Thank you- as soon as I deleted the file and started talking to friends, we realized that it was probably a hoax.  Too coincidental that everyone we knew had the file.  I appreciate you sending me this information.
Julie Gibson
At 06:02 PM 10/25/2001 -0700, you wrote:
Your e-mail came to me through some mutual friend, although who it was I
can't be sure. I just wanted to let you know that the virus alert you
notified all your friends of is a hoax and those people that follow your
instructions will be deleting an important file that is part of Windows.
Please see the information below taken from the McAfee Virus Information
Library. If ever your are in doubt of a virus it's a good idea to check it
out before passing on warnings.  Just thought you'd like to know.
McAfee AVERT Labs would like to inform you of a new email HOAX.
This email message is just a HOAX. Although, the SULFNBK.EXE file may become
infected by a number of valid viruses (most commonly W32/Magistr@MM, the
details of this HOAX message are not based on actual events.
We are advising users who receive the email to delete the message and DO NOT
pass it on as this is how an email HOAX propagates.
SULFNBK.EXE is a Microsoft Windows utility that is used to restore long file
names
Below is the actual text from the message that may be received via email.
There are numerous variations on these messages.


Pierre-Philippe,

I am a Managing Director, Research.

Please, feel free to give my E-mail address.

Vince

"Pierre-Philippe Ste-Marie" <stemarie@icubed.com> on 10/28/2000 12:26:26 AM
To: <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Title

Dear Mr. Kaminski,
?
I hope I got your title right. I looked everywhere  for it and I could not
find it. In one of the numerous discussions I had with  professor Shreve
about you I remember having heard "head of research"...  probably energy, but
that I could not recall. Is this ok? Also I would like to have the title of
the conference, it is useful!
?
Finnally, there is a request for your e-mail by a  PHD student, Do you allow
me to provide this info?
?
?
Sincerely,
?
Pierre-Philippe  Ste-Marie
--------------------------------------
pstemarie.homestead.com


FYI -Sally
-----Original Message-----
From: Beck, Sally
Sent: Monday, October 1, 2001 6:27 PM
To: Rub, Jenny
Subject: In the spirit of cooperation...

John is keeping us updated on Unify production problems, which unfortunately occur rather frequently.  When he cited the reason for performance issues in his orginal e-mail message below, I asked him whether or not the Unify team was aware ahead of time that the server resynchronization was being handled during normal business hours.  Here is his response.  I bring this to your attention not to create an issue, but rather to solve one.  I know that everyone is incredibly busy, but with so many interdepencies here we have to stay closely coordinated.  I know that EOL has a dedicated member of your team who is always on point and knowledgeable about infrastructure issues that could or do touch EOL.  Is there anyone assigned from your team for a similar role with our critical operating systems?  Because of nomination deadlines and the exchange of information with external parties for Unify, it can create real exposure (dollar exposure and PR exposure) if Unify's performance is impaired.  Let me know if you can assign someone from the infrastructure team that can wear the responsiblity of staying in step with Unify.  Thanks.  --Sally
-----Original Message-----
From: Warner , John
Sent: Monday, October 1, 2001 9:20 AM
To: Beck, Sally
Subject: RE: Unify Operational Status

Unfortunately, we didn't get a notification - we played detective.

In their defense, they had tried to do the resynchronization after-hours a couple of times and it failed, so they were somewhat desperate to get this done.  Nonetheless, a phone call should have been made to our team in advance.

-----Original Message-----
From: Beck, Sally
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 9:00 AM
To: Warner , John
Subject: FW: Unify Operational Status

Thanks for the updates.  When we had the problem with the server resynchronization, did someone from the Infrastructure team alert you ahead of time that they were going to do this during normal business hours, or did you have to be the detective to determine the cause once the problem was at hand.  Let me know. Thanks. --Sally
-----Original Message-----
From: Warner , John
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 6:01 PM
To: Rao, Ramesh; Beck, Sally; Piper, Greg; Perlman, Beth; Pena, Matt; Hall, Bob M; Superty, Robert; Pickering, Mark
Subject: Unify Operational Status
Here is a summary of Unify operations for today.  My plan was to provide these reports to this audience through the end of this week, and then pick up again during next bid week.  I'll be glad to continue this type of reporting moving forward, please let me know if you are interested.  Alternatively, I could move to a weekly reporting of issues, and/or change the audience of this report.  Your feedback on the matter is appreciated.

Summary of 9/28:
?         Heavy activity in the Gas system, especially in the afternoon.  System performance dropped during the afternoon, but no downtime was experienced.
?         At just after 3:00 pm, a network server experienced problems and as a result one of our EDI servers was unable to accept new files.  No EDI files could be sent to our hub as a result.  As it turns out, the Infrastructure team was in the process of performing a critical re-synchronization on that server, and the server was unable to write new data to disk for over an hour (during re-synchronization this window is typically just a few minutes).  Infrastructure typically conducts resynchronizations after-hours, but resynchronization had failed on this box on several prior attempts, so the issue had become critical.  At 4:26 pm, the re-synchronization completed and all EDI files in the queue were processed normally, and our 5:00 pm intraday nom deadline was met.
Action Items:
o        The network servers referenced are to be decommissioned on October 5th, and will be replaced with newer more reliable servers.  This is part of a planned project within the Infrastructure team.
o        I have discussed the issue with the Infrastructure team and communicated our various intra-day processing deadlines.  They have committed to notifying the Unify team in the event future emergency-type maintenance is required during business hours.
?         On the Power side, we have caught up on all of our processing that was delayed as a result of yesterday's outage.


Tanya,
          We have checked the RiskTrac system and
(1) The spreadoption, and other,  mappings in Risktrac are correct.  ie,
E1S1B has both power(PPP) and gas(NBP) and the deltas/gammas tie out.  The
LOLP and SMP mappings all tie out.
(2) However, the UK power in Risktrac has 25TWH more of Power.  This has
something to do with the Enpower-Risktrac communication.
(3) UK-Gas positions tie out in aggregate (off by a single BcF)

For VaR discrepancies, other than positions, the following will contrbute
(1) In Risktrac power is mapped to R4 (Cinergy) while in the spreadsheet it
is US-NG.
(2) Gas-Power and EFA-EFA correlations are different.

Matthew is coordinating with Oliver and London IT to resolve the position
issues.

Naveen

Tanya Tamarchenko@ECT
01/03/2001 02:09 PM
To: Naveen Andrews/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Matthew Adams/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Rabi De/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jaesoo Lew/NA/Enron@ENRON, Vince J
Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: UK portfolios and books setup in RisktRac

Naveen and Matthew,
I started looking systematically through UK positions and corresponding VAR
numbers in the RisckRac.
I found a few inconsistencies so far.

1. The portfolio E1SB1-NBP has a book E1SB1 under it.  The sum of delta
positions for this book is
239,021,655, the sum of gamma positions is -211,031,450. VAR for the
portfolio E1SB1-NBP is zero.

The same refers to a few other portfolios, for example E1SB2-NBP, E1SB3-NBP,
E2XX1-NBP.

2. The portfolio E1SBP1-PPP also has the book E1SB1 under it. This book
contains the positions on PPPWD1
through PPPWD6 and PPPWE1 through PPPWE4.

The same refers to the other books, for example E1SB2.

This looks messy.  Can someone in RAC go over all the portfolios, all the
corresponding books and curves
in RisktRac and make sure they are set up properly?

Thank you,

Tanya.


REMINDER:

 This email is to remind you that a meeting is scheduled for Monday, October
23rd from 4:00-5:00 regarding visa issues in EB38C2.


Loan Decision:           Referred

Application Number:   725068.01

   Decision Date:       4/5/2001

Borrower Information:

   Applicant:              Don Cliff Baughman

Product Information:  Personal Loan

Special Instructions:
Your loan request has been sent to our main office for further review.
You will be notified of the decision within 24-48 hours.

PLEASE NOTE: This is not an active email account, and is only used for
returning loan decisions.  Please do not reply to this email address, as
it will not reach a recipient.


Otra mas.

Did I get that right?
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 08/29/2000 07:03
PM ---------------------------

Jeffrey Keenan@ECT
08/29/2000 06:53 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: VEPCO contact list

Kay:

Here are my vitals.

Jeffrey M. Keenan
Director
Office: 713-853-4205
Fax:  713-646-3037
Cell:  713-851-6810

Thanks,

Jeffrey

	From:  Kay Mann @ ENRON                           08/29/2000 09:01 AM

To: Reagan Rorschach/NA/Enron@Enron, John Moore/Corp/Enron@Enron, Christi L
Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Terri Austin/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
nwodka@bracepatt.com, Lloyd Will/HOU/ECT@ECT, Larry Soderquist/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Matthew F Gockerman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Herron/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mitch
Robinson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Gautam Gupta/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian
Kerrigan/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Ozzie Pagan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Heather Kroll/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey
Keenan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Herman Manis/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: VEPCO contact list

I'm going to have an updated contact list prepared.  Please email me with
your telephone, location, email address, and cell phone number, if desired.

Please let me know who should be added to this list.

If you are receiving this vis a cc, I have your information.

Thanks,

Kay


Valery,

Thanks a lot. I really appreciate a few words comfort under
these unusual circumstances.

Vince

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	vkholod1@txu.com@ENRON
Sent:	Friday, November 30, 2001 8:33 AM
To:	Kaminski, Vince J
Subject:	Please Accepts My Genuine Support

Dear Vince,

Please accept my genuine support to you and your world-leading team in view
of the recent events.

Sincerely yours,
Valery


Laurel:  I am requesting an Enron Corp. guaranty (capped at US$20 million)
for ECT Investments, Inc.  I think we can sign the outstanding confirmation.
Sara


That all sounds great to me!

I'm going out tonight and won't be back in until late most likely so I can't
call tonight.

I'll just coordinte with Nance and I'm sure that you guys will be talking.
If we don't do something Friday, then let's defintely do something next
week/end.

If you do go out of town - have a great time.  And have a good holiday!

-----Original Message-----
From: Stephanie.Panus@enron.com [mailto:Stephanie.Panus@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 9:20 AM
To: NOVAK, JENNIFER B. (JSC-SF)
Subject: RE: Hi

That sounds like fun.  We might be out of town for the weekend.  Raymond's
friend has some land about halfway between Dallas and Houston.  We were
thinking of going up Thurs night or Fri morning.  If we do go out of town,
we need to get together next week(end). Give me a call.  We'll be around
tonight.

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   "NOVAK, JENNIFER B. (JSC-SF) (NASA)"
             <jennifer.b.novak1@jsc.nasa.gov>@ENRON
   Sent:   Tuesday, November 20, 2001 5:34 PM
   To:     Panus, Stephanie
   Subject:  RE: Hi

   hey Steph - Nance and I have been emailing and are thinking of trying to
   meet somewhere on friday night.  interested?  I was thinking Black Lab
   would
   be easy and close and good if it's still a little cool outside but
   obvioulsy
   there's any number of places we could go.

   -----Original Message-----
   From: NOVAK, JENNIFER B. (JSC-SF) (NASA)
   Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 2:41 PM
   To: 'Panus, Stephanie'
   Subject: RE: Hi

   Hey Steph!

   I just got back from Italy!  Got a last minute assignment on the 7th to
   travel on the 10th and just returned on the 16th.  It was cool b/c it
   was
   Italy but a longer and less busy trip would have been better!

   How long are Nancy & Michael in town?  I'd love to meet up with yall.

   I've got to tell you that I've got this person who is visiting me this
   weekend (actually Thurs-sun).  He's been a good friend for a long time
   and I
   like him a lot. If I meet up with you guys, I may bring him along if
   that's
   alright.

   I'm going to my grandparents house for Thanksgiving.  Going to be
   strange
   b/c Todd's not there and it's going to be the thing that everyone's
   thinking
   but now saying - you know what I mean?

   My phone #s are 281-483-2241 work and 713-533-9785 home and I can't
   recall
   my cell right now.

   We need to do dinner or pre-dinner drinks (or just skip dinner) and
   bitch
   about the idiots we both work with!!!

   Let me know what's up!

   Jenn

   -----Original Message-----
   From: Panus, Stephanie [mailto:Stephanie.Panus@ENRON.com]
   Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 2:31 PM
   To: Jennifer Blume Novak (E-mail)
   Subject: Hi

   Hey, Jen,
   What's been going on?  What are you doing for Thanksgiving?  I seem to
   have missplaced your phone numbers (I'm sure if I dug through my pile of
   junk at home I would find them!).  Give me a call.  Nancey & Michael are
   going to be in town for Turkey Day.  Lots of fun going on at my office
   these days.

   Stephanie Panus
   Senior Legal Specialist
   Enron Wholesale Services
   1400 Smith Street, EB3803C
   Houston, Texas  77002
   ph:  713.345.3249
   fax:  713.646.3490
   email:  stephanie.panus@enron.com

   **********************************************************************
   This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
   and
   may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
   intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
   others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
   authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
   reply
   to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
   all
   copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
   intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence
   a
   binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
   affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not
   be
   relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
   Thank you.
   **********************************************************************


Please run the minibook requested below and forward to Ellen.

Thanks,

Errol
---------------------- Forwarded by Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron on 02/09/2001
10:56 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Larry Joe Hunter @ ECT                           02/09/2001 08:50 AM

To: Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Darron C
Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Ellen Wallumrod/NA/Enron@ENRON, Richard Deming/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: CoEnergy Trading Company

Please forward to Ellen Wallumrod the MTM valuation(mini-book) for all
CoEnergy Trading Company deals as of Dec 31, 2000.  If you can export into
excel and forward by e-mail, that would be appreciated.

Thanks,
Joe


How depressing would it be to be at EECC?

From: Kathleen Carnahan/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/24/2001 04:24 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: RE: FW: Escrow Agreement

And you know I appreciate it and am soooo glad to be over here.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Mann, Kay
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 4:22 PM
To: Carnahan, Kathleen
Subject: RE: FW: Escrow Agreement

Glad I gave you such a GLOWING review.

From: Kathleen Carnahan/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/24/2001 04:17 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Chris Booth/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:

Subject: RE: FW: Escrow Agreement

I am printing the Fee Agreement right now.  It is my understanding Marisa
Reuter is reviewing the Escrow Agreement, so I plan on calling her tomorrow
for her comments.  Then, the plan is to find out how many need to be executed
and get the ink.

Also, I am revising the Incumbency Certificate right now to be signed by
Duran, Presto and Tricoli.  Kay, I will bring for your initials in a few
minutes.

K-

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Mann, Kay
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 4:15 PM
To: Booth, Chris
Cc: Carnahan, Kathleen
Subject: Re: FW: Escrow Agreement

I've volunteered Kathleen to help process the paper.

ckm

From: Chris Booth/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/24/2001 02:12 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Ben Jacoby/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:

Subject: FW: Escrow Agreement

FYI

 -----Original Message-----
From:  "Young, Michael" <Michael.Young@northwestern.com>@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Young+2C+20Michael+22+20+3CMichael+2EYoung+40northwester
n+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 1:56 PM
To: Booth, Chris
Cc: 'margueritekahn@paulhastings.com'
Subject: Escrow Agreement

Chris, per our conversation this afternoon, this e-mail will document the
fact that, due to travel schedules, NorthWestern is unable to obtain the
necessary officer signatures for the incumbency documents requested by
Citibank as part of establishing the escrow arrangement called for under the
Letter Agreement.  You agreed that NorthWestern could complete the necessary
paperwork with Citibank on Tuesday of next week.  Thanks again for your
flexibility.

Michael J. Young
Senior Corporate Counsel
NorthWestern Corporation
125 S. Dakota Avenue
Sioux Falls, SD  57104
Fax:  605/978-2840
Phone:  605/978-2836
Cell:  605/351-4040


yep....  Also, you'll need to bring sheets and towels. I'll send directions
later ....

-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 10:24 AM
To: ttt@cpuc.ca.gov; psellers@pacbell.net
Subject: Keepin' it in the taht moh.

Hey, I've got a "devil" of an idea to try to keep our weekend from
becoming "hellish."

Should we start emailing what we need to do/get?

I can go to Rainbow on Thursday night to get staples (understanding that
there may be some speciality items that we can pick up out there, e.g.,
oysters, cowgirl creamery, knave of hearts bakery, etc.

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Done.

D

	Enron North America Corp.  From:  Megan Parker @ ENRON                           03/26/2001 11:14 AM

To:	Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:	Duke Energy Field 7/00

We are finally closing another month.  Please change the demand fee on deal 157278 for July 2000 from $33,239.39 to $22,159.22.

Thanks,
Megan


Hi

Can you make sure we sent a copy of the Newport presentation to him.  Thanks
----- Forwarded by Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT on 05/14/2001 09:49 AM -----

	"Kazue Tabo" <tabo@xf6.so-net.ne.jp> 05/11/2001 01:49 PM 	   To: <Elizabeth.sager@enron.com>  cc:   Subject: About your presentation in EEI workshop

Dear Ms. Sager,

This is one of the attendance of EEI Power Marketing Transactions workshop  on April 18, 19.
Thank you for your presentation, it was very helpful to me and I  really enjoyed it.
I asked you to send me the documents of your presentation ( your first  presentation on April 18)
by mail or e-mail, and you said you would do that.
I know you are so busy, but if it's possible, would you kindly  send them by mail or e-mail below?
I look forward to your kind reply.

Sincerely,

Kazue Tabo

******************************************
  KAZUE   TABO
  Japan Electric Power Information Center. Inc.
   Washington Office
  1120 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.
  Suite  1070
  Washington, D.C. 20036 U.S.A.
  TEL:  (202)955-5610
  FAX: (202)955-5612
  e-mail: tabo@xf6.so-net.ne.jp
******************************************


We will need to have this call @ 2:00 PM (CDT).  Sorry for all the changes.

Date:		Monday, November 5

Time:		2:00 PM (CDT)

Number:	1-800-283-1805

Ginger Dernehl
Administrative Coordinator
Global Government Affairs
Phone# 713-853-7751
Fax# 713-646-8160

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dernehl, Ginger
Sent:	Friday, November 02, 2001 8:24 AM
To:	Alamo, Joseph; Allegretti, Daniel; Allen, Joe; Alvarez, Ray; Ausenhus, Kara; Barnes, Lynnette; Bellas, Kirsten; Binns, Darran; Bolton, Scott; Boston, Roy; Buerger, Rubena; Burns, Stephen; Canovas, Guillermo; Cantrell, Rebecca W.; Comnes, Alan; Connor, Joe; Cooney, Carolyn; Dasovich, Jeff; Decker, Larry; Dernehl, Ginger; Dressler, Jean; Floris, Vinio; Frank, Robert; Fromer, Howard; Fulton, Donna; Gottfredson, Bryan; Guerrero, Janel; Hamilton, Allison; Hardy Jr, John; Hartfield, Rita; Hawkins, Bernadette; Hemstock, Robert; Hetrick, Nancy; Hoatson, Tom; Hueter, Barbara A.; Hunter, Bevin; Huson, Margaret; Ibrahim, Amr; Kaufman, Paul; Kean, Steven J.; Keene, Patrick; Kingerski, Harry; Kishigami, Kikumi; Knight, Laurie; Landwehr, Susan M.; Lassere, Donald; Lawner, Leslie; Lawrence, Linda L.; Leibman, Lara; Leonardo, Sam; Levy, Alberto; Lindberg, Susan; Linnell, Elizabeth; Long, Chris; Mara, Susan; Maurer, Luiz; McVicker, Maureen; Migden, Janine; Miller, Terri; Montovano, Steve; Moore, Bill; Nersesian, Carin; Neustaedter, Robert; Nicolay, Christi L.; Nord, Sue; Noske, Linda J.; Novosel, Sarah; O'connell, Earlene; Ogenyi, Gloria; Palmer, Germain; Perez, Carmen; Perez, Gus; Perrino, Dave; Petrochko, Mona L.; Pharms, Melinda; Reyna, Margo; Rishe, Frank; Rizzo, Helen; Roan, Michael; Robertson, Linda; Robinson, Marchris; Rodriquez, Andy; Ryall, Jean; Shapiro, Richard; Shelk, John; Shortridge, Pat; Staines, Dan; Steffes, James D.; Stephens, Sharonda; Stransky, Joan; Stroup, Kerry; Stubbings, Randy; Sullivan, Kathleen; Sullivan, Lora; Thome, Jennifer; Tiberi, Fino; Twiggs, Thane; Walton, Steve; Warner, Geriann; Yeung, Charles; Yoho, Lisa
Subject:	ANOTHER CHANGE:   Department Conference Call

Rick has been called away to meetings this morning, so we are rescheduling this call for Monday, November 5 @ 10:30 AM (CDT).  Same dial number (as below) will apply for this call.

Ginger Dernehl
Administrative Coordinator
Global Government Affairs
Phone# 713-853-7751
Fax# 713-646-8160

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dernehl, Ginger
Sent:	Tuesday, October 30, 2001 4:13 PM
To:	Alamo, Joseph; Allegretti, Daniel; Allen, Joe; Alvarez, Ramon; Ausenhus, Kara; Barnes, Lynnette; Bellas, Kirsten; Binns, Darran; Bolton, Scott; Boston, Roy; Buerger, Rubena; Burns, Stephen; Canovas, Guillermo; Cantrell, Rebecca W.; Comnes, Alan; Connor, Joe; Cooney, Carolyn; Dasovich, Jeff; Decker, Larry; Dernehl, Ginger; Dressler, Jean; Floris, Vinio; Frank, Robert; Fromer, Howard; Fulton, Donna; Gottfredson, Bryan; Guerrero, Janel; Hamilton, Allison; Hardy Jr, John; Hartfield, Rita; Hawkins, Bernadette; Hemstock, Robert; Hetrick, Nancy; Hoatson, Tom; Hueter, Barbara A.; Hunter, Bevin; Huson, Margaret; Ibrahim, Amr; Kaufman, Paul; Kean, Steven J.; Keene, Patrick; Kingerski, Harry; Kishigami, Kikumi; Knight, Laurie; Landwehr, Susan M.; Lassere, Donald; Lawner, Leslie; Lawrence, Linda L.; Leibman, Lara; Leonardo, Sam; Levy, Alberto; Lindberg, Susan; Linnell, Elizabeth; Long, Chris; Mara, Susan; Maurer, Luiz; McVicker, Maureen; Migden, Janine; Miller, Terri; Montovano, Steve; Moore, Bill; Nersesian, Carin; Neustaedter, Robert; Nicolay, Christi L.; Nord, Sue; Noske, Linda J.; Novosel, Sarah; O'connell, Earlene; Ogenyi, Gloria; Palmer, Germain; Perez, Carmen; Perez, Gus; Perrino, Dave; Petrochko, Mona L.; Pharms, Melinda; Reyna, Margo; Rishe, Frank; Rizzo, Helen; Roan, Michael; Robertson, Linda; Robinson, Marchris; Rodriquez, Andy; Ryall, Jean; Shapiro, Richard; Shelk, John; Shortridge, Pat; Staines, Dan; Steffes, James D.; Stephens, Sharonda; Stransky, Joan; Stroup, Kerry; Stubbings, Randy; Sullivan, Kathleen; Sullivan, Lora; Thome, Jennifer; Tiberi, Fino; Twiggs, Thane; Walton, Steve; Warner, Geriann; Yeung, Charles; Yoho, Lisa
Subject:	CHANGE:   Department Conference Call

The department call has been postponed to Friday because additional update information is expected in the next few days.  This will give Rick the opportunity to relay all updated information received this week.  The call will now take place on Friday, November 2.  See below for all details.

Ginger Dernehl
Administrative Coordinator
Global Government Affairs
Phone# 713-853-7751
Fax# 713-646-8160

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dernehl, Ginger
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 4:53 PM
To:	Alamo, Joseph; Allegretti, Daniel; Allen, Joe; Alvarez, Ramon; Ausenhus, Kara; Barnes, Lynnette; Bellas, Kirsten; Binns, Darran; Bolton, Scott; Boston, Roy; Buerger, Rubena; Burns, Stephen; Canovas, Guillermo; Cantrell, Rebecca W.; Comnes, Alan; Connor, Joe; Cooney, Carolyn; Dasovich, Jeff; Decker, Larry; Dernehl, Ginger; Dressler, Jean; Floris, Vinio; Frank, Robert; Fromer, Howard; Fulton, Donna; Gottfredson, Bryan; Guerrero, Janel; Hamilton, Allison; Hardy Jr, John; Hartfield, Rita; Hawkins, Bernadette; Hemstock, Robert; Hetrick, Nancy; Hoatson, Tom; Hueter, Barbara A.; Hunter, Bevin; Huson, Margaret; Ibrahim, Amr; Kaufman, Paul; Kean, Steven J.; Keene, Patrick; Kingerski, Harry; Kishigami, Kikumi; Knight, Laurie; Landwehr, Susan M.; Lassere, Donald; Lawner, Leslie; Lawrence, Linda L.; Leibman, Lara; Leonardo, Sam; Levy, Alberto; Lindberg, Susan; Linnell, Elizabeth; Long, Chris; Mara, Susan; Maurer, Luiz; McVicker, Maureen; Migden, Janine; Miller, Terri; Montovano, Steve; Moore, Bill; Nersesian, Carin; Neustaedter, Robert; Nicolay, Christi L.; Nord, Sue; Noske, Linda J.; Novosel, Sarah; O'connell, Earlene; Ogenyi, Gloria; Palmer, Germain; Perez, Carmen; Perez, Gus; Perrino, Dave; Petrochko, Mona L.; Pharms, Melinda; Reyna, Margo; Rishe, Frank; Rizzo, Helen; Roan, Michael; Robertson, Linda; Robinson, Marchris; Rodriquez, Andy; Ryall, Jean; Shapiro, Richard; Shelk, John; Shortridge, Pat; Staines, Dan; Steffes, James D.; Stephens, Sharonda; Stransky, Joan; Stroup, Kerry; Stubbings, Randy; Sullivan, Kathleen; Sullivan, Lora; Thome, Jennifer; Tiberi, Fino; Twiggs, Thane; Walton, Steve; Warner, Geriann; Yeung, Charles; Yoho, Lisa
Subject:	Department Conference Call

Per Rick's promise on last Friday's conference call, he will hold another general update call as follows:

Date:		Wednesday, October 31  Friday, November 2

Time:		10:30 AM (CDT)

Number:	1-800-283-1805

Location:	ECN 4701(for those in Houston)

Thanks!

Ginger Dernehl
Administrative Coordinator
Global Government Affairs
Phone# 713-853-7751
Fax# 713-646-8160


----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 10/06/2000 05:04 PM -----

	"Fergus, Gary S." <GFergus@brobeck.com>
	10/06/2000 04:58 PM

		 To: "'Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com'" <Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com>,
"'msmith1@enron.com'" <msmith1@enron.com>, "'David_Aamodt@pgn.com'"
<David_Aamodt@pgn.com>, "'MBD'" <MDay@GMSSR.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: Enron Proposals Regarding Document Subpoenas

Here is your copy of the final version sent to the Commission.
Thanks
Gary

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fergus, Gary S.
> Sent: Friday, October 06, 2000 2:57 PM
> To: 'hym@cpuc.ca.gov'
> Cc: 'MBD'
> Subject: Enron Proposals Regarding Document Subpoenas
> Importance: High
>
> Harvey Morris Esq.
> California Public Utilities Commission
> 505 Public Utilities Commission
> San Francisco, California   94102
>
>  Re:   I.00-08-002  Subpoenas Served on Enron Power Marketing, Inc.
> ("EPMI"), Enron Energy Services Operations Inc. and Enron Energy Services
> Inc. (collectively referred to as "EES"), Enron Energy Marketing
> Corporation ("EEMC"), and Portland General Electric Corporation ("Portland
> General")(collectively sometimes referred to as the "Enron Entities")
>
> Harvey,
>
>  Here are our proposals with respect to the Enron Entities'
> production of documents pursuant to the above described subpoenas issued
> by the California Public Utility Commission (hereinafter "the
> Commission").  The Enron Entities are willing to assist the Commission in
> undertaking its investigation into the problems in the California electric
> markets by producing the information specified on a timely basis.  We
> believe that the production we propose will enable the Commission to
> commence its investigation much sooner than if the parties were forced to
> litigate all of the potential objections to the requests for production,
> which are, by any standard, extremely broad and could involve millions of
> pages of documents.  We make these proposals pursuant to our email
> exchange of October 3, 2000 with the understanding that the Commission
> agrees that by cooperating, offering to produce or producing documents,
> the Enron Entities have not waived any objections or challenges to these
> subpoenas whatsoever and that any claims, defenses, objections,
> jurisdictional or otherwise or other responses have been specifically
> reserved and can be raised in the future, if necessary.   For all of these
> proposals, we exclude documents that are protected from disclosure by the
> attorney client and attorney work product privileges.
>
>  Generally speaking, the Enron Entities propose to produce documents
> for year 2000 as noted below.  We also understand that the Commission will
> be obtaining documents from the ISO and PX and we will not attempt here to
> duplicate documents that we understand will be produced by those entities.
> As you will see in the general documents that are offered here for
> production, Enron Energy Services Operations, Inc. is the parent of Enron
> Energy Services, Inc. and does not have operating authority or engage in
> wholesale or retail purchases or sales of energy.  Thus, the documents
> offered here with respect to those two entities originates with Enron
> Energy Services, Inc. but we have designated them both as EES.  We also do
> not propose to offer duplicative documents as between the Enron Entities.
>
> GENERAL DOCUMENTS
> Requests 1 through 4
>
>  Because of the dynamic nature of the Enron Entities' businesses, the
> burden and expense on them to locate, and produce every corporate
> organizational chart anywhere in their organizations since April 1, 1998
> is significant.   The Enron Entities will provide the Commission with
> exemplars of their current organizational charts, telephone directories
> and so called "family trees" to show its current organization.  To the
> extent that the Enron Entities can readily identify and locate exemplars
> of significant organizational charts, telephone directories or so called
> "family trees" for earlier periods they will also make those available.
> One Enron Entity, Portland General, has published books on its corporate
> history.  If a list of those books would be helpful, we can provide it.
> With respect to the other Enron Entities, to the extent that corporate
> histories can be found, they will be produced.  We anticipate producing
> these documents in the first wave on October 13, 2000.
>
> Requests 5 and 6
>
>  The Enron Entities propose that their responses to Requests 1-4 will
> identify their relationship to affiliated companies and the Transaction
> Documents will identify its customers and suppliers.  We believe this
> information will be sufficient to illustrate these relationships for the
> staff's purposes.
>
> FINANCIAL DOCUMENTS
> Requests 7 through 11
>
>  The Enron Entities will produce their public filings for the period
> requested with respect to financial data.  EPMI, EES, and Portland General
> will provide to the Commission electronic transaction data ( the
> "Transaction Documents") for the purchase and sale of energy delivered
> which information includes economic data.   We anticipate producing public
> filings regarding financial data on October 13, 2000 and the electronic
> Transaction Documents in the second wave of document productions.
>
> GENERATING DOCUMENTS
> Requests 12, 14 and 18
>
>  For the Enron Entities other than Portland General, the generation
> facilities are either non-existent or limited in number and there will
> probably be limited documents available.  The Enron Entities to the extent
> they act as a scheduling coordinator or possessed the right to use or
> resell generation output, do not have the specific documents that pertain
> to each generation unit requested.  The Enron Entities, other than
> Portland General, do have documents and information for Las Vegas
> Cogeneration.  We propose to produce these documents in the second wave of
> document productions.
>
>   For Portland General, the production of the requested documents
> would involve a tremendous volume of documents, as Portland General owned
> twenty generating facilities of a variety of types and sizes during 2000.
> Portland General is a net importer of energy and can only generate about
> one half of its total energy demand.  As a result, we question whether the
> effort required of Portland General is warranted as its impact on the
> California wholesale market is necessarily limited.  Nevertheless,
> Portland General proposes to provide for year 2000 electronic Transaction
> Documents in summary form similar to the data being provided by other
> Enron Entities, to the extent relevant as discussed below.  We propose
> that the Commission defer requesting production of other information until
> it has reviewed the information of generators who sell a significant
> proportion of their energy into the California market.  At that time a
> more accurate assessment can be made of whether this enormous effort will
> be valuable given the limited impact of Portland General generation on the
> California wholesale market.
>
> TRANSACTION DOCUMENTS
> Requests 13, 15, 16, 17 and 19
>
>  We understand that the Commission will be obtaining trading data for
> the purchase and sale of energy delivered in California from the ISO and
> PX.  EPMI can provide the Commission several different sets of relevant
> transaction data for year 2000 (in California and outside of California
> and Real Time) for the purchase and sale of energy delivered with the
> date, counterparty, quantity, delivery point, hours, price, and whether it
> is a purchase or a sale.   Because of the speed with which you want this
> information, it is possible that some entries will be incomplete or
> inaccurate.  For those
> transactions where EPMI served only as the scheduling coordinator, we
> understand that the ISO will show part of the transaction, but there will
> not be a corresponding transaction in the EPMI data we can provide
> quickly.  The reason is that this type of transaction is passed through to
> EPMI's customer on an accounting system rather than as part of the trading
> business.  EES can also provide similar data with respect to relevant
> wholesale and retail transactions with the proviso that with respect to
> retail transactions it will not include the specific names of its retail
> customers but instead will provide a blind customer number due to EES'
> confidentiality obligations to those customers.  We anticipate producing
> the Transaction Documents in the second wave of document productions.
>
> FERC DOCUMENTS
>
> Request 20
>
>  The Enron Entities will produce the requests for data they received
> from FERC and to the extent that FERC has been given responses, copies of
> those responses.  We anticipate producing the FERC documents on October
> 13, 2000.
>
>
>  Based upon discussions that we have had with the various Enron
> Entities, we believe that we could make a second wave of productions on
> Friday October 27, 2000.  It is possible that not all Enron Entities could
> make that date but we believe the bulk of the data could be available for
> production by then.
>
>  We propose to make these productions with the understanding that if
> any entity obtains a more stringent protective order than the one
> currently in place, that all of the Enron Entities document productions
> will be protected by the most stringent protective order.  In addition,
> if, at the request of any party or nonparty to this proceeding, the
> Commission or a court of competent jurisdiction orders that the requests
> for production be limited, reduced or eliminated, the Enron Entities
> reserve the right to limit the production of documents in conformance with
> such order.
>
>  We understand that you will consider these proposals and let us know
> if they are acceptable to the Commission.  If you have any questions or
> comments about our proposal, please do not hesitate to contact Michael Day
> or myself.
>
> Brobeck Phleger & Harrison LLP
>
> Gary Fergus
>
>
>
>
>

=======================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of
the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to
postmaster@brobeck.com
BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP
http://www.brobeck.com


Rick,
Here's a draft DASH for the Enron Oil & Gas India Ltd. divestiture which will be discussed in a conference call Wednesday between you, Skilling, Detmering and Sherrick.  Larson and Gorte have reviewed.
Regards,
Steve

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Harper, Stephen
Sent:	Tuesday, August 07, 2001 1:56 PM
To:	Larson, Bradford; Gorte, David
Cc:	Sherrick, Jeffrey; Detmering, Timothy J.
Subject:	Divest DASH
Importance:	High
Sensitivity:	Confidential

Detmering/Sherrick deal terms included.  Plan is for Rick Buy to take to a Wednesday morning conference call with Skilling.


Bill:  I am looking foward to the game!  I will try to walk over to your
offices by 6:00.  Mark


Bad news girls:

I just got a call from Pam's secretary who let me know that Pam's brother
Russ was killed in a car accident last week.  Pam and I were supposed to
have lunch this week and she called to fill me in.  I don't know many of the
details yet because her secretary did not know much.

Apparently they are having a military service in Seattle and they will
probably bury him in Texas since Pam's parents are moving to Texas soon.  I
don't know when the service in Texas will be.

Please keep her in your thoughts and prayers because I know that this is
going to be terribly hard for her.  She and Russ were very close.

I'll fill you in as soon as I know more,

Thanks,
Karen

Karen K. Fitzgerald
KIeiman, Lawrence, Baskind & Fitzgerald, LLP
4849 Greenville Avenue, Suite 1605
Dallas, TX 75206
214.265.9958
214.265.7411 (fax)
karenfitzgerald@bigfoot.com

This e-mail contains PRIVILEGED ATTORNEY-CLIENT communications.  If you are
not one of the intended recipients, please immediately delete or destroy all
copies or versions you have of this message and notify the sender at
214.265.9958 or karenfitzgerald@bigfoot.com in order that we may take steps
to prevent any further inadvertent disclosure.


Todd,

Your welcome to come by at your convience, just give me a call to make sure I'm home.  I usually get home from work around 7:30pm.  I can be reached at 249-8322, and if your coming by my address is 4712 Grove Hill Rd. SW.  (This is just off 17th Avenue and 45th Street SW.)

Regards,

Jon

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Todd Renneberg" <t-renneberg@home.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Todd+20Renneberg+22+20+3Ct-renneberg+40home+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Saturday, July 28, 2001 11:12 AM
To:	Mckay, Jonathan
Subject:

Jon, my brother mark said you have a 27" Hitachi  for sale. If nobody has bought it yet I would like to come by and have a look at  it.  I can be reached during the day at the number below or in the evening  at 270-0426.

Regards,

Todd  Renneberg
Relizon
Phone:    (403) 259-0054 ext.  285
Fax:         (403)  253-5282


This is another reason why the HR and A/A program don't like each other.
It's absurd that our personnell functions don't share resources.  I'm almost
of the opinion that these two groups should be folded together.

Jeff
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 10/04/2000
05:58 PM ---------------------------
From: Suzanne Farrow@EES on 10/04/2000 04:45 PM
To: Kristin Gandy/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Wharton Interviews

Kate Wagner (Thunderbird) was supposed to have been taken off this list

The list was also supposed to have been updated 2 months ago to reflect that
Neville Ravji, Tiffany Wright, and Ben Creighton have left the company.
Betsy Bassis and Steve Pirozzi are physically located in London.

Are you sure you're pulling from the most up-to-date list?

Suzanne

Kristin Gandy@ENRON
10/04/2000 03:56 PM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael J Popkin/NA/Enron@Enron, Peggy
Determeyer/Corp/Enron@Enron, Laura Howenstine/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Bryan Kite/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Michele
Nezi Marvin/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Neville Ravji/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Suzanne Farrow/HOU/EES@EES, Sarah
Wesner/Corp/Enron@Enron, Patrick Conner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jayshree
Desai/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Dutta/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matthew Goering/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Kenneth Horton/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kathleen
Wagner/NA/Enron@Enron, Betsy Bassis/CA/Enron@Enron, Lisa
Connolly/NA/Enron@Enron, Ben Creighton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Brad
Hitch/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Colin Jackson/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Gillian Johnson/NA/Enron@Enron, William
Keeney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jebong Lee/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Stephen Pirozzi/LON/ECT@ECT, cwang2@enron.com, Tiffany Wright/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Rodney Malcolm/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer
Fraser/HOU/ECT@ECT, John L Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kyle Kitagawa/CAL/ECT@ECT,
Natalie Halich/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Sean A
Holmes/HOU/EES@EES, Jordan Mintz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Li Sun/NA/Enron@Enron, Teresa
Dyar/NA/Enron@Enron, Kyu-Bong Lee/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Wharton Interviews

Hello Wharton/Penn Team!

Can you believe interviews are just around the corner.

So that we are fully prepared for the November 9th and 10th interviews dates
a team meeting will be held on:

Monday October 9th at 2:00pm in room 11C2

In the meeting we will review resumes that have been received for our
pre-select list and coordinate any further campus events. Also, in the
meeting we will select the people who will conduct first and second round
interviews.  So if you would like to interview please plan on attending this
meeting.   I look forward to seeing you all there.

Thank You,

Kristin Gandy
Associate Recruiter
Associate/Analyst Program
713-345-3214


test
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 03/02/2001 11:51 AM -----

	Susan J Mara
	03/02/2001 10:44 AM

		 To: Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Christopher F
Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, David Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT, Laird Dyer/SF/ECT@ECT, Tim
Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: ABX1 70 Further Nail in Generator's Coffin -- Absurdity in CA

I just heard about this bill by La Seur

ABX1 70 attempts to criminalize acts of unregulated generators if they
perform maintenance at times other than the California Public Utilities
Commission requires. Further, the commission is required to allow scheduled
maintenance of only one generator at a time.
So, with 500 generators in the state, just how  many years would it take to
complete one round of maintenance?  Also, please note it does not apply to
munis.

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854


We have re-drafted various sections of this to incorporate Steve's comments.
So I think we are finally there.

What's next??

Seabron

This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the
addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or
confidential information.  If you are not the intended recipient of this
e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly
prohibited.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify me at
(617) 354-0060 and permanently delete the original and any copy of any
e-mail and any printout thereof.

Seabron Adamson
Frontier Economics Inc
Two Brattle Square
Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
Ph:  (617) 354-0060
Fax: (617) 354-0640
seabron.adamson@frontier-economics.com

www.frontier-economics.com

 - 01-07-07-SA Draft policy paper - revised.doc


Scotty and I will be in nyc.

Cameron

--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld

-----Original Message-----
From: Nancy Sellers <Nancy.Sellers@RobertMondavi.com>
To: 'Eldon Sellers' <Eldon@direcpc.com>; Cameron <cameron@perfect.com>; Jeff
Dasovich <Jeff_Dasovich@enron.com>; Prentice @ Berkeley
<PSellers@haas.berkeley.edu>; Prentice Sellers <PSellers@pacbell.net>; Scott
Laughlin <scottwl@hotmail.com>
Sent: Fri Oct 19 08:44:34 2001
Subject: Herring

Mike & Lisa's last Niner game is Nov 4.  I thought we might want to see if
we could all get tickets and throw them a little going away tailgate party -
what do you think??

Nancy
(707) 251-4870 (phone)
(707) 265-5446 (fax)
"Plus je bois, mieux je chante"


FYI..Jeff
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 06/22/2000
07:47 AM ---------------------------

From:  Ted Murphy
06/21/2000 05:43 PM

To: Rick Buy, John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jeffrey A
Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Factor Loadings

I hope that the following clears up some of the  confusion regarding the
above-captioned process.

Factor loadings are an input to Value-at-Risk (VAR).  Generally, you can
consider them the determinants of relationships between curves,and points on
curves based on trader inputs.   These pertain to all curves not just North
American Natural Gas.  There is a specific program which calculates these
relationships which requires a considerable amount of processing time (3
hours per run) as well as another few man-days to evaluate the results.

There is no "ideal" or recommended period in which these must be updated.
More frequent is "better".  Given the amount of time it takes to refresh, it
was "agreed" a long time ago amongst  RAC, Research, IT and Operations that
it would be done every 2 weeks.  No commercial input was received.  The roles
were to be simple as they are with most roles in and around VAR and other
risk management controls:

 Research specifies the math
 IT codes the program
 Operations runs the program
 RAC evaluates the results

The process has been run every two weeks on the second Thursday of every
month since February (as it had been prior) and RAC has rejected the results
because the results did not reflect the underlying math because of the
complexity of the math and the continuing addition of new products and
curves.  This  created the need to recode the application from scratch.   RAC
continued to agitate to get this done, particularly knowing that the pressure
on the efficacy of VAR would be questioned as we went into the volatile
period of 2000 ( e-mails from Rudi Zipter available upon request).  The new
code was implemented last Thursday and the results were accepted resulting in
an approximate 10% difference in VAR.

RAC had requested that the code be re-written on 6/10/99 @ 7:44 am with a
target completion date of  8/2/99.  This was discussed and accepted by
Phillipe Bibi on 6/17/99 in a meeting in his conference room with Rick Buy,
Dan Bruce, Jonathon Le, Ted Murphy, Bill Bradford, Debbie Brackett and Rudi
Zipter along with the rest of our task list.

We have resolved that the process will continue as stated and will
communicate to you the results.

There are dozens of other processes that are important to the calculation and
interpretation of VAR that need to be implemented, enhanced, improved or
rewritten altogether.  For example, the jump-diffusion factors for North
American Power have not been refreshed in 2000.  The prioirty is dependent on
the level of precision required.

I will provide a comprehensive list of those processes in due course.

Ted


Start Date: 1/23/02; HourAhead hour: 16;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002012316.txt


In that case, it's just the SoCalGas core procurement charge (including
brokerage fee -- e.g. their March price was $7.404/dth) that we need to be
comparable to or beat.  We have more control over the transmission rates so
the
price from Enron we are looking for is just for the commodity at the border.
I'll provide you with our monthly WACOG that customers are charged as the
commodity portion of their bill versus SoCalGas' core procurement charge.
I'll
be sending you the data today.

Kim.Ward@enron.com wrote:

> Bonnie,
>
> Sorry I am just now getting back - I was out of the office Thurs & Fri.
> What I am trying to determine is the rate that Long Beach wants to beat and
> what it is made up of - so I would say both transmission and commodity
> prices.  Let me know if you have any more questions -
>
> Thanks,
>
> Kim Ward
> 713-853-0685
>
> "Bonnie Ying" <boying@ci.long-beach.ca.us> on 03/22/2001 05:10:21 PM
>
> To:   Kim.Ward@enron.com
> cc:   Chris Garner <chgarne@ci.long-beach.ca.us>, Cynthia Gonzales
>       <cygonza@ci.long-beach.ca.us>
> Subject:  Request for Information
>
> Kim, just a clarification on the last question of your data request --
>
> By historical retail rates vs. SoCal's rates, do you mean the
> transmission rates or the commodity prices?


No Failures


Hello, Mr. Lay, I thoroughly enjoyed the awards luncheon today, and I
understand this was your treat to us for having done such a good job.  I'm so
proud to have been a part of this, and have one more thing to brag on about
Enron to family and friends.  I hope you and your loved ones have a great
holiday season.

Sincerely,
Regina Karsolich
Enron Net Works LLC


Andy & Dave

This is to update you on a few meetings I have had and update you on my activities.

Last week I met with:
Neste Petroelum - Their US Activities are not very applicable, but they are the Finnish National Oil Company and the trader I met with felt there may be some application with their physical European business.  They are a big producer of "clean" gasoline and diesel that goes into the EU.  He is going to supply an appropriate contact.

Martin Resources - This is a medium size private company and the result of this meeting beyond general market intelligence was a possible interest in showing one market for sulfuric acid, which is a market where they have a Gulf Coast franchise.  My contact who is one of the owners and he will revert after having interanl discussions

Enterprise - This meeting got postpones until this coming Friday due to a crisis they had.  I did spend a little time with Monty Wells (I think that was his names)  who is the SVP incharge of the NGL's.  I only presented the idea briefly for him tho think about.  My meeting on Friday is with Jim Teague, President & CEO of Enterprise NGL division.

Tauber - Tauber is a medium sized trading company with $1 Billion in Revenues.  they are active in Petrochemicals, NGL, Refined Products, and heavy oils.  There was an interest and Tauber is an active EOL user and fan.  My contact Scott Posednik runs the Petrochemical book and his biggest deal breaker was the security of the transaction information.  He indicated the 1% chance that one of the EOL people with access to their data could share that with the commercial groups is a concern.  He is going to discuss this with his colleagues and come back to us with their interest.  They do a lot of trading in physical Raffinates, Naphtha, etc.

Koch Hydrocarbons - This meeting was well timed as they are actively looking at their e-commerce startegy.  I met with Mark Dobbins SVP -Trading and Ron Baker who runs their Olephins and NGL books.  Their biggest hurdle is going to be getting comfortable making markets.  Another issue will how the credit matrix works.  It appears if they did something that they might need something a little more sophistacated than the basic offering.  One final issue will be the reps and warranties made by Enron contractually as to the sharing of information with our business groups and the security of the data.  They have apparently had an ordeal negotiating their master agreements to transact on EnronOnline and are warry of Enron's contracts.   They are going to have some internal discussions and revert next week.

Shell Us Trading (SUSCO) - I had a very good conversation with Steven Murray and he was supposed to get back with me early this week about setting up a meeting.  The boundries have been established that our interest would be in their making markets for Oil, Petrochemicals, NGLs and Chemicals only.  Gas and Power are currently out of bounds.

This week
I am Vancouver today and tommorrow attending a Wood products conference and I will be in Las Vegas on Thursday.  After thoroughly reviewing the pulp and paper industry I think that the only sectors that would easily fit into this model will be the waste paper and lumber. I have had and will have discussion with other producers, but they are still hung up on branding and their products not being commodities ect.  I am Vancouver and have several meetings together with the Rob Scheuer with lumber producers about showing offers.  In Las Vegas, there is a conference where Ray Bowen is the keynote speaker and there are several potential counterparties attending , including Waste Management.  My intent is not to spend too much time on Pulp and Paper and these two trips will allow me to quickly determine who the possible prospects are.

Leave me a message at x36413 if you have any questions or comments


There are some conflicts with the draft date, so we will probably need to
have it on a different date.  Please tell me if you prefer 9/2 ( the day
before the season starts) or 8/20.  We could also do it during the week, but
it will probably takle 3 or 4 hrs.

Let me know suggestions.


I spoke to Aquila again today.  They are planning to submit bids on Friday
for Gleason, Wheatland and Pastoria.  They already have a tolling agreement
in the Lincoln area and don't want more capacity there.

Aquila's question:

They questioned the development costs for Pastoria - look very high.  I
noted that it includes the ERC's.  They would like a breakout of the
development costs

PG&E's question is below.  Are you comfortable disclosing this at this stage
or is this a phase II due diligence item?

-----Original Message-----
From: Favinger, Thomas [mailto:thomas.favinger@neg.pge.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2000 5:17 PM
To: 'Iaconetti, Louis'
Subject: RE: Responses to PG&E Questions on Pastoria

Since we do not have to accept the NEPCO contract, can you break out the
cost and scope of equipment (Enron uses the term "power islands")?  Can we
get this information tomorrow?  Both cost and scope of this is important to
be able to assess the "EPC" price and determine bid price.


?
----- : Click and go to http://www.enerfax.com if can not view  properly.htm

?
[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]
																					[IMAGE]

														[IMAGE]

																			Click here for  a daily email link

																Enerfax Daily

																												[IMAGE]

																										[IMAGE]

																																	[IMAGE]
																											[IMAGE]

																								Looking  for a past article or issue. Click here to use Sagewave's  Search.

																							Enerfax  Daily? -? Page  ? -? November 8, 2000

																													[IMAGE]

																											[IMAGE]

																												Enerfax  Daily? -?  Page 4? -?  November 8, 2000 -? ?  Past  Issues Available
on Sagewave

																														[IMAGE]
																												[IMAGE]

																																		[IMAGE]
																												[IMAGE]
																															[IMAGE]
																															[IMAGE]

																									Baker Hughes October 2000 Rig Counts

																									?

																									?  ? Baker Hughes has announced that the international rig count  for October
2000 was 727, up 13 from September and up 162 from  October 1999. The
international offshore rig count for October 2000  was 219, up 6 from
September and up 62 from October 1999. The US rig  count for October 2000 was
1,055 up 44 from September and up 344  from October 1999. The Canadian rig
count for October 2000 was 353  up 39 from September 2000 and up 64 from
October 1999. The worldwide  rig count for October 2000 was 2,135 up 96 from
September and up 717  from October 1999.

																									October 2000  Rotary Rig Counts

																									? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?  October 2000? ? ? ? ?September 2000?  ? ? October 1999
																									? ? ? ? ?  ? ?
																									? ? ? ? ? ? ?  Land? ?OS  Total? Var? ?Land? ?OS Total?  ?Land? ?OS Total

																									Europe? ? ? ? ?39?  ?57? ? 96? ? 1? ? ?39?  ?56? ? 95? ? ?37? ?29?  ? 66
																									Middle East? ?143? ?19?  ?162? ? 4? ? 137? ?21?  ?158? ? 116? ?18? ?134
																									Africa? ? ? ? ?25? ?25?  ? 50? ? 3? ? ?25? ?22?  ? 47? ? ?25? ?13? ? 38
																									Latin America 210? ?55? ?265? ?  6? ? 207? ?52? ?259? ?  161? ?34? ?195
																									Asia Pacific?  ?91? ?63? ?154? ?(1)? ?  93? ?62? ?155? ? ?69?  ?63? ?132
																									International? 508? 219?  ?727? ?13? ? 501? 213?  ?714? ? 408? 157? ?565
																									U.S.?  ? ? ? ? 908? 147 1,055? ?44?  ? 864? 147 1,011? ? 630? 111?  ?741
																									Canada? ? ? ? 348? ?  5? ?353? ?39? ? 310? ?  4? ?314? ? 285? ? 4? ?289
																									N. America?  ?1,256? 152 1,408? ?83? 1,174? 151  1,325? ? 915? 115 1,030

																									Worldwide? ? 1,764? 371  2,135? ?96? 1,675? 364 2,039? 1,323?  272 1,595

																																[IMAGE]

																																	Enerfax  Daily? -?  Page 7? -?  November 8, 2000

																															[IMAGE]

																																Enerfax  Daily? -?  Page 8? -?  November 8, 2000

																														[IMAGE]

																										Revised Columbia Stock Proration

																										?  ? NiSource has revised the proration factor for the NiSource  and Columbia
merger, which closed on November 1st. Under the revised  calculation,
38.944476% of those Columbia shares for which valid  stock elections were
made, rounded down to the nearest whole share,  will be converted into
NiSource stock.? This number was  previously incorrectly reported as
38.8301728%.? The exchange  ratio is 3.04414 NiSource shares for each
Columbia share that is  exchanged.

																														[IMAGE]

																											Financial Summary

																																	[IMAGE]

																						")} TC
																		[IMAGE]

 - blnk.gif
 - img16.gif
 - img17.gif
 - img18.gif
 - img19.gif
 - img20.gif
 - img8.gif
 - img21.gif
 - img3.gif
 - img22.gif
 - img23.gif
 - img24.gif
 - img25.gif
 - img26.gif
 - img27.gif
 - img28.gif
 - img29.gif
 - img30.gif
 - img31.gif
 - id=1381847
 - img32.gif


I can't just sit here and write e-mails all day. I'm a busy man. I did not
mean to offend you. I had smoozing to do and didn't want to neglect our
customers.


I am pleased to announce the formation of the Enron Management Committee.  The Management Committee comprises our business unit and function leadership and will focus on the key management, strategy, and policy issues facing Enron.  The Management Committee will supplant the former Policy Committee and will include the following individuals:

Ken Lay - Chairman and CEO, Enron Corp.
Ray Bowen - COO, Enron Industrial Markets
Michael Brown - COO, Enron Europe
Rick Buy - Exec VP & Chief Risk Officer, Enron Corp.
Rick Causey - Exec VP & Chief Accounting Officer, Enron Corp.
Dave Delainey - Chairman and CEO, Enron Energy Services
Jim Derrick - Exec VP & General Counsel, Enron Corp.
Janet Dietrich - President, Enron Energy Services
Jim Fallon - President & CEO, Enron Broadband Services
Andy Fastow - Exec VP & CFO, Enron Corp.
Mark Frevert - Chairman & CEO, Enron Wholesale Services
Ben Glisan - Managing Director & Treasurer, Enron Corp.
Mark Haedicke - Managing Director & General Counsel, Enron Wholesale Services
Kevin Hannon - CEO, Enron Global Assets & Services
Stan Horton - Chairman & CEO, Enron Transportation Services
Jim Hughes - President & COO, Enron Global Assets & Services
Steve Kean - Exec. VP & Chief of Staff, Enron Corp.
Louise Kitchen - COO, Enron Americas
Mark Koenig - Exec VP, Investor Relations, Enron Corp.
John Lavorato - President & CEO, Enron Americas
Mike McConnell - President & CEO, Enron Global Markets
Jeff McMahon - President & CEO, Enron Industrial Markets
Jeff Shankman - COO, Enron Global Markets
John Sherriff - President & CEO, Enron Europe
Greg Whalley - President & COO, Enron Wholesale Services

	After we convene the Management Committee later this week, I will make a further announcement regarding the Executive Committee.


On Friday, August 4 JB and I had a discussion re: engaging Wisvest in a
dialogue to resolve some of the major issues around the San Antonio project.
In that discussion I reiterated what was discussed at the 8/2/00 Board
meeting which was:  a) we needed to finalize the numbers re: the WMI royalty
renegotiation; b) verify the expected EPC costs to complete the project; c)
revise the project pro-forma to reflect the revisions in (a) and (b) and d)
run sensitivity analyses on the level of subordination Wisvest would have to
accept in order to make the project economics viable.  In our phone
conversation on 8/4/00 we again agreed this was the right course of action to
take.  Subsequent to that call, JB had conversations w/ Derek Price at
Wisvest re: prospective meeting dates and exchanging various info re: the
project.  In another phone conversation on Monday, August 7, I specifically
asked JB whether he had sent the project pro-formas and/or other proprietary
info to Derek Price to which JB responded "no."  He said he "... sent him
summary info ... but did NOT send him the pro-forma ..."  I then asked him to
forward to me copies of everything he had sent to Derek.  What he sent to me
was some very basic e-mails and financial summary info.  I also asked Derek
to forward to me everything JB had sent to him and I got a whole lot more,
including the full-blown project model/pro-forma.  This has seriously
diminished all of our negotiating leverage!

On 8/10/00, I became aware of some efforts that appear to involve JB in
setting up a South American version of Ecogas (Ecogas S.A.) and called him to
inquire as to what was going on.  In our phone conversation JB explicitly
denied "any involvement" including any "ownership" in such an enterprise.  I
also asked JB to forward to me by Friday, 8/11/00, copies of any and all
documents, agreements, etc... relating to Ecogas S.A.  To date he has sent me
nothing but an undated DRAFT MOU as well as some misc and meaningless
correspondence (undated and/or old e-mails, etc...).  None of the info sent
is what I asked for on August 4 (complete execution copies of the MOU
regarding Ecogas S.A. including ownership interests, etc... as well as copies
of Articles of Incorporation for Ecogas S.A., etc...Who is Ecogas S.A.?
Where is it currently incorporated?  Who are the beneficial owners?  Under
what authority are you transacting business (what is your title, etc...)  JB
continues to reference "nothing has been signed, incorporated, etc..." - then
why is JB's signature evidenced on an "Amendment" to the "Memorandum of
Understanding:  Ecogas S.A. - Tortola/JCS"?

JB referenced the need to "directing our efforts to resolution of the crisis,
rather than continuing personal distractions and devisiveness."  For the past
couple of months he has been asked to generate cash by selling assets,
greenhouse gas emission credits, etc...  To the best of my knowledge Ecogas
has yet to see one penny!

As always there seems to be a direct contradiction between the "stories" and
the facts!


Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Hi there,

I'm thinking of working out after work - hopefully kind of early.  Ok with
you?  I should still be home before 730.

Michael took Bronco to school.  I'm sure he will have him at the CC.

Kay


TASK ASSIGNMENT

Status:		completed

Task Priority:		3
Task Due On:		1/12/2001
Task Start Date:


Steve  Here  are my slides  and  a copy of  the  text  regards  Margaret


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	Doorstep - Oslo

Date:		5/17/2001
Time:		8:00 AM - 5:00 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


Dick,

Thanks for your reply.  I have since been assured that we will build on what
has happened thus far, which is a huge relief to me.  If we see forward
progress tomorrow we will be all smiles.

Again, thanks for your reply.

Kay


This is the memo that Sam sent back to Enron with a few revisions to my draft
procedures.  We are currently
 reviewing these changes and will discuss them during our conference call.

Ruth
---------------------- Forwarded by Ruth Concannon/HOU/ECT on 11/28/2000
06:37 AM ---------------------------

"Lee, Sam" <slee@Sithe.com> on 09/28/2000 01:12:19 PM
To: "'Ruth.Concannon@enron.com'" <Ruth.Concannon@enron.com>,
"'mroserberg@sithe.com'" <mroserberg@sithe.com>, "Oliver, Jason"
<joliver@Sithe.com>, "Hughes, Bill" <bhughes@Sithe.com>, "Fernandez, Bill"
<bfernandez@Sithe.com>, "Messina, Larry" <lmessina@Sithe.com>, "Lee, Sam"
<slee@Sithe.com>, "Maher, Janine" <jmaher@Sithe.com>, "Scherfling, Bob"
<bscherfling@Sithe.com>, "Grady, Mike" <mgrady@Sithe.com>
cc: "'Jeff.Donahue@enron.com'" <Jeff.Donahue@enron.com>,
Todd.Busby@enron.com, "Lee, Sam" <slee@Sithe.com>
Subject: Revised Procedures

Please see the revised procedures below:

 <<Sithe Empire Deal Procedures2.doc>>

 - Sithe Empire Deal Procedures2.doc


use the
http://www.enrononline.com


Rose,

I suggest putting [brackets] around commercial operation as the date we can
assign without consent.  As of now commercial operation is not a defined term
(I hope it will become a defined term), so we may want to agree to a
different milestone.

Thanks,

Kay

From: Roseann Engeldorf on 11/27/2000 01:51 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa
Bills/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: GE Assignment Language

I took the Mike Barnas language and added in all the "unreasonable to
withhold consent" language from GenPower, to which I added the "financing
structure" language.

I have attached a red-line, which you will need to "view" rather than
"launch."  Please let me know asap if you think that this will fly with GE,
or if the language needs to be softened at all.

Rose


The draft is ready to go but we need one (1) item from credit.  Hopefully,
this should be resolved within the hour!  Do you want a copy?  SS

From: Brent Hendry AT ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@CCMAIL on 06/18/99 09:04 AM
To: Sara Shackleton@ECT
cc:
Subject: PC draft

Are we any closer to having a draft ready?  The business guys lost an
opportunity to trade a couple of weeks ago when power prices shot upward.
Prices are now coming back down and they would like to be able to transact
soon.


Amelia Foster with Col Gas is trying to reach you.  Her number is
304-357-3702.

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 08/22/2000 08:02
AM ---------------------------

Chris Germany
07/24/2000 05:22 PM
To: Michael H Garred/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Scott Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON, dkinney@columbiaenergygroup.com
Subject: Re: Demand Charge Sheet

Mike, here is the worksheet.  The 2 tabs you need to use are "CES Retail
East" and "CES Retail Mrkt".  Also, CGAS contract #67693 goes from 54,327 dt
per day to around 108,000 dth per day starting Oct 1.

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 07/24/2000 04:59
PM ---------------------------

dkinney@columbiaenergygroup.com on 07/24/2000 04:33:06 PM
To: " - *Chris.Germany@enron.com" <Chris.Germany@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Re: Demand Charge Sheet

Chris--Yes, you may provide the subject information to Mr. Garred.

Thanks.

Chris.Germany@enron.com on 07/24/2000 04:08:02 PM
Please respond to Chris.Germany@enron.com

To: Doug Kinney/CES/ColumbiaGas@COLUMBIAGAS
cc: Scott.Goodell@enron.com
Subject: Demand Charge Sheet

As we discussed on the phone, Mike Garred with CES is requesting a copy of the
CES demand charge sheet.  Please let me know if you approve.


?
[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]
																			[IMAGE]

														Enerfax Daily

												[IMAGE]
																						[IMAGE]
																		[IMAGE]
																								[IMAGE]

																								[IMAGE]

																												[IMAGE]

																						Looking  for a past article or issue. Click here to use Sagewave's  Search.

																					Enerfax  Daily? -? Page  ? -? November 13,  2000

																											[IMAGE]

																									[IMAGE]

																										Enerfax  Daily? -?  Page 4? -?  November 13, 2000 -? ?  Past  Issues
Available on Sagewave

																												[IMAGE]
																							[IMAGE]

																																[IMAGE]
																										[IMAGE]
																													[IMAGE]
																														[IMAGE]

																															Enerfax  Daily? -?  Page 7? -?  November 13, 2000

																													[IMAGE]

																														Enerfax  Daily? -?  Page 8? -?  November 13, 2000

																												[IMAGE]

																								AEC  Sole Owner of Express Pipeline

																								?  ? Standard & Poor's has issued a CreditWatch update  indicating that the
rating on the $146.6 million senior secured  notes issued by the Express
pipeline project could be adversely  affected. AEC has exercised its option
for the purchase of  TransCanada's 50% interest in the Express Pipeline
Project and  Marquest, a marketing vehicle directly and indirectly owned
equally  by AEC and TransCanada. The project is a 1,717-mile-long pipeline
that runs from Hardisty, Alberta to Wood River, Illinois.

																												[IMAGE]

																									Financial Summary

																															[IMAGE]

																				")} TC
																[IMAGE]

 - blnk.gif
 - img17.gif
 - img18.gif
 - img19.gif
 - img20.gif
 - img21.gif
 - img22.gif
 - img23.gif
 - img24.gif
 - img25.gif
 - img26.gif
 - img27.gif
 - img28.gif
 - img29.gif
 - img30.gif
 - img31.gif
 - img32.gif
 - img33.gif
 - img11.gif
 - img34.gif
 - id=1381847
 - img35.gif


<<STORAGE BROWN BAG RF.doc>>

Attached is NESA/HEA's Storage Brown Bag luncheon flyer.
GUEST SPEAKER Mark D. Cook from Aquila, Inc.

If you have trouble opening this document, please call me at (713) 856-6525
with any questions.

Hope to see you there!

Lana Moore
Director of Education


Karen,

I will be in a class on Nov 27-28. The class in on "Understanding Options". Let me know if this is OK with you.

Thanks,
Monika
-----Original Message-----
From: ISC Registrar
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 1:02 PM
To: Causholli, Monika
Subject: Your enrollment status has been modified.

Dear MONIKA,

Your enrollment status has been changed from 'Wait Listed' to
'Enrolled' for the following course:

Course Title    : Understanding Options
Course Code     : UOPTNS-112701
Course Type     : Instructor Led Course

Starting Date   : Nov 27, 2001 8:00 AM
Ending Date     : Nov 28, 2001 5:00 PM

Thank you.


Member Services
Notice No. 01-37
May 30, 2001

COMMODITY EXCHANGE, INC.

SWITCH OF STATUS

Please be advised that effective, May 30, 2001, Craig Wolf (DOT-7811) will
switch his status from an option member to a licensee member.  However, Mr.
Wolf will remain a member guaranteed by FC Stone, LLC.

Furthermore, be advised that effective, May 24, 2001, Chris Karris (KAR-517)
will switch his status from a licensee member to a full member.  However, Mr.
Karris will remain a member guaranteed by Pioneer Futures, Inc.

NOTICE OF INTENTION TO TRANSFER MEMBERSHIP

Notice of Intention to Transfer Membership has been posted on the bulletin
board of the Exchange by:

Robert Blatchley (BRT-7483)

And

Susan Buckwalter

In connection therewith, notification of any claims against the
aforementioned individual arising out of transactions executed on the
Exchange up to the close of business on May 24, 2001, must be submitted to
the Corporate Secretary's Office within ten (10) days.

Inquiries regarding the above should be directed to the Member Services
Department at (212) 299-2370.

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=tana.jones@enron.com&refdo
c=(MS-37)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


We need to schedule a Calgary visit in the next couple weeks to let them know
what we expect of them.  Ted - do you have someone from RAC you could send
with us?

	From:  David Maxwell @ ECT                           09/19/2000 12:14 PM

To: Shona Wilson/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Genoil addition to MPR

Shona
 We have had issues in the past with Canada not informing us of all of their
Merchant investments.  For six months we chased Invasion Debt and finally
received enough information to put it on the MPR in August (only after it was
placed in Raptor I).  Also, about six months ago, John Lavorato asked about
an asset called CNR Warrants that showed up on the "hot list" but we were
told by Canada that they were going to sell it so they did not want it on the
MPR.  Today, we were told that Kyle Kitagawa wanted to sell an asset called
Genoil (approx. 4.7 million shares).  Again, we did not know that they owned
this investment.  We have contacted Donna Lowry about Genoil because Beau
Canada is on the restricted list and think Genoil would be, too.
 A trip to Canada may be necessary in order to reinforce our full disclosure
policies regarding the MPR.  Please let me know if I can provide any
additional information.

David M.
---------------------- Forwarded by David Maxwell/HOU/ECT on 09/19/2000 11:45
AM ---------------------------

	From:  Derek Lynn                           09/19/2000 11:44 AM

To: David Maxwell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Adarsh Vakharia/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kyle Kitagawa/CAL/ECT@ECT, Jai Hawker
Subject: Genoil addition to MPR

As a result of a distribution from Beau Canada Exploration Inc. to its
shareholders JEDI I now owns 4,666,667 Genoil Inc. shares (ticker GNO on the
Toronto Stock Exchange) in addition to 7,000,000 Beau Canada Exploration
shares.

Beau Canada owned an interest in Genoil Inc..  In August Beau announced that
it was going to distribute its ownership in Genoil to Beau shareholders.
Each Beau Canada shareholder received 2/3 of a Genoil share for each Beau
share.


Attached is a summary of Edison AL 1495-E, which is its version of the net
energy metering tariff.
?
Dan
 - 11-15-00 SCE AL Summary Chart.doc


This is for future reference.

---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/30/2000 07:27
PM ---------------------------

Kay Mann
11/30/2000 03:32 PM
To: Roger Ondreko/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matthew F Gockerman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rhett
Jackson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Bills/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: LM 6000/Coral transaction

Attached is a first draft of a letter agreement relating to the LM 6000/Coral
transaction.  Please let me know ASAP if you have any comments.

Thanks,

Kay


Just a reminder.
---------------------- Forwarded by Carolyn Gilley/HOU/ECT on 02/17/2000
05:30 PM ---------------------------

Kimberly Perkins
02/16/2000 03:03 PM
To: Kimberly Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Piwetz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Ann
Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kim S Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen P Schwarz/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Lawrence R Daze/HOU/ECT@ECT, David R Cogbill/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carolyn
Gilley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark D Thorne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eve Puckett/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Amber Limas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Yvonne
Acosta/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Michelle Neville/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pamela
Mitchell/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Judith Thorne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sandra R McNichols/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa
Shoemake/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Meeting Scheduled for Friday, 2/18

Please plan to attend the following meeting requested by Judy Thorne:

Topic: Open Text Roundtable with Power
Date: Friday, February 18
Time: 8:30 - 10:00 a.m.
Location: Conference Room 47C2

Breakfast will be provided.

If you are unable to attend, please contact me at X3-5304.  Thank you.

Kim Perkins


Here is an example of what such a letter might look like which may satisfy
several of the concerns you raised in our call this afternoon.


To The Core Aggregator Group:

 I have enclosed my near-to-final draft of the core aggregators'
reply brief in the CPUC's gas industry restructuring case (I.99-07-003).  As
you know, the reply brief is due to be filed today.  Please provide me with
your comments on the draft no later than noon today.  Thank you for your
attention to this matter.

   -John

 <<#1539913 v1 - CORE-BRIEF - Reply Brief in Support of Comprehensive
Setlement.doc>> S

**************

CONFIDENTIAL

Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps LLP
600 West Broadway
Suite 2600
San Diego, CA 92101-3391
(619) 236-1414

The information contained in this electronic mail transmission is
confidential and intended to be sent only to the stated recipient of the
transmission.  It may therefore be protected from unauthorized use or
dissemination by the attorney-client and/or attorney work-product
privileges.  If you are not the intended recipient or the intended
recipient's agent, you are hereby notified that any review, use,
dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly
prohibited.  You are also asked to notify us immediately by telephone and to
delete this transmission with any attachments and destroy all copies in any
form.  Thank you in advance for your cooperation.

 - #1539913 v1 - CORE-BRIEF - Reply Brief in Support of Comprehensive
Setlement.doc


Attached is language which can be included in transactions involving power
trades (physical or financial) which provides for the following:

1. Alberta market opening condition in favour of Enron Canada for January 1,
2001; and
2. after market opening, provision for suspension of obligations in case
there is a legislative or regulatory event affecting the Sundance "B" PPA
which materially adversely impacts our ability to dispatch or sell the power
of the Sundance "B" PPA.

There is, of course, some risk that counterparties will want these provisions
to be bi-lateral, which could introduce the ability for the counterparty to
use these concepts to avoid the transaction if, for example, the market moves
against them.

Regards,
Peter


1997 Robert Mondavi Winery Napa Valley Cabernet Sauvignon Reserve
(Exceptional) - Epitomizes Napa Valley Cabernet Sauvignon, the grape that is
the backbone of America's most important wine district. Even at Robert
Mondavi, which has produced its share of impressive cabs, the 1997 reserve
stands out. The 1997 vintage was the best of the 1990s in the Napa Valley,
yielding rich, concentrated red wines. Robert Mondavi Reserve's showy aromas
of spice, cassis, and cedar make a strong impression in the glass. On the
palate, the wine is deeply layered with pure dark-berry fruit flavors, has
firm, ripe tannins and an ultra-smooth finish with superb length. ($120)
Wine Enthusiast

November 2000 (Circulation: 79,000)

1997 Robert Mondavi Winery Napa Valley Cabernet Sauvignon Reserve - (91) Very
tight nose, with blackberry, coffee and cocoa notes, this is a big wine that
shows great intensity and depth. Quite closed now, the dark profile keeps its
cards close to the vest. One thing for sure: this definitely one for the
cellar. The finish is lengthy, with brisk tannins as well as espresso and
bitter-chocolate notes. Hold for eight to ten years; this wine should keep
till 2020. ($120)

Beverage Industry News
December 2000

HEADLINE: "Perfection in California"
AUTHOR: Wilfred Wong
SUMMARY:
Recommended:

1997 Opus One Napa Valley Red Wine (100) -- Could the 1997 Opus One be that
elusive wine that one never finds? In my continual pursuit for wine nirvana,
I have traveled to Bordeaux and back with stops in Italy and Australia and
for what? Besides losing my luggage, tracking through customs and using
non-functional phone cards, I have been searching for that wine of
perfection. Could this wine finally be the one? This just released Opus One
may be the absolute finest young red wine I have ever tasted in a bottle
(barrel samples don't count). Aristocratically structured the 1997 Opus One
magnificently perfumes the air with aromas of ripe, succulent fruit,
fragrant, sweet earth and delicate, white flowers. Persistent to the point of
perfection, this wine does not allow its captive audience to escape its web
of Cabernet ecstasy. Made with the five important varietals of Bordeaux (82%
Cabernet Sauvignon, 8% Cabernet Franc, 5% Merlot, 4% Malbec, and 1% Petit
Verdot), this spellbinding wine commands attention. This is my top wine of
the year. (Best Served 2002-2018). ($130)

WineToday.com
October 30, 2000

HEADLINE: "Wine Reviews"
AUTHORS: Tim Fish
SUMMARY:
Recommended:

1997 Robert Mondavi Winery Napa Valley Cabernet Sauvignon Reserve - (4

stars) Comments: A stunner. It brings out the best in the 1997 vintage. It
has deep, rich fruit with a ripe, silky texture; General Qualities:
Medium-full bodied, complex, dry, balanced acidity, strong oak impression,
fairly tannic; Color: Dark ruby; Aromas: Black cherry, cassis, chocolate,
coffee, licorice, pencil lead, toast, walnut; Other Descriptors: Balanced,
long finish, ripe, supple, velvety. ($120)

Nancy
(707) 251-4870 (phone)
(707) 265-5446 (fax)
"Plus je bois, mieux je chante"


<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">

 Dear Friend,

We at Hot Deals value
  you as one of our opt-in subscribers.

  We hope you enjoy and benefit from our efforts to send you the best

  offers available on the internet. Recently we have received a number

  of request from both customers and advertisers…asking that we make

  adult oriented materials available through our newsletters and offers.

  After reviewing your request, we have decided to develop very strict

  guidelines which will make adult material available to you. This decision

  was not taken lightly, as our membership represents a broad diversity of

  people throughout the world. We WILL NOT make this material available

  to anyone who does not specifically request it. To make sure of this we

  have implemented a three step process:

       1. If you are interested in receiving Adult offers,
  click the link below.

           If not, disregard this email
  as you will not receive any content

           containing adult materials
  from SaveRealBig.

       2. After clicking the link below you will be asked
  to enter your email

           address in the form provided,
  after doing so click "Submit". You will

           receive an email from us confirming
  that you wish to receive adult

           content from us.

       3. Reply to this email and you will become part of
  our

           "Adult Membership Club".

We appreciate your membership
  and wish to thank you for your efforts in

  helping us to better know and serve your personal interest!

  Click Here

  Thank You.

<FORM METHOD=GET ACTION="http://inbound.postmastergeneral.com/cgi-bin/pmg_subscribe.pl">

Please allow at least 48 hours for your unsubscribe requests to be processed.

Remove yourself from this list by either:

Entering your email address below and clicking REMOVE:

                       <INPUT TYPE="hidden" NAME="list" VALUE="HotDeals:*">
    <INPUT TYPE="hidden" NAME="server_action" VALUE="Unsubscribe">
    <INPUT TYPE="text" NAME="email_address" VALUE="plucci@ect.enron.com" SIZE=25>
    <INPUT TYPE="submit" VALUE="REMOVE">

    OR

  Reply to this message with the word "remove" in the subject line.

</FORM>

  This message was sent to address plucci@ect.enron.com

pmguid:ud.xom.ek6nt


Canyou get me detail then on the capital for the 2 years?
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


Sara,
	I was just following up on what the status of our review of the "Three-way" agreement and referral agreement contracts that we are pursuing with Plains Resources, in order to facilitate small producer hedging.  If you could give me a call or reply with where we stand, I would appreciate it.  Thanks

Mark

Mark D. Smith
Manager
Enron North America
713-853-6601
Mark.Smith@enron.com


----- Forwarded by Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT on 05/29/2001 10:39 AM -----

	Suzanne Adams
	05/29/2001 08:59 AM

		 To: sheila.tweed@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: GE Call This Week?


This is inbelievable.  Will FERC pay attention now?
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hall, Steve C.
Sent:	Friday, September 07, 2001 4:34 PM
To:	Yoder, Christian; Comnes, Alan; Mara, Susan
Subject:	"Independent" ISO never sent bill to CDWR.

Calif DWR Hasn't Received Any Invoice From ISO For Power  Updated: Friday, September 7, 2001 05:57 PM ET
By Mark Golden
Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES
NEW YORK (Dow Jones)--The California Department of Water Resources has never received an invoice from the California Independent System Operator for power purchased on behalf of the state's insolvent utilities, DWR spokesman Oscar Hidalgo said Friday.
Between the middle of January, when Gov. Gray Davis ordered the DWR to start paying for ISO power purchases and May 31, the ISO has procured about $3.3 billion in power on behalf of California's cash-strapped utilities, PG&E Corp.'s (PCG </investments/quotes/?symbol=PCG>, news </investments/news/?symbol=PCG>, msgs </investments/discuss/?symbol=PCG>) Pacific Gas & Electric Co. and Edison International's (EIX </investments/quotes/?symbol=EIX>, news </investments/news/?symbol=EIX>, msgs </investments/discuss/?symbol=EIX>) Southern California Edison, according to the ISO.
None of that power has been paid for, according to the ISO, as previously reported. The ISO and DWR have been negotiating the procedure for settling the accounts, but sellers to the ISO have been complaining that it shouldn't take eight months for the state agencies to get payments flowing.
"Until we get a bill that we can account for, we can't write a blank check and send it out. We haven't even received an improper bill," said Hidalgo.
The ISO was unable to comment immediately on whether it has sent a bill to the DWR for power purchased on behalf of the utilities. The ISO has said previously that it can't supply all the information the DWR wants without violating its own confidentiality rules.
The Independent Energy Producers Association, which represents many of the suppliers to the ISO, said this week the ISO market is on the verge of collapsing. Merchant power companies in California, such as Dynegy Inc. (DYN </investments/quotes/?symbol=DYN>, news </investments/news/?symbol=DYN>, msgs </investments/discuss/?symbol=DYN>) and Mirant Corp. (MIR </investments/quotes/?symbol=MIR>, news </investments/news/?symbol=MIR>, msgs </investments/discuss/?symbol=MIR>) continue to sell to the ISO, as ordered by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
The ISO, which has ultimate responsibility for avoiding blackouts, ensures there is exactly the right amount of power on the state's transmission lines to meet demand at all times, which requires constant buying and selling of electricity.
In mid-January, after the state's two main utilities ran out of cash, an executive order from Davis - backed by state law passed in February - authorized the DWR to pay for any purchases the ISO needed to make for the utilities.
"There is no bill. I don't know as a government agency how the process of payment for a significant amount of money - over $1 billion - would be in anybody's mind as a possibility," Hidalgo said.
The DWR, which has paid more than $9 billion for power it has bought from suppliers directly since January, has set aside money to pay for the ISO's last-minute purchases.
The ISO considers the entire $3.3 billion unpaid, though DWR operations chief Pete Garris said earlier this week that DWR may have paid a majority of that bill directly to power suppliers. The DWR has set aside about $1.25 billion to pay suppliers once it receives a detailed bill from the ISO that meets DWR requirements. Other procedural problems have prevented the DWR from making payment. The DWR wants to pay suppliers directly, which Garris said the ISO is uncomfortable with.
The ISO declined to discuss this direct-payment issue. ISO market rules require that buyers pay the ISO, which, in turn, pays sellers.
The FERC has ordered the ISO to stop buying power on behalf on parties that aren't creditworthy, specifically Pacific Gas & Electric Co. and Edison. PG&E has said that it continues to receive bills from the ISO, and has been told the bills are for informational purposes only.
-By Mark Golden, Dow Jones Newswires; 201-938-4604; mark.golden@dowjones.com <mailto:mark.golden@dowjones.com>

<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>


Dude,

What are the exact dates of the wedding?  I still haven't heard shit from
Max or Jen and I need to plan this shit.  Where are we suppose to stay?  How
much $ are you bringing with you?  Man, I feel like I'm getting married this
thing is costing me so much.

-PLK

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp


I am sorry for ISDA that Mark Harding cannot run for Chairman again.  I will
give you a call.  Is Montag willing to do it?


in that case I am glad I didnt elaborate. I just said I know you hit me there on purpose

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ward, Kim S (Houston)
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 1:50 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:

whatever it was, I think you sent the email to Kim E. Ward in London.  Please resend to Kim S. Ward in houston.


The following file contains a graphical view of the North American Gas average deal count by Trader and Product for EOL. This information is for comparative analysis only.  Do not update links when opening this file.

If you have any questions regarding this breakout, please let me know .

Thanks,
Adam Johnson
x54877
EnronOnline


This is a correction that substantially affects the legal name and the short
name so I am including the regular distribution on this correction.

  From Salomon Smith Barney AAA Energy Fund             to
Smith Barney AAA Energy Fund L.P.


There were several questions left for legal/regulatory to work on at the
close of our meeting today.  I'll try to restate them, and add my initial
thoughts, so we can all be sure to focus on the correct problems.

Q 1. Can TW use "negotiated rate" agreements for its new 150 mm/d expansion?

A.  Yes.  Independence, Guardian, and other new pipeline projects were
certificated on the basis of negotiated rate contracts.  The only restriction
is that we need to always offer cost-based recourse rate service as an
alternative to negotiated rates.  We hope to use negotiated rate agreements
for the entire 150 mm of capacity, but we won't know until the contracts are
executed how much of it will be negotiated rate contracts and how much of it
will be under recourse rate contracts.  I guess that means that in the cert.
app., we just tell the commission that we will be 100% at risk and that given
the huge interest in the open season, we have no doubts about our ability to
sell the full 150.  We should also tell the Commission we expect to sell the
capacity using negotiated rate contracts or recourse rate contracts or a
combination of both.

Q 2.  Can we give prospective customers a "cafeteria style" menu of options
(to steal Jeff's term), like the following:
 1.  5 yr. neg. rate deal at a locked in $.60 plus fuel and surcharges (or
whatever number we decide on)
 2.  10 y. neg. rate deal at a locked in $.45 plus fuel and surcharges
 3.  15 yr. neg rate deal at a locked in $.35 blah blah
 4 .  15 yr cost based recourse rate plus fuel and surcharges (importantly
this option is not locked in and will float with TW's actual rate levels and
fuel retainage percentages)

A.  I think the answer here is "yes."  Whatever options we come up with for
1, 2, and 3, we will always have to offer 4 as well.  Susan and Steve
Stojic:  please confirm that we have the right to define specific negotiated
rate options and stick to them.  Otherwise, this negotiated rate approach
could get completely unstructured such that we end up with some guys taking
our specific options and other guys custom tailoring weird variations (like a
7 yr, 231 day contract at $.51764, for example).  I'm not sure that would be
a bad thing, but we need to think about it.  We need to be sure we can tell a
customer "no" and make it stick if he tries to mix and match by asking for
the 5 yr term and the $.35 rate, for example.  I think we can lay out options
of our choosing and then enforce a "no substitutions" policy (this is
sticking with the "cafeteria" theme) but we need to be sure.

Q.3.  If we can use the "cafeteria options" approach, how much flexibility do
we have in structuring the options?

A:  This one is hard.  We need to be sure that the price and term we choose
to offer for options 1-3 is solely within our discretion.  We don't want to
be second guessed by FERC as to whether we should have offered option 1 at
$.58 instead of $.60.  Susan and Steve: if you guys confirm that we have
discretion in how to structure our negotiated rate options, does that mean we
can slant the economics of the negotiated rate options so they are a better
deal than the recourse option (for most shippers)?  I.e., could we
deliberately  incent shippers to sign on for the short term deals--i.e., by
offering options 1-3 at $.55, $.45 and $.40 instead of the $.60, $.45, and
$.35 shown above.  I suspect that is what Guardian and the other pipes did to
obtain 100% subscription under neg. rate deals.

Q.4.  How do we allocate capacity to customers if demand exceeds supply???

A.  Ideally, we'd be able to allocate the 150 to the guys who want to buy it
the way we'd prefer to sell it.  Under the above example, assuming Stan,
Danny and Steve decide short term deals are better, what if we get 100 mm/d
of offers on each of the 4 rate/term options described above.  That's 400
mm/d of demand for a 150 mm/d project.  Can we sell 100 to the guys who want
option 1 ($.60/5 yrs) and the remaining 50 to the 10 yr/$.45 guys?  That
really hoses the recourse bidders.  Do we have to cover the recourse demand
first and then allocate the remaining capacity pro rata to everyone else?
Pro rata to everyone?  Under the rule that negotiated rate bids have to be
deemed to be at max rate for purposes of allocation, pro rata to everyone may
be the right answer.  Or at least its the answer until we've filled the
recourse rate guys' orders, then we can give the remaining capacity to the
neg. rate guys whose bids we value most highly (using some objective
nondiscriminatory calculation of course).   Ugh.

Susan and Steve--please take a crack at questions 2-4.  I think 1 is answered
already.  I haven't done any research yet, so maybe these questions are
easier than they currently seem to me.  Get me and MKM on the phone at your
convenience to discuss.  We've gotta move quick so the marketers can get out
and sell this stuff.  DF


(1) Kopper isn't EWS but I understood he was Enron. I'll check.
(2) Yes, although my understanding is that Ted has agreed to go work for Billy lemmons in new A&A set up.

David

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kitchen, Louise
Sent:	Friday, March 23, 2001 2:10 PM
To:	Oxley, David
Subject:

(i) Is Michael Kopper Enron or LJM employee
(ii) PLease send Dave Duran all PRC feedback on TEd Bland (last 5 years) including comments


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	Jennie in town

Date:		11/11/2000
Time:		8:00 AM - 5:00 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description: