Happy Birthday!!
What did you get?

DG

---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 04/25/2001
08:16 AM ---------------------------

"hollyw" <hollyw@email.msn.com> on 04/24/2001 03:32:58 PM
To: "Gary Wright" <wrightgr@udmercy.edu>, "Stacy Warren"
<swarre02@coair.com>, "Stan & Katie Wright" <stanchas@aol.com>, "Sheri
Thomas" <Sheri.Thomas@enron.com>, "Rochelle Smith"
<rochelle@waterengineers.com>, "Mom&Dad\(Lake\) \(E-mail\)"
<rjones@mcia.com>, <KSowada@aol.com>, "KRISTI GIRON"
<KRISTI.GIRON@cfisd.net>, "kristiandjoel" <kandjhenness@webtv.net>, "Ron
Jones" <jonesr@tpi-sourcing.com>, "John Schmitz"
<john.schmitz@rlxtechnologies.com>, "Debbie Hall" <gmind@icsi.net>, "Charlene
Anderson" <foxter@rionet.com.br>, "Diego Gotthelf" <dygotthelf@hotmail.com>,
"Dana Smith" <dsmith@s3ccpa.com>, "Darron C Giron"
<Darron.C.Giron@enron.com>, "Quais" <catherine_morse@amat.com>
cc:
Subject: Holly 48

Stacy, I see you as more of an over 60, except for the admiration part.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Warren, Stacy" <swarre02@coair.com>
To: "Mom&Dad(Lake) (E-mail)" <rjones@mcia.com>; "Ugly Boo (E-mail)"
<hollyw@email.msn.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 2:19 PM
Subject: I Rule - 51

This is a fun diversion.

Take this test for yourself...and send it to your friends, including me, and
let them know who you are. My score is in the subject box... Don't peek but
begin the test as you scroll down and answer.

Answers are for who you are now...not who you were in the past.   Have pen
or pencil and paper ready.   This is a real test given by the Human
Relations Dept at many of  the major corporations today. It helps them get a
better insight concerning their employees and potential employees.

It's only 10 simple questions, so...  Grab a pencil and paper, keeping track
of your letter answers.   Make sure you change the subject of the e-mail to
read YOUR total. When you are finished, forward this to everyone you know,
and also send  it to the person who sent this to you.

Make sure to put YOUR score in the subject box.  Ready?? Begin...

1. When do you feel your best?
 a) in the morning
 b) during the afternoon & early evening
 c) late at night

2. You usually walk
 a) fairly fast, with long steps
 b) fairly fast, with short, quick steps
 c) less fast head up, looking the world in the face
 d) less fast, head down
 e) very slowly

3. When talking to people you
 a) stand with your arms folded
 b) have your hands clasped
 c) have one or both your hands on your hips
 d) touch or push the person to whom you are talking
 e) play with your ear, touch your chin, or smooth
your hair

4. When relaxing, you sit with
 a) your knees bent with your legs neatly side by side
 b) your legs crossed
 c) your legs stretched out or straight
 d) one leg curled under you

5. When something really amuses you, you react with
 a) a big, appreciative laugh
 b) a laugh, but not a loud one
 c) a quiet chuckle
 d) a sheepish smile

6. When you go to a party or social gathering you..
 a) make a loud entrance so everyone notices you
 b) make a quiet entrance, looking around for someone
you know
 c) make the quietest entrance, trying to stay
unnoticed

7. You're working very hard, concentrating hard, and
you're interrupted. Do you..
 a) welcome the break
 b) feel extremely irritated
 c) vary between these two extremes

8. Which of the following colors do you like most?
 a) red or orange
 b) black
 c) yellow or light blue
 d) green
 e) dark blue or purple
 f) white
 g) brown or gray

9. When you are in bed at night, in those last few
moments before going to sleep, you lie

 a) stretched out on your back
 b) stretched out face down on your stomach
 c) on your side, slightly curled
 d) with your head on one arm
 e) with your head under the covers

10. You often dream that you are
 a) falling
 b) fighting or struggling
 c) searching for something or somebody
 d) flying or floating
 e) you usually have dreamless sleep
 f) your dreams are always pleasant

POINTS:
 1. (a) 2
     (b) 4
     (c) 6

 2. (a) 6
     (b) 4
     (c) 7
     (d) 2
     (e) 1

3. (a) 4
 (b) 2
 (c) 5
 (d) 7
 (e) 6

4. (a) 4
 (b) 6
 (c) 2
 (d) 1

5. (a) 6
 (b) 4
 (c) 3
 (d) 5
 (e) 2

6. (a) 6
 (b) 4
 (c) 2

7. (a) 6
 (b) 2
 (c) 4

8. (a) 6
 (b) 7
 (c) 5
 (d) 4
 (e) 3
 (f) 2
 (g) 1

9. (a) 7
 (b) 6
 (c) 4
 (d) 2
 (e) 1

 10.(a) 4
 (b) 2
 (c) 3
 (d) 5
 (e) 6
 (f) 1

Now add up the total number of points.
OVER 60 POINTS:
Others see you as someone they should "handle with
care." You're  seen
as
vain, self-centered, and who is extremely dominant.
Others may admire
you,
wishing they could be more like you, but don't always
trust you,
hesitating to become too deeply involved with you.

 51 TO 60 POINTS:
Others see you as an exciting, highly volatile, rather
impulsive
personality; a natural leader, who's quick to take
decisions,  though not
always the  right ones. They see you as bold and
adventuresome, someone
who will try anything once; someone who takes chances
and enjoys an
adventure.  They enjoy being in your company because
of the excitement you
radiate.

41 TO 50 POINTS:
Others see you as fresh, lively, charming, amusing,
practical, and
always interesting; someone who's constantly in the
center of attention,
but sufficiently well-balanced not to let it go to
their head. They also
see you as kind, considerate, and understanding;
someone who'll always
cheer  them up and help them out.

31 TO 40 POINTS:
Others see you as sensible, cautious, careful &
practical. They see you
as clever, gifted, or talented, but modest... Not a
person who makes
friends too quickly or easily, but someone who's
extremely loyal to
friends you do make and who expect the same loyalty in
return. Those who
really get to  know you realize it takes a lot to
shake your trust in your
friends, but equally that it takes you a long time to
get over it if
that trust is ever broken.

21 TO 30 POINTS:
Your friends see you as painstaking and fussy. They
see you as very
cautious, extremely careful, a slow and steady
plodder. It'd really
surprise them if you ever did something impulsively or
on the spur of the
moment,  expecting you to examine everything carefully
from every angle
and then, usually decide against it. They think this
reaction is caused
partly by your careful nature.

UNDER 21 POINTS:
People think you are shy, nervous, and indecisive,
someone who needs
looking after, who always wants someone else to make
the decisions & who
doesn't want to get involved with anyone or anything.
They see you as a
worrier who always sees problems that don't exist.
Some people think
you're boring. Only those who know you well know that
you aren't.

Now forward this on to everyone you know, making sure
to put YOUR score
in the subject box.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices
http://auctions.yahoo.com/


Professor Ronn:
Thank you for your reply.  I have a meeting at 9:00 am, but I am free from
10:00 am to 1:00 am.  If you could let me know what the best time for me to
stop by your office I would appreciate it.  I look forward to meeting you
tomorrow.

Ben Rogers


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 07/26/2000
11:09 AM ---------------------------

"Wichai Narongwanich" <wichai@engin.umich.edu> on 07/16/2000 11:12:23 PM
To: "Vincent Kaminski" <vkamins@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Paper

Dear Dr. Kaminski,

The attachment is my PDF version of my paper. Please let me know if you have
any difficulty receiving the file.

Sincerely,
Wichai

----------------------------------------------
Wichai Narongwanich
Ph.D. Candidate, IOE Dept.
Research Assistant, MEAM Dept.
University of Michigan
----------------------------------------------

 - paper1revFinal.pdf


See changes proposed to Q&A.... still working.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Denne, Karen
Sent:	Saturday, October 13, 2001 1:03 PM
To:	Palmer, Mark A. (PR); Kean, Steven J.
Subject:	3Q earnings messages

 << File: THIRD QUARTER EARNINGS KEY THEMES.doc >>


request_number:  DS-WA:015
firstname:  Terry
lastname:  Mundorf
e-mail:  terrym@millcreeklaw.com
exhibit_wp-02-e-:  JGC-01, 02
page_numbers:
request_text:  :  Please disclose and/or produce copies of any and all
communications, from October 16, 2000 to the present, between any BPA
representative and any representative of any other party, concerning any of
the following subjects:

 a. The general structure of the Cost Recovery Adjustment Clauses (CRACs)
described in the testimony of the Joint Customers;

 b. Any differences between the form of the CRACs described in the testimony
of the Joint Customers and the CRACs contained in BPA's Amended Proposal, or
those contained in BPA's Supplemental Proposal;

 c. The detailed mechanics of implementing the CRACs described in the
testimony of the Joint Customers;

 d. Revenue effects of the CRACs described in the testimony of the Joint
Customers, any modifications; or

 e. Any aspect of the Partial Stipulation and Settlement Agreement and the
Parties' Proposal attached thereto.

For purposes of this Request, "disclose and/or produce" has the meanings
described below.  With respect to oral communications, "disclose and/or
produce" means to describe the time, date, approximate duration, and
substantive content of the communication; the identity and organizational
affiliation of the communicating individuals; whether the communication
occurred in person or by telephone; the location of the communication if in
person; the identity of any witnesses to the communications, including all
individuals in the room if the communication occurred by speakerphone; and
whether the communication was made in the presence of or after coordination
with BPA counsel (if so, identify such counsel).  For purposes of this
Request, you need not "disclose and/or produce" oral communications that
occurred during meetings noticed in compliance with Rate Case Rule 1010.7(d).

With respect to written communications, the Request includes communications
in any recorded form, whether on paper, electronic (including, without
limitation, e-mails), or whatever form.  For such communications, "disclose
and/or produce" means to provide copies of all non-identical versions of any
written communications and to describe with particularity the location where
such communications were found and/or stored, including the identity of the
individual with possession or control of the written communications; to
describe with particularity the circumstances under which they were generated
or referred to; and to fully "disclose and/or produce" any oral
communications made in connection with the written communications consistent
with the preceding paragraph.  For purposes of this Request, you need not
produce papers served on all parties to the rate case and made part of the
official file in the rate case.

response_text:
Exhibit 1 reflects e-mails currently on file. The computer of Terry Mundorf
suffered a virus attack on or about 2/15/01, which corrupted the Outlook
program.  In order to repair the damage, all incoming e-mail was purged on or
about 2/20/01, which eliminated records of incoming e-mail prior to that date.

WPAG has no records of meetings or telephone calls that requested in
DS-WA:015-017, so the information contained in Exhibit 2 is based on best
recollection.

For written communications, see Exhibit 1.
For oral communications, see Exhibit 2.

The exhibits and attachments are available in BPA's Data Response Room.

The following information is from the web server:
1.  Logon: IUSR_GRANITE
2.  Remote Host:  router.millcreeklaw.com
3.  Remote IP Address:  204.57.181.3
4.  Form URL:
https://secure.bpa.gov/power/secure/psp/ratecase/discovery/wp_02_response.html
5.  Browser Client:  Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.01; Windows 95)


We need to communicate with Massey before he gets completely carried away
blaming the interstate pipeline business for gas price spikes.  We need to
get him the information regarding Cal LDCs failure to fill storage and their
opposition to additional pipeline construction in the state.  Shelley --
could you forward copies of the LDC filings to the group.  Should Joe or I
(or both) try to see massey when I am in town next week?
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 04/26/2001
02:07 PM ---------------------------
From: Jeff Dasovich on 04/24/2001 06:57 PM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, skean@enron.com, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Leslie
Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rob
Bradley/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Janel Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Karen
Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enro@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Some Background on California Gas Price Spikes--The Other Side of
the Story

Last week, I distributed a presentation that the Brattle Group gave before
the California Inquisition (i.e., legislative gas oversight committee looking
into the gas price spikes at the Cal border).

The Brattle Group is a consulting firm that Edison has long used to beat up
on SoCalGas (recall that Edison used to be a big gas customer when it owned
power plants).  Edison "arranged" for the Brattle Group to be the star
witness at the Cal Leg gas hearing.  Their job was to set up El Paso and
Dynegy for the hit at hearings that took place the following day.  Their
message was simple (and simplistic):

El Paso and Dynegy have market power.
They have used the market power to drive up basis and thus the price of gas
at the border (to "obscene" levels).
That, in turn, has driven up electricity prices.

Ken Lay is giving a gas talk tomorrow, and Rob Bradley asked that I provide
the alternative view to the Edison/Brattle rant, in the event that he gets
any questions on the topic.  It's attached.  Apologies, it's quick and dirty,
but it provides the basics.

Obviously no need for us to defend El Paso or Dynegy, but might be useful to
offer a more rationale explanation than the one that the California
Legislature is peddling.

Finally, we were also fingered somewhat as culprits at the hearing (the
California PUC FERC lawyer claimed that ENA and TW colluded to drive up basis
when ENA controlled a portion of  the capacity), but the overriding goal of
the hearing was to go after EP and Dynegy.

Best,
Jeff


Dr. Kaminski, I would like to thank you very much for taking care of Amy and
me
during our trip to Houston. What I saw at Enron Communication was nothing
short
of revolutionary. More than that, I was impressed with the drive of the
people,
their kindness, and their proficiency. I look forward to meeting you again in
Stanford during the last weekend of February. I will send you an email next
week, so that we can arrange a meeting between you and Prof. Bambos.
All the best wishes,

Giuseppe

--
::Giuseppe A Paleologo::                  http://www.stanford.edu/~gappy
________________________________________________________________________
"What a waste it is to lose one's mind. Or not to have a mind is being
very wasteful. How true that is."

    - Vice President Dan Quayle winning friends while
      speaking to the United Negro College Fund, 5/9/89 -


Can't remember at this point what the question was!  Thanks for following up
-- I will call you if I remember.  --Sally

Rebecca Ford
07/26/2000 05:20 PM
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Question

Hi Sally,

The other day you stopped by my desk to ask me a question, but then you had
to leave suddenly.  Did you still need to ask me something?  I just wanted to
follow up with you.

Thank you,
Becky


We are currently experiencing issues with EHR online. We are aware of these issues and are working to get them resolved quickly. Thank you for your patience and we will notify you when the EHR system is back online.

Thank you,

ETS Solution Center - Houston, at 713-345-4745
ETS Solution Center - Omaha, at 402-398-7454


Winfield Tchnology will be here tommorrow to demo their software from 2-3:30
p.m. in room 3127 the big room next to T.Jae.  Your presence is appreciated.
Jeff Miller saw the demo two weeks ago and suggested that we atleast look at
it.

Thanks
Kayne


Thanks Kay. I'll call you Monday. Have a nice holiday.

Ben

Kay Mann@ENRON
04/12/2001 06:28 PM
To: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Booth/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: NW

We had our daily phone call with NW.  I don't know that we really have
significant  points of disagreement.  They understand that we are working
some accounting issues, and they have a general idea of what we want to do.
I suggested that we come up with the work arounds with our accountants, and I
will think about it this weekend.  I have a couple of ideas but I really want
to mull it over.

They look forward to receiving the turbine contract.  Chris, could you
forward the draft change orders with it?

One point they raised is that they want the ability (with GE consent) to have
us refund the future payment due to GE (less 7% for time value of money),
retaining the payment obligation.  All of this is post closing.  They are
putting up a full blown parent guaranty to GE for the turbine contract, and
since the payment should only be around $4mm, that would probably be
acceptable to GE.

Keffer et al will issue revised documents tonight.  There are no calls
scheduled tomorrow or this weekend, giving everyone "quiet time" to review
the contract.  Other than the accting issues, this should be about it.

We deferred discussions about an extension until Monday.

Kay


Daily Blessing
Joyful Moments
http://www.daily-blessings.com/bless101.htm

Visit Christmas greetings at
http://www.debsfunpages.com/christmas.htm

I just found a really neat site that I hope you'll all check out.  With the
holidays coming up it has a great idea for that person you don't know what to
get...but someone you think is the greatest.  It's called Unsung Hero and I
know we all have one of those in our lives..check this out and see what they
have to offer.  I ordered one today!!

http://www.daily-blessings.com/cjunsunghero.htm

Hundred's of you have taken advantage of the free download available for the
Work From Home folks.  If you haven't checked it out yet...you should!!

http://www.daily-blessings.com/cjworkfromhome.htm

<<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>>
* To remove yourself from this mailing list, point your browser to:
http://inbound.postmastergeneral.com/remove?dailyblessings:10
* Enter your email address (judy.hernandez@enron.com) in the field
provided and click "Unsubscribe". The mailing list ID is "dailyblessings:10".

OR...

* Reply to this message with the word "remove" in the subject line.

This message was sent to address judy.hernandez@enron.com
X-PMG-Recipient: judy.hernandez@enron.com
<<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>>


Welcome to all of the new Enron Kids volunteers, and thanks to all of the veteran Enron Kids volunteers. We will hold our next Enron Kids meeting on:

	Thursday, July 19, 2001
	11:30 am - 1:00 pm	(feel free to bring your lunch)
	EB 47C2

Agenda:
	I.	Burrus School (2000 Enron Kids Pgm) Final Update

	II.	Gordon School (2001 Enron Kids Pgm) Update

	III.	Review Timeline & To Do's for 2001 Enron Kids Program

	IV.	Review & Revise Enron Kids Forms (if you have any of the forms we used last year stored in your directory of 	files, please forward to Geneva Davis or myself so we can keep a master file of all forms)


Rick -- As I mentioned earlier, I had the exit interview with Joe Allen last
week.  I received the following questions from Geriann today, but I think the
questions are something that you should probably answer.  He currently has
his contract which he has not yet signed, but I'll remind him I need no later
than next week in order to pay his lump sum severance.

Please let me know if you'd like for me to work with him on these issues,
with your guidance:

Joe Allen would like a copy of his contract.    <He still has the two
originals of his contract>

We need to know who to handle the following expenses:

1. Can he put Austin Club dues on his expense report?

2.  Can he put his parking expenses on his expense report?

3.  Cell Phone?

4.  Subscription to newsletters and magazines?

Thanks, Geriann

Thanks.
Jo Ann


Well, we met and had dinner last night.  NOTHING of importance was discussed
during our entire meal and it was only when I brought things up as we were
leaving that any actual talking occurred.  Here are the basics...

- There is definitely no "us" anymore...and I quote "sometimes these things
just fade out"
- There is much I didn't know about him and I am sure even more that I still
don't
- Case in point...He was MARRIED before (yes, you read correctly married)
- Turns out he's been divorced about three years, it didn't end well and he
hasn't had a relationship that has lasted beyond       2 mos. in those three
years (even though, by his own admission, he has dated a lot) - Can you say
issues?
- He told me "I know this sounds so trite, but this really has nothing to do
with you, it's all me."  Of course I agreed with him saying "I know it's you
Ted, I don't have any problems." (He got a chuckle out of that one)
- I told him about my frustrations and disappointment with how he had handled
things and he apologised (evidently Kevin told him about our exchange at
Steak Night) and I also let him know how much I appreciated his handling of
things in the beginning
- I said I really hated animosity and hard feelings and that as long as he
hadn't done anything truly horrible to me (i.e. murder a family member, etc.)
I would really like to leave things on a good note...He agreed.
- He said I was a fantastic girl and that he still enjoyed hanging out and
talking with me (although I don't see us doing a lot of that)

So all in all I walked away with three very important things 1. A lightened
load (I got everything of my chest that I wanted to and needed to) 2. My
dignity (I handled it just as I'd hoped...with composure and wit) 3. A
clearer since of Ted as a person (He definitely has a lot of issues in his
life he has not completely dealt with yet, and who knows if he ever will?)

Anyway, I'm okay with everything and surprisingly feel pretty good.  I'll
talk to you soon.

Susan

By the way, I told him about the shirt idea (he thought it was funny, and
maybe just a little harsh)


Attached are revised versions of the GTC's (both a clean version and a
version marked to show changes since last Friday's draft).  I will forward my
comments in respect of the long definition tomorrow - as I would like to make
my comments after speaking with Jay Hawthorn.  Please do not hesitate to
contact me should you have any questions or comments with regard to this
document.  Please note that I haven't yet heard anything from Dorn Hetzel -
in the event that I do, I will revise and try and turn the document tomorrow
afternoon.

Cynthia

	Leonardo Pacheco@ENRON
	04/25/00 06:42 PM

		 To: Cynthia Harkness/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc:
		 Subject: EnronOnline ETA

Attached please find ETA


I will be there.

Grigsby

-----Original Message-----
From: Arnold, John
Sent: Sat 10/27/2001 1:21 PM
To: Shively, Hunter S.; Neal, Scott; Grigsby, Mike; Martin, Thomas A.
Cc:
Subject:

There will be a desk head mtg tomorrow, Sunday, at 3:00 on the 33rd floor per Lavorato to discuss positions and strategy.  Please confirm via email.  My cell # is 713 557 3330 if there are any problems.


I have reviewed Tana's list of North American utilities and have the
following comments:

(1)  I have tried to eliminate all governmentals and regulated entities.
However, I suggest that we ask Kevin Leitao to take a quick review for
obvious errors.  (However, I don't want Kevin to prepare unlimited research
on our behalf.  I'll discuss with him).

(2)  I suggest that we ask Canadian counsel to review Canadian utilities on
authority/regulatory issues.  In my experience, Canadian outside counsel was
reluctant to even comment on utilities located in provinces other than
outside counsel's domicile.

(3)  The online omnibus does not contain the ISDA Section 3(c) rep as to
absence of litigation.  This rep drags in governmental bodies and all
agencies (hence, a state PUC).  Thus, online parties will rep as to authority
to transact each time they trade but we will not know about potential PUC
issues.  (Under the ISDA, a party would have to notifiy us of a "Regulatory
Development" and we may have an Event of Default for failure to notify; we
may also have a Termination Event under our current format).


900 am this am.  For your info.  Crazy day.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 12/20/2000 08:59
AM ---------------------------

Fred Mitro@ECT
12/20/2000 08:13 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Lisa Bills/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Herman
Manis/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Intergen meeting - this morning

It looks like 9 am works for everyone.  Let's meet in Kay's office on EB 38
(wooden door, left, outside wall office).

See you there.

Fred


Looking forward to playing at 600 on Wed, court 12.


Could you please send Tana the list of countries from which online trading of
derivatives with ECT is permissible.  She is trying to complete the
Counterparty spreadsheet for Louise.

Thanks!

Mark


When Jason was seconded over here he drafted an ISDA schedule for a SWAP with
Barclays. Heads up, I am sending the comments from Barclays over to you, and
have copied Rob Taylor at A&K. Ranabir Dutt is the business person.


Kevin,

The donuts are a great idea. I think we should add Jeff and John as well
(baskets).

Vince

Kevin G Moore
11/07/2000 11:14 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike A Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Christmas List

While the thought is still on my mind,so you want think I'm
being selfish .

What  I am thinking we could do is send the Move Team , Help Desk  and
Facilities

complimentary donuts from the Research Group during the holiday season.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kevin G Moore/HOU/ECT on 11/07/2000 12:07
PM ---------------------------

Kevin G Moore
11/07/2000 11:02 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike A Roberts/HOU/ECT@E
cc:
Subject: Re: Christmas List

I sent the last e- mail before asking this question .
Vince,
What about Dave Delainey, John Lavorato and Jeff Shankman.
Please inform................

Kevin G Moore
11/07/2000 10:57 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike A Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Christmas List

Hello Vince and Mike

I want to keep you informed.

This year all baskets will be done in a timely manner.
On last year we were going through a major move therefore
many people played key roles in keeping us together.
This year however , is a little different , as it is always nice
to give unfortunately we can not give to everyone.
I am sending a lists of who we have so far.

There are a few names on the list that  I feel we should do something else
for this year .
under Shirley's list of names.

(not so expensive)

They are : Move Team                                who?
                     Mail Room                                    who?
                     Facilities Help Desk                  who?

There are other tokens of appreciation that we can get for them.

Please note that you two are the only ones that have seen this e-mail so far
I will need your approval for all baskets, however your input on the matter
will be
greatly appreciated.The list is not completed I am still waiting for
additions.

                                              Thanks
                                                          Kevin Moore


US Supreme Court Term To Open With Heavy Business Docket
Dow Jones News Service, 09/24/01
USA: UPDATE 1-Sizing up CEO aplomb under duress a major concern.
Reuters English News Service, 09/24/01
USA: UPDATE 2-Calif. ISO, FERC, companies discuss refund issue.
Reuters English News Service, 09/24/01
NORWAY: Helsinki bourse to trade weather derivatives.
Reuters English News Service, 09/24/01
INDIA: Enron gets impatient as Indian unit's row lingers.
Reuters English News Service, 09/24/01
Northwest Power Sellers Shouldn't Pay Refunds, FERC Judge Says
Bloomberg, 09/24/01

US Supreme Court Term To Open With Heavy Business Docket
By Scott Ritter
Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES

09/24/2001
Dow Jones News Service
(Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)

WASHINGTON -(Dow Jones)- When the U.S. Supreme Court formally returns to work next Monday, the justices will face a docket chock full of disputes certain to leave a mark on America's businesses and workers.
Indeed, fully half of the 42 cases already selected for the high court's 2001-2002 term are business-related - "the largest number in at least nine years," notes Washington appellate attorney Roy T. Englert. Several deal with employment issues, while others will decide key questions in the high-stakes effort to deregulate the nations' electricity and telecommunications industries.
The docket also finds the court returning to the landmark 1995 Adarand decision involving minority preferences in government contracting. Other closely-watched cases involve the scope of federal patent-law protections, and statutes in many states that allow for independent review of treatment decisions made by health maintenance organizations.
Additional appeals - culled from the thousands of cases that crossed the justices' desks this summer - are expected to be added to the docket this week.
Return Of The ADA

A pair of cases will test anew the reach of the Americans With Disabilities Act, the 1990 statute that has prompted several significant Supreme Court interpretations in the last couple of years.
In Toyota vs. Williams, 00-1089, the justices will decide whether workers who can't perform some of their duties because of a limited impairment are "disabled" under the statute. Business groups like the National Association of Manufacturers worry that a lower court ruling in the case will force employers to accommodate workers who aren't really disabled.
The case involves former Toyota Motor Corp. (TM) employee Ella Williams, who was diagnosed with carpal tunnel syndrome and tendinitis while working as an engine builder at the company's Georgetown, Ky., plant in the early 1990s. She claims her ailment amounts to a disability, and says the company should accommodate her by giving her different duties.
A federal appeals court in Cincinnati, deeming Williams "disabled" under the statute, said her lawsuit could proceed.
In a second ADA case, the justices will use an appeal from US Airways Group Inc. (U) to clarify whether companies are required to accommodate disabled workers by moving them into jobs reserved for more senior employees. The Arlington, Va., carrier says moving customer service representative Robert Barnett to a less-demanding mailroom job would upset its seniority system. Barnett injured his back in 1990 while handling cargo at the San Francisco International Airport.
A federal appeals court in San Francisco ordered Barnett's case to trial, ruling that US Airways' seniority system - which wasn't based on a collective bargaining agreement - didn't bar his transfer to the mailroom. The case is US Airways vs. Barnett, 00-1250.
A Patent Bar 'In Disarray'

The justices will also wade into a pair of disputes over patent law, including one that's left the "patent bar completely in disarray," says Seth P. Waxman, a former solicitor general in the Clinton administration.
At issue in that case, Festo vs. Shoketsu Kinzoku, 00-1543, is a principle of the U.S. patent system, known as the "doctrine of equivalents," which says imitators cannot avoid patent infringement by simply making minor changes to a patented invention.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit settled the dispute by crafting new rules that make it tougher in many cases for inventors to invoke the doctrine's protections. Festo Corp., a unit of Germany's Festo AG, alleges that Japan's SMC Corp. copied - with minor modifications - its patented design for magnetic rodless cylinders.
Festo filed its suit in 1988, and won a series of judgments until last year, when the Federal Circuit ruled 8-4 that SMC hadn't infringed Festo's patents. "It's not too much say that the decision ... has dealt the patent system a crippling blow," says Robert H. Bork, a former federal judge who is representing Festo.
In J.E.M. Ag Supply vs. Pioneer, 99-1996, the justices will decide whether seeds and plants grown from seeds can be patented.
The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has issued utility patents on crops grown from seeds since 1985, and their validity was largely untested before 1998, when DuPont Co.'s (DD) Pioneer Hi-Bred International Inc. unit sued a Belmond, Iowa, farm-supply company for selling Pioneer-brand seed corn without its permission.
The supplier, Farm Advantage Inc., argues that Congress never intended utility patents to be awarded for plant varieties. Companies like DuPont have spent big money to modify seeds genetically and want to shield new varieties from copycats. The Federal Circuit agreed with Pioneer. The justices will hear arguments Oct. 3.
Deregulation Battles

Several appeals will force the high court to resolve some key disputes over efforts by federal regulators to open the nation's local telephone markets to competition. The Federal Communications Commission, long-distance carriers and local phone companies all found reason to disagree with a ruling last year from a federal appeals court in St. Louis.
The nation's high court has already waded into the murky waters of telecommunications deregulation, ruling that Congress in 1996 gave the FCC the authority to formulate the prices local carriers charge would-be rivals for access to their networks.
The appeals now before the justices arose from the same litigation, but this time focus on the FCC rules themselves rather than the agency's statutory authority. "This court's intervention is needed again," the government says. "This time the stakes are, if anything, even higher." The lead case is Verizon vs. FCC, 00-511. Arguments are set for Oct. 10.
The justices will also decide whether the FCC can set rates some cable television systems and wireless phone companies pay to string wires or hang antennas on electric poles. A federal appeals court in Atlanta nixed some of the FCC's rate-setting powers.
Power companies say the FCC overstepped its authority when it set "pole attachment" rates for cable companies that provide high speed Internet access over their lines. They also say Congress never intended for the agency to regulate rates charged to wireless providers who want to use their poles.
The cases, National Cable Television Association vs. Gulf Power, 00-832 and FCC vs. Gulf Power, 00-843, will be argued Oct. 2.
The justices will turn their attention the following day to the $215 billion electricity industry when it hears challenges to landmark federal rules requiring utilities to open their high-voltage power lines to competitors.
Several state regulators say the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission overreached when it issued Order 888 in 1996. Under the rules, utilities must provide access to their transmission lines to anyone buying or selling electricity in the interstate market. The rules were backed by a federal appeals court here last year.
The high court will also consider a separate appeal from Enron Corp.'s (ENE) power marketing unit, which argues that FERC didn't go far enough in exerting its jurisdiction over retail electricity sales. The cases are New York vs. FERC, 00-568 and Enron vs. FERC, 00-809.
'Like Ships Passing In The Night'

The upcoming term also finds the justices stepping into the contentious debate over patients' rights. In Rush Prudential HMO vs. Moran, 00-1021, the court will consider an Illinois law that allows independent review of HMO treatment decisions. Thirty-seven states and the District of Columbia have enacted similar measures.
Debra C. Moran sued her HMO to recover $94,841 she paid for surgery to correct a shoulder ailment. The HMO had recommended a less complicated and less costly surgical procedure and declined to pay even after an independent reviewing physician said Moran should receive the more expensive treatment.
A federal appeals court in Chicago, considering an appeal by a unit of Wellpoint Health Networks Inc. (WLP), upheld the statute. A similar statute in Texas, however, was rejected by a U.S. appeals court in New Orleans, which said it was trumped by the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act, which governs employee benefit plans.
The high court will also take another look at a retooled program that helps minority-owned and disadvantaged businesses land highway construction jobs. The appeal, Adarand vs. Mineta, 00-730, comes from a Colorado company that first challenged the Transportation Department program more than a decade ago after losing a bid to build guardrails on a federal road project.
In a landmark 1995 decision, the Supreme Court cast doubt on the program when it ruled that affirmative-action initiatives must be "narrowly tailored to remedy specific past discrimination." Congress and the Transportation Department have since taken several steps in hopes of making the road program fit within the high court's guidelines. With those changes in place, the program passed constitutional muster, a federal appeals court in Denver ruled last year.
"Amazingly, this case is a mess," says Waxman, the former solicitor general, who says there's a significant chance the justices may simply dismiss the case. The two sides are "like ships passing in the night," he says, with little or no agreement on even the basic facts of the dispute.
Supreme Court Web site: http://supremecourtus.gov
-By Scott Ritter, Dow Jones Newswires; 202-862-6687; scott.ritter@dowjones.com

Copyright ? 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

USA: UPDATE 1-Sizing up CEO aplomb under duress a major concern.

09/24/2001
Reuters English News Service
(C) Reuters Limited 2001.

(Adds more on why Skilling left Enron in paragraph 7, rewrites paragraphs 6, 20)
By Jamie LaReau
NEW YORK, Sept 24 (Reuters) - When Thomas Neff took over executive recruitment firm Spencer Stuart, little did he know he would soon be widowed and a single parent while running a rapidly growing worldwide company.
Neff, now chairman of Spencer Stuart, was an effective CEO from 1979 to 1987, though a personal tragedy and his company's rapid expansion made his job especially stressful.
"My wife died in 1985 and I had three young boys," Neff told Reuters. "It was stressful in that we quadrupled our revenues and doubled the number of offices in the world, so the travel load increased, so that just adds to stress."
Company boards are taking a long look at how executives cope with stress, and not just the anxiety of running a Fortune 500 company, as unforeseen events such as the loss of human life after the attacks on the World Trade Center can have enormous repercussions on a company.
Companies are looking for people like Neff who can handle a hectic schedule and enormous responsibility with grace and success, and will not unexpectedly leave the company.
On Aug. 14, CEO Jeff Skilling of energy company Enron Corp. resigned after only six months on the job, leading shares to plunge on his shock departure. Skilling had enduring months of weakness in Enron's stock price and several high-profile stumbles, which left questions if his departure had less to do with personal reasons, as he stated, and more to do with unyielding stress.
Skilling declined several requests for an interview, though he told The Wall Street Journal in August pressure he felt from a plummeting stock price and the deaths of three workers in an English power plant accident reminded him "how tenuous life is."
SPOTTING SIGNS OF STRESS:
Neff now helps Spencer Stuart and other companies decide who would make a good chief executive and who is just not cut out for the task. He calls it "one of the most important decisions the board makes" and therefore, the board should lead the process of succession and not the outgoing chief executive.
The board must also learn to watch for signs of anxiety, such as when Skilling called a fund manager an "asshole" during an analyst conference call in April, said Dr. Paul Baard, associate professor of communications and management at Fordham University's Graduate School of Business,
He said the incident was a clear indication Skilling was "cracking" under the pressure.
"If your life is tied up in your position and you're hypervigilant in your environment and you get a short seller who says this guy isn't capable of taking the company's stock price higher, that's a major threat," Baard said.
Many industry experts said boards should offer overstressed corporate officers an "executive coach" for some counseling when they see signs of stress and they should keep in mind that the smartest person in the company might not make the best boss.
"Most of the challenge of business to me is the people side," said Mark Nevins, vice president of Human Resources and professional development as executive search firm Korn/Ferry International .
"At the end of the day, running a business is partly about understanding cash flow, inventory costs, balance sheets ... those are tough to learn, but you can do it. People, however, have their own motivations, they're perverse and they don't want to be managed. Part of the challenge is to deal with that and motivate them."
Nevins said a board should look outside the company when conducting a search for chief executive so that there's a benchmark of candidate comparison.
THE INTERVIEW PROCESS
Boards should also seek the guidance of either psychologists or executive consultants on how to effectively interview candidates, said Baard, who has written about workplace issues on leadership for several academic journals.
The board needs to ask the right questions and to know what the answers really tell about a person's work ethic and personality, he said.
As chairman of Spencer Stuart and a board member for other companies, Neff has been a part of developing a careful selection process to find the right CEO, including a close look at how candidates handled tough times at other companies.
Neff suggested asking these questions:
- Do you have the stomach to make tough decisions that need to be made and might involve people you've known for years, such as job cuts?
- How does your family feel about you being a CEO and the added pressures and travel that the job would present?
"It's amazing at how often those questions are not being asked," Neff said.
Asking a candidate to tell the board about himself or herself, and knowing what the answers reveal is important, Baard said.
For example, if the person talks only about their career accomplishments and no other dimension of their life, there might be some concern that the person is not balanced, Baard said.
He said asking questions about how the executive has handled past conflict will show if they take responsibility and own their errors or if they are an "avoider" of conflict.
A good question is, "What does becoming a chief executive mean to you?" If the answer involves a lot of self-focus with little emphasis on team work and a desire to help others, than that person might not make a good chief executive, Baard said.
Another important question is to ask which constituency would give the candidate the most trouble. This makes the candidate consider who they are reporting to and can reveal if that person would be upfront with or hide from certain people, he said.
"Ask, 'What did you really screw up?'" Baard said. "That question will shock them, but you're looking for ownership. You're waiting for the 'but' and if you don't hear it, that's good."

Copyright ? 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

USA: UPDATE 2-Calif. ISO, FERC, companies discuss refund issue.
By Chris Baltimore

09/24/2001
Reuters English News Service
(C) Reuters Limited 2001.

WASHINGTON, Sept 24 (Reuters) - U.S. regulators met with California state energy officials on Monday as part of ongoing mediation efforts to determine potential refunds in the western power market, a spokeswoman for the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission said.
Separately, a House of Representatives panel signaled a possible probe into alleged price manipulation by two government-controlled California bodies that buy power for the state, according to a memo obtained by Reuters.
FERC will facilitate meetings on Monday and possibly Tuesday with the California Independent System Operator, the California Department of Water Resources - the state's main power buyer - seven private energy firms and the state's investor-owned utilities.
FERC is concerned that "reliability is being compromised" on the California power grid, Andrea Wolfman, a lawyer in FERC's enforcement office, wrote in a letter dated Sept. 17 obtained by Reuters.
"We have become concerned that the scheduling and dispatch procedures of the California ISO ... are not well understood or are not well suited to the current market structure," she said. The ISO manages the state's power grid.
FERC MULLS CALIFORNIA REFUNDS
FERC intervened in western power markets in July after months of soaring electricity prices caused blackouts and forced PG&E Corp.'s Pacific Gas & Electric utility into bankruptcy.
A FERC judge is currently considering whether energy firms owe the state refunds for overcharges in western power markets. California officials say they are owed nearly $9 billion in refunds, while energy firms say the claims are unjustified.
The closed-door meeting was to include staff from FERC's market tariffs and rates unit and its newly formed market enforcement division, as well as Richard Miles, FERC's director of dispute resolution services.
Also invited were energy firms Reliant Energy , Williams Cos. , Duke Energy Corp. , Calpine Inc., Enron Corp. , Mirant Americas Inc. and Dynegy Inc. , and utilities Pacific Gas and Electric Co., San Diego Gas and Electric, and Southern California Edison .
HOUSE COMMITTEE EYES ACTION
A separate congressional probe into the buying practices of the California ISO and the water department may be forthcoming in the Republican-led House Committee on Government Reform, according to a confidential internal committee memo.
Evidence gathered from private energy firms suggests "that complaints of market manipulation ... should be investigated," the memo said.
The memo cited long-term power contracts signed by California Democratic Gov. Gray Davis and state energy officials when electricity prices soared from the normal $30 per megawatt hour range to over $1,000 per megawatt hour in May. Cool weather and sagging demand pushed spot market prices down to about $50 per megawatt hour last month.
One megawatt is enough to power about 1,000 residential houses.
"The information that they have provided all leads to a theory that the California ISO is manipulating the market ... to purchase surplus (California Department of Water Resources') power at high prices and protect Governor Davis from embarrassment," said the memo, dated Sept. 20.
The California Department of Water Resources became the main power purchaser for the state's 34 million residents in January after soaring wholesale prices drained the state's two biggest utilities of their cash and credit.
Last week, California utility regulators dismantled another provision of the state's failed 1996 law to deregulate its electric industry by immediately suspending consumers' right to choose their power provider. The disastrous deregulation law also had capped retail electricity rates, which blocked investor-owned utilities from passing sharply higher wholesale costs on to customers.

Copyright ? 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

NORWAY: Helsinki bourse to trade weather derivatives.
By Bunny Nooryani

09/24/2001
Reuters English News Service
(C) Reuters Limited 2001.

OSLO, Sept 24 (Reuters) - Finland's Helsinki stock market said on Monday it planned to start trading in weather derivatives this autumn, becoming the first bourse in Europe to trade the contracts.
"This is a way for firms to hedge their risk of bad weather and its effects on net sales," Jyrki Kivineimi, derivatives advisor at the Helsinki bourse told Reuters.
Weather derivatives contracts, which originated in the United States, allow companies to hedge against the financial impact on their operations of changes in the weather.
He said the bourse planned to offer the market derivatives contracts based on an average temperature index and with a duration of one month.
Kivineimi declined to give a precise date for the launch of weather derivatives.
London's LIFFE derivatives exchange launched three European weather indices in July and also has plans to start weather derivatives trading, possibly in the fourth quarter this year.
Kivineimi said groups whose sales could be affected by changes in weather - such as travel companies, transport, consumer goods and energy firms - had shown particular interest in the offer.
"Many companies are interested in these products and there has already been a lot of trading in the (over-the-counter) OTC market," Kivineimi said.
"But the most potential customers are energy firms."
Energy companies use weather derivatives to protect themselves against the impact of temperature fluctuations in electricity and gas prices.
OTC weather derivatives trading has expanded over the last year with deals reported in France and Germany.
The liberalisation of Europe's energy markets over the last couple of years has sparked interest in weather derivatives as consumers face increasinly volatile gas and electricity prices.
Using the example of an electricity firm selling heating, Kivineimi said the firm could sign a derivatives contract specifying expected sales at a expected average temperature for a given month.
"If heating sales are lower than expected because of the weather being warmer than expected, the firm will be compensated for its loss that month," he said.
But he acknowledged the difficulty of entering contracts that are based on predicting weather conditions several months ahead, when meteorologists often fail to accurately predict weather from one day to the next.
"A weather derivative is more an insurance against bad weather than a prediction of good weather," he said.
Companies which are active in the European weather derivatives market include U.S.-owned firms Enron and Aquila, a subsidiary of Utilicorp and SocGen, the investment banking arm of French bank Societe Generale .

Copyright ? 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

INDIA: Enron gets impatient as Indian unit's row lingers.

09/24/2001
Reuters English News Service
(C) Reuters Limited 2001.

NEW DELHI, Sept 24 (Reuters) - U.S. energy firm Enron Corp sees no early solution to its bitter dispute with a local utility despite an assurance from Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee that New Delhi will step in to resolve the row.
The company wrote to Vajpayee more than a month ago with an offer to sell its 65-percent stake in Dabhol Power Co but the federal government has not responded, Enron India spokesman Jimmy Moghal told Reuters on Monday.
"It's been more than a month since we have communicated to government authorities and have yet to receive any response."
He said Enron Chairman Kenneth Lay had written another letter to New Delhi expressing "disappointment" at the lack of progress.
The company wrote to Vajpayee saying a long legal dispute would "raise serious questions about India's image as a safe and relialbe destination for foreign investment", Moghal said.
Earlier this month, Vajpayee said the federal government would facilitate a quick solution to Enron's dispute with the Maharashtra State Electricity Board (MSEB), which was the sole buyer of Dabhol's power.
But Enron is not optimistic.
"Contrary to recent impressions created...regarding a quick resolution of the Dabhol project, little progress has so far been made with, in fact, no proximity to reaching a fair and reasonable solution," it said in the statement.
The Times of India said Kenneth Lay wrote in his letter to Vajpayee that foreign investors would doubt the sanctity of contracts signed in India.
"Any other foreign investor or lender is going to ask himself why his contract is any more likely to be honoured than ours has been," it quoted Lay as saying.
Moghal declined comment on the newspaper report.
Enron says India may face $5 billion in liabilities for violating contractual obligations.
In May, Enron issued a preliminary notice to MSEB to terminate the contract. That move put in place a six-month deadline for the two to work out differences or the contract would be terminated.
The six-month period expires on November 19 after which Enron would decide on issuing a final termination notice.
"Consideration will be taken after November 19 whether or not we will move towards final termination, which would then lead to arbitration," Moghal said.
The first phase of the $2.9-billion project, with a generating capacity of 740 MW has been idle since May when MSEB stopped buying power. The second phase, which will add 1,444 MW of capacity, is 97-percent complete.

Copyright ? 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Northwest Power Sellers Shouldn't Pay Refunds, FERC Judge Says
2001-09-24 16:45 (New York)

Northwest Power Sellers Shouldn't Pay Refunds, FERC Judge Says

     Washington, Sept. 24 (Bloomberg) -- Enron Corp., Sempra
Energy, El Paso Corp. and other companies that sell power in the
Pacific Northwest shouldn't have to return profits they made
earlier this year when electricity prices soared, an
administrative law judge said.

     A power shortage in California sent prices soaring among all
states on the western power grid last year and much of this year.
Prices surged fourfold on average in California.

      Buyers in the Northwest are seeking $2 billion in refunds,
saying the prices paid clearly did not meet the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission's standard of ``just and reasonable.''

     ``The prices were not unreasonable or unjust, and refunds
should not be ordered in this proceeding, '' said Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission Judge Carmen Cintron, in a report to the
commission.

     The commission will make its own ruling in the case, and the
judge's finding is not binding unless followed by the
commissioners.  The Washington-state cities of Seattle and Tacoma
are among those seeking refunds for sales from Dec. 25 to June 20.

     FERC ordered Cintron to gather evidence about these
allegations during a Sept. 4-6 hearing and to recommend whether it
should consider ordering refunds. The commission hasn't said when
it plans to decide, though it has a regularly scheduled meeting
set for Wednesday.


Count me in, but the dogs will probably have issues.  Talk to you later.

"John Menconi" <jmenconi@adv-eng-ser-inc.com> on 05/08/2001 12:16:13 PM
Please respond to <jmenconi@adv-eng-ser-inc.com>
To:	"Jarrod Haughn \(E-mail\)" <JHaughn@worldnet.att.net>, "Kristine Lawrence \(E-mail\)" <REMEMBERMEL@cs.com>, "Monique Sanchez \(E-mail\)" <msanche2@enron.com>, "Trip Friend \(E-mail\)" <JWFRIEND@dow.com>, "Susan Scott \(E-mail\)" <Susan.M.Scott@enron.com>
cc:	"Robert Parry \(E-mail\)" <rparry@bcm.tmc.edu>, "Todd Doss \(E-mail\)" <Todd_Doss@dell.com>
Subject:	FW: 4th of July

Todd is trying to reserve a large (sleeps 16 comfortably) cabin on Lake
Travis around the 4th of July holiday.  The 4th is on a Wednesday this year
so he'll probably reserve it through the proceeding or following weekend.
I'm just trying to get a head count for now so anyone interested please let
me know.

We rented this place a couple years ago and had a great time.  It's located
on the lake and has a private boat dock.  Todd will most likely have his
boat for skiing and cruising the lake.  Other activities include Jet Ski
rental, wind surfing rental, sun bathing, cooking out, and drinking.

John

-----Original Message-----
From: Todd_Doss@Dell.com [mailto:Todd_Doss@Dell.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 11:35 AM
To: jmenconi@adv-eng-ser-inc.com; rparry@bcm.tmc.edu
Subject: RE:

I called and it's available. I'm going to send them an email this afternoon
and find out what the charges would be. I spoke to Bob's wife and she said
that it goes for $600 a night, but that for an extended stay he will usually
negotiate.

I guess the next thing we would need to find out is how many people would be
interested in staying at the house. Can you send Mark a note and let me know
how many of the folks in H-town would be interested and for what days?

Todd A. Doss
Large Corporate Accounts ESR Manager
Voice 800.279.3355   Ext. 89978
Cell Phone: 512.751.8827
Todd_Doss@Dell.com
For information on our award winning server & storage products:
Dell Server Site - http://www.dell.com/products/powredge/index.htm

-----Original Message-----
From: John Menconi [mailto:jmenconi@adv-eng-ser-inc.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 11:05 AM
To: Todd Doss (E-mail); Robert Parry (E-mail)
Subject:

Doss,

Here is information of the Lake Travis place.  I'm sure we could get a good
size group from H-Town so let us know if you can get a reservation.

Captain Jay's Cove Bed and Breakfast
15919 Booth Circle
in Volente 15 miles from
Austin, TX 78641
USA
Phone +1-512-258-0076
Innkeeper(s):
Bob Steichen

I found this on the following web link from which it looks like you can
request a reservation.

http://www.bbchannel.com/USA/Texas/Austin.asp

John


The information contained in this e-mail message and any accompanying
documents is subject to the attorney-client privilege and/or the attorney
work product rule and is confidential business information intended only for
the use of the individual or entity named above.  If the reader of this
message is not the intended recipient or representative of the recipient, you
are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is strictly
prohibited.  If you have received this communication in error, please notify
the Systems Administrator at admin@pkns.com and immediately delete this
message from your system.
Received: from spoo.quiknet.com by PKNS.COM; Thu, 31 May 2001 09:07:44 -0700
Received: (qmail 29379 invoked from network); 31 May 2001 16:09:23 -0000
Received: from 64.95.fo.dsl.quiknet.com (HELO govadv.com) (207.231.95.64)  by
spoo.quiknet.com with SMTP; 31 May 2001 16:09:23 -0000
Message-ID: <3B166D46.F85A0475@govadv.com>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 09:11:50 -0700
From: Scott Govenar <sgovenar@govadv.com>
Organization: Governmental Advocates, Inc.
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Win95; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: mlk@pkns.com
Subject: [Fwd: [Fwd: Senate Rules]]
Content-Type: multipart/mixed ;
boundary="------------26EB6CDAF61FCB39F375F8AD"

Rules is scheduled to meet on Monday.

X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
Message-ID: <3B1539CB.95B4841A@govadv.com>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 11:19:55 -0700
From: Scott Govenar <sgovenar@govadv.com>
Organization: Governmental Advocates, Inc.
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Win95; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: mlk@pknf.com
Subject: [Fwd: Senate Rules]
Content-Type: multipart/mixed ;
boundary="------------D5B6F002A787E12FB05FDFE5"

Sandi asked that I send this to you.

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
Message-ID: <3B153607.9E390AA6@govadv.com>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 11:03:51 -0700
From: Scott Govenar <sgovenar@govadv.com>
Organization: Governmental Advocates, Inc.
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Win95; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Hedy Govenar <hgovenar@govadv.com>, Mike Day <MDay@GMSSR.com>,  Bev
Hansen <bhansen@lhom.com>, Jeff Dasovich <jdasovic@enron.com>,  Susan J Mara
<smara@enron.com>,  Paul Kaufman <paul.kaufman@enron.com>,  Michael McDonald
<Michael.McDonald@enron.com>,  Sandra McCubbin <Sandra.McCubbin@enron.com>,
Rick Shapiro <rshapiro@enron.com>,  Jim Steffes <james.d.steffes@enron.com>,
Alan Comnes <acomnes@enron.com>,  Steven Kean <Steven.J.Kean@enron.com>,
Karen Denne <kdenne@enron.com>,  "Harry.Kingerski@enron.com"
<Harry.Kingerski@enron.com>,  Leslie Lawner <Leslie.Lawner@enron.com>,
Robert Frank <rfrank@enron.com>,  Ken Smith <ken@kdscommunications.com>,
Janel Guerrero <Janel.Guerrero@enron.com>,  Miyung Buster
<Miyung.Buster@enron.com>,  Jennifer Thome <Jennifer.Thome@enron.com>,  Eric
Letke <eletke@enron.com>, Mary Schoen <Mary.Schoen@enron.com>,  David Leboe
<David.Leboe@ENRON.com>,  Ban Sharma <ban.sharma@enron.com>
Subject: Senate Rules
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

The Senate Rules Committee is going to take up the following items later
today:

SENATOR DUNN - AS CHAIR OF THE SELECT COMMITTEE TO
INVESTIGATE PRICE MANIPULATION OF THE WHOLESALE
ENERGY MARKET, REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE
SUBPOENAS FOR DOCUMENTS, AS FULLY DESCRIBED IN
ATTACHMENTS, TO THE FOLLOWING ENERGY ENTITIES:

RELIANT ENERGY
DYNEGY ENERGY SERVICES, INC.
WILLIAMS ENERGY
ENRON CORPORATION
NRG ENERGY, INC.
DUKE ENERGY
MIRANT, INC.
AES CORPORATION

SENATOR DUNN - AS CHAIR OF THE SELECT COMMITTEE TO
INVESTIGATE PRICE MANIPULATION OF THE WHOLESALE
ENERGY MARKET, REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE
SUBPOENAS FOR DOCUMENTS, AS FULLY DESCRIBED IN
ATTACHMENTS, TO THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY
COMMISSION (FERC)


Yes.

----- Original Message -----
From: <Don.Baughman@enron.com>
To: <STICHAVSKY@PCT-INC.COM>
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 8:58 AM
Subject: RE: Good Morning!!

> Did you get 1 & 3 ?
>
> DB
>
>     -----Original Message-----
>    From:   "SCOTT TICHAVSKY" <STICHAVSKY@PCT-INC.COM>@ENRON
>    Sent:   Thursday, January 24, 2002 8:54 AM
>    To:     Baughman Jr., Don; Angie Gillikin
>    Subject:  Good Morning!!
>
>
>    I should be making it to Happy Hour at the Front  Porch this evening.
>    Something different.  I need a change.  I  will see ya'll there.
>
>    Scott T.
>
>
>
> **********************************************************************
> This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
> **********************************************************************
>


Dear Electric Power Committee Members:

This is a friendly reminder of the Natural Gas Infrastructure committee
meeting next week.  The meeting will be held in St. Louis on Tuesday, August
7, 10:00 a.m. - 3:00 p.m. at the St. Louis Airport Marriott Hotel.

Attached to this email is a summary of the abstracts received, or the
requests to send in an abstract and a title of the proposed topic.  Also
attached to this email are the abstracts that may be applicable for the
track you are working on.  This way, you'll have a head start to review
abstracts in advance of the meeting next week.

The meeting agenda, previous minutes and committee list are also included in
this email.

If you have not already done so, please RSVP by replying to this email with
your attendance confirmation.

We hope you will be able to make the meeting and look forward to seeing you
next week!

 <<6.27 Minutes.doc>>  <<Meeting Agenda 8.7.01.doc>>  <<7.30Committee Report
Short.doc>>  <<EP 2002 Abstract Summary Chart.doc>>

 <<Abstract for Ross Dueber.doc>>


---------------------- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 11/09/99
08:29 AM ---------------------------

Richard B Sanders
11/05/99 11:56 AM
Sent by: Twanda Sweet
To: James B Fallon/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Letter to Mark Roberts

Attached is a proposed letter to Mark Roberts regarding the dispute between
Enron Power Marketing, Inc. and MidAmerican Energy Company.


All the counterparties below can trade physical, and only the two I've marked
below in red can trade financial.

	Camille Gerard@ENRON
	11/17/2000 09:29 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Noel Petterson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: ClickPaper approvals (advance notice)

Tana,

The counterparties below are about to be approved in Credit. It would be
great to get your Legal response before you leave for
vacation.  We can then minimize approvals that go through Mark Taylor next
week.

Thanks,
Camille
---------------------- Forwarded by Camille Gerard/Corp/Enron on 11/17/2000
09:22 AM ---------------------------

Walter Guidroz
11/16/2000 05:21 PM
To: Camille Gerard/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Noel Petterson/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: ClickPaper approvals (advance notice)

I'm waiting on Tom to review my credit recommendations for the counterparties
below.  Once he approves these, I'll send them to you.  Thanks!

ABC Salvage Corporation
Blue Heron Paper Company
Central National-Gottesman, Inc.
Clifford Paper Inc.
Clorox Services Company
Eagle Mountain Mills Ltd.
J-Mar Paper Sales
Linden Trading Company, Inc.-can trade financial
Perry H. Koplik & Sons, Inc.
Potlatch Corporation
Premier paper
Priority Pallet, Inc.
Ris Paper Co., Inc.
R.R. Donnelley & Sons Company-can trade financial
Sierra Pine A California Limited Partnership
The Ogden Newspapers, Inc.
The Princeton Packet, Inc.


Date: Thursday, February 7th , 2002

Location: ECS 06980

Orientation will be split into two sessions and divided by alpha-order. Sessions will run 10am-12 pm and 2pm- 4 pm.

We encourage all of you to attend your designated session as valuable information will be presented, and you will have the opportunity to get answers to your questions.

You can speed things up tommorrow by filing in the attached forms - alternatively you can complete them there

10am Session   Letters A- K

2pm Session Letters L-Z

PLEASE RSVP (BY REPLYING TO THIS E-MAIL) - IF YOU HAVEN'T DONE SO ALREADY


Attached is your morning research report for Thursday, August 30, 2001. Please contact me if there are particular companies or sectors that you are interested in hearing from. (713-853-2407)

Thank You,

Hank Emery


The closing dinner for the big financing will be on Feb. 8.

Just thought I'd keep you current!

Love,

Kay


This is the presentation Mr. Kean will be using on June 12, 2001.  He will
have a CD with him as a backup.

Regards,

Ursula Brenner
ENRON CORP.
+1(713)345-3787

This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information
intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law. If
you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message and are
hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this
message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited.


We are increasing the volume delivered by HPL into Eastrans for 2/16 to 34,400
MMBtu.

Increase deliveries into PG & E to 27,400.  Leave Fuels Cotton Valley
redeliveries at 7,000 with
a sale to Enron of 500 MMBtu remaining in place.


REMINDER FOR THE TSWG CONFERENCE CALL TODAY, WEDNESDAY  @3:30PDT

Call In Number (877) 670-4111  Passcode 246870.
 <<...>>
Jim Blatchford
Client Relations
Cal ISO
916.608.7051


I'll await Mike's email.  Thanks.

-----Original Message-----
From: Don.Vignaroli@dynegy.com [mailto:Don.Vignaroli@dynegy.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 4:54 PM
To: Corman, Shelley
Cc: Mike.Mcgowan@dynegy.com
Subject: Re: FW: Restated 2002 CAPEX Plan

Shelley, first of all, I apologize for not responding in a timely manner.  I should have responded that we were waiting to gather additional comments, if any, and make one global response.  mea culpa.
Second, I received an email from Mike Mcgowan just a few moments ago wherein he is proposing a response to your request.  By copy of this memo, you can anticipate that Mike will forward a response shortly.
Again, sorry for the inconvenience.


Please pass to the appropriate person

The following documents are the two agreements which facilitate the online trading.  These contracts govern the actual transaction process and are accepted the counterparty either in writing or electronically.
Password Application	-  In writing
Electronic Trading Agreement	- Electronically

These documents do not have any customer specific terms (eg credit etc) as they are not intended to govern the underlying commodity transactions, but simply the utiliszation of the website.  If anyone is unclear of how these documents are included please let me, Dave Forster or Mark Taylor know for further information.

Louise

Louise Kitchen
Chief Operating Officer
Enron Americas
Tel:  713 853 3488
Fax: 713 646 2308


Jim:

The attached list contains information on approx. 180 of the largest
California-based companies.  The list also contains the names of individuals
with whom Ken Lay met in May 2001 to discuss the energy crisis.

Most of the companies on the attached list received a 2 mailings from Enron
earlier this year.  The first mailing provided general information about the
energy situation in California and the second mailing was about retention of
direct access.

The e-mail addresses for most CEO's or their executive assistants are
included on the attached list.

Please call if you have any questions.   I may be reached at 323/655-4660.

Sandra Yamane

 <<CEOs List June 22 2001.xls>>

 - CEOs List June 22 2001.xls


Call to discuss
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Whitt/DEN/ECT on 08/21/2000 12:05 PM
---------------------------

DEBRA PERLINGIERE@ECT
08/18/2000 10:19 AM
To: Mark Whitt/DEN/ECT@Enron, Michael J Legler/HOU/ECT@Enron, Dan J
Bump/DEN/ECT@Enron, Chris Hilgert/HOU/ECT@ect, Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: JM Huber

Please see the attached revised drafts.  Please give me a call if you have
any questions.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


do we have a gty in place for 30M ?  if so, please send me a copy.

thanks!

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


First Union Securities, Inc.

Sara and Susan,

Thank you for sending your draft Paragraph 13.  I've looked it over and
wanted to follow up on whether you've received terms from your Credit Dept.

Thanks,

Vijay K. Suchdev
Vice President
Equity Derivatives
First Union Securities, Inc.
Telephone: (212) 909-0951
Facsimile: (212) 891-5042
email: vijay.suchdev@funb.com <mailto:vijay.suchdev@funb.com>

	-----Original Message-----
	From:	Bailey, Susan [SMTP:Susan.Bailey@enron.com]
	Sent:	Wednesday, September 26, 2001 12:12 PM
	To:	vijay.suchdev@funb.com
	Cc:	Shackleton, Sara
	Subject:	FW: ISDA Master Agreement

	Mr. Suchdev,

	Attached is our sample form of Paragraph 13, which supplements the
ISDA
	Credit Support Annex boilerplate.   Once Credit has furnished us
with
	the terms under a Credit Worksheet, we will be able to provide a
version
	which includes the credit features.

	Hope this helps in the interim.

	 <<sample paragraph 13.doc>>

	Susan S. Bailey
	Enron North America Corp.
	1400 Smith Street, Suite 3803A
	Houston, Texas 77002
	Phone: (713) 853-4737
	Fax: (713) 646-3490
	Email: Susan.Bailey@enron.com

	>  -----Original Message-----
	> From: 	Shackleton, Sara
	> Sent:	Wednesday, September 26, 2001 10:57 AM
	> To:	Bailey, Susan
	> Cc:	Rohauer, Tanya
	> Subject:	FW: ISDA Master Agreement
	>
	> Susan:  While Tanya is reviewing credit, can you please send a
"blank
	> form Paragraph 13" for this master.  Just our standard.  Caveat:
	> subject to credit review even though there are blanks.  Thanks.
Sara
	>
	>  -----Original Message-----
	> From: 	"Suchdev, Vijay" <vijay.suchdev@funb.com>@ENRON
	>
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Suchdev+2C+20Vijay+22+20+3Cvijay+2Esuchdev+40fun
	> b+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
	> Sent:	Wednesday, September 26, 2001 10:14 AM
	> To:	Shackleton, Sara
	> Cc:	Gray, Steven
	> Subject:	RE: ISDA Master Agreement
	>
	> First Union Securities, Inc.
	>
	> Hi Sara,
	>
	> I just wanted to follow up on whether you will have a chance to
send a
	> draft
	> Credit Support Annex (similar in form to the one previously
executed
	> with
	> ENA).  I understand you may not have credit approval yet so
perhaps we
	> can
	> leave the appropriate sections blank in the meantime.
	>
	> Thanks and regards,
	>
	> Vijay K. Suchdev
	> Vice President
	> Equity Derivatives
	> First Union Securities, Inc.
	> Telephone: (212) 909-0951
	> Facsimile: (212) 891-5042
	> email: vijay.suchdev@funb.com <mailto:vijay.suchdev@funb.com>
	>
	> 	-----Original Message-----
	> 	From:	Shackleton, Sara [SMTP:Sara.Shackleton@enron.com]
	> 	Sent:	Tuesday, September 25, 2001 3:27 PM
	> 	To:	Vijay.Suchdev@funb.com
	> 	Subject:	ISDA Master Agreement
	>
	> 	Vijay:
	>
	> 	I've been trying to call you for about an hour, but the
circuits
	> are
	> all
	> 	busy.  Sometimes it's easier for NY to call out than for us
to
	> call
	> NY.
	> 	I'll be in my office for about an hour before meetings.
Also, I
	> am
	> free
	> 	in the morning.  We'll need to recall exactly where we were
at
	> the
	> 	beginning of August.  Thanks.  Sara
	>
	> 	Sara Shackleton
	> 	Enron Wholesale Services
	> 	1400 Smith Street, EB3801a
	> 	Houston, TX  77002
	> 	Ph:  (713) 853-5620
	> 	Fax: (713) 646-3490
	>
	>
	>
	>
	>
**********************************************************************
	> 	This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its
relevant
	> affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for
the
	> sole
	> use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution
or
	> disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the
	> intended
	> recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please
contact
	> the
	> sender or reply to Enron Corp. at
	> enron.messaging.administration@enron.com
	> and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any
attachments
	> hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do
not
	> create
	> or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp.
(or
	> any
	> of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party,
and
	> may
	> not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel
or
	> otherwise. Thank you.
	>
	>
**********************************************************************
	>
	>
	> This is for your information only and is not an offer to sell, or
a
	> solicitation of an offer to buy, the securities or instruments
	> mentioned.  The information has been obtained or derived from
sources
	> believed by us to be reliable, but we do not represent that it is
	> accurate or complete.  Any opinions or estimates contained in this
	> information constitute our judgement as of this date and are
subject
	> to change without notice.  First Union Securities, Inc. (FUSI), or
its
	> affiliates may provide advice or may from time to time acquire,
hold
	> or sell a position in the securities mentioned herein.  FUSI is a
	> subsidiary of Wachovia Corporation and is a member of the NYSE,
NASD
	> and SIPC.  FUSI is a separate and distinct entity from its
affiliated
	> banks and thrifts.
	>  << File: sample paragraph 13.doc >>

This is for your information only and is not an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy, the securities or instruments mentioned.  The information has been obtained or derived from sources believed by us to be reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Any opinions or estimates contained in this information constitute our judgement as of this date and are subject to change without notice.  First Union Securities, Inc. (FUSI), or its affiliates may provide advice or may from time to time acquire, hold or sell a position in the securities mentioned herein.  FUSI is a
subsidiary of Wachovia Corporation and is a member of the NYSE, NASD and SIPC.  FUSI is a separate and distinct entity from its affiliated banks and thrifts.


Steve,
	Here is the draft summary of Enron's ripple claims against
non-claimants (entities that are not seeking refunds in the PNW proceeding.)

	For illustrative purposes, we have used three different reference
prices:  (1) ISO; (2) Seattle; and (3) Tacoma.  We believe all three are
substantially flawed, but they give you a comparison to work with.  Please
let me know if you need more detail.

 <<ripple summary.xls>>
Thanks
Gary
Privileged and Confidential
Attorney Client Communication
Attorney Work Product

=======================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to postmaster@brobeck.com
BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP
http://www.brobeck.com


I'm going home...can you believe it?  Give me a call when you get out of
here.

Talk to ya later,
Robin


I would like to thank all of you for putting quality time and effort into
this important process.  There is nothing more important to ENA than
attracting and retaining the most talanted and innovative people.

Effectively immediately, written and oral feedback for commercial managers
and directors can be delivered. As per our discussion, the PRC process is
primarily a feedback, performance management and staff planning tool.  It
provides a data point for bonus purposes; however, it is not the only
determinant.  In the interest of ensuring the most effective performance
management tool, I would suggest that we implement the following:
 a)For employees ranked in the strong and above categories, the ultimate
ranking should not be communicated and the message should focus on progress
towards identified commercial goals and objectives and progress towards the
further development of desirable leadership and commerical capabilities.
Written and oral feedback should be delivered immediately;
 b) For employees ranked in the satisfactory, needs improvement and issues
category, the ultimate ranking should be communicated to ensure approriate
documentation of performance and to stimulate a plan to rectify or cure
performance issues.  For the satisfactory category, the message should focus
on increasing deal-flow, financial performance and productivity.  The bar is
always being raised.  For the needs improvement category, the message should
focus on turning around poor performance over the next six months.  For the
issues category, the business unit manager should determine, in conjunction
with your HR rep., the appropriate plan to find a better "fit" in the
organization or counsel out.  Regardless, the ENA Office of the Chairman will
require a written plan of action for all employees in the needs improvement
and issues category from the business unit manager documenting the plan of
action to rectify performance.

Vice President ranking can not be communicated until after the Enron VP PRC
currently scheduled for July 31st.  I anticipate a similar process as above
with our officer feedback process.  Associate and Analyst rankings can not be
communicated until after the Enron A&A PRC currently scheduled for July 19th.

Other identified action items from the meetings include:
 a) the HR group will put together a "profile and performance book" for ENA's
A&A's to ensure our representatives can augment performance information at
the July 19th meeting;
 b) ENA will be aggressively attempting to retain highest performing A&A's to
continue rotating within ENA;
 c) ENA will be holding an additional "off-cycle" A&A super-saturday for
Houston and Portland in August to augment our capabilities in this area;
 and d) your HR representative is building a pipeline of outside employment
candidates for your review each week.  Please review these resumes in a
timely basis and let them know your interest or lack thereof.

Please communicate to your organization as appropriate.

Regards
Mark and Dave


Thanks.  These are the portions of the deal that I've been highlighting as
problematic for us with the settlement group for  the past few weeks.  The
group knows that unless there's some compromise on these points in a way that
directly addresses our concerns, we won't be signing anything.  After
yesterday's call, at which Edison blew the meeting up, there's no deal in
sight in the immediate term.

	Scott Stoness@EES
	12/19/2000 08:47 AM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/Na/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES, Gordon Savage/HOU/EES@EES, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: Revised CESG Outline

If this settlement discussion is close to possible we should immediately
starting switching customers to standard offer.  Scott

Other comments:

This would be the critical excerpts for us:

Upon termination by a customer of the utility commitment in favor of a direct
access arrangement, a customer could not return to the utility portfolio,
except on a spot-price basis, for a period of [one year]; accommodations
would be made for customers abandoned by direct access providers with no
market alternatives.

(2) Large customers would be required to commit to a minimum service term of
[12-36 months]; discontinuing service prior to the end of the committed term
to engage in a direct access transaction with another supplier would result
in a true-up of the price paid by the customer and the actual portfolio price
during the term.

These comments are applicable:
The first term would be okay if it does not change to limit us from switching
back to utility because we have been off for one year.  The issues is whether
the one year terms is notice or elapsed time.  This suggests time is of the
essense in switching back to standard offer.
The 2nd term would be okay but 12 would be a lot better than 36.  And 24 is
pretty good too. 36 is better than a kick in the head.

And a principle that,
DA customers would have access to the existing generation, at cost, the same
as all other industrials, should be added.

We should not sign off on this solution (if they are seeking it) unless we
have the option to switch back to standard offer.

From: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON on 12/18/2000 11:52 AM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
To: Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES, Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES, Dennis
Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Revised CESG Outline

FYI.  Please keep this internal and confidential.  Here's where the group I
mentioned left off last Friday.  It will be useful for our discussion this
afternoon.  You'll note from the comments that it's anything but a done
deal.  I'll forward the SF press mentioned in the note.

Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 12/18/2000 11:36 AM -----

	Evelyn Kahl Elsesser <eke@aelaw.com>
	12/17/2000 11:05 PM

		 To: Keith McCrea <kmccrea@sablaw.com>, "Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)"
<jdasovic@enron.com>, Ralph Cavanagh <RCavanagh@nrdc.org>, Bill Booth
<wbooth@booth-law.com>, Ann Cohn <cohnap@sce.com>, Jan Smutny-Jones
<smutny@iepa.com>, Delaney Hunter <dhunter@smithandkempton.com>, "Carolyn
McIntyre (E-mail)" <cmcintyre@sempra.com>, "John Fielder (E-mail)"
<fieldejr@sce.com>, "Tony Braun (E-mail)" <braun@cmua.org>,
"jeflory@calpx.com" <jeflory@calpx.com>, Barbara Barkovich
<brbarkovich@earthlink.net>, Dominic DiMare <dominic.dimare@calchamber.com>,
Dan Richard <ddr0@pge.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Revised CESG Outline

A revised CESG outline is attached, updated to reflect Friday's
discussion.  While we discussed much greater detail, I have continued to
try to keep the outline more general to avoid generating a treatise at
this point.  Particularly, we discussed much greater detail around the
rate stabilization plan than is reflected in the attached outline.

SCE has committed to providing some sort of percentage or tiered term
structure for forward contracting to complete that section of the
framework (section 2).  Obviously, PG&E's ideas in this area would also
be welcome.

In Section 4 (undercollections) I have thrown in the numbers provided to
the Chronicle for the Saturday morning article describing the extent to
which the utilities may have already committed to Governor Davis to
absorb undercollections.  (Which leads to the question for John and Dan,
again, whether we are wasting our time with this exercise given the
media coverage describing the state of the IOU deal.)

Delaney has committed to provide a call-in number for tomorrow's 3:30
conference call.  Thank you all again for your efforts.


Start Date: 3/3/01; HourAhead hour: 7;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001030307.txt


Hey guy, please copy Scott Goodell and Molly on anything you send me in the
future.  Molly will be working with me on all the CES deals.  Her email
address is Molly.Johnson@enron.com.

Thanks

dkinney@columbiaenergygroup.com on 04/13/2000 09:06:05 AM
To: " - *Kevin.Ruscitti@enron.com" <Kevin.Ruscitti@enron.com>, " -
*chris.germany@enron.com" <chris.germany@enron.com>
cc: " - *Dalphon, Charles" <cdalpho@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *Scott,
David" <dscott1@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *Bizik, Kim"
<knovsek@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *Jones, Donna"
<djones1@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *Destephanis, Kara"
<kdestep@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *Boyd, Heidi"
<hboyd@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *cfrankl2@enron.com"
<cfrankl2@enron.com>, " - *joan.veselack@enron.com"
<joan.veselack@enron.com>, " - *vversen@enron.com" <vversen@enron.com>, " -
*cindy.vachuska@enron.com" <cindy.vachuska@enron.com>, " -
*cora_pendergrass@enron.com" <cora_pendergrass@enron.com>, " -
*mmitche2@enron.com" <mmitche2@enron.com>, " - *scott.goodell@enron.com"
<scott.goodell@enron.com>, " - *steve.gillespie@enron.com"
<steve.gillespie@enron.com>, " - *cgarcia@enron.com" <cgarcia@enron.com>, " -
*despey@enron.com" <despey@enron.com>, " - *joann.collins@enron.com"
<joann.collins@enron.com>
Subject: CES Daily April '00 Requirements for 4/10/00 and after

The attached file contains our daily volume requirements for    and  the
following day(s) as listed .    There are three  worksheets labelled as
follows:

'Total Reqs':  Contains the volumes that CES is requesting from Enron at each
of the delivery points and dates indicated in the columns labelled "NOM".
The
Enron schedulers will want to check this sheet to see how much gas is needed
at
a specific point.   The AGL volumes are not timely and should be ignored until
further notice.    CES schedulers note:  the attached file is archived on
P:\Energy Ops\Enron\April_00\Daily\ *.xls, so you don't have to save a
duplicate copy elsewhere on the network.
'Daily Change' :  shows the change (increase +/decrease -) in the daily volume
needed from Enron at the designated citygate delivery point relative to the
supply volumes arranged previously with Enron prior to the current date.  For
the current gas day, the change is an intra-day change and is calculated using
the previous day's volume request for the current day (e.g., If the current
gas
day is 3/28, then the change is computed with respect to the 3/27 request for
3/28.  Note that this procedure assumes that the prior day supply change was
in
fact effectuated).  For tomorrow's gas day and any subsequent ones shown, the
change is computed as the latest Dth Nomination requirement less the
First-of-the-month supply volume plus or minus any adjustments made since the
first-of-the-month to the FOM supply for the (future) days shown.  (e.g., If
today is 3/28, then the change for 3/29, 3/30, etc. is computed with respect
to
the first-of-the-month volumes for those days adjusted for any additional
purchases or sell-backs since the first-of-the-month thru 3/27.)   This sheet
should be useful in determining prices for daily changes in gas volumes that
we
take or turn back.   The column labelled "ENA Daily Swing +/- vs FOM volume'
shows the absolute magnitude of the daily swings allowed by ENA at
pre-specified prices.  Prices for Swing volumes exceeding these magnitudes or
for swings at delivery points without pre-specified pricing must be
negotiated.
'TCO Storage':  Shows the daily swings taken by CES on its (paper) storage
injection for the month.    Daily swings on TCO storage may be used to meet
some or all of the daily swings at delivery points off TCO as shown in the
"Daily Change' worksheet.   Omitted pending resolution of TCO storage issues.

Doug Kinney
Ph:  703-561-6339
Fax:  703-561-7317

 - 04-13-00 Daily VolsAM.xls


==================================================
NOTE TO SUBSCRIBERS:
Due to the shutdowns on Capitol Hill, all access
restrictions for NationalJournal.com have been lifted.
No password or "I.P. recognition" is required to
access The Hotline or the rest of the site.
==================================================

Today's HOTLINE is now available on nationaljournal.com:
http://nationaljournal.com/pubs/hotline/

TOP STORY: The '02 Effect

WHAT'S HOT:
* What's with Bush's love affair with Bob Rubin?
* Latest Riordan consultant: Susan Estrich.

TODAY ON NATIONALJOURNAL.COM:

-- CONGRESS: Mean Times At Ways And Means
   http://nationaljournal.com/members/news/2001/10/1019nj3.htm

-- DAYBOOK: What's On Tap In Washington This Week
   http://nationaljournal.com/members/calendar/

=================== ADVERTISEMENT ====================
WETA and The Hotline present "The Hotline World Extra"

o A nightly news update focusing on international
    coverage of the global war on terrorism.
o Hosted by Craig Crawford,
    Executive Publisher of The Hotline.
o Weeknights at 10:56pm on WETA TV 26.

Brought to you in sponsorship by Lockheed Martin.
========== http://www.lockheedmartin.com/ ============

To stop receiving these E-mail Alerts:

Simply reply to this e-mail with the word "unsubscribe" (without quotes) in the BODY OF YOUR REPLY. If the e-mail address you wish to remove from the list is not your current e-mail address, insert the address in question after the word "unsubscribe" (ie, "unsubscribe name@company.com").
----------------------------
The Hotline is published daily by National Journal Group Inc. For more information about National Journal Group's publications, go to http://www.nationaljournal.com.


Is Hill available for trade?  Let me know what on my team interests you.

-Eric


What's Next for
Enron Federal Credit Union

Over the years, Enron Federal Credit Union has been proud to share the Enron name and support many wonderful employees and their family members around the world.  Here are some of the exciting changes slated for the Credit Union in the coming months.

New Name
We believe it is important to change our name for the sake of our members and our organization. Our new name will reflect everything that we stand for: trustworthiness, outstanding service, innovative products, value and convenience. You can expect to hear about our official new name later this month.

Expanded Field of Membership
Also, being a single sponsor Credit Union for Enron Corp., it has become necessary to expand our field of membership. We continue to welcome and serve current Enron employees and their families, but we will now also invite individuals and businesses that live, work or worship in Downtown Houston and the surrounding areas to become members of our Credit Union.

Additional Location
Another immediate area of focus for the Credit Union is our location. We have made plans to open an additional full-service facility that will be located in close proximity to the Enron Building in the downtown area with easy access. More information about our new location will be announced as soon as it becomes available. At this time, our current office facility will remain open and accessible for all of our members.

We are excited about the changes that 2002 will bring and look forward to sharing the experience with each of our members.


Are you live?  I apologize for not calling you on my way down...didn't end
up coming to Houston until Friday morning...Shorter slated me as his
substitute for a Thursday evening event...How was your Christmas and NYE?
Do you have IM?


Vince,

I have added a lot of material to "fill in the wholes" and would like your
reaction to the current draft.  I am still not very happy with the risk
management segment (primarily as a result of my own lack of knowledge) so
please read it carefully and get me your comments.

I plan to let Don Chew (the editor) take a look at it to give us his
guidance toward a successful draft.

Hope you are having a great day and tremendous start to the new year.

Your friend

john

p.s. I really enjoyed your papers.  those should definitely be part of a
class on risk management.

 - Enron_Paper_1_11_01.doc

John D. Martin
Carr P. Collins Chair in Finance
Finance Department
Baylor University
PO Box 98004
Waco, TX 76798
254-710-4473 (Office)
254-710-1092 (Fax)
J_Martin@Baylor.edu
web:    http://hsb.baylor.edu/html/martinj/home.html


approved..please proceed to execution

-----Original Message-----
From: Beth Ng [mailto:Beth.Ng@morganstanley.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 9:28 AM
To: Bailey, Susan
Cc: Shackleton, Sara; Rohauer, Tanya; William.Bradford@ENRON.com;
Anthony T Lupiano JR
Subject: Fourth Amendment to Master Agreement

Re:    Proposed Fourth Amendment to the Master Energy Price Swap
Agreement between Enron North America Corp. ("Enron") and Morgan Stanley
Capital Group Inc. ("MSCGI")

Dear Susan:

Pursuant to the discussions between Anthony Lupiano of our Credit
Department and Bill Bradford of your Credit Department yesterday,
attached you will find a proposed Fourth Amendment to the Master Energy
Price Swap Agreement.  The purpose of this Fourth Amendment is to amend
the Exposure Threshold definition.    It is my understanding that Mr.
Bradford has agreed to these terms.   Our Credit Department is expecting
that we bring this document to a closure quickly.

Please contact me with any questions or comments you may have.

Kind regards,

Beth Ng
Commodities Division - Documentation
Tel:  212 761 8720
Fax: 212-507-4898 /  212 761 0293
Email:  Beth.Ng@morganstanley.com

1585 Broadway, 4th Floor
New York, NY   10036


Gerald - as discussed last week, below is the electronic version of the
ENA/WIC PA.  I've reviewed the agreement and I am satisfied with the content
except for (1)  "Corp" needs to be added to ENRON NORTH AMERICA where
applicable; (2) (Section 5) Board of Directors should be changed to Senior
Management and the approval date for ENA Sr. Management be changed from July
17, 2000 to August 18th.  Also, do we want to change the Applicable Law to
Texas?

Mike - could you please look at this and make any additonal comments.

It appears we are still wating for the amendment.

chris
x31666

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Meyer/HOU/ECT on 07/10/2000 10:17
AM ---------------------------

"Lobban, Laine" <Laine.Lobban@Coastalcorp.com> on 07/07/2000 05:23:49 PM
To: "'mlegler@enron.com'" <mlegler@enron.com>, "'chris.meyer@enron.com'"
<chris.meyer@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: FW: Here is Enron - ta da. Now, are the ones I received from Ste ve
K. okay?

Attached is the loop agreement.  Please call to discuss.  We should have the
amendment completed soon (since it did not change much if at all).  Let's
plan to talk Monday.  Thanks.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rose, Gwen
> Sent: Friday, July 07, 2000 4:09 PM
> To: Lobban, Laine
> Subject: Here is Enron - ta da.  Now, are the ones I received from
> Steve K. okay?
>
>
>  <<Enron Loop  Agmt 7-07 ver3c.doc>>
> Gwen Rose
> (719) 520-4358
> gwen.rose@coastalcorp.com
>

 - Enron Loop  Agmt 7-07 ver3c.doc


---------------------- Forwarded by John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron on 12/28/2000
10:23 AM ---------------------------

Andrea Yowman
12/20/2000 07:14 PM
To:
cc: Richard Causey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Gina Corteselli/Corp/Enron@Enron (bcc:
John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron)

Subject: VP/MD Final PRC - Request from Rick Causey

In preparation for the final VP and MD PRC meeting, Rick has identified you
as a key business person to provide feedback on employees in his functional
organization.  We have made arrangements for you to access the Performance
Management System commonly known as PEP.  The URL is pep.corp.enron.com.
Please take a few minutes to access the system and provide your feedback on
the employees indicated under your id.  Rick would greatly appreciate it if
you could do this by Friday December 29th, but knowing the holidays are upon
us, no later than Tuesday January 2nd.   Your feedback is critical to this
process.

Should you need assistance accessing the system please feel free to contact
the help desk at ext. 34777,option 4.  Thanks and have a safe holiday.

44207783404 (London) , option 4


Is that his name???

Dawn


the other side backed out

"Bass, Jason" <Jason.Bass2@COMPAQ.com> on 08/16/2000 09:53:54 AM
To: "'Eric.Bass@enron.com'" <Eric.Bass@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: RE: trade

ok

-----Original Message-----
From: Eric.Bass@enron.com [mailto:Eric.Bass@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2000 9:52 AM
To: Bass, Jason
Subject: RE: trade

i have to swing the other side of it , i'll let you know

"Bass, Jason" <Jason.Bass2@COMPAQ.com> on 08/16/2000 09:45:59 AM

To:   "'Eric Bass'" <Eric.Bass@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:  RE: trade

I will do that.

-----Original Message-----
From: Eric Bass [mailto:Eric.Bass@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2000 2:04 PM
To: Bass, Jason
Subject: trade

how about the final pick in the 2nd and my third for your 2nd and your 4th


Hi Jeff:

I see you're going to be at the CFEE conference.

I'm looking for someone driving from Ontario to Palm Springs Sunday night.
My flight gets into Ontario at 9:30.

Thanks!

--Dan K.


What's the website you bought the Adirondack chairs off of.  We are looking
to pick up a couple more.

KR