[IMAGE]	 	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]

             [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Upgrades  [IMAGE] DownGrades  [IMAGE] Coverage Initiated  [IMAGE] Coverage Reiterated  [IMAGE] Stock Splits  [IMAGE] Buybacks  [IMAGE] Dividends  [IMAGE] Pos Pre-Announce  [IMAGE] Neg Pre-Announce  [IMAGE] Pos Surprises  [IMAGE] Neg Surprises  [IMAGE] Earnings Revisions  [IMAGE] IPO - Lockup Periods  [IMAGE] IPO - Latest Pricing  [IMAGE] IPO - Quite Periods  [IMAGE] IPO - Postponements  [IMAGE] IPO - Withdrawals  [IMAGE] IPO - Latest Filings     [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] Unsubscribe  [IMAGE] Update  my Membership / Profile  [IMAGE] Forgot  Username / Password  [IMAGE] Add  / Edit Alerts  [IMAGE] View  My Alerts   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]    [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] 	  As requested, your News Alert for TXN  follows from EquityAlert.com.     Texas Instruments Inc. Beat Estimates/Issued Warning     (RealTimeTraders.com) - Texas Instruments Inc. (TXN) reported a narrower than expected third quarter loss after the bell on Wednesday, beating consensus estimates by $0.01 per share. The company issued an earnings warning for the fourth quarter.  Texas Instruments Inc. dropped sharply lower in the first half of yesterday's session and closed down by 1.58 at $29.91 on above average volume. The stock is currently trading lower by 1.51 on 5K shares before the bell on Thursday and was downgraded by Merrill Lynch. Copyright(c) 2001 RealTimeTraders.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved    [IMAGE]    ***IMPORTANT NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER REGARDING THIS COURTESY EMAIL***   At your request, as a subscriber to our service, this email alert is being sent to you as a courtesy and is for information purposes only. We are a financial news re-distributor. We are not an investment advisory and do not purport to tell or suggest which companies you should monitor or which securities you should purchase or sell.   In addition to the information regarding the company you are monitoring (the "Monitored Company"), this email contains advertisements describing products, services or companies for which we receive fees from the advertising companies. In the case of Cybertrader, distribution of this advertisement forms a component of a content exchange agreement with RealTimeTraders.com, Inc. We reserve the right to sell all or part of these shares at anytime, either before, during or after the advertisement period.   In addition, not withstanding our policy of prohibiting employees from buying or selling securities of an advertising company for a period of 20 days following dissemination of the advertisement, we may not be able to effectively monitor our employees to ensure compliance with the same. Consequently, there may be sales and/or purchases of such securities by our employees prior to, during and immediately following the dissemination of the advertisement.   Please note that (1) this email may not contain the full text of the press release issued by, or the research or other reports regarding, the Monitored Company; and (2) the text of the advertisement, the press release and/or reports were obtained from third party sources and were not written, generated or edited by us; accordingly, we make no representations or give any assurance as to the accuracy or completeness, nor have we conducted any independent investigations of, the disclosures regarding the subject matter of such releases and reports.   Please note that links to the advertising company and/or Monitored Company are provided for your convenience. We assume no obligation for the content of such sites.   All information contained herein should be independently verified by you with the advertising company or with Monitored Company or any other sources you prefer.   [THIS IS ONLY A SUMMARY OF, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO, THE "EQUITYALERT SUBSCRIBER AGREEMENT AND DISCLAIMER." PLEASE VISIT http://www.equityalert.com/home/disclaim.asp  FOR ACCESS TO OUR COMPLETE DISCLAIMER]        	[IMAGE]     [IMAGE]


In order to continually develop and make improvements to the functionality of EnronOnline we are rolling out several changes tonight, which will be in effect on Monday August 20, 2001. Some of these changes will affect Stack Manager while others affect the Website. A summary of these changes is listed below.

Stack Manager Changes

Top of Stack limit orders - This feature will allow the price submitted via limit orders to be displayed on the website if their bid or offer is better than the trader's stack price. Stack Manger will list the price and the names of counterparties submitting such orders on the  floated stack window.  Orders will be queued by price and time stamp. When a counterparty trades on a " Top of Stack Entry" it will create back to back transactions; one between Enron and the counterparty submitting the order, and the other between Enron and the counterparty clicking on the website.

In order to turn on this functionality select the " Allowed Top of Stack" option, in the Orders section of the product properties page.  If regular limit order functionality is desired the "Allowed"  option should be selected.

Please note that this feature will be released in a disabled mode and will be turned on sometime next week after determining which business units want to roll this out.

Restricted Top of Stack limit orders - This feature will allow the price submitted only by internal traders via limit orders to be displayed on the website if their bid or offer is better than the trader's stack price. Stack Manger will list price and the names of counterparties submitting such orders on the  floated stack window.  Orders will be queued by price and time stamp. When a counterparty trades on a " Top of Stack Entry" it will create back to back transactions one between Enron and the counterparty submitting the order, and the other between Enron and the counterparty clicking on the website.

In order to turn on this functionality select the " allowed as Restricted Top of Stack" option, in the Orders section of the product properties page.  If regular limit order functionality is desired the "Allowed"  option should be selected. If a product has active orders against it you will not be able to select the "Restricted Top of Stack" feature.

Advanced Filtering Ability on All Products Tab -  Drop down filtering capability is now available for each field in the All Products tab in stack manager. In order to filter click on the arrow next to the field title. A drop down box with a list of attributes will appear. Highlight the attribute by which you wish to filter. To turn off the filter click on the arrow and select the " All" option from the drop down box.

Website Changes

New Submission Screen for Restricted Top of Stack Limit Orders -  The submission screen for  products that allow  Top of Stack or Restricted Top of Stack limit orders is as follows.

The submit button on the left makes a submission for a normal transaction, while the button on the right will submit as a limit order.  In case of the Restricted Top of Stack limit orders only internal traders will see the new submission box.

Price of Limit Orders

Modify Limit Orders
 Customers now have the ability to modify the price of any active order. In order to do so highlight the order to be modified and use the plus or minus sign next to the price field on  at the top of the "Today's Orders" section. The price will move up or down in the same increments as the tick size for that product. Once the price is at the desired level click the "Set" button and the price will be modified. Another way to modify the price on a limit order is to click on the price field on a particular limit order.  You will see a box with plus, minus and set buttons that allow you to modify that order.

Expiration time for Limit Orders
Customers can now place limit orders with expiration times of up to 30 days. Currently they may place orders for only up to 12 hours.

Float the Today's Orders Section
You can now float the " Limit Order " section. In order to do so, right click in the "Today's Orders " section and select the float window option. In order to make the window " Stay On Top " right click on the floated window and select the stay on top option.

Mid Market Client - Mid market originators will now have the ability to transact on behalf of their customers, while including their desired margin on the trade, on EnronOnline products. In order to do so Click on the bid or offer price, a customised submission window will appear.  Select the counterparty for whom you wish to transact from a drop down list , enter the desired customer price and margin and click submit. For example if a customer wants to buy Nymex Sep 01 at 3.36 and you wish to have a 1 cent margin, please enter 3.36 as the desired price and 0.01 as the margin. The system will trade the order when the EnronOnline offer for Nymex Sep 01 is at 3.35, book the trade at 3.36 and record the 0.01 origination amount.

In order to be set up to use this functionality. Please call the EnronOnline Product Control Group.

Changes to Website Passwords - As an added security measure, which has been requested by many customers, some new password rules have been instituted. First, the password cannot be equal to the login ID. Second, each user will be prompted to change his password every 90 days. These rules apply to all website passwords for both internal and external users.

Please note  Stack Manager changes will be available all traders as of Monday August 20, 2001. The changes to the website will be rolled out to a few internal users on Monday with the rest of the internal users being upgraded Monday night, and external users by the end of the week.  Over the next couple of weeks all users will be prompted to change their website passwords.

If you have any questions regarding these changes please contact me at 713-853-1787.

Savita Puthigai

<Embedded Paintbrush Picture>


THE BEST JUST GOT BETTER.

Thanks to the newly redesigned martindale.com, finding  information about law
firms and lawyers has never been  easier. That's because we've moved the
Lawyer Locator to  the front of the site with enhanced search functionality
and  more comprehensive search results. We've also added a host of new and
improved features, including:
? LegalBiz OnlineTM
? CLE Center
? Banner Sponsorships
? Meetings and Conferences
? Law Digest - Coming soon!
? Dispute Resolution Directory - Coming soon!To find out why martindale.com
is where you need to be,  click here.

To unsubscribe to Martindale-Hubbell Company News  emails, please click the
link below.

UNSUBSCRIBE


With the exception of the message for the severance issues,  attached documents represent the A,B,C,&D, category scripts to be used by supervisors / Notifiers to communicate with employees.  I have consolidated the scripts into one document for your ease and review.  Distributions will be as four separate documents.  The second attachment contains the Script talking point matrix.  Please review these for mandatory change.  Training documents will be prepared for distribution by 10 AM Wednesday.  Your prompt review and concurrence is needed.  Regards, Rj.


GE has agreed to the requested changes to the parent guaranty.

Kay

"Campbell, Carolyn" <CCampbell@KSLAW.com> on 04/24/2001 10:40:53 AM
To: "'kay.mann@enron.com'" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Delta Documents for GE

 <<GE.LegalOpin.DOC>>  <<GE.Consent.DOC>>  <<GE.Receipt.DOC>>
<<GE.Ltr.Forms.DOC>>

Kay:

We have attached execution copies of the following documents for execution
by GE:

1.  GE Letter re Forms of Agreement;
2.  GE Consent and Agreement;
3.  Legal Opinion of Counsel to GE;
4.  GE Receipt.

These documents were circulated by Isabel Parker to Kent Shoemaker, you, me
and others on April 23, 2001.

The only other document is the GE Parent Guaranty.  Greg Lang circulated
comments (in a PDF file) by an e-mail 4/18 at 5:59 p.m.   Greg asked earlier
today whether the form of this document had been agreed by GE and I could
not respond.

You should have the following documents:

1.  Assignment and Assumption Agreement; and
2.  Turbine Contract.

Several of the ENA documents are not yet finalized, so I will try to get
those to you after lunch.  Please send over the LLC certificate book in
order that we may prepare membership certificates.

If you have any questions or comments, please advise.  Thanks.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King & Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com>

Enclosures

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

 - GE.LegalOpin.DOC
 - GE.Consent.DOC
 - GE.Receipt.DOC
 - GE.Ltr.Forms.DOC


Start Date: 4/18/01; HourAhead hour: 16;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041816.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 16 / Preferred:   0.00 / Final:  12.00)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/18/01
  TIE_POINT: FCORNR_5_PSUEDO
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_MONKEY
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 16 / Preferred:   0.00 / Final:  12.00)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/18/01
  TIE_POINT: SLVRPK_7_SPP
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_MONKEY
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL


Post Date: April 19, 2001
Category: SHORT-TERM FIRM CAPACITY
Subcategory: NWP OFFERS
Subject: 01-235 NWP Available Capacity

Notice Text:
All Shippers Notification:? 01-235?????? Dated : April 19, 2001

NORTHWEST PIPELINE'S
NOTICE OF AVAILABLE AND
POTENTIALLY AVAILABLE FIRM
TRANSPORTATION CAPACITY1)

NOTE:? REMAINING LIMITED TERM
MITIGATED TRANSPORTATION
CAPACITY HAS BEEN ADDED TO
THIS NOTICE

**********************************************************************
Capacity Below Available
?for TF-1 Service Only

??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
??????? Total???? Available
Pkg? Receipt Point2)????????? Delivery Point2)?????????? Dth/d?????? Date3)??

A??? Sumas?????????????????????????? Puget(Canyon)??????????? 15,000??????
NOW-
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
??????????????????????? 10/14/01

B??? Sumas????? ?????????????????????? Kern River/Muddy Crk.? 8,272????? NOW-
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????????????????????? 06/01/03

B-1? Sumas????? ?????????????????????? Kern River/Muddy Crk.? 1,500 9)
11/01/01-
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
????????????????????????? 06/01/03

C??? Sumas(1160)??????????????? Kemmerer?????????????????????? 2,750??????
NOW
???? Ignacio Plant(1590)

D??? Sumas(2,390)?????????????? Monticello(330)??????????????? 6,016??????
NOW
???? Ignacio(3,626)??????????????? Rio Algom(300)
???????????????????????????????????????????? Moab#2(1,861)
???????????????????????????????????????????? Moab(2,283)
???????????????????????????????????????????? Arches National Park(17)
???????????????????????????????????????????? Vernal(653)
???????????????????????????????????????????? Dutch John(125)
???????????????????????????????????????????? Redwash(447)

E??? Starr Road??????????????????? Inland Paper???????????????????????
830??????? 05/01/01 8)

F??? Stanfield?????????????????????? Stanfield???????????????????????????
3,681??????? 06/01/01 9)

F-1? Stanfield????????????????????? Stanfield?????????????????????????
14,490??????? 04/01/02 10)

G??? Shute Creek?????????????? Ignacio-Bondad (EPNG)? 10,000?????? NOW

G-1? Shute Creek????????????? Ignacio-Bondad (EPNG)? 40,000?????? 06/01/01 9)

G-2? Shute Creek????????????? Ignacio-Bondad (EPNG)? 25,000?????? 11/01/01 9)

H??? Opal Plant??????????????????? Western Mkt Center?????? 90,000??????
06/01/01 9)

I??? Painter???????????????????????? Muddy Creek (KERN)?????????? 8,351??????
05/01/01 8)

I-1? Painter??????????????????????? Muddy Creek (KERN)???????? 35,000??????
06/01/01 9)

J??? Western Mkt Center?? Crossover 16-Questar?? 50,415?????? 06/01/01 7) 9)

K??? Western Mkt Center?? Clay Basin`???????????????????????? 4,585??????
06/01/01 7) 9)

L??? Crossover 16?????????????? Green River-CIG?????????????? 23,152??????
NOW 7) 8)

M??? Crossover 16????????????? Clay Basin????????????????????????
10,000??????? 06/01/01 7) 9)

M-1? Crossover 16???????????? Clay Basin???????????????????????? 17,263??????
NOW 7)

N??? Green Rvr/McKinn-CIG Clay Basin??????????????????????? 23,152??????
05/01/01 7) 8)

O??? Clay Basin??????????????????? Chevron Rangely(6093)???? 7,488???????
06/01/01 9)
????????????????????????????????????????????? Vernal (1395)

P??? Clay Basin???????????????????? Redwash/Questar??????????? 19,240??????
11/01/01 7) 9)

Q??? Clay Basin???????????????????
Rifle?????????????????????????????????????? 1,850??????? NOW 7)

Q-1? Clay Basin?????????????????? Rifle??????????????????????????????????????
7,770??????? 06/01/01 7) 9)

R??? Clay Basin??????????????????? American Soda Ash??????????? 1,140???????
NOW 7) 8)

S??? Jensen (Ut Gas Svc)? Green River-CIG????????????????????? 316???????
06/01/01 8) 9)

T??? Redwash/Chevron????? Green River-CIG????????????????? 1,850??????? NOW
8)

U??? Redwash/QPC????????????? Rifle??????????????????????????????????????
1,050??????? 06/01/01 7) 9)
????
V??? Greasewood?????????????? Clay Basin????????????????????????????
2,765??????? NOW 8)

W??? Piceance Quick Cycle Green River-CIG???????????????? 1,005??????? NOW 8)

X??? Barrett??????????????????????????? Kern River??????????????????????????
4,097??????? 06/01/01 9)
?
Y??? Barrett?????????????????????????? Green River-CIG?????????????????
6,460??????? NOW 8)

Z??? North Douglas????????????? Green River-CIG????????????????? 3,178???????
NOW 8)

AA?? Sand Springs????????????? Ignacio-Bondad (EPNG)?? 23,148??????? 11/01/01
4,10)

BB?? West Douglas???????????? Clay Basin???????????????????????????
2,354???????? NOW 8)

CC?? Calf Canyon(410)??????? Kern River?????????????????????????????
703??????? 01/01/02 9)
???? Foundation Crk.(293)

DD?? Lisbon?????????????????????????? Green River-CIG???????????????
2,600???????? NOW 8)

EE?? Grand Valley????????????????? Green River-CIG??????????????
1,137???????? NOW 8)

FF?? Grand Gas????????????????????? Green River-CIG??????????????
1,000????????? NOW 8)

GG?? Ignacio Plant???????????????? Green River-CIG???????????? 10,000????????
06/01/01 9)

GG-1 Ignacio Plant?????????????? Green River-CIG?????????????? 1,424?????????
NOW 8)

GG-2 Ignacio Plant?????????????? Green River-CIG?????????????? 1,177?????????
NOW

GG-3 Ignacio Plant????????????? Green River-CIG??????????????? 5,000?????????
05/01/01 10)

HH?? Ignacio Plant??????????????? Grand Junction?????????????????
4,000????????? 06/01/01 9)

HH-1 Ignacio Plant??????????????? Grand Junction????????????????
4,310????????? NOW 8)

II?? Ignacio Plant??????????????????? Ignacio -Bondad (EPNG) 25,000?????????
NOW 8)

II-1 Ignacio Plant?????????????????? Ignacio -Bondad (EPNG) 25,000????????
11/01/01 9)

JJ?? Blanco Hub-TW????????????? Green River-CIG????????????? 24,000????????
06/01/01 9)

JJ-1 Blanco Hub-TW???????????? Green River-CIG????????????? 61,463????????
NOW

**********************************************************************
Jackson Prairie Receipt Point Capacity
Available for TF-1 or TF-2 Service as specified
below

KK?? Jackson Prairie??????????? SIPI???????????????????????????????????
47,341?????????? NOW 5)8)
???? (55,715)????????????????????????????
Lynden????????????????????????????????? 592?????
???????????????????????????????????????????????
Lawrence?????????????????????????????? 81??????
???????????????????????????????????????????????
ACME?????????????????????????????????????? 68??????
??????????????????????????????????????????????? Mt.
Vernon?????????????????????????? 115?????
???????????????????????????????????????????????
Sedro/Woolley????????????????? 3,988???
??????????????????????????????????????????????? LDS
Church????????????????????????? 133?????
??????????????????????????????????????????????? Granite
Falls????????????????????? 1,536???
???????????????????????????????????????????????
Machias????????????????????????????? 1,840???
??????????????????????????????????????????????
Snohomish????????????????????????????? 21??????

LL?? Jackson Prairie??????????? Echo Lake???????????????????????????????
33?????? NOW 5)8)
???? (7,530)?????????????????????????????? Duval/Cottage Lake?????????????
183????
???????????????????????????????????????????????
Redmond??????????????????????????? 3,293??
??????????????????????????????????????????????? May
Valley???????????????????????????? 300
??????????????????????????????????????????????? Lake
Francis????????????????????? 2,808??
??????????????????????????????????????????????
Covington?????????????????????????????? 263????
??????????????????????????????????????????????? Black
Diamond????????????????????? 450????
???????????????????????????????????????????????
Enumclaw????????????????????????????? 200????

MM?? Jackson Prairie????????? Sedro/Woolley?????????????????? 8,300?????
05/01/04 5)10)

NN?? Jackson Prairie??????????? South Lake?????????????????????? 35,500?????
NOW 6)
??
OO?? Jackson Prairie??????????? Idaho State Pen.??????????????? 1,735?????
NOW 6)

PP?? Jackson Prairie???????????? Kern River/Muddy Crk.? 98,069????? NOW 6)

QQ?? Jackson Prairie???????????? Shute Creek???????????????????? 7,688??????
NOW 6)

RR?? Jackson Prairie????????????? Pocatello??????????????????????????
1,198?????? NOW 6)

************************************************************************
Mitigated Volumes for 2001
Only available for Time Periods Listed

SS?? Sumas??????????????? Reno Lateral?????????? 2,385?? April Only

SS-1 Sumas??????????????? Reno Lateral?????????? 3,399?? May Only

SS-2 Sumas??????????????? Reno Lateral?????????? 3,764?? June Only

SS-3 Sumas??????????????? Reno Lateral?????????? 4,243?? July Only

SS-4 Sumas??????????????? Reno Lateral?????????? 4,341?? August Only

SS-5 Sumas??????????????? Reno Lateral?????????? 3,922?? September Only

SS-6 Sumas??????????????? Reno Lateral?????????? 2,076?? October Only

TT?? Sumas??????????????? LaGrande???????????????????? 500?? Jun, Jul, Aug
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
??????? or Sept --
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
?????? or Jun - Sept
?
UU?? Sumas??????????????? Spokane Mead?????????? 2813??? Jun, Jul, Aug
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????? or Sept -
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????? or Jun - Sept

VV?? Starr Road?????????? Spokane-Kettle Falls?? 401??? Jun, Jul, Aug
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
?????????? or Sept -
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
?????????? or Jun - Sept

WW?? Klamath????????????? Klamath???????????????????????? 263???? Jun, Jul,
Aug
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
?????????? or Sept -
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
??????????? or Jun - Sept

XX?? Sumas??????????????? Reno??????????????????????????????? 281???? Jun,
Jul, Aug
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
?????????? or Sept -
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
?????????? or Jun - Sept

************************************************************************

1) This notification supercedes all previous Notices of Available and
Potentially Available Capacity and is subject to change at any time.

2) Other receipt and delivery points utilizing the described
??? transportation corridor may be available.

3)? Potential Availability date for the Capacity.

4)? Contracts shall include the following subordinate scheduling
??? provision if the requested term extends into a critical operational
??? period:

To the extent Shipper's nominated volumes are not scheduled solely
due to Shipper's subordinate scheduling priorities set forth below,
the monthly base reservation charge will be discounted to $0.00 per
Dth for that quantity only.

Section 14.1(c)(i) of Northwest's tariff is modified to condition
Shipper's primary corridor rights through any mainline constraint
from the Sand Springs receipt point to the Ignacio Bondad (or
LaPlata-TW) delivery point(s) to have a scheduling priority which
will be subordinate to the scheduling priority for any firm shipper
with primary corridor rights that encompass and extend beyond the
Sand Springs to Ignacio Bondad (or LaPlata-TW) corridor.

5) Available for TF-1 or TF-2 transportation service.? TF-2 service
will not be discounted below Northwest's current Tariff filed rate
for TF-2 service.? Additionally, TF2 service must be linked to
requester's designated storage contract or storage ownership
right. TF-2 service shall include the following subordinate
scheduling priority language:

Section 14.1(d)(i) of Northwest's tariff is modified to condition
Shipper's primary corridor rights from the Jackson Prairie receipt
point to the _____________ delivery point to have a scheduling
priority at any northflow constraint point in that corridor that is
subordinate to the scheduling priority for any firm service with
unconditioned primary corridor rights through such constraint point.

6)??? Available for TF-2 transportation service only. TF-2 service will
not be discounted below Northwest's current Tariff filed rate for
TF-2 service.? Additionally, TF2 service must be linked to
requester's designated storage contract or storage ownership
right.? TF-2 service shall include the following subordinate
scheduling priority language:

Section 14.1(d)(i) of Northwest's tariff is modified to condition
Shipper's primary corridor rights from the Jackson Prairie receipt
point to the _____________ delivery point to have a scheduling
priority at any southflow constraint point in that corridor that is
subordinate to the scheduling priority for any firm service with
unconditioned primary corridor rights through such constraint point.

7)??? Capacity is not to exceed a one month primary term with evergreen
?? language.? Any offers with terms greater than one month will need to
?? be evaluated for possible seasonal flow conditions that may restrict
?? the available capacity beyond a one month term.

8)??? This capacity is currently under contract with an evergreen clause
??? This capacity can be made available by providing one business day
?? written termination notification to the current holder of the
????? capacity.? This means that termination notification must be received
no later than 5:00 p.m. Mountain Current Time, 24 hours (1 business
day) prior to the effective date of the contract termination.

9)??? This capacity is currently under contract with an evergreen clause.
?? This capacity can be made available by providing ten business days
prior written termination notification to the current holder of the
capacity.? This means termination notification must be received no
later than 5:00 p.m. Mountain Current Time on the eleventh business
day prior to the beginning of the next month.

10) This capacity is currently under contract and does not contain an
?? evergreen clause.

11) This capacity is "mitigated" capacity and will not contain an
?????? evergreen clause.

12) This capacity is available only for the term offered.? No evergreen
clause available.

13)??? This capacity is currently under contract with an evergreen clause.
????? This capacity can be made available by providing a one year prior
????? written termination notification to the current holder of the
????? capacity.

14) Available for TF-2 transportation service only. TF-2 service will
????? not be discounted below Northwest's current Tariff filed rate for
????? TF-2 service.? Additionally, TF2 service must be linked to
????? requester's designated storage contract or storage ownership
????? right.

PROCEDURE FOR REQUESTING AVAILABLE AND
POTENTIALLY AVAILABLE
TRANSPORTATION CAPACITY

To request Potentially Available Transportation Capacity available on
the first day of June 2001, Shipper must submit a Prearranged Offer in
the form of the Letter Agreement provided below.? This Letter Agreement
must be received by Northwest no later than 5:00 pm Central Time on May
15, 2001.? Northwest will accept or reject the Prearranged Offer by no
later than the end of the gas day on May 16, 2001. If the Prearranged
Offer is acceptable, Northwest will provide a 10-bursiness day prior
termination notice to the current holder of the Capacity, post the
Prearranged Offer for bid, and Award the capacity no later than two
business days after the Bid Close Date.? Unless otherwise specified in
this posting, bids will be evaluated and awarded pursuant to the
procedure set forth in Northwest's tariff.

To request the Potentially Available Transportation Capacity with the
one business day termination provisions as indicated by footnote "8)",
?Shipper must submit a Prearranged Offer in the form of the Letter
Agreement provided below.? Upon receipt of this Letter Agreement
Northwest will either accept or reject the Prearranged Offer within
24-hours. If the Prearranged Offer is acceptable, Northwest will provide
the one business day termination notice to the current holder of the
Capacity, post the Prearranged Offer for bid, and Award the capacity no
later than two business days after the Bid Close Date.? Unless otherwise
specified in this posting, bids will be evaluated and awarded pursuant
to the procedure set forth in Northwest's tariff.

To request Available Transportation Capacity, Shipper must immediately
submit a Prearranged Offer in the form of the Letter Agreement provided
below.? Northwest will accept or reject the Prearranged Offer within two
(2) business days of receipt of the prearranged offer.? If the
Prearranged Offer is acceptable, Northwest will post the Prearranged
Offer for bid, and Award the capacity no later than two business days
after the Bid Close Date.? Unless otherwise specified in this posting,
bids will be evaluated and awarded pursuant to the procedure set forth
in Northwest's tariff. Northwest has the right to re-post Available
capacity for bid ith or without prearranged offers.

??????? _________________(Date)

____________________________ (Company Name)
____________________________ (Company Address)
____________________________ (City, State, Zip)

VIA FACSIMILE - (801) 584-7076

Northwest Pipeline Corporation
c/o Williams Gas Pipelines - West
Attn: Candace C.? Karpakis
295 Chipeta Way
Salt Lake City, UT 84158

Re:???? Prearranged Offer for Available or Potentially Available
Transportation Capacity on Williams' Northwest Pipeline Transmission System

Dear Candace:

_______________________ ("Shipper") submits the following bid for available
or potentially available transportation capacity ("Capacity") designated as
package _____ on Northwest Pipeline Corporation's ("Northwest") "Notice of
Available or Potentially Available Firm Transportation Capacity" dated April
19, 2001.?? Shipper recognizes and agrees that the Capacity will be subject
to the Special Conditions set forth in this posting.? Shipper's request? is??
or?? is not?? (circle one) contingent upon confirmation that its offered
discount rate provides use of receipt/delivery points outside the
receipt/delivery point corridor specified in the package.? If maximum rate is
offered, this provision does not apply.? Shipper understands that its
prearranged offer is subject to the Special Conditions described below.

Shipper understands that Northwest will post the prearranged details of this
offer for such Capacity for bidding and Shipper will have the right to match
the highest bid value upon close of the bid process.? Northwest will not
disclose the identity of the prearranged bidder in such posting.

Service Type:?????????? TF-1 Large Customer

Contract Demand(Dth/d): ____________________

Receipt Point(s) ______________________________________________________

Delivery Point(s)______________________________________________________

Daily Reservation Rate: $_______/Dth? (applicable surcharges, volumetric
charge & fuel are additive)

Term:______________________________to___________________________________

Evergreen Requested (circle one):?????? Yes?? or???? No

Identity of any affiliate of Northwest involved in Shipper's transaction:
Indicate "None" or "Name the Affiliate":
_________________________________________________

Northwest's acceptance of Shipper's prearranged offer for the Capacity
will constitute a binding agreement between Northwest and Shipper.
Shipper shall be awarded the Capacity at the terms agreed upon in this
Letter Agreement if no bids are received with a greater economic value for
such Capacity during the bid process. If Shipper elects to match a bid
with a greater economic value, it shall be awarded the Capacity according
to the terms of the matched bid. Shipper agrees to electronically execute
a service agreement on Northwest's Electronic Bulletin Board which
confirms the terms of the final accepted transaction.

If you have questions or comments regarding the above referenced
information, please contact __________________________ at
______________________(Phone Number) ______________________(Fax Number).

Sincerely,

______________________________
?????????????? (Name)
______________________________
?????????????? (Title)

(Accepted? /? Rejected) by Northwest:

Date: _______________?? Name: ________________________________

SPECIAL CONDITIONS
(For Prearranged Offer Agreement)

If the prearranged offer for the Capacity is accepted at a discount rate
which provides for the use of receipt/delivery points outside the
specified receipt/delivery point corridor for the Capacity, the accepted
prearranged offered discount rate shall apply no matter which receipt and
delivery points are utilized by Shipper, or any temporary replacement
Shipper, under capacity release transactions, including segmented
releases.? If the accepted prearranged offered discount rate for the
Capacity does not provide for use of receipt/delivery points outside the
specified receipt/delivery point corridor for the Capacity, the accepted
prearranged offered discount rate shall apply to Shipper, or any temporary
replacement Shipper, only to the extent that both Shipper and any
temporary replacement Shipper utilize receipt points within their
respective primary firm receipt/delivery point to primary firm delivery
point corridors, otherwise, Shipper will be liable for Northwest's maximum
tariff rates.

If you are interested in discussing any of the
Available or Potentially Available Capacity, please
call Candace Karpakis at (801) 584-6996 (work) or at
(801) 971-5983 (cellular).

Word:F:\NWP Capacity Postings\2001 All Shipper Notices\01-235 4-19-01
includes Remaining Mitigated
??


Here is the ARM draft.  Kingerski, Williams and I are in the process of
considering how to meld the two comments, continue to issue separate
comments or just go with one.  Mike

-----Original Message-----
From: Harry.Kingerski@enron.com [mailto:Harry.Kingerski@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 2:05 PM
To: mday@gmssr.com
Subject: AReM/WPTF Updated Draft Filing Concerning the Proposed
Decisions on Direct Access and the PX Credit

----- Forwarded by Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron on 06/22/2001 04:04 PM -----

                    Susan J Mara

                                         To:     Robert C
Williams/Enron@EnronXGate
                    06/22/2001           cc:     Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron,
                    10:02 AM             James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron,
Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Vicki
                                         Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Wanda
Curry/HOU/EES@EES, Paul
                                         Kaufman/Enron@EnronXGate

                                         Subject:     AReM/WPTF Updated
Draft Filing Concerning the Proposed
                                         Decisions on Direct Access and the
PX Credit

Here is the updated draft of joint WPTF and AReM comments.

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 06/22/2001 07:58 AM -----

                    "Dan Douglass"

                    <douglass@eart        To:     "Tamara Johnson"
<tjohnso8@enron.com>, "Robert Berry"
                    hlink.net>            <berry@apx.com>, "Denice Cazalet
Purdum" <dpurdum@apx.com>, "Ed
                                          Cazalet" <ed@cazalet.com>, "Bill
Ross" <billr@calpine.com>, "Bob
                    06/21/2001            Anderson"
<Bob_Anderson@apses.com>, "Carolyn Baker"
                    07:17 PM              <cabaker@duke-energy.com>,
"Charles Miessner"
                                          <camiessn@newwestenergy.com>,
"Corby Gardiner"
                                          <jcgardin@newwestenergy.com>,
"Curt Hatton" <curt.hatton@neg.pge.com>,
                                          "Curtis Kebler"
<curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com>, "Gary Ackerman"
                                          <foothillservices@mindspring.com>,
"George Vaughn"
                                          <gavaughn@duke-energy.com>, "Greg
Blue" <gtbl@dynegy.com>, "Jack
                                          Pigott" <jackp@calpine.com>,
"Janie Mollon"
                                          <jsmollon@newwestenergy.com>,
"Jeff Dasovich"
                                          <jeff.dasovich@enron.com>, "Joe
Paul" <jmpa@dynegy.com>, "Nam Nguyen"
                                          <nam.nguyen@powersrc.com>, "Randy
Hickok" <rjhickok@duke-energy.com>,
                                          "Rob Nichol"
<rsnichol@newwestenergy.com>, "Roger Pelote"
                                          <roger.pelote@williams.com>,
"Steve Huhman" <steve.huhman@mirant.com>,
                                          "Sue Mara"
<susan_j_mara@enron.com>, "Vicki Sandler"
                                          <vicki_sandler@apses.com>, "ARM"
<arem@electric.com>
                                          cc:

                                          Subject:     Draft Filing
Concerning the Proposed Decisions on Direct
                                          Access and the PX Credit

Attached for your review and comment is a proposed Joint Filing to be made
by the Alliance for Retail Energy Markets and the Western Power Trading
Forum  concerning the draft decisions of ALJ Barnett and Commissioner
Bilas.

Comments would be appreciated as soon as possible, as this filing must be
made on Monday.? Thanks!

Dan

Law Offices of Daniel W. Douglass
5959 Topanga Canyon Blvd.? Suite  244
Woodland Hills, CA 91367
Tel:?? (818) 596-2201
Fax:?  (818) 346-6502
douglass@energyattorney.com

(See attached file: Blank Bkgrd.gif)
(See attached file: 6-25-01 Joint Comments - Draft 1.doc)

 - Blank Bkgrd.gif
 - 6-25-01 Joint Comments - Draft 1.doc


Ivonne Brown submitted your anniversary increases in time for you to be paid on your June 29 paychecks.  Unfortunately I was out of the office due to a death in my immediate family from 05/29-06/11 and have been trying to catch up every since.  Your anniversary increases will be on your July 13 payroll checks.  Sorry for the inconvenience.

Thanks in advance,
Gwendolyn B. Gray
Sr. Human Resources Assistant
Associate & Analyst Program
EB 3537b
713-853-5234
713-646-5781 - Fax
gwendolyn.gray@enron.com


Merchant Peaker Comp_DCF
Ben
---------------------- Forwarded by Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT on 05/26/2000
03:45 PM ---------------------------

"Bayless, Randy" <randy.bayless@csfb.com> on 05/26/2000 12:12:33 PM
To: "'benjamin.rogers@enron.com'" <benjamin.rogers@enron.com>
cc: "Stinebaugh, John" <john.stinebaugh@csfb.com>
Subject: Peaking Power Plant & Costs

 <<Comps_DCF1.xls>>

This has the sources for all of the projects as we discussed.  If you have
any questions give me a call at 713-220-6791.

Randy Bayless

This message is for the named person's use only.  It may contain
confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information.  No
confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.
If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all
copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the
sender.  You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute,
print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended
recipient. CREDIT SUISSE GROUP and each of its subsidiaries each reserve
the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks.  Any
views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except
where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state
them to be the views of any such entity.

 - Comps_DCF1.xls


Welcome back.
PL


_______________________________________________________________

This message and any attachments are intended for the individual or entity
named above.  If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read,
copy, use or disclose this communication to others; also please notify the
sender by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system.
Thank you.
_______________________________________________________________

     Please find below SCGC's cross-examination estimates, based upon the
prepared testimony that I have received to date:

     Lorenz         3.25
     Nelson         0.25
     Pocta          1.75
     Beach          1.25
     Dasovich  0.25
     Counihan  0.75
     Burkholder     0.5
     Amirault  0.5
     Zaiontz        0.5
     McKelvey  0.25
     McConn    0.25
     Weaver    0.25
     Wright         0.75
     Fawcett        0.25
     Hall      0.5
     Black          0.25
     Orndorff       0.25

There are several parties from which I received opening testimony but, to
date, no reply testimony.  If reply testimony filters in or other
unforeseen events occur, there may be a need to revise these estimates.


tell grandma i can't wait to hear her sing.


Will the LME transactions go under a relevant financial master, if any, or
will they always be standalone under the GTC?


Are these students first or second years?  If they are first years, we did
not have a single one submit a resume for the Summer Associate position.

Michele Nezi Marvin
Manager
Enron Broadband Services
(713)853-6848

	Kristin Gandy@ENRON
	01/03/01 10:17 AM

		 To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, William Keeney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Catherine
Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rajesh Chettiar/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Tom
Dutta/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jayshree Desai/HOU/ECT@ECT, Colin Jackson/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Laura Howenstine/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Michele Nezi Marvin/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Jennifer Fraser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Natalie
Halich/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Ranabir
Dutt/Corp/Enron@Enron, Teresa Dyar/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Golden/HOU/EES@EES,
Charles Ward/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sarah Wesner/Corp/Enron@Enron, Li
Sun/NA/Enron@Enron, Gillian Johnson/NA/Enron@Enron, Lisa
Connolly/NA/Enron@Enron, Michael J Popkin/NA/Enron@Enron, Kevin
McGowan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Evan Betzer/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Jebong Lee/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Chu Chu
Wang/Corp/Enron@Enron, Brad Hitch/EU/Enron@Enron, Betsy Bassis/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Matthew Goering/HOU/ECT@ECT, Claude
Tellis/Enron@EnronXGate
		 cc:
		 Subject: Tiger Team - Wharton Participants

Attached below is a list of individuals that will be participating in the
tiger team event at Enron in Houston on the 18th of January.  Keep these
people in mind when it comes time to pick candidates to interview for the
Spring.  Call if you have any questions and I am still looking for Wharton
Alum who would like to attend the dinner at Churrasco's that same evening.
Thank you,

Kristin
---------------------- Forwarded by Kristin Gandy/NA/Enron on 01/03/2001
10:14 AM ---------------------------

Melinda McCarty
01/03/2001 09:43 AM
To: Kristin Gandy/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Tiger Team - Wharton Participants

Vincent Chen
Nicholas Levitt
Deepa Mallik
Jack Rejtman
Heather Thorne
Donna Piazze
Kim Whitsel
Tulika Bhalla
Jaideep Singh
Edson Otani
Joshua Leventhal
Pat Henahan
Gustavo Palazzi
Clay DeGiacinto
Steve Lessar
Ram Vittal
Omar Bassel
Jason Cummins
Dennis Feerick


Let me know when and where.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Geaccone, Tracy
Sent:	Thursday, October 18, 2001 10:24 AM
To:	Centilli, James
Subject:	RE: LaPlata DRA Application Cost Estimate

Can we discuss?  Wha about next the first of next week?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Centilli, James
Sent:	Wednesday, October 17, 2001 9:04 AM
To:	Geaccone, Tracy
Subject:	RE: LaPlata DRA Application Cost Estimate

The project can not be justified, if you have the capital cost of the pigging facilities.  On a stand alone basis without the pigging facilities we can justify the project.

James

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Geaccone, Tracy
Sent:	Monday, October 15, 2001 3:48 PM
To:	Centilli, James
Subject:	FW: LaPlata DRA Application Cost Estimate

Have you had a chance to run this?  If not, when do you think you will?

Thanks

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Sturn, John
Sent:	Monday, October 15, 2001 2:24 PM
To:	Geaccone, Tracy
Subject:	RE: LaPlata DRA Application Cost Estimate

Tracy,

Have you made any progress on the economic analysis?

Thanks,

John

---------------------- Forwarded by John Sturn/ET&S/Enron on 10/15/2001 02:22 PM ---------------------------
From:	John Sturn on 09/17/2001 07:18 AM
To:	Tracy Geaccone/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:	Rich Jolly/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Earl Chanley/ENRON@enronXgate, Ben Asante/ENRON@enronXgate, Gary Choquette/ENRON@enronXgate, Kim Kouri/ENRON@enronXgate

Subject:	RE: LaPlata DRA Application Cost Estimate   << OLE Object: StdOleLink >>

Tracy,

10,000 MMBTU/D of incremental capacity from LaPlata to Gallup.

This is the working assumption from our initial conference call.  Like the +/- 30% cost figures below, it may vary with further evaluation, but I suggest it be used for this initial analysis.

Thanks,

John

From:	Tracy Geaccone/ENRON@enronXgate on 09/16/2001 01:25 PM
To:	John Sturn/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:	Rich Jolly/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Earl Chanley/ENRON@enronXgate, Ben Asante/ENRON@enronXgate, Gary Choquette/ENRON@enronXgate, Kim Kouri/ENRON@enronXgate

Subject:	RE: LaPlata DRA Application Cost Estimate

How much additional capacity/volumes will I get?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Sturn, John
Sent:	Friday, September 14, 2001 5:50 PM
To:	Geaccone, Tracy
Cc:	Jolly, Rich; Chanley, Earl; Asante, Ben; Choquette, Gary; Kouri, Kim
Subject:	LaPlata DRA Application Cost Estimate

Tracy,

Below are the rough cost estimates to apply drag reducing agent to the LaPlata to Bloomfield line.

	Facility modifications			$1,665,000

	Cleaning & application			   $165,000

	Re-application every 6 months		   $165,000

The facility modifications include a launcher at LaPlata, receiver at Bloomfield and a filter separator at the El Paso Blanco delivery.  The cleaning & application and re-applications costs include cleaning pig runs with methanol and surfactant as well costs for the actual DRA application.

For analyzing sensitivities, all costs are +/- 30%.  The re-application time period is also uncertain.  You may want to look at the economics of re-apply as often as every three months and as infrequently as every 12 months.

Please let me know of anything else you need.

Thanks,

John


What's your AOL IM name?

Larry Jester
Enron Power Marketing Inc.
Phone:  713-853-5266
Fax:      713-646-8272


I know you guys have been working to secure supply for the H. Galleon.  I
wonder if we should do some sort of tender for fob princing, allowing us
whatever freedom we want with the ship.  I'm not sure we should kill
ourselves for a few pennies--I'd even let the ship stay empty and maybe force
some of our will on the LNG market if possible, in effect creating more of a
spot market.  Maybe EOL.   Any thoughts?

Jeff


----- Forwarded by Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT on 06/05/2001 11:52 AM -----

	ARSystem <ARSystem@mailman.enron.com>
	06/04/2001 07:23 PM

		 To: "elizabeth.sager@enron.com" <elizabeth.sager@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Your Approval is Overdue: Access Request for steve.hall@enron.com

This request has been pending your approval for  4 days.  Please click
http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000037746&Page=
Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000037746
Request Create Date : 5/30/01 11:37:32 AM
Requested For       : steve.hall@enron.com
Resource Name       : VPN/IPASS
Resource Type       : Applications


Susan -

I put together a short write-up and would like to submit to HR for your mid-year.  Because you've only been here a short time, most of the responses are To Be Determined.

If you don't have any problems, please come by and sign.

Thanks,

Jim


Sheila/Dale,

Ben wants Chris to sign this change order.  I believe it is in essentially
the same form as when I sent it before.  Please advise is there are any
changes you want made.

Thanks,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 10/13/2000 03:03
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kay Mann                           10/13/2000 02:58 PM

To: lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com
cc: michael.storm@ss.ps.ge.com, kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com,
ben.f.jacoby@enron.com, chris.booth@enron.com, Kathleen
Clark/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Re: Revised letter of Sept 29

Lee,

Your changes to the letter look fine to me.

I'm attaching the latest version I have on change order #2.  Are we ready to
go with this one?

We would like to close out #3 and #4 soon.  I believe GE prepared #4.   Could
you send me a copy of the latest draft of #4, as it was inadvertently deleted
from my computer. Meanwhile, I'll work to get you a draft of #3.

Thanks,

Kay

lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com on 10/13/2000 08:03:49 AM
To: kay.mann@enron.com
cc: michael.storm@ss.ps.ge.com, kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com,
ben.f.jacoby@enron.com, chris.booth@enron.com

Subject: Revised letter of Sept 29

 <<SSlttrsept29rev1.doc>>  <<SSlttrsept29rev2.doc>>

Kay,

Attached is a redline version of Sept 29 letter, and clean copy for
sign/send.  The change involves reference to the contract paragraphs that
deal with corrections, enabling Enron and GE to reach agreement on timing of
performance of corrective work, if we both agreed to a schedule other than
prior to delivery to site.  We recognize that if any of this work has an
impact on your EPC contractor's site work schedule, there maybe other
consequences/remedies, as provided in the contract.

I'll sign and fax.  Hope you all have no objections.

Thanks,

Lee

 - SSlttrsept29rev1.doc
 - SSlttrsept29rev2.doc


Dan Watkiss argues that FERC has no authority to override the state, even
though the rules go far beyond what is critical or necessary.

Per Christi's thoughts, we may want to gauge Congressional interest in
pushing something as an add-on to EPAct '92 that allows only safety / public
interest reasons for an EWG to be restricted in its siting by a State.

Jim

---------------------- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 04/19/2001
06:58 PM ---------------------------
From: Christi L Nicolay@ECT on 04/19/2001 09:10 AM
To: Marchris Robinson/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: FLORIDA Matters

I talked with Dan briefly about this to verify my conclusion that FERC would
not get involved at this point.  The Florida issue seems similar to
California (or any other state that has idiosyncratic siting issues) in that
FERC has encouraged California to speed the siting of generation, but has not
ordered it.  What I am not sure about is whether the possible DOE or
Congressional emergency electricity legislation that Jim sent out yesterday
(on demand side management payments) could also include language that would
allow the federal government to override the certain state generation siting
issues, such as the Florida law.
---------------------- Forwarded by Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT on 04/19/2001
08:59 AM ---------------------------

"Dan Watkiss" <dwatkiss@bracepatt.com> on 04/19/2001 08:15:45 AM
To: <Christi.L.Nicolay@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Re: FLORIDA Matters

Christi, the Florida certificate process controls siting and licensing of
generators.  Both are topics over which FERC has no authority.
Consequently, FERC would have no authority to override the state.

>>> <Christi.L.Nicolay@enron.com> 04/18/01 05:45PM >>>

---------------------- Forwarded by Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT on 04/18/2001
04:45 PM ---------------------------

From: Marchris Robinson@ENRON on 04/18/2001 09:58 AM

To:   Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject:  FLORIDA Matters

Christi:

Does FERC have the authority to act per question no. 2?  Please advise.

MR
----- Forwarded by Marchris Robinson/NA/Enron on 04/18/2001 09:57 AM -----

                    James D
                    Steffes              To:     Marchris
Robinson/NA/Enron@Enron
                                         cc:     Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Steve Montovano/NA/Enron@Enron,
                    04/18/2001           Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron,
Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT
                    09:47 AM             Subject:     FLORIDA Matters

Marchris --

Some things on follow-up from Ken Lay's call with Jeb Bush (could you have
answers by End of Week) -

1.   What is the process post the FL Supreme Court decision.  Did anyone
appeal to the Federal Courts?  Outcome of that action, if taken?

2.   Is it possible for the FERC to simply act to waive the CCN need?  Did
we ever discuss with FERC counsel the ability for that agency to "override"
the CCN for any filing EWG?  What would they need to do?  Would FERC need
to take on the FPSC or Fla Supreme Court?  A state should have the right to
worry about safety and reliability, but not interfere with wholesale
competition.

3.   Have we calculated a "back of the envelope" $ value for the margin the
Utilities (FPL, TECO, FPC) will obtain by transferring generation at book?
I would think that nuke should be at book (this is a gimme) with the fossil
analyzed as the difference between average book ($/kw) and market value
($/kw - see Ben Jacoby).  What is the total $?

My understanding is that Steve Kean is heading into Florida to meet with
Sect of Environment next week.  We need to try and get a read from the
Utilities on how much $ would they be willing to give back in rate
decreases as a Generation Stranded Benefit to see this deal through before
the meeting.

Thanks,

Jim


Gang:

Here are my first impressions.  I haven't had time to run a lot of numbers
yet.  I will try and get you more on Thursday or Friday.

Mark, I will try and fax you the case tomorrow.

Dylan

 - TimeWarner.doc


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT on 06/23/2000
11:45 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Michael Walters                           06/21/2000 04:17 PM

To: Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul T Lucci/DEN/ECT@Enron
cc: Tara Sweitzer/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: FT-Denver book on EOL

Phil or Paul:

Please forward this note to Torrey Moorer or Tara Sweitzer in the EOL
department.  It must be sent by you.

Per this request, we are asking that all financial deals on EOL be bridged
over to the FT-Denver book instead of the physical ENA IM-Denver book.

Thanks in advance.

Mick Walters
3-4783
EB3299d


Sara and Mary:
Here are some dates in the next 2 weeks that work for me for lunch:

Next week - Monday, Wednesday and Friday
Week of November 13th - Monday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday

Let me know what works for you.  Look forward to hearing from you.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com


Register/Subscribe <http://www.businessweek.com/register.htm>
Home <http://www.businessweek.com/index.html>
	Get your PeopleSoft 8 CRM Info Kit Today.

PeopleSoft 8 CRM is the ONLY internet solution that takes your customer
relationship management to a new level. Integrate your customer-facing
activities with your critical business applications and manage your
customer life cycle -- from prospect to profit. To receive your free
PeopleSoft 8 CRM Information Kit and Demo CD, visit
www.peoplesoft.com/go/crminfokit9 <http://newsletters.businessweek.com/GoNow/a14109a46672a62891961a1> today.

       Search
 THE SITE  BW Magazine  Daily Briefing  e.biz  Small Business  B-Schools  ----------------  Past Issues ->  Advanced Search ->
 <http://www.businessweek.com/index.html>
  <http://www.businessweek.com/common_images/bw_channels.gif>
  <http://www.businessweek.com/common_images/bw_1x1.gif>	FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 16, 2001
CONTENTS

Cover Stories
Daily Briefing
Investing
Global Business
Technology
Small Biz
B-Schools
Careers

  <http://www.businessweek.com/common_images/bw_cha3.gif>
	  <http://www.businessweek.com/common_images/bw_1x1.gif>	  <http://www.businessweek.com/common_images/ne_insider.gif>

  <http://www.businessweek.com/common_images/bw_1x1.gif>	 This Week <http://www.businessweek.com/common_images/bw_thisweek.gif>

 November 26 Table of Contents  <http://www.businessweek.com/contents.htm>

COVER STORY
*CONFUSED ABOUT EARNINGS? <http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/01_48/b3759001.htm?c=bwinsidernov16&n=link1&t=email>
There are no rules for calculating operating earnings--the number investors watch--as there are for net profits, which are filed with the SEC. So companies are making up their own rules about what to add and what to leave out, and calling the result "earnings." That makes it impossible for investors to compare companies and threatens the credibility of the U.S. financial system. Here's what should be done--and what investors need to know.

*Available to all readers <http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/01_48/b3759001.htm?c=bwinsidernov16&n=link1&t=email> after Monday,
November 19

SPECIAL REPORT
THE INFO TECH 100* <http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/toc/01_48/B3759it100_2.htm?c=bwinsidernov16&n=link2&t=email>
In the past six months, the stocks of four-fifths of the BusinessWeek Info Tech 100 declined in value. But a few still shine despite tough times.

Available to all readers <http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/toc/01_48/B3759it100_2.htm?c=bwinsidernov16&n=link2&t=email>

Plus:
INTERACTIVE SCOREBOARD** <http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/toc/01_48/B3759it100_2.htm?c=bwinsidernov16&n=link3&t=email>
Expanded online to include the 200 best IT companies, with a wealth of financial data

**This, plus many more stories in this Special Report, are available for all readers on Thursday night, Nov. 15

THE CORPORATION:
*ALL EYES ON THE ENRON PRIZE <http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/01_48/b3759104.htm?c=bwinsidernov16&n=link4&t=email>
Dynegy's deal for the troubled power company could yield billions

Available to all readers <http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/01_48/b3759104.htm?c=bwinsidernov16&n=link4&t=email> after Monday,
November 19

  <http://www.businessweek.com/common_images/bw_rule.gif>
**Remember, only subscribers can see the entire issue. Selected stories are available to nonsubscribers on Monday. Want to become a subscriber? It's so easy, all you have to do to get started is go to <http://www.businessweek.com/register.htm?c=bwinsidernov16&n=link5&t=email>

  <http://www.businessweek.com/common_images/bw_rule.gif>
SEARCH PAST ISSUES OF BW
Free for subscribers only <http://www.businessweek.com/search/index.html?c=bwinsidernov16&n=link6&t=email> -- FIVE YEARS of Business Week magazine.

  <http://www.businessweek.com/common_images/bw_rule.gif>
BONUS: THE BW 50
The 50 best companies <http://www.businessweek.com/bw50/?c=bwinsidernov16&n=link7&t=email> in the S&P 500. Plus: In-depth info on all 500,
extra stories, interactive scoreboards, videos, tools, and more --

  <http://www.businessweek.com/common_images/bw_rule.gif>
Here are BW Online highlights from this week:

DAILY BRIEFING

11/15 -- NEWS ANALYSIS
JDS Uniphase: Ready for an Encore? <http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/nov2001/nf20011115_9858.htm?c=bwinsidernov16&n=link9&t=email>
As the curtain descends on a dismal year, some investors see the leader in optical telecom equipment as a star with comeback potential

11/15 -- NEWSMAKER Q&A
JDS's Straus: Banking on Broadband <http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/nov2001/nf20011115_4626.htm?c=bwinsidernov16&n=link10&t=email>
Says the CEO about high-speed access: "Applications and business models that allow somebody to make money will bring growth"

11/15 -- STREET WISE
Suddenly, a Chillier Season for Oil Shares <http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/nov2001/nf20011115_1868.htm?c=bwinsidernov16&n=link11&t=email>
Turmoil over production quotas could keep supplies high. Good news for consumers -- and maybe even for investors, of the long-term variety

11/15 -- NEWS ANALYSIS
A Hard Slog for Financial "Special Forces" <http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/nov2001/nf20011115_1679.htm?c=bwinsidernov16&n=link12&t=email>
Treasury's money warriors are fighting an uphill battle as they target the clandestine conduits that funnel cash to terrorists

11/14 -- INSIDE WALL STREET ONLINE
Holiday Bargain-Hunting on the Street <http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/nov2001/nf20011113_2386.htm?c=bwinsidernov16&n=link12&t=email>
It's that time of year when one investor's loser is another's steal. Here are some big names that could become stocking stuffers

  <http://www.businessweek.com/common_images/bw_rule.gif>

SPEND SOME QUALITY TIME WITH YOUR MONEY
Watch BusinessWeek TV <http://www.businessweek.com/bwtv/?c=bwinsidernov16&n=link14&t=email>, a weekly personal finance
program that follows money from Wall Street to
Main Street: Making it, investing it, and even
spending it.
Check your local listings for station and exact time.

  <http://www.businessweek.com/common_images/bw_rule.gif>
INVESTING

11/15 -- MARKET SNAPSHOT
Blue Chips Pocket Gains <http://www.businessweek.com/investor/content/nov2001/pi20011115_8908.htm?c=bwinsidernov16&n=link16&t=email>
Hope for an economic recovery in 2002 continues to buoy stocks, but ugly news from Dell and Yahoo may stall performance Friday

11/15 -- FUND Q&A
High Quality Munis Bring Solid Returns <http://www.businessweek.com/investor/content/nov2001/pi20011115_3407.htm?c=bwinsidernov16&n=link17&t=email>
Christine Thompson has outperformed her peers by making smart bets in the hospital and health care sectors and concentrating on high quality issues

11/12 -- ASK THE ANALYST
Fund Selections <http://www.businessweek.com/mediacenter/list/ask01.htm?/mediacenter/ram/asktheanalyst/pedwards110901.htm?c=bwinsidernov16&n=link18&t=email>
S&P's Phil Edwards answers your questions on bond funds. Can they continue their winning streak?

  <http://www.businessweek.com/common_images/bw_rule.gif>
GLOBAL BUSINESS

INTERNATIONAL -- EUROPE'S FUTURE
Germany's Challenge <http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/01_47/b3758601.htm?c=bwinsidernov16&n=link21&t=email>
Can Europe's top economy lead the Continent to reform?

11/12 -- ONLINE ASIA
Not So Fab for a Singapore Chipmaker <http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/nov2001/nf20011112_2873.htm?c=bwinsidernov16&n=link22&t=email>
Chartered Semiconductor CFO Chia Song Hwee gamely maintains that hard times and ferocious competition haven't changed its game plan

  <http://www.businessweek.com/common_images/bw_rule.gif>
TECHNOLOGY

11/19 -- TECHNOLOGY & YOU
A Light Laptop That's Fully Loaded <http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/01_47/b3758029.htm?c=bwinsidernov16&n=link27&t=email>
Toshiba's Port?g? 4000 may be the first compact notebook that doesn't skimp on features
11/15 -- PRIVACY MATTERS
Face It, Face-Cams Are Here to Stay <http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/nov2001/nf20011115_3919.htm?c=bwinsidernov16&n=link25&t=email>
Rather than trying to prevent their adoption, privacy advocates would be better served trying to define restrictive guidelines on their use

11/14 -- BYTE OF THE APPLE
Office X: The Best and Worst of Microsoft <http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/nov2001/nf20011114_5582.htm?c=bwinsidernov16&n=link26&t=email>
The OS X version of Office is a ringing endorsement of the Mac. Too bad it breaks no new ground and costs so much

Plus, you'll find daily coverage of the rapidly changing world of e-business at <http://www.ebiz.businessweek.com?c=bwinsidernov16&n=link28&t=email> BW e.biz offers exclusive analysis, commentary, and Web-site reviews every day. Visit often!

UPCOMING CONFERENCES: <http://www.ebiz.businessweek.com?c=bwinsidernov16&n=link33&t=email>
BusinessWeek in partnership with Hewlett-Packard presents:
The Sixth Annual BusinessWeek Conference on the Digital Economy,
New Priorities: Building a Collaborative Enterprise in Uncertain Times
December 6-7, 2001
The Fairmont Hotel, San Francisco, California

We are pleased to announce our keynote speakers are:

Jack Welch <http://www.businessweek.com/insider/jwelch.htm>, Former Chairman and CEO of General Electric Company and
The Honorable James A. Baker, III, Former U.S. Secretary of State (1989-1992)
and Former U.S. Secretary of the Treasury (1985-1988)

In light of recent events in New York and Washington D.C., the
conference will feature a special session on Digital Security:
Job #1 in Threatening Times.
Raymond Kelly, Former NYPD Commissioner; Senior Managing Director,
Global Security, Bear Stearns will head up the panel

Additional Speakers include:

Michael Aguilar	  	 President and COO	  	 Panasonic Company National
Marc Andreessen	  	 Chairman and Cofounder	  	 Loudcloud
Bill Bass	  	 SVP, E-Commerce and International	  	 Lands' End, Inc.
Joseph Baylock	  	 Group Vice President	  	 Gartner, Inc.
Daeje Chin	  	 President and CEO, Digital Media System Business	  	 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
Bruce Chizen	  	 President and CEO	  	 Adobe
Eric K. Clemons	  	 Professor of Information, Strategy, and Economics	  	 The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania
Lisa J. Colnett	  	 SVP, Worldwide Process Management and CIO	  	 Celestica Inc.
Craig Conway	  	 President and CEO	  	 PeopleSoft, Inc.
Richard A. DeMillo	  	 Vice President and CTO	  	 Hewlett-Packard Company
James Hamilton	  	 President	  	 Efficient Networks Inc. (a subsidiary of Siemens ICN)
James E. Heppleman	  	 CTO and EVP	  	 Software Products, PTC
Konrad Hilbers	  	 CEO	  	 Napster, Inc.
David House	  	 President, CEO, and Chairman	  	 Allegro Networks.
John Jordan	  	 Principal	  	 Cap Gemini Ernst & Young
Raymond C. Kurzweil	  	 Author	  	 The Age of Spiritual Machines
David O. Leemon	  	 EVP and CSO	  	 Charles Schwab Corporation
Elias Levy	  	 Co-Founder and CTO	  	 Security Focus
Webb McKinney	  	 Business Customer Organization President	  	 and HP-Compaq Merger Integration Manager	  	 Hewlett-Packard Co.
Mike Micucci	  	 Vice President, Solutions Strategy	  	 Commerce One
Lars Nyberg	  	 Chairman and CEO	  	 NCR Corporation
Robert W. Shaner	  	 President, Wireless Operations	  	 Cingular Wireless
Pradeep Sindhu	  	 Vice Chairman and CTO	  	 Juniper Networks, Inc.
Carl Yankowski	  	 CEO	  	 Palm, Inc.

Special Dinner Entertainment by Martin Short and ?The Second City? Comedy Improv Group

For a complete listing of speakers, full program details or to register go to
<http://www.conferences.businessweek.com/2001/digital2001/?c=bwinsidernov16&n=link29&t=email>

  <http://www.businessweek.com/common_images/bw_rule.gif>
SMALL BUSINESS ONLINE

11/19 -- FINANCE
Insurance: The Coverage Crunch <http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/01_47/b3758098.htm?c=bwinsidernov16&n=link31&t=email>
Providers are spreading premium hikes far and wide. That could doom some small companies

11/12 -- SMART ANSWERS
Networking's Human Connection <http://www.businessweek.com/smallbiz/content/nov2001/sb20011112_0590.htm?c=bwinsidernov16&n=link32&t=email>
To build a list of business contacts, do the research, compose the pitches, make the lunch dates -- and then listen

11/5 -- VENTURE CAPITAL
VCs Remain in Low Gear <http://www.businessweek.com/smallbiz/content/nov2001/sb20011112_1130.htm?c=bwinsidernov16&n=link33&t=email>
Downturns usually mean opportunities, but depressed tech spending and a sluggish market are keeping venture capitalists on the sidelines

FORUMS
Small Business Forum <http://www.businessweek.com/smallbiz/content/oct2001/sb20011012_810.htm?c=bwinsidernov16&n=link35&t=email>
Join the discussion? A reader outlines how factoring your receivables can be a great way to increase cash flow. What do you think? Check out the Financing Your Business folder

  <http://www.businessweek.com/common_images/bw_rule.gif>
B-SCHOOLS

11/15 -- MBA JOURNALS
Learning in the Real World Classroom <http://www.businessweek.com/bschools/mbajournal/index.htm?c=bwinsidernov16&n=link37&t=email>
If you want to know what business school is like, whom better to ask than MBA students?

CAREER MOVES
EMBA Profiles & Rankings <http://www.businessweek.com/bschools/01/emba_rank.htm?c=bwinsidernov16&n=link39&t=email>
BusinessWeek's first Executive MBA rankings in a decade grade 35 programs worldwide. The 2001 rankings are based on surveys of over 3,000 graduates of 82 B-schools, as well as a poll of EMBA directors at those 82 schools. Scan 161 profiles of EMBA programs to determine which is right for you

B-SCHOOL CALENDAR
BusinessWeek Online's New Tool <http://bwnt.businessweek.com/calendar/?c=bwinsidernov16&n=link40&t=email> will give you an idea of upcoming events at B-schools in the U.S. and around the world

MBA JOURNALS
Preparing for B-School <http://www.businessweek.com/bschools/mbajournal/index.htm?c=bwinsidernov16&n=link41&t=email>
In this new series, 11 first-year students discuss the B-school orientation process

B-SCHOOL FORUMS
Join Today! <http://forums.businessweek.com/bw-bschools/start?c=bwinsidernov16&n=link42&t=email>
Visit BW Online's interactive forums for wide-ranging discussions about management education. Search through OVER 228,000 POSTS for topics that interest you

  <http://www.businessweek.com/common_images/bw_rule.gif>
CAREERS

11/15 -- PAY & PERKS
The CEO Gravy Train Just Got Derailed  <http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/01_47/b3758095.htm?c=bwinsidernov16&n=link44&t=email>
Sorry, chiefs--"pay for performance" is back in vogue

11/08 -- ASK CAREERS
The Gift of Tongues Keeps on Giving <http://www.businessweek.com/careers/content/nov2001/ca2001118_3934.htm?c=bwinsidernov16&n=link45&t=email>
Fluency in a second language commands a premium on the job market. How one goes about acquiring it depends on what best suits the individual

ASK CAREERS
Have a question about your career or workplace issues? E-mail us at: askcareers@businessweek.com <mailto:askcareers@businessweek.com?c=bwinsidernov16&n=link53&t=email>
Please include your real name and phone number in case we need more information. If we answer your question, only your initials and city will be printed.

  <http://www.businessweek.com/common_images/bw_rule.gif>
SEARCH BUSINESSWEEK.COM

Search our ENTIRE SITE <http://www.businessweek.com/search/index.html?c=bwinsidernov16&n=link54&t=email> for all free content, including Daily Briefing, BW e.biz, Small Business, and the Best B-Schools. You'll find our search function in the light-blue bar at the top of nearly every screen on the site

See you online,
Joleen M. Colpa
BW Online

  <http://www.businessweek.com/common_images/bw_rule.gif>

The Insider Newsletter is a FREE service provided by BusinessWeek Online.
If you've received this message in error or if you would like to change or cancel your newsletter subscription, please go to our Click here to change or remove your subscription. <http://newsletters.businessweek.com/Change-Remove/a14109a62891961a2a46672>   <http://newsletters.businessweek.com/Sense-HTML/a14109a62891961a46672>page.
If you need other assistance, please contact Customer Service <http://www.businessweek.com/custserv/contactserv.htm?c=bwinsidernov16&n=link47&t=email>.
  <http://www.businessweek.com/common_images/bw_1x1.gif>
  <http://www.businessweek.com/common_images/bw_1x1.gif>

  <http://www.businessweek.com/common_images/bw_1x1.gif>	  <http://www.businessweek.com/common_images/bw_1x1.gif>
	  <http://www.businessweek.com/common_images/bw_1x1.gif>

 Get 4 Free Issues of BusinessWeek Magazine <http://www.businessweek.com/common_images/offers/bw_suboffer.gif>
Fill in this form to receive your four free issues:

Name:

  <http://www.businessweek.com/common_images/bw_1x1.gif>
E-Mail Address:

  <http://www.businessweek.com/common_images/bw_1x1.gif>
Street Address:

  <http://www.businessweek.com/common_images/bw_1x1.gif>
City:

  <http://www.businessweek.com/common_images/bw_1x1.gif>
State:
	 Zip:

Country:

  <http://www.businessweek.com/common_images/bw_rule.gif>
  <http://www.businessweek.com/common_images/bw_mcgrawhilllogo.gif>Copyright 2001, by The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use <http://www.businessweek.com/cgi-bin/redirect?url=%2Fcopyrt.htm> | Privacy Policy <http://www.businessweek.com/cgi-bin/redirect?url=%2Fprivacy.htm>


Pat,

As we discussed this morning, I need your help in getting copies of EES agreements related to retail efforts behind several NY LDC's.  The LDC's in question are Niagara Mohawk (aka NiMo), NYSEG (aka New York State Gas & Electric), and Rochester Gas & Electric (aka RG&E).  The agreements I am looking for are the master contracts that EES may have signed with the LDC's that addressed the release of upstream transportation and storage capacity with interstate pipelines (e.g. Dominion, Columbia Gas, Tennessee, etc.), operational balancing agreements that covered swing supplies, and the transfer of existing LDC storage volumes on the upstream pipelines.

We are using this information to get ready for a Bankruptcy Court Hearing that is coming up in a couple of weeks.

Thanks for moving this one to the top of the list,

Ruth
713-853-1667


Regarding the guaranties, I am confused on the amount you want me to write for Corp. $30 or 20? Please let me know. Thanks!

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Legal
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
Debra.Perlingiere@enron.com
713-853-7658
713-646-3490 Fax


The Approval status has changed on the following report:

Status last changed by: Barry L. Tycholiz
Expense Report Name: 121001
Report Total: $198.98
Amount Due Employee: $198.98
Amount Approved: $198.98
Amount Paid: $0.00
Approval Status: Approved
Payment Status: Pending

To review this expense report, click on the following link for Concur Expense.
http://expensexms.enron.com


Did you guys ever touch base with Cindy Ma?

I can't answer Ernst & Young questions without knowing what transpired last night.

Thanks.

Happy Holidays.

Sara Shackleton
Enron Wholesale Services
1400 Smith Street, EB3801a
Houston, TX  77002
Ph:  (713) 853-5620
Fax: (713) 646-3490


Thanks Sheila. Chaps, FYI:

******************************************************************************
******************************************************************************
******************************************

Here are key dates for equity grants and release dates for various long-term
payouts:

Restricted Stock grant release from 1999 ENELTIP (struck Jan 2000) grant
  January 11  Comp Committee approves release of grant, pending outcome of
earnings (anticipated to be 100% release) and value based on
    closing price on January 11.  Shares released to PaineWebber immediately
(all participants have received a notice on this already).

ECT LTCP payout of phantom stock units (20% of 1997 awards and 60% of 1998
awards)
  January 23 Payouts approved by Comp Committee
  January 24 Value determined based on closing price of stock
  February 6 Checks and Letters issued to participants

2000 LTI, KEYSOP and Bonus Deferral -
   January 23 Grant date for Executive LTI, KEYSOP and bonus deferral grants
(also date for bonus approv
   February ?? Grant documents to participants anticipated to be out mid-late
February.

Hope this helps

Sheila


David-
Two files are attached. The first file is the text and figures of a plan for
characterizing impacted soil in the former surface impoundment areas. The
second file contains the attachments to the characterization plan. The
attachments include copies of soil boring logs and a summary of some previous
soil sample results. I will also send a hard copy of the plan to you via
FedEx. Transwestern is ready to proceed upon approval from the NMOCD and the
NMED HRMB. Please call me if you have any questions or comments.
Thanks,
George

George C. Robinson, PE
Contract Environmental Engineer
Cypress Engineering
ENRON Office: (713) 646-7327
ENRON email: george.robinson@enron.com


The report named: VaR and Off-Peak Position Report By Trader <http://erv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=23&report_name=VaR+and+Off-Peak+Position+Report+By+Trader&category_cd=5&category_name=EAST&toc_hide=1&sTV1=5&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=10/24/2001>, published as of 10/24/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.

(Revision: 2)


This is fantastic, Vince.  Thank you so much.  It sounds like you are going to a lot of trouble.  I do appreciate it - I believe the research topic is an interesting one.  I will be in the office for a good part of the day today - 713-348-5384  otherwise, home is 713-662-3733
Hope you were able to get a nice break over the holidays and enjoy time with your wife and son.
bbo
At 05:41 PM 12/23/2001 -0500, you wrote:
Barbara,
I shall be back in the office on Wednesday and will call you to talk about the data. Some time series are in public domain and I hope we shall be able to give you this information without facing any problems. The data we buy from vendors, will require a formal release. I hope the vendors will allow us to do this but we shall need a formal letter from you saying that you will use the data for research only. Finally, the release of compilation of the OTC prices will require an approval from the trading desks. The traders tend to be difficult sometimes.
What is the best number to reach you on Wednesday?
Best Holiday Wishes to you and your Family.
Vince


AMEREX WEST
Bob Badeer

I am missing the following deals:

1)  Sell  Sempra Energy Trading Corp.  100  NP 15  1/1/02- 3/31/02 50mw
off     0.0075  fee
2)  Buy  Enron Energy Services, Inc.  99.95  NP 15  1/1/02- 3/31/02 50mw
off      0.00  fee

BLOOMBERG
All deals checked out fine.

PREBON WEST
All deals checked out fine.


IntercontinentalExchange
                                                                                Firm Power Price Bulletin
                                                                                For Power Delivered on Wednesday, October   03, 2001
                                                                                (Trade Date of Tuesday, October   02, 2001)
Click here to access index history .
                                                                                * volume represents sell-side only *

Hub	High	Low	Wtd Avg Index	Change ($)	Vol (Mwh)
Cinergy	         $23.00	         $18.00	         $21.65	-   1.23	         154,400
Comed	         $21.00	         $19.00	         $20.46	-   1.06	          28,000
Entergy	         $18.00	         $15.75	         $17.09	-    .96	          16,000
Nepool	         $38.00	         $35.75	         $36.71	+    .21	          10,400
PJM-West	         $28.30	         $27.75	         $28.08	+   1.86	          36,800
SP-15	         $26.25	         $25.00	         $25.82	-   2.62	           4,800
TVA	         $20.50	         $19.25	         $20.13	-    .62	          11,200

                                                                                Includes all trades done from 6 AM to 11 AM Central Prevailing Time on the trade date specified for financially firm power delivered during the on-peak hours (6 AM - 10 PM CPT for Eastern hubs / 6 AM - 10 PM Pacific Prevailing Time for Western hubs) on the delivery date(s) specified.
                                                                                IntercontinentalExchange is the world's most liquid trading platform for over-the-counter energy and metals.  Active markets include North American power and natural gas, global crude and refined oil products, and precious metals.  Traded instruments include forwards, swaps, and options.
To become an Exchange Participant or inquire about the indices, please contact sales@intcx.com .
This information is sent to you free of charge and may be redistributed in its entirety.  Republishing in any other form is prohibited.
If this was forwarded by a friend and you would like to receive your own daily bulletin, click here to subscribe .
To unsubscribe from this service, click here unsubscribe .
                                                                                ?Copyright IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. 2001, All Rights Reserved.


Please set up the following CES contract with ENA as agent

Pipeline CGAS
Firmness IT
Rate Sched IT
Type  Transportation
Term  1/1/2000 - 1/31/2000 evergreen
k#  38295

Thanks


Oh, What a Web We Weave:
Understanding the Opportunities and Hazards of Globalization

Globalization is one of the strongest forces shaping our future.  During this
session, we'll take a look at the opportunities and hazards of globalization,
and consider how they may shape the future-
For Our Country, Our Company and Ourselves.

Friday, March 30
11:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.
EB 5C2

Speaker:
Amy Oberg
Manager, Competitive Intelligence and Future Foresight
Enron Energy Services

To Make a Reservation, Call 3-1941 and Select Option 1

Please inform us ahead of time if you need special accommodations to
participate in this meeting.  Call 3-9390

Lunch will not be provided, but you are welcome to bring your own.


Attached are the 58 questions prepared by GPC in anticipation of a public
release on Project Stanley.  The answers have been compiled by numerous
individuals, including Aleck, Rob, Kevin Wellenius and me.  Please review,
make changes and return to me at your earliest convenience.  I will compile
everyone's corrections, additions, etc. and prepare a revised document.
Thanks.

If you have any questions, call me at ext. 3-9053.

Eric


i got your message but i need to work

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	val.generes@accenture.com@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-val+2Egeneres+40accenture+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Thursday, May 24, 2001 1:05 PM
To:	brian.r.vassigh@accenture.com; pjmccabe24@hotmail.com; Lenhart, Matthew; leemac007@yahoo.com; mmmarcantel@equiva.com; SoCalCinephile@socal.rr.com
Subject:	FW: Math Exam

Alex - Your kids will take this if you don't leave SoCal....

 CITY OF LOS ANGELES HIGH SCHOOL MATH PROFICIENCY
 EXAM

 Name:_______________________________
 Gang:___________________________

1. Johnny has an AK-47 with an 80-round clip. If he
 misses 6 out of 10 shots
 and shoots 13 times at each drive-by shooting, how
 many drive-by shootings
 can he attempt before he has to reload?

2. Jose has 2 ounces of cocaine and he sells an
 8-ball to Jackson for $320
 and 2 grams to Billy for $85 per gram. What is the
 street value of the
 balance of the cocaine if he doesn't cut it?

3. Rufus is pimping for three girls. If the price is
 $65 for each trick, how
 many tricks will each girl have to turn so Rufus can
 pay for his
 $800-per-day crack habit?

4. Jarone want to cut his 1/2 pound of heroin to
 make 20% more profit. How
 many ounces of cut will he need?

5. Willie gets $200 for stealing a BMW, $50 for a
 Chevy, and $100 for a 4X4.
 If he has stolen 2 BMWs, 3 4X4s, how many Chevies
 will he have to steal to
 make $800?

6. Raoul is in prison for 6 years for murder. He got
 $10,000 for the hit. If
 his common law wife is spending $100 per month, how
 much money will be left
 when he gets out of prison and how many years will
 he get for killing the
 bitch that spent his money?

7. If the average spray can covers 22 square feet
 and the average letter is
 3 square feet, how many letters can a tagger spray
 with 3 cans of paint?

8. Hector knocked up 6 girls in his gang. There are
 27 girls in the gang.
 What percentage of the girls in the gang has Hector
 knocked up?

9. Thelma can cook dinner for her 16 children for
 $7.50 per night. She gets
 $234 a month welfare for each child. If her $325 per
 month rent goes up 15%,
 how many more children should she have to keep up
 with her expenses?

10. Salvador was arrested for dealing crack and his
 bail was set at $25,000.
 If he pays a bail bondsman 12% and returns to
 Mexico, how much money will he
 lose by jumping bail?


Pleas also send the preranking to Susan Wimberley.
---------------------- Forwarded by Gretchen Jennings/OTS/Enron on 11/28/2000
08:35 PM ---------------------------

Gretchen Jennings
11/28/2000 09:32 AM
To: Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Associates PRC 2000 Year end Review

Mark Russ will be representing Michael Ratner at the PRC on 12/12 and 12/13.
I am looking into the pre-ranking meeting that is supposedly going on now.
However, the Associate Analyst program indicated that this was a pre-ranking
for Associates within EBS.  Please provide your feedback and preranking to
Mark before the PRC on 12/12 and 12/13.

Rod Hayslett

11/27/2000 08:28 AM
To: Gretchen Jennings/OTS/Enron@Enron, Gary P Smith/EWC/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Associates PRC 2000 Year end Review

??????    what is she talking about?

---------------------- Forwarded by Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron on 11/27/2000
08:29 AM ---------------------------

Wilma Williams@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
11/27/2000 08:12 AM
To: Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Associates PRC 2000 Year end Review

Rod,

The PRC process closed last week.  You should have received information
regarding representing your associates/analysts at a meeting to be held on
the 28th of this month.  If not, you should check with the Associate/Analysts
or HR for this information.

After the pre-ranking meeting, then you should submit the ranking and your
evaluation to Mark for the final Corporate ranking.

Thanks.

Wilma J. Williams
Enron Broadband Services
Corporate Development
PH:  713-853-6603
EB 4514

	Rod Hayslett@ENRON
	11/27/00 07:14 AM

		 To: Wilma Williams/Enron Communications@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Associates PRC 2000 Year end Review

When is the PRC?

Wilma Williams@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
11/02/2000 02:51 PM
To: Bryan Kite/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Brian Spector/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Kal Shah/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard
Leibert/HOU/EES@EES, Edward D Baughman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kim Godfrey/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Scott Healy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rod
Hayslett/FGT/Enron@Enron, Frank Bay/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
cc:

Subject: Associates PRC 2000 Year end Review

Dear Managers,

Mark J. Russ has been selected for the 2000 year-end review to represent an
associate(s) under your management.   In order to do  this effectively, it
is  important that he receive your feedback and ranking as soon as possible.

If you have any questions, please feel free to call Mark at 3-6602 or myself
at 3-6603.

Thank you in advance for your help.

Wilma J. Williams
Enron Broadband Services
Corporate Development
PH:  713-853-6603
EB 4514


I like it.  Our argument should be that the MISO is not an Indiana public utility.  I'd put it in the dialogue just to keep from having the process work out poorly.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Novosel, Sarah
Sent:	Friday, November 09, 2001 2:08 PM
To:	Steffes, James D.; Migden, Janine; Roan, Michael; Stroup, Kerry; Nicolay, Christi L.
Subject:	RE: FW: Midwest ISO Joint Petitioners' Proposed Settlement Agreement - IURC C...

Janine:

Below is a short response I have drafted if we choose to respond (although it is not clear to me that a response is necessary) to these emails.  I'm a little unclear about the positions of the people in the emails.  I think our best response to Ron (Cinergy) is that MISO does not serve load, so MISO is not accountable to IURC.  Do we agree that MISO is considered an Indiana utility?  If we agree with that statement, are they subject to any IURC oversight?  Even if they are, I don't think it should be because of the "bundled" retail load issue, but rather because IURC has the right to regulate all "public utilities" (perhaps for safety reasons?) within its state.  But if we agree that IURC does have some authority over MISO as an Indiana Public Utility, then we may need to revise the statement below.

I did not go into the issue of whether there will be any "bundled retail load" in Indiana once MISO is operating.  In a prior order, FERC says that all transmission must be under the MISO tariff.  If this is the case, one could argue that the service is no longer "bundled" but I don't think we want to get into that argument with these guys.

Here is some language that I put together.  What does everyone else think?

The MISO is a FERC jurisdictional entity that will provide interstate transmission service throughout its region.  MISO will not serve retail load, nor will it operate the distribution systems that move power to retail customers.  Therefore, we do not believe that MISO is or should be accountable to the IURC.

Responsibility for serving retail customers will remain with the individual entities who are currently responsible for serving those customers.  They will contract for transmission service with the MISO and will have the obligation to serve their retail customers.  It will be these load serving entities who are accountable to the IURC, not MISO.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Steffes, James D.
Sent:	Friday, November 09, 2001 10:28 AM
To:	Migden, Janine; Roan, Michael; Stroup, Kerry; Nicolay, Christi L.; Novosel, Sarah
Subject:	RE: FW: Midwest ISO Joint Petitioners' Proposed Settlement Agreement - IURC C...

I think that Enron is interested supporting your idea.  Let's weigh in with appropriate language that counters the below language -

I think that the state-level parties (and the IURC) have an interest in the
MISO acknowledging that it is an Indiana utility with SOME degree of
accountability re (at least) bundled retail load to the Indiana Commission
and the Indiana parties.

Please work with Sarah N. to create a reasonable response and our key arguments.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Migden, Janine
Sent:	Friday, November 09, 2001 9:19 AM
To:	Roan, Michael; Stroup, Kerry; Steffes, James D.; Nicolay, Christi L.
Subject:	FW: FW: Midwest ISO Joint Petitioners' Proposed Settlement Agreement - IURC C...

Citizens Action has been going back and forth with Cinergy on the jurisdictional question and the right for the IURC to reinsert itself after approval of transfer, ie rights of review down the road.  At this point, I have stayed out of the email traffic, but we could weigh in supporting the concept that MISO is FERC jurisdictional.  See below.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	MullettCAC@aol.com@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, November 08, 2001 5:40 PM
To:	Ron.Brothers@cinergy.com
Cc:	mork@ucclan.state.in.us; jlyle@mullettlaw.com; tstewart@lewis-kappes.com; jmigden@enron.com
Subject:	Re: FW: Midwest ISO Joint Petitioners' Proposed Settlement Agreement - IURC C...

Ron:

    It seems to me that the IURC cannot approve transfer of operational
control to an RTO which does not have FERC approval, but it also seems to me
that the IURC is not required to approve transfer of operational control to
an RTO which does have FERC approval.  In other words, come December 15, or
January 1, or January 15, we could have Indiana utilities still being
operated in accordance with their own Open Access Tariffs just as they are
today.  Do you agree or disagree with that proposition?

    If my proposition is correct, then the issue becomes whether the proposed
transfer of operational control to MISO meets the requirements of Section 83,
i.e. a "public interest" standard.

    As you know, I think that MISO has done a creditable (although by no
means perfect) job in considering and balancing the interests of affected
parties and has a meaningful stakeholder input process.     So, I think that
it would be a mistake for Indiana parties to try and "load up" the IURC
approval process with a lot of party-specific "Christmas tree ornaments."

    By the same token, I am quite concerned about a "rubber stamp" approach
to IURC review.  I think that the state-level parties (and the IURC) have a
significant interest in the transfer being for a term of years which does not
exceed five.  I think the State should retain the ability to withdraw its
approval of the transfer of operational control and investigate the effects
of MISO operation on Indiana retail load.  I think that the state-level
parties (and the IURC) have an interest in defining the goals or standards
for MISO performance during the initial transfer period, based on which an
extension of the authorization would subsequently be granted or denied.  I
think that the state-level parties (and the IURC) have an interest in the
MISO acknowledging that it is an Indiana utility with SOME degree of
accountability re (at least) bundled retail load to the Indiana Commission
and the Indiana parties.   And, I do not see those interests being recognized
or accommodated very much, if at all, in your settlement proposal.  Do you
disagree?  If so, tell me how you see those interests addressed in your
proposal.

    I want to hear what others say, but as matters stand my inclination would
be to pursue these issues in the hearing, brief them, and then let the
Commission decide.  Do you think that this approach would delay the IURC
decisional process enough to make a difference? If so, how much delay with
what effect?

    Thanks.

                                                        Mike

Michael A. Mullett
Mullett & Associates
309 West Washington Street, Suite 233
Indianapolis, IN 46204
Phone: (317) 636-5165
Fax:  (317) 636-5435
E-mail:  mullettcac@aol.com


This is so funny but read the text first.
----- Forwarded by Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT on 05/18/2001 09:26 AM -----

	Mary J Heinitz
	05/18/2001 08:53 AM

		 To: dehein1@earthlink.net
		 cc: (bcc: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT)
		 Subject: Didn't Think Ahead

Read the text before looking at the picture.

A class of elementary students started a class project to
make a planter to take home and wanted to have a plant in
it that was easy to take care of, so it was decided to use
cactus plants. The students were given greenware pottery
of a clown planter, and they painted them with glaze and
had them professionally fired at a class outing so they
could see the process. It was  great fun.

They planted the cactus seeds in the finished planters, and
they grew nicely but unfortunately the children were not
allowed to take them home.

The cactus plants were removed and a small ivy replaced
them, and the children were then allowed to take the
planters home.

The teacher said cactus seemed like a good idea at the time....

(See attached file: pic27350.jpg)

 - pic27350.jpg


I'm happy to go with Bill and lift the drains on this if you think it necesssary.
DP