---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 06/20/2000 01:17
PM ---------------------------

Kay Mann
09/02/1999 08:34 AM
To: Robert E MacMillan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: David Barru/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John
Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Eddie
Clay/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jerry D
Martin/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Bill
Harris/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Erik
Kingshill/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Keith
Marlow/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ed
Giblin/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Robert E
MacMillan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Dick
Westfahl/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jamie
Dunlap/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Larry L
Izzo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mary E
Garza/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Re: EPC 43/50 (Demar)

Bob (and others),

The line  of credit on EPC 4 is expired, and I believe tapped out, if you add
in the fee to Enron ($5mm?) which remains unpaid.   Another option would be
to try to get a security interest in the revenues on 4 for the new project.
I have been looking in to this option since you, Erik and I discussed this
possibility.  Input from Mexican counsel will be required and has been
sought.

Dick has scheduled a meeting for later today when we can brainstorm on these
options.  I'm confident that there will be a way to skin this cat, it just
may take a few days to sort through.

Kay

Robert E MacMillan
09/02/99 07:44 AM
Sent by: Robert E MacMillan
To: David Barru/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: John Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kay
Mann/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Eddie
Clay/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jerry D
Martin/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Bill
Harris/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Erik
Kingshill/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Keith
Marlow/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ed
Giblin/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Robert E
MacMillan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Dick
Westfahl/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jamie
Dunlap/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Larry L
Izzo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mary E
Garza/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Re: EPC 43/50 (Demar)

David,

To mitigate the risk of funding Demar before an assignment of contract
revenue for the EPC-43/50 offshore work is in place we could seek written
confirmation from Demar that the present assignment of contract revenues can
be utilized to cover early advances for this new work.  It is my
understanding that there is in excess of $60MM to collect and the present
$20MM line of credit is funded to $16MM+.

The collateral in place is a barge worth approximately $12MM, property in Cd.
del Carmen worth approximately $3.2MM and a house in Mexico City worth
approximately $500,000.  Obviously the source of repayment is the revenue
from the Pemex contract EPC-4 which we receive in a bank account controlled
by Enron.

Practically, the Pemex contract will likely take 30 days to execute and an
assignment of contract revenues which can only be requested after the
contract execution, will take approximately 1 week to have in hand.  Due to
urgent nature of the work, that is, it will start immediately upon advice of
award from Pemex, Demar can not wait some 40 days for funding.

Our experience with Demar has been good, so good as a matter of fact that we
have decided not to provide the administrative support in Cd. del Carmen and
Mexico City to which we are  obligated in our agreement with Demar.

I ask all members of the team to consider the possibility of funding
initially under the EPC-4 agreements, which need to be extended in any event
and to add language to cover this issue would be fairly straight forward.

Bob MacMillan


Return-Path: <Anjam.Ahmad@enron.com>
Received: from  rly-yh04.mx.aol.com (rly-yh04.mail.aol.com [172.18.147.36])
by air-yh03.mail.aol.com (v73.13) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 May 2000 13:48:07 -0400
Received: from  postmaster.enron.com (outbound5.enron.com [192.152.140.9]) by
rly-yh04.mx.aol.com (v71.10) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 May 2000 13:47:40 -0400
Received: from mailman.enron.com (mailman.enron.com [192.168.189.66]) by
postmaster.enron.com (8.8.8/8.8.8/postmaster-1.00) with ESMTP id MAA21367 for
<vkaminski@aol.com>; Wed, 24 May 2000 12:47:39 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from dserv1.ect.enron.com (dserv1.ect.enron.com [172.16.1.37]) by
mailman.enron.com (8.8.8/8.8.8/corp-1.03) with ESMTP id MAA29789 for
<vkaminski@aol.com>; Wed, 24 May 2000 12:47:25 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from notes.ect.enron.com (ecthou_gt2.corp.enron.com [172.16.4.33])
by dserv1.ect.enron.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id MAA05924 for
<vkaminski@aol.com>; Wed, 24 May 2000 12:47:38 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by notes.ect.enron.com(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.5  (863.2 5-20-1999))
id 862568E9.0061BABE ; Wed, 24 May 2000 12:47:27 -0500
X-Lotus-FromDomain: ECT
From: "Anjam Ahmad" <Anjam.Ahmad@enron.com>
To: "Shirley Crenshaw" <Shirley.Crenshaw@enron.com>
cc: "Grant Masson" <Grant.Masson@enron.com>, vkaminski@aol.com
Message-ID: <862568E9.0061B982.00@notes.ect.enron.com>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2000 18:45:17 +0100
Subject: Dates for Houston Visits
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Mailer: Unknown

Hi Shirley,

[I just called Vince now as you said]

As promised, below are the final dates - it looks like we'll have to move the
dates back as there is no way I can be in Houston as early as June as I have
commitments already booked - there is a chance in early or mid July, but I'd
rather stay flexible and therefore will opt for a hotel to be expensed in
London
later.

Matthew Williams         Mon 31st July through Friday 18th August
Steve Leppard            Mon 21st Aug through Fri 15th Sep
Kirstee Hewitt           Mon 18th Sep through Friday 13th Oct
Ben Parsons              Mon 16th Oct through Friday 10th Nov

I think the best thing would be to arrange for the period Saturday 29th July
to
Sunday 12th November to cover the travel arrangements at each end.

Thanks,

Anjam
x35383


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/13/2001 09:35
AM ---------------------------

lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com on 03/13/2001 08:47:21 AM
To: lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com, Dale.Rasmussen@enron.com,
Bill.Williams@enron.com, Kay.Mann@enron.com
cc: tconstan@llgm.com, kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com

Subject: RE: GE LM-6000 purchase contract for Las Vegas Cogeneration II pr
oject

Bill/Dale-

Lee Moore pointed out what he thought was an inconsistency in the definition
of Heat Rate in 1.41, relative to the rest of the document for Peformance
Testing (Exhibit F) and the concept of guarantees based on Adjusted
Electrical Output and Adjusted Heat Rate.  As a result, we redlined the
definition of 1.41 to be sure all understood that Heat Rate calculations for
the purpose of the Performance test would based on Output measured at the
generator terminals net of Unit auxiliary loads as measured during the test.

Hope this helps your reach agreement on the EPC side of things.

Regards,

Lee

-----Original Message-----
From: Johnson, Lee L (PS, SSEP)
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2001 3:26 PM
To: 'Dale.Rasmussen@enron.com'; Bill.Williams@enron.com;
Kay.Mann@enron.com
Cc: 'tconstan@llgm.com'; Shoemaker, Kent (GEAE)
Subject: RE: GE LM-6000 purchase contract for Las Vegas Cogeneration II
project

Bill/Dale/Kay-

I've made redline edits with regards to LVCII performance guarantee values
in Section 10.7 for output and heat rate based on the Feb 8, 2001 guarantee
sheet.

Dale, please send revised LVC II facility agreement to reflect Units 25-28
with appropriate schedules for price, delivery, payment and termination
schedules at your earliest convenience.

The units 19-20 and 23-24 that are currently reflected in this document will
be left in E-Next (Turbopark).  The schedules for price, delivery, payment
will remain the same for these units.

Thanks,

Lee

-----Original Message-----
From: Dale.Rasmussen@enron.com [mailto:Dale.Rasmussen@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2001 3:03 PM
To: Johnson, Lee L (PS, SSEP); Bill.Williams@enron.com;
Kay.Mann@enron.com
Subject: GE LM-6000 purchase contract for Las Vegas Cogeneration II
project

Bill Williams asked me to forward the attached execution form of the
LM-6000 purchase contract.

The second attachment is to be inserted as Exhibit H-2 in the contract.  I
understand that we received it from GE, and that it is available only in
pdf format.

Thanks.

(See attached file: Training LM6000.pdf)(See attached file: LV Cogen Gas
Turbine Purchase Agreement - Version 5.DOC)

 - LV Cogen Gas Turbine Purchase Agreement - Version 5_redline031201.DOC


Fine.


Sally,
As of this hour, I've received 86% of the evaluations for mid-year.   There
are only 56 remaining to be executed.   Below is the updated spreadsheet.
hgm


hey:
when are you back in town??


I recommend that we consider filing a motion for summary rejection of the
ISO's proposal on the ground that it is the product of an illegal board
seated in violation of FERC's governance orders that is a highly politicized
tool of Governor Davis, rather than an independent body.  In addition to the
legal arguments for dismissal, we could also rebut the ISO's economic and
market analysis.


Lowest rates in 37 YEARS!!

 How long will it last?

 Get a FREE NO OBLIGATION Mortgage Rate Quote NOW.

 Don't waste money EVERY SINGLE MONTH!!

 Simply fill out our FREE NO OBLIGATION form and
 find out how much you can save every single month.

 It's That Easy!

 Visit our website:
  http://www.emediatemail.com/greatrates/

 ================================================

 To be removed, click below, and send:
 mailto:nowremove@mail2.emediatemail.com?subject=autoremove


Kim,

Crazy as a fox in a mini-skirt and heels.

Laird


I love this one.

To be happy you must have taken the measure of your powers; tasted the fruits
of your passion and learned your place in the world.

           -- George Santayana


Nov 2.92, Dec 2.56, Jan 2.67...I will get Feb.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hanagriff, Richard
Sent:	Friday, March 01, 2002 7:06 PM
To:	Lokay, Michelle
Subject:	Mojave index

Would you please e-mail me the Mojave indexes for Nov, Dec, Jan, and Feb

thanks


Starting next Wednesday you have EB30C2 for your Fundies Meeting from 3:00 PM to 4:30 PM

-Ina


Please note that all of the communications below are priveleged and
confidential attorney client communciations.

What do you think the possible liabilities are from the Toxic Waste created
below.  Ouch !!!  Maybe the attorneys need to conduct a seminar.

John Novak
02/28/2001 06:42 AM
To: Richard A Lammers/SA/Enron@Enron
cc: Eddy Daniels/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard A Lammers/SA/Enron@Enron, "Lefler,
Dean" <dlefler@velaw.com>, Rob G Gay/NA/Enron@Enron, "Federico Cerisoli
(E-mail)" <federico.cerisoli@enron.com>, "Gabriela Aguilar (E-mail)"
<Gabriela.Aguilar@Enron.com>

Subject: Re: YPF Consent

Please note that all of the communications below are priveleged and
confidential attorney client communciations.

In the future, please remember to mark all such emails "CONFIDENTIAL/ATTORNEY
CLIENT PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION".

Thank you.
 John

Richard A Lammers
02/26/2001 07:33 PM
Sent by: Richard A Lammers
To: Eddy Daniels/NA/Enron
cc: Richard A Lammers/SA/Enron@Enron, "Lefler, Dean" <dlefler@velaw.com>, Rob
G Gay/NA/Enron@Enron, "Federico Cerisoli (E-mail)"
<federico.cerisoli@enron.com>, "Gabriela Aguilar (E-mail)"
<Gabriela.Aguilar@Enron.com>, "Novak, John (Enron)" <john.novak@enron.com>

Subject: Re: YPF Consent

this is also an ok approach .Please clear with Eddy

From: Eddy Daniels on 02/26/2001 02:45 PM CST
To: Richard A Lammers/SA/Enron@Enron, "Lefler, Dean" <dlefler@velaw.com>, Rob
G Gay/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: "Federico Cerisoli (E-mail)" <federico.cerisoli@enron.com>, "Gabriela
Aguilar (E-mail)" <Gabriela.Aguilar@Enron.com>, "Novak, John (Enron)"
<john.novak@enron.com>
Subject: Re: YPF Consent

Rick, Dean & Rob --

I have some hesitations about having the Bank say re the conditions to the
GSA cannot be satisfied.  I suppose we are not really concerned that YPF will
anticipatorily cancel the GSA, but t would seem to be an invitation to them
to do that.

Also, do we really want the Banks to say it is not fruitful to proceed with
the consent?  Would it be better for the Banks simply to stick to their guns
re the consent, decline all of YPF's suggested changes, and insist on their
version of December 2000.  That way, YPF could be portrayed as partly to
blame for failure to achieve a financial close by May 4, 2001.  It might help
deflect the argument that we had control over all of the C.P.s and rigged it
to get out of the GSA.

What do you think?

	Richard A Lammers
	Sent by: Richard A Lammers
	02/26/2001 01:15 PM

		 To: "Lefler, Dean" <dlefler@velaw.com>
		 cc: "Lammers, Rick (Enron)" <richard.a.lammers@enron.com>, "Gabriela Aguilar
(E-mail)" <Gabriela.Aguilar@Enron.com>, "Federico Cerisoli (E-mail)"
<federico.cerisoli@enron.com>, "Novak, John (Enron)" <john.novak@enron.com>,
"Eddy Daniels (E-mail)" <Eddy.Daniels@enron.com>, Rob G Gay/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: YPF Consent

Please proceed along the lines you suggest in your discussion with schumacher
and Rob/Rick needs to talk to the business people at the Bank. Lets see if
the Lenders can respond in writing.

"Lefler, Dean" <dlefler@velaw.com> on 02/26/2001 02:24:27 PM
To: "Lammers, Rick (Enron)" <richard.a.lammers@enron.com>
cc: "Gabriela Aguilar (E-mail)" <Gabriela.Aguilar@Enron.com>, "Federico
Cerisoli (E-mail)" <federico.cerisoli@enron.com>, "Novak, John (Enron)"
<john.novak@enron.com>, "Eddy Daniels (E-mail)"  <Eddy.Daniels@enron.com>
Subject: YPF Consent

A quick update in regards to Doris Rodriguez's letter regarding the YPF
Consent:

I have left a message for David Schumacher asking that he call me to Doris's
letter.  Given the current status of things, it would seem to me that there
is no value in proceeding with the consent.  On the other hand, we need to
continue to build our case in the event of an arbitration with YPF.  It
would seem to me that the best thing would be for the lenders to tell Doris
that the lenders'  understanding is that, under the current project
schedule, the conditions precedent under the YPF GSA cannot be satisfied,
and that Enron and YPF have had some discussions regarding this issue and
will continue to discuss the issue.  Until the YPF GSA is restructured in
some form, there is little value in proceeding on the consent, especially
given that YPF and the lenders are still so far apart on the consent.

The status of the YPF consent is as follows: Doris sent a revised draft of
the consent to the lenders in August 2000.  The lenders responded with
comments (which included several of my comments) in October 2000.  Doris
then responded with a counter-draft in December 2000.  Doris' latest draft
again had numerous, significant comments, which I have not thoroughly
reviewed.  A quick review, however, indicates that Doris has cut in half
many of the time periods for the lenders to cure SCG defaults.  In addition,
Doris has restructured several provisions in order to make certain YPF
commitments run in favor of SCG only and not the lenders, which may be of no
value to the lenders in a situation in which the lenders have to step into
SCG's shoes.  I am confident that the lenders will not accept Doris's
comments, since many are proposals the lenders have rejected before.

Let me know whether I should suggest to Dave Schumacher a response to Doris
along the lines I recommend.

Regards, Dean
          ++++++CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE+++++
The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged.  This
email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization
named above.  If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized
representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any,
or the information contained herein is prohibited.  If you have received
this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email
and delete this email from your system.  Thank You


In furtherance of our discussions of last week, please find attached a copy
of the following:

1.  a draft request for collateral; and
2. a draft amendment to the Master Physical Agreement with Petro-Canada Oil
and Gas.

Please be advised that Tana Jones is preparing the amendment to the ISDA
Agreement with Petro-Canada and is to forward the document to me via e-mail.
Once you have had an opportunity to review the attached documents, please
give me a call.  I expect to be in the office throughout this week.

Regards,

Mark Powell (6708)

Barry Tycholiz
06/28/2000 08:32 AM
To: Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT, John Suttle/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Powell/CAL/ECT@ECT, Eric LeDain/CAL/ECT@ECT, Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Petro-Canada Amendments to Master Firm and Master Swap

Further to my conversation with some of you, please consider this note as a
action item to raise the applicable paper regarding both PCOG and PC.

I have discussed credit related matters with Heather Scott from PC, and she
is ok with the amendments that I have proposed.  She understands where ECC is
coming from and is hopeful that before we ask PC for a LC we ensure that the
credit allocations with PC are set up properly. ( that's step 1).  Then ECC
can make the proper determination on exposures.  Prior to a LC request, PC
would like to work on commercial initiatives if possible.

1) Peter/Mark can we raise the letters that will amend the agreements as
required?
2) Change collateral Threshold on the Master Firm between PCOG and ECC from
25,000,000 US$ to  $ 45,000,000 US $.
3) Reduce collateral Threshold on Master Swap between PC and ECC from $
25,000,000 US$ to $ 5,000,000 US$.
4) Mark, can you please review the corporate structure of PCHC ( US)
regarding either Limited tor General Partnership and the issue related to the
Guarentee that we have from PC. ( have they capped their liability to us or
is this a redundant provision?).

Heather Scott will be away on holidays from today until the 18th of July. Can
we please have this paper waiting for her when she get's back.

Any questions regarding this note, call me.  Barry


Kim:

thanks for passing this on.  For my info, what is the minimum volume your
group likes to work with.  We have other customers and I want to make sure I
include you in other sourcing events as they fit your profile.

Derek:

when do you think you can get back to me on this?  Can you email me your
contact information.  Look forward to working with you.

Best Regards,

Walter Rogers
bluInc
(713) 942-0631 office
(832) 264-3222 cell
(413) 803-5661 e-fax
www.bluinconline.com
wrogers@bluinconline.com

****************************************************************************
***********************************
This message is intended only for the use of the Addressee(s) and may
contain information that is PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not the
intended recipient, dissemination of this communication is prohibited.  If
you have received this communication in error, please erase all copies of
the message and its attachments and notify the sender.
****************************************************************************
***********************************

-----Original Message-----
From: Ward, Kim S (Houston) [mailto:Kim.Ward@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 10:24 AM
To: walter.rogers@insync.net
Cc: Kelly, Derek
Subject: RE:

Walter,

I was out sick most of the day yesterday.  Sorry.  These volumes are
really small for me to work with since I am on the Wholesale side of
Enron.  However, I have passed the information and your name on to Derek
Kelly who works with our retail customers out of the San Francisco
office.  If he is not able to help you - please let me know.

Thanks,

Kim

>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	"Walter Rogers2" <walter.rogers@insync.net>@ENRON
> [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Walter+20Rogers2+22+20+3Cwalter+2Erogers+40insyn
> c+2Enet+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
> Sent:	Tuesday, June 26, 2001 5:48 PM
> To:	Ward, Kim S (Houston)
> Subject:
>
> was the load info I sent you what you needed?
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Walter Rogers
> bluInc
> (713) 942-0631 office
> (832) 264-3222 cell
> (413) 803-5661 e-fax
> www.bluinconline.com
> walter.rogers@insync.net
>
> **********************************************************************
> ******
> ***********************************
> This message is intended only for the use of the Addressee(s) and may
> contain information that is PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL. If you are
> not the
> intended recipient, dissemination of this communication is prohibited.
> If
> you have received this communication in error, please erase all copies
> of
> the message and its attachments and notify the sender.
> **********************************************************************
> ******
> ***********************************
>
>
>  - winmail.dat << File: winmail.dat >>


any news on Alliance?       i haven't heard shit!   bye


Larry, go get 'em.  Whatever you can get you can keep and reduce the fee.
You could make this easy for both of us.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 08/09/2000
03:59 PM ---------------------------

Larry L Izzo@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
08/09/2000 02:03 PM
To: Joseph W Sutton/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, David W Delainey@ECT
cc:
Subject: SIEMENS/WESTINGHOUSE DISPUTES

Currently, Enron has several contractual disputes with Siemens/Westinghouse.
These include:  $5-10MM lingering from Marmara; about $4-5MM on Puerto Rico;
and maybe $1-3MM on the Gleason and Indiana Peakers.

In my meeting with Randy Zwirn yesterday, Randy suggested that I meet with
him in an attempt to come to a global settlement on all the Enron disputes.

I propose to do this.  I understand the strength of the contractual issues on
each of these projects and I think I can close out the issues by optimizing
the Enron leverage in one global settlement.  The process will take from
30-60 days as both sides collect all contractual arguments.

I'll keep ENA informed.

Let me know if either of you object to this global type approach.

LI35700


pls print and hand to me.  DF
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 10/18/2000
10:25 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Gary Zahn                           10/18/2000 09:54 AM

To: Keith Petersen/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ray Smith/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Elaine
Concklin/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Lee Huber/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bob
Chandler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rod
Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Vincent Strohmeyer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: FERC interviews in Omaha

Today, I received a data request (attached) which provides more specifics on
the interviews to be conducted in Omaha. Please note that they have asked to
meet with Keith Petersen and Ray Smith on an individual basis.  If the FERC
deems it necessary, they will interview individuals that report to them.


As I sit here this Wednesday morning and watch ENE trade $15.80 I can not begin to explain the pit in my stomach.  I have been an employee of Enron since June of 1984, I have never written a memo to my CEO to express opinions and or ask direct questions.
	I can not believe that the individuals that are responsible for this catastrophe are still employed.  And I guess I need to understand why?  FIRED THEM !   It is apparent to me  that the information we have given to the market place is not sufficient enough.  "THEY" don't trust us anymore.  Get a plan of action, attack it, and save this company.


If you would like to call us the tele# is 801-324-5015.
Gaylen


Attached is the Yates Contract Price Renegotiation Letter.  Let me know if
you have any questions.


Looks like Mark already changed this to 3/28 to 3/31 - looks good to me.

Kerri Thompson@ENRON
03/26/2001 02:07 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: apb check out

561213

broker has the term the 28-31

thanks


good idea.  i'll bring it up.


I spoke with Wally Schlink of Rochester today in follow up to our c-call.  He
thought the call went well; however, he still fees the main point is the
price for the PPA.

RPU will be meeting with their Financial Advisor on Monday and they plan to
then meet internally and figure what they would want from Enron to do the
deal.  I believe the will give us their number next week and we will know
where to head from there.

In the interim we need to be working on the following:

1.  Response to the RFP in their format
2.  Prepare a bid bond and get an understanding as to what it may bind us to
do.

I would like for Russ to take lead on these matters.

Note that we cannot go forward with Rochester unless we are technically in
the process.

Oscar


Rick,

it was good to meet you this afternoon.

As promised, I attach a copy of our org chart for your info.

     Mark


please add a box of packaged peanuts

thanks


The next Government Affairs-The Americas meeting will be held in Houston, TX
at the DoubleTree Hotel on Friday, December 8, 2000.  A block of rooms has
been reserved under "Enron Corp - Government Affairs" and each individual is
required to make their own reservation.  The group dinner will be held on
Thursday, December 7 at Ruggles Restaurant, Enron Field at 7:00pm.  Please
let me know of your plans to attend the dinner and meeting by Wednesday,
November 15.

Hotel information below:

DoubleTree Hotel
400 Dallas Street
Houston, TX 77002
713-759-0202  Phone #
713-654-0727  Fax#

Additional information regarding the meeting will follow, but please remember
to make your reservation and call me if you have any questions.

gngr
713-853-7751


All offers being confirmed as per thursday, additional 3 going out per John L today, expanded the number being brought into the program.

thanks, karen.

-----Original Message-----
From: Kitchen, Louise
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 11:14 AM
To: Buckley, Karen
Subject: Re: Trading Track offers

What happened?
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld


Looks like our exposure is less than $25,000.  Please call me.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/05/2001 10:54
AM ---------------------------

"Keffer, John" <JKeffer@KSLAW.com> on 04/05/2001 10:50:49 AM
To: "C. Kay Mann (E-mail)" <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: FW: Delta - HSR Issues

-----Original Message-----
From: Campbell, Carolyn
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 2:40 PM
To: 'kay.mann@enron.com'
Cc: Keffer, John
Subject: Delta - HSR Issues

Kay:

I just spoke with Bill Blumenthal (our HSR expert).  He and Paul Hastings'
HSR expert have traded voice mails exchanging information, but have not yet
spoken.  Bill says that Delta is apparently relying on the "ordinary course"
exemption, which may be fine if all the LLC wants to do is hold turbines for
re-sale.  If the LLC works on development of a power plant, the analysis
would be different.  In any event, Bill agrees that the only safe thing to
do is provide now for the possible requirement to file later.

Prior to speaking with Bill, I also spoke with Greg Lang.  He agrees that we
should provide now for the possible requirement to file later.  He again
asserted that since this is "Enron's structure," Enron should agree to bear
50% of any filing fee.

Steve Thome indicated earlier today that Enron may be willing to bear half
of the filing fee.  Under current regulations, the filing fee will be $45k
if, at the time the put/call is exercised, the assets have a fair market
value of $50-100 million, and the filing fee will be $125k if, at the time
the put/call is exercised, the assets of the LLC have a fair market value of
$100-500 million.

Please let me know whether to advise Greg that Enron will accept
responsibility for half the filing fee.  Thank you.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King & Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com>

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.


FERC MEETINGS FOR NOVEMBER AND DECEMBER 2001
          Meeting Dates, Times and Agendaare Subject to Change by FERC without Notice
If you are interested in FERC Openand Special Meetings throughout the year you may way to consider a Yearly Internet Package which includes: Open and Special Meetings covered by the Capitol Connection and unlimited access to the Archives (available for 3 months).
                      SPECIAL MEETINGS FOR NOVEMBER AND DECEMBER 2001
The Capitol Connection is pleased to announce that it will broadcast (via the internet and telephone) the following Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Special Meeting:
Wednesday, Nov. 27, 2001, 8 a.m. - 7 p.m. MST - (10 a.m.  9 p.m. EST)
Topic:  Generation Interconnection Activitiesand related Matters.  This conference is being held at the Holiday Inn Denver International Airport in Denver Colorado.  The conference is available via Phone Bridge Only.
Click Here for Contract         Agenda
Thursday, Nov. 28, 2001, 8 a.m. - 2 p.m. MST - (10 a.m.  4 p.m. EST)
Topic:  Generation Interconnection Activitiesand related Matters.  This conference is being held at the Holiday Inn Denver International Airport in Denver Colorado.  The conference is available via Phone Bridge Only.
Click Here for Contract          Agenda
Tuesday, Dec. 4, 2001 8 - 5 p.m. ET
Topic:  Generation Interconnection Activities.  This meeting is being held in the Commission Meeting Room in Washington, DC.   This meeting is available via the Internet and Phone Bridge only.
Click Here for: Contract          Agenda
Wednesday, Dec. 5, 2001 8 - 5 p.m. ET
Topic:  Generation Interconnection Activities.  This meeting is being held in the Commission Meeting Room in Washington, DC.   This meeting is available via the Internet and Phone Bridge only.
Click Here for: Contract           Agenda
Thursday, Dec. 6, 2001 8 - 5 p.m. ET
Topic:  Generation Interconnection Activities.  This meeting is being held in the Commission Meeting Room in Washington, DC.   This meeting is available via the Internet and Phone Bridge only.
Click Here for: Contract           Agenda
Monday, Dec. 10, 2001 10:00 a.m. ET
Topic:  Hydro Licensing Status Workshop.  This meeting is being held in the Commission Meeting Room in Washington, DC.   This meeting is available via the Internet and Phone Bridge only.
Click here for: Contract            Agenda
Tuesday, Dec. 11, 2001 10:00 a.m. ET
Topic:  Hydro Licensing Status Workshop.  This meeting is being held in the Commission Meeting Room in Washington, DC.   This meeting is available via the Internet and Phone Bridge only.
Click here for: Contract             Agenda
PLEASE NOTE: FERC has scheduled Interconnect meetings for the week of December 10-14, 2001. FERC has decided not to tape or broadcastthese meetings; therefore The Capitol Connection will not cover them. If you need additional information, please contact the Office of the Secretary at FERC.
                                        OPEN MEETINGS FOR DECEMBER 2001
The Capitol Connection is pleased to announce that it will broadcast the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Open Meetings on:
Wednesday, Dec. 19, 2001, 10:00 am ET            Click Here for Contract
Meeting dates and times are subject to change without notice. For current information, you can go to our website at www.capitolconnection.org  for a link to the FERC's page (you may need to Refresh your browser for the most current information to appear)  or you can go to the FERC's web page at www.ferc.gov  The FERC Office of the Secretary can be reached at 202.208.0400.
If you have an annual subscription to the Capitol Connection internet service, these meetings are included in the annual fee.  Please contact us if you are interested in signing up for either of these meetings or want to get an annual subscription to our internet service.
The Capitol Connection offers FERC meetings live via the Internet, as well as via phone bridge, and satellite, please visit our website at www.capitolconnection.org  or send e-mail to capcon@gmu.edu for more information. If there is a meeting you are interested in receiving, please call 703-993-3100.
Sincerely,
David Reininger


I think my ISP server is about to crash from 'Man Night' traffic.  When are we going to the GCCA crawfish boil at Tonys?

----- Original Message -----
From: Parks, Joe <mailto:Joe.Parks@bridgeline.net>
To: Fenner, Chet <mailto:Chet_Fenner@bmc.com> ; chad knipe <mailto:knipe3@msn.com> ; Brian Constantine <mailto:brianc@saltgrass.com> ; EriK Wollam <mailto:erwollam@hotmail.com> ; Brad Corrier <mailto:bcorrier@cox-internet.com> ; c.r.zander@att.net <mailto:c.r.zander@att.net> ; lawfeder@msn.com <mailto:lawfeder@msn.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 5:58 AM
Subject: RE: man night again?

what are you guys talking about?

-----Original Message-----
From: Fenner, Chet [mailto:Chet_Fenner@bmc.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 6:43 AM
To: 'chad knipe'; Fenner, Chet; Brian Constantine; EriK Wollam; Brad Corrier; c.r.zander@att.net <mailto:c.r.zander@att.net>; Parks, Joe; lawfeder@msn.com <mailto:lawfeder@msn.com>
Subject: RE: man night again?

Screw it, I'm going to Tony's.

-----Original Message-----
From: chad knipe [mailto:knipe3@msn.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 6:55 PM
To: Chet Fenner; Brian Constantine; EriK Wollam; Brad Corrier; c.r.zander@att.net <mailto:c.r.zander@att.net>; Joe.Parks@bridgeline.net <mailto:Joe.Parks@bridgeline.net>; lawfeder@msn.com <mailto:lawfeder@msn.com>
Subject: Re: man night again?

what

----- Original Message -----
From: Fenner, Chet
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 3:01 PM
To: 'chad knipe'; Fenner, Chet; Brian Constantine; EriK Wollam; Brad Corrier; c.r.zander@att.net; Joe.Parks@bridgeline.net; lawfeder@msn.com
Subject: RE: man night again?

I feel like Erik.  No one will answer my question.

-----Original Message-----
From: chad knipe [mailto:knipe3@msn.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 2:49 PM
To: Chet Fenner; Brian Constantine; EriK Wollam; Brad Corrier; c.r.zander@att.net; Joe.Parks@bridgeline.net; lawfeder@msn.com
Subject: Re: man night again?

sh"IN" - dig.......get it?  aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhh

----- Original Message -----
From: Fenner, Chet
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 5:11 PM
To: 'chad knipe'; Brian Constantine; EriK Wollam; Brad Corrier; Fenner, Chet; c.r.zander@att.net; Joe.Parks@bridgeline.net; lawfeder@msn.com
Subject: RE: man night again?

Where is this shin-dig?

-----Original Message-----
From: chad knipe [mailto:knipe3@msn.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 6:23 AM
To: Brian Constantine; EriK Wollam; Brad Corrier; Chet Fenner; c.r.zander@att.net; Joe.Parks@bridgeline.net; lawfeder@msn.com
Subject: Re: man night again?

in.

----- Original Message -----
From: Brian Constantine
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 8:26 AM
To: Erik Wollam; bcorrier@cox-internet.com; knipe3@msn.com; chet_fenner@bmc.com; c.r.zander@att.net; Joe.Parks@bridgeline.net; lawfeder@msn.com
Subject: RE: man night again?

I am IN!!! Would like to be there by 6:30 or so...maybe later. Zander is "out"...unless he brings Jake. Someone forward to Chambers...you know he's in.

BC

-----Original Message-----
From: Erik Wollam [mailto:erwollam@hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 5:25 PM
To: bcorrier@cox-internet.com; knipe3@msn.com; chet_fenner@bmc.com; c.r.zander@att.net; Joe.Parks@bridgeline.net; Brian Constantine; lawfeder@msn.com
Subject: man night again?

Zero response from my last effort on this matter. Are your emails working
men?

Zander called and suggested we attend the CCA crawfish boil function to be
held Thurday May 2, 2002. Reasonably priced event, beer, mud bugs and we can
sit back and watch pig win raffle prizes.

I'm in

e.

_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com

************************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Bridgeline Holdings, L.P. and/or its relevant affiliate(s) and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Bridgeline Holdings, L.P. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
************************************************************************


Enron Marketing Services, Inc. was dissolvewd 6/25/97

Enron Oil Trading & Transportation Company is a former name of EOTT Energy Corp., which merged out of existence.

Hope this helps.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Dixon, Billy D" <billy.dixon@bp.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Wednesday, October 31, 2001 4:27 PM
To:	Heard, Marie
Cc:	St. Clair, Carol; Jones, Tana
Subject:	RE: BP Master Netting Agreement

Please check on the following Enron entities to determine if they also need
to be added to the netting agreement:

Enron Marketing Services Inc.
Enron Oil Trading & Transportation

Our Canada business unit has deals with the above.

Many Thanks.

Very truly yours,

BILLY
Billy D. Dixon
Attorney
BP America Inc.
501 Westlake Park Blvd., Rm 16.166
Houston, Texas 77079
Direct 281/366-4745
Fax 281/366-5901
billy.dixon@bp.com

***IMPORTANT -- THIS EMAIL AND ANY ATTACHMENTS HERETO ARE ATTORNEY-CLIENT
AND/OR ATTORNEY WORK-PRODUCT PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL.  If you have
received this email in error, do not under any circumstances read, forward,
copy, disseminate or save this email or any of its attachments.  If you have
received this email in error, take the following actions: (1) reply to this
email indicating that you received this email in error, and (2) delete and
completely erase this email and its attachments from your computer and any
backup systems or "Deleted Items" folders.

-----Original Message-----
From: Heard, Marie [mailto:Marie.Heard@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 9:44 AM
To: Dixon, Billy D
Cc: St. Clair, Carol; Jones, Tana
Subject: BP Master Netting Agreement

Mr. Dixon:

Pursuant to Carol St. Clair's request, I am attaching our preliminary
list of the agreements to be under the BP Master Netting Agreement.
Since we don't own 100% of EOTT, any master netting agreement involving
EOTT will not be under this master netting agreement.

Please let us know if you have any questions or need anything else.

Marie Heard
Senior Legal Specialist
Enron North America Corp.
Phone:  (713) 853-3907
Fax:  (713) 646-3490
marie.heard@enron.com

				 <<BP Master Netting Agreement File
Index.doc>>

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


I'll do it and I appreciate everyone's efforts.    John

From: Tana Jones on 06/30/2000 09:52 AM CDT
To: John Malowney/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tracy
Ngo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shari Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Follow up....

I just spoke to John Cameron, the lawyer for the Company and our plan is to
email him, an associate of his, and Doug Thomas the draft as soon as it is
ready.    I will also fax John Cameron the draft.   Tracy Ngo in Credit is
working up the credit, and I am doing as much of the draft as I can pending
credit.  Carol St. Clair, a lawyer in our Group here in Houston, will be
reviewing the draft.  As this is moving quickly, please provide us with any
updates of information.

	John Malowney
	06/30/2000 09:36 AM

		 To: Robert McCullough <robert@mresearch.com>
		 cc: Doug Thomas <Doug.Thomas@bellcold.com>, John Cameron
<johncameron@dwt.com>, Tracy Ngo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shari Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Follow up....

Gentlemen, as we speak Enron's Credit and Legal teams are conversing on the
best way to approach, either an ISDA or a Long Form Confirm, for "papering"
the requested financial hedge.  Once Enron Credit is "comfortable" with
Bellingham Cold Storage (BCS), Legal will prepare the necessary
documentation, once approved by BCS/John Cameron, I will quote work up some
July executable numbers and attempt to contact the Robert, Doug, John C.
This will require everyone's joint efforts in order to accomplish this in
such a short time line.  BCS and John Cameron should anticipate a call from
either or Enron's Credit and Legal personnel.  Thanks,  John

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Robert McCullough <robert@mresearch.com>
06/30/2000 06:55 AM

To: John Malowney <John.Malowney@enron.com>
cc: Doug Thomas <Doug.Thomas@bellcold.com>, John Cameron
<johncameron@dwt.com>
Subject: Good morning!

We need numbers as soon as possible this morning -- also these must be
serious -- not notional.

I am at 771-5090.  I will be available at 784-3758 all day.  My email
follows me around so you can always get me  on email.


Hi, David,

I need to renew both SAS and SPSS in my computer. Thanks a lot!

Best,

Anthea

-----Original Message-----
From: JGSFAC -- Jones Graduate School faculty
[mailto:JGSFAC@listserv.rice.edu] On Behalf Of David Kilgore
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 5:21 PM
To: JGSFAC@listserv.rice.edu
Subject: [JGSFAC] SAS and SPSS Renewals

I need to coordinate our order for SAS and SPSS both renewals and new
orders.  These are on a university license and each one costs about $80
per
license.  The charge will be passed on to your research account.

Those of you with existing SAS installations, your version will keep
working until December.  At that time it will stop working unless
renewed.

SPSS is coming out with a version 11 and I have asked Mudd to let me
know
when that is available.

If you 1) need either of these packages now for a fresh installation or
2)
plan on renewing the software that you currently have installed, please
let
me know.
------------------
David Kilgore               Jones Graduate School - Rice University
kilgore@rice.edu          6100 S. Main - MS 531
713-348-5378               Houston, TX 77005


Anyone going?

 -----Original Appointment-----
From: 	Clay, Monica
Sent:	Friday, October 19, 2001 9:48 AM
To:	Keiser, Kam; McLaughlin Jr., Errol; Winfree, O'Neal D.; Love, Phillip M.; Bike, Anne; Gossett, Jeffrey C.
Cc:	Baumbach, David; Husain, Karima; Best, Kristine
Subject:	Adjusting a Warning Screen for traders.
When:	Monday, October 29, 2001 1:30 PM-2:00 PM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada).
Where:

A request was received by the Gas Tactical group that would have implications on the system you use.  The request was to have the existing warning window appear if the trader enters a date that is before the date of the trade.  Knowing that there are times where trades can be back dated we cannot restrict this but to have the trader see a warning window appear to make them double check their dates (if they are for a previous date) would be beneficial to the requestor.  If they know the date is correct they would have the option to continue with the terms.

Often times, due to human error, Book Admins see mistakes made where the trade date is 10/15/01 and the terms are 10/01/01 to 10/31/01.  Because we are in the middle of the month a red flag is being raised with the Book Admins to question this trade.  Often times it is found that it was a mistake.  To date the system will only show a warning window if the trade terms were for 9/01/01 to 9/30/01.

Request Review:  Is it possible to allow the existing warning window to display for a date that is before the trade date (even a day before) and not just for a different month?

Thank you in advance.

Monica Clay
7/345-7227


Dale,

Thanks for your message. In our phone conversation before the meeting  you
mentioned
another contractual arrangement under which we could work with  your  company
employees on a case-study.

The cost of a weekly project  would be $12,000 that would be applied to the
purchase price should
we go ahead and decide to acquire the software. This project would allow us
to evaluate the model and
come up with an estimate of the manpower necessary to support  the model
internally.

Please, let me know more about this option.

We are primarily interested in a long-term natural gas model and the database
for North America.
Unless a familiarity with the short term model is a prerequisite, we don't
have resources to spend too much time on it.

Of course, a trading desk may be interested in the short term
version of the model. I shall talk to them about it.

Vince

"Dale M. Nesbitt" <dale.nesbitt@worldnet.att.net> on 11/13/2000 06:00:05 PM
To: <john.goodpasture@enron.com>, "Vince. J. Kaminski"
<Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: MarketPoint License Agreement

John/Vince:

I really enjoyed the meeting the other day with you and a broad cross
section of your people.  Thank you very much for setting it up, and thank
you for giving me the opportunity to speak with your people.

As I mentioned to John, I am sending you the license paperwork for
MarketPoint.  I have attached our standard license agreement for your
consideration.  As I mentioned, the license agreement covers the entire
bundled product, which includes

? North American gas, short and long term
? North American electricity, short and long term
? World gas
? Western European gas
? World oil

We are just finishing porting the world oil, world gas, and western European
gas models over from our old (now obsolete) software system into
MarketPoint, so they will not be fully tested and complete for a couple of
months.  However, the gas and electricity models for North America are
presently complete and tested.  That should allow us to give you an
attractive price before the full worldwide toolkit is available throughout
your worldwide business.

As I understood it, you will want the gas modeling capability first and will
want to defer decisions on electric or other capability.  As I mentioned at
the meeting, we are prepared to offer that for approximately
 the fully
bundled price.  As you read the license agreement, you will see that the
software licenses for $100,000 annually, the gas data for $5,000, and the
electric data for $10,000.  MarketPoint will agree to license you the gas
model plus the data for
 the software license plus the data license for a
total of $55,000 annually.  This is just under
 the fully bundled price.  I
think that is consistent with the discussions at our meeting, and from
MarketPoint,s perspective would provide a great basis to move forward
together with Enron.  If or when Enron ever desires to &scale up8 to another
model or model(s) from the MarketPoint portfolio, we will simply scale you
up to the entire license agreement.  This will allow you to decouple the gas
decision from any other decisions you might make.  (I will be glad to put
this additional pricing provision into the agreement if you decide to move
forward.)

I felt I was able to communicate the philosophy, scope, and operation of our
approach during the meeting and to deliver you much of the information you
might need to evaluate whether MarketPoint meets your needs.  I thought you
were able to see the depth and sophistication of the product yet at the same
time its simplicity and effectiveness.  I thought you were able to see the
benefits of the MarketPoint dimension of economic equilibrium as a
complement and supplement to other approaches you will assuredly use.  I
would be interested in your impressions and those of your colleagues.  I
look forward to your response and to moving ahead together.  We view you as
a very important prospective customer and client and will work with you to
earn and secure your business.

If you decide to license MarketPoint, we can arrange to transfer and mount
MarketPoint and the short term NARG model (which is the model we suggest you
begin with) and travel to Houston to deliver our 1
 day training seminar.
Our clients are usually very fluent after that 1
 day training seminar.
Thereafter, we would want you to work with the short term NARG model for a
few weeks while you get up to speed, very fluent, and very comfortable
before you take delivery of the longer term version of NARG several weeks
later.

Thanks again, and all the best.  If there is some item from the meeting that
I might have forgotten to send, please remind me.  My notes don't show
anything, but I was speaking a lot rather than writing notes during the
meeting and might have overlooked something someone wanted.

Dale Nesbitt
President
MarketPoint Inc.
27121 Adonna Ct.
Los Altos Hills, CA  94022
(650)218-3069
dale.nesbitt@marketpointinc.com
 - LICENSE.DOC


susan,
i don't know how to do that message thing!!  call me when you have a chance.
I will be at my desk after 5pm........Just got back on Sunday.  Will be here
a
month.  How are you?  What's new on work, men, other social front?  Things
good.  Let me know when you have time.

Darren
36661

Sorry, no steak nite tonight for this cowboy......


You can take me off of the email distribution for FX exposures also.  Thanks.


I will need to get feedback from Mark Taylor and then let you know.

---------------------- Forwarded by Jefferson D Sorenson/HOU/ECT on
08/22/2000 11:01 AM ---------------------------

Eric Gadd
08/22/2000 10:02 AM
To: Jefferson D Sorenson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Alfred Pennisi/NYC/MGUSA@MGUSA
Subject: Re: MG update

Jeff-

Thanks for the memo.  After meeting with Al Pennisi in NY on Friday and
discussing your memo, I am confident that all the issues you raise can be
addressed so that we can have MG London act as Enron's clearing broker.  I've
asked him to contact you to review in more detail.  Please let me know the
outcome and action plan - - - is it feasible to complete this week?

	From:  Jefferson D Sorenson                           17/08/2000 19:08

To: Eric Gadd/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: MG update

Please find attached an action plan to determine the feasibility of MG acting
as a clearing broker on Enron's behalf.
As indicated on my voice message please call me so that we can discuss. (713
853-5294)

Thank you,
Jeff
---------------------- Forwarded by Jefferson D Sorenson/HOU/ECT on
08/17/2000 01:02 PM ---------------------------

David P Dupre
08/17/2000 12:59 PM
To: Jefferson D Sorenson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: MG update


Ok, I found my Tennessee ID and password.  I've tested it out and it appears to be still working.

ID - 001076B
Password - plant
Domain - tgpl

Please let me know if you need me to do anything regarding the ENA Upstream storage on Tennessee.  I'm fairly aware of the situation since I was the one was the one who had argued with Tennessee back in October over the balance, as well as made the original sale to Sequent.

Thanks,

Kathy

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Versen, Victoria
Sent:	Tuesday, March 19, 2002 11:15 AM
To:	Kelly, Katherine L.
Subject:	ENA Upstream ID on Tenn

Chris is looking for an ENA Upstream ID on Tennessee.  Do you know of one and if it is still active?

Vicki


Attached in Word format are Hawaii II 125-O Trust documents marked against
the previous version circulated last week:

Closing Checklist (266026)
Distribution Agreement (265277)
Schedule to ISDA Master Agmt (265279)
Beneficial Interest Certificate (265276)
RADA (265275)
Second Amended and Restated Trust Agmt (265272)
Facility Agreement (265273)
Ex. F to Facility Agmt (Independent Auctioneer) (266746)
Ex. G to Facility Agmt (Swap Confirmation) (266745)
Ex. H to Facility Agmt (Transfer and Auction Agmt) (266163)
Ex. I, Part A to Facility Agmt (LLC Agmt) (266143)
Ex. I, Part B to Facility Agmt (LLC Agmt) (266137)
Subscription Agmt (265278)

Chris Krecek, Secretary/Legal Assistant
Andrews & Kurth L.L.P.
1717 Main Street, Suite 3700
Dallas, Texas 75201
Phone: (214) 659-4481
Fax: (214) 659-4401
Email: ckrecek@andrews-kurth.com

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:  The information in this e-mail (including any
attachments) is confidential, legally privileged and intended only for the
use of each recipient named above.  If you are not an intended recipient, you
must not read, use or disseminate this information.  If you have received
this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail
and delete this e-mail from your computer.
VIRUS WARNING:  Although this e-mail (including any attachments) is not
intended to contain any virus or defect that may affect your computer, you
are responsible for ensuring that no virus or defect exists.  The sender
disclaims any responsibility for any loss or damages arising from any virus
or defect associated with this e-mail.

 - 266746.doc
 - 265273.doc
 - 265275.doc
 - 265276.doc
 - 265277.doc
 - 265278.doc
 - 265279.doc
 - 266026.doc
 - 266137.doc
 - 266143.doc
 - 266163.doc
 - 266745.doc
 - 265272.doc


I'm going to put out an email this afternoon


NORTHERN NATURAL GAS

Reviewed Title V Operating Permit renewal applications with field teams for
Finney Co. 1, Finney Co. 3 and Fowler.  Contractor has made revisions and the
permit applications will be overnighted to the State of Kansas for Monday,
September 10, 2001 delivery.

TRANSWESTERN

EOTT

Started EPA 308 Request response Tuesday, September 4, 2001 at Russell,
Kansas and for EOTT releases in the Amarillo Region.  Large contingency of
employees worked jointly to provide files on each release experienced since
1998.  DES had Title V Operating Permits due so environmental coordinators,
Steve Mitchell and Monte Stebens, stayed in Russell until all files were
completed. DES would like to thank the environmental coordinators and all
other employees who worked on the information response.  Everyone did an
excellent job.

GENERAL INFORMATION

Submitted semi annual NSPS reports for P-1 and Plains C/S's.


Our legal group, ENA Financial Derivatives under Mark Taylor, utilizes Lotus
Notes for an integral database of contracts etc. in our daily work routine.
How will this database be transferred to the new system without loss of
capabilities?  Please advise Tana Jones of our legal group.  Mary Cook

Enron North America Corp.
Mary Cook
1400 Smith, 38th Floor, Legal
Houston, Texas   77002-7361
(713) 345-7732 (phone)
(713) 646-3490 (fax)
mary.cook@enron.com


I'm forwarding to each of you a fascinating document--Langley's proposal to
the DOE.  It looks like he's already been fairly specific about the interest
that the tribes will have in the various entities and contracts.  He also
promised DOE a 10 % power cost reduction (before he even knew what they were
currently paying).  He may have made some promises that are pretty to hard to
deliver on.  Developers are amazing.  DF


Status Report:

I spoke with Harvey Morris and the negotiation for an extension of time will
take place Friday morning.  He warned me not to expect 6 weeks, as that time
was required to negotiate and produce a protective order/confidentiality
agreement with the generators who received the first subpoenas.  He did
acknowledge that an extension was required, but made two points:  first,
that the staff is under tremendous pressure to hurry its investigation, and
secondly, that providing a partial response to requests that can be
accomodated quickly will be greatly appreciated "as a show of good faith".
He also indicated that the most recent batch of subpoenas went to almost 120
parties.

I will try to get as much of the 6 weeks as I can.  It would assist me if
representatives of EES and EPMI could scan the requests to see if, in fact,
there are items which could be provided in a shorter time frame and which
would not raise concerns about the disclosure of commercially sensitive
information.  I would like to be able to bargain for more time by offering
some information in the near term....if the strategy is to be give what we
can and strongly resist the most sensitive information.

Mike Day


Attached is a quick blurb on the major protests filed in the PGE/Sierra
merger.  There's good news and bad news.  The good news is that there were
only a couple of significant protests filed.  The bad new is that the
protests are quite significant.  In addition to the two protests Adam
addresses, there was a protest filed by the Nevada Public Service Commission,
and an additional protest filed by Truckee Donner.  The Nevada Attorney
General's Bureau of Consumer Protection also filed a brief protest.

We are getting a copy of the rest of the protests now and will have a more
detailed summary of all of the protests early next week.

Adam has been in touch with the Scadden attorneys and Peter Fox-Penner, the
economic consultant who performed the Appendix A market power analysis.  We
will be working closely with them to develop an answer to the protests.
Answers are due on May 18.

Please call me if you have any questions.

Sarah

"Wenner, Adam" <awenner@velaw.com> on 05/05/2000 12:16:44 PM
To: "'Novosel, Sarah'" <snovose@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Memorandum re: Interventions in PGE/Sierra Pacific Resources Mer ger
Application

 <<85876_1.DOC>> Attached is a summary of the substantive interventions and
of responses to the arguments.  Regarding the Truckee-Donner intervention,
Matt
Estes (Scadden) points out that the FERC will either require or not require
the hold
harmless extension, but won't go to hearing or otherwise delay the
proceeding to deal with it.

 - 85876_1.DOC


David,

Another trip in the cards. You can catch me at the office on wed
or next week at home.

Vince

"Walkup, David C (HOUSTONAS AS 582)" <dwalkup@pclient.ml.com> on 04/03/2000
03:43:31 PM
To: "'Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com'" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: RE: Hello

I am tentatively planning on being in The Woodlands Wednesday.  Should I
stop by the house that night or do we need to get together tomorrow or
Wednesday morning?
David C. Walkup
Financial Consultant
713-658-1685
800-456-9712

> ----------
> From:  Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com[SMTP:Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com]
> Sent:  Monday, April 03, 2000 4:35 PM
> To:  dwalkup@pclient.ml.com
> Subject:  Re: Hello
>
>
> David,
>
> Can you stop by on Wednesday?
>
> I shall be gone for a few days after this day.
>
> Vince
>
>
>
>
>
> "Walkup, David C (HOUSTONAS AS 582)" <dwalkup@pclient.ml.com> on
> 04/03/2000
> 01:21:45 PM
>
> To:   "'Vincent Kaminski'" <vkamins@enron.com>
> cc:
> Subject:  Hello
>
>
> Hello, Vince.
>
> I guess you are still traveling a lot.  I just wanted to say hello and see
> when we can get together and look at getting some more money deposited
> into
> the CMA for future investments.
>
> Get back with me when you can.
> David C. Walkup
> Financial Consultant
> 713-658-1685
> 800-456-9712
> ____________________________________________________________
>
>
>
>
> CAUTION: Electronic mail sent through the Internet is not secure and could
> be intercepted by a third party.  For your protection, avoid sending
> identifying information, such as account, Social Security or card numbers
> to
> us or others.  Further, do not send time-sensitive, action-oriented
> messages, such as transaction orders, fund transfer instructions, or check
> stop payments, as it is our policy not to accept such items electronicall
>
>
>
>
>
>
____________________________________________________________

CAUTION: Electronic mail sent through the Internet is not secure and could
be intercepted by a third party.  For your protection, avoid sending
identifying information, such as account, Social Security or card numbers to
us or others.  Further, do not send time-sensitive, action-oriented
messages, such as transaction orders, fund transfer instructions, or check
stop payments, as it is our policy not to accept such items electronicall


I have an early afternoon appointment.  Sara


Originals were sent via Federal Express Tuesday.


Dear Power Outage Database Customer,

Attached you will find an excel document. The outage contained within is
a
rescheduled outage. Your daily delivery will still contain this
outage.

In addition to the excel document, there is a dbf file that is formatted
like your
daily delivery you receive nightly. This will enable you to
load the data into your regular database. Any questions please let me
know. Thanks.

Greg Elliott
IIR, Inc.
713-783-5147 x 3481
outages@industrialinfo.com

THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS E-MAIL IS LEGALLY PRIVILEGED AND
CONFIDENTIAL
INFORMATION INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR
ENTITY NAMED ABOVE.  YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISSEMINATION,
DISTRIBUTION, OR
COPY OF THIS E-MAIL TO UNAUTHORIZED ENTITIES IS STRICTLY
PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS E-MAIL IN ERROR, PLEASE DELETE IT.

 - 012402R.xls
 - OUTAGE.dbf


Dear Mr. Skilling:

I write on behalf of Jerry Murdock, who is currently in Europe.  Mr. Murdock
asked me to pass on the following information regarding your telephone call
scheduled for 10:00am (CST) on Tuesday, May 15.

Insight Capital hosts a quarterly dinner with Robert Rubin and Steve
Friedman and other selected guests.  Our next dinner is scheduled for July
19 and will be held in Aspen, Colorado.  The Current State of the Global
Market will be one of the topics under discussion and Jack Welch of GE is
one of your fellow invitees.

The purpose of your conversation with Mr. Murdock is to discuss the above in
more detail and to more fully brief you on the purpose of these dinners.

Please do not hesitate to contact me should you require any further
information.

Erica Harris
Insight Capital Partners
680 Fifth Avenue
8th Floor
New York, NY  10019
(212) 230-9276

_______________________________________________________
This message may contain confidential and/or legally privileged information.
If it has been sent to you in error, please reply immediately to advise the
sender of the error and then destroy this message, any copies of this
message and any printout of this message.  If you are not the intended
recipient of the message, any unauthorized dissemination, distribution or
copying of the material in this message, and any attachments to the message,
is strictly forbidden.


Enron Global Travel Management (a division of Global Strategic Sourcing) is
pleased to announce that American Express Corporate Cardholders can now view
account details Online.

Highlights of this service include:
 Review previously billed, current, and unbilled charges
 Review corporate direct payments and personal payments applied to your
account
 Dispute a charge online, if needed
 Access customer service 24 hours a day, 7 days a week

To Log On to American Express Online Services:
GSS has prepared a special registration/log on page for Corporate Cardmembers
for your convenience.  To access it, go to http://travel.enron.com and click
on the Corporate Card button.

Cardmembers with cards issued within the last 45 days, need to call American
Express customer service to enroll.  The number is 1-800-297-1234.

If you have already registered your Personal American Express Card in the
American Express Online Services program:
Please click on the "Check Your Bill" link and login using your existing User
ID and password.  You will be able to add your American Express Corporate
Card to your existing registration by clicking on the "Update your Online
Profile" link which appears on the left hand menu bar once you are logged in.

We hope you enjoy using American Express Online Services.

For questions or additional information, contact Tracy Ramsey (Director,
Global Travel Management) at 713/853-6457.


see below.

Federal price limits backfire
Some generators withhold power rather than abide by rate caps
David Lazarus, Chronicle Staff Writer
Wednesday, July 4, 2001
?2001 San Francisco Chronicle
URL: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2001/07/04/MN186091.DTL
Officials in California and Nevada, after months of lobbying for federal regulators to cap Western power prices, warned yesterday that the newly imposed limits have had the unintended consequence of increasing a threat of blackouts in the two states.
The warnings were issued as California came within minutes of rolling blackouts yesterday afternoon, and one day after the first-ever rolling blackouts in Las Vegas forced energy-hungry casinos to shut off fountains and reduce air conditioning.
The two states are asking the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to take a closer look at the so-called price mitigation plan and come up with revisions that would deter power companies from withholding electricity during shortages.
"We need some clarity to this order," said Oscar Hidalgo, a spokesman for the California Department of Water Resources, which is spending billions of dollars to keep the state's lights on.
"Generators need to be held accountable," he said.
The crux of the problem is that price limits kick in during shortages, yet power companies say these caps force them to sell power at below-market rates during periods of high demand.
Some companies have responded by holding back power rather than face the expense of shipping electricity from state to state. Each mile that electricity must be transmitted adds to the overall cost.
"No one's going to pay for transmission if the cost is near the caps," said Gary Ackerman, executive director of the Western Power Trading Forum, an energy-industry association in Menlo Park.
Ackerman said several companies in his organization decided that there was no economic advantage to offering power in regional markets when price controls are in effect.
"This means individual regions like California or Las Vegas could end up not having enough," Ackerman said. "It increases the threat of blackouts."
BLACKOUT ALERT CANCELED
California authorities issued a blackout alert at 1:45 p.m. yesterday when power reserves dipped to dangerously low levels. They canceled the alert about an hour later, after finding additional supplies.
"Everyone in the West is fighting for megawatts," said Stephanie McCorkle, a spokeswoman for the California Independent System Operator, which oversees the state's power network.
The Golden State's latest brush with lights-out conditions came a day after Nevada experienced its own rolling blackouts for the first time, prompting heavy power users such as the MGM Grand and Caesars Palace to dim their lights.
Don Soderberg, chairman of the Nevada Public Utilities Commission, said that the sudden power emergency took state authorities by surprise and that they are investigating to see what role the federal price limits may have had in exacerbating Monday's shortage.
"We're looking very closely at this," he said. "There seems to be a potential for unintended consequences."
Specifically, Soderberg said Nevada is focusing on operators of older, less- efficient plants who would find profit margins shrinking, if not vanishing, under capped prices.
"We're going to see how the caps might have played into this," he said.
The federal ceiling in 10 Western states, excluding California, is about $92 per megawatt hour. In California, a 10 percent surcharge is added because of the state's credit risk, bringing the price to just over $101.
Ackerman at the Western Power Trading Forum said regional price controls have extended California's power crisis to neighboring states.
"California sneezed and the rest of the region caught the virus," he said.
'LAWYERS LOOKING FOR LOOPHOLES'
California and Nevada officials, however, said that they still have faith that price limits can stabilize Western electricity markets but that federal regulators may have to tweak the system so that power companies cannot withhold output.
"The generators have banks of lawyers looking for loopholes (in the plan)," said Hidalgo at the Department of Water Resources.
Unfortunately, it may take some time for the regulators to revisit an issue that they took up only with the greatest reluctance. For months, federal regulators refused to impose price controls, preferring instead to let supply and demand determine costs.
Hidalgo said that when it appeared that power companies were throttling back on output Monday, California officials immediately dialed the hot line number provided by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission in case of emergencies.
"No one answered," he said. "They were closed."
State officials tried again yesterday, and this time were told that the commission would look into the matter. They were not given a time frame for when the commission might come up with a response.
E-mail David Lazarus at dlazarus@sfchronicle.com .
?2001 San Francisco Chronicle    Page A - 1

Out-of-state generators pull plug over uncertainty on price controls
By Dale Kasler
Bee Staff Writer
(Published July 3, 2001)
Confused by the federal government's new controls on electricity prices, generators withheld so much power from California on Monday that the state was nearly plunged into rolling blackouts, state officials said.
The confusion began when the state's electric grid operators declared a Stage 1 power alert in the early afternoon, triggering the price caps for the first time since they went into effect June 21.
Out-of-state generators pulled about 1,500 megawatts of electricity off the table at midafternoon, enough to power about 1.1 million homes, because of uncertainty about how much they could charge under the new Federal Energy Regulatory Commission pricing system, said Oscar Hidalgo, spokesperson for the state Department of Water Resources. The department buys electricity for the state's financially distressed utilities.
"They didn't understand what they were going to be paid; there was confusion over the FERC order," Hidalgo said. "We saw 1,500 megawatts disappear."
The problem was exacerbated by a heat wave across the West, which forced California to compete with other states for scarce electricity, he said. Rolling blackouts hit southern Nevada.
Most California officials credit the FERC system, which is based on a variable price cap, with reining in what had been a runaway wholesale power market. But power generators have complained that the price caps, by limiting profits, could discourage the production of critically needed electricity. And as Monday's episode suggested, even the uncertainty about where the cap will fall could lead to unexpected shortages.
"That's the risk that you run (with price controls)," said Arthur O'Donnell, editor of the newsletter California Energy Markets. "People want any kind of certainty at all."
Hidalgo said the state avoided blackouts only because of last-minute imports from the Bonneville Power Administration, the federal agency that markets government-produced hydroelectric power in the Pacific Northwest. The state went into a Stage 2 power alert, the next-to-last level before blackouts are ordered. The alert was canceled in late afternoon.
The blackouts would have been the first in California since May 8.
FERC imposed a round-the-clock ceiling on power throughout the West. The price fluctuates and is tied to the production costs of the least-efficient plant operating in California during a "power alert" declared by the Independent System Operator, which runs the state's power-transmission grid. When there's no alert, prices can't exceed 85 percent of the cap that was established during the latest alert.
Until Monday, the maximum price held steady at about $101 a megawatt-hour in California. But when the ISO declared a Stage 1 power alert in early afternoon, signifying that reserve supplies had dwindled to less than 7 percent of demand, confusion set in, Hidalgo and others said.
Because of a steep drop in the price of natural gas, which fuels many California power plants, suppliers knew the cap would fall. But no one knew by how much until the price was posted by the ISO.
The ceiling for California fell to about $77 at 3 p.m. but was back up to $98 in two hours, according to the ISO. Those prices include the 10 percent premium that sellers can charge California because FERC said there's a credit risk in selling to the state.
O'Donnell said it's likely suppliers will pull back from the market every time the ISO declares a power alert.
In-state generators have to operate their plants if summoned by the ISO. But out-of-state suppliers can withhold supplies, and on Monday it was the out-of-staters that were pulling back, Hidalgo said.

The Bee's Dale Kasler can be reached at (916) 321-1066 or dkasler@sacbee.com .

Power Sales Halted by New Pricing Curbs
Electricity: Confused suppliers, unsure what they will be paid, refuse to sell to state, which asks FERC for a ruling but doesn't get it.

By NANCY VOGEL, Times Staff Writer

     SACRAMENTO--Confusion over new federal price restrictions prompted several electricity sellers to back away from sales to California on Monday afternoon, pushing the state closer to blackouts, energy officials said.
     The state lost sales that would have provided enough electricity to supply more than 1 million homes, said Ray Hart, deputy director of the California Department of Water Resources, which has been buying much of the state's electricity since January.
     At least five companies producing or marketing power "are telling us that since they don't know what they're going to get paid, they're not going to take the risk, and so they're not going to sell the energy," Hart said.
     The electricity sales fell through after power consumption soared in summer heat and grid operators were forced to declare a Stage 1 emergency, meaning reserves had dipped below 7%. It was the first such emergency since May 31.
     Under a June 19 order by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission intended to bring down wholesale electricity markets across the West, a power emergency in California triggers the setting of a new price limit that applies to power plant owners from Washington to Arizona.
     The new price is supposed to be based upon whatever it costs to run the most inefficient, expensive power plant selling electricity to California grid operators during the first full hour of a Stage 1 emergency.
     But much uncertainty remains about exactly how and when the new price is supposed to be established under the commission's order, and that apparently drove away sellers, Hart said.
     Shortly after the state issued the Stage 1 alert at 1:30 p.m., putting the old price limit of $90 per megawatt-hour in question, companies that had committed to provide the state electricity hour by hour Monday afternoon backed out, Hart said. The companies include TransAlta Energy Marketing of Oregon, Constellation Power of Baltimore and Sempra Energy Trading, a unit of the San Diego-based energy conglomerate.
     Forced to dip even deeper into the state's power reserves and declare a Stage 2 emergency, water agency officials called the federal energy commission's hotline for clarification about what the new price should be and when it should take effect. They got no answer.
     Hart said commission officials reached at home promised to try to clarify their order today. One outstanding question is what obligations power suppliers have to deliver electricity to California in an emergency.
     Both buyers and sellers in the market agree that the new price, when it is set, will probably be lower than $90 per megawatt-hour because the price of natural gas, the main fuel in California power plants, has dropped lately.
     Temperatures soared several degrees higher Monday than grid operators had anticipated. But they said they expected to avoid rolling blackouts in part because the Bonneville Power Administration in Portland, Ore., had agreed to provide several hundred megawatts of Pacific Northwest hydropower each hour in exchange for a return of electricity from California later this summer.
     "Bonneville is giving us emergency power to get us through," Hart said.

Copyright 2001 Los Angeles Times

James D Steffes
07/06/2001 10:04 PM
To:	Jeffrey T Hodge/Enron@EnronXGate, Robert C Williams/Enron@EnronXGate
cc:	Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Alan Comnes/Enron@EnronXGate, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron, Robert Frank/NA/Enron@Enron, Ray Alvarez/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, dwatkiss@bracepatt.com

Subject:	ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGDE - Draft FERC Brief on Settlement Process

The attached is a rough draft of a potential filing Enron would make in to Judge Wagner in the Settlement process (it is unclear if this would remain confidential per the gag order).

Please provide Ray Alvarez your comments.  This would be filed as early as Monday am.

Jim


This Sunday, starting at 5:00 AM, Emergency Power Systems for the WTC Complex will shut down to test the emergency backups.

This will not affect critical systems (computer room, phones, or the Real Time Group), as they are on both UPS and Generator.

It will affect many of the non - critical computers and office machines on the 3rd and 4th floors of Enron.
Please make every effort to power down all of your PC's and monitors when you leave for the day. Also, if you could help with a machine or 2 in your immediate area we would appreciate it.

The IT group will be coming through around 4-4:30 today to power down equipment not in use and I will be in before the outage on Sunday to complete this.

If you have any questions or concerns, please contact the IT dept. at any time.
Regards
Dave Steiner


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 04/04/2001
02:36 PM ---------------------------

Darnellmo@aol.com on 04/04/2001 06:45:26 AM
To: cgiron@mindspring.com, yhaynes@mindspring.com, Darron.C.Giron@enron.com,
KRISTI.GIRON@cfisd.net
cc: paulgrobasr@hotmail.com, mcnewsome@tmw.com, barbara.mcandrews@cfisd.net,
susan.cory@phschool.com
Subject: Fwd: Texans !!!

And this is from ?my Kansas brother!!!!
Return-Path: <jcmayers@earthlink.net>
Received: from  rly-yh05.mx.aol.com (rly-yh05.mail.aol.com [172.18.147.37])
by air-yh05.mail.aol.com (v77_r1.36) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Apr 2001 11:23:57
-0500
Received: from  mail1.kc.rr.com (fe1.rdc-kc.rr.com [24.94.163.48]) by
rly-yh05.mx.aol.com (v77_r1.36) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Apr 2001 11:23:31 1900
Received: from pavilion ([65.28.17.153]) by mail1.kc.rr.com  with Microsoft
SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.537.53);  Tue, 3 Apr 2001 10:20:33 -0500
Message-ID: <004d01c0bc63$0276d3e0$99111c41@kc.rr.com>
From: "Clark Mayers" <jcmayers@earthlink.net>
To: <Darnellmo@aol.com>
Subject: Texans !!!
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2001 10:24:59 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type:  multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_004A_01C0BC28.55F66A20"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.3018.1300
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.3018.1300

?
Texas Baby

A Texan buys a round of drinks for all in  the bar?because, he announces
his wife has just produced "a typical  Texas baby boy weighing 25 pounds."
Congratulations shower him from all  around, and many?exclamations of
"Wow!" are heard. A woman faints due  to?sympathy pains

Two weeks later, he returns to the bar. The  bartender?says, "Say,
you're the father of the typical Texas  baby?that weighed 25 pounds at
birth. How much does he weigh now?"

The proud father answers, "Seventeen pounds."

The bartender is  puzzled, concerned. "Why? What?happened? He already
weighed 25 pounds at  birth."

The Texas father takes a slow swig from his long-neck?Lone  Star, wipes
his lips on his shirtsleeve, leans into?the bartender and  proudly
says,? "Had him circumcised."

?


Thanks so much for you help!  I can't begin to tell you how many phone calls
I've had from people all over the world on this tiny matter.  Sara


we can get her a lap dance


gpiogtgiupuypoiuh


Daren:

You put this in, do have a clue?

Julie

---------------------- Forwarded by Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT on 03/13/2000 04:30
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Megan Parker @ ENRON                           03/13/2000 04:17 PM

To: Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Amoco Energy 2/00

We have a purchase deal in the system, 205116, for Feb. 2000 production that
Amoco does not show.  Can you tell me the trader's name at Amoco that the
deal was done with?

Megan


Mark
Senior Counsel, EWS
Phone:     713-345-8897
Facsimile: 713-646-3490
E-Mail:      Mark.Greenberg@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Mark Greenberg/NA/Enron on 05/16/2001 04:30 PM -----

	Kate Low <klow@loudcloud.com>
	05/07/2001 06:09 PM

		 To: Mark.Greenberg@enron.com
		 cc: Kathy Weber <kathy@loudcloud.com>
		 Subject: NDA with Enron Networks

Mark,

I have recently received the NDA with Enron Networks and have attached a
blacklined copy which indicates my requested changes.

Please let me know if the attached is acceptable or if you have any
questions.  I look forward to receiving your reply shortly.

Regards,

--
Kate Low
Contracts Specialist
599 N. Mathilda Avenue
Sunnyvale, CA  94085
Phone:  (408) 744-7842
Fax:    (408) 744-7384

 - Enron Networks 05-07-01.doc


According to the latest changes, below is an example of how the Long & Short
Prod. Description will appear on the website (for this specific example we
will need to have the complete name of the Delivery Location "BGE" and have
it on the Long Desc.)
Please let us know if it is Ok. or if you have any changes/comments
Thanks
Carlos


One of your friends sent this email through our website.
Friend's name: Angela Barnett
Friend's IP address: 192.152.140.9
Date and Time: 11/29/00 6:17:45 AM EST
See the bottom of this message to report abuse.

Hi,

Angela Barnett would like you to see this Web page:

http://www.daily-blessings.com/brother.htm

check this out!  :)

================================================
Angela Barnett also included this note:

================================================

Win a Billion Dollars!
Win a Billion Dollars!
Win a Billion Dollars!
Win a Billion Dollars!

go to:
http://mailbits.net/grab/taf.asp
Win a Billion Dollars !!!

____
***IMPORTANT NOTE***

This is a free service provided by MailBits.com.
Compared to regular email, this is a better way to
recommend a website to your friends. That's because
information about the sender of the message is included
to prevent and catch abuse of the system.

To report abuse of this service: abuse-taf@mailbits.com


The information contained in this e-mail message is legally privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named
above.  If the reader of this e-mail is not an intended recipient, you have
received this e-mail in error and any review, dissemination, distribution or
copying is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this e-mail in error,
please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and permanently delete
the copy you received.

Thank you.

 - Notesand.DOC
 - Exhibits.DOC
 - GasTurbi.DOC


Rick:
Four new projects have been added to the list of the hot deals for May 18,
2001.  They--and their suggested action items--are as follows:

 Project  Originator  Description
 GFU   Maria Foster  10 Year physical gas purchase ($11m) - Norway

 Suggested Action Item:  Communicate findings to Europe (Paul Hennemeyer -
Philip Davies) and compile GA comments for RAC, if any.

EES:
 Ownes Corning  Maureen Palmer Structure Credit (TBD)
 Suggested Action Item:  None.

EWS:
Leaf River   George McCormick Acquisition of SBSK pulp mill
Jupiter    Mike Beyer  Sale of Equity ($24.4)
 Suggest Action Item:  Communicate findings to J. Steffes, and Lisa Yoho and
compile GA comments for RAC, if any.

                                                      Please let me know if
you have any question or suggestion.

Brgrds

AI
3-3037


Just a quick note to welcome you and congradulate  you on your new endeavors.

Warmest Regards,
Sandra


COLUMBIA GAS TRANSMISSION CORPORATION
                        NOTICE TO ALL INTERESTED PARTIES
                                OCTOBER 27, 2001

Notice ID: 3220
5 - NO RESPONSE REQUIRED

SUBJECT: REV. CAPACITY ALLOCATION-TIMELY NOMINATION CYCLE FOR OCTOBER 28, 2001

PLEASE NOTE THAT ALL ALLOCATIONS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE BASED ON THE RECEIPT OF
ANY NEW NOMINATIONS OR INTRADAY NOMINATIONS.

RECEIPTS:

TENNESSEE:

UNIONVILLE:  New IPP received available capacity.

LEBANON AGGREGATE:  New IPP received available capacity.

TRANSCO:

EMPORIA:  New IPP received available capacity.

Excess MDWQ               Available +
ISS Withdrawals           Available
SIT Withdrawals           Available
Imbalance Drawdowns       Available

Excess MDIQ               Not Available +
ISS Injections            Not Available
SIT Injections            Not Available
Imbalance Paybacks        Not Available

PAL Lends/Unparks         Available
PAL Parks/Loan Paybacks   Not Available

+ Call Gas Control 24 hours in advance at (304) 357-2606 to request approval.

Columbia Gas Transmission has completed allocating all of its receipt and
delivery points for the gas day of October 28, 2001.  You may now view the
quantities you are authorized to flow on October 28, 2001.  On the Internet
NAVIGATOR, view Nominations, Scheduled Quantity, Scheduled Quantity for Service
Requestor-Summary, Nominations to be Viewed, and select Reduced Nominations.
The quantities confirmed to flow for your account are available on the Internet
NAVIGATOR after 5:30 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, October 28, 2001.

If you have any questions, please contact your Account Representative.


Jeanie,

I know I am probably becoming a pain in the butt about this ESOP clerical error issue but I would like to get this wrapped up before we go to UBS.  I do not believe that I will get any attention after I am no longer an Enron employee.  Should I contact Robert Jones directly?

Tom


For those of you who have been trying to access the PEP System, this morning
or today, stop trying.  There are still problems with the system and it is
unlikely that you will be bale to get in or submit your reviewers
successfully.

INSTEAD, please submit your list of reviewers to Brenda via e-mail.  She will
make any changes necessary and forward them on to the PEP Helpdesk.  They
will then be responsible for entering your reviewers manually.

If you have any questions, please call.

Thanx!
Yvette
x3.5953
---------------------- Forwarded by Yvette G Connevey/Corp/Enron on
05/18/2000 02:27 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Brenda F Herod @ ECT                           05/15/2000 12:41 PM

To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael Walters/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryan Hull/HOU/ECT@ECT, O'Neal D Winfree/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Yvette G Connevey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lisa Csikos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J
Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary M Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rita Wynne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve
Venturatos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Michael Eiben/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Performance Review - Mid-Year

It's that time of the year again - just earlier this year than last year!!!
Please log into the PEP system, when it becomes available, and select at
least five feedback reviewers.  The feedback is intended to reflect
interraction throughout the organization.  For leads and managers and
directors, please make sure you include at least one direct report.  The
reviewers you select should be employees whom you have worked with frequently
since 1/1/00 and whom can provide constructive feedback as to your
performance.  Nothing prevents you from selecting more than 5 reviewers.  I
will review them, and if I feel there are others whom should be added, I will
do so.  ASSUMING the system becomes available soon, please complete your
selection process by COB, Tuesday, 5/16/00.  I want to approve these ASAP, so
we can get our request out early.  Turn around is critical.

The next thing I will need is a listing of your accomplishments for 2000.  I
would like these by E-Mail by Monday, June 5, 10:00am.  Once again, the
timeline is critical to the process, and is not negotiable.

Although we have reorganized the Risk group effective 5/1/00, I will still
perform the performance reviews.  Mike, Steve will be responsible for your
review.

Let me know if you hav any questions or concerns.  Thanks for supporting the
process and the timeline!


she'll be one of the ut fans.  didn't kay go to ut as well?

---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: "Quigley, Dutch" <Dutch.Quigley@ENRON.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 14:28:07 -0500

>no but whe will be out numbered by ut fans
>
>>  -----Original Message-----
>> From: 	"siva66" <siva66@mail.ev1.net>@ENRON
>> [mailto:IMCEANOTES-
+22siva66+22+20+3Csiva66+40mail+2Eev1+2Enet+3E+40EN
>> RON@ENRON.com]
>> Sent:	Wednesday, September 19, 2001 2:25 PM
>> To:	Quigley, Dutch
>> Subject:	RE: UH ticket
>>
>> i just wanted to make sure that joanne would not be sitting
alone
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
>> From: "Quigley, Dutch" <Dutch.Quigley@ENRON.com>
>> Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 14:10:04 -0500
>>
>> >no there are two tix together but not with ours , i need to
check
>> and
>> >make sure they were not in the temp seats that are now closed
>> >
>> >I was planning on just sitting together and see what happens
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >>  -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: 	"siva66" <siva66@mail.ev1.net>@ENRON
>> >> [mailto:IMCEANOTES-
>> +22siva66+22+20+3Csiva66+40mail+2Eev1+2Enet+3E+40EN
>> >> RON@ENRON.com]
>> >> Sent:	Wednesday, September 19, 2001 2:07 PM
>> >> To:	Quigley, Dutch
>> >> Subject:	Re: UH ticket
>> >>
>> >> is it with our seats?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ---------- Original Message ---------------------------------
-
>> >> From: "Quigley, Dutch" <Dutch.Quigley@ENRON.com>
>> >> Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 13:56:13 -0500
>> >>
>> >> >You can use the extra ticket that i bought for the UT vs UH
>> game
>> >> >
>> >> >dq
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>>
>******************************************************************
>> >> ****
>> >> >This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its
relevant
>> >> affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged
material
>> for
>> >> the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use,
>> >> distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited.
If
>> >> you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive
for
>> >> the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron
>> Corp.
>> >> at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
>> copies
>> >> of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are
not
>> >> intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create
or
>> >> evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron
Corp.
>> >> (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any
>> other
>> >> party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a
>> >> contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
>> >>
>>
>******************************************************************
>> >> ****
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
________________________________________________________________
>> >> Sent via the EV1 webmail system at mail.ev1.net
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
>> ________________________________________________________________
>> Sent via the EV1 webmail system at mail.ev1.net
>>
>>
>>
>>
>

________________________________________________________________
Sent via the EV1 webmail system at mail.ev1.net


Thank you, but I cannot attend.

	"Ingram, Kay" <KIngram@lockeliddell.com>
	05/18/2000 11:44 AM
	Please respond to "Ingram, Kay"

		 To: "'mark.e.haedicke@enron.com'" <mark.e.haedicke@enron.com>,
"'lance.schuler-legal@enron.com'" <lance.schuler-legal@enron.com>,
"'bob.carter@enron.com'" <bob.carter@enron.com>, "'alan.aronowitz@enron.com'"
<alan.aronowitz@enron.com>, "'peter.del.vecchio@enron.com'"
<peter.del.vecchio@enron.com>, "'james.grace@enron.com'"
<james.grace@enron.com>, "'chris.gaffney@enron.com'"
<chris.gaffney@enron.com>, "'barbara.gray@enron.com'"
<barbara.gray@enron.com>, "'travis.mccullough@enron.com'"
<travis.mccullough@enron.com>, "'sheila.tweed@enron.com'"
<sheila.tweed@enron.com>, "'julia.murray@enron.com'"
<julia.murray@enron.com>, "'shonnie.daniel@enron.com'"
<shonnie.daniel@enron.com>, "'richard.b.sanders@enron.com'"
<richard.b.sanders@enron.com>, "'teresa.g.bushman@enron.com'"
<teresa.g.bushman@enron.com>, "'mark.taylor@enron.com'"
<mark.taylor@enron.com>, "'stuart.zisman@enron.com'"
<stuart.zisman@enron.com>, "'anne.c.koehler@enron.com'"
<anne.c.koehler@enron.com>, "'jeff.hodge@enron.com'" <jeff.hodge@enron.com>
		 cc: "Swanstrom, Bill" <BSwanstrom@lockeliddell.com>
		 Subject: Invitation to Astros Game--From Bill Swanstrom

  <http://www.allfreeclipart.com/sports/base3.jpg>

Locke Liddell & Sapp has reserved a suite for the Astros game on Wednesday,
June 7 (against the Minnesota Twins) at 7:05 p.m.

We would love to have you as our guest at Enron Field. We hope you can make
it-it should be a great time! Please RSVP at your earliest convenience to my
assistant, Kay Ingram. You can reach her either by e-mail
(kingram@lockeliddell.com) or by calling her at (713) 226-1317.


Following Friday's meeting, Paula and I discussed the following action plan:

1. Bob Butts will review the accounting implications of changing the SIC Code
to 6211 and will supply a breakdown of revenues by segment to re-look at the
SIC Code classification by Tuesday, March 6th.

2. Chris Dowd at CIC (our proxy solicitor) will work with Paula to gather the
necessary information in order for CIC to present us with the probability of
shareholder approval with a "For" vote and with an   "Against" vote from
ISS.  He hopes to have this completed by Friday, March 9th.

3. Re-review the appropriate SIC Code and the next steps as it relates to
contacting the SEC.

4. Once steps 1, 2 and 3 are completed, determine the number of shares to be
requested via the final proxy.  Final Draft of the proxy will be circulated
on March 12th and will be filed with the   SEC on March 20th.

A document summarizing the Pros/Cons of keeping SIC Code 6211 is forthcoming
once Paula has reviewed.

As always, if you have any questions please give me a call.

Mary


Mark - Does this have any budget implications?  We have an automatic
allocation to EBS in the 2001 budget which I'll assume remains the same
unless you tell me otherwise.

	Mark Schroeder@ECT
	01/05/01 06:42 AM

		 To: Lilian Low/SIN/ECT@ECT, Michelle Hargrave/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Kristina Mordaunt/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Elizabeth Linnell/NA/Enron@Enron, Jim
Fallon/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Roger Estrada/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Anthony Duenner/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Jan Haizmann/LON/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Termination of David Merrill

David responded to my e-mail today, asking him to call me on Monday.  He
suspected bad news.  I told him he was terminated.  He is expecting to meet
Lilian on Monday, with her providing the paperwork.  I have told him, per my
conversation with Lilian, that he should direct questions regarding COBRA,
etc., to Michelle in Houston, as Lilian eschewed familiarity with some of
these nuances of US employment law.  We had a 30 minute conversation, he had
lots of question, I have taken copious notes in the event of any subsequent
legal issue arising (I do not expect any based on my conversation).  He was
quite surprised/shocked.  He asked about work in train.  I asked him to do a
list on Monday of projects in motion, with a list of contacts, e.g., law
firms/consultants, which he will do (Lilian - not sure what usual practice
is, but David wants to leave on a positive note, so he wants to leave his
work in progress in good shape; therefore, please accommodate him so that he
may at least complete these tasks on Monday, i.e., do not show him the door
at 10 a.m., thanks).  I said I would have to get out there to pick it up,
without mentioning that Kristina and I have discussed plans to meet in
Singapore very soon to resolve staffing/resourcing to support EBS Asia.
Please let me know if you need more or have any questions.

Lilian - please arrange for the Singapore switchboard, as of Tuesday a.m., to
indicate that David is no longer at Enron, and to redirect any business calls
to David, to Jan Haizmann or to me, as we will cover the regulatory
requirements until a replacement is found.  Jan's number is 44-207-783-4474,
you have my number.  The time zone difference is unfortunate, but this will
have to suffice for now, and in this way Jan and I can attempt to get our
hands around any issues hanging out there with regulators or consultants.
thanks  mcs


Enron CEO Steve Cooper's voicemail transcripts are now available on the Enron intranet at:  http://home.enron.com/updates/ including his Friday, February 22, 2002 voicemail.

In case you have missed a previous message, the transcripts for his voicemails on January 29, February 8, and February 14 are included, as well.