NETWORK WORLD NEWSLETTER: NEAL WEINBERG on
PRODUCT REVIEWS
01/10/02
Today's focus: Wireless LAN security, Part 2

Dear Wincenty Kaminski,

In this issue:

* 3Com, Avaya offer strong wireless LAN security products
* Links related to Network World product reviews
* Featured reader resource
____________________________________________________________
This newsletter sponsored by
Lucent Technologies

CPE-based IP Services
Are you ready to transform your business with IP Services?
Service Providers and enterprises can tailor their IP services-
IP VPN, QoS, mobile IP, bandwidth management-with Lucent's
Access Point
 IP services routers.  And these IP services can
be delivered with superior price/performance at the lowest
operation management costs today.
http://syndication.solutioncentral.com/to.asp?id=211

____________________________________________________________
PRODUCT INFO IN ONE CONVENIENT LOCATION!

Heard about a new product launch? Curious to find out if the
features and benefits of this new product will meet your
critical business needs? Network World Fusion's Product Central
section includes all the info you need to make informed
decision about new products and also includes a product finder
function. Check it out at
http://nww1.com/go/ad216.html

____________________________________________________________
Today's focus: Wireless LAN security, Part 2

By Neal Weinberg

In our review of wireless LAN security solutions, we tested
3Com's Access Point 6000, Avaya's Access Server 1, Cisco's
Aironet 350 access point and Access Control Server, and
Colubris' CN1000. Last time, we looked at the Cisco and
Colubris products. This time, we check out 3Com's and Avaya's
wares.

3Com's Access Point 6000 is a well-designed product. It
features a two-position wireless access point with a flip
antenna as well as a retractable X-Jack antenna on its wireless
network interface card (NIC). The X-Jack lets you store the
antenna in the NIC when not in use, keeping it in your laptop
during transportation.

3Com's Dynamic Security Link technology is similar to Cisco's
Lightweight Extensive Authentication Protocol (LEAP). One
benefit of Dynamic Security Link is that it increases the
number of simultaneous users from 65 to 255.

Furthermore, you don't have to manually enter the 128-bit keys.
The software automatically generates new keys and distributes
them to the client each session. This is great for encryption,
but you still need to provide for authentication.

It took only 60 seconds to set up the access point, but
implementing the full range of security took a while longer.
3Com's browser-based Configuration Management System was
excellent, and the HTML-based documentation was complete and
well organized. In all, 3Com's product had some neat
technology.

Avaya's wireless NIC looked familiar and that's because it was.
It seems that both Colubris and Avaya use NICs from Orinoco.
But Avaya's solution goes far beyond just the NIC.

Avaya's Access Server 1 is a slick tool for managing corporate-
level wireless security. It includes Remote Authentication Dial
In User Server software that runs on any workstation plugged
into the hard-wired LAN. And it employs automatic key
generation and distribution.

Avaya's documentation was very good, with plenty of room set
aside in the form of tables to record the system parameters
administrators in large corporate environments should never
commit to memory.

The Access Server manager provides the full range of management
and diagnostic utilities you'd expect from a top-of-the-line
corporate offering.

For the full report, go to
http://www.nwfusion.com/reviews/2001/1217rev.html

_______________________________________________________________
To contact Neal Weinberg:

Neal Weinberg is features editor at Network World, in charge
of product reviews, Buyer's Guides, technology primers,
how-tos, issue-oriented feature stories and the Technology
Insider series. You can reach him at mailto:nweinber@nww.com.
_______________________________________________________________
Promote your services and generate qualified leads!  Register
on Buy IT, NW Fusion's Vendor Directory and RFP Center.  It's
cost-effective and eliminates the headaches of finding new
business.  List your company today and access millions of
dollars in RFPs posted by active buyers.  Go to NW Fusion now!
http://www.nwfusion.newmediary.com/091201nwwprovnwltr1
_______________________________________________________________
RELATED LINKS

Researchers uncover wireless security flaws
IDG News Service, 02/05/01
http://www.nwfusion.com/news/2001/0205wireless.html

Microsoft, Cisco, others team on wireless security
IDG News Service, 03/27/01
http://www.nwfusion.com/net.worker/news/2001/0327mscisco.html

The archive for Reviews is:
http://www.nwfusion.com/reviews/index.html
______________________________________________________________
FEATURED READER RESOURCE

Network World Fusion's Net.Worker site

Whether your company is growing larger or scaling back,
corporate managers are looking for ways to cut costs while
retaining and recruiting star employees. One smart solution -
at least on paper - is to let some employees work from home.
Network World's Net.Worker Web site bridges the gap between the
telework concept and the hardware, software and services needed
to make it happen. We bring you news and reviews, sound advice
and keen insight into the technologies and solutions you need
to manage a remote and mobile workforce.
Visit http://www.nwfusion.com/net.worker/index.html
_______________________________________________________________
May We Send You a Free Print Subscription?
You've got the technology snapshot of your choice delivered
at your fingertips each day. Now, extend your knowledge by
receiving 51 FREE issues to our print publication. Apply
today at http://www.nwwsubscribe.com/nl
______________________________________________________________
SUBSCRIPTION SERVICES

To subscribe or unsubscribe to any Network World e-mail
newsletters, go to:
http://www.nwwsubscribe.com/news/scripts/notprinteditnews.asp

To unsubscribe from promotional e-mail go to:
http://www.nwwsubscribe.com/ep

To change your e-mail address, go to:
http://www.nwwsubscribe.com/news/scripts/changeemail.asp

Subscription questions? Contact Customer Service by replying to
this message.

Have editorial comments? Write Jeff Caruso, Newsletter Editor,
at: mailto:jcaruso@nww.com

For advertising information, write Jamie Kalbach, Director of
Online Sales, at: mailto:jkalbach@nww.com

Copyright Network World, Inc., 2002

------------------------
This message was sent to:  vkamins@enron.com


The attached press release announcing a gas sales agreement between Metgas
and RCF was reviewed and approved in March, but the release was postponed.
The GSA is expected to be signed next week, and we would like to issue the
release in Mumbai.  If you have any questions or comments, please let me know
by Monday, June 12.

Thank you.
kd
---------------------- Forwarded by Karen Denne/Corp/Enron on 06/07/2000
09:28 PM ---------------------------
From: John Ambler@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 06/07/2000 03:06 PM
To: Mark Palmer@ENRON
cc: Karen Denne@ENRON

Subject: Signing of GSA between Metgas and RCF - Press Release / Q&As

Mark,

You may recall that the GSA between Metgas and RCF, a Govt. of India owned
fertilizer company, was postponed at the last moment in March (please refer
to below e-mail). The Metgas marketing team is cautiously optimistic that the
GSA could now be signed next week, perhaps June 14.  An India only press
release was approved by the India team and Corp. in March but as that was 10
weeks ago,  I wanted to ensure that this action is still approved.   Please
let me know if you have any questions."

Thanks,

John

---------------------- Forwarded by Johan Zaayman/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
06/01/2000 03:09 PM ---------------------------

Johan Zaayman
03/22/2000 05:31 PM
To: Steven J Kean@EES, Mark Koenig@ENRON, Paula Rieker@ENRON, Peter
Berger@ECT, Mark Palmer@ENRON
cc: Kelly Kimberly/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Signing of GSAs with RCF and Ispat during President Clinton's visit
to India - Press Releases

Please be advised that we will not be signing the GSA with RCF this week. The
signing had been planned for Thursday in New Delhi but apparently the
Chairman of RCF is ill and his Board could not meet in time to give final
approval to the deal. We will now sign at a later date.

We are still on track to sign the GSA with Ispat on Friday evening in Mumbai.
The Shareholders Agreement will also be signed but the PPA will follow
several days later. Only a press release for the Ispat deal will therefore be
released on Friday, in India only.

I will keep you informed of any new developments.

Thanks,

Johan


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 03/27/2001
09:26 AM ---------------------------
From: Veronica Espinoza/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/27/2001 08:25 AM
To: Janie Aguayo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diane Anderson/NA/Enron@Enron, Derek
Bailey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jean Bell/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Patricia Boulanger/CAL/ECT@ECT, Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julie
Brewer/NA/Enron@Enron, Lesli Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate, Celeste
Cisneros/NA/Enron@Enron, Sharon Crawford/CAL/ECT@ECT, Richard
Deming/NA/Enron@Enron, Russell Diamond/ENRON@enronXgate, Cindy
Feldman/CAL/ECT@ECT, Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Veronica
Gonzalez/ENRON@enronXgate, Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Walter
Guidroz/ENRON@enronXgate, Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam
Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, Errol
McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Nidia Mendoza/ENRON@enronXgate, Tom
Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Bianca Ornelas/NA/Enron@Enron, Leslie
Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Dianne Seib/CAL/ECT@ECT,
Linda Sietzema/CAL/ECT@ECT, Kim S Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ellen
Wallumrod/NA/Enron@ENRON, Melinda Whalen/CAL/ECT@ECT, Tiffany
Williams/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Credit Report--3/27/01


Rod - see me comment directly to Dan below.
FYI - We will probably book the income in December since the transaction was
consummated in a 24hour period in December.  (I may need to bring a more
reality/pragmatic focus into our accounting theory personnel).
OK?

---------------------- Forwarded by James Saunders/FGT/Enron on 12/08/2000
07:31 AM ---------------------------

James Saunders
12/08/2000 07:29 AM
To: Dan Fancler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: 2002 TW Fuel Sales Trade Confirmation

If the deal was closed out -which it was; I would think the accounting would
follow.

	From:  Dan Fancler                           12/08/2000 07:27 AM

To: Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@Enron
cc: Bob Chandler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, James Saunders/FGT/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: 2002 TW Fuel Sales Trade Confirmation

TW purchased a swap, exchanged a floating 2002 position for a fixed price.
It was purchased at current market so there is no profit until the 2002 strip
changes in value.  Since this derivative has been designated as a hedge of
2002 all changes in market value are deferred in OCI (effective 1/1/01).

Dan

Rod Hayslett

12/08/2000 06:42 AM
To: Bob Chandler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: James Saunders/FGT/Enron@Enron, Dan Fancler/ET&S/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: 2002 TW Fuel Sales Trade Confirmation

So they sold it, at a profit, now how do we book it?

	From:  Bob Chandler                           12/07/2000 08:42 AM

To: James Saunders/FGT/Enron@Enron
cc: Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Dan Fancler/ET&S/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: 2002 TW Fuel Sales Trade Confirmation

It represents a hedge of 2002 forecasted sales of TW over-retained
fuel/unaccounted for volumes.  The swap will be initially recorded in January
2001 at then market value as a FAS 133 implementation adjustment (any value
at 1/1/2001 will go to income as an item of "change in accounting
principles").   Monthly fluctuations in the value of the swap will be marked
to market with the income effect deferred in Other Comprehensive Income until
the hedged item (the physical sale) occurs.  The the deferred income will be
undeferred and brought to income to offset the income/loss from the hedged
transaction.

James Saunders
12/07/2000 08:28 AM
To: Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON
cc: Bob Chandler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: 2002 TW Fuel Sales Trade Confirmation

doesn't it need to be marked to market?

Rod Hayslett

12/07/2000 08:24 AM
To: James Saunders/FGT/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: 2002 TW Fuel Sales Trade Confirmation

This is for 2002.

James Saunders
12/07/2000 08:22 AM
To: Bob Chandler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: 2002 TW Fuel Sales Trade Confirmation

We sold short at $4.50?
That would mean we're already under water?


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 01/12/2001
04:07 PM ---------------------------

"Julie" <julie@lacimagroup.com> on 01/11/2001 02:07:20 PM
Please respond to "Julie" <julie@lacimagroup.com>
To: "VinceJKaminski" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc: <Shirley.Crenshaw@enron.com>
Subject: update on energy book

Vince,
?
Just to let you know, the books will be shipped to both you and Rice
University tomorrow by express mail, which means the books should arrive
within  5 days (depending on customs).
?
Rice has purchased 25 books, and I informed them that if they don't sell
them all, we will?credit their account?with the amount of unsold  copies.?
I've asked them to?give you?any extra copies instead of  returning them.
?
Please find attached the invoice for the 50 books.
?
Thanks again, and if you need anything further, please let me know.
?
Julie
 - Enron 224_10_01_01.doc


I need to pick up a kicker for this week.
I would like to pick up David Akers - Eagles and drop Richard Huntley -
Steelers

If David is not there;
I would like to pick up Tim Seder - Cowboys and drop Richard Huntley -
Steelers


Steve-  Below is the wire transfer information needed to pay the November bill.

Paul-  Also attached are blank enabling agreements needed for transmission.  Mark Hackney said the turn around for this can be 1 to 2 days and with credit established he can waive the deposits.

Diana

-----Original Message-----
From: Hackney, Mark W(Z39911) [mailto:Mark.Hackney@aps.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 8:39 AM
To: Scholtes, Diana
Subject: Wire instructions and Applications

wire transfer information

ABA # 121000248
Well Fargo Bank
707 Wilshire Blvd.
LA, CA  90017
Acct # 4159540921

Applications for new:

The POR/POD stuff is not needed to be specific,  just as determined at time
of OASIS request.

 <<Firm PtP Transmission Service Application Form.doc>>  <<NonFirm PtP
Transmission Service Application Form.doc>>

Mark W. Hackney
Section Leader
Pre and Real-time Transmission Scheduling, AGC Operations
APS OATT Administration
Arizona Public Service Company
602.250.1128 - Office
602.908.1423 - Cell
602.250.1155 - Fax
mailto:Mark.Hackney@aps.com


Dan,

This does not make sense to me, since we have had previous unloadings that have been less than perfect, other Matthew unloadings, and this is the first I am hearing of a demurrage claim.  Please get with Larry and have a full report prepared on the problem we had and the merits of the claim.  I want to understand why we are now getting a claim and have us take steps to ensure that demurrage claims do not become routine.

Rick

Dan Masters@ECT
04/09/2001 03:36 PM
To:	Rick Sierra/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:	Paul Y'Barbo/NA/Enron@Enron@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Larry Snyder@EES@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject:	Re: Ship Demurrage Claim

Rick-
Since this is not a claim and simply a letter of protest, no response is required by us nor would one be expected of us by Cabot or the ship.  Please see my email from earlier for further information or give me a call when you get a chance.

Dan

Rick Sierra@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
04/09/2001 03:16 PM
To:	Dan Masters@ect
cc:	Paul Y'Barbo/NA/Enron@Enron, Larry Snyder@EES
Subject:	Ship Demurrage Claim

Dan,

Victor and I did discuss the demurrage claim.  As I understand the facts, this does not appear to be a valid claim.

I am looking to your group to evaluate the merits of the claim.  If you conclude that the claim is valid, please prepare memo to Victor with copy to me, explaning why the claim is valid.  If on the other hand, you conclude the claim is not valid, then please prepare a letter to Cabot ( for Victor's signature) explaning why the claim is not valid.

Rick

<Embedded StdOleLink>


Ellen:  per our earlier conversation, I have faxed comments to both
companies, to the attention of their "negotiators" with whom I spoke earlier
this morning.  I will call in the morning to discuss and I hope we can
finalize and fax signature tomorrow.

Thanks.  Sara


Please send me your user id's
---------------------- Forwarded by Ina Rangel/HOU/ECT on 04/26/2001 05:27 PM
---------------------------
From: Amanda Huble/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/24/2001 09:05 AM
To: Ina Rangel/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: User Ids

Do you happen to have the user ids for the following people?  I have a list
that you sent me before, but these people were not on there.  The reason for
this is security for the site.

Vicki Versen
Scott Hendrickson
Dutch Quigley
John Griffith
Matt Lenhart
steve South
Susan Scott
Chris Figueroa
Eric Feitler
Mog Heu
Sheetal Patel

Thank you,

Amanda K. Huble
Gas Fundamentals
Phone: (713) 853-4384
Pager: (877) 482-0772
Fax: (713) 646-8453


FYI.  Thanks. Lynn

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Buchanan, John
Sent:	Wednesday, October 03, 2001 10:02 AM
To:	Blair, Lynn; Winters, Ricki; Garcia, Ava; Kowalke, Terry
Subject:	NNG Card List by Team

See the attached for the NNG Card list by team. SC= SouthCentral Team N=North team and SC-N means both claim the customer.

John Buchanan


I know this is a duplicate email for some.  I am resending this email using a
more complete list of people.

Thanks.

_______________________________________________

Please see the attached memo.


your wife isn't on this list.  you don't need to lie about going there.


553809 - changed to APB
553810 - changed to APB

554166 - changed to BP Energy Co.

Jeff is entering the rest of his deals right now.

Kate

Stephanie Piwetz   03/19/2001 02:26 PM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Kerri Thompson/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Checkout 3/19/01

Kate-

Apb checkout     Badeer
missing deals:   Enron Buys Relaint 290.00 Apr SP15 on peak  25 mws believe
deal 553809.01, need to ch bro to apb
  Enron Sells Reliant 310.00 Apr NP15 on peak 25 mws believe deal 553810.01,
need to ch bro to apb

554166.01 Mallory, please ch Cp name to BP Energy Co

Missing Jeff Richter trades:
Enron Buys PGET
April 25 mws SP15   290.00

Enron Buys BP Energy
3/21-3/31  50 mws
SP15   330.00


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Travers, Elise
> Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 4:02 PM
> To: Bob and Caterina (E-mail); Chris Liu (E-mail); Elite Kedan (E-mail);
> Gloria Guillo (E-mail); Kim Kelly (E-mail); Laurie Butler (E-mail); Liane
> Williams (E-mail); Mark Travers (E-mail); Mom Travers (E-mail); Paul
> Soulellis (E-mail); Vera Dragicevich (E-mail); Grace Tejada (E-mail); Lev
> Zeitlin (E-mail 2); Moyler, Joy; Rothwell, Amanda; Marcus, Sarah; Eggert,
> Jeffrey; Hulka, John; Lonn, Patrick; Wong, Linda; Agus, Jennifer; Brown,
> Donald; Tuck, Gregory; Brock, Alex; Farrar, Rick; 'msuomi@earthlink.net';
> 'grinner61@mindspring.com'; Jeff Travers (E-mail 2); Steven, Leslie; Mack,
> Nancy
> Subject: NEA, NPR, PBS petition
>
> On NPR's Morning Edition last week, Nina Totenberg
> said that if the Supreme Court supports Congress, it
> is in effect the end of the National Public Radio
> NPR), NEA & the Public Broadcasting SystemPBS).
> PBS, NPR and the arts are facing major cutbacks in
> funding.
>
> In spite of the efforts of each station to reduce
> spending costs and streamline their services, some
> government officials believe that the funding
> currently going to these programs is too large a
> portion of funding for something which is seen as not
> worthwhile.
>
> Currently, taxes from the general public for PBS equal
> $1.12 per person peryear, and the National Endowment
> for the Arts equals $. 64 a year.
>
> A January 1995 CNN/USA Today/Gallup poll indicated
> that 76% of Americans wish to keep funding for PBS,
> third only to national defense and law enforcement as
> the most valuable programs for federal funding. The
> Senate and House appropriations committees each have
> 13 subcommittees with jurisdiction over many programs
> and agencies.
>
> Each subcommittee passes its own appropriation bill.
> The goal each year is to have each bill signed by the
> beginning of the fiscalyear, which is October 1. The
> only way that our representatives can be aware of the
> base of support for PBS and funding for these types of
> programs is by making our voices heard.
>
> Please add your name to this list and forward it to
> friends who believe in what this stands for. This list
> will be forwarded to the President of the United
> States and the Vice President of the United States.
>
> This petition is being passed around the Internet.
> Please add your name to it so that funding can be
> maintained for the NEA, NPR &PBS.
>
> HOW TO SIGN & FORWARD: IT'S EASY: Please keep this
> petitionrolling. Do not reply to me. Please sign and
> forward to others to sign. If you prefer not to sign,
> please send to the e-mail address indicated below.
>
> DON'T WORRY ABOUT DUPLICATES. This is being forwarded
> to several people at once to add their names to the
> petition. It won't matter if many people receive the
> same list as the names are being managed.This is for
> anyone who thinks NPR/PBS is a worthwhile
> expenditureof $1.12/year of their taxes, a petition
> follows.
>
> If you sign, please forward on to others. If not,
> please don't kill it--send it to the email address
> listed here:
>
>  wein2688@blue.univnorthco.eduorkubi7975@blue.univnorthco.edu
> <mailto:wein2688@blue.univnorthco.eduorkubi7975@blue.univnorthco.edu>
>
>  <mailto:wein2688@blue.univnorthco.eduorkubi7975@blue.univnorthco.edu>
>
>
> NOTE: If you happen to be the 150th, 200th, 250th,
> etc., signer of this petition, please forward a copy to:
>
> wein2688@blue.univnorthco.edu <mailto:wein2688@blue.univnorthco.edu>
>
> < <mailto:wein2688@blue.univnorthco.edu>>
>
> This way we can keep track of the lists and organize them.
>
> Forward this to everyone you know, and help us to keep
> these programs alive.
>
> Thank you!
>
> NOTE: It is preferable that you SELECT (highlight) the
> entirety of this letter and then COPY it into a new
> outgoing message, rather than simply forwarding it. In
> your new outgoing message, add your name to the bottom
> of the list, then send it on. Or if option is
> available,do a SEND AGAIN.
>
> 951) Gary Canner FL 32609
>
> 952) Phyllis Canner FL 32609
>
> 953) Barb Bloomfield
>
> 954) Ken Swift, WI 53703
>
> 955) Carla Hacker, WI 53703
>
> 966) Christine Hall Reichelderfer, WI 53703
>
> 967) Julieanne Ehre, IL 60202
>
> 968) Joelle Ehre, CA 90036
>
> 969) Robin Hessman, MA 02118
>
> 970) Bert Kleinman, CA 90272
>
> 971) Jacqueline Wales, CA 90272
>
> 972) Martin Reubin, CA 90272
>
> 973) Gloria Saltzman, CA 94114
>
> 974) Deborah Gallin, CA 92691
>
> 975) Harry Ratner, CA 92708
>
> 976) Bradley Miller, CA 92618
>
> 977) Dyan Hobday-Brant, CA 92780
>
> 978) Jerry Marble, CA 91007
>
> 979) Don Cloud, CA 91750
>
> 980) Marsha Swayze, CA 95815
>
> 981) Rachel West, CA 95815
>
> 982) Orrin J. Olson, CA 95688
>
> 983) Tri D. Tran, CA 95688
>
> 984) Murray Friedman, CA 94585
>
> 985) Carolyn Marychild, CA 95688
>
> 986) Aim e Dominique, LA 70506
>
> 987) Marie C. Ackermann, FL 33426
>
> 988) Mary L. Starkweather, FL 34491
>
> 989)Don Starkweather, MI 49006
>
> 990) Linda Starkweather, NY 14469
>
> 991) Judith Ellis, NY 14469
>
> 992) Linda Chafin, FL 32308
>
> 993) Kathy Burks, FL 32344
>
> 994) Janice Broda, FL 32963
>
> 995) Chris Lockhart, FL 33437
>
> 996). Daniel F. Austin, FL 33431
>
> 997). Ramaswamy Narayanan, FL 33435
>
> 998). David Binninger, FL 33445
>
> 999). Steve Neuvenheim. CA 90069
>
> 1000) Steven Blaize, CA 90069
>
> 1001) Tracy Halloran, CA 91504
>
> 1002) Bill Halloran, CA 91202
>
> 1003) Bill Schlarb CA 91011
>
> 1004) Tom Irwin, CA 91214
>
> 1005) Darlene Irwin,CA 91214
>
> 1006) Laura Helgren CA 95066
>
> 1007) Chris Steres CA 95062
>
> 1008) Nancy Tara Gasta CA 95062
>
> 1009) Rona Edmunds CA 94114
>
> 1010) Eleanor Vera CA 90069
>
> 1011) Bernice Epstein Ca 90212
>
> 1012) Ellen Lazares, 93551
>
> 1013) Omar Wright, Ca 90066
>
> 1014) Marcella Greening, Ca 90066
>
> 1015) Robert Schwartz, Ca 90066
>
> 1016) Laura Napruszewski OR 97055
>
> 1017) Carolyn Mark, CA 94121
>
> 1018) Sara Newman, VA 22201
>
> 1019) David Newman, VA 22201
>
> 1020) Ruth Walkup, DC 20008
>
> 1021) Susan Girois, PA 19403
>
> 1022) Carol Brown, WA 98101
>
> 1023) Chris Motley, CA 94117
>
> 1024) Susan Cook, AK 99504
>
> 1025) Linda Bunker, CA 95821
>
> 1026) Charles Bunker, CA 95821
>
> 1027) Casey Bunker, NC 27607
>
> 1028) Kenneth Renwick, CA 95372
>
> 1029> Patricia Rowe, CA 95372
>
> 1030> Gregory Falken, CA 95379
>
> 1031) Dottie Barnett, CA 94611
>
> 1032) Elliott Barnett, CA 94611
>
> 1032) Erin Longley, CA 95472
>
> 1033) Stephen Raymond, MA 02129
>
> 1034) Stephen Gross, MA 02478
>
> 1035) Gabriela Romanow, MA 02467
>
> 1036) Mary McFadden, MA 02445
>
> 1037) Lawrence Stifler, MA 02445
>
> 1038) Diane Schmalensee, MA 02467
>
> 1039)Nancy Shaver, VA 22314
>
> 1049)Carter Kuster, NY. 10002
>
> 1050)Willie Cole, N.J. 07803
>
> 1051)Mbewe Escobar, N.J. 07803
>
> 1052)Rirkrit Tiravanija NYC 10009
>
> 1053)Laura Hoptman NYC 10003
>
> 1054)Anne Chu NYC 10003
>
> 1055) Margaret Murray NY 11201
>
> 1056) Janice Guy NY 10014
>
> 1057) Dave Muller CA 90065
>
> 1058) Terry Myers CA 90027
>
> 1059)  Rochelle Feinstein NY  10003
>
> 1060) Jessica Stockholder CT 06517
>
> 1061)  Andrea Zittel
>
> 1062)  Rachel Harrison  Brooklyn,NY 11211
>
> 1063) Cecily Brown NY 10011
>
> 1064) Simone Manwarring Brooklyn, NY 11211
>
> 1065) Elise Travers NY 10003
>
> 1065) Alex Brock NY 12430
>


- KickintheHead.pdf


Sherri,  Homecoming is the Weekend of October 27-29.  I hope Jeff can make
it!

Chuck
________________________________________
   Chuck Paul
   A Closer Look
   Professional Mystery Shopping Company
   770-446-0590
   Email:  Chuck.Paul@A-Closer-Look.com
   http://www.a-closer-look.com

----- Original Message -----
From: <Jeff.Skilling@enron.com>
To: Chuck Paul <chuck.paul@a-closer-look.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2000 10:32 AM
Subject: Re: MS 150/ Homecoming 2000

>
> Mr. Paul,
>
> Jeff asked me to see if I could find out when the Homecoming is taking
> place.  He'd like to be there if the dates work with his schedule.
>
> Thank you,
> Sherri Sera
> Assistant toJeff Skilling
> 713.853.5984
> 713.646.8381 (fax)
>
>
>
>
> "Chuck Paul" <chuck.paul@a-closer-look.com> on 05/02/2000 01:35:32 PM
>
> Please respond to "Chuck Paul" <chuck.paul@a-closer-look.com>
>
> To:   "Jeff Skilling" <jskilli@enron.com>
> cc:
>
> Subject:  MS 150/ Homecoming 2000
>
>
> Jeff,  how was the bike trek to Austin?  Hope you raised LOTS of $$$.
> Great
> job you are doing!  My MS get together is next weekend (May 13th).
>
> Homecoming 2000-be there!  Elvis is having a party for all Beta's (big
25th
> reunion) on Friday night at his house.  The new stadium is supposed to be
> awesome.  Hope you can make it.
>
> Keep in touch,
>
> -kai-
>
> Chuck
> ________________________________________
>    Chuck Paul
>    A Closer Look
>    Professional Mystery Shopping Company
>    770-446-0590
>    Email:  Chuck.Paul@A-Closer-Look.com
>    http://www.a-closer-look.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Thompson, Virginia
Sent:	Wednesday, May 08, 2002 11:40 AM
To:	Rance, Susan; Thompson, Virginia; Cavanaugh, Darren; Emmert, Caroline; Savage, Gordon; Kane, Paul; Tully, Michael; O'Neil, Murray P.; Sheppard, Kathryn; Erwin, Kenton; Gang, Lisa; Sarnowski, Julie
Cc:	Williams, Bill; Slaughter, Jeff G.; Eriksson, Fredrik; Blackburn, Jody; Bruce, James; Nelson, Kourtney; Oh, John; 'joh@aep.com'; 'taperry@aep.com'; 'tngo@aep.com'; 'jwilhite@aep.com'
Subject:	Going away lunch for Susan Rance

All-

  We are having a going away lunch for Susan Rance tomorrow, Thursday May 9, 2002 at the Rock Bottom Brewery.  The reservations are for 11:45 am and under Susan Rance's name.  They have requested to have only one check for the table.

  Please join us in wishing Susan an awesome farewell to sunny San Diego!

  Please let us know if you can make it so we can reserve enough seats.


Charlie,

See attached.

Thanks,
Joe


See cell note on 2/01 Prod.


Sorry you weren't able to join my hunting boondoggle in SoDak!  It was epic.
Lots of birds (the wild variety, not pen raised and tied down like at
Pheasant Haven!)  We saw literally 1500-2000 birds over three days of
hunting, and limited out every day.  Got my first double--two shots, two
birds, nothun' but net.  You gonna be at the mgt conf?  I'd love to get
caught up with you and share some new tales of woe from the pipeline
group.    PS, I met Angie Green yesterday--very sharp young lady.  She said
to say hi to you and Nicole.  Adios.  DF


Here is what I have received.
---------------------- Forwarded by Jerry Peters/NPNG/Enron on 11/11/2000
12:35 PM ---------------------------

Patricia Wiederholt
11/09/2000 12:25 PM
To: Jerry Peters/NPNG/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: PAA

Please review the attached.  If you agree with the proposals please forward
them to Rod for approval and processing.  Let me know if you would like to
discuss.

Thank you.


I just emailed Dawn that this was correct,  so that they can get this
moving.  Please let her know if it is not  ASAP.

Thanks
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT on 01/22/2001
09:33 AM ---------------------------

Dawn C Kenne
01/16/2001 05:54 PM
To: Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Torrey Moorer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tara Sweitzer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer
deBoisblanc Denny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Darron C
Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Counterparties w/ Master Agreements with ECC

Please red the paragragh in red below from an e-mail I sent last month....

I need risk to confirm that all counterparties that have master agreements
with ECC (now 41 counterparties) need to be booked with 2 legs as described
below in red.

We need this confirmation from risk as soon as possible.  We are pushing IT
to get this logic in place and don't want anything to "blow up" for risk.
Please respond by e-mail.

Thank you for your cooperation.

Dawn
3-9353
---------------------- Forwarded by Dawn C Kenne/HOU/ECT on 01/16/2001 05:20
PM ---------------------------

Dawn C Kenne
12/12/2000 10:00 AM
To: Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael Swaim/HOU/ECT@ECT, Torrey
Moorer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tara Sweitzer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jennifer deBoisblanc Denny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Darron C
Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, William Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Counterparties w/ Master Agreements with ECC

I have received an updated list of the counterparties that have Master
Agreements with ECC.  There are now about 40 counterparties that fall under
this category.  What seems to be happening is that these counterparties are
hitting on US gas products on EOL and are not bridging into Tagg correctly.
Currently, they are bridging as one leg between ENA and the counterparty.
The problem arises during settlement because ENA cannot settle with these
counterparties, only ECC can.  An example of what Risk is doing to the
products after bridging is Tagg#Q79131 / EOL #555401.

RISK:  We need risk to verify that anytime, without exception, all companies
with Master Agreements with ECC that hit a US product must be booked as two
legs:  leg one booked between ECC and the counterparty with risk assignment
of FT-US/CAND-ERMS; leg two flipping the risk out of FT-US/CAND-ERMS to the
appropriate risk book.  Also, risk needs to verify that this is only for
Financial Swaps and not Physical deals.

IT:  It is my understanding that a few counterparties are set up to be booked
correctly (with two legs).  The list is now up to 40 counterparties and will
most likely be updated on a consistent basis.  Is this something that Tagg
Maintenance can handle?  Guidelines need to be set up for Risk/Global to
instruct IT when new Master Agreements are created with counterparties so
logic can be adjusted accordingly.

Does a meeting need to be set up to elaborate on these issues?  Are there any
further issues that need to be addressed concerning ECC Master Agreements?
Please respond with your thoughts on this subject.

Thank you,
Dawn
3-9353


Man, I was needing some help this week....


I got the memo from Naomi that you sent.  First, who is Doug Imrie?  Does he
have a strong background in trading operations?  Will he be  able to
coordinate effective reviews from a controls perspective, and will he be able
to be the front-runner on how MG runs its business so that we will get a jump
start on how best to assimilate the business?   I think that this effort
should be much broader than deal testing.  It should encompass assessing
people, processes, controls, systems support, etc.  To do this quickly and
effectively will require persons who are knowledgeable about daily trading
operations.   I don't know Naomi's background, but I wonder if she will be
the right person to lead one of these efforts since she does not work in
operations on a daily basis.

Patrick Conner left me a message today to be certain that we are plugged in
with an appropriate team from ENA to review the Chicago and New York
offices.  From the sound of Naomi's memo, it looks as if Andy Cornfield is
assume to have the US responsibility. Again, I don't know Andy.

Should we circle the wagons and develop a plan for doorstep reviews that
includes some others in the process, particularly those that have been
involved in some doorstep reviews to date and those that have daily
operational experience?  I have also mentioned Shona as a good resource as
well.


Chris, as per our discussion, I just want to confirm that we have the ability
to break the contract with the EPC provider at any time.  Further, I want to
confirm that our costs will be minimal and that this whole process (ie
putting a number on a term sheet) has been based on trying to maximize the
short run value of the project.  In other works, we have no intention of
lifting their offer.  Finally, we are not ordering HRSG's or steam turbines.

These guys add no value and they are killing me!

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 09/26/2000
07:14 PM ---------------------------

David W Delainey
09/26/2000 07:12 PM
To: Dick Westfahl/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Larry L
Izzo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:
Subject: Las Vegas CoGen

Guys, I have explained the strategy/tactics that have lead to this position
in some detail.  In my opinion the company is not at risk and potentially ENA
could create significant value from a project that we have very little
invested.  I understand the construction risk on the bid as much as anyone
and we have no intention of lifting their offer. As far as EECC involvement,
as I had mentioned, Coleman was a part of all these discussions.  I will
argue that Mike and the ENA deal team made the right call necessary to
maximize return in the short run for Enron without investing significant
dollars or taking significant risks.

Obviously, I was unsuccessful in explaining such a sophisticated strategy.

Regards
Delainey

---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 09/26/2000
07:01 PM ---------------------------

Dick Westfahl@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
09/26/2000 09:30 AM
To: Dave Delainey
cc: Larry L Izzo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Las Vegas CoGen

Dave:

See attached memo.

Thanks,

Dick


Beth Ann:

I received your message and tried to speak with CSFB and Jim Armogida.  In
each instance, unfortunately, I had to leave voice mails.  It was just about
2 hours ago that I told CSFB that we were done (having left the negotiation
of Paragraph 10.1 to Jim)!

I am forwarding the latest UBS comments to you just in case I have the urge
to call you for advice.

Have a Merry Christmas.  I'm off to New Orleans this evening for the holiday
weekend.  In fact, there's a new Susan Spicer restaurant called "Herbsaint"
and I should be dining there in about 6 hours.

Thanks for your help.  Sara
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 12/22/2000 02:06 PM -----

	Christine.Lee@ubsw.com
	12/21/2000 07:29 PM

		 To: Sara.Shackleton@enron.com, david@dkelly.org
		 cc: Michael.Collins@ubsw.com
		 Subject: Re: 2 paragraphs

     Sara,

     Attached is the newly marked up version of the contract.  The
     highlights are as follows (not all changes are addressed below):

     1)  Dividend language has been inserted on page 6.  We may have to do
     something with the structure since there are two "Method of
     Adjustments."

     2)  On page 11 and 12, we reinserted our language in sections (iii)
     and (v) but conformed them to your Registration Provisions.  We needed
     to reinsert the language in (iii) for section (v) to work.

     3) On page 13, I reinserted our "best efforts ongoing obligation"
     language.  The reason I did this is because I realized that they way
     you had it drafted in the email does not work from an accounting
     perspective.

     4)  On page 14, 1st paragraph, the words "but prior to the Settlement
     Date" was added for accounting purposes.

     5)  The new ratcheting Trigger Price language was added on page 14.

     Please call me after you have reviewed the markup to verify that we
     are in agreement on the terms.

     Regards,
     Christine

______________________________ Reply Separator
_________________________________
Subject: 2 paragraphs
Author:  Sara.Shackleton (Sara.Shackleton@enron.com) at unix,mime
Date:    12/20/00 3:25 PM

Trigger/Determined Amount inverse relationship:

"In the event the Trigger Price is increased to equal the Other Trigger
Price, the Determined Amount shall be reduced so that the Effective Share
Price is increased in direct proportion to the increase in the Trigger
Price.  The "Effective Share Price" shall be the result obtained by
dividing
X by Y where "X" equals the product of the Price Per Share multiplied by
the
Number of Shares, and "Y" equals the Number of Shares plus the Determined
Amount."

Paragraph 3(a) first paragraph, 3rd sentence replacement:

"In the event that, but for this Section 3, titled "Other Provisions,"
Party
B would be obligated to deliver a number of Shares equal to the Determined
Amount plus the Excess Shares, Party B shall have an ongoing obligation to
satisfy delivery of the Excess Shares; provided however that the number of
Excess Shares to be delivered hereby shall not exceed [________] shares.
Party B may, at its sole option, satisfy delivery of the Excess Shares by
using its best efforts to increase its Authorized Shares or by delivery of
a
cash payment equal to the [product obtained by multiplying the Excess
Shares
by the Final Price]."

 - MARKUP.DOC

Visit our website at http://www.ubswarburg.com

This message contains confidential information and is intended only
for the individual named.  If you are not the named addressee you
should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.  Please
notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this
e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system.

E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free
as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed,
arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.  The sender therefore
does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents
of this message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission.  If
verification is required please request a hard-copy version.  This
message is provided for informational purposes and should not be
construed as a solicitation or offer to buy or sell any securities or
related financial instruments.


Richard,
 This is getting out of hand.  Do we have any master type documents with any
Sempra entities and if so what is the relationship of the current party to
the one we may have a master with?  If we have no master, then of course we
need to have a fully signed GTC confirm signed by both enron and sempra.
Thank you.

	Richard Deming@ENRON
	06/04/2001 01:52 PM

		 To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Sempra Energy Solutions, LLC

Dan,

Please find below details of Phy Gas deals with GTC agreements:

Deal Date: 6/01/01
Deal No: VE1654 / 826071
Buyer: Sempra Energy Solutions, LLC
Seller: ENA
Start Date: 7/01/01
End Date: 6/30/03
Firm
Volume: 10,000 / day
Price: SBORDER.SOCAL.NGI.M.I plus USD 0.17000
Delivery Point: Southern California Gas Company - Blythe Southern Border

Please let me know if you need any more details.

Thanks,
Richard
x54886


Here are the FERC presentations.  The first one is Tim's.  It corrects some
information in my presentation.  For example, Tim's presentation corrects the
hydro generation numbers to reflect the fact that not all hydro capacity
equates with hydro energy, if there isn't sufficient water to produce it.  My
presentation includes more verbal explanations.  Cooper and Alan - does any
of the data in these presentations need to be updated?

From: Steven J Kean@ENRON on 11/07/2000 08:59 AM CST
To: Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J
Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, David Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT,
Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Peggy
Mahoney/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject:

I will be on the first panel of the FERC California conference on Thursday.
The format allows a 5 min presentation and then 60 min of Q&A.  I need your
help to make sure I have "Gore-like" command of the details.  Please help
with the following information:
Enron project information (Parquet/McCubbin) -- please give me any
presentations or summaries you have on the generation, or firm purchases, we
have under way (or planned).  I'll talk with you to find out what we are
comfortable disclosing but please err on the side of giving whatever
information you have.
Updated Belden presentation (Hain/Belden) -- I believe the latest information
was as of August; I think some of the information on the cost of peaking
facilities is particularly eye-opening on the price cap issue.
Comparison to PJM (Hartsoe/Novosel) -- Is the information we are seeking from
the ISO and PX similar to information PJM already provides?  If so, it would
be nice to tie our requests back to something the Commission has already
approved.
Cancelled DSM projects (Mahoney) -- Again, I'll only use what we feel
comfortable with, but it would help make our point if we can give examples of
how price caps backfire when it comes to encouraging conservation.
ISO/PX reports (Dasovich).  I have the ISO market surveillance report.  Is
there another ISO report?  If so, please get me a copy and provide a copy of
the PX report too.
CEC/Proposed generation update (Mara/Parquet) -- Need the basic information:
proposed, waiting for permitting; how much/little the legislation did to
expedite siting (ie are we still comfortable saying that it applies to less
than 10%)?
Soft cap(Belden/Hain) -- need a crisp explanation of why the "soft" nature of
the cap is not sufficient.  Also, would we be OK if the Commission revised it
to say that bids can be taken above 150 without special filing or reporting
requirements, but those bids will be accepted at the price bid rather than
applying to all lower bids as well (ie the highest bid at or below 150 clears
the market, bids above 150 accepted at price bid as needed)?
Offers we have made/deals done (Parquet/Dasovich/ Mccubbin) -- Roseville plus
any others, offer made to SDG&E -- I want to make the point that the market
will provide solutions (below the retail price cap) if we get the utility
(and the regulators) out of the merchant function.
Herding the cats(Hartsoe/mccubbin/mara/dasovich):  We are asking FERC to be
courageous, do the right thing and ignore the politics.  To be even halfway
credible, we can't have IEP, EPSA, Dynegy or anyone else "squishing" on the
price cap issue..  We have never been closer to reform in California, we need
these guys on board.
Thanks.


Guys, Power Systems has given me a proposal to replace the New Albany and
Doyle 7B burners.  This could possibly have two benefits:
 a) elimination of the possibly tainted equipment given current patent issues
they are having with GE and
 b) apparently the newer technology significantly reduces the Nox emission
correlating into increased operating hours.

I need two things to determine if we want to move forward:
 a) Mark we need to be bullet proof on the patent (or lack thereof) issues on
the new equipment and that it would protect us from further exposure and
 b) Mitch, Kevin, Mike and Bob, I need your technical and commercial opinions
on the merits of this proposal (ie) do you as a team support this proposal?

I believe the timing on this is rather short. Please get back to me at your
earliest convenience. I will forward a copy of the proposal to each of you.

Regards
Delainey


The entire book is being sent to you via a separate e-mail.  This is the
two-page spread that highlights "making markets".

Marge
---------------------- Forwarded by Gary Peng/GPGFIN/Enron on 03/14/2001
05:18 PM ---------------------------
MARGE NADASKY @
ECT
03/09/2001 06:45 PM

To: Gary Peng/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Volatile markets spread

---------------------- Forwarded by Marge Nadasky/HOU/ECT on 03/09/2001 06:45
PM ---------------------------

"Monica Zalta" <Monica.Zalta@darcyww.com> on 03/09/2001 06:38:52 PM
To: <marge.nadasky@enron.com>
cc: <jmandelker@aol.com>

Subject: Volatile markets spread

Voila.

 - Page 6-7.pdf


- G
Attached is a contract from Colorado Springs Utilities for your review.  I've made a couple of changes already that you will see red-lined.  Let me know what you think.

Thanks,
Tyrell Harrison
303 575 6478

. . . T minus 9 days


They must have realized that Loretta could use some PR help...
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 03/21/2001 06:28 PM -----

	Susan J Mara
	03/21/2001 06:15 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: GOVERNOR DAVIS APPOINTS DIRECTOR TO THE OFFICE OF RATEPAYER ADVOC
ATES

Great.  ORA gets a PR person

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 03/21/2001 04:15 PM -----

	"Beiser, Megan" <Megan.Beiser@edelman.com>
	03/21/2001 03:43 PM

		 To:
		 cc:
		 Subject: GOVERNOR DAVIS APPOINTS DIRECTOR TO THE OFFICE OF RATEPAYER ADVOC
ATES

> A01:079
> FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
> 03/21/2001
>
>
> GOVERNOR DAVIS APPOINTS DIRECTOR TO THE OFFICE OF RATEPAYER ADVOCATES
>
>
> SACRAMENTO
>
> Governor Gray Davis today announced the appointment of Regina Ann Birdsell
> as Director of the Office of Ratepayer Advocates, Public Utilities
> Commission.
>
> The Office of Ratepayer Advocates (ORA) was established in September 1996
> after the Legislature passed and the Governor signed SB 960. The
> legislation directs that an independent advocacy division be established
> to represent public utility customers in commission proceedings.
>
> Ms. Birdsell, 45, of Glendale, is a consultant to the Center on
> Philanthropy and Public Policy (School of Policy, Planning and
> Development) at the University of Southern California, a position she has
> held since January 2001. Prior to that, she served as Vice President for
> Winner and Associates, a management consulting and public affairs firm
> with emphasis on organizational and communication problems for high
> profile corporate clients. Ms. Birdsell was the executive director for the
> New Los Angeles Marketing Partnership from 1995 to 1999. From 1991 to
> 1995, she was Director of Public Affairs for the Children's Hospital Los
> Angeles. Ms. Birdsell served the California Attorney General's Office as
> Press Secretary from 1990 to 1991. She was the producer for The Parenting
> Network for Warner Brothers in 1989 and a coordinating producer for
> KABC-TV Eyewitness News from 1982 to 1988. Ms. Birdsell earned a bachelor
> of arts degree and a master of social works degree from the University of
> Southern California.
>
> The role of ORA is to obtain the lowest possible rate for service
> consistent with reliable and safe service levels. This charge covers all
> the industries regulated by the PUC except for transportation,
> telecommunications, electricity, gas and water. Ms. Birdsell will receive
> a salary of $101,220. This position requires Senate confirmation.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Megan Beiser
> Assistant Account Executive
> Edelman Public Relations Worldwide, Sacramento
> Phone: (916) 442-2331
> Fax: (916) 447-8509
>


Susan:  In Marie's absence, could you please send Paul Simons a copy of the
Statoil master?   Thanks.  SS
---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 04/13/2000
05:29 PM ---------------------------

Paul Simons
04/13/2000 02:21 PM
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Statoil Marketing & Trading (US) Inc. ("Statoil")

Thanks - plse send it over!

Hope y'alls well!

Sara Shackleton
11/04/2000 19:22
To: Paul Simons/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Statoil Marketing & Trading (US) Inc. ("Statoil")

Just a heads up!  ENA has finalized our Master Swap Agreement with Statoil.
You may recall that Statoil would now like to execute an agreement with
ECTRIC using the ENA agreement as a model.  I have been dealing with the
Statoil inhouse lawyer whose name is Chuck O'Brien.  Regards.  Sara


Charles -- as our new ERCOT person!!, you should probably visit with Thane about these meetings and ERCOT happenings, in general.  Thanks!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Twiggs, Thane
Sent:	Wednesday, November 14, 2001 12:09 PM
To:	Ryall, Jean; Steffes, James D.
Cc:	Nicolay, Christi L.
Subject:	FYI PUCT/ERCOT Dates

Here are the meetings that I have scheduled for the balance of November at ERCOT/PUCT:

November 16  Protocol Revision Subcommittee.  No voting seat, however, any attending can vote, limited to one vote per company.

November 19 -- ERCOT Board Meeting.  No Voting Seat, (until Jean wins one next month).
		TEX MEX will be discussed, however, not in detail.

November 20 -- PUCT Open Meeting

November 26 -- Congestion Management Working Group -- Development of the TCR. I chair the group, however I will not continue to do after leaving Enron.

November 28 --  There is a capacity auction rulemaking at the PUCT.  This will be to determine the rules under which the September 2002 and subsequent auctions will take place.

11/20/20 Agenda  http://www.puc.state.tx.us/openmeet/112001.cfm

11/19 Board Agenda and Information  http://www.ercot.com/calendar/2001calendar/Attachments/BOD11192001_attachmentlist.htm

November 26 -- Information  Presentation to TAC and Draft Protocol


Hey, how are you doing?!  You've got the right address.

Errol McLaughlin
ENA Financial Trading Risk Mgmt.
713-345-8274


Yes - I got all your e-mails. Very cute. Are you ever going to say anything,
or will I just continue to receive enigmatic and virtually anonymous messages
forever?

Kate

" " <casey415@earthlink.net> on 02/20/2001 03:03:45 PM
Please respond to casey415@earthlink.net
To: kate.symes@enron.com
cc:

Subject: can you see anything ????

---
--- casey415@earthlink.net
--- EarthLink: It's your Internet.

 - Dsc00010.jpg


Legal Update Newsletter
  (May 17, 2001)

  This Newsletter is published, approximately every other month, by
  Verner & Brumley, P.C., Dallas, Texas. It is published by email.
  The current issue is displayed at http://www.vernerbrumley.com/

  In three pages, the Newsletter updates the law in three areas:
  Texas procedural and remedial law, Texas family law (our firm's
  specialty), and family law of national import, including tax law.

  We abstract only published cases. All cases reported may be found
  on commercial web directories. We have included hypertext links
  to free sources in our web site version of the Newsletter (when
  free sites are available - and when we can find them!).

  There is no charge for Legal Update Newsletter. If you do not
  receive Legal Update Newsletter but wish to subscribe, send us an
  email request. If you do not wish to receive Legal Update
  Newsletter, please let us know, and we will remove your name
  from our subscription list.

  NEWSFLASHES:

  Better behave: You can be 'cuffed and taken to jail for not
  wearing a seat belt, at least in Texas, Atwater v. Lago Vista, No.
  99-1408 (U.S. Apr. 24, 2001), but our legislature is working on
  the problem. See S.B. 112 & H.B. 363.

  ERISA & Texas law: United States Supreme Court holds that
  ERISA plan provisions prevailed when man received life
  insurance policy and pension plan in divorce, died shortly post-
  divorce, but never changed beneficiary designation of ex-wife with
  plan's administrator. Washington State law that plan beneficiaries
  are automatically revoked upon divorce preempted by federal
  law. Egelhoff v. Egelhoff, No. 99-1529 (U.S. Mar. 21, 2001).
  Compare Weaver v. Keen, No. 10-99-305-CV (Tex. App. -
  Waco Apr. 18, 2001, n.p.h.) (order denying pet. reh.) (Vance,
  J.) (rev'g & rem'g to County Court at Law No. 4, Dallas
  County) (agrees with Egelhoff but reaches contrary result).

  From the +Net: Did you hear about the terrorists who held the
  entire ABA convention hostage?  They threatened to release one
  lawyer per hour unless their demands were met.

  CONTENTS:

  Page One: Texas Procedure & Remedies

  How final is final?
  Unpleasant business
  Discrimination causation
  Admissions undeemed
  Scope of remand

  Page Two: Texas Family Law

  Frequent flyer miles
  Property law in a nutshell
  Intentional infliction claim upheld
  Child abuse reporting statute upheld
  Timely appeal hearings required

  Page Three: National & Federal Family Law

  MD maintenance
  Boarding school counts
  Post-HS child support constitutional
  No horsewhipping allowed
  No prenuptial waiver

  Page One: Texas Procedure and Remedies

  How final is final? A judgment is final if it says "with unmistakable
  clarity" that it is final, or if the judgment actually disposes of all
  claims and parties before the court.  A "Mother Hubbard" clause
  "does not indicate finality." Guajardo v. Conwell, 44 Tex. S. Ct.
  J. 693 (Apr. 26, 2001) (per curiam) (concurring in result only)
  (aff'g 30 S.W.3d 15 (Tex. App. - Houston [14th Dist.] 2000)
  (per curiam) (granting motion to dismiss appeal)).

  Unpleasant business: Mall manager told police lessee owned mall
  store and threatened to file criminal trespass charges against
  claimed purchaser, but did not act in extreme and outrageous
  manner even though he did not give additional facts. Broad
  dictum: "Business managers must have latitude to exercise their
  rights in a permissible way in order to properly manage their
  business, even though it may not always be pleasant for those
  involved." Bradford v. Vento, 44 Tex. S. Ct. J. 655 (Apr. 26,
  2001) (Abbott, J.) (aff'g, rev'g & ren'g 997 S.W.2d 713 (Tex.
  App. - Corpus Christi 1999) (en banc) (Yanez, J.) (Seerden,
  C.J., dissenting)) (aff'g, rev'g & ren'g 357th Judicial District
  Court, Cameron County).

  Discrimination causation: Texas Supreme Court adopts Texas
  Labor Code's causation standard of "a motivating factor" in state-
  law based employment discrimination suit. Court would have
  followed Title VII standards but couldn't tell what they are
  because federal courts "are closely divided on the issue." See
  Texas Commission on Human Rights Act, Tex. Labor Code o
  21.001 et seq.; cf. id. o  21.051 ("because of" standard), with
  id. o 21.125 ("a motivating factor" standard). Quantum Chem.
  Corp. v. Toennies, 44 Tex. S. Ct. J. 519 (Mar. 8, 2001) (Phillips,
  C.J.) (Hecht, J., dissenting) (aff'g  998 S.W.2d 374 (Tex. App. -
  Houston [1st Dist.] 1999) (Andell, J.) (rev'g & rem'g to 190th
  Judicial District Court, Harris County)).

  Admissions undeemed: Mandamus conditionally issued to trial
  court to vacate order, after hearing within 30 days of trial, denying
  motion to undeem ultimate-issue admissions when record showed
  that party failed to respond because of law firm's accident or
  mistake. No adequate remedy by appeal because relator's ability
  to present viable claim or defense at trial vitiated or severely
  compromised and no final, appealable judgment rendered
  simultaneously. In Re: Kellogg-Brown & Root, Inc., No.
  12-01-00116-CV (Tex. App. - Tyler May 8, 2001, orig.
  proceeding) (Worthen, J.) (writ cond. granted).

  Scope of remand: When a party contests liability in the trial court
  but only damages on appeal, a reversal requires that both
  damages and liability be retried because of Tex. R. App. P.
  44.1(b), which says a court may not order a separate trial solely
  on unliquidated damages if liability is contested, as by general
  denial. Estrada v. Dillon, 44 Tex. S. Ct. J. 613 (Apr. 12, 2001)
  (per curiam) (aff'g, rev'g & rem'g 23 S.W.3d 422 (Tex. App. -
  Amarillo 2000) (Reavis, J.)) (rev'g & rem'g to 137th Judicial
  District Court, Lubbock County, Shaver, J.).

  Page Two: Texas Family Law

  Frequent flyer miles: Trial court properly clarified divorce decree,
  which awarded 200,000 Lufthansa frequent flyer miles to ex-wife,
  to require ex-husband to "execute all documents and take all
  necessary steps to permit" ex-wife to redeem miles by date
  certain. In re: Alford, No. 06-00-00103-CV (Tex. App. -
  Texarkana Mar. 7, 2001) (Ross, J.) (aff'g County Court at Law,
  Polk County).

  Property law in a nutshell: The Waco Court of Appeals has
  written a couple of opinions that, between them, explain just about
  everything you need to know about Texas marital property law.
  Beard v. Beard, No. 10-98-357-CV (Tex. App. - Waco Apr.
  18, 2001) (everything except new reimbursement statute) (Vance,
  J.); Gill v. Gill, No. 10-00-163-CV (Tex. App. - Waco Mar. 7,
  2001) (new reimbursement statute) (Davis, C.J.).

  Intentional infliction claim upheld: Trial court's jnov on jury verdict
  of $325,000 to wife for intentional infliction of emotional distress
  reversed. Also reversed was sanctions award of $120,000
  against wife "for her misconduct during the pendency of this
  cause." Toles v. Toles, No. 05-97-00303-CV (Tex. App. -
  Dallas Apr. 11, 2001) (Rosenberg, J., assigned) (rev'g, ren'g &
  rem'g to 254th Judicial District Court, Dallas County).

  Child abuse reporting statute upheld: Houston Court of Appeals,
  in split decision, upheld constitutionality of child abuse reporting
  statute, Tex. Fam. Code o 261.101 et seq., against indefiniteness
  argument. Rodriguez v. State, No. 14-99-00479-CR (Tex. App.
  - Houston [14th Dist.] Apr. 19, 2001) (Yates, J.) (Baird, J.,
  assigned, dissenting) (aff'g County Criminal Court at Law No.
  14, Harris County, Fields, J.).

  Timely appeal hearings required: Trial court abused its discretion
  by trying case without first hearing appeal of associate judge's
  ruling limiting discovery concerning valuation of spouse's interest
  in law firm. Fountain v. Knebel, No. 05-99-01718-CV (Tex.
  App. - Dallas Apr. 11, 2001) (Richter, J.) (rev'g & rem'g to
  256th Judicial District Court, Dallas County).

  Page Three: National and Federal Family Law

  MD maintenance: In another of what it describes as "university
  degree-divorce decree" cases, Wisconsin Supreme Court
  upholds maintenance award of $1,700 per month for eight years
  after four-year marriage because wife worked, did laundry, kept
  house and even typed papers for husband while he finished
  medical school and completed residency. Meyer v. Meyer, 232
  Wis. 2d 191, 606 N.W.2d 184 (2000).

  Boarding school counts: In calculating child support, which is
  based on "primary physical responsibility," a/k/a "parenting time,"
  trial court did not abuse its discretion in imputing child's time at
  boarding school to father when father was primary custodial
  parent and his family trust paid for school.  Katzberg v. White,
  No. C031628 (Cal. App. May 1, 2001).

  Post-HS child support constitutional: As against equal protection
  challenge, Oregon Court of Appeals upholds constitutionality of
  child support statute requiring child support for "child attending
  school," which can include college attendance, despite absence of
  legal requirement that married parents send their children to
  college. In re: McGinley, No. A101792 (Or. App. Feb. 28,
  2001).

  No horsewhipping allowed: Lawyer, who had affair with client,
  added "insult to injury" by billing client for legal services after
  breaking off relationship, but actions did not constitute intentional
  infliction of emotional distress because not "extreme and
  outrageous" as matter of law. Sanctions of $20,000 upheld
  against lawyer for, among other things, asking trial court to
  horsewhip former client and her lawyer. Gaspard v. Beadle, 36
  S.W.3d 229 (Tex. App. - Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, pet. denied).

  No prenuptial waiver: Accepting court-ordered payment of
  $5,000 from husband during pendency of divorce "as an
  advancement on her award of equitable distribution" did not
  constitute waiver by wife of right to enforce prenuptial agreement
  in lieu of equitable distribution. Rubino v. Rubino, No. 99-443 (RI
  Feb. 12, 2001).

  Verner & Brumley, P.C.
  3131 TurtleCreek Blvd.
  Suite 1020
  Dallas, Texas  75219
  214.526.5234
  214.526.0957.fax
  info@vernerbrumley.com
  www.vernerbrumley.com

  Practice limited to Family Law

  Copyright Verner & Brumley, P.C., 2001


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 02/13/2001
03:14 PM ---------------------------

Dawn C Kenne
02/13/2001 02:35 PM
To: Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Tara Sweitzer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Walker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert B
Cass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melba Lozano/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin Meredith/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: Gas Daily Index Mapping

Phillip,

Andy Lewis is setting up a new gas daily index and I need to map the correct
indexes in EOL.  I am assuming for IF GD/D NGPL MidCont, it needs to be
mapped as IF-NGPL/MIDCON and I need the GDP index for NGPL/MIDCON.  Can you
please let me know at your earliest convenience?

Thanks,
Dawn

Chris Walker
02/13/2001 02:10 PM
To: Dawn C Kenne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tara Sweitzer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Robert B Cass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melba Lozano/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin
Meredith/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Gas Daily Index Mapping

Dawn and Tara,

Could you please map in TEST the new gas daily index product requested by
Andy Lewis.  The short name is IF GD/D NGPL MidCont (product #11181).  Let me
know if you need additional information.

Chris W.


At the request of Dave Samuels, I am attaching our proposed form of
Non-Disclosure Agreement.  If the agreement meets with your approval, please
return a copy to me via fax no. (713) 646-3490.  If you have any comments or
questions you would like to discuss, please do not hesitate to call me at
(713) 853-3399.


Should be Dana Davis

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lindberg, Susan
Sent:	Friday, August 24, 2001 9:54 AM
To:	Presto, Kevin M.
Subject:	RE: Affiliate/Parent Survey Form

Will do.  OK to list you as the "Contact Person"?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Presto, Kevin M.
Sent:	Friday, August 24, 2001 9:17 AM
To:	Lindberg, Susan
Subject:	FW: Affiliate/Parent Survey Form

Please handle for me ASAP.

Thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	CDeLaRosa@nyiso.com@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-CDeLaRosa+40nyiso+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Wednesday, August 22, 2001 8:15 AM
To:	kpresto@enron.com
Subject:	Affiliate/Parent Survey Form

Hi Kevin,

As per our conversation this morning here is a copy of the form minus the
NYISO logo.  Please follow the instructions below where it's appropriate.
We would appreciate receiving a reply by August 24, 2001.

Thank you,
Cheri DeLaRosa
Customer Associate
1 518- 356-7660

Dear Market Participants,

In accordance with Section 11A.0, "List of Affiliates and/or Parent
Company" of the Open Access Transmission Tariff, and in accordance with
Section 9.2, "Completed Application" of the Market Administration and
Control Area Services Tariff, you are requested to provide current
information to update our Affiliate/Parent information files.

Please complete either the Microsoft Word version or the PDF version of the
attached form, and return it to Customer Relations by August 10, 2001.  You
can email the completed form to market_relations@nyiso.com or FAX it to
518-356-6146.

If you have any questions, please call your Customer Account Representative
or the Customer Relations Help Desk line at 518-356-6060.

Regards,
Customer Relations

(See attached file: Affliate_Parent Form.doc.)

(See attached file: Affliate_Parent Form.doc)

 - Affliate_Parent Form.doc << File: Affliate_Parent Form.doc >>


Mark:
I just wanted to update you on where things stand currently with respect to
the Domain Name Transfer Agreement that we are negotiating with Risk
Management Solutions, Inc.  After visiting with Scott about the reps and
warranties, he became concerned about the overall scope of the agreement and
in particular, what in addition to the URL domain name (weather-desk.com) EEL
was being asked to transfer and the restrictions that RMS wanted to place on
EEL with respect to this Domain Name and "any variations thereof."   We went
back to RMS and told them basically that all we were willing to do was
transfer them the URL domain name with no strings attached.  I'm not sure
that this will be acceptable to them given their future intentions which is
to acquire from another third party the name "weatherdesk.com" , register it
and use it with respect to the products that they offer.

All of these discussions that we have had over the past week with respect to
our domain name have lead Seth, Scott and I to question what Enron's intent
is with respect to the name or any variations thereof given the fact that
according to Scott we have submitted applications to register similar names.
We were hoping that you could help us answer this question or at least lead
us to the right people that could.  It seems odd that we would be wiling to
transfer this name and yet feel that it is important to pursue registering
these other names.  I look forward to hearing from you.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)


no.  it just means someone has a lot of ammo.  it isn't from that movie.


You don't need to keep the attachment.  I was going to read it online -- but since you've printed I'll take it along for casual reading.   I just want to add Liz Gras email address to my contacts.  Sorry for the confusion.

-----Original Message-----
From: Winters, Ricki
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 9:30 AM
To: Corman, Shelley
Subject: RE: PAKK: Digest Number 529

I printed the attachment & will keep in my folder for future reference.

(quite long)

-----Original Message-----
From: Corman, Shelley
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 9:15 AM
To: Winters, Ricki
Subject: FW: PAKK: Digest Number 529

Please add to contacts

-----Original Message-----
From: LGras91577@aol.com [mailto:LGras91577@aol.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 8:18 AM
To: Corman, Shelley
Subject: Fwd: PAKK: Digest Number 529

Shelley,
I don't know if you've joined this group or not, but I they had some
informative posts about Adoption Discounted airfare, and Taraz and I thought
you might like to read it.

Liz


double click on the underlined website at the bottom
---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT on 11/27/2000
12:16 PM ---------------------------
To: Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Fwd: Election concession & retraction parody. Has good audio also.

---------------------- Forwarded by Ross Prevatt/HOU/ECT on 11/13/2000 01:08
PM ---------------------------

Charles H Otto
11/13/2000 01:03 PM
To: Ross Prevatt/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Fwd: Election concession & retraction parody. Has good audio also.

---------------------- Forwarded by Charles H Otto/HOU/ECT on 11/13/2000
02:01 PM ---------------------------

Chris Gaskill@ENRON
11/13/2000 12:35 PM
To: Charles H Otto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tara Piazze/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Fwd: Election concession & retraction parody. Has good audio also.

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Gaskill/Corp/Enron on 11/13/2000
12:35 PM ---------------------------

Marc Bir <marc@delphihome.com> on 11/13/2000 12:29:45 PM
To: Chris.Gaskill@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Fwd: Election concession & retraction parody. Has good audio also.

><http://www.mediatrip.com/shows/phone_flash.html
>http://www.mediatrip.com/shows/phone_flash.html


Mark,  I have a "deal" for you regarding Dave's stretch target below ($83,000
further reduction for the Tech Services group).

I have 20 new people transfering into the Tech Services Group from EE&CC who
all need computers, office refurb, etc., and I have already cut down my
equipment budget to barely cover this and my outside consulting costs to
$11K.    If you can bear my $83k reduction by reducing you $18.5MM outside
consulting budget by another $83k, I will pick up the first $83k of overage
you have during the year under my Restructuring Budget.

I would appreciate the help.  Let me know,
Brian

---------------------- Forwarded by Brian Redmond/HOU/ECT on 11/10/2000 08:39
AM ---------------------------

David W Delainey
11/09/2000 06:44 PM
To: Wes Colwell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Oxley/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Thode/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Stephen
Douglass/HOU/EES@EES, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Tholan/Corp/Enron@Enron, Brian Redmond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joseph Deffner/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: 2001 Group Expenses

Guys, attached you will find a final cut on the ENA 2001 expense budget.
Please review and make any adjustments to your existing plan that are
appropriate to hit the net ENA target.  In order to stay flat year on year, I
split the remaining positive variance equally across the groups.  As we had
discussed earlier, these costs will not be allocated to the business units
and will be tracked on the ENA income statement below the line and the
accountability managed by each of you.  All outside variable costs,
specifically related to specific deals, will be charged to the business units
eg) outside legal and tax, outside technical expertise, facility costs,
outside research support, incremental back and mid office support for
specific asset management deals, specific entertainment, etc.  I look at this
cost structure as the minimum capacity charge we need to operate our business
and evaluate/manage our risks.

Wes, can you please  finalize the one page plan (expenses and headcount) for
each group with these changes.

Regards
Delainey


Attached below are ORA phase one and phase two draft positions, which they
are working on to get as many parties to embrace. (UC/USC, DGS, manufacturs,
QFs, ESPs,...)
---------------------- Forwarded by Bruno Gaillard/SFO/EES on 03/31/2000
04:37 PM ---------------------------

"Morse, Jay" <jxm@cpuc.ca.gov> on 03/31/2000 03:57:12 PM
To: Anthony Mazy <am1@cpuc.ca.gov>, "Brown [DGS], Andy" <abb@eslawfirm.com>,
"Bruno Gaillard, Enron" <bgaillar@enron.com>, "Davidson, Kieth"
<kdavidson@onsitesycom.com>, "Duggan, Kevin" <kduggan@capstoneturbine.com>,
"Dunlop GRA, Beth" <bdunlop@gralegal.com>, "Finkelstein, Bob"
<bfinkelstein@turn.org>, George Cluff <ill@cpuc.ca.gov>, "Greenberg, Steven"
<sgreen1@ix.netcom.com>, "Gruenich, Dian" <dgrueneich@gralegal.com>, "Lindh,
Karen" <karen@klindh.com>, "Matteson, Gary" <gary.matteson@ucop.edu>, Matthew
Freedman <freedman@turn.org>, "McCrea, Kieth (CMA Counsel)"
<KMcCrea@sablaw.com>, "McLafferty [nextek], Patrick" <nextek3@msn.com>,
"Shames, Mike" <mshames@ucan.org>, "Skowronski, Mark"
<mark.skowronski@alliedsignal.com>, "Teague @DGS, Jonathan"
<jonathan.teague@dgs.ca.gov>, "Thomas, Aaron" <athomas@newenergy.com>,
"Townley, David" <dtownley@newenergy.com>, "Treadway, Nat"
<treadway@alumni.princeton.edu>, Valenzuela PE Tony CSU
<tvalenzuela@calstate.edu>
cc:
Subject: Working Points - DG OIR Phase I and Phase II - for discussion on ly

 <<Erin Brockovichrev3.doc>>

Dear all, here is a proposed quid (separation of ownership of DG from
dispatch) pro quo (discounts, exit fees, standby charges reasonable to DG).?
Not intended to supplant? UC/CSU's excellent 8 points but to put some flesh
on the bones of some of those points. Main idea is that if ORA et al receive
support for separation of ownership from dispatch, we can be supportive of
reasonable rates pertaining to DG.? Please comment.

 - Erin Brockovichrev3.doc


Ceci,

I received the list of properties you mailed.  Thank you very much.  I would like to stay updated on the market in Hood River and the surrounding areas in Washington as well.  I would be interested in lots as well as homes.  In case you don't still have it, my address is 8855 Merlin Ct, Houston, TX 77055.

Thank you,

Phillip Allen


David,

Thanks. I cc you on my message to John Sherriff.
Please, let me know what you think about my comments.

Vince

David Gorte
05/15/2000 10:58 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Dash request

Vince,

I'll send you the DASH that was done previously for the used LNG tanker, the
Mystic Lady (now renamed as the Hoegh Galleon).  The analysis used in this
transaction was not detailed due the short time-frame we had to analyze this
transaction as well as to Enron's right to terminate this charter for
convenience.

We are presently working on the analysis for a second, new-build LNG tanker.
When this analysis has progressed far enough that we have a draft DASH, I
will forward it to you (this may be later this week).

Regards,

Dave


See attached:

Thanks,
Joe


This time I'll include the attachment.  It must be Monday.

Kay

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kay Mann                           06/12/2000 10:30 AM

To: Brian D Barto/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Peggy
Banczak/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Irvin/HOU/ECT@ECT, sjensen@bracepatt.com, Jeff
Blumenthal/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Vitro consolidation agreement

Team Vitro:

I wanted to run these changes by you before sending them to Jeff Smith.

Jeff S. has lobbied for deleting the language on assignment, and state that
assignment of the consolidation agreement will be subject to the same terms,
etc. as the other 2 contracts.  He also provide alternative language which
appears to be close to what was in the previous draft. Since I didn't know
the genesis of the language in the consolidation agreement, so I thought I
would check with you first.

I eliminated 5 (a) because the contracts allow for partial termination.


Jim,

Here are the key gas contacts.

   Work   Home   Cell

Phillip Allen  X37041   713-463-8626  713-410-4679

Mike Grigsby  X37031   713-780-1022  713-408-6256

Keith Holst  X37069   713-667-5889  713-502-9402

Please call me with any significant developments.

Phillip


Molly,

We can pay for the plane ticket.
We have to make sure that we shall extend the same
treatment to other summer interns to avoid
bad feelings.

Vince

From: Molly Magee/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/25/2001 11:47 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Jinbaek Kim

We received some correspondence this morning from Jinbaek in which he says he
plans to start on June 4, 2001.   Since we are trying to offer a package
comparable to that of an Associate in the Program, I assume we will also pay
for his plane ticket here???    Just wanted to check before I contacted
him...., so I'll wait to hear from you.

Thanks,
Molly
x34804


CORRECTION - last line, Monday, May 14

	Harry Kingerski
	05/10/2001 01:16 PM

		 To: Wanda Curry/HOU/EES, James W Lewis/HOU/EES, Mike D Smith/HOU/EES, Don
Black/HOU/EES, Scott Stoness/HOU/EES, Diann Huddleson/HOU/EES,
jklauber@llgm.com, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES, Marcus Dotson/HOU/EES
		 cc: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Leslie Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/Enron@EnronXGate, Robert
Neustaedter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Rate design for 3 cent Rate increase for PGE/SCE

2 proposed decisions were released last night by the California PUC - one by
the Judge and one by Chairman Lynch.

Direct access customers are exempt from the surcharge.
Each customer class is allocated an equal 3 cents, plus an amount to cover
the shortfall from having residential usage up to 130% of baseline exempt
from the surcharge (as required by law).  Each decision allocates a
substantial portion of the subsidy to non-residential classes, although Lynch
does this to a lesser extent
The new rates become effective June 1, and the shortfall from the actual
effective date of the increase, March 27, through June 1 will be amortized
over 12 months.
Residential rate design - 5 tiers will be put in place; the 5th tier (300+%
of baseline) gets a 35 cent per kwh rate
Non-residential rate design - recommendations to put all of the increase into
summer on-peak were rejected.  About 60% of increase put into summer.
Real Time Pricing was endorsed - will further explore in workshops starting
later in May.  Voluntary program will be started.
In a vindictive outlash, Lynch decision requires federal facilities to pay
market prices under new schedules to be developed by the utilities
Judge's decision seems to require surcharge to show up as a separate line
item; Lynch's decision requires that it not be shown separately

Oral argument occurs Friday and final decision is expected to be voted out
Monday, June 14.


---------------------- Forwarded by Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT on 03/22/2001 09:33 AM ---------------------------

Billy Lemmons@ENRON
03/21/2001 05:12 PM
To:	John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robina Barker-Bennett/LON/ECT@ECT, Richard A Causey@Enron, Joseph Deffner/HOU/ECT, Andrew S Fastow/HOU/ECT, Kevin Garland/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Ken Rice/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Eric Shaw/LON/ECT@ECT, Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stuart Staley/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:	Analyst/Associate Committee Meeting

I just wanted to confirm the first meeting of the Analyst/Associate Committee on Monday, March 26 from 8:00-10:00 am in the 50th Floor Dining Room (eb50m).  You will find an agenda for the meeting below, as well as attachments containing a recent overview of the program by business unit, and the results of an October 2000 survey of program participants.  This information should help you prepare for our meeting.

Feel free to contact me at x36671 if you would like to discuss anything prior to the meeting.  I look forward to working with each of you.

Regards,
Billy

__________________________________________
Meeting Agenda
March 26, 2001

I.	Welcome and Introductions (John Sherriff)

II.	Program Overview (Billy Lemmons)
		a.	Business Unit Summary
		b.	Program Survey

III.	Discussion Topics (Group)
		a.	Program Leadership
		b.	Business Plan (Focus, Metrics)
		c..	Focus Areas (what's working / what's not...)
				-	Culture / Location
				-	Recruiting
				-	Rotations
				-	Orientation
				- 	Training
				-	PRC

IV.	Next Meeting / Next Steps (Billy Lemmons)

__________________________________________
Attachments


Happy Birthday to you...
Happy Birthday to you...
HAPPY BIRTHDAY DEAR SCOTT,
HAPPY BIRTHDAY TO YOU!

I just wish that I could do or say something that would make it a better day
for you.  It would be nice if we could at least go shopping, Home Depot, or
Target!  It always helps me to buy some plants or garden stuff when I'm down
and I would love to be able to go and do that with you.  But since I can't,
I can only send you good wishes and thoughts that your day is somehow a
happy one.

Connie, Armin and Angus


Friday, March 15, 2002

Dear Debra,

Travelocity Fare Watcher, your personal airfare tracking
service, has found fare changes in 2 of your markets.

Note: Fares change quickly and sell out fast. Visit Travelocity
now to take advantage of this great opportunity!  Click on this
link or paste the URL into your browser:
http://dps1.travelocity.com:80/fwemindiv.ctl?fw=99091015983150&Service=TRAVELOCITY&LANG=EN

HAVE YOUR TRAVEL NEEDS CHANGED?

Looking to go someplace new? Be sure to update your Fare Watcher
subscription to include your favorite destinations.

FARES

*  QHO-ABQ   FROM: Houston All Airports (QHO)
             TO:   Albuquerque, NM (ABQ)
   PRICE:    NEW PRICE        WAS        DIFFERENCE
             ---------      -------      ----------
             $158.00        $198.00      -$40.00

*  QHO-PHX   FROM: Houston All Airports (QHO)
             TO:   Phoenix, AZ (PHX)
   PRICE:    NEW PRICE        WAS        DIFFERENCE
             ---------      -------      ----------
             $158.00        $189.00      -$31.00

GREAT HOTEL DEALS!

Travelocity.com offers Value Rates at great hotels in:
Albuquerque, NM (ABQ) starting at just $49
Click: http://dps1.travelocity.com:80/hotsrqst.ctl?mode=2&airport=ABQ&rate_cat=V

Phoenix, AZ (PHX) starting at just $49
Click: http://dps1.travelocity.com:80/hotsrqst.ctl?mode=2&airport=PHX&rate_cat=V

Thank you for choosing Travelocity as your one-stop travel
resource!

Sincerely,

The Travelocity Team
Travelocity.com - Go Virtually Anywhere
http://www.travelocity.com/

----------------------------------------------------------------

VACATION DEALS!

Hot deals to the Caribbean, Las Vegas, and more!
http://leisure.travelocity.com/RealDeals/0,2942,TRAVELOCITY_VAC,00.html

CRUISE DEALS!

Don't miss a look at our incredible Cruise Deals! Updated daily,
find the voyage that suits your budget!
http://leisure.travelocity.com/RealDeals/0,2942,TRAVELOCITY_CRU,00.html

SAVE $75 IN AIRFARE

Save up to $75 on Airline Tickets!
Join the Travelocity Preferred Program and you'll receive up to $75
in cash rebates on your next three flights, hotel savings and room
upgrades, up to 20% off at restaurants nationwide, and more.  Join today!
http://leisure.travelocity.com/preferred/?source=PM

EARN FREE TRAVEL. NO RESTRICTIONS!

The NEW Travelocity World MasterCard
Earn points towards free travel with new Travelocity MasterCard!
You'll earn 1 point for every dollar spent. Earn 8,000 points
and you'll receive $100 off your next Travelocity.com booking.
We'll spot you 4,000 points to get started, so you are already
half way there!
Visit http://www.travelocitycard.com/index.cgi?mktcode=2201128602&PageID=stnd to apply.

IMPORTANT FARE INFORMATION:

*Fares shown are for one adult and are subject to
additional charges, including, but not limited to, Passenger Facility
Charges (ranging from $2-$18), Federal Segment Fees of $3.00 per segment
(defined as a takeoff and a landing), September 11th Security Fee
(maximum of $5 one way or $10 round trip), and taxes/fees associated
with international itineraries up to $113. Fuel surcharges, if
applicable, are included in the fares listed.

Total fare per passenger, including all charges, will always
be displayed to you prior to final ticket purchase. Please note
that fares are subject to restrictions, may not be available on
all flights, and may change without notice. For detailed descriptions
of the fare rules, click on the corresponding rules link.

CHANGE OR CANCEL YOUR SUBSCRIPTION TO FAREWATCHER EMAIL
http://dps1.travelocity.com:80/fwemsub.ctl?Service=TRAVELOCITY&LANG=EN

UPDATE YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS
http://dps1.travelocity.com:80/fwemsub.ctl?Service=TRAVELOCITY&LANG=EN

RETRIEVE YOUR PASSWORD
http://dps1.travelocity.com:80/lognpwdform.ctl?Service=TRAVELOCITY&LANG=EN


I fixed it.  Thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rozycki, Joanne
Sent:	Monday, October 01, 2001 11:00 AM
To:	Shackleton, Sara
Subject:	RE: can you please add the "bullets" (in Nos. 3 and 4) in this doc?

Please get out of document & I will.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shackleton, Sara
Sent:	Monday, October 01, 2001 10:16 AM
To:	Rozycki, Joanne
Subject:	RE: can you please add the "bullets" (in Nos. 3 and 4) in this doc?

renumber

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rozycki, Joanne
Sent:	Monday, October 01, 2001 9:46 AM
To:	Shackleton, Sara
Subject:	RE: can you please add the "bullets" (in Nos. 3 and 4) in this doc?

Yes, I have done that (where is #2.?  -  was it deleted on purpose?)

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shackleton, Sara
Sent:	Monday, October 01, 2001 9:42 AM
To:	Rozycki, Joanne
Subject:	can you please add the "bullets" (in Nos. 3 and 4) in this doc?

 << File: Open Issues Enron Corp2.doc >>

Sara Shackleton
Enron Wholesale Services
1400 Smith Street, EB3801a
Houston, TX  77002
Ph:  (713) 853-5620
Fax: (713) 646-3490


Amy:
I called a while back to get into the Enron class which you helped me get
into and I just recently left you a message to take private sessions from the
Princeton Review.  I have realized that I need  one on one  sessions to help
me really prepare for the GMAT.  If you can point me in the right direction,
I would greatly appreciate it.  I was looking to start sessions as soon as
possible. Again, thanks for your help with this issue.
Ben
(713) 853-7998


Do the deals booked here need to go to Unify to be settled?  Are they desk to
desk?  Sorry to bug you but I'm assigning contract numbers.


---------------------- Forwarded by Jane M Tholt/HOU/ECT on 02/26/2001 09:45
AM ---------------------------

"deborah macdonald" <dmacdonald@houston.rr.com> on 02/23/2001 05:48:05 PM
To: "Jane Tholt" <jtholt@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Fw: Waste management (oxy-moron)

Told Larry we would get together for dinner when he gets to Houston-
wouldn't it be fun to see him again? More details later. Do you have an
e-mail address at home yet? This is mine.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lawrence Gilbert" <larrygilbert@earthlink.net>
To: "Deb MacDonald" <dmacdonald@houston.rr.com>
Cc: "Leslie Lawner" <llawner@enron.com>
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2001 8:54 AM
Subject: Waste management (oxy-moron)

> Deb/Leslie
> My apologies for not responding to you both for the incredibly touching
> E-mail card.  One of my more emotional moments in the last few months.
> Actually, I had teared up and shorted out my computer while attempting
> to send a gracious response, the result being an electrical shock that
> sent me in a fit of utter gaggle babble whereby I went charging around
> my office yelling "I can solve the California Energy Crisis, I can solve
> the California Energy Crisis!".  Fortunately, I have come to my senses
> and have realized I don't need to solve the California Energy Crisis,
> they deserve everything they get.
>
> How are you doing, hopefully, not blowing crap up like Bob and Me
> (Leslie-have you talked to Bob lately?).  Yes, we did have a small
> "parting of the pipes"  herein after referred to as a "POP" at our
> Shreveport plant.  Luckily, no one hurt, and no resemblance of a 3 Mile
> Island Nuclear disaster.
>
> Deb-It looks like I will be coming down to H-town in the next few
> weeks.  My brother (still with Enron-up in Canada) is coming back for a
> visit.  When I get the actual date(s) I will let you know and hopefully
> we can maybe get together for a bite.
>
> Again, thanks for the card, it was very thoughtful of you both.
>
> Larry
>
>
>
>
>


Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 06/25/2001 06:04 PM -----

	"Dan Douglass" <douglass@energyattorney.com>
	06/25/2001 05:56 PM

		 To: "Tamara Johnson" <tjohnso8@enron.com>, "Robert Berry" <berry@apx.com>,
"Denice Cazalet Purdum" <dpurdum@apx.com>, "Ed Cazalet" <ed@cazalet.com>,
"Bill Ross" <billr@calpine.com>, "Bob Anderson" <Bob_Anderson@apses.com>,
"Carolyn Baker" <cabaker@duke-energy.com>, "Charles Miessner"
<camiessn@newwestenergy.com>, "Corby Gardiner" <jcgardin@newwestenergy.com>,
"Curt Hatton" <curt.hatton@neg.pge.com>, "Curtis Kebler"
<curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com>, "Gary Ackerman"
<foothillservices@mindspring.com>, "George Vaughn"
<gavaughn@duke-energy.com>, "Greg Blue" <gtbl@dynegy.com>, "Jack Pigott"
<jackp@calpine.com>, "Janie Mollon" <jsmollon@newwestenergy.com>, "Jeff
Dasovich" <jeff.dasovich@enron.com>, "Joe Paul" <jmpa@dynegy.com>, "Nam
Nguyen" <nam.nguyen@powersrc.com>, "Randy Hickok" <rjhickok@duke-energy.com>,
"Rob Nichol" <rsnichol@newwestenergy.com>, "Roger Pelote"
<roger.pelote@williams.com>, "Steve Huhman" <steve.huhman@mirant.com>, "Sue
Mara" <susan_j_mara@enron.com>, "Vicki Sandler" <vicki_sandler@apses.com>,
"ARM" <arem@electric.com>
		 cc: "Mike Day" <mday@gmssr.com>, "Jeanne Bennett" <jbennett@gmssr.com>
		 Subject: Summary of Opening Comments

Attached is a summary of the opening comments received so far with regard  to
the draft decisions of ALJ Barnett and Commissioner Bilas.? Comments  from
PG&E and SDG&E have not yet been received.? However, readers  may be
pleasantly surprised with some of the conclusions in SCE's filing.
?
Dan
?
?
Law Offices of Daniel W. Douglass
5959 Topanga Canyon Blvd.? Suite  244
Woodland Hills, CA 91367
Tel:?? (818) 596-2201
Fax:?  (818) 346-6502
douglass@energyattorney.com
 - Summary of Opening Comments.doc


For your information.  Please forward as needed.


You probably will want to be familiar with this website, I can offer some training, but all hourly transmission reservations will need to utilize this website after 10/01/01

-----Original Message-----
From: Holden-Baker, Susan - TMS-DITT1 [mailto:smholden@bpa.gov]
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 7:38 AM
To: Interchange Scheduling & Accounting Subcommittee (ISAS)
Subject: Bonneville Power Administration Transmission Customer Web
Interfa

First - sorry if you receive this 2 or 3 times and a further apology if you
don't schedule with BPAT - just want to catch as many of you as I can!

Last week we offered a hands on training of our new Customer Web Interface
(CWI).  At this time there are no plans to offer additional training
sessions.
Our current plan is to have one or two customer meetings the week of 9/17
where we will train a large group (no hands on).  The CWI is out on our web
site for customers to review and play with now (test version).  The
following URL should take you directly to the test site.  If you put the
cursor over the word scheduling you'll see the link to "Transmission and
Demand Scheduling".
http://taim-test.transmission.bpa.gov/taim/

If you go out and test it (make sure to print out the User Guide) that will
provide you with an opportunity to do some self-training prior to the
September session(s).  The final date for the CWI customer meeting will be
posted on our OASIS.  I would encourage you to sign up for the e-mail
exploder for updates on future CWI meetings (and all TBL business
practices).  Also, the CWI is still a work in progress so newer versions are
being loaded from time to time.  The User Guide is updated at the same time
and includes a new version number each time a change is made.

To sign up for the email automatic notification (exploder) go to the
following OASIS location:
www.transmission.bpa.gov/OASIS/BPAT

Select Forums (tab on upper part of the screen); next select Information
Notification; next select E-mail Forum.  Enter your name and email address
and select "Register"

If you have any questions please contact me.  Thank you.

Sue Holden-Baker
Bonneville Power Administration Transmission Scheduling
smholden@bpa.gov
(360) 418-8278


prices@intelligencepress.com


Jeff:
As I think you are aware, the Meixco and online group want to implement
online trading for Mexican counterparties.  Are there any tax issues taht we
should be aware of?  If we conduct online trades using ENA and telephone
trades with an Enron Mexican entity, will the exercise of setoff rights
create any tax issues?   My understanding is that the Enron counterparty will
be ENA.
Carol


Please see the attached Management Report for June 30, 2000:

Total  Today Year To Date Life To Date

Number of Transactions  1,600 175,041 180,042
Gross Notional Value $  753,567,975 83,148,899,611 84,363,586,185

Revenue from Physical flows to date ($)  5,055,509,137 5,151,260,629

New Counterparties transacting today  2
Counterparties having transacted to date  384

Also attached is the Public Domain Report, containing information which is
intended for use in presentations or reports which will be seen by
individuals outside Enron:

Total Life to Date Transactions   > 180,000, which is > 59 % of Enron,s
current transactions for the month
Average Daily Transactions    > 2,000
Life to Date Notional Value of Transactions > $84 billion
Average Daily Notional Value    = Approximately $1 billion, which is 45.5% of
Enron,s Notional Volume
Number of Products Offered Each Day  = Approximately 820


Good Morning All,
I will be leaving in a few minutes.  I am not feeling well and am hoping that some tlc and some sleep can enable me to come to work tomorrow.  I will be available by phone, should you need anything.  My home number is 281-383-2275.  I expect to return to work tomorrow, but if that changes, I will notify you via telephone before 8am tomorrow.  Thank you.

Keegan Farrell
EB3875
713-345-3317


Steve,

RISK will give you more exposure in the peer group faster.
Shan left (I think they are firing people at RISK - a normal development
for a successful company that got ahead of itself).

If RISK does not work, I shall talk to Phelim about speeding the publication.

Vince

Steven Leppard
04/25/2000 08:06 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Real options conference in Cambridge

Hi Vince

The person I was dealing with (Shan Millie) passed on my paper to her
successor, and I've heard nothing since.  The plan was to try and publish the
article in Risk's "Game Choices" real options book, which is being published
in June, along with a summary version for the magazine.

I'm supposed to be waiting for them to get back to me, and it's not been at
the front of my mind until now.  I think I'll chase them up.

Interestingly at a recent Risk course Phelim Boyle expressed an interest in
my work to appear in one the the journals he edits, I think it's Decision
Science or something like that.  Do you think this would be a more
appropriate home for the work?

One more thing that may be of interest to you is that I've now worked forward
recursive DP into my notation too.  It's simply a matter of putting the
decision nodes on the left hand side of the value symbols!

Should I chase Risk, or pursue the peer reviewed Phelim Boyle option?
Steve

Vince J Kaminski
04/25/2000 02:00 PM
To: Steven Leppard/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Real options conference in Cambridge

Steve,

How are the discussions with RISK about an article progressing?

Vince

Steven Leppard
04/25/2000 05:07 AM
To: Lenos Trigeorgis <lenos@ucy.ac.cy> @ ENRON
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Real options conference in Cambridge

Lenos

I'd like to give a talk entitled "Diagrammatic Representation of Real Options
in Enron", in which I will give a brief run-down of a diagrammatic technique
I have developed for representing real option deals.  My notation allows
originators, managers and quants to communicate unambiguously, while still
appreciating the complexity and subtlety of real optionality.  I have defined
a "diagrammatic grammar" which guarantees that the pricing of the deal
follows immediately and automatically from the diagram.

I propose to introduce the symbols and grammar, then go on to present some
suitable examples of diagrams.  If appropriate I'll talk about the links with
dynamic programming.  (I will need some guidance as to how much technical
detail I can go into based on the audience.)

All the best,
Steve

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Lenos Trigeorgis <lenos@ucy.ac.cy>
04/20/2000 08:45 PM

To: "Steven Leppard" <Steven.Leppard@enron.com>
cc: "Vince J Kaminski" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>

Subject: Re: Real options conference in Cambridge

Steve

thanks for agreeing to talk. I attach the program to see the other speakers
and style (it is addressed to a professional autience)

Please give me a suitable title for the talk (replacing Kaminski%s slot on
July 6/Energy session) and the details of your position

Thanks

Lenos

At 05:01 __ 04/20/00 +0100, Steven Leppard wrote:
>
>
>Dear Prof Trigeorgis
>
>Vince Kaminski has suggested that I would be a suitable speaker at your July
>conference in Cambridge, and I'd be happy to come along if required.  Please
>could you send me appropriate details, and the audience type expected.
>
>Many thanks.
>
>Yours sincerely,
>Steve Leppard
>
>
>
>
 - 4thconfsessions.doc

Lenos Trigeorgis
Professor of Finance
University of Cyprus
Dept of Business
75 Kallipoleos, PO Box 20537
CY 1678 Nicosia CYPRUS

Tel: +357 2 892261
Fax:        339063