All,  A fix to prevent the occurrence of deals not bridging to Sitara from EOL when deal start and end dates were not entered on EOL has been installed and tested.THANKS

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Truong, Dat
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 5:22 PM
To:	Wei, Zhiyong
Cc:	Husain, Karima; Lim, Francis S.; Saluja, Gurdip; Sweitzer, Tara; Truong, Dat; Moorer, Torrey; Lamadrid, Victor; Severson, Russ; Grant, George
Subject:	Request for Migration of Sitara EOLBridge into Production

Hello Zhiyong,
	I have implemented an enhancement to avoid the problem of restarting the Sitara EOLBridge when there are missing startdate and enddate.  This fix will take care of this morning's problem.

EOL will be sent a Failed status similar to the following:
	message={EolTransactionId=2101638 TransactionSysDealId="" BridgeEntityName="EOLBridge" Message="Missing StartDate or EndDate" Status="F" BridgeDate="20011025170945CDT"}

I throughly tested the change by sending over 400 sample deals from this morning.  Due to the "Bid Week" window, please approve this  bridge enhancement for tonight's migration.  Thank you.

-Dat Truong x63015

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Truong, Dat
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 11:11 AM
To:	Moorer, Torrey; Lamadrid, Victor; Severson, Russ; Grant, George
Cc:	Husain, Karima; Lim, Francis S.; Saluja, Gurdip; Sweitzer, Tara
Subject:	Sitara EOL Bridge Problem Today

The problem we faced today was due to 2 eol deal packets (2098073, 2099764) not having startdate and enddate.  Missing these 2 tibco message fields caused the bridge to bounce and resulted in the queue to build up while the bridge is starting up. (The bridge takes 2 minute for startup).  Each time these deals are sent/resent, it continuously cause the Sitarar EOLBridge to restart, thus magnifying the buildup of the queue.

The corrective action we are taking at our end is to build a rejection logic when eol packets do not have start and/or enddate.

-Dat Truong


something was wrong with the email system and all the emails i sent a week
ago are getting there now.  everyone is emailing me asking what the hell my
emails mean.  i pay attention to your emails.


Steve, attached are the EHS accomplishments for mid-year, mike


[IMAGE]
			[IMAGE] [IMAGE] 		[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE] 			The spicy sweetness of grandma's cranberry sauce spills from the kitchen, and you've been humming your favorite carol all day.	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE] 				Bring on that holiday feeling
	[IMAGE] 				[IMAGE]
		[IMAGE] 		That irresistible holiday spirit is here. You'll find it in our latest selection ? more than 250 festive new items including wonderful apparel with all the trimmings, exciting gift ideas and home accents to help you deck the halls.	[IMAGE]
		[IMAGE]
		[IMAGE] 			Spread the cheer! Click the link below. http://www.coldwatercreek.com/jump.asp?linkid=1001&OfferCode=WHA1080

						Coldwater Creek  Your kind of clothes. Online. All the time. http://www.coldwatercreek.com/jump.asp?linkid=1001&OfferCode=WHA1080
Privacy, Security and Service: http://www.coldwatercreek.com/jump.asp?linkid=1100&OfferCode=WHA1080 				Outlet @ the Creek: http://www.coldwatercreek.com/jump.asp?linkid=1019&OfferCode=WHA1080 		The Gallery at Coldwater Creek: http://www.galleryatthecreek.com/jump.asp?linkid=1&OfferCode=WHG0309

At Coldwater Creek, earning
   and keeping your trust is the   standard for everything we do.  	[IMAGE]			Outlet @ the Creek
 prices on clearance, closeout and overstock items everyday. click here 	[IMAGE]
Discover one of the most extraordinary
 collections of fine jewelry and unique art objects ever gathered for the Web. www.thegalleryatcoldwatercreek.com

						To receive our e-mails in a text-only format, please reply to this message and type "change to text" in the subject field. We will make sure you receive text-only e-mails in the future.  This e-mail was sent to PATRICE.L.MIMS@ENRON.COM. If you would rather not receive future e-mails from Coldwater Creek, please reply to this message and type "remove" in the subject line. We will remove your name from our e-mail list.  Call toll-free 800-510-2808 to speak with a customer service representative.

[IMAGE]


Elvis,
The link didn't work for me, so I went to www.photoclub.com and entered
Margaret's e-mail address in the guest box and...voila...it worked!

The reunion pictures were great and now I'm going to go back and check
out your turkey day pics right now.

Happy Holidays.
-kai-
BEEK

-------------------------- eGroups Sponsor -------------------------~-~>
eGroups eLerts
It's Easy. It's Fun. Best of All, it's Free!
http://click.egroups.com/1/9698/0/_/_/_/976243727/
---------------------------------------------------------------------_->

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
smu-betas-unsubscribe@egroups.com


yeah, i have a rehearsal dinner tonight and the wedding tomorrow night...
i was feeling so bad on wed. morning! i think i had one to many glasses of
red wine and the headache to show for it. how did you feel? what are you up
to this weekend?

-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 12:31 PM
To: ASoRelle@h-s.com
Subject: Re: FW: slut......serves her right haha

are you going out this weekend?  i think you said you had a wedding to go
to or something?     were you hurting on wednes morning?


Great!  Hopefully we will be able to sign soon.

Thanks!

Marie

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	James Giordano <jgiordano@catequil.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-James+20Giordano+20+3Cjgiordano+40catequil+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Thursday, August 23, 2001 3:27 PM
To:	Heard, Marie
Subject:	RE: ISDA Master Agreements

Marie,

Looks fine,   I will forward to our attorney for one last look.

Thanks

Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: Marie.Heard@enron.com [mailto:Marie.Heard@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 4:19 PM
To: jgiordano@catequil.com
Subject: RE: ISDA Master Agreements

Oops, sorry!

     (See attached file: 037BCTR(CATEQUIL OVERSEAS).RED.DOC)      (See
attached file: 039BCTR(CATEQUIL PARTNERS).RED.DOC)

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   James Giordano <jgiordano@catequil.com>@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-James+20Giordano+20+3Cjgiordano+40catequil+2Ecom+3E+40ENR
ON@ENRON.com]

   Sent:   Thursday, August 23, 2001 3:04 PM
   To:     Heard, Marie
   Subject:  RE: ISDA Master Agreements

   Marie,

   There are no attachments, please resend

   Thanks

   Jim

   -----Original Message-----
   From: Heard, Marie [mailto:Marie.Heard@ENRON.com]
   Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 4:07 PM
   To: jgiordano@catequil.com
   Subject: ISDA Master Agreements

   Mr. Giordano:

   Attached are the final blacklined drafts of the ISDA Master Agreements
   for Catequil Overseas Partners Ltd. and Catequil Partners L.P., which
   incorporate your comments sent to us on 8/22.  With respect to
   "Valuation and Timing", we just inadvertently left that comment in, but
   have now deleted it.

   Please let us know if the final comments are acceptable to you and, if
   so, we will finalize copies for execution.

   Thanks!

   Marie Heard
   Senior Legal Specialist
   Enron North America Corp.
   Phone:  (713) 853-3907
   Fax:  (713) 646-3490
   marie.heard@enron.com

   **********************************************************************
   This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
   and
   may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
   intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
   others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
   authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
   reply
   to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
   all
   copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
   intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence
   a
   binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
   affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not
   be
   relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
   Thank you.
   **********************************************************************


FYI.  Lauren Ipsen at Cisco told me that she forwarded our package of
letters, etc. to the AEA.

Best,
Jeff

	Karen Denne
	04/04/2001 05:17 PM

		 To: Janel Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron,
jkradin@marathon-com.com, syamane@marathon-com.com, Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Sun Microsystems

Ken Lay put a call in today to Scott McNealy.  His office called back to find
out what specific bill included direct access.  When I called back, they put
me in touch with Mavis Toscano, who's in Sun Microsystems' state and local
government affairs office.  She's Scott's point person on public policy, and
she's been working on the energy issue.  Mavis had done some checking and no
one had heard anything about direct access.

Sun is active in three main trade associations: the Chamber, the American
Electronics Association (AEA) and Technet.  None of those organizations said
their members were asking for direct access, but Mavis promised to put calls
in to them and get direct access on the radar screen.  Although she said
they're not inclined to send letters, Mavis said she'd make some calls into
the legislators, specifically Bowen.

Contact info:

Mavis Toscano
901 San Antonio Road
MS PAL 01-554
Palo Alto, CA 94303
650-336-7115
650-336-0835 - fax
mavis.toscano@sun.com


Time:		Today through June 7
Outage: 	EBS
Purpose: 	Scheduled Maintenance
Impact: 	No downtime anticipated
Contact:	Gail Kettenbrink, Network Engineer, 713-853-4524

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Randy_Klug@enron.net@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Randy+5FKlug+40enron+2Enet+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Tuesday, June 05, 2001 5:32 PM
To:	Randy_Klug@enron.net; Lisa_Hucke@enron.net
Subject:	EBS Maintenance Notification

Please note that all times are in Greenwich Mean Time (GMT).  Questions?  Call
the NOC at 800-267-7028.

AFTS/Fiber Transport:

   Service Affecting:

6/09/01 0705 to 1105 GMT.  EBS TT # ECTHOU000019700.  CM # 3572.  Scheduled
maintenance by EBS personnel in Denver, CO to Roll  OC12 from GSR to Lucent 2.5G
and back to GSR.  1 hr. outage - based on 30 minute outage and 30 minute
backout, is expected.  Customers will be notified.
STATUS:  PENDING

6/11/01 0400 to 1200 GMT.  EBS TT # ECTHOU000019400.  CM # 3471.  Scheduled
maintenance by EBS personnel in Jefferson Parish, LA for section replacement and
depth change of cable.  15 minute down time per ribbon.  Customers have been
notified.
STATUS:  SCHEDULED

6/22/01 0400 to 1200 GMT.  EBS TT # ECTHOU000019171.  CM # 3407.  Scheduled
maintenance by EBS personnel in the Texas Triangle to perform fiber splice due
to Road Move.  Customers have been notified.
STATUS:  SCHEDULED

   Non-Service Affecting:

6/06/01 0200 GMT.  EBS TT # ECTHOU000019669.  CM # 3574.  Scheduled maintenance
by EBS personnel between Lubbock and Proffit, TX  to perform channel roll of
circuit.  No customer downtime is expected.
STATUS:  SCHEDULED

6/07/01 0000 GMT.  EBS TT # ECTHOU000019702.  CM # 3577.  Scheduled maintenance
by EBS personnel between Los Angeles, CA and Salt Lake City, UT to perform
channel roll of circuit.  No customer downtime is expected.
STATUS:  SCHEDULED

6/12/01 1300 GMT.  EBS TT # ECTHOU000019397.  CM # 3463.  Scheduled maintenance
by EBS Operations Technicians in Walcott and Medicine Bow to assist in locating
and testing the fiber repair.  No downtime is expected.
STATUS:  SCHEDULED

   Completed:

NETWORK:

   Service Affecting:

6/09/01 0701 to 0731 GMT.  EBS TT # ECTHOU000019460.  360 Networks #
SM-060901-01.  Scheduled maintenance by 360 Networks in Seattle, WA to change
timing mode on external line.  Customers have been notified.
STATUS:  SCHEDULED

   Non-Service Affecting:

5/31/01 thru 6/06/01  2000 GMT.  EBS TT # ECTHOU000019608.  CM # 3553.
Scheduled maintenance by EBS personnel in Miami, FL for Installation of
equipment and test physical connectivity.  No downtime is expected.
STATUS:  IN PROGRESS

6/01/01 thru 6/22/01 0401 to 1000 GMT.  EBS TT # ECTHOU000019594.  Level 3 #
260426.  Scheduled maintenance by Level 3 in Atlanta, GA to provide a fiber ring
surrounding the ATL POP.  No downtime is expected.
STATUS:  IN PROGRESS

6/01/01 thru 6/22/01 0401 to 1000 GMT.  EBS TT # ECTHOU000019598.  Level 3 #
260432.  Scheduled maintenance by Level 3 in Atlanta, GA to install ATM linecard
in ATL POP.  No downtime is expected.
STATUS:  IN PROGRESS

6/01/01 thru 6/22/01 0401 to 1000 GMT.  EBS TT # ECTHOU000019600.  Level 3 #
264903.  Scheduled maintenance by Level 3 in Atlanta, GA to provide a fiber ring
surrounding the ATL POP.  No downtime is expected.
STATUS:  IN PROGRESS

6/02/01 thru 06/07/01 1100 GMT.  EBS TT # ECTHOU000019366.  Level 3 # 257722.
Level 3 personnel in New York City, NY to splice a total of 40 fibers.  No
downtime is expected.
STATUS:  IN PROGRESS

6/03/01 thru 6/10/01 1000 to 1200 GMT.  EBS TT # ECTHOU000019268.  Telehouse #
06032001.  Scheduled maintenance by Telehouse for Broadway Power.  No downtime
is expected.
STATUS:  IN PROGRESS

6/04/01 thru 6/10/01 1400 GMT.  EBS TT # ECTHOU000019663.  CM # 3566.  Scheduled
maintenance by EBS personnel between Los Angeles, CA and New York, NY for new
customer turnup and testing.  No downtime is expected.
STATUS:  IN PROGRESS

06/04/01 thru 06/07/01 2300 to 0500 GMT.  EBS TT # NOCPDX000018735.  Global
Crossing # 3025.  Scheduled maintenance by Global Crossing personnel in
Cleveland, OH to replace section of cable due to bridge construction.  Switch
hits expected on OC3 between New York, NY to Chicago, IL and Houston, TX to
Washington DC.  No downtime is expected.
STATUS:  IN PROGRESS

6/06/01 2100 GMT.  EBS TT # ECTHOU000019664.  CM # 3567.  Scheduled maintenance
by EBS personnel in Houston, TX to perform Security Scan of  the Network.  No
downtime is expected.
STATUS:  SCHEDULED

6/06/01 1600 GMT.  The following CM #'s: 3280, 3279, 3276, 3275.  Scheduled
maintenance by EBS personnel who will be removing CPE equipment in the following
cities: Washington, DC, Seattle, WA and Detroit, MI.  No downtime is expected.
STATUS:  SCHEDULED

6/07/01 1600 GMT.  CM # 3284.  Scheduled maintenance by EBS personnel who will
be removing CPE equipment in Detroit, MI.  No downtime is expected.
STATUS:  SCHEDULED

6/07/01 thru 6/14/01 1500 GMT.  EBS TT # ECTHOU000019606.  CM # 3550.  Scheduled
maintenance by EBS personnel in Las Vegas, NV for new customer turnup and
testing.  No downtime is expected.
STATUS:  SCHEDULED

6/07/01 1800 GMT.  EBS TT # ECTHOU000019607.  CM # 3552.  Scheduled maintenance
by EBS personnel in Houston, TX to loop back interface on Houston facility.  No
downtime is expected.
STATUS:  SCHEDULED

6/07/01 2100 GMT.  EBS TT # ECTHOU000019666.  CM # 3568.  Scheduled maintenance
by EBS personnel in Houston, TX to perform Security Scan of the Network.  No
downtime is expected.
STATUS:  SCHEDULED

6/07/01  2100 GMT.  EBS TT # ECTHOU000019668.  CM # 3570.  Scheduled maintenance
by EBS personnel in Houston, TX to update a FTP server.  No downtime is
expected.
STATUS:  SCHEDULED

6/08/01 1600 GMT.  The following CM #'s: 3274, 3292.  Scheduled maintenance by
EBS personnel who will be removing CPE equipment in Chicago, IL.  No downtime is
expected.
STATUS:  SCHEDULED

6/09/01 0700 GMT.  EBS TT # ECTHOU000019479.  CM # 3498.  Scheduled maintenance
by EBS personnel in Las Vegas, NV to remove all excess fiber jumpers.  No
downtime is expected.
STATUS:  SCHEDULED

6/11/01 1000 GMT.  EBS TT # ECTHOU000019705.  CM # 3578.  Scheduled maintenance
by EBS personnel in London, UK to remove unwanted patch lead.  No downtime is
expected.
STATUS:  SCHEDULED

   Completed:

6/01/01 0300-0900 GMT.  EBS TT # ECTHOU000019498.  Qwest # 60560.  Scheduled
maintenance by Qwest personnel between Sneads, FL and Tallahassee, FL to splice
Gulftels meet cable to their backbone fibers at an existing fiber splice.  No
downtime is expected.
STATUS:  COMPLETED

6/04/01 thru 6/05/01 0400 to 1000 GMT.  EBS TT # ECTHOU000019587.  Global
Crossing # 3988.  Scheduled maintenance by Global Crossing in Houston, TX,
Chicago, IL, Denver, CO, Dallas, TX to Roll traffic between buffer tubes in
preparation of a future splice.  No downtime is expected.
STATUS:  COMPLETED

6/04/01 2100 GMT.  EBS TT # ECTHOU000019665.  CM # 3567.  Scheduled maintenance
by EBS personnel between Los Angeles, CA and San Jose, CA to reboot the OCC's
locally to correct node unreachable status.  No downtime is expected.
STATUS:  COMPLETED

6/04/01 1900 to 2000 GMT.  EBS TT # ECTHOU000019610.  CM # 3556.  Scheduled
maintenance by EBS personnel in Boston, MA to configure equipment.  No downtime
is expected.
STATUS:  COMPLETED

6/04/01 1930 GMT.  EBS TT # ECTHOU000019667.  CM # 3569.  Scheduled maintenance
by EBS personnel in Houston, TX to configure equipment.  No downtime is
expected.
STATUS:  COMPLETED


Sorry for losing my cool with you earlier.  I have had a difficult few weeks
with some people in your group and took some of my frustration with them out
on you.  Thanks for your help and thanks for not ripping on me too hard.
Hope you have a good weekend.
PL


Here is EPSA's "Fact Sheet" on California.  We're discussing it at the EPSA
power marketers' weekly conference call tomorrow.  We're also considering
having EPSA submit this Fact Sheet to the CPUC  in response to the data
requests sent by the CPUC (responses are due on Friday).  If you have any
comments or suggested changes, please let me know (as soon as possible) in
case EPSA submits this paper to the CPUC.

Thanks

Sarah
---------------------- Forwarded by Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron on 09/05/2000
03:30 PM ---------------------------

"Jackie Gallagher" <JGallagher@epsa.org> on 08/30/2000 01:20:16 PM
To: <bhawkin@enron.com>, <bmerola@enron.com>, <christi.l.nicolay@enron.com>,
<janelle.scheuer@enron.com>, <jhartso@enron.com>, <mary.hain@enron.com>,
<sarah.novosel@enron.com>, <tom.hoatson@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: California "Fact Sheet"

MEMORANDUM

TO: Regulatory Affairs Committee
       Power Marketing Working Group

FROM: Donald Santa, Regulatory Affairs Committee Chair
            Joe Hartsoe, Power Marketing Working Group Chair
            Julie Simon, Vice President of Policy

DATE: August 30, 2000

RE: California "Fact Sheet"

At our meetings last week with FERC, we had a great deal of valuable factual
information and policy suggestions, but they were not pulled together as a
cohesive story.  Based on materials provided by various companies, we have
drafted the attached fact sheet entitled "California: The Real Story."  It is
an effort to pull together the most compelling pieces of information and
policy arguments as a "leave-behind" for FERC staff and other regulators and
to form the basis for any testimony at the upcoming congressional hearings.

The paper includes factual information pulled from a number of sources and
Jackie Gallagher, EPSA's Research Assistant, is attempting to verify and cite
as many facts as possible.  To make the message convincing, we need "chapter
and verse" on our facts.  Please review the material carefully to be sure it
is accurate and compelling.  Any assistance in verifying these facts, or
providing others that do a better job of telling our story, will be
appreciated.  You can e-mail to Jackie at jgallagher@epsa.org.

We will discuss the paper during our conference call next Wednesday,
September 6 at 11:00 a.m. (EDT).  To access the call, dial 1-800-937-6563 and
ask for the Julie Simon/EPSA call.  If you have any questions or suggestions
before Wednesday, please contact Julie Simon at 202-789-7200.

Attachment

Jacqueline Gallagher
Research/Policy Assistant
Electric Power Supply Association
1401 H Street, NW
Suite 760
Washington, DC  20005
202.789.7200
202.789.7201
jgallagher@epsa.org

 - CALIFORNIA2.doc


I'm in on Calpine.  Just bought.


Williams Communications Forms Bandwidth Trading Grp
Friday, February 11, 2000 12:50 PM

	?Mail this article to a friend

	By Michael Rieke
	HOUSTON (Dow Jones)--Williams Communications Group Inc. (WCG, news, msgs) has
formed a bandwidth trading group in a step toward embracing standardized
bandwidth trading.
	The company was initially opposed to the idea of bandwidth trading as a
commodity under standard terms and conditions, so its change of opinion is
being viewed by analysts as a key step toward creating a commodity market for
telecommunications bandwidth.
	Williams Communications now wants to be a leader in setting industry
standards for bandwidth trading, Gordon Martin, president of Williams
Communications' carrier services, told Dow Jones Newswires.
	The company plans to draw on the commodity trading experience of Williams Co.
(WMB, news, msgs), Martin said. Williams Co., an energy company that owns 85%
of Williams Communications, has been trading energy commodities such as
natural gas for years.
	Williams Communications has named Sharon Crow as vice president of bandwidth
risk and optimization management. She was previously a gas trader and risk
manager with Williams Energy Services, a unit of Williams Co.
	Williams Communications has one of the largest interstate telecommunications
networks in the United States. It has recently been adding more
telecommunications fiber on both the local and international level, Martin
said.

	"This is a market that may not be at a maturity level that others would like
to think it is in terms of ability to trade," Martin said.
	That's a clear reference to Enron Corp., which proposed last year that
bandwidth be traded as a commodity under standard terms and conditions. Enron
did the first such trade in December, agreeing to buy DS-3 bandwidth from New
York and Los Angeles in monthly increments from Global Crossing Ltd. (GBLX,
news, msgs). A DS-3 fiber moves data at a rate of 45 megabits per second.
	Tom Gros, vice president of global bandwidth trading for Enron, said he
welcomes Williams to the bandwidth trading market. "This is something that
enables all of us to more effectively manage our bandwidth and offer more
innovative solutions to our clients."
	Williams Communications' Martin is quick to point out that his company has
been trading bandwidth for about 15 years.
	Those deals have typically been long term, as long as 15 to 20 years.
Traditional bandwidth deals take weeks or even months to close as companies
negotiate quantity, price, quality of service, creditworthiness, damages for
non-performance and other issues. Each new deal would start again from
scratch to negotiate those issues.
	By setting standard terms and conditions to cover such issues, industry
players can trade bandwidth more quickly and more efficiently, Crow said.
	The resulting liquidity will add flexibility to the telecommunications
industry, allowing producers and users of bandwidth to manage risk. Crow said
Williams Communications wants to take the lead in forming a
telecommunications industry committee to standardize terms for bandwidth
trading.

	That's an about-face for Williams Communications. Last May a company official
was quoted as saying that bandwidth couldn't trade as a commodity under
standard terms and conditions.
	Last December another company official spoke at a bandwidth trading
conference in New York City. He was still skeptical but softened the
company's opposition to the idea.
	Crow said Williams Communications and Williams Co. have had a committee
studying the bandwidth trading idea for more than a year.
	The group was looking at the issue from a timing perspective to see how long
it would take to become liquid. Now Williams Communications wants to help
spur that liquidity.
	Part of Williams Communications change of opinion has had to do with the
evolution of Enron's trading proposal. It was originally seen by Williams as
a proposal to trade minutes of long distance telephony minutes, said a
Williams official who didn't want to be identified. Later it evolved into
trading of high-speed data transmission bandwidth.
	It's also become evident this year that the stock market likes the bandwidth
trading idea. Before Enron did its first bandwidth trade in early December,
its share price was less than $38 a share. Then mutual funds came in to buy
large blocks of stock in December, pushing the share price above the $50
mark.
	The share price got another shot in the arm when Enron played up bandwidth
trading and its fiber-optic network at its analysts meeting Jan. 20. On Jan.
19, Enron's stock closed at $53.50 a share. On the day of the analysts
meeting, it closed at $67.38. The next day it closed at $71.63.
	The market's reaction to Enron's bandwidth position "did invigorate our
examination of the issue," said the Williams Communication official.
	"The market had shown a willingness to reward the kind of capability we
believe we had but that we hadn't brought this kind of focus to," he said.
	All the Williams Communications officials stressed that a liquid market in
bandwidth would enable the company to manage risk for itself and for its
customers.
	Under the traditional long-term deals, a bandwidth consumer has to buy enough
bandwidth to handle its maximum needs. It continues to pay for all the
bandwidth even if it's using only part of it at times. A liquid market would
allow a consumer to more closely match its bandwidth purchases with its
needs.
	Williams hopes to be pushing liquidity in certain aspects of trading, like
monthly deals instead of only multi-year deals, said a company official.
	The more bandwidth trades, the more buyers and sellers learn about the value
of individual telecommunications products, he said.
	Crow said the company is still working on an "action plan" to put together
its trading group. It could draft employees from the Williams Communications
long-term trading and deal organization group, the Williams Co. energy
commodity trading group and from outside the company.
	As for organizing an industry group to set standards for bandwidth trading,
she said that could be as simple as calling other telecommunication carriers.


All:  I received another call from Gary Ordway asking for an ISDA and our
GTC's.  Has anyone ever done credit?  Sara
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 09/26/2000 11:22 AM -----

	Sara Shackleton
	05/23/2000 01:19 PM

		 To: Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rod Nelson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tracy Ngo/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Pacificorp Power Marketing ("PPM")

All:  I received a phone call from Gary Ordway asking when he could receive
draft documentation.  Has anyone prepared credit?  Thanks.  Sara
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 05/23/2000 01:17 PM -----

	Sara Shackleton
	05/10/2000 02:25 PM

		 To: Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rod Nelson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tracy Ngo/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Pacificorp Power Marketing ("PPM")

All:  I received a request from PPM to send our form of ISDA to document
trading.  We previously sent a draft to these guys on 1/13/99.  The only
difference is that they now want to trade and the Scottish Power acquisition
is done.  The contact is:

Gary Ordway
830 N.E. Holladay
Suite 200
Portland, Oregon  97232


You obviously forget the deafening tones of McMahon Stadium!!!!  Now that's
loud baby!!

Getting colder by the day up here....down into the low teens the last few
days, even had a bit of snow on the weekend.  Played hockey last night and
although it was my first time on skates in 6 months, I held up okay.  We
won 5-2.

Too bad about Notre Dame....I guess they're not the usual Irish powerhouse
this year?  Catch that Monday Nighter yesterday? (Skins/Cowboys).....didn't
think so......what a yawner.  Absolutely deplorable football.

Glad you didn't get me a Bagwell jersey, those bums couldn't do anything
against Brave pitching!  I just hope the Mariners come out of it all.....

I'm going home....more tomorrow.  We miss you too.....Scotty's not too big
on going to watch football.....


Start Date: 12/17/01; HourAhead hour: 2;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001121702.txt


Murray and Chris,

Here is an update on what has been completed and what needs to be completed:

First, I moved the Excel "mock up" to P:\VolumeManagement\Settlement Stats

I added Murray's corrections and re-constructed the Mock Report.

In the same directory, you will find an Access Database, "Settlement Analysis DB"  I created a table and a report and a form to create a report.

There is a hard copy of the report at my desk.

The various connections need to established, and I took a first shot at where the information is stored on the Oracle database.  The reports that I believe will populate the table are FSP_SETLMT_HISTORY_HDRS & FSP_SETLMT_HIST_DTL_QTY .  I have taken a shot at what fields I believe these come from relate to the table.

I need help in populating the tables and then some coaching on how to create a "program" feel to create a report based on selection criteria.

We can meet tomorrow to review where my work is.

Jim


Ralph Reed--get back to him
(second week of Oct)


This request has been pending your approval for  2 days.  Please click http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000080512&Page=Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000080512
Request Create Date : 1/7/02 5:01:54 PM
Requested For       : stephen.benchluch@enron.com
Resource Name       : Market Data Kobra Power
Resource Type       : Applications


Dr. Kaminski,

Sorry for the late response,
it took me some time to coordinate things.
Finally, it's almost dont :-)
It turned out that from June to August
will be best for me for work at ENRON
(Say June.4 to August.4)

But I still need to know several things from your side.
Could you answer following questions?

First:
Is my suggested working period is OK with you?
If so, let me know what to do for settlement
during the period.

Second:
I got a list of work, I might be able to do for
DealBench team from Ross and Suresh.
I'd like to know it is still a valid work list:
The list he sent is as following:

> 1.  Write a paper in layman's terms that answers
> questions like the following:
> Benefits of auctioning online for both buyers and
> sellers, particularly in reverse auctions
> Explanation how multi-variable auctions are not
> as efficient as price-only auctions (is this true?)
> How many participants are recommended for a
> successful live auction
> What types of goods and services are best suited
> for live auctions versus sealed bid quotes
> Opinions on lotting strategies
> Trends in online private auctions

> 2.  Identify appropriate recent auction research (3
> or 4 papers out of the 90+ you provided)and obtain approvals from the
> authors to post on our site

> 3. Create a list/bibiliography of relevant auction
> literature (with hyperlinks?)

> 4.  Would you be willing to offer auction consulting
> services to our customers (if they are interested)

Third:
There is an e-procurement forum at Haas School of business,
in May 22. The chair of the forum is my advisor Prof. Arie Segev.
A person from Wells Fargo Bank will talk about Wells Fargo's role
in e-marketplace payment initiative,
where ENRON broadband services is also one of key players
along with Citibank.
He asked me whether you can contact a person at
ENRON broadband services, who's related to the initiative.
He wants to know whether we will have a speaker from ENRON
to see ENRON's perspective, in the Forum.

Here is a link to news related to the initiative,

http://www.internetweek.com/story/INW20000808S0001

Fourth:
My advisor wants to know whether
there could be any opportunity to do a case study,
regarding ENRON's business.
He is interested in e-procurement and e-marketplaces.
Business model and System architecture...

Thanks for reading this long email.
I'll look forward to your answer..
I am sorry for giving you so much burden
to answer those questions possibly not easy to answer.

Warm regards,
Jinbaek

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jinbaek Kim
Ph.D Candidate
Dept. of Industrial Engineering and Operations Research
U.C.Berkeley
http://www.ieor.berkeley.edu/~jinbaek

Go Bears!

      :"'._..---.._.'";       `.             .'       .'           `.
     :      a   a      :                 __....._
     :     _.-0-._     :---'""'"-....--'"        '.
      :  .'   :   `.  :                          `,`.
       `.: '--'--' :.'                             ; ;
        : `._`-'_.'                                ;.'
        `.   '"'                                   ;
         `.               '                        ;
          `.     `        :           `            ;
           .`.    ;       ;           :           ;
         .'    `-.'      ;            :          ;`.
     __.'      .'      .'              :        ;   `.
   .'      __.'      .'`--..__      _._.'      ;      ;
   `......'        .'         `'""'`.'        ;......-'
         `.......-'                 `........'

On Mon, 5 Mar 2001 Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com wrote:

>
> Jinbaek,
>
> This is fine though you are welcome to spend more
> time with us this summer.
>
> Vince
>
>
>
>
>
> Jinbaek Kim <jinbaek@ieor.berkeley.edu> on 03/04/2001 03:45:40 PM
>
> To:   Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
> cc:
> Subject:  Re: Summer internship
>
>
> Dr. Kaminski,
>
> Thanks for your answer.
> Before I tell you the time frame,
> I'll need to talk with my advisor, first.
> Because here is an on-going-project.
> I need to coordinate the schedule.
>
> I'll appreciate it if you understand my situation,
> and give me some time (less than a week, of course).
>
> For your reference,
> probably
> the dates I'd like to ask you will be
> from mid-May to mid-July (2 months)
>
> Warm regards,
> Jinbaek
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Jinbaek Kim
> Ph.D Candidate
> Dept. of Industrial Engineering and Operations Research
> U.C.Berkeley
> http://www.ieor.berkeley.edu/~jinbaek
>
> Go Bears!
>
>       :"'._..---.._.'";       `.             .'       .'           `.
>      :      a   a      :                 __....._
>      :     _.-0-._     :---'""'"-....--'"        '.
>       :  .'   :   `.  :                          `,`.
>        `.: '--'--' :.'                             ; ;
>         : `._`-'_.'                                ;.'
>         `.   '"'                                   ;
>          `.               '                        ;
>           `.     `        :           `            ;
>            .`.    ;       ;           :           ;
>          .'    `-.'      ;            :          ;`.
>      __.'      .'      .'              :        ;   `.
>    .'      __.'      .'`--..__      _._.'      ;      ;
>    `......'        .'         `'""'`.'        ;......-'
>          `.......-'                 `........'
>
>
> On Fri, 2 Mar 2001 Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com wrote:
>
> >
> > Jinbaek,
> >
> > You can coordinate the details with me.
> > Let me know what the time frame is for you
> > and we shall send you an appropriate offer.
> >
> > Vince
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Jinbaek Kim <jinbaek@ieor.berkeley.edu> on 03/02/2001 04:43:06 PM
> >
> > To:   Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
> > cc:
> > Subject:  Re: Summer internship
> >
> >
> > Dr. Kaminski,
> >
> > Thank you very much.
> > Of course, I'll be happy to have an opportunity
> > to work at such a wonderful company.
> > I was contacting with Surech Raghavan at Deal Bench team,
> > and was going to express my appreciation to you again
> > after settling down process with them.
> >
> > For the period of working,
> > I still need to coordinate with my advisor and
> > may need to adjust according to that.
> > but anyway, I'll try to coordinate smoothly.
> >
> > Please let me know whether I should keep contacting
> > with Deal Bench team,
> > for working period and
> > for misc. living support such as finding a place, rent a car, etc.
> >
> > I appreciate you so much again,
> > for arranging such meetings and giving me an opportunity.
> > All this opportunity will not be available to me,
> > without your kind help.
> >
> > Warm Regards,
> > Jinbaek
> >
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Jinbaek Kim
> > Ph.D Candidate
> > Dept. of Industrial Engineering and Operations Research
> > U.C.Berkeley
> > http://www.ieor.berkeley.edu/~jinbaek
> >
> > Go Bears!
> >
> >       :"'._..---.._.'";       `.             .'       .'           `.
> >      :      a   a      :                 __....._
> >      :     _.-0-._     :---'""'"-....--'"        '.
> >       :  .'   :   `.  :                          `,`.
> >        `.: '--'--' :.'                             ; ;
> >         : `._`-'_.'                                ;.'
> >         `.   '"'                                   ;
> >          `.               '                        ;
> >           `.     `        :           `            ;
> >            .`.    ;       ;           :           ;
> >          .'    `-.'      ;            :          ;`.
> >      __.'      .'      .'              :        ;   `.
> >    .'      __.'      .'`--..__      _._.'      ;      ;
> >    `......'        .'         `'""'`.'        ;......-'
> >          `.......-'                 `........'
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 2 Mar 2001 Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Sorry for a delay in getting back to you.
> > > We would like very much to offer you a summer internship.
> > >
> > > Please, let me know if you are interested.
> > >
> > > Vince Kaminski
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 01/21/2001 10:29 AM -----

	"Katie Kaplan" <kaplan@iepa.com>
	01/19/2001 04:45 PM
	Please respond to kaplan

		 To: "IEP" <iepa@iepa.com>, "John Stout" <John_H_Stout@reliantenergy.com>,
"'Mark Smith'" <Mark.J.Smith@fpl.com>, "'Bill Carlson'" <wcarlson@wm.com>,
"'Bill Woods'" <billw@calpine.com>, "'Bob Escalante'"
<rescalante@riobravo-gm.com>, "'Carolyn Baker'" <cabaker@duke-energy.com>,
"'Cody Carter'" <cody.carter@williams.com>, "'Curt Hatton'"
<curt.hatton@gen.pge.com>, "'Dean Gosselin'" <dean_gosselin@fpl.com>, "'Doug
Fernley'" <fernley.doug@epenergy.com>, "'Doug Levitt'" <SDL@calwind.com>,
"'Duane Nelsen'" <dnelsen@gwfpower.com>, "'Ed Maddox'"
<emaddox@seawestwindpower.com>, "'Ed Tomeo'" <ed.tomeo@uaecorp.com>, "'Eric
Eisenman'" <eric.eisenman@neg.pge.com>, "'Frank Misseldine'"
<fmisseldine@caithnessenergy.com>, "'Greg Blue'" <gtbl@dynegy.com>, "'Hap
Boyd'" <hap.boyd@enron.com>, "'Jack Pigott'" <jackp@calpine.com>, "'Jeff
Dasovich'" <jdasovic@enron.com>, "'Joe Greco'" <joe.greco@uaecorp.com>, "'Joe
Ronan'" <joer@calpine.com>, "'Jonathan Weisgall'" <jweisgall@aol.com>, "'Ken
Hoffman'" <khoffman@caithnessenergy.com>, "'Kent Palmerton'"
<kent.palmerton@williams.com>, "'Lucian Fox'" <lucian_fox@ogden-energy.com>,
"'Marty McFadden'" <marty_mcfadden@ogden-energy.com>, "'Milton Schultz'"
<bfpjv@c-zone.net>, "'Nam Nguyen'" <nam.nguyen@powersrc.com>, "'Paul Wood'"
<paul_wood@ogden-energy.com>, "'Paula Soos'" <paula_soos@ogden-energy.com>,
"'Pete Levitt'" <Pete@calwind.com>, "'Rich Dyer'"
<Rich_dyer@ogden-energy.com>, "'Rob Lamkin'" <rllamkin@seiworldwide.com>,
"'Robert Frees'" <freesrj@apci.com>, "'Roger Pelote'"
<roger.pelote@williams.com>, "'Ross Ain'" <ain@worldnet.att.net>, "'Steve
Iliff'" <siliff@riobravo-gm.com>, "'Steve Ponder'" <steve_ponder@fpl.com>,
"'Sue Mara'" <smara@ect.enron.com>, "'Ted Cortopassi'"
<TCortopassi@ogden-energy.com>, "'Tom Heller'" <hellertj@apci.com>, "'Tony
Wetzel'" <twetzel@thermoecotek.com>, "'Ward Scobee'"
<wscobee@caithnessenergy.com>, "'William Hall'" <wfhall2@duke-energy.com>,
"Tom Ross" <tross@mcnallytemple.com>, "Susan Mccabe"
<sfmccabe@mindspring.com>, "Scott Govenar" <sgovenar@govadv.com>, "Ron Tom"
<Rtom@govadv.com>, "Robert Ross" <robbiz@cwo.com>, "Phil Isenberg"
<isenberg@HMOT.com>, "Norton Kelli" <knorton@mcnallytemple.com>, "Mike
Monagan" <mrmonagan@aol.com>, "McNally Ray" <rmcnally@mcnallytemple.com>,
"Maureen OHaren" <Oharen@HMOT.com>, "marie moretti" <marie_moretti@msn.com>,
"Katie Kaplan" <kaplan@iepa.com>, "Kassandra Gough" <kgough@calpine.com>,
"Julee Malinowski-Ball" <jmball@ns.net>, "John Larrea"
<john.g.larrea@williams.com>, "Jean Munoz" <jmunoz@mcnallytemple.com>, "Jan
Smutny-Jones" <smutny@iepa.com>, "Hedy Govenar" <hgovenar@acom2.com>, "DJ
Smith" <djsmith@smithandkempton.com>, "Delany Hunter"
<dhunter@smithandkempton.com>, "Chuck Cole" <ccole@advocation-inc.com>, "Anne
Kelly" <kelly@hnks.com>, "Theo Pahos" <tpahos@ppallc.com>, "Andy Brown"
<ABB@eslawfirm.com>, "B Brown Andy" <andybrwn@earthlink.net>, "Bob
Weisenmiller" <rbw@mrwassoc.com>, "Curtis Kebler"
<curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com>, "Douglas Kerner" <DKK@eslawfirm.com>,
"Jeff Dasovich" <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>, "Kristin Vellandi"
<kvellandi@pstrategies.com>, "Lynn Lednicky" <lale@dynegy.com>, "Marty
Wilson" <mwilson@pstrategies.com>, "Paula Hall-Collins"
<paula.hall-collins@williams.com>, "Richard Hyde" <rwhyde@duke-energy.com>,
"Stephanie-Newell" <stephanie-newell@reliantenergy.com>, "Sue Mara"
<smara@enron.com>
		 cc: "Steven Kelly" <steven@iepa.com>, "Carol H Hudson" <Chudson@iepa.com>
		 Subject: FW: CPUC Fastball: emergency meeting on 1/19

Greetings:

The CPUC held an emergency meeting this morning in which they restated the
utilities obligation to serve regardless of claims of bankruptcy or any other
insolvency. PG&E had indicated to both the ISO and CDWR that they had only
planned to schedule for load in which they had native generation to serve.
PG&E's logic is?probably that they will cover folks with the?assets they
have, but since they can't buy anything, they shouldn't?carry that
obligation.? CPUC doesn't like that logic, although if bankruptcy happens its
about the same effect?as?imposing that obligation on DWR.? This could be
avoided if they would just impose the rate increase?that will cover the
costs, subject to refund, and then get the long-term?deals in place.? At this
point the utilities have?much less to lose.? Please find the attached
decision.? For those of you who would like to listen to the hearing you can
listen to a rebroadcast by logging onto the CPUC web site.

?

?

Katie Kaplan

Manager of State Policy Affairs

Independent Energy Producers Association

(916) 448-9499

?
 - keep serving_4622.doc


Hi Sara, I have discovered quite a few long term deals that were done with
Enron Energy Services that have never been confirmed.  These trades were done
when the other group was confirming financial power deals.  I have created a
confirm for one of these deals.  Please look at the following and let me know
if you see anything that should be changed from a legal standpoint.  Then I
will continue to create the rest of them

Thanks for your help,
Melissa
3-1886


Thanks !!!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Williams, Jason R (Credit)
Sent:	Friday, August 24, 2001 4:13 PM
To:	Perlingiere, Debra; Espinoza, Veronica
Cc:	Nemec, Gerald
Subject:	RE: Cheynne / PSCO

Debra -

Sorry for the delay, but I haven't had a chance to pull these together yet.  I'll work on them over the weekend and send them to you.

JRW

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Perlingiere, Debra
Sent:	Friday, August 24, 2001 4:09 PM
To:	Espinoza, Veronica; Williams, Jason R (Credit)
Cc:	Nemec, Gerald
Subject:	Cheynne / PSCO

 Reminder to please send credit worksheets for Cheynne Public Service Colorado / Public Service Company of Colorado.

Thanks

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Legal
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron
713-853-7658
713-646-3490 Fax


Hi Jeff,

I'm preparing the letter agreement regarding payment.  Can you help me with
the name and address to use?

Thanks,

Kay


Dan,

Here are the daily average loads that will be put into the contract.


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 02/12/2001 03:38
PM ---------------------------

Ben F Jacoby@ECT
02/12/2001 02:38 PM
Sent by: Ben Jacoby@ECT
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rusty Stevens/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott
Healy/SF/ECT@ECT, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carlos
Sole/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON

Subject: Re: PSEG Request

Kay:

Please see my earlier response. We should use the AES Calvert doc form.

Kay Mann@ENRON
02/12/2001 01:57 PM
To: Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Rusty Stevens/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott Healy/SF/ECT@ECT, Ben
Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carlos Sole/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Re: PSEG Request

Fred,

Sounds "do able".  Please contemplate what would be acceptable as "outs" for
them and for us.  A,lso, will you be getting RAC involved soon since we are
contemplating a binding agreement in the near future?

My best guess is that the LOI will be prepared in house, but I will discuss
this with Carlos, and we will advise K & S of their role.

Thanks,

Kay

Fred Mitro@ECT
02/12/2001 01:48 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Rusty Stevens/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott Healy/SF/ECT@ECT, Ben
Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: PSEG Request

Kay:

I talked with PSEG this morning.  PSEG would like to negotiate and sign a
binding LOI regarding the Kendall project site in Illinois prior to
negotiating and executing the Definitive SPA.  The specifics of this LOI are:

 PSEG would pay an up-front $300,000 payment to ENA
 This payment would be non-refundable unless PSEG discovered a "fatal flaw"
in the project (we will have to carefully define this concept)
 The binding LOI would establish a date by which the SPA would be executed or
PSEG would forfeit the up-front payment
 The $2.7 MM balance of the Purchase Price would be due upon closing (signing
the SPA and transferring the member interests).

I believe that PSEG is getting nervous that we may close on the Kendall LLC
with another Buyer before they get their act together.

Call me to discuss the timing of drafting such an LOI.  I would like to
strike on PSEG while they are anxious and motivated.  My goal is to send the
LOI to PSEG by Wednesday of this week.  I can work directly with Carolyn if
that is the most efficient approach.

Fred


Dear Team--

	We are evaluating the potential sale of TW's existing 20-inch diameter Gomez lateral in Pecos and Ward County, Texas and have executed a confidentiality agreement with the proposed buyer (Pioneer Gas Pipeline).  The buyer would like to begin the due diligence process as early as possible and has asked to review  info related to the following:

	1) Maintenance records for last 3 years
	2) right-of-way / easement agreements

The potential benefits to TW of this transaction include 1) monetizing an asset that today is generating zero value and 2) creating a new source of gas supply into TW from the buyer.

Questions I have are:

	a) Can we designate a "point" person from the Monahans Team that I can coordinate with and who would that be?
	b) Where / who has the records & documents for the items above?

Your timely response is greatly appreciated.  Please coordinate with me all questions / concerns.  I ask that no information (verbal or written) be passed to any interested outside party without prior clearance with me.

thanks for your help!!  I can be reached in Houston at 713-853-5559.

Kevin Hyatt
Director, Asset Development


Found it.  It was buried beneath a stack.  Looks good.

I would add something to the effect that the appointment terminates if Ben
leaves the company's employment.

Thanks,

kay

Deb Korkmas@ECT
10/10/2000 02:37 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: Signature authority

Kay, I left the ENA draft for your review.  Was it acceptable?  If so, please
initial and I'll have circulated for signature and will draft the other
consents accordingly.  Thanks, Deb

Deb Korkmas
Enron North America Corp.
ENA Legal Dept.
1400 Smith Street, Room 3819
Houston, TX  77002
Phone:  713-853-5448
Fax:  713-646-3393

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	10/10/2000 02:29 PM

		 To: Deb Korkmas/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Signature authority

Deb,

Let's go ahead with POA's for Ben F. Jacoby for ENA, Tarheel Land
Development, Edgecombe Development, and Titan Land Development in accordance
with Janet's request and ENA standard practice. Deb, I have the impression
that this is something you typically handle, although I'm glad to volunteer
Kathleen for the task if that would help.

There will be other companies, but we can add these as we go.  Kathleen,
please advise if there are any which you see as most active at this time. For
instance, what are the names of the Florida development companies?

Your assistance is greatly appreciated, as Janet is eager to get this done.

Thanks,

Kay

---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 10/10/2000 02:20
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kay Mann                           10/08/2000 07:59 PM

To: Deb Korkmas/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Signature authority

Deb,

I'll get you the particulars, but you get the general idea. I'll have to
check on the expense account stuff.

Kathleen, you  haven't done any thing with this request yet, have you?  Could
you get the  names of the active development companies so that we can address
those, as well as ENA?

Thanks,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 10/08/2000 07:56
PM ---------------------------

Janet R Dietrich@ECT
10/08/2000 02:22 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Signature authority

Kay, as we discussed previously:

Effective immediately, I would like Ben Jacoby to have signature authority
for his team's expense reports as well as all documents whose capital
commitments are not greater than $250,000. Most documents will be
confidentiality agreements, exclusivity agreements, permit applications, and
land/equipment option agreements.

Please forward this (if need be) to the appropriate internal individuals who
get this set up. Thanks Kay.


I was just thinking about the anniversary thing, too.  I bought a book at
Barnes & Noble -- 100 Best Family Resorts in North America.  I found the name
of one place that I have seen in the past in magazines that I always thought
looked good - High Hampton Inn and Country Club in North Carolina.  Another
place that I have seen is something like Blackberry Farm in Tennessee.  Both
meet the criteria of mountains in the Carolina/Tennessee range.  I will get
info on both and we can look at it.  I worry a little bit about having such a
range of ages that I want to make sure that we go someplace where there is
plenty to do for all -- just sitting for some, shopping, eating, golf, etc.
These two places may be on the smaller side and may or may not offer enough
variety.  I thought that I would also get some info on some other places that
may not have popped up on Mom and Dad's list but that might be good for the
whole family.  One of those might catch their interest as well.

I can understand that with prolonged holiday exposure to Mom and Dad that the
thought of this trip could wear thin.  I would like the opportunity to be
together with everyone -- maybe we could send them on a nice dinner just the
two of them and the rest of us could have fun one night!  Even though Dad is
doing so much better, you never know when you will have the chance to get
everyone together on a trip like this.  Memory-maker or nightmare -- could be
a toss up, but maybe worth the try.  Let's share some research and see if
there is any place that we could get excited about going.

"Cindy White" <cwhite@viviance.com> on 01/05/2001 10:41:33 AM
To: "Sally" <sally.beck@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: anniversary

Hi, Sally,

Am sure you are swamped having been gone for a while...was glad to see OU
won the game--figured that made it a better trip for you!

Now that we know Dad will be around, shall we rev up the anniversary
planning again--or should we blow it off and do some great present--maybe
just send them somewhere?  Maybe it is just the increased holiday time with
them but Mom and Dad are kind of getting on my nerves right now....am sure
it will pass....

Cindy


----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 05/25/2000 03:23 PM -----

	Jarrod Cyprow
	05/24/2000 02:16 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Rand Whitney Collar

Sara,

I have attached draft Confirmation of a Collar with Rand Whitney. They want
to go live with this deal today and send out an executable Confirmation.
Tanya wants to put a provision in the confirmation that states that the deal
is subject to Credit approval. If we do not get credit approval Tanya will
kill the deal. I have left a message with Tanya asking her exactly what she
wants to say in the Confirmation. Please let me know what you think of the
Collar the way it is writtne and if we have any language to use for the
credit provision. I have a meeting at 3:00 an should be back at my desk by
4:00.

Thanks,

Jarrod

P.S. SITA? you were going to take a look at the governing law.


We will be continuing the Credit/Legal seminars on the following schedule.
Please add these dates to your calendars:

Session 3:  The Credit Support Annex and Paragraph 13
April 4 (Wednesday)
2:00 - 3:30 p.m.
EB49c3

Session 4:  The Credit Support Annex and Paragraph 13 (continued)
April 18 (Wednesday)
2:00 - 3:30 p.m.
EB49c3

Session 5:  The Credit Worksheet
May 2 (Wednesday)
2:00 - 3:30 p.m.
EB49c4

Session 6:  Letters of Credit, Guaranties and Equity Structures
May 16 (Wednesday)
2:00 - 3:30 p.m.
EB49c4

Session 7:  Higher Risk Counterparties, Early Termination, Master Netting
Issues and Canadian Issues
May 30 (Wednesday)
2:00 - 3:30 p.m.
EB49c4

A reminder e-mail will be sent a day or two before each session.


This is what transpired on yesterday's conference call regarding
Edison's legislative proposal:

Participants: NEV, Green Mountain, Utility.com, TURN, Reliant, Don
Fields

Rick Counnihan met with Edison and John White to discuss the proposal.
Edison discussed four issues which they would like to link to the public
goods charge extension which I have listed below.  These issues differ
from the original issues which Edison said we all took out of context.
According to Rick, John didn,t say much other than he wants to establish
emission standards for DG.

Public Goods Extension ) Edison would like to extend the charge but
change how money is allocated.

Maintain Wire Franchise ) Edison would like to own, operate and plan the
distribution system.  They believe there should be charges associated
with this, perhaps non-bypassable, but that that should be worked out by
the CPUC.  They also indicated that the utilities should no longer own
DG systems.

Procurement Charges ) Edison would like to procure energy wholesale from
a variety of sources, including the PX, and distribute with no mark-up
to their customers.

Revenue Cycle Services ) Edison believes the metering/billing area is
too contentious and they will not address it.  This does not mean the
unions won,t address it in exchange for supporting the public goods
extension which they oppose.

Edison said PG&E may want help with the irrigation districts who are
encroaching on their distribution system in exchange for support.  No
word on Sempra.  Edison was also confident that they could kill an
extension because so many people have problems with it including Rod
Wright
and the unions.

With respect to the coalition, it was agreed that each entity would
continue to take meetings and discuss the issue from their prospective.
We,d like to do so with John,s supprt but Rick will have to check with
him first.  We plan on having another conference call on Monday, March
13 at 4pm.

Scott Govenar


still on for lunch today??


I am definitely in.  Please let me know the details.  I am so sorry to hear this.  If you have Susie's address, can you send it to me?  Thanks,

Kim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Brewer, Stacey J.
Sent:	Wednesday, December 05, 2001 9:24 AM
To:	Sally Mcelroy (E-mail); Ward, Kim S (Houston); melissa reese (E-mail); Olinger, Kimberly S.
Subject:	Susie's father

Hello all,

	I am sorry to send this bad news.  Yesterday Susie's father had a massive coranary.  I took Susie home around 2:00 yesterday so that she could pack and take off to Louisianna.  It is my understanding as of right now that he is/was brain dead and they were going to pull the plug yesterday.  I am going to get the information and send flowers.  Do any of you want in?  Please let me know.  Thanks all, I hope to be the bearer of good news next time.  Stacey


remember these temps are at lower elevations so we can expect colder
---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 12/04/2000 11:13 AM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Eric Bass                           12/04/2000 11:13 AM

To: Shanna Husser/HOU/EES@EES, dfranklin@hanovermeasurement.com,
Jason.Bass2@COMPAQ.com, daphneco64@bigplanet.com, lwbthemarine@bigplanet.com
cc:
Subject: The coldest weather . . .

. . . in the US in the last five years and we will be in the mountains to
enjoy it.  Should be fun!!!   :-)

http://www.weather.com/weather/cities/us_co_telluride.html


1.  Need details re item 1  below.  Please suggest language (band of
acceptability, etc) which I will massage and incorporate.

6.  Do I have the latest draft of Marketing/Risk policies?

7. Bogey calc only addresses gas.  What if the fuel of choice is fuel oil?
Does the fuel cost and heat rate change?

Please point me to the defn of profit by cutting and pasting from wherever it
is.  I did  a quick search and couldn't find it, but I didn't do a page turn
to locate it.

Thanks,

Kay

From: Reagan Rorschach/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/24/2001 11:38 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: FW: Open items for MDEA

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Fairley, David
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 11:15 AM
To: Rorschach, Reagan
Subject: RE: Open items for MDEA

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Mann, Kay
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 5:06 PM
To: Rorschach, Reagan; Kroll, Heather; Fairley, David; May, Tom
Subject: Open items for MDEA

[Fairley, David]

Here are issues which I'm unclear about, all of which impact the drafting of
the agreement:

1. How are we setting the heat rate?  Do we have the GADS (?)?  Is it a daily
average, weekly average?  Flat rate? Adjusted? If so, how often?
[Fairley, David]
Each utility is obligated to provide the heat rate information to use in the
appropriate Exhibit and the Stack Model.  As conditions change the utilities
must update this info.  We are tracking heat rates based on actual fuel
usage.  Services and Orig agreed yesterday to add language that requires a
quarterly review of heat rate data to determine if the assumptions being used
are satisfactiry -- it can never be exact, but it should be accurate within a
band of acceptability.  No GADS.  Heat rates will be adjusted in the model as
often as necessary to account for significant changes such as hotter ambient
temps..

2. Are we comfortable that there are no permit restrictions?
[Fairley, David]
Yes, their units are too small.  We have discussed this with the customer,
and with our internal air permit guys.
[Rorschach, Reagan]  They have Title V permits, and they are faxing them to
us today.  They have no run hour limitations on gas, however, they are
limited on oil.  Will need to get that summary to Kay as soon as possible.

3. We have determined that we won't deal with fuel oil, right?
[Fairley, David]
We won't buy and sell fuel oil.  We may dispatch on oil at start-up, or we
may switch to oil and sell the gas if profitable, which constitutes a Product
transaction with the resulting profit split.
[Rorschach, Reagan]  We need to state that MDEA and Cities are responsible
for maintaining fuel oil supplies.

4. We aren't making money on gas, right?
[Fairley, David]
We make money on gas two ways.  The first is outside the contract, and is
basicly any internal profit on re-sale of gas to the Cities.  The second way
we can make money on gas is when the gas trade is in the form of a Product
trade, and those procedures apply.

5. Do we have a defn of costs that we like yet, and if so, how does it fit in
to the picture?
[Fairley, David]
Yes, will send separately.

6. Is there an up-to-date set of exhibits?
[Fairley, David]
The Marketing Strategy, the Trading and Risk Policy, and the Description of
Asset Management have been upated.  The other Exhibits have not been
modified.  The Marketing Strategy and Trading & Risk Policy have been
discussed at length with MDEA (MDEA commercial, not legal), and their
comments/questions incorporated.

7. It would help if theh commercial part of the team could send me the
following, in words and/or formulae:

The defn and method of establishing the bogey (target production cost)
formula can be an exhibit, which would be great for the commercial team to
work on.
[Fairley, David]
Thought we had this covered in the definitions and obligations of the
parties.  Will look at it again.  Conceptually, MDEA, Services Group, and
Orig are in full agreement, so we need to make sure that the contract
language is clear enough.
[Rorschach, Reagan]  See attached exhibit detailing the calc with an example.

 Are we determined how we should deal with imbalances (part of cost of
power)?
[Fairley, David]
There are three considerations on this: (1) who wears imbalance exposure?,
(2) who manages imbalances (hourly type activity), and (3) who pays for
imbalances?  Imbalances are billed by Entergy directly to MDEA under their
Network Services Agreement.  EPMI's hourly desk manages the load/resource
items hourly, but MDEA has the exposure (physical and price) to imbalances.
Weather/load changes, and fluctuations in supply create hourly imbalances
(they happen, they are uncontrollable, and we fix them) which EPMI's hourly
desk manages as part of the imbalance service described in the definitions
and obligations of the parties.  A different section in the contract states
that MDEA wears the exposure.

 How are we setting the bogey?    Formula?   [Fairley, David]  The bogey is
set when the load projection and stack models are run each day.  Both parties
participate by providing certain necessary info and discussing results and
planning the day's activities.
[Rorschach, Reagan]  Records of bogey decisions will be archieved

Subject to audit?  [Fairley, David]    Yes, but they would be auditing
something that is jointly derived each day.  Frankly, they would like to have
less involvement; ie, they trust us to do it all, but we are requiring them
to participate and buy in every day.

Two bogeys or one (gas and oil)?
[Fairley, David]
One bogey for power.  Gas is an input for determining the bogey.
[Rorschach, Reagan]  Bogey set day-ahead.

What is defn of profit?  I think I have the general idea, but a sentence or
two would be helpful as a reality check.
[Fairley, David]
This is in the pricing calc's.  Should we have a definition?

What costs are included on the buy and sell side [Fairley, David]  see cost
definition being provided separately.

Re stack model: a sentence or two describing what it is and how it is used.
[Fairley, David]    See definition in my mark-up's to the main agreement.

Updated exhibit on facilities, contracted resources, operating limits.
[Fairley, David]   Services and Orig are reviewing these, but other than what
was mentioned above, probably no changes unless you see a specific area that
is a problem.

What information does MDEA need for us to provide in order to split
costs/profits?  Are we clear that Cities buy gas, MDEA buys/sells power?
[Rorschach, Reagan]  I will be getting exhibits of the reporting both daily
and monthly.  We need to make sure to limit our info providing
responsibilities to those reports.

It would be great if I could get one set of answers to these
questions/issues, which has commercial buy in all around.

Thanks,

Kay


---------------------- Forwarded by Tom Acton/Corp/Enron on 05/23/2000 06:58
AM ---------------------------

Vance L Taylor@ECT
05/19/2000 11:09 AM
To: Tom Acton/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: June Wellhead Prod Est.

Tom,

Please see the attached file estimating wellhead production for the month of
June.  Please be advised that this is a preliminary estimate as I have yet to
meet with the gas buyers (the meeting is Monday at 2pm) and to this date we
have not received any noms for June.  I will update you with any revisions as
they occur.

Thanks,

vlt
x3-6353


Diana Spencer
11155 Roseland Road - 2
Sebastian, FL 3
dianas@macho.com

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

Diana Spencer


Hi Folks,
?
Just a few quick notes on this short Thanksgiving  week.
?
?
?
No Problems for Faulk / Kurt Warner  One more Week:? From USA Today's?Ram's
Page:? "In other  injury news, Marshall Faulk experienced no problems with
his right knee the day  after the game. Martz said quarterback Kurt Warner
almost certainly would miss  one more game before returning from a broken
little finger on his throwing hand.  Two pins were removed from Warner's
finger Monday and he'll throw Wednesday  through Friday in practice, but will
not take any snaps. ''(The doctors) want  him to have another week before
that hand is jarred by anything, just to make  sure it sets real well,''
Martz said.
?
It should be noted that Warner is more optimistic  about playing than his
coach is.? Don't take the coach's word as  gospel.? Remember, it was Martz
who?a few days ago?was saying  Faulk likely wouldn't play Monday night and if
he did, he'd be very  limited.? I'm not saying he's less than truthful.? I'm
saying these  things change.? If I had to guess though, I'd say it's one more
week of  Trent Green.
?
?
?
Tony Horne Out 6 Weeks:? From  USA Today: Tony Horne will be sidelined an
estimated six weeks with a ligament  damage to his left big toe. Coach Mike
Martz described the injury Tuesday as  ''severe turf toe.''? He'll likely be
replaced by CB Dre Bly.
?
?
Ray Crockett Hamstring:?  Denver CB Ray Crockett tore his hamstring Sunday.?
You may have seen it  when he went down and Ryan Leaf was able to hit Jeff
Graham for the long  TD.? It looked pretty bad.? I thought he'd dislocated
his hip the way  he pulled up.? Jimmy Spencer will fill in.?That hurts as the
team gets  ready for Seattle.? The Seahawks are no passing juggernaut but
neither were  the Chargers...
?
?
Mike Alstott Done? Tampa Bay  is calling Mike Alstott's knee injury a 3rd
degree sprain of the medial  collateral ligament (MCL) and he'll likely miss
6-8 weeks which of course means  he's done for FF purposes.? His leg is being
placed in a cast for 10  days.? Surgery doesn't look to be required and it's
a tough blow for the  big guy.? Look for more carries from Warrick Dunn.
?
?
Curtis Martin  Questions?? I've had a ton of requests for more info on the
Curtis Martin situation which is now being called a hip injury instead of a
lower back injury.? Coach Al Groh is being his usual guarded self with the
"if he plays he plays" type comments.? We'll know more here soon and will
shoot it to you.?
?
?
Scott Mitchell  Improving??? CBS Sportsline is reporting Scott  Mitchell's
sprained knee is improving.?? He's listed as doubtful but  is reportedly
making good progress.? With visions of Akili Smith in their  heads, I'm sure
he's getting lots of encouragement.? Seems weird to be  getting excited about
Scott Mitchell but the truth is he looked pretty good  Sunday.? His play was
great news for Peter Warrick fans.? He makes  Corey Dillon better too.
?
?
Jeff George to Start??  Coach Norv Turner said today that unless Brad
Johnson's knee is 100% healthy,  Jeff George would start.? Most reports are
that Johnson's knee is not 100%  yet.? One more great game from George and
this will be very  interesting.
?
?
Donald Hayes 50/50??  KFFL.com is reporting George Seifert said that WR
Donald Hayes is questionable  for this week's game with a bad groin.?RB
Tshimanga Biakabutuka is still  hobbled with a bad foot so the Panthers can
ill afford to lose Hayes  too.
?
?
James Stewart Hopeful??  KFFL.com is reporting: "James Stewart (hip pointer)
and Mario Bates (knee) were  wearing red jerseys during Monday's practice.
Red jerseys mean the players  aren't allowed to be hit. Lions head coach Gary
Moeller stated he thinks Stewart  will be able to play Thursday against the
Patriots.
?
?
?
These are just a few quick ones for you.?  We'll have our full blown Players
in the News Wednesday night.? See you  then.
?
Joe

 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
cheatsheets-unsubscribe@egroups.com


Please coordinate with Jane on this.  Mark
----- Forwarded by Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT on 01/16/2001 01:26 PM -----

	Jane McBride@ENRON
	01/14/2001 06:55 PM

		 To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: ISDA Electronic Document Available

Dear Mark,

As per this letter from Bob Pickel, I wonder if you (assuming you are Enron's
"Primary ISDA contact") would be able to send me our Firm ID and password
when you have a chance so that I can access the online versions of the
documents.

Thanks very much and thanks for the card.  Hoping you and your family had a
happy holiday and wishing you all the best for 2001.

Jane McBride

----- Forwarded by Jane McBride/AP/Enron on 2001/01/15 09:50 -----

	"ISDA" <cgreasley@isda.org>
	2001/01/13 12:18
	Please respond to cgreasley

		 To: jane.mcbride@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: ISDA Electronic Document Available

 - cover- non pcs.doc


This is the schedule that was sent to gas control.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Schoolcraft, Darrell
Sent:	Monday, September 03, 2001 7:54 AM
To:	DL-ETS Gas Controllers; Giambrone, Laura; Hernandez, Bert; McEvoy, Christine; Miller, Beverly; Minter, Tracy; Mulligan, Amy; Ward, Linda
Subject:	FW: Revision #1 - Griffith Gas & Electric Estimate - Monday Sept. 3, HE 8:00 AM to Tuesday Sept. 4, HE 7:00 AM

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Kenneth G Gruhl" <kggruhl@duke-energy.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Kenneth+20G+20Gruhl+22+20+3Ckggruhl+40duke-energy+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Friday, August 31, 2001 8:51 PM
To:	Mulligan, Amy; Allen K Nielsen; blreese@duke-energy.com; Beck Mayberry; wralkema@pplmt.com; Christopher S Smart; dacluff@duke-energy.com; dlsmith@pplweb.com; dtedesco@duke-energy.com; Schoolcraft, Darrell; Darren Stephens; David Bowers; David P Pell; George X Ouzounian; jjbischoff@pplweb.com; jmtaggart@duke-energy.com; jpritchard@citlink.net; James Stebbins; kglenny@duke-energy.com; Kim White; mschneider@duke-energy.com; Michael Kerr; Michael Wells; rjnewson@duke-energy.com; rspear@pplmt.com; Sherry Davis; Steven Fliflet; Steven Fliflet; Ted Romo; Todd Hendricks; Tom Carlson; Tyler J Kristensen; ajreiter@duke-energy.com; kggruhl@duke-energy.com; pattersondw@bv.com; swansondj@bv.com; trading@pplmt.com
Cc:	kengruhl@citlink.net
Subject:	Revision #1 - Griffith Gas & Electric Estimate - Monday Sept. 3, HE 8:00 AM to Tuesday Sept. 4, HE 7:00 AM

(Embedded image moved to file: pic01588.pcx)
 - pic01588.pcx


----- Forwarded by Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT on 12/11/2000 04:11 PM -----

	Leslie Hansen
	12/04/2000 12:31 PM

		 To: Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: JMansfield@anpower.com, Rhonda L Denton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: ANP Marketing Company

Please open ANP Marketing Company up to trade US power pursuant to the
on-line GTCs, pending credit approval.  As we discussed, if credit has not
yet approved this counterparty for on-line trading, please let Jeff Mansfield
of ANP know and give him a credit contact.

Thanks so much,

Leslie


Raquel Guzman, the lawyer for the referenced counterparty called again, and
she is going on vacation next week and wants to get that ETA finalized so
they can start trading when she's out.  She seems to feel the way the ETA is
written that they are responsible for all unauthorized use of the password,
including hackers into the system, and wants the language limited to use
caused by their fault or negligence.  Can you call her at 215/684-6630.
Thanks.


FYI.


?

?

?Please find attached draft testimony of (1) the Open Season process and (2)
benefits to California production, sponsored by Indicated Producers in the
GIR Proceeding.? We are continuing to refine the drafts and look forward to
receiving your comments.? Please include Christine Jun and Amie King in your
replies:? chj@aelaw.com and ack@aelaw.com.??

?

??????????? Evie Elsesser

?

?
 - Open Season Testimony 042800.doc
 - CA Production Testimony 042800.doc


Hi Dave.  As a follow up to out conversation, I found out Robert Rauschenburg
will be here April 5 or 6 and the weekend (April 7-8).  See how that looks on
the calendar for y'all yankees to visit down here in rodeoland.  (I did go to
the rodeo last night--hosted a big party--and wore my boots, and a cowboy hat
my group gave me--pictures to follow)
Can you believe I went to the Rodeo?

Jeff "J. R." Shankdaddy


Attached is the "updated" version of the Operations Integration Issues list for the Houston/Portland office.

Christina Valdez
Enron Net Works LLC
Phone - 713.853-9106
Fax     - 713.345.8100
christina.valdez@enron.com


Please change the demand fee for May 2001 on deal 384258 from $2,069,556.32 to $2,026,347.17.  The Williams supply was less than what the spreadsheet calculated.

Thanks,
Megan


Thanx...

Laura
Laura Luce


Just heads - I am sending out a more dtailed update to the larger group later today
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


We need to have a meeting regarding version 3.

Let me know when you have time?
I dont want a 10 person meeting. Just you and myself.

geof


I am surprised that the tax people would be ok with the suggested EOL fix.  My understanding was that if the assignment to ENA from ECTRIC happens automatically, that is equivalent -- for tax purposes -- to the UK trader binding ENA and results in bad tax consequences.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Sayre, Frank
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 12:09 PM
To:	Taylor, Mark E (Legal)
Subject:	FW: Trades as ENA
Importance:	High

Mark, oh master of EOL - Please see the attached documents forwarded to us from London.  My assumption is that the trades by the hedge funds on EOL will have to be with ECTRIC because of the way EOL is set up.  Is this assumption correct or is there any way to trade UK gas, UK electricity, Brent and metals on EOL directly through ENA?  Thanks, as always, for your input.  Frank

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Musch, Susan
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 11:48 AM
To:	Sayre, Frank
Subject:	FW: Trades as ENA
Importance:	High

Frank,

FYI, I just received this e-mail from Janine.  Have you already sorted out the structure with Robyn?  I would like to send an e-mail to Robyn, copying you and Janine with the summary of our discussions from yesterday.

What do you think about the proposed EnronOnline arrangement?

Best regards,
Susan

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Juggins, Janine
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 11:42 AM
To:	McKinney, Lara
Cc:	Musch, Susan
Subject:	FW: Trades as ENA

Lara,

a summary of what we just discussed

Hedge Funds wishing to trade with Enron both OTC and online for products not offered by ENA.

1. OTC transactions will be arranged by originators in the New York office and booked in the name of ENA, and then a transaction will be entered into between ENA and the relevant Enron affiliate (eg ECTRIC) to transfer the economic position to the relevant Enron affiliate.

2. Online transactions - see Justin's mail below. The suggestion would be that the Hedge Fund does the trade on EOL with the relevant Enron affiliate (eg ECTRIC). The trade then gets novated from Enron affiliate to ENA. A transaction is then entered into between ENA and Enron affiliate to transfer the economic position. We'll need to work at documentation and process to make this as smooth as possible.

REgards
Janine
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	White, Bill
Sent:	28 September 2001 13:22
To:	Boyd, Justin; Dyk, Russell; Shackleton, Sara; Shankman, Jeffrey A.
Cc:	Abramo, Caroline; Zivic, Robyn; Diamond, Daniel; Radous, Paul; Lebrocq, Wendi; Sharma, Shifali; Juggins, Janine; Nelson, Roderick
Subject:	RE: Trades as ENA

Justin,

Your solution appears to respond specifically to EOL related legal/credit issues.  However, isn't this only the tip of the iceberg?  What about non-EOL OTC trades conducted by ECTRIC traders with counterparties that want ENA as their counterparty.  From my time in London, it was always impressed upon me that there was a quagmire of additional tax and potential regulatory (SFA) issues.

Please comment.

Also, as a commercially efficient course of action, It has always seemed to me that we should attempt to "train" our couterparties to accept that ECTRIC is also a Enron Corp guaranteed sub (at least it was in the past, at their request) and somehow initially set up our contracts/ISDA to be inclusive of this vehicle.  Is this possible?  Otherwise, the permutations of various legal/credit/tax/regulatory hurdles for all manner of OTC trades becomes onerous.

Bill--

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Boyd, Justin
Sent:	28 September 2001 05:43
To:	Dyk, Russell; Shackleton, Sara; White, Bill; Shankman, Jeffrey A.
Cc:	Abramo, Caroline; Zivic, Robyn; Diamond, Daniel; Radous, Paul; Lebrocq, Wendi; Sharma, Shifali; Juggins, Janine; Nelson, Roderick
Subject:	RE: Trades as ENA

Russell

My view would be to follow the novation route, i.e.

1.	C/P trades via EOL with ECTRIC
2.	Each trade is novated from ECTRIC to ENA, and treated as concluded under ENA ISDA Master
3.	ENA enters into back-to-back trade with ECTRIC

This does mean that the C/P must initially accept the European EOL GTCs, though if we set up a mechanism whereby EOL trades are automatically novated to ENA and treated as concluded under the ENA ISDA Master, this effectively cancels out the EOL GTCs.

Justin

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dyk, Russell
Sent:	27 September 2001 23:38
To:	Shackleton, Sara; Boyd, Justin; White, Bill; Shankman, Jeffrey A.
Cc:	Abramo, Caroline; Zivic, Robyn; Diamond, Daniel; Radous, Paul; Lebrocq, Wendi; Sharma, Shifali
Subject:	FW: Trades as ENA

Everyone -

Our hedge fund group needs clarification on the issue of doing Brent and other European product deals w/ our hedge fund counterparties and booking them back to ENA, the entity with which all the funds have ISDAs. We just did two WTI/Brent crude oil spreads today, one w/ very large volume, and expect to be doing more such deals.

This is more than just a legal issue; it's going to impact credit and our strategy to get the funds trading on EOL as well.

As we understand it, the main legal issue is that all the funds have an ISDA only w/ ENA and not w/ ECTRIC, so they (and I assume we) want all deals and legal exposure to be w/ ENA. To satisfy both parties' desires, all European product deals must be booked from ECTRIC to ENA. Sara, from speaking to you and from Justin's response below, it seems to me that the only legal hurdle we, the funds, and our traders might face is if no trader w/ ENA in Houston okays w/ the counterparty on ENA's behalf. However, there seem to be 2 other solutions (a netting agreement and novating) that get around this. As Sara knows, dealing on legal agreements w/ the funds can be onerous and time-consuming; negotiating more paperwork is not a viable option.

From the credit side, as we understand it, the issue w/ not back-to-backing the trades w/ ENA is that the credit exposure will not be aggregated to the funds' net position in Houston and, therefore, not monitored. In other words, any exposure not sitting w/ ENA will be invisible to credit. so daily margining, etc. will  be incorrect.

From the EnronOnline side, as we see it there are a couple of issues. EOL wants the funds to trade online; an increasing number of funds also want to trade online. However, they do not want to be restricted to trading products that are only US based. Also, they would like to see more arb spread products like a WTI/Brent crude oil spread online. If neither desire can be easily met b/c we need a separate ISDA w/ ECTRIC (which potentially means, as above, more onerous and time-consuming negotiation), then it will certainly be detrimental for volume and also foresake a certain momentum that we are gaining now.

The point has been raised that the funds could trade European products if credit in London cleared them and if they were willing then to accept the general terms and conditions that pop up on EOL. We can assure you that they will not accept this.

These are the issues as we see them from the origination side. There may be other issues that we're missing from the sides that I've mentioned as well as the trading/back office side.
Regards,
Russ

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	White, Bill
Sent:	Thursday, September 27, 2001 3:32 PM
To:	Dyk, Russell
Subject:	FW: Trades as ENA

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Sharma, Shifali
Sent:	26 July 2001 08:21
To:	White, Bill
Subject:	FW: Trades as ENA

This is what we have heard from Legal and Tax so far.  We're trying to get a list of couterparties that currently will not trade with ECTRIC and only with ENA.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Boyd, Justin
Sent:	Thursday, July 26, 2001 2:10 AM
To:	Juggins, Janine; Beyhum, Maya
Cc:	Sharma, Shifali; Klar, Guenther; Sexton, Camille; Watt, Julie; Marsh, Jonathan
Subject:	RE: Trades as ENA

i agree - assuming you follow janine's approach, then no adverse UK regulatory issues will ensue

justin
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Juggins, Janine
Sent:	25 July 2001 19:29
To:	Beyhum, Maya; Boyd, Justin
Cc:	Sharma, Shifali; Klar, Guenther; Sexton, Camille; Watt, Julie
Subject:	RE: Trades as ENA

I assume that these are financial transactions. The current approach is the right one in the circumstances - i.e trade between ECTRIC and ENA, trade between ENA and third party (eg Bank of America). It is important that the trader agreeing to the deal with the third party in the name of ENA is located in Houston (they cannot agree deals in the name of ENA when located in London).  The pricing should be such that ENA is compensated for taking the credit risk with respect to the third party but otherwise all the economics should be with ECTRIC.

To avoid booking the back to back trades, a possibility would be an agreement on netting to be entered into by ECTRIC, ENA and Bank of America if all parties can get comfortable with the legal position.

Another alternative sometimes put forward is that ECTRIC does the deal with Bank of America, the contract is then novated from ECTRIC to ENA, and ENA enters into a back to back swap on the same financial terms with ECTRIC.

Note that we are currently working on a project to enter into financials through EFET LLC (arranged by EEFT) instead of ECTRIC (effective 1 November).

Regards
Janine

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Beyhum, Maya
Sent:	25 July 2001 14:13
To:	Juggins, Janine; Boyd, Justin
Cc:	Sharma, Shifali
Subject:	Trades as ENA

Hi

I am currently working in the London Risk group for Global Markets.

At the moment we have a number of counterparties who do not want to transact with ECTRIC but would like to do deals only with ENA (e.g. Bank of America). As a result, if a London trader wants to carry out a trade with Bank of America, he will do an internal trade with a trader in Houston and then book a trade between the Houston trader (who trades under ENA) and Bank Of America. The trades are then confirmed from the Houston office.

We were wondering about a couple of things:

Are there any tax/legal implications we should be aware of as a result of booking the trades as we do
Is there a way to approach these counterparties to get them to trade with ECTRIC (as this currently creates a lot of paperwork and administration)?

Thanks for your help
Maya


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 04/05/2001
01:15 PM ---------------------------

"James Love" <James.Love@msl.redstone.army.mil> on 04/05/2001 01:09:59 PM
To: <Phillip.M.Love@enron.com>, "Craig Langhauser"
<Craig.Langhauser@msl.redstone.army.mil>, "John Switzer"
<John.Switzer@msl.redstone.army.mil>, "Phil Hooper"
<Phil.Hooper@msl.redstone.army.mil>, "Phillip Roberts"
<Phillip.Roberts@msl.redstone.army.mil>, "Tracy Magnusson"
<Tracy.Magnusson@msl.redstone.army.mil>, <EDowling@quantum-intl.com>
cc:
Subject: Fwd: FW: Urgent!  Help find this girls father

Received: from postoffice.cniweb.net ([208.218.214.5]) by
msl.redstone.army.mil; Thu, 05 Apr 2001 13:08:10 -0500
Received: from drsoexchng.drsoptronics.com ([199.171.134.126])          by
postoffice.cniweb.net (Netscape Messaging Server 3.62)           with ESMTP
id 2221 for <james.love@msl.redstone.army.mil>;          Thu, 5 Apr 2001
14:02:39 -0400
Received: by drsoexchng.drsoptronics.com with Internet Mail Service
(5.5.2653.19) id <HZF9G4SD>; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 14:07:54 -0400
Message-ID:
<EFE4EFC2BBB89A4C9A712062FEAD5F0C0A832E@drsoexchng.drsoptronics.com>
From: "Hall, Joe" <joe_hall@DRSOptronics.com>
To:  "'james.love@msl.redstone.army.mil'" <james.love@msl.redstone.army.mil>
Subject: FW: Urgent!  Help find this girls father
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2001 14:07:53 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="----_=_NextPart_000_01C0BDFB.55770BC0"

-----Original Message-----
From: Voyles, Elizabeth [mailto:Elizabeth.Voyles-1@ksc.nasa.gov]
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 1:52 PM
To: 'Christina.Neilson@swpc.siemens.com'; 'Gargasz, Kelly'; 'Jorgensen,
Catherine'; 'Hall, Joe'
Subject: Urgent! Help find this girls father

> Everyday, thousands of children are abandoned by their biological fathers.
> These men leave the mothers without benefit of support. An ongoing effort
> is being made to locate these "deadbeat dads" and hold them accountable to
> these children.
>
> Attached is a photo of a child who desperately needs to locate one of
> these deadbeats. Your help is greatly appreciated.
>
>  <<Jessica (1).jpg>>
>
>
>

 - Jessica (1).jpg


Federal Caps Didn't Deter Higher Prices
Power: Cal-ISO study says suppliers continued to charge as much as five times more than the imposed limits.
By NANCY VOGEL
TIMES STAFF WRITER

July 27 2001

SACRAMENTO -- After federal regulators limited wholesale electricity prices last month, big private sellers of power in California continued to ask as much as five times more for electricity than the federal cap, according to a confidential study by state grid operators.

The analysis by the California Independent System Operator covers only the first week after the caps were imposed June 20. Cal-ISO has submitted the data to federal regulators for potential investigation. The report is a summary of what Cal-ISO calls possible anti-competitive behavior by Duke Energy, Williams Cos., Mirant Corp., Reliant Energy and Dynegy Corp.

"In a truly competitive market we would expect these suppliers to bid very close to their actual operating cost," said Greg Cook, senior policy analyst with Cal-ISO's Department of Market Analysis. The state did not necessarily purchase any power at the high prices being demanded. Instead, the significance of the bids is that they show how California could find itself paying exorbitant prices for electricity again if hot weather returns and conservation slackens, said Frank Wolak, a Stanford University economist who studies the California electricity market.

"The bottom line is that the generators are putting out these bids in expectation of high demand," he said. "If weather all of a sudden gets really hot from Southern to Northern California, the bids submitted by generators could be very costly to California."

Cal-ISO calculated the cost of production for each company based on the efficiency of its power plants and estimates of what each paid for natural gas to fuel the plants.

The average cost for the five was $105 per megawatt-hour, which closely matches the federal price limit in California, which now stands at $101 per megawatt-hour. According to the power bidding procedures, companies that bid at or below their cost of production often still get paid a higher price, allowing them to make a substantial profit.

On average, four of the five companies submitted bids either slightly below or slightly above their cost of production. But with the exception of Atlanta-based Mirant, each company at times submitted bids that were substantially higher. Houston-based Reliant, for example, bid as much as $540 per megawatt-hour, more than five times its estimated cost. Overall, Reliant's average bid was close to costs, according to the analysis.

Cal-ISO identified companies by code in its report. Sources familiar with the study identified the companies for The Times.

The Cal-ISO report singled out "Supplier 5," identified by sources as Charlotte, N.C.-based Duke Energy, saying the company "continues to bid significantly in excess of its operating costs."

Duke owns two large power plants on the central coast. It marked up its bids an average of 88% beyond its cost to produce electricity, according to the analysis. For example, it cost Duke $85 to $121 to generate a megawatt-hour of electricity in the time period studied, the report shows, but the company offered to sell a megawatt-hour from $149 to $195.

Duke spokesman Tom Williams on Thursday said, "The use of the data in some cases doesn't appear to add up and in all cases appears to be selective and could easily be misunderstood." Duke sells nearly the entire output of its power plants under long-term contracts, and not on the spot market, which the Cal-ISO report studied, he noted.

Reliant spokesman Richard Wheatley said, "We're looking at the data, and we question whether or not it is correct."

A combination of cool weather, heavy conservation, the start-up of new power plants and recently signed long-term power contracts that guarantee supplies have eased the state's electricity crisis in recent weeks.

Market prices that as recently as May averaged $271 per megawatt-hour have dropped to less than $100 per megawatt-hour.

The more abundant power supplies have freed grid operators to ignore higher-priced bids. But they will have to consider paying such prices to avoid blackouts if supplies tighten, Wolak said.

Such a scenario would test the effectiveness of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission order issued June 19, he said.

The bids of the five companies analyzed were offers of sales to Cal-ISO, a Folsom-based agency that manages the electrical transmission grid serving 75% of California. Cal-ISO buys power on short notice to smooth the flow on the state's electrical freeway and avert blackouts.

As California's fledgling market began to go haywire last fall, Cal-ISO workers struggled to purchase as much as 30% of the state's power demand with just hours to spare. Since then, the market has stabilized, and Cal-ISO's purchases now amount to roughly 5% of the electricity California consumes.

RELATED STORY

Power profits: Power plant operator Calpine said its quarterly profit more than doubled. C2
Copyright 2001, Los Angeles Times <http://www.latimes.com>

<!-- comment function report_error(msg, url, line) {     if (false)  alert(msg); } self.onerror = report_error; // --> <http://ads19.focalink.com/SmartBanner/defpage?649.93>

<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>


Attached are clean versions of the most up to date documents.  The confirm
also includes a redline copy with the changes we discussed this morning.

Please note that Calpine needs to execute the following documents:

1.  Capacity Release and Assignment Agreement
2.  Enfolio Master Firm Purchase/Sale Agreement
3.  Guaranty by Calpine Corporation (Included as Exhibit to Enfolio Master
Agreement)
4.  Transaction No. 1 to Enfolio (the Confirm)

Please let me know if you have any questions.


Dear John:
Thanks for you interest in Moroso products.  Your local dealer is Spazio in
Austin. Phone: 512-474-5768. They'll be able to help you.
Best regards, Mona, E Stoecklin Intl Furniture.


EMAZING Home[IMAGE]Edit Your ProfilePrivacy

		Advice and Living - Brain Candy - Business and Money - Comics - Daybreakers -
Entertainment
		Espaol - Games - Good Thoughts - Grapevine - Greetings - Health - Hobbies -
Horoscopes
		Household Hints - Kitchen - Music - Sports - Style - Technology - Travel -
Wireless

		[IMAGE]

		  LET YOUR LAPTOP COMPUTER CONNECT TO THE INTERNET WIRELESSLY
		Sign up today for the Sierra Aircard and connect to the Internet Anytime,
Anywhere.  Simply slip the Aircard into your PC slot and you,re connected.
Order today and save $100, plus our 2-week money back guarantee. Click  here
for more details.

		Internet Tip of the Day
		Thursday November 23, 2000

		Software Support

		The software you use almost certainly has online support, like FAQs, updates,
bug fixes, and tech support. There may be many other useful resources for
popular programs, however, like user groups, discussion groups, or even clubs
and organizations devoted to certain software. This is especially true of
large, complex programs used by professionals, like Photoshop, CAD modeling
software, and financial or business tools. Experienced users have lots of
tricks and shortcuts to share, and you can get quick answers to your
questions. Some users maintain Web sites for their advice and tutorials.
Developers sometimes post utilities, plug-ins and other extras that can make
your life easier. If you're trying to come to grips with some powerful but
complex software, open your favorite search engine and do a quick check.
You'll be on your way to becoming the expert yourself.

		- Dennis Ryan

		Email  this tip to a friend - Browse  the Archives

		Today's Science & Technology News:

		 Click  here to read more!
		[IMAGE]

		Tip Gift
		@Home Internet Service
		Surf faster! Click here to learn about the nation's #1 broadband Internet
service

		Book
		BOOK  OF THE DAY
		The Beatles: The Beatles Anthology

		CD
		CD  OF THE DAY
		U2: All That You Can't Leave Behind

		Gift
		 GIFT  OF THE DAY
		Pacific Cycle: Red Blitz Mini Scooter

		DVD
		MOVIE  OF THE DAY (DVD)
		Mel Gibson: Chicken Run

		VHS
		MOVIE  OF THE DAY (VHS)
		A Charlie Brown Christmas

		Misc
		E-greetings that are EMAZING!
		Easy, fun and FREE...EMAZING greetings are the cool way to say what you've
gotta say.

		Misc
		Holiday gift shopping made easy...
		It's Flooz!  The online gift currency you send by email!

		Misc
		 Win a FREE Sony Playstation 2 from Half.com!
		Every dollar spent at Half.com is an entry.  Easy holiday shopping is waiting
for you at our Holiday Gift Central!

		Gift
		Don't spend Christmas without the Grinch...
		Save up to 40% at Amazon's Dr. Seuss Shop!

		Misc
		You've made your decision.
		While you wait for the rest of the country to catch up, check out inDecision
2000 on the Grapevine.

		Misc
		 LET YOUR LAPTOP COMPUTER CONNECT TO THE INTERNET WIRELESSLY
		Sign up today for the Sierra Aircard and connect to the Internet Anytime,
Anywhere.
		QUOTE  OF THE DAY
		"No man who ever held the office of president would congratulate a friend on
obtaining it."
		- John Adams

		 [IMAGE]

		  Music is a way to escape the mundane world!
		And that's exactly what you can do with these FREE audio tips! Learn how to
take good care of your audio equipment, how to get the best sound for your
listening pleasure, or how to keep your mom from telling you to turn it down
(with the best headphones for your money)! Tune in to EMAZING's Audio Tip of
the Day! Click  here for more details.

		[IMAGE]
		?
		Advertise - Company Info - Feedback - Help - Jobs - Privacy Policy - Terms &
Conditions
		Archives - Edit Your Profile -?Unsubscribe

		EMAZING.com is a service of EMAZING, INC. Copyright 2000. All Rights Reserved.
		EMAZING.com - Whatever you're into, we email it to you. FREE!
[IMAGE]


fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 05/11/2001
03:59 PM ---------------------------

Linda Robertson
05/11/2001 03:16 PM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul
Kaufman/Enron@EnronXGate, bandrews@quinngillespie.com
cc: John Shelk/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: DeFazio

Here's what John found.  We will follow up with DeFazio.  He is extremely
liberal.   His credibility is highly linked to his highly liberal
positions.   Most pundits will see this for what it is, given the source.
But we will see him soon.
----- Forwarded by Linda Robertson/NA/Enron on 05/11/2001 04:12 PM -----

	John Shelk
	05/11/2001 04:11 PM

		 To: Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject:

DeFazio's proposal is on the first page of his website.

http://www.house.gov/defazio/index.htm