PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL
ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGE

DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT

Harvey Morris Esq.
California Public Utilities Commission
505 Public Utilities Commission
San Francisco, California   94102

  Re:   I.00-08-002  Subpoenas Served on Enron Power
Marketing, Inc. ("EPMI"), Enron Energy Services Operations Inc. and Enron
Energy Services Inc. (collectively referred to as "EES"), Enron Energy
Marketing Corporation ("EEMC"), and Portland General Electric Corporation
("Portland General")(collectively sometimes referred to as the "Enron
Entities")

Harvey,

 Here are our proposals with respect to the Enron Entities'
production of documents pursuant to the above described subpoenas issued by
the California Public Utility Commission (hereinafter "the Commission").
The Enron Entities are willing to assist the Commission in undertaking its
investigation into the problems in the California electric markets by
producing the information specified on a timely basis.  We believe that the
limited production we propose will enable the Commission to commence its
investigation much sooner than if the parties were forced to litigate all of
the potential objections to the requests for production, which are, by any
standard, extremely broad and could involve millions of pages of documents.
We make these proposals pursuant to our email exchange of October 3, 2000
with the understanding that the Commission agrees that by cooperating,
offering to produce or producing documents, the Enron Entities have not
waived any objections or challenges to these subpoenas whatsoever and that
any claims, defenses, objections, jurisdictional or otherwise or other
responses have been specifically reserved and can be raised in the future,
if necessary.   For all of these proposals, we exclude documents that are
protected from disclosure by the attorney client and attorney work product
privileges.

 Generally speaking, the Enron Entities propose to produce documents
for year 2000 as noted below.  We also understand that the Commission will
be obtaining documents from the ISO and PX and we will not attempt here to
duplicate documents that we understand will be produced by those entities.
As you will see in the general documents that are offered here for
production, Enron Energy Services Operations, Inc. is the parent of Enron
Energy Services, Inc. and does not have operating authority or engage in
wholesale or retail purchases or sales of energy.  Thus, the documents
offered here with respect to those two entities originates with Enron Energy
Services, Inc. but we have designated them both as EES.  We also do not
propose to offer duplicative documents as between the Enron Entities.

GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Requests 1 through 4

 Because of the dynamic nature of the Enron Entities' businesses, the
burden and expense on them to locate, and produce every corporate
organizational chart anywhere in their organizations since April 1, 1998 is
significant.   The Enron Entities will provide the Commission with exemplars
of their current organizational charts, telephone directories and so called
"family trees" to show its current organization.  To the extent that the
Enron Entities can readily identify and locate exemplars of significant
organizational charts, telephone directories or so called "family trees" for
earlier periods they will also make those available.  One Enron Entity,
Portland General, has published books on its corporate history.  If a list
of those books would be helpful, we can provide it.  With respect to the
other Enron Entities, to the extent that corporate histories can be found,
they will be produced.  We anticipate producing these documents in the first
wave on October 13, 2000.

Requests 5 and 6

 The Enron Entities propose that their responses to Requests 1-4 will
identify their relationship to affiliated companies and the Transaction
Documents will identify its customers and suppliers.  We believe this
information will be sufficient to illustrate these relationships for the
staff's purposes.

FINANCIAL DOCUMENTS
Requests 7 through 11

 The Enron Entities will produce their public filings for the period
requested with respect to financial data.  EPMI, EES, and Portland General
will provide to the Commission electronic transaction data ( the
"Transaction Documents") for the purchase and sale of energy delivered which
information includes economic data.   We anticipate producing public filings
regarding financial data on October 13, 2000 and the electronic Transaction
Documents in the second wave of document productions.

GENERATING DOCUMENTS
Requests 12, 14 and 18

 For the Enron Entities other than Portland General, the generation
facilities are either non-existent or limited in number and there will
probably be limited documents available.  The Enron Entities to the extent
they act as a scheduling coordinator or possessed the right to use or resell
generation output, do not have the specific documents that pertain to each
generation unit requested.  The Enron Entities, other than Portland General,
do have documents and information for Las Vegas Cogeneration.  We propose to
produce these documents in the second wave of document productions.

  For Portland General, the production of the requested documents
would involve a tremendous volume of documents, as Portland General owned
twenty generating facilities of a variety of types and sizes during 2000.
Portland General is a net importer of energy and can only generate about one
half of its total energy demand.  As a result, we question whether the
effort required of Portland General is warranted as its impact on the
California wholesale market is necessarily limited.  In addition, those
transactions which do involve Portland General sales into California are
limited to sales to the ISO and PX, and long term contracts with two small
California municipal utilities.  Thus, the Commission will receive the
essential transactional information regarding these sales from the ISO and
PX.  Nevertheless, Portland General proposes to provide for year 2000
electronic Transaction Documents in summary form similar to the data being
provided by other Enron Entities, to the extent relevant as discussed below.
We propose that the Commission defer requesting production of other
information until it has reviewed the information of generators who sell a
significant proportion of their energy into the California market.  At that
time a more accurate assessment can be made of whether this enormous effort
will be valuable given the limited impact of Portland General generation on
the California wholesale market.

TRANSACTION DOCUMENTS
Requests 13, 15, 16, 17 and 19

 We understand that the Commission will be obtaining trading data for
the purchase and sale of energy delivered in California from the ISO and PX.
EPMI can provide the Commission several different sets of relevant
transaction data for year 2000 (in California and outside of California and
Real Time) for the purchase and sale of energy delivered with the date,
counterparty, quantity, delivery point, hours, price, and whether it is a
purchase or a sale.   Because of the speed with which you want this
information, it is possible that some entries will be incomplete or
inaccurate.  For those
transactions where EPMI served only as the scheduling coordinator, we
understand that the ISO will show part of the transaction, but there will
not be a corresponding transaction in the EPMI data we can provide quickly.
The reason is that this type of transaction is passed through to EPMI's
customer on an accounting system rather than as part of the trading
business.  EES can also provide similar data with respect to relevant
wholesale and retail transactions with the proviso that with respect to
retail transactions it will not include the specific names of its retail
customers but instead will provide a blind customer number due to EES'
confidentiality obligations to those customers.  We anticipate producing the
Transaction Documents in the second wave of document productions.

FERC DOCUMENTS

Request 20

 The Enron Entities will produce the requests for data they received
from FERC and to the extent that FERC has been given responses, copies of
those responses.  We anticipate producing the FERC documents on October 13,
2000.

 Based upon discussions that we have had with the various Enron
Entities, we believe that we could make a second wave of productions on
Friday October 27, 2000.  It is possible that not all Enron Entities could
make that date but we believe the bulk of the data could be available for
production by then.

 We propose to make these productions with the understanding that if
any entity obtains a more stringent protective order than the one currently
in place, that all of the Enron Entities document productions will be
protected by the most stringent protective order.  In addition, if, at the
request of any party or nonparty to this proceeding, the Commission or a
court of competent jurisdiction orders that the requests for production be
limited, reduced or eliminated, the Enron Entities reserve the right to
limit the production of documents in conformance with such order.

 We understand that you will consider these proposals and let us know
if they are acceptable to the Commission.  If you have any questions or
comments about our proposal, please do not hesitate to contact Michael Day
or myself.

Brobeck Phleger & Harrison LLP

Gary Fergus

=======================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of
the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to
postmaster@brobeck.com
BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP
http://www.brobeck.com


Dortha,

This date works for me.

Vince

	Dortha Gray @ ENRON
	10/17/2000 03:14 PM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin Kindall/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cassandra
Schultz/NA/Enron@Enron, Gary Peng/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Gregory
Adams/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mike Deville/HOU/ECT@ECT, Johnna
Kokenge/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jan Johnson/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Research Group Project Meeting

This meeting originally scheduled for Thursday, October 19, at 10:00 has been
rescheduled to Thursday, October 26, at 10:00 in EB 19 C-1.  Please let me
know if this works with your schedule.


I saw your e-mail response.  Did it go to Oxley too?
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 05/24/2001
02:07 PM ---------------------------
From: David W Delainey@EES on 05/24/2001 01:26 PM
Sent by: Kay Chapman@EES
To: David W Delainey/HOU/EES, Philippe A Bibi/HOU/ECT, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT,
Raymond Bowen/HOU/ECT, Michael R Brown/LON/ECT@ECT, Rick
Buy/Enron@EnronXGate, Wes Colwell/Enron@EnronXGate, David Cox/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Janet R Dietrich/HOU/EES@EES, W David
Duran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim Fallon/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Ben
Glisan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Gold/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, James
A Hughes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael
Kopper/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron, Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Jeffrey
McMahon/Enron@EnronXGate, Rob Milnthorp/CAL/ECT@ECT, Matthew
Scrimshaw/LON/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Kenneth Lay/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cliff Baxter/HOU/ECT, James
Derrick/Corp/Enron, Ken Rice/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stanley
Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jeff Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Richard
Causey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Hannon/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Andrew S Fastow/HOU/ECT, Mark Frevert/NA/Enron, Lou L
Pai/HOU/EES@EES, David Oxley/HOU/ECT, Drew C Lynch/LON/ECT@ECT, Robert W
Jones/Enron@EnronXGate, Mary Joyce/Enron@EnronXGate, Marla Barnard/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Kalen Pieper/HOU/EES@EES, Gary P
Smith/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Cindy Skinner/HOU/ECT, Andrea Yowman/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Cindy Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Gina Corteselli/Corp/Enron, Elspeth
Inglis/Corp/Enron

Subject: Peer Group Mapping

On May 10, 2001, a memo was sent out regarding "Peer Group Mapping".  This
mapping is intended to illustrate from a functional view point where each
activity was placed at Year End 2000 VP PRC.

Please refer to the attached original memo, if you have not responded to
David Oxley and have any comments
please respond to him by May 25, 2001.

Dave Delainey

Following my note last week please find attached the consolidated peer group
mapping for all business units. This mapping is intended to illustrate from a
functional view point where each activity was placed at Year End 2000 VP PRC.

We were considering moving to a 3 Peer Group Structure however it as agreed
at the last PRC Committee Meeting  to stay with the current structure since
the data had been cleaned and everyone felt generally comfortable where most
activities had been placed with the exception of just  2 or 3. It was agreed
that we should concentrate on resolving these rather than undertaking an
organization wide remapping excercise to consolidate to 3 Peer Groups. All
functions/activities within the business units should now be reflected on the
acttached.

The actions points from this excercise are:

1 to review and agree the attached mapping

2    consider and comment on highlighted groups that we have discussed in
previous PRC meetings and ask for your comments or objections to moving them
as indicated on the attachment.

3 invite your comments or questions on any other function that you consider
questionable or requiring further explanation.

      Please return your comments to David Oxley by Friday May 25.

      To have this discussion now will save lengthy discussions in the final
VP/MD PRC Meetings.  Definitions of the peer groups are also attached for
your ease of
      reference.


On May 1st, iBuyit Payables was activated for all organizations supported by
Houston Accounts Payable Processing Center.  Since this transition, over 3000
invoices have been successfully processed by this on-line tool.  This is an
exciting step towards transitioning all of Enron to the on-line processing of
invoices.

Despite this initial success, I want to take this opportunity to address some
of the concerns that we have been hearing about this new tool and the
processing center.

I sent an invoice to Accounts Payable a while ago, but the vendor still has
not been paid.
The goal of the Accounts Payable Processing Center is to route the invoice
through iBuyit Payables for coding and approval within 4 business days of
receipt of the invoice by Accounts Payable.  As with the introduction of any
new process, Accounts Payable is experiencing transition issues and this
process time is currently 8 to 10 business days.  Accounts Payable is working
very hard to overcome these issues, and expects to achieve the normal
processing time of 4 business days within the next 9 business days.

When I call the Accounts Payable Call Center, they are unable to locate my
invoice.
This again is a result of the current backlog.  Between the time that the
Accounts Payable Processing Center receives an invoice, and the time that the
invoice is scanned and entered into iBuyit Payable, it is very difficult to
locate that invoice.  Once normal processing time is achieved, this
&blackout8 period will be no more than 4 business days.  In the meantime, it
is critical that invoices are not resubmitted until you are certain that they
have not been received by Accounts Payable.

What can I do to help process my invoices in a more timely manner?
Vendors should submit invoices directly to the Accounts Payable Processing
Center (PO Box 4734, Houston, TX 77210-4734, ATTN:  Enron AP) and should
indicate the company number and name, contact name, and coder,s EID.
Currently:

*   90% of invoices are received outside of the Accounts Payable Processing
Center
*   On average, invoices received by Accounts Payable are already 37 days
past due
*   On average, 40% of invoices received by Accounts Payable do not have the
correct company number

Submitting invoices directly to Accounts Payable with this information will
dramatically increase the speed and accuracy of processing.

Providing you with efficient, accurate, and friendly service is very
important to us.  We appreciate your patience as we work to achieve normal
processing levels of service.  More importantly, we look forward to working
with you on future enhancements that will enable iBuyit Payables to play a
valuable role in your invoice payment activities.

For invoice payment status please call the AP Call Center at (713) 853-7127
or toll free  (866) AP ENRON, or send an e-mail to
<mailto:iBuyit.payables@enron.com>.

If you have additional questions regarding Accounts Payable, please contact
Judy Knepshield.

Thank you,

Bob Butts


Samuel,

Please set up Kate Symes as a trader with access to all of the West power
desks.    She is taking over for Carla Hoffman as a Deal Control specialist.
She frequently has to enter California deals (PX,  ISO,  etc) in addition to
bilateral transaction deal entry.

If you have questions,  please give me a call.

Thanks,
JMF


I created #454057 for the flow at Mtr 5192.  Canny Conner is looking into mtr
6387.  I will let you know when he determines what we will be doing.

D

Aimee Lannou   10/26/2000 10:01 AM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: meter 6387 & 5192

Daren - There is flow at meters 6387 & 5192 for Oct. without a nom.

   Deal  contract  Last month of activity Counterparty

 Meter 6387 133179  HPL 215 Sept. 00  Duke Energy Trading

 Meter 5192 269123  ENA 201 Nov. 99   Duke Energy Trading

Thanks.

AL


Any news
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


As per our discussion yesterday, please find below some information on our
past discussions with i2, our current status and our suggested course of
action for your call with i2.  If you have any questions, please contact me
at extension 36635 or my assistant is Tina Spiller at 35746.

Thanks.

Greg Piper

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Shelby, Rex
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 8:56 AM
To: Piper, Greg
Cc: Shelby, Rex
Subject: EnronOnline Opportunity with i2

As background for Mr. Lay's call to Sanjiv Sidhu of i2 concerning the
EnronOnline opportunity, here is a brief summary of where we stand and our
suggestions:

History of Enron/i2 Discussions

? i2 was one the initial companies contacted by Enron Net Works (ENW) for the
EnronOnline commercial discussion.
? The focus of the Enron/i2 discussion earlier this year was a complete sale
of the software asset that drives EnronOnline to i2.
? i2 expressed considerable interest in the opportunity below the executive
level, but ENW had difficulty getting a concrete bid or proposal from i2.
? In order to get the discussion started, ENW provided an offer to i2.
? i2's response to the Enron offer was that they considered it high and that
they would prefer to partner with Enron in some manner in addition to some
form of purchase.
? ENW expressed interest in talking with i2 about this and requested that
they outline their preferred deal to Enron.
? ENW never received a term sheet or other information on a new price and
partnering concept from i2.

Current Status of EnronOnline Commercial Initiative

? Since those early discussions with i2, ENW has discussed the EnronOnline
opportunity with other selected technology companies, and is now considering
bids from several potential counterparties.
? Generally speaking the deal structure that appears to provide the best
opportunity for both parties entails involvement by ENW after the
transaction, in the form of equity participation or royalty payments or both,
as well as the transfer of some Enron people.
? This seems to move us into the realm of a "partnership" structure that
could fit the initial i2 interest.

Current Enron/i2 Status

? Rex Shelby talked briefly with Greg Brady, i2 CEO, at a conference in NYC
two weeks ago.
? Greg Brady expressed interest in renewing talks around the EnronOnline
opportunity.

Current Status of the Sale Opportunity

? We are now reaching the point in the process at which we need to determine
whether there is an interest from i2.
? We want to make sure we give i2 the opportunity to outline a proposal with
a price as well as outline their needs for a relationship going forward, or
to confirm that they are not interested.

Suggested Message to Sanjiv Sidhu

Our suggested message to Sanjiv is:
.
1. Enron remains interested in exploring this opportunity with i2 if there is
a genuine interest from i2.
2.   Enron is open to considering deal structures that provide incentive for
participation by Enron after the transaction.
3.   Enron is moving down the path with other parties, so if i2 has an
interest, we would need to start working with them soon.

Thank you for your assistance on this.  Please let us know if you need more
information.


We received the executed EEI Master Power Purchase and Sale Agreement dated 9/1/01 from the referenced CP.  A copy will be scanned into Livelink.


What will happen to this project.  Alaska?
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)

-----Original Message-----
From: Tu, Denis <Denis.Tu@ENRON.com>
To: Rosenberg, David E. <David.Rosenberg@ENRON.com>; Hayslett, Rod <Rod.Hayslett@ENRON.com>
Sent: Tue Nov 20 07:30:06 2001
Subject: RE: Toll Model Review Meeting Updates

Talked to Morgan.  The ETS cost estimate is just the Level A cost estimate done by Bryan Reinecke in his Group.  He added that the R.O.W. cost is one of the items has high uncertainty.  Jerry Martin's Group has been not been asked to look at the project.

-----Original Message-----
From: Rosenberg, David E.
Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2001 12:05 PM
To: Hayslett, Rod
Cc: Tu, Denis
Subject: RE: Toll Model Review Meeting Updates

Suggest asking Mike Smith also.  To me looks like the capex inflation and O&M inflation are backasswards.

-----Original Message-----
From: Hayslett, Rod
Sent: Sat 11/17/2001 9:32 AM
To: Lee, Jebong
Cc: Tu, Denis; Rosenberg, David E.
Subject: RE: Toll Model Review Meeting Updates

You should get these 2 experts in pipeline modelling and estimating involved into the discussion.   They have years of experience in inflation and impacts on pipeline economics.

-----Original Message-----
From: Lee, Jebong
Sent: Fri 11/16/2001 6:24 PM
To: Hill, Robert; Gadd, Eric
Cc: Ratner, Michael; Kissner, Tim; Reinecke, Bryan; Miller, Mary Kay; Hayslett, Rod
Subject: Toll Model Review Meeting Updates

The model review meeting on Thursday went well, and the consensus was that there are many changes to be made to the current Foothills economic model. Many assumptions in the current model were challenged by the participant companies. Foothills agreed to reflect the suggested changes to the model (Andy is supposed to send out a summary of the discussion) and provided an electronic copy of the model for withdrawn partners' review. Withdrawn partners agreed to give their comments/feedback on the model to Foothills until 11/27/01 and another meeting to reach an agreement on economic model/toll was scheduled for 12/03/01 or 12/04/01. The data from economic/toll model will be used in commercial proposal/presentation to the ANS producers which ANNGTC intends to have by 12/20/01. Tim and I will review Foothills' cash flow and COS model and prepare comments.

Overall, the participants though that the current Foothills model ($0.43/MMBtu toll for Alaska section) has very aggressive assumptions in many ways, and it is very likely that the toll will be increased significantly after all the appropriate revisions are made. The following are the main discussion points of the meeting. Item 1 and 2 are expected to have a very large impact on the toll.

1) Capex and Opex need to have annual/monthly escalation (current model has 0% escalation). For example, Foothills sensitivity analysis shows that 2.5% Capex escalation would increase the toll by $0.20. Numbers such as 1.5% for Capex and 2.5% for Opex were thrown during the meeting, but more reviews need to be done regarding appropriate escalation rates. Do you have any opinion on this, Bryan?

2) Foothills is using Flowthrough method (using cash taxes in COS calculation) to calculate income taxes that go into the Cost of Service and might be underestimating Cost of Service. Tim thought that the Flowthrough method will not fly because of previous cases in which that method was not allowed by IRS and FERC. Foothills said that they can still have same toll under Normalized tax method by changing the depreciation number, but Tim was concerned that it might force the partnership to record negative depreciation. Foothills declined our request to share their Cost of Service model and insisted that we calculate the toll ourselves based on the information in the cash flow model. They agreed to provide a hard copy of their Cost of Service model in the end, but Tim and I were under impression that Foothills was trying to lower the toll as much as they can. Tim was also concerned about levelized toll approach because of FERC might lower allowed return in the later rate cases and more analysis needs to done regradign this. Please correct me if I am wrong here, Tim.

3) OM & A is currently estimated to be 1% of Capex but this might be too low (OM&A in more latest cost estimate by Foothills is approx. 1.5% of total Capex).

4) The Withdrawn Partners' historical contributions ($228 million) will be added to the Rate Base, but this might be dropped if necessary. Success fee of $40 million should be included in the project budget.

5) Working Capital will be added to the project cost. The Line Pack cost (14.5 Bcf for the whole section) was assumed to be borne by ANS producers but some participants highly doubted that that would be the case. The Line Pack gas might have to be bought by the Partnership or the Producers will at least demand certain return on their gas sitting in the pipeline for 25 years.

6) For Return on Capital and AFUDC, 14% ROE and 8% Interest on Debt assuming 30/70 capital structure is likely to be kept. However, the current drawdown schedule assumes construction financing available from the very beginning, which will not be true. Certain assumptions should be made on the financial close date and commercial agreement/preliminary determination date to calculate AFUDC more accurately.

7) Current financing assumption in the model is a 25 year bank loan with balloon amortization and DSCR of 1.6. In reality, the initial bank loans will be of shorter maturity (5-15 years) and certain roll-over financing will be unavoidable. It is also likely that the loans will have multiple tranches with different terms, interest rate, seniority etc.

8) There is significant currency risk associated with Canadian section of the ANGTS considering that some sources of capital, revenues and part of operating expenses will be in Canadian dollars. A mechanis to mitigate currency risk should be in place and there might be some costs associated with it.

9) Property taxes of 2% in Alaska seems high, but Property taxes during construction period should be added.

Lastly, there is about $300 million difference ($4,336-$4035) between ETS current cost estimates and the cost estimate in the Foothills model, excluding IDC and AFUDC. Another engineering estimate might have to be dome for larger pipe size (46 or 48 inch) as noted in Bryan's email.

Thanks,

JB

Jebong Lee
713-853-9722 office
713-306-8658 cell


Welcome to eMail News Delivery, a service from Business Wire.
Here is your Industrial Information Resources Inc. news release.
If you have received this in error please send a message to:
eMailDelivery@businesswire.com
with the following command in the body of the message:
 unsubscribe TX-INDUSTRIAL-INFO-RES
If you have questions about this service, please contact your
Business Wire Account Executive or service@businesswire.com

BW0037  OCT 15,2001       2:01 PACIFIC      05:01 EASTERN

( BW)(TX-INDUSTRIAL-INFO-RES) Brach & Brock Confections Plan New Plant
South of the Border, in an Advisory by Industrialinfo.com

    Business Editors

	   HOUSTON--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Oct. 15, 2001--Researched by
Industrialinfo.com (Industrial Information Resources Inc.; Houston,
Texas). Brach & Brock Confections Incorporated (Chicago, Ill.), a
privately held company, has begun construction on a new $50 million
confections plant in Linares, Nuevo Leon, Mexico.
	   Site work commenced back in mid September on a 350,000 square foot
plant that will be the new home to Brach's line of candy corn and
other seasonal confectionary products that used to be produced at the
soon to be phased out plant in Chicago, Illinois.
	   Jacobs Severdrup (Saint Louis, Mo.) is providing design services
and their Mexico division, Kujesa-Jacobs (Mexico City, District
Federale Mexico), will install the production lines and provide
construction management services. Group Garza Punzo (Monterrey, Nuevo
Leon, Mexico) will act as the general contractor for the 350,000
square foot production building shell. The project is scheduled for
completion in August of 2003.
	   Industrialinfo.com reported back in January 2001 that the company
had announced plans for a phased shutdown of the 2.3 million square
foot Chicago confections plant due to high domestic sugar prices, the
age of the nearly century old facility and consolidation among major
candy players. All manufacturing operations in Chicago will cease by
the end of 2003, but their headquarters will remain there.
	   Originally founded in 1904 by Emil J. Brach, Brach Confections
purchased Brock Candy Company in 1994 forming Brach & Brock
Confections Incorporated, which produces over 200 varieties of
candies, chocolates and fruit snacks.
	   For more information on trends and upcoming construction
activities in the Food and Beverage market as well as other industrial
sectors send inquiries to foodandbeveragegroup@industrialinfo.com or
visit us at www.industrialinfo.com.

    --30--CM/na*

    CONTACT: Industrialinfo.com, Houston
             Trey Hamblet, 713/783-5147

    KEYWORD: TEXAS MEXICO INTERNATIONAL LATIN AMERICA
    INDUSTRY KEYWORD: FOODS/BEVERAGES MANUFACTURING
    SOURCE: Industrialinfo.com

For the best viewing of the news releases please
 use the following email settings:  Courier 10 point.
 -Notice of Copyright and General Disclaimer-
 (c) 2000 Business Wire. All of the releases provided by Business Wire
 are protected by copyright and other applicable laws, treaties and
 conventions. Information contained in the releases is furnished by
 Business Wire`s members who are solely responsible for their content,
 accuracy and originality. All reproduction, other than for an
 individual user`s reference, is prohibited without prior written
 permission.

- Notice of Copyright and General Disclaimer --
(c) 1999 Business Wire. All of the releases provided by Business Wire
are protected by copyright and other applicable laws, treaties and
conventions. Information contained in the releases is furnished by
Business Wire`s members who are solely responsible for their content,
accuracy and originality. All reproduction, other than for an
individual user`s reference, is prohibited without prior written
permission.


Les,

Thanks. The same to you. Merry Christmas to you and your family.

Vince Kaminski

Les Clewlow <Les_Clewlow@compuserve.com> on 12/19/99 02:39:58 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski@ECT, Grant Masson@ECT, Paul
Quilkey/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:
Subject: Merry Xmas and a Happy New Year!

Hi All

Merry Xmas and a Happy New Year!

Les.


Thanks for your note. I want to wish you the best of luck in EES. As far as
RAC's issues with EES, I would suggest getting together with Tribolet and
getting some of the lists that have been put together as part of the task
force. I would also suggest attending the task force meeting, providing EES
management is agreeable, to get a better picture of what is going on.

Again, I hate to see you go but it will still be value added to RAC and
Enron. Have fun!!

Rick


a little snooty huh?

	From:  Ami Chokshi @ ENRON                           01/05/2000 03:50 PM

To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Deals 104641 & 104639

yes


----- Forwarded by Dean Sacerdote/NA/Enron on 11/01/2000 08:37 AM -----

	Lacye Trevino
	11/01/2000 07:57 AM

		 To: "Daniel Ajtai" <d_ajtai@hotmail.com>, STDAGG11@shsu.edu, Katherine
Benedict/HOU/ECT@ECT, "Bernal, Kimmberly" <BernalK@bayltd.com>, "Jeffcoat,
Christopher A (Chris)" <Christopher.Jeffcoat@relizon.com>, chasj@ev1.net,
"Deborah McArthur" <dmcarthur@ar-d.com>, staceyduke@hotmail.com,
nhall90@yahoo.com, Melissa Jones/NA/Enron@ENRON, kande_is@mindspring.com,
Dayem Khandker/NA/Enron@Enron, Kate Lykes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mirna
Mejia/HOU/ECT@ECT, do'hearn@wheeleradvertising.com (David O'Hearn), Charla
Reese/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, "Keiser, Jeanelle (COMPRINT S)"
<jkeiser@wetmore-printing.com>, Dean Sacerdote/NA/Enron@Enron,
stacysams@bfmprinting.com, jennstrauss@yahoo.com, scottzab@hotmail.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Happy Halloween!

----- Forwarded by Lacye Trevino/NA/Enron on 11/01/2000 07:54 AM -----

	Monica Jackson
	10/31/2000 05:04 PM

		 To: lulilulu@aol.com, tripeter@yahoo.com, lcerquera@aglife.com, Katherine
Crosswhite/HOU/ECT@ECT, elvislives@earthlink.net, Laurie
Davidson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, rdiaz1@aglife.com,
patches@logicalimage.net, bb@wingfield-sears.com, Ryan
Hinze/Corp/Enron@ENRON, rojyjohny@yahoo.com, Melissa Jones/NA/Enron@ENRON,
"lizard" <lizard3@ev1.net>, jason@wehearu.com, lyssa2886@aol.com,
linda.k.mott@mail.sprint.com, jefnoblin@hotmail.com, hoskouie@urbangroup.net,
shaunagray@earthlink.net, Angela.Villagomez@enron.com, Lacye
Trevino/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Happy Halloween!

---------------------- Forwarded by Monica Jackson/Corp/Enron on 10/31/2000
05:05 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Beth A Ryan @ ECT                           10/31/2000 02:56 PM

To: <janie.e.paradoski@exxon.com> @ ENRON, "Newman, Linda" <LNewman@IKON.com>
@ ENRON, Evelyn Aucoin <EAucoin@accusys.com> @ ENRON, "lisa"
<lisadkins@ev1.net>, "William Ryan" <wmryan@home.com> @ ENRON, "Thomas Ryan"
<tryan87@hotmail.com>, jryan90@yahoo.com, Tracy Greene/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lillian
Carroll/HOU/ECT@ECT, Monica Jackson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Happy Halloween!

This one is too cute!

 - ATT19368.jpg


Janet,
 I have changed the attached for ENA.  Please let me know if you need
anything further.

	Janet H Wallis
	03/09/2001 10:58 AM

		 To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Austin Energy Contract Draft

I would like to make the name Enron North America because this will be the
contract I expect to trade on after the sale.  Thanks


My morning is fairly open, other than grinding on the purchase contract.

Heather Kroll@ECT
10/22/2000 01:31 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Jeffery Ader/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Healy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen
Plauche/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: CRRA LOI

Let's meet in the morning and discuss the LOI.

Kay,

To briefly answer your questions, we are contemplating another layer of
documents with the EPC contract.  There will also be a Development Agreement
that outlines our development activities and our nonrefundable fee.  I don't
read his comments to mean he only wants one EPC contract.  Let's discuss
tomorrow.  Also, we've told Bob Wright that if the plants don't work, the
state gets its money back.  I think he and everyone involved would be
amenable to a performance band provided that a comparable reduction in price
accompanies the reduced performance (to the 10 percent floor, of course).
This LOI outlines the EPC contracts only.  The Development Agreement will
cover our fee.  So, no, our fee is not at risk for the fuel cells failing to
perform.  We will have some risk on BOP if the plants fail.

What time works for everybody?  How about 9:30?

Heather

	From:  Kay Mann @ ENRON                           10/21/2000 12:14 PM

To: Jeffery Ader/HOU/ECT@ECT, Heather Kroll/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Healy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ozzie Pagan/HOU/ECT@ECT, swanita_99@yahoo.com
cc:
Subject: CRRA LOI

Hi guys,

In looking at CRRA's comments to the draft LOI. I have these questions:

1.  I'm not sure what we mean by EPC contract.  Is this referring to the Fuel
Cell document we are working now, or is there to be another layer? I know
this may depend on whether CRRA or someone else is doing the balance of the
construction activities.

2.  He expects one EPC contract, and we had tried to leave room for multiple
contracts. Does anyone care?

3.  Does CRRA get a full refund of the purchase price if the fuel cells fail
the performance tests?  We have discussed with FCE the concept of a
proportional reduction if the performance is within 10 percent, then a full
reduction as to the failing unit(s) only.  Also, are we planning to mark up
the fuel cell contract to recover our fee?  Is our fee at risk for the fuel
cells failing to perform?

Thanks,

Kay


What are my choices for dates?
---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT on 07/06/2000
03:44 PM ---------------------------

David W Delainey
06/29/2000 10:48 AM
To: Jeffery Ader/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward D
Baughman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg Blair/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Bryan Burnett/HOU/ECT@ECT, George Carrick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joseph
Deffner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janet R Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT, Craig A Fox/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Julie A Gomez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Jakubik/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Josey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Fred Lagrasta/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J
Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, Thomas A Martin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gil
Muhl/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jesse Neyman/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Edward Ondarza/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ozzie Pagan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin M
Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike A Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim Schwieger/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bruce Sukaly/Corp/Enron@Enron, Colleen
Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Swerzbin/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Thompson/LON/ECT@ECT,
Carl Tricoli/Corp/Enron@Enron, Greg Wolfe/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Billy Lemmons/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Executive Impact and Influence Course

Folks, you are the remaining officers of ENA that have not yet enrolled in
this mandated training program.  It is ENA's goal to have all its officers
through the program before the end of calendar year 2000.  The course has
received very high marks for effectiveness.  Please take time now to enroll
in the program. Speak to your HR representative if you need help getting
signed up.

Regards
Delainey


Richard, Wheeler's deposition started today,? Here is a report.
Steve

 <<depsum10.30>>

This e-mail message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee
or agent responsible for delivery of this message to the intended
recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail message is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify
the sender and delete this e-mail message from your computer.

 - depsum10.30


Stewart:

I spoke with Rawleigh White (Tribal CFO) and the Tribe's outside counsel the
other day.  Pending receipt of Tracy's credit worksheet, I'll send the
Tribe/lawyers a "sample ISDA without credit" which is not specific to the
Tribe.  The lawyers will begin to determine if the Tribe is an "eligible
contract participant" for purposes of the Commodity Exchange Act.

Rawleigh wants to know if Enron is interested in helping the Tribe finance
the purchase of the two dams.  Can you please address for West Origination
and respond to Raleigh?

Thanks.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


Further to our conversation, please see the attached draft of a Master Firm Purchase/Sale Agreement for your review.  Please do not hesitate to give me a call with any questions and or comments regarding the enclosed.

Regards,
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Legal
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron
713-853-7658
713-646-3490 Fax


The report named: West NG Basis Positions_All <http://trv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=37&report_name=West+NG+Basis+Positions_All&category_cd=2&category_name=WEST&toc_hide=1&sTV1=2&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=11/26/2001>, published as of 11/26/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


oh yeah.


Reminder Craig Gannett meeting with Senator Gorton
Henry Hubbard -- 207 397 5091
Steve Montovano 800 650 9084
Greg Piper
Carol Dillon 503-464-8536
Kathleen -- Providence Gas (Mike McCall)
Linda Clemmons -- MIT forum at MIT


John,

I think it's a good idea. Please, go ahead and call
him directly.

Vince

"John D. Martin" <J_Martin@baylor.edu> on 02/13/2001 06:12:48 PM
To: vkamins@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Question

Vince,

What do you think about asking Andy Fastow to come to the Texas Finance
Festival this April as our luncheon speaker?  If you agree I'll go ahead
and call him.  If you have an opportunity to speak with him about the
conference that would be great.  The date is April 21st (that's a Saturday).

Hope you are enjoying NY.  Shirley tells me that you're running up your
frequent flyer miles again.

your friend,

john

>Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 17:29:42 -0600
>From: Sheridan Titman <titman@mail.utexas.edu>
>Subject: Re: oops
>X-Sender: titman@mail.utexas.edu
>To: "John D. Martin" <J_Martin@baylor.edu>
>X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.1 (32)
>
>John:
>
>I like your Enron article.  I will assign it to my students.  Do you think
>we can get the CFO for the TFF?  I saw that he is making a presentation to
>a conference of CFOs in Dallas about capital structure.
>
>Sheridan
>
>At 09:15 AM 2/7/01 -0600, you wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>John D. Martin
>>Carr P. Collins Chair in Finance
>>Finance Department
>>Baylor University
>>PO Box 98004
>>Waco, TX 76798
>>254-710-4473 (Office)
>>254-710-1092 (Fax)
>>J_Martin@Baylor.edu
>>web:    http://hsb.baylor.edu/html/martinj/home.html
>Sheridan Titman
>Department of Finance
>College of Business Administration
>University of Texas
>Austin, Texas 78712-1179
>
>512-232-2787 (phone)
>512-471-5073 (fax)
>
>titman@mail.utexas.edu
>
John D. Martin
Carr P. Collins Chair in Finance
Finance Department
Baylor University
PO Box 98004
Waco, TX 76798
254-710-4473 (Office)
254-710-1092 (Fax)
J_Martin@Baylor.edu
web:    http://hsb.baylor.edu/html/martinj/home.html


-----Original Message-----
From: Theriot, Kim S.
Sent: Wed 12/26/2001 4:21 PM
To: Lim, Francis S.
Cc: Gupta, Sanjeev; Gossett, Jeffrey C.; Reeves, Leslie
Subject: New list of Financial Nat Gas Terminations

Attached is the new list of Financial Nat. Gas deal terminations by Counterparty.  Please move all Financial Natural Gas transactions for the relevant Counterparties on the attached list to the Bankruptcy Book.  Again, I have included the CP ID's for your reference.  Please let myself and Jeff Gossett know when the move has been completed.  Please call with any questions.

<<Financial Terminations 12-19.xls>>


Ina,

Ya, the departure should now be Thursday Oct. 18th.  I think the 11:15 am flight will do.  Everything else remains the same.  Thanks.

Mat

PS.  My frequent flyer # is EG235566

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rangel, Ina
Sent:	Wednesday, October 10, 2001 6:52 PM
To:	Smith, Matt
Subject:	RE: Portland flight

Do you know what changes you are going to make yet?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Smith, Matt
Sent:	Sunday, October 07, 2001 6:35 PM
To:	Rangel, Ina
Cc:	Holst, Keith
Subject:	Portland flight

Ina,
Please book me on these flights to Portland.  Also, please arrange a reservation at the Vintage hotel for Sunday, Monday, and Tuesday nights (21st through 24th).  Thank you.
Mat << OLE Object: Picture (Metafile) >>
Fri 19-Oct-01 1833 mi (2950 km)
4hr 25mn Houston (IAH)
Depart 11:45 AM to Portland (PDX)
Arrive 2:10 PM  << OLE Object: Picture (Metafile) >>
Flight: 478
Economy/Coach Class, Lunch, Boeing 737-300
Total miles: 1833 mi (2950 km)
Total flight time: 4hr 25mn
Wed 24-Oct-01 1833 mi (2950 km)
4hr 5mn Portland (PDX)
Depart 3:00 PM to Houston (IAH)
Arrive 9:05 PM  << OLE Object: Picture (Metafile) >>
Flight: 128
Economy/Coach Class, Dinner, Boeing 737-300
Total miles: 1833 mi (2950 km)
Total flight time: 4hr 5mn


---------------------- Forwarded by Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT on
01/13/99 07:47 PM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  xtrials@optioninvestor.com (Option Investor Newsletter     Trials)
                       01/13/99 07:28 PM

Please respond to xtrials@optioninvestor.com
To: Option Investor Newsletter Trials <xtrials@optioninvestor.com>
cc:  (bcc: Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT)
Subject: Wednesday - Option Investor Newsletter - Update

The Option Investor Newsletter         Wednesday  1-13-98
Copyright 1998, All rights reserved.
Redistribution in any form strictly prohibited.

Posted online for subscribers at http://WWW.OPTIONINVESTOR.COM

Also provided as a service to The Online Investor Advantage

Published three times weekly, Sunday, Tuesday, Thursday evenings.
******************************************************************
MARKET WRAP
******************************************************************
        01-13-98         High     Low     Volume   Advances Decline
DOW     9349.56 -125.12 9471.34  9213.10  934,809k  1,021   2,090
Nasdaq  2317.30 -  3.40 2353.87  2206.19 1195,400k  1,628   2,504
S&P-100  612.83 -  3.66  620.45   598.01   Totals   2,649   4,594
S&P-500 1234.40 -  5.11 1247.66  1206.59            36.6%   63.4%
$RUT     424.86 -  2.50  427.36   412.64
$TRAN   3169.42 - 37.23 3202.50  3085.21
VIX       31.26 +  4.88   35.48    29.55
Put/Call Ratio      .48
******************************************************************

The Nightmare on Wall Street, Starring China, Brazil, Argentina and
others.

I woke up with a terrible nightmare this morning. I dreamed that
the S&P Futures were limit down -27 and the Dow futures were down
-300. The bad news - it was not a nightmare, it was real life.

If you don't live in a closet you know by now that the Brazil
counterpart to Alan Greenspan resigned and Brazil devalued its
currency. The worst possible of all global scenarios. But wait!
Is that another dip to buy?

After opening down -266 on the Dow and -113 on the Nasdaq, the worst
was over before it started. The CNBC hype undoubtedly contributed
to the massive sell off because as soon as buyers could get into
the market we moved immediately off the panic lows.

I am not saying this is not a problem but as I said last night I
thought Brazil had already been discounted in the market. The
rapid bounce back has proven this to some extent. Several analysts
said several months ago that we could expect -500 to -600 if Brazil
devalued. Since it did not happen it shows the strength of the
current bull market.

I went on record last night that I did not think we were starting
a correction and the bull was just resting. Was I worried this
morning? You bet! But I was also greatly relieved when I saw the
buyers come back to work. Think about it. What else can happen
that could be worse than this? Nothing I can imagine. Sure the
Asian connection to Brazil will be tested tonight and we are still
faced with the domino theory in South America, but again, I think
the worst is already discounted. As soon as investors realize that
Latin America did not sink beneath the ocean and the IMF is not
going to let the eighth largest economy in the world sink, then
they will be putting that cash back to work.

The volume this morning was not bad. The volume on the recovery
this afternoon was great. The Nasdaq did almost 1.2 billion shares
again and the NYSE over 900 mil. The market is expecting earnings
by the dozens next week and appears ready to rumble.

Intel broke with the pack early and starred in the recovery adding
+3.44 for the day. Microsoft, SunMicro and almost anything tech
shook off the news and powered forward. SunMicro was up over $10
at one point on takeover rumors by IBM. IBM announced they were
raising over $4 bil in new cash today which was earmarked in part
for acquisitions. Microsoft and Dell were up strongly at midday
but caved in at the close.

Traders fear of darkness was apparent as the Dow backslid from
-35 to -125 and the Nasdaq turned slightly negative at the close.
The fear of course comes from going to bed with profits and
waking up the next day to surprises from Asia like we had from
Brazil this morning. Tonight will tell the tale. If Asia does
not melt and the politicians in Brazil work their magic and say
the words analysts want to hear then it is off to the races again.

At the risk of repeating myself too much, there just seems to be
nothing that can derail this market. I took a bloodbath this morning
but when I saw it was not going to get worse I jumped back in and
got some bargains at really good prices. As evidenced by the quick
bounce there were other blue light shoppers there as well.

The VIX settled at 31 after being as high as 35.48 and appears
to confirm the worst to be over.

Apple Computer easily beat the street estimates tody after the
close and more strong earnings are due out soon from MSFT, IBM,
SUNW, SLR, etc. All are expected to do well. No skeletons in the
U.S. economy so look for continued movement upward barring any
sympathy crashes overseas tonight.

Good Luck

Jim Brown

FREE TRIAL READERS
******************
If you like the results you have been receiving we
would welcome you as a permanent subscriber.

The monthly subscription price is 39.95. The quarterly
price is 99.95 which is $20 off the monthly rate.

We would like to have you as a subscriber. You may
subscribe at any time but your subscription will not
start until your free trial is over.

To subscribe you may go to our website at

www.optioninvestor.com

and click on "subscribe" to use our secure credit
card server or you may simply send an email to

 "subscribe@optioninvestor.com"

with your credit card information,(number, exp date, name)
or you may call us at 303-797-0200 and give us the
information over the phone.

You may also fax the information to: 303-797-1333

DISCLAIMER
***********
Please see the disclaimer on our website.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Vanek, Darren
Sent:	Tuesday, July 24, 2001 9:32 AM
To:	Perlingiere, Debra
Subject:	RE: ENA-Duke Energy Marketing Limited Partnership

Debra,
Can you please forward me a copy of the proposed contract along with any guaranties that might pertain to it.
-d

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Perlingiere, Debra
Sent:	Thursday, July 19, 2001 12:00 PM
To:	Vanek, Darren
Subject:	RE: ENA-Duke Energy Marketing Limited Partnership

  I have been negotiating this agreement withthis counter party for greater than 6 months and we are close.   Give me a call to discuss.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Vanek, Darren
Sent:	Wednesday, July 11, 2001 5:02 PM
To:	Perlingiere, Debra
Cc:	Williams, Jason R (Credit); Espinoza, Veronica
Subject:	ENA-Duke Energy Marketing Limited Partnership

Debra,

Please do not send out an Enfolio for the aforementioned counterparties. I am currently working on reviewing the entire relationship and allocating the appropriate lines.

-Darren


BammelYoungFamilies

--------------------------- ListBot Sponsor --------------------------
Get a low APR NextCard Visa in 30 seconds!
     1.  Fill in the brief application
     2.  Receive approval decision within 30 seconds
     3.  Get rates as low as 2.99% Intro or 9.99% Ongoing APR and no
annual fee!
Apply NOW!
http://www.bcentral.com/listbot/NextCard
----------------------------------------------------------------------
http://my.servepics.com/pictures/2001/06-09_Pzl_Place_Flood/page00.htm

______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, write to BammelYoungFamilies-unsubscribe@listbot.com


Be the first to master new IntraLinks, and get a jump on the competition.

During the next two weeks, IntraLinks is offering online orientation
sessions so you can get the most out of the new service.  We're providing a
flexible schedule, a quick session (only half an hour), at the perfect
location - your desktop.

What's in it for you? Familiarize yourself with the redesigned easy-to-use
interface and learn some special tips from the pros - including getting the
most out of the improved collaboration features. And to get you started
right, here's your first tip:  Save time logging on to any IntraLinks
digital workspace: use your email address as your username.

Sign up here:  http://www.intralinks.com/better/

If you need assistance, our 24 x 7 customer care team is always available
to help:

Toll-free in the continental U.S.: 1- 888-546-5383
New York: 212-543-7800
UK Freephone: 0800 358 0015
London: +44 20 7626 5556
support@intralinks.com

Your IntraLinks Team
www.intralinks.com


TECO   TAP                    32.500/ HPL IFERC

TEXOMA                           20.000/ HPL IFERC

LS HPL KATY                   40.000/ ENRON


FYI -

In case you haven't yet seen this, below is a link to a May 2001 CEC report
on gas infrastructure.

http://www.energy.ca.gov/reports/2001-05-22_200-01-001.PDF


Subject: New Virus Alert !!!

New Virus Taking Offices By Storm
  This virus warning is genuine.

There is a new virus going around, called "work."   If you receive any sort
of "work" at all, whether via email, Internet or simply handed to you by a
colleague...DO NOT OPEN IT.

This has been circulating around our building for months and those who have
been tempted to open "work" or even look at "work" have found that their
social life is deleted and their brain ceases to function properly.  If you
do encounter "work" via email or are faced with any "work" at all, then to
purge the virus, send an email to your boss with the words "I've had enough
of your crap...  I'm off to the bar."    Your brain should automatically
forget the "work".

If you receive "work" in paper-document form, simply lift the document and
drag the "work" to your garbage can.  Put on your hat and coat and skip to
the nearest bar with two friends and order three bottles of beer  (or rum
punch). After repeating this action 14 times, you will find  that "work"
will no longer be of any relevance to you  and that "Scooby Doo" was the
greatest cartoon ever.


ADMINISTRATIVE

Japan National Television - John Ambler and Mike Terraso were interviewed
regarding Enron's Climate Change iniatives and statement.

Enron Campus - Ken Lovejoy and Clifford Salawage of ETS (manager Health and
Industrial Hygiene) met employees in the Enron building that have concerns
about the indoor air quality in their work area.  The issue is being
evaluated to determine an action plan.

EUROPE

Poland, ENS Power Plant - Alan Stringer conducted EHS gap analysis audit of
the facility and made recommendations on additional procedures required to
meet Enron Guidelines and provided advice on EHS aspects for exit strategy of
the site.

UK, Project McCook - Alan Stringer participated in a conference call with
Susan Worthen, Don Stevens, and Robert Brooks to discuss environmental issues
related to indemnification.  This deal is estimated to be signed next week..
Susan,s Team will need to conduct a due diligence within 60 days.

Japan, Brownfield Site  - Alan Stringer provided technical assistance and
requested historical information on potential brownfield site that EEOS are
considering in Japan.

UK, EPOL - TPS -    Alan Stringer and Henry Van are preparing the final list
of EHS issues from the O&M audit to be presented to Mike Terraso for
resolution.

ENRON GLOBAL ASSETS
(Central America, South America, India and Asia)

San Juan Gas Remediation - field evidence indicates that the tar has migrated
off-site to the neighbor,s property.

ENA

N. York, Edison Mission Brooklyn Navy Yard Facility - Bill Curra completed
the environmental due diligence evaluation of the Edison Mission cogeneration
plant for NE Power Origination.  Indications are favorable that the
acquisition will go forward, and further risk management assistance relating
to environmental issues will be required.

ACQUISITIONS

Sithe Independent Power Partners - 1000 MW combined cycle natural gas fired
cogeneration facility located in the Town of Scriba, County of Oswego, NY.
ECT is interested in entering into a 40% limited partnership with no O&M
responsibility.  Don Stevens has learned that ECT has submitted their bid to
Sithe and is awaiting a response.

GREENFIELD CAPITAL PROJECTS

Offshore LNG Vaporization Terminal - California - Gus Eghneim (Enron Corp)
has been asked to manage environmental permitting for an offshore LNG
vaporization terminal in California.  Gus has agreed to keep Joe Kolb
informed and involved at the next meeting.  The project is in the very early
stages of consideration.

DEPARTMENT PROJECTS

Social Responsibility Risk Assessment Tool - Gavin Dillingham met with Lauren
Iannarone and they decided to add some more functionality to the database.
They will add a section for case studies, transaction cost and industry type.
Once this is done it will be populated and the prototype will be demonstrated
to interested Enron business units.

REGULATORY TECHNICAL ANALYSIS

Enron IT Employee Receives Ergonomics Relieve - Russell Tucker located a
workstation solution to allow the raising of the desk top in selectable
increments to provide back strain relieve to an Enron IT employee that is 6'
8" tall. The replacement desk will also allow the employee to remain in his
present location within his work group with the desk fitting within the
original desk space.

COMPETITIVE INTELLIGENCE & BUSINESS OPPORTUNITIES

California Power Development -- NEPA Review -  Jeff Keeler and Mary Schoen
held a meeting with EWS/ENA West power developers to discuss a proposed
project in Roseville, CA.   Since the project must connect to the Western
Area Power Administration (WAPA) through a substation, WAPA is suggesting
that it may need to perform not only a NEPA analysis from the Enron project
to the substation, but on the entire WAPA grid, due to NEPA's mandate to
analyze "all downstream impact."   Jeff and Mary are working on strategies to
determine:  1) if it is legally feasible to conduct NEPA review just for the
Enron project portion so that Cal. Energy Commission process is not delayed
and 2)  if agencies involved in NEPA review will comply with Bush executive
orders mandating expedited review of power project permit applications.

Emissions Control Technology -- Clean Coal Funding - Jeff Keeler discussed
with EGM a preliminary strategy for pursuing DOE clean coal program funding
for a demonstration project or commercialization grant for the Clean
Solutions Group's "NOx Tech" pollution control technology.

Voluntary Greenhouse Gas Emissions Target Analysis - ; Lisa Jacobson and
Susan Worthen offered recommendations and analysis on voluntary greenhouse
gas emissions commitments to Mike Terraso.; Lisa continued to identify
opportunities and business activity related to greenhouse gas emissions
issues (Climate Neutral Network conference, GEMI conference).

Global Climate Change -  Lisa Jacobson continued to provide intelligence to
business units and corporate groups on climate change policy developments,
including:
Canada's negotiations with the EU and announcement that it may work to
support the Kyoto protocol
Japan's discussions with the US and EU, and resulting announcement that Japan
will not move forward with any climate change agreement without the US.
Delay in release of EU climate change policies (coordinated with Govt.
Affairs, Brussels/London)
US congressional activity on climate change

Sterling Energy/Renewable Desk - Stacey Bolton followed up w/CEO and COO from
Sterling Planet regarding the renewable desk potentially supplying them green
tags. Organized call between Sterling and ENA West for next week to explore
business opportunities.;; Stacey is working with Sarah Novosel (Reg Affairs,
Washington) to detail Enron's position before FERC regarding intermittency.;
Elliot Mainzer is speaking at;a FERC hearing;in July, and coordinating
position w/ Sarah.

ADVOCACY & COMMERCIAL SUPPORT

Multipollutant & New Source Review Strategies - Jeff Keeler and
representatives of the power generation industry met with EPA concerning its
90-day review of the NSR program and its proposed recommendations to the
White House.   The group briefed EPA staff from the Administrator's office,
Office of Air and Radiation, NSR Enforcement office and White House Council
of Economic Advisors on NSR concerns for new power development and our
proposed multipollutant solutions that could offer and alternative to NSR.

Global Climate Change - Lisa  Jacobosn and Jeff Keeler continued work on a
number of initiatives with commercial and corporate groups:
Congressional advocacy - Lisa represented Enron at a Climate Change lobby day
sponsored by several environmental groups. Enron was the only company to make
a formal presentation on its position on global climate change.  About 100
delegates were present, representing the scientific, religious, business and
environmental communities from Washington, New Mexico, Ohio, Florida,
Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Louisiana, Maine, New Hampshire, Michigan, and
Maryland.


This is the last e-mail I received from Laura. Looks like she forgot the
attachment the first time.

---------------------- Forwarded by Kate Symes/PDX/ECT on 10/11/2000 08:37 AM
---------------------------

	From:  Laura Wente                           10/10/2000 06:08 PM

To: nancy.f.white@betzdearborn.com
cc: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Ed Clark/PDX/ECT@ECT, Mark Mullen/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Don Hammond/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jody Blackburn/PDX/ECT@ECT, Dale
Rasmussen/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Confidentiality Agreement

Sorry Nancy. I sent this too quickly and left off the attachment the first
time.

Regards,
Laura

---------------------- Forwarded by Laura Wente/HOU/ECT on 10/10/2000 06:06
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Laura Wente                           10/10/2000 05:50 PM

To: nancy.f.white@betzdearborn.com
cc: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Ed Clark/PDX/ECT@ECT, Mark Mullen/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Don Hammond/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jody Blackburn/PDX/ECT@ECT, Dale
Rasmussen/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Confidentiality Agreement

Nancy,

I have attached a draft Confidentiality Agreement for your review. If it is
acceptable, please sign and fax a copy to me at 503-464-3740. We should be
able to begin work with a faxed document in place.

As we discussed, we need to analyze two sources of water for the project;
city water and the port's well water. Please overnight the containers for
collection of the water to me at:

Enron North America
121 SW Salmon, 3WTC 0306
Portland, OR 97204
(Tel.: 503-464-3830)

Ed Clark and I will collect the water samples Friday morning and overnight
them to you (Saturday delivery) to make sure that they are there first thing
Monday morning.

I was able to find a Well and Water Right Evaluation that was performed by
Robinson and Noble, Inc. If you could send your fax number to me and to Kate
Symes (ksymes@enron.com), we will fax you a copy for your review. I will also
work on getting you a conceptual design of the project for analysis of the
waste water flow.

Thank you in advance for your assistance and speedy response. I realize that
we are targeting an aggressive date (the morning of October 23) for the work
to be completed.

Sincerely,
Laura Wente
503-464-3830


Should we have an explanation of index calculation?  It may build more trust
in the numbers.


I am pleased to announce the following organizational changes within EGM Operations & Accounting effective immediately:

Todd Hall will be relocating to London and will assume responsibility for all EGM operational activities in London including Risk Management, Confirmations, Coordination & Settlements and Trade Accounting.  Todd will be working closely with the EGM business unit heads in London to ensure their businesses are being supported in an effective and efficient manner.

Cindy Horn will assume the role of EGM IT & Remote Office Controller.  She will be responsible for the oversight and coordination of all IT projects affecting the Operations group.  Her duties will include monitoring and reporting project timelines and expenses and ensuring IT is being utilized in the most cost-effective manner within Operations.  Cindy will also manage the operational activities of the Singapore and Tokyo offices and coordinate with the Sydney office in regards to EGM operations.

Michelle Bruce will assume responsibility for Risk Management in the Houston office for Crude & Products, Coal and Weather.  She will also continue to manage the Confirmation, Coordination & Settlements and Trade Accounting functions in Houston.

Please join me in congratulating these individuals on their new assignments.


Guys,

One more thing: While Amir wants you to apply concepts explained in lecture
and in the book, he does not want to receive papers with more than 5 pages.
From last semester we learned that 4 pages was often enough to cover the
important points of the questions.

Good luck,

Edgard A. Capdevielle

MBA 2000 Candidate
Walter A. Haas School of Business
University of California, Berkeley
mail: edgard@alumni.haas.org
http://www.edgardcapdevielle.com/


Remember those previous discussions about relaxation?  You know me well
enough to know that I am not easily offended, and in fact have thoroughly
enjoyed the preceding banter.  Still, I do appreciate your remembering that I
am a lady. (I have a bad habit of forgetting.)

To: Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: The life of an egg....

Sorry, I'm just giving you a hard time. Please let me know if my behavior was
inappropriate.


---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 08/22/2000
04:51 PM ---------------------------

"Elizabeth A. VanDersarl" <liz@luntz.com> on 08/22/2000 10:47:36 AM
To: "'skean@enron.com'" <skean@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: RE: Pro Regulation speech

Steve,

Attached please find the pro-regulation speech.  We have a studio reserved
between 4 and 5 PM today.  If it's possible to get comments on the speeches
before the conference call, we would really appreciate it.  I'll forward the
edited deregulation speech to you shortly.

Thanks,

Liz

 <<Pro-Regulation speech.doc>>

 - Pro-Regulation speech.doc


We are pleased to announce organizational changes to the Enron South America
legal department in response to the recent reorganization and realignment of
the principal Enron Wholesale Services business units operating in the
region, Enron Americas and Enron Global Assets.

Randy Young, currently General Counsel of ESA, will be assuming new
responsibilities within Enron.  John Novak will become General Counsel of
ESA, reporting to Mark Haedicke.  The ESA legal department will be
responsible for supporting all Enron Americas and Enron Global Assets
businesses in the region.  Additional legal resources, coordinated by Lance
Schuler, will be provided from EWS Legal in Houston to support ESA's
wholesale activities.  John will also work closely with Bruce Lundstrom,
General Counsel of EGA, to coordinate legal support with respect to the EGA
businesses in the region.  An organizational chart describing the new
structure is attached.

This new structure will enable us to continue to provide quality legal
support across business lines within South America while improving
coordination and providing additional support from Houston for Enron's
existing operating businesses, as well as the new business development
initiatives under way in the region.


Tana

The metals contracts are predominantly managed out of London as London is the
P/L centre for that business. We are putting together some contracts, but
they are for structured transactions and whilst I would hope that we would
place them online at some time in the future, that is some way off. Justin
Boyd should be listed as the point of contact for metals online contracts.

You might want to call the section "Global Markets" rather than "Emerging
Markets" to reflect the business changes.

Regards

Marcus


John Anderson PTC/NERC
Brad Petzold
Power Nav -- John Henry (202) 466-0547


Mary Kay asked me to relay the following comments.  Elizabeth suggested I put them in an E-mail so that the Houston group could discuss sat 3:30.

1.  Item #1 PDT record (roughly page 109)
On TI contract #26849 for 8/18/2001-8/20/2001, report shows scheduled & delivered  volume of 1068 with NO nominated volume.
Elizabeth suspects that this was manually scheduled overrun.
If that is the case, Mary Kay recommends that you make the Nominated column match the volume in the Scheduled column.

2.  Item #3 Footnote #3
Mary Kay suggested the following wording.  Do you agree that this describes what happened?
She is assuming that this was still related to the Force Majeur with Gallup being down, since Operating Capacity went down
from 8/19 to 8/20 then back up on 8/21.

"After operating for a day under the Force Majeure, physical mainline capacity was adjusted based on operating conditions."

- Rita


Any updates on adding the correct legal name to this counterparty name?
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 03/28/2001 09:46 AM -----

	Tana Jones
	03/22/2001 06:03 PM

		 To: Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Walter Guidroz/Enron@EnronXGate, Tom Moran/Enron@EnronXGate
		 Subject: Re: EOL approvals, 3-20-01 _ GCP (US) Response

Sam & Stephanie,

Re:  Cargill Ferrous International

It was my understanding with the EOL Team that all divisions would have the
legal incorporated entity as part of the name.  Stephanie, I my preference is
to kick their Password Application back and get them to change it to read
something like "Cargill Ferrous International, a division of Cargill, Inc."
or "Cargill, Inc. acting through its Cargill Ferrous International Division".

	Samuel Schott
	03/21/2001 01:58 PM

		 To: Walter Guidroz/ENRON@enronXgate @ ENRON, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant
Reves/ENRON@enronXgate@ENRON, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate@ENRON, Cynthia
Clark/ENRON@enronXgate@ENRON, Enron Europe Global Contracts and
Facilities@ENRON, Enron Europe Global CounterParty/LON/ECT@ECT, Stephanie
Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/ENRON@enronXgate@ENRON, Claudia
Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/ENRON@enronXgate@ENRON, Lisa
Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Juana Fayett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jana Morse/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Trang Le/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Maley/LON/ECT@ECT, Sonya Clarke/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim
Davies/LON/ECT@ECT, Karen O'Day/NA/Enron@Enron, Tanya
Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate@ENRON, Kelly Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron, Brian
Lindsay/Enron Communications@Enron Communications@ENRON, EOL Call
Center@ENRON, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill D Hare/HOU/ECT@ect, Amy
Heffernan/Enron Communications@Enron Communications@ENRON, Molly LaFuze/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications@ENRON, Danny Clark/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: EOL approvals, 3-20-01 _ GCP (US) Response

Any GCP adjustments will be highlighted in red.

Attn. GCP_London:
There's a new EOL Counterparty listed in the UK. Please respond.

Best Rgds.

Samuel x3-9890
ENW_GCP

From: Walter Guidroz/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/20/2001 05:30 PM
To: Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel
Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/ENRON@enronXgate,
Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli
Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate, Cynthia Clark/ENRON@enronXgate, Enron Europe
Global Contracts and Facilities@ENRON, Enron Europe Global
CounterParty/LON/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom
Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Claudia Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S
Bradford/ENRON@enronXgate, Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Juana
Fayett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jana Morse/Corp/Enron@Enron, Trang Le/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Paul Maley/LON/ECT@ECT, Sonya Clarke/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim Davies/LON/ECT@ECT,
Karen O'Day/NA/Enron@Enron, Tanya Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Kelly
Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron, Brian Lindsay/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, EOL Call Center@ENRON, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill D
Hare/HOU/ECT@ect, Amy Heffernan/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Molly LaFuze/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Danny Clark/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications
cc:
Subject: EOL approvals, 3-20-01

Please see attached.


Here's the reason the Lehman MASTER AGREEMENT has not been executed.  SS
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 12/21/2000 05:16 PM -----

	Stephanie Panus@ENRON
	12/21/2000 04:27 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: ISDA Master Agreement - ENRON/LBF

FYI - Lehman Master
---------------------- Forwarded by Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron on 12/21/2000
04:26 PM ---------------------------

"Dautenhahn, Kimberly" <kdautenh@lehman.COM> on 12/21/2000 04:21:01 PM
To: "'stephanie.panus@enron.com'" <stephanie.panus@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: ISDA Master Agreement - ENRON/LBF

Stephanie,

I am following up on the above-referenced Agreement on behalf of Richard
Weiss of this office. Before we can send the execution copies to our Zurich
office for signature, we have to obtain an Apostille for the Certificate of
Incorporation and By-laws which you provided. Presently we are waiting on
that. The Guarantee has been prepared and the legal opinion is in the
process of being signed. I hope to have everything to you by next week
sometime.

Please feel free to reply with any questions you might have.

Thank you,
Kimberly

Kimberly A. Dautenhahn
Transaction Management
Corporate Advisory Division
Lehman Brothers
(646) 836-2011/0609 (fax)
kdautenh@lehman.com


When: Friday, August 17, 2001 4:30 PM-5:30 PM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada).

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*


Here is the latest presentation Don and I have put together.  I will be out
till Jan 2nd so have a good holiday.  Thanks
Ben


I have your fax.  Attached is the redline version again.  If this does not
print  let me know and I will fax you the  applicable pages.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


why?  (touchee)

	Paul Kaufman/ENRON@enronXgate
	05/10/2001 01:54 PM

		 To: Janel Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark
Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda
Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Ray Alvarez/NA/Enron@ENRON, Daniel
Allegretti/NA/Enron@Enron, Howard Fromer/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan M Landwehr/NA/Enron@Enron, Karen
Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Lora Sullivan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda J
Noske/HOU/ECT@ECT, Terri Miller/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: RE: campaign leadership agenda

I'd like to add a report on the WGA meeting yesterday re:  RTO West and
Transmission.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Guerrero, Janel
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 9:40 AM
To: Shapiro, Richard; Palmer, Mark; Steffes, James; Robertson, Linda;
Alvarez, Ray; Allegretti, Daniel; Fromer, Howard; Kaufman, Paul; Dasovich,
Jeff; Landwehr, Susan; Denne, Karen
Cc: Sullivan, Lora; Dernehl, Ginger; Noske, Linda; Miller, Terri
Subject: campaign leadership agenda

May 10, 2001
Agenda

California
Update on meetings with Governor Davis
 outlook for solution package
Update on meetings with Chamber/CMA et al
Ending of special session/passage of bonds legislation
CPUC tiered rate increases
ISO update
IEP/DA coalition update
Press update
CA briefing book
Other issues??

Western States
Upcoming meetings/scheduling
Press outreach

New York
FERC adoption of NY ISO rules
Official coalition name: Empire State Energy Suppliers
Registration as non-profit with the state
By laws
Letter of Agreement with the state
Update on development of message
Advertising effort
IPPNY message

Washington, DC
Barton markup
Bush energy plan
FERC update
DOE update
CEO Summitt
Press update
Other issues?

Price Risk Managment
Update

Litigation
Update


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 09/11/2000
10:21 AM ---------------------------

"hollyw" <hollyw@email.msn.com> on 08/24/2000 08:14:22 AM
To: "Darron C Giron" <Darron.C.Giron@enron.com>, "Debbie Hall"
<gmind@icsi.net>
cc:
Subject: Fw: THE TRUE OLYMPIC SPIRIT

I say staged.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Warren, Stacy" <swarre02@coair.com>
To: "'Ugly Boo (E-mail)'" <hollyw@email.msn.com>
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2000 4:47 PM
Subject: FW: THE TRUE OLYMPIC SPIRIT

> Excellent!
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wanda Harding [mailto:wharding@redsky.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 14, 2000 4:02 PM
> To: Alan Birchenough (E-mail); Alisa Mayfield Conboy (E-mail); Brian Mann
> (E-mail); Dave Pitschel (E-mail); Hazel Birchenough (E-mail); Heather
> Sullivan (E-mail); Ignacio Martinez (E-mail); Jeff Bishop (E-mail); Jeff
> Draper (E-mail); Jennifer Vodvarka (E-mail); Jim Terando (E-mail); Lori
> Stull (E-mail); Pegi Newhouse (E-mail); Rick Pleczko (E-mail); Warren,
> Stacy; Wes Manning (E-mail); Jeff Harris
> Subject: FW: THE TRUE OLYMPIC SPIRIT
>
>
>
>
>
> Subject:        FW: THE TRUE OLYMPIC SPIRIT
>
> <<sportszeru biciklis.mpg>>
>
>
>
>
>
>

 - sportszeru biciklis.mpg


ATEs is incorrect.  There should not be a specialist in my group.

D

Shari Mao
03/20/2000 04:43 PM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: 1497

Daren,

ATEs shows that your team has one specialist for 1497 in January and
February.  Please let me know if ATEs is incorrect for the month of January
and February.  If there is a specialist in your team, we have not received a
survey from this person.  This lack of information prevents your expenses
from being 100% allocated out to the commercial teams.  Please fill out the
following survey and return it to me ASAP.  If you have any questions please
call me at 3-3859.

Thanks,
Shari


Attached are draft of more of the exhibits for discussion purposes.

See you tomorrow,

Kay


Please note that I will be leaving Enron as of March 23,2001.  Please send
future e-mails regarding
Devon changes to Kathy Kelly and Clarissa Garcia, as well as the schedulers
that you are already sending
changes too.  They will coordinate all future Devon inquiries and changes.

If there are questions before then, please call me at 713-853-6357

Thanks,
Beverly Beaty


Can you find the gas daily article from Yesterday ( related to DWR purchse practices ) and e-mail or fax to jeff please.

Thanks, BT

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 10:17 AM
To:	Tycholiz, Barry
Subject:	RE: DWR - Gas Daily

Could you forward the gas daily article?  Thanks.

Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tycholiz, Barry
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 8:50 AM
To:	Dasovich, Jeff
Subject:	DWR - Gas Daily

Jeff, Gas Daily has an article on DWR activities for purchasing gas.... do you know Pete Garris and is he the guy we want to get together with... or is Balwin's co. going to carry the ball. I remain unclear as to who actually is doing the gas buying..

Further to our conversation of last week... let's meet with these guys soonest.

BT


What is your price for a MB Quart QM218.61Q?

DG


Notice No. 02-35
February 5, 2002

TO:		All NYMEX Division Members/Member Firms
		All NYMEX Division Clearing Members
		All NYMEX Division Floor Traders
		All NYMEX Division Operations Managers

FROM:	George Henderson, Vice President

RE:		Options Expiration Operational Procedures for the Trading
		Floor and Clearing Members - Revised Hours
________________________________________________________________

The expiration date for the March 2002 options contract for Brent-WTI (BWH2)
and Brent Crude Oil (OSH2) is Monday, February 11, 2002.

	GENERAL OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES

All Clearing Members and Qualified Floor Traders that carried an options
position as of the close of business day prior to the expiration day, or
engaged in trading activity on Expiration Day in the expiring options
contract will be required to have a knowledgeable, duly authorized
representative present at their normal work station promptly at 4:40 p.m.
until released by the Exchange staff as specified below.  All adjustments
and/or corrections, must be accompanied by relevant supporting documentation
prior to being incorporated into expiration processing, in essence making
the expiration processing an extension of the afternoon trade resolution
procedures.  All input to the NYMEX Clearing Department will conclude no
later than 30 minutes after floor representatives are released.

Exchange Clearing (299-2110), Floor Trade Processing (299-2068 and 299-2169)
personnel, as well as a representative of the Floor Committee will be
available to assist with the processing of notices of Exercise and
Abandonment, position transfers, trade corrections and other questions or
problems you may have.

CLEARING DEPARTMENT OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES

The Option Expiration process is a screen based process for which all
information is provided on the screens on C21 terminals. No Option
Expiration Reports will be provided. The following screens will assist you
through the Option Expiration process:

MEMBER TRADE INQUIRY
Contains real-time top day trade information, trade information for the
previous 4 business days and trades adjusted for the previous 4 business
days by adjustment date.

SINGLE POSITION MAINTENANCE
Contains a real-time snapshot for each option series from the start of day
position to the projected end of day position.

REVIEW ACCEPT REJECT TRANSFERS
Contains all trade and position transfers TO your firm and the status of
each transfer.

REVIEW SUBMITTED TRANSFERS
Contains all trade and position transfer FROM your firm and the status of
each transfer.

EXERCISE NOTICE SUBMISSION
Contains your available long position and an input field to enter the number
of long positions you wish to exercise.

DO NOT EXERCISE SUBMISSION
Contains your available long position and an input field to enter the number
of long positions you wish to abandon.

POSITION CHANGE SUBMISSION
PCS may be submitted either by manual input or by electronic transmission.
Any PCS input on a Clearing 21 terminal will be the input processed by the
system.  This input may be made at any time prior to 6:45 p.m.  Any PCS
input via transmission for that contract series will be disregarded.

ALL POSITIONS ARE DEEMED FINAL
Upon completion of all PCS input, all positions will be deemed final.

EXERCISE/ASSIGNMENT INFORMATION
Will be available to you on the Single Position Maintenance window by
contract series or the Assignment List window which contains all your
Assignments on one window. You will be notified of its availability by C21
E-Mail and by Fast Facts. This should occur within 1 hour of the last PCS
input.

All Clearing Members are required to have an authorized representative(s) at
their C21 workstations in preparation for any communication during the
expiration process.

FAST FACTS
Clearing Members should call the Fast Facts information service 301-4871,
access code 700 for event messages advising Members of the event status.

E-MAIL
Clearing Members should read their C21 E-Mail messages immediately to be
aware of event status.

The standard event Fast Facts and/or E-Mail messages and the sequence in
which they will be announced are:

STANDARD EVENT			APPROXIMATE TIME		  USUAL	FAST
FACTS(F)
  MESSAGES				   OF MESSAGE		EVENT TIME
E-MAIL    (E)
					  AVAILABILITY
BOTH      (B)

Announce Out-of-the    			 4:45PM		 4:45PM		F
Money Exercise and In-the-Money
Do Not Exercise Submissions

Announce Final Input to C21		 6:30PM		 6:45PM		E
Cutoff Time

All positions are deemed final	 7:00PM		 7:00PM		F

Announce Exercise/Assignment		 7:30PM		 7:30PM		B
Information Available on the Single
Position Maintenance Windows

All Report Distribution is		10:00PM		10:00PM		F
completed

The times appearing in the Usual Event Time column are based on normal
operational conditions and could vary.

If you have any questions concerning these procedures, please contact
Anthony Di Benedetto at 299-2152 or John Ramos at 299-2142 prior to the
expiration date.

 <<EXPFORMSPEC.XLS>>

 - EXPFORMSPEC.XLS


Suzanne Brown@ECT
12/11/2000 04:08 PM
To: Laurie Miller/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: Correlation Analysis

Laurie, can you help witt this? thanks.

From: Steven J Kean@ENRON on 12/11/2000 09:43 AM
To: Suzanne Brown/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Correlation Analysis

It's a little hard to tell precise numbers from the charts so I need a "call
out" number from the charts ... specifically,what happened to microsoft's
turnover rate for how much stock decline -- eg did it go up 33% (from 9% to
12%) for "x" decline in the stock price?

	Suzanne Brown@ECT
	12/07/2000 11:39 AM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Cindy Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Correlation Analysis


Karen, unfortunately, Jeff will be unable to review this prior to release;
however, I noticed that Joe Hirko is listed as "chairman and CEO."  It is my
understanding that he is "CEO" only and does not carry the "chairman" title.
You might want to double-check.  Thanks, SRS

Karen Denne
07/12/2000 12:00 PM
To: Kenneth Lay/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joseph W
Sutton/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Mark
Koenig/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Paula Rieker/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rex
Rogers/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Shelly Mansfield/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications

Subject: EBS European Expansion Press Release

The attached press release announcing EBS's expansion into Europe is
scheduled to be issued in London on Thursday.  If you have any questions or
comments, please let me know by 5 p.m. today.

Thank you.
kd


The #1 customer management magazine focused on the energy industry is accepting advertising space reservations for their highly anticipated "Executive Guide to Providers of Customer Management Services" issue.  Gain added exposure for your marketing message by being a part of this once-a-year issue, which will be kept as a reference for buying decisions throughout the year.

Now is your chance to take part in the evolution of
                     Fortnightly's Energy Customer Management. What started out as single-topic supplements three years ago has evolved into six stand-alone issues that provide the business and technology intelligence needed to create strategies for effective customer management for energy companies.  And thanks to the hard work of our circulation staff, over 17,000 professionals with specific interest in this field will be receiving it, along with your advertising message.

Bonus Distribution

                    In addition to reaching our respected audience this single issue will receive added distribution at the following industry events:

NRECA Annual Meeting - March 6-13

GasMart/Power 2002 - March 19-21

e-ProCom - March 19-21

NEMA Annual Meeting - April 1-2

AGA/EEI Customer Service Conference - April 21-24

Metering/CIS/Billings Americas 2002 - April 29-May 1

Written by Editor Regina Johnson, Managing Editor Brad Wolverton, and other seasoned industry experts this issue will be a blockbuster.  Take a look at these in-depth articles:

                    ECM Exclusive

                    Tom Peters on Energy Branding

                    Whether you're the incumbent utility or a new entrant, brand matters. Business guru and renowned author Tom Peters discusses how to create a lasting brand, who comes closest in the energy industry, and how energy deregulation poses branding challenges.

                    Energy Strategy

                    Diversify and Conquer

                    More than ever, energy companies are branching out with new business lines and offerings to generate new revenues. Which of these innovative partnerships and customer offerings are proving most successful?

                    Customer Service

                    Satisfaction Benchmarking: Turn Findings Into Action

                    Research firm Metrix Matrix presents findings of its survey on how utilities benchmark customer satisfaction. How do your energy company's practices compare? And how do you turn satisfaction ratings and comments into action items to improve service?

                    Technology Play

                    Demand Buyback: Will Customers Bite?

                    As demand-response programs become an essential part of balancing power supply and demand, energy suppliers are sweetening the deal with cash incentives for customers. Where does curtailment-for-pay fit into the portfolio of demand-response offerings, and what factors should go into designing these load buyback programs?

                    Special Section

                    Executive Guide to Providers of Customer Management Services

                    Overwhelmed by the vast selection of customer care solutions? Check out ECM's annual guide, and search the energy strategy consultants and vendors by their services, technologies and major clients. Don't miss the industry's most comprehensive directory.

                    With this incredible line-up, premium positions are sure to go fast.  Call your account executive today to get all the issue details.  Deadlines are fast approaching so call today.

Space reservation deadline is February 14th.

  Ad materials due February 22nd.

                          Northeast
                            & Midwest

                            Joseph 	Paparello

                            703-847-7759

                            paparello@pur.com
                          West
                            & South

                            Andres Mancini

                            703-847-7735

                            mancini@pur.com

This message is brought to you as a registered user of Energy Central.
                    If you wish to discontinue

 receiving this type of message, reply to this message with 'Stop Ads' in the subject of your message.


Several of the Enron Corp. Research Team would like for you to come
in for an interview.  They are:

Vince Kaminski    Managing Director
Stinson Gibner    Vice President
Maureen Raymond-Castaneda  Director

Please give me some dates and times of your availability during the rest
of January and I will try to coordinate them with our schedule.

Looking forward to hearing from you soon.

Regards,

Shirley Crenshaw
Adminsitrative Coordinator
Enron Research Group
713/852-5290
email:  Shirley.Crenshaw@enron.com


(See attached file: rigs042202.pdf)

This message and any attachments (the "message") is
intended solely for the addressees and is confidential.
If you receive this message in error, please delete it and
immediately notify the sender. Any use not in accord with
its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure, either whole
or partial, is prohibited except formal approval. The internet
can not guarantee the integrity of this message.
BNP PARIBAS (and its subsidiaries) shall (will) not
therefore be liable for the message if modified.

                ---------------------------------------------

Ce message et toutes les pieces jointes (ci-apres le
"message") sont etablis a l'intention exclusive de ses
destinataires et sont confidentiels. Si vous recevez ce
message par erreur, merci de le detruire et d'en avertir
immediatement l'expediteur. Toute utilisation de ce
message non conforme a sa destination, toute diffusion
ou toute publication, totale ou partielle, est interdite, sauf
autorisation expresse. L'internet ne permettant pas
d'assurer l'integrite de ce message, BNP PARIBAS (et ses
filiales) decline(nt) toute responsabilite au titre de ce
message, dans l'hypothese ou il aurait ete modifie.


-----Original Message-----
From:  Funk, Brenda L.
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 11:35 AM
To: Ephross, Joel
Cc: Shackleton, Sara
Subject: RE: Raptor 2 - Sale of CEG/RioGas

Just an update... I spoke with V&E this morning and the sale has been put on
hold.  The negotiations broke down last week and, with the holiday, there has
been no further progress.

I'll let you know when I get an update.

Thanks,
B

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Ephross, Joel
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 11:31 AM
To: Shackleton, Sara; Funk, Brenda L.
Subject: FW: Raptor 2 - Sale of CEG/RioGas

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Baker, Ron
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 9:12 AM
To: Siurek, Ryan; McKean, George; McKillop, Gordon; Ephross, Joel
Subject: Raptor 2 - Sale of CEG/RioGas

FYI
I was just notified that the sale of CEG and RioGas which are hedged in
Raptor 2 will likely close next week.  Current estimates indicate that the
loss on the sale will be around $30MM.  It is expected that the sale of the
one remaining South American LDC will result in gains that will more than
offset this loss.  Obviously, those expectations can change, but I wanted to
keep everyone informed on this.

Ryan - This expected realized loss is exactly the situation which most
concerned us in the meeting with Patti this week.  Is there anything we can
do to push them towards resolving that timing of realized losses is
irrelevent, and this is not an issue?


Is anyone with type O blood (either + or -) able to donate Platelets for
Michael today?  Sorry for the short notice, but the two people who were
going to do it today "bailed" for various reasons.

If you're able to donate today, please call my wife, Bev, at 713 972-6840.

Thanks.

Bob

Bob Joyce
Kvaerner Process
7909 Parkwood Circle Drive
Houston, TX 77036
(713) 995-2137
(713) 270-3652 -- Fax
bob.joyce@kvaerner.com <mailto:bob.joyce@kvaerner.com>

This electronic message transmission and any attachments contain information
from the Kvaerner Process Legal Department that may be confidential and/or
privileged.  It is intended solely for the addressee(s) above, and use by
any other party is not authorized.  If you are not an intended recipient,
any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this
information is prohibited.  If you have received this transmission in error,
please notify the sender immediately by using the "reply" feature or  by
telephone, and then delete this message and any attachments.  Thank you.


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 12/01/2000
12:46 PM ---------------------------

Phillip M Love
11/30/2000 01:54 PM
To: Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jimmy Simien/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Victor
Guggenheim/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: NEW elf bowling!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 11/30/2000
01:53 PM ---------------------------

Bruce Mills@ENRON
11/30/2000 11:24 AM
To: Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: NEW elf bowling!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

---------------------- Forwarded by Bruce Mills/Corp/Enron on 11/30/2000
11:22 AM ---------------------------

"Cantu, Veronica" <vcantu@bcm.tmc.edu> on 11/30/2000 11:05:54 AM
To: "'Adrian Cantu'" <acantu@hotmail.com>, "'Amy_Copes@Dell.com'"
<Amy_Copes@Dell.com>, "'Bruce.Mills@enron.com'" <Bruce.Mills@enron.com>,
"'elena morales'" <elena_morales@excite.com>, "'Francisco Sanchez'"
<hcdpsecretary@hotmail.com>, "'Gina.Kane@AACN.org'" <Gina.Kane@AACN.org>,
"'Kristine Best'" <kristinebest@hotmail.com>, "Liau, Katherine"
<Kliau@www.urol.bcm.tmc.edu>
cc:

Subject: FW: NEW elf bowling!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

-----Original Message-----
From: Jonietz, Laurie
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 10:38 AM
To: 'ludmilla'; 'andrea'; Coleman, Angela; Cantu, Veronica; Riezner, Melanie
Subject: NEW elf bowling!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

i'm too dumb to figure this version out.  maybe it would help if i read the
rules.....

 - elves2.exe


Frank:
I spoke with her attorney yesterday and believe that I addressed her concerns
with the ETA, GTC and Password Application forms.  She is going to add
language to the Password Application that makes it clear that any GTC is
considered to be "signed" and "in writing" if they are required by the
Website to click on it.  Her main concern given the fact that we now have a
Master in place with them is that they are not asked to accept the terms of a
GTC and I assured her that so long as she has a Master in place that covers
the product that she wants to trade that they will not be asked to accept a
GTC.  Anyway, putting this language in the PA seemed to make her feel
better.  Once you receive the PA from her why don't you fax it to me  and I
will let you know if it is acceptable.

Also, as I discussed with Stephanie yesterday, they wanted to do a "test" run
on the Website to check to make sure that they would not be asked to accept a
GTC.  I told her that the only way to do this would be to click on a product
description once they get their password.  I understand that you and Tana
will coordinate with each other when the time comes to make sure that the
ISDA Master that they executed gets coded into the Website at the proper time
so that when they do click on a product description, no GTC appears.

Please call me if you have any questions.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com


Attached for your review are materials for the
December 19,2000 ERCOT Board meeting.

Best regards,

Shari Heino
ERCOT

 - Ag001219.doc
 - Bd001025.doc
 - Bd001121.doc
 - BOD Responsibilities.doc
 - Fee Increase Intervenors12.19.00.doc
 - PIP_Master_List 121200.xls
 - Protocols supplental PUCT filing12.19.00.doc
 - RUG120600Results.doc


Profile Manager also has this counterparty on transact for other European
financial products.  Are we really trading those products, because I don't
think we should be ...?


For the name changes the legal names and ERMS SN have been updated on GCP.

 I did receive the Kinder Morgan, Inc. merger document so was able to take
care of that this time around. Note in particular my comments regarding the
Kinder Morgan and EniChem Americas, Inc. merger and name changes. Call if
there are questions.