Sam:  Please get on my calendar to discuss maintenance of the log and contract review items.  Sara

Sara Shackleton
Enron Wholesale Services
1400 Smith Street, EB3801a
Houston, TX  77002
Ph:  (713) 853-5620
Fax: (713) 646-3490


Dave

Can you get one of your people to handle this.

Lavo
---------------------- Forwarded by John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron on 07/13/2000
12:48 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Jana Giovannini @ ECT                           07/13/2000 11:10 AM

To: John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Elizabeth Boudreaux/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Chart of Lavorato Analysts

John,
I am the ENA Staffing Coordinator for the Associate and Analyst Program.
Attached is a list of incoming Analyst that will begin next Monday and are
scheduled to go into the Trading organization per a resume review you had
done .  We are trying to identify exactly who these people will need to
report too in order to communicate to the Analyst and to also update our
database with correct rotation information.  We would like to tell the
Analyst exactly where they would go by Monday 17th.  Can you please advise me
on who I need to contact in the Trading orgainzation in order to get these
final placements made?

Thank you,
Jana
---------------------- Forwarded by Jana Giovannini/HOU/ECT on 07/13/2000
09:59 AM ---------------------------

	Angela Matheson @ ENRON
	07/13/2000 09:52 AM

To: Jana Giovannini/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Chart of Lavorato Analysts

Here is a chart of the "Per John Lavorato" people.


fyi
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Beck, Sally
Sent:	Friday, October 05, 2001 3:03 PM
To:	Bowen Jr., Raymond; Brown, Michael - COO London; Buy, Rick; Causey, Richard; Delainey, David; Derrick Jr., James; Dietrich, Janet; Fallon, Jim; Fastow, Andrew; Frevert, Mark; Glisan, Ben; Haedicke, Mark E.; Horton, Stanley; Hughes, James A.; Kean, Steven J.; Kitchen, Louise; Koenig, Mark; Lavorato, John; Lay, Kenneth; Mcconnell, Mike; McMahon, Jeffrey; Shankman, Jeffrey A.; Sherriff, John; Whalley, Greg
Cc:	Colwell, Wes; Roper, Kerry; Price, Brent A.; Castleman, Kent; Dyson, Fernley; Hayslett, Rod; Piper, Greg; Pickering, Mark
Subject:	Enron Net Works 2002 Budget Process

The 2002 Enron Net Works budget will for the first time combine allocations to business units for four key services:  Enron Online, IT Infrastructure, Risk Management Operations and IT Maintenance and Development.  We are providing a level of detail for expense and capital spend that is greater than that provided in past years, and that will allow business units to make informed choices regarding the services that they receive.

We are meeting with individual business unit Offices of the Chair to review in detail the four service areas delivered through Enron Net Works.  Some of these meetings have been completed and more will occur between now and October 12.  Please keep the following points in mind as we work with you to finalize budget:

Enron Networks today is very different from this time last year.  Additions to the 2002 ENW budget are Operations for EA, EIM and EGM.  Operations, IT Maintenance and Development, and IT Infrastructure for EES and EBS have been included under the ENW umbrella for the first time in the  2002  budget as well.  The 2001 budgets for these functions were approved and included in individual business units last year.   Any comparison of ENW's 2002 versus 2001 budget must be appropriately adjusted for these organizational changes to be relevant.

For further detail for each business unit, ENW's 2002 expense and capital dollars are organized to mirror each business unit's lines of business (products or commodities) in order to create a transparent view at a more granular level of the costs involved in supporting each of the lines of business.

The detail that is being provided to business units for IT costs delineates licensing fees, system maintenance costs and new development costs.  Detail on each IT development project identifies the purpose, business sponsor, line of business, "in progress" or "planned" designation, expense and capital spend, system impacted, and estimated completion date.   In order to finalize IT project budgets, decisions will be required from the business units on which projects to undertake in 2002.

If you have questions about the ENW budgets as we are working with you to finalize them,  please call one of us.

Greg Piper
Sally Beck
Mark Pickering


Attached is a summary report for experienceENRON first quarter activity.
Management of each operating unit has already received their specific report.

Please contact me with questions or changes.

Thank you.
Carrie


---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 01/06/2000 10:29 AM
---------------------------
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: follow thi link

http://www.altavista.com/cgi-bin/query?pg=q&sc=on&q=register+domain&kl=XX&styp
e=stext


Phone number is (713) 853-3512.

	arlanz@mexis.com (Armando Lanz)
	05/30/2001 02:28 PM

		 To: <Gerald.Nemec@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: Agency Agreement

The By-Laws are the ones we sent by fax to Barry L. ??  And yes, these are
the latest that the company has.? The other question  that you have about
having 2 people executing the agreements.? Yes it is  necessary that 2 of
those will need to sign.? One of them will be Genaro  Larrea Mota Velazco and
I believe that the other one will be Daniel Tellechea  Salido (this I will
have to confirm)
?
Which is your phone number ?? I may be calling you  between?the next couple
of hours.

Saludos,
?
Armando Lanz Oliver
Lanz Consultores en Energia  S.C.
Rodolfo Gaona # 6 Despacho 103, Col. Lomas de Sotelo
Naucalpan, Edo  de Mex CP 53390
Tel: 555 757 88
Fax: 555 757 95
Cel: 044 5502  0308
Biper: 5447 1111 cve 801  9581
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

----- Original Message -----
From:  Gerald.Nemec@enron.com
To: arlanz@mexis.com
Cc: Barry.Tycholiz@enron.com
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 2:10  PM
Subject: Agency Agreement

Per Barry's request, attached is the Agency and  Management Services
Agreement to be executed between Enron North America  Corp. and Mexicana De
Cobre.? Also attached is the form of agency  agreement to be attached as
Exhibit B to the Agency and Management Services  Agreement.? This agency
agreement is El Paso's form and must be  executed by ENA, Mexicana, and El
Paso.? The El Paso form requires  that you open as a read only file.
Please review.

(See attached  file: Agency & Management Agreement2.doc)(See attached file:
EPNG  Agency Agr.doc)

We are working on the gas purchase agreement and should  forward shortly.

We received the power of attorney and bylaws you  emailed.? I had a Spanish
speaking attorney in our office assist me  with their review.? The bylaws
look fine. We would like you to follow  up with a certified copy in the
mail.?? For now can you confirm  via a response to this email, that these
are the latest bylaws on  file?

?He noted that under the Power of Attorney, it would be  required that two
of the gentlemen listed on page 2 of the power of  attorney documentation,
execute our agreements.? Can you  confirm?? Would be happy to discuss this
with you.

Thank you  for your cooperation.

Gerald Nemec
Attorney
ENA  Legal


Good morning!!!

Ken will be here.

rosie

Katherine Brown
07/14/2000 08:35 AM

To: James M Bannantine/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Cliff
Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sanjay Bhatnagar/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Rick Buy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Causey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Diomedes
Christodoulou/SA/Enron@Enron, David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, James
Derrick/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Andrew S Fastow/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peggy_Fowler@pgn.com,
Mark Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron, Ben F Glisan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin Hannon/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, David
Haug/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Joe Hirko/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron, Larry L
Izzo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Mark
Koenig/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kenneth Lay/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rebecca P
Mark/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rebecca
McDonald/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jeffrey McMahon/HOU/ECT@ECT, J
Mark Metts/NA/Enron@Enron, Cindy Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lou L
Pai/HOU/EES@EES, Ken Rice/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Jeffrey
Sherrick/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, Jeff
Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joseph W
Sutton/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas
E White/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Brenda Garza-Castillo/NA/Enron@Enron, Marcia Manarin/SA/Enron@Enron,
Susan Skarness/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy
Guidroz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Beena
Pradhan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Karen K Heathman/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Sharron Westbrook/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kay Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Molly
Bobrow/NA/Enron@Enron, Rosane Fabozzi/SA/Enron@Enron, Stephanie
Harris/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bridget Maronge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary_trosper@pgn.com,
Nicki Daw/NA/Enron@Enron, Inez Dauterive/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol Ann Brown/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Elaine
Rodriguez/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Nancy Young/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Ann Joyner/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Cindy Stark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary E
Garza/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Maureen McVicker/HOU/EES@EES,
Joannie Williamson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rosalee Fleming/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Vanessa Groscrand/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tori L Wells/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marsha
Lindsey/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Cathy Phillips/HOU/ECT@ECT, Loretta
Brelsford/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sue Ford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dolores
Fisher/NA/Enron@Enron, Karen Owens/HOU/EES@EES, Dorothy Dalton/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Jewel Meeks/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Christina Grow/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lauren Urquhart/LON/ECT@ECT,
Sherri Sera/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Katherine Brown/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Pam
Benson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jana Mills/HOU/ECT@ECT, Liz M
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Judy G Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Bobbie Power/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING - MONDAY, JULY 17

Sorry for the delay with this notice - Katherine is out this week...Please
let me know your intentions at your earliest convenience.  SRS

Executive Committee Weekly Meeting
Date:  Monday, July 17
Time:  11:00 a.m. (CDT)
Location: 50th Floor Boardroom
Video:  Connections will be established with remote locations upon request.
Conf call: AT&T lines have been reserved.  Please contact Sherri Sera
(713/853-5984)
  or Katherine Brown (713/345-7774) for the weekly dial-in number and
passcode.

Please indicate below whether or not you plan to attend this meeting and
through what medium.

 Yes, I will attend in person _______

 By video conference from _______

 By conference call  _______

 No, I will not attend  _______

*  *  *

Please return this e-mail to me with your response by 12:00 p.m., Friday,
July 14.

Thank you,
Sherri


No need to do a risk memo if the legal risk rating would be a 1.  Is that
what this one would be?  Mark
----- Forwarded by Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT on 02/21/2001 01:49 PM -----

	Eddy Daniels@ENRON
	02/15/2001 04:17 PM

		 To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Charles Vetters/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kyle
Kettler/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J Lavorato/Enron@EnronXGate, Michael L
Miller/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Lance Schuler-Legal/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Risk Memo re Encorp Series D investment

Please find attached a legal risk memorandum re the Encorp investment for
your review.

Regards,
Eddy Daniels


As I promised this morning at the executive committee meeting, below are some
talking points for your use.

Overall message:  the market is working, regulation is not.

In California, peak demand rose by 10% over the last 4 years while new
capacity grew by only 2%.  But, as you would expect, the market responded by
proposing 8,000MW of new generation - - more than enough to offset the peak
demand growth.  The regulatory process, at both the state and local level,
has failed to site this new generation.  The problem is regulation, not
deregulation.

When San Diego customers began experiencing the effects of higher prices,
Enron responded with a fixed price which would have shielded San Diego
customers from price volatility and provided prices below their current
summer levels (Enron's price was about $55/MWH).  After publication of
Enron's offer, nine other companies made offers.  Again, the market responded
where regulation failed.  San Diego has not accepted any of these offers
because of regulatory/legislative restrictions on its ability to buy outside
of the PX (i.e. the spot market).

In markets where siting is easier, suppliers have moved to build additional
generation.  Enron built 3 plants in response to the 1998 price spikes.
Those plants were planned, sited and built in less that 12 months - - in time
for the summer of 1999.  Where regulatory hurdles are lower, the market
responds.

The solution to current pricing and reliability issues is more competition
not reregulation.  Policy makers should:

Open the transmission grid so that power can get from where it is to where it
is needed.

Expedite interconnection of new generation.

Expedite siting of new facilities.

Give customers a choice, so that they have better access to demand side
solutions.

Also attached is a more detailed discussion of California, prepared by Jeff
Dasovich of our San Francisco office.


Good questions for which I don't currently have answers.

	James D Steffes
	10/03/2000 10:17 AM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: High Tech Slides

Jeff --

Looks fine.  Who is going to take these slides out to our "targets"?  What is
the gameplan for coordinating calendars?

Jim


I already have a meeting scheduled at 11 on Monday.


We are making a number of significant organizational changes.  These changes
are intended to accomplish four key objectives:

First, we need to realign all our wholesale businesses around the successful
business model developed over the last decade in North America and Europe.
This model relies on extensive physical and transactional networks built
around a relatively small strategic asset position.

Second, we need to significantly streamline corporate reporting
relationships.  Particularly with Joe Sutton,s departure, the ability to
directly manage the day-to-day activities of 15 independent business units
has become increasingly difficult.

Third, we need to accomplish these changes without, in any way, compromising
the ongoing profitability of all our businesses and without delaying or
hindering our effort to monetize a significant portion of our lower-yielding
asset positions.

And fourth, as always, we need to take advantage of the reorganization to
redeploy our talent into our highest value opportunities.

ENRON WHOLESALE SERVICES

Today, we are forming Enron Wholesale Services (EWS) which will consolidate
our global wholesale businesses.  The closer alignment of our wholesale
businesses will accomplish the following: (1) enhanced communication and
coordination across business units, (2) more rapid deployment of people to
higher valued opportunities, (3) more effective prioritization of
opportunities across the wholesale business, and (4) more rapid extension of
Enron,s wholesale business model and capabilities into new industries and
markets.

Enron Wholesale Services will include our current North American, European
(including Japan and Australia), Global Markets, and Industrial Markets
operations, and will be expanded to include Enron,s Net Works business unit
as well as a new unit ) Enron Global Assets.  In addition, Enron,s merchant
businesses outside of North America and Europe will be integrated into this
new structure as described below.

Mark Frevert, currently Chairman of each of our wholesale units, will assume
the role of Chairman and CEO of Enron Wholesale Services.  Greg Whalley,
currently Chairman and CEO of Enron Net Works, will join Mark in the Office
of the Chairman as President and Chief Operating Officer.

Providing further impetus for these organizational changes, several of our
international business unit leaders have elected to move into new leadership
positions:

Rebecca McDonald, currently CEO of Enron APACHI, will join EWS as President
and CEO of Enron Global Assets. Enron Global Assets will have responsibility
for managing all of Enron,s existing energy asset portfolio outside of North
America and Europe.  Joining Rebecca in the Office of the Chairman as COO
will be Jim Hughes, currently COO of Enron APACHI.  Rebecca and Jim will
report to the EWS Office of the Chairman.

Sanjay Bhatnagar, currently CEO of Enron India, has joined EBS as CEO for the
Middle East and Asia region.  Sanjay will be responsible for building our
broadband business in this region and the current EBS team in this region
will report to Sanjay.  In this role, Sanjay will report to the EBS office of
the Chairman.  In addition, Sanjay will continue to remain responsible for
Enron,s wholesale energy business in India and will transition this business
into Enron Global Assets in the near future.

Diomedes Christodoulou, currently Co-CEO of Enron South America, has joined
EBS as Chief Commercial Officer.  Diomedes will be located in London and will
focus his origination activities on global opportunities, with near term
attention to the wholesale and enterprise sectors.  Diomedes will report to
the EBS Office of the Chairman.

Jim Bannantine, currently Co-CEO of Enron South America, will be joining EES
to lead EES, commercial efforts outside North America and Europe.  In order
to ensure a smooth transition for our South American businesses and to
facilitate our asset sales activities, Jim will remain in South America for
at least the next several months and continue to serve as CEO of Enron South
America.  Throughout the transition, Jim will report to Cliff Baxter and to
the Office of the Chairman of Enron Wholesale Services.  Following the
transition, Jim will join EES.

In addition to these changes in our international asset operations
activities, we are making the following changes in our merchant wholesale
businesses and the commercial support functions:

Enron Net Works
Louise Kitchen will assume Greg,s previous responsibilities as President and
CEO of Enron Net Works, reporting into Mark and Greg.

Enron Americas
Concurrent with the transfer to Enron Global Assets of responsibility for
operating Enron,s South and Central America asset base, all trading,
marketing, and new asset development activities in these regions will report
into a new entity, Enron Americas.  Enron Americas will have responsibility
for all wholesale merchant businesses across North, Central and South
America.  Dave Delainey, President and CEO, and John Lavorato, Chief
Operating Officer will comprise the Office of the Chairman for Enron
Americas.

Enron Europe
The Enron Europe organization, which includes Enron,s businesses in Australia
and Japan, and Enron Metals, remains unchanged under the leadership of John
Sherriff, President and CEO, and Michael Brown, Chief Operating Officer.

Enron Global Markets
Enron Global Markets, under the leadership of Mike McConnell, President and
CEO, and Jeff Shankman, Chief Operating Officer, will continue to have
responsibility for Enron,s Middle East and LNG operations.  With the
exception of Ecoelectrica in Puerto Rico, all operating power plants and
associated personnel in the Caribbean and Central America will transfer to
Enron Global Assets.  Enron Global Markets will also continue to manage the
commodity businesses in crude and products, coal, weather, insurance,
equities, interest rates, foreign exchange, and agricultural products.

Enron Industrial Markets
Enron Industrial Markets, organization, under the leadership of Jeff McMahon,
President & CEO, and Ray Bowen, Chief Operating Officer, remains unchanged.

Commercial Support for EWS
The commercial support functions for EWS will remain with, and be managed by,
the individual business units.  We are creating no incremental overhead in
the creation of EWS, and in fact hope to reduce our operating costs by more
efficient utilization and sharing of resources across EWS.

To this end we have asked several people to take on an expanded role across
EWS in addition to their ongoing roles within their business units.  These
newly defined roles are as follows:

Mid and Back Office Operations ) Sally Beck will lead Mid and Back Office
Operations across EWS.  These services will become part of Enron Net Works,
with Sally reporting to Louise Kitchen and Rick Causey, Executive Vice
President and Chief Accounting Officer.  This alignment creates a coordinated
services organization with IT and e-commerce platforms to support the
wholesale businesses and to maximize opportunities to commercialize these
services.  Mid and Back Office services for all commercial activities will
continue to be organized with dedicated operations controllers responsible
for specific commodities and/or geographic locations.
Legal ) Mark Haedicke will serve in the role of General Counsel for EWS.
Regulatory and Government Affairs ) This function will remain organized on a
regional basis.  Rick Shapiro will support all EWS businesses operating in
the Americas, and Mark Schroeder, who is based in London, will support all
European and Eastern Hemisphere operations.  Rick and Mark will also continue
to support all other Enron businesses operating in their respective regions
and will continue to report to Steve Kean, Executive Vice President and Chief
of Staff.
Public Relations ) This function is also organized primarily on a regional
basis.  Eric Thode will have responsibility for North American activity,
Enron Net Works, and Enron Industrial Markets.  Jackie Gentle will continue
in her role for Enron Europe (including Japan and Australia) and John Ambler
will have responsibility for activity outside North America and Europe as
well as providing support for Enron Global Markets and Enron Global Assets.
These individuals will also continue to have a split reporting relationship
to Mark Palmer, Vice President of Communications.
Business Analysis and Reporting ) Wes Colwell will expand his role to cover
EWS reporting in addition to his current role in North America.

Attached for your review is an organization chart for Enron Wholesale
Services which summarizes the changes described here.  As this organization
continues to evolve we will keep you informed of any additional changes.

ENRON GLOBAL EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION
AND ENRON WIND

 As part of our company-wide initiative to examine our assets and investments
around the world, we are considering a variety of options with respect to
EGEP and EWC.  As a consequence, we are putting these businesses under Cliff
Baxter,s direction.  Jeff Sherrick, CEO of EGEP, and Jim Noles, CEO of Enron
Wind, will report to Cliff.

CORPORATE STAFF

 We are consolidating the corporate staff functions: Human Resources,
Government Affairs, Public Relations/Communications and Administration.  In
that regard, Cindy Olson, Executive Vice President of Human Resources and
Community Relations, will report to Steve Kean, Executive Vice President and
Chief of Staff.

COMMITTEE STRUCTURE

 In light of the increased leadership opportunities created by Enron,s
growth, the Executive Committee will be expanded to include more of our
business unit leaders.  The primary role of this committee will continue to
be the communication of relevant information across Enron,s businesses and
the coordination of activities across those businesses.  We will also be
drawing on this group to lead company-wide initiatives such as the
performance review process and evaluation and creation of new businesses.
The Executive Committee membership is shown on the attached list.

 We are also forming a new committee ) the Enron Corporate Policy Committee.
This group will be responsible for overall corporate policy, personnel
management policy and corporate strategy.  The Enron Corporate Policy
Committee membership is also shown on the attached list.

 We are confident that these changes will align our talent and our capital to
our highest return opportunities.  Please join us in congratulating and
supporting all of these individuals in their new roles.


You'd better be back in town!  Sara

	Yao Apasu@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	05/30/2000 03:25 PM

		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marie Heard/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Marie Heard

I can't wait. I hope to be back in town by then. See you all soon.

Yao

From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 05/23/2000 09:40 AM
To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara
Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S
Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tracy Ngo/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rod Nelson/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Suttle/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Paul Radous/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Erica Braden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Taffy
Milligan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kaye Ellis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Becky Tlucek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Yao
Apasu/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Brent
Hendry/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jason Peters/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Shari Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marie Heard/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
cc:
Subject: Marie Heard

You are Cordially Invited To Attend A Party Celebrating The Privilege You
Had  Of Working With Marie Heard At ENA

Date:  June 9, 2000
Dress: Casual
Time:  6:00 P.M. Until 8:00 P.M.
Location:  3915 Coleridge (West University)
  Houston, Texas
  (713) 664-3207)
  (Driving Instructions Will Be Available)

Please RSVP To Suzanne Adams @ 713-853-7340
By June 4, 2000


Please see attached:


John - Attached is an Excel spreadsheet with parameters we used this morning to calculate revenue less O&M.

Let me know your thoughts.

Ken

 - Frontera REV-VOM CALC.xls


As you know, we've been working for about an eternity to unbundle SoCalGas'
system.  90+% of the industry agreed to an unbundling solution and filed it
as a settlement at the Commission.  In opposition, muni generators and TURN
supported SoCalGas' original proposal to essentially maintain the status quo
(SoCalGas eventually came over to our side, as did Southern California
Edison).

A judge's proposed decision came out the day before Thanksgiving adopting the
settlement advocated by the muni generators and TURN.

If it weren't for the continual barrage of retrograde policy pronouncements
coming from the "new" California PUC, folks would be genuinely shocked by the
judge's proposed decision, but as things are, it was somewhat expected.

There's one silver lining:  We managed to get in both settlements an
identical provision that eliminates a substantial amount of financial risk TW
would have faced but for the provision.  So from that perspective, the choice
to go with the TURN/muni settlement and embrace the status quo does no harm.
It does considerable harm, however, when compared to the significant value
that would have been created if the judge adopted the the unbundling
settlement.

We have a chance to go on the record in a trade publication "California
Energy Markets."  Recent events might persuade us to keep a low profile
generally at this point.  On the other hand, perhaps the time is right to
start coming out of our corner just a bit and pointing out the very poor job
this Commission is doing in managing California's energy policy.  I'm
squarely on the fence at this point and am seeking feedback.  A proposed
comment is attached.

Two questions:

1) Do folks think that there's value in providing a comment?

2) If so, does this statement work, or do folks have suggestions?

Thanks,
Jeff

"The California Public Utilities Commission has a choice. It can adopt the
same, common sense natural gas policy for Southern California that,s been in
place and working well for consumers in PG&E,s service territory.  Or it
stick with the status quo, which the industry agrees is at least partially
responsible for bottlenecks and high prices in California.  The proposed
decision opts for the status quo.  That's not going to California,s natural
gas problems and it,s likely to make matters worse in California's electric
industry."


Gas Rule
The Commission voted out a draft Gas Rule today (Rm98-10/RM98-12).  Based on
the discussion, the rule contains the following major provisions:

Waiver of Capacity Release Price Caps.  A waiver of the price cap on
short-term (1 year or less) capacity release transactions through September
2002.  Hebert would have preferred a permanent removal of the price cap.
Seasonal Rates.  A framework for pipelines to propose peak & off-peak rates
for short-term services.  Pipelines would make pro forma filings.  The
Commission commits to act on the filings within 60 days.  There would be a
requirement to make a cost and revenue study after 15 mo. to demonstrate
whether there are overcollections as a result of the seasonal rates.  Any
overcollections would be shared 50-50 with customers.
Term Differentiated Rates.  Approval of the concept of term-differentiated
rates, subject to the requirement that a pipeline would have to make a
Section 4 filing to implement term-differentiated rates.
Operational Provisions.  Scheduling/segmentation/penalty rules along the
lines set forth in the NOPR, including:  (1) equality of scheduling between
capacity release and pipeline services, (2) standardization of segmentation
rules, (3) moving away from "command and control" imbalance/OFO provisions in
favor of new services and better information  to manage imbalances, and (4) a
requirement to credit remaining penalty revenues.
Real-time Reporting.  Transactional data would be electronically posted on a
real-time basis.
Right of First Refusal.  The rule continues a ROFR for all existing long-term
contracts with the 5-year matching cap, subject to the following revisions:
(1) for future contracts, only contracts of more than 1 year at maximum rates
will have the ROFR (i.e. discount rate contracts will not enjoy ROFR), and
(2) on systems with incremental rates, a customer exercising ROFR may be
required to match the incremental rate, but these provisions will not take
effect until a pipeline has made a Section 4 filing to determine the correct
rate for ROFR on a particular system.
Not Included in the Rule.  The rule does not have a mandatory auction
requirement, although voluntary auctions are discussed. The rule does not
authorize negotiated terms.

Clarification of Certificate Policy Statement/NOPR to Eliminate Optional
Expedited Certificates
The Commission proposed to eliminate OEC in favor of a single framework for
all Section 7 certificates.  During the
pendency of the NOPR, OEC would still enjoy a presumption that the facilities
are in the public interest, but the factors set forth in the Policy Statement
may be used to rebut the presumption.

With respect to the Certificate Policy statement, the Commission generally
sticks with the policy in the September order.  It reaffirms the no subsidy
policy, provides guidance on projects that are a combination
expansion/existing system, clarifies that Memphis clauses can still be used
in expansion contracts (although the FERC doesn't necessarily think its the
best way to allocate risks), and discusses ROFR in the expansion context.  It
does not appear that the clarification addresses the issue of timing of
applicability.

Keep in mind that this summary is based only on the open discussion.  A
written copy of the rule is not yet available.  I will send a more detailed
review once I have seen the rule.


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 12/01/2000
03:36 PM ---------------------------

Vince J Kaminski
12/01/2000 03:14 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: TO_DO

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 12/01/2000
03:15 PM ---------------------------

Vince J Kaminski
12/01/2000 02:16 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: TO_DO

Start project  with Elene for Mark


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------
W E E K E N D   S Y S T E M S   A V A I L A B I L I T Y

F O R

November 3, 2000 5:00pm through November 6, 2000 12:00am
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------

SCHEDULED SYSTEM OUTAGES:

ARDMORE DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

AZURIX: No Scheduled Outages.

EB34 DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

EDI SERVER: No Scheduled Outages.

ENRON NORTH AMERICAN LANS:  No Scheduled Outages.

FIELD SERVICES:  No Scheduled Outages.

INTERNET: SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

LOTUS NOTES: No Scheduled Outages.

MARKET DATA: No Scheduled Outages.

NT: No Scheduled Outages.

OS/2:  No Scheduled Outages.

OTHER SYSTEMS:  SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

OTHER SYSTEMS:
Impact:  CORP
Time:  Sat 11/4/2000 at  11:00:00 PM CT thru Sat 11/4/2000 at  11:45:00 PM CT
 Sat 11/4/2000 at    9:00:00 PM PT  thru Sat 11/4/2000 at   9:45:00 PM PT
 Sun 11/5/2000 at   5:00:00 AM London thru Sun 11/5/2000 at  5:45:00 AM London
Outage:  ERMT Database
Environments Impacted:  ENA
Purpose: To Increase Number of Processes, sessions, and transactions in the
init.ora file
Backout: Restore the original init.ora file and restart database
Contact(s):  Alex Hsieh  713-853-6561  713-288-1779

OTHER SYSTEMS: Batch Scheduling
Impact:  CORP
Time:  Fri 11/3/2000 at  8:00:00 PM CT thru Fri 11/3/2000 at  9:00:00 PM CT
 Fri 11/3/2000 at  6:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 11/3/2000 at  7:00:00 PM PT
 Sat 11/4/2000 at  2:00:00 AM London  thru Sat 11/4/2000 at  3:00:00 AM London
Outage:  Batch Scheduling Server maintenance
Environments Impacted:  Corp
Purpose: This maintenance is to upgrade some of our older servers (
ECTHOU-BPMS1 and ECTHOU-BPS1)and replace them with newer ones, as well as
back up our current data.
Backout: Re initialize old servers and bring them on-line.
Contact(s):  Larry Robinson  713-853-5956  713-284-3554
  Rusty Cheves  713-345-3798  713-415-4707

SITARA:  No Scheduled Outages.

SUN/OSS SYSTEM: No Scheduled Outages.

TELEPHONY: No Scheduled Outages

TERMINAL SERVER:  No Scheduled Outages.

UNIFY:  No Scheduled Outages.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------
FOR ASSISTANCE

(713) 853-1411   Enron Resolution Center
(713) 853-5536   Information Risk Management

Specific Applications Help:
Unify On-Call      (713) 284-3757  [Pager]
Sitara On-Call     (713) 288-0101  [Pager]
RUS/GOPS/GeoTools/APRS   (713) 639-9726  [Pager]
OSS/UA4/TARP    (713) 285-3165  [Pager]
CPR      (713) 284-4175  [Pager]
EDI Support      (713) 327-3893  [Pager]
All Other Systems    (713) 563-5797  [Pager]
      or (713) 563-5987  [Pager]


Mercy,

Since there are so many new Credit people that we (Legal) do not know, it
would be very helpful if you could provide me with a new list of the Credit
Team and their phone numbers.  The last list we have is dated 6/5/00.
Thanks!


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Information Update on Perix
Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2001 20:02:33 -0500 (EST)
From: MarkRsea@aol.com
To: ROB-GRETCHEN-DAVIS@email.msn.com,
moryak@worldnet.att.net,anchoraweigh@caltel.com,
zaverukha@worldnet.att.net, akoola@juno.com,KKKobe@kh.rim.or.jp,
MNJC@home.com, SUMMITEERS@worldnet.net, Igo2c@aol.com,JOJOLA7@aol.com,
charryl@pacbell.net, sakae_yamamoto@ccgate.apl.com,skuwada_ilms@msn.com,
SAUTNERS@pacbell.net, CAPTPWF@aol.com,jimbo@pacifier.com,
CatRsea@aol.com, merahma@boracap.i-next.net,SeaBaggg@aol.com,
ICEAXXE@aol.com, cregan@juno.com, jules@shasta.com,LADAIR@directcon.net,
ADAIR6@prodigy.net, jer@oregon.uoregon.edu

Good day all:
I want to update you on some events regarding Perix.  I have tried to
contact them today via telephone, web site and email and I'm not having
any
luck.  I presently don't know if they are in business or been bought out
by
another firm or what.
The Web Site I tried:  perixindustries.com connects me to another firm
SRS
Consulting.
Email address:  perixgroup@aol.com gives the following error "This is
not a
known member"
Telephone number 714-923-2612 and fax number 714-923-2601 are
continuously
busy.
If you have the correct contact numbers, please let me know.

Some history:
Oct 4, 2000, Chairman of the Board for Perix Industries, Mr. James E.
Reinmuth stated in an email, "I will personally commit to the
preparation of
a Perix newsletter within the next 60 days which summarizes the results
of
negotiations with several potential joint venture partners, and our
plans for
Year 2001."
I have received no information.  Mr. Reinmuth's letter was in direct
response to the concern raised by several shareholders on the lack of
information on our investment.  If anyone has received the newsletter,
please
email me and I'll forward a check to you to mail me a copy.

Nov 8, 2000:  Letter sent to Perix Industries by attorney Zachary A.
Wright
of Short, Cressman & Burgess, PLLC on behalf of myself requesting
financial
information of Perix.
As per Mr. Wright, I quote the following, which was sent to Perix in
the
letter:
QUOTE
California corporations are required by law to make certain
information
available to shareholders.  First, an annual report must be provided to
shareholders within 120 days of the end of the corporation's fiscal
year,
unless this requiremetn is waived by the corporation's bylaws.
Cal.CorpCode
1501(a).  Even if the requirement is waived, the corporation must
provide a
year-end financial report to a shareholder within (30) days of the
shareholder's request for it.  Cal.CorpCode 1501(c).  This year-end
financial
report must contain a balance sheet and an income statement, as well as
a
statement of changes in financial position for the fiscal year.  It must
be
accompanied by a report of the corporation's independent accountants or,
of
there is no such report, a certificate signed by an authorized officer
of the
corporation that the statements were prepared accurately and completely
from
the books and records of the corporation.  Second, California law
requires
that corporations make available to shareholders "accounting books and
records" of the corporation, as well as the minutes of any proceedings
of
shareholders, the board of directors or committees of the board of the
corporation.  Cal.CorpCode 1601.   This definition encompasses all books
of
account, accounting journals, share registers or duplicate share
registers.
We hereby demand that you copy and mail to us the information that
must be
made available to Mr. Remijan under California law no later than thirty
(30)
days from the date of this letter.
UNQUOTE
My attorney or I have not received any word or information from
Perix
regarding this request for financial information.  Mr Wright advises
that I
could file a lawsuit for a writ of mandamus or other order to obtain
this
information from Perix.  California law Cal.Corp.Code 1603 and other
applicable law also provides for payment of all costs and attorneys'
fees by
the corporation in the event that the shareholder is required to file
suit to
obtain the information.

If anyone has further information about whether Perix is still in
business, I would appreciate an email.  Something tells me that it
doesn't
look good for us.  I hope that I am wrong.
Thanks and best regards,
Mark Remijan
MarkRsea@aol.com
206-782-3278


Jeff,

 I received the rent roll.  I am going to be in San Marcos this weekend but I
am booked with stage coach.  I will drive by Friday evening.
 I will let you know next week if I need to see the inside.  Can you find out
when Chelsea Villa last changed hands and for what price?

 What about getting a look at the site plans for the Burnet deal.  Remember
we have to get Brenda happy.

Phillip


BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTS

Enron Freight Markets
Enron Freight Markets (EFM) launched its over-the-road trucking business this
week.  In addition, EFM completed 199 intermodal transactions in the first
week of April.

ENA West Power
ENA West Power recently closed the sale of two power projects.  The 750MW
Pastoria Energy Facility in Kern County, California was sold to Calpine and
the 240MW Fountain Valley Power project in Colorado was sold to Black Hills
Energy Capital.  Given the power shortage in the West, ENA is developing
additional power generation in Nevada, California and Washington.

Enron Industrial Markets
The newsprint group of EIM is working to revolutionize the newsprint market
and bring financial rigor and market efficiencies to a business that has
remained relatively unchanged for more than a century. The global newsprint
market is a 23 billion dollar a year business with the North American market
comprising one third.  The group's originators, mid-marketers, and financial
and physical traders offer our customers numerous financial and physical
products not previously available in the market.

EIM has made a substantial commitment to this business with the purchase of
Garden State Paper company last year and the recent purchase of Daishowa
Paper in Quebec City. The number of transactions has grown exponentially with
the physical trading alone reaching a nominal trading volume of more than
$10,000,000 per month in little more than four months since opening.  In
addition to physical spot transactions, the desk offers our counterparties
log-term fixed priced transactions, indexed based pricing, forward contracts,
swaps, and derivative products.

Forest Products
Forestweb Inc., an Internet-based generator, aggregator and integrator of
knowledge and information for the forest products industry, announced a new
window to industry financial and risk management tools available from
Clickpaper.com. Clickpaper allows the industry direct access to transactable
prices for both physical and financial products, in an electronic format.

Paperloop.com, one of the leading online resources for the forest products
industry, announced the addition of Clickpaper.com in their emarketplace,
which showcases various e-commerce companies and highlights their services.
Paperloop provides Clickpaper.com exposure to its 250,000+ monthly users in
the pulp, paper and converting industries.

IN THE NEWS

Ken Lay was the cover story for the April 2001 issue of Continental Magazine.
 He had positive things to say about his employees.

&Sitting in his 50th floor mahogany-paneled office overlooking his
much-beloved downtown Houston, Lay, with a self-conscious smile, bows his
head slightly as he,s described as an innovative market maker.  +I really can,
t take any credit, he says. My employees are responsible for what Enron
does.,  What he does best, the Missouri-born corporate icon says, is +to
create an atmosphere of empowerment and creativity and hire bright,
innovative people who aren,t afraid to take risks and try new things.8

WELCOME
New Hires
EIM   - Craig Rickard, Lisa McClendon
ENA  - Ben Brasseaux, Stephen Swisher, Tamera Joyner, Vanessa Griffin,
Kathleen Ashton

Weekly EnronOnline Statistics

Below are the latest figures for EnronOnline as of April 6, 2001.

* Total Life to Date Transactions >  845,000
* Life to Date Notional Value of Transactions > $500 billion

NUGGETS & NOTES

Mark your lunch calendars now! The next EWS Brown Bag is Thursday, April 19
at 11:30 AM.  Tim Battaglia VP/EIM will be discussing Steel Origination.

Congratulations to Peter del Vecchio, EIM senior counsel, and his wife, Nair.
They are the proud parents of Dante Valentin del Vecchio, born April 3,
weighing 4 pounds, 8 ounces.

NEWS FROM THE GLOBAL FLASH

Enron Poland obtains Gas Trading License
On 22nd March 2001 Enron Poland received a 10-year Gas Trading License, valid
for both domestic gas trading within Poland as well as for gas exports.  The
license is a key component to our entering the gas trading market in Poland
and, coupled with the Power Trading License we obtained in 1999, will give
Enron Poland a strong position in the developing wholesale energy market.  In
the next two to three weeks, we expect to receive a cross-border trading
license covering gas imports that are further regulated under the Polish
Energy Law Ordinance on Gas Import Diversification.

Enron Wind announces first UK off-shore wind farm
On 5th April 2001, Enron Wind announced that it had been granted the right to
initiate the planning process for its first UK offshore wind farm, located at
Gunfleet Sands, 7km from Clacton-upon-Sea in Essex.  Construction is expected
to start towards the end of 2002, with the wind farm of 30 turbines being
operational by Q4 2003.  Enron Wind is also actively involved in a number of
on-shore projects in the UK, including the development of wind farms in Wales
and Northern Ireland.

LEGAL STUFF
The information contained in this newsletter is confidential and proprietary
to Enron Corp. and its subsidiaries.  It is intended for internal use only
and should not be disclosed.


FYI. Today we received the attached letter forwarded by Gary Fergus (our
attorney on the California Attorney General investigation) from the
California Attorney General.  This letter is a protocol for retaining
electronic evidence.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 12/14/2000 04:55 PM
---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Fergus, Gary S." <GFergus@brobeck.com>
12/14/2000 02:42 PM

To: "Mary C. Hain (E-mail)" <mary.hain@enron.com>, "Christian. Yoder
(E-mail)" <cyoder@enron.com>, "Stephen C. Hall (E-mail)" <schall@stoel.com>,
"Mike D. Smith (E-mail)" <msmith1@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Rockman Letter

FYI.

Thanks.
Gary

 <<preservation of evi. protocol.PDF>>

=======================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of
the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to
postmaster@brobeck.com
BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP
http://www.brobeck.com

 - preservation of evi. protocol.PDF


Here's the email. Any questions, give me a call. Per
---------------------- Forwarded by Per Sekse/NY/ECT on 08/21/2000 10:50 AM
---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Per Sekse                           08/10/2000 02:56 PM

To: John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Fred Lagrasta/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Hedge Fund Update & Summary

Fred asked me to pull together an update for you on our dealings with Hedge
Funds. Look forward to seeing you at 2PM today.

We have active trading relationships with two hedge Funds, Tudor & Ospraie,
and have documentation negotiations under way with 11 others. In addition, we
were trading with Tiger earlier in the year before they closed down. The
commodity traders I dealt with at Tiger (Paul Touradji & Rob Ellis) are in
the process of setting up their own hedge fund and will trade with us again
in late Autumn once they get their paper work in order.

2000 Hedge Fund Origination Summary

Tiger   $112,000  (began trading in Dec 99 and stopped in Mar 00)
Tudor   $384,700 (began trading in Mar 00)
Ospraie  $589,940 (began trading in May 00)

Total year to date $1,086,640 (My budget est for 2000 is approx $2mm)

I've attached two files. The first is a spread sheet with all our hedge fund
trades year to date in detail. In there you will see a tab for work in
progress, these are the funds I am targeting to get signed on for trading
with us and the state of play with each.  The second is a word document
listing the hedge funds I have had contact with.  While the Hedge Fund
universe is large, 1500-2000 easily, the ones that trade commodities and more
specifically trade OTC rather than futures are limited. The entire universe
is probably no more than 30-50 names, many of which are too small to bother
with. For the most part I look for them to have $100mm under management since
the allocation to energy commodities is usually a small percent of that, e.g.
10-15%. A few of them, however, specialize in commodities and represent my
priority target clients.

Per


Like we talked about in our meeting in August, I am  planning on?getting
material out for discussion on the Friday preceding the  NEON meeting.? If it
would help you to get it sooner, let me know so we can  see what would help.?
Also, if you can't open the attachment (it is written  in Microsoft Word),
let me know so that we can again do whatever's necessary to  get it to you.
?
Keep me in touch with how things are going for your  group; successes,
problems, etc.? I'll be praying for your  groups.
?
In Him,
?
Bobby
 - NEON Measuring Success Lesson 1.doc


ISC - Customer Service Survey Ticket#HD0000000650010, Password Reset

: Thank you for taking the time to fill out our Customer Service Survey.
Your input is crucial to our continued efforts in establishing and providing you with World Class Support.

Please take a minute and complete the 5 question survey then submit it back to us when you are done.

Once again, thank you for your participation.

ISC Customer Care Group

http://rc.enron.com/survey/survey_1.asp?id=000000000002507


here you go guys.  This is the basic term sheet - it doesn't stipulate much
about the gas - the contract will do that..


Start Date: 4/27/01; HourAhead hour: 18;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042718.txt


engineer through and through....he cracks me up
---------------------- Forwarded by Monique Sanchez/HOU/ECT on 05/01/2001 02:15 PM ---------------------------

"John Menconi" <jmenconi@adv-eng-ser-inc.com> on 05/01/2001 12:16:43 PM
Please respond to <jmenconi@adv-eng-ser-inc.com>
To:	<Monique.Sanchez@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:	RE: rentcheck rentcheck rentcheck rentcheck

We'll prepare it tonight and send it tomorrow.

-----Original Message-----
From: Monique.Sanchez@enron.com [mailto:Monique.Sanchez@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 11:02 AM
To: jmenconi@adv-eng-ser-inc.com
Subject: rentcheck rentcheck rentcheck rentcheck


Set up by Don Hawkins/67358


Melba,

We will be making changes to the Spot GTC as well.  I will get the new
versions to you first thing in the morning.

Stacy


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 08/08/2000
11:55 AM ---------------------------

"Shmuel Oren" <OREN@IEOR.Berkeley.edu> on 08/08/2000 08:14:59 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Hello from Vince Kaminski at Enron

Dear Vince
I will be happy to meet with you. Please let me know when you will be here.
I will check among our students who may be interested. I have a Ph.D.
student that is very good but he is still in the pipeline.
Shmuel.
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Shmuel S. Oren, Professor
Dept. of Industrial Engineering
        and Operations Research
4117 Etcheverry Hall
University of California
Berkeley, CA 94720-1777
e-mail: oren@ieor.berkeley.edu
phone: (510) 642-1836 or 5484
Fax:      (510) 642-1403
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

----- Original Message -----
From: <vkamins@ect.enron.com>
To: <OREN@queue.IEOR.Berkeley.EDU>; <vkamins@enron.com>;
<ashley.baxter@enron.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2000 10:59 AM
Subject: Hello from Vince Kaminski at Enron

> Shmuel,
>
> I hope you remember me. I visited you together with Aram Sogomonian, a
> good friend of mine, a few years ago. I am currently responsible, among
> other things, for recruiting graduates with finance and/or technical
> backgrounds at the University of Berkeley. I would be glad to give you a
> call and talk more about the details of our program. My colleague,
> AshleyBaxter, from the Analyst/Associate Program at Enron would join me
> as well.
>
> I am sending you a copy of the brochure about the Analyst / Associate
> Program.
>
> Vince Kaminski
>
>
> Vincent Kaminski
> Managing Director - Research
> Enron Corp.
> 1400 Smith Street
> Room EB1962
> Houston, TX 77002-7361
>
> Phone: (713) 853 3848
> Fax  :  (713) 646 2503
> E-mail: vkamins@enron.com
>


Sean,

Thanks. I appreciate it. Try David Port or Bjorn Hagelman.

Vince

Sean Grady@ENRON
07/25/2000 03:51 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Interview schedule for Bruce James

I scheduled Bill Bradford for Bruce James but was unable to schedule Ted
Murphy.  Is there anybody that could replace Mr. Murphy as an interviewer?

Vince J Kaminski@ECT
07/25/2000 03:24 PM
To: Sean Grady/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Interview schedule for Bruce James

Sean,

Can we add Ted Murphy and Bill Bradford to the list of interviewers?

Vince Kaminski


I spoke with Karthik this morning about our offer, and answered some additional questions that he had.  He has accepted our offer, but with one additional request.  He would now like for us to ship his car.  I asked him why he couldn't drive it down here, and he said that it was too old.   I am going to check with Relocation for an approximate cost and will get back to you....

Thanks,
Molly
x34804


Debra and Dan -

Attached is a worksheet for a Master Physical with City of Long Beach,
California.  Could you please prepare a draft and send to:

  Mr. Chris Garner
  City of Long Beach
  2400 E. Spring St.
  Long Beach, CA 90806

Please email a copy to me, Kim Ward, and Russell Diamond.

Thanks,

Jay


The article on our diminished trading is scary.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Sooter, Lea
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 4:26 PM
To:	Grube, Raimund; Gimble, Mathew; Krause, Greg; Krimsky, Steven; Moore, John; Sole III, Carlos; Robinson, Mitch
Subject:	Enron mentions 112701 4 p.m.

Enron Fights To Find Near-Term Sellers,But Still Trading
Dow Jones Energy Service, 11/27/01
USA: UPDATE 3-Dynegy says in talks on Enron merger structure.
Reuters English News Service, 11/27/01
RPT Dynegy confirms in talks on structure of Enron merger deal
AFX News, 11/27/01
Merger Traders Wary Even If Enron, Dynegy Cut New Terms
Dow Jones News Service, 11/27/01
Dynegy confirms in talks on structure of Enron merger deal
AFX News, 11/27/01
STOCKWATCH Enron slightly higher on hopes for new deal price
AFX News, 11/27/01
IN THE MONEY: Hedge Funds Say Yes To New Enron Terms
Dow Jones News Service, 11/27/01
Dynegy Confirms Talks On Enron Deal Structure - Source
Dow Jones News Service, 11/27/01
USA: Enron shares down despite talk of new Dynegy deal.
Reuters English News Service, 11/27/01
Enron Credit Rating to Remain Unchanged for Today, Moody's Says
Bloomberg, 11/27/01

Enron Turned Down by Investors Alwaleed, Blackstone, Carlyle
Bloomberg, 11/27/01

Liberty Funds Analyst Paik Comments on Dynegy and Enron Talks
Bloomberg, 11/27/01

A.G. Edwards Analyst Heim Comments on Dynegy and Enron Talks
Bloomberg, 11/27/01

Commerzbank Analyst Meade Comments on Dynegy's Talks With Enron
Bloomberg, 11/27/01

ENRON SHARES RECOVER FROM A.M. SLUMP
CBS.MarketWatch.com, 11/27/01

Enron In Free Fall
Forbes.com

Enron Fights To Find Near-Term Sellers,But Still Trading
By Mark Golden
Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES

11/27/2001
Dow Jones Energy Service
(Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)
NEW YORK -(Dow Jones)- Enron Corp. (ENE) continued to struggle Tuesday to find willing sellers of near-term gas and power in North America, but the one-time market maker was still able to trade on a limited basis, according to market sources.
"It's not getting any better," said one major energy broker.
Many energy trading companies aren't selling to Enron and are only buying from it near-term. These include Aquila Inc. (ILA), Mirant (MIR), Royal Dutch/Shell Group (RD) subsidiary Coral Energy, Sempra Energy (SRE), and Morgan Stanley Dean Witter's energy trading subsidiary, said the broker. The broker estimated Enron's over-the-counter trading volume to be about 25% of what it was a month ago. Companies are willing to buy from Enron in the spot gas and power markets, because taking delivery on commodity and paying for it a month later poses no credit risk for the buyer.
Some other companies, like Dynegy Inc. (DYN), Duke Energy Corp. (DUK) and BP PLC. (BP), continue to trade with Enron fairly freely, the broker said. Dynegy has reached an agreement to acquire Enron, though the terms of that deal are being renegotiated. The trading subsidiaries of troubled California utility-holding companies PG&E Corp. (PCG) and Edison International (EIX) also are trading with Enron.
The third and largest group of companies are trading with Enron on a very limited basis to reduce exposure by taking off-setting trades against deals done long ago. These include El Paso Corp. (EPG), Reliant Resources (RRI), Tractebel SA's (B.TRB) U.S. trading unit and regulated utilities, the broker said.
Several energy traders said that both power and gas were being sold at prices lower than Enron was offering.
"They've been cut off from so many people," said one electricity trader.
Enron Says Just Slight Reduction In Transactions

An Enron spokesman said he has seen a slight reduction in transactions but not to 25% of the one-month-ago level.
The notional value of Enron's 30-day rolling average of transactions is $2.8 billion, said Enron spokesman Eric Thode. Thode declined to give volume data for Tuesday or Monday, although the company was giving daily information two weeks ago.
"We're not doing daily information. We're only speaking in terms of 30-day rolling averages. ... It's not fair to speak in terms of daily because of daily volatility," Thode said.
Traders and brokers said they hope Dynegy will offer some kind of guarantee to Enron's trading to restore confidence. But, after Enron's ability to transact took a severe turn for the worse Nov. 20, Dynegy said that the companies must continue to operate independently until their merger is approved and completed.
Energy companies began shying away from Enron over the past month, as concerns about its finances precipitated a 75% drop in its stock price and left its bonds trading at levels typically associated with junk-rated debt.
But Enron saw its ability to trade seriously damaged last week following the late release of its quarterly financial report with the U.S. Securities Exchange Commission. For the first time since Enron's troubles began a month ago, energy companies stopped selling to Enron in the spot markets for fear that Enron might not be able to pay its bills as soon as next month based on the quarterly filing.
Moody's Investors Service and Standard & Poor's all rate Enron one notch above speculative grade. Moody's has Enron's ratings on review for a downgrade, and S&P has Enron on negative credit watch. Fitch calls Enron's credit rating "evolving." Enron's ability to do business in the energy markets depends on its maintaining investment-grade ratings.
-By Mark Golden, Dow Jones Newswires; 201-938-4604; mark.golden@dowjones.com
(John Edmiston in Houston and Jon Kamp in Chicago also contributed to this article.)

Copyright ? 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
USA: UPDATE 3-Dynegy says in talks on Enron merger structure.
By C. Bryson Hull

11/27/2001
Reuters English News Service
(C) Reuters Limited 2001.
HOUSTON, Nov 27 (Reuters) - Energy trader Dynegy Inc. confirmed on Tuesday it was in talks with floundering rival Enron Corp. over their proposed merger, as sources familiar with the negotiations indicated the final buyout price may be slashed some 40 percent.
"I can confirm that we are in discussions with the parties involved in the transaction related to the deal," Dynegy spokesman John Sousa told Reuters. He declined to give further details.
Dynegy had planned to buy its Houston rival for $9 billion in stock and is currently in a "due diligence" examination of Enron's complex financial books that began before the Thanksgiving holiday last Thursday.
The buyout offer, finalized Nov. 9, would have had Dynegy paying about $10.41 for each share of Enron, but Enron's shares have since cratered to near $4, stoking investor fears the merger will not go through as planned - if at all.
The stock exchange ratio under discussion could fall from the originally proposed valuation of 0.2685 of each Dynegy share for each Enron share to around 0.15 instead, sources familiar with the matter told Reuters. Enron is willing to accept the lower valuation, given the pressure on its stock price, the sources said.
Enron's shares bounced on Dynegy's confirmation of the restructuring talks, trading up 22 cents at $4.23 in late afternoon action on the New York Stock Exchange. The shares had dipped as low as $3.84 in late-morning dealings and as high $4.49. Dynegy's shares gained 4.7 percent or $1.83 to move to $41.08 on the NYSE.
Also on the table were negotiations to extend maturation of Enron's debt past the close of the merger, expected in the third quarter of 2002. The sources said an announcement was possible on a new infusion of at least $500 million in cash, which Enron has said it was seeking.
There also seemed to be an accord over who gets first crack at the Northern Natural Gas Pipeline, which would be Dynegy's consolation prize if the deal fell apart, a source said. Published reports have said that investment banks J.P. Morgan and Salomon Smith Barney had already accepted the pipeline as collateral in other loans, and may dispute Dynegy's ownership if the deal breaks up.
"The pipeline is far more valuable than what has already been collateralized. There's a solid earnings stream from that thing," said one source familiar with the discussions.
ONE TRADING UNIT SHUT DOWN
Two sources confirmed to Reuters that Enron's equity trading unit has been told it is being closed and that the roughly 60 employees there are being laid off. Enron was not immediately available for comment.
Those layoffs, part of broader job cuts expected as part of the Dynegy buyout, point to an acute problem for Enron - the loss of volume in its premier trading franchise. Enron's trading partners have been cutting back transactions with North America's largest energy trader because of credit concerns.
"This business is hugely dependent on volumes and volume growth. It is the principal reason that Dynegy is making the deal. If it's worth a lot less then Enron is worth less. It's vital to stop the bleeding in its core trading and marketing business," said Commerzbank analyst Andre Meade.
But as Enron's stock continued to lose value, down over 50 percent since Dynegy's initial bid, it seemed likely the purchase price would fall as well. Enron has seen its market capitalization drop to around $3 billion, from $60 billion at the start of 2001. (additional reporting by Jeff Goldfarb, Janet McGurty and Jonathan Stempel in New York).

Copyright ? 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
RPT Dynegy confirms in talks on structure of Enron merger deal

11/27/2001
AFX News
(c) 2001 by AFP-Extel News Ltd
(Repeating to clarify lead)
NEW YORK (AFX0 - Dynegy Inc confirmed it is in talks with Enron Corp on the terms of their two week-old acquisition deal.
"I can confirm that we are in discussions with the parties involved in the transaction related to the structure of a deal," Dynegy spokesman Steve Stengel said.
Enron declined to comment.
Citing people familiar with the matter, the Wall Street Journal reported today that Enron is in advanced talks with Dynegy to cut the price of the all-stock transaction by more than 40 pct to about 5 bln usd.
Enron is also trying to extend the maturity dates of some of its borrowings to stem a growing liquidity crisis, the Wall Street Journal said.
lwl/gc

Copyright ? 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Merger Traders Wary Even If Enron, Dynegy Cut New Terms
By Christina Cheddar
Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES

11/27/2001
Dow Jones News Service
(Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)
NEW YORK -(Dow Jones)- Even if Dynegy Inc. (DYN) revises the terms of its acquisition of Enron Corp. (ENE), some takeover traders say the stock remains too risky.
Earlier Tuesday, a Dynegy spokesman confirmed the company was in talks to restructure the Enron acquisition. Separately, a person familiar with the negotiations said the talks are centered on creating a package that includes a lower exchange ratio for Enron shareholders, a provision for additional funding for Enron, and the refinancing of Enron's existing debt.
Even with the boost Enron shares have received from the reports, they continue to trade at a sharp discount to the original deal's value. Enron shares recently traded at $4.30, up 29 cents, or 7.2%, while Dynegy shares changed hands at $41.50, up $2.25, or 5.8%.
Under the original terms of the deal, Enron shareholders will receive 0.2685 of a Dynegy for each share outstanding, or $9.47 billion. At current trading levels, Enron shares are at a 61% discount to the offer price.
According to The Wall Street Journal, Dynegy and Enron are contemplating an exchange ratio of less than 0.15 of a Dynegy share, or about $5.29 billion.
The rejiggered deal is an attempt to restore confidence in Enron's ability to carry on its core energy marketing and trading business as the deal moves toward completion, the person said.
As the market waits for more details from the two companies, some say it will take more than a revised offer to provide takeover traders, also known as arbitrageurs, with enough confidence to play the deal in the typical fashion.
Often arbitrageurs bet on pending mergers by selling short shares of the acquiring company and buying shares of the target. In this way, the traders hope to profit as the target's share price moves toward the buyer's offer.
But according to some traders, there is too much risk, even for those accustomed to uncertainty, to play the Dynegy-Enron deal in this way.
Several traders said they were still wary that the deal could collapse and potentially push Enron into bankruptcy.
Enron's fortunes took a sharp turn for the worst after investors began to realize the company liberally used accounting loopholes to move its debts into off-balance-sheet financing vehicles, including partnerships run by its former chief financial officer, Andrew Fastow.
"There's nothing like accounting to scare people," said one trader, who said there is still a perception in the market that there is more bad news yet to come from Enron.
-By Christina Cheddar, Dow Jones Newswires; 201-938-5166; christina.cheddar@dowjones.com

Copyright ? 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Dynegy confirms in talks on structure of Enron merger deal

11/27/2001
AFX News
(c) 2001 by AFP-Extel News Ltd
NEW YORK (AFX0 - Dynegy Inc confirmed it is in talks with Enron Corp to renegotiate the terms of a deal with Dynegy Inc in an attempt to save their two week-old acquisition deal.
"I can confirm that we are in discussions with the parties involved in the transaction related to the structure of a deal," Dynegy spokesman Steve Stengel said.
Enron, meanwhile, declined to comment on the report.
Citing people familiar with the matter, the Wall Street Journal reported that Enron Corp is in advanced talks with Dynegy to cut the price of the all-stock transaction by more than 40 pct to about 5 bln usd.
Enron is also trying to extend the maturity dates of some of its borrowings to stem a growing liquidity crisis, the Wall Street Journal said.
lwl/gc

Copyright ? 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
STOCKWATCH Enron slightly higher on hopes for new deal price

11/27/2001
AFX News
(c) 2001 by AFP-Extel News Ltd
NEW YORK (AFX) - Shares of Enron Corp were slightly higher in midsession trade on reports that the company is trying to renegotiate the terms of a deal with Dynegy Inc, by cutting the price of the all-stock transaction to 5 bln usd, or 40 pct, from 9 bln usd, dealers said.
At 12.19 pm, amid broad declines in the market, Enron shares were trading up 5 cents at 4.04 usd. Dynegy was up 1.26 usd, or 3.26 pct, at 40.51.
The DJIA was down 111.48 points at 9,871.28. The S&P 500 was down 10.40 points at 1,147.02. The Nasdaq composite was down 20.25 points at 1,920.98.
Earlier, the Wall Street Journal said Enron was in advanced talks with Dynegy in an attempt to salvage their two week-old acquisition deal. The companies are discussing a new price for the all-paper deal, following the sharp fall in Enron's share price of the past few weeks.
Enron had hoped to finalise the deal and make an announcement yesterday that would calm investors -- the shares are trading at a small fraction of their record high last year of 87.50 usd.
As of today, however, the revised deal still has not been formalised.
The current agreement with Dynegy contains a "material adverse change" clause, which could be invoked to call the deal off.
As part of its due diligence, Dynegy is examining details of Enron's filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission last week, which reportedly contained information it had not received previously.
"Enron is a black hole, and I don't know how deep the bottom is," said Fadel Gheit an analyst at Fahnestock & Co.
Only four weeks ago, Enron's stock was trading at the 8 usd mark, Gheit said, noting that if the Dynegy had done their homework the stock would not have continued to collapse.
"The market sees this and somebody has to figure out the potential exposure, it could be several billion dollars," said Gheit.
If the deal is to go through then the two companies must arrive at a new stock-exchange ratio, said Gheit. Under the current acquisition agreement, Dynegy would exchange 0.2685 share for each Enron share tendered.
According to the Wall Street Journal, the new ratio is expected to be less than 0.15 share of Dynegy stock for every share of Enron stock, which would value Enron at less than 6 usd a share, or about 5 bln usd.
blms/cl/gc

Copyright ? 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
IN THE MONEY: Hedge Funds Say Yes To New Enron Terms
By Carol S. Remond

11/27/2001
Dow Jones News Service
(Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)
A Dow Jones Newswires Column

NEW YORK -(Dow Jones)- News that Enron Corp. (ENE) and would-be suitor and savior Dynegy Inc. (DYN) are working to renegotiate their merger agreement has done little to assuage market jitters about Enron's fate.
And so far, even professional arbitrageurs, who normally thrive on placing bets on whether a merger is going to go through, continue for the most part to stay clear of Enron's stock and bonds because of the uncertainty surrounding the once mighty energy trader.
Still, reports that the equity swap ratio offered by Dynegy could be revised down to below 0.15 from 0.2685, has some hedge funds, often willing to take more risks, looking to place trades on the deal.
"We're trying to figure out a good play," said a trader at a New York hedge fund.
So far, bets under consideration seem to be those that would include a combination of stock and debt trading, somehow hedging a short position on Enron's shares with a long position in some of its bonds.
"People that are playing the debt are definitely playing the stock against it," a hedge fund manager at another fund said. This manager added, "We're still trying to evaluate different risk/reward scenario on the debt and equity sides."
Investors that sell stock short borrow shares in the hopes of replacing them later by purchasing them at a lower price.
Arbitrageurs typically sell short shares of the acquirer, while taking long positions in the stock of the target company. But there is nothing typical about Enron's financial woes and the rescue efforts launched by Dynegy and large banks like J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. and Citigroup Inc.
Traders reported increased activity in the still mostly illiquid Enron debt market. "Some bids are coming in, especially on the lower priced bonds," said a trader at a large New York investment bank that makes a market in Enron's bonds.
Enron bonds, which had fallen in value in recent weeks, gained five to seven points early Tuesday as investors continue to await confirmation from Enron and Dynegy that their merger deal remains on track, albeit at a lower price. Enron's 6.4% bonds due 2004 were recently trading at about 55 cents on the dollar, up from 48 cents Monday.
Under the original terms of the deal, Enron holders would have gotten 0.2685 of Dynegy shares for each of their Enron shares. Quoting people close to the discussions, The Wall Street Journal reported Tuesday that the new ratio is expected to be less than 0.15 share of Dynegy stock for every share of Enron stock. That lower exchange was also mentioned in a Dow Jones Newswires story last Friday. At current prices a 0.15 exchange ratio would value Enron at less than $6 a share.
Essentially this new value, if true, means that it has now become easier for hedge funds and other risk takers to play the merger odds.
When a hedge fund shorting Enron stock at $4 a share risked losing more than $6 if the merger went through at the 0.2685 ratio, it now stands to lose only $2 a share (based on the $6 value of Enron stock under the new 0.15 ratio). At the same time it has become much easier to hedge that loss potential by going long on Enron bonds. If the merger doesn't happen, Enron is seen by many as heading for bankruptcy with an ultimate share value of 0. That means that hedge funds shorting Enron at $4 stand to benefit by that amount.
Hedge fund managers and traders said that current thinking puts the value of Enron bonds at about 20 cents on the dollar if the merger fails and about 80 cents on the dollar if it goes through. Meanwhile, the value of Enron stock is capped at about $6 a share if the merger goes through with a new conversion ratio of 0.15.
"A lot of the guys are still very skeptical," said a bond trader at a New York bank. "But this is really making the hedge trade easier and we've seen more customers short the stock and buy the bonds."
Still, this type of bets isn't for the faint of heart, and most investors are likely to wait for more news before taking a position.
"We're nibbling a little bit at the bonds right now. But the situation is so volatile that it's difficult to be aggressive," the manager of a large New York hedge fund said.
Carol S. Remond; 201-938-2074; Dow Jones Newswires
carol.remond@dowjones.com

Copyright ? 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Dynegy Confirms Talks On Enron Deal Structure - Source
By Christina Cheddar
Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES

11/27/2001
Dow Jones News Service
(Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)
NEW YORK -(Dow Jones)- Dynegy Inc. (DYN) confirmed the company is in talks with a number of parties regarding the structure of its transaction with Enron Corp. (ENE).
"I can confirm that we are in discussions with the parties involved in the transaction related to the structure of the deal," said John Sousa. "I can't elaborate any further at this time."
An Enron official wasn't immediately to comment.

Earlier Tuesday, a report in The Wall Street Journal quoted people familiar with the matter who said Enron and Dynegy were in advanced discussions to cut the price of the all-stock transaction by more than 40% to about $5 billion. Sousa, the Dynegy spokesman, didn't comment on the newspaper report.
Dynegy shares recently traded at $40, up 75 cents, or 1.9%, while Enron shares changed hands at $3.94, down 7 cents, or 1.7%.
Under the original terms of the transaction, Enron shareholders are to receive 0.2685 of a Dynegy share, or $10.78, for each share outstanding, or about $9.14 billion, based on Dynegy's recent stock price.
According to the Journal report, the new terms could be below 0.15 of a Dynegy share.
The deal is critical for Enron, which also simultaneously carrying out talks to receive between $500 million to $1 billion in additional funding to support its operations, while carrying on negotiations to restructure its debt, which totals about $13 billion.
While Dynegy has already provided Enron with a cash infusion, it is uncertain how long Enron's current funds will allow it to remain solvent.
Meanwhile, a third employee lawsuit has been filed against Enron over lost 401(k) retirement savings due to the recent collapse of Enron's stock, which has declined more than 90% in the trailing 12 months. The suit claims Enron "locked down" the plan, which prevented employees from being able to sell the shares, and seeks $850 million for plan losses.
Although the other recently filed employee suits didn't disclose the amount of compensation the plaintiffs are seeking, it is possible the suits seek a similar level of damages, a CreditSights report said.
If this is true, the CreditSights report said, it is possible the clause that allows Dynegy to walk away from the deal if the liabilities from "pending"' or "threatened" litigation may exceed $3.5 billion may be invoked.
In addition, to the employee lawsuits, more than a dozen shareholder suits have been filed against Enron.
-By Christina Cheddar, Dow Jones Newswires; 201-938-5166; christina.cheddar@dowjones.com

The discussions between Enron and Dynegy aren't merely focused on revising the consideration Dynegy will pay. They are also aimed at providing Enron with additional funding and at restructuring its debt, said a person familiar with the negotiations.
The moves are aimed at restoring confidence in Enron and relieving "the perceived liquidity crisis," the source said.
-By Christina Cheddar, Dow Jones Newswires; 201-938-5166; christina.cheddar@dowjones.com

Copyright ? 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
USA: Enron shares down despite talk of new Dynegy deal.

11/27/2001
Reuters English News Service
(C) Reuters Limited 2001.
NEW YORK, Nov 27 (Reuters) - Shares of financially troubled energy trading giant Enron Corp. slipped back into the red on Tuesday after gaining in opening trade following news of a new rescue deal from Dynegy Inc. .
Enron shares were down 2 cents at $3.99 after rising 19 cents, or 4.7 percent, to $4.20 in early dealings on the New York Stock Exchange.
Analysts questioned the viability of the original proposal for Dynegy to acquire Enron in a deal worth about $9 billion.
The Wall Street Journal reported that the companies were discussing reducing the price of the all-stock deal by more than 40 percent, to about $5 billion.

Copyright ? 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Enron Credit Rating to Remain Unchanged for Today, Moody's Says
2001-11-27 16:12 (New York)

Enron Credit Rating to Remain Unchanged for Today, Moody's Says

     New York, Nov. 27 (Bloomberg) -- Enron Corp.'s credit rating
will remain at ``Baa3,'' the lowest investment grade, by Moody's
Investors Service, which said it won't take any ratings action
today on the largest energy trading company.

     David Stimpson, Moody's managing director for ratings
communication, said although there was speculation in the market
that Moody's would make a ratings change, the company won't take
any action on Enron today. Stimpson declined further comment.

     Moody's had been expected to make a statement on Enron's
credit as bankers sought to raise as much as $2 billion for the
energy trader in private equity.

     Bankers led by J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. Vice Chairman James B.
Lee have been unable for two weeks to raise the money because of
concern Enron won't be able to meet its obligations. That concern
was heightened after Enron disclosed a $690 million payment due
this week. Enron needs the money to operate as it completes an
acquisition by Dynegy Inc.

Enron Turned Down by Investors Alwaleed, Blackstone, Carlyle
2001-11-27 15:16 (New York)

Enron Turned Down by Investors Alwaleed, Blackstone, Carlyle

     New York, Nov. 27 (Bloomberg) -- Enron Corp.'s bankers,
seeking to raise as much as $2 billion for the energy trader, have
been turned down by investors including Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal,
the Carlyle Group Inc. and Blackstone Group LP.

     ``I was approached by several people to invest in the
company, but we declined,'' said Alwaleed, a billionaire investor
from Saudi Arabia. The fall in Enron's shares, which have declined
95 percent this year, didn't necessarily make it a good
investment, he said.

     Bankers led by J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. Vice Chairman James B.
Lee have been unable for two weeks to raise the money because of
concern Enron won't be able to meet its obligations. That concern
was heightened after Enron disclosed a $690 million payment due
this week. Enron needs the money to operate as it completes an
acquisition by Dynegy Inc.

     The prospect that Enron will fail to line up financing,
jeopardizing its plan to be acquired by Dynegy, has weighed on its
stock and bonds. The company's securities gained today as talks
between Enron and Dynegy to renegotiate terms of the transaction
convinced some investors the takeover was more likely to take
place.

     Enron 6.4 percent bonds that mature in 2006, which closed
yesterday at 48 cents on the dollar, rebounded to trade at about
55 cents on the dollar. At that price, the bonds yield 22.5
percent. Enron shares rose 21 cents, or 5 percent, to $4.22. The
stock finished yesterday at $4.01, its lowest level in 14 years.

                        Declining to Invest

     J.P. Morgan and Citigroup Inc., Enron's largest lenders, plan
to provide $250 million to Enron each as part of a $2 billion
package. The bankers have been seeking additional investments,
which would be made in the form of convertible stock, for more
than two weeks.

     Questor Management Co., a $1 billion private-equity fund that
invests in troubled companies, and buyout funds such as Carlyle
Group and Blackstone have balked at investing, said people
familiar with the situation. Blackstone and Questor declined to
comment. Christopher Ullman, a spokesman for Carlyle, said: ``We
are not in discussions with Enron about financing.''

   ``More equity would leave Enron with a stronger balance sheet,
which should reassure their trading partners,'' said Kathleen
Vuchetich, who helps manage $1.4 billion in assets at the Strong
American Utilities Fund. Vuchetich has 4.2 percent of her
portfolio invested in Dynegy shares.

     Enron and Dynegy discussed revising the terms of their merger
over the weekend, said Steve Stengel, spokesman for Dynegy. Dynegy
is now talking about paying less than 0.15 share for each of
Enron's, valuing the company's equity at about $5 billion, or less
than $6 per share, the Wall Street Journal reported, citing people
close to the discussions.

                               Terms

     ``The concern is that the Dynegy deal breaks down,'' said
Paul Tice, co-head of U.S. high-grade credit research who covers
the energy market for Deutsche Bank.

     Current terms call for an exchange ratio of 0.2685 share of
Dynegy stock for each Enron share. Given recent disclosures about
Enron's debt and the drop in the stock price, a fairer ratio would
be 0.15 share of Dynegy, said Ronald Barone, a UBS Warburg analyst
who rates Dynegy a ``strong buy.''

    Under current terms, the deal makes sense for Dynegy only if
Enron earns 85 cents or more next year, said Gordon Howald, an
analyst at Credit Lyonnais who rates Dynegy a ``buy.'' UBS
Warburg's Barone has reduced his estimate of Enron's 2002 earnings
to 75 cents a share from $1.65.

     Enron needs an infusion in part because it has $9 billion of
payments due before the end of 2002 and less than $2 billion in
cash and credit lines. The decline in reserves has also raised the
prospect that Moody's Investors Service may cut Enron's credit
rating. A lower rating would trigger $3.9 billion in debt
repayments for two affiliated partnerships.

                           Cash Question

     ``The main question is: `What is the cash position right
now?''' said Tice at Deutsche Bank. ``Is the falloff in the cash
position of the company stabilizing or not?''

     Moody's hasn't issued a report on Enron since the company
filed a quarterly report with the Securities and Exchange
Commission last week announcing it had a $690 million note due
this week. On Wednesday, Enron got a three-week reprieve from
lenders on the $690 million note and closed on a $450 million
credit line. Dynegy Chief Executive Officer Chuck Watson said he
was ``encouraged'' by the developments.

Liberty Funds Analyst Paik Comments on Dynegy and Enron Talks
2001-11-27 11:56 (New York)

     Boston, Nov. 27 (Bloomberg) -- Edward Paik, an analyst at
Liberty Funds Group, comments on Dynegy Inc.'s proposed
$23 billion acquisition of Enron Corp., the largest energy trader.

     Paik has Enron shares among the $3.6 billion in assets he
helps manage at Liberty.

     Dynegy may renegotiate terms of its bid for Enron, people
familiar with talks between the Houston-based companies said
yesterday.

     ``The stock market is clearly 100 percent certain the Dynegy
deal won't go through as negotiated,'' Paik said. ``We're just
waiting.''

     ``If they announce they've renegotiated the deal, it will be
implicit that due diligence has been done, and that Dynegy won't
walk away for anything that's happened up until now. If they were
to impose more conditions, what good is that? Dynegy needs to
resuscitate Enron back to health.''

A.G. Edwards Analyst Heim Comments on Dynegy and Enron Talks
2001-11-27 11:00 (New York)

     St. Louis, Missouri, Nov. 27 (Bloomberg) -- A.G. Edwards &
Sons Inc. analyst Michael Heim comments on Dynegy Inc.'s proposed
$23 billion buyout of Enron Corp., the largest energy trader.

     Dynegy may renegotiate terms of its bid for Enron, people
familiar with talks between the Houston-based companies said
yesterday. Heim rates Enron ``sell'' and Dynegy ``hold'' and
doesn't own shares of either company.

     The market is waiting for confirmation and details of a
renegotiated bid, Heim said.

     ``We'd need to know why they'd agreed to a new price,'' Heim
said. ``It also needs to be combined with some sort of shoring up
of Enron's trading business, which needs to be stabilized for the
deal to have real value.''

Commerzbank Analyst Meade Comments on Dynegy's Talks With Enron
2001-11-27 10:42 (New York)

     New York, Nov. 27 (Bloomberg) -- Commerzbank Securities
analyst Andre Meade comments on Dynegy Inc.'s proposed
$23 billion buyout of Enron Corp., the largest energy trader.

     Dynegy may renegotiate terms of its bid for Enron, people
familiar with talks between the Houston-based companies said
yesterday. Meade rates both companies ``hold'' and owns no shares.

     ``If they are renegotiating, it confirms our fears that
Enron's crown jewel, its marketing and trading business, is
deteriorating,''

      Investors are waiting for a sign on the state of the
business, Meade said.

      Enron's trading business was worth more than $10 billion
before partners began shunning it on credit concerns, Meade said.
A lower price struck by Dynegy may reveal how much business has
fallen, and whether Dynegy believes Enron can regain it, Meade
said.

     A New York Times report that banks may extend payments on
some loans until after Dynegy purchases Enron ``raises concern
that Dynegy will be hurt by taking on the vast liabilities of
Enron,'' Meade said.

ENRON SHARES RECOVER FROM A.M. SLUMP
By Lisa Sanders
CBS.MarketWatch.com

4:10 PM ET Nov 27, 2001

HOUSTON (CBS.MW) -- Shares of Enron recovered from the morning's sub-$4
a share level Tuesday amid reports that the embattled energy merchant is
working with Dynegy to renegotiate its takeover offer.

Enron (ENE), which once hit $84.88 during the last holiday season,
added 13 cents to close at $4.14 on volume of 68.4 million shares. The
stock was the most actively traded on the New York Stock Exchange
Tuesday.

Dynegy shares added $1.64 to close at $40.89.

The New York Times reported that Houston-based Dynegy (DYN) and Enron
are renegotiating Dynegy's bid, once valued at $9 billion in stock.
According to the report, Dynegy is worried that Enron's core business --
energy trading -- is deteriorating. See full story.

Getting it done

_______________________________________________________________________

Glen Hilton, portfolio manager of the Montgomery New Power Fund, said
it's a "crapshoot" as to whether the deal gets done.

"I think that regardless of the outcome Dynegy is still in a good
position for the long-term," he said. His fund liquidated its Enron
holdings completely in mid to late-October. "Enron was the leader (in
energy trading), and it's clearly suffering so Dynegy is in a good shot
to take up the mantle."

Hilton pointed to Enron's 10-Q, filed last Monday with the Securities
and Exchange Commission, and the falling share price as potential
triggers of the deal's material adverse affect clause. Those two things
could very well make Dynegy walk away from the merger. If that happens,
Hilton said, an Enron bankruptcy is a very real possibility.

"Very few companies understand what Enron does and Dynegy is one of the
few that could make something out of it," Hilton said. "If Dynegy can
restore confidence in Enron's trading business and get Northern Natural
Gas, it looks like it might be worth the headache."

Dynegy has the rights to Enron's Northern Natural Gas, a pipeline
system, whether the merger goes through or not.

Enron wasn't immediately available for comment. Dynegy, through a
company spokesman, confirmed that it was in discussions with "the
parties involved in the transaction" related to the structure of the
deal.

Top Of The News
Enron In Free Fall
Dan Ackman <javascript:newWindow('Ackman')>, Forbes.com <http://www.forbes.com/news>, 11.27.01, 9:00 AM ET

NEW YORK - If not for Sept. 11, Enron would be a major scandal; as it stands, it's a minor scandal. The Houston-based energy company, whose Chairman Kenneth Lay is a personal friend of and top fundraiser for President George W. Bush <http://www.forbes.com/2001/10/12/gwbush.html> and Vice President Dick Cheney, is in free fall. The bailout by rival Dynegy made public three weeks ago appears to be unraveling.

Dynegy's (nyse: DYN <http://www.forbes.com/finance/mktguideapps/compinfo/CompanyTearsheet.jhtml?tkr=DYN> - news <http://www.forbes.com/markets/company_news.jhtml?ticker=DYN> - people <http://www.forbes.com/peopletracker/results.jhtml?startRow=0&name=&ticker=DYN>) buyout of Enron (nyse: ENE <http://www.forbes.com/finance/mktguideapps/compinfo/CompanyTearsheet.jhtml?tkr=ENE> - news <http://www.forbes.com/markets/company_news.jhtml?ticker=ENE> - people <http://www.forbes.com/peopletracker/results.jhtml?startRow=0&name=&ticker=ENE>) was originally valued at $9 billion. But just as the deal was announced, Enron said its prior financial reporting was inaccurate and that it had overstated earnings by $586 million over the past four years.

While the companies have not said the merger is off, investors don't believe it will happen, at least not at the stated price; they have bid Enron shares down to the point where the company has a market value of less than $3 billion. The shares closed yesterday at $4.01, down from $78 a year ago.

The situation is in flux, as it has been for months. During that time, several top Enron executives have been forced to resign. Jeffrey Skilling, Enron's former chief executive officer, left in August for "personal reasons."

Company officials said they hope to announce, perhaps as early as today, a series of changes: a lower price for the takeover; a cash infusion of $500 million; new, extended loan terms by Enron's bankers; and somehow, an agreement that prevents Dynegy from walking away in the face of litigation over Enron's devastated employee-retirement plan. Lawsuits by shareholders are sure to follow, considering Enron's restatement and the pay it lavished on executives, including Lay who received $135 million from salary, bonus and the exercise of stock options in 2000 alone.

For now, Dynegy says it still wants to do a deal for its crosstown rival with 2000 revenue of $101 billion.

Even more alarming than the deterioration in the share price is the crisis of confidence in Enron's reliability as a trading partner in worldwide energy markets. Last year, Enron was the dominant player in natural gas and electricity trading--a fast-paced, complex business quite removed from the company's history as a gas- and oil-pipeline builder and operator. The fear now is that other companies will refuse to trade with Enron out of trepidation that it will file for bankruptcy and not pay its bills.

The company had $10.5 billion in debt as of its last annual report, and that number has likely grown by 20%. Already, credit agencies have cut their ratings on Enron debt.

Dynegy and its partner, ChevronTexaco (nyse: CVX <http://www.forbes.com/finance/mktguideapps/compinfo/CompanyTearsheet.jhtml?tkr=CVX> - news <http://www.forbes.com/markets/company_news.jhtml?ticker=CVX> - people <http://www.forbes.com/peopletracker/results.jhtml?startRow=0&name=&ticker=CVX>), may pump billions of dollars into Enron's operations if the purchase goes through. But the deal will certainly undergo regulatory scrutiny and will take months to close. Investors and energy traders are increasingly doubtful that Enron can hang on by itself.

Enron bills itself as one of the world's leading energy, commodities and services companies. It says it "markets electricity and natural gas, delivers energy and other physical commodities, and provides financial and risk management services to customers around the world." While all this may be true, its popularity with investors was based largely on its fast-growing revenue--much like the Internet companies whose collapse it mirrors.

Few shareholders had any understanding of what Enron did to generate that revenue, and indeed Enron's own auditors at Arthur Andersen were confused. Most of the revenue was generated from trading, but the company's shares sold as if it was still an industrial company and not a financial firm.

Enron was famous for being famous. Before the start of the 2000 baseball season, it purchased the rights to have its name on Houston's new ballpark. By 2002, Enron Field may need a new name.

The name Enron itself sounds like it has something to do with energy, but it means nothing. At the time the company was formed from the merger of InterNorth of Omaha and Houston Natural Gas, the idea was to call the company Enteron. But the namers then looked in the dictionary and found out that Enteron means "intestines;" they decided to drop the "te" in the middle and go with Enron. Soon Enron may be part of Dynegy, a much smaller company in terms of revenue. If the deal falls apart, it may want to go back to Enteron.


Thanks a bunch for your help with this.


Deliveries and redeliveries will still be 0 effective 3/29/01at 9:00 am.
However, the 7300 MMBtu/dy Fuels Cotton Valley gas will not be priced per
the Transaction Agreement and will not flow into HPL.
----- Forwarded by Marta K Henderson/Houston/PEFS/PEC on 03/28/01 03:10 PM
-----

                    Marta K
                    Henderson            To:     briley@enron.com, carlos.j.rodriguez@enron.com, Connie
                                         Wester/EastTexas/PEFS/PEC@PEC, dfarmer@enron.com, Daniel C
                    03/28/01             Rider/Houston/PEFS/PEC@PEC, Darrel F. Bane/EastTexas/PEFS/PEC@PEC, Donna
                    08:07 AM             C. Spencer/GCS/CEC/PEC@PEC, Donna J Dobb/Houston/PEFS/PEC@PEC, John A.
                                         Bretz/GCS/CEC/PEC@PEC, John C Lehman/Field/PEFS/PEC@PEC, Julia A.
                                         Urbanek/GCS/CEC/PEC@PEC, Lee C. Spivey/Field/PEFS/PEC@PEC, Michael R.
                                         Cherry/EastTexas/PEFS/PEC@PEC, Poe Reed/GCS/CEC/PEC@PEC, Ronald C.
                                         Douglas/GCS/CEC/PEC@PEC, Sharon Beemer/Houston/PEFS/PEC@PEC, William E.
                                         Speckels/GCS/CEC/PEC@PEC
                                         cc:
                                         Subject:     Eastrans Nomination change effective 3/29/01

Please decrease deliveries to Eastrans to 0 MMBtu/dy effective 3/29/01 and
maintain at 0 until further notified.

The redeliveries will be 0 as well.

Fuels Cotton Valley gas will be valued per Paragraph 3 of the Contract
Price (per MMBtu) section in the Transaction Agreement.


Since 99% of the deals that we did in Calgary were financial, one of the biggest problems we encountered was the last day of true ups at month end. Because we cannot capture the last day of the month right now, as the volume of financial deals grow (assuming it will), it is possible we could be dealing with fairly large PMA adjustments.

We may need to start thinking about a way that we could capture these numbers.

John


Stinson,

Yes, makes perfect sense. Brad can start the process.

Vince

Stinson Gibner
03/10/2000 02:15 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Green card for Paulo

Vince:

Now that Paulo is a manager, I think we can start the process for trying to
get him a permanent resident status.

Should I contact Brad McSherry about this?

--Stinson


Soma,

Per your request, I've calculated a Houston Area notional swap price for 6/01 through 12/04.  I used  the IF-Katy mid curve as of today's close and have not adjusted for any injection or withdrawal charges that may need to be accounted for in your analysis.  If you need any further help, please let me know.

Thanks,

Charlie Weldon