Greetings:
Looks like our respective sources are tracking pretty well.

Best,
Jeff

	Kristin Walsh/ENRON@enronXgate
	07/23/2001 01:51 PM

		 To: John J Lavorato/ENRON@enronXgate, Louise Kitchen/ENRON@enronXgate, David
W Delainey/HOU/EES@EES
		 cc: Christopher F Calger/ENRON@enronXgate, Christian Yoder/ENRON@enronXgate,
Steve C Hall/ENRON@enronXgate, Mike Swerzbin/ENRON@enronXgate, Phillip K
Allen/ENRON@enronXgate, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Chris
Gaskill/ENRON@enronXgate, Mike Grigsby/ENRON@enronXgate, Tim
Heizenrader/ENRON@enronXgate, Vince J Kaminski/ENRON@enronXgate, Steven J
Kean/ENRON@enronXgate, Rob Milnthorp/ENRON@enronXgate, Kevin M
Presto/ENRON@enronXgate, Claudio Ribeiro/ENRON@enronXgate, Richard
Shapiro/ENRON@enronXgate, James D Steffes/ENRON@enronXgate, Mark
Tawney/ENRON@enronXgate, Scott Tholan/ENRON@enronXgate, Britt
Whitman/ENRON@enronXgate, Lloyd Will/ENRON@enronXgate, Alan
Comnes/ENRON@enronXgate, Rogers Herndon/ENRON@enronXgate, James W
Lewis/HOU/EES@EES, Don Black/HOU/EES@EES, Ray Alvarez/NA/Enron@ENRON, Kelly
Holman/ENRON@enronXgate, Mark Dana Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fletcher J
Sturm/ENRON@enronXgate, Doug Gilbert-Smith/ENRON@enronXgate, Richard B
Sanders/Enron@enronXgate, Andrew Edison/ENRON@enronXgate, Kelly
Holman/ENRON@enronXgate, Nancy Turner/ENRON@enronXgate, Tim
Belden/ENRON@enronXgate, John Brindle/ENRON@enronXgate, David
Cromley/ENRON@enronXgate
		 Subject: California Update 7/23/01

? When the Assembly reconvenes at 4:00 PDT it appears they will likely take
up the budget only; there is no word at this time that they will take up AB
82XX, and they do not appear to have the votes needed to pass it even if they
did take it up.  The fact that Burton has come out against a conference
committee is an additional disincentive to work on 82XX.  Therefore, at this
time it appears unlikely that 82XX will be passed before the recess.

? Instead, it appears likely that a working group will be established to work
on SB 78XX during the recess.  This group will likely include members of
Keeley's, Hertzberg's and Burton's staffs.  These staff members may be
allowed to go on vacation for a few weeks before returning to work on the MOU.

? The Assembly must pass the budget before they can recess.  It is unclear at
this time if it will be possible to do so tonight or if it will take a few
days; the Senate, by leaving, has put the Assembly in a difficult position in
that they cannot amend anything.  Also, the four Republicans who voted for
the budget last week are under significant pressure not to vote for the
trailer bills, meaning that Speaker Hertzberg has to find other Republicans
willing to cross party lines -- a difficult and very unpopular thing to do at
this point.  This is likely why the Assembly is meeting so late in the day --
to allow Hertzberg time to work on the 8 or 9 Republicans on his list.


Just wanted to let you know that the Richardson deal has been entered into
TAGG.  The deal number is NE2760.


This is just a reminder for our conference call at 9:00 am Wednesday.  We
will call Patrick Smith from a conference room down here.  See you tomorrow.
Ben


Doug,
The Sitara numbers for both of these deals are in the comments section of
each deal in Tagg.  Do you have access to Tagg Deal Capture?  The Sitara
numbers are 344737 (NS3520) and 344952&343785 (NS4159).  If you don't know
where to look for these, let me know.  They were both available in the
systems.

DG    3-9573

Doug Nelson@ENRON
10/19/2000 09:20 AM
To: Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Lisa Valderrama/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: OA Analysis

Darron,

I have two TAGG #'s for which I need the associated SITARA #'s.
This relates to Duke Energy Trading & Marketing, LLC., 8/00 sales.

 1.  NS3520.1
 2.  NS4159.1

Thanks for your help.
Doug
3-0560


Can you please add this to the general write-up for each ISO?  Thanks

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ibrahim, Amr
Sent:	Friday, November 09, 2001 8:17 AM
To:	Steffes, James D.
Subject:	RE: Credit Worthiness - Particiaption Requirements - ISOs

Jim:

Yes we can.  The accepted forms of guarantees (financial assurance in PJM parlance) are:

1.	cash deposits
2.	letter of credit
3.	surety bond, or
4.	corporate guaranty

Brgrds

AI

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Steffes, James D.
Sent:	Friday, November 09, 2001 8:12 AM
To:	Ibrahim, Amr
Subject:	RE: Credit Worthiness - Particiaption Requirements - ISOs

Amr --

Can we use cash as collateral for PJM??

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ibrahim, Amr
Sent:	Thursday, November 08, 2001 5:40 PM
To:	Steffes, James D.; Kingerski, Harry; Ogenyi, Gloria
Cc:	Shapiro, Richard
Subject:	Credit Worthiness - Particiaption Requirements - ISOs

Kindly find a memorandum summarizing the credit worthiness parameters in the functioning ISOs in the US and Canada that was prepared by the Risk Analytics Group.  ERCOT is still outstanding and shall send you an update as soon as it is ready.

The seminal documents-in hard copies-- for this summary are also available at your request.

Please let me know if you have any question.

Brgrds

AI

 << File: ISOs Credit PolicyI.doc >>


Please follow up with Lou on this.  It sounds like something the commercial
people would be in a good position to answer, so maybe start by finding out
if they are already responding, either through Lou or otherwise.  Then get
the right people to review and supplement this list.  Thanks. df
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 11/08/2000
12:29 PM ---------------------------

11/08/2000 11:06 AM
Louis Soldano
Louis Soldano
Louis Soldano
11/08/2000 11:06 AM
11/08/2000 11:06 AM
To: John Shafer/OTS/Enron, Janet Place/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Molly
Sample/Houston/Eott@Eott, David Johnson/EU/Enron@Enron, David L
Johnson/OTS/Enron@ENRON, David Bush/ECF/Enron@ENRON, Mark
Cartwright/ECF/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dorothy
McCoppin/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Don Hawkins/OTS/Enron@Enron
cc: Phil Lowry/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Shelley Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, James
Prentice/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Colleen Raker/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michael
Moran/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: ETS Products/Services

EHS Corporate has asked we verify this inventory of services/products  from
all of the various companies that fit under the very broadest form of the ETS
umbrella.  I offer the following thoughts:  I don't believe EOTT has any
relationship with the Mt. Belvieu storage operations; I don't know if we
purchase natural gas except for fuel purposes; do we currently have any gas
gathering facilities?? or just transmission??; EOTT Fleet Vehicles could be
better defined; Risk Management services??

Feedback would be extremely helpful before the 17th
---------------------- Forwarded by Louis Soldano/ET&S/Enron on 11/08/2000
10:53 AM ---------------------------
From: Susan Worthen@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 11/07/2000 10:00 AM
To: Louis Soldano/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: ETS Products/Services

Lou,

This is a follow-up to a meeting we had about 2 months ago on Life Cycle
Impact Assessments.  The 1st phase of the assessment involves completing an
inventory of Enron's products\services and volumes.  I am currently
requesting each business unit to verify the products and services we have
identified and make any modifications to the list.  I am enlisting your
assistance to do this for ETS, including EOTT.  I need to have the
verification completed by 11/17. Please advise if you have any questions.

Thanks,
Susan Worthen
Director
Environmental Compliance, Enron Corp
713/646-6579  713/345-6164 fax
3AC 1525


sorry that conversation was depressing me


ditto.  work is it.  i am going to vegas this weekend, so i got that going
for me.


thanks for the update on the Cougar.  I need to try and see him this weekend.


Thur will be fine.

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	07/03/01 01:03 PM

		 To: Paul Kaufman/ENRON@enronXgate, Leslie Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: FW: California state regulatory matters

thanks, paul.  apologies, i dont' even remember seeing this.  leslie, can we
discuss on thursday.  i  can update you on everything underway w.r.t. cal
gas.  thursday work for you?

best,
jeff

	Paul Kaufman/ENRON@enronXgate
	07/03/2001 10:22 AM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: California state regulatory matters

Knowing your swamped and all ... did you respond to this e-mail or contact
Phillip Allen?

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Lawner, Leslie
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 11:00 AM
To: Kaufman, Paul; Dasovich, Jeff; Steffes, James
Cc: Kingerski, Harry; Cantrell, Rebecca; Fulton, Donna; Allen, Phillip K.
Subject: California state regulatory matters

Paul and Jeff,

Becky, Donna and I (gas girls) met with Phillip Allen (ENA West) to discuss
FERC gas issues today, and Phillip had some issues that were more state than
federal, and I told him I would bring them to your attention.

He is interested in seeing incentive rates or more hedging on the part of the
CA LDC's so that all their needs are not being served by the spot market.  In
the current market, hedges (longer term contracting and financial) are being
done primarily by the producers and marketers, which results in a thin and
probably off-kilter market (the LDCs buying for the customers are not
participating).  I know we have to square this with the EES positions, but I
am not up to speed on what is going on in CA on this issue.

Phillip also made that point that while the LDCs are focusing on their core
load, no one is doing system planning on the macro basis, taking into account
the ability of the physical systems to meet the needs of all customers, core
and non-core and making sure the system will be adequate.

Finally, he is very interested in seeing the CA LDC rates unbundled.

Any updates we can provide to Phillip (and the gas girls) would be
appreciated, as well as what our plans are to address these issues.

From our side, El Paso is having a conference in July and we will be taking
up a number of allocation and transportation issues at that time.

Thanks.


fyi
----- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 02/16/2001 01:39 PM -----

	Stacy Carey <SCAREY@ISDA.ORG>
	02/16/2001 12:05 PM

		 To: US REGULATORY COMMITTEE <USREGCOMM@isda.org>
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: Revised S.220 markup and summary

I am forwarding the amendment revisions discussed on this morning's call.

Attached are revised versions of the summary of proposed changes to
S.220/H.333 and the markup of the bill.  The only changes are to the new
provisions (in riders 344A and 352A of the markup) dealing with rulemaking
authority for the SEC and CFTC to address the treatment of accounts in
which both securities and futures are carried.  For your convenience, we
have included both clean and blacklined versions of the summary.  --
Geoffrey B. Goldman

(See attached file: s220markup2-16.pdf)(See attached file:
summary2-16compare.doc)(See attached file: summary2-16.doc)

This message is being sent from a law firm and may contain information
which is confidential or privileged.  If you are not the intended
recipient, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete
this message and any attachments without retaining a copy.

 - s220markup2-16.pdf
 - summary2-16compare.doc
 - summary2-16.doc


Forgot to copy you on the original dist.

----- Forwarded by Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT on 07/26/2000 05:39 PM -----

	Gerald Nemec
	07/26/2000 05:38 PM

		 To: Michael J Legler/HOU/ECT
		 cc: Chris Hilgert/HOU/ECT@ect
		 Subject: Term Sheet

Attached is my draft revised term sheet for the producer purchase
agreements.  Let me know if you have any comments.


Check out this email.  Now don't get me in trouble with Janet. I advised her
"soto voce" in a private email that he was not an attorney.  But note that
in her note she refers to him as an attorney, and he is offering his
opinions about EPMI's options in terms of compliance with Calfornia
laws--and from what Janet said this is part of a nationwide compliance
program LeBoeuf is running for Enron.  The email also references John
Klauberg, who is the main LeBoeuf attorney in NYC that Enron uses on
contract stuff, and all the ENA and EES guys like his work, so he must be
involved in this and you shouldn't mess with that.  I am most concerned that
Enron attorneys not be misled into thinking Boothe is an attorney.

-----Original Message-----
From: Janet.H.Moore@enron.com [mailto:Janet.H.Moore@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 8:55 AM
To: mday@gmssr.com
Cc: Christian.Yoder@enron.com
Subject: Registered versus Non-Registered ESPs in California

Mike:  Per my voicemail, I am forwarding to you an email from an attorney
at LeBoeuf.  As mentioned, LeBoeuf has been helping us develop an overall
compliance plan for meeting the varied retail regulatory requirements in
the states where EPMI sells to industrials.  They came up with the
suggestion, as discussed further below, of having EPMI deregister as an ESP
in California, and instead become a non-registered ESP.  I understand that
EPMI could still sell to large industrials under this classification.
First, can you remember the historical reason of why EPMI registered as an
ESP to begin with, but with the qualification that it only intended to
serve large industrials?  There may have been an important strategic
decision to do so.  Second, is there any reason why EPMI should not
deregister as an ESP and become a non-registered ESP?
I look forward to hearing from you.  Please feel free to call me at
713-345-7400.
Janet
----- Forwarded by Janet H Moore/HOU/ECT on 05/29/2001 10:28 AM -----

"JAMES

BOOTHE"              To:     janet.h.moore@enron.com

<JBOOTHE@LLGM        cc:     marianne.castano@enron.com,
"CHRISTOPHER HILEN"
.COM>                <CHILEN@LLGM.COM>, "JOHN KLAUBERG"
<JKLAUBER@LLGM.COM>, "JOHN MAAS"
<JMAAS@LLGM.COM>, "SANDY COFER"
<SCOFER@LLGM.COM>
05/23/2001           Subject:     Registered versus
Non-Registered ESPs in California
02:19 PM

Janet,

As you know, EPMI is currently classified with the California Public
Utilities Commission ("CPUC") as a "Registered ESP" (ESP # 1086).  EPMI may
want to consider de-registering with the CPUC and, instead, benefit from
classification as a "Non-Registered ESP".  I have confirmed that an ESP
must only register with the CPUC prior to serving residential and small
commercial customers.  The CPUC defines a "small commercial customer" as a
customer that has a maximum peak demand of less than 20 kW per meter for at
least 9 billing periods during the most recent 12 month period (See
C.P.U.C. o 331(h) and PG&E Tariff, Rule 22).  As EPMI has indicated in its
license application that it only intends to serve large commercial
customers and, per our discussions, does not have immediate plans to serve
small commercial customers, EPMI may elect to de-register and become a
Non-Registered ESP.
The primary advantage of de-registering is that EPMI, as a
Non-Registered ESP, would no longer have continued reporting and compliance
requirements with the CPUC, including the annual submission of a standard
service plan filing, application update and license renewal.  Additionally,
as a Non-Registered ESP, EPMI would no longer have the ongoing obligation
to notify the CPUC within 5 days of changes in address or phone numbers and
to notify the CPUC of all other "material changes", including changes to
officers and directors, within 60 days.  I have confirmed with a contact at
the energy division of the CPUC, on an anonymous basis, that a Registered
ESP can de-register with the CPUC by sending a letter to the address below
requesting cancellation of ESP registration status.
California Public Utilities Commission
Energy Division - Electric Service Provider Registration
Fourth Floor
505 Van Ness Avenue
San Francisco, CA 94102
Our source at the CPUC also confirmed that the CPUC exercises no regulatory
jurisdiction over a Non-Registered ESP.  Non-Registered ESPs, however, can
file a complaint at the CPUC against a jurisdictional utility over issues
dealing with the utility's compliance with its tariffs with respect to
ESPs.

Please note that while Non-Registered ESPs do not have ongoing
reporting and compliance requirements with the CPUC, both Registered ESPs
and Non-Registered ESPs must submit various environmental compliance
filings with the California Energy Commission and, if participating in the
Green-e Program, make additional filings with the Center for Resource
Solutions.  For additional information on these reporting and compliance
requirements for Registered ESPs and Non-Registered ESPs in California,
please refer to the LLGM website at
http://web-2.interliant.com/llgm/ENRON/llgm.nsf.

If you have any questions about reporting requirements in California,
the de-registering process or would like our assistance with this process,
please contact me at 415.951.1137 or Sandy Cofer at 713.287.2002.

Regards,

Jim

James A. Boothe
One Embarcadero Center, Suite 400
San Francisco, California 94111
(415) 951-1137
jboothe@llgm.com

============================================================================
==

This e-mail, including attachments, contains information that is
confidential and may be protected by the attorney/client or other
privileges.  This e-mail, including attachments, constitutes non-public
information intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s).
If you are not an intended recipient, please delete this e-mail, including
attachments, and notify me.  The unauthorized use, dissemination,
distribution or reproduction of this e-mail, including attachments, is
prohibited and may be unlawful.

============================================================================
==


Daren - Is there a reason there is a nom of 20.000/day at meter 385?  This is
a non-allocatable meter.

AL


My asst., Kaye Ellis, will be calling each of you this morning to see if you
can attend a short meeting today to discuss a due diligence effort with
regard to Pacific Gas  and Electric Company and its various subsidiaries.  We
have an overall exposure report from Credit which shows that Enron is exposed
to PG&E in virtually all of the commodities that we transact.

In the meeting today - Travis and I will help you identify the PG&E
entity/entities which may have transactions with Enron concerning your
particular commodity. We will ask you to pull the relevant master agreement
and provide the information set forth below.

Thank you in advance for your help,

Shari

----- Forwarded by Shari Stack/HOU/ECT on 01/09/2001 09:57 AM -----

	Travis McCullough
	01/09/2001 09:12 AM

		 To: Shari Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrew Edison/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: PGE due diligence effort

Here is a list of the information that we will need to collect from each
master agreement:

Governing law;
summary of setoff provisions (in particular, does the contract give us the
right to setoff (i) only those transactions under the specific master, (ii)
transactions under other agreements between the same counterparties; or (iii)
transactions under other agreements between affiliates of the counterparties;
(v) all transactions or only those transactions that we elect to offset;
summary of termination provisions (automatic upon bankruptcy or insolvency of
a party? any notice requirements?)
summary of liquidated damages provisions (how computed?  provision for
two-way LD's (such that even the breaching party gets a payment if they are
in the money?)

We also need to discuss how we can get comfortable that all transactions were
properly booked under the correct master agreement, and that there are no
significant "glitches" in our transaction documentation.

Travis McCullough
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street EB 3817
Houston Texas 77002
Phone:  (713) 853-1575
Fax: (713) 646-3490


Stacy, please look into this ASAP and report back to me.   Mark
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT on 09/24/99 04:17
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Philippe Bibi                           09/23/99 08:18 AM

Sent by: Philippe A Bibi
To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: wall street jounal article - enron software inc.

Can someone look at this Enron Software Co?

IS there a name infringment issue?

Thanks

P.

---------------------- Forwarded by Philippe A Bibi/HOU/ECT on 09/23/99 08:17
AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Mark Pickering                           09/23/99 04:26 AM

To: Philippe A Bibi/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: wall street jounal article - enron software inc.

????
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Pickering/LON/ECT on 23/09/99 10:27
---------------------------

Eric Virro
21/09/99 20:55
To: Richard J Black/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark Pickering/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: wall street jounal article - enron software inc.

Heard of this?

Eric

September 21, 1999
Work Week
COMPANIES CRACK DOWN on the increasing sexual harassment by e-mail.

Using computer-monitoring devices provided by Enron Software Inc.,
Burlington, Mass., 20th Century Fox scans employees' e-mail to stop the flow
of sexually offensive messages, says Jeff Uslan, manager of information
protection. After an e-mail harassment incident, Image First, a New Castle,
Del., uniforms maker, notified workers that e-mail will be reviewed for any
violation of its antiharassment policy.

Fully 31% of more than 1,000 human-resources officials surveyed by
Philadelphia labor-relations lawyer Stephen Cabot and the American Management
Association reported that employees have sometimes gotten sexually harassing
e-mails; 85% of the employers have policies to avert problems. Employers
including First Union Corp., Charlotte, N.C., have fired people recently for
sending harassing e-mail.

Unlike in-person conduct, e-mail harassment is easy to prove since the
electronic trail documents allegations, says Kathleen Neville, a
sexual-harassment consultant.

[...]

--Albert R. Karr

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
URL for this Article:
http://interactive.wsj.com/archive/retrieve.cgi?id=SB937873133994886394.djm

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

Copyright , 1999 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Printing, distribution, and use of this material is governed by your
Subscription Agreement and copyright laws.

For information about subscribing, go to http://wsj.com


Update: Per Bernadette Hawkins, a dial in number is being set up for this
meeting and will be sent via e:mail to everyone.

Per Jim Steffes, the time has changed for the above referenced meeting from
10:00 a.m. (DC time) to 2:00 p.m. (DC time).  Please mark your calendars and
pass this information on to anyone not listed above who also needs to be
notified.

Thank you so much!


I am not going to fly on Thurs, but Jessica wants to go anyway.  I think I am going to stay.  SHe seems ok with it

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Livia_Zufferli@Monitor.com@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 9:35 AM
To:	Zufferli, John
Subject:

Hi John,

How are you doing? Are you nervous to fly on Thursday?  Everything will be
okay -- don't worry.  I'm going to have to start flying to Montreal again,
at least one day a week, because i'm on the new case.

How's work going?

Livia


Jason,

Please, give me a call at 713 853 3848 and we can meet for coffee.

Vince

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Jennaro, Jason
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 1:25 PM
To:	Kaminski, Vince J
Subject:	Advice

Vince,

I have never had a chance to formally meet you but many people have said that you would be a wonderful person to talk to seek advice from.  I have a couple of directions that I am considering for careers right now (in risk management) and it would mean a lot to me to be able to sit down with you for a little bit to get your perspective.  Is there anyway I could buy you coffee or lunch sometime over the week or so?

Thanks,
Jason Jennaro


----- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 06/08/2000 01:44 PM -----

	Adriane Moratto@ENRON
	06/07/2000 05:36 PM

		 To: jgilchrist@viant.com, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Michael Danielson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Remaining Web Content

sorry about the other emails, please disregard them.  This should be the last
of it!!

Adriane

Let me know if I need to resend anything!!


Matt,

Our preference is to sign this before June 19.  I recall that Herman is out.
Do you know when he will be back?

I will make sure that you and Herman get a copy of the next draft.  It won't
be this week.

Kay


John, let's discuss when you get back Wednesay.  Thanks. Lynn

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Buchanan, John
Sent:	Tuesday, September 04, 2001 10:42 AM
To:	Blair, Lynn
Subject:	FW: Price on lamination/mouse pads

Lynn,
It looks like the mouse pads are kind of expensive, what do you think?

John Buchanan

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Garcia, Ava
Sent:	Tuesday, September 04, 2001 10:27 AM
To:	Buchanan, John
Subject:	Price on lamination/mouse pads

John, per your request price for front and back lamination is .70 cents for color copy and $20/ 1 hr. for lamination which is 50 copies per hour.
I was not able to get an exact price on mouse pad however I was given an estimate of $15 to $20 depending on amount ordered.  I have left a message for Karen in graphics and am waiting for reply.

Thanks,
Ava


877-670-4111   passcode 589314


Ralph; I wanted to exchange crucial phone numbers and contacts with you.  If you'll reciprocate with key contacts for Holnam I would appreciate it.

If for some reason I am unavailable and you wish to either purchase or sell MW volumes, please feel free to contact Diana Scholtes on (503) 464-3807.

Our Pre-Schedule (one day or longer scheduling requirements) phone number is 1-877-464-7779.  The two ladies most involved with scheduling loads in the Montana region are Stacy Runswick (503) 464-3747 and Cara Semperger (503) 464-3814.

Our 24-Hour Real-Time (less than one day and up to the next hour) phone number is 1-800-684-1336

You have my office phone number (503) 464-2270 and my cellular phone number is (503) 701-0295.

I do not anticipate you needing anyone's number but my own, nor do I anticipate having to contact anyone but you, but I did want to exchange this information just in case.

Once again we appreciate the opportunity to serve your Montana loads, and look forward to working together in the future.

John


David,

I guess I think that it is not worth the fight these days.  I suppose would approve this training, but I think we need to have an understanding w/ Ogletree about travel time, travel expenses, billing rates, etc.  They need to understand who holds the purse strings, and I do not think it would be appropriate for them to bill their full hourly rate for time spent on travel given that we could find someone local to do the same training -- or could send me or Lizzette to do it for the cost of travel only.    For your information, David, there is nothing magic about the training they are doing.  It is standard training that I used to deliver frequently when I was in private practice.  Ogletree does not have a monopoly on it.

I'll try to call you early this week, now that the other work I have been focusing on may slow down a bit.

Michelle

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	David.Lund@nepco.com@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, November 06, 2001 7:35 PM
To:	Cash, Michelle
Subject:	FW: Harassment Training

Michelle, Here's the training the NEPCO HR group has on their schedule.  I
think the outcome of your meeting with Indivero and Schwartzenburg is that
Mike would forward through me all requests involving the retention of
outside counsel including the expected training needs from outside counsel.
Let me know if you have any comments or suggestions.  Thanks.

David H. Lund, Jr.
Assistant General Counsel
National Energy Production Corporation
11831 North Creek Parkway N.
Bothell, WA 98011
425-415-3138
Fax: 425-415-3032
David.Lund@nepco.com or davidlu@nepco.com

-----Original Message-----
From:	B-Gloria Rivas
Sent:	Tuesday, November 06, 2001 1:26 PM
To:	B-David Lund
Cc:	B-Mike Indivero
Subject:	Harassment Training

David,  we have schedule Ogletree, Deakins and Nash to conduct Harassment
and Union Avoidance training at our El Dorado, AK job site on December 4th
and 5th.  We will be scheduling the training at our Lakeworth job site after
the first of the year. If you have any questions, please contact me at
x3136.

Glo


As Final Exams Begin, Power Is a Big Question
The New York Times, 05/13/01

British Telecom
The Times of London, 05/12/01

Houston needs to think small about future technology
Houston Chronicle, 05/13/01

Panel plots new course for area's future / Education, economics, quality of
life top group's list of needed improvements
Houston Chronicle, 05/13/01

MSEB not to pick up 15 pc in DPC after phase II completion
Press Trust of India Limited, 05/13/01

Enron plans to pull out of Gulf gas project: MEED
Agence France-Presse, 05/13/01

SMALL BUSINESS / Pleasure cruisin' / Yacht fleet owner offers customers what
amounts to limo service on the lake
Houston Chronicle, 05/13/01

More power to reform agenda
The Economic Times, 05/13/01

India Power Min: New Power Deal With Enron Unit Possible
Dow Jones International News, 05/12/01

India: Talks begin on Dabhol issue
Business Line (The Hindu), 05/12/01

India to allow 3rd party sale if DPC, MSEB jointly approach
Press Trust of India Limited, 05/12/01

DEFAZIO CALLS FOR STATE TO BUY PGE TO PROTECT RATES
Portland Oregonian, 05/12/01

Congressman suggests state buy PGE
Associated Press Newswires, 05/11/01

National Desk; Section 1
As Final Exams Begin, Power Is a Big Question
By JODI WILGOREN

05/13/2001
The New York Times
Page 16, Column 4
c. 2001 New York Times Company

For final exams, prepared students pack extra pens, calculators, bottled
water, granola bars. And, at the University of California's Berkeley campus
this year, a flashlight.
As state officials and utilities struggle to maintain the power supply during
California's continuing energy shortage, administrators and professors at the
31,000-student campus are planning for the possibility that rolling blackouts
may disrupt exams, which began on Friday and run through next Saturday.
''People here are used to interruptions,'' Sara Abbas, 21, a senior
communications major, said with a shrug as she studied in a cafe near campus.
''People walking in, people running around buck naked and whatnot. People
have cut the power lines. They just reschedule.''
In an e-mail message sent Wednesday, the executive vice chancellor, Paul R.
Gray, advised instructors to use ''individual discretion to decide the
disposition of their examinations once the exam has started.'' Among the
options: delay the test until the lights return; postpone it until a
Saturday; grade the incomplete test; or cancel the exam altogether.
Professors are also encouraged to check a Web site to see if their exam rooms
have windows. ''In some classrooms,'' Mr. Gray noted, ''students may have
sufficient natural light.''
The rolling blackouts could hit most of the campuses of the University of
California and California State University. The two systems are embroiled in
a legal dispute with Enron Energy Services, a Houston-based company that, in
February, cut short a four-year contract to provide electricity directly to
the universities. For now, the two systems -- among the largest energy
consumers in the state -- are being supplied by Pacific Gas and Electric and
Southern California Edison.
Though several medical centers and the Davis, Los Angeles and Riverside
campuses of the University of California system are exempt from the
blackouts, the rest of the campuses have been put on alert.
At Berkeley, the warning from Mr. Gray only heightened pre-exam stress
levels.
''Stopping in the middle of a final would be detrimental to my grade because
I save the hardest questions until the end,'' said Heidi West, 20, a
sophomore majoring in political science.
Aaron Chung, a senior studying cognitive science, said it would be unfair to
grade half-finished exams because he often circled answers instinctively,
planning to return later with more care. ''The only thing I don't have a
problem with is if the professors give everyone A's,'' Mr. Chung, 23, said.
''You have to be under a lot of duress for that to happen.''
Gary L. Firestone, a biology professor, said he would move his 500-member
class out into the sunshine and tell students to spread their blue books on
the grass. But Jeff Good, a graduate student who teaches Introduction to
Syntax and Semantics, said he would probably cancel the exam because the
final counts for only 20 percent of the grade.
That is what Michelle Chen, a junior linguistics major in Mr. Good's class,
is hoping for.
''I would love a blackout,'' Ms. Chen said. ''I'm going to turn on my
air-conditioner. My toaster, too.''

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Business
British Telecom
Patience Wheatcroft

05/12/2001
The Times of London
News International
Final 4
55
(Copyright Times Newspapers Ltd, 2001)

BRITISH TELECOM has inflicted enough damage on itself in the past year. But
others are still lining up to put the boot in. Hours after the company
announced a Pounds 5.9 billion rights issue and the separation of cash-hungry
BT Wireless, Moody's Investors Service lowered BT's credit rating. This
thumbs-down will cost BT an extra Pounds 35 million a year on existing loans
as well as making future working capital more expensive.
The timing is odd. One of the two other main agencies presented with the same
BT proposals maintained its rating and the other edged it down so little that
change-of-rating clauses were not triggered. In the meantime, the market
prices of BT debt have been rising. The Enron Cost of Credit, which measures
the overall risk premium on BT borrowing, has halved since mid February. Such
costly inconsistencies must focus more critical attention on the agencies,
whose power has grown out of proportion to their accountability.
Moody's verdict is, however, peanuts compared with the cost to BT of the
whims of Stephen Byers and the UK competition authorities. Moody's will no
doubt be aghast to learn that Yell could be worth Pounds 1 billion less as a
result.
In 1996 the Monopolies and Mergers Commission found that BT's Yellow Pages
had an 85 per cent monopoly of its market and made it sign undertakings to
cut prices by 2 per cent a year in real terms. The Office of Fair Trading has
reviewed this report; predictably, it has found that the enforced price cuts
have kept competition down and kept Yell's market share up.
The reasoning behind OFT advice that annual real price cuts should be doubled
is closed to scrutiny until Mr Byers has a new BT undertaking. But it appears
to argue that the market is still a monopoly, so Yell must be charging too
much, so prices should fall further.
The result, according to those formerly eager to buy Yell, is that a growth
business has been turned into a stagnant one, losing all momentum. This
sounds typical of the dead hand of UK regulation. It must strengthen the
resolve of BT's new leaders to remodel what the authorities so hate to the
greater advantage of shareholders.

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

OUTLOOK
Outlook
Houston needs to think small about future technology
WILLIAM DYLAN POWELL

05/13/2001
Houston Chronicle
2 STAR
4
(Copyright 2001)

OK, it's test time - sort of like a breakfast-time Rorschach test for Outlook
readers. Here we go: What's the first thing that comes to mind when someone
mentions Houston?
Time's up. Your answers may have been energy, medicine or seemingly random
acts of highway closure. But how about something very, very small? While
Houston may not exactly be synonymous with all things tiny, we may want to
start giving more mind share to the world of the miniature. As technology
advances, Houston may owe a great deal to the study of small substances.
Nanotechnology is the study of creating functional structures on a molecular
scale (the prefix "nano" means one billionth, or 10 to the ninth power
numerically). Its theories and practices give scientists the means to
construct useful entities using the smallest known particle of unaltered
matter.
Before your eyes glaze over in a terminology-induced science class flashback,
you should hear some of the possibilities that this technology could afford
residents of the Bayou City and their respective commercial enterprises. The
possibilities give the works of science fiction author Ray Bradbury a run for
their money, and include producing computers the size of viruses or factories
that could fit neatly on your desk. Cancer-destroying robots could roam a
patient's innards like mounted police at a spring break celebration.
Eventually, all diseases and mutations could be eliminated. And all
manufacturing processes would become waste-free, both in terms of the
environment and from a business process standpoint.
Sound like science fiction? Maybe, but truth is rapidly catching up with
fiction. A team of university researchers recently figured out how to make a
functional switch out of a single organic molecule. Discoveries such as these
have spawned several branch fields of study including nanobiotics, NEMS
(nanoelectromechanical systems) and nanomedicine.
This technology would surely change the world. But it would especially affect
Houston. Applications for nanotechnology are a great fit for Houston's
economic landscape. The chemical industry already has begun conducting
research in small-sizing certain chemical compounds. And the energy industry,
still our darling, has great interest in the power management possibilities
of nanotech. This could be Houston's next great vehicle for economic
development.
Nay-sayers have expressed caution regarding progress in this field on two
separate fronts. First on how distant potential commercial offerings remain;
and secondly on the potential dangers of combining genetic engineering,
nanotechnology and robotics (for fear of creating self-assembling intelligent
machines as often portrayed in science-fiction movies). But too much
technological progress is happening at once for the possibilities not to whet
the appetites of the entire scientific and business communities.
Already, developmental overtures have been heard from Houston's little sister
to the north. The Dallas-Fort Worth region and its growing base of
semiconductor, light assembly and defense industries are keeping a close eye
on developments in small science. In March, a private-sector company donated
$2.5 million to the University of Texas at Dallas for nanotech research. And
a handful of Dallas-area groups have been quietly conducting research of
their own. This money augments the federal government's nearly half-billion
dollar allotment of 2001 research funding for nanotechnology. Houston has its
own projects, but they receive far less publicity.
Houston's public nanoscience efforts have been centered mostly on Rice
University's grand Turks of academia. Pushing the envelope of academic
excellence as usual, Rice's heavyweight research barons continue to generate
and distribute knowledge on the many potential applications of this exciting
technology. But as successful as they are, they receive far less publicity
and support than other less commercially significant disciplines.
On May 29, leaders from the energy, medical and technology sectors will
converge at the Houston Technology Forum to discuss various technology trends
that will affect Houston's future. Will the keynote speakers (chief
executives from Compaq, the Texas Medical Center and Enron) address the issue
of what Houston is doing to prepare for advances in nanotechnology and its
potential economic impact on the region?
I certainly hope so. Energy, medicine and technology are the terra firma of
Houston's economy. Each of these industry sectors could reap profound
benefits by bringing nanotechnology's concepts to light.
Sure, the fruits of this nascent science are still a long way off. But it's
going to become remarkably important sooner than we think. So while
Houstonians are well known for our love of largeness, it's time to think
small. Let's take a careful evaluation of what this technology could mean to
our city and its economic development.

Drawing

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

A
Panel plots new course for area's future / Education, economics, quality of
life top group's list of needed improvements
MIKE SNYDER
Staff

05/13/2001
Houston Chronicle
4 STAR
33
(Copyright 2001)

A group of prominent business executives, worried that Houston's reputation
as an unpleasant place to live imperils its future, is developing a plan to
transform the city's educational system, urban design and economic base.
The work of the Center for Houston's Future, a nonprofit group affiliated
with the Greater Houston Partnership, reflects growing concern that Houston
must reposition itself as a vibrant, desirable destination if it is to
compete in an economic climate that empowers skilled workers to live wherever
they choose.
Creating such a "livable city," leaders of the effort say, would in turn
enrich the lives of every Houstonian.
"The interests of the business community are fully aligned with the interests
of the community at large," said Eugene H. Vaughan, a money management
executive and board chairman of the Center for Houston's Future.
A report prepared for the organization by a business-based task force
recommends that local leaders challenge long-held assumptions that have
discouraged meaningful land-use planning. It sketches a vision of Houston 20
years from now in which technology and other tools have revolutionized public
education, "livable city centers" have changed the physical landscape and
current civic leaders have groomed a new, more diverse generation of
successors.
The report argues that the business community's traditional leadership role
in Houston's civic affairs should continue. But it suggests the models of
business influence that prevailed in "the old days" should be re-examined.
"Those were the days when oil was king, and Houston was the energy capital of
the world - the days when a handful of `big' leaders, including CEOs of major
corporations, could meet in a room together and decide on the future of
Houston," the report states.
"But times have changed, and there is far less tolerance in Houston's highly
diverse, egalitarian society for a hidden oligarchy to run things, no matter
how benevolent those leaders might be."
The center's board includes top executives of some of Houston's most
successful and influential companies, including Enron Chairman Ken Lay; Ned
Holmes, chairman and CEO of Parkway Investments/Texas Inc.; James Royer,
president and CEO of Turner, Collie & Braden Inc.; William White, president
and CEO of WEDGE Group Inc.; and Jim Kollaer, president and CEO of the
Greater Houston Partnership.
Vaughan said the stature of the board members is an indication that the group
is not likely to generate plans that will simply sit on a shelf.
"They've got so many demands on their time that they're not going to fool
around with something that is ill-conceived," he said.
Rice University sociology professor Stephen Klineberg, one of the experts who
advised the task force that generated the report, agreed that the center's
work could be very influential.
"This is the first time there's been a systematic, coordinated effort on the
part of the business community" to improve Houston's quality of life,
Klineberg said.
The Center for Houston's Future was created in the early 1990s primarily as a
source of research information for the partnership, Houston's premier
business organization. But its role changed about two years ago, Vaughan
said, when Holmes became chairman of the partnership and encouraged the
center to take an aggressive approach to planning for the region's future.
Last summer, the center organized three workshops attended by 36 people
representing a cross section of the business community. These 10-day,
seven-night events, led by professional facilitators and featuring various
guest speakers, produced a report outlining four possible future Houston
scenarios.
James D. Calaway, a member of the center's board, said the details outlined
in the four scenarios are intended to be "illustrative" and are not
necessarily the actions the organization ultimately will recommend. However,
they provide insight into the direction of the group's thinking, he said.
In the first scenario, based on the assumption that local planning and
decision-making proceed much as they have in the past, the workshop
participants speculate that tension between the city and suburbs increases to
the point that the Legislature strips Houston of its annexation power.
Development is greatly restricted because of failure to meet clean-air
standards, property values plummet and the City Council must pass a large tax
rate increase.
Houston becomes a stronghold of low-wage, service-sector employment, and the
gap between rich and poor widens: "For many who live there, it's simply a
large urban sprawl, adrift in the global economy, or it's a three-year
hardship post on the way to something more desirable."
Scenario two suggests that Houston's leaders transform the educational system
by developing a "Teacher Network" that delivers Internet-based educational
resources into every classroom and teacher's home in the region. This in turn
leads to a communitywide electronic educational network, with every home in
the Houston area connected to the Internet by 2007.
These efforts, combined with universal, full-day preschool care, lead to
state-of-the-art local schools by 2010, with almost universal high school
graduation rates and 75 percent of these graduates going on to college or
technical training programs.
The report does not estimate the cost of these measures or identify how they
would be funded. Potential sources, Calaway said, include local, state and
federal tax money, private grants and reallocation of funds now being spent
on more traditional educational programs.
In scenario three, local leaders take bold steps to overcome Houston's
reputation for sprawl, dirty air and lack of green space - perceptions that
hamper efforts to attract the talent needed to keep the region economically
competitive.
These leaders develop a vision of Houston based on the creation of "livable
city centers" - major activity centers targeted for redesign and
redevelopment - and the connection of these centers through "personal and
public transport in corridors that delight the eye."
Within the centers, streets are reconstructed to better accommodate
pedestrians. Financial incentives prompt developers to provide a wide range
of housing styles, including substantial affordable housing. The Main Street
light rail line is built, succeeds spectacularly and is followed by more rail
lines extending in various directions.
To accomplish these goals, the report states, local leaders must overcome
their "ingrained suspicion of planning," and the City Council must adopt
"new, more prescriptive development standards" within the livable city
centers. Early successes lead to a public referendum authorizing the
expenditure of $8 billion over 20 years to create the "livable city."
Scenario four focuses on making Houston a "crossroads of the world economy."
The city's business leadership becomes broader and more diverse, and it turns
its energy toward diversifying the economy.
The energy industry, adapting to the new economic climate, transforms its
business model and creates new, high-tech enterprises. Space, nanotechnology
and biotechnology research help launch hundreds of companies that quickly
become significant global players.
The workshop participants concluded that Houston must accomplish key elements
of scenarios two, three and four if it is to become a "true world-class city
in which to live and conduct business."
Calaway and Vaughan said the next steps will include designating committees
to develop specific recommendations in each of the broad areas studied, such
as education and quality of life. Working groups then will be established to
begin translating these ideas into policy, they said.
Although the center is focused on the long term, they said, it must produce
results as soon as possible.
"If we do not get serious about this, 20 years from now we're going to be a
low-wage environment, putting people in very, very dead- end jobs," Calaway
said during a recent presentation on the group's work to members of the
nonprofit Gulf Coast Institute.
"We've got to get the quality of life right, but we've also got to make sure
that we educate these kids for our future."

Mugs: 1. Ken Lay (p. 45); 2. Ned Holmes (p. 45); 3. James Royer (p. 45); 4.
Jim Kollaer (p. 45)

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

MSEB not to pick up 15 pc in DPC after phase II completion

05/13/2001
Press Trust of India Limited
(c) 2001 PTI Ltd.

Mumbai, May 13 (PTI) Maharashtra State Electricity Board (MSEB) has decided
not to pick up the remaining 15 per cent equity in Enron-promoted Dabhol
Power Company (DPC), which it was earlier supposed to, after the complete
construction of the entire USD three billion power project in Dabhol.
"It is true that we had promised to take the 15 per cent, translating into
infusion of around USD 65 million and given the serious financial stress the
board is facing, it is not going to be possible for us to participate in the
phase II of the project", a senior MSEB official told PTI here Sunday.
Currently, Enron International owns 65 per cent, MSEB -15 per cent, General
Electric and Bechtel 10 per cent each.
However, MSEB is yet to send an official intimation to DPC in this regard,
the official said adding the board would inform the company soon after the
completion of the project.
DPC's USD 1.87 billion phase II would be fired on June seven, 2001, thus
marking completion of the 2,184 MW project.
DPC, which received a Foreign Investment and Promotion Board clearance in
last December for its 10.83 billion foreign Direct Investment, has not been
able to scout an alternative fifth partner for MSEB's equity.
The company had decided to off load the 15 per cent of its current holding of
65 per cent to a new entity, as according to the company's global
debt-consolidation it needed to maintain its stake at 50 per cent in DPC
after its completion.
In order to avoid any delay, Enron had agreed to meet up with the equity
shortfall as per the former's agreement with its lenders.
(THROUGH ASIA PULSE) 13-05 2001

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Enron plans to pull out of Gulf gas project: MEED

05/13/2001
Agence France-Presse
(Copyright 2001)

DUBAI, May 13 (AFP) - Enron Corp. of the United States plans to pull out of a
project to deliver Qatari gas to the United Arab Emirates (UAE), Middle East
Economic Digest (MEED) reported on Sunday.
Enron is a partner in the Dolphin Energy project along with the
Franco-Belgian company TotalFinaElf and the Abu Dhabi government- owned UAE
Offsets Group (UOG). Its role is to build a pipeline under the Gulf between
Qatar and Abu Dhabi.
"The profit margin for Enron would be low. At present, the Dolphin project is
being developed primarily as an upstream venture," an industry source told
MEED.
Another industry publication, Middle East Economic Survey (MEES), reported
last week that the two other partners regarded Enron's estimated cost for
constructing and laying the 350-kilometre (220- mile) undersea pipeline as
too high.
"There is talk of new partners," a source with TotalFinaElf, whose role is to
develop a block in Qatar's giant North Field, told MEED. "But whatever
happens, we are staying."
On March 14, Qatar and the UAE inked a 25-year term sheet agreement on the
project, setting the volume at two billion cubic feet (20 million cubic
metres) of natural gas per day.
Differences over pricing and volumes had put back the signing of the
agreement for two years after a first statement of principle for Dolphin was
inked by Qatar and UOG in March 1999.
According to MEES, Qatar Petroleum and UOG have finally agreed on a gas price
formula of 1.3 dollars per million BTU (British thermal units) following
"high-level political intervention from Qatar and Abu Dhabi".
TotalFinaElf and Enron are strategic partners in the multi- billion-dollar
project, each holding a 24.5 percent share in Dolphin Energy Limited (DEL),
with UOG retaining a controlling 51 percent stake.
From Abu Dhabi, the gas is to be distributed inside the emirate and on to
Dubai and Oman. An extension to Pakistan through an undersea pipeline is also
planned, as part of a regional gas network.
hc/rp

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

BUSINESS
SMALL BUSINESS / Pleasure cruisin' / Yacht fleet owner offers customers what
amounts to limo service on the lake
CAROL RUST
Special to the Chronicle

05/13/2001
Houston Chronicle
2 STAR
1
(Copyright 2001)

KEMAH - Tom Lober trundled home from second grade with a three- tiered wooden
box he'd made at school.
"This is my houseboat," he told his mother 35 years ago. "When I grow up, I'm
going to live on a boat."
His practical-minded mother put the "boat" to work as a patio plant stand
until it finally rotted from a decade of exposure.
On a recent evening, Lober stood on the bow of one of his four charter
yachts, enjoying the sunset-tinted water and a mild breeze as the 100-foot
luxury boat moved quietly from Clear Lake into Galveston Bay.
"This is what I love," Lober said, scanning a horizon dotted with distant
boats. "The others are here to party, but this is it for me."
The founder and owner of Star Fleet Entertainment Yachts spoke calmly against
the din of a mini-Mardi Gras heating up on middeck, where bead-clad
executives were letting their hair down at their annual appreciation party
for a major customer. A Mae West look- alike hired for the event meandered
among them, handing out cigars and sultry comments in her mermaid-cut white
dress studded with faux pearls and a white feather boa twirled about her
neck.
In the eight and one-half years since the 42-year-old Lober started Star
Fleet, he's seen everything from fire-eaters to hula dancers as entertainment
on the hundreds of custom cruises his staff of 70 puts together each year.
Last year, the company booked 400 cruises, which translated into $2.3 million
in gross sales, in events ranging from Gulf Coast versions of company picnics
to a bat mitzvah with a Gilligan's Island theme. One guy recently plunked
down $2,000 to charter an entire boat for a date.
One of Lober's seven captains is, handily, a licensed minister for weddings.
Star Fleet staff recently added squirt guns, Hula Hoops and limbo sticks as
regular on-board equipment.
"It's a bizarre business," Lober said. "Nothing seems unusual anymore."
Nearly all Star Fleet's cruises include dinner. His kitchen staff does the
prep work for hors d'oeuvres and main courses on land near the marina,
transferring them to a generous galley on board before customers arrive. The
galley crew does the final cooking.
Star Fleet Entertainment Yachts is one of about a dozen businesses of its
size in the country that provides strictly private charter yacht cruises, but
Lober has hundreds of competitors locally.
"I'm competing with caterers, hotels, restaurants - anyone in the eating,
drinking and party business," he said. "People say there are two things
you're never supposed to own: a boat and a restaurant. I put a restaurant on
a boat."
Last month, he launched what he believes is the first-ever water limousine, a
30-foot yacht complete with wet bar, sound system, leather couches, TV and
VCR that takes small groups to waterfront restaurants and bars, just like a
limo does on land.
Sometimes, his clients hop off and dine at one of the restaurants on the
Kemah Boardwalk while the limo is anchored beside it. In other cases, waiters
deliver the food to the boat, equipped with removable dining tables that can
seat 14, and the customers dine while cruising Clear Lake.
Lober was a natural shoo-in for a career on the water. His father owned a
supply boat business in Houston and a fleet of shrimp boats based in
Trinidad. He eventually became president of his dad's supply boat business
after getting a master's degree in maritime management from Texas A&M
Maritime Academy in Galveston in 1981.
But he still had that idea from second grade that grew from living on a boat
to providing exclusive entertainment on the water.
In 1986, he joined the Passenger Vessel Association, a national group of
vessel owners that provides public or private cruises for gaming, ecotourism
or other entertainment. He attended seminars, talked to boat owners,
researched trends in the industry and tried to figure out what it would take
to float his idea.
Lober drew up plans for a boat big enough to accommodate up to 150
passengers, but with a three-foot draft to keep from running aground in the
notoriously shallow Clear Lake and Galveston Bay.
"I wanted to be able to take that boat anywhere on the lake," which is five
feet deep in places, he said.
Bankers were skeptical when he approached them for a loan.
"This was a new business in Houston that had never been done before," Lober
said. "They had no confidence.
"I finally got to the point where I'd just take my business plan into a bank
and say, `I know I'm not going to get a loan - just look at what I've got and
tell me what it needs,' " he said.
Even without a loan in place, Lober began hands-on research. During the week,
he still worked at his father's supply boat business, but flew to Fort
Lauderdale, Fla., on weekends to work as a deck hand and food server for a
charter yacht company to learn the business from the bottom up.
After a year of loan seeking, he found a lender at the Passenger Vessel
Association's annual meeting. Caterpillar Finance agreed to lend him 60
percent of the $950,000 in construction costs if he installed Caterpillar
engines on the boat.
Construction took a year, during which Lober continued his research, serving
drinks on weekends aboard a charter boat on the Detroit River and Lake St.
Clair.
Finally, Lober launched Star Gazer in October 1993.
The maritime academy might have taught him how to navigate by the stars, but
it didn't prepare him for marketing.
"I didn't know what I was doing," Lober said. "The first year, I spent
$125,000 in marketing blunders," including a $50,000 mass mail campaign that
he called "a total flop."
Marketing was twice as expensive as he thought it would be and took twice as
long for potential customers to understand the concept he was trying to sell,
he said. Meanwhile, his boat sat in the stall for up to three weeks at a
time.
Lober had a $30,000 monthly overhead in debt service, office rental,
insurance and slip fees, and "I still had to pay it if the boat didn't leave
once," he said.
Panicked, he joined the Greater Houston Partnership to seek out ideas, and he
got one: target marketing.
He and his small staff scrutinized every detail about the people who used the
boat and set out to find more like them. He set his sights on the corporate
client, which makes up about 70 percent of his business today. Corporate
customers include Enron, Exxon Mobil, Shell, Continental Airlines and Katy
Mills mall.
"We have had our party with Star Fleet every year for five years," said Ravi
Lal, director of ethylene division of Technip, based in San Dimas, Calif.
"The first year, I wanted to do something special that I hadn't seen before.
Everybody likes it, and everybody wants to come back."
Business slowly began to build, and word spread. Lober added the 90-foot Star
Cruiser in 1997, the 74-foot Star Spirit in 1999, and brought in a fourth,
the Lake Limo, last month. Also in 1999, he bought 6 acres with 600 feet of
waterfront and built Star Fleet Marina. While part of that land is still
undeveloped, it eventually will become a parking lot for 500 cars when Lober
adds a fifth large yacht, Star Ship, sometime in the future.
"We plan to add Star Ship when we're turning down enough business from the
other boats," he said.
After more than eight years, Lober has yet to take home a salary, putting
everything back into the business.
The more he puts back, the more business he can accommodate.
But Lober and his staff still keep close tabs on their customers.
"We track everything - which individuals, what type of event, whether they
prefer sit-down dinners, how they heard about us - you name it," he said.
It's a lot of details. He knows that blackout shades, pull-down projector
screens and multiple microphone jacks are needed for presentations, and that
some clients like to be picked up at one of the Galveston hotels or other
locations on the Houston Ship Channel.
If a customer hires a deejay, a crewmember provides padding to put underneath
the CD player on the bandstand because dancing on the steel dance floor
causes the player to bounce.
Lober's three full-time cruise consultants handle charter buses to and from
the marina, limos, menus, photographers and decorations. They work with Star
Fleet's in-house florist and theme designer to provide floral arrangements
for sit-down dinners and Hawaiian leis of fresh orchids and hibiscus for a
major retailer's party, for which the florist helped transform the boat's
stanchions into palm trees.
And consultants have their own suggestions, such as bestowing captains' hats
instead of the usual corsages to employees with top sales who were being
honored at a recent floating awards banquet.
Lober believes his company's custom service brings customers back.
"They handle all the details once, and after customers go on that first
cruise, they're sold on the concept," he said. "People love something
different. We provide a different kind of party. If they do it once, they
usually want to do it again."
But cruises aren't limited to parties, Lober said. Customers have chartered
boats for banquets, retreats, new product introductions, incentive awards
dinners and for scattering loved ones' ashes.
About 60 percent of Star Fleet's business is repeat and referral. The recent
corporate party featuring the Mae West look-alike was the fifth the company
has chosen to have with Star Fleet.
Part of Lober's initial marketing problem - which continues today - is that
Houstonians just don't realize how close to the water they are.
"It's not like Fort Lauderdale, where water is part of the landscape," he
said. "In Houston, there's no high-visibility location to see the water, just
one spot on Loop 610 that overlooks the Port of Houston. Even in Clear Lake,
there are only one or two places when you drive around the lake that you can
actually see the water. We don't have a San Francisco Bay or New York Harbor.
So people have to be reminded."
He also has to deal with the misconception that only the very rich can afford
cruises, Lober said.
"Some people think they can't afford a luxury yacht, but when they compare
our complete package with upscale restaurants, hotel banquet facilities,
country clubs and wedding manors, we are quite competitive," he said. "And
our food is gourmet quality. Just like a five-star hotel, we never cut
corners."
Event cruises start at $40 per guest including food, bar, entertainment, tax
and gratuities.
Lober depends heavily on customer surveys to develop the service he and his
crew provide. And customers informally give Star Fleet staff new ideas with
some of the extras they bring aboard, such as the squirt guns, Mardi Gras
beads, Hula Hoops and limbo sticks.
"We learn a lot from our customers," he said. "We see what they do, take the
best and give it back to them."
Because customer surveys indicate that about 20 percent of Star Fleet's
business comes from being seen on the water, Lober and his captains make
their crafts as visible as possible whenever they take them out. The real
opportunity for hot-dogging comes when a customer charters two or three
boats, and they raft up to become the Star Fleet flotilla, with customers
moving from one boat to another. A three-boat charter can handle up to 375
guests.
But one boat can still do a lot of advertising.
At the recent corporate party, Mae West joined the other revelers who were
slinging Mardi Gras beads at al fresco diners as Capt. Tony DeFore edged Star
Gazer close to the Kemah waterfront. They may not have known it, but they
were doing a little of Lober's public relations work for him.
As the boat pulled back into the Star Fleet Marina, Lober pointed out a barge
under construction. When it is finished - by the end of the year, he hopes -
the bottom floor will be a galley for food preparation, the second the Star
Fleet office and the third floor an 1,800-square-foot apartment.
It will kind of resemble that three-tiered wooden box he brought home from
school years ago, Lober says.
And he's going to live at the top.

Photos: 1-2. Left: Star Gazer, first of the Star Fleet Entertainment Yachts,
launched in 1993, sets sail for Southshore Harbor earlier this month. From
left to right are bartender Bridget Byous, server Leona Clark, Cruise
Director Edith Mitchell and President Tom Lober. Below: Cruise Director Edith
Mitchell unties the Star Gazer's bow line (color); 3. Star Fleet
Entertainment yachts President Tom Lober watches server Leona Clark polish
silverware for a buffet dinner aboard the Star Gazer. Last year, the company
booked more than 400 cruises, generating $2.3 million (color, p. 4)

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

More power to reform agenda
Soma Banerjee

05/13/2001
The Economic Times
Copyright (C) 2001 The Economic Times; Source: World Reporter (TM)

THE electricity industry is often identified as the black sheep in the
infrastructure sector which has continued to lag behind despite an overdose
of government support.
Despite being one of the earlier industries to be opened up, private
investments in this sector have failed to take off.
Worse, the only sizeable project which was something to write home about
Enrons Dabhol Power plant in Maharashtra is currently a under cloud with its
promoters involved in a legal battle with the state entity and its sole
consumer for non-payment of bills. Policy makers and investors in the energy
sector are still groping to find ways and means to improve the performance of
this key industry.
Although private investments were expected to come in a big way in creating
new capacities, policy uncertainties and above all the poor financial health
of the consumer, in most cases the SEBs, have posed major problems for power
plant developers.
After about ten years of liberalisation, the private sector has to its credit
only about 5000 MW and according to projections by experts investments in
greenfield projects are unlikely before four to five years.
The factors that have been taken into consideration in the current projection
are almost inbuilt into the system. For one, there is a general agreement
that stressing on generation alone without doing much on the distribution
front has eroded the financial health of most SEBs.
``Private power developers cannot be expected to invest in projects till they
are assured that they will be paid for the energy produced, experts say.
But like the recent Montek Singh Ahluwalia report maintains, such reforms
cannot be done overnight and will require minimum five to seven years before
they break even.
The sector has already seen major exits like Cogentrix and Powergen and if
the current trends are anything to go by it would not be long before Enron
too says Sayonara India, claim sources in the power industry.
IPPAI, an association for private power investments, feels that the flip-flop
by the government as far as power policies are concerned have made it
difficult for investors to take decisions.
``Take this as an example at one time there were more than 200 MoUs signed up
for private power projects, the government provided counter guarantees for
eight projects, of which only three have taken off. Of this the Enron project
is already facing problems of nonpayment, says a senior source.
According to estimates drawn up by financial institutions like Power Finance
Corporation an organisation responsible for monitoring the financial health
of the SEBs and helping them with their reform programmes almost all the SEBs
have registered a negative turnover. Which is why the financing or
escrowability of SEBs across the country has been reduced to zero.
According to Union power minister Suresh Prabhu, the states are now
responsive to changes and reforms and the recent drive initiated by the
Centre to work with the state governments was expected to yield results.
But this sector has seen far too many committees which have failed to yield
much hope and it is only sheer determination of SEBs and political will that
can help this backbencher.

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

India Power Min: New Power Deal With Enron Unit Possible
By Himendra Kumar
Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES

05/12/2001
Dow Jones International News
(Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)

NEW DELHI -(Dow Jones)- India is hopeful the Maharashtra State Electricity
Board's power purchase agreement with the U.S. energy company Enron Corp.'s
(ENE) Indian unit Dabhol Power Co. can be renegotiated and the DPC's dispute
over payments be settled, the country's federal Power Minister Suresh Prabhu
said.
In a weekend interview with Dow Jones Newswires, Prabhu said the very fact
that the DPC had come to the negotiating table for discussions on its power
price was an indication that Enron was keen to save its India project.
A special panel, set up by the Maharashtra state government, met with
representatives of the DPC, for the first time Friday and agreed to another
meeting May 23.
Friday's meeting lasted for more than two hours.
"I am of the view that a negotiated settlement is possible since the first
meeting of DPC with the Maharahtra state expert panel went off well. There
has been a positive response both from the DPC and the MSEB after the
meeting. The central government will also reciprocate by participating in a
meaningful dialogue. The next meeting will really decide on how it all goes,"
Prabhu said.
Earlier this week, in an e-mail to Dow Jones Newswires from Houston, Enron
Vice President John Ambler however, said, "While we have constantly
maintained that we are open to continuing a dialogue towards resolving
issues, this (Friday) meeting should in no manner be construed as an open
offer from DPC to renegotiate the terms of the contract."
The Maharashtra state government contends that the price paid for electricity
from the Dabhol power plant, India's biggest-ever foreign investment at $2.9
billion, is "unaffordable" and seeks to renegotiate tariffs.
A recent committee appointed by the government, the Godbole panel,
recommended that the power purchase agreement be renegotiated.
Dabhol has come under fire because of the relatively high cost of its power.
Critics object to Dabhol charging 7.1 rupees ($1=INR46.8825) a kilowatt-hour
for its power, compared with INR1.5/kwh charged by other suppliers.
The 2,184-megawatt DPC project in Maharashtra has been mired in financial
disputes after the Maharashtra State Electricity Board, its main customer,
failed to pay the December 2000 and January bills. The Godbole panel is
working toward lowering the DPC's power tariff and allowing the sale of
excess power to the federal government or its utilities. A restructuring of
the DPC's stakeholding may also be on the agenda.
The Maharashtra government has asked the committee to try to negotiate a
revised agreement within a month. The DPC currently operates a 740-megawatt
naphtha plant contributing about 0.7% to India's installed capacity. Enron
has maintained that work will be completed by the year-end in the second
phase of the Dabhol project that will add 1,444 MW to its capacity. The plant
will switch from naphtha to liquefied natural gas as a fuel source in 2002.
Texas-based Enron has a 65% stake in the DPC and is the project's largest
shareholder. Other shareholders include the MSEB with 15%, and General
Electric Co. (GE) and Bechtel Enterprises (X.BTL) with 10% each.
-By Himendra Kumar, Dow Jones Newswires; 91-11-461-9427;
himendra.kumar@dowjones.com

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

India: Talks begin on Dabhol issue

05/12/2001
Business Line (The Hindu)
Copyright (C) 2001 Kasturi & Sons Ltd (KSL); Source: World Reporter (TM) -
Asia Intelligence Wire

MUMBAI, May 11. OFFICIALS of Enron India today met the expert committee
headed by Dr Madhav Godbole to discuss the fate of Enron's Dabhol Power
Company.
Mr A.V. Gokak, Union Government representative, who was appointed only last
night, could not attend the meeting due to the short notice.
Lenders to the project who were to attend the meeting stayed away.
Instead, Mr A.G. Karkhanis, former Executive Director, Industrial Development
Bank of India, attended as observer on behalf of foreign and Indian lenders,
Mr Vinay Mohan Lal, Energy Secretary, told reporters here after the meeting.
When asked about Enron's reluctance to renegotiate, Mr Lal said: "They are
coming again on May 23. What does that mean?"
Though none of those present at the meeting was willing to give more details,
senior State Government officials had earlier told Business Line that the
State would be willing to discuss phase II only after a decision on the
rebate slapped on DPC.
"Basically our strategy will be to bring the Rs 401- crore rebate payable by
DPC to the centre-stage," the official said. "The company has not mentioned a
single word about the rebate in any of their letters to either the MSEB or
the State. And we, on the other hand, have discussed anything but the rebate
in our letters to DPC," he said.
Mr Wade Cline, Managing Director, Enron India, did not comment on whether the
company would issue the preliminary termination notice.
The Maharashtra State Electricity Board (MSEB) Chairman, Mr Vinay Bansal, and
Mr Lal had last evening briefed the Democratic Front constituents about their
stand vis-a-vis Enron.
They are understood to have told the political brass of the State that MSEB
does not need the second phase of the Dabhol power project.
They categorically said MSEB would not buy power from DPC-phase II, it is
learnt.
MSEB also reiterated its stand that DPC should adjust the dues owed by it
against the non-performance penalty.
Senior MSEB officials said the board had replied to the arbitration notice
issued by DPC and made its position clear. The board is of the opinion that
DPC should adjust Rs 213 crore - the December and January bills - against the
Rs 401 crore penalty for performance default.
The State Government also has backed the MSEB in its replies to the three
arbitration notices served on it. It has said that since MSEB does not accept
the charges - non-compliance with the power purchase agreement (PPA) -
leveled against it, the State is not bound to pay.
The Centre too is understood to have backed MSEB in its preliminary reply to
the conciliation notice from DPC.
Today's meeting was attended by Mr Cline, Mr Neil McGregor, President, DPC,
Mr Mukesh Tyagi, Vice-President, DPC, and Mr Sanjeev Khandekar, VP, DPC, and
Mr Mohan Gurunath, Chief Financial Officer, DPC.
Among the renegotiation panel members, Mr Deepak Parekh, Mr E A S Sarma and
Mr Kirit Parikh were also unable to attend. The next meeting is scheduled on
May 23, Mr Lal said.
Gokak nominated to panel: The Government has nominated former fertiliser and
telecom secretary, Mr A.V. Gokak, to the arbitration committee involving
Dabhol Power Company (DPC).
The Power Ministry had earlier mooted the additional solicitor general, Mr
Harish Salve's candidature for the job.
The conciliation process, however, has been hanging fire as the third
conciliator is yet to be appointed. Dabhol Power Company had written to the
Centre last month seeking six names for selection of a mutually acceptable
conciliator to kick- start the conciliation process.
DPC's letter to the Finance Ministry was seen in the context of the
substantial delay between the initiation of the conciliation process three
weeks ago and the finalisation of the conciliators. Soon after the
conciliation process was initiated, DPC decided to invoke political force
majeure and moved in for arbitration - a prelude to termination of the
project.
Our Bureau

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

India to allow 3rd party sale if DPC, MSEB jointly approach

05/12/2001
Press Trust of India Limited
(c) 2001 PTI Ltd.

Mumbai, May 12 (PTI) The Federal Government will allow sale of power to a
"willing buyer" if the Enron-promoted Dabhol Power Company (DPC) and
Maharashtra State Electricity Board (MSEB) will together approach the power
ministry with a concrete proposal for their 2,184 mw project in Dabhol.
"I will give whatever status they want, including a mega project one, if DPC
and MSEB jointly approach the Centre (Federal Government) for the same",
Indian Power Minister Suresh Prabhu told reporters here Saturday.
He said the Indian Government would extend its cooperation to the Maharashtra
government (western state) "in every way" to resolve the imbroglio between
MSEB and DPC.
When pointed out that both the state government and DPC were of the opinion
that federal power utility National Thermal Power Corporation (NTPC) should
buy the power, Prabhu said NTPC cannot do so as it was power selling entity
and not buying one.
"There is no question of NTPC buying power from the project since long term
power purchase agreements (PPAs) have been signed by NTPC with the buying
states", he reiterated.
Prabhu said the Indian Government would also try and find out potential
buyers of DPC power "if other states were willing to buy the same".
Earlier in his meeting with state chief minister Vilasrao Deshmukh, the
latter had suggested that NTPC sell the excess power over and above the
300-400 MW needed for the state from the 740 MW phase-I and soon to be
commissioned phase-II of 1,444 MW, to other needy states.
(THROUGH ASIA PULSE) 12-05 2001

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

LOCAL STORIES
DEFAZIO CALLS FOR STATE TO BUY PGE TO PROTECT RATES
DAVE HOGAN AND JEFF MAPES of the Oregonian Staff

05/12/2001
Portland Oregonian
SUNRISE
C01
(Copyright (c) The Oregonian 2001)

Summary: The suggestion generates little enthusiasm and critics suspect it's
motivated by the lawmaker's possible race for governor
"I believe this is an extraordinary opportunity and a way that we can
insulate almost a quarter of our population and a core of Oregon's business
community from the craziness that is going on in the energy wholesale
markets." -- U.S. REP. PETER DeFAZIO D-ORE.
The state of Oregon should consider buying investor-owned Portland General
Electric to help protect Oregonians from gyrations in the electricity market,
U.S. Rep. Peter DeFazio declared Friday.
Gov. John Kitzhaber reacted politely and said he'll explore the idea, but
others said it's a long shot because of political, financial and timing
factors.
Critics said the proposal appeared aimed more at attracting attention to
DeFazio's potential candidacy for governor than anything else.
Several companies already are considering buying the utility, but DeFazio
said state ownership could help keep PGE customers' electricity rates low and
generate profits that could help the rest of Oregon.
"I believe this is an extraordinary opportunity and a way that we can
insulate almost a quarter of our population and a core of Oregon's business
community from the craziness that is going on in the energy wholesale
markets," said DeFazio, D-Ore.
PGE serves about 725,000 retail customers, mostly in the Portland area, and
is owned by Houston-based Enron Corp. PGE's sale to Nevada's Sierra Pacific
Resources for $3.1 billion officially fell apart last month. Other possible
buyers include Northwest Natural and ScottishPower, which owns PacifiCorp.
While Enron and PGE officials declined to comment Friday, legislative leaders
showed no particular enthusiasm for DeFazio's idea.
"I appreciate his efforts, but I don't think it's the right idea at this
time," said House Speaker Mark Simmons, R-Elgin. He said the state already
has a package of bills aimed at spurring more energy production and
conservation.
Senate President Gene Derfler, R-Salem, said he'd be willing to sit down and
talk with DeFazio. "I would not just shut the door," he said, but he doesn't
plan to devote much work to the proposal. Derfler questioned whether state
government could run a utility as efficiently as a business.
DeFazio said a PGE purchase would offer several benefits. State ownership
would put control of PGE in local hands instead of those of a faraway
corporation such as ScottishPower. For PGE customers, state ownership would
provide some protection and stability in electricity rates. It also would be
a good investment that would pay for itself and perhaps pump revenue back
into the state's coffers.
The purchase could be financed with tax-exempt bonds sold by the state.
DeFazio said state Treasurer Randall Edwards had told him the idea was "in
the realm of possibility."
DeFazio's idea is an intriguing one and could provide some benefits, said Bob
Jenks, executive director of the Citizens' Utility Board, which represents
customers of investor-owned utilities such as PGE.
Jenks said the primary benefit would be that, if the state bought PGE, the
utility would be able to buy lower-priced electricity from the Bonneville
Power Administration, which is required to sell power at lower rates to
publicly owned utilities. However, a publicly owned PGE wouldn't be able to
buy the lower-priced BPA power for about five years because of electricity
sales contracts that already are in place.
And even if PGE were able to buy lower-priced BPA power, that wouldn't
necessarily translate to lower electricity bills for PGE customers, Jenks
said. In addition, he said it could increase rates for other publicly owned
utilities because the BPA has a shortage of cheap hydropower.
The state Public Utility Commission would have to approve any sale of PGE,
but outgoing PUC Chairman Ron Eachus criticized DeFazio's proposal, saying it
had the potential to increase rates both for PGE customers and for publicly
owned utilities. He also said it seemed designed to get political attention
for DeFazio's potential candidacy.
"I think we're in the political season where people are proposing grandiose
schemes that aren't very well thought out, and this seems to be one of
those," Eachus said.
DeFazio conceded that a high-profile proposal focused on a Portland-area
issue such as the ownership of PGE would be a good way for a candidate to
build support for a run for governor, but he said that had nothing to do with
his plan.
You can reach Dave Hogan at 503-221-8531 or by e-mail at
davehogan@news.oregonian.com.

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Congressman suggests state buy PGE
By CHARLES E. BEGGS
Associated Press Writer

05/11/2001
Associated Press Newswires
Copyright 2001. The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.

SALEM, Ore. (AP) - Congressman Peter DeFazio on Friday proposed that the
state buy Portland General Electric as a way to hold down power costs.
The Democrat outlined his plan after presenting it to Gov. John Kitzhaber,
who said he would ask his energy advisers to analyze it.
PGE is Oregon's biggest electric utility, serving more than 700,000
customers. DeFazio said a state purchase of the company could insulate many
Oregonians from "the craziness in power markets."
DeFazio said the state could buy the company by issuing revenue bonds and
have the utility operate as a public power entity.
He said the purchase would give the state a diverse mix of transmission
rights along with hydropower, gas, coal and renewable energy sources.
"While I have not exhaustively researched the proposal, it does appear to be
feasible," said DeFazio, an opponent of electric deregulation.
Enron Corp., the Texas-based owner of PGE, is trying to sell the utility.
Sierra Pacific last month abandoned its plan to buy PGE for $3.1 billion,
citing increasing difficulties in the current market and the political
environment in the West.
Kitzhaber said he's not opposed to the idea of the state buying a private
utility, as long as it would benefit consumers.
DeFazio said PGE has been a profitable company, and putting it in public
ownership could give it preference over private utilities for the Bonneville
Power Administration's hydropower.
The congressman's suggestion wasn't welcomed by the Legislature.
"Thanks, but no thanks," said House Speaker Mark Simmons.
"Philosophically, I think it's the wrong approach," he said. "We have a
bipartisan package of bills dealing with the issue."
Among those are his measure to delay partial electric deregulation for large
businesses and a bill to speed up the process for siting temporary generating
plants.
Senate President Gene Derfler didn't reject the idea, but said the
Legislature doesn't have enough time in the current session to take on a job
like a utility purchase.

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.


---------------------- Forwarded by Andrea Ring/HOU/ECT on 05/02/2001 04:06
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Karen D McIlvoy                           04/10/2001 08:20 AM

To: ragan.bond@bhlp.com
cc:  (bcc: Andrea Ring/HOU/ECT)
Subject: Fwd:

A beautiful woman loved growing tomatoes, but couldn't seem to get her
tomatoes to turn red. One day while taking a stroll she came upon a
gentleman neighbor who had the most beautiful garden full of huge red
tomatoes.

The woman asked the gentleman, "What do you do to get your tomatoes so
red?" The gentleman responded, "Twice a day I stand in front of my tomato
garden and expose myself, and my tomatoes turn red from blushing so much."

 The woman was so impressed, she decided to try doing the same
 thing to her tomato garden to see if it would work. So twice a day for two
weeks she exposed herself to her garden hoping for the best

  One day the gentleman was passing by and asked the woman, "By the way,
How did you make out? Did your tomatoes turn red?"

"No" she replied, "but my cucumbers are enormous!"


I told you that I don't have it with me - it's in my fucking car and if you
ask again I will have to come up there and stick that pager up your ass.
How's that for a reply?


Please grant Steven Vu execution privileges on EOL
John Arnold


Pls. feed me your respective comments so we can move ahead with this ASAP.

Mark (Holsworth),  I would appreciate it if you could make sure your initial
comments are addressed and point me in the right direction with regards to
negotiations while Mark (Taylor) is away.

Thanks,
Rahil
3-3206
---------------------- Forwarded by Rahil Jafry/HOU/ECT on 04/24/2000 02:32
PM ---------------------------

"Leisa Byron" <byron@ntms1.accuweather.com> on 04/24/2000 01:15:07 PM
To: <rahil.jafry@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: AccuNet Agreement

Mr. Jafry:
?
As per your telephone conversation with Erik  Bjalme, attached please find
the Agreement for AccuNet Service.? Should you  have any questions, please
contact either Erik or myself.
?
Thank you.
 - EnronCorporation2.doc


That's fine.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jacoby, Ben
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 9:36 AM
To: Mann, Kay
Subject: FW: Haywood

Kay:

I didn't get a chance to send the letter out today, but will do so tomorrow. Is it OK for me to send it out to AES without your initials, but with you intialing the copy we retain for our records? In the past, we typically provided payment direction to AES by e-mail.

Let me know.

-----Original Message-----
From: 	Jacoby, Ben
Sent:	Thursday, December 20, 2001 9:56 AM
To:	Gorte, David
Cc:	Schneider, Chip; Zisman, Stuart; Mann, Kay
Subject:	RE: Haywood

Thanks Dave. We'll send the letter out today.
Regards,
--------------------------
Ben Jacoby
(713) 853-6173


Wow...I must say this was the last thing I expected you to be emailing me about.  I'll try and give you a call after work ( around 4:30 or so ) if you want to talk about it some more, just let me know.  I do think it's good that you guys are at least talking about all this stuff regardless of what you decide is the right for both of you.

Sorry to hear about Jay...that is horrible.  What brings on shingles anyway?  I thought it has something to do with stress, but I could be totally off.

Glad you like the CD...I've been listening to it non-stop.  I'm totally empowered after "I'm Alright" and then plunge into super-reflective mode with "Wildest Dreams".  Get on the Kim Richey web site and read the lyrics and you'll understand why.  By the way, she's playing at Stubb's on June 14th and in Houston at The Fabulous Satellite Lounge on the 16th....food for thought.

As for my call, there was some news...he contacted me around 10 am or so and we chatted throughout the day.  I'll tell you more about it when I call, but you're only going to be a bigger fan.  That of course is the problem I'm having.

Talk to you soon,
Sue

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"corey leahy" <celeahy@hotmail.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22corey+20leahy+22+20+3Cceleahy+40hotmail+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Wednesday, May 30, 2001 9:56 AM
To:	Scott, Susan M.
Subject:

Hey Susan-
I got your message last night but it was late-- Doug and I went to see Pearl Harbor.  I thought I wasn't going to like it, but I did.
I took him to work this morning, and he was asking me about the law firm parties this summer-- was he going to be coming in for them, etc.  Although I hadn't planned to, I suggested that we take the summer off from dating.  We had a long conversation about it, and he was much better about it than he has been in the past.  It made me wonder...  He said he had thought about that kind of thing, too, but didn't want to do it.  But, if I needed it, he said he would be okay with it.  He did say he might join the Marines rather than go to law school.  I have always thought that is what he wanted to do, so maybe I am being less selfish by breaking up with him.  I don't know.  I feel pretty bad about it.  I just think this is probably a mistake, but I explained to him that I have had a boyfriend my entire adult life and I am wondering what it would be like without one.  He is in just about the same boat reagrding having had a ! girlfriend for the vast majority of his adult years.
Anyway, we might have lunch together, and we will definitely talk about it after he gets home from work.
On another note, Jay has shingles.  Isn't that sad.  I looked it up in my medical book-- they are very painful and leave scars-- and she has them on her face.  How awful!
I bought that Kim Richey CD yesterday.  I love it!
Were you calling with any news?
-Corey

Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com << File: http://explorer.msn.com >>


Mike Grigsby has been in contact with Inside FERC regarding posting an index
at the Cheyenne Hub in the future.  Based on their request, we are providing
our trade data for your review.

Attached, please find a spreadsheet containing all  Fixed Price Physical
Trades transacted by Enron during the April Bid-week for May Baseload Flow at
Cheyenne Hub points.  In addition to the trades listed, Enron provided
further liquidity at Cheyenne with 7 index related deals that have not been
included in the list.

Please let me know if you have any questions or comments.

Thank you.

Anne Bike


Congrats on your promotion.  You are very deserving!

Peggy


Fuel is retained in kind from the shippers.
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


?
 - Management Services Agreement1.doc
 - PaloAlto TA.doc
 - SierraPowerTA No3.doc


Yes, they did.  Sorry I didn't call you back.  I left a message for Steve,
though.

To: Rebecca W Cantrell/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: JAB Data Request Respones

Were you able to confirm that they received our Fedex?

	Rebecca W Cantrell
	05/22/2000 12:23 PM

		 To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: JAB Data Request Respones

FYI.  I don't think our contribution is included, since I sent it to Doug
John.

---------------------- Forwarded by Rebecca W Cantrell/HOU/ECT on 05/22/2000
12:22 PM ---------------------------

"James Sarikas" <jsarikas@foster-fa.com> on 05/22/2000 10:34:24 AM
Please respond to <jsarikas@foster-fa.com>
To: "Kim M. Clark" <kclark@jhenergy.com>, "John Brickhill"
<hrknmtn@foster-fa.com>, "John Paganis" <jpaganis@hess.com>, "Greg Troxell"
<gatroxell@nipsco.com>, "Roxane Maywalt" <RMAYWALT@sablaw.com>, "Mary
Klyasheff" <m.klyasheff@pecorp.com>, "Simon B. Halflin"
<s.halfin@pecorp.com>, "Rebecca W. Cantrell" <rebecca.w.cantrell@enron.com>,
"Lori Marlatt" <lmarlatt@br-inc.com>, "Gregory J. Porter"
<GJPorter@midamerican.com>, "Gearold L. Knowles" <gknowles@schiffhardin.com>,
"Edward J. Grenier" <egrenier@sablaw.com>, "Curt Westerhausen"
<cawesterhausen@nipsco.com>, "Cecelia Largura" <cjlargura@nisource.com>, "Tim
Caister" <trcaister@nisource.com>, "Kirk Lavengood"
<kllavengood@midamerican.com>, "Steve Van Hooser"
<steve.van.hooser@enron.com>, "Dorothy Mersereau"
<Dorothy_Mersereau@br-inc.ca>
cc: "Bambi L. Heckerman" <Bambi.Heckerman@enron.com>
Subject: JAB Data Request Respones

Attached is final data request reponses by John Brickhill.

Jim
 - JAB Data Request Responses - ALL.pdf


Hi Mr. Reed -

I left a message on Thursday evening for Rosemarie, but was out Friday, so
was too busy to follow up today, but having said all that, Ken Lay wanted me
to let you know that he would like to have the TFA board meeting at the Enron
building.  Please let me know if that will be possible.

Rosalee

"Will Reed" <will.reed@techforall.org> on 04/02/2001 01:33:14 PM
Please respond to <will.reed@techforall.org>
To: "Jack J. Valenti" <jvalenti@mpaa.org>, "Jack T. Trotter"
<jtt@jttrotter.com>, "Andrew J. Clark III" <Clark97@swbell.net>, "F. Scott
Yeager" <Scott_Yeager@enron.net>, "Peter Douglas" <pdouglas@salus.net>, "John
H. Duncan Sr." <JHDUNCAN@aol.com>, "Kenneth L. Lay" <klay@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: GOOD NEWS!...and TFA Board meeting

Gentlemen,

Technology For All (TFA)received today our 501(c)(3) exemption letter
from the IRS.  This letter gives us the opportunity to vigorously
pursue new funding opportunities and also validates what we have known
all along. TFA is a charitable organization serving the underserved in
communities across the US.

We thank Jack Clark, our general counsel, for his arduous pro-bono
legal work over the past 15 months that helped make this happen.
THANKS JACK!!!

On another note, each of you should have received word from Rosemarie
Foster, TFA's Administrative Assistant, regarding a Technology For All
Board meeting scheduled for Tuesday, May 8, 2001 at the University
Hilton on the University of Houston Campus.  The meeting will take
place at 2:00 PM and conclude by 3:30 PM.  It will take place in the
context of an all-day Technology For All sponsored conference "Digital
Divide: A Call to Action".  Each of you will receive an complimentary
invitation to the activities of the day.  Ken Lay will be hosting a
CEO breakfast at 8:00 am.  Our purpose there will be to tell the TFA
story and invite the CEO's present to make a commitment to help TFA
eliminate the digital divide across Houston and beyond.  At lunch,
Greg Priest, CEO of SmartForce, will be speaking. SmartForce recently
gave TFA access to all its online eLearning content.  This gift will
allow TFA to provide workforce training opportunities to half a
million persons over the next three years.  We will thank SmartForce
during the luncheon for their enormous gift which has a retail value
that could be as high as nine figures (depending on the number of
courses utilized).

Regards,

Will

---------------------------
Technology For All
"We Bring Technology to Underserved Communities"
Will Reed, President/COO
109 North Post Oak Lane, Suite 425
Houston, Texas  77024
USA

Direct, 713.316.5761
Assistant, 713.316.5764 (Rosemarie Foster)
FAX 713.316.5790

TFA Operations Center
3405 Edloe
Suite 300
Houston, Texas  77027
713.961.9945
http://www.techforall.org
E-Mail will.reed@techforall.org


Do you guys agree with the rate?
---------------------- Forwarded by Lauri A Allen/HOU/ECT on 02/24/2000 02:51
PM ---------------------------
   Kellie Bilski                02/24/2000 02:19 PM

To: Lauri A Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Midcon Invoices

Midcon is billing us $.05 from Katy to Cogen.

Lauri A Allen
02/24/2000 01:57 PM
To: Kellie Bilski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Elsa Villarreal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Midcon Invoices

Kellie-

I researched the statements you sent me and found deal ticket #109925 in
Sitara which shows HPLC transporting on Midcon from Live Oak to Hardy Street
for $.04/mm for the months of August and September.

The statement for November covers gas moving from Katy tailgate to Cogen
Lyondell and is covered by Sitara deal ticket #133257.  The deal ticket shows
a zero rate, however.  Elsa/Daren- do either of you remember this deal?  It
was on November 30th for 5000mm.  Kellie- what is Midcon charging for this
haul?

Thanks.


Attached is the Errata to the "Prepared Direct Testimony of Harry J.
Kingerski on Behalf of Enron Energy Services Inc."  This errata (to which
the changes from the original version are highlighted) will be the version
offered into evidence when Mr. Kingerski testifies tomorrow (April 20,
2001).

Additional copies of the testimony will be available in the hearing room.

 <<X23727.DOC>>

Jeanne Bennett

Attorney for Enron Energy Services, Inc.

 - X23727.DOC