Will be there.  Hope you're having a good  day, sweets.

 -----Original Message-----
From: Cuilla, Martin [mailto:Martin.Cuilla@ENRON.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 10:36 AM
To: zwharton@dawray.com
Subject:

The title company is at 1100 Louisiana at the corner of Dallas.  We are
supposed to meet at 3:30 but I suppose that if you are running a little late
I can start signing until you get there.

Directions
Miles
1.	 Start out going East on WESTHEIMER RD towards CHIMNEY ROCK RD by
turning left.	 0.0
2.	 Turn RIGHT onto CHIMNEY ROCK RD.	 0.9
3.	 Turn LEFT onto SOUTHWEST FRWY.	 0.1
4.	 Take the US-59 NORTH ramp.	 0.2
5.	 Merge onto US-59 N.	 5.1
6.	 Take TX-527 N towards DOWNTOWN/LOUISIANA ST.	 0.0
7.	 Merge onto TX-527 N.	 0.7
8.	 Take the LOUISIANA ST exit.	 0.0
9.	 Stay straight to go onto LOUISIANA ST.	 1.4

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Dave Delaney has asked that we accelerate our look at space alternatives in
Mexico City.  If you assume that you and Jaime and (perhaps) one person from
EBS remain there, what do you think the cost is (or when can you let me
know)?


Dear Mr.Kaminski,

I have found the EnronOnline project a very interesting one and have enjoyed
working with everyone in the Research department as well as those from other
departments. I am keenly interested in this area and was wondering if there
would be any summer internship opportunities. I have attached my resume to
this mail for your review and look forward to hearing from you soon.

Thank you

IVY GHOSE
RICE MBA 2002

 - resume.doc


FYI.  Today Craig Barrett, CEO of Intel, publicly opposed the "state
takeover" plan released by California's Treasurer last Friday, saying,  "I'm
not a great fan of government getting involved in the private sector,
especially delivering a key commodity to the private sector."
(SF Chronicle, 01.09.01)

Might be a good opportunity to try in earnest to enlist Silicon Valley in our
efforts to get California moving in the right direction, despite itself.

Barrett said the answer is easing siting rules in order to get more power on
line sooner and blamed officials who've opposed power plants for seriously
exacerbating the problems in California.

Because of CA' power woes, Barrett said that he'd build new facilities
anywhere but in California.

Jeff

	Karen Denne
	01/09/2001 03:02 PM

		 To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda
Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Reactive Statement to Davis' Plan

The following is a draft reactive statement to Gov. Davis' State of the State
address last night.  If you have any comments or changes, please let me know
so I can route a final version.  Thanks! kd

We're disappointed with Gov. Davis' plan to address the energy crisis in
California.  While the governor has shown some recognition of the problem,
which is simply an issue of supply and demand, we disagree with his proposed
solutions.  There are four problems in the California market: excess reliance
on spot markets, insufficient demand side response, insufficient supplies,
and financially unstable institutions.   The solutions, simply put, should be
to decrease demand, increase supply, reduce exposure to spot prices and
provide financial support to the utilities.  Gov. Davis' eight points do not
address the fundamental supply and demand issue.  Furthermore, the governor's
rhetoric detracts from implementing real solutions.

If pressed on specifics:
Rather than mandating sales of power in-state, California would be better
served by providing the utilities with strong incentives to enter into
long-term contracts and by requiring them to buy some portion of their
forward requirements from new in-state generation.
We do not understand how Gov. Davis has the constitutionality to mandate the
flow of electricity into California, particularly in states that export to
California.
The governor failed to address the credit issue of the state's two utilities
(possible solution:near-term credit guarantees).


FYI.
---------------------- Forwarded by Steve C Hall/PDX/ECT on 02/01/2001 02:55
PM ---------------------------

"Woertz, Byron" <BWoertz@caiso.com> on 02/01/2001 02:18:53 PM
To: ISO Market Participants
<IMCEAEX-_O=CAISO_OU=CORPORATE_CN=DISTRIBUTION+20LISTS_CN=ISO+20MARKET+20PARTI
CIPANTS@caiso.com>
cc:

Subject: CAISO Notice - Letter from PG&E Regarding Payment for November, 2
000 Invoice

  ISO Market Participants:
  On January 31, 2001, the CEO of the California ISO received
by fax a letter from Joseph C. Henri, Director of Utility Electric Portfolio
Management at Pacific Gas and Electric Co. (PG&E). Mr. Henri stated that
PG&E was providing notice pursuant to Sections 15.1 and 15.2 of the ISO
Tariff that "Uncontrollable Forces prevent PG&E from performing all of its
obligations under the ISO Tariff."  Mr. Henri's letter identified
"government regulations and market conditions" as "forces beyond PG&E's
reasonable control."  In addition, Mr. Henri stated that the temporary
electric rate increase ordered by the California Public Utilities Commission
on January 4, 2001 was "an amount far below that necessary to enable PG&E to
generate sufficient cash to pay its ongoing procurement bills."
  Mr. Henri continued by stating that "PG&E...lacks the funds
to pay in full its bill from the Independent System Operator for November
power purchases, due on February 1, 2001."   Further, Mr. Henri stated that
"because PG&E's inability to make full payment is due to Uncontrollable
Forces, the ISO Tariff precludes the Independent Service (sic.) Operator
from imposing any sanctions against PG&E."
  Mr. Henri concluded by stating that PG&E's efforts to secure
relief from these circumstances continue and that PG&E will inform the ISO
as soon as it is able to resume making full payment for its wholesale power
purchases.
  At present, the California ISO neither accepts nor rejects
the claims made in Mr. Henri's letter. The purpose of this market notice is
to fully inform Market Participants who may have claims directly against
PG&E based on PG&E's failure to pay in full ISO invoices.

  Byron Woertz
  Director, Client Relations


Attached is a Merrill Lynch report concerning Sempra and rate uncertainty in
Southern California.


This is an index forward deal sold to EES by EPMI Short Term California - 80
MW, off-peak hours, on NP-15. I just spoke with Niclas, who confirmed this
was the information he was looking for. If you need anything else, please
don't hesitate to e-mail or call.

Thanks,
Kate
West Desk Deal Control
503.464.7486

Carla Hoffman
12/06/2000 11:30 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Niclas Egmar/HOU/EES@EES

Subject: 11_11 correction VIP

Hi Kate,

This deal needs to be researched.  Can you help looking into its origin?

Thanks,

Carla
---------------------- Forwarded by Carla Hoffman/PDX/ECT on 12/06/2000 11:38
AM ---------------------------

Niclas Egmar@EES
12/04/2000 09:39 AM
To: Carla Hoffman/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: 11_11 correction VIP

---------------------- Forwarded by Niclas Egmar/HOU/EES on 12/04/2000 11:39
AM ---------------------------

Niclas Egmar
12/01/2000 03:30 PM
To: Phillip Platter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Mallory/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Daniel Kang/HOU/EES@EES, Jennifer Johnson/HOU/EES@EES, Wayne
Kimball/HOU/EES@EES, Jubran Whalan/HOU/EES@EES, Neil Bresnan/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: 11_11 correction

I talked to Phil about a trade on  11/11/00  regarding 640 MW deal number
456233.1 could you please send me  and Jennifer Johnson some more detail
about this deal.
Is this an hour a head deal?
What hours are involved?

Thanks alot

Niclas


Sara, our CFO remembers executing one of these some time ago, but we cannot
locate the document yet. If we can't get our hands on it by next week, we
will go ahead and do a new form. Please resend the electornic form of the
ISDA master agreement. Your prior transmission seems to have been deleted in
a clean-up of the e-mails over here.. Thanks

JWVS


Sounds great! Can I wear my CCC letter jacket?
Kasey

----- Original Message -----
From: "Laura Jahnke" <ljahnke@aerotek.com>
To: "Susan Edwards" <susan_s_edwards@yahoo.com>; <sscott5@enron.com>; "Ash
Mace" <ashley.a.mace@williams.com>; <Lisa.Gillette@enron.com>;
<elaina5@hotmail.com>; "Katy Hester" <katyhester@hotmail.com>; "Emily
Hillegeist" <ehillegeist@hotmail.com>; <Kelbarker@aol.com>; "Kasey Walker"
<kaseywalker@mindspring.com>; <sonderfan@hotmail.com>;
<lodgesarah@hotmail.com>; "Laura White" <LWhite@StageStores.com>;
<Corinne_Connally@Dell.com>
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2000 7:20 AM
Subject: Christmas Dinner

> Girls-
> Thank you for the responses.  So far it has been overwhelmingly
> positive!  I really can't wait to get us all together.  Emily had
> suggested Ousies's Table-as well as a coworker of mine.  Yesterday
> during our lunch break we went and looked at Ousies's and it seems
> pretty cute.  Unfortunately they were not open, but I heard they light
> it up at night and it is supposed to be really pretty.  The other
> suggestion is Benji's.  Lis-you made a good point.  It would be nice to
> try somewhere new.
> I have not heard from Sarah or Kelly-so if you talk to them-please pass
> them the message.  I know Kelly usually checks her email, but I am not
> sure about Sarah.  If anyone has a number for her-let me know.  I also
> haven't heard from Susan Scott-so Lisa- you are in charge of that.
> Ashley-I know you've gotten this message-so reply!  : )
> Corinne-Sorry that you will not be able to make it. : (  If anything
> changes-let us know.
> Jen's flight comes in around 7 that night-so I thought we would make the
> reservations for 8-830 so she has time to make it.
> Let me know what ya'll think.
> -Laura
>
>


----- Forwarded by Miyung Buster/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 10/09/2000 10:03 AM
-----

	djcustomclips@djinteractive.com
	10/05/2000 03:19 PM
	Please respond to nobody

		 To: 86464@WCTOPICS.djnr.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Utilities, Electric: Deregulation: GEORGE W. BUSH CRITICIZES
CLINTON-GORE'S ENERGY POLICY ...

GEORGE W. BUSH CRITICIZES CLINTON-GORE'S ENERGY POLICY IN ANNOUNCING HIS OWN
?
10/04/2000
Foster Electric Report
7
(c) Copyright 2000, Foster Associates, Inc.

While attacking the Clinton-Gore Administration's "nonexistent" national
energy policy, Republican presidential candidate George W. Bush recently
revealed his own policy.

"Despite presiding over a period of unprecedented economic growth and
increasing energy demand, it is clear that the Clinton-Gore Administration
has done little to plan for America's future energy needs," said a Bush
position paper on energy issues. "At best, for the last seven-and-a-half
years the Administration has had no energy policy. At worst, its policy has
been to ignore America's increasing reliance on foreign oil, while
discouraging domestic energy exploration and production. Moreover, the
Administration's actions have been inherently contradictory: extolling the
virtues of information technology, but failing to plan for the increased
energy needs of the New Economy; promoting the development of electric
vehicles, but discouraging investment in new electrical generating capacity."

In particular, Bush criticized the Administration for allowing U.S.
dependence on foreign oil to jump to a record 56 percent, compared with only
36 percent during the 1973 oil crisis. As important as oil is, however,
"increasingly, the most critical source of energy for the country is
electricity, which is principally produced not by oil, but by natural gas,
coal, nuclear energy, and hydroelectric power," asserted the Bush energy
policy outline.

And while the Clinton-Gore Administration has been pushing Americans to
increase their use of renewable energy resources, Bush believes that a
national energy policy "must also be realistic about our current situation. .
. . [and] must reflect the fact that, for the foreseeable future,
hydrocarbons -- oil, coal, and especially clean-burning natural gas -- will
continue to play a critical role in meeting the growing energy needs of the
New Economy. Hydroelectric and nuclear power will also play an important
role."

Bush also blasted the current Administration for discouraging investment in
additional electrical generating capacity and transmission, leaving certain
areas of the country vulnerable to regional brownouts and blackouts. In
particular, the presidential hopeful noted that Internet-related activities
now consume about 13 percent of U.S. electric output. Further, while in 1975
roughly 25 percent of U.S. energy demand was delivered as electricity, Bush's
energy outline said this figure has risen to almost 37 percent and will
continue to rise "due to the growth of the New Economy."

"Intel estimates the number of Internet nodes will reach one billion sometime
during the current decade," noted Bush. "New web sites translate into more
users, more traffic, more servers, more peripherals, more air conditioning --
in short, more demand for electricity and for the fuels that are used to
produce it."

And as demand keeps growing, the nation's generating fleet is getting older.
By 2015, about 60 percent of the existing coal-fired plants and 40 percent of
nuclear plants will be more than 40-years-old. At the same time, the nation's
electric transmission grid desperately needs new investment as it bends under
the strain of greater power flows created by competition in wholesale
electricity markets. "Unfortunately, the Clinton-Gore Administration has
failed to establish a framework to encourage this investment," Bush asserted.

Bush next noted the nation's dependence on coal to produce 50 percent of the
nation's electricity supply. Yet, while the U.S. holds more than 25 percent
of the world's coal reserves, which would be enough to produce power at
current production rates for the next 250 years, Bush said the current
Administration's policies and implementation of the Kyoto global climate
treaty would reduce electricity derived from coal to less than 10 percent by
2020.

"As a result, electricity prices would increase 50 percent in real terms and
a massive investment in natural gas infrastructure would be required to
replace the lost coal capacity," Bush continued. Further, substantial
emission reductions "could be more readily achieved by scheduling emission
reductions to coincide with technological advances, but the Administration is
instead insisting upon substantial reductions before these advances can be
reasonably deployed."

The Clinton-Gore Administration was also blasted by Bush for doing nothing
about replacing the 40 percent of the nation's electricity needs currently
being met by the nuclear capacity expected to be retired by 2020 and for the
costly and time consuming current hydropower relicensing process, as well as
for not taking a stand on Secretary of the Interior Bruce Babbitt's open
advocacy of destroying dams.

Finally, Bush -- who passed an electric industry deregulation bill while
governor of Texas -- complained that the Administration has not pushed hard
enough for a federal electric industry deregulation bill. "Roughly half of
the states, including Texas, have passed some form of electric restructuring
legislation to deal with retail markets," Bush stated. "It has become
increasingly clear, however, that federal legislation is needed to assure the
reliability of the nation's electrical grid, and to promote consumer choice
by removing federal barriers to competition. Unfortunately, the
Administration has not offered the leadership necessary to pass a
comprehensive electric restructuring bill, thus preventing consumers from
receiving all of the benefits that deregulation can provide."

In contrast to the Administration, the position paper said Bush "recognizes
the need for a comprehensive, strategic approach to ensuring U.S. energy
security. He understands that the only way to meet America's growing energy
needs is to utilize a range of fuels and technologies: oil, natural gas,
coal, nuclear, hydroelectric, wind, and biomass, as well as increased
conservation. He also understands the critical need to help low-income
Americans with their energy bills."

Thus, if elected president, Bush pledged to work with Canada and Mexico to
develop a North American energy policy. "The U.S. must develop policies and
strategies to support the increasing cross-border flows of oil, natural gas
and electricity within North America," Bush explained. "Governor Bush and his
Secretary of Energy will work with their counterparts in Canada and Mexico to
improve oil and gas distribution, enhance the reliability of the North
American electrical grid, and promote cross-border energy trade. For example,
Canada and the U.S. could work together to streamline permitting so that a
natural gas pipeline from Alaska to the Midwest could be built."

On whether to use the strategic petroleum reserve (SPR)to mitigate high oil
prices, Bush said no. Instead, he would like to create a privately-managed
Northeast home heating oil reserve. "However, he does not believe that the
government should be actively trading petroleum products into, and out of,
storage, as this represents significant government involvement in the oil
markets," said the paper. "Rather, the government should contract with
private companies to perform storage services. This will minimize government
expenditures and interference in the market, while ensuring that heating oil
supplies will be available when needed."

To help the nation meet "the electricity demands of the new economy," Bush
pledged to encourage the development of North American oil and natural gas
resources. As part of this strategy, Bush would propose to open 8 percent of
the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge "to environmentally responsible
exploration," which could replace the oil that the U.S. now imports from
Iraq, and "examine whether certain promising natural gas reserves in federal
lands should be opened to environmentally responsible and regulated
exploration."

Bush also recognizes the need for environmentally responsible development of
existing coal, nuclear, and hydro capacity. Thus, as president, he pledged to
fund research into "Clean Coal" technologies and support the permanent
extension of the existing Rtax credit.

To facilitate the transfer of nuclear assets to U.S. utilities specializing
in operating nuclear power facilities, Bush promised to seek legislation
clarifying that the transfer of plant decommissioning funds not be taxed as
part of the transaction. On hydropower, Bush wants to streamline the
relicensing process and oppose efforts to breach hydroelectric dams.

Bush also insisted that comprehensive electric industry deregulation
legislation is necessary "to encourage the investment necessary to expand
electrical generating capacity," maintain reliability, and encourage
competition. "Having enacted one of the most successful and comprehensive
electricity deregulation bills in the nation, Governor Bush understands the
need for complementary federal deregulation legislation," the position paper
stated.

Thus, as president, Bush would support federal legislation that (1) empowers
a single organization to oversee reliability concerns and assess penalties
for those that abuse the transmission grid, (2) protects consumers, and (3)
repeals the Public Utility Holding Company Act and ends the mandatory
purchase requirement of the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978.

A President Bush would also promote separate legislation (1) establishing
mandatory reduction targets for emissions of four main pollutants: sulfur
dioxide, nitrogen oxide, mercury and carbon dioxide; (2) phasing in these
emissions reductions over a "reasonable" time period; (3) allowing utilities
to make modifications to their plants without fear of new litigation under
the Environmental Protection Agency's new source review requirements; and (4)
providing market-based incentives, such as emissions trading and carbon
credits, to help industry achieve the required reductions.

To encourage the development of renewable and alternative energy sources and
to promote conservation, Bush would propose to create a "Royalties
Conservation Fund" that would earmark royalties collected from new oil and
gas exploration on federal lands to fund conservation efforts. "It is
estimated that royalties collected from opening just 8 percent of the Arctic
National Wildlife Refuge to oil and gas exploration could produce hundreds of
millions of dollars in royalties annually," the paper noted. Bush would also
support tax credits for electricity produced from alternative and renewable
resources.

Finally, among other things, Bush plans to (1) require federal regulators "to
develop a comprehensive policy for approving pipelines, (2) invest $1 billion
over ten years "to establish clear rules to help efficient utilities purchase
nuclear plants, streamline the relicensing process for hydroelectric
projects, and oppose the breaching of dams"; (3) and propose legislation
requiring electric utilities to reduce harmful emissions, not just asking
them to do so voluntarily as advocated by Vice President Gore.

Folder Name: Utilities, Electric: Deregulation
Relevance Score on Scale of 100: 97

______________________________________________________________________
To review or revise your folder, visit Dow Jones CustomClips or contact Dow
Jones Customer  Service by e-mail at custom.news@bis.dowjones.com or by phone
at 800-369-7466. (Outside the U.S. and  Canada, call 609-452-1511 or contact
your local sales representative.)
______________________________________________________________________
Copyright (c) 2000 Dow Jones &Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved


pls review to see if this will work for you.........!
---------------------- Forwarded by Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron on 06/01/2001 10:57
AM ---------------------------

Cynthia Biggs <cynthia.biggs@travelpark.com> on 06/01/2001 10:49:33 AM
To: "'joseph.alamo@enron.com'" <joseph.alamo@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: car reservation for jeff dasovich

                                          AGENT CB/CB BOOKING REF YYSCQM

                                          DASOVICH/JEFF
                                          ENRON CORP
                                          101 CALIFORNIA ST STE 1950
  ENRON CORP                              SAN FRANCISCO CA 94111
                                          CAR RES ONLYH

  DATE:  JUN 01 2001

CAR                   04JUN HERTZ                  SAN F CA
                      05JUN CONFIRMATION: B4752A11825
                            FULL 4-DOOR CAR AUTOMATIC AIR
                            RATE: USD53.99- .00 UNL DY 27.00- UNL XH
                            RATE GUARANTEED
                            PICK-UP: 433 MASON STREET, SAN FRANCISCO
                            DROP-OFF: 433 MASON STREET, SAN FRANCISCO
SCO

MISCELLANEOUS         03OCT HOUSTON TX
                      WED   ** THANK YOU FOR USING THE TAP **

DASOVICH/JEFF  S0C0011R1000

ALL FARES ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE UNTIL TICKETED/PURCHASED


What about the questions I asked about whether the new entity would comply
with Order No. 2000 (especially if the state has the vertically integrated
utilities operate the system)?  See attached word version of my orginal
E-mail.

02/21/2001 11:03 AM
Bernadette Hawkins@ENRON
Bernadette Hawkins@ENRON
Bernadette Hawkins@ENRON
02/21/2001 11:03 AM
02/21/2001 11:03 AM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda
Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron,
Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Scope of FERC Jurisdiction Over State-Owned Utility

Attached is a memo that addreses the FERC's jurisdiction over the
transfer/sales of utility assets to the state of California.  At a minimum,
FERC must approve the transfer.  Call if you have questions.  Joe
----- Forwarded by Bernadette Hawkins/Corp/Enron on 02/21/2001 01:55 PM -----

	"Tracey Bradley" <tbradley@bracepatt.com>
	02/21/2001 01:10 PM

		 To: <jhartso@enron.com>
		 cc: <jdwatkiss@aol.com>, "Andrea Settanni" <asettanni@bracepatt.com>,
"Ronald Carroll" <rcarroll@bracepatt.com>
		 Subject: Scope of FERC Jurisdiction Over State-Owned Utility

Please see attached memorandum.  We have also attached FERC's orders
addressing LIPA's acquisition of LILCO's transmission assets and LIPA's open
access tariff.  Please call if you have any questions.

 - 0138443.01
 - EC97-45.TXT
 - NJ98-4.TXT


We have received the executed EEI Master Power Purchase and Sale Agreement dated 7/19/2001 from the referenced CP.  Copies will be given to legal and credit.


richard, this did not change from when you saw it.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Bates, William" <wbates@mdbe.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Friday, September 28, 2001 1:22 PM
To:	'walpertb@mto.com'
Cc:	Jines, Michael L.; Gussett, Sheryl Esq.; 'john.c.herbert@dynegy.com'; Mellencamp, Lisa; 'tlauria@whitecase.com'; 'Philip Warden (E-mail)'; 'ceklund@llgm.com'; 'collt@perkinscoie.com'; 'zack.starbird@mirant.com'
Subject:	SCE
Importance:	High

E-MAIL NOTICE

This e-mail message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and
may contain confidential and/or privileged information. Any review, use,
disclosure or distribution by persons or entities other than the
intended recipient(s) is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply and destroy all copies of
the original message. Thank you.

To reply to our E-mail Administrator directly, send an email to
Postmaster@mdbe.com or call (415) 393-2000 and delete this email.

McCUTCHEN, DOYLE, BROWN & ENERSEN, LLP

http://www.mccutchen.com

 - 52060668_2.DOC


Two-hundred fifty-eight chart envelopes were retrieved from the Houston Office, this afternoon and are now in the hands of GMS.  There are indications that some of the charts have been in the post office since February 4th.  The postal account had been financially depleted for two to three weeks   Enron Property Management will replenish the account no later than Thursday of this week and will put in place the necessary controls to ensure the account is always funded therefore no more charts should be held hostage.

If you have questions, please advise.

Don


Sarah I trust you.  Just tell her what we need.


I've changed the term to 12/4, and I'm going to make a note in our daily deal
correction report that this was due to a late report from EES. Thanks for
catching this.

Kate

Stephanie Piwetz   12/19/2000 09:02 AM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: 12/4 term

Kate, below is the EES spreadsheet that has the shows the powerex trade shown
on 12/4/00.  Please verify and we can backdate the trade and reconfirm the
document, or we can initial Powerex change and send back to them to show that
we are in agreement.  Thanks Stephanie

---------------------- Forwarded by Stephanie Piwetz/HOU/ECT on 12/19/2000
10:54 AM ---------------------------

Jubran Whalan@EES
12/04/2000 04:42 PM
To: Daily Term Hedges for EES Portfolio
cc:
Subject: 12/4 term

CHECK CAREFULLY ONE COB TRANSACTION IS NORTH TO SOUTH AND ONE IS SOUTH TO
NORTH.


---------------------- Forwarded by Thomas A Martin/HOU/ECT on 03/20/2001
03:52 PM ---------------------------

Thomas A Martin
05/09/2000 06:07 PM
To: Greg Brazaitis/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: East Side Prospects: Bammel Compression Options

Greg,

I am short traders this week and Schwieger is out until Thursday afternoon.
Is there any way that we can move this meeting to Friday afternoon.  Jim and
I would like to be involved but we can not make it Wednesday morning.  If the
meeting can not be changed then Ed will go in our behalf.

Thanks,
Tom


California Power-Price Boost Not Needed, Agency Says (Update1)
By Daniel Taub

Sacramento, California, July 13 (Bloomberg) -- California regulators won't need to raise electricity prices for consumers to cover a planned $13.4 billion bond sale, said a spokesman for the agency that buys power on behalf of the state's utilities.

The California Department of Water Resources, which has spent more than $7.7 billion on power this year, is expected to recommend a rate increase of as much as 25 percent, Dow Jones reported today, citing three unnamed members of the state's Public Utilities Commission. Oscar Hidalgo, a spokesman for the agency, said no rate increase is expected.

``Our folks are stunned by this revelation because it is nowhere near what our numbers show,'' Hidalgo said. ``In fact our numbers show that there is no need for any increase beyond what's already been done.''

The Department of Water Resources will submit a report to the California Public Utilities Commission today or Monday with the state's revenue requirements for repaying a planned $13.4 billion bond sale, Hidalgo said. The bonds are to be repaid by customers of utilities owned by PG&E Corp., Edison International and Sempra Energy.

The bond sales, the largest municipal offering in U.S. history, are scheduled to begin in September. Governor Gray Davis has said repeatedly that he believes the bonds can be repaid without further rate increases. His position hasn't changed, spokesman Steve Maviglio said today.

Previous Increases

In March, the PUC voted to boost rates by 3 cents a kilowatt- hour at the state's two largest utilities. Rates at PG&E's Pacific Gas & Electric, the largest California utility, would rise by as much as 36 percent and Southern California Edison rates would rise by as much as 27 percent, the PUC said at the time.

The average consumer-price increase would be 30 percent, the PUC said. The increase, the second this year, was intended to help the state pay for power purchases. The PUC voted in January to raise rates about 10 percent.

California Treasurer Philip Angelides has said that the bonds will let the state cushion the immediate rate impact on residents and businesses by spreading power costs over time. The debt will be repaid over 15 years.

Investors have said they can't predict how the bonds will be received without knowing how much cushion is built into the revenue pledge backing the debt.

Legislation that paved the way for the bonds allows the state to raise electricity rates as needed to cover debt repayment. That pledge, typical for revenue bonds, usually entails a promise to raise a specific level of money annually to cover interest and principal payments on the debt and provide an added cushion.

That formula, known as a debt service coverage ratio, must result in investment-grade ratings for California's power bonds, according to the legislation. Investors want assurance that an issuer will raise rates to maintain the promised cushion, even if increases aren't needed at the time of the bond sale.


It has become customary to prepare Unanimous Consents of Directors for many
transactions even if such actions are not required by the relevant By-laws
and/or Certificate of Incorporation.  Please consider carefully whether
Unanimous Consents of Directors are necessary or appropriate in a particular
transaction, i.e., the transaction is a significant transaction or evidence
of authority is required for a legal opinion.  When in doubt, please review
the By-laws and Certificate of Incorporation of the relevant entity and
discuss the matter with a member of the Office of the General Counsel.

Thank you.


Hugo, you can go ahead and remove me from the distribution list as I have
moved out of the controls group.  Good luck with everything, it has been
great working with you.


The gas desk lost approx $30MM, with the west desk losing approx. 50

Frank


---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron on 04/06/2001
11:32 AM ---------------------------
MARY
CLARK
04/06/2001 11:31 AM

To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron, Sarah Palmer/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: California story

Rick:  The California/dereg story and a sidebar are attached for your
review.  Please circulate to all on your team who need to review them.

We need to receive all comments by Monday, April 9.  I am out on Monday, so
please send comments/approval to Sarah Palmer.

Thanks for the opportunity to do this story.  I think it will be of great
interest to employees.

Mary


Tara,

This response was not from me - it was from Ann Hicks in Houston who is the
unfortunate person who receives a large number of mails destined for me
because the sender is careless when sending their message.

Many Thanks

Ann

From: Tana Jones on 07/07/2000 08:36 CDT
To: Anne Hicks/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Enron North America Corp. NYMEX Hedge Exemption Applications

Anne,

You didn't write any message on your response, so I am not sure if you have a
futures trading account or not.  Is that why you responded to Mark's email?

	Mark Taylor
	06/22/2000 01:22 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Enron North America Corp. NYMEX Hedge Exemption Applications

----- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 06/22/2000 01:22 PM -----

	Ann Hicks@ENRON
	06/22/2000 09:41 AM

		 To: Anne Hicks/LON/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Enron North America Corp. NYMEX Hedge Exemption Applications

----- Forwarded by Ann Hicks/NA/Enron on 06/22/2000 09:40 AM -----

	Mark Taylor
	Sent by: Enron Announcements
	06/21/2000 06:39 PM

		 To: All Enron Houston, Everyone_in_ECT_Calgary, Everyone_in_ECT_London,
Everyone_in_ECT_Portland, Everyone_in_ECT_New York, Everyone_in_ECT_Denver,
Everyone_in_ECT_Oslo, Everyone_in_ECT_Singapore, EI-Australia, Buenos Aires
Argentina - Office Staff, Buenos Aires Argentina - TGS Office Staff, Enron
Everyone_EOG_Denver, Enron Everyone_EOG_Calgary
		 cc:
		 Subject: Enron North America Corp. NYMEX Hedge Exemption Applications

We are in the process of preparing applications for position limit exemptions
for ENA,s NYMEX energy commodities futures trading.  These applications
require that ENA represent whether its officers, employees, owners, or agents
have a power of attorney, control or have a financial interest in any other
related commodity future(s) account either individually or acting with
another person pursuant to express or implied agreement.

Please direct any responses to my paralegal, Tana Jones, via intercompany
email or call her at (713) 853-3399 by the end of business Friday, June 30,
2000 if you have any power of attorney, control or have a financial interest
in any commodity futures account (other than an ENA or other trading
affiliate account).

IF YOU DO NOT HAVE A COMMODITY FUTURES ACCOUNT, YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESPOND TO
THIS REQUEST.


I'm not sure if it matters but it will make it easier to find, I think.

	From:  John M Singer @ ENRON                           06/21/2000 09:08 AM

To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Peoples

Yes, the producer receives a fixed price, however, these deals are probably
in TAGG as Nymex plus basis deals.  Phillips deal was transferred to ENA,
Power Gas was triggered on ENA books.
Or does it matter???

Chris Germany@ECT
06/21/2000 08:42 AM
To: John M Singer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Peoples

So both of these suppliers are now fixed price because  they locked in the
NYMX?


You have signed the last beam....
 Now  watch it rise.

Enron employees are invited to celebrate the
 Topping-Out of Enron Center South
 this afternoon at Antioch Park
3:45 pm - 4:30 pm.

In celebration of Arbor Day, tree saplings will be
handed out to all participants.

In the event of rain, the Topping-Out Celebration will air on IPTV Wednesday
and
the tree saplings will be distributed in the plaza today at 4:00 pm


AOPA ePilot Subscribers,
Please disregard the message at the top of this morning's issue
f "AOPA ePilot" that suggested that your AOPA membership was
bout to expire or that it was your last issue of the newsletter.
oliday computer gremlins conspired to erroneously send the
essage to most "ePilot" subscribers this morning.
Again, please disregard the message. We apologize for the error
nd will work to assure that it does not happen again. Thank you
or your patience and please have a happy new year.
Sincerely,
AOPA ePilot Staf


I have not looked at this file yet.  Please pass it on to whomever you think
might need it.

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 12/13/99 09:43
AM ---------------------------

Ed McMichael
12/13/99 08:27 AM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edith Cross/HOU/ECT@ECT, Billy
Lemmons/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dick Jenkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Colleen
Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: LDC deadline info.

FYI

Ed
---------------------- Forwarded by Ed McMichael/HOU/ECT on 12/13/99 08:25 AM
---------------------------

mflewellyn@columbiaenergygroup.com on 12/10/99 09:21:47 AM
To: Ed McMichael/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: LDC deadline info.

Attached is a spreadsheet containing all of the LDC nomination deadlines.  If
you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.

 - ldc deadlines.xls


good. thanks.  Jeff

Eric Gonzales
10/27/2000 11:39 AM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re:

yes.  Economics look good.  However, I have not seen the basic confirm letter
or associated term sheet.  I will review before we decide to pull the trigger.

To: Eric Gonzales/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re:

thanks for the update.  has eric groves gotten with you regarding the
H.Galleon, and the oman gas?

Eric Gonzales
10/27/2000 11:01 AM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re:

I am not sure what the fee is but yes there has already been a firm
commitment to speak at the meeting (Haug days).  I tried to get out of it but
too late.  We are turning our presentation into an EOL push for electronic
trading for LPG and LNG.

I will run down if we actually have to pay 200 grand as well.  Brochures -
yes there is a draft floating around but I have told these guys that I do not
want anything put together specifically for the meeting.  I thought we could
wait till we start making some cash and have a better handle on who we want
to focus on in terms of customers

Eric.

	From:  Jeffrey A Shankman                           27/10/2000 15:28

To: Eric Gonzales/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject:

Are we sponsoring gas tech (in houston) Nov 15 ish for $200,000?  What's up
with the brochures?  Yes? No?  Your call on all of this.

Jeff


Mr. Morgan has been asked to recommend to the Section's Nominating Committee
individuals who would be interested in serving on the Council .

The Council members serve a four-year term that will end 2005. The Council
has two regular meetings, one is the MidWinter Leadership Meeting and the
second is held in conjunction with the ABA's Annual Meeting. Members will be
asked to attend occasional conference calls as needed.

Please forward any recommendations or if you are interested in serving,
please forward those to Mr. Morgan, and he will send those on to the
Nominating Committee.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Mr. Morgan at
404/249-2050 or at charles.morgan@bellsouth.com or Emily Ward at
404/249-2717 or at emily.ward@bellsouth.com.

Emily N. Ward
Paralegal
BellSouth Corporation
404/249-2717
Fax 404/249-5901
emily.ward@bellsouth.com
Ipager: emilyward@bellsouthips.com


FYI - I made my staff burn the midnight oil last night putting together TW/NNG revenue summaries for review by the bankers that Rod/Kevin are working with.  Thought you might me interested in the report.  It gives a nice snapshot of our activity with our major counterparties.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Corman, Shelley
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 11:05 AM
To:	Hayslett, Rod
Cc:	Geaccone, Tracy
Subject:	TW Revenues by Counterparty
Importance:	High

First worksheet show summary gross transportation revenue by counterparty for the 12 months ended 9/30/01. Total transport revenue is $180.6 million.  Other worksheets show detail by contract and contract expiration dates.  This information has been furnished to Kevin Howard.  The only open question is how this data can be reconciled to financials.  I spoke with Tracy this morning and she reflects gross operating revenues for TW for this period of $200 M.  The difference is primarily fuel sales (which are not currently included in my numbers).


Here is the 1st draft of a wish list for systems.


Louise,

We are anyalzing and will get back to you with any issues we see.

One quick question, will EBIT or Income that is non-cash accure the same capital charge?

Thanks,

Kish

Louise Kitchen@ECT
04/12/2001 10:09 AM
To:	Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, W David Duran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jean Mrha/NA/Enron@Enron, Max Yzaguirre/NA/Enron@ENRON, Julie A Gomez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian Redmond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barry Tycholiz/NA/Enron@ENRON, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank W Vickers/NA/Enron@Enron, Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laura Luce/Corp/Enron@Enron, Thomas A Martin/Enron@EnronXGate, John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fred Lagrasta/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rob Milnthorp/CAL/ECT@ECT, Jonathan McKay/CAL/ECT@ECT, Don Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Josey/Enron@EnronXGate, Orlando Gonzalez/SA/Enron@Enron, Joe Kishkill/SA/Enron@Enron, Michael L Miller/Enron@EnronXGate, Ozzie Pagan/Enron@EnronXGate, Edward D Baughman/Enron@EnronXGate, Rogers Herndon/HOU/ECT@ect, Dana Davis/Enron@EnronXGate, Fletcher J Sturm/HOU/ECT@ECT, Doug Gilbert-Smith/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:	Joseph Deffner/Enron@EnronXGate, Wes Colwell/Enron@EnronXGate, John J Lavorato/Enron@EnronXGate

Subject:	Draft Capital Charge Memo

This is a draft memo we are planning to send out to start addressing the 15%  standard across all transactions.  Any issues please let me know.

Louise

Capital Book

To further the process of reaching the stated objectives of increasing Enron America's Velocity of Capital and associated Return on Invested Capital, we have decided to create a Capital Book. The Capital Book will have no profit target associated with it and will be managed by Joe Deffner. The purpose of creating this book is to ensure that all transactions within Enron Americas, with any form of capital requirement, are structured correctly and are allocated the appropriate cost of capital charge.

The previous numbers used in the Business Plans at the beginning of this year will remain for all transactions in place and where we hold assets. Therefore, on any assets currently held within each business area, the capital charge will remain at 15%. Internal ownership of these assets will be maintained by the originating Business Unit subject to the Internal Ownership Policy outlined below.

The cost of capital associated with all transactions in Enron Americas will be set by Joe. This process is separate and apart from the current RAC process for transactions which will continue unchanged.

Capital investments on balance sheet will continue to accrue a capital charge at the previously established rate of 15%. Transactions which are structured off credit will receive a pure market pass through of the actually incurred cost of capital as opposed to the previous 15% across the board charge. Transactions which are structured off balance sheet, but on credit will be priced based upon the financial impact on Enron America's overall credit capacity.

On transactions that deploy capital through the trading books, the Capital Book will take a finance reserve on each transaction, similar to the way the Credit Group takes a credit reserve. This finance reserve will be used specifically to fund the capital required for the transaction. As noted above, the Capital Book will have no budget and will essentially charge out to the origination and trading groups at actual cost.

By sending market-based capital pricing signals internally, Enron America's sources of capital and liquidity should be better optimized across the organization.

Questions regarding the Capital Book can be addressed to:
Joe Deffner		853-7117
Alan Quaintance	345-7731


Greg,
I have been a dedicated Enron employee for two years.  I was originally part of the Research group and now work for EIM Fundamentals.  This is a very difficult and exciting time both  for our company and for me as an employee.  I would like to be more involved in this process.  Does your office currently have ANY type of position where I can make most contribution to the company.
Thank you,

Yana Kristal
Enron Industrial Markets
(713) 345-8497


This warning is sent automatically to inform you that your mailbox is approaching the maximum size limit.
Your mailbox size is currently 87462 KB.

Mailbox size limits:

	When your mailbox reaches 75000 KB you will receive this message.To check the size of your mailbox:

   Right-click the mailbox (Outlook Today),
   Select Properties and click the Folder Size button.
  This method can be used on individual folders as well.

To make more space available, delete any items that are no longer needed such as Sent Items and Journal entries.

You must empty the Deleted Items folder after deleting items or the space will not be freed.

To turn Journaling off,
  click Tools | Options | Journaling Options and de-select all items.

See client Help for more information.


Attached are the clean and redline versions for the swap.  The changes are in
the "Valuation Date" section.  This is a final edit.  Please call if you have
any questions. Thanks.  Sara


Here is the Goldman Presentation


Today, we are forming Enron Global Services (EGS) in order to more closely align our asset-based businesses.

This reorganization will allow EGS to focus our resources on opportunities that present the highest value to Enron.  It will also accomplish the following:  1) enhanced synergies among our assets and personnel, 2) more effective prioritization of business opportunities, and 3) better management of Enron's asset-based businesses throughout the world.

Enron Global Services' energy asset portfolio includes the North American pipeline businesses of Enron Transportation Services (ETS), including Northern Border; the international pipeline, power and distribution operations of Enron Global Assets & Services (EGAS); Portland General Electric; EOTT Energy Corp; Enron Wind; Azurix and Wessex Water.

Reporting to me as the heads of their respective business units are:
?	Jim Hughes, President & COO - EGS/International
?	Danny McCarty, Managing Director & CCO - ETS
?	Bill Cordes, President - Northern Border Partners
?	Peggy Fowler, President & CEO - Portland General Electric
?	John Garrison, President & CEO - Azurix
?	Dana Gibbs, President & COO - EOTT Energy Corp
?	Colin Skellett, CEO - Wessex Water
?	Adam Umanoff, President & CEO - Enron Wind

With the creation of EGS, we hope to enhance the efficient utilization of our commercial support services.  To accomplish this, EGS' staff and operational functions will be headed by:
?	Rod Hayslett, Managing Director & CFO
?	Rob Walls, Managing Director & General Counsel
?	Phil Lowry, Managing Director, Pipeline Operations and Engineering & Construction
?	Brian Stanley, President & CEO - EEOS
?	Steve Hotte, Vice President & CIO
?	John Ambler, Vice President, Communications & PR
?	Gary Smith, Vice President, Human Resources

In addition, Rob Walls will continue to perform his role as Deputy General Counsel for Enron reporting to Jim Derrick.

Phil Lowry will be responsible for domestic pipeline operations, technical services and engineering & construction, as well as, international pipeline technical services and engineering & construction.  Brian Stanley will be responsible for technical services and engineering & construction for international power and distribution facilities.

Below is an organization chart for Enron Global Services, which displays the changes described here.  We are confident this new organization will focus our talent and capital appropriately.  Please join me in supporting this management team as it strives to maximize Enron's return on its assets.

<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>


This message is intended for eHRonline users only.

Due to a recent change to eHRonline, the URL (aka "Web address") for
accessing eHRonline needs to be changed on your computer.  The change
involves adding the letter "s" to the "http" reference in the URL.  The URL
for accessing eHRonline should be:   https://eHRonline.enron.com.

This change should be made by those who have added the URL as a favorite on
the browser.


Mark --- Tana was very helpful. Thank you for your help moving this issue
forwards.

We could use the following executed agreements:

Bethlehem  Steel
Kaiser
Alcoa
Tudor
U.S. Steel
Several Banks

You have about a dozen working agreements

Gen Electric/Honeywell/Allied Signal
Anheuser Busch
Bonneville
Emerson Electric
Falconbridge
Ford
Harvard
Hydro Quebec
LTV
Moore Capital
OK Tedi
Ormet
Phelps Dodge
Alcan
Trafigura

We can bring the following:

Catequil --- Fund/Old Tiger Team
Grupo Mexico/Southern Peru
Gen Motors
Vanalco
Coke
Pepsi
Ball
Crown Cork
Arco/BP
American National Can
BHP
Caxton-- Fund
Campbell -- Fund
Noranda
Perelli
Femsa -- Mexico
Commonwealth
Aluar
Michigan Ave Partners
Century Alum
Toyota
Southwire
Wabash

Justin ---- could you update us on legal structure, tax and regulation

Craig Young

From: Mark Taylor on 10/31/2000 06:30 PM
To: Craig Young/NY/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: ISDA

Craig:

Sorry I couldn't get back to you earlier.  I  asked Tana Jones to get you
access to our database that keeps track of financial master agreement
negotiations so you will always be up to date on where we stand with the
process.  If you haven't heard from her, please let me know.  Any word from
Justin on which Enron entity we will use for trading in the U.S.?

Mark

	Craig Young
	10/31/2000 10:09 AM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Craig Young/NY/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: ISDA

As a start could you advise if we have an ISDA with the following firms

Coke
Pepsi
Anheuser Busch
Gen Motors
Ford
Mercedes Benz
Steel Companies
Metal Companies
Container Companies
Hedgd Funds
Emerson Electric
Hydro Quebec
Bonneville

Do we have a clearing house for global ISDA agreements?

Craig Young
212-715-2342


Kim, The attached reflects NNG Marketing's allocation %'s for capital and allocations to TW.  The only thing I know of that will change is the Pricing desk.  Jo has ask me to get with you and Sean/Richard to determine what a fair allocation would be.  I am out for the rest of the year after today.  Can we review and determine any changes after the 1st?  I also had a summary of the kinds of things each of the teams were doing for TW but I can't seem to get my hands on it right now.  I'll look some more and maybe I'll have it for our discussion.

Dana L. Jones
NNG Commercial Support
713-853-5787


--- Deb Pepple <dpepplejes@netscape.net> wrote:
> Date: 13 Nov 00 12:32:39 PST
> From: Deb Pepple <dpepplejes@netscape.net>
> To: Angie Barnett <angieb46@yahoo.com>, Donna Hixon
> <dhixonhhe@netscape.net>,
>   Laurie Lauer <jakenlaneysmom@hotmail.com>, Jan
> Secor <JCsdaughter19@cs.com>,
>   <marshtusk@yahoo.com>, <noell@galaxyinternet.net>
> Subject: Fwd: [FW: What if...]
>
>
>
>
____________________________________________________________________
> Get your own FREE, personal Netscape WebMail account
> today at http://home.netscape.com/webmail
>

> ATTACHMENT part 2 message/rfc822 name=Forwarded
Message
> From: "Lyle Fisel" <lfisel@earthlink.net>
> To: "Deb Pepple (E-mail)" <dpepplejes@netscape.net>,
>         "Deb Walburn (E-mail)" <bdwalburn@juno.com>,
>         "Karla Funnell (E-mail)"
> <jimmie4ever@aol.com>
> Subject: FW: What if...
> Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 08:27:08 -0500
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sherry [mailto:tifkas@email.com]
> Sent: Monday, November 06, 2000 10:13 AM
> To: Holly Laughman; koinonos@egroups.com; shannon
> mahoney; Jan Yoder
> Subject: What if...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> What if, GOD couldn't take
> the
>   time to bless us today
>   because we couldn't take the time
> to thank Him
>   yesterday?
>
> What if GOD decided to
> stop
>      leading us tomorrow because
> we
>      didn't follow Him today?
>
> What if, we never
> saw another
>     flower bloom because we
>
> grumbled when GOD
>     sent the Rain?
>
> What if GOD didn't
> walk with us
>     today because we failed
> to
>     recognize it as His day?
>
> What if, GOD took away
> the Bible
>    tomorrow because we would
>     not
> read it today?
>
> What if, GOD took away His message
>
> because we failed to
>     listen to the messenger?
>
> What
> if, GOD didn't send His only
>     begotten Son because
> He
>     wanted us to be prepared to
> pay
>      the price for sin.
>
> What if, the door of
> the church
>     was closed because we did
>
> not open the door of our heart?
>
> What if, GOD stopped loving
> and
>     caring for us because we
>     failed
> to love
>     and care for others?
>
> What if, GOD would not
> hear us
>     today because we would not
>
> listen to Him?
>
> What if, GOD answered our prayers
>
> the way we answer His call
>     to service?
>
> What if, GOD
> met our needs the way
>     we give Him our
> lives???
>
>
>
>
>


Tracy,
I'm totally confused as to who we're supposed to send numbers to.  I know you got something for 3rd CE from Kenny.  Can you forward that to me so that I can make Mei-Ling happy?  Kenny is out of the office today.

Thanks,
Paula

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kaster, Mei-Ling
Sent:	Monday, October 08, 2001 9:45 AM
To:	Parrish, Paula J.
Subject:	3CE and Sept Flash

Paula,

I did not send you this before because I was told that Azurix will not be part of EGAS.  I was just told that we need to get Sept flash and 3CE of Azurix from you.  Please input Azurix Sept preliminary flash numbers directly in 3CE file ASAP and let me know when done.  Please call with any question.

Mei-Ling

From:	Kaster, Mei-Ling
Sent:	Wednesday, September 19, 2001 7:47 PM
To:	Alvares, Joana; Ausucua, Adrian; Berger, Peter; Boe, Larry A. (Lawrence); Brazzel, Tom; Cannell, Kathleen; Cunningham, Michael; Dominguez, Patrick; Dumayas, Danthea - EI; Eubanks, Archie N.; Howes, Carol; Martinez, Mary; McCann, Steven K.; McLaughlin, Sabrina; Monroe, James Joseph; Morales-Vazquez, Norma; Nelson, Joao; Nguyen, Thao; Nguyen, Yen; Ortiz, Mauricio; Parrish, Paula J.; Phillips, Monique; Rangel, Rafael; Ross, Todd; Salvatierra, Carlos; Schnorbus, Nicole; Tran, Joanne; Yao, Anne S.
Cc:	Tran, Agatha
Subject:	3rd CE and September Flash

Hi, everyone,

Here we go again.  You all know the drill very well.

The 3rd CE  is due on October 10 and the files are saved in g:\common\jvm\reporting\EGA Regions\2001\Current Estimate\3rd CE folder.

The requirements include

   1.   Major Assumptions
   2.   Income Statement in both Corp format and EGAS format( same as "Hannon format" - 100% project income, Enron's IBIT and Enron's NI).   A folder named "EGAS Format" was created within "3rd CE" folder for you to save "EGAS Format income statement".
   3.   Indirect Cash Flow
   4.   Variance Explanation for both 3CE vs Plan and 3CE vs 2CE( We only need the explanation of IBIT variance for 3CE vs 2CE)

Please provide the variance explanation for 3CE vs Plan in the "Variance Explanation" column (set up to the right of the monthly income statement) for your project.  Please provide the IBIT variance explanation for 3CE vs 2CE in the sheet named "Var Expl 3CE vs 2CE" for your project.

Just a few friendly reminders,

1.	Please tie out August actuals to Hyperion by September 26 and drop in September flash in the 3rd CE file. The tentative due date for September flash is Friday, October 5th. Please do not change September final flash numbers while you work on the 3rd CE.

2.	Please do not change the plan numbers.

3.	These files are linked to the consolidation file.  Please do not insert/delete columns/rows or change the page setup or print range.

4.	Please do not copy value to or put your links into those cells with formula such as "subtotal" or "total".

We all have very tight deadlines among plan, forecast, earnings release, current estimate and others.  Your cooperation is very imperative to the success of these processes.   Please adhere to the due dates if all possible.  Please feel free to call with any question or suggestion.  Thanks for your effort and assistance.

Mei-Ling


Attached is a list of committee members approved at the annual meeting held
November 16, 2001.

R. A. Bulley
 - bcommterms11-16-01.doc


After talking with Kevin P., he said to change the sinks on the firm you want
to TVA.  Joe and I will prepare to address the tariff issue at FERC (pro
forma requires ultimate source and sink) to hopefully get the pro forma
tariff changed.  Several other providers have raised this issue and backed
off from the requirement.

Patrick Hanse
12/20/99 05:14 PM
To: Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Bill Rust/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rogers Herndon/HOU/ECT@ect, James B
Fallon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Dutta/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: TVA transmission requests

Per out requests on Ameren from CE to TVA, we are confirmed on 50 mw's /
month June-Sept. (With TVA our SINK).  We also have another 150 mw's /month
July-Aug.  w/ CE source, TVA sink, that are in  "STUDY" mode.

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kevin M Presto                           12/20/99 05:02 PM

To: Bill Rust/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Rogers Herndon/HOU/ECT@ect, James B Fallon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patrick
Hanse/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Dutta/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: TVA transmission requests

Thanks for the update Bill.

I take issue with TVA's statement regarding denial of firm transmission to
our CA's (Enron CA is the sink).   TVA is correct with their statement
regarding netting of firm transmission (ie, very few transmission providers
net firm transmission).  However, TVA, in the implementation of the NERC
Policy letter, stated that they will make firm transmission available to and
from each control area equal to the capacity capability of the generation and
non-firm transmission availability from our control areas equal to TVA's own
ATC to and from each interconnected control area.

TVA's denial of firm transmission sinking to our control area for the reason
stated in Bill's e-mail is wrong.  Although the majority of our firm
transmission requests utilize the 3 control areas as sources (with POD's of
SOCO, EES, and AMRN), we should not tolerate denials of firm transmission
into our control areas because that is completely inconsistent with the NERC
Policy ruling.

By the way, what is the status of the transmission Terry requested from
Com-Ed to TVA (through Ameren)?  This would be a situation where our control
area would be a sink.  If TVA is, in fact, denying those firm transmission
requests where we are the sink, we need to print out a hard copy of the OASIS
denial and send a letter to NERC and FERC.  After further researching the
facts, Christi could you please work with Bill to draft a letter, if
necessary, to send to NERC.


Hello, Sweetness! Sorry I didn't get back to you right away. You guys should
come here! It is awesome! Jody, Eric Neibhur, and I drove up into the
mountains on Sunday and played in the snow. It was awesome. We got there in
less than an hour after stopping twice to look at the view. I tried to make
a snow angel, but it was more of an ice angel, really. Neither Jody nor Eric
had gloves, so they weren't too keen on making snowballs and throwing them
at me. Still, we had a great time.

Sat. we went to see this performance group Fischerspooner in sort of the
equivalent of the Rice Hotel while it was under construction. They wore
crazy costumes and danced around and sang over djed music. It was pretty
cool, especially since we snuck in the back door, even though it was free,
since we didn't have reservations. (I made an animation of it. I'm trying to
figure out how to put it online for y'all!) Then we went to Chinatown for
art openings, and that was really cool. Then we went to a renovated bowling
alley to see a secret show by Kim Deal, but she didn't play cuz supposedly
Kelly Deal got married that day. But there was an alright band w/ the most
Amazingly cute girl singer, so it all good.

So you guys have to come here! Come here! C'mere!

See yu on Fri at Jessica's opening at Lawndale, then on Sat at the wedding.
Yeah!!!!!

xoxoxox,
Al Herrmann
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com


Hi Lousie,

I will bring you up an initial set in an hour or so.

Savita

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kitchen, Louise
Sent:	Tuesday, August 07, 2001 1:18 PM
To:	Puthigai, Savita
Subject:	Lavorato

John is going to Calgary today and would like to review EnronOnline and the Calgary office.  Can you pull as many reports together as possible relating to their performance and how successful they have been in getting customers online.

Thanks

Louise Kitchen
Chief Operating Officer
Enron Americas
Tel:  713 853 3488
Fax: 713 646 2308


Chris,

The last I left it with Chris and Dave W. was that I was going to compile a list of exactly what data we needed and I will include all the items you indicated.  I do have time this week, but not much because it's bid week.

Mat

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hyde, Chris
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 1:31 PM
To:	Huang, Jason; Smith, Matt
Cc:	Dronet, David; Zhang, Eddie; Pai, Jennie
Subject:	West Desk Power Loads

Jason (et al):

We are approaching somewhat of a slow-down in active harvesting development, and therefore it is a prime opportunity to begin hashing out what is required to gather the West Power load data you have previously mentioned.  We should get together personally to better organize this initiative, but some things to "prime the pump" are:

1)  What are the requisite sites involved?  (URLs, etc)
2)  What is the frequency of "jobs"?  (how often do we scrape the data; once a day, x number of time a day, etc).
3)  What is the nature of the data we are scraping?  (this will help us to determine if we already have a database schema that this will fit into, or if we need to extend/develop one)

These are just some topics to get us started...you may have already answered some/all of these previously, but I feel they deserve mentioning again, if for no other reason than to make sure we are all on the same page moving forward.

Please reply with your availability over the next few days (as well as anyone else you feel should be involved in this effort), and I will have Amanda schedule a meeting/room for us to get this started.

Thanks,
Chris


So nice of you to send a thank you. I am certainly happy to have made
partner. I hope all is well with you and your family. Best wishes for a
wonderful holiday season and a prosperous New Year. Steve

-----Original Message-----
From: James.Derrick@enron.com [mailto:James.Derrick@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 2:52 PM
To: srobinson@velaw.com
Subject: Congratulations!

Steve, I was delighted to receive the news of your being admitted to the
Partnership.  Congratulations!  I'm very proud of you.  All the best.  Jim
          ++++++CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE+++++
The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged.  This
email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization
named above.  If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized
representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any,
or the information contained herein is prohibited.  If you have received
this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email
and delete this email from your system.  Thank You


You goated me into it,

Here goes

400/per

Minn -8
New Orleans -10
Denver -3
Denver-KC under 48
Jack -10
Clev +16
Chic +6 1/2
Indi-Mia under 42
Balt -15

John I would like to sit with you a couple days this week if you'll let me.
I'm very serious about covering you when your out in January.  I would like
to get a sense of what its like dealing with your EOL madness.  Let me know.

Lavo


---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Neal/HOU/ECT on 08/07/2000 01:22 PM
---------------------------

Todd.Neal@chron.com on 08/04/2000 11:43:10 AM
To: holiday@btl.net
cc: sneal@enron.com
Subject: RE: Septe. 7-10,00

I hear you have excellent bone fishing.  We'd like to use light tackle for
lot's of action.

Todd

  -----Original Message-----
  From: Holiday Hotel [mailto:holiday@btl.net]
  Sent: Friday, August 04, 2000 10:14 AM
  To: Todd.Neal@chron.com
  Subject: Septe. 7-10,00

  Dear Mr. Todd Neal,

  There are several fishing guides on the island.  We will
need to know what
  type of fishing you are interested in doing then we can
provide you with a
  contact.

  Definitely no golf course on the island.

  We are looking forward to have you as our guest.

  Sincerely,

  Kim Reyes
  www.SanPedroHoliday.com

  ----- Original Message -----
  From: <Todd.Neal@chron.com>
  To: <holiday@wgs1.btl.net>
  Cc: <sneal@enron.com>
  Sent: Friday, August 04, 2000 7:14 AM
  Subject: RE: Auction Item

  > Ada,
  >
  > Our trip to your wonderful paradise is quickly
approaching.  We can hardly
  > wait.  I still need to make contact with a fishing guide.
I'd love to
  > discuss the possibility of fishing on Friday, 9/8 and
Saturday, 9/9.  Can
  > you help put me in touch with someone?  Also, is there
golf available on
  the
  > island?  If so, how would I make a tee time.  I'll look
forward to hearing
  > from you soon.
  >
  > Thanks,
  >
  > Todd Neal
  >
  > -----Original Message-----
  > From: Holiday Hotel [mailto:holiday@wgs1.btl.net]
  > Sent: Friday, February 18, 2000 9:00 PM
  > To: Todd.Neal@chron.com
  > Subject: RE: Auction Item
  >
  > At 12:18 PM 2/18/2000 -0600, you wrote:
  > >Kim,
  > >
  > >It's been a while since we spoke, but I think I'm ready
to
  > come see you
  > >guys.  I've made tentative flight arrangements for
  > September 7 arriving in
  > >Belize at 1:22 p.m.  My departure time is scheduled for
  > September 10 at 3:30
  > >p.m.  I understand that you will take care of transfers
to
  > San Pedro on
  > >Tropic Air.  How does this work and do you have
  > availability during my
  > >desired times.  Let me know what to do next.
  > >
  > >Thanks for everything.
  > >
  > >Todd Neal
  > >todd.neal@chron.com
  > >
  >
  >
  > Dear Mr. Todd Neal:
  >
  > We have confirmed a room for you in September 07 leaving
the
  > 10,00.
  > Room has a queen size and a twin. We will go ahead and
book
  > you on Tropic
  > Air 2:30 p.m. flight to the island and back on the 10th on
  > the 1:oo p.m.
  >
  > If you should have any questions please feel free to
contact
  > us.
  >
  > Sincerely,
  >
  > Ada Ayuso
  > SAN PEDRO HOLIDAY HOTEL> -----Original
  > Message-----
  > > From: San Pedro Holiday Hotel
  > [mailto:holiday@btl.net]
  > > Sent: Sunday, July 11, 1999 6:03 PM
  > > To: Neal, Todd
  > > Subject: Re: Auction Item
  > >
  > > Dear Mr. Todd Neal,
  > >
  > > We will extend the time period for you.  You
  > can use the
  > >package anytime
  > > between May 1,2000 through October 31, 2000.
  > You will need
  > >to make
  > > reservation prior to your arrival.
  > >
  > > Sincerely,
  > >
  > > Kim
  > >
  > >
  > >
  > > At 06:49 PM 7/6/99 -0500, you wrote:
  > > >Celi,
  > > >
  > > >Hi!  My name is Todd Neal and I was given a
  > vacation
  > >package to your
  > > >wonderful paradise.  The vacation package
  > was purchased as
  > >an auction item
  > > >through Amigos De Las Americas in January.
  > Unfortunately,
  > >I was just given
  > > >the item in the last few weeks and I'm of
  > the understanding
  > >it is only
  > > >available through Dec. 15.  There are also
  > block out dates
  > >from Nov. 20 -
  > > >Nov. 26.  Unfortunately do to several
  > personal and
  > >professional obligations,
  > > >I will be unable to use the package under
  > the current
  > >timeframe.  I am,
  > > >however, seeking an exception because I
  > would really like
  > >to visit your
  > > >wonderful hotel.  I'm hopeful that you will
  > consider
  > >extending the timeframe
  > > >through December 15, 2000.  Your
  > consideration would be
  > >greatly appreciated.
  > > >I'm looking forward to hearing from your
  > real soon.
  > > >
  > > >Thanks again,
  > > >
  > > >Todd Neal
  > > >todd.neal@chron.com
  > > >
  > >
  > >Attachment Converted: "C:\PROGRAM
  > FILES\INTERNET\EUDORA\Attach\RE Auction
  > Item"
  > >
  >


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT on 03/15/2001
12:38 PM ---------------------------

Andrew_M_Ozuna@bankone.com on 03/15/2001 10:06:15 AM
To: Phillip.K.Allen@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Sagewood M/F

(See attached file: outline.doc)

(See attached file: MAPTTRA.xls)

(Sample checklist of items needed for closing.  We have received some of the
items to date)

(See attached file: Checklist.doc)

 - outline.doc
 - MAPTTRA.xls
 - Checklist.doc


This spreadsheet corrects the graph in the previously submitted spreadsheet,
removing the last two data points.
Data is only through June 2000, and the graph incorrectly also showed the
average numbers as if they were numbers for July and August 2000.

---------------------- Forwarded by Arvel Martin/HOU/ECT on 07/25/2000 04:47
PM ---------------------------

Arvel Martin
07/25/2000 03:43 PM
To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Joan M Quick/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Crescendo Pressure Data

The attached is a monthy table w/ a summary of line pressures and production.
Take a look and see if this is what you need.
Notice the sheet called "Summary by month and average", especially the last
few columns with averages calculated.

Remember, most of the Entrada Production went off-line beginning in 1998,
with final production in August 99.
Call me @ 3-1888 if we need to discuss.
Arvel


Attached please find the legal risk memo concerning the Power Sale Agreement
between Enron Power Marketing, Inc. and DeAcero, S.A. de C.V.

Please note that this memo addresses only issues arising out of the Power
Sale Agreement and Mexico-related risks.  It does not address risks arising
out of regulatory or other matters in the United States.

Should you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact
me.


----- Forwarded by Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron on 07/02/2001 09:03 AM -----

	Margaret Allen
	07/02/2001 07:30 AM

		 To: Steve Kean
		 cc: Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: GENIE Documents

Hi Steve,

For some awful reason, this did not make it to you on Friday afternoon when I
sent it.  Hopefully it finds you this time!

I received your agenda changes, but I would appreciate you looking over the
steering committee when you have a chance.

Thanks for your time, MSA

----- Forwarded by Margaret Allen/Corp/Enron on 07/02/2001 07:28 AM -----

Delivery Failure Report
Your document:	GENIE Documents
was not delivered to:	Steve Kean
because:	Error transferring to MAILMAN.ENRON.COM; SMTP Protocol Returned a
Permanent Error 550 5.1.1 <Steve.Kean@enron.com>... User unknown

What should you do?
You can resend the undeliverable document to the recipients listed above by
choosing the Resend button or the Resend command on the Actions menu.
Once you have resent the document you may delete this Delivery Failure Report.
If resending the document is not successful you will receive a new failure
report.
Unless you receive other Delivery Failure Reports, the document was
successfully delivered to all other recipients.

NAHOU-LNMAI16/Enron, NAHOU-LNMAI16/Enron

	To:	Steve Kean

	cc:	Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Dennis
Vegas/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

	Date:	06/29/2001 04:22:16 PM

	Subject:	GENIE Documents

Hi Steve,

I have attached the steering committee and agenda for review. Mark has made
significant changes to both documents, so your input would be appreciated.
Please narrow the steering committee list down to around 30.  For the agenda,
please focus on content and not timing (since the dates changed per our
conversation).

Your feedback is needed as soon as possible.  Our goal is to send invitations
to speakers and steering committee members within the next week.

Thank you for your time! Have a good weekend, Margaret


Stephanie, Carr have come back to me and say they have some kind of contract with Enron Capital and Trade International but the person I spoke to needs managerial approval to send me a copy.
The manager is my normal contact so will hopefully be able to get a copy tomorrow...

regards

James

-----Original Message-----
From: Panus, Stephanie
Sent: 20 November 2001 16:34
To: Canney, James
Subject: FW: Carr Futures

James,
Can you confirm whether or not ECTRIC has a futures agreement with Carr Futures and what the date of such agreement is?  We need to provide Carr with an Enron Corp. Guaranty.

Thanks,
Stephanie Panus
Senior Legal Specialist
Enron Wholesale Services
1400 Smith Street, EB3803C
Houston, Texas  77002
ph:  713.345.3249
fax:  713.646.3490
email:  stephanie.panus@enron.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Horn, Cindy
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 10:32 AM
To: Glover, Sheila; Panus, Stephanie
Cc: Hall, D. Todd
Subject: RE: Carr Futures

Please talk to James Canney as he works with Carr daily.  There should be an ECTRIC agreement but have never seen it so....
Thanks Cindy

-----Original Message-----
From: Glover, Sheila
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 3:58 PM
To: Panus, Stephanie
Cc: Hall, D. Todd; Horn, Cindy
Subject: RE: Carr Futures

Stephanie,
Todd or Cindy may be able to help you. Todd and Cindy: Do you know if ECTRIC has an agreement with CARR Futures?
Sheila

-----Original Message-----
From: Panus, Stephanie
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 9:55 AM
To: Glover, Sheila
Subject: FW: Carr Futures

Sheila,
Do you know who in London works on futures/brokerage agreements?  I'm trying to find out if ECTRIC has an agreement with Carr.

-----Original Message-----
From: Shackleton, Sara
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 5:42 PM
To: Panus, Stephanie
Subject: FW: Carr Futures

Stephanie:

Scroll all the way down to Sheila's original message for contact person and the two Enron companies being guaranteed.  You will need to verify with London that ECTRIC has a futures agreement with Carr (maybe you can get a copy of it for our records).  Can you prepare a draft guaranty and ask Tanya for a cap.  Thanks.  Sara

-----Original Message-----
From: Glover, Sheila
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 5:33 PM
To: Rohauer, Tanya; Shackleton, Sara
Subject: RE: Carr Futures

Pls see me original e-mail below.
sg

-----Original Message-----
From: Rohauer, Tanya
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 5:24 PM
To: Shackleton, Sara; Glover, Sheila
Subject: FW: Carr Futures

I assume the parties are  ENA and ECTRIC with Carr Futures, Inc. I do not have any information about this though nor do I have a contact.  Sheila can you provide this information to Sara?

-----Original Message-----
From: Shackleton, Sara
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 4:37 PM
To: Rohauer, Tanya
Cc: Panus, Stephanie
Subject: FW: Carr Futures

Tanya:  Just let us know the parties and guaranty cap.  I am not familiary with any Carr arrangements other than the ENA futures agreement.  Also, do you have a contact at Carr?

Thanks.  Sara

-----Original Message-----
From: Kitchen, Louise
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 2:42 PM
To: Rohauer, Tanya; Shackleton, Sara; Bradford, William S.
Subject: RE: Carr Futures

No objections

-----Original Message-----
From: Rohauer, Tanya
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 12:51 PM
To: Shackleton, Sara; Bradford, William S.; Kitchen, Louise
Subject: FW: Carr Futures
Importance: High

Are there any objections to issuing the gty? We just did the same thing last week for FIMAT Issuing seems the simplest rather than having to stop trading, although traditionally we have not issued corp gtys.  Please advise.

Tanya

-----Original Message-----
From: Glover, Sheila
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 11:28 AM
To: Rohauer, Tanya
Cc: Su, Ellen
Subject: Carr Futures
Importance: High

Tanya,
I received a call from Carr Futures this morning.  Their parent, Cr?dit Agricole Indosuez, is requesting a parent guanantee to continue trading with Enron North America Corp. and Enron Capital and Trade Resources International.

I spoke with Gary this morning and he said that we could stop trading with them.  I said that others do trade with Carr.  He suggested then that the energy guys can proceed if they wish to continue trading with Carr.

Rick Farina, 312-441-4420, called me with Larry Anderson and Patty Chambers.

How do you want to proceed?

Sheila


Jane:
Here is the answer to the Wheatland question.  I am currently tracking down
the answer to the Gleason question, which I should have very shortly.
Ben


Thought you may be interested in this as well...

 -----Original Appointment-----
From: 	Nat, Steve
Sent:	Monday, January 28, 2002 9:01 PM
To:	Baughman Jr., Don; Burnett, Lisa; Day, Smith L.; Miller, Jeffrey; Choate, Jason; Hanse, Patrick; Bentley, Corry; Bailey, Debra; Will, Lloyd; Benson, Robert; Davis, Mark Dana; Sturm, Fletcher J.; Poston, David; Luu, Duong; Nat, Steve; Balasundaram, Arun; Lee, Norman
Subject:	Power Trading Systems Requirements
When:	Tuesday, January 29, 2002 1:00 PM-2:30 PM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada).
Where:	ECS6980

As promised, please find the attached agenda for our follow-up meeting regarding CPM and additional P&L requirements.  See you at 1:00...

Steve


Please see the attached articles by Robert Michaels, who works with Richard
Tabors:


Meeting of Insurance Law Section
Four Seasons Hotel - Austin
Room: San Jacinto West
June 14, 2001

The Insurance Law Section would like to personally invite you to attend the
Insurance Law Section meeting and the free CLE which will be presented next
Thursday, June 14, 2001 at the State Bar convention in Austin.

On June 14, 2001, the Insurance Law Section will hold its annual meeting and
sponsor its annual 3 hour CLE program at the Four Season's Hotel. As usual,
Council members and Committee chairs will be elected  by the Section members
at the annual meeting. The schedule for the meeting and the CLE program is
set out below. We hope that you can attend the annual meeting and the CLE
presentations.

1:30 PM to 2:00 PM - - annual section meeting and election of Council members

2:00 PM to 5:00 PM  FREE   CLE program

2 p.m. - 3 p.m.
Insurance Declaratory Judgment Actions
Topic: This panel will consider declaratory judgment actions regarding
insurance coverage. When should they be filed? Who should file them? What
discovery is necessary and appropriate? Can they usually be resolved by
summary judgment? How should these cases be tried? What is the proper role of
the expert? What is the proper role of the jury? What are the appellate
twists?

Comment: The Supreme Court of Texas has repeatedly suggested that insurers
and insureds alike put this procedural device to more use.

Panelists:
Mike Huddleston
Karen Keltz
Rusty McMains
Claudia Volaire
Beth Bradley
Stephen Walraven

3 p.m.- 4 p.m.

When Negligence Blindly Assists Deliberateness

Topic: Suppose Mr. Sleeze Ball sets out to kill his business partner, Cheese
Square. Suppose further that Mrs. Ball helps Sleeze in various ways which
turn out to be necessary. Suppose further that Mrs. Ball does not realize
what Sleeze is up to and does not foresee the consequences of her actions.
Finally, suppose Sleeze is convicted of murder and then a wrongful death
action is brought by Cheesey's family (Swiss, Cheddar, and the rest) against
both Mr. and Mrs. Ball, and their dog Astral. Naturally the Balls have
homeowner's coverage and Mrs. Ball wants a defense. Question: Should she get
it?

Comment: This is a burning issue in contemporary liability insurance law, and
a great deal turns on it. Plaintiff's personal injuries lawyers take note.

Debaters:
Michael Sean Quinn - Affirmative
Christopher Martin - Negative

4 p.m. - 5:00 p.m.

Insurance Defense Guidelines

Topic: Many liability insurers have attempted to issue guidelines and rules
to govern the ways in which defense lawyers may conduct defenses. Often, if
the activities of defense counsel do not conform to these guidelines defense
counsel do not get paid. Recently the Texas legislature outlawed these
guidelines, or at least some of them. Is this law a good idea, or a bad one?
Will it be effective? Will it be enforced? Is it really in the interest of
insureds who are defendants in law suits or is it designed to help lawyers?

Panelists:
Charles Levy
Roland Leon
Clark Richards

Format: Audience participation on all of these topics is welcomed.
It is positively encouraged, not that it could be stopped anyway.

We hope to see you there next week.

James L. Cornell
tel: 713 547 2231
fax: 713 236 5583
cornellj@haynesboone.com


CC,

Do you still have the contact info for the escrow agent?  If so, it would be
great it you would contact them directly.

The turbine contract is going back and forth between us and GE.  I expect
that it may well be ready tomorrow.

I expect the Enron opinion letter to be an issue.

Kay

"Campbell, Carolyn" <CCampbell@KSLAW.com> on 04/09/2001 04:21:35 PM
To: "'kay.mann@enron.com'" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc: "Keffer, John" <JKeffer@KSLAW.com>

Subject: Delta Timetable

Kay:

Note the following timetable from the final version of the ENA/PPL letter
agreement:

(1)  ENA agreed to use commercially reasonable efforts to deliver the final
form of the turbine contract on or before April 11, 2001.
(2)  The parties agreed to commercially reasonable efforts to execute an
escrow agreement on or before April 16, 2001.
(3)  The escrow account must be funded 3 business days after the later of
(a) ENA's delivery of the final form of the turbine contract and (b) the
closing of PPL's financing.
(4)  ENA can terminate if the escrow is not funded on or before April 19,
2001 (but this date gets pushed back by one business day for each business
day beyond April 11, 2001 that ENA delivers the final form of the turbine
contract).
(5)  The closing occurs at least 5, but not later than 10, business days
after funding the escrow account.
(6)  Either party may terminate if the closing has not occurred on or before
May 3, 2001.

If ENA delivers the final form of the turbine contract on April 11, 2001,
then the April 19, 2001 right to terminate stands.  PPL's obligation to fund
the escrow would then be determined by the date of its loan closing.  Greg
Lang advises that they are working on PPL's financing, but he did not give
an estimated date for financial closing.

I advised Greg on Friday that the legal opinions from both GE and Enron were
causing heartburn.  He agreed to pass this along to Isabel Parker.  He asked
today about GE's reaction to the consent document and if it would be
appropriate for Isabel Parker to contact GE directly at this point.  He also
requested a draft of the escrow disbursement instructions.  When you get a
chance, please advise of any comments in order that we can circulate for
PPL's review.  Also, we need to contact Citibank to clear the proposed form
of escrow agreement (and the anticipated disbursement instructions) and to
negotiate the fee.  Let me know if we can assist in this regard.  Thanks.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King & Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com>

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.


Hi Folks,
?
I'll?have the full blown matchups very late  tonight / Friday morning but for
you last minute waiver wire watchers, here's  something you might be
interested in:? Chris Warren might be worth a shot  as the Eagles have signed
him as anticipated according to the AP.? Full  article is below.? I'm betting
he's still got something left in the  tank.? I'm also betting coach Andy Reid
is smart enough to figure a way for  him to contribute in some fashion.
McNabb is not a QB that must be overly  protected so the fact Warren may not
know all the pass protection blocks isn't  quite as critical as it normally
is.? He could be worth a  shot.
?
See you Friday morning,
?
Joe
?
?
?
?
From the article: http://www.usatoday.com/sports/nfl/eagles/thurs.htm?  The
Philadelphia  Eagles have said for weeks that they're not looking ahead to
the NFL playoffs.  But by adding recently waived running back Chris Warren on
Thursday, the Eagles  may be thinking about what they need to succeed if they
reach the postseason.  The Eagles claimed Warren one day after he was waived
by the Dallas Cowboys.

Warren, in his 11th NFL season,  will join the Eagles for Friday's practice
and will be available Sunday against  the Cleveland Browns.

''He's been in the league 11 years and at one  point he was one of the best
backs in the game,'' Eagles head coach Andy Reid  said. ''Is he that now? I
don't know. But he's a big back who has played well  this season.''

In Dallas this season, Warren rushed for 254 yards and  two touchdowns and
averaged 4.3 yards per carry He also caught 31 passes for 302  yards and a
touchdown.

But in last Sunday's loss to Tampa Bay, Warren  misplayed a pass that
deflected off his hands and was intercepted and returned  for a touchdown. He
was benched after that play, and then was involved in a  shouting match with
a Dallas coach on the sideline.

Three days later, he  was waived. Dallas owner Jerry Jones said Warren
''wasn't in the plans moving  forward,'' but Warren said he was cut because
he wouldn't accept a one-year  contract extension for 2001 at his current
salary, $715,000.

Now Warren  is an Eagle. Philadelphia is looking to add a spark to a running
game that has  been struggling since the season-ending injury to running back
Duce Staley in  October.

The running-back-by-committee group of Darnell Autry, Stanley  Pritchett and
Brian Mitchell has averaged less than 3 yards per carry in the  last four
games. Philadelphia, 9-5 and needing just one win in games against  Cleveland
and Cincinnati to make the playoffs for the first time since 1996, has
relied on quarterback Donovan McNabb almost exclusively to make the offense
go.

McNabb is averaging nearly 75% of the team's total offensive output.

Warren began his NFL career in Seattle and ran for more than 1,000 yards  in
four consecutive seasons, 1992-95. He made three Pro Bowls during that time.

Seattle's career leading ground gainer, Warren has 7,654 yards rushing  in
his career, which began in 1990.

Warren signed with Dallas as an  unrestricted free agent prior to the 1998
season. He has been a backup behind  Emmitt Smith the last three seasons.

To make room on the active roster,  the Eagles waived wide receiver Alex Van
Dyke.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
cheatsheets-unsubscribe@egroups.com


Hi Professor Ronn:

I have ordered a flip chart and markers and an overhead projector.

There were 11 pages in your presentation and they look fine.  We have
already made the copies.

I believe everything is set - if you think of anything else, please let me
know.

Enjoy your dinner tonight and we will see you tomorrow.

Regards,

Shirley Crenshaw

"Ehud I. Ronn" <eronn@mail.utexas.edu> on 06/21/2000 02:03:03 PM
To: Shirley.Crenshaw@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Re: Prospective 6/22 Houston Visit

Shirley:

>Please let me know if you need
>anything else.
There is one additional item I would request:  If the room does not contain
a blackboard or whiteboard, I would appreciate a flip chart and markers.

I am faxing you my Presentation Handout for tomorrow.  I would be grateful
if your produced copies in sufficient number for tomorrow's 11:30 a.m.
meeting; Vince advises me the number of attendees will be in the 25 - 30
range.  I will also bring along a "master copy" in case the trasmission
unduly mangles the fax.

Thanks,
Ehud

==============================================
     Ehud I. Ronn
     Department of Finance
     McCombs School of Business
     University of Texas at Austin
     Austin, TX. 78712-1179
     Voice:  (512) 471-5853
      FAX:   (512) 471-5073
      Internet:  eronn@mail.utexas.edu
=================================================


As discussed, please see attached sample agreements.

Regards,
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


I would like to come to discuss several issues that I have outlined in the
accompanying
attachment.


PRM handles the transmission for Benton County, Franklin County, Richland,
and Gray's Harbor.  If you ever need to use our take-or-pay transmission or
otherwise need to schedule this transmission, PRM needs to be notified.
Their day number is 425-462-9517 and their cell (for after hours) is
425-417-9517.

Thanks, Donald.


RIGZONE DAILY NEWS -- WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 16, 2002
------------------------------------------------------------
Daily News from the worldwide upstream oil & gas industry
   to view the complete version, please go to:
   http://www.rigzone.com/newsletter_show.asp?n_id=201
------------------------------------------------------------


Steve -- here's the schedule for Thursday:

 8-9 a.m. CEO Meeting at Sun w/ Northern California CEOs - Santa Clara
 3:30 p.m. Meeting w/ Mayor Riordan - LA
 4:15 p.m. Meeting w/ other LA CEOs

I've attached the invitations for both meetings, as well as the invitation
lists (Riordan has added some names to the LA list).  Given the extensive
logistics, I'm planning on going with Ken -- do you think Jeff Dasovich
should come also?  Jeff and I are working on a handout presentation (about
10-15 power point slides) for Ken to use during the meeting.

What do you think about sending the information Jeff prepared for McNealy to
the CEOs in advance of the meeting so that they have something to think about
before they arrive for the discussion?

Ken needs to meet with the UC Chancellor while he's in LA (probably around
lunchtime), but are there any other meetings you think he should have while
he's in California?

For a briefing package, I'm putting together info (bios, company info) on all
the CEOs who will be attending the meetings.  Is there anything else we need
to prepare for Ken?

Hurry back -- we miss you!
kd