I just noticed a glitch, which I'll fix.  Do you have any comments?

Fred Mitro@ECT
01/30/2001 02:58 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Rusty Stevens/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: SPA - PSEG Transaction

Rusty is in Florida today through Friday.  I received the hard copy you sent
down (thanks) and will review it.   From your perspective, is this document
ready to be sent out?  I would like to get it in PSEG's hands ASAP.  Let me
know.

Fred

Kay Mann@ENRON
01/30/2001 11:57 AM
To: Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: SPA - PSEG Transaction

Have you asked Rusty?  I believe Kathleen gave him a hard copy yesterday.  I
made the changes myself.

Fred Mitro@ECT
01/30/2001 09:25 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Rusty Stevens/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: SPA - PSEG Transaction

Kay:

What is the status of the draft Securities Purchase Agreement for the sale of
ENA's Illinois project entities?

Please let me know.  Rusty and I need to review it before sending it out to
PSEG.

Thanks,
Fred


$933  to Dean Witter


Elizabeth,

Texas and Wellhead were grouped under George.  I adjusted Texas, but not Wellhead.  I also added the market hubs that we trade, under the pipeline section.  Let me know if you have any questions.

D

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Webb, Elizabeth
Sent:	Thursday, October 11, 2001 9:01 AM
To:	Lamadrid, Victor; Kinsey, Lisa; Sullivan, Patti; Jaquet, Tammy; Greif, Donna; Smith, George F.; Olinger, Kimberly S.; Farmer, Daren J.; Calcagno, Suzanne; Williams, Jason (Trading)
Cc:	Superty, Robert; Newton, Lisbet; Garcia, Clarissa; Schrab, Mark L.
Subject:	RE: Logistics PowerPoint presentation

Hi All,

This is just a friendly reminder that I need the information for the Gas Logistics PowerPoint presentation by tomorrow, Friday, October 12th.

Thanks for your time and assistance.   Please call me with any questions.

Thanks,
Elizabeth
x51694
 << File: Gas Logistics PowerPoint1.ppt >>  Presentation is located at O:/Logistics/Management/Presentations/Gas Logistics PowerPoint1.ppt

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Webb, Elizabeth
Sent:	Thursday, October 04, 2001 2:56 PM
To:	Lamadrid, Victor; Kinsey, Lisa; Sullivan, Patti; Jaquet, Tammy; Greif, Donna; Smith, George F.; Olinger, Kimberly S.; Farmer, Daren J.; Calcagno, Suzanne; Williams, Jason (Trading)
Cc:	Superty, Robert; Newton, Lisbet; Garcia, Clarissa; Schrab, Mark L.
Subject:	Logistics PowerPoint presentation

Hi All,

Per the discussion at today's staff meeting, I would like you all to review the attached presentation and put in general information for your particular desk/cost center in the respective slides.   I have one slide for each desk/cost center called " Desk/Cost Center X Information" and another called "Asset Management Deals" if this is applicable to you.

Please return the attached presentation with your additions and/or changes to me by Friday, October 12th.    Please call me if you have any questions or concerns.

Also, please feel free to utilize me as a resource for any PowerPoint presentations, data gathering that you may need done.

Thanks,
Elizabeth

Presentation is located on O:/logistics/management/Gas Logistics PowerPoint1

 << File: Gas Logistics PowerPoint1.ppt >>
Elizabeth Webb
elizabeth.webb@enron.com
713-345-1694


Carole C. Frank
Enron Net Works

713.345.3960 work
713.446.9307 cell


-----Original Message-----
From: Banks, Charlotte
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 10:18 AM
To: Reyna, Martha; Dade, Dorothy; Randle, Claudette; 'NDWMCCARY@email.msn.com'; 'charon.little@parkerdrilling.com'; Mitchell, Willie; Alexander, Dana; Davis, Dana
Subject: FW: stay out the mall on halloween

Wanted to share. why that the risk.
-----Original Message-----
From: Prince, Nicole
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 10:10 AM
To: 'Richelleprince@hotmail.com'; Cassel, Brenda; Urell, Jacqui; Fields, Erica; Adamo, Emily; Henderson, Sandra; Banks, Charlotte; 'mrw56@hotmail.com'
Subject: FW: stay out the mall on halloween

I'm just passing this on.
-----Original Message-----
From: Denise Bradford [mailto:denisegw1@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 10:08 AM
To: nakai.ivy@compassbnk.com; Prince, Nicole
Subject: FW: stay out the mall on halloween

-----Original Message-----
From: Alexander, Dasha D. [mailto:ddalexan@TexasChildrensHospital.org] <mailto:[mailto:ddalexan@TexasChildrensHospital.org]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 8:57 AM
Subject: FW: stay out the mall on halloween

Sincerely yours,

Dasha Franklin

Accounts Payable

832/824-2095

-----Original Message-----

From:   Deason, D. Celisa

Sent:   Wednesday, October 10, 2001 8:37 AM

To:     'silentrunner@rocketmail.com'; 'Leslie Rocio (E-mail)'; 'Charlotte Day (E-mail)'; 'Erica Johnson (E-mail)'; 'Jamie Watson (E-mail)'; Love, Felicia N.; Bias, Nicole; Carroll, Katrina C.; Saenz, Lisa; Retzloff, Kay; Pufal, Denise; Alexander, Dasha D.; Washington, Bridget D.

Subject:        FW: stay out the mall on halloween

Celisa D. Deason

Accountant

Texas Children's Pediatric Associates

(832) 824-6901

cddeason@texaschildrenshospital.org <mailto:cddeason@texaschildrenshospital.org>

THIS WAS FORWARDED FROM A FRIEND OF MINE ON THE POLICE FORCE!!!!!

FYI......................................

 I think you all know that I don't send out

 hoaxes and don't do the  reactionary thing and send out anything that

crosses my path.  This

one, however, is a friend of a friend and I've given it enough credibility

in my mind that I'm writing it up and sending it  out to all of you.

 My friend's friend was dating a guy from

 Afghanistan up until a month ago.

 She had a date with him around 9/6 and was stood up.  She was

understandably upset and went to his home to find it completely emptied.

On 9/10, she received a letter from her  boyfriend explaining that he wished

he could tell her why he had left and that he was sorry it had

to be like that.  The part worth mentioning is that he BEGGED her not to get

on any commercial airlines on 9/11 and to not to

 go any malls on Halloween.  As soon as everything happened on the 11th, she

called the FBI and has since turned over the letter.

This is not an email that I've received and

 decided to pass on.  This came from a phone conversation with a long-time

friend of mine last night.

 I may be wrong, and I hope I am.  However, with

 one of his warnings being correct and devastating, I'm not willing to take

the chance on the second and wanted to make sure that people I cared about

had the same information

 that I did.

>

>

>

>

>

> _______________________________________________________

> <http://inbox.excite.com>

>

>

******************************************************************

******************************************************************


We don't have storage on PG&E do we?  I think that is park and lend.  What do
you think?  I have put together the schedules for Spindletop and Bammel.

Dave

---------------------- Forwarded by David Baumbach/HOU/ECT on 03/12/2001
01:55 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Jim Pond @ ENRON                           03/12/2001 12:47 PM

To: Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M
Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Valdes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimat
Singla/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Greg Whiting/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: Physical Storage

Please provide the information requested below as soon as possible.
Improvement in this process will help minimize flash-to-actual variances.

To: Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M
Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: John Valdes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimat Singla/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Physical Storage

Has any progress been made on this?  So far, I have only received information
on Cove Point.

We show that there is physical storage on the following pipelines:

CENTRAL -  Mid Continent, Moss Bluff, NGPL, and Reliant.
TEXAS - Bammel, Centana, and PG&E Texas Pipeline.
WEST - Colorado, PG&E (one contract), PG&E Gas Transmission Northwest,
Questar, and Williston
EAST - Cove Point, Dominion, Columbia Gas, Gulf South (Koch), National Fuel,
Sonat, Tennessee, Transco, Egan, and Napoleonville.
SITHE - Union

Please provide the requested information below.

Thanks for your help in this matter.

To: Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M
Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: John Valdes/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Physical Storage

Gas Accounting is initiating a project to ensure consistent treatment of
physical storage between flash and the GL.  To that end, please provide the
book codes and cost of inventory schedules that you have for each of the
physical storage facilities.  We will also need what you show as the 1/31/01
inventory balance for each.

David,
I believe that we already have the information for Bammel.  Please provide
the info for other Texas desk storage, if any.

I would like to have this information as soon as possible.

Thanks, everyone.


Its no big deal.  I just had really bad asthma when I went down to wilsons
house and he had that dog and ended up sleeping in my car which kind of
sucked.  If they are going to be outside or in the garage I may still come
down Friday night or just come down Saturday and stay the night saturday
night down there with you guys.  I will let you all know tonight


MEXICO

-	Power strike set for March 16 in Mexico City

Some 35,000 members of the Mexican Union of Electrical Workers plan to strike the Mexico City Electric Company on Friday, March 16th at 12 Noon. The union is demanding a 29 percent salary increase and the company is offering nothing. The two sides are not even talking. The union is concerned that the government may try to force the electrical workers to stay on their jobs or bring in replacements. The union is also opposed to the privatization of the electric company and its leader has charged that privatization would bring higher electric rates to meet the profit demands of foreign investors. The company principally provides electrical service to Mexico City and the states of Mexico, Morelos, Hidalgo and Puebla. It may be prudent to begin planning for possible power shortages in these regions. (Pinkerton, March 14, 2001)


RTO Week

 <?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />

Day 4 - October 18, 2001

Afternoon Session

Standardizing Markets, Business, and Other Practices

Panelists for this discussion were:  Sarah Barpoulis, PG&E National Energy Group; William P. Boswell, GISB; Bill Burkes (substituting for David J. Christiano), City Utilities of Springfield, Missouri; David N. Cook, NERC General Counsel; Michael Kormos PJM Interconnection; LeRoy Koppendrayer, Minnesota Public Utilities Commission; and Marty Mennes, Florida Power & Light Company.

General Observations

The Commissioners were all present the majority of the time (Massey left late in the  afternoon).  FERC Staff was active in the discussion; however, the commissioners were very active as well, asking perhaps as much as 70% of all questions.  There was a general consensus that standards were needed; much discussion focused simply on how much and by who. The Commission seemed very interested in leaning what they needed to do to move the industry forward and how far they needed to go.  Panelists urged the need to mover forward as quickly as possible, but both they and FERC seemed to recognize that some of the issues regarding standardized market design and such needed to be addressed before RTOs could really begin to move forward.  There was discussion on identifying which industry group (NERC or GISB) would take the reins in the future.  On an interesting tangential note, there was noticeable conflict between NERC and GISB, with veiled insults between the two organizations somewhat common during the discussions.

FERC Deliverables

A great deal of the discussions focused on identifying what the industry needed from the Commission.  Staffers probed all panelists to find what they felt was critical.

The first major topic was "How many RTOs?  What is their scope?"  All panelists seemed to agree that this question needed to be answered immediately by FERC, in strong definitive language.  N o one offered any specific language, but seemed to be urging FERC to issue a formal statement.

The next topic was, "What will be standard market design?"  Panelists varied on this, but most felt strong guidance from FERC is urgent.  Some urged for one mandatory design for North America, one supported a set of rigid standard designs, one supported a single design with requests for exceptions (followed by an in-depth review process), and one seemed to prefer the current situation.

The commission in general seemed to be very interested in understanding what the industry needed to move forward.  They continually visited this topic throughout their discussions, asking questions like, "Do we need to issue a Mega-Order that addresses all these issues?" and, "How much detail do you need us to provide?"   General feel from the panelsists seemed to be they wanted strong leadership in this areas.  Kormos and Burkes went so far as to say FERC should "Mandate as much as they felt comfortable - and then go a little further."  Others seemed to be a little worried about this idea, but in general did not oppose the concept, citing only general warnings and the need for cautious investigation.

One item of interest: Wood referred to the filing made by the Electronic Scheduling Collaborative and specifically asked if the items identified in the "RTO Design and RTO Implementation" section would address many of the questions and uncertainty facing the industry with regard to RTO design.  Kormos indicated that clear and specific answers to these questions specifying a course of action would go a long way toward guiding the industry.  The section to which Wood referred was one that I wrote, and asked the following questions:

?         Congestion Management - When Operational Security Violations occur, how is the system to be stabilized in a fair and equitable manner that is nonetheless efficient?  Will LMP based systems be standard, or will there be others that must be accommodated?

?         Transmission Service  - Are transmission services required to schedule ("covered" schedules only), or are they risk management tools protecting from congestion charges (both "covered" and "uncovered" schedules are allowed)?

?         Loop Flows  - Are contract-path based or flow-based transmission services appropriate?  If contract-path based, how are parallel path issues to be addressed?

?         Grandfathered Transmission Service - Should contracts existing prior to RTO development be transferred, or is there an equitable way to retire those contracts?  Are there other solutions?

?         Energy Imbalance Markets - How are imbalance markets to function? Will they serve as real-time energy markets (support unbalanced schedules), be limited to supplying needs of imbalance service (require balanced schedules), or will they be required at all?

?         Ancillary Services - Will ancillary service markets be developed in standard ways?  Will entities be required to actually schedule ancillary services (required to schedule), or will they be treated primarily as financial instruments (protecting against real-time POLR charges)?

?         Losses - Can we utilize the imbalance markets to support losses?  Can we create specific loss standards that facilitate the scheduling process, or must we support methods that are currently in tariffs, but technically unwieldy?

?         Non-Jurisdictionals - How are non-jurisdictionals to be integrated into the new world?  Should systems be designed with the assumption that non-jurisdictional will be part of an RTO?  Or should they be designed to treat each NJE as a separate entity?

Hopefully, FERC will use this section as a template to answer these critical questions in an assertive manner, and give some solid direction in which to move. Kormos emphasized the need for concrete answers to these questions, pointing out that vague answers (i.e., "do congestion management") will take a year or two to resolve, but specific answers (i.e., "LMP with financial hedging instruments") will take only months.  The Commission asked Mike about moving forward, and he told them that effectively, it was impossible to move forward with implementation without getting these issues addressed.

Now for a  funny point - One of the commissioners (I think Breathitt) referred to some concerns expressed in the Northwest that their high concentration of hydro power makes LMP inefficient for the Northwest.  Kormos flat out said, "My profession is understanding how power systems work, and I don't believe that that statement is true."  He then backpedaled a bit and said that it would need more study, but he stood by his statement that the assertion by the Northwest interests was false.

NERC and GISB

A great deal of discussion focused around the need for a single standard-setting organization.  Massey went so far as to ask, "Are we looking at a beauty contest between NERC and GISB?"  Cook and Boswell then went into several short polite jabs at each other's organizations.  Other participants continually reiterated the need for ONE, INDEPENDENT organization.  Interestingly, Boswell was very emphatic about the established trust and respect in GISB, while Cook preferred to only talk about the "new" structure of NERC and did not focus on its history.

Brownell offered some not-too-subtle passive support of GISB by pointedly asking both Cook and Boswell if they lobbied political positions (i.e., were they not only an organization but also a stakeholder?).  GISB was easily able to say they were not, but NERC of course had to admit to their romancing of Congress and the Bush administration for reliability legislation. Point, Brownell.

Mennes acted as somewhat of a supporter for NERC, playing Dave Cook's yes-man.  He probably did them a little bit of harm by pointing to NERC's supposed "successes," such as TLR and E-Tag.  If staffers have tenure, they will likely remember that these "successes" have not been so successful, resulting in several filings and interventions.  We may also wish to file comments in specific objection to these claims, to refresh their memory and to show the pretty picture Marty painted was in fact a fiction.

There was a little discussion about splitting reliability and market issues, but general consensus was that I could not be done.  There was also some talk of folding NERC under GISB/EISB.

The arguments began winding down after a some time, and Boswell strongly urged the Commission to speak to industry executives and advocacy group leadership to see whether NERC or GISB should lead the industry forward.  NERC somewhat less enthusiastically supported this position.  In general, I would say it was a close fight but GISB came out more on top.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Andy Rodriquez
Regulatory Affairs - Enron Corp.
andy.rodriquez@enron.com
713-345-3771


Attached is a preliminary assessment of Mariner based upon our April 6 review


Attached, please find Enron's proposed amendment to ABX 18 regarding the
rate freeze which was prepared by Mike Day.

 - Amendments for ABX-18 - version 1-30-01.doc


That's fine. I was just looking for TW only for our rating agency package.
Thanks,
kevin

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Corman, Shelley
Sent:	Friday, February 15, 2002 2:07 PM
To:	Howard, Kevin A.
Subject:	RE: 2001 Throughput.

Kevin,
We can get ETS-related pipe throughput for 2001 (and Rick has subsequently sent the TW 2001 data).  But we won't have non Enron pipeline throughput until they publish.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Howard, Kevin A.
Sent:	Friday, February 15, 2002 1:06 PM
To:	Dietz, Rick; Ratner, Michael
Cc:	Thames, Davis; Corman, Shelley
Subject:	RE: 2001 Throughput.

I'm confused - I thought we had throughput data on a more timely manner? Is it the specific format that is the problem or the data itself? If we want to estimate it, that would be fine also.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dietz, Rick
Sent:	Friday, February 15, 2002 11:17 AM
To:	Ratner, Michael
Cc:	Thames, Davis; Howard, Kevin A.; Corman, Shelley
Subject:	RE: 2001 Throughput.

Unfortunately, I can only (immediately) help by providing throughput data for the Enron pipelines that was recently provided for another data request that covered the period 1996 - 2000.   It is attached below and has a tab for Transwestern.  The 2001 FERC Form 2 delivery data is not yet available since the Form 2 will not be completed until April 30, 2002.  Please let me know if you have difficulty finding the data elsewhere and I will ask the TW marketing or regulatory groups if they have any contacts.

Rick

 << File: Pipeline Capacity and T-put - NNG - TW - FGT.xls >>

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ratner, Michael
Sent:	Friday, February 15, 2002 10:17 AM
To:	Dietz, Rick
Cc:	Thames, Davis; Howard, Kevin A.
Subject:	2001 Throughput.

Kevin Howard suggested that I contact you regarding some data for the attached slide.  I am looking for average throughput for four pipes in 2001.  Please let me know if you have this information.

Thank you,

Michael

 << File: 2001 Throughput.ppt >>


You have received this message because someone has attempted to send you an e-mail from outside of Enron with an attachment type that Enron does not allow into our messaging environment. Your e-mail has been quarantined and is being held at the MailSweeper server.

Sender:  Gisoon@btinternet.com
Date:  Tue, 05 Feb 2002 18:44:36 +0000
Subject:  To provide a link to another
Attachment Type: Scenarios/Incoming/Inbound BAT Catcher: A filename matching the file mask was detected: 'click.bat'.

If the intended email is of valid business-related content and you believe it requires Enron resources to retrieve it, you may call your Help Desk and ask to have it released from quarantine and delivered to your e-mail Inbox. Your message will be scanned and checked for viruses prior to requested release.  If it contains a virus or there is reason to suspect it is malicious code, it will not be delivered.

North American Resolution Center: 713 853 1411
European Resolution Center: 0044 207 78 36777
EES Help Desk: 888 853 9797
ETS Solution Center: 713 345 4745 (Houston) or 402 398 7454 (Omaha)

Please DO NOT reply to this address as it is not a monitored system mailbox.


Terry,

Not sure if you look after James's deals as well as John Singer, but
hopefully you can help with this.

Could you please look at deals QB6364.1 / 220477 and QB6332.1 / 220477, they
should match up with James's deals below, but they don't ....?

Do they need to be revised ?

Rgds
Ellen

---------------------- Forwarded by Ellen Wallumrod/NA/Enron on 12/08/2000
02:52 PM ---------------------------

DEBRA PERLINGIERE@ECT
12/08/2000 11:52 AM
To: Ellen Wallumrod/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Cedar Resources

Attached is Jim's e-mail regarding Cedar Resources deals.  We have a
disparity.   I will confirm as below unless I hear from you as different.

Thanks
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490

----- Forwarded by Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT on 12/08/2000 11:47 AM -----

	James T Javins@EES
	12/08/2000 11:29 AM

		 To: Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Cedar Resources

There were two Cedar Resource deals:

 No. 1   12/1/2000 through 11/30/2002 (two years)  1000/month @ $4.83/dth

 No. 2 12/1/2000 through 11/30/2001 (one year)  1500/month @ $5.30/dth

Hope this helps.

Jim


I will be on vacation, but Terry Kowalke and Steve January can cover for
	me.  Thanks. Lynn


Louise, further to our conversation of yesterday... here is a list ( in order of priority) that I have reviewed with the Denver office.  In all cases, if Fred's group is able to make a case that the CFO truly is the financial contact, then we are prepared to leave as is.... otherwise as per Mark's note, I would like to clarify the marketing role regarding all Rockies and San Juan producers ( both physical and paper ) and transfer the primary responsibilities back to the Denver office as we had always planned.

Pls review and advise if you need anything further.

BT

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Whitt, Mark
Sent:	Friday, October 19, 2001 10:05 AM
To:	Tycholiz, Barry
Subject:	Middle Market Customers that Denver would like full responsibility for

The following customers are currently covered by Fred Lagrasta's middle market desk primarily for derivative transactions.  In all cases except for Hallwood, ENA Denver has a relationship with these customers that primarily covers their physical business, we would like to expand that business to cover their Derivative business as well.  The list is based on priority.  We would be willing to cover them for their West Gas business only.  Fred could continue to cover their East, Central and Oil/Liquids business.

Xcel Energy (PSCo) and affiliate e Prime.
Devon Energy
Cross Timbers
Hallwood Energy
Forest Oil
Prima
Patina Oil and Gas
Westport


----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 12/13/2000 09:02 AM -----

	Denis O'Connell
	12/13/2000 07:13 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Matthew Dawson/LON/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Morgan Stanley Capital Services, Inc. ("MSCS")

Sara - I would be very grateful if you could have the attached executed and
faxed to Matt Flett at MS in London, with a copy to myself asap.

Many thanks for your assistance.

Best regards,

Denis

Denis O'Connell
Senior Counsel
Enron Europe Limited
Tel. +4402077834828
Fax. +4402077839238

From: Sara Shackleton on 12/12/2000 09:35 CST
To: Matthew Dawson/LON/ECT@ECT, Denis O'Connell/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Morgan Stanley Capital Services, Inc. ("MSCS")

Matt and Denis:

I spoke with Matthew Flett about an hour ago and he advised that
EnronCredit.com Limited had finalized its ISDA.  I requested a copy burt he
has not yet sent it over.  Both ENE and ENA want to execute masters with MSCS
and we would like to work from your document.

Can you email me a copy?

Thanks.  Sara


The revenue impact of the in-service delay of the Red Rock Expansion is as follows:

	 Volume			Plan		Revenue	Month

trsp	13,300/d	44 days		$  .05		$ 30,000	(June & July)
fuel	    341/d	30 days		$2.57		$ 26,000	(June)
fuel	    341/d	14 days		$2.64		$ 13,000	(July)

trsp/fuel	40,000/d	30 days		    0		      0		(June - made no subscription assumption in Plan)
trsp	40,000/d	14 days		$ .38		$213,000	(July)
fuel	  1,026/d	14 days		$2.64		$ 38,000	(July)
							________
Total							$320,000

(Fuel calculated at 2.5% upside)


Three cheers for our neighbor, Brad Odom, who has successfully negotiated the removal of the 18,000 sofas and other junk that had piled up next to the building at the corner of Hopkins and Fairview!

This Saturday morning, Brad, and volunteers (anyone who wants to help - bring your shovel and come along) will be landscaping the area, with funds donated by the owner of the property.  The landscaping is being done in an effort to discourage future dumpings in this spot.

Over and above the call of duty - these are East Montrose residents!

Amy B

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
 <http://rd.yahoo.com/M=213858.1650662.3186813.1261774/D=egroupweb/S=1705044493:HM/A=763352/R=0/*http://www.classmates.com/index.tf?s=5085>
  <http://us.adserver.yahoo.com/l?M=213858.1650662.3186813.1261774/D=egroupmail/S=1705044493:HM/A=763352/rand=976408947>

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
emca-unsubscribe@egroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.


Colton and I will not be able to attend.  Sorry for the late response.
Have a great time.

>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	"Suchman, Mark C"
> <Mark.Suchman@bakerpetrolite.com>@ENRON
> [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Suchman+2C+20Mark+20C+22+20+3CMark+2ESuchman+40b
> akerpetrolite+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
> Sent:	Thursday, June  7, 2001 10:53 AM
> To:	Butch Butcher (E-mail); David Benninger (E-mail); Don Delozier
> (E-mail); Ed Fallik (E-mail); Jimmy Dagget (E-mail); Joe Hays
> (E-mail); John Byrd (E-mail); Lou TenHave (E-mail); Paul Stehr
> (E-mail); Rod Wiggins (E-mail); Ron Hancock (E-mail); Scott Neal
> (E-mail); Troy Utz (E-mail)
> Subject:	Beach Outing
>
> So far we have a pretty good turn out for the camp out.  The rest of
> you
> that have not rsvp'd can still let me know by first thing tomorrow.  I
> know
> you're waiting for those baseball tournament schedules to decide.  The
> only
> thing I need to know is if you will be there for dinner, otherwise
> come and
> go as you wish.
>
> If you decide to join us later and we are not at the house, we are at
> the
> beach or at the water slide down the street.  Any questions call our
> cell
> phones.  Rod at 713-249-9300 and me at 281-389-9366.
>
> Ya Ta Hey,
>
> Mark Suchman
> Sr. Systems Analyst
> Baker Petrolite
> 281-276-5728
>


Bob,

I responded to another message with the correct address.

My last name is Kaminski, not Kaminsky (Slavic names end in ski). This is
the source of the confusion.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/27/2000
08:13 AM ---------------------------

Robert Brooks <rebrooks@earthlink.net> on 03/24/2000 12:05:03 PM
Please respond to "rebrooks@rbac.com" <rebrooks@rbac.com>
To: "'vkamins@enron.com'" <vkamins@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: FW: Returned mail: User unknown

Hi Vince,
As you can see, the new e-mail address I've been told should work for you
doesn't.
Bob Brooks

-----Original Message-----
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem [SMTP:MAILER-DAEMON@earthlink.net]
Sent: Friday, March 24, 2000 9:49 AM
To: rebrooks@earthlink.net
Subject: Returned mail: User unknown

The original message was received at Fri, 24 Mar 2000 09:48:41 -0800 (PST)
from adsl-63-198-129-100.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [63.198.129.100]

   ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<Vince.J.Kaminsky@enron.com>

   ----- Transcript of session follows -----
... while talking to mailman.enron.com.:
>>> RCPT To:<Vince.J.Kaminsky@enron.com>
<<< 550 <Vince.J.Kaminsky@enron.com>... User unknown
550 <Vince.J.Kaminsky@enron.com>... User unknown

 - ATT00004.att
From: Robert Brooks <rebrooks@earthlink.net>
To: 'GPCM Distribution' <rebrooks@rbac.com>
Subject: FW: Enerfax Daily (http://www.enerfax.com/)
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 09:55:00 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----
=_NextPart_001_01BF9578.6D093F80"

NGPL Storage Capacity Full this Year

    Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America has entered into natural gas
storage contracts for 25 Bcf of firm nominated storage service. The majority
of the capacity was awarded under two separate three-year contracts. NGPL's
nominated storage service, with a capacity of 130 Bcf, is now fully
subscribed until at least 2001.

Bob Brooks

(See complete Enerfax by clicking the icon ATT00001.htm).

-----Original Message-----
From: Enerfax Daily [SMTP:enerfax@fastband.com]
Sent: Friday, March 24, 2000 1:01 AM
To: **aaaenerfax
Subject: Enerfax Daily (http://www.enerfax.com/)

 - ATT00001.htm


I just sent Kroum a little missive on our familiarity with the "killed"
feature, as well as why we often zero out deals (Transmission in particular)
in scheduling only. If I have to teach a course on scheduling for him to
understand how to build this report I will do it, but I am not really dying
to do that.

As far as our situation here, If you can properly kill a deal, you should do
that instead of just zeroing the volume. I quite often have great success
having many terminal server sessions open at once, and doing the slow stuff
through a few different channels of TS.  Even as we speak, I am running one
report for 6 different months, 1 in each of the 5 terminal severs, and one
locally.  I learned that trick in our old winframe system, and it has served
me well.

I have torn my hair out over this cross-portfolio vs cross-desk thing.  I
have explained it to both Kroum, Duong Luu, and Will each at least 3 times.
How hard is it to get the concept that anything we sell to ourselves is not a
physical deal?

I would say just keep sending them to me, so we don't all have to pull our
collective hairs out. The deal you reference below is kind of like a life
preserver thing. When the market makes a sudden move, it is sometimes faster
to 'hit' the deal through EOL then pull it on the traders side.  It's not the
best way to go, but better than losing a bunch of money.

c

   Kate Symes                02/12/2001 03:35 PM

To: Cara Semperger/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Desk-to-Desk v. Cross-Portfolio

I'm not quite sure how this exchange began, but it sounds like Kroum is
referring to several different issues here. First of all, our forward
obligation report does not reflect cross-portfolio deals, an application
issue that Will Smith, and it looks like Kroum as well, has been working on
for the past few weeks.

Also, deal 498488 is a forward deal done on EOL between STSW and their own
desk. I haven't seen a trade WITHIN a desk before, but I'm sure anything is
possible. At any rate, this doesn't look like a cross-portfolio deal at all.
Am I missing something?

As for the zeroed out deals, I'm pretty sure everyone here knows how to
properly kill deals in Enpower; however, it takes so long that sometimes we
simply zero out the volume in the interest of time. I've often wondered if
this litters the system and makes it more confusing for other people to do
their jobs - do you know anything about that?

I just thought I'd ask these questions while the subject was being raised.
Please let me know if I can help facilitate these changes or improvements in
any way.

Thanks,
Kate
---------------------- Forwarded by Kate Symes/PDX/ECT on 02/12/2001 03:18 PM
---------------------------
From: Kroum Kroumov/ENRON@enronXgate on 02/12/2001 11:02 AM CST
To: Cara Semperger/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Monica Lande/PDX/ECT@ECT, Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT

Subject: RE: FW: FWDOBL

             Cara,

      I think the report should work that way even now.

     I think I found a deal like that 498488 between EPMI Southwest and EPMI
Southeast,
     Region R7, please take a look at that when you test the report.

       I saw lots of deals on the report with volume 0 and price 0, they were
entered that way
       in Portland. There might be another reason, but I think someone wanted
to kill the deals.
       There is an option in Deal Entry to do that, if one opens a deal and
right click with the
       mouse on the status (Done), one can kill a deal.

           Kroum

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Semperger, Cara
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2001 1:06 PM
To: Kroumov, Kroum
Cc: Lande, Monica; Symes, Kate
Subject: Re: FW: FWDOBL

The "two sides of a cross-portfolio deal" language is a bit vague and
misleading. A cross-portfolio deal is kind of like a desk to desk deal.
Another Enron book has traded with one of ours.

Two important things need to happen with cross-portfolio deals.
 1. They need to only show on the forward obligation report when "Desk to
Desk" is selected.
 2. They are only financial in nature, no physical delivery is ever done
cross portfolio.

I don't think "both sides" is correct. We need to only see our buy or our
sale when we query for our point.  When the other portfolio queries their
stuff, they should see their side.

C

From: Kroum Kroumov/ENRON@enronXgate on 02/08/2001 11:36 AM CST
To: Cara Semperger/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: FWDOBL

        Cara,

     This is all I have so far. I would appreciate your help to make it
clearer.

     If you find a deal No like that, I think it will make my job easier.

     Thanks,
     Kroum

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Project Manager<Unknown.Man@enron.com>@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Project+20Manager+3CUnknown+2EMan+40enron+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@
ENRON.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2001 10:31 AM
To: Kroumov, Kroum
Subject: FWDOBL

Forward Obs should show two sides of a Cross-Portfolio deal.  Find out what
needs to be done.  Contact Monica
Lande or Kate Symes in Portland for more details


-----Original Message-----
From: Lokay, Michelle
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 9:14 AM
To: Schoolcraft, Darrell; Moore, Jan; Moseley, Debbie; Ward, Linda;
Mulligan, Amy; Strohmeyer, Vincent
Cc: Lohman, TK; Watson, Kimberly
Subject: 03/21 Gas Sales Confirmations


Mike,

    I have 2 extra tickets for the Superbowl.  I was wondering if you want them or knows someone who would.  I was bid $1300/ per so far.

2 in Sec 122 Row 10

**********NOTE**********

The information contained in this email message is intended only for use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify us by telephone (781-830-9199), and destroy the original message. Thank you.


Approved.

Vince Kaminski

Information Risk Management
05/02/2000 09:04 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Approval for Restricted Websit: Web_Research_Pub

Per Kevin Moore, please approve Elena Chilkina's access for the following
restricted website: Web_Research_Pub.

Thank you,
Information Risk Management (et)
---------------------- Forwarded by Information Risk Management/HOU/ECT on
05/02/2000 09:05 AM ---------------------------

	Security Resource Request System
Directory Line Item		Pending Access Processing

Directory Name:			Website: Web_Research_Pub
Service Type:	Grant
Expiration Date:
Comments:			Will send to Vince Kaminski for approval.

	Security Processing
Processing Status:
E-Mail Message:
Comments/Justification:

	General Information           	Request:	KGME-4JTF4C
Requested By:	Kevin G Moore/HOU/ECT	Phone:	713/853-4710
Requested For:	Elena Chilkina/HOU/ECT	Employee Type:
Company:	100038	RC #:	0011
Priority:	High
Comments/Justification:			She will need the same as Michael Sergeev . A few has
been listed there may be
some others that are not listed. Please apply.

		Editing History (Only the last five (5) are shown)

Edit #	Past Authors	Edit Dates
1	Information Risk Management 	05/02/2000 09:03:15 AM


Sorry...........

Attached is the memo.

Thanks

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Luong, Anita
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 2:37 PM
To:	Beck, Sally; Earnest, Scott; Fondren, Mark; Gossett, Jeffrey C.; Hickerson, Gary; Hodges, Georganne; Glover, Sheila; Loibl, Kori; Hall, D. Todd; Carrington, Clara; Prejean, Frank; White, Stacey W.; Swinney, John; Wood, Shelly; Hanson, Kristen J.; Kelly, William
Cc:	Abel, Chris; Wilson, Shona
Subject:	ERMS Discounting Memo

Attached is the ERMS Discounting Memo as of 9/26/01.

Please note that the 9/26/2001 balance is based on the new method of calculating the discounting amount.  The changes that were made are as followed:

			Old method	New method
Physical contract 	55 days		55 days
Financial contract	55 days		5 days
Financial calendar	55 days		38 days

Please let me know if you have questions.

Thanks
Anita


The price is still 91.87.

Keoni Almeida
California Independent System Operator
phone: 916/608-7053
pager:  916/814-7352
alpha page:  9169812000.1151268@pagenet.net
e-mail:  <mailto:kalmeida@caiso.com>

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	CRCommunications
> Sent:	Friday, June 22, 2001 11:34 AM
> To:	ISO Market Participants
> Subject:	CAISO Notice: Update to June 20 Market Notice
>
>  <<MARKET NOTICE 010622_.doc>>
>
> Market Participants:
> Please read the attached explanation of Footnote 14 in the California ISO
> June 20, 2001, Market Notice.
>
> CR Communications
> Client Relations Communications

 - MARKET NOTICE 010622_.doc


Just forwarding the message below.  Ed

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Andrzej_Kabarowski@cargill.com@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Andrzej+5FKabarowski+40cargill+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2001 6:20 AM
To: Sacks, Edward; Andrzej_Kabarowski@cargill.com
Subject: Any further news on the PCGs and ISDA?

Our dox person is trying to contact Sara.  I am transferring to another
business shortly and would like to get this completed before then if
possible.  I would be grateful if you could help push this forward.
Best regards.

=============================
Andrzej Kabarowski
WW Credit Manager
Global Petroleum Trading
NatGas/Electricity Trading
CRMPG
-----------------------------
Tel: 952-984 3664
Fax: 952-984 3763
=============================


Sorry, the attachment was left off the first  e-mail.
 - RP96-347 Req or Rehg.doc


FYI,  attached is a list of matters I am currently working on.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Thanks Mike - you can contact me at my Enron number for the next couple of months otherwise at 713-592-9723.

Thxs
Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: Lisa Harris [mailto:harrislj@houston.rr.com]
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 7:09 PM
To: david.delainey@enron.com; dave.delainey@enron.com
Subject: Thanks

Dave,
Thanks for stopping by today.  I've enjoyed working with you.  You're an outstanding leader, and I don't say that lightly.  It's disappointing that we won't finish what we've started.  However, I'm confident this will work out for the best.

Below is my contact information.  If you can provide me with your contact information, I'd like to take you up on your offer to be a reference...I'll use it judiciously.

If you need someone down the road that is dedicated, capable and will get the job done, please keep me in mind.

Have a great holiday.

Regards,
Mike Harris

3921 Tennyson
Houston, TX 77005
(713) 667-8754

mharris4@houston.rr.com <mailto:mharris4@houston.rr.com>


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 01/08/2001
03:31 PM ---------------------------

Kathy Spradling <spradlin@rice.edu> on 01/08/2001 10:47:27 AM
To: (Recipient list suppressed)
cc:
Subject: Spring 2001 Module and Calendar Schedule Attached

Spring 2001 Faculty,

Attached is the Spring 2001 Module and Calendar Schedules for your
review.  Please note the Jones Graduate School is not following the
traditional University Calendar for Spring Break this year.  If you have
any questions please contact me.

Kathy

Kathy M. Spradling
MBA Program Coordinator
Jesse H. Jones Graduate School of Management
Rice University
6100 Main Street, MS 531
Houston, Texas  77005-1892
Phone:  (713) 348-3313
Fax:  (713) 348-5251
Email:  spradlin@rice.edu
http://www.rice.edu/jgs
E-mail:  spradlin@rice.edu
http://www.ruf.rice.edu/~jgs/
 - Spring Module 2001 Sch.doc
 - Spring Module 2001 Cal.doc


With apologies to Joe Carrico, please find attached the Annex 3 he would
like the group to consider.

 <<Annex 3 Amended-dr4.doc>>

 - Annex 3 Amended-dr4.doc


What do you think we should do?
----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 09/17/2000 12:16 PM -----

	RTellis@milbank.com
	09/05/2000 12:28 PM

		 To: Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Waste Management v. GSF/Ecogas

Richard, the court has set a trial date in the Waste Management case for Feb.
16, 2001 and plaintiff Waste Management has propunded form interrogatories on
Ecogas.? Pursuant to your instructions, we have not spent any time on the
case, however,? we will need to draft some discovery responses/objections and
discuss how to deal with the trial date as it gets closer.?? Thanks.

This e-mail message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee
or agent responsible for delivery of this message to the intended
recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail message is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify
the sender and delete this e-mail message from your computer.


Susan

As per our phone conversation, I am dropping you a note to explain why there was a decrease in the sales volumes for Canada
from the first to second quarter 2001.

There are two reasons for the decline in sales volumes:

	1.  Last year EOL offered a fixed rate product that produced minimal margins but a large volume of transactions.
	     It was decided that this product would not be offered in the year of 2001, but because there were winter deals
	     that continued through to March 2001, we did not see a decline in volumes until April 2001.

           2.   Enron Canada was involved in ligitation with NGX, with respect to their publication of the Aeco index.  ECC did
	     not have any confidence in the index because the EOL deals were not included in determining the Aeco monthly index
	     and we felt the index could easily be manipulated.  As a result, ECC was hesistant to enter into Aeco Monthly index
                 deals with counterparties thus reducing our volume of sales.

I hope this helps!

Cheryl


are you prepared to defend your answer?

"Eva Pao" <epao@mba2002.hbs.edu> on 05/13/2001 03:01:04 PM
Please respond to <epao@mba2002.hbs.edu>
To:	<John.Arnold@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:	2

-----Original Message-----
From: John.Arnold@enron.com [mailto:John.Arnold@enron.com]
Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2001 4:54 PM
To: epao@mba2002.hbs.edu
Subject: RE: Extra credit

and your offer?

"Eva Pao" <epao@mba2002.hbs.edu> on 05/13/2001 02:58:28 PM

Please respond to <epao@mba2002.hbs.edu>

To:   <John.Arnold@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:  RE: Extra credit

1.99999999999999999999999999999999999

-----Original Message-----
From: John.Arnold@enron.com [mailto:John.Arnold@enron.com]
Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2001 4:37 PM
To: epao@mba2002.hbs.edu
Subject: Re: Extra credit

rules to a game:
You flip a coin. If you get tails you win 0.  if you get heads, i give you
$1.  Keep flipping until you get a tails, at which point you walk away with
the money.  however, each heads you get after the first you double your
money.  So if you flip heads 3 times and then tails, you get $4.  What's
you bid/offer on playing this game?  (would you pay $.5 to play? $1? $2?
what you charge me play against you?)


Look forward to hearing from you.

Thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	DaveSegal@aol.com@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-DaveSegal+40aol+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Tuesday, August 28, 2001 12:16 AM
To:	Presto, Kevin M.
Subject:	Re: Custom Home

Hi Kevin.  I just got your email and tomorrow I will be at Enron Field for
the Astros game.  I try to be as flexible as possible for meetings and
usually try to schedule them in the evenings or on weekends; whatever is most
convenient for you.
I anticipate getting home late tomorrow nite and will call you Wednesday
evening if that is alright.
I look forward to meeting with you and working with you on your new home.
Thank you for your consideration.
David Segal
Custom Audio Video
281-491-1999


Jason,
 I forgot to tell you about the bridal shower on Sat. Reagan laughed about
your comment about singing in English class. She said to tell you "hi".
Jamie Kalmer and Reagan looked about the same but NOT Jeanne Hofbauer! She's
going to McKendree College and working at Good Ol'Days restaurant in New
Baden. She must be getting part of her wages in food! WHOA! Is she big!
Looks like she put on about 70 pounds. I almost didn't recognize her.
 Anyway, just thought I'd give you  the news.
Love, Mom


Dear Mike,

A lot of the needs listed in Tim's memo will also be needed in NY, but on a
smaller scale.  I'll put a resource requirement memo together by the end of
the week and then we can determine who would fit these requirements and where
these people should come from (London/Houston).

I think this project would be a great opportunity for some
analysts/associates (of course working under experienced personnel).

Regards

Shona

Mike Jordan@ECT
08/14/2000 02:56 AM
To: Tim Poullain-Patterson/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Richard Sage/LON/ECT@ECT, Fernley Dyson/LON/ECT@ECT, Andrew
Cornfield/LON/ECT@ECT, Shona Wilson/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: MG Integration : Resource Requirements

A good tee up - and one we should regularly reassess - here goes some initial
feedback which you should push back on :-

Valuation review - resource requirement to be defined in detail by Andy in
his new role - I think the offer from Eric of finding some Analysts and
Associates for the short term assessment may be the immediate answer.

Balance Sheet substantiation - at present I assess the power and gas
substantiation process as priority - although we should review the resources
coming free from Global ( Chris and Rashpal ) as they may not be easily
useable by Raewyn - Chris is free at present and Rashpal promised for
Thunderball. Whilst I am as concerned as you are we should reassess level of
risk because
AA would have done ( could do more ? ) some substantive / due diligence on
balance sheet
The trade accountants at MG had a simplistic entity structure based around an
infrastructure where the AS400 did both the DPR and account posting  - unlike
our own systems - so inherent risk is lower ( excluding inventory )
we must make certain our efforts are aligned to Fin Ops !

Inventory - interesting one this - it should be very accurately controlled
already ( it is the business ??? ) yet the problem is that it is not
transparent at the consolidation level. I would like you to get David Tregar
to assess the level of risk with you ( and discuss with me and Philip Lord
the current securitisation of inventory ) before we put an action plan in
place for this balance sheet category

Integration / Controls - you should continue your efforts to bring the MG
priority to the functional stripe leaders' agenda - after Friday's meeting
they know the effort required are that recruitment is key

SAP - we will look to Michael Heap on this ( but we did identify some key
business analysis work for Kevin Rhodes to be done ASAP - we should track
this )

Remote offices - continues to be the dog that has not barked ( YET ) -
Richard, you and I need to rethink where we are  - particularly with South
America

Overall - we both agree more resources are required but they have to be
scoped quite precisely !

Thanks for the note

Tim Poullain-Patterson
11/08/2000 18:59
To: Mike Jordan/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: MG Integration : Resource Requirements

Mike,

As you know we still have a very full issues list and we are spreading the
few resources we have on ground pretty thinly, leaving a residue of partially
completed tasks that will need to be revisited at some point. Also, though we
are leveraging MG staff where we can, we have already made an assessment that
their support infrastructure is very lean - this is being stretched to
breaking point by the RW acquisition and various Enron integration
initiatives, e.g. establishing functional teams.

At present we have the following resources on the ground:

We are continuing to identify issues that add to our assessment of
operational risk. If we are to reduce this risk to an acceptable level we
need to commit additional resources to the project.

I assess our current resource needs as follows:

Valuation Review : the valuation review that Andy and I performed prior to
"effective control" date identified a number of complex valuation issues that
require further quantitative analysis. Also, there is imbedded optionality in
a lot of the physical business transacted throughout MG which should be
modelled to determine the correct valuation and accounting treatment (and if
there is any extra value to be extracted - Eric Gadd has recently prioritised
this!). Requirement - risk manager with developed quantitative/modelling
skills.

Balance Sheet Substantiation : a comprehensive validation of balances
including a review of reconciliation's, evidence of account ownership
(detection of "88888"'s accounts etc...) is overdue. Requirement - lead
accountant plus two juniors.

Inventory : a lot more analysis is required of the global inventory balances
- see earlier note to Eric Gadd. Requirement - one/two risk manager(s).

General Integration : having now identified the functional leads for MG in
London,  we are now due to involve the "stripe leaders" in the process of
creating the functional groups, including identifying gaps in resourcing. I
will not prejudge the outcome beyond saying that each functional group will
need extra staff that I am expecting the "stripe leaders" to provide.
Requirement - to be determined by "stripe leaders".

SAP : ??? Requirement - to be determined by SAP project team.

Remote Offices : the above requests relate to the London office only. Having
identified Enron Controllers for the offices in the Far East I do not
envisage significant issues integrating those offices. However, I have
minimal understanding of what our requirements in the US and South America
are, and propose deferring that discussion to another time...

Regards,
Tim


Kevin,

Yes, I am available. Please send a resume to Shirley Crenshaw.
Shirley will call you to set up the time.

Vince

	From:  Kevin McGowan @ ENRON                           07/10/2000 09:28 AM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, George Hopley/HOU/ECT@ect
cc:
Subject: Interview Request

I am trying to schedule an interview with a gentleman who is currently a
professor at Rice.  We are interested in possibly hiring him in a research
capacity in the Coal and Emissions group.  Would you have time to interview
him tom'w?  Let me know if you can.

Thank you

Kevin McGowan x-3-7499


ThinkBank went live with a bang last Friday!  The Idea Vault already has more
than 20 innovative entries, and the eThink team has been busy routing these
ideas to the right people.

There are ideas about everything from new trading opportunities to hot air
balloons.  Visit the ThinkBank today.  Got an idea?  Make a deposit.  Need
some help?  Make a withdrawal.

eMeet has a brand-new look.  Have you seen it yet?  We took your feedback --
thanks for posting it right there in eMeet -- and created a more dynamic and
informative site for you.  Check it out.  Go to eMeet now!

Don't miss Cindy Olson's eSpeak this Thursday, November 3 at 10:00 am Houston
time.  Cindy, executive vice president of Human Resources & Community Affairs
will be answering your questions about the new Enron employee stock option
program.
And, if you can't make the live event (all together now), be sure to
pre-submit your question(s) on the eSpeak site!

You know you have the stuff to increase Enron's competitive advantage.  Put
it in the Edge today.


Please set up the following contract with ENA as agent for Columbia Energy
Marketing.

Pipeline CGAS
Contract 48049
Term  1/1/2000 - 1/31/2000 then evergreen
Firmness IT
Type  Inter Paper Pool
Rate Sched IPP

Pipeline CGAS
Contract 48050
Term  1/1/2000 - 1/31/2000 then evergreen
Firmness IT
Type  Aggregation Service
Rate Sched AS

Please set up the following contract with ENA as agent for Columbia Energy
Services

Pipeline CGAS
Contract 39999
Term  1/1/2000 - 1/31/2000 then evergreen
Firmness IT
Type  Aggregation Service
Rate Sched AS

Also, please check on deal 148659.

Thanks


Suzanne,

I was out last week, so I am just now getting back with you.  We primarliy
served the Texas Desk commercial team, with about 10% of time spent on
Producer Services.  The non routine activity should be allocated to the Texas
Desk.

D

	From:  Suzanne Nicholie @ ENRON                           10/10/2000 09:36 AM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: OPM Survey

Thanks for your spreadsheet.  One thing I still need from you is what
commercial teams your group was supporting overall ?  In addition, I noticed
you allocated 15 hours to the activity ES002 - Non Routine Trade Monitoring &
Reporting.  What commercial team(s) was this 15 hours spent supporting?

Thanks!
Suzanne

Daren J Farmer@ECT
10/06/2000 05:42 PM
To: James Scribner/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Suzanne Nicholie/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Shari
Mao/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: OPM Survey

I had problems in getting the newest version of Access.  So, please see the
attachement below related to the OPM Hours Survey.


Karen,

Here is the market wrap for this week. Please take a look at it and let me know.

thanks,
Monika


For those of you trying to keep track of the exhibit lists in this case, here
is the most recent update of the exhibit list for the Comprehensive
Settlement Agreement.? For those preparing rebuttal, please identify your
testimony as such for consistency purposes.? John Burkholder, who was
originally identified as filing exhibit 19, will not be filing rebuttal.?
Eric Nelson, who will be rebutting the testimony of Powerspring, will file as
exhibit 19.

FILED EXHIBITS
Exhibit 1?? Comprehensive Settlement Document??
Exhibit 2?? Lad Lorenz Testimony
Exhibit 3?? Eric Nelson Testimony
Exhibit 4?? Mark Pocta Testimony
Exhibit 5?? Tom Beach Testimony
Exhibit 6?? Jeff Dasovich Testimony
Exhibit 7?? Rick Counihan Testimony
Exhibit 8?? John Burkholder Testimony
Exhibit 9?? Paul Amirault Testimony
Exhibit 10? Jeanne Zaiontz Testimony
Exhibit 11? Paul McKelvey Testimony
Exhibit 12? Jeff Fawcett Testimony
Exhibit 13? Errata to Comprehensive Settlement Document

NEW EXHIBITS
Exhibit 14? Rebuttal Testimony of Lad Lorenz
Exhibit 15? Rebuttal Testimony of Jeff Dasovich
Exhibit 16? Rebuttal Testimony of Paul Amirault
Exhibit 17? Rebuttal Testimony of Jeff Fawcett
Exhibit 18? Rebuttal Testimony of Tom Beach
Exhibit 19? Rebuttal Testimony of Eric Nelson
Exhibit 20? Rebuttal Testimony of Rick Counihan


----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 06/26/2000 02:08 PM -----

	Monica Edwards
	06/26/2000 11:01 AM

		 To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Domingo Drakes/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Contact Info for Erica Hamilton

Erica can be reached at 703-491-8005, or  2606 Woodfern Court, Woodbridge, VA
22192.


Attached is a revised copy of the Separation Agreement and Release for Mary
Jane Brodsky.


Enron Seminar Series in FinanceJones Graduate School of Management, Rice
UniversityLuigi ZingalesUniversity of Chicagowill give a seminar at the Jones
School on Friday, April 27,? "The Great Reversals: The Politics of Financial
Development in the 20th Century."The seminar will begin at 3:30 in Room 105.A
pdf of the paper is available through the seminar website:
http://www.ruf.rice.edu/~jgsfss/.

Fu-Kuo Albert WangAssistant ProfessorJones Graduate School of Management --
MS 531? Rice University? 6100 Main Street? Houston, TX 77005? Phone:
713-348-5404? Fax:???? 713-348-5251email: wangfa@rice.eduhttp
://www.ruf.rice.edu/~wangfa/


looks good.
Rosie, you may want to include this in ken's file for the toronto trip

	Eric Thode
	03/16/2001 08:56 AM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Proposed Ad for the Ontario Market

I sent this to Rick Shapiro and Mark Palmer as well.  This is an ad created
for use in the Ontario market and would include the logos of the signatory
companies (rather than individual signatures).Aleck Dadson worked with GPC on
its creation.  It is part of the total plan, which includes Ken Lay's visit
to Toronto April 4 to meet with media and government leaders.

Give me your thoughts.

Eric

---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Thode/Corp/Enron on 03/16/2001 08:42
AM ---------------------------

"Jacob, Sasha" <SJacob@GPC.CA> on 03/15/2001 02:23:24 PM
To: "'eric.thode@enron.com'" <eric.thode@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Proposed Ad

Eric:

As requested by Aleck Dadson, please find attached a copy of an open letter
to the Premier of Ontario which we are proposing be placed as an ad in the
National Post and the Globe & Mail next week. It is our intention to have
the letter signed by a group of energy stakeholders including Enron,
TransAlta, ATCO, Toronto Hydro, Mississauga Hydro, Dynegy, The Toronto Board
of Trade, The Ontario Chamber of Commerce, the Independent Power Producers
Society of Ontario, etc.

 <<Open Letter.doc>>

Sasha Jacob
GPC International
sjacob@gpc.ca
Ph:  (416) 598-0055
Fx:  (416) 598-3811
www.gpcinternational.com

*******************************************************************
This email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper
for the presence of computer viruses

Ce courrier a fait l'objet d'un balayage antivirus au moyen
du logiciel MIMEsweeper
*******************************************************************

 - Open Letter.doc


======================================================

TR's State NewsWire

. . .daily intelligence on communications
industry news and policy from the editors
of Telecommunications Reports. . .

======================================================

*Table of Contents*
June 6, 2001

STATES
PENNSYLVANIA -- PUC conditionally supports Verizon interLATA bid
CONNECTICUT -- SNET challenges city's telecom certification
TENNESSEE -- BellSouth to ask TRA to support market-entry bid
soon
MICHIGAN -- PSC adopts '616' area code 'split'
NEW YORK -- Nassau County restricts use of wireless phones
WEST VIRGINIA -- Verizon to appeal $18M access-rate reduction
CALIFORNIA -- Wood proposes 'anticramming' rules
MISSOURI -- House passes rights-of-way bill
GEORGIA -- WorldCom says FX calls subject to 'recip comp'
CALIFORNIA -- ALJ suggests requiring Pacific Bell to permit
intraLATA toll presubscription
CALIFORNIA -- PUC extends deadline for Pacific Bell interLATA
filing
IOWA -- Board mulls revoking LTDS's certificate
NEBRASKA -- PSC to discuss implementing '511'
NEBRASKA -- PSC seeks copies of MDU contracts
CONNECTICUT -- DPUC expands Lifeline assistance in tribal areas
MICHIGAN -- Customers can bring complaints without counsel
OREGON -- Group criticizes AT&T price hike
MINNESOTA -- MP Telecom upgrades network
MASSACHUSETTS -- CTC activates Springfield fiber network
GEORGIA -- AGL networks to install fiber in Atlanta

______________________________________________________

PENNSYLVANIA -- PUC conditionally supports Verizon interLATA bid

The Public Utility Commission today lent its support to Verizon
Pennsylvania, Inc.'s application to provide in-region interLATA
(local access and transport area) services, subject to several
conditions to ensure market competition.  Today's decision
concludes a formal investigation that began when Verizon
requested the commission's support in January.  (1/9/01)

In a 3-2 vote, the PUC told Verizon that it must agree to a
permanent assurance plan with "self-executing" remedies based on
the New York model already accepted by the FCC and to increased
penalties for failure to meet performance standards.  Verizon
said that it will accept these conditions and that it plans to
file its interLATA bid with the FCC "shortly."

Commissioners Nora Mead Brownell and Terrance J. Fitzpatrick
dissented.  Commissioner Brownell said, "I cannot, in good
conscience, affirm that these markets are open as envisioned
under the [federal Telecommunications Act of 1996]."  Both
dissenting commissioners listed several areas in which Verizon
had failed to meet the FCC requirements to determine that local
markets are open to competition.

A WorldCom, Inc., spokesman told TR, "We agree with the
dissenters and hope the FCC will recognize that problems still
exist and force Verizon to fix them prior to allowing them to
offer long distance."

Once Verizon files its market-entry bid with the FCC, the PUC
will present its recommendation.  Section 271 of the Act requires
the FCC to consult with the U.S. Department of Justice and
relevant state regulators before ruling on such applications.
(Docket no. M-00001435, Consultative Report on Application of
Verizon Pennsylvania Inc., for FCC Authorization to Provide In-
Region, InterLATA Service in Pennsylvania)

______________________________________________________

CONNECTICUT -- SNET challenges city's telecom certification

Southern New England Telecommunications (SNET) has filed an
appeal in Superior Court (New Britain) challenging the Department
of Public Utility Control's decision to grant the city of Groton
a certificate to provide telecom access services.  (Docket no.
00-03-12)

SNET argues that Groton "is not legally empowered to offer
telecommunications services to those who are not inhabitants of
its electric service area" under Connecticut General Statutes 5
7-233i.  Groton's customers as defined in its application would
all be noninhabitants, SNET said.

In its April 11 decision, the DPUC agreed with Groton's argument
that "[the statute] has no language prohibiting a municipality
from offering wholesale telecommunications service."

______________________________________________________

TENNESSEE -- BellSouth to ask TRA to support market-entry bid
soon

BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc., has notified the Regulatory
Authority that it plans to request support for its bid to enter
the Tennessee interLATA (local access and transport area) market
"by the end of July."  Compliance with the 14-point "competitive
checklist" of section 271 of the federal Telecommunications Act
is a prerequisite for FCC authorization to provide in-region
interLATA service.  The FCC must consult with the U.S. Department
of Justice and relevant state regulators before ruling on the
applications.

BellSouth asked the TRA to schedule hearings on its application
for the first week of November.  BellSouth asked the TRA to
support its section 271 bid in 1997, but the company withdrew the
request before the TRA could decide whether to endorse it, a TRA
staff member told TR.

______________________________________________________

MICHIGAN -- PSC adopts '616' area code 'split'

The Public Service Commission yesterday approved a geographic
"split" to relieve number exhaustion in the "616" area code.

A north/south geographic split will be implemented with a
dividing line that follows the northern boundaries of Saugatuck,
Hamilton, Hopkins, Wayland, Middleville, Hastings, and Woodland
rate centers.  Customers in and to the south of these rate
centers will receive a new area code.  Customers to the north of
the rate centers will retain 616.

Permissive dialing will begin by July 13, 2002, and mandatory
dialing will begin Feb. 15, 2003.  Wireless carriers will have an
extended permissive dialing period through Feb. 15, 2004.  (Case
no. U-12850)

______________________________________________________

NEW YORK -- Nassau County restricts use of wireless phones

Nassau County today enacted an ordinance requiring the use of
hands-free devices when operating wireless phones while driving.
"Although mobile phones provide convenience for our busy lives,
their use must conform with the need for public safety," Nassau
County Executive Thomas Gulotta said.

Emergency calls to police, fire, ambulance, or health care
providers are exempt from the requirement.  The ordinance
authorizes the police department to fine up to $100 per
violation, a Nassau County spokesperson told TR.  The ordinance
takes effect July 1.

______________________________________________________

WEST VIRGINIA -- Verizon to appeal $18M access-rate reduction

Verizon West Virginia, Inc., yesterday said it plans to ask the
Public Service Commission to reconsider an order requiring
Verizon to reduce its access rates by $18 million over three
years.  The PSC's order addressed an AT&T Corp. complaint.  While
the reduction is smaller than the $27.6 million suggested by
AT&T, it's larger than the $6 million cut Verizon proposed.

Verizon said that, if given the chance, it would demonstrate that
the PSC was "misguided in seeking to mirror in-state and
interstate access rates."  The telco said the order gives AT&T
and other long distance companies a free ride on its network at
the expense of consumers.

The PSC ordered the access charge reductions to be passed through
to West Virginia toll customers.  Verizon responded, "People
shouldn't hold their breath waiting for AT&T to pass along any
savings."  (Case no. 00-0318-T-C, AT&T Communications of West
Virginia, Inc. v. Bell Atlantic-West Virginia, Inc.)

______________________________________________________

CALIFORNIA -- Wood proposes 'anticramming' rules

Public Utilities Commissioner Charles Wood has proposed rules to
regulate the inclusion of noncommunications charges on phone
bills.  Existing law, which authorizes only communications-
related charges on phone bills, is scheduled to expire July 1.
(1/5/01)  The proposed rules are designed to prevent "cramming,"
which is the placement of unauthorized charges on phone bills.

The proposed rules require telecom companies to obtain a
customer's written consent before including noncommunications
charges on phone bills.  Customers may revoke their consent at
any time without charge and may identify a dollar maximum per
charge and per billing cycle on noncommunications charges.
Telecom companies may not disconnect or threaten to disconnect
basic local phone service for nonpayment of noncommunications
charges.

Under the proposed rules, telecom companies must take
"reasonable" precautions to screen vendors and billing agents
before agreeing to provide noncommunications billing services for
them.  Noncommunications charges must be identified in a separate
section of phone bills.  Comments are due June 20.  (Rulemaking
00-02-004)

______________________________________________________

MISSOURI -- House passes rights-of-way bill

The House has passed a bill restricting local governments'
authority to regulate public rights-of-way.  The measure now goes
to Gov. Bob Holden (D.).  Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. and
competitive local exchange carriers support the bill, but the
Missouri Municipal League "fought the bill tooth and nail," a
league spokesperson told TR.

SB 369 would prohibit local governments from requiring telecom
companies to obtain a franchise to use rights-of-way but would
grandfather franchise agreements in effect May 1.  The bill would
prohibit rights-of-way rental fees but would authorize local
governments to impose rights-of-way permit fees, which would be
limited to "actual, substantiated costs reasonably incurred" in
managing the public rights-of-way.

Local governments would have to process rights-of-way permit
applications within 31 days after receiving a complete
application.  Telecom and cable TV companies would be authorized
to identify rights-of-way permit fees on customer bills.

______________________________________________________

GEORGIA -- WorldCom says FX calls subject to 'recip comp'

WorldCom, Inc., has asked the Public Service Commission to
determine that calls originated by BellSouth Telecommunications,
Inc.'s customers to competitive local exchange carriers' foreign-
exchange (FX) customers should be considered local and therefore
subject to reciprocal compensation.  Proper treatment of FX
traffic is required to meet item 13 (reciprocal compensation) of
section 271 of the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996's 14-
point "competitive checklist," MCI said.

Treating CLECs' FX traffic as long distance provides "significant
competitive advantages" to BellSouth because it permits BellSouth
to assess access charges on local calls and "shields BellSouth's
local FX service from competition," WorldCom said.  (Docket no.
6863-U)

______________________________________________________

CALIFORNIA -- ALJ suggests requiring Pacific Bell to permit
intraLATA toll presubscription

Administrative Law Judge Karen Jones has recommended that the
Public Utilities Commission require Pacific Bell to permit
MCImetro Access Transmission Services LLC's customers to
presubscribe to Pacific Bell's intraLATA (local access and
transport area) long distance service.  The recommendation was
made in a draft arbitrator's report about the companies'
interconnection agreement.

Pacific Bell said the requirement would be confusing to customers
and would require the company to identify a separate billing
channel or generate a bill solely for intraLATA long distance
service.

"It is blatantly discriminatory for Pacific to refuse to provide
intraLATA toll service to MCI's local service customers," Ms.
Jones said.  She said, "Pacific's arguments of 'customer
confusion' and 'billing' concerns do not have merit."  "Customers
could receive three different bills for the three different
services, and other carriers cope with billing for only one of
those three services.  There is no reason that Pacific should not
be able to provide a bill which includes only intraLATA
services."  Comments on the draft arbitrator's report are due
June 20.  (Application 01-01-010)

______________________________________________________

CALIFORNIA -- PUC extends deadline for Pacific Bell interLATA
filing

Public Utilities Commissioner Geoffrey Brown has extended Pacific
Bell's deadline for filing information demonstrating its
compliance with the interLATA (local access and transport area)
market-entry requirements of section 709.2 of California code.
The section requires the PUC to find that permitting Pacific Bell
to enter the California interLATA market doesn't harm the long
distance market substantially.  The commission also must find
that Pacific Bell's entry is based on fully open local exchange
access and that the company isn't engaging in anticompetitive
behavior or improper cross-subsidization.  (5/7/01)

Pacific Bell asked the PUC to extend the deadline from June 4
until "mid-June," when the company plans to file its section 271
application with the PUC.  Mr. Brown granted the company's
request and said he would establish a comment filing schedule
after Pacific has filed its section 709.2 assessment and section
271 application.  (Rulemaking nos. 93-04-003 and 95-04-043 and
Investigation nos. 93-04-002 and 95-04-044)

______________________________________________________

IOWA -- Board mulls revoking LTDS's certificate

The Utilities Board has ordered LTDS Corp. to demonstrate why its
operating certificate shouldn't be revoked.  The board is
concerned that "actions on the part of LTDS do not appear to be
the actions of a bona fide competitive local exchange carrier."

The board said there appears to be no voice traffic from or to an
LTDS customer in any exchange other than Fairfield.  The company
ordered and then cancelled orders for voice trunks in the Pella,
Chariton, and Centerville exchanges.  It ordered trunks in the
Grinnell and Sigourney exchanges, although it has no assigned
"NXX" codes there.  The company's tariff also fails to include a
residential rate.  It was deleted in a Jan. 19 tariff revision,
the board said.

It said state law obligates each local exchange utility to serve
all eligible customers within the utility's service territory,
unless explicitly excepted from the requirement by the board.
(Iowa Code section 476.29(5))

LTDS must file direct testimony by June 22.  Petitions to
intervene are due July 3.  Additional comments from the consumer
advocate and intervenors are due July 17.  Prepared rebuttal
testimony from LTDS will be due Aug. 3.  A hearing is scheduled
for Aug. 14.  (Docket no. TCU-01-13 - In Re: LTDS Corporation)

______________________________________________________

NEBRASKA -- PSC to discuss implementing '511'

The Public Service Commission has scheduled an Aug. 15 workshop
to address implementation of the "511" dialing code as an
Advanced Traveler Weather Information System (ATWIS).  It will
provide route-specific weather forecasts and road condition
reports to callers based on specific location information they
provide.

The PSC approved implementation of 511 for the ATWIS May 23.  The
commission directed the Department of Roads and the Nebraska
State Patrol to begin deploying the ATWIS.  (Application no. C-
2506/PI-48 - In the Matter of the Application of the Commission,
on its own motion, to seek comment on the establishment and
implementation of '511' as a statewide three-digit calling number
reserved for access to ATWIS)

______________________________________________________

NEBRASKA -- PSC seeks copies of MDU contracts

The Public Service Commission has requested by June 15 copies of
all contracts that all certified telecom carriers have entered
into with multiple dwelling units (MDUs).

In April 1999 the PSC issued an order clarifying its policy for
residential MDU access.  Qwest Corp. appealed the PSC's order to
the Nebraska Supreme Court, which affirmed a majority of it.  The
court remanded to the PSC the issue of whether the rates it set
for MDU access comply with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the
Eighth Circuit's (St. Louis) decision in Iowa Utilities Board v.
FCC (120 F. 3d 753).

After reviewing the case's testimony, the PSC said it's
"disturbed" that some telecom carriers still may be utilizing
contracts with MDUs that contain exclusive access and/or
exclusive marketing provisions "in apparent blatant disregard of
prior orders of this commission, as well as the FCC."  (Docket
no. C-2534/PI-50 - The Commission, on its own motion, to examine
the potential noncompliance with Commission orders entered in
Docket no. C-1878/PI-23)

______________________________________________________

CONNECTICUT -- DPUC expands Lifeline assistance in tribal areas

The Department of Public Utility Control has amended its Lifeline
plan to enhance assistance to individuals living on American
Indian tribal lands.  The measure adds language proposed by
Southern New England Telecommunications, which enhances
"subscribership and infrastructure deployment" within American
Indian communities by including a Lifeline credit of up to $30.25
per month and reducing Link Up service connection charges to
qualified applicants by $100.

The amendment follows an Oct. 5, 2000, FCC order to encourage
increased subscribership and infrastructure rollout in tribal
areas.  (Common Carrier docket 96-45)

______________________________________________________

MICHIGAN -- Customers can bring complaints without counsel

The Public Service Commission yesterday ruled that business and
residential telephone customers can bring "slamming" or
"cramming" complaints to the commission without the assistance of
an attorney.  The PSC's ruling involved a complaint filed by
Seaway Painting LLC against WorldCom, Inc., about a billing
dispute.

The PSC dismissed the complaint, as requested by the petitioner,
but concluded that Seaway may refile its complaint and proceed
"with the assistance of a person of its choice, who need not be a
licensed attorney."  The commission based its decision on a
provision of the Michigan Telecommunications Act, which provides,
"Hearings shall be conducted in a manner as to optimize
expediency, convenience, and the ability of end users to bring
and prosecute, without the assistance of counsel, complaints
alleging [slamming or cramming] while preserving the rights of
the parties."  (Case no. U-12863)

______________________________________________________

OREGON -- Group criticizes AT&T price hike

The Qwest Communications International, Inc.-backed Oregon
Coalition for Consumer Choice yesterday criticized AT&T Corp. for
its recent announcement of an 11% increase in consumer long
distance rates.  "This rate hike from AT&T just underscore the
importance of bringing real competition to the Oregon long
distance market," said Dan Lavey, coalition director.

The group said Qwest's entry into the Oregon interLATA (local
access and transport area) market would save a customer who made
only one 10-minute long distance call $2.80 per month, more than
$33 a year, over AT&T.

______________________________________________________

MINNESOTA -- MP Telecom upgrades network

MP Telecom, the telecom subsidiary of Minnesota Power, yesterday
announced that it has completed a major upgrade of its fiber
optic network with dense wavelength division multiplexing
technology.  The upgrade allows the company to increase greatly
data capacity serve to its customers in Minneapolis-St. Paul,
Duluth, St. Cloud, Brainerd, Grand Rapids, Hibbing, Virginia, and
Eveleth.

The company also has completed a 395-mile fiber optic network
connecting southern Minnesota to Minneapolis-St. Paul.  This
network ties in Rochester, Owatonna, Albert Lea, Austin, Winona,
and Red Wing.

______________________________________________________

MASSACHUSETTS -- CTC activates Springfield fiber network

CTC Communications has activated one of its four fiber networks
in western Massachusetts.  CTC PowerPath customers in Springfield
currently use the network, which was purchased from a variety of
dark fiber suppliers under a 20-year lease agreement and light up
by Cisco System, Inc., optronics.

The company said it will activate fiber access to its network in
over 60 locations throughout the New England and Mid Atlantic
states this year.

______________________________________________________

GEORGIA -- AGL networks to install fiber in Atlanta

AGL Networks LLC has started building a fiber network in Atlanta.
It will include 616 conduit miles in Atlanta's central business
district and the cities of Buckhead, Galleria, and Sandy Springs.
AGL Networks is a subsidiary of AGL Resources, Inc., an energy
services holding company that serves customers in Georgia,
Tennessee, and Virginia.

======================== END =========================

To view this issue online, go to http://www.tr.com/statenews/.

Federal law prohibits duplication in any form, including
electronic, without permission of the publisher.

TR's State NewsWire Copyright 2000, 2001 Telecommunications
Reports International, Inc.  (ISSN 1082-9350) is transmitted each
business day, except holidays.

Telecommunications Reports International, Inc.
1333 H St. NW, Suite 100-E
Washington, DC 20005-4707

Jennifer Erschen, E-mail: mailto:jerschen@tr.com
Editor

Gayle Kansagor, E-mail: mailto:gkansagor@tr.com
Associate Editor-Online Publications

Steve Arlowe,  E-mail: mailto:sarlowe@tr.com
Senior Research Analyst

Susan McGovern,  E-mail: mailto:smcgovern@tr.com
Senior Telecommunications Analyst

Victoria Curtis,  E-mail: mailto:vcurtis@tr.com
Senior Research Analyst

Account Services:
Eileen Callahan (202) 312-6116, (202) 312-6065 (fax), E-mail:
mailto:ecallahan@tr.com


(See attached file: HPLN0126.xls)

 - HPLN0126.xls


Meeting


Debbie is putting together a list of spreadsheets that these deals are coming
from.  In the meantime,  we will start combing through some of the
spreadsheets that we have.

Thanks


Anyone in the market for a $400 hammer?

Alan:

I'd like to use the info ( i.e., "we think the contracts are $XX billion out
of the money") in the context of the negotiations that I'm in and I'd also
like to tell Hertzberg---it will provide a powerful and compelling case to do
something about the contracts in order to 1) save the State's rear end and 2)
ensure that the core/noncore structure remains alive. I wouldn't hand out any
paper showing any analysis.  How long would it take to refine?

Best,
Jeff

	Alan Comnes/ENRON@enronXgate
	06/19/2001 07:01 PM

		 To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Jennifer Thome/NA/Enron@Enron, Ban
Sharma/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Tim Belden/ENRON@enronXgate
		 Subject: DWR Stranded costs: $21 billion

I pulled the recent forward curves (confidential; not for external release
without approval from West Power) and computed the stranded costs associated
with the DWR contracts.  Assuming SP15 on peak (which is conservative since
many of the contracts had off peak energy in them) the total overmarket is
$21 billion, or $13 billion discounted at 12%.  The former number is most
comparable to the $40+ billion DWR expenditure commitement number.

If we want to use this for any sort of external message I would like to
refine further.

Alan


---------------------- Forwarded by Ami Chokshi/Corp/Enron on 06/30/2000
10:02 AM ---------------------------

Royal_B_Edmondson@reliantenergy.com on 06/30/2000 09:52:41 AM
To: ami_Chokshi@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Intra day Midcon

(See attached file: HPL-June.xls)
 - HPL-June.xls


CALENDAR ENTRY:	INVITATION

Description:
	LUNCH WITH JENN!

Date:		5/25/2001
Time:		12:00 PM - 1:30 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Stacey W White

Detailed Description:


Transfer.  Section 7 is hereby amended by adding the following Subsection (c):
 "(c)  Party A may transfer its rights and obligations under this Agreement,
in whole but not in part, to any Affiliate so long as the obligations of such
Affiliate are guaranteed by Enron Corp. pursuant to a guaranty substantially
similar to the one provided on behalf of Party A, provided that such transfer
will not give rise to a Termination Event or an Event of Default."

Rod and I will follow up on the Letter of Credit issues.  Have a nice
weekend.  Regards.  Sara


Fair Shares?
Why Company Stock
Is a Burden for Many --
And Less So for a Few
---
Workers Often Must ...

  In the 1990s, as the stock market climbed year after year, many
corporations and their employees entered into a marriage of convenience:
The company would dole out its own shares as compensation and benefits.
Employees would have a steadily appreciating ...

Published by: The Wall Street Journal
Date: 11/27/2001
Word Count: 2637
Relevance Score on Scale of 100: 100
Folder Name: Enron Corp.

Full-text article available at
http://nrstg1p.djnr.com/cgi-bin/NewsRetrieval?cgi=WEB_ST_WC_STORY&DBNAME=WSJ&HDAN=J0133100035&Search=Enron%20Corp.%3A0000001529&QID=1529&QT=S&HDSC=J

Articles are included at no charge for flat-fee corporate customers. (Under standard pricing, charges apply.  For details, click the $ icon on the Dow Jones Interactive home page, located at http://www.djinteractive.com.)
______________________________________________________________________

To review or revise your folder, visit http://www.djinteractive.com or contact Dow Jones Customer Service by e-mail at custom.news@bis.dowjones.com or by phone at 800-369-7466. (Outside the U.S. and Canada, call 609-452-1511 or contact your local sales representative.)
______________________________________________________________________
Copyright (c) 2001 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved


Dear Mr Kean,

I am writing to you following a suggestion from Edith Terry (in Enron's DC
office) that I introduce myself to you with respect to prospective
employment with Enron. I will be permanently relocating to the United States
just prior to my marriage in Michigan this July and am looking to continue
my career in the energy sector. In particular, I have a strong interest in
the energy revolution taking place in the US, both on the commercial and
regulatory side and I would enjoy working for organisations, such as Enron,
that are leading this revolution. Edith suggested that you may be in a good
position to suggest opportunities within Enron for which I may be suitable.

I am currently based in Tokyo as the Australian energy representative to the
Asia Pacific Energy Research Centre (APERC), where I have developed a strong
knowledge of the Asia Pacific energy market. In this position I have been
closely involved in the development of the APEC Energy Demand and Supply
Outlook, as well as ongoing research in the fields of energy efficiency,
natural gas development and energy pricing. Moreover, as part of my work
with APERC I have maintained a close contact with APEC Energy Working Group
activities, including the APEC Energy Business Network.

Prior to my appointment at APERC, I worked at the Australian Bureau of
Agricultural and Resource Economics (ABARE) in Canberra. During my term at
ABARE, I was closely involved in the development of the economic research
underlying Australia's position for the Kyoto climate change conference, and
also in the analysis of APEC (Asia Pacific) energy markets.

For you information, I have enclosed a brief resume which summarises my
background qualifications and experience.
Knowing that you have a busy schedule I would be most grateful for any
advice or assistance you are able to offer.

Yours sincerely,

Alastair L. Stevenson
Energy Economist (Australia)
Asia Pacific Energy Research Centre (APERC)

encl.

 - Alastair Stevenson Resume.PDF


Hi All,

Attached is the OPM Monthly Hours Survey for November.  I need this returned to me no later than this Friday, November 30 at 12 noon.

Please do the following:

1.)  Please click on your region's / cost center's tab in the attached spreadsheet and enter the appropriate percentages
     of time that you and your employees spend on each of the tasks listed in the spreadsheet.

2.) Please verify that the Charge Allocations listed in the spreadsheet are correct and that the correct percentages are allocated to each of the trading desks.

3.)  Please note that the percentages currently in the spreadsheet are from last month.  Please change any of these numbers as is appropriate to reflect October's activities.

4.) Please make any other changes that may be needed regarding employees, titles, etc.

Please note that the spreadsheet is located on   O:/logistics/management/time allocation/OPM November Totals

Thank you so much for your cooperation in this matter.  If you have any questions, please let me know.

Thanks,

	      Elizabeth
	      x51694


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 02/23/2001 11:44 AM -----

	Tana Jones
	02/13/2001 09:19 AM

		 To: Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matthew Dawson/LON/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: BNP Paribas Guaranty

Attached is my proposed form of Guaranty to cover the US & UK business with
Paribas.  Tanya, please note, per our discussion I have increased the
guaranty amount to $50mm.  We have also added ECTRL to the Guaranty.

Please let me know if it meets with your approval and I will forward it to
Paribas in NY.


Julia sent me a copy of your memo following up on one of the questions asked
at the session earlier this week.  I would like to ask a follow-up question:

Do we lose the benefit of the special treatment under the bankruptcy code
when we enter into cross-product (i.e. physical and financial products)
netting and joint credit support arrangements.  If we agree with a
counterparty to net all of our trading exposures under multiple agreements
(swap agreements and gas, power, steel, coal, etc. trading agreements) to
determine how much credit support should be posted and then only ask for a
single LC that supports the whole shebang, do we lose this protection since
arguably we are no longer just "under a swap agreement?"


No intra-day changes for 9/29

Only BG&E (5 dth decrease) and NJN (2 dth decrease) change for 9/30

David


I attach a presentation nicely prepared mostly by Akshay Singh and the
Telecommunications portion by B.A.N. Sharma.  This contains general
information on India that you may find useful.  Please distribute this on to
others who may have use for the information.  I apologize for the size of the
file.


fyi
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 03/26/2001 10:23 AM -----

	Kim Frumkin@EES
	03/26/2001 09:30 AM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: thank you

Steve,

Thank you for participating, once again, in the video for deal central. The
videos are created, housed and maintained in Beth Tilney's area.
I mentioned to Beth that Corporate may have an interest in sharing/utilizing
the EES video equipment and expertise. Robert Pearson (our in-house film
expert) has a masters in video programming, taping, etc. And the good
news....within the next few weeks, the editing equipment will be fully up and
running.
Once installed and operational, all in-house produced videos will have the
look and feel of those created by outside vendors.

Please feel free to contact Beth (ext. 3.5022) if you have an interest in
exploring this concept.

And thank you again for your participation.

Best-Kim


Please mark your calendar for the upcoming "ENA Gas Assets Meeting" with
Cliff Baxter and Greg Whalley.

 Date: March 2, 2000

 Place: EB 5c2

 Time: 3:00 p.m.


ok, cool

Fletch


thanks Ben - makes sense.


I think we need to be careful about broadcasting every rumor floating around
to an email list of this size.  Just a thought.

	Mary Hain@ECT
	12/14/2000 02:51 PM

		 To: Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, James
D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe Hartsoe@Enron, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Richard Shapiro
		 cc: Tracy Ngo/PDX/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Rumor about PG&E

Please confirm or deny - rumor has it PG&E has or is filing for bankruptcy


what is an 82/82% percent deal?


Please plan to attend a meeting tomorrow, March 14 at 9 am CST in eb 749a.
Thanks Xochitl Velasco


Here it is:

Please let me know if you have any problems with this document.

Kay

John_Mable@dom.com on 08/21/2000 09:47:35 AM
To: kay.mann@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Edgecombe

Kay,

We are trying to turn around another draft with our comments by the end of the
day today.  However, we need a clean copy of Enron's 8/15/00 draft.  Please
send
one to my attention.

Thanks

John


Dear Richard Shapiro,

Thank you for shopping with 1-800-FLOWERS.COM.

The gift you selected  Sentimental Surprisev, will be delivered to June on
05/12/01 as you requested. However, to ensure that all gifts are delivered on
time for Mother's Day, we are asking that you please be flexible in the
delivery of your gift. Your gift may be delivered on May 11th, May 12th or
May 13th, as indicated when placing your order.  Your gift is guaranteed for
delivery by May 13, 2001.

Below is a summary of your order :

Recipient :
June Shapiro at:
7959 South Buchanan Way
Aurora, CO 80016

Order Summary :
Order number is 740701901.
Product : Sentimental Surprisev :    44.99
Service Charge        :    7.99
Tax(where applicable) :    0.00
Total Charge          :   52.98
Special Instructions  :Fri/Sat/Sun Acceptable

If you have any questions, please feel free to e-mail us at
customerservice@1800flowers.com, visit our online Customer Service Chat, or
call our Customer Service Department toll-free at 1-800-468-1141.

Sincerely,

Meredith McArdle
Director of Customer Service
1-800-FLOWERS.COM

Mother's Day is May 13th. Maybe your sister just had a baby and this is her
first Mother's Day.  Maybe you have a special relationship with an aunt, a
grandmother, even a mother-in-law.  Click here to view our selection of great
Mother's Day gifts!

http://www.1800flowers.com/cgi-bin/800f/collection.pl/psmg/10/0/0/0/0/0


Sorry to keep bugging you.  I think this deal is in as the wrong TransAlta.

Thanks!
Melissa


PRC Meetings begin on Monday, November 20th.  If you have not already done
so, please go in to PEP at http://pep.corp.enron.com and complete the
requests for feedback on the employees listed below.

If you have any questions, please call the PEP Help Desk at:

Houston:  1-713-853-4777, Option 4
London:  44-207-783-4040, Option 4
E-mail:  perfmgmt@enron.com

Thank you for your participation.

    ABRAMS, CLEMENT O
    BAILEY, SUSAN S
    BOYD, SAMANTHA
    BRUCE, ROBERT
    COOK, MARY H
    FREELAND, CLINT C
    GARCIA, JORGE A
    MURPHY, MELISSA A
    PANUS, STEPHANIE
    ST. CLAIR, CAROL L


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Espinoza, Veronica
Sent:	Monday, November 12, 2001 9:12 AM
To:	Anderson, Diane; Bailey, Derek; Baumbach, David; Bell, Jean; Boulanger, Patricia; Brown, Angela Y.; Cisneros, Celeste; Crawford, Sharon; Deming, Richard; Dickson, Melia; Giron, Darron C.; Gossett, Jeffrey C.; Guillen, Andrea R.; Hunter, Larry Joe; Keiser, Kam; Love, Phillip M.; McLaughlin Jr., Errol; Mendoza, Nidia; Moran, Tom; Moscoso, Mirna; Mulvany, Patrick; Negrete, Flavia; Ornelas, Bianca; Osire, Ann; Otto, Randy; Pernul, Sarah; Reeves, Leslie; Rohauer, Tanya; Seib, Dianne; Sietzema, Linda; Theriot, Kim S.; Wallumrod, Ellen; Wilder, Wesley
Subject:	Credit Report-11/12/01


A proposed Technical Corner Article on the work we did fitting the New York
area gas load data is attached for comment.

Bob Lee


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
W E E K E N D   S Y S T E M S   A V A I L A B I L I T Y

F O R

December 14, 2001 5:00pm through December 17, 2001 12:00am
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SCHEDULED SYSTEM OUTAGES:

ARDMORE DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS:   No Scheduled Outages.

AZURIX: No Scheduled Outages.

EB34 DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

EDI: No Scheduled Outages.

EES:  No Scheduled Outages.

ENRON CENTER SOUTH DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS:   No Scheduled Outages.

ENRON NORTH AMERICAN LANS:

Impact:   ENS
Time:   Fri 12/14/2001 10:00:00 PM CT thru Fri 12/14/2001 11:00:00 PM CT
	Fri 12/14/2001 8:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 12/14/2001 9:00:00 PM PT
	Sat 12/15/2001 4:00:00 AM London thru Sat 12/15/2001 5:00:00 AM London
Outage:   Clean up routing
Environments Impacted:   ENS
Purpose:    Optimize routing
Backout:   enable vlan 7 on ecn-34-trd-dcr1/2
Contact(s):   Shishido, Scott 713-853-9780

FIELD SERVICES:  No Scheduled Outages.

INTERNET: No Scheduled Outages.

MESSAGING: No Scheduled Outages.

MARKET DATA: No Scheduled Outages.

NT: No Scheduled Outages.

OS/2:  No Scheduled Outages.

OTHER SYSTEMS: No Scheduled Outages.

SITARA:  No Scheduled Outages.

SUN/OSS SYSTEM: No Scheduled Outages.

TELEPHONY:  No Scheduled Outages.

TERMINAL SERVER:  No Scheduled Outages.

UNIFY:  No Scheduled Outages.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
								FOR ASSISTANCE

(713) 853-1411   Enron Resolution Center

Specific Help:
Information Risk Management			(713) 853-5536
SAP/ISC                                                                               (713) 345-4727
Unify On-Call 					(713) 284-3757  [Pager]
Sitara On-Call					(713) 288-0101  [Pager]
RUS/GOPS/GeoTools/APRS			(713) 639-9726  [Pager]
OSS/UA4/TARP				(713) 285-3165  [Pager]
CPR						(713) 284-4175  [Pager]
EDI Support 					(713) 327-3893  [Pager]
EES Help Desk					(713)853-9797 OR (888)853-9797
TDS -Trader Decision Support On-Call                    (713) 327-6032 [Pager]


To all concerned:

Here is a revised EOL/Kiodex Co-Marketing Agreement updated to reflect the discussions that occurred with Kiodex last week and Andy Zipper's follow on comments.  I believe both EnronOnline and Kiodex have agreed to all of the key commercial and technical terms presented.  The Enron legal department expects to be able to use this document as a basis for the drafting of a formal Co-Marketing Agreement.

In addition, I intend to forward this document on to Kiodex this afternoon so please let me know if you have any final questions, comments, or additions.  Thank you.

Drew
x56075


Yes they are two totally different electronic trading systems.

   Kate Symes @ ECT                03/13/2001 04:43 PM

To: Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: 3/13 Checkout Con't

This deal was done on the Intercontinental Exchange (ICE). Jeff thought it
was the same thing as Dynegy Direct. I've changed it to ICE as broker, but
I'm wondering if these are different brokers, or why Jeff would have thought
they were the same....???

Kate

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
03/13/2001 02:31 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: 3/13 Checkout Con't

deal 548465
Jeff Richter

Is Dynegy Direct the correct broker because I do not see this deal on their
web checkout?