----- Forwarded by Brent Hendry/NA/Enron on 10/16/2000 11:41 AM -----

	Dale Neuner@ECT
	10/11/2000 04:31 PM

		 To: Amita Gosalia/LON/ECT@ECT, Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT, Brent
Hendry/NA/Enron@Enron, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, William
Stuart/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Blumenthal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shane Dallmann/LON/ECT@ECT,
Jason Althaus/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mark Dilworth/LON/ECT@ECT, Janine
Juggins/LON/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer deBoisblanc Denny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert
B Cass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melba Lozano/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: FX Issues

This e-mail is admittedly long, so I have classified the issues:

Legal/Tax Issue:

I have been told by the FX group here in Houston that London traders are able
to act on the behalf of the US FX Desk because the transactions they do are
for hedging purposes only (no proprietary trading). For example, the FX
transactions that are done by Trena McFarland in London are done on the
behalf of our Houston office, so Houston books the transaction, manages the
risk, and writes the Confirmation in the name of ENA.

This being the case, (i) can we apply the same logic on the internal FX
transactions that will be managed by both the US and UK traders and have the
transacting entity as ENA (ii) if we do does it gives us the necessary tax
relief, or (iii) should we stick the Metals structure where the transactions
are offered by Enron North America, acting through it's agent, Enron Europe
Finance and Trading Limited. While this may be an Internal Only Product Type
today, what effect, if any, would the choice of trading entities have on our
ability to offer these Products externally.

Technology Issue:

David - Stuart has explained to me that the US FX Desk now views these
currency exchange products as financial products. This is contrary to
previous discussions where we felt that any currency exchange involving an
Index would be considered financial, while any 'strict exchange' would be
considered a physical transaction. The change is based on conversations
Stuart has had with the Metals traders wherein they would like to see this
exchange product as a financial product. If we accept this logic, (i) do I
need to create a Deal Type for 'Par Forward Swap' for the first FX Index
Product Type that we did as well as a 'Forward Swap' for these transactions,
or is it acceptable to leave these both as swaps, and (ii) regardless of the
Deal Type classification discussed in (i), I will need to create a new
Product Type for the 'strict exchange' - either as a physical or financial
product. Additionally, if I set this up as Financial Product, I have the
Index attribute in the template to contend with, because there is no Index;
and if I set this up as a Physical Product, I have the Location attribute to
contend with, because there is no Location. Naturally we can put something
cheesy in to fill the gap since it's internal, but if we ever decide to go
external we will need a new template - and from experience with the PJM Power
(Weather Desk) Product Type, templates requires an 'and if' statement are
hard to develop.

Dale


Please replace my name (Paul M. Radous) for my brother's (Kevin P. Radous) on
this distribution list.  Thanks.

---------------------- Forwarded by Paul Radous/Corp/Enron on 04/19/2000
05:06 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Veronica Espinoza                           04/19/2000 04:37 PM

To: Paul Radous/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Kellogg Company

---------------------- Forwarded by Veronica Espinoza/Corp/Enron on
04/19/2000 04:35 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Tana Jones @ ECT                           04/19/2000 04:29 PM

To: Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jefferson D Sorenson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laurel
Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrea R Guillen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Willie Harrell/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melba Lozano/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris
Walker/HOU/ECT@ECT, David P Dupre/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pamela Sonnier/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jarrod Cyprow/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheetal Patel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gordon
Heaney/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Souad Mahmassani/Corp/Enron@ENRON, William S
Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nidia
Mendoza/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rod
Nelson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tracy Ngo/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Suttle/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lesli
Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Molly Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin P Radous/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Veronica Espinoza/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Brent
Hendry/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Marie Heard/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara
Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shari Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Susan Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan
Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Solmonson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marilyn Colbert/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Yolanda Cordova-Gilbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diane Ellstrom/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lynn E
Shivers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill D Hare/HOU/ECT@ect, Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jason Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dianne Seib/CAL/ECT@ECT, Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Anthony Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary G
Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Connie Sutton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank L
Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carrie Southard/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amber Ebow/HOU/ECT@ECT, Adnan
Patel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Elliot Bonner/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Kellogg Company

We have received the following executed Master Agreement:

Type of Contract:   ISDA Master Agreement ( Multicurrency-Cross Border)

Effective Date:  March 31, 2000

Enron Entity:  Enron North America Corp.

Counterparty:  Kellogg Company

Transactions Covered: Approved for all products with the exception of:
Weather and foreign exchange


----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 01/31/2001 04:16 PM -----

	Scott Govenar <sgovenar@govadv.com>
	01/31/2001 12:13 PM

		 To: Hedy Govenar <hgovenar@govadv.com>, Mike Day <MDay@GMSSR.com>, Bev
Hansen <bhansen@lhom.com>, Jeff Dasovich <jdasovic@enron.com>, Susan J Mara
<smara@enron.com>, Joseph Alamo <JAlamo@enron.com>, Paul Kaufman
<paul.kaufman@enron.com>, David Parquet <David.Parquet@enron.com>, Rick
Johnson <rick.johnson@enron.com>, Marcie Milner <mmilner@enron.com>, Sandra
McCubbin <Sandra.McCubbin@enron.com>, Tim Belden <Tim.Belden@enron.com>, Rick
Shapiro <rshapiro@enron.com>, Jim Steffes <james.d.steffes@enron.com>, Alan
Comnes <acomnes@enron.com>, Chris Calger <ccalger@enron.com>, Mary Hain
<mary.hain@enron.com>, Joe Hartsoe <Joe.Hartsoe@enron.com>, Donna Fulton
<Donna.Fulton@enron.com>, Steven Kean <Steven.J.Kean@enron.com>, Karen Denne
<kdenne@enron.com>, Beverly Aden <beverly.aden@enron.com>, Bill Votaw
<bill.votaw@enron.com>, Carol Moffett <carol.moffett@enron.com>, Debora
Whitehead <debora.whitehead@enron.com>, Dennis Benevides
<dennis.benevides@enron.com>, Don Black <don.black@enron.com>, Dorothy
Youngblood <dorothy.youngblood@enron.com>, "dblack@enron.com"
<dblack@enron.com>, "emelvin@enron.com" <emelvin@enron.com>,
"ehughes2@enron.com" <ehughes2@enron.com>, "gweiss@enron.com"
<gweiss@enron.com>, "gsavage@enron.com" <gsavage@enron.com>,
"Harry.Kingerski@enron.com" <Harry.Kingerski@enron.com>, "kgustafs@enron.com"
<kgustafs@enron.com>, "msmith1@enron.com" <msmith1@enron.com>,
"ryang@enron.com" <ryang@enron.com>, "sgahn@enron.com" <sgahn@enron.com>,
"vsharp@enron.com" <vsharp@enron.com>, "wcurry@enron.com" <wcurry@enron.com>,
"William.S.Bradford@enron.com" <William.S.Bradford@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: ABX 1

ABX 1 passed out of the Senate on a vote of 27-8.  Three Republicans
voted for the bill, one Democrat against.  The bill will be heard on the
Assembly floor later today.

Senator Bowen has requested that we provide her with legislative
language regarding direct access for her clean-up legislation.  Senator
Bowen made a commitment on the Senate floor that she would try to
resolve the issue in future legislation.

In anticipation of the clean-up legislation, we held a meeting this
afternoon with the following groups to try and come to some consensus
regarding direct access:

California Manufacturers and Technology Association
Building Owners and Managers Association
California State University
University of California
California Chamber of Commerce
New Energy
AES
Association of Retail Marketers
California Healthcare Association
GreenMountain
California Large Energy Consumers Association
California Retailers Association
California Grocers Association

The following groups could not attend today's meeting, but they
expressed an interest in participating in the discussions:

California Farm Bureau
California Restaurant Association


GN -

I don't know Cuzin' Eric's new e-mail, so you'll have to pass this on to him
. . .
this weekend Buckcherry is one of the bands playing for a local radio
station's Memorial Day bash.  I guess you guys came to Des Moines on the
wrong weekend . . .

Matthew R Gillaspie
Public Finance Associate
U S Bancorp Piper Jaffray
700 Walnut Street, Ste 1300
Des Moines, Iowa  50309
(515) 247-2353
(800) 333-6008
mgillaspie02@pjc.com

______________________________________________________________________

http://www.piperjaffray.com

Investment products purchased from or through U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray:

    ---------------------------------------------------------
    * Not FDIC-insured * No bank guarantee * May lose value *
    ---------------------------------------------------------

http://www.piperjaffray.com/disclosure.asp - See For Additional Disclosure
Information
______________________________________________________________________


Review and call for more iterations.

Garrett
39335


I will bring John BRindle.
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


---------------------- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 04/13/2000
06:04 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Steve Van Hooser                           04/13/2000 05:56 PM

To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Clair
cc:
Subject: Thanks!

FYI

Steve
---------------------- Forwarded by Steve Van Hooser/HOU/ECT on 04/13/2000
05:54 PM ---------------------------

Melinda Winn@EES
04/13/2000 04:32 PM
To: Steve Van Hooser/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Thanks!

Steve, thanks for the update.  Most current resume is attached.  I appreciate
your help!

Melinda


Jeff Skilling, President and CEO, will be in Portland this Wednesday, March
14, he is scheduled to tour and address the ENA Trading Floor at 4:00 PM.
Please contact Tim or myself should you have any questions.

Regards,

Chris


Anna Cola is through a recruiter and would be at a 20% fee.

?For the last eight years Anna has  worked consistently as a Project Gas
Accountant.
She has worked in  downstream gas marketing with companies such as Shell,
Coastal, Texaco,  Tenneco, Natural Gas Clearing House and Midcon Texas
Pipeline.
Anna has also  worked on upstream accounting with EEX and Ashland
Exploration.
She has gained  experience in areas of AP, AR, revenue accounting, joint
interest billing, and  gas balancing.
Prior to working on  a project basis Anna was a JIB accountant with Buttes
Resources.
Anna is available  to start immediately on a project or perm basis.

 - Cola_Anna.doc


Kate:

Hi!

Joe Hunter will be taking my place for now until a replacement is found. His
phone number
is 713-853-3316. We will be faxing your matchups to you once we receive them
from EDF Man.

Thanks
David
---------------------- Forwarded by David P Dupre/HOU/ECT on 11/27/2000 10:40
PM ---------------------------
   Kate Symes                11/27/2000 05:42 PM

To: David P Dupre/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Enron Portland - Dec. Futures

Dave -
I'm the new Deal Control staff person here in the Portland office, and I've
been told you're the person to contact regarding counterparty match-ups for
our futures deals this month.

The futures were done today, and if you could let me know of the
corresponding counterparties as soon as you find out, that would be very
helpful. If there is anything I should know about your job or how we might
help each other work better, please let me know.

Thanks a lot,
Kate
503.464.7486


Yeah, but you know I can't resist an opportunity to make a sarcastic remark.

Gabriel Monroy
11/03/2000 02:14 PM
To: Robin Rodrigue/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: EBS

See now I think you should stay with risk. Yeahh.I think you are better off
there. he he he. You know this means that if you go to EBS our stock can
actually go down. No, what it really means is that I might have to help the
new person if you are really busy. Personally I do not like the idea.

Ok, I'll ask Ibrahim about this friend of his.

As for golf practice, we'll see if the weather turns out to be ok. I'll send
you an email once I know this guy's name, ok?

I was asking what you thought about  the whole EBS thing, not about my
nervousness.

Gabriel


Oneal Aaron Brooks 7
E Bass Redskins D 0
J Bass Bledsoe 2
Harry B Zack Crocket 60, Brad Hoover 35, Chris Heahterington
Gary L Magnum 2, Pritchet 1, Parmalee 3
Hull Jerald Moore 7, Christian Fauria 1, Willie Jackson 2, Jerome Pathon 1,
Didric Ward 2, Joe Jaravicious 1, Rod Rutledge 1


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 02/02/2001 08:14 PM -----

	Scott Govenar <sgovenar@govadv.com>
	02/02/2001 01:46 PM

		 To: Mike Day <MDay@GMSSR.com>, Sandra McCubbin <Sandra.McCubbin@enron.com>,
Jeff Dasovich <jdasovic@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Rate Freeze

Edison has agreed to support Enron's legislative language regarding the
rate freeze.  I forwarded this information to Joe Lyons in Rod Wright's
office.


Andy and Richard,

	By hand-delivery I will shortly send to you a copy of the underlying contract on which RSM bases its right to file this suit.  Having read it, I think I recall having seen it years ago when it was distributed in the Grynberg suit by Mike Noone of the Beatty Law Firm.  Long and short, Jack Grynberg signed this contract as chairman and CEO of RSM with the County of Zapata (the only other party; the Zapata Independent School District is not named in the contract, although it is named in the lawsuit) in 1997.

	It is basically a retainer agreement that purports to give RSM the right to collect unpaid ad valorem taxes on behalf of the County of Zapata, Texas (again, not mentioning that it would be on behalf of the Zapata Independent School District).  Grynberg agrees to front the litigation costs and gets 40% of any taxes and fees recovered.  I see little difference between this agreement and what a plaintiff's law firm would have required.

	This strikes me as a blatant attempt to create by contract what does not exist by statute:  a Texas qui tam action (you may recall that a Texas qui tam bill even broader than the federal act was pending in the Legislature last year, but was not passed).  I also wonder whether this amounts to the unauthorized practice of law, barratry, etc.

	Given that the contract was signed in 1997 and that recovery in the Zapata County suit would probably be very small compared to the nation-wide qui tam action even in a worst-case situation for the defendants, the view is that Grynberg may have filed this primarily because both his nationwide qui tam action and the Quinque action stalled and Grynberg needs merits discovery as quickly as possible to bolster his original source position.

	I will keep you advised.

	Britt


Forwarded at the request of Joe Hillings:

Joe Hillings: -- The notes look great.  I have made a couple of technical
corrections to the document, which I am attaching as a separate file.

To all -- everyone here at Hills & company hopes you have a wonderful
holiday!

Bob Fisher (Hills & Company)

___________________________________________________________________________
Dear Friends: Please review, correct, make additions and return. Joe

The Energy Services Coalition (please note that we are no longer using
US
WTO ESC) met at the request of Carol Balassa of USTR to get her
perspective
on energy services negotiations of the WTO and what our coalition needs
to
accomplish as well as a time perspective.

Present from the USG were Carol Balassa (USTR), Josephine Ludolph and
Richard Boll (DOC), Russ Profozich (DOE), Patricia Norman (DOS) and a
regular from the ITC.

Joe Hillings, Christina Bolton, Bob Fisher, Steve Burns, Brian Petty and
Chris Long represented the ESC.

Carol conducted an extensive and excellent briefing listing several
phases
of activity. She started the session by telling those present that the
lack
of action at Seattle was not a negative on what we need to accomplish
this
coming year. We are on track and need to produce various position papers
as
early as the end of January.

Articles 19 of the GATT requires that the WTO make progress on
agriculture
and services issues although it does not identify a date certain to
achieve
agreement..

Ambassador Barshefsky is committed to beginning services negotiations
beginning in January.

A Committee on Specific Committments is charged with the responsibility
to
draft issues. The USTR wants to have a definition of issues from the ESC
by
the end of January to be submitted to the USG representatives on the
Committee.

A second significant group in the process is the Working Group On
Domestic
Rights.This group is chaired by Peter Collins. Peter needs to know what
are
the domestic regulatory issues that could be raised by other WTO members
as
reasons not to liberalize various sectors. This information is to be
supplied in the first half of 2000.

In late spring after group one and two have done a significant part of
their work the USTR will be deciding what additional principles are
needed
to be tabled in the negotiation. They expect these working groups will
begin to meet at the WTO by the end of next summer.

Three basic columns headed by (1) Market Access, (2) National Treatment,
(3) Additional Committments (Could be proposed annex such as the process
Tim Richards has proposed in our Electricity Working Group listing
examples) is the format to be developed for the two groups.

Carol advised us that whatever we develop should be with the intention
of
getting Less Developed Countries (LDCs) supporting our basic principles
in
case a multilateral negotiation is not launched. We should work the
current
liberalization process being prosecuted in the APEC and FTAA
negotiations..

The next phase of Carol's presentation addressed the recent response
USTR
received to the questions they submitted to DG 17 (it no longer exisits
under the new commission) asking the EU to address their feelings about
the
liberalization of energy services.

We have not been given a copy of the EU response and Carol has asked Ms.
Klinkers of the EU if the response can be shared with the ESC to secure
industry responce. Carol and others from the USG attending the meeting
are
trying to ascertain just who drafted the responses which they
characterized
as "confusing and not indicating a real understanding of the current
practices and developments in the energy services sector."  We do know
that
the USG has called this office to ask how they need to respond to the EU
response that electricity is a good and not a service. Our immediate
response is that this is a matter of some disagreement among EU members
and
the EU staff. The movement of electricity across national boundries may
be
a good but the sale and trading of electricity is definately a service.

The EU response we were told makes the agrument that in their view that
many of the items raised in the October paper of the USTR were GAT
covered
such as construction, engineering, etc and therefore, may not need to be
raised in the services negotiations although these items will at least
need
some sort of annex to make sure they are included.. The EU believes that
if
you own or operate electricity producting  then its a good but if you
operate an IPP to sell electricity to various parties, its a service.

We were told that the EU response does not seem to understand or cover
renewables such as wind and solar both of which are important in
Europe's
plan to diversify and develop green energy.  They also believe that
price/risk management should be considered under finance services not
energy services.

The session was then open to general discussion. Bob Fisher commented
that
the EU does not seem to understand the scope of today's energy services
industry. That we now have a seemless web of energy services that has
been
developed. What about environmental services? Again, the EU response is
confusted and incomplete. Apparently they feel that environmental
services
can be considered elsewhere in the negotiation.

Who from the EU drafted this paper? The staff has changed and we don't
know
how "high" in their heirarchy this was considered. Carol Balassa
responded
that she is trying to determine who drafted the response..  Brian Petty
advised that his intelligence is that energy services is being discussed
and considered at the highest levels of the Commission.

Carol told us that she is trying to get everything together before
"talking" to the EU in January when she hopes to specifically respond
and
discuss their current returned response. Therefore, she is asking the
Energy Services Coalition to complete the work of our four Working
Groups
which will allow the Hills people to develop the definition and basic
negotiating position papers.

The DOS representative then suggested that we engage in some"capacity
building." This was defined as an outreach program to brief WTO member
delegations on the meaning of energy services. Carol suggested that
after
her January meeting the EU could be agreeable to having our industry
group
meet with their representatives to explain how energy services has
evolved
and what is included in energy services.

We moved to a discussion of the definitions paper itself. Bob Fisher
reminded those present that the current matrix developed for the APEC
process was still an excellent guide to definitions although items such
as
renewables, heating and certain trading and financial services would
need
to be added. To meet some EU concerns that they are not a party to APEC
and
therefore suspicious of any such document, we should remove the
reference
to APEC.

Our group pointed to the Tim Richards paper developed for our
Electricity
Working Group which gives a broad definition but then contains a
footnote
known as the illustrative list which lists the various items that we
believe constitute energy services under that heading. Bob Fisher said
that
this was the likely format we would ultimately adopt in the material
prepared for USTR and others in the WTO process.  Bob said that once
negotiators agree on the need for liberalized energy services they can
"fit" whatever they want under the broad definition.

The last question raised was what happens to the ATL (accelerated tariff
liberalization) which also covers some energy matters which WTO
countries
had contemplated being approved in Seattle. Carol said that she did not
know.

The meeting then adjourned.

The ESC needs to complete the Working Group process and complete the
questionaire at the earliest possible time to allow the Hills people to
prepare the basic document. Working Group chairs are to be asked to
complete this process by mid January.

Dear Reviewers: Please review at your earliest opportunity, make
corrections, additions and whatever and return to me for distribution.
Distribution will be to our ESC Executive Committee first and then to
our
entire membership of 45 (not to those who have not signed on as members)
and to USG participants.

 - ESC~Balassa~briefing~memcon~12-99.doc


please calendar.  thanks.  mhc

---------------------- Forwarded by Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT on 12/07/2000 10:05
AM ---------------------------

Sarah Reyna@ENRON on 12/07/2000 08:44:33 AM
To: Amanda Colpean/Corp/Enron@Enron, Daniel Ferrell/NA/Enron@Enron,
Christopher Chenoweth/NA/Enron@Enron, Robert E Anderson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peter
del Vecchio/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen L Barbour/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Marshall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Blumenthal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ken Curry/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Kathy Neal/NA/Enron@ENRON, Susan Worthen/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rick Johnson/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Finley Biggerstaff/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Project CanaryTeam Mtg.

Please mark your calendar for the following meeting.

   When:    Friday, December 8th

   Where:   EB27C2

   Time:      10:00am -11:00am

Thank you,

Sarah Reyna

   When:    Wednesday, December 6th

   Where:   EB27C2

   Time:      10:00am -11:00am

Thank you,

Sarah Reyna


I Yolanda Herrera give my son  Rudy Acevedo the Property on 1216 and 1218
Tulane. The reason for me giving my son the property is that i will be that i
can no longer afford to pay the mortgage.  The property has a duplex which is
1216 and 1218 tulane. This is a pure gift and no money will exchage hands.
The effective date is jan 25, 2001.


Are any of you still around?  I need to talk to one of you about this request.

Thanks

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Trevino, Susan
Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 3:58 PM
To:	Wilson, Shona; Abel, Chris; Ayala, Susie
Subject:	FW: new book req

FYI

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Love, Phillip M.
Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 1:24 PM
To:	Keiser, Kam; Trevino, Susan
Cc:	Winfree, O'Neal D.; Giron, Darron C.; McLaughlin Jr., Errol; Palmer, B. Scott
Subject:	RE: new book req

Susan,
attached is a new matrix for each desk.  This should replace the previous matrix you are using.  We are just putting our groups down in the access request list and this should be used to cross reference.  Please let me know if you have any questions.  Thanks.
PL
 << File: desk matrix.xls >>

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Keiser, Kam
Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 1:01 PM
To:	Trevino, Susan
Cc:	Love, Phillip M.; Winfree, O'Neal D.; Giron, Darron C.; McLaughlin Jr., Errol; Palmer, B. Scott
Subject:	new book req

Susan,

These are book requests for the Netco books for all regions.

Please let me know if you have any questions.  We put in some book and portfolio codes we would like if they are available.  If not, please call me.  We need all price, basis, index, and gas daily US books to be the same, all Canadian books to be the same and all physical books to have the same codes please.

Thanks

Kam

 << File: Book Request Form  Financial.xls >>  << File: Book Request Form Central.xls >>  << File: Book Request Form East.xls >>  << File: Book Request Form Texas.xls >>  << File: Book Request Form West.xls >>


I will be attending the meeting below.  If you would like to attend or can
add value, please feel free to attend.
kh
To: Jeanne Licciardo/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Darrell Schoolcraft/ET&S/Enron@ENRON,
Cynthia Rivers/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Linda Ward/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Perry
Frazier/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, James Moore/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Sheila
Nacey/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, John Buchanan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, David
Duff/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rick Dietz/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Hasan Kedwaii/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: TW Capacity Meeting

I would like to schedule a meeting for Tuesday, Oct. 17th at 9:00 in room
4194 to discuss the current processes of TW's TCI capacity system and address
any issues we may have with the functionality of the new capacity analysis
system implemetation. It is my understanding that the new CAS system will
replace TCI and the groups and points  that market services uses for
allocations.

Please let me know if you are unable to attend.

Thanks Ramona


Chris,  I think we already discussed this issue but let me summarize what I think happened:

we were parking 50 mw's with COB.   We sold 50 to Reliant/HLP,  but the transmission got cut.    3 mw's flowed on Oasis 9337 to Reliant.    We show in the system that we are purchasing 50 mw's from COB and selling them 47.
So,  I dont think that we needed to bookout 3 mw's with HLP.    They received 3 mw's from City of Bryan on deal #625291.
You entered a bookout purchase on deal #625352.

Oasis also  shows that 3 mw's flowed on #9337.   So once again,  we have an extra purchase from HLP that we didnt need.
Did you negotiate this with HLP?
Is this what happened?

I'll talk to you about this tonight.

Thanks,  MW

JMF


I do play guitar, but I am really still just learning.  I can play bit and
pieces of various songs.  Might be fun to attempt to jam together anyway.
Are your drums here in Houston?

	Kevin Jurica <KJurica@syntexsolutions.com>
	01/17/2001 07:46 AM

		 To: "'Gerald.Nemec@enron.com'" <Gerald.Nemec@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: Hello!

It's going great!
I told my folks as well and they were pretty surprised.  Houston has been
good to us so far.  Although I have been working my butt off, so I haven't
seen much of it.  I heard you play the guitar.  We could have a little
partridge family band because I play the drums.  Anyway I have been itching
to play for about 3 years (I have been in apartments for that long), so we
should get together and jam if you are interested.
I'll talk to you later,
-Kevin

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Gerald.Nemec@enron.com [mailto:Gerald.Nemec@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2001 5:26 PM
To: kjurica@syntexsolutions.com
Subject: Hello!

Hey Kevin,  How is it going cousin?  Found the napkin that you left your
email address on at Kenneally's.  Man, I really was loaded by the time I
left that place.  I went down to CC the next day and told my parents we had
met.  They said they had just been at your wedding not to long before
Christmas.  Small world!

How's Houston treating you?  Been back to Kenneally's since?  Drop me a
line when you get a chance.

Gerald,


Thanks Mike!  I'll miss it but I suspect I'll get back a lot to bother you
guys!  df

From: Mike W McGowan/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/08/2001 07:48 AM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: FW: Organization Announcement

Drew -  C O N G R A T U L A T I O N S !!!!!!!   You will do a great
job!!!!!   We will miss you here in Omaha!!!

Mike

 -----Original Message-----
From:  ETS General Announcement/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-ETS+20General+20Announcement_ET+26S_Enron+40ENRON@ENRON.com
]  On Behalf Of Stan Horton, Chairman & CEO@ENRON
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 10:58 PM
To: Enron Transportation Services Operations@ENRON
Subject: Organization Announcement

Michael Moran, currently Managing Director and General Counsel for ETS, has
decided to retire after a distinguished 27-year career with Enron.   Mike has
been a conscience and a statesman of our organization and it is hard for me
to imagine the ETS organization without Mike.

Fortunately, Drew Fossum, currently Vice President and General Counsel for
Northern Natural Gas and Transwestern, has accepted my offer to become Vice
President and General Counsel of ETS effective April 1, 2001.  Drew will
relocate to Houston and report to me in his new role.

To assist with transition issues and special projects, Mike has agreed to
stay on board for several months as Managing Director and Special Counsel to
the Chairman and will continue to report to me.

Please join me in congratulating Drew on his new assignment and thanking Mike
for his many contributions to ETS and Enron.


I could have told you that...it's just like anywhere else...the dumber they
are...the better looking they are...Texas lets in like 200,000 people a
year...and most of them are dumb ass chicks...did you notice all of those
schools are PUBLIC!  Don't worry Hoskins...we know where the real women are!


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	Lynn - Oncall

Date:		9/22/2001
Time:		7:00 AM - 8:00 AM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


Start Date: 4/3/01; HourAhead hour: 14;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Generation schedule.
Variances detected in SC Trades schedule.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001040314.txt

---- Generation Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE.
     Details: (Hour: 14 / Preferred:  20.00 / Final:  28.32)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: TOSCO
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/3/01
  UNIT_ID: UNCHEM_1_UNIT

---- SC Trades Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblInt_Interchange.
     Details: (Hour: 14 / Preferred: -250.00 / Final: -225.00)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/3/01
  TRADING_SC: EPPS
  PNT_OF_INTRC: SP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 1
  DEAL_NO: 1
$$$ Variance found in table tblInt_Interchange.
     Details: (Hour: 14 / Preferred: -462.00 / Final: -450.00)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/3/01
  TRADING_SC: NES1
  PNT_OF_INTRC: SP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 1
  DEAL_NO: 1

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 14 / Preferred:   0.51 / Final:   0.34)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE1
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/3/01
  SC_ID: EPMI
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 14 / Preferred:   5.58 / Final:   2.79)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE2
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/3/01
  SC_ID: EPMI
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 14 / Preferred:  50.90 / Final:  25.18)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE3
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/3/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


Please check availability for the following meeting:

Tariff/Deregs
Tues., May 8th
rm 3308
4pm - 5pm

The following will need to attend...Jay Lewis, Jim Steffes, John Lavorato, Don Black, Rogers Herndon.

Thanks,

Tjae
x35800


Okay.


Greetings Everyone --

You may have noticed that your paycheck stubs reflect vacation and sick leave
balances that are inaccurate.  Due to EWC being acquired mid calendar year,
and GE "grandfathering" in our vacation levels, the balances as stated on
your check stub will differ from your actual balances.  So, for the balance
of this calendar year (2002), all vacation and sick time balances will be
tracked locally on our own HRIS System (at GE Wind in Tehachapi).

Human Resources will provide you with your true balances by the following
method:

The first of every month Human Resources will print out a hard copy of your
vacation and sick leave balances.
Employees located in the North and South Tehachapi facilities will be able to
pick up a hard copy of their balances from their respective facility
receptionists.
Remote site employees' balances will be mailed to the respective Site
Supervisors for distribution.

Thank you for your continued understanding through the integration process.


Hey Jen,  The number is at the house.  I will send it to you tomorrow.  The GK was fun.  We went to another similar type place called the Marquis II.  They were both pretty cool.  Kinda of dives.  I was pretty polluted by the end of the night.  No game this weekend.  We'll have to grab beers again.  Later.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	jennifer-gillaspie@reliantenergy.com@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, October 30, 2001 11:05 AM
To:	Nemec, Gerald
Subject:	Help! My house is a mess.

Gerald, could you give me the name and phone number of the woman who cleans
your house? We're going to hire her if she's available. Sorry we didn't
show up at the GK. Eric was lame and wanted to go home. Was it fun? Do you
have a football game to go to this weekend? Talk to you soon.

jenn


Well that's ok if we don't - I have no idea what Stockman's view is and heis back tomorrow.  Its easier to control money if we have the conversations.

Currently at the drug test - there is a long list of people from ene who have been here today.
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld


Brent (and Neve and Bill),

I want to be perfectly clear in understanding this trade, and where/who is
managing the risks.

Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From:  White, Bill
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 6:53 PM
To: Murphy, Ted
Cc: Shankman, Jeffrey A.
Subject: FW: New GFU oil volumes

Ted, looks like the deal may/will be hedged on Thursday.  They indicate that
part of the oil may be offset with an existing accrual position (can't
remember whether this magic was with train 1 or 2).  Two questions:  1) is
this being signed off on by accounting, and 2) I would like to make sure that
the offset position is being "put to bed", ie that we are not going to find
ourselves trading a long-term piece of crude against the UK gas group at some
point in the future.

Thanks for the help in advance.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Ferguson, Matthew
Sent: 06 June 2001 13:22
To: White, Bill; Clarke, Niamh
Cc: O'Brien, Tony; Peter, Stewart; Murray, Anita; Foster, Maria
Subject: FW: New oil volumes

Bill

Well, we are almost there, Statoil finally agreed our price today.  Also, it
looks like the oil volumes that we need to hedge will not be as large as
anticipated due to an existing long accrual position at the Teesside gas
plant.  We will get the final amount that Transaction Support will let us
apply to the Teesside position tomorrow morning and probably hedge the rest
of it.  The anticipation is that we will need to purchase between 30% and 50%
from you all.

Attached are the volumes for both scenarios (30% and 50%).  If you can send
over mid and offer prices for the two volumes, we will get a final number
from TS and let you know how much we need to hedge in the morning.

Thanks
Matt

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Murray, Anita
Sent: 06 June 2001 19:07
To: Ferguson, Matthew
Subject: New oil volumes

Matt,

Please find attached a spreadsheet approximating the oil volumes based on the
current forward USD/GBP FX rate & either a 33% or 50% hedge based on either
of the two Train 1 scenarios.

Regards

Anita


Thanks.

Look at the attached ... it may be too late for this afternoon, but I took a
shot at a revised way of presenting the investment fund and the associated
issues (substitute for slides 15-17?)


UBS CONTACTS

IN HOUSTON WEEKEND OF JANUARY 19/20
	Position	Home	Work	Cell	Other
Anderson, Mimi	Data Administration	203-353-9121	203-719-6448
Brown, Anthony	All Issues	212-253-6313	212-821-2346	646-244-6311
Galasso, Jill	Data Administration	203-277-2067	203-719-3614
Lee, Jenai	Data Manager	718-788-8468	212-821-6073

KEY CONTACTS WEEKEND OF JANUARY 19/20
	Position	Home	Work	Cell	Other
Bliss, Melissa	Front Office	203-655-4678	203-719-6358	203-253-4339
Eastwick, Jacqueline	Front Office	203-966-9294	203-719-4575
Martin, Audrey	Front Office	212-423-5764	203-719-4699	917-468-0237	860-824-7707
Luecke, Susan	Operations	203-602-3332	203-719-6916	914-830-4528
Ciliberto, David	IT	212-253-5477	212-713-3276	917-319-5360
Reichman, Peter	FCD/Legal	914-939-4161	203-719-0276	917-417-8914
Knight, Linda	CRM/HR/Market Risk	203-438-5397	203-719-4681	917-848-7251

KEY SPECIALIST CONTACTS WEEKEND OF JANUARY 19/20
	Position	Home	Work	Cell	Other
Raman, Kumar	Immigration		212-891-7515
Digiacomo, Larry	Reloction/Int'l Assignees	203-248-4560	203-719-4686	203-696-8646
Hart, Tracy	Compensation Policies	203-358-9687	203-719-4688
Raimondi, Vince	Benefits	203-563-0535	203-719-0656	203-563-0535

HOUSTONIAN HOTEL	713-680-2626
War Room - Magnolia Room

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kitchen, Louise
Sent:	Friday, January 18, 2002 5:38 PM
To:	Presto, Kevin M.; Whalley, Greg; Shively, Hunter S.; Lavorato, John; Belden, Tim; Calger, Christopher F.; Milnthorp, Rob; Oxley, David
Cc:	Schoppe, Tammie
Subject:	 Meeting this week-end

We plan to have a conference call at 2pm Sunday to discuss progress.  We want to reallocate dollars which have been returned to the pool and ensure we keep the process moving and any contracts redone by the UBS team in preparation for Monday.  David is going to send an email with contact numbers etc for questions people may have with regard to the contracts (apart from the numbers and promotions) as all those questions need to be sent to HR.

Please make sure you contact all of your guys and have an idea of where they are at.

Tammie will contact you all with the dial in number.

The meeting will be in John's office.

Thanks

Louise


should be non bondad

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ellis, Laurie
Sent:	Tuesday, June 19, 2001 10:18 AM
To:	Tholt, Jane M.
Subject:	Deal 763736

Jane, on deal 763736 for May 01 sales to Southwest Gas, we have a pricing discrepancy.  Our system reflects SJ Bondad GDP but SWG is going to pay us based on SJ Non-Bondad GDP.  Can you please confirm which price is correct and make the change in Sitara if necessary?

Thanks

Laurie Ellis
Enron Net Works LLC
Client Services
Phone: (713) 345-9945
Fax:  (713) 646-8420
Email:  laurie.ellis@enron.com

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Nancy Frazier" <Nancy.Frazier@groupwise.swgas.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, June 19, 2001 9:46 AM
To:	Ellis, Laurie
Subject:	May

Sorry about the flooding.  Hope you and your family survived ok.  Attached are the gas settlement and support for May.  The only difference we had was for package V02.  Mark Anderson says that even though Bondad gas flowed, the price was Non-Bondad.

Have a great day.  Nancy

 - ENRON.XLS << File: ENRON.XLS >>
 - enrongss.xls << File: enrongss.xls >>


The report named: CE P/L <http://trv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=4&report_name=CE+P/L&category_cd=3&category_name=CENTRAL&toc_hide=1&sTV1=3&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=10/11/2001>, published as of 10/11/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


Ditto

	  From:  Christi L Nicolay                           04/11/2001 09:08 AM

To:	Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:	FERC order denying SPP/Entergy RTO -Summary

---------------------- Forwarded by Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT on 04/11/2001 09:08 AM ---------------------------

	  From:  Christi L Nicolay                           03/29/2001 07:28 PM

To:	Berney C Aucoin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brad Morse/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edith Cross/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject:	FERC order denying SPP/Entergy RTO -Summary

FERC Order Issued 3/28/01 Rejecting SPP/Entergy's RTO

	The Commissioners were generally displeased by SPP and Entergy's lack of substantive work toward complying with the Commission's previous orders and failure to sufficiently discuss the feasibility of a broader RTO.  As Chair Herbert said:  SPP should have read the Commission's order in May and taken it more seriously.  (Issues for possible rehearing are ****).

?	The Commission declined to approve SPP's scope and configuration because the SPP members remain uncommitted to the RTO and have not made a decision to transfer operational control and the SPP/Entergy relationship remains somewhat undefined.  The Commission wants to see evidence of serious efforts to form RTOs that combine current RTO proposals and Entergy and SPP must file a report by May 25 addressing this scope issue.

	o	Bulk power sales and purchase figures indicate that natural markets extend beyond the SPP RTO borders.  There are significant sales and purchases between SPP and SERC (and Midwest companies to a lesser extent.)
	o	Expect the existing TOs to file Section 203 applications to transfer control of transmission to SPP.
	o	MOU must be clarified to demonstrate that the minimum requirements of an RTO, such as operational authority, ATC calculation and planning/expansion, will be met.

?	Approves Entergy's proposal for a Managing Member that controls all voting rights to the Transco and approves Entergy's Board approval process (states that Entergy would control no more than two of the selection committee's seven members).

?	Allows Southwestern Public Service Company to satisfy its merger obligation by joining SPP instead of MISO.

?	The Commission did not address EPMI's motion to condition market based rate authority on RTO participation.******


Effective Monday, November 19, Mark Haedicke will office in the new building.  His location will be:  ECS 06788 (sixth floor, office number 788).

My new location will be ECS 06785 (just outside Mark's office).

Our telephone numbers and fax number will remain the same.

Janette Elbertson
Enron Wholesale Services
Legal Department
Telephone:  (713) 853-7906
Fax:  (713) 646-2600
e-mail:  janette.elbertson@enron.com


Thanks.  Once done, let's have a phone call with the wholesale electricity team to discuss before sending to Ashley.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maurer, Luiz
Sent:	Thursday, November 15, 2001 8:06 AM
To:	Steffes, James D.
Subject:	National Grid

Jim
I am working on the questions for Ashley Brown. I should have a draft tomorrow, to be checked by Paul.

In the meantime:

1) I am examining the currrent NGC system operator price control and incentive schemes under NETA. It is a radical change from the previous regulation. I would say it is a sophisticated piece of PBR. It includes penalties and incentives on internal and external costs (e.g. balancing) This document clearly states that the system would move away from central, merit order dispatch and would become much more self-dispatched. As a ramification, T rights would be defined on a pnysical basis. (far from our LMP, physical rights model). Your suspicion about NG proposal was right on targed

2) As part of the definition of Profit-RTO (which I think lends itself to multiple interpretations), I prepared this simple graph. In one of the questions we shoud ask Ashley where do they see themselves in the end-state. My feeling is that the Southeast Mediation Report advocated for stage II, NGC is stage III and the "textbook" RTO is stage IV.

 << File: LM-Chart-1001.ppt >>


May 7 and 8 (PHI @7:05) and 21 and 22 (SD @7:05) Astros tickets are still
available!!!  Let Ina or me know if you are interested.

Thanks,
:-) Jessica


Can you print out a copy of the legal risk memo E. Sager did?


1.	Legislative Update - Sandi McCubbin
2.	Update from SCE Court Case - No Immediate Action / Bankruptcy Implications - Mike Smith
3.	EES Petition to Update PX Credit Calculation (to be filed tomorrow)
4.	CERA Study - Update from Margaret Carson
5.	EES Shaped Energy Needs - Next Steps
6.	Enron Legislation Team Report & Issues - Leslie Lawner
7.	Enron Bankruptcy Response - Any Action Items?
8.	Other


Mark:

As I mentioned in my voice mail to you last Saturday, in addition to the
choice of Mexican law, there is another outstanding issue that may result in
increased risk to Enron Corp.  I did not go into detail on this issue this
morning when we spoke because discussions are still ongoing relative to the
issue and I sensed that you had a very limited amount of time available.  The
issue has not yet been resolved and I want to assure that you are aware of
the issue before I leave the office for the holiday.

Enron Corp. will provide a letter of credit to Pemex as required under the
Fuel Supply Agreement.  The letter of credit will be in an amount equal to
150% of two months of estimated gas purchases under the Fuel Supply
Agreement.  The lenders have required that Enron Corp. evidence in writing
its commitment to provide such letter of credit and, therefore, a FSA Credit
Support Agreement (the "FSA Support") is currently under negotiation.

The following issue arises under the repayment mechanism currently set forth
in FSA Support and, therefore, it is possible that it may become moot when
the negotiations relative to the FSA Support are concluded.

The repayment mechanism for the fuel supply letter of credit states that
Enron Energia Industrial de Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V. ("EEIM") will
reimburse Enron Corp. for any disbursements made under the letter of credit.
This mechanism may subject Enron Corp. to the risk that, after repayment by
EEIM to Enron Corp. of an outstanding debt resulting from EEIM's
reimbursement obligation and the resulting reinstatement of the letter of
credit, the repayment by EEIM could be withdrawn as a preferential payment if
EEIM went into bankruptcy.  In such event, Enron Corp. would be in the
situation of having an outstanding letter of credit and an unpaid
reimbursement obligation.

To reiterate, the FSA Support is still under negotiation but such
negotiations must be concluded before the lenders will close.  I will request
that Robert Stephens, the Bracewell Patterson attorney working on the FSA
Support, keep you updated on the status of this issue in my absence.  Robert
will be in Washington, D.C., through Wednesday.

Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.


Kelly M. Johnson
Executive Assistant
Enron Corp.
Tel: 713-853-6485
Fax: 713-853-2534
E-Mail: kelly.johnson@enron.com


Thanks for your input. On the issues you raised following are my comments

1. The only change is the new tax clause which is paragraph 2.5
2. I will leave it to out tax experts to confirm the arrangements but I
believe the tax treatries are limited to the countries I listed. As far as
procedures are concerned I would be looking for signoff from tax. Either
Susan Musch or PW.
3. refer 1 above
4.Yes I can make this determination.
5. Clause 2  of the ETA will be of great assistance but we cannot avoid our
responsibility entirely, particularly where there are reasonable grounds to
assume a party is not trading as a principal

As I am in Houston can we get together to discuss. Please call me on my cell
phone 12817823270

David Forster@ECT
03/31/2000 10:26 PM
To: David Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Heidi Mason/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Paul
Smith/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Paul
Quilkey/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Musch/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Re: EnronOnline procedures and GTCs

David,

Thanks for the info.

Could you address the following questions?

1) Do you have a redlined version of the GTC, highlighting changes from what
is online?
2) You mention: "Counterparties from other countries will require specific
tax clearance" - could you explain what this process will be?
3) Could you please confirm that Australia does not have a Double Taxation
Agreement with:

 Argentina
 Brazil
 Canada
 Croatia
 Germany
 Japan
 Netherlands
 Poland
 Portugal
 Romania
 Singapore
 Slovenia
(note these are all countries which have PA's under EnronOnline or are
expected to have PA's very soon)

4) 1.5: Reasonableness Test: "a determination needs to be made whether
inviting them to trade Australian Power could lead to a claim of
misleading/deceptive conduct under the Trade Practices Act 1974."  Can you
make this determination or indicate how we can make this determination?

5) 1.2 Regulatory Obligations: "Confirm that counterparty will trade as
principal." In your opinion,does Clause 2(a) of the ETA sufficiently address
this concern?

Thanks for your help,

Dave

David Minns@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
03/31/2000 08:58 AM
To: Heidi Mason/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Paul Smith/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Paul
Quilkey/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, David Forster/LON/ECT@ECT, Tana
Jones@ECT, Mark Taylor@ECT, Susan Musch/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: EnronOnline procedures and GTCs

Attached are the GTCs that I have revised to address tax issues that would
arise from counterparties with no Australia presence. I am content settlement
provisions already covered in the documentation. I have also developed a
checklist for new counterparties. Would you pass onto Chris Catt at PW for
his signoff.


We finally connected.

Beau Normark (sp?), ABB President is coming for a visit to the local ABB office and wants to meet with Enron as part of a general meet n' greet (as suspected).

They don't have any particular agenda in mind, but will probably want to talk a bit about the business relationship Enron and ABB have enjoyed in the past, our current projects (e.g. TexMex) and any plans we might care to share about the future.

Dave


There will be a staff meeting tomorrow morning @ 9AM in Team Room 6716.  Please accept this invite, as it will automatically populate onto your schedules.

Thank you,

Irena


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	MEET W/ SCOTT EB2132

Date:		9/6/2000
Time:		1:00 PM - 2:00 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


The report named: NG - PROPT P/L <http://trv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=11&report_name=NG+-+PROPT+P/L&category_cd=5&category_name=FINANCIAL&toc_hide=1&sTV1=5&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=10/04/2001>, published as of 10/04/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


Harry,
The future prices used below are from NYMEX - quoted for California Oregon
Border (COB)
I am attaching the web pages that are relevant

We obtained the NP15 numbers from a daily compilation of Dow Jones NP15
quotes.  Since we don't have that on a recognizable piece of paper, I am
attaching the most recent ISO Market Activity Report for February.  That
contains a February price of $341/MWh (see page 3).

To get from $290 to (about) $300/MWh add the following
1) Ancillary services -- use about 4-5% of energy costs (see page 5 of ISO
report)
2) Losses to get from Supplier to Customer -- even 5% losses (which is
conservative) adds another $10/MWh

/TJ

---------------------- Forwarded by Tamara Johnson/HOU/EES on 04/17/2001
09:29 AM ---------------------------

Tamara Johnson
04/13/2001 05:22 PM
To: Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: backup for the $290/MWh

NP15:  Recorded hourly Dow Jones numbers averaged using the same time periods
as NYMEX.
MW:  Reported as of April 12 NYMEX.

Peak Periods = (365 days less 10 holidays) x 6/7 weekdays x 16 hours => 56%
On-peak

The current rates for PG&E and SCE are as per the Mar 27 CPUC decision.  The
GWh are from the utilities 2001 (12mos) rate design templates.


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT on 06/27/2000
12:32 PM ---------------------------

Zimin Lu
06/14/2000 07:09 AM
To: Mark Breese/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Colleen
Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip K
Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas A Martin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim Schwieger/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: gas storage model

Mark,

We are currently back-testing the storage model.
The enclosed version contains deltas and decision
variable.

You mentioned that you have resources to run the model. Please do so.
This will help us to gain experience with the market vs the
model.

I am going to distribute an article by Caminus, an software vendor.
The article illustrates the optionality associated with storage operation
very well.  The Enron Research storage model  is a lot like that, although
implementation may be
different.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Zimin


Start Date: 2/1/02; HourAhead hour: 16;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002020116.txt


---------------------- Forwarded by Kayne Coulter/HOU/ECT on 01/09/2001 04:48
PM ---------------------------

mbjohns@duke-energy.com on 01/09/2001 03:59:14 PM
To: kayne.coulter@enron.com, dbjohnso@duke-energy.com,
mbnewman@duke-energy.com, obtadloc@duke-energy.com, alfesper@duke-energy.com,
wfcatoe@duke-energy.com, kebrown@duke-energy.com, lbcrisp@duke-energy.com,
rrpadget@duke-energy.com, plsams@duke-energy.com, rtbrown@duke-energy.com,
jtconrad@duke-energy.com, odalton@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Selling to ENRON

Yesterday afternoon (1/8/01) during a conference call with ENRON, there was
a discussion regarding issues associated with hourly sales to ENRON in
order to define expectations associated with these hourly sales. Below is a
summary of the expectations and conclusions reached.

Non-Firm Energy Sales:
Duke Power regards a verbal commitment to sell non-firm hourly energy to a
customer as an agreement for Duke to sell/deliver energy to the designated
delivery point and the customer, ENRON, to purchase/receive this energy at
the designated delivery point with ENRON taking the risk of obtaining
transmission paths beyond the designated delivery point and completing
required tags correctly. After a non-firm energy schedule has begun and a
new official TLR event occurs which results in curtailing the schedule,
Duke considers this a Force Majuere event and ENRON will only be billed for
the energy delivered.

Take or Pay Energy Sales:
Duke Power regards a verbal commitment to sell Take or Pay energy to a
customer as an agreement for  the customer, ENRON, to purchase this energy
at the designated delivery point with ENRON taking all risks and accepting
to purchase all energy scheduled.

ENRON expressed the desire to develop  a strong relationship with Duke
built on conducting business "the right way". The ENRON Real-time Desk
Management is committed to this desire and are our contacts for future
problems and concerns.
Kayne Coulter, Mgr., Real-Time Desk  1-713-853-4340
Juan Hernandez, Supervisor, Real-Time Desk  1-713-853-0383


you don't know

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Shanna Husser @ EES                           02/20/2001 04:42 PM

To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Card Trick

yeah- did they remove all of the cards?

Eric Bass @ ECT   02/20/2001 04:21 PM

To: Shanna Husser/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Card Trick

---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 02/20/2001 04:20 PM
---------------------------

Jim Schwieger
02/20/2001 04:14 PM
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Card Trick

---------------------- Forwarded by Jim Schwieger/HOU/ECT on 02/20/2001 04:14
PM ---------------------------
From: Michael J Legler@ENRON on 02/19/2001 09:06 AM MST
Sent by: Michael J Legler@ENRON
To: lilybar44@hotmail.com, klexplore@aol.com, jblackwell@insiteobjects.com,
Jim Schwieger/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julie A Gomez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Meyer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Card Trick

Pretty good Card Trick here?
 - cardtrick.pps
 - Are_you_a_professional.pps


I created deal #439909 for August.

Jeff - I am assuming that the price for August is Gas Daily.  Currently, we
have the September deal priced at Gas Daily also.  Since this was flowing on
the first, should the price be at Inside Ferc HSC for September?

D

Mary Poorman@ENRON
10/13/2000 03:42 PM
To: Mary Poorman/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Austin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carlos J
Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: Saxet Canales meter 980437 for August, 2000

Sorry about that, I had some tech difficulty with the first version and the
subject line, which was pertinent, was not included.

Mary

 - Good catch Carlos


Thanks!


Money Mail from CNBC
Visit us online at http://www.cnbc.com/mm.html
To cancel or change your subscription options, please
follow the instructions at the end of this message.

----------------------ADVERTISEMENT-----------------------
SAY YES TO WIRELESS TRADING
*NO exchange fees *NO application fees
*NO start-up fees *NO monthly fees
Mydiscountbroker offers a great value on wireless trading.
Other than our modest trade commissions, the ONLY fee you
pay is to the web-access provider for your wireless device.
Visit:
http://www.cnbc.com/common/redirect.html?ReferrerID=MMT604&site=http://www.Mydiscountbroker.com
Member NASD/SIPC.

----------------------------------------------------------

Good evening!
Here is your Money Mail for Monday, June 4.

BUZZ AT THE BELL
Stocks shuffled aimlessly Monday in quiet trading,
eventually closing slightly higher across the board.
Neither a healthy inflation outlook from the Federal
Reserve chairman nor a bleak semiconductor sales report
seemed to excite investors.

Blue chips sported the biggest gains as the Dow Jones
industrial average rose a whopping 0.6 percent, gaining 71
points to 11,062. The Nasdaq Composite edged up 7 to 2,156
and the Standard & Poor's 500 climbed 6 to 1,267.

Overnight, Fed chief Alan Greenspan told a Singapore
monetary-policy conference that U.S. inflation is under
control, at least as far as consumers are concerned.
Normally, that would be something to shout about. But
Greenspan blunted any optimistic response by pointing out
the reason inflation remains at bay: In order to fend off
competition and keep you and me as customers, companies are
accepting slimmer profit margins instead of raising prices.

Greenspan's comments inspired an early pop that quickly
fizzled.

The other big piece of before-the-bell news -- the
Semiconductor Industry Association's April sales report --
exerted a more lasting influence, but only on chip stocks.
The SIA said chip sales slumped 4.7 percent in April from
March. In response, producers of both chips and chip-making
equipment lost ground. Applied Micro Devices fell more than
6 percent and Applied Materials lost about 2.5 percent.
Industry giant Intel was little changed, while shares of
Cypress Semiconductor actually rose, despite the company's
profit warning.

Oil-related shares rose as crude prices bubbled higher,
this time in response to more threats of supply disruption
from Iraq. The S&P oil-drilling group climbed 2.3 percent,
while the more diversified oil-and-gas group rose 1.5
percent. Triton Energy, meanwhile, surged more than 15
percent after the company announced a huge oilfield
discovery off the African coast.

More broadly, about two-thirds of S&P industry groups
tallied gains, although nothing moved particularly fast or
far.

Scott Gerlach
Managing Editor, CNBC.com

MAJOR INDEXES AND VOLUMES
* Dow Jones Industrials: 11,061.65, up 71.24 or 0.65%
* Dow Jones Transports: 2,878.24, down 8.81 or 0.31%
* Dow Jones Utilities: 390.25, up 0.73 or 0.19%
* S&P 500: 1,267.12, up 6.45 or 0.51%
* NASDAQ Composite Index: 2,155.99, up 6.55 or 0.30%
* Russell 2000: 507.32, up 5.60 or 1.12%
* FTSE: 5,861.00, up 51.40 or 0.88%
* NIKKEI: 13,312.35, up 50.51 or 0.38%
* Ten-Year Treasury Note Yield: 5.33%, down 0.03 or 0.56%

* NYSE volume (preliminary): 839 million shares
* Nasdaq volume (preliminary): 1.30 billion shares

* To see our complete U.S. index list,
http://www.cnbc.com/news/markets/world.html?ReferrerID=MM

SCOUTING REPORT: TUESDAY
Late spring can feel an awful lot like summer. A light
economic calendar and slow trickle of earnings reports
could spell -- say it with me -- quiet trading. Of course,
making that prediction leaves one vulnerable to all sorts
of surprises. So tomorrow looks slow, but that could change
with the morning headlines.

ECONOMIC CALENDAR:
*April factory orders, forecast: -2.7 percent
*Revised Q1 productivity, forecast: -0.7 percent

STOCKS
* AOL Still Spells Growth *
Most analysts like AOL Time Warner's prospects for growing
its bottomline.
http://www.cnbc.com/010604mcreynolds-stocks.html?ReferrerID=MM

* Pick of the Week: Alliant *
Alliant Techsystems may be the best defense industry stock
to buy now, analysts say.
http://www.cnbc.com/010604thompson-stocks.html?ReferrerID=MM

----------------------ADVERTISEMENT-----------------------
GE Prepaid Offers Great Rates On Long Distance.
Only 10c per minute!

Kids away at camp...  Family at the beach... Traveling on
business...  GE Prepaid Virtual Phone Cards is a terrific
way to keep in touch with family and friends.  Only 10c per
minute for all calls in the US.  Buy a GE Prepaid Virtual
Phone Card online and start saving NOW!.  Just click here:
http://www.cnbc.com/common/redirect.html?ReferrerID=MMB604&site=http://www.geprepaid.com/indexPP.jsp?WhoAmI=CNBC

----------------------------------------------------------

TOMORROW ON CNBC
* Squawk Box Guest Host: David Simon, Twin Capital
Management.
* To view the latest CNBC guest list:
http://www.cnbc.com/cnbctv/shows/guestlist.html?ReferrerID=MM

HOTSPOTS ON CNBC.COM
* CNBC Store:
http://www.cnbc.com/common/redirect.html?ReferrerID=MM&site=http://service.bfast.com/bfast/click?bfmid=1064298%26siteid=36208939%26bfpage=cn
* Golf Center:
http://www.cnbc.com/worklife/lifestyle/golf.html?ReferrerID=MM
* Loan Center:
http://www.cnbc.com/finance/loan/index.html?ReferrerID=MM
* Message Boards:
http://www.cnbc.com/community/index.html?ReferrerID=MM
* Small Business Center:
http://www.cnbc.com/finance/smallbiz/index.html?ReferrerID=MM
* Your Portfolio:
http://www.cnbc.com/portfolio/defaultscreen.html?ReferrerID=MM

Please do not reply to this email. It is sent from an
unmonitored address.

To cancel or change your subscription options, please go to
our Money Mail FAQ page
(http://www.cnbc.com/hlp/moneymailhelp.html) and follow the
instructions. If you cannot click on the link, copy and
paste it into your browser.

If you are interested in advertising with CNBC, please go
to our Advertising Info page
(http://www.cnbc.com/common/footerlinks/adsales.html). If
you cannot click on this link, copy and paste in into your
browser.


Drew,

Louise and Robert have brought me into the loop on the employee in London who
has had some issues.  I would appreciate it if you would fax me a copy of his
agreement.  I will be out of the office tomorrow, so, if possible, could you
fax it to my house first thing in the morning?  713-218-7355 is the fax
number.  If you send it around 5:30 am Houston time, then I can have time to
review it and incorporate its provisions into the draft correspondence that I
will prepare on this topic.  I am going to be attending a seminar out of the
office starting around 8:00 am Houston time.

I will prepare draft correspondence and circulate it to you, Robert, and
Louise for comment and dart-throwing.  I can be reached via my cell phone
during the day at 713-302-5522.

Thanks, Drew.

Michelle


Over the next several months Enron will be phasing in a new expense-reporting
product, Concur Technologies, Expense Management System (XMS).  You will be
able to prepare your expense report, send it for approval, and transmit it
for payment using the Intranet.  It will be far more user-friendly than the
Excel-based form currently in use and will provide a truly paperless
process.  In addition, the system efficiently integrates with the SAP
accounting system.

On October 16, employees who used a prior version of the product upgraded to
the most current release.  On October 30, it will be available to Enron Corp
employees, Company 0011.  The rollout to other groups will continue through
January 2001.  Rollout announcements will be made to each business unit.

In Houston, IT Central will provide four training sessions per week. To
enroll in a class go to itcentral.enron.com and click on
Services>Training>Schedules. Those in outlying locations and those who prefer
on-line training can use LEAP by signing on to sap.enron.com and clicking on
Training, then LEAP.  Use xms (lower case) as the User ID and Password.

We are excited about this new system and hope you will find it useful.  If
you have questions regarding its use contact IT Central at (713) 345-4727 or
visit their website.


Go with Ina

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Badeer, Robert
Sent:	Friday, March 08, 2002 11:08 AM
To:	Grigsby, Mike
Subject:	RE: BADGE

Grigs,
	Ina said it would be on the 5th floor of the new building. Which is right?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Grigsby, Mike
Sent:	Friday, March 08, 2002 6:46 AM
To:	Badeer, Robert
Subject:	BADGE

Your badge will be waiting for you at the front desk in the north tower on mon.  if not, then call and we will retrieve you.

Michael D. Grigsby, Executive Director
UBS Warburg Energy, LLC
Work: 713-853-7031
Mobile: 713-408-6256


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 07/13/2001 05:14 PM -----

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	07/13/2001 05:13 PM

		 To: Ann.Cohn@sce.com, "'Barbara Barkovich (E-mail)'"
<brbarkovich@earthlink.net>, "Dominic DiMare (E-mail)"
<dominic.DiMare@calchamber.com>, "'Dorothy Rothrock (E-mail)'"
<drothrock@cmta.net>, "'John Fielder (E-mail)'" <fieldejr@sce.com>, "'Phil
Isenberg (E-mail)'" <isenberg@hmot.com>, "'Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)'"
<jdasovic@enron.com>, "'Keith McCrea (E-mail)'" <kmccrea@sablaw.com>, "'Linda
Sherif (E-mail)'" <lys@a-klaw.com>, "'Linda Sherif (E-mail 2)'"
<lysherif@yahoo.com>, "'Gary Schoonyan (E-mail)'" <schoongl@sce.com>, "'John
White (E-mail)'" <vjw@cleanpower.org>, <dhunter@s-k-w.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Dow Jones--PUC to Raise Rates Another 25% to Cover DWR Contracts?

Calif DWR Seen Asking PUC To Order 25% Rate Increase Fri
By Jason Leopold

07/13/2001
Dow Jones Energy Service
(Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)

Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES
(This article was originally published earlier Friday.)

LOS ANGELES -(Dow Jones)- The California Department of Water Resources, the
agency purchasing a bulk of the state's power needs in lieu of the three
investor-owned utilities, is expected to tell state regulators Friday that
they need to increase electricity rates by as much as 25%.

This is because there are insufficient funds in the current revenue stream
to cover a $13.4 billion bond sale, three commissioners with the Public
Utilities Commission told Dow Jones Newswires late Thursday.

PUC President Loretta Lynch is expected to issue a draft decision Friday
either endorsing the rate hike request or calling for an audit of the DWR's
current revenue stream before she makes a decision, aides in her office
said.

If the PUC determines that there are not enough funds in the current rate
structure to cover the bond sale, it will have no choice but to order the
rate increase, according to the legislation that put the state in the power
buying business.

Businesses are expected to bear most of the burden of the rate increase,
the second in just two months, if approved by the PUC, the commissioners
said.
"Back in May when we ordered the first rate increase, we said we may be
forced to do it again by the summer," one commissioner said.

"It's unfortunate, but it shouldn't be a shock to anyone. The state has
made an enormous commitment to Wall Street that rates would go up whenever
it's needed to ensure there is enough money to pay off those bonds."

Lynch and a spokesman for the DWR were unavailable for comment late
Thursday.

Separately, Assembly Speaker Pro Tem Fred Keeley, D-Boulder Creek, has
drafted a proposal expected to be introduced into the Assembly Friday or
Saturday that would have large businesses using the most electricity to
finance the bulk of the $43 billion in long-term power supply contracts,
aides in his office said.
Moreover, Keeley's plan is aimed at reducing rates for consumers who use
the least amount of power. Details of the plan are still sketchy, aides
said.

Possible Rate Hike To Generate $2.5B Yearly For State

The 50% rate increase ordered in May is expected to generate $5 billion
annually, and if the PUC orders a 25% increase, that is expected to
generate $2.5 billion. However, it is still unclear if that is enough, the
commissioners said.

Businesses are expected to bear most of the burden of the rate increase,
the second in four months, if approved by the PUC, the three commissioners
said.
Since January, the state has spent nearly $8.5 billion buying electricity
on behalf of customers of Edison International (EIX) unit Southern
California Edison, Sempra Energy (SRE) unit San Diego Gas & Electric and
PG&E Corp. (PCG) unit Pacific Gas & Electric.

The state has borrowed more than $7 billion from its general fund, which
must be repaid by ratepayers at 6% interest, to purchase power.

In addition, the state has locked itself into $43 billion in long-term
power supply contracts at high prices for as much as 20 years to ensure
there is enough power to meet demand. Future rate increases to finance the
contracts are likely, state officials have said.

But if the PUC orders another rate increase, the money won't benefit the
utilities, which have billions of dollars in power costs to recover.
Instead, it will be used to guarantee Wall Street financial institutions
that there is sufficient funds in the rate structure to allow $13.4 billion
in revenue bonds to be sold.

The bonds are expected to be sold in August or September, said state
Treasurer Phil Angelides.

The commissioners said the PUC and the DWR waited to address another rate
hike to see if state officials and generators were successful in coming to
terms on $8.9 billion the state says it was overcharged for power since
last year.

After two weeks of hearings between generators and a delegation of
California utility executives and energy officials, talks broke down
Monday. Generators offered the state $716 million in refunds, but Gov. Gray
Davis balked, threatening to sue to recover the full $8.9 billion.

Any refunds would have been disbursed to the utilities and the DWR, which
could have deferred the need for any rate increase, according to Steve
Maviglio, press secretary to Davis.

An administrative law judge with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
said Thursday he will recommend that the commission not order cash refunds
to California because the state's utilities owe far more money to the
generators than what he thinks the state is owed.

-By Jason Leopold; Dow Jones Newswires; 323-658-3874;
jason.leopold@dowjones.com


Good to hear from you Kim.  First, I did get the check.. I've been out of the office for over two weeks so it will be cashed this week sometime. Sorry about that.   I had not heard anything about a suprise party for Rich in Houston but regardless, with Red Rock, annual outages etc...  it would probably be a difficult time for me.  If I can help with anything please give me a yell.  The next trip to Houston, will probably tie in with a family vacation to Tx. sometime in July.

We are making arrangements to give Rich a retirement party in the field as well.  I was responsible for donations as you know (got to keep it quiet now but we are getting him a four wheeler).  Rick and Arnie are setting up the party which will probably be on April 13 and most likely in Belen, Nm.

Again, the check will be cashed this week. and thanks to all of you....  My wife is making a card and we will have your names included...
---------------------- Forwarded by David Roensch/ET&S/Enron on 03/19/2002 11:08 AM ---------------------------
From:	Kimberly Watson/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/19/2002 11:04 AM CST
To:	David Roensch/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject:	Rich Jolly

Tiny,

I just received a message that Rich is going to retire at the end of the month.  I understand that there is a surprise lunch for him in Houston on March 29.  Will you be attending?  Let us know, we'd like to meet with you if you are going to be in town.  Did you receive the $50 check I sent you for Rich's gift?  When I was reconciling my checking account a couple of weeks ago, I noticed it had not cleared yet.  I just want to make sure it did not get lost in the mail.

Good luck on Bisti!

Thanks, Kim.


The Supreme Court cleared the way yesterday for the EPA to enforce its new
"NOx SIP Call" regulations aimed at reducing NOx emissions in the eastern
half of the U.S..?  The Court refused to hear an appeal by several electric
utilities and Midwest states, which contended that the EPA had used improper
criteria in setting the regulations.? The Supreme Court's decision lets stand
a March 2000 ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit that
upheld the regulations.?

This means the NOx SIP Call regulations will go into effect with an
implementation date of May 2004.

Under the original SIP Call regulations, 22 states (AL, CT, DE, GA, IL, IN,
KY, MD, MA, MI, MO, NJ, NY, NC, OH, PA, RI, SC, TN, VA, WV, WI) and the
District of Columbia were required to submit State Implementation Plans
(SIPs) to EPA by October 31, 2000 (with a grace period until December 31,
2000).   Some states submitted SIPs by the deadline, but many are still in
the process of developing SIPs.  Those states that do not submit SIPs or
whose SIPs are not approved by EPA will be subject to a fallback Federal rule
(FIP) and lose the ability to control NOx emissions from their sources.  A
few states were excluded from the SIP requirement as a result of the
litigation, but those states are in the process of developing SIPs anyway.

Now that the SIP call is final, we will be back to you shortly with further
analysis of the SIP development efforts the states and other intelligence
about what states and sources may be doing in anticipation of the regulations.

Please call if you have any questions.

Jeffrey Keeler
Director, Environmental Strategies
Enron
Washington DC office - (202) 466-9157
Cell Phone (203) 464-1541


Please read the attached memo from Rick Shapiro along with the attachments.

Thanks.


Cheryl,
This is the one pager subscription agreement.
sg
---------------------- Forwarded by Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT on 05/30/2001 03:11
PM ---------------------------
From: Selena Gonzalez/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/30/2001 01:18 PM
To: Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: SNL Data Source contract

Sheila,

Attached is a contract from SNL data source to provide financial data.  Gary
has given his OK.  Can you forward this on to legal for the proper review?

Thanks a bunch,

Selena

If you have any questions please let me know.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Ellen Gulczynski (NY 206)  [mailto:EGulczynski@snl.com]
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 9:12 PM
To: 'mike.fowler@enron.com' ; 'selena.gonzalez@enron.com'
Subject: SNL DataSource contract

Mike and Selena-

Attached is the quote for services document.  Please review it and call me
if you have questions.

Also, I've instruction our Subscriptions dept. to send the daily newletters
to Mike for the duration of your trial, however, this may take a day to kick
in.

Thanks and regards,

Ellen

 <<Enron Corp. BTFqfs.doc>>

Ellen A. Gulczynski
SNL DataSource
egulczynski@snl.com
t - 201-963-1000
f - 804-244-4608

 SNL Securities is the leading information and research company
focusing on the banking, thrift, real estate, insurance, specialized
financial services and energy industries. SNL collects financial, market,
corporate, M&A and operating data on the public and private companies in
these industries and transmits it to the sectors' top executives, investors,
securities analysts, investment bankers, ratings and regulatory agencies,
credit analysts, consultants, and attorneys.

 - Enron Corp. BTFqfs.doc


6:00 Photographer


Cecilia, please go ahead and set up the books.  Thanks!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lewis,  Jon Paul
Sent:	Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:47 AM
To:	Chang, Fran
Subject:	RE: New Gas Book Request

Yes, if she has the codes.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Chang, Fran
Sent:	Thursday, January 17, 2002 11:46 AM
To:	Dahlke, Andrea; Lewis,  Jon Paul
Subject:	FW: New Gas Book Request

Hi Andrea and J.P.:

I remembered the other day you advised we should wait on this book request until further notice, but today Cecilia said she has aleady got the book codes from Bill Hare.  (please see the attached email below)

Should we ask Cecilia to go ahead?

-Fran

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cheung, Cecilia
Sent:	Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:25 AM
To:	Chang, Fran; White, Stacey W.
Cc:	Wong, Jeremy
Subject:	FW: New Gas Book Request

Should I go ahead and create the following books in ERMTT, ERMTP & ESTERMTP?  Thanks.

CP ID	Short Name	Long Name	Internal	External	Both	Code	Region	P	B	Idx	GD	PHY	Y	Commodity/UOM/Curr
166966	PWR-GAS-WMGMT	POWERGASWESTMANAGEMENT	x			MJ	NYMEX	x						NG/MMBTU/USD
166967	PWR-GAS-NW	POWERGASNORTHWEST	x			MJ	NYMEX	x						NG/MMBTU/USD
166968	PWR-GAS-SW	POWERGASSOUTHWEST	x			MJ	NYMEX	x						NG/MMBTU/USD
166969	PWR-GAS-CALI	POWERGASCALIFORNIA	x			MJ	NYMEX	x						NG/MMBTU/USD

Cecilia
x53362

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hare, Bill D.
Sent:	Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:47 AM
To:	Lewis,  Jon Paul; Smith, Will; Rodriguez, Bernice; Cheung, Cecilia; Valdes, John; Yang, Zhiyun
Cc:	Theriot, Kim S.; Chitradurga, Sundar
Subject:	RE: New Gas Book Request

Jon,

I have completed the request for book setups and attached the completed sheet with ID's.  I have a few contacts to complete within the next 10 minutes.

Bill

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lewis,  Jon Paul
Sent:	Wednesday, January 16, 2002 3:54 PM
To:	Smith, Will; Hare, Bill D.; Rodriguez, Bernice; Cheung, Cecilia; Valdes, John; Yang, Zhiyun
Subject:	New Gas Book Request

We have already created gas books for the top half of the list.  We now need to attach Gas Daily (I and Y risk types)to these books.  Also, we need to create gas books for the bottom half of the list, as well as, attach Gas Daily (I and Y risk types).

Thank you.

J.P.

 << File: New Book Request TAGGII.xls >>


Start Date: 2/4/02; HourAhead hour: 4;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.


electronically tagged prior to departure, though, I'm sure.

Hey, did you sent the check yet?  (signed, scrooge)

	"Scott Laughlin" <scottwl@hotmail.com>
	04/26/2001 01:25 PM

		 To: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: MORGAN

Oh, I guess they're going to let her go off to Columbia now...

>From: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com
>To: "Scott Laughlin" <scottwl@hotmail.com>
>Subject: Re: MORGAN
>Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 13:09:50 -0500
>
>
>o mah gawd, you're kidding, right?
>
>
>
>                     "Scott
>                     Laughlin"            To:
>Nancy.Sellers@RobertMondavi.com,
>                     <scottwl@hotm        cameron@perfect.com,
>Jeff_Dasovich@enron.com,
>                     ail.com>             PSellers@haas.berkeley.edu,
>PSellers@pacbell.net
>                                          cc:     Eldon@direcpc.com
>                     04/26/2001           Subject:     Re: MORGAN
>                     01:03 PM
>
>
>
>
>
>And she's going to go to Carmel Valley Junior College??
>
>
> >From: Nancy Sellers <Nancy.Sellers@RobertMondavi.com>
> >To: Cameron <cameron@perfect.com>, Jeff Dasovich
><Jeff_Dasovich@enron.com>,
> >"Prentice @ Berkeley" <PSellers@haas.berkeley.edu>, Prentice Sellers
> ><PSellers@pacbell.net>, Scott Laughlin <scottwl@hotmail.com>
> >CC: 'Eldon Sellers' <Eldon@direcpc.com>
> >Subject: MORGAN
> >Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 08:29:51 -0700
> >
> >Morgan got a 790/790 on her SAT - I guess she'll have to take it over!
> >
> >Nancy
> >(707) 251-4870 (phone)
> >(707) 265-5446 (fax)
> >"Plus je bois, mieux je chante"
> >
> >
> >
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
>
>
>
>
>

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com


Please see attached credit sheet for credit language to attach to the confirm.

Thanks
Russell


fyi.

-----Original Message-----
From: Ordway, Chris
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 8:15 AM
To: Boudreaux, Shanna; Garcia, Clarissa; Lamadrid, Victor; Townsend,
Judy; Versen, Victoria
Subject: FW: TE Critical System Warning

FYI...

Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: infopost@duke-energy.com [mailto:infopost@duke-energy.com]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 12:00 AM
To: infopost@duke-energy.com
Subject: TE Critical System Warning

November 26, 2001

As indicated by the Critical System Warning issued November 25, 2001,
based on anticipated system operations and weather conditions, as stated
below, TEXAS EASTERN TRANSMISSION, LP (Texas Eastern) is requiring that
all customers take immediate and prompt steps to eliminate excess
receipts and conform scheduled receipts to actual deliveries. This
system-wide warning is issued as a result of actual receipts into the
system significantly exceeding actual deliveries. This Critical System
Warning shall remain in place until further notice.

Weather in the market area continues to be unseasonably mild and
shippers have been filling contract storage inventories in anticipation
of the coming winter heating season.  At this time, Texas Eastern's
storage capacity is approximately 98% full.  As a result, there is
virtually no storage capacity or linepack available for system
operational purposes and Texas Eastern cannot continue to absorb actual
imbalances left on the system.

Because of the critical nature of this situation and the fact that Texas
Eastern no longer has the ability to further absorb imbalances being
left on the system, Texas Eastern requests that all customers coordinate
with their suppliers the actual quantities received into the system to
match actual customer takes in the market area.  No due pipe gas will be
accepted into the system until further notice.

If immediate action does not result in reducing the current volume of
gas being left on the system, Texas Eastern may be forced to issue an
operational flow order ("OFO") requiring actual receipts of gas to match
actual deliveries out of the system, which will be subject to the OFO
non-compliance penalty of $25 per dekatherm.  In addition and as
provided for in Texas Eastern's FERC Gas Tariff, Texas Eastern will take
any other actions as may be necessary to protect the integrity of its
system, including, but not limited to, suspension of OBA's.

*******************************************************************

NOTE:

Duke Energy Gas Transmission respects your online time and privacy.
You have received this email because you elected to subscribe. To
unsubscribe, login to the E-mail Notification Subscription page at
http://www.link.duke-energy.com/script2/Notification.asp
uncheck the appropriate checkbox, and click the Submit button.