Not really, but some of the others do :)

Nick Hiemstra
10/17/2000 08:32 AM
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Game Tomorrow @ 7

Yeah, yeah, I know.  I already apologized and it won't happen again.  Once
again, sorry I wrote down the wrong time.  I'll be there at 6:30 this week.

- nh

P.S. Do you really have better things to do?

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Eric Bass                           10/17/2000 08:23 AM

To: Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT, Timothy Blanchard/HOU/EES@EES, Jeffrey C
Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kenneth Shulklapper/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nick
Hiemstra/HOU/ECT@ECT, Luis Mena/NA/Enron@Enron, Amir Ahanchian/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Brian Hoskins/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications
cc:
Subject: Game Tomorrow @ 7

Contrary to popular belief, the people that actually show up to the game do
have other things they can do if they know that the other team members will
not show up.  So, let me know whether or not you will be there.


Embedded in attached Westlaw e-mail.
Received: from pdx-navgate.stoel.com ([172.16.1.78]) by wpsmtp.stoel.com;
Thu, 17 May 2001 12:01:47 -0700
Received: from stoel.com ([172.16.255.4]) by pdx-navgate.stoel.com (NAVIEG
2.1 bld 63) with SMTP id M2001051712065507541 ; Thu, 17 May 2001 12:06:55
-0700
Received: from lethbridge.westlaw.com ([163.231.254.96]) by gateway.stoel.com
with ESMTP id <118123>; Thu, 17 May 2001 12:07:23 -0700
Received: from EG-DLVRY-B06.westlan.com (eg-dlvry-b06.westlan.com
[172.16.5.19]) by lethbridge.westlaw.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id OAA20558
for <pgboylston@stoel.com>; Thu, 17 May 2001 14:05:20 -0500
From: Westlaw@westgroup.com
Message-Id: <200105171905.OAA20558@lethbridge.westlaw.com>
To: pgboylston@stoel.com
Subject: Westlaw Email
Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 19:05:21 -0600-UT
Reply-to: Support@westgroup.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=_316B0B4B.6D0C7DE0"

(C) 2001 West Group. Copyright is not claimed as to any part of the original
work prepared by a U.S. government officer or employee as part of that
person's official duties. All rights reserved. Use of the Westlaw data
delivered to your e-mail address is governed by the Westlaw Subscriber
Agreement or such other agreement as may govern your use of Westlaw data .

 - Westlaw_Document_14_05_05_336.doc
 - Summary_14_05_04_336.doc


Assemblyman Rod Wright held a meeting today to discuss the following
legislative activities:

Governor Davis has become energized this week and is actively
negotiating with the IOUs.

QF legislation will be heard next week.  The legislation should codify
the payment formula which was developed over the past several weeks
during negotiations between the IOUs and QFs.  The legislation will not
address how the QFs will actually be paid, and it will specify that no
payment will come from the DWR.

Assemblyman Wright hopes to move a stripped down version of ABX 18 next
week to address the IOU under collection.  A sticking point is
determining what type of security the state will take, hydroelectric,
transmission or warrants.  He also intends to hear various interruptable
service measures.

Senator Debra Bowen is scheduled to hear SBX 5, the $1.2 billion dollar
energy efficiency measure, and SBX 33, the California Transmission
Corporation measure.  This is subject to change.


Cliff:
Do you have Dierdre's address in NYC.  Megan and I are staying there next
weekend and are getting picked up at the airport and need to tell the driver
where were going.  How is everything going?  Slow down the traveling yet?
Make sure you include yourself in the Turkey Run on Thanksgiving in Chicago.
Talk to you soon.
Ben


We are reducing our nom into Eastrans eff 3/18/2000 to
72,000 MMBtu/d.  Redeliveries are 50 MMcf/d into PG & E, 7 from FCV,
3 into your Cartwheel @ Carthage, and 12 into Mobil Beaumont..


Don,
  Hope you had a great weekend.  Last time we had spoke,  I inquired about sitting with someone on your desk after work.    I hope the invitation is still open.  I would like to come up sometime this week, if possible.  As I mentioned before, I am really interested in power and working nights.  If you have any objections, please let me know.

Thank you !

Zarin Imam


i am going with work.  another boondoggle.


Our play toys nurture creative spirits.

Remember what it was like to be a kid? You just couldn't
grow up fast enough. Things haven't changed--your kids love
to pretend they're just like you. In fact, chances are they're
already imitating the things you do around the house. Playing
with Dad's tools and dressing up in Mom's clothes are all a
natural part of growing up.

The best toys for imaginative play are ones that encourage
kids to try out these new roles in a way that's safe and fun.
Our Workbench Desk and Tool Kit let children pretend to fix
things, and a Vanity Table and Makeup Kit make it fun to dress
up for that special tea party.

Go directly to the following items:

Workbench Desk
http://service.potterybarnkids.com/2652935.14673.0.3163

Tool Kit
http://service.potterybarnkids.com/2652935.14673.0.3164

Vanity Table
http://service.potterybarnkids.com/2652935.14673.0.3165

Makeup Kit
http://service.potterybarnkids.com/2652935.14673.0.3166

Visit our Featured Gifts section
http://service.potterybarnkids.com/2652935.14673.0.3167

Or, view our entire collection of play toys
http://service.potterybarnkids.com/2652935.14673.0.3168

Shop potterybarnkids.com
http://service.potterybarnkids.com/2652935.14673.0.3169

Catalog Quickshop
http://service.potterybarnkids.com/2652935.14673.0.3170

Store Locator
http://service.potterybarnkids.com/2652935.14673.0.3171

If you prefer not to receive email messages from us, please reply
to this message with 'remove' as the subject line. Your name will
be removed from our email list.

Privacy Guarantee: Pottery Barn Kids supports and adheres to the
guidelines and practices adopted by the Direct Marketing
Association's "Privacy Promise to American Consumers."

Copyright 2001 Pottery Barn Kids. All rights reserved.


Hi John,
Here is a detailed summary of all the payments we've made to you.  Please
call me if you need clarification.
Janice
974-6936


---------------------------------------------------

The information contained in this message from
Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP and any attachments
is confidential and intended only for the named
recipient(s).  If you have received this message
in error, you are prohibited from copying,
distributing or using the information.  Please
contact the sender immediately by return email
and delete the original message.

Attached?are Comments of the California Manufacturers & Technology
Association on Proposed Decision - I.99-07-003.? This is a Word
2000?document.
?
?
?
Jody Smith
Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP
1275 Pennsylvania  Avenue
Washington, DC? 20004
202.383.0113
202.637.3593  Fax
 - COMMENTS.DOC


Vince- I spoke with London just now.
Here is what I gather Vuthy said about Howard Haughton.
********************************************************
1. He wants a second-round (another interview with Enron)- but, with high
officials (Senior Management, this time).

2. He didn't think the interviewers were understanding his technical
abilities and language.

********************************************************
Good News: He (Howard) wants to come back for another interview. I was lead
to believe it went well although, Howard believes in protocol.

Bad News: Howard in on vacation now for 10 days.

Sounds fairly good on the candidate debrief.

Thanks, Vince.
Jeff
949 813 2241

*  Get free, secure online email at http://www.ziplip.com/  *


Scott Clark
Houston Chronicle
801 texas Avenue
Houston Texas 77002

713 220 6872 fax: 713 220 7273


Request Complete for 10-04-01 & 10-05-01.

      Albert Escamilla (Global Counterparty)
          X 3(7578)

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lebrocq, Wendi
Sent:	Friday, October 05, 2001 4:53 PM
To:	Lambert, Karen; Jones, Tana; Schott, Samuel; Brackett, Debbie R.; Clark, Cynthia; Enron Europe Global CounterParty,; Sever, Stephanie; Moran, Tom; Clark, Claudia; Bradford, William S.; Lees, Lisa; Fayett, Juana; Morse, Jana; Le, Trang; Maley, Paul; O'day, Karen; Rohauer, Tanya; Lombardi, Kelly; Lindsay, Brian; EOL Call Center; Hare, Bill D.; Heffernan, Amy; Lafuze, Molly; Clark, Danny; Panus, Stephanie; Mandola, Teresa; Ebow, Amber; Coleman, Tandra; Campbell, Lesli; Lebrocq, Wendi; Taylor, Mark E (Legal); Lauer, Kara; Banner, Kimberly; Mcquade, Jennifer; George, Fraisy; Guillory, Michael; Rajaram, Aparna; Monterrey, Maribel; Lebeau, Maria; Escamilla, Albert; Curry, Ken
Subject:	EOL and Clickpaper Approvals: 10-5-01

Please see attached.

 << File: EOL 10-05-01.xls >>
Regards,

Wendi LeBrocq
3-3835


At the October 24, 2001, FERC Sunshine meeting, the following items were discussed:

Kern River Firm Customers' Rehearing Request Denied (C-6, C-8 on agenda):

Called by Linda Breathitt, these are two Kern River expansion applications [CA. Action Project, CP01-69; 2002 Expansion, CP01-106] that have received certificates.  The draft orders deny rehearing requests by Firm Customers who charge that additions will cause further  pro rata allocations at Wheeler Ridge.  The draft order states that the benefits of the project outweigh "any potential adverse impact to existing customers?" and that "the solution to the problem of pro rata curtailments at Wheeler Ridge lies not with interstate pipelines, but with resolving the problems of take-away capacity on SoCalGas?."  Hence, the orders reason that Kern River has satisfied its obligations to its customers, and the current lack of intrastate capacity "cannot be laid at [Kern River's] door."

Breathitt is filing concurrences to these two orders to highlight the important issue of FERC's response to intervener allegations of insufficient take-away capacity related to interstate expansions.  Though Breathitt doesn't dissent from the rehearing denial, she wants to underscore the importance of the Commissions' acknowledgement of the role that possible degradation of existing rights plays in the determination of the public need and necessity for pipeline expansions.  She also states that she is "uneasy" about FERC's "strident policies" in favor of adding pipeline facilities despite possible inefficiencies and constraints, and she reiterates that FERC's mandate under the NGA goes beyond making sure pipeline gets into the ground.  She notes that the Commission will revisit the take-away capacity issue in another Kern River expansion application, CP01-422 [2003 Expansion Project].

Brownell Calls for Development of Regional State Relations Panels under Auspice of "Electricity Market Design and Structure" NOPR, RM01-12 (E-5 on agenda)

Though  the issuance of a NOPR is not apparently imminent, under this discussion item Nora Brownell announced that she has sent a memo to the other three Commissioners recommending the development of some internal structure to coordinate communications between FERC and state commissions.  The need for such coordination emerged from obvious frustration expressed by state commissioners during RTO Week.  To get this process going, Commissioner Brownell asked staff to pursue a structure, perhaps a type of regional panel, with the mission to strengthen federal/sate relationships.  Considering the magnitude of RTO development, FERC likely will need to have dedicated staff work on this.  Chairman Wood requested that Dan Larcamp, Director of OMTR, bring a proposal to the Commission at the next meeting on how to implement a structure.  While all three other Commissioners supported Brownell's proposal, Commissioner Massey noted that there's already been seven years of "process" and input on RTO formation and that any new structure should be developed "in a way that gets us to an endgame" concretely and clearly.

Western Infrastructure Reports Lay Baseline for FERC Adequacy Conference in Seattle

Staff presented multiple detailed reports on data and background material gathered to lay the groundwork for discussions at next month's Western Infrastructure Adequacy Conference in Seattle on November 2 [similar conferences will be held regionally across the country].    The conference is a FERC "fact-finding mission" which will seek to answer three primary questions:
(1)		Is the current energy infrastructure in the West adequate?
(2)	What are the infrastructure needs for the region?
(3)	What factors inhibit investment in the development of adequate energy infrastructure?

While the presentations seem to focus primarily on electric transmission, the conference will cover all energy delivery systems.  The overriding question on all fronts is what needs to be done, and who needs to do it.  The powerpoint presentations made by Staff are already available on FERC's website at <http://www.ferc.gov/calendar/commissionmeetings/discussion_papers.htm>

"RTO Week" Update

Staff updated the Commissioners and public on the week of RTO panels held at FERC last week.  Staff is preparing and organizing a document outlining "what Staff heard," which will be posted on FERC's website this week.  The document is intended to give focus to reply comments from stakeholders.  Staff also suggested that there may be a need to hold smaller, more focused Staff sessions to "dig deeper?."  According to Staff, while there seemed to be some consensus at the 10.000 mile high level, more specific issues emerged which may require further discussion.

Lengthy Updates and Discussion on Two RTO Mediations (Southeast, Northeast), Midwest RTO Progress

In the Northeast and Southeast RTO mediation cases, Staff and the mediating Judges briefed the Commissioners on where the ordered mediations left off, what proposals and options are now on the table, and what next steps may be necessary.  These mediation reports will be available online (by end of week).  What is not clear is when the Commission is going to vote on RTOs - there were no votes at the meeting, only discussion.

In the Midwest, both MISO and ARTO are ready for operations, and MISO and SPP are also prepared to merge.  While Commissioners discussed specifics of all the Midwest proposals, again no vote was taken or any indication given as to when a vote may occur.

ETS Draft Orders Issued:

?	Northern Natural, RP00-223-005:  Northern's Limited Firm Transportation ["LFT"] tariff sheets were approved, including two additional LFT sheets concerning the Carlton surcharge.
?	Calypso, CP01-444-000:  Letters issued to Secretary of State, Secretary of Defense requesting review of draft Presidential Permit for Calypso to construct, own and operate pipeline facilities at the boundary of the U.S. Exclusive Economic Zone [EEZ] and the Bahamas EEZ.


Here is the new Value tabs for the Genco Valuation model.  The start payment/
turbine has not been changed and a I am working with Kevin Presto to get this
nailed down.  Evergything else is up to date.  I am doing a check on all the
property tax numbers.  Thanks
Ben


Thanks for the message!  It was a complete victory!   Mark


Lech -- As to the below, yes, please file as to the named AEP Operating Companies, which are each utilities involved in the production of electricity.  I attach a copy of the latest format of the agreement, and bring to your attention certain new parties shown in the first paragraph and as signatories, mostly U.K. and Canadian entities.  A newly listed U.S. AEP affiliate is Houston Pipe Line Company LP.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Lech Kalembka" <Lech.Kalembka@cwt.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Saturday, November 10, 2001 5:51 PM
To:	Portz, David
Cc:	Heard, Marie; Cook, Mary; David Mitchell
Subject:	RE: AEP Master Netting Agr

Although formally only two AEP entities are party to the MNA, AEPSC is
acting as agent for a number of affiliates.  This raises, to my mind at
least, the possibility that those subsidiaries would be considered the real
"debtors" for UCC purposes.

Accordingly, I believe the prudent course is to file against each named
subsidiary, as well as against  AEPSC and AEPSI.  To do so, we will need
the subsidiaries' respective addresses, jurisdictions of organization and
"organizational ID" number (if organized in Colorado, Delaware, Maryland or
Texas), and confirmation that each is, as certainly appears to be the case,
a "transmitting utility" under the UCC, i.e., an entity primarily engaged
in the production or transmission of electricity or the transmission of
goods through a pipeline.

Thank you.

Lech Kalembka
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft
100 Maiden Lane
New York, NY  10038
Tel.: (212) 504-6918
Fax: (212) 504-6666
E-mail: lech.kalembka@cwt.com

                    "Portz,
                    David"               To:
                    <David.Portz@        <lech.kalembka@cwt.com>
                    ENRON.com>           cc:     "Heard, Marie"
                    Office:              <Marie.Heard@ENRON.com>,
                                         "Cook, Mary"
                    11/05/2001           <Mary.Cook@ENRON.com>
                    05:27 PM             Subject:     RE: AEP Master
                                         Netting Agr

Jurisdictions of incorporation:

          American Electric Power Service Corporation:  New York

          AEP Energy Services, Inc:  Ohio

>  -----Original Message-----
> From:   Cook, Mary
> Sent:   Monday, November 05, 2001 4:16 PM
> To:     'lech.kalembka@cwt.com'; Heard, Marie
> Cc:     Portz, David; Sager, Elizabeth
> Subject:     RE: AEP Master Netting Agr
>
> Do not do the searches, but do the filings for our benefit.
>
>     -----Original Message-----
>    From:     "Lech Kalembka" <Lech.Kalembka@cwt.com>@ENRON
>    Sent:     Monday, November 05, 2001 4:08 PM
>    To:  Heard, Marie
>    Cc:  Portz, David; Sager, Elizabeth; Cook, Mary
>    Subject:  RE: AEP Master Netting Agr
>
>
>    Should we file?  Thanks.
>
>    Lech Kalembka
>    Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft
>    100 Maiden Lane
>    New York, NY  10038
>    Tel.: (212) 504-6918
>    Fax: (212) 504-6666
>    E-mail: lech.kalembka@cwt.com
>
>
>
>                        "Heard,
>                        Marie"               To:
> <Lech.Kalembka@cwt.com>
>                        <Marie.Heard@        cc:     "Sager,
> Elizabeth"
>                        ENRON.com>
> <Elizabeth.Sager@ENRON.com>,
>                        Office:              "Portz, David"
>
> <David.Portz@ENRON.com>, "Cook,
>                        11/05/2001           Mary"
> <Mary.Cook@ENRON.com>
>                        05:04 PM             Subject:     RE: AEP
> Master
>                                             Netting Agr
>
>
>
>
>
>
>    Lech:
>
>    I just spoke with Elizabeth Sager and she said there was no need
> to
>    order lien searches for AEP as the contract expires in March,
> 2002.
>
>    Marie
>
>    Marie Heard
>    Senior Legal Specialist
>    Enron North America Corp.
>    Phone:  (713) 853-3907
>    Fax:  (713) 646-3490
>    marie.heard@enron.com
>
>    >  -----Original Message-----
>    > From:   "Lech Kalembka" <Lech.Kalembka@cwt.com>@ENRON
>    > Sent:   Monday, November 05, 2001 3:28 PM
>    > To:     Portz, David
>    > Cc:     Heard, Marie
>    > Subject:     RE: AEP Master Netting Agr
>    >
>    >
>    > I did receive the document.  Should I contact anyone, or am I
> awaiting
>    > a
>    > call to discuss/negotiate?  Thanks.
>    >
>    > Lech Kalembka
>    > Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft
>    > 100 Maiden Lane
>    > New York, NY  10038
>    > Tel.: (212) 504-6918
>    > Fax: (212) 504-6666
>    > E-mail: lech.kalembka@cwt.com
>    >
>    >
>    >
>    >                     David.Portz@e
>    >                     nron.com             To:
> Lech.Kalembka@cwt.com
>    >                     Office:              cc:
> Marie.Heard@enron.com
>    >                                          Subject:     RE: AEP
> Master
>    >                     11/05/2001           Netting Agr
>    >                     04:17 PM
>    >
>    >
>    >
>    >
>    >
>    >
>    > Lech -- Please let me know if you did not receive the
> attachment via
>    > my
>    > subsequent e-mail.  I understand the UCC searches and filings
> to be
>    > needed
>    > in relation to the attachment's Section 6(b).  Upon completion
> of
>    > negotiations, I will send you an electronic copy of the
> finalized
>    > Netting
>    > and Setoff Agreement to faciliate Cadwalader's preparation of
> the
>    > financing
>    > statement filings.  --David Portz
>    >
>    >     -----Original Message-----
>    >    From:   "Lech Kalembka" <Lech.Kalembka@cwt.com>@ENRON
>    >    Sent:   Monday, November 05, 2001 2:54 PM
>    >    To:     Portz, David
>    >    Subject:  Re: AEP Master Netting Agr
>    >
>    >
>    >    I did not find an attachment.  Also, I assume that we will
> prepare
>    > UCC
>    >    filings and order UCC searches.  Thank you.
>    >
>    >    Lech Kalembka
>    >    Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft
>    >    100 Maiden Lane
>    >    New York, NY  10038
>    >    Tel.: (212) 504-6918
>    >    Fax: (212) 504-6666
>    >    E-mail: lech.kalembka@cwt.com
>    >
>    >
>    >
>    >                        "Portz,
>    >                        David"               To:
>    > <Lech.Kalembka@cwt.com>
>    >                        <David.Portz@        cc:     "Sager,
> Elizabeth"
>    >                        ENRON.com>
>    > <Elizabeth.Sager@ENRON.com>,
>    >                        Office:              "Heard, Marie"
>    >
> <Marie.Heard@ENRON.com>,
>    > "Cook,
>    >                        11/05/2001           Mary"
>    > <Mary.Cook@ENRON.com>,
>    >                        03:32 PM             "Williams, Jason R
>    > (Credit)"
>    >
>    > <Jason.R.Williams@ENRON.com>
>    >                                             Subject:     AEP
> Master
>    > Netting
>    >                                             Agr
>    >
>    >
>    >
>    >
>    >
>    >    Lech - A high priority Master Netting and Setoff Agreement
> (see
>    >    attached) is in the late stages of negotiation with the
>    > below-referenced
>    >    AEP affiliates.  The agreement is currently intended to be
> limited
>    > to
>    >    masters/ transactions between ENA &/or EPMI and two major
> AEP
>    > trading
>    >    affiliates, American Electric Power Service Corporation as
> Agent
>    > for the
>    >    AEP Operating Companies ("AEP") and AEP Energy Services,
> Inc.
>    >    ("AEPESI").  The Netting Agreement explicitly identifies
> enabling
>    >    agreements between those entities relating to trading
> physical gas,
>    >    physical power, and financial swaps.  Earlier today the
> Enron
>    > Credit
>    >    group indicated that ENA trades (using GTCs) physical coal
> and
>    > physical
>    >    synfuel with American Electric Power Service Corporation.
> Please
>    >    contact me with any questions. -- David
>    >
>    >    David A. Portz
>    >    Senior Counsel
>    >    Enron North America Corp.
>    >    1400 Smith, EB 3805a
>    >    Houston, Texas  77002-7361
>    >
>    >    Phone:   713-853-9239
>    >    Fax:  713-646-3491
>    >    Assistant:   Linda Simmons (Ext. 57851)
>    >
>    >
>    >
>    >
>    >
>    >
> **********************************************************************
>    >    This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its
> relevant
>    > affiliate
>    >    and may contain confidential and privileged material for
> the sole
>    > use of
>    >    the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution
> or
>    > disclosure
>    >    by
>    >    others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
>    > recipient (or
>    >    authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact
> the sender
>    > or
>    >    reply to Enron Corp. at
> enron.messaging.administration@enron.com
>    > and
>    >    delete
>    >    all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments
> hereto)
>    > are
>    >    not
>    >    intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not
> create or
>    > evidence
>    >    a
>    >    binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or
> any of its
>    >    affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party,
> and may
>    > not
>    >    be
>    >    relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel
> or
>    > otherwise.
>    >    Thank you.
>    >
>    >
> **********************************************************************
>    >
>    >
>    >
>    >
>    >
>    >
> ======================================================================
>    > ========
>    >
>    >    NOTE:  The information in this email is confidential and
> may be
>    > legally
>    >    privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, you
> must not
>    > read,
>    >    use or disseminate the information.  Although this email
> and any
>    >    attachments are believed to be free of any virus or other
> defect
>    >    that might affect any computer system into which it is
> received and
>    >    opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure
> that it
>    > is
>    >    virus free and no responsibility is accepted by Cadwalader,
>    > Wickersham
>    >    & Taft for any loss or damage arising in any way from its
> use.
>    >
>    >
>    >
>    >
> ======================================================================
>    > ========
>    >
>    >
>    >
>    >
>    >
>    >
>    >
>    >
> ======================================================================
>    > ========
>    > NOTE:  The information in this email is confidential and may
> be
>    > legally privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient,
> you must
>    > not read, use or disseminate the information.  Although this
> email and
>    > any attachments are believed to be free of any virus or other
> defect
>    > that might affect any computer system into which it is
> received and
>    > opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure
> that it is
>    > virus free and no responsibility is accepted by Cadwalader,
> Wickersham
>    > & Taft for any loss or damage arising in any way from its use.
>    >
>    >
>    >
> ======================================================================
>    > ========
>    >
>
>
>
>
>
> ======================================================================
> ========
>    NOTE:  The information in this email is confidential and may be
> legally privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, you must
> not read, use or disseminate the information.  Although this email and
> any attachments are believed to be free of any virus or other defect
>    that might affect any computer system into which it is received
> and opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that
> it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by Cadwalader,
> Wickersham
>    & Taft for any loss or damage arising in any way from its use.
>
>
>
> ======================================================================
> ========
>

==============================================================================
NOTE:  The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, you must not read, use or disseminate the information.  Although this email and any attachments are believed to be free of any virus or other defect
that might affect any computer system into which it is received and opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by Cadwalader, Wickersham
& Taft for any loss or damage arising in any way from its use.

==============================================================================


no.  i just don't want your sister in law telling these guys that i said
that.  could ruin my rep.  you coming over at 730?


pls print.  thanks df
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 08/07/2000
09:21 AM ---------------------------

Frazier King
08/04/2000 04:44 PM
To: Eric Benson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Janet Butler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Shelley
Corman/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Philip Crowley/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dari
Dornan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Staci
Holtzman/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Lee Huber/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Frazier
King/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Candace Kyle/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dorothy
McCoppin/FGT/Enron@Enron, Michael Moran/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Maria
Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Tony Pryor/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Colleen
Raker/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bret Reich/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kathy
Ringblom/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Louis
Soldano/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jim Talcott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kim
Wilkie/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Power Point Presentation

Here is Mark Haedicke's eCommerce powerpoint presentation which he will make
next Friday at the Energy Bar Luncheon.  It look's like it will be VERY
good.  If you do not have a form to submit your reservations, let me know and
I will have Janet make you a copy.  The deadline is next Tuesday.

---------------------- Forwarded by Frazier King/FGT/Enron on 08/04/2000
04:40 PM ---------------------------

Brenda Whitehead@ECT
08/04/2000 02:04 PM
To: Frazier King/FGT/Enron@ENRON
cc: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Power Point Presentation

per the request of Mark Taylor, please see this attachment:


Folks-
At today's meeting, those Group members who attended agreed that we should
indeed send the letter with changes reflecting the new legislation. Attached
is the newest draft of such a letter. We need to send this letter out FRIDAY
so in order to do that please look over the letter carefully and let me know
if your organization wishes to be included as a signatory. I need every set
of eyes out there to look this letter over for spelling, grammar and
content -- my eyes have seen it too many times and are apt to miss things.
So, here is the process ---

Let me know of any minor changes ASAP. If there are content changes please
email them to the ENTIRE group for sign off. Please understand that we want
to send this FRIDAY so we do not have a lot of time to make changes. When I
have a final draft I will ask people to fax signatures or send originals to
me by Friday.Thank you all for your help with this letter. We could not have
done it with out you.

We will be scheduling our next general meeting for mid October. Also, we
have finalized the dates for the Annual Retreat and will be sending out
packets with all the details next week. DJ and I are working on the agenda
so if you have a specific topic you would like covered please let us know.
As always, please send me an email or give me a call if you have any
concerns or questions about the letter or any other matter.

Thanks,
Delaney

 - ltr to governor -- options list.doc


Please note that tag number 11863 was canceled and 11870 has been created in
it's place.

Thanks,
Stacy
---------------------- Forwarded by Stacy Runswick/PDX/ECT on 11/17/2000
03:08 PM ---------------------------
   Stacy Runswick                11/17/2000 11:43 AM

To: Portland Shift
cc: John M Forney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cara Semperger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Mark
Fischer/PDX/ECT@ECT, Tom Alonso/PDX/ECT@ECT, Lisa Gang/PDX/ECT@ECT

Subject: ATTENTION!! Possible Derate on the Devers line for Monday Nov. 20th

It was rumoured by Reliant that there is a possibility the Devers line will
derate on Monday, Nov. 20th.  AZPS was unable to confirm this rumour and
stated that they will post the information on their web site Saturday, Nov.
18th.  We think the Devers line will be derated on Monday hrs. ending 10-16.
There has been no word about the N. Gilla line.  Because this rumour could
not be confirmed, we had to schedule as normal for that day.  For your
convenience I have supplied a list below of all the TAGS I have done for PV
Heavyload on Monday that may be effected.   Good Luck.

Stacy

EPMI TAG NUMBERS


1. &Ancillary Services8 or &AS8 means those services required by Entergy,s
interconnection agreement with MDEA or Entergy,s tariff.
OR
&Ancillary Services8 or &AS8 means those services recognized by Entergy,s
interconnect agreement with MDEA or Entergy,s tariff.
2.&Available Energy8 means Energy that is available for sale on any given day
that is in excess of MDEA,s Native Load.
OR
&Available Energy8 means Energy that is available for sale on any given day
that is in excess of (i) MDEA,s Native Load, and (ii) the Energy required to
be sold under any Existing Transactions, up to the total amount of Energy on
any day that can be produced from the Facilities.
3.&Available Energy8 means Energy that is available for sale on any given day
that is in excess of MDEA,s Native Load.
OR
&Available Energy8 means Energy that is available for sale on any given day
that is in excess of (i) MDEA,s Native Load, and (ii) the Energy required to
be sold under any Existing Transactions, up to the total amount of Energy on
any day that can be produced from the Facilities.
4.&Confirmation8 means a confirmation of a transaction or transactions.
OR
&Confirmation8 means the document provided for under the MPPSA or the MGPSA
and with the corresponding third party under a Back-to-Back Transaction or
with EPMI which specifies the Product being bought or sold, the duration of
the Transaction and the other terms, including price. A daily report of all
hourly (or similarly short term) purchases and sales will be provided to the
Customer and shall serve as a Confirmation for those transactions under the
MPPSA or MGPSA.
5.&Delivery Point8 means the busbar of the respective Facilities located at
the interconnection between CPUC,s and YCPSC,s respective transmission
systems at the 115 kV switching station at the respective interconnections
with the Entergy transmission system.
Or
&Delivery Point8 &Point of Delivery8 or &POD8 means (a) for power (i) the
interfaces  located at the interconnection between Clarksdale and Yazoo City
transmission systems at the  Entergy system, or (ii) the point specified in
any Back-to-Back Transaction, EPMI Transaction or Structured Transaction at
which Products are to be tendered under a Confirmation; (b) for natural gas,
(i) for Clarksdale, the point of interconnection between Texas Gas and
Clarksdale (ii) for Yazoo City, the interconnection between Southern Natural
Gas (Sonat) and Mississippi Valley Gas for the Yazoo City Power Plant (the
Sonat Delivery Point) (iii) the interconnection between Mississippi Valley
Gas (MVG) and the Yazoo City Power Plant (MVG Delivery Point), (iv) any point
where fuel is delivered as specified in a Fuel Transaction.
6.&Incentive Fee8 means forty percent (40%) of the Savings and of the net
profit from external sales of the Cities, natural gas resources and the
purchase of on-peak Energy, as calculated in accordance with Article III of
this ILA.
Or
&Incentive Fee8 means the fee described in [Section].
7.&Market Price8 is the price agreed by the parties to be paid by EPMI in any
EPMI Transaction for the sale of Energy to third parties, or the amount to be
paid to EPMI for the sale of Energy to the Cities and/or MDEA.
or
&Market Price8 is the price agreed to (i) by any third party for the sale or
purchase to or from EPMI or MDEA in a Back-to-Back Transaction, (ii) the
price paid by EPMI in any EPMI Transaction or (iii) by any third party
pursuant to any Structured Transaction.
8. &Protocols8 shall mean the SPP Protocols duly adopted by SPP, including
any attachments or exhibits referenced thereby, as amended from time to time,
containing the scheduling, operating, planning, reliability, and settlement
(including customer registration) policies, rules, guidelines, procedures,
standards, and criteria of SPP.  For the purposes of determining
responsibilities and rights at a given time, the Protocols, as amended in
accordance with the change procedure(s) described in the Protocols, in effect
at the time of the performance or non-performance of an action, shall govern
with respect to that action.
or
&Protocols8 shall mean the Protocols duly adopted by SPP, SERC, NERC, and/or
Entergy, including any attachments or exhibits referenced thereby, as amended
from time to time, containing the scheduling, operating, planning,
reliability, and settlement (including customer registration) policies,
rules, guidelines, procedures, standards, and operations criteria.  For the
purposes of determining responsibilities and rights at a given time, the
Protocols, as amended in accordance with the change procedure(s) described in
the Protocols, in effect at the time of the performance or non-performance of
an action, shall govern with respect to that action.
9.&Savings8 shall mean the difference between 1) the total costs to MDEA
and/or the Cities of a Transaction, and 2) the total costs of MDEA and/or the
Cities avoided or displaced by the Transaction, which difference shall be
calculated as described in Article III of this ILA.
not defined in rev 23 definitions


As requested, attached is the Top Goals & Actions for ENA Government Affairs
support to be handed out at Rick's meeting.

Jim


John,

I appreciated your help.  I'm glad we got to do a real deal, even if it was a
strange one.  More to come!

I'll check on the sitter, but dinner on the 2nd sounds great.

Kay

"Keffer, John" <JKeffer@KSLAW.com> on 01/18/2001 03:54:44 PM
To: "C. Kay Mann (E-mail)" <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Dinner

Kay-thanks again for the opportunity to work with ENA on the InterGEn deal-I
hope you were satisfied with us.

Could you and Neil come to our house for dinner on Feb. 2?

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.


Genia

Just to be sure we are working with the "latest form" of Enron guaranty,
could you get from Tana the most current swap one and the check it agaianst
the one we use for EEI - I would think they should be the same;  if not, lets
discuss. Thanks


Through YPO International, we got a membership inquiry from Rick Barsky,
CEO of Agennix(don't know what company does).  He apparently used to work
at Enron.  Bio says he was involved in start up of Enron Renewable Energy
Corp. and Enron Solar.  Any input you can give us on this guy?


Joe,

Thanks.

Vince

Joseph Hrgovcic
04/05/2000 04:06 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: vkaminski@aol.com, Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: CME and CATEX

---------------------- Forwarded by Joseph Hrgovcic/HOU/ECT on 04/05/2000
04:06 PM ---------------------------

Lucy Ortiz
04/05/2000 04:02 PM
To: Joseph Hrgovcic/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: CME and CATEX

Spotlight Report
  Exchange products seeing slow trading
  GAVIN SOUTER

  03/20/2000
  Business Insurance
  Page 3
  Copyright (C) 2000 Crain Communications, Inc. All rights
  reserved.

  Exchange-based insurance products developed in recent years have
  been somewhat slow to get off the ground.

  Although several exchanges have offered derivative contracts since
  the mid-1990s to cover insurance risks, none so far has posted a
  significant volume of trades.

  Few insurers, reinsurers or policyholders have been drawn away
  from the traditional insurance markets, where capacity remains
  abundant and relatively cheap.

  As long as those traditional markets manage to weather major
  natural catastrophes, the allure of the exchange-based products will
  remain limited, observers say.

  Also stifling the growth of the exchange-based contracts is the
  limited number of contracts available, one expert noted. Dealers, he
  said, are unable to secure a suitable hedge by laying off one
  contract against another.

  Although the various exchanges have had a good opportunity to
  establish a widely used set of new risk financing products, that has
  not been achieved, said Morton Lane, senior managing director,
  capital markets division at Gerling Global Financial Products in
  New York.

  The main problem with the existing exchanges is that they do not
  offer a sufficiently diverse array of products, he said. The only way
  to control the risks in the catastrophe options is to have a diversified
  portfolio of other contracts, and none of the exchanges currently
  offers a sufficiently broad range of options to provide for that
  hedge, he said.

  Florida windstorm options, for example, cannot be bought and then
  hedged in the same way that International Business Machines Corp.
  stock options contracts can be hedged with IBM stock, Mr. Lane
  explained.

  The exchanges might be more attractive to investors if, in addition to
  natural catastrophe options, they included options on other risks, he
  said. Those might include, for example, satellite, aviation and crop
  indexes, Mr. Lane said. "For the insurance buyer, such exchange
  instruments would not represent the perfect risk transfer vehicle, but
  as long as they are quantifiable and indexable, they may represent a
  good surrogate," he said.

  The exchanges could also be used to create a derivatives market for
  over-the-counter securitized deals, if there are regular issuers of
  catastrophe bonds, Mr. Lane said.

  The soft insurance market has also hindered the growth of
  exchange-based insurance products, said Sean F. Mooney, senior
  vp and chief economist at Guy Carpenter & Co., the reinsurance
  brokerage unit of Marsh Inc. in New York.

  "The traditional market has been so competitive that people are not
  looking for other ways of doing business," he said.

  At least in concept, the exchange-based deals are generally similar
  to the mortgage-backed securities that have been a huge success
  since they were introduced in the 1970s. "There is a belief that
  alternative means of transferring risks will grow, but it is difficult to
  predict when," Mr. Mooney said.

  Currently, the trading that is taking place typically involves
  established insurers and reinsurers, so the exchanges have not
  brought substantial new capacity to the marketplace, he said.

  Guy Carpenter provided the index for the Bermuda Commodities
  Exchange reinsurance products. The BCE did not take off,
  however, and was suspended last year after two years of little
  activity.

  The oldest of the insurance-related, exchange-based derivative
  products are the catastrophe options traded on the Chicago Board
  of Trade, which began trading the options in 1996.

  Initially, there was substantial interest in the options, but the soft
  traditional market has hampered use of the contracts to hedge
  catastrophe exposures, said Carlton Purty, an independent broker
  at the CBOT who trades in options.

  No catastrophe option trades have been completed at the CBOT
  so far this year, he said. Last year, there was increased interest in
  the contracts because of Hurricane Floyd, but few contracts were
  traded, Mr. Purty said.

  "I think a major, major catastrophe will have to happen before they
  really take off," he said.

  The contracts offer real protection, and options dealers are keen to
  trade in a new niche, but the conventional insurance and reinsurance
  markets are so soft that few companies are turning to alternative
  coverage options, Mr. Purty said.

  The Catastrophe Risk Exchange, located in Princeton, N.J., has
  radically changed its structure since it was originally announced in
  mid-1996, and it is well positioned to expand, said Frank Sweeney,
  chief operating officer.

  CATEX initially planned to be a computer-based facility for
  reinsurers that would enable them to exchange catastrophe risks
  and to build balanced portfolios.

  But by the time the exchange was operational in November 1996, it
  was clear that most reinsurers and insurers interested in CATEX
  wanted only to buy and sell conventional reinsurance, Mr. Sweeney
  said.

  Although there was some interest in risk swapping, only a handful of
  risks were posted on the system, and none was traded, Mr.
  Sweeney said.

  Consequently, CATEX has become chiefly a "cash for cover"
  exchange, he said, noting that the risks reinsured on the exchange
  include property catastrophe coverage, aviation and liability
  coverages. CATEX also trades industry loss warranties, where
  coverage is triggered by an actual loss combined with an industry
  loss over an agreed threshold.

  Other adjustments to the exchange included making it accessible
  through the Internet in November 1998. And late last year, CATEX
  offered users the ability to set up smaller networks, allowing them
  form groups whose members do business only with one another.

  Since its inception, CATEX has completed about 450 trades,
  totaling $400 million in premium and more than $3 billion in limits,
  he said. CATEX's roughly 160 subscribers include reinsurers,
  insurers and corporate entities that purchase coverage through their
  captives, Mr. Sweeney said.

  "We obviously have a long way to go, but we are pretty satisfied
  with what we have achieved so far," Mr. Sweeney said.

  The exchange sees increased activity after major losses, as cedents
  seek to buy replacement coverage to offset depletions in their
  existing cover, he said. For example, Mr. Sweeney said, there was
  a flurry of activity after the European windstorms in December last
  year.

  Last September, the Chicago Mercantile Exchange entered the field
  of insurance-related derivatives when it began offering weather
  derivatives .

  Thus far, 420 futures contracts have been traded, said Larry
  Grannan, senior director in product marketing at the CME.

  Such contracts are designed to allow businesses to hedge against
  weather-related losses. For example, a utility may sell less power in
  a mild winter, and it would be able to use the futures to hedge a
  resultant fall in revenues.

  The exchange first offered heat-based indexes for Atlanta, Chicago,
  Cincinnati and New York. In January, it added Philadelphia, Dallas,
  Des Moines, Las Vegas, Tucson and Portland, and it began offering
  contracts based on cold weather.

  Currently, most of the trades are between securities dealers
  themselves, but, eventually, the contracts will likely be used more
  extensively by utilities and insurers, Mr. Grannan said.

  In addition, the futures contracts could be used as hedges for
  over-the-counter securitized deals, he said.

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Phillip-

Here is the presentation.  I also sent it to Ina.


We need a utility/energy company referral.

We are an early stage e-commerce company that offers the
world's largest selection of wildlife merchandise. We are ready
to obtain our first round of financing.  We would like
to have 5 co-branding partners who would receive equity positions in
our company.  We would incorporate their logo throughout our site and
include their PR materials with each order shipped.  Target partners
would include the utility and energy companies.  Since your
company is active in this market, you may know of someone who can assist
us.

We see utility/energy companies as a compatable fit because of their
interest in projecting a positive wildlife/environmental image.

About our company:

WildlifeCollectibles.Com is a specialty catalog company featuring
wildlife merchandise.  We have the world's largest selection of wildlife
merchandise.  Currently in the wildlife merchandise niche
there are no entities offering broad merchandise selections for each
animal specie.  We are filling this void by operating 22 "sub-niche"
stores under the WildlifeCollectibles.Com brand.  These 22 storefronts
will represent 105 wildlife species.  Seven of these storefronts are
operational and the backend inventory systems are complete for the other
15.  We are in the process of loading them on the Internet.

One major component not yet installed on our site is our "Facts About
the Specie" page.  We will have reference information available for
every wildlife specie listed on our site.  At present,
there is no central repository of reference material available for most
species.  Britanica.com has reference information available for only 11
species.  This will attract school age children with their parents
tagging along.

We are looking for a total of 5 million dollars.  In order to assist
companies in purchasing an equity position/co-branded arrangement with
us, we are willing to finance their investment.  We will take $25,000.00
a month for 40 months from 5 corporate partners.  This will allow them
to budget the expense through Public Relations or Marketing.

I hope I have given you enough information to understand what
we would like to do, so you can either assist us or point us in the
right direction.  We would pay a commission and provide a small equity
stake in our company to the individual who signs on the utility/energy
companies for us.

Sincerely,
Rudy Socha
President
WildlifeCollectibles.Com
P.O. Box 410
Lorain, Ohio 44052
W-440-288-5400
H-440-933-4795

Our operating stores:

Dolphin Whale & Shark Gifts
http://www.dolphinws.com

African Animal Gifts
elephants-giraffes-hippos-rhinos-zebras
http://www.africananimalgifts.com

Wet Wing Gifts
cranes-ducks-flamingos-geese-herons-swans
http://www.wetwinggifts.com

Wild Wing Gifts
butterflies-cockatoos-hummingbirds-macaws-parrots
http://www.wildwinggifts.com

Sea Life Gifts
manatees-octopuses-sea horses-seals-sting rays-walruses
http://www.sealifegifts.com

Camel Horse & Llama Gifts
http://www.camelhorsellamagifts.com

Big Cat Gifts
cheetahs-jaguars-lions-leopards-tigers
http://www.bigcatgifts.com

Our main landing page:
WildlifeCollectibles.Com
http://www.wildlifecollectibles.com


In my Enron Online phone book Greg Whalley is now listed as the President &
CEO of Enron Net Works LLC and his phone number is 713-853-5220.

And I was told that Louise Kitchen is now COO of Enron North America and her
phone number is 713-853-3488

"Immer, Ingrid" <Ingrid.Immer@Williams.com> on 03/05/2001 11:20:01 AM
To: "'judy.townsend@enron.com'" <judy.townsend@enron.com>,
"'chris.germany@enron.com'" <chris.germany@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: FW: Customer Information

Could one of you please send me this man's phone #?? Thanks.??? ii

-----Original Message-----
From:?? Zermeno, Cynthia A
Sent:?? Monday, March 05, 2001 11:16 AM
To:???? Immer, Ingrid
Subject:??????? Customer Information

Do you have a phone number on Gregory Whalley of Eneron NOrth America --
Cheif Operating Officer?? I noted in our customer directory in Jan. 2000 that
you forwarded his address info but it did not have an phone number.?

Help!,
Cindy


Jake Arnold is scheduled to interview for the Real Time position today, at 9am in Mt. Adams. Please see the schedule below for more information:

	9:00am - Amy FitzPatrick
	9:45am - Bill Williams III

If you have any questions, let me know!

Thanks,
Grace
x8321


Article II of the NONCOMPETITION AGREEMENT entered in connection with the
sale of HPL to AEP (which closed as of June 1,2001) provides:

 "ENA [for 3 months post-close] will not  solicit, negotiate or enter into
any contract, agreement or arrangement for the purchase of natural gas on the
HPL Pipeline from any Person which is a supplier or producer of natural gas
connected to the HPL Facilities; provided, however, nothing herein shall be
construed or interpreted as prohibiting ENA from entering into any such
contract, agreement or arrangement which is less than one month in duration
and involves or is related to an Enron Online transaction."

 This is not the most clearly drafted provision as it was the subject of much
negotiation....and was significantly narrowed from the  original scope
proposed by AEP.  Thus, please consult with me prior to entering into any
solicitation, agreement or arrangement which might arguably be covered by our
limited covenant not to compete on the supply side for 3 months.  There are
many aspects of the post-close transition which will require cooperation
between Enron and AEP/HPL and thus, it behoves us to carefully weigh the
risks and rewards of "stepping too close to or over the line".

Further,although a technical reading of the non-competition agreement only
applies to ENA, no ENA UPSTREAM deals which would violate this covenant if
there were to be done as ENA should be done without clearance from Brian
Redmond and me.

Please communicate this restriction to those who report to you and have need
to be aware of this limited restriction.

Sincerely
 BNG

	Dan J Hyvl
	06/07/2001 04:59 PM

		 To: Barbara N Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: ONEOK Energy Marketing and Trading Company

Barbara,
 This appears to be supply deal for deliveries at Katy that would be subject
to the 90 day non-compete.  Sandi is in the process of getting me a copy of
the non-compete so that I can determine if this deal is covered.  Do you have
any thoughts.
----- Forwarded by Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT on 06/07/2001 04:56 PM -----

	Richard Deming/ENRON@enronXgate
	06/07/2001 02:22 PM

		 To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: ONEOK Energy Marketing and Trading Company

Dan,

Please find below details of Phy Gas deals with GTC agreements:

Deal Date: 6/06/01
Deal No: VF1896 / 835431
Buyer: ENA
Seller: ONEOK Energy Marketing and Trading Company
Start Date: 7/01/01
End Date: 6/30/02
Firm
Volume: 10,000 / day
Price: HOU.SHIP-LGPKG.IF.M.I minus USD 0.03000
Delivery Point: Exxon Katy - Katy Tailgate

Please let me know if you need any more details.

Thanks,
Richard
x54886


Isabel,

If you will email me your contact info, I will pass it along to GE.

Thanks,

Kay


---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 11/13/2000 03:27 PM
---------------------------

"Larry W. Bass" <lwbthemarine@bigplanet.com> on 11/13/2000 03:09:04 PM
To: KATHY BASS <daphneco64@bigplanet.com>, kb <daphneco64@yahoo.com>, jason
<jason.bass2@compaq.com>, eric preston bass <Eric.Bass@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Fw: The Latest Official Florida Presential Ballot

?
----- Original Message -----
From: Larry Knigge
 - BallotWPBF11.11.00.doc


I have put you on Vince's calendar for lunch on Wednesday, October 3, 2001.  I'll check with Shirley and let you know about dinner.

Regards,

Anita DuPont
Enron Research Group
713-853-0329
EB 1969

-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin_Kindall@fpl.com [mailto:Kevin_Kindall@fpl.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 1:52 PM
To: Dupont, Anita
Subject: RE: Houston

I'm already having lunch with a few of the guys, but I would love to take
you and Shirley out for dinner.  I'm flying in Saturday morning, and
leaving after lunch on Wednesday.  I'm free just about every night but
Monday.

-Kevin K.

                    "Dupont,
                    Anita"                To:     Kevin_Kindall@fpl.com
                    <Anita.Dupont@        cc:
                    enron.com>            Subject:     RE: Houston

                    09/27/2001
                    02:46 PM

I'll be happy to check.  Great to hear from you.  If you are available
for dinner, I'll try to get some of your friends together.

Regards,

Anita DuPont
Enron Research Group
713-853-0329
EB 1969

-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin_Kindall@fpl.com [mailto:Kevin_Kindall@fpl.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 1:08 PM
To: Dupont, Anita
Subject: Houston

     Hey.  I'm going to be in town next week, and was wondering if Vince
would like to do lunch on Wednesday October 3rd.  Could you check his
calendar and let me know if he is available?  Thanks.

-Kevin Kindall

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


WOW that was very powerful.  thank you for sharing this with me.    it makes
me want to make a few changes to my life,

thank you
have a great weekend maybe we can go to dinner late nexr week


EES length will be in NP-15 for 04_20.  You can find the length under PGE3
load zone as EES2.
Thanks,
Bill


Those Computer People
On-Site, Courteous, and Professional Computer Services

Data Recovery

Computer Security - Home or Office

Hardware and Software Troubleshooting

Networking - Home or Office

Internet Setup - Analog, ISDN, DSL, T1, and Wireless

Web Site Design

PC Audits

Service Agreements

Kent Smith
713-662-2667

WWW.THOSECOMPUTERPEOPLE.COM <http://www.THOSECOMPUTERPEOPLE.COM>

REFERENCES PROVIDED ON REQUEST


It's a hell hole, whaddya think?  Be great if you stopped by.  Just let me
know when you're going to be here.  Love to have dinner and catch up.

You involved at all with the gas infrastructure stuff that's going on at the
Cal PUC.  If not, I think that you should be.  Now that Fawcett has left TW
and Susan Scott's in our shop in Houston with Christie, I'm a little
concerned about TW (I don't have as much time to monitor anymore).  Be great
if you got involved.

Hope all is well with you and yours.

Best,
Jeff


Dear Sally,

Hope all is going well.  The following is a list of things I'm working on.

I'm midway through putting together the "straw-man" for the doorstep review -
which will consist of a proposal on what our goals are, what should be done
to meet those goals, who should do it, and when it should be done.  I hope to
have it ready for your review during the week of the 12th.  I'm working
together with Rick Carson on it, and also obtaining input from all the people
who participated in previous doorstep reviews.
I'm working with Mike to determine what gaps we have in the DPR process
(certain info may not be complete, some books are not received on a timely
basis).  We have some thoughts, I just need to write them up and do a bit of
research to determine how to deal with these issues.
I have a meeting set up with Jan-Erland for next Friday to discuss Japan.
I've been attending the conference calls, but need to establish my role in
the process.  I also received a message from Joe Hirl, and will set up a
meeting with him while I'm in Japan.
I've made initial contact with India, and will start attending their
conference calls.  Milind Laad has asked me to fly down to see the office,
but before I do that, I need to get up to speed with what they have done
already.
I've met with Eugenio and we have discussed the projects he works on.  He and
I need to structure what his future projects are and the resources needed for
those projects.
I'll be in London next week (I leave this Sunday and will be back in the
office on Friday) working with Brent.  I expect he will be able to give me a
lot of information to help with the doorstep straw-man.

Patti is trying to set up a weekly or bi-weekly discussion for us, starting
the week of the 12th. Until that time, I'll keep you updated through e-mail
and voice mail.  If you need me, I have given Patti all my contact info for
next week.

Have a good week-end.

Shona


The attached schedule is for Thursday, June 13.  Associated text files have been posted to Sparky.

Michael R. Frazier
Manager, Load Forecasting
Enron Energy Services
Office: 713-345-3200
Pager: 877-926-0615
P-mail: 8779260615@skytel.com


Mark,
Just wanted to give you a heads up that Steve Barry would be calling you
sometime this afternoon, apparently he was tied up this morning.
thanks

Mark.Greenberg@enron.com wrote:

> Brenda -
>
> John Allario forwarded the Sabre comments to the NDA.  I have reviewed the
> latest document and find changes to paragraphs 2, 7 and 12 only.  If this
> is accurate, then my comments are as follows:
>
> 1.  Paragraph 2 - deletion of residual knowledge - this deletion is
> unacceptable.
>
> 2.  Paragraph 7 - deletion of residual knowledge - this deletion is
> unacceptable.
>
> 3.  Paragraph 12 - deletion of arbitration - this deletion is acceptable.
>
> As to the residual knowledge concept, this is clearly a concept that Sabre
> contemplated would be outside of the boundaries of confidentiality.  The
> mere fact that the disclosing party's information is contained within
> someone's mind should not enable it to be used to the disadvantage of the
> disclosing party, nor remove it from remaining confidential.  The changes
> made by Enron on 3-20-01 should be reimplemented.  If this presents a
> problem, please have your legal personnel contact me to further explain
> Sabre's position.
>
> Mark
> Senior Counsel, ENA
> Phone:     713-345-8897
> Facsimile: 713-646-3940
> E-Mail:      Mark.Greenberg@enron.com


Tana -

Do you know what the status of adding Coal to Dynegydirect is?  Who do I need
to talk to?

I thought we were supposed to get some thing from Dynegy on this.

Thanks for the update.

Hope all is warm in Calgary.

Mark
Senior Counsel, ENA
Phone:     713-345-8897
Facsimile: 713-646-3940
E-Mail:      Mark.Greenberg@enron.com


This request has been pending approval for  14 days and you are the alternate.  Please click http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000078160&Page=Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000078160
Approver            : sandeep.kohli@enron.com
Request Create Date : 12/5/01 9:32:40 AM
Requested For       : gulay.soykok@enron.com
Resource Name       : \\enehou\houston\common\Research - [Read/Write]
Resource Type       : Directory


I wanted to give you some feedback.  Elena Chilkina has gone way above the
call of duty to help me on a very important research project.  I am trying to
conduct some research on the global fuels market for Jeff Shankman.  When I
mentioned this to Elena, she was extraordinarily helpful in helping me
compile some very useful information on very short notice.  She was able to
quickly define the scope of the project and gather some pertinent
information. Because this was not one of her regular assignments, she put in
many extra hours to help us out on this project.

I just wanted to let you know about a job well done.

Regards,

Craig


Return-Path: <jantom65@yahoo.com>
Received: from  rly-yg02.mx.aol.com (rly-yg02.mail.aol.com [172.18.147.2]) by
air-yg03.mail.aol.com (v72.8) with ESMTP; Sun, 07 May 2000 15:33:16 -0400
Received: from  web311.mail.yahoo.com (web311.mail.yahoo.com
[216.115.105.76]) by rly-yg02.mx.aol.com (v71.10) with ESMTP; Sun, 07 May
2000 15:31:55 -0400
Message-ID: <20000507193154.3616.qmail@web311.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [209.66.6.46] by web311.mail.yahoo.com; Sun, 07 May 2000
12:31:54 PDT
Date: Sun, 7 May 2000 12:31:54 -0700 (PDT)
From: Thomas Ruscitti <jantom65@yahoo.com>
Subject: Picture 3 of 3
To: Kevin David Ruscitti <KRuscitti@aol.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="0-304089172-957727914=:27573"
X-Mailer: Unknown

Here is the last group of pictures. Looks just like
me.

                   Love Dad

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send instant messages & get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com/

 - Picture3.zip


We sold 870/day starting 5/2 - 5/31 to CES for Timet.  The deal number is
257878 and the price is $3.4884 ($3.39 + $.0984).


Yair:

Tracy and Tom Moore have come to an understanding regarding the "Transfer"
language for the ISDA Schedule and have agreed that AESC will propse language
for ENA to review.  We ask that you blackline that language in a final
blacklined document for us to review.

We need to execute the ISDA Master Agreement (the "ISDA") now.  I understand
that Joe Limone and Brent Hendry have been discussing contingent call options
and related documentation.  ENA would like to incorporate these potential
trades and other transactions under the new ISDA

If you prefer, ENA would be glad to take over the drafting of the ISDA.
Please let me hear from you.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


Apparently the link to the Senate website which contains information on
today's Senate Energy Committee hearing does not work.  Therefore, I have
cut and paste the document and attached it to my e-mail.

INFORMATIONAL HEARING

Proposed Rate Agreement Between The California Department
Of Water Resources And The California Public Utilities Commission

State Capitol, Room 2040

August 21, 2001
1:30 p.m.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

I. Opening Comments

Senator Debra Bowen, Chairwoman
Senate Energy, Utilities & Communications Committee
Senator Bill Morrow, Vice-Chairman
Senate Energy, Utilities & Communications Committee
II. Panelists
Stan Dirks
California Department of Water Resources
Chris Warner
Pacific Gas & Electric
Gary Schoonyan
Southern California Edison
Jim Hay
San Diego Gas & Electric
Mike Florio
The Utility Reform Network
Dave Morse
Office of Ratepayer Advocates
Dan Carroll
California Industrial Users
Douglas Heller
Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights
Bill Julian
California Public Utilities Commission

****************************************************************************
*************

BACKGROUND
At the peak of California's electricity crisis, two of California's
investor-owned utilities were financially unable to purchase electricity on
behalf of their customers. AB 1x (Keeley), Chapter 4, Statutes of 2001,
authorized the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) to begin
buying power on behalf of the customers of those two utilities and San Diego
Gas & Electric ratepayers, as well as to issue bonds to finance such
purchases. DWR wasn't authorized to utilize the credit of the state to back
those purchases. Instead, it was authorized to recover the money needed to
pay for its electricity purchases through electric rates charged to
consumers and to perform is own "reasonableness review" of those costs. The
California Public Utilities Commission's (CPUC) discretion to perform a
reasonableness review is rarely abrogated (an exception being the costs of
collective bargaining agreements), but AB 1x made an exception in this case
for two basic reasons: First, if the CPUC decided to preclude certain power
costs from being passed along to ratepayers, the effect would be to simply
shift those costs from ratepayers to taxpayers. Second, the goal of a
reasonableness review, which is to create an incentive to do the best
possible job, on behalf of the ratepayers could be accomplished through DWR'
s accountability to ratepayers. The theory was the political process would
provide the check on DWR's activities much in the same way customers provide
a check on the activities of a municipal utility.

To fulfill its obligations under AB 1x, DWR spent $7.6 billion through May
2001. That money was originally loaned from the General Fund. In addition,
the state obtained a short-term bank loan of $4.3 billion to help pay for
ongoing electricity purchases. That short-term loan, the outstanding debt
owed to the General Fund, and the difference between actual electricity
costs and electricity rates paid to DWR will all be financed through a $12.5
billion bond offering, which was authorized by SB 31x (Burton), Chapter 9,
Statutes of 2001, and may take place as early as October. DWR has stated
that the bond offering is contingent upon the CPUC taking a number of
actions on August 23, 2001, one of which is to approve the DWR-constructed
Rate Agreement (Agreement) between DWR and the CPUC.

The Agreement provides the irrevocable contractual and enforceable assurance
that the CPUC will allow DWR's electricity power purchase costs to be
recovered in a timely manner. Specifically, the Agreement:

Creates a Rate Covenant where the CPUC acknowledges DWR's right to recover
its self-determined revenue requirement as specified;
Defines DWR's revenue requirement to include the repayment of the bonds, the
cost of DWR's electricity procurement, including the long-term contracts,
administrative, consulting and legal costs, and the cost of demand
management programs;
Requires the CPUC to establish rates to allow recovery of DWR's revenue
requirement within 30 days or 90 days, as determined by DWR;
Authorizes DWR to take the CPUC to court to enforcement its provisions.
DWR has stated the Agreement is an essential element to obtaining the bond
financing. J.P. Morgan, the senior managing underwriter for the DWR bonds,
has similarly stated that without the Agreement, the bonds won't be viewed
as investment grade quality, thereby jeopardizing the bond issuance.
The Agreement is currently being considered by the CPUC. A number of
parties, including small and large consumer groups who will be responsible
for paying the rates, along with the investor-owned utilities, have
commented on DWR's proposed Agreement and raised a number of concerns. The
Treasurer has offered some suggested amendments to the Agreement to try and
answer some of the concerns without impairing his ability to sell the bonds.

Issues & Questions The Committee May Wish To Consider

Must an Agreement be Signed?

AB 1x permits the CPUC to enter into a rate agreement with DWR, but such an
agreement is not required by the statute. Given the irrevocable nature of
DWR's proposed Agreement, is it necessary for the CPUC to approve the
agreement, or will some other, less binding agreement suffice? One alternate
approach to the Agreement is SB 18xx (Burton), which provides a dedicated
rate to pay for the bonds and specifies exactly what DWR may include as a
part of its costs. SB 18xx passed the Senate 35-2 on July 20, 2001, and is
pending at the Assembly desk.

Public Review

DWR's revenue requirement, at least as it pertains to power purchase costs,
bond repayment, and associated administrative costs, clearly isn't subject
to CPUC review or adjustment pursuant to AB 1x. Rather than have an
independent party like the CPUC review its efforts, AB 1x envisioned that
public review and accountability would motivate DWR to do the best possible
job to get the best value possible for ratepayers. However, the Agreement
neither contemplates nor provides for public review, which has raised
concerns from a number of parties about what costs beyond the cost of buying
power DWR is attempting to pass along to ratepayers as a part of the
Agreement.

Scope of Revenue Requirement

AB 1x specifically permits DWR to cover the cost of the bonds, power
purchases, and associated administrative costs. The Agreement submitted by
DWR to the CPUC for adoption allows DWR to recover much more than those
costs, including the cost of demand management programs and legal,
consulting, and technical services. By including such costs in the
Agreement, these costs are subject to neither legislative nor public review.
The demand management programs have historically been the purview of the
CPUC. (The California Independent System Operator has attempted this year to

create and administer some of these programs with mixed success.) However,
DWR has no background in demand management and no public process for
considering and approving such programs. Given the lack of a public process
and DWR's lack of expertise on demand management programs, is it appropriate
to allow DWR to include the unknown costs of these programs in the
Agreement?

30 and 90 Day Review

The Agreement requires the CPUC to review and implement rates which allow
DWR to recover its revenue requirement within 90 days, or 30 days if DWR
finds that an expedited change is necessary. This is an extremely short
window of time for the CPUC to analyze any DWR request and provide for full
public review and comment.

Auditing

DWR's revenue requirement will be tens of billions of dollars which will be
paid for exclusively by the ratepayers of the state's investor-owned
utilities. Despite the fact that billions of dollars will be changing hands,
the Agreement fails to include an auditing requirement to ensure that
appropriate revenues are provided to DWR, that surplus revenues are returned
to ratepayers, and that there is ongoing monitoring of DWR's accounts.

Court Challenges

The purpose of the rate agreement is to facilitate the issuance of the bonds
to repay the General Fund and the short-term loan. It's possible that some
party may challenge this Agreement or any of the other related CPUC
decisions (i.e. establishing the DWR revenue requirement, creating a
servicing agreement between DWR and the utilities, etc.), in either federal
or state court. How will such a challenge effect the issuance of the bonds?

Contract Renegotiation

The DWR contracts, negotiated at the height of the energy crisis, are viewed
by some as expensive. The state and ratepayers would certainly be better off
if those contracts can be renegotiated based upon current circumstances. The
Agreement binds the CPUC to set rates sufficient for DWR to recover its
revenue requirement, including the cost of the contracts it has already
signed. Does the signing of this Agreement diminish DWR's ability or
incentive to renegotiate any of the contracts? Does it eliminate any
incentive DWR has to negotiate the best possible price on any future
contracts that it may sign, since the costs of those contracts won't be
subject to review or adjustment?


Kim, I had asked Randy to have you put Jeff Dasovich on the distribution list
for these reports, but it must have slipped his mind.   Jeff's e-mail address
is jeff.dasovich@enron.com.  Would appreciate it if you would send him future
reports.  Hopefully, there won't be many more!!

Thanks.

"Kimberly Curry" <kcurry@bracepatt.com> on 05/24/2001 06:38:59 PM
To: <jsteffe@enron.com>, <jthome@enron.com>, <llawner@enron.com>,
<lyoho@enron.com>, <Rebecca.w.cantrell@enron.com>, <skean@enron.com>
cc: "Randall Rich" <rrich@bracepatt.com>
Subject: CPUC v. El Paso, Days 8 and 9

All:

Attached is a brief memo describing the hearing.  One notable event that came
out of today's hearing is that Bill Wise will take the stand tomorrow
afternoon to answer questions from the Judge (and possibly other parties)  on
the February 14 presentation regarding the EPME acquisition of the EPNG
capacity.

Kimberly A. Curry
Bracewell & Patterson, L.L.P
2000 K Street, N.W.
Suite 500
(202) 828-7623 (phone)
(202) 857-2107 (fax)
kcurry@bracepatt.com

 - 0142965.doc


In the second version I eliminated the market share cap for affiliates (it is something we wanted to claim in Arg since we knew nobody would respect any rule of conduct).
Bob Frank ask me if he could have more time to read the original paper to add his comments. You decide if we wait.
Guille

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Steffes, James D.
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 7:57 AM
To:	Canovas, Guillermo
Subject:	RE: DISCO of the Future

Guillermo --

I should sign the letter.  Also, we should be consistent on affiliates given EPMI and Enron Gas Mktg.  We are affiliates of a pipeline.  We offer competitive services on the affiliated pipelines.  Let's be consistent with our own business.

When are you going to send the letter?

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Canovas, Guillermo
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 3:44 PM
To:	Kingerski, Harry; Ibrahim, Amr; Frank, Robert; Levy, Alberto
Cc:	Steffes, James D.
Subject:	DISCO of the Future

Attached is a first draft of comments to CAEM about the Disco of the future document to discuss in our 4pm meeting.
The idea is to comment just the top 5 issues.
Regards,
Guillermo

 << File: n-distco future.doc >>


could you just let me know if you got the last email


Please note: Item of interest!!!!

__________________

Thursday October 18, 12:43 pm Eastern Time
Press Release
SOURCE: United States Steel LLC
Minntac Passes Two-Billion-Ton Milestone

MOUNTAIN IRON, Minn., Oct. 18 /PRNewswire/ -- The Minntac Mining Operations
of United States Steel LLC passed a major milestone recently when it mined
its two-billionth ton of material. The total includes nearly 1.3 billion
tons of crude ore and approximately 416 million tons of waste rock and 296
million tons of overburden.

Minntac became the nation's first iron ore mining operation to reach this
production landmark when one of the mine's 35-cubic-yard shovels loaded
rock onto a 240-ton production truck at 2:06 a.m., Saturday, October 6. The
load was then taken to the Minntac Coarse Crusher where it was ground into
gravel-sized chunks to be used in the taconite process.

``This symbolic milestone reflects the hard work, innovation and dedication
of thousands of Minntac employees over the past half century,'' said
Minntac General Manager Jim Swearingen. ``It also reflects U. S. Steel's
continuing commitments to the Minnesota Iron Range and Minntac, where the
company has invested more than $200 million during the past five years to
enhance our operations and make Minntac more competitive in terms of
product quality and efficiency.

``We mined our two-billionth ton 50 years after U. S. Steel broke ground
for the Pilotac mine, the forerunner of Minntac, and only 15 years after we
passed the one-billion-ton mark in May 1986. We're looking forward to
reaching the next billion-ton plateau.''

On October 2, 1967, Minntac began processing taconite into pellets used in
blast furnaces to make the molten iron used in making steel, including high
value grades for the automotive, appliance, construction and other
industries. When it first began making taconite pellets, Minntac had a
rated annual capacity of 4.5 million tons. U. S. Steel has since nearly
quadrupled that capacity and, to date, Minntac has processed a total of 374
million tons of taconite pellets.

U. S. Steel's Minntac iron ore operations at Mountain Iron employ
approximately 1,600 workers and produce about 16.4 million tons of taconite
pellets annually. Minntac, North America's largest taconite pellet
producer, covers nearly 40,000 acres, including a mine that stretches 12
miles along the Mesabi Range.


The original message is encrypted using Lotus Notes Public and Private Key security.  Encrypted messages cannot be migrated to Microsoft Exchange Server.


This is Saunders entire world plus Borcyk's world for tax.   Accounting and Reporting are consolidated, not worth splitting and the cost estimate should be a net Enron estimate.

Call Kirk Stevens for the Portland info and Tod (unless you know who else) for the EREC world.   What about Wessex?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Geaccone, Tracy
Sent:	Tuesday, August 28, 2001 10:20 AM
To:	Hayslett, Rod
Subject:	FW: Request: Current Headcount

Lets discuss this before I start pulling data.  I want to make sure I pull in the right groups.  I have a call into Corp to try to figure out what they are getting at here.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Schwarzbach, Stephen
Sent:	Monday, August 27, 2001 5:17 PM
To:	Killen, Faith; Geaccone, Tracy; Tran, Agatha; Lee, Dana
Subject:	Request: Current Headcount

Hi everyone.  I have yet another request for which I need your input.  Causey is reviewing his budgets/direct reports, and would like to get the most current headcount numbers for the accounting groups in your business unit(s).

What I mean by accounting groups includes everyone whose superior ultimately reports to Causey.  For instance, this would include the traditional Accounting/Reporting departments, Tax departments, and Transaction Support departments.  It should NOT include any settlements/mid-office groups (for example, Sally Beck's world).  I say "department" because I don't want just accountants, but everyone who is in that dept, i.e. admins, clerks, etc.  If you have a question on any unique situation, please just give me a call and we'll discuss.

The data needs to be as recent as possible.  Hopefully, I can get this as of July 31/August 1.  If you have more recent data, that would be great.  At a bare minimum, I need total headcount as described by group (acct, reporting, tax, etc.)  It would also be useful to get as much detail as possible, i.e. by sub-group, by personnel level, etc., but I know that may be a challenge given the timing of the request.

Additionally, if you can provide me with a "current estimate" for the groups you report, that would be ideal.  I know that the official CE doesn't go to that level, but I'm betting that most of you have something that projects your G&A by cost center (or group/dept) for 2001, as of the 2nd CE.

The headcount information is a must have, and the 2001 cost estimate is secondary, although I'd like to ask everyone to strive to provide both.  If you can't provide estimated costs for the groups you report, please call me so we can discuss.

Speaking of the timing, I need this by Wednesday, August 29 at 12 noon.  This will be given to Rick on Thursday morning, so I'll need some time to consolidate the data and to ask you all any further questions.

If you have any questions, please give me a call.

Thanks,
Steve

PS--Here are the BUs I expect each of you:

Faith (also, let me know if you'd prefer me to email this to each group instead of going through you)
ENA
Europe
EGM
EIM
ENW
EPI
EEOS
EBS

Tracy
ETS
PGG
EREC

Agatha
EGAS

Dana
EES


I have let Lexi know that I have a conflict with this meeting time -- I will
be doing a business review meeting with Jeff Skilling on global risk
management operations at 10:00 on September 7th.  I just wanted you to know
that I continue to be committed to the recruiting effort at OU.  I have asked
Lexi to update me on the meeting.  --Sally
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 08/25/2000 05:45 PM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Lexi Elliott @ ENRON                           08/25/2000 05:13 PM

To: Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward
Coats/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James Scribner/Corp/Enron@Enron, Tamara
Hopkins/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Patrick Wade/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patrick
Cunningham/HOU/EES@EES, Bob Klein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark McConnell/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Ronnie Shields/HOU/EES@EES, Eric
Moon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen Plauche/Corp/Enron@Enron, Angie
Zeman/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jody Crook/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Patrick
Maloy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rafael Avila/HOU/EES@EES, Nate Blackburn/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Cathy Phillips/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patti Thompson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shelly
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: OU Team Meeting

MARK YOUR CALENDAR:

University of Oklahoma Recruiting Team Meeting

  Date: September 7, 2000
Time:    10:00 am
Location: EB 3321

Please come and meet your fellow team members!!!

RSVP to Lexi Elliott 3-4585


Mark, these are the guys with whom we'd terminated our discussions based on
their violation of our NDA with them.  You had that attorney inyour group
(the lady from NY) word a letter for them.

Thanks for passing this on Fred.

- R

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Philipson, Fred
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 1:58 PM
To: Jafry, Rahil
Subject: Legal Issue?

R -

Was looking over Excambria's site to see if they have customers yet.  Found
that they are still using the article from Derivatives Week that mentions
Enron.

http://www.excambria.com/html/derivatives_week.html


Enron is proud to be a Charity Partner Sponsor for the 2001 Shell Houston
Open being held April 16-22 on the Tournament Players Course at The
Woodlands.  The Shell Houston Open ranks No. 2 among PGA TOUR tournaments
with charitable donations of $4.5 million.  While today,s top players are
entertaining you, remember the net proceeds of the tournament will benefit
more than 300 local worthy charities in need of a helping hand.

Attached is a list of available tickets, parking passes and various
invitations, along with a schedule of events.

To order tickets, please follow the procedures listed below:

PROCEDURE FOR REQUESTING SHELL HOUSTON OPEN TICKETS
1)  Send an E-MAIL request to LAURA PENA with the following information:
 a)  Name of Requester
 b)  Title of Requester
 c)  Company
 d)  Department
 e)  Location
 f)   Telephone
 g)  List of items and quantity of each (please notice tickets are limited)
2)  Distribution is on a first-come, first-served basis. THE ONLY TICKETS
LEFT FOR THE SKY BOX ARE FOR WEDNESDAY-NO OTHER SKY BOX TICKETS   ARE
AVAILABLE.
3)  NO PHONE ORDERS WILL BE ACCEPTED

Please keep in mind the sole purpose for these tickets is to entertain our
valued customers. Your cost centers will not be charged for the tickets.

If you have any questions, please contact:
 Laura Pena  (713) 853-5376
 Dorie Hitchcock  (713) 853-6978

http://home.enron.com:84/messaging/shelldescript.doc


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 03/14/2000 04:13
PM ---------------------------
From: Heidi Griffith@EES on 03/14/2000 04:25 PM EST
To: Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert
Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Theresa Franklin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wade R
Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gloria G Barkowsky/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joan
Veselack/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: John M Singer/Corp/Enron@Enron, James T Javins/DUB/EES@EES
Subject: Conversion of Gatherco Stations

Effective 04/1/2000, Columbia Gas Transmission will be transferring certain
facilities to Gatherco, Inc.  There should have been a message in Columbia
Navigator stating that there were certain meters that were going out of your
IPP pool 37147 effective 4/2000.  The subject for this e-mail message was
"Appalachian Meter Allocation".  The meters listed in this e-mail will now be
on Gatherco's gathering lines and are going to be subject to the $.25
gathering rate.  Per Dave Fusek at Gatherco, our final estimates for 04/2000
SHOULD reflect these meters that were changed from Columbia Gas Transmission
to Gatherco.  He said he is not 100% positive that they will get this
finished in time, but they are hoping to have everything complete by the time
they release our nominations.

Gloria and Wade,

You will need to make sure you have the correct charges associated with these
meters.  Some of these meters were previously subject to Columbia's $.27
gathering and some were straight transmission, which did not have any
gathering.  Again, these meters will now have a $.25 gathering charge.

Please call me if you have any questions.

Thanks,
Heidi Griffith


============================================================
Crossfire at 7:30 p.m. ET
On January 8, 2002
And online at CNN.com/CROSSFIRE
============================================================

From CNN's Crossfire Staff:

Tonight in the CROSSFIRE... the U.S. Justice Department
is putting top priority on tracking down 6,000
"deportable aliens" of Middle Eastern and Arab descent.
Is it racial profiling to target one ethnic group for
ejection? Shouldn't all aliens who have overstayed their
visas or violated rules be treated equally? Could this
measure help prevent future terrorist attacks, or is it
a violation of individual rights? After Sept. 11th and
given the common characteristics of the hijackers, is
it justified to apply added scrutiny to those who fit
the same profile? Former Deputy Attorney General George
Terwilliger argues that profiling may be necessary in
the war on terrorism while Wade Henderson of the
Leadership Council on Civil Rights says individuals
of certain backgrounds shouldn't be singled out by
law enforcement. It should make for a heated debate.

Join Bill Press and Robert Novak tonight on Crossfire,
7:30pm eastern, 4:30 pacific. On CNN.

Visit http://www.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/crossfire/
to send in your e-mail to be included in our Fire
Back segment, take Crossfire's trivia quiz and offer
your opinions on our show topics and guests.
=============================================================
=============================================================

Read our privacy guidelines at:
http://cnn.com/privacy.html

(c) 2002 Cable News Network, Inc.
An AOL Time Warner Company
All Rights Reserved.

======================================================
To unsubscribe, click here:
http://cgi.cnn.com/cgi-bin/mail/clik?email=kenneth.lay@enron.com&list=crossfire
This message was sent to you at kenneth.lay@enron.com


Hold on.  Dan and I discussed it, but it is not my call whether anyone other than EES bears those costs.  For what it's worth, I agreed with Dan that to the extent Tom and Ken had reached agreement regarding, among other things, Tom's use of the corporate aircraft for non-EES purposes, that it may not make sense to have EES bear those costs.  But it was clear in my conversation with Dan that it was not my call to make.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Stubblefield, Wade
Sent:	Friday, August 24, 2001 7:24 PM
To:	Causey, Richard; Butts, Bob
Cc:	Leff, Dan; Kean, Steven J.
Subject:	Tom White Expenses

Rick/Bob,

Dan had a discussion with Steve Kean regarding expense attributable to Tom White during 2001.  It is my understanding from their discussion that they agreed that EES should not have to bear these costs and that I should get with you to get the appropriate place to charge them.

Bob, can you please provide me with the right home.

Please call if you have any questions.

Wade

 << File: Tom White summary2.xls >>


The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  ? 2001 Carr Futures

The charts are now available on the web by clicking on the hot link(s)
contained in this email. If for any reason you are unable to receive the
charts via the web, please contact me via email and I will email the charts
to you as attachments.

Crude     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/crude63.pdf
Natural Gas     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/ngas63.pdf

Feb. WTI/Brent Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/clg-qog.pdf
Feb Heat Crack     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/heatcrack.pdf
Feb Gas Crack     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/gascrack.pdf
Feb Gas/Heat Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hug-hog.pdf
June Gas/Heat Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/HUM-HOM.pdf
March Gas/Heat Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/HUH-HOH.pdf
Feb/May Unlead Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/HUG-HUK.pdf
Feb/July Crude oil Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/CLG-CLN.pdf

Nat Gas Strip Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/StripmatrixNG63.pdf
Nat Gas Spread Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SpreadmatrixNG63.pdf

Crude and Products Spread Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SpreadmatrixCL63.pdf


Greg

Thanks for the presentation. We will let you know the acceptance rate.

Neil


poor thing.  what else is there after dual 790s?

	Nancy Sellers <Nancy.Sellers@RobertMondavi.com>
	04/26/2001 10:29 AM

		 To: Cameron <cameron@perfect.com>, Jeff Dasovich <Jeff_Dasovich@enron.com>,
"Prentice @ Berkeley" <PSellers@haas.berkeley.edu>, Prentice Sellers
<PSellers@pacbell.net>, Scott Laughlin <scottwl@hotmail.com>
		 cc: "'Eldon Sellers'" <Eldon@direcpc.com>
		 Subject: MORGAN

Morgan got a 790/790 on her SAT - I guess she'll have to take it over!

Nancy
(707) 251-4870 (phone)
(707) 265-5446 (fax)
"Plus je bois, mieux je chante"


Short Term Cali is short NP and long SP for HE 1-7, 23 and 24 tomorrow
(03/07).  Please look in ECTSTCali to check theshort amounts in PGE2 and PGE
3, length is in SCE1 and SDGE1 under ECTSTCali and EES 2.  Please do the
ST-Cali deals under the ST-Cali book.  We will split ST-Cali profits in SP
50/50 over $150.  Any EES2 sale are still $5(deals under ST-Whourly).  In the
North we will just buy for ST-Cali to help them cover their short (again
deals under ST-Cali).  IF you have any questions please call.
Bill


Vince and Zimin,
PSIM presentation is scheduled on 4 pm, Tuesday Oct. 30 (this is the only availabe time,
EB5C2 is fully booked, and Vince will be out of town Wednesday and Thursday).
I've listed some people below. Can you add more to the list?

Power Traders:
Doug Gilbert-Smith
Harry Arora
Robert Stalford
Steve Wang
Iris Mack
Power Structure:
Jim Meyn
Nick Hiemstra
Rahul Seksaria
Power Origination:
Pete Heintzelman
Edward Baughman
Tom May
Clint Dean
Utku Gulmeden
EES:
Berney Aucoin
Edith Cross
RAC:
Naveen Andrews
Power Fundamentals
Rika Imai


---------------------- Forwarded by John Arnold/HOU/ECT on 04/06/2001 12:56
PM ---------------------------

SOblander@carrfut.com on 04/06/2001 08:36:38 AM
To: soblander@carrfut.com
cc:
Subject: option candlesticks as a hot link

The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  , 2001 Carr Futures

The charts are now available on the web by clicking on the hot link(s)
contained in this email. If for any reason you are unable to receive the
charts via the web, please contact me via email and I will email the charts
to you as attachments.

Option Candlesticks
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/candlesticks65.pdf

Carr Futures
150 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 1500
Chicago, IL 60606  USA
Tel:  312-368-6149
Fax:  312-368-2281
soblander@carrfut.com
http://www.carrfut.com


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Andy Zipper/Corp/Enron on 10/12/2000
02:04 PM ---------------------------

Duuna Richardson <duuna.richardson@intcx.com> on 10/05/2000 11:54:52 AM
To: "'Andy.zipper@enron.com'" <Andy.zipper@enron.com>
cc: Rafe Pirutinsky <rafael.pirutinsky@intcx.com>

Subject: IntercontinentalExchange, LLC

>  Dear Andy,
>
>  Per Rafael Pirutinsky of Intercontinental, attached is some
> additional information about The ICE.
>
>  First, is an electronically executed copy of our Participant
> Agreement signed by each customer and our Service and Pricing Schedules.
> If you have any questions,  please call Chuck Vice at 770.738.2129.  If
> not, you may execute and return a copy to Chuck's attention at the address
> below at your earliest convenience.
>
>  Also attached is our Customer Information Packet which contains a
> functional and technical overview of our trading system, The ICE, as well
> as instructions for downloading the application and requesting access as a
> Demo User.  If you have any questions regarding this packet, please call
> the ICE Helpdesk at 770.738.2101.  They can answer your technical
> questions or have an appropriate technology representative speak with you.
>
>  Thank you for your interest.
>
>  Regards,
>
>  Duuna Richardson
>  IntercontinentalExchange, LLC
>  2100 RiverEdge Parkway, Suite 400
>  Atlanta, GA  30328
>  Tel:    770.738.2137
>  Fax:   770.951.5481
>  ---------------------------------------------------
 <<Participant Agreement 080200.doc>>  <<Service and Pricing Schedules.doc>>
 <<Customer Information Packet.doc>>

 - Participant Agreement 080200.doc
 - Service and Pricing Schedules.doc
 - Customer Information Packet.doc


Here is the suit that was filed against 29 top directors/officers on Wednesday.  The list of loot by individual is on page 11 and 12.

Patrick


I checked with Skilling's office and there is nothing scheduled.    The
Gov.'s office bascially said "don't call us, we'll call you".

     Maureen


Dave

I'm thinking of hiring Kim Hillis.

I would like your opinion.

Lavo

713-853-7991


Start Date: 4/21/01; HourAhead hour: 11;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042111.txt

---- Generation Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: HARBOR
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/21/01
  UNIT_ID: HARBGN_7_UNITS