I spoke to Jay Hopper again at KN.  Here are the results of my conversation:

1.  Entergy Project--I told Jay that our immediate interest would be to
purchase the Jackson project with the outside tolling bid in place.  Given
their immediate focus is to finalize the tolling agreement for the project,
he suggested that we revisit this topic in 3 months.  He sounded a bit
nervous.  Perhaps there is an opportunity to swoop in later.

2.  ECAR Projects--Because these projects are 4th and 5th in their cue, he
would like to discuss our involvement at a later date.

3.  7FA versus 7EA turbines--It turbines out that KN's Illinois turbines are
7EAs (six of them).  I told him that we would still be interested in making a
joint venture proposal for the turbines to them.  He is going to have Chuck
Walker from his Chicago office call me.


How true - isn't it amazing and wonderful to see prayers in public -
Congress on the Capitol steps.  It would be interesting to know when this
original prayer was given - I can not imagine people walking out of prayers
at this point in time...

Regards,
Amy Brock
HBD Marketing Team
Office: 281-988-2157
Cell:  713-702-6815

-----Original Message-----
From:	Suzanne Young [SMTP:syoung_piedmont@yahoo.com]
<mailto:[SMTP:syoung_piedmont@yahoo.com]>
Sent:	Monday, September 17,2001 8:50 PM
To:	Andrea; janet bilyeu; amy brock; heather cottom; crites; christi
degeare; Beverly Edwards; Misty Floyd; Leah Haynes; Michele Huneke; john;
Leslie; Vicki Moyer; Kim Pope; Kerri Williams
Subject:	Fwd: [Fwd: ]

Note: forwarded message attached.

__________________________________________________
Terrorist Attacks on U.S. - How can you help?
Donate cash, emergency relief information
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/fc/US/Emergency_Information/ <<Fwd: [Fwd: ]>>

==================================================================?EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84vNF.a9iVHm?Or send an email To: brcc.yf-unsubscribe@topica.com?This email was sent to: dfarmer@enron.com??T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!?http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register?==================================================================

Message-ID: <20010917131251.60552.qmail@web14603.mail.yahoo.com>
From: Michele Huneke <michele_huneke@yahoo.com>
To: Diane Gouveia <diane.gouveia@nmfn.com>, Sean Kelly Smith	 <seankelsm@att.net>, Pam Wiidanen <wiidanen@uswest.net>, Suzanne Young	 <syoung_piedmont@yahoo.com>
Subject: Fwd: [Fwd: ]
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 08:12:51 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain

Subject: Amen

A little something to make us think about the impact
we might make on our world if only we would be willing
to try!

OPENING PRAYER -- KANSAS STATE SENATE
Thought you might enjoy this interesting prayer given
in KANSAS at the opening session of their Senate. It
seems prayer still upsets some people.

When Minister Joe Wright was asked to open the new
session of the KANSAS SENATE, everyone was expecting
the usual generalities, but this is what they heard:

Subject: Amen

A little something to make us think about the impact
we might make on our world if only we would be willing
to try!

OPENING PRAYER -- KANSAS STATE SENATE
Thought you might enjoy this interesting prayer given
in KANSAS at the opening session of their Senate. It
seems prayer still upsets some people.

When Minister Joe Wright was asked to open the new
session of the KANSAS SENATE, everyone was expecting
the usual generalities, but this is what they heard:

" Heavenly Father, we come before you today to ask
your forgiveness and to seek your direction and
guidance.

We know Your Word says, "Woe to those who call evil
good", but that is exactly what we have done.

We have lost our spiritual equilibrium and reversed
our values.  We confess that.

We have ridiculed the absolute truth of Your Word and
called it Pluralism.

We have exploited the poor and called it the lottery,

We have rewarded laziness and called it welfare,

We have killed our unborn and called it choice,

We have shot abortionists and called it justifiable,

We have neglected to discipline our children and
called it building self-esteem,

We have abused power and called it politics,

We have coveted our neighbor's possessions and called
it ambition,

We have polluted the air with profanity and
pornography and called it freedom of statement,

We have ridiculed the time-honored values of our
forefathers and called it enlightenment.

Search us, Oh, God, and know our hearts today; cleanse
us from every sin and set us free.  Guide and bless
these men and women who have been sent to direct us to
the center of Your will and to openly ask these things
in the name of Your Son, the living Savior, Jesus
Christ.  " Amen.!! "

The response was immediate. A number of legislators
walked out during the prayer in protest.  In 6 short
weeks, Central Christian Church, where Rev. Wright is
pastor, logged more than 5,000 phone calls with only
47 of those calls responding negatively.  The church
is now receiving international requests for copies of
this prayer from India, Africa, and Korea.
Commentator Paul Harvey aired this prayer on his radio
program, " The Rest of the Story ", and received a
larger response to this program than any other he has
ever aired. With the Lord's help, may this prayer
sweep over our nation and wholeheartedly become our
desire so that we again can be called, " one nation
under God. " If possible, please pass this prayer on
to your friends.  Think about this: If you forward
this prayer to everyone on your email list in less
than 30 days it would be heard by the world.

__________________________________________________
Terrorist Attacks on U.S. - How can you help?
Donate cash, emergency relief information
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/fc/US/Emergency_Information/


Hi Jeff-

I will be around the week of August 1st.  When you know what your schedule is going to be like, let me know and we will make plans.

Where did you live in NYC?  Are you from NY originally?


Thursday is great.
PL


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
NATIONAL JOURNAL'S TECHNOLOGY DAILY
DAILY FEATURE
is now available on nationaljournal.com:
Click Here: http://nationaljournal.com/pubs/techdaily/
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

TECH DAILY AFTERNOON FEATURE:
State Roundup: Staff Writer Liza Porteus looks at how state law enforcers
are taking issue with a federal proposal to preempt any state laws on Web
privacy
Click here to go directly to the feature -
http://nationaljournal.com/pubs/techdaily/features/states/stat011018.htm

TODAY ON NATIONALJOURNAL.COM:
-- WELL-READ WONK: A Third World Look At America
   http://nationaljournal.com/members/reviews/

-- CAPITOL CORRIDORS: The Great American Pork Hunt
   http://nationaljournal.com/members/buzz/capitolcorridors.htm

----------------------------
To stop receiving these E-mail Alerts:

Reply to this message and include the word "unsubscribe" (without quotes)
in the BODY of the message.
----------------------------
National Journal's Technology Daily is published daily by National Journal
Group Inc. For more information about National Journal Group's
publications, go to http://www.nationaljournal.com.


Please find attached the minutes from the April 3, 2001, PRC Committee Meeting:

If you have any question, please feel free to call Gina @ 5-3377 or Jackie @ 5-3563

Regards,

Dave


I've changed all the deals I could find that contained the counterparty name
"California Department of Water Resources - CDWR" to "California Energy
Resource Schedulers - State of California." The following deal numbers are
those that have been changed. If you come across other daily deals, most
likely done by EPMI Short Term California or Short Term Northwest, let me
know and I'll change those counterparty names too.

510867/860/857/853/775/774

509540/518/513/511/509/508/504/463/462

Thanks for your help on this.

Kate


lets discuss


thank you and happy new year!

liane_kucher@mcgraw-hill.com on 12/29/2000 01:44:23 PM
To: scott.neal@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Thank you

Scott,
We now have nearly all of Enron's complete bidweek information, including
those
in the Mid-Continent region. Thank you for your help and I hope you have a
great
holiday weekend.
Liane


On Friday, we informed you about the IRS announcement that it will resume
issuing private letter rulings on whether synthetic fuels produced from coal
qualify for a tax credit under tax code Section 29.  Following is additional
information from BNA.
Section 29 provides a credit for the production and sale of "qualified fuels"
produced from a nonconventional source, IRS said, including liquid, gaseous,
or solid synthetic fuels produced from coal or lignite. In Rev. Proc. 2000-47
(209 DTR G-1, L-1, 10/27/00), IRS stopped issuing rulings under Section 29
because it said it was concerned that taxpayers claiming the credit were not
processing the coal in the manner intended by Congress.
IRS asked for information on the processes used to produce solid fuel for
which taxpayers claimed the credit. It received numerous comment letters,
many urging it to resume issuing rulings, others agreeing that some processes
should not qualify for the credit.  In Rev. Proc. 2001-30, IRS said it will
issue a ruling on processes it had approved prior to 2000. The production
process must meet the following requirements, IRS said:

substantially all of the coal used as feedstock must undergo a significant
chemical change;
the feedstock coal must consist entirely of coal fines or crushed coal
comprised of particles no larger than 1/8 inch;
the feedstock coal must be thoroughly mixed: (a) with styrene or other
monomers following an acid bath, (b) with quinoline or other organic resin
and left to cure for several days, (c) with ultra heavy hydrocarbons, or (d)
with an aluminum and/or magnesium silicate binder after being heated to a
minimum temperature of 500 degrees Fahrenheit; and
the treatment method must involve elevated temperature and pressure that
results in briquettes, pellets, or an extruded fuel product or the taxpayer
may represent that the omission of these procedures will not significantly
increase the production output of the facility.

The revenue procedure applies to both pending and future ruling requests.
Rev. Proc. 2001-30 will be published in Internal Revenue Bulletin 2001-19,
dated May 7.  See text below.
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________

No. 78
Monday April 23, 2001	Page L-1
	ISSN 1523-567X
	Tax, Budget & Accounting Text

	EnergyIRS Revenue Procedure 2001-30 Announcing Decision to Issue Letter
Rulings
On Whether Solid Fuel Produced From Coal Qualifies Under I.R.C. Section 29

Rev. Proc. 2001-30 is scheduled to appear in Internal Revenue Bulletin
2001-19, dated May 7, 2001.

Part III
Administrative, Procedural, and Miscellaneous
26 CFR 601.201: Rulings and determination letters.
(Also Part I, o29.)
Rev. Proc. 2001-30

SECTION 1. PURPOSE
This revenue procedure informs the public of the Internal Revenue Service's
decision to issue private letter rulings regarding whether a solid fuel
produced from coal is a qualified fuel under o29(c)(1)(C) of the Internal
Revenue Code under the circumstances described in section 3 of this revenue
procedure.
SECTION 2. BACKGROUND
Section 2.01 of Rev. Proc. 2001-3, 2001-1 I.R.B. 111, provides that whenever
appropriate in the interest of sound tax administration, it is the policy of
the Service to answer inquiries of individuals and organizations regarding
their status for tax purposes and the tax effects of their acts or
transactions, prior to the filing of returns or reports that are required by
the revenue laws. There are, however, certain areas in which, because of the
inherently factual nature of the problems involved, or for other reasons, the
Service will not issue rulings or determinations letters.
Section 4 of Rev. Proc. 2001-3 sets forth those areas in which rulings or
determination letters will not ordinarily be issued. "Not ordinarily" means
that unique and compelling reasons must be demonstrated to justify the
issuance of a ruling or determination letter. Section 2.01 of Rev. Proc.
2001-3.
Section 4.02(1) of Rev. Proc. 2001-3 provides that the Service will not
ordinarily issue rulings or determination letters regarding any matter in
which the determination requested is primarily one of fact, for example,
market value of property, or whether an interest in a corporation is to be
treated as stock or indebtedness.
Section 5 of Rev. Proc. 2001-3 sets forth those areas under extensive study
in which rulings or determination letters will not be issued until the
Service resolves the issue through publication of a revenue ruling, revenue
procedure, regulations, or otherwise.
Section 5.01 of Rev. Proc. 2001-3 provides that the Service will not issue
rulings or determination letters on whether a solid fuel other than coke or a
fuel produced from waste coal is a qualified fuel under o29(c)(1)(C). Waste
coal for this purpose is limited to waste coal fines from normal mining and
crushing operations and does not include fines produced (for example, by
crushing run-of-mine coal) for the purpose of claiming the credit.
Section 5.01 of Rev. Proc. 2001-3 supersedes Rev. Proc. 2000-47, 2000-46
I.R.B. 482. Rev. Proc. 2000-47 was published because concern had been raised
that taxpayers were claiming the o29 credit for processing coal in ways that
may not have been intended by the Congress. Rev. Proc. 2000-47 requested
comments concerning the standard to be applied in determining whether fuel
produced from coal is a solid synthetic fuel. The Service received extensive
comments.
Section 29 provides a credit against income tax for the production and sale
of "qualified fuels" produced from a nonconventional source. Section
29(c)(1)(C) provides that qualified fuels include liquid, gaseous, or solid
synthetic fuels produced from coal (including lignite).
Rev. Rul. 86-100, 1986-2 C.B. 3, adopts for purposes of o29(c)(1)(C) the
definition of synthetic fuel in o 1.48-9(c)(5) of the Income Tax Regulations.
Section 1.489(c)(5)(ii) provides that, to be "synthetic," a fuel must differ
significantly in chemical composition, as opposed to physical composition,
from the substance used to produce it. Rev. Rul. 86-100 describes favorably
processes such as gasification, liquefaction, and production of solvent
refined coal that result in substantial chemical changes to the entire coal
feedstock rather than changes that affect only the surface of the coal.
Section 29(f) provides that o29 applies to qualified fuels that are produced
in a facility placed in service after December 31, 1979, and before January
1, 1993, and that are sold before January 1, 2003. Section 29(g)(1)(A)
provides that a facility for producing qualified fuels described in o29(c)
(1)(C) is treated for this purpose as being placed in service before January
1, 1993, if the facility is placed in service before July 1, 1998, pursuant
to a binding written contract in effect before January 1, 1997. For a
facility that meets this condition and is originally placed in service after
December 31, 1992, o29(g)(1)(B) provides that the o29 credit applies to
qualified fuels that are sold before January 1, 2008.
Property is "placed in service" in the taxable year the property is placed in
a condition or state of readiness and availability for a specifically
assigned function. See, for example, o 1.167(a)11(e)(1)(i). Thus, the o29
credit is not allowed for fuel produced in a facility that was originally
placed in service for a function other than producing qualified fuel under
o29(c)(1)(C) and was not converted into a facility for producing qualified
fuel until after June 30, 1998.
The Service interprets o29(f) and (g) to allow the o29 credit for qualified
fuel produced in a facility after its modification only if the modification
was placed in service before July 1, 1998, or does not significantly increase
the production capacity of the facility or significantly extend the life of
the facility. For example, a facility (including one of multiple facilities
located at the same site) may be relocated without affecting the availability
of the credit if all essential components of the facility are retained and
the production capacity of the relocated facility is not significantly
increased at the new location. If, however, the essential components of a
single facility are combined after June 30, 1998, with other components that
were not part of the facility on June 30, 1998, to create multiple facilities
or significantly increase production capacity, the credit will not be allowed
for fuel produced at any of those facilities.
After reviewing the comments received in response to Rev. Proc. 2000-47 and
reconsidering its interpretation of o29(c)(1)(C), the Service has decided
that the significant chemical change standard of Rev. Rul. 86-100 is the
correct standard. The Service has also decided to resume the issuance of
rulings under o29(c)(1)(C), but only in the circumstances described below.
The Service is willing to issue rulings that do not go beyond the processes
approved in the rulings issued prior to 2000. One procedure common to all of
those processes (other than processes for the production of coke and similar
products) is the use of elevated temperature and pressure to produce
briquettes, pellets, or an extruded fuel product. The Service is also willing
to rule with respect to a process that omits this procedure if the process is
otherwise consistent with a process approved in a pre-2000 ruling and the
omission of the procedure will not significantly increase the production
output of the facility. Accordingly, the Service will issue rulings regarding
whether a solid fuel (other than coke) is a qualified fuel under o29(c)(1)(C)
under the circumstances described in section 3 of this revenue procedure.
SECTION 3. PROCEDURE
The Service will issue rulings that a solid fuel (other than coke) produced
from coal is a qualified fuel under o29(c)(1)(C) if the conditions set forth
below are satisfied and evidence is presented that all, or substantially all,
of the coal used as feedstock undergoes a significant chemical change. The
conditions are that:
1. The feedstock coal consists entirely of coal fines or crushed coal
comprised of particles no larger than 1/8 inch;
2. The feedstock coal is thoroughly mixed in a mixer: (a) with styrene or
other monomers following an acid bath, (b) with quinoline (C9H7N) or other
organic resin and left to cure for several days, (c) with ultra heavy
hydrocarbons, or (d) with an aluminum and/or magnesium silicate binder
following heating to a minimum temperature of 500 degrees Fahrenheit; and
3. The treated feedstock is subjected to elevated temperature and pressure
that results in briquettes, pellets, or an extruded fuel product, or the
taxpayer represents that the omission of this procedure will not
significantly increase the production output of the facility over the
remainder of the period during which the o29 credit is allowable.
SECTION 4. EFFECTIVE DATE
This revenue procedure applies to all ruling requests, including any pending
in the national office and any submitted after the date of publication of
this revenue procedure.
SECTION 5. EFFECT ON OTHER DOCUMENTS
Section 5.01 of Rev. Proc. 2001-3 is revoked.
DRAFTING INFORMATION
The principal author of this revenue procedure is David McDonnell of the
Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Passthroughs and Special Industries).
Other personnel from the IRS and Treasury participated in its development.
For further information regarding this revenue procedure contact Mr.
McDonnell on (202) 622-3120 (not a toll-free call).

Copyright , 2001 by The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc., Washington D.C.


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/11/2001
01:05 PM ---------------------------

Kevin Kindall@ENRON
03/15/2001 10:51 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Project writeup


I think we need to get scheduling, volume management, and accounting together
somehow.  I don't think a happy hour would do it because people tend to get
in their groups and talk.

Let me know what you guys think.  I would like to talk to Bob Hall and Bob
Supperty about this,.


Following please find the Daily EnronOnline Executive Summary.

EnronOnline Executive Summary for 03/07/2001
Transaction Summary
External Transactions Today	4,852
Average Daily External Transactions (30 day Trailing Avg)	4,485
Total Life to Date Transactions	747,599

EnronOnline Daily % of Entity's Total Transactions for 03/07/01	Trans	Percent
Enron North America	3,351	76%
Enron Europe Limited	413	55%
Global Markets	327	43%
Enron Metals	761	26%

EnronOnline Percentage of Total Corporate Transactions
(30 day Trailing Avg)	55%

Gross Notional Value of EnronOnline Transactions	Total
Today	3,432,076,746
MTD	11,866,161,483
LTD	452,309,815,390
Average Daily Notional Value (30 Day Trailing Avg)	2,535,311,218

Notional Revenue from Physical Flows to Date	33,612,804,650

Counterparties, Users, and Products Offered
Counterparties having transacted to date	699
New Counterparties transacting for the first time today	2
Number of Products Offered Today	1,464
Total Number of External Users Logged on Today	3,490
Average # of External Users logged on (30 day Trailing Avg)	3,446


how can we get that girl cassie to go?  do i need to invite her roomate?
hull could keep her occupied.


Please find attached the latest edition of the referenced publication prepared by Corporate HR Analysis & Reporting.

Please provide any comments or suggestions to:

      Norm Levine	             Stacey Dempsey
       x-35010	                  x-30945

<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>


Thanks, Vince.  I will get moving on it right away.

Molly

Vince J Kaminski
02/21/2001 05:55 PM
To: Molly Magee/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: A resume for John Lavorato

Molly,

Please, make arrangements for the interview with this candidate for
a  trading position. Interviews with John Lavorato, Jeff Shankman,
Gary Hickerson, Stinson Gibner.

I talked to him in New York and he is considering
other opportunities, so we have to act fast.
I think John will like him more than Punit.

Thanks


Just curious, what was Nick doing when he visited Houston the beginning of November.  Just wondering, because I didn't know he was here.

Stacey

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Postlethwaite, John
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 3:41 PM
To:	White, Stacey W.
Subject:	RE: Relocation assistance

Thanks

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	White, Stacey W.
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 1:40 PM
To:	Postlethwaite, John
Cc:	De Jesus, Frank
Subject:	RE: Relocation assistance

As long as HR is ok with this, so am I.

Stacey
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Postlethwaite, John
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 3:35 PM
To:	White, Stacey W.
Subject:	Relocation assistance

Stacey, part of my relocation package was the $700/month mortgage subsidy. In May, I received the first installment for one year and due to the current situation with the company and with Enron at this point unsure about helping with a potential move back to Houston, I wanted to receive the second installment as soon as possible. Frank is ok with this, but I wanted to check with you before anything else is done.

John


Sorry, I can't, for the life of me, get your email address right.  My
apologies.

Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 04/10/2001 08:21 PM -----

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	04/10/2001 08:21 PM

		 To: Eric Letke/HOU/EES@EES, hgovenar@enron.com, Scott Govenar
<sgovenar@govadv.com>, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: SD Cap

Hi Hedy, Scott, Sandi:

Any news on signing of SB 43? Eric Letke mentioned that Sony--a potential
customer--told him that the Governor signed it on Friday and that they (Sony)
had a representative at the signing.  Any news would be great.  Thanks a
bunch.

Best,
Jeff


Enron is forming a new organization - - the Enron Xcelerator - - to drive the
formation and development of new businesses at Enron.  Enron's unique ability
to start and develop new businesses has driven most of our growth over the
years.  Lou L. Pai, currently Chairman and CEO of Enron Energy Services, will
lead the Xcelerator.  Over his years at Enron, Lou has been key to the
creation and rapid growth of our wholesale gas, wholesale power and energy
service businesses.  The existing business units will continue their
development of core businesses, while the Xcelerator will be responsible for
developing new business opportunities that are natural extensions of Enron's
business model and core skills, but not currently under development elsewhere
in Enron.

Dave Delainey, currently President and CEO of Enron Americas, will become
Chairman and CEO of Enron Energy Services.  Dave brings a wealth of
experience and accomplishment from Enron Wholesale Services' businesses where
he led the growth of our Canadian business and our North American origination
activity and, most recently, had a great year in Enron Americas.

Dave is forming an Office of the Chairman in EES.  Joining Dave in the Office
of the Chairman are Dan Leff, President of EES, Global Energy Services, and
Marty Sunde, President of EES, Global Marketing and Services.  Dan and Marty
have been instrumental in the development and execution of the successful EES
business model.  Also joining the Office of the Chairman of EES is Janet
Dietrich as Chief Operating Officer.  Janet, currently is Managing Director
in Enron Americas, where she has been successful in many of Enron Wholesale's
core businesses, including gas trading, risk management and structural
origination.  Tom White will continue as Vice Chairman of EES and will focus
on the development and expansion of EES' customer relationships.  Lou, Tom,
Dan, Marty and the entire EES organization have developed a great business
model with great growth prospects.  EES has become an essential part of
Enron's market valuation and growth story.  This new leadership structure
will enable EES to continue on its path of sustained growth and increasing
profitability.

John Lavorato will succeed Dave as President and CEO of Enron Americas.  John
has been an essential part of Enron's energy trading success over the years
and is a key part of Enron Wholesale Services' continuing success story.
Joining John is Louise Kitchen, currently President and CEO of Enron
NetWorks.  Louise, who accelerated Enron's outstanding growth with the
deployment of EnronOnline, will take over as Chief Operating Officer of Enron
Americas.

Philippe Bibi, currently Chief Operating Officer of Enron NetWorks will take
over as President and CEO of Enron NetWorks.  Under Philippe's leadership,
Enron has become a technology leader and the leading e-commerce company.
Joining Philippe as Chief Operating Officer is Greg Piper, currently Managing
Director of Enron NetWorks.  Greg currently leads Enron NetWork's origination
activity and was responsible for the creation and deployment of ClickPaper,
Enron's successful online pulp and paper marketplace.

Please join us in congratulating all of these individuals on their
achievements and their new responsibilities.


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 02/12/2001
11:19 AM ---------------------------

VKaminski@aol.com on 02/09/2001 01:14:51 PM
To: vkamins@enron.com
cc:
Subject: TradeSpark

Want to send this story to another AOL member? Click on the heart at the top
of this window.

TradeSpark says online energy trades top $16 bln

 ?
NEW YORK, Feb 8 (Reuters) - Online energy exchange Tradespark said Thursday
it has handled energy trades with a notional value of more than $16 billion
since trading began on Oct 2, 2000.

TradeSpark (www.tradespark.com) said natural gas instruments accounted for
over $9 billion of the trades logged to date, and electricity instruments
for
about $6 billion.

More than 125 companies and roughly 550 traders are registered to use
TradeSpark to execute their energy trades, the company said in a statement.

In January, traders who did not work for one of TradeSpark's founding
partners accounted for 58 percent of all trades, up from 48 percent in
December.

TradeSpark's founding partners include electronic commerce firm eSpeed Inc. <
ESPD.O>, brokerage Cantor Fitzgerald, energy firms Williams Cos. <WMB.N> and
TXU Corp. <TXU.N> and Royal Dutch/Shell <RD.AS> <SHEL.L> affiliate Coral.

Dynegy Inc. <DYN.N> has announced plans to become a partner at a later date.


Jim:

Yes, Susan is the lead and I have a call in to her now to see if she is coming up for the conference next week.  In response to your earlier email about filling in the Team Coverage chart due to Tom Briggs' departure, this is what Linda and Rick and I talked about earlier this week (you were unable to come to the meeting because you were at the EPSA Reg Affairs meeting).

Tom was on the Standards of Conduct team and was the inside counsel writing out comments.  Leslie has agreed to write all of the comments with support on our native load position from Christi and me on an as needed basis.

Tom was the lead on the market based rate inquiry.  We put Donna on as the lead for that proceeding.  She's been following it pretty closely and is on top of the FERC process/procedure aspect of whatever needs to be done.  Alan will provide the technical consulting part (and we may need outside consulting as well) but Donna will be responsible for organizing the team and doing an initial draft of the comments (if or when we need to write comments).

Tom was on a couple of other teams, but because he was not taking a lead role, I don't think he needs to be replaced.

Let me know what you think.

Sarah

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Steffes, James D.
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 10:18 AM
To:	Novosel, Sarah
Subject:	FW: FERC ANOPR on Generator Interconnection

Is Susan the lead??

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Jackie Gallagher" <JGallagher@epsa.org>@ENRON
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 8:57 AM
To:	acomnes@enron.com; Hawkins, Bernadette; Nersesian, Carin; Nicolay, Christi L.; Fulton, Donna; Scheuer, Janelle; Hartsoe, Joe; Shelk, John; jsteffe@enron.com; Noske, Linda J.; Robertson, Linda; Alvarez, Ray; Shapiro, Richard; Novosel, Sarah; Mara, Susan; Lindberg, Susan; Hoatson, Tom
Subject:	FERC ANOPR on Generator Interconnection

Last night, FERC issued an Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANOPR) on Standardizing Generator Interconnection Agreements and Procedures.  The ANOPR incorporates the ERCOT interconnection procedures, modified by various "best practices" identified by the Commission in an attachment.  A public meeting has been scheduled for November 1st in Washington, although the notice of the meeting is not yet available.  We will forward it when it becomes available.  The ANOPR is attached.

 - rm02-1.pdf << File: rm02-1.pdf >>


The EES IT toll-free number has been disabled.  Enron has a toll-free number that is available to all employees - 1-800-97 ENRON (1-800-973-6766)

To contact the EES IT Helpdesk:
?	Call 1-800-973-6766
?	Select 1 to transfer to an extension within the Enron Building
?	Select 39797 and you will be transferred to the helpdesk.

The following options are also available through the toll-free number:

0:  Connect to voice directory
1:  Transfer to an extension in the Enron building
2:  Access voicemail in the Enron building
3:  Transfer to 3 Allen Center
4:  Transfer to Omaha
5:  Transfer modem or fax with 646 prefix
6:  Speak to an Enron operator
7:  Transfer to a fax machine in the message center
8:  Transfer to Aviation
9:  Leave a confidential message for Enron Chairman

Please contact x3-9797 with any questions or comments.


We received a copy of an Assignment, effective as of May 1, 2000,  between
Mega Natural Gas Company, L.L.C. ("Mega") and Cross Timbers Oil Company (the
"Cross Timbers") wherein Mega assigned the Transactions outstanding under the
Master Agreement dated February 2, 1999 between ENA and Mega to Cross
Timbers.

 1. The Master Agreement between Mega and ENA, dated as of February 2, 1999
(the "Mega Master Agreement") will be inactive.   NO TRADES SHOULD BE DONE
UNDER THIS MASTER AGREEMENT.

 2. All trades should be done under the Master Agreement between Cross
Timbers and ENA, dated as of January 1, 1995 (the "Cross Timbers Master
Agreement").

 3. We have prepared a Transfer and Termination Agreement between ENA and
Cross Timbers whereby the Transactions under the Mega Master Agreement will
be transferred to the Cross Timbers Master Agreement and the Mega Master
Agreement will be terminated.   This document has been forwarded to Cross
Timbers for execution.  Once this document is executed by Cross Timbers, we
will terminate the Mega Master Agreement.

 In connection therewith, Cross Timbers Oil  Company notified us of the
following series of mergers:

  1. On May 1, 2000, Spring Resources, Inc., an Oklahoma corporation, and
Mega Natural Gas Company, L.L.C., an Oklahoma limited liability company, were
the owners of certain oil and gas properties (or undivided interests therein)
and contractual obligations (collectively, the &Properties8).

  2. On May 1, 2000, pursuant to a Certificate of Merger, each of Spring
Resources, Inc. and Mega Natural Gas Company, L.L.C., was merged into its
parent company, Spring Holding Company, a Delaware corporation.  Pursuant to
the merger, Spring Holding Company became the sole owner of the Properties.

  3. On May 10, 2000, pursuant to a Certificate of Merger, Spring Holding
Company was merged into its parent company, Redwine Holdings LLC, a Delaware
limited liability company.  Pursuant to the merger Redwine Holdings LLC
became the sole owner of the Properties.

  4. On May 10, 2000, pursuant to a Certificate of Merger, Redwine Holdings
LLC was merged into its parent company, Cross Timbers Oil Company, a a
Delaware corporation.  Pursuant to the merger, Cross Timbers Oil Company
became the sole owner of the Properties.

  5. After the mergers described above, Cross Timbers Oil Company is the sole
owner of the Properties formerly owned by Spring Resources, Inc. and Mega
Natural Gas Company, L.L.C.

  Copies of the documents will be distributed.


In preparation for the upcoming move to Enron Center South we are moving your Home Directories to a new trading cluster.

WHAT YOU NEED TO DO:
This will occur for you this EVENING after 6PM.
We will need to restart your computer in order to complete this action.
Please log out or your computer by 6PM, if the machine is not logged off we will reboot the machine in order to complete these actions.
Save your data before going home this evening.
If you have outstanding circumstances that we should address, please reply to this e-mail and we will change our schedule accordingly.

HERE ARE A FEW OF THE BENEFITS OF THIS ACTION:
Newer, more stable environment
More disk space available for common data
Faster network connections

HOW THIS WILL EFFECT YOU:
If you are a laptop user and have to work at home, you should save any work to your 'C:' drive on the laptop.  DO NOT use the "My Documents" folder.  When you return to work and reconnect to the network, any changes made to files/folders in the "My Documents" folder may be deleted from the laptop.
Laptops reconnecting to the network for the first time will receive a synchronization error.

RESOLUTION:
Please call the Resolution Center (x3-1411) and they will correct the problem ASAP.
We will have additional Technicians available on the floor if the Resolution Center has any problems.


Jeff--please put me on your list for any updates to the CA DA situation, including the proposed legislation.  Also, please send me any updates you have sent out since the meeting last Fri.  Thanks.  MDS


Subject:	Contact Info

Adrian Woolcock
6442 Olympia Dr.
Houston TX 77057
awoolco@msn.com
713-781-7456

As a result of the current situation, I am sure everyone here is evaluating the direction in which they will take their career.  Pursuant to this I have attached my contact info so that we can all keep in touch.  I too feel its been a experience great working here and learning everything I have for the past 5 years, and I wouldn't trade this experience for anything.  I hope everyone tries to stay in touch. if you would like to keep in touch as we move on to pursue other endeavors across the country, city, state please let me know your contact info as well. Lets keep our spirits high and keep giving 110% as long as the opportunity to do so exists...


Stinson,

Should we do it?

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 11/22/2000
08:08 AM ---------------------------

ARSystem@mailman.enron.com on 11/21/2000 07:04:54 PM
To: vince.j.kaminski@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Approval is Overdue: Access Request for stewart.range@enron.com

This request has been pending approval for  2 days and you are the
alternate.  Please click
http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000007876&Page=
Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000007876
Approver            : stinson.gibner@enron.com
Request Create Date : 11/20/00 2:36:29 PM
Requested For       : stewart.range@enron.com
Resource Name       : \\enehou\houston\common\Research - [Read/Write]
Resource Type       : Directory


Jim and Rick

Please read Mike Gildea's issue 2. I work with Mike closely on operating
policy issues.  He is with Duke NA, the IPP side, formerly with EEI.  I need
some help on where Enron stands on current legislation as it relates to his
question.

Do we think the language empowers NERC with too much authority?  Or does it
allow for any organization, i.e. GISB/EISB to perform the functions.

I know Enron agrees with NERC not imposing restrictions on the RTOs and slow
down market formation - but we certainly don't want to have to deal with
every RTO as a reliability standard setting organization.

---------------------- Forwarded by Charles Yeung/HOU/ECT on 04/27/2001 02:04
PM ---------------------------

"Michael F Gildea" <mfgildea@duke-energy.com> on 04/27/2001 01:36:40 PM
To: Charles.Yeung@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Re: NERC Issues

Charles,
1. I believe we need a conference call with yourself, Lydia and few others
to assess the landscape, come to a common position and goal here.  I
believe the ugly train has left the station  and we are in damage control
at the moment.    Optimally, we need the three of us on the same page when
we go to the TCCG meeting in Tampa,  from there we can try to spread our
common message.

2. On another front, - the reliability legislation.  I told our DC office
(not that they will listen) that the legisation NERC is pushing on the
Capitol Hill is now outdated and puts too much emphasis for standards in
NERC hands when the game today is inthe RTOs.  A powerful NERC may slow up
market development.   What is the view of Enron here?  I assume the same,
but curious.  Apparently, some Hill Staffers called our DC office for
opinions on the NERC reliability legislation - so something afoot.
Micheal

                    Charles.Yeung
                    @enron.com           To:     mfgildea@duke-energy.com
                                         cc:
                    04/27/01             bcc:
                    01:06 PM             Subject:     Re: when the LCA is not
the Sink

---------------------- Forwarded by Charles Yeung/HOU/ECT on 04/27/2001
01:05 PM ---------------------------

Charles Yeung@ECT
04/27/2001 12:53 PM

To:   LVollmer@pwrteam.com @ ENRON
cc:   Richard.Ingersoll@enron.com@ENRON, Charles.Yeung@enron.com@ENRON,
      mike_gildea@duke-energy.com@ENRON
Subject:  Re: when the LCA is not the Sink  (Document link: Charles Yeung)

I want to forward this to TCCG as agneda items for the Tampa meeting.

LVollmer@pwrteam.com on 04/27/2001 10:02:16 AM

To:   Richard.Ingersoll@enron.com
cc:   Charles.Yeung@enron.com, mike_gildea@duke-energy.com
Subject:  Re: when the LCA is not the Sink

Charles and Mike - At yesterday's Security Subcommittee meeting, a motion
passed to change SMEPA control area configuration in the IDC to reflect the
location of their share of generation in Entergy's territory that is needed
to serve their load.  The way the IDC was working was giving erroneous
information about an overload on the Weber-Richard line, which in fact was
not happening.  I tried to prevent this change for occurring stating that
policy 9 allows for the security coordinators to adjust the cut list when
known errors are occurring.

We need to have a definite action plan for how and when increased
granularity will be allowed to happen.  Lanny Nickell is suppose to make a
presentation at the next MIC meeting about this.  But we all need to be on
the same page to have an action plan in place that we can start shopping to
MIC members. I have volunteered to head a group to try to define the "end
state" of total granularity that we would ultimately want for the IDC and
the asociated costs to get there.

Another important issue that we need to address head on is the desire of
the SCs to allow for lowering of the impact thresholds for certain
flowgates that are now not getting relief at 5%.  I asked if this motion
was passed would it guarantee that less MW's will be cut in order to get
the relief needed -- the answer was no. Therefore, why should we support
any change?  This entire issue centers around a fundamental issue that has
existed from day one when flowgates were first allowed -- what are the
standards for allowing new flowgates?  To what extent should local problems
be addressed by the transmission provider with those problems, versus
putting the pain on the entire market place because the TP can't or won't
improve their transmission facility?  (In the first days of TLR, I raised
this issue over and over again when MAIN used a 500 kV line as a proxy for
the Albion Transformer -- which caused about 2,500 source-sink pairs to be
cut throughout the eastern interconnection).  This is an issue that
ultimately will be handled by the RTOs, but education is the key here as
flowgates are being defined around the country.

Another issue is OSL determination.  Ben Li has prepared Appendix 9C1A.
There was discussion at the meeting that implementing this would further
restrict transmission access.  The SCs are all over the board on this.  I
reminded them that the MIC had asked for data for each flowgate now in
existence for TLR purposes to define for us how they determine their own
limits -- I was told at this meeting  it was never done because there was
no agreement on how to measure the OSL.  So how, I asked, can a OSL be
determined via of a NERC standard?

I have real heartburn that NERC does not have any measurable standards for
allowing the items discussed above.  We have to force criteria and
measurable standards.

Let me know what you think.  Also, what we need to do to flesh out these
issues so everyone can understand them.

Lydia Vollmer
Exelon Power Team
300 Exelon Way
Kennett Square, PA 19348
610-765-6620
lvollmer@pwrteam.com

                    Richard.Ingersoll
                    @enron.com               To:
Charles.Yeung@enron.com
                                             cc:     bill.rust@enron.com,
dgcipriany@aep.com, drboezio@aep.com,
                    04/24/2001 11:05         hyan@pwrteam.com,
idcgtf@nerc.com, idcusers@nerc.com,
                    AM                       lvollmer@pwrteam.com,
pehoffer@aep.com, ringers@ect.enron.com,
                                             vapr@dynegy.com
                                             Subject:     Re: when the LCA
is not the Sink

Charles, I agree with you buti think we need to resist increased
granularity at this time. ?It will only decrease transmission and increase
TLR,s. ?Also the increase in transmission segments will make it more
dificult to put a transaction together.

                             Charles Yeung            ? ? ? ? To:
                                                      pehoffer@aep.com @
                             04/23/2001 06:28 AM      ENRON
                                                      ? ? ? ? cc:
                                                      idcgtf@nerc.com@ENRON
                                                      ,
                                                      idcusers@nerc.com@ENR
                                                      ON,
                                                      dgcipriany@aep.com@EN
                                                      RON,
                                                      drboezio@aep.com@ENRO
                                                      N, hyan@pwrteam.com,
                                                      lvollmer@pwrteam.com,
                                                      bill rust,
                                                      ringers@ect.enron.com
                                                      , vapr@dynegy.com
                                                      ? ? ? ? Subject:
                                                      Re: when the LCA is
                                                      not the SinkLink

This sounds like a tagging problem and not an IDC granularity problem.
Yes - this can be fixed with a IDC granularity change but does NERC want to
change IDC granualaruty on a piecemeal basis for this and the othe 14
control areas? ?What abot when these 15 control areas change to another
control area service provider? ?What about the next 15?

I don't think that AEP's customers actually disconnected from the AEP grid
and reconnected at some other point in another control area's transmission
network. The IDC is not mapping flows for that customer any more "wrongly"
than when that customer purchased control area services from AEP.

This is why hard criteria is needed to verify whether these 15 situations
require granularity change or whether ALL existing control areas need more
granularity for that matter.

Sent by: ? ? ? ?owner-idcgtf@nerc.com

To: ? ? ? ?idcgtf@nerc.com, idcusers@nerc.com
cc: ? ? ? ?dgcipriany@aep.com, drboezio@aep.com
Subject: ? ? ? ?when the LCA is not the Sink

We have been informed by one of our customers who serves a load which has
been electronically removed from the AEP Control Area that ?from now on
they will use the Electronic Control Area as the LCA, instead of using the
Physical Control Area (AEP) as the LCA. In this way, the Electronic Control
Area will be properly notified of any adjustments and approvals regarding
this transaction. Unfortunately, the IDC will be mapping the flow into one
CA while it's really going to another.

Our representative to the SSC will be arguing strenuously at their next
meeting that these types of situations need to be addressed. Historically,
the creation of a new control area has been the answer. Lou has indicated
that there are 14 of these situations pending in the Eastern Interconnect.


---------------------- Forwarded by Karen Denne/Corp/Enron on 05/15/2001
05:51 PM ---------------------------

Maureen McVicker
05/15/2001 03:31 PM
To: Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Janel Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: NERC Releases its 2001 Summer Reliability Assessment

FYI.

---------------------- Forwarded by Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron on 05/15/2001
03:30 PM ---------------------------

Charles Yeung@ECT
05/15/2001 09:10 AM
To: Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lloyd Will/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Ingersoll/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christi L
Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Dutta/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patrick Hanse/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan
Comnes/Enron@EnronXGate, Greg Wolfe/Enron@EnronXGate, Bill
Rust/Enron@EnronXGate, Kayne Coulter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Keith
Comeaux/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: NERC Releases its 2001 Summer Reliability Assessment

---------------------- Forwarded by Charles Yeung/HOU/ECT on 05/15/2001 09:08
AM ---------------------------

"Julie Morgan" <Julie.Morgan@nerc.net> on 05/15/2001 08:13:47 AM
To: "Gene Gorzelnik" <efg@nerc.com>
cc:
Subject: NERC Releases its 2001 Summer Reliability Assessment

Ladies and Gentlemen:

For Immediate Release:

The North American Electric Reliability Council (NERC) released its 2001
Summer Assessment today.  "The assessment concludes that California will
experience difficulties meeting its projected electricity demand this
summer," said Michehl R. Gent, NERC President and CEO, "and California
electricity users will experience rotating blackouts, much more so than
last summer or this winter."  The report also states that extreme
drought conditions throughout the Pacific Northwest will affect the
available output of hydroelectric resources.  "We expect that utilities
in the Pacific Northwest will be able to serve all of their firm demands
this summer," he added, "but they will not have electricity available to
export to California and elsewhere."

For your convenience, a copy of the press release announcing the 2001
Summer Assessment is shown below. In addition, this press release as
well as the subject reports are available from the NERC web site
www.nerc.com.

If you have any questions, let me know.

Sincerely,

Julie Morgan

=========================
Contacts: Ellen P. Vancko
evancko@nerc.com or
Eugene F. Gorzelnik
efg@nerc.com

May 15, 2001

NERC Releases its 2001 Summer Reliability Assessment

The North American Electric Reliability Council (NERC) released its 2001
Summer Assessment today.  "The assessment concludes that California will
experience difficulties meeting its projected electricity demand this
summer," said Michehl R. Gent, NERC President and CEO, "and California
electricity users will experience rotating blackouts, much more so than
last summer or this winter."  The report also states that extreme
drought conditions throughout the Pacific Northwest will affect the
available output of hydroelectric resources.  "We expect that utilities
in the Pacific Northwest will be able to serve all of their firm demands
this summer," he added, "but they will not have electricity available to
export to California and elsewhere."

In addition, the report cautions that New England, New York City, and
Texas should be closely watched, despite having adequate resources to
meet demand.  New England and New York City are particularly sensitive
to long-term heat waves and higher-than-expected generating unit forced
outages.  Texas will undergo a major shift in its operation in June when
it opens up to full retail access and consolidates ten control area
operations into one.  The report concludes that generating capacity
resources should be adequate to meet projected electricity demands in
other areas of North America this summer.

 The assessment also points to concerns regarding north-to-south
transmission transfer capability in the eastern portion of the United
States, particularly east of the Mississippi River.  The ability to
transfer electricity from the north to the south in the Eastern
Interconnection was severely tested last summer, spurred by cool
temperatures in the north and hot temperatures in the south, as well as
high fuel prices in the south.  Early indications are that key
transmission interfaces used to transfer electricity from north to south
are already fully subscribed going into this summer, and that
transmission congestion will again be prevalent in this area throughout
the summer.

 As a supplement to its 2001 Summer Assessment report, NERC also
published a 2001 Summer Special Assessment.  This document is an
in-depth, independent examination of the expected summer conditions in
both California and the Pacific Northwest, and is based on interviews
with experts from both the California Independent System Operator
(CAISO) and the Northwest Power Pool (NWPP).

 NERC's CAISO assessment agrees with the overall conclusions of
both the CAISO and the Western Systems Coordinating Council (WSCC) ? the
CAISO will not have sufficient resources to meet expected demand this
summer and involuntary curtailments of firm customer demand (rotating
blackouts) are expected.  NERC expects supply deficiencies to be greater
than those expected by the CAISO.  NERC anticipates that firm demand may
be curtailed for about 260 hours over the course of this summer, with an
average firm demand curtailment of about 2,150 MW.

 NERC expects that electric utilities in the NWPP will be able to
serve all their firm electricity demands this summer.  However, NWPP
will not have the ability to export the amounts of electricity it
traditionally has to California or elsewhere due to limited energy
output from hydroelectric facilities resulting from one of the worst
water years on record.

The independent reports, prepared by NERC's Reliability Assessment
Subcommittee, assess the projected demand and the resources available to
meet that demand this summer, as well as transmission reliability
issues.  The reports are posted on NERC's web site at www.nerc.com.  The
web site also includes information on NERC and its transformation into
NAERO, and the electric industry's electricity supply and delivery
programs and activities.

*********************
NERC is a not-for-profit company formed as a result of the Northeast
blackout in 1965 to promote the reliability of the bulk electric systems
that serve North America. It works with all segments of the electric
industry as well as customers to "keep the lights on" by developing and
encouraging compliance with rules for the reliable operation of these
systems. NERC comprises ten Regional Reliability Councils that account
for virtually all the electricity supplied in the United States, Canada,
and a portion of Baja California Norte, Mexico.


If you are looking to feed and challenge your faith, visit
Crosswalk.com's Spiritual Life Channel at:
http://spiritual.crosswalk.com
-----------
N E I L   A N D E R S O N   D A I L Y   D E V O T I O N A L
             from Freedom in Christ Ministries

January 22

SEEKING GOD'S FACE

My heart says of you, "Seek His face!" Your face, LORD, I will
seek (Psalm 27:8 NIV).

"If the sun is shining in the morning, I'll do it." "If he's
there when I open the door, I'll know he's the one." "If I pass
the class on world missions, I'll be a missionary. If not, I'll
be a local pastor."

We all know better than this, but it's amazing how often
scenarios just like these pop into our minds. Such propositions
are referred to as "laying a fleece" before the Lord or "seeking
a sign."

The term fleece comes from the account of Gideon. In Judges 6,
Gideon is called by God to deliver Israel from the Midianites.
Gideon questions whether God is even for Israel (verse 13), and
he doubts his own ability (verse 15). So he asks God for a sign
(verse 17). God gives him one, then tells him to tear down the
altar of Baal. Gideon is afraid to go during the day, so he goes
at night.

Then he questions again whether God will deliver Israel. This
time he puts a lamb's fleece on the ground. If God will deliver
Israel, then the lamb's fleece will be wet in the morning and the
ground around it will be dry. The next morning it is so. That
ought to satisfy him, right? Wrong! Wanting to be sure, and
hoping that God won't get too mad, Gideon asks Him to do it
again, but this time with the opposite result (i.e., the fleece
dry and the ground wet). Not exactly the stuff heroes are made
of. But God answers Gideon's request and then He reduces Gideon's
army down to 300 men!

The whole point of the passage is that God, not man, is the
deliverer. God chose a man desperately seeking assurance and
reduced an army down to nothing so that the victory would clearly
be His. The fleece wasn't a means of demonstrating faith; it was
just the opposite. And it certainly wasn't used to determine
God's will. God had already told Gideon what to do. Gideon was
questioning the integrity of God, just as we do if we ask for a
fleece when God has already shown us His will. "An evil and
adulterous generation craves for a sign" (Matthew 12:39). As
God's people, let's seek the face of God.

Lord, forgive me for the times I have looked for sign instead of
seeking Your face. I commit myself today to walk only in the
faith revealed in Your Word.

-----------
This daily devotional is published and distributed by
Crosswalk.com.  It is written by Neil Anderson at
< http://www.ficm.org >.

You can purchase "Daily in Christ" and other titles by Neil Anderson at
christianbook.com (Christian Book Distributors - CBD).
< http://shopping.crosswalk.com/bye/devo_na >

Additional devotionals are available from Crosswalk.com:
< http://devotionals.crosswalk.com >.
-----------
To read the Current Feature Story from ReligionToday,
go to http://religiontoday.crosswalk.com/CurrentFeatureStory/

For today's complete News Summary from ReligionToday,
go to http://religiontoday.crosswalk.com/CurrentNewsSummary/

-----------
For Copyright Terms go to http://www.crosswalk.com/info/copyright

____________________SUBSCRIPTION INFO_______________________

* You subscribed to Neil Anderson as:
         < jeff.king@enron.com >
* To unsubscribe from this newsletter immediately, click here:
         < http://link.crosswalk.com/UM/U.ASP?A3.14.261895 >
  If that link is not clickable, simply copy and paste it into
  your browser window.
* To change your address:  unsubscribe your old address
  and then subscribe your new address.
* To subscribe, send an email to:
  < SUBSCRIBE-neilanderson@lists.crosswalk.com > or go to
  < http://www.crosswalk.com/lists > for a complete list of
  our newsletters.
* Copyright ? 2001 Crosswalk.com, Inc. and its Content
  Providers. All rights reserved.

____________________________________________________________


In yet another Order issued yesterday (see attached), FERC rejects the request by Con Edison to extend the Revised Localized Market-Power Mitigation Measures (Revised LMM)* until October 31, 2002. The Revised LMM had been approved by FERC on July 20  (on rehearing after initially rejected them on May 16), but were required in that Order to expire on October 31, 2001. FERC denies Con Ed's requested extension because it was "procedurally improper," and directs the NYISO to address FERC's concerns regarding the revised LMM as part of the comprehensive mitigation proposal FERC required the NYISO to prepare by March 1 in its AMP extension order also issued yesterday. (An email regarding that Order has been sent to you separately.) In particular, FERC wants to know how the revised LMM will work in conjunction with other mitigation measures in effect or proposed; whether the mitigation is designed to apply only in must-run situations or more broadly and why; whether market conditions in NYC warrant structural triggers for market power mitigation; and whether in-city mitigation measures should apply to all generation in the City or just to the units divested by Con Edison. FERC again directs the NYISO to consider mitigation measures used by PJM and ISO-NE to aid in the transition to a Northeast RTO. Finally, FERC directs Con Ed and the NYISO to make a filing that removes all in-city mitigation measures from Con Ed's tariff and puts them into the ISO's tariff. Significantly, FERC directs the NYISO to address in that filing, "and remedy to the extent required in NYISO's tariff and in the operations of NYISO and ConEd, allegations...that ConEd currently has operational responsibility for the New York City transmission grid and can direct out-of-merit dispatch. Ultimate responsibility for such functions, if not hands-on operational control, must lie with NYISO rather than ConEd." Elimination of ConEd's ability to dispatch units out-of-merit is crucial to the proper functioning of the markets in New York City. Development of the comprehensive market mitigation plan called for in both this and the AMP order by March 1 is going to be an enormous and time consuming undertaking for the NYISO and market participants over the next three months.
----------------
* The Revised LMM expanded the application of the LMM approved by FERC in 1998 as part of Con Ed's generation divestiture proposal to: (1) bids for sale of energy in the real time markets during constrained periods; (2) bids for min gen and start-up whenever gen must be operated out-of-merit due to local reliability requirements; (3) bids for start-up and min gen during constrained periods (i.e., whenever mitigation would apply to a unit's incremental energy bid); and (4) all generators located electrically within NYC, not just those divested by Con Edison.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lauren Mildren [mailto:lmildren@bracepatt.com]
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 2:24 PM
To:	Andrea Settanni; Yeung, Charles; cnicola@enron.com; Fulton, Donna; hfromer@enron.com; snovose@enron.com; Lindberg, Susan
Subject:	ER01-1385 ConEd v. NYISO -- Special Market Power MitigationMeasures for NYC


Hey woman!  What are you doing talking to my pregnant chic?  I going to tell her that anything bad you said about me is a lie.

AND YES, all I do is goof off.  What else is there to do?

How's your boy doing?  How are the cats?  How's the job?  How old are you?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Veselack, Joni" <joni.veselack@neg.pge.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Wednesday, January 09, 2002 12:50 PM
To:	Germany, Chris
Subject:	Chrisssssssssssyyyyyyyyyyy

What's going on.... I talked to your women yesterday. She said all you do is
goof off all day.

PG&E National Energy Group and any other
company referenced herein that uses the PG&E name or
logo are not the same company as Pacific Gas and
Electric Company, the regulated California utility.  Neither
PG&E National Energy Group nor these other
referenced companies are regulated by the California Public
Utilities Commission.  Customers of Pacific Gas and Electric Company
do not have to buy products from these companies in order
to continue to receive quality regulated services from the utility.


<<5-17-01.pdf>>

Richard Costigan, III
Chief of Staff
Office of the Assembly Republican Leader
California State Assembly
Phone:(916) 319-2005

 - 5-17-01.pdf


Check out page 16 and the $12.3 B of open position that DWR is showing as on
the hook for in 2003 thur 2004.   This flies in the face of the MOU which
states that the open short reverts to Edison after 12/31/02.  Half baked, I'd
say.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 7:33 PM
To: Tribolet, Michael
Subject: Edison MOU

----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 04/25/2001 07:32 PM -----

	Scott Govenar <sgovenar@govadv.com> 04/25/2001 07:13 PM 	   To: Hedy Govenar
<hgovenar@govadv.com>, Mike Day <MDay@GMSSR.com>, Bev Hansen
<bhansen@lhom.com>, Jeff Dasovich <jdasovic@enron.com>, Susan J Mara
<smara@enron.com>, Joseph Alamo <JAlamo@enron.com>, Paul Kaufman
<paul.kaufman@enron.com>, Michael McDonald <Michael.McDonald@enron.com>,
Sandra McCubbin <Sandra.McCubbin@enron.com>, Rick Shapiro
<rshapiro@enron.com>, Jim Steffes <james.d.steffes@enron.com>, Alan Comnes
<acomnes@enron.com>, Steven Kean <Steven.J.Kean@enron.com>, Karen Denne
<kdenne@enron.com>, "Harry.Kingerski@enron.com" <Harry.Kingerski@enron.com>,
Mike D Smith <msmith1@enron.com>, Leslie Lawner <Leslie.Lawner@enron.com>,
Robert Frank <rfrank@enron.com>, Ken Smith <ken@kdscommunications.com>, Janel
Guerrero <Janel.Guerrero@enron.com>, Miyung Buster <Miyung.Buster@enron.com>,
Jennifer Thome <Jennifer.Thome@enron.com>, Eric Letke <eletke@enron.com>,
Mary Schoen <Mary.Schoen@enron.com>  cc:   Subject: Edison MOU

Sandi asked me to forward the attached cost benefit analysis from
Governor Davis regarding the Edison MOU.

http://www.governor.ca.gov/govsite/pdf/issues/benefit-cost_final.pdf


On or about 5/2/01we opened the above counterparty to transact Canadian/US
Currency Swaps on EnronOnline (which they cannot transact under the old
Master Energy Price Swap Agreement, they would have to transact udner the
GTC).  After discussing this counterparty w/Sara Shackleton, an attorney in
the swap group, it appears that Sara has been talking to Morgan Stanley and
Morgan Stanley does all its interest rate & currency business out of Morgan
Stanley Capital Services, Inc.  We can keep Morgan Stanley Capital Group open
for currency swaps, but if they don't trade currency swaps out of that
company we'll know why.  Sara is already working on an ISDA Master for
Capital Services for Gary Hickerson's group.


Dear Colleagues,

We know you have many questions about your new benefits plan, payroll issues and other changes that will occur over the next few weeks. Human Resources and Communications are preparing a thorough Q&A, which we will send to you tomorrow and will regularly update as more information is available.

Meanwhile, please read the announcement below from Security about how you can obtain a new UBS Warburg access card that will allow you to enter our new office space after Friday.

I am confident that you share my enthusiasm about our new opportunity.  We look forward to working along side each of you in the coming days.

David Oxley
Head, Human Resources
____________________________________________________________________

Access Cards

There will be a two-day transition for the new UBS Warburg access cards. Beginning Monday, February 11, access to the 5th and 6th floors of Enron Center South will require these new cards. UBS Warburg access cards can be picked up from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. at the reception area on the 5th floor of Enron Center South on Thursday, February 7th ; Friday, February 8th ; and Monday, February 11. Enron Security will produce new access cards with existing photographs, then simultaneously issue the new and collect the old cards. Employees without UBS Warburg cards will be allowed into the Enron Center South building on Monday but will have to collect their new cards as soon as possible to gain access to the 5th and 6th floors.

Employees who fail to collect their new cards by 7 p.m. Monday will be required to contact Enron Security's general information number at 713-853-5360 to arrange to pick them up.

There will be security staff available at the pick up point on ECS 5 to help with any problems you might have.

It is suggested employees wear their access cards at all times while on the premise.

Accessible Areas - The new cards will allow UBS-W employees to enter:
5th & 6th floors and Plaza area of Enron Center South ,
The Sky Ring
Body Shop, Enron Center North Plaza and therefore access the Credit Union and Cafeteria from either building.

Restricted Areas - Employees must submit to Enron Security a Restricted Access Request form (available by calling 713 8535360 ) and signed by Bob McAuliffe (713-853-7468) to enter:
Enron Center South, 8th and 9th floors
Enron Center North, 22nd and 34th floor
Ardmore Data Center.

Employees staying with the Enron estate while visa and other issues are completed - Employees in this group who are on assignment arrangements to UBS-W will be issued a regular access card - available in the same way as other new UBS-W employees.

Estate employees who are working with UBS-W on transition issues  - If they will be based in UBS-W office space they should talk to their UBS-W counterpart for approval and then UBSW HR for the issue of a UBS-W contractor card (in addition to their regular Enron badge).


Larry and raetta, cand we make sure we do not bill for the vented gas.  Can we work with measurement and redcue
the actuals by the 8,000 to 10,000?  Steve, does anyone have the exact volume vented?  Thanks. Lynn

Steven January
06/01/2001 01:11 PM
To:	Gary Spraggins/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lynn Blair/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Richard Barry/OTS/Enron
cc:

Subject:	Re: Warren Eunice

Lynn, how would we handle this Accounting wise? Since it went through our meter, the customer is going to get credit for this gas and transportation, which he should not. We need to get this situation stopped. They should blow gas upstream of the meter.  Gary, can you check with Bandel and get an approximate volume that has been vented? Richard, great job in bringing this to our attention. sj

Gary Spraggins
06/01/2001 01:04 PM
To:	Steven January/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject:	Warren Eunice

It was brought to my attention this last weekend that when Warren Eunice goes sour and our valve shuts, there is a blow off valve down stream of our measurement that Warren  personnel are using to vent the sour gas until it turns sweet. So, while they are venting the gas we still show flow of 8,000 to 10,000 which is measured as if we received the gas. I have notified Bob Bandel and he is looking into the situation. They were not aware that this was happening. Richard brought this to my attention.

Gary

<Embedded StdOleLink>


Connie:

As you begin to tie down the assumptions on the various models, I would like
to conduct "model reviews" like we used to do in EI.  A single meeting where
the commercial people responsible for the business and relevant functional
people all gather with you and I (I would also suggest Rick Buy attend) to
review the model and the key assumptions.  The goal is less of a "police"
function and more of an education process to increase understanding of the
business.

Also, I think I am going to want someone dedicated to reviewing the work on
the Dabhol model as we consider various renegotiation scenarios.  The
decision making is too important to not have oversight.

Lastly, have you reviewed the modeling (both in ESA and at RAC) done on
Cuiaba in connection with the recent board presentation?

Jim


Good morning everyone:

Vince would like to schedule a follow-up meeting on Wharton as soon as
we can agree on a time.

How does Monday the 18th look for you?  Vince is free from 9:30 AM -
11:30 AM and from 1:00 PM - 4:00 PM.

Please let me know if you are available during any of these times.

Thanks!

Shirley Crenshaw
3-5290


Attached is the one I did for Mirant.  Remember to refer to the memo from Kim Theriot which I previously routed to everyone.  This draft includes the considerations of Francisco and Brent as well.  Note the isda paper/pulp provision was also added because the Mirant isda was old.

Cordially,
Mary Cook
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith, 38th Floor, Legal
Houston, Texas 77002-7361
(713) 345-7732
(713) 646-3393 (fax)
mary.cook@enron.com


---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 11/13/2000
11:48 AM ---------------------------

c.john.thompson@enron.com on 11/13/2000 09:33:25 AM
To: ddelain2@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Approval for reviewer

THOMPSON,C J  has suggested reviewers and submitted them for your approval.
You may review/modify this list of reviewers by logging on to PEP at
http://pep.corp.enron.com  and going to Supervisor Services.  Please
remember, no feedback can be completed on THOMPSON,C J  until you have
approved the list.


Reminder,

The following are the dates that you are registered and confirmed for the outside trainings.

Nexus: Avoiding the Long Arms of the States

October 19, 2001	Crowne Plaza, Houston

Mark Ng
Mary Fischer
Kathleen Ashton

Taxation of Financial Products & Derivative Transactions

October 29, 2001	JW Marriott, Houston

Mark Ng
Mary Fischer
Kathleen Ashton
John Swafford

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks,
selma
x3-1765


paperloop.com
SAN FRANCISCO, July 18, 2001 (paperloop.com) - North American market pulp prices tumbled for the seventh time in as many months on seasonal weak demand and continued papermaker downtime. Benchmark northern bleached softwood kraft (NBSK) declined 7.4 percent or $40/tonne to $500/tonne, while other pulp grades fell less.
Some producers indicated they "have no list" prices anymore as deals have increasingly occurred on a case-by-case basis, while one major producer said it had abandoned its list two months ago and has simply discounted.
The sustained drop in prices prompted both sellers and buyers to note last week that even suppliers holding low inventories aren't able to leverage themselves in pricing. A large-volume buyer source said that his firm's discounts "are anywhere from 5 percent to double digits," even off the latest prices.
Many producers continued offloading pulp to markets such as China, South Korea and Taiwan as prices there appear to have leveled off at low levels. Market watchers last week expressed concern with global inventories and the wholesale exports to non-Japan Asian markets.
"I'm concerned with what will happen (to inventories) through July and August," said a Canadian industry consultant, who said that although pricing dynamics could improve after September, producers may fight inventory surges all year. "I hope they don't overproduce. This cycle is harsher than most cycles because of paper downtime."
Salomon Smith Barney analyst Chip Dillon noted in a report that the latest inventories are, "well above the 1.5 million tonne 'inflection' level...total inventories combined typically rise over 230,000 tonnes during July and August (so) we believe pulp prices will remain under pressure."
Various North American producers have declined selling pulp to Asian markets on below cash-cost prices, but buyers there continue to bargain hunt from second or third suppliers. Because of lower operating costs and the availability of cheap NBSK, a buyer source said that his firm's paper machines are profitably running at 100 percent through the summer season. "Some suppliers have more inventory than others and have no choice but to sell," noted the buyer.
Meanwhile, several pulp producers have attempted to offset poor demand conditions by further curtailing production. Tembec Inc. said it would slash its pulp output by at least 100,000 tonnes during the third quarter, matching the downtime it had taken through the first two quarters combined. Although Tembec didn't announce which mills or grades of pulp would be affected, an industry source said that Tembec was taking a month of downtime at its Crestbrook mill in Skookumchuck, B.C. With capacity to produce 227,000 tonnes/yr of NBSK, the mill's downtime would represent about 19,440 tonnes.
Weyerhaeuser recently told customers it would take about 54,000 tonnes of primarily NBSK market-related downtime during the third quarter. A Weyerhaeuser official said its mill in Prince Albert, Sask., would trim about 14,000 tonnes of NBSK and NBHK; 24,000 tonnes of NBSK would be cut at its mill in Grand Prairie, Alta., at a time to be determined later; and its Kamloops, B.C., mill would cut 16,500 tonnes of NBSK during outages in August and September.
Additionally, the official expected that incremental tonnage would be lost during some maintenance downtime during the quarter. The downtime at Weyerhaeuser "reflects softness in fine paper demand," said the official. "Demand to Europe is particularly soft and with the strong dollar we have currency issues."
Other producers are reducing supplies without acknowledging their curtailments. Producer sources in British Columbia said that Celgar Pulp Co. in Castlegar, B.C., would shut down production for about 35 days due to market reasons. With capacity to produce about 425,000 tonnes/yr of NBSK, the outage could clip about 42,490 tonnes from supplies.
A source at Western Pulp Ltd. said the Vancouver, B.C., firm had extended the shutdown its 255,000 tonne/yr NBSK pulp mill in Squamish due to continued soft demand. The downtime, which began on June 1, is expected to total six weeks, said the source. Western Pulp's Squamish operation will likely cut at least 30,000 tonnes from supplies during the closure, said the source.
In Wisconsin, an NBHK mill is currently shut down for market reasons and a company source said it would chop about 20,000 tonnes from production before restarting later this month.
"In the fourth quarter, these kraft mills can't shut down," said the source. "You have to run during the winter, but right now you can take a mill down. If the downtime isn't taken now, you will see a real bloodletting in the fourth quarter."


If you could send all the paperwork to me, that would be fine.

Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	<Joe_B_Fulmer@comerica.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+3CJoe+5FB+5FFulmer+40comerica+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Thursday, July 12, 2001 2:33 PM
To:	Shankman, Jeffrey A.
Subject:	RE: education plan

Sounds fine.  If you will e-mail me the telephone number for Rachel, I will be
happy to coordinate with her.  Would you please notify her that I will be
calling soon.  Thank you.  Joe.


Start Date: 1/11/02; HourAhead hour: 2;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002011102.txt


Payables

Effective today, the responsibility for Accounts Payables has been moved to Global Strategic Sourcing under the leadership of George Wasaff.  He, along with the Accounts Payable team, is pleased to announce a number of system enhancements based on your valuable feedback.

Delegation of Authority
iPayit now enables you to identify a delegate to code, review, or approve invoices on your behalf.  The system provides you with the flexibility to:
*  Identify a delegate as a coder, approver, or reviewer
*  Define the length of time that you would like to delegate your authority
*  Select whether the delegate will assume your approval amount, maintain their own approval amount, or assume a specific approval amount

Incorrect Company Code
Incorrect company code?  No problem!  The invoice will no longer return to Accounts Payable for correction before you are able to code the invoice.  iPayit enables you to select the correct company code and continue coding.

Additional Enhancements
*  In addition to Quick Forward, you can now Quick Approve invoices
*  Invoice comments can now be easily viewed from your in-box

Introducing iPayit
With so many new systems, you told us that it was easy to confuse Payables with iBuyit eProcurement.  To help clear up that confusion, we are pleased to announce that this new and improved version has a new name:  iPayit.
*  To access iPayit, visit the iBuyit Portal or http://iPayit.enron.com.
*  Look for e-mail notifications from <mailto:ipayit@enron.com>.

Sneak Peak
For a preview of the enhancements and how to use them, click on the link below:
http://home.enron.com:84/messaging/ipayitsyspres.ppt

This is just the beginning!  We have created a committee that is dedicated to improving the Accounts Payable process.  We hope to engage you in this effort and plan to actively seek your involvement and input.  We look forward to working with and hearing from you about future enhancements that will enable iPayit to play a valuable role in your invoice payment activities.

For invoice payment status please call the AP Call Center at (713) 853-7127 or toll free  (866) AP ENRON, or send an e-mail to <mailto:ipayit@enron.com>.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Ken Lay - Office of the Chairman
Sent:	Thursday, November 08, 2001 10:05 AM
To:	DL-GA-all_enron_worldwide
Subject:	Dynegy Discussions

Enron and Dynegy each announced today that they are holding discussions about a possible merger of the two companies.  As you know, Dynegy is a major player in the energy marketplace, and is not only a competitor, but also a counterparty of Enron.  This is just one of several options that we are considering.

Upon receipt of this announcement, the NYSE briefly suspended trading of both Enron and Dynegy.  We have no additional information we can share at this time.  We'll keep you updated as developments occur.


---------------------- Forwarded by Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT on 04/19/2000
02:01 PM ---------------------------

System Administrator <postmaster@uniteddc.com> on 03/28/2000 10:28:59 AM
To: Judy.Hernandez@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Undeliverable: Tear jerker! Get a tissue.

Your message

  To:      Yvonne Acosta; Regina Blackshear; Michelle Neville; Angela
Barnett; Leslie Smith; Eve Puckett; Amber Limas; Amber Ebow; Lisa Shoemake;
Maria Sandoval; Rose Botello
  Subject: Tear jerker! Get a tissue.
  Sent:    Tue, 28 Mar 2000 10:35:08 -0600

did not reach the following recipient(s):

Dora.Thurmond@uniteddc.com on Tue, 28 Mar 2000 10:28:58 -0600
    The recipient name is not recognized
 The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=United DC,
Inc.;l=EXCHANGE_SRVR0003281628H5QKWG2S
    MSEXCH:IMS:United DC, Inc.:UNITED_DC:EXCHANGE_SRVR 0 (000C05A6) Unknown
Recipient

Message-ID: <862568B0.005B0F0D.00@notes.ect.enron.com>
From: Judy Hernandez <Judy.Hernandez@enron.com>
To: Yvonne Acosta <Yvonne.Acosta@enron.com>, Regina Blackshear
<Regina.Blackshear@enron.com>, Michelle Neville
<Michelle.Neville@enron.com>, Angela Barnett <Angela.Barnett@enron.com>,
Leslie Smith <Leslie.Smith@enron.com>, Eve Puckett  <Eve.Puckett@enron.com>,
Amber Limas <Amber.Limas@enron.com>, Amber Ebow  <Amber.Ebow@enron.com>, Lisa
Shoemake <Lisa.Shoemake@enron.com>,  Maria Sandoval
<Maria.Sandoval@enron.com>, Rose Botello  <Rose.Botello@enron.com>
Subject: Tear jerker! Get a tissue.
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 10:35:08 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
X-MS-Embedded-Report:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

---------------------- Forwarded by Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT on 03/28/2000
10:29
AM ---------------------------

"SOCORRO HERNANDEZ" <SUHERNAN@LLGM.COM> on 03/27/2000 04:16:37 PM

To:   <judy.hernandez@enron.com>, <irenepepe@hotmail.com>, "A. SUE
      GONZALES-GUEVARA" <AGUEVARA@LLGM.COM>, "HERBERT NORMAN"
      <HNORMAN@LLGM.COM>, "KATHY MARIE MOORE" <KMOORE@LLGM.COM>, "MARIA
      THOMPSON" <MTHOMPSO@LLGM.COM>, <bandama@ssa.co.orange.ca.us>,
      <hernaev@ssa.co.orange.ca.us>, <Bburrell@tmh.tmc.edu>,
      <maryloulou@yahoo.com>
cc:
Subject:  Tear jerker! Get a tissue.

Like any good mother, when Karen found out that another baby was on the way,
she
did what she could o help her 3-year-old son, Michael, prepare for a new
sibling. They found out that the new baby was going to be a girl, and day
after
day, night after
night, Michael sang to his sister in Mommy's tummy. He was building a bond
of
love with his little sister before he even met her.  The pregnancy
progressed
normally for Karen of Morristown, Tennessee. In time, the labor pains came.
Soon
it was every five minutes, every three ...every  minute.  But serious
complications arose during delivery and Karen found herself in hours of
labor.
Would a C-section be required?  Finally, after a long struggle, Michael's
little
sister was born. But she was in very serious condition.  With a siren
howling in
the night, the ambulance rushed the infant to the neonatal intensive care
unit
at St. Mary's Hospital, Knoxville, Tennessee.

The days inched by. The little girl got worse. The pediatrician had to tell
the
parents,  "There is very little hope. Be prepared for the worst." Karen and
her
husband contacted a local cemetery about a burial plot. They had fixed up a
special room in their house for their new baby but now they found themselves
having to plan for a funeral. Michael, however, kept begging his parents to
let
him see his sister. "I want to sing to her," he kept saying.  Week two in
intensive care looked as if a funeral would come before the week was over.
Michael kept nagging about singing to his sister, but kids are never allowed
in
Intensive Care.

Karen made up her mind, though. She would take Michael whether they liked it
or
not! If he didn't see his sister right then, he may never see her alive.
She
dressed him in an oversized scrub suit and marched him into ICU.  He looked
like
a walking laundry basket. But the head nurse recognized him as a child and
bellowed, "Get that kid out of here now! No children are allowed."
The mother rose up strong in Karen, and the usually mild-mannered lady
glared
steel-eyed right into the head nurse's face, her lips a firm line.
"He is not leaving until he sings to his sister!"
Karen towed Michael to his sister's bedside. He gazed at the tiny infant
losing
the battle to live.  After a moment, he began to sing. In the pure-hearted
voice
of a 3-year-old, Michael sang: "You are my sunshine, my only sunshine, you
make
me happy when skies are gray >>---"
>>Instantly the baby girl seemed to respond. The pulse rate began to calm
down
and become steady. "Keep on singing, Michael," encouraged Karen with tears
in
her eyes.
"You never know, dear, how much I love you, Please don't take my sunshine
away-"
As Michael sang to his sister, the baby's ragged, strained breathing became
as
smooth as a kitten's purr. "Keep on singing, Sweetheart!" "The other night,
dear, as I lay
sleeping, I dreamed I held you in my arms..."
>>Michael's little sister began to relax as rest, healing rest,seemed to
sweep
over her.  "Keep on singing, Michael."  Tears had now conquered the face of
the
bossy head nurse. Karen glowed. "You are my sunshine, my only Sunshine.
Please
don't, take my sunshine away..."
>>The next, day...the very next day...the little girl was well enough to go
home!  Woman's Day Magazine called it "The Miracle of a Brother's Song." The
medical staff just called it a miracle.
Karen called it a miracle of God's love!

 NEVER GIVE UP ON THE PEOPLE YOU LOVE. LOVE IS SO
INCREDIBLY POWERFUL.
Life is good. Have a Wonderful Day!

This is the power of prayer at work.  Let's continue to pray for
one another.

PRAYER:
May today there be peace within you. May you trust God that you are exactly
where you are meant to be. May you not forget the infinite possibilities
that
are born of faith. May you use those gifts that you have received, and pass
on
the love that has been given to you. May you be content knowing that you are
a
child of God. Let His presence settle into your bones, and allow your soul
the
freedom to sing, dance, and to bask in the sun. It is there for each and
every
one of you. Send this to others and witness the awesome power of prayer.
Also,
read Phil 4:13


Diana says Amerex told her both deals were on the same ticket - so she
entered deal 577201at 50 mw. I asked her to get ahold of her contact at
Amerex to tell them they're checking out incorrectly.

Thanks,
Kate

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
04/11/2001 08:36 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: 4/10 checkout con't

What's the status?

AMEREX
I see several sales to Puget in Diana's blotter at a $375 price, only one
with Amerex, and it's for 50 MW. I'll need to get ahold of her in the morning
to verify the brokers on these. I'll let you know as soon as I do.

   Kate Symes @ ECT                04/10/2001 06:35 PM

To: Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: 4/10 checkout con't

BLOOMBERG
577573 - changed to Aquila
577533 - added .005 broker fee

AMEREX
577873 - LTNW sells EES/Cal'07-Cal'10/Off Peak/$44.50

PREBON
577849 - Jeff Richter buys BP (changed broker to Prebon)

AMEREX
I see several sales to Puget in Diana's blotter at a $375 price, only one
with Amerex, and it's for 50 MW. I'll need to get ahold of her in the morning
to verify the brokers on these. I'll let you know as soon as I do.

Thanks,
Kate

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
04/10/2001 03:15 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: 4/10 checkout con't

PREBON WEST

Jeff Richter
I am missing this deal:
Enron buys BP Energy Q4 SP-15 $205.00

AMEREX WEST

Dianna Scholtes
Amerex is showing the following deals on their checkout that I did not verbal:

1) Enron sells to Puget 4/11 25 mw of Mid-C at $375
2) Enron sells to Puget 4/11 25 mw of Mid-C at $375

Mike Swerzbin
Amerex  is showing the following deals on their checkout that I did not
verbal:
1) Enron sells to EES 25 mw of Cal'07- Cal'10 off-peak Cobb at $44.50 fee of
.0075

BLOOMBERG

Mike Swerzbin
deal 577573
Bloomberg shows the cp as Aquila and enpower has Idaho Power

Matt Motley
deal 577533
Bloomberg show fee of $.005


I just ran a forward ob for April 2 to check for deals that are in PST when
they should be PDT.

Do you want to change all of these to PPT deals, or do you have time
constraints today?  I need these changed today because we are already setting
up for April.

SW Regions
347721
353734
353813
407053
352524
361210
352809
346646
346647
352628
360473
360475
360477
360483
361244
366541
366543
346822
348162

NW Regions
318870
349864

I am particularly worried about how these are corrected because they are long
term transmission deals that cannot be autoscheduled.
503107
503112


Gerald,

I have 62 contracts in  a box that I will be routing to you for your review.
These are active Columbia Energy Services Contracts that are not setup in our
Global Contracts system.  We would like for you to make a legal determination
whether to setup the contracts in our system or not.  Attached please find a
spreadsheet to indicate whether or not to setup these contracts and your
comments.

Once completed, please forward the spreadsheet back to Sylvia Campos.

Marlene Hilliard


We are continuing work to ensure our new online trading system, UBSWenergy, is ready for launch on the week of Feb. 11, which is the week following the anticipated Enron/UBS Closing Date of Friday, Feb. 8.

To assist in this process, we are planning an online trading simulation for Thursday, February 7 from  0900 to 1100 (CST). It is planned to include all  traders, originators, mid/back-office staff and IT teams who would normally be involved with electronic trading.

Purpose of the simulation - The simulation will test our "live" trading environment (restricted to internal access only) and will:

Test the integrity and functionality of the system and related processes (including credit, risk, legal, operations, etc.)
Provide an opportunity for traders to verify their products and product setup
Demonstrate how the trading system and processes work to UBS staff visiting next week

Nature of the simulation - The simulation will include testing of all processes related to trading and mid/back-office functions:

Credit, Legal, Risk, Operations, and other groups:
Profile tests for "external" customers (role-played by Originators)
Profile tests for internal users (traders, back-office, etc.)
Data and Process checking as completed transactions flow through Mid/back-Office systems

Traders and Originators:
Traders will be managing their individual books and associated products. Although we may be restricted to certain financial products on launch day, both physical and financial will be available during the simulation. Each trader will be asked to manage their individual position and profitability goals for the simulation.
Originators and others will be asked to play the roles of counterparties. Credit limits, etc. will be tested during the simulation.

Information Technology:
Will assist in preparing data on the system for the simulation.
After the simulation is over, will work with the relevant groups to test the trade-data in various systems and risk books
Will ensure all simulation data is removed from the system after the simulation is complete.

Next steps

Traders and Originators will be contacted prior to simulation day to ensure they have appropriate access to the system.
Originators will be assigned specific roles. You should expect to receive an email and/or handout on or before Wednesday, Feb. 6.
UBSWenergy personnel will be meeting with back office personnel over the next several days to ensure everything is in place for the simulation.

Summary

This simulation is an important step towards re-launching our trading business. We appreciate the participation of everyone involved as we prepare for the public launch of UBS Warburg Energy and the UBSWenergy trading platform.

If you have any questions, comments, suggestions, or ideas regarding this simulation, please feel free to contact Bob Shults (30397) or myself (31861).

Regards,
Dave Forster
713.853.1861
E-Mail:	David.Forster@enron.com


Do you agree?
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 10/26/2000
01:12 PM ---------------------------

John L Nowlan
10/26/2000 12:55 PM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Liquids Limits Oct.25

Jeff this is no violation at all. These are arbitrary limits that were put in
to give us a feel for where our exposure is. We have just changed the
methodology of these,so the big move in the product numbers.

To: Christian LeBroc/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: John L Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Liquids Limits Oct.25

Is this a violation, or are we just shifting portfolios around.  Jeff

	From:  Christian LeBroc @ ENRON                           10/26/2000 10:58 AM

To: Hugo Moreira/LON/ECT@ECT, David J Botchlett/HOU/ECT@ECT, John L
Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Chismar/SIN/ECT@ECT, John Buckner
Thomas/SIN/ECT@ECT, Scott Earnest/HOU/ECT@ECT, Risk Controls@ECT, Mary
Thambiah/LON/ECT@ECT, Oliver Gaylard/LON/ECT@ECT, Bjorn
Hagelmann/HOU/ECT@ECT, Manfred Roenz/Corp/Enron@Enron, Lee
Jackson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Homan Amiry/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark Fondren/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Swinney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cindy Horn/LON/ECT@ECT,
Michelle Bruce/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Liquids Limits Oct.25