Dear Friends,

President-elect Bush has brought together an excellent group to serve as his
Cabinet.  His nominees are a diverse, experienced, and strong group.  They
will help enact his agenda, change the tone in Washington and make us proud.

Your help is needed to get these outstanding men and women confirmed by the
United States Senate.  Some of President-elect Bush's nominees are being
unfairly attacked by outside groups and the Senate needs to hear that from
you.

One of the first Senate hearings will be Tuesday for Senator John Ashcroft,
President-elect Bush's choice for Attorney General.

The hallmark of Senator Ashcroft's long history of public service has been
integrity.  As Attorney General, he will uphold the law and make the
Department of Justice an institution all Americans can be proud of.

He brings a unique record of service to this challenge.  He was twice
elected Missouri's Attorney General, serving with both Republican and
Democrat Governors.  He was elected Governor of Missouri, an important swing
state, and then reelected with 64% of the vote.  John then was elected to
the U.S. Senate, where he just finished a six-year term.  No other Attorney
General has ever had this wealth of experience.

John has a long history of strong leadership on important issues, including:

- Won widespread acclaim for his effectiveness in running the Missouri
Attorney General's office by attracting strong men and women to serve his
state and strictly upholding the law
- As Senator, co-Sponsored the Violence Against Women Act
- As Governor, signed Missouri's first Hate-Crimes Bill and fought to
protect victims' rights
- Balanced the State Budget all eight years As Governor
- Made Education Reform a priority as Governor
- Toughened penalties for crimes committed with a Gun
- Worked To protect children at school, strengthen classroom safety
- Voted For background checks at pawn shops
- Was Endorsed By Missouri Law Enforcement Agencies
- Supported 26 of 28 African-Americans nominated to the Federal bench
- Was commended as Governor by one of the oldest Black Bar Associations for
his record of appointing minorities
- Appointed many African-Americans to Missouri's courts
- Was one of the first Governors to sign a law creating a Martin Luther King
holiday
- Created an award honoring George Washington Carver's Accomplishments,
saved Lincoln College, an historic Black college founded by African-American
veterans of the Civil War.

Some groups are attacking Ashcroft for opposing the nomination of Judge
Ronnie White to a lifetime appointment as a Federal judge. Every Republican
Senator opposed White's confirmation, in part, because he urged a lower
legal standard for a man convicted of first-degree murder 4 times (including
the first degree murder of three police officers).

Some groups charge Ashcroft will not uphold abortion laws with which he
disagrees.  This is wrong and simply an attempt to undermine the new
Administration.  Ashcroft understands the job of the Attorney General is to
carry out the letter of the law.   He will restore the rule of law to the
Justice Department and run a highly professional department.

Please do two things.

First, let your Senator know you strongly support a fair confirmation
process for John Ashcroft.

Go to http://www.senate.gov/senators/senator_by_state.cfm to find the
contact information for the Senators from your state.

Second, let the members of the Senate Judiciary Committee know you support
John Ashcroft's confirmation.  The committee begins its hearings Tuesday.
Its members are: http://www.senate.gov/~judiciary/members.htm

D(DE) Biden Jr, Joseph, (202) 224-5042, senator@biden.senate.gov
R(OH) DeWine, Mike, (202) 224-2315,
http://www.senate.gov/~dewine/request_form.html
D(WI) Feingold, Russell, (202) 224-5323, russell_feingold@feingold.senate.gov
D(CA) Feinstein, Dianne, (202) 224-3841, senator@feinstein.senate.gov
R(IA) Grassley, Chuck,, (202) 224-3744, http://grassley.senate.gov/webform.htm
R(UT) Hatch, Orrin, (202) 224-5251, senator_hatch@hatch.senate.gov
D(MA) Kennedy, Edward, (202) 224-4543, senator@kennedy.senate.gov
D(WI) Kohl, Herb, (202) 224-5653, senator_kohl@kohl.senate.gov
R(AZ) Kyl, Jon, (202) 224-4521, info@kyl.senate.gov
D(VT) Leahy, Patrick, (202) 224-4242, senator_leahy@leahy.senate.gov
D(NY) Schumer, Charles, (202) 224-6542, senator@schumer.senate.gov
R(AL) Sessions, Jeff, (202) 224-4124, senator@sessions.senate.gov
R(NH) Smith, Bob, (202) 224-2841, opinion@smith.senate.gov
R(PA) Specter, Arlen, (202) 224-4254, http://specter.senate.gov/webform.htm
R(SC) Thurmond, Strom, (202) 224-5972, senator@thurmond.senate.gov
D(NJ) Torricelli, Robert, (202) 224-3224
senator_torricelli@torricelli.senate.gov

Finally, two recent comments from current United States Senators:

Senator Robert Torricelli (D-NJ) had this to say about the Ashcroft
nomination:

"'I think it represents a very good choice'. . . the only things people want
in an attorney general are 'good management, sound judgment and high
integrity.  They're not easy to find in one individual, but I think John
Ashcroft has all of them.'"  "I certainly assume I will be voting for
him."  - Sen. Robert Torricelli (D-NJ) (David Kocieniewski, "Staunch Democrat
Eases Up on Opposition," The New York Times, January 6, 2001; Audrey Hudson,
"Democrats Set For Ashcroft's Confirmation," The Washington Times, January
4, 2001) (emphasis added)

Senator Kent Conrad (D-ND) Commended Ashcroft.

"I rise to pay tribute to Senator John Ashcroft as he prepares to leave the
Senate. . . . Senator Ashcroft has been a man of his word who served his
state and his country with distinction.  I join my colleagues on both sides
of the aisle in wishing him well in his future endeavors."  (Congressional
Record, December 15, 2000)

Thank you.

(Please forward this message to friends, family and co-workers and ask them
to show their support for President-elect Bush by asking their U.S. Senators
to support the confirmation of John Ashcroft)

______________________________________________

Paid for by the Republican National Committee.

If you wish to unsubscribe from the eChampion mailing list, simply click
here:

http://mail.echampions2000.com/GoNow/a14064a29164a56615396a0

To become an eChampion click here:

http://mail.echampions2000.com/GoNow/a14064a29164a56615396a1


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Mims, Patrice L.
Sent:	Friday, September 28, 2001 10:24 AM
To:	Perlingiere, Debra
Subject:	RE: Assignment Agreement Kaztex, Nicor, Enron

I'm gathering the base contract as we speak, I'll get it to you asap!

Thanks

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Perlingiere, Debra
Sent:	Friday, September 28, 2001 9:46 AM
To:	Mims, Patrice L.
Subject:	RE: Assignment Agreement Kaztex, Nicor, Enron

I do not see any problems with the assignment however,  I want to look over the contract and the transactions before I give the ok  because I do not see the contract in our system.  Do you have a copy?

 dp
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mims, Patrice L.
Sent:	Friday, September 28, 2001 8:43 AM
To:	Perlingiere, Debra
Subject:	FW: Assignment Agreement Kaztex, Nicor, Enron
Importance:	High

Hey Debra,

Here is the assigment letter that we talked about--the deals that they want to assign from Kaztex to Nicor Energy are the following:
V17258.1
V17337.1
V17515.1

They want these contracts assigned to Nicor effective October 1st.  From my perspective, is there anything else I need to do, other than change the name on our documents,once you have approved the assigment agreement.

Thanks
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Pam Kirchhoff <PamKirchhoff@NicorEnergy.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Pam+20Kirchhoff+20+3CPamKirchhoff+40NicorEnergy+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Friday, September 28, 2001 8:18 AM
To:	Mims, Patrice L.
Subject:	Assignment Agreement Kaztex, Nicor, Enron
Importance:	High

Patrice,

Please call me asap if there are any concerns or questions regarding the
agreement.  If not, please sign and fax to 630-435-6400.

Thanks,
Pam

 <<Kaztek Assignment (Enron)  9.27.01.doc>>

 - Kaztek Assignment (Enron)  9.27.01.doc << File: Kaztek Assignment (Enron)  9.27.01.doc >>


Thought you might be interested.  Cuiaba is really taking a toll.

Regards,

Rob
---------------------- Forwarded by Rob G Gay/NA/Enron on 02/12/2001 09:45 AM
---------------------------

John Novak
02/12/2001 01:48 PM
To: Jose Bestard/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Richard A
Lammers/SA/Enron@Enron, Peter E Weidler/NA/Enron@Enron, Eddy
Daniels/NA/Enron@Enron, Randy Young/NA/Enron@Enron, Celina
Ozorio/SA/Enron@Enron, Laine A Powell/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Christiaan Huizer/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
ceb@tfts.tozzini.com.br, "PGS - Pedro G. Seraphim" <PGS@tfts.tozzini.com.br>,
Rob G Gay/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: John Barquin

FYI, I understand from John Barquin that he has decided to take a 1 year
leave of absence from V&E, starting Feb 1.  Cuiab? will be continue to be
covered by Cliff Rankin and Steve Tarry and the rest of the V&E team.  In
addition, John will be available for consultation on historical matters as
necessary.

Regards,
 John


Went VERY well.  Lots of positive vibes afterwards and goodwill towards both of you.  People most appreciated executives admitting to the fact that things were wrong and they were frustrated too, but everyone needs to get over it.  Big change from past history of blaming everyone but ourselves and just glossing over the real problems and making them sound better....

- R
Side note:  JL uses the word "I" a bit too much.


missing deal for matt

sell ees
cal 2-6
25 mw
48.05
sp15
off peak


Who or what the ****ing hell is San Felipe - I don't remember the Brits ever
winning a battle there .

Jon

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources
	Canada Corp.

	From:  Peter Keohane                           14/11/2000 18:35

To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jon Chapman/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Nice VP and possibly Pres.

When I look at Al Gore I continue to be amazed that one, let alone 50
million, Americans voted for him.  Both Clinton's and Gore's continued
shamelessness, and disregard for doing the right and decent thing, is only
slightly less amazing than the American people (or at least half of them)
continuing to find reasons to support them.  My only, yet substantive, vested
interest in the outcome is that we are inundated with US T.V. and I can't
bear the thought of looking at Gore (and God forbid Hillary) for the next
four years.  If they don't settle this Florida thing, I am going to have it
have my cable disconnected.

We vote in our federal election on November 27th.  We will not have any such
problems however - not because we are any better than anyone (in fact, I am
not entirely confident that most of my fellow Canadians will understand, or
have ever have understood, the ballot or voted for who they thought they were
voting for) - but rather because of the political system which Jon's
ancestors were so kind to bestow upon us, which I refer to as "parliamentary
dictatorship''.

(Sorry Tana if you are a Democrat, but that is the independent middle of the
road - yeah right - view of a Canadian observer.  Jon, I cannot, however,
apologize for the political ruin which your system of Government has brought
upon us, other to acknowledge that the problem my not be the system but
rather our screwed up regionalization of your unified parliamentary system
into 11 separate parliamentary systems - and I suppose that could be
construed as an apology of sorts, except, for the record, I will never
apologize to you for anything until you make a public, i.e. to Tana and me by
e-mail, confession of your sins on San Felipe.  For that matter, you are as
bad as Clinton and Gore.)

Peter.


----- Forwarded by Miyung Buster/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 10/09/2000 10:23 AM
-----

	djcustomclips@djinteractive.com
	10/05/2000 08:12 PM
	Please respond to nobody

		 To: 86464@WCTOPICS.djnr.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Utilities, Electric: Deregulation: Byers fines will boost renewable
energy

Byers fines will boost renewable energy
TERRY MACALISTER AND PAUL BROWN
?
10/05/2000
The Guardian
Copyright (C) 2000 The Guardian; Source: World Reporter (TM)

Electricity companies will face hefty fines for failing to meet environmental
targets under proposals to be outlined today by the industry secretary,
Stephen Byers.

He will delight the green lobby by ruling out waste incineration from his
definition of "renewables" and by putting the emphasis on new forms of energy
such as wind power.

An early consultation docu ment suggested a "buyout" fee of 2p per
kilowatt-hour for those who failed to buy 5% of their supplies from renewable
sources by 2003 and 10% by 2010. Well-placed sources say Mr Byers has
privately accepted the need to charge a "buyout" fee of 3p per kilowatt hour,
which will anger the electricity companies but please the renewable industry.

"We anticipate this will kickstart our sector, lead to over pounds 5bn worth
of capital investment and create thousands of jobs," said one executive from
a renewable energy company.

Big companies such as National Wind Power, a division of Innogy (formerly
National Power) and PowerGen Renewables will be among the beneficiaries.

Stephen Tindale, chief policy adviser to Greenpeace UK, said dropping
incineration would put the government "back on the right trajectory after a
series of disappointments". But the green lobby admits that further financial
help might be needed and say electricity companies will pass on some of their
extra costs to consumers.

The Department of Environment has had a target of 10% of electricity from
renewables by 2010 for more than two years as part of the government's
manifesto pledge to reduce carbon dioxide emissions by 20% by the same date.
But deregulation has forced the price of electricity down, helping gas-fired
power stations but penalising the less competitive renewable sector.

Folder Name: Utilities, Electric: Deregulation
Relevance Score on Scale of 100: 95

______________________________________________________________________
To review or revise your folder, visit Dow Jones CustomClips or contact Dow
Jones Customer  Service by e-mail at custom.news@bis.dowjones.com or by phone
at 800-369-7466. (Outside the U.S. and  Canada, call 609-452-1511 or contact
your local sales representative.)
______________________________________________________________________
Copyright (c) 2000 Dow Jones &Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved


I certainly agree on the tip of the iceberg point.  They do need to be
watched and watched carefully.  An isolated incident is one thing, a
pattern of losses is quite another.
         My experience with Campbell has been limited to watching him
operate in committee, and I have not been impressed.  I would be happy to
be surprised in the future.   MIKE

At 07:09 PM 7/24/2001 -0500, you wrote:

>Interesting points.  However, I don't ever recall you agreeing with every
>Commission decision on disallowances.  And I know you wouldn't establish
>differing standards for IOUs and state water agencies.
>
>I just hope that this isn't the tip of the iceberg.
>
>You really think that Campbell is a dim bulb?  A Republican, yes, but I
>haven't heard anyone else describe him as a dim bulb.
>
>Best,
>Jeff
>
>
>
>
>                     Mike
> Florio
>                     <mflorio@turn        To:     Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com
>
>                     .org>                cc:
>
>                                          Subject:     Re: Figures show
> state lost big on
>                     07/24/2001           extra
> power
>                     05:40
> PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Shame on you, Jeff!  I expect this sort of thing from inexperienced
>reporters and dim bulbs like Campbell.  But you KNOW that this sort of
>thing is no big deal.  And when did the PUC ever disallow these kinds of
>losses for the utilities?  I don't think my memory has gotten that bad.
>MIKE
>
>
>
>At 03:20 PM 7/24/2001 -0500, you wrote:
> >FYI.  Many similar stories in the major papers today.
> >
> >Best,
> >
> >
> >Jeff
> >
> >
> >Figures show state lost big on extra power
> >
> >
> >Posted at 9:53 p.m. PDT Monday, July 23, 2001
> >
> >
> >BY JOHN WOOLFOLK
> >
> >
> >Mercury News
> >
> >
> >State figures show California may have lost about $14 million this month
> >selling surplus electricity for less than it cost.
> >
> >
> >The Mercury News disclosed last week that some power was being sold at a
> >loss. But the new figures provide the first indication of just how much
> >excess power the state bought in its desperate effort to avoid blackouts
>--
> >and how cheaply some of that power was sold when it turned out not to be
> >needed.
> >
> >
> >A Republican lawmaker said Monday the loss also shows Democratic Gov. Gray
> >Davis' energy policies are needlessly costing consumers.
> >
> >
> >``This whole thing is a mess,'' said Assemblyman John Campbell, R-Irvine,
> >who requested details of the state's surplus power sales. ``The government
> >needs to get out of the power business before it costs Californians even
> >more money.''
> >
> >
> >A state spokesman didn't dispute the $14 million figure outright but said
> >it is an approximation based on average prices and that the actual loss
> >probably is less.
> >
> >
> >``It's a number I'm sure he likes very much, but it's definitely an
> >estimated number, and it could be far lower,'' said Oscar Hidalgo,
> >spokesman for the state Department of Water Resources.
> >
> >
> >Campbell responded that the loss also could be higher.
> >
> >
> >The state has spent $415 million on power so far this month.
> >
> >
> >State officials last week confirmed that cool weather and consumer
> >conservation have left California holding more power than it needs. The
> >revelation was a stunning turnaround for a state that months ago was
>paying
> >top dollar for power, expecting shortages this summer.
> >
> >
> >Price that was paid
> >
> >
> >The state bought 3.5 million megawatt-hours of electricity for July at an
> >average price of $118 per megawatt-hour, according to a response Friday by
> >the Department of Water Resources to Campbell's inquiry. The state has
>sold
> >178,000 surplus megawatt-hours in July at an average price of $37, the
> >department said.
> >
> >
> >Based on those average prices, the state paid $21 million for the surplus
> >power, which it sold for $6.5 million -- $14.5 million less than it cost.
> >
> >
> >A more precise calculation of the state's loss is difficult because
> >purchased power is acquired at different times and prices and pooled as a
> >``portfolio.''
> >
> >
> >Purchases included long-term contracts that averaged $138 per
>megawatt-hour
> >as well as cheaper spot-market buys.
> >
> >
> >State officials last week said they were selling surplus at $15 to $30 a
> >megawatt-hour, while some traders cited unconfirmed sales as low as $1.
> >
> >
> >Hidalgo noted that the surplus sales represent just 5 percent of
> >California's July purchases, which totaled $415 million. The $6.5 million
> >from sales will help lower the state's power bill, he said, adding that
> >utilities routinely sell some extra electricity.
> >
> >
> >``Despite the fact that we're in somewhat of a surplus, any power-buying
> >operation in the world is going to have to plan for these types of
> >situations,'' Hidalgo said. ``It's not unique, and in fact it's normal
> >operating procedure for any utility.''
> >
> >
> >Other Western utilities, including Portland General Electric in Oregon,
> >have said they, too, are selling some surplus power at a loss and describe
> >it as a cost of doing business.
> >
> >
> >The suppliers buying the state's surplus electricity on the cheap include
> >the big out-of-state energy companies that the governor has called
> >price-gouging ``snakes.'' Among them are Duke Energy, Dynegy Power and
> >Marketing, El Paso Power Services, Mirant, Reliant Energy and Williams
> >Energy.
> >
> >
> >`Best bid' taken
> >
> >
> >Hidalgo said the state took the best offers it could find.
> >
> >
> >``It's only reasonable to get the best bid you can,'' he said.
> >
> >
> >Campbell said the $14 million loss is troubling because ratepayers or
> >taxpayers will have to cover the cost, whereas a private utility could be
> >forced to eat the expense if regulators determined it was unreasonable.
> >
> >
> >State officials say what's more important is that the overall cost of
>power
> >is dropping, from an average daily tab of $64 million in May to $25
>million
> >this month, in part because the state has so much power.
> >
> >
> >Contact John Woolfolk at jwoolfolk@sjmercury.com <
> >mailto:jwoolfolk@sjmercury.com> or (408) 278-3410.


Vince,
I will contact them and set up a meeting.

Alex

Vince J Kaminski@ECT
10/30/2000 10:21 AM
To: Alex Huang/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Joseph Hrgovcic/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vasant Shanbhogue/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J
Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lance Cunningham/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sevil
Yaman/Corp/Enron@Enron, Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: PoweRisk 2000 followup in re WeatherDelta

Alex,

Can you set up a meeting to review this product. They have an office in
Houston.

Please, invite people on the distribution list.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 10/30/2000
10:26 AM ---------------------------

Denton Mike <Michael.Denton@caminus.com> on 10/24/2000 10:14:04 AM
To: vkamins@enron.com
cc:
Subject: PoweRisk 2000 followup in re WeatherDelta

Mr.  Kaminski,
?
Nick Perry and I  were recently discussing the conference in Paris, and we
gathered that you had  some interest in exploring possible uses of our new
WeatherDelta tool-kit.?  It is the only application that we know of, that
can?model temperature,  loads, and power prices in several locations
simultaneously: thus allowing the  user to measure the value an risk in a
variety of financial instruments,  physical obligations and assets.? I have
attached the product overview  sheet, and would be happy to discuss its
capabilities with you at your  convenience.??
?
Nick and I send our  regards,
?

Vice President
NA Strategic  Consulting
CAMINUS
747 Third  Avenue, 18th Floor
New York, New York 10017
(212) 515-3667

?

?

 - weatherdelta.pdf


----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 09/18/2000 11:01 AM -----

	Peter Keohane
	09/18/2000 09:38 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, dpef@blakes.com
		 cc: Sharon Crawford/CAL/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Alberta Pre-pay

---------------------- Forwarded by Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT on 09/18/2000 08:33
AM ---------------------------

Soma Ghosh
09/18/2000 03:06 AM
To: Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT, Jonathan McKay/CAL/ECT@ECT, Cris
Sherman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Derek Davies/CAL/ECT@ECT, William S
Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Griffith/Corp/Enron@Enron, "Ellison, Mike"
<Mike.Ellison@rbcds.com>, "McArthur, Ian" <IAN.MCARTHUR@ROYALBANK.COM>,
"Fleming, Blair" <BLAIR.FLEMING@ROYALBANK.COM>
cc: Brian Kerrigan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Catherine Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Alberta Pre-pay

All,

Please find attached the revised structure for the Alberta pre-pay.

The diagrams are accompanied by narrative & should provide some clarity.

Please note that the numbers used are not actual proposed prices/volumes &
have just been used for the purpose of illustrating the structure.

Regards,

Soma


fyi

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Roan, Michael
Sent:	Tuesday, July 17, 2001 10:30 AM
To:	Rodriquez, Andy
Cc:	Will, Lloyd; Sharfman, Guy
Subject:	FW: Market Trials Document
Importance:	High

Andy, attached is a MISO market trials checksheet.  Don't know whether you are on the distribution list but you should make sure that you get on it.  Can you have a look and get back to Mike if there are other issues that we need to check off before we are satisfied with the trials.  Also, MISO are having a set of educational sessions over the next couple of days, are you in on this?  I know that Lloyd has some people going so check in with him for coordination...

regards
Mike

Guy, didn't know if you were interested in MISO as well, let me know.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ruby Gillen <RGillen@midwestiso.org>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Ruby+20Gillen+20+3CRGillen+40midwestiso+2Eorg+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Tuesday, July 17, 2001 8:39 AM
To:	Averbeck, Steve; Borum, B.; Brown, Jeff; Cazalet, Edward; Collins, Doug; Doying, Richard; Fahey, Reem; Fielek, Michael; Gillis, Gary; Harvill, Terry; Hennen, David; Idle, Charles; Keller, Jim; Landgren, Dale; Learner, Howard; Michael Stuart (E-mail); Mork, Rob; Nelson, Robert; Paul Barber (E-mail); Pauley, B.; Pofok, George W.; Procario, John C.; Reed, Harvey J.; Roan, Michael; Robertson, Eric; Samuel C. Randazzo (E-mail); Simpson, John L.; Small, Michael; Stanton, James; Strand, John G.; Taylor, David; Trawick, John; William D. McCarty (E-mail); Wolfe, Ellen; Yaeger, Scott; Yeager, Walt; Ziegner, D.; Fitzhenry, Edward; Kind, Ryan; Mullett, Michael; Murray, Kevin
Subject:	Market Trials Document
Importance:	High

THE ATTACHED IS FROM THE DESK OF MIKE GAHAGAN.  MIKE WILL BE USING THIS
DOCUMENT AS PART OF HIS UPDATE REGARDING MARKET TRIALS.

>  <<Check List for Market Trials and Operations.doc>>

 - Check List for Market Trials and Operations.doc


Please note that all of the communications below are priveleged and
confidential attorney client communciations.

What do you think the possible liabilities are from the Toxic Waste created
below.  Ouch !!!  Maybe the attorneys need to conduct a seminar.

John Novak
02/28/2001 06:42 AM
To: Richard A Lammers/SA/Enron@Enron
cc: Eddy Daniels/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard A Lammers/SA/Enron@Enron, "Lefler,
Dean" <dlefler@velaw.com>, Rob G Gay/NA/Enron@Enron, "Federico Cerisoli
(E-mail)" <federico.cerisoli@enron.com>, "Gabriela Aguilar (E-mail)"
<Gabriela.Aguilar@Enron.com>

Subject: Re: YPF Consent

Please note that all of the communications below are priveleged and
confidential attorney client communciations.

In the future, please remember to mark all such emails "CONFIDENTIAL/ATTORNEY
CLIENT PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION".

Thank you.
 John

Richard A Lammers
02/26/2001 07:33 PM
Sent by: Richard A Lammers
To: Eddy Daniels/NA/Enron
cc: Richard A Lammers/SA/Enron@Enron, "Lefler, Dean" <dlefler@velaw.com>, Rob
G Gay/NA/Enron@Enron, "Federico Cerisoli (E-mail)"
<federico.cerisoli@enron.com>, "Gabriela Aguilar (E-mail)"
<Gabriela.Aguilar@Enron.com>, "Novak, John (Enron)" <john.novak@enron.com>

Subject: Re: YPF Consent

this is also an ok approach .Please clear with Eddy

From: Eddy Daniels on 02/26/2001 02:45 PM CST
To: Richard A Lammers/SA/Enron@Enron, "Lefler, Dean" <dlefler@velaw.com>, Rob
G Gay/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: "Federico Cerisoli (E-mail)" <federico.cerisoli@enron.com>, "Gabriela
Aguilar (E-mail)" <Gabriela.Aguilar@Enron.com>, "Novak, John (Enron)"
<john.novak@enron.com>
Subject: Re: YPF Consent

Rick, Dean & Rob --

I have some hesitations about having the Bank say re the conditions to the
GSA cannot be satisfied.  I suppose we are not really concerned that YPF will
anticipatorily cancel the GSA, but t would seem to be an invitation to them
to do that.

Also, do we really want the Banks to say it is not fruitful to proceed with
the consent?  Would it be better for the Banks simply to stick to their guns
re the consent, decline all of YPF's suggested changes, and insist on their
version of December 2000.  That way, YPF could be portrayed as partly to
blame for failure to achieve a financial close by May 4, 2001.  It might help
deflect the argument that we had control over all of the C.P.s and rigged it
to get out of the GSA.

What do you think?

	Richard A Lammers
	Sent by: Richard A Lammers
	02/26/2001 01:15 PM

		 To: "Lefler, Dean" <dlefler@velaw.com>
		 cc: "Lammers, Rick (Enron)" <richard.a.lammers@enron.com>, "Gabriela Aguilar
(E-mail)" <Gabriela.Aguilar@Enron.com>, "Federico Cerisoli (E-mail)"
<federico.cerisoli@enron.com>, "Novak, John (Enron)" <john.novak@enron.com>,
"Eddy Daniels (E-mail)" <Eddy.Daniels@enron.com>, Rob G Gay/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: YPF Consent

Please proceed along the lines you suggest in your discussion with schumacher
and Rob/Rick needs to talk to the business people at the Bank. Lets see if
the Lenders can respond in writing.

"Lefler, Dean" <dlefler@velaw.com> on 02/26/2001 02:24:27 PM
To: "Lammers, Rick (Enron)" <richard.a.lammers@enron.com>
cc: "Gabriela Aguilar (E-mail)" <Gabriela.Aguilar@Enron.com>, "Federico
Cerisoli (E-mail)" <federico.cerisoli@enron.com>, "Novak, John (Enron)"
<john.novak@enron.com>, "Eddy Daniels (E-mail)"  <Eddy.Daniels@enron.com>
Subject: YPF Consent

A quick update in regards to Doris Rodriguez's letter regarding the YPF
Consent:

I have left a message for David Schumacher asking that he call me to Doris's
letter.  Given the current status of things, it would seem to me that there
is no value in proceeding with the consent.  On the other hand, we need to
continue to build our case in the event of an arbitration with YPF.  It
would seem to me that the best thing would be for the lenders to tell Doris
that the lenders'  understanding is that, under the current project
schedule, the conditions precedent under the YPF GSA cannot be satisfied,
and that Enron and YPF have had some discussions regarding this issue and
will continue to discuss the issue.  Until the YPF GSA is restructured in
some form, there is little value in proceeding on the consent, especially
given that YPF and the lenders are still so far apart on the consent.

The status of the YPF consent is as follows: Doris sent a revised draft of
the consent to the lenders in August 2000.  The lenders responded with
comments (which included several of my comments) in October 2000.  Doris
then responded with a counter-draft in December 2000.  Doris' latest draft
again had numerous, significant comments, which I have not thoroughly
reviewed.  A quick review, however, indicates that Doris has cut in half
many of the time periods for the lenders to cure SCG defaults.  In addition,
Doris has restructured several provisions in order to make certain YPF
commitments run in favor of SCG only and not the lenders, which may be of no
value to the lenders in a situation in which the lenders have to step into
SCG's shoes.  I am confident that the lenders will not accept Doris's
comments, since many are proposals the lenders have rejected before.

Let me know whether I should suggest to Dave Schumacher a response to Doris
along the lines I recommend.

Regards, Dean
          ++++++CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE+++++
The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged.  This
email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization
named above.  If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized
representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any,
or the information contained herein is prohibited.  If you have received
this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email
and delete this email from your system.  Thank You


Kimberly Bates
East Gas/Origination
713-853-5193
713-646-8453 Fax


i know!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

	Nancy Sellers <Nancy.Sellers@RobertMondavi.com>
	11/20/2000 04:01 PM

		 To: "'Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com'" <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: Many many thanks

now that's excessive!!!!!!!!!!!!
-----Original Message-----
From:   Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com [SMTP:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com]
Sent:   Monday, November 20, 2000 1:58 PM
To:     Nancy Sellers
Subject:        RE: Many many thanks

OK!!!  I don't put my stuffing in the bird!!!  The more cranberries the
better!!!
Yours truly!!!!
Jeff!!!
p.s. how did pittsburg lose??!?!?!?!??!?!?!??

                    Nancy
Sellers
                    <Nancy.Sellers@RobertMo        To:
"'Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com'"
                    ndavi.com>
<Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>

cc:
                    11/20/2000 03:52 PM            Subject:     RE: Many many
thanks

If you would make an oyster stuffing - that would be really grand!  Not one
for inside the bird - but a separate one - does that work?  I'm doing the
cranberries tonight - but if yours is different from normal (!) we can
always have another!

     -----Original Message-----
     From:   Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com [SMTP:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com]
     Sent:   Monday, November 20, 2000 1:48 PM
     To:     Nancy Sellers
     Subject:        Re: Many many thanks

     great time.  thanks a million.  sorry i had to do homework for some of
     it.
     what would you like me to cook/bring for friday?  i make a mean oyster
     stuffing.  and my homemade cranberry sauce is ok, too.  just let me
     know.

                         Nancy Sellers
                         <Nancy.Sellers@RobertMo        To:     Cameron
     <cameron@perfect.com>, Jeff
                         ndavi.com>                     Dasovich
     <Jeff_Dasovich@enron.com>, "Prentice @
                                                        Berkeley"
     <PSellers@haas.berkeley.edu>, Prentice
                         11/20/2000 11:57 AM            Sellers
     <PSellers@pacbell.net>, Scott Laughlin
     <scottwl@hotmail.com>
                                                        cc:
                                                        Subject:     Many
     many thanks

     for such a fun birthday dinner and such extravagant presents!  My word
     -
     you guys sure went all out.  Best of course was having you all there.
     I
     love you!!

     Nancy
     (707) 251-4870 (phone)
     (707) 265-5446 (fax)
     "Plus je bois, mieux je chante"


Pam, answers inserted below.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Butler, Pam
Sent:	Thursday, January 10, 2002 9:48 AM
To:	Blanco, Ernesto
Cc:	Castagnola, Daniel; Buy, Rick
Subject:	Accro

Ernesto, can you please provide the following information:

1.	Please confirm that the date that Accro commenced commercial operation was 7/6/2001

The Accroven Commercial Operations start date was July 09, 2001.
.
2.	At the time Accro payouts were approved for payment relative to financial close, the projected NPV of cash flows related to Enron's interest was $18.331 million.  An updated NPV calculation, reviewed and signed off on by RAC is required, to determine what, if any, additional payments might be presented to the Compensation Committee for approval.  Norm Spalding has supplied December financials to Compensation and can supply them to the appropriate RAC individual.  By copy of this email to Rick Buy, I am asking who in RAC is available to review the financials.  Have you spoken to anyone in RAC about this project?

The Development Team had, at the time (21/2 years ago), the requirement to go to RAC for project approval. The Asset Management Co. has a "valuation" team that is constantly reviewing Proformas for all the assets and my understanding is that they work closely with RAC guidelines.

I think the process will entail:
1.	Sign off by RAC.
2.	Sign off by Jim Hughes and Stan Horton.
3.	Sign off by Compensation Committee.
4.	Sign off by Creditor Committee and possibly E&Y even though these are bonuses associated with non-debtor entity.

Thanks for your help.


Ava,

I need the rest of the on call listings for Contracts, Marketing, Storage, and EDI for the upcoming holiday schedule.  I'm at home under the weather today.  Before I post this I need to know who will be on call for the other groups.

Thanks,

Toby

-----Original Message-----
From: Garcia, Ava
Sent: Wed 12/26/2001 1:16 PM
To: Kuehl, Toby
Cc: Green, Alma; Carrillo, Alma
Subject: REVISION: Oncall Schedule

<< Weekend Sch 12.26.01.doc >>


Dear Generation/Power Marketing Executive:

The following is 1) this week's Alliance of Energy Suppliers' Express, and 2)
listing of recent filings at FERC.  Attached for your information is a report
in a PDF format summarizing significant filings.

                                  Alliance of Energy Suppliers Express
December 12, 2000

INSIDE WASHINGTON

The Week Ahead*

***Congress is poised to finish FY2001 appropriation bills and conclude the
106th Congress this week.
***FERC meets tomorrow, and is expected to issue a final rule on the market
interventions for California's ailing electricity market.  Other important
cases on the agenda include Illinois Powers' withdrawal from the Midwest ISO.

FEDERAL AFFAIRS

***Commission Approves CA-ISO Request For $250 Soft Price Cap***

FERC late last week approved a price cap change requested by the California
Independent System Operator (ISO), in response to the emergency conditions in
the California electricity market.  The current purchase price cap of $250
per Mwh will be lifted, and bids above that amount will be allowed but will
not set the clearing price paid to all sellers, as does the current purchase
price cap.  FERC notes this should attract more bids and alleviate supply
shortages.  Parties bidding above $250 will be required to report their bids
to FERC on a weekly basis and provide cost information.

FERC also authorized the ISO to penalize participating generators that
refusal to operate in response to an ISO request in an emergency.

MERGERS & ACQUISITIONS

 ***Constellation Energy Group Subsidiary Purchases Nine Mile Point Nuclear
Plants***

Constellation Energy Group announced plans to purchase 100 percent of Nine
Mile Point Unit 1 and 82 percent of Unit 2 for $815 million.  Constellation
would then own a total of 1,550 megawatts of Nine Mile Point's 1,757
megawatts of total generating capacity.  The sale is expected to close in
mid-2001, after receipt of all regulatory approvals.  The company had
recently announced plans to separate its wholesale merchant energy and retail
energy businesses into two stand-alone, publicly traded companies.
Constellation also announced that their merchant energy business was ranked
fifth in the nation for sales of electric power in the third quarter of 2000.

***Cinergy Affiliate To Acquire Two Merchant Generating Plants From Enron***

Cinergy Corporation has announced that Cinergy Capital & Trading, a
non-regulated affiliate, has signed a definitive agreement to purchase two
natural gas-fired merchant electric generating facilities located in the
Southeastern United States.   The acquisition consists of Enron's
494-megawatt Brownsville generation facility located in Tennessee, and the
504-megawatt Caledonia generation facility in Mississippi.  The transaction
will increase Cinergy's generation portfolio to about 21,000 megawatts, with
the non-regulated portion being about 15,000 megawatts.  "Cinergy has created
a regional leadership position in the Midwest power market and is focused on
strategic opportunities to expand our footprint," said Michael Cyrus,
president of Cinergy Capital & Trading.  He noted that the transaction
increases the non-regulated generating capacity "in excess of 30 percent in
just over a year."

NEW GENERATION

***Construction Of Edison Mission Power Plant in California Begins; Peaking
Unit To Be Online by August***

Edison Mission Energy (EME), an Edison International company, has started
construction of its Sunrise power plant on Thursday, December 7, having
received expedited approval from the California Energy Commission (CEC) to
proceed.  The facility will be located in Kern County, California, and will
bring both short- and long-term generation capacity to the state.  The
project will be completed in two phases.  Phase 1 will consist of a
320-megawatt simple-cycle peaking facility scheduled to be in service next
summer.  Phase 2 will convert the peaking facility to a 560-megawatt
combined-cycle operation with an in-service date of summer 2003.  Final
regulatory authority has been received only for Phase 1.

RISK MANAGEMENT

 ***Business Group Releases Final Report on Retail Energy Markets***

An energy industry group that includes utilities, energy suppliers,
regulators, vendors, consumer advocates and trade organizations last week
released the second and last volume of its report on Uniform Business
Practices for retail energy markets.  This volume comprehensively addresses
unbundled electricity metering.  Volume Ireleased last monthaddressed the
issues of customer information, customer enrollment & switching, billing &
payment processing, load profiling, supplier licensing, market participant
interaction, disputes between the utility and the supplier, and customer
inquiries.

"Uniform business transactions may help lower barriers to market entry,
encourage new product lines, reduce utility distribution company system costs
to accommodate retail access, and give customers more price and product
benefits," said Mike McGrath, EEI Group Director of Customer and Energy
Service.  To download the report, or for more information on the UBP effort,
see www.ubpnet.org.

***Upcoming Conference:  Achieving Profitability & Operational Safety in a
Competitive Marketplace - Co-Sponsored by the Alliance of Energy Suppliers***

An executive conference on safety in fossil power plants will be held in
Baltimore, Maryland next March 18-20.  The conferencechaired by leading
members of the power generation industrywill gather corporate leaders and
senior managers to discuss safety as a critical business issue in the
deregulating environment.  Charles Kelly, EEI's Director of Industry Human
Resource Issues, is on the advisory board of the meeting.  For more
information, or to download a conference program, visit
www.electricpowerexpo.com/safetyconference.html.

ENERGY DATA

*** Weekly Electric Output (Week 49)***

Electric output reached 69,281 GWh for the week ending December 2 (Week 49),
with the highest increase over 1999 levels in the Pacific Northwest region,
which had a 9.5 percent increase over 1999.  Looking at year-to-date
information, the Pacific Southeast leads the nation in growth of output.  For
more information, email alliance@eei.org.

The Alliance Express is a free news service sponsored by the Alliance of
Energy Suppliers.  This document can be redistributed.  Please send
questions, comments, or requests to alliance@eei.org, or telephone
202/508-5680.

                                  == RECENT FERC FILINGS ==

(1)  RTO ORDER 2000 DEVELOPMENTS

*  GRIDFLORIDA filed an answer to comments filed regarding its Order 2000 RTO
Compliance Filing.  RT01-67-000.  Filed December 5, 2000.

*  DAYTON POWER & LIGHT filed an answer to the protest of the COALITION OF
MIDWEST TRANSMISSION CUSTOMERS regarding its Order 2000 RTO Compliance
Filing.  RT01-37-000.  Filed December 5, 2000.

*  DUQUESNE LIGHT CO.  filed an update with respect to its activities to
participate in an RTO.  RT01-13-000.  Filed December 5, 2000.

*  GRIDSOUTH filed an answer to ENRON POWER MARKETING regarding GRIDSOUTH's
Order 2000 RTO Compliance Filing.  RT01-74-000.  Filed December 5, 2000.

*  CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT, DUKE ENERGY CORP. and SOUTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC &
GAS filed a joint answer to protests filed in GRIDSOUTH's Order 2000 RTO
Compliance Filing.  RT01-74-000.  Filed December 5, 2000.

*  SOUTHERN COMPANY SERVICES made one filing as an answer to ENRON's motion
opposing conditioning market-based rate authority on RTO participation and
another filing answering comments regarding its petition for a declaratory
order.  RT01-77-000.  Filed December 5, 2000.

*  PJM and PJM TRANSMISSION OWNERS each filed answers to protests and
comments made in PJM's Order 2000 RTO Compliance Filing.  RT01-2-000.  Filed
December 5, 2000.

*  AVISTA CORP., BONNEVILLE POWER ADMIN., IDAHO POWER, MONTANA POWER CO.,
PACIFICORP and PUGET SOUND ENERGY jointly and RTO WEST each filed amended
supplemental compliance filings and requests for declaratory order.  RTO WEST
also filed answers to protests.  RTO-35-000.  Filed December 1, 2000.

*  ENTERGY filed an answer to comments regarding its Order 2000 RTO
Compliance Filing.  RT01-75-000.  Filed December 5, 2000.

*  TRANSCONNECT filed an answer to comments regarding its Order 2000 RTO
Compliance Filing.  RT01-15-000.  Filed December 5, 2000.

*  SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRICAL POWER CO. and PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF OKLAHOMA
filed answers to protests regarding the SPP's Order 2000 RTO Compliance
Filing.  RT01-34-000.  Filed December 5, 2000.

*  SPP filed an answer to comments regarding its Order 2000 RTO Compliance
Filing.  RT01-34-000.  Filed December 5, 2000.

*  WESTERN RESOURCES and KANSAS GAS & ELECTRIC CO. filed an answer to their
Order 2000 RTO Compliance Filing.  RT01-6-000.  Filed December 5, 2000.

*  NEBRASKA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT filed an answer to MISSOURI RIVER ENERGY
SERVICE's motion for a technical conference on rate design issues and other
relief.  RT01-1-000.  Filed December 5, 2000.

*  MAINE ELECTRIC POWER CO. filed an answer to MASSACHUSETTS MUNICIPAL
WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO.'s comments regarding its Order 2000 RTO Compliance
Filing.  RT01-19-000.  Filed December 5, 2000.

*  BASIN ELECTRIC POWER COOP. and the WESTERN AREA POWER ADMINISTRATION each
filed an answer to MISSOURI RIVER ENERGY SERVICES' comments in the following
Order 2000 RTO Compliance filings:  RT01-1, 38, 40, 44, 53, 63, 78 -000.
Filed December 5, 2000.

*  UTILICORP filed an answer to comments in the following Order 2000 RTO
Compliance filings:  RT01-4, 29, 45, -000 and Dockets EC00-27-000 and
EC00-28-000.  Filed December 5, 2000.

*  CLECO UTILITY GROUP filed a motion of opposition to a motion to
consolidate and a request for a Commission investigation regarding the
following Order 2000 RTO Compliance filings:  RT01-25, 34, 75 -000.  Filed
December 5, 2000.

(2)  OTHER RTO DEVELOPMENTS

*  SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE CO. filed to request to defer its decision
from joining the MIDWEST ISO.  EC99-101-002.  Filed November 17, 2000.

*  CA ISO filed a supplemental answer to the CITY OF VERNON, CA's complaint
regarding a transmission control agreement.  EL01-14-000.  Filed December 1,
2000.

*  CITY OF VERNON filed a motion for leave to answer the CA ISO's
supplemental answer to the CITY's complaint.  EL01-14-000.  Filed December 7,
2000.

*  The following entities filed for rehearing or comments regarding the
Commission's November 1, 2000 Order proposing remedies for the California
wholesale electric market.  EL00-95-000, et. al.  Filed December 1, 2000.

-  GOVERNOR GRAY DAVIS
-  CA ISO
-  The SAN DIEGO ASSOC. of GOVERNMENTS and the SAN DIEGO REGIONAL ENERGY
OFFICE
-  CITY OF SAN DIEGO
-  ELECTRIC POWER SUPPLY ASSOC.
-  DYNEGY, EL SEGUNDO, LONG BEACH and CABRILLO I, II
-  DUKE ENERGY COMPANIES
-  CAL PX
-  AES CORP.
-  ENRON COMPANIES
-  RETX.COM

*  The CITY OF CHULA VISTA filed comments regarding the Commission's November
1, 2000 Order proposing remedies for the California wholesale electric
market.  EL00-95-000, et. al.  Filed December 6, 2000.

*  SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. filed a motion for the issuance of a
subpoena to the market surveillance committee of the CA ISO for the
production of documentary evidence, specifically information demonstrating
market power.  EL00-95-000, et. al.  Filed December 7, 2000.

*  PG&E NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP, PG&E GENERATING, USGEN NEW ENGLAND and PG&E
ENERGY TRADING-POWER filed a motion to intervene and comment regarding
NEPOOL's Sixty-Seventh revised NEPOOL Agreement, which changes the
amortization and repayment method for certain expenses related to NEPOOL's
restructuring incurred before May 1, 1999, and its Sixty-Eighth revised
NEPOOL Agreement regarding the same expenses incurred after January 1, 2000.
ER01-459-000.  Filed on December 6, 2000.

*  SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. filed a protest to the CITY OF VERNON's
compliance filing, specifically to the CITY's revised Transmission Owner
Tariff.  EL00-105-001.  Filed December 7, 2000.

*  SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. (SO CAL ED) filed a response to various
motions filed in opposition to its request to establish wholesale and retail
rates for the recovery of reliability service charges, including Reliability
Must Run generation costs and Out of Market dispatch costs, that the CA ISO
charges SO CAL ED.  ER01-315-000.  Filed December 7, 2000.

*  The CA ISO filed an answer to and the INDEPENDENT ENERGY PRODUCERS ASSOC.
filed an motion to dismiss the complaint filed by the CALIFORNIANS for
RENEWABLE ENERGY regarding the California wholesale market.  EL01-2-000.
Filed November 30, 2000.

*  CA ISO filed an answer to motions regarding its filed proposed unbundled
Grid Management Charge.  ER01-313-000.  Filed December 7, 2000.

*  ISO NE filed a compliance filing informing the Commission when it expects
to implement its proposal for a congestion management system and
multi-settlement system.  EL00-62-014.  Filed December 1, 2000.

*  NEPOOL filed an informational filing regarding the implementation of a new
structural screen in NEPOOL's market power monitoring and mitigation rule.
EL00-83-000 et. al.  Filed December 1, 2000.

(3) OATT/TRANSMISSION

*  NORTHWEST GENERATING COOP. filed a motion for rehearing regarding the
Commission's Order confirming and approving  BONNEVILLE POWER
ADMINISTRATION's rate schedule on a final basis.  EF00-2013-001.  Filed
November 27, 2000.

*  The following entities filed to intervene in PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC's
proposal to pass along the CA ISO's grid management charge.  ER01-424-000.
Filed December 1, 2000.

-  TURLOCK IRRIGATION DISTRICT
-  NORTHERN CALIFORNIA POWER AGENCY
-  WESTERN AREA POWER ADMINISTRATION
-  CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES
-  CITY OF SANTA CLARA, CA
-  CITIES OF REDDING AND SANTA CLARA, CA AND THE M-S-R PUBLIC POWER AGENCY
-  SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT
-  TRINITY PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT
-  MODESTO IRRIGATION DISTRICT

*  SIERRA PACIFIC POWER and NEVADA POWER CO. filed a request for rehearing
and clarification and SEI MICHIGAN filed a motion to protest regarding SIERRA
and NEVADA's compliance filing changing their tariffs. ER00-3188-002.  Filed
December 4, 2000.

*  AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEM filed an answer to protests regarding its
proposed amendment to its OATT in order to conform to Ohio's retail
competition laws.  ER01-256-000.  Filed December 5, 2000.

*  PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC (PG&E) filed a motion for clarification or
rehearing regarding the Commission's November 22, 2000 Order wherein the
Commission did not summarily rule that PG&E's proposed transmission rates
improperly included "generation tie" and "generation step-up" facilities.
ER01-66-000.  Filed December 5, 2000.

*  PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC (PG&E) filed an answer to motions to reject and
requests for suspension and expedited resolutions regarding its proposed
revisions to its Coordinated Operations Agreement to reflect the changes in
the California electric industry.  ER01-276-000.  Filed December 6, 2000.

*  ALLIANCE COMPANIES filed an answer to DYNEGY POWER MARKETING, CORAL POWER
and ENRON POWER MARKETING's motion for clarification or technical conference
regarding ALLIANCE's pro forma generator interconnection procedures and
agreement contained in the proposed ALLIANCE RTO OATT.  ER99-3144-004 and
EC99-80-004.  Filed December 6, 2000.

*  DUKE ENERGY filed an answer to NORTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC MEMBERSHIP CORP.'s
motion to protest and consolidate regarding the transition from a power
supply arrangement with DUKE ENERGY involving Partial requirements for
service and non-tariff network transmission service to a new arrangement
involving Network Integration Transmission Service purchased pursuant to
DUKE's OATT.  ER01-282-000 and ER01-283-000.  Filed December 6, 2000.

*  The following entities filed motions to intervene regarding ARIZONA PUBLIC
SERVICE CO.'s filed proposed revisions to its OATT for terms and conditions
for interconnection and a pro forma interconnection and operating agreement.
ER01-463-000.  Filed December 7, 2000.

-  DUKE ENERGY NORTH AMERICA and ENRON POWER MARKETING
-  RELIANT ENERGY POWER GENERATION
-  DYNEGY POWER CORP.
-  SALT RIVER PROJECT AGRICULTURAL IMPROVEMENT AND POWER DISTRICT

(4) MARKET COMPLAINTS

*  The following entities filed motions to intervene and comment regarding
the NYISO's complaint against NEW YORK STATE ELECTRIC AND GAS (NYSEG)
alleging that NYSEG has violated its obligations as a customer under the
NYISO's OATT by withholding $6.635 million that it owes NYISO.  EL01-17-000.
Filed December 6, 2000.

-  NRG POWER MARKETING and its affiliated companies
-  AQUILA ENERGY MARKETING CORP.
-  NEW YORK STATE ELECTRIC & GAS CORP.
-  PG&E NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP
-  SOUTHERN ENERGY COMPANIES AND SITHE POWER MARKETING
-  INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS OF NEW YORK
-  NYSEG

(5) MERGERS/CORPORATE RESTRUCTURING

*  DELMARVA POWER & LIGHT, which is the process of becoming solely a wires
company, filed an application to assign its rights and obligations under two
wholesale purchase agreements with PEPCO and ELECTRIC CLEARINGHOUSE to
CONECTIV ENERGY SUPPLY.  EC01-34-000.  Filed December 1, 2000.

*  AMERICAN REF-FUEL COMPANY OF HEMPSTEAD, BFI ENERGY SYSTEMS OF HEMPSTEAD,
ALLIED WASTE INDUSTRIES, DUKE/UAE REF-FUEL, DUKE/UAE HEMPSTEAD I and II,
UNITED AMERICAN ENERGY CORP. and DUKE ENERGY filed for two separate approvals
of dispositions of certain jurisdictional assets.  EC01-37-000 and
EC01-38-000.  Filed December 5, 2000.

*  SEMASS PARTNERSHIP, AMERICAN REF-FUEL COMPANY OF SEMASS, ALLIED WASTE
INDUSTRIES, BROWNING-FERRIS INDUSTRIES OF NEW YORK, BFI ENERGY SYSTEMS OF
SEMASS, DUKE/UAE OPERATIONS OF SEMASS, DUKE/UAE REF-FUEL, UNITED AMERICAN
ENERGY CORP. (UAE) AND DUKE ENERGY CORP. filed for approval of dispositions
of certain jurisdictional assets.  EC01-39-000.  Filed December 5, 2000.

*  AMERICAN REF-FUEL COMPANY OF ESSEX COUNTY, ALLIED WASTE INDUSTRIES, BFI
ENERGY SYSTEMS OF ESSEX COUNTY, DUKE/UAE REF-FUEL, DUKE/UAE ESSEX, DUKE/UAE
ESSEX II, UNITED AMERICAN ENERGY CORP. AND DUKE ENERGY CORP. Filed for
approval of dispositions of certain jurisdictional assets.  EC01-40-000.
Filed on December 5, 2000.

*  PG&E NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP, PG&E ENTERPRISES and PG&E SHAREHOLDINGS filed
for approval of the upstream ownership of the subsidiaries' jurisdictional
facilities following a proposed intra-corporate reorganization.
EC01-41-000.  Filed December 4, 2000.

*  NRG ENERGY, NRG GRANITE ACQUISITION, LS POWER and GRANITE POWER PARTNERS
filed for approval to transfer certain jurisdictional facilities.
EC01-42-000.  Filed December 6, 2000.

(6) MISCELLANEOUS

*  The NY ISO filed a report on certain generation issues one year after
start-up in Docket Nos. ER97-1523-003 and 4, OA97-470-004 and 5, and
ER97-4234-002 and 3.  Filed December 1, 2000.

*  WABASH VALLEY POWER filed comments regarding the proposed termination of
CINERGY's operating agreement.  ER01-200-000.  Filed December 4, 2000.

*  CINERGY filed an answer to WABASH VALLEY POWER's comments regarding the
proposed termination of CINERGY's operating agreement.  ER01-200-000.  Filed
December 6, 2000.

_________________________________________________________

 - FercFilings121100.PDF


I have created deal 266962 for the volumes at mtr 6757.

What price is Duke reporting for the mtr 5192 volumes?  The only activity
we've had out there is payback with Koch.

D

   Aimee Lannou                05/09/2000 03:30 PM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Fred Boas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Sarco Lateral and Crow O'Connor Meters

Daren - Have you had a chance to look at this?

- Aimee
---------------------- Forwarded by Aimee Lannou/HOU/ECT on 05/09/2000 03:26
PM ---------------------------
   Aimee Lannou                05/04/2000 03:26 PM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Fred Boas/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Sarco Lateral and Crow O'Connor Meters

Daren - Can you set up new deals for meter 6757 and 5192?

 Meter 6757 Crow O'Connor -  Counterparty Duke Energy & Trading

  Month  Contract Deal #
  June 99  ENA 201 87426
  July 99  HPL 215 95072
  Aug 99  HPL 215 102775
  Sept 99  HPL 215 110502

 Meter 5192 Sarco Lateral

  No deal has ever been set up for meter 5192 for Duke Energy & Trading.
There is flow for May, July and Nov. 99.

Will you please let me know if you set up new deals for these meters?

Thanks.

Aimee
---------------------- Forwarded by Aimee Lannou/HOU/ECT on 05/04/2000 03:17
PM ---------------------------

Fred Boas
05/04/2000 12:08 PM
To: Aimee Lannou/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Robert E Lloyd/HOU/ECT@ECT, Howard B Camp/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Sarco Lateral and Crow O'Connor Meters

Aimee:

The Crow O'Connor, meter 6757 has its gas allocated to Strangers Gas for
April and May 1999 and Duke has been calling Settlements asking for their
money.  I will need to set up accounting arrangements for this meter for
these months so please provide me the correct transportation contract and
valid deal # for this transaction.

In addition, the Sarco Lateral, meter 5192 has its gas allocated to Strangers
Gas for May and July 1999 and Duke has been calling Settlements asking for
their money.  I will need to set up accounting arrangements for this meter
for these months so please provide me the correct transportation contract and
valid deal # for this transaction.

I would like to get this done ASAP since the customer is calling Settlements
and we start close next week.

Thanks,

Fred


Kevin, attached is a letter thtat we Fed Exed to you with a schematic.
Please let me know if you recieve it by friday. Paul

 - ATOKA.DOC


Please take a look and get back to me ASAP.  I intend to e-mail results to
Rick, Harry and Jim COB today.


Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 06/06/2001 03:37 PM -----

	Susan Bailey
	06/05/2001 05:40 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Merchant Energy Group of the Americas

Sara or Mary,

Carol asked that I have one of you handle the following request for the
captioned counterparty with respect to the financial consents.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Carol is handling the consent for EPMI, and set forth below are her
instructions to Rhonda Denton with EPMI

Rhonda:
Enclosed is a clean and marked version of the MEGA Assignment.  Is the plan
to confirm these trades under the existing Master with Morgan until a new EEI
Master is executed?  What is the cutoff date for this assignment?

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Set forth below is original message I received from the Counterparty
requesting such consents.   I originally thought Carol would handle, but she
said one of you should handle the financial piece for ENA.   So attached
hereto is that orignal message and the proposed consents:

	Susan Bailey
	05/14/2001 03:12 PM

		 To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: From MEGA, Consent to Assignment....

Carol,

Please review message below from Kristina Drew @ Merchant Energy.  I thought
you would be the appropriate lawyer to work on this as it involves EPMI as
well as a derivative piece with ENA.

FYI:  the assignment is not of immediate need, being that FERC approval must
secured.

If you do not think this to be the case, please advise as to who should work
on this matter.

Cordially,
Susan S. Bailey
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, Suite 3806A
Houston, Texas 77002
Phone: (713) 853-4737
Fax: (713) 646-3490
E:mail:  Susan.Bailey@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT on 05/14/2001 03:06 PM -----

	"Drew, Kristina" <DrewK@merchantenergy.com>
	05/14/2001 03:05 PM

		 To: "'susan.bailey@enron.com'" <susan.bailey@enron.com>
		 cc: "Abba Gana, Mustapha" <AbbaGanaM@merchantenergy.com>
		 Subject: From MEGA, Consent to Assignment....

Susan,

Please find attached for your review, a Consent to Assignment Agreement
between us, Enron North America Corporation and Morgan Stanley Capital Group
Inc.  We would like to have the document ready to execute at about the same
time we execute the Physical Power Consent to Assignment Agreement with
Enron Power Marketing, Inc., and we are waiting for FERC approval on the
Physical Power Sales as well.  I just wanted to present the agreement to you
now, so that if it is necessary, we have time to discuss any concerns.  I
look forward to talking with you to work toward the execution of the
Agreement.

 <<ENA (Basis Swap) Assignment Consent Agreement 042501.doc>>
<<ENA (Nat Gas) Assignment Consent Agreement 042501.doc>>

Thanks,

Kristina M. Drew
Contract Adminstrator
Merchant Energy Group of the Americas, Inc.
410.295.1708

 - ENA (Basis Swap) Assignment Consent Agreement 042501.doc
 - ENA (Nat Gas) Assignment Consent Agreement 042501.doc


Jeff,

We shall forward to you shortly a copy of the message from Sandeep with the
numbers you have
requested.  What follows below are the extracts from two recent articles on
the power situation in India
published by The Financial Times.

The first article describes recent power outage in northern India affecting
millions of people.
One possible line of defense is pointing out to the value of  output lost due
to  power
shortages. It is obvious that the value of lost production exceeds the cost
of power produced
by the Dhabol plant (expensive as it may be). The power cut affected 230
million people.

The second article is Enron specific.

Vince

                     ASIA-PACIFIC: Power failure hits north India
                     Financial Times; Jan 3, 2001
                     By ANGUS DONALD

                     Tens of millions of people were left without electricity
in northern India
                     yesterday after a power grid breakdown.

                     Electricity was gradually switched on in some areas and
most parts of the
                     capital New Delhi, with 60 to 70 per cent of supply
expected to be restored
                     by the end of the day, according to power grid
officials.

                     The Associated Chambers of Commerce and Industry
(Assocham), a
                     leading business organisation, expressed "deep concern"
and called for a
                     mechanism to prevent future disruption that could
"cripple the economy".

                     The power failure across eight Indian states, including
New Delhi, disrupted
                     train services, water supplies and the telephone network
and forced
                     hospitals to switch to emergency generators.

                     The fault occurred on the Northern Grid, which provides
electricity for 226m
                     people, and affected the states of Delhi, Haryana,
Punjab, Uttar Pradesh,
                     Himachal Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan and Jammu
and Kashmir.

                     A breakdown at a sub-station in Kanpur in Uttar Pradesh,
India's most
                     populous state, caused an overload of power on other
lines, which then
                     failed as well.

                     Trains stopped running for most of the day and signals
systems were
                     damaged. New Delhi international airport was also
slightly affected before
                     its own power supply could be engaged.

                     "We will probe into the reasons for the failure. It is
most likely to be a
                     technical failure, but we will investigate why it
happened," Suresh Prabhu,
                     the power minister, was quoted as saying by Press Trust
of India.

                     India suffers regularly from power problems because of
lack of funding to
                     upgrade infrastructure. Theft of supplies is also a big
problem. Thirty per
                     cent of the country's electricity is stolen, according
to analysts. In New
                     Delhi as much as 50 per cent is stolen.

                     Two years ago, a power failure blacked out Uttar Pradesh
and Delhi for
                     hours.

                     Assocham issued a statement, saying that increasing
industrial demand
                     would exacerbate the problems already faced by India's
inefficient power
                     sector. "The slow progress, particularly in
strengthening the transmission
                     and distribution system, and ever increasing theft will
contribute to
                     worsening the power supply situation further."

                     Copyright: The Financial Times Limited

  , Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2000. "FT" and "Financial Times"
are trademarks of The Financial Times. Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions.

******************************************************************************
*************************************

                     ASIA-PACIFIC: Energy group launches image offensive:
Enron has a
                     plan to reverse its reputation as a profiteering
multinational
                     operating in India, writes Khozem Merchant

                     Financial Times; Jan 3, 2001
                     By KHOZEM MERCHANT

                     Enron, the US energy producer and a constant target of
criticism in India, is
                     hitting back with a campaign to reverse its image as a
profiteering
                     multinational.

                     Its "myth and reality" offensive in local newspapers
follows the west Indian
                     state of Maharashtra's decision to review the tariff it
pays the Texas-based
                     company, whose Dollars 2.2bn electricity generating
plant at Dabhol is
                     India's biggest single foreign investment.

                     Maharashtra's tariff has more than doubled since 1993
and is three times
                     greater than that charged by other independent power
producers (IPPs).
                     The tariff has risen because of the depreciation of the
rupee against the
                     dollar and the high but now falling price of naphtha
fuel. The state also pays
                     a fixed capacity charge of Rs970m (Dollars 21m) a month,
reflecting the
                     huge project cost and, controversially, irrespective of
consumption.

                     A showdown looks inevitable, reminiscent of a clash six
years ago that
                     damaged India's appeal to foreign investors. A former
official of the World
                     Bank, which has criticised the deal, says Enron is
emerging "as the East
                     India Company of the 21st century" - a reference to the
British trader that
                     colonised key areas of the Indian economy in the 19th
century.

                     The stand-off is the latest blot on India's power
sector. The UK's PowerGen
                     and Cogentrix of the US have quit India recently,
frustrated by long approval
                     procedures, inadequate payments mechanisms or because of
higher
                     returns elsewhere.

                     "India has lost time and opportunity and has driven
returns down by six
                     percentage points," says Gerry Grove-White, former India
general manager
                     of PowerGen, which has sold its 655MW plant in Gujarat
to China Light &
                     Power of Hong Kong.

                     India's national plan for the five years to 2002 says
generating capacity
                     must rise by 40,000MW to about 120,000MW. But since
1992, IPPs have
                     added only 3,000MW and 2,500MW remains under
construction. This is
                     insufficient to support official projections of 6 to 8
per cent economic
                     growth.

                     Enron was a bellwether of India's liberalisation,
winning fast-track project
                     approval in the early 1990s. Phase 1, a 740MW plant
fuelled by expensive
                     naphtha came on stream in May 1999, and phase 2, a
Dollars 1.87bn plant
                     of 1,624MW capacity that will run on cheaper liquefied
natural gas (LNG),
                     will be completed this year. Only two of seven other
fast-track proposals
                     have achieved financial closure.

                     From the outset Enron encountered attacks, culminating
in Maharashtra's
                     then nationalist government cancelling the project
before renegotiating
                     terms no less onerous. Vilasrao Deshmukh, chief minister
of the successor
                     government, says the power purchase agreement is
unaffordable.

                     Enron, whose attackers also include cultural
chauvinists, wants to maintain
                     good political relations in a hostile but lucrative
environment. Enron views
                     India as a testing ground for its evolution from a
traditional manager of
                     power plants to a broad-based trader of commodities,
such as energy, gas
                     and bandwidth.

                     To support these ambitions Enron hopes to trade energy
between power
                     surplus and deficit states, once legislation is passed
this year. It is building
                     an LNG terminal and pipelines to trade imported natural
gas. And it is
                     laying a 15,000km fibre-optic network to trade bandwidth
space in a country
                     desperately short of this new economy commodity.

                     In any event, Enron believes it has a watertight
contract. It is supported by
                     many that believe any subversion of the contract would
confirm investor
                     perception of Maharashtra, India's financial and
industrial hub, as an
                     unreliable destination for investment.

                     Mr Deshmukh - who has avoided the language of his
predecessor, which
                     threatened to "dump Dabhol into the Arabian Sea" - is
under pressure from
                     radical members of his wobbly coalition. But his options
are limited.
                     Scrapping the project would be ruinous for an
economically troubled state
                     that would have to compensate shareholders.

                     Maharashtra State Electricity Board, the local utility
and Enron's main
                     client, is obliged to dispatch or "off-take" 90 per cent
of Dabhol's output. Yet
                     MSEB has never honoured these guarantees. Its off-take
has averaged 60
                     per cent since the plant opened and, in effect, MSEB has
been paying a lot
                     more while consuming a lot less power.

                     One reason off-take is low is because the state's tough
new regulator has
                     told MSEB to buy from cheaper sources. Enron says the
tariff would be
                     Rs4.02/kWh if MSEB's off-take averaged 90 per cent. But
with off-take a
                     third lower, the average tariff is Rs4.94 per unit, and
often higher. In
                     October, the tariff was Rs6.91 per unit, when off-take
was about 49 per
                     cent. Enron says tariffs should come down when phase 2,
run on cheaper
                     LNG, starts.

                     These cost pressures have forced MSEB to take up only
half of a 30 per
                     cent equity option in phase 2. Enron has acquired the
balance and
                     mandated bankers to find a buyer.

                     Enron's difficulties have undermined the appeal of IPPs,
which have failed to
                     deliver the flood of investments. Potential IPPs feared
they would never be
                     paid by state generating boards that have become a
byword for corrupt
                     management of power.

                     Reform of state electricity boards, whose uneconomic
pricing means
                     industrial users subsidise poor farmers, as well as
transmission and
                     distribution (T&D) services to check huge theft and
technical losses, is
                     overdue. "Given the limited resources, money would be
better spent on T&D
                     rather than on new plant," says Oliver Blackaby,
managing director of N M
                     Rothschild in India, which is advising Karnataka on the
privatisation of its
                     distribution network.

                     For the moment, attention is fixed on Enron's ability to
satisfy the
                     competing interests of investors and clients. As Sanjay
Bhatnagar, chief
                     executive officer of Enron India, said in a recent trade
magazine, one of the
                     key lessons learned from phase 2 is "having flexibility
to deal with
                     externalities".

                     Copyright: The Financial Times Limited

  , Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2000. "FT" and "Financial Times"
are trademarks of The Financial Times. Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions.


The ClickAtHome portal (www.clickathome.net) will allow employees to access MS Outlook (email, contacts and calendars), eHRonline, PEP, and other employee applications via the internet using your existing network ID and password.  This functionality will be available mid-summer and will not require any action on your part.

For other remote access requests, the Information Technology group (I.T.) is working on a solution to identify and address the issues involved in providing eligible employees approved access to the Enron Network and other applications by the third quarter.  You will receive future messages on our progress.

I.T. is not responsible for the support for your ClickAtHome PC and Internet service.  Support is provided by the appropriate vendor which you may contact directly at the numbers listed below.

Hardware Technical Support
Dell Technical Support is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week and can be reached at 866-220-3355 or on the Internet at www.support.dell.com. Please have your 5-digit service tag number ready when you call. It is located on the back of your computer.

Internet Service Provider Technical Support
MSN supportservices.msn.com
	Customer Service 	 	(800) 386-5550
	Technical Support 		(877) 635-7019
	DSL Technical Support  	(877) 327-6744
Time Warner Houston		(713) 335-FAST or (713) 335-3278
Kingwood Cable 			(281) 360-7500
AT&T Portland 			(888)-780-4663
Cox Cable 				(402) 933-3000


Barry,
 I have attached Stacy's document.  Please advise if you are going to send it
out on ENA stationary, or should I direct the Confirm Desk to send it out.

	Barry Tycholiz
	11/07/2000 01:49 PM

		 To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Crestar Document

There is a second document that Stacey was working on that is pretty much
identical as the Monthly firm deal but involves only gas on Alliance called
AOS ( this is like Interuptable gas, but a little different ). The confirms
has been raised previously, and you should have this on file.

This is the file name on the bottom of Stacey's last document.
o:\common\legal\sdickson\agreements\crestarspotcnfm.doc.

Let me know...

PS . did you send the confirm to Crestar on the firm volumes. BT


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 12/19/2000 07:56
AM ---------------------------

Jody Pierce@ECT
12/18/2000 12:31 PM
To: Eric Boyt/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Jeffrey Keenan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric
Booth/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON, Theresa
Vos/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: City of Austin Agreement and Exhibits

Section 6.7.2
Invoices should be addressed to:

Enron North America
1400 Smith St
Houston, TX 77002
ATTN: Theresa Vos (713-345-8173)

Eric Boyt@ENRON
12/18/2000 11:20 AM
To: Jeffrey Keenan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric
Booth/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jody Pierce/HOU/ECT@ECT, Theresa
Vos/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: City of Austin Agreement and Exhibits

Attached in the latest draft of the GE-ENA breakout contract.  The lawyers
need a few more items to complete before execution.  Please send to Kay Mann
and copy me on responses.

Jeff/Eric - Please take a look at the e-mail below and help out on the
following...
accurate description of facitliy-pg 1
questions regarding the exhibits
Address for Section 25.1 and 25.3

Jody/Theresa - Please provide the appropriate address for Section 6.7.2
(payments)

Let me know if you have any questions and thanks for your assistance!

Regards,

Eric

---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Boyt/Corp/Enron on 12/18/2000 11:16
AM ---------------------------

Kay Mann
12/15/2000 07:55 AM
To: Eric Boyt/Corp/Enron@Enron, stuart.zisman@enron.com, Billy
Lemmons/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: City of Austin Agreement and Exhibits

---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 12/15/2000 07:55
AM ---------------------------

"Thompson, Peter J." <peterthompson@akllp.com> on 12/14/2000 06:35:27 PM
To: "Kay Mann (E-mail)" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc: "Lee. Johnson (E-mail)" <lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com>, "Kent. Shoemaker
(E-mail)" <kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com>, "Roseann Engeldorf (E-mail)"
<roseann.engeldorf@enron.com>, "Cheryl. Lipshutz (E-mail)"
<Cheryl.Lipshutz@enron.com>, "Brett. R. Wiggs (E-mail)"
<Brett.R.Wiggs@enron.com>, "Ben. Jacoby (E-mail)" <Ben.Jacoby@enron.com>,
"Pipitone, Paul" <paulpipitone@akllp.com>, "Cobb, Chris"
<chriscobb@akllp.com>

Subject: City of Austin Agreement and Exhibits

     Attached please find clean copies of the most recent versions of
the City of Austin Agreement and Exhibits, as well as blacklines showing
changes from the last version circulated.

To complete the agreement, we need to include the following:

1. The description of the facility on page 1.

2. The addresses and contacts for sections 7.7.2, 25.1 and 25.3.

To complete the exhibits, we need to include the following:

1. Exhibits H-2 and R need to be added.

2. Do we need to add language to section B of Exhibit A-1?
 <<Comparison of Exhibits to City of Austin Agt. Form to V. 1.DOC>>
<<Comparison of City of Austin Agreement - Versions 2 to 3.DOC>>  <<City
of Austin Exhibits.DOC>>  <<Gas Turbine Agreement Draft of
12/13/00.DOC>>
 - Comparison of Exhibits to City of Austin Agt. Form to V. 1.DOC
 - Comparison of City of Austin Agreement - Versions 2 to 3.DOC
 - City of Austin Exhibits.DOC
 - 00.DOC


This is special from Christine .

ds

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	christine.mcevoy@enron.com@ENRON
Sent:	Wednesday, December 12, 2001 3:36 PM
To:	Schoolcraft, Darrell
Subject:	A Hallmark E-Card from Christine McEvoy

Greetings!

We wanted to let you know that Christine McEvoy created a Hallmark.com e-card for you.  To see your card, click the link below, or copy and paste this link into your Web browser's address line:
http://ecardview.hallmark.com/hmk/Website/greeting.jsp?id=EG3104-640181-3621572

If you have trouble using the link we provided, please follow these steps:

1. Click this link to go to our homepage, or copy and paste it into your browser's address line:
   http://www.hallmark.com
2. Click on the "e-cards and cards" link.
3. Click on the "browse free e-cards" link in the e-cards section of the page.
4. Click on the link on the upper left hand side of the page that says "pick up a greeting."
5. Enter your email address and this retrieval number: EG304401621572.  This e-card will be available for 90 days.
6. If you'd like to send an e-card yourself, use the "send your own greeting" button beside the e-card.
Enjoy!

While you're visiting Hallmark.com, be sure to explore our other products.  We offer paper cards, great gifts, beautiful flowers and more.  And our e-cards are fast, fun, and free.  You're sure to find something you like at Hallmark.com.

With best wishes,

Jody Ellis
Hallmark.com

P.S.  Your privacy is our priority.  To see our online Privacy and Security statement, please use this link:
http://www.hallmark.com/hmk/Website/goto.jsp?CONTENT_KEY=FOOTER_PRIVLEGL&CONTENT_TYPE=ARTICLE


Please complete the attached form and also let me know if you have an
interest in proceeding with Wendi.

Thanks!

Pam


I will also be formulating my "daily log" of conversations with CA PX as
asked.

Tracy


Steve, thanks for the email.  I will not be attending.
m


Start Date: 3/1/01; HourAhead hour: 5;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001030105.txt


The Weather desk just completed a deal with CTG Resources, Inc, (the holding
company for Connecticut Natural Gas).  This will need to be confirmed under a
Deemed ISDA.  For this one trade, we do not need to include credit
provisions; however, we will need to send them a draft ISDA (as the desk
intends to continue transacting with this entity).  I will prepare a credit
worksheet for use in preparing the draft (probably beginning of next week
before I get to it).  Please call me if you have any questions.  Thanks!


per Elizabeth Sager's request, please see this
attachment:


Gentlemen -

We are working on a non-disclosure agreement with BEA Systems Inc., a
software company.  The basis for the NDA is the disclosure to BEA of the EOL
software and discussions concerning a possible transaction involving either
the purchase or long term license of the software.  This possible transaction
is in association with an ongoing project by ENW involving the EOL software.

The original NDA provided to BEA contained a unilateral non-solicitation
provision.  BEA responded with a bilateral provision that sought to reach
beyond BEA and ENW.  I have provided the attached language to BEA for their
review.  They have subsequently approved the language.

Basically, the attached is our standard non-solicitation provision, but has,
as a caveat, a statement that the non-solicitation is only applicable to BEA
and ENW, and not affiliates/subsidiaries or parent companies.

At your convenience, please let me know if the attached is acceptable for the
BEA non-disclosure agreement.

If any of you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me.

Mark
Senior Counsel, EWS
Phone:     713-345-8897
Facsimile: 713-646-3490
E-Mail:      Mark.Greenberg@enron.com


Sara:
Here are the final forms of Annex A for ENA and ECC.

Susan:
Please make sure that these are put into the form bank.

Carol


no--golf's great!  df

From: Emily Sellers/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/03/2001 11:14 AM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Your Law Conference RSVP Form

Drew, just a FYI....I signed you up for golf at the Law Conference for
Thursday afternoon....you were out of pocket and Martha said you like
golf....I can change it to Skeet shooting or rafting on the Guadalupe if
you'd rather do that.....!!!!! Seriously, let me know if you want me to
change it....

Emily


Marion, the leads include Heather Kroll and Ozzie Pagan in the Eastern
Origination Group and Michael L Miller in the Principal Investing Group.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 10/03/2000
01:11 PM ---------------------------

Marion W Cole@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
10/02/2000 01:24 PM
To: David W Delainey@ECT
cc:
Subject: Fuel Cells

David,

Congratulations on the Fuel Cell venture.  I have been trying to get Enron
interested in this technology for many years.  I am glad someone found the
right formula.  I would like to discuss applications of Fuel Cell technology
and where Enron intends to take this product with someone in your
organization.  The press release did not disclose who the lead promoter in
your organization is.  Can you direct me to the right person?

Best regards,

Marion Cole


Girl, that's my dilemma as far as a house is concerned.  I have no idea, all I know is that I don't want to drive for an hour to get to work.  I really wish I could tear down and rebuild where I am.  I love the "hood" aspect of the neighborhood, I love the "colored" folks, and so on.  I need to talk to a loan officer and see exactly what I would qualify for.  All I know, is that I'm not getting any younger, and why not enjoy a new house now, what am I waiting for?

Girl, I hope the plumbing isn't too expensive as well, but it has to be done!

Jordan's old silly teacher called me at work this morning around 8:30 a.m.  When I answered the phone, I recognized her voice immediately, and I got scared that something had happened.  That heifer called to tell me that Jordan was telling her that I had given him money to buy a Fruitopia soft drink (first of all, it took me questioning her three times to find out what the heck Fruitopia meant)  and she wanted to check with me to see if that were true, because she didn't allow that particular drink in her class because it had too much sugar in it......well, I was pissed number one, that you would even call and upset me at work by asking me such a dumb ass question.  You are the adult here, not Jordan!  She also said Jordan kind of smarted off to her.....well, take control sister.....you obviously have no control if you have to call me on my job to settle an insignificant matter such as this.  ABSOLUTELY RIDICULOUS!!!!!!

Now on the other hand, Jordan will have to be punished for lying, but my goodness, can you believe it?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nytasha.Sims@dynegy.com@ENRON
Sent:	Monday, October 15, 2001 2:51 PM
To:	Mims, Patrice L.
Subject:	Re: Slow Day

Hey girl!!  When I opened up this e-mail I said, "Wow"!!  It has to be
EXTREMELY SLOW to get an e-mail like this!!  Girl you are so-oo crazy.
Sounds like you were a true FOX last night.  Thank goodness you weren't in
Chicago, looking like that!!  The outfit sounds cute.  Doesn't it make you
feel good when the kids admire you.  I can relate to that warm, fuzzy
feeling brought on by your child.  I can't wait to see the pictures.

I'm sorry to hear that you're having plumbing problems.  Did Todd call a
plumber last night?  I wonder how expensive that job will be?

I'm looking forward to rehearsal also.  Where was V. Michael on Sunday?  I
was wondering where Samantha had been myself.  I heard that she sang with
the women 5th Sunday.  I was thinking she had gone over to Higher
Dimensions with Sis. Kaye.  We need to visit that church and see what all
the hupla is.  Do you have a hat for next Sunday?

After church, I went home & cooked spaghetti.  Steve's cousin was giving a
small family b-day gathering for his mom.  I didn't want to go, but Steve
asked me to.  On the way home, he wanted to talk.  He told me how much he
loved me, etc...  Yeah, Yeah, Yeah.  It all sounded so familiar.  He also
apologized for the big blow up on Saturday.  He even apologized to Siera
for the things she heard.  She told him that she didn't like the way he
treated her mom.  She really expressed herself.  I was proud of her for
speaking up.  She was very respectful, but got her point across.  I felt
like he was only trying to make peace because he wanted some you know what.
He wasn't getting off that easy.  When we got in bed, he wanted to snuggle
up under me.  I then asked him where he had gone the other night.  He
immediately got an attitude.  I asked again and he yelled, "Why"!  He then
jumped out of the bed saying something about me questioning him as if he's
6 yrs. old.  I said, "Whatever, you've just confirmed what I feel so just
go on & get out of here."  He's so-oo stupid!  I'm his wife and can't ask
where he's been.  I should know where he is at all times.  I just really
don't have time for his mess.

So, in what area would you like to purchase a new house?  Write back.

Nytasha

                    Patrice.L.Mims
                    @enron.com            To:     IMCEANOTES-Nytasha+2ESims+40dynegy+2Ecom+40ENRON@enron.com
                                          cc:
                    10/15/01 01:18        Subject:     Re: Slow Day
                    PM

Hey girl,

What's going on?  It is truly a slow day over here.  So far, I really could
have taken the day off and would not have missed anything.  Last night I
had a date with my mother-in-law.  She's a member of a book club and they
had their 3rd annual literary Gala last night at the Omni Hotel.  It was
nice, but long.  The tickets said it started at 6:00 and I got their at
6:00.  The doggone ticket should have said cocktails at 6:00 and seating at
6:45.  I was tired of standing around waiting to be seated.  But, girl, Ms
Thang felt so good last night.  I felt like a million dollars in my
semi-formal attire.  After I left church, I went to one of my favorite
stores, Chico's, and bought myself a nice dressy top to go with my floor
length (not by design, I'm just not tall enough) black skirt.  The top that
I bought set it off so nicely.  It was black, light brown and gold!  I wore
my rhinestone choker and my rhinestone big hoop earrings, not the ones I
wear all the time, but a new pair, much mo' flashy and my black high heel
sandals that show all my foot.  Boy, I felt good about my appearance.  When
I came out of the bedroom after getting dressed, Jordan said
"Mommy.......you look pretty.  Made my evening.  Of course, Bozo the
husband, didn't say one word.  But I felt good, I even had Jordan take some
pictures of me, so we'll see how those come out (smile).

We have severe plumbng problems I discovered when I got back home, Todd
said the septic tank is stopped up, I have no idea what that really
entails, but it must of been ugly.  He was pissed!

Looking forward to rehearsal tomorrow night, speaking of rehearsal, I was
wondering where Samantha had been, and Poiter told me yesterday that she's
back in school, so that's why she's hasn't been there.

How did your evening go last night?  We still need to talk, maybe we'll get
a chance to visit tonight.  Todd already said he wasn't going to be home
until around 11:00 p.m. on Mon, Tues, or Wed, of this week, due to Power
Mart.  I said fine, have fun.  I am so bitter, I'm ready for a change too.
Right now, it doesn't seem like me and the boys would be missing much.  All
we do is coordinate our schedules to see when we can schedule different,
independent, activities.  Plus, I'm ready for a new house, clean break and
new environment.

Oh well, talk with you later!

Thanking you in advance for disregarding any and all typos!
    -----Original Message-----
   From:   Nytasha.Sims@dynegy.com@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Nytasha+2ESims+40dynegy+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]

   Sent:   Friday, October 05, 2001 10:12 AM
   To:     Mims, Patrice L.
   Subject:  Hello

   Hi Tricey!!  How is your day going so far?  Fine, I hope.  I've been
   extremely busy.  I'm glad it's Friday.  Well, Siera received her report
   card yesterday and it's not good.  I've almost cried myself into
   sickness.
   I don't know what else to do.  I've prayed and given it to God, but she
   still struggles.  We're seeking some outside tutoring right now.  The
   4th
   grade teacher at Southwest is going to tutor her.  Keep her lifted up in
   prayer.  She's pretty much given up completely.  She thinks that she's
   dumb
   and that she'll be placed in special education.  She wrote me a letter
   last
   night telling me to stop telling her that she's smart, because she's
   not.
   She said that she's dumb because her report card says so.  That hurt me
   so
   bad.

   Lil' Steve's report card was excellent.  He's doing a great job.  The
   best
   thing we could've done for him was put him at Southwest.

   How's the school search going for Jordan?

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


<Ruby.Miles@getronics.com>
HILL8314@aol.com

"Denise I. Moore" <dimoore@airmail.net> on 08/29/2000 10:19:18 PM
Please respond to dimoore@airmail.net
To: HILL8314@aol.com, iaian6@aol.com, Sherwin Johnson
<omega-one@worldnet.att.net>, Ruby Miles <Ruby.Miles@getronics.com>,
witness4him3@juno.com, Mark Solomon <msolomon@swd.ci.houston.tx.us>,
"L.awanna Limbrick" <LIMBRLM@texaco.com>, Kimberly Culbreath
<dark_lovely1913@hotmail.com>, Ethel Ford <mse238@aol.com>, Curtis Swaringam
<choirmats@aol.com>, cashley@poha.com
cc: ddavis@enron.com, cmontgomery@kmg.com
Subject: [Fwd: Fwd: FW: Fwd: Fw: Prayer]

raydoggg68@hotmail.com, rayfordabraham@att.com,dimoore@airmail.net,

Let's just give the devil a Holy Ghost Fit in the name of Jesus!
Father, bless everyone on this list in a special way, open supernatural
doors in their life today, give them a double portion of your Spirit as we
take back everything that the devil has stolen from us: Health,
Finance,Children, Jobs, Homes, Marriages.  Amen.

Let's take time to pray.
Take  60 seconds & give this a shot!
Let's just see satan stop this one.

All you do is:
1)    simply say a small prayer for the person who sent you this,
2)    then send it on to five other people... within hours five people
have prayed for you, and you caused a multitude of people to pray to God for
other people...then sit back and watch the power of God work in your life
for doing the thing that you know He loves.

God Bless You!!
Flora

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.

 - pic09863.pcx