6/1/2001 Fri

Notice: If any clients or potential clients that are getting duplicate e-mails just reply to this, and let us know and we will remove the extra recaps. If anyone feels that they may be
receiving these in error please kindly reply to have you removed from the list and we are sorry for any trouble we caused you.

Here were todays trades

"Swing" S/P full size
B 1257.50 open trade 5/31
s  1261.50 close trade 6/1
+4.0=$1,000.00
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
S 1261.50 open trade 6/1 open equity at close @ 1265.00    "trade still open"
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
E-Mini
B 1257.75 open trade 5/31
s  1261.75 close trade 6/1
+4.0=$200.00
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
S 1261.75 open trade 6/1 open equity at close @ 1265.00     "trade still open"
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mini Nasdaq
B 1829.00 open trade 5/31
s  1829.50 close trade 6/1
=break even
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
S 1829.00 open trade 6/1 open equity at close @  1851.50     "trade still open"
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

No Bonds

Commentary:

Todays price action was a real wild ride early on. Its been a long time since I have seen such a big divergence between to Fed reports in the same day, that had such a strong impact on
intra day trend changes. Today we had the Non farm Payroll numbers come in at 4.4 the market was looking for 4.6. Based on this the Bonds sold off and the Equities ran a bit to the
long side. This number was viewed as being bullish and caught a great deal of traders on the wrong side who were looking for the doom and gloom report to be short. However at 9:00 cst
the NAPM numbers showed four straight months in a row on reduced output. These numbers were 42.1 and the market was looking for 43.1. Now this time around the Bonds took off to the
moon on a flight to quality and the Equities sold off very quickly. We did go down to retest and try and take out yesterdays low of 1247.50 but this just proved to be the key support
area for the day. The wave players needed to take out 1265.00 yesterday and since they failed, the outlook was we were going down to long term support today. But again the market
fooled everyone and did its job as the best poker player around. We saw our system lifting the stops all day and we did get short late in the session after the last update at 2:30cst.

Where do we go from here? Its tough for us to see a real strong bull run Monday based on todays high at 1267.00 and the close at 3:15cst of 1265.00. We do "think" that there may be
some early am follow through but the numbers that the wave and fib traders were looking for of 1271.00-1280.00 are levels that I am not completely sold on. We are getting data today
thats leaves this open ended. So we are short and we will just play this out until Monday.

We are very pleased that the third week in May recovered all of its pull back in equity since its high of 4/27. We will show all the trade by trade recaps that were ClOSED out in May
on tomorrows E-mail. This is all CLOSED out trades. Thats trades that were entered on 4/27 and closed out in May. Today we stand at +$7,400.00 on #13 trades in the full size and the
E-mini was aprox $1,600.00 on #13 trades. Yes this is, a far cry from last months $35,000 gain in the full size. But for a month that was for the most part side ways all in all it sure
is nothing to be viewed at as a bad trading month.

For those potential clients that are following us one very important aspect of our system is that it feeds on a great deal of data that is transmitted from the cash market. And both
technical and cash data is calculated inorder to confirm trend changes.We have our computer models take a look back every hour on the half hour to re check if any trend changes have
been violated regardless of where the fututes are.

What most of the retail public has is no idea that infact all the large firms both equity's and futures have there own (platforms) and there own (systems). Its been proven that as long
as one has a sound trading methodology that is coded and it can be looked and judged over long time frames, this is the ONLY way to make gains that can show year after year. Human
intervention has created more losses in the futures markets than I care to think of. It never fails that I talk to traders every day who pound there chest on what they did "today" but
whats more important is to look at what one has done over lets say a three year time frame. This is the secret for long term success.

On the E-mail that has been sent out in the last few weeks on the new market starting 8/21/2001 "Single Stock futures" This will be very exciting for us due to the fact that we will be
one of the first firms in the country to offer this new market in a Managed program with the underlying trading methodology stemming from computer based models. The large firms will
have access to this market first then the retail public will begin 12/21/2001. As long as there are no problems that surface with the CFTC and SEC then Dec looks good.

For those of you who are not aware of the back ground of our programmers they have a history in the Futures and Equity side of the industry from institutional firms that are all
computer based with there own trading programs.

Again for those traders who are not aware of this market we will be able to trade futures on single stock issues. For example IBM will have a contract that will have 100 shares in a
contract. And that will have a life of 90 days just like the current four trading contract months per year. For more details on this market see details below.

CBOE Create Joint Venture on Single-Stock Futures World's Two Largest Equity Derivatives Exchanges to Create For-Profit Company CBOT to Join With Limited
Stake CHICAGO, May 14, 2001

 - The world's largest options exchange and the largest futures exchange in the U.S. are teaming up to introduce a highly anticipated new product - single-stock futures contracts. The
Chicago Board Options Exchange (CBOE) and Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. (CME) today signed a letter of intent to create a joint venture to introduce single-stock futures, following
approval by the boards of directors of both exchanges. The Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT) has also agreed to participate in the joint venture with a limited stake. Legislation signed
into law in December will allow the introduction of single-stock futures by U.S. financial exchanges later this year, after an 18-year prohibition on the products. "Today's
announcement highlights the innovation and entrepreneurial spirit among Chicago's exchanges," said CBOE Chairman and Chief Executive Officer William Brodsky. "This exciting new
initiative combines the best of securities and futures trading. Our willingness to work together on this venture will ensure that Chicago remains the world's center in derivatives
trading and risk management." "The creation of this joint venture recognizes the tremendous synergies of CME and CBOE, making us a formidable competitor in the global marketplace for
single-stock futures," said CME Chairman Scott Gordon. "Our complementary customer bases of retail and institutional investors will benefit from the efforts of all three Chicago
exchanges to establish deep pools of liquidity in these products." "I am enthused that Chicago's exchanges have worked so well together to understand and address our customers' needs
and our members' concerns," said CBOE Vice Chairman Mark Duffy. "We have designed a product that, I believe, will appeal to our customers, and a business structure that will provide
great benefit to our members." "Our largest customers have emphasized the importance of collaboration between the CBOE and CME to combine the capabilities, distribution and
connectivity of the futures and securities worlds," said CME President and Chief Executive Officer Jim McNulty. "This alliance should also provide the highest level of capital
efficiency for our customers who trade in both futures and options." "The CBOT is pleased to work with the leadership of CBOE and CME in this initiative to bring this exciting new
product to our markets," said Nicholas Neubauer Chairman of the Chicago Board of Trade. "The involvement of our members and the access to our customers will make important
contributions to the success of this venture." The joint venture will be a for-profit company, will have its own management and board, and will be separately organized as a regulated
exchange. Single-stock futures will be traded electronically, and orders may be entered through both the new CBOEdirectTM electronic platform and CME's GLOBEX?2 electronic trading
system. CME and CBOE officials said they are engaged in negotiations with the Options Clearing Corporation (OCC), which clears all CBOE transactions, to clear the new products. McNulty
said the negotiations contemplate CME becoming a special clearing member of OCC to provide access for CME clearing members who are not members of the OCC. The exchanges anticipate
contracting with Designated Primary Market-Makers (DPMs) in these products and expect that the board appointed to govern the joint venture will determine the eligibility criteria,
selection process, rights, privileges and duration of such arrangements. Single-stock futures are expected to bring new efficiencies to securities trading, securities lending and
corporate hedging activities. CME and CBOE officials said they also expect to develop rules that would accommodate block trading and exchange-for-physicals (EFPs). The Chicago Board
Options Exchange created and launched the first listed options on stocks in 1973 and the first index options in 1982. Today, CBOE lists options on more than 1,500 stocks and on over 40
indexes, such as the S&P 500, the Dow Jones Industrial AverageSM, the Russell 2000, the Nasdaq-100, and the S&P 100. It remains the world's largest and most successful options
marketplace. Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. launched the first successful stock index futures contracts on the S&P 500 in 1982. Today, CME trades futures and futures options on
indexes including the S&P 500, Nasdaq-100, S&P MidCap 400, Russell 2000, FORTUNE e-50? , S&P/BARRA Growth and Value Indexes, and Nikkei 225, as well as its electronically traded E-mini
S&P 500 and E-mini Nasdaq-100 contracts - the fastest growing products in the exchange's history. CME also trades interest rate, foreign currency and agricultural commodity products.
On November 13, 2000, CME demutualized and became a for-profit, shareholder-owned corporation. CBOE is regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). CME is regulated by
the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). Additional information about the CBOE and CME can be found at their respective Web sites: www.cboe.com and www.cme.com.

If anyone who would like to chat in more detail on our CTA managed accts please dont hesitate to call me at toll free (800) 773-1713

Thank you

Jerry Jacobs
C.T.A.

IF ANYONE WHO DID NOT GET THE "PDF" FILE ATTACHMENT SHOWING THE TWO AND ONE
HALF YEAR LONG TERM NUMBERS AND FULL CFTC DISCLOSURE DOCUMENT PLEASE E-MAIL
OR CALL TOLL FREE (800) 773-1713 AND WE WILL RESEND IT RIGHT AWAY

RISK DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

THE RISK OF LOSS IN TRADING COMMODITIES CAN BE SUBSTANTIAL.  YOU SHOULD THEREFORE CAREFULLY CONSIDER WHETHER SUCH TRADING IS SUITABLE FOR YOU IN LIGHT OF YOUR FINANCIAL CONDITION.  IN
CONSIDERING WHETHER TO TRADE OR TO AUTHORIZE SOMEONE ELSE TO TRADE FOR YOU, YOU SHOULD BE AWARE OF THE FOLLOWING:

IF YOU PURCHASE A COMMODITY OPTION YOU MAY SUSTAIN A TOTAL LOSS OF THE PREMIUM AND OF ALL TRANSACTION COSTS.

IF YOU PURCHASE OR SELL A COMMODITY FUTURE OR SELL A COMMODITY OPTION YOU MAY SUSTAIN A TOTAL LOSS OF THE INITIAL MARGIN FUNDS AND ANY ADDITIONAL FUNDS THAT YOU DEPOSIT WITH YOUR
BROKER TO ESTABLISH OR MAINTAIN YOUR POSITION.  IF THE MARKET MOVES AGAINST YOUR POSITION, YOU MAY BE CALLED UPON BY YOUR BROKER TO DEPOSIT A SUBSTANTIAL AMOUNT OF ADDITIONAL MARGIN
FUNDS, ON SHORT NOTICE, IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN YOUR POSITION.  IF YOU DO NOT PROVIDE THE REQUIRED FUNDS WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME, YOUR POSITION MAY BE LIQUIDATED AT A LOSS, AND YOU
WILL BE LIABLE FOR ANY RESULTING DEFICIT IN YOUR ACCOUNT.

UNDER CERTAIN MARKET CONDITIONS, YOU MAY FIND IT DIFFICULT OR IMPOSSIBLE TO LIQUIDATE A POSITION.  THIS CAN OCCUR, FOR EXAMPLE, WHEN THE MARKET MAKES A "LIMIT MOVE".  THE PLACEMENT OF
CONTINGENT ORDERS BY YOU OR YOUR TRADING ADVISOR, SUCH AS A "STOP-LOSS" OR "STOP-LIMIT" ORDER, WILL NOT NECESSARILY LIMIT YOUR LOSSES TO THE INTENDED AMOUNTS, SINCE MARKET CONDITIONS
MAY MAKE IT IMPOSSIBLE TO EXECUTE SUCH ORDERS.

A "SPREAD" POSITION MAY NOT BE LESS RISKY THAN A SIMPLE "LONG" OR "SHORT" POSITION.  THE HIGH DEGREE OF LEVERAGE THAT IS OFTEN OBTAINABLE IN COMMODITY TRADING CAN WORK AGAINST YOU AS
WELL AS FOR YOU.  THE USE OF LEVERAGE CAN LEAD TO LARGE LOSSES AS WELL AS GAINS.

IN SOME CASES, MANAGED COMMODITY ACCOUNTS ARE SUBJECT TO SUBSTANTIAL CHARGES FOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISORY FEES.  IT MAY BE NECESSARY FOR THOSE ACCOUNTS THAT ARE SUBJECT TO THESE CHARGES
TO MAKE SUBSTANTIAL TRADING PROFIT TO AVOID DEPLETION OR EXHAUSTION OF THEIR ASSETS.  THIS DISCLOSURE DOCUMENT CONTAINS AT PAGE SEVEN A COMPLETE DESCRIPTION OF EACH FEE TO BE CHARGED
TO YOUR ACCOUNT BY THE COMMODITY TRADING ADVISOR.

THIS BRIEF STATEMENT CANNOT DISCLOSE ALL THE RISKS AND OTHER SIGNIFICANT ASPECTS OF THE COMMODITY MARKETS.  YOU SHOULD THEREFORE CAREFULLY STUDY THIS DISCLOSURE DOCUMENT AND COMMODITY
TRADING BEFORE YOU TRADE, INCLUDING THE DESCRIPTION OF THE PRINCIPAL RISK FACTORS OF THIS INVESTMENT AT PAGE FIVE.

YOU SHOULD ALSO BE AWARE THAT THIS COMMODITY TRADING ADVISOR MAY ENGAGE IN TRADING FOREIGN FUTURES OR OPTIONS CONTRACTS.  TRANSACTIONS ON MARKETS LOCATED OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES
INCLUDING MARKETS FORMALLY LINKED TO A UNITED STATES MARKET MAY BE SUBJECT TO REGULATIONS WHICH OFFER DIFFERENT OR DIMINISHED PROTECTION.  FURTHER, UNITED STATES REGULATORY AUTHORITIES
MAY BE UNABLE TO COMPEL THE ENFORCEMENT OF THE RULES OF REGULATORY AUTHORITIES OR MARKETS IN NON-UNITED STATES JURISDICTIONS WHERE YOUR TRANSACTIONS MAY BE EFFECTED.  BEFORE YOU TRADE
YOU SHOULD INQUIRE ABOUT ANY RULES RELEVANT TO YOUR PARTICULAR CONTEMPLATED TRANSACTIONS AND ASK THE FIRM WITH WHICH YOU INTEND TO TRADE FOR DETAILS ABOUT THE TYPES OF REDRESS
AVAILABLE IN BOTH YOUR LOCAL AND OTHER RELEVANT JURISDICTIONS.

THIS COMMODITY TRADING ADVISOR IS PROHIBITED BY LAW FROM ACCEPTING FUNDS IN THE TRADING ADVISOR'S NAME FROM A CLIENT FOR TRADING COMMODITY INTERESTS.  YOU MUST PLACE ALL FUNDS FOR
TRADING IN THIS TRADING PROGRAM DIRECTLY WITH A FUTURES COMMISSION MERCHANT.

Global Financial
93 Partridge Dr.
San Rafael Ca. 94901
800 773-1713   fax 415 457-5088


Japan's Electricity Newspaper ("Denki Shimbun", the equivalent of Megawatt
Daily) has been running a series of articles about the new century.  Several
of these have focused on the power industry in the U.S.  A friend of mine ran
across one on Enron that was published on April 13 and sent it to me.  I
thought you would find it interesting.

The article focuses on EES in particular and about how we try to succeed by
being first to meet our clients' changing needs.  It also describes how we
use derivatives and risk management to reduce costs and stay competitive.
The article also briefly mentions the new office in Japan.

The most interesting thing about the article is how incredibly positive it is
about Enron.  Given what I have read and heard about how nervous the Japanese
are about deregulation of the industry, I really did not expect such praise.

Denki Shimbun also has a web site at "www.shimbun.denki.or.jp".  They have
small summaries of the important articles of the day (the site, however, is
completely in Japanese).  Another interesting site is
"www.criepi.denken.or.jp", the English home site of Japan's Central Research
Institute of Electric Power Industry (Denryoku Chuo Kenkyuujou).  The site
has many links to other English-language sites related to the power industry
in Japan.

Regards,

Eugenio


I think I am OK.  DF
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 04/17/2000
10:53 AM ---------------------------

Louis Soldano
04/17/2000 10:49 AM
Sent by: Jan Cobden
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, jw1000mac@yahoo.com, Susan
Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Tony Pryor/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Janet
Butler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Eric Benson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Louis Soldano/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: FERC Interconnect Policy/PG&E

How does Friday look for scheduling this meeting?  Is anyone planning to be
in the office?  If so, let me know what time will work for scheduling it.  If
not, perhaps Monday?

Jan for Lou Soldano


Reply Message:
Reply from LARA  is sure. fax number    is 202-828-3372.thanks. to
jdasovic@enron.com|Re:|
in conf. call hell.  can i

Original Message:
jdasovic@enron.com|Re:|
in conf. call hell.  can i fax for your review?


----- Forwarded by Cindy Derecskey/Corp/Enron on 12/08/2000 09:45 AM -----

	Emma Facy@ECT
	12/08/2000 03:41 AM

		 To: Jackie Gentle/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark Pickering/LON/ECT@ECT, John
Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cindy
Derecskey/Corp/Enron@Enron, Ann M Schmidt/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Katy
Lomax/LON/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Press Clippings - Enron Mention - GARY HAMEL

"Chance for Survival" - GARY HAMEL

---------------------- Forwarded by Emma Facy/LON/ECT on 07/12/2000 17:28
---------------------------


---------------------- Forwarded by Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT on 03/22/2000
01:22 PM ---------------------------

Maritta Mullet@ENRON
03/22/2000 01:06 PM
To: David Bush/ECF/Enron@ENRON, Paul Clayton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Diedrich/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Steven M Elliott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J
Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Fox/ECF/Enron@ENRON, John H Harrison/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Dan Masters/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael Mitcham/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Ina
Norman/HOU/ECT@ECT, John L Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT, James
Prentice/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Lee L Papayoti/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kerry
Roper/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Alan McGaughy/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: METHANOL PLANT UPSET

The Methanol Plant went down about 5 a.m. today.  It is expected to be down
until late Friday, March 24.


The following procedures have been developed by Walt, Mike and myself for the
Environmental matters associated with the Texas New Mexico Pipeline System.
Please pay special attention to Item No. 5 which is not only a change in
procedure but also a huge cost savings to EOTT.

We had a good visit last Thursday with the carrier.  The local representative
and our New York claim representative were present.  We were told repeatedly
that filing timely information and claim notification was required.  We
tempered their nice but stern stance with their own internal issues regarding
the change in our local representative.  All was friendly.  The bullet point
review of the meeting's discussions is as follows and there are several
procedural points that we will adopt going forward:

Expense reporting on the known and unknown sites will be filed  monthly and
the invoices will be provided also at that time.  ( providing the invoices
with the report is a change in the procedure).  I believe that I will be able
to pull the report information off of EMS Works going forward.  Please let me
know who in the organization will be responsible for getting the invoices
together so I can coordinate this process with them.
Invoices from our vendors need to be more descriptive.  Rich was in the
meeting when this was discussed and I have asked him to take this matter up
with our vendors.  In the field, if you see that the description is weak, (
for instance, "per work order") it would be helpful for you to contact the
vendor then as opposed to sending it through the payment process.  If it is
not descriptive enough to identify the work performed, payment will be
delayed and claims processing will be slowed.  This enhancement would also
seem to help us internally identify the expense.
When we are notified of a claim, be it land owner notification of an old
site, or a new spill, a spill/claim report should be filed. I believe that
this is the information that I will be receiving from EMS Works.  If it is an
issue that requires special handling, I will be happy to take this
information directly and outside the normal channels.  One area that will
need to be addressed is an estimate of claim size with each report...and an
update of that information as the claim matures if it changes materially.  I
am not clear if this information will be available in EMS Works or not.  Can
someone get back to me on this process?
As reports or correspondence from agencies/any third party are received, we
will need to forward these on to the carrier for each claim that has been
filed. Also, I will need to forward to the carrier any reports or
correspondence that we submit to agencies and third parties. The carrier does
not want to have to come to our offices to review files if it can be avoided
and would prefer to process these claims as they mature.  As you forward
these items to me for processing, please be sure that they are clearly
identifiable as to the site/claim number.
Any new claim ( that would mean any unknown) will be noticed to the carrier.
Before dispatching anyone from Entrix ( unless this is an emergency
situation),  we will notice the carrier and they will authorize the
investigation by Entrix or any other environmental consultant.  The carrier
has the right to choose who they use, however Entrix is one of  their
approved vendors.  I understand that Entrix charges us a fee for these
investigations and this is a covered expense under the policy.  This will
also aid in the processing of the claim as the carrier will accept their
requested Entrix report as their own investigative report. These charges will
be paid by the carrier, but they need to have the claim verified and then we
need to have them dispatch Entrix to the site.  I also suspect that the fee
that we have been charged by Entrix for these matters is in excess of the fee
that the carrier pays.  Therefore it is even more critical that we have the
carrier engage Entrix and pay them.  There are as I understand 38 task orders
( estimated to be $10,000/each) currently outstanding with Entrix.  I have a
copy of these and I would like to process these through the carrier where we
have not already incurred any expense.  Who can visit with me on the actual
status of any work performance under these orders?  We will need to calculate
work performed and get immediate authorization from the carrier to have
Entrix provide the service going forward for each site.
Lawsuits and paper work will be noticed to me by Legal.

As far as the action items on current updated claims:

Roger Pennifill, the technical claim handler for AIG, was in our offices
Thursday and Friday and with the assistance of Mike Kelly reviewed the files
and talked with the field personnel as needed.

The situation with Jimmie Cooper lawsuit is the top priority with the
carrier.  Cynthia Green will get back to me within a day or so to give me
feedback on the requests that we have made to authorize the fingerprinting of
the crude oil in the Cooper's well.  This matter takes precedence over the
filing an answer on the lawsuit.   Walt Zimmerman will work with Cynthia
Green on the selection of counsel for this matter.  Unless the carrier tells
us otherwise Paul Bohannon will continue to act as lead counsel for this
matter.  Walt will provide Cynthia Green with resumes for Paul Bohannon and
the local counsel that has been suggested.

The second highest priority is Jay Anthony.  We have given Cynthia and Roger
a complete write up on this situation and they will be coming back to us to
discuss the options that we have laid in front of them.

All other claims that we discussed, will be handled as their official
notification of a claim or an update as to the magnitude of the potential
problem.

In the area of site investigation (Example Clay Osborne), we will formally
ask that Entrix be approved to do the necessary  investigative work.


Kim, do you have an estimated completion date for the commodities where the
notation is that information is being compiled?  My guess would be that the
one commodity that is up-to-date (financial power) is the one with the lowest
number of transactions.  That means that the lion's share of the work is
still to be done.  Are we staffed to get this completed in a timely manner?
As I mentioned to you before, I would not hesitate enlisting Jeff Sorenson to
do much of catch up work if we are short on people to get this done
promptly.  Let me know if you need his help, and I will visit with Brent
Price.  I know that Brent would support Jeff's involvement to get his caught
up.

Who specifically will be responsible on an on-going basis to handle for the
RMT Confirmations?   Will we have some sort of report that we can send to
Stephen each month that will indicate the completion of this task so that he
is comfortable on an on-going basis that this is being kept up-to-date?
--Sally

   Kim S Theriot                12/27/2000 05:51 PM

To: Stephen H Douglas/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie
Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laurel Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila
Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rhett Jackson/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: ENA RMT Confirmations

Stephen,
As a follow-up to my earlier voicemail message, the status of the RMT
Confirmation Project is as follows:

Financial Gas:           RMT Confirmations complete through December 1999
   Bob Bowen is working on compiling the data for 2000
Financial Power:      RMT Confirmations complete through November 2000
Financial Weather
and Liquids:  Bob Bowen is working on compiling the data for 1999 and 2000
Financial FX:                       Laurel Adams is assessing the work to
compile the data for 1999 and 2000

From this point forward, the RMT Confirmation will be prepared on a monthly
basis for each commodity.

As far as the Year End RMT Project, I spoke with Bob Bowen this morning as to
the status.  What he told me was that he was supposed to receive a file
containing the deal information of the deals involved.  This was per the
meeting that he attended last week.  As of this morning he had not received
anything He stated that he was expecting the file last week but never
received any information.  He was going to follow-up with the appropriate
individual.  I will give you an update in the morning to make sure that he
has the data needed to complete the project.

If you have any further questions, please call me at ext. 31771.

Kim Theriot


Bri,

What's the deal with this Gray Davis guy?  What's your opinion on him?  He's
pretty much out to lunch on this whole energy crisis thing.  I was wondering
how
the citizens of California viewed him.

Hope everything is going well with Kim, Kendall and yourself.  Talk to you
soon.
Send an updated picture if you have one.

Kevin


Read and Write

	John Griffith (myself)
	Mike Maggi

Read Only

	John Arnold
	Larry May
	Dutch Quiqley
	John McKay
	John Disturnal

Let me know where the file resides also.  Thanks.

John


Hey, I'm no angel or English major.  Please review the attached draft email
and comment.  It will serve as the cover to Hackney with our recommended
time table.

 <<Ad Hoc Timeline Review Team >>

Thanks,

Bob

Message-ID: <C7A66C6BE090D411A4C900805FF590972F3E3A@sesoexc4.puget.com>
To: "Hackney, Mark" <mhackney@apsc.com>
Cc: ISAS Timeline Review <IMCEAEX-@exch.puget.com>
Subject: Ad Hoc Timeline Review Team
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 16:46:31 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="iso-8859-1"

Mark -

The ad hoc team's product is attached.  It is a suggested revision to the
NERC A3A1 time table for the WSCC.  Some basic points are:

*	Elimination of manually setting the WSCC pre-schedule flag.  The
table provides rules for e-tag software to automatically set the flag.

*	The majority of our efforts were focussed on creating an incentive
mechanism to encourage timely tag submission and assessment.  The team
agreed that the best incentive mechanism would be a financial one (i.e.,
tags submitted close to the deadline would pay a high submittal fee - tags
submitted early in the hour would pay little or no submittal fee - approval
entities would receive compensation for assessing/approving late tags,
etc.).  But, a financial mechanism would likely have to go through a
cumbersome review/approval process which would be too inflexible for the
fast paced world of E-Tag and NERC's electronic scheduling.  So, the
suggested incentive process increases the risk of a tag not being approved
the closer the submittal time is to the start time.  To do this, we
considered three parameters - the assessment window, deferred denial, and
the default composite status.

	*	The assessment window is a period time that the E-Tag
Authority Service gives the Approval Services to assess a submitted tag.
Each Approval Service is to check the tag for various things and respond
with a approved or denied vote back to Authority service who then set the
final composite status.

	*	Deferred denial is when a entity denies a tag, the composite
status does not immediately become Denied, but instead waits until the end
of the assessment window to set the composite status.  This allows the
denying approval entity time to reconsider their vote and change it, if
appropriate.

	*	The default composite status is a final stated reached at
the end of the assessment window when one or more approval entities fails to
actively approve or deny a tag.  Currently, tags submitted before a certain
deadline will have their final composite status default to Approved.  Tags
submitted after a certain deadline will have their final composite status
default to Denied.

	For real-time tagging, we cite the hour-ahead business where
Purchasing-selling entities trade products for delivery in the next hour.

	*	Tags submitted in the first half of the hour-ahead, referred
to 0 to 30 past, will have a 10 minute assessment window, are subjected to
deferred denial, and will default to Approved/Conditional.

	*	Tags submitted from 30 to 40 past, will have a 10 minute
assessment window, are not subjected to deferred denial (can be called
instant denial), and but will still default to Approved/Conditional.

	*	Tags submitted in the after 40 past, will have a 5 minute
assessment window, are not subjected to deferred denial (can be called
instant denial), and will default to Denied (thus assigned a composite
status of Late).

*	The table references specific times in the submittal and assessment
process which should all reference a consistant time zone standard.  The
team was divided on the best approach.  Some suggested all times on the
table be the prevailing time for the LCA.  This would require each CA to
include in the e-tag registry their time zone.  Some suggested  all times on
the table be in Pacific Prevailing Time.  And some suggested that all times
on the table be in Pacific Standard Time.  The conclusion is that a white
paper would be produced prior to the July ISAS meeting discussing the pros
and cons of each suggestion.

*	The group does not recommend basing submittal time on the tag
agent's time clock - it should stay with the authority service.

*	Here's a big one - because the timing table allows for later
submittal times, the tag assessment process is encroaching on the start of
the WSCC standard ramp (i.e., currently starts at 10 minutes before the
hour).  We are recommending that ISAS request the OC to study the
feasibility of moving the WSCC standard ramp from a twenty minute duration
straddling the hour to 10 minute duration stranddling the hour (i.e., starts
at 0:55 and ends at 0:05).  Such a change would aglign the WSCC with the
Eastern Interconnection and relieve some of the issues surrounding late tag
submittals.

I


---------------------- Forwarded by Tim Belden/HOU/ECT on 04/19/2001 08:02 AM ---------------------------

Alan Comnes
04/19/2001 07:53 AM
To:	Matt Motley/PDX/ECT@ECT, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:	Fwd: Californians for Renewable Energy, Inc. (CARE) v. BC	Hydro, et al., EL01-65

I meant to say:  maybe the expat question will be answered here ...
---------------------- Forwarded by Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT on 04/19/2001 08:00 AM ---------------------------

"Ronald Carroll" <rcarroll@bracepatt.com> on 04/19/2001 06:49:31 AM
To:	<gfergus@brobeck.com>, <ray.alvarez@ei.enron.com>, <acomnes@enron.com>, <cyoder@enron.com>, <jsteffe@enron.com>, <rsanders@enron.com>, <smara@enron.com>, <sbishop@gibbs-bruns.com>
cc:

Subject:	Fwd: Californians for Renewable Energy, Inc. (CARE)  v. BC	Hydro, et al., EL01-65

Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 07:27:07 -0500
From: "Tracey Bradley" <tbradley@bracepatt.com>
To: "Aryeh Fishman" <afishman@bracepatt.com>,	"Andrea Settanni" <asettanni@bracepatt.com>,	"Dan Watkiss" <dwatkiss@bracepatt.com>,	"Kimberly Curry" <kcurry@bracepatt.com>,	"Ronald Carroll" <rcarroll@bracepatt.com>
Subject: Californians for Renewable Energy, Inc. (CARE)  v. BC Hydro,	et al., EL01-65
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=_5D06B43C.1A7B1DE3"

FYI - Attached is a complaint filed by CARE on April 16 against BC Hydro, Powerex, Mirant and BPA (with the LADWP thrown in as an unnamed respondent).  The complaint is principally directed against BC Hydro and Powerex.  It essentially accuses BC Hydro and Powerex of manipulating the reservoirs in BC and transmission capacity reserved by Powerex on the BPA system to COB and NOB to withhold power during a period of peak demand "to contrive a shortage and test their market power."  CARE accuses BC Hydro and Powerex of violating Section 206 of the FPA, state and federal anti-trust laws, the civil rights of Californians under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and NAFTA.

The complaint is long on sensational allegations and short on facts.  The evidence proffered in the complaint consists of a rant off the YAHOO Message Board by an unnamed power trader in Spokane (we think it is an Avista trader), selected transmission data from the ISO, the LA Times article of April 11, 2001 regarding the ISO's report on Powerex, BPA and LADWP, the ISO report itself, and BC Hydro's residential rate schedule.  CARE requests FERC to initiate an investigation, seeks unspecified refunds and punitive damages and also appears to want FERC to have the Secretary of DOE declare an emergency under Section 202(c) of the FPA and compel deliveries of electricity.

FERC has noticed the complaint and has established May 8 as the due date for interventions and responses.

 - el01-65.tiff


We need to know how probable the other projects are; at what point do we
propose to put the turbines back on the market for re-sale; and what is our
best estimate of the potential downside upon re-sale.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Jacoby, Ben
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 9:47 AM
To: Schneider, Chip; Mann, Kay
Cc: Deffner, Joseph; Duran, W. David; Manis, Herman; Engeldorf, Roseann;
Bills, Lisa; Booth, Chris
Subject: RE: GE Turbines

I think we decided to take the turbine purchase approval route, and describe
the several projects (Midway et al) that we can match the turbines with. Are
you still OK with that?

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Schneider, Chip
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 9:05 AM
To: Mann, Kay; Jacoby, Ben
Cc: Deffner, Joseph; Duran, W. David; Manis, Herman; Engeldorf, Roseann;
Bills, Lisa
Subject: RE: GE Turbines

Depending upon the route we take for approval (turbine purchase vs. project
approval), the DASH process should take no more than 5 to 10 days.  How firm
are we on the Midway project?

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Mann, Kay
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 8:47 AM
To: Jacoby, Ben
Cc: Deffner, Joseph; Duran, W. David; Manis, Herman; Engeldorf, Roseann;
Schneider, Chip; Bills, Lisa
Subject: RE: GE Turbines

I think Ben's time frame is realistic. I assume we will enter into an
assignment and assumption agreement with Sithe, to which GE will consent. In
addition, we may need an override letter to the turbine contract to address
the E-Next/accounting issues. GE is familiar with what we need in for E-Next,
which should help expedite matters.

Kay

From: Ben Jacoby/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/31/2001 07:55 PM
To: Joseph Deffner/ENRON@enronXgate, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, W David
Duran/ENRON@enronXgate, Herman Manis/ENRON@enronXgate, Roseann
Engeldorf/ENRON@enronXgate, Chip Schneider/ENRON@enronXgate, Lisa
Bills/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:

Subject: RE: GE Turbines

I've been told that we need to resubmit a non-binding expression of interest
by Tuesday. Previously, we submitted a one page non-binding letter indicating
that the FMV of the units is $44 MM each. You raise a good point in that we
should be prepared to say (again, on a non-binding basis) how long we will
need to close (in addition to increasing the bid on the units). I think if
our number is good, 30 - 45 days for documentation and close would work, but
I think we should also be willing to post some non-refundable $s within say,
2 weeks on the basis of an exclusivity agreement with Sithe.

The group's thoughts on this would be appreciated.

Thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Deffner, Joseph
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 6:56 PM
To: Jacoby, Ben; Mann, Kay; Duran, W. David; Manis, Herman; Engeldorf,
Roseann; Schneider, Chip; Bills, Lisa
Subject: RE: GE Turbines

What is expected for the Tuesday bid? I would guess the most critical from a
timing perspective will be a response centered on price and
commercial/technical issues. Michael indicates below he would like a
timetable for internal approvals to a closing. Do we have any indication how
pressed he is to close and fund versus agreeing on economic terms quickly and
allowing us to review the form of contract to ensure compliance with
accounting and finance guidlelines along the lines of our discussion earlier
this week? Thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Jacoby, Ben
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 5:59 PM
To: Mann, Kay; Schneider, Chip; Bills, Lisa; Manis, Herman; Engeldorf, Roseann
Cc: Booth, Chris; Rose, Steven; Virgo, Robert; Duran, W. David
Subject: FW: GE Turbines

All:

FYI, tomorrow I should receive turbine contracts for the 3 GE 7FAs being sold
by Site. Please see the e-mail below from Sithe's advisor regarding the
transaction schedule. Kay and I plan to initially review the contract, and I
have a technical team (Booth / Rose) ready to review the contracts as well.

From an accounting / finance perspective, I am interested in how we should
proceed given the circumstances. Kay and my initial plan is to review the
contracts from a technical / legal / commercial perspective and submit a
revised indicative number by Tuesday in consultation with Duran. Between now
and then, it would be helpful to know from accounting / finance how we should
proceed given that we are in a bidding situation (with I'm told three other
bidders). Herman / Rose / Lisa - please let me know your thoughts on this.

Chip - I would like Chris Booth to work with you on putting a draft DASH
together.

In the meantime, I will forward turbine contracts to everyone as soon as I
receive them.

Regards,

Ben

 -----Original Message-----
From:  MKolman@rcgroup.com@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-MKolman+40rcgroup+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 2:40 PM
To: Ben.F.Jacoby@enron.com
Subject: Re: GE Turbines

Ben:

Per our conversation today, the turbine contract and LTSA are being sent
via Fed Ex to your office in Houston.

Final bids are due next Tuesday, June 5th via fax to 781-270-0055.  Bids
should include best price and a closing schedule (date by which bidder will
have all internal approvals necessary to enter into a binding agreement
with Seller subject only to consent from GE).

Thanks again for you patience and please call me if you have any questions,

Michael

================
Michael A. Kolman
Principal
Navigant Capital
(781) 564-9774 (direct)


Attached is list of the outstanding insurance claims provided to us by Risk
Management.  As I indicated to Rod yesterday, I have been informed that the
premiums that were paid this year were $15,000,000 and given the claims
submitted at $43,000,000, Corp is looking for a way to mitigate anticipated
rising premium costs.   They are looking very hard at Hawkin's Audit Program
to help them out.  As this list indicates, International assets should bear
the brunt of future costs.  The Transwestern train derailment will be about
$700,000 ($200k for repair and $500k for buisness interruption), both of
which will ulitmately be reimbursed by the railroad.


Hello John!  I appreciate the recommendation, but I am not in the position right now to make a move.  If they are interested in discussing a position here in the NW, I would be more interested in that.  I hope everything is going well for you.

Keep in touch!

Diana

-----Original Message-----
From: Malowney, John [mailto:john.malowney@neg.pge.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 8:08 AM
To: Scholtes, Diana
Subject: Staying in touch

Diana; last week my boss and I met with Sean regarding a position within
PG&E similar to what you're currently doing.  PG&E would be very interested
talking to you but the catch is the job is located in Bethesda Maryland.
Are you at all interested, and secondly would you and Sean consider residing
in Bethesda performing the exact same function you are both performing
today?  The second option is a long shot but I wanted to run it by you.
Hopefully you had a pleasant Holiday.   John

PG&E National Energy Group and any other
company referenced herein that uses the PG&E name or
logo are not the same company as Pacific Gas and
Electric Company, the regulated California utility.  Neither
PG&E National Energy Group nor these other
referenced companies are regulated by the California Public
Utilities Commission.  Customers of Pacific Gas and Electric Company
do not have to buy products from these companies in order
to continue to receive quality regulated services from the utility.


Harry, Marty Sunde, Jeff Dasovich and I were on a trip with Ken Lay last
week.  I understood from Marty that Ken may believe that all customers,
including direct access, should pay the increase you mention.  Marty?  This
was encouraging from a litigation exposure standpoint because, to the extent
all consumers are treated alike, our DA customers who were resourced to
utility service cannot claim to have been disadvantaged by our action.  The
converse is also true:  if they have to pay because they were put back on
utility service they may try to pass that cost through to us.  To the extent
that any increase is to pay back DWR for buying power 2/1/01-3/31/02, and
those on DA are not required to pay this, EES could have a substantial
exposure to its customers.   Maybe we need to modify our strategy to take
this into account.
 -----Original Message-----
From:  Kingerski, Harry
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 8:48 AM
To: Sunde, Marty; Benevides, Dennis; Dotson, Marcus; Williams, Robert C.;
Frazier, Lamar; Stoness, Scott; Johnson, Tamara
Cc: Lawner, Leslie; Steffes, James; Neustaedter, Robert; Mara, Susan;
Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: San Diego Update

SDGE's Advice Letter filing confirms that the ABX143 rate freeze of 6.5 cents
does not apply to direct access.

In hearings on SDGE's potential rate increase for large customers:
SDGE has proposed to allocate all retained generation to small customers
(below 100 kw).  Large customers would be served  by DWR (or be direct
access).  It's apparent several parties have major problems with this.
It is interesting that SDGE has calculated the expected rate increase under
their plan as 2.86 cents.  If large customers are allocated a piece of
retained generation, the increase goes up to 2.99 cents.  In the latter case,
large customers retain a CTC (related to QF contracts and other long term
stranded costs) that they would lose in the former case.
Our involvement is to get an order 1) excluding DA from any rate increase
(the proposed 2.86 cents) 2) excluding DA from any surcharge related to
undercollection from the rate freeze (an amount that is not known at this
point) 3) prorating the surcharge related to undercollection if the customer
switches from DA to bundled service during the rate freeze period 4) ensuring
there is a return to market pricing once the rate freeze is over.

PUC decisions on these issues are expected June 28.  There is no discussion
of restricting movement between bundled service and DA.  On our issues noted
above,  #1, 2, 4 have high probability of success; # 3 is 50/50.


All,

Once again, here are the summaries that I have prepared for the Asian
countries (Jane Wilson has promised a summary on India as well).   Any imputs
or comments are always greated appreciated.

Best regards,

Xi Xi


Start Date: 4/21/01; HourAhead hour: 17;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Generation schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042117.txt

---- Generation Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: HARBOR
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/21/01
  UNIT_ID: HARBGN_7_UNITS
$$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE.
     Details: (Hour: 17 / Preferred:   4.00 / Final:   3.53)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: SierraPowe
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/21/01
  UNIT_ID: VESTAL_6_WDFIRE


How do I get a laptop?

EM


On July 27, 2001, the Commission approved the application of Minnesota Power and Superior Water, Light and Power Company to transfer operational control of certain jurisdictional transmission facilities to the Midwest ISO when it becomes operational.  The approval was conditioned on Great River (MP's only network transmission customer) reaching agreement MP on how Great River's facilities will be operated by the ISO.

With regard to the Midwest RTO, the Commission stated its approval of the transfer of operational control does not constitute a finding regarding the scope of an RTO for the Midwest.

Please contact me if you need further information.

Susan Scott Lindberg
713.853.0596


is excel (psco) going bankrupt?  have you heard anything about that?


Thanks for your nice note.  I hope that you are having fun in your new role.
We will have to schedule lunch so that I can catch up on what you are doing
now.  --Sally

Jordan Mintz
01/15/2001 04:12 PM
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Promotion

Sally: Just a short note to congratulate you on your well-deserved promotion.
I always thought you had the toughest job in the Company; I guess everybody
else finally caught on!

Jordan


---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Knippa/HOU/ECT on 06/21/2000 02:06
PM ---------------------------

Nora Dobin@ENRON
06/21/2000 02:00 PM
To: Mark Knippa/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Gallup Letter


On Behalf of Victor Vega


Conference link: http://www.xenergy.com/denver
(If this link does not work with your email system, copy
this address into your browser)

February 20-21 in Denver

Growing Green Power Demand:
Tools, Tactics and Metrics for Accelerating Sales

In cooperation with the National Renewable Energy Laboratory
and the Center for Resource Solutions, XENERGY presents the
first green power conference devoted to the tools, tactics
and metrics of selling green power.

This is a how-to conference designed for green power program
managers to answer questions like:

- What's our score on the Green Power Index?
- How do I maximize the value of the market research I can
afford?
- Fuzzy critters, kids, windmills - what sells green power?
- Direct mail, PR, how do I reach the customers who want
green power?

Register today at http://www.xenergy.com/denver and join
your colleagues from around the globe to learn the specifics
of benchmarking green power programs, buying and using
market research, selecting sales channels and developing
message strategies and critiquing creative.  You'll leave
with a framework for marketing green power as well as tools
and tactics for selling and measuring your success.

Our featured lunch speaker February 20th will be Will Toor,
the Mayor of Boulder and Director of the University of
Colorado Student Union Environmental Center.  Mayor Toor
will speak about how each of these institutions decided to
choose green power and how green programs can best approach
these customers.

Your conference leader will be XENERGY Vice President, Julie
Blunden, a founder and former Western Regional President of
Green Mountain Energy Company.  Please click on the linked
invitation for the agenda as well as registration and hotel
information.

Register now at http://www.xenergy.com/denver

Since you'll be in Denver the week following President's
Day, we offer a couple of websites in case you'd like to hit
the slopes while you're in town!

http://www.snow.com
http://www.coloradoskicountry.com


All,

You are invited to attend an ENA Trading Track Dinner, Tuesday, October 16th ( location details to be confirmed ).

Please RSVP your attendance.

Regards,

Karen Buckley
x54667


Western Government Affairs
WEEKLY SCHEDULES
For the Week of May 14 - 18, 2001

Paul Kaufman

Mon  5/14  Portland OR office/TBD
Tue  5/15  Portland OR office/TBD
Wed  5/16  Portland OR office/TBD
Thur  5/17  Portland OR office/TBD
Fri  5/18  Portland OR office/TBD

Sue Mara

Mon  5/14  San Francisco CA office
Tue  5/15  San Francisco CA office
Wed  5/16  ARM Strategy meeting at Shell ) San Francisco CA:  9:00 a.m. -
4:30 p.m.
Thur  5/17  San Francisco CA office
Fri  5/18  San Francisco CA office

Jeff Dasovich

Mon  5/14  San Francisco CA office
Tue  5/15  San Francisco CA office
Wed  5/16  San Francisco CA office
Thur  5/17  San Francisco CA office
Fri  5/18  San Francisco CA office

Sandi McCubbin

Mon  5/14  Sacramento CA
Tue  5/15  Sacramento CA
Wed  5/16  Sacramento CA
Thur  5/17  San Francisco CA; travel to Irvine CA
Fri  5/18  Irvine CA for Dunn hearing

Mona Petrochko

Mon  5/14  San Francisco CA office; late pm: Travel to Houston TX
Tue  5/15  Houston TX office
Wed  5/16  Houston TX office
Thur  5/17  Houston TX office
Fri  5/18  Houston TX office; late pm: Travel (return) to San Francisco CA

Alan Comnes

Mon  5/14  Portland OR office
Tue  5/15  Portland OR office
Wed  5/16  Portland OR office
Thur  5/17  Portland OR office
Fri  5/18   Portland OR office


The Payment status has changed on the following report:

Status last changed by:  System
Expense Report Name: Albany NY
Report Total: $890.41
Amount Due Employee: $890.41
Amount Approved: $890.41
Amount Paid: $890.41
Approval Status: Approved
Payment Status: Paid

To review this expense report, click on the following link for Concur Expense.
http://expensexms.enron.com


Yes Kay.  It shlould be the last version from Peter Thompson of AK sent April
24th.  Tom Constantine and I just left Peter a voice mail to ask him to
resend to Tom for a double check.  I wil ask Tom to forward it to you.  I
have nothing to add to these contracts, and want to get out of the loop to
eliminate confusion.

This does not mean I will not help or answer any questions, just that Dale
has asked Tom to act in Dale's place on this, and I don't want to screw
things up....

TOM - when received or confirmed from Peter, would you please send a copy to
Kay Mann as well (as requested below).

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Mann, Kay
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 9:34 AM
To: Williams, Bill
Subject:

Could you email me the last version of the turbine contract?

thanks,

Kay


Lance and I spoke with Tim Heizenrader regarding modeling work and needs for
the West Desk.  The differences in the markets between East and West are, in
Tim's opinion, sufficient that he does not need an approach as sophisticated
as the one we are pursuing for ERCOT.  In particular, the termal limits for
which load flows are so useful are not generally binding in the West.  Loop
flows are also not considered a major issue at present.

In summary, it seems that the West is an unlikely customer of any extension
to an ERCOT/East transmission model for the time being.  They have also done
little in this area that would directly relate to our efforts here.

Martin


I think the message Christi prepared is great.  Check with her one last time
and then let it  go.
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/HOU/EES on 07/17/2000 07:54
AM ---------------------------

Mary Clark@ENRON
07/14/2000 07:51 AM
To: Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES@ECT, Maureen McVicker/HOU/EES@EES@ECT, Christie
Patrick/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: United Way

Christie, great job on Steve's message below.  Also, check with Marge Nadasky
for items from the Signature Shop that could be used as giveaways to our
group.

	From:  Christi L Nicolay @ ECT                           07/13/2000 06:03 PM

To: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Maureen McVicker/HOU/EES@EES, Christie
Patrick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: United Way

I attended the kick off and coordinator committee meetings for UW today.  The
"Who wants to help Millions" game begins next Wed. (7/19) via email.  I think
Steve could encourage participation from his group with an email sent out
Tues. 7/18 similar to this:

Subject:  Millionaire Game!

Want to have fun?  Want to get on a game show?  Want to help Millions?
Tomorrow you will receive an email that allows you to answer 15 questions via
email responses (about United Way, Enron, and other fun items).
Participation with correct answers puts you in the drawing for the employees
to represent Corp. in a "Who wants to be a Millionaire?" game that will be
played to benefit United Way on August 9.  The lucky and smart
representatives will be playing for great prizes.  I encourage your
participation in the game, but more importantly, encourage your generous
participation in Enron's United Way campaign.  Thanks for your help and HAVE
FUN!

Other items:

Corp. will be sponsoring DePelchin Children's Center through Day of Caring
and other activites during the year.  Other Enron business units will choose
other UW agencies to sponsor through activities.
We need to provide promotions/prizes for our group during the campaign.  Do
we have Enron Field tickets, dinner at Ruggles at Enron Field, use of Steve's
car, etc. that we could use for drawings a couple days after the kick off on
August 9?  We could send emails to Steve's group encouraging them to get
their pledge cards (now online) in early and draw from the early participants.


We have two additional NDA's in addition to the Live Capital one.  Any conflicts?
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Perinne, Albane
Sent:	Wednesday, September 19, 2001 2:45 PM
To:	Jones, Tana
Subject:	Re: Vendor Information

Tana-
Please note the following information:
 LiveCapital:
1900 South Norfolk Street, #115
San Mateo, CA 94403-1151
Contact: Andrew Roth
Phone: 650-350-3514
eCredit:
20 CareMatrix Drive
Dedham, MA 02026
Contact: John Geraci
Phone: 847-466-1196

eFinance:
1085 East Meadow Circle
Palo Alto, CA 94303
Contact: David Cain
Phone: 415-354-6237

Please let me know if you need any other information.  I appreciate your time and attention.
Albane E. Perinne
Enron Credit
713-345-3520 phone
713-345-4993 fax
www.enroncredit.com


Sept. 17, 2000

     Teco Tap       61.667 / HPL Gas Daily ; 25.000 / Enron

     LS HPL LSK IC       15.000 / Enron

Sept. 18, 2000

     Teco Tap       31.625 / Enron

Sept. 19, 2000

     No Flow


Molly,

We are in process of setting up an interview.

Vince

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Molly Magee                           10/18/2000 02:56 PM

To: jlew@kent.edu
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Confidential

Dr. Lew:   Vince Kaminski has asked me to contact you in connection with your
interest in Enron.   He would like to schedule a mutually convenient time for
you to visit Houston and meet with his group.   The dates that have been
suggested are:   Wednesday, 10/25/2000; Thursday, 10/26/2000; or Friday,
10/27/2000.    I hope that one of these dates will be convenient for you to
come in for interviews.

You may either respond to me by email, or phone me at 713 853-4804, whichever
is easier for you.   I am also leaving a voicemail message for you at your
home phone number.

We hope to hear from you soon.

Molly Magee
Recruiting Manager


Hi Ginger & Chris,

Hope you are doing well.  Just wanted to check in and make sure that you received the notarized copies of my INS approval.

When I spoke with Ginger a few days ago, she said that she thought we would travel 10 days or so after the Almaty group, probably in late November.

After I get off the phone I always think of  questions I should have asked.  Since my questions are not critical, but process in nature, I thought I'd drop an email.
I am unclear about the steps that need to happen between now and travel.  How long does translation take?  What happens after that?  When is the dossier sent to Kazakstan?  Typically, how much notice are people given of their Kazak court date?

I would also like to get your views on the likelihood of the process slipping such that our travel would fall over the Christmas holiday -- as that would present some childcare concerns for me back in Houston.

Sorry for so many questions.  I know that you are both very busy and I know that patience is definitely in order with this process.  I am just so very new to this international adoption process and want to make certain that I am realistic about the steps involved.

Shelley Corman
713-853-7083


As things change, so do call schedules.  We conferred and have recommend that:

There will not be a call this week.
Beginning next week, the call will take place once per week, on Wednesdays, at the same time (11:30 AM PDT), same call-in number (we hope).
Until the next legislative session starts up, the call will be optional for the gang in Sacramento.

If you have any alternative suggestions, questions, and/or comments, please let me know. And please forward to others who need/would like to know.

Best,
Jeff


Due to a system error this original email could not open the powerpoint
presentation. Please launch the attachment.

Enron Global Markets has experienced tremendous growth since inception and
this growth rate will continue to increase as new businesses and markets are
developed.  In order to ensure EGM Operations & Accounting is positioned to
provide the highest level of support and value to each EGM business unit, I
am pleased to announce the following organizational changes effective
immediately.

Physical Commodity Operations
These groups, which include Crude & Products, Coal, LNG, Freight and Weather,
are being reorganized along functional lines to provide better focus and
promote efficiencies across these operational activities.  Weather is being
included in this group to maintain the consistency of current Operations
leadership in this area.

      Business Risk Controls
Todd Hall will assume the role as Business Risk Controller on a worldwide
basis for the physical businesses.  This group will have responsibility for
all Risk Management activities and serve as the daily commercial interface
for all operational issues that affect the physical businesses.

North America Operations
Michelle Bruce will assume responsibility for the following activities that
support the physical businesses for North America:  Confirmations,
Coordination, Settlements and Trade Accounting.  Michelle and her team will
also play a key role in coordinating operational activities as they relate to
potential acquisitions and new business opportunities within North America.

Europe/Asia Operations
Cindy Horn will continue in her role managing the following activities for
the physical businesses in Europe and Asia:  Confirmations, Coordination,
Settlements and Trade Accounting.  Cindy and her team will also have the
critical responsibility of ensuring proper controls and processes are
maintained for all new and existing markets throughout the region.  Tiong
Hock Lim and his team in Singapore will report to Cindy.

Financial Commodity Operations
Sheila Glover will expand her current role and manage all business risk and
operational activities for Financial Trading and Global Risk Management.  As
the Global Risk Management business grows, Sheila will develop the
operational processes and infrastructure necessary to support it.

Todd, Michelle, Cindy and Sheila will also work together as a Controller team
to ensure processes and controls are consistent across EGM and that
efficiencies are broadly applied.

Structuring/Transaction Analysis
Scott Earnest will assume responsibility for all commodity structuring and
transaction analysis activities across EGM.  His duties will include pricing
and valuation of new transactions and businesses, evaluation of existing
transactions to identify restructuring opportunities and risk controls
monitoring and reporting.

Technology
Kevin Sweeney will continue in his role as Technology Controller.  Kevin and
his team will be completing the implementation of Project Thunderball for
Crude & Products and Coal and will also serve as the Business Leads for
system enhancements and new technology opportunities that are identified.

Financial Operations & Accounting
Tom Myers will continue in his role of managing EGM Financial Operations &
Accounting.  Tom and his group are responsible for EGM management reporting,
Plan & Current Estimate preparation, the financial close process and G/L
controls.

Please see the attached organizational chart for a more detailed look at the
changes discussed above.

   Please join me in congratulating everyone on their new assignments.


I'm a little confused - 559066 is a Prebon deal under Mike Swerzbin's book.
559091 is a Bloomberg deal under Matt Motley's book. I just talked to Mike
Driscoll and he said these both have the correct brokers on them and there
were two deals. ????

Kate

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
03/23/2001 11:55 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: 3-23 Checkout

Kate deal 559066 is identical to deal 559091.  Prebon does not recognize
559066.  Were these duplicates?

   Kate Symes @ ECT                03/23/2001 01:27 PM

To: Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: 3-23 Checkout

BLOOMBERG
Matt Motley
559091 - sells to Idaho, 50 mw, April, Mid-C, $358

Tom Alonso
559010 - price is changed to $160
He is still entering last two deals.

AMEREX
Mike Swerzbin
559062 - buys AEP, 25 mw, Cal-02, PV, $140
And Tom said he didn't have anything to do with this deal - Mike said MW were
correct.

Thanks,
kate

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
03/23/2001 11:22 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: 3-23 Checkout

BLOOMBERG

Tom Alonso
I am missing the following deals:

1) Enron sells to Tractebal 25mw Palo Verde for 3/26 peak hrs at $260.00
2) Enron sells to Pacificorp 25 mw Palo Verde for 3/26 peak hrs at $260.00

Mike Swerzbin
I am missing the following deal:

1) Enron sells to Idaho Power 50 mw April Mid-C peak hrs at $358.00

Jeff Richter
deal 559010
Bloomberg shows $160 as price......enpower has $165.00

PREBON
All were o.k.

AMEREX

Tom Alonso/Matt Motley (someone who traded on the LT PV Desk today)
I am missing the following deal:
Enron buys Cal'02 Palo Verde at $140.00  (Check the mw on this deal please
with Tom!!!)


The next AB 1890 Implementation Group meeting will be:

 Friday, August 25th
9:00 a.m. to Noon
CALIFORNIA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE -- CONFERENCE ROOM
1215 K STREET, 14TH FLOOR

PLEASE RSVP BY EMAIL OR PHONE.

As always, please contact us if you have any questions or concerns or would
like to add an issue to the agenda.

Thanks,
Delaney Hunter
Legislative Director
Smith & Kempton
(916) 446-5508


Unfortunately, I cannot attend the meetings at noon.  Jeff

Cheryl Blissitte <bliss@camh.org> on 01/17/2001 05:00:22 AM
Please respond to Cheryl Blissitte <bliss@camh.org>
To: Edward Allen <eallen@eagleglobal.com>, Bernard Arocha <barocha@msn.com>,
Ellie Beard <ecabeard@aol.com>, Toni Beauchamp <TONIBEAUCHAMP@YAHOO.COM>,
Fran Berg <fberg@swbell.net>, Deborah Brochstein <deborah@brochsteins.com>,
Brad Bucher <brad@gcchem.com>, Jeff Daly <jeffrey.daly@gs.com>, Chadwick Dodd
<cdodd@Jwortham.com>, Sara Dodd <sfpdodd@aol.com>, Heidi Gerger
<HMG60@aol.com>, William Goldberg <wgoldberg@kpmg.com>, John Guess
<jfguess@usa.net>, Rachel Hecker <ritexdog@aol.com>, Bruce Herzog
<bherzog@genesis-park.com>, Louise Jamail <RobotRob@aol.com>, Jill Jewett
<TheJewetts@msn.com>, Leonard Jones <ljones@rfp-co.com>, "I.H. Kempner III"
<ihkempner@imperialsugar.com>, Carmen Knapp <sailby2@aol.com>, Elwyn Lee
<ECLee@uh.edu>, Angela Myres <asmyres@msn.com>, Evi Newar <EviNew@aol.com>,
Roy Nolen <roy.nolen@bakerbotts.com>, Robert Palmquist
<robert.p.palmquist@us.arthurandersen.com>, Annise Parker
<aparker@cnl.ci.houston.tx.us>, Jeff Shankman <jshankm@enron.com>, Charles
Smith <RSMCES@aol.com>, Reginald Smith <rsmith@kslaw.com>, Laura Walls
<lmorwalls@aol.com>, Kenneth Williams <kmwilliams@frostbank.com>, Michael
Zilkha <michael@zilkha.com>
cc:
Subject:

Just a reminder that there is a board meeting on Monday, January 22 at 12
Noon in the Cullen Education Resource Center.

Since this is a luncheon meeting, if you have not already done so, please do
let me know TODAY if you are planning to attend or NOT ATTEND. I want to be
sure to have a box lunch for everyone who is there!


charset="iso-8859-1"
[IMAGE]

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The e-mail address you are signed up with is: paul.d.thomas@enron.com
To unsubscribe please click here :
http://bu.freeze.com/mailing/remove.asp?email=paul.d.thomas@enron.com
This email is not sent unsolicited. This is a Freeze
Network mailing! You are receiving this email as a
subscriber to a Freeze Network service. This message
is sent to subscribers ONLY.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
(FRZ4009139)


I agree.

"Conrad Neal" <cneal@bc-arch.com> on 07/26/2000 09:31:48 AM
Please respond to <cneal@bc-arch.com>
To: "'Scott Neal'" <sneal@enron.com>
cc: "'Bill Neal'" <billnealmd@hotmail.com>, "'Chris Neal'"
<chrisn@thisco.com>, "'Eric Neal'" <ericn@thisco.com>, "'John Neal'"
<muddywaters@hubserv.com>, "'Todd Neal'" <todd.neal@chron.com>
Subject: Tree Stumps Removal

Scott: Barry called me this morning and asked if we would want to get the
stumps ground of the trees removed in the yard. He said the tree man had a
relative that would do it for a $70 set up fee plus $5 per stump (approx 14
stumps). The tree man will deduct this off of what he owes us for the trees.
I told Barry to go ahead as it needs to be done and the price is right.

Dad

 - winmail.dat


I have three utililities almost ready to go; we were sorting through issues
related to Canadian regulated entities.  SS


Stanford:

My only remaining comment would be a request that the we have a week to
provide the notice we are required to give if we are unable to obtain the
exchange consents - that would mean changing the date to September 7, 2000
at the end of the sentence.

Otherwise it all looks good to me.   I will forward everything on to Mark
Holsworth for his final review - particularly with respect to the affiliates
issue.

Thanks very much for your help in getting this done.

Mark

Stanford Lin <stanford.lin@reuters.com> on 04/21/2000 04:33:36 PM
To: dave.samuels@enron.com, rahil.jafry@enron.com, julie.ferrara@enron.com,
mark.taylor@enron.com
cc: Lynne Carithers <lynne.carithers@reuters.com>, James Garland
<James.Garland@reuters.com>, Phil Lynch <phil.lynch@reuters.com>
Subject: EnronOnline.com-REVISED DOCUMENTS

Enron/Reuters Working Group:

Attached are revised Order Forms and a revised Terms & Conditions.  Please
note
the following changes:

References to "Enron Corporation" have been changed to "Enron Corp."

A termination right for the data portion of the transaction has been inserted
in
the Order Form for data.

References to "Distributor's Subsidiaries" have been added in the license
grant
in Section 4.1 of the T&C as well as in the indemnification section in Section
14 to extend the indemnification protection by Reuters to Distributor's
Subsidiaries.  Because of the wider scope of the license, a Section 16.10 has
been added to make clear that if any of Distributor's Subdiairies breach the
Agreement, Reuters will look to Enron Corp. rather than the individual
subsidiary.  The reason for this is that although Reuters acknowledges that
Enron's subsidiaries may be involved in operating the URLs, Reuters does not
want to be put in a situation in which it has to search for the relevant
subsidiary to remedy the breach.

Mark:
I hope the added language addresses your concern regarding the protection of
Enron's Affiliates and the ability of Affiliates to participate in the
operation
of URLs.  Please call to discuss if necessary (646-298-9571).

(See attached file: Enron-Investor-T&C 42100 (revised).doc)(See attached file:
Enron-Investor-NewsOrderForm 42100 (revised).doc)(See attached file:
Enron-Investor-DataOrderForm 42100 (revised).doc)

Regards,

Stanford Lin
Senior Legal Counsel

-----------------------------------------------------------------
        Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com

Any views expressed in this message are those of  the  individual
sender,  except  where  the sender specifically states them to be
the views of Reuters Ltd.
 - Enron-Investor-T&C 42100 (revised).doc
 - Enron-Investor-NewsOrderForm 42100 (revised).doc
 - Enron-Investor-DataOrderForm 42100 (revised).doc


Attached.


Hey woman, how much vacation do I have left BEFORE i fill out a timesheet for
the 2nd part of August?


yes.

	Nancy Sellers <Nancy.Sellers@RobertMondavi.com>
	02/14/2001 04:04 PM

		 To: Cameron <cameron@perfect.com>, Jeff Dasovich <Jeff_Dasovich@enron.com>,
"Prentice @ Berkeley" <PSellers@haas.berkeley.edu>, Prentice Sellers
<PSellers@pacbell.net>, Scott Laughlin <scottwl@hotmail.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: E & G Purchases of Opus One

I am going to order the last of the 12 bottle units that I can order (per
this memo below) but I do not want all 12 - do you guys want to share in this
allocation?

<<...OLE_Obj...>>

MEMORANDUM
1/24/01
* Please Post for those without Email *
TO:             Employees of Opus One, Robert Mondavi and Baron Philippe de
Rothschild
FROM:   Peter Ventura
RE:             E&G Purchases of Opus One

While demand for Opus One has grown significantly, case production has
remained level if in fact not declined-and will decline further for the 1998
vintage. This has lead to very strict allocations in the marketplace and a
need to conserve.
Please note as of March 1, 2001, for all employees and growers of Opus One,
Robert Mondavi Winery and Baron Philippe de Rothschild, purchase limits on
the current vintage of Opus One will change from twelve to six 750 ml.
bottles per person.  We expect to offer the current vintage, the 1997, until
October of this year, at which time the 1998 will be released.
Thank you in advance for your understanding and cooperation.


Dear Jim:

Thanks for the info, I had great time too with you guys, looking forward too
see you soon.

Regards

Fernando Calvillo

Tel (525) 148-67-00
Fax (525) 148-67-01


I thought it might amuse you...

texas deadhead (10:49:28 AM): texas our texas
texas deadhead (10:49:34 AM): all hail the mighty state
Miss Likki Mudd (10:49:35 AM): all hail the mighty state
texas deadhead (10:49:40 AM): texas our texas
Miss Likki Mudd (10:49:46 AM): so wonderful so great?
texas deadhead (10:49:47 AM): so wonderful so great
Miss Likki Mudd (10:49:50 AM): ah
texas deadhead (10:49:51 AM): yup
Miss Likki Mudd (10:50:00 AM): i'm moving back
Miss Likki Mudd (10:50:08 AM): i'm looking for jobs in houston
texas deadhead (10:50:09 AM): you must
Miss Likki Mudd (10:50:11 AM): seriously
texas deadhead (10:50:23 AM): seriously you must
texas deadhead (10:50:31 AM): bringing bf with you?
texas deadhead (10:50:59 AM): ...
Miss Likki Mudd (10:52:01 AM): no
Miss Likki Mudd (10:52:10 AM): i'm switching boyfriends
texas deadhead (10:52:30 AM): good
texas deadhead (10:52:35 AM): got one in mind?
texas deadhead (10:52:43 AM): or just window shopping?>
texas deadhead (10:53:06 AM): Boldest and grandest, withstanding every test
texas deadhead (10:53:23 AM): O empire wide and glorious, you stand
supremely blest
Miss Likki Mudd (10:53:24 AM): i've got one in mind
Miss Likki Mudd (10:53:46 AM): i went to houston for the weekend to see him
Miss Likki Mudd (10:53:51 AM): last weekend
texas deadhead (10:54:08 AM): is he white?
texas deadhead (10:54:13 AM): Texas, O Texas! your freeborn single star,
Sends out its radiance to nations near and far,
texas deadhead (10:54:29 AM): Emblem of Freedom! it set our hearts aglow,
With thoughts of San Jacinto and glorious Alamo.
Miss Likki Mudd (10:56:59 AM): he's white
texas deadhead (10:57:26 AM): whew
texas deadhead (10:57:32 AM): that's a relief
texas deadhead (10:57:38 AM): how do you know him?
texas deadhead (10:57:42 AM): high school boy?
texas deadhead (11:00:48 AM): is it bobbie diallard, jr?
texas deadhead (11:01:08 AM): greg linbeck?
Miss Likki Mudd (11:01:09 AM): you are funny
Miss Likki Mudd (11:01:33 AM): i actually had an email exchange with Greg
back in October
texas deadhead (11:01:43 AM): david radigan?
Miss Likki Mudd (11:01:45 AM): class of 89
texas deadhead (11:02:00 AM): 88
Miss Likki Mudd (11:02:03 AM): i dated david's older brother in high school
Miss Likki Mudd (11:02:12 AM): no, this boy i class of 89
Miss Likki Mudd (11:02:20 AM): this boy i'm moving to houston for
texas deadhead (11:02:23 AM): oh
Miss Likki Mudd (11:02:36 AM): so, start guessing from that list
Miss Likki Mudd (11:02:43 AM): b/c he's on there
texas deadhead (11:02:44 AM): pulling it up
Miss Likki Mudd (11:02:54 AM): that's how we 'got together'
texas deadhead (11:03:13 AM): ok you wouldnt move for a kobi
Miss Likki Mudd (11:03:33 AM): no
texas deadhead (11:03:39 AM): who was that one guy that mary knew from
college?  the pharmacy guy?
texas deadhead (11:03:49 AM): bill?
Miss Likki Mudd (11:03:52 AM): no
Miss Likki Mudd (11:03:54 AM): not bill
texas deadhead (11:03:57 AM): what was his name?
Miss Likki Mudd (11:04:02 AM): Bill was class of 88 anyway
Miss Likki Mudd (11:04:06 AM): Bill Lobb
Miss Likki Mudd (11:04:10 AM): i don't think he's on there
texas deadhead (11:04:26 AM): i am gonna weed first m'kay
Miss Likki Mudd (11:04:30 AM): Mary was supposed to be reacquinting me with
him
texas deadhead (11:04:45 AM): no gregs, b/c they suck
Miss Likki Mudd (11:04:56 AM): exactly
texas deadhead (11:05:10 AM): you wouldnt date a guy named christopher
christopher
texas deadhead (11:05:14 AM): so he's out
Miss Likki Mudd (11:05:18 AM): right
texas deadhead (11:05:46 AM): jennifer logsdon married a sand nigger
texas deadhead (11:05:49 AM): hmmm
Miss Likki Mudd (11:05:57 AM): lol
texas deadhead (11:06:35 AM): oops gotta run
texas deadhead (11:06:39 AM): let me think on it
texas deadhead (11:06:44 AM): i will get back to you
Miss Likki Mudd (11:06:47 AM): dammit
Miss Likki Mudd (11:06:48 AM): ok
texas deadhead (11:07:04 AM): but eugenio segovia is out
Miss Likki Mudd (11:07:13 AM): out, yes.
texas deadhead (12:22:40 PM): i'm nixing jeff barker b/c i (hope) you would
not move for someone whose "passtime" involves a four-wheeler
texas deadhead (12:25:58 PM): grant pesak is a bohunk, and your mother would
never approve
Miss Likki Mudd (12:29:26 PM): EXACTLY
texas deadhead (12:29:47 PM): derek curtiss seems kinda dorky, so i'm
scratching him
Miss Likki Mudd (12:31:04 PM): good move
texas deadhead (12:31:30 PM): jeff barker doesn't seem quite as "upwardly
mobile" as iwould picture for you, but i will keep him on the list for now
Miss Likki Mudd (12:31:57 PM): ok
texas deadhead (12:32:20 PM): no info on don baughman... he stays on the
list for now too
Miss Likki Mudd (12:32:35 PM): ok
texas deadhead (12:33:06 PM): as do steve brown and brad chambers
Miss Likki Mudd (12:33:14 PM): lol
texas deadhead (12:33:27 PM): what?  which one's gay?
Miss Likki Mudd (12:33:49 PM): neither as far as i know
Miss Likki Mudd (12:34:01 PM): i don't know Steve Brown
Miss Likki Mudd (12:34:19 PM): and Brad's a little annoying
texas deadhead (12:34:20 PM): REVISION: scratch steve brown
Miss Likki Mudd (12:34:26 PM): of course
Miss Likki Mudd (12:34:31 PM): i'm giving too much away
texas deadhead (12:34:33 PM): so am i
texas deadhead (12:34:37 PM): but you love me
Miss Likki Mudd (12:34:43 PM): of course
texas deadhead (12:35:24 PM): ok... here's what may throw me off... i have
eliminated all of these men that have spread their seed
texas deadhead (12:36:38 PM): b/c although i know you want kids... i assume
you want your own
Miss Likki Mudd (12:36:39 PM): good idea
Miss Likki Mudd (12:36:57 PM): yes.  i don't need to raise some other
whore's kids.
texas deadhead (12:37:05 PM): zacly
texas deadhead (12:37:33 PM): eddie ferguson... out
Miss Likki Mudd (12:37:50 PM): out
Miss Likki Mudd (12:37:56 PM): don't know him
texas deadhead (12:39:14 PM): boy... Miss Lee Lindsey's really doing well
for herself
Miss Likki Mudd (12:39:40 PM): i don't know who that is
texas deadhead (12:40:04 PM): well, go down to the Fillin Station in alvin
and get to know her
Miss Likki Mudd (12:40:22 PM): hmm.
texas deadhead (12:42:03 PM): did you smoke pot in HS?
Miss Likki Mudd (12:42:26 PM): just a few times
texas deadhead (12:42:36 PM): but you did at some point?
Miss Likki Mudd (12:42:54 PM): yes.
texas deadhead (12:42:55 PM): ok then... trent stephens stays on the list
Miss Likki Mudd (12:43:08 PM): why?
texas deadhead (12:43:18 PM): he played soccer
texas deadhead (12:43:28 PM): soccer player = pot smoker
Miss Likki Mudd (12:43:31 PM): oh.
Miss Likki Mudd (12:43:33 PM): ok.
Miss Likki Mudd (12:43:41 PM): lol
texas deadhead (12:44:21 PM): ever see shawn weaver up in denver?
Miss Likki Mudd (12:44:26 PM): no
texas deadhead (12:44:51 PM): did you ever blow bubbles when you were
little?
Miss Likki Mudd (12:44:59 PM): of course
texas deadhead (12:45:11 PM): well he's back in town and wants your phone
number
Miss Likki Mudd (12:45:52 PM): right.
Miss Likki Mudd (12:46:00 PM): they all want my phone number.
texas deadhead (12:47:00 PM): keathe david is out.  i think you'd have a
hard time getting over the way he spells his name
Miss Likki Mudd (12:47:29 PM): exactly
Miss Likki Mudd (12:47:31 PM): lol
texas deadhead (12:49:39 PM): do you remember who's still on my list?
texas deadhead (12:49:40 PM):  LOL
texas deadhead (12:49:49 PM): shoulda wrote it down
Miss Likki Mudd (12:49:55 PM): scroll up
Miss Likki Mudd (12:50:09 PM): it's not a long list
Miss Likki Mudd (12:50:15 PM): you ruled a lot of people out
texas deadhead (12:51:22 PM): hmmm don baughman, matt reid,
texas deadhead (12:52:49 PM): trent stephens
texas deadhead (12:52:54 PM): still listing
Miss Likki Mudd (12:53:42 PM): ok
texas deadhead (12:54:50 PM): 'bobby limm (still list)
Miss Likki Mudd (12:55:09 PM): mkay
texas deadhead (12:56:21 PM): brad chambers (listy)
texas deadhead (12:56:30 PM): never mind
Miss Likki Mudd (12:57:24 PM): good idea
texas deadhead (12:57:33 PM): im going with matt reid on gut
texas deadhead (12:57:38 PM): WAG method
Miss Likki Mudd (12:58:10 PM): wag?
texas deadhead (12:58:16 PM): wild ass guess
Miss Likki Mudd (12:58:40 PM): i think matt reid was this big chubby kid on
my brother's baseball team
texas deadhead (12:58:41 PM): i narrowed it to 4 and then i had to guess
texas deadhead (12:58:49 PM): who then?
Miss Likki Mudd (12:59:04 PM): i'm very impressed b/c he's on your list
texas deadhead (12:59:09 PM): i know
texas deadhead (12:59:11 PM): who ?
texas deadhead (12:59:15 PM): trent?
Miss Likki Mudd (12:59:21 PM): yes
texas deadhead (12:59:46 PM): i think i know you pretty good
texas deadhead (12:59:58 PM): not perfect
texas deadhead (1:00:12 PM): but pretty good
texas deadhead (1:00:28 PM): by the way, you owe my company 400 dollars
texas deadhead (1:00:32 PM): LMAO
Miss Likki Mudd (1:01:04 PM): why?
texas deadhead (1:01:10 PM): and the whole "pot" thing was just to be funny
texas deadhead (1:01:17 PM): why 400 bucks?
texas deadhead (1:01:36 PM): cost of my lost man hours trying to guess your
boyfriend
Miss Likki Mudd (1:01:51 PM): right.
Miss Likki Mudd (1:02:15 PM): if you weren't playing guess lisa's love
interest, you would've been wasting time another way anyway
texas deadhead (1:02:41 PM): mean
texas deadhead (1:03:27 PM): trent the dope smoking soccer boy
texas deadhead (1:03:36 PM): did you play tennis in HS?
Miss Likki Mudd (1:03:42 PM): why, yes i did
Miss Likki Mudd (1:03:56 PM): and i was soccer manager one year
texas deadhead (1:04:04 PM): so have you dumped your CO man?
Miss Likki Mudd (1:04:09 PM): i didn't want to throw things off
texas deadhead (1:04:27 PM): i cant believe AAAlvin had a soccer team
Miss Likki Mudd (1:04:43 PM): right.  no CO man.
texas deadhead (1:05:24 PM): "I was a 'pussy wagoneer' for you, and now
you're DUMPING me???"
texas deadhead (1:05:32 PM): musta been hard
Miss Likki Mudd (1:07:25 PM): he did not participate as a Pussy Waggoneer
texas deadhead (1:07:43 PM): oh
texas deadhead (1:31:13 PM): lisa and trent
texas deadhead (1:31:17 PM): sittin in a tree
Miss Likki Mudd (1:45:04 PM): you're silly


Louise,

Here is a soft copy of the original inception document from 10/30/2000.

Cheers, d.n.


Well Now - how interesting - - They were cute.


Brant:
Let me know what you think about this.  I am enclosing the section out of our
comments that he wants to replace with his language.
Carol

----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 06/12/2000 04:24 PM -----

	<Mike_Pate@oxy.com>
	06/12/2000 02:00 PM

		 To: Carol.St.Clair@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: ISDA Discussions

June 12, 2000

Carol:

While I am still in the process of going through your mark-up, one item that
could move this along considerably is your consideration of the attached in
lieu of your addition of subpart (x) in your Insert 2.  While it
incorporates the same concept, it is a slightly different approach.

 <<Additional Termination Event.doc>>

Mike

Michael L. Pate
Occidental Energy Marketing, Inc.
Houston: (713) 215-7041
Tulsa:  (918) 561-4541

THIS COMMUNICATION IS ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INTENDED RECIPIENT.  IT
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION AND TRADE SECRETS OF OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM
CORPORATION, AND MAY BE ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGED OR CONTAIN ATTORNEY WORK
PRODUCT.  UNAUTHORIZED USE, DISTRIBUTION, OR DISCLOSURE IS PROHIBITED.  If
you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender by return
e-mail at mike_pate@oxy.com <mailto:mike_pate@oxy.com> .

 - Additional Termination Event.doc


I look forward to meeting with you both on Tuesday.  Here's a list of the
funds we have in the pipeline and the status:

MACRO FUNDS-
1.Harvard (Docs done)- We have been dealing with them in crude, products, and
natural gas- we just need to keep track of their credit line.

2. Tudor- we have docs with Ospraie, Tudor Proprietary, Tudor Offshore
(Bermuda)- dealing regularly..

3. Catequil (Negotiating) docs with Offshore and Onshore- waiting for
response from Brent and Paul on their latest comments to the ISDA.  Confirms
from all the deals we have done have been returned to Carol.  They are set up
in the system; we hold margin.

4. AIG (Negotiating)- Offshore, Onshore- need to get documents out to them-
credit work sheet in legal.. still have not gotten out a confirm to them on
the trades they have done....we have them set up in the system and hold
margin.

5. Union Spring (Negotiating)- Offshore, Onshore- should be done on this one.

6. SAC Capital - possibly only one vehicle in Anguila- need to get the
document to them- credit work sheet in legal.

7. Quark Power (Negotiating)- 2 entities- Quark Power and Amaranth.  Held by
Paloma Partners- waiting for their comments on a few points.

8. Valentis and CD Holdings- Held by Wexford Capital - need to get document
to them- credit work sheet in legal.  They want to proceed with the 8 year
deal Monday.

9. Global Advisors- trade through Cargill.. Frank Sayre working on POA..
waiting for this back.

10. Argonaut- onshore, offshore vehicles- sending documents.. no credit
assessment yet.

11. SOROS- brought through system by credit derivative group.. but need a
credit opinion for ENA (to do energy trades).

PROGRAM FUNDS-
12. Renaissance - credit worksheet in legal- need to get docs to them.
13. Campbell+ Co - will likely want to look at a three way transaction
between Enron, themselves, and a bank
14. Sunrise Capital - getting documentation.


i am tired.  your dog kept me up all night.


Please let me know of any corrections.
--Stinson

Teams reporting to Krishna, Tanya,  Mike, and Maureen have no changes.

ENA/EGM/EIM support to be primarily organized by type of support rather than
by business line under Stinson and Vasant:

Stinson
(EBS)
Martin Lin(*),  Shalesh Ganjoo, Chonawee Supatgiat, Iris Mack
(Option Pricing)
Zimin Lu,  Alex Huang, Tom Halliburton,  Bob Lee,  Paulo Issler,  Ken
Parkhill,  Tom Barkley, Hector Campos

Vasant
(Power)
Martin Lin(*),    Lance Cunningham,    Sevil Yaman
(Risk and Market analysis)
Amitava Dhar,    Joe Hrgovcic,    Nelson Neale,   Kate Lucas

(*) Martin to have the option of maintaining ties to EBS or to gradually move
to mainly power fundamentals.


To the trading lawyers working on counterparty lists:

Per the email below from Louise, the current target date for completion of
counterparty lists appears to be Tuesday, October 12.  As noted below, an
additional list of approved counterparties should be provided to us tomorrow.

FYI, per my conversations w/Frank Davis, the first simulation occurred this
week, and an additional simulation is scheduled for next week.
---------------------- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 10/07/99 09:54 AM
---------------------------

Louise Kitchen
10/06/99 02:46 PM
To: Mark E Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Port/LON/ECT@ECT, Bob Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Forster/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Customer Data

On Friday we will be receiving the remaining customer list from credit, due
to the timescales I am asking for turnaround on the customer matrix and
master agreement review by the end of play Tuesday 12th October.

Any problems with this please notify me immediately as we are now running up
against very tight deadlines in terms of getting all of the information in
the system for the launch schedule.

Thanks

Louise

Mark,
On another note we are requesting a review of the blanket decision which has
been made to prevent any regulated utility from completing any financial
transactions, if we are not prepared to do the due diligence on which ones
can transact and which ones can not - is this our responsibility or theirs?
ie their decision whether to trade or not.
Louise


Jared,
 My only comment is that the three references to Enron North America need to
be changed to Enron North America Corp.

	Jared Kaiser/ENRON@enronXgate
	06/12/2001 09:30 AM

		 To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: CA for OUC

Dan,

Ned Crady has reviewed a form of this document earlier.  In this OUC specific
copy, I have included ENA.  Phil DeMoes and I are discussing a potential deal
with OUC for delivered natural gas into Florida, either via existing
infrastructure or LNG.  Please review and provide comments.

Jared
Feel free to call with any questions.
345-2765


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 02/01/2000
03:59 PM ---------------------------

"James R. Garven" <jgarven@lsu.edu> on 02/01/2000 12:41:20 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: LSU seminar visit

Dear Vince,

I just left voice mail for you.  We are interested in obtaining copies of
the papers you'll be using as the basis for your presentations on Thursday
and Friday so that we can get these materials distributed.  Can you call me
at 225-388-0447 so we can discuss this?  I would also like to be able to go
over the schedule with you just to make sure that we are on the same page.

Thanks for taking the time to visit us.  We are looking forward to your visit.

Sincerely,

Jim Garven

_________________________________________
James R. Garven
William H. Wright, Jr. Endowed Chair for Financial Services
Department of Finance
2158 CEBA
E. J. Ourso College of Business Administration
Louisiana State University
Baton Rouge, LA  70803-6308

Voice (225) 388-0477  |  Fax: (800) 859-6361

E-mail:  jgarven@lsu.edu
Home Page: http://garven.lsu.edu
Vita: http://garven.lsu.edu/dossier.html
Research Paper Archive: http://garven.lsu.edu/research.html
_________________________________________
 - att1.htm


Hook 'em!


Insert at p. 42 as ARTICLE XII.

ARTICLE XII.
ADJUSTMENTS REGARDING UNITS WITH
SERIAL NUMBERS LISTED IN EXHIBIT P

12.1 Adjustments in Performance Guarantees to Reflect Site Conditions.
Seller recognizes that the Sites for the Units identified and listed by
serial number in Exhibit P have not been identified by Purchaser.  When the
Site for each such Unit has been identified and the corresponding Site
conditions for each such Unit has been provided by Purchaser to Seller,
Seller and Purchaser agree to amend the Guaranteed Levels and the Specific
Performance Levels for each such Unit to reflect changes in the Basis
Conditions made to reflect the Site conditions for each such Unit.  The
Guaranteed Levels and Specific Performance Levels as so amended will be
consistent with those customarily provided by Seller for other LM 6000
Enhanced  Sprint combustion turbine generator units in the United States with
comparable Site conditions.
12.2 Storage of Unit(s).  Seller and Purchaser recognize and agree that the
period or periods during which any of the Units identified and listed by
serial number in Exhibit P is placed in storage (a) by Seller pursuant to
Section 10.2.7 or (b) by Purchaser, as agreed between Seller and Purchaser,
shall not be considered, directly or indirectly, in determining the
commencement of the Primary Warranty Period or the Extended Warranty Period,
or both.
12.3 Maximum Period of Seller Liability.  To the extent any Unit identified
and listed by serial number in Exhibit P is placed in storage as contemplated
in Section 12.2, the duration of such storage period shall be added, in the
case of each such Unit, to the six (6)-year period identified in the last
sentence of Section 27.1 for purposes of calculating the maximum duration of
Seller's liability with respect to any such Unit and with respect to this
Agreement.
12.4 No Effect on Cost, Schedule or Scope of Work.  Seller and Purchaser
agree that implementation of the provisions and agreements of this Article
XII shall be at no additional cost or result in any other change or impact to
or upon the Scope of Work, Purchase Amount or Guaranteed Unit Delivery Dates,
or all of them.


John,

Thought you might enjoy a little entertainment...

Alex has sent you something special that is sure to make your day!

Click on the link below, or copy-and-paste the link into your browser:
http://www.passitaround.com/passit.pd?i=250360203&m=9569&rr=y&source=passit999

Have a great day!


Dave,

Attached please find my comments to the above-referenced Agreement.  Please
call me with any comments or questions.

Jason


I will be leaving the office today at 2:15 to take the kids in for their flu
shots.

Samantha M. Boyd
Sr. Legal Specialist
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith, EB3802A
Houston, TX  77002
Phone:  (713) 853-9188
Fax:  (713) 646-3490
email:  samantha.boyd@enron.com

__________________


Please see the attached which (I think) describes the improvements in Section
16 of the Quantum deal.

In my (non-legal) opinion, if we include this document with the scematic of
the collection facilities in Exhibit B or C of the Purchase/Gath documents,
then will this suffice for Exhibit B of the Mortgage Agreement?

Thanks.

Dan
---------------------- Forwarded by Dan J Bump/DEN/ECT on 04/07/2000 10:40 AM
---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  JCMMCMI@cs.com                           04/07/2000 10:08 AM

To: dbump@enron.com
cc: dkg@enernetok.com
Subject: real property description, bonepile gas gathering system

Dan,
Attached Word 97 document is the real property description file.

If you have any questions, please call me at (405) 826-2604 (cellular) or
Doug Garrett at (405) 235-4968.

John McBryde
Consultant to Enernet of Wyoming, L.L.C.

 - description of real property bonepile gas gathering system.doc


Over the past few months, Enron Global Finance has been evaluating various opportunities where Enron and Smith Graham & Company may be able to work together.  Unfortunately, the process was slowed when our primary contact at Smith Graham, Gabriel Hayes, left the firm earlier this year.  We have since reestablished discussions and the Global Finance Group is preparing a proposal that a portion (about $30 million) of the Enron Cash Balance Plan portfolio be dedicated to an emerging managers portfolio.  One-third of this money ($10 million) would be invested in bonds, which could be placed with Smith Graham, as the fixed-income manager .  (Total Plan assets are about $235 million.)

The proposal will be submitted to the Plan Administrative Committee at its quarterly meeting on May 3rd.  The proposal should be well received as the Committiee has previously requested that  we optimize our existing allocation to minority money managers.  Gerald Smith has been advised that Enron is looking at ways to allocate money to the firm, and that a decision should be reached sometime in May.  We have not communicated the specific details of our intentions as of yet pending the outcome of the May 3rd meeting.

I am available for further discussion at your convenience.

Regards,
Tim DeSpain
(x31770)


This is great!!!!

Can you believe all that is going on in Sunny Florida?  I called Nat/Laura to
get their take on the mayhem, but I haven't been able to talk with them.  I
got a voice mail from Laura that Jesse Jackson was leading a demonstration up
the street from their house!  They are right in the thick of it.

Later.  MHC

Cheryl.Brinkman@mckhboc.com on 11/15/2000 06:02:01 PM
To: earentz@online.no, jodie.baldwin@excite.com, gerald@iii.co.uk,
michelle.cash@enron.com, coffin@jacobssf.com, cbrinkman@msn.com
cc:
Subject: Notice from England

yes, forwarding a joke - I'm sorry, but it's pretty good.

Cheryl

> To the citizens of the United States of America...
>
> In the light of your failure to elect a President of the USA and thus to
> govern yourselves, we hereby give notice of the revocation of your
> independence, effective today.
>
> Her Sovereign Majesty Queen Elizabeth II will resume monarchial duties
> over all states, commonwealths and other territories. Except Utah, which
> she does not fancy. Your new prime minister (The Rt. Hon. Tony Blair, MP
> for the 97.85% of you who have until now been unaware that there is a
> world outside your borders) will appoint a minister for America without
> the need for further elections. Congress and the Senate will be
> disbanded.
>
> A questionnaire will be circulated next year to determine whether any of
> you noticed.
>
> To aid in the transition to a British Crown Dependency, the following
> rules are introduced with immediate effect:
> 1. You should look up "revocation" in the Oxford English Dictionary.
> Then look up "aluminium" . Check the pronunciation guide. You will be
> amazed at just how wrongly you have been pronouncing it. Generally, you
> should raise your vocabulary to acceptable levels.  Look up
> "vocabulary". Using the same
> twenty seven words interspersed with filler noises such as "like" and
> "you know" is an unacceptable and inefficient form of communication.
> Look up "interspersed" .
>
> 2. There is no such thing as "US English" . We will let Microsoft know
> on your behalf.
>
> 3. You should learn to distinguish the English and Australian accents.
> It really isn't that hard.
>
> 4. Hollywood will be required occasionally to cast English actors as the
> good guys.
>
> 5. You should relearn your original national anthem, God Save The Queen,
> but only after fully carrying out task 1. We would not want you to get
> confused and give up half way through.
>
> 6. You should stop playing American football. There is only one kind of
> football. What you refer to as American football is not a very good
> game.  The 2.15% of you who are aware that there is a world outside your
> borders may have noticed that no one else plays American" football. You
> will no longer be allowed to play it, and should instead play proper
> football. Initially, it would be best if you played with the girls. It
> is a difficult game.
>
> Those of you brave enough will, in time, be allowed to play rugby (which
> is similar to American football, but does not involve stopping for a
> rest every twenty seconds or wearing full kevlar body armour like
> nancies). We are hoping to get together at least a US rugby sevens side
> by 2005.
>
> 7. You should declare war on Quebec and France, using nuclear weapons if
> they give you any merde. The 98.85% of you who were not aware that there
> is a world outside your borders should count yourselves lucky. The
> Russians have never been the bad guys. Merde is French for "shit".
>
> 8. July 4th is no longer a public holiday. November 8th will be a new
> national holiday, but only in England. It will be called Indecisive Day.
>
> 9. All American cars are hereby banned. They are crap and it is for your
> own good. When we show you German cars, you will understand what we
> mean.
>
> 10. Please tell us who killed JFK. It's been driving us crazy.
>
> Thank you for your cooperation.
>


On term server 2 again?

Michael S. Tully
michael.tully@enron.com
Application Support, Portland
(503)464-7790 Desk
(503)807-7862 Cell

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Salisbury, Holden
Sent:	Tuesday, August 14, 2001 7:18 AM
To:	Tully, MIchael
Subject:	RE: Terminal Server2 / Curve Manager

FYI,

We seem to be having this problem again.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tully, MIchael
Sent:	Friday, August 10, 2001 2:31 PM
To:	DL-Portland World Trade Center
Subject:	Terminal Server2 / Curve Manager

The problem reported earlier with Terminal Server 2 and Enpower's Curve Manager have been fixed.

Michael Tully
Application Support, Portland
(503)464-7790 Desk
(503)807-7862
michael.tully@enron.com


Amy Oberg's brown bag, Coming Full Circle: A Plausible Future for Power
Generation has been cancelled.
We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.  Please keep watching for
future brown bags.


Please find the attached EES Volumetric NYMEX and Basis positions for
8/4/2000.   I expect our position to be about 104 contracts longer on Nymex.

Thanks,

Monica Hwang


Virginia,

We didn't have any interest in the piece.   I am interested in the following
lithos.  1. a signed Bonnard (no black and whites) and 2. a Toulouse LeTrec
(awful spelling).  Let me know if you locate some choices on those two.

Thanks,
mike