Raymond,

Thank you for your note.  It would be great if you could be ready to roll-out
Korean Weather in the near future.   It would be tough to sell Weather
Derivatives in Korea, but the early move can be positive for us especially
because K-Weather, a local weather forecasting company, is also studying
Weather Derivatives for potential launch.  Regarding the questions you asked,
please find below my answers in blue.  Thanks.

Regards,
Jae-Moo

Raymond Yeow@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
08/25/2000 04:58 PM
To: Matthias Lee/SIN/ECT@ECT@ENRON
cc: Jae-Moo Lee/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Christopher B
Hunt/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Joseph P Hirl/AP/ENRON@ENRON, David
Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron, John Ambler/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Mike Dahlke/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Bruce
Lundstrom/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Alan
Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT@ENRON, Mike Brown/ENRON@Gateway@ENRON, Justin
Timothy/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Paul Quilkey/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John
Viverito/Corp/Enron@Enron, Rousseau Anai/AP/Enron@Enron, John
Chismar/SIN/ECT@ECT@ENRON, Victor Santos/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Li Yin Lim/SIN/ECT@ECT@ENRON, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT@ENRON, David
Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jonathan Whitehead/AP/Enron@Enron, Michelle
Lee/Corp/Enron@Enron, Ann Brown/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Matthias
Lee/SIN/ECT@ECT@ENRON, Angeline Poon/SIN/ECT@ECT@ENRON, Paul
Smith/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Christian Werner/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Allan
Ford/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Comments & questions re: EOL Korea

To Jae- Moo,
1. Impressive P'point presentation indeed.

2. Friday Sep 1 - 800am TYO time is good for Australia, I will be attending
is there anything that i need to arrange at our end ??

3. After the successful roll-out of W for Japan & Oz thus qtr,
as discussed - we are ready to roll-out Korean W say in Mid October ???
Your email & presenatation thus arrived at a very good time.

4. Just some questions -
You may answer in the conference call or by email -- your choice

(a) why has W derivatives been singled out by FSC for potential review
when there is no regulation of eg LPG , or plastics swaps & fwds  ?  (pg 11
of presentation)

We are just talking about the theoretical possibility of FSC's (Financial
Supervisory Commission) review of Weather Derivatives because of the novelty
in Korea although, according to the Kim & Chang report, there are currently
no laws or regulations in Korea that regulate marketing of OTC derivative
transactions through the internet or otherwise.  When we talked to FSC a
couple of months ago, they confirmed that there is no law or regulation
restricting Weather Derivatives in Korea.  FSC did not indicate any intention
to review Weather Derivatives for regulation, either.   In addition,
according to the Kim & Chang report, Weather Derivatives would not be
considered to be an insurance contract subject to Korean insurance
regulations.  Kim & Chang also believes that Weather Derivatives should not
be considered gambling or wagering but a legitimate method of hedging risks
relating to weather.

(b) How necessary are the meetings with ( pg 5 of presentation)
".. Bank of Korea (BOK)/ Ministry of Finance & Economy (MOFE) for
classification of weather derivatives as commodity derivatives.." ?
Is this meeting to meet
"...except for Foreign Exchange Transaction Regulations (FETR) in case of
foreign currency trades
? Classification of weather derivatives as commodity or financial derivatives
under FETR needs to be resolved..."(pg 15 of presentation)

Can we just do it first with Enron Korea as the counterparty ? If so , if
Korean coy transacts with Enron Korea,
there should be no problem in remitting funds wholly within Korea !
Also we intend to offer product in Won only so no FX involved at all .

According to the Kim & Chang report,   FETR is the only regulation that
regulates OTC derivative transactions, and FETR is applicable only when FX is
involved in a transaction or when a transaction is between a Korean resident
and a non-resident.  Thus, as far as we understand based on the Kim & Chang
report and conversations with FSC and other local lawyers, if a transaction
(Weather derivative or other commodity derivative) is between residents in
Korea (e.g., a Korean customer and Enron Korea) in Korean currency (Won),
neither FETR nor any other regulations are applicable.  No report or approval
would be required.

(c)
pg 18 of presentation
'...All other EnronOnline products with the exception of bandwidth and
emission allowances are classified as commodity derivatives in Korea..."
Why is it bandwidth and emission are classified differently?
Will not Weather fall under same category ?

There is no classification or definition of bandwidth, emission or weather
derivative products in Korea since Korea has no experience in such products
or concepts.  Please refer to my previous e-mail to Matt for definitions of
derivative transactions (commodity and financial).

"...Commodity derivatives require a prior reporting to the Bank of Korea for
each trade .."
Is this only relevant if product is not in Won but foreign currency ?

The reporting requirement is relevant under the FETR only which is applied
for a transaction with FX involved or between a resident and non-resident in
Korea.

5. pg 28 of presentation
Note that Dr Christian Werner - Sydney office will be the person for
"Data system   For weather derivative products, arrange with a weather
forecasting company for the weather data feed - timing depends on the
location"

We will provide relevant information for Christian.

We will be able to assist with (if reqd, see points 4b & c above)  Thanks. It
would be necessary only when we decide to deal with FETR.
"...  For weather derivatives, arrange presentation meetings with BOK/MOFE
for classification of weather derivatives as commodity derivatives
_ May require longer time for their decision making
Korea Office, Mike Dahlke, EOL Weather specialist (?)"

Best wishes
Raymond

Matthias Lee@ECT
08/24/2000 09:22 PM
To: Jae-Moo Lee/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Christopher B Hunt/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON, Joseph P
Hirl/AP/ENRON@ENRON, David Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron, John
Ambler/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON, Mike
Dahlke/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON, Bruce
Lundstrom/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON, Alan
Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Brown/ENRON@Gateway@ENRON, Justin
Timothy/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON, Paul
Quilkey/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON, Raymond
Yeow/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON, John
Viverito/Corp/Enron@Enron, Rousseau Anai/AP/Enron@Enron, John
Chismar/SIN/ECT@ECT, Victor Santos/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON,
Li Yin Lim/SIN/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON, Jonathan
Whitehead/AP/Enron@Enron, Michelle Lee/Corp/Enron@Enron, Ann
Brown/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON, Matthias Lee/SIN/ECT@ECT,
Angeline Poon/SIN/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: EOL Korea

Jae-Moo

On the section of Regulatory/Legal Environment, it may be useful to note:

1. There is no official rule or regulation that ex post facto reporting for
Commodity Derivatives are acceptable to the Bank of Korea, although your and
Korean external lawyer's (Kim & Chang) informal verbal enquiries with the
Bank of Korea have suggested they have accepted some  7 or 8 reports since
April last year (all from Hyundai Oil).

2. The Bank of Korea take up to two weeks to review the reports and, as Kim &
Chang has advised, there remains a possibility that the Bank of Korea may
reject the report, although they were not able to advise the grounds on which
a report may be rejected.

3. Although, a foreign counterparty need not file a report or seek approval,
the Korean counterparty must still do so for the benefit and interest of the
foreign counterparty. Kim & Chang advised that where reporting or approval is
required but is not made or obtained, the Korean counterparty would not be
able to remit its payments under the transaction. This would clearly impact
on the settlement of the transaction, in particular shorter term deals since
reporting and approval may take several weeks.

4. The Supreme Court of Korea has ruled that a foreign exchange authorization
that was originally required should be obtained in order for a foreign party
to execute any judgment against the Korean party and remit the proceeds.

Regards
Matt

Jae-Moo Lee@ENRON
08/24/2000 04:58 PM
To: Christopher B Hunt/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Joseph P
Hirl/AP/ENRON@ENRON, David Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron, John
Ambler/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mike
Dahlke/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Bruce
Lundstrom/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mike Brown/ENRON@Gateway, Justin Timothy/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Paul Quilkey/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Raymond
Yeow/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John Viverito/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Rousseau Anai/AP/Enron@Enron, John Chismar/SIN/ECT@ECT, Victor
Santos/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Li Yin Lim/SIN/ECT@ECT, Mark
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matthias Lee/SIN/ECT@ECT, David
Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jonathan Whitehead/AP/Enron@Enron
cc: Michelle Lee/Corp/Enron@Enron, Ann
Brown/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: EOL Korea

As many of you are aware, over the past few months we have been investigating
whether or not it would make sense to seriously consider an EOL launch in
Korea from a market, regulatory and legal perspective.  The primary interest
has been on reviewing whether or not we could launch existing products in
Korea (e.g., products already handled by Singapore EOL) as well as new
products (e.g., Seoul weather).

This initial work was directed primarily by the Korea team working within the
APACHI group.  If a launch is to progress much further from this point,
however, substantial attention by the EOL team would be required.  To
facilitate this, the attached presentation summarizes our primary findings to
date and some of our thoughts.  We would appreciate your taking a look at the
attached document.

We would like to arrange a conference call for next Thursday (Aug. 31st) at
6:00 pm by Houston time (Friday at 8:00 am by Tokyo time) to discuss the
attached document and to solicit thoughts as to next steps.  Please let me
know whether you will be able to join this call or, if you have a conflict,
an alternative time.  Your participation will be greatly appreciated.

Best regards,

Jae-Moo


fyi

Sue Nord, Sr. Director
Government Affairs
713 345-4196

----- Forwarded by Sue Nord/NA/Enron on 07/12/2001 08:55 AM -----

	Mona L Petrochko
	07/11/2001 07:18 PM

		 To: Jim Fallon/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Fred Enochs/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc: Sue Nord/NA/Enron@Enron, Scott Bolton/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Lara Leibman/Enron@EnronXGate
		 Subject: CLEC Licensing and Interconnection Agreement Budget and Timeline

Attached are the following documents, per your request:

1.  Budget for CLEC Licensing and Interconnection Agreement Negotiations, and
Internal Resource Commitments.
2.  Timeline for completing the interconnection agreement process.
3.  Status of our CLEC License Applications, to date.

If you have any comments or questions, feel free to contact me or any of the
EBS Government Affairs team.


-----Original Message-----
From: UWayCampaign@uwnyc.com [mailto:UWayCampaign@uwnyc.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 2:14 PM
To: Platter, Phillip
Subject: United Way Electronic Pledge Confirmation

Dear Phil
Your online pledge has been made to United Way.

If the following pledge information is correct, please take no action on this email.
If this information is incorrect, please contact Dorothy Bodino (212-251-2443), immediately.

Donor Information:
Phil Platter
Enron
503-464-3934
8590 SW Lodi Lane

Tigard, OR United States 97224

Designation Information: The September 11th Fund (New York City)

Payment Information:
- Payment by Credit Card ($ 100)

Receive Gift Acknowledgement:Yes
Receive Email Newsletters:Yes

Pledge Reference Number:IP8711411
The September 11th Fund

Thank you for your gift!


[IMAGE]	         	[IMAGE] vs   [IMAGE]
		Merchant Development Risk in Power Generation

		A Henwood Multi-client Study

		Henwood Energy Services, Inc. (Henwood) offers an opportunity to participate in a cutting edge study of the potential collision of coal and gas and its implications for the electric industry as the battle for the fuel at the margin unfolds.

The recent rise in natural gas price over the past year, culminating in a price spike of historic proportions in January 2001 has many industry participants reevaluating the role of natural gas as the "bridge fuel" for the twenty-first century. Some observers suspect that low cost gas reserves are tapped out, making reliance on this fuel alone imprudent from an overall portfolio standpoint. 		[IMAGE]

		 Currently, there are plans in the works for nearly 40 coal power projects across North America representing 20,000 MW of capacity. Henwood's scenario-based study is designed to cost-effectively enable utilities and project developers assess the regional viability of new, commercially available coal technology using cutting edge screening analysis and their impact on new gas projects.  Participation is limited - sign-up by June 15th to receive the Charter Member price and to participate in the kickoff meeting scheduled for June 20th at the Hyatt Regency Downtown, Houston. Also sign up for the Henwood ERCOT PMA Workshop on June 20th at the same location by calling Jessica Fielder at 916/569-0985.  Click here to learn more about getting in on the ground floor of this opportunity.
		This message is brought to you as a registered user of Energy Central.  If you wish to discontinue receiving this type of message, reply to this message with 'Stop Ads' in the subject of your message.


Kent,

Thanks a lot. Look forward to meeting you on campus.

Vince

"Kent Garrett" <kgarrett@andrew.cmu.edu> on 11/05/2000 01:06:21 PM
To: <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Your visit to Carnegie Mellon

Vince:
 I would like to personally thank you for spending the day with us at the
MSCF program at Carnegie Mellon.  The time you spent talking to us about
Enron, and the energy industry in general, was very much appreciated.  In
fact, I believe some students who were not previously interested in energy
are now interested because of the things about which you spoke.  I have
signed up for an interview for the Associate program at Enron, and I hope to
speak to you again through involvement in the Associate program.  Thanks
again.

Sincerely,

Kent Garrett

Kent Garrett
M.S. in Computational Finance
Carnegie Mellon University
(412)362-7443


Unfortunately I will be out of the office on Wednesday.

Hunter


Sorry for the no call.  I was busy until about 10 pm and....well I just got
interupted.

Anyway, I'll call you later...ok?   I promise.

Mat


_________________________________________________________________

            B R E A K F A S T   W I T H   T H E   F O O L
                      Friday, December 1, 2000

benjamin.rogers@enron.com
_________________________________________________________________

REGISTER TO BECOME A FOOL -- GET FREE STUFF!
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=223137
_________________________________________________________________

 Sponsored By: BUYandHOLD
 Hey Fool! Want to know the SECRET to long-term investing?
 Compounding and dollar-cost averaging! Start investing with
 as little as $20! Just $2.99 per order.
 http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=223138

"Why not go out on a limb? That's where the fruit is."
--Mark Twain

PEPSI COURTING QUAKER, AGAIN
Quaker Oats and Pepsi are talking once more, but will the
outcome be the same?

By Mike Trigg

The Quaker Oats (NYSE: OAT) story took another spin yesterday,
when the world's second-largest soft drink company, PepsiCo
(NYSE: PEP), resumed talks to purchase the maker of Gatorade for
$14.3 billion. Not long ago, similar discussions were brought to
a halt after Quaker rejected Pepsi's offer, citing a dispute in
price.

The story with Quaker is an interesting one. After similar talks
with Coca-Cola (NYSE: KO) and French food conglomerate Groupe
Danone (NSYE: DA) failed to materialize, investors are left to
ask: Is this time for real?
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=223139

According to The Wall Street Journal, the two sides appear close
to agreement, with the deal potentially wrapping up in the next
couple of days. If the two sides in fact do reach agreement, an
announcement would be made Monday morning. Both companies have
planned board meetings for this Saturday.
http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=223140

Apparently, the proposed deal is no different than the last.
Quaker Oats shareholders would receive 2.3 shares of Pepsi
stock, valued at $104.36, based on Pepsi's closing price of
$43.38 yesterday. That's a 27% premium to Quaker Oats, stock
price as of November 2, the day original talks were made public.
Pepsi hasn't offered a "collar" -- the original deal breaker --
to Quaker, which is a form of price protection that fixes a
price within a set limit of how far the buyer's shares can rise
or fall. The same Wall Street Journal article reports that an
arrangement is being negotiated that would allow Quaker to
abandon the deal if the value provided to Quaker shareholders
became less than $90 per share upon closing.

If the deal does go through this time around Pepsi would surpass
Coca-Cola as the leader in the non-carbonated U.S drinks market,
holding nearly one-third of the market, compared to Coca-Cola's
21%. According to the Street, Pepsi would also be able to jump
start sales of Quaker Chewy Granola bars, selling them through
its Frito-Lay food division.
_________________________________________________________________

NEWS TO GO

Information transfer device maker Crossroads Systems (Nasdaq:
CRDS) announced better-than-expected third-quarter results after
the market's close yesterday, reporting a net loss (excluding
goodwill and stock compensation) of $4.8 million, or $0.18 per
share, compared to a loss of $870,000, or $0.04 per share, in
the year-ago period. The Street consensus called for the company
to lose $0.21 per share. Crossroads, top line came in at $8.4
million, an 18% increase year-over-year.

Discount airline company Cheap Tickets (Nasdaq: CTIX) announced
that CFO Dale Jorgensen plans on retiring in February. Jorgenson
will remain with the company after his retirement to aid in the
transition and provide assistance on certain projects. ``While
my time with Cheap Tickets has been very rewarding, I have
decided to devote more time to my family and other personal
interests. I am very pleased to have been part of the progress
the company has made moving into the public market and see a
great future for Cheap Tickets' unique multi-channel revenue and
distribution model,'' said Jorgensen.

Carbon dioxide seller Kinder Morgan Energy Partners (NYSE: KMP)
announced a deal with GATX Corp. (NYSE: GMT) to purchase two oil
product pipelines and 12 storage terminals for $1.15 billion in
cash and debt. Kinder Morgan Partners Chairman and CEO Richard
Kinder estimated the deal would increase earnings per share
between $1.62 and $1.75 in 2001, with the Street consensus
calling for the company to earn between $1.50 and $1.62 a share
in the coming year. The deal is expected to close in the first
quarter of next year.

Heating and cooling products provider Modine Manufacturing
(Nasdaq: MODI) announced that it was revising earnings and sales
forecasts for its third quarter and the full fiscal year (ends
March 31, 2001). The Racine, Wisconsin-based company expects
third-quarter revenue to be down 10% to 13% and earnings 55% to
65%. For the full year, sales should be down 7% to 10% with
earnings dropping between 25% and 30%. The company cited a weak
euro and lower sales in the heavy-truck and light-vehicle
markets. Modine earned $2.20 per share in the previous year.

Steel processing company Worthington Industries (NYSE: WOR)
announced that its second-quarter (ended yesterday) earnings
would fall short of expectations and that it had halted its
proposed $300 million acquisition of three Pennsylvania limited
partnerships: MetalTech, NexTech, and GalvTech. The company said
earnings would be substantially lower than the $0.15 per share
it posted in the previous quarter and that the full-year Street
earnings expectation of $1.07 was unrealistic. The Street
consensus called for the company to earn $0.22 per share in the
second quarter. The company cited the weakness in several of its
business, including its steel-processed products operations.
_________________________________________________________________

EDITORS' PICK

Gene Logic CEO Mark Gessler talks about the fascinating things
the company will be able to accomplish via human-genome mining.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=223141
_______________________________________________________________

-News & Commentary
 http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=223142

-Fool Community
 http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=223143

-Post of the Day
 http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=223144

-Latest Fribble
 http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=223145

-Latest Market Numbers
 http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=223146
____________________________________________________________

My Portfolio: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=223147
My Discussion Boards: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=223148
My Fool: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=223149
Fool.com Home: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=223150
My E-Mail Settings: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=223151

 Sponsored By: BUYandHOLD
 Hey Fool! Want to know the SECRET to long-term investing?
 Compounding and dollar-cost averaging! Start investing with
 as little as $20! Just $2.99 per order.
 http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=223152

17 INDUSTRIES WORTH A LOOK
 See which industries our writers think
 will be hot next year with Industry Focus 2001.
http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=223153

TEN SECRETS TO RETIRING EARLY
 Read a free preview of this report on Soapbox.com
http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=223154

FOOL DIRECT E-MAIL SERVICES
 Need to change your address or unsubscribe? You
 can also temporarily suspend mail delivery. Click here:
http://www.fool.com/community/freemail/freemaillogin.asp?email=benjamin.rogers
@enron.com>

Have ideas about how we can improve the Fool Direct or new
e-mail products you'd like to see? Try our discussion board:
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=223155
____________________________________________________
(c) Copyright 2000, The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. This
material is for personal use only. Republication and
redissemination, including posting to news groups, is expressly
prohibited without the prior written consent of The Motley Fool.

.

MsgId:
msg-27276-2000-12-01_9-40-43-348432_2_Plain_MessageAddress.msg-09:45:25(12-01-
2000)
X-Version: mailer-sender-master,v 1.84
X-Version: mailer-sender-daemon,v 1.84
Message-Recipient: benjamin.rogers@enron.com


<<Chevron-Compression- June Draft2_.doc>> Please take a look at this and
let me know what you think.

Ed Wick
281-561-3990

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric Gillaspie [SMTP:Eric.Gillaspie@enron.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 12, 2000 5:55 PM
> To: fwic@chevron.com; George Weissman; Cheryl Lantz Marshall
> Cc: Gerald Nemec
> Subject: Chevron-HPL Compression Agreement
>
>
>
> Mr Wick,
>
> Attached for your review and comment is the HPL-Chevron Compression
> Agreement we
> recently discussed.  Your requested changes have been implemented into the
> document.  If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to
> reach me
> at the number below or Gerald Nemec at 713.853.3512.  It was a pleasure
> working
> with you.
>
> (See attached file: Chevron-Compression- June Draft.doc)
>
> Thanks,
>
> Eric Gillaspie
> 713-345-7667
> Enron Building 3886 << File: Mac Word 3.0 >>

 - Chevron-Compression- June Draft2_.doc


Email is once again available.

Dave

-----Original Message-----
From: Steiner, David
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 11:50 AM
To: DL-Portland World Trade Center
Subject: !!!!!!!!!!!GONE.SCR VIRUS Warning!!!!!!!!!!!11
Importance: High

Immediately delete and DO NOT OPEN email

From:         Alam, Raf

Subject:    HI

Attached file:    GONE.SCR

This is a serious virus and we are working on a solution.

Dave


Tana,
I didn't have much luck with the gentlemen in London.  His counterpart in the
US is Jim Paul and he'll try to get it signed.  I wasn't sure if you need to
change anything in the document for the US.  Please email a revised copy to
jpaul@carrfut.com.  His mail address is Carr Futures, Inc., One World Trade
Center, 92nd Floor, NY, NY 10048.

Thanks,

Dan
---------------------- Forwarded by Daniel Diamond/HOU/ECT on 03/07/2001
09:46 AM ---------------------------
From: Tana Jones on 02/22/2001 10:41 AM
To: mthomas@carrfut.com
cc: Daniel Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Greenberg/NA/Enron@ENRON
Subject: NDA - Carr Futures, Inc.

At the request of Dan Diamond, I am attaching our proposed form of
Non-Disclosure Agreement.   If the enclosed meets with your approval, please
execute the agreement and return it to me via fax no. (713) 646-3490.  I will
then have it executed by an officer of EnronOnline.  If you have any comments
or questions please do not hesitate to call me at (713) 853-3399, or Mark
Greenberg, Senior Counsel, at (713) 345-8897.  We look forward to hearing
from you.


Attention: All Downtown Locations

Enron Center construction is crossing Smith St.

Contractors are now working on the structural supports for the new &Sky Ring8
circular bridge which will connect the 2nd floor of the existing Enron
Buiding to the new Enron Center Campus.

Caution!

Public sidewalks along Smith and Bell Streets will be affected by
construction activity.  Pedestrians commuting to and from work will have
accessable routes along these streets but some restrictions are expected.

Please!

Exercise care when in the area.  Please watch where you walk, always stay
within designated walkways, obey traffic signals and police officers, and do
not jaywalk.

Thank You

- The Building Guy


Rick, we have re-examined the portfolio as a result of our last meeting and
have an expected portfolio of $500M (gross) or $408M (net-ENA's share) to be
placed into Raptor on September 1.  We have a second tranche of $608M (gross)
or $396M (net ENA's share) to be placed into Raptor 2 on December 1.

Kafus, Ecogas, Brigham, Crown Energy and Merlin CLO Equity Option will not be
part of either Raptor 1 or Raptor 2.

Please confirm that this is consistent with you view of capacity and timing.

Regards
Delainey


only if you promise to post regular updates on the trucking market.

call chris gaskill to get the password.

From:	Matthew Arnold/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/04/2001 10:22 AM
To:	John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

	sign me up for the gas message board


Tych told me Lucci was done.
Hunter told me that Lewis was done.
Witt implies to me he was done.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Slone, Jeanie
Sent:	Monday, April 23, 2001 3:35 PM
To:	Lavorato, John
Subject:	The Email

The following agreements are complete and executed:

EXECUTED AGREEMENTS	Grant Submitted
ALLEN, PHILLIP K	April / May / June Grant
ARNOLD, JOHN D	April Grant
BRESLAU, CRAIG A	May Grant
DAVIES, DEREK J	May / June / July Grant
DEVRIES, PAUL	May Grant
ERMIS, FRANK J	May Grant
HOLST, KEITH A	May Grant
MAGGI, MICHAEL J	May Grant
MILNTHORP, PHILLIP ROBSON	April / May / June Grant
NEAL, SCOTT M	May / June / July Grant
SCHWIEGER, JAMES E	May Grant
SHIVELY, HUNTER	April / May / June Grant
VICKERS, FRANK W	May Grant

The following agreements are not signed.  I have spoken w/ either the employee,manager or Dawn Doucet and made them aware that the document has to be signed by today in order to have a May submission for rest stk/options.  Each needed more time or had specific issues they said they w/d discuss with you.

OUTSTANDING AGREEMENTS
COWAN, MICHAEL R
KUYKENDALL, KEVIN W
LE DAIN, ERIC G
LEWIS, ANDREW H
LUCCI, PAUL T
MAY, LAWRENCE J
STOREY, GEOFFREY C
VETTERS, CHARLES M
WHITT, MARK

Let me know if you need more information.  Thanks.


You bet, Jan and Tracey already have it on their calendars.

-----Original Message-----
From: Harris, Steven
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 7:43 AM
To: Watson, Kimberly
Subject: RE: Lunch

Yes, should we also invite Jan or Tracy?

-----Original Message-----
From: Watson, Kimberly
Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2001 6:05 PM
To: Harris, Steven; Robertson, Audrey; Donoho, Lindy; Lohman, TK;
Lindberg, Lorraine; Y'Barbo, Paul; McConnell, Mark; Lokay, Michelle
Subject: FW: Lunch

Please let me know if you are available on Tuesday, September 25 to attend a lunch for Palu as an appreciation for her work on TW.

Thanks, Kim.

-----Original Message-----
From:	Moore, Jan
Sent:	Thu 9/20/2001 12:33 PM
To:	Watson, Kimberly
Cc:
Subject:	Lunch

I heard from Palu, she is available for lunch next Tuesday.

Jan


The meeting will take place in ECS06100.

Thanks,
Amanda

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Neal, Scott
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 2:22 PM
To:	Ring, Andrea; Ames, Chuck; Townsend, Judy; Mckay, Jonathan; Brawner, Sandra F.
Cc:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	trading plan and products, etc meeting

I would like to get together Monday, February 4 at 9:30am to discuss the startup of our business
including products, points, responsibilities etc.

Amanda will notify you with the location.

Thanks,

Scott


It's changed to APS. I'm wondering about the status of APS and Pinnacle - I
guess the traders here had heard we were now doing our trades with Pinnacle,
not APS. Is this incorrect? Do you know who might know about that?

Thanks,
kate

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
03/22/2001 12:13 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: deal 557724

Tom ALonso
deal 557724
Bloomberg shows cp name as Arizona Public Service and enpower has Pinnacle
West
Can you please check with Tom on the correct cp name.

Thanks


The report named: CE P/L <http://trv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=4&report_name=CE+P/L&category_cd=3&category_name=CENTRAL&toc_hide=1&sTV1=3&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=11/15/2001>, published as of 11/15/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


Sorry I can't help.
Also, you know that legal will be out of the office from Wed. afternoon
through the end of the week.  Are there any pressing items?  Sara

Laurel Adams
04/04/2000 11:50 AM
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rod Nelson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Davis
Thames/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: EMP Echo

I faxed the final confirmation to Patti Melcher at Echo yesterday.  In order
to get the counterparty set up in Global, I need something on EMP Echo
letterhead.  Does anyone have anything that they could fax to me, that
indicates the full company name, address, and maybe even bank instructions?
( I know--I'm asking for a lot!)  Thanks very much for your help.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	"Jack Belcher - Exchange" <jbelcher@chemweek.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Jack+20Belcher+20-+20Exchange+22+20+3Cjbelcher+40chemweek+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Thursday, May 17, 2001 3:23 PM
To:	steve blalock; Spencer Kelly; Nick Snow; Mary Aucoin; Karl Lang; Doug Gill; David Sweet; Parks, Joe
Subject:	Fw: Email from Adam Sieminski -- US Natural Gas Inventories Rise Relentlessly

----- Original Message -----
From: <jay.saunders@db.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 4:06 PM
Subject: Email from Adam Sieminski -- US Natural Gas Inventories Rise
Relentlessly

> Last week's 119 bcf injection into U.S. natural gas storage - the largest
> weekly injection since mid-June 1994 - leaves current storage of 1.077 tcf
> only 86 bcf below last year and 40 bcf from the middle of the 1994-1999
> range. Based on seasonal patterns, large injections should continue over
the
> next nine weeks, when storage increases are typically the largest of the
> year. So far this injection season, inventories have risen 450 bcf, or
100%
> faster than the typical rate of 220 over the first six weeks of the refill
> season. If inventories rise only half that rate, at 50% faster than the
> norm, storage would pass the middle of the typical range next week and end
> October at nearly 3 tcf, or 120 bcf from the top of the range.
>
> While our projected inventory injections seem bearish, we still look for
> relatively strong price support above $4/mmBtu through the year. Even with
> inventories rising quickly, there seems to be genuine concern for the need
> to satisfy summer demand for electricity (air conditioning), especially in
> the Southwest U.S. By the end of the year, however, we expect inventory
> coverage of forward demand to be on par with normal levels.
>
> While we continue to feel that demand has been a major contributor to the
> large storage injections, supply also seems to be playing a stronger role.
> Reported DOE growth of 3% in 2000, which comes with a one percentage point
> room for error due to data imperfections, comes mostly from Texas and
> Wyoming. From Canada, higher than expected production from Alberta, in
> addition to the eastern offshore, seems to have influenced the large
> shipments to the U.S. Contrary to expectation, the Alliance pipeline has
> been running at 1.5 bcf/d capacity - and often beyond - since its
> commencement last November.
>
>  <<gas inventory 0517.pdf>>
>
> ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST
>
> Jay Saunders
> Deutsche Banc Alex. Brown Inc.
> 1 South Street  BAL01-1628
> Baltimore, MD   21202
> Office:  410-895-3341     Fax:   410-895-3202
> Mobile: 443-794-4183
> E-mail: jay.saunders@db.com
>
>
> Information herein is believed to be reliable and has been obtained from
> sources believed to be reliable, but its accuracy and completeness cannot
be
> guaranteed. Opinions, estimates, and projections constitute our judgement
> and are subject to change without notice. This material is provided to you
> for information purposes only and is not intended as an offer or
> solicitation for the sale of any financial instrument. Deutsche Banc Alex.
> Brown Inc. and its affiliates worldwide may hold a position or act as
market
> maker in the financial instruments of any issuer discussed herein or act
as
> an advisor or lender to such issuer. Transactions should be executed
through
> a Deutsche Bank entity in the client's home jurisdiction unless otherwise
> permitted by law. Deutsche Banc Alex. Brown Inc. is a member of the NYSE
and
> NASD.  Copyright 2001 Deutsche Banc Alex. Brown Inc.
>
>
>

 - gas inventory 0517.pdf


From : Vivek Menezes
To   : Mr. Kenneth L. Lay (klay@enron.com)
       Chairman & CEO,
       Enron Corp.

Dear Mr. Lay,

With reference to my email dated 11/10/2000 introducing Tata Housing as a
premium real estate developer in India, we had mentioned the availability of
our premises, Technopolis KnowledgePark being a ready to move in building
with all the facilities required for a good Call Centre.  Further, we also
mentioned that Tata Housing has a large land bank and can offer properties
to Enron for Call Centres across the country.

We would like to make a clarification wherein the words &Call Centres8
should read as &Data Centres8.

Thanking you

Yours faithfully,
TATA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CO. LTD.

Vivek Menezes
Manager ) Marketing & Sales
cc  :   Mr. Sanjay Bhatnagar ) CEO
    :   Mr. Wade Cline ) COO
    :   Mr. P. Sreekumar
    :   Mr. Hemant Luthra
        Enron India Pvt. Ltd.
        56, Maker Chambers VI
        Nariman Point
        Mumbai ) 400 021.


i bet you could teach me something huh?


---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 10/17/2000 02:51 PM
---------------------------

Kenneth Horton@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
10/16/2000 05:13 PM
To: Sally Beck@ECT
cc: Lynn Bellinghausen/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Doorstep Meeting

Sally,

Following our Doorstep meeting today, I am following up on your request that
I forward to you the list of Portland transactions for which we still require
documentation, e.g. invoices, SAP entries, etc.  For the Settlements testing
only, we reduced the deal population from 23 to ten randomly-selected
transactions, in order to facilitate the Settlement group's ability to
complete both its monthly close obligations and our Doorstep request.  The
deal selection is indicated in yellow, and the missing items, in green.

Also per your request, attached are the five "non-standard" deals for which
we have been unable to obtain any information at all.  Our primary need is
just to get a basic understanding of these transactions.

Colorado Springs Utilities  10/1/98-9/30/03 Colorado 50-150 MWs
BPA     10/1/01-12/31/05 NW Delivered 105 MWs
Welded Tube    1/1/98-6/30/05 PGE - NW 5.2-12MWs
British Columbia Power Exchange 1/1/98-1/1/15 COB 85-176 MWs
Harbor Cogen

Thank you for your help, Sally,
Ken


Please grant Steve access

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lagrasta, Fred
Sent:	Thursday, June 07, 2001 1:35 PM
To:	Presto, Kevin M.
Cc:	Abramo, Caroline; Plauche, Stephen
Subject:	Power Pricing Model

Kevin, I would appreciate you authorizing Stephen Plauche access to the power pricing model for indicative pricing of power structures to market to the New York hedge funds.Thanks, Fred.


Thought y'all might find this amusing.
---------------------- Forwarded by Steve Venturatos/HOU/ECT on 10/19/2000
02:45 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Kelly Lombardi @ ENRON                           10/17/2000 06:34 PM

To: Cyndie Balfour-Flanagan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steve Venturatos/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Gorons

Don't know who you're voting for, but here some things you might want to
consider-

What is a Goron

   1. Gorons sincerely believe that Vice President Gore is a true
environmentalist, when he has an environmental disaster on his own farm:
a polluting zinc mine, from which he received $500,000 of income last
year.

   2. Gorons likewise believe that the VP is antismoking and anti-tobacco
when  he has operated a tobacco farm for decades and accepted government
subsidies.

   3. Gorons truly believe that Gore is a Vietnam war hero, when in fact
he was  placed by family influence in a "cushy"  correspondent's job and
the only  action he saw was that of his Brownie camera! (and his bong)

   4. Gorons actually believe that Mr. Gore is justified in illegally
raising political funds from the Office of the VP, simply because the
Vanderbilt Law  educated VP claims he was ignorant of the illegality.

   5. Gorons further believe that it was OK for Al to accept large sums
of political money from China through Buddhist monks who had taken vows
of poverty, since he again claimed ignorance.

   6. Gorons also believe that the man who claimed to "invent the
Internet" would be so computationally ignorant that he could lose weeks
of potentially  incriminating e-mail!

   7. Gorons, incredibly, believe Gore's claim that he and Tipper were
the models for the book and movie, "Love Story" even though the book's
author,  Erich Segal, says not.

   8. Gorons, amazingly, believe that Gore will be the consumer's
champion against high gasoline prices although Gore holds a million
dollars in Occidental Petroleum stock.

   9. Gorons applaud Mr. Lieberman's open rejection of President
Clinton's immorality, but believe it was fine for Mr. Gore to remain
silent on the subject, while simultaneously declaring Mr. Clinton "one of
the greatest Presidents of our history."

   10. Gorons believe that Al Gore is an effective leader, when they
won't bother to look at his record as a Tennessee Senator, a record so
ineffective  that it has led to the election of Republicans as BOTH of
Tennessee's  Senators!

   11.  Gorons hold the belief that Gore is a compassionate man who will
be the working man's friend, in spite of the eviction notice he served
to the poor family who complained about the conditions of the run down
slum  house that he was renting to them.

   CAUTIONARY NOTE: Medical researchers acknowledge that Gorons are
generally harmless, except when allowed into a voting booth. There,
unfortunately, overcome by their gullibility syndrome, they are apt to
actually vote for Gore! They should be carefully protected from their
ailment, since it may be  harmful to their well-being, yours, mine and
that of the USA.

   Therefore, PLEASE, heed the Surgeon General's warning, reach out to
aid the Gorons in overcoming the syndrome, and,  PLEASE, pass this on to
your normal  friends, who might also know Gorons who need immediate
treatment.


Dear Vince,

Please find the following description of the program that I would like to
raise additional funding for.  I will follow up today with a phone call to
answer any questions you may have.

As always we appreciate your time and support.

Thanks,
Jozef

The Eastern European students at MIT Sloan School of Management are
preparing an Eastern European week to be held in March 2001.  The one-week
long program will familiarize our classmates with many of the countries
that are going through the post communist transformation. As you well know,
Eastern Europe has a great deal of opportunities for many companies.
Unfortunately, it also presents many obstacles that make most of the
opportunities difficult to capture.

Because we believe that we can help to eliminate some of these obstacles,
we want to bring the Eastern European experience to MIT Sloan School of
Management.  Familiarizing the future business leaders with the countries
is only one step toward reforming Eastern Europe, but we believe it is
worth our time and effort.

During the week, we plan to bring series of lectures addressing the
business environment in Eastern Europe.  We want to emphasize especially
the success stories from Eastern Europe.  Such companies as Enron,
Volkswagen, ExxonMobil, GM, and GE have entered the Eastern European market
and show commitment to stay in it.  In at least one panel discussion with
academic experts and industry participants we hope to let everyone know
that Eastern Europe is a real place for business.

In addition to the educational activities, we are preparing number of
cultural events that will introduce the culture of this area.

The scope of our program depends greatly on the funds we will be able to
raise from our sponsors.  In return, we plan to advertise our sponsors in
every activity we will do.  We will make banners and any other appropriate
advertising as desired by the sponsor.  Should a sponsor be willing to send
a speaker for the panel discussion or to give a speech/lecture we would
appreciate the enrichment to our program.

The advertising will reach nearly 700 Sloan students and faculty.  In
addition, the advertising will reach all newly admitted students, as they
will visit our campus for the AdMIT day (an official program to sell our
school to the admitted students).


Your "courtesy copy" of the draft I sent to MK, Drew and Shelley.  We'll put
our heads together and come up with a final version.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Allen, Diana
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 8:05 AM
To:	Black, Tamara Jae
Subject:	FW: NetCo Production Databases Reorg.

TJ.

Can you please let everyone know that our Power Decision Support database will be down today, and could possible stay down until tomorrow morning.

I will notify you as soon as the database comes on line again.

Thanks,

Diana Allen
X35356

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tang, Mable
Sent:	Wednesday, January 30, 2002 1:28 PM
To:	Allen, Diana; Poston, David; Luu, Duong; Lim, Francis S.; Krishnaswamy, Jayant; Chitradurga, Sundar; Powell, John D.; Ramesh, Ganapathy; Schomer, Chris; McKinney, Hal
Cc:	Wei, Zhiyong; Nat, Steve; Johnson, Jeff; Stock, Steve; Hillier, Bob; Berger, Michael; Charbonnet, Clement; Invedy, Tantra; Johnston, Jamey; Ritacco, Michael
Subject:	NetCo Production Databases Reorg.

Hello Everyone,

The Oracle DBA team would like request NetCo production database downtime starting tomorrow Thursday 01/31/2002 at
10am to perform database reorg.  This reorg is important to ensure efficient data access after the data cleansing effort.

Attached is the summary of the reorg work and the estimated downtime.  All NetCo production databases will be ready
no later than Friday 02/01/2002 at 7am if not earlier.

Please response with your approval by COB today.  If you have any further questions, please feel free to contact me or your dbas.

Thanks,
Mable

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Charbonnet, Clement
Sent:	Wednesday, January 30, 2002 12:03 PM
To:	DL-Oracle DBA
Subject:	Database Reorg.

Attached is the spreadsheet of the database reorg sizes.

Clement


-----Original Message-----
From: 	"Mingo, Marcia" <MMingo@reliant.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Wednesday, November 21, 2001 11:40 AM
To:	Nemec, Gerald; Swanson, John B; Bradley, Ken A; Joyce, Michael; Florence, John D; Williams, Stephen
Subject:	LRCI documents

 <<act of sale05.doc>>  <<boardresolution02.doc>>  <<ACT OF SALE
05RED.DOC>>  <<BOARDRESOLUTION0RED.DOC>>

___________________________________________________________
Marcia Mingo
Reliant Resources, Inc.
Phone: (713) 207-4643
Fax: (713) 207-0161

The preceding e-mail message contains information that is confidential,
may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges,
and may constitute non-public information.  It is intended to be
conveyed only to the designated recipient(s).  If you are not an
intended recipient of this message, please do not read, copy or disclose
the contents of this communication to others and please notify the
sender at (713) 207-3331.  If you are not the intended recipient, we
would appreciate your forwarding the message back to us and deleting it
from your system.  Unauthorized use, dissemination, distribution, or
reproduction of this message is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
Thank you.

 - act of sale05.doc
 - boardresolution02.doc
 - ACT OF SALE 05RED.DOC
 - BOARDRESOLUTION0RED.DOC


When: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 1:30 PM-2:30 PM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada).
Where: Shelley's Office

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

I would like to get together to discuss future opportunities and to follow up on your upodate meeting you had this afternoon, thank you.


I believe Kodak just doesn't support the USB connection very well.  I tried
the other connection and it works great.  I pulled all the tractor pictures
off the camera with no problem.  I still have not seen a photo as clear as
the very first one Chance pulled up of the family reunion though.

All the tractor pictures are a little fuzzy.


The attached letter is being delivered this morning to the FERC
commissioners.  Since the letter concerns a matter currently pending before
the commission it will also be served on the parties.  We plan to talk to the
press about it as well.  A number of other companies and organizations are
also submitting letters and we have helped prepare an EPSA filing which
focusses specifically on California.  Our best information at this point is
that the FERC staff report regarding California is generally accurate, and
therefore, favorable.  While it will mention periodic exercises of market
power, it is expected to lay blame for California's woes at the feet of
California's own decisions about market structure.  It is further expected
that the report will not provide a basis for ordering refunds.  On the other
hand, the Commission's order (to be considered tomorrow along with the
staff's report) is expected to at least put refunds on the table for comment
and to discuss, and perhaps implement, further price caps.  This is just our
best guess at this point.  the Commission has put special emphasis on putting
the report and order under wraps until wednesday.
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 10/31/2000 07:24 AM -----

	Rosalee Fleming
	10/30/2000 06:00 PM

		 To: Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, dwatkiss@bracepatt.com
		 cc: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Hoecker letter


Rob,
Look at the conforming languange in the Appendix "A" last page, last
paragraph.  You know that this language was negotiated by and between
SoCalGas and Edison.  My main concern is that its very, very open ended...
almost a contingent liability for all settlement parties.

Jeff


Susan:  Would you please handle this?  I'll also send Elliott Bonner's
request with an address.  It should match (we'll need to check) the master
agreement address.  Let me know if you have any questions.  Thanks.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 05/17/2001 09:11 AM -----

	Elliot Bonner/ENRON@enronXgate
	05/17/2001 09:08 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: Swaps

 -----Original Message-----
From:  "Weltmer, Dewann (HNA)" <Dewann.Weltmer@hjheinz.com>@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Weltmer+2C+20Dewann+20+28HNA+29+22+20+3CDewann+2EWeltmer
+40hjheinz+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 7:17 AM
To: Bonner, Elliot
Subject: RE: Swaps

Hello Elliot,
Sorry I couldn't get back with you until now.  Either I am out of the office
or in meetings all day.  Last we spoke you were going to send me a copy of
the previous agreed upon ISDA between Heinz and Enron.  I believe you wanted
our legal contact but is there anyway you can send the copy to my attention.
I would like to have a copy for my files.
We have not made a decision yet on linerboard swaps.  I have a meeting with
my General Manager on Monday PM and hope to know more.
Can you please send me a copy of the ISDA prior to Monday PM?
Thanks,
Dewann Weltmer
Heinz NA
Procurement Packaging
412-237-3538 (phone)
412-237-3543 (fax)
-----Original Message-----
From: Elliot.Bonner@enron.com [mailto:Elliot.Bonner@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 8:31 AM
To: Dewann.Weltmer@hjheinz.com
Subject: RE: Swaps
Have you made a decision on this swap yet?  Please let me know either way.
Thanks.
    -----Original Message-----
   From:   "Weltmer, Dewann (HNA)" <Dewann.Weltmer@hjheinz.com>@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Weltmer+2C+20Dewann+20+28HNA+29+22+20+3CDewann+2EWeltmer
+40hjheinz+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
   Sent:   Tuesday, May 01, 2001 6:10 AM
   To:     Bonner, Elliot
   Subject:  Swaps
   Hi Elliott,
   I talked with Corby and today we have an offer around $428/ton for 2
   years 5,000 tons.  Can you provide a better offer that we could discuss?
   Thanks,
   Dewann Weltmer
   Heinz NA
   Procurement Packaging
   412-237-3538 (phone)
   412-237-3543 (fax)


Tony,

Thanks for the invitation. I shall be glad to meet your wife and havea dinner
at your house.

Take care

Vince

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Thanks

Vince,
Thank you for a very wonderful dinner. I thoroughly enjoyed it and hope you
did too. We should do this again. Elisabeth and I would be very pleased to
have you for dinner at our house one day soon. I shall let you know.
Meanwhile let's have coffee when I move over to EBS.
Below is the URL  for TotalE the disc and video company.
www.totale.com  Hope you find it useful.
Tony


FYI,  dont forget to change the box in CAPS for primary server.

Thanks,
JMF
---------------------- Forwarded by John M Forney/HOU/ECT on 12/04/2000 09:52
AM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  CRCommunications <CRCommunications@caiso.com>
 12/04/2000 09:48 AM

To: ISO Market Participants
<IMCEAEX-_O=CAISO_OU=CORPORATE_CN=DISTRIBUTION+20LISTS_CN=ISO+20MARKET+20PARTI
CIPANTS@caiso.com>
cc:
Subject: CAISO Notification- URGENT NOTIFICATION: SI RETURN TO PRIMARY SE
RVER, TOMORROW, December 5, 2000 (1520 to 1550)

    CHANGE** URGENT NOTIFICATION:  SI RETURN TO
PRIMARY SERVER, TOMORROW,
     December 5, 2000 (1520 to 1550)

    Network Maintenance has been extended.

    Please submit all Hour Ahead schedules for
December  5th  HE , 1900 and 2000 and Supplemental Energy schedules for,
1800 and 1900 prior to 1500.

    The URL to our Primary site is:
https://iso_si/iso.

    Please contact Ginger Seitles (916) 351-4420
or gseitles@caiso.com if you have any questions or concerns.

    Thank you,
    ISO Market Operations


The detail that we currently have on the interconnect for Mary Jo Johnson.

---------------------- Forwarded by Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT on 09/15/99 04:35 PM
---------------------------
From: Chris Sonneborn on 09/15/99 04:21 PM
To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Spanish Camp to Mobil Vanderbuilt 14-inch interconnect

Gerald -

Here is a copy of the scoping document that I passed along to Glenn Gregory.

Thanks,
Chris Sonneborn
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Sonneborn/HOU/ECT on 09/15/99 04:17
PM ---------------------------
From: Chris Sonneborn on 09/13/99 03:51 PM
To: Glenn Gregory/GCO/Enron@Enron
cc: Kevin Kuehler/GPGFIN/Enron@Enron, Mary Jo Johnson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Garry D
Wilson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary A Hanks/HOU/ECT@ECT, James McKay/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Spanish Camp to Mobil Vanderbuilt 14-inch interconnect

Glenn,

Mary Jo Johnson is working on a facilities agreement with Mobil to
interconnect the Spanish Camp 6-inch line to the Mobil 14-inch Vanderbuilt
pipeline.  HPL will be responsible for setting a 6"x6" tee, riser, and
above-ground valve on the Spanish Camp lateral.  I suggest the 6x6 because
the gas sales contract that will go along with the facilities agreement
should specify an HPL scheduled delivery rate from 0 to 20,000 MMBtu/d.  The
6-inch will minimize pressure losses off of the Spanish Camp line and will
maximize our ability to expand this point in the future, if necessary.
Assume that we will need to acquire a small section of surface easement for
the above-ground valve.

Looking at our as-built drawings (HC-1025-09-H) it appears that the Mobil
line crosses the Spanish Camp 6-inch at Station Plus 77+40 in the middle of a
pasture.  I spoke with Lonnie earlier today, who said that he would be in
that area on Wednesday and can verify that I have correctly located the
line.  The crossing pipeline is incorrectly identified as a 16-inch Natural
Gas line on the as-built.

Mary Jo has asked for some agressive timing on setting the tee, in that she
would like to have it set for an 1 October, 1999 completion date.  In that
light, would you please approach this from the perspective of preparing a
work-order rather than a preliminary cost estimate.

If any of these specifications change, I will let you know immediately.

Thanks,
Chris Sonneborn
HPL Facility Planning
N.A. Gas and Transmission Asset Group


Dear Casey,

	Reports have been backup except for the following Post IDs:

	15563, 15586, 15591, 15667, 15669.

	We are trying to restore those as of right now.

	Regards,

Norman.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Evans, Casey
Sent:	Thursday, January 10, 2002 6:56 PM
To:	Lee, Norman; Yang, Zhiyun
Cc:	White, Stacey W.
Subject:	Port Calc Backup

Norman/Doc,

Please backup the following post ids as we will be using the reports from those calcs for a few more weeks:

14826 thru 14833
15489
15503 thru 15510
15563
15591 thru 15599
15586
15667
15669
15678
15679
15785 thru 15789

Thanks!
Casey


Thank you

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Jones, Tana
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 10:21 AM
To: Anderson, Clinton
Subject: Re: Copy of Master Agreement

If you are looking for a copy of an ISDA  Master Agreement with Exxon, there
is none.  If you are looking for a physical power master you need to contact
Rhonda Denton.  I have access to financial trading agreements only.

	Clinton Anderson/ENRON@enronXgate 05/23/2001 07:49 AM 	   To: Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT  cc:   Subject: Copy of Master Agreement

Tana:

Don Scott of Exxon Power Team contacted the EOL Call Center this morning
requesting a copy of his Company Master Agreement because it has been
misplaced.  I am not sure if you are the correct person to handle such
request.  Could you please assist or forward to the correct party responsible
for such a request.

Customer Info:

Don Scott
Exxon Power Team
610 765 6727  office
610 765 7727  fax
Dscott@pwrteam.com

Thanks for your assistance in this matter.

CA
EnronOnline Help Desk


James,

My name is Kim Watson and I'm thinking that I received this message in error.  Please advise.

Thanks, Kim.

-----Original Message-----
From: James Enslow [mailto:jenslow@mfgwest.com]
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 5:34 PM
To: 'kwatson@enron.com'
Subject: Drawings

Kurt we still need the cold weather handrail drawings for the Enclosure &
Spinner.
Can you please have Dave Skousen forward me a copy as soon as possible.
Thanks,
James


If anyone is interested in an administrative position in HR, please see me by
close of business Wednesday for more details.

Thanks!
Amy


Randy.  What do other multinationals operating in Brazil do?  JP Morgan or
Citibank?   Mark

	Randy Young@ENRON
	01/10/2001 06:49 AM

		 To: Sami Arap/SA/Enron@Enron, Robert C
Williams/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc: Michelle Blaine/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
margalith@elektro.com.br, Rob Walls@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John
Novak/SA/Enron@Enron, Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Elektro's telecom project

For what it is worth, I agree with Sami's concern that we may laboring under
a false sense of security in assuming that a foreign arbitration provision in
a Brazilian contract, between Brazilian contracting parties relating to a
Brazilian matter in controversy would be easily enforced by a Brazilian
court.  Inevitably, we have to fight hard for these "concessions" in our
negotiations and end up leaving a lot of Enron consideration (not to mention
blood and sweat) on the table to get these provisions inserted in our
contracts.  If we are really being "taken" by these crafty Brazilian lawyers
(like the former General Counsel of the Odebrecht Group), I think we should
re-think the policy in this specific instance.

Elektro, because it is the fifth largest electricity LDC in Brazil, has a
long history of litigation in the Sao Paulo courts (we had a number of cases,
you will recall, when we bought it, and have had others since). It is clearly
not the only substantial, high-profile Brazilian company Enron has down here,
making it a little hard for us to negotiate these provisions as "foreigners"
the way we do elsewhere.

By all means we should check with Jose Emilio, but if he shares Sami's (and,
I have to say, my) concerns, I think we should consider making a special rule
for Brazil-to-Brazil contracting transactions.  Perhaps we could have the
first position be ICC arbitration in Sao Paulo (in English?), with a forum
savings clause that states that if the arbitration provision is held
unenforceable that the litigation will be in the courts (federal, if
possible) of Sao Paulo.  The worst thing that could happen is that we enter
into an arbitration provision, thinking we are safe, and end up in some court
in a smaller city in a backwater part of Brazil where they are a little loose
on the law and perhaps even looser on the concepts of justice, due process,
etc.

If you would like me to be involved in the further discussions, let me know.

Randy

Sami Arap
01/10/2001 06:20 AM
To: Robert C Williams/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Michelle Blaine/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
margalith@elektro.com.br, Randy Young@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rob
Walls@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Re: Elektro's telecom project

Thanks again, Bob.

I will call Jos, Emilio to check.  I agree that a foreign arbitral award is
enforceable in Brazil (whether international or local aspects are under
discussion) provided that you follow the "exequatur" procedure at the
Brazilian Supreme Court.  I have personally participated in the enforcement
of a foreign arbital award against Odebrecht a few years ago.

However, the point I am raising is that in case one of the two Brazilian
contracting entities challenge such foreign arbitration clause and refer the
matter under dispute to a local court, it is most likely that the Brazilian
judge will accept jurisdiction and review the case, in accordance with
Article 88 (I)(II)(III) of the Brazilian Civil Procedure Code.  In such
event, if Enron (please note that I am always & only referring to an Enron
Brazilian entity) agrees to a foreign arbitration clause with a Brazilian
counterparty, it may end up resolving its contractual disputes at the
Brazilian courts (and this is exactly what I am trying to avoid by suggesting
ICC arbitration in S?o Paulo for all contracts entered into between two
Brazilian entities).

Even if the two Brazilian contracting entities refer the matter under dispute
to foreign arbitration and, at the same time or at a later stage, one of the
parties decide to challenge the foreign arbitration clause and refer the
matter to the local courts, it is most likely that the Brazilian Supreme
Court will recognize the local courts jurisdiction and decide that the
foreign arbitration clause was null and void.

I will be in Houston on Friday, January 26, and would very much appreciate
the opportunity to discuss this matter in detail with you and possibly with
Rob Walls and/or Jim Derrick.

Regards,

Sami

Robert C Williams@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
01/09/2001 10:18 PM
To: Sami Arap/SA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Michelle Blaine/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
margalith@elektro.com.br@ENRON, Randy Young, Rob Walls

Subject: Re: Elektro's telecom project

Sami,

I agree on the issue of Brazilian law.  But on the question of foreign
arbitration, our advice has been that such a clause will be enforced by the
local courts, even if the dispute has no international aspects other than the
parent is foreign (although there was a dissenting opinion from one lawyer on
this issue).   Could you check this point with Jose Emilio Pinto at Tozzini
or Fernando Serec?  As to local arbitration, we have accepted this where the
dollar amount of the disputes is likely to be less than $500,000.  We should
probably also have a cumulative cap of, say, $5 million.   On bigger deals,
Rob orJim have resisted local court jurisdiction.  The most flexible they
have been to my knowledge where more $ is at stake is to agree to
ICC-administered arbitration in Sao Paulo.  In this case, I think we should
propose the local arbitration procedure which would is best calculated to
result in an impartial award, whether that be ad hoc, ICC, FIESP, or
Canadian-Brazilian C of C.  Jose Emilio would have a view on this, too.  Hope
this is helpful.

Bob

Sami Arap@ENRON
01/09/2001 04:48 PM
To: Michelle Blaine/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Robert C
Williams/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: margalith@elektro.com.br

Subject: Re: Elektro's telecom project

Michelle and Bob;

Thanks for the reply.  The issue here is when Brazilian entities (only) are
entering into a contract which obligations will only be performed in Brazil
and such agreement is governed by Brazilian laws.  My understanding of the
Enron arbitration policy (and please correct me if I am wrong) is that when
Enron (as a foreign company) is dealing with foreign governments,
governmental agencies or government-owned companies, or private companies
from the host company, we must follow our internal policy by choosing
preferred arbitration rules, preferred place of arbitration and preferred
governing law.

In case of Elektro, as well as any other Brazilian Enron entity (EAS, ECE
etc), entering into a contract with another Brazilian party with obligations
to be performed in Brazil, such contract will most likely be governed by
Brazilian laws.  Although the parties are in principle able to select a
foreign law in Brazil, the contracting parties must comply with local public
policy.  I strongly advise that two or more Brazilian parties contracting
obligations in Brazil agree that the respective contract be governed by the
laws of Brazil.

With respect to the dispute resolution mechanism, we are all aware of Enron's
policy to avoid referring disputes to the Brazilian courts.  In case of the
above mentioned Elektro deal, the idea is to submit all contract
controversies to arbitration under ICC rules in S?o Paulo.  To me, the
question is whether we use "ad hoc" arbitration OR institutional arbitration
(i.e. submit the matter to FIESP or the Canadian-Brazilian Chamber of
Commerce to act as the "arbitration administrator").

FYI since I joined Enron, I've been told that all of Enron's Brazilian
entities should use foreign arbitration as their contracts' dispute
resolution mechanism.  In my opinion, this concept may not work the way Enron
wants.  If the local Enron entity is dealing with another Brazilian party and
(suppose) both parties have agreed to use ICC arbitration in NY, it is most
likely that, in case the Brazilian counterparty decides to refer the matter
under dispute to the Brazilian courts, the local judge will accept
jurisdiction and review the case.  You may ask "why".  The reason is because
there are two Brazilian parties contracting obligations to be performed in
Brazil under the laws of Brazil; as a consequence a local judge will accept
jurisdiction.

I'd very much like to emphasize that, while working as General Counsel of the
Odebrecht Group, I use to accept foreign arbitration clauses in contracts
entered with Affiliates of foreign companies because I knew that, at the end
of the day, I could always challenge the dispute resolution mechanism agreed
in the contract and refer the matter to the local courts.  Since Odebrecht's
counterparties did not do their homework properly ...

Arbitration was first introduced in Brazil through the Federal Constitution
of 1824.  The Civil Code of 1916 ractified the use of arbitration, however,
it obliged the arbitral award to be reviewed by the local courts.  Only in
1996, with the issuance of the Brazilian Arbitration Act (Law 9307), it was
recognized the use of arbitration as a definitive dispute resolution
mechanism without having to submit the final arbitral award to the review of
the local courts.

With respect to enforceability, please note that the arbitral award is final,
binding and enforceable towards the contracting parties.  Only in case a
Party decides not to comply with the final arbital award, the other Party may
refer the arbitral award to a local judge to obtain an "exequatur".

Please feel free to contact me at the earliest possible convenience to
continue to discuss this arbitration matter.

Rgds,

Sami

Robert C Williams@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
01/09/2001 03:55 PM
To: Michelle Blaine/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Sami Arap/SA/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Elektro's telecom project

There was a concern at one point that FIESP would favor big, "homegrown"
companies.   I'm sure Sami knows more about this than I do, though.

Michelle Blaine
01/09/2001 12:37 PM
To: Sami Arap/SA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Robert C Williams/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Re: Elektro's telecom project

Definitely we do not want to submit to the local courts.  Do suggest ICC
arbitration but I am only vaguely familiar with FIESP. I think that is fine,
but please remind me what it is.  I am going to call you from my cell in a
little bit because I have to leave the office.

Sami Arap@ENRON
01/09/2001 11:47 AM
To: Robert C Williams/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Michelle
Blaine/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: Elektro's telecom project

Elektro is participating in the negotiation of a telecom project to form a
SPC among Elektro and four other LDCs (Bandeirante, CPFL, CTEEP and EPTE).
The SPC will be named "SP Telecom".  SP Telecom will develop
telecommunication services using the LDCs' infra-structure.  After SP
Telecom's formation, an investor will be selected to purchase the majority of
the company's shares.  Elektro will have a 5% participation in SP Telecom and
this deal will generate approximately US$10MM in revenues for Elektro.

The Parties have been discussing a draft MOU for several months, however,
this matter came to my attention only a few weeks ago.  The MOU has been
reviewed by all Parties and is currently on final rounds of negotiation.

There is one pending issue which I need to discuss with you before I get Jim
Derrick's sign-off.  CTEEP and EPTE (state and private owned LDCs) have
requested that the MOU, as well as any other SP Telecom project agreement,
includes a dispute resolution mechanism through the courts of S?o Paulo.  I
have discussed this matter with Jose Margalith (Elektro's in-house counsel)
and Randy Young, and have suggest Margalith to offer ICC arbitration at FIESP
(the S?o Paulo State Industries Federation) as an alternative.

Orlando Gonzalez asked me to assist him to resolve this pending issue at the
earliest possible convenience.  Any thoughts or ideas ?  Please feel free to
call me (55-11-5503-1226).

Tks for your assistance to this matter.

Sami Arap


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Exchange Information <Marketing@NYMEX.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Wednesday, November 14, 2001 9:02 AM
To:	Exchange Information
Subject:	(MS-76) MEMBER FIRM PRIVILEGES

Notice No. MS-76
November 14, 2001

COMMODITY EXCHANGE, INC.

MEMBER FIRM PRIVILEGES

	Please be advised that effective with the close on November 2, 2001,
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., has acquired Merrill Lynch
Futures, Inc.  Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. has assumed the
clearing member firm privileges of Merrill Lynch Futures, Inc.  As a result,
Merrill Lynch Futures, Inc. has been terminated as a clearing member firm of
COMEX.

	Members and Member firms have (10) days from the date of this notice
to advise the Corporate Secretary's Office of any claims against Merrill
Lynch Futures, Inc.

	Inquires regarding the above should be directed to the Member
Services Department at (212) 299-2377.


just got into the office..assume you got the bill that Bruno faxed


Hello, Maud!

My name is Becky Spencer and I work for Brent Hendry.  In answer to your
question of this morning, yes, Brent did receive the document you sent to him
on April 12th.  Could you please let us know the name of the contact person
here at Enron to whom you have been speaking so we can better coordinate our
discussions with you?

Thank you!  We look forward to doing business with you.

Becky Spencer
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street 38th Floor
Houston TX  77002
713-853-7599 Office
713-646-3490 Fax
My e-mail address:  becky.spencer@enron.com
Brent Hendry's e-mail address:  brent.hendry@enron.com


Dan;

Thanks for your note concerning the subject agreement.  I'm wondering if it
might be more straightforward if we just replace the affected sections of
the form of contract Enron previously provided. ( In preparing the suggested
changes I followed the structure (and headings) of that form.)   With
respect to "OTHER TERMS",  I suggest that the first three paragraphs in the
last version could be replaced.

The suggested changes are reproduced below for ease of reference and use.
Note that the final paragraph anticipates the insertion of a Contract Number
by Enron.

 Regards;

 Michael Kleiner
 Law Department

TIER OF GAS:  As specified in OTHER TERMS, below.
DCQ (IN MMBTUS):  An amount between 0 MMbtu per day and 20,000 MMbtu per
day, as specified in OTHER TERMS, below.
DELIVERY POINT:   The interconnect of ANR Pipeline Co. (Joliet) and Alliance
Pipeline Limited  ("Alliance") provided that Customer will use reasonable
efforts to arrange deliveries to alternate downstream pipelines as Company
may request in accordance with the procedures specified in OTHER TERMS,
below.
.........
OTHER TERMS:

In this Agreement, "Customer's AOS" shall mean Customer's right to utilize
Authorized Overrun Service on Alliance by virtue of that agreement between
Customer and Alliance providing Customer with 51.1 MMcf per day of Alliance
firm capacity, but does not include Customer's right to utilize Authorized
Overrun Service that is announced as available to Customer after 9:00 am
Mountain Time on the Nomination Day; and

"Gas Day" has the meaning given to that term in the U.S. tariff for Alliance
pipeline.

"Nomination Day" means the business day immediately preceding a particular
Gas Day.

On each Nomination Day, by  9:00 am Mountain Time  Customer will advise
Company by telephone or voice mail whether Customer will deliver and sell
gas hereunder on the next Gas Day and the amount to be delivered in MMBtus .
That amount shall be the DCQ for the next Gas Day, in all other
circumstances the DCQ will be zero.  The decision to sell and deliver gas
hereunder shall be within Customer's sole discretion, however, Customer
agrees that it shall not utilize Customer's AOS to deliver gas to a buyer in
Chicago except to Company pursuant to this Agreement, provided that Customer
may utilize Customer's AOS for operational purposes such as and including
balancing its Alliance account.

Once DCQ for the next Gas Day has been determined as provided in the
preceding paragraph such gas shall be considered to be Tier 3 Firm Gas and
the Force Majeure provision of the Enfolio Spot General Terms and Conditions
shall not apply to such deliveries.

By 9:45 am Mountain Time on each Nomination Day  that the DCQ for the next
Gas Day is not zero, Company shall advise Customer in writing or via e-mail
of the contract numbers, associated gas volumes, and alternate downstream
pipelines, if any,  where it wishes to have the DCQ allocated on the next
Gas Day. If Company fails to provide such advice in respect of the entire
DCQ  by 9:45 am,  Company will be conclusively deemed to have allocated the
entire DCQ to Contract No. ______________.   Promptly thereafter, Customer
will place a nomination with Alliance in accordance with such allocation.

 -----Original Message-----
 From: Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com [SMTP:Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com]
 Sent: Monday, February 12, 2001 7:43 AM
 To: Kleiner, Michael
 Cc: Grant.Oh@enron.com
 Subject: RE:Enron/Crestar AOS purchase and sale agreement

 Michael,
      Grant Oh of the Calgary office seems to be okay with your
requested
 modification of the interrruptible spot confirm.  As such, please
prepare
 an amendment document to add your language as an Appendix to the
terms of
 the spot confirm, have it signed and forward to Grant Oh and myself
for
 approval.  Thereafter we will have it signed and by Enron and will
return a
 fully executed copy to you.

                     Grant Oh

                                          To:     Dan J
Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
                     02/12/2001           cc:     Barry
Tycholiz/NA/Enron@ENRON
                     07:33 AM             Subject:
RE:Enron/Crestar AOS purchase and
                                          sale agreement(Document
link: Dan J Hyvl)

 Dan, Bruce Kohrs of Keyspan left me a message this weekend with
respect to
 the schedule 'A' that they would like attached.  Assuming that the
central
 desk has agreed to the contents of schedule 'A' - and they have been
 involved in drafting this document - I don't see a lot of commercial
risk,
 especially given the lack of 'damages' in the event of any defaults
to
 schedule 'A'.  My understanding was that we would all work together
on a
 reasonable efforts basis to allow gas to flow daily.  They contents
of
 schedule 'A' and its true enforceability does not seem to really
change the
 spirit of the agreement.
 If they are really adamant about including the schedule 'A', and the
 central desk has reviewed and expressly agreed to its contents, then
I
 would not object to including the schedule 'A' as part of the
contract.

 Grant

 Dan J Hyvl
 02/02/2001 11:56 AM

 To:   Grant Oh/CAL/ECT@ECT
 cc:
 Subject:  RE:Enron/Crestar AOS purchase and sale agreement

 Grant,
      Now they want us to consider it.
 ----- Forwarded by Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT on 02/02/2001 11:55 AM -----

             "Kleiner, Michael"

             <Michael.Kleiner@Crestar-Energy.co        To:
"'Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com'"
             m>
<Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com>
                                                       cc:
"Kohrs, Bruce" <Bruce_Kohrs@gulf.ca>
             02/02/2001 11:22 AM                       Subject:
RE:Enron/Crestar AOS purchase and
                                                      sale agreement

 Attn: Mr. Dan J. Hvyl

 We are wondering if you received our fax of January 30, 2001 and if
so
 whether you have had an opportunity to consider it.

 Gulf Canada Resources Limited

 Per: Michael Kleiner,  Law Department
 (403) 233-3330


Sara Shackleton
Enron Wholesale Services
1400 Smith Street, EB3801a
Houston, TX  77002
Ph:  (713) 853-5620
Fax: (713) 646-3490


<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">

<BASE HREF="http://football291.fantasy.sportsline.com/mp/">

Attention Fantasy Members! It's time to get an early start on that New Year's resolution. MVP.com is offering FREE Standard Shipping in our Fitness Shop until 1/17/02. Click here to see what we have to offer.

Save $.05 a gallon on the gas that keeps your car's engine clean. Click here to apply online.

Win a VIP Vegas Vacation! OR Win $600 CASH!

Brought to you by

<MAP NAME="menu.map">
<AREA shape="rect" coords="0, 1, 83, 25"
href="http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/1/217/sffer1228e.cgi">

<AREA shape="rect" coords="83, 1, 166, 25"
href="http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/1/226/sffer1228c.cgi">

<AREA shape="rect" coords="166, 1, 249, 25"
href="http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/1/223/sffer1228v.cgi">

<AREA shape="rect" coords="249, 1, 332, 25"
href="http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/1/163/sffer1228t.cgi">

<AREA shape="rect" coords="332, 1, 415, 25"
href="http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/5/3/sffer1227ftl.cgi">

</MAP>

You are receiving these e-reports because you have signed up for
    CBS SportsLine.com Fantasy Football.  To customize, reschedule,
    or turn off these reports please
    click here

NFL Reports, Player Updates

Latest NFL Player News

Steve McNair, QB TEN - Houston Big Ballers Updated 12/27/01
McNair missed practice Wednesday because of back pain.   "I'm going to try to do some things tomorrow and hope it loosens up and not have as much pain as I had today," McNair said.   "I'm not going to go out and try to force the issue. If it's still sore and still tight where I can't have all my mechanics right, I'm not going to force the issue."     The Titans listed him as questionable yet again Wednesday, but McNair likely will play

Jerome Bettis
, RB PIT - Blue Balls Updated 12/27/01
Bettis is still listed as questionable for Sunday's game against the Cincinnati Bengals after missing Pittsburgh's last three games with a groin injury.   He skipped Wednesday's practice, as he has done most of the season, even when healthy.   "I can't really predict the future, so I take it day by day," Bettis said. "I'm not 100 percent yet. I just want to keep improving and take it day by day."

Martin Gramatica, K TB - Free Agent Updated 12/27/01

Gramatica sat out practice Wednesday, but is expected to test his injured leg on Thursday. Doug Brien and Brad Daluiso worked out Wednesday for the Buccaneers, who might sign one if Martin Gramatica can't kick against the Baltimore Ravens this week.

Matt Hasselbeck, QB SEA - Texas Terminators Updated 12/26/01
Trent Dilfer will start this week in place of Hasselbeck, whose separated left shoulder is too sore for him to play.    Coach Mike Holmgren said Wednesday that Hasselbeck aggravated the injury, which he's had since the third week of the season, against the New York Giants last Sunday.   "There's a chance I might have him and he could play in an emergency-type situation, but he's pretty sore," Holmgren said.

James Stewart, RB DET - Orange Roughy Updated 12/26/01
Stewart is day to day with a sprained ankle. His status for this week's game is unclear.

Jeff Graham, WR SD - Really Rottens Updated 12/26/01
Graham may miss his second consecutive game this week because of the death of his father. With Tim Dwight (lung) still ailing, Trevor Gaylor may have to start again.

Skip Hicks
, RB TEN - Grid Iron Goons Updated 12/26/01
Hicks is expected to miss this week's game with a hamstring injury, and may miss the rest of the season. Eddie George should assume a regular workload once again.

Emmitt Smith, RB DAL - Team Dick Updated 12/26/01
Smith is day to day with a hip injury. He is expected to play this week.

Peter Warrick, WR CIN - Dont Mess Updated 12/26/01

Warrick, who was benched late in last week's game, is expected to start. He has been a disappointment this year and Fantasy players should not use him at this point of the postseason.

Todd Bouman, QB MIN - Grid Iron Goons Updated 12/26/01
Bouman (thumb) may attempt to practice late in the week. His status remains unclear for this week's game, and Spergon Wynn is available to start if needed.

Wesley Walls, TE CAR - Team Chick Updated 12/26/01
Walls is day to day with a knee injury. He should be able to play this week.

Muhsin Muhammad, WR CAR - Free Agent Updated 12/26/01
Muhammad is still battling a turf toe injury. His status for Week 16 is still unclear.

Larry Parker, WR KC - Luccis Losers Updated 12/26/01
Parker's season is over. He will undergo surgery on his shoulder and the Chiefs are expected to place him on injured reserve.

Oronde Gadsden, WR MIA - Team Dick
Updated 12/26/01
Gadsden (hamstring) might miss his second consecutive game this week. Chris Chambers may start in his place again.

Fred Taylor, RB JAC - Dont Mess Updated 12/26/01
Taylor (groin) has returned to practices and is working with the scout team. He might appear in the team's final game, and is a longshot to play this week. He has missed too much playing time to warrant serious Fantasy consideration at this point of the playoffs.

Rod Smith, WR DEN - Blue Balls Updated 12/26/01

Smith (ankles) has returned to practice. He is expected to play this week.

Raghib Ismail, WR DAL - C-Dawg's Boyz Updated 12/26/01
Ismail is recovering from a mild concussion. He is expected to play this week.

Joey Galloway, WR DAL - Team Chick Updated 12/26/01
Galloway is day to day with a hip injury. He is expected to play this week.

Bert Emanuel, WR DET - Blue Balls Updated 12/26/01
Emanuel is day to day with an ankle injury. His status for the upcoming week is unclear right now.

James McKnight, WR MIA - Luccis Losers Updated 12/26/01
McKnight is day to day with an ankle injury. He is expected to play this week.

Mark Brunell, QB JAC - President Taft Updated 12/26/01
Brunell is day to day with a quadriceps injury. He is expected to play this week.

Mike McMahon, QB DET - Free Agent Updated 12/26/01
McMahon may miss some practice time this week with a foot injury. His status for this week's game is unclear right now, and Ty Detmer will start in his place if he can't play.

Jason Brookins, RB BAL - Free Agent Updated 12/26/01
Brookins may be able to return for Baltimore's final game. For now, Terry Allen and Moe Williams will continue to split carries.

Jerome Bettis, RB PIT - Blue Balls Updated 12/25/01
Bettis is listed as questionable for Week 16. However, he may be able to return to the Steelers' starting lineup. Bill Cowher said Bettis is progressing, and he will be used this week if healthy.

James Stewart, RB DET - Orange Roughy Updated 12/23/01
Stewart suffered a sprained ankle early in Sunday's game at Pittsburgh. He was replaced by Lamont Warren in the first quarter, and Stewart did not return.

Cameron Cleeland, TE NO - Luccis Losers Updated 12/23/01
Cleeland injured his Achilles tendon on Sunday. He is not expected to play again this season.

Ahman Green, RB GB - Free Agent Updated 12/23/01
Green left Sunday's game in the fourth quarter with labored breathing. He was replaced by Dorsey Levens.

Todd Bouman, QB MIN - Grid Iron Goons Updated 12/23/01

Bouman was able to start Sunday's game, but he re-injured his thumb in the first quarter and was replaced by Spergon Wynn.

Wesley Walls, TE CAR - Team Chick Updated 12/23/01
Walls was able to play in Sunday's game despite an ankle injury, but he left the game before halftime after spraining his left knee.

Martin Gramatica, K TB - Free Agent Updated 12/23/01

Gramatica injured his hamstring in the fourth quarter on Sunday. The Buccaneers may sign a free agent kicker to replace him in Week 16.

More Updates

Teams, Player News

Team Chick Player News

Joey Galloway, Reserve WR Updated 12/26/01

Galloway is day to day with a hip injury. He is expected to play this week.

Wesley Walls, Reserve TE Updated 12/26/01

Walls is day to day with a knee injury. He should be able to play this week.

Rich Gannon, Active QB Updated 12/21/01

Gannon has been a top-flight Fantasy QB this year. He will be a key player on many title teams, and should never be benched.

Kevin Dyson, Reserve WR Updated 12/21/01

Look for Dyson to be a decent No. 2 receiver during the Fantasy postseason. He might not score, but he should catch a few passes.

Randy Moss, Active WR Updated 12/21/01

Moss started off slow this season but has once again been one of the best wideouts. Don't hesitate to start him during your playoff run.

Hines Ward, Active WR Updated 12/21/01

Ward hasn't scored a lot of touchdowns this season but is among the league leaders in receptions. He should be an asset to your team for the rest of the season as a No. 2 wideout.

Terrell Owens, Active WR Updated 12/21/01

Owens (hip) returned to practice on Thursday. He is expected to play this week.

Tim Couch, Reserve QB Updated 12/21/01

Couch has been inconsistent this season. He is far too unreliable to be considered a starter during the Fantasy playoffs.

Tony Richardson, Reserve RB Updated 12/21/01

Richardson hasn't been a consistent scoring threat this year. Don't use him during the Fantasy playoffs.

Jerry Rice, Active WR Updated 12/16/01

Rice had a solid game against San Diego, posting six catches for 93 yards and a touchdown. Rice has once again become a solid Fantasy player in Oakland, and will help many owners during the Fantasy playoffs.

Tiki Barber, Active RB Updated 12/16/01

Barber compiled 130 scrimmage yards against Arizona, but he was held out of the end zone. Barber will continue to be a focal point of the Giants' offense, however, and will be a valuable player to have during the Fantasy playoffs.

Dwayne Carswell, Reserve TE Updated 12/14/01

Carswell has been an up-and-down player for Denver. He won't give Fantasy owners consistent production during the postseason.

Richie Anderson, Reserve RB Updated 12/13/01

Anderson is day to day to with a wrist injury. He is expected to play on Sunday.

Saints, Active DT Updated 11/29/01

Cornerback Kevin Mathis missed practice on Wednesday due to a neck injury. "I've been trying to play through it, but I think it has caught up with me," Mathis told the Times-Picayune. "I start out the game fine, but after about the second tackle, the pain comes back immediately." Mathis is questionable for Sunday's game against Carolina, which could be good news for Fantasy owners with Panther receivers on their roster.

Matt Stover, Active K Updated 10/25/01

Stover has a minor leg injury that will prevent him from kicking off but he will be able to kick field goals, according to published reports. The injury isn't considered serious but the Ravens are considering Steve Lindsey and Jaret Holmes as candidates to handle kickoffs.

Copyright 2001 Commissioner.COM Inc and SportsLine.com Inc.
Your site can be reached from http://fantasy.sportsline.com

FB10SP


see the attached resume below.  I don't know this guy but thought I'd pass it
along to you.
---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Neal/HOU/ECT on 07/20/2000 10:45 AM
---------------------------

Shawn Kilchrist@ENRON
07/20/2000 09:39 AM
To: Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Win Graham

This fellow may be of interest you.

Shawn

---------------------- Forwarded by Shawn Kilchrist/NA/Enron on 20/07/2000
15:38 ---------------------------

Cindy Justice@ECT
20/07/2000 08:31
To: Shawn Kilchrist/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Win Graham

At this point I think he's looking at trading opportunities.

Shawn Kilchrist@ENRON
07/20/2000 02:46 AM
To: Cindy Justice/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Win Graham

Is he only interested in trading work or would he be interested in some
controls work?

SK

Cindy Justice@ECT
07/19/2000 01:56 PM
To: Shawn Kilchrist/NA/Enron@Enron, Roger Ondreko/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Win Graham

I thought I might pass this along your way to see if you had any ideas or
know of any needs. Win Graham used to work at C&L and looking for trading
opportunities at Enron. He's not interested the associate program at this
time.

His employer doesn't know he's looking, but feel free to pass this along to
anyone who might have or know of a need.

From my exposure to him, he seemed like a great guy that would probably fit
in well at Enron. Very personable!

Hope things are going well for both of you!

Cindy
---------------------- Forwarded by Cindy Justice/HOU/ECT on 07/19/2000 01:53
PM ---------------------------

Win Graham <ESG@Vitol.com> on 07/19/2000 11:39:12 AM
To: "'cindy.justice@enron.com'" <cindy.justice@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Win Graham

It was good to talk to you again.  Thanks for passing this around.
Hopefully something good will come from it.

Win

 <<res.doc>>

 - res.doc


Let me know what you think...I may go do my "long" run on Sunday, if you're
doing one too, maybe we can meet for breakfast...


I still think an additional organizational announcement is necessary- I can
explain further when you so desire. Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron on 04/11/2001
04:20 PM ---------------------------

Richard Shapiro
04/11/2001 04:15 PM
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Enron Europe Regulatory Affairs Announcement

From: Enron Europe Office of the Chairman@ECT on 04/11/2001 05:37 AM
Please respond to Enron Europe Office of the Chairman
Sent by: Enron Europe General Announcement@ECT
To: ECT Asia Pacific, ECT Dubai, ECT Europe, Enron VPs and MDs 1, Enron VPs
and MDs 2, Enron Executive Committee
cc:

Subject: Enron Europe Regulatory Affairs Announcement

After nearly five years in London, Mark Schroeder will be returning to the US
on April 11th to join the North American Coal Business with responsibility
for origination in the utility sector.  Under Mark,s leadership, his team has
made significant contributions towards Enron Europe,s &first mover8 advantage
and its status as the leading new entrant in the liberalizing pan-European
energy markets.  We wish him well in his new commercial role.

With Mark,s departure, the day-to-day management of the Government &
Regulatory Affairs Department in Europe will rest with Peter Styles, Paul
Dawson, Paul Hennemeyer, and Doug Wood. Nick O,Day will continue in his
current leadership capacity in Japan.  Each of these five individuals and
their groups will now jointly report to the business heads and to Rick
Shapiro, in the Government & Regulatory Affairs team in Houston. Rick Shapiro
will continue to manage Government Affairs for the Americas.  While the team
members responsibilities will vary from time-to-time in response to shifting
commercial priorities, as well as the need to support other Enron Wholesale
Services' business units from time-to-time, the general areas of
responsibility will be as follows:

Peter Styles, based in Brussels, will continue to have responsibility for our
EU and Netherlands advocacy.  Paul Hennemeyer will lead efforts in the German
speaking countries (Germany, Austria, Switzerland) as well as France and
Belgium. Peter and Paul will report to Eric Shaw.  While seconded to the
commercial team in France, Philip Davies will address Nordic market issues on
an ad hoc basis and also report to Paul on these issues.

Paul Dawson will lead our UK, Spain and Italian power regulatory efforts as
well as the gas regulatory work in the UK.  Doug Wood will support the
Continental Gas team and the Central and Southeastern Europe Origination
efforts, while also addressing the UK Climate Change Levy.  Doug's role in
gas will continue to be supplement, and not to supplant, the efforts of each
of the team members' geographic responsibilities noted on the organisation
chart. Paul and Doug will report to Richard Lewis locally.

Nick O,Day will also continue to report to Joe Hirl in Japan.

Other regulatory support provided by Mark Schroeder will be addressed in
another organizational announcement that will be sent
out from Government & Regulatory Affairs in Houston.  Attached is the revised
organization chart that now reflects the Government & Regulatory Affairs
organization in Enron Europe.

John Sherriff & Michael Brown

Please click on the link below to view the Regulatory Affairs organisational
charts for Europe and Japan.

Link to organisational charts


---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT on 04/03/2001
08:00 AM ---------------------------

"Matt Lenhart" <mlenhart@houston.rr.com> on 04/03/2001 05:49:36 AM
To: <matthew.lenhart@enron.com>
cc:

Subject:

?
 - Jay-Z - I Just Wanna Love U.mp3


Unbelievable!!  I guess he has sour grapes.  We only paid him not to apply for a job -- unfortunately, insults were not contemplated in our agreement.  Ignore him.  Michelle

-----Original Message-----
From: Reck, Daniel
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 3:27 PM
To: Cash, Michelle; Funkhouser, Shanna
Subject: FW:

Didn't we pay this guy to go away.  How can we make him stay there?

dan

-----Original Message-----
From: CJEWELL@prodigy.net [mailto:CJEWELL@prodigy.net]
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 10:57 AM
To: Reck, Daniel
Subject:

WOW Enron stock at $11.10 per share are you buying??
It has been a year since I was escorted out of the
Enron building by security because I did not fit the
Enron culture.  WHAT BULLSHIT.

You actually did me a favor and I am doing great,
however I still think you are a prick.

Charlie

ps I never did hear anything about a rail
transportation trading platform, did it happen?


Mark,

We have identified an issue in the UK whereby we could sell an Option for Q3
(for example), which is really three 1-month options (July,Aug, Sept.). The
option lanaguage needs to be clear that in the case of an option which has
multiple election dates, the premium is paid up front for the set of options,
but the payments which result from option settlement occur in each month
during the option period.

Justin and Edmund have suggested the attached. Do you want to modify the U.S.
product descriptions in a similar way?

Dave
---------------------- Forwarded by David Forster/LON/ECT on 14/09/99 15:36
---------------------------

Louise Kitchen
06/09/99 23:36
To: David Forster/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Weather Derivatives - Enron Online Market Description

---------------------- Forwarded by Louise Kitchen/LON/ECT on 06/09/99 23:39
---------------------------

Shari Stack
03/09/99 22:57
To: Awais Omar/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lynda Clemmons/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven
Vu/HOU/ECT@ECT, Louise Kitchen/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark - ECT Legal
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Weather Derivatives - Enron Online Market Description

As per the request in your email today, attached please find a revised
version of the Market Description for Weather Derivatives. I have run it by
Lynda Clemmons and Steven Vu on our Weather Desk so consider the attached
version approved by ENA Legal and Commercial.

Kind regards,

Shari Stack
(Attorney for the Weather Derivatives Desk)


i need to sleep.  i am worn out from denver.  i just went golfing and
drinking in denver.  it was fun but now i am tired.  i need to save some
money b/c i am going to vegas next weekend.  when is your cruise?


Fine!

Dale Neuner on 08/12/99 10:03:32 AM
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jeff Harbert/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Irving Pulp and Paper

Here's the last, and hopefully final, version.

Jeff - go ahead and do you review so when Sara okays these I can get them
back to Chris Calger quickly.


I found the partially executed NDA on my desk yesterday.  I thought it was a
copy, but it must be the original.  I'll mail it to you, Tana, and then you
can send us back a fully executed copy.

From:  Lorraine Becker
     05/31/2000 09:14 AM

To: Michael Danielson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Yahoo Non-Disclosure Agreement

see below.  who's the contact - I can call
---------------------- Forwarded by Lorraine Becker/HOU/ECT on 05/31/2000
10:14 AM ---------------------------
From: Tana Jones on 05/31/2000 09:10 AM
To: Lorraine Becker/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Yahoo Non-Disclosure Agreement

Lorraine, Mike is wrong.  I never got the fax of the executed NDA.  May he
could call his contact at the company and get them to send it to me?!

	Lorraine Becker
	05/31/2000 06:43 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Yahoo Non-Disclosure Agreement

Tana -

May I get a copy of this?  Our fax number is 713-646-2308 or my location is
EB2642B.  Please advise on how you will send so I can be on the "look-out".

Thanks!

Lorraine

---------------------- Forwarded by Lorraine Becker/HOU/ECT on 05/31/2000
06:38 AM ---------------------------

Michael Danielson
05/25/2000 10:58 AM
To: Lorraine Becker/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Yahoo Non-Disclosure Agreement

Yahoo signed this nondisclsure agreement.  And fax'd it back to Tana Jones.
Will you call Tana, make sure we executed the document and fax'd back to
Yahoo, and get a copy for our files.  We also need to set-up and new file for
Yahoo.

Thanks...

---------------------- Forwarded by Michael Danielson/HOU/ECT on 05/25/2000
10:54 AM ---------------------------
From: Tana Jones on 05/24/2000 03:06 PM
To: davidt@yahoo-inc.com
cc: Michael Danielson/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Yahoo Non-Disclosure Agreement

At the request of Mike Danielson, I am attaching our form of NDA.  If you
have any questions please do not hesitate to call me at (713) 853-3399 (fax
no 713/646-3490) or Mike at (713) 853-9052.  We look forward to hearing from
you.