Currently, we are unable to use IT to serve Ogy at Doyle on Transco.  I have devised a super scientific method for pricing VNG space for Ogy.  Poke all the holes in it you want.

Use the following formulas to determine the price to Ogy

The higher of
St 65 Offer plus $.35
TCO Offer plus $.14

Good Luck


I think I confirmed for this already, but could you check and put on my
calendar and put this in the meeting file.
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 09/27/2000 05:36 PM -----

	Sherri Sera
	09/05/2000 10:07 AM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Electricity Deregulation Report Card

Steve, I spoke with Ginger about your availability to deliver a keynote
address at a Maguire Energy Institute conference on "Electricity Deregulation
Report Card" on November 1.  Jeff is on this board, and they asked us if we
could enlist Ken Lay to deliver this keynote.  Ken is scheduled to be at a
board meeting in Washington this date, so is not available.   I suggested
that you may be a suitable replacement, and they are very interested in the
prospect of your participation.

The link below is to the website for this conference, and the keynote would
be delivered from 1:00p-1:30p, immediately following the luncheon.  Please
let me know if you are available and willing to deliver this keynote; I would
appreciate a response today if possible.

Thanks, SRS
---------------------- Forwarded by Sherri Sera/Corp/Enron on 09/05/2000
09:49 AM ---------------------------

"Mesch, Allen" <amesch@mail.cox.smu.edu> on 09/05/2000 09:34:25 AM
To: "Jeffrey K. Skilling (E-mail)" <jskilli@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Electricity Deregulation Report Card

Sherri,

The link to the Maguire Energy Institute's "Electricity Deregulation Report
Card" is http://maguireenergy.cox.smu.edu/programs/fallconf.html

Thanks for your help.

Allen Mesch
Director
Maguire Energy Institute
Edwin L. Cox School of Business
Southern Methodist University
PO Box 750333
Dallas, TX  75275-0333

Phone: 214-768-3692
Fax: 214-768-4099
E-mail: amesch@mail.cox.smu.edu
Internet Site: http://maguireenergy.cox.smu.edu


Zimin,

I think it's a combination of shrinking supply and new peaking power plants
demands.

Vince

Zimin Lu
06/21/2000 03:06 PM
To: Mike A Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Clayton
Vernon/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: AGA for 6/23 is predicted at 69

Mike,

My number for 6/23 is 69.  see the graph for the recent numbers.

64 number is really low, what is the reason ?

Zimin


Sara, I am forwarding this to you because as you will notice your last name
has been misspelled.  I have been speaking with Peoples recently about the
potential sale of some financial options via Enovate.  This has brought up to
issue of the ISDA agreement.  I don't know if you are the one working on this
specific ISDA, but I got your name off a document showing you as the person
working in general on ISDA agreements between Enovate and third parties.

I will call shortly to insure you receive this, and one more to follow, and
that you are the appropriate person.  If you need to reach me, my extension
is 36900.

Thanks,

Steve
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven Curlee/Corp/Enron on 09/28/2000
09:19 AM ---------------------------

b.marozas@pecorp.com on 09/27/2000 05:37:59 PM
To: Sara.shackelton@enron.com
cc: Steven.Curlee@enron.com

Subject: FW: Enovate/PEC ISDA Materials

Sara,

We were trying to finalize the ISDA between PEC and Enovate.
Fred is going to be out of the office until Thursday, but I wanted to
forward the ISDA information he has been working on.
Based on the ISDA materials attached, do you know how close (best quess:
number of days, weeks or months) we are to finalizing the contract?

Thanks,
Brian

 <<MEH Schedule to Master Agreement v.1.doc>>  <<MEH-PEC Paragraph 13 to
Credit Support.doc>>

 <<MEH-PEC ISDA.doc>>  <<MEH-PEC Credit Support Annexy-bi.doc>>

 <<MEH-PEC Paragraph 13 Exhibit A.doc>>

  ----------
  From:  Jacobsen, Fred
  Sent:  Tuesday, September 26, 2000 10:43 AM
  To:  Marozas, Brian; Huprikar, Aparna
  Cc:  Nassos, John G.; Pokorny, Judy
  Subject:  Enovate/PEC ISDA Materials

  Attached please find drafts of the following ISDA documents
to be entered into between Enovate, L.L.C. and Peoples Energy Corporation:

  1. Schedule to Master Agreement
  2. Paragraph 13 to Credit Support Annex
  3. Exhibit A to Paragraph 13 to Credit Support Annex
  4. ISDA Master Agreement
  5. ISDA Credit Support Annex.

  Brian, please forward to me the contact information for the
person handling the negotiation of these documents on behalf of Enron.
Thank you, Fred.

  <<File: MEH Schedule to Master Agreement v.1.doc>><<File:
MEH-PEC Paragraph 13 to Credit Support.doc>>

  <<File: MEH-PEC ISDA.doc>><<File: MEH-PEC Credit Support
Annexy-bi.doc>>

  <<File: MEH-PEC Paragraph 13 Exhibit A.doc>>

----------------------------------------------------------------
The information transmitted is intended only for the person
or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential
and/or privileged material.  Any review, retransmission,
dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in
reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the
intended recipient is prohibited.   If you received this in error, please
contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.

 - MEH Schedule to Master Agreement v.1.doc
 - MEH-PEC Paragraph 13 to Credit Support.doc
 - MEH-PEC ISDA.doc
 - MEH-PEC Credit Support Annexy-bi.doc
 - MEH-PEC Paragraph 13 Exhibit A.doc


Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 05/22/2000 05:47 PM -----

	Carol St Clair
	05/22/2000 05:42 PM

		 To: SL.Morrison@mbltd.
		 cc: Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: ISDA Comments

Sandy:
Susan Bailey passed on to me your comments to the ISDA draft and I can
respond to some but not all of such comments at this point:

1. With respect to your Canadian securities rep, I am checking with our
counsel in Canada about whether we can use your language instaed of ours.

2. With respect to the Options rep and the ESP rep in part %, Section (b), I
believe that both parties need to make such reps.  The rep in Part 5
(b)(g)(ii) is to cover the Trade Option exemption and it is different from
the ESP rep below it.

3. With respect to the language in Part 5, Section (a), this is different
from the setoff language.    What this is saying is that if a party has
fulfilled all of its payment obligations and an Event of Default occurs with
respect to it (the "Defaulting Party"), the other party cannot withhold any
payment that it owes to the Defaulting Party.  This is different from the
exercise of setoff rights.

4. I would like to discuss with you or your legal representative the removal
of the arbitration language as it is Enron's policy to have arbitration apply.

5. We would prefer to keep the Termination Currency specified in US Dollars.

6. Our tax group believes that we need the language in Part 3(a)(i), (ii).
Why do you want to delete it?

I look forward to hearing from you.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
E-Mail Carol.St.Clair@enron.com


I just purchased 35000 day for Sat, Sun and Mon from New Power (deal 525128)
at $8.40.  Bookout with deal 525121 (sale at IF + .0125).


-----Original Message-----
From: Rodriquez, Andy
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 4:46 PM
To: Black, Tamara Jae; '/o=ENRON/ou=NA/cn=Recipients/cn=notesaddr/cn=a478079f-55e1f3b0-862566fa-612229'; Abler, William; Aggarwal, Anubhav; Allen, Diana; Arora, Harry; Bailey, Debra; Ballato, Russell; Ballinger, Ted; Baughman Jr., Don; Benchluch, Moises; Benjelloun, Hicham; Benson, Robert; Bentley, Corry; Blaine, Jay; Bolt, Laurel; Broderick, Paul J.; Broussard, Richard; Burnett, Lisa; Campbell, Larry F.; Capasso, Joe; Carson, Mike; Chen, Alan; Choate, Jason; Cline, Kevin; Collins, Dustin; Comeaux, Keith; Coulter, Kayne; Davis, Mark Dana; Day, Smith L.; Dean, Clint; Decook, Todd; Emesih, Gerald; Errigo, Joe; Forney, John M.; Freije, William; Garcia, Miguel L.; Gilbert, Gerald; Gilbert-smith, Doug; Giron, Gustavo; Greer, Andrew; Gualy, Jaime; Guerra, Claudia; Gulmeden, Utku; Gupta, Gautam; Ha, Amie; Hanse, Patrick; Hernandez, Juan; Imai, Rika; Ingram, David; Jenkins IV, Daniel; Kaniss, Jason; King, Jeff; Kinser, John; Larkworthy, Carrie; Laurent, Dean; Laverell, Justin; Lenartowicz, Chris; Lorenz, Matt; Lotz, Gretchen; Lowell, Thomas; Mack, Iris; Mahajan, Ashish; Makkai, Peter; Marquez, Mauricio; Maskell, David; May, Tom; McElreath, Alexander; Miller, Jeffrey; Oh, Seung-Taek; Olinde Jr., Steve; Pace, Andy; Padron, Juan; Pan, Steve; Philip, Willis; Podurgiel, Laura; Poppa, John D.; Presto, Kevin M.; Quenet, Joe; Rawal, Punit; Rogers, Benjamin; Rust, Bill; Ryan, David; Saibi, Eric; Schiavone, Paul; Schneider, Bryce; Seely, Michael; Serio, Erik; Shoemake, Lisa; Simpson, Erik; Stalford, Robert; Stepenovitch, Joe; Sturm, Fletcher J.; Symms, Mark; Tamma, Ramanarao; Thomas, Paul D.; Trejo, Reese; Valdes, Maria; Vernon, Clayton; Wang, Steve; Williams, Ryan; Willis, Cory; Zipperer, Mike; Baughman, Edward D.; Clynes, Terri; Dalton III, Oscar; Kelly, Mike E.; Sewell, Doug; Valderrama, Larry; Walton, Steve; Roan, Michael; Perrino, Dave; Maurer, Luiz; Hueter, Barbara A.; Landwehr, Susan M.; Hoatson, Tom; Novosel, Sarah; Nicolay, Christi L.; Yeung, Charles
Subject: RE: RTO Week -- Summary of Standards and Practices Panel

RTO Week

 <?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />

Day 4 - October 18, 2001

Afternoon Session

Standardizing Markets, Business, and Other Practices

Panelists for this discussion were:  Sarah Barpoulis, PG&E National Energy Group; William P. Boswell, GISB; Bill Burkes (substituting for David J. Christiano), City Utilities of Springfield, Missouri; David N. Cook, NERC General Counsel; Michael Kormos PJM Interconnection; LeRoy Koppendrayer, Minnesota Public Utilities Commission; and Marty Mennes, Florida Power & Light Company.

General Observations

The Commissioners were all present the majority of the time (Massey left late in the  afternoon).  FERC Staff was active in the discussion; however, the commissioners were very active as well, asking perhaps as much as 70% of all questions.  There was a general consensus that standards were needed; much discussion focused simply on how much and by who. The Commission seemed very interested in leaning what they needed to do to move the industry forward and how far they needed to go.  Panelists urged the need to mover forward as quickly as possible, but both they and FERC seemed to recognize that some of the issues regarding standardized market design and such needed to be addressed before RTOs could really begin to move forward.  There was discussion on identifying which industry group (NERC or GISB) would take the reins in the future.  On an interesting tangential note, there was noticeable conflict between NERC and GISB, with veiled insults between the two organizations somewhat common during the discussions.

FERC Deliverables

A great deal of the discussions focused on identifying what the industry needed from the Commission.  Staffers probed all panelists to find what they felt was critical.

The first major topic was "How many RTOs?  What is their scope?"  All panelists seemed to agree that this question needed to be answered immediately by FERC, in strong definitive language.  N o one offered any specific language, but seemed to be urging FERC to issue a formal statement.

The next topic was, "What will be standard market design?"  Panelists varied on this, but most felt strong guidance from FERC is urgent.  Some urged for one mandatory design for North America, one supported a set of rigid standard designs, one supported a single design with requests for exceptions (followed by an in-depth review process), and one seemed to prefer the current situation.

The commission in general seemed to be very interested in understanding what the industry needed to move forward.  They continually visited this topic throughout their discussions, asking questions like, "Do we need to issue a Mega-Order that addresses all these issues?" and, "How much detail do you need us to provide?"   General feel from the panelsists seemed to be they wanted strong leadership in this areas.  Kormos and Burkes went so far as to say FERC should "Mandate as much as they felt comfortable - and then go a little further."  Others seemed to be a little worried about this idea, but in general did not oppose the concept, citing only general warnings and the need for cautious investigation.

One item of interest: Wood referred to the filing made by the Electronic Scheduling Collaborative and specifically asked if the items identified in the "RTO Design and RTO Implementation" section would address many of the questions and uncertainty facing the industry with regard to RTO design.  Kormos indicated that clear and specific answers to these questions specifying a course of action would go a long way toward guiding the industry.  The section to which Wood referred was one that I wrote, and asked the following questions:

?         Congestion Management - When Operational Security Violations occur, how is the system to be stabilized in a fair and equitable manner that is nonetheless efficient?  Will LMP based systems be standard, or will there be others that must be accommodated?

?         Transmission Service  - Are transmission services required to schedule ("covered" schedules only), or are they risk management tools protecting from congestion charges (both "covered" and "uncovered" schedules are allowed)?

?         Loop Flows  - Are contract-path based or flow-based transmission services appropriate?  If contract-path based, how are parallel path issues to be addressed?

?         Grandfathered Transmission Service - Should contracts existing prior to RTO development be transferred, or is there an equitable way to retire those contracts?  Are there other solutions?

?         Energy Imbalance Markets - How are imbalance markets to function? Will they serve as real-time energy markets (support unbalanced schedules), be limited to supplying needs of imbalance service (require balanced schedules), or will they be required at all?

?         Ancillary Services - Will ancillary service markets be developed in standard ways?  Will entities be required to actually schedule ancillary services (required to schedule), or will they be treated primarily as financial instruments (protecting against real-time POLR charges)?

?         Losses - Can we utilize the imbalance markets to support losses?  Can we create specific loss standards that facilitate the scheduling process, or must we support methods that are currently in tariffs, but technically unwieldy?

?         Non-Jurisdictionals - How are non-jurisdictionals to be integrated into the new world?  Should systems be designed with the assumption that non-jurisdictional will be part of an RTO?  Or should they be designed to treat each NJE as a separate entity?

Hopefully, FERC will use this section as a template to answer these critical questions in an assertive manner, and give some solid direction in which to move. Kormos emphasized the need for concrete answers to these questions, pointing out that vague answers (i.e., "do congestion management") will take a year or two to resolve, but specific answers (i.e., "LMP with financial hedging instruments") will take only months.  The Commission asked Mike about moving forward, and he told them that effectively, it was impossible to move forward with implementation without getting these issues addressed.

Now for a  funny point - One of the commissioners (I think Breathitt) referred to some concerns expressed in the Northwest that their high concentration of hydro power makes LMP inefficient for the Northwest.  Kormos flat out said, "My profession is understanding how power systems work, and I don't believe that that statement is true."  He then backpedaled a bit and said that it would need more study, but he stood by his statement that the assertion by the Northwest interests was false.

NERC and GISB

A great deal of discussion focused around the need for a single standard-setting organization.  Massey went so far as to ask, "Are we looking at a beauty contest between NERC and GISB?"  Cook and Boswell then went into several short polite jabs at each other's organizations.  Other participants continually reiterated the need for ONE, INDEPENDENT organization.  Interestingly, Boswell was very emphatic about the established trust and respect in GISB, while Cook preferred to only talk about the "new" structure of NERC and did not focus on its history.

Brownell offered some not-too-subtle passive support of GISB by pointedly asking both Cook and Boswell if they lobbied political positions (i.e., were they not only an organization but also a stakeholder?).  GISB was easily able to say they were not, but NERC of course had to admit to their romancing of Congress and the Bush administration for reliability legislation. Point, Brownell.

Mennes acted as somewhat of a supporter for NERC, playing Dave Cook's yes-man.  He probably did them a little bit of harm by pointing to NERC's supposed "successes," such as TLR and E-Tag.  If staffers have tenure, they will likely remember that these "successes" have not been so successful, resulting in several filings and interventions.  We may also wish to file comments in specific objection to these claims, to refresh their memory and to show the pretty picture Marty painted was in fact a fiction.

There was a little discussion about splitting reliability and market issues, but general consensus was that I could not be done.  There was also some talk of folding NERC under GISB/EISB.

The arguments began winding down after a some time, and Boswell strongly urged the Commission to speak to industry executives and advocacy group leadership to see whether NERC or GISB should lead the industry forward.  NERC somewhat less enthusiastically supported this position.  In general, I would say it was a close fight but GISB came out more on top.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Andy Rodriquez
Regulatory Affairs - Enron Corp.
andy.rodriquez@enron.com
713-345-3771


I would be happy to do a phone interview with this guy.  But I won't pay for
him to fly down.
---------------------- Forwarded by John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron on 10/13/2000
12:59 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Jean Mrha                           10/13/2000 12:35 PM

To: John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: David Oxley/HOU/ECT@ECT, David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: A junior trader's resume

John,

Terrell Benke was a summer Associate from the University of Chicago who has
just accepted Enron's full-time employment offer.  Erik, her husband,
currently works at Goldman Sachs as a junior trader in Chicago.  Therefore,
since Terrell will be moving to Houston, Erik is very interested in pursuing
potential trading opportunities at Enron.

Please look at his resume and inform me if you have any interest in his
background.

Regards,

Jean
---------------------- Forwarded by Jean Mrha/NA/Enron on 10/13/2000 12:15 PM
---------------------------

"Erik Benke" <ebenke@math.georgetown.edu> on 10/11/2000 07:00:38 AM
Please respond to <ebenke@math.georgetown.edu>
To: <jean.mrha@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Resume

Jean,
Here is my resume. I would like to interview and meet people in natural gas
or electricity.  My sense is that's the best place to start at Enron. You
can reply to this e-mail or reach me at home at 773-667-6740 if you need to
get in touch with me.
Thanks,
Erik

 - ErikBenkeResume.doc


The Maintenance has been completed.
Capacity for Thoreau West System was increased for ID-1 cycle for Gas Day 17, 2001.
Capacity was increased from 920,000 mmbtu/d to 1.100,000 bcf/d.
Posted to the web site.

Thanks DS


Sharon Brown
ETS Gas Control
713-853-5660


Sibyl:  We are faxing docs now.  Sara

Sara Shackleton
Enron Wholesale Services
1400 Smith Street, EB3801a
Houston, TX  77002
Ph:  (713) 853-5620
Fax: (713) 646-3490

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Peyer, Sibyl" <sibyl.peyer@gs.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, November 06, 2001 1:13 PM
To:	Shackleton, Sara
Subject:	RE: new account agreement

Tried to call with more questions:
Where is the money coming from?
Why is this trade being done out of this entity and not Enron Corp like the
others?

-----Original Message-----
From: Peyer, Sibyl
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 1:42 PM
To: 'Shackleton, Sara'
Subject: RE: new account agreement

Hi Sara
No one here seems to know anything about ERMT Corp.
Can you confirm it's not a regulated entity?  (Public Utility, etc.)
Can we get a copy of its Cert. of Incorporation (whatever you have in your
files is fine.)
Anything else you can tell me about the activity of the entity would also be
helpful.

Thanks.

-----Original Message-----
From: Shackleton, Sara [mailto:Sara.Shackleton@ENRON.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 12:57 PM
To: Peyer, Sibyl
Subject: new account agreement

Sibyl:

Did you want me to dupe the Enron Corp. documents, i.e., change
signature lines?
I have a copy of the Corporate Account Agreement (including the
Schedule) but not the Repo.

Thanks.  Sara

Sara Shackleton
Enron Wholesale Services
1400 Smith Street, EB3801a
Houston, TX  77002
Ph:  (713) 853-5620
Fax: (713) 646-3490

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Let's try this with the attachment.  Thanks.


Thank you, Lisa!

Sue


The following folders have been moved to \\GTHOU-DV01\Common\TWMarketing.

\\GTHOU-DV01\Common\Marketing\TW_NNG\TW Desk
\\GTHOU-DV01\Common\Marketing\TW_NNG\TW IOS Posting
\\GTHOU-DV01\Common\Marketing\TW_NNG\TW Longterm
\\GTHOU-DV01\Common\Marketing\TW_NNG\Restore TW Desk 020102
\\GTHOU-DV01\Common\Marketing\TW_Flow
\\GTHOU-DV01\Common\Marketing\TWFIN
\\GTHOU-DV01\Common\Marketing\TWHUB

If you have any questions or concerns, please contact me at 713-853-7707 (office) or 877-678-3092 (pager).

Thanks,

glenda wagner
ETS Information Risk Management (Houston)


Mary:

I would like to discuss seminars in Europe to further promote the isda form
among energy companies on the continent.  Please give me a ring at your
convenience.

Regards,

Mark
----- Forwarded by Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT on 04/27/2001 10:48 AM -----

	Mark Evans
	04/27/2001 04:59 AM

		 To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: ISDA SEMINARS

Mark,

Enron Europe's experience is that there is some resistance to ISDA
documentation in most of the European countries in which we are active. Our
list of countries which we feel would benefit from promotional sessions
arranged by ISDA is as follows. The countries are in order ranked by Enron
Europe's view of the significance of the market in each country and where
ISDA resistance is strongest. Most significant market and most resistance
ranked at the top of the list for both Europe and the Far East:

Europe
Germany
Switzerland
Austria
Spain
Nordic countries: Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Finland
Netherlands
Italy
France
Poland
Czech Republic
Hungary

Far East
Singapore
Japan
Hong Kong

Thanks

     Mark


Please disregard and erase the data on Sheet2 Tab in the counterparty list file since they are sensitive data.  Sorry for the inconvenience.

Thanks
Hai

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Chen, Hai
Sent:	Thursday, May 17, 2001 10:11 AM
To:	Sager, Elizabeth; St Clair, Carol
Cc:	Arora, Harry; Stalford, Robert; Alatorre, Carlos
Subject:	counterparty list for option desk

Please call me (x54008) for any question.  Thanks!

Hai

 << File: couterparty list for option desk.xls >>


Kay:

In order to expedite the formation of the escrow account, I am attaching the
signature page to the Escrow Agreement, and ask that you obtain three
executed originals.  Once you have obtained the required signature, please
forward the 3 signature pages to Tremaine Wright at Paul Hastings along with
the executed incumbency certificate, which Kathleen has.  Since we have not
seen the final draft of Escrow Agreement, be sure to tell Tremaine to hold
the signature pages in escrow pending further written instruction from you.
Tremaine will deliver the Escrow Agreement, incumbency certificates, fee
letter, and Form W-9 to Citibank as soon as all the documents are in order.
Tremaine's contact information is listed below:

Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker LLP
399 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10022-4697

Don't hesitate to contact me if you have any questions.

Regards,

Marisa

-----Original Message-----
From: Wright, Tremaine S. [mailto:TremaineWright@paulhastings.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 3:53 PM
To: 'Reuter, Marisa'
Subject: ESCROW AGREEMENT

"paulhastings.com" made the following annotations on 05/30/01 16:52:58
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
NEW E-MAIL ADDRESSES AT PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP

We have changed our e-mail address.  Our new domain name is
paulhastings.com.  In most cases, our address is composed of
conventional first name and last name plus @paulhastings.com.  Here are
two examples: janesmith@paulhastings.com and danjones@paulhastings.com.
If you have any questions, please contact us at noc@paulhastings.com.

============================================================================
==
"The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity
to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you
received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the
material from all computers."

============================================================================
==

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To:
Subject:
Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 17:24:40 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: multipart/mixed ;
boundary="----_=_NextPart_002_01C0E94E.3F41C650"

 - ATT21924.txt
 - ATT21925.htm
 - 7@4S01!.DOC


Would you please forward a copy of our current draft of operating standards
to Shawn?  Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 09/26/2000 06:30 PM
---------------------------

Shawn Kilchrist@ENRON
09/26/2000 01:01 PM
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: ENA minimum standards

You indicated at the meeting with Rick that you have a set of minimum
standards which are being rolling out.  Would you please send me a copy of
those for my reference.

Thanks!

Shawn


CSC is Computer Science Corp.
Joel's number is x57723.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 12/16/99 09:18 AM
---------------------------

Joel Ephross@ENRON
12/15/99 06:44 PM
To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Project Raven -- lastest diagram and draft Amendment docs

---------------------- Forwarded by Joel Ephross/Corp/Enron on 12/15/99 06:41
PM ---------------------------

Scott Donaldson@EES
12/15/99 10:07 AM
To: Joel Ephross/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Project Raven -- lastest diagram and draft Amendment docs

Joel --  attached below is the latest deal diagram which is our understanding
of the structure after discussions with David Barber last night.   Also
attached are the latest drafts of the Amendments.

Call if you want to discuss before our 2:00 o'clock meeting.  We intend to
meet with Barclays later this morning.

Scott  (3-7661x)
pager 888-634-9850

	Enron Energy Services

	From:  Jimmie Williams                           12/10/99 03:02 PM
	Phone No: (713) 853-4278

To: Scott Donaldson/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Re: CSC Amendment

I should have the amendment completed by end of next week.  I had a
conversation with Mike Beebe, President CSC Energy Services, earlier today,
and the only issue they have with the attached amendment (I am forwarding you
the amendments under separate cover) is the changes to the termination on a
change of control by CSC.  I don't think there will be any additional room
for further changes, but we have incorporated the majority of changes
requested by the monetization team.

Call me with questions/concerns.

Jimmie

Scott Donaldson
12/10/99 02:52 PM
To: Jimmie Williams/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Larry Derrett/HOU/EES@EES, Robert Callan/HOU/EES@EES, David
Dye/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: CSC Amendment

Jimmie -- we are proceeding with the securitization.  Wanted to get an update
on the Amendment.

(1) How far along are you with CSC?  Has CSC signed-off on the draft ?
(2) Will the Amendment be executed by year-end?
(3) Is it likely that the termination payment amount (for the Premium Payment
tranche) stay as it is currently drafted?
(4) Do we or the banks have any room to suggest changes?

Please let us know how we can help.   Thanks.....Scott  (3-7661)

---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Donaldson/HOU/EES on 12/13/99 06:56
AM ---------------------------

	Enron Energy Services

	From:  Jimmie Williams                           12/10/99 03:04 PM
	Phone No: (713) 853-4278

To: Scott Donaldson/HOU/EES@EES, Larry Derrett/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Second Amendment to Stock Purchase Agt - 11/8/99.DOC

Amendment to Stock purchase agreement.

Jimmie
---------------------- Forwarded by Jimmie Williams/HOU/EES on 12/10/99 03:03
PM ---------------------------

"Fenelon, Ken" <kfenelon@velaw.com> on 12/06/99 01:55:23 PM

To:	"'mbeebe@csc.com'" <mbeebe@csc.com>
cc:	Deborah Culver/HOU/EES@EES, Jimmie Williams/HOU/EES@EES, "Boeckman, Jim"
<jboeckman@velaw.com>

Subject:	Second Amendment to Stock Purchase Agt - 11/8/99.DOC

 <<99.DOC>> At the request of Deborah Culver and Jimmie Williams I am
sending you a draft of the Second Amendment to Stock Purchase Agreement.

 - 99.DOC

---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Donaldson/HOU/EES on 12/13/99 06:56
AM ---------------------------

	Enron Energy Services

	From:  Jimmie Williams                           12/10/99 03:04 PM
	Phone No: (713) 853-4278

To: Scott Donaldson/HOU/EES@EES, Larry Derrett/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Amendment No. 1 to Services Agreement

Amendment to Services Agreement.

Jimmie
---------------------- Forwarded by Jimmie Williams/HOU/EES on 12/10/99 03:04
PM ---------------------------

"Boeckman, Jim" <jboeckman@velaw.com> on 12/01/99 01:39:07 PM

To:	"'Beebe, Mike (CSC)'" <mbeebe@csc.com>
cc:	Jimmie Williams/HOU/EES@EES, dculver@ees

Subject:	Amendment No. 1 to Services Agreement

At Deborah Culver and Jimmie Williams' request, I am forwarding to you the
attached draft of Amendment No. 1 to the Services Agreement between EESO and
CSC.  Also attached is a version marked to show changes against the original
text from the Services Agreement.

Please contact me if you would like me to forward the attached to your
counsel.

Regards,
Jim Boeckman

 - CSC Amendment No. 1- redlined vs. original.DOC
 - CSC Amendment No. 1.DOC

---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Donaldson/HOU/EES on 12/13/99 06:56
AM ---------------------------

George.McKean@barclayscapital.com on 12/13/99 02:54:08 AM

To:	Scott Donaldson/HOU/EES@EES, Larry Derrett/HOU/EES@EES
cc:	Derek.Rozycki@barclayscapital.com

Subject:	Raven - Questions/Clarifications

 <<Questions 1.doc>>
I will call to discuss

George

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------
For more information about Barclays Capital, please
visit our web site at http://www.barcap.com.

Internet communications are not secure and therefore the Barclays Group
does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message.
Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do
not necessarily represent those of the Barclays Group unless otherwise
specifically stated.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------
 - Questions 1.doc


---------------------- Forwarded by Dana Davis/HOU/ECT on 12/06/2000 11:53 AM
---------------------------

	Lola Willis @ ENRON
	12/06/2000 10:38 AM

To: debra_atkins@co.harris.tx.us, sweetp@netropolis.net, bill481@excite.com,
dana davis@enron.com, Laura Gutierrez/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Are you worth it?

---------------------- Forwarded by Lola Willis/Corp/Enron on 12/06/2000
10:37 AM ---------------------------

"Mims, Valerie" <valerie.mims@bankofamerica.com> on 12/06/2000 09:59:56 AM
To: lola.willis@enron.com, prhusband@shellus.com, "Slaughter, Glenda"
<glenda.slaughter@bankofamerica.com>
cc:

Subject: Are you worth it?

 <<ROLO_1.mpeg>> Saving the last for the best or was that the best for last?
Just wanted to see you smile...Peace!

 - ROLO_1.mpeg


I think he will absolutely love it.  Our wedding is at 4, but we can bring
him over earlier if that helps with the museum trip.

"Brashear, Charlotte" <cbrashear@velaw.com> on 03/15/2001 10:05:00 AM
To: "Mann Kay (E-mail)" <kmann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Sunday

   I hope you don't change your mind about going to the wedding Sunday.
I plan on taking Michael to the new Star Wars exhibit at the Museum of Fine
Arts.  They showed some kids on TV, and they were quite taken with it.
          ++++++CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE+++++
The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged.  This
email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization
named above.  If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized
representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any,
or the information contained herein is prohibited.  If you have received
this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email
and delete this email from your system.  Thank You


Adele and Maria:
The date of the earliest outstanding trade is 11/29/99 so that is what I
think we should date the docs.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)


Hey guys.  I'm cleaning up my emails and I don't know if this was ever
addressed.

Comments?
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 04/10/2000 05:50
PM ---------------------------

Scott Goodell@ENRON
03/14/2000 07:24 AM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Continuation of Assignment of Capacity

Doug Kinney would be the first person to start with.

Chris Germany@ECT
03/14/2000 07:07 AM
To: Molly LaFuze/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
hboyd@columbiaenergygroup.com
cc:

Subject: Re: Continuation of Assignment of Capacity

My sources tell me this means NIMO will continue to assign CES CNG capacity
unless CES can prove they have primary firm to NIMO.  What I'm not sure of is
will NIMO start assigning CES the upstream Tetco capacity.

Scott, who at CES worked with NIMO on the capacity elections?

Molly LaFuze
03/10/2000 02:37 PM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Continuation of Assignment of Capacity

Does this affect us?  If so, how?  Thanks Chris.

---------------------- Forwarded by Molly LaFuze/HOU/ECT on 03/10/2000 02:33
PM ---------------------------

hboyd@columbiaenergygroup.com on 03/10/2000 07:58:31 AM
To: " - *molly.lafuze@enron.com" <molly.lafuze@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Continuation of Assignment of Capacity

Hi Molly,

I don't know if this will effect Enron or not - I don't even know if Columbia
Energy had any firm capacity off of CNG released through NIMO, but just in
case, I though you might like to know about this.

Sorry I am not much of a help here.

Thanks!
---------------------- Forwarded by Heidi Boyd/CES/ColumbiaGas on 03/10/2000
08:55 AM ---------------------------

bartlettd2@NiagaraMohawk.com on 03/10/2000 08:35:36 AM
Please respond to bartlettd2@NiagaraMohawk.com

To: rourkec@NiagaraMohawk.com, mimasd@NiagaraMohawk.com, kperry@utilicorp.com,
ehaley@UtiliCorp.com, rbelak@txuenergy.com, ahunt@txuenergy.com,
toddlou@mirabitofuel.com, drusso@superior.net, mcasas@statoilenergy.com,
porterr@selectenergy.com, guginda@selectenergy.com, dgordon@nge.com,
dstreed@naenergy.com, danchakr@nmenergy.com, lpohlman@nfrinc.com,
NAU87@aol.com, NAU87@aol.com, mhogan@naecyork.com, dgilbert@naecyork.com,
Nattygas@aol.com, jbarker@enron.com, lepcorp@localnet.com,
mking@energetix.net,
end.nat@cwix.com, tom@empirenatgas.com, josh@econnergy.com,
saulh@econnergy.com, mfvolkman@duke-energy.com, Kelly.Heine@mcnenergy.com,
Heidi Boyd/CES/ColumbiaGas@COLUMBIAGAS, ddepetris@hess.com,
lross@allenergy.com, rmiller2@AGWAY.COM, mpitonzo@agway.com,
dlstilwell@agfdirectgas.com
cc: baileyj@NiagaraMohawk.com

Subject: Continuation of Assignment of Capacity

March 10, 2000

SENT VIA FAX, E-MAIL & WEBSITE

NOTICE TO ALL MARKETERS PARTICIPATING IN BALANCED AGGREGATION:

In accordance with P.S.C. No. 218 Gas Tariff, Leaf No. 184.2, Niagara Mohawk
will continue to assign CNG capacity unless a final determination in the gas
rate case precludes Niagara Mohawk from such assignment.

If you filed an Affidavit of Firm Transportation Capacity with Niagara Mohawk
last fall and the contract number for the capacity is still valid, Niagara
Mohawk will continue to honor that contract and will not release CNG capacity
to
you.  However, if the contract has expired, you must either re-submit an
Affidavit with a valid contract number or Niagara Mohawk will assign CNG
capacity to you.   The Affidavits are due Niagara Mohawk by the 25th of March,
2000.  Capacity will be assigned the week of March 20th for the month of
April.

If you have any questions, please call Dennis Bartlett at 315-460-4042 or me
at
315-460-4041.  Thank you.

                                   Janice Bailey
                                   Manager Transportation Services
                                   Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation


----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 08/11/2000 11:35 AM -----

	Kay Young
	08/11/2000 11:27 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: CA

Sara:  I did a conflicts search and did not find anything pertaining to
American Fiber Resources or AFR,
Kay

Kay C. Young
Legal Specialist
713-853-6794 Phone
713-646-3393 Fax
kay.young@enron.com

----- Forwarded by Kay Young/HOU/ECT on 08/11/2000 11:26 AM -----

	Kimberly Bullock
	08/11/2000 11:23 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Kay Young/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: CA

Hi Susan,

Please put together our general Confidentiality Agreement and ISDA Agreement
and send to the following:

AFR (American Fiber Resources)
Attn:  Robert C. Garland, President and CFO
701 Fourth Avenue
PO Box 277
Menominee, MI 49858
(906) 864-9120
(906) 863-2491-fax
Email:  RGarland@GLPF.com

Should you have questions please call Glenn Connors, ext  3-6324.  Thank you.


Attached is the weekly (or, of late, bi-weekly) update of events at the
CPUC.  Call if you have any questions.

 <<X20615.DOC>>

Jeanne Bennett

 - X20615.DOC


Yes, to North America, Australia and Japan.

	Karen Lambert
	09/07/2000 04:30 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Online Weather Trading

Does this apply only to the North American contracts and weather trades for
which you are responsible?
Does the instruction below apply to Australia and Japan ISDA's?

From: Tana Jones on 09/07/2000 12:17 PM
To: Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Tackett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Online Weather Trading

Per my conversations with Mark Taylor, we should continue to put any weather
trades done online under any relevant master agreement with the
counterparty.  Further, there is no prohibition against doing a trade online
with a counterparty when we do not have a master in place.  Any non-master
trades would go under the respective GTC.  It appears to be only a
coincidence that we are trading online only with counterparties we have
masters in place with.


I have one more thing to add to the list of Enpower requests:

Deals done under the EPMI Short Term West Hourly desk do not need to be confirmed. The Real Time traders know they need to check "No" in the Confirmation box in Deal Entry; however, it's one detail amidst many that sometimes gets overlooked. It occurred to me that we could avoid the problem of Real Time deals getting unnecessarily confirmed - and unnecessarily confusing counterparties - if we could make "No confirmation" an automatic default for all deals entered under the Short Term West Hourly book.

I can't think of any other groups which would be adversely impacted by this change, but let's discuss that during the next Enpower meeting. Please let me know what we can do to get this implemented.

Thanks for your help,
Kate


- toocute (1).jpg


Kira Radtke
3135 Laurel Street
New Orleans, LA 70115
kirazoe@msn.com

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

Kira Radtke


fyi
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 11/16/2000 05:57 AM -----

	Shelley Corman
	11/15/2000 08:58 AM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Drew
Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Maria Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michael
Moran/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Mkt Affiliate Implications: Reorganization of Houston and Omaha
Facilities Management Responsibilities

Enron Energy Services is presently a marketing affiliate of several of the
Enron pipelines because EES: (1) buys/sells gas; and (2) holds transport
contracts on our pipelines.

Under the FERC's standards of conduct, the pipelines cannot: (1) share
transportation information or shipper information with EES; (2) must function
independently and keep separate books and records.  Generally, I don't see
the FERC having any problem with mechanical, electrical, air-conditioning
types of services.  However; there are 2 specific concerns that arise with
respect to the described arrangement under the FERC's marketing affiliate
standards of conduct:

1. Records -- FERC has ruled that giving a marketing affiliate "access" to
transportation and shipper records (including something as simple as file
room access) is deemed to be impermissibly sharing the information with a
marketing affiliate in violation of the standards. Thus, it seems to me that
EES will explicitly not be able to perform any records management function
for NNG, TW or NBPL.

2. Billing -  FERC scrutinizes intercompany charges carefully.  In a recent
Kinder-Morgan consent order, the FERC used payroll and intercompany charge
records to make the case that the pipeline and marketing affiliate did not
operate separately.  It would be helpful if any EES facility management
charges/allocations come from Enron Facility Services (not EES) --  leaving
us room to argue that the facility management subsidiary involves separate
functions and staff than the EES subsidiary that is a marketing affiliate.

	From:  Steve Kean & Bill Donovan                           11/14/2000 06:36 PM

Sent by: Enron Announcements
To: All Enron Houston
cc:

Subject: Reorganization of Houston and Omaha Facilities Management
Responsibilities

Responsibility  for daily operations of building support services in the
Enron Building, Houston leased offices, and Two Pacific Place (Omaha) will be
transitioning from Corporate to Enron Energy Services (EES) by year-end.  The
areas affected include facility operations and maintenance of mechanical,
electrical, and air-conditioning systems; mail delivery;  housekeeping;
food, copier, and records services.

This transition of services, as presently managed by Enron Property and
Services Corp. (EPSC), is designed to optimize value to Enron,s Business
Units by leveraging facility management businesses now offered by EES to
their commercial customers.  EPSC staff having administrative responsibility
for these services will report to Enron Facility Services, a subsidiary of
EES,s Global Energy Services group led by Daniel Leff, President and CEO.

EPSC is responsible for Enron,s internal real estate and office development
needs, including leasing, space allocations and facility planning, project
and construction management, furniture systems, and office relocation.  EPSC,
in its development role, remains a part of Enron Corporate Administration
Services (ECAS) along with Corporate Security and the Aviation Department,
reporting to Bill Donovan, Vice President, Corporate Administrative Services.

This alignment of responsibilities offers the opportunity for EPSC to focus
resources on effective utilization of our existing office space assets and
managing the development of Houston,s new Enron Center Campus project.


I appreciate all the work you did for us!   Mark


I will be on jury duty on Thursday, Jan. 24.  If we are released early, I will be taking the remainder of the day as vacation.
FYI - I will also be taking Feb. 5 (Tuesday) & 15 (Friday) as vacation days.

Kerry


Hey!

There is a new spreadsheet with all our BPA Account numbers summarised in a
PIVOT table. The file is in P:RealTime/RT BPA ACCOUNT #'S. By filtering by
individual source, sink , Type (Firm / Non Firm) you will get the account
number. Make sure all is not selected in any of the fields as this can give
you an invalid account number.

Geir


Mark and Steve,

I have previously forwarded to you the Gramm changes that I received from Ken
Raisler.  I recognise that we want to be extremely cautious about suggesting
that we support any of the changes.  Nonetheless, it may be worthwhile going
through the changes to see if they are beneficial to Enron.

For example, the changes being made to solve the "Blackbird Issue" (see p. 29
and 30 of Gramm's changes) seem to be beneficial for Enron Online.  Also,
Gramm's Swap exclusion language of section 107 seems broader than the
existing language.

If Gramm were to ask Ken Lay if we were supportive of these changes how would
we respond?  I have a hunch our response is that a perfect bill would be
ideal, but it is not likely that such a goal is attainable in this Congress
or the next Congress.  Nonetheless, I would appreciate help listing the
changes that are helpful to enron and those we just don't care about.

Tom


Vince,
I was brought to my attention that an interesting Real Option conference
is taking place in March 27-28. I would like to attend this conference
if possible.

Thanks.
Alex


what is the minimum number of shirts?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Carol Measom" <c.measom@tjmhou.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Wednesday, October 17, 2001 5:13 PM
To:	Shankman, Jeffrey A.
Subject:	RE: Can you help me?

The custom shirt promo is starting again on Monday.  It's really good
timing.  When would you like to pick some out?  P.S. Some new shirtings just
arrived.

------------
Carol Measom
Tom James Company of Houston
4605 Post Oak Place Drive, #200
Houston, Texas 77027
713.622.5678, ext 124
www.tomjamesco.com

Learn more about me at:
http://www.tomjames.com/asp/biopage.asp?empidn=05568

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeffrey.A.Shankman@enron.com [mailto:Jeffrey.A.Shankman@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 4:55 PM
To: c.measom@tjmhou.com
Subject: RE: Can you help me?

Hi Carol, I was thinking about a few more shirts.  You really need to have
a referral discount or some other incentive program for your clients.  It
may help.

Jeff

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   "Carol Measom" <c.measom@tjmhou.com>@ENRON
   Sent:   Wednesday, October 17, 2001 3:58 PM
   To:     c.measom@tjmhou.com
   Subject:  Can you help me?

   I was wondering if you might be able to help me.  I need to finish
   strong
   this year.  I am attempting to reach the goal of $336,000 in clothing
   sales
   by the end of the year.  Obviously, no single client will be able to
   help me
   do this.  So I was wondering if you might be able to help me out by
   giving
   me the names of some qualified gentlemen or ladies that might be
   interested
   in the type of service we offer.

   Some things to consider:

   We offer ready-made (off the rack) clothing as well as custom.
   We offer all types of men's clothing including casual.

   If you know of some mid to upper level executive women, they may have an
   interest as well.

   Some memory joggers:

   Who is the best dressed man or woman you know?
   Who do you know that likes nice cars?
   Who do you know that owns their own company?
   Who do you know that is successful in sales?
   Who do you know that wears an expensive watch?
   Who do you know that owns their own airplane?
   Who do you know that might have a hard time fitting in typical clothing?

   Thanks for your help!

   --------------------------
   Carol Measom
   Tom James Company of Houston
   4605 Post Oak Place Drive, #200
   Houston, Texas 77027
   713.622.5678, ext 124
   www.tomjamesco.com

   Learn more about me at:
   http://www.tomjames.com/asp/biopage.asp?empidn=05568

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Hitchcock, Dorie
Sent:	Tuesday, October 02, 2001 3:51 PM
To:	Adams, Suzanne; Arap, Sami; Brownfeld, Gail; Bushman, Teresa G.; Cash, Michelle; Corbet, Nancy; Culver, Deborah; Davis, Angela; Del vecchio, Peter; Dietrich, Sarah; Elbertson, Janette; Essandoh, Edwin; George, Carolyn; Dickson, Stacy E.; Gray, Barbara N.; Gregory, Sarah; Hansen, Leslie; Harkness, Cynthia; Keller, James; Keyser, Marty; Koehler, Anne C.; Lindeman, Cheryl; Mann, Kay; Martinez, Vicky; McCarrel, Steven; Mellencamp, Lisa; Mendoza, Miguel; Moore, Janet H.; Murray, Julia; Nelson, Cheryl; Nissan, Limor; Leite, Francisco Pinto; Rasmussen, Dale; Rivera, Coralina; Rossi, Robbi; Shackleton, Sara; Simmons, Linda J.; Taylor, Mark E (Legal); Tweed, Sheila; Krenz, William
Subject:	SPA TREATMENT

You are receiving this message because you have selected "Spa" as your activity on Friday afternoon, October 12 during the Legal Conference at The Woodlands Resort & Conference Center.

Please choose one (1) treatment from the options listed below and e-mail your selection to me by
Thursday, October 4, 2001.

_____	Basic Facial (45 minutes)

__ [Taylor, Mark]  X ___	Body Massage (30 minutes)

_____	Pedicure and Fingernail Polish Change

A list of treatment times will be distributed once the appointments have been confirmed.

Thank you.

Dorie Hitchcock
Event Manager
Enron
1400 Smith Street
Suite 3640a
Houston, TX  77002
Telephone:  (713) 853-6978
Fax:  (713) 646-5800
Cell:  (713) 594-7093
E-Mail:  dorie.hitchcock@enron.com


Daniel,

I do remember working on an assignment agreement regarding the assignment of
the Columbia Energy contracts with MSCGI  to Enron North America Corp.  I
will need to find the document.

It is my understanding that, with the exception of one deal, all the deals
between ENA and MSCGI are firm deals of greater than one month duration.  ENA
uses the GISB for month or less firm deals and interruptible deals of any
length as recommended by the Gas Industry Standards Board.  For firm deals
that are longer than one month, ENA uses a master firm agreement if one
exists.  If there is no master firm agreement, we send out our General Terms
and Conditions with our confirmation.  That answers your question of why
Ellen sent our GTC when there is a GISB in place.

It appears to me that you and I need to work on getting a master firm
agreement in place.  Please let me know your thoughts.

Stacy

	Daniel Garcia <Daniel.Garcia@msdw.com>
	03/13/2001 01:54 PM
	Please respond to Daniel.Garcia

		 To: stacy.e.dickson@enron.com
		 cc: "Hansen, Marie" <Marie.Hansen@msdw.com>, "Hart, Deborah"
<Deborah.Hart@msdw.com>
		 Subject: Enron GISB

Stacy,

The pieces of the puzzle are starting to fall into place.? Thank you for the
fax of the Columbia Energy GISB.

Please note that we have a Transfer and Termination Agreement (dated January
1, 2000), whereby certain Columbia Energy financial and purchase & sale
agreements were terminated by Enron North America Corp.? The Columbia Energy
GISB was not referenced in the Transfer and Termination Agreement, so I'm
assuming the GISB survived the termination process.

Did our two companies enter into an assignment & novation agreement, or other
similar document, specific to the Columbia Energy GISB?

Also, please let me know what conclusion you and Ellen have reached in regard
to the long-form/GTC issue.? I thank you for your help.

Kind Regards,
Dan
212-761-8660


per my voicemail
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 05/25/2001
01:33 PM ---------------------------

"Wenner, Adam" <awenner@velaw.com> on 05/25/2001 09:28:18 AM
To: "Kean, Steven (Enron Corp.)" <skean@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Governor Davis' Power Grab

Steve - per my voicemail, before we released this article that I prepared,
we wanted to run it by you to make sure that Enron is comfortable with it.
Thanks, Adam.
          ++++++CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE+++++
The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged.  This
email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization
named above.  If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized
representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any,
or the information contained herein is prohibited.  If you have received
this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email
and delete this email from your system.  Thank You
 <<143590_1.DOC>>

 - 143590_1.DOC


Please forward this e-mail to your teams regarding recent organizational
changes within Gas Operations.


Tana,

Attached please find a cws for a Master ISDA Agreement between ENA and
Bellingham Cold Storage.  Please call with any questions.

Regards,
Tracy
x3-0554


Great, I am very happy you are a supporter.
m

Andy Zipper@ENRON
09/11/2000 10:08 AM
To: Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Juvenile Diabetes Foundation Fundraising

The Zipper family participates through Tina Cohoe in New York City who is a
family friend and on the board.


Daily Blessing

http://www.daily-blessings.com/bless142.htm

The Dream

http://www.daily-blessings.com/humor45.htm

FORGET PC PHONE. GET REAL LONG DISTANCE AT NO COST bigredwire is the
first and only company to offer REAL long distance at no cost
Switch your long distance to bigredwire and get REAL long distance at
zero cost to you. Up to 100 complimentary minutes everyday when you zap
your online bill. If you don't zap, pay only 5 cents a minute without
fees. Switch now!
find out how at http://www.daily-blessings.com/cjbigredwire.htm

how about your $10,000 no-cost-to you insurance?  can't beat it!!
http://www.daily-blessings.com/insurance.htm

need ink for your printer...here are the best prices in town on ink
cartridges and refills.

http://www.daily-blessings.com/inkman.htm

<<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>>
* To remove yourself from this mailing list, point your browser to:
http://inbound.postmastergeneral.com/remove?dailyblessings:10
* Enter your email address (judy.hernandez@enron.com) in the field
provided and click "Unsubscribe". The mailing list ID is "dailyblessings:10".

OR...

* Reply to this message with the word "remove" in the subject line.

This message was sent to address judy.hernandez@enron.com
X-PMG-Recipient: judy.hernandez@enron.com
<<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>>


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 05/08/2001 10:50 AM ---------------------------

Darla Saucier@ENRON
05/07/2001 04:15 PM
To:	Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:	4/2001 New Power

For your review, sir.  Please let me know if this is good to go!

Thanks!


The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  ? 2001 Carr Futures

The charts are now available on the web by clicking on the hot link(s)
contained in this email. If for any reason you are unable to receive the
charts via the web, please contact me via email and I will email the charts
to you as attachments.

Distillate     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hoil78.pdf
Unleaded     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/unlded78.pdf

Daily Energy Letter
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/Energy-Letter2-6-02.pdf


Yes.  Their lawyer.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ralston, Andrew
Sent:	Thursday, November 01, 2001 2:37 PM
To:	Heard, Marie
Cc:	Sacks, Edward; Bernstein, Mark; mbrown9@enron.com
Subject:	Re: Master Netting Agreement Forms

Marie

Is this a Constellation person that this was sent to?

Andrew Ralston

From:	Marie Heard/ENRON@enronXgate on 11/01/2001 02:29 PM
To:	rosteen@powersrc.com@SMTP@enronXgate
cc:	Edward Sacks/ENRON@enronXgate, Andrew Ralston/HOU/EES@EES
Subject:	Master Netting Agreement Forms

Per Ed Sacks' request, I am attaching a copy of our form Master Netting, Setoff and Security Agreement and Collateral Annex.

		 << File: Master Netting & Security Agmnt 10 h-1.doc >> 	 << File: Master Netting Agreement Credit Support Annex 10 d.doc >>


Can I please have your mailing address?  Don't worry, nothing bad will
happen, I promise.

Thanks


Enron is forming a new organization - - the Enron Xcelerator - - to drive the
formation and development of new businesses at Enron.  Enron's unique ability
to start and develop new businesses has driven most of our growth over the
years.  Lou L. Pai, currently Chairman and CEO of Enron Energy Services, will
lead the Xcelerator.  Over his years at Enron, Lou has been key to the
creation and rapid growth of our wholesale gas, wholesale power and energy
service businesses.  The existing business units will continue their
development of core businesses, while the Xcelerator will be responsible for
developing new business opportunities that are natural extensions of Enron's
business model and core skills, but not currently under development elsewhere
in Enron.

Dave Delainey, currently President and CEO of Enron Americas, will become
Chairman and CEO of Enron Energy Services.  Dave brings a wealth of
experience and accomplishment from Enron Wholesale Services' businesses where
he led the growth of our Canadian business and our North American origination
activity and, most recently, had a great year in Enron Americas.

Dave is forming an Office of the Chairman in EES.  Joining Dave in the Office
of the Chairman are Dan Leff, President of EES, Global Energy Services, and
Marty Sunde, President of EES, Global Marketing and Services.  Dan and Marty
have been instrumental in the development and execution of the successful EES
business model.  Also joining the Office of the Chairman of EES is Janet
Dietrich as Chief Operating Officer.  Janet, currently is Managing Director
in Enron Americas, where she has been successful in many of Enron Wholesale's
core businesses, including gas trading, risk management and structural
origination.  Tom White will continue as Vice Chairman of EES and will focus
on the development and expansion of EES' customer relationships.  Lou, Tom,
Dan, Marty and the entire EES organization have developed a great business
model with great growth prospects.  EES has become an essential part of
Enron's market valuation and growth story.  This new leadership structure
will enable EES to continue on its path of sustained growth and increasing
profitability.

John Lavorato will succeed Dave as President and CEO of Enron Americas.  John
has been an essential part of Enron's energy trading success over the years
and is a key part of Enron Wholesale Services' continuing success story.
Joining John is Louise Kitchen, currently President and CEO of Enron
NetWorks.  Louise, who accelerated Enron's outstanding growth with the
deployment of EnronOnline, will take over as Chief Operating Officer of Enron
Americas.

Philippe Bibi, currently Chief Operating Officer of Enron NetWorks will take
over as President and CEO of Enron NetWorks.  Under Philippe's leadership,
Enron has become a technology leader and the leading e-commerce company.
Joining Philippe as Chief Operating Officer is Greg Piper, currently Managing
Director of Enron NetWorks.  Greg currently leads Enron NetWork's origination
activity and was responsible for the creation and deployment of ClickPaper,
Enron's successful online pulp and paper marketplace.

Please join us in congratulating all of these individuals on their
achievements and their new responsibilities.


<<MF August 27th 2001.pdf>>

			Good Monday Morning - Comments From The Local Guys!

Today, we thought that we would repeat some of the comments made by Jeff
Applegate, Lehman Brothers' US Investment Strategist this morning. In
summary, Jeff
reiterates that "a turning point in the earnings cycle is at hand" and this,
along " with attractive valuation and accommodative policy" should help
propel the market to the 1450 year-end S&P 500 price target. In fact, late
on Thursday, the market received some unaccustomed news - that being that
bell-wether networking
firm, Cisco Systems, was seeing signs of its business conditions
stabilizing. The U.S. stock market showed us on Friday that a little
evidence of corporate business stability could go a long way towards leading
the market higher. As Jeff says: " Indeed, the broader stock market reaction
confirmed that it is still discounting deep reservations around the
prospects for an earnings recovery in the quarters ahead". Despite the rally
on Friday, Jeff still feels that the market closed 16 percent below Lehman's
fair value on forward P/E ratio model. Just when no-one expects the market
to rally, it most likely will.

The 30 -year bond yield is 5.46%.
The 10-year is trading at 4.92%.
The 5-year is trading at 4.48%.
Spot crude oil is trading at $26.62 p/b.
Natural Gas - Henry Hub -  is trading at $2.55 p/mcf.

			AD Time:

New Federal Insider-Trading Rule (Rule 10b5-1) has been adopted by the SEC
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. This rule greatly enhances an
insider's/employee's ability to trade his/her corporate shares during
blackout periods.
Previously, without the protection of this new SEC rule, employees and
insiders could safely trade only outside of designated blackout windows.
Under this new rule, insiders/employees may have the ability to purchase and
sell their corporate shares even during blackout periods if a written plan
was established and in force when the insider/employee was not in possession
of material, non-public information.
The new rule contains other restrictions and should be reviewed carefully.
Lehman Brothers has established a turn-key plan that take into account the
regulatory procedures for establishing such a plan.    Please email us or
call us for more information.

			Lehman's Research

FOCUS STOCKS

PNC Financial Services Gp(PNC) 2 - Buy H. Dickson, .212.526.5659
PNC: Meetings with Management
OLD NEW STREET P/E
Price: $67.1 EPS 2000 N/A $4.31 N/A N/A
52 Wk Ra: $76 - 55 EPS 2001 $4.25E $4.25E $4.25E 15.8
Mkt Cap: $19.6B EPS 2002 $4.65E $4.65E $4.78E 14.4
FY: 12/31 Price Target $75 $75
Rank 2 2
*We believe PNC is close to, if not at, the end point for downward EPS
revisions in this cycle. We continue to rate PNC 2 - Buy.
*Management appears to continue to focus on eliminating high risk activities
at PNC and steps should be taken to reduce the volatility
of private equity in the second half of 2001. Business conditions appear
stronger in Blackrock and PFPC than PNC Advisors.
*The pace of share repurchase activity should accelerate in 2H01 for the
following reasons: PNC has a substantial amount of excess
capital, it is generating lots of free capital flow, it has 12mm shares
remaining to repurchase under its existing authorization, and
there does not appear to be any large acquisitions requiring capital in the
near term.
*We think the success of the Regional Community Bank and its large
contribution to PNC (53% in 2Q01) will eventually force mgmt
to reconsider how aggressively they want to grow the business.

AmeriSource Health(AAS) 1 - Strong Buy L. Marsh, .212.526.5315
SUCCESS! Several implications w/ AAS/BBC combo
OLD NEW STREET P/E
Price: $61 EPS 2000 N/A $1.89 N/A N/A
52 Wk Ra: $63 - 32 EPS 2001 $2.27E $2.27E $2.27E 26.9
Mkt Cap: $3.2B EPS 2002 $2.70E $2.70E $2.71E 22.6
FY: 9/30 Price Target $68 $68
Rank 1 1
*We received good news from the FTC late on Friday - a unanimous decision to
allow the proposed merg. of Amerisource/Bergen to
proceed
*We are providing several follow-up observations from this determination,
after our more detailed commentary of speculation and
next-steps on Friday morning.
*We highlight three implications of some note: 1) greater visibility into
our raised targets on AAS (implied into BBC) and perhaps
above; 2) an updraft into now #4 player DKWD, closer to our $54 target, and
3) greater visibility of medical-supply platforms of
expansion into the future.
*If we were to suggest the FTC blocking of industry mergers in 1998 led to
several instances of irrational behavior and challenges
moves of diversification, we would believe that 2001's consolidation keeps
broader-based distractions to a minimum. As such,
despite what has been attractive appreciation in shares so far in 2001 (up
22%), we look for solid near-term envir. to continue.

FirstEnergy Corp(FE) 1 - Strong Buy D. Ford, .212.526.0836
Merger Approval Uncertainty Subsiding
OLD NEW STREET P/E
Price: $30.74 EPS 2000 N/A $2.69 N/A N/A
52 Wk Ra: $33 - 23 EPS 2001 $2.90E $2.90E $2.84E 10.6
Mkt Cap: $0.0MM EPS 2002 $3.20E $3.65E $3.23E 8.4
FY: 12/31 Price Target $37 $40
Rank 1 1
*With a New Jersey merger settlement in hand, approval uncertainty has
mostly cleared. We see upside to $40 for FE which when
combined with a 4.9% yield is 35% total return potential.
*On 8/24 FE, merger partner GPU, and other key parties reached a merger
settlement. We look for NJ approval in September, SEC
approval in October, and deal closing by early November.
*FE will retain merger synergies though agreed to limitations on employee
reductions and will reduce a power cost deferral balance by
$300M.
*We are raising our 2002E $0.45/share to $3.65 to reflect the absence of
goodwill under new accounting rules. We look for the GPU
deal to be modestly accretive in the first year. FE estimates $1.6B of
synergies over 10 years.
*FE is a great value at only 8.4x our 2002E which is a 20%+ group discount.
Our $40 target is 11x our $3.65 2002E.

COMPANY/INDUSTRY UPDATES

Mortgage Finance B. Harting, .212.526.3007
Stocks Trade Down in Mortgage Finance "Perfect Storm"
*Our sector traded down sharply on Friday, as a convergence of several
events created what we consider an irrational sell-off. We do
not believe that now is the time to exit the group, and feel that last
week's weakness has presented investors with a buying
opportunity. We reiterate our 1-Strong Buy ratings on Washington Mutual,
Golden West, Golden State, Greenpoint, Sovereign,
Charter One, and Astoria.

David C. Morris
Sr. VP Lehman Brothers
713-652-7112/800-227-4537
dcmorris@lehman.com

Disclosure Legend: A-Lehman Brothers Inc. managed or co-managed within the
past three years a public offering of securities for this company. B-An
employee of Lehman Brothers Inc. is a director of this company. C-Lehman
Brothers Inc. makes a market in the securities of this company. G-The
Lehman Brothers analyst who covers this company also has position in its
securities.
Key to Investment Rankings: This is a guide to expected total return (price
performance plus dividend) relative to the total return of the stock's local
market over the next 12 months. 1 = Buy (expected to outperform the market
by 15 or more percentage points); 2=Outperform (expected to outperform
the market by 5-15 percentage points); 3=Neutral (expected to perform in
line with the market, plus or minus 5 percentage points); 4=Underperform
(expected to underperform the market by 5-15 percentage points); 5=Sell
(expected to underperform the market by 15 or more percentage points);
V=Venture (return over multiyear time frame consistent with venture capital;
should only be held in a well-diversified portfolio).
This document is for information purposes only. We do not represent that
this information is complete or accurate. All opinions are subject to
change.
The securities mentioned may not be eligible for sale in some states or
countries. This document has been prepared by Lehman Brothers Inc., Member
SIPC, on behalf of Lehman Brothers International (Europe), which is
regulated by the SFA. ?Lehman Brothers, Inc.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the designated recipient(s) named above.  If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited.  This communication is for information purposes only and should not be regarded as an offer to sell or as a solicitation of an offer to buy any financial product, an official confirmation of any transaction, or as an official statement of Lehman Brothers.  Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free.  Therefore, we do not represent that this information is complete or accurate and it should not be relied upon as such.  All information is subject to change without notice.

 - MF August 27th 2001.pdf


Thanks Steve.  All contacted, included the drafter, said your insert was
reasonable and acceptable.

Steven J Kean@EES
07/21/2000 12:17 PM
To: Cynthia Sandherr/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, dwatkiss@bracepatt.com@ENRON,
cingebretson@bracepatt.com@ENRON

Subject: Re: FW: RTO/market power discussion document

In the underscored language added to the RTO section I would insert "access
to" between the words "planning" and "maintenance".

Cynthia Sandherr@ENRON
07/20/2000 06:22 AM

To: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
dwatkiss@bracepatt.com, cingebretson@bracepatt.com
cc:
Subject: FW: RTO/market power discussion document

---------------------- Forwarded by Cynthia Sandherr/Corp/Enron on 07/20/2000
07:30 AM ---------------------------

"Kanner, Marty" <mkanner@kannerandassoc.com> on 07/19/2000 07:09:20 PM
To: "Jane Dunn Cirrincione (E-mail)" <jcirrincione@APPAnet.org>, "Deborah
Sliz (E-mail)" <dsliz@morganmeguire.com>, "Mark Yacker (E-mail)"
<myacker@elcon.org>, "Cynthia Sandherr (E-mail)"
<cynthia.sandherr@enron.com>, "Cynthia Bogorad (E-mail)"
<BogoradC@spiegelmcd.com>, "Gene Peters (E-mail)" <gpeters@epsa.org>
cc:

Subject: FW: RTO/market power discussion document

I sent the following to Andy Black in order to ensure that we also discuss
the RTO/market power issues.  I'll bring copies to the meeting.  Please feel
free to take issue with the language.

Marty Kanner
Kanner and Associates
122 C Street, NW
Suite 500
202-347-6625 - phone
202-347-6605 - fax
www.kannerandassoc.com <http://www.kannerandassoc.com>

-----Original Message-----
From: Kanner, Marty
Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2000 7:07 PM
To: Andy Black (E-mail)
Cc: Catherine Van Way (E-mail); Curry Hagerty (E-mail); Joe Kelliher
(E-mail); Bob Bolster (E-mail); Ramsen Betfarhad (E-mail); Rick Kessler
(E-mail); Sue Sheridan (E-mail)
Subject: RTO/market power discussion document

Andy -

Thanks again for allowing me to participate in this afternoon's discussion.
As I mentioned, I believe discussions of transmission issues must include
both jurisdictional and RTO.  I understand that the RTO discussion is more
difficult in the absence of paper.  For that reason, I have taken the
liberty of drafting language that I believe mirrors (at least my view) of
one possible construct of RTO Proposal I.

I hope you find this helpful.  I will bring copies to our meeting tomorrow.

 <<rto mp amend for barton discussion.doc>>

Marty Kanner
Kanner and Associates
122 C Street, NW
Suite 500
202-347-6625 - phone
202-347-6605 - fax
www.kannerandassoc.com <http://www.kannerandassoc.com>

 - rto mp amend for barton discussion.doc


Since it sounds like we are getting close to signing the Momentum agreements,
I am forwarding to you a list of questions related to your plant.? This is
information that we will be required to submit to the FERC in our
application.? If you have any questions, please feel free to give me a call.
We will need this information as soon as possible.

Lando

 <<nonjurisdictionalfacilities.doc>>

 - nonjurisdictionalfacilities.doc


Did I get Charles Johnson and Ahman Green?

---------------------- Forwarded by Michael W Morris/HOU/ECT on 11/03/2000
13:17 ---------------------------

Michael W Morris
11/01/2000 15:58
To: Martin Cuilla/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Week 10

I want Charles Johnson PHI and put Kurt Warner STL on IR. I'll bid 15 for
Johnson.

I want Ahman Green GB and cut Tony Martin MIA , I'll bid 50 for Ahman.


I am putting together a comprehensive contact list, but in the interim I wanted to flag two contacts for you to tuck away in your pocket.  I have met and spent time with the CEO of S&P.  I know him through Michael Lewan, one of our DC consultants.  You may know of that S&P is owned by McGraw Hill.  Michael Lewan gave the "Steve Kean" (and #3) of McGraw Hill his very first job in life.  Glenn then introduced me to the CEO of S&P, Leo O'Neill.  Leo is a very approachable person who readily made acquaintances with me b/c of his great fondness for Bob Rubin and Michael Lewan.  Leo told me several stories of how he always "thinks better of" the CEOs who sit down with him and engage in honest conversation when S&P is evaluating its ratings of a company.  That is how Leo got to know Bob; Leo was very impressed with how Bob acted when S&P was contemplating action against Goldman Sachs many years ago.  Second, the recently resigned Head of Enforcement of the SEC is a friend from my gym.  For several years I spent most mornings with him as we shared the same personal trainer.  I am sure Richard hired most if not all of the current SEC enforcement staff.  I am not sure where Richard landed upon his departure, as he wanted to just take time off before starting his next career.  These two contacts are small, but thought you might want to include them in your thinking.  Hope all is well.


Tana,
I keep getting calls from a lady named Kathy at ACES (who is agent for
Wabash) looking for a draft of the ISDA Agreement.  She gave me another
contact for Wabash .... Jill Hoerger at (317) 481-2851.

Kim Theriot


They keep calling.  What do we need to do right now to do the Amgen blend and extend, either paper work or additional collateral?  Let me know soon.

Thanks,

Kim


I have gone to drug test so I will catch up with you tomorrow.

Thanks again,

Doug
Doug-Gilbert Smith


Barbara:
If you could send me a list of people and their cell phone numbers who are
going to the sites as well as exact times that you will be there, I would
appreciate it.  Please let me know if you have any other questions.  Thanks!
Ben


Sara,

On item 1...To my knowledge, the confirms and EOL amendments have a different rounding convention for Power vs. MMBtus.  Gas is 4 places and Power is 3.

Kim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shackleton, Sara
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 6:12 PM
To:	Theriot, Kim S.
Cc:	Hundl, Kimberly
Subject:	FW: New Confirm Template for Financial Power

Kim:  I need to verify that the EOL amendment changes conform to the general financial power template changes.

(1)  The EOL amendment provides that the rounding convention for calculating power Floating Prices relating to MMBtus is rounding to four places; the current financial power template provides for rounding to three decimal places.  Which is the correct convention?

(2)  With respect to corrections to published prices, changes will be required to both the ISDA and GTC formats since the latest EOL amendment does not conform to standard ISDA terminology.  There is no corresponding GTC terminology.

Please let me know about (1) above.  Thanks.  Sara

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hundl, Kimberly
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 5:23 PM
To:	Shackleton, Sara
Subject:	RE: New Confirm Template

Yes, all templates should include language covering corrections to published prices.  On October 9th, I forwarded an email to you requesting your review of that language that we received from Brent Hendry.  I had not heard back yet, but was planning to add that to our templates after I got your approval.  If you would like that email re-sent, please let me know.
The only rounding language that I am aware of, is in the second to last paragraph of this template.
Please let me know what changes are necessary.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shackleton, Sara
Sent:	Monday, October  22, 2001 4:59 PM
To:	Hundl, Kimberly
Subject:	RE: New Confirm Template

Kim:

A very general question:  shouldn't all of the financial power templates provide for corrections to published prices and rounding to four places for commodities quoted in MMBtus?  Your template does not contain either of these.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hundl, Kimberly
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 1:51 PM
To:	Shackleton, Sara; Hendry, Brent
Cc:	Murphy, Melissa Ann
Subject:	New Confirm Template

Per our discussion this morning I have attached the new form for our confirms.  Please let me know if further changes are necessary.
 << File: sampledoc.doc >>
Thank you for your help!
Kimberly Hundl x31647


FYR

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Pinder, Lori
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 5:25 PM
To:	Ramirez, Angie; 'Apke@alltel.net'; Barrow, Cynthia; Davis, Hardie; King Jr., Frazier; Rice, Greek; Whalley, Greg; Bouillion, James L.; Derrick Jr., James; Priddy, Janice; Burgess, Jay; 'Jmoise@alltel.net'; Lavorato, John; Swafford, John; Leo, Johnson; Knepshield, Judy; Murray, Julia; Cole, Kate; Johnson, Kelly; Eggebrecht, Kurt; Pardue, Larry; Pinder, Lori; Pham, Lynda; Martinez, Mary G.; Perkins, Mary; Moore, Jerry Thomas; Rieker, Paula; 'rkimbrell@alltel.net'; Hrna, Sandra; SAP Master Data; Hu, Sylvia; Callahan, Teresa; Trujillo, Vicsandra; LaBaume, Wanda
Subject:	Sale of Fountain Valley Power, L.L.C.

Although this entity was sold earlier this year, an announcement e-mail was not issued at that time due to lack of complete documentation.

On March 30, 2001, Fountain Valley Power, L.L.C. (87V-FVPL) sold; 100 percent of the ownership interest was assigned to Black Hills Fountain Valley, L.L.C.

Please share with interested individuals within your groups.

Corporate Records - - Evidence to be hand delivered.

Lori Pinder
Supervisor, Corporate Services
and Assistant Secretary
1400 Smith St., Room 4802
Houston, Texas 77002
713.853-7291
713.646.8007 (Fax)


pls print for me.  thanks. dF
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 03/13/2000
12:22 PM ---------------------------

Dave Waymire
03/13/2000 10:44 AM
To: Maria Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: TW Compressor Monetization

Attached is my analysis based on a sales price of $14.2MM and $14.8MM with a
buy back in the 7th year.  The loan structure for Hanover assumes that the
difference between the sales price and TW's buy back price would be amortized
over the contract term.  The remaining balance of the loan is assumed to be a
balloon payment at the end of the finance term.

I will put together some analysis on a 9 year term and forward this on to you
when it is completed.


(1)  Commonwealth Bank (in Australia)
   (2)  EPM ECHO Ltd.

Also, I need to have your respose to Statoil which I left on your voice mail.
And, further, are you looking into Deutsche Bank?

I'll be checking voice mail while I'm in San Antonio.  I gave the credit
group in Houston Thursday and Friday off.  Sara


Here are a couple of comments after my discussions with AA regarding the
Lehman Forward.

I would like a proviso in the introduction of the forward that explicitly
states that "it is the intent of the parties that this contract does not give
Party A any of the rights that rank senior to a common shareholder of ENE
Corp."  I believe this is the economic deal that Lehman is agreeing to and
would like the explicit statement to provide comfort on the accounting side.
Given that this contract is governed by a Master ISDA, are there any
circumstances that the Master ISDA would provide for cash settlement for
something that is outside the control of Enron?  AA and I are not sure of the
answer to this question and are soemwhat confused on the point of netting and
setoff procuedures under the Master ISDA.


Hello Vince,

I just wanted to confirm that I have you scheduled for a one-on-one training session on Friday, June 8th at 9:00 AM.  Please bring your laptop to EB2249B at your assigned time.

The process will take approximately an hour and we will go over making sure that your dial-up software works and that you understand the process.  If you are an EBS employee, be sure to bring your secure id token, otherwise, all you will need to bring is your laptop (we provide power supplies for Compaq and IBM laptops.)

If you need to cancel, or you are running late, please page me at 713-327-6618 and notify me.  Also, if you are 15 minutes late, you will need to reschedule.

Thanks,

Melody Gray
Ready2Go

P.S.  At this time, we are unable to help with personally-owned laptops.


Jim,

I hadn't included you on the original distribution of this message and Alan thought you should have this.  Vince Kaminsky of Enron is one of the panelists and it may be good for you or someone from our group to be sure to speak with Vince before his appearance next month at the market monitoring conference.  we should especially fill him in on the CAISOs attitude toward markets.

Thanks,

Dave

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Perrino, Dave
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 2:42 PM
To:	Comnes, Alan; Nicolay, Christi L.; Novosel, Sarah; Walton, Steve; Mara, Susan; Alvarez, Ray
Subject:	Western Market Monitoring Workshop  10-23-01

To All,

Below is the announcement of a Market Monitoring workshop to be held in San Francisco on November 16.  There is a fee to attend of $50.00.  The scope of the meeting is to discuss market monitoring in the west.  The workshop is hosted by the CAISO and co-sponsored by RTO West and WestConnect.  I am planning on attending and I'm guessing Alan and Sue will want to attend as well.  You'll see on the agenda, that the friend of the market - Anjali Sheffrin is on the first panel, so expect an action packed day!  And our own Vince Kaminsky is on panel 3 (Christi, do you know Vince and should we check with him on any positions we have?).

Kind Regards,

Dave

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Listmanager" <listmanager@dstarnet.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 8:39 AM
To:	dstarwdoc@dstarnet.com
Subject:	DSTAR Documents:  Western Market Monitoring Workshop  10-23-01

Subscription Option #1 -- Document Distribution Mailing List

APPENDICES DOCUMENTS:

WESTERN MARKET MONITORING WORKSHOP
Attached is an invitation and draft agenda for a Market Monitoring workshop
to be held on November 16, 2001 and brought to you, in part, by WestConnect.
This is your opportunity to be involved in discussions relating to market
monitoring in the West.

NOTE:  If you have difficulty opening the attached documents from this
e-mail, save them to your hard drive first and then open them from Word.

QUESTIONS?
...About a document?  Please send and email to:
docadministrator@dstarnet.com <mailto:docadministrator@dstarnet.com>
<<mailto:docadministrator@dstarnet.com>>.
...About your subscription to this mailing list?  Please email:
listmanager@dstarnet.com <mailto:listmanager@dstarnet.com>
<<mailto:listmanager@dstarnet.com>>.

WANT TO UNSUBSCRIBE?
Please send a blank email to:  dstarwdoc-request@dstarnet.com
<mailto:dstarwdoc-request@dstarnet.com> and type the word "Unsubscribe"
into the subject line.

Thank you.

<http://www.dstarnet.com>

 - Invitation to 11-16-01 Market Monitoring Workshop 10-23-01.doc
 - Agenda for 11-16-01 Market Monitoring Workshop 10-23-01.doc


comed sucks!

713-853-6203


-----Original Message-----
From: LIL_REG1@HOTMAIL.COM [mailto:LIL_REG1@HOTMAIL.COM]
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 9:56 AM
To: Davis, Dana
Subject: Highly Recommended by REGINALD SHANKS

Hi,

REGINALD SHANKS would like you to see this Web page:

A Dance For You
(By Flowgo)

Click below to see this page and to join the Flowgo mailing list:
http://www.flowgo.com/rsubf.cfm?id=adzpxDygoqjStzecyPlgt&l=79&p=8846&d=08-14-01

To just visit the recommended page, click here:
http://www.flowgo.com/refer/redir.cfm?page_id=8846&d=08-14-01

We also thought you might be interested in the following SPECIAL offer!

Have you lost touch with old friends?  Then check out classmates.com!  Come to Classmates.com to search through their 20 million users for people from your past!
http://www.flowgo.com/adredir.cfm?ad_id=528&d=08-14-01
AOL LINK

================================================

The flowgo.com mail referral system is meant to be used exclusively as a way to forward preferred pages to friends.

One of your friends sent this email through our website.
Friend's name: REGINALD SHANKS
Friend's IP address: 172.16.1.251
Date and Time: 8/14/01 8:03:44 AM Pacific

If you feel this email was sent to you in error, or you do not know the friend you are receiving emails from, please notify us at:

abuse@flowgo.com

If you wish to never receive a referral from a friend, click the link below.

http://www.flowgo.com/nonrecip.cfm?id=adzpxDygoqjStzecyPlgt


Amerex

Sean Crandall:
deal 537943
Amerex shows term as 3/8-3/31......enpower has 3/7-3/31

Prebon
All deals checked out fine.

Bloomberg
All deals checked out fine.


The EES VaR for today is $16.9 million, up from $15.6 million, due primarily
to additional short positions added to the Power West portfolio.  The short
positions associated with the Univerisity of California facilities are
expected to be removed early this week, which should decrease VaR.


The water could be 100 feet or more away from the dock, depending on how long
it blows that hard.   I hope our shrimp come back.

"Neil Mann" <nmann@erac.com> on 10/04/2000 04:22:32 PM
Please respond to <nmann@erac.com>
To: <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: RE: St. Francis

Both!
I agree that having Matt come to our house the first time is best.
I had already looked at the weather. North winds to 25 mph. How much water
would be left in the bay?
Connecticut's new. You haven't been there with Enron have you? Better take a
coat!! Saturday the 14th is my Saturday to work. I can bring Michael with me
if necessary. No big deal.

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2000 3:35 PM
To: nmann@erac.com
Subject: RE: St. Francis

I don't know if it is meant to make us feel better, or it just IS better.

I thought maybe Matt could come visit one of these off days.  Michael would
probably be more comfortable in his own home.  I checked the weather, and
it looks like we picked the right weekend to go to Palacios last weekend.

I'm still looking good for Monday at home.  I'll probably leave Wednesday
night to go to Connecticut, back on Friday.  It looks to me like next week
is my best travel week.

Kay

"Neil Mann" <nmann@erac.com> on 10/04/2000 03:38:37 PM

Please respond to <nmann@erac.com>

To:   <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject:  RE: St. Francis

You were right, it does warm my heart. Thanks for sharing.
It certainly appears God is trying to show us we made the right decision,
don't you think.

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2000 3:09 PM
To: NikMat53@aol.com
Subject: Re: St. Francis

Please tell Matt that I will talk to Michael, and I know that he will be
glad to come over soon.

As you anticipated, he is still adjusting, so he isn't fully relaxed yet,
but knowing Michael, he will settle down soon.  Are you going to be around
for the long weekend?  Maybe Matt could come over for a visit, letting
Michael build a little confidence in a familiar environment.

Kay

NikMat53@aol.com on 10/04/2000 03:00:27 PM

To:   Kay.Mann@enron.com
cc:

Subject:  Re: St. Francis

Dear Kay,

Glad to hear Michael has settled in already.  We seem to have a great class

and Mrs. Norris is a wonderful teacher!  Please call at any time if you
have
any questions  that I can help answer or point you in the direction of
trying
to get them answered.

We would love to have Michael over one day after school.  Matt has told me
they have been playing together and he wanted to know if he could come
over.
I told him I would talk with you and see if we could set something up.
Please call if you think Michael would like to come play and we can work
something out. (If Michael needs to settle in a while, I certainly
understand.) Our # is 713.984.0126.  Hope to hear from you soon!


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Cantrell, Rebecca W.
Sent:	Wednesday, August 15, 2001 3:48 PM
To:	Allen, Phillip K.; Alvarez, Ray; Black, Don; Comnes, Alan; Courtney, Mark; Dasovich, Jeff; Ermis, Frank; Frank, Robert; Fulton, Donna; Gahn, Scott; Grigsby, Mike; Hewitt, Jess; Holst, Keith; Kaufman, Paul; Kingerski, Harry; Lawner, Leslie; Mara, Susan; Miller, Stephanie; Nicolay, Christi L.; Perrino, Dave; Ponce, Roger; Sharp, Greg; Shireman, Kristann; Smith, Matt; Steffes, James D.; Stoness, Scott; Tholt, Jane M.; Thome, Jennifer; Tycholiz, Barry; Walton, Steve
Subject:	Breaking News : PG&E Suspends Open Season for 1.2 Bcf/d of Pipe Capacity

NGI's Daily Gas Price Index
Breaking News : posted Aug 15, 11:27 AM
PG&E Suspends Open Season for 1.2 Bcf/d of Pipe Capacity
Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E) has announced that it has suspended its open season for additional intrastate pipeline capacity that was scheduled to close Aug. 30. The California utility said it made the decision not to go forward with the open season at this time while conducting a corporate wide review related to its ongoing bankruptcy proceedings.
PG&E emphasized that the open season was being deferred, not canceled, and that shippers would have a minimum of 30 days to prepare bids for service when it resumed.
"I don't want to say that we were premature in beginning the open season," said PG&E spokeswoman Christy Dennis, who noted that the company simply "has pulled back for the moment" due to the "huge reorganization process" related to the company's Chapter 11 bankruptcy. Shippers shouldn't view this as a "huge red flag" on the project.
Dennis could not cite a specific date when the open season would resume, but she said "it should be reinstituted within the next few months." Shippers will be notified then, she noted.
The utility first announced the open season in late May, saying that it planned to offer more than 1.2 Bcf/d of backbone capacity on the Redwood, Baja and Silverado paths on which gas from Malin, OR; Topock, AZ, and California in-state gas production is delivered to PG&E's local transmission system and other pipelines. Included in the open season was an anticipated 200 MMcf/d expansion of the Redwood path from Malin.
The open season initially was to have closed on July 31, but PG&E extended it until Aug. 30. The utility, which currently transports more than 3 Bcf/d of gas in central and northern California, projected that the additional in-state pipeline capacity would be in service by Jan. 1, 2003, but the open season suspension could very well push back the date.