[IMAGE]
 Anna Kournikova Exclusive Fantasy Offer!  Save 10% on Anna's 2002 Calendar! Yes 12 months of Anna!  Simply enter the coupon code FNTSYCAL in step 5 of the checkout process to receive your discount.  Offer expires 11/30/01.  http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/1/135/sffer1120tr.cgi   Attention Fantasy Fans!  Subscribe to The Sporting News  now and get 4 FREE issues! Hurry!   Brought to you by   Sponsorship Bar You are receiving these e-reports because you have signed up for CBS SportsLine.com Fantasy Football.  To customize, reschedule, or turn off these reports please  click here    NFL Reports, Player Updates  [IMAGE]Latest NFL Player News  Rod Smith , WR DEN - G money Updated 11/21/01 Smith's sprained ankle was not healed enough for him to practice on Tuesday, and there is a real chance he might miss Thursday's game against Dallas. He suffered the injury Nov. 11, and aggravated it during Sunday's game. You should probably play it safe and keep Smith on your bench for this week. Temper your expectations for the entire Broncos' offense as well - the Cowboys' D isn't the pushover many believed it would be prior to the season.  Shaun Alexander , RB SEA - God Upda! te! d 11/20/01 With Ricky Watters expected to miss another two to three weeks, Alexander will remain the focal point of many contending Fantasy teams during their charge to the playoffs. He should roll up some fine numbers against the Chiefs this week.  Tom Brady , QB NE - God Updated 11/20/01 The Patriots will stick with Brady for now, and Drew Bledsoe will remain the team's No. 2 QB. "I don't see any changes this week," coach Bill Belichick said. Brady is a solid Fantasy starter right now, but add Bledsoe to your roster as an insurance policy if you can.  Jo! na! than Quinn  , QB JAC - Free Agent Updated 11/20/01 Quinn may have to start in place of Mark Brunell (quadriceps) again this week. Brunell's status is still unclear for Sunday's game.  Ricky Watters , RB SEA - God Updated 11/20/01 Watters' shoulder has not sufficiently healed enough for him to practice, says the Seattle Times. He is not expected to return for another two to three weeks, meaning Shaun Alexander will continue to be a key performer for many Fantasy teams as the postseason comes into view.  Doug Flutie , QB SD - Starboy ! Updated 11/20/01 Mike Riley told the San Diego Union-Tribune there is no QB controversy involving Flutie and rookie Drew Brees. "Doug is going to be our quarterback," he said. "You can talk about controversy all you want, but there is none within this building. He is our quarterback. He will start. He will get us the next win the next week." Still, Flutie is not playing well enought to satisfy most Fantasy owners.  Mark Bruener , TE PIT - Free Agent Updated 11/20/01 Bruener will miss the rest of the season after undergoing shoulder injury. His loss may adversely affect Jerome Bettis' statistics, because Bruener is widely regarded as the best run-blocking tight end in football.  Tyrone Wheatley , RB OAK - El-Gato Updated 11/20/01 Wheatley told the Contra-Costa Times he is no longer being bothered by a knee injury. He expects to play on Sunday.  Erron Kinney , TE TEN - G money Updated 11/20/01 Kinney (calf) may play this week after missing three games. He was expected to return to practice early this week.  Frank Wycheck , TE TEN - El-Gato Updated 11/20/01 Wycheck (calf) will be limited in practice this week. He may be a risky start in Week 11.  Steve McNair , QB TEN - Beegs Boys Updated 11/20/01 The Tennessean says McNair's hand was sore when he arrived at the team's practice facility on Monday. Jeff Fisher now says he doesn't expect him to miss any practice time this week.   Derrick Alexander , WR KC - G money Updated 11/20/01 Alexander (ribs) has returned to practice. He is expected to start against Seattle.  Marvin Minnis , WR KC - R-Diddy Updated 11/20/01 Minnis (ankle) is listed as doubtful for Sunday's game. Larry Parker may have to start in his place,  Reggie Wayne , WR IND - Free Agent Updated 11/20/01 Wayne has a sprained knee ligament, and is doubtful for Sunday's game against New Orleans. Terrence Wilkins may have to start in his place.  Jerome Pathon , WR IND - Free Agent Updated 11/! 20! /01 Pathon (foot) is done for the season. He will be put on injured reserve. Reggie Wayne (knee) is also hurting, meaning Terrence Wilkins might have to be moved back into the starting lineup.   Jay Fiedler , QB MIA - Kar Bombs Updated 11/20/01 Dave Wannstedt told the Miami Herald there is no QB controversy surrounding Fielder and backup Ray right now. ``That's kind of hypothetical,'' he said. ``Jay is the starter, and my only comment is we're going to get it squared away and play turnover-free football.''  Rod Smith , WR DEN - G money  Updated 11/20/01 Mike Shanahan said he does not know if Smith (ankle) will be sufficiently healed to play in Thursday's game against the Cowboys. "We'll get a chance to evaluate that during the week and see," Shanahan told the Denver Post. "If he can help our football team, he'll play. If he's in a situation where he can't perform at the level that we think can help our team, then we'll keep him out and put somebody else in."   Benjamin Gay , RB CLE - Free Agent Updated 11/20/01 The Cleveland Plain-Dealer says Butch Davis won't indicate how much Gay will play in the near future. "We'll try to get him involved in some of the games," Davis said. "We'll see."   Kevin Lockett , WR WAS - Free Agent Updated 11/20/01 Lockett, who suffered a rib injury last weekend against Denver, expects to play on Sunday against Philadelphia. However, the wide receiver has no real value as a Fantasy player at this point.   Tony Banks , QB WAS - Free Agent Updated 11/20/01 Barring any setbacks, Banks will start Sunday's game against Philadelphia. Banks, who suffered a concussion last weekend vs. Denver, hasn't been feeling any after effects of the injury and should be under center for the 'Skins.   Jacquez Green , WR TB - Beegs Boys Updated 11/20/01 Green (abdomen) is expected to return to practice on Wednesday at full strength. He's been inconsistent this season, and is best used when the matchup is favorable.   Terrell Owens , WR SF - God Updated 11/20/01 Owens suffered a sprained left knee and ankle during the overtime session of last weekend's game against Carolina. The injuries aren't considered serious, however, and Owens is expected to be in the starting lineup on Sunday Indianapolis.   Cecil Martin , RB PHI - Free Agent Updated 11/20/01 Martin suffered a hamstring injury during Sunday's game against Dallas. He'll miss a few days of practice, but is expected to play in this weekend's game against Washington. Martin has no real value as a Fantasy player, but he is a key blocker for Duce Staley.    Giants , DT NYG - Starboy Updated 11/20/01 According to the New York Post , cornerback Jason Sehorn's surgically-repaired right knee began giving him problems again this past weekend. In fact, the team was unsure that he'd be able to cover either Randy Moss or Cris Carter on Monday night, but he played anyway. If he continues to play on a bad wheel, you should consider starting any receivers opposing Sehorn the rest of the season.   Elvis Grbac , QB BAL - Beegs Boys Updated 11/20/01 The Baltimore Sun says there is no indication that Grbac will be replaced as the team's starting QB. Still, he is not performing well enough to start for most Fantasy teams.  Donald Driver,! WR GB - Free Agent Updated 11/20/01Driver is still dealing with a thigh injury, and is expected to miss Thursday's game against Detroit. The reserve wideout has no real value as a Fantasy player at this point.   Ravens , DT BAL - BCWD's Updated 11/20/01 Defensive end Michael McCrary will miss the rest of the season after undergoing knee surgery. His loss will certainly lower the sack output of the Baltimore defense and may mean the team will allow more passing yardage than usual.    Cowboys , DT DAL - Beegs Boys Updated 11/20/01 Linebacker Dexter Coakley, who was expected to miss two weeks due to a sprained knee, will likely get the start on Thursday after being out for just one game. He'll help keep Denver's running game in check, but don't expect his presence to give Dallas' defense added Fantasy value as a whole.   Emmitt Smith , RB DAL - Hurricanes Updated 11/20/01 Smith (knee) will start on Thursday's game against Denver. "I'm not 100 percent, but I'm healthy enough to do my job," Smith told the Dallas Morning Star. He'll struggle to post solid Fantasy numbers due to Dallas' horrid passing game, so bench him this week if at all possible.     Donald Hayes , WR CAR - Free Agent Updated 11/20/01 Hayes suffered bruised ribs during Sunday's game against San Francisco. He may miss some practice time this week, but he's expected to play this weekend against Atlanta. The Falcons secondary is one of the worst in the league, so Hayes could turn into a good sleeper pick in Week 11.   More Updates  Teams, Rosters  [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] God Joe Stepenovitch    Player TM Pos Status Next Bye Garcia, Jeff  SF QB Active @IND Week 6 Alexander, Shaun  SEA RB Active @KC Week 6 Smith, Lamar  MIA RB Active @BUF Week 6 Owens, Terrell  SF WR Active @IND Week 6 Ismail, Qadry  BAL WR Active @JAC Week 13 Walls, Wesley  CAR TE Active ATL Week 14 Carney, John  NO K Active @NE Week 2 Buccaneers  TB DT Active @STL Week 2 Brady, Tom  NE QB Reserve NO Week 16 Jackson, James  CLE RB Reserve CIN Week 7 Mack, Stacey  JAC RB Reserve BAL Week 5 Brown, Troy  NE WR Reserve NO Week 16 Hakim, Az-Zahir  STL WR Reserve TB Week 8 Dilger, Ken  IND TE Reserve SF Week 4 Vanderjagt, Mike  IND K Reserve SF Week 4 Browns  CLE DT Reserve CIN Week 7 Watters, Ricky  SEA RB Injured @KC Week 6  Total Active Players: 8 Total Injured Players: 1 Total Reserve Players: 8  NFL Injuries for God Updated Player Team Pos Injury E! xpected Return 11/19/01 Hakim, Az-Zahir  STL WR Ankle Day to day 11/18/01 Jackson, James  CLE RB Ankle Missed Sunday's game at Bal. 11/20/01 Owens, Terrell  SF WR Knee/Ankle Probable for Sunday's game at Ind. 11/20/01 Watters, Ricky  SEA RB Shoulder Expected to miss another two to three weeks  Transactions, View  [IMAGE]Transactions Date Time Player Team Transaction Effective Cost!  11/21/01 9:43 AM Price, Peerless Kar Bombs Signed Week 11   11/21/01 9:43 AM Pinkston, Todd Kar Bombs Released Week 11   11/21/01 9:43 AM Bradford, Corey Kar Bombs Signed Week 11   11/21/01 9:43 AM Pathon, Jerome Kar Bombs Released Week 11   11/21/01 9:43 AM Browns God Signed Week 11   11/21/01 9:43 AM Bills God Released Week 11   [IMAGE]  Copyright 2001 Commissioner.COM Inc and SportsLine.com Inc. Your site can be reached from http://fantasy.sportsline.com   FB10SP


Ken:

Enron Transportation Services Company (ETS) and El Paso Gas Pipeline Company
(El Paso) have entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to jointly
analyze and develop an Alaskan Natural Gas Pipeline Project (tentatively
named North Star Pipeline).  Both parties did not want to press release the
MOU.

The MOU only commits us to jointly study, evaluate and fund a project
proposal.  It can be canceled at any time, for any reason, and is not an
exclusive.

The "Alaskan Producers" are telling us they want to team-up with someone who
can help them get the gas to the markets.  Four (4) Bcf of incremental
supplies just cannot be directed to a market hub...i.e., Chicago, for
instance.

Our goal with El Paso is to develop a joint market assessment of where the
demand for incremental supplies is needed and then develop a total project
that would get the gas to the various markets.

Our ownership of NNG, TW and NBPL and El Paso's ownership of ANR, El Paso and
Tennessee will cover a lot of impacted pipelines.

I believe our best bet as of now is not to commit to a specific route or
project (i.e., Hoglund's), but work with the producers on a total delivery
system...wellhead to city gate/burner tip.

Your thoughts would be appreciated before we move too far in this direction.

Stan

P.S.  My guess is we would look at a 10% to 15% interest in a project
financed (75%) pipeline.


here is the order responding on DASR cutoffs.


"NAI at a Glance" reports on recent and future NAI events. In an effort to strengthen and broaden NAI's network, "NAI at a Glance" also disseminates timely and important articles by leading members and friends of the network.  For further information on the New Atlantic Initiative, please see our web page at www.aei.org/nai/nai.htm.

Jeffrey Gedmin
Resident Scholar, American Enterprise Institute
Executive Director, New Atlantic Initiative

______________________
RECENT NAI EVENTS

ROUNDTABLE WITH HENRY KISSINGER, PARIS, MAY 28, 2001. At a roundtable meeting hosted by NAI, HENRY KISSINGER discussed the future of ballistic missile defense, the ABM Treaty, and NATO enlargement. He encouraged a transatlantic approach toward Russia. Other meeting participants included MARC PERRIN DE BRICHAMBAUT of the French Ministry of Defense; ROBERT COOPER of the UK's Cabinet office; AEI's RICHARD PERLE; and MICHEL FOUCHER of the French Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

LUNCH DISCUSSION WITH EMYR JONES PARRY, AEI, MAY 17, 2001. According to Parry, the political director of the UK's Foreign and Commonwealth Office, Britain wants to see Europe succeed in a way that doesn't diminish Europe's transatlantic link.  Contrary to press reports, he explained that not even the French advocate something separate from NATO.  Thus, talk of a slow cooling in the Atlantic alliance may be greatly exaggerated, according to Parry, who also fielded questions about North Korea, saying that U.S. and E.U. positions are really "not so different."

LUNCH WITH RUSSIAN BUSINESS LEADERS, AEI, MAY 2, 2001. RICHARD PERLE hosted Club 2015, a group of Russian business leaders and politicians, who together discussed the danger of a Russian military that is holding onto the past, the problems of widespread corruption, the consequences for internal policy formation, and the direction of U.S.-Russia relations.  Agreement centered around the fact that there are few immediate threats to Russia that necessitate a military response.  The Russians see difficulty in coming to agreement on issues of NATO expansion and missile defense and insist on a less unilateral, more dialogue-oriented U.S. approach.  What the Russians need to do in relations with the U.S., Perle suggested, is drop their old agenda.

_________________________
UPCOMING NAI EVENTS*

SECURITY AND COOPERATION IN EUROPE IN THE 21st CENTURY, ISTANBUL, JUNE 28-29. NAI will sponsor a delegation to participate in the ARI Movement's conference in Istanbul. THIS EVENT IS BY INVITATION ONLY.

NATO ENLARGEMENT AND SECURITY IN NORTHERN EUROPE, COPENHAGEN, SUMMER 2001 (DATE TBD). A group of NAI invitees will discuss strategies for the next round of NATO enlargement.  THIS EVENT IS BY INVITATION ONLY.

NAI CONGRESS OF BUDAPEST, SEPTEMBER 28-29. The New Atlantic Initiative will convene a congress hosted by Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orb?n in Budapest. Sessions will deal with ballistic missile defense, NATO enlargement, Southeastern European security, Russia, and US-EU relations. THIS EVENT IS BY INVITATION ONLY.

ASIA DELEGATION VISIT, FALL 2001 (DATE TBD). Trade and missile defense will be two of the issues an NAI-led delegation will discuss in meetings in Taiwan, Japan, and China.  THIS EVENT IS BY INVITATION ONLY.

*The information presented here is subject to change without notice.

__________________________
RECOMMENDED READING
Please click here to view these articles online: http://www.aei.org/nai/recread.htm

BLAIR SHOULD KEEP A CLOSER EYE ON AMERICA by Irwin Stelzer, The Sunday Times, May 6, 2001.  Stelzer argues that "Events have soured the Anglo-American relationship to the point where it is on the verge of losing its 'special' character."  After Blair's expected victory this month, it will inevitably be time for him make firm policy decisions that will undoubtedly impact the UK's relationship with the US.  Between cuts in EU defense spending, plans for the ERRF, and U.S. missile defense talks, the special relationship faces many challenges.

OUT TO TORPEDO MISSILE DEFENSE by Robert Kagan, Washington Post, May 9, 2001.  Kagan points out the bitter partisanship of the Democrats' flip-flop on missile defense.  Last year, Democrats were lining up to support Clinton's efforts to deploy NMD; this year, they make every effort to oppose Bush in his talks on the issue, culminating in former U.N. ambassador Richard Holbrooke's call for Europe to be more vocal in opposing the President's plans.

US TO UK: DON'T LET BRUSSELS RUIN IT by Toby Harnden, The Spectator, May 12, 2001.  Reporting on NAI's recent panel discussion on European defense, Harnden discusses the transatlantic controversy surrounding ESDP.  The NAI discussion proved that while many Europeans are convinced of ESDP's necessity, American officials remain extremely skeptical of their intentions.  Participating on the panel were CHARLES GRANT of the Centre for European Reform (London), CHRISTOPH BERTRAM of the Institut fuer Wissenschaft und Politik (Berlin), GILLES ANDREANI of the French Foreign Ministry, AEI's RICHARD PERLE, and former CIA director R. JAMES WOOLSEY.  UPI's MARTIN WALKER served as the panel chairman.

EUROPE, MEET MR. RUMSFELD by Jeffrey Gedmin, Wall Street Journal Europe, May 23, 2001.  The Bush administration has been off to a rocky start with its European allies. Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld "appears to hold special honors," writes Gedmin, "when it comes to fueling European anxieties." Gedmin reviews U.S.-European disagreements on missile defense and ESDP, arguing that Rumsfeld, rather than being an ideologue as detractors contend, is taking a strictly pragmatic view of most transatlantic issues.

WASHINGTON FINDS A SOFT SPOT FOR ITS OLD ENEMY by Gerard Baker, Financial Times, May 31, 2001.  Baker argues that the US and Russia can redefine their relationship in terms of two democracies cooperating toward common goals without the use of the ABM treaty.  According to Baker, perhaps "the refusal of some Europeans to consider the possibility of a fundamentally changed relationship with Russia*owes more to an enduring eagerness to frustrate US ambitions than to work for lasting transatlantic cooperation."

DRIVING A TRANS-ATLANTIC WEDGE by Jeffrey Gedmin, Wall Street Journal Europe, June 5, 2001.  As U.S. President George Bush prepares to embark on his first trip to Europe, Gedmin reviews the apparent obsession of some EU elites with the issue of the death penalty in the United States. Gedmin argues that opinion about capital punishment is more complex on both sides of the Atlantic than some would like to admit. According to Gedmin, some in Europe are using the death penalty to express Euronationalist, anti-American sentiment.

__________________________________
TO UNSUBSCRIBE to NAI at a GLANCE and NAI invitations
If you would prefer to not receive this update or invitations to public NAI events, please send a reply to this message and type "NO EMAIL" in the subject line.

TO UNSUBSCRIBE to NAI Invitations
If you do not wish to receive notices of public NAI events, please respond to this e-mail and type "NO EVENTS" in the subject line.
If you wish to receive notices of public events in Europe only, please respond and type "EUROPE ONLY" in the subject line.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------
W E E K E N D   S Y S T E M S   A V A I L A B I L I T Y

F O R

November 3, 2000 5:00pm through November 6, 2000 12:00am
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------

SCHEDULED SYSTEM OUTAGES:

ARDMORE DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

AZURIX: No Scheduled Outages.

EB34 DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

EDI SERVER: No Scheduled Outages.

ENRON NORTH AMERICAN LANS:  No Scheduled Outages.

FIELD SERVICES:  No Scheduled Outages.

INTERNET: SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

LOTUS NOTES: No Scheduled Outages.

MARKET DATA: No Scheduled Outages.

NT: No Scheduled Outages.

OS/2:  No Scheduled Outages.

OTHER SYSTEMS:  SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

OTHER SYSTEMS:
Impact:  CORP
Time:  Sat 11/4/2000 at  11:00:00 PM CT thru Sat 11/4/2000 at  11:45:00 PM CT
 Sat 11/4/2000 at    9:00:00 PM PT  thru Sat 11/4/2000 at   9:45:00 PM PT
 Sun 11/5/2000 at   5:00:00 AM London thru Sun 11/5/2000 at  5:45:00 AM London
Outage:  ERMT Database
Environments Impacted:  ENA
Purpose: To Increase Number of Processes, sessions, and transactions in the
init.ora file
Backout: Restore the original init.ora file and restart database
Contact(s):  Alex Hsieh  713-853-6561  713-288-1779

OTHER SYSTEMS: Batch Scheduling
Impact:  CORP
Time:  Fri 11/3/2000 at  8:00:00 PM CT thru Fri 11/3/2000 at  9:00:00 PM CT
 Fri 11/3/2000 at  6:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 11/3/2000 at  7:00:00 PM PT
 Sat 11/4/2000 at  2:00:00 AM London  thru Sat 11/4/2000 at  3:00:00 AM London
Outage:  Batch Scheduling Server maintenance
Environments Impacted:  Corp
Purpose: This maintenance is to upgrade some of our older servers (
ECTHOU-BPMS1 and ECTHOU-BPS1)and replace them with newer ones, as well as
back up our current data.
Backout: Re initialize old servers and bring them on-line.
Contact(s):  Larry Robinson  713-853-5956  713-284-3554
  Rusty Cheves  713-345-3798  713-415-4707

SITARA:  No Scheduled Outages.

SUN/OSS SYSTEM: No Scheduled Outages.

TELEPHONY: No Scheduled Outages

TERMINAL SERVER:  No Scheduled Outages.

UNIFY:  No Scheduled Outages.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------
FOR ASSISTANCE

(713) 853-1411   Enron Resolution Center
(713) 853-5536   Information Risk Management

Specific Applications Help:
Unify On-Call      (713) 284-3757  [Pager]
Sitara On-Call     (713) 288-0101  [Pager]
RUS/GOPS/GeoTools/APRS   (713) 639-9726  [Pager]
OSS/UA4/TARP    (713) 285-3165  [Pager]
CPR      (713) 284-4175  [Pager]
EDI Support      (713) 327-3893  [Pager]
All Other Systems    (713) 563-5797  [Pager]
      or (713) 563-5987  [Pager]


disregard the flow data,,,,still a work in progress.  just thought you might like to know where the points are. and just select end when the macro errors out.


-----Original Message-----
From: Proctor, Shemin V. [mailto:sproctor@akllp.com]
Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 10:47 AM
To: Parks, Joe
Subject: Centana Contract

Hi Joe,
It's on its way to the new fax no.
Shemin

Shemin V. Proctor
Andrews & Kurth LLP
1701 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W., Suite 300
Washington, D.C. 20006
(202) 662-3052
(202) 662-2739 (fax)
sproctor@akllp.com
 <<Proctor, Shemin V..vcf>>


---------------------- Forwarded by Stephanie Harris/Corp/Enron on 03/29/2000
08:48 AM ---------------------------

Kristina Mordaunt@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
03/28/2000 07:57 PM
To: Stephanie Harris/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: San Antonio Meeting

Jim-  I was out last week and am just now making it through e-mails and
responses.  Hope this is timely for you to craft the agenda for Tues/Wed next
week.  The following is a list of potential topics to discuss with the group,
should you decide that is appropriate.

1.  Brobeck's and V&E's increase in associate salaries and our response ,if
any , to it; and

2.  Revisit/ discuss policies re: waiver of jury trial, arbitration and
indemnities.

Kristina

	Stephanie Harris@ENRON
	03/23/00 04:31 PM

		 To: Kristina Mordaunt/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc:
		 Subject: San Antonio Meeting

---------------------- Forwarded by Stephanie Harris/Corp/Enron on 03/23/2000
04:30 PM ---------------------------

Stephanie Harris

03/21/2000 02:53 PM
To: John Ale/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Diana Jebousek/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Al
Alexanderson@ENRON, Karen Lewis@ENRON, Michael R Brown/LON/ECT@ECT, Fiona
Lavelle/LON/ECT@ECT, Charles Cheek/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Michelle
Lawless/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steve Duffy/Houston/Eott@Eott, MaryEllen
Hall/Houston/Eott@Eott, Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janette
Elbertson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth Labanowski/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Betsy
Raybon/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bruce Lundstrom/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Liz N Martinez/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Michael
Moran/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Emily Sellers/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kristina
Mordaunt/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Robin Jordan/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Janet Place/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Connie
Alvis/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Daniel R Rogers/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Connie Castillo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rex
Rogers/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sharon Morgan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Frank
Sayre/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Karen
Hedley/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John
Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Scott Sefton/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Joyce Dorsey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Leasa Lopez/HOU/EES@EES,
Adam Umanoff/EWC/Enron@Enron, Melanie Curran/EWC/Enron@Enron, Stephen
Wallace/Corp/Enron@Enron, Lisa M Kumbalek/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rob
Walls/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Debra
Hicks/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Randy
Young/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, MaryHelen
Martinez/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rebecca
Carter/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kelly Johnson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: San Antonio Meeting

 We will meet at the La Cantera facility in San Antonio, Texas from 5:30 p.m.
to 8:30 p.m. on Tuesday, April 4 and from 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. on
Wednesday, April 5.  Dinner will be served in our conference room Wednesday
night, and we will take an hour's break on Thursday for lunch.  Elizabeth
Labanowski has reserved a room for each of you at La Cantera.

 By Tuesday, March 28 please forward to me by e-mail a list of the topics you
propose be discussed at our meeting. Thank you.

 Jim


As required by the Houston Fire Department, a fire drill has been scheduled for the Enron Center Campus.

	Enron Center North, 1400 Smith St., approximately  3:15 PM on Thursday, December 20th, 2001

	Enron Center South, 1500 Louisiana St., approximately 3:45 PM on Thursday, December 20th, 2001

Please advise all clients, contractors, and visitors that this will be a fire drill only. The fire alarm will sound at 3:15 PM in Enron Center North and 3:45 PM in Enron Center South. You will be asked to go to the stairwell and standby.  Do not go into the stairwell.  Further instructions will be given over the public address system.  If you experience any difficulties in hearing either the fire alarm or any announcements over the public address system, please notify the Facilities Help Desk by e-mail at facilitieshelpdesk1@enron.com.

Anyone that is mobility impaired or medically disabled may be excused from participating in this drill by sending an e-mail to Harry Grubbs.

If you have any questions or need any additional information, please contact Harry Grubbs at 713-853-5417.


Vintage should be 93730.

Julie Meyers
12/20/99 02:27 PM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Evergreen deals

Look at comments below.

Julie

Daren J Farmer
12/20/99 01:43 PM
To: Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Evergreen deals

Julie,

I need to know if the following deals have evergreen provisions to roll into
Jan 2000.

Cokinos / 9676  95912 - No this is a GTC Firm contract, deal expires with
contract
Cokinos / 6373  128952 - This is a GTC Spot
Coral / 4120  93883 - This is on a Single Transaction contract, we would need
to check with the trader
Encina / 6392  93487 - Yes, this is a committed reserve.  I marked the
evergreen flag.
Midcoast / 5097  92956 - No, GTC 1st Purchaser, deal expires with contract.
United O&M / 5053 93728 - No, this deal was moved to the Wellhead portfolio
for January, but the deal was terminated per legal.
Vintage / 2540  93750 - Not the right deal number.

Thanks.

D


thanks Jim

regards
Dave


Scott Govenar, our outside lobbyist,  (916.448.8240) and Mike Day, our
outside counsel, might also be useful resources for you, John.

Best,
Jeff

	John Neslage@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	02/16/2001 03:44 PM

		 To: Leslie Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: California Legislation Info

Hey Leslie:

Sandi McCubbin told me that I should consult with you.  I am compiling
information on legislation being considered in California as a result of the
electrcity crisis for two main  purposes.  First, I need it for Steve Kean's
briefing book as he is scheduled to meet with a federal legislative panel in
California (Tauzin and Barton, +6 other Congressmen) on Wednesday, and
second, I am going  to compile info on emergency legislation and CPUC
proceedings in a central place for  knowledge management purposes.

Can you email me whatever information you may have on California
legislation?  I would greatly appreciate it.  I will also give you a call to
follow up.   Steve's leaving on Tuesday at Noon, so I need to get info
together well before then.

Thanks

John


======================== THE MOTLEY FOOL ========================
                    B R E A K F A S T   N E W S
                    Tuesday, September 25, 2001
benjamin.rogers@enron.com
=================================================================

IN THIS ISSUE
---------------------
- TOP STORY: Lost in America Online
  http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=502951

- NEWS TO GO: Steiner Leasure, Coke, and Herman Miller
  http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=502952

- POST OF THE DAY: The Weekend
  http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=502953

=================================================================

SPONSORED BY: ShareBuilder
Buy stocks for just $3!
Make dollar-based investments in the stocks and index
shares you choose for just $3 per transaction.
Or, pay $8 per month for unlimited stock buys.
http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=502954

"Being rich ain't what it's cracked up to be. It's just worry
and worry, and sweat and sweat, and a-wishing you was dead all
the time." -- Mark Twain, from The Adventures of Tom Sawyer

-----------------------------------------------------------------
TOP STORY
-----------------------------------------------------------------

LOST IN AMERICA ONLINE
All year long, leading media giant AOL Time Warner (NYSE: AOL)
had clung to its beefy annual projections that called for $40
billion in revenue and EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes,
depreciation, and amortization) of $11 billion. While its old
media peers buckled under a soft ad market and some of its new
media peers bowed out completely, AOL Time Warner stood firm.

>>FULL STORY:
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=502955

-----------------------------------------------------------------
NEWS TO GO
-----------------------------------------------------------------

While we can all use a good massage about now, here's the rub:
Most of Steiner Leisure's (Nasdaq: STNR) spa services take place
afloat on cruise ships, and vacationers are putting off their
bon voyages. Steiner is now talking down third and fourth
quarter projections. The company, which also sells its own line
of spa products and runs a few massage schools, feels it has a
good grip on its long-term fundamentals. Unfortunately, the bad
news in the near term is sure to rub Wall Street the wrong way.

Flat is where it's at. Flat panel display maker Kopin (Nasdaq:
KOPN) bucked the trend by raising its third-quarter projections.
Strong demand for its III-V and CyberDisplay imaging devices has
the company expecting a 25% sequential increase in revenue and a
loss of $0.15 to $0.17 a share. That's on the low end of analyst
estimates.

Recession-resistant and sometimes even caffeine free, soda
investors can have a Coke (NYSE: KO) and a smile this morning as
the carbonated fizz giant is on target to meet its 2001 marks.
Thanks to robust consumption in the Asia and Africa markets the
company expects volume growth to come in between 4% and 5% this
year.

Free in flight, AMR (NYSE: AMR) Chariman Donald Carty announced
that he would forgo all compensation -- including his salary --
for the rest of the year. Given the troubled state of the
airline industry in general, and AMR's American Airlines in
particular, it's more a token gesture than a way to reverse the
company's possible billion-dollar shortfall this year.

There is no easy chair in the office furniture industry. With
sales falling 25% over the past year and orders off by a third,
Herman Miller (Nasdaq: MLHR) reported earnings before charges of
$0.04 a share. While that is in line with analyst projections,
it comes after the company had to talk down earnings twice.
Originally the company was expected to report profits of $0.40 a
share -- essentially what it had earned the year before. Herman
Miller also announced that it would be letting 2,600 employees
go, which poses the question: What will the company do with all
that office furniture?

-----------------------------------------------------------------
POST OF THE DAY
-----------------------------------------------------------------

THE WEEKEND
"I have been reading for days now that economists are worried
about "consumer confidence", that a recession is "inevitable".
My wife and I have thought it over and have decided to decline
the invitation to the recession. We won't be attending."

>>FULL POST:
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=502956

=================================================================

SPONSORED BY: ShareBuilder
Buy stocks for just $3!
Make dollar-based investments in the stocks and index
shares you choose for just $3 per transaction.
Or, pay $8 per month for unlimited stock buys.
http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=502957

=================================================================

My Portfolio: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=502958
My Discussion Boards: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=502959

WANNA TAKE THE SHORTCUT?
Check out our new Crash Courses, the fastest way to get
your finances in order. Get results in less than an hour, for
just $10. Try one today!
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=502960

PERKS FOR FOOLS ONLY
Get free stuff and special offers, just for you!
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=502961

CUSTOMER SERVICE
Ask our staff for help with email delivery problems.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=502962

UNSUBSCRIBE
Here's how to unsubscribe or change your settings.
http://www.fool.com/community/freemail/freemaillogin.asp?email=benjamin.rogers@enron.com

_________________________________________________________________
Copyright (c) 1995-2001 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved.
Legal Information: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=502963

MsgId: msg-8491-2001-09-25_9-21-36-3369629_2_Plain_MessageAddress.msg-09:22:07(9-25-2001)
X-Version: mailer-sender-master,v 1.84
X-Version: mailer-sender-daemon,v 1.84
Message-Recipient: benjamin.rogers@enron.com


Just FYI - this is the kind of stuff I think makes this job so interesting!

---------------------- Forwarded by Kate Symes/PDX/ECT on 12/06/2000 09:27 AM
---------------------------

Tracy Ngo
12/06/2000 09:17 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: northwest power article

---------------------- Forwarded by Tracy Ngo/PDX/ECT on 12/06/2000 09:23 AM
---------------------------

Tracy Ngo
12/06/2000 09:12 AM
To: William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward
Sacks/Corp/Enron@Enron, Wendy Conwell/NA/Enron@ENRON, Veronica
Gonzalez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: northwest power article


Please do not send me the reports anymore as I do not have time to read
them.  Mark


Tom Moran has pre-approved the counterparties on the attached spreadsheet for US Freight Markets.  Please review and respond.

Thanks,
Stephanie x33465

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Moran, Tom
Sent:	Monday, October 08, 2001 2:05 PM
To:	Sever, Stephanie
Cc:	Lebrocq, Wendi
Subject:	RE: Freight EOL

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Sever, Stephanie
Sent:	Friday, September 28, 2001 9:08 AM
To:	Moran, Tom; Lebrocq, Wendi
Subject:	FW: Freight EOL

Do you have a status update on the freight counterparties listed below?

Thanks,
Stephanie
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Renaud, Lindsay
Sent:	Thursday, September 27, 2001 5:56 PM
To:	Sever, Stephanie
Subject:	FW: Freight EOL

Just following up on the status of these counterparties...no major rush, but just wanted to know where we stand.

Thanks,
Lindsay

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Renaud, Lindsay
Sent:	Friday, September 14, 2001 4:52 PM
To:	Sever, Stephanie
Cc:	Meredith, Kevin; Piotrowski, Joseph
Subject:	FW: Freight EOL

Stephanie,

As I discussed with you last week we are bringing a US Truck Freight product online. The counterparties listed below are those we would like to get pre-approval of from Credit and Legal. Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks,
Lindsay

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dicke, Scott
Sent:	Friday, September 14, 2001 4:46 PM
To:	Renaud, Lindsay
Subject:	RE: Freight EOL

Here you go:

Hub Group, Inc.
Mark VII, Inc.
Pacer International, Inc.
Landstar Logistics
Schneider National, Inc.
Penske Logistics, LLC

Scott

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Renaud, Lindsay
Sent:	Friday, September 14, 2001 1:53 PM
To:	Arnold, Matthew
Cc:	Dicke, Scott; Meredith, Kevin
Subject:	RE: Freight EOL

Matt,

This is great thanks, but do you have the full legal entity name for these Counterparties? Credit and Legal will need this.

Thanks,
Lindsay

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Arnold, Matthew
Sent:	Friday, September 14, 2001 1:22 PM
To:	Renaud, Lindsay
Cc:	Dicke, Scott
Subject:	Freight EOL

Lindsay,

Here is some preliminary information on EOL counterparties and traders:

Traders:		Matt Arnold
		Brad Romine
		Jason Beckstead
		Brian Robins

Counterparties:	The Hub Group
		Mark 7 (sub of Excel)
		Pacer
		Landstar
		Schneider Trucking
		Penske Logistics, LLC

Thanks.


Jeff,
Thanks for your quick response. What would you need from us to get the documents prepared for notification.

Thanks

Richard


I see that Shemin is out until next week.  Since you are becoming a law guru you might know the answer to this question.  The following document is an order from the court.  Does that mean it has been filed and is in effect now?


Critical Migration Information:

1. Your scheduled Outlook Migration Date is THE EVENING OF : May 23rd
2. You need to press the "Save My Data" button (only once) to send us your
pre-migration information.
3. You must be connected to the network before you press the button.
4. If a POP-UP BOX appears, prompting you to "ABORT, CANCEL OR TRUST SIGNER"
please  select TRUST SIGNER.
5. Any information you Add to your Personal Address Book, Journal or calendar
after you click on the button will need to be manually re-added into Outlook
after you have been migrated.
6. Clicking this button does not complete your migration to Outlook. Your
migration will be completed  the evening of your migration date.

    Failure to click on the button means you WILL NOT get your Calendar,
Contacts, Journal and ToDo information imported into Outlook the day of your
migration and could result in up to a 2 week delay to restore this
information.

If you encounter any errors please contact the resolution center @
713-853-1411


I have changed the dates and prices in these agreements, but those should be the only changes necessary.  Let me know if either of you see any other changes that are necessary.

Brian, let's get together this afternoon and see if we can organize our other capacity release transactions that need to be completed by December 1.  Does 3:00 your time work?


---------------------- Forwarded by Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron on 03/21/2000
02:45 PM ---------------------------

Steven Harris
03/21/2000 01:37 PM
To: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Meeting - Order 637 issues related to imbalances

I have an outside meeting that day. Thanks.

 Steve

SUSAN SCOTT
03/21/2000 10:43 AM
Sent by: Janet Cones
To: Lindy Donoho/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Darrell Schoolcraft/ET&S/Enron@ENRON,
Richard Hanagriff/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON,
Lorraine Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, TK
Lohman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Christine Stokes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven
Harris/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Bob Burleson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Audrey Robertson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Meeting - Order 637 issues related to imbalances

We have a meeting scheduled Thursday, March 23 from 11:00 a.m. until 1:00
p.m. in 4194 regarding Order 637 issues related to imbalances.  It is not
mandatory for everyone in TW Commercial to attend, but let me know ASAP if
you will be attending so I can order lunch.

Thanks,

Janet - ext. 31540


Actually, the deal is for 773/day @ into CPA via the Carnegie-Jefferson
interconnect.  The price is NX1 + $0.12/Dth; the contract expires 11/01/00.
 This gas only flowed for a part of February and is not flowing for  March.
CPA closed the interconnect with Carnegie for their own needs/system supply.
This gas may not flow for the rest of the contract.  CPA will only operate
the interconnect on a day-to-day basis; no firm is available.  I am to check
with CPA to see if they will do an exchange for this gas.
John

Colleen Sullivan@ECT
03/20/2000 08:58 AM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: John M Singer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robert Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joan
Veselack/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joann Collins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Wade R
Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Theresa Franklin/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Citygate Production GAS behind TCO - PLEASE READ

I see a deal on our list from CES-Wholesale which includes a deal with CNG
Field Services with a term of 8/1/99 through 8/1/00 for a monthly volume of
12,690 MMBtu, at CPA4 at a price of IF TCO Appal + $.12.  So, it appears that
this deal is ours, not CES-Retail.  Let me know if Brian thinks otherwise.

Chris Germany
03/15/2000 03:03 PM
To: Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT, John M Singer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robert
Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joan Veselack/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joann
Collins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Wade R Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Theresa
Franklin/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Citygate Production GAS behind TCO - PLEASE READ

Brian Perrone with CES is asking me if they should pay the invoice for CNG
Field Services for January.  The volume is 13,113 MMBtu at a price of $2.61.
The delivery point is Caragie/CPA at Jefferson.  I'm not sure what to tell
him.

I would have charged them $2.78 for this gas (CGAS IF plus max IT transport).

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 03/15/2000 02:57
PM ---------------------------
From: Colleen Sullivan on 03/14/2000 09:09 AM
To: Joan Veselack/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wade R
Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Joann Collins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John M Singer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steve
Jackson/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Citygate Production GAS behind TCO - PLEASE READ

In order to determine if any of this LDC production was sent to us with the
Wholesale package, I need to know who the producers are for each of the
deals, the volumes of the deals, and the term (which I can get from John
Singer).  Then we will take that information and try to match it up with the
list of deals given to us by CES with the wholesale package.  I'm assuming
that, if these deals were not entered into Sitara by Mark Friedman and the
TAGG people (meaning you had to enter them in yourself at some later point,
which it sounds like we did), they were probably not included in the
Wholesale package.  If this is the case, then the deals are not really ours
and are, presumably, CES Retail.  If CES-Retail does not want the deals, then
we will value the transactions, get together and discuss the best way to
handle them (i.e., us or EES), then propose a transfer of the deals to
Enron.

In summary, if you can get the information noted above to me, I'll take it
from there and find out if the deals have already been assigned to us or
not.  Thanks.

Joan Veselack@ENRON
03/13/2000 01:06 PM
To: Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wade R Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor
Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joann
Collins/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Citygate Production GAS behind TCO - PLEASE READ

Kathy, we may need Colleen Sullivan's interpretation of behind the citygate
production. Back in January, Noel Bartlo told me these deals stayed with CES
Retail. John Singer believes the deals stay with him at Enron. If these deals
stay with Enron, should they be at EES... since they are behind the citygate
or do they stay with Enron to reduce the TCO delivery to the citygates for
CES?  This could be a can of worms.

Colleen, what is the contract interruption? Does the citygate production
deals stay with Enron? If they stay with Enron, then does CES realize this?
Are the producers receiving two payments, one from Enron and one from CES.
Maybe this has already be discussed and decided, but I haven't heard the
official word.

Currently these citygate production deals are deducted from the citygate
delivery that CES needs. The numbers that Herndon LDC schedulers provide to
Enron are reduced by the production. I think Chris put these buy/sells in the
system to appease John and keep the Enron accounting system whole. Currently
the market demand tickets in Sitara are reduced by the citygate supply. The
pathing could be made easier by hooking up the citygate production supply to
the market demand tickets, but the market demand numbers need to be
increased. Then you could eliminate the buy/sell tickets that Chris Germany
has been creating.

However if this production gas is not Enron's, then Enron is creating a lot
of unnecessary work and the producers are probably receiving two payments.

	From:  Katherine L Kelly @ ECT                           03/13/2000 10:34 AM

To: Joan Veselack/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robert Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Wade R Price/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: CES Pool Gas

Hey guys, I wanted ya'll to see the below messages as well since these are
TCO deals.  I'm little confused now, because Wade had informed me that these
were all deals behind the citygate that John Singer had been doing and that
CES retail was pulling gas directly from these points.  We found a few like
this on CNG last week.  The way we have been handling this is to show a buy
from whomever at the citygate and hook it up as a buy/sell with CES retail.
Chris has been setting up the tickets for the sell to CES retail, but right
now he's priorities are just a bit different.  I guess why I'm a little
confused on these is that when I pulled up the Phoenix Dominion it has the
pool attached to the deal and not one of the CPA's.

Wade - Do you know whether deal 142669 is pool or a citygate deal?  If it's
pool, I don't know how we could have missed this all month because we would
have had to nominate it in Navigator.

Joanie - Do you have any insight into this?

---------------------- Forwarded by Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT on 03/13/2000
10:14 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Katherine L Kelly                           03/13/2000 09:58 AM

To: Wade R Price/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Robert Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: CES Pool Gas

I'm sorry Wade, but there definitely seems to be a problem with manpower
around here.  Chris is in charge of handling all of the CES retail, so he
needs to set up the corresponding sales and price them.  My hands are kind of
tied on the pathing until he is able to complete his end.

Also, I will try to follow up on these, but since these are TCO points,
please feel free to send further TCO issues to Robert Allwein.  I have only
been so heavily involved in the CNG because Molly LaFuze has been out on
vacation.

---------------------- Forwarded by Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT on 03/13/2000
09:52 AM ---------------------------

Chris Germany
03/13/2000 09:49 AM
To: Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryce Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Colleen
Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: CES Pool Gas

Sorry guys.  I'm still working on the February invoice to CES.  I estimate
that everyday this invoice does not get out cost Enron about $4,000 a day.
Feel free to call my boss Scott Neal about the problems you are having.

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 03/13/2000 09:46
AM ---------------------------

Wade R Price
03/13/2000 09:33 AM
To: Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Bryce Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: CES Pool Gas

John Singer told me these two producers' deals expired 12/31/99.  We will not
need these set up.

Producer   Pipe  Status

Burkland, Richard  CPA  Deal expired 12/31/99 No need to set up

Burkland, WIlliam S  CPA  Deal expired 12/31/99 No need to set up

What is the status on these producers ?  I have invoices and I need to pay
these ASAP, especially Questa (they are calling).

Questa Petroleum  CPA   Deal  213088 set up with meter number per 9911 pay
statement.  Production statement for volumes
      received from John Singer 3/8/00

Phoenix Dominion  CPA/Cipco Deal 142669  Producer invoice available for
information

T & F Operating  PennFuel Invoice in. Deal not set up. Not able to identify
which Penn Fuel (56 or 56W) on CGAS


Veronica:  per your request.  Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT on 06/21/2000 10:21
AM ---------------------------

Heather Choate
06/21/2000 10:25 AM
To: Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Alex Saldana/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Patti Sullivan - airline ticket

   Randy,

   Please confirm by forwarding this email to Veronica Thompson in Accounts
Payable...

   That you agree Patti Sullivan did not go as planned to Colorado Springs
and should be reimbursed the
   amount of $242.17 for those charges that were billed to her American
Express.

    Thank you,
    Heather Choate, x33278


Yes! Believe me, I can't wait!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 11:46 AM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

early this week i hope

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 10:30 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

okay, I will...this week!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 10:29 AM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

prove it

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 10:28 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

you are the big cheese to me baby!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 10:27 AM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

i dont really know what he is going to do, i thought i was always the big cheese

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 10:26 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

REALLY, where is he going? Are you going to be the big cheese now?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 10:25 AM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

i am staying also but john is not

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 10:25 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

no he's staying...what about you?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 10:24 AM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

me too, is chris leaving

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 10:24 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

I wish...that would be my dream job!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 10:23 AM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

really, so who then, me?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 10:23 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

yeah, but I don't know for who...I don't think I will be working for Chris.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 10:22 AM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

im glad to hear that, so are you going to be doing the same thing

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 10:21 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

Not at all...I just now got my offer letter...FINALLY.  What about you? Anything exciting?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 10:20 AM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:

anything exciting going on over there


This weekend marks the first employee move into our new office building, Enron Center South.

Approximately 400 Enron Global Markets employees will occupy the building's 3rd floor next Monday.  In the ensuing six weeks another 1,500 employees from Enron Industrial Markets, Enron Net Works, and our Power and Gas Marketers will follow, occupying levels 4, 5, and 6.

We know all employees are curious to experience this exciting new space.  HOWEVER, since Enron only has an occupancy permit for these specific floors, including limited access corridors from the skywalk, we ask that:

ONLY EMPLOYEES WHO ARE ASSIGNED OFFICE SPACE IN THE NEW BUILDING AND EMPLOYEES WITH STRICT BUSINESS NEEDS TO ACCESS OCCUPIED SPACE ARE PERMITTED TO BE IN THE NEW BUILDING.

Your compliance is appreciated and will assist in our ability to effectively conduct business by not over crowding newly occupied areas with visitors.  In addition, the balance of the building remains under construction and employees are strictly prohibited from entering these areas.

We are planning an open house in late Nov. or early Dec. so that every employee has the opportunity to see for themselves what is truly a world class commercial trading environment.  Thank you for your cooperation.

Office of the Chairman


Start Date: 1/29/02; HourAhead hour: 7;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002012907.txt


Attached, please find a transcript from Governor Davis' press conference
yesterday during which he announced the signing of SBX 5 and ABX 29.
The press conference dealt with a variety of issues.

http://www.governor.ca.gov/state/govsite/gov_htmldisplay.jsp?BV_SessionID=@@@@
1424090196.0987090193@@@@&BV_EngineID=falkikghjlebemfcfkmchcng.0&sCatTitle=Pre
ss+Release&sFilePath=/govsite/press_release/2001_04/20010411_transcript_of_SB5
x_AB29x_bill_signing.html&sTitle=GOVERNOR+GRAY+DAVIS+SIGNS+LANDMARK+ENERGY+CON
SERVATION+PACKAGE%0aAPRIL+11,+2001%0a&iOID=14336


Give me a call.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


More depressing news from CA, We should discuss at mroning call if we want to
take any action on this.

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 02/13/2001 11:13 PM -----

	"Les Spahnn" <spahnn@hnks.com>
	02/13/2001 08:02 PM

		 To: "Dian M. Grueneich" <dgrueneich@gralegal.com>, "Aaron Thomas"
<athomas@newenergy.com>
		 cc: <dhunter@smithandkempton.com>, <rick.counihan@greenmountain.com>,
<brbarkovich@earthlink.net>, <wbooth@booth-law.com>, <drothrock@cmta.net>,
<jackson_gualco@gualcogroup.com>, <kmills@cfbf.com>, <kmccrea@sablaw.com>,
<mshames@ucan.org>, <mday@gmssr.com>, <lga@mother.com>, <mflorio@turn.org>,
<nplotkin@tfglobby.com>, <wlarson@calstate.edu>, <vincent.stewart@ucop.edu>,
<gharrison@calstate.edu>, <sgovenar@govadv.com>, <hgovenar@govadv.com>,
<smccubbi@enron.com>, <lhastings@cagrocers.com>, <theo@ppallc.com>,
<cra@calretailers.com>, <mmoretti@calhealth.org>, <wbrown@lhom.com>,
<randy_britt@robinsonsmay.com>, <dominic.dimare@calchamber.com>,
<vjw@ceert.org>, <rcavanagh@nrdc.org>, <rochmanm@spurr-remac.org>,
<rrichter@calhealth.org>, <ken_pietrelli@ocli.com>, <dennis.flatt@kp.org>,
<richard.seguin@kp.org>, <arm@phaser.com>, <djsmith@smithandkempton.com>,
<john.redding@gene.GE.com>, <jbradley@svmg.org>, <wally@laedc.org>,
<jcondie@calrest.org>, <jmr@ka-pow.com>, <aprea.company@worldnet.att.net>,
"Jody London" <jlondon@gralegal.com>
		 Subject: Re: Rumour of CPUC Action on AB 1 Direct Access Suspension Language
This Week

All:
It is my understanding, from good sources in the Govs office that the Gov
will order Loretta Lynch to expeditiously implement the provision to suspend
all parties auhtority to enter into direct access contracts.  The premise
with which the administartion is acting is that if they expeditiously
suspend everyone's right to bilateral contracts quickly, it sets up a
barrier which the direct access coalition must break through.  In other
words the table is set.  Deal your meal from where the dishes are located.
I.E. the Davis Administration wants to place all direct access advocates in
the position of having to justify why each and every party should be the
exception to the suspension rather than have a general rule concerning how
direct access should work for all parties.  It clearly gives the Admin a
very strong upper hand to control who when and where direct access can occur
without having to say that they oppose direct access.  Power be where power
lies.
----- Original Message -----
From: Dian M. Grueneich <dgrueneich@gralegal.com>
To: Aaron Thomas <athomas@newenergy.com>
Cc: <dhunter@smithandkempton.com>; <rick.counihan@greenmountain.com>;
<brbarkovich@earthlink.net>; <wbooth@booth-law.com>; <drothrock@cmta.net>;
<jackson_gualco@gualcogroup.com>; <kmills@cfbf.com>; <kmccrea@sablaw.com>;
<mshames@ucan.org>; <mday@gmssr.com>; <lga@mother.com>; <mflorio@turn.org>;
<nplotkin@tfglobby.com>; <spahnn@hnks.com>; <wlarson@calstate.edu>;
<vincent.stewart@ucop.edu>; <gharrison@calstate.edu>; <sgovenar@govadv.com>;
<hgovenar@govadv.com>; <smccubbi@enron.com>; <lhastings@cagrocers.com>;
<theo@ppallc.com>; <cra@calretailers.com>; <mmoretti@calhealth.org>;
<wbrown@lhom.com>; <randy_britt@robinsonsmay.com>;
<dominic.dimare@calchamber.com>; <vjw@ceert.org>; <rcavanagh@nrdc.org>;
<rochmanm@spurr-remac.org>; <rrichter@calhealth.org>;
<ken_pietrelli@ocli.com>; <dennis.flatt@kp.org>; <richar
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 6:45 PM
Subject: Rumour of CPUC Action on AB 1 Direct Access Suspension Language
This Week

> Hello All:
>
> I have just heard that there is a rumor that the CPUC may act this week
under
> AB 1X to enact the Direct Access suspension.
>
> Has anyone else heard this rumor?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dian Grueneich
> Grueneich Resource Advocates
> tel: (415) 834-2300
> fax: (415) 834-2310
>
> Aaron Thomas wrote:
>
> > Hello All
> >
> > Sorry for the delay in getting the revisions we discussed on the call
> > earlier this week and the revisions that Karen and Dorthy worked out to
> > completely separate this issue from a customer's right to self generate
> > (disconnected or parallel).  I have also included the edit that Calpine
> > suggested via e-mail regarding the department's right to payment for
power
> > sold.
> >
> > We were told by Bowen's office that there will be no meeting on
Friday --
> > they did not say when they were planning to pull together the all party
> > meeting.
> >
> > A number of us have been approached by the Restaurant Association
> > regarding their problems with the 100 kW threshold.
> >
> > I think it would be a good idea for us together by conference call to
> > discuss the Restaurant Association's concerns.  Additionally, I would
like
> > to make sure we have gotten everyone's edits and discuss the questions
> > that came up at the CESG meeting or any last comments or suggestions.
> >
> > For example, I would like to raise a problem I see with section d and I
> > would like to discuss the concept of municipal aggregation for commodity
> > service in the context of Bowen's bill.
> >
> > I have set up a conference call for Friday at 3 PM.
> >
> > HOST/LEADER:                    Aaron Thomas
> > DATE:                                   February 9, 2001
> > TIME:                                   3:00PM (PST)
> > IN-DIAL NUMBER:                 415-217-0050
> > PASSCODE:                               NO PASSCODE NECESSARY
>


I would only add the ongoing cash collateral issue in Canada (and run spell
check).


Steve,

When filling out the feedback form I misread you as my supervisor and I
filled out the form referring to you.  I said pretty good things about you,
you should not, repeat SHOULD NOT believe what I said.  I was just trying to
help you out with your supervisor.

Regarding  Rick.  I can tell you that I respect him very much.  He has shown
signs of friendship beyond of what I expected.  You know that I was not very
happy with my past review but I never doubted that Rick did the best he could
given the information that he had.  I never doubted his integrity or
qualifications.

Rick is an outstanding leader and manager.  He has the ability of managing a
large and diverse group of people effectively and with no one ever feeling
any pressure, arrogance, etc.

Steve,  you have a great team which I have already started to miss.

Best,

Ricardo


Dr. Pecker Checker,
    I can't believe you actually called it "penis".  Jeez, the doctoring
stuff has really gotten to you.

Drow

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
FREE COLLEGE MONEY
CLICK HERE to search
600,000 scholarships!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/zoU8wD/4m7CAA/ySSFAA/Vk9qlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

At Homecoming 2000, the BETA TENT had the biggest crowd by far.  Stay connected and consider a future homecoming BETA reunion.  It's incredible...forget the 20 years in between...everyone just seems to pick it up right where they left off years ago.

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


Savett Frutkin Podell & Ryan, P.C. Announces Class Action Lawsuit Against
Azurix Corp.

10/16/2000
Business Wire
(Copyright (c) 2000, Business Wire)

PHILADELPHIA--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Oct. 16, 2000--Savett Frutkin Podell & Ryan,
P.C. hereby gives notice that a class action complaint was filed in the
United States District Court, Southern District of Texas on behalf of a class
of persons who purchased the common stock of Azurix Corp. (NYSE:AZX)
("Azurix" or the "Company") at artificially inflated prices during the period
June 9, 1999 through August 8, 2000 and traceable to Azurix's Initial Public
Offering ("Class Period") and who were damaged thereby.
If you are a member of the proposed Class, you should contact this firm at
the telephone number or address below. If you wish to be appointed lead
plaintiff in this action you must file a motion with the Court no later
December 5, 2000. Class members must meet certain legal requirements to serve
as a lead plaintiff.
If you purchased Azurix common stock during the Class Period or have
questions or information regarding this action or your rights, you may call
or write Barbara A. Podell, Adam Savett or Renee C. Nixon, of Savett Frutkin
Podell & Ryan. P.C. at 800/993-3233 or via e-mail at sfprpc@op.net.
The complaint charges Azurix and certain of its senior officers and directors
with violations of Sections 11, 12(a)(2) and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933
("Securities Act") and Sections 10(b) and 20 of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 ("Exchange Act") and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder.
The complaint also charges Enron Corp. as a controlling person under Section
15 of the Securities Act and Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act. The complaint
alleges that during the Class Period, defendants disseminated to the
investing public false and misleading financial statements and press releases
concerning the Company's publicly reported financial condition and future
prospects.
The complaint further alleges that defendants issued to the public on or
about June 9, 1999, in connection with the Company's initial public offering,
a false and misleading registration statement and prospectus. These documents
touted the Company's primary business strategy - acquiring, owning, operating
and managing large privatization water supply and wastewater projects.
However, through a series of partial disclosures beginning on March 30, 2000
and ending on August 8, 2000, it was revealed that several large
privatization projects were already postponed or canceled at or near the time
of the IPO. As a result of defendants' misrepresentations the price of Azurix
common stock was artificially inflated throughout the Class Period.
Plaintiff seeks to recover damages on behalf of all purchasers of Azurix
common stock during the Class Period. The plaintiff is represented by Savett
Frutkin Podell & Ryan, P.C. which has extensive experience representing
shareholders in class actions and has successfully recovered hundreds of
millions of dollars for defrauded investors and shareholders.
The reputation and expertise of the firm in shareholder and other class
action litigation has been repeatedly recognized by the courts, which have
appointed the firm to major positions in complex class action litigations.

CONTACT: SAVETT FRUTKIN PODELL & RYAN, P.C. Barbara A. Podell Adam T. Savett
Renee C. Nixon Telephone: 215/923-5400 or 800/993-3233 E-mail: sfprpc@op.net
12:12 EDT OCTOBER 16, 2000

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Attached is the Enron Americas Gas Trading violation memo for Maturity Gap
Risk for June 1, 2001.  The Office of the Chairman for Enron Americas is
responsible for printing out a hard copy of this memo, signing it and
returning the hard copy to Chris Abel at 3155A who will forward it to RAC to
obtain their signature.


A lunch meeting has been scheduled for Friday, May 5, 2000, from 12:00 p.m.
until 1:30 p.m. in 30C2 to go through in detail how the ISDA and CSA Masters
and Schedules work.

Please reply as soon as possible if you are going to attend this lunch
meeting (for catering purposes).  Thanks.


Today, Enron hosted a conference call to give investors a current overview of the company. Here's an update of what we discussed during the call.

We told investors that we're doing everything we can to protect their interests and to regain their confidence. Our focus remains on our credit quality, balance sheet and liquidity, which are essential for our continued success and expansion of our wholesale businesses.

It took more than a few weeks to get where we are today. Here's a snapshot of significant events that led to our current situation:

-- In hindsight, we definitely made some very bad investments in our non-core businesses over the past several years. Those include investments in Azurix, India and Brazil. They have performed far worse that we could have ever imagined when we made these investments;

-- Because of these bad investments, we've become over-leveraged as a company. The negative impact of those investments was exacerbated through the extensive use of debt capital both on and off our balance sheet;

-- We also entered into related party transactions that led to a loss of investor confidence, which has been very damaging;

-- We've been criticized for our lack of transparency and our hard-to-understand financial and operating disclosures; and

-- On top of it all, we discovered errors in our financial statements, as discussed in our 8-K filing last week, that required a restatement of previously reported earnings.

We've taken a new look at our businesses and have separated them into three areas: core businesses, non-core businesses, and businesses under review.

Core Businesses

Our core businesses remain strong and consistent sources of significant earnings and cash flows for the company. They're our competitive advantage. These include:

-- Natural gas pipeline businesses;

-- Gas and power businesses in North America and Europe;

-- Retail businesses in North America and Europe; and

-- Coal businesses in North America and Europe.

The events of the past few weeks have had a temporary negative impact on our projected fourth quarter profitability. It's too early to tell at this time what impact this might have on our operating results. We are considering these actions now so that we can quickly return to normal business in 2002.

I also remain optimistic that the actions we've taken over the past couple of weeks have addressed our customer and counterparty credit and liquidity concerns. According to our business unit leaders, we have definitely seen improvement in our counterparty relationships.

Non-Core Businesses

Our non-core businesses include our global assets group and our broadband division. We have invested more than $8 billion in these businesses, and the return from them has been dismal.

We have an aggressive program in place to exit these businesses and expect that the sale of these businesses will generate billions of dollars in cash that we can use to repay debt and reinvest in our core businesses. We already have more than $800 million in assets contracted for sale this year. They include CEG Rio, a gas LDC in Brazil; EcoElectrica, a power plant and LNG receiving terminal in Puerto Rico; and asset sales of offshore oil and gas properties in India. The approximately $2.9 billion Portland General sale is also on target to close in late 2002 pending regulatory approvals.

Businesses Under Review

These businesses are comprised of those operations outside our power and gas wholesale businesses and include global and industrial markets. While several of these businesses have very strong future prospects, we need to determine if their capital requirements and near-term growth prospects are sufficient enough in terms of earnings and cash generation.

Reviewing our businesses this way will help determine where we need to make reductions to our work force. More information will follow as soon as it becomes available.

Credit Rating/10-Q Filing

We continue to meet regularly with credit rating agencies and believe that our liquidity enhancements and scheduled asset sales will strengthen our balance sheet and maintain our investment grade credit rating. Our current credit ratings by the three major rating agencies are as follows:

-- Moody's at Baa3       "Under Review for Further Downgrade"

-- Fitch at BBB-             "Evolving Status"

-- S&P at BBB-              "CreditWatch Negative"

We also discussed our existing financial vehicles, including Osprey, Marlin and Yosemite, in further detail. We told investors that we will file our 10-Q five days late due to our current activities. It will be filed on Nov. 19.

We will continue to have updates with investors over the coming weeks as well as our frequent updates with you. The full transcript of our conference call will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in the next few days. It will also be posted on our web site at www.enron.com/corp/investors under "SEC Filings."

In connection with the proposed transactions, Dynegy and Enron will file a joint proxy statement/prospectus with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Investors and security holders are urged to carefully read the joint proxy statement/prospectus regarding the proposed transactions when it becomes available, because it will contain important information. Investors and security holders may obtain a free copy of the joint proxy statement/prospectus (when it is available) and other documents containing information about Dynegy and Enron, without charge, at the SEC's web site at www.sec.gov. Copies of the joint proxy statement/prospectus and the SEC filings that will be incorporated by reference in the joint proxy statement/prospectus may also be obtained for free by directing a request to either: Investor Relations, Dynegy Inc., 1000 Louisiana, Suite 5800, Houston, TX 77002, Phone: (713) 507-6466, Fax: (713) 767-6652; or Investor Relations, Enron Corp., Enron Building, 1400 Smith Street, Houston, TX 77002, Phone: (713) 853-3956, Fax: (713) 646-3302.

In addition, the identity of the persons who, under SEC rules, may be considered "participants in the solicitation" of Dynegy and Enron shareholders in connection with the proposed transactions, and any description of their direct or indirect interests, by security holdings or otherwise, are available in an SEC filing under Schedule 14A made by each of Dynegy and Enron.


Friday, April 27, 2001

Dear MATHEW,

Travelocity's Fare Watcher, your ultimate tool for keeping on top of
rapidly changing air fares, found fare changes in 2 of the markets
you are watching.  When you review the airfares below, remember that
fares change rapidly!  Low fares sell out quickly, and the sooner you
check, the more likely you are to find available seats.

Have your travel needs changed? Are you looking to go someplace new?
Remember to update your Fare Watcher subscription so that you're
always notified when fares change to your favorite destinations.

To find one of the fares below, point your web browser to your
Personal Fare Watcher Page on Travelocity by clicking on the
following URL link.  You can also copy and paste the URL into your
browser.

http://dps1.travelocity.com:80/fwemindiv.ctl?fw=05J9G74|TRAVELOCITY

==================   FARES  ============================

*  IAH-SFO   FROM: HOUSTON-BUSH INTERCO (IAH)
             TO:   SAN FRANCISCO, CA (SFO)
   PRICE:    NEW PRICE      WAS      DIFFERENCE
             ---------    -------    ----------
             $258.00      $158.00     +$100.00

*  IAH-NYC   FROM: HOUSTON-BUSH INTERCO (IAH)
             TO:   NEW YORK ALL AIRPRTS (NYC)
   PRICE:    NEW PRICE      WAS      DIFFERENCE
             ---------    -------    ----------
             $260.00      $158.00     +$102.00

See below for important information on these fares.
===========  OF SPECIAL INTEREST ==============

Get Travel Protection - PROTECT YOUR TRIP! Check it out at http://direct.travelocity.com/adclick/CID=00001612a85ff39500000000/exclusive=travelres.generic.fwem.position2

========  Travelocity Hotel Value Rates  =============

Travelocity.com offers Value Rates at great hotels in:

NEW YORK ALL AIRPRTS (NYC) starting at just $69
Click: http://dps1.travelocity.com:80/hotsrqst.ctl?mode=2&airport=NYC&rate_cat=V

===================   VACATIONS AND CRUISE PACKAGES ======

VACATION DEALS! Hot deals to the Caribbean, LAs Vegas, and more!
Check out our daily offerings of deals for vacation packages and tours.
See all of the great deals right now at
http://leisure.travelocity.com/RealDeals/0,2942,TRAVELOCITY_VAC,00.html

CRUISE DEALS! Don't miss a look at our incredible Cruise Deals!
Updated daily, this area features the best cruise rates to a host of fabulous
ports of call.  Find the voyage that suits your budget at
http://leisure.travelocity.com/RealDeals/0,2942,TRAVELOCITY_CRU,00.html

=====================   EXCLUSIVE MEMBER BENEFITS     ================

Introducing the Travelocity Preferred Traveler Program.
Get exclusive members-only savings including: 5% off Travelocity GoodBuy Fares, airline club lounge passes, $15 off Hertz weekly rentals, up to 20% off at 7,000 restaurants nationwide, and much more.  Receive a free weekender bag when you enroll today.
Visit http://leisure.travelocity.com/preferredtraveler/?source=PM.
 .
The NEW Travelocity World MasterCard
Earn points towards free travel with the new Travelocity World MasterCard!  You'll earn 1 point for every dollar spent.  Earn 8,000 points and you'll receive $100 off your next Travelocity.com booking.  Well spot you 4,000 points to get you started, so you're already half way there! Visit  http://www.travelocitycard.com to apply.

=====================   CUSTOMER SERVICE  ==================

IMPORTANT FARE INFORMATION:
  All fares are quoted in US Dollars.  Fares shown are for one
  adult round-trip between your selected cities and are subject
  to additional charges, including, but not limited to, Passenger
  Facility Charges (ranging from $2-$18), Federal Segment Fees of
  $2.75 per segment (defined as a takeoff and a landing), and
  taxes/fees associated with international itineraries of up to
  USD $113 or local currency equivalent. Fuel surcharges, if applicable
  are included in the fees listed.

  Total fare per passenger, including all charges, will always
  be displayed to you prior to final ticket purchase. Please note
  that fares are subject to restrictions, may not be available on
  all flights, and may change without notice. For detailed descriptions
  of the fare rules, click on the corresponding rules link.

HOW DO I:

* CHANGE OR CANCEL MY SUBSCRIPTION TO FAREWATCHER EMAIL?-

http://dps1.travelocity.com:80/fwemsub.ctl?Service=TRAVELOCITY

* ?PDATE MY EMAIL ADDRESS?

http://dps1.travelocity.com:80/fwemsub.ctl?Service=TRAVELOCITY

* RETRIEVE MY PASSWORD?

http://dps1.travelocity.com:80/lognpwdform.ctl?Service=TRAVELOCITY


---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 01/30/2001 09:38 AM
---------------------------

From:  Bryan Hull
01/30/2001 09:22 AM

To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael Walters/HOU/ECT@ECT, O'Neal D
Winfree/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Denver
Plachy/NA/Enron@Enron, reagan_mathews@enron.net, Timothy Blanchard/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Game @ 6:00

Let me know if you are going to be there tomorrow or not.


John is currently in Mumbai, India.

Regent Hotel - Mumbai (April 16 - April 21)
Phone: 011 91 22 655 1234
Fax:  011 91 22 651 4488

Office Numbers in Mumbai:
Phone: 011 91 22 653 4011
Fax:  011 91 22 653 4024/25

Saturday, April 21, 2001

01:45am     Depart Mumbai on Delta Airlines #107
07:20am     Arrive Frankfurt
10:40am Depart Frankfurt on United Airlines #3542
02:40pm Arrive Houston

NOTE: You may also reach John on his cellular: 281-948-7273.  India's local
time is 10.5 hours ahead of us.


Thanks!  My friend Donna called me yesterday and we were just talking about Carson.

On a slightly different note, can I take you up on your offer to call Ofelia about not showing up on Thanksgiving Day?

Sara

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ogden, Mary
Sent:	Friday, November 16, 2001 11:12 AM
To:	Shackleton, Sara
Subject:	Carson Llewellyn info

Sara:  Here's the updated info I promised re Carson:

R. Carson Llewellyn
14027 Memorial Drive #301
Houston, TX  77079

Email: carson@carsonL.com

Phone:  281-679-8822
Cell Phone:  281-435-3672
Fax:  281-679-8823


If I am reading this correctly, it appears that rather than provide an
adjustment for decremental units relieving local congestion, they will be
required to either pay the market clearing price of energy for the zone or
redispatch another unit in the same zone to counter act the decremental
instruction.

I believe we can support this change as long as few questions are properly
handled:

If there are multiple units that can clear the local congestion problem, who
gets selected?  (best shift factor, submitted dec bids, ERCOT flips a coin?)

If a generator fails to follow this instruction will it properly show up as
an uninstructed deviation, or will ERCOT follow performance to these direct
instructions some other way?

Can this similar methodology be used on the incremental side to curb abuse
by those who manipulate their resource plans to create congestion they will
be the only resource to correct?

Have a great day!

> ----------
> From:
> manuel-munoz@reliantenergy.com[SMTP:manuel-munoz@reliantenergy.com]
> Sent:  Sunday, November 26, 2000 7:45 PM
> To:  isonp@ercot.com; piwg@ercot.com; operations@ercot.com
> Cc:  kevin-gresham@reliantenergy.com; Brenda_B_Harris@reliantenergy.com
> Subject:  Suggested Solution to the PUC's Concerns Regarding Local
> Congestion
>
> <<File: Adib103100>><<File: stoft-game.pdf>><<File:
> stoft-intra-zonal.pdf>>
> In a memo from Parvis Adib dated Oct. 31 (copy attached), the PUC
> describes
> a serious concern on the part of the Commission regarding market abuse
> through relieving Local Congestion under the current Protocols. John Meyer
> has asked me to draft a suggested solution to this concern. I am
> recommending the following solution and believe it should be very easy to
> implement.
>
> THE PROBLEM: Gaming whereby an entity deliberately and chronically places
> itself in a situation to create local congestion in order to profit from
> instructions to decrement its energy deliveries.
>
> The current language states that when a resource  is instructed to
> decrement its energy deliveries and a Market Solution does not exist the
> resource's QSE will pay the minimum of the MCPE for that zone or 0. The
> trouble with this approach is that if the MCPE is negative the QSE is
> rewarded for having a resource causing local congestion. If the situation
> persisted over time this could encourage inefficient generation to be
> built
> on the same area so that it can profit by having its output reduced or
> even
> turned off.
>
> Note that this would only happen in a situation where the local congestion
> is located within a zone that is also susceptible to CSC congestion as
> well
> and the QSEs in such a zone are decremented most of the time which leads
> to
> high incidence of negative MCPE for the zone. This does not appear likely
> but could occur if a zone is relatively small; i.e., dominated by QSEs
> that
> are few in number and that consistently overschedule across a CSC zone
> with
> the anticipation that they will always be instructed to decrement energy
> in
> real time.
>
> RECOMMENDED SOLUTION :
>
> Do not compensate or charge a resource that is instructed to decrement its
> energy deliveries by ERCOT when a Market Solution does not exist in
> relieving local congestion.  However, the resource must obey the
> instruction in order to maintain system reliability.
>
> Please give me your comments on this solution concept  before Dec. 1. I
> am
> recommending that we add this as an item to vote on at the RUG meeting
> scheduled for Dec. 6. I will also draft the recommended language changes
> (very minor) to sections 6 and 7 and distribute it prior to the meeting.
>
> Manny
>
>
> (See attached file: Adib103100)
>
> (See attached file: stoft-game.pdf)
>
> (See attached file: stoft-intra-zonal.pdf)
>
>


Please coordinate a meeting next week between Don Hawkins, myself and Rod Hayslett for Don & I to discuss a proposal for NNG Measurement with Rod.


Rick/Jim,
I agree with Emilio that we have a great project supporter in the Governor. He clearly understood the importance of having a gas project, sooner rather than later, and that we are not requesting any special treatment, in terms of taxes, royalties, as opposed to our competing project, the Venezuelan LNG. Moreover, we recognized that this project, due to the pricing formula defined with PDVSA, will likely pay a higher price for the gas than the domestic market will (and never lower)  and therefore is good business for Venezuela.

In the conversation with the Minister of Energy and Mines (he was even willing to call Chavez at that very same moment), the Minister acknowledged that no decision, either positive or negative, was already made. The roadblock is the availability of gas, which under very conservative scenarios analyzed by Petroleos de Venezuela, is not such. The decision, therefore, is political.

I think it was an excellent meeting. Thye governor even suggested additional businesses such as arranging the financing for a stadium, in the way we did with the Enron field, and also the purchase of fertilizer (this is one of the most important states in terms of agriculture). I will forward this info to the appropriate people.

In an unrelated matter, I am working on a proposal to the Venezuelan Gov't, through the Ministry of Energy and Mines, to sell some power plants that ENA is desperatedly trying to sell. I wrote a proposal for several machines, with the support of the owners, and they showed interest in a used one. 35 MM US$. I'll keep you posted.

I understand from Emilio Vicens that Chavez has not responded to Bill Richardson's letter yet. A follow-up phone call should follow. Rick, please keep me posted with Bill's efforts.

Regards,
ALF
---------------------- Forwarded by Alberto Levy/SA/Enron on 09/14/2001 02:57 PM ---------------------------
From:	Emilio Vicens/ENRON@enronXgate on 09/14/2001 10:21 AM
To:	Eric Gonzales/ENRON@enronXgate, Neal Gerstandt/ENRON@enronXgate, Guido Caranti/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:	Alberto Levy/SA/Enron@Enron

Subject:	Meeting with the Governor

The following is a brief summary of the meeting that Alberto Levy and I had yesterday with the Governor of the Anzoategui State:

1.	Initially, the meeting was scheduled for Wednesday morning but the Governor had to cancelled at the last minute because of scheduling conflicts. Alberto Levy managed to reschedule the meeting for the following day (Sept. 13);

2.	We had approximately 2 hours to present and discuss the project with the Governor in great level of detail. The first quarter of the meeting was very formal. Nevertheless, by the second quarter, we were openly discussing the issues and how could he help us move the project forward;

3.	We explained that our commercial agreements were all concluded and that PDVSA was behind our project but that, for many months now, a political battle had slow down the final approval of the project to an unacceptable point for Enron. We also explained all the efforts and meetings we had with the MEM, ENAGAS, PDVSA and other Venezuelan agencies;

4.	We also talked about other LNG development in the country and that we believe that some people favor the development of Paria (this project is in the Sucre State). He knew about the old Cristobal Colon Project and immediately understood the situation. Joking, he even said that maybe in 10 years they move the Paria Project forward;

5.	He was extremely interested in helping us in the project (mainly because of the investment and employment) and immediately asked his secretary to call the Minister of Energy & Mines. In less than five minutes, the Governor was talking (with us in his office) to the Minister about our project. He strongly told the Minister that the State was looking forward to the approval of this project as it was required to move the economy of the region. They discussed the status and the relationship with Paria, if any. According to the Governor, the Minister said that Paria and Jose were completely independent (not mutually exclusive) and that a final decision about the project was not made yet;

6.	He promised to discuss the project again with the Minister on Tuesday and push for a short-term decision as he understood Enron's situation very well;

7.	In addition, he will be meeting with President Chavez during the weekend about a number of subjects and will introduce this project in his discussions. We mentioned how important was to have Chavez on-board and he agreed. He will try to help us on it;

8.	He was very aggressive and pro-active in a positive way, mentioning that his role as Governor was to promote investment in the region at all cost. He will continue to push at all levels to see how he can help us in getting the final approval;

Finally, we clearly have a powerful and very connected friend in the Governor. We were gladly surprised to see such a pro-business, no BS individual as Governor. We have and will continue to push for his support and help in matters related to the project at the State and Federal level.

Emilio


Please contact Kristin Walsh (713) 853-9510 or Britt Whitman  (713) 345-4014
for questions.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
? California's Bond Inevitability
? Davis Faces Even Greater Financial Woes
? California's Creditor Status Debated by Court
? Windfall Profits Tax Bill (SB 1X/AB 128X) Passes Senate Vote, Davis
expected to Sign Off

California Bond Battle
SB 31X passed the Senate today by a simple majority vote, initiating the 90
day wait period on the revenue bonds issuance.  Sources indicate that
contrary to media reports, a possible referendum on the SB 31X would be
unlikely for Harvey Rosenfield to produce within 90 days due to insufficient
funding.  He reportedly would need to raise $250,000 - $500,000 very
quickly.  Sources believe that it is more likely that Harvey will attempt to
set up an initiative later this year or in 2002.

Davis Financial Woes Just Beginning
It is unclear whether Governor Davis truly will be able to move money around
within the state budget to cover power purchases until August.  Of the $13.4
billion bond amount authorized, approximately $6.7 billion has already been
spent on power.  It is likely that the state will spend more than the
remaining $6.7 billion on power before the bonds are even issued.  Sources
indicate that most of the long-term contracts Davis talks about are unsigned
and not really in place.  This means that the state may still have to
purchase the majority of power on the spot market, which further complicates
the situation.  As reported earlier, this explains why the Republicans wanted
to wait for Davis to disclose the terms of the contracts before authorizing
the bond issuance.  Given the lack of contracts in place, it appears that the
bridge loan and the bonds will be inadequate for all of the state's power
purchases.

"To Be or Not to Be," Is California a Creditor?
Sources indicate that lawyers and members of the generator community
reviewing California's revenue bond bill SB 31X, are unclear as to whether
the state of California has claims as a creditor.  It appears at this time,
that the Assembly re-wrote Senator Bowen's language so that the bill relies
on the existing interpretation of AB 1X as to when the state gets paid by the
utilities.  This exact issue is currently being reviewed in the PG&E
bankruptcy case and will most likely settle this ongoing dispute between
legislatures and utilities.

Windfall Profits Tax
According to sources, the windfall profits tax bill, SB 1X, still remains in
committee in the Assembly.  It is unclear if this bill could be brought to a
vote tomorrow given that each house has not reviewed the other's version of
the bill.  Sources further indicate that the Senate version SB 1X, has not
yet been referred to an Assembly policy committee and that a "significant
reconciliation process" between the two bills must occur.  For example,
unlike the Senate version, the Assembly version reportedly does not set a
price cap based on a firm dollar amount, but instead leaves the decision up
to a regulatory committee such as the PUC.  Once the bond issuance passes the
Senate and is officially authorized, the state will likely be able to get its
bridge loan from the lenders.  However, sources indicate that the bridge loan
is "dead" unless the Senate moves before Thursday.


Aimee,

The Global Octanes plant crashed last night.  The undertakes (volume below
the base load sale) will not go to the buyback.  This is considered a force
majeure.  Do not allow any volumes to be allocated to the buyback until
notified by either Lee Papyoti or myself.  Thanks.

D


The 2002 Plan Review with Stan for Wessex will be from 8:30-11:00 in EB 5029 on Wednesday, October 3.

Thanks

Tracy


This has not been a good informative day.  We just need to chat with Dominion to figure out how the contracts work and for me to find out more info the storage contracts.


did you get mauricio to play?
---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 11/15/2000 04:00 PM
---------------------------

Michael Simmons
11/15/2000 03:46 PM
To: Stephen Schwarzbach/Corp/Enron@Enron, Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Luis
Mena/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul J Broderick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah Goodpastor/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Christopher Chenoweth/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Mauricio Trejo/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Wed . Night scrimmage/practice

Practice tonight at  Memorial Park,  7pm.     Meet at same place as Monday
night.

IF you were at last year's scrimmage with the aggie team, this will be at the
same location.   Hopefully, the lights will be on and the fields will be
clear.   If it is raining,  the practise will be canceled.

From downtown, heading West toward 610 on Memorial,   goto Memorial Park and
make a right at the first light.  Take this road up till you see a split in
the road with a softball and soccer field on your right hand side, and beck's
prime on the left..  We will meet at the soccer/softball field for practice.

If you  goto far, further up the road you will see the golf course on your
left hand side as well as the tennis courts...

===

If   you are interested in wagering....   here are some bets that Webb
Jennings is putting out on the 1 st game.

We spot them:  Total Bet:

9 pts   $50
15 pts   $300
22 pts   $500-$600
30 pts   $1,000

He seems to be extra confident in that he has a former Division 2A
quarterback... Drew Teamlys  (sp?).


Start Date: 4/5/01; HourAhead hour: 20;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Generation schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001040520.txt

---- Generation Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE.
     Details: (Hour: 20 / Preferred:  12.00 / Final:  12.03)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: Wheelabrat
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/5/01
  UNIT_ID: MARTEL_2_AMFOR


I am currently in need of 2 analysts for a period of 2-6 months to work in
commercial business analysis roles for me related to EOTT.


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 07/11/2000 02:03
PM ---------------------------

"Thomas Mueller" <tmueller@rhm.com.mx> on 02/11/2000 08:56:50 PM
To: Kay.Mann@enron.com
cc:

Subject: [LETTER TO AI

 Kay,

it has become later than I anticipated (and wanted).
Attached is the revised letter.

Saludos
Thomas

 - 7SK01!2.DOC


November 28, 2000

Don't be GREEN with envy!  Time still remains to
take advantage of the great $99/$109 or less each
way southwest.com only offer.

Can we travel can we go?
Can we go to a show?
Should we visit our family each?
Should we hang out on a beach?
I will book it, you will see.
I will book it for you and me.
southwest.com e-Freedom, ma'am
It's the best, for sure I am.....

********* southwest.com e-Freedom Sale *********

Who: southwest.com Customers.

What: Internet Specials for $99/$109 or less each way.

Where: All cities with scheduled Southwest Airlines
 service.

When: 7-day advance purchase beginning
 at 7:00 AM CST on November 17, 2000 through
 December 1, 2000, midnight Pacific Time.
 Travel beginning November 28, 2000 through
 March 30, 2001.

Why: To give you the Freedom to move about the country.

How: Go to http://www.southwest.com/hotfares/?src=click

************************************************

Here are the details of the southwest.com Internet Special:
*Tuesday, Wednesday, and Saturday $99 or less each
way. Internet Specials are available only on southwest.com
and may be combined with any other fare type.

*Monday, Thursday, Friday, and Sunday $109 or less each
way. Internet Specials are available only on southwest.com
and may be combined with any other fare type.

All with the following restrictions:

*7-day advance purchase
*Travel November 28, 2000 through March 30, 2001.
 Florida markets will be blacked out March 15-30, 2001.
*Purchase beginning November 17 through
 December 1, 2000, midnight Pacific Time.
*southwest.com Internet Specials are available one-way or
 may be combined with any other fare.
 When combining with another fare, the
 most restrictive fare rules apply.
*Changes to any portion of the reservation
 (flight, dates, cities, and/or names of passengers),
 once purchased, will result in the cancellation of
 the ENTIRE reservation and rebooking at the lowest
 fare available which could result in a fare increase.

Fares do not include a federal excise tax of up to $2.75
that will be imposed on each flight segment of your
itinerary. A flight segment is defined as a takeoff and
a landing. The fares listed do not include airport-assessed
passenger facility charges (PFCs) of up to $12 roundtrip.

southwest.com Internet Specials are nonchangeable and
nonrefundable. *Ticketless Travel Online may only be
purchased with a credit card. Customers holding funds from
a previously unused trip on Southwest Airlines or Customers
who have Southwest Airlines vouchers will not be able to use
those forms of payment for Ticketless Travel Online.
*Unused funds may be applied toward future travel on
Southwest Airlines within one year of the original purchase date.

Seats are limited and won't be available on some
flights that operate during very busy travel times
and holiday periods.

Standby travel requires an upgrade to the
full unrestricted fare.

*************** SUBSCRIBER INFORMATION ******************
Please pass this great news on to your friends!
To subscribe to Southwest Airlines E-mail Updates,
visit http://www.southwest.com/email/

Remember, if you change your Internet service provider,
you will need to unsubscribe and resubscribe in order
to continue receiving Southwest Airlines e-mail updates.
Please visit our subscription page at:
http://www.southwest.com/email/

*********************************************************

This is a post only mailing from Southwest Airlines.
Please do not attempt to respond to this message.

Copyright 2000 Southwest Airlines Co. All Rights Reserved.

---
You are currently subscribed to special-offers as: [mark.guzman@enron.com]
You can unsubscribe anytime at http://www.southwest.com/email