hey there.  freak show central here.  this week is bad, unfortunately.
florida was awsome...and it put me in the mood to get back on the diet, and
exercise.  did you buy that watch?  you should leave the office now and get
it if you didn't, and on your way back, you should stop for a tennis lesson!

	Alexandra Saler@EES
	02/05/2001 09:09 AM

		 To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject:

how are you?  it must have been a little bit easier to come back to such
beautiful weather.  I can't wait to hear about the rest of your trip!  I had
a great weekend.  I relaxed and spent a lot of time outside which was great.
I had my best tennis lesson yesterday!  I just wish that I could play more.

let me know if you have any free time this week to get together with Mish and
I.  we could grab dinner after a run again!  I'd love to exercise if you
can.  let me know!
I think that Wednesday is good for both of us if it works for you.


The report named: Violation/Notification Memo <http://erv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=60&report_name=Violation/Notification+Memo&category_cd=2&category_name=ENRON%20CONSOLIDATED&toc_hide=1&sTV1=2&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=09/12/2001>, published as of 09/12/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


There may be a possible bust in 17.4..  Specifically please look at how the
math works on the refund due to termination.  I think that the baseline
should be the maximum liability amount, or whatever the proper term might be.

Thanks,

Kay


Start Date: 4/18/01; HourAhead hour: 19;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041819.txt


Version 2.0 of the ClickAtHome Portal is now available!
 Log into www.clickathome.net now, from work or home!

Access the PEP System through the portal!
 Choose your reviewers and fill out your evaluations in the comfort and
privacy of your home!

Outlook Web Access and eHRonline will be available SOON!

The ClickAtHome portal is fully customizable for you!
 YOU choose the content on each page, as well as the look and feel!

Note: the ClickAtHome portal must be launched through an Internet Explorer
browser, 5.0 or higher.


After more years than I care to mention, I am leaving Enron tomorrow as part of the team that's going to AEP with the sale of Houston Pipe Line Company.

I just wanted to say thanks to as many people as I could remember that helped make the time at Enron pass so quickly.  It's been great working with you!!

Best wishes

Lee

p.s. My new email will be:	llpapayoti@aep.com


I need your SS #'s for my beneficiary form.

Jerry, please forward to Don, I couldn't email him the other day.


The attached schedule is for Economic Analysis.  Dave will cover for me when
I am on vacation and vica versus.  When we are both off we will provide phone
numbers, in the event we need to come in and work.  I will be in town over
the holidays and I can be reached at 281-356-6089.

James


seminars:
(1)  11/10 and 11/11 - Structuring Power Transactions (no longer wait listed)
(2)  11/16 - Electric Business Understanding
(3)  12/2 - Corporate Finance
(4)  I would like to take 12/10 as a vacation day

Thanks.  Sara

Taffy Milligan
11/03/99 02:45 PM
To: Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marie
Heard/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shari
Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Erica Braden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kaye Ellis/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Taffy Milligan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Becky Tlucek/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: November & December Calendar - SWAP Group

Please adivse of any days you are planning to be out of the office.

Thanks,
tm


Vasant,

My preference is C, because of its portability. The hardware and operating
systems
change so fast that we have to use the most flexible
development environment.

Vince

Vasant Shanbhogue
04/26/2000 10:03 AM
To: Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Grant Masson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J
Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Zimin Lu/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: London Research Development platform

I have spoken with Bryan Seyfried and Ben Parsons on the issue of  model
development platform, esp for Credit Trading group.  People besides Ben will
be modeling in Bryan's group, and C is not a language they know.  One of them
is coding in MATLAB, and the IT group is doing Visual Basic.  IT prefers not
to support MATLAB, and would also prefer not to support C, because this would
make their life easier.  Bryan and Ben need to make a decision as to what is
the common platform of choice that is best for them, taking IT in mind.  Ben
has said that if the choice is C, he can enforce everybody learn C, and can
look into getting some function libraries (if needed).  Similarly, if the
choice is VB, he can enforce common use of VB.
We need to of course ensure that other members of Research can crosscheck the
code.
What are your thoughts on C, VB, or MATLAB?

Vasant


you think i'm going to put this in ellectronic form?  no way.

From:	Jennifer Fraser/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/19/2001 01:17 PM
To:	John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:	please fill in--i lost the scrap of paper

	arnold
May-01
Jun-01
Jul-01
Aug-01
Sep-01
Oct-01
Nov-01
Dec-01
Jan-02

Jen Fraser
Enron Global Markets Fundamentals
713-853-4759


Please refer to Enron Tag #23876.  The path is

BHPLGS gen @ BHPLSYSTEM- BHPL (T) BHPL/STGL - BHPLGS - MEAN - LAPT(T)STEGW/DAVEJOHNSTON - MEAN - MIRANT- PPW(T)DAVEJOHNSTON/4C3- MIRANT- EPMI- APS(T)4C3/WW5 - EPMI- CRSPM1 - WALC(T)WW5/WW2- WALC(T)WW2/COOLADGE- CRSPM1 load @ COOLADGE.

We had problems getting the tag approved.  This is a good path and should flow.  Both the generating and load control areas have a copy of this tag and have agreed to implement this schedule real-time even if the tag is denied.  I spoke with Brandi at WACM (970) 461-7277 and Theresa at WALC (602) 352-2552.

If there are any issues regarding how the load PSE should be represented on the tag, John Dake at WALC said the CRSPM1 was the appropriate PSE for these tags and there is no reason the schedule should be denied.

You can reach me on my cell at 807-7861 if you have any additional questions.


We are sending this out in draft form until Scott Neal (our "Argentina"
trader) has confirmed the terms of the deal with EDEN.  The trade date will
probably be set towards  the end of next week.  Sara
---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 11/12/99 03:55
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Larry Joe Hunter                           11/12/99 03:34 PM

To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Empresas Draft

Sara,

Enclosed is the Draft document for EDEN.

Let me know how it looks.

Thanks,
Joe


Your HR Generalist will be contacting you in the next few days to strategize
with you regarding the status of contractors in your group that have worked
nine or more months at Enron.     Our goal is to limit possible liability
that may exist within your group.   Please let us know what times would be
best for you to meet with us and we will schedule accordingly.

Hector G. McLoughlin, PHR
Human Resources
Enron Net Works
Office: 713-853-6703
Cell: 713-854-0839


Please print this as well.  I'm driving in now.  Thank you again.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 02/21/2001 08:05 AM
---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Sarah Dennison-Leonard" <sdleonard@earthlink.net>
      02/16/2001 06:30 PM

Please respond to "Sarah Dennison-Leonard" <sdleonard@earthlink.net>
To: "Kristi Wallis" <kristiwallis@sprintmail.com>, "Bud Krogh"
<ekrogh@serv.net>, "Barney Speckman" <bmspeckman@aol.com>, "Judy Welch"
<judyrtowest@earthlink.net>, "Chris Elliott" <chrisrtowest@earthlink.net>
cc:
Subject: TIGR- Follow-up to February 7, 2001 Tariff Integration Group Meeting

Hello, members of the RTO West Stage 2 Tariff Integration  Group.
?
Like so many of you, I seem to be in a perpetual state of  triage these
days.? I apologize it has taken me so long to follow up on our  meeting of
February 7, but at last I have prepared a summary of the various  assignments
and tasks we identified at that meeting.
?
Attached for your reference is a "work tracking document"  with the
information from the February 7 meeting.
?
The work tracking document (along with various other  materials posted since
the February 7 meeting) is on the RTO West Website  at:
?
http://208.55.67.64/Stage2TariffIntGrpMain.htm
?
Thank you very much!
?
Sarah Dennison-LeonardKrogh & Leonard506 SW  6th Avenue, Suite 750Portland,
OR? 97204Phone:? (503)  219-9649Fax:? (503) 224-1895E-mail:?
sdleonard@earthlink.net
 - Feb 16 2001 TIG Working Document.doc


---------------------- Forwarded by John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron on 11/28/2000 11:07 AM ---------------------------

	  From:  Philippe A Bibi @ ECT                           11/28/2000 09:07 AM

To:	John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject:	Market Data Project Update

Attached is the spreadsheet with exchange detail by individual. It's a big spreadsheet you should go to the Tab
'Detailed Sheet with Exchange Fees'


483948

broker has 370.00


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Minns, David
Sent:	Wednesday, October 31, 2001 12:59 AM
To:	Timothy, Justin; McBride, Jane
Cc:	Niesler, Stefan; Aronowitz, Alan; Keogh, Alison
Subject:	RE: Enron Japan - EOL - Yen denominated WTI swap

Jane, happy to  work through this with you. In essence there are 2 steps -

Firstly there is approving the GTCs and the product description. As Justin said this done by the relevant lawyer for the  jurisdiction or more particularly the  Enron counterparty. If the decision is to use US law the counterparty would be ENA. In this case an EWS lawyer in Houston would give the signoff to both the GTCs and the product description. (The two are handled together). Conversely if  Japanese law is chosen then the Enron counterparty that would do an OTC trade for that product in Japan would be the counterparty. That I assume would be EJ. Which choice of law and counterparty to use?  It has been the practice to follow the currency. For example in understand  ENA offers  Japanese and Australian weather in USD. There is also a final legal signoff given by Mark Taylor. This is generally a formality as Mark would be primarily concerned that  relevant lawyer has given their OK.

Secondly, each counterparty needs to be approved to trade the product. This is done by the lawyer responsible for the product (ie the one that approved the GTCs) as well as the lawyer where the company is incorporated/resident. Hence I would assume you would be approving Japanese counterparties irrespective of whether EJ or ENA is the counterparty.

Give me call

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Timothy, Justin
Sent:	Wednesday, 31 October 2001 5:16 PM
To:	McBride, Jane
Cc:	Niesler, Stefan; Minns, David; Aronowitz, Alan; Keogh, Alison
Subject:	RE: Enron Japan - EOL - Yen denominated WTI swap

These are created by legal counsel in the jurisdiction of the Enron entity. So for example if this was for Enron Australia David Minns would be creating the GTC. It appears from your email however that the Enron entity will be ENA hence I would assume that ENA legal counsel would want control over the GTC in this case but obviously you need to clarify.

I work for the EnronOnline Product Control Group which basically administers and co-ordinates the EOL website.

Regards

Justin

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	McBride, Jane
Sent:	Wednesday, 31 October 2001 5:10 PM
To:	Timothy, Justin
Cc:	Niesler, Stefan; Minns, David; Aronowitz, Alan
Subject:	RE: Enron Japan - EOL - Yen denominated WTI swap

Thanks - I think I have these already from you but my questions are more general - I have never been able to get to the bottom of how EOL is managed from a legal perspective hence the email to Alan.

By the way how were these created and who normally creates these; also what is your role in all this?

Thanks.

Jane

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Timothy, Justin
Sent:	31 October 2001 15:01
To:	McBride, Jane; Musch, Susan; Aronowitz, Alan
Cc:	Bekeng, Jan-Erland; Hirl, Joseph; Niesler, Stefan; Minns, David
Subject:	RE: Enron Japan - EOL - Yen denominated WTI swap

Jane,

Attached is a copy of the existing GTC for the existing USD denominated WTI Crude product type for your perusal.

Regards

Justin

 << File: US WTI Fin Swap GTC.doc >>

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	McBride, Jane
Sent:	Wednesday, 31 October 2001 3:12 PM
To:	Musch, Susan; Aronowitz, Alan
Cc:	Bekeng, Jan-Erland; Hirl, Joseph; Niesler, Stefan; Timothy, Justin; Minns, David
Subject:	Enron Japan - EOL - Yen denominated WTI swap

Hi Alan (and Susan),

As you may know, Enron Japan is trying to get some yen denominated products onto EOL in an effort to try and pry the Japanese market open a little bit faster.  Although this is an Enron Japan initiative, the Enron CP would be ENA, so the governing law should probably not be Japanese (but this is unclear - there is a thought that Japanese CPs may prefer Japanese law, but it is also arguable whether they would know or care - in any case Susan, any tax issues in having ENA doing yen denominated trades over EOL under Japanese law?

Anyway the main reason for the email is that I have some very boring questions.  Alan, I am not sure (and to be honest have never really been able to figure out) who makes global EOL legal decisions, whether they come out of London or Houston (because seems to be some overlap) - but since the CP would be ENA, Houston legal will have to be involved, so perhaps Mark Taylor, but would you mind forwarding my questions to the right person.

1.	Procedure wise - who should draft the GTCs for this new product?
2.	If they are done under a US law - who gives legal sign off?
3.	If they are done under Japanese law - can I sign off? Very happy to do so but not having any EOL experience I would need to work closely with someone from EOL legal who could confirm that other than any issues of Japanese law, they are consistent with what we want from the EOL GTCs generally.
4.	Who signs off on "product descriptions" - what is the formal process - I assume it includes the commercial person - in this case Stefan Niesler, does it also require someone from legal, do I do this as the EJ lawyer - should l also get the ENA lawyer to approve since the CP is ENA.

Sorry if these questions seem trivial but I don't know my way on this at all and am concerned that things may fall through the cracks unless we know who will take responsibility for doing what.

Thanks very much.

Kind regards.

Jane McBride
Senior Legal Counsel
Enron Japan Corp.

Tel: +813 5219 4553

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Musch, Susan
Sent:	31 October 2001 01:11
To:	Niesler, Stefan
Cc:	McBride, Jane; Bekeng, Jan-Erland; Hirl, Joseph
Subject:	RE: yen nominated WTI swap

Stefan,

Sorry I missed your call yesterday.  The answer to the question you left on your phone message (i.e., whether there are any tax issues given the current description and facts relating to the WTI product) is no, there shouldn't be any tax issues under the structure described below.

Are you going to revise the description for the product that is currently on EnronOnline Datamanager?  (It currently has the old description where Enron Japan Corp. was going to enter into these transactions.)

Best regards,
Susan

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Niesler, Stefan
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 4:18 AM
To:	Musch, Susan
Subject:	RE: yen nominated WTI swap

Susan,

Apart from the FX, there will be no involvement of EJ at all. It will all be covered under ENA Corp. as the USD WTI Swap is.

Hope that helps.
thx.
StN

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Musch, Susan
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 11:38 AM
To:	Niesler, Stefan
Subject:	RE: yen nominated WTI swap

Stefan,

Would you please clarify to what extent EJC will be participating in these transactions (other than the FX piece)?

Thanks,
Susan

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Niesler, Stefan
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:32 AM
To:	Musch, Susan
Subject:	yen nominated WTI swap

Susan,

I hope I didn't confuse you too much yesterday night.
Here is a quick run down on how we think the Japanese Yen nominated WTI Swap could work:

The mechanics remain the same. The US WTI Swap quotes are converted in Yen/KL and posted on EOL. Incoming transaction are hedged out against the US WTI Swap and the FX exposure is hedge out manually.

The Enron entity entering into the initial transaction and all subsequent hedges is ENA. (same as for the US WTI Swap). The FX hedging will be done by people here in Tokyo who act as agents for ENA. (That's nothing new, they already do that.)

Fair question remaining is what is the rational for the product for ENA and why are we involved in the product development. First of all we are looking for the easiest and most practical solution. ENA is interested because it extends the reach of an exiting product and provides additional deal flow through their books. (No EJ books as touched in this transactions).
The rational for EJ is purely marketing relate. We underline our commitment to the market and proof ourselves as competitive and innovative suppliers of financial products for the Japanese Market. It is supporting our overall market penetration effort.
The issue that it is not Enron Japan entering into the contract is secondary as the Japanese market is looking at Enron as a group. Possible customer concerns about contracting with a foreign company is something we don't see as material. The customer group we are targeting are international active companies that are used to dealings with non-Japanese counterparties. In addition, the credit rating of ENA is far better the EJ's from a Japanese point of view.

I hope this helps to clarify some things. Please feel free to call me if I left anything out or if you need some additional information.

Thank you!

Regards,
StN


UserName: CAMPB54792

You have an electronic trade confirmation in your Inbox.  To retrieve your
trade confirmation you may login to Datek Online and choose Document Delivery
from the Account Services menu, or you may click on the link below:

https://tumble2.datek.com/posta?x=1-5631804-5608569-CRC0A0C0

You have received this message because you subscribed to electronic delivery
for your Datek Online account.  If you wish to stop receiving account
documents via electronic delivery, you may cancel your subscription by
logging into Datek Online and choosing "Settings" from the
Account Services menu.

For more information please call Customer Support at 1-888-U2-DATEK, or send
email to support@datek.com.

Thank you for trading with us.

Datek Online Brokerage Services
Member NASD / SIPC


We have made changes in the holiday pay compensation policy in an attempt to
clarify this issue for those affected.   I am confident that you will be
agreeable with the decision that has been approved by Tim, Jeff , Amy &
myself.

The payment will be made in the form of a lump sum that is payable in
addition to your normal compensation:

Major Holidays worked:    $500
Minor Holidays worked:     $250

The classification of the remaining holidays will be as follows:

Thanksgiving day - major
Day after - minor
CHRISTMAS PARTY - major
Christmas Eve - minor
Christmas Day - major
New Years Eve - major
New years Day - minor

If a shift touches a major holiday,  ie the night shift of Christmas eve
spills into Xmas ,  you will be paid for a major holiday.
The only exception to the above rule is the 6pm to 6am shift on New Year's
Day.   This is not considered a holiday.

We think this is a more straightforward plan that provides more incentive to
those working the  holidays.

This is a policy that is new and subject to  change at any time.    If you
have questions about the policy, please contact myself or Amy Fitzpatrick.

Thanks and have a great holiday season.

JMForney


Richard - here's what I've been able to gather over the past day.

the timing of all this w/ WMI goes back to '95-'99
all this relates to the Davis St. project in Oakland
GSF was the operator of the wellfield and the medium Btu processing plant
GSF owned the plant (a compressor and refrigeration unit) and the pipelines
used to gather the gas
the key person from Ecogas was a guy named Ray Kuroki who was formerly with
GSF when Ecogas acquired them
prior to Ecogas' acquisition of GSF, the project was losing money so GSF was
prepared to walk from the site based on their "economic out" in the
Agreement.  WMI did not want to assume operations so they initiated
negotiations w/ GSF (Ray) to eliminate the royalty payments in return for GSF
continuing to operate the wellfield.  WMI was having its own financial
problems and didn't want the hassle of having to operate a stand alone
facility.
Ray claims WMI lawyers (in Irvine, CA) had drafted an amendment to their
contract but it was never executed.  He believes Ecogas has a copy somewhere
in their files.
While this was occuring, Ecogas acquired GSF and Ray was moved to another
area and Jerrel Branson and Jon Hall (former CFO of Ecogas) took over.
Everyone I've spoken to does confirm that the royalty payments owed were
never made, so this claim could have some legitimacy.  I'm trying to find out
how much?
However, both Ray and Geoff Brown (former GSF who was in charge of ops at
Davis and now currently VP-Ops for Ecogas) assert that GSF never agreed to be
responsible for the landfill's compliance with air quality standards (they
quote Bay Area Rule 34).  Ray and Geoff both stated that GSF was NOT an
environmental company and would never have agreed to such.  Ray seemed to
recall that during the negotiations there was some discussion re: language
whereby GSF would agree to use its "best efforts" to assist WMI in meeting
its compliance standards but nothing that obligated GSF to be responsible for
them.
I have skimmed the Agreement (a copy has been sent to you) and found nothing
that asserts GSF/Ecogas was responsible for any environmental compliance for
anything other than their assets and their operations.  WMI's claim is based
upon fugitive emissions (gas seeping out of the ground) and NOT upon
GSF/Ecogas' failure to operate its plant properly.  Therefore, the
environmental claim seems to be much less grounded.

I'll see you at 3 pm in my office to discuss.

RANDY


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Bronstein, Mara
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 6:55 AM
To:	Tycholiz, Barry; Ward, Kim S (Houston); Miller, Stephanie; Polsky, Phil; Harrison, Tyrell; Whitt, Mark; Lucci, Paul T.; Fuller, Dave
Subject:	Hot List

Please edit this hot list and send it back to me so I can have it ready for our meeting today.
Thanks,
Mara

 << File: 10-8-01 Hot List.xls >>


Fred Lagrasta (Middle Market NYMEX) will begin getting a daily report
begining today with all of his groups daily origination.  As such,  it is
essential that all information is accurate on the origination schedule.
Meaning :

All entries must have:

Book
Deal #
Date originated
Customer
Origination Group
Origination Value
Originator

New information needed in this order:
B/S
Term
Price
Pub code

Thanks for your help


Mike,

Just got it this morning. An area to focus on.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 01/21/2000
07:15 AM ---------------------------

webmaster@cera.com on 01/20/2000 04:04:48 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Briefing Note: Demand Overtakes Hydro in 2000 - CERA Alert

**********************************************************************
CERA Alert:Thu, January 20, 2000
**********************************************************************

Title: Briefing Note: Demand Overtakes Hydro in 2000
Author: Moritzburke, Zenker, Snyder
E-Mail Category: Alert
Product Line: California Energy ,
URL: http://www.cera.com/cfm/track/eprofile.cfm?u=5166&m=1054 ,

Western energy markets are starting the new year with precipitation
conditions that suggest a repeat of 1999's hydroelectric conditions:
near-normal snowpacks in the Pacific Northwest and Canada and low snowpacks
in California. More significantly, even if snowpacks remain high in the
Pacific Northwest, normal demand growth coupled with normal runoff patterns
in the second and third quarters of 2000 would

*  reinforce the likelihood that gas prices will again set the floor for
on-peak power prices

*  keep differentials across western power markets narrow

*  support higher power prices and increase volatility as gas-fired
generation is run more intensively to meet demand in a market with tightening
capacity margins

From 1999 to 2000, natural gas demand will swing upward by nearly 1,200
million cubic feet (MMcf) per day in the third quarter in response to a
return to normal hydroelectric output and demand growth. Gas price increases
will follow from this increased demand. Although differentials between Topock
and the Henry Hub during the third quarter of last year averaged only $0.05
per MMBtu above the Henry Hub price, CERA expects to see differentials this
year averaging around $0.25 per MMBtu above Henry. This stronger western
demand should also narrow differentials between the Henry Hub and the San
Juan Basin, and to a lesser extent, between Henry and the Permian Basin.

Western Snowpack and Hydro Capacity: A Subregional Story
Since the beginning of winter the Pacific Northwest has received normal
precipitation, with greater snowpacks in the northern part of that region
than in the southern part. California currently lags behind historical
precipitation levels at roughly 26 percent of average (see Figure 1). Given
current conditions, it is possible that California will end winter at
below-average hydroelectric conditions.

Western hydroelectric facilities are concentrated in Oregon, Washington, and
British Columbia, which contain over 75 percent (roughly 46,500 megawatts
[MW]) of the Western Systems Coordinating Council's (WSCC's) hydroelectric
capacity, producing 80 percent (roughly 253,500 gigawatt-hours [GWh]) of the
region's total hydroelectric generation in an average year (see Figure 2).
Because of this high concentration of facilities, above-average precipitation
in the Pacific Northwest can help to offset below-average precipitation in
California and other parts of the West, although transfer capabilities limit
the amount of energy exported from those regions.

Power Markets for 2000: Building on 1999 Dynamics
Despite hydroelectric output that was 15 percent higher than average in 1999,
western power prices reflected the cost of gas-fired generation resources
during nearly all periods of the year. This was a greater proportion of the
year than in 1998 even though hydroelectric production in 1998 was only 95
percent of 1999 levels.* CERA expects several factors to strengthen this
dynamic in 2000, assuming normal weather conditions:

*  Western demand growth. Normal weather and economic growth will increase
regional demand by roughly 2 percent in 2000. Growth will be strongest in the
second and third quarters, at 6 percent and 3.5 percent, respectively, adding
9,000 GWh of demand in the second quarter, followed by 6,000 GWh in the third.

*  Return to normal hydroelectric production levels and patterns. Not only
was 1999 hydroelectric production above normal, but 1999 Pacific Northwest
runoff was prolonged by cool weather in the second and third quarters. Normal
runoff dynamics in 2000 would remove roughly 6,500 MW of hydro capacity from
the Pacific Northwest resource stack from the second to the third quarters
(see Figure 3). By contrast, Pacific Northwest hydroelectric capacity was
depleted by an estimated 3,000 MW from the second to the third quarters in
1999 as a result of slower snowpack melt. This provided unseasonably high
hydroelectric availability in the Pacific Northwest through the third and
fourth quarters. The combination of reduced hydroelectric availability in a
normal-weather year in 2000, a shifting of hydroelectric production back to a
second quarter peak, and higher West-wide demand will increase the pull on
nonhydroelectric generation resources (see Figure 4).

*  Energy exports to California. Sustained hydroelectric availability in 1999
in the Pacific Northwest allowed exports from the region to California to
remain strong through the third and fourth quarters, with exports at 150 and
290 percent of normal, respectively. Exports added roughly 1,400 average
megawatts (aMW) above average--and as much as 2,000 aMW in August--to
California's resource base throughout the year. For 2000, CERA expects normal
hydroelectric exports to average roughly 2,000 aMW (total of 17,500 GWh)
during the year and 2,400 aMW (total of 5,300 GWh) in the third quarter (see
Figure 5).

In 2000 the combination of normal load growth, normal spring and summer
weather, and reduced hydroelectric availability will cause capacity margins
to shrink, particularly in California (see Figure 6). The impact on power and
gas prices will be

*  Higher average power prices. Lower average streamflows will diminish the
output of run-of-river hydroelectric facilities during peak summer demand
periods. As runoff dwindles into the summer, production from reservoir-fed
facilities is available for a decreasing period of the on-peak hours. Other
generation resources, particularly gas-fired, will be used to meet demand
during a growing number of shoulder and off-peak hours in 2000. On-peak power
prices will be driven higher by the increased use of gas-fired generation
during shoulder hours. Off-peak power prices will respond to the greater
reliance on gas-fired generation during those hours.

*  Higher average gas prices. Gas demand for power generation is expected to
increase by 600 MMcf per day on average in 2000 and by up to 1,200 MMcf per
day in the third quarter. This will contribute to price strength in western
gas markets and to the higher costs of generating power.

Natural Gas Market
Although the effects of a return to normal hydro conditions become most
evident in the third quarter as overall generation loads increase, CERA
expects that some decline in hydroelectric output relative to last year is
already causing a modest increase in gas demand in California. Although
January West Coast weather has been comparable to last year, flows into
California are up by 300 MMcf per day so far this month; storage withdrawals
are up on a year-over-year basis as well. Based on the lower snowpack and
lower average precipitation in California this month relative to last
January, in-state hydroelectric generation explains approximately 400 MMcf
per day of increased gas demand.

Normal hydroelectric generation this year will likely bring a 250 MMcf per
day increase in western gas demand for power generation during the first
quarter. Early indications of normal-to-above-normal snowpack and
precipitation in the Pacific Northwest should center these increases in
California.

This modest demand increase has helped support prices in the western markets,
with regional weather differences contributing to western strength as well.
Weather in both the United States as whole and the West averaged 10 percent
warmer than normal during December, but during January temperatures in the
West averaged only 8 percent warmer than normal while temperatures in the
United States averaged 30 percent below normal.

Western Regional Prices
Over the next two months as seasonal heating loads within the West begin to
tail off and hydroelectric generation increases modestly, differentials
between western producing basins and the Henry Hub should widen. At the same
time, as required flows into California decline, the Topock premium above
Henry Hub prices should decline, with prices eventually falling below the Hub
price. However, with normal weather in the West, that general weakening in
western prices will likely take place toward the end of February and into
March. Given the warm January, CERA expects heating load to decline by only
400 MMcf per during February. Loads look sufficient to sustain western
differentials near current levels.

California
As more normal winter weather takes hold in the East, prices should increase
in that market relative to California. So far this month, strong flows into
the state have held Topock differentials around $0.10 per MMBtu relative to
the Henry Hub. During February flows into the state are expected to decline
somewhat as heating demand begins to decline. Table 1 shows expected flows
into California for winter 1999/2000 compared with winter 1998/1999. That
weakening in the Topock differential is limited, however. Expected lower
storage inventories in California relative to last year, as well as a low
upside to eastern prices, should keep Topock prices from falling more than
$0.05 per MMBtu below the Henry Hub during February. Topock prices are
expected to maintain a $0.03 per MMBtu premium to the Henry Hub price (see
Table 2).

Pacific Northwest
Although some cold weather in the Pacific Northwest has held Malin prices
close to Topock prices during January, CERA expects the Malin price to weaken
relative to Topock during February--and more dramatically in March. Two
factors are expected to contribute to this weakening:

*  Hydroelectric output. Although February will bring a decline in heating
load in both the Pacific Northwest and California regions, gas will receive
some support from decreased hydroelectric generation relative to last year in
California. In the Pacific Northwest gas demand is limited during spring even
in normal hydroelectric generation conditions.

*  Canadian flows. Flows to the West Coast on Pacific Gas Transmission during
the first quarter of 1999 dropped from an average of 2.6 Bcf per day during
1998 to 2.4 Bcf per day as Canadian supplies headed into the Midwest on the
Northern Border expansion. This year, given the year-over-year increase in
Canadian supply, those flows into the Pacific Northwest should rebound to
1998 levels.

The Topock-Malin differential so far this month has averaged only $0.06 per
MMBtu. During the first quarter of 1999, that differential averaged $0.09 per
MMBtu. Because of the forces described above, CERA expects a wider
differential--$0.13 per MMBtu--this February.

Rocky Mountains
Similar forces will drive a widening in Rocky Mountain prices relative to
prices in the south. Regional Rockies supplies are likely to increase as
regional demand declines--although warm January weather will limit declines
to 100 MMcf per day during February. The decline in heating load in the
Pacific Northwest, with continued strong Canadian imports, will allow
increased exports from the Pacific Northwest into the Rocky Mountain region
on Northwest pipeline--similar to 1998 conditions. Within the Rockies, supply
builds continue in the Powder River Basin; the new Fort Union and Thunder
Creek gathering systems are now delivering a total of approximately 100 MMcf
per day into the Rocky Mountain interstate pipeline system. Rockies
differentials to the Henry Hub should average $0.25 per MMBtu during February.

Southwest
As demand declines and supply builds in the Rocky Mountains, CERA expects the
spread between Rocky Mountain and San Juan Basin prices to increase slightly,
but for February, Rockies heating load will likely keep the prices close.
Although the differential between the two basins has averaged $0.03 this
month and held at less than $0.05 during December, a $0.05 per MMBtu spread
appears likely for February. This slight increase marks only the beginning of
a wider divergence. CERA expects the differential between the two basins to
widen to over $0.15 per MMBtu this summer as San Juan prices gain support
from strong demand in California power markets.

**end**

Follow URL for PDF version of this Alert with associated tables and graphics.
Please note: should a link not occur using the above URL, please use the
following:
http://www.cera.com/client/ce/alt/012000_16/ce_alt_012000_16_ab.html

**********************************************************************
This electronic message and attachments, if any, contain information
from Cambridge Energy Research Associates, Inc. (CERA) which is
confidential and may be privileged. Unauthorized disclosure, copying,
distribution or use of the contents of this message or any attachments,
in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited.

Terms of Use: http://eprofile.cera.com/tos.html
Questions/Comments: webmaster@cera.com
Copyright 2000. Cambridge Energy Research Associates


Hey Buddy!!!!  Wrong worksheet.

	From:  Jim Homco                           04/02/2001 11:58 AM

To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: March Doyle


Please see the attached memo from the CLE Committee regarding CLE credits for
the 2000 Enron Law Conference.


OPEN ENROLLMENT REMINDER

Today, November 12 is the last day to make elections for the first round of Open Enrollment 2002.

Confirmation statements will be mailed the week of November 19.

November 26 - 30 the system will reopen for changes.

Final Confirmation Statements will be mailed the week of December 21.

You can enroll by going to www.benefits.enron.com from work or from home www.synhrgy.com or you can call 800.332.7979.


---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Neal/HOU/ECT on 04/11/2001 04:36 PM
---------------------------

"Julie Haviland" <julie.haviland@ubspainewebber.com> on 04/11/2001 03:34:46 PM
To: "'scott.neal@enron.com'" <scott.neal@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: FW: 1099 help

Scott,

This should do it.

Let me know if you need any help with anything!

Julie

-----Original Message-----
From: Toby Pullig [SMTP:toby.pullig@ubspainewebber.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 3:09 PM
To: 'julie.haviland@ubspainewebber.com'
Subject: 1099 help

Notice Regarding Entry of Orders and Instructions: Please
do not transmit orders and/or instructions regarding your
PaineWebber account(s) by e-mail. Orders and/or instructions
transmitted by e-mail will not be accepted by PaineWebber and
PaineWebber will not be responsible for carrying out such orders
and/or instructions.  Notice Regarding Privacy and Confidentiality:
PaineWebber reserves the right to monitor and review the content of
all e-mail communications sent and/or received by its employees.
 - How to File Your Taxes 2000 X068.pdf


Make sure this is on my schedule.
---------------------- Forwarded by John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron on 08/04/2000
12:59 PM ---------------------------

Jeffrey T Hodge@ECT
07/27/2000 10:46 AM
Sent by: Jenny Helton@ECT
To: Alonzo Williams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrea Ring/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrew H
Lewis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrew R Conner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ashton
Soniat/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bhavna Pandya/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill
Berkeland/Corp/Enron@Enron, Bill Rust/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Crane/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Brad McKay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian O'Rourke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bruce
Hebert/GCO/Enron@ENRON, Caroline Abramo/Corp/Enron@Enron, Chad
Starnes/Corp/Enron@Enron, Charles H Otto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Charlie
Jewell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Gaskill/Corp/Enron@Enron, Chris
Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Lenartowicz/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Clint
Dean/Corp/Enron@Enron, Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Corry
Bentley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Craig Breslau/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cyril Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan
Junek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daniel Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daniel Reck/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Darren Delage/HOU/ECT@ECT, David J Vitrella/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Ryan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David Zaccour/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dean Laurent/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Diana Allen/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Dick Jenkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Don
Baughman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Douglas Miller/ECF/Enron@ENRON, Douglas
SMITH/ENRON@Gateway, Ed Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward D Baughman/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Elsa Piekielniak/Corp/Enron@Enron, Eric Saibi/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Erik
Serio/Corp/Enron@Enron, Fletcher J Sturm/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank
Ermis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fred Lagrasta/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary Hickerson/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Geoff Storey/HOU/ECT@ECT, George Hopley/HOU/ECT@ect, George
McClellan/HOU/ECT@ECT, George N Gilbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, George
Wood/Corp/Enron@Enron, Gerald Gilbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg
Trefz/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg Woulfe/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Gretchen Lotz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, James E
Terrell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jane M Tholt/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janel
Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Janelle Scheuer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jared
Kaiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jason Choate/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jason
Crawford/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jay Reitmeyer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jay
Wills/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeff King/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Kinneman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer
Fraser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer Shipos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim Homco/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe
Errigo/Corp/Enron@Enron, Joe Parks/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joe
Stepenovitch/Corp/Enron@Enron, John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Berger/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Craig Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, John D Suarez/HOU/ECT@ECT,
John Grass/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John Greene/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Kinser/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Llodra/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John M
Singer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John Zufferli/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Zurita/HOU/EES@EES,
Juan Hernandez/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Judy Townsend/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kate
Fraser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kayne Coulter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Keith
Comeaux/Corp/Enron@Enron, Keith Holst/HOU/ECT@ect, Keller
Mayeaux/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kelli Stevens/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin
Cline/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin
McGowan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kyle Schultz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Larry
Jester/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Larry May/Corp/Enron@Enron, Larry
Valderrama/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laura Podurgiel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lawrence
Clayton/Corp/Enron@Enron, Lisa Burnett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Lisa
Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lloyd Will/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lucy Ortiz/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron, David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J
Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Antitrust Training Update

Attached is a memo detailing Antitrust Training.


Harry:
Wanted to get your comments on your conversation with Michael.  I think it would be good if we put something together using the information I have combined with what you would like to show them.  Then think about going up there pretty soon.  Let me know what you think.
Ben


Thanks for the report.  The level of detail was on target.  Let me know when you want to discuss comp issues.

Adam_Umanoff%ENRON@eott.com on 04/29/2001 12:23:55 PM
To:	Stanley_Horton%Enron.com%Eott@EOTT.COM
cc:

Subject:	EWC - Weekly Update/Week Ending 27 April

1.  Aura.
     -  Received revised bid from UBS which Metts describes as "real."  UBS
will now commence detailed 6-8 week due diligence on EWC (at Enron's
expense if deal busts).  Confidence re: UBS' ability to execute remains
mixed.
     -  LJM (Fastow) interest continues, but unclear how parallel process
can be run.  Umanoff concerned about conflict when management assists
seller as part of UBS deal but assists buyer as part of LJM deal.
     -  Now that '01 numbers scrubbed, in process of revising '02 financial
projections based on detailed internal review (as of December, 2000, '02
EBITDA projected at approximately $115mm; up from 1CE '01 projection of
$78mm). This is unrealistic; I expect 2002 EBITDA in the $90-95mm range,
showing solid 15-20% EBITDA growth.

2.  M&A Activity.
     -  acquisition of assets of bankrupt Dutch blade manufacturer, Aerpac,
continues; we have closed on several assets and expect final closing in
May.
     -  sale of Greek operating projects to German buyer continues, but
execution uncertain.  Closing targeted for June 30.  Sale of Greek
development company also launched, with 2 parties expressing interest.

3.  2001 Commercial Activity.
     -  US backlog remains firm.  Projected demand continues to exceed our
projected turbine supply.  Key execution issue is confimation of
suitability of 1.5 MW turbine (primarily its gearbox) in more rigorous US
wind regimes.
     -  American Electric Power has provided indicative bid to purchase the
two Texas projects we have under development (Indian Mesa I and Clear Sky);
indicative bid price is attractive.  AEP has requested Enron Corp guaranty
of EWC's turbine warranty, like they have received on previous sales with
EWC.  Enron Corp guaranty is approved internally, but, in light of Aura,
we will continue to bargain for no Enron Corp credit support. Finally, debt
financing expected to close on IMI in May and debt circled on Clear Sky in
June.  Turbine suitability due diligence is key pacing item for debt
closing.
     -  European backlog remains firm, expect for Spanish sales of 750kw
turbine, which remains soft. EWC attended Hannover Fair last week, the
largest industrial trade show in Europe.  Our exhibit was very well
received.  CEO of German competitor, Enercon, approached Umanoff to discuss
IP issues (Enercon is currently barred from US market on patent
infringement grounds).

4.  HR Issues.
     -  US has lost O&M director and 2 key commercial employees have
expressed concerns.  Need to finalize retention program (Umanoff to discuss
with Horton early in week).
     -  Key recruiting initiatives are: GM Spain; head of global
procurement/blade MFG; European GC.  Umanoff would also like to re-visit
hiring US GM/MD, as day-to-day US operations require more detailed
oversight than Umanoff is currently providing; not clear if we can recruit
for this position in the midst of Aura.

Stan - for the future, please let me know whether this is the right level
of focus.  Talk with you soon. Adam


I just spoke with Bob, and he said he wasn't told about these trades, but to
go ahead and enter them into the system. Can you tell me what the MW total
per hour should be?

Thanks

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
01/05/2001 01:53 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: 1/5/00 Checkout

AMEREX

I am missing the following deals for Bob Badeer:

Enron buys from EES April'01  NP-15 off-peak  at $94.95
Enron sell to Duke APril'01 NP-15 off-peak at $95.00


Are you taking any resumes?  I need to start the process.  I don't know what the future
holds here?  I don't think anyone does.  We don't know if there will be more mgmt
surprises?


Ken has talked about EES willingness to invest this money in demand side
management, if the right program were set up -- eg a demand buydown program.

	Leslie Lawner
	02/13/2001 06:53 PM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Ken Lay promise

Apparently there are rumors that Ken Lay promised to make some kind of
investment in California when he was talking to folks in the state ($300
million in DSM?)  Do any of you know what this commitment might be?  Sandy
needs to be filled in on this.  Let me know as soon as you can.


I'd like to hold off sending this to EECC until we have the PPA issues
completely addressed.

Scott

To: Ron Tapscott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott A Monson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Steve Van Hooser/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Mooring Construction

Attached is a revised construction agreement (redlined version) incorporating
the changes we discussed.  I have not changed either the liquidated damages
or force majeure provisions at this point.  Ron, you indicated in your voice
mail that you wanted to wait until things firmed up a bit more with respect
to those provisions.  Please review and let me know if you have any questions.

Not sure if we should forward to EE&CC at this point yet, given the
uncertainty on the two provisions.  What are your thoughts?  Thanks


-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Ricks [mailto:robricks86@hotmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 3:07 PM
To: Reitmeyer, Jay
Subject: Resume for Robert J. Ricks, Jr.

Jay,

Attached is my resume and a brief memo for you.

Thank you,
Robert


Attached, in WordPerfect format, are the following documents with respect to
the Tahiti transaction:

- Sale and Auction Agreement (255084);
- Trust Agreement of Tahiti Series Trust (254424);
- LLC Agreement of Fiji Z LLC (254423);
- Trust Agreement of Bali Trust (255146); and
- Subscription Documents (255729).

The documents have been revised to reflect many of the comments received to
date; however, we realize that there are still a few open issues to be
resolved.

Chris Krecek, Secretary/Legal Assistant
Andrews & Kurth L.L.P.
1717 Main Street, Suite 3700
Dallas, Texas 75201
Phone: (214) 659-4481
Fax: (214) 659-4401
Email: ckrecek@andrews-kurth.com

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:  The information in this e-mail (including any
attachments) is confidential, legally privileged and intended only for the
use of each recipient named above.  If you are not an intended recipient, you
must not read, use or disseminate this information.  If you have received
this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail
and delete this e-mail from your computer.
VIRUS WARNING:  Although this e-mail (including any attachments) is not
intended to contain any virus or defect that may affect your computer, you
are responsible for ensuring that no virus or defect exists.  The sender
disclaims any responsibility for any loss or damages arising from any virus
or defect associated with this e-mail.

 - 255729.wpd
 - 254424.wpd
 - 255084.wpd
 - 255146.wpd
 - 254423.wpd


You need to speak with the developer.  There is no way to control the
inclusion of "Other Agreements" in the "All Agreements" section as the system
is currently designed.

I am not disagreeing with you; I learned this the hard way a few months ago.
The system is confusing.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	Tana Jones
	03/14/2001 05:47 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: JP Morgan Securities Inc. (Electronic Order)

It has been my understanding that the first section is supposed to be for
master swap agreements only.  Having other documents listed in that section
may be misleading to some parties who may misconstrue their use for general
trading purposes, such as Global Contracts.  That is why we created the
"Other Agreements" section, to house these other agreements.  My
understanding isthat the only reason other agreements has been listed in the
Master Swap Agreements Section is that they have been done so erroneously.
The drop down were not created too artfully created, allowing wrong
agreements to be put in Master Swap Agreements, which has been
proliferating.  If my understanding is not correct, than when did the
intentional use of that first section change?  I think putting all agreement
is a very bad idea.

	Sara Shackleton
	03/14/01 05:35 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: JP Morgan Securities Inc. (Electronic Order)

Tana:  I think the agreement is listed in Section 1 (all agreements) which is
not just Master Swap Agreements.  It is also listed in the approprate Section
13 entry.
Hope you're enjoying Canada!

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	Tana Jones
	03/14/2001 04:26 PM

		 To: Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron, Cheryl Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: (bcc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT)
		 Subject: JP Morgan Securities Inc. (Electronic Order)

The above counterparty has been created in the Financial Trading Agreements
Database and is listed as a master swap agreement, and it's not.  It is an
Electronic Trading Agreement and needs to be moved down to "Other
Agreements".  Please let me know when that is done and I will delete the
entry in  the master swap agreement database.  Thanks!


---------------------- Forwarded by Maria Sandoval/HOU/ECT on 11/20/2000
07:41 AM ---------------------------

Yolanda Sandoval <Yolanda.Sandoval@Halliburton.com> on 11/17/2000 08:37:44 AM
To: "J R. Taylor" <JR.Taylor@Halliburton.com>
cc:
Subject: FW: Thanksgiving

Yolanda Sandoval
KBR Legal Dept.
*713-753-5986
 *713-753-7626
* yolanda.sandoval@halliburton.com

This email, including any attached files, may contain confidential and
privileged information for the sole use of the intended recipient(s).  Any
review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited.
If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive information
for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply email and delete all
copies of this message.  Thank you.

>  <<turkeyrevenge.exe>>
>

 - turkeyrevenge.exe


Alan,

Attached is a redline version of the agreement previously discussed.  Let me
have your thoughts regarding these changes.

Best regards,
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Attached is the presentation that Jeff reviewed last week in the meeting.
---------------------- Forwarded by Brenda F Herod/HOU/ECT on 06/27/2000
08:39 PM ---------------------------

Jeff Johnson@ENRON
06/19/2000 05:34 PM
To: Beth Perlman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryce Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent A
Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laura E Scott/CAL/ECT@ECT,
Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jefferson D Sorenson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert
Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda F Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kenneth M
Harmon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dave Nommensen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Regan M Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT,
laray.odum@luminant.com, nadeem.abbasi@luminant.com, Scott
Williamson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul F Poellinger/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Simmons/NA/Enron@Enron, Chris Hanz/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Rebecca Ford/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Angelina V Lorio/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Paskin/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Wed Unify Mtg 2:00 - 2 Allen Center, 12th floor conf room

Please note that the Wed meeting will be held as planned from 2:00-4:00PM in
the 2 Allen Center in the 12th floor Forum conference room.
The room entrance is just off the elevator bank foyer.

Here is the draft of the presentation that we will discuss on Wednesday. We
are interested in your input and feedback in the meeting on Wednesday.

Thanks.

---------------------- Forwarded by Jeff Johnson/Corp/Enron on 06/19/2000
05:20 PM ---------------------------

Alarm enabled: an alarm will occur  on 06/21/2000 01:55 PM
	Calendar Entry

Brief description:
Date:
Time:

Unify System -- Problems and Proposed Immediate Projects. Two Allen Center,
12th floor forum
06/21/2000
02:00 PM - 04:00 PM

Detailed description:

The meeting will be held in Two Allen Center on the 12th floor in the large
conference room (called the Forum). The room entrance is just off the
elevator bank in the foyer.

We believe that we have an approach to immediately begin to address key
performance issues in the Unify system.
To be successful with the proposed projects, we need your input, sponsorship
and participation. Angie Lorio will find a location and will publish as soon
as possible.

The proposed agenda is as follows:

I. UNIFY --  Current State, Strengths, Issues
II. Conceptual Overview Of Proposed Solutions
Organization Building
Performance Monitoring Team
Sybase 12 Upgrade
SQL Server Testing
Middle Tier Rearchitecture Project
Scoping For A Re-Write Effort
III. Solutions Proposals / Plans For Immediate Review / Kickoff
Proposed Scope
Assumptions
High Timelines / Cost Estimates
Staffing
IV. Facilitated Discussion On Unify
Future Growth / Changes Required For Unify
New Project Prioritization

Invitations have been sent to: Beth Perlman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryce
Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Laura E Scott/CAL/ECT@ECT, Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jefferson D
Sorenson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda F Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Kenneth M Harmon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dave Nommensen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Regan M
Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, laray.odum@luminant.com, nadeem.abbasi@luminant.com, Scott
Williamson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul F Poellinger/HOU/ECT@ECT
Optional invitees: Chris Hanz/Corp/Enron@Enron, John Simmons/NA/Enron@Enron,
Angie Lorio
_________________________________________________________________________
This meeting repeats   starting on    (if the date occurs on a weekend the
meeting ).


I don't have copies of anything.

Marie Heard
Senior Legal Specialist
Enron Broadband Services
Phone:  (713) 853-3907
Fax:  (713) 646-8537
Marie_Heard@Enron.net

	Tanya Rohauer@ECT
	11/20/00 10:26 AM

		 To: Marie Heard/Enron Communications@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS@ENRON
		 cc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Micron

Can't you just make changes to the one we did for ENA?

Marie Heard@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
11/20/2000 10:06 AM
To: Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Michael Moulton/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
Subject: Micron

Tanya,

Will you send me a worksheet?

Thanks!

Marie Heard
Senior Legal Specialist
Enron Broadband Services
Phone:  (713) 853-3907
Fax:  (713) 646-8537
Marie_Heard@Enron.net
----- Forwarded by Marie Heard/Enron Communications on 11/20/00 10:09 AM -----

	Michael Moulton
	11/20/00 09:56 AM

		 To: Marie Heard/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc:
		 Subject: Micron

Marie,

Can you put together an ISDA for Micron Technologies.  I hope you had a great
weekend.
Please let me know if you need any additional information.

Thanks, ,

Mike


The report named:
<http://trv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=33&report_name=EM
W+Positions&category_cd=9&category_name=EMW&toc_hide=1&sTV1=9&TV1Exp=Y&c
urrent_efct_date=10/29/2001> EMW Positions, published as of 10/29/2001
is now available for viewing on the website.


What is your hotmail nickname?


ST-CALI is short 50 mws in NP-15 on Monday on peak.  Please buy for ST-CALI
(under their book) and sell to the California Imbalance for them.  They are
short at $340.
Thanks,
Bill


I thought class was on Saturday and as for the child - use duct tape.  It has
great sticking power!!

Lia Halstead@ENRON
03/14/2001 01:33 PM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: NYPA

Chris,

I could probably do a quick dinner downtown.  With a small child and graduate
school I have trouble squeezing normal duties into a day, but would like to
try to squeeze in a dinner...if nothing less maybe just an appetizer.

Lia


It's OK this time.  The Determination Period in this confirm is confusing;
exchange-based price sources should be tied to the delivery
month/Determination Period.

Bernice Rodriguez
06/22/99 10:12 AM
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Cargill Inc. - EW5791.1

Sara,

Sharon at Cargill called in regards to deal EW5791.1.  She wants to see if we
can delete the Effective Date and Termination Date on the confirmation.

(Since the term is defined in the Determination Period, she thought it would
be less confusing.)

Let me know what you think....

Bernice

Fax to follow.......


Approved

Christine Stokes
07/25/2000 02:45 PM
To: Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew
Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Glen
Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Darveaux/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bill
Cordes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Transwestern Contract Approval Request

TRANSWESTERN PIPELINE CONTRACT APPROVAL REQUEST

Please review the attached standard discount letter for Sempra Energy Trading
Corp.  Sempra was recently awarded 49,000 Dth/d of East of Thoreau (EOT) to
California capacity via Transwestern's Interactive Open Season Auction
process.  The capacity was awarded at a one-part rate of $.285/Dth/d for a
one year term of November 1, 2000 - October 31, 2001.  Sempra shall have
alternate delivery point rights at the California Border as well as alternate
receipt point rights in Transwestern's EOT Area.

Please confirm via REPLY WITH HISTORY.  All Officer approvals will be faxed
to Bill Cordes for final Officer approval.


I'll be down on the floor to sit with you  during lunch thru AGA.

John D. Suarez
Enron Broadband Services
(713) 853-5267 work
(713) 443-5267 mobile
(877) 597-0646 pager
email: john.suarez@enron.com


Dan,

Please see attached Credit Worksheet for Huish.  As discussed this Agreement
must be signed in conjunction with Mike Morris's proposed transaction.

Thank you,

Russell


I'm a really sweet guy, especially now.


You should enjoy this article.
PL

---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 01/30/2001
01:03 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Victor Guggenheim                           01/30/2001 12:55 PM

To: Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/football/college/news/2001/01/30/tuberville_m
iami_ap/


request_number:  DS-WA:016
firstname:  Terry Mundorf
lastname:  Mundorf
e-mail:  terrym@millcreeklaw.com
exhibit_wp-02-e-:  JGC-01, 02
page_numbers:
request_text:
request_text:  Please disclose and/or produce any and all communications from
October 16, 2000 to the present, between the BPA representatives listed below
and any representative of any other party concerning BPA's rates to be in
effect for Fiscal Years 2002-2006, the interactions of such rates and
customer contracts, or procedural aspects of these rate proceedings.

 Bob Proctor
 Tim McCoy
 Byrne Lovell
 Byron Keep
 Valerie Lefler
 Jon Wright
 Peter Berger

For purposes of this Request, "disclose and/or produce" has the meanings
described below.  With respect to oral communications, "disclose and/or
produce" means to describe the time, date, approximate duration, and
substantive content of the communication; the identity and organizational
affiliation of the communicating individuals; whether the communication
occurred in person or by telephone; the location of the communication if in
person; the identity of any witnesses to the communications, including all
individuals in the room if the communication occurred by speakerphone; and
whether the communication was made in the presence of or after coordination
with BPA counsel (if so, identify such counsel).  For purposes of this
Request, you need not "disclose and/or produce" oral communications that
occurred during meetings noticed in compliance with Rate Case Rule 1010.7(d).

With respect to written communications, the Request includes communications
in any recorded form, whether on paper, electronic (including, without
limitation, e-mails), or whatever form.  For such communications, "disclose
and/or produce" means to provide copies of all non-identical versions of any
written communications and to describe with particularity the location where
such communications were found and/or stored, including the identity of the
individual with possession or control of the written communications; to
describe with particularity the circumstances under which they were generated
or referred to; and to fully "disclose and/or produce" any oral
communications made in connection with the written communications consistent
with the preceding paragraph.  For purposes of this Request, you need not
produce papers served on all parties to the rate case and made part of the
official file in the rate case.

response_text:
  WPAG objects to this Data Request on the grounds that it (1) seeks
information that is not relevant and (2) seeks information that is unduly
burdensome to produce.  (Rules of Procedure Governing Rate Hearings, Section
1010.8(b).)  WPAG further objects to this Data Request on the grounds that it
is in improper form, as it does not cite to specific testimony or indicate
the specific use to which to information sought will be put,  (Special Rules
of Practice, WP-02-O-01.)and was received after the deadline for submission
of data requests.  Without waiving the foregoing objections, we respond as
follows:

See response and exhibits to DS-WA:015.

The following information is from the web server:
1.  Logon: IUSR_GRANITE
2.  Remote Host:  router.millcreeklaw.com
3.  Remote IP Address:  204.57.181.3
4.  Form URL:
https://secure.bpa.gov/power/secure/psp/ratecase/discovery/wp_02_response.html
5.  Browser Client:  Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.01; Windows 95)


I have a commodity trading account, however I do not trade energy contracts.

thanks,
robert


Bob/Kay:

Thanks for your help last week with these ComEd LOI's.

Janet signed the documents Friday afternoon and we faxed a copy of each to
ComEd.  ComEd will use the electronic versions below to generate executable
copies on their letterhead and send them back to me.  I will bring them up
for initialling once I recieve them.

Fred

Bob Carter
07/21/2000 05:35 PM
To: Carter.C.Culver@ucm.com
cc: Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Com Ed LOIs

Fred Mitro asked that I send the electronic versions of these two documents.


---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 02/13/2001 11:27 AM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Shanna Husser @ EES                           02/12/2001 07:26 AM

To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Fwd: Fw: UT Fans - So True!

Look what this mean person made up about your school!
---------------------- Forwarded by Shanna Husser/HOU/EES on 02/12/2001 07:26
AM ---------------------------

Christina Barthel@ENRON
02/12/2001 07:23 AM
To: Rafael Avila/NA/Enron, "Becky Bliss" <blbliss@hewitt.com>, Leon
Branom/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Kim Chick/HOU/EES, Robert B
Cothran/Corp/Enron@ENRON, "Anne Denley" <ADenley@vailresorts.com>, "jason
eggenburger" <jasonegg@hotmail.com>, Emily Ferguson/ENRON@enronXgate,
"Meredith" <meredith@friersoncpa.com>, Ryan Hinze/Corp/Enron, Shanna
Husser/HOU/EES@EES@ENRON, "Toby Gouw" <tgouw@teamworks.ws>, Ben
Huxen/NA/Enron, "Juranek, Andrew A" <JuranAA@texaco.com>, Lynna
Kacal/Corp/Enron@ENRON, "Erin Landers" <elaggie99@hotmail.com>, "Jared
McDaniel" <jaredmcdaniel@hotmail.com>, "Anthony Moawad" <amoawad@kpmg.com>,
Chris Ochoa/NA/Enron, "Jaimie"<Jaimie_Parker@hotmail.com>, "Tracie Reed"
<traciereed99@hotmail.com>, "Brandon" <brandon.shimer@imgfinancialgroup.com>,
"Jose" <jose.a.suarez@us.pwcglobal.com>, Raul Yzquierdo/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications
cc:
Subject: Fwd: Fw: UT Fans - So True!

From: "Kelly Kohrman" <pyrowoman@hotmail.com>
To: albert_ferrel@yahoo.com, ashbaylor@hotmail.com,
Ashley.Victorick@coastalcorp.com, aggie_guy21@yahoo.com,
CharlesPotterMail@yahoo.com, christina_ag99@hotmail.com, jadajot@yahoo.com,
jaf4678@neo.tamu.edu, j_a_garner@yahoo.com, laftamu@excite.com,
long@astrosfan.net, SLogan@TXLMortgage.com, AggieTia98@worldnet.att.net
Subject: Fwd: Fw: UT Fans - So True!
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2001 22:55:29

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

 - ut1.gif


Rod:  FYI, Paul's doing bond swap with UBS.  Does credit have any issues?  I
am verifying the Enron party (since I am not familiar with the ECT Investment
Trust).  Please advise.  Sara
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 07/31/2000 05:13 PM -----

	Laurel Adams
	07/31/2000 05:03 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: TR Bond Swap Confirmation

Sara,

Paul wants to know if we have any objections to the attached form of
confirmation.  Please let me know if you have any concerns.  Thank you!
---------------------- Forwarded by Laurel Adams/HOU/ECT on 07/31/2000 05:00
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Paul Pizzolato                           07/31/2000 09:32 AM

To: Tom Doukas/NA/Enron@ENRON, Laurel Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff
Kinneman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: TR Bond Swap Confirmation

---------------------- Forwarded by Paul Pizzolato/HOU/ECT on 07/31/2000
09:22 AM ---------------------------

Greg.Mackay@ubsw.com on 07/27/2000 01:48:39 PM
To: paul.pizzolato@enron.com
cc:
Subject: TR Bond Swap Confirmation

     Paul,
     Please find attached a blank template Bond Total Return Swap Master
     Confirm and the adjoining Supplemental Confirm.  It has been updated
     to take three hours for you to accept or reject the Market Value set
     by the Calculation Agent.
     Please call with any questions or concerns.  Hope to get a trade on
     ASAP.

     Thanks and Regards,

     Greg MacKay

 - ect_supp.doc
 - ect_ma~1.doc

This message contains confidential information and is intended only
for the individual named.  If you are not the named addressee you
should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.  Please
notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this
e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system.

E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free
as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed,
arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.  The sender therefore
does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents
of this message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission.  If
verification is required please request a hard-copy version.  This
message is provided for informational purposes and should not be
construed as a solicitation or offer to buy or sell any securities or
related financial instruments.


Dear all,

If you recall, several months ago we held a meeting to discuss the bonus
planning needs for Commercial and Commercial Support Analysts now that they
have been combined into one program under the A/A Program umbrella.

I was asked to put together some information on how bonuses in 1999 compared
between Merchant Service Analysts, Commercial Analysts and Commercial Support
Sr. Specialists (and possibly even Managers) so that we could determine if
there would be a 2000 bonus compression problem in Analysts being placed in
Commercial Support positions and then having lower bonuses.  Attached below
you will find the results of that research.

In short the conclusions are these:
The 2000 system allows a difference between Commercial and Commercial Support
Analyst bonus matrices preventing the compression problem.
In 1999, Commercial Analyst and Commercial Support Sr. Specialist bonus
matrices were comparable - and this can still occur in 2000.
Bonus structures can easily be planned for 2000 so that no compression
problem occurs.

The data above is being sent to help you understand the concepts we discussed
and put closure to the meeting.  The 2000 bonus planning system allows for a
variation within Analyst categories (commercial and commercial support) and
will meet the business needs.  Please let me know if you want to discuss
further or would like to see the raw data used in the research.

Regards,
Kim


John wanted me to send it to you.  We are going to ask Jinsung what the
differences are once he gets out of this meeting.  Thanks
Ben


Morela,  Attached is the letter with some revisions.   Let me know if you
have any questions.


Attached is the latest listing of executed equity agreements.  We have a
separate listing for futures agreements but the brokers are different from
equity brokers.


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Meredith Philipp/Corp/Enron on 08/17/2000
09:30 AM ---------------------------

Rosalee Fleming on 08/14/2000 10:47:18 AM
To: Meredith Philipp/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: THE ARENA DEAL IS A RIPOFF TO TAXPAYERS

---------------------- Forwarded by Rosalee Fleming/Corp/Enron on 08/14/2000
10:46 AM ---------------------------

DJS400@cs.com on 08/14/2000 09:35:46 AM
To: VIEWPOINTS@chron.com
cc: PAUL_BETTENCOURT@co.harris.tx.us, JUDGE_ECKELS@co.harris.tx.us,
HCRPGOP@AOL.COM, KENNETH.LAY@enron.com, STEVE_LETBETTER@reliantenergy.com
Subject: THE ARENA DEAL IS A RIPOFF TO TAXPAYERS

 - ARENA.doc


If J. Franco wins, you win $2425
If he loses, you lose $75


Hi John,

Neil and I discussed this last night.  I know we are interested in at least
as many games as we had last year.  I'll check with him and get back to you.

Hope all is well.  I haven't forgotten you!

Kay


Are we in good order with Southern Union Company? Or  do you still want me to
draft a GISB?

Please advise.

Thanks!

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Kay,

I don't know the answer to your 1st question since I don't recall ever
having to have insurance certificates on any of the other Facility
Agreements.  Maybe we did, but I just forgot that detail.  Jaap/Kent? do you
know?

The Retention LC was faxed this am to Greg Lang and Isabell Parker.  Jaap's
Admin Asst can fax you a copy (Carla Corly) if you wish.

Also, need to talk about Austin Tech reps being added to Facility Agreement
asap (Mike Storm says they've worked out 1700 hours with Eric Booth).  But
we need something in the interim that confirms this will be added into the
Austin Facility Agreement (e-mail to me OK).

Regards,

Lee

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2001 8:43 AM
To: Shoemaker, Kent (GEAE); Johnson, Lee L (PS, GE AEP); Smink, Jaap
(PS, GE AEP)
Subject: Signatures for Certain Documents

Good morning.

I haven't seen the insurance certificate she references.  Anyone know where
it is?

Is the retention letter of credit available yet? I know it has been
requested, but I don't recall seeing that it has been delivered.

Thanks for everything,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 05/02/2001 08:37
AM ---------------------------

"Chow, Susan D." <susanchow@paulhastings.com> on 05/01/2001 07:45:03 PM

To:   "'ccampbell@kslaw.com'" <ccampbell@kslaw.com>, "'kay.mann@enron.com'"
<kay.mann@enron.com>
cc:   "Lang, Gregory F." <gregorylang@paulhastings.com>

Subject:  Signatures for Certain Documents

"paulhastings.com" made the following annotations on 05/01/01 20:45:12
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

NEW E-MAIL ADDRESSES AT PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP

We have changed our e-mail address.  Our new domain name is
paulhastings.com.  In most cases, our address is composed of
conventional first name and last name plus @paulhastings.com.  Here are
two examples: janesmith@paulhastings.com and danjones@paulhastings.com.
If you have any questions, please contact us at noc@paulhastings.com.

============================================================================
==

"The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity
to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you
received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the
material from all computers."

============================================================================
==

Attached please find signature pages for:
GE  Consent, Consent of Director for transaction.
We  will forward signature pages for
Amended LLC Agreement, Consent of Director  and Members tomorrow morning
upon receipt from Fed  Ex.

Please confirm that insurance certificates have  been received from the
insurance broker.? It is my understanding that  originals were sent to
Enron.
Thanks.

Susan D. Chow
Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker  LLP
1055 Washington Boulevard
Stamford, Connecticut 06901
(203) 961-7527
(203) 359-3031 (fax)
NOTE NEW EMAIL ADDRESS: susanchow@paulhastings.com

(See attached file: ge_conse.pdf)
(See attached file: salmon_d.pdf)


I created a new deal to capture this flow.  #333712
I also created a deal for July, #333718.

D

Ricky Ellis@ENRON
07/17/2000 03:09 PM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Extend Deal

During the month of June there is flow at meter 6347, but there is no deal.
There is a deal in May (deal 290472), "Could you extend that deal for the
month of June?"


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 03/27/2001
04:02 PM ---------------------------
From: Veronica Espinoza/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/26/2001 08:19 AM
To: Janie Aguayo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diane Anderson/NA/Enron@Enron, Derek
Bailey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jean Bell/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Patricia Boulanger/CAL/ECT@ECT, Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julie
Brewer/NA/Enron@Enron, Lesli Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate, Celeste
Cisneros/NA/Enron@Enron, Sharon Crawford/CAL/ECT@ECT, Richard
Deming/NA/Enron@Enron, Russell Diamond/ENRON@enronXgate, Cindy
Feldman/CAL/ECT@ECT, Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Veronica
Gonzalez/ENRON@enronXgate, Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Walter
Guidroz/ENRON@enronXgate, Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam
Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, Errol
McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Nidia Mendoza/ENRON@enronXgate, Tom
Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Bianca Ornelas/NA/Enron@Enron, Leslie
Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Dianne Seib/CAL/ECT@ECT,
Linda Sietzema/CAL/ECT@ECT, Kim S Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ellen
Wallumrod/NA/Enron@ENRON, Melinda Whalen/CAL/ECT@ECT, Tiffany
Williams/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Credit Report--3/26/01


Debra,

I have made redline changes with comments, please review, and see if
everything is correct.

Thank you,(See attached file: AESNE Special Provision(FINAL)
#5withchanges.doc)

Majed Nachawati
Enron North America
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street
Houston, Texas 77002
Majed.Nachawati@enron.com
713-345-2722 DD
713-646-3393 Fax
 - AESNE Special Provision(FINAL)#5withchanges.doc


Mark and Taffy:
Per my earlier e-mail, here is the other class that I registered for.
Carol
----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 05/16/2000 12:11 PM -----

	Ernie
	Sent by: Carol St Clair
	05/16/2000 12:10 PM

		 To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Class Confirmation - Enron North America Orientation

You are enrolled in the following class:

Enron North America Orientation

Class Days and Times:
  06/15/2000  08:30:00 AM - 04:00:00 PM
Room # & Location: EB552,  Houston
Last Day to Cancel: 06/09/2000
Participant Fee: $300.00
Note:

Please review any prerequisite material to validate your eligibility in this
class.
Your Company and RC will be charged $300.00

If you have any questions, please call the Development Center Team at
713-853-0357.

Thank you.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Bianchi, Rita
Sent:	Wednesday, November 21, 2001 5:37 PM
To:	Gracey, Rosemary; Zadow, Raetta
Cc:	Kirk, Steve; Winckowski, Michele; Darveaux, Mary; Williams, John
Subject:	Low Load GRI changes for 2002

Rosemary - Please forward to everyone in Marketing'
Raetta - Please forward to everyone in Gas Logistics.

The GRI rates will change, effective January 1,2002
Commodity changes from .0070 to .0055
High Load Reservation GRI (default) changes from .090 to .066
Low Load Reservation GRI changes from .0550 to .0407
Small Customer GRI (GS-T contracts) changes from .0110 to .0088

Marketers:
As the attached letter explains, I have redetermined which shippers are considered "Low Load" for the coming year.
The changes from Low to High or High to Low are listed in the letter.  A few customers flip-flop from year to year.  If any of your customers are affected, please advise them before January Reservation invoices go out (February 1, 2002).  NNG files a tariff change for the new rates, but does not file or mail out any notices about changes in a shipper's high/low load status.

John Williams/Gas Logistics - FYI.  The spreadsheet lists legal entities that are in the High Load or Low Load categories for 2002.
If a shipper is not listed, then it will default to the High Load GRI rate.

Call if you have questions.


Hi Pete,

Here's the contract we discussed on the telephone.  To make life easier,
please set the exhibits up as a separate electronic file.  It is a heck of a
cut-and-paste job, but it will really help when we start blacklining docs.

Thanks,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 02/05/2001 10:38
AM ---------------------------

Brian D Barto@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
07/17/2000 08:07 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: karl.silverling@ps.ge.com@ENRON, michael.barnas@ps.ge.com@ENRON,
stephen.swift@ps.ge.com@ENRON, Dale Rasmussen@ECT

Subject: Re: Electronic file of Coyote Springs contract

Executed Contract for Coyote and Change Order #1, with its associated consent
to assignment:

To: Brian D Barto/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
karl.silverling@ps.ge.com, michael.barnas@ps.ge.com, stephen.swift@ps.ge.com
cc:

Subject: Electronic file of Coyote Springs contract

Hi guys,

Could someone send an electronic file of the execution copy of the Coyote
Springs contract?

Thank you,

Kay


The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  ? 2001 Carr Futures

The charts are now available on the web by clicking on the hot link(s)
contained in this email. If for any reason you are unable to receive the
charts via the web, please contact me via email and I will email the charts
to you as attachments.

Crude     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/crude26.pdf
Natural Gas     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/ngas26.pdf
Distillate     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hoil26.pdf
Unleaded     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/unlded26.pdf

Dec WTI/Brent Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/clz-qoz.pdf
Dec Heat Crack     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/heatcrack.pdf
Dec Gas Crack     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/gascrack.pdf
Dec/May Heat Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hoz-hok.pdf
Jan/Feb Heat Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hof-hog.pdf
Nov Gas/Heat Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hux-hox.pdf
Dec Gas/Heat Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/huz-hoz.pdf
Nov/Mar Unlead Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hux-huh.pdf

Nat Gas Strip Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/StripmatrixNG26.pdf
Nat Gas Spread Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SpreadmatrixNG26.pdf

Crude and Products Spread Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SpreadmatrixCL26.pdf

Scott Oblander
312-762-1015
312-762-1014 fax
Carr Futures
150 S. Wacker
Suite 1500
Chicago, IL 60606


---------------------- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 03/21/2000 08:42 AM
---------------------------

Molly Harris
03/20/2000 06:46 PM
To: Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice
Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie
R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian Hunter-Lindsay/LON/ECT@ECT, Coenraad
Basson/LON/ECT@ECT, Bhautik Patel/LON/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, David
Weekes/LON/ECT@ECT, Carrie Southard/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Gillette/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Linda S Bryan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Connie Sutton/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: EOL Credit Responses 3/20

Please find attached Credit's EOL responses for 3/20/00.

Regards
Molly


-----Original Message-----
From: 	FMackin@aol.com@ENRON <mailto:FMackin@aol.com@ENRON> [mailto:IMCEANOTES-FMackin+40aol+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com] <mailto:[mailto:IMCEANOTES-FMackin+40aol+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]>
Sent:	Wednesday, June 06, 2001 10:20 AM
To:	Harris, Stephanie J
Subject:	Law Firm Courtships

I don't have Jim's or Robby's email address.  Steph, will you forward this to
them along with the attached.
I get the impression that from time to time different law firms court Enron
to obtain a significant portion of the company's legal work.
The attached paper which I received from my subscription to Law.com,
discusses the future is now concept by which large companies like Enron will
select law firms to provide services.
If the time is not right, it might be a good idea to place this in a file for
future reference.
Pat

 - Firms investigate online bidding of legal services.doc


Bernice,

I added the unique 4 digit Data codes to column T of the attached spreadsheets.

Let me know if there is anything else you need from me.

Kam


FYI.  Please check into this....
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 11/08/2000
12:51 PM ---------------------------

Phil Clifford
11/08/2000 12:32 PM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: David J Botchlett/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: marketing quote

i wanted to follow up on our earlier phone conversation regarding a marketing
quote. i spoke with troy about the product he was looking for, a strip of
flat price quotes for 7 months, and the reason for the time delay. in order
to give an accurate fixed priced quote on a month by month basis i needed to
update the merc quotes on each front to back for the 7 months. this was going
to take approx 5 minutes, the time needed to get spreads from the floor, and
this was the amt of time i told troy i needed. i also explained i could quote
it as a strip package vs settle live.( i believe this all took place Friday.)

if memory serves me, early Monday the customer asked for the quote as a strip
package. we quoted it live, but i don't believe they liked the offer.
considering that i quoted the mkt on both the bid and ask, which was a good
25-30pts tighter than the floor i am not sure what the problem was. as i see
it, if they did not like the offer i provided they were free to take me out
of the bid i showed them on the two way.

kind regards,

Phil Clifford


Dear Bart

As per my VM, attached please find the Escrow Agreement which the Escrow
Agent, La Salle Bank, would like to use. Could you please review this for us
and let us know your thoughts?

I am also attaching a description of the Escrow procedures that we have
tentatively agreed with our counterpart. Those will need to be incorporated
in the Escrow Agreement. I can do that but I thought you might be interested
to have the "full picture".

Please call me when you get a chance and I can more fully explain our role in
the escrow ararngement.

Thank you,

Shari Stack
Enron North America, Legal Department
Tel: (713) 853-9477
----- Forwarded by Shari Stack/HOU/ECT on 12/01/2000 10:21 AM -----

Gayle:

Mark LoIacono requested that I send you my model escrow agreement.
Although it is prepared as a "one-size-fits-all" agreement, please feel
free to revise it to fit the purposes of your proposed escrow.  In addition
to being in-house counsel for LaSalle Bank's Corporate Trust Services
Division, I also manage the Escrow Business Unit.  If you have any
questions, please contact me directly.

Thank you for providing LaSalle Bank with this opportunity.

Russell C. Bergman, Esq.
First Vice President
LaSalle Bank National Association
135 South LaSalle Street, Suite 1960
Chicago, Illinois  60603
(312) 904-5817 (Direct)
(312) 904-2236 (Facsimile)
E-Mail: russell.bergman@abnamro.com

*********************************************************************

 - Escrow_Model.doc


What did we hear from FERC on Friday?


News Brief:

Duke Energy Gas Transmission Buys MHP Gas Storage frrom NiSource
Duke Energy Gas Transmission Corp. has entered into a definitive agreement
to purchase the natural gas salt cavern storage business commonly known as
Market Hub Partners (MHP) from subsidiaries of NiSource Inc., for $250
million in cash plus the assumption of $150 million in debt.

This new line of business for DEGT has 23 billion cubic feet (Bcf) of
storage capacity with expansion capability. The stock purchase is expected
to close later this year, pending Federal Trade Commission approval.


---------------------- Forwarded by Doug Leach/HOU/ECT on 07/10/2000 09:27 AM
---------------------------

	From:  Doug Leach                           07/07/2000 01:53 PM

To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Glencore Fuel Supply Agreement

please call me on Monday morning to discuss
---------------------- Forwarded by Doug Leach/HOU/ECT on 07/07/2000 01:53 PM
---------------------------

Diana Parker@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
07/07/2000 01:50 PM
To: Ermes Melinchon/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Andrea
Gonzalez/NA/Enron@ENRON, Joseph M Galan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Doug Leach@ECT
Subject: Glencore Fuel Supply Agreement

Doug Leach advised that he spoke with Sergio at Glencore yesterday, and
Glencore is satisfied with the June 5 draft (copy attached) of the FSA, with
the exception of 2 matters:
1.  He wants the LIBOR rate on late payments in Section 9.3 to be fixed on a
specific day (e.g., the due date for the payment)
2.  He wants the ENE payment guarantee referenced in Section 9.5 to be
increased to $7MM due to increased fuel prices.
Doug is running these two points by Tom Moran on Monday, but doesn't believe
they will be a problem (with respect to ENE furnishing the guarantee).

I intend to courier execution copies of the FSA to Glencore on Monday, after
we get the confirmation from Tom Moran, unless any of you notify me of a
problem with
these changes.
Regards,
Diana


I just spoke to Stacey Richardson, and, with Georgi Landau gone, she said we should contact her, or Bridgette Anderson, with any Global Contracts questions for the time being.


True.  Especially after I cut E's fat plump rump roast with my dive knife to
chum the waters a little.  Let's shoot for Friday for lunch.  Maybe I go back
to work after that or maybe I don't.  No other three Czech brothers can
cruise so successfully in tight slacks!

Things are going well with little Cynthia.  She is really fun and easy to
talk to.  I am not sure what my intentions are right now but we enjoy each
others company.

Ryan.F.Ruppert@EXXON.sprint.com on 02/23/2000 01:34:52 PM
To: Gerald.Nemec@enron.com
cc:
Subject: RE: What up?

         Date: February 23, 2000
         From: Ruppert, Ryan F.                            R9RUPPE  - AMERICAS
           To: EXT-GERALD.NEMEC(A)ENRON.COM,               GERALDNE - FPEXMAIL
      Subject: RE: What up?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I too, am somewhat hesitant about those large toothed critters, although I'm
sure they'd much rather chomp into Eric's ass-steak rather than my boney
carcass.  I figure if everyone else does it why shouldn't we?

As for lunch, I'd like to get together although we break for lunch around 11
over here and that's more like breakfast for you fat-cat lawyer-types.  I'm
down here all week, so let me know if you want to try for something.  Maybe
Friday would be fun?  I'd have a lot more flexibility in my schedule on that
day.

Looks like Saturday is "pay your friend-dues day" at the Gillaspie Ranch.
Seems like all I do is move his ass.  All I know is that he better keep us
well hydrated.

Anywho, what's up with you and the little lady?  She seemed really together.
Hope things are progressing well--if that's your intentions.

Audi 5000,
Ryan

RYAN F. RUPPERT
Geophysical User Support
Upstream Technical Computing
ExxonMobil Corporation

-----Original Message-----
From: EXT-GERALD.NEMEC(A)ENRON.COM,
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2000 2:19 PM
To: Ruppert, Ryan F.
Cc: EXT-ERIC.GILLASPIE(A)ENRON.COM,
Subject: Re: What up?

Sounds like a good trip if there are spaces available.  I think our dive
captain is checking availability.  Of course our dive captain is also
hesitant about being swallowed whole by a Whale Shark.  I told him that
with a house to remodel that would probably be a blessing.

Let us know what your schedule is.  See if we can't hook up Thursday or
Friday for lunch.  I open and I am sure Nacious E would be too.

Ryan.F.Ruppert@EXXON.sprint.com on 02/23/2000 09:54:03 AM

To:   Eric.Gillaspie@enron.com, Gerald.Nemec@enron.com
cc:
Subject:  What up?

         Date: February 23, 2000
         From: Ruppert, Ryan F.                            R9RUPPE  -
AMERICAS
           To: EXT-ERIC.GILLASPIE(A)ENRON.COM,             ERICGILL -
FPEXMAIL
               EXT-GERALD.NEMEC(A)ENRON.COM,               GERALDNE -
FPEXMAIL
      Subject: What up?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hey you hosers, what's up with swimming with the fishys?  Are we going to
check out those hammerheads or what?

Sorry about the mix up on lunch yesterday.  Let me know if you want to try
again.

OUT

RYAN F. RUPPERT
Geophysical User Support
Upstream Technical Computing
ExxonMobil Corporation


Amerex

Mike Swerzbin
deal 496303
Amerex shows Enron as sell

deal 496304
Amerex shows Enron as buyer


Dear Richard,

While our weekly New Releases email takes a break for the holidays, we're sending you this Special Offers email, full of great ways for you to save at CDNOW.

If you'd like to receive a Special Offers email like this every week, click below to subscribe. Otherwise, do nothing and your New Releases email will next week.
Enjoy!

http://cdw01.cdnow.com/Click?q=50-M_6BIR0jwufC3eCAS5ZwjMQgIRRR

======================================================================

Which Albums Made the Top 100?
Browse all of CDNOW's hottest sellers, and own them for less! Every album on our Top 100 list -- from Pink Floyd's "Echoes" to Garth Brooks' "Scarecrow" -- is up to 30% off for as long as it's on the list. Our Top 100 list is always changing, so check back often for new titles (and new savings!)

http://cdw01.cdnow.com/Click?q=66-kDo_IyW0T9_mSOxsPElkNGmNEsRR

______________________________________________________________________

Own the Latest DVDs First!
Be the first kid on the block to own hot-off-the-press DVDs like "Scary Movie 2," "The Princess Diaries," "The Fast and the Furious," "Center Stage," "Jurassic Park III," and many more! Put your DVD player to work with these brand new flicks, loaded with extra features.

http://cdw01.cdnow.com/Click?q=7b-pr__IBZ0g9kVmUkbDPFC251hZ9RR

______________________________________________________________________

Your Wish List WILL Be on Sale Soon!
Treat yourself to everything you didn't get for the holidays!  From January 2 until January 14, 2002 at 9:00 a.m., EST, take $2.00 off ALL eligible items $9.99 or more, currently saved to your Wish List*.  If you don't have a Wish List, this is the perfect time to start one?  Go to your Wish List.

http://cdw01.cdnow.com/Click?q=90-wHPMQ_IJRUNgirgVbLDiZ8nOJsRR

______________________________________________________________________

Get New Music Now!
Want new music? We happen to have some -- lots! Click over to CDNOW today to order the latest music from Britney Spears, Nas, Michael Jackson, Sting, Enya, and others! Keep your ears on their toes by treating yourself to a healthy dose of fresh music. Browse CDNOW's new release albums today.

http://cdw01.cdnow.com/Click?q=a5-DytHQ7Z2SQMurKgsIMv615D7w9RR

______________________________________________________________________

Recapture the classics... Some albums never get old -- just more affordable! Here's your source for many of the best albums ever recorded, all $9.99 or less! Choose from thousands of titles from such artists as Bob Dylan, The Who, Public Enemy, Count Basie, Willie Nelson, and others.

http://cdw01.cdnow.com/Click?q=ba-m-95QXpMTfSNcYhxh5gMlFo0WRRR

Thanks,

Sean Sullivan
E-Commerce Manager, CDNOW

.....................................................
*Items eligible for the $2.00 discount must be priced at $9.99 or more and have been saved to your Wish List before 11:59 p.m., EST on January 1, 2002. This discount can only be applied to one of multiple-quantity items saved to your Wish List. Electronics, accessories, and Digital Music Downloads are not eligible. This offer is not combinable with any other promotions or discounts, and applies only to customers purchasing items from their own Wish List. The Wish List Sale ends at 9:00 a.m., EST on January 14, 2002.

The prices of the items featured in this email were accurate at
the time the email was sent, but may be subject to change.

You received this email because you are an account holder at CDNOW.
If you'd prefer not to receive this weekly New Releases message in
the future, go to the link below:
http://cdw01.cdnow.com/Click?q=cf-eb0-r8wFHtYpIThJa49Mgz9GoRRR

Or, if you'd like to receive different information from us,
you can always update your music preferences by simply going
to the MY CDNOW Preferences page at:
http://cdw01.cdnow.com/Click?q=e5-9ZYOQgyDlt51gwHjnKixoUTi9sRR

For questions regarding your account, order status or to
contact our Customer Service department, please visit our
Help Desk.
http://cdw01.cdnow.com/Click?q=fa-FmbNQhOTbI0UZOstvGSSmkfJf9RR
.....................................................
NR:1624186


Dear Friends and Colleagues,

Effective immediately, I have returned to the University of
Pennsylvania.

The usual automatically-generated contact info should appear below;
please update your files.

Best regards,

Frank

--
Francis X. Diebold

Department of Economics
University of Pennsylvania
3718 Locust Walk
Philadelphia, PA 19104-6297

fdiebold@mail.sas.upenn.edu
http://www.ssc.upenn.edu/~diebold

(215) 898-1507  telephone
(215) 573-4217  fax


One of Market Risk's primary responsibilities is to review Enron's trading
activities and provide feedback to management, and management's expectation
is that this is feedback and analysis is provided at the beginning of the
Houston trading day.  Global Risk Management Operations in Houston is now
providing Market Risk with a Enron Consolidated Preliminary DPR prior to 8
a.m. Houston time, for use in Market Risk's morning meeting where we review
all of Enron's trading activities from the prior day.  The only information
missing from this is the UK, and I understand we do not receive the London
DPR until 10:30a.m, 4:30pm your time.
I'm sure you're working toward obtaining a final DPR earlier in the day, but
meanwhile, we'd like to obtain a preliminary DPR that Global Ops can
consolidate for Houston management's use first thing in the morning, as
decisions need to be made each day based on Enron's consolidated exposure,
etc..   We understand they're preliminary, but we work off preliminary #s
from Houston, and I expect with the 6 hour time difference, your preliminary
#s will be much firmer than ours.  We can start with just P/L and VaR, so
it's not that many #s we need.  I'm hoping when we get the RisktRAC feeds
complete we'll be able to see positions earlier as well.

Please let us know when we can begin receiving this information.

Thank you,

Cassandra Schultz
VP, Market Risk Management
work 713 853 0429
cell 713 858 2618
home 936 321 2185


---------------------- Forwarded by Sherri Sera/Corp/Enron on 10/27/2000
02:38 PM ---------------------------

Liz M Taylor@ECT
10/27/2000 02:37 PM
To: Sherri Sera/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: ENW Org Chart

Sherri,

Will these two pages help you?  Louise Kitchen and Philippe Bibi are Greg's
direct reports.  All the commercial folks roll up to Louise and Technical
folks (slide 2) report up to Bibi.  EOL (Andy Zipper & Team) report to Louise
Kitchen.