what is this???

	From:  Jennifer Fraser                           12/27/2000 12:19 PM

To: Bill Berkeland/Corp/Enron@Enron, John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer
Shipos/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: NG YEAR ENd Quiz

---------------------- Forwarded by Jennifer Fraser/HOU/ECT on 27/12/2000
18:21 ---------------------------

RBrown5658@aol.com@wwwww.aescon.com on 27/12/2000 12:04:03
Supplemental Bonus question: See no 12---- Is Jeff Shankman's picture there

Here is your year end NG quiz.  Forgive pore spelling please!

1.   On Jan 4, 2000, what was the settle price of the prompt month Nymex
contract?

2.   What caused numerous OTC energy brokerages to consolidate or go out of
business in 2000?

3.   Every 11 years, an astronomical event occurs that correlates with high
energy prics.  This is one of those years.  What is the event?

4.   What trading company's motto is "unrelenting thinking?"

5.   What is intellectual capital?  Where was the idea of it conceived?

6.   If a supertrader is wearing a blue shirt with white collar and cuffs,
what is the appropriate foot accesory:  red socks, sandals or "spats"?

7.   On March 31, 2000, what was the settle of the prompt month Nymex
contract?

8.   What is the name of a prominent national weather service that doesn't
provide intra-day Canadian air temp graphics?

9.   What is a "polar pig"?   Who coined the phrase?

10.  What do Nicholas Leeson and Value-at-Risk have in common?

11.  What type of food is served at the restaurant in Houston which houses
the famous bar - "Club No Minors"?

12.  What is the name of the small town in Texas where the Natural Gas
Traders Hall of Fame is allegedly located?

13.  What is the name of the $1.59 grocery store tabloid that predicted our
current weather on Sept. 12, 2000?

14.  What are the names of the three northern hemisphere weather models used
today?

15.  In the year 2000, what astrological event had a 100% correlation with
counter-trend price moves?

16.  On Feb 3, 2001, what astrological event will occur that some floor
traders say will affect price of NG?

17.  In the year 2000, one Houston oil company paid $160 million to learn the
hard way that OPEC can do what?

18.  What was the highest IFGMR index posted to date?

19.  What city issued warrants for the arrest of several of its gas utility's
executives in 2000?

20.  Who is the president of Enron Online?

21.  During 2000's Shell Open golf tourney, within a 25 cent window what was
the average price of the prompt month Nymex contract?

22.  What weather event struck Ft. Worth, Texas on March 28, 2000?

23.  How many Nobel laureates advised the supertraders at failed Long Term
Capital Management?

24.  What is a "deal cop"?

25.  The AGA states upon its web page that portion of the gas business that
it represents.  Which of the following is that group? Traders, marketers,
pipelines, utilities, home consumers, producers, industrials?

26.  What type of meat product was used to verbally describe AGA's Chris
McGill's reaction to the notion that there would be a shortage of gas supply
this winter?

27.  How many utilities have been rumored to be considering bankruptcy in
California due to high energy prices?

28.  The original design for Alliance pipeline was conceived where and drawn
on what?

29.  Which of the following is considered to be improper to put on a
Philadelphia Gas Works expense account: business mileage, business meals,
business lodging or artworks?

30.  At a late night industry party during Gas Fair this year, two female
brokers were mistakenly hassled by Houston Police as possibly being of what
occupation?


---------------------- Forwarded by Jane M Tholt/HOU/ECT on 12/15/2000 02:03
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Rebecca W Cantrell                           12/13/2000 04:22 PM

To: Stephanie Miller/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ruth Concannon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jane M
Tholt/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tori Kuykendall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Timothy J Hamilton/HOU/EES@EES, Robert
Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna Greif/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Julie A Gomez/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Final Filed Version -- SDG&E Comments

FYI.
---------------------- Forwarded by Rebecca W Cantrell/HOU/ECT on 12/13/2000
04:18 PM ---------------------------

"Randall Rich" <rrich@bracepatt.com> on 12/13/2000 04:13:55 PM
To: "Jeffrey Watkiss" <dwatkiss@bracepatt.com>, <jhartso@enron.com>,
<jsteffe@enron.com>, <llawner@enron.com>, <rebecca.w.cantrell@enron.com>,
<Richard.b.sanders@enron.com>, <snovose@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Final Filed Version

The filed version of the comments in the San Diego Gas & Electric matter at
FERC is attached.

 - SANDIEGO.DOC


Please be informed that I will not be attending tomorrow's activities @ 2pm.
However,  I will be here until my regular time taking advantage of this
opportunity to begin archiving.

Thanks
Dana


Kate, Fischer deal , apb says dp should be 4 Corners 345kv
THanks


He's re-trading on the retainage.  Let's discuss.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 01/04/2001 03:11
PM ---------------------------

michael.o.sandridge@us.abb.com on 01/04/2001 01:42:58 PM
To: ben.jacoby@enron.com, Kay.mann@enron.com
cc: david.onuscheck@us.abb.com, karla.hesketh@us.abb.com

Subject: Contract comments

Ben/Kay,
After reviewing the contract with Dave we found only a couple of points that
we
would like to mention;
1) 1.48 the Maximum Liability Amount should be $768,000 USD
2) The unit will not be delivered until the last 10% (ten percent) retention
is
paid and we will post the surety bond as shown in in Exhibit D
3) ABB would not buy back the unit except from Enron.

Please let me know if there is any way that we may further assist you.

MIKE


Here is a list of items we would like to keep in the NETCO for LTSW and LTNW books

All the files we need are found in M:\Electric\West\Analysis\LTWestTrade

Thanks

Driscoll, Swerzbin, and Motley


sure.


If the receivable is for ENA, it will have to be settled separately.  Andy
Ring talks to Koch for day trading.  Maybe she could pursue this.

Susan Pereira

Leslie Robinson@ENRON
10/30/2000 08:18 AM
To: Susan W Pereira/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Koch Energy Trading

I apologize for taking so long to respond.  I was out of the office Thursday
and Friday.  They are receivables for us.

Susan W Pereira@ECT
10/26/2000 08:25 AM
To: Leslie Robinson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Koch Energy Trading

Is this a receivable for LRC or Enron?

Leslie Robinson@ENRON
10/25/2000 06:12 PM
To: Susan W Pereira/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Koch Energy Trading

While doing my Accounts Receivable research, I came across two outstanding
invoice for Koch Enregy totally $2,934.60 from 1997.  Is it too late to
recoup the money via the settlement agreement?


We have received the executed Confidentiality Agreement with the referenced
counterparty dated May 11, 2000.   A copy will be sent to Dave Samuels.


OK.  Having taken a second look at the spreadsheet I sent yesterday, here's a
revised sheet (there was a math error in the original), and my adds to Kim's
#4.  Most significant issue:  the discrepancy between Kim's and mine is that
Kim's assumes that the $9,5 million includes pluses from things like dep/gain
on sale, while mine assumes that it doesn't (i.e., Kim subtracts them, I add
them).  No big deal, we just need to make an assumption and go with it.
There's a couple of other differences that are identified in the answer to
#4--again, just need to make the call either way.

Best,
Jeff


Wednesday works for me.  Morning would be a good time for me.

	Audrey O'Neil
	10/23/2000 01:58 PM

		 To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: OE Term Sheet

Gerald-

I have the Lost Creek Members Meeting tomorrow.  What's your schedule later
in the week?  Are we busy people, or what?

Take Care,

Audrey


Hello everyone,

I am writing to confirm your participation in the RFF Council & Board of
Directors meetings on Wednesday, October 10 and Thursday, October 11,
respectively. In light of the events of September 11 and subsequent
travel difficulties, we thought we'd double check with our out-of-town
Directors on their attendance. We hope you are still able to join us.

If your plans have changed in any way, please let me know at your
earliest convenience. We look forward to seeing you!

Regards,
Susan

--------------------------------------
Susan Johnson Doyle
Stewardship Coordinator
Resources for the Future
1616 P Street, NW
Washington, DC  20036
doyle@rff.org
(202) 328-5038 (v)
(202) 939-3460 (f)


- dasovich.rl.ca.1-25-01.doc


Please see attached.

Michelle Lawless
Enron Litigation Unit
Tel:  (713) 853-6298
Fax:  (713) 853-6576


Start Date: 3/10/01; HourAhead hour: 1;  HourAhead schedule download failed.
Manual intervention required.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001031001.txt
!!!General SQL error.
Couldn't update; currently locked by user 'admin' on machine 'ECTHOU-BPS4'.
Table
!!!A user transaction is already in progress.
!!!A user transaction is already in progress.
!!!A user transaction is already in progress.
!!!A user transaction is already in progress.
!!!A user transaction is already in progress.
!!!A user transaction is already in progress.
!!!A user transaction is already in progress.
!!!A user transaction is already in progress.
!!!A user transaction is already in progress.
!!!A user transaction is already in progress.
!!!A user transaction is already in progress.
!!!A user transaction is already in progress.
!!!A user transaction is already in progress.
!!!A user transaction is already in progress.


Two pretty key issues, PG&E is already starting to get the machine humming:

1.  Dec 4, Meeting on RSP
2.  Dec 5, Rule 22/OCC, Petition to Modify PX Credit for Consolidated
Billing

---------------------- Forwarded by Mona L Petrochko/NA/Enron on 11/30/2000
06:11 PM ---------------------------

Rebecca Schlanert <RSchlanert@electric.com> on 11/30/2000 06:02:18 PM

To:   "'arm@phaser.com'" <arm@phaser.com>
cc:

Subject:  Rule 22/OCC December 5 Agenda AND PG&E RSP Meeting Info

I thought it might clear up any confusion if everyone could had the Rule
22/OCC meeting agenda (the last minute addition is shown first), AND the
information sent out by PG&E concerning their RSP meeting Monday 12/4 @
1:00.  Please see below....

> New item for Rule 22/OCC December 5 Agenda (attached):
> 1.  PG&E will provide an overview of its recently filed Petition to
Modify
> D.97-10-087
>
>
>
>  <<AgendaRULE22_December5_2000.doc>>               <<RateStabil Plan
> PTERFiling.doc>>

(See attached file: AgendaRULE22_December5_2000.doc)
(See attached file: RateStabil Plan PTERFiling.doc)

 - AgendaRULE22_December5_2000.doc
 - RateStabil Plan PTERFiling.doc


Ben

Attached is nominal performance for 6 LM6000 and 75 MW STG at Homestead. I am
getting about 8175 Btu/kWhr HHV net plant heat rate (does include GE/S&S
margin) at about 348 MW net plant output.

Bruce


Hahaha.  That was pretty funny.  I have a feeling that's the reaction my
grandmothers will actually have.


Shall I handle items #1 and 2?

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 10/23/2000 08:53
AM ---------------------------
From: Roseann Engeldorf on 10/23/2000 08:52 AM
To: Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Lisa Bills/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Brenda L
Funk/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: CSFB Financing - NA power projects

Sheila, as I mentioned in my voice mail, there are a couple of items I need
to follow up with you on:

1. Turbine Purchase Agreements - diligence item for the bank.  I have most of
these, I think.  I can check with Kay to develop a list of these and get them
copied for the bank.  I think I can get some out the door this evening -
Millbank is very anxious to see them.

2. Project LLCs - Millbank would like a list of these and a set of formation
and/or operating docs. for each of them.

3. Developer as EWG - the bank has asked if the Developer could/should have
this designation by the mid-November close.   I don't know if EWG is a
plant/project specific designation or if it is "personal" to the entity
applying for it.  Could you let us know?

4. Mortgages on site land - the bank is proposing that we give a 60-day
negative pledge while we prepare a mortgage in the bank's favor on the real
property in connection with a project site.  Is 60 days reasonable?

Thanks,

Rose


Tanya:  Yes, there is an outstanding issue.  Please read the attached and let
me know when you'd like to discuss.  Thanks.  Sara
---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 05/01/2000
12:09 PM ---------------------------

Sara Shackleton
04/21/2000 09:04 AM
To: Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Susan Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Cargill, Incorporated

Tanya:  I left you a voice mail earlier this week on the single outstanding
issue:  paragraph (B) of our setoff language.  This provision allows the
nondefaulting party to withhold any payment it might owe to the defaulting
party under the master until the nondefaulting party can be certain IN ITS
REASONABLE DISCRETION  that ANY other payments owed to it (under ANY other
agreements between the parties)  by the defaulting party have been paid.
Cargill does not want to "comingle" its business.  Remember, we have already
given in on "affiliate setoff".  [the lawyer never raised the paragraph (B)
issue until this week!]

Also, Cargill has requested that we change our Credit Support Amount
definition (but I provided them with an explanation) AND Cargill has decided
to issue transferable L/C's.

Please let me hear from you so that we can finalize.  I do not know if this
is a deal breaker.


It's been changed.

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
02/16/2001 02:12 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject:

deal 523883
Please ch term to 2/17 only.

Thanks!


yeah.  we can rent a hobie boat and go sailing


Please prepare a Monthly Legal Report for your group for October and submit
it to me as soon as possible.  Attached is the ENW Monthly Legal Report to
use as a guide.  The report should be concise, in bullet format, and
submitted to me via e-mail by the 15th of each month.


---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 12/19/2000 08:31 AM
---------------------------

Alan Comnes
12/18/2000 04:58 PM
To: Mary Hain/HOU/ECT, paul.kaufman@enron.com
cc: tbelden@enron.com, smara@enron.com, bob.badeer@enron.com,
greg.wolfe@enron.com, steve hall@enron
Subject: Re: Summary of FERC's 12- 15 order on California Markets

The following are  some  notes and questions regarding FERC's December 15
Order intended to supplement Mary's notes distributed over the weekend.

1. Penalty on Underscheduled Load

a. Penalty threshold

The FERC stood by its Nov 1 recommendation to impose a penalty on all SC's
that underschedule by more than 5%.  The only change relative to November 1
is that the FERC will allow SC's with loads 200 MW or less to have up to 10
MW imbalance without penalty.  EPMI as a power marketer, has a highly
variable load, I assume.  Do we need to seek clarification from FERC or ISO
on how ISO will measure the load (annual average, annual peak, monthly peak?)
used to determine whether the applicable penalty threshold  is 10 MW or 5%?
Guidance from traders would be appreciated.

b. Estimated bills
FERC allows the ISO to implement a blended "automated/manual" process to
implement the ISO's load imbalance penalty.  To simplify the settlement
process, the ISO is allowed to institute estimated billing procedures on a
temporary basis.  Does EPMI have a serious problem with being billed on an
estimated basis?

2. Documenting Incremental Seller Costs, Including Opportunity Costs

The FERC order raises important issues with regard to documenting our costs,
which will be required on all sales to the ISO or PX effective on 1/1/01.  In
its discussion of the $150/MWh breakpoint, FERC states: "In recognition of
the unworkable complexities that the opportunity cost concept introduces in
the ISO real-time imbalance market, we will eliminate it."  Enron will
undoubtedly raise the impermissibility of opportunity costs in its rehearing
request.  Among other things, EPMI will  argue that opportunity costs are a
legitimate economic cost, that such costs are used in transmission pricing,
and that without such costs the FERC is essentially taking
generator/marketers back to cost-of-service ratemaking

This being said, EPMI must operate without the benefit of using opportunity
costs as a basis for documenting above-$150/MWh accepted bids effective
1/1/01.

As noted in the list of information that must be reported by Enron (see
Mary's summary or p. 59 of the FERC order), sellers that have not generated
their own power can report "purchase price".  Is West Trading prepared to
document every above-$150/MWh sale to the ISO or PX with an associated
"purchase price?"  In addition, other costs that clearly apply to a
marketer--such as transmission access costs, transmission losses, expected
replacement power costs, start-up/no-load costs--are not allowed on the
list.  (We should not the omission of these costs in our petition for
rehearing.)

In several places in the order, the Commission states that sellers should be
allowed to earn reasonable profits but little guidance is given.  The only
concrete guidance I found was in Massey's concurring opinion which identified
$25/MWh as a "reasonable capacity adder."

Accepted bids below $150/MWh do not require documentation.  The preliminary
opinion from our discussion today was that such bids are in a &safe harbor8
zone and it appears that refund risk on such transactions is much less.


each period from ,and including, one Valuation Date to, but excluding the
next following applicable Valuation Date during the Term of the Transaction,
except that (a) the initial Calculation Period will commence on, and include,
January 17, 2001 and (b) the final Calculation Period will end on, but
exclude, the Termination Date.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


Kay Young will be out of the office on Monday and Tuesday, March 6 and 7.  If
you need conflicts checks done please contact one of the following people:

Ed Hearn
Mary Heinitz
Deb Korkmas
Dina Snow

Thank you.


These are the current drafts, not the ones I sent earlier.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/12/2001 02:58
PM ---------------------------

"Reuter, Marisa" <MReuter@KSLAW.com> on 04/11/2001 08:27:55 PM
To: "'JeremiahDeberry@paulhastings.com'" <JeremiahDeberry@paulhastings.com>,
"'Michael.Young@northwestern.com'" <Michael.Young@northwestern.com>,
"'MargueriteKahn@paulhastings.com'" <MargueriteKahn@paulhastings.com>
cc: "'Chris.Booth@enron.com'" <Chris.Booth@enron.com>,
"'Ben.Jacoby@enron.com'" <Ben.Jacoby@enron.com>, "'Kay.Mann@enron.com'"
<Kay.Mann@enron.com>, "Keffer, John" <JKeffer@KSLAW.com>

Subject: ENA/NorthWestern: Revised Letter Agreement and Exhibits

I am attaching for your review marked and clean copies of the following
documents:

1. Letter Agreement between Enron North America Corp. and NorthWestern
Generation I, LLC;
2. ENA Promissory Note (Exhibit A);
3. First Amended and Restated LLC Agreement (Exhibit C);
4. Escrow Agreement (Exhibit F); and
5. ENA Guaranty (Exhibit G).

In addition, I am attaching a preliminary draft of Enron's form of
Assignment and Assumption Agreement (Exhibit B) with the caveat that the
document remains subject to changes pending further review by Enron.  Please
note that I am not attaching (1) a copy of the GE Guaranty (Exhibit E)
because we are satisfied with Paul Hasting's draft of this document and (2)
the LLC Promissory Note (Exhibit D) because Marguerite will circulate this
document as soon as she is done preparing it.

Don't hesitate to contact me if you have any questions.

Best regards,

Marisa Reuter
King & Spalding
1100 Louisiana, Suite 3300
713-751-3244 (tel)
713-276-7440 (fax)

 <<LetterAgreement.DOC>>  <<MarkedLetterAgreement.DOC>>  <<ENANote.DOC>>
<<MarkedENANote.DOC>>  <<LLCAgmt.DOC>>  <<MarkedLLCAgmt.DOC>>
<<EscrowAgmt.DOC>>  <<MarkedEscrowAgmt.DOC>>  <<ENAGuaranty.DOC>>
<<MarkedENAGuaranty.DOC>>  <<Assignment&AssumptionAgmt.DOC>>

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

 - LetterAgreement.DOC
 - MarkedLetterAgreement.DOC
 - ENANote.DOC
 - MarkedENANote.DOC
 - LLCAgmt.DOC
 - MarkedLLCAgmt.DOC
 - EscrowAgmt.DOC
 - MarkedEscrowAgmt.DOC
 - ENAGuaranty.DOC
 - MarkedENAGuaranty.DOC
 - Assignment&AssumptionAgmt.DOC


thanks for everything.  really 'ppreciate it, 'migo.   and please thank
karen, too.  also, would you tell her that prentice and i are willing and
able (we think) to help out in any way we can in putting the fireplace stuff
together----i.e., anything that doesn't require real skill, like sticking
tiles on the board.  just let us know.

Best,
Jeff

tah-mo


Whoops!  I goofed.  The transport deduct on gross volumes (including fuel
value) is $.2602.  The transport deduct on net volumes is $.2422.

Sorry for the confusion.

Susan

Stevens_Hollister@eott.com on 01/04/2001 11:38:51 AM
To: Susan.W.Pereira@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Re: Bazor Ridge Gas Plant

Susan,

Joe Casa is supplying the volumes to the Gas Plant, could you please give
me the price for December?

Thank you,

Stevens


I saw you didn't get these.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 12/07/2000 09:52
AM ---------------------------
From: Roseann Engeldorf on 12/07/2000 09:39 AM
To: michael.barnas@ps.ge.com
cc: Kay.Mann@enron.com, kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com, Lisa.Bills@enron.com,
paul.miller@ps.ge.com, Roseann.Engeldorf@enron.com, Sheila.Tweed@enron.com,
stephen.swift@ps.ge.com, "ROB TAYLOR" <TAYLR@andrews-kurth.com>

Subject: Assignment and Consent

See attached.

----- Forwarded by Roseann Engeldorf/Corp/Enron on 12/07/2000 09:37 AM -----

	Roseann Engeldorf
	12/06/2000 11:12 PM

		 To: michael.barnas@ps.ge.com
		 cc: Kay.Mann@enron.com, kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com, Lisa.Bills@enron.com,
paul.miller@ps.ge.com, Roseann.Engeldorf@enron.com, Sheila.Tweed@enron.com,
stephen.swift@ps.ge.com
		 Subject: Yet another version

We will agree that the attached does not apply to world hunger - only to
Turbo Park.

Rose

	michael.barnas@ps.ge.com
	12/06/2000 03:33 PM

		 To: Kay.Mann@enron.com, Sheila.Tweed@enron.com, Roseann.Engeldorf@enron.com,
Lisa.Bills@enron.com
		 cc: kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com, stephen.swift@ps.ge.com, paul.miller@ps.ge.com
		 Subject: New, Improved Consent to Assignment and Assignment Sideletter Lan
guage

Fellow Sufferers,

Below you will find:

(a)    a revised Consent to Assignment, and

(b)    assignment language waiting to be framed:

Please note that in the interest of time I am sending them to you before the
GE team has had an opportunity to review them.  Accordingly, there may be
some addition comments from our side.

Happy reading!

 Mike Barnas
g _____________
Michael C. Barnas
Counsel, Power Plants Commercial Operations
GE Power Systems
One River Road - Building 37, Room 307
Schenectady,  NY 12345  USA
Phone 8*235-7602       (518) 385 7602
Fax     8*235 5466        (518) 385 5466
Mobile 518 369 9538

This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law.  If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent
responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this
communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this message in
error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail and erase all copies of
this message.  Thank you.

 - ESAconsentMCBRev.doc
 - WorldHungerAssignmentDec6.doc


Is this a violation, or are we just shifting portfolios around.  Jeff

	From:  Christian LeBroc @ ENRON                           10/26/2000 10:58 AM

To: Hugo Moreira/LON/ECT@ECT, David J Botchlett/HOU/ECT@ECT, John L
Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Chismar/SIN/ECT@ECT, John Buckner
Thomas/SIN/ECT@ECT, Scott Earnest/HOU/ECT@ECT, Risk Controls@ECT, Mary
Thambiah/LON/ECT@ECT, Oliver Gaylard/LON/ECT@ECT, Bjorn
Hagelmann/HOU/ECT@ECT, Manfred Roenz/Corp/Enron@Enron, Lee
Jackson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Homan Amiry/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark Fondren/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Swinney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cindy Horn/LON/ECT@ECT,
Michelle Bruce/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Liquids Limits Oct.25


Rick:

The California team has been working tirelessly for months on end to protect Enron's business interests and good name under tremendously challenging circumstances.  As a shareholder, I appreciate the team's individual and collective efforts.  Your message is obviously heart-felt, and appropriately recognizes the important work that has been (and continues to be) done.  That kind of recognition is what inspires people to keep on keeping on.

Lisa


FYI

Vince
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 06/29/2000
10:41 AM ---------------------------

VKaminski@aol.com on 06/28/2000 11:11:37 PM
To: vkamins@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Control

 STO
A: Political control technologies - Summary of Interim Study


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Gay, Randall L.
Sent:	Tuesday, November 06, 2001 11:37 AM
To:	Holst, Keith
Subject:	tw shippers


Carolyn,

I prefer that closing event #4 preceed #3.

Thanks,

Kay

"Campbell, Carolyn" <CCampbell@KSLAW.com> on 04/19/2001 10:05:16 PM
To: "'kay.mann@enron.com'" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc: "Keffer, John" <JKeffer@KSLAW.com>

Subject: Salmon Closing Memorandum

 <<30C_01!.DOC>>

Kay:

Enclosed is the initial draft of a closing memorandum for the Salmon
transaction.  Please review and advise of any comments.  Thank you.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King & Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com>

Enclosure: 140424v1

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

 - 30C_01!.DOC


---------------------- Forwarded by Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT on 07/26/99 08:38 AM
---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  DJIRequests @ ENRON                           07/13/99 09:56 PM

To: Dow Jones Interactive - North America Enron
cc:
Subject: Announcing - Dow Jones Interactive

We are pleased to announce corporate-wide availability of Dow Jones
Interactive (DJI)--the world's most comprehensive business intelligence
service--directly to employees' desktops.  The top quality business
information Dow Jones provides gives Enron a competitive edge with superior
insights from top business publications such as The Wall Street Journal.  You
now have instant access to high quality, current business news and analysis
in addition to archival searching for more informed decision-making.

Scan the latest news on the energy industry, search over 6,000 publications,
set up alerts to competitor activity from around the world and analyze a
potential merger with a full review of a company's performance.  You can even
set up your own custom news folders to receive regularly updated articles on
companies, markets--whatever you select!

GETTING STARTED - REQUEST DJI FOR YOUR DESKTOP

Submit your request for DJI through the Enron Lotus Notes SRRS process and
choose the application "DJI".  Should you need assistance with your SRRS
request, please contact ECT Security/Information Risk Management at
713-853-5536.

If you do not have access to SRRS, submit your DJI request to the email
address:  djirequests@enron.com, and provide the following information:

First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Company Name
City
State
Zip Code
(Country if outside the US, Province if Canada)

OPEN HOUSE JULY 27

You're cordially invited to an open house on TUESDAY, JULY 27 to see Dow
Jones in action.  Dow Jones representatives will be on hand to demonstrate
the power of this service at EB560.  Come any time between the hours of 8:30
a.m. ) 4:30 p.m. (every half-hour on the half-hour).  There will be free
gifts from Dow Jones and refreshments will be provided.

For other valuable tips and information or a brief tour, visit the DJI
information site at: http://ask.djinteractive.com/enron/

TRAINING

We will also offer special classes beginning the week of July 12th for
hands-on training so you can learn how easy it is to access the information
you need.  Please contact LeRea Pharr in the Training Department (x3-1816) to
schedule your training.

IF YOU NEED HELP, CONTACT:

? Your Enron Help Desk
? Dow Jones Customer Service, 8:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. EST at 800-369-7466
? Lynn Yost, Account Development Executive, 713-840-1432,
lynn.yost@dowjones.com
? Idella Attuquayefio, Sales Associate, 713-626-1592,
idella.attuquayefio@dowjones.com
? Tina Byrne, Enterprise Consultant, 713-626-8833, tina.byrne@dowjones.com
? Lisa Lees, Enron Market Intelligence, 713-853-6322, mktintell@ect.enron.com


Could I get Bloomberg installed on my machine please.

Thank You


Start Date: 4/24/01; HourAhead hour: 12;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Generation schedule.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042412.txt

---- Generation Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE.
     Details: (Hour: 12 / Preferred:   0.00 / Final:   0.00)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EES
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/24/01
  UNIT_ID: BADLND_7_PL1X2

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 12 / Preferred: 133.85 / Final: 133.30)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: SDG1
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/24/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


Sorry, Richard, out system was out most of yesterday.  Attached are the Maine and Massachusetts labels you requested.  Let me know when you want to get together.

Thanks, Christy


I received this letter form Goldman Sachs this morning.  According to them
short positions are the only ones that require this letter.  Can we
use/modify this letter and submit it to Morgan Stanley and Bear stearns, or
do we need to get something from each of them?  Please let me know.

Thanks,

Terri
3-9899

---------------------- Forwarded by Terri Harlan/HOU/ECT on 09/27/2000 01:25
PM ---------------------------

"Sibeud, Eugenie B" <eugenie.sibeud@gs.com> on 09/27/2000 12:09:50 PM
To: "'Tharlan@enron.com'" <Tharlan@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:

Apologies for the delay.  My e-mail went totally dead last night, and has
just now come back.  (Apparently I have sent to many large document files).

Attached is the assignment agreement that we discussed.  Please feel free to
call me if you have any questions.  I can be reached at (212) 902-1930.

Kind regards,

Eugenie Sibeud

 <<Enron Assignment.doc>>

 - Enron Assignment.doc


I don't think that it is one of our top issues.  I'd recommend that we stay out.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Migden, Janine
Sent:	Thursday, November 08, 2001 10:36 AM
To:	Kingerski, Harry; Shapiro, Richard; Steffes, James D.; Boston, Roy
Subject:	RE: Illinois

Thanks.
I concur, but I wanted to get the issues out there for discussion.  What is your view on intervening in the City of Chicago's investigation case?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kingerski, Harry
Sent:	Thursday, November 08, 2001 10:12 AM
To:	Migden, Janine; Shapiro, Richard; Steffes, James D.
Cc:	Boston, Roy
Subject:	RE: Illinois

Janine - my thoughts -

On the rate cases, I don't think we need any change of direction.  For the IP case, our argument is just the legal one of whether they can discriminate.  And there were a lot more parties involved with ComEd than IP, even though the issues are basically the same, so I wouldn't worry there about perception.

The bigger deal may be our protest of Dynergy's protest of Com Ed's treatment of Firm LD for marketers.  The filing has already been made, so we should stay on track.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Migden, Janine
Sent:	Wednesday, November 07, 2001 5:15 PM
To:	Shapiro, Richard; Steffes, James D.; Kingerski, Harry
Cc:	Boston, Roy
Subject:	Illinois

Given the recent developments with the potential merger between Enron and Dynergy, there are a few policy questions in Illinois for which we would like guidance:

Illinois Power

We have intervened in the delivery service tariff case and are handling it primarily inhouse and solo - no other marketers.  Yesterday, we filed a Reply (greatly toned down - sticking to the facts only) to IP's memo contra our Motion to Dismiss.  URM decided not to do testimony so at this point we contemplate not showing up at the hearing and briefing only.  Recall that the issue is that to raise distribution tariffs for only unbundled customers taking service from an alternative supplier is unlawful and also anticompetitive and discriminatory, etc.  Our book impact could be around $2 million, I believe should IP get the full increase.  Moreover, it would stifle future competition.

query:  Should our course of action be altered?

ComEd

ComEd parallels IP except that it is going forward first.  We made the same arguments on the Motion to Dismiss, which was denied by the Judge.  Our plan is to seek rehearing with the full Commission and to point out that the ICC filed comments at FERC with respect to increasing only unbundled transmission rates that were fully consistent with our arguments respecting distribution!

The case is currently in hearing and we have an Enron witness testifying.

In a separate move in this case, the City of Chicago and Cook county have filed a separate action requesting an audit and investigation of ComEd's books and records alleging basically that ComEd is seeking double recovery of costs.  If we intervened it might be possible to do so without paying any of the costs, assuming Blackhawk and AES/New Energy agree (we have done this for them in the past).
Upsides are that it would be viewed positively by the City of Chicago and Cook County as supporting them.  Downsides are that this really gets into rate issues that in previous RCR discussions we were told to stay away from and secondly, do we really want to be supporting an audit and investigation of another utility's books and records right now, given Enron's position?

The last point is whether there is a perception problem in being more aggressive with Com Ed than IP on the rate discrimination issue, should we decide to take that path.

Janine


>
>
>>
>> President Clinton was being entertained by an African  leader.
>> They'd spent the day discussing what the country had received
>> from the Russians before the new government kicked them out.
>>
>> "The  Russians built us a power plant, a highway, and an airport.
>> Plus we learned to drink vodka and play Russian Roulette."
>>
>> President Clinton frowned. "Russian roulette's not a friendly, nice
>> game." The African leader smiled. "That's why we developed
>> African roulette. If you want, I will show you how.
>>
>> He pushed a buzzer, and a moment later six magnificently built,
>> nude women came into the room.
>>
>> "You can choose any one of those women to give you oral sex,"
>> he told Clinton.
>>
>> This gained Clinton's immediate attention, and he was ready to
>> make his decision.
>>
>> Clinton asked, "How on earth is this related to Russian Roulette?"
>>
>> The African  leader said, "One of them is a cannibal."
>>
>>
>

________________________________________________________________
YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET!
Juno now offers FREE Internet Access!
Try it today - there's no risk!  For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.


opps, forgot the attachements

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Geaccone, Tracy
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 1:53 PM
To:	Keiser, John; Gilbert, Steve
Subject:	template for Lay Reviews

Please change EGS to ETS.  Let me know if you have any questions.  Lets use the Arial font.

Thanks

Tracy


-----Original Message-----
From: 	"Tami, Eric and Jake Moon" <etjmoon@prodigy.net>@ENRON
Sent:	Monday, November 12, 2001 12:18 PM
To:	<Undisclosed-Recipient:@pimout3-int.prodigy.net;>
Subject:	Fw: the old man & the kid

>
> > Now this is funny!
> >
> >
> >
> > An old man was sitting on a bench at the mall.
> >
> > A young man walked up to the bench and sat down. He had spiked hair
> > in all different colors: green, red, orange, blue, and yellow.
> >
> > The old man just stared.
> >
> > Every time the young man looked, the old man was staring. The young
> > man finally said sarcastically, "What's the matter old timer,
> > never done anything wild in your life?"
> >
> > Without batting an eye, the old man replied, "Got drunk once and
> > had sex with a parrot. I was just wondering if you were my son."
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >  <<Fwd: the old man & the kid>>
>
> -----
> Message-ID: <49.137b85d6.2919e9fc@aol.com>
> From: Deltuck@aol.com
> To: JPHSHH@aol.com
> Subject: Fwd: the old man & the kid
> Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 18:35:56 -0700
> X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----
> Message-ID: <01c16721$d2f2e540$9ff6183f@cyndi>
> From: cynphil <cynphil@earthlink.net>
> To: Penny Wierzbicki <jwierz4626@aol.com>, Ann and Ralph Weedon
> <annralph@prodigy.net>, JULIE SCHNEIDER <jlschndr@msn.com>,
> Tracey & Charles Rossow <crossow@beanstalk.net>, MaryEllen Price
> <MaryEllenPrice@aol.com>, NYFLGIRL@aol.com, Dede Nelson
> <Snowbird205@msn.com>, Jim and Margarett Mendenhall <XPRTEC@aol.com>,
> Joyce Malatinsky <Joycemal1@home.com>, Pennie Kelley <bccolorado@aol.com>,
> grandmagreat <grandmagreat@mymailstation.com>, Claudine Gitchell
> <Ceegee529@Webtv.net>, Mike & Amy Gard <amg9995@sbinet.com>, Bob Gard
> <bob_gard@hotmail.com>, Dave and Neela Coe <djcoe@attcanada.ca>, buti
> <buti@mymailstation.com>, Victor Bella <deltuck@aol.com>, Sosimo Aparis
> <sandjaparis@peoplepc.com>
> Subject: the old man & the kid
> Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 17:19:11 -0700
> X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
>
> An old man was sitting on a bench at the mall.
>
> A young man walked up to the bench and sat down. He had spiked hair
> in all different colors: green, red, orange, blue, and yellow.
>
> The old man just stared.
>
> Every time the young man looked, the old man was staring. The young
> man finally said sarcastically, "What's the matter old timer,
> never done anything wild in your life?"
>
> Without batting an eye, the old man replied, "Got drunk once and
> had sex with a parrot. I was just wondering if you were my son."
>
>


>  -----Original Message-----
> From:  Bisson, Andrew
> Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2000 4:02 PM
> To: Mansfield, Jeff
> Subject:
>
> Jeff-
>
> Attached, please find the following:
>
>  ANP Marketing Company
>   FERC Order Granting Application, May 10, 2000
>
>
>  <<scan.pdf>>

 - scan.pdf


---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 03/20/2000
08:49 AM ---------------------------

"CHRIS KRECEK" <KRECC@andrews-kurth.com> on 03/19/2000 02:17:17 PM
To: "TOM POPPLEWELL" <POPPT@andrews-kurth.com>, <cclark@ect.enron.com>,
<cclark4@ect.enron.com>, <Dherric@ect.enron.com>, <Gbahlma@ect.enron.com>,
<ryan.siurek@enron.com>, <Sshackl@enron.com>, <mniebruegge@mayerbrown.com>,
<pbrito@mayerbrown.com>, <tellwood@mayerbrown.com>,
<john_roberts@paribas.com>, <Shaun_pacious@paribas.com>,
<Tamullen@prickett.com>, <Facciolo@rlf.com>, <kenton@rlf.com>,
<clint.carlin@us.arthurandersen.com>, <schottla@us.cibc.com>,
<wolfmark@us.cibc.com>, <Jlawler@wilmingtontrust.com>
cc: "DAVID BARBOUR" <BARBD@andrews-kurth.com>, "DALLAS GUEST ACCOUNT #2"
<DGUEST2@andrews-kurth.com>, "DEBORAH LOWE" <LOWED@andrews-kurth.com>
Subject: Enron/Project Specter

Attached are the following additional closing documents:

Assignment
Notice
Stock Power
LLC Agreement (S-Past)
LLC Agreement (S-Present)
LLC Agreement (S-Future)

 - 233364.wpd
 - 233248.wpd
 - 233340.doc
 - 233340.wpd
 - 233341.doc
 - 233341.wpd
 - 233346.doc
 - 233346.wpd
 - 233350.doc
 - 233350.wpd
 - 233364.doc
 - 233248.doc


I would rate her as 4 overall in each category.  I would use her again.

	Becky Spencer
	05/22/2001 08:50 AM

		 To: Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Ogden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan J
Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carlos Sole/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Vanessa Griffin/ENRON@enronXgate
		 Subject: Comments needed-Jackie Gudger 5/21

Your comments are needed for Jackie Gudger  who sat in for Vanessa Griffin.
Please return as soon as possible.  Thank you!-Becky

 Excellent = 5       Above Average = 4      Average = 3            Below
Average = 2            Poor = 1

 Initiative

 Cooperation

 Punctuality

 Attendance

 Quality of Work

 Would you request this person again Y/N?


Thanks.  I had a feeling Laura's gift was the bath bag.  As for the $20
donation, I'm glad we got it, because we ended up short on the cash collected
for the cookies.

Susan

Elise Weatherall <EWeatherall@WULFE.com> on 02/26/2001 12:14:57 PM
To: "'Susan.W.Pereira@enron.com'" <Susan.W.Pereira@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: RE: Birthday present

Laura wrote her name on the tissue paper because she forgot a card. Her gift
was the bath bag with the lip gloss.
Sorry for the confusion. That's great about the cookie sales. Did Karen
George tell you that someone gave us a $20.00 donation as well!
Great job!

Elise Weatherall

12 Greenway Plaza, Suite1500
Houston, Texas 77046
(713) 621-1700
(713) 621-3244 fax
eweatherall@wulfe.com

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Susan.W.Pereira@enron.com [mailto:Susan.W.Pereira@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 11:48 AM
To: eweatherall@wulfe.com
Subject: Birthday present

Hi, Elise.  Sorry to bother you, but when Kali was unwrapping her presents
last night, there were two without cards or tags (probably lost in
transit!!).  We narrowed it down to Laura and Sofi.  So that we can get the
thank you notes correct, did Laura give Kali  a Skipper doll or a bath set
in a blue bag?  Thanks for your help.

Susan

P.S.- We ended up selling 131 boxes at the booth on Saturday.


AAI Presentation:

(See attached file: DRT2753.jdnmu.PPT)

News weather ......

Thanks for agreeing to speak Steve.

 - DRT2753.jdnmu.PPT
 - South Texas Pres Aug 13 2000.pges.alledits.ppt


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT on 11/01/2000
11:33 AM ---------------------------

Jeff Richter
10/20/2000 02:16 PM
To: Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Generation

http://westpower.enron.com/ca/generation/default.asp


Please follow up with Lou on this.  It sounds like something the commercial
people would be in a good position to answer, so maybe start by finding out
if they are already responding, either through Lou or otherwise.  Then get
the right people to review and supplement this list.  Thanks. df
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 11/08/2000
12:29 PM ---------------------------

11/08/2000 11:06 AM
Louis Soldano
Louis Soldano
Louis Soldano
11/08/2000 11:06 AM
11/08/2000 11:06 AM
To: John Shafer/OTS/Enron, Janet Place/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Molly
Sample/Houston/Eott@Eott, David Johnson/EU/Enron@Enron, David L
Johnson/OTS/Enron@ENRON, David Bush/ECF/Enron@ENRON, Mark
Cartwright/ECF/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dorothy
McCoppin/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Don Hawkins/OTS/Enron@Enron
cc: Phil Lowry/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Shelley Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, James
Prentice/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Colleen Raker/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michael
Moran/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: ETS Products/Services

EHS Corporate has asked we verify this inventory of services/products  from
all of the various companies that fit under the very broadest form of the ETS
umbrella.  I offer the following thoughts:  I don't believe EOTT has any
relationship with the Mt. Belvieu storage operations; I don't know if we
purchase natural gas except for fuel purposes; do we currently have any gas
gathering facilities?? or just transmission??; EOTT Fleet Vehicles could be
better defined; Risk Management services??

Feedback would be extremely helpful before the 17th
---------------------- Forwarded by Louis Soldano/ET&S/Enron on 11/08/2000
10:53 AM ---------------------------
From: Susan Worthen@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 11/07/2000 10:00 AM
To: Louis Soldano/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: ETS Products/Services

Lou,

This is a follow-up to a meeting we had about 2 months ago on Life Cycle
Impact Assessments.  The 1st phase of the assessment involves completing an
inventory of Enron's products\services and volumes.  I am currently
requesting each business unit to verify the products and services we have
identified and make any modifications to the list.  I am enlisting your
assistance to do this for ETS, including EOTT.  I need to have the
verification completed by 11/17. Please advise if you have any questions.

Thanks,
Susan Worthen
Director
Environmental Compliance, Enron Corp
713/646-6579  713/345-6164 fax
3AC 1525


Hi yourself,

I swear you read my mind sometimes...I was just about to email you.  Anyway, things here are good and I am equally (if not more) excited about my visit.  I know the weather's been kind of funky the last week or so but I've been hearing the same rumours as you regarding a weekend warm-up.  Therefore, I'm still bringing my suit/beach clothes and will just make sure I've got some stuff in case it stays on the chilly side.  I'll also make sure to include some work-out clothes and Sunday attire ( I'm assuming a skirt or dress will work okay? ).

No worries about the need to study.  I've been go-go-go the last couple of weekends and would not mind at all having some down-time during the day for naps, lounging, walking, etc. while you study to your hearts content.  Honestly, we've got plenty of time to do things so it's no big deal.

My flight is supposed to arrive Thursday night at 7:00 and I leave at 3:40 Sunday afternoon ( I got direct flights this time so I won't be nearly as tired).

Hope this week isn't too crazy for you...of course, if it is you'll be more than ready for a little R&R.

Love,
Susan

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.  From:  Julie Gibson <julieg@qualcomm.com>                           04/09/2001 10:26 AM

To:	Susan M Scott <Susan.M.Scott@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:	Hello!

hi susan-

how are you??  things are super crazy here, so wanted to drop you a note
before it's suddenly thursday!  i am SO excited for your visit and a day
off- i do have to warn you that my statistics mid-term got postponed
(horrible and a relief at the same time) until the monday after easter, so
i may have to study a bit over the weekend....i'll of course try to get it
all done before you get in on thursday, though!  don't want to intrude on
our beach time!

the weather is odd right now- raining and chilly, but they're claiming it
will warm up to 68 by friday- hopefully warmer.....so still definitely
bring your suit, running shoes, and church clothes for Easter.....

what are your flight times?

can't wait to see you!
love,
julie


Start Date: 4/29/01; HourAhead hour: 3;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.
Variances detected in SC Trades schedule.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042903.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 3 / Preferred:  13.00 / Final:   9.16)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/29/01
  TIE_POINT: FCORNR_5_PSUEDO
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_SCOUT
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM

---- SC Trades Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblInt_Interchange.
     Details: (Hour: 3 / Preferred: 194.00 / Final: 190.19)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/29/01
  TRADING_SC: APX1
  PNT_OF_INTRC: NP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 2
  DEAL_NO: 1

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 3 / Preferred:   4.37 / Final:   4.34)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: SCE1
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/29/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


MWilczek@nyiso.com writes to the NYISO_TECH_EXCHANGE Discussion List:

The NYISO is reserving hours beginning 0:00, 14:00 and 17:00 in the October
20, 2001
Real-Time Market as well as the following hours per ECA 20010608B to verify
prices:

HQ:  4:00 - 6:00 and 23:00
OH:  23:00
NE:  23:00
PJM: 15:00, 17:00, 21:00 and 23:00

In addition, the NYISO is reserving all ancillary service prices for hour
beginning 18:00 in the October 20, 2001 Hour-Ahead Market.

Prices in the October 21, 2001 Day-Ahead Market are correct.

This e-mail information is a copy of the official posting which can be
found at the following address of our website:
http://mis.nyiso.com/public/htm/OperMessages/CurrentOperMessages.htm#mm


vacation all week.

-----Original Message-----
From: Alamo, Joseph
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 5:09 PM
To: Kaufman, Paul; Comnes, Alan; Dasovich, Jeff; Petrochko, Mona L.
Cc: Tracy, Lysa
Subject: Schedules request for week of September 4th

Please forward you schedules for the week of September 4 - 7 to me as soon as possible.

Thanks,

Joseph Alamo
Sr. Administrative Assistant
Global Government Affairs
ph. (415) 782-7841
fax (415) 782-7854
e-mail: joseph.alamo@enron.com


ENJOY
----- Forwarded by Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT on 05/21/2001 04:46 PM -----

	Continental Airlines Inc
<Continental_Airlines_Inc_051501@airmail.continental.com>
	05/15/2001 07:10 PM

		 To: Elizabeth.Sager@Enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: ONEPASS MEMBER CO.O.L. TRAVEL SPECIALS FOR Elizabeth Sager

ONEPASS MEMBER CO.O.L. TRAVEL SPECIALS
DOMESTIC U.S.
Wednesday, May 16, 2001
****************************************

Summer Forecast: Unseasonably Low Fares.

Save up to 10% on continental.com off already
low sale fares for travel from the U.S. to select
destinations around the world at continental.com.

For details and to purchase your ticket now visit:
http://airmail.continental.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eD2o03p650a0jWA0Af

****************************************
TABLE OF CONTENTS FOR CO.O.L. TRAVEL SPECIALS
1. OnePass Miles CO.O.L. Travel Specials Offers
2. CO.O.L. Travel Specials Offers
3. Featured Fares Sample Destinations
4. Alamo Rent A Car Offers
5. National Car Rental Offers
6. Westin Hotels & Resorts, Sheraton Hotels & Resorts,
   Four Points by Sheraton, St. Regis, The Luxury Collection and W Hotels
7. Hilton Hotel Offers

****************************************
This week's specials are good for the following markets departing Saturday,
May 19 and returning on either Monday, May 21 or Tuesday, May
22, 2001. Please see the Terms and Conditions listed at the end of
this e-mail.
****************************************
1. OnePass Miles CO.O.L. Travel Specials Offers

For OnePass members, here are special opportunities to redeem miles for
travel to the following destinations. As an additional benefit, OnePass
Elite members can travel using the miles below as the only payment
necessary. The following are this week's OnePass CO.O.L. Travel Specials.

To use your OnePass miles (as listed below) to purchase CO.O.L. Travel
Specials, you must call 1-800-642-1617.

THERE WILL NOT BE AN ADDITIONAL $20 CHARGE WHEN
REDEEMING ONEPASS MILES FOR CO.O.L. TRAVEL SPECIALS THROUGH
THE TOLL FREE RESERVATIONS NUMBER.

****************************************
TRAVEL MAY ORIGINATE IN EITHER CITY
****************************************
****Roundtrip BETWEEN CLEVELAND, OH and:

$29 + 12,500 Miles - Louisville, KY
$29 + 12,500 Miles - New York  (LaGuardia only)

****Roundtrip BETWEEN HOUSTON, TX and:

$29 + 12,500 Miles - Amarillo, TX
$29 +  7,500 Miles - Austin, TX
$29 +  7,500 Miles - Brownsville/South Padre Island, TX
$29 + 10,000 Miles - Dallas/Ft. Worth, TX (Love Field only)
$29 + 12,500 Miles - Lubbock, TX
$29 + 12,500 Miles - Midland/Odessa, TX
$29 +  7,500 Miles - San Antonio, TX
$29 + 12,500 Miles - Tulsa, OK
$29 + 12,500 Miles - Washington, DC (Dulles Airport only)

****Roundtrip BETWEEN NEW YORK/NEWARK and:

$29 + 12,500 Miles - Indianapolis, IN
$29 + 12,500 Miles - Louisville, KY

****************************************
2. CO.O.L. Travel Specials Offers

Purchase CO.O.L. Travel Specials online until 11:59pm (CST) Friday at
http://airmail.continental.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eD2o03p650a0jWB0Ag
You can also purchase CO.O.L. Travel Specials for an additional cost of $20
per ticket through our telephone service at 1-800-642-1617.

********************************
TRAVEL MAY ORIGINATE IN EITHER CITY
********************************
****Roundtrip BETWEEN CLEVELAND, OH and:

$119 - Louisville, KY
$139 - New York  (LaGuardia only)

****Roundtrip BETWEEN HOUSTON, TX and:

$139 - Amarillo, TX
$79  - Austin, TX
$79  - Brownsville/South Padre Island, TX
$99  - Dallas/Ft. Worth, TX (Love Field only)
$119 - Lubbock, TX
$129 - Midland/Odessa, TX
$79  - San Antonio, TX
$129 - Tulsa, OK
$139 - Washington, DC (Dulles Airport only)

****Roundtrip BETWEEN NEW YORK/NEWARK and:

$129 - Indianapolis, IN
$139 - Louisville, KY

********************************
3. FEATURED FARES SAMPLE DESTINATION

Choose your fare, find your flight. Or, quickly sift through all our great
featured fares by choosing a destination or origin. Be spontaneous. Get out
of town. Current Featured Fares destinations include:

New York, Baltimore, Buffalo, Houston,
Cleveland, Phoenix, and many more.

Note: Featured Fares change often. To see a regularly-updated online list
and purchase our Featured Fares, visit the website at:
http://airmail.continental.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eD2o03p650a0jWC0Ah

(Capacity controls and other restrictions apply)

********************************
4. CO.O.L. TRAVEL SPECIALS FROM ALAMO RENT A CAR

Rates listed below are valid on compact class vehicles at airport locations
only. Other car types may be available.  Rates are valid for rentals on
Saturday, May 19, 2001 with returns Monday, May 21, 2001 or Tuesday, May 22,
2001.
-------------------------------
$20 a day in:  Austin, TX (AUS)
$20 a day in:  Cleveland, OH (CLE)
$18 a day in:  Dallas, TX (DAL)
$26 a day in:  Newark, NJ (EWR)
$18 a day in:  Washington, D.C. (IAD)
$18 a day in:  Houston, TX (IAH)
$20 a day in:  Indianapolis, IN (IND)
$18 a day in:  San Antonio, TX (SAT)
$18 a day in:  Tulsa, OK (TUL)

To receive special Continental CO.O.L. discounted rates, simply make advance
reservations and be sure to request ID # 596871 and Rate Code 33. Book your
reservation online at:

http://airmail.continental.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eD2o03p650a0bf10AW
or contact Alamo at 1-800 GO ALAMO.

*If you are traveling to a city or a different date that is not listed,
Alamo offers great rates when you book online at:
http://airmail.continental.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eD2o03p650a0bf20AX

For complete details on these offers, please refer to Alamo's terms and
conditions below.

****************************************
5. CO.O.L. TRAVEL SPECIALS FROM NATIONAL CAR RENTAL

Rates listed below are valid on intermediate class vehicles at airport
locations
only. Other car types may be available.  Rates are valid for rentals on
Saturday, May 19, 2001 with returns Monday, May 21, 2001 or Tuesday, May 22,
2001.
------------------------------------------
$21 a day in:  Amarillo, TX (AMA)
$23 a day in:  Austin, TX (AUS)
$23 a day in:  Cleveland, OH (CLE)
$21 a day in:  Dallas, TX (DAL)
$39 a day in:  Newark, NJ (EWR)
$21 a day in:  Washington, D.C. (IAD)
$21 a day in:  Houston, TX (IAH)
$26 a day in:  Indianapolis, IN (IND)
$21 a day in:  Lubbock, TX (LBB)
$47 a day in:  New York, NY (LGA)
$23 a day in:  Midland/Odessa, TX (MAF)
$24 a day in:  San Antonio, TX (SAT)
$23 a day in:  Louisville, KY (SDF)
$21 a day in:  Tulsa, OK (TUL)

To receive your special Continental Airlines CO.O.L. Travel Specials
discounted rates, simply make your reservations in advance and be sure to
request Product Code COOLUS.  To make your reservation, contact National at
1-800-CAR-RENT (1-800-227-7368), or book your reservation online at
http://airmail.continental.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eD2o03p650a0hO30AH
Please enter COOLUS in the Product Rate Code field, and 5037126 in the
Contract
ID field to ensure you get these rates on these dates.

* If you are traveling to a city or a different date that is not listed,
National offers great rates when you book online at:
http://airmail.continental.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eD2o03p650a0DwD0Ac

For complete details on these offers, please refer to National's terms and
conditions below.

****************************************
6. CO.O.L. TRAVEL SPECIALS LAST-MINUTE WEEKEND
RATES FROM WESTIN HOTELS & RESORTS, SHERATON HOTELS
& RESORTS, FOUR POINTS BY SHERATON, ST. REGIS,
THE LUXURY COLLECTION, AND W HOTELS

Visit our site for booking these and other Last-Minute Weekend Rates for
this weekend May 18- May 22, 2001.
http://airmail.continental.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eD2o03p650a0D7n0AG

--------------------------------------
Indiana - Indianapolis - The Westin Indianapolis - $87.00

New Jersey - Elizabeth - Four Points by Sheraton Newark - $71.00
New Jersey - Parsippany - Sheraton Parsippany - $70.00
New Jersey - Piscataway - Four Points by Sheraton Piscataway - $65.00

New York - New York City - Sheraton Russell - $179.00

Texas - Dallas - Sheraton Suites Market Center - $64.00
Texas - Frisco - Sheraton Stonebrier - $102.00
Texas - Houston - Westin Galleria Houston - $64.00
Texas - Houston - Westin Oaks - $70.00
Texas - Houston - Sheraton Houston Brookhollow - $65.00
Texas - Houston - Sheraton North Houston - $64.00

Washington D.C. - District of Columbia - Sheraton Premiere at Tysons Corner -
$69.00

For complete details on these offers, please refer to the terms and conditions
below.

****************************************
7. CO.O.L. TRAVEL SPECIALS ON HILTON HOTELS AND RESORTS

The following rates are available May 19-21, 2001 and are priced per night.
--------------------------------------
Austin, TX - Hilton Austin North and Towers - $129
Austin, TX - Doubletree Hotel Austin - $129
Austin, TX - Doubletree Guest Suites - $159

Cleveland, OH - Hilton Garden Inn Cleveland Airport - $89

Dallas, TX - Hilton Arlington, Arlington, TX. - $129
Dallas, TX - Hilton Dallas Parkway - $110
Dallas, TX - Hilton DFW Lakes Executive Conference Center, Grapevine, TX. -
$149
Dallas, TX - Hilton Dallas Park Cities - $129/Night, 5/19-20

Houston, TX - Hilton Houston Hobby Airport - $88
Houston, TX - Hilton Houston Southwest - $109

Indianapolis, IN - Doubletree Guest Suites Indianapolis/Carmel,
Carmel, IN. - $129

Louisville, KY - Doubletree Club Louisville, - $99
Louisville, KY - The Seelbach Hilton Louisville - $179/Night,5/19-20

New York, NY - Hilton Huntington, Melville, NY. - $219
New York, NY & Newark, NJ - Hilton Hasbrouck Heights, Hasbrouck Heights,
NJ.  $149/Night, 5/19-20
New York, NY & Newark, NJ - Hilton Newark Gateway, Newark, NJ. - $229
New York, NY & Newark, NJ - Hilton New York, New York, NY. - $179
New York, NY & Newark, NJ - Millennium Hilton Next to the World Trade
Center, New York, NY. - $145
New York, NY & Newark, NJ - Hilton Pearl River, Pearl River, NY.
$129/Night, 5/19-20

San Antonio, TX - Doubletree Club San Antonio Airport - $69

Washington, DC - Hilton Washington Embassy Row - $189
Washington, DC - Hilton Washington Dulles Airport, Herndon, VA. - $165
Washington, DC - Hilton Gaithersburg, Gaithersburg, MD. - $129

To book this week's special rates for Hilton Family Hotels, visit and book at
http://airmail.continental.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eD2o03p650a0jWG0Al

Special rates apply only for the dates listed at each hotel and are subject to
availability. Check hilton.com for specific dates at each Hilton Family Hotel.
Or call at 1-800-774-1500 and ask for Value Rates. Restrictions apply to these
rates.

****************************************
CO.O.L. TRAVEL SPECIALS RULES:
Fares include a $37.20 fuel surcharge.  Passenger Facility Charges, up
to $12 depending on routing, are not included. Up to $2.75 per
segment federal excise tax, as applicable, is not included.  Applicable
International and or Canadian taxes and fees up to $88, varying by
destination, are not included and may vary slightly depending on currency
exchange rate at the time of purchase.
For a complete listing of rules please visit:
http://airmail.continental.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eD2o03p650a0jWD0Ai

ALAMO RENT A CAR'S TERMS AND CONDITIONS:
Taxes (including VLF taxes up to US$1.89 per day in California and GST),
other governmentally-authorized or imposed surcharges, license recoupment
fees, fuel, additional driver fee, drop charges and optional items (such as
CDW Waiver Savers(R) up to US$18.99 a day,) are extra. Renter must meet
standard age, driver and credit requirements. Rates higher for drivers under
age 25. Concession recoupment fees may add up to 14% to the rental rate at
some on-airport locations. Up to 10.75% may be added to the rental rate if
you rent at an off-airport location and exit on our shuttle bus. Weekly
rates require a 5-day minimum rental or daily rates apply. For weekend
rates, the vehicle must be picked up after 9 a.m. on Thursday and returned
before midnight on Monday or higher daily rates apply. 24-hour advance
reservation required. May not be combined with other discounts. Availability
is limited. All vehicles must be returned to the country of origin. Offer
not valid in San Jose, CA.

NATIONAL CAR RENTAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS:
Customer must provide Contract ID# at the time of reservation to be eligible
for discounts. Offer valid at participating National locations in the US and
Canada. Minimum rental age is 25. This offer is not valid with any other
special discount or promotion. Standard rental qualifications apply. Subject
to availability and blackout dates. Advance reservations required.
Geographic driving restrictions may apply.

TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR WESTIN, SHERATON, FOUR POINTS,
ST. REGIS, THE LUXURY COLLECTION, AND W HOTELS:
Offer is subject to availability. Advance Reservations required and is based
on
single/double occupancy. Offer not applicable to group travel. Additional
Service charge and tax may apply. The discount is reflected in the rate
quoted.
Offer valid at participating hotel only. Offer valid for stays on Fri - Mon
with
a Friday or Saturday night arrival required. Rate available for this coming
weekend only. Offer available only by making reservations via the internet. A
limited number of rooms may be available at these rates.

http://airmail.continental.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eD2o03p650a0FG20AY

---------------------------------------
This E-mail message and its contents are copyrighted and are proprietary
products of Continental Airlines, Inc.  Any unauthorized use, reproduction,
or transfer of the message or its content, in any medium, is strictly
prohibited.

****************************************
UNFORTUNATELY MAIL SENT TO THIS ADDRESS CANNOT BE ANSWERED.
PLEASE SEND ALL INQUIRIES TO: mailto:eservice@coair.com

TO UNSUBSCRIBE:
We hope you will find CO.O.L. Travel Specials a valuable source of
information. However, if you prefer not to take advantage of this
opportunity, please let us know by visiting the CO.O.L. Travel Specials page
on our web site at:
http://airmail.continental.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eD2o03p650a0jWE0Aj

TO SUBSCRIBE:
Please visit the CO.O.L. Travel Specials page on our web site at:
http://airmail.continental.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eD2o03p650a0jWF0Ak


Good Morning Dana,

Needless to say, I wasn't here on that Thursday when you were trying to
contact me. I do hope that things worked out with them getting in touch
with each other. That day was a very busy day to say the least, but now
it's back to reality.

But for future references, if I can not be reached here at work or home and
there's a need to contact the Pastor, I can be paged 2 ways. A text message
can be sent by email stating your case with a very brief message and the
address you would need to use would be 7136066605@MOBCOMINET.

If you need to page me with just a phone number, I can be reached at
713-606-6605. So next time, please feel free to use the information listed
above. Be blessed on today and Happy Holiday's to you and yours.

Edith:-)
---------------------- Forwarded by Edith L. Kelly/SS/HouInd on 12/26/2000
11:05 AM ---------------------------

Dana.Davis@enron.com on 12/14/2000 11:14:22 AM

To:   edith-kelly@reliantenergy.com
cc:

Subject:

Edith- can you help Kevin get in touch with Pastor; he really needs to
speak with him.  Kevin's cell phone # is 713 320-6483.

Thanks for your help.  I'll email you when I get back from lunch.  My # is
713 853-7520.


I believe this message was intended for Susan M Scott of ENA.  I'm with ETS
Legal.

	From:  Hector McLoughlin                           12/07/2000 10:47 AM

To: Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Victor
Guggenheim/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Errol
McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Francisco deJesus/NA/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Behavioral Profile of Risk Management Personnel

I want to recap our understanding of the key cultural/behavioral attributes
that you said were important to interview for.      If you want to add to
this please don't hesitate to do so.   We will form a questionnaire tailored
to your group's needs.

The right candidate will desire an environment that will challenge them with
new situations on a constant day to day basis.   This person would become
bored and restless with routine.   This person would also enjoy learning at a
relatively fast and voluminous rate.
The candidate will rarely lose a train of thought despite interruptions and
can return to the point at which a discussion or idea was disrupted.   There
are techniques as well as questions that can address this.
The person must indicate a high degree of dependability, endurance,
follow-through, and persistence.   They must be equipped with an ability to
cope with adversity and be willing to do what it takes to get it done.
They must not be adverse to working beyond the 45hr week.    It is difficult
for the candidate to create a story that combines examples of all of these
traits unless it truly happened.   If they have these traits, they have used
them in the past.
Relatively thick skinned.   How do they accept criticism and/or reprimands?
A desire to be in control of situations is also a desirable trait.  These
applicants must want to make decisions and control outcomes almost all of the
time.   Not to be confused with micro-managers or control freaks
(yeah-buts).
Lastly, they must have an entrepreneurial focus.    They need to be the
people that make it happen, with possibilities but without guarantees  of
personal gain, a desire to take ultimate responsibility, and influence others
to get it done and make them feel good about it.   The how, what, when,
where, and why of being in a leadership role.

We will start formulating the questions and the order in which they should be
asked today.   Do you have any candidates in the near future?   We would be
glad to help you with interviewing tips.
hgm


How about a ca with PB Power (or Parsons Brinckerhoff Power)?

Thanks,

Kay


where are you at???


Attached is the final version of the filing which WPTF is?making at  FERC
this afternoon in its Califormia market investigation proceeding.? My  thanks
to all who provided comments, and special thanks to Phil Muller and Bob
Anderson for their strong support up to the very last minute!
?
Happy Thanksgiving to all of you and your families.
?
Dan
 - 11-22-00 Comments - Final.doc


Can either of the two distinguished Jim's from accounting help me with a
financial liquidation problem from 0007.  I have a deal NR2989.1 that is
showing up in my actuals for the beloved FRED file for this production
month.  When I look at the deal in TAGG, the deal is an annuity booked to
NG-Price.  I do not believe this should be in the central region.  Any
assistance in clearing this is much appreciated due to the fun meeting we had
yesterday regarding financial liquidations.  Thanks for your help guys.
Cathy this should clear/address all of our issues in 0007 for fin. liq.
PL


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
W E E K E N D   S Y S T E M S   A V A I L A B I L I T Y

F O R

April 13, 2001 5:00pm through April 16, 2001 12:00am
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SCHEDULED SYSTEM OUTAGES:

ARDMORE DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

AZURIX: No Scheduled Outages.

EB34 DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

EDI SERVER:        SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

ENRON NORTH AMERICAN LANS:  SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

FIELD SERVICES:  No Scheduled Outages.

INTERNET: No Scheduled Outages.

MESSAGING: No Scheduled Outages.

MARKET DATA: No Scheduled Outages.

NT: No Scheduled Outages.

OS/2:  No Scheduled Outages.

OTHER SYSTEMS:
Impact:  CORP
Time:  Sun 4/15/2001 at  4:45:00 AM thru Sun 4/15/2001 at  7:00:00 AM
Outage:  General maintenance for server dserv2
Disruption:  Total Disruption of Service
Environments Impacted:  Backup DNS Server
Purpose: General maintenance
Backout: BAck out the patches
restart server
Contact(s): 	Malcolm Wells

Impact:  CORP
Time:  Sun 4/15/2001 at  5:00:00 AM thru Sun 4/15/2001 at  7:00:00 AM
Outage:  Migration off fddi and general maintenance for server reporter.  The new IP address will be 172.16.2.166.
Disruption:  Total Disruption of Service
Environments Impacted:  UNIFY
Purpose: Corporate direction to move off fddi and general maintenance.
Backout: remove the patches and NIC entry
shutdown the server
change the DNS back to the original entry
restart the server
Contact(s): 	Malcolm Wells

SITARA:    SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

SUN/OSS SYSTEM: No Scheduled Outages.

TELEPHONY:    SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

TERMINAL SERVER:  No Scheduled Outages.

UNIFY:
Impact:  Unify Power
Time: Fri 4/13 at 5:00pm CST until Sat. 4/14 9:00am CST

Description: Unify Power database migration cut-over preparation activities.
Purpose: To prepare for next weekend's (4/20- 4/22) production migration of Unify Power to MS SQL Server.
Technical Desc: Unify is undergoing a database migration for Power database to provide a more stable environment.

Total Disruption of Service

Contact(s):
Regan Smith	713-853-9291
Brian Ripley	713-345-4709
Ramesh Rao	713-345-4207

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
								FOR ASSISTANCE

(713) 853-1411   Enron Resolution Center

Specific Help:
Information Risk Management			(713) 853-5536
SAP/ISC                                                                               (713) 345-4727
Unify On-Call 					(713) 284-3757  [Pager]
Sitara On-Call					(713) 288-0101  [Pager]
RUS/GOPS/GeoTools/APRS			(713) 639-9726  [Pager]
OSS/UA4/TARP				(713) 285-3165  [Pager]
CPR						(713) 284-4175  [Pager]
EDI Support 					(713) 327-3893  [Pager]
EES Help Desk					(713)853-9797 OR (888)853-9797


Jim,

I am not too familiar with the ISO program.  I think they treat load
curtailments as the equivalent of spinning reserve and pay as if it were
spinning reserve?  I don't know how participation-friendly the program is for
SCs.  I know that based on energy price signals we may at times try to agree
with the customer to reduce the customers load so that we can resell the
energy purchased for that customer.  However, I am not too sure whether we go
through the hoops to bid and prove we deserve an ancillary reserve payment.
You may want to check with Jubran and Neil on the commodity desk.

Roger

From: James D Steffes@ENRON on 10/12/2000 09:09 AM
To: Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Re: Update on CA PUC Action on Interruptible Contracts

Is there anything that Enron would like to see changed on the Cal ISO demand
program for the Summer?  I know that we are not really worried about UDC
Interruptible contracts, but maybe we can use this forum to change the way
customers who volunteer get some benefits.

Jim

	Susan J Mara@EES
	10/11/2000 11:22 AM

		 To: Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES, Douglas Condon/SFO/EES@EES, Martin
Wenzel/SFO/HOU/EES@EES, Edward Hamb/HOU/EES@EES, James M Wood/HOU/EES@EES,
Greg Nikkel/HOU/EES@EES, Chris Hendrix/HOU/EES@EES, Malcolm
Adkins/HOU/EES@EES, Mojgan Ahad/Western Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange,
Dan Bergmann/SFO/EES@EES, Chauntel Cannon/Western Region/The Bentley
Company@Exchange, Shawn Grant/Western Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange,
Deborah O'Jones/Western Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange, Geoff
Pollard/Western Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange, Stephan Rank/Western
Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange, Scott Sullivan/Western Region/The
Bentley Company@Exchange, Pat van Otterdyk/SFO/EES@EES, Steve
Walker/SFO/EES@EES, Paul Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES,
Dirk vanUlden/Western Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange, Chris H
Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Malowney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrew Wu/HOU/EES@EES
		 cc: Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES, Sandra McCubbin/SFO/EES@EES, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Update on CA PUC Action on Interruptible Contracts

SUMMARY OF CPUC ACTION:  The CPUC has instituted an investigation of current
interruptible and demand side programs.  Our CA attorneys prepared a summary
of the CPUC action, which is provided below.

ENRON ACTIONS:  Most of the calls we've received from EES have concerned the
CPUC's proposed requirement that retail customers be forced to retain their
interruptible contracts for their full five-year terms.  We have learned that
Enron has customers or potential customers on both sides of this issue -- we
have customers who want to get out of the contracts and customers who want to
stay on the programs.  After discussion with Doug Condon and others, we have
decided to stand on the sidelines and not take a position on that issue.
Please feel free to call one of us with comments or questions. Sue Mara (415)
782-7802, Jeff Dasovich -7822, Mona Petrochko -7821.

PREPARED SUMMARY:  Here is a preview of the Commission's latest actions
in response to the "crisis" in the California electric market.

In short, the Commission has instituted an Investigation into operation of
the interruptible load programs of the three UDCs, and the effect of these
programs on energy prices, other demand responsiveness programs, and the
reliability of the electric system.

The item which has gotten the most "press" from the OII so far is the
proposed temporary suspension of the tariff provisions of the three UDCs
that allow customers to opt out of their interruptible program contracts
during the 30 day window commencing November 1st.  The Commission is using
its authority under PUC Section 743 ( which gives the Commission specific
authority to amend interruptible contracts between the UDCs and qualified
heavy industrials) to propose such suspension.  Although parties are allowed
to comment on the suspension by this Thursday (the 12th), the Commission
does have the apparent authority to effect the change and it will most
likely  proceed with the suspension.

Apart from the enforced extension of the interruptible contracts, however,
the OII potentially could have broader ramifications.  The intent of the OII
is to examine all interruptible, curtailable, and demand responsiveness
programs being currently offered and/or  proposed in California, and to
determine how these programs can best be structured and/or reformulated to
serve the Commission's goal of ensuring reliable and reasonably priced
electric service within California (especially for the summer of 2001).  It
is hard to tell exactly what the Commission has in mind.  However, it is
possible that such reformulation of curtailable/demand responsiveness
programs could interfere with Enron's ability to make interruptible/ demand
responsive deals with customers.

Moreover, the OII is not merely looking at larger customers. It states as
one of the purposes of the rulemaking the identification of if and how
smaller customers can participate in curtailable programs.  Specifically,
the OII states that "we need to examine the ability of smaller customers to
participate; the development of rate design and incentive polices of such
participation; a cost/benefit analysis of such programs; and the marketing
of any such programs."


She doesn't have the signed confirm back yet. Sharen asked me about it a few
weeks ago, and Holli told me she'd send it to the confirms group as soon as
she got it. She's talking to her contact there right now to find out what's
going on. I guess she's getting a little fed up of beating around the bush
with these guys - so hopefully she'll get some concrete answers from them
today. I'll let you know whatever we find out this afternoon.

Thanks,
Kate

Stephanie Piwetz   02/26/2001 01:32 PM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: PUD Grant County Confirms

Kate, can you please ask Holli if she has a copy of the following
confirmation(s) Deal 420554.01, 420563.01 (probably confirmed together).
Sharen Cason worked on the confirmation letter, but we never received a copy
for our records.  Can you please send us a copy of the Confirmation Letter so
we can properly scan the document in our system.  Thank you for your help.
Stephanie
713-646-2443 fax


Executive Summary
-CPUC rules that SoCal must pay 15% of debt to QFs (approximately $50 million)
-Ruling heightens likelihood of voluntary bankruptcy filing by SoCal
-Voluntary filing further heightened by successful ring-fencing by EIX parent
-Bankruptcy judge firm in support for QFs

Report

1.	SoCal Loses CPUC Ruling, But Retains Appeal Option

As you may have seen, Bloomberg reported that the CPUC voted 5-0 to force SoCal to make 15% of its payments owed to alternative energy producers in California.  CPUC rules allow 30 days to appeal its rulings, leaving a window open for SoCal to buy more time.

2.	Voluntary Filing In?

With regard to a SoCal bankruptcy filing, the key now is how SoCal's board
feels about progress rather than deadlines with creditors.  In other words,
sources believe that a voluntary filing is more likely than an involuntary
filing.  A continuing lack of progress on a bailout and an increase in the
number of liens filed against SoCal is more likely to make the SoCal board
want to file for bankrutpcy voluntarily.  The recent ring-fencing by Edison
International reflects their need to pay off cross-default risk and to cut ties
in their bank facility between the parent company and lines of credit helds by SoCal.
 In and of outself, it does not necessarily signal an imminent filing.

3.	Involuntary Out?

Sources indicate that the unsecured financial creditors are not
considering a filing against SoCal.  This is because the financial creditors
believe that they would still be worse off in bankruptcy.  Sources report
that in creditor discussions, there has not been talk of the debt holders
not being paid.  "People have talked about screwing the generators and
everyone else, but not the debt holders," a source commented.

The QFs are unlikely to file against SoCal because they have fairly good
contracts in place.  Also, they receive high capacity fees in the summer
(these fees vary seasonally and are distinct from generating fees).  These
capacity fees are calculated on a rolling, 4-year basis and will be
re-calculated next year.  The QFs want this summer included in the
recalculation, incentivizing them to keep their contracts in place.

4.	Montali Supporting QFs

Judge Montali, by his recent rulings, is sending a signal that he is
concerned for the QFs and is sensitive to their hardships.  He is trying to
help them through his rulings.  For example, as long as QFs remain on line,
those who petition can receive additional payments from PG&E.  Over a
4-month period, these payments equal 20% of the QFs' pre-petition claims.
This provides the QFs incentive to remain connected to PG&E.

5.	GE Looking to Restructure Generating Capacity Financing

General Electric is reportedly "deeply concerned" about the stability of
financing generating capacity in the US.  (GE has over 70% of the gas
turbine market.)  GE is reportedly trying to keep its margins down and is
not raising its prices due to concerns about instability.  Sources believe
that a very significant percentage of generating capacity financing will
have to be restrucured in five years.


Jason said you guys might show for the Sun ride - I'm doing the 50 miles -
but you could do 40 or 62.  Maybe I'll see you there??

Claire
X 3 0390
---------------------- Forwarded by Claire Broido/HOU/ECT on 03/17/2000 03:43
PM ---------------------------

Amelia Alder@ENRON
03/14/2000 06:50 PM
To: Amelia Alder/OTS/Enron@ENRON
cc:  (bcc: Claire Broido/HOU/ECT)
Subject: Enron Training Ride & Bluebonnet Express

Enron Training Ride - March 18
Bluebonnet Express - March 19

The 3rd ride of Dan Lyons' four-ride training series leading up to the MS150
will be Saturday, March 18, as described below, along with subsequent rides
in the series.   The terrain will range from what Dan considers to be light
hills, through moderately hilly to hilly, and the traffic on each ride will
be light to moderate.  The rides will not be sagged (although each of the
rides will have stores at various distances) and riders should come prepared
with water, food and the equipment necessary to repair flat tires.  The goal
will be to ride these rides at a pace between 14-16MPH and to get in a little
hill work before the MS150.  Although prior commitment is not a requirement,
Dan would appreciate some kind of a head count, so if you plan on doing one
or more of these rides, please email him at dan.lyons@enron.com or leave him
a voice mail at (713) 853-1648.  All rides will leave promptly at 8:00 a.m.
so be sure to arrive in time to be ready for a wheels up departure at 8:00
a.m..  Look for Dan in his electric blue Explorer of ancient vintage.

Saturday - March 18.  This ride will start from Magnolia Jr. High School in
Magnolia on FM 1774 just south of FM 1488.  This ride will go north to
Plantersville, do a loop to the west and then come back via Dobbin.  This is
a moderately hilly ride.  Mileage; low 50,s.

March 25.  This ride will start from Royal Jr. High School in Pattison about
three miles north of Brookshire off of either FM 359 or FM 362.  This is a
moderately hilly ride that goes up through Burleigh and Racoon Bend to
Belville and back by way of FM 529 and FM 359.  Mileage; low 60's.

April 8.  This ride will leave from the Tomball middle school on FM 2920 in
downtown Tomball about a mile east of the intersection of FM 249 and FM
2920.  This is a hilly ride.  It will go north through Egypt and Honea up to
Montgomery and then north and west to Richards in Grimes County via the Sam
Houston National Forest.  It will then loop west and south coming back via
Dacus and Dobbin.  This century will get you ready for the big ride.

          "Hope to see you," says Dan.

Sunday - March 19 - the Bluebonnet Express - please see attached for more
details, and if you're not registered, it's too late to register online, but
you can do so by fax or you can sign up the day of the ride.  Please join us
for this fantastic ride - We usually have lots of Enron riders, and it's a
very important training ride for the MS150 conditioning.


----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 10/24/2000 05:24 PM -----

	"Fergus, Gary S." <GFergus@brobeck.com>
	10/24/2000 04:45 PM

		 To: "Richard B. Sanders Esq. (E-mail)" <richard.b.sanders@enron.com>
		 cc: "Meringolo, Peter" <PMeringolo@brobeck.com>
		 Subject: Some thoughts on options

PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL
ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGE

Richard,

 After today's discussion here are our brainstorming ideas on
options:

1.   WAIT FOR A BETTER PROTECTIVE ORDER
 Ask Harvey Morris where they are on fixing the protective order that
is being litigated by others.  If the protective order has not  changed,
then unilaterally postpone production until it is.  Pro: Better protection
and more time; Con: Even with a more stringent
 protective order Enron still questions whether the PUC is entitled
to financial performance data.  Thus, this option does not fully
disclose all of Enron's positions and the company may be accused later of
simply engaging in delaying tactics.  Under this option  we file our
formal objections as well.

2. TURN OVER THE TRANSACTION DATA AS IS
 Continue on our present course of turning over transaction data for
electricity that was delivered.  Pro: PUC will get the data  anyway
either through FERC, unfair competition, antitrust or price gouging
litigation.  By turning over the data that will show  profits, PUC might
slow down investigation there as opposed to interrupting the business by
seeking to depose witnesses etc.  Con:  This would be waiving the
legitimate question that Enron has as to the PUC's ability to discovery this
information through a  subpoena.  There is also a question of how
confidential this data would be given the current political agenda.  It
might also serve  to whet the appetite of the PUC for more Enron
information and discovery.   This option would also provide confidential
proprietary information to the PUC about how Enron gets its competitive
advantage.

3. TURN OVER DATA FOR OUTSIDE OF CALIFORNIA AND LET PUC GET REST OF
DATA FROM ISO AND PX.
 We have told the PUC we do not want to duplicate the efforts of ISO
and PX so the way to relieve the burden on us is to give  only missing
data. PRO:  It would be easier and quicker to just give the outside of
California data and would sidestep for the
 moment the ongoing jurisdictional question.  Con:  Without Enron
cost data for the California ISO and PX transactions, the PUC
 would not be able to arrive at what they want -- a profit and loss
picture.  We would have a hard time representing to the PUC that  the
combination of the PUC data and the Enron data would be all that they need
to calculate the answers to Request Nos. 7-10.

4. TURN OVER EVERYTHING BUT PRICE
 This option would simple omit the price data.  Pro:  It would not
reveal the profit and loss information.  Con:  It would not reveal the
profit and loss information.  In other words, the PUC is clear that this is
what they are after.  By giving them everything else, we
 would in effect be telling them we will not turn over profit and
loss.  Moreover, by piecing some of it together with the ISO and PX
data, the PUC might be able to put together a revenue picture which will be
quite large, but just not the cost or expense side.

5. DECLINE TO PRODUCE THE DATA
 We would tell Harvey Morris that Enron has reconsidered its position
for the following reasons:  (1) Our firm belief that the PUC is  not
entitled to the profit and loss data they are seeking; (2) in his latest
email, Harvey has made it clear that the PUC wants more  data (1999)
than we discussed earlier; (3) continued threat that if they do not like the
transaction data they will come back and  ask for profit and loss
information that we do not believe they are entitled to; (4) Commissioner
Wood's statement that the purpose  of this investigation is to get
money from market participants in the hands of consumers; (5) investigation
by the AG into activities  of other market participants and the notice
that other governmental agencies are cooperating -- who are we producing
this  information to and for what purpose; (6) Enron favors public
disclosure of trading data but only if all participants are required to
do so; (7) Enron is a small player in this market and many other market
participants are not involved in the process BPA etc.    PRO:  This
may be the only way to preserve Enron's challenge to the jurisdiction of the
PUC to get this data.  Moreover, in the  current political
environment there is no assurance where this information will be leaked.  It
also makes sense to see what FERC  will do with their published 11/1/00
report on investigation date. Under this option, we file our formal
objections and sit back and  wait.

6. ME TOO
 Upon reflection, we agree with the approach taken by the other
market participants.  We will not produce until the protective order  is
modified and then only data that is within the PUC jurisdiction.  PRO:  This
makes it look like all the market participants are  acting in concert
and really is no different than option 1 above.  Moreover, if you read
Reliant's responses, they appear ready to  turn over financial data if
the protective order is modified. (Terry and Mike Day are both out of their
offices today.)  Note that  Williams is adopting a strategy that says
the PUC needs to go to Superior Court to enforce its subpoena.  This may be
met with  strong opposition by the PUC given their California
constitutional contempt authority.

7. MOVE TO QUASH BEFORE THE ALJ
 Here we would raise all of the arguments that we have about why the
PUC does not have jurisdiction and fight it out on the merits  before the
ALJ.  PRO:  The ALJ is a forum to raise the jurisdictional questions.  It
has the least procedural risks of being  dismissed.  CON:  Reading
the tea leaves, we believe it unlikely that the ALJ will determine that the
PUC has no jurisdiction.
 Moreover, because the PUC has its own constitutionally granted
contempt power, the PUC will take the view (according to Mike  Day) that
they need not go to the Superior Court for enforcement.  They will also take
the view that the Superior Court has no  jurisdiction  to hear our
appeal.  Appeals have to go to the PUC and those orders are appealable at
the Court of Appeal level.   Thus, the only de novo review of our
objections might be at the ALJ level.

8. FILE DECLARATORY RELIEF ACTION IN FEDERAL COURT IN CALIFORNIA
 We would claim federal question jurisdiction under the Federal Power
Act and in particular the provisions of 824(g) under which the PUC
issued its subpoena in part.  The dispute to be decided is whether the PUC
has the jurisdiction to seek the profit and  loss information from the
wholesale market.  The authority for this would be Mississippi Power & Light
v. Mississippi  487 US  354 (bright line between wholesale market regulated
by FERC and the retail market regulated by states); Bristol Energy Corp v.
New Hampshire 13 F.3d 471 (1st Cir. 1994)(federal question whether state
agency can inquire into business and financial data  in the wholesale
market but found no cognizable claim.)  PRO:  The federal forum may be more
even handed than the ALJ, but  the question is whether we can state a
cognizable claim.  There may be greater protections from disclosure of the
information as  well.  CON:  The PUC may continue on a parallel track unless
we are able to obtain injunctive relief.  The PUC might seek  discovery of
the same information in the Federal court proceeding.  We should assume that
this action will trigger the strongest  response from the PUC and/or the AG
in form of further investigations or alternative forums for getting the same
information (e.g  unfair business practice suit, price gouging,
anti-trust etc.).   We should anticipate deposition requests for traders
etc.  By taking  this position, we will clearly be conceding that if
FERC asks for the data it is germane to their authority.

9. SEPARATE RESPONSES/STRATEGIES FOR DIFFERENT ENRON ENTITIES
 It may make some sense to chart a different course for Portland
General, EES and EEMC and continue to produce some data from  those
entities.  PRO:  The information provided for these entities is not likely
to generate profit and loss information that would be  germane to the fight
we are about to engage in (e.g. EES's description of % off tariff rates for
example.)  For Portland General,  Dave Aamodt is out of the office and
not able to participate in any change of direction discussions.

Hope this is helpful.
Thanks
Gary

=======================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of
the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to
postmaster@brobeck.com
BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP
http://www.brobeck.com


----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 01/17/2001 07:41 PM -----

	Steve C Hall
	01/17/2001 06:12 PM

		 To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: It's about time.

---------------------- Forwarded by Steve C Hall/PDX/ECT on 01/17/2001 04:16
PM ---------------------------

<Chris_A_Anderson@calpx.com> on 01/17/2001 04:16:51 PM
To: steve.c.hall@enron.com
cc:

Subject:

(See attached file: CTS Info Guide Version 3_9  (12-8-00) Clean.pdf)

 - CTS Info Guide Version 3_9  (12-8-00) Clean.pdf


Bad development.  We are trying to get Steve an appointment with Smith next
Tuesday.
----- Forwarded by Linda Robertson/NA/Enron on 03/15/2001 03:51 PM -----

	Allison Navin
	03/15/2001 03:46 PM

		 To: Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Senators Dianne Feinstein and Gordon Smith Announce Partnership in
Response to the Western Energy Crisis

Senators Dianne Feinstein and Gordon Smith
Announce Partnership in Response to the Western Energy Crisis
March 15, 2001
Washington, DC - Senators Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) and Gordon Smith (R-OR)
today announced an agreement to introduce bipartisan legislation to restore
stability and reliability to the Western energy market by directing the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to impose a temporary &just and
reasonable8 wholesale rate cap or cost-of-service based rates.
The legislation will also require the states involved in this effort to pass
on the cost of the electricity to retail customers. However, the states would
be able to determine how and when this would be done. In other words,
California could choose to use tiered-pricing, real-time pricing or set a
baseline rate above which prices would be passed through.
&We now have a piece of legislation that can fix the broken electricity
market and provide a period of reliability and stability in wholesale energy
costs,8 Senator Feinstein said.
&FERC has found the wholesale prices being charged in California to be unjust
and unreasonable. This legislation essentially will mandate that once FERC
makes such a finding, the agency will carry out its regulatory role. This is
a $175 million a year agency. It is there to regulate the energy marketplace,
and it should. What the Federal government can do is to provide a period of
reliability and stability at a time of crisis. Unfortunately FERC has refused
to do so.8
&California,s broken electricity market is a result of a flawed 1996
California law that deregulated wholesale costs, but left in place caps on
retail prices. This was coupled with a requirement that the utilities divest
themselves of their generating capacity and buy most of their electricity on
the spot market, where prices have escalated dramatically. In hindsight all
of this came together in a catastrophic scenario, so that today, California
buys electricity at astronomical prices. We believe that FERC needs to act to
help restore reasonable costs and stability to this marketplace.8
&Additionally, this agreement addresses the escalation of natural gas
transportation costs. Last February, FERC began a two-year experiment to lift
the cap on these costs and since that time we have seen the price of natural
gas climb 400 percent higher in Southern California.8 Senator Feinstein
added.
Specifically, the compromise legislation would accomplish the following goals:
Directs FERC to impose a just and reasonable wholesale rate cap, which can be
load-differentiated based on supply and demand, or cost-of-service-based
rates in the Western energy market (Western Systems Coordinating Council,
including Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico,
Oregon, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming.)
Addresses the issue of high natural gas transmission costs by reimposing FERC
tariffs for natural gas transportation into California (FERC Order 637) and
requiring natural gas sellers to declare separately the transportation and
commodity components of the bundled rate for gray market transactions.
Stipulates that the wholesale price cap or cost-of-service based rate will
not apply to wholesale sales for delivery in a state that imposes a price
limit on the sale of electric energy at retail that: precludes a regulated
utility from recovering costs under the price cap or on a cost-of service
based rate; or precludes a regulated utility from paying its bills.
Establishes that the rate-making body of a state can determine how and when
the wholesale rates will be passed on to ratepayers, including the setting of
tiered pricing, real time pricing, and baseline rates. (With respect to the
Bonneville Power Administration, BPA will be encouraged to seek to reduce
rate spikes to economically distressed communities, while ensuring costs are
recovered by the end of the next contract period in 2006.)
Directs that after the date of enactment, utilities cannot be ordered to sell
electricity or natural gas into a state without a determination by the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission that the seller will be paid.
Directs that in the event that a state in the Western energy market does not
meet the criteria described in this agreement, state public utilities
commissions in the Western energy market can ensure that regulated utilities
within their jurisdiction meet demand for electric energy in the utility,s
service area before making sales into any such state.
Establishes that the wholesale rate cap or cost-of-service based rates shall
remain in effect until such time as the market for electric energy in the
western energy market reflects just and reasonable rates, as determined by
the Commission or until March 1, 2003, whichever is earlier.


Oxley and I will come up with a first stab at the option grants.

John


The PRELIMINARY Violation Memos for 11/15/01 have been published and are available for viewing on the ERV: http:\\erv.corp.enron.com - Violation/Notification Memo Section.