Greg,

Transport Deals/Transport Model
OA
Relationships between systems (Tagg, Sitara, Portcalc, MetaCalc, Curveview,
Excel, Access, Pub Posting, TDS)

These are mostly basic.

DG

Greg Couch
04/17/2001 01:16 PM
To: Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, Darron C
Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David
Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Valdes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Martha Stevens/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Russ Severson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE: Revival of the Risk brown bag sessions

Just a reminder to each of you that I requested this info by tomorrow.  I've
received only one response so far.

Let me know if you have questions.

Greg

---------------------- Forwarded by Greg Couch/HOU/ECT on 04/17/2001 01:13 PM
---------------------------

Greg Couch
04/10/2001 05:36 PM
To: Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, Darron C
Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David
Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Valdes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Martha Stevens/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Russ Severson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Irena D Hogan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Revival of the Risk brown bag sessions

I have decided to revive the risk brown bag training sessions.

I need, from each of you, a list of the topics you would like to see
covered.  I would like to see topics ranging from the most basic, up -
whatever you feel is necessary for your group.  Please provide these to me no
later than 04/18.  Feel free to offer anything.  Think about the concepts in
the training modules while you are compiling your lists.

Once I have the topics, I will work with you to arrange a logical order to
cover them in.  After that  Irena and I will set up a calendar, with
approximately one session per month.  I am targeting mid-May for the first
session.

The format of each session is up to the presenter, but a couple of
suggestions are: a short presentation followed by Q&A, or an open forum.
Each session will be led by one of you, a suitable substitute, Jeff, or I,
depending on the topic.  I will schedule, with your input and cooperation,
who will present each topic.

I am also sending this note to John and Russ.

John, I ask that you think about OA concepts that you feel will benefit the
risk group, help our personnel work better with your group, and help us
understand your duties better.  I would like for you to present at least a
couple of topics to us.

Russ, if you think there are Sitara issues that would benefit the group,
please let me know.

I am open to whether these sessions are mandatory or not.  My feeling is that
some should be and others (the ones of a more basic nature) should only be
mandatory for those people you feel need that month's subject matter.  Let me
know your opinion on this.

With a small investment of your time, I believe this will be an excellent
vehicle to get (and keep) topics of interest and training in front of your
people.

I look forward to receiving your lists.  Let me know if you have any
questions.

Greg


Caroline - I think you captured the right projects, but please look at the bottom line on total reductions.  You show $3 Million in savings.  I think that the schedule should reflect over $6 million of reductions from the original cap. budget.

In my mind there is still a question on whether the meter bounce and PNR projects should be included.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Barnes, Caroline
Sent:	Thursday, December 06, 2001 5:19 PM
To:	Corman, Shelley; Holmes, Bradley; January, Steve; Ratliff, Dale; Kenagy, Gary; Scott, Donna
Cc:	Krone, Amy; Carpenter, Nancy
Subject:	Revised 2002 Gas Logistics Capital Budget

Please see attached.  On the Rates & Revenue I have everyone paying up their share of the base.   Cvb

 << File: IT 2002 Capital - 120601.xls >>   Bottom line  -  $5,781,880


----- Original Message -----
From: Suzanne  Tonini
To: kward1@houston.rr.com
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 4:30 PM
Subject: We would like to contact you regarding your  qualifications
  Good afternoon!  I accessed your name on the 1400smith.com list. We are an executive  search firm specializing in placements within the power and energy  industry nationwide, and your title comes up as a good fit for several of  our current searches.  Would you be so kind as to send a Word copy of your resume along with  your contact information so that one of our search consultants can speak  to you about a career opportunity?   Looking forward to hearing from you, and have a great  day!  Sincerely,   Suzanne Tonini Internet Research Pangaea Technology Resources 563 SW 13th St #100 Bend, OR. 97701 (541) 382-9779 stonini@pangaeatek.com

____________________________________________________[IMAGE]   IncrediMail  - Email has finally evolved - Click  Here


Please do

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Luce, Laura
Sent:	Monday, October 08, 2001 5:36 PM
To:	Kitchen, Louise
Subject:	MGU

MGU and Utilicorp are meeting via conference call Tuesday morning on the recommended structure.  We have appropriately scripted MGU on the merits and need for immediate closure to hit the November 1 start.

I will keep you posted.

Laura


continental.com Specials for Grace Blair
Wednesday, December 26, 2001
****************************************

EUROPE FARE SALE

Shopping Spree in Milan...History lesson in Rome. Design your own dream vacation now while exciting European destinations are on sale. Hurry, seats are limited for this special online offer.

Purchase your eTickets now at:
http://continentalairlines.rsc01.net/servlet/cc4?JHEVAY*nIsHpkQLgkhgEJht*z*VA

TRAVEL UPDATES
Be sure to check continental.com at:
http://continentalairlines.rsc01.net/servlet/cc4?JHEVAY*nIsHpkQLgkhgEJht*z*XA
before leaving for the airport. We're looking forward to welcoming you onboard!

****************************************
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. This Week's Destinations
2. Hilton Hotels & Resorts, Doubletree Hotels & Resorts, & Embassy Suites Hotels Offers
3. Westin Hotels & Resorts, Sheraton Hotels & Resorts, Four Points by Sheraton, St. Regis, The Luxury Collection and W Hotels Offers
4. Alamo Rent A Car Offers
5. National Car Rental Offers

****************************************
1. THIS WEEK'S DESTINATIONS

Depart Saturday, December 29 and return on either Monday, December 31 or Tuesday, January 1, 2002. Please see the Terms and Conditions listed at the end of this e-mail.

Purchase continental.com Specials online until 11:59pm (CST) Friday at:
http://continentalairlines.rsc01.net/servlet/cc4?JHEVAY*nIsHpkQLgkhgEJht*z*YA
You can also purchase continental.com Specials for an additional cost of $20 per ticket through our telephone service at 1-800-642-1617.

**********************************************
ROUND-TRIP TRAVEL MAY ORIGINATE IN EITHER CITY
**********************************************
****Roundtrip BETWEEN CLEVELAND, OH and:

$109 - Richmond, VA

****Roundtrip BETWEEN HOUSTON, TX and:

$109 - Lafayette, LA
$109 - Mobile, AL
$109 - Shreveport, LA

****Roundtrip BETWEEN NEW YORK/NEWARK and:

$119 - Greenville/Spartanburg, SC

********************************
2. CONTINENTAL.COM SPECIALS FROM HILTON HOTELS AND RESORTS, DOUBLETREE
HOTELS AND RESORTS, AND EMBASSY SUITES HOTELS

The following rates are available December 29 - December 31, 2001 and are priced per night.
--------------------------------------
Cleveland, OH - Hilton Garden Inn Cleveland Airport - $109
Cleveland, OH - Hilton Cleveland East/Beachwood, Beachwood, OH - $109
Cleveland, OH - Embassy Suites Hotel Cleveland-Downtown - $99

Houston, TX - Hilton Houston Westchase and Towers - $65
Houston, TX - Hilton Houston Hobby Airport - $79

Lafayette, LA - Hilton Lafayette and Towers - $69

Newark, NJ - Hilton Pearl River, Pearl River, NY - $85/Night, 12/29-30
Newark, NJ - Hilton Parsippany, Parsippany, NJ - $109
Newark, NJ - Hilton Fort Lee at the George Washington Bridge, Fort Lee, NJ - $169
Newark, NJ - Hilton Rye Town, Rye Brook, NY - $119
Newark, NJ - Hilton Woodcliff Lake, Woodcliff Lake, NJ - $99/Night, 12/29 - 30
Newark, NJ - Hilton Newark Gateway, Newark, NJ - $169
Newark, NJ - Doubletree Club Suites Jersey City, Jersey City, NJ - $129

To book this week's special rates for Hilton Family Hotels, visit and book at:
http://continentalairlines.rsc01.net/servlet/cc4?JHEVAY*nIsHpkQLgkhgEJht*z*ZA
Special rates apply only for the dates listed at each hotel and are subject to availability. Check hilton.com for specific dates at each Hilton Family Hotel. Or call at 1-800-774-1500 and ask for Value Rates. Restrictions apply to these rates.

****************************************
3. CONTINENTAL.COM SPECIALS LAST-MINUTE WEEKEND RATES FROM WESTIN HOTELS & RESORTS, SHERATON HOTELS & RESORTS, FOUR POINTS BY SHERATON, ST. REGIS, THE LUXURY COLLECTION, AND W HOTELS

There are no offerings from Westin Hotels & Resorts, Sheraton Hotels & Resorts, Four Points by Sheraton, St. Regis, The Luxury Collection and W Hotels this week.

********************************
4. CONTINENTAL.COM SPECIALS FROM ALAMO RENT A CAR

Rates listed below are valid on compact class vehicles at airport locations only. Other car types may be available. Rates are valid for rentals on Saturday, December 29 with returns Monday, December 31 or Tuesday, January 1, 2002.
-------------------------------
$20 a day in:  Cleveland, OH (CLE)
$18 a day in:  Houston, TX (IAH)
$26 a day in:  Newark, NJ (EWR)

To receive continental.com Specials discounted rates, simply make advance reservations and be sure to request ID # 596871 and Rate Code 33. Book your reservation online at:
http://continentalairlines.rsc01.net/servlet/cc4?JHEVAY*nIsHpkQLgkhgEJht*z*AA
or contact Alamo at 1-800 GO ALAMO.

*If you are traveling to a city or a different date that is not listed, Alamo offers great rates when you book online at:
http://continentalairlines.rsc01.net/servlet/cc4?JHEVAY*nIsHpkQLgkhgEJht*z*BA
For complete details on these offers, please refer to Alamo's terms and conditions below.

****************************************
5. CONTINENTAL.COM SPECIALS FROM NATIONAL CAR RENTAL

Rates listed below are valid on intermediate class vehicles at airport locations only. Other car types may be available. Rates are valid for rentals on Saturday, December 29 with returns Monday, December 31 or Tuesday, January 1, 2002.
------------------------------------------
$23 a day in:  Cleveland, OH (CLE)
$23 a day in:  Greenville, Spartanburg, SC (GSP)
$21 a day in:  Houston, TX (IAH)
$29 a day in:  Lafayette, LA (LFT)
$21 a day in:  Mobile, AL (MOB)
$29 a day in:  Newark, NJ (EWR)
$23 a day in:  Richmond, VA (RIC)

To receive continental.com Specials discounted rates, simply make your reservations in advance and be sure to request Product Code COOLUS. To make your reservation, contact National at 1-800-CAR-RENT (1-800-227-7368), or book your reservation online at:
http://continentalairlines.rsc01.net/servlet/cc4?JHEVAY*nIsHpkQLgkhgEJht*z*CA
Please enter COOLUS in the Product Rate Code field, and 5037126 in the Contract ID field to ensure you get these rates on these dates.

* If you are traveling to a city or a different date that is not listed, National offers great rates when you book online at:
http://continentalairlines.rsc01.net/servlet/cc4?JHEVAY*nIsHpkQLgkhgEJht*z*DA
For complete details on these offers, please refer to National's terms and conditions below.

****************************************
CONTINENTAL.COM SPECIALS RULES:
Fares include a $37.20 fuel surcharge.  Passenger Facility Charges, up to $18 depending on routing, are not included. Up to $2.75 per segment federal excise tax, as applicable, is not included.  Applicable International and or Canadian taxes and fees up to $108, varying by destination, are not included and may vary slightly depending on currency exchange rate at the time of purchase. For a complete listing of rules please visit:
http://continentalairlines.rsc01.net/servlet/cc4?JHEVAY*nIsHpkQLgkhgEJht*z*VUA

ALAMO RENT A CAR'S TERMS AND CONDITIONS:
Taxes (including VLF taxes up to US$1.89 per day in California and GST), other governmentally-authorized or imposed surcharges, license recoupment fees, fuel, additional driver fee, drop charges and optional items (such as CDW Waiver Savers(R) up to US$18.99 a day,) are extra. Renter must meet standard age, driver and credit requirements. Rates higher for drivers under age 25. Concession recoupment fees may add up to 14% to the rental rate at some on-airport locations. Up to 10.75% may be added to the rental rate if you rent at an off-airport location and exit on our shuttle bus. Weekly rates require a 5-day minimum rental or daily rates apply. For weekend rates, the vehicle must be picked up after 9 a.m. on Thursday and returned before midnight on Monday or higher daily rates apply. 24-hour advance reservation required. May not be combined with other discounts. Availability is limited. All vehicles must be returned to the country of origin. Offer not valid in San Jose, CA.

NATIONAL CAR RENTAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS:
Customer must provide Contract ID# at the time of reservation to be eligible for discounts. Offer valid at participating National locations in the US and Canada. Minimum rental age is 25. This offer is not valid with any other special discount or promotion. Standard rental qualifications apply. Subject to availability and blackout dates. Advance reservations required. Geographic driving restrictions may apply.

---------------------------------------
This e-mail message and its contents are copyrighted and are proprietary products of Continental Airlines, Inc. Any unauthorized use, reproduction, or transfer of the message or its content, in any medium, is strictly prohibited.

****************************************
If you need assistance please visit:
http://continentalairlines.rsc01.net/servlet/cc4?JHEVAY*nIsHpkQLgkhgEJht*z*VVA
View our privacy policy at:
http://continentalairlines.rsc01.net/servlet/cc4?JHEVAY*nIsHpkQLgkhgEJht*z*VWA

This e-mail was sent to: gblair@enron.com

TO UNSUBSCRIBE:
We hope you will find continental.com Specials a valuable source of information. However, if you prefer not to take advantage of this opportunity, please let us know by visiting the continental.com Specials page on our web site at:
http://continentalairlines.rsc01.net/servlet/cc4?JHEVAY*nIsHpkQLgkhgEJht*z*VYA

TO SUBSCRIBE:
Please visit the continental.com Specials page on our web site at:
http://continentalairlines.rsc01.net/servlet/cc4?JHEVAY*nIsHpkQLgkhgEJht*z*VXA


I don't envy your position.  At some point, the document must be finished and
folks need to determine whether they'll sign or not.  I greatly admire Rich
Gilbert, but his comments (re: regulatory intervention is a good thing, and
now this one) will surely create considerably controversy and could greatly
upset the apple cart altogether.

Best of luck,
Jeff

Talked to Tyson.  She's really working it, which is great, and I continue to
focus my efforts there.  My company is squarely behind her efforts.  Thanks
again for organizing the meeting last weekend.

	"Richard J. Gilbert" <gilbert@econ.Berkeley.EDU>
	01/24/2001 01:03 PM

		 To: David Teece <teece@haas.berkeley.edu>
		 cc: <tyson@haas.berkeley.edu>, <tom_campbell@law.stanford.edu>,
<shmuel@euler.berkeley.edu>, <willrichm@aol.com>, <george_barker@lecg.com>,
<cdanner@wilkandassociates.com>, <scott_harvey@lecg.com>,
<jscadding@wilkandassociates.com>, <spiller@haas.berkeley.edu>,
<mwilk@wilkandassociates.com>, <phillip_mcleod@lecg.com>,
<berk@haas.berkeley.edu>, <john_chandley@lecg.com>, <jdasovic@enron.com>,
<lfried@uclink.berkeley.edu>, <william_hogan@harvard.edu>,
<rmichaels@fullerton.edu>, <richard.rumelt@anderson.ucla.edu>,
<rschmidt@lecg.com>, <pverleger@compuserve.com>, <joseph.mullinix@ucop.edu>,
<steven@stoft.com>, <peter.gosselin@latimes.com>
		 Subject: Re: Final Version-Manifesto

One more thing:

No one talked about bailing out consumers when retail prices were above
spot prices (by about $40/MWh by my calculation) in the 2+ years
following deregulation.  Surely, if we bail out
the utilities by raising prices now, consumers should be credited for the
above-market prices that they paid in the past.

Rich

------------------------
Richard J. Gilbert
Professor of Economics
549 Evans Hall
University of California
Berkeley, CA  94120-3880
tel  (510) 642-1507
fax  (510) 339-6493


Reference  jwvs email sent on 6/18/01 @ 12:04 p.m.

Thanks.

SO for JWVS


Yes, i can make a little money on the long side of a market


NOTE:  YOU WILL RECEIVE THIS MESSAGE EACH TIME YOU ARE SELECTED AS A REVIEWER.

You have been selected to participate in the Year End 2000 Performance
Management process by providing meaningful feedback on specific employee(s).
Your feedback plays an important role in the process, and your participation
is critical to the success of Enron's Performance Management goals.

To complete requests for feedback, access PEP at http://pep.corp.enron.com
and select Perform Review under Performance Review Services.  You may begin
providing feedback immediately and are requested to have all feedback forms
completed by Friday, November 17, 2000.

If you have any questions regarding PEP or your responsibility in the
process, please contact the PEP Help Desk at:

Houston: 1.713.853.4777, Option 4
London:  44.207.783.4040, Option 4
Email: perfmgmt@enron.com

Thank you for your participation in this important process.

The following is a CUMULATIVE list of employee feedback requests with a
status of "OPEN."   Once you have submitted or declined an employee's request
for feedback, their name will no longer appear on this list.

Review Group: ENRON
Feedback Due Date: Nov 17, 2000

Employee Name                   Supervisor Name                 Date Selected
-------------                   ---------------                 -------------
FRANK, CAROLE C                 JEFFREY C GOSSETT               Nov 01, 2000
GAY, RANDALL L                  ROBERT A SUPERTY                Nov 01, 2000


Info from the press conference today

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 02/08/2001 11:51 AM -----

	"Allen, Stevan" <stevan.allen@edelman.com>
	02/08/2001 10:39 AM

		 To: "Beiser, Megan" <Megan.Beiser@edelman.com>, "''nplotkin@tfglobby.com' '"
<nplotkin@tfglobby.com>, "'Aaron Thomas (E-mail) (E-mail) '"
<athomas@newenergy.com>, "'Andrea Weller (E-mail) (E-mail) '"
<aweller@sel.com>, "'andrew Chau (E-mail) (E-mail) '" <anchau@shellus.com>,
"'Bill Chen (E-mail) (E-mail) '" <bchen@newenergy.com>, "'Douglas Oglesby
(E-mail) (E-mail) '" <doao@chevron.com>, "Fairchild, Tracy"
<tracy.fairchild@edelman.com>, "'Jeffrey Hanson (E-mail) (E-mail) '"
<jeff.hanson@phaser.com>, "'jennifer Chamberlin (E-mail) (E-mail) '"
<jnnc@chevron.com>, "'john Barthrop (E-mail) (E-mail) '"
<jbarthrop@electric.com>, "'John Leslie (E-mail) (E-mail) '"
<jleslie@luce.com>, "'Joseph Alamo (E-mail) (E-mail) '" <jalamo@enron.com>,
"''Michael Nelson' (E-mail) '" <mnelson@electric.com>, "'Mona Petrochka
(E-mail) '" <mpetroch@enron.com>, "'Peter Bray (E-mail) (E-mail) '"
<pbray@newpower.com>, "'Rebecca Schlanert (E-mail) (E-mail) '"
<rschlanert@electric.com>, "'Richard Counihan (E-mail) (E-mail) '"
<rick.counihan@greenmountain.com>, "''Robert Morgan' (E-mail) '"
<rmorgan@newenergy.com>, "'Sue Mara (E-mail) (E-mail) '" <smara@enron.com>
		 cc: "Warner, Jami" <jami.warner@edelman.com>, "Manuel, Erica"
<Erica.Manuel@edelman.com>, "Fairchild, Tracy" <tracy.fairchild@edelman.com>,
"Anderson, Kristin" <Kristin.Anderson@edelman.com>
		 Subject: AReM: Angelides News Conf

AReM Team:
The following is an overview from:

9 a.m., SACRAMENTO _ State Treasurer Phil Angelides
holds media briefing to discuss issuance of energy-related bonds, 915
Capitol
Mall, room 110. Contact: Colleen Beamish, 916-653-4052.

While we have not had time to analyze or digest in detail, here is what
Angelides said:

Angelides: Laid out what needs to be done for the Treasurer's office to
implement AB 1X and what is and isn't appropriate role of the state for
getting the IOUs solvent.

Angelides: "These will be largest (amount of) municipal bonds issued in
nation's history."

Angelides: Estimated bonds would be in $10 billion range. (This echoes what
he said in Jan. 5 news conference)

Angelides: Goal is to arrange short-term external financing by beginning of
March. This would account for about $2 billion. If they don't get that
amount by March 1, 2001, the State will tap into the General Fund.   (NOTE:
This appears to be different from the $2 billion he talked about last month
for the renewable energy and conservation load program -- the reserve fund
he would use to reduce the intereset paid to the consumers.)

Angelides: It is "fortunate" that this is happening when State of California
currently has a $5.8 billion surplus.

Angelides: By passing AB 1X, the State has "provided for stability on a
going forward basis" for the utilities.

Angelides: "The next step is for the utilities." -- i.e. - the ball is in
their court because the IOUs aren't now in a position where they necessarily
are going to be insolvent, so they have decisions to make. Do they want to
sell off transmission assets or do they want to pursue the bankruptcy
option?

Angelides: "A buyout, not a bailout makes sense." because it "would give
liquidity to the utilities."

Angelides: Announced he was assembling full financing team which would be in
place by Friday.

Angelides: Also said that before bonds could be issued, interim steps needed
to be taken. Specifically -- that DWR and PUC must reach an agreement on
what rates must be paid on power contracts.

On the phone were: * Michael Kahn;  Laura Holson (sp?);  Debra Feinstone
(sp?) -- All three listened in and did not participate.

We will be faxing handouts and news releases of this and other news
conferences to the team. If you don't receive them, please contact Kristin
Anderson at 916/442-2331 to request a fax.

PS - The Connell news conference has been postponed.

-----Original Message-----
From: Beiser, Megan
To: 'nplotkin@tfglobby.com'; Aaron Thomas (E-mail) (E-mail); Andrea Weller
(E-mail) (E-mail); andrew Chau (E-mail) (E-mail); Bill Chen (E-mail)
(E-mail); Douglas Oglesby (E-mail) (E-mail); Fairchild, Tracy; Jeffrey
Hanson (E-mail) (E-mail); jennifer Chamberlin (E-mail) (E-mail); john
Barthrop (E-mail) (E-mail); John Leslie (E-mail) (E-mail); Joseph Alamo
(E-mail) (E-mail); 'Michael Nelson' (E-mail); Mona Petrochka (E-mail); Peter
Bray (E-mail) (E-mail); Rebecca Schlanert (E-mail) (E-mail); Richard
Counihan (E-mail) (E-mail); 'Robert Morgan' (E-mail); Sue Mara (E-mail)
(E-mail)
Cc: Allen, Stevan; Warner, Jami; Manuel, Erica; Fairchild, Tracy; Anderson,
Kristin
Sent: 2/8/01 11:40 AM
Subject: Several Press Briefings in Sacramento today

AReM-ers,

It's a busy day today for press briefings as you can see from the
schedule below.  We'll be covering these events this morning and will
get news releases, press materials from all as well.

We will provide updates as soon as possible and get them out to you.

*********************

9 a.m., SACRAMENTO _ State Treasurer Phil Angelides
holds
media briefing to discuss issuance of energy-related bonds, 915 Capitol
Mall, room 110. Contact: Colleen Beamish, 916-653-4052.

9:30 a.m., SACRAMENTO _ Assembly Speaker Robert Hertzberg and others
discuss legislation to promote energy conservation and increase power
supplies, Capitol, room 317. Contact: Paul Hefner, 916-319-2408.

11:30 a.m., YUBA CITY _ Gov. Gray Davis discusses his plans to increase
electricity generating capacity in California, Sutter power plant
project,
5087-A South Township Rd. Contact: 916-445-4571.

Noon, SACRAMENTO _ Republican lawmakers hold news conference to discuss
failure of parent companies to keep their utility subsidiaries
sufficiently
solvent to serve the public interest, Capitol, room 1190. Contact: Wade
Teasdale, 916-445-3731.


On Thursday, September 27th the ISO conducted a conference call to discuss the
status of the launch of their Inter-SC software upgrade.  During the call
several  SCs requested an extension of the market simulation to include the
week
of October 2nd.   The PX will in turn extend our market simulation for the
entire week of October 2nd using the following schedule:

(See attached file: Stage 6.7 Extended Mkt Sim Schedule.doc)

The ISO has scheduled a follow-up call on Wednesday, October 4th to discuss
the
readiness of their software and to determine a comfort level from its
customers
regarding a launch date for the software upgrade.   Currently the ISO is
working
toward a launch the week of October 23rd.

 We will provide an update after Wednesday's call.

We will NOT have a PX call on Wednesday, calls will resume on Thursday,
October
5th.

Thank you.

 - Stage 6.7 Extended Mkt Sim Schedule.doc


works for me.
PL


I have asked Dave to set up a meeting with you and Barbara on this subject.  I thought there were exclusions relative to EOL transactions and points that do not directly impact HPL.  The problem for me is that if I want to do terms deals in these locations now I want to be able to keep them as ENA and not transfer them with the HPL sale.  Let's talk as soon as possible so I can have clear understanding of the rules of engagement for ENA now and after the close.

Thanks,

Tom


9:30 would be better for me, but I can be available at 9:00 or a little after.

Lysa Akin
12/11/2000 05:43 PM
To: Leslie Lawner/HOU/EES@EES, Rebecca W Cantrell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron, Roy Boston/HOU/EES@EES, Steve Montovano/DUB/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Conference Call re: Gas Curtailment and Diversion Paper

Please advise ASAP your availability for a call regarding the above
referenced topic on Wednesday, December 13th at
7:00 am Pacific / 9:00am Central / 10:00am Eastern

Lysa Akin
Enron Corp.
Sr. Admin. Ass't. - Gov't Affairs
121 SW Salmon, 3WTC0306
Portland, OR  97204
Office (503) 464-7927
Fax (503) 464-3740
lysa.akin@enron.com


Sam,

We can use a piece written by Rakesh on liquidity.

I shall ask him to send  it to you.

Vince

-----Original Message-----
From: Smith, William
Sent: Monday, July 02, 2001 8:51 AM
To: Kaminski, Vince J
Subject: Technical Corner for today

Good Morning, Vince!

I spoke with Iris last week about something she had submitted to you.  It's about the various models that we've created in the department.  She said that it goes into details we may not want to publicize, but that it might be adaptable for the newsletter.  There's an introductory section, a models section, and recommendations for the future.  I would suggest that we run the introduction, amend the models section to eliminate anything we don't want to say, and omit the final portion.

If you are agreeable, I can use all or part of the introduction in today's issue and split up the rest.  It would give us a breather while others are finishing their submissions.

What do you think?

Sam


Vlady,

Here is the P&L breakout you requested.  If you have any questions give me a
call.

Robin
x57478


Shirley,

Here it comes.

Vince

Shirley Crenshaw
01/04/2001 02:22 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: 1ST CHAPTER OF TRAINING BOOK

Vince:

Several of the guys are asking for this chapter so they can read it.  Do you
have it electronically or hard copy.  I will be glad to send.  Please let me
know.

Thanks!

Shirley


Please put jennifer burns on the distribution list.
Jennifer, please print out, and put in my weekly packet you put together
every morn.  Also please print this one out.

Thanks.   Jeff

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Peter Berzins @ ENRON                           11/27/2000 08:52 AM

To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Torrey Moorer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leonardo Pacheco/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jennifer
deBoisblanc Denny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andy Zipper/Corp/Enron@Enron, David
Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron, Matt Motsinger/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Global Products for the Week of 11-20-2000 through 11-22-2000

Attached is your requested listing of Global Products which have been offered
during the past week. This listing includes every global product which was
activated on the web during the last trading week, regardless of whether or
not it was actually traded.

Thanks!

Pete Berzins


fyi.

-----Original Message-----
From: navigator@nisource.com [mailto:navigator@nisource.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 9:43 AM
To: navigator@nisource.com
Subject: Critical,OTHER,20010119,COLUMBIA GULF,007854581,Gas Quality
Specifications - REMINDER

                       COLUMBIA GULF TRANSMISSION COMPANY
                        NOTICE TO ALL INTERESTED PARTIES
                                DECEMBER 20, 2001

Re:  Gas Quality Specifications - REMINDER
Notice ID: 2435
5 - NO RESPONSE REQUIRED

REMINDER - The notice posted below is still in effect at least until the end of
January 2002.

                 COLUMBIA GULF TRANSMISSION COMPANY
                  NOTICE TO ALL INTERESTED PARTIES
                        JANUARY 19, 2001

SUBJECT:  NOTICE TO PARTIES DELIVERING OR CAUSING GAS TO BE DELIVERED TO
   COLUMBIA GULF TRANSMISSION COMPANY

Pursuant to Section 25.2(a) of Columbia's tariff, Columbia is providing notice
of the imposition of the following additional gas quality specification on all
shippers, interconnecting pipelines, producers, and receipt meter operators,
and all other parties delivering or causing gas to be delivered into Columbia's
system:

     All gas tendered under Columbia's tariff shall have a gross heating value
    of no more than 1050 Btu per cubic foot.

This additional gas quality specification will be imposed two (2) business days
after this notice is posted on Columbia's internet electronic bulletin board.

In addition to complying with this additional gas quality specification, all
parties delivering or causing gas to be delivered into the Columbia-operated
Blue Water system on the Western Shoreline, the Southwestern Extension, or on
the Header (west of the system null point) may be required to provide evidence
to Columbia that such gas is being processed at the Blue Water Processing Plant
to ensure that the composite gas stream at Egan, Louisiana has a gross heating
value of 1050 Btu or less.  Evidence of the gas processing agreements may be
required upon Columbia's request.

Failure of a party to comply with the additional gas quality specification set
forth above and to provide Columbia Gulf with evidence, upon request, of a gas
processing agreement for gas delivered to the Blue Water system will result in
Columbia Gulf refusing to accept gas from such party and to make corresponding
redeliveries.

Imposition of this additional gas quality specification does not relieve any
party delivering gas or causing gas to be delivered to Columbia's system from
its existing obligations to comply with the gas quality specifications set
forth in Section 25.1 of Columbia's tariff, to ensure the merchantability of
the gas, and to ensure that gas has been properly processed before entering
Columbia's system.

Columbia, pursuant to the terms of Section 25.2(a) of its tariff, is imposing
this additional gas quality specification as it has determined, in its
reasonable judgment, that harm to its pipeline system and its operations may
occur if it receives gas on its system that fails to meet this additional gas
quality specification.  Columbia reserves the right to revise this additional
gas quality specification upon further analysis of the gas that is being
received by Columbia and reevaluation of the potential harm to Columbia's
pipeline system and its operations.

You are further placed on notice that Columbia will hold you responsible and
seek legal redress for any damages it incurs as a result of the higher Btu
gas.

Any questions about this notice may be directed to Gary Espey, (713) 267-4761,
or to John Pillion, (713) 267-4764.


This Friday - Michael goes for a visit at  St. Francis, which may be his new
school (so far, so good).  I'll be in around1000

Most Fridays I'm going to TRY to pick Michael up since I'm away so much,
which means leaving by 445 or so.

October 4, ENA orientation in the am.

October 19/20, Neil is out of town, so I have to pick Michael up from school
(leave at 430)

October 26/27, hope to be vacation time.  Neil has a meeting in San Antonio
(usually it is in Miami, San Francisco, Phoenix - not so great this year).
It is the officer's meeting for Enterprise, and spouses are invited.  This
means we won't be in town for the Compaq thing. Figures, of course.  Thanks
for asking.

I'm watching for some good vacation days, also...


please print
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 10/18/2000
09:00 AM ---------------------------

Mark Tawney
10/17/2000 06:55 PM
To: Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Weather Announcement


Please find below the latest e-mail that I had sent to Mike, which outlines
my proposed trip to London.  Upon your approval, I plan on going to London on
February 3rd, which would coincide with Joel Heneberg's trip.  I am also
planning on sitting in on some of his Commodity Logic Meetings, since Global
Rates will be an integral part of some of these meetings.

If you have questions, please feel free to give me a call @ x36674

.
---------------------- Forwarded by Steve Venturatos/HOU/ECT on 01/22/2001
02:15 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Steve Venturatos                           01/18/2001 11:14 AM

To: Mike Jordan/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: James Scribner/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Global Rates

I thought I would share with you my ideas in regard to my upcoming trip to
London.

I would like to meet with you and James New for about an hour when I first
arrive to get a feel of your businesses and to give both of you an update on
the new and improved Global Rates Group, after the partial implementation of
MKM.   I would also appreciate it, if I could unobtrusively sit with several
of your risk groups, in order to among other things, get an idea of the types
of commodities London trades and their respective Exchanges.  This would
allow to familiarize myself with the current process that London uses to
capture commodity rates.

After a couple of days in your shop, I am confident that I could come back to
Houston with a much better idea of how Global Rates could be of the most
benefit to London.

This trip would of course be charged to the Global Rates CC and not allocated
back to London, since it is a "discovery"  trip, which we have budgeted for
in our 2001 budget.

I wouldn't want this to interfere in anyway with your ongoing business,
therefore would you please let me know when you and James would be in London
during the next couple of  weeks and I will schedule my trip accordingly.

Thanks again for your assistance, it is unfortunate that our teleconference
scheduled for today got cancelled.


The 4th looks good for now

	"John W. Odam" <johnodam@goforthlewis.com>
	03/07/2001 06:37 PM

		 To: "Richard B. Sanders" <Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Lunch -- John Odam, Dan Goforth and Ted Weise

Richard:? How bout April 4 or 5?? You,  plus whoever else that we discussed
who might be available.? Y'all are our  guests of course.? John Odam


I've left the Electricities lawyer a voice mail.

Lisa Mellencamp@ECT
07/11/2000 10:37 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Land Option Agreement with Electricities

can you do this?

Lisa J. Mellencamp
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith St.
Houston, TX  77002
Tel:  (713) 853-7986
Fax: (713) 646-3393
----- Forwarded by Lisa Mellencamp/HOU/ECT on 07/11/2000 10:36 AM -----

	Jeffrey M Keenan
	07/11/2000 10:33 AM

		 To: Lisa Mellencamp/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Land Option Agreement with Electricities

Lisa:

Ken Raber (electricities) and I discussed the option agreement yesterday and
came to the conclusion that any issues electricities has with the option
agreement will go to you directly.  I believe that will streamline the
process.

The attorney's name is Mike Colo and his telephone number is 252-972-7105.

I would really like to get this option agreement signed as soon as we can and
I'm sure you feel the same!

If there is anything I can do let me know.

Jeffrey


Bill,

In light of the response below, let's change gears.  In lieu of preparing the
three scenarios previously requested, what we would like to do at the 12:30
pm PSTconference call, in addition to a general discussion of the results of
your original analysis,  we would like you to modify the study with regard to
the following 3 issues; 1) Assume that SB47X is not implemented, 2) Utilize a
9% discount rate, and 3) Assume a dry season as most likely case.  It is our
hope that you will be able to complete that analysis in time for the call.
Please express the results in terms of cents/kwh and percentage increase over
existing commercial/industrial rates.

Thanks.  Look forward to speaking with you later.

Robert

	"Bill Monsen" <wam@mrwassoc.com>
	03/06/2001 10:31 PM

		 To: Robert.Neustaedter@enron.com
		 cc: ryy@mrwassoc.com, rbw@mrwassoc.com
		 Subject: Re: California Rate Assessment (371.35)

Robert,

Thanks for the note. A conference call at 12:30 pm PST would work for us.
However, on that call, we will not be able to present results of the
additional scenarios that you defined in your e-mail. The model that we
used was an annual rate model. The analysis that you are proposing would
require a monthly model, which would take additional time to develop.
Perhaps we should discuss this prior to the call at 2:30 pm CST. Roger and
I will give you a call when we get into the office on Wednesday morning.
This should be around 11 am CST.

Best regards,

Bill

At 05:32 PM 3/6/01 , Robert.Neustaedter@enron.com wrote:
>Bill and Roger,
>
>Thanks for the quick turn-around on the analysis.  I hope the weekend was
>not totally ruined.  After review of the study, we thought it would be
>useful to further expand the scenarios into a Worst, Base and Best Case.
>The scenarios we would like you to run are outlined in the attached file.
>Each scenario would reflect a wet, dry and normal weather case.
>Please note that each scenario has a different date for surcharge
>implementation.  The Best Case reflects the date included in your original
>analysis.  Along those lines, would you please expand on the rationale for
>assuming the 1/01/02 implementation date.
>
>In addition to reflecting the rate impact on a cents per kwh basis, please
>include a percent impact as well.
>
>Like our original request, we are on a fast-track.  We would like to
>schedule a conference call for 2:30 p.m. central time Wednesday (March 7)
>to discuss the results of your analysis.  Hopefully, the data you have
>already generated can be quickly "massaged" to accomodate the scenarios
>requested.
>
>Please call me at 713 853 3170 if you have any questions.
>
>Robert
>
>(See attached file: California Rate Scenarios.doc)


IntercontinentalExchange
                                                                                Firm Physical Natural Gas Price Bulletin
                                                                                For Natural Gas Delivered on Tuesday, October   30, 2001
                                                                                (Trade Date of Monday, October   29, 2001)
Click here to access index history .
                                                                                * volume represents sell-side only *

Region     Hub	High	Low	Wtd Avg Index	Change ($)	Vol (mmBtu)	Hub Name
 LOUISIANA
    ANR SE	          $3.1700	          $3.1100	          $3.1464	+    .1325	         264,500	American Natural Resources Pipeline Co. - SE  Transmission Pool
    Columbia Onshore	          $3.2700	          $3.1750	          $3.2035	+    .1505	         312,900	Columbia Gulf Transmission Co. - Onshore Pool
    Henry Hub	          $3.2500	          $3.1500	          $3.2044	+    .1566	       1,626,800	Henry Hub tailgate - Louisiana
    NGPL LA	          $3.1800	          $3.1000	          $3.1354	+    .1406	         221,100	Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America, Louisiana Pool
    Tenn 500L	          $3.2650	          $3.1600	          $3.1942	+    .1512	         188,400	Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co.-Zone L, 500 Leg Pool
    Tenn 800L	          $3.2350	          $2.2650	          $3.1672	+    .1447	         118,400	Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co.-Zone L, 800 Leg Pool
    TETCO ELA	          $3.2100	          $3.1450	          $3.1778	+    .1284	         161,000	Texas Eastern - East LA
    TETCO WLA	          $3.1900	          $3.1400	          $3.1620	+    .1376	          40,000	Texas Eastern - West LA
    Transco 65	          $3.2450	          $3.1700	          $3.2154	+    .1204	         131,000	Transco - Station 65
    Trunkline ELA	          $3.2000	          $3.1200	          $3.1622	+    .1498	          65,700	Trunkline Gas Company - East Louisiana Pool
    TxGas SL	          $3.2200	          $3.1550	          $3.1913	+    .1641	         131,000	Texas Gas Transmission Corp.-Zone SL FT Pool
 MIDCONTINENT
    MichCon, citygate	          $3.3900	          $3.3000	          $3.3552	+    .1372	         184,200	Michigan Consolidated
    NGPL Midcont	          $3.1000	          $2.9900	          $3.0381	+    .1611	         179,300	Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America, Mid-Continent Pool
    NGPL Nicor, citygate	          $3.2900	          $3.1900	          $3.2318	+    .0987	         311,700	Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America, Nicor Citygate
    NGPL NIPSCO, citygate	          $3.2700	          $3.2000	          $3.2372	+    .1102	          58,000	Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America, Nipsco Citygate
    NNG Demarcation	          $3.1200	          $3.0900	          $3.1032	+    .1324	         200,200	Northern Natural Gas, Demarcation Pool
 NORTHEAST
    Columbia TCO	          $3.6500	          $3.5000	          $3.5946	+    .1931	         368,200	Columbia Gas Co. - TCO Pool
    Dominion So.Point	          $3.6100	          $3.4950	          $3.5580	+    .1519	         340,000	Dominion - South Point
    TETCO M3	          $3.6800	          $3.6250	          $3.6513	+    .2235	         247,600	Texas Eastern - M3 Zone
    Transco Z-6 (NY)	          $3.8850	          $3.6800	          $3.7837	+    .2175	         230,800	Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp. - Zone 6 (NY)
 WEST
    El Paso non-Bondad	          $2.8900	          $2.8400	          $2.8641	+    .3291	         160,000	El Paso - San Juan Basin, Blanco Pool
    Huntingdon/Sumas	          $2.8900	          $2.8000	          $2.8305	+    .2305	         178,600	Westcoast Energy & Northwest Pipeline Corp.
    Opal	          $2.7300	          $2.6300	          $2.6982	+    .2636	          76,500	Opal
    PG?Citygate	          $3.2900	          $3.1000	          $3.2117	+    .4595	         190,000	PG?- Citygate
    SoCal Border	          $3.1100	          $2.9800	          $3.0843	+    .2537	         123,000	Southern California Border Points (Ehrenberg,Topock,Needles)
 WEST TEXAS
    El Paso - Keystone	          $2.9450	          $2.8500	          $2.9143	+    .1985	         206,100	El Paso - Keystone Pool
    Waha	          $3.0300	          $2.9400	          $2.9919	+    .1895	         195,000	Waha Hub - West Texas

                                                                                Includes all firm physical fixed price trades done from 7 AM to 11:30 AM Central Prevailing Time on the trade date specified for natural gas delivered on the specified date(s).
                                                                                IntercontinentalExchange is the world's most liquid trading platform for over-the-counter energy and metals.  Active markets include North American power and natural gas, global crude and refined oil products, and precious metals.  Traded instruments include forwards, swaps, and options.
In order to receive the proprietary information contained in this email, you acknowledge and agree that you shall not further disseminate the IntercontinentalExchange Market Data contained herein to any person or entity without the express written consent of IntercontinentalExchange.    Furthermore, you acknowledge that (1) IntercontinentalExchange has exclusive and valuable property rights in this data; (2) IntercontinentalExchange's data is being made available to you only for your own business or personal activities; and (3) you cannot communicate the data, in any form, to any other person or entity without the express written consent of IntercontinentalExchange.
This data is provided to you free of charge.  IntercontinentalExchange reserves the right to cancel this service at any time for any reason or no reason at all.
You agree that IntercontinentalExchange does not make any representations or warranties, express or implied, with respect to the data.
To become an Exchange Participant or inquire about the indices, please contact sales@intcx.com .
To unsubscribe from this service, click here unsubscribe .
                                                                                ?Copyright IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. 2001, All Rights Reserved.


---------------------- Forwarded by Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES on 10/09/2000
09:44 AM ---------------------------

Mona L Petrochko
10/09/2000 09:33 AM
To: jdasovic@.enron.com, Paul Kaufman
cc:
Subject: Edits on Strategy

Sent it on Friday, don't know what happened.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES on 10/09/2000
09:28 AM ---------------------------

Mona L Petrochko
10/06/2000 07:23 AM
To: West GA
cc: Lysa Akin@Enron
Subject: Edits on Strategy

Did them last night, but didn't send.  Here they are.


Thank you everyone for my gift card to Foley's.  I will definelty have fun
using that.  You are all a great bunch to work for.

Thanks again!

Ina


Your access to the financial trading agreement database is approved.  The
icon is attached below.  Why don't you take a look and see if you've got edit
capability to the database.

Link -->
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 03/21/2001 12:36 PM -----

	ARSystem <ARSystem@mailman.enron.com>
	03/21/2001 12:29 PM

		 To: "tana.jones@enron.com" <tana.jones@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Request Closed: Access Request for linda.sietzema@enron.com

The request has been completed with all resources requested either completed
or rejected. You can view the details of the  request by clicking
http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000024615&Page=
MyReq.


2.  I believe SWPC further agreed that the assignment to the LLCs (and the
subsequent transfer of equity) will not affect the terms of the contracts,
including the warranties.

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Mitch Robinson                           12/05/2000 06:38 PM

To: Don Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Stuart Zisman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: SWPC Transfer

Don -

Please forward on to Allegheny.

In order to facilitate the smooth transfer of the assets, to close out the
turbine purchase contracts, and to provide Allegheny with unused generation
capability at Gleason, we are entering into an agreement with Siemens
Westinghouse Power Corp ("SWPC") which will effect the Gleason and Wheatland
facilities in the following way.

1.  Increase the permissible power level at Gleason on each of the turbines
from 182mw to 185mw.  Specifically, SWPC will allow the three Gleason units
to each have a maximum operating capability of 185,000kw and will reset the
control curves accordingly.  SWPC further will agree that operation of the
Gleason units up to and including 185,000 kw is within normal operating
parameters and operation up to and including this level will not invalidate
the warranty.  SWPC has agreed to make this change within one week after we
give them authorization.

2.  SWPC agrees that the Gleason and Wheatland contracts and associated
warranties may be assigned to limited liability companies owned in whole or
in part by an Enron entity pursuant to the terms and conditions of the
Gleason and Wheatland contracts, and that SWPC's consent to such assignments
will not be unreasonably withheld.  SWPC will honor warranty claims currently
outstanding or asserted in the future by the contract assignee, assuming such
assignment is in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Gleason and
Wheatland contracts.

3.  SWPC agrees to assist Enron in providing technical information, including
redacted copies of the purchase contracts, applicable technical bulletins,
etc. to Allegheny.  This information will be limited to information which is
currently available to Enron and of a technical nature only.

I believe all of these features are significantly beneficial to Allegheny.
Please ask Allegheny for feedback, as we will be entering into the agreement
by the end of the week.

Regards,

Mitch Robinson


----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 10/11/2000 09:29 AM -----

	"Fergus, Gary S." <GFergus@brobeck.com>
	10/06/2000 04:58 PM

		 To: "'Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com'" <Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com>,
"'msmith1@enron.com'" <msmith1@enron.com>, "'David_Aamodt@pgn.com'"
<David_Aamodt@pgn.com>, "'MBD'" <MDay@GMSSR.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: Enron Proposals Regarding Document Subpoenas

Here is your copy of the final version sent to the Commission.
Thanks
Gary

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fergus, Gary S.
> Sent: Friday, October 06, 2000 2:57 PM
> To: 'hym@cpuc.ca.gov'
> Cc: 'MBD'
> Subject: Enron Proposals Regarding Document Subpoenas
> Importance: High
>
> Harvey Morris Esq.
> California Public Utilities Commission
> 505 Public Utilities Commission
> San Francisco, California   94102
>
>  Re:   I.00-08-002  Subpoenas Served on Enron Power Marketing, Inc.
> ("EPMI"), Enron Energy Services Operations Inc. and Enron Energy Services
> Inc. (collectively referred to as "EES"), Enron Energy Marketing
> Corporation ("EEMC"), and Portland General Electric Corporation ("Portland
> General")(collectively sometimes referred to as the "Enron Entities")
>
> Harvey,
>
>  Here are our proposals with respect to the Enron Entities'
> production of documents pursuant to the above described subpoenas issued
> by the California Public Utility Commission (hereinafter "the
> Commission").  The Enron Entities are willing to assist the Commission in
> undertaking its investigation into the problems in the California electric
> markets by producing the information specified on a timely basis.  We
> believe that the production we propose will enable the Commission to
> commence its investigation much sooner than if the parties were forced to
> litigate all of the potential objections to the requests for production,
> which are, by any standard, extremely broad and could involve millions of
> pages of documents.  We make these proposals pursuant to our email
> exchange of October 3, 2000 with the understanding that the Commission
> agrees that by cooperating, offering to produce or producing documents,
> the Enron Entities have not waived any objections or challenges to these
> subpoenas whatsoever and that any claims, defenses, objections,
> jurisdictional or otherwise or other responses have been specifically
> reserved and can be raised in the future, if necessary.   For all of these
> proposals, we exclude documents that are protected from disclosure by the
> attorney client and attorney work product privileges.
>
>  Generally speaking, the Enron Entities propose to produce documents
> for year 2000 as noted below.  We also understand that the Commission will
> be obtaining documents from the ISO and PX and we will not attempt here to
> duplicate documents that we understand will be produced by those entities.
> As you will see in the general documents that are offered here for
> production, Enron Energy Services Operations, Inc. is the parent of Enron
> Energy Services, Inc. and does not have operating authority or engage in
> wholesale or retail purchases or sales of energy.  Thus, the documents
> offered here with respect to those two entities originates with Enron
> Energy Services, Inc. but we have designated them both as EES.  We also do
> not propose to offer duplicative documents as between the Enron Entities.
>
> GENERAL DOCUMENTS
> Requests 1 through 4
>
>  Because of the dynamic nature of the Enron Entities' businesses, the
> burden and expense on them to locate, and produce every corporate
> organizational chart anywhere in their organizations since April 1, 1998
> is significant.   The Enron Entities will provide the Commission with
> exemplars of their current organizational charts, telephone directories
> and so called "family trees" to show its current organization.  To the
> extent that the Enron Entities can readily identify and locate exemplars
> of significant organizational charts, telephone directories or so called
> "family trees" for earlier periods they will also make those available.
> One Enron Entity, Portland General, has published books on its corporate
> history.  If a list of those books would be helpful, we can provide it.
> With respect to the other Enron Entities, to the extent that corporate
> histories can be found, they will be produced.  We anticipate producing
> these documents in the first wave on October 13, 2000.
>
> Requests 5 and 6
>
>  The Enron Entities propose that their responses to Requests 1-4 will
> identify their relationship to affiliated companies and the Transaction
> Documents will identify its customers and suppliers.  We believe this
> information will be sufficient to illustrate these relationships for the
> staff's purposes.
>
> FINANCIAL DOCUMENTS
> Requests 7 through 11
>
>  The Enron Entities will produce their public filings for the period
> requested with respect to financial data.  EPMI, EES, and Portland General
> will provide to the Commission electronic transaction data ( the
> "Transaction Documents") for the purchase and sale of energy delivered
> which information includes economic data.   We anticipate producing public
> filings regarding financial data on October 13, 2000 and the electronic
> Transaction Documents in the second wave of document productions.
>
> GENERATING DOCUMENTS
> Requests 12, 14 and 18
>
>  For the Enron Entities other than Portland General, the generation
> facilities are either non-existent or limited in number and there will
> probably be limited documents available.  The Enron Entities to the extent
> they act as a scheduling coordinator or possessed the right to use or
> resell generation output, do not have the specific documents that pertain
> to each generation unit requested.  The Enron Entities, other than
> Portland General, do have documents and information for Las Vegas
> Cogeneration.  We propose to produce these documents in the second wave of
> document productions.
>
>   For Portland General, the production of the requested documents
> would involve a tremendous volume of documents, as Portland General owned
> twenty generating facilities of a variety of types and sizes during 2000.
> Portland General is a net importer of energy and can only generate about
> one half of its total energy demand.  As a result, we question whether the
> effort required of Portland General is warranted as its impact on the
> California wholesale market is necessarily limited.  Nevertheless,
> Portland General proposes to provide for year 2000 electronic Transaction
> Documents in summary form similar to the data being provided by other
> Enron Entities, to the extent relevant as discussed below.  We propose
> that the Commission defer requesting production of other information until
> it has reviewed the information of generators who sell a significant
> proportion of their energy into the California market.  At that time a
> more accurate assessment can be made of whether this enormous effort will
> be valuable given the limited impact of Portland General generation on the
> California wholesale market.
>
> TRANSACTION DOCUMENTS
> Requests 13, 15, 16, 17 and 19
>
>  We understand that the Commission will be obtaining trading data for
> the purchase and sale of energy delivered in California from the ISO and
> PX.  EPMI can provide the Commission several different sets of relevant
> transaction data for year 2000 (in California and outside of California
> and Real Time) for the purchase and sale of energy delivered with the
> date, counterparty, quantity, delivery point, hours, price, and whether it
> is a purchase or a sale.   Because of the speed with which you want this
> information, it is possible that some entries will be incomplete or
> inaccurate.  For those
> transactions where EPMI served only as the scheduling coordinator, we
> understand that the ISO will show part of the transaction, but there will
> not be a corresponding transaction in the EPMI data we can provide
> quickly.  The reason is that this type of transaction is passed through to
> EPMI's customer on an accounting system rather than as part of the trading
> business.  EES can also provide similar data with respect to relevant
> wholesale and retail transactions with the proviso that with respect to
> retail transactions it will not include the specific names of its retail
> customers but instead will provide a blind customer number due to EES'
> confidentiality obligations to those customers.  We anticipate producing
> the Transaction Documents in the second wave of document productions.
>
> FERC DOCUMENTS
>
> Request 20
>
>  The Enron Entities will produce the requests for data they received
> from FERC and to the extent that FERC has been given responses, copies of
> those responses.  We anticipate producing the FERC documents on October
> 13, 2000.
>
>
>  Based upon discussions that we have had with the various Enron
> Entities, we believe that we could make a second wave of productions on
> Friday October 27, 2000.  It is possible that not all Enron Entities could
> make that date but we believe the bulk of the data could be available for
> production by then.
>
>  We propose to make these productions with the understanding that if
> any entity obtains a more stringent protective order than the one
> currently in place, that all of the Enron Entities document productions
> will be protected by the most stringent protective order.  In addition,
> if, at the request of any party or nonparty to this proceeding, the
> Commission or a court of competent jurisdiction orders that the requests
> for production be limited, reduced or eliminated, the Enron Entities
> reserve the right to limit the production of documents in conformance with
> such order.
>
>  We understand that you will consider these proposals and let us know
> if they are acceptable to the Commission.  If you have any questions or
> comments about our proposal, please do not hesitate to contact Michael Day
> or myself.
>
> Brobeck Phleger & Harrison LLP
>
> Gary Fergus
>
>
>
>
>

=======================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of
the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to
postmaster@brobeck.com
BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP
http://www.brobeck.com


Any problems/comments?
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 10/13/2000 08:43
AM ---------------------------

Dale Rasmussen@ECT
10/12/2000 07:17 PM
To: Don Hammond/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jody Blackburn/PDX/ECT@ECT, Kay
Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kathleen Clark/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Ed Clark/PDX/ECT@ECT, Alan Larsen/PDX/ECT@ECT

Subject: Change Order #5--Pleasanton Transformer

A redraft of Change Order #5 to the LM 6000 contract to provide for the
purchase of a GE transformer for the Pleasanton project is attached.

Please note that I have added some guaranty/LD provisions in Exhibit A, and
confirm whether these are appropriate in scope and amount.

We will attach the documents included here as separate files as Exhibits B
and C.  I understand that GE is to provide a more current copy of their
standard specifications for the transformer to be included in the Exhibits.

Kathleen:  Kay tells me that you are the keeper of change orders.
Congratulations!!  The discussion of current amount balances, etc. in the
attached are clearly wrong if we are up to CO#5--it was all based on this
being the third CO.  Can you please let me know what the right numbers should
be?

Thanks in advance for your input.  I understand there is some urgency with
getting this out.


To DO

1. Paper fro Kevin K.
2. Rosemary  at ICBI
Andy kalotay
Brad Horn
Johansen
Piazze


Hi Pete,

There's been a Plan B developed on the LV Co Gen project.  We are seriously
exploring the possibility of selling the current LV Co Gen turbines to a
third party, by selling the equity in a project co which acquires the
turbines.  Sound familiar?  Yes, it is CA Development III, only it is called
Salmon somethingorother llc.

I anticipate that the most recent version of the LV Co Gen contract will need
to be adapted to the CA form - no E Next Generation or ENA as agent.  I
believe Dale has been working on some tweaks to the form you last worked on
for LV Co Gen, and I assume these tweaks belong in the "new" Salmon
contract.  I will forward you the most current form that I've seen, and Dale
can protest if he thinks this is the wrong one to work with.  Carlos Sole  is
the lawyer in Houston who will be herding these cats.  His number is 713 345
8191.

I will be out of the office next week, but will periodically check my voice
mail if  you have any questions.

Thanks,

Kay


Gentlemen and Lady,

While I have enjoyed and leanred much from my experience at Enron, the time has come for me to move on to new endeavors.  Effective end of the day on Friday, December 21, 2001, I will be resigning from Enron.

I have decided to establish an independent consultancy firm, and I would hope we can work together again in the future.

For the remainder of this week until my resignation date,  I will continue to do my best to wrap-up loose ends and prepare the remaining staff of the Competitive Analysis business unit for possible resumption of business activities.

Sincerely,

Scott S. Tholan
December 17, 2001


See attached.

I will be on vacation next week.  Please contact Carol St Clair as needed in
my absence, but note that she works a 4 day week (out Friday).  Carol's
number is 853-3989.  The Canada Work Report will not be issued next week.

Cordially,
Mary Cook
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith, 38th Floor, Legal
Houston, Texas   77002-7361
(713) 345-7732 (phone)
(713) 646-3490 (fax)
mary.cook@enron.com


If the last Hoegh Galleon cargo of this year is diverted to Puerto Rico, the
economics of sending non-Cabot LNG to Puerto Rico are different than those
mentioned in my prior note.

Based on current prices, there is $0.7 MM of value that could be captured
between Enron LNG and Eco on the diversion. This represents the price
difference between what it would cost to buy back our sale to ENA at CMS and
what Eco would have had to pay Cabot for a Winter Cargo. If CMS would let us
out of the terminal fee or let it apply to a future delivery, that would add
an additional $1 MM of value. If Cabot had to give up its Demand Charge and
Demand Surcharge (hard to imagine) on the Winter Cargo, that adds another
$4.7 MM.

A second Hoegh Galleon cargo should add $1.5 MM but would need to be sourced
from Nigeria or Algeria(???).

Cabot controls the date of the Last Cargo delivered in 2001. It can be
November 23-December 15 (unless another date is mutually agreeable). The date
of this last delivery determines the earliest date that Eco would be able to
receive the Hoegh Galleon. The earliest that Eco could receive the Hoegh
Galleon should therefore be between December 20 and January 11 - depends on
Cabot.

Eco would be able to receive a second Hoegh Galleon cargo as soon as 29 days
after the first Hoegh Galleon cargo delivery or as late as 45 days after. Two
Hoegh Galleon cargoes should give Eco enough fuel (barely) to get them to the
dates where they are eligible to receive the Early Spring cargo (100 days
after the Last Cargo of 2001).

In addition to the $$$'s available to be captured, this program removes Eco's
risk of not receiving a Winter Cargo from Cabot.

Economics and Timing -  The amount of value to be captured is most heavily
influenced by December-January NYMEX prices. These impact our cost to buy
back gas at the CMS tailgate and our cost to buy the second Hoegh Galleon
cargo. Our gas cost is more subject to change than is the Cabot contract
price we are trying to beat. If we had a crystal ball, we would lock-in the
economics of the diversion and of the purchase of the second cargo when the
NYMEX bottoms-out. The front of the price curve has lost ~$1.00/MMBtu in the
last 2 weeks. Where will it go from here?

In order to be prepared to execute when market conditions are right, we need
to get Eco on board and initiate discussions with a producer about supply for
the second cargo. Also, we should talk with Gene Massey to confirm that the
contract says what we think it says and to get his thoughts on what we are
trying to do.

I would appreciate any insights that you may have regarding this opportunity.

Regards,

Paul


I need a legal opinion.  What is a non-purchase order?

---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/05/2001 12:09
PM ---------------------------

	From:  George Wasaff, Global Strategic Sourcing
04/05/2001 11:52 AM

Sent by: Enron Announcements
To: All Enron Employees United States
cc:

Subject: Action Requested: New iBuyit Order Procedures

This Information Applies ONLY to Organizations Supported by Houston-based
Accounts Payable Processing Centers

Earlier this week I was pleased to announce that Enron's new procurement and
payment tool, iBuyit eProcurement, is now live for those who previously
requested IT hardware from IT Central.  But there is still more to come! On
May 1st the iBuyit Payables system will be activated for all organizations
supported by Houston-based Accounts Payable processing centers.  The new
iBuyit Payables system will increase the efficiency of the accounts payable
process by capturing invoices as scanned images at a central point of receipt
and routing them electronically for coding, payment authorization, and issue
resolution.

In preparation for this transition, there are some simple changes to the way
you currently order and pay for goods and services.  Following these changes
will ensure that your invoice is correctly processed through the iBuyit
Payables system.

Effective immediately, provide vendors with the following information when
placing an order and instruct them to reference this information:
*  Company Number or Legal Entity Name
*  Contact Name
*  Personal External Identification Number (EID) or Approved Purchase Order
Number
*  New P.O. Box  (See Below)

What is an EID?
An EID is your External Identification Number (EID). This EID number
identifies the purchaser and helps route non-purchase order invoices back to
the purchaser electronically through iBuyit.

Do I need to use an EID for non-purchase orders?
Yes.  When ordering goods and services with a non-purchase order, the
purchaser should provide the vendor with the appropriate EID.  It is your
responsibility to communicate to vendors that an EID is now required for
non-purchase orders.

Do I need to use an EID for purchase orders?
No.  When ordering goods and services with an approved purchase order, you
should provide the vendor with a purchase order number as you currently do.

What if I do not know my EID?
All Enron employees are assigned an EID number. If you purchase goods and
services on behalf of Enron, you need to know your personal EID number.  You
can access your EID number in eHRonline.  Logon to eHRonline, choose
&Personal Information8 to pull up your personal profile.  On the left side of
the &Personal Information8 screen select &Other8 and you will see your:
*  PID (SAP ID)
*  GIS ID
*  EID

What is our new mailing address (PO Box)?
Effective immediately, instruct the vendor to mail the invoices to the
following address:
PO Box 4734
Houston, TX  77210-4734

What do I do if an invoice comes directly to me?
HOUSTON LOCATIONS ONLY
If an invoice comes directly to you, mark the envelope &Attention Enron
Accounts Payable,8 and place the envelope in an AP drop box at any Enron mail
center.

FIELD LOCATIONS ONLY
If Houston currently processes your invoices, and an invoice comes directly
to you, they will continue to be processed by the Accounts Payable department
in Houston.  Please send invoices to the new PO Box above or the following
physical address:
3724 Dacoma
Houston, TX  77092
ATTENTION ENRON ACCOUNTS PAYABLE

Note:  ETS Field locations will continue to process non-purchase order
invoices locally.

How will vendors learn about these changes?
This information will be shared directly with vendors in a separate
communication.

Questions?  Send an e-mail to <mailto:ibuyit@enron.com>


Hey Jeff:

Welcome back from Mexico -- Todd's number is (503) 886-0391 -- talk to you
later.

Tracy J. McLaughlin
Enron Broadband Services
Government Affairs Coordinator
(503) 886-0396


You are invited to a meeting next Thursday (3/22) afternoon at 2:00 to
discuss energy commodity and renewable energy credits for the Enron Building,
Center and Stadium.  There are a few efforts that are going on simultaneously
and I thought it would be a good idea for all of us to meet and get on the
same page.  As many of you might know, Enron Wind (Michael Payne) and ENA
(Mike Curry) have a great proposal to retire renewable energy credits from
our Enron Wind facility to match the consumption of the building and stadium
(details attached below).  If this proposal goes forward, Enron would be the
1st Fortune 500 company to "go green" in its headquarters building.  Couple
this w/ our energy star award, and we have GREAT environmental messaging.
We'd like to highlight this announcement on Earth Day (April 22nd).

The facilities folks are interested in switching from Reliant to EES for
actual commodity.  It makes sense to work strategically together on win-win
proposal that will not only make sense economically, but that we can use in
our messaging.  The focus of the meeting is to discuss the various proposals,
and steps for moving forward.

The meeting will be in EB50MO3 from 2:00-3:00. Please let me know if you or
someone from your group can attend.

Stacey Bolton
Environmental Strategies
Enron Corp
3-9916


---------------------- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 12/16/99 10:49 AM
---------------------------

Molly Harris
12/16/99 10:46 AM
To: Molly Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amelia
Alland/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R
Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian
Hunter-Lindsay/LON/ECT@ECT, Ian Sloman/LON/ECT@ECT, Coenraad
Basson/LON/ECT@ECT, Bhautik Patel/LON/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, David
Weekes/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: EOL Credit Responses 12/15 - Revision

Please note a revised report from Credit for 12/15 is attached.  El Paso
Electric Co. was altered for Power.  This is the only revision from 12/15.

Regards
Molly

Molly Harris
12/15/99 05:46 PM
To: Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Bob Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amelia Alland/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S
Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian Hunter-Lindsay/LON/ECT@ECT, Ian
Sloman/LON/ECT@ECT, Coenraad Basson/LON/ECT@ECT, Bhautik Patel/LON/ECT@ECT,
David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, David Weekes/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: EOL Credit Responses 12/15

Please find attached Credit's EOL responses for 12/15.

Regards
Molly


Fabian:
Here are the answers to your questions.  Please give us a call if you have
any more questions. Thanks!
Ben


tell them to archive it
PL

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Brady, Edward
Sent:	Thursday, November 29, 2001 4:16 PM
To:	Love, Phillip M.
Subject:	FW: book archive

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Singla, Kimat
Sent:	Thursday, November 29, 2001 4:15 PM
To:	Brady, Edward
Subject:	FW: book archive

Ed, please take a look at this request and respond. Thanks.

Kimat

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Li, Shasha
Sent:	Thursday, November 29, 2001 3:57 PM
To:	Singla, Kimat
Cc:	Hernandez, Nancy
Subject:	book archive

Kimat,
We are working on the archived book list.   We found out that FT-NORTHEAST-GDL, FT-NORTHEAST-IDX and FT-NORTHEAST-PRC are inactive books.  Can you  please let us know if they can be moved to the archived book list?

Thank you
Shasha
Risk Control Group


Isn't it time for our ex-Bracewell lunch?
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 04/25/2000
12:10 PM ---------------------------

"Bill Gage" <gage@bkollp.com> on 04/24/2000 06:30:53 PM
To: "Richard Sanders" <richard.b.sanders@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Wasssssupppp

Sanders - Forgot to send you this earlier.?  Takes a while to download, but
it is worth the wait. -  Gage
 - waasszzu.mpeg


I'll give him a call.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mcquade, Jennifer
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 2:41 PM
To:	Lebrocq, Wendi; Jones, Tana
Subject:	Martin Gas Sales

Martin Gas Sales would like to pursue getting an ISDA in place so that they can trade financial LPGs on EnronOnline. Could someone please call Tom Redd at 903-983-1551 to start the process.

Thank you,
Jennifer McQuade


Kristin:

We are sending the Interview Request Form information to Molly Magee to
bring the following two candidates in for interviews:

Frank (Feng) Qian
Punit Rawal

We have no further interest in the following two candidates.  Do you handle
contacting them?

Heap-Ho Tan
Kyubaek Heo

Thanks!

Shirley


Jill,

I was wondering if I could get some information on the Costilla deal,
specifically the repurchase option.  I need to know the term, locations,
volume and strike price of the call.

Thanks,

Eric
x3-0977


_________________________________________________________________

            B R E A K F A S T   W I T H   T H E   F O O L
                    Tuesday, December 12, 2000

benjamin.rogers@enron.com
_________________________________________________________________

 Sponsored By: VirtualMoneyManager.com
 Save $200 until 12/31. Get a FREE subscription to market and
 equity analysis from top-rated Mastrapasqua & Associates.
 Serious research for the serious investor. Sign up today!
 http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=239419

"The shopping bag ladies -- it's hard to believe, but once they
were children." -- Dean Friedman

DOUBLECLICK'S DOUBLE TAKE
Online advertising powerhouse DoubleClick warns. Figures.

By Rick Aristotle Munarriz

It was simply a matter of when. DoubleClick (Nasdaq: DCLK),
along with fellow online marketers Engage (Nasdaq: ENGA) and
24/7 Media (Nasdaq: TFSM), had already announced layoffs over
the past few weeks. Clearly the once-hot Internet advertising
niche had run ice-cold. Pink slips and economic booms rarely go hand-in-hand.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=239420

So when DoubleClick set up a conference call yesterday after the
market's close, it didn't take much of a guess to know what the
company had to say. It wasn't even a matter of when anymore.
DoubleClick lowered projections for both the December and
January quarters.

Surprised? Not really. It's like pulling up to your house on
your birthday to find a dozen cars parked on your front lawn and
a chorus of hushes as you approach the door.

This surprise party might only startle the Rip Van Winkle who
had last checked DoubleClick's pulse after its September quarter
performance. The company had reported its first profit at the
time and expected similar bottom-line results this quarter. Now
fourth-quarter revenues are expected to come in between $126
million and $129 million -- well off the $140 million previously
projected. Earnings will be breakeven at best.

A wider loss than expected will follow in March. However,
DoubleClick still believes that 2001 will be a profitable year.

Surprised at the long-term stroke of optimism? You shouldn't be.
True, nearly half of DoubleClick's revenues come from dot-com
companies. In many cases, today's clients will line the
corporate obituaries tomorrow as they struggle with cash burn
rates in non-profitable enterprises that the market is no longer
interested in subsidizing. However, one can't deny the lure of
online marketing in the bricks-and-mortar world.

Internet usage is still growing by leaps and bounds. That is
something that can't be said of traditional advertising channels
such as print, television and billboards. The online medium also
provides a more effective way to target an ad recipient.
Probably even more important, in leaner economic times where ad
budgets need to be justified, the success of an Internet
marketing campaign can be effectively measured.

So, sure, these are dark times right now. But for investors
willing to turn the key and step inside, bright lights,
welcoming smiles, and wrapped gifts might be waiting on the
other side.
_________________________________________________________________

NEWS TO GO

Gamblers know to fold 'em when the chips are down. Well,
gamblers, the chips are down. Dallas Semiconductor (NYSE: DS),
Microchip Technology (Nasdaq: MCHP), and Advanced Micro Devices
(NYSE: AMD) reported that quarterly results will come in below
analyst estimates. The chipmakers are blaming a softness in
sales for the shortcoming.

The same can't be said for General Electric (NYSE: GE) and Sonic
(Nasdaq: SONC). Both companies reassured investors that earnings
are on track. GE is comfortable with the year ahead. The
burgermeisters at Sonic are comfortable with first-quarter
estimates despite a slowdown in traffic at the drive-in units.

According to this morning's Washington Post, struggling Internet
service provider PSINet (Nasdaq: PSIX) will be laying off 300
employees. Fittingly pronounced "sigh Net," the struggling
provider has seen its shares crash to under $2 from a high just
above $60 a share back in March. Growing revenues at the expense
of mounting losses just doesn't cut it nowadays.

Take a picture, it'll last longer. For the second time this
quarter, Eastman Kodak (NYSE: EK) has had to reduce profit
forecasts. The photography giant is now expecting full-year
profits to come in lower than the year before. Hoping to shred
the negatives, the company is embarking on a cost-cutting
crusade that will reduce capital spending, SKUs, and inventory
levels. No enlargements.
_________________________________________________________________

EDITORS' PICK

While the market's been in turmoil, it appears many have been
drinking Coors beverages. We've got some hard-core analysis of
the company's growing stock value.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=239421
_______________________________________________________________

-News & Commentary
 http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=239422

-Fool Community
 http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=239423

-Post of the Day
 http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=239424

-Latest Fribble
 http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=239425

-Latest Market Numbers
 http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=239426
____________________________________________________________

My Portfolio: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=239427
My Discussion Boards: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=239428
My Fool: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=239429
Fool.com Home: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=239430
My E-Mail Settings: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=239431

 Sponsored By: VirtualMoneyManager.com
 Save $200 until 12/31. Get a FREE subscription to market and
 equity analysis from top-rated Mastrapasqua & Associates.
 Serious research for the serious investor. Sign up today!
 http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=239432

GET A HEAD START ON 2001
      Start your investing research now with Industry
      Focus 2001. Available in electronic download or hard copy.
http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=239433

NEW! COMPLETE HOME FINANCE CENTER
      You can do it all here: get a mortgage, get an
      equity loan, or refinance
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=239434

FOOL DIRECT E-MAIL SERVICES
 Need to change your address or unsubscribe? You
 can also temporarily suspend mail delivery. Click here:
http://www.fool.com/community/freemail/freemaillogin.asp?email=benjamin.rogers
@enron.com>

Have ideas about how we can improve the Fool Direct or new
e-mail products you'd like to see? Try our discussion board:
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=239435
____________________________________________________
(c) Copyright 2000, The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. This
material is for personal use only. Republication and
redissemination, including posting to news groups, is expressly
prohibited without the prior written consent of The Motley Fool.

MsgId:
msg-30494-2000-12-12_9-17-21-3344111_2_Plain_MessageAddress.msg-09:23:42(12-12
-2000)
X-Version: mailer-sender-master,v 1.84
X-Version: mailer-sender-daemon,v 1.84
Message-Recipient: benjamin.rogers@enron.com


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 02/07/2001
10:03 AM ---------------------------

From:  Veronica Espinoza @ ENRON
               02/07/2001 09:37 AM

To: Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kim S
Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melinda Whalen/CAL/ECT@ECT, Dianne Seib/CAL/ECT@ECT,
Janie Aguayo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Derek Bailey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kevin
Meredith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ellen Wallumrod/NA/Enron@ENRON, Celeste
Cisneros/NA/Enron@Enron, Diane Anderson/NA/Enron@Enron, Tiffany
Williams/NA/Enron@Enron, Cindy Feldman/CAL/ECT@ECT, Patricia
Boulanger/CAL/ECT@ECT, Linda Sietzema/CAL/ECT@ECT, Sharon
Crawford/CAL/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya
Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lesli Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nidia
Mendoza/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT,
David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Darron C
Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Walter Guidroz/NA/Enron@Enron, Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Veronica Gonzalez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jean
Bell/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Credit Report--2/7/01


To hire(no) or to represent us(maybe)?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Walls Jr., Rob
Sent:	Monday, July 02, 2001 5:14 PM
To:	Williams, Robert C.; Sanders, Richard B.
Subject:	FW: Resume

	any interest?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Lee Larkin" <llarkin@foutsmoore.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Lee+20Larkin+22+20+3Cllarkin+40foutsmoore+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Monday, July 02, 2001 4:44 PM
To:	Walls Jr., Rob
Subject:	Resume

Rob-  Thank you for taking the time to talk  with me.  Per your request, attached is copy of my resume in two  formats.  Thanks for your help.
Lee M. Larkin
Board Certified- Civil Trial  Law-Texas Board of Legal Specialization
Fouts & Moore, L.L.P.
1300  Post Oak Blvd. Suite 2000
Houston, Texas 77056-8000
Telephone:  713-986-7200
Telefax: 713-986-7299
[The information contained in this  electronic mail transmission and any attachments are intended solely for the  addressee(s) named above.  If you are not an addressee, or responsible for  delivering this e-mail, you have received this e-mail in error and you are  strictly prohibited from reading or disclosing it.  The information  contained in this e-mail is highly confidential and may be subject to legally  enforceable privileges.  If you received this in error, please contact Lee  M. Larkin at 713-986-7200 or reply via electronic mail immediately to the person  sending this transmission and return this document to  same.]

 - Resume2.lml.doc << File: Resume2.lml.doc >>
 - Resume2.lml.wpd << File: Resume2.lml.wpd >>


From the most recent information we have, the most likely outcome appears to
be the following:

As we've discussed this week, the administration and the utilities continue
to have a very difficult time reaching agreement on 1) how much of the
undercollection the IOUs should absorb and how much consumers should absorb
and 2) how big the rate increase should be to manage the IOUs cash
flow/credit  problems (governor wants 10%, IOUs want at least 20%).
It remains likely that the Commission will rule today on relaxing regulations
to make it easier for the IOUs to enter into longer-term contracts w/out
getting 2nd and 3rd guessed by the Commission.
It is likely that the Commission will signal strongly that it will not let
the IOUs go bankrupt but will only go so far as to outline its plan for
considering and implementing a "rate stabilization" plan in Q1 2001.

That said, the stakes are very high and things could change dramatically
between now and 2 PM PST.  Just talked to two SVPs with PG&E and Edison and
they said that they don't know what the Commission will do at 2.

Jeff

	Joseph Alamo
	12/21/2000 12:30 PM

		 To: George McClellan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin McGowan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Stuart
Staley/LON/ECT@ECT, Lisa Yoho/NA/Enron@Enron, skean@enron.com, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Wanda
Curry/HOU/EES@EES, Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES,
Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mona L
Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, Jennifer Rudolph/HOU/EES@EES, Eric
Letke/DUB/EES@EES, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Michael Smith/ENRON@enronxgate
		 cc: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron, Lysa Akin/PDX/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: California PUC Decision Info/Update

On behalf of Jeff Dasovich, please note:

the California PUC decision will be available on
the PUC website @ 1:00 PM PST.

The Commission will continue the meeting @ 2:00 PM PST
to address the issue.

Thanks,

Joseph Alamo
Sr. Admin. Asst.
Government Affairs - The Americas
San Francisco CA


Good job - Randy.

Live to fight another day - I don't know if you know but I settled with Fort
James - we ripped up all three contracts for no money that netted us
approximately $15M in value through the elimination of the two power
contracts in the NW.  Wertz was on the other side.  Thought you might want to
know.

Thanks
Delainey


Joe, couple of points - a) please check spelling and typos closely and b) in
the first paragraph of the second page starting "The Commercial
Origination...." should end with ".... knowledge necessary to reach our
goals."

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 12/06/2000
07:47 PM ---------------------------

Joe Kishkill@ENRON
12/06/2000 08:12 PM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Latest

Dave,

Our final.

Kish
---------------------- Forwarded by Joe Kishkill/SA/Enron on 12/06/2000 08:13
PM ---------------------------

Miguel Padron
12/06/2000 06:56 PM
To: Joe Kishkill/SA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Latest

Joe, Keith disappeared so I made the changes...here is the latest...MP


Ken, how should I help promote the Senate bill?  Does it allow us to do a
many to many paper product financial exchange without regulation?  What would
you change about the Senate bill?

Mark


Mike talked to Prebon and changed the prices for these deals accordingly

577823 - $97.95
577824 - $98

Thanks for waiting,
Kate

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
04/11/2001 08:37 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Missing Deal for 4/10

What's the status of these prices?

   Kate Symes @ ECT                04/10/2001 06:28 PM

To: Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Missing Deal for 4/10

577824
sell sempra
np
Q2-02
$80

This is the other side of the EES sleeve - Prebon gave Mike these prices, and
he couldn't get ahold of them tonight, so we'll check in the morning.

Kate

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
04/10/2001 03:35 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Missing Deal for 4/10

Mike Driscol
Prebon
I am missing this deal:

Enron sells from Sempra 25 mw of Q2'02 NP-15 peak hrs at $98.00


New Albany will accept proposal assuming my deductible is limited to $1
million per occurence and my BI deductible is limited to 30 days and includes
full replacement revenue (less marginal fuel costs) after the 30 day period.


Gerald,

Thanks for your reply on the action plan. Regarding your concern of timing,
we expect Mtg 1 to be in early/mid Febr, Mtg 2 - mid/late Febr, Mtg 3 - late
Febr, and Mtg 4 - early March. Our biggest hurdle will likely be scheduling
of interviews with the 10 candidates over a period of 1-2 days - if we are
successful here we should have no trouble meeting the proposed time
schedule... What do you think?

Lisa

"Smith, Gerald B." <GBSmith@smith-graham.com> on 01/29/2001 05:57:07 PM
To: "'Lisa.Connolly@enron.com'" <Lisa.Connolly@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: RE: Initial Draft - Action Plan

Lisa, action plan looks good; only concern is over what time frame will this
take place. Based on my conversation with Jeff, he wanted to have finalist to
Mayor Brown towards the end of February or early March. That seems somewhat
aggressive based on action plan.

Gerald

-----Original Message-----
From: Lisa.Connolly@enron.com [mailto:Lisa.Connolly@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2001 10:16 AM
To: Jeff.Skilling@enron.com; etblaw@aol.com; gbsmith@smith-graham.com;
rcampos@eldoradocorp.com; shirley.h.tapscott@uth.tmc.edu
Cc: Steven.J.Kean@enron.com; Katherine.Brown@enron.com;
Sherri.Sera@enron.com; Maureen.McVicker@enron.com;
eximenez@smith-graham.com; debg@pdq.net; cgonzalez@eldoradocorp.com
Subject: Initial Draft - Action Plan
Importance: High

Action Plan

?? Meeting 1 - Presentations from key individuals to provide
?? information/insight into the important issues facing the new Fire Chief.
???? - where - Enron offices
???? - commitment - full day?
????????? - 3/4 day - presentations - estimate a total of about 4-5
presenters - 1hr? per presentation, including Q&A - (for example,
presentation of key points from TriData study and Dr. Persse, EMS Director,
has agreed to provide a presentation on EMS issues)
????????? - 1/4 day - committee members will jointly compile a list of key
attributes/qualifications seeking in potential candidates
???? - distribution of resumes from interested/pursued candidates (estimate
approximately 20 resumes)

?? Meeting 2 - Screen resumes and jointly decrease candidate list to 10
???? - where - Enron offices
???? - commitment - 1/2 day?

?? Meeting 3 - Interview the 10 candidates and jointly decrease candidate
?? list to 3
???? - where - Enron offices
???? - commitment - full day - each interviewee will be presented to the 5
committee members for a formal interview - Please note, logistically we may
not be able to bring in all 10 candidates on the same day and may have to
meet on two separate days

?? Meeting 4 - Meet with Mayor Brown to present candidate list of 3
???? - where - City Hall?

Please email comments/suggestions/questions as soon as possible.

Thanks,
Lisa


So where are you kayaking this weekend?

ckm


i have another friend now going (this just isn't fair) and would like to
retrieve my materials when you have a chance. i need to go badly.

Lisa J. Mellencamp
Enron North America Corp. - Legal
1400 Smith St.
Houston, TX  77002
Tel:  (713) 853-7986
Fax: (713) 646-3393
E-mail:  Lisa.Mellencamp@enron.com


Thank you Sir for your response and I do appreciate your very hard work that you have accomplished for us (Enron Corp).
I now agree with you on your approach and I also feel very positive about the merger and of course will do all I possibly can to help in the efforts.
Ever Faithful
Rudy Elizondo

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Wells, Tori L.   On Behalf Of Lay, Kenneth
Sent:	Monday, November 12, 2001 9:52 AM
To:	Elizondo, Rudy (ETS)
Subject:	RE:

I very much appreciate your e-mail and agree with most of what you said.  But for very practical reasons, the management and the Board decided a merger with Dynegy was the best alternative for Enron.

Thank you,

Ken

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Elizondo, Rudy (ETS)
Sent:	Thursday, November 08, 2001 12:42 PM
To:	Lay, Kenneth; Causey, Richard
Subject:

Ken, I am a loyal Enron Employee for over 17 years and my opinion (however insignificant) is that we stand and fight and not take any buy out offer from anyone.

I know that I speak for the rest of my team when I say lets stand and fight and not sell out to the first bidder who will not give us what we are really worth.  We are the best and continue to be the best in the energy world, that is my attitude every day that I proudly come to work.

Please reconsider and take our lumps like Columbia Gas System, like Continental Airlines and get back into solvency the best way we know how to.  The past is past, lets pick up ourselves by our boot straps and get back into the fight and win this one.

You know that you can count on me and the rest of my team in ETS to stand by this decision to stand and fight.

Ever Loyal and willing to serve.

Rudy Elizondo (ETS).

ps If you need more inspirational speeches from me, I will be happy to oblige.


Jeff,

Looks great! Minor grammatical edits only. See attached.

?

?

? Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com wrote:

OK, last call for comments. Need them by noon. I'll bring copies to class
for everyone, including Ms Tasker.

Best,
Jeff
(See attached file: case 3--Timberland Final Draft.doc) > ATTACHMENT part 2
application/msword name=case 3--Timberland Final Draft.doc

Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - Buy the things you want at great prices!
 - Dasovich_case 3_Timberland Final Draft.doc


Here is Greg Wolfe's information.

In addition, he has received the following LT equity:
Date  Type   Term  Number  Strike
12/31/97 KEYSOP Opt  10  1500   20.78
2/7/99  ECT LTCP Opt  10  6508   31.46
2/7/99  ECT LTCP RS  10  2468   31.46

What would you recommend for a contract structure?


---------------------- Forwarded by Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT on 07/18/2000 11:39
AM ---------------------------

ANITAREED@aol.com on 07/18/2000 11:04:42 AM
To: Randall.L.Gay@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Final for Kathleen, Fwd: Islander

And here's Mike's response.  After you two talk, please let me know the
outcome.

Anita

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <Mkbass1@aol.com>
From: Mkbass1@aol.com
Full-name: Mkbass1
Message-ID: <34.80a8ee6.26a5b3f3@aol.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2000 09:21:55 EDT
Subject: Re: Islander
To: ANITAREED@aol.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Mailer: AOL 5.0 for Windows sub 119

In a message dated 7/18/00 8:10:12 AM Central Daylight Time, ANITAREED writes:

>
>
The new article has no political overtures. It is strictly status info.

Mike Bass


        <title>The money.net Scoop</title>
        <BASE TARGET="_blank">
        <BASE HREF="http://www.money.net/">
	<link REL=STYLESHEET HREF="http://www.money.net/formatting/money.css" TYPE="text/css">
<map name="tabMap">
  <area shape="rect" coords="1,0,66,26" href="http://my.money.net/scripts/mainindex">
  <area shape="rect" coords="67,0,155,26" href="http://my.money.net/scripts/wrap?name=pages/tabs/2&wrap=yes&tab=2&frame=top">
  <area shape="rect" coords="156,0,248,26" href="http://my.money.net/scripts/mainmenu">
  <area shape="rect" coords="249,0,334,26" href="http://my.money.net/scripts/wrap?name=pages/tabs/7&wrap=yes&tab=7">
  <area shape="rect" coords="335,0,511,26" href="javascript:SetHomePage('www.money.net','http://www.money.net/mmyhp','affiliate_id');void(0);">
</MAP>
<MAP name="Map">
  <area shape="rect" coords="1,1,84,59" href="http://realtime.money.net/scripts/sectorlaunch">
  <area shape="rect" coords="84,1,148,59" href="http://realtime.money.net/scripts/heatlaunch">
  <area shape="rect" coords="148,1,228,59" href="http://realtime.money.net/scripts/marketlaunch">
  <area shape="rect" coords="228,1,276,59" href="http://www.money.net/pages/s2faq.html">
  <area shape="rect" coords="276,1,352,59" href="http://realtime.money.net/whatsnew.html">
</MAP>

<FORM ACTION="http://www.money.net/scripts/stocklookup" method="POST">

     NASDAQ 1880.51 0.00 0.00%
    DOW 9901.38 0.00 0.00%
    S&P 1142.66 0.00 0.00%

     QUOTES: <INPUT TYPE=TEXT NAME="symbol" SIZE="4"> <INPUT TYPE="IMAGE" ALIGN=absmiddle border="0" src="http://www.money.net/30images/newgo.gif" HEIGHT="17" WIDTH="30">
    </form>

		Please support our advertisers

Sponsored by: Kaplan College Financial Planning

The Scoop

                  The market cannot go up forever. Today was disappointing, but not unexpected. Even with today's weakness, the Nasdaq almost 6% since the Nov 12 low. Most every group was weak, or at best mixed. It was not simply a rotation from techs into defensive groups or cyclicals. Rather, traders went to cash. Volume was surprisingly strong, but we expect a quiet day tomorrow ahead of the Thanksgiving  The general negative tone for the market was partly established by The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development lowering its 2002 world economic growth forecast to 1% from 2.8% due to the aftershocks of the terrorist attacks. Also not helping the techs...

                  [Full Story]

Sponsored by:

		Dow Jones

		NASDAQ Comp.

Most Popular Stocks

 GX	1.60	0.00

 PALM	3.45	0.00

 CPHD	3.6	0.00

 ECNC	0.0295	0.00

 ENE	6.99	0.00

 XOXO	1.31	0.00

 BVSN	3.27	0.00

 CSCO	19.79	0.00

	money.net Feature

Now you can link back to Money.net no matter what site you're on with our new interactive Tool Bar. Jump to your streaming real time portfolio tracker, search for something on Google and check the latest sports scores with ESPN. Trust us, you will love this product!!!!!

www.athoc.com/wis/activate/default.asp?pid=20523&mktmsg=CA1

		If you have questions about our site, please email us at info@money.net.

		If there's a subject you'd like to read about, please email us at editor@money.net.

		To unsubscribe from this mailing, please click here to go to http://www.money.net/scripts/unsubscribe.

	?2001 Money.net Incorporated.

Market Data Provided in part by: MarketFeed.com, Reuters, Inc., S&P Comstock.

All quotes delayed at least 15 minutes. (Except in Screamer - Real-Time Portfolio Tracker)

Charts provided by Goinvest.com, Inc.

Terms and Conditions  • Privacy Policy

By accessing and using this page you agree to the Terms of Service.