-----Original Message-----
From: 	soblander@carrfut.com@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-soblander+40carrfut+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Friday, June 08, 2001 12:00 PM
To:	Griffith, John
Subject:	RSI

----- Forwarded by Scott Oblander/ICF on 06/08/2001 12:01 PM -----

            CARR FUTURES
            Heffner                       To:    Scott Oblander/ICF@ICF
             - Chicago 150 SW             cc:
                                          From:  Mike Heffner
                                          Phone:      312-368-2205
                                          Date:  06/08/2001 11:50 AM
                                          Subject:

Relative Strength Index is a price momentum indicator. Mathematically, RSI
is represented as:

RSI = 100 - [ 100 / (1+ RS) ]
where,

RS is the ratio of the exponentially smoothed moving average of n-period
gains divided by the absolute value (i.e., ignoring sign) of the
exponentially smoothed moving average of n-period losses.


All transactions with these parties expired as of 3/31 there are no
outstanding deals.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Jerry,  The entities to be parties to the confidentiality agreement are:

ECS Compression Company, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company

Transwestern Pipeline Company, a Delaware company


Attached is a list of accomplishment for 2000.


fyi - Jade Eaton is one of Lara's contacts at DOJ
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 03/02/2001 01:12 PM -----

	Lara Leibman@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
	02/28/2001 03:23 PM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Re: HPL Closing

Steve,

Thanks for forwarding.  Actually, Brian sent it to me on Monday, and I
followed up with Ann and Barbara.  I have not spoken with Brian yet because I
am waiting for a green/red light from Barbara as far as Jade Eaton is
concerned.  Barbara and I spoke at length yesterday and she is concerned
about the counterparty's reaction to a meeting with DOJ (even an informal
one).  She plans to get back to me though with regard to whether they want me
to get involved at this stage.  I spoke to Rick as well so he is up-to-date
with the current status.

I'll let you know if anything further develops.  Thanks again.

Lara

	Steven J Kean@ENRON
	02/28/01 02:13 PM

		 To: Lara Leibman/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc:
		 Subject: HPL Closing

----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 02/28/2001 02:12 PM -----

	Brian Redmond@ECT
	02/26/2001 02:57 PM

		 To: John J Lavorato/Enron@EnronXGate, Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT, David W
Delainey/HOU/EES@EES, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Oxley/Enron@EnronXGate, Wes
Colwell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tim DeSpain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joseph
Deffner/Enron@EnronXGate, Anne C Koehler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barbara N
Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim Coffey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ann Ballard/enron@enronxgate, Jim
Schwieger/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas A Martin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe Allen/NA/Enron@Enron, Tommy
Yanowski/Enron@EnronXGate, Philippe A Bibi/Enron@EnronXGate, Patrick
Wade/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Rohauer/Enron@EnronXGate, Fran L
Mayes/Enron@EnronXGate, Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carolyn
Gilley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert L Hall/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Ranabir
Dutt/Enron@EnronXGate, Tom Shelton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve HPL
Schneider/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kenneth W Kaase/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: HPL Closing

Please find the attached status update for the HPL transaction.  If you have
any questions please contact me.

Thanks,
Brian


Enerfax Daily
NORTH AMERICA'S FREE POWER AND GAS INFORMATION SOURCE
              Monday, January 28 2002 No. 921
Visit: http://www.enerfax.com to view our web version or for Oil
Prices & News http://www.enerfaxgold.com

PHYSICAL NATURAL GAS PRICES ??
Gulf/Eastern Region
| Agua Dulce               | 1.92  |
| ANR SE                   | 1.97  |
| Carthage TG              | 1.95  |
| Chicago Citygate         | 2.03  |
| Columbia Gulf Onshore    | 2.00  |
| Dominion South Point     | 2.11  |
| Henry Hub                | 2.03  |
| Houston Ship Channel     | 2.04  |
| Katy Hub                 | 1.97  |
| NGPL LA Pool             | 1.95  |
| NGPL - Midcontinent      | 1.91  |
| NGPL STX                 | 1.93  |
| NGPL TX/OK               | 1.93  |
| NNG Demarc.              | 1.96  |
| Niagara                  | 2.18  |
| Sonat Tier 1             | 2.00  |
| TCO IPP Pool             | 2.12  |
| Tetco ELa                | 2.01  |
| Tetco M-3                | 2.26  |
| Tetco STX                | 1.92  |
| TGP Zone 0               | 1.92  |
| TGP Zone 1 (500 Leg)     | 1.98  |
| TGT Zone SL              | 2.00  |
| New York Citygate        | 2.27  |
| Transco Station 65       | 2.06  |
| Transco Zone 6 (NY)      | 2.27  |
| Trunk ELa                | 1.99  |
| Western Region
| California Border        | 2.05  |
| El Paso Keystone         | 1.90  |
| El Paso San Juan-Blanco  | 1.91  |
| Waha Hub                 | 1.91  |
| Canadian/Rockies Region
| Nova/Aeco (C$/gig)       | 2.90  |
| Dawn Hub/Union           | 2.12  |
| Northwest Stanfield      | 2.03  |
| Wyoming Pool             | 1.86  |
| Opal                     | 1.86  |
| PGT-Malin                | 2.10  |
| Sumas                    | 2.03  |
        Flow Dates 1/26-28
-------------------------------------------------------------

NATURAL GAS FUTURES
Henry Hub
12 Month Strip ?2.4590 +0.0027 ? ? ?
18 Month Strip ?2.6026 -0.0037? ?
| Month | High  |  Low  | Close | Change |
| FEB   | 2.105 | 1.990 | 2.037 | -0.011 |
| MAR   | 2.900 | 2.050 | 2.104 | +0.014 |
| APR   | 2.200 | 2.135 | 2.180 | +0.014 |
| MAY   | 2.280 | 2.230 | 2.269 | +0.010 |
| JUN   | 2.350 | 2.300 | 2.342 | +0.010 |
| JUL   | 2.420 | 2.390 | 2.414 | +0.006 |
| AUG   | 2.480 | 2.440 | 2.467 | +0.006 |
| SEP   | 2.480 | 2.450 | 2.476 | +0.003 |
| OCT   | 2.510 | 2.475 | 2.503 | -0.002 |
| NOV   | 2.745 | 2.715 | 2.733 | -0.009 |
| DEC   | 2.950 | 2.920 | 2.945 | -0.009 |
| JAN   | 3.050 | 3.010 | 3.038 | -0.010 |
-------------------------------------------------------------
-

RISK MANAGEMENT
Across the Energy Enterprise

e-Acumen, Inc., is uniquely positioned to help you manage risk and
increase value. That's because our analytics, data and applications
cover all strategic aspects of the energy enterprise, from short-term
forecasting to comprehensive risk analysis and portfolio
optimization, to asset valuation and weather risk management.
Dedicated to the needs
of energy and trading companies in a dynamic and competitive world,
our approach combines best-in-class physical fundamentals with
industry-leading statistical methodologies.

e-Acumen is a venture-backed company founded in January, 1997. Since
then we have listened attentively to the market and assembled a
stellar cast of seasoned energy industry professionals and Silicon
Valley technologists. Join us as we help the industry continue its
path toward liquidity and profitable, risk-managed growth in the
exciting years ahead!

Click here to find out more about current special offers, or go to
http://www.e-acumen.com
-------------------------------------------------------------
Natural Gas Futures Dip But Hold Above $2

    Natural gas futures for February delivery on the NYMEX dipped
briefly below $2 per MMBtu Friday, but bounced back on short-covering
and funds rolling to end the day down $0.011 at $2.037 per MMBtu. The
March contract gained $0.014 to $2.104 per MMBtu. The market began
the session lower and gradually works its way higher most of the day,
holding inside only a $0.05 range. Funds continued rolling positions
into March and April contracts and beyond, and marketers braced
themselves for February's expiration tomorrow. Although the market is
making an effort to stay above $2.00, it made a lower high, a lower
low and closed lower for the day and the week. So look for the market
to continue down this week unless colder weather is forecast. Also
expect to see an even smaller withdrawal this week from storage of
about 110 ? 120 Bcf. However, there is a chance for limited short-
covering into expiration as the market continues to be oversold
technically. On Friday, estimated volume was about 90,000 contracts,
with about 40,000 of those spreads or hedge trades. Natural gas for
weekend delivery across the US and Canada was generally $0.05 ? $0.15
lower Friday, Natural gas for weekend delivery at the Henry hub
dropped $0.09 to $2.03 per MMBtu.
-------------------------------------------------------------
 Exploit the enterprise-wide transaction management power deployed by
the
big names in gas.
NUCLEUS Software
ZAINET Gasmaster
The most comprehensive, totally-integrated natural gas information
system
available today.
Ask about out limited-time offer competitive upgrade program.
CAMINUS
Your Competitive Edge in Energy.
Call Caminus at (212)515-3700 or visit the website at
http://www.caminus.com
-------------------------------------------------------------
Today's Power Bulletins
 * Brazil's Parana State Cancels Copel Power Firm Privatization
 * VP Cheney Says He Still Won't Turn Over Energy Papers to GAO
 * Cinergy Declares Quarterly Dividend of $0.25 per Common Share
 * Constellation Energy Group Employees Give Record $2.49 Million to
United Way
 * Exelon Nuclear Reports 94.4% Capacity Factor, Record Generation
 * Senate Energy Committee to Look Into Impact of Enron Demise on
Energy Markets
 * California Consumer Group Slams PG&E Restructure Plan
 * Western Peak Power Prices Increase on Colder Temperatures
 * Most Northeast Power Prices Rise Amid Cooler Weather Forecast
 * Mid-Continent Power Prices Mixed on Weather and Generation
 * Southeast Power Prices Mixed; Mild Weather Cuts Generation
-------------------------------------------------------------
DO YOU JUST SEE TREES? WE SEE A FOREST!
See the forest with NewEnergy MarketPower by efficiently obtaining
information for critical market-based investment decisions and
mitigate your risk.

Use MarketPower to determine the effects of transmission congestion,
fuel costs, generator availability and load growth on market prices
to better execute your company's strategic direction.

Designed specifically for today's energy industry, MarketPower is
accurate and easy-to-use, so you can plan for tomorrow...today!

New Ideas...New Solutions...NewEnergy.
For a free 30-day trial visit us at
http://www.NewEnergyAssoc.com/justdownloadit or call us at 770 779
2957 for more information
-------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Changes Ratings Process

    Standard & Poor's is changing the way it rates companies, in part
because of problems from the demise of Enron. S&P is likely to
conduct more formal reviews of ratings, and will be more specific
about how far a rating may fall in the event of a review for
downgrade. It will also focus more on credit cliff situations, which
could result in a precipitous decline in a company's ratings if
certain events take place. It will require companies to publicize
rating triggers, such as one that in November could have forced Enron
to pay off a $690 million note because of a recent downgrade. S&P is
considering how best to incorporate securities price movements into
ratings. S&P rates companies on a sliding scale from `AAA' to `D'.
Moody's Investors Service and Fitch are also considering changes to
make their own rating activity more timely.
-------------------------------------------------------------
FAST. FLEXIBLE. PROVEN.

The AURORA(TM) electric market model helps you deal with the
challenges and risks of today's energy marketplace.

Exceptionally fast and easy to learn, AURORA(TM) reflects fundamental
market drivers and gives power marketers, resource developers and
portfolio managers a better way to manage against market uncertainty
and price volatility.

AURORA delivers -

?	Price forecasts - hourly, daily, weekly, monthly, yearly
?	On-peak, off-peak pricing
?	Resource valuation and net power costs
?	Portfolio analyses
?	Capacity expansion analyses
?	Effects of emissions
?	And much more . . .

AURORA's comprehensive databases cover all electricity markets
throughout the U.S. and Canada. The model also handles storage,
congestion pricing, and offers detailed reporting and data export
capabilities. It can be used as a stand-alone tool or be integrated
with your other business tools.

Visit us at http://ww.epis.com or call (503) 722-2023.

EPIS, Inc.
Market Information Solutions for the Electric Power Marketplace
-------------------------------------------------------------
Natural Gas NYMEX Volume
02FEB   45,804
02MAR   30,344
02APR    7,368
02MAY    4,797
02JUN    4,358
02JLY    2,387
02AUG    2,501
02SEP      683
02OCT    1,693
02NOV    1,416
02DEC      636
03JAN    2,671
03FEB    1,925
03MAR      821
03APR      137
03MAY       32
03JUN      447
03JLY      406
03AUG      247
03SEP        8
03OCT      135
03NOV       40
03DEC      471
04JAN      121
-------------------------------------------------------------
?????? ?GET REAL about energy risk management with KWI

In today's fast moving energy markets you need to be able to manage
risk in real time.

That means knowing before you hit a risk problem, not afterwards when
it may be too late to prevent big losses spreading right through your
enterprise.

With kW3000(tm), our multi-commodity, integrated front to back office
software, you can monitor your Profit At Risk(tm), counterparty risk
and mark-to-market all in real time.

Keep alert to risk. Do it in real time. Call KWI -Americas: +1-281-
681-3301 / Europe: +44 (0) 20-7386-2700 / Asia Pacific: +61(0) 2-9976-
6111
http://www.kwi.com
--------------------------------------------------------------
Commodity Futures Trading Commission

NYMEX Natural Gas Futures
Reportable Positions as of  1/22/02

Open Interest: 489,390                                  10,000 MMBtu
                                                       Nonreportable

Non-Commercial         |   Commercial |     Total    | Positions
Long | Short| Spreading| Long | Short | Long | Short | Long  | Short
3,286 65,929   43,544  403,415 345,241 450,245 454,714  39,145 34,676

Changes from 1/08/02                 Change in Open Interest:  20,471
 -510  8,913    1,837   30,241  17,767  31,568  28,517   3,060  6,111

Percent of Open Interest for Each Category of Traders
  0.7   13.5      8.9     82.4    70.5   92.0     92.9     8.0    7.1
-------------------------------------------------------------
ENERGY.
@ENERGY(r), FEA's Complete Suite of Energy Products,
BUILT FOR THE FUTURE.

*Manage all your energy risks.
*Build and Price deals.
*Value physical assets (generation, storage, etc.)
*Report and reduce your energy risks

FEA
FINANCIAL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES Inc.
http://www.fea.com/?cId=17
main phone number:? 1 510-548-6200
email address: info@fea.com
-------------------------------------------------------------
PHYSICAL POWER PRICES
|            | High  |  Low  | Average |
|            | $/MWh | $/MWh |  $/MWh  |
| Cinergy    | 18.50 | 17.20 |  17.55  |
| ECAR       | 21.50 | 16.50 |  18.85  |
| ERCOT      | 17.75 | 17.05 |  17.25  |
| Entergy    | 17.50 | 17.00 |  17.25  |
| TVA        | 19.95 | 19.40 |  19.90  |
| ComEd      | 17.75 | 17.00 |  17.35  |
| Nepool     | 28.50 | 27.50 |  28.30  |
| PJM West   | 22.75 | 22.75 |  22.35  |
| Main       | 18.50 | 17.00 |  17.55  |
| MAPP       | 20.00 | 18.50 |  19.15  |
| Palo Verde | 25.75 | 23.50 |  24.70  |
| Mid C      | 22.50 | 21.75 |  22.05  |
| COB        | 24.25 | 23.50 |  23.90  |
| 4 Corners  | 26.00 | 24.75 |  25.45  |
| Mead       | 26.25 | 25.25 |  25.65  |
| NP 15      | 26.25 | 25.00 |  25.65  |
| SP 15      | 27.00 | 25.00 |  26.30  |
-------------------------------------------------------------
Exelon Reduces Net Income on Accounting Error

  Exelon 3rd quarter net income was 6.7% lower than reported in
October because of an accounting error. Net income was $376 million,
or $1.16 per share, not $403 million, or $1.25 per share. That means
Exelon's 3rd quarter profit rose 62% from $232 million, or $1.35 per
share, a year earlier. The company had a bigger than expected loss in
a trust fund that has money for dismantling nuclear generators after
they are closed. The fund is not managed by Exelon. Exelon will
report 4th quarter and 2001 financial results tomorrow. It probably
earned about $4.30 - $4.45 last year.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Allegheny Energy Supply Company, Salt River Project (SRP) and Sempra
Energy
Resources announce Open Season for proposed Desert Crossing Gas
Storage and
Transportation System. Open Season for customers interested in
capacity
begins Jan. 10, 2002 and extends through Feb. 8, 2002.  For
information,
visit http://www.desert-crossing.com
-------------------------------------------------------------
Todays Gas Bulletins
 * Enron Australia Administrators Propose Liquidation
 * White House Orders Enron and Andersen Contracts Review
 * S&P Places Alberta Energy Ratings on CreditWatch with Positive
Implications
 * S&P Places PanCanadian Energy Ratings on CreditWatch with Negative
Implications
 * Baker Hughes Says Rigs Searching for Oil and Natural Gas in US
Fell 10 to 859 Last Week Compared to 1,116 Year Ago; Canada Up 22 to
459 Compared to Year Ago; Gulf of Mexico Down 5 at 117 Compared to
163 Year Ago
 * AFL-CIO Calls on Companies to Refuse Re-Nomination of Enron
Directors to Their Boards
 * NXT Announces Successful Completion of Red River Discovery in
North Dakota
 * Almost All Probing Enron Received Campaign Money
 * ABB Stock Jumps After Halliburton Rally
------------------------------------------------------------
Former Enron Vice Chairman Apparently Commits Suicide

    Former Enron Vice Chairman John Clifford Baxter, who had opposed
the accounting practices that led to the downfall of the energy
trading giant, apparently took his own life early Friday morning.
Police said that Baxter was dead at the scene and the only occupant
of the car. A suicide note and a revolver were found at the scene.
Baxter was chairman and CEO of Enron North America before being named
chief strategy officer. In October of 2000, he was promoted to vice
chairman. Baxter resigned last May after ten years with Enron, during
which time he helped build its wholesale energy business. Baxter had
disagreed with then CEO Jeffrey Skilling over the inappropriateness
of off-balance-sheet transactions involving partnerships that
ultimately brought the company down. Baxter was one of the Enron
directors targeted in about 40 investor lawsuits which allege that
the company concealed losses by the use of the partnerships. Baxter
engineered the $3.21 billion purchase of Portland General Electric in
1997. Enron has agreed to sell the utility to Northwest Natural Gas
for $2.98 billion in cash, stock and debt. Baxter resigned after
losing a battle with Skilling for control of the direction the
company would take. He favored the acquisition of energy producing
assets to build the company, while Skilling preferred to expand the
commodities trading unit, in Enron's asset light theory. Baxter
reportedly told friends that he planned to earn a Ph.D. in history,
spend time with his family and look for a position as chief executive
at another company.
------------------------------------------------------------
 Ziff Energy Group presents
Gas Storage 2002
Redefining the Fundamentals:
Is Gas Still in the Storage Game?
Power Drives Storage
Will the recession affect plant and storage development?
Will record high volumes in storage further depress gas prices?
Is it possible to mitigate storage risk while dealing with year-round
price
volatility?
Plus
Two Important Workshops
Calpine Corporation
Hear what the Power Generator wants from the storage industry
Bruce Bernard
Learn from the expert how to mitigate storage price risk in the 2002
gas
marketplace
February 6 & 7
Houston
Four Season Hotel
1300 Lamar Street
Register Today for this Important Conference
Call 1-800-853-6252

Email: gasconference@ziffenergy.com

Visit: http://www.ziffenergyconferences.com
-------------------------------------------------------------
Dabhol Sale Process Begins This Week

    The bidding process for Enron's $2.9 billion Dabhol Power project
in India is set to begin this week. The Industrial Development Bank
of India said advertisements will be placed in newspapers. Interested
foreign companies are Royal Dutch/Shell, TotalFinaElf and Gaz de
France. Potential Indian buyers are BSES Ltd, Tata Power and Gas
Authority of India. Reportedly Rothschild, DSP Merrill Lynch and
Smifs Securities have been appointed to search for bidders. The vast
2,184 MW natural gas fired power plant and nearby LNG facility, the
largest foreign private investment ever in India, has been idle since
Enron pulled out last June in a dispute over the cost of the power
provided to its only customer, the Maharashtra State Electricity
Board. The 740 MW first phase of Dabhol began operating in May 1999.
A 1,444 MW 2nd phase was almost complete when construction was halted
after the state electricity board fell $240 million behind in
payments for power provided. Those interested in acquiring the plant
must put up a non-refundable $100,000 in earnest money. The sellers
intend to sell the plant as a whole, but bidders may bid jointly for
the operation and split it up later. A London data room will be
established for the commercial and financial agreements, operating
and historical data, projections and information on the status of
Phase II. Due diligence is expected to begin early next month, with a
possible deadline of the middle of March for submitting offers. The
US government's Overseas Private Investment Corporation, a lender and
guarantor of  loans to the project, and IDBI have led the talks among
the parties involved, including 5 Indian financial institutions, 20
foreign banks, 3 foreign government lending agencies, several
governments, equity holders and potential bidders. Enron owns 65% of
the Dabhol project, GE and Bechtel each own 10% and the Maharashtra
State Electricity Board 15%.
-------------------------------------------------------------
R. W. Beck is an engineering and management consulting firm serving
utilities, developers, financiers and governments worldwide.  Founded
in 1942, we help our clients face energy market challenges by
providing:

Portfolio Analysis to improve diversification and risk-adjusted
performance of energy assets.

Risk Control to help reduce the probability of losses.

Asset Valuation to understand the market value and risk
characteristics of physical and financial energy assets.

Training to improve your ability to identify and manage tactical and
strategic risks.

Please visit our web site at http://www.rwbeck.com
-------------------------------------------------------------
POWER FUTURES ?
| Month |   COB   | Change |   PV    | Change |
| FEB   |  21.25  | +0.00  |  22.10  | -0.70  |
| MAR   |  18.50  | +0.00  |  21.75  | -0.75  |
| APR   |  20.00  | +0.00  |  23.25  | -0.75  |
| MAY   |  18.25  | +0.00  |  24.00  | -0.75  |
| JUN   |  20.00  | +0.00  |  28.50  | -0.65  |
| JUL   |  29.50  | +0.00  |  37.75  | -1.00  |
| AUG   |  40.00  | +0.00  |  43.25  | -0.75  |
| SEP   |  34.00  | +0.00  |  32.75  | -0.55  |
| OCT   |  28.00  | +0.00  |  27.75  | -0.25  |
| NOV   |  27.50  | +0.00  |  26.75  | -0.25  |
| DEC   |  28.50  | +0.00  |  27.25  | -0.25  |
| JAN   |  28.50  | +0.00  |  28.25  | +0.00  |
| Month | Entergy | Change | Cinergy | Change |
| FEB   |  18.30  | -0.50  |  19.70  | -0.30  |
| MAR   |  19.40  | +0.65  |  20.80  | -0.20  |
| APR   |  19.40  | +0.65  |  20.80  | -0.30  |
| MAY   |  22.50  | -0.75  |  24.00  | -0.50  |
| JUN   |  26.40  | -0.75  |  28.70  | -1.00  |
| JUL   |  33.25  | -1.00  |  37.25  | -0.75  |
| AUG   |  33.25  | -1.00  |  37.25  | -0.75  |
| SEP   |  26.00  | +4.50  |  22.25  | -0.25  |
| OCT   |  21.35  | -0.40  |  21.90  | -0.20  |
| NOV   |  21.35  | -0.40  |  22.10  | +0.00  |
| DEC   |  21.35  | -0.40  |  22.10  | +0.00  |
| JAN   |  24.00  | -0.25  |  25.00  | -0.25  |
-------------------------------------------------------------
Power Futures
| Month |  PJM  | Change |
| FEB   | 23.75 | -0.25  |
| MAR   | 24.05 | -0.20  |
| APR   | 24.05 | -0.20  |
| MAY   | 26.75 | -0.45  |
| JUN   | 33.00 | -0.50  |
| JUL   | 44.40 | -0.60  |
| AUG   | 44.40 | -0.60  |
| SEP   | 25.30 | +0.05  |
| OCT   | 24.95 | -0.15  |
| NOV   | 24.95 | -0.15  |
| DEC   | 24.95 | -0.15  |
| JAN   | 28.50 | +0.25  |
-------------------------------------------------------------
California PUC Rejects Sempra Settlement

    The California PUC has rejected a settlement proposed by Sempra
Energy that seeks to split profits from power sales between customers
of San Diego Gas and Electric and shareholders. The decision will
likely lead to a lawsuit between Sempra and the PUC. At stake is $363
million the PUC argues could be used to the benefit of customers by
paying down a special balancing account set up during the
California's energy crisis last year that captured the difference
between retail prices state regulators allowed SDG&E to charge and
soaring wholesale power prices. To cash in on the high prices, SDG&E
sold all the electricity remaining on several 5-year power contracts
it had signed in 1996 and 1997, pocketing the profit..
-------------------------------------------------------------
Energy Seminars, Inc. Announces Key Seminar Offerings for January:

Energy Seminars will be going to Florida and Calgary in 2002!

Click to http://www.energyseminars.com to see our 2002 schedule.

Register on-line at http://www.energyseminars.com or call Registrar
Gina Patrick

Phone: 281-362-7979
FAX: 281-296-9922
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------
Alberta Energy and PanCanadian Consider Merger

    PanCanadian Energy Will buy Alberta Energy in a $16.8 billion
share exchange deal which will create North America's largest oil
exploration and production company, replacing Anadarko. The deal will
allow the companies to compete effectively on a global basis. The new
company, which is to be headquartered in Calgary, will be named
EnCana Corp. The exchange ratio is a market-to-market ratio based on
the average of the closing price for the 10 trading days ended
January 23rd. PanCanadian shareholders will own about 54% and AEC
shareholders will own about 46% of EnCana. Combined, the stocks of
the two companies make up 44% of the TSE's oil and gas sub-index.
Some say that Canadian companies have realized the need to bulk up in
order to be competitive with larger companies in the US, like
Anadarko, Burlington Resources and Devon Energy, and to attract
investors. The deal could also be a self-protection measure in
response to last year's rash of takeovers of Canadian oil firms by US
companies, like those that took over Gulf Canada, Anderson
Exploration and Canadian Hunter. Alberta Energy and PanCanadian may
have seen themselves as vulnerable to possible takeovers. PanCanadian
had been considered a possible takeover target when it was spun off
from Canadian Pacific in October. A new AEC-PanCanadian company would
produce 255,000 bpd of oil and natural gas liquids and 2.5 Bcf of
natural gas per day. PanCanadian has natural gas and oil production
facilities in Western Canada and offshore operations in Nova Scotia,
the Gulf of Mexico and North Sea, where it recently discovered the
areas largest oil field in 10 years, named Buzzard. AEC also produces
oil and natural gas in Western Canada, owns about 14% of the Syncrude
Canada oil sands project and has exploration, production, pipeline
and natural gas storage units in the Rocky Mountains, Ecuador and the
Arctic.
-------------------------------------------------------------

???????????Progas Storage and Services, Inc.

Progas can custom build gas storage in the Upper Midwest.

? Design to your specifications
? Close to your markets
? Unregulated storage
? Lower transportation fees
? Lower storage rates

Progas is now accepting proposals and orders for years 2002-2007 for
approxamately 5 bcf of storage on Midwestern system serving Indiana,
Illinois, and 3 bcf on Texas Gas Transmission system serving
Tennessee, northern Kentucky, Indiana, and Ohio.  Additional
potential storage filds beding acquired at this time on Midwestern,
anhandle Eastern and A & R (Coastal) systems serving the Upper
Midwest. Inquiries from potential partners, investment bankers, and
brokers welcome.

Progas Storage and Services, Inc.
8610 South Highway 277
Abilene, TX 79606
Phone: 915-698-3699
Fax: 915-698-2859
Email: gastorage@aol.com
-------------------------------------------------------------
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
The TSE 300 rose 1.70 points to 7659.29
The CRB Index gained 0.81 points to 189.85
The US Dollar increased 1.27 points to 119.85
The Dow advanced 44.01 points to 9840.08
The S&P 500 added 1.13 points to 1133.28
The Nasdaq was down 4.88 points to 1937.70
March NYMEX Crude Oil climbed 0.29 to 19.99
Canadian-US Exchange rose 0.0059 to 1.6079
-------------------------------------------------------------
ENERGY MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE
Higher Education for refined product professionals
NOW ENROLLING RISK MANAGEMENT COURSES: PROFESSIONAL GASOLINE AND
DISTILLATE
MANAGEMENT, PETROLEUM MARKETER, and  ADVANCED GASOLINE AND DISTILLATE
MASTER
LEVEL.
REGISTER NOW, CLASS SIZES ARE LIMITED.
SEE COMPLETE DETAILS CLICK HERE :http://www.energyinstitution.org
-------------------------------------------------------------
Pure Text, Lotus, AOL, Yahoo, Excite, Readers-subscribe by writing to:
enerfax-subscribe@egroups.com

Outlook Email Readers-subscribe to webmail by writing to:
mailto:join-EnerfaxDaily@relay.netatlantic.com
-------------------------------------------------------------
ENERGY MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE
Higher Education for refined product professionals
NOW ENROLLING RISK MANAGEMENT COURSES: PROFESSIONAL GASOLINE AND
DISTILLATE
MANAGEMENT, PETROLEUM MARKETER, and  ADVANCED GASOLINE AND DISTILLATE
MASTER
LEVEL.
REGISTER NOW, CLASS SIZES ARE LIMITED.
SEE COMPLETE DETAILS CLICK HERE: http://www.energyinstitution.org

To view past issues of Enerfax Daily -Sign up for free at  Divine's
Sagewave at
http://www.sagewave.com/D2/autolog/common/log.asp?KEY=enerfax
-------------------------------------------------------------
Please welcome our advertisers by visiting these websites.
http://www.e-acumen.com
http://www.kwi.com/
http://www.fea.com/
http://www.caminus.com/
http://www.progas.net/wip
http://www.ziffenergyconferences.com/
http://www.energyseminars.com
http://www.desert-crossing.com
http://www.epis.com
http://www.rwbeck.com
http://www.NewEnergyAssoc.com

To unsubscribe write enerfax-unsubscribe@egroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


Please see the attached articles:

(editorial)


---------------------- Forwarded by Ami Chokshi/Corp/Enron on 02/22/2000
09:34 AM ---------------------------

"Cynthia Cantrell" <Cynthia.Cantrell@dvn.com> on 02/22/2000 09:11:15 AM
To: <ami.chokshi@enron.com>
cc: "Steve Holmes" <HolmesS.ACCT_MKT.DVNPRI@dvn.com>

Subject: Revised March 2000 Avails

Ami,

Attached are some revised volumes for March, 2000.  Please let me know if I
can provide additional information.

Thanks,

Cynthia

 - EnronAvails0300.xls


Hi Geoff,

I'm really sorry to hear about your father.  I hope that everything is
getting better now after all that terrible thing.  I'll pray for him too.

I'm glad to hear that you already have a daughter.  My youngest son is
slightly older than your daughter.  He is eight-month old.

I'm still doing commodity trading like before, rice, tapioca and yellow
maize.  Now we are also investing on Corn Oil project.

Well, just keep in touch Geoff,  write to me when you have time.

Harry
----- Original Message -----
From: Storey, Geoff <Geoff.Storey@ENRON.com>
To: Hariyono Tan <hariyont@indosat.net.id>
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:37 AM
Subject: RE: Hi!

Hey Harry,

Great to hear from you. I'm alright but in am sorry to say my father was
on the 99th floor of the north tower when the first plane hit. He was
unfortunately one of many that didn't make it out. So the last few weeks
have been difficult. He had funeral services for him on Saturday. Sorry
to drop such terrible news on you.

Yes i am married now and i have a 5 month old baby, Cameron James
Storey. Things were going great before Tuesday. i am woring at Enron as
a natural gas trader and love my job.

let me know what you are doing these days.

geof

-----Original Message-----
From: Hariyono Tan [mailto:hariyont@indosat.net.id]
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 11:01 AM
To: Geoff Storey
Subject: Hi!

Hi Geoff,

How are you doing?  I's been awhile since the last time I wrote.  I'm
just
worried about all my friends in the States after the attack of WTC.  I
just
want to make sure that you are find.

The last time you wrote to me you're engaged already.  Are you married
now,
or maybe you have kids already.

Write me back, ok.

Best regards,
Hariyono

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


thanks for the information - you know us traders always looking for more info.


Jennifer,

I spoke w/Jenny Rub about almost every BMC/EBS issue, except for this one.  I
did not know about the issue which Bruce Smith has sent (blue text, below) to
Jenny and Bob McAuliffe.  When I spoke w/Jenny, I was unaware of BMC's
retraction.  It is new news to me, and at the very least, doesn't seem very
"customer-focused" on BMC's part.  I certainly agree w/Bruce's statement to
the effect that BMC needs to meet w/Philippe about their pricing!

JKY

----- Forwarded by Jeff Youngflesh/NA/Enron on 12/14/2000 04:39 PM -----

	Jenny Rub
	12/14/2000 04:21 PM

		 To: Jeff Youngflesh/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: BMC DEAL --- UPDATE

----- Forwarded by Jenny Rub/Corp/Enron on 12/14/2000 04:21 PM -----

	Bruce Smith/ENRON@enronXgate
	12/14/2000 02:50 PM

		 To: Bob McAuliffe/ENRON@enronXgate, Jenny Rub/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: BMC DEAL --- UPDATE

Not that it matters but wanted you to know:
BMC rep left message recanting the fact that we would still have the 45 %
discount if SAP modules were purchased at some other time.  He states now
that if not purchased now the discount would only be 10-20 % range at a later
date.

Bruce

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Smith, Bruce
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2000 8:35 PM
To: McAuliffe, Bob; Rub, Jenny
Cc: Robinson, Larry
Subject: BMC DEAL
Importance: High

Jenny/Bob

Per the BMC deal, here is where we are with Batch Processing:

TidalSoft, Sysadmiral
Approx.  90 k  ( current quote covers us and GPG and does not include SAP )
We have added a couple of pieces to this and it could bring the cost to 125 k
worst case.  This quote covers consulting and maintenance.  They are trying
very hard to get a deal done this year  and we could probably get our
additional components at the current quote price if we signed.

BMC, Control -M
Approx. 325 k   This is after we remove the SAP modules and components from
the quote. Quote that was sent over from Jeff Youngflesh (Enron GSS) was for
a total of 628 k

Hardware for either product is approx. 300 k.

We have conferred with the SAP team and they are not desperate for us to take
over their scheduling but think it is a good idea to include them in our long
term strategy. They actually do not recommend either of these product's SAP
modules and mentioned a third party product (Autosys) that has connectors
into BMC.  We are not sure at this point about a connector into TidalSoft
(Larry if you have info on this please comment).

Larry's and his team have eval'd both products and although they are leaning
towards Sysadmiral they are satisfied that both products are acceptable.  You
guys make the call as to whether the additional 200 k is worth the weight it
will lend to the EBS/BMC deal.  FYI - BMC rep said that we still get 45%
discount if we cut the SAP modules.  BMC needs to sit down with PB and learn
how over priced their products are !

Let me know what you think.  If we go TidalSoft I need to push this through
or be advised to let it go till the New Year.

Thanks
Bruce

*****
Also in Quote sent over from Youngflesh :
BMC, Control SA
1.3 M     NOT EVALUATED AT THIS TIME  - Is a candidate for future
consideration for the Security Admin space but not enough info to speculate
as to whether to try and leverage current deal with EBS.   I guess they put
this quote together from info they received from Henry Moreno


NEWS

PUC Sidesteps On Who Pays Utilities' Costs / Meanwhile, commision OKs rate
cap for San Diego
David Lazarus, Chronicle Staff Writer

?
09/08/2000
The San Francisco Chronicle

FINAL
A1
(Copyright 2000)
?

?
Amid growing confusion over California's energy future, state regulators
yesterday ducked the politically volatile question of whether utilities such
as PG&E can sock customers with billions of dollars in extra electricity
charges.
The Public Utilities Commission did approve a rate cap for San Diego
electricity customers.
?

But frustrated commissioners hinted they may kick the matter of who pays for
utilities' costs back to the state Legislature, which had been hoping the PUC
would solve the thorny question.
For his part, Gov. Gray Davis suggested yesterday that the issue should stay
with the PUC.
"Everyone is passing the buck," said Mike Boyd, president of Californians for
Renewable Energy, a Sunnyvale nonprofit group. "The Legislature doesn't want
to touch it. The PUC doesn't want to touch it. It's a hot potato."
And the stakes are very high.
As The Chronicle reported yesterday, Pacific Gas and Electric Co. hopes to
hit its customers with all the costs it will accrue under a current rate
freeze -- as much as $15 billion -- when the utility's rates are deregulated
in early 2002.
For its part, San Diego Gas & Electric is estimating that its costs could run
as high as $800 million, and it too wants ratepayers to shoulder the full
burden.
Boyd said California lawmakers and energy regulators ultimately may be forced
to call on the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to weigh in on the
matter.
RELUCTANCE TO PLAY REFEREE
However, the commission's chairman, James Hoecker, said in a telephone
interview from Washington, D.C., that federal authorities would be reluctant
to play referee.
"The recovery of costs could arguably be an issue for us," he said. "But
we're not in the habit of telling states what their laws mean."
That's something state officials themselves are still grappling with.
Amid confusion over whether they even have jurisdiction over such an issue,
the PUC commissioners said their approval of the rate cap in San Diego is
unrelated to whether utilities should be compensated for out-of-pocket
expenses.
The rate cap, as mandated in a bill passed by lawmakers last week, required
the blessing of the commission to take effect.
LAW FUZZY ON COMPENSATION
The governor signed the bill into law on Wednesday. However, the law is fuzzy
about whether the local utility should be compensated for expenses incurred
as a result of the rate cap.
At issue is the difference between what utilities must pay for power in the
turbulent wholesale energy market and the amount they can charge ratepayers.
California's 1996 electricity deregulation bill froze power rates statewide
to stabilize the industry during a transition to a free- market arena.
San Diego was the first city to face the full impact of deregulation when its
rate freeze was lifted last year. Average power bills subsequently doubled,
sparking outrage and protests among ratepayers.
The governor has accused power generators of manipulating prices and gouging
consumers. State and federal authorities are investigating such charges.
By imposing a rate cap yesterday, the PUC effectively brought electricity
deregulation to a halt as lawmakers and regulators struggle to fix the
current system.
"Regulation is coming back because it has to," said Nettie Hoge, executive
director of the Utility Reform Network, a San Francisco consumer group.
RATE CAP RETROACTIVE
In line with the new law, the PUC capped San Diego power rates for
residential customers and small businesses at 6.5 cents per kilowatt- hour,
retroactive to June 1. This means average monthly power bills will be about
$68.
The commission also opened an investigation into the "prudence and
reasonableness" of San Diego Gas & Electric's decision not to secure
long-term wholesale energy contracts. Instead, the utility exposed its
customers to daily swings in energy prices.
"Our basic obligation is to assure the people of California that the rates
they pay for energy are just and fair," said PUC Commissioner Carl Wood.
However, he stressed that yesterday's PUC action did not address the question
of whether utilities should be compensated for deregulation-related expenses
and said the matter should be taken up at a later date.
"We are acting too much in haste," agreed Richard Bilas, a Republican
appointee who seldom sees eye-to-eye with Democratic- appointee Wood on PUC
decisions.
"The most the commission should do is make a recommendation to the
Legislature," Bilas said.
For his part, the governor yesterday moderated the aggressively pro-consumer
stance he has taken in response to the state's energy woes. Asked whether
utilities should be able to place a surcharge on future bills to recover
costs related to deregulation, Davis adopted a more conciliatory tone.
"I do believe utilities should not be left holding the bag for any problems
associated with the 1996 law if they have acted responsibly," he said.
PG&E officials told The Chronicle on Wednesday that the utility is now about
$2 billion in the hole as a result of its rate freeze and that this amount is
rising by nearly $700 million a month.
Sen. Dede Alpert, D-San Diego, one of the authors of the rate-cap
legislation, said that while the question of who should tackle the surcharge
issue remains up in the air, a likely outcome is that both the utilities and
ratepayers will end up shouldering some costs.
"In the end," she said, "consumers are likely to pay some portion of this."

PHOTO; Caption: Gov. Gray Davis said the issue of passing on costs shouldstay
with the state PUC.


We need to start a new "bucket" file called Direct Testimony.  Then please
watch the mail and do a folder for each prepared testimony as they come in.
Thank you!


I have some questions myself about the data contained below, but it is
largely accurate, and for those of you following Europe from afar, I thought
this summary was a convenient way to share with you the status of
developments in Europe.   call if you have any questions.   mcs
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT on 12/12/2000
16:44 ---------------------------

Kyran Hanks
12/12/2000 16:02
To: Paul Turner/LON/ECT@ECT, Bob Manasse/LON/ECT@ECT, John
Oliver/LON/ECT@ECT, Robert Saltiel/LON/ECT@ECT, Ron Bertasi/LON/ECT@ECT,
Stuart G Rexrode/LON/ECT@ECT, Patrick Bastien/LON/ECT@ECT, Kirsten
Wolf/LON/ECT@ECT, David Haworth/LON/ECT@ECT, Patricia Graham/LON/ECT@ECT,
Hala Tayyarah/LON/ECT@ECT, Christoph Waltenspuel/LON/ECT@ECT, Kevin
Greiner/FRA/ECT@ECT, Jackson Vo/HOU/EES@EES, Dung Tran/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT@ECT, Paul Dawson/Govt. Affairs/LON/ECT@ECT, Doug
Wood/LON/ECT@ECT, Sadia Haider/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Country and EU liberalisation summaries

All

Given the number of requests that we have for country summaries, Sadia has
put together these two files.  The first of these files contains for each
country of the EU, for power and gas, a description of each country's
deregulation, and current issues.  I think we will update this every month or
so.

The second file contains some EU wide stuff - maps of liberalisation, the
flags showing liberalisation etc.

Let me know if you need anything else - our next step is to add reported
price data.  These are also on the s:\ees\risk mgt\presentations shared space

Enjoy.

K.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kyran Hanks/LON/ECT on 12/12/2000 15:59
---------------------------

Sadia Haider
07/12/2000 16:43
To: Kyran Hanks/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: country slides


To all who keep responding to this message.....

Please only reply to the original requester!!!  DO NOT HIT REPLY TO ALL!!
You are sending your reply to Enron worldwide.  That means you are sending
your reply to everyone who works for Enron.  Please only reply to the
original sender.

Thanks!
Jonathan Anderson


Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 05/21/2001 07:27 AM -----

	"US Publishing" <brice@restructuringtoday.com>
	05/20/2001 07:44 PM
	Please respond to brice

		 To: "RT Reader" <brice@restructuringtoday.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Restructuring Today, Monday May 21, 2001

(see attached file:  rt010521.pdf)

Thank you,

Season Hawksley
US Publishing
800-486-8201
202-298-8201
 - rt010521.pdf


You weren't too late afterall.  You know I don't mind eating really late.
I'm glad you liked it.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com
To: cameron@perfect.com; Csilva@redsky.com
Sent: 5/18/01 9:15 AM
Subject: Thank You

The dinner was incredibly delicious.  Thank you very much.  I apologize
for
being so late--increasingly I have less and less control over my
schedule.
Would have much preferred to have spent it with you guys.  And sorry
that I
pooped out so early---I'm running on zero sleep and had a 7:30
conference
call this morning.

That said, the dinner was really extraordinary.  You guys outdid
yourself.
Made an others tough day very nice.  Thanks.

Best,
Jeff


I thought we did not like the government of Desert Star (because it's ruled
by the publics and the federal government) and did not like other aspects of
it as much as we liked aspects of RTO West.  Why not wait until we get RTO
West formed and then argue that the rest should be consolidated into it?  If
we try to argue that California should join Desert Star it would be sort of
like the tail wagging the dog and I would be concerned that California would
try to take over.  Besides with RTO West, we have an organization that at
least one Federal Power Marketer has said they could join.

Alan Comnes
01/24/2001 07:40 AM
To: Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: More on the Future of the CAISOChris.H.Foster@enron.com,
Robert.Badeer@enron.com, James.D.Steffes@enron.com

This seems like an idea that you would like ...
---------------------- Forwarded by Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT on 01/24/2001 07:41
AM ---------------------------

Carl Imparato <cfi1@tca-us.com> on 01/22/2001 06:56:14 PM
Please respond to cfi1@tca-us.com
To: Susan.J.Mara@enron.com
cc: Alan.Comnes@enron.com, Chris.H.Foster@enron.com, Robert.Badeer@enron.com,
James.D.Steffes@enron.com

Subject: More on the Future of the CAISO

Sue,

I am amending my previous statement about the 2-year delay in creating a
multi-state RTO.  If FERC were to decertify the CAISO and order the CA
utilities to join a regional RTO, I believe that DSTAR, the California
IOUs and the CAISO infrastructure/staff/systems could easily merge and
be up and running as a large Desert Southwest + California RTO before
the end of the year.  This was basically what I had been trying to
achieve last summer when I was facilitating talks between CAISO and
DSTAR parties about merging the two.

Why not lobby for that as the FERC-preferred solution to the state's
illegal takeover of CAISO governance?

Carl
_______________________

Susan.J.Mara@enron.com wrote:
>
> Carl,
>
> It looks like CDWR is having some problems related to buying Operating
> Reserves.  SHould we worry about what the ISO is doing?
>
> Sue
> ----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 01/23/2001 02:28 PM -----
>
>                     "Katie
>                     Kaplan"              To:     <kaplan@iepa.com>, "Mark
Smith"
>                     <kaplan@iepa.        <Mark.J.Smith@fpl.com>, "Bill
Carlson"
>                     com>                 <wcarlson@wm.com>, "Bill Woods"
>                                          <billw@calpine.com>, "Bob
Escalante"
>                     01/23/2001           <rescalante@riobravo-gm.com>,
"Carolyn Baker"
>                     01:46 PM             <cabaker@duke-energy.com>, "Cody
Carter"
>                     Please               <cody.carter@williams.com>, "Curt
Hatton"
>                     respond to           <curt.hatton@gen.pge.com>, "Dean
Gosselin"


HEY WHAT UP DANA.

-----Original Message-----
From: Davis, Dana [mailto:Dana.Davis@ENRON.com]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 8:59 AM
To: Frank Telemaque
Subject: RE:

You  baby.

-----Original Message-----
From: Frank Telemaque [mailto:Frank_Telemaque@flexitallic.com]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 8:49 AM
To: Davis, Dana
Subject: RE:

what up baby.

-----Original Message-----
From: Davis, Dana [ mailto:Dana.Davis@ENRON.com
<mailto:Dana.Davis@ENRON.com> ]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 8:25 AM
To: Frank Telemaque (E-mail)
Subject:

Good Morning Mr. Man!

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.

**********************************************************************


Got plans for lunch on  Wed. sep. 27th?  I'll be down and eager to chat.  DF


Let's discuss this soon to at least agree on a set of desirable candidates.
Obviously we won't be able to get invitations and accepted invitations within
the next week or two, but we can jointly determine a set of candidates that
are
acceptable.  I leave today for Portland so maybe we can talk on Monday.
Rob

> -----Original Message-----
> From: jdasovic@enron.com [SMTP:jdasovic@enron.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2000 5:07 PM
> To: gramlr@pjm.com
> Subject: RE: APPA
>
>
> Just one thing to keep in mind.  As you can imagine, the agenda and who
> participates is going to factor into our sponsorship.  Sooner we get the
> agenda/participants squared away, the better.
>
> Best,
> Jeff
>
>
>
>
> gramlr@pjm.com on 08/16/2000 01:49:34 PM
>
> To:   jdasovic@enron.com
> cc:
> Subject:  RE: APPA
>
>
> Well if that's your position we're clear.  I had already contacted Columbia
> Energy and APPA and they were both interested so I'll continue to contact a
> couple others.  I think those two offered a total of $5000.  I may get a
> few
> thousand more, but that may all add up to half.  It depends on how long an
> event
> and how many speakers we get.
>
> The Dean is still on vacation but hopefully the school will contact you
> soon.
> Rob
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:   jdasovic@enron.com [SMTP:jdasovic@enron.com]
> > Sent:   Wednesday, August 16, 2000 4:38 PM
> > To:     gramlr@pjm.com
> > Subject:     Re: APPA
> >
> >
> > When's a good time to discuss?  I'd like to get as diverse a group of
> > co-sponsors as possible, and as many as possible.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > gramlr@pjm.com on 08/16/2000 07:00:30 AM
> >
> > To:   jeff.dasovich@enron.com
> > cc:
> > Subject:  APPA
> >
> >
> > Jeff,
> > A GSPP alum at APPA is interesting in co-sponsoring the GSPP forum.  Any
> > objection?  I won't contact others until we discuss Enron's position on
> > co-sponsorship.
> > Rob
> >
> > Rob Gramlich
> > PJM Market Monitoring Unit
> > (610) 666-4291
> > gramlr@pjm.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>


Thanks!
Amy

Holden Salisbury
04/24/2001 09:50 AM
To:	Amy FitzPatrick/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:	Re: Feedback from Tricks of the Trade Training Class

Mine is in your folder.

Thank You

Amy FitzPatrick
04/24/2001 09:06 AM
To:	Heather Dunton/PDX/ECT@ECT, Kourtney Nelson/PDX/ECT@ECT, Bill Williams III/PDX/ECT@ECT, Monika Causholli/PDX/ECT@ECT, Holden Salisbury/PDX/ECT@ECT, Lei Chen/PDX/ECT@ECT, David V Porter/PDX/ECT@ECT, Geir Solberg/PDX/ECT@ECT, Bert Meyers/PDX/ECT@ECT, Julie Sarnowski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject:	Feedback from Tricks of the Trade Training Class

Good morning!

If you have done so already, can you please return your feedback to me ASAP?

Thanks!
Amy

<Embedded StdOleLink>


Jeff, I didn't know about your new job when I saw you before the Azurix
Board meeting. Congratulations!
Hope you have a great time at it.

Happy holidays.

Ed


Have you and Mark ever discussed this?  Have you spoken with Marval?  I'd
really like some more information.  Thanks.  SS

P.S.  Is tomorrow a holdiay in BA?
---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 01/24/2000
09:06 AM ---------------------------

Brent Hendry@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
01/24/2000 06:22 AM
To: John J Shoobridge/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Michael Guerriero/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Andrea
Calo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jeff
Kabel/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Gabriela
Aguilar/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Julian
Poole/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mark Taylor@ECT, Sara
Shackleton@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rodolfo
Freyre/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Federico
Cerisoli/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Re: ISDA Enron Europe

John, I would be very interested to see what the local derivatives market is
developing.  My guess is that the document is probably being prepared for
transactions between two Argentine companies.  If this is the case I would
also like to know what is being done on the tax side by the association to
fix the tax problems caused by doing swaps in Argentina.  If the Argentine
Association of Derivatives has a draft we would like to study it.  Also, are
we going to become a member of this association and are we going to send
someone to the meetings regularly?  Do we have any brochures or other
information regarding the makeup of the association?

From my conversations with Mark Taylor I do not think that ISDA has any plans
to implement a Spanish language ISDA master.  The translation process of the
master, the schedules, and all of the various definition books would be a
serious undertaking (there are literally hundreds of pages of documentation
that would have to be legally translated).  And most US companies that make a
market in derivatives products would not have the legal and back-office
personnel to negotiate and process masters and transactions in Spanish.  I
know that ENA does not have the capacity to do this at the moment.  I think
the only other language ISDA is published in is Japanese and that is a
restricted format used only between two Japanese companies for a limited
number of types of trades specific to the Japanese market.  English will
likely remain the language of choice in international transactions such as
what we are doing now between ENA and Argentine counterparties.  If the tax
situation in Argentina were to change and ESA sets up its own trading entity
in Argentina with front, back and middle offices, then the language issue
could be assessed locally.

I wish there were a simple answer to the current situation.  Please keep me
updated in any local market information you come across.

Thanks,
Brent

John J Shoobridge
23/01/2000 02:01 PM
To: Brent Hendry/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Michael Guerriero/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Andrea
Calo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jeff
Kabel/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Gabriela
Aguilar/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Julian
Poole/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mark Taylor@ECT, Sara
Shackleton@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rodolfo
Freyre/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Federico
Cerisoli/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Re: ISDA Enron Europe

I'm in the need of informing the whole team that Argentina through the
Argentine Association of Derivatives has developed a document that's
circulating in the market and will surely be optimised to the extent that
Argentine companies will use it in the near future if not inmediately. This
document has been prepared by experienced groups of professionals with
foreign support on terms of credit and legal issues.

My impression is that will be competing against that document in a great deal
of disadvantage. This disadvantage will be a "cultural" disadvantage from the
moment that latin american countries tend to have "shorter" documents written
in the local language where the transaction is taking place.
If the ISDA was at least written in Spanish (rather than French or German) it
would be of great help. This is an issue that really "tickles" me: Why isn't
the ISDA document translated into Spanish being that it is after English
probably the language most spoken through out the globe and second that
there's much more opportunity of selling Risk Management Products to Latin
American countries rather than French companies through my more than
disappointing experience in trying to close a deal with French Total.

I believe Sara's visit would be more that important. I'll try to forward
everybody a copy of the document that was drafted in Argentina for
everybody's info.

I strongly believe in the matters of evolution and I'm sure that in the
future ESA's market will mature in such a way that will just like Enron
Europe a document to match market's needs.


Fred / Kay:

I spoke to Duran this morning, and he and I would like to meet together with
us to discuss the Midway project and whether or not we will be able to
utilize TurboPark Phase 2. I previously told him that because of timing
considerations and because there may be certain agreements that will be
difficult to make TurboPark compliant (such as the attached interconnect
agreement from FPL), that Phase 2 may not be practical for purposes of this
project.

I think this would be a good discussion to have on Friday, because we should
have more information on the GE7FAs and should have already spoken with TECO
on their proposed MOU (and maybe even the tolling agreement). What are your
schedules on Friday?

I also would like to schedule a call for tomorrow with TECO to go over the
MOU. Fred - Please coordinate with Kay and schedule something with Becky
Alex. I would prefer the afternoon if that's OK with you guys, and would like
45 min. before the call for us to meet seperately. Also Fred, please advise
on the status of the tolling agreement.

Kay - attached is FPL's standard form interconnect agreement. I was thinking
that Carlos would be a good choice to review it as he is currently working
with accounting / finance on an Ameren interconnect, so he will already be
familiar with the likely issues. Please let me know what you think. It will
be important to give Duran a summary of likely accounting / finance issues
related to this agreement on Friday.

Hope you both had good weekends.

Regards,

Ben
-----Original Message-----
From: Greg Krause
Sent: Mon 5/21/2001 9:00 PM
To: Christi L Nicolay
Cc: Ben Jacoby
Subject: Midway Project - Generic Interconnect Agreement

Please see attached for your review and comments.

 <<FPL Construction & Connection Agreement Generic.doc>>


Rick:

This letter is disingenuous by not mentioning the retail price cap
environment (economists know that price comes from consumer value flowing
backward and not historic "cost" flowing forward in even quasi-competitive
markets) and not mentioning FERC's action on the wholesale natural gas side.

If you want to explore a project where we get a bunch of in-state and
out-of-state economists to sign an open letter arguing for lifting retail
price caps with electricity from which we could make a case for wholesale J&R
rates from demand dampening, I can contact either the Reason Public Policy
Foundation or the Independence Institute in Oakland.  I mention the latter
because they have experience in doing this sort of thing where they publish a
signatory list in the newspapers and all that.  If so, I can look into this
and try to get a price estimate.  If so, who on your team should I work with
on this?

I think a letter from our side could make a good case for what the other side
is calling "just and reasonable" by retail price freedom and open access,
bilateral transaction institutional reform.

- Rob

	Richard Shapiro
	05/29/2001 01:15 PM

		 To: Rob Bradley/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Economists letter on FERC and California

Thoughts?
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron on 05/29/2001
01:14 PM ---------------------------

Susan J Mara
05/29/2001 12:27 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda
Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Economists letter on FERC and California

To Congress.  From what I can tell, at least half of these economists are on
Edison's payroll. Do we need to take any action? Where are the economists on
the other side?

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 05/29/2001 10:24 AM -----

	Peter Bray@NEWPOWER
	05/29/2001 08:56 AM

		 To: susan.j.mara@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Economists letter on FERC and California

FYI
----- Forwarded by Peter Bray/HOU/NewPower on 05/29/01 08:55 AM -----

Attached is a letter signed by 10 prominent energy economists expressing "deep
concern about the failure" of the FERC to address the problems in the
wholesale
power markets.  It is expected that new Senate Energy Committee Chairman,
Jeff Bingaman,
will exercise considerable Congressional Oversight Authority to pressure
FERC to act to remedy wholesale prices.

Late Friday evening, the two new FERC Commissioners were confirmed by the
full Senate.

 - FINALECONOMISTLETTER.pdf


Thanks for the list.  One clarification:  What do you mean by the sentence starting "How challenged are we really . . ."

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Sherriff, John
Sent:	Tuesday, August 21, 2001 1:34 AM
To:	Kean, Steven J.
Subject:	Management Committee Meeting

Steve

Here are a few thoughts on the management committee meeting at the Woodlands:

I would stay away from a general reporting on what is happening if at all possible - and focus
on a few things we really need to work on as well as a few things we should remind ourselves
are going quite well.  If we only focus on the problems I fear the group will walk away a bit
demoralized.

Second - I think we should move to many things getting driven by subcommittees of the
Management committee.  And then the recommendations sometimes being approved
by the Management committee.

Here are a few subjects that we should touch on and initiate debate but not try and
solve - get them started and turn over to a subcommittee:
PRC process
Diversity
Giving the right signal to our business about the value and cost of capital
What new businesses do we have going?
Is now the right time for Xcelerator?
More detailed external financial reporting
How do we describe ourselves to the outside world and inside world?  What messages
  do we want to modify?
What are the characteristics where our business model works and doesn't work?
How well is our RAC process really working?
We are a business where our biggest cost is people and that cost has blown out
  during the last few years - do we need to think about our biggest cost any
  differently than we did five years ago?
How challenged are we really in getting substantial credit for Enron now that it
our credit spreads.
Enron's normal new business mindset has been to overwhelm an opportunity - EBS, EES,
power.  When this works it really pays off but in today's financial markets is a more conservative
approach warranted?

Anyway those are just a few ideas.  One of the things we might do tomorrow is solicit
ideas from the entire committee (in writing) and work on those items of most interest.

John


Hi Liz -

Your Dad said to tell you that it would be fine for Elizabeth to review the
document.  Her secretary told me that her e-mail address is:
elabano@enron.com.  I'm copying her on this in case you have any difficulty
with sending it.

Rosie

Elizabeth Lay <lizard_ar@yahoo.com> on 02/09/2000 12:52:35 PM
To: Ken Lay <klay@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Legal Assistance

Dad,
I've drafted a Interim Construction Financing document
for the loan we previously discussed. However, I would
like to have it reviewed by Elizabeth Labonowski
(assuming she has handled some of your loans and real
estate interests previously) if you don't mind.
Unfortunately, since my contract experience is
generally in Take or Pay or join venture projects, it
is lengthier than you wanted.
Please let me know if I can have the go ahead to
contact Elizabeth and if you could have Rosalee send
me Elizabeth's e-mail address, that would be very
helpful.
Thanks,
Love,
Elizabeth
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com


Stacy - These deals have been flipped out.

Errol

Stacey Vallejo@ECT
02/02/2001 11:34 AM
To: Sherry Dawson/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Duke Energy Marketing deals to be flipped to P& book

Hey Sherry,

Here is the spreadsheet with the Duke Energy Marketing deals that I need you
to flip to the FT-US/CAND-ERMS book as soon as possible.  I need to get an
invoice to them within the next few hours as they need to settle with us on
Monday.

If you could go through your book and flip any deals between ENA and Duke
Energy Marketing LP to the P& book to settle with ECC that would help solve
some problems.  Please let me know if you have any questions on this.  Just
to let you know, Carole Frank took notes this morning when I walked her
through running that download in TAGG.  It can be done for any counterparty
in any book, so you can also run it for Duke Energy Marketing LP as well.

Thanks
Stacey


From Rick Walker

_________________________________________________

Sue Ford - Executive Assistant
Enron Industrial Market - Office of the Chairman
Tel: 713-853-5176
Fax: 713-646-5930
sue.ford@enron.com

-----Original Message-----
From: 	GEORGE.SERICE@jpmorgan.com [mailto:GEORGE.SERICE@jpmorgan.com]
Sent:	Thursday, November 01, 2001 9:26 AM
Cc:	Donald.McCree@jpmorgan.com; GREG.NELSON@jpmorgan.com; Richard.S.Walker@jpmorgan.com; Christopher.Teague@jpmorgan.com; PATRICIA.CAFFREY@jpmorgan.com; TOD.BENTON@jpmorgan.com; Cynthia.Ogden@jpmorgan.com; Michael.GSF.Buckley@jpmorgan.com; Michael.GSF.McGovern@jpmorgan.com; chris.lyons@citi.com; Roxanne.Powell@chase.com; Ford, Sue
Subject:	Enron Press Release / Bank Script Conference Call (version 2)

Version 2 of bank script.  Sue, please print for Lyons and Walker.
(See attached file: Enron Script2- November 1.doc)


What kind of contract?

	William Gang@EES
	02/28/2001 06:32 PM

		 To: Charles Thompson/HOU/EES@EES
		 cc: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Lead Time

Think the 6-8 months is baloney.  Can you verify?

Bill
---------------------- Forwarded by William Gang/HOU/EES on 02/28/2001 04:31
PM ---------------------------

Weaver Paul Civ 95 CEG/CEOEE <Leo.Weaver@edwards.af.mil> on 02/28/2001
10:40:36 AM
To: "'William_gang@enron.com'" <William_gang@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Lead Time

Bill,
Info...in recent talks SCE ventured the opinion that based on thier alleged
experience it would take 6 or 8 months to get a new contract cycled thru the
CPUC for approval and implementation.  If this is true (which I doubt) it
could impact on the operational capability of our PDA which expires in 7
months.  Do you folks agree it could not happen quicker.  If need be, do you
know any strategy for getting thru that process quicker?
Paul


yes, too busy.  very disappointed that i didn't get to see everyone.  hope
all is well.

Xi Xi@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS

09/15/2000 06:02 PM

To: Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: EBS global update - licensing efforts

I was wondering why you didn't show up for the DC conference? very busy ??
hm...
I

	Jeff Dasovich@EES
	09/15/00 05:59 PM

		 To: Xi Xi/Enron Communications@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: EBS global update - licensing efforts

Hi.  How's things?  Long time no see.


FYI
Thanks
Gary

-----Original Message-----
From: Alan.Comnes@enron.com [mailto:Alan.Comnes@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 10:52 AM
To: Joe.Hartsoe@enron.com; Susan.J.Mara@enron.com;
Steve.C.Hall@enron.com; Christian.Yoder@enron.com; gfergus@brobeck.com;
rcarroll@bracepatt.com; Paul.Kaufman@enron.com;
James.D.Steffes@enron.com; Mary.Hain@enron.com; ray.alvarez@enron.com;
Chris.H.Foster@enron.com; Lester.Rawson@enron.com;
Bill.Williams.III@enron.com; Greg.Wolfe@enron.com
Cc: Tim.Belden@enron.com; Jeff.Richter@enron.com
Subject: The other shoe dropped: accepted bid and cost data for all EPMI
transactions with PX/ISO Oct - Nov

Y'all:

FERC has requested (see attached letter) data similar to the data we have
been ordered to provide beginning 1/1/01 but for the refund period that
began on 10/1/01 (i.e., they need data for the front end of the refund
period: Oct-Dec). December is due March 30.  October and November due April
6. I am working with commercial attornies (Steve C Hall) and with traders
(Jeff Richter and others) to prepare a report.

We are ascertaining whether we can meet the March 30 deadline and may need
to request an extension.

An open question is the extent to which we need to submit transactions for
pricetaker bids.  Since Jan 1 we have only reported transactions where the
bid was above the $150/MWh breakpoint.  Using that criterion, we had no
transactions to report. There is also an open issue of how we report costs
since we are not generators.

Alan Comnes
-----------------------------------------------------------
(See attached file: 17-985286189.XIF)

=======================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of
the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to
postmaster@brobeck.com
BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP
http://www.brobeck.com

 - 17-985286189.XIF


Innovative is a euphemism for something,  but I can't figure out the right
word.  What every means "Company Most Likely to Exhaust its Lawyers with
Impossible Structures and Processes"....

ckm
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 02/06/2001 03:55
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Ken Lay and Jeff Skilling                           02/06/2001 03:52 PM

Sent by: Ken Lay and Jeff Skilling
To: All Enron Worldwide
cc:

Subject: Most Innovative -- Six Years Straight

We've done it again, everyone.   Enron has been named the "Most Innovative
Company in America" for the sixth consecutive year by Fortune.  That's right
-- six years in a row.   We continue to be recognized by our industry peers
and other corporate executives and securities analysts as the company that
sets the standard for doing business in the new economy.  Congratulations to
all of you for making it happen.

Enron placed No. 18 overall on Fortune's list of the nation's 535 "Most
Admired Companies," up from No. 36 last year.  We also were ranked among the
top five in "Quality of Management," "Quality of Products/Services" and
"Employee Talent."

This issue of Fortune is now available in airports and will be on newsstands
Monday, Feb. 12.  For more information, go to www.fortune.com.


Could be me, but that doesn't look like your email address.  You get this
email from Jeremy (good guy who works with Steve)?
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 10/11/2000 05:01 PM -----

	Jeremy Meier <jermeier@earthlink.net>
	10/11/2000 03:54 PM

		 To: Sue_Nord@EES.enron.net
		 cc: jdasovic@enron.com
		 Subject: Enron California Template

Sue:

To follow up from yesterdays' call with us, we are going to revise the
California ETI tariff(s) to parallel your national Enron template.  We are
also looking at Pacific Bell's Tariff CAL. PUC No. 175T to determine their
current Dedicated Transport service tariffed rates, and will advise.
We have a PDF version of the Master Sales Agreement, and are incorporating
some minor revisions - and maintaining the Contract as governing over the
tariff.  I believe we also needed input from Enron Broadband Sales on the
California customer Forms for filing with the updated tariffs.
If you could pass along the template so we can change the services, that
would be greatly appreciated.  Please let us know any questions,
Jeremy Meier
Blumenfeld & Cohen
4 Embarcadero Center, Suite 1170
San Francisco, CA 94111
415 394-7500


Karen,

I don't run across many people without email these days. Big hassle.  It is
so much easier to check for certain issues with an electronic copy.

I'm looking for the Fehr option, but the latest I have on my computer is the
version I emailed to you on August 30th.  Is there a more up-to-date version,
and if so, could you please mail it to me?

Thanks,

Kay

"Way, Karen S. - CHI" <karen.way@piperrudnick.com> on 09/18/2000 02:28:53 PM
To: "'Kay.Mann@enron.com'" <Kay.Mann@enron.com>, "Gershon, Mark A. - CHI"
<Mark.Gershon@piperrudnick.com>
cc:

Subject: RE: Yorkville Annexation Agreement

Kay:
The Village's attorney drafted the agreement and therefore we do not have an
electronic version -- unfortunately, he does not have email either.  The
redlined version you are reviewing now reflects only minor changes from that
originally executed by ENA approximately a month ago.  Please let me know if
I can be of any assistance.  Thanks!

Karen S. Way
Piper Marbury Rudnick & Wolfe
203 N. LaSalle
Chicago, Illinois 60601
email:  karen.way@piperrudnick.com
(ph) 312-368-2152
(fax) 312-630-6347

> -----Original Message-----
> From:   Kay.Mann@enron.com [SMTP:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
> Sent:   Monday, September 18, 2000 2:16 PM
> To:   Way, Karen S. - CHI
> Subject:   RE: Yorkville Annexation Agreement
>
>
> I'm looking at it right now.  Could you please email it to me?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Kay
____________________________________________________________________________
The e-mail address and domain name of the sender changed on November 1,
1999.  Please update your records.

The information contained in this communication may be confidential, is
intended only for the use of the recipient named above, and may be legally
privileged.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this
communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please re-send this communication to
the sender and delete the original message and any copy of it from your
computer system.
Thank you.

For more information about Piper Marbury Rudnick & Wolfe, please visit us at
http://www.piperrudnick.com/
____________________________________________________________________________


Attached is a updated memo about transition issues.

This is not a all inclusive memo but a starting point.

Please sent comments to me and I will update and redistribute.

thanks

bob


Thanks for your note.  I am stranded in London and won't be able to get back until they start international flights again and I can get a seat.  Looks like that means Sunday afternoon at the earliest so please light a candle for me, too on Friday night.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Veronica Brock" <veronica_brock@hotmail.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Veronica+20Brock+22+20+3Cveronica+5Fbrock+40hotmail+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Thursday, September 13, 2001 5:02 PM
To:	kcommercial@aol.com; cmckeish@hotmail.com; aquarius80817@yahoo.com; george.pinkowski@fritz.com; hmclaren27@aol.com; gannie58@hotmail.com; john.lopez@fritz.com; joseph.fenner@chrobinson.com; MICLOS6@prodigy.net; Taylor, Mark E (Legal); michael.sevey@fritz.com; nicole744@hotmail.com; dispatch@gulfwindsintl.com; fossasrafael@yahoo.com; robin.smith@chrobinson.com; stephendubois@ev1.net; taffy.milligan@enron.com; tsr@flash.net; tgslawref@ev1.net; ttoecmia@aol.com; trevor@natco-1.com; stone@centex.net
Subject:	Fwd: FW: Sounds like a great Idea to me!!!!!!!!!!!!!

From: "LaKiffanie Jackson" <lpj75@hotmail.com>
To: PANSYLAW@HOTMAIL.COM, VERONICA_BROCK@HOTMAIL.COM, GANNIE58@HOTMAIL.COM
CC: jackiesmith51@aol.com
Subject: Fwd: FW: Sounds like a great Idea to me!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 10:20:44 -0500

>From: "JACKSON, SHANTA L (SBCSI)" <sj1917@sbc.com>
>To: keny40@msn.com, lpj75@hotmail.com, claysh@hotmail.com,
>sylvia_lett@argodata.com, "ELLIS, DEBBIE L (SWBT)"  <de1947@sbc.com>,
>"JACKSON, VIRGINIA (SBCSI)"  <vj2857@sbc.com>,
>SharonMcNeal@texashealth.org, "GONZALES, BARBARA (SBCSI)" <bg0928@sbc.com>,
>   "Law, Pansy (SWBYP)"  <pc6908@sbc.com>,   "REEVES, TANYA R (SWBT)"
><tr9636@sbc.com>, v.j.turner@prodigy.net,   bige1will@aol.com
>Subject: FW: Sounds like a great Idea to me!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 09:42:05 -0500
>
>
>
>
>Friday Night (September 14th) at 7:00 p.m. step out your door, stop your
>car, or step out of your establishment and light a candle. We will show the
>world that Americans are as strong and united together against terrorism.
>
>Please pass this to everyone on your e-mail list. We need to reach everyone
>across the United States quickly.  The message: WE STAND UNITED - WE WILL
>NOT TOLERATE TERRORISM!  Thank you.
>
>We need press to cover this-we need the word to see.
>

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp


John - In case you need this right away, I've made a few changes below and
this is probably adequate.  If you have a little more time, I can polish it
up a bit tomorrow.  Just let me know.

	John Peyton
	08/14/2000 04:30 PM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Keith MacIvor/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Chris Hilgert/HOU/ECT@ect
		 Subject: Please review attached language and return asap

Dear Mark,

Please review the attached language that I have drafted that I would like to
include with a single or several spreadsheets that I hope to email to several
prospective dayrate financial customers.

"This spreadsheet (or any portion of this spreadsheet) is for your company's
private use and may not be disclosed to any other entity (including
affiliates) without the prior written consent of Enron North America.  This
spreadsheet is provided as is and without warranties of accuracy or fitness
for a particular purpose or any other warranty of any kind, all of which are
expressly disclaimed.  None of the spreadsheet's calculations can be
represented as accurate; they are being provided herein as indicative and for
discussion purposes only.  The providing of this spreadsheet does not serve
to place ENA in a fiduciary or  financial advisor's role; you should evaluate
and understand the terms, conditions, and risks of all financial dayrate
transactions before making your decisions with respect thereto.  Any
associated transaction(s) are also subject to negotiation of mutually
acceptable definitive agreements, satisfactory credit arrangements and the
approval of the respective management's of our two companies. This
spreadsheet is not intended to create a binding or enforceable contract nor
is it an offer or a commitment to enter into any transaction."

Thanks,

John


Joe - per our conversation this morning, I talked to Sean Boyle @Duke (713)989-0794.  He believes they are still looking to fill the position.  I talked to him about you and to expect your call. He sez "no problem".

Good Luck

cmm


Yup, he's 3 and SO big now.  He's talking like crazy and says the funniest
shit.  He's getting to be pretty ornery though...  Go figure!

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark.Guzman@enron.com [mailto:Mark.Guzman@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, February 02, 2001 10:48 AM
To: Katie.Trullinger@wfsg.com
Subject: RE: Yo

Not much here I have to work Saturday and Sunday dayshifts, which kind of
sucks however, I am usually ok to go out until like 10-11 on nights like
that as Saturdays are not too busy.  Is Bailey 3 now?


Please disregard the request for the Enron Credit documentation in the name
of NBR Default Swap and Tranocean Sedco Rig. All others are still outstanding
items.

Thanks again!

JAG
---------------------- Forwarded by Jorge A Garcia/NA/Enron on 09/19/2000
09:45 AM ---------------------------

Jorge A Garcia
09/19/2000 09:43 AM
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Laurel Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Convertible & Credit Trades

Sara,

Please see the attached spreadsheet of the Convertible and Credit Trades in
the name of ECT Investments. We are making an effort to complete our working
files. Please provide us with a copy of the documentation file for the
referenced assets highlighted in green.

Feel free to call or e-mail me and I will be happy to swing by and pick them
up.

Thanks in advance!

Jorge A. Garcia
Manager- Risk Management
ENA
(713) 853-5596


Start Date: 1/6/02; HourAhead hour: 14;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  Variances detected.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002010614.txt

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 14 / Preferred: 401.05 / Final: 401.02)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: SCE1
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 1/6/02
  SC_ID: ENRJ


Can we do a 10am CDT, 8am PDT call?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Wednesday, August 22, 2001 5:52 PM
To:	Tribolet, Michael; Neustaedter, Robert
Cc:	Steffes, James D.; Thome, Jennifer; Kingerski, Harry
Subject:	RE: California Rate Exposure

Michael:

Thanks very much for your help on this.  Can we discuss first thing in the AM after all have had a chance to review?

Best,
Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tribolet, Michael
Sent:	Wednesday, August 22, 2001 5:20 PM
To:	Neustaedter, Robert
Cc:	Dasovich, Jeff; Steffes, James D.; Thome, Jennifer; Kingerski, Harry
Subject:	RE: California Rate Exposure

All:

I changed the following:

1. Reduced total load from 185,000 GWh to 178,000 GWh.
2. Allocated the "costs" by utility based on total demand
3. Changed the DWR negative MTM on contracts from $7.5B to $9.55B
4. Added an undercollection of $.932 Billion for SDG&E (more below)

I did not:

1. Add the Nuclear decommissioning as it is funded on balance sheet.

I added the following:

1. Allocated the Bonds and Contracts on DWR share of Revenue Requirement %.
2. The CTC is the softest assumption.   The utilities wrote off considerable Transition Revenue Account (undercollection) and Transition Cost Balancing Account Balance (primarily stranded cost) at year end.  The Regulatory Asset for PG&E and Edison is assumed to be primarily TCBA at 6-30-01, but there is no footnote to absolutely corroborate this.   The Undercollection for SDG&E is assumed at the Regulatory Asset balance at 6-30-01.   This is due to the rate freeze having ended for SDG&E and therefore their TCBA should be recovered (reduced to zero).

Results:

One of the key driver to the utility-by-utility allocation is the difference between total volume and share of DWR costs.   DWR allocated costs to have a uniform "rate" across the net short by utility.   Thus those with a larger portion of their total demand (SDG&E and to a lesser extent PG&E) which is covered by DWR, have a higher unit cost across all rates for the Bonds and Contracts.  Edison has the converse.

Any changes in assumptions are welcomed.

Regards,

Michael

 << File: m010822.xls >>

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Neustaedter, Robert
Sent:	Tuesday, August 21, 2001 5:28 PM
To:	Tribolet, Michael
Cc:	Dasovich, Jeff; Steffes, James D.; Thome, Jennifer
Subject:	California Rate Exposure

Michael,

Jim has asked Jennifer and me to estimate the potential exposure (worst case) to the Company's book position for DA customers in California.  Starting from the  model you and Jeff developed we have added other possible categories of charges allowed by existing regulations.

We would appreciate if you could please review the attached and provide us with any feedback.  If available we would like to call you Wednesday morning to discuss.

 << File: direct access.xls >>


As we work to turn the company around, interim CEO Steve Cooper is quickly becoming a credible advocate for our restructuring.  This week, Steve participated in a number of media interviews with print and wire service reporters.  Below are links to the stories resulting from those interviews.

FINANCIAL TIMES:  Enron chief considers law suits to recover cash
http://home.enron.com/updates/articles/lawsuits.html

AP ONLINE:  New Enron CEO Cooper Sees Rebirth
http://home.enron.com/updates/articles/notimpossible.html

CP WIRE:  Enron can be salvaged: CEO Collapsed company faces hurdles
http://home.enron.com/updates/articles/salvaged.html

THE WASHINGTON POST:  Cooper's Crash Course; In Enron, the Turnaround Expert Faces His Biggest Challenge
http://home.enron.com/updates/articles/crashcourse.html

REUTERS:  Enron's top execs to stay on post Ch. 11-CEO.
http://home.enron.com/updates/articles/execsstay.html

DOW JONES NEWS SERVICE:  Enron Interim CEO: Still Interviewing Auditors
http://home.enron.com/updates/articles/auditors.html

HOUSTON CHRONICLE:  Enron utility sale could be canceled
http://home.enron.com/updates/articles/utilitysale.html

CBSMARKETWATCH:  Interim CEO Cooper expects a return to regulated roots
http://home.enron.com/updates/articles/roots.hth


Enron Methanol nominates the following natural gas requirements for the
Methanol Plant for June 2000:

36,000 mmbtu per day

EGPFC nominates the following natural gas requirements for the MTBE Plant at
Morgan's Point for June 2000:

9,000 mmbtu per day


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Keavey, Peter F.
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 3:05 PM
To:	Dowjones1 (E-mail); Dowjones2 (E-mail); Gas Daily (E-mail); Iferc1 (E-mail); Iferc2 (E-mail); NGI (E-mail)
Subject:


GADSDEN RESEARCH SERVICES'
FERCwatch
 Issued October 17, 2001

ELECTRIC / HYDRO Report:

Midwest Independent System Operator, Inc. and American Transmission Company LLC, ER02-78-000 (10/11/01) -- ATCLLC's Open Access Transmission Tariff rate schedules that have been redesignated with the Midwst ISO tariff designations for inclusion in the Midwest ISO OATT.
_______________________________________

Niagara Mohawk Holdings, Inc. and Select Energy, Inc., EC02-4-000 (10/12/01) -- Section 203 filing for approval of Select's acquisition of all the common stock of Niagara Mohawk Energy Marketing, Inc. and the resulting indirect change of control of the jurisdictional facilities of NCEM.
_______________________________________

Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corporation and Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLC, EC02-5-000 (10/12/01) -- Section 203 filing requesting authorization for VYNPC to divest, and for Entergy Nuclear VY to acquire, the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station and associated jurisdictional assets, includibng appurtenant interconnection facilities.
_______________________________________

NATURAL GAS / OIL Report:

NO REPORT
_______________________________________

[To request a copy of any of the above listed  filings, please call 202-210-4771 or toll-free, 1-877-544-4771; or send an e-mail to grs4ferc@starpower.net <mailto:grs4ferc@starpower.net>)]

GRS' FERCwatch e-mail notification is a free courtesy service of Gadsden Research Services, energy research and document retrieval specialists.  Periodically (generally once or twice weekly), GRS will broadcast FERCwatch with descriptions of major FERC issuances or filings such as rulemakings, policy statements, mergers, new rate filings, major rate changes, and certificate filings.

GRS can provide hardcopies of any of the above listed items at nominal charges; for document requests or estimates of charges, please reply to grs4ferc@starpower.net <mailto:grs4ferc@starpower.net> or call 202.210.4771 (toll free, 1.877.544.4771).

For an e-mailed copy of a brochure of GRS services and rates for FERC and other federal agency research please e-mail your request to grs4ferc@starpower.net <mailto:grs4ferc@starpower.net>.  For a mailed copy, please include your name, firm name and street address.  For a faxed copy, please include your fax number.

The FERCwatch subscription list is used for the sole purpose of providing information on FERC and energy industry activity and will not be sold or otherwise distributed to any other business or organization.  For additions or removal from the FERCwatch notification list, please reply to grs4ferc@starpower.net <mailto:grs4ferc@starpower.net>.

Send suggestions on how the GRS' FERCwatch can better serve the energy community to grs4ferc@starpower.net <mailto:grs4ferc@starpower.net>.


Travelocity.com logo 	 [IMAGE]Fare Sale [IMAGE]

 Home  	 Flights  	 Lodging  	 Cars/Rail  	 Vacations  	 Cruises  	 Deals/Rewards

name=maintabs>

[IMAGE]	Dear Susan,   Your chance to save big  with the Delta 30%-off sale ends on Wednesday March 20.  I'd hate for you to miss out on this great opportunity. Even if you currently don't have Spring travel plans, you might want to check out the opportunities below.  We've paired up great Delta fares with some of our best hotel buys!  More details and to book: http://svc.travelocity.com/promos/3day_dl_tvly/0,,,00.html  Sample Round-trip Fares From Your Area To:  Las Vegas, NV   $254.60 Miami, FL   $169.09 New Orleans, LA   $169.09 San Francisco, CA   $254.60  Save up to 70% with these Travelocity GoodBuy Hotels :  Excalibur Hotel and Casino   $65.95 Shelly Hotel   $79.95 Ramada Plaza Garden District   $99.95 Holiday Inn Civic Center   $85.95  I hope you have the chance to take advantage of these great deals from Travelocity and Delta Airlines . Hurry!  The Delta Sale expires Wednesday, March 20.    Happy Travels!  Chris Monroe www.travelocity.com  1-888-TRAVELOCITY (872-8356)  	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]Add A Car  [IMAGE]Add A Hotel  [IMAGE]Customer Service  [IMAGE]Guides & Advice     Spring Sale  	[IMAGE]

name=fares>

[IMAGE]	  EARN FREE TRAVEL. NO RESTRICTIONS.  Apply for the Travelocity World MasterCard  and earn points towards free travel!   SAVE $75 ON AIRFARE  Interested in saving even more on airfare? You'll receive $75 in cash rebates on airline tickets and many other travel benefits when you join the Travelocity Preferred Member  Program today.  Fares shown are for one adult and are subject to additional charges, including, but not limited to, Passenger Facility Charges (ranging from $2-$18), Federal Segment Fees of $3.00 per segment (defined as a takeoff and a landing), September 11th Security Fee (maximum of $5 one way or $10 round trip), and taxes/fees associated with international itineraries up to $113. Fuel surcharges, if applicable, are included in the fares listed.  Total fare per passenger, including all charges, will always be displayed to you prior to final ticket purchase. Please note that fares are subject to restrictions, may not be available on all flights, and may change without notice. For detailed descriptions of the fare rules, click on the corresponding rules link. 	[IMAGE]

name=headline>
	        CUSTOMER SERVICE   UNSUBSCRIBE     HOW DO I UPDATE MY E-MAIL?    FORGOT YOUR PASSWORD?    0  When you registered at Travelocity or Preview Travel, you agreed to receive e-mail. If you would like to change your subscription preferences or if you received this message in error, please click here .    [IMAGE]  You may update your e-mail address within Your Account Preferences. Simply go to the Travelocity reservations page, log in, and select the Your Account  area.   [IMAGE]  Travelocity's online Customer Service  can help you remember it. Just enter your User ID and your e-mail address, and if it matches our files, we will e-mail your password to you.   [IMAGE]      Sabre Connected  Travelocity and Travelocity.com are trademarks of Travelocity.com LP and Sabre is a trademark of an affiliate of Sabre Inc. 2002 Travelocity.com LP. All rights reserved. #240 CST#2050374-40


meeting will be held in Wes's office #3305


You've gone out of your way for them, and  I think it would be a nice touch
to send you a goodie!

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	06/07/2001 03:18 PM

		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Jacoby

At the very least, the cancellation charges are theirs.

From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 06/07/2001 03:14 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Jacoby

Exactly what I told Lorie (send her a gift certificate for a manicure and
pedicure), but she kind of balked.  I'm not sure of her taste.  It'll be
interesting to see what they send you.  Let me know.

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	06/07/2001 03:07 PM

		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Jacoby

Works for me.  We are leaving to check in to the hotel, then back.  I had to
cancel manicure/pedicure ( and charged for it)  A hint that a gift
certificate for same would work might be appropriate.

From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 06/07/2001 02:56 PM
To: kay.mann@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Jacoby

Jacoby's assistant just called and wanted your home address.  Apparently Ben
is going to send you something or someone (manicurist/pedicurist) to your
home.  I told her you liked champagne too if he wanted to get you a beverage
and also that you would be leaving to go celebrate your daughter's birthday a
little later this afternoon.  I didn't want them sending out someone and you
not be there.  I can see you now with the phone in one hand and a manicurist
on the other or better yet, a glass of bubbly!


Williston Basin Pipeline and storage fields and Montana Dakota Utilities are both owned by MDU Reources Group, Inc. (NYSE: MDU).  Website www.mduresources.com.  The pipeline website is www.wbip.com.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tycholiz, Barry
Sent:	Thursday, September 13, 2001 2:21 PM
To:	Whitt, Mark
Subject:	RE: WBI

Who owns Williston Basin, the storage field, the utility.

BT

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Whitt, Mark
Sent:	Thursday, September 13, 2001 3:19 PM
To:	Tycholiz, Barry
Subject:	RE: WBI

When you say ownership grid what are you reffering to?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tycholiz, Barry
Sent:	Thursday, September 13, 2001 2:18 PM
To:	Whitt, Mark
Subject:	WBI

Can you include in your summary, what the ownership grid looks like for WBI.. who are the players. etc.

John stopped by and we will schedulea meeting with him for friday afternoon.

BT


---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 12/28/99 10:00 AM
---------------------------

	From:  William Kelly                           12/28/99 09:53 AM

To: D Todd Hall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank L
Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kristin Albrecht/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jackie Nelson/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jennifer deBoisblanc Denny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Friedman/HOU/ECT@ECT, James Simpson/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Oliver/HOU/ECT, Eric
Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda F Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kenneth W
Walther/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jay Reitmeyer/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: CD Burner - REVISION

I just received a directive to obtain a list of the name of each file that is
saved to a disk.  For example:

H / Gas Risk / Firm Trading / Spreadsheet / Y2K
H / Gas Risk / Firm Trading / West / Gas Daily Deals
H / Gas Risk / Firm Trading / East / Basis Curves

etc .....

Please provide this list to us when you come to 3084 to save your files.

Thanks!

WK


All,

I have found that most of Research models listed in the attached file have been included in the current migration plan. Those models are located in the following directories:
Power (Basic Swap/Option) Model - M:\power2\pricing\Pwr_strc97.xls
Other Power Models - M:\user_pub\todd\models
All Gas Models - O:\Gas Structuring\Requested Files

Regards

Zhiyong

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Croucher Jr., Mike
Sent:	Tuesday, January 08, 2002 1:56 PM
To:	Davis, Angela; Koehler, Anne C.; Wei, Zhiyong
Cc:	James, Matthew; Coles, Frank
Subject:	FW: Model List

Angela, is there any way to identify the directory paths for the data contained in the attached document?  Is the data contained on the O:\ M:\ drive?  What is the full directory path....O:\directoryname\directoryname\etc.....?  This information will assist us in determining exactly what needs migrated. I am available to meet anytime and assist in anyway possible.  Thanks in advance.

Mike Croucher

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	McAuliffe, Bob
Sent:	Tuesday, January 08, 2002 1:19 PM
To:	Croucher Jr., Mike
Subject:	FW: Model List

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Davis, Angela
Sent:	Tuesday, January 08, 2002 1:06 PM
To:	McAuliffe, Bob
Subject:	FW: Model List

Angela D. Davis
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB3817
Houston, Texas 77019
Tel: (713) 345-8347
Fax: (713) 646-3393
e-mail: angela.davis@enron.com

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Koehler, Anne C.
Sent:	Monday, January 07, 2002 4:39 PM
To:	Davis, Angela
Subject:	FW: Model List

More info to go to Netco.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Port, David
Sent:	Monday, January  7, 2002 4:31 PM
To:	Wei, Zhiyong
Cc:	Koehler, Anne C.; Andrews, Naveen
Subject:	FW: Model List

Here's what we need day 1

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Andrews, Naveen
Sent:	Monday, January 07, 2002 11:14 AM
To:	Port, David
Subject:	Model List

Dave,
       Here is a list of models I can come up with.  There are probably more, but lets try to get these as a start.
       The spreadsheets and the relevant source code (in C) is needed.
Naveen

 << File: List of Research Models.doc >>


Start Date: 1/26/02; HourAhead hour: 4;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002012604.txt


Please see attached.

Regards,

Aparna Rajaram
Ph: (713) 345-4563
Fax: (713) 853-9476
Aparna.Rajaram@enron.com