector Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Youyi Feng/NA/Enron@Enron, V Charles Weldon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Praveen
Mellacheruvu/HOU/EES@EES, Li Sun/NA/Enron@Enron, Stephen
Bennett/NA/Enron@ENRON, Roman Zadorozhny/HOU/EES@EES, Lance
Cunningham/NA/Enron@ENRON, Shane Green/HOU/EES@EES, Kate Lucas/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Nelson Neale/NA/Enron@Enron, Rabi De/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jaesoo
Lew/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jason Sokolov/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Bigalow/NA/Enron@Enron,
Tom Barkley/NA/Enron@Enron, Rakesh Bharati/NA/Enron@Enron, George
Carrick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brad Blesie/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Milind Pasad/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jere C Overdyke/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Best/NA/Enron, Travis Winfrey/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Cliff Shedd/NA/Enron@Enron, Rafi Khan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Banu Ozcan/Corp/Enron@Enron, Donald M- ECT Origination Black/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Donna Baker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mauricio Mora/NA/Enron@Enron, Ted Noble/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Farouk Lalji/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Anyone for Girl Scout Cookies?

I have been drafted by my daughter again this year to check if anybody here
would like any (at $3 per box).
If you do, send me an email.
Choices are Shortbread, Coconut, Thin mints, Peanut butter creme, Peanut
butter with chocolate, lemon drops, nut and fudge, apple cinnamon.
Deliveries in late February to early March.

Thanks,
Vasant


please put this on my calendar.  thanks,

fletch


We parked 25,000 dt/day on the 25th-27th (deal 225515) on CNG and we will be
taking it out during April (deal 225534).  ENA will pay CNG $.02 x 75,000 dt
= $1,500.00 in April.

Please let me know if you have questions.


I can't remember how I got here but below is the URL.  It is a flash program
so sit back and watch.  Once the show is over go to the site map to review
the other related sites to this project.  They must have lots of people with
time on their hands to do this.  Wish we had the luxury!   cvb

http://dossier.enron.com/intro.htm


no problem.  give me a call and we can go through your list.
Best,
Jeff

	Scott Govenar <sgovenar@govadv.com>
	04/16/2001 10:21 AM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich <jdasovic@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: e-mail

Good morning Jeff,

Perhaps you could help me with something.  Our DSL provider, in an
effort to eliminate SPAM, has decided to limit group e-mails to 25
recipients or less.  My Enron list is considerably longer.  Based on a
previous e-mail, could you please give me an idea as to who I can
eliminate?  I've never heard of many people on the current list.

Thank you.

Scott


Here is the attachment we discussed....

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Williamson, Joannie
Sent:	Monday, July 23, 2001 3:54 PM
To:	Allen, Margaret
Subject:	GENIE

Margaret, the lists are not attached.  Would you mind sending these to me if you have in an spreadsheet.

Thanks,
Joannie

 << File: GENIE.doc >>


Please release the new version of PL Desk to production.

Thanks,
Stacey

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lewis,  Jon Paul
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 2:36 PM
To:	White, Stacey W.
Cc:	Evans, Casey; Martin, Karen Y; Crooks, William
Subject:	FW: PLDESK in Stage

Stacey-
The PL Desk report was modified, so I tested it earlier today and everything looked good.  Can you please send an email to Bill Crooks and Karen Y Martin so they can release the new version to production.

Thank you.

J.P.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kraltchev, Nikolay
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 9:23 AM
To:	Lewis,  Jon Paul
Subject:	PLDESK in Stage

JP,

Please test version 3.0.2.1 of PLDesk that is in Stage.
It shows the Category (cmdty, cpcty) that was missing before.

Let us know if it works good.

Thanks!
Nikolay
x5-7265

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lewis,  Jon Paul
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 1:13 PM
To:	Kraltchev, Nikolay
Subject:	RE: PL DESK REPORT QUESTION

Any luck with the PL Desk Report?

J.P.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kraltchev, Nikolay
Sent:	Wednesday, October 17, 2001 10:26 AM
To:	Lewis,  Jon Paul
Subject:	RE: PL DESK REPORT QUESTION

JP,

I got your message yesterday but I had to re-image my machine at that time.
I will look into it shortly and let you know what's the situation.

Thanks!
Nikolay

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lewis,  Jon Paul
Sent:	Wednesday, October 17, 2001 9:48 AM
To:	Kraltchev, Nikolay
Subject:	PL DESK REPORT QUESTION

Nikolay-
How did you get the column Deal Cat-Code to show up when you ran the PL Desk Report?  This was the column that separated the lines into Commodity and Capacity.  I don't see that column when I run this report.

J.P.


http://www.liquidgeneration.com/poptoons/kill_osama.asp

http://www.paratroopers.org/wwtgraphics.htm


Following up on my previous e-mail, Mark Seetin with NYMEX sent the
attached request for help to the California Manufacturers and Technology
Association and WSPA for NYMEX's proposed direct access amendments
currently pending before Congress.

Received: (qmail 20089 invoked by uid 41); 14 May 2001 23:51:17 -0000
Received: from unidial.com (206.112.0.9)  by mx7.quiknet.com with SMTP; 14
May 2001 23:51:17 -0000
Received: from markseetin (pool-63.52.131.137.dlls.grid.net [63.52.131.137])
by unidial.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id TAA10253; Mon, 14 May 2001 19:49:05
-0400 (EDT)
From: "Mark Seetin" <nymex2@unidial.com>
To: "Randy Poole" <rdp@scwa.ca.gov>, "Michael Kahl"
<mikahl@ka-pow.com>,        "Dorothy Rothrock" <drothrock@cmta.net>,
"Jack M. Stewart" <jstewart@cmta.net>,        "Chuck Cole"
<ccole@advocation-inc.com>,        "Scott Govenar" <SGovenar@govadv.com>
Subject: URGENT NEED TO CONTACT CALIFORNIA CONGRESS MEMBERS TO SUPPORT OPEN
ACCESS AMENDMENT  ADDRESSES ATTACHED
Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 19:49:06 -0400
Message-ID: <OIEJJAJCPELDHOOLFDLGEEDHCCAA.nymex2@unidial.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_001B_01C0DCAE.EFB7E340"
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Importance: Normal
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000

If  California businesses are to have any chance to avoid being forced to
endure  unbelievable rate increases under the CPUC plan, they must have
direct  access.? Subcommittee Chairman Barton has told us he supports DA, and
we  have several California congressmen considering introducing the DA
amendment at  this Friday's full committee markup.? Please contact ALL
members that you  can.? Mr. Radanovich, Mr. Ose, Mr. Lewis, Mr. Cox and Mr.
Shadegg(Arizona)  have all expressed positive interest, but none has given
the firm committment  necessary to introduce the amendment.? Use the
telephone, the fax, e-mail,  and any other method you can to convince the
members to push hard for DA in H.R.  1647.
?
Contact me with any questions.
?
Mark  Seetin
-----Original Message-----
From: Charlie DeWitt  [mailto:nymex4@unidial.com]
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 1:06  PM
To: Mark Seetin
Cc: Casey Beyer
Subject:  members information for amendment push

Energy and Air Quality Subcommittee

Republican Members?-- with their staffers in e-mail format

Full Committee Chairman Billy Tauzin (R-LA) David.Marventano@mail.house.gov
202-225-2927 fx225-1919

Chairman Joe Barton (R-TX), Andy.Black@mail.house.gov 202-225-2927  fx225-1919

Chris Cox (R-CA), Andy.Olson@mail.house.gov 225-5611 fx225-9177

Steve Largent (R-OK), Bob.Bolster@mail.house.gov 225-2211 fx225-9187

Richard Burr (R-NC), Brian.VanderBloemen@mail.house.gov 225-2071 fx  5-2995

Edward Whitfield (R-KY) Karen.Long@mail.house.gov 225-3115 fx 225-3547

Greg Ganske (R-IA), Doug.Stout@mail.house.gov , 225-4426 fx 225-3193

Charles Norwood (R-GA), Lem.Smith@mail.house.gov 225-4101 fx n/a

John M. Shimkus (R-IL), Ray.Fitzgerald@mail.house.gov 225-5271 fx5-5880

John Shadegg (R-AZ), Lance.Wenger@mail.house.gov 225-3361, fx 225-3462

Heather Wilson (R-NM), 225-6316 fx 225-4975

Ed Bryant (R-TN), 225-2811 fx225-2989

Chip Pickering (R-MS), 225-5031 fx 225-5797

George Radanovich (R-CA), 225-4540 fx 225-3402

Vito Fossella (R-NY), 225-3371 fx226-1272

Mary Bono (R-CA), Linda.Valter@mail.house.gov 225-5330 fx225-2961

Roy Blunt (R-MO), John.Dutton@mail.house.gov 225-6536 fx225-5604

Greg Walden (R-OR), 225-6730 fx225-5774

Lee Terry (R-NE), Mark.Anderson@mail.house.gov 225-4155 fx225-5452

Democrat Members

Rick Boucher (D-VA), Jody.Olson@mail.house.gov 225-3861 fx 225-0442

Ralph Hall (D-TX), Charles.Cooke@mail.house.gov 225-6673 fx225-3332

Tom Sawyer (D-OH), Joe.McGarvey@mail.house.gov 225-5231 fx225-5278

Albert Wynn (D-MD), Paul.Begey@mail.house.gov 225-8699 fx225-8714

Mike Doyle (D-PA), Sharon.Grant@mail.house.gov 225-2135 fx225-3084

Henry Waxman (D-CA), Greg.Dotson@mail.house.gov 225-3976 fx225-4099

Ed Markey (D-MA), Jeff.Duncan@mail.house.gov 225-2836 fx226-0092

Bart Gordon (D-TN), Louis.Finkel@mail.house.gov 225-4231 fx225-6887

Chris John (D-LA), Gordon.Taylor@mail.house.gov 225-2031 fx225-5724

Bobby Rush (D-IL), Nkosi.Bradley@mail.house.gov 225-4372 fx226-0333

Karen McCarthy (D-MO), Scott.Defife@mail.house.gov 225-4535 fx225-4403

Ted Strickland (D-OH), Michelle.Dallafior@mail.house.gov 225-5705  fx225-5907

Tom Barrett (D-WI), Ed.Walz@mail.house.gov 225-3571 fx225-2185

Bill Luther (D-MN), Steve.Heuer@mail.house.gov 225-2271 fx225-3368

CA Members not on subcommittee but on full committee:

Anna Eshoo (D-CA), Steven.Keenen@mail.house.gov 225-8104 fx225-8890

Lois Capps (D-CA), Randolph.Harrison@mail.house.gov 225-3601 fx225-5632

Jane Harman (D-CA), ("Hank") Henry.Dixon@mail.house.gov 225-8220  fx226-7290

Charlie DeWitt
Associate,  Government Affairs
New York Mercantile Exchange
1331 Pennsylvania Avenue,  NW? Suite 550-S
Washington, DC 20004
ph. (202) 662-8771
fax (202)  662-8765
nymex4@unidial.com
 - e&AQmembers.wpd


Sally - Thanks. I will bring some pictures with me when I come to Houston !

I have arranged to come over from the 14th to the 20th of March inclusive to
cover a number of things including some doorstep work. Will you have an hour
to see me sometime over this period ?

Patti - Could you please arrange for me to have the use of a desk for this
period ? I will bring my laptop so I will only need somewhere where I can get
hooked up.

Thanks James

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Sally Beck                           02/02/2001 20:36

To: James New/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Congratulations

I asked Mike this week if your baby was here, and he said that you had just
returned to the office.  Congratulations on the birth of your little girl.  I
hope that all three of you are surviving those first few weeks of adjustment
and that sleep is not too short a commodity in your house!   I will look
forward to seeing pictures of Lauren when I am next in London.  You do know
that now that you are a dad that it is a requirement to be armed with
adorable pictures at all times?!
--Sally


- MeadMktplace.xls


Twanda, I will have inserts to the two agreements for Bryce Baxter from this
document.  Michelle

----- Forwarded by Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT on 05/15/2000 10:35 AM -----

	Margo Terrell
	05/15/2000 10:04 AM

		 To: Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Ryan Seleznov/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Contingency Firm Agreement

Per our conversation, attached is the document that includes the liquidation
language.  Please let me know if you change it.  Thanks!


[IMAGE]
	Friday January 18, 2002	[IMAGE]
			[IMAGE]
			[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]		 RIGZONE [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] 	[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]		home    | news    | search    | maps    | data    | jobs    | market    | store  	[IMAGE]
			[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]		      [IMAGE] [IMAGE]      In This Issue [IMAGE]      [IMAGE]     [IMAGE]    Current Oil and Gas Industry News T! op Stories for the Past 7 Days Featured Events and Conferences What's in Store - Books & More     Featured Employment Opportunities Surplus Oilfield Equipment For Sale Worldwide Offshore Rig Utilization Oil & Gas Prices    [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]       Industry Headlines [IMAGE]      [IMAGE]       Latest Offshore Rig Activity  The worldwide mobile offshore rig count was up 4 for the week with 3 jackups and one semisub seeing new contracts.  CNOOC Jackup Leaves China  CNOOC secured the first contract for overseas service as an independent contractor in the international drilling market.    [IMAGE]     advertisement  A National-Oilwell designed, 1992 built modular offshore drilling rig is available for sale direct from the manufacturer.  This rig drilled only 5 wells from the Draugen platform in the Norwegian sector of the North Sea.  Click on the link below for full details, photos and seller contact information:   http://www.rigzone.com/market/surplus_listing.asp?eq_id=397            Exploration [IMAGE]      [IMAGE]     [IMAGE]  Celtic Resources To Farmout North Sea Licenses    Mustang Oil Ltd and Celtic Petroleum Ltd have entered a farmout agreement for their United Kingdom Seaward licences North Sea blocks 49/1c, 49/2b and 49/2c, to GDF Britain Ltd.  Conoco Focuses on Indonesia    Conoco expects to spend over $2.5 billion in Indonesia during the next nine years, as part of planned investment of $3.4 billion between 1998 and 2010.  Novus Petroleum Wins Padre Island Acreage   The Padre Island Project joint venture has been awarded drilling leases totaling 12,630 acres in the Padre Island area, in shallow waters offshore Texas.  Statoil and ExxonMobil Swap Norwegian Acreage  On January 1, 2002, Statoil took over operatorship and a 20 percent stake in the F-p! rospect of the Barents Sea from ExxonMobil.    [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]       Production [IMAGE]      [IMAGE]     [IMAGE]  Edison and BG Supply LNG to Gaz de France  Edison and BG will soon sign a 20-year agreement to supply Gaz de France with liquefied natural gas beginning in 2005.  Statoil Makes Record Gas Sales  On January 13, 2002, Statoil supplied a total of 137 million cubic meters of gas to customers in Europe beating the record set last winter.    [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]       Company & Financial News [IMAGE]      [IMAGE]     [IMAGE]  Enron To Select New Auditor    The Enron Corp. Board of Directors voted today to discharge Arthur Andersen as ! the company's auditor.  PGS Awarded $58 Million in New Contracts  Petroleum Geo-Services ASA announced that its onshore division has secured new seismic acquisition contracts in the United States, Ecuador, India and Bangladesh valued at $58 million.  Lukoil Announces New Directors  LUKOIL has nominated Mark Mobius and a leading ChevronTexaco executive to be independent directors.  Global Industries Announces Management Changes  Global Industries, Ltd. has appointed William J. Dore, Jr. to the position of Vice President - Investor Relations.   FTC Requests More Info from Phillips and Conoco  Phillips Petroleum Company and Conoco have both received requests from the Federal Trade Commis! sion for additional information.    [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]  advertisement   [IMAGE] Human Resources in Oil and Gas is the comprehensive HR forum for the industry. The conference will deal with attracting and retaining quality staff and dealing with the effects of mergers, acquisitions, and restructuring. This conference is a must for anyone involved in the often hectic human resources decisions of todays oil and gas companies. HR in Oil and Gas is being held in Aberdeen on February 27 and 28. Click here for more information.            Last 7 Days Top Stories [IMAGE]      [IMAGE]     [IMAGE]  Former Enron Execs Start New Company  Several former Enron senior executives have formed a new company to provide risk management services to the energy industry.  Anadarko Petroleum Provides 2002 Outlook  Anadarko Petroleum Corporation outlines its expectations for capital spending for 2002 and offers guidance on 2001 financial and operating results.  U.S. Approves Deepwater Royalty Relief  Gale Norton, Secretary of the Interior, announced that oil and gas companies drilling in Gulf of Mexico deepwater will be given royalty reductions.  National-Oilwell Acquires HALCO  National-Oilwell has acquired HAL Oilfield Pump & Equipment Company.  Anderson Employees ! Destroy Enron Documents  Andersen reports that individuals in the firm have disposed of a significant number of electronic and paper documents and correspondence relating to the Enron account  Venture To Begin Drilling Program on Sycamore Field  Venture Production will start drilling in May of this year at its Sycamore field in the UK Sector of the North Sea.  Statoil Sells First Oil From Girassol  Statoil has sold its first load of crude - one million barrels - from the TotalFinaElf-operated Girassol field offshore Angola.  Energy Partners Completes Hall-Houston Acquisition  Energy Partners, Ltd. has completed the acquisition of Hall-Houston and has elected Gary Hall, HHOC's founder, to the post of Vice-Chairman of EPL.  Shell and CNOOC Sign PSC Agreement  CNOOC and Shell Exploration China Limited signed a Production Sharing Contract for the exploration of the Bonan area of Bohai Bay.  Kongsberg Awarded Crazy Horse Project  Kongsberg Simrad has been awarded a contract for providing an integrated control and monitoring system to BP for the Crazy Horse PDQ semisub.  Talisman Expects to Spend $2 Billion in 2002  Talisman's 2002 budget for exploration and development is $2 billion which is a 6% increase over the 2001 budget.  Petronas and Bahrain Develop Offshore Exploration Program  Petronas and Bahraini officals met over the weekend to discuss a program for drilling offshore Bahrain.    [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]       Upcoming Oil & Gas Industry Events [IMAGE]      [IMAGE]     [IMAGE]  Jan. 22    Alliances and Partnering in Oil & Gas   Singapore Feb. 6     Torch Mid-Winter Energy Conference  New York Feb. 7     Marine Construction 2002  Houston Feb. 10    2002 SPE International Petroleum Conference & Exhibition in Mexico  Villahermosa Feb. 26    2002 IADC/SPE Drilling Conference and Exhibition   Dallas Feb. 26    Offshore Oil and Gas Safety Seminars  Aberdeen Feb. 27    Human Resources in Oil & Gas  Aberdeen Mar. 10    AAPG Annual Meeting  Houston Mar. 20    LNG North America  Houston Apr. 9     2002 SPE/ICoTA Coiled Tubing Conference and Exhibition  Houston  list your conference  view upcoming events   [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]    [IMAGE]    [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  Horizon Offshore  Global Completion Service  HoverDril  Baker Hughes   [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]   promote your company      [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  Well Completion and Servicing  [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  Mobile Drilling Units of the World CD-ROM  [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  Drilling Data Handbook, 7th Ed.  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]   more products   [IMAGE]      [IMAGE]    [IMAGE]  featured equipment: National 1320-UE  [IMAGE]   Wartsila Generator Sets  [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]      [IMAGE]   more equipment      [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   featured jobs:  - Mechanic  - Pipeline Technical Specialist - Advisor  - Wellhead-Christmas Tree Specialist   more hot jobs >>   featured candidates:  - Drilling Engineer  - Production & Workover Engineer  - Drilling Manager, Senior Drilling Engineer   search for candidates >>   [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]     [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   Drillships:  To 5000':   50.0% (7/14) +5000':   96.0% (24/25)  Semisubs:  2nd Gen:   67.1% (49/73) 3rd Gen:   86.0% (43/50) 4th Gen:   100.0% (38/38) 5th Gen:   100.0% (7/7)  Jackups:  To 200':   56.7%  (38/67) 200' MC:   50.0% (12/24) 200' MS:   14.3% (3/21) 300' IC: !   86.5% (83/96) +300' IC:   90.7% (49/54) Severe Env.:   81.0% (17/21)  [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]   view complete utilization report[IMAGE][IMAGE]Light Crude Oil: $18.10/BBL (-3.83%)Brent Crude Oil: $18.42/BBL (-5.44%)Natural Gas: $2.27/MMBtu (-5.81%)Unleaded Gasoline: $0.53/gal (-3.64%)prices from: 1/17/2002change since: 1/16/2002[IMAGE][IMAGE][IMAGE][IMAGE][IMAGE] Promotional OpportunitiesBecome a Sponsor, feature your job opening or, advertise your  upcoming industry conference.   Click here  for more information, send your press release to  info@rigzone.com  or call us at 281-345-4040.   Member Services If you no longer wish to receive this newsletter, you may unsubscribe by clicking here  or by logging in to Rigzone and updating your profile.   You can also change the format you receive (HTML or Text) and your email address by logging in and updating your account.   Click here to log in .

		[IMAGE]


Attached is a copy of the term sheet sent to Aquila Energy this morning
regarding the proposed transaction between ENA, Aquila Energy, and Onondaga
Cogeneration L.P..

The proposed transaction involves the refinancing of an existing financial
swap agreement between Onondaga and NIMO and the sale of ENA's existing cash
flow interest in Onondaga.

Call/see me to discuss.

Fred


spinnaker, one of fred's customer's , unwound a hedge today because they dont want exposure to us.


If you cannot read this email, please click here .

Earnings.com - ENE Upgrade/Downgrade History
Earnings.com 	[IMAGE]
	 [IMAGE] View Today's Upgrades/Downgrades/Coverage Initiated  Briefing  Enron Corp (ENE)       Date Brokerage Firm Action Details 10/22/2001  Prudential Securities  Downgraded to Hold  from Buy    10/19/2001  A.G. Edwards  Downgraded to Hold  from Buy    10/16/2001  Merrill Lynch  Upgraded to Nt Accum from Nt Neutral    10/09/2001  Merrill Lynch  Upgraded to Nt Neutral/Lt Buy from Nt Neutral/Lt Accum    10/04/2001  A.G. Edwards  Downgraded to Buy  from Strong Buy    09/26/2001  A.G. Edwards  Upgraded to Buy from Accumulate    09/10/2001  BERNSTEIN  Upgraded to Outperform from Mkt Perform    08/15/2001  Merrill Lynch  Downgraded to Nt Neut/Lt Accum  from Nt Buy/Lt Buy    06/22/2001  A.G. Edwards  Upgraded to Accumulate from Maintain Position    12/15/2000  Bear Stearns  Coverage Initiated at Attractive    07/19/2000  Paine Webber  Upgraded to Buy from Attractive    04/13/2000  First Union Capital  Upgraded to Strong Buy from Buy    04/13/2000  Salomon Smith Barney  Coverage Initiated at Buy    04/05/2000  Dain Rauscher Wessels  Upgraded to Strong Buy from Buy    04/05/2000  First Union Capital  Coverage Initiated at Buy      Briefing.com  is the leading Internet provider of live market analysis for U.S. Stock, U.S. Bond and world FX market participants.   ? 1999-2001 Earnings.com, Inc., All rights reserved  about us  | contact us  |  webmaster  | site map   privacy policy  | terms of service


About time.
"Doesn't David Freeman more properly belong in that same jail cell as the guy
called Spike than he does in the governor's office?" Johnson asked.

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854


Hey Dana I like these.

-----Original Message-----
From: Dana Davis [mailto:Dana.Davis@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2000 2:06 PM
To: kdavis2075@aol.com; cmontgomery@kmg.com; Lola Willis
Subject: FW:

---------------------- Forwarded by Dana Davis/HOU/ECT on 09/06/2000 01:42
PM
---------------------------

Rebecca Sanchez
09/06/2000 12:32 PM

To:   Dana Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rufino Doroteo/HOU/ECT@ECT,
pammy1030@webtv.net
cc:
Subject:  FW:

---------------------- Forwarded by Rebecca Sanchez/HOU/ECT on 09/06/2000
12:31
PM ---------------------------

Julie Torres <JTorres@franchiseconceptsinc.com> on 09/06/2000 12:23:53 PM

To:   Rebecca Sanchez <Rebecca.Sanchez@enron.com>, MyAngelADM@aol.com,
      sanchezma@simplexnet.com, "Ragusa, David" <RagusaD@simplexnet.com>
cc:
Subject:  FW:

Holy Humor - Seen in Churches Around the   Land...
"Fight truth decay - study the Bible daily."
"People are   like tea bags - you have to put them
in hot water before you know how strong   they are."

"Dusty Bibles lead to Dirty Lives":
"God so loved the   world that He did NOT send a committee."

"Come in and pray today. Beat   the Christmas rush!"

"When down in the mouth, remember Jonah. . .
He came out all right."
"How will you spend eternity?
Smoking or   Non-smoking?"
"If you're headed in the wrong direction,
God allows   U-turns."
"Come work for the Lord. The work is hard, the hours
  are   long and the pay is low. But the retirement benefits
are out of this   world!"

"Economic Forecast: It is unlikely there'll be a reduction
in the wages of sin."
"Do not wait for the hearse to take you to   church."
"If you don't like the way you were born,
try being born   again."
"Forbidden fruit creates many jams."
"In the dark? Follow   the Son."
"If you can't sleep, don't count sheep. . .
Talk to the   Shepherd

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.


Thanks,

I shall attend.

Vince Kaminski

	Tracy L Arthur

	12/20/2000 04:20:35 PM

To: Tracy L Arthur/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  (bcc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT)
Subject: Invitation...Welcome New Analyst Reception


seems crazy.  if you're willing to ride it for a few cents against you it's a
great trade.  who knows where they're going in th eshort term though

slafontaine@globalp.com on 12/01/2000 09:57:30 AM
To: John.Arnold@enron.com
cc:
Subject: re:summer inverses

johnnny-you think these inverses ready to get sold yet? to me its all a timing
issue but aug/oct at 4-5 cts seems rich rich for injection season. only issue
is
when to go?


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Spiller, Tina
Sent:	Wednesday, July 18, 2001 10:09 AM
To:	Beck, Sally; Brandli, Christina; Cannon, Lydia; Costello, Lisa; Cromwell, Sheri L.; Dayao, Anthony; Douglas, Stephen H.; Escamilla, Grisela; Flores-Cuellar, Brenda; Fuentes, Irma; Gros, Thomas D.; Jones, Robert W.- HR Exec; Jones, Susan; Kanellopoulos, Drew; Keiser, Holly; Palma, Viviana; Perlman, Beth; Richter, Brad; Roper, Kerry; Rub, Jenny; Shelby, Rex; Taylor, Mark E (Legal); Thompson, Patti; Valdez, Christina; Wax, Brandon; Weatherstone, Mary; Webb, Jay; Westbrook, Cherylene R.
Subject:	ENW Staff Meeting, July 19

REMINDER:

Thursday, July 19
ENW Staff Meeting
12:00 - 1:30 p.m.
EB27C2

National Dial-in 888-285-4585
International Dial-in 304-345-7354
Access Code 494963

_ [Taylor, Mark]  X __ I will attend in person.
___ I will not attend.
___ I will participate via conference call.

Thanks,

Tina Spiller
Assistant to Greg Piper
President & CEO
Enron Net Works LLC
Phone 713.853.5746
Fax 713.646.8070


this is becoming an increase concern, can we get together to discuss?
thanks,
Jeff
---------------------- Forwarded by Jefferson D Sorenson/HOU/ECT on
07/07/2000 08:51 AM ---------------------------

Jeff Johnson@ENRON
07/06/2000 06:14 PM
To: Ron Nolte/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dave Nommensen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jefferson D Sorenson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer Blay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob
Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Faxing

If this is becoming a serious issue we may want to get a quick meeting
together to determine a plan for resolving it. Based on Ron's analysis below,
it sounds like we need a determination if we can legally use another form of
technology for the confirm for high volume partners.

Email would be easiest to implement (perhaps with digital signatures that
were recently approved as legally binding by the courts) in the near term.
This, of course, will have to be prioritized against competing needs in the
DCAF area but at least we can do the analysis to know what the plan is.

Let us know.

Thank.s

Ron Nolte@ECT
07/06/2000 05:45 PM
To: Jefferson D Sorenson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jennifer Blay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, jeff johnson@enron

Subject: Faxing

Jeff,

In response to Jennifer and your inquiry, I looked at fax requests that
failed since June 28th.  I did some spot checking and
in lieu of doing an intense study, I came to the following conclusions.

1) Many requests fail ( No dial tone, No answer at Destination, cannot
identify remote unit, etc. ) because the fax machine is
 inoperable.  I dialed the same numbers at 4:30 p.m. and got a valid fax dial
tone.  The requests that failed for these
 reasons occurred at night, early morning, or on weekends.

2) A bunch fail because "Number dialed was busy", this implies someone else
was hitting their fax machine - we tried six times
 and gave up.

3) A bunch failed do to "Unexpected Disconnect".  This means that our machine
was talking to their machine and before
 out machine got back positive acknowledgment that the fax was received,
communication ended for some reason.

4) A number failed do to "Image Sub-system failed to render cover page",
This can be looked into and possibly resolved.

We are processing up to 2,000 fax requests per day.  A high percentage fail
when faxed at night, early morning, and weekends or do
to failure inherent in the faxing technology.  If we attempt to fax during
business hours, a fairly significant percentage of failures
will shift from item (1) to item (2), especially for high volume trading
parties.

I agree with others in looking at other solutions;  (1)  not faxing deals
done through EOL, (2) finding a more efficient method of communicating
deals to high volume trading partners.  This could include  E-mail to begin
with and evolve into Internet access and/or server to server communication.

It appears we are reaching the limit with the faxing technology.  Even if we
could shove more paper through - can the party on the other end
handle the volume - or do they just ignore it?

Thanks, Ron


I have not heard back from tommybomb or scott re: your bachelor party.  Maybe you would like to try them to see if they are going.
I need to book the cruise ASAP though.  So let me know.

-E


Jeff, Gas Daily has an article on DWR activities for purchasing gas.... do you know Pete Garris and is he the guy we want to get together with... or is Balwin's co. going to carry the ball. I remain unclear as to who actually is doing the gas buying..

Further to our conversation of last week... let's meet with these guys soonest.

BT


----- Forwarded by Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT on 08/14/2000 04:56 PM -----

	Roseann Engeldorf@ENRON
	08/09/2000 01:47 PM

		 To: Lisa Bills/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: "ROB TAYLOR" <TAYLR@andrews-kurth.com>
		 Subject: Coyote Springs Turbine Contract

Hello -

Attached for your review and comment are Rob's and Rose's changes to the
template contract.

Thanks,

Rose
---------------------- Forwarded by Roseann Engeldorf/Corp/Enron on
08/09/2000 01:46 PM ---------------------------

"ROB TAYLOR" <TAYLR@andrews-kurth.com> on 08/09/2000 12:42:47 PM
To: <Roseann.Engeldorf@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Coyote Springs Turbine Contract

Attached are (i) a revised, clean copy of the Coyote Springs Turbine
Contract, (ii) a blackline of the Contract showing the changes that I made,
and (iii) a rider containing provisions relating to the Purchaser Indemnity.

Please let me know if you have any questions or comments.

Regards,

Rob Taylor
Andrews & Kurth L.L.P.
Chase Tower
600 Travis Street
Suite 4200
Houston, Texas  77002

Tel:  (713) 220-4436
Fax:  (713) 238-7273

robtaylor@andrews-kurth.com

This e-mail (and any attachment(s) hereto) is intended only for use by the
addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or
confidential information.  If you are not the intended recipient of this
e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this e-mail (and any attachment(s) hereto) is strictly
prohibited.  If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately
notify me at (713) 220-4436 and permanently delete the original and any copy
of such e-mail and destroy any printout of such e-mail.

 - TurbineC.DOC
 - Ridersto.DOC
 - TurbineC.DOC


Andrea:
I just wanted to confirm that you received my revised draft of the ISDA
Schedule by fax last week.  If you didn't. let me know.  have the tax people
spoken with each other?

Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com


Also what about undergrads and taking them out to dinner? Etc.

Again,

Jeff

Jennifer Burns

12/01/2000 11:55 AM

To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Wharton Finance Conference

FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Jennifer Burns/HOU/ECT on 12/01/2000
11:55 AM ---------------------------
From: Michele Nezi Marvin@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS on 12/01/2000 11:42 AM
To: Marcia Manarin/SA/Enron@ENRON, Gisela Schwalm/SA/Enron@Enron, James M
Bannantine/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Kristin Gandy, Jennifer Burns/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alyse
Herasimchuk/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Wharton Finance Conference

Here are more details on the Finance Conference next Thursday and Friday,
Dec.  7 & 8, in Philadelphia.  On Thursday night there is a cocktail
reception for introduction of the panelists and networking with students.  It
is from 7-10 at the Park Hyatt Bellevue (same hotel where we are staying).
We have dinner reservations at 9pm to take the students who receive offers
from us to dinner at Le Bec Fin.  On Friday the conference begins at 9am
(breakfast/checkin is 8-9).  Your panel, Corporate Finance, is from 9-10:30.
Other panelists are Riccardo Guglielmetti - Dresdner Kleinwort Benson Equity
Capital, Brian Heese -  Merrill Lynch VP, Debt Capital Markets, Joel Van Duse
- Bank of America Co-head Consumer Products and Retail Investment Banking and
someone to be named from JP Morgan Chase.  Topics of discussion include the
state of the industry and critical issues, the impact of technology on
corporate finance, how capital markets and corporate finance interact with
the rest of Enron and career paths and profiles of individuals choosing this
sector.  For the last part I'll try to track down the career paths of a few
people to talk about.

I will be arriving in Philadelphia on Thursday afternoon.  We have already
reserved a hotel room for you and will send you the confirmation
information.  Will you be coming from Houston or Sao Paulo?

I look forward to meeting you next week.

Michele Nezi Marvin
Manager
Enron Broadband Services
(713)853-6848


Listened in on the analyst call this morning.  Here are my notes.  Did not yet have a chance to organize them, so they're simply in chronological order.

The call began with Watson, Bergstrom, and Whalley reading from prepared statements.  Watson spoke for c. 10 minutes, Bergstrom for 5, and Whalley spoke for perhaps 30 seconds.  Dynegy management was noticeably in control of the call.  Enron executives spoke when questions were directed to them.

Specific points:
EES will be a part of the new company.
Enron assets will be revalued at closing.
The investment in Northern Natural takes the form of convertible preferred.  If the merger does not go through, Dynegy has the right to acquire Northern for 'very little' additional consideration.  If DYN terminates the merger and ENE 'has sufficient liquidity', ENE has right to repurchase the convertible preferred.
Debt/equity of combined company expected to be <45%.
Both companies will remain on RatingsWatch negative.
ChevronTexaco will hold 169MM shares out of a total 650MM shares of the post-merger entity.
Watson reiterates that going forward, the new entity will be run with a focus on transparent and clear financial structure and disclosure, with a significant reduction in on- and off-balance-sheet leverage.
In what was termed a "new approach", the new entity will be run with a focus on cash flow rather than earnings.
Rumors that Dynegy did the deal because of an unhedged exposure to Enron are not true.  Dynegy owed Enron <$50MM.
Lay says that Enron had other options, 'particularly financial'.
All of the discussion and activity has taken place over the last two weeks.
Lay acknowledges that the number for exposure to securities lawsuits may be 'pretty big', but that the companies feel they're able to appropriately value this exposure.
Lay says we have nothing else to hide, but internal investigation still under way.
Lay:  had the SPEs been capitalized with perhaps $30MM more of risk capital, there would have been no question that they would have qualified for off-balance-sheet treatment and there would have been no need to restate earnings last week to reflect consolidation of the SPEs.
Dynegy says that 'several' internal investigations continue at Enron, and thus DYN/ENE cannot say with certainty that there's absolutely nothing else out there.
Doty (Dynegy CFO) says that late last week, ENE had 'close to a billion' in cash.
Osprey will be unwound late next summer. Marlin will be unwound after closing.
Many of the off-balance-sheet structures, including the credit-linked notes, are expected to be unwound/redeemed or at least significantly reduced prior to closing.
With regard to ENE asset dispositions, these will be accelerated to the extent possible.  However, Doty says that 'our backs are not against the wall', and the company will continue to focus on getting value for its assets as well as cash.
ENE will renew its 364-day facility (believe this is the $3Bn facility that we drew down a couple of weeks ago) within the next 6-8 weeks.
BBB-flat most likely rating for combined entity, according to initial comments from ratings agencies.
McMahon says 'no comment' to WSJ article indicating that ENE's banks are preparing to make an equity infusion into ENE in the next few weeks.
Consolidation of trading activity: Mid- and back-office consolidation will see substantial progress prior to closing, such that only the front office / trading books will need to be combined at closing.  EES, NNG and TW have no real overlap with existing DYN activity, so there won't be much integration work required there.  The big integration effort will be ENA.
Watson says that the 'creative financing' surrounded non-core assets.  Doty adds that, 'frankly', DYN assigned zero economic value to non-core businesses in their valuation model.  They bracketed the maximum expected exposure from the non-core assets/businesses and left it at that.
Watson mentions that DYN would not have gotten involved with Enron had they not been approached by 'Enron's top three executives', who said that they thought a combination with Dynegy made the most strategic sense for both companies.  Says that their approach evidenced a  willingness to work with DYN to integrate the two companies that made a big difference in Dynegy's deliberations on proceeding with the merger.
Watson/Doty said that they're NOT 100% sure that no surprises remain in Enron's books--but that the risk/reward offered by the combination was compelling.
The deal does have material-adverse-change outs for Dynegy, covering any MAC regarding Enron's assets or businesses.  Dynegy's lawyers indicated that the MAC language was a 'blunt instrument' under which it would be difficult to bring a case, so Dynegy inserted a specific paragraph that gives Dynegy the right to terminate the merger if the Enron's total legal liability (from any source or cause of action) tops $3.5Bn prior to closing.
McMahon adds that there 'could' be more restatements, but he 'does not expect' there to be more restatements.
ENE international hard assets definitely on the asset disposition list.
The merger structure calls for a new entity to take over Enron.
Enron is planning to hold an Enron-specific conference call in the next few days, tentatively scheduled for Wednesday.
Initial reaction of ratings agencies 'very positive' to combined entities.
McMahon acknowledges that Enron would have had to have an additional equity infusion prior to year-end, had the merger not materialized.
Dynegy's earnings guidance places Enron-related earnings accretion at $0.90-0.95, which represents a '25% haircut' to Enron internal estimates.  Doty says that this is all operating earnings--figure does not include any amounts from expected synergies.
Doty says that both Enron and Dynegy's books, as far as he understands, are relatively short-term in weight, and this will continue to be the weighting of the new entity.  Says a 'very very substantial' portion of future trading earnings will be expected to be cash.
ChevronTexaco's investment in Dynegy was calculated at a 5% discount to public prices on the date of negotiation (not disclosed).  Given the runup in Dynegy stock last week, ChevronTexaco's investment is now at a 'more substantial' discount to market prices.  ChevronTexaco has provision to get 'different prices at closing if those prices are substantially better'.  (No further clarification given).
Whalley believes that 'we'll retain' the Enron traders and marketers. They're used to being part of a winning team, and the combined entity will definitely be a winner.  They have talked with most of the Enron business leaders, and they are 'very excited' by the combination.  They will be working with the Enron business leaders to ensure talent is retained.  Whalley was asked if there will be any key employee retention provisions.  He says that 'to the extent necessary, yes.'
Watson says that the trading strategy of the combined entity will be a combination of DYN and ENE--there will be more of an asset-backed trading focus, but by the same token the new Dynegy will be involved in much more financial market-making trading than the Dynegy of today.
Watson says that if there were to be any change in culture, he's a strong team player.  He does not want to see an individual do well if the company or division does not do well.

Give me a call if you'd like me to try to clarify any of these comments.

Patrick Tucker
x3-3055