Peter -

Should Tana add you to her list of people who get the daily EnronOnline
customer list?  She sends it out to several lawyers to see if there is any
reason not to give access to the system.

Mark

	Peter Keohane
	Sent by: Sharon Crawford
	12/14/2000 11:09 AM

		 To: Lara Fields/LON/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT, Rob Milnthorp/CAL/ECT@ECT, William S
Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Enron London - EOL Product
Control Group/LON/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: PA Review Bank of Nova Scotia

Sorry for the delay in responding.  I have now reviewed this matter with Rob
Milnthorp.  The status of Bank of Nova Scotia's financing arrangements to our
counterparty Beau Canada Exploration Ltd., which was recently purchased by
Murphy Oil  Canada Ltd., remains unclear.  However, until such time as that
has been clarified, including the Bank of Nova Scotia's consent to our
security for our mark-to-market positions with Beau Canada (now Murphy Oil
Canada), Bank of Nova Scotia should not, at the request of Enron Canada, be
added to EOL.

Peter

To: Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc: Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT, Rob Milnthorp/CAL/ECT@ECT, William S
Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Enron London - EOL Product
Control Group/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: PA Review Bank of Nova Scotia

Peter-

Can you please tell me if we must continue to refuse access to EnronOnline
for The Bank of Nova Scotia?  They have sent in another Password Application
to apply today.

If we must continue to refuse them, can you please tell me what message I
should convey to them?

Thank you,
Lara

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources
	Canada Corp.

	From:  Peter Keohane                           26/09/2000 00:17

To: Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Lara Fields/LON/ECT@ECT, Rob Milnthorp/CAL/ECT@ECT, William S
Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: PA Review Bank of Nova Scotia

Justin, Enron Canada is currently in an unresolved dispute with Bank of Nova
Scotia where from our perspective Bank of Nova Scotia has essentially been
telling us to shove off.  The dispute involves BNS's purported requirement to
consent to collateral security given to Enron Canada for physical and
financial trading positions with a counterparty known as Beau Canada.
Neither Bank of Nova Scotia nor any affiliate of Bank of Nova Scotia should
be traded OnLine and all trading ought to be monitored until such time as
this matter is resolved, and this should be expressly communicated to Bank of
Nova Scotia.  They can speak to me directly at 403.974.6923 or to our
President and CEO, Rob Milnthorp at 403.974.6714.

I am copying this memo to Bill Bradford and Mark Taylor for their information.

Justin Boyd
09/25/2000 08:36 AM
To: Lara Fields/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: PA Review Bank of Nova Scotia

Lara

Subject to approval from Peter (the C/P is a Canadian corporate), I approve
for all products except for US power, weather and credit

Peter - thanks!

Justin

To: Edmund Cooper/LON/ECT@ECT, Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT, Debbie
Nicholls/LON/ECT@ECT, Gail Hill/LON/ECT@ECT, Enron London - EOL Product
Control Group/LON/ECT@ECT, Enron Europe Global CounterParty, Annette
Schneider/LON/ECT@ECT, ECT London Credit, Enron Europe Global Contracts and
Facilities, EOL Marketing Europe@ECT
cc:

Subject: PA Review Bank of Nova Scotia

Hello all,

The Bank of Nova Scotia would like to trade with us online.  They are in GCP
as #54087 and are existing customers of Enron Metals (Jimmy Gordon is the one
who got them to send in the PA if that helps!).

Could you please let us know your comments in the S: access Database?

thank you,
Lara
---------------------- Forwarded by Lara Fields/LON/ECT on 25/09/2000 14:52
---------------------------

London Fax System
25/09/2000 14:28
To: Enron London - EOL Product Control Group/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: New fax received (Likely sender: 0207 588 1542).

You have received a new fax from 0207 588 1542

The image contains 3 page(s).


Liz Purcell

Phone: (713) 582 3707


::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
     Delivering Intel technology to your inbox
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

Dear Martin,

We're contacting you because you signed up at
Real.com a while ago to receive news about the
Intel(R) Pentium(R) III processor and Intel(R)
WebOutfitter(SM) Service.  This e-mail is to
inform you that you will now receive updates
on Intel's processors and products for the home,
courtesy of the free Intel(R) Home Computing
Newsletter.

In the first issue, you'll hear about the brand
new Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 processor, a new
generation of processor created to take
advantage of tomorrow's Internet technology.  In
future issues, you'll learn about our other
products (yes, we do make more than processors)
that are making the Internet a more interesting
place to be, like the Intel(R) Wireless Game Pad,
the Intel(R) Pocket PC Camera, and the Intel(R)
AnyPoint(TM) Wireless Home Network.

http://p0.com/t.d?LkABJ_j8=intel/wireless_2series/index.htm
http://p0.com/t.d?BEABJ_j8=intel/pccamera/index.htm
http://p0.com/t.d?akABJ_j8=intel/anypoint/index.htm

You'll also receive general news and information
about how our technology is changing your home
computing experience.

Keep an eye on your inbox.  You'll be receiving
your first issue of the Intel Home Computing
Newsletter shortly.

Subscription Info
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

Change your e-mail address for the Home Computing
Newsletter.

http://intel.p0.com/hc_update.dyn?i=224685188&s=4zWp

Choose from HTML or text as your preferred format
for receiving the Home Computing Newsletter.

http://intel.p0.com/hc_update.dyn?i=224685188&s=4zWp

Unsubscribe from this newsletter in one easy step.

http://intel.p0.com/unsubscribe.dyn?i=224685188&s=4zWp

For questions, or to make comments or suggestions,
simply reply to this newsletter.

*Legal Information and Privacy Policy
(c) 2000 Intel Corporation

http://p0.com/t.d?cEABJ_j8=intel/sites/corporate/tradmarx.htm
http://p0.com/t.d?LkABJ_j8=intel/sites/corporate/privacy.htm


Subject: FW: Choking!!! Sorry this is just too funny not to pass along!

> Choking-what to do?
>
> Two cowboys from Texas walk into a roadhouse to wash the trail dust
> from their throats. They stand at the bar, drinking their beers and
> talking
> quietly about cattle prices.
>
> Suddenly, a woman at a table behind them, who had been eating a
> sandwich, begins to cough. After a minute or so, it becomes apparent that
> she is in real distress, and the cowboys turn to look at her.
>
> " Kin ya swaller?" asks one of the Texans. The woman shakes her head.
>
> " Kin ya breathe?" asks the other. The woman, beginning to turn a bit
>   blue shakes her head again.
>
> The first cowboy walks over to her, lifts up the back of her skirt,
> yanks down her panties, and slowly runs his tongue from the back of her
> thigh,up her buttock, and up to the small of her back. This shocks the
> woman
> to the point that with a violent spasm, the obstruction flies out of her
> mouth, and she begins to breathe again.
>
> The cowboy walks back over to the bar and takes a pull on his beer.
>
> His partner says, " Ya know, I'd heard of that there 'hind lick'
> maneuver, but I never seen anybody do it."
>
>
>


Vlady..
this was the list John referenced the other day.
Ted
---------------------- Forwarded by Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT on 08/09/2000 02:30 PM
---------------------------

From:  Ted Murphy
06/28/2000 07:45 AM

To: Rick Buy
cc:
Subject: VAR Priorities

Rick,
This is my initial attempt to summarize our meeting with John.  The next
steps would be to solicit feedback from other interested parties and scope
the resources and responsibilities.
Ted

Rick Buy, John Lavorato and I met to discuss priorities as it relates to the
calculation of VAR.  We are making the following recommendations

 1) Inclusion of monthly index positions into VAR calculations as the
indicies set in North American Natural Gas
 2) Development of a methodology to re-run correlations (factor loadings)
including criteria, responsibilities and acceptance/rejection criteria
 3) Development of process by which to analyze the output of factor loading
process.  Database to store output and management reports.
 4) Finalize debate on the calculation of Forward/Forward volatility
 5) Scope a project to analyze the possibility of calculating hourly
volatility for power.

It was further recommended that we continue to not include unpriced index
positions in VAR calculation.


FYI.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dietz, Rick
Sent:	Friday, August 31, 2001 8:47 AM
To:	Buchanan, John
Cc:	Blair, Lynn
Subject:	RE: Oneok meeting

It will be done today.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Buchanan, John
Sent:	Thursday, August 30, 2001 3:46 PM
To:	Dietz, Rick
Cc:	Blair, Lynn; Buchanan, John
Subject:	Oneok meeting

Rick will you please let me know when you reverse the TW K imbalance of $224.00 on K 37652 that was discussed during the Oneok meeting.

Thanks: John Buchanan


Folks,

I am forwarding this in order for the team to focus on the naphtha issue.
Please note that:

As Phase II comes on line, Blocks B and C will first have to run on naphtha
for a period of 3-6 months
This will hit us some time in 2001, hence is a more urgent issue than LNG,
which is still a year away
If there are delays in the commissioning of the Regas terminal, the period on
naphtha could further prolong
The naphtha market is more volatile than the crude market, and is not as
deep, hence we need to take small positions early on to test the market
DPC Board has already approved a Risk Management Policy that allows for
hedging.  We may need to look into options that are costless (selling put and
buying call) to begin with, and test while only Block A is in place.
Close coordination will be required on this with the Global Markets group,
and I propose someone like Anshuman should actually be seconded onto the group
A whole plan on tools to manage the fuel risk need to be worked in close
coordination with the team on the ground

These are just some of my thoughts.  With 50% of the tariff being fuel price
dependent, this is an area that requires close attention.

Regards,
Sandeep.
---------------------- Forwarded by Sandeep Kohli/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
01/03/2001 10:29 AM ---------------------------

Tushar Dhruv@ENRON
01/02/2001 09:25 PM
To: Neil McGregor/SIN/ECT@ECT, Sandeep
Kohli/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mukesh
Tyagi/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, pavan.dave@enron.com, Anshuman
Srivastav/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Marc De La Roche/HOU/ECT@ECT, Doug Leach/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Naphtha hedge for 2001

Current level of naphtha prices and the crude futures curve being
backwardated provide an opportune time for DPC to enter into a hedge for all
or a portion of its naphtha requirements for the year 2001.  We (EFI) would
like to explore this possibility before this situation passes.  Please
advise.  Best regards,

  -- Tushar


Your review and approval of the following product type in the EOL Datamanager
is needed (for directions on approval , please see steps for approval at the
bottom of this e-mail)

Trader:  Sarah Mulholland

US ResidOil Swap Platts No. 6 1%         Apr01           USD/bl/m

A US Residual Fuel Oil financial Swap Transaction with Enron North America
Corp. under which the Seller pays a Floating Price and the Buyer pays the
price submitted by Counterparty on the Website (the Fixed Price) in each case
in respect of the Notional Quantity per Determination Period. Each calendar
month during the term of the Transaction will be a Determination Period.  The
Notional Quantity per Determination Period shall be the volume submitted by
Counterparty on the Website.  The Payment Date(s) will be 5 business days
after the Floating Price is determinable.  The Floating Price shall be the
Index for the relevant Determination Period.
The term of the Transaction shall be from the Effective Date of 01 Apr 2001
to the Termination Date of 30 Apr 2001.
The Index used shall be the arithmetic average of the mean of the daily
quotations for No. 6, 1%S Max appearing under the heading "New York/Boston
Cargo" in the section entitled "Product Price Assessments" for those issues
of Platt's Oilgram Price Reports published for the applicable Determination
Period.
The price is quoted in US Dollars per unit of volume, which will be the
Contractual Currency.
The unit of measure against which the price is quoted shall be Barrels per
month and the quantity shown shall be in Barrels per month.

STEPS FOR APPROVAL:

click the  START button
select  PROGRAMS
select  TEST APPLICATIONS
select ENRONONLINE CLUSTER(PROD)
 PROCEED WITH USUAL LOGIN/PASSWORD
click the Enron Online Production Cluster "START" button
select EnronOnLine (this is the EOL Datamanager)
 PROCEED WITH EOL LOGIN/PASSWORD
click on the "+" for EnronOnLine
click on the "+" for Product Types
click on the "+" for "Awaiting Approval" (OR  "Partially Approved")
select the product requiring review as stated in e-mail above
Right "mouse" click on "properties" to view product set-up
TO APPROVE:  Right mouse click on "Approved"


Richard:? Here is the transcript from Sunday showing the examination of Bruce
McLeod (Hennegan's firm).? Look at pages 16-30, where McLeod takes a minor
run at Enron.

 <<Schultes 8.06.txt>>
Steve

P.S.? I just learned that Schultes did not finish today and is going again
tomorrow.

This e-mail message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee
or agent responsible for delivery of this message to the intended
recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail message is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify
the sender and delete this e-mail message from your computer.

 - Schultes 8.06.txt


Wendi:
It would help if in whatever you send to her today that Enron preserves its
right to call for margin in the future pursuant to the terms of the agreement
 taht we have with them and that by cancelling the margin call we in no way
waive our right to make future calls.
Carol

	Wendi LeBrocq@ENRON
	06/16/2000 11:19 AM

		 To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Molly Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Ferrellgas

Carol:

I called Ferrellgas for Margin yesterday, 6/15, for COB 6/14.  However,
today's MTM is under the threshold, thus no longer resulting in the need for
Margin.  I spoke with Erin Hamilton at Ferrellgas and she requested
confirmation, using today's MTM, that the previous Margin call should be
cancelled.  Should there be any specific language used in a cancellation
confirmation about reserving the right to call for Margin in the future, even
though we will cancel the Margin call for COB 6/14?  Please let me know your
thoughts.

Thank you,

Wendi LeBrocq
x33835


Thanks.  Its nice to hear a kind word every once in a while.  Its been a
tough quarter.  Im glad we are making progress in this area, it is a priority.

Mike


fye   this is not a typo
----- Forwarded by Barbara N Gray/HOU/ECT on 10/23/2000 07:34 PM -----

	Scott Josey@ENRON
	10/23/2000 06:14 PM

		 To: Barbara N Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Wildhorse/Crescendo

Barbara,
I wanted to thank you again for your assistance and insight in the Crescendo
matters.  I particularly appreciate your effort to set up the meeting with
Stan Horton.  The meeting was helpful and it was the right decision to go
forward with the meeting.  By the way, I believe that Gerald is doing a great
job.
Thanks again,
Scott


The following are Enron's offers for May 200 supplies

Trunkline ELA base 3000 $3.065

Panhandle Field Base 10,000  Index less .0075

NGPL Midcontinent base 11,000 Index less .0075

NICOR City Gate Base 3,000 Index +0.

Please call  Tom Donohoe at 713-853-7151.


Sally here is the information that you requested per Thresa Allen.
Leslie Reeves(x3-7962) direct reports:
Thresa Allen(x3-6598)
Kim Theriot(x3-1771)
Dan Houston(x3-1416)

Kristin Albrecht(x3-4763) direct reports:
Stacey White(x3-1870)
Donnie Vinson- 834-7973 or 503-464-7973 (Senior Specialist-Portland)
Monica Lande- 834-3722 or 503-464-3722 (Senior Specialist-Portland)
Valarie Sabo- 834-3910  or 503-464-3910 (Senior Specialist-Portland)

If you need additional information please let me know.

Thanks
Lisa x39194


---------------------- Forwarded by Peter F Keavey/HOU/ECT on 03/16/2000
02:11 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Kal Shah                           03/15/2000 03:52 PM

To: Peter F Keavey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Zal Masani/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill
White/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Palmer, Rahil Jafry
Subject: Focus Group with traders -- EnronOnline Commercial

As per our conversation today, I am helping Enron's ad agency develop a
television commercial about EnronOnline.  Their creative team would like to
meet with a few Enron traders to learn first hand about what traders like,
dislike, what motivates them, their work environment, etc.  This will help us
make the commercial more realistic.  Would you or a couple of traders in your
team be able to attend a focus group next Tuesday, March 21st from 11:45 to 1
p.m. in the Enron Building? I'll send you the meeting room info. later.  We
will serve lunch.  Please let me know.  Your input will be very useful in
creating an effective ad.

Kal Shah
ext. 39354


- Apr12$12.jpg
 - Apr12$11.jpg
 - Apr12$10.jpg
 - Apr12$08.jpg


i'll ask

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Baumbach, David
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 1:29 PM
To:	Bass, Eric
Subject:	RE:

although he may be a little out of my league

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bass, Eric
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 1:20 PM
To:	Baumbach, David
Subject:	RE:

i doubt it - he usually shops in town for his

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Baumbach, David
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 7:39 AM
To:	Bass, Eric
Subject:

I'm looking for a suit ... does your dad know a good place to get one in Sugar Land?

Dave


No.  In fact, Gulf has been asked by AEC to join them in a meeting with
WFEC.  Is there any problem from your perspective with Gulf participating in
such a meeting?  Now that our joint petition for declaratory statement has
been filed, Gulf has agreed to attend such a meeting which is in the process
of being set up for sometime in the next 7 to 10 days.  Of course, we intend
to hold to the position stated in the joint petition and assume that you
would as well.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gerald.Nemec@enron.com [SMTP:Gerald.Nemec@enron.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 10:26 AM
> To: JASTONE@southernco.com
> Cc: Chris.Hilgert@enron.com; Mark.Knippa@enron.com; susanc@katzlaw.com
> Subject: RE: petition for declaratory statement
>
> Jeff,  At this point we are considering approaching WFEC and AEC to
> discuss this with them.  Do you see any potential pitfalls from your side
> with doing so?
>
>  -----Original Message-----
>  From: Stone, Jeff A.
>  Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 7:31 AM
>  To: ''Gerald.Nemec@enron.com' '
>  Cc: ''susanc@katzlaw.com' '; ''Mark.Knippa@enron.com' ';
> ''Chris.Hilgert@enron.com' '; Anthony, Timothy S. (Gulf Power); Badders,
> Russell A.; Livingston, Robert G.; Ritenour, Susan D.
>  Subject: RE: petition for declaratory statement
>  Sensitivity: Confidential
>
>  Here is the "official" information from the FPSC website about our
> joint filing:
>
>  Docket No. 010265-EI      Docketed: 2/26/01
>       Joint petition for declaratory statement concerning eligibility
> of public utility to serve customer pursuant to Section 366.03, Florida
> Statutes, by Gulf Power Company and Enron Compression Services Company.
>
>  As of the close of business on 2/27, there was no further
> information available
>
>
>
>


539859 - buy PGET
539861 - sell EES

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
03/07/2001 08:13 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject:

Hi Kate,
What's the status of these two deals?

   Kate Symes @ ECT                03/06/2001 05:41 PM

To: Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: 3/06/ Checkout

Evelyn, I'm so sorry I haven't found these deals yet! I've left messages with
Mike Swerzbin and Matt Motley, but I don't see these trades in either of
their logs - or even in the short term trade logs. One of those guys should
be back in the office momentarily, and I'll let you know when I've talked to
them.

Kate

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
03/06/2001 03:15 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: 3/06/ Checkout

Amerex West
All deals checked out fine.

Bloomberg
All deals checked out fine.

Prebon

Mike Swerbin
I am missing the following deals:
Enron buys from PGET 25 mw of May PV at $272
Enron sells to EES 25 mw of May PV at $268.


From: ISO

ISO cancelled STAGE 2 electrical emergency, in effect since 05/08/2001 11:15, effective 05/08/2001 23:00

For more information contact:
webmaster@caiso.com

EDIS-05-08-01 2252 PDT

---------------------------------------------------------
To update or terminate your subscription to this email service
visit our webpage at http://www.incident.com/edismail.html.

EDIS is operated by the Governor's Office of Emergency Services,
State of California. This email relay is offered by incident.com
as a public service. Because of the complexity of this system and
its dependence on other systems, we cannot be responsible for
delays or failures in transmission.
---------------------------------------------------------


_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp

 - 10-15 1600 Report.xls


Dear Eric Bass,

Thank you for shopping with 1-800-FLOWERS.COM.

The gift you selected Dozen Daisies In Vase, will be delivered to Shanna on
11/21/00.

Below is a summary of your order :

Recipient :
Shanna Husser at:
Enron
1400 Smith
Houston, TX 77002

Order Summary :
Order number is 561601300.
Product : Dozen Daisies In Vase :    39.99
Service Charge        :    7.99
Tax(where applicable) :    3.96
Total Charge          :   51.94

If you have any questions, please feel to email us at
custservice@1800flowers.com, visit our online customer service chat, or call
our customer service department toll-free at 1-800-468-1141.

Sincerely,

Meredith McArdle
Director of Customer Services
1-800-FLOWERS.COM

Complete the Feast this Thanksgiving with a special treat or pretty
centerpiece from 1-800-FLOWERS.COM.  If you can't be there for dinner, send
the perfect gift!  Click here to see our Thanksgiving Collection of
complete-the-feast gifts.

http://www.1800flowers.com/cgi-bin/800f/collection.pl/psmg/17/0/0/0/0/0


Mark,

What would be the best time to call you tomorrow to discuss the workshop?

Vince
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Andreas Simou" <andreas.simou@garp.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Andreas+20Simou+22+20+3Candreas+2Esimou+40garp+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Tuesday, September 18, 2001 10:51 AM
To:	VKaminski@aol.com; vkamins@enron.com; Mark Williams
Subject:	GARP 2002 Convention

Dear Vince and Mark

Further to my voicemail, I am writing concerning  the GARP 2002 Convention. I hope that both of you, your friends and family  are okay and safe. Along with other professionals in the financial industry, my  colleagues and I at GARP, have been affected by this tragedy.

I have had an opportunity to speak to the vast  number of 2002 Convention speakers since yesterday and the overwhelming response  has been to proceed with the Convention. Indeed, there seems to be a determined  effort not to let what happened last week bring the financial world to a  standstill. I also believe that this is a time that NY requires all the support  it can get, both emotionally and financially. As such, I am searching for  new venues within Manhattan, but this is a very difficult task, as you can  imagine. As soon as I have any news about venue and possible change of dates I  will be in touch.

Barring any unforeseen events or meetings, I would  like to know whether you can confirm that you will still be taking part as a  speaker at the GARP 2002 Convention? I, and a great number of financial risk  professionals that I have mentioned the workshop to, are still very keen to have  you there. As such, I would very much like to have the energy risk management  agenda in the next few days.

Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have  any questions or queries. I look forward to your  response and hope that you are able to join us and your peers at GARP  2002.

Kind regards

Andreas

______________________
Andreas  Simou
Conference Director, GARP
Tel: +44 (0)20 7626 9301
Fax: +44 (0)20  7626 9900www.garp.com << File: http://www.garp.com >>


Ginger:

Could you please forward this along to the Quinn-Gillespie folks---David
Lugar in particular?  Thanks very much.

Others:
Attached are excerpts from the California Leg Analyst's Report--an
"independent" institution in Sacramento--on the electricity crisis, the plan
thus far to address it, and the effect that the solution might have on the
State's financial position.  Also have attached URL to full report.
http://www.lao.ca.gov/analysis_2001/2001_pandi/pandi_toc_anl2001.html

Best,
Jeff


my number is (713)807-1699


We've never done this, I'm just thinking they may work with us on it since no
one knew the rates were going to be effective 2/1/2001.

Suzanne Calcagno@ENRON
02/05/2001 10:54 AM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Trco Backhaul Rates

Does that usually work?  Do you get a secondary priority or do they flow it
as primary?  I'm not used to getting discounts so I'm curious!


Wrong week - that's next week!


FYI--Ranelle did some research on the Std. L requirements for both
companies.  Please call her direct if you have any questions.
---------------------- Forwarded by Glen Hass/ET&S/Enron on 09/12/2000 03:30
PM ---------------------------
From: Ranelle Paladino on 09/12/2000 02:39 PM
To: Glen Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dari Dornan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay
Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Darveaux/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Maria
Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: marketing affiliate filing

After speaking with several of you about the standards of conduct filing
(Standard L changed), here is my summary of what has/hasn't been done.

For NNG, no tariff sheets need to be changed at this time.  The tariff
currently states that NNG does not share marketing employees with its
marketing affiliates.  The tariff also states that the only shared facility
is the Houston office.  Both of these items are still true.  The EES employee
on 2 in this building is not considered an employee of an NNG marketing
affiliate.  As far as compliance with the posting requirements on the
internet, all affiliate information, job descriptions, organization charts,
and corporate structure are available.  I talked with Toby today about an
indicator when the information is updated.  The web site currently does not
have a specific date as to when the information was last updated.  The
organization charts have a date in the left hand corner to indicate the date
the chart was put together which would change as the chart information
changed.  Dari, to be in compliance with Standard L, does Toby need to add an
indicator showing when the information was last updated?  Also, it is my
understanding that Dari will put together the filing letter.

For TW, tariff sheets will need to change to reflect that they are sharing
office space with their affiliate in Albuquerque and in this office building
with the EES employee on 2.  The posted information for TW would be the same
as for NNG so the question still exists as to whether Toby would need to add
an indicator of when the information was last updated.  Would Mary be
preparing the tariff sheets and Maria preparing the letter?

In a copy of a Tennessee filing that Maria gave me, Tennessee proposed taking
the marketing affiliate information out of the tariff completely because it
wasn't possible to meet the "update within 3 days" requirement stated in
Standard L through changing tariff sheets.  Instead, Tennessee will have this
information on their website.  The order accepting their filing came out
August 23rd.  Is this of interest to anyone?

Please let me know if I have left out anything.  Thanks.
Ranelle


---------------------- Forwarded by Gavin Dillingham/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
09/01/2000 01:40 PM ---------------------------

Jeff Dasovich@EES
09/01/2000 01:30 PM
To: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@ENRON
cc: Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Sandra McCubbin/SFO/EES@EES, Mona L
Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES, Gavin
Dillingham/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON, Harry
Kingerski/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, James D
Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES

Subject: Re: California Lawmakers Vote to Limit Power Costs - WSJ

Here are some more prices.  Many thanks to Roger Yang.

Steven J Kean@ENRON
09/01/2000 08:27 AM
Sent by: Steven J Kean@ENRON
To: Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES, Sandra
McCubbin/SFO/EES@EES, Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES
cc: Gavin Dillingham/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Harry
Kingerski/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, James D
Steffes/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: California Lawmakers Vote to Limit Power Costs - WSJ

Look at this.  Baum finally speaks up  -- way too late.
Can somebody tell me what SDG&E's energy rate was pre-dereg?
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 09/01/2000
08:24 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Ann M Schmidt                           09/01/2000 07:57 AM

To: Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Meredith Philipp/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: California Lawmakers Vote to Limit Power Costs - WSJ

F.Y.I.

  California Lawmakers Vote to Limit Power Costs
  By Rebecca Smith

  09/01/2000
  The Wall Street Journal
  Page A4
  (Copyright (c) 2000, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)

  California lawmakers voted to extend modest relief to San Diego residents
burdened with
  high electricity bills and set the groundwork for faster construction of
badly needed power
  plants. They stopped short, however, of passing legislation that would roll
back retail power
  rates to levels seen prior to deregulation .

  Late Wednesday, lawmakers sent a bill to Gov. Gray Davis that limits to 6.5
cents per
  kilowatt hour the amount that small customers of San Diego Gas & Electric
Co. can be
  charged. The utility is allowed to add power-delivery and other reasonable
costs to that
  commodity price.

  The price, equivalent to a bulk power cost of $65 per megawatt hour, is far
higher than the
  average price of power for 27 of the 31 months in which California's market
has been
  deregulated. But in June and July, the average price of power obtained by
the utility from a
  state-sanctioned energy auction rose to 12 cents and 10.5 cents,
respectively, compared
  with the 2.3 cents and 2.8 cents charged in those months a year earlier.

  Passed directly through to customers,the resulting bills sparked a near
mutiny. The
  rate-cap measure applies to residential and small commercial customers, as
well as to
  schools and hospitals.

  In addition to the rate cap, which can be adjusted upward or downward by
the California
  Public Utilities Commission until December 2002, the legislature earmarked
$150 million of
  general-fund revenue, which can be used to subsidize San Diego power costs
if they greatly
  exceed the 6.5-cents-per-kilowatt-hour rate. For now, the utility would be
expected to make
  up any difference between revenue collected and the actual cost.

  Steve Baum, chairman of Sempra Energy, parent of San Diego Gas & Electric
Co., said the
  rate-cap measure is "deeply flawed" because it limits the amount prices can
rise but sets
  no floor. That means any shortfall could grow -- without a mechanism for
customers to pay
  it down -- until the end of the rate-cap period, which could last until
December 2002 or
  December 2003.

  Mr. Baum said Sempra stands to suffer an undercollection of perhaps $664
million, provided
  future prices approximate the New York Mercantile Exchange forward prices
through
  December 2002. "It's irreparably damaging to Sempra," he said because it
"creates
  tremendous uncertainty" that makes it hard for the San Diego energy company
to finance
  new projects such as a new transmission line.

  The legislature also appeared likely to approve a bill speeding up the
permit process for the
  construction of new power plants, in part by beefing up staffs of
regulatory agencies that
  review the plans.

  Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Marshall:  Attached are the drafts of the two KCS confirms.  I need to speak
with you about the mechanics of the termination.  Please call me.  Thanks.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 05/29/2001 02:20 PM -----

	Diane Anderson@ENRON
	05/29/2001 08:40 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: KCS - VC0917 & VC09

---------------------- Forwarded by Diane Anderson/NA/Enron on 05/29/2001
08:40 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Diane Anderson                           05/25/2001 04:07 PM

To: Tanya Rohauer/Enron@EnronXGate, Derek Bailey/Enron@EnronXGate
cc:

Subject: KCS - VC0917 & VC09

Attached please see for your review the KCS confirms with the additional
provision provided by Sara Shackelton:

-Diane


Good Afternoon all!

I just received a call from Cheryl detailing that she will be working from home on a project for Frank Sayre.  If you need to reach her you may call her at home at (713)785-6152.  If you need further assistance, please feel free to contact me directly.  Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Keegan
Enron Wholesale Services
713-345-3317


----- Forwarded by Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT on 03/16/2001 03:09 PM -----

	Stacy E Dickson
	03/15/2001 10:48 AM

		 To: tporter@hess.com
		 cc: Cary M Carrabine/Corp/Enron@Enron@ECT
		 Subject: Credit Language

Mr Porter:

Per the request of Cary Carrabine, attached please find my review of the
credit that you proposed to add to the Master Firm Purchase/Sale Agreement.
Please call me with your comments at (713) 853-5705.

Sincerely,

Stacy Dickson


?
Regards,
Ben Bedell
ESBIN & BEDELL, LLP
495 South Main St.
New City, New York 10956
Phone: 845-634-7909
Fax: 845-634-4160
?

The information contained in this electronic message is confidential and
intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the
reader  of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or
agent  responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified  that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this
communication is  strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, please  immediately notify us by telephone at?845-
634-7909 or by e-mail at bbb@debt-masters.com.

The information contained in this electronic mail message is privileged and
confidential and is or may be protected by the attorney- client privilege,
the  work product doctrine, joint defense privileges, trade secret
protections,  and/or other applicable protections from disclosure. The sender
of this  electronic mail message intends to preserve the confidentiality of
the enclosed  information and does not waive any applicable privilege or
protection from  disclosure. Thank you.

?
?
 - 224-86.Funding Memo.xls


Please set up the two books attached.  Shout with any questions.  Thanks.
PL
3-7376


Thanks for the response.  I think you are right that engaging an architect is
the next logical step.  I had already contacted Cary Kipp and sent him the
floor plan.
He got back to me yesterday with his first draft.  He took my plan and
improved it.  I am going to officially engage Cary to draw the plans.  While
he works on those I wanted to try and work out a detailed specification
list.  Also, I would like to visit a couple of homes that you have built and
speak to 1 or 2 satisfied home owners.  I will be in San Marcos on Friday
April 13th.  Are there any homes near completion that I could walk through
that day?  Also can you provide some references?

Once I have the plans and specs, I will send them to you so you can adjust
your bid.

Phillip


This offer is being sent to you as a member of SaveRealBig.com. If you feel
you are receiving this message in error or do not wish to receive future
messages, please see the unsubscribe instructions at the bottom of this
email.
 GetSmart offers more customers the smart chip advantage!
  At GetSmartsm, we think every customer  deserves a smart offer. That?s why we?re adding a smart chip  to every GetSmart Visa
 card, including our GetSmart Visa Platinum,  Gold AND Classic card!    CLICK  TO APPLY!   Plus, GetSmart gives you more than the smart chip  card that prepares you for added convenience and security in the future!  GetSmart is also a one-stop marketplace for your financial needs?from  auto loans and mortgages to savings products.  Thank you.
   *The introductory rate on purchases is for 2 or 3 billing periods after  account opening depending upon the account for which you qualify. For more  complete pricing information, see Important  Terms and Conditions  for GetSmart Visa.    You must be a U.S. resident and at least 18 years of age to apply. This  offer may not be available to current Providian credit card customers and  employees of Providian. GetSmart Visa is currently available in all U.S.  states except Wisconsin.  If you previously asked to be excluded from GetSmart or Providian product  offerings and solicitations, we apologize for this e-mail. Every effort  was made to ensure that you were excluded from our database. If you wish  to be removed from future GetSmart e-mail promotions, click REMOVE  ME .  Providian National Bank - Member FDIC Providian Bank - Member FDIC

Please allow at least 48 hours for your unsubscribe requests to be processed.
Remove yourself from this list by either:
Entering your email address below and clicking REMOVE:
 OR
Reply to this message with the word "remove" in the subject line.
This message was sent to address andrew.h.lewis@enron.com pmguid:9k.vyk.edkxk  pmg


i am just giving you guys a hard time.  we can square everything in sept.


Martin,

A request for the letter of recommendation.

Vince

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	VKaminski@aol.com@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, January 24, 2002 8:03 PM
To:	Kaminski, Vince J
Subject:	Fwd: Reference request regarding Eric W Cope S05371/R966

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-Path: <kbl@research.att.com>
Received: from  rly-za04.mx.aol.com (rly-za04.mail.aol.com [172.31.36.100]) by air-za05.mail.aol.com (v83.35) with ESMTP id MAILINZA51-0124173949; Thu, 24 Jan 2002 17:39:49 -0500
Received: from  mail-green.research.att.com (mail-green.research.att.com [135.207.30.103]) by rly-za04.mx.aol.com (v82.22) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINZA48-0124173900; Thu, 24 Jan 2002 17:39:00 -0500
Received: from akalice.research.att.com (akalice.research.att.com [135.207.26.22])	by mail-green.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D01F81E0AB	for <VKaminski@aol.com>; Thu, 24 Jan 2002 17:38:57 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from kbl@localhost)	by akalice.research.att.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/8.8.7) id RAA52811;	Thu, 24 Jan 2002 17:38:57 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 17:38:57 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <200201242238.RAA52811@akalice.research.att.com>
From: AT&T Web Resume Database <resume@research.att.com>
To: VKaminski@aol.com, kbl@research.att.com
Subject: Reference request regarding Eric W Cope S05371/R966
X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"

Dear Colleague:

Eric W Cope has submitted an application to AT&T Labs,
with a request that we seek a reference letter from you in support of this application.
We thank you in advance for providing this letter.  The reference letters are
a very important part of our evaluation process, but we also recognize that
they call for a significant measure of time and attention on your part.
In this message, we first describe below the three options for submittal
of the letter, and then, in the final paragraphs, you will find some
comments about the nature of the job applied for.

We know your time is precious, so we have tried to make the
process as efficient as possible.  If you have access to a browser
from your mailer, then the easiest thing is to use the URL given below:

  http://www.research.att.com/~kbl/cgi-bin/resumedocs/S05371/R966

Via this web page, you can submit text, html, postscript, or pdf files.
Please note that this URL should be used ONLY by you, and ONLY for
this particular student.  It is linked directly to the student's resume,
and the processing occurs automatically and immediately.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
If it is inconvenient to use the URL, you may email your letter by replying
to this email, but please help us out, if you use this option, by sending
the letter as plain text only, not as a word processor file, without indent, and
not as an attachment.  Also please make sure that your mailer includes
the entire subject line in your reply message.
If you use this option, please note that the processing of your letter
will occur manually, and therefore may entail a considerable delay.

Our system will format the emailed text appropriately for display, unless
you ask that it be treated as fixed-format.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
As a third option, if you prefer you may submit your letter as hard copy.  Please
note that we discourage this approach, since electronic letters can be
distributed far more effectively to the hiring managers.  However, if you
wish, please see http://www.research.att.com/academic/Addresses.html
for information on the proper address to use for various purposes.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Finally, a word about the position for which the student has applied:

This student has applied for a summer internship.
We hire summer interns roughly from the third year of undergraduate
work through graduate school.  The summer projects vary in level,
depending on the student involved.  The students normally work in
a one-on-one fashion with a member of staff on some facet of the
ongoing research work in the lab, but they are expected to function
somewhat independently after an initial period of familiarization
with the work.  Accordingly, we are interested in information you
may have as to the student's adaptability, ability to learn new
material, and to work effectively with minimal supervision.

Thank you in advance for your cooperation.

Ken Lyons,
AT&T Labs Web Resume Database


---------------------- Forwarded by Jefferson D Sorenson/HOU/ECT on
07/05/2000 04:58 PM ---------------------------

Bob Klein
07/05/2000 04:57 PM
To: Jefferson D Sorenson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Rebecca Ford/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: UNIFY TO SAP INTERFACES

We interfaced UNIFY to SAP three times today. Interface number one (8:40 AM)
was error free. The second interface (Noon) created duplicate invoices for
those sent in our first interface. The problem that caused the duplication
was that the flag in UNIFY that prevents invoices from being sent to SAP
after they have already been interfaced did not work. The problem was
corrected before out third interface at 3:15 PM. In the 3:15 interface, one
error occurred --- a counterparty was set up in Global as intercompany that
should be third party. This error will be corrected before our next interface
on 7/6 AM.

Overall, I was pleased at how well the interfaces worked today and how fast
the SAP and UNIFY teams responded to our issues.

Bob


Good news, even better when it happens.  My contract at CES, Brian Perrone,
just told me CES will pay the invoice we billed them.  They still need to
reconstruct January.

Billing
I still need to work on January capacity and sales to CES.
I found a significant amount of transport I left out of January.  I want to
fix the Feb capacity sheet and bill CES tomorrow or Fri for capacity and the
scheduling fee.
The Feb invoicing should be much cleaner and ready to go out by the 10th.


When she was hired, there was no 3rd year analyst program.  She is going to
be placed in the trading non-rotational program, as well.  In addition, she
has made well over 1million dollars trading a book on the gas floor, and has
been made our resid trader.

Jeff

Lisa Jones@ENRON
11/30/2000 01:53 PM
Sent by: Lisa Jones@ENRON
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Associates & Analysts Eligible for Promotion

Jeff,

According to our criteria, Sara is not eligible to be promoted to an
Associate at this time.  Sara would only have 20 months in the program as of
3/31/01and does not have the 2 years of relevant commercial experience prior
to Enron necessary to promote her to the Associate level.  However, Sara
could be promoted to a 3rd Year Analyst at the mid-year PRC.

Thank you,

Lisa Jones
x3-5213

Jeffrey A Shankman@ECT
11/27/2000 07:13 AM
To: Lisa Jones/NA/ENRON@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Associates & Analysts Eligible for Promotion

yes. promote brad.  also, I believe sara mulholland (analyst) is eligible,
and I would like to promote her to associate.  (when she started at enron,
the time requirement was 18 months for promotion)

Please get back to me.  Jeff

Lisa Jones@ENRON
11/22/2000 12:43 PM
Sent by: Lisa Jones@ENRON
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Associates & Analysts Eligible for Promotion

Jeffrey,

Below is a list of Analysts and/or Associates in your group who are eligible
to be nominated for promotion during the year-end PRC.  Please review and
advise if you would like to nominate any or all of them for promotion.
Please understand that a promotion is dependent upon the rating they receive
in the final PRC.  We would like to receive your feedback regarding this
information by November 27 in order to include it in the pre-rate meeting for
your business unit.

Associate to Manager
Robert Hitch

Please contact one of us if you have any questions regarding the promotion
eligibility process.  Thank you in advance for your cooperation!!

Thank you,

Lisa Jones x35213
Andrea Richards x36499
Nedre Strambler x31659


Below are the current provisions Keeley and Hertzberg are wanting to pass
into legislation (when they return from recess).  Currently, they are not
sure if all of these amendments would be wrapped up into one bill or if they
would just amend bill SB78XX while introducing a new bill SB_XX.  Working
under the assumption that they would amend bill 78XX and introduce a new one,
the following issues are a reflection of their current positions.  If they
decide to introduce one new bill than the issues below would be included into
one piece of legislation.  Please remember, these issues are only their
current thoughts and are such to change.

SoCal Debt
SB _XX
? No provision for debt.
SB 78XX (amended)
? Approximately $2.9B through corporate bond financing supported by a
Dedicated Rate Component (DRC) over a period of time sufficient to pay the
bonds (10-15 years).  Final debt amount to be established by the PUC and the
State Auditor.

Core vs. Non-Core
SB _XX
? For purposes of paying the SoCal debt, creates a Core program for consumers
with a peak demand of less than ?Kw and Non-Core customers of ?Kw or more.
They would share in the cost of SoCal debt retirement: (1) all consumers
share pro rata for the first two years, (2) Non-Core pay 100% after two years.
SB 78XX(amended)
? No Provisions.

Transmission System Purchase
SB _XX and SB 78XX
? No purchase of transmission assets.

Conservation Easements
SB _XX
? No conservation easements.
SB 78XX(amended)
? Specific conservation easements and other land arrangements described in
bill for about 24,000 acres per the Governor's MOU.

Direct Access
SB _XX
? Removes regulatory constraints on a Direct Access program effective January
1, 2002 and permits customers to buy power if there is a net short after
SoCal native generation, bilateral contracts, and DWR contracts.  Residential
and small commercial customers may use direct access from renewable energy
sources.
SB 78XX(amended)
? No provisions for Direct Access.

Ratepayer Benefit Account
SB _XX
? Deposits in the account any refunds or net cash resulting from (a) any
refunds ordered by FERC or from litigation, and (b) any positive DWR Power
Fund revenues; all to be refunded to ratepayers through either bill credits
or rate reductions in proportion to the March, 2001 PUC rate increase.
SB 78XX(amended)
? Does not create a Ratepayer Benefit Account.

Electric Supplier Claims Settlement Trust
SB _XX and SB 78XX
? Does not create a Trust or trustee to negotiate reductions.

Renewable Energy
SB _XX
? Creates a Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) to achieve a target of 10% of
all new generating capacity additions through 2010 and overall 20% of
statewide total generating capacity by 2010.  Munis have been exempted from
the RPS.
SB 78XX(amended)
? No provisions for renewable energy.


Attached is Jan Smutny Jone's Statement for the  FERC Conference on
California markets.
 - 001109_Statement of Jan Smutny..text.doc
 - Smutny..text.PDF


I didn't pick this email up until this am, and I don't have the beginnings of
the 2nd draft with me.  Will DF be in today?

Kay

From: Reagan Rorschach/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/05/2001 05:05 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: "David Fairley (E-mail 3)" <fairleyd@pipeline.com>@SMTP@enronXgate

Subject: Second Draft

Kay,

David was unable to pickup the first draft via email--I just sent it to his
house.  He should arrive in Houston sometime later tonight.  Would you please
email the second draft to him at home?  (fairleyd@pipeline.com)

Let me know if there is anything I can do to help.

Thank you,

Reagan