Unsubscribe/address change links are at bottom.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Want to help?  Forward this e-mail to your friends, then, if you
have not yet given, contribute to the Bush Cheney Recount here:
https://www.econtributor.net/Contribution/Contribution.cfm?AID=IVFFBXFAZHGH

AOL contribution link at bottom.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Bush News
11/22/00
http://www.georgewbush.com
AOL: GeorgeWBush.com

Contents:
1  Statement by Governor George W. Bush
2  Statement by James Baker III re: FL Supreme Court Decision
3  Gore Has No Chance To Win Unless He Changes The Rules Again...
4  Washington Post: Send in the Thugs
5  Gore's Point Man Argued Against Dimples in 1996

_________________________________________________________________

1
Statement by Governor George W. Bush
November 22, 2000

"I am disappointed with last night's ruling by the Florida Supreme Court.  We
believe the justices have used the bench to change Florida's election laws
and usurp the authority of Florida's election officials.  We believe the
court overreached. Writing laws is the duty of the legislature; administering
laws is the duty of the executive branch.

"Two weeks after the presidential election, a court has decided that
Florida's deadline for counting votes and certifying votes was not a
deadline at all. The court has decided that the selective recounting of votes
that have already been counted at least two times, and in some cases three or
four times, will continue more than a week after the law says it should. And
the court has ordered that the secretary of state must accept all this.

"The court had cloaked its ruling in legalistic language. But make no
mistake, the court rewrote the law. It changed the rules, and it did so after
the election was over.

Full Statement:
http://www.georgewbush.com/News.asp?FormMode=NR&ID=2130

_________________________________________________________________

2
Statement by James Baker III, Senior Advisor, Bush-Cheney Recount

"At Monday's oral argument before the Florida Supreme Court,
Justice Harding asked a key question about Florida's electoral
laws and standards: "Is it right to change the rules in the
middle of the game?"

"The Florida Supreme Court and some Democratic county electoral
boards have now decided to do just that.

Full statement:
http://www.georgewbush.com/News.asp?FormMode=NR&ID=2129

_________________________________________________________________

3
Gore Has No Chance To Win Unless He Changes The Rules Again To Count
Dimpled Ballots, So...

 ~ For the past week, the Gore campaign has been saying that
   the Florida Supreme Court would be the final arbiter of
   this election.  But now that they didn't get a decision
   exactly to their liking, the Gore campaign is backpedaling
   and saying that they will leave all their options open.

 ~ In response to inquiries about whether dimpled chads can be
   counted as votes, the Florida Supreme Court cited the Hartke
   case in Illinois, but the Illinois case didn't talk about
   dimpled chads at all. It involved hanging chads, the
   standard that these three counties began using and the
   standard that they are now seeking to change.

 ~ There has been a lot of talk about statutes in Texas
   governing manual recounts.  In Texas this would all be over
   because Texas only allows one manual recount, and it has
   very clear and objective standards.  The first of those is
   when you see light coming through, and the second of those
   is where you have a hanging chad. It's only in the third
   instance that the statute in Texas speaks about any
   consideration of a dimpled chad, and it doesn't say that a
   dimpled chad can be considered standing alone. It says it
   can be considered only where it also is accompanied by a
   clearly ascertainable intent of the voter to vote.

 ~ With its decision, the Florida Supreme Court has decided
   to 'change the rules in the middle of the game.'

 ~ The Florida Supreme Court has now assumed the role of both
   the executive and legislative branches.  They effectively
   rewrote statutes that had been enacted by the Florida
   Legislature and took over responsibilities that rightly
   belonged to the Florida Secretary of State.

 ~ This decision by seven Democrat justices completely
   politicizes the vote-counting process by putting the fate
   of this election in the hands of the six Democrats, two
   independents and only one Republican that control the
   Canvassing Boards in the counties conducting manual
   recounts.

 ~ In a transparent attempt to overturn the results of this
   election, the Gore campaign is now trying to rewrite the
   rules in three counties that are still conducting manual
   recounts.

 ~ Statistical experts have said that under the current
   standards, Gore will not get enough votes to overcome
   Governor Bush's lead.  So now the Gore campaign is looking
   to change those standards in the middle of the process.

 ~ The Gore campaign wants to count ballots that have only a
   slight indentation.  No hole in the ballot is necessary.
   No single loose corner is necessary.  Not even seeing any
   light through the ballot is necessary.  This lenient
   standard has been proposed solely for Democrats to invent
   enough votes to overturn the election.

 ~ Ten years ago, the Democratic Supervisor of Elections in
   Palm Beach County issued a guideline about how ballots
   should be counted that stated, "But a chad that is fully
   attached, bearing only an indentation, should not be
   counted as a vote."  Now Democrats want to unfairly change
   those rules.

 ~ The Gore campaign knows that the only way to get the votes
   they need is to keep changing the rules.  This is unfair
   and unacceptable.  This election must be decided by the
   rules that existed on Election Day, not the rules
   rewritten by the Gore campaign in a politically charged
   environment two weeks later.

_________________________________________________________________

4
The Washington Post
SEND IN THE THUGS
Michael Kelly
11/22/00

Excerpt:
"Even if Gore ultimately loses in Florida, he will have come
very, very close to winning. Moreover, he will have done this
with his image-skin more or less intact. For Gore has already
won an astonishing propaganda victory: With the help of
reasonably sympathetic coverage from a largely Democratic and
liberal national press corps, he has managed to spin his
extraordinary, radical, unprecedented behavior as reasonable -
and legitimate. This probably ensures that future close
presidential elections will produce future Gore Losers,
marching off to the courts and the cameras with their armies
of lawyers and thugs, demanding recounts, rewriting the rules
and the laws, convincing more and more Americans that their
electoral system is, like those in most of the world, just
another rigged game.

Thanks, Al, we needed that."

Full Story:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A49846-2000Nov21.html

_________________________________________________________________

5
The Palm Beach Post
Gore's Point Man Argued Against Dimples in 1996
Joel Engelhardt, Palm Beach Post
11/22/00

Excerpts:
"Amid the swarm of the world press outside the county Emergency
Operations Center, Dennis Newman leads the charge to find new
votes for Al Gore in the dimples of the Palm Beach County
ballot.

"His argument, put simply, is that dimples show the true intent
of the voter. Voters caused those dimples. Dimples should count.

"Four years ago, in a similar election spat, Newman took a much
different stand. Employing his best legal tactics on behalf of
a Democrat holding a slight lead in a primary race for
Congress, Newman scoffed at the idea of counting the tiny
indentations as votes.

"Like the Republicans watching now, Newman wondered out loud how
ballots that had been handled over and over, in recount after
recount, could still be impartially judged. Couldn't the
ballots -- and therefore the votes -- be affected by all that
touching and grabbing?

Full Story:
http://www.gopbi.com/partners/pbpost/epaper/editions/today/news_9.html

_________________________________________________________________

AOL contribution link:
Contribute

_________________________________________________________________

Paid for by Bush Cheney Recount
http://www.georgewbush.com

==============================================================================

To unsubscribe, please go here:

http://www.georgewbush.com/unsubscribe.asp?email=EBASS@ENRON.COM

To change
your e-mail address or any other subscription information, please go here:

http://www.georgewbush.com/MyGeorgeW.asp


Pat/Christian:
I'm assuming that the IOUs wouldn't be dumb enough to recommend something
that would have an adverse effect on DWR's creditworthiness, but wanted to
make sure you had a chance to review--just in case they're not as smart as I
assume.  Thanks.

Jeff

	"Daniel Douglass" <Douglass@ArterHadden.com>
	02/28/2001 04:44 PM

		 To: <Barbara_Klemstine@apsc.com>, <Bob_Anderson@apses.com>,
<Vicki_Sandler@apses.com>, <berry@apx.com>, <dcazalet@apx.com>,
<billr@calpine.com>, <jackp@calpine.com>, <Ken_Czarnecki@calpx.com>,
<gavaughn@duke-energy.com>, <rjhickok@duke-energy.com>, <gtbl@dynegy.com>,
<jmpa@dynegy.com>, <jdasovic@enron.com>, <susan_j_mara@enron.com>,
<Tamara_Johnson@enron.com>, <curt.Hatton@gen.pge.com>, <foothill@lmi.net>,
<camiessn@newwestenergy.com>, <jcgardin@newwestenergy.com>,
<jsmollon@newwestenergy.com>, <rsnichol@newwestenergy.com>,
<nam.nguyen@powersrc.com>, <Curtis_L_Kebler@reliantenergy.com>,
<rllamkin@seiworldwide.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Fwd: A.00-11-038 - Joint Application of SCE and PG&E for Rehearing

Edison and PG&E?have jointly filed the attached?request that  the Commission
immediately act to rescind D.01-01-061, or in the alternative  grant
rehearing and then significantly modify D.01-01-061. They specify that the
?Commission must act to:
?
(1) delete the requirement that the utilities send revenues to the
California Department of Water Resources (CDWR) based on the ratio of load
served;
?
(2)?clarify that the decision does not modify existing decisions  affecting
Utility Retained Generation (URG);
?
(3)?clarify how the Commission wants SCE to modify Advice Letter (AL)  1514-E
and to confirm that AL 1514-E should not be withdrawn until a replacement
advice letteris filed;
?
(4) remove the directive that the utilities be scheduling coordinators;  and

(5)?eliminate the requirement that the utilities hold sums owed to  CDWR in
trust.
?
Dan
Received: from dymwsm05.mailwatch.com by ArterHadden.com; Wed, 28 Feb 2001
14:17:35 -0800
Received: from dymw0105.mailwatch.com (dymw0105.allegro.net [204.253.83.227])
by dymwsm05.mailwatch.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id f1SMIj027723; Wed, 28
Feb 2001 17:18:45 -0500
Received: from 204.253.83.26 by dymw0105.mailwatch.com with SMTP (
WorldSecure Server SMTP Relay(WSS) v4.3); Wed, 28 Feb 01 17:16:14 -0500
X-Server-Uuid: c41a640a-a9e9-11d4-8124-00508bd3f8dc
Received: from dnsp1.sce.com (dnsp1.sce.com [155.13.48.3]) by
dymwsm11.mailwatch.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f1SLoDE29280; Wed, 28
Feb 2001 16:50:14 -0500
Received: from D058661.sce.com (D058661.sce.com [155.13.167.39]) by
dnsp1.sce.com (AIX4.3/8.9.3/5.5.5) with ESMTP id NAA59688; Wed, 28 Feb 2001
13:49:04 -0800
Received: from go2ntswpr01.sce.com (go2ntswpr01.sce.com [155.13.76.17]) by
D058661.sce.com (AIX4.3/8.9.3/5.5.5) with ESMTP id NAA57416; Wed, 28 Feb 2001
13:49:02 -0800
Received: from go2ntdomc01.sce.com (unverified) by go2ntswpr01.sce.com (
Content Technologies SMTPRS 2.0.15) with ESMTP id
<B0005981399@go2ntswpr01.sce.com>; Wed, 28 Feb 2001 13:48:23 -0800
From: Case.Admin@sce.com
Subject: A.00-11-038 - Joint Application of SCE and PG&E for Rehearing
To: jbushee@sablaw.com, kmccrea@sablaw.com, rogerberliner@bcjlaw.com,
rcsstl@cdmnet.com, mbrubaker@consultbai.com, anchau@shellus.com,
keith-sappenfield@reliantenergy.com, jsmollon@newwestenergy.com,
jlyoung@sempra.com, napedersen@jonesday.com, athomas@newenergy.com,
fchristi@arterhadden.com, kmcspadd@milbank.com, hchoy@isd.co.la.ca.us,
lgurick@calpx.com, douglass@arterhadden.com, randy_britt@mayco.com,
frank.cooley@sce.com, glwaas@calpx.com, uwuaregion5@earthlink.net,
fmo@sdcity.sannet.gov, jleslie@luce.com, julesan@aol.com, mshames@ucan.org,
jparrott@sempra.com, kmelville@sempra.com, bill.mccallum@ci.fresno.ca.us,
btenney@landuselaw.com, ronknecht@aol.com,
furutanj@efawest.navfac.navy.mil,   kpoole@adamsbroadwell.com,
mdjoseph@adamsbroadwell.com, rcosta@turn.org,   bfinkelstein@turn.org,
theresa_mueller@ci.sf.ca.us, jjz@cpuc.ca.gov,   mcx@cpuc.ca.gov,
chrisw@greenlining.org, joseh@lif.org, jnnc@chevron.com,
jlondon@gralegal.com, imoosen@gralegal.com, clpearce@duanemorris.com,
phanschen@mofo.com, tmberliner@duanemorris.com, smoss@hooked.net,
epoole@adplaw.com, rschmidt@bartlewells.com, chilen@llgm.com,
edwardoneill@dwt.com, lys@aelaw.com, jsqueri@gmssr.com, jbennett@gmssr.com,
bloomje@la.whitecase.com, pbray@newpower.com,
rick.counihan@greenmountain.com, thoulihan@mdbe.com, mday@gmssr.com,
jmalkin@orrick.com, lindseyhowdowning@dwt.com, mrh2@pge.com, whe1@pge.com,
ssmyers@worldnet.att.net, pxo2@pge.com, pat.williams@dhcmail.com,
wbooth@booth-law.com, jerryl@abag.ca.gov, mgomez1@bart.gov,
askaff@energy-law-group.com, hf@energy-law-group.com, pjpowerlaw@aol.com,
difellman@energy-law-group.com, nryan@environmentaldefense.org,
rrcollins@n-h-i.org, patrickm@crossborderenergy.com,
tomb@crossborderenergy.com, brbarkovich@earthlink.net, pmcdonne@wenet.net,
pjmuller@ricochet.net, berry@apx.com, jbradley@svmg.org,
sberlin@mccarthylaw.com, scottst@mid.org, bill@jbsenergy.com,
cmkehrein@ems-ca.com, jweil@aglet.org, abb@eslawfirm.com,
bpowers@seniors.org, dcarroll@dbsr.com, dkk@eslawfirm.com, ed@clfp.com,
howens@seniors.org, jtachera@energy.state.ca.us, sgreenberg@realenergy.com,
smutny@iepa.com, lmh@eslawfirm.com, hodgesjl@pacbell.net,
rpernell@energy.state.ca.us, kmills@cfbf.com, rliebert@cfbf.com,
aorchar@smud.org, mpa@aelaw.com, jcpaine@stoel.com, mhg@hetrading.com,
dws@keywaycorp.com, hbd@gweiss.com, gerhordt.herbert@msdw.com,
cread@steptoe.com, jogg@jhenergy.com, peter_fox-penner@brattle.com,
sdefrawi@efaches.navfac.navy.mil, bill.wells@afcesa.af.mil,
ad046@detroit.freenet.org, bob_anderson@apses.com, gdreed@sidley.com,
robert.d.schasel@fritolay.com, cyounger@manatt.com, dhuard@manatt.com,
rkeen@manatt.com, georgeperrault@msn.com, picketse@sce.com,
jsilva@edisonenterprises.com, LVanWagenen@sempra.com,
jbarthrop@powersavers.com, foothill@lmi.net, fosterbc@sce.com,
ljhubbard@sempra.com, ktilton@gralegal.com, paul.harris@bridge.com,
oshirock@pacbell.net, natutt@duanemorris.com, j3m9@pge.com,
musicamaria@yahoo.com, derkp@newsdata.com, luluw@newsdata.com,
tom.oneill@abnamro.com, mmattes@nossaman.com, RJP2@pge.com, ell5@pge.com,
jyf1@pge.com, NXK2@pge.com, rrh3@pge.com, ConsumersFirst@worldnet.att.net,
alexm@calpine.com, normkr@aol.com, gtbl@dynegy.com, joe.paul@dynegy.com,
honest@compuserve.com, jyoung@ebmud.com, jon.jacobs@paconsulting.com,
emitchel@angnewspapers.com, jptang@oaklandcityattorney.org,
rbw@mrwassoc.com, dmarcus@slip.net, jeff@hmhresources.com, ed@apx.com,
chrism@mid.org, fwmonier@tid.org, rmccann@cal.net, blaising@braunlegal.com,
melanie_gillette@rmiinc.com, twetzel@thermoecotek.com,
Slayman@energy.state.ca.us, swchurchill@juno.com, jdh@eslawfirm.com,
ddavie@hesinet.com, karen@klindh.com, cpeyton@sacbee.com, thaines@smud.org,
huse@eesconsulting.com, mer@cpuc.ca.gov, pva@cpuc.ca.gov, awp@cpuc.ca.gov,
cmw@cpuc.ca.gov, ctd@cpuc.ca.gov, dlf@cpuc.ca.gov, fua@cpuc.ca.gov,
jlo@cpuc.ca.gov, jsw@cpuc.ca.gov, jrd@cpuc.ca.gov, kok@cpuc.ca.gov,
kim@cpuc.ca.gov, lss@cpuc.ca.gov, gig@cpuc.ca.gov, rtf@cpuc.ca.gov,
raw@cpuc.ca.gov, sfc@cpuc.ca.gov, car@cpuc.ca.gov, txb@cpuc.ca.gov,
ztc@cpuc.ca.gov, nevillm@hdcdojnet.state.ca.us, dwrlegal1@water.ca.gov,
ath@cpuc.ca.gov, LKristov@energy.state.ca.us, randy.chinn@senate.ca.gov,
firmiyas@dof.ca.gov, rtavares@energy.state.ca.us,
mschwebs@energy.state.ca.us
cc: J.P.Shotwell@sce.com, Carol.Schmid-Frazee@sce.com
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.5  September 22, 2000
Message-ID: <OFBE50AE1E.86C111C2-ON08256A01.00764A8E@sce.com>
Sender: Susan.Quon@sce.com
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 13:48:20 -0800
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on GO2NTDOMC01/SVR/SCE/EIX(Release 5.0.5
|September 22, 2000) at 02/28/2001 01:48:23 PM
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-WSS-ID: 1683A7246930-01-01
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="0__=08256A0100764A8E8f9e8a93df938690918c08256A0100764A8E"

To all parties on the e-mail service list for A.00-11-038:

Attached is a copy of the Joint Application of SCE and PG&E for Rehearing
of D.01-01-06 which was filed today, February 28, 2001.   A copy is also
being served to all parties of record via U.S. mail.

(See attached file: JointApp.pdf)
 - JointApp.pdf


Joe,

We are extremely pleased with the support we receive from your team.
The problem was fixed very quickly.

Vince

From: Joe Langston/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/27/2001 11:31 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Recent Hardware Repair

Vince,

Recently the Hardware Services Team performed work on a piece of equipment
for you.  The Technician that performed the work was JD Marter, and this is
just a follow up to insure that your problem was resolved.  It is our goal to
provide you with the best service possible, so please feel free to respond to
this email if you have any comments that may help us provide you better
service in the future.  Attached you will find a work log detailing what was
done to resolve your issue. If you have any questions, or if the problem is
not completely resolved please feel free to contact me.

Thank You,

Joe Langston
Team Lead Hardware Services
Office:  713-345-8883
Cell:  713-545-5912
Pager: 877-239-2794


I guess we will just go without a contract.


Below please find the weekly status report for the Gas Trading Vision II. The project timeline is updated in the attached file.

GTV status meeting attendees:  Zhiyong Wei, Karima Husain, Francis Lim, Jeremy Wong, Bill Fortney, Nayan Dattani, Dave Nommensen, Russ Severson, Jay Krish, Mike Swaim, George Grant, Chuck Ames, Jeff Gossett, Geoff Storey.

Accomplishments:
?	Incorporating physcial deal positions in TDS:
o	Changes to CPR reader process & its unit testing have been completed.
o	Changes for the view aggregation are being tested.
o	The user has requested some changes for the position manager; hence, 2 more weeks are required for the completion of development of this task (please see the attached project timeline).

?	Single point of deal entry for term deals:
o	Establishing communication between TDS client & Sitara server & its testing has been completed.
o	Other IT items are in progress and on schedule (please see the attached project timeline).

?	Gas Daily deals:
o	Changes to TDS deal valuation are in progress and on schedule (please see the attached project timeline).
o	Creating GDI Calc in ERMS is in progress and on schedule (please see the attached project timeline).

?	Live feeds for Gas Daily/intra-month curves:
o	Development of live feeds has been completed, tested, user-approved and already in production.

Plans for the week ending 4/13/01:
?	Continue IT development of Phase I items.
?	Clarify user requirements for the Gas Daily reports.
?	Obtain sign-off for GTV-II, Phase 2 issues and timeline.

Issues:
None

Thanks

Zhiyong


thought you'd be interested to hear Chad's perspective here.....

---------------------- Forwarded by Jeff Bartlett/HOU/ECT on 11/29/2000 05:04
PM ---------------------------

"Chad Muir" <chad@campuspipeline.com> on 11/29/2000 04:09:40 PM
To: Jeff.Bartlett@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Re: quick question

Just got off the phone with Kira.  She asked me what y'all do and I probably
butchered it, but she sounded interested (especially when I closed by saying
it
would be a business services, fee-based revenue stream - from what I know in
the industry, Yahoo's all about that these days, trying to find complements to
its existing largely ad-driven model for which they are getting pummeled).
She
said you should forward any information on to her at kira@yahoo-inc.com.  To
reach her by phone (I'd recommend handling initial contact through email and
then suggesting phone time, but your call), I don't have her direct number,
but
called the main Yahoo corporate number 408-731-3300, then used the dial by
name
directory - her last name is spelled Zahn, but you have to keep adding letters
from her first name (i went through K-I) before it will recognize it.  She and
her husband both were in law school with me and are very, very cool folks.  He
works at Silicon Valley Bank now.

Let me know if there's anything else I can do to help.

chad

Jeff.Bartlett@enron.com wrote:

> Thanks for the perspective on Yahoo - very helpful, especially since we
> don't have much (any) business history with them.
> I'll be looking at W's 600 appointments next week to see if your name is
> there along with Ken Lay's (that rumor knocked $5B market cap from us
> today)
> jb
>
> "Chad Muir" <chad@campuspipeline.com> on 11/29/2000 02:14:52 PM
>
> To:   Jeff.Bartlett@enron.com
> cc:
> Subject:  Re: quick question
>
> Yes, I do.  Two actually.  Drew Lanham and Kira Zann.  Rather than me
> putting
> stuff in an email about which of the two you should go through, call me
> when
> you can.  I'm at the house all day today 435-655-2939.  Tomorrow I'm at the
> office, but can be reached by cell 801-556-8490.  There's a definite
> difference
> between the two, but they both work together.
>
> By the way, sorry we missed you over T-day weekend - hope you had a good
> weekend in OU country, despite the close game...  Let's try to get together
> over New Year's if you'll be around.  We're in Dec. 29-Jan. 2.
>
> chad
>
> Jeff.Bartlett@enron.com wrote:
>
> > Do you have any Business Development contacts at Yahoo?   We are trying
> to
> > initiate some dialouge regarding strategic parters for our B2B
> > transactional platform initiatives.
> > I would be willing to offer several Diet Cokes while you here next month
> as
> > payment for such consulting services....
> > jb


We are launching a number of committees to perform key functions across
Enron.  Enron,s breadth of activities and nonhierarchal organization make it
increasingly necessary to broaden the participation of Enron,s next
generation of leadership in the important decisions affecting the company.
Broadening participation will result in increased access to information as
decisions are made and will allow committee members to extend their working
relationships and influence throughout the company.

The committee charters and memberships are set forth below.  Not everyone
listed has been contacted in advance.  We urge you to serve if at all
possible, but, if you cannot, please contact the committee chair.

VP PRC

The VP PRC will continue to be responsible for evaluating the performance of
Enron,s Vice Presidents, determining promotions to Vice President, and
recommending promotions to Managing Director.  Additionally, the VP PRC will
review and propose changes to the PRC process, the performance evaluation
criteria and the promotion criteria.

The VP PRC will be chaired by Dave Delainey and its membership is as follows:

Tim Belden	Ben Glisan	Danny McCarty
Michael Brown	Joe Gold	Jeff McMahon
Rick Buy	Mark Haedicke	Rob Milnthorp
Wes Colwell	Jim Hughes	Matthew Scrimshaw
David Cox	Louise Kitchen	Jeff Shankman
Janet Dietrich	Michael Kopper	Richard Shapiro
Dave Duran	John Lavorato	Marty Sunde
Jim Fallon	Dan Leff

Analyst/Associate PRC

The analyst/associate PRC will be divided into 3 groups.  Enron Europe will
have the same committee evaluate analysts and associates.  This group will be
chaired by John Sherriff and its membership is as follows:

Pierre Aury	Kevin Heffron	Andreas Radmacher
Rob Bayley	Joe Hirl	Stuart Rexrode
Paul Chivers	Chris Mahoney	Marcello Romano
Markus Fiala	Christopher McKey	Bjarne Schieldrop
David Gallagher	Roy Poyntz	Ron Slimp
Bruce Garner	Paul Quilkey	Rob Stewart

The associate PRC for the Americas will be chaired by Stan Horton and its
membership is as follows:

Sally Beck 	Troy Henry	Kevin Presto
Jeremy Blachman	Sean Holmes 	Brad Richter
Don Black	Sean Long 	Stewart Seeligson
Dan Castagnola 	Rodney Malcolm	Hunter Shively
Joe Deffner	Scott Neal 	Jim Steffes
Kevin Garland	John Nowlan 	Andy Zipper
David Gorte	Ozzie Pagan

The analyst PRC for the Americas will be chaired by Steve Kean and its
membership is as follows:

Federico Cerisoli 	Mark Jackson 	Everett Plante
Jennifer Fraser 	Ben Jacoby 	Paul Racicot
Derrick Davies	Steve Jernigan 	Angela Schwarz
Scott Gahn 	Jay Lewis 	Ed Smida
Rod Hayslett	Cheryl Lipshutz 	Jon Thomsen
Rogers Herndon 	Michael Mann	Emilio Vicens
Brenda Herod 	Ed McMichael 	Frank Vickers
Kevin Howard 	Steve Meyers

Analyst/Associate Program

The most essential determinant of Enron,s continued growth is our ability to
attract and develop new talent.  The analyst/associate program has been the
biggest contributor to our success in this area.  Charlene Jackson, currently
leading our analyst/associate program, has taken a commercial position in
EES, account management organization.  We thank Charlene for her hard work
and many contributions to the program.  Going forward, this program will be
administered by a committee chaired by John Sherriff, CEO of Enron Europe.
The members of this committee are listed below.  Billy Lemmons, currently
Vice President of Enron Global Markets, will lead the day-to-day operations
of the program. Billy joined Enron in 1992, and has served in a variety of
commercial capacities across the company and has been an active participant
in the Associate /Analyst program.  Please join us in congratulating Billy on
his new responsibilities.

Phillip Allen	Andy Fastow	Eric Shaw
Robina Barker-Bennett	Kevin Garland	Hunter Shively
Rick Causey	Ken Rice	Stu Staley
Joe Deffner

Culture

We are combining the vision and values, diversity and corporate
responsibility committees into a single corporate culture committee chaired
by Ken Lay.  Cindy Olson, Beth Tilney and Kelly Kimberly will serve as
executive directors of this committee.  This committee will focus on
leadership and work-life issues (making it easier to attract and retain the
best talent), in addition to continuing the work of the vision and values,
diversity and corporate responsibility task forces.  The members of this
committee are as follows:

Greg Adams	Louise Kitchen	Mark Palmer
Shelley Corman	Michael Kopper	Paula Rieker
Janet Dietrich	Richard Lewis	Jeff Shankman
Jeff Donahue	Sean Long	Mitch Taylor
Gene Humphrey	Dan McCarty	Mike Terraso
Robert Jones	Jean Mrha

The Corporate Policy Committee will conduct the MD PRC and review the
recommendations of the other committees, giving substantial deference to the
decisions of those other committees.  We will be forming other committees to
deal with other significant functions, tasks and issues facing the company.


What a great addition to my day.

I'm getting close to being finished with the year end crises (I hope I hope I
hope), and I'm looking forward to fuelcelling again.  Thanks for being
patient.

See you tomorrow.

Kay


Sorry it didn't work out between you and EGM, but I'm sure you made the right
decision for you.  Best of luck.

Jeff


-----Original Message-----
From:  Conwell, Wendy
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 5:33 PM
To: Tribolet, Michael; Bradford, William S.
Subject: California Exposure - SCE/PGE

Per your request, please find the attached California Exposure File as of COB
04/18/01.  Please call with questions or comments.

WEndy


Here is the projected subscribed capacity and revenue through 2010.  This was updated in February, 2002.  Please review it to determine all of this info is appropriate to be provided to the rating agencies.  Most (if not all) of TW's contracts have confidentiality provisions concerning the rates.  I'm assuming we have Confidentiality Agreements with the rating agencies.


Reservation status has changed to RECEIVED. See attachment.

ASSIGNMENT_REF = 30821
SELLER_CODE = AZPS
SELLER_DUNS = 958982563
CUSTOMER_CODE = EPMI
CUSTOMER_DUNS = 848921276
AFFILIATE_FLAG = 0
PATH_NAME = W/AZPS/AZPS-AZPS/FOURCORNE345 - PNPKAPS230//
POINT_OF_RECEIPT = FOURCORNE345
POINT_OF_DELIVERY = PNPKAPS230
SOURCE = FOURCORNERS
SINK = PNPK
CAPACITY = 25
CAPACITY_REQUESTED = 25
SERVICE_INCREMENT = HOURLY
TS_CLASS = FIRM
TS_TYPE = POINT_TO_POINT
TS_PERIOD = OFF_PEAK
TS_WINDOW = FIXED
TS_SUBCLASS = WHEEL
NERC_CURTAILMENT_PRIORITY = Nerc Priority 1
OTHER_CURTAILMENT_PRIORITY = Default
START_TIME = 06/16/2002
STOP_TIME = 06/16/2002
CEILING_PRICE = 3.13
OFFER_PRICE = 3.13
BID_PRICE = 3.13
PRICE_UNITS = $/mW
PRECONFIRMED = YES
ANC_SVC_LINK = N/A
ANC_SVC_REQ = N/A
POSTING_REF = 0
SALE_REF =
REQUEST_REF =
DEAL_REF =
NEGOTIATED_PRICE_FLAG =
STATUS = CONFIRMED
STATUS_NOTIFICATION = lisa.gang@enron.com
STATUS_COMMENTS =
TIME_QUEUED = 06/14/2002
RESPONSE_TIME_LIMIT =
TIME_OF_LAST_UPDATE = 06/14/2002
PRIMARY_PROVIDER_COMMENTS =
SELLER_COMMENTS =
CUSTOMER_COMMENTS = FOR INFO CALL (503)464-5070
SELLER_NAME = AZPS
SELLER_PHONE = 602.250.1128
SELLER_FAX = 602.250.1155
SELLER_EMAIL = oasisadm@apsc.com
CUSTOMER_NAME = Enron Power Marketing, Inc.
CUSTOMER_PHONE = (713)853-3801
CUSTOMER_FAX = (713)646-8272
CUSTOMER_EMAIL = bill.rust@enron.com
REASSIGNED_REF = 0
REASSIGNED_CAPACITY = 0
REASSIGNED_START_TIME =
REASSIGNED_STOP_TIME =


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Stokley/HOU/ECT on 04/02/2001 11:49 AM ---------------------------

Murray P O'Neil
02/05/2001 02:17 PM
To:	Volume_Management_Portland
cc:
Subject:	Short Pay Letter

FYI...

This is the letter which was sent to our service customers.

If you have any questions please let me know.

Thanks - MO
---------------------- Forwarded by Murray P O'Neil/HOU/ECT on 02/05/2001 02:24 PM ---------------------------
To:	Murray P O'Neil/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:	Short Pay Letter


Thank your email.  I am forwarding it on to Robert Jones, VP of HR for the
Net Works group and he will make sure that it gets wide distribution for
possible positions.

Mike McConnell


Great thanks

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	May, Tom
Sent:	Monday, October 01, 2001 2:42 PM
To:	Kitchen, Louise
Subject:	Services Presentation

Louise,

I eliminated one of the examples as Frontera is not the greatest deal.

Tom.

 << File: Services Board Meeting.ppt >>


Dear Joannie,

The ornament is fantastic and very appropriate this year.  We will need to
get an exact head count for the Enron order.  The corporate secretary
usually gives me an exact directors list and then Ken is the one that
decides which of his executives are invited to the dinner and Rosie provides
me with a list.

Additionally, I would like 15 ornaments for my personal use that I would
like to get ordered ASAP.  Is your source giving you a discount and if so,
how much?  I have several sources for getting discounts on most items,
including Radko ornaments, that I use every year.  Let's compare prices.
Thank you.  Linda

-----Original Message-----
From: Williamson, Joannie [mailto:Joannie.Williamson@ENRON.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 10:24 AM
To: Linda Lay
Cc: jessica
Subject: FW: Special Radko Ornament

Mrs. Lay,

Would you be intereted in giving these ornaments as gifts.  If so, let
me know the quantity and I will place the order for you.

Thanks,
Joannie
713-853-1769

-----Original Message-----
From: Nadasky, Marge
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 9:02 AM
To: Fleming, Rosalee; Taylor, Liz M.; Daw, Nicki; Williamson, Joannie;
Schoppe, Tammie; Hillis, Kimberly; Chapman, Kay; Phillips, Cathy; Burns,
Jennifer; Ford, Sue; Schiller, Marsha; Marshall, Lucy; Blackwood,
Connie; Spiller, Tina; Valdez, Christina; Costello, Lisa; Stark, Cindy;
Armstrong, Julie; Venable, Rachael; Hooks, Barbara; Westbrook, Sharron;
Tijerina, Shirley; Harris, Stephanie J; Elbertson, Janette; Heathman,
Karen K.; Hennessy, Rita; Dorsey, Joyce; Fallon, Susan; Llamas-Granado,
Anita; Rushing, Rebekah; McMahon, Kathy; Clyatt, Julie; Walt, John
Subject: Special Radko Ornament

I had a vendor send this to me.  It is a special Radko ornament he
designed in remembrance of the recent disasters in NY and Washington.
The proceeds from the sell of this are going to the relief efforts.  I
thought it might be of interest to you as a possible holiday gift.  The
cost is around $30.  The problem is, we would need to reserve some by
this Friday.  I'm happy to coordinate one consolidated order if this is
of interest.  Please get back to me ASAP and let me know.  Thanks.

-----Original Message-----
From: Diane Murphy [mailto:dmurphy@Ashford.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 11:25 AM
To: Nadasky, Marge
Subject: RE: Radko Ornaments

Sorry, I thought I attached this.

-----Original Message-----
From: Nadasky, Marge [mailto:Marge.Nadasky@ENRON.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 10:53 AM
To: Diane Murphy
Subject: RE: Radko Ornaments

Do you have a picture of it you can forward over to me to look at?

-----Original Message-----
From: Diane Murphy [mailto:dmurphy@Ashford.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 10:48 AM
To: Nadasky, Marge
Subject: Radko Ornaments

Holiday 2001
   <<...OLE_Obj...>>

Christopher Radko "Brave Heart" ornament.  They are donating the
proceeds of
this ornament to the Relief Fund of the American Red Cross in NY.  Are
you
interested in ordering these for holiday this year.  We can imprint your
logo and a message on the hang tag as we did last year.

Please let me know, they are in production on these to make the holiday
delivery schedule.  They need orders asap.

I hope things are going ok for you.  It has been such a horrible week
for us
all.  It is very hard to push forward and past this.

Regards,

Diane Murphy
Account Manager
Ashford Corporate Gifts
(713)369-2372
dmurphy@ashford.com

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence
a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not
be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


We have been asked to justify our  proposal to purchase third party risk
management software rather than use in-house ENA systems.  Since there are
affiliate issues as addressed below, please give us your opinion of the risk
we might run in trying to use ENA's systems.
---------------------- Forwarded by Lee Ferrell/ET&S/Enron on 11/16/2000
03:28 PM ---------------------------

Lisa Sawyer
11/16/2000 01:48 PM
To: Lee Ferrell/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc: Steve Hotte/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Vernon Mercaldo/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Shelley
Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Beth Perlman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard
Burchfield/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen Stock/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Risk System Alternatives Next Steps

Lee,
Just to recap the meeting with Richard Burchfield and Steve Stock, based on
the requirements that you and Vernon have identified, we would need to use
several of the system components including TAG, ERMS, GLOBAL COUNTERPARTY,
CREDIT, and UNIFY for settlements.  All of these applications are tightly
integrated.  We considered moving them into the ETS environment which would
separate the applications, but this would be a very large undertaking and
would be a resource intensive effort.  Therefore, due to the size, complexity
and integration of the applications, the group came to the conclusion that it
would be more timely and cost effective from an inception as well as
maintenance standpoint that ETS would have to share these systems with the
marketing group, and that porting them to the ETS environment as separate
application images would not be good from an overall migration as well as
support standpoint.  Additionally, we considered the EnPower System which is
also integrated into GLOBAL COUNTERPARTY, CREDIT and UNIFY.  We are planning
on a demo Friday morning, but there may be some functionality that you all
are looking for related to gas that EnPower cannot provide at this time and
would require some customization.  We'll know more tomorrow after the demo.

Regarding security, these applications are secured to segregate the data, but
we need an approval from Legal that it would be ok to use shared resources
from the IT standpoint.  This would include application developers and
database administrators.  Additionally, we would have to go through the
process of verifying that there would be no security leaks where it would be
possible for a marketer to run a report on pipeline related data, etc...  If
we can get an ok from Legal regardinig sharing of resources, then one of
these options can be explored further, but if we cannot get approval on
sharing of resources, it doesn't look like porting either of these
applications into the ETS environment as standalone apps would be the most
timely or cost effective way to go at this time.  Can you get a stand from
Legal regarding this issue?  Thanks.


----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 09/26/2000 04:51 PM -----

	Edmund Szol <eszol@nwlink.com>
	09/24/2000 05:29 PM

		 To: undisclosed-recipients:;
		 cc:
		 Subject: Angle Master Invention

Please have someone contact me at 425-503-4339 (cell telephone) or at the
address on the web site underlined below  if
Enron has an interest in the U.S. and internationally patented Angle Master.
We now have marketing prototypes made, patents in place, outstanding consumer
interest and are ready to proceed to the
next step.
The Angle Master can be very large or  small.. The output gear smoothly
transitions from 0-90 degrees at high torque to
to reach or drill any angle. The input gear can be driven by any device. No
product on the market can perform
like the Angle Master. I can see the use of the Angle Master for various
drilling applications, including horizontal drilling
Professional mechanics in all fields who have seen the smaller Angle Master
all want one. We have endorsements from professional
drivers, mechanics, and many others.
A recently retired Captain of a nuclear aircraft carrier has stated in a
letter "....The use of the Angle Master.... will
result in a significant time savings which in turn will increase combat
readiness of aircraft and ships due to the more rapid
turnaround of out of commission systems. Every mechanic will want the Angle
Master in their toolbox after they have seen it in
operation."
A Senior Vice President of Operations for a major Aerospace Company has
stated in writing " .... Prototype manufacturing,
tool manufacturing, assembly, repair and overhaul operations will all benefit
from the flexibility of the Angle Master."
The attached web page location underlined below is not yet completed, but it
indicates just a few
of thesmaller scale uses for the Angle Master.
I look forward to hearing from you.

Sincerely,

Ed Szol
President
Angle Master Industries LTD.
http://www.nwlink.com/~eszol/index.html


National crisis eclipses energy woes
The Orange County Register, September 13, 2001

No confidentiality for energy producers
The Sacramento Bee, September 13, 2001

UCLA: Power Crisis Damage To Calif Economy Seen Lessened
Dow Jones Newswire, September 13, 2001

PG&E Says California Power Cost Request Is Illegal, Overstated
Bloomberg, September 13, 2001

Developments in California's energy crisis
Dow Jones, September 13, 2001

UCLA: Power Crisis Damage To Calif Economy Seen Lessened
Dow Jones, September 13, 2001

Calif PUC Won't Vote Thu On $12.5B Rev-Bond-Related Items
Dow Jones Energy Services, September 13, 2001

Calif Lawmakers Call For Federal Probe Of State Pwr Mkt
Dow Jones Energy Services, September 13, 2001

State regulators delay decision on power rate agreement
San Diego Tribune, September 12, 2001

State Faces Crunch Time to Deal With Electricity Costs
LA Times, September 13, 2001

National crisis eclipses energy woes
State's bond sale, as well as Edison bailout, could be casualties of Wall Street turmoil.
September 13, 2001
By JOHN HOWARD
The Orange County Register
SACRAMENTO -- Terrorist attacks that disrupted Wall Street could further delay California's plan to help itself - and Southern California Edison - recover from the energy crisis, experts said Wednesday.
Among other things, a $12.5 billion bond sale - designed to repay the state for billions it spent buying emergency electricity - could be delayed until next year, one legislative leader said Wednesday, although others expect a shorter wait. The $12.5 billion in borrowing would be the largest municipal bond sale in U.S. history. It was expected to happen next month, after several earlier postponements.
Putting it off means that if the state's credit rating drops within the next few months, the interest rate on the bond repayment would be higher. Delays on the sale beyond Oct. 31 could cost ratepayers hundreds of millions of dollars in interest on another loan the state has already taken.
Several pieces of California's recovery plan are still in play as the Legislature heads toward a scheduled Friday adjournment and Wall Street's attention is on other matters. A summary:
Terrorist attacks forcing the temporary closure of Wall Street could slow down getting the $12.5 billion in energy bonds being marketed.
"There certainly is a direct impact on Wall Street," said David Freeman, the head of the new California Power Authority. "If the place that is going to loan you money nearly got bombed out, you have to assume that things won't move at the same pace that they would have. But I think that will be a short-term delay."
But a top legislator disagrees.
"We're looking at January at the earliest and probably later," Jaime Fisfis, spokesman for Assembly Republican leader Dave Cox, said, referring to the $12.5 billion sale.
Another factor, not related to the terrorist attacks, also is conspiring to delay the sale. The PUC's long-awaited decision of whether to sign off on a crucial piece of the bond sale was to be made today. But PUC President Loretta Lynch says the proposal is complex and requires a longer look, perhaps until Sept. 20. The PUC's approval is needed before the bonds can be marketed.
The state took out a short-term loan of $4.3 billion to cover energy costs while a larger bond sale was developed.
But that loan, which was to be paid back with the bond money, has a sharp interest penalty if it isn't paid off by Oct. 31. After that, the interest rate rises from the original 4.14 percent to about 7 percent - which means the state would have to cover an additional $123 million to pay back the loan.
Many, even in Gov. Gray Davis' administration, believe missing the Oct. 31 deadline is likely.
"I wouldn't be a bit shocked by that," said Steven Maviglio, Davis' spokesman.
Two unrelated bond sales, one for $5.7 billion and the other for $500 million, have been postponed for at least a couple of weeks because of the New York attacks. State officials say they want to wait to go to market with the two bond sales, both routine, until the turmoil in the East settles down.
The proposed bailout of Edison also could be hurt by the New York attacks, said one energy expert, who noted that lawmakers have only until midnight Friday to act on the plan, which might include financing the utility's debt with bonds. If the Legislature adjourns without providing help to Edison, it is widely believed the utility will go into bankruptcy.
"I believe the Edison bailout package is now nonexistent," said Gary Ackerman of the Western Power Trading Forum, which represents energy producers.
Maviglio disagreed, saying the rescue plan will rise or fall on its own.
"I don't think there's any effect" on the bailout, he said.

No confidentiality for energy producers
By Claire Cooper
Bee Legal Affairs Writer
(Published Sept. 13, 2001)
SAN FRANCISCO -- Energy generators were rebuffed Wednesday in an attempt to force state Attorney General Bill Lockyer not to disclose marketing data he has subpoenaed from them.
Without comment or dissent, the California Supreme Court voted not to review lower court decisions allowing the attorney general to share the data with others looking into possible manipulation of energy supplies, including state regulators, federal prosecutors and officials in Oregon and Washington state.
In May, three generators -- Dynegy, Reliant and Mirant -- agreed to turn over the subpoenaed documents to Lockyer. Lockyer, in turn, agreed not to share them, pending court review of the companies' confidentiality claim.
A Los Angeles trial judge ruled against all three companies. Reliant and Mirant took the issue to the state Court of Appeal and lost there. Only Reliant then appealed to the state Supreme Court, which considered and turned down the appeal at its weekly closed-door case conference.
Deputy Attorney General Hiren Patel said it would have been absurd if Lockyer, California's chief law enforcement officer, could not divulge unlawful activity to appropriate authorities.
He said that while some generators have been turning over the subpoenaed documents, Reliant recently reneged on its promise to do so.
John Pernick, Reliant's lawyer, said he would have "no comment at this time."

UCLA: Power Crisis Damage To Calif Economy Seen Lessened
Updated: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 05:52 PM ET
By Jessica Berthold
OF DOW JONES NEWSWIRES
LOS ANGELES (Dow Jones)--California's energy crisis will drain the state's economy of billions of dollars, but will have a smaller impact than previously thought, said Christopher Thornberg, economist and co-author of a report issued Wednesday by the University of California at Los Angeles' Anderson Business Forecast team.
The difference can be largely chalked up to consumers paying less for electricity than was expected, he said.
In our last paper, we said that, given the price of power and what we expected people to consume, rate increases would have a 1.7% drain on the economy," Thornberg said. "Now we think it will be a one-half percent drain."
That translates to $5 billion lost yearly because of the electricity crisis, compared to June's estimate of $17 billion. The state's economy produces $1.2 trillion per year.
Much of the state's lost dollars will come from a decline in consumer and business spending in reaction to higher electricity rates, the report said. The California Public Utilities Commission passed a 3 cent per kilowatt hour rate hike for customers of PG&E Corp (PCG </investments/quotes/?symbol=PCG>, news </investments/news/?symbol=PCG>, msgs </investments/discuss/?symbol=PCG>) unit Pacific Gas and Electric Co. and Edison International (EIX </investments/quotes/?symbol=EIX>, news </investments/news/?symbol=EIX>, msgs </investments/discuss/?symbol=EIX>) unit Southern California Edison in March, and is expected to pass a similar increase for Sempra (SRE </investments/quotes/?symbol=SRE>, news </investments/news/?symbol=SRE>, msgs </investments/discuss/?symbol=SRE>) unit San Diego Gas and Electric Co. soon.
"The costs imposed on ratepayers by the state's PUC will reduce economic growth from what it otherwise would be," the report said. "These costs will total billion of dollars annually, and will significantly reduce consumer and business spending for other goods and services."
Still, the state was spared the cost of a widely-anticipated summer electricity crisis, Thornberg noted.
The UCLA team's last report, in June, predicted that the summer would bring 36 hours of blackouts and sky-high wholesale power prices, dealing a concentrated blow to the state's economy. But the summer crisis failed to materialize due to mild weather, conservation efforts and a federal price control order that has brought wholesale prices down, the report said.
"(The energy crisis) is in the process of being converted from a short-term crisis into a longer-term vexation which will nag us with a combination of higher energy prices, shakier public credit, bankrupt utilities, and fewer choices in how state revenues will be expended," the report says.
Because wholesale prices have declined so dramatically, the UCLA team no longer predicts the state will be have $17 billion in debt in 2005 due to the energy crisis, Thornberg said. A co-author of the June report said that utility ratepayer revenue would not be enough to repay a $13.4 billion revenue bond sale planned by the state to smooth out its power purchases. That's no longer the case, Thornberg aid.
"Under the current circumstances, I'd say there will be enough in retail rates to pay the state for power", he said.
The costs California has been spared by the lack of a summer electricity crisis will be offset by the effects of the national recession and global economic slump, the report said. Personal income, which accounts for more than 80% of gross state product, slowed to 4% in the second quarter of 2001 from 13% in the third quarter of 2000. Unemployment has risen from 4.5% in February to 4.9% in July, and will hit 6% in 2002, the report said.
"Although California's economy is not clearly in recession at this point, most indicators of the job market show an end to the expansion," the report said.

PG&E Says California Power Cost Request Is Illegal, Overstated
By Dennis Walters
San Francisco, Sept. 12 (Bloomberg) -- PG&E Corp.'s Pacific Gas & Electric, California's largest utility, said a proposed plan to let the state sell $12.5 billion bonds for its power costs is illegal and overstates how much money the state needs.
The comments came in a filing with the California Public Utilities Commission, which is considering a plan for repaying the state for power purchases. California's Department of Water Resources plans to sell the bonds, the largest municipal debt offering in U.S. history, to repay the state's general fund for loans and to cover other power costs.
The proposed plan is ``blatantly arbitrary, discriminatory, and unlawful'' and should be rejected, Pacific Gas & Electric said in its filing.
The water department this year has spent more than $8.6 billion buying power on behalf of the PG&E unit and Edison International's Southern California Edison, the state's No. 2 utility. The utilities became insolvent after buying power at higher costs than they could charge customers under California law.
In a rush to give the water department a ``blank check,'' the regulator proposes illegally shifting $600 million of costs to Pacific Gas from customers in Southern California, the filing said. Echoing past complaints by the utility, the filing also said the water department has overestimated power costs and should face public hearings over its revenue request.
Southern California Edison, in comments filed with the PUC today, also disagreed with parts of the proposed plan. Edison said the plan would ``effectively set a fixed rate'' for its own generating plants and contracts with alternative-energy providers, raising the risk that the utility wouldn't recover all its costs under certain circumstances.
PG&E's utility filed for bankruptcy protection in April. California lawmakers are debating a rescue plan for Edison's utility.
The PUC, citing the disruption caused by yesterday's terrorist attacks, has postponed a vote on the power plan that had been scheduled for tomorrow. The commissioners will reschedule the vote at tomorrow's meeting.

Developments in California's energy crisis
By The Associated Press

09/13/2001
Associated Press Newswires
Copyright 2001. The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.

Developments in California's energy crisis:
THURSDAY:
- No power alerts Thursday as electricity reserves remain above seven percent.
WEDNESDAY:
- State energy regulators said they'll delay a vote on a plan that cedes the Public Utilities Commission's ratemaking authority to the state Department of Water Resources. The PUC still plans to meet Thursday, but the commissioners will choose a new date, possibly for next week, to vote on the plan, said Terri Prosper, PUC spokeswoman.
- The attacks at the nation's financial center delayed two bond issues for the state of California, one totaling $5.7 billion, but won't have much affect on the state's biggest project - $12.5 billion to repay the state's general fund for energy purchases.
- State Auditor Elaine Howle said the California National Guard and Office of Emergency Services each have weaknesses in their blackout preparation procedures.
- An executive with the city's Department of Water and Power, Tom LaBonge, and a former Los Angeles Community College District leader, Beth Farfield, appeared headed for an October runoff for a seat on the Los Angeles City Council.
THE PROBLEM:
High demand, high wholesale energy costs, transmission glitches and a tight supply worsened by scarce hydroelectric power in the Northwest and maintenance at aging California power plants are all factors in California's electricity crisis.
Southern California Edison and Pacific Gas and Electric say they've lost nearly $14 billion since June 2000 to high wholesale prices the state's electricity deregulation law bars them from passing on to consumers. PG&E, saying it hasn't received the help it needs from regulators or state lawmakers, filed for federal bankruptcy protection April 6.
Electricity and natural gas suppliers, scared off by the companies' poor credit ratings, are refusing to sell to them, leading the state in January to start buying power for the utilities' nearly 9 million residential and business customers. The state also is buying power for a third investor-owned utility, San Diego Gas & Electric, which is in better financial shape than much larger Edison and PG&E but also is struggling with high wholesale power costs.
The Public Utilities Commission has approved average rate increases of 37 percent for the heaviest residential customers and 38 percent for commercial customers, and hikes of up to 49 percent for industrial customers and 15 percent or 20 percent for agricultural customers to help finance the state's multibillion-dollar power buys.

UCLA: Power Crisis Damage To Calif Economy Seen Lessened
 By Jessica Berthold
 09/12/2001 Dow Jones Energy Service (Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.) OF DOW JONES NEWSWIRES

LOS ANGELES -(Dow Jones)- California's energy crisis will drain the state's economy of billions of dollars, but will have a smaller impact than previously thought, said Christopher Thornberg, economist and co-author of a report issued Wednesday by the University of California at Los Angeles' Anderson Business Forecast team.
 The difference can be largely chalked up to consumers paying less for electricity than was expected, he said.
"In our last paper, we said that, given the price of power and what we expected people to consume, rate increases would have a 1.7% drain on the economy," Thornberg said. "Now we think it will be a one-half percent drain."
That translates to $5 billion lost yearly because of the electricity crisis, compared to June's estimate of $17 billion. The state's economy produces $1.2 trillion per year.
Much of the state's lost dollars will come from a decline in consumer and business spending in reaction to higher electricity rates, the report said. The California Public Utilities Commission passed a 3 cent per kilowatt hour rate hike for customers of PG&E Corp (PCG) unit Pacific Gas and Electric Co. and Edison International (EIX) unit Southern California Edison in March, and is expected to pass a similar increase for Sempra (SRE) unit San Diego Gas and Electric Co. soon.
"The costs imposed on ratepayers by the state's PUC will reduce economic growth from what it otherwise would be," the report said. "These costs will total billion of dollars annually, and will significantly reduce consumer and business spending for other goods and services."
Still, the state was spared the cost of a widely-anticipated summer electricity crisis, Thornberg noted.
The UCLA team's last report, in June, predicted that the summer would bring 36 hours of blackouts and sky-high wholesale power prices, dealing a concentrated blow to the state's economy. But the summer crisis failed to materialize due to mild weather, conservation efforts and a federal price control order that has brought wholesale prices down, the report said.
"(The energy crisis) is in the process of being converted from a short-term crisis into a longer-term vexation which will nag us with a combination of higher energy prices, shakier public credit, bankrupt utilities, and fewer choices in how state revenues will be expended," the report says.
Because wholesale prices have declined so dramatically, the UCLA team no longer predicts the state will be have $17 billion in debt in 2005 due to the energy crisis, Thornberg said. A co-author of the June report said that utility ratepayer revenue would not be enough to repay a $13.4 billion revenue bond sale planned by the state to smooth out its power purchases. That's no longer the case, Thornberg aid.
"Under the current circumstances, I'd say there will be enough in retail rates to pay the state for power", he said.
The costs California has been spared by the lack of a summer electricity crisis will be offset by the effects of the national recession and global economic slump, the report said. Personal income, which accounts for more than 80% of gross state product, slowed to 4% in the second quarter of 2001 from 13% in the third quarter of 2000. Unemployment has risen from 4.5% in February to 4.9% in July, and will hit 6% in 2002, the report said.
"Although California's economy is not clearly in recession at this point, most indicators of the job market show an end to the expansion," the report said.

Calif PUC Won't Vote Thu On $12.5B Rev-Bond-Related Items

09/12/2001
Dow Jones Energy Service
(Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)

LOS ANGELES -(Dow Jones)- The California Public Utilities Commission won't vote Thursday on items related to the state's sale of $12.5 billion in revenue bonds, a spokeswoman for CPUC president Loretta Lynch said Wednesday.
The CPUC will either meet Friday, or wait until its next scheduled meeting Sept. 20 to discuss the items, she said.
The items had already been postponed from Sept. 6.
The postponed items include a rate agreement that would allow the state Department of Water Resources to recover power-buying costs without regulatory review, and an item that would establish how much revenue the DWR can receive for power purchases through 2002.

The CPUC will still hold its meeting Thursday, but won't be taking any votes, commission spokeswoman Terrie Prosper said. The commission will announce Thursday when it will have its next meeting.
"We are trying to coordinate the commissioners' schedules to see when they can meet next week," Prosper said.
The votes are being delayed as a result of the closure of the commission's offices Tuesday after terrorist attacks on the East Coast. Tuesday's deadline to file comments on the DWR revenue requirement order has also been extended to Wednesday at 5 p.m. PDT (0000 GMT Thursday).
The CDWR has been buying power on behalf of the state's investor-owned utilities since January. CPUC votes on the proposed decisions are crucial to the state's plans to sell a record $12.5 billion in revenue bonds later this autumn. The bonds will be used to repay about $6 billion borrowed from the state's general fund, and a $4.3 billion bridge loan for power purchases.
State Treasurer Philip Angelides has said he will comment on any revision to the bond sale's timetable after the CPUC takes all necessary votes.
The postponement of bond-related votes Thursday will also affect items dealing with the suspension of retail choice of electricity providers, and servicing agreements between the utilities and the DWR. A vote on a 12% rate hike for customers of Sempra Energy (SRE) unit San Diego Gas & Electric is also postponed.

Calif Lawmakers Call For Federal Probe Of State Pwr Mkt
By Jason Leopold

09/12/2001
Dow Jones Energy Service
(Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)

OF DOW JONES NEWSWIRES

LOS ANGELES -(Dow Jones)- A dozen California Republican state senators called for a federal investigation into the state's grid operator and power buying arm, claiming the agencies may be manipulating the wholesale electricity market by understating the state's power needs in order to obtain a higher price out-of-market for its excess supply, according to a letter sent to the chairman of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
The letter signed by Senate Republican Minority Leader Jim Brulte, R-Rancho Cucamonga, Sen. Ray Haynes, R-Riverside, and others in the minority leadership, alleges the California Independent System Operator has understated the state's daily power needs in order to allow the Department of Water Resources to get a higher price for its excess electricity through "out-of-market" calls.
The ISO maintains reliability of the grid and operates the spot market in California. The DWR is the agency that has been buying electricity since January in lieu of the state's struggling utilities and signed $43 billion in long-term power pacts.
The ISO has denied the allegations, but the agency has come under fire for what some describe as market manipulation.
"It could be argued that a higher price for excess electricity is needed for political reasons, because DWR has been selling power for a low as $1 per megawatt-hour, after entering into long-term contracts averaging $138 per megawatt-hour," the letter, sent to FERC Chairman Pat Wood.
An aide to Wood said the letter has not yet been reviewed by the agency.
The letter claims the ISO made numerous out-of-market sales for DWR power, "especially" in June.
"Evidence indicates that the out-of-market calls, especially those in June of 2001, were many times larger than load imbalances."
ISO Confirms Market Dysfunctional
Last week, an ISO spokesman said the agency's market "was not working as it was designed to" refusing to elaborate.
The ISO may also be in violation of its federal regulations requiring it to make the cheapest power available in the state before turning to more expensive supplies.
Fishman confirmed that the ISO has "at times" taken bids out of sequence, turning to higher priced power because the state can obtain the more expensive power quicker.
In August, the ISO confirmed that it reduced power at low-cost power plants, possibly, to allow the DWR to keep its excess supply.
The state's Big Five power generators also filed a complaint with FERC saying the ISO has failed to pay the companies $2 billion for electricity supplied since mid-January.

State regulators delay decision on power rate agreement

September 12, 2001
SACRAMENTO - State energy regulators said Wednesday they'll delay a vote on a plan that cedes the Public Utilities Commission's ratemaking authority to the state Department of Water Resources.
The PUC still plans to meet Thursday, but the commissioners will choose a new date, possibly for next week, to vote on the plan, said Terri Prosper, PUC spokeswoman.
With most public offices closed Tuesday due to the terrorist attacks in Washington, D.C., and New York, many parties requested more time to file comments on the plan, Prosper said. That means PUC officials will also need additional time to review the comments, she said.
The proposed agreement would let DWR pass on all power costs to customers without oversight by state regulators to ensure those costs are fair and reasonable.
The DWR has been purchasing power for customers of three major utilities since January, when record-high wholesale energy costs brought the utilities to the brink of bankruptcy. One of the utilities, Pacific Gas and Electric Co., filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in April.
The other two, Southern California Edison and San Diego Gas & Electric Co., are working with state officials on rescue plans that would let the utilities issue revenue bonds for their debts.
Critics of the DWR draft rate agreement, which includes the utilities and several consumer groups, say the PUC plan would let the department raise customer rates to pay for energy costs. It would prevent the PUC from reviewing energy costs or contracts to ensure they were reasonable.
DWR officials said they need that guarantee to attract investors when they sell $12.5 billion in revenue bonds this fall. Ratepayers will pay off those bonds over 15 years, and state officials say a solid revenue stream could help keep interest low.

State Faces Crunch Time to Deal With Electricity Costs
 Energy: With one week left in the legislative session, lawmakers and regulators want to resolve questions on how California will recoup its expenditures during power crisis.  After a summer of delays, California regulators and legislators are aiming in one final week to resolve issues crucial to millions of electricity customers and the financial stability of the state and its utilities.

The energy crisis that caused blackouts early this year has receded, but it has left behind a potential fiscal crisis. The state needs to recoup more than $8 billion that it has spent on power, and it has signed $43 billion in long-term electricity contracts.

Final plans for meeting these financial obligations--and spreading the pain of paying them off--have been debated for months. But the decision time has come: Legislators are scheduled to recess for the year on Friday, and the state Public Utilities Commission is under pressure to act on several long-pending measures at a meeting on Thursday. "What's before the state, both at the PUC and the Legislature, is how are we going to provide power to people in the years to come," PUC President Loretta M. Lynch said in an interview. "Are we going to have a healthy utility to provide the power, or are we going to rely on the state?"

The PUC, which approved the biggest rate increase in history earlier this year, now faces another tough choice: Should it surrender its formerly ironclad authority over electricity rates to the state Department of Water Resources, an agency that has come under fire for alleged conflicts of interest and the cost of its contracts? Or should it balk and jeopardize the state's planned sale of bonds to replenish the treasury and repay loans?

Legislation on Related Issues

Legislators are grappling with two complicated and highly contested bills on related issues. One seeks to repair the finances of Southern California Edison through a $2.9-billion aid plan backed by Gov. Gray Davis. The other would limit the powers of the Department of Water Resources, which has been buying electricity for 10 million customers of Edison, Pacific Gas & Electric Co. and San Diego Gas & Electric since January.

The state law that authorized the Department of Water Resources to buy power exempted the purchases from PUC reviews designed to protect consumers from unreasonable charges.

Now, the department is seeking a formal agreement with the PUC that would guarantee that its cost of supplying power to utility customers will be fully covered. Critics say the accord is a blank check for future rate increases, but the department says no increases will be necessary in the foreseeable future.

State officials say the PUC has little choice but to sign the agreement, which they see as necessary to reassure Wall Street bankers that the Department of Water Resources will be able to repay $12.5 billion in bonds the state plans to sell to cover power costs. The money from those bonds will go, in part, to repay the state treasury for money laid out for power.

Top state officials, including the governor and treasurer, want the bond sale to go without a hitch, but the date of the sale already has been pushed back several months, and threatened litigation could further delay it.

The urgency over the bonds comes about because the state already has used $6 billion from the treasury and has taken out a $4.3-billion loan to cover power costs.

State Treasurer Phil Angelides said that if the bonds are unsold and the economy slows down next year, the state could be revisiting the fiscal crisis of the early 1990s.

"People ought to be laying down their arms over their energy agendas and asking the question: What is the best and fastest way to repay the state general fund to ensure critical programs such as education and health get their funding?" he said.

Lynch, one of three Davis appointees on the five-member PUC, finds herself in a particularly difficult position. She sees the value of PUC reviews of the reasonableness of power purchases. But, Lynch said, "If we do not enter into a rate agreement, the bonds do not issue and that could affect the state general fund."

"The thing I care about most," she added, "is ensuring the general fund is repaid."

Earlier this month, Lynch issued a draft decision that would have the PUC essentially rubber-stamp any future revenue requests or rate increases sought by the Department of Water Resources. But she also has publicly endorsed a bill by state Sen. John Burton (D-San Francisco) that the Davis administration opposes.

The bill would ensure that the PUC has the right to scrutinize the revenue needs of the Department of Water Resources and hold public hearings. It would not, however, give the PUC the power to disallow department expenses. To reassure Wall Street, the bill would dedicate a portion of the money that utilities collect from their customers to repaying the bonds.

At a PUC meeting last Thursday, PUC commissioners Richard Bilas and Henry Duque, appointees of former Gov. Pete Wilson, voiced support for the Burton bill, saying it would let the PUC shed additional light on the Department of Water Resources' power-related expenditures.

The Davis administration opposes the bill's present form but is seeking amendments. One concern is that energy providers would sue out of fear that if money runs short, bondholders would be paid before they are.

The bill's passage could be a "deal breaker" for the bond sales, said contractor Joseph Fichera, a financial advisor to Davis.

At the least, contentious debate surrounding energy-related issues could drive up the price of floating bonds, Fichera said.

"Wall Street does not like risk. Conflict implies risk. So the more we create, the more we are costing ratepayers," he said.

The Legislature also is considering a bill that would allow Edison to sell bonds to pay off about three-quarters of the debt it accrued during the energy crisis. The utility would have to handle on its own about $1 billion owed to large energy companies. Consumer activists have threatened a ballot initiative to block the bill, which they call a bailout.

The PUC on Thursday is scheduled to vote on several items designed to ease the sale of the Department of Water Resources' bonds. One is a rate increase for SDG&E customers. Another measure would suspend the right of businesses and other electricity customers to stop buying electricity from their local utility and choose their own power provider.

The Alliance for Retail Energy Markets, an organization that includes many large California businesses, said its members would be forced to sue if the PUC goes ahead with plans to retroactively void the right of customers to choose their own energy providers.

But the most controversial item has been the proposed PUC agreement with the Department of Water Resources. Consumer groups and utilities alike have called for public examinations of the department's contracts and revenue requirements.

"The plan would allow a state agency to operate behind closed doors while it negotiates with ratepayers' money," said Douglas Heller of the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights in Santa Monica. "Secrecy in DWR leads to conflicts of interest and that leads to higher rates."

Concerns about the Department of Water Resources' lack of independent oversight have been heightened by recent developments:

Energy experts have questioned the qualifications of the trading team the department assembled, and several traders were fired for alleged conflicts of interest.

Critics seized on reports that the department sold surplus power at a loss of $46 million in July, although officials say surpluses are bound to occur with long-term power contracts.

And the department's projections of its revenue needs for future power purchases have been updated and amended twice, prompting utilities and others to question the reliability of the figures.

PG&E Threatens to Sue Over Revenue

The utilities want the department to be subject to the sort of reviews that have rankled them for years. If the PUC does not provide for that, lawsuits could be coming.

PG&E, which already is in bankruptcy, has threatened to sue if the Department of Water Resources' revenue requirement doesn't leave the utility a sufficient share of the rate increase adopted by state regulators in March.

PG&E recently asked a Sacramento County Superior Court judge to require the Department of Water Resources to hold public hearings on its revenue requirements. The company has reacted angrily to a draft PUC decision to shift $600 million of the state's cost of buying power from Edison to PG&E, saying the plan was illegal and discriminates against PG&E customers.

Davis aides have defended the Department of Water Resources and its power purchases, saying the department's long-term contracts helped cool the energy crisis.

"They look overpriced now," Fichera said. "But four months ago they were underpriced [compared with the spot market]. They are an insurance policy" against market volatility.

Having the PUC review actions of another state agency would be redundant and would serve no purpose, Fichera said, because the contracts already are in place.

"You can't break contracts," he said. "You've got to pay them."

Even some critics acknowledge it is difficult to evaluate the Department of Water Resources' performance to date. One reason is that the department has closely guarded details about its contracts and its spot purchases, arguing that release of too much information would place it at a competitive disadvantage.

Another reason is that market conditions have changed and natural gas prices have declined since the department entered into contracts amid the energy crisis.

"We all have 20-20 hindsight," said PUC Commissioner Bilas. "When DWR entered into contracts, the state was over the barrel. Now we can say that they are not as good as [the department] thought . . . and that DWR does a lousy job of negotiating contracts. But that's unfair."

<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>


> -----Original Message-----
> From: David And Melanie Hubbs [SMTP:dhubbs@telepak.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2000 8:54 PM
> To: Tom Malpass; Andrea Lazarus; Diane Martin & Ed Parry; Denise Batts
> Claflin; Randy & Missy Roberts; J Covington; Lamar & Sylvia Burrow; Helen
> Hamlett; Helen Hoffpauir; Ruth Long Cosby; Janet C. Gunnell; Jan and Pete
> Rodrigue; Alan Hubbs; Brett A. Hubbs; Lindsey Smith; Marge Smith; John &
> Jan Kleinpeter Ponson; Mary Kenelly
> Subject: Fw: You need pen and paper
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <LorenKlein@aol.com>
> To: <Ninidugas@aol.com>; <dhubbs@telepak.net>; <AAWK42@aol.com>;
> <cynthia.monsell@smna.com>; <scspell@huntnet.net>; <bob@buildfix.com>;
> <mwalker@sszblaw.com>; <chip@vedalabs.com>; <clandry2020@home.com>;
> <thunt@hga-llc.com>; <Laicatfish@aol.com>; <ClayKl@aol.com>;
> <AldKl@aol.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2000 1:48 PM
> Subject: You need pen and paper
>
>
> > OK - this takes a couple of minutes - but it's not a chain email and you
> will
> > really be surprised at the end.  Take the time to scroll through.
> >
> > >
> > > > > > * CHINESE NEW YEAR FOLLOW THE INSTRUCTIONS-
> > > >
> > > >> > > DO NOT CHEAT OR IT WON'T WORK AND YOU WILL WISH YOU HADN'T!
> > > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > Take 3 minutes and try this - it will freak you out.  The
> person
> > >who
> > > >
> > > >> > > sent
> > > >
> > > >> > > this said her wish came true 10 minutes after they read the
> mail.
> > > >
> > > >> > > But no cheating !!!!
> > > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > This game has a funny / creepy outcome.  Don't read ahead just
> do
> > >it.
> > > >
> > > >>It
> > > >
> > > >> > > takes about 3 minutes - Worth a try.
> > > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > First get pen and paper
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > When you finally choose names, make sure it's people
> > > >
> > > >> > > you actually know, and go with your first instincts!!!!!
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > > Scroll down one line at the time - don't read ahead or you'll
> > >ruin
> > > >
> > > >>the fun
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >>> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 1. First, write numbers 1 through 11 in a column
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >2. Then, beside numbers 1 and 2, write down any 2 numbers you want
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 3. Besides the 3 and 7, write down the names of members of the
> opposite
> > >sex
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > DON'T LOOK AHEAD OR IT WON'T TURN OUT RIGHT
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > 4. Write anyone's name ( like friends or family .....)
> > > >
> > > >> > > in the 4th, 5th, and 6th spot
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > > DON'T CHEAT OR YOU'LL BE UPSET THAT YOU DID
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 5. Write down four song titles in 8, 9, 10, and 11
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 6. Finally make a wish
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > > And here is the key of the game
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 1. You must tell (the number in space 2) people about this game
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2. The person in space 3 is the one you love
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 3. The person in 7 is one you like but can't work out
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 4. You care most about the person you put in 4
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 5. The person you name in number 5 is the one who knows you very
> well
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >6. The person you named in 6 is the your lucky star
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > 7. the song in 8 is the song that matches with the person in
> number
> > >3
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > 8. The title in 9 is the song for the person in 7
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > 9. The 10th space is the song that tells you most about your
> mind
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > 10. And 11 is the song telling how you feel about life
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >Send this to 10 people within the hour you read this.  If you do,
> your
> > >wish
> > > >will come true. If you don't it will become the opposite.
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> > > Bloody strange but it seems to work!!
> > > >
>


just in case you didn't see it- 4 broncos made the 1st team all decade team.
elway is the starter and your boy in sf didn't even make 2nd team tim.


By the way, the SRRS request to grant the following persons access to the
Financial Trading Agreements Database has been completed.

Mike

From: Tana Jones on 05/17/2000 08:58 AM
To: Michael Neves/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: New Master Swaps Agreements Database

can you give these three people in London Legal access to the Master Swap
Agreement Database.  Thanks.
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 05/17/2000 08:58 AM -----

	Sandra Freeman
	05/17/2000 04:52 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: New Master Swaps Agreements Database

Both Legal.

Rgds,

Sandra.

From: Tana Jones on 16/05/2000 13:08 CDT
To: Sandra Freeman/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: New Master Swaps Agreements Database

Are Micheal Khajeh-Hoori and Deepak Sitlani in Credit?  I know Michael Schuh
is in Legal.

	Sandra Freeman
	05/16/2000 11:37 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: New Master Swaps Agreements Database

Tana,

I have had a request from Michael Khajeh-Noori, Deepak Sitlani (London) and
Michael Schuh  (Frankfurt) to access to the NEW Master Swap Agreements
database, can you please confirm if they are allowed to access this database,
and if so what level of access they should have.

Thanks & Regards

Sandra Freeman
European Notes Administration


Frank:  FYI.  Let's tell her that we can execute the :

(1)  letter
(2)  the separate ISDA amendment
(3) our understanding (together with Vastar's) of the "old" guaranty.

I have a doctor's appointment at noon but I'll be back afterwards.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 03/08/2001 11:05 AM -----

	"Russell, Nicole" <nicole.russell@mirant.com>
	03/08/2001 10:08 AM

		 To: "'Sara.Shackleton@enron.com'" <Sara.Shackleton@enron.com>
		 cc: "Satterly, Kenneth" <ken.satterly@mirant.com>
		 Subject: ENRON MIRANT SOCO ISDA AMENDMENT LTR MIR LCMTS.DOC

 <<ENRON MIRANT SOCO ISDA AMENDMENT LTR MIR LCMTS.DOC>>

Sara,

I have a couple quick comments on the letter you sent this morning.  In
general, we need to make clear that we are replacing the credit support
provider under the ISDA.  Otherwise, I am concerned that we could face a
possible default under the ISDA once the VRI parental guaranty is
terminated. Otherwise, the letter looks very agreeable to me.  I am
anticipating we can get this executed today so please keep in touch with me
in regards to any further changes you would like to make.

Many thanks for all your help.

Best regards,

Nicole Russell

 - ENRON MIRANT SOCO ISDA AMENDMENT LTR MIR LCMTS.DOC


Dad:
Congrats on the press release.  People that found out about it were amazed
that we did it so quickly.  I was thinking, if you could call Ken, that would
be great.  I know Michael is talking to Dave, but talking to Ken would really
help my cause.  Let me know what you think.  I also am sending you a
presentation that you will really enjoy.
Regards,
Ben


I don't know when your brother is coming in, but there is a really good band
called rebirth brass band from new orleans playing at fitzgerald's on thurs.
nite if you are interested.

Anna Goldberg
Legal Affairs and Business Development
CompuBank, N.A.
(713)479-1058-phone
(713)479-1052-fax
agoldberg@compubank.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Matt.Smith@enron.com [mailto:Matt.Smith@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 12:04 PM
To: agoldberg@compubank.com
Subject: RE: FW: Sat night - the plan

Yup, my little bro is coming to visit.  We'll definitely be hitting the
town.  Are you around?  I may organize something, so I'll let you know.

Mat

agoldberg@compubank.com on 03/19/2001 11:48:27 AM

To:   Matt.Smith@enron.com
cc:

Subject:  RE: FW: Sat night - the plan

not back before the weekend.  Utah was great!  Tons of fresh powder and
good
weather.  Are you in town this weekend?

Anna Goldberg
Legal Affairs and Business Development
CompuBank, N.A.
(713)479-1058-phone
(713)479-1052-fax
agoldberg@compubank.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Matt.Smith@enron.com [mailto:Matt.Smith@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2001 10:42 AM
To: agoldberg@compubank.com
Subject: RE: FW: Sat night - the plan

Once again, I was out when you sent me mail.  I went to NYC for a long
weekend.  Had a great time, but I'm still exhausted.  Hope you're having a
great time in Utah.  If you get back before the weekend, drop me an email.

Mat

agoldberg@compubank.com on 03/09/2001 02:16:13 PM

To:   Matt.Smith@enron.com
cc:

Subject:  RE: FW: Sat night - the plan

Hey Mat- hope you enjoyed your time off.  I'm heading to Utah for some
skiing next week for a little break myself.  Anything going on tonight?

Anna Goldberg
Legal Affairs and Business Development
CompuBank, N.A.
(713)479-1058-phone
(713)479-1052-fax
agoldberg@compubank.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Matt.Smith@enron.com [mailto:Matt.Smith@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 7:18 AM
To: agoldberg@compubank.com
Subject: Re: FW: Sat night - the plan

Hey Anna,

Sorry, I took awhile getting back to you....I took the week off...

Ya, we tried meeting up, but I guess you guys must have left before we got
there.  Our dinner at Sambuca's took quite awhile, I think we made it to
Deans around 12:30 or so.  We checked there and the Hub, but no luck.  Hope
you guys had a good time, and I'm always up for another night out.

Mat

agoldberg@compubank.com on 02/22/2001 11:11:47 AM

To:   Matt.Smith@enron.com
cc:

Subject:  FW: Sat night - the plan

Matt- I don't know if you remember me, but we met at Jennifer's party at
the
Black Lab.  Thought we were meeting up with y'all last Sat, night, but I
guess we missed each other.  Maybe we can try it again sometime soon.  Hope
you had a fun night without us :)

anna

Anna Goldberg
Legal Affairs and Business Development
CompuBank, N.A.
(713)479-1058-phone
(713)479-1052-fax
agoldberg@compubank.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Jennifer.Bagwell@enron.com [mailto:Jennifer.Bagwell@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, February 16, 2001 9:43 AM
To: Scott.Baukney@enron.com; Massimo.Marolo@enron.com;
Reagan.Rorschach@enron.com; Matt.Smith@enron.com; Chuck.Ames@enron.com;
Tara.Piazze@enron.com; Susan.M.Scott@enron.com; Kristin.Quinn@enron.com;
Michelle.Wenz@enron.com; Steinunn.Thordardottir@enron.com; Swanson ,
Anne; Jackson.Logan@enron.com; agoldberg@compubank.com;
Jason.Thompkins@enron.com; Elizabeth.Johnston@enron.com
Subject: Sat night - the plan

Dean's is located on Main between Prairie and Preston.

---------------------- Forwarded by Jennifer Bagwell/NA/Enron on 02/16/2001
09:45 AM ---------------------------

 (Embedded     Enron North America Corp.
 image moved
 to file:      From:  Jennifer Bagwell
 pic13648.pcx) 02/16/2001 09:34 AM

To:   Scott Baukney/NA/Enron@Enron, Massimo Marolo/NA/Enron@Enron, Reagan
      Rorschach/NA/Enron@Enron, Matt Smith/NA/Enron@ENRON, Chuck
      Ames/NA/Enron@Enron, Tara Piazze/NA/Enron@ENRON, Susan M
      Scott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kristin Quinn/NA/Enron@Enron, Michelle
      Wenz/Corp/Enron@Enron, Steinunn Thordardottir/HOU/ECT@ECT, "Swanson ,
      Anne" <ASwans@coair.com>, Jackson Logan/HOU/ECT@ECT,
      agoldberg@compubank.com, Jason Thompkins/NA/Enron@Enron, Elizabeth
      Johnston/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject:  Sat night - the plan

Hello!  OK, for those of you who can make it (and I hope it will be all of
you), we are going to dinner at El Tiempo downtown (713-221-1695 @ Main &
Prairie) at 7:30 PM.  So, if you can make it to dinner, please come at 7:30
and we will reserve a big table.  If you can't make it to dinner, come to
El Tiempo for a margarita and then we will head over to Dean's after that.
Hope to see you all there!  And please feel free to invite others!  JB

If you need to reach me, my cell phone # is 713-417-8613.

(See attached file: pic13648.pcx)


I've started to transfer my Dow Jones e-mails into five separate folders
which can be found at:

P:\Scheduling\Dow Jones - Cob\Mead\Mid-C\NP-SP\Palo

You can already access February's files for each of these delivery points,
and prior months will be coming in soon as I have free moments in the day.

Thanks,
Kate

Cara Semperger
02/22/2001 08:15 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Dow Jones Index Prices - Database Access

Yeah, people are already asking me where the chart is already

c

   Kate Symes                02/22/2001 08:14 AM

To: Cara Semperger/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Dow Jones Index Prices - Database Access

Here's what I heard back from Tim. Do you want me to go ahead and save the
Dow Jones data to a shareable file in the meantime?

Kate
---------------------- Forwarded by Kate Symes/PDX/ECT on 02/22/2001 08:17 AM
---------------------------

TIM HEIZENRADER
02/21/2001 05:32 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Julie Sarnowski/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Dow Jones Index Prices - Database Access

I'm not exactly sure where the spreadsheet on our site comes from. Our
preference is to keep everything in our SQL Server database, and many of the
people that you mentioned have read access to that. When Julie Sarnowski gets
back from vacation next week, let's talk about uploading these data to the
server and providing a central facility for the floor.
Tim

   Kate Symes                02/21/2001 03:19 PM

To: Tim Heizenrader/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Cara Semperger/PDX/ECT@ECT

Subject: Dow Jones Index Prices - Database Access

I'd like to inquire about the Dow Jones index price database currently being
maintained by the Fundamentals group. It's come to my attention - by virtue
of the fact that I receive the Dow Jones data each afternoon - that several
people are interested in having access to those figures. I've had requests
from mid-marketing, trading, and scheduling, and am working with IT to put
the NP-15 and SP-15 data online. Cara Semperger, in particular, relies on the
index prices in order to run one of her reports.

I'm wondering if it  would be possible to give these people access to your
database, or maybe if your group would benefit from the data I receive. Your
spreadsheet looks like a compilation of the documents I receive from Dow
Jones, and one might be more useful for an individual or group than the
other. I don't have a preference either way - I'm more than happy to compile
the reports in a separate folder. Please let me know what works best for you.
(I sit in the middle of the room between Tracy Ngo and Val Sabo.)

Thanks,
Kate


Tracy,

Confirming the meeting tomorrow, Thursday,  1:30p.m.

Vince Kaminski


Hey,

I keep hearing negative things about Lord of the Rings. Any desire to see In
the Bedroom. It's a thriller with Sissy Spacek. I've heard good things about
it. Or The Shipping News with Kevin Spacey. This is a drama. I think I'd
prefer the thriller myself.

In the Bedroom is playing at the Edwards near you at 1:30pm.

What do you think?

Mandi