Current Notes User:

REASONS FOR USING OUTLOOK WEB ACCESS (OWA)

1. Once your mailbox has been migrated from Notes to Outlook, the Outlook client will be configured on your computer.
After migration of your mailbox, you will not be able to send or recieve mail via Notes, and you will not be able to start using Outlook until it is configured by the Outlook Migration team the morning after your mailbox is migrated.  During this period, you can use Outlook Web Access (OWA) via your web browser (Internet Explorer 5.0) to read and send mail.

PLEASE NOTE:  Your calendar entries, personal address book, journals, and To-Do entries imported from Notes will not be available until the Outlook client is configured on your desktop.

2. Remote access to your mailbox.
After your Outlook client is configured, you can use Outlook Web Access (OWA) for remote access to your mailbox.

PLEASE NOTE:  At this time, the OWA client is only accessible while connecting to the Enron network (LAN).  There are future plans to make OWA available from your home or when traveling abroad.

HOW TO ACCESS OUTLOOK WEB ACCESS (OWA)

Launch Internet Explorer 5.0, and in the address window type:  http://nahou-msowa01p/exchange/john.doe

Substitute "john.doe" with your first and last name, then click ENTER.  You will be prompted with a sign in box as shown below.  Type in "corp/your user id" for the user name and your NT password to logon to OWA and click OK.  You will now be able to view your mailbox.

PLEASE NOTE:  There are some subtle differences in the functionality between the Outlook and OWA clients.  You will not be able to do many of the things in OWA that you can do in Outlook.  Below is a brief list of *some* of the functions NOT available via OWA:

Features NOT available using OWA:

-  Tasks
-  Journal
-  Spell Checker
-  Offline Use
-  Printing Templates
-  Reminders
-  Timed Delivery
-  Expiration
-  Outlook Rules
-  Voting, Message Flags and Message Recall
-  Sharing Contacts with others
-  Task Delegation
-  Direct Resource Booking
-  Personal Distribution Lists

QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS?

If you have questions or concerns using the OWA client, please contact the Outlook 2000 question and answer Mailbox at:

	Outlook.2000@enron.com

Otherwise, you may contact the Resolution Center at:

	713-853-1411

Thank you,

Outlook 2000 Migration Team


----- Forwarded by Miyung Buster/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 09/29/2000 03:12 PM
-----

	djcustomclips@djinteractive.com
	09/26/2000 02:00 PM
	Please respond to nobody

		 To: 86464@WCTOPICS.djnr.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Utilities, Electric: Deregulation: SoCal Ed To Consider Litigation
To Recover Power Costs

[IMAGE]
SoCal Ed To Consider Litigation To Recover Power Costs
?
09/26/2000
Dow Jones Energy Service
(Copyright (c) 2000, Dow Jones&Company, Inc.)

LOS ANGELES -(Dow Jones)- Southern California Edison said if the state's
Public Utilities Commission doesn't allow the utility to recover about $2
billion in unpaid power costs when a state imposed rate freeze is lifted it
will consider litigation to ensure recovery of electricity costs, according
to a filing made late Monday with the Security and Exchange Commission.

"The CPUC has denied requests by (Southern California Edison) and other
California utility companies to allow recovery of the transition revenue
account undercollections after the end of the statutory rate freeze," the SEC
filing states. "These decisions pre-dated the unforseen run-up in wholesale
market prices beyond the level of prices that should have been produced by
functioning competitive markets."

SoCal Edison consumers are currently paying a fixed rate for electricity as
required by the state's landmark 1996 deregulation law, which is far below
the 20 cent/KWh wholesale rate SoCal Edison pays to procure the power from
energy producers. As a result, the company's debt is growing by several
million dollars a day.

If the company is unable to recoup the money from its ratepayers,
shareholders would be responsible for the costs, said SoCal Edison chief
financial officer John Scilacci.

The company would go to court seeking authority to have its customers pay
back the debt, if required, rather than hold its shareholders liable,
Scilacci said.

SoCal Edison said in the SEC filing that it has used "virtually all of its
CPUC-authorized capacity for short-term borrowing."

The utility is restructuring its loan arrangements to allow for additional
"short-term borrowing capacity to meet its liquidity needs."

The utility has recently received a negative rating from several Wall Street
debt rating agencies.

   -By Jason Leopold; Dow Jones Newswires;
323-658-3874;jason.leopold@dowjones.com

Folder Name: Utilities, Electric: Deregulation
Relevance Score on Scale of 100: 95

______________________________________________________________________
To review or revise your folder, visit Dow Jones CustomClipsor contact Dow
Jones Customer  Service by e-mail at custom.news@bis.dowjones.comor by phone
at 800-369-7466. (Outside the U.S. and  Canada, call 609-452-1511 or contact
your local sales representative.)
______________________________________________________________________
Copyright (c) 2000 Dow Jones &Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved


no problem.


Please review the attached Links Report. (Please note that the Hugoton team is still working on the final scope of work that will take place during their ESD (5/7/02). The original time frame was 2 days, and then changed to just 4 to 6 hours with another outage planned later in the summer. We don't want to have two separate outages, so they are trying to put together a plan for 1 long day.  I'll keep you posted.

FYI,
Some of the planned overhauls for this summer may be approved in the next day or too.

Jerry Graves
713-345-8923


March 31, 2001 is my last day at Enron.  My years at Enron has been a very
exciting and challenging period in my life.  Nevertheless, I,m very excited
to be moving on to new things as well.  I shall miss many of the good people
there that I have had the honor to work with.  As of the beginning of April
my Enron address will be invalid, please contact me using the below added
means.

Tom Delaney
1929 E. Seminole Dr.
Phoenix, Arizona 85022
TomDelaneyAZ@aol.com
         602-321-5017


Thanks a bunch.  I know this is frustrating for you and I will send the list
of contracts to you so the real time people can get their act together.

   Kate Symes                01/31/2001 05:18 PM

To: Rhonda L Denton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Energy Services, Inc.

No, this was incorrect. I'll tell you something - Real Time is having
problems figuring out who they do and do not trade with. We're going to have
a conversation about this in a minute when I come up for air from this whole
California mess. In the meantime, I've changed this to Enron Energy Services,
Inc.

Thanks,
Kate

Rhonda L Denton
01/31/2001 11:32 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Energy Services, Inc.

509402.  Can you see if this is the correct CP.  We don't have a contract
with them.  If it is correct, that's fine, just let me know.


Please respond if you have any issues to address to National Fuel.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jaquet, Tammy
Sent: Friday, October 12, 2001 12:08 PM
To: Lamadrid, Victor; Greif, Donna
Subject: FW: NFGDC Fall 2001 Supplier/Marketer Meeting

-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Smielecki [mailto:SmieleckiR@NATFUEL.COM]
Sent: Friday, October 12, 2001 7:54 AM
To: mdriscol@enron.com; pleanza@enron.com; Jaquet, Tammy
Subject: Re: NFGDC Fall 2001 Supplier/Marketer Meeting

will be off 10/12 & 10/15

>>> mundyp 10/12/01 08:53 >>>

Dear NY or PA Gas Supplier/Marketer:

The Transportation Services Dept. of NFGDC will be hosting its Fall Supplier Meeting in early November of 2001.  Your input regarding preferred date, agenda, and topics would be most appreciated.

Please provide your suggestions, comments to my attention.  Thanks for your help.

Regards,
Paul

Paul Mundy (mundyp@natfuel.com)
Transportation Services Dept.
National Fuel Gas Distribution Corporation
Help Desk Line: (716) 857-7232


De nada.

From: Carlos Sole@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 11/10/2000 09:25 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Opportunities at ENA

Thanks for your help.


Please review.


As a reminder, paralegals should distribute guaranties as stated:

Incoming Guaranties:  Original to Leslie Campbell at EB2866, copies to file
and Anthony Campos.
Outgoing Guaranties:  Original to Counterparty, copies to Leslie Campbell,
file, and Anthony Campos.

All original distributions should be by hand delivery (internal) and courier
(external).

Thank you.

Cordially,
Mary Cook
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith, 38th Floor, Legal
Houston, Texas   77002-7361
(713) 345-7732 (phone)
(713) 646-3490 (fax)
mary.cook@enron.com


Teco Tap       60.000 / Enron ; 65.000 / HPL IFERC

LS HPL LSK IC       15.000 / HPL IFERC


Thanks for the info.  Congratz on the deal.


Sam,

I forgot about Maureen's article being available. Please, use your judgement
what to publish.
It  depends on whom you can catch first.

Vince

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  William Smith @ ENRON                           10/02/2000 08:48 AM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Research Intelligence

Vince,

I'll try to contact her this morning.  Also, Zimin's note with his article
said you want to print his Technical Corner today.  Do we not want to
conclude Maureen's article with today's issue?

Sam

Vince J Kaminski@ECT
09/29/2000 05:22 PM
To: wsmith2@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Research Intelligence

Sam,

We should profile Kirstee who is on rotation from London Office.

Vince


I don't think I did check this one.  Nothing with or pertaining to New World
Network however.

Kay C. Young
Legal Specialist
Enron North America Corp.
713-853-6794 Phone
713-646-3393 Fax
kay.young@enron.com

	Tana Jones
	03/23/2001 05:07 PM

		 To: Kay Young/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: New World Network USA, Inc.

I don't know if Mark Greenberg ran this one by you or not, we are already
preparing it for signature, but can you check on this counterparty for NDAs.
Much thanks!


can you have your dealbench contact call jeff dasovich in sf 415-782-7822

Chris Calger
503-464-3735


Per Steven Kelly
 - LatestDeal.doc


Attached is a draft of the Master Agreement you requested for Matrix Oil &
Gas.
Please let me know if I can be of further assistance.

DP


Bill,

As per our conversation today, I am sending you an outline of what we intend to be doing in Ercot and in particular on the real-time desk. For 2002 Ercot is split into 4 zones with TCRs between 3 of the zones. The zones are fairly diverse from a supply/demand perspective. Ercot has an average load of 38,000 MW, a peak of 57,000 MW with a breakdown of 30% industrial, 30% commercial and 40% residential. There are already several successful aggregators that are looking to pass on their wholesale risk to a credit-worthy QSE (Qualified Scheduling Entity).

Our expectation is that we will be a fully qualified QSE by mid-March with the APX covering us up to that point. Our initial on-line products will include a bal day and next day financial product. (There is no day ahead settlement in this market). There are more than 10 industrial loads with greater than 150 MW concentrated at single meters offering good opportunities for real-time optimization. Our intent is to secure one of these within the next 2 months.

I have included some price history to show the hourly volatility and a business plan to show the scope of the opportunity. In addition, we have very solid analytics that use power flow simulations to map out expected outcomes in the real-time market.

The initial job opportunity will involve an analysis of the real-time market as it stands today with a view to trading around our information. This will also drive which specific assets we approach to manage. As we are loosely combining our Texas gas and Ercot power desks our information flow will be superior and I believe we will have all the tools needed for a successful real-time operation.

Let me know if you have any further questions.

Thanks,

Doug


Peter/Kay,

Attached is revised ESA Facility Agreement.  This includes the Optional
Electric Output Guarantee for the Brazil site conditions.  Since the spread
between the 8 unit average guarantee and the single unit is greater than in
the base contract the LD sample calc needed some work, which I took care of.

Kay/Kent,

I also took a swipe at the 17.4 Termination language rework. See if I what I
came up with works...if so, we can use on all other Facility Agreements.

I've added John Ayres to distribution.  John and I will be reviewing the
contract Monday AM at 8:30 in his office.  Kay, it would be good if you
could join us ...as we're in the home stretch.  Also, can you send Peter the
remaining Exhibits he requested (B-1 and H-2).

thanks,

Lee

-----Original Message-----
From: Thompson, Peter J. [mailto:peterthompson@akllp.com]
Sent: Friday, December 08, 2000 10:22 AM
To: Kay Mann (E-mail)
Cc: Lee. Johnson (E-mail); Kent. Shoemaker (E-mail); Cheryl. Lipshutz
(E-mail); Roseann Engeldorf (E-mail); Brett. R. Wiggs (E-mail); Ben.
Jacoby (E-mail); Pipitone, Paul; Taylor, Rob; Cobb, Chris
Subject: Enron South America Break-Out Agreement

    Attached please find a clean and blackline of the latest draft of
the Enron South America Break-Out Agreement.  The only changes made to
this version is the addition of today's date and the 72/25 split of
Change Order 3 in Section 6.2.  We are still missing the Agreement
Reference in section 6.7.1.  We haven't made any changes to the exhibits
since the last time they were circulated.  I will pull them out of our
Houston database and circulate them shortly.
 <<Enron South America Turbine Agreement (version 4 to 5).DOC>>  <<ESA
Break-out Agreement Draft of 12/8/00.DOC>>

 - Enron South America Turbine Agreement (version 4 to 5)_GEredline120900.DOC


Thanks, Vince.  I will get moving on it right away.

Molly

Vince J Kaminski
02/21/2001 05:55 PM
To: Molly Magee/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: A resume for John Lavorato

Molly,

Please, make arrangements for the interview with this candidate for
a  trading position. Interviews with John Lavorato, Jeff Shankman,
Gary Hickerson, Stinson Gibner.

I talked to him in New York and he is considering
other opportunities, so we have to act fast.
I think John will like him more than Punit.

Thanks


Tom,

Here are the new graphs with totals (bar charts) and distributions (boxplots)
for all seven sites through May 2002.

I believe that I have come up with a method of providing you with the
ESTIMATED energy lost. Since it requires using two data sets (faults and
10-minute data) it will be take a bit longer to run. However I hope to have
that result to you next week.

Mark


Attached please find the most recent version of the CA Development II
Agreement and Exhibits as well as a blackline against the version
circulated on December 4.  I will be forwarding to Kay Mann the
execution copy that will incorporate both the agreement and exhibits
into one document, which will also include Exhibit H-2.
<<CA Development Energy II Comparison of v. 3 to 5.DOC>>  <<CA
Development II Comparison of v1 to current.DOC>>  <<Exhibits for CA
Development II Agreement CISO2 Execution Copy.DOC>>  <<break out
agreement--CIS02 (12/20/00).DOC>>
 - CA Development Energy II Comparison of v. 3 to 5.DOC
 - CA Development II Comparison of v1 to current.DOC
 - Exhibits for CA Development II Agreement CISO2 Execution Copy.DOC
 - 00).DOC


It's more talent than I can remember.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2001 12:11 PM
To: Nancy.Sellers@RobertMondavi.com; eldon@interx.net
Subject:

Thanks again for a truly fun New Year's.  I had a great time, and it was
fun spending it with you two.  When I think of all that talent, together in
one house---astounding!  Really fun.  Thanks.


Vince: forwarding this to you as an FYI - do you suppose you should sit in
since you've already met Victor? Just a thought ...
Regards,
Amy
---------------------- Forwarded by Amy Oberg/HOU/EES on 08/09/2000 10:31 AM
---------------------------

Richard Causey@ENRON
08/09/2000 10:30 AM
To: Amy Oberg/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Re: Conversation w/ Andersen

I am in the process of setting up a conference call with my contact here as
well as Victor Burke.  Prelimainary indications are they have not finalized
their objectives yet but I will discuss that further with them.  I would
still strongly suggest rescheduling until everyone can attend and we can
fully discuss our involvement.

To: Richard Causey/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Conversation w/ Andersen

Rick:
Quick follow up - any response yet from your contacts at Andersen? We are
holding off cancelling the Thurs meeting w/ hope they will get back to you by
EOB Wednesday.
Pls let me know what the status is.
Thanks and regards,
Amy Oberg

Richard Causey@ENRON
08/07/2000 09:07 AM
To: Amy Oberg/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Re: MIT/AA New Value Research Lab

I have discussed with AA and they are following up.  If I am the agenda, I
would cancel the meeting and when I hear from AA, I will e mail everyone.  I
would suggest we not hold a meeting until Kean, Buy , Koenig and I can all
come so that we can truly move forward (or decide not to).  Let me know what
you decide.  Thanks.  Rick

To: Richard Causey/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: MIT/AA New Value Research Lab

Rick: just wanted to highlight that you ARE the agenda for this meeting (see
initial notice, agenda). Let me know if there's anything I can do for you.
Amy

---------------------- Forwarded by Amy Oberg/HOU/EES on 08/07/2000 08:19 AM
---------------------------

	Enron Energy Services

	From:  Carol Moffett                           08/03/2000 04:21 PM
	Phone No: 713-853-6658 Phone
  888-782-3518 Pager
  EB 613b

To: Richard Causey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Marie Hejka/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven J
Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Amy Oberg/HOU/EES@EES, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark
Ruane/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rick Buy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Koenig/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Sharron Westbrook/Corp/Enron@Enron, Christie Connell/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Maureen McVicker/HOU/EES@EES, Laura Gutierrez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shirley
Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen K Heathman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joannie
Williamson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: MEETING CONFIRMED:  MIT/AA New Value Research Lab

This will confirm the meeting requested below.  Please note, all invitees are
not available, but the confirmed meeting time is the best time for most of
the invitees.

 Date: Thursday - August 10
 Time: 11:00a to noon
 Place: Conference Room 4741
 Confirmed Attendees: Rick Causey
  Marie Hejka
  Steve Kean
  Amy Oberg
  Mark Palmer
  Mark Ruane

Thanks for your help, everyone.

---------------------- Forwarded by Carol Moffett/HOU/EES on 08/03/2000 04:03
PM ---------------------------

	Enron Energy Services

	From:  Carol Moffett                           08/02/2000 03:44 PM
	Phone No: 713-853-6658 Phone
  888-782-3518 Pager
  EB 613b

To: Ginger Dernehl/HOU/EES@EES, Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen K
Heathman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sharron Westbrook/Corp/Enron@Enron, Laura
Gutierrez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laura Valencia/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Patty
Pennington/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
cc: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rick
Buy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Causey/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mark Ruane/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mark Koenig/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Amy
Oberg/HOU/EES@EES, Marie Hejka/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: MEETING REQUEST:  MIT/AA New Value Research Lab

Good afternoon.  I am assisting Amy Oberg with setting up a meeting among the
individuals listed below.  Would you be so kind as to review their calendars
and let me know if they are available during any of the suggested meeting
times.

Meeting Topic:  MIT/AA New Value Research Lab
Meeting Purpose:  Follow up to discussion from 8/1/00; Rick Causey to brief
group on
conversations w/ AA regarding "where they intend to go with this effort".
Attendees: Steve Kean
 Vince Kaminski
 Rick Buy
 Rick Causey
 Mark Ruane
 Mark Koenig
 Mark Palmer
 Amy Oberg
 Marie Hejka

Suggested Meeting Dates and Times:
Thursday - August 10 anytime between 8:00a and 10:00a
Thursday - August 10 11:00 to noon
Friday - August 11   anytime between 8:00a and 9:30a
Friday - August 11 1:00p to 2:00p

Thank you.


What's the scoop golf-pro?  Are you in for tonight?  FYI:  The weather is gorgeous outside.


----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 01/18/2001 01:11 PM -----

	David Merrill@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	01/10/2001 11:55 PM

		 To: Mark Schroeder@ECT, Anthony Duenner@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
		 cc: Craig Clark@Enron Communications, Jane
Wilson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jan Haizmann@ECT, Michael
Grimes/AP/Enron@Enron, <donald_lassere@enron.net>, <xi_xi@enron.net>, Justin
Cornett@ENRON, <roger_estrada@enron.net>, Leroy Ho@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS,
Kenneth Wang@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS, Tom Wei@Enron Communications, Wayne
Gardner/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, James Ginty@Enron
Communications, Kristina Mordaunt@Enron Communications, Robbi Rossi@EES,
Marie Heard@Enron Communications, Stephen D Burns/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sue
Nord@Enron, Richard Shapiro@Enron, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Don
Hawkins/OTS/Enron@Enron, Scott Yeager@Enron Communications, Amr
Ibrahim/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mike
Dahlke/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Carmen
Perez/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Elizabeth Linnell/NA/Enron@Enron,
Ginger Dernehl@EES, <laura.lannarone@enron.com>, Lindsay
Meade/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Miyung
Buster/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 Subject: Final Status Report of EBS East Asia Regulatory Matters

 As many of you know, I am going to be leaving Enron to pursue new
opportunities.
  I am leaving with regret,  as I have enjoyed working with all of you, and I
believe EBS
  is poised for great success in Asia.   To assist in a smooth transition,  I
have prepared
  this report on  the status of all EBS East Asia regulatory affairs actions
I am working on,
  and my thoughts about next steps.    A list of key contacts is also
provided.    Mark
  Schroeder will reassign pending actions.

   Again, many, many thanks for your support and encouragement and for what I
have
   learned about broadband and EBS from each of you.

1.   Singapore

 (a)  SBO License Application:

        The application was completed in draft in December.   Dan Arzola of
EBS Asia
        has a copy in Houston.   We cannot proceed further on the application
until we
        decide what  legal entity to use.   We have a legal entity (Enron
Broadband
        Services Pte Ltd) set up that encompasses all EBS activities
including bandwidth t
        trading.

        The legal entity that we use in the application will have to pay a 1%
annual gross
        turnover fee unless we get it waived by the regulator on the grounds
that the
        turnover fee was never intended to capture bandwidth trading
revenue.   This
        is a possible option in my opinion as the regulator (IDA) does not
want to be working at cross
        purposes with other parts of the government that wish to provide EBS
with incentives.
        See below.

    (b)  Legal Due Diligence:

        However, before pursuing a waiver from IDA,  we were planning to
complete legal due
        diligence to examine any options for avoiding the fee without a
waiver.
        Donald is of the view (see his Jan 9 e-mail ) that bandwidth trading
has to be
        licensed by the regulator.  ( In Europe, bandwidth trading usually
does not
        require telecom licensing.)   If Donald is correct as he probably is,
there may be
        less need of further legal research  on that point unless perhaps to
confirm absolutely
        that there is no way to shield EBS bandwidth trading from the
turnover fee apart from
        a waiver or reduction of the fee.    For example it is possible  that
Jan Haizmann
        or others may figure out a way to have actual trades escape the fee
(done offshore
        for example).   Jan I believe has some ideas on this that he adanced
in the context
        of Korea.

        I believe it would still be prudent  to proceed as we had planned to
engage
        a law firm here in Singapore (as we have in Hong Kong and Japan) for
the purpose
        of guiding us through these sorts of questions (or at least
confirming our reading)
        and answering the many other questions posed in a matrix developed by
a working
        group headed by Wayne Gardner.   We will likely be needing the firm
anyway at
        some point.

        I have prepared a list of seven law firms engaged in telecoms
practice in Singapore.
        EBS General Counsel is planning to examine its Asia strategy and whom
to send and
        when to engage a firm to complete Wayne's questionnaire and for other
purposes.

         My advice is, after the due diligence is completed or we have at
least confirmed
         that bandwidth trading is required to be in the licensed entity,
probably to go to the IDA and
         discuss the implications of the fee for us.   The contacts I would
suggest discussing this
         with are Andy Haire and Fiona Yeo (see contact list).]      IDA does
not wish to prevent
         EBS's coming to Singapore, and the fee was of course set up without
bandwidth trading
         specifically in mind as a revenue source.   Bandwidth trading was
referenced in the
         Code only later as a result of Enron's comment letters.

  (c)  Arthur D Little consultant proposal to support EBS Pioneer Status
Application

         This 75k proposal is now with us in final form, after undergoing
changes by me
         and two by our Houston tax lawyers.   I was to have gone to ADL
Singapore next
         for a meeting to question them on how much of this they are able to
         do independently without reliance on us.   This was a suggestion
made by
         Jim Ginty of EBS tax to make sure they would not be reprocessing our
info,
         I also intended to get them to pinpoint which of the products would
be quantified,
         rather than a "where appropriate."     Assuming we proceed with this
proposal,
         someone else will need to do this conversation with ADL Singapore.

         I have forwarded the final proposal to Wayne Garder and Mark and
most other
         interested parties earlier this week.

        NB:   Someone needs to be appointed to contact Simon MacCormac at ADL
and explain
        at least our timing and process for getting back to him, as a
courtesy.   I have not
        replied to his final submission as of now.   See contact info at end
of e-mail.

         For background,  the reason I believe EBS needs this work and sought
a consultant
         proposal is that Pioneer Status is typically awarded  to companies
that make major
         dollar, infrastructure, and job-creation expenditures in
Singapore.   Our business
         model does just the opposite.   So, to be awarded Pioneer Status,
which the EDB is
         very willing to consider us for after many months of persuasion,  I
believe we need to
         help EDB demonstrate what the quantitative spin-off benefits are for
Singapore from our
         developing bandwidth trading here (e.g. increased efficiencies of
capacity utilization,
         effect of lower bandwidth prices on attracting investment).   This
is a job for a  development
         economist teamed with someone who knows about bandwidth trading.
To my mind,
         if ADL cannot produce the bandwidth trading specialist we want, it
might be worth it
         to have one of our experts assigned to liaise with  them, and adjust
the contract
         accordingly to reflect what part we are providing.

         One thing the ADL scope of work does not provide for is the actual
completion of
         the Pioneer Status Application - only the supporting economic
analysis.  That is because it is
         proper for us to be the ones outlining our business plan for
Singapore, rather than
         running that information through ADL and charging its overhead.  The
idea is to get
         ADL to perform the quantitative economic development analysis we
cannot do in-house.

    (d)   Direct contact with EDB on EBS's plans

         EDB (Chelsia Lim ) has this week asked EBS to update her on its
business
         plans for Singapore.    I have made sure Craig Clark will take the
responsibility
         for seeing this is handled.   While a courtesy call is fine, I would
advise
         not to brief her formally until EBS has really decided what our
plans are,
         with staffing, etc.   They have been asking for our plans for a
while, and
         are waiting for some specifics when we have them.

2.    Hong Kong

        We have  2 licenses:   IVANS (value added services) and ETS (external
        telecoms services (includes bandwidth trading).

        There are several documents in draft and clearance which need to be
filed
        under these licenses before we are able to operate in Hong Kong.
        The principal ones are (a)  the system configuration plan,   (b) the
tariff for
        sale and trading of circuits under the ETS license (c) the tariff for
Mediacast
        services under the IVANS license, and (later) (d) a tariff for
VOD/EOD to
        be filed under the IVANS license.

        (a)  status of system configuration plan:

        The plan is done in draft and is being held pending a decision to be
         communicated by Roger Estrada within the next week or two as to
whether
         the Lucent 10G equipment described in the plan will be changed to
other
         equipment.    The HK lawyers  (Michelle Chan of Clifford Chance)
have said
         that if we plan to provide other equipment at the outset, we ought
to just
         wait and send in the correct description rather than revise.   If we
do stick with
         the Lucent equipment , we will also need to revise our orginal
license
         application as well (says Michelle Chan)  to include description of
related
         Cisco equipment that was not mentioned in our orginal license
application.

         When the system configuration plan is done in final, we also need to
         change the listed destination in the diagram from "San Jose"  to
"West Coast
         USA,  Japan, Singapore, and Australia".

         There are two copies of the present draft submission typed on the
OFTA forms.
          I have given one to Craig Clark of EBS to carry back to Houston.
The other
         copy is with Annie Ng in our Singapore office.

         When we know what equipment we are going to be using, Tom Wei needs
to
         revise the diagram and also make the changes in destination referred
to above.
         Other small edits need to be made in Appendix A (see Dec 28 e-mail
referenced
         below).   My successor should review the whole package once more
with Michelle
         Chan in final.    Then the final package needs to be cleared by
Anthony Duenner
         and our EBS lawyers before going to Ken Rice or another qualified
Director of
         our Hong Kong company for signature.   After that it goes back to
Michelle Chan
         for filing with OFTA.

         NB:   See Michelle Chan's e-mail of Dec 28, being repeated
separately, for
                  further information.

       (b)   Tariffs for BWTrading under ETS License

        In December in Houston I worked with Bill White and his staff on a
tariff plan for
        bandwidth trading in HK.   Based on a meeting I had with the
regulator in Hong
        Kong,   we agreed to file pro forma ceiling prices rather than an
entirely new
        and variable system which the regulator insisted we not do.
Ceiling  prices
        were developed and submitted to Michelle Chan for review.

        Along with the prices we are required to submit our Terms and
Conditions.   For
        that I used EBS General Terms and Conditions (GTC's) for trading
obtained from
        Robbi Rossi and Michelle Heard.  Mike Grimes  has a set as well.

        Present status:  Right now a dialogue is under way between Michelle
Chan and
        Robbi Rossi as to whether it is sufficient to file the GTC's alone or
whether
        certain exhibits, service level agreements, and confirmations
referred to in
        the GTC's must also be filed.   There are other questions being
discussed in
        that channel  such as how to handle variations in the terms based on
        commercial dynamics.     All these e-mails will be  forwarded.   Once
these
        issues related to the GTCs are resolved, the tariff for bandwidth
trading should
        be filed, going through Michelle Chan.

        NB:  See Michelle Chan e-mail of 1/09/01 which being forwarded
separately.

     (c)  Tariff for Media Cast under IVANS license:

       I worked with Leroy Ho and Ken Wang in December and we submitted the
main
       part of the Media Cast tariff to Michelle Chan.   However, we still
need to get the
       Terms and Conditions for Media Cast from Robbi Rossi or Michelle Heard
and
       attach them to the tariff diagrams and submit them to Michelle Chan.

       NB:   See my e-mail to Michelle Chan of Dec 21 which being repeated.
       Someone needs to work with EBS legal to get the T and C's for Media
Cast to Michelle
       or to set up direct channel between EBS legal and Michelle Chan as in
       the case of the exchanges on the T and C's for Bandwidth trading
referred
       to above.

      (d)   Overall change of responsibility for EBS Regulatory HK

        Michael,  or whomever will be taking over these responsibilities,
should
        get from Michelle Chan of Clifford Chance Hong Kong a fresh copy of
        Alison Lindsay's letter to Xi Xi of October 2000 stating that we
received
        our licenses and setting forth in detail all of the requirements.
This is the
        master document ("bible") on compliance under our licenses and will
catch any
        detail not included above.   For example:

            - my successor should also file a new form with OFTA,  the Hong
Kong
              regulator (form is included in the attachments to the letter)
naming
              himself the point of contact, replacing me.    Michelle Chan
can forward
              the letter to the regulator.

           -  we will need to be selecting an independent auditor to certify
certain routine
              reports we may need to file in future.   I have not started on
that.

3.    Korea

       Robbi Rossi needs to call Kim and Chang (law firm we use in Korea)
       to authorize them to research and provide advice to us on how to
handle
       the apparent regulatory impediment to Bandwidth Trading in Korea that
       we identified during my November trip.

       Once Kim and Chang starts work on this, someone from regulatory should
       be made available to help guide Kim and Chang on our regulatory
       questions, in coordination with Robbi Rossi.

       The key e-mails are (a) one from me outlining the overall problem and
        some suggestions for dealing with it ;  (b) one from Jan Haizmann
with
        some additional and in some cases alternative suggestions on how
        to deal with it,  (c)  two from Jae Moo Lee in Korea with additional
        points of view.  These will be forwarded.

  4.   Japan

       Our regulatory consultant is Art Yanagawa.   Contact info below.  Mike
Grimes
       and I have been in meetings with him and  Mike is fully briefed to
carry on the
       on-the-ground  part of contacts with Art.   Art also responds to
Donald and
       Roger Estrada and relies on them for guidance and input.

      At some point it should be thought through who should be the point
person
      to manage  this contract and approve payments, or decide to leave things
      as they are with approvals done in Houston.    The present system works
but
      it is not clear to me who is responsible for what.

      Art has prepared the amendment to our Special Type 2  license to add
      service to other destinations.   The latest status was that he was
holding
      the amendment over the holidays while clarifying some points raised by
      Mike Grimes.    Someone needs to be assigned responsibility for
      getting the amendment through.

      General Concern:

      A more general regulatory concern for us in Japan is that our
consultant
      advises us that we cannot use the term bandwidth trading  in
      communications with the government because it is not something
      contemplated in the Telecom Business Law,  so is prohibited if
      stated as we would state it elsewhere.

      We therefore are having to go through elaborate contortions to make
      what we are planning to do actually look like we are doing something
      else.    I admit that I agree with the approach we are taking for now
and
      can offer nothing better for the immediate term.

      However, I would say that long term we are running some risks.    If we
      are going to make Japan  one of the centerpieces of our  Asia EBS
      strategy,   I think we need to consider devoting more full time EBS
      regulatory resources to Japan exclusively.

       The allocation problem is that whatever regulatory resources we apply
       have to focus on  immediate license amendment  and operational
       questions that drive out time to work effectively on long term
       issues such as how to go about amending the Telecommunications
       Business Law  to allow bandwidth trading explicitly.    This would seem
       important to reduce long term risks to our business strategy.

5.    "Digital Divide"

       I had been giving intermittent support to helping Scott Yeager and
Justin
       Cornett of EBS, and Will Reed of Technology for All, figure out how
       to expand the concept of Technology for All to Asia.    The strategy
       was to utilize some of Japan's $15 billion pledge of funds to support
       digital divide activities in Asia - to support the expansion into Asia
of
       the EBS-supported TFA model.    This work will cease unless it can
       be picked up by Laura Lannarone of corporate social responsbility
       or Steve Burns of the DC office.

6.   KEY CONTACTS for operational items in this memo:

(a)   SBO License:  InfoCom Development Authority of Singapore

        (1)  Ms. Fiona Yeo, Asst Dir Competiton  - 211-1824
        (2)  Mr. Andrew Haire - Senior Director Policy and Regulation -
211-1731
        (3)  Ms Hema Ramnani - Manager- Policy   211-1860
        (4)  Ms Aileen Chia, Deputy Director, Economic Regulation - 211-1883
        (5)  Ms Ng Cher Keng, Director, Policy - 211-1828

(b)  Pioneer Tax Status:  Economic Development Board

       (1)  Chelsia LIM - Senior Officer Infocomms and Media - 832-6676
              <chelsial@edb.gov.sg>
       (2)  Bernard NEE -  Head, Infocomms and Media - 832-6964
       (3)  Sean LOW - Senior Officer Infocomms and Media - 832-6260
              <seanlow@edb.gov.sg>
       (4)   LEE Eng Keat - same as above - 832-6006

(c)  Arthur D Little proposal

        (1)  Simon MacCormac - Associate Director
              297-2300
              <maccormac.simon@adlittle.com>

        (2) Peter J Connell - Vice President
               207-2300
             <connell.peter@adlittle.com>

(d)  Hong Kong License filings:

       (1)  Michelle Chan  852-2825-8888
              <michelle.chan@cliffordchance.com>

       (2)  Alison Lindsay
               <alison.lindsay@cliffordchance.com>

        (3)  OFTA:  M.H. Au
               Senior Asst Director (Regulation)
               852-2961-6688
               <mhau@ofta.gov.hk>

(e)  Japan Telecom regulatory consultant to  EBS:

       Art Yanagawa
       81-3-5418-7056
       <arthur@asianet.co.jp>

David

       for example, the option of whether we can break bandwidth trading
functions
       out of the entity


Dear Mike and Chris:

Thank you for your e-mail.? You criteria is dually noted.? In immediate
response we have several signed pieces available.? I look forward to hearing
from you.

Warm regards,

Virginia Repasky
Christopher-Clark Fine Art
Tel:

They are as follows:

Henry Moore (English 1898-1986)???? $4,900.00
TWO RECLINING FIGURES, 1974
Original etching printed in black ink on cream wove paper.? Signed in pencil
lower right Moore.? A fine impression of the definitive state, numbered in
pencil lower left "10/50," from the edition of 50.? Printed by Lacouriere and
Frelaut, Paris.? Published by Gerald Cramer, Geneva.? In excellent condition,
printed on a full sheet with wide margins.
Catalogue reference: Cramer 205
Image size: 9 1/4 x 7 7/8 inches
(G11771)
[IMAGE]

Henry Moore (English 1898-1986)???? $4,900.00
GIRL DOING HER HOMWORK IV, 1974
Original etching printed in black ink on wove paper.? Signed in pencil lower
right Moore.? A fine impression of the definitive state, numbered in pencil
lower left "19/20," from the edition of 20.? Published by Gerald Cramer,
Geneva and Spencer Co. Ltd. for the Henry Moore Foundation Much, London,
1980.? In excellent condition, printed on a full sheet with wide margins.
Catalogue reference: Cramer 329
Image size: 6 7/8 x 6 9/16 inches
(G11700)
[IMAGE]

Henry Moore (English 1898-1986)???? $4,900.00
SEATED FIGURE WITH ARCHITECTURAL BACKGROUND, 1979
Original etching printed in black ink on wove paper.? Signed in pencil lower
right Moore.? A fine impression of the definitive state, numbered in pencil
lower left "15/50," from the edition of 50.? Printed by Lacouriere and
Frelaut, Paris.?? In excellent condition, printed on a full sheet with wide
margins.
Catalogue reference: Cramer 517
Image size: 7 x 7 inches
(G11699)
[IMAGE]
Henry Moore (English 1898-1986)
MOTHER AND CHILD, 1977
Original lithograph printed in colors on T.H. Saunders paper.? Signed in
pencil lower right Moore.? A fine impression of the definitive state,
numbered in pencil lower left "21/50," from the edition of 50, apart from 15
artist's proofs.? In excellent condition, printed in bright fresh colors on a
full sheet with wide margins.
Catalogue reference: Cramer 431
Image size: 23 x 18 5/8 inches
(G11721)
Photograph upon request
?

[IMAGE]
Georges Rouault (French 1871-1958)??? $9,500.00
AUTOPORTRAIT II, 1926
Original lithograph printed in three colors (black, ochre, red-brown) on wove
paper. Hand signed in pencil lower right Georges Rouault. A beautifully
printed impression of the definitive state (etat d,finitif) in colors from
the edition of 100, numbered "69/100" in pencil lower left. In excellent
condition, with strong, fresh colors, printed on a sheet with full margins.
Catalogue reference: Chapon/Rouault 343
Image size:13 3/8 x 9 5/8 inches
Sheet size: 22 x 16 5/16
(Image shown on our web site www.clarkfineart.com)


no it is nice.  i shouldn't have any problems.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Hal Lenhart" <hlenhart@msn.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Hal+20Lenhart+22+20+3Chlenhart+40msn+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Friday, June 08, 2001 3:16 PM
To:	Lenhart, Matthew
Subject:	Flooding?

How is the rains and flooding down there? Will you have  problem getting out of Houston tomorrow? We will try to give you a call  tonight.

Dad


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 02/06/2001
02:55 PM ---------------------------

David Ikenberry <daveike@rice.edu> on 02/06/2001 01:39:58 PM
To: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
cc: ostdiek@rice.edu
Subject:

Hi Vince,

I just now heard back from Andrew Karolyi.  He will be here on Monday March
12.  Would you be available for dinner either on Sunday March 11 or Monday
March 12?
Thanks, Dave

***********************************
Prof. David Ikenberry
Jones Graduate School of Management
Rice University
713-348-5385


Start Date: 4/26/01; HourAhead hour: 1;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in SC Trades schedule.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042601.txt

---- SC Trades Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblInt_Interchange.
     Details: (Hour: 1 / Preferred: 112.00 / Final: 111.97)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/26/01
  TRADING_SC: PWRX
  PNT_OF_INTRC: SP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 2
  DEAL_NO: 1

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 1 / Preferred:  97.03 / Final:  96.84)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: SDG1
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/26/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


What up dawg! How are you and Meg doing?
I still have a job. It has been an extremely rocky time. However, I feel optimistic that our trading business will continue in some fashion. I believe that we will be bought out by an investment bank and that we will be able to start trading again. The chances are good that I will have to thin out my group a bit, I am hoping that attrition will take care of some of the members of the group. I think we are going to let traders out of their contract if they want to leave. Hopefully that will cut down on any direct lay-offs I will have to do. It would suck having to lay-off good people. Its worrisome but like I said, I am optimistic. Soccer was going well, but I sprained my knee pretty badly playing indoor last night, so another two-three weeks before I am out there playing again...bollocks! Its ridiculous. How are things with you? I have two tickets to Mark Lanegan on December 19th at Berbatis Pan.  Are you going to be in town at that point? Its gonna be sweet.
Still enjoying the Audi. My address is 1005 SW Park Ave. #706, Portland OR, 97205. Give me a ring and let me know what the word is. 503-887-3449.

Later,
Bill

-----Original Message-----
From: Brendan Adams [mailto:BAdams@geraldmartin.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 7:38 AM
To: Williams III, Bill
Subject: Hello

So, do you still have a job? What is your address?

Brendan Adams
Project Manager
Gerald Martin, Ltd


Start Date: 3/30/01; HourAhead hour: 21;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001033021.txt


Spoke to Carrie at the lawyer's office today.  Everything has been signed by
Mary and Carrie will mail me the originals to sign.  I asked about a
termination ont he $1500.00, Joal told Carrie that since we couldn't include
it in this agreement since we didn't agree to it in the meeting with Mary.
IF Mary agrees, they will prepare and addendum to the original agreement.
I've learned a lot and the sooner we are through with this lawyer the happier
I will be.  BE NICE NOW.


Any GCP adjustments will be highlighted in blue.

 Rgds.

 Samuel x3-9890
 Enron Net Works _ Global Counterparty Team

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Moran, Tom
Sent: Tuesday, May  22, 2001 4:51 PM
To: Lambert, Karen; Jones, Tana; Schott, Samuel; Taylor, Mark; Reves, Brant;
Brackett, Debbie R.; Clark, Cynthia; Enron Europe Global CounterParty,;
Sever, Stephanie; Moran, Tom; Clark, Claudia; Bradford, William S.; Lees,
Lisa; Fayett, Juana; Morse, Jana; Le, Trang; Maley, Paul; Clarke, Sonya;
Davies, Tim; O'day, Karen; Rohauer, Tanya; Lombardi, Kelly; Lindsay, Brian;
EOL Call Center; Hare, Bill D.; Heffernan, Amy; LaFuze, Molly; Clark, Danny;
Panus, Stephanie; Mandola, Teresa; Kyle III, Bill; Ebow, Amber; Arnold, Thu
Pham; Coleman, Tandra; Campbell, Lesli; Lebrocq, Wendi
Subject: EOL Approvals: 05-22-01

Please see attached

 << File: EOL 05-22-01.xls >>

Regards,
Tom Moran
713-853-3017


From MIKE ROBERTS Group:

Hello!

Here's how you and the people you work with can access our website:

http://enaresearch.corp.enron.com

Use the drop-down menu on the left to go to what you need.  Weather is
especially helpful.  If you have any problems pulling it up, or if you have
any other questions, I am here to help.  E-mail me!

I encourage you to forward this to your people on the trading floor.

Or, you can call me at 58322.

Thank You,

Sam Smith
Enron Research


Shelley, hope all is going well.  We have submitted everything required on
	on Performance reviews, including Merits, Bonuses and Performance Review forms.

	The only thing missing, is Performance Review forms for the Directors.  If
	you have them done and on your computer, could you send them to me.

	If not, send me a note.  I'll do something to get us by until you get back.

	Take care and we look forward to seeing you next week.  Lynn


Attached are some notes from Michelle Cash.


You're on.  He's getting to be such a good age for theater.

ckm

"Brashear, Charlotte" <cbrashear@velaw.com> on 03/16/2001 03:18:56 PM
To: "'Kay.Mann@enron.com'" <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: RE: The Lion King

   I would love to.  He is going to flip over it!

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 3:17 PM
To: Brashear, Charlotte
Cc: Mann Neil (E-mail)
Subject: Re: The Lion King

My guess would be the week of the 4th of July, then again sometime in
August.  I agree that he really should see it.  If you want to take him,
that's great, or we will be glad to take him.

Kay

"Brashear, Charlotte" <cbrashear@velaw.com> on 03/16/2001 03:12:14 PM

To:   "Mann Kay (E-mail)" <kmann@enron.com>
cc:   "Mann Neil (E-mail)" <nmann@erac.com>

Subject:  The Lion King

           I keep forgetting to discuss this with you.  The Lion King will
be
here for the entire month of July, and Michael MUST see it.  I don't care
whether you two take him or me, but it's an absolute.  This will be my
third
time to see it.  The tickets go on sale around June 1.  Do you know yet
when
you will be on vacation?
          ++++++CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE+++++
The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged.  This
email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization
named above.  If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized
representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any,
or the information contained herein is prohibited.  If you have received
this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email
and delete this email from your system.  Thank You

          ++++++CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE+++++
The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged.  This
email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization
named above.  If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized
representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any,
or the information contained herein is prohibited.  If you have received
this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email
and delete this email from your system.  Thank You


OH, now I'm getting one word responses.

-----Original Message-----
From: Frank Telemaque [mailto:Frank_Telemaque@flexitallic.com]
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 3:36 PM
To: Davis, Dana
Subject: RE: What's happening? Are you still there?

yes,

-----Original Message-----
From: Davis, Dana [mailto:Dana.Davis@ENRON.com]
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 3:33 PM
To: Frank Telemaque
Subject: What's happening? Are you still there?

I haven't heard from you in a while.

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************

INSIST UPON GENUINE FLEXITALLIC GASKETS!
Anything else is just a copy.


---------------------- Forwarded by George Robinson/OTS/Enron on 04/11/2001
04:55 PM ---------------------------

	From:  George Robinson                           03/07/2001 03:21 PM

To: Larry Campbell/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Laguna PCB Issue

I received a call this morning from Jaroslav "Jarda" Solc (701-777-5217).
Jarda is a Senior Research Manager for the Groundwater Resource & Remediation
Group at the Energy & Environmental Research Center (EERC). Jarda reports to
Edward "Ed" Steadman, Associate Director for Research at the EERC. Norm
Moreno with the POEP had contacted Ed, provided him with my name and number,
and asked if Ed's organization would contact us in regard to the EERC
providing some assistance to TW with remediation of PCB contamination at the
Laguna site.

I provided a brief description of site conditions and we then discussed
alternative remediation methods. Based on the information I provided, Jarda
agreed that continued monitoring seemed to be appropriate. Jarda also
indicated that his group did not have any off-the-shelf type remediation
technologies that would be applicable. I suggested to Jarda that his
organization might still be of service to TW in our discussions with the
Pueblo and the POEP as a third party opinion. Jarda said that he would
discuss this with Ed and get back to me.


solid.  thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"fletch" <fsturm@enron.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Monday, February 04, 2002 12:38 PM
To:	wphilip@enron.com
Subject:	Message from fletch

From: fletch

Link to information: http://www.cboe.com/TradTool/OptionCalculator.asp?


great

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 10:18 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:

oh i found your peppermints.


TASK ASSIGNMENT

Status:		completed

Task Priority:		1
Task Due On:		11/21/2000
Task Start Date:	11/21/2000


College Game day on ESPN will be in Norman, OK for the game Saturday!!!  Be sure to watch....

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	KenRCars@aol.com@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-KenRCars+40aol+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Tuesday, September 25, 2001 1:24 PM
To:	cwcarso@yahoo.com; Carson, Mike; mcarson@gtemail.net; jcarson222@yahoo.com; discostars222@yahoo.com; scarsonpro@pga.com; TravisWC@aol.com; BOB5OOO@aol.com; EWHITE4057@aol.com; JanC33@aol.com
Subject:	news

Well, I will tell you this has been discussed in our defense circles for
sometime now......unfortunately.....it may be time.
Kenny


This is a very rough draft based on an agreement done previously with a jv
company.  I'm sending it for Enron review only, since I haven't even read the
entire thing yet.  I thought you might want to take a look at it to see what
you think, and to consider the scope of the services to be provided.

As for legal services, one alternative would be to have the services provided
by an outside law firm, not associated with either principal.

Could you forward me what you received from Clement regarding the corporate
guaranty issue?  I would like to see what's the latest in that regard.

Thanks,

Kay


Attached is the Weekly Report for week ending November 10.

On Monday, I will release this same report with all associated orders
linked.  As of next week, our Weekly Government Affairs (Gas) Reports will be
accessible only on our ETS website.  Many prior reports are already archived
for your convenience.


Don't forget to save a copy of the P&L in the O:/1 intra/West/P&L's/2001/1201/WC CAL folder as the current date.  Also, don't forget to run the HS_TRANSPORT-WEST hedgestrip.  Ryan's instructions are in the West Desk Consoidated P&L Procedures file that I e-mailed earlier on the second tab.


Dude:  Thanks very much.  Looking forward to tonite.  You won't believe
this--this morning, I heard on the radio that today--that's right, today--is
Doc Watson's birthday.  Killer...

Best,
Jeff


i can make it if we are the 7:30 game.


The cash flows for 2001 are currently locked, but if we get a chance to
adjust for carry forwards we will.   Worst case is that the dollars will have
to be reapproved as outside of the budget.     Likely that we will be able to
do some internal moving of dollars to compensate for this, but not guarenteed.

Steve Gilbert
12/12/2000 01:55 PM
To: Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON
cc: Kimberly Watson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Martha Janousek/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, John
Fiscus/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Revenue Management Expenditures

While talking with Kim and Martha a question was asked  on capital budgeting
for Revenue Management..  The question has to do with carrying over
previously  approved dollars from 2000 to 2001.

The facts ($millions) :

2000 Revenue Management Budget:

$5.7 - Original RM Phase one approval
$(1.0)  In July 00, this amount was approved to spend in 2001 (in the 2001
budget as a line item)
$4.7    Expected expenditures in 2000 for Phase one.

$(1.0) Current assessment of money not needed for Phase one deliverables
(estimated, may still change)
$3.7     Amount  approved  with current work-orders
$  .8     Possible amount to be carried over and spent in 2001
$2.9     Phase one amount to be spent in 2000

2001 Revenue Management Budget:

$ 1.0   Phase one approved carryover  (in 2001 budget)
$  .8  Estimated additional carryover   (not currently in 2001 budget)
$3.0 Phase two   ( in 2001 budget  in the Marketing Pool)
$ 4.8  Total to be  spent in 2000

Question:
Since the $.8 was approved and is covered in the existing work-orders, can
this be additive to the 2001 budget without any further approval - even
though it is not currently a line item in the 2001 budget?  Or does the  $.8
have to be offset against the Marketing Pool?

If this $.8 does go against the Marketing pool of $15.0 million, will the
revenues generated from Revenue Management  reduce the revenues generated
from the pool?  In other words If the capital dollars from the pool are
reduced because of RM will the revenues also be reduced?


---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 10/10/2000 08:06 AM
---------------------------

"K. Bass" <daphneco64@bigplanet.com> on 10/10/2000 06:18:35 AM
Please respond to "K. Bass" <daphneco64@bigplanet.com>
To: "Larry W. Bass" <lwbthemarine@bigplanet.com>
cc: bdeck62@yahoo.com, "Bass, Jason" <Jason.Bass2@COMPAQ.com>, Eric Bass
<Eric.Bass@enron.com>
Subject: The Weekly Standard Magazine

?

?http://www.theweeklystandard.com/magazine/mag_6_5_00/parody_6_5_00.asp
 - The Weekly Standard Magazine.url


================================================================
As requested, your News Alert for CMGI
follows from EquityAlert.com.
To edit/discontinue your alerts please refer to end of message.
PLEASE REVIEW THE NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER BELOW
================================================================

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-= Paid Advertisement -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Medical Advisory Systems, Inc. (AMEX: DOC) is the most recent
discovery of D.H Talbot, Industry Analyst & Man. Dir. of
Health/Vest Advisors.

He picked NEOL at $4 (recent high of   $41) & IMGN at $12 (recent
high  of $42).

Fueled by strong growth, Mr. Talbot feels revenues could top $25
million (150% Y/Y growth) w/expected EPS of $1/share for FY2001.

Click here for your FREE research report:

http://205.210.134.51/a1.asp?ID=1266aa

AOL USERS: copy & paste the link above into your browser.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Earnings.com to Feature Live and On-Demand Webcasts of Earnings Calls for
Adobe, CMGI, Oracle, and Red Hat

NEW YORK, Dec 13, 2000 /PRNewswire via COMTEX/ -- Earnings.com, Inc., the
leading network of financial events for individual and institutional
investors,
will be providing conference call webcasts, earnings estimates, earnings
dates,
and earnings releases for Adobe, (Nasdaq: ADBE), CMGI (Nasdaq: CMGI), Oracle
(Nasdaq: ORCL), and Red Hat (Nasdaq: RHAT).

Free access to these live and on-demand events, detailed earnings estimates,
analyst research, and a personalized earnings calendar, is available at
http://www.earnings.com. Further company research and data is available by
clicking on the following links:

The following companies will be reporting earnings on Thursday, December 14th,
2000:

Adobe Systems Incorporated (ADBE) Earnings:
http://www.earnings.com/fin/erngsDtl.jsp?tckr=ADBE&eff=1700-01-01&exch=4

CMGI, Inc. (CMGI) Earnings:
http://www.earnings.com/fin/erngsDtl.jsp?tckr=CMGI&eff=1700-01-01&exch=4

Oracle Corporation (ORCL) Earnings:
http://www.earnings.com/fin/erngsDtl.jsp?tckr=ORCL&eff=1700-01-01&exch=4

Red Hat, Inc. (RHAT) Earnings:
http://www.earnings.com/fin/erngsDtl.jsp?tckr=RHAT&eff=1700-01-01&exch=4

*Dates and times of events subject to change. Please check the Earnings.com
website (www.earnings.com) prior to event for verification.

About Earnings.com

Earnings.com is the leading network for online investors seeking sophisticated
financial information. The company tracks earnings dates, conference call
webcasts, earnings estimates, analyst research, press releases, and event
calendars on over 10,000 public companies. Public companies are provided with
a
secure page on the Earnings.com website (http://www.earnings.com) where
information they submit is simultaneously pushed out to hundreds of thousands
of
individual and institutional investors via the Earnings.com advanced alerting
system.

Combined with a full suite of webcasting services, in partnership with Globix
Corporation (Nasdaq: GBIX), the Earnings.com network is a powerful tool which
public companies can use to comply with recently passed Regulation FD. For
more
information on communication solutions for the financial community, please
contact: info@earnings.com or http://www.earnings.com.

SOURCE Earnings.com, Inc.

CONTACT:          Dan Vene, President & CEO of Earnings.com, Inc.,
212-594-1622,
press@earnings.com

URL:              http://www.earnings.com
http://www.prnewswire.com

(C) 2000 PR Newswire.  All rights reserved.

-0-

KEYWORD:          New York
INDUSTRY KEYWORD: MLM
FIN
SUBJECT CODE:     ERN

****************** TO EDIT YOUR EQUITY ALERTS ********************
To unsubscribe or edit your alerts, visit
http://www.equityalert.com/alerts.asp?uid=alewis34&xid=40352
******************************************************************

***IMPORTANT NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER REGARDING THIS COURTESY EMAIL**
At your request, as a subscriber to our service, this email alert
is being sent to you as a courtesy and is for information purposes
only.  We are a financial news re-distributor.  We are not an
investment advisory and do not purport to tell or suggest which
companies you should monitor or which securities you should
purchase or sell.
In addition to the information regarding the company you are
monitoring (the &Monitored Company8), this email contains an
advertisement describing a product, service or company for which we
received a fee, at our normal advertising rates of $55 per 1,000 e-
mails (subject to volume and other discounts), from the advertising
company.  In addition, not withstanding our policy of prohibiting
employees from buying or selling securities of an advertising
company for a period of 20 days following dissemination of the
advertisement, we may not be able to effectively monitor our
employees to ensure compliance with the same. Consequently, there
may be sales and/or purchases of such securities by our employees
prior to, during and immediately following the dissemination of the
advertisement.
Please note that (1) this email may not contain the full text of
the press release issued by, or the research or other reports
regarding, the Monitored Company; and (2) the text of the
advertisement, the press release and/or reports were obtained from
third party sources and were not written, generated or edited by
us; accordingly, we make no representations or give any assurance
as to the accuracy or completeness, nor have we conducted any
independent investigations of, the disclosures regarding the
subject matter of such releases and reports.
Please note that links to the advertising company and/or Monitored
Company are provided for your convenience.  We assume no obligation
for the content of such sites.
All information contained herein should be independently verified
by you with the advertising company or with Monitored Company or
any other sources you prefer.
[THIS IS ONLY A SUMMARY OF, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO, THE &EQUITYALERT SUBSCRIBER AGREEMENT AND
DISCLAIMER.8 PLEASE VISIT
http://www.equityalert.com/home/disclaim.asp
FOR ACCESS TO OUR COMPLETE DISCLAIMER]
******************************************************************


Looks like we are getting another $5,000.00 from the asbestos settlement.
Maybe I should just keep this to myself.  I'm so poor and I need so much.

Don, why don't I mail this other ag exemption to you and you can fill it out
just like the first one you sent in?  What mailing address should I use?

I'm going to the doctor this afternoon for my allergies.  I hate getting old.


The IPPNY/SSK communications effort for NY is finally a go!  Since I will be on a train from Philly to NYC tomorrow during the Leadership call the following is a quick summary of what's going on in NY.

IPPNY/EPSA
Gavin Donohue, Mark Stultz and myself met Tuesday for lunch and discussed each organizations' communications efforts and the need for coordination given the overlap in membership, the dual focus on NYC, and the costs involved.

The EPSA effort is a "reassurance" campaign for states who have already begun deregulation but who might be nervous to proceed after witnessing the CA debacle.
EPSA is working with the Chamber of Commerce and is focused on four markets (Boston, NYC, Baltimore and DC).
EPSA contracted with a PR firm out of Austin, TX and they have already developed 3 broadcast advertising spots (Mark is on the steering committee and should have access to the spots)
EPSA shared the spots with SSK and IPPNY yesterday (which SSK didn't like very much)
The ads would run on PBS and cable - the media buys have not been purchased yet.
Apparently EPSA developed the ads and are running them past focus groups as we speak
Interestingly enough, the spot which they developed for the eastern states used the word deregulation over and over (a word that is not popular here).
AND when tested among the opinion elites - they didn't know who PJM was!!
Lastly, the accompanying print ad isn't that impressive.
Mark will have access  to the ads and - as a steering committee member - will have the opportunity to weigh in on the ad and decide whether to move to the second phase of funding.
The good news is that EPSA has agreed to not interfere with what IPPNY is doing in NY and will work with us as our efforts evolve.

IPPNY/SSK
During our meeting on Tuesday, we finalized the initial press release, and agreed on the inserts for the press kit.  Apparently, Hillary Clinton and other members of the NY delegation are holding an energy roundtable on Monday.  IPPNY's press release will go out over the wires Monday around 11:00 am and will hopefully get dual coverage from reporters who are covering Hillary's event.  I'll forward to you the final release but it generally says that IPPNY is unveiling its Energy Solutions Program - a five point action plan to address the long and short term energy needs of NY (designed to avoid a CA-style energy crisis).  The plan includes energy conservation (which was on the top of new yorkers minds in the statewide poll), accelerated siting process, creation of an efficient, multi-state energy marketplace, upgrading the state's power transmission system and encouraging utilities to enter into contracts that protect consumers from volatile energy prices.

Gavin will be back in NYC on July 10th for media training and SSK is in the process of lining him up for meetings with press outlets and other organizations.

We're also planning to schedule him at various events around the state which deal with energy issues.

We hope to host some sort of energy roundtable of our own at the IPPNY fall meeting in October.

As for advertising, we don't have the funds or the commitment today but after we launch this effort we're going to pull the participating companies together to have a discussion about advertising and to guage whether they want to support it with additional funds.

I'll get you final copies of the release and press kit as soon as they are put together.

To date, Enron is in for 50K in NY but it's been an expensive three months of research, and prep time and materials so managing the budget is going to be an issue throughout the summer.

I will be in PJM all day Thursday to cover PJM's initial meeting for the development of their communications office and get a rundown of their plans for "messaging"


i am sorry to hear that.  i had no idea.  i knew you told me he was ill.  are
you ok?


Two heavy load schedules had late afternoon difficulty, and will need to be
implemented on real time for Jan 4th HLH.

10 mw - BPA C#23845-EPMI-PGET-PWX-BPA(T)SYS/BCB O#10030 HNF-PWX-BCH(T)BCB/SYS
O#257654 NF-BCH@SYS

AND

4 mw-BPA C#23851-EPMI-PGET-PWX-BPA(T)SYS/BCB O#10030 HNF-PWX-BCH(T)BCB/SYS
O#257654 NF-BCH@SYS

Please call in these schedules to the real time departments of our
counterparties.

Call Donald if you have any questions.

c


_________________________________________________________________

                SPECIAL OFFER FROM THE MOTLEY FOOL
             Motley Fool Research Industry Focus 2001

benjamin.rogers@enron.com
_________________________________________________________________

Greetings!

We've put our best investment ideas for 2001 into a
comprehensive 190 page research report, and we'd like to offer
our most loyal Fools a $10 DISCOUNT on an advance order.
http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=233177

In the Motley Fool Research Industry Focus 2001, the Motley Fool
Research team examines 17 industries and identifies the most
promising stocks in each. We mine for potential winners in
sectors like Wireless, Biotechnology, and Optical Networking,
and also explore which companies are poised to outperform on the
international and small-cap investing landscapes.
_________________________________________________________________

BUY NOW AND SAVE $10!!!
http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=233178
_________________________________________________________________

Which biotech companies will break out from the pack? We've got
the scoop. Who will lead the wireless revolution in 2001? Dial
in to find out. Which companies measure up best to the Foolish 8
small-cap investing criteria? Industry Focus 2001 provides a
thorough analysis.

No investment is a sure thing, but you can improve your odds by
investing in those companies that are leading their industries
and defining tomorrow's innovations. Industry Focus 2001 will
help you do just that.

Place your advance order today and receive $10 off of the cover
price. This offer is good through December 15!
http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=233179

Fool on,
The Motley Fool Research Team

_____________________________________________________

You may change or cancel your subscription at any time.
http://www.fool.com/community/freemail/freemaillogin.asp?email=benjamin.rogers
@enron.com
_____________________________________________________
(c) Copyright 2000, The Motley Fool.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=233180

MsgId:
msg-20734-2000-12-07_17-06-55-6161559_0_Plain_MessageAddress.msg-17:08:19(12-0
7-2000)
X-Version: mailer-sender-master,v 1.84
X-Version: mailer-sender-daemon,v 1.84
Message-Recipient: benjamin.rogers@enron.com


Vince -

Here's a summary of what's going to the BOD, along with updated policy.  Feel
free to call me if you have any questions.

Regards,
Cassandra.


if i could get a guaranteed contract plus tips i would skip the trip.  remember how great my legs would look dancing all over the chicks.


This is the list of projects for the members of the "quant" team.
If you are working on different project, please, ignore this message.

Please, develop in a spreadsheet solutions/examples for the following:

1. Black-Scholes formula
2. Black's formula
3. Develop a spreadsheet to simulate price trajectory using:
 a. GBM
 b. GBM + jump (Formula 2.16 in the book, Figure 2.7)
 c. Mean reversion + jump (Formula 2.17, Figure 2.8)
4. Schwartz Single Factor Model (Formula 6.12)
5. Develop models corresponding to the Figures 7.1, 7.3, 7.5, 7.6, 7.8

Vince


----- Original Message -----
From: "Coy Price" <coyprice1@yahoo.com>
To: "Dusty Baker" <duck@pdq.net>; "Lee Ann Baker" <phaedra@txucom.net>
Cc: "BrianTracy Samples" <tls@txucom.net>; "Shannon Tyer"
<shannontyer@email.msn.com>; "Jimmy Briscoe" <james.briscoe@inteq.com>;
"Donna Humphrey" <hannod@yahoo.com>
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 11:24 AM
Subject: Fwd: Fw: "Medical Terms"

>
> Note: forwarded message attached.
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals.
> http://personals.yahoo.com

X-Apparently-To: coyprice1@yahoo.com via web13006.mail.yahoo.com; 27 Oct 2001 04:48:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Track: 1: 40
Received: from oe71.pav0.hotmail.com  (EHLO hotmail.com) (64.4.33.213)  by mta470.mail.yahoo.com with SMTP; 27 Oct 2001 04:48:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC;	 Sat, 27 Oct 2001 04:48:20 -0700
X-Originating-IP: [63.39.2.37]
From: "Kenneth Baker" <javalleyranch@msn.com>
To: "connie durdin" <conirae@hotmail.com>,	"Coy Price" <coyprice1@yahoo.com>,	"justin baker" <onerooster74@hotmail.com>,	"donna keeling" <keeling4@wt.net>,	"randy shelly" <rshelly@misd.org>,	"tammy graham" <Bobohoho1@aol.com>
Subject: Fw: "Medical Terms"
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2001 06:47:52 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MSN Explorer 7.00.0021.1700
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_001_0000_01C15EB3.4D541EC0"
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Oct 2001 11:48:20.0246 (UTC) FILETIME=[463FE360:01C15EDD]
Content-Length: 15169

----- Original Message -----
From: Shawn and/or Dailyn Logan
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 6:15 PM
To: Michael Brubaker; Randy Farmer; Mark Caldwell; Kenny Baker; James Kennedy
Subject: "Medical Terms"

"Medical Terms"

Two Texans were having the blue-plate special at their favorite watering
hole when they heard an awful choking sound. They turned around to see a
lady a few bar stools down turning blue from wolfing down an Armadillo
burger too fast.

The first Texan said to the other, "Think we ought to help?"

"Yep," said the second Texan.

The first Texan got up and walked over to the lady and asked, "Can you
breathe?"

She shook her head no.

"Can you speak?" he asked.

She shook her head no again.

With that, he helped her to her feet, lifted up her skirt and started to
lick her butt. She was so shocked, she coughed up the obstruction and
began to breathe, with great relief.

The first Texan turned back to his friend and said, "Funny how that Hind
Lick Maneuver works every time!"

Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (www.grisoft.com ).
Version: 6.0.286 / Virus Database: 152 - Release Date: 10/9/01


The Corporate Internal Communications team would like to thank each of the 5,142 employees who took the time to complete our survey.  As promised, here are the numerical results.  We will cover the survey in its entirety - including some of your individual comments and the steps we're taking to enhance our programs - in the August issue of Enron Business.  Watch for it!

Survey respondent demographics:

Houston office	54.4%
U.S. Domestic, non-Houston	24.9%
International office	20.7%

Do you believe Enron's corporate internal communications programs (eBiz, eThink, Enron Business, ETV, floor meetings, etc.) are generally effective and useful?

Yes	83.3%
No	16.7%

Do you believe the information you receive in eBiz, Enron Business, eSpeak, ETV and at employee meetings is credible?

Yes	90.9%
No	9.1%

Have you ever used the following tools as an information or research resource?  (Check all that apply.)

eBiz	43.2%
Enron Business		34.2%
eSpeak transcripts	23.5%

Do you read eBiz (Enron's corporate online informal news source)?

Yes	64.7%
No	35.3%

If yes, which of the following eBiz features do you read?  (Check all that apply.)

Business articles	58.3%
In Layman's Terms	35.2%
Short Cuts	32.9%
The Last Word	31.2%

If no, I don't read eBiz because:

I don't have time	66.1%
I get my Enron information from other sources	30.9%
I don't find the content credible	3.1%

eBiz is posted fortnightly - every two weeks.  How frequently would you like to get eBiz?

Monthly	26.9%
Every two weeks (as is)	58.0%
Weekly	11.5%
Daily (email format)	3.6%

How do you generally read Enron Business (Enron's all-employee print and online in-depth publication)?

Print	39.7%
Online	23.4%
Both	12.9%

If you read Enron Business, what do you think of the new design?

Like it	94.7%
Don't like it	5.3%

Do you ever share the print version of Enron Business with your spouse or family?

Yes	43.4%
No	56.6%

Which of the following Enron Business features do you read?  (Check all that apply.)

Business articles	63.6%
The Insider		41.1%
Extreme Enron		38.5%
Community stories	38.2%
Generally Speaking?	36.3%
Back page (contests)	32.6%

Which of these eThink tools do you use?

eSpeak	31.2%
eMeet	4.2%
The ThinkBank	7.7%

What speakers would you like to see featured on eSpeak?  (Check all that apply.)

Ken Lay/Jeff Skilling	52.8%
Business unit CEOs	52.2%
Subject matter experts	55.6%
External speakers	37.2%

How many all-employee meetings have you attended (or watched via IPTV or video teleconference) in the last year?

0	32.5%
1	36.6%
2	30.9%

If you have attended an all-employee meeting, did you find it to be informative and beneficial?

Yes	86.6%
No	13.4%

Do you think all-employee meetings should be held more than twice a year?  (i.e., quarterly)?

Yes	44.6%
No	55.4%

What information do you want covered at an all-employee meeting?  (Check all that apply.)

Business strategy	78.7%
Financial and operating results	69.1%
Human Resource issues	55.4%
Competitor information	49.6%

For Houston office only:
Irrespective of technical problems, what do you think of ETV (elevator television) as a communication medium?

Like it	90.9%
Don't like it	9.1%

Would you use ETV to advertise one of your Enron projects or campaigns?

Yes	69.6%
No	30.4%

If you have used ETV to advertise, did you find it effective?

Yes	9.1%
No	3.3%
Haven't used it	87.6%

Which ETV segments do you like?  (Check all that apply.)

Enron announcements	39.4%
Streaming cable news	34.8%
Rebroadcast interviews with Ken and/or Jeff with CNN, CNBC, Bloomberg, etc.	32.5%
The Building Guy	29.8%
Vision & Values ads	13.8%


The Chicago Stock Exchange Presents Its Lifetime Achievement Award to Joe
Ricketts, Ameritrade Chairman and Founder

********************************

********************************

View complete article at:
http://www.stockselector.com/newsarticle.asp?symbol=AMTD&article=41622371

AMERITRADE HLDG CP CL A  8.938

CHICAGO, Dec 13, 2000 /PRNewswire via COMTEX/ -- The Chicago Stock Exchange's
(CHX) Board of Directors today will present its Lifetime Achievement Award to
Joe Ricketts, chairman and founder of Ameritrade Holding Corporation (Nasdaq:
AMTD).

The CHX instituted the Lifetime Achievement Award in

Other Companies Involved:
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

To unsubscribe, please go to
http://www.stockselector.com/modifyportfolio.asp?portnumber=1

, Copyright 1998-99, StockSelector.com


Is the October 13, rev 3 the final version?

Kay

Rusty Stevens
11/01/2000 12:26 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Schaffer Land Option - Pontiac Site

The tract is a 29.46 acre parcel that is just west of the site for our
plant.  We need to secure it to prevent other houses from being built on our
perimeter (sound receptors).  We have just worked hard to buy the other two
houses adjacent to the property to fix this problem.  Its a nice situation
since the tract is long and narrow, so we get maximum sound receptor
protection for minimal acreage purchases.  I had sent a memo to Karen Way a
while back asking them to work on this and you cautioned me to make sure I
ran kick off of outside counsel on a project past you first (if that jogs
your memory).

Anyway, this is a finishing touch on Pontiac, and I have promised the
landowner a document a while back, so I would appreciate our turning it to
him in the near future.  I have been preoccupied on some stuff in Florida,
but feel badly that we haven't gotten this out to this guy sooner.  I will
make the apology phone call (blame the big company lawyers - of course) and
let him know its on its way and not to give up on us.

Kathleen and I have already discussed this today.

How's everything going by the way ?  Long time no see.

Kay Mann
11/01/2000 11:27 AM
To: Rusty Stevens/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: Schaffer Land Option - Pontiac Site

Rusty,

You are going to have to refresh my recollection as to this piece of land.
Kathleen, could you please get with Rusty or Fred to see what's up.

Thanks,

Kay

Rusty Stevens
10/31/2000 11:26 AM
To: karen.way@piperrudnick.com, mark.gershon@piperrudnick.com, Kay
Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Schaffer Land Option - Pontiac Site

I wanted to send out a reminder to everyone that I had indicated to Mr.
Schaeffer that we would be sending him a document last week and to suggest
that we try to get something out to him this week if at all possible.

Since our critical final zoning vote is next Thursday, I want to make sure we
don't give him any reason to get "up in arms" over this issue and start
thinking we have just been leading him along without intending to follow
through on the deal.  Mark and Karen have done such an exemplary job on the
zoning (record time) that I don't want anything to get in our way at the
final moment.  Mr. Schaeffer is one of the wealthier and more influential
farmers in the area, and has thus far been pretty quiet at the meetings,
however, he pointedly cornered me at the end of our last meeting to ask about
this issue.  Lets keep him happy.

Please let me know if we can get it out this week, so I can call him and
apologize for the delay and give him a new improved delivery date of the
draft documents.

Thanks.


Sally, I have scheduled this meeting for Thursday afternoon.  Have you decided on contacts from GRMO and IT.

Thanks,
Wanda
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Curry, Wanda
Sent:	Thursday, October  11, 2001 5:44 PM
To:	Kilchrist, Shawn; Parsons, Andrew; Bharati, Rakesh; Kohli, Sandeep; Walker, Mark A.; 'john.e.sorrells@us.andersen.com'
Cc:	Beck, Sally
Subject:	Operational Risk Management

I want to move forward with scheduling the initial meeting of the Operational Risk Management task force.  How does Tuesday, October 16th and the afternoon of Thursday, October 18th look for everyone?  Please let me know your schedule for both of these dates.  Most of the task force members have been identified, with the exception of those from GRMO and IT.  Sally Beck will identify representatives from these two areas.  I would also expect that other individuals may be consulted from time to time as additional expertise or resources or required.

I intend to schedule a two-hour block of time for this meeting.  The agenda will include, at a minimum,  the following topics:

	Definition of Operational Risk for  Enron - What's in and What's Out
	Preliminary Goals for Operational Risk Management (to be refined by the group)
	     Develop Common Language
                 Identify Framework for Monitoring Risk
	     Role of this task force  - Strategy
	     Set common objectives for implementation this year and a look forward to 2002
	Current Initiatives
	Communications Plan
	Open Discussion - Other Ideas from the group
			  - Suggestions re other groups/individuals to include on the task force

I am excited about leading this initiative for Enron.  We have a unique opportunity to define operational risk measurement for Enron, develop reporting guidelines, and provide qualitative assessments of operational risk, all of which will be considered during the risk capital allocation process.   But most importantly, we can identify ways to mitigate Enron's exposure to operational risk.  Please call if you would like to discuss any of the above prior to the meeting.

Thanks,
Wanda Curry


----- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 02/27/2001 01:08 PM -----

	Michael Tribolet/ENRON@enronXgate
	02/27/2001 09:41 AM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, David W Delainey/HOU/EES@EES,
jklauber@llgm.com@SMTP@enronXgate
		 cc:
		 Subject: Transmission value and first mortgage debt

The proposed purchase of the PGE and SCE's transmission grids have vastly
different short term liquidity effects for PGE and SCE.   If the current
proposal is at 2.3x book, and assuming the first mortgage bond holders want
complete repayment in return for releasing their liens, the numbers (at
12-99) fall out:

in millions                   PGE        SCE

Book Value                    1.43       1.90
Multiple of Book              2.3x       2.3x
Cash Price                   $3.29      $4.37

-First Mortgage Bonds        $3.35      $1.18
Resulting liquidity         ($0.06)     $3.19

Note that the first mortgage holders may release their liens in return for
partial payment based on remaining value.  Nonetheless, PGE's situation is
not as flexible.


I found this table in one of the documents examined, that compares the ratings for different ISOs:
Company	Minimum Long Term Rating	Minimum Short-term rating
CAISO	A3/A- for Market Obligations A1/P1 for Grid Management Charge	A2/P2 for Market Obligations A1/P1 for Grid Management Charge
NEISO	"INVESTMENT GRADE" (equivalent BBB-)	"INVESTMENT GRADE" (equivalent A3)
NYISO	BBB/Baa2	or equivalent
PJM Interconnection	Based on PJM internal scoring system	Based on PJM internal scoring system
Ontario IMO	BBB*	or equivalent*

* The financial support obligation of a market participant may be reduced by a monetary value associated with a particular credit rating. AAA = 50 MM CAN$; AA = 25MM CAN$; A = 12.5 MM CAN$;and BBB = 5 MM CAN$. Interesting!

This table is current as of March 2000. Indeed, I think it might be a useful format to present the information found. Regards,
ALF


All:

Attached you will find a list that reflects your seat assignments for Business Continuity Planning (BCP).  These seats are located on the 30th and 31st Floors of Enron Center North (ECN).  As previously communicated, you will report to these designated seats in the event of an outage in ECS.

The exception to this is as follows:
If your seat assignment is located on the 31st Floor, you will report to your original location that you occupied prior to your move into ECS.  This will hold true until the Monday after Thanksgiving, as we will have the 31st floor seats set up at that time.

Testing:
Once you have moved to ECS, if you would like to test your BCP location, you will be able to test your seat for functionality every Thursday from 3-6pm.  Testing is not required, but is highly recommended.

If anyone has any questions or concerns about these procedures, please feel free to contact me at any time.

Regards,

Stephen R. Harrington
Technical Project Manager, ECS Project
Enron Net Works, LLC
w:  713-853-7619
p:  877-651-7361
c:  713-444-7279
stephen.harrington@enron.com


Re: assistant searches, I think you would be well advised to coordinate
closely with Janette Elbertson.


Mike Ellington, Sr. Gas Controller, submitted his resignation this morning. He is moving to Tulsa to be closer to his and his wife's elderly parents. I need to replace Mike to help reduce overtime costs and to keep from Controller burnout. What process/steps do I need to take to seek approval to replace? thanks. sj


Start Date: 3/30/01; HourAhead hour: 24;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001033024.txt


I have a couple of questions so I can wrap up the LOI:

We refer to licensed Fuel Cell Energy equipment.  Do we intend to reference a
particular manufacturer, or should this be more generic?

Do we want to attach a draft of the Development Agreement, and condition the
final deal on agreeing to terms substantially the same as what's in the
draft?  I have a concern that the Enron optionality bug could bite us on the
backside with that one.

Do we expect to have ONE EPC contract, or several?

I'm looking for the confidentiality agreement, which may be in Bart's files
(haven't checked closely yet).  If anyone has it handy, it could speed things
up for me.

Thanks,

Kay


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 03/05/2001 03:30 PM -----

	"Katie Kaplan" <kaplan@iepa.com>
	03/05/2001 03:28 PM

		 To: "'Katie Kaplan'" <kaplan@iepa.com>, "'Andy Brown (E-mail)'"
<ABB@eslawfirm.com>, "'B Brown Andy (E-mail)'" <andybrwn@earthlink.net>,
"'Baker Carolyn (E-mail)'" <cabaker@duke-energy.com>, "'Bob Escalante
(E-mail)'" <rescalante@riobravo-gm.com>, "'Bob Weisenmiller (E-mail)'"
<rbw@mrwassoc.com>, "'Curtis Kebler (E-mail)'"
<curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com>, "'Douglas Kerner (E-mail)'"
<DKK@eslawfirm.com>, "'Greg Blue (E-mail)'" <gtbl@dynegy.com>, "'Jan
Smutny-Jones (E-mail)'" <smutny@iepa.com>, "'Jean Munoz (E-mail)'"
<jmunoz@mcnallytemple.com>, "'Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)'"
<Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>, "'Joe Ronan (E-mail)'" <joer@calpine.com>, "'John
Larrea (E-mail)'" <john.g.larrea@williams.com>, "'John Stout (E-mail)'"
<John_H_Stout@reliantenergy.com>, "'Julee Malinowski-Ball (E-mail)'"
<jmball@ns.net>, "'Kassandra Gough (E-mail)'" <kgough@calpine.com>, "'kent
Palmerton (E-mail)'" <kent.palmerton@williams.com>, "'Kristin Vellandi
(E-mail)'" <kvellandi@pstrategies.com>, "'Lynn Lednicky (E-mail)'"
<lale@dynegy.com>, "'Marty Wilson (E-mail)'" <mwilson@pstrategies.com>,
"'McNally Ray (E-mail)'" <rmcnally@mcnallytemple.com>, "''Nam Nguyen'
(E-mail)'" <nam.nguyen@powersrc.com>, "'Norton Kelli (E-mail)'"
<knorton@mcnallytemple.com>, "'Paula Hall-Collins (E-mail)'"
<paula.hall-collins@williams.com>, "'Pigott Jack (E-mail)'"
<jackp@calpine.com>, "'Richard Hyde (E-mail)'" <rwhyde@duke-energy.com>,
"'Rob Lamkin (E-mail)'" <rllamkin@seiworldwide.com>, "'Roger Pelote
(E-mail)'" <roger.pelote@williams.com>, "'Stephanie-Newell (E-mail)'"
<stephanie-newell@reliantenergy.com>, "'Sue Mara (E-mail)'"
<smara@enron.com>, "'Theo Pahos (E-mail)'" <tpahos@ppallc.com>, "'Tom Ross
(E-mail)'" <tross@mcnallytemple.com>
		 cc: "Carol H Hudson (E-mail)" <Chudson@iepa.com>, "Jan Smutny-Jones
(E-mail)" <smutny@iepa.com>, "Steven Kelly (E-mail)" <steven@iepa.com>,
<danielle.quan-hill@mirant.com>, "'Alex Sugaoka (E-mail)'"
<alex.sugaoka@uaecorp.com>, "'Bill Carlson (E-mail)'"
<william_carlson@wastemanagement.com>, "'Bill Woods (E-mail)'"
<billw@calpine.com>, "'Bob Ellery (E-mail)'" <bellery@spi-ind.com>, "'Bob
Gates (E-mail)'" <bob.gates@enron.com>, "'Cody Carter (E-mail)'"
<cody.carter@williams.com>, "'Curt Hatton (E-mail)'"
<Curt.Hatton@gen.pge.com>, "'David Parquet'" <david.parquet@enron.com>,
"'Dean Gosselin (E-mail)'" <dean_gosselin@fpl.com>, "'Doug Fernley (E-mail)'"
<fernley.doug@epenergy.com>, "'Duane Nelsen (E-mail)'"
<dnelsen@gwfpower.com>, "'Ed Tomeo (E-mail)'" <ed.tomeo@uaecorp.com>,
"'Eileen Koch (E-mail)'" <eileenk@calpine.com>, "'Eric Eisenman (E-mail)'"
<eric.eisenman@gen.pge.com>, "'Frank DeRosa (E-mail)'"
<frank.derosa@gen.pge.com>, "Frazier Blaylock (E-mail)"
<frazier_blaylock@ogden-energy.com>, "'Hap Boyd (E-mail)'"
<Hap_Boyd@enron.com>, "'Hawks Jack (E-mail)'" <jack.hawks@gen.pge.com>, "'Jim
Willey (E-mail)'" <elliottsa@earthlink.net>, "'Joe Greco (E-mail)'"
<jgreco@caithnessenergy.com>, "'Jonathan Weisgall (E-mail)'"
<jweisgall@aol.com>, "'Kate Castillo (E-mail)'" <CCastillo@riobravo-gm.com>,
"'Kelly Lloyd (E-mail)'" <kellyl@enxco.com>, "'Ken Hoffman (E-mail)'"
<khoffman@caithnessenergy.com>, "'Kent Fickett (E-mail)'"
<kfickett@usgen.com>, "'Lynn Lednicky (E-mail)'"
<lynn.a.lednicky@dynegy.com>, "'Marty McFadden (E-mail)'"
<marty_mcfadden@ogden-energy.com>, "'Paula Soos'"
<paula_soos@ogden-energy.com>, "'Randy Hickok (E-mail)'"
<rjhickok@duke-energy.com>, "Rick S. Koebbe (E-mail)"
<rskoebbe@powerworksinc.com>, "'Ross Ain (E-mail)'" <ain@worldnet.att.net>,
"'Steve Iliff'" <siliff@riobravo-gm.com>, "'Steve Ponder (E-mail)'"
<steve_ponder@fpl.com>, "'Tony Wetzel (E-mail)'" <twetzel@thermoecotek.com>,
"'William Hall (E-mail)'" <wfhall2@duke-energy.com>
		 Subject: RE: Public Affairs Committee

For the call today we will be discussing:
o Overall issues (how we got here)
o Issues facing industry which require Public Affairs response
o Overall Plan for the year
o Budget and Resources
o Structure, funding and decision making
o Plan for Thursday (do we want an in-person meeting?)

Katie Kaplan
Manager of State Policy Affairs
Independent Energy Producers Association
(916) 448-9499

-----Original Message-----
From: Katie Kaplan [mailto:kaplan@iepa.com]
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2001 5:08 PM
To: 'Andy Brown (E-mail)'; 'B Brown Andy (E-mail)'; 'Baker Carolyn
(E-mail)'; 'Bob Escalante (E-mail)'; 'Bob Weisenmiller (E-mail)'; 'Curtis
Kebler (E-mail)'; 'Douglas Kerner (E-mail)'; 'Greg Blue (E-mail)'; 'Jan
Smutny-Jones (E-mail)'; 'Jean Munoz (E-mail)'; 'Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)';
'Joe Ronan (E-mail)'; 'John Larrea (E-mail)'; 'John Stout (E-mail)'; 'Julee
Malinowski-Ball (E-mail)'; 'Kassandra Gough (E-mail)'; 'Katie Kaplan
(E-mail)'; 'kent Palmerton (E-mail)'; 'Kristin Vellandi (E-mail)'; 'Lynn
Lednicky (E-mail)'; 'Marty Wilson (E-mail)'; 'McNally Ray (E-mail)'; ''Nam
Nguyen' (E-mail)'; 'Norton Kelli (E-mail)'; 'Paula Hall-Collins (E-mail)';
'Pigott Jack (E-mail)'; 'Richard Hyde (E-mail)'; 'Rob Lamkin (E-mail)';
'Roger Pelote (E-mail)'; 'Stephanie-Newell (E-mail)'; 'Sue Mara (E-mail)';
'Theo Pahos (E-mail)'; 'Tom Ross (E-mail)'
Cc: Carol H Hudson (E-mail); Katie Kaplan (E-mail); Jan Smutny-Jones
(E-mail); Steven Kelly (E-mail); 'danielle.quan-hill@mirant.com'; 'Alex
Sugaoka (E-mail)'; 'Bill Carlson (E-mail)'; 'Bill Woods (E-mail)'; 'Bob
Ellery (E-mail)'; 'Bob Gates (E-mail)'; 'Cody Carter (E-mail)'; 'Curt Hatton
(E-mail)'; 'David Parquet'; 'Dean Gosselin (E-mail)'; 'Doug Fernley
(E-mail)'; 'Duane Nelsen (E-mail)'; 'Ed Tomeo (E-mail)'; 'Eileen Koch
(E-mail)'; 'Eric Eisenman (E-mail)'; 'Frank DeRosa (E-mail)'; Frazier
Blaylock (E-mail); 'Hap Boyd (E-mail)'; 'Hawks Jack (E-mail)'; 'Jim Willey
(E-mail)'; 'Joe Greco (E-mail)'; 'Jonathan Weisgall (E-mail)'; 'Kate
Castillo (E-mail)'; 'Kelly Lloyd (E-mail)'; 'Ken Hoffman (E-mail)'; 'Kent
Fickett (E-mail)'; 'Lynn Lednicky (E-mail)'; 'Marty McFadden (E-mail)';
'Paula Soos'; 'Randy Hickok (E-mail)'; Rick S. Koebbe (E-mail); 'Ross Ain
(E-mail)'; 'Steve Iliff'; 'Steve Ponder (E-mail)'; 'Tony Wetzel (E-mail)';
'William Hall (E-mail)'
Subject: Public Affairs Committee
Importance: High

Greetings:

As many of you know, the IEP Board met last week and decided upon a new
committee structure within IEP. The Public Affairs Committee was created to
replace the Market Response Committee with Greg Blue appointed as the
interim chairperson. We would like to move to establish this new committee
as soon as possible and meet to discuss direction, specific upcoming issues,
an overall plan, budget and structure for the year. We would like to start
this process with a conference call on Monday March 5, 2001 at 3:00 p.m.
Please see call in information below. (It is not necessary for any
consultants to participate in the Monday call.)   This conference call will
be followed by an in-person meeting here at IEP on Thursday March 8, 2001 at
2:00 p.m.

If you are interested in participating on this committee please signify that
with an e-mail response to this message.

For those planning on participating on the conference call we will send out
the agenda on Monday.  During that conference call we will also set the
agenda for the Thursday in person meeting. During the Thursday meeting we
would also like to move to select a permanent chairperson.

Thank you for your attention to this important matter and I look forward to
continuing to work with each of you and make this new committee structure a
success.
I have set up a permanent Conference Call in number and Pass-code for the
Public Affairs Committee that we will use every time we have a conference
call.  We will begin using this call-in number on Monday.
The call in number for Monday's 3:00 p.m. call is is:
        1-800-486-2460
The Pass-code is:
120895

Thanks,

Katie Kaplan
Manager of State Policy Affairs
Independent Energy Producers Association
(916) 448-9499


Hi Dan
Can I get an update on what Reliant/Entex Deals have had confirms sent?
Attached is a current spreadsheet showing deals and terms.

Let me know
Thanks
Jennifer
5-7678


The next session to discuss papers on models for setting the bid-ask spread will be

Friday, June 15 2:00-3:00PM in 19C2

If you want copies of the papers Jinbaek will present ahead of time, let me know and I will provide a copy.  A summary of yesterday's session is attached.

Bob Lee


Frontera 848971.11 price changed from $15.00 to $15.0705

Kayla Harmon
Enron
Volume Management
713-345-1778


I am putting together that right now.  Thanks
Ben


Well once two max is enough. Did you have a great time?

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490