Becky,  I attended the Thursday session.  Please send me the paperwork I need to get the CLE credits.  Thanks.

----- Forwarded by Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT on 05/30/2001 06:38 PM -----

	Sara Davidson/ENRON@enronXgate 05/30/2001 04:03 PM 	   To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michelle Blaine/ENRON@enronXgate, sandi.braband@enron.com@SMTP@enronXgate, Gail Brownfeld/ENRON@enronXgate, Robert Bruce/NA/Enron@Enron, Teresa G Bushman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nancy Corbet/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, ncrady@enron.com@SMTP@enronXgate, Eddy Daniels/NA/Enron@Enron, Angela Davis/NA/Enron@Enron, peter.del.vecchio@enron.com@SMTP@enronXgate, Andrew Edison/NA/Enron@Enron, Roseann Engeldorf/ENRON@enronXgate, Shawna Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert H George/NA/Enron@Enron, Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barbara N Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Greenberg/NA/Enron@ENRON, Wayne Gresham/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent Hendry/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen E Jones/ENRON@enronXgate, Anne C Koehler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matthias Lee/SIN/ECT@ECT, Dan Lyons/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Travis McCullough/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Mellencamp/HOU/ECT@ECT, jhmoore@enron.com@SMTP@enronXgate, Julia Murray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cheryl Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron, Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT, Limor Nissan/ENRON@enronXgate, fleite@enron.com@SMTP@enronXgate, David Portz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dale Rasmussen/ENRON@enronXgate, Coralina Rivera/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Michael A Robison/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daniel R Rogers/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank Sayre/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Lance Schuler-Legal/ENRON@enronXgate, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carlos Sole/NA/Enron@Enron, carol.st.clair@enron.com@SMTP@enronXgate, lstoler@enron.com@SMTP@enronXgate, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peter Traung/Enron@EUEnronXGate, steve.van.hooser@enron.com@SMTP@enronXgate, John Viverito/Corp/Enron@Enron, ann.elizabeth.white@enron.com@SMTP@enronXgate, Christian Yoder/ENRON@enronXgate, Stuart Zisman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cutty Cunningham/ENRON@enronXgate, Susan Bulgawicz/ENRON@enronXgate, elabano@enron.com@SMTP@enronXgate, Sami Arap/SA/Enron@Enron, Karla Azevedo/SA/Enron@Enron, Andrea Calo/SA/Enron@Enron, Vicky Martinez/SA/Enron@Enron, John Novak/SA/Enron@Enron, Celina Ozorio/SA/Enron@Enron, Cecilia Porras/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Paula Porto/SA/Enron@Enron, Fabian Valle/SA/Enron@Enron, Alison Moss/ETOL/EU/Enron@ENRON, David K Bargainer/ENRON@enronXgate, Philip Crowley/ENRON@enronXgate, ddornan@enron.com@SMTP@enronXgate, Drew Fossum/ENRON@enronXgate, lhuber@enron.com@SMTP@enronXgate, Frazier King/ENRON@enronXgate, Candace Kyle/ENRON@enronXgate, michael.moran@enron.com@SMTP@enronXgate, mpavlou@enron.com@SMTP@enronXgate, Tony Pryor/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Colleen Raker/ENRON@enronXgate, Louis Soldano/ENRON@enronXgate, jtalcott@enron.com@SMTP@enronXgate, Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Newell/EWC/Enron@ENRON, david_lawler@eott.com@SMTP@enronXgate, molly_sample@eott.com@SMTP@enronXgate, annette.vogel@eott.com@SMTP@enronXgate, john_zimmerman@eott.com@SMTP@enronXgate, Staci Holtzman/ENRON@enronXgate, dmccopp@enron.com@SMTP@enronXgate, david.hattery@nepco.com@SMTP@enronXgate, Lund@/O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=DLUND@EX@enronXgate, Shonnie Daniel/ENRON@enronXgate, sweller@enron.com@SMTP@enronXgate, Marcia Anderson/ENRON@enronXgate, Tom Lehan/ENRON@enronXgate, Janet Place/ENRON@enronXgate, al_alexanderson@pgn.com@SMTP@enronXgate, cheryl_chevis@pgn.com@SMTP@enronXgate  cc:   Subject: Law Conference -- CLE & CPE Credit

We have received inquiries from several attorneys who attended only the Thursday session of the Enron Corp. Law Conference in San Antonio.  If you have not already contacted someone about CLE credit for Thursday,  please send an e-mail to Becky Zikes stating that you attended the Thursday session.  This will enable you to claim 3.50 hours total credit, with 1.25 hours ethics credit for Thursday.  If you have any questions, please contact Becky Zikes at 3-1843, or Diane Goode at 5-7103.   Please respond by Thursday, May 31 since we need to finalize our CLE filings with the various state bar organizations.

If you wish to receive CPE credit (for certified public accountants) for the Law Conference, please  send an e-mail to Becky Zikes and we will get the appropriate certificate prepared.  Again, any questions should be directed to Becky Zikes at 3-1843, or Diane Goode at 5-7103.

Thanks for your help.


As we discussed in our meeting last week, I will be initiating a project to
capture all of our confirmations in an "inventory format" as you mentioned.
Our
log captures the major elements of each deal to keep our group organized with
regard to deadlines, etc.

When you have a minute, please elaborate on some of the specifics which
you would like to see. I have an idea, but wanted to receive your input as
well.

Thanks David


I know I'm repeating myself...thank you, thank you, thank you....


Everyone,

Due to people's vacation plans during this holiday, we are going to have a cake for Alice instead of trying to coordinate a luncheon.  It will be a "special" cake served next Wednesday morning at 10:00 am in Alice's area.  Please join us to wish Alice well.

Thanks,
Genia


no she isnt going til the 17th

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Tuesday, November 20, 2001 12:59 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

you are such a baby.  i can't go.  didn't your dad also teach you that you can't always get your way.  and you can't be mad at me.  it's not my fault.  aren't you going to see sarah anyway?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Tuesday, November 20, 2001 12:58 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

forget it

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Tuesday, November 20, 2001 12:58 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

please what?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Tuesday, November 20, 2001 12:57 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

yep, please

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Tuesday, November 20, 2001 12:56 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

you get silly.  i get dummy.  i can't go you goofball!  are you really going?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Tuesday, November 20, 2001 12:55 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

no dummy its next week, maybe we can see the tree in rockefeller center, im really psyched

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Tuesday, November 20, 2001 12:54 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

you are so funny!  i cna't go thursday because i have to be here to eat turkey and i have to be in dallas on saturday night to go out for my birthday.  sorry.  maybe next time.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Tuesday, November 20, 2001 12:53 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

no thanks but i did book our tickets to ny, we leave on thur night and come back sunday, happy packing


The report named: West VaR <http://trv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=36&report_name=West+VaR&category_cd=2&category_name=WEST&toc_hide=1&sTV1=2&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=11/15/2001>, published as of 11/15/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


for Day 1 of EEI's four workshops on Electricity Markets, How Do They Work?

Can you afford to miss the best opportunity to learn How Electricity Markets
Work from the best experts at simplifying complex issues?  Dr. Paul Joskow,
Director of  MIT's Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research and
Dr. James Bushnell of the University of California, Berkeley's, Energy
Institute will instruct the first workshop on April 26.  Register now and
attend in person or via webcast.

To find out more about the workshops, click on
http://www.eei.org/resources/meetings/policymakers_basics.pdf
Judy Mastin can field any questions at jmastin@eei.org.  You can also fax
your registration to Judy at 202/508-5445.

Highlights of the Agenda are:
10:15 am Session 1: Paul Joskow, An Overview Of Electricity Restructuring1
 1:45 am Session 2: Paul Joskow, Special Attributes of Electricity
1:30 pm Session 3: Paul Joskow and James Bushnell, Competitive Market Pricing
of Non-storable Commodities
2:45 pm Session 4: James Bushnell, Market Power
4:00 pm Session 5: James Bushnell, Auctions and Bidding
5:00 pm Session 6: Paul Joskow, Investment in Generation and Transmission
Capacity: Basic Issues

A detailed agenda can be found on the website.  It is also attached as a pdf
file

 - Agenda Day 1.pdf.doc


Looks good, Stacy.  Thanks for your help.

Susan


A typical utility luncheon.
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/HOU/EES on 12/09/99 05:40
PM ---------------------------

	Enron Energy Services

	From:  Michael Harris                           12/09/99 05:03 PM
	Phone No: 713-345-7557

To: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: How about lunch?

 - Lunch(1).jpg


Sara and Sam
Forwarding to you.  We will not be giving up clearing to another clearing
agent.  We will be clearing this activity through CSFB.
sheila
---------------------- Forwarded by Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT on 07/31/2000 12:43
PM ---------------------------

"DiSpigno, Joanne" <joanne.dispigno@csfb.com> on 07/31/2000 12:45:18 PM
To: "'sheila.glover@enron.com'" <sheila.glover@enron.com>
cc: "Goss, Kathleen" <kathleen.goss@csfb.com>, "Chiodi, Maria"
<maria.chiodi@csfb.com>
Subject: Give Up Documentation

 <<003677489.DOC>>
Per the request of Kate Goss, attached please find documents for give up
agreements.

If you have any questions, please call Kate Goss at 212 325-2228.

This message is for the named person's use only.  It may contain
confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information.  No
confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.
If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all
copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the
sender.  You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute,
print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended
recipient. CREDIT SUISSE GROUP and each of its subsidiaries each reserve
the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks.  Any
views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except
where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state
them to be the views of any such entity.
Unless otherwise stated, any pricing information given in this message is
indicative only, is subject to change and does not constitute an offer to
deal at any price quoted.
Any reference to the terms of executed transactions should be treated as
preliminary only and subject to our formal written confirmation.

 - 003677489.DOC


I thought it might behoove you guys to know about this, even though I am
unclear as to its meaning myself. Basically, Cara made a change in scheduling
that she did not change in Enpower, and it has to do with an ongoing deal
being managed by the short and long term northwest desks.

In addition, Carla and I zeroed out a deal for Diana Scholtes in scheduling -
473338 - selling to Modesto at NP-15 for BOM on peak. For some reason, she
just needed it zeroed out for tomorrow, so we did not change the deal in deal
entry. If you have any questions, please let me know.

Thanks,
Kate
819-2181
---------------------- Forwarded by Kate Symes/PDX/ECT on 12/12/2000 05:46 PM
---------------------------

Cara Semperger
12/12/2000 03:45 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Diana Scholtes/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Smurfit Deals

I show now two Smurfit Deals,

403522 for 25 flat, at 54.65,    and 246859.1 for 15  hlh, AND 25 hlh,   and
246859 for 15 llh AND 25 llh.

I have zeroed out the 25's from 246859 in Scheduling, and we are flat now.  I
did not change it in the deal because we were calcing, and I want to check
with Diana first before doing it.

What I show in Scheduling is a sale to Smurfit for 40 mw flat, which is what
is actually scheduled


Start Date: 4/29/01; HourAhead hour: 20;  HourAhead schedule download failed.
Manual intervention required.


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 11/21/2000
09:27 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Corporate Benefits @ ENRON                           11/15/2000 09:09
PM

Sent by: Enron Announcements@ENRON
To: All Enron Employees United States
cc:
Subject: Open Enrollment 2001 Deadline Extension

OPEN ENROLLMENT 2001 DEADLINE EXTENDED

Due to a very heavy, last minute influx of employees trying to make elections
and/or changes to their 2001 benefits, the open enrollment 2001 deadline has
been extended until 5pm Central Time on Friday, November 17th.

Please continue to access the web at www.enron.benefitsnow.com or the IVR at
1-800-425-5864.

You must have your 2001 open enrollment personal worksheet that contains your
personal identification number (PIN - located in the upper right hand corner
of your worksheet) in order to access the web or IVR.


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	Michelle Cormier/PRC

Date:		1/26/2001
Time:		1:00 PM - 1:30 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


Please deliver my copies to the office.

	Enron Capital Management

	From:  Doug McDowell                           10/22/99 04:52 PM

Sent by: Dolores Escamilla
To: AnnMarie Tiller/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bob Butts/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Stanley
Farmer/AA/Corp/Enron@Enron, Herman Manis/AA/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mark
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rex Rogers/Corp/Enron@Enron, Clement
Abrams/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Brent Vasconcellos/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark E
Lindsey/GPGFIN/Enron@Enron, james.reilly@citicorp.com
cc:
Subject: Delivery of Yosemite Documents

Please advise where you would like to have these documents sent to your
office of your home address.  Please e-mail me with your address so that I
can have them delivered Sunday.

Thank you,

Dolores
x3-0515


In order to bring better legal coordination and standardization to Enron's Risk Assessment and Control (RAC) group, we have formed a new legal group, which will initially include Lisa Mellencamp (Finance), Marcus Nettelton (Power Trading), Carol St. Clair (Broadband/Power Trading), Mary Cook (Financial Swaps), Peter Keohane (Canada), Ed Essandoh (Retail), Paul Darmitzel (Retail) and Elizabeth Sager (Power Trading) (Team Leader).  This group will focus on, among other things, managing Enron's exposures with bankrupt counterparties, working out credit solutions with distressed counterparties and standardizing our overall credit practices.  The initial members in this group have been drawn from Enron's numerous legal groups in order to gain a broader perspective.   Each of these members will provide support to this new group in addition to their current responsibilities.

	Within RAC, Michael Tribolet will focus on distressed counterparties, in conjunction with Bill Bradford, who continues to manage the Credit Risk Management group.

	Please join us in supporting the efforts of this new group.


John, what do you want to do with this?  We had discussed but I wanted to
follow up.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 01/29/2001
02:03 PM ---------------------------

Eric Thode@ENRON
01/22/2001 01:42 PM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Dorie Hitchcock/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Spring Business Meeting

Dave --

Sorry for the delay in responding.  Dorie has been out after surgery and I
wanted to talk with her first.  Attendance is an issue that can be addressed
via a few initiatives, including:

1) better up-front communication from the Office of the Chair through the
direct supervisors (like we did for United Way last year)
2) entertainment/big-name draw added to the line-up
3) IP-TV as a back-up for those who cannot attend
4) select a better time than last year's meeting (i.e., morning meetings have
been better attended in the past vs. last year's afternoon meeting)

There are no doubt other small changes we can make to enhance attendance, but
this should get us headed in the right direction.  Dorie and I would be happy
to sit down and discuss this with you.

Regardless of what we do to increase attendance, if we wish to do such a
meeting, we need to pick a date and get on the Hyatt calendar soon.  Their
calendar is filling up quickly.  Thanks.

Eric

David W Delainey@ECT
01/16/2001 10:18 AM
To: Mark Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron, John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Eric Thode/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Dorie Hitchcock/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Spring Business Meeting

Guys, given all the change and our 2000 success, I would argue that we should
have a meeting; however, the challenge is getting people to show up - any
thoughts on this Eric/Dorie?

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 01/16/2001
10:21 AM ---------------------------

Eric Thode@ENRON
01/10/2001 01:50 PM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Dorie Hitchcock/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Spring Business Meeting

Dave and John --

In the past, ENA has held an all-employee business meeting over at the Hyatt
in April or May.  Do you plan to hold such a meeting?  If so, we need to get
started on planning the event.  Dorie Hitchcock has typically handled the
arrangements.  Please advise.

Eric


Subject: On the first day!
>
> On the first day God created the cow.
>
> God said, "You must go to the field with the farmer all day long and
> suffer
> under the sun, have calves and give milk to support the farmer I will
> give
> you a life span of sixty years."
>
> The cow said, "That's a kind of a tough life you want me to live for
> sixty
> years. Let me have twenty years and I'll give back the other forty."
>
> And God agreed.
>
> On the second day, God created the dog.
>
> God said, "Sit all day by the door of your house and bark at anyone who
> comes in or walks past. I will give you a life span of twenty years."
>
> The dog said, "That's too long to be barking. Give me ten years and I'll
> give back the other ten."
>
> So God agreed (sigh).
>
> On the third day God created the monkey.
>
> God said, "Entertain people, do monkey tricks, make them laugh. I'll give
> you a twenty year life span."
>
> Monkey said, "How boring, monkey tricks for twenty years?  I don't think
> so.
> Dog gave you back ten, so that's what I'll do too, okay?"
>
> And God agreed again.
>
> On the fourth day God created man.
>
> God said, "Eat, sleep, play, have sex, enjoy. Do nothing, just enjoy,
> enjoy.
> I'll give you twenty years."
>
> Man said, "What? Only twenty years? No way man. Tell you what, I'll take
> my
> twenty, and the forty cow gave back, and the ten dog gave back and the
> ten
> monkey gave back. That makes eighty, okay?"
>
> "Okay," said God. "You've got a deal."
>
> So that is why for the first twenty years we eat, sleep, play, have sex,
> enjoy, and do nothing; for the next forty years we slave in the sun to
> support our family; for the next ten years we do monkey tricks to
> entertain
> our grandchildren; and for the last ten years we sit in front of the
> house and bark at everybody.
>


Colleagues:

The first draft of the accomplishments for GA has been discussed with Rick
and Jim this morning.   Although most of the inputs were there, some
important ones were still missing.

The second draft is planned for Friday June 1st, and the final for June 8th.
The week difference between 1st, and 8th will be spent entirely on
addressing the appropriate methodologies to arrive at the dollar value for
your work/accomplishment.  I promise that you--each for her/his
accomplishments --shall be personally involved in determining the appropriate
methodology so that to reflect your work in the most accurate manner.
Accordingly, I would appreciate very much that all your accomplishments
should reach me as soon as possible so that to allocate as much time for
methodology and communication with you.  A report is currently being prepared
of the compiled methodologies submitted so far and I shall send it you with
the hope that it will be of help.

I also want to communicate that the process of sending your accomplishments
is not really voluntary;  it is PRC related.  Therefore, I am really seeking
your help and support to complete this task.

Of course, please let me know if you have any question or I can be of any
help.

Brgrds

----- Forwarded by Amr Ibrahim/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 05/25/2001 02:10 PM -----

	Marcia A Linton@ENRON
	05/10/2001 08:16 AM

		 To: Amr Ibrahim/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc:
		 Subject: GA accomplishments for the period November 2000 - April 2001

---------------------- Forwarded by Marcia A Linton/NA/Enron on 05/10/2001
08:16 AM ---------------------------
From: Amr Ibrahim@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 05/09/2001 02:11 PM
To: Paul Kaufman/Enron@EnronXGate, Janine Migden/NA/Enron@Enron, Steve
Montovano/NA/Enron@Enron, Alan Comnes/Enron@EnronXGate, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Lysa Akin/Enron@EnronXGate, Roy Boston/HOU/EES@EES,
Barbara A Hueter/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan M Landwehr/NA/Enron@Enron, Donald
Lassere/NA/Enron@Enron, Bill Moore/NA/Enron@Enron, Kerry
Stroup/NA/Enron@Enron, Daniel Allegretti/NA/Enron@Enron, Tom
Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Howard Fromer/NA/Enron@Enron, Tom
Hoatson/NA/Enron@Enron, Frank Rishe/NA/Enron@Enron, Marchris
Robinson/NA/Enron@Enron, Dan Staines/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kathleen
Sullivan/NA/Enron@ENRON, Chauncey Hood/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: GA accomplishments for the period November 2000 - April 2001

Colleagues:

I am seeking your help to compile the accomplishment for GA during the period
Nov 2000 - April 2001.  Of course, these accomplishments are the summation of
your efforts either individually or through your group, and the total shall
indicate the contribution of GA to the corporate objectives of Enron.  The
aggregation of your inputs shall be one of the primary sources that Rick and
Steve will use in communicating GA impact to all stakeholders in the
company.

I would like to suggest to use the attached excel file to document your
accomplishment for the period.  I hope that it shall assist you to identify
your contribution, your estimate of value, and a line, or two, explaining the
methodology you used to arrive at your value.

I hope to receive your inputs by  May 16th (next Wednesday), so that I can
compile the inputs and issue the first draft for discussion by Monday 21st.

Of course, please let me know if you have any question.

Brgrds

AI


Lets talk today, susan.  I need to satisfy myself that this is really one of
those "shit happens" situations like everyone seems to believe, rather than a
situation where we may have a cause of action and some $$$ owed to us by
someone.  DF
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 12/01/2000
08:25 AM ---------------------------

Keith Petersen
12/01/2000 08:08 AM
To: Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Gallup

The note below was a portion of Terry Galassini's Weekly Report.  I wasn't
sure if either of you have been a part of the test information.

**Gallup Compressor Station & Mainline Expansion
A field test was completed and initial results indicate a compressor
efficiency around 80 - 82% which is within Cooper's guarantee.  A not to
exceed cost of $3 Million was provided to Marketing for station modifications
to facilitate an incremental mainline (West of Thoreau) firm capacity of 10
MMcf/d.    Additional work by E&C to fine tune the not to exceed estimate is
targeted for completion by December 8th.  The mainline expansion potential is
directly related to Gallup since the discharge pressure must be increased to
970 psig to achieve an additional 10 MMcf/d on the mainline.  The San Juan
Lateral firm capacity would remain at 850 MMcf/d.


Not clear if you all received this directly.
Received: from bpmcweb.bracepatt.com (mcafee.bracepatt.com [172.16.1.17]) by
bracepatt.com; Tue, 25 Jul 2000 15:59:37 -0500
Received: FROM eagle-qfe0.va.dominionnet.com BY bpmcweb.bracepatt.com ; Tue
Jul 25 16:04:43 2000
X-Proxy: keymaster.bracepatt.com protected
Received: from smtphost.vapower.com by eagle-qfe0.va.dominionnet.com
via smtpd (for mail.bracepatt.com [205.138.132.1]) with SMTP; 25 Jul 2000
20:56:03 UT
Received: from smtpmta.vapower.com (mta01.vancpower.com [10.101.0.157]) by
sendmail01.vapower.com (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with SMTP id QAA05905 for
<Nwodka@bracepatt.com>; Tue, 25 Jul 2000 16:56:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by smtpmta.vapower.com(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.5  (863.2 5-20-1999))
id 85256927.00725F5C ; Tue, 25 Jul 2000 16:49:15 -0400
X-Lotus-FromDomain: VANCPOWER
From: John_Mable@dom.com
To: Nwodka@bracepatt.com
Message-ID: <85256927.00725E00.00@smtpmta.vapower.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2000 16:55:46 -0400
Subject: Enron Edgecombe CT
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/mixed;
Boundary="0__=JUGoDwbyivDkOaJDcvs4VUaxc6HxtoxUjvY5VyUFFjLTCbMRf1XDKbiW"
Content-Disposition: inline

Nancy,

Attached is a document in draft form addressing some of the issues discuss in
our recent meeting.

(See attached file: Draft contract changes july24.doc)

 - Draft contract changes july24.doc


Al:

Per my voice mail, I have left a message for Mark to give his input.

I think you should revise the letter as follows, subject to Mark's edits:

"Please be advised that effective July 17, 2000, MGplc was aquired by the
Enron group. MG London Inc was part of the MGplc group.

Effective October 9, 2000, MG London Inc. changed its name to "Enron Trading
Services Inc".

Also, please be advised that the Financial Status of MG London Inc (now Enron
Trading Services Inc.) has not changed.

If there are any questions please call me at 212 715 5845."

	Alfred Pennisi@MGUSA
	10/17/2000 09:01 AM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Notification to NYMEX/CFTC

I NEED TO SEND OUT TODAY. PLEASE GIVE ME THE OK.

tks,

Alfred Pennisi
Enron Trading Services Inc
520 Madison Avenue
28th Floor
New York, NY 10022
Tel: 212.715.5845
E-mail: alfred.pennisi@enron.com

----- Forwarded by Alfred Pennisi/NYC/MGUSA on 10/17/2000 10:13 AM -----

	Alfred Pennisi
	10/10/2000 09:41 AM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 bcc:
		 Subject: Notification to NYMEX/CFTC

Mark,

I would like to send a letter to the NYMEX copy the CFTC with the following
language:

Please be advised that effective July 17, 2000 MGplc was aquired by Enron
??????. MG London Inc was part of the MGplc group.

Effective October 9, 2000 we have changed our name to "Enron Trading Services
Inc".

Also, please be advised that the Financial Status of MG London Inc has not
changed.

If there are any questions please call me at 212 715 5845.

If you would be so kind and review the above language and get back to me as
soon as possible.

Tks,

regards,

Alfred Pennisi
Enron Trading Services Inc
520 Madison Avenue
28th Floor
New York, NY 10022
Tel: 212.715.5845
E-mail: alfred.pennisi@enron.com


David, do not send out any of the information concerning the proprietary data
being collected at ENA finance or other information without first getting the
approval of Legal, Trading, and ENA Finance.  As I mentioned to you, we are
currently in process on the CFTC issues surrounding MG.  Mary

John, per my voice message, please give me a call regarding MG.  Mary

Enron North America Corp.
Mary Cook
1400 Smith, 38th Floor, Legal
Houston, Texas   77002-7361
(713) 345-7732 (phone)
(713) 646-3490 (fax)
mary.cook@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Mary Cook/HOU/ECT on 09/26/2000 11:36 AM -----

	David P Dupre
	09/26/2000 09:43 AM

		 To: Jefferson D Sorenson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 bcc:
		 Subject: MG Soliciting Substantial Documentation

To: Jeff Sorenson
           Mary Cook

I received this from Craig Young yesterday of the MG New York office who
visited us Sep. 13-15.

If you review the Word document below, he wants me to gather much information
which
we've been selective in providing to any internal or external party. As you
know, some of this information is being
provided to Sarah Wesner under the direction of John Arnold and John Lavorato.

Given the current tentative status of MG clearing trades, I am not
comfortable in providing this data at this time to MG.

However, if you think that we should be of assistance for their own analysis
to clear/ not to clear trades, please let me know.

Thanks,

David 3-3528

---------------------- Forwarded by David P Dupre/HOU/ECT on 09/26/2000 09:28
AM ---------------------------

Craig Young
09/25/2000 12:33 PM
To: david.dupre@enron.com
cc: Craig Young/NY/ECT@ECT
Subject: Soliciting Houstons Clearing

Thanks for all of your help and here is a copy of my memo and some Rolfe &
Nola
Web system

ttp://www.rolfeandnolan.com/P_ranweb.htm

http://www.rolfeandnolan.com/Press_Docs/press63.htm

Regards
Craig

---------------------- Forwarded by Craig Young/NY/ECT on 09/25/2000 12:05 PM
---------------------------

Craig Young
09/25/2000 10:47 AM
To: Michael J Hutchinson/EU/Enron@Enron
cc: Craig Young/NY/ECT@ECT
Subject: Soliciting Houstons Clearing

h


Please find attached a brief memo regarding the converstaion we had last
Friday.

 <<o1088182.doc>>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Este mensaje es confidencial. Puede contener informacion amparada
por el secreto profesional. Si usted ha recibido este e-mail por error,
por favor comuniquenoslo inmediatamente via e-mail y tenga la
amabilidad de eliminarlo de su sistema; no debera copiar el mensaje
ni divulgar su contenido a ninguna persona. Muchas gracias.

This message is confidential. It may also contain information that is
privileged or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure. If you have
received it by mistake please let us know by e-mail immediately and
delete it from your system; you should also not copy the message nor
disclose its contents to anyone. Many thanks.
?---------------------------------------------------------------------

 - o1088182.doc


No charges.  I think we should refer these to Carrie Robert and ask her to
run down the people in the organization most likely to have an interest.  In
this case, I would get in touch with Andy Fastow, Ben Glissan or someone in
the finance group in London.  That way, we can make a better determination
about the value of the relationship, make sure those who are interested in
pitching them on doing bus. with Enron can be involved. Or, we can make a
determination to decline.  I think we decide who we want to let in then do it
for free, rather than charging.

MARY CLARK @
ENRON
04/17/2001 08:58 AM

To: Elizabeth Tilney/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Cindy Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON@EES, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron@EES, Karen
Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON@EES

Subject: Re: RESPONSE NEEDED

I'm not in favor of charging a fee; that takes the goodwill out of it.   I'm
open to discussion on how often we host these meetings, however.

Elizabeth Tilney@EES
04/17/2001 08:29 AM
To: Cindy Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: RESPONSE NEEDED

I believe that Cindy and I can keep doing these and there is certainly a
"goodwill" element here...and maybe that is the way to handle it. OR we might
want to think about "formalizing" this, say once a quarter and sending out
"invitations" and, maybe, charging for this????I think there are pros and
cons on all sides of the charging issue.....maybe we should get together and
discuss? Beth
---------------------- Forwarded by Elizabeth Tilney/HOU/EES on 04/17/2001
08:24 AM ---------------------------
MARY CLARK @
ENRON
04/17/2001 08:23 AM

To: Elizabeth Tilney/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: RESPONSE NEEDED

Beth, we're a hot commodity.  See a new request below to meet with us about
innovation, culture, retaining talent.  My team will coordinate this visit if
you agree we should participate in this meeting.

Mary
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Clark/Corp/Enron on 04/17/2001 08:21
AM ---------------------------

Karen Denne
04/17/2001 07:56 AM
To: Mary Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Vance Meyer/NA/Enron@ENRON

Subject: RESPONSE NEEDED

Mary -- how do we route these requests?  It seems like Beth and Cindy have
been the point person for these visits, but I'm not sure how they'll react if
we send the requests to them.  Any ideas?  thx. kd
---------------------- Forwarded by Karen Denne/Corp/Enron on 04/17/2001
07:51 AM ---------------------------
From: Cindy Derecskey on 04/17/2001 05:18 AM
To: Vance Meyer/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: RESPONSE NEEDED

----- Forwarded by Cindy Derecskey/Corp/Enron on 04/17/2001 05:17 AM -----

	Elizabeth_Overton@haygroup.com
	04/17/2001 05:08 AM

		 To: public-relations@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Fortune Study Awards

Dear Sir/Madam,

I am trying to find a contact within your organisation who could help me set
up
a meeting between a member of your Company and members of an Irish Bank who
are
extremely interested in sending a senior level delegation on a study visit to
recognised leaders in certain fields, in particular the Innovativeness and
Getting / Keeping Talent areas of the fortune survey.

We recognise that you have won awards in these areas of the fortune survey and
would like to contact someone in this field.

I look forward to receiving your reply.

Many thanks
Elizabeth

Book now for the 2001 Hay annual conference in Florence,
http://www.icm.haygroup.com

**** This e-mail and any attachments hereto are strictly confidential and
intended solely for the addressee.  It may contain information which is
privileged.  If you are not the intended addressee, you must not disclose,
forward, copy or take any action in reliance of this e-mail or attachments.
If
you have received this e-mail in error, please delete it and notify us as soon
as possible.

The anti-virus software used by Hay is updated regularly in an effort to
minimise the possibility of viruses infecting our systems. However, you should
be aware that there is no absolute guarantee that any files attached to this
e-mail are virus free.

Hay Management Consultants, 52 Grosvenor Gardens, London SW1W 0AU, Tel (44)
(0)20 7881 7000, Fax (44) (0)20 7881 7100, http://www.haygroup.com,
http://www.haypaynet.com, http://www.haygroup.co.uk

Registered in England and Wales No. 763575

Registered office address as above  ****


Return-Path: <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
Received: from  rly-xa02.mx.aol.com (rly-xa02.mail.aol.com [172.20.105.71]) by air-xa03.mail.aol.com (v83.24) with ESMTP id MAILINXA31-1219084454; Wed, 19 Dec 2001 08:44:54 -0500
Received: from  postmaster.enron.com (outbound5.enron.com [192.152.140.9]) by rly-xa02.mx.aol.com (v83.18) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINXA28-1219084420; Wed, 19 Dec 2001 08:44:20 -0500
Received: from corp.enron.com (nahou-msmsw02p.corp.enron.com [192.168.110.109])	by postmaster.enron.com (8.10.1/8.10.1/external_corp-1.08) with ESMTP id fBJDiJ011735	for <vkaminski@aol.com>; Wed, 19 Dec 2001 07:44:19 -0600 (CST)
Received: from nahou-mscnx04p.corp.enron.com (unverified) by corp.enron.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.2.1) with SMTP id <T57ea779128c0a86e6d688@corp.enron.com> for <vkaminski@aol.com>; Wed, 19 Dec 2001 07:44:19 -0600
Received: from NAHOU-MSMBX03V.corp.enron.com ([192.168.110.41]) by nahou-mscnx04p.corp.enron.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.2966);	 Wed, 19 Dec 2001 07:44:11 -0600
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.4712.0
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed ; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C18893.3CB00697"
Subject: FW: Tim Tipton input on Seminars/Forums Sub Group
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 07:44:10 -0600
Message-ID: <31738B46B7BD864080808A19977D9F757ABF57@NAHOU-MSMBX03V.corp.enron.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: Tim Tipton input on Seminars/Forums Sub Group
Thread-Index: AcGIH5DAjuiufvQSEdWxJwBQi+MJ2QAc6NkA
From: "Kaminski, Vince J" <Vince.J.Kaminski@ENRON.com>
To: "Kaminski, Vince J" <Vince.J.Kaminski@ENRON.com>
Cc: <vkaminski@aol.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Dec 2001 13:44:11.0578 (UTC) FILETIME=[3D75B9A0:01C18893]
X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version)

>  -----Original Message-----
> From:     SloanConsulting@aol.com@ENRON
> Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 5:29 PM
> To:   vkamins@enron.com; mfkeeth@shellus.com;
> gerald.w.mcelvy@exxonmobil.com; dph@swbll.net;
> Bob.Peebler@halliburton.com; tina.sivinski@eds.com;
> bwillia6@us.ibm.com
> Cc:   pkumar@uh.edu
> Subject:  Tim Tipton input on Seminars/Forums Sub Group
>
> Forwarding to you Tim Tipton's input.
>
> Return-Path: <TNTipton@MarathonOil.com>
> Received: from  rly-xb03.mx.aol.com (rly-xb03.mail.aol.com
> [172.20.105.104]) by air-xb05.mail.aol.com (v82.22) with ESMTP id
> MAILINXB58-1218115129; Tue, 18 Dec 2001 11:51:29 -0500
> Received: from  HOURS205.mgroupnet.com (houinet3.hou.moc.com
> [192.70.218.5]) by rly-xb03.mx.aol.com (v82.22) with ESMTP id
> MAILRELAYINXB35-1218115056; Tue, 18 Dec 2001 11:50:56 -0500
> Received: from HOUEXC202.mgroupnet.com ([89.60.4.15]) by
> HOURS205.mgroupnet.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.2966);  Tue, 18
> Dec 2001 10:29:18 -0600
> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.4712.0
> content-class: urn:content-classes:message
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
> boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C187E1.213803A2"
> Subject: RE: Next Energy Committee Meeting
> Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2001 10:29:13 -0600
> Message-ID:
> <55AB91900AB222428BBCDD7E4733BD9195DA39@HOUEXC201.mgroupnet.com>
> X-MS-Has-Attach:
> X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
> Thread-Topic: Next Energy Committee Meeting
> Thread-Index: AcF/KWmG/7GFdenPRiyx09uP2hPE5AIstzFg
> From: "Tipton, T N (Tim) " <TNTipton@MarathonOil.com>
> To: <SloanConsulting@aol.com>
> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Dec 2001 16:29:18.0216 (UTC)
> FILETIME=[23DCF880:01C187E1]
> X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version)
>
> Sub-group questions appear to represent a good cross-section of issues
> which will undoubtedly spur additional comments.  (MOC feedback to
> surveys attacehd.) See you 1/23.    Tim
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: SloanConsulting@aol.com [mailto:SloanConsulting@aol.com]
> Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 8:13 AM
> To: everett.s.gibbs@us.andersen.com; vkamins@enron.com;
> mfkeeth@shellus.com; gerald.w.mcelvy@exxonmobil.com; dph@swbell.net;
> donna.p.mcginnis@dynegy.com; bob.peebler@halliburton.com;
> tina.sivinski@eds.com; bruce.sukaly@cinergy.com; Tipton, T N (Tim) ;
> bawilliamson@duke-energy.com; bwillia6@us.ibm.com
> Cc: warga@uh.edu; bobcasey@uh.edu; pkumar@uh.edu; ban_bury@swbell.net
> Subject: Next Energy Committee Meeting
>
>
> Energy Committee Members
> I wanted to fix the date on your calendar for the next Energy
> Committee
> meeting.  From the feedback received, the best date turned out to be
> January
> 23, 2001 although not everyone could make that. The 5:00 to 7:00 PM
> period
> seemed to work ok last time so we would try this again on January 23,
> 2001.
> Please mark your calendars accordingly.  We would hope to be getting
> your
> feedback soon on the specific questions sent out to each of the
> sub-groups.
> Let us know if you have not received these attachements.  Relative to
> the
> next meeting agenda, the current thought is as follows:
>                           Education sub group discussion output
>
> 30 minutes
>                           Seminars/ Forums/etc sub group discussion
> 30
> minutes
>                           Energy Trading Center sub group discussion
> 30
> minutes
>                           Marketing GEMI
>
>          30 minutes
> Would appreciate hearing your thoughts of potential additional agenda
> items,
> and any initial thoughts you might have on marketing.
> Happy Holidays,
> Lane
>  - GEMI.doc <<GEMI.doc>>

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************
 - GEMI.doc


FEATURE SELECTION:  EQUITY MARKET TRENDS by AIC Investment Advisors, Inc.
Read the complete article at
http://www.consensus-inc.com/newsletter/feature.htm
See CONSENSUS Special Discount offer on this page.
Each Tuesday the CONSENSUS Newsletter will feature a leading selection from
225 +/- weekly articles from CONSENSUS National Futures and Financial Weekly
appearing online at http://www.consensus-inc.com/  or in print.
============================================================
FREE TRIAL
A request for a FREE sample of the print and ONLINE version is available at
our website or by calling 800-383-1441 or 816-461-2800.
  Consensus - National Futures and Financial Investment Newspaper
=============================================================
TABLE OF CONTENTS:
1. Market commentary from current issue of CONSENSUS National Futures and
Financial Weekly.
2. Featured commodity of the CONSENSUS Index of Bullish Market Opinion.
3. Partial Outline of leading articles in current issue of CONSENSUS.
=============================================================
FEATURED SELECTION:
EQUITY MARKET TRENDS by AIC Investment Advisors, Inc.
(May 21, 2001) With industrial production retrenching, capital spending
dropping rapidly and layoffs by major corporations accelerating, the Fed went
to the pump once again and opened the spigot wider in the hopes of reflating
the economy as well as the stock market. Equity markets initially responded
in a lackadaisical manner (indicating that the decrease was factored into the
market) before surging higher the following day on higher volume...
Read the complete article at
http://www.consensus-inc.com/newsletter/feature.htm
=============================================================
CONSENSUS Index of Bullish Market Opinion
Contrary opinion index of market advisors
75% + overbought
25% - oversold
FEATURED MARKET: JAPANESE YEN:   14%
For more information on all of the CONSENSUS Index of Bullish Market Opinion
percentages please go to our sample online issue at
http://www.consensus-inc.com/01999si/ Consensus - National Futures and Financial Investment Newspaper
To obtain the CONSENSUS Index of Bullish Market Opinion for all 33 markets,
please call 900-328-1131 for only $2.99 per minute, updated each Tuesday by
8:00 PM Central Time.
=============================================================
To view TOTAL outline of current issue, visit our website
http://www.consensus-inc.com/  "Issue Preview"
PARTIAL OUTLINE OF FEATURED ARTICLES IN CURRENT ISSUE OF CONSENSUS FUTURES
AND FINANCIAL WEEKLY:
THE WALL STREET DIGEST by Donald H. Rowe
(June 2001) The NASDAQ is up 35% since the April 4th bottom. The
advance/decline line has been moving up relentlessly ever since the market
bottomed. The stock market has never failed to move up aggressively after a
third interest rate cut by the Fed. We have had four rate cuts and number
five is already factored into the market. Analysts say a sixth rate cut on
June 27th is possible...
DB'S NEW U.S. MONETARY & CREDIT CONDITIONS AND THE DOLLAR by Deutsche Bank AG
Foreign Exchange Research Department
(May 25, 2001) The yen gained substantial ground on both the Euro and the
dollar this past week despite widespread evidence of deteriorating Japanese
economic data. Evidence of weakening fundamentals can be found on several
fronts. For example, Japan's trade surplus narrowed a whopping 41.6% in
April, the seventh straight month of double-digit declines in the trade
surplus...
U.S. SILVER SUMMARY--2000 by Silver Users Association
(May 23, 2001) For the second consecutive year, the difference between the
high and low prices for silver (H&H NY) was less than one dollar per ounce.
The high for the year was set in February at $5.53 per ounce. The average
monthly price also reached its highest level for the year at $5.30 in that
month. For the remainder of the year there was a steady downward trend
resulting in an average of $5.00 for the year, closing the Millennium on
December 29 at $4.595 per ounce, the lowest daily price in 2000...
FARMERS CAUGHT IN ENERGY SQUEEZE by Richard A. Brock & Associates, Inc.
(May 18, 2001) The long-term energy package unveiled this week by the Bush
administration contained numerous strategies to address what the White House
calls an "energy shortage." The report from an energy task force says, "A
fundamental imbalance between supply and demand defines our nation's energy
crisis. This imbalance, if allowed to continue, will inevitably undermine our
economy, our standard of living and our national security"...
MONEY MATTERS by Peter Dag & Associates, Inc.
(May 14, 2001) Money matters. There is a strong effort on the part of many
economists to downplay the importance of monetary aggregates. Even the Fed
has convinced Congress not to hold them responsible for targeting monetary
aggregates. The reason? It is difficult to define money because of the
globalization (this is a word used to confuse people when one does not know
what is going on) of the financial markets and continued financial
innovation...
SOYBEAN COMPLEX by Salomon Smith Barney
(May 2001) We estimate the U.S. planted soybean area in 2001 at 77.0 million
acres, about 350,000 acres above the March indications. Based on normal
abandonment, we forecast the 2001 soybean harvested area to be 75.8 million
acres, 3.1 million higher than last year. Predicated on our yield estimate of
38.8 bushels per acre, we would then project the U.S. 2001 soybean crop at
2.94 billion bushels, 170 million bushels higher than last year and slightly
below the USDA's February estimate of 2.945 billion bushels...
=============================================================
This FREE weekly Newsletter publication is sent ONLY to people who have
expressed and interest in financial and investment information.
Please forward this Newsletter to your Associates/Friends.
SUBSCRIBE mail to:  editior@consensus-inc.com
UNSUBSCRIBE mail to:  editor@consensus-inc.com
=============================================================
Thank you for reading the CONSENSUS Market Advisory Newsletter. In the future
we plan to include special offers, contests and other features. The next
issue of our newsletter will be e-mailed June 6.
CONSENSUS, INC.
PO Box 411128, Kansas City, MO 64141
816-461-2800 or 800-383-1441
mail to:  editor@consensus-inc.com


The Governor's Energy Working Groups' subcommittee on merchant plants will take comments from independent suppliers on October 18th.  TVA made a presentation at the last meeting of the subcommittee.  I will forward to you an outline of their comments.

Please take a look at them and provide me with comments on how you think the industry should respond and who you think should do it (i.e. should we have EPSA testify, a panel of industry experts, etc...).  I will be on the EPSA call Friday afternoon.

For those of you who are not aware, Enron has site near Memphis that it is developing.  The air permit application was submitted prior to the Chief of Staff's letter advising local air boards to not accept new permits.  We tentatively believe that our permit can go forward w/o holdup.   While our site might be spared, we need to take into consideration the fact that the state could take action to severely limit independent power projects in TN.  This action could result in a domino effect in the south.  Also, this meeting provides us with an opportunity to bring our message regarding TVA into Tennessee.

I will also obtain a copy of the subcommittee's members and forward it to you.

Also, Robert Gowan of Stokes Bartholomew, one of our law firms in TN, is talking with the head of the EWG about getting EPSA appointed to the Advisory Board of the Working Group.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Samantha Slater" <sslater@epsa.org>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Samantha+20Slater+22+20+3Csslater+40epsa+2Eorg+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Wednesday, September 26, 2001 9:23 AM
To:	dlimbac@alleghenyenergy.com; tadlhoc@alleghenyenergy.com; zaiontj@bp.com; jconnelly@calpine.com; jflumerfelt@calpine.com; pmoeller@calpine.com; Dennis.Flaherty@Cinergy.COM; Jason.Barker@Cinergy.COM; jeffreeman@cogentrix.com; Paula_Soos@CovantaEnergy.com; carolyn_moss@dom.com; mshaywood@duke-energy.com; David.Cruthirds@dynegy.com; Jenni.Barr@ElPaso.com; Jacoby, Ben; bhueter@enron.com; Shelk, John; Beth.Bradley@mirant.com; scott.omalia@mirant.com; jane.cahill@neg.pge.com; leah.gibbons@neg.pge.com; melissa.lavinson@neg.pge.com; bryan.riley@nrgenergy.com; james.hebson@pseg.com; Kristen.Ludecke@pseg.com; ben.boyd@reliant.com; bud_albright@reliant.energy.com; chris_m_giblin@reliantenergy.com; jlsena@tecoenergy.com; jmartin@TENASKA.com; bcox@tnsk.com; achau@tractebelpowerinc.com; Dwight.Rychel@Williams.com; Gretchen.Emling@Williams.com
Cc:	Andrea Spring; Jodi Empol
Subject:	Mtg. in Nashville on October 18

The meeting with the Committee will be held in Nashville on October 18th.  Instead of 30 minutes, we will have 60 minutes.  Following our presentation, the Tennessee distributors
will have 30 minutes.  We are welcome to stay for the distributors' presentation.  The continental breakfast/registration will begin at 9:30 a.m.
 Our presentation will begin at 10:00 a.m.  The distributors will begin their
presentation at 11:00 a.m.

I hope you'll be able to join the conference call on Friday, September 28th at 11:00 a.m. EDT to discuss how to use our 60 minutes.  To access the call, please dial 1-800-937-6563 and ask for the EPSA/Samantha Slater call.  Please make sure to ask for the Samantha Slater call, since we will have two EPSA calls going on at the same time.

Thanks!


23.51

-----Original Message-----
From: Shapiro, Richard
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 8:58 AM
To: Steffes, James D.
Subject: RE: Southern Co.'s Testimony

Stock price?
--------------------------
Rick S.


Linda & Ken are beginning to make plans for the holiday and asked that I poll
each of you re the following:

Where do you plan to spend Christmas eve and Christmas day?

If planning to come to Aspen, when arriving and departing?  # in your travel
party?

If traveling commercially, please provide carrier and flight # information.

PS -- I've heard back from Liz & Jose Luis - they are arriving Aspen 12/23,
departing 12/30,
Natalie, Mark, & Zach arrive 12/26, depart 1/2.

Robyn, David, Beau - please respond ASAP.  Thanks.


NutcrackerMarket
	A Holiday Shopping Wonderland

Please join us for the 21st annual Nutcracker Market, "A World of Holiday Shopping"  by attending the Foley's Fashion Show and Holiday Brunch.

When:	Friday, November 9, 2001
Where:	Reliant Hall (formally the Astrohall)
Time:		9:00 a.m. 		priority shopping
		10:15 a.m. 	seating
		10:30 a.m. 	fashion show
		11:15 a.m.		brunch
		Noon-6:00 p.m.	shopping
Nutcracker hostesses:  Patty Lee, Beth Apke, Susan Musch, Donette Dewar

What a perfect way to start your holiday shopping, spend some time with the bosses and mingle with your co-workers. There are 36 tickets available; they will be distributed on a first-come first-served basis.   Please r.s.v.p. to Shelly Jones (shelly.jones@enron.com).

Thanks
Shelly Jones

<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>


FYI
----- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 03/02/2001 01:48 PM -----

	Tina Spiller/ENRON@enronXgate
	03/02/2001 12:58 PM

		 To: Philippe A Bibi/ENRON@enronXgate, Andy Zipper/ENRON@enronXgate, Rex
Shelby/ENRON@enronXgate, Greg Piper/ENRON@enronXgate, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Peggy McCurley/ENRON@enronXgate, Lydia Cannon/ENRON@enronXgate, Sheri L
Cromwell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Holly Keiser/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 Subject: CANCELED - Offline Update Meeting

The Offline Update meeting for Wednesday at 9:00 a.m. is canceled.  We will
assume the regular schedule the week of March 12th.

Have a great weekend,

Tina


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/16/2001
02:52 PM ---------------------------

"John D. Martin" <J_Martin@baylor.edu> on 03/06/2001 12:01:35 PM
To: Ben Esty <besty@hbs.edu>, Greg Willard <gwillard@mit.edu>,
aagrawal@cba.ua.edu, Andres Almazan <Andres.Almazan@bus.utexas.edu>,
bethel@babson.edu, Murat Binay <mbinay@mail.utexas.edu>,
abutler@finance.bus.lsu.edu, Tyrone.Callahan@bus.utexas.edu, Murray Carlson
<carlsonm@mail.utexas.edu>, chapman@eco.utexas.edu, Kent Daniel
<kent@kent.kellogg.nwu.edu>, fdiebold@mail.sas.upenn.edu, lederington@ou.edu,
Harper1@U.Washington.edu, sgillan@tiaa-cref.org, Stuart Gillan
<sgillan@tiaa-cref.org>, Denis Gromb <dgromb@mit.edu>, grullon@rice.edu,
jarradh@oregon.uoregon.edu, jhartzel@stern.nyu.edu, Jhund@mail.utexas.edu,
daveike@rice.edu, jegadees@uiuc.edu, Cindy.Justice@enron.com, Matthias Kahl
<matthias.kahl@anderson.ucla.edu>, Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com,
zkhokher@mail.utexas.edu, alynch@debit.stern.nyu.edu, Andras Marosi
<Andras.Marosi@bus.utexas.edu>, "John D. Martin" <J_Martin@baylor.edu>,
Maxwell@ba.ttu.edu, Beth Miertschin <Beth.Miertschin@enron.com>,
metrick@Wharton.upenn.edu, "Thomas H. Noe" <tnoe@mailhost.tcs.tulane.edu>,
Parrino@mail.utexas.edu, Bill Petty <Bill_Petty@baylor.edu>, manju puri
<mpuri@Stanford.EDU>, Ramnath@rice.edu, rampini@nwu.edu,
steve_rich@baylor.edu, eronn@mail.utexas.edu (Ehud I. Ronn), Kemal Saatcioglu
<KemalS@mail.utexas.edu>, Akin Sayrak <asayrak@katz.pitt.edu>,
sirri@babson.edu, Laura Starks <lstarks@mail.utexas.edu>, suarez@cemfi.es,
"A. Subrahmanyam" <asubrahm@anderson.ucla.edu>,
Stice@mailhost.tcs.tulane.edu, Titman@mail.utexas.edu,
stathis.tompaidis@bus.utexas.edu, wangfa@rice.edu, hong.yan@bus.utexas.edu,
Beth Miertschin <Beth.Miertschin@enron.com>, "Karin S. Thorburn"
<Karin.S.Thorburn@Dartmouth.EDU>
cc:
Subject: Hello all

Update:

Preparations for the upcoming Texas Finance Festival III are about complete
and I just wanted to update you on the hotel reservations information.  You
will need to make your reservation before March 20 to be assured of getting
a room in our reserved block.  Also, for "counting" purposes I need
everyone's registration form completed.  Many of you (and a lot of new
faces) have already sent them in but some may not have, so . . .

Lots of fun stuff is planned so come prepared for a very relaxing and
productive weekend!

John

 - announcerev.doc

John D. Martin
Carr P. Collins Chair in Finance
Finance Department
Baylor University
PO Box 98004
Waco, TX 76798
254-710-4473 (Office)
254-710-1092 (Fax)
J_Martin@Baylor.edu
web:    http://hsb.baylor.edu/html/martinj/home.html


Sara and Ted,
ECT Investments Inc. is establishing an Excuting Broker relationship with
Lehman Brothers.  The purpose is order flow and research which Lehman
provides to Equity Trading.
Kelly is forwarding the agreement to Samantha Boyd.
Please do not hesitate to call if questions.
Sheila


16:01:20 Synchronizing Mailbox 'Taylor, Mark E (Legal)'
16:01:20 Synchronizing Hierarchy
16:01:20 Synchronizing Favorites
16:01:20 Synchronizing Folder 'Inbox'
16:01:24 	   5 item(s) added to offline folder
16:01:24 	   1 item(s) changed read-state in offline folder
16:01:24 Synchronizing Folder 'Outbox'
16:01:24 Synchronizing Folder 'Sent Items'
16:01:24 	   2 item(s) added to offline folder
16:01:24 Synchronizing Folder 'Calendar'
16:01:25 	   1 item(s) added to offline folder
16:01:25 	   2 item(s) updated in offline folder
16:01:25 Synchronizing Folder 'Contacts'
16:01:25 Synchronizing Folder 'Drafts'
16:01:25 Synchronizing Folder 'Tasks'
16:01:25 Synchronizing Folder 'Journal'
16:01:25 Synchronizing Folder 'Notes'
16:01:26 Synchronizing Views
16:01:26 Synchronizing Forms
16:01:26 Done


Dear Tana,

This is a big company so in terms of general counter party approval they are
fine.

Jane McBride
Senior Legal Counsel
Enron Japan Corp.

Otemachi 1st Square Bldg.
West 11th Floor
1-5-1 Otemachi, Chiyoda-ku
Tokyo 100-0004
Japan

Tel.:       81-3-5219-4500 (Main)
              81-3-5219-4553 (Direct)
Fax:       81-3-5219-4510

Assistant (Maggy Yamanishi)
Tel.:        81-3-5219-4554
Email:      Yo.Yamanishi@enron.com

	Tana Jones@ECT
	10/24/2000 07:53 AM

		 To: Jane McBride/AP/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Idemitsu Kosan Co Ltd

I just got a call from the online team, and there is a rush push on from
London to get this counterparty approved ASAP.  Since you are the key person,
I thought I'd pull you into the loop.  This counterparty should be coming
thru on tomorrow's approval list.  I know you've got to do your due
diligence, so if you could let me know how long it will take to get back to
me I can let the EOL and London people know.  Much thanks!

P.S.  I enjoyed chatting with you at the seminar!
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 10/23/2000 05:49 PM -----

	Lisa Lees
	10/23/2000 05:27 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Idemitsu Kosan Co Ltd

As discussed, here is the name of the Japanese counterparty that will be on
credit's next approval matrix.

Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT on 10/23/2000 05:21 PM
---------------------------

From:  John Suttle
 10/23/2000 04:38 PM

To: Justin Timothy/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Lara Fields/LON/ECT@ECT, Anna Gardiner/LON/ECT@ECT, Neil R
Anderson/LON/ECT@ECT, Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Idemitsu Kosan Co Ltd

Given the recent confusion on this counterparty and the push to have them
approved - I will review Idemitsu today and have recommendations by late this
afternoon.

Justin Timothy@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
10/17/2000 11:40 PM
To: John Suttle@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Idemitsu Kosan Co Ltd

John

FYI

Justin
---------------------- Forwarded by Justin Timothy/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
18/10/2000 03:40 PM ---------------------------

Justin Timothy
18/10/2000 03:36 PM
To: Anna Gardiner/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Frank L Davis@ECT

Subject: Re: Idemitsu Kosan Co Ltd

Anna,

I just wanted to confirm with you that all fuel & liquids customers,
including those from Singapore, are being handled by credit in Houston now
that the responsibility for Global Products has moved from London to Houston.
I spoke with Sheri Thomas & Tom Moran (Houston credit) this morning & they
both agreed that these (Asia Pacific) counterparties should now be handled by
Houston. However there still appears to be some confusion over this issue so
I would appreciate it if you could send a reply confirming that this is the
understanding at your end so as to avoid any further confusion.

Many thanks

Justin

Anna Gardiner@ECT
10/10/2000 07:55 PM
To: Justin Timothy/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Enron London - EOL Product Control
Group/LON/ECT@ECT, Amita Gosalia/LON/ECT@ECT, Bo Petersen/LON/ECT@ECT, Lara
Fields/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Idemitsu Kosan Co Ltd

Justin

I spoke with Frank Davis in Houston yesterday about this PA and he agreed
that Houston PCG would ensure that this customer was reviewed in Houston and
set up as soon as possible.  I have also confirmed with Frank and Amita
Gosalia the situation with regards to responsibilities for Japan when
processing PAs.  Japan has always been the responsibility of the Houston PCG
except in the case of metals customers which are approved by credit and legal
in London.

It would seem that this is an issue that needs to be discussed further
between the London, Houston and Australia groups to establish responsibilites
further. Hopefully this will ensure that this type of confusion does not
occur again and delay the processing of a customer application.

Rgds

Anna

Justin Timothy@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
09/10/2000 07:27
To: Bo Petersen/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Lara Fields@ECT

Subject: Re: Idemitsu Kosan Co, Ltd

Bo,

I put Idemitsu's PA into the database  for credit review on Sept 26 & it was
picked up by John Suttle in Houston. I haven't heard anything since & seeing
as they appear to be a fuel & oils customer I have today changed the RAC to
London so that the PA can be processed over there, which is probably where it
should have gone in the first place. I apologise for the delay and
inconvenience however there was initially some confusion between myself &
Houston as to where Asia Pacific fuel & oil customers should be processed.

Regards

Justin
PCG - Sydney

Sent by: Lara Fields@ECT
To: Justin Timothy/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Bo Petersen/LON/ECT@ECT, Enron London - EOL Product Control
Group/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Idemitsu Kosan Co, Ltd

Justin,

Idemitsu Kosan in Japan sent in a PA on 29 Sept to your office.

Bo Petersen of our Global Products team has been getting calls from them
wanting to know the status of their PA as they are very anxious to get online.

The database says 'Credit Reviewing' - can you please feed back any comments
or updates to Bo and the London PCG directly?  I will be out of the office on
Monday and want to ensure that Bo knows what to tell the customer should they
call again.

Thank you,
Lara


Dale started preparing this on a weekly basis - thought you might want to
take a look at it.  It deatils what his team is working on, progress, status,
etc.

Sheri
---------------------- Forwarded by Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT on 08/25/2000 12:58
PM ---------------------------
Dale Neuner   08/24/2000 05:32 PM

To: David Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sheri Thomas, Mark Dilworth/LON/ECT@ECT,
Jason Althaus/Corp/Enron@Enron, Frank Davis, Jennifer deBoisblanc
Denny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Torrey Moorer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Work in progress update


I sent an email to Phillip as well.  We will find out.


To clear above value and additional deals added on 2/9/2001 to flatten out
the ENA-Cal book Monica entered an annuity [ENA-Cal buys from EPMI-LT-NAMGMT]
for $8731408.74, pv'd =$8,679,165.


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 10/25/2000 07:56
AM ---------------------------

Chris Germany
10/24/2000 06:10 PM
To: Jeffrey Porter/HOU/EES@EES, dscott1@columbiaenergygroup.com, Michael H
Garred/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Victoria Versen/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Nov Capacity

I checked the CGLF and CGAS capacity against Navigator.  Take a look and let
me know what you think.  Also, do you know the demand charges for the CGAS
items highlighted in purple?


Attached is EPSC Invoice.  Please review the invoice for accuracy and call me if you should have any questions or corrections at 37274.


Any conflicts?
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Detiveaux, Kim
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 2:11 PM
To:	Jones, Tana
Subject:	RE: NDA with Experian

Tana:

Legal Name and Address:

	Experian Inc.
	505 City Parkway West
	Orange, CA  92868

Contact Name:

	Sharon Granger
	sharon.granger@experian.com
	450 Gears Road,  Suite 130
	Houston, TX  77067
	281 877 1436

Nature of Discussions:

Several groups within Enron (RAC, Enron Direct North America, Enron Direct Canada,  Enron Direct U.K., Enron Credit) use credit scoring information to approve/deny credit to potential counterparties associated with deal flow.  D&B, the top source of this information in North America, only covers about 60% of the counterparties in which we have interest.  We want to bring Experian data into the credit process to get North American coverage up >90%.  It is possible that will want to use Experian to support Canada, UK, Spain and Netherlands markets as well.  As we get into discussion with Experian, we will need to reveal details about RAC, EES, EC, our systems, marketing plans, target acceptance rates, etc.  They will need to reveal limitations relating to coverage, interfaces, data structure, etc.  It is the coverage of these discussions I am seeking.

Kim Detiveaux

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Jones, Tana
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 1:23 PM
To:	Detiveaux, Kim
Subject:	FW: NDA with Experian

Re: Experian we need:

1.  Full Legal Name and Address
2.  Mark wants a more exact description of the nature of your discussions
3.  An email address so we can send it directly to counterparty

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Greenberg, Mark
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 8:14 AM
To:	Detiveaux, Kim
Cc:	Chaney, Craig; Perinne, Albane; Jones, Tana
Subject:	RE: NDA with Experian

Kim -

Please provide me with the full name and address for Experian.  Also, we can forward the agreement on your behalf if you provide us with an e-mail address and contact name.  Finally, please give me some indication of the exact nature of the discussions, if there is any need to make the NDA specific vs. general.

If you provide these items today, we should be able to get our language out later this afternoon, tomorrow moring at the latest.

Mark

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Detiveaux, Kim
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 8:10 AM
To:	Greenberg, Mark
Cc:	Chaney, Craig; Perinne, Albane
Subject:	NDA with Experian
Importance:	High

Mark:

I have started discussions with Experian, likely to result in Experian becoming Enron's #2 provider of credit scoring data.  I need to get an NDA in place with Experian ASAP to cover sensitive items likely to be covered during our negotiations.  I would like to get our NDA language to them today.  Please advise as to how to proceed...

Kim Detiveaux


Daren-

Do we have the buy/Sell deal for El Paso ( formerly Teco)  for January 01
Prod?
The old deal numbers were 235670 for the sale and 137870 for the purchase.

---------------------- Forwarded by Katherine Herrera/Corp/Enron on
02/23/2001 03:59 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Megan Parker                           02/23/2001 03:57 PM

To: Katherine Herrera/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Michael Olsen/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Meter 986884 for 1/2001

Mike: this is Katherine Herrera's.
---------------------- Forwarded by Megan Parker/Corp/Enron on 02/23/2001
03:55 PM ---------------------------

Michael Olsen
02/23/2001 03:52 PM
To: Megan Parker/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Meter 986884 for 1/2001

Megan,

I was unable to extend the deal for Teco # 137870 and #235670 becaus e it has
been suspended.  Teco is no longer the counterparty.  Has the name changed?

---------------------- Forwarded by Michael Olsen/NA/Enron on 02/23/2001
03:48 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Sherlyn Schumack @ ECT                           02/23/2001 03:26 PM

To: Michael Olsen/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Edward Terry/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Meter 986884 for 1/2001

Mike,
Have you heard anything about extending the buy/sell ticket for TECO yet?
Today is the last day we can make changes in the system.


Cheryl:

1. & 3.    You should verify wtih Cheryl Lewis whose information is in Lotus
Notes.  I do not have correct spelling of name or her fax number.

2.  Officers need to be confirmed through the Enron Corp. corporate
secretary's office.  See the separate email I just sent you.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	Cheryl Nelson@ENRON
	Sent by: Cheryl Nelson@ENRON
	04/02/2001 04:45 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Enron Credit Inc.

Sara, I have stopped by your office but you are not around.  Please provide
the following information/clarification in light of your conversations with
other folks:

1. We do not have to send Bear the Officers/Traders list and other documents
with the agreements to get things moving?

2.  If we do, then who do I contact or ask Richard Sage to contact to get
this information re: the correct slate of officers updated?  No one has
advised me of these steps.  And actually, if we have to do this, I would like
Stephanie to take the lead on finishing her work on this part of the project.

3. Re: this attorney Cheryl at Bear  that you have talked to -- what is her
full name, phone, and fax?

Thanx.

Cheryl Nelson
Senior Counsel
EB3816
(713) 345-4693


Each of you needs to send a book request for the East & West portfolios for the counterparties listed in the following spreadsheet.  The spreadsheet identifies those counterparties which we are still performing under the contracts.  Please create a East-Performance and a West-Performance book.  We then need to get all deals with the following counterparties moved to those books.  I would suggest you pull the values out of AdHoc as of 12/31 for the counterparties by desk before transferring them to the new desk.  Obviously these transactions will create prior days and the amount will run through the P&L in the old and new books and flatten out.  The remaining prior day value will need to be in Schedule E.

Stacey

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Luong, Steven
Sent:	Thursday, January 10, 2002 1:08 PM
To:	White, Stacey W.
Subject:	Customer List

Don asked me to send you this file.


Here is a brief synopsis of my view of LDC gas hedging, which I just chewed
Harry's ear off explaining:

1.  Commission needs to understand how hedging works.  In a typical market
situation, the supplier of a good negotiates with the consumer, who can
explain to the supplier what his appetite for risk and term is, and then the
supplier can come up with the appropriate pricing and term (eg. all spot,
fixed price, pricing within a band). In other words, the hedge reflects the
customer's specific wants and needs.

2.  When a utility tries to hedge for its amorphous group of bundled sales
customers, it lacks the specific knowledge of  the appetite for risk that
group has, and in fact, the appetites will be all over the place.  Therefore,
the hedging will not be perfect.  If a utility locks in some pricing at term,
there is always the risk that a hindsight regulatory review will find that
the price was too high in light of later market developments, or that too
much reliance was placed on spot, which may have moved up.  What utilities
need then, is the guidance to hedge, and then freedom from hindsight review.
(This gives ENA a good market for its hedged products and removes regulatory
risk involved with those products.)

3.  When the utility hedges, it faces potential stranded costs, which arise
if load leaves.  Thus, to mitigate the potential and size of this problem,
the hedged portfolio should only be dedicated to those customers for whom
leaving for transportation is not a real option (residential and small
commercial).  If larger customers are on sales service, their rates should
reflect market index prices, as they do have the ability to leave, and spot
pricing removes the stranded cost and undercollection concerns.  (It also
gives us something easy to market against).  In other words, we need 2 PGA's,
one for captive customers and one for non-captive customers.

4.  To make this 2-part world work, there must be in place an effective
transportation program that enables larger customers to shop for their own
supplies in the competitive market.

Sue, I will be in Houston Tues afternoon and Wed. if you want to meet to
discuss.


THE LIGHTHOUSE
"Enlightening Ideas for Public Policy..."
VOL. 2, ISSUE 40
October 17, 2000

Welcome to The Lighthouse, the e-mail newsletter of The Independent
Institute, the non-partisan, public policy research organization
<http://www.independent.org>. We provide you with updates of the
Institute's current research publications, events and media programs.

-------------------------------------------------------------

IN THIS WEEK'S ISSUE:
1. Defective Tires, Defective Bureaucracy
2. Paul Craig Roberts on the War on Crime
3. Medicare Reform: Economics versus Politics

-------------------------------------------------------------

DEFECTIVE TIRES, DEFECTIVE BUREAUCRACY

Some fans of the regulatory state believe that NHTSA, the National
Highway Traffic Safety Administration, deserves much credit -- and,
in reward, expanded powers -- for its role in exposing the Firestone
tire/ Ford Explorer fiasco. But although NHTSA received early reports
of fatalities caused by the separation of Firestone tires, its
investigation began very recently -- last May -- long after
investigations by State Farm Insurance, the Center for Auto Safety,
and Safety Forum brought the problem to light.

This isn't the first time that NHTSA has failed its mission, argues
Michael I. Krauss, law professor at George Mason University and
author of the recent Independent Institute book FIRE AND SMOKE:
Government, Lawsuits and the Rule of Law.

"NHTSA, the agency responsible for minimum fuel economy standards
(found by a court to have likely cost many lives by forcing
manufacturers to produce light, dangerous cars) and for
illegal-to-disable, baby-killing airbags, does not deserve to be
rewarded for its asleep-at-the-switch approach to the tire problem,"
Krauss wrote recently.

It would be absurd to reward Firestone for selling defective tires.
However, when NHTSA fails, self-proclaimed "consumer advocates" call
for a parallel absurdity: lavishing the agency with more regulatory
authority and taxpayer funds. But NHTSA's pattern of failure
indicates a systemic problem -- a design flaw -- that cannot be
easily repaired. In contrast, as the Firestone episode demonstrates,
the watchful eyes of the American economic and legal systems have
enormous incentives to detect and report product defects. In this
light, perhaps what most needs to be recalled and held accountable
for sloppy workmanship and false advertising is: the defective
regulatory state.

For more information, see "The Feds Eye Firestone," by Michael Krauss
(The Washington Times, 9/22/00), at
http://www.independent.org/tii/lighthouse/LHLink2-40-1.html.

For Michael Krauss's book, FIRE AND SMOKE: Government, Lawsuits and
the Rule of Law (The Independent Institute, 2000), see
http://www.independent.org/tii/lighthouse/LHLink2-40-2.html.

-------------------------------------------------------------

PAUL CRAIG ROBERTS ON THE WAR ON CRIME

Election-year promises always renew the risk that peaceful Americans
will see their rights sacrificed for the sake of political
expediency. This is especially true when politicians promise to "get
tough on crime," as syndicated columnist and Independent Institute
research fellow Paul Craig Roberts pointed out recently.

Although one "anti-crime" bill (or "anti-privacy" according to its
critics) was recently defeated, another "anti-crime" bill -- this one
strengthening asset forfeiture laws -- has just been introduced.
Unfortunately, says Roberts, asset forfeiture laws violate due
process and are any easy way for politicians to look "tough on crime"
even though such laws harm innocent Americans far more than criminals.

"The House Judiciary Committee led by Henry Hyde, R-Ill., has
documented the most extraordinary abuses of the asset forfeiture
laws," writes Roberts. "The Banking Committee and [the bill's author]
should sit down with Hyde and listen carefully before they create any
more Gestapo powers for law-enforcement officers."

For more information, see "Dangers lurk in war on crime," by Paul
Craig Roberts, at
http://www.independent.org/tii/lighthouse/LHLink2-40-3.html.

For more on civil forfeiture laws, see CIVIL FORFEITURE AS A "SIN
TAX" by Donald J. Boudreaux and Adam Pritchard, at
http://www.independent.org/tii/lighthouse/LHLink2-40-4.html.

Also see the Independent Institute book, TO SERVE AND PROTECT:
Privatization and Community in Criminal Justice, by Bruce Benson, at
http://www.independent.org/tii/lighthouse/LHLink2-40-5.html.

-------------------------------------------------------------

MEDICARE REFORM: Economics versus Politics

Debates over Medicare reform didn't start with Al Gore and George W.
Bush. In fact, legislation similar to Medicare had been intensely
debated since the mid-1940s. However, its advocates found no way to
overcome opposition until 1965, when Medicare's staunchest advocate
on the House Ways and Means Committee found the opportunity to
smuggle Medicare legislation into another bill at the last minute.

Yet as vocal as debates over Medicare have been, very little of that
debate has been informed by sound economic principles. This omission,
which has stalled any genuine reform of Medicare, is largely the
fault of economists, says economist Robert B. Helms in the new issue
of THE INDEPENDENT REVIEW.

"My criticism is not directed to the economists who have attempted
for many years to apply market principles to health-care issues, but
to the larger number of economists who have not," Helms writes.
"Moreover, my criticism pertains to the failure of economists to
teach the fundamental principles of economics to educated Americans,
rather than to the failure of 'economics.'"

To improve the quality of the debate over Medicare, Helms recommends
three measures. First, more economists must explain to policymakers
and the public that that market competition in health care, as in
other markets, would improve quality of health care. Second, they
must explain that competition would also make health care more
efficient by allocating scarce resources to higher-valued uses.
Finally, they must explain that price controls and destructive of
these desirable ends.

Without a concerted effort to impart these principles to a wider
audience, Helms argues, Medicare reform -- and other necessary
health-policy reforms -- will become victim of political maneuvering,
much to the detriment of the lives and well-being of the American
public.

"This lack of education in economics is appallingly evident in
Washington, D.C., especially on Capitol Hill," says Helms.

For more information, see "Medicare Reform: Economics versus
Politics" by Richard B. Helms (THE INDEPENDENT REVIEW, Fall 2000), at
http://www.independent.org/tii/lighthouse/LHLink2-40-6.html.

For more on Medicare, see "Medicare's Progeny: The 1996 Health Care
Legislation" by Charlotte Twight (THE INDEPENDENT REVIEW, Winter
1998), at
http://www.independent.org/tii/lighthouse/LHLink2-40-7.html.

Also see the Independent Institute book, AMERICAN HEALTH CARE:
Government, Market Processes and the Public Interest, edited by Roger
D. Feldman, at
http://www.independent.org/tii/lighthouse/LHLink2-40-8.html.

For the Independent Institute's "Guide to Resources on Price Controls
in Health Care," see
http://www.independent.org/tii/lighthouse/LHLink2-40-9.html.

-------------------------------------------------------------

If you enjoy receiving THE LIGHTHOUSE ... please help us support it.

Your supporting Independent Associate Membership enables us to reach
thousands of other people. So, please make a contribution to The
Independent Institute. See
http://www.independent.org/tii/lighthouse/LHLink2-40-10.html to
donate, or contact Ms. Priscilla Busch by phone at 510-632-1366 x105,
fax to 510-568-6040, email to <PBusch@independent.org>, or snail mail
to The Independent Institute, 100 Swan Way, Oakland, CA 94621-1428.
All contributions are tax-deductible.  Thank you!

-------------------------------------------------------------

For previous issues of THE LIGHTHOUSE, see
http://www.independent.org/tii/lighthouse/LHLink2-40-11.html.

-------------------------------------------------------------

For information on books and other publications from The Independent
Institute, see
http://www.independent.org/tii/lighthouse/LHLink2-40-12.html.

-------------------------------------------------------------

For information on The Independent Institute's upcoming Independent
Policy Forums, see
http://www.independent.org/tii/lighthouse/LHLink2-40-13.html.

-----------------------------------------------------------------

To subscribe (or unsubscribe) to The Lighthouse, please go to
http://www.independent.org/subscribe.html, choose "subscribe" (or
"unsubscribe"), enter your e-mail address and select The Lighthouse.
Or, either send an e-mail message to
independent-list-request@free-market.net with the words "unsubscribe"
in the body of the message, or e-mail independent@free-market.net and
ask to be unsubscribed.

Copyright , 2000 The Independent Institute
100 Swan Way
Oakland, CA 94621-1428
(510) 632-1366 phone
(510) 568-6040 fax
info@independent.org
http://www.independent.org


April 24, 2001
Notice No.:  01-140

To:
All NYMEX Holdings, Inc. Stockholders

From:
Donna M. Talamo, Director
Office of the Corporate Secretary

Re:
List of Candidates for Election to the Board of Directors of NYMEX
Holdings, Inc.

Please be advised that the Office of the Corporate Secretary has received
declarations which qualify the following candidates to run for election to
the Board of Directors of NYMEX Holdings, Inc.  The election will be held
on Wednesday, May 23, 2001.

EQUITY  HOLDER
(THREE vacancies)
(Terms expiring 2004, 2003 and 2002)

Cataldo Capozza
Joseph Cicchetti
Steven Crystal
Stephen Durante
Steven Errera
Joel Faber
Gary Lapayover
Stanley Levin
David Lazarus
Michel Marks
John Moore
Stephen Renov
Robert Sahn
Sol Tanne
Howard Wolfson
James Zamora

FUTURES  COMMISSION  MERCHANT
(ONE vacancy)
(Term expiring 2003)

John McNamara  (JLMC)
Stanley Meierfeld   (STAN)
Peter Meyer         (WIM)

PUBLIC
(ONE vacancy)
(Term expiring 2002)

George Burman
Melvyn Falis
Lee White

For your information, the candidates' forum will be held on Wednesday, May
9, 2001 in the Board Rooms of the Exchange.

A proxy statement(s) and proxy card(s) (formerly called ballots) in
connection with the election will be mailed to you on or about May 1, 2001.

If you have any questions regarding the aforementioned, you may contact me
at
(212) 299-2372.

Carr Futures
150 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 1500
Chicago, IL 60606  USA
Tel:  312-368-6149
Fax:  312-368-2281
soblander@carrfut.com
http://www.carrfut.com


Call me soon! 713-989-0943. I'm not a broker! Let's go hunting again, I
know the game warden is at the other end of the County that day! JC


Thanks for your help.

-Dan


-----Original Message-----
From: Sdulie12@aol.com [mailto:Sdulie12@aol.com]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 6:26 AM
To: Brown18807@aol.com; PBJ831@aol.com; cdanjan@iname.com;
dan.bump@enron.com; dbump@houston.rr.com; back2tx@msn.com;
JDULTAHOE@aol.com; KFRYE1@aol.com; kchitis@msn.com; stonte@msn.com;
koreykirchner@hotmail.com; dloflin@trigo.com; Bred1019@aol.com;
RMills4837@aol.com; lmize@houston.rr; Jcschulick@aol.com;
BRaffe2179@aol.com; MAWhitt@aol.com; Whitt, Mark
Subject: Fwd: Fw: Potentially versus Realistically

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  <mshelly@acpbs.com>
To: attorney@acpbs.com, sally shelly <shelly@pclnet.net>, Randy Walton <rbwlaw@zebra.net>, allen ritchie <aar@wrglaw.com>, Toby Brown <tdb@cbycb.com>, Tim Hathorn <TimboH432@cs.com>, Dan Loflin <dloflin@trigo.com>, David Walker <David_Walker@bmc.com>, scott duliban <sdulie12@aol.com>, Jerod Schulick <jcschulick@aol.com>, Rob Jordan (E-mail) <jordanrob@email.msn.com>, neal <neal@pclnet.net>, Johnston, Nick <Nick.Johnston@msfc.nasa.gov>, charles woodroof <cwoodroof@pclnet.net>, mike white <mike@pclnet.net>
Date: Thursday, November 29, 2001 1:56:51 GMT
Subject:

-----Original Message-----
From: GURNEY JEFFREY <jgurney@cusi.org>
To: 'Andy Stedman' <stedman@benefitwest.com>; 'Bart Richardson'
<brichson@flash.net>; 'Brian Amend' <BAmend@1stGlobal.com>; 'Cam Witt'
<go4witt@aol.com>; 'Caralee Gurney' <Caralee_A_Gurney@clarkeamerican.com>;
'Charlene Gurney' <GURN@aol.com>; 'Christa Jones' <CJones@Paymentech.com>;
'Clay Conn' <clay.conn@alconlabs.com>; 'Gerald Gurney'
<gerald_gurney@texanscu.org>; 'Mitch Shelly' <mshelly@acpbss.com>; 'Paul
Young' <wyoung1@flash.net>; 'Phil Selig' <philselig@earthlink.net>; 'Rick
Smith' <rikk12@hotmail.com>; 'Scott Lingard' <slingard50@home.com>; 'Scott
Wilson' <swilson@augustmail.com>; 'Shawn Pratt' <coachpratt@home.com>; 'Wade
Crawford' <WADE.CRAWFORD@gecapital.com>
Date: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 5:00 PM
Subject: FW: Potentially versus Realistically

>
>> >A young boy approaches his father and asks, "Dad, what is
>> >the difference between 'potentially' and 'realistically'?" The
>> >father thought for a moment, then answered, "Go ask your
>> >mother if she would sleep with Robert Redford for a million
>> >dollars. Then ask your sister if she would sleep with Brad Pitt
>> >for a million dollars, and then ask your brother if he'd sleep
>> >with Tom Cruise for a million dollars. Come back and tell me
>> >what you learned from that."
>> >
>> >So the boy went to his mother and asked, "Would you sleep
>> >with Robert Redford for a million dollars?" The mother
>> >replied,
>> >Of course I would! I wouldn't pass up an opportunity like
>> >that."
>> >
>> >The boy then went to his sister and asked, "Would you sleep
>> >with Brad Pitt for a million dollars?" The girl replied, "Oh
>> >my God! I would just love to do that! I would be nuts to pass up
>> >that opportunity!"
>> >
>> >The boy then went to his brother and asked, "Would you sleep
>> >with Tom Cruise for a million dollars?" "Of course," the
>> >brother replied. "Do you know how much a million could buy?" The
>> >boy pondered that for a few days, then went back to his dad.
>> >His father asked him, "Did you find out the difference between
>> >potentially and realistically?" The boy replied, "Yes, sir.
>> >Potentially, we're sitting on three million dollars, but
>> >realistically, we're living with two sluts and a queer."
>
>
>


New matter

	"Barrett H. Reasoner" <Breasoner@Gibbs-Bruns.com>
	07/27/2000 11:40 AM

		 To: "'Sanders, Richard'" <Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Wright

As to the little work I'll do in the near term reading the pleadings and
talking to Charlie re the Wright case, do you want me to set up a new matter
number or just bill it to the Grynberg file? Please let me know.  As always,
we really appreciate the opportunity to represent you. - Barrett


Thanks for the the flexibility,  I believe this will be of great help.  My Co# is 0985 and RC # is 105081

To:	Samuel Harrell/HOU/EES@EES, Brad J Snyder/HOU/EES@EES, John Wack/HOU/EES@EES, Ross Mesquita/NA/Enron@ENRON, Suresh Raghavan/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject:	Re: Retail power RFQs on DealBench

Regarding the lotting strategy, we do intend to be very flexible. Our general recommendation is that the number of lots should be around 10 but if there are situations where it makes sense to have more than 10 lots, we would not have a problem with it.
From a pricing perspective, as long as bids*lots is less than 150, we would treat it in a similar way.

Hope that works for you. Look forward to your confirmation (and the RC#)

Harry

	  From:  Samuel Harrell @ EES                           01/31/2001 09:56 AM

To:	Harry Arora/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:	John Wack/HOU/EES@EES, Brad J Snyder/HOU/EES@EES, Ross Mesquita/NA/Enron@ENRON

Subject:	Re: Retail power RFQs on DealBench

Harry-

Before we go ahead with this, let's revise the first bullet to reflect a more realistic variation of how our soliciations might play out over the first and second quarter of  2001.

As I see it (refer to the attachment for more information), we might conduct, at best, five sealed-bids over the next three months. However, for each of the bids there may be more than 10 lots in each bid. Looking at the attached Notice of Solicitation as an example, we have 7 separate blocks for suppliers to bid having up-to 3 bid scenarios for each block for a total of 21 lots for this phase. The way I see it, future soliciations will follow a similar model.

Having said this, an alternative to the current language would be to have 5-6 sealed bid opportunities with a 20-25 lot limit for each bid. Does this work for you or does this complicate the process for your group?

Please advise....

Sam
5-6785

To:	John Wack/HOU/EES@EES, Brad J Snyder/HOU/EES@EES, Samuel Harrell/HOU/EES@EES, Ross Mesquita/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject:	Retail power RFQs on DealBench

John

We very much enjoyed meeting with you yesterday and discussing opportunities for EES and DealBench to work together.  As we discussed, this email will serve as the framework for our pilot arrangement.  As soon as we receive an email confirmation from you, your team will be able to add deals to the DealBench platform.

3-month access as a standard user (15 sealed-bid deals with up to 10 lots for each deal) .  Months utilitzed do not need to be consecutive, but if a deal is up on DealBench in any day during a calendar month, that month will be inlcuded as part of the three month period.

EES will pay DealBench a fee of $22,500, with $7,500 due immediately, $7,500 due February 28th, and $7,500 due March 31st.  We would like to debit your RC directly to avoid billing overheads.

EES will solely control and be responsible for all business transactions that it conducts on the DealBench platform.  As such, DealBench assumes no liability for any EES business transactions conducted on DealBench.

We believe you will realize significant value from DealBench and look forward to working with you.  As you know, I am going to be happy when we do a Live Auction for you and save you some significant money.  Please confirm, with your RC number that you are IN with this arrangement. We also would want to explore further the larger opportunity - I will try to allocate some-one to work on that one with you next week.

Regards,

Harry Arora

<Embedded StdOleLink>
<Embedded StdOleLink>


http://www.eyeforenergy.com/newsletter/newsletter_200901.htm

[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]				[IMAGE][IMAGE][IMAGE] HOME
EVENTS 	ADVERTISE 	INDUSTRY DIRECTORY 	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]

    Thursday, September 20, 2001 Issue 37   EDITORIAL  Last week's events  As most of you may know, Eyeforenergy held its second annual, Energy Exchanges Online  conference last week in New Orleans.  We'd like to thank the wonderful speakers and sponsors who made the event a very successful one.  For those of you interested in what went on you can take a look at the presentations which are up on the website here .   Normally, after a conference, we'd devote the newsletter to a wrap-up of the conference, some major trends we picked out, etc.  With the events of the last week, however, we thought it fitting that this newsletter focus on the effects wreaked on the energy sector by the recent terrorist attacks.  So in the article below you'll get a look at some possible scenarios for the next few months.   We'd like to once again extend our sympathy to the members of the Eyeforenergy community who have lost friends and colleagues, particularly our friends at Tradespark and eSpeed.  (For those of you interested in making a donation to Cantor Fitzgerald, parent company of Tradespark and eSpeed, please go to http://www.espeed.com/donation.html )   One of the best things about the job we do is the opportunity we get to meet some extraordinary people in the course of putting together our events.  It makes it all the harder when we know that we won't be seeing our trusted friends at the next one.    --Allison Robertshaw, Editor    FOCUS   The Sound of Silence   Last week's tragic events struck at the heart of the energy sector and the world will never be the same. While some of us lost family, friends, acquaintances and business associates, all of us share in the loss. Nationals of 47 countries have been declared dead or missing and 58 countries report some of their citizens, said to have been in the United States on September 11, are still among the 5,700 unaccounted for.  For those of us attending the Energy Exchanges Online II conference in New Orleans, it was particularly emotional as we watched some of our friends and associates come to the realization that their offices were... Click here for Full Story      ADVERTISEMENT  [IMAGE] Eyeforenergy Asia 2001 - PRIZE DRAW! The Shangri-La Hotel, Singapore 15-17 October 2001   There is less than a month to go before Eyeforenergy's October event in Singapore.  We've had a tremendous amount of interest in the show already and have lined up an unrivalled array of speakers to give cutting-edge presentations on all the important issues, including Enron, TotalFinaElf, Unocal and Shell.  As a special offer, each week will will offer one registered attendee a full refund and free ticket for Eyeforenergy Asia 2001!  To enter, simply register  for the event and be sure to mention "prize draw" when you book.  For more information about the event, click here  or email us .  [IMAGE] Landmark Graphics and Petroleum Place -- Accelerating Business Efficiency   Landmark Graphics and Petroleum Place Delivers Enormous Efficiencies within Acquisition and Divestiture. How? Through online delivery of data and evaluation tools within an APS environment to afford dramatic efficiencies for both sellers and buyers.   Visit www.petroleumplace.com   [IMAGE]  Eyeforenergy Emissions Trading 2002 Okura Hotel, Amsterdam 19-21 February 2002   Emissions trading options are ripe for the picking - so how can you make sure you're ready to profit from GHG? Let's face it - you can't really afford not to be, especially as the World Bank has estimated demand in the international GHG trading system to be in the order of US$20 billion per annum by 2010.   Eyeforenergy is delighted to bring you this event which will focus on how you can best seize this exciting new market opportunity. As ever the conference will be driven by the industry leaders in this arena backed up by expert advice from those helping the industry make the right moves in emissions.   For further information, click here   [IMAGE]  NEWS ROUND UP - WEEK IN REVIEW   NEG Micon Unveils Wind Turbines at German Fair   September 17, 2001---NEG Micon will take the wrappers off two new wind turbines at the Windtech Husum wind energy fair being held in Germany September 18-22.  The company announced that one of the turbines was designed for offshore use and the other for onshore use.  The onshore turbine is a low-wind-optimized 1.5-MW model with active-stall regulation for inland sites, model number NM82/1500. The offshore turbine is a 2.5-MW turbine, model number NM80/2500, with pitch regulation and variable speed for offshore and shoreline areas with offshore climatic conditions... Click here for Full Story     Excelergy Introduces Explorer to Deregulated Markets   Lexington, Ma., September 13, 2001---Excelergy Corp has taken the wrappers off a new product designed to resolve the settlement and billing questions and speed up client cash flows.  Excelergy Partner Explorer streamlines a client's operations while reducing back office costs and improving cash collections.  "Excelergy Partner Explorer is another example of how our products are delivering open co-action across the entire value chain of restructuring industries - in this case... Click here for Full Story     Deregulation Draws Players to Texas Electric Market   September 11, 2001---With deregulation set to begin in January 2002, Texas is proving to be a magnet for the retail power market. Centrica plc is the latest to announce their entry into the Texas market by filing its application for Retail Electric Provider status with the Public Utility Commission of Texas.  Active in Europe, operating under several well known consumer brands, Centrica  moved into North America by acquiring Direct Energy , a Canadian retailer.  The company supplies natural gas... Click here for Full Story     RWE Enters U.S. Energy Trading Market   RWE AG of Germany, in an effort to gain a foothold in the U.S. energy market, has created RWE Trading America.  RWE AG of Germany, in an effort to gain a foothold in the U.S. energy market, has created RWE Trading America. The move is a clear indication the company is seeking to build up its energy trading operations in the United States alongside of its European trading business.   The new company will... Click here for Full Story     ACN Energy Leverages Excelergy's Software to Multiply Customer Base   ACN Energy is turning to Excelergy Corp., to provide software solutions to expand its offerings of electricity,   ACN Energy is turning to Excelergy Corp., to provide software solutions to expand its offerings of electricity, natural gas and related products and services to a rapidly growing number of mass market residential and small business consumers in multiple jurisdictions nationwide.   "Partnering... Click here for Full Story     University of Arizona Scientists Seek Ways to Harness Solar Energy   The process involves using a thin film of organic molecules that could be cheaper and more efficient than current technology.  University of Arizona scientists are turning their attention to a new method of harnessing solar energy. The process involves using a thin film of organic molecules that could be cheaper and more efficient than current technology. While the organic solar cells are several years away from harvesting... Click here for Full Story      Latest News Now!       [IMAGE]     EDITORIAL [IMAGE] Last week's events    ARTICLES [IMAGE] The Sound of Silence    NEWS ROUND UP [IMAGE] NEG Micon Unveils Wind Turbines at German Fair  [IMAGE] Excelergy Introduces Explorer to Deregulated Markets  [IMAGE] Deregulation Draws Players to Texas Electric Market  [IMAGE] RWE Enters U.S. Energy Trading Market  [IMAGE] ACN Energy Leverages Excelergy's Software to Multiply Customer Base  [IMAGE] University of Arizona Scientists Seek Ways to Harness Solar Energy     EVENTS [IMAGE]  Eyeforenergy Asia 2001   [IMAGE]  Green Convention 2001   [IMAGE]  EEO Europe - Energy Trading in the New Economy   [IMAGE]  Emissions Trading 2002      SUBSCRIBE   Please enter your email address below to subscribe to the EyeForEnergy newsletter. Thank you        UNSUBSCRIBE  To unsubscribe from the EyeForEnergy newsletter please enter your email below. Thank you       If you have any comments about this newsletter or you would like to suggest future topics or industry related news, please email  bruno@eyeforenergy.com     [IMAGE]


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Harrison, Tyrell
Sent:	Thursday, September 27, 2001 11:00 PM
To:	Tycholiz, Barry; Ward, Kim S (Houston)
Cc:	Whitt, Mark
Subject:	Santa Clara - 092701.ppt

I condensed the two charts into one on the "Santa Clara Load/Supply Profile" page.  Is it too busy?

Also, I have included two pages (10&11) on the forward value of the EPNG capacity.  Which do you like better?  Regardless of which one we use, we do need to talk about the appropriate SJ/Perm split and physical premiums (if any).

I'll call in the morning.

Tyrell


Mary,
I have completed a review of our termination files and identified a few that exercised setoff rights prior to the bankruptcy filing.  Attached is a list showing those identified for ENA and EPMI.

Stephanie Panus
Enron Wholesale Services
ph:  713.345.3249
fax:  713.646.3490


She did teach me to answer SOMEONE'S questions, but I don't even know who
SOMEONES is! She also taught me to embrace my rudeness.

K

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Mark Guzman                           01/30/2001 03:44 PM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: beer?

Didn't your mother teach you that it was rude to not answer someones
questions?