-----Original Message-----
From: 	Jamie_K_Schnorf@fpl.com@ENRON   On Behalf Of Jamie_K_Schnorf@fpl.com
Sent:	Monday, March 25, 2002 2:42 PM
To:	Art_R_Morris@fpl.com; Spraggins, Gary; Linhart, Joe; Michael_Jessop@fpl.com; Janzen, Randy; Ronald_Scheirer@fpl.com; TransOKnoms@enogex.com
Cc:	Forbish, Sherry; Greaney, Chris
Subject:	Revised - Lamar Nominations (Mar 26-31)

Attached is the NNG Lamar burn schedule for March 26-31, 2002.  At this
time we plan on 60,000.

Thanks

Jamie Schnorf - FPL
561-625-7032

(See attached file: 0302 Lamar NNG Nomination.xls)
 - 0302 Lamar NNG Nomination.xls


You have been identified as a person who may have contact with power in California.  Based on our receipt of various subpoenas, we will be preserving your past and future electronic mail.  Please be prudent in the circulation of electronic mail relating to your work and activities.  Thank you.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Greaney, Chris
Sent:	Monday, October 08, 2001 8:01 PM
To:	Schoolcraft, Darrell; Walden, Shirley; Adams, Jean; Benningfield, Robert; Forbish, Sherry; Hibbard, Scott; Janzen, Randy; Linhart, Joe; McDaniel, Janet; Scurlock, Debra; Sturr, Kathy; Vaughan, Cara; Woodson, Harry
Subject:	ElPaso Waha Problems

Ron from NNG Gas Control called around 7:00 pm.m informing me that ElPaso has a turbine down creating high pressure, NNG can't deliver the gas at Waha. I confirmed the gas to 0 for the next cycle (eve cycle) in ElPaso. but did not cut any for gas day 10/8/01. The gas for tomorrow is sourcing from Altura so please contact them in the A.M. and let them know the shipper was cut ot zero. Gas Control was able to deliver gas yesterday because the pressure wasn't as high as it is now. Evidently this outage started on the 7th and is scheduled to last through the 12th. NNG probably shouldn't allow nominations at Waha until the outage is completed.
NGTS contract 107848 was the only Shipper nominated for tomorrows gas day. EPNG will try to get the pressure down to allow us to flow to them, but won't know that until later, or tomorrow.
(Reliant has a nom on NNG side, but not in ElPaso' system)

Also, Darrell (the allocatin' dude) decided to allocate Linam Ranch (ID2 cycle) down to 100,000 because they were not making rate since last Friday. In cutting the Linam Ranch Point the Hobbs system Group was not allocated on the ID2 cycle.

so far my first night back has been rather exicting!!


The following file contains a graphical view of the North American Gas average deal count by Trader and Product for EOL. This information is for comparative analysis only.  Do not update links when opening this file.

If you have any questions regarding this breakout, please let me know .

Thanks,
Adam Johnson
x54877
EnronOnline


Today's IssueAlert Sponsors:

[IMAGE]

The IBM e-Energy Executive Forum ) "Personalization, Partnership, and
Profitability"

Designed for executives in the utility industry looking to leverage Customer
Relationship Management in the competitive marketplace. Topics will focus on
how process and technology can be leveraged to gain competitive advantage.
Featured speakers will include IT analysts, solution partners, IBM
executives, and customers including: John Goodman, President of e-Satisfy;
Richard Grimes, Director of CRM Energy Services; David Bonnett, Global
e-Energy Sales Executive, Siebel Systems.

www.ibm.com

Stay on top of the torrent of e-commerce information news and analysis with
SCIENTECH'S E-Commerce InfoGrid.  Get over 100 pages of daily tracked and
verified information regarding what gas, water, electric and utility service
businesses are doing to keep ahead in the e-commerce industry.  Download a
sample at www.ConsultRCI.com or contact Chris Vigil, toll-free at (888)
972-8676 for more information.
[IMAGE]
The most comprehensive, up-to-date map of the North American Power System by
RDI/FT Energy is now available from SCIENTECH.

[IMAGE]

IssueAlert for  March 29, 2001

California Regulators Approve Massive Rate Increase:
Who Benefits and Who Doesn't?

by Will McNamara
Director, Electric Industry Analysis

California regulators earlier this week approved electricity rate increases
topping 40 percent, the largest in the state's history. The California Public
Utilities Commission (CPUC) voted unanimously to raise rates by 3 cents /
KWh. The rate hikes, which take effect immediately but won't appear on
customer bills until May, apply to millions of customers of Southern
California Edison and Pacific Gas and Electric, the state's two largest
utilities. Low-income residents are exempt from the increases.

Analysis: For context, keep in mind that it was only two months ago that the
CPUC approved its first rate increase in response to the staggering debt of
SCE and PGOand other factors related to the California energy crisis.  In
early January, the CPUC approved temporary rate hikes of 9 percent for
residential customers (about $5 a month for the average customer) and 7 to 15
percent for businesses. The temporary increases were only to remain in effect
for 90 days and will be expiring shortly. At that time, both PGOand SCE
denounced the temporary increase, which was not surprising considering that
the 9 to 15 percent increase was much lower than the utilities had requested
(PGOasked for a 26-percent increase and SCE had asked for 30 percent). The
January rate increase was followed by an additional 10-percent increase that
is set to take effect next year.

The CPUC's current ruling increases rates by about 42 percent at SCE and 46
percent at PG&E. However, the CPUC's measure will most likely serve to
benefit the state more than SCE or PG&E. The CPUC clearly established that
none of the additional revenue earned from the rate increases can be used by
the utilities to pay for past power purchase costs, which have amounted to
about $13 billion. In addition, the CPUC adopted a proposal by consumer group
Toward Utility Rate Normalization (TURN) that a rate cap preventing the
utilities from charging market rates should be extended. In other words, the
portion of the electric rates that PGOand SCE actually receive from
ratepayers will remain frozen for the foreseeable future. The CPUC has
established that the utilities must still recover billions of dollars in
stranded costs before the rate freeze can be lifted.

Thus, it appears that most of the revenue accumulated from the rate increases
will be used to reimburse the state of California for the power purchases it
continues to make on behalf of the utilities and will not be used to pay off
any existing debt held by the utilities. PGOalready has responded that the
CPUC ruling attempts to "completely change the ratemaking rules that are used
to determine the end of the rate freeze under AB1890." PGOhas said that it
will challenge this and other aspects of the CPUC ruling.

However, even though most of the money from the rate increases will go to the
state, it is also not presently clear if the increases will be sufficient to
reimburse California for the $4 billion it has already spent to procure
power, or compensate for the anticipated $14 billion that it will have to pay
for power this year. Some of the funds generated by the rate increases must
be used by PGOand SCE to pay for power that they still obtain from suppliers
or to cover costs for their own power generation. Consequently, the CPUC has
left open the possibility that additional rate increases may be necessary.

Although it is still being evaluated how individual customer classes will be
impacted by the rate increases, it is fairly clear that large commercial and
industrial customers will end up paying the most.  Loretta Lynch, president
of the CPUC, maintained that an underlying goal of the increase is to force
what she referred to as "electricity hogs," or those people who excessively
use power without concern for the state's supply shortage, to conserve. Lynch
has said that conservation is the key to staving off additional rate hikes,
and that the higher rates should put financial pressure on Californians to
conserve energy, which theoretically should help to reduce the risk of
blackouts in the state this summer. The average residential cost for a
kilowatt hour is about 12.5 cents for SCE customers and 10.5 cents for
PGOcustomers. The new rate increase will add about 3 cents / KWh for the
customers of both utilities, which as noted averages out to about a
42-percent increase at SCE and a 46-percent increase at PGO(for electricity
alone).

However, Lynch also established that a "tiered" pricing structure, which has
yet to be fully determined, will be put into place. The tiered pricing system
will reward customers who conserve energy and penalize those who do not.
Essentially this means that those customers who use the most power will
ultimately pay the most, and could face additional rate increases this year,
which the CPUC did not rule out as a possibility. Under a tiered pricing
structure, those customers who conserve on their power usage may not see
their bills increase beyond the rate increase approved this week.

The CPUC also ruled that PGOand SCE must pay small independent generators in
the state (known as qualifying facilities) for energy within 15 days of
delivery. Over the last week, California has again issued Stage 3
emergencies, signaling that power reserves have fallen to dangerously low
levels. Contributing to the problem is the fact that QFs have stopped
producing in recent weeks as a result of the financial problems of PGOand SCE
and the fact that they have been paid only a small percentage of what they
are owed for power previously produced. Under normal circumstances, the QFs
can generate as much as 30 percent of the state's electricity needs. The CPUC
ruled that PGOand SCE must pay the QFs within 15 days of the end of a billing
period, or suffer from penalties equal to the amount of their outstanding
payment.

Gray Davis, who throughout his tenure as California's governor assured
Californians that rates would not be increased, attempted to distance himself
from the CPUC's ruling, and in fact issued a statement that he has no control
over the commission's decision. Further, Davis said that the rate increase
was "premature" because the state is still evaluating the financial numbers
that are needed to make a sound decision. In turn, the CPUC's Lynch
criticized both the governor and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
(FERC) for "failing to act" on energy rates up to this point.

In addition to its comments regarding the rate freeze, PGOresponded with a
mixed reaction to the CPUC's ruling on the rate increase. On one hand, the
utility said the ruling offered a "welcome dose of realism." However, the
utility also said that the rate increase "does not offer a comprehensive
solution, fails to resolve the uncertainty of the crisis and may even create
more instability." Based on previous statements that PGOhas made, the utility
believes that the state's fundamental problem has its origins in the
wholesale market, where prices have often exceeded $300/MWh.

Some power generators, many of whom have been lambasted by California and
federal regulators for alleged price gouging, went on record with a favorable
response to the rate increases. Jeffrey Skilling, Enron's CEO, said, "There's
been a need to balance supply and demand [in California] and to date I don't
think anyone has been willing to let the prices rise to help balance supply
and demand. So [the increases] are a huge step forward in reducing the odds
of shortfalls."  Keith Bailey, chairman and CEO of Williams, told Reuters
that he thought the CPUC's rate increase was a rational decision and
something that the industry has been suggesting for some time.

Naturally, many consumer activists reacted vehemently against the rate
increases and protested during the CPUC's proceedings. The main argument of
the consumer groups is that the CPUC, the governor and FERC have not
fulfilled their regulatory responsibilities in bringing down electricity
prices in the state and have not acted with enough force to restrict what
they perceive as excessive prices for power owned by out-of-state generators.
This position gained momentum last week when the California ISO reported that
electricity wholesalers overcharged state utilities by $5.5 billion over the
past 10 months. Consumer groups also continue to oppose any sort of a
bail-out for PGOand SCE and believe that the utilities have hidden money
under the protection of other subsidiaries within their parent companies.
Both utilities maintain that any financial restructuring activities they have
implemented have been legal.

Moreover, while the rate increases may help the state to continue securing
power on behalf of the utilities, other fundamental problems related to the
state's energy crisis remain unresolved. The CPUC has asserted that part of
the benefit of the rate increases is to keep the utilities financially
solvent. However, at the same time, the commission clearly states that none
of the extra revenue generated by the rate hikes can be used to pay down the
utilities' outstanding debt. Consequently, although the higher rates should
significantly increase revenues for both utilities ($2.3 billion a year for
SCE and $2.5 billion a year for PG&E), all of this money apparently will be
turned over to the state and do little to alleviate the utilities' own
financial problems. This issue still remains unresolved and under the domain
of the state legislature. However, the likelihood that PGOand SCE would need
to declare bankruptcy remains strong (unless additional rate increases or
securitization takes place). In addition, other fundamental problems such as
the supply / demand imbalance in California and the related volatility of the
state's wholesale market continue to wreak havoc on the market's
stakeholders. While the CPUC's rate increases may be a positive step toward
stabilizing the state's financial, the future remains quite uncertain for
PGOand SCE.

An archive list of previous IssueAlerts is available at
www.ConsultRCI.com

Reach thousands of utility analysts and decision makers every day. Your
company can schedule a sponsorship of IssueAlert by contacting Nancy Spring
via e-mail or calling (505)244-7613. Advertising opportunities are also
available on our website.
SCIENTECH is pleased to provide you with your free,  daily IssueAlert. Let us
know if we can help you with  in-depth analyses or any other SCIENTECH
information  products. If you would like to refer a colleague to receive our
free,  daily IssueAlerts, please reply to this email and include  their full
name and email address or register directly on our site.

If you no longer wish to receive this daily email, send a message to
IssueAlert, and include the word "delete" in the subject line.
SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts(SM) are compiled based on the  independent analysis
of SCIENTECH consultants. The opinions expressed in  SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts
are not intended to predict financial performance  of companies discussed, or
to be the basis for investment decisions of any  kind. SCIENTECH's sole
purpose in publishing its IssueAlerts is to offer  an independent perspective
regarding the key events occurring in the  energy industry, based on its
long-standing reputation as an expert on  energy issues.

Copyright 2001. SCIENTECH, Inc. All rights  reserved.


my place.  so you can meet us there or i can get your name on the list.  i
can definately get you in no matter what so if you don't want to go that
early you dont have to.  let me know.  i am going to wear my cowboy hat and
my bolla tie.


Mike,
can you check and see which of these are in maricopa and prioritize them?  also, if you want to go to the cec thing go ahead. i'm skipping it.

http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:Fb-GAXyGldw:www.tucsoncitizen.com/local/7_25_01power_side2.html+maricopa+county+power+plants&hl=en

Power plants planned or under construction in Arizona

July 25, 2001
 1. Griffith Energy Project
 Location: 8 miles south of Kingman
 Size: 530 megawatts
 Cost: $275 million
 Water: 3,060 acre-feet/year groundwater may lower water table 80 feet over useful life.
 Status: APPROVED in December 1998 and under construction
 2. Desert Basin
 Location: Casa Grande
 Size: 500 megawatts
 Cost: $260 million
 Water: Reclaimed waste water and purchase water from a local plant with CAP allocation.
 Status: APPROVED July 1999 and approved for construction.
 3. West Phoenix
 Location: 43rd Avenue and Hadley Road
 Size: 500 megawatts
 Cost: $220 million
 Water: 3,300 acre-feet/year from existing wells; will recycle for discharge.
 Status: APPROVED February 2000
 4. Red Hawk
 Location: 1 mile south of Palo Verde
 Size: 2,120 megawatts
 Cost: $1 billion
 Water: 13,300 acre-feet/year 90 percent recycled waste water from Palo Verde. Will use less than 1,000 acre-feet/year of groundwater.
 When: Late 2000
 Status: APPROVED February 2000
 5. Harquahala
 Location: West of Wintersberg
 Size: 1,040 megawatts
 Cost: $400 million
 Water: 6,000 acre-feet/year. CAP surface water with groundwater backup (if 100 percent groundwater is used, the water would draw down 15 to 25 feet in 40 years).
 Status: APPROVED June 2000
 6. Arlington
 Location: 15 miles southwest of Buckeye
 Size: 580 megawatts
 Cost: $250 million
 Water: 4,500 acre-feet/year of groundwater.
 When: February 2001
 Status: APPROVED July 2000, scheduled for completion this year.
 7. Gila River
 Location: 3 miles northeast Gila Bend
 Size: 2,080 megawatts
 Cost: $500 million-$1 billion
 Water: 10,000 gallons/minute
 When: Late 2000
 Status: APPROVED June 2000
 8. South Point
 Location: 28 miles south of Bullhead City
 Size: 500 megawatts
 Cost: $275 million
 Water: NA
 When: Construction began November 1999
 Status: Under construction on Fort Mohave Indian Reservation. Did not need approval of Arizona Power Plant and Transmission Line Siting Committee or Arizona Corporation Commission because plant is being built on reservation.
 9. Kyrene
 Location: 7005 S. Kyrene Road in Tempe
 Size: 250 megawatts
 Cost: N/A
 Water: 1,600-acre feet per year. Uses SRP surface water or city of Tempe effluent.
 Status: APPROVED November 2000 and proposed to be up and running in 2002
 10. Santan
 Location: Gilbert
 Size: 825 megawatts, using three combined-cycle gas-turbine engines and delivering power through existing local transmission lines
 Cost: $410 million-$430 million.
 Water: Expects to use combination of surface water from Salt and Verde rivers from the town of Gilbert, excess Colorado River water from the town of Gilbert or another supplier of groundwater.
 Status: APPROVED November 2000, expected to be operational in 2005
 11. Gila Bend
 Location: 6 miles northwest Gila Bend
 Size: 845 megawatts
 Cost: $400 million
 Water: 5,000 acre-feet/year
 When: Construction to begin late 2001
 Status: APPROVED April 2001, construction scheduled to begin later this year.
 12. Big Sandy
 Location: 4 miles southeast of Wikiup
 Size: 720 megawatts, natural gas fired combined cycle turbines
 Cost: $425 million
 Water: 3,200 acre-feet per year of groundwater
 When: Construction for Phase I anticipated to begin July 2002
 Status: Application filed with Arizona Power Plant & Line Siting Committee on March 29, 2000.
 13. Mesquite Generating Station
 Location: Western Maricopa County, near Arlington
 Size: 1,265 megawatts, natural gas-fired combined-cycle gas turbines
 Cost: $480 million
 Water: Total water usage estimated to be 7,490 acre-feet per year. The property comes with agricultural water rights of about 15,000 acre-feet per year. Conversion of the agricultural water rights in accordance with Arizona Department of Water Resources policies results in a reduction to approximately 8,000 acre-feet per year of Type 1 industrial groundwater rights.
 When: Construction expected to begin in the second quarter of 2001.
 Status: APPROVED December 2000. Construction to begin in second quarter of 2001.
 14. La Paz
 Location: La Paz County, 75 miles west of Phoenix
 Size: 1,080 megawatts, natural gas-fired combined-cycle gas turbines
 Cost: $540 million
 Status: Press release announcing these plans dated Oct. 17, 2000
 15. Montezuma Energy Project
 Location: Near Mobile, in Maricopa County
 Size: 520 megawatts, natural gas-fired combined-cycle gas turbines
 Status: Plans announced in late October 2000.
 16. Toltec Power Station
 Location: Near Eloy, south of Casa Grande
 Size: 2,000 megawatts, natural gas-fired combined-cycle gas turbines
 Cost: $1 billion
 When: To be constructed in phases. First phase scheduled for completion in 2003.
 Status: Hearings before the Arizona Power Plant & Transmission Line Siting Committee started May 10.
 17. Sundance Energy Project (Peaker)
 Location: Private lands in Pinal County near Coolidge
 Size: 600-megawatt natural gas-fired simple-cycle peaking facility
 Water: Estimated at 600 acre- feet per year of surface water from the Central Arizona Project from an existing irrigation canal or a new groundwater well or combination of both.
 Status: Plant is projected to run approximately 2,000 hours per year. Hearing held in December 2000 in Coolidge. Approved by Arizona Power Plant & Line Siting Committee. Pending hearing before the Arizona Corporation Commission.
 18. Beaver Dam Power Project
 Location: Northwest Arizona in Mohave County near Littlefield
 Size: 500-megawatt combined-cycle natural gas
 Status: Plans announced in November 2000, to be operational in 2003.
 19. Maestros Group Nogales Project
 Location: Nogales
 Size: 500-megawatt natural gas-fired plant
 Cost: $250 million plus transmission costs; total estimated at $315 million
 Water: Plans to use treated effluent; consumption estimated at 3 million gallons per day
 Status: Plans announced in November 2000.
 20. Springerville Plant Expansion
 This plant may have been approved as a four-unit plant originally. May not need to go through Arizona Power Plant and Transmission Line Siting Committee process. Two 380-megawatt units already exist at Springerville.
 Location: Springerville
 Size: Two new 380-megawatt coal-fired generators
 When: To be placed in service in 2004 and 2005
 Status: Plans announced Feb. 1, and to be in service by 2005
 21. Yuma Power Project
 Location: East of Ligurta
 Size: 520 megawatts
 Cost: $300 million
 Water: Colorado River water
 Status: Recently announced

<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>


As of 5:30 today, the EFM spot group had another record day.  123 loads, 288 transactions.

I talked to them this morning and reminded them that any value in the business will disappear unless they continue to grow volumes.  They hit it out of the park.

If you get the chance to stop by tomorrow and let them know you are paying attention I think that would do a lot for morale.  Keeping up activity in this atmosphere is remarkable, and they deserve some recognition.  The only upside for them at this point is being sold and getting Enron back part or all of its investment.

thanks,

dan


I am so sorry about the fire.  That must be awful -- but I am so glad that no
one was hurt.  I had not heard about it until Mo called me today.  Please let
me know if there is anything that I can do.  Do you need me to get you
anything over here and ship it to London?

I can certainly understand that you will reconsider the trip to Houston next
week.  I know that you must have hundreds of details to handle.

My plan right now is to be off the week of Thanksgiving.   My nanny will be
on vacation that whole week so that she can make a trip out of town.  I may
do some work early in the week, but likely from home.  The week after
Thanksgiving I am supposed go to Wellesley College (Boston area) to interview
for the analyst program.  I am due at a reception on Monday night (November
27) and I will interview on Tuesday (November 28).  Assuming that I can get a
flight back on Tuesday night, I will be in the office here in Houston
Wednesday through Friday that week.  Would that work?  Sorry I am out so much
in the next few weeks.  Just let me know.  --Sally


Chris--Attached is our requested volumes for 3/9 (intraday) and 3/10.

Doug Kinney
Ph:  703-561-6339
Fax:  703-561-7317

 - 03-09-00 Daily volsAM.xls


I can call you when I get out of my meeting, but it might be awhile.  Or, it
might be 600.  Dunno.

"Neil Mann" <nmann@erac.com> on 09/26/2000 04:41:56 PM
Please respond to <nmann@erac.com>
To: <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: RE: SF

I just left a vm for Carrie explaining what I would like to do. I will leave
you a vm as to the outcome. Sushi sounds good to me. NM

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2000 4:01 PM
To: nmann@erac.com
Subject: RE: SF

Sounds fine to me.  I would suggest new sushi place if I knew when we would
be getting out.

I haven't heard from Carrie Burton.  I'm on the phone.  If you would like
to call her, St. Francis number is 713 782 0481.

Kay

"Neil Mann" <nmann@erac.com> on 09/26/2000 03:34:44 PM

Please respond to <nmann@erac.com>

To:   <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject:  RE: SF

Just let me know before 5 and I will pick it up.
My day? I feel like I lost control of Loss Control about 9am. Is it a full
moon?
Think you will feel like steak after your meeting with the big guys or
would
you prefer something else?

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2000 2:44 PM
To: nmann@erac.com
Subject: SF

Carrie Burton (works for Sallie Ellis) left a message that it would be a
good idea for us to pick up a packet today.  I was hoping that it would be
ready so I could pick it up a lunch, but it wasn't.  If I hear from her I
will ask how late someone can pick it up, or maybe they can leave it at the
Children's Center since they don't close until 600.

How is your day?

I have a 500 meeting with the big boys.

Love,

Kay


Take advantage of the following courses remaining for 2001.

Electric Business Understanding - November 27
The Electric Business Understanding Seminar will give a basic overview of the electric business for those with limited knowledge of this industry. This seminar is recommended for entry level to mid-level employees in either the gas or electric business or in businesses providing services to these industries.

Understanding Swaps - November 8 & 9 and December 13 & 14
This course is appropriate for all employees wishing to obtain a practical understanding of the basic natural gas and power derivative structures that are traded and marketed today. An emphasis is placed on understanding how financial tools are added to physical structures to meet the risk management needs of clients.

Understanding Options - November 27 & 28 and December 18 & 19
This course builds on our Derivatives 1 program and is appropriate for all employees looking to extend their knowledge of basic derivatives. Swaps and options are revisited, but from a more sophisticated perspective. Option pricing concepts are approached pragmatically, both from the trading and structuring/marketing perspectives. The program does not involve complex mathematics.

Structuring Natural Gas Transactions - November 19 & 20
This course builds on the DI - Applied Energy Derivatives program, focusing on deal structuring opportunities particular to the Natural Gas markets.  Participants will develop insights into the economic inter-relationships between the physical operations (pipelines, storage, generation, etc.) and their synthetic financial counterparts (basis, time spread and multi-fuel derivatives).  Emphasis is directed at identifying marketing opportunities that follow from these concepts.  This is not an introduction to natural gas markets.

For enrollment, or more information on these courses, please log on to http://elm.enron.com.


Hi Lee,

Here is the new turbine contract, blacklined against the March 27 version.

I look forward to speaking with you soon.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/30/2001 05:48
PM ---------------------------

"Thompson, Peter J." <pthompson@akllp.com> on 03/30/2001 04:02:01 PM
To: "Kay Mann (E-mail)" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc: "Pipitone, Paul" <paulpipitone@akllp.com>

Subject: Salmon Energy Turbine Agreement

 Attached please find a clean copy of the Salmon Energy Turbine
Agreement (the second document below), which includes Lee Johnson's
proposed changes to Section 10.7, as well as a blackline (first document
below) showing changes to the (3/27) version you forwarded earlier
today. I have include notes within the agreement indicationg those
places where questions remain - e.g., how the addition of the new
turbine affects the pricing schedule, guaranteed delivery, etc.
 <<Comparison of Version 5 of the LV Cogen to Version 1 of the Salmon
Energy Agreement.DOC>>  <<Salmon Energy Agreement - Version 2.DOC>>
 - Comparison of Version 5 of the LV Cogen to Version 1 of the Salmon Energy
Agreement.DOC
 - Salmon Energy Agreement - Version 2.DOC


I received a fax in yesterday, so I'll review it.

Kay

From: Ben Jacoby/ENRON@enronXgate on 06/04/2001 12:05 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Fred Mitro/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:

Subject: FW: Midway Toll term sheet & LOI - comments

In a seperate e-mail, I sent out the LOI to TECO which incorporated most of
Fred's comments. On the tolling term sheet, I agree with Fred's comments. Kay
- where do we stand on having outside counsel review this? I have indicated
to TECO that we will have a draft tolling term sheet to them by Wednesday.
Please let me know.

Thanks,

Ben

-----Original Message-----
From: Mitro, Fred
Sent: Fri 6/1/2001 5:56 PM
To: Mann, Kay; Jacoby, Ben
Cc: Kellermeyer, Dave
Subject: Midway Toll term sheet & LOI - comments

Ben/Kay:

Attached are my comments on the Midway Tolling term sheet and LOI.

I will be out on Monday but will have my cell phone on.  My conversations
will be regularly interrupted by golf strokes, but I will do my best to be
available.

Call me if you have specific questions/issues to discuss.  I have asked Dave
Kellermeyer to call either one of you on Monday with an answer to the minimum
block size for the tolling term sheet.  I am taking the air permit home to
review and will leave you a message if I determine the answer.

Fred

 <<Kay Mann Term sheet June 1(fred's marked).doc>>

 <<Kay Mann Tolling Term sheet June 1(Fred'smarked).doc>>


Steve,

What was the Oneok issue?  What does Ann mean by "ETS was releasing gas to Oneok"?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Harris, Steven
Sent:	Friday, March 01, 2002 9:23 AM
To:	Watson, Kimberly; Lokay, Michelle
Subject:	FW: Follow Up - Amarillo Meeting

fyi. I am following -up on this.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Horton, Stanley
Sent:	Thursday, February 28, 2002 6:08 PM
To:	Harris, Steven
Subject:	FW: Follow Up - Amarillo Meeting

Can you follow up on this.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Vaughn, Ann
Sent:	Thursday, February 28, 2002 9:02 AM
To:	Horton, Stanley
Subject:	Follow Up - Amarillo Meeting

Stan................just a reminder to follow up with the commercial group regarding the question about gas going off the system.  While we have capacity, the field doesn't see much happening to bring customers back or to get new customers.  There was also the issue of better communication between the commercial group and the field.  They specifically mentioned a situation with ONEOK.  The customer told the field employees that ETS was releasing gas to them, not our commercial group.

Again...............you did an outstanding job yesterday.


Attached are the current plan & deal status.

 Jim


Hello!

As we enter the new year, I think we should all be reminded of Enron's work
hour policies and the environment in which we operate.

Enron supports and encourages flexible work hours (7:30-4:30, 8:00-5:00,
8:30-5:30, part-time, etc.).  Additionally, the policies allow us generous
personal time, family time, sick leave, vacation time, etc.  We are supported
and encouraged to put our health and families first.

This culture allow us many freedoms, and it does not dictate a
"clock-watcher" mentality.  However, we are all paid to give Enron a minimum
of a 40 hour work week (or some other agreed upon part-time amount).  This 40
hours does not include your lunch hour.

As you are all aware, many of our fellow co-workers on the 30th floor are
required to give much more than 40 hours a week.  Please do not abuse the
privileges we are afforded, and do not tarnish the reputation of our group.

Thanks for all of your hard work and cooperation. . .
Carrie


Please find attached our Weekly Report for 3 August 2000.


I will make the call and research.

Rita

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Corman, Shelley
Sent:	Wednesday, March 06, 2002 8:53 AM
To:	Houston, Rita
Subject:	RE: W-2 Question

Unfortunately I didn't write down the name of the person in payroll that returned my call to the main payroll number.   Whoever it was logged into their system and said that the record showed you making the co. change.  Could you give payroll a call?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Houston, Rita
Sent:	Wednesday, March 06, 2002 8:08 AM
To:	Corman, Shelley
Subject:	RE: W-2 Question
Importance:	High

Shelley,

I have checked the system and find that the only changes made to your record during 2001 are as follows:

1/1/2001 - 4/15/2001 - VP Reg & Gov. Affairs - Co. 0366
4/15/2001 - 12/16/2001 - Title change to VP Gas Logistics - no company change
12/17/2001 - 12/31/2001 - FMLA Leave - no company change

1/1/2002 - to present company change to 179E.

I have nothing indicating a company change for 2001.

Let me know who in payroll you spoke with and maybe I can work with them to determine their conclusion.

Rita

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Houston, Rita
Sent:	Monday, March 04, 2002 1:24 PM
To:	Corman, Shelley
Subject:	RE: W-2 Question

Shelly,

As soon as SAP is back up, I will look to see what the changes made to your record were.   I'm thinking your Tax company is Corp and that perhaps you are listed as deferred comp.  That's just off the top of my head.  Again, once the system is operating again, I will check into this.

Rita

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Corman, Shelley
Sent:	Monday, March 04, 2002 12:50 PM
To:	Houston, Rita
Subject:	W-2 Question

Rita,

I was recently quizzing payroll on why I received two W-2s (which sum in aggregate to my 12/31/01 payroll stub) when I thought had been employed by the same co. (366) all year.  Her records indicated that you had entered a change during the year.  Could you look into why I can listed as having worked for both Enron Operations Services Co & Enron Corp. in 2001?

Shelley Corman
x37083


Mark, Brian, and Steve,
	Further to my conversation two weeks ago with Mark, I would like to schedule a visit to Denver 11/19-20.  As a reminder, Business Controls is looking at the security posture of Enron facilities worldwide.  Currently, we are focusing our resources on domestic sites.  At the moment, I am planning for one of our IT specialists to travel from Portland to assist me with reviewing IT back-up procedures, recovery, and continuity issues.  If I could impose on you to provide some information about the office, it would greatly help in our planning.
	In particular, could you briefly describe the office(s); physical location, which floor, how large, how many employees, and any other Enron subsidiaries or offices in Denver.  Additionally, would you be our point of contact, or can you designate someone?  Thank you in advance for your attention to this matter.

Mark C. Ringwelski
Systems and Architecture
Business Controls
Enron Corporation
Phone: 713/345-4625
Cell:     713/875-1869
FAX:    713/646-8838


i think tom, robbie and i should still try to get down to phoenix for a
weekend.  talk to those two and see when a good weekend is for them.  i am
going to come home in may also for about a week.


Congratulations on the move!  Its great to see a reorg that actually seems to
make so much sense!  Thanks again to you and Terry for watching the three
stooges on Saturday night.  It was great seeing you guys again and getting
the kids a chance to play for a while.  We'd love to return the favor next
time you come up to Omaha--the weather is getting real nice right about
now!!  DF
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 12/05/2000
05:17 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Rick Craig                           12/05/2000 05:06 PM

Sent by: ETS General Announcement
To: Enron Transportation Services Operations, Enron Transportation Services
Human Resources
cc:

Subject: ETS on the Move...

Effective immediately, Joe Jeffers, Manager of Technical Training and Skill
Based Pay Administration, and his team of Dick Heitman, Cliff McPherson,
Andrea Woody and Lupi Trevino will move from ETS Human Resources to ETS
Operations Technical Services.  Joe will report to Steve Klimesh.

This move will better align Technical Training and SBP Administration with
Operations and enhance the interfaces that take place between this group and
ETS Operations management and the field teams.

Joe and his team have provided outstanding support to Operations in the past,
and it is expected that this high standard of customer service will
continue.  We will be sending more information in the very near future with
regard to the individual support accountabilities of the team members.

Please join me in welcoming this team and helping to make their transition a
smooth one.


Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 02/05/2001 05:57 PM -----

	"Olana Gallery" <olana@bestweb.net>
	01/10/2001 10:35 PM

		 To: <sara.shackleton@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Confirm ABE Book Order: Phillip Pavia Exhibition.

 The Advanced Book Exchange has forwarded the following order.
This is only a confirmation of your order ... the book seller will contact
you shortly to confirm this book's availability.  No response is required.

Author...... Pavia, Phillip.
Title....... Phillip Pavia Exhibition.
Publisher... Washington, DC: Washington Gallery of Modern Art. 1966.
BookId...... 1660
Price....... 27.50

ExCat. Paper.
Terms....... Cash with Order, No credit cards
Reternable within 10 days unless other wise noted

To.......... Olana Gallery
2 Carillon Road
Brewster, NY
U.S.A., 10509
(914) 279-8077
Fax......... (914) 279-8079
Email....... olana@bestweb.net

Your comments were as follows:
Is this catalog in stock? What is the condition?  Have you others including
Pavia?
How about Donald Judd or Linda Benglis?

This mail was created 10/Jan/01 20:13 and postmarked 10/Jan/01 20:35.


No need to get hostile - would you like it verbally or orally? (I 'm
referring to the notes)


Andy Fastow and Ben Glisan would like to meet with Greg Whalley and Mark
Frevert this week if possible regarding Global Finance Support.  Please
advise their availability.

Thank you.


See attached

Loss/Limit Notifications:

None

 - DPR 16.xls
 - Power Report 16.xls
 - Gas Report 16.xls


John Odam has asked me to go to lunch w/ his new partners. Would you like to
go? If not, how interested are you in sending them work? I think John is a
great guy but he did a marginal job representing EBS on some litigation I was
managing.
----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 03/07/2001 05:23 PM -----

	"John W. Odam" <johnodam@goforthlewis.com>
	03/07/2001 06:37 PM

		 To: "Richard B. Sanders" <Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Lunch -- John Odam, Dan Goforth and Ted Weise

Richard:? How bout April 4 or 5?? You,  plus whoever else that we discussed
who might be available.? Y'all are our  guests of course.? John Odam


Area		Oct.		YTD
Southeast	-0.05		+0.05
Southwest	-0.71		-0.05
North		+0.08		-0.02

Total		-0.47		-0.02


---------------------- Forwarded by Bryan Hull/HOU/ECT on 12/05/2000 10:48 AM
---------------------------

"Sharon Hull" <hullkron@bellsouth.net> on 12/05/2000 10:46:32 AM
Please respond to "Sharon Hull" <hullkron@bellsouth.net>
To: "david pere" <rcpere@acadiacom.net>, "gwen kizorek"
<gkizorek@rtcind.com>, "Ronda Jenkins" <rondaj@hotmail.com>,
<Hunterkron@aol.com>, "ron hull" <ronknee014@juno.com>, "Bryan Hull"
<bryan.hull@enron.com>, "Mary Cooney" <mpbc51@hotmail.com>, "Albert C Boyd"
<acboyd@bellsouth.net>, "keith bird" <kbirds@bellsouth.net>
cc:
Subject: Fw: See This!

----- Original Message -----
From: s <skiles@bellsouth.net>
To: allison <alskiles@yahoo.com>; <andrea2343@aol.com>; barbara
<auntbee@cs.com>; Beverly Stavley <bstavley@ak.net>; deana
<DSkiles975@aol.com>; frank <franklin.skiles@columbia.net>; frank
<oltimindud@aol.com>; frank & bridget <fbskiles@bellsouth.net>; jo
<jskiles2@grics.net>; Kenny B. <kbrandt@sanasys.com>; lynn
<LNunez1557@aol.com>; mary <QCreole48@aol.com>; mary <Hunterkron@aol.com>;
meghan rannow <nutmegn@yahoo.com>; michael rannow <moto_miker@yahoo.com>;
Rhonda Rannow <rhondaquilts@yahoo.com>; Ryan  Nunez <nryan11996@yahoo.com>;
Sharon Hull <hullkron@bellsouth.net>; Tara Nunez <taranunez@hotmail.com>;
Lisa Brown <shelby6596@msn.com>
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2000 10:27 PM
Subject: See This!

> http://www.dovewinds.com/dubya/alshokeypokey.html
>
>


Second part - too large to send the first round

Katie Kaplan
Manager of State Policy Affairs
Independent Energy Producers Association
(916) 448-9499

-----Original Message-----
From: Katie Kaplan [mailto:kaplan@iepa.com]
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2001 4:06 PM
To: 'Katie Kaplan'; 'Alex Sugaoka (E-mail)'; 'Bill Carlson (E-mail)'; 'Bill
Woods (E-mail)'; 'Bob Ellery (E-mail)'; 'Bob Escalante (E-mail)'; 'Bob Gates
(E-mail)'; 'Carolyn A Baker (E-mail)'; 'Cody Carter (E-mail)'; 'Curt Hatton
(E-mail)'; 'Curtis Kebler (E-mail)'; 'David Parquet'; 'Dean Gosselin
(E-mail)'; 'Doug Fernley (E-mail)'; 'Douglas Kerner (E-mail)'; 'Duane Nelsen
(E-mail)'; 'Ed Tomeo (E-mail)'; 'Eileen Koch (E-mail)'; 'Eric Eisenman
(E-mail)'; 'Frank DeRosa (E-mail)'; Frazier Blaylock (E-mail); 'Greg Blue
(E-mail)'; 'Hap Boyd (E-mail)'; 'Hawks Jack (E-mail)'; 'Jack Pigott
(E-mail)'; 'Jim Willey (E-mail)'; 'Joe Greco (E-mail)'; 'Joe Ronan
(E-mail)'; 'John Stout (E-mail)'; 'Jonathan Weisgall (E-mail)'; 'Kate
Castillo (E-mail)'; 'Kelly Lloyd (E-mail)'; 'Ken Hoffman (E-mail)'; 'Kent
Fickett (E-mail)'; 'Kent Palmerton'; 'Lynn Lednicky (E-mail)'; 'Marty
McFadden (E-mail)'; 'Paula Soos'; 'Randy Hickok (E-mail)'; Rick S. Koebbe
(E-mail); 'Roger Pelote (E-mail)'; 'Ross Ain (E-mail)'; 'Stephanie Newell
(E-mail)'; 'Steve Iliff'; 'Steve Ponder (E-mail)'; 'Susan J Mara (E-mail)';
'Tony Wetzel (E-mail)'; 'William Hall (E-mail)'; 'Alan Comnes'; 'Alex Makler
(E-mail)'; 'Allen Jensen (E-mail)'; 'Andy Gilford (E-mail)'; 'Armen
Arslanian (E-mail)'; 'Bert Hunter'; 'Bill Adams (E-mail)'; 'Bill Barnes
(E-mail)'; 'Bo Buchynsky (E-mail)'; Bob Szymanski (E-mail); Bob Tormey
(E-mail); 'Charles Johnson (E-mail)'; 'Charles Linthicum (E-mail)'; 'D.
Fellman'; 'Diane Fellman (E-mail)'; 'Don Scholl (E-mail)'; Doug Levitt
(E-mail); 'Ed Maddox (E-mail)'; 'Edward Lozowicki (E-mail)'; 'Edwin Feo
(E-mail)'; 'Eric Edstrom (E-mail)'; 'Floyd Gent (E-mail)'; 'Hal Dittmer
(E-mail)'; 'Janet Heck Doyle (E-mail)'; 'John O'Rourke'; 'Kawamoto, Wayne';
'Ken Salvagno (E-mail)'; 'Kent Burton (E-mail)'; 'Larry Kellerman'; 'Lucian
Fox (E-mail)'; 'Mark Fillinger'; 'Mark J. Smith (E-mail)'; 'Mike Hawkins
(E-mail)'; 'Milton Schultz (E-mail)'; 'Nam Nguyen (E-mail)'; 'Paul Wood
(E-mail)'; 'Pete Levitt (E-mail)'; 'Peter H. Weiner'; 'Phil Reese (E-mail)';
'Robert Frees (E-mail)'; 'Scott Harlan (E-mail)'; 'Tandy McMannes (E-mail)';
'Ted Cortopassi (E-mail)'; 'Thomas Heller (E-mail)'; 'Thomas Swank'; 'Tom
Hartman (E-mail)'; 'Ward Scobee (E-mail)'; 'D. Frank (E-mail)'; 'David
Dickey (E-mail)'; 'Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)'; 'Julie Simon (E-mail)'; 'Rich
Dyer (E-mail)'
Cc: Andy Brown (E-mail); 'Carol Hudson (E-mail)'; 'Jan Smutny-Jones
(E-mail)'; 'Steven Kelly (E-mail)'
Subject: RE: Loretta Lynch's press conference

Proposed and alternative decisions for tomorrow as well as E&S summary memo
for today's press conference

Katie Kaplan
Manager of State Policy Affairs
Independent Energy Producers Association
(916) 448-9499

-----Original Message-----
From: Katie Kaplan [mailto:kaplan@iepa.com]
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2001 11:15 AM
To: 'Alex Sugaoka (E-mail)'; 'Bill Carlson (E-mail)'; 'Bill Woods (E-mail)';
'Bob Ellery (E-mail)'; 'Bob Escalante (E-mail)'; 'Bob Gates (E-mail)';
'Carolyn A Baker (E-mail)'; 'Cody Carter (E-mail)'; 'Curt Hatton (E-mail)';
'Curtis Kebler (E-mail)'; 'David Parquet'; 'Dean Gosselin (E-mail)'; 'Doug
Fernley (E-mail)'; 'Douglas Kerner (E-mail)'; 'Duane Nelsen (E-mail)'; 'Ed
Tomeo (E-mail)'; 'Eileen Koch (E-mail)'; 'Eric Eisenman (E-mail)'; 'Frank
DeRosa (E-mail)'; Frazier Blaylock (E-mail); 'Greg Blue (E-mail)'; 'Hap Boyd
(E-mail)'; 'Hawks Jack (E-mail)'; 'Jack Pigott (E-mail)'; 'Jim Willey
(E-mail)'; 'Joe Greco (E-mail)'; 'Joe Ronan (E-mail)'; 'John Stout
(E-mail)'; 'Jonathan Weisgall (E-mail)'; 'Kate Castillo (E-mail)'; 'Kelly
Lloyd (E-mail)'; 'Ken Hoffman (E-mail)'; 'Kent Fickett (E-mail)'; 'Kent
Palmerton'; 'Lynn Lednicky (E-mail)'; 'Marty McFadden (E-mail)'; 'Paula
Soos'; 'Randy Hickok (E-mail)'; Rick S. Koebbe (E-mail); 'Rob Lamkin
(E-mail)'; 'Roger Pelote (E-mail)'; 'Ross Ain (E-mail)'; 'Stephanie Newell
(E-mail)'; 'Steve Iliff'; 'Steve Ponder (E-mail)'; 'Susan J Mara (E-mail)';
'Tony Wetzel (E-mail)'; 'William Hall (E-mail)'; 'Alan Comnes'; 'Alex Makler
(E-mail)'; 'Allen Jensen (E-mail)'; 'Andy Gilford (E-mail)'; 'Armen
Arslanian (E-mail)'; 'Bert Hunter'; 'Bill Adams (E-mail)'; 'Bill Barnes
(E-mail)'; 'Bo Buchynsky (E-mail)'; Bob Szymanski (E-mail); Bob Tormey
(E-mail); 'Charles Johnson (E-mail)'; 'Charles Linthicum (E-mail)'; 'D.
Fellman'; 'Diane Fellman (E-mail)'; 'Don Scholl (E-mail)'; Doug Levitt
(E-mail); 'Ed Maddox (E-mail)'; 'Edward Lozowicki (E-mail)'; 'Edwin Feo
(E-mail)'; 'Eric Edstrom (E-mail)'; 'Floyd Gent (E-mail)'; 'Hal Dittmer
(E-mail)'; 'Janet Heck Doyle (E-mail)'; 'John O'Rourke'; 'Kawamoto, Wayne';
'Ken Salvagno (E-mail)'; 'Kent Burton (E-mail)'; 'Larry Kellerman'; 'Lucian
Fox (E-mail)'; 'Mark Fillinger'; 'Mark J. Smith (E-mail)'; 'Mike Hawkins
(E-mail)'; 'Milton Schultz (E-mail)'; 'Nam Nguyen (E-mail)'; 'Paul Wood
(E-mail)'; 'Pete Levitt (E-mail)'; 'Peter H. Weiner'; 'Phil Reese (E-mail)';
'Robert Frees (E-mail)'; 'Scott Harlan (E-mail)'; 'Tandy McMannes (E-mail)';
'Ted Cortopassi (E-mail)'; 'Thomas Heller (E-mail)'; 'Thomas Swank'; 'Tom
Hartman (E-mail)'; 'Ward Scobee (E-mail)'; 'D. Frank (E-mail)'; 'David
Dickey (E-mail)'; 'Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)'; 'Julie Simon (E-mail)'; 'Rich
Dyer (E-mail)'
Subject: Loretta Lynch's press conference

Greetings:
Here is a quick summary:

Loretta Lynch is having a press conference right now in which she has
outlined the 4 decisions that will come before the commission tomorrow.  We
are listening in and trying to get our hands on the materials.  When we get
them we will send them out.
The four items are:
1) Order the IOU's to pay the QF's going forward starting April 1, 2001
a. Treatment of payments would modify 390
i. Shift the index from Topck (because it has been gammed) it will be moved
to Malin (which is lower)
ii. Heat rate/ O&M may be addressed through workshops
iii. Withdrawing for long term fixed price proposal
b. Legislation solution has broken down and this is why they must act
c. Wood's proposed decision due out today (He indicates most QF's do not
need to withhold- and it is difficult to tell.  This withholding by the QF's
resulted in the recent blackouts
2) Instruct the IOU's to pay CDWR for all past due amounts in which they
have purchased for the IOU's net short position based on a formula by amount
of energy purchased * specified dollar amount (it is unclear what this is)
3) As a result of increasing power prices Lynch proposes to increase
residential and commercial rates by 3 cents per KWh.  This will not be voted
upon tomorrow and this proposal will "jump start the process"
a. This will not affect all the CARE customers and anyone who uses under
130% of baseline. If you use under 200% of baseline the increase is only 9%.
b. Authorization to collect more $ will begin on March 27th.  Authorization
to receive more money for power purchases and once they receive the data
from CDWR than they will determine which part of that will be allocated to
the state.
4) Investigation into the IOU's holding companies and that data from them
needs to become available to the commission with in 10 days.
She blamed FERC for sleeping on the job and said if these (any # of them)
investigations into unjust and unreasonable rates result in a favorable
outcome for the state than there will be a refund.

"FERC needs to see the light"

Katie Kaplan
Manager of State Policy Affairs
Independent Energy Producers Association
(916) 448-9499

 - 5954_.doc


In case this becomes big news in the United States, attached is a summary
from the Argentina team of the political situation in Argentina.  It is not a
political meltdown but it is a significant change in the executive branch and
potential realignment of the political parties in Argentina.  The cabinet
shuffle and resignation of the vice president are in the wake of the senate
bribery scandal in Argentina where the opposition was supposedly bribed to
vote for the governments changes in law (actually in favor of economic
reform).  The cabinet shuffle was economics oriented with the economic team
being strengthened, but potentially at the expense of the alliance that holds
the government and a majority in Congress over Menem's party, the peronists.
The vice president was the senior member of the second party in the alliance
(President De La Rua is senior member of the first party in the alliance).
Financial markets reacted slightly negatively to the shakeup with bond
spreads widening slightly and Argentine stock prices down slightly.  As a
minimum we will keep a close eye on the political and financial situation and
be prepared for any more significant reaction by the financial markets.
---------------------- Forwarded by James M Bannantine/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
10/08/2000 07:04 PM ---------------------------

Don Black@ENRON
10/07/2000 08:16 AM
To: James M Bannantine/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Joe Kishkill/SA/Enron@Enron, Diomedes Christodoulou/SA/Enron@Enron, Peter
E Weidler/NA/Enron@Enron, Michael Guerriero/SA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Argentina Political Analysis

Mike,
Thanks for the quick turnaround on this from you and your team.

Jim,
This is as far as this distribution went.  Please edit as needed and forward
to whomever you feel necessary.
---------------------- Forwarded by Don Black/SA/Enron on 10/07/2000 11:07 AM
---------------------------
From: Michael Guerriero on 10/07/2000 10:13 AM
To: Don Black/SA/Enron@Enron
cc: Guillermo Canovas/SA/Enron@Enron, Cristian Folgar/SA/Enron@Enron, Maria
Belen Salvador/SA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Argentina Political Analysis

As reported Carlos Chacho Alvarez resigned his position Friday as Vice
president of Argentina.

The main reason of this resignation was a political disagreement with Cabinet
changes announced on Thursday 5th by President De la Rua.  Alvarez
publicly noted he could no longer tolerate the political differences with the
President over the senate bribery scandal. Particularly Alvarez disagreed
with De la Rua's decision to promote Alberto Flamarique from Minister of
Labor to General Secretary and to keep Fernando de Santibaez as Chief of the
Intelligence Department.  Both Flamarique and Santibaez are suspected of
paying bribes to Senators to vote for a new Labor Law. Alvarez has
emotionally championed the fight against the senate scandal and has been
strongly advocating for the resignation of Flamarique, Santibaez and all
Senators involved in the affair.

It was considered that the decision of De la R?a was intended to demonstrate
that he, and not Alvarez, holds the power and that De la R?a wanted to
demonstrate that the changes were focused on improving the economic situation
and to move beyond the Senate scandal.

The main changes in the cabinet, announced on Thursday 5th, are the following:
Chistian Colombo (economist, in good relationship with Machinea) will replace
Terragno as Chief of Cabinet.
Machinea (Minister of Economy) will also be responsible of the Ministry of
Infrastructure.
Jorge De la R?a (former General Secretary of the President and President's
brother) will be Minister of Justice.
Patricia Bullrich (peronist) will be Minister of Labor.

As a consequence of Alvarez' resignation, Flamarique resigned to his position
of General Secretary of the President.

Regarding the preliminary impact of the political changes to the economic
situation it could be considered the following:

Before Alvarez resignation, the cabinet changes were considered positive
intending to increase the power of  the Minister of Economy and reduce the
internal disagreements in the Administration.
Although Alvarez (the leader of the Frepaso party) said he will be still part
of the "Alianza" (the Radical and Frepaso party alliance) in Office, Alvarez'
resignation could lead to the division of the Alianza and reduce the ability
of De la Rua to pass new laws in the Congress. A breakup of the coalition
would make the Peronist the largest party in both houses of Congress only
compounding the potential for government gridlock
This situation will weaken De la Rua and probably foster new re-alignments in
the political field.
All the situation will increase economic uncertainty and will delay economic
recovery. The market will wait to see if a conflict develops in the Alianza.
De la Rua and his team will probably be forced to take "strong" decisions to
retain the political initiative, strength and control.
Machinea will probably try to gain the market confidence, announcing that De
la Rua's Administration will not change the macro foundations of the economic
agenda and even increase its commitment toward monetary and fiscal
equilibrium, exchange rate policy, respect for vested rights, etc.

Financial analysts have viewed the situation as "an institutional crisis with
unknown effects on the economy". The insecurity of the Argentina's political
future caused Argentine debt paper to fall. The Argentine JP Morgan Emerging
Market Bond Index widened 23 basis points to 685 over US Treasuries.
Argentina's 17 year global bond fell only slightly. There does not appear to
be a market panic as noted by the trading of Argentine ADR's in New York.
They were down cents rather than dollars and a number of them closing
unchanged.

We will continue to monitor the situation and update as warranted.


Please find attached the above article from the Lloyd's List, August 31, 2001.

Kind Regards
Sarimah Black


Jim, I would start focusing some attention on gas at this point.  When we get
together I would like to sit down and go through a number of organizational
re-alignments and what we may want to do on the regulatory front to support
those businesses.

Regards
Delainey


We have received an executed financial Master Agreement:

Type of Contract:  ISDA Master Agreement (Multicurrency-Cross Border)

Effective Date:   May 15, 2001

Enron Entity:   Enron North America Corp.

Counterparty:   Sequa Corporation

Transactions Covered:  Approved for all products with the exception of:
Foreign Exchange

Confirming Entity:  Enron North America Corp.

Governing Law:   Texas

Copies will be distributed.

Stephanie Panus


Were you working on a Bill Management Agreement form that was final or near final?


523878

broker shows it for the 17th.


I will attend.

	Chaundra Woods
	11/29/2000 04:49 PM

		 To: Robert Bruce/NA/Enron@Enron, Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Angela
Davis/NA/Enron@Enron, Brent Hendry/NA/Enron@Enron, Anne C
Koehler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Francisco Pinto
Leite/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Frank
Sayre/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol
St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jordan Mintz/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Brenda Whitehead/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chaundra Woods/HOU/ECT@ECT, Becky
Spencer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carolyn George/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Legal Temp
1/HOU/ECT@ECT, Margaret Doucette/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Holly
Keiser/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kaye Ellis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Suzanne
Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Lunch Meeting on Structured Finance Transactions

SENT FOR MARY COOK:

MARK YOUR CALENDARS for a lunch meeting on Wednesday, December 6, 2000 from
11:30 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.  Danny Sullivan of Andrews & Kurth will speak on
Structured Finance Transactions:  General Structure Format and the Function
of Swaps.  A follow up e-mail will provide the conference room location.

Please RSVP no later than 12 noon on Monday, December 4, 2000 via email to
Chaundra Woods (ECT address book) so that the appropriate number of food
items can be ordered.

Thank you.

Chaundra Woods
Enron North America Corp.
713/345-7621 (office)
713/646-3490 (fax)
chaundra.woods@enron.com (email)


We are planning on bringing Flossie if that's OK.


Here is the final version.  I'll bring copies with me tomorrow to Sacramento
and can drop them off at Hedy's office.  I meet with Kari Dohn at 10 AM and
will be attending the AB 1890 Implementation Group meeting at 1:30.  I can
drop off copies before I head out for the Dohn meeting.  If there's anything
else, just let me know.  Thanks.

Best,
Jeff


Start Date: 2/5/02; HourAhead hour: 7;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002020507.txt
!!!General SQL error.
Couldn't update; currently locked by user 'admin' on machine 'ECTHOU-BPS3'.
Table

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTstNW
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 2/5/02
  TIE_POINT: MALIN_5_RNDMTN
  INTERCHG_ID: ENRJ_CISO_3000
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM


If you are unable to view this email please cut and paste the following url into your browser: http://www.dunns.com/email/demail1228.html

 [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]

  Regular NOW Entire Stock of Christmas Cards  $ 10.99-14.99 $ 5.49-7.49 Lab & Pheasant Ornaments  $ 14.99 $ 7.49 4 Peice Pewter Coffee Mug Set  $ 49.99 $ 28.99 Shotshell Shot Glasses  $ 24.99 $ 12.49 Pheasant Desk/ Mantle Clock  $ 99.99 $ 57.99 Pewter Pheasant Windchimes  $ 29.99 $ 16.99

If you received this e-mail in error or would like to make changes, click here  or go to http://www.dunns.com/email/listindex.html   to make changes or remove your subscription.


Barbara Meeks asked that I forward this information on to you.  It is the
first that I have heard about the grant.  Barbara asks that you contact her
with questions.  Also, please copy ccevents so that we can hear your
questions and keep the village informed.  I know that we will all be anxious
to hear the city's plan.  Mary G. Strickland

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <MEEKSGIRLS@aol.com>
From: MEEKSGIRLS@aol.com
Full-name: MEEKSGIRLS
Message-ID: <41.1772a3d4.29873cc4@aol.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 18:46:12 EST
Subject: League City
To: CCVEVENTS@aol.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Mailer: AOL 7.0 for Windows US sub 118

Dear Mary,
       I have some really exciting news to share with you and the residents
of Clear Creek Village, and hope you will include this in your next email.
       The City has been successful in being awarded yet ANOTHER GRANT to
purchase park land in League City.  And this purchase will positively
affect/protect your homeowners.
       Thanks to the tireless efforts, dedication and vision of Rhonda Cyrus,
Superintendent of Parks and Recreation, the City of League City has been
awarded $500,000 from the CIAP (Coastal Impact Assistance Program) to
purchase 51.4 acres from Kenneth Erickson, land that is adjacent to Clear
Creek Village.
       I know you and others will be glad that the land will not be developed
or subdivided.
       Please feel free to contact me with any questions!
Barbara Meeks


Mark,

Mika Watanabe from my group met with the consulate in Houston a while back.
The Consul general was undertaking preliminary soundings when they met with
you in Houston. Mika expressed our in principle interest in sponsoring a
Japanese cultural event in Houston. The consulate will contact us here in
Japan when a specific opportunity arises.

kind regards

Mark Schroeder@ECT
11/22/2000 11:23 PM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Nicholas O'Day/AP/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Japan consulate in Houston

Steve - where did we ever get to in terms of responding to the Consul General
about sponsorship?  I came across his name in my files, and just wanted to
make sure that we had done the courtesy of closing the loop/closing this
out.   thanks  mcs


Glad to hear things are going well.  talk to you later,.


Have you heard from Amy?

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


The Team concept has given us numerous opportunities for improvements over
the past several years with Team members continuing to be recognized and
rewarded for their positive efforts and accomplishments. As accomplishments
are made, trust and responsibilities increase, and the Team experiences
growth, maturity, and the associated rewards.

A part of this growth and maturity must include the realization and
acceptance of the Teams responsibility to monitor and enforce Company
policies and procedures. As you heard from me in 2000, I will protect those
who are complying with and enforcing our requirements, but I have zero
tolerance for those who choose not to do so. Along with the rewards for
positive efforts, there are also consequences for those who fail to act when
circumstances call for action.

During the year 2000, several ETS employees received disciplinary action as a
result of their failure to act and/or ignoring safe work practices. These
cases were distributed to all employees in the form of a Safety Bulletin. It
has been my intention that we all learn from these instances to make our work
place even safer.

As we publish this first, and hopefully only, Safety Bulletin in 2001, I
would like to share with you two instances from last year.

After repeatedly counseling a fellow team member observed violating several
safety requirements (including hard hat, safety glasses, FRC), one Team took
action, which ultimately resulted in this person being discharged. While this
may seem to be a harsh outcome, it is much better than the person injuring
themselves, or even worse, a fellow team member. This person had others
expressing concern over his well-being and chose to ignore the warnings.
Individual team members acted on their responsibility and the team as a whole
accepted their accountability.

In the second case, a team member chose to drive a Company vehicle without
using a seatbelt. The employee was involved in an accident ejecting him from
the vehicle, causing injuries that could have been prevented if the seat belt
would have been properly used. This employee is lucky to be alive. Use of
seat belts by all occupants of Company vehicles is one of the most basic
elements of our program and has been a requirement for over 20 years. As the
use of seat belts is habit forming, could this have been the first time the
employee failed to use them? Is it possible that other Team members had
observed this failure in the past and not acted? Could this have been
prevented through positive interaction? Had positive interaction been taken
but ignored?

When the Declaration of Interdependence was introduced in 1998, we made the
commitment to each other that we would be our Brothers and Sisters Keeper and
to remind each other of the need to comply with safety requirements at all
times. While some employees may feel uncomfortable enforcing our
requirements, that does not relieve the person from their responsibility.
Likewise, a Team is responsible and accountable for the actions (or lack of a
required action) of each Team member. Each individual team member and the
team as a whole are responsible for the outcome and any disciplinary action
that management may be required to take.

Please assist us in creating the safest work environment possible.  Our most
important personal goal should be to do whatever it takes to arrive home
safely each and every night, and should expect nothing less from peers or
members of your leadership to hold you accountable for doing just that.


A regulah laugh riot, that's what she is.

Prentice, you're the best birthday present I could ever have--even better than money.  xoxoxox

-----Original Message-----
From: Prentice Sellers [mailto:psellers@pacbell.net]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 5:26 PM
To: Scott Laughlin; Dasovich, Jeff; cameron@perfect.com;
eldon@direcpc.com; jdasovic@enron.com; Nancy.Sellers@RobertMondavi.com;
psellers@pacbell.net
Subject: Re: RE: pp pays!

That's what his next birthday present is going to be.

>---- Original Message ---
>From: Scott Laughlin <scottwl@hotmail.com>
>To: Jeff.Dasovich@ENRON.com, cameron@perfect.com, eldon@direcpc.com,   jdasovic@enron.com, Nancy.Sellers@RobertMondavi.com, psellers@pacbell.net
>Cc:
>Subject: RE: pp pays!
>
>If your birthday present was ten bucks, maybe you would have gotten
>repaid...
>
>
>>From: "Dasovich, Jeff" <Jeff.Dasovich@ENRON.com>
>>To: "Scott Laughlin" <scottwl@hotmail.com>, <cameron@perfect.com>,
>><eldon@direcpc.com>, <jdasovic@enron.com>,
>><Nancy.Sellers@RobertMondavi.com>, <psellers@pacbell.net>
>>Subject: RE: pp pays!
>>Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 20:59:26 -0600
>>
>>for the record, scott got his ten bucks before I got repaid for the
>>birthday present that I bought for myself.
>>
>>some things never change...
>>
>>	-----Original Message-----
>>	From: Scott Laughlin
>>	Sent: Thu 11/29/2001 7:43 PM
>>	To: cameron@perfect.com; eldon@direcpc.com; jdasovic@enron.com;
>>Nancy.Sellers@RobertMondavi.com; psellers@pacbell.net
>>	Cc:
>>	Subject: pp pays!
>>
>>
>>
>>	I just want all of you to know that I came home last night, and
>>there was a
>>	six-pack of Sierra Nevada on my bed! As I looked closer I
>>realized that
>>	there was a ten-dollar bill wrapped around one of the bottles.
>>Then, I
>>	realized that t


All stakeholders are reminded to register early for the NARUC-DOE North
American Summit on Harmonizing Business Practices in Energy Restructuring to
be held in Dallas, Texas, from November 29th to December 1st, 2000.  Early
registration entitles you to a significant discount off the registration fee
and reserves your place at this important event.  Early registration closes
on October 27th, 2000.

The Summit will be the only event this year co-hosted by the National
Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC) and the U.S.
Department of Energy.  The Summit is intended to address the most pressing
issues facing the North American energy industry as we move towards a more
competitive, transnational marketplace.    A blue-ribbon group of energy
experts and leaders are committed to attend and discuss the issues with the
stakeholders.

Your participation and input are critical to the success of this effort.
However, time is short and the Summit is filling up fast.  Please plan to
join the leading regulatory and government officials, consumer advocates and
industry leaders by registering today.

To register early, you simply need to go to
www.energymarkets.org/registration.htm  For more information, please feel
free to contact Ken Malloy, President of the Center for the Advancement of
Energy Markets (CAEM), by responding to this e-mail or call the Summit
hotline at (703) 234-3375.  Be sure to sign up for program and speaker
updates via e-mail at www.energymarkets.org.

Please forward this email to colleagues who you think might be interested in
the Summit.

We are looking forward to seeing you in Dallas in November.

Sincerely,

Ken Malloy
President
Center for the Advancement of Energy Markets


The homework assignment of the fourth grade
was to have each child get their parents to tell
them a story with a moral at the end of it.

The next day the kids came back and one by
one began to tell their stories.

Kathy said, "My father's a farmer and we have
a lot of egg-laying hens. One time we were
taking our eggs to market in a basket on the
front seat of the pickup when we hit a bump in
the road and all the eggs went flying and broke
and made a mess."

"And what's the moral of the story?"
Asked the teacher.

"Don't put all your eggs in one basket!"

"Very good," said the teacher. "Now, Lucy?"

"Our family are farmers too. But we raise
chickens for the meat market. We had a
dozen eggs one time, but when they hatched
we only got ten live chicks. And the moral
to this story is, don't count your chickens
until they're hatched."

"That was a fine story, Lucy. Johnny, do
you have a story to share?"

"Yes, ma'am, my daddy told me this story
about my Aunt Karen. Aunt Karen was a
flight engineer in Desert Storm and her plane
got hit. She had to bail out over enemy
territory and all she had was a bottle of
whiskey, a machine gun and a machete. She
drank the whiskey on the way down so it
wouldn't break and then she landed right in
the middle of 100 enemy troops. She killed
seventy of them with the machine gun until
she ran out of bullets, then she killed twenty
more with the machete till the blade broke
and then she killed the last ten with her
bare hands."

"Good heavens," said the horrified teacher,
"what kind of moral did your daddy tell you
from that horrible story?"

"Don't fuck with Aunt Karen when
she's been drinking."


<<Excambria Non-Disclosure Agreement>> Your message

  To:      john.dean@excambria.com
  Cc:      Louise.Kitchen@enron.com; Rahil.Jafry@enron.com
  Subject: Excambria Non-Disclosure Agreement
  Sent:    Wed, 13 Dec 2000 15:13:42 -0800

was delivered to the following recipient(s):

Dean, John on Wed, 13 Dec 2000 15:14:28 -0800

Message-ID: <OF67152027.9D7676EB-ON862569B4.005E294C@enron.com>
From: Tana.Jones@enron.com
To: john.dean@excambria.com
Cc: Louise.Kitchen@enron.com, Rahil.Jafry@enron.com
Subject: Excambria Non-Disclosure Agreement
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 15:13:42 -0800
Return-Receipt-To: Tana.Jones@enron.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0)
X-MS-Embedded-Report:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"


What is your location and I'll have a "sample" sent to you.

Marie

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bell, Rebecca
Sent:	Monday, September 17, 2001 3:58 PM
To:	Panus, Stephanie; Heard, Marie; Boyd, Samantha; Bailey, Susan
Cc:	Dawson, Wendy
Subject:	ISDA Master Agreement

Hey gang,

Would it be possible to obtain a blank ISDA Master Agreement?  I have just worked up a draft ISDA Swap for Gray Communications, and I have been informed that they would also like to see a copy of a sample ISDA Master Agreement as well.

Your help is much appreciated.

Thank you,
Becca
Rebecca Bell


Sheila--As we discussed, I am attaching revised versions of the ABB and GE
override letters, clarifying that they dissolve only on assignment to a
nonaffiliated party.


Pam,

Thanks. The list of E-mail addresses would be useful as well.

Vince

Pamela Vande Krol Castro <castro@rice.edu> on 01/17/2001 03:05:01 PM
To: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
cc:
Subject: MGMT 656 (Rice University)

Here are your rosters for MGMT 656. Let me know if you need a list of
e-mail addresses as well. I will update you as student schedules change.
- Pam
(713-348-6223)
 - 656.doc


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 05/23/2000 10:27
AM ---------------------------

	From:  Colleen Sullivan                           05/23/2000 09:05 AM

To: Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip K
Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Theresa Branney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Maria Garza/HOU/ECT@ECT, Judy
Townsend/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan Junek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dick
Jenkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas Engel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Mills/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jane
M Tholt/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: EOL Follow up Meeting

Please plan to attend a follow up meeting to discuss what is needed as far as
position screens for trading transportation capacity on EOL.  The meeting
will be at 11:30 -12:30 today, May 23, 2000, in Room 3321.

There is a NYMEX screen in this conference room, and lunch will be provided.


Notice No. 02-70
March 11, 2002

TO:		All NYMEX Division Members/Member Firms
		All NYMEX Division Clearing Members
		All NYMEX Division Floor Traders
		All NYMEX Division Operations Managers

FROM:	George Henderson, Vice President

RE:		Options Expiration Operational Procedures for the
Trading Floor and Clearing Members - Revised Hours

The expiration date for the April 2002 options contract for Crude Oil (LOJ2)
is Friday, March 15, 2002.

GENERAL OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES

All Clearing Members and Qualified Floor Traders that carried an options
position as of the close of business day prior to the expiration day, or
engaged in trading activity on Expiration Day in the expiring options
contract will be required to have a knowledgeable, duly authorized
representative present at their normal work station promptly at 4:40 p.m.
until released by the Exchange staff as specified below.  All adjustments
and/or corrections, must be accompanied by relevant supporting documentation
prior to being incorporated into expiration processing, in essence making
the expiration processing an extension of the afternoon trade resolution
procedures.  All input to the NYMEX Clearing Department will conclude no
later than 30 minutes after floor representatives are released.

Exchange Clearing (299-2110), Floor Trade Processing (299-2068 and 299-2169)
personnel, as well as a representative of the Floor Committee will be
available to assist with the processing of notices of Exercise and
Abandonment, position transfers, trade corrections and other questions or
problems you may have.

CLEARING DEPARTMENT OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES

The Option Expiration process is a screen based process for which all
information is provided on the screens on C21 terminals. No Option
Expiration Reports will be provided. The following screens will assist you
through the Option Expiration process:

MEMBER TRADE INQUIRY
Contains real-time top day trade information, trade information for the
previous 4 business days and trades adjusted for the previous 4 business
days by adjustment date.

SINGLE POSITION MAINTENANCE
Contains a real-time snapshot for each option series from the start of day
position to the projected end of day position.

REVIEW ACCEPT REJECT TRANSFERS
Contains all trade and position transfers TO your firm and the status of
each transfer.

REVIEW SUBMITTED TRANSFERS
Contains all trade and position transfer FROM your firm and the status of
each transfer.

EXERCISE NOTICE SUBMISSION
Contains your available long position and an input field to enter the number
of long positions you wish to exercise.

DO NOT EXERCISE SUBMISSION
Contains your available long position and an input field to enter the number
of long positions you wish to abandon.

POSITION CHANGE SUBMISSION
PCS may be submitted either by manual input or by electronic transmission.
Any PCS input on a Clearing 21 terminal will be the input processed by the
system.  This input may be made at any time prior to 6:45 p.m.  Any PCS
input via transmission for that contract series will be disregarded.

ALL POSITIONS ARE DEEMED FINAL
Upon completion of all PCS input, all positions will be deemed final.

EXERCISE/ASSIGNMENT INFORMATION
Will be available to you on the Single Position Maintenance window by
contract series or the Assignment List window which contains all your
Assignments on one window. You will be notified of its availability by C21
E-Mail and by Fast Facts. This should occur within 1 hour of the last PCS
input.

All Clearing Members are required to have an authorized representative(s) at
their C21 workstations in preparation for any communication during the
expiration process.

FAST FACTS
Clearing Members should call the Fast Facts information service 301-4871,
access code 700 for event messages advising Members of the event status.

E-MAIL
Clearing Members should read their C21 E-Mail messages immediately to be
aware of event status.

The standard event Fast Facts and/or E-Mail messages and the sequence in
which they will be announced are:

STANDARD EVENT			APPROXIMATE TIME		  USUAL	FAST
FACTS(F)
  MESSAGES				   OF MESSAGE		EVENT TIME
E-MAIL    (E)
					  AVAILABILITY
BOTH      (B)

Announce Out-of-the    			 4:45PM		 4:45PM		F
Money Exercise and In-the-Money
Do Not Exercise Submissions

Announce Final Input to C21		 6:30PM		 6:45PM		E
Cutoff Time

All positions are deemed final	 7:00PM		 7:00PM		F

Announce Exercise/Assignment		 7:30PM		 7:30PM		B
Information Available on the Single
Position Maintenance Windows

All Report Distribution is		10:00PM		10:00PM		F
completed

The times appearing in the Usual Event Time column are based on normal
operational conditions and could vary.

If you have any questions concerning these procedures, please contact
Anthony Di Benedetto at 299-2152 or John Ramos at 299-2142 prior to the
expiration date.

 <<EXPFORMSPEC.XLS>>

 - EXPFORMSPEC.XLS


I think you have a conflict for that one, but I understand you are available
for the March 14-5 one!  DF

	From:  Susan Scott                           01/04/2000 11:12 AM

To: Drew Fossum@ENRON
cc:

Subject: More on El Paso Protest of ENA Purchased Capacity

P.S. If it's OK with you I will plan to attend the Energy Seminar on Feb.
10-11 (see 2d half of Lorna's e-mail)
---------------------- Forwarded by Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron on 01/04/2000
11:12 AM ---------------------------

Lorna Brennan
01/04/2000 10:25 AM
To: Margaret Carson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rita Hartfield/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rockey
Storie/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Stephanie Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kent
Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, John Dushinske/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dave
Neubauer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mike McGowan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven
Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lindy Donoho/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jeffery
Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lorraine Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin
Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Christine Stokes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lee
Huber/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: More on El Paso Protest of ENA Purchased Capacity

Marathon and Phillips Join Protest

    Two more shippers have joined Amoco and Burlington Resources in their
joint protest against El Paso?s decision to sell to Enron 1.2 Bcf of excess
capacity from the San Juan Basin to California. Marathon and Phillips have
joined in the protest, attacking the entire deal as anti-competitive. The
protesters hope FERC will force El Paso to begin again with capacity
assignments. Amoco and Burlington had already protested the deal two weeks
ago at FERC, when they claimed the sale would violate El Paso?s rate case
settlement and tariff. The shippers argue that El Paso was trying to sell
part of that primary firm capacity at delivery points other than
PG&E/Topock), which the settlement prohibits. The settlement was intended to
protect PG&E and allow it to access service. If this capacity is delivered at
other points such as SoCal/Topock, it could add to the glut at that point,
the protesters argued. El Paso and Enron stand to gain if the basis
differential between the San Juan Basin and California remains large.
Marathon and Phillips say that Enron and El Paso can manipulate that basis
differential because between them and their affiliates they control all the
excess capacity from the San Juan Basin to California.
______________________________________________________________________
Energy Seminars
New 2000 Dates!

San Francisco
February 10-11

Miami Beach
February 29-March 1

Houston
 March 14-15
Stay after for the Houston Energy Expo!

Denver
April 12-13
Come early for GasMart/Power 2000!

Houston
 May 9-10

Other seminars include:
 *  Gas Contracts from A to Z: Level 100 & 202
 *  Natural Gas
 *  Electricity 101
 *  Retail Energy Marketing 101
 *  Gas Processing Contracts & Negotiations
 *  Basis Trading & Hedging in Electric Power
 *  Basis Trading & Hedging with Natural Gas
 *  Petroleum Products Hedging & Risk Management
 *  And more

Seminars are available for in-house sessions also!

For More Information:
Visit at http://www.energyseminars.co
m
Call 281.362.7979
email:registrar@energyseminars.com
______________________________________________________________________

Speculators Reduce Long Ratio

    Speculators have reduced the size of their bets on rising NYMEX crude oil
futures during the two weeks ending last year. Speculator long positions now
outnumber short positions by 1.4 to 1 compared with a ratio of 2.9 to 1 two
weeks earlier and 3.8 to 1 four weeks earlier. Prices peaked at a
post-Gulf-War high of $27.15 a barrel November 22nd and ended the year at
$25.60. Long positions in crude oil futures on the NYMEX held by hedge funds
and large speculators were 44,233 on December 28th, little changed from
44,693 on December 14th, according to the CFTC. Speculator short positions
doubled, though, to 31,868 from 15,364. Speculators also became less bullish
about both gasoline and heating oil as their short positions increased much
more than the long positions did during the two-week period. The ratio of
longs to shorts in gasoline fell to about 3-to-2 from 20-to-1. For natural
gas, speculators increased their overall bet that gas prices would fall. They
had placed bets for rising gas prices from April until mid-November, when a
lack of severe cold weather demand pulled prices down from a two-year high.
The following table shows the changes in speculator positions for crude oil,
heating oil, gasoline and natural gas futures.

Contract    Date    Long            Short       L - S
Crude       12/28   44,233          31,868      12,365
Crude       12/14   44,693          15,364      29,329
HO          12/28   13,632          11,146       2,486
HO          12/14   9,717           4,372        5,345
Gasoline    12/28   13,115      7,950        5,165
Gasoline    12/14   11,908        585           11,323
NG          12/28   14,879        24,355        (9,476)
NG          12/14   12,779        19,925       (7,146)
_____________________________________________________________

FOR TIMELY INSIGHTS INTO NORTH AMERICAN GAS MARKET ISSUES

From One of North America?s Leading Energy Consultants

What We Offer:

Comprehensive advice on critical North American gas industry issues and
developments unbiased opinions on complex natural gas industry issues,
informed by an understanding of your business challenges early reporting on
important trends, strong competitive intelligence clearly written, focused
research.

Ziff Energy?s North American Gas Strategies Retainer Service - Join other
producers, pipelines, marketers, LDCs, and end-users from Canada and the U.S.
 who are our retainer clients.

As a Retainer Client You Receive:

Bi-annual executive briefings customized to focus on your issues insightful
and high quality research reports - at least one report per month access to
senior consultants.

Custom Consulting:

Our experienced staff in Calgary and Houston understand the current strategic
issues that are affecting the North American gas industry today.  Our
strategic gas consulting features strong objective analysis, and our
significant industry experience.  Ziff Energy performs consulting work in a
variety of areas including markets, transportation, supply, storage and
mid-stream.  We have the experience and the capability to integrate these
areas to address your needs.

In business since 1982, Ziff Energy has grown to become one of North
America?s leading energy consultants.  With our large U.S. producer and
pipeline client base, Ziff Energy offers strong supply intelligence on the
U.S. Gulf of Mexico and onshore U.S. gas basins.  With 50+ staff in our
Calgary and Houston offices, we are available to meet your strategic
information needs.

For more information about Ziff Energy?s Retainer Service
and consulting areas where we can be of assistance, contact Jim Oosterbaan,
V.P. Gas Services at (403) 234-4279 or joosterbaan@ziffenergy.com.
www.ziffenergy.com/nagsconference
______________________________________________________________________

Statoil Sells E&P Business to Equitable

    Equitable Resources, has acquired Statoil Energy?s Appalachian Basin Gas
Exploration and Production subsidiaries, Eastern States Exploration Company
and Eastern States Oil and Gas for $630 million. The transaction is expected
to close in February. The sale includes natural gas reserves totaling
approximately 1.1 Tcf, 6,500 production wells, and 4,000 miles of pipeline
network in Kentucky, West Virginia, Pennsylvania and Ohio. Sale of the
exploration and production business is the first step in The Statoil Group?s
overall plan of complete divestment of Statoil Energy. Statoil Energy?s
remaining businesses, power generation, energy marketing and trading,  will
be offered for sale in a separate process starting later this month. The
divestment plan is part of Statoil?s overall restructuring program to
concentrate on its core business activities: exploration and production in
Norway and other selected areas of the world; the European natural gas and
energy business; crude oil trading, refining and marketing; and
petrochemicals. Equitable?s market capitalization is $1.1 billion.
______________________________________________________________________

TAGE
The Austin Group Energy
Executive Search Consultants

pj@austingrp.com -  www.austingrp.com
Phone (281) 497-8595  -   Fax (281) 597-0099
______________________________________________________________________

EPRI Launches Customized Technical Support Services Subsidiary

   A new subsidiary of the Electric Power Research Institute will offer
customized technical support services to both members and non-members of its
research program. EPRIsolutions is a for-profit subsidiary created to hasten
the application of EPRI technologies already developed through decades of
collaborative research. EPRIsolutions will work directly with our customers
to select, install and support the EPRI technologies most suitable for their
particular needs. Many of the services offered will be performed by the staff
of EPRI?s Technology Application Centers located throughout the US. For
example, the Engineering and Test Centers in Lenox, Mass. and Haslet, Tex.
can provide audits of utility power delivery systems to identify weaknesses
before they lead to outages. The Maintenance and Diagnostics Center in
Charlotte, N.C. can help customers save on the cost of operating and
maintaining their fossil-fired power plants. As an example of how such
integrated services will be offered, EPRIsolutions can help customers adapt
and install the powerful, sophisticated software packages now available for
load forecasting, environmental risk assessment, and retail market
management. In some cases, EPRIsolutions will go one step further by acting
as an application service provider for companies that want to outsource
data-intensive operations. The first such ASP activity will be on-line
monitoring and diagnosis of water chemistry for several nuclear power plants.
EPRIsolutions is being formed through the merger of two existing
subsidiaries, EPRICSG and EPRIGEN, which were created to allow EPRI to
conduct proprietary R&D on behalf of individual funders, who would retain
rights to the intellectual property involved. In addition to continuing this
activity, EPRIsolutions takes on the function of providing customized
technology application and consulting services. Such private-benefit work
lies beyond the scope of EPRI's tax-exempt, collaborative research mission
and thus requires the use of a taxable subsidiary.
______________________________________________________________________

HEAD?S UP? PRICES DOWN!

    Natural gas prices have fallen to $2.40/MMBtu from $3.20/MMBtu just last
month. Storage injections still outweigh storage withdrawals. Where will
prices go? Depends on the weather. If it is warm in Houston and New York City
over the Thanksgiving holidays, will prices continue to head south? Under
those conditions, they have since 1993. Call it ?Rader?s Stupid Frozen Turkey
Theory? or call it storage fundamentals, but be prepared in case this silly
theory comes true one more year. For an in-depth, wellhead to burnertip study
of the natural gas industry, following is the winter schedule for the
original Natural Gas 101? training courses. Or call to set up an in-house
course at your convenience.

NATURAL GAS 1010 Schedule
                            2nd Week Jan - Houston, TX
                            Early Feb -         Call for Exact dates
                            Early Mar -         Houston, TX
                            April 19 -          New Orleans, LA
                                            Speaking at EEI National Accounts

    Natural Gas 101 is a registered trademark of Rader Energy Consultants.
Contact: Linda K. Rader, Rader Energy Consultants
P.O. Box 27391, Houston, TX 77227-7391
(713) 621-0808 or (713) 993-9325, ext. 161
natgas101@att.net
______________________________________________________________________

Oxy and EOG Swap Properties

    Occidental Petroleum and EOG Resources have exchanged oil and natural gas
fields to cut costs and boost production. Oxy received fields in California
that produce about 12 MMcf per day and mineral rights to more than 700,000
acres of land in the state. It also received properties in the western Gulf
that produce 26 MMcfe per day, adjacent to fields Oxy already owns. EOG
received properties in eastern Texas that are next to fields it owns and
which produce 33 MMcf per day and 3,000 barrels of oil a day. It also
acquired exploration rights on 312,000 acres in the Oklahoma panhandle.
_____________________________________________________________________

     Houston Energy Expo              GasMart/Power2000

Are you planning to attend the Houston Energy Expo or GasMart/Power2000?
Today?s hot issues: Deregulation, Gridlock, Gas Supply & Power Demand,
Merchant Plants, Fossil Fuels, Mergers and Aquisitions.  Are you reacting to
the changes throughout your industry?  Or, are you acting strategically &
decisively through integration of goals and objectives?  We offer innovative
experiences, transformations and integrated marketing solutions for your next
tradeshow.
For a free "Tradeshow Timeline & Exhibit Staffing Strategy Guide"
call, fax or e-mail us today.
Attn: Brent P. Sells
Mail to: bsells@o-group.com
  Phone: 800-725-8347 Ext. 121
Fax: 713-462-8347
25 years Domestically and Internationally
For more information regarding the Houston Energy Expo,
please visit the NESA website at www.nesanet.
org
For more information about attending, exhibiting, advertising, or sponsorship
at GasMart/Power2000, please visit our website at www.gasmart.com
______________________________________________________________________

Calpine Buys Reserves from Vintage

     Calpine has acquired 90 Bcf of natural gas reserves from Vintage
Petroleum for $71.5 million, becoming the largest gas producer in
California?s Sacramento Valley. Calpine bought the remaining 58% interest in
the Rio Vista field that it did not already own, along with some exploration
rights. It received the 42%  stake when it acquired Sheridan Energy last
November for $128 million. Calpine plans to purchasing natural gas fields and
pipelines so it can provide fuel for its natural gas powered generators at
lower costs. Calpine plans to expand its electric generation businesses in
California, Texas, Arizona and Nevada along with the Southeast and Northeast.
It operates power plants that can generate 3,400 MW.
.

Callon Natural Gas Blowout

    Callon Petroleum had a natural gas blowout while drilling a test well in
the Gulf of Mexico and a fire is burning from a portion of the well. There
were no injuries at the  at South Marsh Island Block 261 well, about 60 miles
south of Lafayette, Louisiana. The fire is burning from a portion of the well
casing about 20 feet above sea level. Wild Well Control, a well-blowout
specialty company, is making preparations to bring the well under control.

Please Welcome Our Advertisers by Visiting These Websites!
www.nesanet.org
www.gasmart.com
www.austingrp.com
www.energy.com/ebid
www.ziffenergy.com/nagsconference

Financial Summary
The TSE 300 rose 7.68 points to 8413.75
The CRB Index is 204.27
The US Dollar retreated 1.65 points to 100..29
The Dow lost 140.23 points to 11356.89
The S&P 500 decreased 14.08 points to 1455.17
The Nasdaq was up 61.40 points to 4130.71
February NYMEX Crude Oil is 25.60
Canadian-U.S. Exchange fell .0074 to 1.4433

    Enerfax Daily is the North America's gas and power information source. It
is sent to you free of charge. Enerfax Daily may be copied and redistributed
in its entirety to all interested energy professionals. Please call
281/583-7937,  or e-mail us at enerfax1@aol.com with the e-mail addresses of
other energy professionals that would like to be added to Enerfax Daily's
growing distribution list of thousands of energy professionals in the U.S.
and Canada, or to be removed.  The information contained herein was obtained
from sources which Enerfax Daily believes to be reliable, but does not
guarantee its accuracy.
     Your support of our advertisers is greatly appreciated and will keep
Enerfax Daily free. Thank you. Your comments are welcome.