CES has decided to take 600 dth/day of their Texas Gas Zone 4 length into
CGAS at Lebanon for the 24th-29th.  To keep the deal tickets simple, I am
showing a purchase from CES at Lebanon for 600 dth/day at the first of the
month CGAS price.

Joe, I created a purchase from CES (deal 202576).  Match this up with 600dth
of deal 159319.

We will effectively be using 600 dth less of Dayton space for CES starting on
the 24th.

I will let you know if things change.

bperron@columbiaenergygroup.com on 02/22/2000 10:34:30 AM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, "        -         *Boyd, Heidi"
<hboyd@columbiaenergygroup.com>, "        -         *Bizik, Kim"
<knovsek@columbiaenergygroup.com>
cc: "        -         *Dalphon, Charles" <cdalpho@columbiaenergygroup.com>
Subject: CGE transfer to TCO Pool

Chris,

 We are going to redirect 3600 dths off of Texas Gas from CG&E to TCO
Pool.  600 dths/day will be delivered at Lebanon starting Thursday, February
24.
Please let me know if there are any questions or problems.

Brian


Start Date: 4/25/01; HourAhead hour: 5;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042505.txt

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 5 / Preferred:   1.96 / Final:   1.93)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE4
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/25/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


Please take the form of the Cayuga confid agreement, and substitute this name.

This is CA day!

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 12/22/2000 12:48
PM ---------------------------

Fred Mitro@ECT
12/22/2000 12:03 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: NRG-CA

Kay:

I talked with NRG (San Diego) regarding the CA for the 7EA purchase.

The NRG entity that will be executing the CA is:

 NRG Development Co., Inc.
 750 B Street
 San Diego, CA  92101
 Attention:  Mr. Scott Magie

If asked, I will relay to Scott that the form of the Agreement was based on
Enron's form utilized in all turbine transaction CA's.

hohohow's the egg flowing today on 38?

Fred


Sally,
 I just read the email announcing your promotion.  Congratulations on a job
well done!
Kim Stanley Bergen


Louise,

I've seen a list where you nominate a set of business sponsors to represent NA interests, and it appears that the intention is to have single points of contact for each of the budget buckets.

However, there are a number of horizontal initiatives, such as Global Data, that cut across all of them.

Is it your intention that we take the horizontals to all the people listed, or will you nominate one to evaluate the budget numbers?

regards

Steve


Note that Instructions #6 and 15 of the NGPL data requests require compliance
with Rule 403(c).

PART 385--RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE--Table of Contents

   Subpart D--Discovery Procedures for Matters Set for Hearing Under
                                Subpart E

Sec. 385.403  Methods of discovery; general provisions (Rule 403).

    (a) Discovery methods. Participants may obtain discovery by data
requests, written interrogatories, and requests for production of
documents or things (Rule 406), depositions by oral examination (Rule
404), requests for inspection of documents and other property (Rule
407), and requests for admission (Rule 408).
    (b) Discovery conferences. (1) The presiding officer may direct the
participants in a proceeding or their representatives to appear for one
or more conferences, either separately or as part of any other
prehearing conference in the proceeding under Rule 601(a), for the
purpose of scheduling discovery, identifying discovery issues, and
resolving discovery disputes. Except as provided in paragraph (b)(2) of
this section, the presiding officer, upon the conclusion of a
conference, will issue an order stating any and all decisions made and
agreements reached during the conference.
    (2) The Chief Administrative Law Judge may, upon a showing of
extraordinary circumstances, waive the requirement to issue an order
under paragraph (b)(1) of this section.
    (c) Identification and certification of preparer. Each response to
discovery under this subpart must:
    (1) Identify the preparer or person under whose direct supervision
the response was prepared; and
    (2) Be under oath or, for representatives of a public or private
corporation or a partnership or association or a governmental agency, be
accompanied by a signed certification of the preparer or person
supervising the preparation of the response on behalf of the entity that
the response is true and accurate to the best of that person's
knowledge, information, and belief formed after a reasonable inquiry.
    (d) Supplementation of responses. (1) Except as otherwise provided
by this paragraph, a participant that has responded to a request for
discovery with a response that was complete when made is not under a
continuing duty to supplement that response to include information later
acquired.
    (2) A participant must make timely amendment to any prior response
if the

[[Page 881]]

participant obtains information upon the basis of which the participant
knows that the response was incorrect when made, or though correct when
made is now incorrect in any material respect.
    (3) A participant may be required to supplement a response by order
of the presiding officer or by agreement of all participants.
    (4) A participant may request supplementation of prior responses, if
such request is permitted under the procedural schedule.

[Order 225, 47 FR 19022, May 3, 1982, as amended by Order 466-A, 52 FR
35909, Sept. 24, 1987]


You didn't know that? It's actually Mary Katherine Symes. My parents decided
that Katherine Mary didn't sound "Catholic" enough; but they still wanted a
daughter named Katie, so they went right ahead and called me that from the
day I was born. Needless to say, it's added an unnecessary element of
confusion to my life in that people are always wondering who the hell this
"Mary Symes" person is.

Thanks for noticing, though!

Mary Katherine


fyi.  Michelle

---------------------- Forwarded by Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT on 10/20/2000 06:55
AM ---------------------------

Rick Johnson@ENRON
10/19/2000 04:39 PM
To: Craig Hiddleston/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peter del Vecchio/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian
Schaffer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: Georgia Pacific Due Diligence -- Availability of data

Craig - My Data Room Request will in part be duplicate to the materials that
Michelle Cash will be asking for.  Because I'm in a separate Location -
Please provide me copies from the data room, (as requested on the attached
word doc.) and FED-EX direct to my Portland Office Address

 Rick Johnson -  Enron Corp.
 121 SW Salmon St. ( 3WTC0306)
 Portland,  OR.  97204
Thanks, Rj.

Craig Hiddleston
10/17/2000 07:33 PM
To: Peter del Vecchio/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rhett Jackson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michelle
Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fran L Mayes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dolores
Lenfest/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rick Johnson/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tommy J
Yanowski/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Marshall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Connor/NA/Enron@Enron,
Robert E Anderson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan
Worthen/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Don
Stevens/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Dwight Beach/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Georgia Pacific Due Diligence -- Availability of GP representatives
post-data room visit

In response to the question posed by numerous people today, we will have
access to various GP representatives through calls coordinated through Morgan
Stanley but it is unlikely that you will have access to GP contact people to
repeatedly ask questions.

As requested this afternoon, please provide me a detailed list of the
documents listed on the data room index that you want copies of (and other
relevant documents) no later than 10AM on Wednesday morning.

Thanks,
Craig