Transmission Expansion and Systems in Transition  Conference
Feb. 5-8, 2002,  Miami, Florida

OVERVIEW

This conference will examine the  business and regulatory challenges to U.S. electric systems in transition in  effectively expanding transmission capacity to meet new demands in the larger  and more competitive regional markets emerging under FERC's RTO  initiatives.  The conference will  review the parameters of these challenges and possible solutions to them.  It will examine technology options and  new business models for transmission expansion.  It will analyze emerging proposals for  effective transmission planning and pricing, including market-based pricing  alternatives to FERC's traditional pricing methods. The conference will also  discuss what it will take in legislative action and regulatory initiative to  achieve an efficient regime for ensuring that the nation has a reliable grid and  regional trading system.

The brochure for the Conference and associated  Workshops can be obtained by  clicking on the link below:http://www.euci.com/pdf/trans_expn.pdf

Electricity  Market Design Conference

March  25-26, 2002, Atlanta, Georgia

OVERVIEW

This Conference will focus on how to design  competitive electricity markets that maximize the benefits to consumers while at  the same time maintaining the financial viability of companies participating in  these markets.

The brochure for the Electricity Market Design  Conference, March 25-26, 2002,  Wyndham Hotel Downtown, Atlanta, GA can be obtained by clicking on the link  below:http://www.euci.com/pdf/MrktDesgn.pdf

Power  Generation Asset and Portfolio Management Conference

March  26-28 2002, Atlanta, Georgia

OVERVIEW

This conference will highlight the commonalties and  common applications between the asset management processes used throughout the  enterprise.  The conference will  emphasize the need to link the physical power generation asset management  processes to the activities and processes of the trading and marketing  process.  The processes of Asset  management will be addressed from three distinct perspectives, first, the  long-term perspective of portfolio developers, second the more medium term  perspective of maintenance/system planners and third the conference will link  short term issues of the trading & marketing departments. The purpose is to  show how these processes can be integrated to the individual assets (plants) in  order to provide consistent and profitable strategies for the generation asset  owner.

The brochure for the Power Generation Asset and  Portfolio Management Conference,  March 26-28, 2002, Wyndham Hotel Downtown, Atlanta, GA can be obtained by  clicking on the link below:
 http://www.euci.com/pdf/powergeneration.pdf

Ancillary  Services Conference

April  10-12, 2002, Denver, Colorado

OVERVIEW

As more and more regions in North  America open wholesale markets to competition, the importance of ancillary  services is increasingly recognized. These services, generally provided by the  same generators that produce the competitive energy product, are vital for both  commerce and reliability.

This conference will cover the key  engineering, economic, market, and policy issues associated with these  functions. The conference will also present updates on the status of the various  markets (including market design and operation problems and their solutions,  successes, prices and costs) in North America. These markets include New  England, New York, PJM, ERCOT, and Alberta. Developing markets, such as Ontario,  will also be covered. The market designs encompass issues such as day-ahead  scheduling, real-time operation, integration with the markets for energy and  congestion, measuring the real-time delivery of these services, the operating  costs to produce these services, and the potential for customer loads to supply  these services.

The brochure for the Ancillary Services  Conference, April 10-12, 2002,  Wyndham Hotel - Tech Center, Denver, CO can be obtained by clicking on the link  below:http://www.euci.com/pdf/anc_svcs.pdf

Please print the brochure and fax the registration  form back to us at 303-741-0849 if you would like to attend any of these events.  You can also register by calling us at 303-770-8800 or online.

We have updated our website to include new conference  proceedings on recently-held "Electric Power Market Performance",  "Performance-Based Ratemaking", "Ancillary Services", "Performance Management  for Electric Distribution Companies", "Power Generation Asset Management", and  "Power T&D Asset Management" conferences. Please visit www.euci.com  and review the conference  proceedings section for these and other proceedings.

Kindly  forward this announcement to your colleagues who might benefit from attending  these events.

Best  Regards,
L.  Mrig
Electric  Utility Consultants, Inc. (EUCI)
5555  Preserve Drive
Greenwood  Village CO 80121
Tel:  303-770-8800
Fax:  303-741-0849lmrig@euci.com


lets discuss need gorte as well. rick

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Port, David
Sent:	Wednesday, October 10, 2001 2:56 PM
To:	Buy, Rick
Subject:	Raptor Lessons

Amongst my take-aways from the A&F Comm meetings was Blake's request for a "lessons learned" session on Raptor. Should we put something together?


Based on the response below and and the other responses to Ed Cattigan's message, and assuming this has been approved by the attorney, I agree with the proposal. Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: Astramowicz, Jarek
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 3:46 AM
To: Cattigan, Ed; Overfield, Adam; Forycki, Krzysztof; Edgley, Anne;
Wantschek, Lloyd; Derrick Jr., James
Cc: Glowacki, Jacek; Martin, Sophie; Hackett, Christian; Willott, Carys;
Muscroft, Brian; Parrish, Paul E.
Subject: RE: ENS - Draft Form of Acceptance

I agree with your proposal - this is probably the best we could do anyway.

I think you have done a piece of good but frustrating work there.

Jarek

-----Original Message-----
From: Cattigan, Ed
Sent: 26 November 2001 15:30
To: Astramowicz, Jarek; Overfield, Adam; Forycki, Krzysztof; Edgley,
Anne; Wantschek, Lloyd; Derrick Jr., James
Cc: Glowacki, Jacek; Martin, Sophie; Hackett, Christian; Willott, Carys;
Muscroft, Brian; Parrish, Paul E.
Subject: FW: ENS - Draft Form of Acceptance

Good Afternoon

Attached are 2 documents in relation to final Settlement of the outstanding Delay in Start up (relating to the replacement of the previously damaged rotor) claim. One is a detailed history of the claim and the other a final acceptance notice proposed by the brokers.

I have been negotiating the outstanding portion of the claim now for nearly 9 months and believe that due to the circumstance surrounding the late delivery of the rotor and the advice of external council this settlement is acceptable to ENS. Will you please advise wether you agree with accepting this sum as full and final settlement.

In way of context this settlement is $750k of a possible $901k an 83% success on a claim we had been advised would not have been worth taking to arbitration if the insurers had become difficult.

regards

Ed

Sophie. Could you please confirm that you are happy with the wording of the acceptance notice.
NOTE I would really like to complete this by Wednesday this week as this is my last week.

-----Original Message-----
From: BODIMEADE, Alfred [mailto:ABodimeade@heathlambert.com]
Sent: 26 November 2001 10:34
To: 'Ed Cattigan'
Subject: FW: ENS - Draft Form of Acceptance

Ed
Let me know a.s.a.p. if you have any problem.
I think the figures are correct.
Alf


Attached are the Chicago prices.  The Michcon and Consumers are coming later.


Phillip,
I'll be down in about twenty minutes.
Zac


Steve, write these down in pencil - I need a chance to review.

thanks
Dave
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 02/06/2001
07:09 PM ---------------------------

Dan Leff@EES
02/06/2001 04:31 PM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: 2001 EES Goals

Steve -

Per your request.

Regards - Dan


Hi Carolyn.  I'm running the numbers and the rest of you, team, are
responsible
for the strategy and interpretation of the numbers for case 2.  Case 1 was
fine.
I have a few questions for our beloved professor and when she responds I'll
e-mail out my spreadsheet models.

**********************************************
Mark D. Guinney, CFA
Consultant
Watson Wyatt Investment Consulting
345 California Street, Ste. 1400
San Francisco, CA  94104
(415) 733-4487 ph.
(415) 733-4190 fax


Galen's home address is as follows.  Several people had asked for it to
send cards.  I am sure he would appreicate the thoughts and prayers.

Home Address
10622 Endicott Lane
Houston, TX  77318

Thanks. Lynn


thx for the update.  funny how the banks will deal with us and ospraie won't.  oh well, nothing we can do.

-----Original Message-----
From: Abramo, Caroline
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 10:43 PM
To: Arnold, John
Subject: EQUITY COMMENTS

Hi- thought you'd want to know some of the recent equity comments from a few of the funds.  Bad comments first.. ENE: Ospraie, one of the Tudor funds has actually been reducing all their trading exposure to us becuase of our "credit situation".  At one point they probably had a 12,000 contract short gas position with us where we might have 1000 lots on now.  They have studied our financials for the last 2 years and like the rest of wall street can not determine how to value us.. I think the bigger concern though is our credit line situation.  Its been leaked that the availability of our borrowing is linked to stock price.. obviously the street does not know the real details but the fact these rumors are out there and lack of statements by us to the contrary are causing some to panic.  I've heard the same come out of SAC which is a 5 B equity shop who also put on the favorite short-ENE.  SAC has just started trading with us.

I am not sure what to do about this.. luckily Ospraie is the only group commenting on our credit.  I am not having any problems YET with any of the banks except CSFB- and thats not new.. I have not been able to trade with them for the last year.  I am anticipating problems which is why I am trying to work out a clearing system in the interim.

I am sure Ken will do a better job of putting some of these fears to rest.. and the street will be able to assign us a PE in line with other trading companies (8-10) plus some growth component (5) for developing businesses.  And at $20, they reckon we get taken out anyway.. the fact remains that Enron has major franchise value.

Good news- Ospraie covered their short at $30 when PGE resiolution came out Thursday and we rallied $4.

Other comments from Catequil.. they generally think a lot of the energy sector (E+Ps) are close to bottom.  They also commented that they are likely to buy El Paso at a 10.5 PE soon (even though ours is currently 12.5 and they believe in us) because they just have more access to El Paso Sr Mgmt and understand their biz better.  (Lot of El Paso and Dynegy support out there).  They were never short us.

On other names:
EOG- could see it down to $22 but see $35 based on NAV more realistic.  Like EOG and Chesapeake- well hedged.

Also like Philips/ Statoil on the Alaskan gas play as well as the fact that they have 0 mid-east exposure.

Like Talisman- only has exposure in Sydan, Nexus- Yemen


Thanks!!

Dan J Hyvl
05/25/2001 08:29 AM
To: Lee L Papayoti/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Rudwell Johnson/Enron@EnronXGate
Subject: Re: Roche Vitamins, Inc. - Freeport

Lee,
 Please review the attached GTC confirm to see if this is what you want.  I
talked to Darren Vanek about this last evening and he had no problem in
structuring the transaction in this manner.

	Lee L Papayoti
	05/23/2001 03:54 PM

		 To: Rudwell Johnson/NA/Enron, Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Roche Vitamins, Inc. - Freeport

I am working with Roche Vitamins, who are trying to trigger a fixed price for
the remaining term of their HPL contract, from June01 to Feb02.  They want to
trigger a fixed price for about 400 MMBtu/d.

Rudwell - we discussed a collateral threshold of $100,000 with this entity,
based on the limited information that we have received from this privately
held company.  I assume this is still correct?

Dan - could you send me some draft language that we would insert into the HPL
contract for the collateral threshold matter???  It is a typical HPL physical
contract (HPL already has the right to request payment securities for good
cause) - if you don't already have a copy of the contract, let me know and
I'll fax it to you.

Roche want to review the language and get it approved internally before doing
anything.

Thanks

Lee


ok

Cindy Olson
05/08/2001 11:48 AM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: part time/reduced hour employees

Steve, I think we have consensus on how we would like the part ttime people
handled in the PRS process for mid year.....okay.
---------------------- Forwarded by Cindy Olson/Corp/Enron on 05/08/2001
11:41 AM ---------------------------
From: Gina Corteselli/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/06/2001 04:10 PM
To: Cindy Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: David Oxley/ENRON@enronXgate

Subject: part time/reduced hour employees

Cindy I chatted with Elyse (Elizabeth Labanowski never returned my calls or
messages) on the pt/rh issue.   Elyse is in favor of having the pt/rh
employees in the regular PRC process, with education for managers and at
facilitator training and a statement in the ground rules to ensure that they
are not penalized or otherwise disadvantaged by the process.

David and I discussed this option which he is in favor of it as well.  In the
meantime for year end we will be ready with a system change to allow us to
see pt/rh employees on the screen segregated from the full timers- and to
have a live chart of pt/rh employees as well as the full timers.  We can't do
that for mid-year because it requires a good deal of programming, but it is a
feature we can incorporate at year end.

what do you think?

Gina


riday July 7, 11:43 am Eastern Time

Company Press Release

SOURCE: Columbia Gas Transmission

Columbia Gas Transmission Files Innovative Capacity Auction
Process With FERC

FAIRFAX, Va., July 7 /PRNewswire/ -- Continuing its quest to promote creative
regulatory policies, Columbia Gas Transmission, a wholly owned
subsidiary of Columbia Energy Group, has urged the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission to consider an interactive, Internet-based pipeline capacity
auction process that enhances Columbia's current open auction process.

In a first of its kind filing, Columbia proposes a ``bid/offer'' system for
selling capacity similar to on-line natural gas commodity trading systems.
The filing
was made in response to customer concerns with the current process and is
consistent with sentiments expressed in FERC's Order 637, which
encourages companies to voluntarily submit ``new and innovative approaches''
to capacity auctions. Since the filing is not required under Order 637,
Columbia's proposed auction is separate from Columbia's Order 637 compliance
filing made June 15.

``Under the current mechanism, capacity is not always awarded to the party
that places the highest value on it,'' said Carl Levander, vice-president of
Rates and Regulatory Policy for Columbia Gas Transmission. ``Even though we
conduct our current capacity auction over a five-day period, parties often
wait until the last 15 minutes to place a bid. Also, since the current
process is based on set time periods, customers often call us back after the
auction is
closed saying they valued the capacity greater than the winning bid.''

According to Levander, Columbia's proposal addresses these concerns by moving
to an enhanced, Internet-based interactive auction that takes into
consideration such current market conditions as daily fluctuations in
capacity value and the increased level of auction activity due to shorter-term
contracts.

Under Columbia's proposed ``bid/offer'' system, Columbia would ``offer'' (via
its electronic bulletin board) sales terms for all its available firm
capacity.
Customers can then match all asking sales terms for any portion of the
quantity and a sale is immediate and binding. If Columbia offers discounted
capacity, the customer can counter-offer with a different rate. Or, if
Columbia offers maximum rate capacity, then a customer can counter-offer with
a
different term length. Columbia can match the highest bid, subject to a
present value process, and the sale is immediate and binding. At any time
before a
binding sale, the customer can change or withdraw its bid.

Columbia's ``bid/offer'' auction proposal meets the six basic principles
outlined in FERC's Order 637.

    *     Columbia's auction has predictable timing since the auction will
          begin each day at 9:15 a.m. (EST) and all available capacity will be
          posted prior to 8:00 a.m. (EST).
    *     The auction will be open to all creditworthy bidders on a non-
          discriminatory basis.
    *     The auction is user-friendly since it will use Columbia's existing
          EBB format. All information concerning rules and procedures will be
          made available on the Internet.
    *     The method of selecting the best bid will be easily understood since
          bidders will only be able to change one variable with respect to
          each capacity package made available.
    *     As is Columbia's current practice, winning bids and the bidder's
          identity will be posted to permit monitoring of how the selection
          criteria were applied.
    *     The bidding process will be transparent to all parties since all
          bids (without the bidder's identity) will be available for review to
          all bidders through an Internet-based system.

``We believe the combination of these factors will ensure that the capacity
auction format is 'transparent, verifiable, and non-discriminatory' to all
parties
as well as innovative in design,'' Levander said.

Levander said the proposal not only meets the Commission's principles, it is
based on feedback gathered from customers, who expressed a desire for
transparent market information; shorter auction periods; an ability to
withdraw and change bids; and a real-time, immediate closure process.

Columbia Gas Transmission, with offices in Charleston, W.Va., and Fairfax,
Va., moves an average of three billion cubic feet of natural gas per day to
markets along a 12,550-mile pipeline network, which reaches across 10
Midwestern, Northeastern and mid-Atlantic states. The company operates one
of the largest natural gas storage systems in the country with over 240
billion cubic feet (Bcf) of working capacity.

Columbia Energy Group, based in Herndon, Va., is one of the nation's leading
energy services companies, with assets of approximately $7 billion. Its
operating companies engage in nearly all phases of the natural gas business,
including exploration and production, transmission, storage and distribution,
as well as retail energy marketing, propane and petroleum product sales, and
electric power generation. Information about Columbia Energy Group
(NYSE: CG - news) is available on the Internet at
http://www.columbiaenergygroup.com.

SOURCE: Columbia Gas Transmission

                                      Email this story - View most popular
stories emailed

 More Quotes and News:
                     Columbia Energy Group (NYSE:CG - news)
 Related News Categories: government, internet, oil/energy, utilities

                                                               Help

                               Copyright , 2000 Yahoo! All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service
    Copyright 2000 PRNewswire. All rights reserved. Republication or
redistribution of PRNewswire content is expressly prohibited without the
prior written consent of
                PRNewswire. PRNewswire shall not be liable for any errors or
delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.
                                                  Questi


These deals have unwind legs, I am pulling the tickets to send you the corresponding deal #'s.  The unwinds were done this way per the central orig group.  I am faxing you our copies as soon as we get them.
Bruce

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Anderson, Diane
Sent:	Friday, October 19, 2001 1:38 PM
To:	Mills, Bruce; Brady, Edward
Cc:	Giron, Darron C.; Ornelas, Bianca
Subject:	Twister Unwinds

 Hi Bruce/Edward -

I am preparing the Termination for the Twister deal below.  Can you kill or zero out (whichever is applicable to the particular deal) the effected deals in TAGG, and also put a comment on the annuity leg to reflect which deals that payment references?

VL2515.1 should be killed
Y05186.2 should be killed

VN4969.1 partially terminated (Oct 01- Nov 01 only)
VU4647.1 partially terminated (Oct 01 - Dec 01 only)
Y05186.1 partially terminated (Oct 01 - Dec 01 only)

And the annuity leg Y05186.7 should have a comment reflecting that this payment is for the termination of these deals.

Thanks,
Diane

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Giron, Darron C.
Sent:	Tuesday, October 16, 2001 1:14 PM
To:	Anderson, Diane
Subject:	Heartland and Twister Unwinds

Diane,

Heartland Energy Group, Inc.
We essentially terminated VU4418.1 and VZ4240.1 on 9/24/01 and paid them $69,200 on 9/26/01 which is in VZ4240.3

Twister Gas Services, LLC
This is more complicated.  We terminated VL2515.1 and Y05186.2 totally.  We partially terminated VN4969.1 (Oct-01 & Nov-01 only), VU4647.1 (Oct-01 thru Dec-01 only), and Y05186.1 (Oct-01 thru Dec-01 only).  They were terminated on 9/24/01 and they were paid $116,700 on 9/26/01 which is in Y05186.7

I sent a fax to 713-646-2495 of the Termination Agreement they have for a prior deal.  They want one similar to this for these two deals.  Please call if you have any questions.  I appreciate your help.

DG
3-9573


you forward this to wolfe, belden & co.?


Janet,

Thanks for your response on this.  All of these applications are indeed being
used in Houston.  They have been in use for a couple of years.  I am not sure
of the best method to get them going here in London but I will leave that up
to you and the rest of Enron's capable IT team.  Julie Pechersky has been
helping me coordinate the installs as her group is responsilbe for
maintaining these apps in Houston.  Cyrus Kazak has been working to get the
Autex system going here.  Both Instinet and ITG/Posit are in the midst of
some contractual issues which are being negotiated by Sara Shackleton in our
legal group in Houston.

I will include you in any correspondence regarding these applications going
forward.

Thanks and regards,
John

Janet Rawson
26/10/2000 08:59
To: John Greene/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Apps for Win2k

Hi John,

In a mail to Judi, you mentioned 3 new apps :

Instinet/OMS
ITG/Posit
Autex

I have searched on the London servers for these 3 but can not find a version
currently being used by NT4, or the source files to capture a new install.

You mentioned that these 3 may be used in Houston, so I will endeavour to
find these apps today and pull them from the Houston servers.

In the meantime, can you please provide me with the version numbers for each
app so we can ensure that we give you the correct product. Also, if you have
the source files for any of the products above, please let me know as a fresh
capture of the install is likely to be much easier than the conversion from
Houston.

Thanks,
Janet


Vicki & Evan --

Please see the e-mail trail below.  The PAPUC has assessed EES $147,000 for its costs.  We intend to protest.  Do you have any idea of who this bill would go to?

Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: Hoatson, Tom
Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2001 10:09 AM
To: Nicolay, Christi L.; Montovano, Steve
Cc: Steffes, James D.; 'kmoody@wolfblock.com'; Moore, Janet H.
Subject: RE: ASAP!! EES' objections to PaPUC assessment of $147,000

I will talk with Kevin on Tuesday (we have traded phone calls) and get this done.  I may need some help in identifying who in EES might have the assessment and fax it to Kevin.  I will keep you informed.

-----Original Message-----
From: Nicolay, Christi L.
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 5:24 PM
To: Hoatson, Tom; Montovano, Steve
Cc: Steffes, James D.; 'kmoody@wolfblock.com'; Moore, Janet H.
Subject: ASAP!! EES' objections to PaPUC assessment of $147,000

Tom/Steve -- Janet Moore (the ENA attorney) is on vacation, so cannot handle.  I do not know if Enron has received the assessment, but in an abundance of caution, this objection probably needs to be filed on Tues. 9/4 (per Kevin Moody).  Please call me if one of you knows about this and can take care of it, otherwise I'll get it done on Tues.

Jim --do you know who at EES may have gotten this.  MAIN THING IS THAT THE VERIFICATION NEEDS TO BE DONE--CURRENTLY IN TOM HOATSON'S NAME.  (Also, may need an RCR)
Thanks.  Christi wk 713-853-7007   home 713-853-7007

-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin J. Moody [mailto:KMoody@wolfblock.com]
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 4:17 PM
To: Nicolay, Christi L.
Subject: Enron Energy Services' objections to PaPUC assessment

Christie, below is the message I sent to Tom. Attached are the objections. I'll call you Tuesday morning to see where things stand on this.
____________________________________

Tom, the PaPUC has recently assessed gas marketers for the regulatory expenses for the PUC, the OCA and the OSBA. Enron Energy Services' assessment for all three is $147,277.

Unless you tell us to the contrary, we assume that you want us to file objections to the assessments. Attached are objections that we have prepared. Can you please fax us a copy of the assessment notice Enron received? We believe the assesments may have been received around 8/19-8/21.

Objections must be filed within fifteen (15) days of receipt of the assessment notice.  The 15-day objection period begins on the date the certified mail return receipt is signed.  If the 15th day falls on a weekend or a legal holiday, the last date for filing is extended to the next business day.

The statutes require the assessments to be paid within 30 days of receipt, even though objections are filed.  The payments must be made "under protest" in order to be refunded under the statutory procedure, which we believe is inadequate.

We are attempting to avoid the payment obligation thru a preliminary injunction request in Commonwealth Court, but we have no assurance that the court will act before the 30th day for payment.  If not, the assessment must be paid under protest.  If necessary, we will provide a cover letter for the protest payment to the PUC.

Please call me if you have any questions or comments. Thanks.

Kevin J. Moody, Esq.
Wolf, Block, Schorr and Solis-Cohen LLP
212 Locust Street, Suite 300
Harrisburg, PA  17101
(717) 237-7187
(717) 237-7161 (fax)

This electronic message contains information from the law firm of Wolf, Block, Schorr and Solis-Cohen LLP that may be privileged and confidential.  The information is intended to be for the use of the addressee only.  If you are not the addressee, note that any disclosure, copy, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is prohibited.


John, I read Phil's statements concerning the Redrock air permit issue and
would like to make sure everyone has the facts why  Transwestern was unaware
of the delay in the agencies issance of the air permits.  I had met with each
agency prior to submitting each application (February of this year) to ensure
that each application contained the correct and proper information required
by the EPA and State of Arizona.  When I told them that we would need the
permits by the end of September, each agency indicated that a September
permit issuance would not be a problem, in light of the fact that energy
issues related to California were to be given top priority.   On a monthly
basis I phoned the  permit engineer assigned to each application to be kept
aware of possible conflicts and resolve any concerns.  In all monthly calls,
both agencies assured me that the permits were progressing on schedule and no
delays were expected .  As we approached the anticipated September issuance
date, calls to the agencies were conducted weekly and this was when I was
first informed of the 1-4 month additional time beyond the September issuance
which would be required for the permit issuance.

In light of this issue, we in ETS might want to use this as a training
exercise and develop a protocol that the other DES's should apply to stay on
track with the permit progress for construction projects.

From: John Shafer/ENRON@enronXgate on 09/16/2001 09:07 PM CDT
To: Phil Lowry/ENRON@enronXgate, Jerry D Martin/ENRON@enronXgate
cc: Louis Soldano/ENRON@enronXgate, William Kendrick/ENRON@enronXgate, Larry
Campbell/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ruth Jensen/ENRON@enronXgate, Richard
Melton/ENRON@enronXgate

Subject: RE: Red Rock Air Permits Heads up!

Phil,
I agree with your assessment, but would offer some additional information.;
After returning from Austin on Wednesday and learning that Larry Campbell
had;received a negative reaction from EPA Region IX concerning a possible
meeting with them, I worked on this issue most of Thursday and Friday.; The
strategy I discussed with Lou was to locate a local Arizona or California
"political/lawyer" type;who would have the necessary contacts to get us in
there and get the permits moving.; Lou agreed and we have been working on
that strategy while gathering more information related to the "right" contact
that could get this job done.; I personally have had lengthy discussions
(Thursday and Friday) with Lou, Larry Campbell, Bill Kendrick and several key
consultants that have extensive contacts within both Arizona and
California.;We are closing in on a;local law firm and also a "high level;air
consultant";who will be able to get us in at the Director or Air Permit Chief
level;to present (1) our;situation, (2) clean air needs for Arizona and CA,
and (3) how long these permits have already been on file.; We should have
someone identified early this next week.;
;
Let me present the following information to;complement yours:
* ;The permitting timeline;being used;was based on historical
timelines;encountered;while processing prior Arizona projects.; No indication
of backlogs or slower processing in the beginning.; A familiar consultant
(Argent);was used for the air permit applications and no indication was
offered by the AZ DEQ or EPA Region IX that normal processing was not
occurring.; Applications filed in March, 2001 and by letter from the agencies
were deemed complete by mid-April.
* Within the last two weeks, the Arizona DEQ Permit Engineer assigned to the
applications for Station 1 and 2 has stated that he is overloaded and working
on the applications as they are in the "que".; He told Larry Campbell (and I
have verified;it also by talking to outside consultants that permit in
Arizona) that this is true and the AZ DEQ have been very slow lately in
getting permits out. (Caveat: One of the suggestions we want to carry in to
AZ DEQ is that we would be willing to pay for a third-party contractor to
take the permits and work them up;for release to the publishing firm so they
can be sent out for public comment.; AZ DEQ is willing to meet with us and
discuss our applications.);; Even if we get this part going, this is only
part of the problem.; Bottom line is;we must play our cards;correctly at this
juncture to be able to get our applications moved up in the que, typed, and
out for public comment; but EPA Region IX will still have thirty days after
that for their review of those two state issued permits.
* EPA Region IX is a different story.; It is most difficult to put pressure
on them, more so than AZ DEQ.; The applications for Stations 3 and 4 are on
tribal land and these;applications are not delegated to any state air quality
department.;;After the technical meetings in the office last week, Larry made
a couple of calls;to the Permit Engineer;in Region IX and received a negative
response.; Larry was told that the;permits would issue in one to four months
and that;there was no need for a meeting with them.; Again,;my advice at this
point is to find the right person with the right contacts at a very high
level and get the meeting set.; It's one thing to pressure the State of
Arizona and get a permit applications moving; but if we are not very careful
with Region IX we could damage our ability to not only get Sun Devil's
permits, but create audits and compliance situations that are far reaching.;
Again, we must first get a personal meeting with them;to enable us to
present;the need, circumstances, and how long these permits have already been
on file.; Locating the;correct person to help us do that is of upmost
importance!
* Clarifying the complicated point, EPA Region IX has responsibility
to;review and publish not only the permits for Stations 3 and 4, but to also
review the AZ DEQ permits for stations 1 and;2 for 30 days.; Therefore, if we
anger EPA Region IX over permits for Stations;3 and 4, they could delay the
issuance of the permits for Stations 1 and 2 that;have been expedited with
the AZ DEQ.; It's a two-edged sword.
Our Strategy:
* Continue to work on the technical staff permit engineers, but very
carefully.; Indications are that our phone calls are beginning to annoy them.
* Locate a political/lawyer type that has connections at the top of AZ DEQ
and EPA Region IX to help us get the;desired meeting with key;people in order
to;move;the permits.; This should be done within the next week.
* Offer to assist in any manner (e.g., funding a third party) to get the
permit applications moving out of AZ DEQ and EPA Region IX for public comment.
I have some strategic ideas that will increase the;probability that this type
of circumstance will not occur in the future.; I will be glad to discuss any
of this with you on Monday morning.; John Shafer
;
-----Original Message-----
From: Lowry, Phil
Sent: Sun 9/16/2001 8:56 AM
To: Martin, Jerry D.
Cc: Shafer, John
Subject: Red Rock Air Permits Heads up!

At Stan,s staff meeting last week, the discovery of a delay in the issuance
of Air Permits was discussed.; Stan indicated that this was unacceptable.; I
requested that you conduct a meeting that afternoon with key people to
outline a plan of attack to get the permit schedule back on track.; I am
aware that you did such and you provided a voice mail update that indicated a
plan.
;
Here is the problem.; Apparently the matter was further discussed at the
weekly Red Rock status meeting on Friday and the following feedback was
provided by a &little birdie8.; We can expect another unpleasant discussion
at Monday,s 8am meeting with Stan.
;
* Joe Hartsoe has been unable to pursue any discussion with Washington
officials to put pressure on Arizona.; WTC attacks!
* Operations is unwilling to put much pressure on Arizona/EPA out of concern
for future responsiveness from the agency Re: Sun Devil
* Sun Devil is a bird in the bush and Red Rock is a bird in the hand.
* There is no way that we can get the Red Rock project completed as promised
because we waited until it was too late to find out what was going on with
the Air Permits.
* The agency will not allow a bifurcation of the project and let us proceed
with on site construction prior to a permit and delay delivery of the
compressor to the site.
* We haven,t yet had any contact with the agency after the discussion last
Monday.
;
;
;
;

;
;


Please locate Jody Pierce's fax number, and send it to Peter.

Thanks,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 01/10/2001 03:48
PM ---------------------------

"Thompson, Peter J." <peterthompson@akllp.com> on 01/10/2001 03:09:55 PM
To: <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: RE: invoice information/TurboPark

What is Jody's fax #?

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2001 3:29 PM
To: Thompson, Peter J.
Subject: RE: invoice information/TurboPark

---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 01/10/2001
02:29
PM ---------------------------

Kay Mann
01/10/2001 01:56 PM

To:   michael.barnas@ps.ge.com
cc:

Subject:  RE: invoice information/TurboPark

---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 01/10/2001
01:55
PM ---------------------------

Kay Mann
01/10/2001 01:51 PM

To:   stephen.swift@ps.ge.com, mike.barnas@ps.ge.com
cc:

Subject:  RE: invoice information/TurboPark

Viola!
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 01/10/2001
01:50
PM ---------------------------

Kay Mann
01/03/2001 11:18 AM

To:   lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com
cc:

Subject:  RE: invoice information/TurboPark  (Document link: Kay Mann)

Lee,

The best way to go about it would be to send the invoice to Jody, but
copy
the Enron project folks you have been dealing with.

Are we ready to sign the Fountain Valley contract?  I would think that
we
could sign the change order at the same time, and payment terms can be
whatever the Enron project team has bought in to.  The banks won't care.

Have you seen sig pages for ESA yet?

Kay

lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com on 01/03/2001 09:00:30 AM

To:   Kay.Mann@enron.com
cc:

Subject:  RE: invoice information/TurboPark

Kay,

Please confirm that this will be the invoicing address for the 6 units
bound
for Fountain Valley Project and 4 units pegged to LV Cogen Expansion.
Also,
we've still got a change order needed for Fountain Valley for the 6
Power
System Stabilizers and 2 Exhaust Stacks.  LV is also saying they will
need
4
Power System Stabilizers, but haven't confirmed their order.

Thanks,

Lee

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2001 6:06 PM
To: lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com
Subject: invoice information/TurboPark

E-Next Generation LLC
Mr. Jody Pierce
1400 Smith, EB 2480
Houston, Tx 77002


Rick-

Thanks for the DASH for the Harvard case study.

I know that you changed the name and some numbers, but I just wanted to check
that you are comfortable with it being included as an example in a study that
will be published and taught.

Please confirm.

Thanks.

Mike


please forward to everyone in our group.
---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Neal/HOU/ECT on 10/30/2000 03:55 PM
---------------------------

Eric Thode@ENRON
10/30/2000 02:55 PM
To: Airam Arteaga/HOU/ECT@ECT, Felecia Russell/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kimberly
Brown/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laura Harder/Corp/Enron@Enron, Becky Young/NA/Enron@Enron,
Ina Rangel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Crystal Blair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eloy
Escobar/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Heather Choate/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daniel
Quezada/Corp/Enron@Enron, Brandee Jackson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Alex
Saldana/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pamela Sonnier/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin G Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Elizabeth Soto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Irena D Hogan/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas A
Martin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fred Lagrasta/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Craig Breslau/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Fllor Meeting with Jeff Skilling

Attached is a memo from Jeff Skilling, which should be distributed via e-mail
and/or hard copy to all employees on EB 32.  Please distribute to the
employees in your group and encourage them to attend.

It announces a floor meeting on Wednesday, November 1 from 3:30 pm to 4:30
pm.  Jeff Skilling will be there to share information about Enron and to
answer questions from employees.  The location for this meeting is near EB
3273A.

If you have any questions, please call me at ext. 3-9053.


http://ersys.corp.enron.com/dpr/index.asp

http://gasfundy.dev.corp.enron.com/gas/framework/default.asp


To recap what we talked about this morning.  The following deals were done for June.  ENA is not showing these deals in you system so therefore they won't pay.

6/7	sold 8500 to ENA @ 3.71	between Roger & Daren
6/12	sold 8500 to ENA @ 3.78	between Roger & Daren
6/14	sold 5000 to ENA @ 4.16	between Roger & Daren
6/20	sold 10000 to EOL @ 3.95	between Roger & EOL
6/23-25	sold 10000/d to EOL @ 3.57	between Roger & EOL

Thank you, in advance, for your help with this.


Hi, Gordon!

Will you send us a copy of the termination when it is sent to Grupo MINSA?

Thanks!

Marie

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Espinoza, Veronica
Sent:	Wednesday, July 18, 2001 12:45 PM
To:	Bailey, Susan; Heard, Marie; Panus, Stephanie
Cc:	Leite, Francisco Pinto; Bailey, Derek
Subject:	Termination agreement--Grupo MINSA

A deal was closed yesterday, 7/17/01 with Grupo MINSA (deal #VG5833.3).  Please prepare a termination agreement (to replace the Deemed ISDA usually sent out as the confirm).

Thanks again--Veronica

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Espinoza, Veronica
Sent:	Friday, June 15, 2001 3:53 PM
To:	Panus, Stephanie; Heard, Marie; Bailey, Susan
Cc:	Leite, Francisco Pinto; Heaney, Gordon
Subject:	Credit Worksheet--Grupo MINSA

Legal Team--

Attached below is a credit worksheet for deal #VG5833.1, trade date 6/12/01, executed with Grupo MINSA, SA de CV.  Please prepare a Deemed ISDA confirmation.

Thanks,

Veronica Espinoza


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	John-Home Pilot, Night Owl Mtg. conference room 4194 attendees: B. Miller, A. Mulligan, L. Cramer, J. McDaniel, M, Locknar, S. Walden.

Date:		10/16/2000
Time:		1:30 PM - 2:30 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


---------------------- Forwarded by Jeff Nogid/HOU/ECT on 08/18/2000 11:26 AM
---------------------------

michael.c.ladas@db.com on 07/21/2000 03:56:22 PM
To: jeff.nogid@enron.com
cc: kenichi.shoji@db.com
Subject: Issuer Forward Transactions

Jeff - per our conversation today, I have attached a basic equity forward
confirm (note that this is our generic form and will be modified to suit
the contract that we enter into) .  I have also attached a document
discussing a proprietary way that we have developed to enter into tax
deductible forwards.  I look forward to working with you further with
regard to this transaction

Best regards,

Mike Ladas
Vice President
Strategic Equity Transactions Group
p:212.469.8572 / f.212.469.4935

(See attached file: Tax Deductible Forward.doc)(See attached file: Issuer
Forward - quarterly resets - ENE.doc)

 - Tax Deductible Forward.doc
 - Issuer Forward - quarterly resets - ENE.doc


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 01/25/2001
08:53 AM ---------------------------

<support@goalamo.com> on 01/25/2001 08:44:57 AM
To: <dgiron@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Your Alamo.com Reservation Confirmation

Darron,

Thank you for using Alamo.com to make your car rental reservation.

Your Confirmation Number is: 8506108

You will need this number to pick up your car, make any changes to, or cancel
your reservation.
Please print this e-mail message or record confirmation number to pick up
your rental.

Here's what you do to pickup your car:

oAlamo's airport rental
    counters, located near Baggage Claim, operate daily from 7:30 a.m. to
11:30
    p.m.

  oIf the counter is closed,
    exit the Baggage Claim area to the fourth island for convenient shuttle
service
    to our rental facility, a 10-minute drive from the airport. Shuttles
    begin operating at 5:00 a.m.

  oLocal renters go directly
    to our rental facility which is located at 24530 East 78 Avenue, a quick
10-minute
    drive from the airport.

  oAll cars are picked
    up and dropped off at the rental facility.

  oThe airport is located
    30 miles from downtown.

  oThe train station is
    about 20 minutes from the airport.

  oFor expedited Quicksilver
    service, look for the Quicksilver signs at our rental facility.

Save Time and Bypass the Counter...QuickRent:

To change your reservation to a QuickRent & bypass the rental counter, follow
this link:
http://res.alamo.com/default.asp?go=Frame&target=/Modify/modify_page0convert.a
sp?ConfirmNum=8506108%26LastName=Giron%26PUMonthYear=Mar-2001%26PUDay=10

To View, Modify or Cancel Your Reservation:

You may use the Web site to modify your reservation by following the link
provided below. If you experience any problems, email the webmaster at
webmaster@goalamo.com or call 1-877-252-6600

To view your Reservation, follow this link:
http://res.alamo.com/default.asp?go=Frame&target=/Modify/modify_page0.asp?Conf
irmNum=8506108%26LastName=Giron%26PUMonthYear=Mar-2001%26PUDay=10%26Mode=V

To modify your Reservation, follow this link:
http://res.alamo.com/default.asp?go=Frame&target=/Modify/modify_page0.asp?Conf
irmNum=8506108%26LastName=Giron%26PUMonthYear=Mar-2001%26PUDay=10%26Mode=M

To cancel your Reservation, follow this link:
http://res.alamo.com/default.asp?go=Frame&target=/Modify/modify_page0.asp?Conf
irmNum=8506108%26LastName=Giron%26PUMonthYear=Mar-2001%26PUDay=10%26Mode=C

Reservation Information:

Name:   Darron Giron
E-mail: dgiron@enron.com

Vehicle Type: Fullsize - Buick Century

Pickup Location:
Denver Intl, CO
24530 E 78th Ave
Denver, CO 80249
Phone: 303-342-7373
Fax:   303-342-3431
Hours: Mon-Sun: 6:00am-1:00am

Pickup Date: Saturday, March 10, 2001
Pickup Time: 9:30 PM

Drop-off Location: Denver Intl Airport, CO
Drop-off Date:     Saturday, March 17, 2001
Drop-off Time:     7:00 AM

Base Rate - Fullsize -  (USD)
(1) Weekly Rate ($167.99/wk)
Rate Code LQ
Guaranteed Base Rate
Unlimited Mileage

Subtotal....................$167.99

Taxes, Surcharges and Fees:
Concession Recoupment Fee (10%) - $16.80
Sales Tax (12.95%) - $25.38
Facility User Fee ($1.60/day) - $11.20

Subtotal....................$53.38

Grand Total....................$221.37

Total may vary slightly at time of rental based on the election of optional
coverage items or changes in taxes, surcharges and fees:

Rules:
You will need to show a valid Driver's License at time of rental.
Each driver must have a valid credit card.

Travel Tools:
For aditional information regarding driving directions, safety tips and
children's road games to plan your trip, please visit our web site via the
links below:

For driving directions, click
http://www.alamo.com/default.asp?go=http://www.vicinity.com/alamo/startdd.hm?C
MD=FILL
For safety tips, click http://www.alamo.com/default.asp?go=/SafetyTips/
For children's road games, click http://www.alamo.com/default.asp?go=/Kids/

Thank you again for using Alamo.com to make your Reservation. Drive Happy!


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 12/15/2000
05:11 PM ---------------------------

KhairuddinBMJaafar@petronas.com.my on 12/12/2000 12:40:57 AM
To: vkamins@ect.enron.com
cc:
Subject: Learning from other organizations on risk management practices

Dear Sir,

Attached is a copy of the letter faxed to you last week from Corporate Risk
Management Unit, PETRONAS, Malaysia  for your kind perusal.  We are looking
forward to hearing from you soon.

Thank you for your time and cooperation.

Yours sincerely,

Khairuddin Jaafar

 DISCLAIMER  : This e-mail and any files transmitted with it ("Message")
 is  intended  only  for the use of the recipient(s) named above and may
 contain  confidential  information.   You  are hereby notified that the
 taking  of  any action in reliance upon, or any review, retransmission,
 dissemination, distribution, printing or copying of this Message or any
 part thereof by anyone other than the intended recipient(s) is strictly
 prohibited.  If  you  have  received  this Message in error, you should
 delete this Message immediately and advise the sender by return e-mail.
 Opinions, conclusions and other information in this Message that do not
 relate  to  the official business of PETRONAS or its Group of Companies
 shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by PETRONAS or any of
 the companies within the Group.

(Embedded image moved to file: pic30538.pcx)
 - pic30538.pcx


Yeah--EMC is the best investment I ever made--I only wish I had put in
100000k instead of 1k.  Check this email out--one of our guys got it from
someone at one of our competitors.  Enron is known as the "evil empire" in
the energy bidness.  DF
C---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 06/22/2000
01:43 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Dari Dornan                           06/22/2000 09:13 AM

To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kent Miller/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Dave
Neubauer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: FW: Latest Press Release

I got this from outside the company.  Thought you might be interested.

Subject:  Latest Press Release

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Today Enron and Hades announced a definitive energy services agreement
said to be worth an estimated $666 Trillion.  In the deal, Enron will
provide both gas and electric commodities to Hades' facilities throughout
and under North America.  John D. Rockefeller, former CEO of energy
monopolist
Standard Oil, is now head of Hades' energy management division.  Said
Rockefeller, "Obviously Hell has significant heating demands.  While eternal
flames are a great idea in concept, they require vast and reliable fuel
resources.  Enron was the only supplier willing to make a deal with my
boss, and, as a former monopolist, I just
like the way they do business."  A spokesperson for Enron said the two
cultures were able to work easily together during negotiations.  According
to the company, "The deal fits both companies exceptionally well.  With
Hades' ability to attract and retain new customers, we see this as a
fabulous
growth opportunity for millennia to come."  According to several energy
industry insiders, Hades' high heating demand with very little need for
summer air conditioning make it a very attractive energy portfolio addition.
Hades is a multinational corporation with millions of sites worldwide
and approximately 173 quintillion customers.  The entity boasts sustained
high growth rates over the last two thousand years.  Enron is one of the
world's leading energy and communications companies.  The company owns
approximately $37 billion in energy and communications assets.  Enron
ranks in the top quarter of Fortune's "Best 100 Companies to Work For
if You Can Keep A Job There and Don't Mind Working 80 Hours A Week," and
is among the most respected corporations in America, as ranked by customers
with respect-us-or-get-curtailed clauses in their energy supply contracts.

______________________________________
This message, together with any attachments, is intended only for the
use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain
information that is legally privileged, confidential and exempt from
disclosure.  If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this
message,or any attachment, is strictly prohibited.  If you have received
this message in error, please notify the original sender (or the WSPR
Help Desk) immediately by telephone (212-858-1000) or by return
E-mail and delete the message, along with any attachments, from
your computer.  Thank you.


Nobody is leaving - it's a new position.


I spoke with all the following personally about the Trailblazer capacity
Kevin at e prime
Greg at Dominion
Calvin at Select
Greg Hood at Oxy
Steve at BP

The only person I had to leave a voicemail for is Grier at El Paso.  His number is 713-420-5673.  You may have already touched base with him.  If not, you may want to call him on Monday, I will be out.

later


The best summary of what is going on here that I have read recently:

http://www.infoxpress.com/reviewtracker/reprints.asp?page_id=814


next sat might be better.  i don't think mitch is gonna be able to make it and everyone was out of town last weekend.  let's do it next sat if you are in town.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Landry, Chad
Sent:	Tuesday, May 22, 2001 9:16 AM
To:	Lenhart, Matthew; Hull, Bryan; Marcantel MM (Mitch); Bass, Eric; Blanchard, Timothy
Subject:	You boys making

a trip up here for M-day.  We could hit 4th street Saturday Night.  Let me know.

CKL


Greg,

Please see the attached draft of the Master Firm Purchase/Sale Agreement for
your review.
Upon your review, please give me a call to discuss any questions and or
comments you may have regarding this matter.

Regards,
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Here are the arguments / material that I am trying to round up by mid-day
Friday.  Please add anything else to this to prove our point.

Enron's Agenda - Making the System More Reliable / Ending the Crisis

1. Supply - really four key pieces to the puzzle (1) Streamline Generation
Interconnection, (2) Mandatory Electricity Reliability Organization, (3)
Public Power Transmission Facilities Fully Under FERC, (4) Complete Open
Access - End the Native Load Exception

 The key theme:  Open Access "expands" the available generation and reduces
the overall need to build.

2. Demand - Industrial & Commercial Demand Buydown

 The key theme:  Sometimes the cheapest watt is the watt that isn't used.

I want to add that I still think that the right message is reliability AND
cost savings.  In California, the electricity bill could go from $7
billion/year (1999) to $70 billion/year (2001).   No matter how big your
economy is, there is no way that a price shock of that magnitude won't kill
your future growth.

KEY PROOF

1. HEPG Presentation    Shapiro

2. Natural Gas Analysis   Carson

3. Balkanization Analysis   Walton/Comnes/Neustaedter

4. AEP Transmission Abuses  Novosel

5. FERC Staff Report Anecdotes  Novosel

6. TCA Analysis - Price Impact  Pickel/Tabors

7. TCA Analysis - Expanding Supply Pickel/Tabors

8. Western Power Market Abuses  Dasovich/Comnes

I will try and call everyone in the am to discuss.

Jim


Dear Vince

I am delighted that you have agreed to take part in the Energy and Power
Risk Management 4th annual congress ? POWER 2000 ? which will be taking
place on 9 & 10 May 2000 in Houston, TX at the Houstonian.

As you know Energy and Power Risk Management Magazine has an excellent
reputation in the energy community and we want to make this event as
successful as possible.  We are currently in the process of launching the
event and researching the publications and associations mentioned during the
research for the conference to make sure that we are getting the best
coverage.   Before we complete the marketing plan for the conference we want
to be sure that we are reaching all the people who may be interested.

We constantly strive to improve the marketing of our events and therefore we
ask our speakers for further ideas and contacts. Therefore please could you
let me know whether you could help with any of the following.

Are there any particular people that you need to send brochures to? - we can
carry out any mailing on your behalf if you supply us with contact names and
addresses, alternatively I can send you a quantity of brochures

Do you have any in-house publications or a newsletter that we should insert
the course brochure into - or a diary date page that we could be included
on?

Would you like to write to your clients to invite them to attend? We can
offer them a 10% discount and can send them a letter or if you prefer to
write on your own letterhead we will organise the copying and distribution
for you.

Have you any delegate lists from events you have spoken at or attended with
a similar target audience to whom we should be sending information about the
course?

Do you have an internet site on which the course could be mentioned?

Do you have any other ideas? Any suggestions would be welcome.

Our marketing manager, Caroline Hyndman will contact you in the near future
to discuss any ideas you may have. Alternatively please give me a call on
212 925 1864 Ext 151.

Thanks very much for your help in this matter.

Best regards,

Emma


you need to send a warning with that


?

CRISIS... AND OPPORTUNITY?
Power Markets 2001

March 14-16 | Aladdin Hotel | Las Vegas

Click here to view?
 CRISIS AND OPPORTUNITY: POWER MARKETS 2001
http://www.pmaconference.com/0103Agendah.pdf

[IMAGE]

March 8, 2001:
Crisis and Opportunity Update

Join the Power Marketing Association at its annual spring meeting to discuss
the issues: ?California: What's in store for the summer? ?Gas Price
Volatility-- Why? ?Power Market Risks-- Explained; The Texas Retail Market--
Will it Work?; ?New Powerplants-- How big is the opportunity? Credit Risk--
How to manage it; Real Prices-- is the retail market ready to live without
price caps? ; Weather risk-- is it a market yet?; Transmission constraints--
are they completely intractable?; Provider of Last Resort-- is this a dumping
ground? The web-- what's real, what isn't-- beyond the hype; Retail billing--
Getting it right before you're bankrupt; Powerline Telecom-- The next big
thing?; Rolling Blackouts-- ?Peak shaving?; Distributed Generation-- Has the
time come?; Coal- fuel of the future-- and present. ?and ?Where is your
career going? ??There are already hundreds of registrants. ?Join us!

Here are some stories from the past couple of days on the PMA website,
powermarketers.com. ??Energy is moving to center stage in national policy
again. ?Get the latest-- click on the stories below, and click on our
conference brochure. ?See you in Vegas!

Power Markets 2001: Crisis and Opportunity - March 14-16 2001 Aladdin Hotel
Las Vegas Agenda Goes Gold
The final agenda for Power Markets 2001 is now available on the Power
Marketing Association website. ??Already, hundreds have registered to attend
the conference, scheduled for March 14-16, 2001 at the Aladdin Hotel in Las
Vegas. ?Hotel rooms are filling up. ?Last chance for this year's conference.
??
Download brochure at http://www.pmaconference.com/0103Agendah.pdf

UtIlicorp United Seeks Power Supply Contracts
UtiliCorp United (NYSE:UCU) is seeking power supply contracts to secure up to
1,250 megawatts of annual capacity for up to 15 years to help meet the
long-term energy demands of its 425,000 customers in Missouri, Kansas and
Colorado.
http://199.97.97.163/IMDS%PMANAT0%read%/home/content/users/imds/feeds/comtex/2
001/03/06/bw/0000-3703-.industrytopstories.util

Natural Gas Prices Drop Average Spot Figure Still Nearly Double Year-Ago Level
Natural gas prices have dropped for a second consecutive month. But prices
remain nearly double what they were a year ago, with no return to last year's
figures expected anytime soon.
http://199.97.97.163/IMDS%PMANAT0%read%/home/content/users/imds/feeds/bellsupe
r/2001/03/06/HFCT/0000-2302-KEYWORD.Missing

Nu-Coned Merger Talks Collapse State Utility Plans Lawsuit, Says Partner
Backing Out
Merger talks between Northeast Utilities and Consolidated Edison Inc.
collapsed Monday evening. NU said it would sue ConEd, arguing that the New
York utility was backing out of the $7.5 billion deal.
http://199.97.97.163/IMDS%PMANAT0%read%/home/content/users/imds/feeds/bellsupe
r/2001/03/06/HFCT/0000-2300-KEYWORD.Missing

Enron's Chief Denies Role As Energy Villain / Critics Regard Kenneth Lay As
Deregulation Opportunist
Kenneth Lay is one of the energy "pirates" accused by California's governor
of fleecing consumers. As chairman of Enron Corp., the world's largest energy
trader, Lay is arguably the biggest, baddest buccaneer of them all. ?But
that's not how he wants to be seen. And he certainly doesn't like taking
knocks from Gov. Gray Davis for having contributed to California's energy
mess.
http://199.97.97.163/IMDS%PMANAT0%read%/home/content/users/imds/feeds/bellsupe
r/2001/03/04/SFC/0000-2688-KEYWORD.Missing
?
?
Click here to view?
 CRISIS AND OPPORTUNITY: POWER MARKETS 2001
http://www.pmaconference.com/0103Agendah.pdf

?

Qualify for the?
CERTIFIED POWERMARKETERS EXAM
Attend PMA's preconference seminar:

FUNDAMENTALS OF POWER MARKETING
 http://www.pmaconference.com/0103Agendah.pdf

Covered at the Fundamentals of Power Marketing Seminar
Introduction to the Power Industry
Getting Started as a Marketer
Lexicon of Power Marketing
Indexed Transactions
Swaps
Tolling Agreements
Option-type transactions
Finance-type transactions
Serving the Retail Power Marketer
Retail Power Marketing
Key Issues in Retail Access
Nuts and Bolts of Retail Marketing
Future of Power

This program is valuable not only for new industry participants, but for
professionals who need an overview and "back to basics" review to provide
context for their jobs.

FUNDAMENTALS OF POWER MARKETING
March 14, 2001

Click here to view?
 CRISIS AND OPPORTUNITY: POWER MARKETS 2001
http://www.pmaconference.com/0103Agendah.pdf


---------------------- Forwarded by Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT on 11/13/2000
10:28 AM ---------------------------

Ceci Twachtman@EES
11/10/2000 05:48 PM
To: Linda Ng/HOU/EES@EES, smbradshaw@msn.com, Patricia Slaughter/HOU/EES@EES,
Justin Townsley/HOU/EES@EES, Karl Klicker/HOU/EES@EES, Rita Hartfield/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Patricia Slaughter/HOU/EES@EES, David
Chang/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Doug Leach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ted
C Bland/HOU/ECT@ECT, Craig Childers/HOU/EES@EES, Terry Pierce/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Roy Hartstein/NA/Enron@Enron, Anthony
Mends/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Lynette Malone/HOU/EES@EES, Harold G Buchanan/HOU/EES@EES, Thomas E
White/HOU/EES@EES, Pat Keelan/HOU/EES@EES, Bessik Matchavariani/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications
cc:
Subject: Article

VERY INTERESTING...
---------------------- Forwarded by Ceci Twachtman/HOU/EES on 11/10/2000
05:23 PM ---------------------------

David Haug@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
11/10/2000 03:19 PM
To: mklepper@skadden.com, Ceci Twachtman@Enron Communications
cc:
Subject: Article

---------------------- Forwarded by David Haug/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
11/10/2000 03:16 PM ---------------------------

Steven Haug@ENRON
11/10/2000 11:07 AM
To: Larry Abbott/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Mike Ames/OTS/Enron@Enron, Mike
Bonnstetter/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Max Brown/OTS/Enron@Enron, rd_cates@yahoo.com,
John Gormley/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Jeff Hamlin/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Danny
Holguin/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Steve Tarter/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Al
Vandarwarka/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Jon Wernette/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Norma
Nusz-Chandler/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Virgil Pfennig/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Gary
Numedahl/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, vdicke@courier.esu11.k12.ne.us, David
Haug/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, haug@tconl.com, vghaug@nque.com,
geoff@tconl.com, karenhaug@hotmail.com, laura.haug@amerus.com,
CindyJ.@prodigy.net, elmo413@carrollsweb.com, Marlene McCoy/ET&S/Enron@ENRON,
daisyd43@hotmail.com, John W Rose/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, omaharoses@hotmail.com,
Norm Ruiz/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, aly_gal@hotmail.com, Neta Zitnik/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Article

DO YOU THINK HE WOULD??
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
 Al Gore and
Constitution
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
, 2000 WorldNetDaily.com

Ever since I saw Al Gore give that uncharacteristically statesman-like speech
defending the integrity of the Electoral College system under the
Constitution of the United States, I've been scratching my head trying to
figure it out.

Who was this guy? Was this the same Al Gore who has demonstrated -- time and
time again -- so little respect for the Constitution during the last eight
years? Why was he giving up on the idea of a challenge to the Electoral
College, when it seemed many in his camp were banking on that as their last
line of defense?

Well, I think I have figured it out. Actually, there are two possibilities.

The first thought that came to me was that this was Al Gore's
"Don't-watch-the-man-behind-the-curtain speech." While he was extolling the
virtues of the Constitution, his minions in Florida -- from Bill Daley to
Jesse Jackson -- were busy subverting it by any means necessary. It was Al
Gore's way of establishing public plausible deniability. He stood above the
fray, while his cohorts did the dirty work.

But, more recently, another thought has occurred to me -- a darker, more
sinister thought. I hope I am wrong. I pray that, this time, I am
overestimating the deviousness of Al Gore. But that, of course, is always a
difficult task.

Think, for a moment, why Al Gore would suddenly be reading and citing the
Constitution.

The answer is that, in this instance, it gives him all the power. What do I
mean?

Who is it, under the Constitution, that is specifically charged with
certifying the Electoral College votes of each state? You guessed it. The
president of the U.S. Senate, which also happens to be the vice president of
the United States. That's right. The day those Electoral College votes go to
the Senate to be counted and certified to choose the next president of these
United States, Al Gore will be holding all the cards.

"Oh, Farah," you say, "you don't think Al Gore would tamper with the results
in any way with the whole world watching, do you?"

Well, let's think about what has been happening in Florida for the last
several days. Al Gore's campaign managers have been whipping up hysteria
stating that the will of the people in that state is being subverted.

They are filing lawsuits. They are organizing marches. They are all but
accusing the Bush campaign of voter fraud.

Listen to what Bill Daley has to say: "More than 100 million Americans voted
on Tuesday and more voted for Al Gore than George Bush. Here in Florida it
also seems very likely that more voters went to the polls believing that they
were voting for Al Gore than for George Bush. If the will of the people is to
prevail Al Gore should be awarded a victory in Florida, and be our next
president of the United States."

They've decided that no matter what the actual vote count shows, Gore wins.

Now, all Gore has to do on that fateful day in the U.S. Senate is reject for
certification the Electoral College votes of Florida, and he wins the
majority and becomes president. Sorry, Bush fans. I don't think there's a
thing you can do about it other than protest, complain and stomp your feet.
Better start planning your legal strategy now. I'll bet Al Gore's transition
team is already hard at work. Barbra Streisand is probably making plans to
sing at the Inauguration. Alec Baldwin is unpacking his bags. This could be a
fait accompli. I guarantee you a counter to this bold move is not in the Bush
campaign's playbook.

The Gore campaign, still working overtime, has laid the groundwork for the
challenge. The Florida vote is tainted, they say. It's too close to call. Too
many irregularities. The vote can simply be dismissed by the constitutional
authority -- Vice President Al Gore.

Would you put it past him? I sure wouldn't.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

Joseph Farah is editor and chief executive officer of WorldNetDaily.com and
writes a daily column.


PNGC joins in the two Answers and the Motion to Strike filed by the Market
Access Coalition.

R. Erick Johnson PC
888 SW Fifth Ave, Suite 870
Portland, OR ?97204
Tel: 503.295.2944
Fax: 503.295.1163
E-mail: ?Erick_Johnson@PNGC.com

	"McElroy, Kerry" <KerryMcElroy@dwt.com>

	04/11/2001 07:11 PM
		? ? ? ?
		? ? ? ? To: ? ? ? ?"'jack.speer@alcoa.com'" <jack.speer@alcoa.com>,
"'crow@millernash.com'" <crow@millernash.com>, "'michaelearly@earthlink.net'"
<michaelearly@earthlink.net>, "'eauverde@hotmail.com'"
<eauverde@hotmail.com>, "'jeff.schlect@avistacorp.com'"
<jeff.schlect@avistacorp.com>, "'tdeboer@painehamblen.com'"
<tdeboer@painehamblen.com>, "'rbstrong@painehamblen.com'"
<rbstrong@painehamblen.com>, "'rpierce@avistaenergy.com'"
<rpierce@avistaenergy.com>, "'Lhamilton@avistaenergy.com'"
<Lhamilton@avistaenergy.com>, "'pete@ashland.or.us'" <pete@ashland.or.us>,
"'mike.macdougall@powerex.com'" <mike.macdougall@powerex.com>,
"'pfox@bracepatt.com'" <pfox@bracepatt.com>, "'pjburger@bpa.gov'"
<pjburger@bpa! .gov>, "'jdwright@bpa.gov'" <jdwright@bpa.gov>,
"'jpw@duncanallen.com'" <jpw@duncanallen.com>,
"'tstevenson@ci.burbank.ca.us'" <tstevenson@ci.burbank.ca.us>,
"'seligman@teleport.com'" <seligman@teleport.com>, "'rkindley@schwabe.com'"
<rkindley@schwabe.com>, "'kmoxness@cencoast.com'" <kmoxness@cencoast.com>,
"'ghuhta@cowlitzpud.org'" <ghuhta@cowlitzpud.org>, "'bessex@cowlitzpud.org'"
<bessex@cowlitzpud.org>, "'gregb@clatskanie.com'" <gregb@clatskanie.com>,
"'johk@critfc.org'" <johk@critfc.org>, "'cub@teleport.com'"
<cub@teleport.com>, "'cwagers@dcpud.org'" <cwagers@dcpud.org>,
"'dws@keywaycorp.com'" <dws@keywaycorp.com>, "'pmurphy@mbllp.com'"
<pmurphy@mbllp.com>, "'bferranti@mbllp.com'" <bferranti@mbllp.com>,
"'pete.forsyth@kaiseral! .com'" <pete.forsyth@kaiseral.com>,
"'alan@epud.org'" <alan@epud.org>, "'mhain@ect.enron.com'"
<mhain@ect.enron.com>, "'darcy@tonkon.com'" <darcy@tonkon.com>,
"'jhartso@enron.com'" <jhartso@enron.com>, "'john.yanov@eweb.eugene.or.us'"
<john.yanov@eweb.eugene.or.us>, "'tgrim@chbh.com'" <tgrim@chbh.com>,
"'townsend@chbh.com'" <townsend@chbh.com>,
"'Dbouchard@ci.forest-grove.or.us'" <Dbouchard@ci.forest-grove.or.us>,
"'aw_turner@pgn.com'" <aw_turner@pgn.com>, "'lyn_williams@pgn.com'"
<lyn_williams@pgn.com>, "'rfoiani@gcpud.org'" <rfoiani@gcpud.org>,
"'kknitte@gcpud.org'" <kknitte@gcpud.org>, "'jdeason@chbh.com'"
<jdeason@chbh.com>, "'rle@givenspursley.com'" <rle@givenspursley.com>,
"'pspi@dynegy.com'" <pspi@dynegy.com>, "'ias@! dvclaw.com'" <ias@dvclaw.com>,
"'lwolv@worldaccessnet.com'" <lwolv@worldaccessnet.com>,
"'pnichols@idahopower.com'" <pnichols@idahopower.com>,
"'pobenchain@idahopower.com'" <pobenchain@idahopower.com>,
"'elisaCKF@aol.com'" <elisaCKF@aol.com>, "'dparrish@prmllp.com'"
<dparrish@prmllp.com>, "'JLH@mc-power.com'" <JLH@mc-power.com>,
"'mthomas@mtpower.com'" <mthomas@mtpower.com>, "'mstauffer@mtpower.com'"
<mstauffer@mtpower.com>, "'lawyer@teleport.com'" <lawyer@teleport.com>,
"'steve@nwenergy.org'" <steve@nwenergy.org>, "'bpadiscovery@merkellaw.com'"
<bpadiscovery@merkellaw.com>, "'jsaven@pacifier.com'" <jsaven@pacifier.com>,
"'janet.prewitt@state.or.us'" <janet.prewitt@state.or.us>,
"'marc.hellman@state.or.us'" <marc.hellman@state.or.us>, "'er!
ic.larson@oremetwahchang.com'" <eric.larson@oremetwahchang.com>,
"'efinklea@energyadvocates.com'" <efinklea@energyadvocates.com>,
"'tgrim@chbh.com'" <tgrim@chbh.com>, "'townsend@chbh.com'"
<townsend@chbh.com>, "'lpeters@pacifier.com'" <lpeters@pacifier.com>,
"'pljacklin@stoel.com'" <pljacklin@stoel.com>, "'schall@stoel.com'"
<schall@stoel.com>, "'scott.brattebo@pacificorp.com'"
<scott.brattebo@pacificorp.com>, "'dbkinnard@pplmt.com'"
<dbkinnard@pplmt.com>, "'dmacgregor@morganlewis.com'"
<dmacgregor@morganlewis.com>, "'erick_johnson@pngc.com'"
<erick_johnson@pngc.com>, "'doug_brawley@pngc.com'" <doug_brawley@pngc.com>,
"'darkills@popud.com'" <darkills@popud.com>, "'kyle@ppcpdx.org'"
<kyle@ppcpdx.org>, "'peter@richardsonandoleary.com'" <peter@richar!
dsonandoleary.com>, "'marss@perkinscoie.com'" <marss@perkincoie.com>,
"'dfaulk@puget.com'" <dfaulk@puget.com>, "'stephens@eslerstephens.com'"
<stephens@eslerstephens.com>, "'rachel@rnp.org'" <rachel@rnp.org>,
"'jacksonc@ida.net'" <jacksonc@ida.net>, "'kevin.clark@ci.seattle.wa.us'"
<kevin.clark@ci.seattle.wa.us>, "'ali.rodol@ci.seattle.wa.us'"
<ali.rodol@ci.seattle.wa.us>, "'EnerGlaw@aol.com'" <EnerGlaw@aol.com>,
"'BASSL@sce.com'" <BASSL@sce.com>, "'jeffn@subutil.com'" <jeffn@subutil.com>,
"'mershanlaw@aol.com'" <mershanlaw@aol.com>, "'pvickery@tpud.org'"
<pvickery@tpud.org>, "'skaravit@ci.tacoma.wa.us'" <skaravit@ci.tacoma.wa.us>,
"'mmetzler@ci.tacoma.wa.us'" <mmetzler@ci.tacoma.wa.us>,
"'jrb_ora@televar.com'" <jrb_ora@televar.com>, &! quot;'dan.meek@usa.net'"
<dan.meek@usa.net>, "'kevinbell@cvresearch.com'" <kevinbell@cvresearch.com>,
"'creali@vanalco.com'" <creali@vanalco.com>, "'terrym@millcreeklaw.com'"
<terrym@millcreeklaw.com>, "'huse@eesconsulting.com'"
<huse@eesconsulting.com>, "'simonf@atg.wa.gov'" <simonf@atg.wa.gov>,
"'matts1@atg.wa.gov'" <matts1@atg.wa.gov>, "'wmgt3@montana.com'"
<wmgt3@montana.com>, "'ccopatrny@e-z.net'" <ccopatrny@e-z.net>,
"'abuckley@wutc.wa.gov'" <abuckley@wutc.wa.gov>, "'sjohnsto@wutc.wa.gov'"
<sjohnsto@wutc.wa.gov>, "'weavertr@yakima-wa.com'" <weavertr@yakima-wa.com>,
"'doney@doneylaw.com'" <doney@doneylaw.com>
		? ? ? ? cc: ? ? ? ?
		? ? ? ? Subject: ? ? ? ?Electronic Filings

?<<Answer to Motion for Recusal.final.doc>> ? ? ? ? <<Answer to Motion to
Extend Evidentiary Hearing.final.doc>>
<<Motion to Strike.final.doc>>

 - Answer to Motion for Recusal.final.doc
 - Answer to Motion to Extend Evidentiary Hearing.final.doc
 - Motion to Strike.final.doc


This is an easy one.  1400 Smith, EB3803B.

Thanks!

Marie

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Hudson, Roeline" <HudsonR@teai.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Hudson+2C+20Roeline+22+20+3CHudsonR+40teai+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Wednesday, October 03, 2001 4:28 PM
To:	Heard, Marie
Subject:	RE: Fee Letter

Hi -

You didn't think you would away today without another e-mail from me, did
you???? (just joking)

When I courier these documents over to you tomorrow I will send them to 1400
Smith Street, but don't I have to put in a building number or room number
for you in order that it will get to you for sure?  Let me know what that is
-

Thanks,
Until tomorrow,
Roeline

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Marie.Heard@enron.com [SMTP:Marie.Heard@enron.com]
> Sent:	Wednesday, October 03, 2001 3:28 PM
> To:	HudsonR@teai.com
> Subject:	RE: Fee Letter
>
> Hi, Roeline:
>
> We would prefer to sign the fee letter at the same time we sign the
> assignments.  Yes, we will sign enough originals of all documents so that
> all parties can have an original.
>
> Hopefully we can get this wrapped up tomorrow, as I will be out of the
> office Friday.
>
> Marie
>
>     -----Original Message-----
>    From:   "Hudson, Roeline" <HudsonR@teai.com>@ENRON
>
> [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Hudson+2C+20Roeline+22+20+3CHudsonR+40teai+2Ecom+3E+
> 40ENRON@ENRON.com]
>
>
>    Sent:   Wednesday, October 03, 2001 3:26 PM
>    To:     Heard, Marie
>    Subject:  RE: Fee Letter
>
>    Marie -
>
>    One more question - I received some of these in duplicate, and some of
>    them
>    were original only.  Like the Termination Agreement that you just
>    couriered
>    over to me - I only got one original from you, and there are two
>    signatures.
>    We would like to have an original signature as well - so are we going
> to
>    do
>    this after the fact?  That would be okay by me, because I want to have
>    them
>    all signed and off my desk - so just let me know how you think we
> should
>    do
>    this.
>
>    Thanks, Marie -
>    Roeline
>
>
>    > -----Original Message-----
>    > From:      Marie.Heard@enron.com [SMTP:Marie.Heard@enron.com]
>    > Sent:      Wednesday, October 03, 2001 1:32 PM
>    > To:   HudsonR@teai.com
>    > Cc:   Russell.Diamond@enron.com
>    > Subject:   RE: Fee Letter
>    >
>    > Hi, Roeline!
>    >
>    > I'm sending the original revised Termination Agreement over to you
>    this
>    > afternoon.  Let me know if you have any questions or need anything
>    else.
>    >
>    > Marie
>    >
>    >     -----Original Message-----
>    >    From:   "Hudson, Roeline" <HudsonR@teai.com>@ENRON
>    >
>    >
>
> [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Hudson+2C+20Roeline+22+20+3CHudsonR+40teai+2Ecom+3E+
>    > 40ENRON@ENRON.com]
>    >
>    >
>    >    Sent:   Wednesday, October 03, 2001 9:52 AM
>    >    To:     Heard, Marie
>    >    Subject:  RE: Fee Letter
>    >
>    >    Hi Marie,
>    >
>    >    The fee letter looks good - and I have all of the paperwork here,
>    > except
>    >    of
>    >    course the Termination letter for ENA Deal #0619, which you
>    indicated
>    >    the
>    >    Confirmation Desk was workin on.  So things look good to go.
>    >
>    >    I have the paperwork back from both Dynegy and Sempra, but United
>    Oil's
>    >    letters is being reviewed by its lawyer today.  He was away for
> the
>    > past
>    >    two
>    >    days.  As soon as I have everything together I will courier the
>    > complete
>    >    package to you - one detail that I forgot to mention - right now I
>    have
>    >    fax
>    >    copies only, and I hope it will suffice until I can get original
>    >    signatures.
>    >    If it does not, then we are in real trouble!!  So say it is okay -
>    and
>    > I
>    >    will work on the originals after the deal is completed.
>    >
>    >    Thanks for all your help, Marie.
>    >
>    >    Roeline
>    >
>    >
>    >
>    >    > -----Original Message-----
>    >    > From:      Heard, Marie [SMTP:Marie.Heard@ENRON.com]
>    >    > Sent:      Wednesday, October 03, 2001 8:51 AM
>    >    > To:   hudsonr@teai.com
>    >    > Cc:   Diamond, Russell
>    >    > Subject:   Fee Letter
>    >    >
>    >    > Hi, Roeline!
>    >    >
>    >    > Attached for your review is a draft of the proposed fee letter
> in
>    >    > connection with the assignments and terminations.  Please let me
>    know
>    >    if
>    >    > you have any comments.
>    >    >
>    >    > Our Confirmation Desk is in the process of revising the
>    termination
>    > of
>    >    > ENA Deal No. NL0619.1 to delete the fee reference, and I will
>    forward
>    >    it
>    >    > to you when ready.
>    >    >
>    >    > Please let me know when you have signoff on the other documents
>    and I
>    >    > will finalize and have executed by ENA and forward to you.
>    >    >
>    >    > Thanks!
>    >    >
>    >    > Marie
>    >    >
>    >    >
>    >    >             <<060ltr (torch).doc>>
>    >    >
>    >    >
>    >    >
>    >
> **********************************************************************
>    >    > This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant
>    >    affiliate
>    >    > and may contain confidential and privileged material for the
> sole
>    use
>    >    of
>    >    > the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or
>    >    disclosure by
>    >    > others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
>    recipient
>    >    (or
>    >    > authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the
>    sender
>    > or
>    >    > reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com
>    and
>    >    > delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any
>    attachments
>    >    hereto)
>    >    > are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not
>    create
>    >    or
>    >    > evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp.
>    (or
>    >    any of
>    >    > its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party,
>    and
>    > may
>    >    not
>    >    > be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or
>    >    > otherwise. Thank you.
>    >    >
>    >
> **********************************************************************
>    >    <<
>    >    > File: 060ltr (torch).doc >>


Janie,

 I have been talking with EES and they have confirmed their volumes for their
purchases from ENA (I believe that it is Zarin who comfirmed their volumes on
their side).  I need you to confirm and verify our volumes and to change them
(or contact who can change them) if needed.  I am trying to get EES to pay us
for these transactions and they will not if they do not agree.  The amount
that we are talking about is over $10 mil.  Could you please look at this so
that I can get this resolved today?  The following shows what we are out:

Please let me know what you find out.  Thanks...


Please add Financial and Control group to these book requests if they are missing.  We would like for everyone to have access to these books that is on that matrix we sent you.  Thanks.
PL

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Keiser, Kam
Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 1:01 PM
To:	Trevino, Susan
Cc:	Love, Phillip M.; Winfree, O'Neal D.; Giron, Darron C.; McLaughlin Jr., Errol; Palmer, B. Scott
Subject:	new book req

Susan,

These are book requests for the Netco books for all regions.

Please let me know if you have any questions.  We put in some book and portfolio codes we would like if they are available.  If not, please call me.  We need all price, basis, index, and gas daily US books to be the same, all Canadian books to be the same and all physical books to have the same codes please.

Thanks

Kam

 << File: Book Request Form  Financial.xls >>  << File: Book Request Form Central.xls >>  << File: Book Request Form East.xls >>  << File: Book Request Form Texas.xls >>  << File: Book Request Form West.xls >>


TXU LSP will be performing line replacement on Line X the second week of
May, potentially May 7th and 8th requiring a reduction in receipt volumes
into the pipe between West Texas and Ft. Worth.

TXU LSP will be performing smart pig maintenance activities on Line V the
3rd week of May, potentially May 21st and 24th, requiring shut in of
receipts between Groesbeck & Iola.  Also, on May 24, the Midcon point will
be down.

TXU LSP will be performing line replacement on Line V4, affecting only the
Dow interconnect and the Crosstex interconnect in Ft. Bend Co.

Due to system constraints all Shippers must stay within contract swing
limits.

Imbalance makeup may be scheduled with prior approval from your
Transportation Administrator.

In our ongoing effort to keep TXU Lone Star Pipeline customers aware of
current Daily Available Capacity on our system, TXU Lone Star Pipeline is
pleased to provide you an estimate of available capacity on the TXU Lone
Star Pipeline system.  This is a Microsoft Excel document.  Simply click on
the attachment to view or download to your hard drive.  If you wish to be
removed from this notification, or if you wish to add another person from
your organization, please provide your name, company name, e-mail address
and/or fax number to David Flowers at 214-875-2092 (or via e-mail at
davidflowers@txu.com). TXU Lone Star Pipeline shall not be liable for any
Customers' failure to receive such e-mails. The information transmitted is
intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may
contain confidential and/or privileged material.  Any review,
retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in
reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the
intended recipient is prohibited.  If you received this in error, please
contact the sender and delete the material from your computer.

(See attached file: TXULSP Avail Cap Elec Gen.xls)


Jeff,
FYI (I thought she was going to cc you).
---------------------- Forwarded by Joseph Alamo/SFO/EES on 03/31/2000 02:50
PM ---------------------------

Tracy McLaughlin@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
03/31/2000 01:58 PM
To: Jennifer Rawlings/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
cc: Joseph Alamo/SFO/EES@EES, Donna Clayson/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications
Subject: AFTS Projected Numbers for 2000 re:  income statement for CA PUC
Filings

Hi Jennifer:

This is regarding the conference call we had last week with Jeff
Dasovich/Donna Clayson/Todd Henne and Scott Bolton.  I wanted to know if we
can get those AFTS projected numbers for the CA income statement.  Donna
Clayson needs them to put down on the income statement she is working on.
Can you give me an idea of when they will be ready (or just let Donna know)

Thanks!

Tracy J. McLaughlin
Enron Broadband Services
Government Affairs Coordinator
(503) 886-0396


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/09/2001
03:24 PM ---------------------------

Barbara Ostdiek <ostdiek@rice.edu> on 03/08/2001 05:04:29 PM
To: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Karolyi Visit

Vince:

We are having some scheduling conflicts for Andrew visit this coming
Monday.  As the schedule currently, his seminar will be at 1:00 pm in the
Dean's Conference Room.  I realize that this is not the best time for you
and I apologize for any inconvenience.  We may also need to use the same
time slot for Philippe's visit on the 19th.

We plan to meet somewhere in the Village for an informal reception at 5:30
Monday afternoon.  I will let you know the specifics on that once I have
figured them out!  From there you, George, Dave, and Jeff are scheduled to
go to dinner with Andrew around 7:00 pm.  You may join in for cocktails or
meet up with the other group for dinner - your choice.  Dave or Jeff will
let you know the dinner plan.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

I have attached PDF files with the papers for both Andrew and Philippe's
seminars.

You can get to Andrew's vitae through this link
http://fisher.osu.edu/fin/faculty/karolyi/resume.htm and Philippe's vitae
through this link http://www.gsm.uci.edu/~jorion/resume.pdf .

Thank you.

bbo

 - Draft0900.PDF
 - info.pdf
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Barbara Ostdiek
Assistant Professor of Finance
Jones Graduate School of Management
Rice University
6100 Main Street - MS 531
Houston, TX 77005-1892

713-348-5384 (voice)
713-348-5251 (fax)
ostdiek@rice.edu
www.ruf.rice.edu/~ostdiek/


You are right, Vince....Celeste and I did discuss it, and she approved his
Feb. start date.
Datren does know about that, so it sounds like it is cleared up.

Thanks so much, and we are sorry for the confusion!
Carol

Vince J Kaminski
10/12/2000 03:58 PM
To: Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Carol Coats/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Datren Williams Acceptance

Stinson,

I think it's a mistake. It  should be February.

Vince

Stinson Gibner
10/10/2000 08:11 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Datren Williams Acceptance

FYI

---------------------- Forwarded by Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT on 10/10/2000
08:10 PM ---------------------------

	Carol Coats
	09/29/2000 02:36 PM

To: Celeste Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Datren Williams Acceptance

Celeste,

I just received Datren Williams' acceptance with the following note attached:

"My graduation date (Ph.D. Candidate from LSU) is Dec. 2000.  Celeste Roberts
has informed me that I would have the option of starting work Feb. 2001.  I am
under the impression that I will start in Feb. 2001.  My offer letter has a
start date
of Aug. 2001.  If this is a problem, please give me a call.
Looking forward to working at Enron.

Thanks a million,
Datren W."

Please let me know if he may in fact start in Feb. 2001, and if so, do you
have
a specific date for him, or may he choose?

Thanks, Celeste,
Carol


Looks like the changes are relatively minor, but I feel better!
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/21/2000 03:40
PM ---------------------------

"William J. Harmon" <wjharmon@JonesDay.com> on 11/21/2000 02:51:55 PM
To: "Boyd J. Springer" <bjspringer@JonesDay.com>
cc: gregg.penman@enron.com, Kay.Mann@enron.com

Subject: Re: Peoples Transaction

Attached is the "term sheet" with some suggested revisions (identified by
strikethrough and underlining).  We suggest that you simply call the "late
charges" interest rather than any other term.  This type of business
transaction is exempt from the usury statute in terms of any maximum rate
and thus it is best to make it clear that the late charge is "interest"
rather than something else.  The other changes I made were merely to
clarify the method of calculating the interest on overdue amounts.  I note
the the contract you provided does include a provision for interest on
overdue invoice amounts.  Under the contract, interest is the Citibank
prime rate.  I assume you will set this term sheet up as an amendment to
the agreement.
(See attached file: Payment Delay Term Sheet.doc)

Please contact us if there are any other questions.

Bill Harmon
wjharmon@jonesday.com
312-269-4160
Fax: 312-782-8585

                    Boyd J. Springer
                    Extension 54151      To:     Kay.Mann@enron.com
                                         cc:     gregg.penman@enron.com,
                    11/21/00 11:52         William J. Harmon/JonesDay@JonesDay
                    AM                   Subject:     Re: Peoples Transaction
                                           (Document link: William J. Harmon)

Kay: Bill Harmon from our office (312-269-4160) is reviewing the material
re deferred payment and will get back to you.

==========
The preceding e-mail message (including any attachments) contains
information that may be confidential, be protected by the attorney-client
or other applicable privileges, or constitute non-public information.  It
is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s).  If you are
not an intended recipient of this message, please notify the sender by
replying to this message and then delete it from your system.  Use,
dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this message by unintended
recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.
==========

==========
The preceding e-mail message (including any attachments) contains
information that may be confidential, be protected by the attorney-client
or other applicable privileges, or constitute non-public information.  It
is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s).  If you are
not an intended recipient of this message, please notify the sender by
replying to this message and then delete it from your system.  Use,
dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this message by unintended
recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.
==========

 - Payment Delay Term Sheet.doc


I hope this helps.  Let me know if you think we should shorten the trip.  I am making each group available to your desk for fundamental presentations of the western gas market.  I will have them present their area of responsibility.  Let me know if you have specific fundamental requests.

Grigsby

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Grigsby, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, August 16, 2001 2:58 PM
To:	Belden, Tim; Badeer, Robert; Motley, Matt
Subject:	FW: West Power Rotation

Group 1: 09/17 - 09/21

Keith Holst
Matt Smith - Fundamentals
Jason Huang - Fundamentals

Group 2:  10/15 - 10/19

Frank Ermis
Steve South
Janie Tholt

Group 3: 11/12 - 11/16

Mike Grigsby
Matt Lenhart
Jason Wolfe

Group 4:  12/10 - 12/14

Jay Reitmeyer
Monique Sanchez
Susan Scott


Here are our credit ratings vs. our competitors

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Harrison, Tyrell
Sent:	Wednesday, November 14, 2001 10:00 AM
To:	Tycholiz, Barry; Whitt, Mark; Lucci, Paul T.; Staab, Theresa; Felling, Amy; Fuller, Dave; Miller, Stephanie; Ward, Kim S (Houston); Polsky, Phil; Bronstein, Mara
Subject:	Credit Rating of our competitors

Attached is a matrix of credit ratings for Enron and our competitors

Tyrell


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 02/15/2001 11:31 AM -----

	"Ronald Carroll" <rcarroll@bracepatt.com>
	02/15/2001 11:12 AM

		 To: "Mark Evans" <mevans@bracepatt.com>, <gfergus@brobeck.com>,
<rreilley@coral-energy.com>, <acomnes@enron.com>, <dfulton@enron.com>,
<jdasovic@enron.com>, <jhartso@enron.com>, <jsteffe@enron.com>,
<mary.hain@enron.com>, <smara@enron.com>, <snovose@enron.com>,
<hao@quinnemanuel.com>, <gackerman@wptf.org>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Fwd: LA Times - Creditors Chafe at State's Pace on Power Crisis

----- Message from "Tracey Bradley" <tbradley@bracepatt.com> on Thu, 15 Feb
2001 09:12:01 -0600 -----
To:	"Paul Fox" <pfox@bracepatt.com>
cc:	"Andrea Settanni" <asettanni@bracepatt.com>, "Charles Ingebretson"
<cingebretson@bracepatt.com>, "Charles Shoneman" <cshoneman@bracepatt.com>,
"Deanna King" <dking@bracepatt.com>, "David Parr" <dparr@bracepatt.com>,
"Jeffrey Watkiss" <dwatkiss@bracepatt.com>, "Gene Godley"
<ggodley@bracepatt.com>, "Justin Long" <jlong@bracepatt.com>, "Kimberly
Curry" <kcurry@bracepatt.com>, "Michael Pate" <mpate@bracepatt.com>, "Ronald
Carroll" <rcarroll@bracepatt.com>
Subject:	LA Times - Creditors Chafe at State's Pace on Power Crisis
Creditors Chafe at State's Pace on Power Crisis

By NANCY RIVERA BROOKS, DAN MORAIN, Times Staff Writers

     The California energy crisis is hurtling along two tracks--one the slow
lane of legislative politics, the other the hyper-speed autobahn of high
finance.

     As Stage 3 electricity alerts and billion-dollar debts mount, some
travelers on those intersecting byways are strapping themselves in for what
they see as a looming pileup, perhaps at the doors of the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court.

     Wall Street is becoming increasingly irritated with the deliberative
pace of the California Legislature and Gov. Gray Davis and his months of
unfulfilled vows of a remedy.

     Those owed money by Southern California Edison and Pacific Gas &
Electric said Wednesday that they cannot not wait forever to be paid.

     "The pace of progress is not sufficient," said Joe Bob Perkins,
president of Reliant Energy, a major power supplier in the state. "Our
accounts receivable from the past aren't being taken care of and the bleeding
is growing."

     In Sacramento, no immediate first aid is on the way.
     Davis, who says he will announce his latest plan to solve the utilities'
financial meltdown on Friday, left little doubt on Wednesday that he intends
to press for a state takeover of the massive electricity transmission system,
despite its huge value to the utilities. But key legislators predict that, no
matter what the governor proposes, they are at least two weeks away from
passing legislation to improve the situation.

     Bob Foster, the Edison official who oversees governmental affairs, said
the question of bankruptcy is "a day-to-day thing. There are signs that
creditors are getting increasingly nervous, increasingly impatient."

     "We were told last week that there will be a proposal from the
administration, and we're still waiting," Foster said.

     Senate President Pro Tem John Burton (D-San Francisco) said that if
Davis and lawmakers cannot resolve the matter within the next two weeks, "we
aren't going to be able to solve it, and it will be in other people's hands."

     Edison and PG&E have said they do not want to file for bankruptcy
protection and will do so only if forced by their creditors. A prelude to
bankruptcy, the formation of creditors committees, already has begun. Each
utility can be forced into bankruptcy by as few as three creditors owed as
little as $10,775 in unsecured debts, bankruptcy experts say.

     "We respectfully believe that the state has less time than they might
otherwise think," Gary Dunton, president and chief executive officer of MBIA
Inc., a firm that insures $1.3 billion of the utilities' debt.

     "If someone called me an hour from now [to announce a bankruptcy
filing]," Dunton added, "I wouldn't be surprised. We have been very clear
that we are frustrated with the timing, and apparent lack of urgency.

     "If you have 100 people cooking a stew, it may never be edible."
     Not everyone, however, believes that the prolonged legislative process
will make much difference in the long run, despite the howls from creditors'
and utilities.

     "I don't sense that there is a sense of urgency," said Assemblyman
George Runner Jr. (R-Lancaster). Runner, like other legislators, pointed to
repeated deadlines that have come and gone without a bankruptcy, and said:
"Crying wolf can go so far."

     Some legislators blame Davis for the delays.

     "The Legislature will pass enabling legislation. But people are waiting
to hear from [the governor's] corner office," said Assembly Republican leader
Bill Campbell of Villa Park, who has not conferred with Davis for a week. "We
think it is serious. But it is a frustrating situation."

     Some lawmakers in Sacramento believe that not all the legislative gears
are in sync, thus complicating progress. They say Davis has positioned
himself politically so that the Legislature will carry the brunt of the blame
when potential rate increases come into effect.

     "The governor is out there saying no more rate increases and that he's
on the side of consumers, while we have to do the dirty work," fumed an
Assembly Democrat, who requested anonymity out of fear that his comments
would only inflame an already tense relationship between the executive and
the Legislature.

     That irritation grew among Assembly Democrats when a poll they recently
commissioned showed the Legislature's approval rating had dropped 25 points,
while Davis' rating remained relatively high. The poll, conducted in late
January by the Sacramento firm Moore Methods, showed Davis with a 45%
approval rating, compared with only 25% for the Legislature.

     Meanwhile, the cost to the state treasury of buying power is rocketing
toward $2 billion, as the Department of Water Resources buys electricity
because utilities are no longer able to borrow money.

     "Giving [away] $2 billion that could have gone to build schools,
housing, highways and help lower taxes for consumers . . . is a moral
outrage," said Harvey Rosenfield of the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer
Rights.

     In the meantime, the electricity bills--and defaults by the two
utilities--continue to swell with no end in sight.

     California's power plant owners, already frustrated by the hundreds of
millions of dollars they haven't been paid by the state's two biggest
utilities, fear that the debt is growing by millions of dollars a day--even
after the state ponied up taxpayers money to buy electricity for the
utilities. That's because power purchasers for the state are refusing to pay
for all of the electricity that grid operators order on a last-minute basis
to prevent blackouts.

     Growing anxious over the slow pace of progress in Sacramento, generators
are looking for help from the courts and from state and federal regulators.
They won a victory Wednesday when federal regulators ruled that power
suppliers cannot be forced to bear the risk that they won't get paid when
grid operators order them to supply emergency power.

     Davis said Wednesday that the ongoing snags in buying power are being
worked out. The lingering problem of the utilities' estimated $12.7 billion
in electricity debts, Davis said, can be fixed by the state's purchase of the
transmission grid. The money paid to the utilities for the grid--which would
have to be negotiated--plus lease payments the state would make to the
utilities to continue operating the 32,000 miles of high-voltage wires, would
infuse the companies with enough cash to restructure their debt.

     "We're talking about a financial transaction that has value to both
sides," Davis said. "It has become increasingly clear to me that we cannot
accomplish that without purchasing the transmission lines."

     Although Davis voiced his support of taking over the utilities'
moneymaking transmission system, he has not conferred with companies'
executives for a week. In fact, they learned of it from press accounts.

     "It's all just a giant game of chicken," a top utility executive said,
asking that he not be identified. "But I'm worried that the administration is
going to overplay its hand and leave us with no options."

* * *
     Times staff writers James F. Peltz, Nicholas Riccardi, Stuart
Silverstein, Rone Tempest, Nancy Vogel and Jenifer Warren contributed to this
story.