Welcome to Enron Center South. As you have probably already noticed, things look a little different here. We wanted to orientate you to your new environment and inform you about the future technology coming on-line in the coming weeks.

Occupancy Guidebook To Enron Center South
You will find this handy guide on your desk; it contains information concerning the enhanced printer environment, the new easy access keyboards and telephony procedures.

NEC Monitors
The NEC monitors have an internal anti-glare screen to help reduce eye strain and eliminate the need to install an additional screen cover.  Additionally, an integrated speaker has been installed on one monitor for each desk.

Turret Users
An "Alliance MX turret quick reference guide" has been placed on your desk; this includes important information about the new features such as "Caller ID" and "Voicemail Indication".

Increased Information Access
There are many NEC 50" Plasma screens installed on the 5th and 6th floors.  While many of these will be displaying information designed for the specific unit, others will be displaying various television channels.  The audio to these television channels can be accessed via any of your telephony equipment.  Here's how:

Ten audio channels have been set up for access from your either your Avaya telephone, Stentophon, or IPC Turret.  The channels have been defined on Page 15 of your Turret.  To access the audio from either your Avaya or Stentophon, simply dial the extensions shown in the table below:

Channel	Avaya	Stentophon
Weather Channel	12401	801
CNN Headlines News	12402	802
CNN Financial News	12403	803
CNBC	12404	804
MSNBC	12405	805
Bloomberg	12406	806
Financial News Network	12407	807
CNN	12408	808
Fox Sports	12409	809
ESPN1	12410	810

Wireless Telephony
You may notice the cellular phone coverage is not consistent across the floor, and some areas have virtually no coverage at all.  We are implementing a multi-network "in-building" system to provide consistent high quality service for the campus, keeping you in touch while you are on the move.

Wireless LAN
The infrastructure to support Wireless LAN technology is in place and is being tested. We will be implementing multi level encryption and security to keep our intellectual property safe from eavesdroppers or hackers.

Amtel Replacement
As a move to provide a more flexible "Plug n Play" environment and to help with the reduced desk footprint, we have replaced the Amtel message boxes with Microsoft Exchange Instant Messaging. The Global Messaging Team is testing additional software products to provide some of the features not available with Exchange Instant Messaging; these include one-touch response keys, external LED display, and printing.  Updates will be provided as they become available.

Keeping an Open forum
We will keep you informed of the changes and developments as the migration to the building continues, please feel free to respond with any comments, queries or suggestions to  mailto:Enron.Center.South.Technology@enron.com


----- Forwarded by Kenny Maltby/Bakersfield/Eott on 02/15/2001 07:28 AM
-----

                    Kenny Maltby
                                         To:     l.campbe@enron.com,
                    02/15/2001           john.shafer@enron.com,
rich.jolly@enron.com,
                    07:21 AM             scott.jones@eott.com
                                         cc:
                                         Subject:     Endangered Species

Here is an article from our local paper on endangered species you might be
interested in.

http://www.bakersfield.com/local/Story/306974p-305742c.html


It looks like only leg 4 had firm energy - I changed that to CAISO. Legs 2
and 3 already had CAISO energy, and leg 1 is killed. Is that okay?

Kate

	From:  Sharen Cason                           03/09/2001 07:01 AM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Stewart Rosman/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: NCPA deal #541645

These two legs are entered with NP-15 delivery points with firm energy.  Let
me know if this is correct.

Thanks!


In yet another Order issued yesterday (see attached), FERC rejects the request by Con Edison to extend the Revised Localized Market-Power Mitigation Measures (Revised LMM)* until October 31, 2002. The Revised LMM had been approved by FERC on July 20  (on rehearing after initially rejected them on May 16), but were required in that Order to expire on October 31, 2001. FERC denies Con Ed's requested extension because it was "procedurally improper," and directs the NYISO to address FERC's concerns regarding the revised LMM as part of the comprehensive mitigation proposal FERC required the NYISO to prepare by March 1 in its AMP extension order also issued yesterday. (An email regarding that Order has been sent to you separately.) In particular, FERC wants to know how the revised LMM will work in conjunction with other mitigation measures in effect or proposed; whether the mitigation is designed to apply only in must-run situations or more broadly and why; whether market conditions in NYC warrant structural triggers for market power mitigation; and whether in-city mitigation measures should apply to all generation in the City or just to the units divested by Con Edison. FERC again directs the NYISO to consider mitigation measures used by PJM and ISO-NE to aid in the transition to a Northeast RTO. Finally, FERC directs Con Ed and the NYISO to make a filing that removes all in-city mitigation measures from Con Ed's tariff and puts them into the ISO's tariff. Significantly, FERC directs the NYISO to address in that filing, "and remedy to the extent required in NYISO's tariff and in the operations of NYISO and ConEd, allegations...that ConEd currently has operational responsibility for the New York City transmission grid and can direct out-of-merit dispatch. Ultimate responsibility for such functions, if not hands-on operational control, must lie with NYISO rather than ConEd." Elimination of ConEd's ability to dispatch units out-of-merit is crucial to the proper functioning of the markets in New York City. Development of the comprehensive market mitigation plan called for in both this and the AMP order by March 1 is going to be an enormous and time consuming undertaking for the NYISO and market participants over the next three months.
----------------
* The Revised LMM expanded the application of the LMM approved by FERC in 1998 as part of Con Ed's generation divestiture proposal to: (1) bids for sale of energy in the real time markets during constrained periods; (2) bids for min gen and start-up whenever gen must be operated out-of-merit due to local reliability requirements; (3) bids for start-up and min gen during constrained periods (i.e., whenever mitigation would apply to a unit's incremental energy bid); and (4) all generators located electrically within NYC, not just those divested by Con Edison.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lauren Mildren [mailto:lmildren@bracepatt.com]
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 2:24 PM
To:	Andrea Settanni; Yeung, Charles; cnicola@enron.com; Fulton, Donna; hfromer@enron.com; snovose@enron.com; Lindberg, Susan
Subject:	ER01-1385 ConEd v. NYISO -- Special Market Power MitigationMeasures for NYC


This is the turbine contract to print and put on your desk.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/07/2001 04:38
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Chris Booth                           01/02/2001 05:03 PM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Blue Dog

Kay,

Here is the electronic version of the Blue Dog Max contract.  Do I get any
bonus points for this???

Chris
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Booth/NA/Enron on 01/02/2001 04:58
PM ---------------------------
From: Brian D Barto@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 01/02/2001 04:54 PM
To: Chris Booth/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Blue Dog

This should get you up to speed as far as available electronic docs can.


Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Return-Path: <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
Received: from  rly-ye02.mx.aol.com (rly-ye02.mail.aol.com [172.18.151.199])
by air-ye02.mx.aol.com (v73.12) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 May 2000 18:05:21 -0400
Received: from  postmaster.enron.com (outbound5.enron.com [192.152.140.9]) by
rly-ye02.mx.aol.com (v71.10) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 May 2000 18:05:02 -0400
Received: from mailman.enron.com (mailman.enron.com [192.168.189.66]) by
postmaster.enron.com (8.8.8/8.8.8/postmaster-1.00) with ESMTP id RAA16047 for
<vkaminski@aol.com>; Fri, 12 May 2000 17:05:02 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from dserv1.ect.enron.com (dserv1.ect.enron.com [172.16.1.37]) by
mailman.enron.com (8.8.8/8.8.8/corp-1.03) with ESMTP id RAA03182 for
<vkaminski@aol.com>; Fri, 12 May 2000 17:04:51 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from notes.ect.enron.com (ecthou_gt2.corp.enron.com [172.16.4.33])
by dserv1.ect.enron.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id RAA27377 for
<vkaminski@aol.com>; Fri, 12 May 2000 17:05:00 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by notes.ect.enron.com(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.5  (863.2 5-20-1999))
id 862568DD.00794B9A ; Fri, 12 May 2000 17:04:52 -0500
X-Lotus-FromDomain: ECT
From: "Vince J Kaminski" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
To: vkaminski@aol.com
Message-ID: <862568DD.00794A86.00@notes.ect.enron.com>
Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 17:04:47 -0500
Subject: Conference May 31 on Energy Derivatives in Toronto
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Mailer: Unknown

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 05/12/2000
05:07
PM ---------------------------

Phelim Boyle <pboyle@uwaterloo.ca> on 05/12/2000 03:47:59 PM

To:   Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com, Amy Aldous <aaldous@watarts.uwaterloo.ca>,
      pconcessi@deloitte.com, ROSS Raymond -CMMRCL OPS
      <raymond.ross@ontariopowergeneration.com>
cc:
Subject:  Conference May 31 on Energy Derivatives in Toronto

 Vince
Thanks again for agreeing to speak at our conference.
It is attracting considerable interest. .

Is it possible for you to send us copies of your slides by May 18 to meet our
deadline for
preparing the material.? If you have? a related paper available that covers
some of the same material that would do instead but
naturally we would prefer the slides.

I would like to mention again the?? the pre-conference dinner at
7 pm on Sunday May 30 for the speakers
We hope very much you can be present

I was also hoping you would be available for the last? session of the day to
be
panel member
The provisional title? is
Managing Risk in Illiquid Markets
The chair is Pat Concessi of Deloitte and Touche
The panel last from 3.30 until 4.30 and we would like panel members should
speaker for
a few minutes and take questions from the floor.

In the meantime if you have any questions please let Amy or myself know

Sincerely
Phelim P Boyle

--
Phelim P Boyle
Director
Centre for Advanced Studies in Finance,
University of Waterloo,
Waterloo, Ontario
Canada N2L 3G1

Tel? 519 885 1211(6513)
Fax 519 888 7562


Our recommendations on possible FERC Commissioners for Ken's next discussion
with Cheney.
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 12/19/2000 10:27 AM -----

	Allison Navin
	12/19/2000 08:57 AM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: FERC Commissioner

Per your request.


We're almost ready - a few more minutes
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 06/14/2000 03:04 PM -----

	"Rosenblum, Gary(CICG-GEDNY)" <grosenbl@exchange.ml.com>
	06/14/2000 02:56 PM

		 To: "'sara.shackleton@enron.com'" <sara.shackleton@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Confidentiality

 - Doc5_.doc


I'll be happy to accomodate.  I can take you through Enron's view of how
markets overall are evolving and how we approach those markets.  I'd also
like to spend some time reviewing interstate transmission policy and how it
affects Western energy markets.

"Steve Reynolds" <SREYNO@state.wy.us> on 05/23/2001 09:40:11 AM
To: <skean@enron.com>
cc: <sland@enron.com>

Subject: Wyoming Energy Commission subject

Steve, it was great to meet you and hear your remarks yesterday.  For the
speaking engagement next Wednesday, I would like you to focus upon the Enron
strategic model of virtual integration of market forces in the evolution of
energy development.  Wyoming represents a huge material resource base and the
commission is charged with the development and promotion of such.  But the
Governor's message is that we cannot see ourselves as producers and exporters
in the traditional sense.  We will continue to have the status of a colony if
we do not recognize the new dynamics of how these market places are
evolving.  If you set the stage with a presentation of Enron strategy, then
we will discuss how a state, with its agencies and auathority can play a role
in this evolution.  I have set your time for 45 minutes, which can include a
short Qand A period.  But your message can be as succint as you can make it
and get the point across.  You may have to present the Enron case a number of
different ways, but the Governor will give you latitude to make the point.
You will be welcome to participate in a following panel which will address
role playing by the state and the commission.  Plan to join us for lunch.  If
you need more detail, let me know.  Thanks!  Stephen


Gerry, this is too cryptic for me -- what was decided?  I'd like to go to the
next meeting!  Thanks.  Michelle

Gerry Gibson@ENRON
10/06/2000 10:56 AM
To: Drew C Lynch/LON/ECT@ECT, Neil Davies/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bruce Van
Cleve/HOU/EES@EES, Pam Butler/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robert
Jones/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Andrea Yowman/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bob
Sparger/Corp/Enron@Enron, Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary
Joyce/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Michael Feuerbacher/Corp/Enron@Enron, Felecia
Acevedo/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David Oxley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tim
O'Rourke/Corp/Enron@Enron, Brian Schaffer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Hilda Bourgeois-Galloway/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rhonna Palmer/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Rachael Adams/LON/ECT@ECT, Norma Yeverino/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Org. Hierarchy Next Steps

Hello Folks:

I wanted to quickly follow-up with a note on the Next Steps we agreed to this
morning. We will distribute the balance of the meeting notes shortly. If I
missed anything in the translation, please let us know... Thanks, Gerry G.

Key Next Steps            Who / When

Solicit Cindy Olson's help lining up McKinsey Consultant's (Suzanne)
participation  David O. / 10-6

2. Convene small group that was present this morning and McKinsey      Gerry
G. / by 10-17
Consultant to further define philosophical direction and a high level snap
shot
of the new and improved organizational model

3. Present high level model to Cindy. Prepare her to run by Jeff S.     Team
/ by 10-27

4. Present to Jeff S. - make decision on go or no go       Cindy O by 11-1

5. If decision is a go - convene more comprehensive team meeting to further
define model  Team by 11-15
and implementation plan


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Booth/NA/Enron on 03/14/2001 11:15
AM ---------------------------

"Young, Michael" <Michael.Young@northwestern.com> on 03/14/2001 11:16:17 AM
To: "'chris.booth@enron.com'" <chris.booth@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Northwestern Offer Letter

Chris, prior to our call this afternoon, I wanted to alert you to one term
that was discussed in our Monday telephone call that I inadvertently left
out of the letter you received yesterday.  Specifically, we would want the
Enron carry to continue until September 1, 2001.  Thus, Northwestern would
be obligated to close on the transaction (and get Enron its money) on or
before this date.  Again, this specific term was discussed in the Monday
call and left out of the letter.  I apologize for the oversight.  Let me
know if this is a problem.


Once again, it's time to find out what you think about your work experience
at Enron and what we can do to help make it better.  That's why we want to
check your pulse.  In fact, we've changed the name of last year's "Excellence
Through Communication" employee survey to The Pulse.  We believe The Pulse
more accurately captures the purpose of the survey.  Your diagnosis will help
us correct problem areas so we can continue to make Enron a great place to
work.

Is available:  Monday, October 16 ) Friday, Oct. 27
Is located at: survey.enron.com

There are a few things we want you to remember about The Pulse:

1. Your survey responses will be confidential.  You can complete your survey
at your desktop or at special computer kiosks that are set up in some of our
larger offices.  Several group computer terminals also will be available in
smaller field offices.  We want to provide you with the most comfortable
environment possible, as your participation is of vital importance to us.
2. We will respond actively to your comments.  We are going to do our best to
cure some of the current problems that exist and put into action preventative
processes that will help identify smaller problems before they become major
ones.  We may ask for your help in resolving some of the issues that are
collected in the survey ) your active role will help us identify the best
solutions.
In last year's survey, you identified several problem areas regarding
internal communications and we've already acted on many of your
recommendations.  These are a few of the things we've accomplished or are
working on in direct response to your input:
1. Require all executives (VP and above) to attend the Executive Impact &
Influence course, which is a 360-degree program designed to improve
leadership and communication skills.  By year-end, more than 90 percent will
have attended this course, with the remaining 10 percent to be trained in the
first quarter of 2001.
2. Offer all employees online communication courses.  These courses will be
available in the first quarter of 2001.
3. Improve our online communication tools, beginning in the fourth quarter,
2000:
   w Simplify and standardize Enron directories
   w Educate all employees about the availability and usage of IT tools.
   w Promote intelligent/responsible use of email.
4. Introduce Participation & Dissent (P&D) sessions to provide a vehicle for
solving problems, addressing issues and developing new opportunities.  This
application will launch in the first quarter of 2001 in the ThinkBank on
eThink.

So take a few minutes to check your pulse and tell us what you think and how
you feel about your job and about Enron.


thank you.

Doug Arnell@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
10/10/2000 01:20 PM
To: Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Miller@ENRON, Colleen Sullivan@ECT,
Eric Groves@ECT, Ned E Crady/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman@ECT, Julie A Gomez@ECT
Subject: Re: Bahamas LNG Terminal

This meeting has been changed to 2:30-3:30 pm, Thursday, October 12.

Thanks

Scott Neal@ECT
10/10/2000 11:00 AM
To: Doug Arnell/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: Re: Bahamas LNG Terminal

Doug,

I am not available until 2:30pm.  Is it possilble to push back the start?

Doug Arnell@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
10/10/2000 10:15 AM
To: Scott Neal@ECT, Stephanie Miller@ENRON, Colleen Sullivan@ECT, Eric
Groves@ECT, Ned E Crady/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman@ECT, Julie A Gomez@ECT
Subject: Bahamas LNG Terminal

This is to confirm a meeting on Thursday, Oct. 12, from 2-3 pm regarding the
Bahamas/South Florida LNG Project.  The meeting will take place in Mike
McConnell's office (EB3328).

Scott Neal will join the meeting at 2:30 pm.

Thanks


Please advise if you have the Financial Derivatives - Canada binder.

Thank you,
Taffy


Here is the latest margin rate change -
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 12/06/2000 04:19 PM -----

	exchangeinfo@nymex.com
	12/04/2000 02:08 PM

		 To: sara.shackleton@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: (00-414) Margin Rate Change for Natural Gas

Notice No. 00-414
December 04, 2000

TO:
ALL NYMEX MEMBERS AND MEMBER FIRMS
ALL NYMEX CLEARING FIRMS
ALL NYMEX OPERATIONS MANAGERS

FROM: Neal Wolkoff, Executive Vice President

SUBJECT: MARGIN RATE CHANGE

Effective Date: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 (close of business)

Futures Contract: Henry Hub Natural Gas Futures

Contract Months: All Months

Rate Change:
NYMEX Division Margins on Henry Hub Natural Gas Futures Contracts
Effective Date: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 (close of business)

Clearing Member (Maintenance Margin): Old: $7,500  New: $10,000
Member Customer (Initial Margin): Old: $8,250  New:  $11,000
Non-Member Customer (Initial Margin): Old: $10,125  New:  $13,500

Should you have any questions regarding these changes, please contact Arthur
McCoy at (212) 299-2928 or Joe Sanguedolce at (212) 299-2855.  This notice
supersedes all previous notices regarding outright margins for the NYMEX
Henry Hub Natural Gas Futures Contract.

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"
http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=sara.shackleton@enron.com&r
efdoc=(00-414)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


Attached please find the EPMI Power Credit Watch List as of 01/08/01.  Please
direct any questions and/or comments to the Credit Hotline (713-853-1803).

Thank you,
Veronica Gonzalez


Good morning.

Further to Steve's comments below, I am also wondering what the new language
in the Assignment of Interests adds or is intended to add beyond the
language in the prior paragraph 2.  Are there obligations of VLDC outside
the Haywood LLC that are intended to be assigned by the new language?  If
so, then as Steve suggests, we need to make sure that AES knows what the
universe includes and gets related reps and warranties.  The reps and
warranties under the SPA reach only to the obligations of Haywood.

Thanks

Audrey.
-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Hase [mailto:shase@aesc.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 8:27 AM
To: aroffwarg@bracepatt.com; prollin@aesc.com; aroffwarg@bracepatt.com;
cthompson@bracepatt.com; szisman@ect.enron.com; ben.f.jacoby@enron.com;
chris.booth@enron.com; fred.mitro@enron.com; kay.mann@enron.com;
alouison@hunton.com
Subject: Assignor's Obligations -- Due Dligence

Ben and Aaron,

We note in the Assignment of Interest document sent yesterday, there is a
new section 2, whereby AES would be assuming all of the obligations of
Volunter Land Development Company.

We need to perform due diligence on what those obligations are and whether
they have changed since the SPA was executed.  We need the following
information for determining what obligations VLDC has incurred:

1)  financial statements of the LLC
What debts does the LLC owe and to whom?
2)  list of all the agreements entered into by the company
(to my knowledge, there is the system impact study agreemt with TVA
Any other agreements with TVA, like a Keep Whole letter?
3)  copies of any new agreements not already delivered in the Binder dated
Nov 2000?
4)  any tax agreements with the County or any other public entity?
5) any amendments to your land option agreements with Mann or English?

I'd appreciate your review of these matters as soon as possible to keep
our scheduled closing on track.

I'll be meeting with Ben at 8:00CT.  Our call remains at 2:00PM CT same #
as before.

Steve Hase


Pets In the Office
 It's A Growing Trend

 In the dog-eat-dog world of business, there's a growing trend at some
companies. Workers are bringing their
 pets to the office.

 Chip Paucek, who produces educational videos and television programs, has
been taking his golden retriever,
 Hoss, to work for the last five years. Paucek and Hoss visited The Early
Show and talked with Co-Anchor
 Jane Clayson.

 The dog has became the office mascot, says Paucek. "He brings a lot of
emotion and people love it. He's
 very relaxed."

 But Paucek, as co-president of his company, has the freedom to bring Hoss to
the office if he wishes. Not
 everybody can bring their pet to work.

 "A lot of it depends on the dog," says Paucek, who explains that Hoss is not
a rowdy dog.

 "He just hangs out," explains Paucek. "He's easy to get along with."

 Hoss has free rein at the office. When Paucek is away on trips, "My wife
brings him in and drops him off at
 the office," Paucek says.

 While there are plenty of positives to pets in the workplace, there are also
many legal issues to consider. John
 Challenger, CEO of an international placement company, agrees that the trend
of bringing pets to the work
 place is really growing.

 "More and more companies in this tight labor market are trying to make their
working place
 employee-friendly and many are looking at bringing pets into the workplace,"
says Challenger

 He points out, however, that there are serious issues that employers and
employees need to explore before
 they adopt a pets-in-the-office policy.

 "One of the things that the companies must do, before they jump into a
policy like that, is take a poll
 of their employees and find out what they're thinking. If you have certain
employees that don't feel
 comfortable with pets, you might want to rethink the policy."

 There are liability questions as well. For example, the company might be
liable if a dog or cat bites or
 scratches another employee.

 "The company ought to talk with their attorneys before they put this kind of
policy in effect," says
 Challenger. "The employee needs to understand that if their dog bites
someone or the cat scratches
 someone, it can't be the company's fault."

 Allergies are a major deterrent to bringing cats to the office.

 "Many people are allergic to cat hair. You have to think, as an employer,
will you put them in a
 certain part of your space. What about people who are afraid of animals?
Many don't feel
 comfortable with them around. Just how many do you want? Do you want cats
and dogs and what
 about birds? What about the noise of birds?"

 Paucek admits that when there's more than one pet in the office, "It gets
chaotic."

 In 1997, the American Animal Hospital Association surveyed 1,225 pet owners.
They found that:

      21% of those surveyed had taken their pets to work
      76% feel guilty about leaving their pets at home while they're on the
job
      33% said they leave a TV or radio on for their animals

 If a company decides to allow pets in the office, they should:

      poll employees before they let the pets come
      provide a written policy about pets and list which pets are not welcome
in the office
      establish an off-limits-to-pets area
      make sure employees bring documents proving pets are vaccinated
      bar noisy, destructive, or messy animals from the office
      tell employees to keep control of their animals at all times

 If many employees want to bring their pets to the office, the company should
make a rotating schedule.

 When the pets-in-the-office policy does work, it's great. Paucek says when
he and Hoss arrive at work, "I get
 off the elevator. He goes one way and I go the other. He says hello to the
employees. He has his own
 web page."


Hello all!

I am in the process of making the arrangements for a new hire dinner, to take place on Thursday, April 26th (possibly on Wed, April 25th). Could you please let me know if you will be available to attend? Dinner will most likely be around 6pm at either the Heathman, or Oritalia at the Westin.

The following is a list of new hires that will be invited:

Fredrik Ericksson,
Crystal Hyde
Eric Linder
Steven Merriss
Craig Dean
Glenn Surowic

Please let me know by close of business tomorrow whether or not you will be available to attend. I will be sending out invitations to the new hires early next week.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Regards,
Grace


I certainly will, I know you can't wait to go home and begin your life!!!!


Greg and Mark:

Attached is a draft of the very short story that will accompany your profiles in Enron Business. (PR management has approved.)  The purpose is simply to introduce you and quickly address the issue that's on everyone's mind, the stock price.  Please review your individual quotes and let me know if you have any revisions as soon as possible.  The quotes were extracted from your interviews with us a few weeks ago.  If I have not heard back from you by the end of the day tomorrow, I'll assume it's OK to print as is.  Thanks again for taking the time to meet with us.

Warm regards and cheers,
Sarah Palmer
Internal Communications Manager
Enron Public Relations
(713) 853-9843


Hey Ben,

Finally getting settled in, here's my new info:

3842 Jewell St K303
San Diego, 92109
home 858-483-2641
work 619-652-5477
cell 858-349-8312

Enjoy the MV trip.  Get in touch if you're ever in
town.

Pete

--- Benjamin.Rogers@enron.com wrote:
> Peter:
> Gppd tp hear from you.  Congrats on heading out to
> CA - thats great.  I
> know that you been wanting to head west for some
> time now.  Work is going
> well, I'm in the power trading group, trading MW's.
> I'm visiting my folks
> up in the Vineyard in the beginnning of August, so
> it will be good to hang
> out up East.  I haven't seen Derek lately, I know he
> is in H town, working
> for the summer.  Well, good luck with moving out
> west and keep in touch.
> Talk to you soon.
> Ben
>
>     -----Original Message-----
>    From:   "Pete Loncto" <pdl8@cornell.edu>@ENRON
>
>
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Pete+20Loncto+22+20+3Cpdl8+40cornell+2Eedu+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
>
>
>    Sent:   Thursday, July  5, 2001 5:48 PM
>    To:     Rogers, Benjamin
>    Subject:
>
>    Ben!
>    Whats happening down in HOuston?  Got some big
> news on my end - I am
>    moving
>    out to San Diego to start a job with
> Nicholas-Applegate Capital
>    Management.
>    I've been on vaca, working on my golf game and
> tan since graduating
>    Cornell
>    in May and move out this week.  Looking forward
> to the job and the
>    lifestyle - I'll be living a few blocks from the
> beach and never have to
>    see
>    snow again!  I'll send along full contact info
> once I get fully settled
>    in a
>    couple of weeks.  COme visit if you are ever out
> that way.  Hope all is
>    well.
>    Pete
>
>
>
>

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
http://phonecard.yahoo.com/


Thanks.  I think the one dimension that I would like to see addressed a bit
more explicitly is:  If the interest in the holding company itself is
transferred, or the management control of the holding company changes hands,
e.g., "Enron Corp." (old) is no longer chaired by Lay, who will chair "Enron
Corp. (new)", but Enron Corp. (old) still is the JV interest owner, in
addition to the legal requiriements, and consultation with locals you note
below, is there any risk of "political" interference, such that they might
extract concessions from the parties to the transaction before it could go
forward.  Not necessarily fair, but they might have some leverage or perceive
that they do.  If such a transaction goes forward, the dealmakers want to
know this, so as to be able to fairly judge the risk, and how to allocate it
in the deal.  thanks  mcs

Mike Dahlke@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
04/07/2000 06:55
To: Mark Schroeder@ECT
cc:

Subject: Korean Consents

Per our conversation last week, please see attached.


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 12/01/2000
12:46 PM ---------------------------

Phillip M Love
11/30/2000 01:54 PM
To: Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jimmy Simien/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Victor
Guggenheim/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: NEW elf bowling!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 11/30/2000
01:53 PM ---------------------------

Bruce Mills@ENRON
11/30/2000 11:24 AM
To: Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: NEW elf bowling!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

---------------------- Forwarded by Bruce Mills/Corp/Enron on 11/30/2000
11:22 AM ---------------------------

"Cantu, Veronica" <vcantu@bcm.tmc.edu> on 11/30/2000 11:05:54 AM
To: "'Adrian Cantu'" <acantu@hotmail.com>, "'Amy_Copes@Dell.com'"
<Amy_Copes@Dell.com>, "'Bruce.Mills@enron.com'" <Bruce.Mills@enron.com>,
"'elena morales'" <elena_morales@excite.com>, "'Francisco Sanchez'"
<hcdpsecretary@hotmail.com>, "'Gina.Kane@AACN.org'" <Gina.Kane@AACN.org>,
"'Kristine Best'" <kristinebest@hotmail.com>, "Liau, Katherine"
<Kliau@www.urol.bcm.tmc.edu>
cc:

Subject: FW: NEW elf bowling!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

-----Original Message-----
From: Jonietz, Laurie
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 10:38 AM
To: 'ludmilla'; 'andrea'; Coleman, Angela; Cantu, Veronica; Riezner, Melanie
Subject: NEW elf bowling!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

i'm too dumb to figure this version out.  maybe it would help if i read the
rules.....

 - elves2.exe


We are continuing work to ensure our new online trading system, UBSWenergy, is ready for launch on the week of Feb. 11, which is the week following the anticipated Enron/UBS Closing Date of Friday, Feb. 8.

To assist in this process, we are planning an online trading simulation for Thursday, February 7 from  0900 to 1100 (CST). It is planned to include all  traders, originators, mid/back-office staff and IT teams who would normally be involved with electronic trading.

Purpose of the simulation - The simulation will test our "live" trading environment (restricted to internal access only) and will:

Test the integrity and functionality of the system and related processes (including credit, risk, legal, operations, etc.)
Provide an opportunity for traders to verify their products and product setup
Demonstrate how the trading system and processes work to UBS staff visiting next week

Nature of the simulation - The simulation will include testing of all processes related to trading and mid/back-office functions:

Credit, Legal, Risk, Operations, and other groups:
Profile tests for "external" customers (role-played by Originators)
Profile tests for internal users (traders, back-office, etc.)
Data and Process checking as completed transactions flow through Mid/back-Office systems

Traders and Originators:
Traders will be managing their individual books and associated products. Although we may be restricted to certain financial products on launch day, both physical and financial will be available during the simulation. Each trader will be asked to manage their individual position and profitability goals for the simulation.
Originators and others will be asked to play the roles of counterparties. Credit limits, etc. will be tested during the simulation.

Information Technology:
Will assist in preparing data on the system for the simulation.
After the simulation is over, will work with the relevant groups to test the trade-data in various systems and risk books
Will ensure all simulation data is removed from the system after the simulation is complete.

Next steps

Traders and Originators will be contacted prior to simulation day to ensure they have appropriate access to the system.
Originators will be assigned specific roles. You should expect to receive an email and/or handout on or before Wednesday, Feb. 6.
UBSWenergy personnel will be meeting with back office personnel over the next several days to ensure everything is in place for the simulation.

Summary

This simulation is an important step towards re-launching our trading business. We appreciate the participation of everyone involved as we prepare for the public launch of UBS Warburg Energy and the UBSWenergy trading platform.

If you have any questions, comments, suggestions, or ideas regarding this simulation, please feel free to contact Bob Shults (30397) or myself (31861).

Regards,
Dave Forster
713.853.1861
E-Mail:	David.Forster@enron.com


FYI...

Clickpaper approvals for 3/14 and 3/15 have Counterparty name issues
currently being researched by Clickpaper Product Control and GCP.

GCP adjustments will be highlighted in red.

Rgds.

Samuel x3-9890
ENW_GCP

From: Aparna Rajaram/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/14/2001 01:00 PM
To: Kelly Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron, Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice
Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill D Hare/HOU/ECT@ect, Steve Venturatos/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Camille Gerard/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary G Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel
Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Tom
Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Ken Curry/ENRON@enronXgate, Nicole Hunter/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Click Paper Approvals, 03-14-01

Please see attached. The amendments are specified in purple.

Regards,

Aparna Rajaram
ext. 5-4563


Start Date: 4/28/01; HourAhead hour: 10;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042810.txt


here is what my parents are doing for new years.  SWCC is the country club.
Let me know if either of the 2 that I have sent you sound interesting.

L,
e
---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 12/27/2000 10:59 AM
---------------------------

"Larry W. Bass" <lwbthemarine@bigplanet.com> on 12/27/2000 10:47:07 AM
To: jason <jason.bass2@compaq.com>, eric preston bass <Eric.Bass@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Fw: new years eve

Read the e-mails below and let me know if you guys are interested in doing
something along those lines. Let me know ASAP.-Dad

----- Original Message -----
From: K. Bass
To: Larry W. Bass
Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2000 10:03 AM
Subject: Re: new years eve

Hi Dearest,

Yes, 2001 will be better.  I have an appt. for a complete physical on Jan.
3.  Why don't you call and get your lab work done that day and we'll go for
lunch?

Yes, New Year's Eve sounds good with the boys.  I sent you messages from
both the boys.  Isn't it nice that they, independent of each other, think of
spending New Year's Eve with us?  That makes me feel good.  I can't think of
anybody I'd rather spend the evening with than my wonderful men and the
boys' signficant others.

SWCC would be fine.  Also, Ruth Chris' but that would be pricey.  I had
originally thought that the little Mexican place on 90A could cater some
food.  They're good and I just thought of that place we just read about -
Cafe what's her name on 90A.  But, by far, the easiest and least expensive,
I think, would be SWCC.

Love you, Toot
  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Larry W. Bass
  To: KATHY BASS
  Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2000 9:32 AM
  Subject: new years eve

  Hi Toot. Hope you start to feel better, soon. You have certainly had more
than your share of pain this year. Next year will be better. Saw the e-mail
from Jason, asking about New Year's eve. Eric also wanted to know what we
were doing. I told him we might get together with the Heberts, but they were
in any event welcomed to join us. Why don't we put together something simple
with the boys and D and S? We still have that wonderful Champagne from last
year.Maybe we could go to dinner early @ SWCC, then back home for games and
Champagne. Let me know what you think. If that sounds good, I will call SWCC
and find out the details. I am assuming the boys are available. Love you-L


Please tell me again which one of these agreements you want to go out asap?

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


First of all, congrats on the big win this weekend.  They keep proving me
wrong.  Second, sorry this is late.  Friday was 1st day, our longest of the
month.

   DRAFT

This is a summary of where we stand from a Risk Management perspective on the
PGT/Socal permanent assignment to Calpine  Currently there are 5 deals in
Tagg and 1 in the transport  model.

 EC3952.O - Annuity where the West desk pays PGT (from $.08987 to $.17308) on
67,500/Day thru Oct-23
 This deal will be unwound and this income (approx $30M) will fall out in the
West desk

 EC3952.F - Buy from Canada of 30,000/Day thru Oct-08 at Malin for Index +
$.00
 EC3952.K - Sell to AEC of 30,000/Day thru Oct-08 at Malin for Index + $.00
 As of now, these deals will remain unchanged in the system because AEC will
not let us out of the firm contract

 EC2208.B - Buy from Canada of 22,500/Day thru Oct-08 at Malin for Index -
$.005
 EC3952.B - Buy from Canada of 15,000/Day thru Oct-01 at Malin for Index -
$.01
 These deals will be unwound, but discussions between Philip Allen and ???
will reveal details not known at this point in time   (Bid/Offer)

 Transport Model - Kingsgate to Malin capacity of 67,500/Day beginning Nov-08
thru Oct-23
 This deal will have to be unwound or killed - Currently the deal is valued
at approx $12M in the West Desk

After unwinding these deals, the West desk will be kept whole, the remainder
will be granted out in orig.

This is my first go at it.  Let me know of any revisions you want.

DG    3-9573


Steve:

You had asked us to check the following CERA numbers:

No new major power plants built in past 10 years
CA economy grew 29 % over past 5 years
Electricity consumption grew by 24 % in same period

Jennifer Thome looked into the numbers and has provided the following:

Most of the media and wire stories use the CERA numbers
According to Margaret Carson, there are two main problems with CERA's
numbers:  1) consumption includes the entire WSCC region; 2) economic growth
figures are in 1996 dollars
CEC and other CA state agency sites do not provide much updated information
and Margaret indicated that the state is reluctant to highlight its high
growth and consumption rates.
Margaret is finalizing a presentation for Rick that provides the following
figures for 1997, 1998, 1999 and 2000:
CA Economic Growth:  5.6%, 6%, 4.5%, and 8.7% respectively
CA Electricity Demand: 3%, 0%, 4% and 9% respectively


Wow!  All on the same day.  That's super.  Thank you so very much.  Vince
is coming up to Baylor on Monday of next week and we will hash out our
question list then.

Thanks

John

At 04:54 PM 11/6/00 -0600, you wrote:
>Good afternoon John,
>
>I just want to drop you a line to update you re: Andy Fastow.  I have
>confirmed a one hour interview slot with Mr. Fastow in Monday, December 4th
>from
>11:00 a.m. - noon.  This is in addition to your schedule interviews with
>Mr. Lay and Mr. Skilling - outline below.
>
>If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at
>713-853-5670.
>
>Regards,
>
>Cindy
>
>
>----- Forwarded by Cindy Derecskey/Corp/Enron on 11/06/2000 04:49 PM -----
>

>                    Cindy

>                    Derecskey            To:     "John Martin"
<J_Martin@baylor.edu>
>                                         cc:     Vince J
Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christie Patrick/HOU/ECT@ECT
>                    10/31/2000           Subject:     RE: Enron Case
Study(Document link: Cindy Derecskey)
>                    01:44 PM

>

>

>
>
>
>Good afternoon John,
>
>I hope things are well with you.  I am writing to update you on the status
>of your meetings with Andy Fastow, Ken Lay and Jeff Skilling.  I have
>arranged the following meeting dates and times with Ken Lay and Jeff
>Skilling, (I am still trying to work with Andy Fastow's schedule):
>
>Jeff Skilling
>December 4th
>2:00 - 3:00 p.m.
>
>Ken Lay
>December 4th
>3:30 - 4:30 p.m.
>
>Also, I will attempt to schedule the meeting with Andy Fastow for December
>4th for convenience - this will also allow us to possibly schedule
>additional meetings for the 5th (as needed).  I will let you know as soon
>as I'm successful.
>
>Regards,
>
>Cindy Derecskey
>University Affairs
>Enron Corp.
>
>
>
>
>
John D. Martin
Carr P. Collins Chair in Finance
Finance Department
Baylor University
PO Box 98004
Waco, TX 76798
254-710-4473 (Office)
254-710-1092 (Fax)
J_Martin@Baylor.edu
web:    http://hsb.baylor.edu/html/martinj/home.html


OR
Well, which one is it?  You want to share some information with the rest of
Enron, but you don't know whether it belongs in the ThinkBank or in eMeet.
Here is a handy quiz to help you make the decision.  Answers appear just
below the quiz.
What kind of information do you want to share?
A.  A well-developed idea or suggestion for something that will affect
Enron's bottom line, either through revenue or savings.
B.  A question or a statement that you want someone else at Enron to answer
or discuss.
C.  None of the above.
D.  Both A and B.
If you chose "A," deposit an idea in the ThinkBank's Idea Vault.  If you
chose "B," eMeet is the place for you.  If you chose "C" or "D," send an
e-mail to ethink@enron.com and let us know what you're trying to share.
We'll help you find the right place for it in eThink.

Wednesday, Mar. 29 at 10 a.m. Houston time, join Mark Koenig, executive vice
president of Enron Investor Relations.  Mark will answer questions about the
role of Investor Relations and also provide a stock update.  Remember, if you
can't make the live event, pre-submit your questions now on the eSpeak site.
Mark will be able to address them during his eSpeak, and you can see his
answers in the transcript after the event.

ethink.enron.com


fyi.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hernandez, Elizabeth L.
Sent:	Wednesday, October 10, 2001 7:51 AM
To:	Lamadrid, Victor; Garcia, Clarissa; Smith, George F.
Cc:	Goodell, Scott; Germany, Chris; Farmer, Daren J.; South, Steven P.; Tholt, Jane M.; Reitmeyer, Jay; Pereira, Susan W.; Ring, Andrea; Kelly, Katherine L.; Ferries, Nelson; Barbe, Robin; Gillespie, Steve; Baumbach, David
Subject:	Deal Validation

Effective immediately Sean Riordan @X5-4298 will be responsible for Deal Validation issues.  He is taking over all my current duties as I will be moving to a new group.  I will be helping Sean with Deal Validation issues until 10/19/2001.

Please let your group know that they should now be calling Sean for assistance.


---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT on 06/13/2000
10:08 AM ---------------------------

Shirley Elliott <shelliott@dttus.com> on 06/05/2000 07:55:26 AM
To: Chad.Landry@enron.com, jjohnson@daewoous.com, JohnWheeler@PZLQS.com,
Matt@TriangleTechnology.com, Terri@ediarchitecture.com,
Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Fw: Bad Girl Barbies....

> >Subject: Fwd: Bad Girl Barbies....
> >Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2000 09:55:40 PDT
> >
> >
> >
> >>When Ruth Handler decided in 1959 to make a durable, plastic fashion
doll
> >>for
> >>her daughter Barbara to play with, she probably had now idea that her
> >>
> >>creation would one day become a cultural icon.  Barbie is, without a
> >>doubt,
> >>the world's most famous doll, and over the last 40 years, there have
been
> >>literally hundreds of available versions of this blonde bombshell.  From
> >>Glitter Beach Barbiec and Shopping Spree Barbiec to Pilgrim Barbiec and
> >>Country Bride Blonde Barbiec, you probably thought you'd seen them all.
> >>Well,
> >>boy, were you wrong!  With the new millennium fast approaching, Barbie's
> >>here
> >>to prove yet again that she's very capable at keeping pace with these
> >>ever-changing times.  Below are ten brand new Barbie dolls that are
> >>currently
> >>under development.  Download the attached. JPEG file to sneak a peek at
> >>what
> >>the folks at Mattel Toys have in store for you (BADGIRLBARBIE.JPG).
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>BAYOU BONDAGE BARBIEc
> >>Barbie just loves the beach!  Unfortunately, Ken took a wrong turn off
> >>I-55
> >>near New Orleans, and our copulating couple got lost. Now, Barbie is in
a
> >>bit
> >>of a "bind." Will she free herself in time for Spring Break
Shenanigansc,
> >>or
> >>will she join Ken in an alligator's large intestine? Only you can
decide!
> >>Inbred Raging' Cajunc not included.)
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>SORORITY SLUT BARBIEc
> >>Barbie loves keg parties. And she inherently trusts her boyfriend of 4
> >>months, Kappa Kappa Kenc. Those two facts spell certain social disaster
> >>for
> >>Sorority Slut Barbiec. She even comes with her very own funnel!  Kappa
> >>Kappa
> >>Voyeur Video Recording Roomc play set sold separately.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>GOTH BARBIEc
> >>She's all the "rave!"  Goth Barbie likes lurking around in urban
dungeons,
> >>inhaling whip-its, and asking complete strangers to pierce her genitalia
> >>(although she's not particularly crazy about sunlight or personal
> >>hygiene).
> >>Glitter Great Sarcophagusc sold separately.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>EXOTIC DANCE BARBIEc
> >>Some girls will do anything for a buck. But not Exotic Dancer Barbie!
Her
> >>two-minute lap dances cost 20 smackers, and that's without any touching
> >>whatsoever!  How many dollars will it cost Middle Management Kenc to
> >>figure
> >>that out? You decide!  (Greased Polec included, if you know what I
mean.)
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>TRANSGENDER BARBIEc
> >>Fortunately, today's Barbie isn't confined by silly and archaic notions
> >>such
> >>as "gender identity."  Introducing Kendrac, the only Barbie able to
> >>clearly
> >>see beyond stereotypical gender lines. Whether you're in the mood for
> >>club-hopping or feel-copping, count Kendrac out (of the closet, that
is)!
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>GANGSTA BITCH BARBIEc
> >>Gangsta Bitch Barbie doesn't mind if you manufacture crank in her
house --
> >>but don't talk to Compton Kenc, or she just might plug a cap in your
ass!
> >>Extra rounds not included. Drive-by Death Dodgec sold separately.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>PARANOID BARBIEc
> >>Authentic alien abductee, or just another raving lunatic wrapped in
> >>aluminum
> >>foil? Only you can decide whether Paranoid Barbie is down-to-Earth or
> >>out-to-lunch. (Rectal probec included upon request.)
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>BABY GOT BACK BARBIEc
> >>Barbie knows that the bigger the cushion, the sweeter the pushin, and
with
> >>Ken ever eager to bring up the proverbial rear, this Barbie's caboose is
> >>certainly loose (not to mention gigantic!). Move over ladies, if you
can!
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>FEMI-NAZI BARBIEc
> >>Sometimes Barbie just gets sick and tired of Ken's shit. Backed with a
> >>little
> >>bit of bitterness, a bunch of overweight short-haired friends, and a
whole
> >>lot of Ken-Kickin' Groin Buster Actionc, Femi-Nazi Barbie is marching
> >>toward
> >>some gender justice. Watch out, Ken -- it's that time of the month!
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>LACTATING BARBIEc
> >>What could be more natural than a mother and her newborn baby? We
honestly
> >>haven't given it much thought. But we do know that if word of this
Barbie
> >>leaks out, little squirts will be trickling into stores everywhere!
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
 - BADGIRLB.TIF
 - RFC-822.TXT
---------------------------------- Forwarded
----------------------------------
From: scody@acplasticsinc.com at Internet-USA
Date: 6/2/00 3:21PM -0500
To: Shirley Elliott at DTT.US.HOUSTON
*To: TRACITX@AOL.COM at Internet-USA
*To: shanda@acplasticsinc.com at Internet-USA
*To: sshaver@musserbunch.com at Internet-USA
*To: sbaldwin@lcc.net at Internet-USA
*To: Michael_Ecklund@hines.com at Internet-USA
*To: mmcmilli@law.harvard.edu at Internet-USA
*To: mjmyers@wt.net at Internet-USA
*To: matt_devine@standardandpoors.com at Internet-USA
*To: mbowles@acosta.com at Internet-USA
*To: SABLICA@COMPUSERVE.COM at Internet-USA
*To: andersonkr@afsimage.com at Internet-USA
*To: GATMAN@acplasticsinc.com at Internet-USA
*To: Katie@acplasticsinc.com at Internet-USA
*To: ashcrof@hs.utc.com at Internet-USA
*To: johnstarr@acplasticsinc.com at Internet-USA
*To: Jim Crable at DTT.US.HOUSTON
*To: coleman@wt.net at Internet-USA
*To: gglas1@AOL.COM at Internet-USA
*To: WALDRON50@YAHOO.COM at Internet-USA
*To: deven.l.williams@us.arthurandersen.com at Internet-USA
*To: sab6211@labs.tamu.edu at Internet-USA
*To: brian@acplasticsinc.com at Internet-USA
*To: bhughes@entergy.com at Internet-USA
*To: bigal@acplasticsinc.com at Internet-USA
*To: AJOHNSON@acplasticsinc.com at Internet-USA
Subject: Fw: Bad Girl Barbies....
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-


I need to reprice Stagecoach's gas swap.  The location is TGP Zone 5.  I 've
also attached the monthly MMBtus for one year.

Please let me know if you need me to provide additional information for
repricing gas for this deal.  Thanks again.

Maria


I only have 3 - Am still trying to get a 4th.

Darron Giron
Jeff Sorenson
Trey Logan


<http://rs6.net/on.jsp?t=1010947444322.1010945480759&o=http://ccprod.roving.com/roving/images/p1x1.gif>
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Merchant Power Monthly	 ........................

	.....
  <http://ccprod.roving.com/roving/images/letters/spacer.gif>
  <http://ccprod.roving.com/roving/images/letters/spacer.gif>
In just this month's issue, we have almost 7,000 MW of new plants documented!

- - Plus, the records on who owns each plant, their corporate structure, ownership changes and even foreign plants. Gleaned from FERC filings, we also provide you the docket number for each plant, so you can follow up and pull full documentation on any which are of interest-- free! We also provide you with feature stories on plants in progress from around the nation.

SPECIAL OFFER: Order Merchant Power Monthly for only $196/year ($295/year if you require hardcopy) and receive FREE all of the back-issues of this millenium (in pdf format

Every Exempt Wholesale Generator, Qualifying Facility, Power Marketer Filing, since January 2000, and start your subscription in February 2002, for only $196!

Save even more with a corporate pdf site license. Only $1,000 for distribution to your entire company! Keep it on your server for access as required, rebroadcast it yourself, or give us the list of recipients and let us take care of delivery for you-- your choice!

FOR THIS SPECIAL OFFER, YOU MUST ORDER BEFORE February 15

For a sample issue, download: htt p://www.pmaconference.com/0201MPM.pdf  <http://www.pmaconference.com/0201MPM.pdf>

email: info@pmaconference.com <mailto:info@pmaconference.com>
voice: (703) 641-0613

  <http://ccprod.roving.com/roving/images/letters/spacer.gif>
This email was sent to scorman@enron.com, at your request, by PowerMarketers.com <http://rs6.net/tn.jsp?t=ctttsqn6.xbwxqqn6.9arrsqn6&p=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.PowerMarketers.com>.
Visit our Subscription Center to edit <http://ccprod.roving.com/roving/d.jsp?p=oo&m=1000838503237&ea=scorman@enron.com> your interests or unsubscribe <http://ccprod.roving.com/roving/d.jsp?p=oo&m=1000838503237&ea=scorman@enron.com>.
View our privacy policy <http://ccprod.roving.com/roving/CCPrivacyPolicy.jsp>.

Powered by
Constant Contact <http://www.constantcontact.com/index.jsp?cc=tsapr>


FYI: One of our legal consultants has mentioned that another of his clients
is setting up an internet derivatives trading system.  They are using an
outfit called Intuitive Products International based in New York and London
to assist with system design.  Tana Jones (x33399) will be setting up a demo
by these folks with our legal department needs in mind - if you'd like to
attend, we'd be happy to have you and ask them to expand their presentation
to include internet trading.


Kathy,

Please use the book id FT-CAND-PWR-PRC  and name the file
CanadaPower_08022000.

These are the only changes I am having to make each night.

Thanks for your help.

Robin


Dear Mr. Lay:

I'm writing this note to you as a show of support to you during your dire
times.  The reason that I share this with you is my respect for you as a
CEO, a business leader and a person.  My wife is one of your employees who
routinely shares stories about you that are nothing less than inspiring.  I
know that during difficult times, sometimes words emerge that can help
people through difficult times.  I believe that you are sincere man and
know that you must be broken hearted, but I hope that this article can help
you lead a dispirted workforce to see things more clearly.  My wife, Shelly
Pierce, has worked for Enron for the past two years and like many of your
employees, has lost a great deal of her life savings.  Of course, I accept
most of the blame for this for reasons related to this article.  I lost my
investment discipline and held out the false hope that Enron could not
falter.  After reading the article to her while I was out of town, I
believe that her spirit was a bit rejuvenated and she was ready to face the
challenges that lay before you.

Mr. Lay, I appreciate the opportunity that you have given my wife and our
family and hope that this story inspires you to regain your successes.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From the USA Today, Tuesday, November 27, 2001, page 15A.

"In recession, face brutal facts, thrive"
By Jim Collins

    A man in his early 20s recently asked me, "So what's a recession like?"
Its an entirely alien concept to him; he'd grown up during the greatest
economic boom in modern memory.  His question drove home the fact that we
haven't faced a severe, protracted economic setback for nearly 2 decades,
leaving us terribly unpracticed at dealing with tough times.
    With this recession - long in coming, perhaps long to stay - now
officially upon us, it is imperative that corporate leaders relearn a key
lesson about how great companies (and great people) deal with difficult
times differently from how they deal with merely good ones.  That lesson is
the "Stockdale Paradox," a peculiar psychology shown by those who emerge
from tough times not just intact, but stronger.
    Adm. Jim Stockdale was the highest-ranking U.S. military officer in the
Hanoi prison camp during the Vietnam War.  Tortured many times during his
8-year imprisonment, Stockdale lived without any prisoner's rights, no set
release date and no certainty as to whether he would ever again see his
family.
    He shouldered the burden of command while fighting an internal war
against his captors and their attempts to use the prisoners for propaganda.
At one point, he beat himself with a stool and cut himself with a razor,
deliberately disfiguring himself so that he could not be put on video as an
example of a "well-treated prisoner."  He exchanged secret intelligence
information with his wife through their letters knowing that discovery
would mean more torture and perhaps death.  After his release, Stockdale
became the first three-star officer in the history of the Navy to wear both
aviator wings and the Congressional Medal of Honor.
    You can understand, then, my anticipation at the prospect of spending
part of an afternoon with Stockdale, who happened to be at the Hoover
Institute across the street from my office when I taught at Stanford.  In
preparation, I read In Love and War, the book he and his wife wrote to
chronicle their experiences those 8 years.
    As I read the book, I found myself getting depressed.  It just seemed
so bleak - the uncertainty of his fate, the brutality of his captors.  And
then it dawned on me:  Here I am sitting in my warm comfortable office,
looking out over the Stanford campus on a beautiful Saturday afternoon.
I'm getting depressed reading this, and I know that he gets out, reunites
with his family and becomes a national hero.  If it feels depressing for
me, how on earth did he deal with it when he was actually there and did not
know the end of the story?
    "I never lost faith in the end of the story," Stockdale said when I
asked him.  "I never doubted not only that I would get out, but also that I
would prevail in the end and turn the experience into the defining event of
my life that, in retrospect, I would not trade."
    I didn't say anything for many minutes, and we continued the slow walk
toward the faculty club, Stockdale limping and arc-swinging his leg, still
stiff from repeated torture.  Finally, I asked, "Who didn't make it out?"
    "Oh, that's easy," he said.  "The optimists."
    "The optimists?  I don't understand," I said, completely confused.
    "The optimists.  Oh, they were the ones who said, 'We're going to be
out by Christmas.'  And Christmas would come, and Christmas would go.  Then
they'd say, 'We're going to be out by Easter.'  And Easter would come, and
Easter would go.  And then Thanksgiving, and then it would be Christmas
again.  And they died of a broken heart."
    After another long pause, he turned to me and said, "This is a very
important lesson.  You must never confuse faith that you will prevail in
the end - which you can never afford to lose - with the need for discipline
to confront the most brutal facts of your current reality, whatever they
might be."
    My conversation with Stockdale had a profound influence on me, but I
never really considered it a business lesson until my research team began
to wrestle with the question of why some companies rise from difficulty to
become great while others emerge from those exact same difficulties
weakened and dispirited.  We found that companies that became great
embraced a corporate version of the Stockdale Paradox.
    Fannie Mae, for example found itself in the 1982 recession losing $1M
every business day, with $56B in loans under water.  Many analysts thought
Fannie Mae, which was getting 9% on its mortgage portfolio but paying 15%
on the debt it issued, was doomed.
   But CEO David Maxwell and his team never wavered in their aim to not
merely survive, but also to prevail as a great company.  Yes, they
confronted the brutal fact that the interest-rate problem was not going to
magically disappear (certainly not by Christmas).  But they used this grim
fact as a catalyst for creating an entirely new business model based on
asking three central questions of greatness:
        What can we potentially do better than any other company in the
        world?
        What can best drive our economic engine?
        What best ignites the passions of our people?
    Instead of reacting to the recession with mindless restructuring,
Fannie Mae rebuilt itself based on its answers to these questions.
Eventually, it generated investor returns nearly eight times those of the
general stock market.
    When asked how he dealt with the nay Sayers and the analysts who wrote
Fannie Mae off, Maxwell said that it was never an issue inside the company.
"Of course, we had to stop doing a lot of stupid things, but we never
entertained the possibility that we would fail.   We were going to use the
calamity as an opportunity to remake Fannie Maw into a great company."
    The sad truth is that most executive teams won't respond that way to
these dark days of uncertainty.  Instead of using this recession as an
opportunity to fundamentally rethink their business and rebuild a culture
of discipline, the will simply restructure, lay off a bunch of people and
liquidate their cultural equity.  Mediocre leaders will hold out false
hopes for a quick fix, only to watch those hopes be swept away by events.
Their companies will begin to die of a broken heart.
    It need not be this way.  Those who lead with the Stockdale Paradox -
those who retain the unwavering faith that they will find a way to prevail
in the end, but who also retain the discipline to confront the most brutal
facts of reality - will find this an ideal time to rebuild and reinforce
greatness.

    Used correctly, this recession can be a defining time in your firm's
history that , in retrospect, you would not trade.  Used wrongly, this
recession will weaken your foundations and make it that much harder to
become great.  The choice is yours.

    Jim Collins, the author of Good to Great, operates a
management-research laboratory in Boulder, Colo.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Regards,

Steve

Steve Alexander
Vice President, North American Artemis Consulting
Artemis International Solutions Corporation
Office:  +1 281.338.9616
Mobile:  +1 281.830.7430
www.artemisintl.com


WHat?

-----Original Message-----
From: Fenner, Chet [mailto:Chet_Fenner@bmc.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 7:39 AM
To: Parks, Joe
Subject: It's Happening!

Here we go!


Start Date: 4/22/01; HourAhead hour: 9;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042209.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 9 / Preferred:  12.00 / Final:  11.98)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/22/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_ERNIE
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 9 / Preferred:  62.44 / Final:  62.41)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE3
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/22/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


Alert Posted: 11:05 AM December 1, 2000: CGC Interruptible notice for Sun.,
12/03/00 at 10 AM.
ATTENTION CGC INTERRUPTIBLE CUSTOMERS AND THEIR SHIPPERS:
Effective at 10 AM, Sunday, December 3, 2000 and until further notice,
Chattanooga Gas Company (CGC)  is issuing a curtailment order for all
interruptible customers.  The interruptible customers are limited to their
scheduled gas from the interstate pipelines plus any firm contract amounts
with CGC.   No other CGC gas is available for interruptible sales at this
time (sometimes these interruptible sales have been refered to as incremental
or emergency gas).


For your reading pleasure.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/30/2001 06:19
PM ---------------------------

Kay Mann
03/30/2001 06:14 PM
To: rvincens@deltapower.com, gregorylang@paulhastings.com,
ccampbell@kslaw.com, jkeffer@kslaw.com
cc: Stephen Thome/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jake Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Turbine contract

I have taken what I believe this is the most recent form of the GE turbine
contract, changed to reflect the difference in purchaser, and filled in some
of the blanks.  I have compared it against the Delta redline that Rick sent
me this afternoon, after having accepted Delta's proposed changes for the
purpose of running the comparison.   The notes included are placeholders
since I wasn't clear if these items will change with the equipment swap.

GE is also reviewing Salmon Energy Agreeement version 2.

redline

Thanks,

Kay


Hi Carolyn,

Could you resend the docs?  Our computer system deleted everything more than 30 days old.

Thanks,

Kay

-----Original Message-----
From: Campbell, Carolyn [mailto:CCampbell@KSLAW.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2001 12:03 PM
To: Mann, Kay
Cc: Keffer, John
Subject: Exercise of Put Right on CA Energy Development

Kay:

I just wanted to check in regarding the status on exercise of the put right
for CA Energy Development I and II LLC. Let me know if you have any comments
on the documents or if we can further assist you.  Thanks.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King & Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete all copies of the message.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Schmidt, Ann M.
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 2:09 PM
Subject:	Enron Mentions

Fitch Places Marlin Water Trust II & Osprey Trust I on Rtg Watch
Bloomberg, 10/26/012001-10-26 15:00 (New York)

Enron's Debt Falls As Company Draws Down On Bank Loans
Capital Markets Report, 10/26/01
Enron Sues Microsoft Over Failed Broadband Services Deal
Dow Jones Energy Service, 10/26/01
ENRON UNIT TAKES HEAT POWER GROUP SAYS ENERGY FIRM FAILED BOND REQUIREMENTS
The Boston Globe, 10/26/01
FRONT PAGE - COMPANIES & MARKETS: Enron's explanations fail to quell critics' concerns
Financial Times; Oct 26, 2001

Enron Bonds Fall as Company Taps $3 Bln Credit Line (Update3)
Bloomberg, 10/26/01

Weiss & Yourman Law Office Announces Class Action Lawsuit Against Enron Corp.
Business Wire, 10/26/01

Fitch Places Marlin Water Trust II & Osprey Trust I on Rtg Watch
2001-10-26 15:00 (New York)

Fitch Places Marlin Water Trust II & Osprey Trust I on Rtg Watch Neg

Fitch-NY-October 26, 2001: Fitch has placed the ratings of
Marlin Water Trust II's (Marlin II's) approximately $915 million
senior secured notes due 2003, and Osprey Trust's (Osprey's)
approximately $2.4 billion senior secured notes due 2003 on
Rating Watch Negative. The Marlin II notes and the Osprey notes
are currently rated `BBB'. This rating action follows the
placing of Enron Corp.'s ratings on Rating Watch Negative by
Fitch.

The rating of the Marlin II notes is supported by an overfund
account (pre-funded interest) and equity commitment from Enron
in the form of mandatorily convertible preferred stock. The
overfund account is invested in Enron debt securities (rated
'BBB+', Rating Watch Negative), with payments used to service
interest to noteholders. Payment of principal ultimately relies
on Enron's obligation to remarket mandatorily convertible
preferred securities. Fitch currently rates Enron's preferred
securities 'BBB-', Rating Watch Negative. In addition, the
transaction also benefits from rights under a $125 million loan
to Azurix Europe Limited, rated `BBB+' by Fitch.

Similarly, the rating of the Osprey I notes is based on the
support from the assets in the share trust used to support
interest payments and an equity commitment from Enron to
remarket mandatorily convertible preferred stock to fund
principal payments. The mandatorily convertible preferred stock
has been issued and is being held in the share trust. The assets
in the share trust supporting interest payments include Enron
unsecured obligations (the overfund account) as well as
quarterly dividend payments on the mandatorily convertible
preferred stock.

While various sources of repayment exist, such as sale or
liquidation of the underlying assets or an equity offering, in
each case primary credit support is derived from the Enron
obligation to remarket mandatorily convertible preferred stock
if an amount sufficient to repay the notes has not been
deposited with the trustee the 120-day prior to the maturity
date, which is one of the Note Trigger Events. In the event that
the issuance of the preferred stock yields less than the amount
required to redeem the senior notes, Enron is required to
deliver additional shares. If Enron cannot or does not deliver
on this obligation, subject to certain standstill periods, then
the amount of the deficiency becomes a payment obligation of
Enron, representing a general unsecured claim. Additional Note
Trigger Events include a downgrade of Enron's senior unsecured
debt below investment grade by any of the major rating agencies
in conjunction with specified declines in Enron's closing stock
price over three consecutive trading days, as well as customary
events of default under the notes. It is important to note that
Enron has not verified that the underlying assets have adequate
market value to fully pay down the associated debt.

Fitch will continue to monitor these transactions in conjunction
with the ratings of Enron, Corp. and will update investors as
appropriate.

Enron's Debt Falls As Company Draws Down On Bank Loans

10/26/2001
Capital Markets Report
(Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)

NEW YORK -(Dow Jones)- Enron Corp.'s (ENE) bond and bank debt was quoted lower early Friday following the Houston energy giant's decision Thursday to draw down about $3 billion on its bank loan facilities.
Late Thursday, Enron said it had taken action to dispel uncertainty in the financial community. Specifically, the company said it drew on its committed lines of credit to provide cash liquidity in excess of $1 billion.
Enron's 6.4% bonds which come due in July 2006 were hovering just below 80 cents on the dollar, down from around 82 cents on Thursday.
Trading activity in investment-grade bank debt like that of Enron's isn't as active as the market for leveraged loans made to companies with less than investment-grade ratings. But fixed-income sources noted some offers Friday for Enron's bank debt at around 94 cents on the dollar, still well-above distressed levels. They add that banks may want to try to sell Enron's bank debt, which is now funded following the drawdown, but at a coupon that was negotiated several months ago.
That was well before Enron ran into its current market turmoil. Last week, the company reported a $618 million third quarter loss and $1.2 billion reduction in shareholder equity. The company has said that the Securities and Exchange Commission is conducting an inquiry into transactions it did with Andrew S. Fastow, its former chief financial officer who was replaced on Wednesday.
Moody's Investors Service rates Enron's senior unsecured debt at Baa1, though it's on review for a possible downgrade. Fitch Inc. and Standard & Poor's both rate the debt triple-B-plus. Fitch also has Enron's debt on review for a possible downgrade, while S&P changed Enron's credit outlook to negative from stable.
Enron's stock was trading at around $15.87, down 48 cents at around 12.20 p.m. EDT.
Among the Enron bank debt that comes due in May 2002 is a $1.75 billion 364-day commercial paper backstop facility. The company also has a $1.25 billion revolving facility that's due in April 2005, according to Loan Pricing Corp. in New York.
One distressed debt investor said some of the bank debt comes with a low coupon of around 55 basis points over the London Interbank Offered Rate.
Banks, the investor said, "are funding it and not getting paid for the risk at Libor plus 55, even though it comes due in May '02," the investor said.
Another fixed-income official said that trading desks may start to kick the tires on Enron's bank debt, given the run of fallen angels, or investment-grade companies that have been downgraded to below investment-grade status, within the last year. Among such companies are Lucent Technologies Inc. (LU) and Xerox Corp. (XRX)
"As soon as banks have a piece of paper they never expected to be funded, it really changes their perception and some just want to get this stuff off their books," this person said.
Some banks, though, may not be active seller of Enron's debt given that banks' business with big investment-grade companies is relationship-driven.
"Banks are not very quick to pull out of a relationship like that," the fixed income official said.

-By Joe Niedzielski, Dow Jones Newswires, 201-938-2039; joe.niedzielski@dowjones.com

Copyright ? 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Enron Sues Microsoft Over Failed Broadband Services Deal
By Michael Rieke
Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES

10/26/2001
Dow Jones Energy Service
(Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)

HOUSTON -(Dow Jones)- In a July conference call with analysts when Jeff Skilling was still chief executive of Enron Corp. (ENE), he threw out a ray of hope for his company's foundering broadband business.
Enron Broadband Services had just signed a long-term deal to provide bandwidth for MSN, Microsoft Corp.'s (MSFT) online Internet service, Skilling said. Enron would give more details on the deal later.
After three months without farther word on the deal, Enron has broken its silence by suing Microsoft.
In a suit filed Thursday in the district court of Harris County, Texas, Enron claimed Microsoft has failed to live up to terms of the deal.
The agreement, signed June 25, called for Enron Broadband to develop and provide network capacity and other services to support Microsoft's offering of high-speed Internet service, according to the lawsuit.
Microsoft was required to develop an electronic ordering and billing system for use with all regional Bell telephone companies during an initial phase of the deal, according to the lawsuit.
Microsoft has failed to provide that system and other items required in the deal, so Enron isn't required to deliver operational broadband services for the deal, the lawsuit said.

Microsoft sent Enron a letter dated Oct. 23 saying that if Enron didn't provide an operational broadband system by Oct. 25, Enron would have breached the contract, the lawsuit said. Microsoft then would be entitled to recover damages.
The suit also said Microsoft failed to provide monthly subscriber growth forecast required by the deal.
In a third breach of the contract, the suit claimed, Microsoft made public announcements about the subject of the agreement without getting Enron's prior approval.
An Enron official told Dow Jones Newswires that Microsoft had issued a press release Oct. 15 about the service but that Enron wasn't mentioned in the release.
A Microsoft news release dated Oct. 15 announced what the company calls MSN 7, a new version of the MSN network which includes high-speed, or broadband, access to the Web. The service was to be available on Oct. 25.
The Microsoft release said MSN 7 would deliver "state-of-the-art" video and audio through "dramatically improved" broadband technology. The new service would extend MSN broadband service "to more than 29 million households in 45 markets."
By the end of the first quarter of 2002, the Microsoft release said, the MSN broadband service would be available to more than 90% of U.S. households capable of using high-speed digital subscriber line access.
The Enron lawsuit asked that Microsoft be declared in breach of contract. It also asked that Enron be allowed to recover unspecified damages as well as costs stemming from the lawsuit.
Neither Enron nor Microsoft have responded to requests for comment on the lawsuit.
The Microsoft deal is the second failed broadband agreement. In July 2000, Enron and Blockbuster Video, a unit of Viacom Inc. (VIA), announced a deal to deliver movies over the Internet.
That deal fell apart in March of this year when Blockbuster said Enron's fiber-optic network couldn't deliver the service on a dependable basis. Enron countered that Blockbuster couldn't deliver the quality and quantity of movies needed for a successful video-on-demand service.
-By Michael Rieke, Dow Jones Newswires; 713-547-9207; michael.rieke@dowjones.com

Copyright ? 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Business
ENRON UNIT TAKES HEAT POWER GROUP SAYS ENERGY FIRM FAILED BOND REQUIREMENTS
Jeffrey Krasner, Globe Staff

10/26/2001
The Boston Globe
THIRD
C.1
(Copyright 2001)

The retail sales subsidiary of Houston energy giant Enron Corp. faced expulsion last week from the New England group representing power generators, marketers and distributors. The sales unit had failed to meet bonding requirements intended to protect market participants and the group itself from unpaid bills.
ISO New England, which operates the power grid throughout the six New England states, urged Nepool, the power industry group, to "initiate termination proceedings" for Enron Energy Services Inc., according to a letter obtained by the Globe.
An Enron spokeswoman yesterday said the company had satisfied Nepool's requirements, and blamed the threatening letter on a series of administrative oversights, including the failure of ISO New England to warn Enron of previous instances when the bond fell below required levels.
"It was an administrative snafu," said Peggy Mahoney, a spokeswoman for Enron. "It's fixed. It's no big deal. We didn't get the paperwork in [on time] because it got sent to the wrong desk. It was taken care of on Friday."
According to the letter, a Nepool participant faces termination if it has failed to meet its bonding requirements three times over the previous 12 months. "Having three defaults to trigger that letter does not happen frequently," said Ellen Foley, an ISO New England spokeswoman. In the letter, ISO's chief financial officer, Edward McKenna, said his organization "has been in contact with Enron Energy Services through multiple telephone communications, and to date the financial assurance has not been cured."
But Mahoney said Enron never received written notification of its previous "financial assurance" defaults, which were corrected almost immediately. Therefore, she said, the company was unaware that the current default was the third, which begins the expulsion proceeding. In addition, she said, the current default notice was sent to the wrong person, creating the delay that resulted in the letter. "We're working with ISO New England to figure that out," she said.
The recommended termination is an embarrassment to Enron because the firm's director of state government affairs, Daniel W. Allegretti, is the chairman of Nepool's Participant Committee, which organizes and oversees the major membership meetings in the organization.
"This is not that unusual within the pool," said Allegretti. "I frequently receive notices of technical defaults." As far as posting the new bond to correct the situation, he said, "We were two and a half days late in submitting paperwork."
The incident also comes at a particularly sensitive time for Enron. The parent in Houston has been the subject of a financial scandal in which the firm's chief financial officer, Andrew S. Fastow, is accused of profiting from partnerships he oversaw that engaged in billions of dollars of transactions with Enron. The Securities and Exchange Commission is probing those transactions, the company said Monday. Enron placed Fastow on leave Tuesday and installed a new CFO.
Enron's stock has plunged amid ongoing revelations about the partnerships and their impact on the company's financial strength. The company reduced shareholder equity by $1.2 billion after terminating transactions by one of the partnerships that had been headed by Fastow, according to The Wall Street Journal. Enron lost $618 million in the third quarter.
Yesterday, Enron's shares closed at $16.35, down 6 cents, on volume of 39.1 million shares.
Jeffrey Krasner can be reached by e-mail at krasner@globe.com.

Copyright ? 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

FRONT PAGE - COMPANIES & MARKETS: Enron's explanations fail to quell critics' concerns
Financial Times; Oct 26, 2001
By JULIE EARLE and SHEILA MCNULTY

Enron has put up a page on its website of "frequently asked questions" in response to a barrage of analysts' enquiries following last week's controversial results announcement.
Unfortunately, the US energy group's critics have not been satisfied with the answers. Nor has Wednesday's decision to replace Andrew Fastow, its chief financial officer, quelled all investors' concerns about its highly complex financial affairs.
However, analysts are pleased that Kenneth Lay, chief executive officer, is distancing the group from Mr Fastow and his ties to controversial financing vehicle "partnerships". "It is a step in the right direction and we are happy to see them move," says Ronald Barone of UBS Warburg. "It's not the end of it."
The shares, which have tumbled since last week's results, ended a shade lower yesterday, off 0.37 per cent at Dollars 16.35. But analysts warn that the shares will continue to languish well below the 52-week high of Dollars 84.87 until the group improves its transparency.
One of the frequently asked questions following Enron's results announcement on October 16 concerned "a Dollars 1.2bn (Pounds 840m) reduction in shareholders' equity". The Dollars 1.2bn was not explained in the news release on the results, but mentioned in passing by Mr Lay in a follow-up conference call. Many analysts confused it with a Dollars 1.01bn charge in the earnings report.
It has since been called a "loss" and a "write-off" and Enron's staff have struggled to explain it in plain language.
Enron's official position now is that the reduction in shareholders' equity related to a structured finance vehicle in which LJM, a private equity fund formed by Mr Fastow, was an investor. When the decision was made to terminate these vehicles, Enron "recorded a Dollars 1.2bn reduction in shareholders' equity and a corresponding reduction in receivables. These adjustments were the result of Enron's termination of obligations to deliver Enron shares in future periods".
The confusion over the Dollars 1.2bn has further undermined the credibility of Enron, which is now the subject of an unofficial inquiry by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Analysts were upset they did not know the adjustment was in the offing and note that it could be seen as increasing the group's debt ratio, which might hurt its debt rating.
Mr Lay held an analysts' meeting to counter charges that Enron was not transparent. But this ended with demands for daily calls with outside auditors to explain its accounts. "I find the disclosure is not complete enough for me to understand and explain all the intricacies of these transactions," said Goldman Sachs' David Fleischer.
Other analysts are also concerned about potential further write-offs. Salomon Smith Barney's Raymond Niles points to Enron's investments in its Dabhol Indian power plant, its South American investments, and its remaining telecoms assets. Most importantly, he says, they may include several of Enron's other off-balance-sheet vehicles.
"Frankly, we have not been able to get enough information on them to evaluate whether there is a problem with them," Mr Niles says. Other US energy traders have been distancing themselves from their rival. El Paso said it was facing "a lot of questions on its accounting practices".
Additional reporting by Julie Earle Enron in turmoil: www.ft.com/enron
Copyright: The Financial Times Limited

Enron Bonds Fall as Company Taps $3 Bln Credit Line (Update3)
2001-10-26 14:26 (New York)

Enron Bonds Fall as Company Taps $3 Bln Credit Line (Update3)

     (Adds Egan-Jones lowering credit rating in 12th paragraph.)

     Houston, Oct. 26 (Bloomberg) -- Enron Corp. bonds and shares
fell after the company failed to reassure investors its bond
rating wouldn't be lowered and tapped a $3 billion credit line
because it can no longer borrow in the commercial paper markets.

     Enron's stock has fallen 52 percent in the past 10 days after
investors questioned the company's transactions with affiliated
companies run by its former chief financial officer. The stock
fell 45 cents to $15.90 in early afternoon trading today.

     ``People are questioning the credibility of management,''
said John Cassady, who helps manage $3 billion of fixed income
assets at Fifth Third Bancorp. ``It looks like the guy who was
supposed to do everything for the benefit of shareholders was
running partnerships for the benefit of himself.''

     Enron is shut out of commercial paper markets, where short-
term loans carry lower rates than banks offer. The company will
use its credit line to pay off $2.2 billion in commercial paper it
has outstanding, Enron spokesman Mark Palmer said.

      The company's 6 3/4 percent bonds which mature in 2009
declined 1 1/2 points to a bid of 84 cents on the dollar and an
offer of 86 cents. At that price, the bonds, which carry a rating
of ``BBB+,'' yield 9.53 percent.

     Enron's shares have dropped as investors grew concerned that
the company's credit rating will be cut after $1.01 billion in
third-quarter losses from failed investments. Enron needs good
credit to raise cash daily to keep trading partners from demanding
collateral and to settle transactions.

                         Dilution Concerns

     Though Enron's bonds have investment-grade ratings, their
yield at current prices is higher than those of industrial bonds
that carry junk ratings. According to Bloomberg data, companies
with ``BB'' ratings pay on average 9.16 percent to borrow for
seven years.

     A lower credit rating may also force Enron to buy back
holdings in other partnerships with its stock, diluting the value
of Enron investors' stock.

     Partnerships called Whitewing, Marlin and Yosemite own Enron
assets they bought with borrowed money. Enron sold the assets to
the partnerships to keep debt related to them off its books. The
partnerships plan to repay the borrowed money by selling the
assets.

     If Enron loses investment-grade rating, the borrowed money
comes due earlier, leaving less time for the partnerships to find
the best price for the power plants and other assets. Enron would
have to make up any shortfall between what the assets would sell
for and the amount of the debt.

     One way would be issuing common shares in exchange for Enron
preferred convertible shares held by the partnerships. That would
thin out the holding of every other investor.

     Of the two main bond rating companies, Moody's Investors
Service has the company on watch for possible downgrade, and
Standard & Poor's lowered Enron's long-term credit outlook to
negative. Egan-Jones Rating Co. today lowered its rating on
Enron's debt to BB+, one notch below investment grade, from BBB-.

                         Other Liabilities

     Enron's liabilities associated with the partnerships amounts
to at least $3.3 billion, the company has said.

     Enron ousted Chief Financial Officer Andrew Fastow on
Wednesday amid a Securities and Exchange Commission inquiry into a
partnership he ran that cost the company $35 million in direct
losses. Enron also bought back 62 million shares from the
partnership, reducing shareholder equity by $1.2 billion.

     Jeff McMahon, head of Enron's industrial markets group, was
named CFO in a bid to restore investor confidence, Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer Kenneth Lay said in a statement.

--Mark Johnson in the Princeton newsroom (609) 750-4662, or at
50-4662, or at

Weiss & Yourman Law Office Announces Class Action Lawsuit Against Enron Corp.

10/26/2001
Business Wire
(Copyright (c) 2001, Business Wire)

NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Oct. 26, 2001--A class action lawsuit against Enron Corp. ("Enron" or the "Company")(NYSE:ENE) and certain of its officers and directors was commenced in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division, on behalf of purchasers of Enron securities. If you purchased Enron securities between January 18, 2000 and October 17, 2001, please read this notice.
The complaint charges the defendants with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The complaint alleges that defendants failed to disclose material adverse information and misrepresented the truth about the Company and caused plaintiff and other members of the Class to purchase Enron common stock at artificially inflated prices.
This action seeks to recover damages on behalf of defrauded investors who purchased Enron securities. Plaintiff is represented by Weiss & Yourman, a law firm possessing significant experience and expertise in prosecuting class actions on behalf of defrauded shareholders in federal and state courts throughout the United States. Weiss & Yourman has been appointed by numerous courts to serve as lead counsel in class action lawsuits and in that capacity has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars on behalf of investors.
If you purchased Enron securities between January 18, 2000 and October 17, 2001, you may move the Court no later than December 21, 2001, to serve as a lead plaintiff of the class. In order to serve as a lead plaintiff, you must meet certain legal requirements. A lead plaintiff is a representative party that acts on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. In order to be appointed lead plaintiff, the Court must determine that the class member's claim is typical of the claims of other class members, and that the class member will adequately represent the class. Under certain circumstances, one or more class members may together serve as "lead plaintiff." Your ability to share in any recovery is not, however, affected by the decision whether or not to serve as a lead plaintiff. You may retain Weiss & Yourman or other counsel of your choice to serve as your counsel in this action.
If you wish to receive an investor package or if you wish to discuss this action, have any questions concerning this notice or your rights or interests with respect to this matter, or if you have any information you wish to provide to us, pleas

contact:
Mark D. Smilow, David C. Katz, and/or James E. Tullman, (888) 593-4771 or (212) 682-3025, via Internet electronic mail at info@wynyc.com or by writing Weiss & Yourman, The French Building, 551 Fifth Avenue, Suite 1600, New York, New York 10176.
CONTACT: Weiss & Yourman Mark D. Smilow, David C. Katz, and/or James E. Tullman, 888/593-4771 or 212/682-3025 info@wynyc.com
13:06 EDT OCTOBER 26, 2001
Copyright ? 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.


---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 09/13/99 03:09
PM ---------------------------

"LOPEZ AUFRANC, Patricia" <PLA@marval.com.ar> on 09/10/99 01:07:00 PM
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RV: memo on derivatives

>   See attached.
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Este mensaje es confidencial. Puede contener informacion amparada
por el secreto profesional. Si usted ha recibido este e-mail por error,
por favor comuniquenoslo inmediatamente via e-mail y tenga la
amabilidad de eliminarlo de su sistema; no debera copiar el mensaje
ni divulgar su contenido a ninguna persona. Muchas gracias.

This message is confidential. It may also contain information that is
privileged or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure. If you have
received it by mistake please let us know by e-mail immediately and
delete it from your system; should also not copy the message nor
disclose its contents to anyone. Many thanks.
 ---------------------------------------------------------------------

 - att1.unk


Attached please find the final version of the above-referenced document.
You will note that Exhibit H-2 is not included in the electronic copy.
It is included, however, in the execution copy being sent to you via
Federal Express.

Should you have any questions or comments, please don't hesitate to
contact me.

Peter Thompson

<<ESA Break-out Agreement  Execution Copy.DOC>>
 - ESA Break-out Agreement  Execution Copy.DOC


I believe I approved this yesterday.  If further action is required, please
let me know.

	Information Risk Management
	07/25/2000 05:46 PM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: For Mark Taylor's approval

Below you will find a copy of a request that is awaiting your approval.
Please advise us as to your approval or rejection of this request by way of
email.

I thank you in advance for your cooperation in this matter.

Leola Barnett
IRM
X37965
---------------------- Forwarded by Information Risk Management/HOU/ECT on
07/25/2000 05:45 PM ---------------------------

	 Security Resource Request System				Pending Manager Approval
 Resource Request					How to find the status of this request...
	General Information		Initials:

Requestor:	Jenny Helton/HOU/ECT	Phone:	713-853-9218
Requested For:		Stephanie Panus
Request Type:	New Hire-Employee
RC #:	105657	WO #:
Company #:	0413	Priority:	High
Manager:	Mark Taylor
Location:			Houston
					In the Request Processing section, see the status column for each requested
resource.
					Look at the overall status of the request in the title bar above. The status
will display Closed when your request is complete.
					Click the "Status" button below.
Comments:
					Request #: JHEN-4MKT5C
					Submitted: 07/25/2000 04:40:07 PM

	Name	Cost	Status	Implementation Comments
	Application/Database
	CompareRite....
Default Applications....
DJI (Dow Jones Interactive)....
ECT Legal Foreign & Domestic....
Internet Mail Access (NEW ACC....
Jurisdictional Document Libra....
Lexis Nexis Research - Legal....
Lotus Notes - New ID Access O....
No....
Terminal Server 4.0....
Unlisted Lotus Notes Applicti....
Westlaw....
Yes....

please enter social security number, if known room number and phone number
please enter social security number, if known room number and phone number

	Not Started
Not Started
Not Started
Not Started
Not Started
Not Started
Not Started
Not Started
Not Started
Not Started
Not Started
Not Started
Not Started
	Directory/Resource/Other
	O:\Legal ... Directory		Not Started

	Request Processing Path
Processed By	Status	When	Comments

	Manager

	Security

	Implementation

		Editing History (Only the last five (5) are shown)

Edit #	Past Authors	Edit Dates
1
2
3	Jenny Helton
Jenny Helton
Jenny Helton 	07/25/2000 04:39:42 PM
07/25/2000 04:40:05 PM
07/25/2000 04:40:07 PM


Hey Jeff: Here are the photos of the James Mont settees and the Gio Ponti
enamel you requested at the Modernism show.

The zigzag lamp is being packed and will be on its way via UPS by Thursday,
and your receipt is in the mail.

Pair James Mont settees:
Dimensions: 54" w x 32" deep x 26.5" high
Price: $17,000.00

Gio Ponti for Del Campo enamel:
Dimensions: 12.5" long x 5" deep x .75" high
Price: $850.00

Please let us know if you have any questions. Hope we see you again soon in
New York!

Becca

--
Greg Wooten
Patrick Parrish
Mondo Cane
143 West 22nd Street
New York, New York 10011
1.646.486.7616
1.646.486.7615 Fax

 - Mont settees 3.JPG copy


Please call him and set this up
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 01/18/2000
07:59 AM ---------------------------

nmanne@susmangodfrey.com on 01/17/2000 05:15:13 PM
To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: lunch

Let me know if any of the following work
for you for lunch:

1/26, 1/31, 1/4