Go ahead.

From: Elizabeth Linnell on 04/25/2001 04:53 PM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Government Affairs Meeting

Do you mind if the professionals in my group attend?  5 people (assuming they
all want to go - Margo, Miyung, Linda, Lynnette and Earlene) each at $190 for
airfare, $380 for two hotel nights, plus shuttle services and misc expenses.
I'm always encouraging my group to interact with Rick's group, as Gov't
Affairs is our primary customer base.

I'm not planning to attend the meeting.

Thanks!
----- Forwarded by Elizabeth Linnell/NA/Enron on 04/25/2001 04:50 PM -----

	Ginger Dernehl
	04/25/2001 04:31 PM

		 To: Elizabeth Linnell/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Government Affairs Meeting

Well, the time has arrived for me to let you know what is in store for
everyone at the next Government Affairs department meeting on Thursday, June
14.  The meeting will take place at:

The Omni Interlocken
500 Interlocken Blvd.
Broomfield, Colorado  80021
Phone# 303-438-6600
Fax# 303-464-3252
Check-in time  3:00 p.m.
Check-out time  12:00 p.m. (Noon)

The  Government Affairs meeting will take place on Thursday, June 14 and will
begin at 8:00 am and will conclude by 11:30 am.  I have arranged for box
lunches to be served after the meeting.   After the meeting, we will have the
remainder of the day for some fun activities, along with a buffet dinner
served that evening to complete the day (on-site dinner location TBD).

Block of Rooms - A block of rooms have been reserved for Government Affairs.
I will be turning in a rooming list to the hotel next week so, I  would like
to know by Friday, April 27 your plans to attend the meeting.

Shuttle Service -  See attachment for shuttle times.  Please note, a return
reservation from the hotel to the airport is required.  Please contact the
Concierge to arrange for shuttle service.

Colorado Weather - For the month of June, you can expect the
following:
High's - 80.............Low's - 52

Flights from Houston - I have checked with TAP for roundtrip flights from
Houston - Denver, Denver - Houston and an exceptionally great
(non-refundable) fare of $190.94 is available.  However, fares are not
guaranteed until actually booked.   Let's book early!!!!!

The activities to choose from are as follows:  Please let me know by May 4
your choice of activity!!!!!!

Whitewater Rafting - A bus will leave the Omni Interlocken Resort at 2:00pm
to head for an afternoon of exciting adventure on Colorado's Clear Creek.
The Arkansas River is one of the most popular whitewater adventures anywhere,
combining spectacular scenery and action packed rapids.  Teamwork is the name
of the game as your team paddles down these tumbling cascades.  Continuous
class III and IV rapids will thrill guests throughout the run. Drop over
Nomad, surge through the Phoenix Holes and take on the class IV climax, the
Outer Limits.  Good physical condition and the ability to swim are
recommended.  The group will have three thrilling hours on the river and will
return to the Omni by 6:15pm.

Chautauqua Park Hiking Adventure - One of the most popular access points for
mountain hiking trails in Boulder is Chautauqua Park. The focal point is the
100-year-old dining hall.  The Colorado Chautauqua is one of only four of the
original Chautauquas still operating in America, as opposed to when thousands
dotted the nation and culturally enriched rural people in the early 1900s.
The tour includes: transportation, professional guide service, two hours of
guided hiking - total time for excursion is 4 hours. (Dress code: Shorts or
hiking attire, appropriate footwear, sunglasses, sunscreen and hats).
Departure time and return will be relayed at a later date.

Spa Services -  The Spa at Omni Interlocken Resort offers a number of spa
services (massages, facial & skin care treatments, body treatments or nail
services, to name a few).  If you are interested in this as an activity,
please let me know and I will fax a detailed list of their services.  You
will need to call the spa and schedule your own appointment if this is the
activity you choose.

Golf -  For the golf enthusiasts, an afternoon of golf at the Omni
Interlocken 27-hole championship golf course which stretches out over 300
acres of verdant fairways is another activity to select from.  Spectacular
panoramic views from three 9-hole courses, which feature more than 400 feet
in elevation changes.  If this is the activity of choice please respond via
e:mail and I will add you to the list.  The game of choice will be "best
ball" play.

Biking -  Scenic bike paths are located near the hotel for those with
interest.  If this is your choice of activity, please let me know and I will
reserve a bike and map for you enjoyment.

After reviewing the choices above, please select an activity you prefer to
take part in.  Due to the fact that our group is so large, (which makes it
more difficult to coordinate activities) once you select an activity, we ask
that you not change your selection.  So, please talk to your colleagues ahead
of time before making your choice.

Thanks and don't hesitate to call me if you have any questions.

Gngr

 - SuperShuttle.doc
 - Directions from DIA with map.doc


Harry, I am fine with working off the imbalance because I think it is helping Gary and Steve,
	but I want to be sure it does not go the other way.  Please watch and let me know when
	we net to zero (0).  Thanks. Lynn

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Woodson, Harry
Sent:	Monday, December 17, 2001 9:31 AM
To:	Blair, Lynn; Buchanan, John; Kowalke, Terry; Spraggins, Gary; Linhart, Joe; Benningfield, Robert
Cc:	January, Steve
Subject:	RE:

Lynn, currently the Bushton Imbalance through October 2001 reflects a volume of 76,862 MMBTUs and a dollar amount of $757,607.21 due Oneok (Oneok long to Northern).  Currently, the month to date volume for December shows Oneok short to Northern by 45,904 MMBTUs.  Continuing with this trend, Oneok will reduce the imbalance amount Northern owes them.
If you have any questions, please call me.

Harry Woodson

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Blair, Lynn
Sent:	Monday, December 17, 2001 6:26 AM
To:	Woodson, Harry; Buchanan, John; Kowalke, Terry; Spraggins, Gary
Cc:	January, Steve
Subject:	RE:

	Harry and Gary, is this shortage helping the existing imbalance?  Thanks. Lynn

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Woodson, Harry
Sent:	Sunday, December 16, 2001 10:04 AM
To:	'dkurth@ong.com'; 'jmosher@ong.com'; 'jknight@ong.com'; Forbish, Sherry; Linhart, Joe; McDaniel, Janet; Sturr, Kathy; Hibbard, Scott; Benningfield, Robert; Janzen, Randy; Greaney, Chris; Adams, Jean; Blair, Lynn; Darveaux, Mary; Wagner, Mike; Wagner, Mike; Floyd, Jodie; Kile, Rick; Mendez, Angela; Stage, Michael G.; Schoolcraft, Darrell; Spraggins, Gary; January, Steve; Corman, Shelley; Cessac, Kenneth; Berger, Larry; McCarran, Penny; Herber, Stephen
Subject:

Attached is the Bushton Balance through December 14th, 2001. The scheduled PVR was short for three consecutive gasdays beginning December 12th through the 14th.  If you have any questions, please call me @ (713) 853-6600.

Thanks,
Harry Woodson

 << File: Dec14.pdf >>


Steve:

I spoke with Sam Behrends, Adam Wenner (FERC attorneys) and Joanne Rutkowski
(SEC attorney) about your question on a third quarter close.   On the FERC
side, protests to the merger application are due on May 3.  We are expecting
protests, but until we see the extent of the opposition, its hard to estimate
the likelihood of a July order.  However, we all agree that based on the
facts of the merger and the types of protests we expect to see, a July order
is within the realm of possibility.  FERC just issued an order approving the
PECO/ComEd merger earlier this week.  The order was issued 142 days after the
merger application was filed.  If FERC does not find the opposition to the
PGE/Sierra merger overwhelming, it could issue an order before FERC goes on
August recess (this would also allow FERC to meet its 150 day target for
acting on merger petitions).

Even if a FERC order is issued by the end of July, we will still need SEC
approval.  (The SEC will not issue its order until FERC has approved the
merger.)  Joanne Rutkowski thinks that although a September order from the
SEC is possible, it is not likely, due mainly to the fact that several other
big merger proceedings (NSP, AEP, Energy East, ComEd) are in the queue ahead
of the PGE/Sierra merger awaiting SEC approval.

With regard to the Hart-Scott-Rodino filing with DOJ, DOJ approval is
normally not a problem, but attorneys with DOJ have expressed some concern
that the merged Sierra/PGE company could have potential market power in
transmission going into southern California.  DOJ has submitted a request for
information to Sierra and PGE, and we are working on the response to that
request now.  Our attorneys and Sierra's attorneys do not think at this point
that obtaining DOJ approval of the merger will be a problem, but until we
receive final DOJ sign-off on the merger, DOJ review will continue to be an
open issue.  We should have a better idea of whether DOJ is going to raise
any significant problems with the merger within the next couple of months.

I see that Paul sent you a separate email on the status of the state
proceedings.

I hope this is helpful.  Please call me if you have any questions.

Sarah

Steven J Kean@EES
04/12/2000 08:02 PM
To: Paul Kaufman@ECT, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@Enron, Richard
Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES
cc:

Subject: Granite Update

What are our chances of final approval at FERC at the JUly meeting.  Jeff
still thinks this is a third quarter close.  Do we have any chance of making
that happen?
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/HOU/EES on 04/12/2000 06:59
PM ---------------------------

Paul Kaufman@ECT
04/12/2000 09:02 AM
To: Mitchell Taylor/Corp/Enron@ENRON, awalia@ei.enron.com, Ann
Ballard/Corp/Enron@ENRON, kfullenweider@velaw.com, Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES,
Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Granite Update

Attached is the April 12 update.  Also attached is an electronic copy of a
prior update faxed last week.


---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 10/10/2000 08:06 AM
---------------------------

"K. Bass" <daphneco64@bigplanet.com> on 10/10/2000 06:18:35 AM
Please respond to "K. Bass" <daphneco64@bigplanet.com>
To: "Larry W. Bass" <lwbthemarine@bigplanet.com>
cc: bdeck62@yahoo.com, "Bass, Jason" <Jason.Bass2@COMPAQ.com>, Eric Bass
<Eric.Bass@enron.com>
Subject: The Weekly Standard Magazine

?

?http://www.theweeklystandard.com/magazine/mag_6_5_00/parody_6_5_00.asp
 - The Weekly Standard Magazine.url


Greg:
I just realized I'm out of town thursday and friday of next week.  any chance we can meet with bo wednesday afternoon?


Stephanie:
Please ask Sara and/or Mary to reassign this to someone in your group.
Thanks.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com

	Stephanie Panus@ENRON
	06/05/2001 10:09 AM

		 To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Exelon Generation / Enron - ISDA Master Agreement

Carol,
See below - I have not yet reviewed the documents.
----- Forwarded by Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron on 06/05/2001 09:59 AM -----

	tglisson@mwe.com
	06/05/2001 09:44 AM

		 To: stephanie.panus@enron.com
		 cc: peter.frantz@exeloncorp.com, bmurray@pwrteam.com, ntrask@pwrteam.com,
vgeissler@pwrteam.com, mpechin@pwrteam.com, ljohnson@pwrteam.com,
dkoya@mwe.com, Andrea_Kramer%MW&@mwe.com
		 Subject: Exelon Generation / Enron - ISDA Master Agreement

Stephanie,
Attached please find our comments to the Schedule and Paragraph 13.  Please
note
that the "track changes" option is active in both documents.  Once you have
had
a chance to review the documents, please call me to schedule a conference
call.
I look forward to speaking with you soon.
Regards,

Tim Glisson
Legal Assistant
McDermott, Will & Emery
227 West Monroe Street
Chicago, IL  60606-5096
312 984-3274 Telephone
312 984-7700 Telefax
tglisson@mwe.com
(See attached file: CHI99_3694027_2.DOC)

(See attached file: CHI99_3700384_1.DOC)

******************************************************************************
*******

This message is a PRIVATE communication.   If you are not the intended
recipient, please do not read, copy, or use it, and do not disclose it to
others.  Please notify the sender of the delivery error by replying to this
message, and then delete it from your system.  Thank you.
******************************************************************************
*******

For more information on McDERMOTT, WILL & EMERY please visit our website at:
http://www.mwe.com/

 - CHI99_3694027_2.DOC
 - CHI99_3700384_1.DOC


-----Original Message-----
From: McDonald, Roger [mailto:McDonalR@talgov.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 2:16 PM
To: Germany, Chris; Bridges, Michael
Cc: Hurley, Patrick; Doug John (E-mail); Wholesale Energy Services
Subject: Gas Sales Contract Dated January 15, 1993
Importance: High

Gentlemen,

	It is my understanding that Enron Representative Chris German
informed Tallahassee Representative Pam McCullers, earlier this morning that
Enron would not be scheduling gas to Tallahassee pursuant to subject
agreement for the month of June.  If this is indeed the case and Enron does
not schedule gas with Tallahassee by 9:00 a.m. Eastern Prevailing Time
tomorrow, May 31, 2002, Tallahassee will seek replacement supplies from
alternative sources.

	Should you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to
contact me or Pete Koikos, Director of Energy Services.
Sincerely,

Roger McDonald
Roger McDonald
Manager of Energy Trading
City of Tallahassee - Energy Services
100 W. Virginia Street
Tallahassee, FL   32301
850.891.6897 - Phone
850.891.6890 - Fax
850.524.6897 - Cell
mcdonalr@talgov.com


Elizabeth, we issued late on Friday (as invoice date was May 20 (Sunday) and
it was a long weekend) here the April invoices which were hand marked either
April 1-12 (pre-petition) and April 13-30 (post-petition).  A couple of
questions:  (i) is there anything more we need to do with these invoices,
particularly to recover post-petition receivables?  (ii) do we need to send
copies of the invoices to you or anyone else?

Peter.


Attached, please find SBX2 78 (Polanco), which is Senator Peace and Senator
Sher's MOU. Originally, this was Governor Davis' MOU but the Governor has
since switched his support
to ABX2 82 (Hertzberg and Keeley).

http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/bill/sen/sb_0051-0100/sbx2_78_bill_20010716_amend
ed_sen.pdf


Call me buddy.  Ingrid wants to come over and do a dog and pony show about
Transco's new ??system?? I think.  AND I suggested she meet with EES and ENA
at the same time.

I'm thinking around the 1st week in November.  What do you think?


Just a little something to brighten up your weekend!
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Dorland/HOU/ECT on 05/11/2001 12:10 PM ---------------------------

	Dan Dorland 05/11/2001 07:50 AM

To:	Paul Devries/TOR/ECT@ECT, Jan Wilson/TOR/ECT@ECT, Jeff Borg/TOR/ECT@ECT, Dave Ellis/TOR/ECT@ECT, Garrett Tripp/TOR/ECT@ECT, Stephane Brodeur/CAL/ECT@ECT, Chris Dorland/HOU/ECT@ECT, kdorland@flint-energy.com
cc:
Subject:	Why One Firm Thinks Enron Is Running Out of Gas

http://www.thestreet.com/_yahoo/comment/detox/1422781.html

   Why One Firm Thinks Enron Is Running Out of Gas By Peter Eavis   Senior Columnist Originally posted at 5:23 PM ET 5/9/01 on RealMoney.com            A small research boutique with a reputation for rigorous analysis is telling clients to quickly dump Enron (ENE :NYSE - news ), believing that the energy trading giant's 2001 earnings will fall well short of Wall Street's forecasts.  Cambridge, Mass.-based Off Wall Street, led by analyst Mark Roberts, thinks Enron's 2001 earnings will fall 6 cents short of the consensus estimate of $1.79. The firm also believes Enron stock should trade around $30, nearly 50% below Wednesday's $59.20.  The firm's 26-page report, published May 6, highlights Enron's declining profitability and increasing leverage and suggests that the company should trade on the same sort of multiple as a trading firm like Goldman Sachs (GS :NYSE - news ), which has a 2001 price-to-earnings ratio about half of Enron's 33 times. OWS also alleges that Enron's earnings quality is poor and that key parts of its financial statements are confusing and opaque.  Houston-based Enron didn't comment by publication time on elements of the report that Detox  sent the company. An energy analyst who is bullish on Enron's outlook says the OWS report contains fundamental misunderstandings about the energy market and Enron's business model, but he says the report does include some ground-breaking and valid insights. (The analyst's firm doesn't give stock recommendations.)  Economies of Scale Why care what Off Wall Street writes, compared with, say, analysts at Merrill Lynch (MER :NYSE - news )? For one, OWS has an excellent track record. Particularly sweet was 2000, when the tech stocks it had bashed came crashing down. It has also shown itself to be well ahead of the curve, recommending that clients sell e-tailer priceline.com (PCLN :Nasdaq - news ) in June 1999, when faith in Internet stocks was at its blindest and their prices at their most insane.      Pulling Back Enron retreats after long rally   Enron, with its domination of a burgeoning energy market, annual revenue of over $100 billion and impressive earnings growth, can hardly be ranked alongside the likes of priceline. But OWS thinks Enron is set for a precipitous drop nonetheless. Why?  OWS's main beef is that key profitability measures are in decline. Margins on Enron's pretax operating earnings (which the company's earnings releases call IBIT, or income before interest, taxes and other items) are falling. Total IBIT of $795 million in the first quarter amounted to only 1.59% of the $50 billion in revenue for the period, compared with a 2.08% margin in the fourth quarter and 4.75% in the year-earlier period. Revenue in the first quarter was nearly quadrupled from the year-earlier period, yet IBIT rose only 27%. This shrinkage is due to lower-margin trading income making up an increasingly large share of Enron's revenue base.  OWS thus calculates that for the remainder of 2001 Enron needs to generate an extra $2.1 billion in revenue for each additional penny it makes over its 2000 EPS of $1.47 to reach analysts' expectation of $1.79.  The energy analyst counters that OWS apparently hasn't grasped how Enron can continue to increase earnings even when margins shrink. It does so simply by increasing volumes as the energy market balloons in size. In other words, margins may decline, but since revenues are so much higher, earnings still go up. Illustrating this, first-quarter 2001 EPS of 49 cents was 23% ahead of the year-ago figure, even though the IBIT margin shrank by 3.2 percentage points. The analyst thinks Enron will make $1.82 per share in 2001.  Growing On You In addition, the huge growth in the energy market that has so helped Enron is likely to continue for several years, according to the analyst. He notes that roughly 75% of the electricity available in the U.S. still isn't traded in a market. "Eventually it will be part of a competitive environment, but it'll take five to 10 years," says the analyst. And he believes the extreme volatility in energy-related commodities that has also benefited Enron will exist for longer than OWS projects.  Still, OWS's point on profitability is bolstered by other profit measures. Return on capital (net income as a percentage of equity plus debt) was 6.6% in 2000, down on 1999's 6.9% and well below the 2000 returns on capital at Duke (DUK :NYSE - news ) (11.8%), Dynegy (DYN :NYSE - news ) (12.1%) and even Goldman (8.9%).  Even Enron bulls will admit that its financials are hard to follow. For example, it doesn't give a gross margin number for its wholesale services, or trading, business, which accounts for 96% of revenue. But one area of the company's financial statements registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission that consistently bugs analysts is the part that describes Enron's related party transactions, which are the deals it does with entities that have some sort of link to the firm. In fact, one of the related entities that Enron has traded with is headed by Enron's CFO, Andrew Fastow. The energy analyst comments: "Why are they doing this? It's just inappropriate."  The reason for maintaining these hard-to-follow related party deals has been a source of speculation. But OWS analysis shows how a sales of optical fiber to a related party may have been used to goose earnings in the second quarter of 2000. Estimated profits from the so-called dark fiber (optical cable without the gear to send data over it) transaction allowed Enron to beat analysts' second-earnings earnings estimate by 2 cents a share, rather than missing by 2 cents.  How soon before Wall Street follows Off Wall Street on Enron?


Shelley, I need to go home, everyone is mad because I'm spreading germs.  I don't think I made a very good impression on your sister because I felt so bad.  She is really a great person and very attractive.

I will call you later, Ricki


I just got a fax in from WestLB with a couple of changes. (cringe) What's
your fax number?

To: kay.mann@enron.com
cc:

Subject: ABB Final Draft

Kay:

I haven't heard from you regarding Scott Dieball's comments which he faxed to
us yesterday.  Did you get a copy?

Please let me know if you didn't and I'll get a copy to you.

Kathy


Brent-

Thanks for your correspondence.  I have responded to your questions/comments
below in red and attach a clean draft of the GTCs, which does not contain any
further changes from the draft you have provided.

Please inform me, with regard to paragraph 6 (a) (ix) (1), as to what, if
anything, should be inserted for the event of default threshold amount.

I have also copied Susan Musch on this e-mail, so that she can determine if
all is well from the tax perspective.

Once Susan signs-off from the tax perspective, please inform me as to what
needs to be done to load the GTCs, noting that the existing EOL GTCs for
Japanese weather, are utilizing Enron Australia Finance Pty. Limited as the
counterparty.  My understanding is that those GTCs will then be removed.  I
have also copied David Minns in Australia, so that he is aware of the status
of this matter.

Cheers,

John

	Brent Hendry
	08/29/2000 10:47 AM

		 To: John Viverito/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Japanese Weather Derivative GTC's for EOL

John,

I am attaching the GTC with a few changes marked in the draft.  Is this GTC
only intended to be used between Enron Japan Corp. and a Japanese
counterparty?  The GTCs have been tailored for Japanese counterparties.

With respect to footnote number 1 you are correct the issue is covered under
4(f).  Noted. With respect to footnote number 2 unless one of the parties to
a transaction is a US counterparty or there is a local law requirement I am
not sure we need representation 5 (b).  We obtain essentially the same
representation from the counterparty under representation 5 (d). Noted and
agreed.

I would recommend reinserting the paragraph entitled "Early Termination" that
you have deleted.  Enron prefers to have "Loss" apply for valuations upon
early termination, especially in situations where there is not a liquid
market or for unusual or longdated trades.  I think the weather market is one
where Enron would prefer to use the "Loss" method of calculation.   See 4.
(a) and (b) and inform me if this is sufficient.

I would also reinsert the designation that Enron is the Calculation Agent
(unless there is a good reason to not designate a Calculation Agent).  See 4.
(d) and inform me if this is sufficient.

I assume that the payee tax representations are not applicable because there
is no withholding (for either residents or nonresidents of Japan) on
derivative transactions.  Please let me know if this is not the case.  I have
copied Susan Musch on this correspondence to receive her input regarding tax
issues.

Please let me know if you have any questions regarding my comments.

Brent


call me i want to ask you something


Hi, Kevin:

I hope you have returned to some pattern of normal operations in your shop,
given the events of last week.

Just a quick note to see if Ken Wicker from E-Source has contacted you
regarding coordination a session D (Renewables) of the Alternative Power
Track.  It appears that you're pretty busy with the Natural Gas
Infrastructure committee and I figured you wouldn't mind the relief.

Drop me a line and let me know whether or not Ken has contacted you when you
get a chance.  (FYI - Ken's number is 720-548-5735 and e-mail
kwicker@esource.com).

Thanks,

Bill Dulle
Business Development Manager
AmerenEnergy Marketing
314.613.9475

mailto:Bdulle@amerenenergy.com


Dan,

Attached is a redlined letter agreement with Southern Co. that I have made
changes based on our discussion with them late Friday.  Les is going to help
with some of the language.  Make sure to incorporate the new language on
"Binding Commitment to Enter Into Confirmation Letter" I sent to you last
Thursday or Friday.  I will send it again just to be sure.  As soon as he is
ready, lets sitdown and discuss the agreement.  We have been able to raise
Southern Co.'s price from Hub + $.15 to Hub + $.20 or $.21 with the
possibility of up to Hub + $.25.  We will know more on price on Tuesday but
lets keep blank for the time being.  I will be back in town on Tuesday.  Talk
to you soon.

Thanks.


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 01/24/2001
03:58 PM ---------------------------

Kevin Kindall@ENRON
01/24/2001 03:51 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: United Grain Growers - ERM presentation

Per our conversation yesterday...

---------------------- Forwarded by Kevin Kindall/Corp/Enron on 01/24/2001
03:49 PM ---------------------------

"Mike McAndless" <mmcandless@ugg.com> on 01/22/2001 10:57:05 AM
To: Kevin.Kindall@enron.com
cc:

Subject: United Grain Growers - ERM presentation

Hi Kevin,

Further to your call attached is a presentation I gave at the Canadian
Risk Managers Conference in Edmonton in the fall of 2000.   I'll try and
send one of Peter Cox' as well but may have some problems due to file
size.  In any event, my presentation should give you a starting point.

Mike

 - Cfoforum.ppt


I told Paul that you called him yesterday so abruptly because you didn't want
to waste his time while you got tests done for arthritis. I told him I told
you to call him back and at least hear what he has to say. He said they are
looking for people and based on what I told him an interview was a formality.

Chris


BENSON, ROBERT C,
?
You have been selected to participate in the Mid Year 2001 Performance
Management process.  Your feedback plays an important role in the process,
and your participation is critical to the success of Enron's Performance
Management goals.
?
To complete a request for feedback, access PEP at http://pep.enron.com and
select Complete Feedback from the Main Menu.  You may begin providing
feedback immediately and are requested to have all feedback forms completed
by Friday, May 25, 2001.
?
If you have any questions regarding PEP or your responsibility in the
process, please contact the PEP Help Desk at:
Houston:  1.713.853.4777, Option 4 or email: perfmgmt@enron.com
London:  44.207.783.4040, Option 4 or email: pep.enquiries@enron.com
?
Thank you for your participation in this important process.
?
The following is a CUMULATIVE list of employee feedback requests with a
status of "OPEN."  Once you have submitted or declined an employee's request
for feedback, their name will no longer appear on this list.  NOTE: YOU WILL
RECEIVE THIS MESSAGE EACH TIME YOU ARE SELECTED AS A REVIEWER.
?
Employee Name:
PIWETZ, STEPHANIE
THOMPSON, KERRI


I saw this in Houston, and this might be a promising piece of software for seeing what we have done.

c

---------------------- Forwarded by Cara Semperger/PDX/ECT on 04/06/2001 05:57 AM ---------------------------
From:	Duong Luu/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/06/2001 07:50 AM CDT
To:	Cara Semperger/PDX/ECT@ECT, David Poston/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:	Steve Nat/ENRON@enronXgate
Subject:	FW: New App in Enpower - Schedule Extraction

Cara & Poston,

Please see if anyone else in Portland can benifit from this program.

dluu

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Grace, Rebecca
Sent:	Thursday, April 05, 2001 3:32 PM
To:	Allen, Thresa; White, Stacey; Bentley, Corry; Misra, Narsimha; Coulter, Kayne
Cc:	Luu, Duong; Govers, Guido; Jacobson, Michael; Thompson, Virginia
Subject:	New App in Enpower - Schedule Extraction

Please forward this message to all members of your group and to anyone else who might benefit from this program.

Enpower IT has done an outstanding job in creating this application.  It is invaluable to me in verifying that all my deals are in Enpower correctly
and the delivery point is balanced.  It should be very helpful to be sure that a desk, delivery point and/or region is balanced.  Please take a look
and come by my desk for a demo if you would like.

PS - Thanks you Casey, JP, Gerald and Jason for helping me to test this application.

Rebecca

To Open:

To Run:

1)  Enter the criteria into the filter at the top, paying close attention to whether you want Physical or Financial deals, and whether
you want to "Include Desk-to-desk" deals.  The more filter criteria you add the fast the extract will run.

2) Hit Extract

To Export:

The middle section of the application displays all the records or strips that were extracted.  This may be quickly saved to a text
file to analyze in Excel, by choosing File...Save... from the menu.

To Summarize and Subtotal:

The Subtotal area at the bottom of the screen, groups and subtotals the records based on the fields that are dragged
into the gray area right below the filter (shown here in blue).  At the very bottom of the subtotal area is a GRAND TOTAL
for all records extracted.

<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>


---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 03/21/2000
11:47 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Sheila Glover                           03/21/2000 10:49 AM

To: Gil Melman/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
cc: Donna Lowry/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Greene/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara
Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Deville/HOU/ECT@ECT, Terri Harlan/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Rhythms stock

Gil,
I received my copy of the instructions to Morgan Stanley and the letter to
the transfer agent.
I have faxed a copy to Frank Moy at Morgan Stanley who has not received the
original,as yet.
I have requested his verification that the account is open and an anticipated
timing for the transfer agent.

Have instructions been provided with the account opening authorizing John
Greene to trade for Enron Communications Investments Corp?
Has Donna been provided with the necessary internal releases for the sale?
Are we anticipating only selling 2,392,058 in the near term since that is the
only piece being registered in street-name?
John Greene will be provided with  instructions requesting him to sell and
acceptable pricing guidelines.

Thanks Sheila


Louise,

- UBS do not want us to show "UBSWenergy.com" - they require "www.ubswenergy.com" (no caps) or "ubswenergy.com" (no "www").
- This means that for the homepage to look right, we will change the name to "UBS Warburg Energy" beside the globe graphic.
- Currently anticipate starting Top 50 marketing for PA's by tomorrow morning (UBS required changes on Splash page).
- Some traders in the market have started to refer to us as UB SOL. Although the low-profile approach we discussed made sense, on further reflection, I think we need to aggressively promote a positive short name for the system, to avoid the "SOL" connotation. Even "UBS Energy" is a lot of syllables. We are working on finding some alternative (perhaps which don't use "UBS" in the name, as that seems to be a sensitive point). If we are to do this, we will need to lobby at a level higher than where I have been so far. If you agree with my concern, some higher level contact might be in order; perhaps with some of the people you have been meeting?
- Will work with legal today on Master Agreements and GTC's, to try to get template approval AND to draft Masters for the Top 50, with specific credit terms.

Dave


please remove my email address from your distribution list.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	SaveBig <savebig@reply.pm0.net>@ENRON
Sent:	Wednesday, November 28, 2001 1:16 AM
To:	kward@ect.enron.com
Subject:	Stay In Touch Over the Holidays with Free Nights and Weekends

 [IMAGE] << File: http://wireless.freeze.com/srbzipnew.htm >>   [IMAGE] << File: http://wireless.freeze.com/srbzipnew.htm >>  [IMAGE] << File: http://wireless.freeze.com/srbzipnew.htm >>      << File: http://wireless.freeze.com/srbzipnew.htm >> Click Here to view more details about your FREE  Nokia 3390  << File: http://wireless.freeze.com/srbzipnew.htm >>     Phone  Package Includes:  -Free*  Nokia 3390 -500 Minutes -Unlimited  Weekend Minutes  -Free Nationwide Long Distance -Free Nationwide Digital Roaming -AOL Instant Messenger (IM your friends from your  new cell phone with AOL Instant Messenger loaded right  on the phone!!!)    Click  Here to view more details about your FREE Nokia 3390 << File: http://wireless.freeze.com/srbzipnew.htm >>     [IMAGE] << File: http://wireless.freeze.com/srbzipnew.htm >>

 * Phone free after  rebates. Offer subject to credit approval or deposit, and is available  to customers activating a new line of service on a one-year contract  with VoiceStream Wireless. Not all US markets are served by VoiceStream  Wireless. If you are in a non-VoiceStream Wireless area you will receive  another great offer from another major wireless company. Other restrictions  apply, see full offer for details. Offer Expires November 30, 2001.


Beth,

The mail room just dropped off your package about 30 minutes.

Liz
Assistant to Greg Whalley

"Beth Desmarais" <bdesmarais@sisystemsinc.com> on 10/31/2000 03:47:55 PM
Please respond to "Beth Desmarais" <bdesmarais@sisystemsinc.com>
To: <whalley@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: White Paper

Greg,
?
I had sent this white paper to Kenneth  Lay.?? When I followed up with him,
his office suggested that I send  you a copy of our Offshore Development
white paper.? Primarily, the white  paper addresses the reasons and cost
benefits to offshore development.?
?
SI Systems is an American company that specializes  in interfacing with
global development centers to provide American?project  management and
communications.? With the offshore model,  companies?reduce their IT
budgets?significantly and the fact that the  development is offshore is
transparent to our clients with SI Systems as the  interface team.?? Our
clients do not have to communicate after hours  with another country to
ensure their project is on track, we do that for  them.? Additionally, we
offer ethics regulation to ensure that our  customers receive fair?and
expected pricing throughout the project  lifecycle.
?
We have partnered with?10 of the best of breed  offshore companies to ensure
that?we?can provide?a  variety?of application development languages with the
best quality.?  Paul, I will follow up with you this week to see if?you?would
like to  explore this model further.?
?
High Regards,
?
Beth DesMarais
Founder - SI Systems, Inc.
914-644-8356

?
?


FYI

-----Original Message-----
From: Swartwout, Eric D.
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 10:17 AM
To: Evans, James R.; Farber, Edward L.; Kodish, Nancy H.; Kodish,
Richard A.; Kreider, Randy D.; Rogala, Charles C.; Townsend, William P.
Subject: GasConnect
Importance: High
Sensitivity: Confidential

As of 10:00 5-7-2001 GasConnect is officially back on-line and
available. All
Nominations should now be sent in via GasConnect.


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/09/2000
01:25 PM ---------------------------

Stinson Gibner
03/09/2000 01:13 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Prof. at Rice

Here is this prof's home page at Rice.  His name is Richard Baraniuk.

http://www-dsp.rice.edu/~richb/

--Stinson


William Austin:

Fax: 281-953-6728

Francisco Pinto-Leite
Enron Americas
1400 Smith Street, EB 3888
Houston, TX 77002-7361

Tel: 713-345-7942
Fax:713-646-3490
fleite@enron.com


- 10_24_01LO.xls


As you are aware, PG&E and EESI is currently in dispute regarding the PX
credits and resulting payments from PG&E to EESI.  I believe this issue is a
sore subject for PG&E.  Can you please be vigilant with respect to the
utility's Ex Parte communications, because I suspect PG&E will be raising the
issue of PX credits resulting in utility payments to DA customers as a way of
getting out of the rate freeze obligation.

Roger


The report named: East Position Totals <http://trv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=2&report_name=East+Position+Totals&category_cd=1&category_name=EAST&toc_hide=1&sTV1=1&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=11/16/2001>, published as of 11/16/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.

(Revision: 2)

Publisher's Notes:

revision


Greg,

Attached for your review and comment is the Rio Nogales Power Project
Interconnect Agreement.
As always it is a pleasure working with you.  Have a great Christmas.

Thanks,

Eric Gillaspie
713-345-7667
Enron Building 3886


Attached is the resume and interview schedule for Amy Kim's visit to Enron on
Tuesday, April 3.

Amy worked at Enron last summer.  She is a very bright young woman. We are
looking for a possible fit for her in the Govt. Affairs organization.  Thanks
for spending some time with Amy while she's in town.

INTERVIEW SCHEDULE
AMY KIM
Tuesday, April 3, 2001

          ROOM

8:30 am) 9:30 am  Steve Kean     EB 4799

9:30 am )10:00 am  Jim Steffes     EB 4799

11:30 am ) 1:00 pm  Lunch w/ Sue Nord

1:00 pm ) 1:30 pm  Rob Bradley     EB 4799

1:30 pm ) 2:00 pm  Christi Nicolay     EB 3801

2:00 pm ) 2:30 pm  Harry Kingerski    EB 4799

2:30 pm   Beal's car to airport


Howdy,
bom went out 35 at 35.5
Feb traded 32.75 and 33
Mar 33 ,(away) , 33.5, 33.75 , and  34.25.
Q2 was lifted 33
and Q4 closed at 39 for 25 MW
What day are we going for lunch  next week ?
Have good weekend
Erik


I will serve as a representative to the  Associates PRC meeting that will
take place on December 12.  As a PRC rep, I have been assigned the Associates
to represent in the meeting as indicated below.  The Associates Program has
provided me with your name as the supervisor of record as of October 1 of the
Associate as listed.

Please send the following information to me by December 1.

Associate's accomplishments for the second half of 2000 (prepared by the
associate or summarized by you)

Description of associate's current responsibilities/assignment (and any
additional rotational assignments during this last six months of the year)

Pre-ranking of the associate from your business unit PRC , or your suggestion
on ranking if no business unit PRC process has been completed (Superior,
Excellent, Strong, Satisfactory, Needs Improvement or Issues)

Any other information that you believe will be helpful in accurately
representing the associate in the PRC process

Recommendation for promotion, if any

I will receive a copy of the Consolidated Supervisor Feedback from the PEP
system through the Associates Program.

I will be at a management conference Thursday and Friday of this week, then
on vacation until Monday, November 27.  My assistant, Patti Thompson, will be
contacting you next week to arrange a time to meet or talk by phone during
the week of November 27 or December 4 to discuss your associate and his/her
performance in more detail.  I will also contact the Associates and meet with
them individually in preparation for the PRC meeting.

Thanks for your attention to this.  If you are not the appropriate PRC
supervisor for the Associate listed above,  please reply by e:mail as soon as
possible and my assistant will research where I should go next for this
input.


According to all the FERC lists Leslie left me - they are nowhere to be
found. I have checked all 6 lists lists twice.

	Tana Jones
	09/01/2000 08:56 AM

		 To: Shari Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Oglethorpe Power Corporation

I originally had the referenced counterparty opened for power.  Are we sure
it is not a FERC approved marketer?


Patrick,

We have those two models in the exotica library.   You need to add Exotica.xll
located in O:\research\exotica\xll to your Excel before you can use the
functions.
You can find the documentation in  O:\research\exotica\doc.
Example spreadsheets can be found in  O:\Research\Exotica\ExampleSpreadsheets.

The precedure of addin is as follows.
1) Clik Tools/Addin on your Excel
2) Choose Browse and got  to O:\research\exotica\xll
3) Select Exotica.xll or its identical copy Exotica1.xll
4) Answer the question "Copy ..."  No.
5) Click OK, then you should see EXOTICA menu bar pop up.

If you have any more questions please let me know.

Zimin

Vince J Kaminski
11/21/2000 08:06 AM
To: Patrick Markey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Zimin Lu/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Enron Exotica Options Library

Patrick,

Please, contact Zimin Lu, 713 853 6388.

Vince

Patrick Markey
11/21/2000 05:15 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Patrick Markey/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Enron Exotica Options Library

Vince,

I am trying to price a crack spread option utilizing either of the following
models in the Exotica Library:

1. Spread Options by 1-D integration - SPRDOPT

2. Spread Options on Asian Spreads - ASNSPRD

How do I get access to these options models?  Who can I visit with in the
Houston group if I have any questions regarding the models.  Your help would
be greatly appreciated.  I am located in Singapore, so I would probably be
visiting with the Houston personnel via e-mail.

Thanks,

Pat Markey

P.S. - I have access to the O:\research\exotica\xll\xll_templates\ directory;
however, there are no macros associated with the programs that I can find.
Also, I don't have access to the M: drive.  Please let me know where to find
these options models.


It's getting harder and harder to root, root, root for the home team.

Heather Robertson <hrobertson@hbk.com> on 09/25/2000 06:09:01 PM
To: John.Arnold@enron.com
cc:
Subject: RE: Young John?

I KNOW!!!  I was even in San Francisco ...!!  How humiliating...
Apparently, you were not cheering hard enough.

-----Original Message-----
From: John.Arnold@enron.com [mailto:John.Arnold@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, September 25, 2000 5:23 PM
To: hrobertson@hbk.com
Subject: RE: Young John?

What'd you do to my Cowboys?

Heather Robertson <hrobertson@hbk.com> on 09/01/2000 09:02:04 AM

To:   John.Arnold@enron.com
cc:
Subject:  RE: Young John?

Just read it...great article!

Have fun in Costa Rica... I hear it is amazing.

-----Original Message-----
From: John.Arnold@enron.com [mailto:John.Arnold@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2000 4:10 PM
To: hrobertson@hbk.com
Subject: RE: Young John?

The Fortune article is about grassroots change within a company.   It is
written about the lady who started EOL, but I'm in it a little.   Chief of
natural gas derivatives...I'm not really sure what that means.  I run the
Nymex book now but not the floor..just the derivatives desk of five people.

I'm actually going to Costa Rica tomorrow morn thru Monday.   Never been
but heard it's beautiful.  Next time you're in we'll go out.
J

Heather Robertson <hrobertson@hbk.com> on 08/31/2000 01:20:05 PM

To:   John.Arnold@enron.com
cc:
Subject:  RE: Young John?

What do you mean?  I'm serious!

So what Fortune article?  I only saw you in Time...  Pretty freaky to see
someone you know like that!  What the heck is a "chief" of natural gas
derivatives?!  Skilling's old job?

Check out the Amazon (AMZN) chat on Yahoo... I was joking that all of my
friends were in the press lately (i.e. YOU, as well as all my HBS buddies),
so the guys on the trading floor thought this would be funny.  The best
part
is that someone thought they were serious and started in on the
conversation!!  I do investor relations for a hedge fund in Dallas, so
that's why they are talking about my IR/selling skills... but it's not
exactly your typical corporate IR position considering our investor base.

I'm going to be in your neck of the woods tomorrow.  I'm visiting friends
in
Houston on Friday & Saturday, then going to my sister's house in Bay City
on
Sat. night.  No firm plans, just getting out of Dallas.  Are you going to
be
around?

I thought about you the night after I saw the article because I was in
Snuffers, drinking a strawberry daiquiri...    =)  do you remember why??
I
think about that every time I go there....

Take care and make money!

-----Original Message-----
From: John.Arnold@enron.com [mailto:John.Arnold@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2000 11:48 AM
To: hrobertson@hbk.com
Subject: Re: Young John?

Glad to see you're having so much fun with this.  I've been here 5.5 years
with nothing and then in one week I'm in Fortune and Time.  Pretty funny.
Things are going well here .  The big E just chugging along, bringing the
stock price with it.  Wish I could tell you everything new in my life, but
I think I just did.
Your long lost buddy,
John

Heather Robertson <hrobertson@hbk.com> on 08/31/2000 10:10:09 AM

To:   john.arnold@enron.com
cc:
Subject:  Young John?

Is this "the 26-year-old chief of natural-gas derivatives"?  If so, you
should write me back after you complete your "nine hours and $1 billion in
trades" today!!   Does this mean I have to start calling you "Mr. John"?!
It was great to see you're doing so well....
Your long lost buddy,
Heather

Heather Lockhart Robertson
HBK Investments LP
Personal:
214.758.6161 Phone
214.758.1261 Fax
Investor Relations:
214.758.6108 Phone
214.758.1208 Fax


Start Date: 3/6/01; HourAhead hour: 10;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001030610.txt


FYI

Vince
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 02/24/2000
05:12 PM ---------------------------

Stinson Gibner
02/17/2000 11:23 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Ravi Thuraisingham/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Thomas D
Gros/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Summer Intern: Paulo Oliveira

Vince:  Here is the information that I have on Paulo.    He would be slated
to work for the summer with April Hodgeson and Matt Harris on how streaming
media products may add value to advertising or some related area.
Actually, he would also be a good fit for helping to think ways to analyze
our Enron On-line data.    I have asked if he can send a resume.   In the
mean time, most of his relevant information is attached below.

--Stinson

---------------------- Forwarded by Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT on 02/17/2000
11:14 AM ---------------------------

Paulo Rocha e Oliveira <paulo@MIT.EDU> on 02/10/2000 12:04:56 PM
To: "Stinson Gibner" <Stinson.Gibner@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Re: Trip to Houston

Stinson,

Thank you for your e-mail.  My phone number is (617) 492-9551.

I graduated from Princeton University in 1996 (mathematics), and came
straight to MIT for a
Ph.D. in Operations Management at the Sloan Schoolof Management.  In my first
three years I took all the required coursework in mathematics,
optimization, stochastic processes, etc., as well as a number of courses in
psychology (at MIT and Harvard).  I am working with Prof. Gabriel Bitran,
and I am interested in the mathematical modeling of service operations.  In
particular, I am interested in the interaction between customers and
companies (hence the interest in psychology).  The (tentative) title of my
PhD thesis is "Pricing Substitute Products on the Internet", and I am
sending you the summary which I sent to Tom Gros a few weeks ago that will
give you an idea of what this research is about.

Thanks again, and I'm looking forward to meeting you and your research
group next week.

Paulo

Pricing Substitute Products on the Internet

Objective:

To develop new tools to decide pricing policies for goods and services sold
on
the internet.

Motivation:

This research is motivated by the fact that traditional choice and
optimization
models are not appropriate for internet-related businesses.  The technological
innovations associated with the internet brought about an overload of
information
which inevitably affects the ways in which consumers make choices.
Furthermore,
companies have a great deal of influence on how much information consumers can
have access to.

The problem of pricing substitute products is an important strategic issue
faced
by internet companies.  Consumers usually search for generic products (e.g.
VCRs
or computers) without knowing exactly what they will buy.  Companies can show
different products and different prices to each consumer.  This type of
flexibility
was not available until the internet came about.

The problem of pricing substitute products is not unique to the internet.  The
methodology developed by this research should be transferable to a number of
other settings, such as pricing services.  Services are unique, and there are
many cases where customers will only buy one of many services offered by a
given company.  Our model will help companies decide which services to offer
to which customers and how much to charge for these services.

Research Strategy:

Our research strategy is to divide the pricing problem into two components
which can be combined to generate optimal pricing strategies.  These
components are choice models and optimization models.

Choice Models:

Choice models describe how customers make choices.  The management literature
draws on two main sources for these models: psychology and economics.  The
common approach in psychology models is to use what are called heuristic
elimination methods.  These methods consist of the elimination of options
based on the sequential elimination of features until only one choice
remains.
These methods tend to be very context-specific and do not lend themselves very
easily to mathematical analysis.  Economists focus on utility-maximing models
that are significantly more mathematically tractable than psychological
models.
The most common economic model of choice is the logit model.  The problem with
these types of models is that they are not very accurate reflections of how
consumer make choices on the internet.  The first step in our research will
be
to develop choice models that capture the interactions going on between
customers
and companies on the internet.

Optimization:

Traditionally, the optimization problem consists of maximizing revenue over a
certain planning horizon.  On the internet, the problem of maximizing revenue
still exists, but there is also a need to learn about customers.  Short term
profit is based on sales, but long term profit is based on how well you know
your customers and are able to retain them.  The optimization problem must
therefore include a short term component (sales) and a long term component
(learning).


Mike,

Attached are red-lined versions of the two Transaction Agreements for the
transaction between Coral Energy Resources and enovate which includes the
changes that we discussed.  Please call me at (713) 853-5705 with your
comments.

Stacy


Hi gang!
Hope all is well with you all.  Just thought I'd give you all an update on
our new home, that is if all the inspections go smoothly.  It's in Browns
Pt., 4602 41st St. to be exact, it's described as a super clean rambler, new
carpet, vaulted ceilings with fireplace in living room, kitchen has
nook,island, family rm, big fenced backyard which seems well landscaped to
my standards anyway.  It has 3 bedrooms, 2 baths, 2 car garage w/ opener!
We'll be closer to family, friends,Steve's work & hopefully have a better
sense of community for Queen Isabel.  We're excited to say that we're just
outside Tuscany, which is where a beautiful community lies with $300k & up
homes.  Can't wait to have you all over to unpack, clean, paint, babysit &
mow the lawn, so mark your calendars for Nov. 30th! This is also Steve's
34th birthday, hmmmm I think I'll buy him a house, don't ruin the surprise.
Take care,
Jennifer

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp


I would like each of you to list your top 5-10 target customers for 2000 by
12pm tomorrow.  Please let me know if you have any questions.


Please advise how to respond to GE.  Kay has the change order for final
review and approval, and Jody Pierce's group has the invoice.

----- Forwarded by Brian D Barto/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 03/23/2001 12:21 PM
-----

	jeffrey.darst@ps.ge.com
	03/23/2001 10:58 AM

		 To: bbarto@enron.com, matthew.tezyk@enron.com
		 cc: gary.chapman@ps.ge.com, sharon.torre@ps.ge.com, john.schroeder@ps.ge.com
		 Subject: Blue Dog Max storage

Attached is a copy of the invoice that we issued for the storage of Unit #1.
This invoice has not been paid.  I believe you are waiting for the signing
of the contract change order.  Neither of us expected this process to take
this long.

As we have an agreement that the equipment will be stored, and we agree on
the price of the storage, I am requesting that this invoice be paid
immediately.

>  <<Blue Dog N01G8299.xls>>
>
Thank You,

Jeff
Global Power Plant Systems
518-385-0663
518-381-1513 (fax)

 - Blue Dog N01G8299.xls


I'm so glad to hear it! Cara suspected it was an EOL bug that had since been
fixed. Thanks for clarifying this.

Kate

From: Duong Luu/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/26/2001 11:24 AM CST
To: Cara Semperger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Steve Nat/ENRON@enronXgate
cc: Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Swerzbin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kate
Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Diana Scholtes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sean Crandall/PDX/ECT@ECT, Tom
Alonso/PDX/ECT@ECT, Mark Fischer/PDX/ECT@ECT, Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff
Richter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Mallory/PDX/ECT@ECT, Matt Motley/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Michael M Driscoll/PDX/ECT@ECT

Subject: RE: AN EOL GLITCH THAT HAS TO DO WITH APRIL DEALS

Hello Cara,

We have determined that the EOL Bridge in production is currently working and
handling time zone issue very well.
Back in June 2000, there is a bug, which related to time zone issue and we
fixed it since then. All deals that you
provided to us had entered before July 2000.

We will run a query to identify if there are any other deals, which have
similar problem with time zone.

Please let me know if you find more problems with EOL Bridge, we will fix it
immediately.

Your help is highly appreciated

Regards,
dluu

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Semperger, Cara
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2001 6:49 PM
To: Nat, Steve; Duong Luu/HOU/ECT@ENRON
Cc: Belden, Tim; Swerzbin, Mike; Symes, Kate; Scholtes, Diana; Crandall,
Sean; Alonso, Tom; Fischer, Mark; Badeer, Robert; Richter, Jeff; Mallory,
Chris; Motley, Matt; Driscoll, Michael
Subject: AN EOL GLITCH THAT HAS TO DO WITH APRIL DEALS

I ran across a bunch of EOL deals that have not represented the April Time
zones right. They marked through April 6th as PST. Daylight savings time is
on April 1.  I don't see any new deals so I am hoping that it was something
in the programming that was corrected.  Steve, we will let you know if we see
any new ones, but the latest one looks like it was done a while ago. All of
these deals are fixed.

347721
353734
353813
352524
361210
352809
346646
346647
352628
360473
360475
360477
360483
361244
366541
366543
346822
348162

Cara Semperger
03/23/2001 01:39 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: A whole bunch of deal errors that I want your opinion on .

I just ran a forward ob for April 2 to check for deals that are in PST when
they should be PDT.

Do you want to change all of these to PPT deals, or do you have time
constraints today?  I need these changed today because we are already setting
up for April.

SW Regions
347721
353734
353813
407053
352524
361210
352809
346646
346647
352628
360473
360475
360477
360483
361244
366541
366543
346822
348162

NW Regions
318870
349864

I am particularly worried about how these are corrected because they are long
term transmission deals that cannot be autoscheduled.
503107
503112


Sorry, I had not printed the documents. Since the June and Aug reports for
Wheatland were in seperate documents, I assumed all monthly reports would be
seperate documents.

-----Original Message-----
From: Benjamin.Rogers@enron.com [mailto:Benjamin.Rogers@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2000 11:50 AM
To: fabian.lipp@lgeenergy.com
Subject: RE: Questions

Fabian:
The July and August Operators report for Gleason are out on DealBench at
Doc # 04.01.04.? The July Operators Report for Wheatland is also in
DealBench at Doc. # 04.01.04.? The September reports for both plants are
not out yet, but will be soon, probably next week.? I am working on getting
you the hourly operational data for the months of August and Sept.? Please
let me know if you have any more questions.
Ben


are attached.  I shall be meeting with Richard Sanders to discuss these
further tomorrow.

 - 0139035.01


Attached is the Enron Americas GasTrading violation memos for  Maturity Gap
Risk and VaR for June 13, 2001.  The Office of the Chairman for Enron
Americas is responsible for printing out a hard copy of this memo, signing it
and returning the hard copy to Chris Abel at 3155a, who will forward it to
RAC to obtain their signature.

Thank You


Jim and Margaret:

Attached you will find the latest version of the transition document.  It
incoprporates most of the suggestions you made as well as the agreements we
camr to on my last visit to HOU.

Margaret,  as you will see I need you help with a couple of pages.

Jim, I need you to help me get some people to participate in the Addressing
Specific Issues chapter.

I hope you find it useful.

Best,

Ricardo


Please see below responses highlighted in blue.

Stephen.Dyer@bakerbotts.com on 04/16/2001 03:49:59 PM
To: Stanley.Horton@enron.com
cc: david.hill@msdw.com, Adam.Schucher@bakerbotts.com

Subject: some questions...

 We are starting on your drafting work now that we have received the
engagement letter.  We have a few questions that need answering, as follows:

1. I need David to send me materials on Morgan Stanley Trust Co. so
that we can properly designate the right entity by correct name, etc.  If
they have any suggested or required language for our documents, I need to
see that as well.  Finally, I need for David to confirm with Morgan
Stanley's fiduciary people whether Morgan Stanley can serve as a co-agent
under a Statutory Durable Power of Attorney and whether there are any
constraints or limitations in doing so that would impact our drafting.
David can follow-up directly with me if that suits you.

2. I want to remind you to send me a photocopy of Caron's "old" trust
document, so that we may consider whether it fits the current plan and can
serve as a receptacle under the current plan.   Sending it out today

3. We talked about setting up Debbie and MSDW as co-executor and
co-trustees under your Will, with Caron as back-up to Debbie in that
position.  However, we are also going to create a generation-skipping trust
right away for Caron.  Who should be the initial trustee(s) of Caron's
trust?  Debbie and MSDW?  or Randy and MSDW?  or even Caron and MSDW?   and
who shoud be back-up?   Caron and MSDW

4. You said that Debbie wants to name you as executor and trustee under
her will.  Who should be your back-up in those roles?  If Linda Wehring is
Debbie's back-up on Debbie's power of attorney, I would suggest that she
also be the back-up executor/trustee, but Debbie may prefer to name Caron.
It would be best if Debbie would name at least two successors after you.
 1.  Caron
 2.  Linda Wehring (alternate)

 That's it.  Please respond by whatever mode you prefer.  I hope
email is reasonably satisfactory for purposes of my asking these questions.
I tend to start with email because it is so non-obtrusive, but I'm happy to
do whatever you prefer.

SD


---------------------- Forwarded by Mike Grigsby/HOU/ECT on 10/18/2000 12:53
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kenneth Shulklapper                           10/16/2000 11:04 AM

To: Mike Grigsby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Keith Holst/HOU/ECT@ect
cc:
Subject: (no subject)

---------------------- Forwarded by Kenneth Shulklapper/HOU/ECT on 10/16/2000
11:04 AM ---------------------------

Dave Karson <dkarson@emeridianequities.com> on 10/16/2000 10:56:01 AM
Please respond to dkarson@emeridianequities.com
To: kenneth.shulklapper@enron.com
cc:
Subject: (no subject)

enjoy

 - Olivia Newton John - Physical.mp3


PROCESSING

TW/25374	Oneok		12/1-12/31/01		15,500/d	> MDQ	& Extend	Processing

42750/20771	Oxy		1/1/02-12/31/02	42,466/d	Extend Discount	Routing

42863/108475	WGR		12/1-12/31/01		5,000/d	Permian to Permian	In Capacity

TENDERED

42661/107919	Virginia Pwr	11/01 - 10/31/04	150,000/d	Add Rate Lang		Tendered 11/6/01

TERMINATING - NNG    (Unless extended prior to 11/30/01)*

107704		Conoco			5,500/d		Permian to Permian

107903		NGTS			85,000/d		Permian to Permian

108084		Mirant			6,534/d		Various to Demarc

108301		NGTS			23,000/d		Permian to Permian

108377		CMS Marketing		7,000/d		MidCon to MidCon

108479		Richardson		25,000/d		Permian to Permian

108481		Mirant			69,200/d		Ogden to Ogden

* EOL Agreements and Agreements with day-to-day terms are not included on this list...


Attached is a directory of websites that I find valuable, in case you were
not previously aware of it.

http://www.dei.gr/main/utility.htm


Start Date: 1/10/02; DayAhead market;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002011016.txt


I have not personally talked to James about these issues in Enpower.  His
concerns regarding swaptions and asian options are accurate.  IT is currently
working on new volatility curves for swaptions to use.  IT is also working on
correlations in order for asian options to be valued properly.  London trades
many more swaptions and asian options than the US; therefore, the impact of
not having swaption volatility curves and correlations is greater to them.
The majority of options in the U.S. are European monthly and daily exercises
and the current volatility curves adequately take care of these deals.  The
idea of swaption volatility curves has floated around in the US, but other
more material items always got in the way and we continue to use the deal
specific volatilities for the swaptions we do have.  Once the technology is
in place to use swaption volatilities we will also adopt.   The system was
originally built to handle the physical power world that existed in the US
and as new markets and new ideas (such as the US becoming more and more of a
financial market) we will need to enhance Enpower to follow suit.  Swaption
vols and asian options are two of these enhancements.

Also, it is difficult to get option data out of Enpower.  We have in stage an
option sensitivity matrix that, once implemented into production. I will be
sure that James knows about.  It probably will not solve all his problems,
but it will give him a starting place.

Stacey

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Sally Beck                           12/11/2000 11:00 AM

To: Stacey W White/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Enpower

In cleaning up e:mails, I ran across this one that I had not yet read.  Has
James called and talke with you about Enpower?  Are his concerns in the memo
accurate?  Let me know.  --Sally
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 12/11/2000 11:03 AM
---------------------------

Fernley Dyson
11/29/2000 02:54 AM
To: Richard Causey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Enpower

Just a heads-up - a long-winded email, but please see highlighted paragraphs.
I find it hard to believe the scenario portrayed here, but stranger things
have happened - will keep you posted.
---------------------- Forwarded by Fernley Dyson/LON/ECT on 29/11/2000 08:44
---------------------------

James New
28/11/2000 13:42
To: Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Port/Market Risk/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Mike Jordan/LON/ECT@ECT, Coralie Evans/LON/ECT@ECT, Fernley
Dyson/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Status update on the issues surrounding Continental Power
volatilities and correlations

As you know for some time we have been trying to get the Continental Power
traders to increase the volatilities they use for valuing their option
portfolio and for use in calculating their VAR as it has been obvious that
the market  has become more volatile but this was not being reflected in
their mark.

In looking at the impacts of this, various other issues came to light.
Firstly it raised issues over the correlation matrix used in the VAR model as
this was way out of date. We have worked with Jitendra and have now put in a
matrix that both the traders, risk and RAC are happy with. Secondly, as you
may be aware, in Portcalc swaptions currently use the volatility input on the
deal ticket and not off any volatility curve.

The current portfolio is 90% swaptions and so this represents a serious issue
for us in that it is not practical to manually change all the volatilities at
the deal ticket level every time the implied voaltilities change. We cannot
use the option functionality as this only values hourly or daily exercise
options and not fixed expiry swaptions or options. We also have not found any
way in Portcalc of valuing Asian options so we are having to 'force' in the
few we have. We have had the Houston based Portcalc IT team work on a 'new'
piece of swaption valuation code but currently it contains a number of
worrying bugs. These are primarily that the proposed code does not take the
correct underlying forward price and uses the volatility of (approximating)
the last day of the underlying rather than the implied volatility of the
underlying.

They are currently being hampered in that they do not have any IT personnel
who have sufficient option knowledge (I understand that the two most
experienced coders resigned to go to another Houston based energy company).
This is extremely worrying and I find it hard to believe that the whole of
Enron's power business is having to use the methodology of inputting the
volatility at the deal ticket level. This will almost certainly mean that
different volatilities are being used in the VAR as are being used to value
the swaption portfolio globally. As well as these issues we have concerns
over the use and accuracy of the smile adjustment in Portcalc (worryingly it
does not seem that you can 'switch' this off). Briefly it seems that Portcalc
calculates the delta used to adjust the volatility by comparing the strike
price to the forward price of the last day of the underlying rather than the
forward price of the underlying itself.

We have engaged London based  IT and are looking at the code we have used in
Power 99 to se if there is a way we can get something done quickly to start
to value all option products off a curve and to be able to book Asian options.

Once we get the above resolved we still have no way or extracting the vega or
gamma risk from Portcalc in it's current state as the information is just no
there (so we are told by IT). The system 'seems' (we cannot be 100% sure
given all the other errors) to produce a vega and gamma P&L number but what
the risk is remains a mystery. Again this is very worrying in that we have
Power option traders all over the world who can't get their underlying vega
or gamma risk position from the global valuation system. We are trying to
work on something manual to draw a line in the sand but I would really like
to know how the American based traders cope as they have this problem
(knowingly or not)  for years. What sign offs were gained for the
implementation of Enpower because it seems to us that using the current
system it is not possible to comply with the Global Risk policy. How do we
validate the inputs to the valuation if we do not know the risk ?

Despite the above we have now persuaded the traders to save out newer higher
volatilities a week ago and you should have seen a large move up in their
VAR. However, as it stands at the moment they are notable to save out a daily
remark as Jitendra is saying that he is not happy with their 'model' / vol
curve generator (I have today asked for a full explanation, details of any
testing etc etc and time lines so we can move to getting over this hurdle).
The swaptions have also not yet had the ticket volatility changed but the
impacts are expected to be positive as we are long volatility.

I would appreciate your comments on the above as it seems that we are pushing
the boundaries here on areas which we really expect to have already been
covered in Houston some time ago and could do with some help. We are having
to use a system which seems to us to have numerous bugs and short comings and
are having to spend an enormous amount of IT time overcoming the inadequacies
of Enpower wich I do not think most people are aware of. Consequently we have
not been able to deliver all the improvements we were required to do in
gaining the increased limits so 3 months ago but I would hope you agree that
it is not for a lack of trying.

Sorry it's so long but if there are any questions or any perceived
inaccuracies in any of the above then please let me know.

James


Carmen--please print these up for me.  thanks. DF
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 01/04/2000
05:23 PM ---------------------------

Sarabeth Smith
01/04/2000 03:51 PM
To: Mike McGowan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Julia
White/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dari Dornan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Maria
Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rick Dietz/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Sheila
Nacey/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Handouts for: Video Conference Call - Document Controls
Investigation - 1/5/00 2:30 p.m.

Attached is the first draft for your review of the findings of the Document
Controls Investigation, which we will discuss at tomorrow's 2:30pm video
conference.
The agenda for the meeting tomorrow is to review the findings and potential
recommendations and decide on a course of action.

Additionally, attached is a list of the individuals interviewed during the
course of this investigation.

If I can answer any questions before the meeting tomorrow, please call me in
Houston at X37973 or page me at 1-800-974-6147.
Looking forward to our discussion tomorrow,
Sarabeth

---------------------- Forwarded by Sarabeth Smith/ET&S/Enron on 01/04/2000
03:31 PM ---------------------------

Julie McCoy
12/30/99 10:45 AM
To: Mike McGowan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Julia
White/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dari Dornan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Maria
Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rick Dietz/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Sheila
Nacey/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Sarabeth Smith/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Martha Benner/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ricki Winters/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Alma
Carrillo/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ann Smith/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Video Conference Call - Document Controls Investigation - 1/5/00
2:30 p.m.

Message per Sarabeth Smith:

Meeting Confirmation:

 Topic:  First Draft of Findings of the Document Controls Investigation

 Date:  Wednesday, January 5, 2000

 Time:  2:30 PM-3:30 PM

 Location:   Omaha and Houston Video Conference Rooms


Mr. Lay, I have always admired the company YOU created and the corporate culture you created.

As the CFO of a public company I understand, at least somewhat, of the struggles involved in being a public company.

I certainly empathize with you during this tough time. Unfortunately people expect you to be perfect. It's also easy for people outside of Enron to throw stones. A lot of them are jealous outsiders that have been waiting for this for a long time.

Don't let them win, prove to them the power and strength of Enron and have the last laugh. Regards, and I'll be laughing with you.


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 02/19/2001
05:51 PM ---------------------------

"Chen, Vincent" <chenvinc@wharton.upenn.edu> on 02/19/2001 10:39:30 AM
To: "'Larry.Gagliardi@enron.com'" <Larry.Gagliardi@enron.com>
cc: "'Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com'" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>,
"'Kenneth.Parkhill@enron.com'" <Kenneth.Parkhill@enron.com>, "Thorne,
Heather" <hethorne@wharton.upenn.edu>, "'Thomas'"
<Thomas@wharton.upenn.edu>, "Bhalla, Tulika" <bhallat@wharton.upenn.edu>,
"Levitt, Nicholas" <nslevitt@wharton.upenn.edu>, "Mallik, Deepa"
<mallikd@wharton.upenn.edu>, "Rejtman, Jack"  <rejtmanj@wharton.upenn.edu>,
"Whitsel, Kimberly"  <whitselk@wharton.upenn.edu>, "Chen, Vincent"
<chenvinc@wharton.upenn.edu>
Subject: FW: EnronOnline Competitive Assessment by Wharton Project Team

Larry, Ken Parkhill passed your contact info along to our project team. We
plan to call you at 3:15pm EST today (Monday) i.e. 2:15pm Houston time.
Attached is a presentation describing the scope of our project. We are
interested in discussing your experiences with competitor trading exchanges
like ICE, DynegyDirect, HoustonStreet.com, etc. relative to EnronOnline. Look
forward to talking with you today.

Thanks,
Vincent

-----Original Message-----
From: Kenneth.Parkhill@enron.com [mailto:Kenneth.Parkhill@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, February 16, 2001 10:59 AM
To: Bhalla, Tulika; Chen, Vincent; Rejtman, Jack; Mallik, Deepa;
Whitsel, Kimberly; Thorne, Heather; 'Thomas'
Cc: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com; Larry.Gagliardi@enron.com
Subject: RE: research leads

Hello Team 1,

I spoke with Larry Gagliardi on the Crude/Refinery Products desk this
morning and he agreed to talk with you after 12:30 today or after 2:30 any
other weekday.  He is very familiar with the other platforms and should be
a great resource.  Larry suggested that you surf EOL to find names of power
and/or natural gas traders, and call them up.  Please let me know if you
have difficulty finding/contacting folks this way and I will see if I can
help.

Larry's office number is 713-853-0543, and his email is
Larry.Gagliardi@enron.com.

good luck
ken

 - 150201 Enron Conference Call.ppt


---------------------- Forwarded by Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT on 01/08/2001 12:34
PM ---------------------------

"Andurand , Pierre" <Pierre.Andurand@gs.com> on 01/08/2001 02:30:23 AM
To: "'Greg.Whalley@Enron.com'" <Greg.Whalley@Enron.com>
cc:
Subject: US WTI swaps

Greg,
What is the difference between NX1 and NX2 ?
Thanks and best regards,

Pierre

Pierre Andurand

Energy Derivatives Trading
Goldman Sachs - Singapore


Please take care of this
---------------------- Forwarded by John Arnold/HOU/ECT on 09/07/2000 05:25
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Steven Vu                           08/29/2000 02:11 PM

To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject:

John:

Hate to bother you about this again, since you have done it once already.
Please approve me (via Stephanie Sever) to trade Nymex contracts through EOL
on behalf of the Weather Derivatives book.

Thanks

Steven


I must have missed your promotion.  Congratulations!  Atttached is the
certificate so you do not have to retype it.

	Peter Keohane
	08/31/2000 06:07 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Secretarial Certificate

Troublemaker, I am Secretary and and not Assistant of Enron Canada Corp.

P.


Ran into Ed this morning and he said that he ran into your ugly ass this past
weekend.  I told him that it sucks for him but its over so all the better.
He said he was taking notes from the way you dress, thats if he ever went
back to being single again.  Biked, ran and workedout this weekend.  I am on
the path to kicking ass and taking names.  Bring it!!


<http://www.gotlaughs.com/funpages/bin2.cfm>

________________________________
Derek M. Stoldt
Registered Foreign Lawyer
Kaye Scholer LLP
10th Floor
88 Wood Street
London EC2V 7RS
(T) 011-44-(0)-20-8528-1407
(F) 011-44-(0)-20-8528-1206
or 212-836-6532 (direct to computer)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

THIS EMAIL AND ANY ATTACHED FILES ARE CONFIDENTIAL AND MAY BE LEGALLY
PRIVILEGED.

If you are not the addressee, any disclosure, reproduction, copying,
distribution, or use of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you
have received this transmission in error please notify the sender
immediately and then delete this email.

Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error free as
information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late
or incomplete, or contain viruses.  The sender therefore does not accept
liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message which
arise as a result of email transmission.  If verification is required
please request a hard copy version.

Kaye Scholer LLP is a Delaware (USA) Limited Liability Partnership.

A list of the names of the partners and their professional qualifications
is open to inspection at the principal office 88 Wood Street London EC2V
7RS.  The partners are either solicitors or registered foreign lawyers.


pmorrison@nyiso.com writes to the NYISO_TECH_EXCHANGE Discussion List:

Dear Market Participants,

Please note the NYISO online systems will become unavailable tonight
between 7:00 pm (19:00) and 7:15 pm (19:15) for a hardware/software
upgrade to the Internet security systems.

A fallback plan is in place in the event any problems are encountered
so your access to services will resume on schedule.

Regards,
Customer Relations
518-356-6060


can you just let me know one way or the other if his background would be
compatible with anything that might come up?  thanks.


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 11/13/2000
04:43 PM ---------------------------

Kim.Mayers@mail.sprint.com on 11/13/2000 03:54:20 PM
To: crichter@amfm.com, darron.c.giron@enron.com, jcmayers@earthlink.net,
smmayers@earthlink.net
cc:
Subject: FW: different Florida election Ballot

I thought this was a little humorous!

Kim Mayers
Product Manager
Sprint Broadband Wireless Group
Phone: (913) 315-9132
PCS: (913) 269-8197
Fax: (913) 315-0760
kim.mayers@mail.sprint.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Trainer, Brian
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2000 3:47 PM
To: berve; Brady, James S.; Broom, Gerald; Broom, Janis; Byrd, Brenda
W.; Byrd, Brian J.; Franz, Kevin J.; Gampper, James J. PCS.; Garris,
Kathy P.; Garris, Lee J.; Gobea, Paul A.; Jamaleddin, Joe N.; Joyce,
Sean R.; Kierl, Maurine M.; Mayers, Kim L.; McAbee, Karen N.; Miller,
David G. PCS.; Nelson, Gregory G.; pentrain; Peterson, Jim H.; Peterson,
Keri; stevenkari; Trainer, Christa L.; tres
Subject: FW: different Florida election Ballot

-

 - BallotWPBF11__.doc


Please give us a call with any questions.

Stephen M. Benotti
Financial Consultant
Emery Financial Group
713-853-2388 (Direct)
866-753-9556
713-853-2366 (Fax)
sbenott@firstunion1.com

 - Doc14.doc


OK Vince.
Alec at RW and I are ready for you concerning Howard.
Thank you for the information.

Jeff
*************************************

Jeff

 My interview with Howard will be scheduled on a different day.

 Vince

*  Get free, secure online email at http://www.ziplip.com/  *


Published Thursday, November 9, 2000, in the San Jose Mercury News
PG&E seeks OK to recoup billions
UTILITY ASKS COURT
TO ALLOW COLLECTING
EXTRA FROM CUSTOMERS
Associated Press
Pacific Gas & Electric Co., facing dramatic increases in the cost of
wholesale electricity, asked a federal court in San Francisco on Wednesday
for permission to recoup some $3.44 billion in excess charges from its
ratepayers.
The utility, which has 4.5 million customers across the northern part of the
state, said court intervention was necessary ``to protect the company's legal
rights.''
Federal regulators, the state Public Utilities Commission and other
authorities ``have all acknowledged that the current wholesale power market
is broken and not capable of producing competitive wholesale energy prices,''
said Roger Peters, a senior vice president with PG&E.
``However, there has not yet been any concrete action by regulators to
provide for recovery of the costs we have incurred to purchase the power our
customers must have,'' Peters said.
PG&E earlier sought PUC authorization to obtain the costs, but was rebuffed.
Consumer groups have opposed PG&E's cost-recovery plans, saying the utility,
not its customers, should cover the costs.
The utility operates under a rate freeze and is limited as to how much it can
charge its customers. It has paid four- and fivefold higher costs for
wholesale energy, and by law is unable to pass those charges on to its
customers.
The rate freeze will remain in effect until the company completes its
transition to an open market utility under the provisions of a 1996 law that
deregulated California's investor-owned electric utilities. The transition
entails selling off assets and buying energy in a competitive, open market.
San Diego Gas & Electric Co. completed its transition last year. The utility
passed on the huge wholesale price spikes to its 1.2 million customers,
prompting a political outcry and state, federal and local investigations, and
legislation in Sacramento.

PG&E sues to get costs ruling reversed
By Carrie Peyton
Bee Staff Writer
(Published Nov. 9, 2000)

Pacific Gas and Electric Co. sued state regulators in federal court Wednesday
to try to recoup more than $3.4 billion from Northern California electric
customers.
The utility wants to collect, with interest, the money it has paid to
wholesale power suppliers. State regulators are still studying the issue, but
so far have ruled that certain collections are forbidden because electric
rates were temporarily frozen under a 1996 state law.
That line of reasoning is "in defiance of federal law," PG&E attorneys wrote,
asking the U.S. District Court in San Francisco to order the state Public
Utilities Commission to reverse its stand.
PUC rulings have "caused PG&E severe financial harm and threaten the safety
and reliability of the state's electrical supply," PG&E's request for a
federal injunction said.
Wednesday's action takes PG&E's drive to collect higher rates into a third
arena, with a fourth -- the state Legislature -- widely expected to get
involved soon.
PG&E has already asked the PUC for permission to collect more money, and it
has already appealed one unfavorable PUC decision as far as the state Supreme
Court, where it is still pending. The latest step surprised no one.
"It's the very suit we expected," said Timothy Sullivan, adviser to PUC
Commissioner Henry Duque.
PG&E said it still wants to work with policy makers to find ways to bring
sky-high wholesale electricity prices back down to earth.
"We have taken every step the state would allow to try to keep power costs
down," general counsel Roger Peters said in a prepared statement, but the
latest court action is critical for "protecting our financial viability."
The legal theory that PG&E is using has not been tested under circumstances
of a partly deregulated electricity market, said Nettie Hoge, executive
director of The Utility Reform Network, a consumer group.
"I think they're dreaming. Maybe they should go to the World Court next," she
said.


Mark, this is the index I have prepared for the documents Alan brought back
from New York.  Our document clerk is placing the documents in binders right
now and if there are any additional copies you would like please let me
know.  Also, I am attaching the ENA telephone contact list.