Hi Vince

I'd originally been told you wouldn't be back until Wednesday, and so have
another meeting booked for 4:30pm (London time) today.  I really need to
speak with you about the situation here in London re Anjam.  To be blunt,
Sharad, Kirstee and I have all been tempted to just walk out of the office
until Anjam is removed.  The major problems are:
1. I have no authority to demand Anjam should cooperate with Sharad, Kirstee
etc. on their work.  He does his best to impede their work, and I have no
ability to access his drives for data/spreadsheets.
2. Anjam removes me from the cc lists in reply to all emails received by him,
in an attempt to remove me from the loop.
3. Anjam continues to "do business", and people in London still think he's
head of Research.
4. Pending your "announcement", people will continue to go to Anjam, and the
business will remain dependent on him.
5. We're severely under-resourced.  I'm still awaiting your review of the
email I drafted for John S, requesting additional resource.  I can't make a
big recruitment drive until I have the authority to hire more.
I honestly feel I can't do my job, and I'm currently asking myself what I'm
even doing here.

Notwithstanding the above, here is the current picture with our projects:

Steve
1. Initiated new pre-trade system for oil trading desk.  Hooked up relevant
IT resource with business people, keeping an overall eye on making sure the
business reqts get translated into IT-speak.
2. Enron Direct demand forecasting system review.
3. Initiated global supply/demand database with coal group.
4. Constant firefighting across all desks.

Ben
1. Work on regression-based placement model.
2. General review of EnronCredit.com's quant models.

Matthew
1. Ongoing work with EnGOAL.
2. Produced first prototype of gas capacity charge optimisation tool for
Continental Gas desk.  Need to purchase local copy of CPLEX.

Kirstee
1. Diverted from Richard Lewis's request for the UK gas/power vol curves to
be sorted out, onto Eastern Virtual Power Station restructuring project.
Involves extension runs of credit reserve model, and now it seems the model
needs to be extended.
2. Constant VaR firefighting.

Slava
1. Finished all regressions and model identification for UK gas and power
demand forecasting.  We are now ready to start IT implementation.
2. Enron Direct demand forecasting system review.

Sharad
1. Exotica support/firefighting, made nearly impossible by Anjam.
2. Option on strip of metals futures for Enron Metal.

I do hope we get a chance to speak and resolve some of these issues.  I'm
really not happy at present.

Best regards,
Steve


[IMAGE]
 	 	    Dear Andrew,  On Thursday, ENL's Stephanie Stanton is traveling to Florida to cover the groundbreaking ceremony for the new Gulfstream Natural Gas Pipeline.  The 744-mile pipeline is a joint venture between Duke Energy and Williams Energy, the parent company of ENL.  Florida Governor Jeb Bush and Alabama Governor Don Siegelman are scheduled to attend the ceremony, and we're crossing our fingers for a chance to speak with the governors about several issues.  Log on Thursday for coverage from Florida.   Tuesday, California Gov. Gray Davis threatened to bring a lawsuit against the FERC.  ENL's Washington Bureau Chief Jay Cranford says the bureau will follow the developments surrounding Gov. Davis and the FERC on Thursday.  Jay also reports, an important deadline for the FERC Market Monitoring and Mitigation Order is coming up on Friday.  The Cal ISO has until the close of business Friday, June 1 to submit an RTO proposal to the FERC.  The Washington bureau is scheduled to discuss all the action surrounding the FERC on Thursday.        ENL has a lot going on from the Houston bureau tomorrow as well.  Correspondent Kim Benestante says there is a report out saying power deregulation in Pennsylvania has failed.  The Houston bureau will bring us details and compare and contrast deregulation in Pennsylvania with Texas.  Kim also reports, Texas' Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railways will complete the industry's first coal-transportation option auction.  We'll have these stories and more from the Houston bureau on Thursday.    Also from the Houston bureau on Thursday, Centric Energy Group Principal Tom Gilhooley is scheduled to join us.  He's dropping by the bureau to discuss NYMEX crude and gasoline prices.  Be sure to catch the Gilhooley interview in the noon ET newscast.   From New York on Thursday, New York Independent System Operator Steve Sullivan is scheduled to join us.  He's stopping by to discuss the 11:00 a.m. ET news conference on the summer energy outlook for New York.  Sullivan will be with us in the 1:00 p.m. ET newscast.     Keep in mind things are subject to change at a moment's notice.  Occasionally guests cancel or change time slots.  We'll continue to do our best to keep you updated on future interviews and events.     Keep it on energynewslive.com  for all your energy news.
 			[IMAGE]
	 	Jay Rickerts, EnergyNewsLive.com Anchor  View today's Energy Wrap  video: (Windows Media Player required) Broadband  (100k)   |  Dial-up  (56k)  Get  Windows Media Player   Experience all that Williams Energy  News Live has to offer!   If you are receiving this letter for the first time and wish to continue,  subscribe now    To stop receiving this letter,   unsubscribe now     If you are having trouble receiving this e-mail, please let us know  or  call (800) WILLIAMS (800-945-5426) weekdays, 7am-7pm CST.    Comments? Suggestions? Let us  know  or  call (800) WILLIAMS (800-945-5426) weekdays, 7am-7pm CST.    Copyright 2001 Williams Energy News Live, LLC. All  Rights Reserved.


TO: The Enron ESC Working Group
DATE: December 30, 1999

I am forwarding you copies of the Energy Services Coalition letter to the ESC
membership with attached ESC Task Paper.

Happy New Year.

Joe Hillings


Kern River discovered a mechanical problem with an oil seal at the Fillmore
Compressor Station in Utah. Fillmore will be inoperable while repairs are
made Nov. 30, but no impact to firm capacity is expected. However,
interruptible capacity will be reduced as necessary for the Nov. 28-29 gas
days and will not be available Nov. 30.

Northwest noted that despite putting its system into entitlement and issuing
a realignment OFO, primary scheduled volumes through Kemmerer (WY) Station
remain greater than physical capacity. Therefore, starting today the pipeline
is invoking a "must-flow OFO" provision of its tariff. Until further notice,
shippers with primary corridor rights southbound through Kemmerer are
required to flow up to 10% of their contract demand from receipt points north
of Kemmerer to delivery points south of Kemmerer or take some other mutually
agreeable action to alleviate the Kemmerer capacity problem. See the
Northwest bulletin board for details.

El Paso:  Saying linepack had stabilized, El Paso canceled Wednesday an
Unauthorized Overpull Penalty alert that had been issued Monday


----- Forwarded by Sue Nord/NA/Enron on 02/01/2001 01:37 PM -----

	"Pisciotta, Aileen" <APisciotta@KelleyDrye.com>
	01/31/2001 12:20 PM

		 To: "'sue.nord@enron.com'" <sue.nord@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Articles of Interest

Dear Sue -- Here are a couple of articles of possible interest we wanted to
send you.

Best regards.  Aileen.

***************************************************************
`TECH SEVEN' LEGISLATIVE PACKAGE
WILL GET QUICK ACTION, BURNS SAYS

Quick action on new telecom and Internet-related legislation is
being promised by Senate communications subcommittee Chairman
Conrad Burns (R., Mont.).  Sen. Burns, who dubbed his high-tech
agenda for the previous Congress the "Digital Dozen," plans to
unveil a package of telecom and Internet bills next week that
will be called "The Tech Seven" this time around.

A spokesman said Sen. Burns' agenda will include a few "holdover
bills" that didn't make it through the 106th Congress, as well as
"some surprises."  They include proposals to expand deployment of
broadband services using low-power TV spectrum, to ease reporting
requirements for small incumbent local exchange carriers, and to
lift the caps on universal service support, the spokesman said.

The other "top priorities" on Sen. Burns' agenda are bills to
bolster online privacy and to curb "spamming."  Sen. Burns also
may address the process by which the Internet Corporation for
Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) selects Internet domain name
suffixes through legislation or through the subcommittee's
oversight capacity, the spokesman said.

Member assignments for the Senate communications subcommittee are
expected to be announced later this week.  Sources say Republican
freshmen George Allen (Va.) and John Ensign (Nev.) share the
inside track for the panel's vacant GOP spots, while Democrat
John R. Edwards (N.C.) is considered a lock to fill one of the
Democratic seats.

Meanwhile, efforts to organize the House telecommunications
subcommittee have bogged down in a debate over whether to add
seats to the full House Energy and Commerce Committee, says
committee spokesman Ken Johnson.  "There's still a possibility
that additional members will be added to the Commerce Committee,"
he told TR.

Late today Mr. Johnson said Commerce still plans to meet tomorrow
(Wednesday) to vote on subcommittee assignments and to organize
for the 107th Congress.

***************************************************************
BROADBAND SERVICES, ONLINE PRIVACY TOP AeA's 2001 AGENDA

In a report sent to the White House and Congress today, the AeA
(formerly the American Electronics Association) recommends that
federal policymakers take a hands-off approach to regulating
"those sectors of the broadband market" that are served by
multiple providers. AeA's competitive markets include
"residential areas served by cable, DSL [digital subscriber
line], and satellite providers."

AeA calls for more efforts at the federal level to promote
competition in "sectors (such as multitentant buildings) where
there are bottlenecks to competitive entry."  And it says the FCC
should "continue to show regulatory restraint with respect to
emerging services, given the fact that the market for such
services, while still nascent, is functioning in a competition
fashion."

Briefing reporters in Washington today, AeA President and Chief
Executive Officer William T. Archey said the organization's
report reflects the views of AeA member companies that
participated in a series of "town hall meetings" held last year.

In addition to the telecom items, the report urges Congress to
extend the current three-year moratorium on new or
nondiscriminatory Internet taxes and permanently ban the taxation
of Internet access services.  It reiterates AeA's preference for
federal preemption of state privacy laws (TR, Jan. 22).

 <<Wireless internet>>  <<Internet tax credit bill>>

The information contained in this E-mail message is privileged, confidential,
and may be protected from disclosure; please be aware that any other use,
printing, copying, disclosure or dissemination of this communication may be
subject to legal restriction or sanction. If you think that you have received
this E-mail message in error, please reply to the sender.
This E-mail message and any attachments have been scanned for viruses and are
believed to be free of any virus or other defect that might affect any
computer system into which it is received and opened. However, it is the
responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no
responsibility is accepted by Kelley Drye & Warren LLP for any loss or damage
arising in any way from its use.
Message-ID: <9B6EDD2F810DD411A8FC00805FBB62D85652A2@DC03>
From: "Wilson, Heather M." <HWilson@KelleyDrye.com>
To: "Pisciotta, Aileen" <APisciotta@KelleyDrye.com>
Subject: Wireless internet
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 16:39:42 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="----_=_NextPart_002_01C08BB2.799FD4B2"

Here's the other article for Enron.

 http://cgi.mercurycenter.com/premium/business/docs/wireless24.htm

 - High-speed newcomer (1-24-2001).url
Message-ID: <9B6EDD2F810DD411A8FC00805FBB62D85652A1@DC03>
From: "Wilson, Heather M." <HWilson@KelleyDrye.com>
To: "Pisciotta, Aileen" <APisciotta@KelleyDrye.com>
Subject: Internet tax credit bill
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 16:31:24 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="----_=_NextPart_002_01C08BB2.799FD4B2"

Here is one of the articles I was mentioning might be good to send to Enron.

 http://www0.mercurycenter.com/svtech/news/breaking/merc/docs/068626.htm

 - Senators renew high-speed Internet tax credit bill (1-23-2001).url


A few critical tweaks based on current injury info:

Quarterbacks
1. Warner, StL
2. Manning, Ind
3. Favre, GB
4. Garcia, SF (Prob)
5. Brooks, NO
6. Stewart, Pit
7. Gannon, Oak
8. McNair, Ten (Ques)
9. Brunell, Jac (Prob)
10. Griese, Den
11. McNabb, Phi
12. Fiedler, Mia
13. Plummer, Ari
14. Weinke, Car
15. Green, KC
16. Wynn, Min
17. Johnson, TB
18. Grbac, Bal
19. Testaverde, NYJ
20. Chandler, Atl
21. Miller, Chi
22. Van Pelt, Buf
23. Flutie, SD
24. Collins, NYG
25. Banks, Was

Running Backs
1. Faulk, StL
2. Green, GB
3. Martin, NYJ
4. Holmes, KC
5. Thomas, Chi
6. Tomlinson, SD
7. Alexander, Sea
8. Smith, Mia
9. Williams, NO
10. Rhodes, Ind (Prob)
11. Hearst, SF
12. Mack, Jac
13. Davis, Den
14. Davis, Was (Prob)
15. Staley, Phi
16. Dillon, Cin
17. Pittman, Ari
18. George, Ten (Ques)
19. Garner, Oak
20. White, Cle
21. Ma'afala, Pit
22. Huntley, Car
23. Barber, NYG
24. Bryson, Buf
25. Alstott, TB
26. Warren, Det
27. Smith, Dal
28. Dunn, TB (Prob)
29. Bennett, Min
30. Allen, Bal
31. Smith, Atl (Prob)
32. Canidate, StL
33. Barlow, SF
34. Dayne, NYG
35. Zereoue, Pit (Prob)
36. Jones, Ari
37. Hambrick, Dal
38. Wheatley, Oak
39. Green, Ten
40. Richardson, KC
41. Levens, GB
42. Anderson, Den
43. Joseph, Jac
44. McAllister, NO
45. Christian, Atl (Prob)

Wide Receivers
1. Harrison, Ind (Prob)
2. Owens, SF
3. Smith, Jac
4. Bruce, StL
5. Holt, StL
6. Smith, Den (Prob)
7. Boston, Ari
8. Moss, Min
9. Horn, NO
10. Burress, Pit
11. Booker, Chi
12. Ward, Pit
13. Brown, Oak
14. Schroeder, GB
15. Rice, Oak
16. Johnson, TB
17. Conway, SD
18. Carter, Min
19. McCardell, Jac (Prob)
20. Mason, Ten
21. Chambers, Mia (Ques)
22. Freeman, GB
23. Johnson, Cle
24. Moulds, Buf
25. Jackson, NO
26. Jackson, Sea
27. Ismail, Bal (Prob)
28. Thrash, Phi (Ques)
29. Dyson, Ten
30. Price, Buf
31. Coles, NYJ
32. Alexander, KC
33. Toomer, NYG
34. Chrebet, NYJ
35. Morton, Det
36. Sanders, Ari
37. Hilliard, NYG
38. Stokes, SF
39. McKnight, Mia (Prob)
40. Westbrook, Was (Prob)
41. Galloway, Dal (Prob)
42. Proehl, StL
43. Gardner, Was
44. Ismail, Dal
45. Minnis, KC
46. Hakim, StL
47. Martin, Atl
48. Robinson, Sea
49. Pinkston, Phi
50. Williams, TB

Tight Ends
1.?Pollard, Ind
2. Gonzalez, KC
3. Clark, Den (Prob)
4. Sharpe, Bal (Prob)
5.?Wycheck, Ten
6.?Franks, GB
7.?Chamberlain, Min
8. Jones, SD
9.?Conwell, StL
10.?Sloan, Det
11. Becht, NYJ
12.?Riemersma, Buf
13.?Dilger, Ind
14.?Lewis, Phi
15. Williams, NO
16.?Johnson, SF
17.?Brady, Jac
18.?Moore, TB
19.?Crumpler, Atl
20. Magnum, Car
21.?Williams, Oak
22. Mitchell, Ari
23. Flemister, Was
24. Harris, Dal
25. Weaver, Mia

1. Wilkins, StL
2. Longwell, GB
3. Mare, Mia
4. Carney, NO
5. Hall, NYJ
6. Hollis, Jac
7. Cortez, SF
8. Janikowski, Oak (Ques)
9. Nedney, Ten
10. Edinger, Chi
11. Akers, Phi
12. Elam, Den
13. Brown, Pit
14. Kasay, Car
15. Vanderjagt, Ind
16. Stover, Bal
17. Lindell, Sea
18. Hilbert, Dal
19. Hanson, Det
20. Conway, Was
21. Christie, SD
22. Gramatica, TB (Ques)
23. Feely, Atl
24. Dawson, Cle
25. Oglesby, Ari

Defenses
1. New York Jets
2. Chicago
3. Green Bay
4. Philadelphia
5. Pittsburgh
6. Tampa Bay
7. Cleveland
8. Baltimore
9. St. Louis
10. San Francisco
11. San Diego
12. New Orleans
13. New York Giants
14. Denver
15. Miami
16. Carolina
17. Seattle
18. Tennessee
19. Jacksonville
20. Kansas City
21. Cincinnati
22. Washington
23. Oakland
24. Dallas
25. Detroit

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
cheatsheets-unsubscribe@egroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


Please print and ensure that Jose Bestard has this info.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	owner-cclist@nerc.com@ENRON   On Behalf Of "Julie Morgan" <Julie.Morgan@nerc.net>
Sent:	Monday, October 01, 2001 12:29 PM
To:	julie@nerc.com
Subject:	NERC: NERC Board Agenda Package

TO: Board of Trustees

Ladies and Gentlemen:

We are taking a new approach to the agenda and background material for
the Board meeting.

The agenda and action item pages only for each agenda item appear in one
document, with electronic "links" to the associated background material.
This document is now posted at
http://www.nerc.com/~filez/botagenda-101501.html. Links to the
individual background material are also available at this site so you
can access any and all of them for viewing or download, as you wish.

We will also post a complete agenda package, with all action item pages
and associated background material, for those that want the entire
package in one file.

Please let us know if you have any questions or have problems viewing
and downloading any part of the agenda.

Sincerely,

Julie Morgan

cc: Stakeholders Committee
    NERC Observers
    Regional Managers
    Invited Guests

p.s. The agenda and background material for the Stakeholders Committee
meeting will be available in a single document, with just references (no
electronic links) to those items that appear on the Board agenda.


apologies.  could you resend me the id and password to get into EOL.  thanks
a bunch.


Okay with me.  Go ahead and make your arrangements for the headset.

	Vanessa Griffin/ENRON@enronXgate
	05/08/2001 03:12 PM

		 To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Headset

I would like to order a headset for my telephone, much like the ones that
Taffy, Mary Helen and Carlos have.  Are you open to that and if so, will you
approve it?  It is just a matter of ordering it through Superior Headset
Service, Inc.

Vanessa Griffin
Enron Corp.
1400 Smith St., Suite 3867
Houston, TX 77002
(713) 853-5088


From :
              "Susan Lindberg" <susanlindberg14@hotmail.com>

          To :
              jim.steffes@enron.com

          CC :
              richard.shapiro@enron.com, frank.dejesus@enron.com,
christi.nicolay@enron.com

       Subject :
              notice

        Date :
              Mon, 31 Dec 2001 12:57:53 -0600

Jim, as we discussed by telephone, I have accepted a job offer with Duke and
my last day at Enron will be Tuesday, Jan. 1.

If you need to contact me, my home number is 713.663.6667 and mobile number
is 713.494.5002.

Susan Lindberg

_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com


This deal was entered today - Matt Motley was trying to agree on terms with
the broker, but they didn't get it all tied up until this morning. The deal
is as follows:

Buy Calpine
Palo Verde
25 MW
Q3-01
$300
Broker: TFS

Thanks,
Kate


I spoke to Andrea and she said that the commercial guys were taking care of
this issue.  This came up because during my trip a week and a half ago I
suggested they let Houston know about the deal so that no one was surprised
when the deal was executed.  They are trying to close the deal by the end of
the month.  I am not sure if they can pull everything together in time.
Additionally Diomedes told them that he does not want Electro buying the
power but wants a free customer of Electro buying the power which just
complicates things even further.  Do you have a time frame for when you can
come to Brazil yet?  Let me know when you do and Andrea Bertone will check on
the availability of Jose Emilio Pinto and Luis Mauer to spend some time with
us.  Talk to you later.
---------------------- Forwarded by Brent Hendry/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
28/07/99 12:53 PM ---------------------------

From: Patricia Cini@ECT on 28/07/99 10:41 AM CDT

To:   Brent Hendry/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:
Subject:  Brazil Transaction

FYI-

See the trasaction they are looking at below and Sue's response to their
ability to move forward.

Regards,

Pat

---------------------- Forwarded by Patricia Cini/HOU/ECT on 07/28/99 10:40
AM ---------------------------

From: Sue Frusco AT ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@CCMAIL on 07/28/99 02:03 PM

To:   "Andrea Bertone/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT" AT ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@CCMAIL, "Don
Black/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT" AT ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@CCMAIL, "Marcelo
Parodi/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT" AT ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@CCMAIL, "D'Arcy
Carroll/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT" AT ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@CCMAIL, "Gustavo
Junqueira/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT" AT ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@CCMAIL
cc:   Patricia Cini@ECT, Ted Murphy@ECT
Subject:  Brazil Transaction

Hey guys, I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but I just checked with Ted
Murphy and there is no authorization in place for trading transactions in
Brazil.  This is pretty serious, and I suggest that someone call Ted (x33324)
prior to execution to explain the deal and work through issues.

I know that Don had written a trading authorization memo, but since Ted has
not seen it, I assume that in the frenzy of business, it was not submitted.
The submission of an authorization memo to Ted for Rick Buy's and Jeff
Skilling's execution is standard practice and required prior to entering a
new market.   This is an interim step prior to going to the Enron Board for
formal approval of trading limits.

I understand that Don is in Houston on vacation and I'm trying to track him
down.

Sue
---------------------- Forwarded by Sue Frusco/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 07/28/99
07:18 AM ---------------------------

From: Patricia Cini@ECT on 07/26/99 05:33 PM

To:   Sue Frusco/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, William S
Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject:  Brazil Transaction

FYI-

Brazil is starting up it looks like although they still have some regulatory
issues that need to be resolved before we will see alot of transactions.  I
am going to ask the attorney in Sao Paulo, Andrea Bertoni, to summarize the
regulatory issues just so we can understand this market better.

The transaction below is what they are looking at for the time being.
Although I do not see large credit issues with this specific transaction, I
am going to forward a memo that Julio and I wrote that outlines the credit
procedures that need to be followed.

Regards,

Pat

---------------------- Forwarded by Patricia Cini/HOU/ECT on 07/26/99 05:26
PM ---------------------------

Claudia Brun@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
07/23/99 02:56 PM

To:   Patricia Cini@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:   Andrea Bertone/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Don
Black/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Marcelo
Parodi/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, D'Arcy
Carroll/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Gustavo
Junqueira/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject:  Brazil Transaction

Pat,

Per our conversation today, Enron Comercializadora de Energia Ltda (Enron's
entity which is authorized to trade in Brazil) is negotiating its first
transaction.  The details of the transaction are as follows:

BUY SIDE

Counterparties:          Companhia A?ucareira     Companhia Energ,tica
Vale do Ros?rio          Santa Elisa

Location:                Morro Agudo, S?o         Sert?ozinho, S?o
Paulo                    Paulo

Type of Energy           Interruptible            Interruptible
Contracted:

Contracted Amounts:      Up to 1.5 MW             Up to 1.5 MW

Contractual Period:      Aug 1 - Nov 30, 1999     Aug 1 - Nov 30, 1999

Contracted Tariff:       R$ 18.50/MWh less        R$ 18.50/MWh less
transmission costs       transmission
(estimated at: R$        (estimated at: R$
2/MWh)                   2/MWh)

Total Contractual        R$ 72,468 or US$         R$ 72,468 or US$
Obligations              40,260                   40,260

SELL SIDE

|-------------------------------------------------->
|Counterparties:                                   |
|-------------------------------------------------->
>--------------------------------------------------|
|Elektro Eletricidade e Servi?os S.A. (99.6% owned |
|by Enron)                                         |
>--------------------------------------------------|
|-------------------------------------------------->
|Location:                                         |
|-------------------------------------------------->
>--------------------------------------------------|
|S?o Paulo                                         |
>--------------------------------------------------|
|-------------------------------------------------->
|Type of Energy Contracted:                        |
|-------------------------------------------------->
>--------------------------------------------------|
|Interruptible                                     |
>--------------------------------------------------|
|-------------------------------------------------->
|Contracted Amounts:                               |
|-------------------------------------------------->
>--------------------------------------------------|
|Up to 3.0 MW                                      |
>--------------------------------------------------|
|-------------------------------------------------->
|Contractual Period:                               |
|-------------------------------------------------->
>--------------------------------------------------|
|Aug 1 - Nov 30, 1999                              |
>--------------------------------------------------|
|-------------------------------------------------->
|Contracted Tariff:                                |
|-------------------------------------------------->
>--------------------------------------------------|
|R$ 27/MWh                                         |
>--------------------------------------------------|
|-------------------------------------------------->
|Total Contractual Obligations                     |
|-------------------------------------------------->
>--------------------------------------------------|
|R$ 237,168 or US$ 131,760                         |
>--------------------------------------------------|

Feel free to contact us if you need further information.

Claudia


They want firm primary.
---------------------- Forwarded by Clarissa Garcia/HOU/ECT on 01/28/2000
02:08 PM ---------------------------

hboyd@columbiaenergygroup.com on 01/27/2000 07:37:46 AM
To: "        -         *Kinney, Doug" <dkinney@columbiaenergygroup.com>,
Cindy Vachuska/HOU/ECT@ECT, Clarissa Garcia/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip
Villagomez/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: "        -         *Herzog, Hans" <hherzog@columbiaenergygroup.com>
Subject: TGP - FEBRUARY FINAL O&R

Hey Guys,

My final   FIRM  number, per O&R ,   is 39.  This is a firm number and O&R
must
be a primary pt. with TGP.

Thanks!


Tana:

As we discussed, perhaps Bob should have a brief conversation with the
counterparty to confirm that an NDA is appropriate.  If the counterparty's
only concern is that they do not want to be obligated to disclose
confidential information in the course of any discussions with us, we are
happy to include the following provision in our NDA to make clear that it is
under no obligation to provide us with confidential information:

"Whether to disclose particular information remains the sole discretion of
the disclosing party and nothing hereunder obligates a party in any way to
disclose any information."

Leslie

	Tana Jones
	12/08/2000 08:56 AM

		 To: Bob Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: NDA-PVM Oil Associates Limited

----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 12/08/2000 08:55 AM -----

	David Hufton <dhufton@pvm.co.uk>
	12/08/2000 04:19 AM

		 To: Tana.Jones@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: NDA-PVM Oil Associates Limited

Thank you for the NDA . I would like to clarify that as we do not know what
Enron have in mind we cannot at this stage commit to furnish  information
which may be implied in the first sentence of the document . More
appropriate wording  may be  "in the event of the provision of information
" At 18:26 06/12/00 -0600, you wrote:
>At the request of Bob Shults, I am enclosing a copy of our proposed form of
>Non-Disclosure Agreement.  If you have any comments or questions, please do
>not hesitate to call me at (713) 853-3399, or email me your comments.
>
>(See attached file: PVM Oil.doc)
>
>

**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager. Unless stated to the contrary, any opinions
in this message are personal and may not be attributed to
PVM Oil Associates, Ltd.
**********************************************************************


Are you in debt? Having trouble paying it off? We can help!
We can consolidate your bills into just one monthly payment
and help achieve the following:

- Save you a lot of money by eliminating late fees
- Settle your accounts for a substantially reduced amount
- Stop creditors calling you on the phone
- Help avoid bankruptcy
- And more!

By first reducing, and then completely removing your debts,
you will be able to start fresh. Why keep dealing with the
stress, headaches, and wasted money, when you can
consolidate your debts and pay them off much sooner! To
obtain more information, with no obligations or costs,
please reply to this email, fill out the form below, and
return it to us. Your submission will be processed within
10 business days and you will be shortly contacted by one
of our informed staff. Thank you!

Full Name  :
Address    :
City       :
State      :
Zip Code   :
Home Phone :
Work Phone :
Best Time to Call   :
E-Mail Address      :
Estimated Debt Size :

**********
If this e-mail arrived to you by error, or you wish to
never receive such advertisements from our company,
please reply to this e-mail with the word REMOVE in the
e-mail subject line. We apologize for any inconveniences

6gc86


Start Date: 2/3/02; HourAhead hour: 20;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.


FYI
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 03/28/2001 11:04 AM -----

	Jean Munoz <jmunoz@mcnallytemple.com>
	03/27/2001 08:53 PM

		 To: Katie Kaplan <kaplan@iepa.com>, "'Andy Brown (E-mail)'"
<ABB@eslawfirm.com>, "'B Brown Andy (E-mail)'" <andybrwn@earthlink.net>,
"'Baker Carolyn (E-mail)'" <cabaker@duke-energy.com>, "'Bob Escalante
(E-mail)'" <rescalante@riobravo-gm.com>, "'Bob Weisenmiller (E-mail)'"
<rbw@mrwassoc.com>, "'Curtis Kebler (E-mail)'"
<curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com>, "Dean. Nistetter (E-mail)"
<Dean.Nistetter@dynegy.com>, "'Douglas Kerner (E-mail)'" <DKK@eslawfirm.com>,
"'Greg Blue (E-mail)'" <gtbl@dynegy.com>, "'Jan Smutny-Jones (E-mail)'"
<smutny@iepa.com>, "'Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)'" <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>,
"'Joe Ronan (E-mail)'" <joer@calpine.com>, "'John Larrea (E-mail)'"
<john.g.larrea@williams.com>, "'John Stout (E-mail)'"
<John_H_Stout@reliantenergy.com>, "'Julee Malinowski-Ball (E-mail)'"
<jmball@ns.net>, "'Kassandra Gough (E-mail)'" <kgough@calpine.com>, "'kent
Palmerton (E-mail)'" <kent.palmerton@williams.com>, "'Lynn Lednicky
(E-mail)'" <lale@dynegy.com>, "Marie Moretti (E-mail 2)"
<mmoretti@mccabeandcompany.net>, "'Marty Wilson (E-mail)'"
<mwilson@pstrategies.com>, "'McNally Ray (E-mail)'"
<rmcnally@mcnallytemple.com>, "''Nam Nguyen' (E-mail)'"
<nam.nguyen@powersrc.com>, "'Norton Kelli (E-mail)'"
<knorton@mcnallytemple.com>, "'Paula Hall-Collins (E-mail)'"
<paula.hall-collins@williams.com>, "'Pigott Jack (E-mail)'"
<jackp@calpine.com>, "'Richard Hyde (E-mail)'" <rwhyde@duke-energy.com>,
"'Roger Pelote (E-mail)'" <roger.pelote@williams.com>, "'Stephanie-Newell
(E-mail)'" <stephanie-newell@reliantenergy.com>, "'Sue Mara (E-mail)'"
<smara@enron.com>, "'Tom Ross (E-mail)'" <tross@mcnallytemple.com>, "Tom
Williams (E-mail)" <tcwillia@duke-energy.com>, "'Alex Sugaoka (E-mail)'"
<alex.sugaoka@uaecorp.com>, "'Bill Carlson (E-mail)'"
<william_carlson@wastemanagement.com>, "'Bill Woods (E-mail)'"
<billw@calpine.com>, "'Bob Ellery (E-mail)'" <bellery@spi-ind.com>, "'Bob
Gates (E-mail)'" <bob.gates@enron.com>, "'Cody Carter (E-mail)'"
<cody.carter@williams.com>, "'Curt Hatton (E-mail)'"
<Curt.Hatton@gen.pge.com>, "'David Parquet'" <david.parquet@enron.com>,
"'Dean Gosselin (E-mail)'" <dean_gosselin@fpl.com>, "'Doug Fernley (E-mail)'"
<fernley.doug@epenergy.com>, "'Duane Nelsen (E-mail)'"
<dnelsen@gwfpower.com>, "'Ed Tomeo (E-mail)'" <ed.tomeo@uaecorp.com>,
"'Eileen Koch (E-mail)'" <eileenk@calpine.com>, "'Eric Eisenman (E-mail)'"
<eric.eisenman@gen.pge.com>, "'Frank DeRosa (E-mail)'"
<frank.derosa@gen.pge.com>, "Frazier Blaylock (E-mail)"
<frazier_blaylock@ogden-energy.com>, "'Hap Boyd (E-mail)'"
<Hap_Boyd@enron.com>, "'Hawks Jack (E-mail)'" <jack.hawks@gen.pge.com>, "'Jim
Willey (E-mail)'" <elliottsa@earthlink.net>, "'Joe Greco (E-mail)'"
<jgreco@caithnessenergy.com>, "'Jonathan Weisgall (E-mail)'"
<jweisgall@aol.com>, "'Kate Castillo (E-mail)'" <CCastillo@riobravo-gm.com>,
"'Kelly Lloyd (E-mail)'" <kellyl@enxco.com>, "'Ken Hoffman (E-mail)'"
<khoffman@caithnessenergy.com>, "'Kent Fickett (E-mail)'"
<kfickett@usgen.com>, "'Lynn Lednicky (E-mail)'"
<lynn.a.lednicky@dynegy.com>, "'Marty McFadden (E-mail)'"
<marty_mcfadden@ogden-energy.com>, "'Paula Soos'"
<paula_soos@ogden-energy.com>, "'Randy Hickok (E-mail)'"
<rjhickok@duke-energy.com>, "Rick S. Koebbe (E-mail)"
<rskoebbe@powerworksinc.com>, "'Rob Lamkin (E-mail)'"
<rllamkin@seiworldwide.com>, "'Ross Ain (E-mail)'" <ain@worldnet.att.net>,
"'Steve Iliff'" <siliff@riobravo-gm.com>, "'Steve Ponder (E-mail)'"
<steve_ponder@fpl.com>, "'Tony Wetzel (E-mail)'" <twetzel@thermoecotek.com>,
"'William Hall (E-mail)'" <wfhall2@duke-energy.com>,
<trusso@mcnallytemple.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Initiative Campaign Strategy Outline

The following memo is for discussion during our Wednesday public affairs
committee meeting.
Thanks!  Jean

March 26, 2001

MEMORANDUM

To:    IEP
Fr:     Ray McNally, Richard Temple, Tony Russo, Jean Munoz, Tom Ross
Re:   Initiative Campaign Strategy Outline

Harvey Rosenfield has on numerous occasions threatened to place an initiative
on the 2002 ballot to re-regulate the power industry.

It is not a hollow threat.

Not only has Rosenfield successfully placed initiatives on the ballot in the
past, but the current energy crisis has become the number one issue on the
minds of voters dd making it easier to qualify a ballot measure.  And our own
internal polling for IEP shows voters would initially support the concept of
re-regulating the industry.

However, qualifying an initiative for next year?s election is not a foregone
conclusion.  And passing one is an even more difficult task.

Rosenfield faces several roadblocks:

o    The current energy issue is complicated, and all potential solutions
have weaknesses that could be exploited in a political campaign.

o    IEP?s internal polling shows Rosenfield?s proposal has weaknesses that
could be exploited dd including the price tag and the image of a state-run
energy department that could be compared to the DMV and CalTrans.

o    Rosenfield would have a difficult time funding a campaign, especially
raising the resources to overcome a strong, well funded "no" campaign.

o    The burden of "proof" always falls on the "yes" campaign rather than the
"no" campaign.  Voters are concerned about giving their approval to changes
that could make things worse.  Rosenfield will have to prove his case beyond
a shadow of a doubt, and therefore it is easier to defeat an initiative than
it is to pass one.

o    If power generators become motivated they can be a formidable opponent.

Following is (1) a preliminary timeline Rosenfield would face in trying to
qualify an initiative for the ballot in 2002, (2) strategic concepts that
should be considered before pursuing a plan to defeat the initiative, (3)
preliminary strategic and tactical options in opposing the initiative, and
(4) a discussion of campaign costs.

We recommend using this outline as a starting point to develop an effective
campaign plan that could successfully defeat Rosenfield if he pursues an
initiative strategy.

Timeline

To date, no proposed ballot initiative has been submitted to the Attorney
General for title and summary.  Accordingly, there is not sufficient time
available to qualify an initiative for the March 2002 ballot.

However, there is still adequate time to qualify a measure for the November
2002 ballot.  We believe Rosenfield could submit a measure to the Attorney
General as late as September, 2001 and still qualify the initiative for the
November 2002 ballot dd especially if the summer months produce power
blackouts, skyrocketing energy bills, and the image of a bungling Governor,
legislature and regulators.

The following timeline would allow Rosenfield to submit language for title
and summary as late as September 28, 2001 and qualify the initiative for the
November 2002 ballot:

September 28, 2001

Proposed measure is submitted to the AG for title and summary.

November 20, 2001

Attorney General prepares and issues title and summary.  Proponent can begin
circulating petitions.

April 19, 2002

The proponent files the petitions with county elections officials.

May 1, 2002

County elections officials complete petition raw count totals and certify raw
numbers to the Secretary of State.

June 23, 2002

County elections officials verify and certify results of the number of valid
signatures in their counties and turn in counts to the Secretary of State.

June 27, 2002

Secretary of State determines if the initiative qualifies for the ballot.
Proponent needs 670,816 valid signatures to qualify a constitutional
amendment or 419,260 valid signatures to qualify a straight statute.

Strategic Concepts

There are several strategic concepts that should be reviewed:

o    While satisfying Rosenfield may be impossible, IEP could push hard to
ensure a "solution" is passed by the legislature to give credibility to the
criticism that Rosenfield is an extremist whose initiative could undercut the
legislative remedy.

o    The industry could organize a well-funded campaign that contains an
early advertising blitz to quickly define the ballot measure in the most
negative manner possible, and that delivers a knock out punch in October.

o    Generators could promote a counter-initiative proposal, either through
the legislature or qualified by petition dd stopping Rosenfield?s proposal if
more "yes" votes are received for the counter initiative than the Rosenfield
measure.

o    Paid signature gathering firms could be put on contract for
industry-related business dd thus keeping these firms off the table for
Rosenfield.  Another variation would be to hire firms to gather signatures
calling for legislative action dd thus gaining names of voters who support
our position, but also keeping signature gatherers too busy to help
Rosenfileld.

o    The industry could pay to gather signatures on petitions that removes
names of people who may have signed the petition for Rosenfield?s
initiative.  This could cut down the number of valid signatures accepted by
county election officials.

o    A paid advertising campaign could be run during the proposal?s signature
gathering phase urging voters not to sign the petitions.  An added benefit of
the concept is defining the proposal early if it still qualifies for the
ballot.

o    We could organize a legal assault on the proposal dd stopping their
signature gathering efforts or keeping it off the ballot.

Campaign Strategy

If the proposal qualifies for the ballot, the industry must pursue an
aggressive strategy to defeat the measure.  We need to identify weaknesses in
the proposal and share those weaknesses with voters.  We must also push
voters to question the motives behind the initiative.  We need to make sure
voters are uncomfortable with all or portions of the initiative to ensure
they vote no despite wanting adequate and affordable energy.

The campaign should conduct thorough research to determine the best strategy
to defeat the measure.  Initially we believe the "no" campaign should focus
on testing and developing the following messages:

o    The measure will hurt taxpayers.  A $40 billion price tag is too much
for voters to accept as the only solution to the problem.

o    The proposal will hurt public services.  The cost of Rosenfield?s
measure will keep money away from more important programs  dd like schools,
public safety and programs for children and seniors.

o    The ballot measure is simply a way for elected officials to get more tax
dollars to cover up their failures dd and they should not be rewarded with
public support.

o    Rosenfield?s proposal will result in higher taxes to pay for more
bureaucracy and wasted tax dollars.

o    The proposal will result in more inefficient government that will
produce unreliable power dd hurting consumers, and vital services such as
hospitals and public safety.

o    The measure will hurt the economy and cost jobs at a time when the
economy is hurting.

Campaign Tactics

The campaign should follow an aggressive battleplan that includes the
following components:

Research

Focus groups and quantitative surveys should be conducted to help craft the
best messages to attack the proposal.  This research would also be important
in efforts to secure the most favorable ballot title and summary possible to
our goal of defeating it.

Demographic and election research should also be conducted to determine
voters most open to our campaign messages.  We should also conduct thorough
research on Rosenfield to expose his true motivations for proposing this
measure and its inherent weaknesses.

Legal, Title & Summary, and Ballot Argument Challenges

We should pursue every possible legal option to either get the proposal off
the ballot, or ensure the most favorable title & summary and weakened ballot
arguments for the initiative sponsors.  Our experience shows that the ballot
title and summary can swing initial vote margins either way by as much as 10
points.

Paid Advertising

Statewide campaigns in California require paid advertising dd including
electronic media, direct mail, and telemarketing.  Advertising should be
carefully targeted to ensure the most "bang for the buck."

Earned Media

Editorial support is an important part of successful statewide campaigns, as
is ensuring favorable media coverage of the campaign.  A focused earned media
campaign would greatly enhance the chances for success and editorial support
and Op-Ed?s can provide important third party credibility to the no campaign.

Coalition Building

It will be critical for the industry to gain credible allies in its fight
against Rosenfield.  We do not want the campaign to be portrayed as
generators versus consumer groups.  Therefore, we need credible, third party
groups standing along side us to broaden our appeal and message, like
taxpayer groups, business leaders, consumer organizations, energy experts,
economists, educators, law enforcement and seniors.

Campaign Costs

How much will be needed to defeat Rosenfield will depend on several factors.
Depending on several variables, the cost of a "no" campaign can range from a
few million dollars to as much as the $40 million spent to defeat Proposition
9.

Campaign costs to defeat ballot measures are contingent upon several
variables:

o    The popularity of the measure with voters.  The more they like it on the
natural, the more expensive it will be to defeat the measure.

o    How much money Rosenfield can raise to promote the measure.  If he has
few resources, the "no" campaign will have an uncontested paid advertising
campaign, which will make defeating the proposal much easier.

o    How bad the energy crisis impacts voters.  If the next 15 months produce
an on-going crisis, campaign costs will rise.

o    The effectiveness of messages against the proposal.  If focus group and
survey research confirm the proposal has an Achilles heel, the cost to defeat
the measure will go down dramatically.

Thorough research of Rosenfield?s actual proposal will better enable us to
recommend a campaign plan, message and budget.  In summary, defeating the
Rosenfield initiative will cost from a few to several million dollars and a
united industry effort.


Hi there. This came in while I was on the road.

Mac mentioned his girlfriend, but he didn't mention the Rice thing.  Hmmm.
We would love to have him at UH, since he won't aim any higher, and we thing
it beats SWTS.  He and his friend were wonderful house guests.

I hope no one got worse on your b day.  Many happy returns!

Love,

Kay

"Lisa Clarke" <lisa@casa-de-clarke.com> on 02/02/2001 08:51:47 AM
To: Kay Mann <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: <no subject>

Hi Kay! How are you guys doing? We had hoped that maybe we would be coming
over to Houston Saturday to see UT play baseball and then maybe try to see
yall Sunday before we drove back. BUT! As luck would have it, Annie, Katie
and Bobby are all various degrees of sick.

So, unless there is miraculous improvement in the next 24 hours, it looks
like we will be staying in Austin. Oh well. We hope to make another trip
down there before too long.

Well, I'm due at school, but I wanted to say hi and tell you that we won't
be coming down. I hear that Mac is coming down? That's great. I hope that he
likes what he sees at UH. You know his girlfriend has been offered a
scholarship to Rice, I think.

Anyway, Have a great Ground Hogs Day. It doesn't feel too different to be
40, rather than 39 and 364 days, so I guess I'll make it through the day.

Take care and tell everyone hello!

Love you!

Lisa


Vince,

I will take care of the few typos, capitalizations, etc., but I wanted to get
this to you asap.  He has a fine sense of humor!

Sam

---------------------- Forwarded by William Smith/Corp/Enron on 08/28/2000
12:12 PM ---------------------------
From: Giuseppe Paleologo@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS on 08/28/2000 12:11 PM
To: William Smith/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Hello!

I landed in the research group as a summer associate at the end of June,
straight from sunny Palo Alto, where I am pursuing a PhD in Management
Science and Engineering.  Since my area of research is the performance
evaluation and economic analysis of communication networks, Enron is "the"
place to be: Enron Broadband Services has the first mover's advantage in this
field, and nearly every decision requires an understanding of both data
networks and financial mathematics. Enron has  most of the needed skills to
succeed, and the right attitude. After two months here, I am more convinced
than ever that the best is still to come.
I am from Rome, Italy, where I have spent most of my life (my pre-columbian
period, properly speaking). Italy is the nation known among Americans  for
having invented the pasta alfredo and for having elected a porn star as a
member of parliament. The former allegation is indeed false: pasta alfredo is
quintessential american. About the latter, one of my dubious achievement is
to have interviewed the aforementioned member of parliament about her
political agenda, receiving predictably fuzzy answers.
As many members of the research groups, my background is in Physics. I fell
in love with Operation Research and Management Science while working for a
large IT consulting firm in Italy, and wanted to learn more. I have been a
student at Stanford University since then. Studying there has been a very
enjoyable experience, and I am sorry I will have to leave it sometime soon.
Management Science is not the only hobby in my life. I am an avid
motorcyclist, and am a lifelong student of argentine tango. I also like
reading (a skill I learned in 1st grade and has never failed me), in
particular 20th century english, italian and french poetry.

	William Smith@ENRON
	08/11/00 02:10 PM

		 To: Giuseppe Paleologo/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc:
		 Subject: Hello!

Giuseppe,

I'm Sam Smith and among other things I'm the department newsletter editor.
Are you going to be leaving after today or will you be around next week?  If
you'll be around, I'd love for you to write a short bio piece for the
newsletter.  Have a look at some recent issues for examples.  If you'll be
here Monday morning, I can get a quick photo.

If not, then I'm sorry I missed you!

Sam


I received an invoice from Corestaff for the day that Christina worked.  Do I need to do something with the invoice, or will she be paid automatically?


Attached is the weekly deal report covering 8/16/01-8/22/01.

Lex Carroll
Enron Power Marketing, Inc.
Midwest Region
713-853-5426


The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  ? 2001 Carr Futures

The charts are now available on the web by clicking on the hot link(s)
contained in this email. If for any reason you are unable to receive the
charts via the web, please contact me via email and I will email the charts
to you as attachments.

Crude     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/crude57.pdf
Natural Gas     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/ngas57.pdf
Distillate     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hoil57.pdf
Unleaded     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/unlded57.pdf

Feb. WTI/Brent Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/clg-qog.pdf
Feb Heat Crack     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/heatcrack.pdf
Feb Gas Crack     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/gascrack.pdf
Feb Gas/Heat Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hug-hog.pdf
June Gas/Heat Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/HUM-HOM.pdf
March Gas/Heat Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/HUH-HOH.pdf
Feb/May Unlead Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/HUG-HUK.pdf
Feb/July Crude oil Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/CLG-CLN.pdf

Nat Gas Strip Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/StripmatrixNG57.pdf
Nat Gas Spread Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SpreadmatrixNG57.pdf

Crude and Products Spread Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SpreadmatrixCL57.pdf

Scott Mollner Recommendation
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/recom12-20-01.pdf
Holiday Nat. Gas Options Play
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/XmasOptionsPlay.pdf

Daily Energy Letter
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/Energy-Letter12-20-01.pdf


>> You signed up to receive special offers at Colonize.com <<

Patrice,

Here's FREE help to reduce your debt and finance charges.

Immediately stop paying outrageous credit card finance charges and
get out of debt fast!

Click here!: http://www.colonize.com/c.php3?i=debtx5,10221,x1&e=28471412&aid=10221

Get help to:

o Slash your credit card interest rates down to zero
o Cut your minimum monthly payments by up to 50%
o Stop creditors from harassing you now
o Eliminate Late & Over Limit Fees
o Instantly consolidate your bills into one payment

Click here!: http://www.colonize.com/c.php3?i=debtx5,10221,x1&e=28471412&aid=10221

~~~~~~~~~~~
Questions? Comments? Email us at: info@colonize.com
You are currently subscribed as: pmims@enron.com
To unsubscribe visit:
http://www.colonize.com/u.php3?e=pmims@enron.com


Attached is the 2001 schedule for TeamGolf's International Golf Challenge a
2-man scramble event.  Please call 88-TEAMGOLF for more information or check
out our website at www.teamgolf.com.
 - Scramble promo. fax 2001.doc


Maricela,

EB 1962

Vince Kaminski

Thanks

Maricela Trevino on 01/19/2000 10:33:23 AM
To: Ed McMichael/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen Swain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hector
Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chad Pennix/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lee Jackson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrew
Kelemen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J
Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laura Wente/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stuart Schardin/LON/ECT@ECT,
Donald W Herrick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Allario/HOU/ECT@ECT, Katie Stowers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kyle Kettler/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Partho Ghosh/HOU/ECT@ECT, William Keeney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Erin
Norris/HOU/ECT@ECT, Roberto Martinez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gustavo
Junqueira/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fonny Bunjamin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Roger Persson/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Patricia Tlapek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stanton Ray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eva Rainer/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Edward Ondarza/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jay Epstein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jonathan
Schube/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christopher A Helfrich/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nicole
Palczer/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sarah
Goodpastor/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Daniel E
Arzola/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Leroy L
Ho/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Christiaan
Huizer/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Tom Huntington/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Jay Hawthorn/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Patrick Tucker/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Kara Knop/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Garrett Ashmore/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Julie Davidson/HOU/EES@EES, Lonnie
Farr/HOU/EES@EES, Lou Casari/HOU/EES@EES, Laurie Miller/HOU/EES@EES, Mark
Mixon/HOU/EES@EES, Michael Harris/Associate/HOU/EES@EES, Courtney
Votaw/HOU/EES@EES, Jun Wang/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Room Location

Good morning.  I had an individual attempt to deliver an invitation for you,
but he was told your location is incorrect.  Please send me your correct room
location.  Thank you.


I added 11/29-30 to deal 132030.  Give me a call if you have any questions.

D

Donald P Reinhardt
01/04/2000 04:51 PM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Stephanie Gomes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: C&E Operating, 11/99 production

Set out below is information regarding 660 MMBtu produced November 29 and 30
at meter 9813.  Please create a Sitara record for this production at your
earliest convenience.  The price is IF/HSC less $0.10.  The contract number
is 96016884.  A confirmation is not necessary.

Please call if I can be of any additional assistance.

Donald
x37008
---------------------- Forwarded by Donald P Reinhardt/HOU/ECT on 01/04/2000
04:45 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Stephanie Gomes                           01/04/2000 08:09 AM

To: Donald P Reinhardt/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: C&E Operating, 11/99 production

Donald, please see Julie's email below.  This is the deal that was not in the
system that I had asked you about.  Please let me know if there is something
else that I need to do.

Thanks, Stephanie ( 3-6004 )
---------------------- Forwarded by Stephanie Gomes/HOU/ECT on 01/04/2000
08:06 AM ---------------------------

Julie Meyers
01/03/2000 09:08 AM
To: Stephanie Gomes/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: C&E Operating, 11/99 production

I'm not sure if you got this resolved, but Donald will need to have someone
put a deal in, either a spot or has it been firmed up.

Julie

	From:  Stephanie Gomes                           12/28/99 08:45 AM

To: Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: C&E Operating, 11/99 production

Hi Julie, I have a question and I wasn't sure of who to start with.  I have a
new meter for C&E Operating, meter # 0989813 that started up Nov.29.  I have
a volume statement that confirms that volume did flow the 29th and 30th, a
total of 660mmbtu.  The problem is there is nothing in the system for meter #
9813 for 11/99 production.  I looked in Sitara,( sitara # 132030 ) and the
deal  starts for 12/99 production.   I checked with Donald to make sure and
he says that the meter did start up 11/29 and the price is HSC less $.10.  In
order to get this deal into the system, who do I need to talk to???

Thanks,  Stephanie ( 3-6004 )


Attached is a revised Credit Watch listing as of 4/02/01.
If there are any personnel in your group that were not included in this
distribution, please insure that they receive a copy of this report.
To add additional people to this distribution, or if this report has been
sent to you in error, please contact Veronica Espinoza at x6-6002.
For other questions, please contact Bill Bradford at x3-3831, Russell Diamond
at x5-7095, or Brant Reves at x3-9897.


I'll be unavailable--sorry.  DF

From:	Lillian Villarreal/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/06/2001 03:16 PM
To:	Julia White/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steve Hotte/ENRON@enronXgate, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kent Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Shelley Corman/ENRON@enronXgate, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jack Boatman/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Steve Gilbert/ENRON@enronxgate, Andy Brady/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Jeanne Licciardo/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mark Gigliotti/ENRON@enronXgate, Lisa Sawyer/ENRON@enronXgate, Linda Trevino/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rick Dietz/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, darryl.gebert@valtech.com@SMTP@enronXgate, michael.mccullough@valtech.com@SMTP@enronXgate, jim@jgg.net@SMTP@enronXgate, david.jayakaran@valtech.com@SMTP@enronXgate
cc:

Subject:	REVISED: Contracts Project - Executive Kickoff Mtg.

Please note that the Executive Kickoff meeting for the Contracts Project has been rescheduled to:
			Friday, March 16, 2001
			10 - 11 AM
			EB4102 & OMA 696
Please confirm your attendance (or regrets) via a REPLY to this message.

Thank you.


Complete Form 1 of performance reveiw and return to Morris.
Assigned to: CN=Jeff Arnold/OU=GCO/O=Enron
Updated by: CN=Jeff Arnold/OU=GCO/O=Enron


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 09/08/2000
05:04 PM ---------------------------

"Andreas Simou" <andreas@garpmail.com> on 09/06/2000 11:01:11 AM
To: <hansruedi.schuetter@csg.ch>
cc:
Subject: The GARP 2001 Convention

Dear GARP 2001 Speaker
?
Just a gentle reminder that the information I  requested for your
presentation at the GARP 2001 Convention,  was due in today. Can I please
have this information by Friday 8th  September so that I will have adequate
time to include all the details  in the brochure, which is due to go to press
very shortly.

The  information that I require as soon as possible is as follows:
1. confirmation of professional details (including  the speaker's name, job
title, and organisation)
2. confirmation that the topic title is accurate  and to your liking
3. bullet points for your presentation (up to 5 to  6 bullet points - please
as technical and detailed as possible)
4. contact details (including telephone numbers,  fax no, colleague/PA, full
address)
?
If you have any questions please do not hesitate to  contact me, otherwise I
look forward to receiving the above information by  Friday 8th September.
?
Kind regards
?
Andreas

____________________________
Andreas  Simou
GARP 2001 - Conference Producer
Tel? +44 (0) 20 7626  9301
Fax +44 (0) 20 7626 9900


Attached is a Draft Decision approving SDG&E's Emergency Motion for authority
to enter into bilateral contracts.

The decision directs to enter into bilateral agreements that will expire by
12/02.  It provides similar reasonableness guidance as provided to SCE
(bilateral contracts must be within 5% of actual annual procurement costs).

The draft decision rejects SDG&E's request to allocate those contracts to
residential and small commercial customers.  It rejects SDG&E's request for
an exemption from the affiliate rules, which would have allowed SDG&E to
enter into bilateral agreements with its trading affiliate without posting
those transactions or providing an opportunity for a bid process.

Because this decision adopts the same principles in the SCE and PG&E
Decisions, I give a low probability to changing the decision language.
However, if folks would still like us to weigh in on an issue, please let me
know asap.  Thanks.

Mona
---------------------- Forwarded by Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES on 08/28/2000
03:18 PM ---------------------------

"Daniel Douglass" <douglass@ArterHadden.com> on 08/25/2000 05:26:31 PM
To: <JBarthrop@electric.com>, <mnelson@electric.com>,
<rschlanert@electric.com>, <Bruno_Gaillard@enron.com>, <kmagrude@enron.com>,
<mpetroch@enron.com>, <susan_j_mara@enron.com>, <athomas@newenergy.com>,
<Jeff.Hanson@phaser.com>, <anchau@shellus.com>, <andrew.madden@utility.com>,
<ben.reyes@utility.com>, <chris.king@utility.com>, <david.bayless@utility.com>
cc:
Subject: Draft Decision Issued in SDG&E Emergency Motion

ALJ Cooke has issued the attached draft decision with regard to the August
9, 2000, emergency motion filed by SDG&E to enter into bilateral power
contracts.? SDG&E sought similar authority to that granted to Edison  and
PG&E in D.00-08-023.? The draft decision would grant the motion,  but would
impose certain conditions different from those requested by the  utility.?
The differences are summarized below:
?
Background
Under the terms of the  Commission,s D.00-08-021, SDG&E is currently
authorized to participate  in the PX forward markets for energy services,
subject to seasonal trading  limits, through the end of the last utility rate
freeze.? SDG&E is not  proposing an increase to the limits approved in
D.00-08-021 and will treat its  capacity purchases under those limits,
although it reserves the right to request  expanded authority in the future.?
The draft decision also notes that  SDG&E proposes that costs associated
with, and gains/losses from these  bilateral contracts should be attributed
only to small commercial and  residential customers.? It also notes that
intervenors focused on four  general areas of concern regarding the specific
authority requested by  SDG&E: duration of contracts, reasonableness
standards, request for  exemption from affiliate rules, and ratemaking.
?
Duration of  Contracts
SDG&E requested  authority to enter into bilateral contracts that expire on
or before December  31, 2005.? The ALJ notes that the Commission recently
instituted an  investigation into the impact of the functioning of the
wholesale electric  market on retail rates in SDG&E,s service territory and
that the OII  will consider whether SDG&E should be removed from that default
provider  role.? The ALJ states that, "the Commission should not compromise
future long-term solutions by affording SDG&E greater purchasing authority
than is needed to address the current emergency situation.? For this  reason,
we limit SDG&E,s authority to what we described in D.00-08-023  as near-term
bilateral contracting authority, that is, contracts with delivery  occurring
on or before December 31, 2002."
?
Reasonableness  Standards
The draft decision  suggests that the OII provides a forum to establish a
common framework for all  three utilities for determining the reasonableness
of their bilateral  purchases.? However, in the interim, it adopts the same
reasonableness  standard for near-term contracts as it did for SCE.? "If the
average  price of SDG&E,s bilateral transactions, delivered or requiring
delivery, over the course of an annual period exceeds the average price of
SDG&E,s corresponding portfolio of transactions, delivered or  requiring
deliver over the same period, by more than 5%, then the Commission  will
initiate a reasonableness review.? Reasonableness reviews, to the  extent
needed, will take place as part of SDG&E,s Annual Transition  Cost
Proceeding."
?
Affiliate Rules  Exemption
SDG&E's request to be  exempted from the affiliate rules for any purchases
from affiliates was  denied.
?
Ratemaking
TURN  urged the Commission to reject SDG&E,s request to limit the ratemaking
impacts of the bilateral contracts to its residential and small commercial
customers, saying that, "the potential risks and benefits should be spread
among all customers."? The draft decision states that, "we do not  believe it
prudent to limit the cost exposure for these contracts solely to  residential
and small commercial customers.? This aspect of  SDG&E,s motion is denied."
?
Transparency  Considerations
The ALJ orders SDG&E  to disclose all bilateral transactions to the Energy
Division on a confidential  basis in a monthly report.? The draft decision
notes that, "WPTF and  ARM argue that additional transparency of bilateral
transactions is required,  compared to that proposed by SDG&E.? We adopt
consistent disclosure  standards for SDG&E bilateral contracts as that
adopted in D.00-08-023 for  PG&E and SCE.? This issue may be revisited on a
going forward basis in  I.00-08-002."
?
Response Time
The normal response time  has been shortened.? Parties to the proceeding may
file comments on the  draft decision no later than noon on September 5,
2000.? I suggest that  comments be filed agreeing with the thrust of the
decision, but strongly  advocating that SDG&E be required to publicly post
its transactions, as it  agreed to do in Advice Letter 1234-E, with regard to
SDG&E's participation  in the Block Forward Market.? In addition, we should
consider whether to  refight the issue of limiting the ratemaking impacts of
the bilateral contracts  to SDG&E's residential and small commercial
customers.
?
Comments or  suggestions???
?
Dan

 - ALJ Cooke Draft Decision.doc


I'm putting the freezing one on my webpage with a few happy hour photo's as
soon as I get off my lazy butt.


Daren - Deal # 97929, meter 1450 expired Nov. '99.  Is there a way for you to
extend the deal or create a new one since there seems to be a little bit of
flow each month?

- Aimee

---------------------- Forwarded by Aimee Lannou/HOU/ECT on 02/03/2000 03:06
PM ---------------------------

Fred Boas
02/03/2000 02:02 PM
To: Aimee Lannou/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Bridgeback Error at Meter 1450 for 11/99

Aimee:

There is a bridgeback error at the above referenced meter and month.  The
reason for the error is that the deal, # 97929 has expired.  Please determine
if the deal was to be extended or is there another deal to replace it?

To fix this I will set up an accounting arrangement but what I need from you
is a valid deal number and the transportation contract that you want me to
put the deal on.

Thanks in advance for your help,

Fred


Let me know if she doesn't solve your problems.
---------------------- Forwarded by John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron on 07/07/2000
04:14 PM ---------------------------
Beth Perlman @ ECT   07/07/2000 08:29 AM

To: John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kristin
Albrecht/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Randy Matson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sally
Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Zhiyong Wei/HOU/ECT@ECT, Philippe A Bibi/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Power Port Calc Issues

John,

As of Wednesday, we have a resource from Sun Microsystems that is helping  us
isolate the problems we're having with the UNIX operating system and our
code.  This resource has requested that we bring on an additional application
specialist from SUN.  This has been authorized and the additional resource is
scheduled to be on site next week.  I also have my resources and the UNIX
administrators working along side the Sun resources.

As an aside, we are also experiencing performance problems with the gas side
of the business.  I met with Sally Beck's controllers yesterday and we are
putting a plan in place.  The increased trading volumes have seriously
impacted our through put and we now have a 'blitz' on to correct the issues.

These problems have not gone unnoticed.  I assure you that IT has been very
diligent in following through on these problems.  We're investing heavily in
additional hardware, bringing in contractors and hiring additional resources
at an average of 5 - 8 per week.  I will keep you posted as we continue to
enhance our existing systems.

Beth

	John J Lavorato@ENRON
	07/06/2000 07:46 PM

		 To: Beth Perlman/HOU/ECT@ECT, David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Power Port Calc Issues

Beth

Please respond with a plan to solve these problems.

Thanks John
---------------------- Forwarded by John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron on 07/06/2000
07:42 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Kevin M Presto @ ECT                           07/05/2000 07:39 PM

To: John Lavorato
cc: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kristin Albrecht/HOU/ECT@ECT, Beth
Perlman/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Power Port Calc Issues

Guys,
This Enpower calc issue is a joke.   How can we be the most Innovative
Company in the world and cannot fix a risk book calculation problem.
Furthermore, how can we effectively grow our volumes and complexity of our
power transactions when our back office (risk books, position management,
settlements) is so unreliable from an IT standpoint.

In addition, we will start losing all of our key people in this area because
they are here until 8:30-9:00 every night and 4:00 pm on "holidays".  This
whole issue is a significant business risk for Enron and needs to be dealt
with accordingly.

Please advise.  Thank you.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT on 07/05/2000
07:27 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kristin Albrecht                           07/05/2000 11:30 AM

To: Beth Perlman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Randy Matson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jarod
Jenson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christine Nguyen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Zhiyong Wei/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Ravi Ramachandran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey W White/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jenny
Latham/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jenny Rub/GPGFIN/Enron@Enron
cc: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tim
Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Power Port Calc Issues

The Power risk group continues to experience severe instability with the
power port calc.  The same memory allocation issue which I discussed in the
message below is not resolved (we have had this problem for about four months
now).  Due to business reasons, we calculated the east power books on Monday
(Enron holiday).  We received all of the required data to calc by 9:30 AM and
should have been completely done by 11:30.  However, the calc crashed six
times and finally completed on the seventh try.  We were able to leave by
4:00.  The point I am trying to make is that I feel that we are at such a
state that there is risk that we could not provide positions to the traders
by the start of the next business day.  This could have a financial impact on
our company.  Once again, I am urgently and desperately asking for resolution
of this problem.
Furthermore, it came to my attention on Friday that EES is now using EnPower
and the power port calc and they too are using the same server that we are.
I question this decision since we cannot seem to support the existing
business that is using that server.  Per discussion with Kevin Presto, the
agreement made regarding EES's use of EnPower was there would be no expense
or degradation to ENA's business process.  I think they need to move to
another server.
Please call to discuss when this will be resolved.  Thank You.
Kristin Albrecht
3-4763

---------------------- Forwarded by Kristin Albrecht/HOU/ECT on 07/05/2000
09:35 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kristin Albrecht                           05/15/2000 09:48 AM

To: Beth Perlman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Randy Matson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jarod
Jenson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christine Nguyen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Zhiyong Wei/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Ravi Ramachandran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey W White/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jenny
Latham/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: athena vs quark

With regards to the message below, we must have athena (server) to run our
nightly risk books for the power group.  We run one of our three east power
calcs on this machine (the second largest one).  Since an acceptable solution
for the big power calc has not been provided to us, athena CANNOT be taken
away from us.  The east power calc crashed 3 out of 5 days last week.  We
usually start calcing at about 4:00.  The calc time is now running at 1.5
hours and we have about 1.5 hours' worth of work after the calc's successful
completion.  So you do the math on what time my group leaves the building
when the calc crashes at 4:30.
Furthermore, the West power calc has crashed 3 out of 5 nights weekly for the
last 3 weeks.  This is not acceptable.
We are about to enter the busiest and most volatile time of the year and our
system is not stable.  I feel like we have been very patient at the expense
of many late nights.  I am going to speak to Kevin Presto and Tim Belden
today about these problems.
I think we need to meet immediately about this problem and I am exhausted
with the finger pointing between different IT groups.
Thanks.
Kristin Albrecht
---------------------- Forwarded by Kristin Albrecht/HOU/ECT on 05/15/2000
09:27 AM ---------------------------

Christine Nguyen
05/12/2000 01:01 PM
To: Ravi Ramachandran/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Randy Matson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: athena vs quark

Ravi,
       Please advise your users that athena will be completely unavailable
starting
Wednesday17May2000.  The production server is quark (12gb RAMx18procs).
quark is configured to our standard for your use.
Thanks,
-Christine


---------------------- Forwarded by Frank Hayden/Corp/Enron on 12/13/2000
07:37 AM ---------------------------

Peter Hattersley <phat@enrg.com> on 12/13/2000 07:22:07 AM
To:
cc:

Subject: Pete's Energy Tech

F Cl support at 2900, resistance at 3020
F/G Cl spread support at 25, pivot at 50, resistance at 75
F Ho support at 9450, resistance at 10000
F/G Ho spread support at 340, resiostance at 470
F Hu support at 7500, resistance at 7750
F/G Hu spread support at -90, resistance at -25
F Ng support at 690, pivot at 795, resistance at 900
F/G Ng spread support at 11, resistance at 30
For more see www.enrg.com


I have downloaded the new loss matrix. I have placed the spreadsheet  in  the
M: 24hour/ ERCOT(new!) folder called Fall ERCOT.
Thanks

	From:  Keller Mayeaux @ ECT                           09/23/2000 07:24 AM

To: Jay Wills/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cyril Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Kinser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rudy Acevedo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Hrabal/HOU/ECT@ect,
Wayne Herndon/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Juan Hernandez/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Greg
Trefz/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Miguel Garcia/NA/Enron@ENRON, Russell
Ballato/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe Stepenovitch/Corp/Enron@Enron, Joe
Errigo/Corp/Enron@Enron, Doug Miller/Corp/Enron@Enron, Larry F
Campbell/NA/Enron@Enron, Keller Mayeaux/Corp/Enron@Enron, Chad
Starnes/Corp/Enron@Enron, Dean Laurent/HOU/ECT@ECT, Don Baughman/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Lawrence Clayton/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Ercot Losses

Use the new loss matrices located in Ercot Iso home page.I or someone will
have to go back and look at the losses from Sept.1 till Sept.20 becouse I
think we were using summers losses.FALL IS SIGNIFICANTLY LOWER EFFECTIVE SEPT
1.


Guys:  currently the system is designed to match upstreams and downstreams
for buy/sells in contract exchange, and the scheduler would then recreate
these paths in Unify.  In my opinion this does not guarantee data integrity
between the systems.  Carrie and I have scheduled a meeting for 1:30 pm today
in 21c2 to discuss.  Please feel free to attend and give your opinions.
---------------------- Forwarded by Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT on 10/17/2000 06:35
AM ---------------------------

Carrie Slagle
10/16/2000 05:11 PM
To: Lisa Kinsey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey J Brewer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tricia
Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eddie Janzen/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Molly Sumrow/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: "Auto-Pathing" Buy/Sells

Hello!

Randy and I were discussing some additional functionality after the meeting
today. . .

Is there any reason that we could NOT automate the creation of the buy/sell
or brokered paths in UNIFY once the deals have been matched in the Contract
Exchange module?  Will the Contract Exchange module contain enough
information to create the UNIFY path just a scheduler would?

In other words, is the path creation process for buy/sell deals only manual
"re-entry" of the data that will be sitting out in Contract Exchange?  OR is
there additional information that you need to create the path that is not
sitting in Contract Exchange?

This, of course, assumes that the meter has been added to the deal in
Contract Exchange and the deal has bridged from SITARA to UNIFY.

It seems to us that this should be possible and valuable, but please give us
your input!

Thanks,
Carrie


These dates and times are confirmed.  Please let me know if you have any
additional questions.  Thanks!
Ben Rogers


-----Original Message-----
From: Jason.Cain@reliant.com [mailto:Jason.Cain@reliant.com]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 10:46 AM
To: Brian_Cain@fws.gov; jlcain%medicine@tamu.edu; madc66@yahoo.com;
Mark_Clifton@Dell.com; Hendon, Brian; jpolasek@etgi.cc;
mike_reddell@hotmail.com; fredz@orillion.com
Subject: The History of Aggie Civilization - THIS IS GOOD!!

THE HISTORY OF AGGIE CIVILIZATION

The history of the aggie people is as confusing and complex as any culture
that exists on earth. Yet, unlike many peoples that have adapted and
evolved in response to external and internal influences over the centuries,
the aggies have largely remained true to their roots. And they're proud of
it. As a result of passing on their beliefs and practices over the years,
their behavior over time has been remarkably consistent. It is this
consistency that makes them an exciting and fascinating group to study.

Who are the aggies? The relationship between the aggies and morons, idiots,
and okies are often misunderstood. Contrary to widespread belief, the
aggies are considered, and consider themselves, a separate people from the
morons, idiots, and okies. Historically, the true stupidity of aggies has
largely dominated over, and outnumbered all three other groups combined.
The misconception that the four groups are related probably stems from the
fact that morons and idiots have imitated many rituals and behaviors
practiced by the aggies. However, aggies are a distinct group. [Although
recent evidence (Solomon, Shyster, et. al?1995) suggests that at one time,
probably early in the century, aggies and okies lived together and
interbred in parts of Southern Oklahoma and Texas, hence, Arkansas was
populated by their offspring.

What largely separates aggies from the others groups is their social
interaction. Unlike okies, idiots, and morons, aggies are highly social
creatures that tend to validate each other's views and beliefs. This can
lead to what scholars call a "groupthink delusion." It is believed that
these delusions are the glue that have bound aggies everywhere together
over the years.

The history of the aggie school of thought actually begins in ancient
Greece, with the early philospher Slocumedes, who was the first to
recognize that the absence of everything is equivalent to nothing. He had a
large number of stupid followers and much of his works is still passed on
from parent to child today. Stupicles, from Pheces, taught that all things
could be crushed by a large enough piece of wood. His students, known as
woodpeckers, practiced pet embalming, hand gestures, organized grunting and
mastered many techniques in consuming solid food through their nasal
cavities. Stupicles was also a prolific writer. Unfortunately, his twelve
volumes of philosophical works, which he wrote entirely in the sand on an
Egyptian beach, was lost during a high Mediterranean tide.

With the rise of the Roman Empire, many aggies sought the stability and
steady work afforded by slavery. The aggies however, made poor slaves, and
many were forced into Christianity for "entertainment of monks" and so that
they could be fed to the lions. Others were driven out of the Roman Empire
into Northern Europe where they settled many colonies. The void left by the
fall of the Roman Empire provided the aggies an opportunity to flourish
unhindered in Europe, hence Poland and France were populated.

The aggies didn't fare so well during the industrial revolution since the
philosophical and scientific frameworks of Descartes and Newton didn't give
much leeway to superstition and planned ignorance. More and more aggies
found themselves falling into the ranks of the working masses. Aggies
caused many early industrial accidents as they tried to fit into this
rapidly changing society, and evidence of their engineering prowess
remains, such as the Leaning Tower of Pisa. Their ways and practices were
not appreciated in the new European culture; however, and increasingly many
aggies sought refuge across the ocean in America. That is those who didn't
wind up sinking their ships in the North Atlantic.

Part of the problem in identifying an aggie is that they look and act much
like anyone else until they do or say something decidedly stupid. Most
aggies don't think of themselves as morons, but rather as intelligent
individuals. This makes it very difficult to reason with an aggie. Stupid
acts can take many forms and vary in degree, but when an aggie commits one
it is unmistakable. The majority of the times a aggie turns out to be
nothing more than an inconvenience and source of humor to the innocent
bystander. These incidents are played out on city streets, supermarkets and
country Dairy Queens daily. However, there are times when these acts can
get out of hand and be devastating. It is always wise to be on alert and
prepared, and stay away from large stacks of logs, maroon-clad men wielding
binoculars, or people with shaved heads with swords.

At times you may find yourself in close proximity to an aggie in the midst
of a stupid spell. It is good advice not to approach them during an
incident unless accompanied by a trained professional. If you find that you
have no choice, then speak slowly and use small, soothing words. Never try
to outwit an aggie since they will only interpret that as a hostile and
aggressive act. Always let the aggie think they are superior. And under no
circumstances let your face or hands, pets or livestock near aggies mouth.

Keep in mind at all times, that although an aggie may seem intelligent and
civilized, they are not. It is an adaptive disguise developed over the
centuries.

Beware, be safe, and be orange!

Hook'em!


We are pleased to present you with a 2001 Special Stock Option Grant Award.  As a participant in this grant you have the opportunity to share in the ownership of Enron and the potential profit from increases in the value of Enron's common stock.

The 2001 Special Stock Option Grant was made to let you know how valuable you are and to recognize your contributions in making Enron the great company it is today.   Although there are no guarantees as to Enron's future stock performance, we believe that an Enron stock option has tremendous future growth potential.  The value you ultimately receive from your options will depend on the price of Enron stock at the time you exercise your options.

You can access your 2001 Special Stock Option Grant Agreement and the Stock Plan document governing the grant via your eHRonline account on the intranet website at http://ehronline.enron.com.  Unlike stock options granted in the past a copy of your grant agreement will not be mailed to your home address.

Additionally, the following information regarding the 2001 Special Stock Option Grant can be found on the HR website http://hrweb.enron.com.

?	2001 Special Stock Option Grant Highlights
?	2001 Special Stock Option Grant Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
?	A "How to Exercise Options" document that contains contact information and PaineWebber forms applicable to your stock options

Please take time to review this material.  It is important to us and to you.  If you have any questions, please contact your Human Resources representative.


18 INSIDE FERC-August 13, 2001
?2001 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Reproduction forbidden without permission.
BLAMING EACH OTHER, EL PASO SHIPPERS CALL FOR ALLOCATION OVERHAUL
Contract demand shippers last week argued anew that insufficient physical capacity exists on the El
Paso Natural Gas Co. system and that full-requirement shippers often are to blame for system disruptions
on peak days. In comments, various El Paso shippers called on FERC to address their concerns and many
suggested that the commission should pull together separate but related El Paso proceedings.

For its part, El Paso rebutted a July 17 complaint (RP01-486) by a group of mostly full-requirements
shippers located east of California. The EOC shippers alleged that El Paso was neglecting its responsibili-ties
to existing shippers while concentrating on drumming up new business without needed system
upgrades or expansions. The shipper group claimed that a 10-year rate freeze running through 2005 gives
El Paso no incentive to improve its system to maintain service quality (IF, 23 July, 3).

The complaint "is without foundation in fact, law or policy," El Paso insisted in an Aug. 6 answer. The
pipeline "has consistently maintained" facilities or built new capacity "whenever it has been economically
justifiable" under the 1995 settlement. In the meantime, a large and unexpected increase in full-require-ments
load has triggered use of a capacity-allocation scheme, which also was agreed to by parties in the
settlement, El Paso told FERC.

Frustration with the capacity-allocation methodology was expressed by CD shippers in response to the
complaint. In representative comments, the Indicated Shippers agreed with the EOC shippers that a
"chronic" shortage of capacity exists on El Paso but did not accept the EOC group's version of events that
led to the problem or its proposed solution. The EOC group asked FERC to direct El Paso to add facilities
and dedicate all of the 230,000 Mcf/day of capacity from an ongoing conversion project to existing firm
contractual obligations.

The Indicated Shippers derided the term "existing firm obligations" as vague enough to cover
new power plants and referred to the controversy surrounding El Paso's Redhawk project, which FERC
recently agreed can be built under automatic blanket authorization to serve two power plants in
Maricopa County, Ariz. To bring certainty to the El Paso system, all shipper rights must be better
defined, the Indicated Shippers demanded in calling for all full-requirements contracts to be converted
to contract demand contracts, echoing a similar assertion made in a July 13 complaint by a group of
CD shippers (RP01-484).

Otherwise, full-requirements shippers will enjoy unlimited use of capacity at the expense of other
customers, the Indicated Shippers continued. "The absurdity of the claim is demonstrated by analogy to a
request that an airplane be built to carry all customers who might request service on a particular day,
without requiring the customers to make a reservation," they said.

The "entire ability" of El Paso to handle increased volumes systemwide was questioned earlier this
summer by Commissioner Pat Wood III in a June 27 discussion prior to the Redhawk vote (IF, 2 July, 4). El
Paso was directed to relate in its order 637 proceeding (RP00-336) how well upstream capacity can handle
new load on the system. El Paso committed in a July 9 letter to serve full-requirements customers "while
satisfying" obligations to California customers.

On days of short supply, shippers using primary points are scheduled ahead of those using alternate
points and interruptible shippers, El Paso went on to say. If firm shippers using primary points exceed
available capacity, then volumes are allocated on a pro-rata basis. El Paso also reiterated its plans to use
the capacity from the conversion of the All American Pipeline L.P. to serve existing customers.

Beyond requesting the information in the order 637 proceeding, FERC should take another step to
consider "the totality of circumstances on the El Paso system" and reopen the pipeline's rates under section
5 of the Natural Gas Act, Southern California Edison Co. asserted. The increased load by full-requirements
shippers caused problems in flowing contracted quantities on El Paso, SoCal Ed contended.

Full-requirements and contract demand shippers pay for service differently, SoCal Ed continued. While
CD shippers pay demand charges for all their volumes, full-requirements shippers pay charges based on
total billing determinants of 766,659 Dt/day. When FR customers use more than that, El Paso is unable to
honor firm commitments and the customers "enjoy a free ride at the expense of California consumers," the.utility complained.

Oneok Energy Marketing and Trading Co. L.P. registered a similar concern, contending that the pro-rata
allocation methodology favors FR customers. "Full-requirements shippers can game the system by
nominating volumes far in excess of their actual needs, and thus receive disproportionate volumes in the
pro-rata allocation scheme" that El Paso uses, Oneok said.

Given that the related complaints deal with the same issue, Pacific Gas and Electric Co., Enron Corp.
and El Paso asked FERC to consolidate the cases. The cases should be addressed in one hearing where
"numerous allegations of contested fact" could be investigated, El Paso submitted.

But neither shipper group is right, the pipeline maintained. It insisted that it adheres to the letter of its
contracts, tariff and two settlements to meet obligations to customers. Because unanticipated growth in
full-requirements demand has caused use of the capacity allocation procedures, El Paso would like to
establish a new systemwide allocation methodology in the order 637 proceeding, it told FERC.

"In anticipation that this escalating usage under the FR contracts will come under commission
scrutiny, the [EOC] shippers apparently chose to make a pre-emptive strike," El Paso said. FERC
should consider whether there is a "reasonably proportionate limitation implied" in El Paso's FR
contracts, the pipeline continued. Full-requirements shippers cannot demand more and more volumes
without paying for it, El Paso held.

"It is ludicrous for the [EOC] shippers to suggest that it is economically justifiable for [El Paso] to
construct expensive mainline facilities, costing hundreds of millions of dollars, to serve ever-increasing FR
loads at [EL Paso's] commodity rates," El Paso argued.

Besides, the commission has no authority to force a pipeline to expand under the circumstances at
hand, El Paso continued. Under NGA section 7(a), FERC's ability to order a physical connection to a
pipeline is limited to service for local distribution, El Paso noted. Any decision about other pipeline
facilities must be left to stockholders and directors of the companies, it concluded.


Robert, let's deliver 1,000 day to Cove Point off CGAS for May.  That should
give us 812 day injected for May.

This may change after I chat with Laura at Cove Point.  I knew we could
deliver 4,000 day for April but she never told me what we could do for May.


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 12/27/99 11:21
AM ---------------------------

pdrexel@columbiaenergygroup.com on 12/27/99 08:03:39 AM
To: Dan Junek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RG&E 2000 Noms

---------------------- Forwarded by Paul Drexelius/CES/ColumbiaGas on 12/27/99
08:10 AM ---------------------------

Heidi Boyd
12/27/99 07:25 AM

To: Morgan Sharifi/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
cc: Noel Bartlo/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Paul
Drexelius/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Marianne
Stiles/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
Subject: RG&E 2000 Noms

Hi Morgan, Noel, and Paul,

I just received my daily volume for Jan 2000 from RG&E.  That number is a CNG
requirement of 83 dth's/day.

Thanks and will be sending you more soon.


I never heard back from you.  You were going to look at my list of approved
jurisdictions and see if you disagreed with any of my information.  I'll be
out the rest of the week, but maybe when I get back we can chat again on the
phone, and maybe pull Edmund in, because before Edmund got sick, we were
pretty much in agreement on how he was supposed to respond about Americas
countries and how I should respond about European countries.


thanks mike. BT

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Etringer, Michael
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 9:42 AM
To:	Tycholiz, Barry
Subject:	RE: QF payments

There may be a handful of small QFs which have not returned but I would say the a majority of the QFs are back on line and are being paid for what they generate on a go forward basis.  Right now the SCE QFs are negotiating with SCE on 2 major points:  when will they be paid for the outstanding receivables (est. at $1.3 B for SCE and about $1.0 B for PG&E)  and when will the 5 yr fixed price SRAC of 5.37 cents/kw apply for those that have selected this option.  Right now SCE appears to be indicating that they will be paying the receivable sometime around June/July of 2002 and that the 5.37 price would apply at that time or as much as 4 months after that.  The logic is that they are trying to indicate that the MOU, if it had been passed, would not have applied at least until that time.

M
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tycholiz, Barry
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 6:58 AM
To:	Etringer, Michael
Subject:	QF payments

Mike, have the QF's been paid for the power they were selling to the utilities.  I have not heard much about that and was wondering if these payments were all part of the Bond issue.? Are the QF's generating power today?

BT


Michelle,

Per our conversation, attached is a draft of an amendment to the Master Firm
Purchase/Sale Agreement between IDACORP Energy Solutions, Inc. and Enron
North America Corp.  which changes the confirming party to ENA.

Please call me at (713) 853-5705 or e-mail me with your comments.

Stacy Dickson


Hey guys,

I pulled these email addresses of my contact list and have no idea if any of
them are still valid.  I just wanted to let you all know I have a new email
address (david_r_peterson@yahoo.com).

Hope everything's going well.  I have to keep this short, since I have
another 50 emails to write.  Give me a call if you're ever up Dallas way
(214) 403-7229.

Dave.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Diamond, Daniel
Sent:	Wednesday, January 30, 2002 2:58 PM
To:	DL-NETCO Gas Traders; DL-NETCO Power Traders
Cc:	Forster, David; Mandola, Teresa; Mcquade, Jennifer
Subject:	**IMPORTANT** Stack Manager Users
Importance:	High

We are in the process of confirming that all traders are set up correctly and ready to trade when the system goes live.

We need to make sure that your Stack Managers are accessing the correct database. In order to do this, we need to know how you access Stack Manager:

1) Through Terminal Server (the one that opens up a desktop within a desktop and it actually appears that you have two Start buttons).
or
2) By opening the Stack Manager directly from your "native" desktop.

Please reply to this message with either a corresponding "1" or a "2" in the subject field.

If you're not sure which one you have, please contact myself x39673, Teresa Mandola x39807 or Jennifer McQuade x53614 and we'll come by your desk to help you.

Thank you,

Dan Diamond


Forwarded as requested in yesterday's meeting.  Please advise when action should be taken as to response.  I've worked with the underlying contract.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Dan Kuehn" <Dan.Kuehn@lcra.org>@ENRON
Sent:	Friday, November 30, 2001 12:04 PM
To:	Curry, Mike
Cc:	Portz, David; Gilbert-smith, Doug; Dudley Piland; Richard Ramirez; Shams Siddiqi; Steve Burger
Subject:	Re: Notice of Termination - Power Purchase and Sale Agreement

A signed copy of the attached Notice of Termination is being  faxed and sent via certified mail today.

Best Regards,

Dan


Chris:

My comments are as follows, and I'd like you to send a letter rather than an
e-mail:

Dear Jeff,

As a follow up  to your letter dated May 9, 2001, upon the posting of an LC
in the amount of $965,855 representing 5% of the price of unit 1, we are
prepared to pay GE the $1,501,885 deducted from our last payment. With
respect to liquidated damages on delivery of the air filter, we reserve our
rights under the contract to exercise our offset rights at a later date.

Please let me know when you will be able to have the LC in place, and we will
make appropriate payment arrangements.

Regards,

Chris Booth
Manager

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Chris Booth @ ENRON                           05/18/2001 02:39 PM

To: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: GE payments

Kay and Ben,

I would like to send the following to Jeff Darst at GE via e-mail.

Dear Jeff,

Pursuant to you letter dated May 9, 2001 we are prepared to pay the deduct
for liquidated damages ($536,000) and retention deduct ($965,885) withheld
from the April 25, 2001 invoice.  Payment of the deduct for the liquidated
damages claim does not constitute a withdrawal of the claim, hence, we are
not waiving our rights afforded under the contract.  As stated in our letter
dated May 3, 2001, we are prepared to pay the final 5% payment for Unit 1
upon receipt of the Letter of Credit for $965,855 (5% of the price for Unit
1) and a lien release.

Regards,

Chris


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT on 06/12/2000
10:55 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Tim Belden                           06/11/2000 07:26 PM

To: Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Thoughts on Presentation

It is a shame that the CAISO doesn't provide actual generation by unit.  The
WSCC data, which is dicey and we don't have until July 1999, and the CEMMS,
which comes on a delay, are ultimately our best sources.  For your purposes
the CAISO may suffice.  I think that you probably know this already, but
there can be a siginificant difference between "scheduled" and "actual"
generation.  You are pulling "scheduled."  If someone doesn't schedule their
generation and then generates, either instructed or uninstructed, then you
will miss that.  You may also miss generation of the northern california
munis such as smud who only schedule their net load to the caiso.  That is,
if they have 1500 MW of load and 1200 MW of generation, they may simply
schedule 300 MW of load and sc transfers or imports of 300 MW.  Having said
all of that, it is probably close enough and better than your alternatives on
the generation side.

On the load side I think that I would simply use CAISO actual load.  While
they don't split out NP15 from SP15, I think that using the actual number is
better than the "scheduled" number.  The utilities play lots of game on the
load side, usually under-scheduling depending on price.

I think the presentation looks good.  It would be useful to share this with
others up here once you have it finished.  I'd like to see how much gas
demand goes up with each additional GW of gas-generated electricity,
especially compared to all gas consumption.  I was surprised by how small the
UEG consumption was compared to other uses.  If it is the largest marginal
consumer then it is obviously a different story.

Let's talk.