Click here now  to receive your FREE investor care package
on a New BioTech Stock in a Red-Hot Market!
Centrex Inc. (CNEX - OTCBB)
Centrex Inc. (CNEX - OTCBB) owns the exclusive rights
to a bacteria-detection system developed at Los Alamos
National Laboratory which allows for the detection of E. Coli.
The company believes its proprietary technology can also be used
for the detection of other bacterial and viral agents.
Investment Highlights on Centrex Inc. (CNEX - OTCBB)
New bioTech stock in red-hot market
Company to market detection technology to
- Postal Service
- Military
- State and City Health Departments
- Airports
Research contract with Los Alamos National Laboratory
Technology is adaptable to detect a variety of organisms
Grant application received from the federal government
Other viral and bacterial agents being looked at for detection include
- Salmonella typhi (typhoid)
- Vibrio cholerae (cholera)
- Yersinia pestis (plague)
- Ebola
Click here now  to receive your FREE investor care package
on a New BioTech Stock in a Red-Hot Market!
Centrex Inc. (CNEX - OTCBB)

Disclaimer: InvestFacts.com was paid $5,000 US by Corporate Profile
of NY for this distribution. InvestFacts.com does not own stock in
Centrex Inc. and is not affiliated with Centrex Inc.. The words and
claims contained in this report are those of Corporate Profile of New York
and not Investfacts.com. Investfacts.com has not attempted to verify
any of the claims or statements contained herein. Investors must conduct
their own due diligence. This notice shall not constitute an offer to sell
or the solicitation of an offer to buy nor shall there be any sale of these
securities in any state in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be
unlawful prior to registration or qualification under the securities laws of
any such state. Please check with your broker or with the company to determine
whether these securities may be purchased or sold in your state of residence prior
to effecting a transaction. The statements contained herein that are not statements
of historical fact, including statements related to future financial expectations or
industry growth expectations are "forward-looking statements" and involve risk and
uncertainty. Actual results may differ due to numerous factors. See the company's
filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission for details on such factors.

  --- You are currently subscribed to investfacts as: alewis@ect.enron.com To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-investfacts-40195N@utarget.sparklist.com


Mike is checking with broker.

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
04/11/2001 08:36 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: deal 577823

What's the status?

   Kate Symes @ ECT                04/10/2001 06:29 PM

To: Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: deal 577823

This is the price Prebon quoted to Mike tonight - he'll be checking in the
morning to see what the spread should have been.

Thanks,
Kate

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
04/10/2001 03:23 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: deal 577823

Mike Driscoll
deal 577823
Prebon shows price as $97.95 ....enpower has $79.95


Mark and Mark:

This is a request for assistance from the TaxCommittee, which is preparing a
comment letter on the January 2001 proposed IRS regulations concening
hedging transactions.

Most of the comment letter addresses whether the Proposed Regulations
implement Congressional intent in replacing risk reduction with risk
management as the standard for hedging transaction status.  The Proposed
Regulations provide that unless explicity permitted, "a hedging transaction
does not include a transaction entered into to manage risks other than
interest rate or price changes, or currency fluctuations,..."  The Preamble
to the Proposed Regulations indicate that the Service wishes to receive
comments on additional risks that should be covered. Here is an excerpt from
the draft comment letter "

The Preamble to the Proposed Regulations indicates that a
weather derivative used by an energy producer to hedge against the risk of
decreases in the volume of sales resulting from variations in weather
patterns will not qualify as a hedge transaction until the Service exercises
its regulatory authority.  The Service should do so now.

Don Moorehead (who has an active tax practice as well as the active "Hill"
practice we know so well) is the drafter and makes strong arguments for
extending hedge transaction treatment to weather derivatives.  To help with
the argument, we would like to attach as an exhibit specific examples of
types of weather derivatives that could be incorporated in the final
regulations.

A similar concern exists with respect to energy supply derivatives.  Quoting
again from the draft letter:

Under the Proposed Regulations, if a business that is an intensive
user of energy (e.g., an aluminum producer) enters  into a transaction
to manage the risk of increased energy prices, that transaction apparently
can qualify as a hedge  transaction.  If, however, the transaction is
intended to manage the risk of an energy supply interruption, it apparently
will not qualify as a hedge transaction...

The energy supply derivative, like the weather derivative, alters
the taxpayer's exposure to risks that are inherent in its core economic
activities and there is no discernable policy rationale for delay in
extending hedge transaction treatment to energy supply derivatives,
particularly in light of the exclusivity provisions of the Proposed
Regulations.

To help with the argument, we would like to attach as an exhibit specific
examples of types of energy price and supply derivatives that could be
incorporated in the final regulations.

We look to you for help in this lists of products. Could you please point us
to someone at Enron who could supply such lists and promote more "risk
management" tax treatment for weather/energy derivatives?

Thanks in advance and regards, Ruth


Start Date: 1/12/02; HourAhead hour: 15;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002011215.txt


This is to advise you that we have canceled next Wednesday's ETS Half Day
Staff Meeting.    Our next meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, August 15,
from 8:30AM to 1:00PM in 49C2.    We are taking a summer break to accommodate
vacation schedules.

Don't hesitate to call me if you have any questions or concerns with this
notice.

Thanks,
Cindy


Any new information on the $1.5mm owed by Goldman Sachs?


Start Date: 4/11/01; HourAhead hour: 5;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Generation schedule.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041105.txt

---- Generation Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE.
     Details: (Hour: 5 / Preferred:  33.08 / Final:  20.00)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: TOSCO
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/11/01
  UNIT_ID: UNCHEM_1_UNIT
$$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE.
     Details: (Hour: 5 / Preferred:  41.60 / Final:  41.57)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: DELANO
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/11/01
  UNIT_ID: PANDOL_6_UNIT

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 5 / Preferred:  47.00 / Final:  46.99)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTstSW
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/11/01
  TIE_POINT: MEAD_2_WALC
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_8000
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL
+++ Hour 5 - bad data from ISO.
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/11/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_BUNNY
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL
+++ Hour 5 - bad data from ISO.
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/11/01
  TIE_POINT: SLVRPK_7_SPP
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_BUNNY
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL
+++ Hour 5 - bad data from ISO.
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/11/01
  TIE_POINT: SLVRPK_7_SPP
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_SCOUT
  ENGY_TYPE: NFRM

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 5 / Preferred:   0.43 / Final:   0.29)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE1
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/11/01
  SC_ID: EPMI
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 5 / Preferred:   4.69 / Final:   3.35)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE2
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/11/01
  SC_ID: EPMI
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 5 / Preferred:  42.87 / Final:  31.31)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE3
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/11/01
  SC_ID: EPMI
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 5 / Preferred:  21.55 / Final:  25.55)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: SCE1
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/11/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


Sorry to bother you all again, but I have received limited response to my
inquiry for course recommendations for your fellow evening students.  I was
hoping to include these recommendations in a Student Advisory Committee
Newsletter I was hoping to distribute before registration for next semester
begins.  Thus, if you have any recommendations, please take just a few
moments to send me an e-mail with your thoughts.

Thanks,
Mike Plumb
SAC Chair

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Plumb Michael D
> Sent: Sunday, October 22, 2000 3:11 PM
> To: 'eveningmba@haas.berkeley.edu'
> Subject: Course Recommendations
>
> Fellow Evening Students,
> The time to register for classes for next semester is rapidly approaching.
> I hope to be publishing the first ever Student Advisory Committee (SAC)
> newsletter in the next week or so, and I want to include a section on
> course recommendations from fellow students.  I'm sure most of you have
> been at the Pizza dinners in the past and heard a student chime in when
> Diane is discussing a particular course to say what a great class it is.
> I want to capture these recommendations and include them in the newsletter
> for everyone's benefit.  I assume most of you have seen, or will see this
> week at the pizza dinners, the tentative evening schedule for next
> semester.  If there is a particular course that is offered that you have
> taken and would like to strongly recommend to your fellow students, please
> forward me your recommendation with an explanation via e-mail.  Please try
> to get your recommendation to me by the end of the week.
>
> Thanks,
> Mike Plumb
> SAC Chair
>
> Michael Plumb
> Director, Health Services Actuarial - Northern California
> PacifiCare of California
> 415-356-7430
> MS CN81-200
>


---------------------- Forwarded by Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT on 03/27/2001 03:52 PM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.  From:  "Emily Hillegeist" <ehillegeist@hotmail.com>                           03/26/2001 11:58 AM

To:	sscott5@enron.com
cc:
Subject:	Fwd: Whats Up?

KEEP YOUR FRIENDS CLOSE AND YOUR ENEMIES CLOSER!  com'on.....realllly!  one
would think this email was to organize a trip to london- but nooooo...it's a
"hands off" warning instead.  and admittedly, the bit about "trusting me to
honor" pulls at me and w/ anyone else, i'd snap into good behavior mode, but
then i step bk and realize how sneaky and evil (hel-lo?  who is mitch?  does
she have dibs on him as well?  how many 'dibs' are we allocated?  let me
know when you get the scoop...)what nerve!  as for the 1 line about coming
to london, katy isn't coming mid may- she's coming at the end-begin. of
june, which is much better for me, too- have school full-time til last week
of may....so, i vote you send her mid may, then come w/ kates at the end of
the month.  and, gee- do tyou think i can predict her visit?  let's see-
it'll be convenient and cheap to stay w/ me....but- perfect timing for her
to show up at my doorstep, get her extra key, then jaunt off to 'secure' her
position w/ mr.dibs....not that i'm complaining- just horribly offended that
she thinks i'm so dense as to not be able to see- and hear- her large, slow,
unoiled wheels a-turning....!  aughhhhh!  see below, obviously....
e

>From: Lisa.Gillette@enron.com
>To: ehillegeist@hotmail.com
>Subject: Whats Up?
>Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 10:19:11 -0600
>
>Em,
>
>how are things?  i was hoping to give you the latest news, but hear katy
>has already let you in on the new swedish cutie roaming the streets of
>london.  i know susan has already warned you that i have dibs on him, so i
>am trusting you to honor that.  however, i dont think that will be a
>problem - i think you will find him physically attractive, but maybe
>nothing more than that.  he's kind of dopey and doe-de-doe.  you either
>enjoy hes weird charm or are completely annoyed by it.  anyways- i hear
>tobin is visiting, hows that going?  i am hoping to come in mid may if that
>works for you.  i am going to try to get susan to come along as well, but
>let me know what your plans look like for the next couple of months.
>
>talk to you later,
>lisa
>

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com


From astrology.com (must I beware of overindulgence in such websites?)
I like the part about charm and charisma and think it is very true.

Sagittarius and Sagittarius
When two Sagittarians join together in a love match, the truth-loving natures
makes theirs a near perfect relationship. This couple views the world around
them with an educated eye and both share an intense hunger for more
knowledge. They will engage one another in pleasant conversation and
banter that challenges and tickles the mind.  An occasional hotheaded dispute
can erupt in the Sagittarius-Sagittarius relationship, when one fact-fanatic
Sag
partner carries things a little too far. Easygoing and independent, these two
are
compatible when it comes to balancing personal interests. They've never known
jealousy, and each partner keeps busy with personal projects when not with
their
lover. When they are together, however, they do all they can toward pleasing
their partner and satiating common interests.  Although they are adaptable
and
modern, they can, at times, fly off the handle. However, it is not in the
Archer's
nature to hold a grudge or let disagreements fester very long.

Sagittarius is ruled by the Planet Jupiter (Luck). Expansion is the key word
here;
as both partners enjoy the acquisition of knowledge, they will carry over
exciting
ideas into their relationship. They must be mindful of over-indulgences, as
such
gluttony will only distract them. Their charm and charisma make them a very
pleasant couple not only to one another, but the entire crowd.


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT on 02/11/2000
12:31 PM ---------------------------

"George Rahal" <george.rahal@acnpower.com> on 02/07/2000 03:13:58 PM
To: <Phillip_K_Allen@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: RE: W basis quotes

I'll get back to them on this.  I know we have sent financials to Clinton
Energy...I'll check to see if this is enough.  In the meantime, is it
possible to show me indications on the quotes I asked for?  Please advise.
George

George Rahal
Manager, Gas Trading
ACN Power, Inc.
7926 Jones Branch Drive, Suite 630
McLean, VA 22102-3303
Phone  (703)893-4330 ext. 1023
Fax  (703)893-4390
Cell (443)255-7699

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Phillip_K_Allen@enron.com [mailto:Phillip_K_Allen@enron.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 07, 2000 5:54 PM
> To: george.rahal@acnpower.com
> Subject: Re: W basis quotes
>
>
>
> George,
>
>      Can you please call my credit desk at 713-853-1803.  They have not
> received any financials for ACN Power.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Phillip Allen
>
>


Please plan to meet on Wed. (see below) to discuss the Deal Profitability Analysis with Kim Kouri.

Thanks, Kim.

PS.  Sean, please forward this to Richard.  For some reason, I could not find him in the email directory.  Thanks.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Robertson, Audrey
Sent:	Thursday, September 06, 2001 8:29 AM
To:	Kouri, Kim; Watson, Kimberly
Cc:	Robertson, Audrey
Subject:	RE: Meeting on TW Deal Profitability/Analysis

Kim and Kim, pleae note, Wednesday, September 12, 3:00 p.m. has been scheduled for your TW Deal Profitability/Analysis meeting.  Please meet in EB-4180.

adr

Audrey D. Robertson
Transwestern Pipeline Company
email address:  audrey.robertson@enron.com
(713) 853-5849
(713) 646-2551 Fax

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kouri, Kim
Sent:	Thursday, September 06, 2001 8:08 AM
To:	Robertson, Audrey
Subject:	RE: Meeting on TW Deal Profitability/Analysis

Either day looks good to me, however I am on jury duty starting Monday Sept. 10th.  I will give you a call.
Thanks
Kim
 --- [Kouri, Kim]   --Original Message-----
From: 	Robertson, Audrey
Sent:	Tuesday, September 04, 2001 3:05 PM
To:	Kouri, Kim
Subject:	RE: Meeting on TW Deal Profitability/Analysis

Kim, Kim Watson would like to know if you are available to meet on next week, Tuesday, pm or Wednesday, pm.  She expects that more of her group will be in and able to attend as well.

Just call me, x35849.

Thanks for your patience Kim.

adr

Audrey D. Robertson
Transwestern Pipeline Company
email address:  audrey.robertson@enron.com
(713) 853-5849
(713) 646-2551 Fax

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kouri, Kim
Sent:	Tuesday, September 04, 2001 9:55 AM
To:	Robertson, Audrey
Subject:	RE: Meeting on TW Deal Profitability/Analysis

Thanks, I will be out of the office today starting at 1 p.m. and returning Thursday a.m.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Robertson, Audrey
Sent:	Tuesday, September 04, 2001 9:45 AM
To:	Kouri, Kim
Subject:	RE: Meeting on TW Deal Profitability/Analysis

Kim, I will get with Kim Watson this morning and finalize a date and time.

adr

Audrey D. Robertson
Transwestern Pipeline Company
email address:  audrey.robertson@enron.com
(713) 853-5849
(713) 646-2551 Fax

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kouri, Kim
Sent:	Tuesday, September 04, 2001 9:39 AM
To:	Robertson, Audrey
Cc:	Asante, Ben
Subject:	FW: Meeting on TW Deal Profitability/Analysis

Audrey, any luck on getting a date and time to meet with Kimberly Watson for about half an hour on the TW Deal Profitability/Analysis Model?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Watson, Kimberly
Sent:	Wednesday, August 29, 2001 9:26 AM
To:	Kouri, Kim
Cc:	Robertson, Audrey
Subject:	RE: Meeting on TW Deal Profitability/Analysis

I will ask Audrey to coordinate our calendars for marketing.  We will let you know.  Thanks, Kim.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kouri, Kim
Sent:	Wednesday, August 29, 2001 9:09 AM
To:	Watson, Kimberly; Asante, Ben
Subject:	FW: Meeting on TW Deal Profitability/Analysis

Kimberely, please let me know what date and time are good for you.
Thanks
Kim
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kouri, Kim
Sent:	Monday, August 20, 2001 12:05 PM
To:	Watson, Kimberly
Cc:	Asante, Ben
Subject:	Meeting on TW Deal Profitability/Analysis

Confirming our conversation to meet next week to discuss the TW Deal Profitability/Analysis Model, I am free all week.  I would also like to invite Ben Asante too.
Thanks
Kim Kouri


HPL Mtg per Lillian Carroll


When: Occurs every Tuesday and Thursday effective 12/13/2001 until 12/27/2001 from 9:00 AM to 10:00 AM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada).
Where: 45c2

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Bridge Line Information
Domestic 800-745-1000
International  801-977-0648
Code 8531935


**Clarification**

Harassment Prevention Training

This training is mandatory for all Enron employees employed since the last
seminar was conducted  in late 1998 or early 1999.  Those who have already
attended Enron harassment avoidance training will be offered a refresher
course in avoiding and preventing harassment.

To contribute our personal best at ENRON, our conduct must promote respectful
and co-operative work relationships. Workplace harassment conflicts with
ENRON's vision and values and violates Company policy.  Harassment also can
violate federal and state laws.  By understanding what harassment is and its
potential harm, we can prevent it in our workplace.

During this training you will:

 Be able to recognize harassment
 Learn to take precautions against being harassed
 Learn to avoid being considered a harasser
 Know how to address a situation involving harassment
 Learn how harassment prevention is consistent with ENRON values

Please click here (  )  to sign up for the session of your choice.    If you
have problems registering or have any questions, please call 713 853-0357.

We are pleased to announce that all employees of EWS and EES will receive
harassment prevention training.

The dates and times available for the sessions are:

 Friday, Feb 23; 1:00 - 2:30; 2:45 - 4:15
  Monday Mar 5; 1:00 - 2:30; 2:45 - 4:15; 4:30 - 6:00

All training sessions will be held in the LaSalle Room at the DoubleTree
Hotel.
There is a $50 charge for each attendee in the training session.


FYI- I declined this invite today- since we have tailgating etc going on Sat - I figured we had enough to keep us busy.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Quigley/HOU/EES on 10/12/2001 09:19 AM ---------------------------

	Enron Energy Services  From:  Kay Quigley                           10/09/2001 09:13 AM Phone No: 713 853-9735

To:	Dutch Quigley/Enron@EnronXGate
cc:
Subject:	Phillip's B-Day

This sounds fun- this is a guy (a new power rep) on my team - his wife works in RAC with Rebecca Phillips
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Quigley/HOU/EES on 10/09/2001 09:12 AM ---------------------------
From:	Monica Reasoner/ENRON@enronXgate on 10/08/2001 04:42 PM
To:	"Lee, Michael H." <Mike.Lee@COMPAQ.com>@SMTP@enronXgate, "Bill Konrath (E-mail)" <william_konrath@aimfunds.com>@SMTP@enronXgate, "Cheryl Fundersol (E-mail)" <cfundersol@yahoo.com>@SMTP@enronXgate, "Joe Huber (E-mail)" <JHuber@pkftexas.com>@SMTP@enronXgate, "John Perez (E-mail)" <jlperez@karnesec.net>@SMTP@enronXgate, "Kathryn Carter (E-mail)" <Kathryn.Carter@SW.Boeing.com>@SMTP@enronXgate, "Steve Strubbe (E-mail)" <stevestrubbe@hotmail.com>@SMTP@enronXgate, Deborah Heath/ENRON@enronXgate, Veronica Gonzalez/ENRON@enronXgate, Maribel Monterrey/ENRON@enronXgate, aaranda@crtlaw.com@SMTP@enronXgate, Antonio_Urrutia@amat.com@SMTP@enronXgate, tradfurn@aol.com@SMTP@enronXgate, "Evetts, Beau MB SITI-IT-DSAD" <bevetts@Shell.Com>@SMTP@enronXgate, billkonrath@earthlink.net@SMTP@enronXgate, ron.pruitt@placemark.com@SMTP@enronXgate, "Christian Pruitt (work)" <cpruitt@allynco.com>@SMTP@enronXgate, cheath@calpine.com@SMTP@enronXgate, Brian Dafferner/HOU/EES@EES, Kelvin Daniels/HOU/EES@EES, Mary Jo Johnson/HOU/EES@EES, Kay Quigley/HOU/EES@EES, Jack Wise/HOU/EES@EES, Jodi Thrasher/HOU/EES@EES, rjwpaw@ev1.net@SMTP@enronXgate
cc:
Subject:	Phillip's B-Day


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 12/17/99
01:39 PM ---------------------------

"conferences" <eps.conf@univ-mulhouse.fr> on 12/17/99 02:37:08 AM
To: eps.conf@univ-mulhouse.fr
cc:  (bcc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT)
Subject: New website for an exciting conference

Applications of Physics in Financial Analysis 2
Liege, Belgium
13 to 15 July 2000

The website for this conference is now available at
www.eps.org/apfa

For further details on all EPS conferences contact: Christine Bastian,
Conferences, European Physical Society, 34 rue Marc Seguin, BP 2136, F-68060
Mulhouse Cedex, France
tel +33 389 32 94 42 fax +33 389 32 94 49
email eps.conf@univ-mulhouse.fr

This conference is a Europhysics Conference.It is organised by the European
Physical Society and its division of statistical and non-linear physics.

 - att1.htm


To avoid losing info in the shuffle of the move, we are waiting until Monday morning to hand out the folders.  However, I'm attaching p&l, positions, prices and VAR for you to view until we get your individual information to you on Monday.

Thanks and have a great weekend.

Casey


<4DDE116DBCA1D3118B130080C840BAAD02CD53@ppims.Services.McMaster.CA>
From: "Wesko, George" <gwesko@PPIMS.SERVICES.MCMASTER.CA>
To: strawbale@crest.org
Subject: RADIANT HEATING
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2000 11:28:29 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
------_=_NextPart_001_01BF56D0.C002317E
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: owner-strawbale@crest.org
Precedence: bulk

There are a number of excellent sites for radiant heating, including the
magazine fine homebuilding June-July 1992 issue: the Radiant Panel
Association;  ASHRAE  Chapter 6;   Radiantec-Radiant heating system from
Radiantec;  the following web site:  http://www.twapanels.ca/heating
index.html

The above is a good start, and each of the sites have a number of good
links.  Let me know how you make out in your search.


This is truly traveling all around the world!

-----Original Message-----
From: Agnieszka Stepnikowska -Berns [mailto:asb@psiph.pl]
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 2:26 AM
To: Doris, Kinga
Subject: PD:

----- Original Message -----
From: Renata Jachimek <renata_j@poczta.onet.pl>
To: Artur Zapalowski <zapalow@yahoo.com>; Tomek Zaj?c <jora@it.com.pl>;
Marysia Wanat <38561522@pro.onet.pl>; Adam Waluch <vtteam@waw.pdi.net>; Ania
Walicka <anawalca@it.com.pl>; Anna-Maria Tymosz <annamaria_t@iname.com>;
Piotr Sut <transam@lodz.pdi.net>; Agnieszka Stcpnikowska-Berns
<asb@psiph.pl>; Ola Sobczak <OlaGSobczak@zigzag.pl>; Ola Niemirycz
<aniem@poczta.wp.pl>; Anna Minczewska <anna@amp.pl>; Krzysztof Mieczkowski
<kmtransl@yahoo.com>; Jarek Mateuszczyk <jarekm65@pro.onet.pl>; Iza Maszczyk
<maszczyk@it.com.pl>; Marcin _akomski <mlakomski@zigzag.pl>; Jacek Lawrecki
<lawrecki@yahoo.de>; Tomek Kulesza <tomek.k@chosen.com.pl>; Bogdan
Janczewski <e_pulawska@hotmail.com>; Andrzej Grz?dkowski
<andrzejtkt@zigzag.pl>; Anna Farin <patkon@elektron.pl>; Witek Czartoryski
<ypsilon@polbox.com>; Beata Baduchowska <bemika@qdnet.pl>; Bohdan
Ambroziewicz <alienboh@poczta.onet.p
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2000 1:15 PM
Subject: Fw:

> Czego to czowiek nie robi, _eby sobie trochc poprawi+ _ycie!?> ----- Original Message -----?> From: "Iwona" <iwonatha@ambasada.tajlandia.ids.pl>?> To: "Renata Jachimek" <renata_j@poczta.onet.pl>?> Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2000 2:51 PM?>?>?> > Maj dir frend - a oto i kilka wskazowek jak zyc?> > Iwona?> >?> > Instructions for Life in the new millennium?> > from the Dalai Lama:?> >?> >?> > 1. Take into account that great love and great?> >     achievements involve great risk.?> >?> > 2. When you lose, don't lose the lesson.?> >?> > 3. Follow the three Rs: Respect for self,?> >     respect for others?> >     responsibility for all your actions.?> >?> > 4. Remember that not getting what you want is?> >     sometimes a wonderful stroke of luck.?> >?> > 5. Learn the rules so you know how to break?> >     them properly.?> >?> > 6. Don't let a little dispute injure a great?> >     friendship.?> >?> > 7. When you realize you've made a mistake,?> >     take immediate steps to?> >     correct it.?> >?> > 8. Spend some time alone every day.?> >?> > 9. Open your arms to change, but don't let go?> >     of your values.?> >?> > 10. Remember that silence is sometimes the?> >     best answer.?> >?> > 11. Live a good, honorable life. Then when you?> >     get older and think back, you'll be able to enjoy it a second?> > time.?> >?> > 12. A loving atmosphere in your home is the?> >     foundation for your life.?> >?> > 13. In disagreements with loved ones, deal?> >     only with the current?> >     situation. Don't bring up the past.?> >?> > 14. Share your knowledge.?> >     It's a way to achieve immortality.?> >?> > 15. Be gentle with the earth.?> >?> > 16. Once a year, go someplace you've never?> >      been before.?> >?> > 17. Remember that the best relationship is one?> >     in which your love for each?> >     other exceeds your need for each other.?> >?> > 18. Judge your success by what you had to give?> >     up in order to get it.?> >?> > 19. Approach love and cooking with reckless?> >     abandon.?> >?> >?> > Do not keep this message. The mantra must?> > leave your hands within 96 hours.?> > You will get a very pleasant surprise (this is?> > true even if you are not superstitious)?> > if you send it to:?> >?> >?> > 0-4 people: Your life will improve slightly.?> >?> >?> > 5-9 people: Your life will improve to your liking.?> >?> >?> > 9-14 people: You will have at least 5?> >                 surprises in the next 3 weeks.?> >?> >?> > 15 people and above: Your life will improve?> >                         drastically and everything you?> >                         ever dreamed of will begin to take shape.?> >?> >?> >?>?>


Dear Traveler,

We at Expedia.com would like to learn more about your experience booking a hotel on our Web site, as well as your subsequent stay. To take our Expedia Hotel Survey, please click on the URL below. The survey will take about 5 minutes.

This Expedia survey is strictly a research project initiated solely by and for Expedia.com. Your identity and any information you provide will be kept confidential. We will study results only in the aggregate. Your information will never be bought, sold, rented, or used to sell you products or services.

We sincerely appreciate your time, and look forward to repaying your effort with information that will make your future Expedia hotel bookings easier, and your stays more enjoyable.

Thank you!
Expedia.com

Go to: http://deploy.ztelligence.com/index.jsp?PIN=C2WSFBZ9W6NC
Please click this link now (or go online and retype it into your Web location).

AOL USERS:  We encourage you to minimize the AOL window and to use a browser such as Netscape, Internet Explorer (non-AOL version) when participating in CLIENT surveys. These browsers connect DIRECTLY to our surveys, thereby producing a faster connection and a better overall experience. If you would prefer to use the AOL browser, however, then please use the following link:
 Survey


Eric, these are already in my list that I sent you.

Kay

"Thompson, Peter J." <peterthompson@akllp.com> on 11/20/2000 10:53:15 AM
To: <eric.boyt@enron.com>
cc: "Kay Mann (E-mail)" <kay.mann@enron.com>

Subject: FW: Additional Information for GE Contract

Here are some additional info requests that I just sent to Kay Mann.

>  -----Original Message-----
> From:    Thompson, Peter J.
> Sent:   Monday, November 20, 2000 11:40 AM
> To:   Kay Mann (E-mail)
> Subject:   Additional Information for GE Contract
>
> I also need the following information that I requested in my 11/17
> e-mail:
>
> 1.   Payee and Address for Invoices referenced in Section 6.7.2 of
> the Agreement
>
> 2.   Section 6.7.1 Agreement reference
>


Steve, I understand that you are developing a campaign for California,
considering all of media attention that has been placed on this state.  I
publish a weekly deregulation report and it contains some information that
may prove useful.  The report is attached.

Frank


That's it for now.

Kay

From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 09/05/2000 10:07 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: GE meeting

Change all calls to 1:30 p.m. Central?

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	09/05/2000 10:04 AM

		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: GE meeting

I just spoke to Sheila and she told me 130 Central, on Wednesdays.

From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 09/05/2000 09:54 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: GE meeting

Sheila when do you want to reschedule this call?

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	09/05/2000 08:41 AM

		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: GE meeting

Suz,

Please cancel the 930/Wednesday conference call, as we are changing the
time.  Please confirm with Sheila what time we will have the call this week.

Thanks,

Kay


Samantha Boyd is enrolled in Wellhead to Burner Tip

Class Days and Times:
  6/13/2000  08:00:00 AM - 05:00:00 PM
  6/14/2000  08:00:00 AM - 12:00:00 PM
Participant Fee: $600.00

Thank you for your support in providing quality and cost effective
development opportunites at Enron.
Your Company and RC will be charged $600.00

If you have any questions, please call the Development Center Team at
713-853-0357.

Thank you.


Marie,

Please leave Leslie a voice mail if you sent the Reliant Master Netting Agreement.  Leslie is locked out of her e-mail at home.

Thanks,
Martha Keesler
Assistant to Leslie Hansen
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	drusso@reliant.com@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, October 30, 2001 3:03 PM
To:	Hansen, Leslie
Subject:	Re: Master Netting

thanks so much
i know you are busy and i appreciate you getting this to us

Dede Russo
Senior Attorney
Reliant Energy Law Department
P.O. Box 1384
Houston, TX  77251-1384
1111 Louisiana St., Suite 4300 (77002)
Phone: (713) 207-5240
E-Mail: drusso@reliant.com
Fax: (713) 207-0161

The preceding e-mail message contains information that is confidential, may
be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may
constitute non-public information.  It is intended to be conveyed only to
the designated recipient(s).  If you are not an intended recipient of this
message, please do not read, copy or disclose the contents of this
communication to others and please notify the sender at (713) 207-5241.  If
you are not the intended recipient, we would appreciate your forwarding the
message back to us and deleting it from your system. Unauthorized use,
dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this message is strictly
prohibited and may be unlawful.  Thank you.

                    "Hansen,
                    Leslie"               To:     <drusso@reliantenergy.com>
                    <Leslie.Hansen@       cc:
                    enron.com>            Subject:     Master Netting

                    10/30/2001
                    02:38 PM

I've asked Marie Heard, one of our legal assistants, to send you a draft
of the Master Netting Agreement as soon as it is ready -- most likely
today.  I will have to customize for Reliant, but at least you can start
looking at the agreement.

leslie

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


----- Forwarded by Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT on 03/27/2001 02:46 PM -----

	"Townsend, George" <gtownsend@manorisd.net>
	03/27/2001 09:11 AM

		 To: "'Gerald.Nemec@enron.com'" <Gerald.Nemec@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: Hey Bud

Puto,

What's going on dude? Antigua was awesome. I survived it without a problem.
Heather moving in has been a different story. I didn't realize how much
"stuff" you could pack into a one bedroom apartment. How is your love life.
The gal from the wedding was pretty hot. Are you still chasing that? Lets
get together soon. Our extra bedroom is nicer now. My old bed got tossed in
a dumpster. It smelled like shit.

Talk to you later
GT

-----Original Message-----
From: Gerald.Nemec@enron.com [mailto:Gerald.Nemec@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2001 4:12 PM
To: gtownsend@manorisd.net
Subject: Hey Bud

How is it going?  Did you survive the honeymoon?


As we discussed, please let me know if you think the reporter would benefit
from a follow-up conversation
with Scott Gahn - commodity market expert.
Thanks
Peggy

Mona L Petrochko@ENRON
11/27/2000 08:45 PM

To:   Peggy Mahoney/HOU/EES@EES
cc:   Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, jdasovic@.enron.com, Sandra
      McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron@ENRON, Marcie
      Milner/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Paul Kaufman, Lysa Akin/PDX/ECT@ECT, Mary
      Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan Comnes, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject:  FW: Interview w/LA Times/Edelman PR Contact List/Tomorrow Consume
      r Advocates Announce Their Energy Plan

I participated in a call with Nancy Vogel, energy reporter from the LA
Times, today and 2 other ARM members, Peter Bray, The New Power Company and
Rick Counihan, Green Mountain.  The conversation was mostly to provide
background on retail issues.  I emphasized that Peter and Rick were the
spokespeople for the coalition and I was there for background purposes
only.  She was very receptive and seemed to grasp the importance of
developing a retail market.

We discussed how AB 1890 was mostly geared toward developing a competitive
wholesale market and provided very little guidance about retail market
structure.  We discussed that during the rate freeze, there was no impetus
for consumers to shop, so long as they were insulated from market prices.
We also stated that the transition period was used more for ensuring
stranded cost recovery and not for developing a retail market structure.
We said that we have been raising the lack of retail market structure in
various proceedings at the CPUC.  Now that deregulation is center stage in
the administration, and likely the legislature, we feel it is important to
include retail competition as a solution to the problems in the market
today.

There was discussion about the utilities being required to purchase on a
spot basis through the PX and passing those costs directly to consumers.
With the spikes over the summer, consumers in San Diego revolted against
such substantial increases, without notice.  Because the retail market was
essentially undeveloped, consumers didn't know they had somewhere else to
go for relief.

Nancy asked why the retail market has not developed.

Rick responded that some of the authors of the legislation either believed
that competition at the wholesale level would provide adequate benefits to
consumers and therefore retail competition was not valuable or that the
rate freeze, insulation from price increases, was an adequate quid pro quo
to utility recovery of stranded costs.  Regulators have moved very slowly
on cost separation issues, allowing the utilities to continue to recover
the costs of their retail services through distribution rates from all
customers, make their prices appear to be cheaper.  Lastly, neither the
legislature nor the Commission determined what the utilities role in the
new restructured environment would be:  are they a pipes/wires company, are
they facilitators for direct access, are they competitors?

We explained that we believe there is a strong reason to define the
utilities obligation to serve residential and small commercial customers
now.  Large customers can take care of themselves.  Why is this important?
As the utilities enter into contracts, they need clarity on for whom they
have an obligation to purchase.  This minimizes any potential for future
stranded cost claims any claims that the utilities could make absent such
direction up front.  Secondly, it reduces the utilities ability to charge
an exit fee or other financial claim on departing customers who decide to
go direct access.

The next piece of the puzzle would be to define the default service for
residential and small commercial customers.  The utility would provide a
fixed-rate product to small residential and commercial customers for a
transitional period of time.  Based upon the San Diego experience, it is
politically imperative that smaller customers have rate certainty.  This
also provides a target against which other service providers can compete.
The utility's price is a fixed price with no true-up.  The utility would
have purchasing flexibility to meet the target price.  The price could be
set by the CPUC.  A certain portion of the utility's purchases will still
be met through spot market purchaes.  Customer migration, res and small
commercial, should not be an issue.

The last piece of the puzzle would be to encourage competition for the
default provider role, ala PECO, where 20% of the residential customers
went through an auction process.  (This issues is important to Shell and
The New Power Company.)

She seemed very interested in the issue, recognized that no one else was
talking about it and she may want to follow up with individuals later.
Getting customer affadavits would be another indicator of value for
developing a retail market that would be helpful for our PR efforts with
ARM and Edelman and for responding to press inquiries.

---------------------- Forwarded by Mona L Petrochko/NA/Enron on 11/27/2000
08:12 PM ---------------------------

"Fairchild, Tracy" <tracy.fairchild@edelman.com> on 11/27/2000 08:10:46 PM

To:   "Aaron Thomas (E-mail)" <athomas@newenergy.com>, "Andrea Weller
      (E-mail)" <aweller@sel.com>, "andrew Chau (E-mail)"
      <anchau@shellus.com>, "Bill Chen (E-mail)" <bchen@newenergy.com>,
      "Douglas Oglesby (E-mail)" <doao@chevron.com>, "Jeffrey Hanson
      (E-mail)" <jeff.hanson@phaser.com>, "jennifer Chamberlin (E-mail)"
      <jnnc@chevron.com>, "john Barthrop (E-mail)"
      <jbarthrop@electric.com>, "John Leslie (E-mail)" <jleslie@luce.com>,
      "Joseph Alamo (E-mail)" <jalamo@enron.com>, "Kathleen Magruder
      (E-mail)" <kmagruder@newpower.com>, "Marcie Milner (E-mail)"
      <Marcie.Milner@enron.com>, "'Michael Nelson'" <mnelson@electric.com>,
      "Mona Petrochko (E-mail)" <mpetroch@enron.com>, "Peter Bray (E-mail)"
      <pbray@newpower.com>, "Rebecca Schlanert (E-mail)"
      <rschlanert@electric.com>, "Richard Counihan (E-mail)"
      <rick.counihan@greenmountain.com>, "Sue Mara (E-mail)"
      <smara@enron.com>
cc:   "Beiser, Megan" <Megan.Beiser@edelman.com>, "Allen, Stevan"
      <stevan.allen@edelman.com>, "Manuel, Erica"
      <Erica.Manuel@edelman.com>, "Warner, Jami" <jami.warner@edelman.com>,
      "Fairchild, Tracy" <tracy.fairchild@edelman.com>

Subject:  FW: Interview w/LA Times/Edelman PR Contact List/Tomorrow Consume
      r Advocates Announce Their Energy Plan

I shall try this again--with the attachment this time.

>  Hello to the ARM Team,
>
> Peter, Rick and Mona did an excellent job briefing LA Times reporter
Nancy
> Vogel on retail energy markets, ARM and ARM's recommendations for changes
> to the current retail markets.  She has just finished what she terms her
> "opus" on dereg and admitted that she has avoided retail up to now and
> said "but the fact that you guys came to see me means I can't do that
> anymore."  She was pleased to be the first reporter to be approached by
> the retail side of the industry to explain "our side of the story" and
> will definitely be in touch with ARM folks in the future regarding
> possible stories.
>
> Attached you will find your contact list for the Edelman team.  Please
> respond with your cell phone, pager and home phone #s as well as the
names
> of your assistant and his/her phone number, if applicable.  We are
> available to you at all times, so please do not hesitate to use the home
> phone numbers that we have provided if you find it necessary.
>
> Heads Up Announcement: California's consumer groups are banding together
> tomorrow for an 11 a.m. Capitol Press conference in Room 1190 to make an
> announcement regarding dereg policy--it is assumed that they will be
> kicking off another initiative-though this has not been confirmed.
>
>  <<ARM Contact List.doc>>
> Tracy Fairchild
> Account Supervisor
> Edelman Public Relations Worldwide
> (916) 442-2331
> tracy.fairchild@edelman.com
>

(See attached file: ARM Contact List.doc)

 - ARM Contact List.doc


Gentlemen:
Just a few lines to let you know about my decision to leave my position as
Vice President and General Manager Latin America and Caribbean at Network
Associates. I am aware about Enron's current and future expansion plans in
the IT arena worldwide, and there is no a doubt in my mind that you are in
need of good telented people to help you growing your overall IT business.

I am attaching to this e-mail a copy of my Resume outlining my qualifications
for your review and consideration. Please feel free to contact me at
954-452-0664 should any of you have a questions. Looking forward to talking
to all of you soon. Best regards, Herbert Arturo Molina

 - Herbert.PDF


Could you please together a confidentiality agreement for the following company:

Metron Steel, a dba of Primary Steel, Inc.

Please let me know if you need anything else.
Thanks,
r


Start Date: 4/23/01; HourAhead hour: 6;  HourAhead schedule download failed.
Manual intervention required.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042306.txt

---- Generation Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE.
     Details: (Hour: 6 / Preferred:  29.00 / Final:  28.97)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ARCO
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/23/01
  UNIT_ID: CARBGN_6_UNIT 1


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Dawson, Sherry
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 11:21 AM
To:	McLaughlin Jr., Errol
Subject:	FW: DKR monetization

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dyk, Russell
Sent:	Wednesday, November 21, 2001 10:04 AM
To:	Dawson, Sherry
Cc:	Zivic, Robyn
Subject:	DKR monetization

Sherry -
As you can see from the attached, all but $109,630 of AIG's combined position is natural gas related. Give me a call if you have any other questions.
Have a great Thanksgiving.
Rgds,
Russ


Good Morning,

Please provide your estimate for this week's AGA storage survey.

Here are this week's stats:

AGA Last Year       +56
5 yr AVG            +83
Lifetime High            +120 1994  ALL TIME HIGH
Lifetime Low             +56  2000
Gas in STGE              1182
5yr AVG             1284
+/- to 2000              -36
+/- to 5yr AVG           -102

Please have your estimates in by Noon (11:00 CST) tomorrow.  Thanks.

(Embedded image moved to file: pic04691.pcx)

(Embedded image moved to file: pic04710.pcx)

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et toutes les pieces jointes (ci-apres le "message") sont etablis a l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires et sont confidentiels. Si vous recevez ce message par erreur, merci de le detruire et d'en avertir immediatement l'expediteur.

Toute utilisation de ce message non conforme a sa destination, toute diffusion ou toute publication, totale ou partielle, est interdite, sauf autorisation expresse.

L'internet ne permettant pas d'assurer l'integrite de ce message, BNP PARIBAS (et ses filiales) decline(nt) toute responsabilite au titre de ce message, dans l'hypothese ou il aurait ete modifie.
	----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message and any attachments (the "message") are intended solely for the addressees and are confidential. If you receive this message in error, please delete it and immediately notify the sender.

Any use not in accord with its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited except formal approval.

The internet can not guarantee the integrity of this message. BNP PARIBAS (and its subsidiaries) shall (will) not therefore be liable for the message if modified.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 - pic04691.pcx
 - pic04710.pcx


As requested, here is the current draft of the Midway LOI.  The counter party
has not seen this draft yet, so this is still preliminary.

I'm reviewing the term sheet re toll.

Kay


Steve, Diomedes is going to jump all over me for even sending the ESA memo to
Metts.  I told him that this message affects more than us and he thinks he
has free reign within his region.  I am vacillating about whether to include
the paragraph I put in  bold, but I do want everyone to know just how
different this is from the sale of one asset.  The implications are much
broader and we don't want to come off looking dishonest to our own people.
And believe me, the rumors are out there.  I just don't want to make it worse
instead of better and that is my principle concern.  In terms of the market
finding out, we always say that our assets are always for sale so I don't
think we are giving away anything new.

I have a draft of the proposed Office of the Chairman letter, (a DC version
and a DH version) but need the Skilling input on what our international
strategy  is.  I am caught here between a rock (DC) and a hard place (DH) and
I really feel like we need the direction.  Both of them have been calling
Skilling and we need to take his temperature.  If the message it the one
Diomedes thinks it is, we definitely will not want to issue an all employee
memo.  We would be telling about half the international people that there is
no future for them.

Whew!  That's it for now.  My mission tomorrow is getting every possible
question written for Jim for e-speak so he doesn't say something he should
not.


So the impaler might not have been too dramatic!  Have fun tonight!

Alexandra Saler@EES
12/11/2000 04:57 PM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re:

how about Ali "I hate PMS" Saler?

To: Alexandra Saler/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Re:

How about Ali "the impaler" Saler?  Or is that too dramatic?


Enron opens an office in Japan.  Get the details in eBiz.

Also in this issue:
FERC suggests overhaul for California
ENA's focus on upstream services
Cyber Cafe in Dabhol

It's all in the latest eBiz.  Go to home.enron.com, click Publications, then
click eBiz, and "eBiz November 3, 2000."


Don't know what you are talking about.  They gave Sylvia their form with
their view of how the world should revolve around their wishes in October
2000.  She sent it up here is late January for Legal's initial review.  I
understand it mimics the Utilicorp agreement.  If you have some incite that
would lead you to believe that they would sign our Master, please send me a
credit worksheet so that I can prepare a Master Firm Purchase/Sale
Agreement.  Also please give me a contact so that we can forward the new
contract to that person for execution.
----- Forwarded by Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT on 02/12/2001 09:09 AM -----

	Debra Perlingiere
	02/09/2001 05:37 PM

		 To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: EnergyOne Ventures LP

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490

----- Forwarded by Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT on 02/09/2001 05:37 PM -----

	Russell Diamond
	02/09/2001 03:26 PM

		 To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant
Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Sylvia S Pollan/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: EnergyOne Ventures LP

To All:

Please provide myself and Sylvia updates on the ISDA and Master Firm Purchase
Sale contract negotiation with EnergyOne Ventures LP.  Sylvia is looking to
transact with this counterparty and they are willing to sign our contracts.

Thanks
Russell


Sue Mara was correct on the call yesterday.  While the PUC meets regularly on
Thursdays, it appears they are having a meeting today at which the "Bilas
Alternative" is up for a vote.  Our information is that there is some
likelihood that the decision will be approved----but please don't hold your
breath.  We'll disseminate information just as soon as we get it.

Best,
Jeff


Here is the information that you needed:  My tickets were electronic and the
confirmation number was NGP6MP.  Thank You.


---------------------- Forwarded by Ann M Schmidt/Corp/Enron on 03/29/2000
01:14 PM ---------------------------

Missy Stevens
03/29/2000 12:58 PM
To: Ann M Schmidt/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Problem Solving

Hi - I can't find that buzz word bingo thing, but I did find this...  :)

---------------------- Forwarded by Missy Stevens/Corp/Enron on 03/29/2000
12:57 PM ---------------------------

John Walt
09/01/99 03:55 PM
To: Missy Stevens/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Problem Solving

Is this the process you have put in place for budgeting?

 - problem-.jpg


Hey it's too late for you.  There was a Thursday night game and your rules state, and I quote "During weeks of Thursday night games, all picks will need to be in by noon on Thursday."  Therefore see you later, and thanks for playing.  Sorry, but rules are rules.  Happy Hour Friday 10/26.

-----Original Message-----
From: Williams, Bob [mailto:Bob.Williams@ElPaso.com]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:45 AM
To: Bevans, Larry; Dave Heinemen; Dougherty, Nathan; Jernigan, Steven ;
Jerry Padilla; Joey Brewer; LoreLei Reid; Paul Lucci; Pike, Steven;
Turner, Robert; Williams, Bob; Woodruff, Alexander
Subject: Bob Picks Indy

Get you picks in.  Also please note Larry Bevans will be receiving the picks
next week, I will be out of town.  Larry's e-mail address is
larry.bevans@elpaso.com. Don't forget if you don't send something to me you
are out of the pool.  Bob

******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso
Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the
use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the
sender.
******************************************************************


Hello, Rosie!   Stan has this on his calendar and will attend.

Have a great weekend,
Cindy

Rosalee Fleming on 12/01/2000 02:56:08 PM
To: James M Bannantine/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Cliff
Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sanjay Bhatnagar/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Jeremy Blachman/HOU/EES@EES, Philippe A Bibi/HOU/ECT@ECT, Raymond
Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael R Brown/LON/ECT@ECT, Harold G
Buchanan/HOU/EES@EES, Rick Buy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Causey/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Diomedes Christodoulou/SA/Enron@Enron, Wade
Cline/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, David Cox/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, James
Derrick/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steve Elliott/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Jim Fallon/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Andrew
S Fastow/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron, Ben F Glisan/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Kevin Hannon/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, David
Haug/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON,
Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron, James A
Hughes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Larry L
Izzo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron,
Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Koenig/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kenneth
Lay/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES,
Danny McCarty/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rebecca
McDonald/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jeffrey McMahon/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mark Metts/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark S Muller/HOU/EES@EES, Cindy
Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lou L Pai/HOU/EES@EES, Ken Rice/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Matthew Scrimshaw/LON/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A
Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey Sherrick/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John
Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, Jeff Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Marty
Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas E White/HOU/EES@EES, G G
Garcia/NA/Enron@Enron, Marcia Manarin/SA/Enron@Enron, Susan
Skarness/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy Guidroz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Beena Pradhan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Karen K
Heathman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sharron Westbrook/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kay
Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Molly Bobrow/NA/Enron@Enron, Rosane
Fabozzi/SA/Enron@Enron, Stephanie Harris/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bridget
Maronge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nicki Daw/NA/Enron@Enron, Inez Dauterive/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Carol Ann Brown/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Elaine
Rodriguez/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Cindy Stark/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Mary E Garza/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Maureen
McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron, Joannie Williamson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Vanessa
Groscrand/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Suzanne Danz/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tori L
Wells/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cathy Phillips/HOU/ECT@ECT, Loretta
Brelsford/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sue Ford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dolores
Fisher/NA/Enron@Enron, Kathy McMahon/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Karen Owens/HOU/EES@EES, Dorothy Dalton/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Mercedes Estrada/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Christina Grow/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lauren
Urquhart/LON/ECT@ECT, Sherri Sera/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Katherine
Brown/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Liz M Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Judy G Smith/HOU/EES@EES,
Peggy McCurley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marsha Schiller/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fiona
Stewart/LON/ECT@ECT, Jana L Paxton/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Connie Blackwood/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Tammie
Schoppe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly Hillis/HOU/ECT@ect, Jennifer Burns/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Sharon Dick/HOU/EES@EES, Beverly Aden/HOU/EES@EES, Kathy Dodgen/HOU/EES@EES,
Kerry Ferrari/LON/ECT@ECT, Carol Moffett/HOU/EES@EES, Jennifer Adams/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Leah Rijo/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Lucy Marshall/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Kathy Campos/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Julie Armstrong/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kathryn
Greer/HOU/EES@EES, Mrudula Gadade/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Brenda
Castillo/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: The Enron Corporate Policy Committee Retreat

Ken and Jeff have decided that the Enron Executive Committee Retreat will
include only the Corporate Policy Committee this year.  (See list of members
below.)  You may be holding the timeframe of January 16-18, 2001 on your
calendar, which you can now free up if you are not on the committee.

The location of the retreat is under consideration.  When a decision is made,
we will get the information to the members of the Corporate Policy
Committee.  Departure for the retreat will be early afternoon on Tuesday,
January 16 with return to Houston late afternoon on Thursday, January 18.

Please don't hesitate to call me if you have any questions at 713-853-6088.

Rosie

Enron Policy Committee

Baxter, Cliff
Causey, Rick
Derrick, Jim
Fastow, Andy
Frevert, Mark
Hannon, Kevin
Horton, Stan
Kean, Steve
Lay, Ken
Pai, Lou
Rice, Ken
Skilling, Jeff
Whalley, Greg


Thanks for the invitation Jeff, however we will decline the offer.? We have
elected to focus our efforts on the Southern Calif. market.

-----Original Message-----
From:?? Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com [SMTP:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com]
Sent:?? Thursday, November 09, 2000 11:02 AM
To:???? craigc@calpine.com; counihan@greenmountain.com; PhilDavies@aec.ca;
jfawcett@enron.com; rochmanm@spurr-remac.org; dcarroll@dbsr.com;
PaulAmirault@aec.ca; ALEXANMS@sce.com; Mark.C.Moench@wgp.twc.com;
tomb@crossborderenergy.com; burkee@cts.com

Subject:???????

Greetings Folks:

As you know, the Gas Accord is coming to an end and PG&E's trying to figure
out where to go from here.? I would argue that what happens with PG&E is
equally, if not more, important as what happens with SoCal.

As you also know, we're faced with a retrograde PUC that, by all accounts,
longs for the "halcyon days" of command-and-control regulation.? As such, I
think it would be very useful, and cost-effective, to pull together the
effective coalition we established in the SoCalGas settlement.

In that coalition, some of us contributed dollars and some contributed
experts.? I think we should employ that approach again.? I asked Mike Day,
who I think most agree, did a pretty good job of representing us in the
SoCal settlement, to make a proposal for representing us in the PG&E case.
Mike's proposal is attached.? Finally, if there's anyone else you think we
ought to include in our coalition, please let me know.

Let me know what you think.

Hope all is well with you and yours.

Best,
Jeff

***************************************************************************

Jeff:

?????????? Goodin, MacBride is willing and able to represent a coalition of
end-users, marketers, and other interested parties in the PG&E Gas Accord
II
proceeding in much the same fashion that it represented multiple parties in
the GRI proceeding in both PG&E and SoCalGas settlements.? We would propose
to split our monthly billings for legal fees and expenses equally between
the parties who agree to join such a coalition.? In exchange for joining
the
coalition, parties would receive frequent updates on the status of
settlement talks and other proceedings, participate in conference calls to
reach decisions on coalition positions, and have the ability to call on the
GMSRD lawyers on the case in order to answer specific questions or provide
any other useful information.

?????????? I envision using several attorneys for various portions of the
proceeding, including using associates and paralegals for research, and
other GMSRD partners with gas experience for preparation of pleadings, etc.
However, most of the face to face negotiating, including working with
Commissioners and advisors as necessary, would be done by myself as lead
partner on the case.? I have attached a fee schedule for the GMSRD
attorneys
who would likely have some involvement in the case.? Because the majority
of
this work will be done in 2001, these rates reflect our new 2001 hourly
fees.? However, in an effort to encourage participation in the coalition,
and because several potential members of the coalition are past or existing
clients, we propose to reduce our standard fees with a 15% discount for all
participants in the coalition.? With this discount, these would be the
lowest fees available to any of our clients in the coming year.

?????????? I have not made any type of estimate of legal expenses for this
proceeding, as it is exceedingly difficult to forecast how protracted the
proceedings will be.? Once we begin participating in the proceeding and we
collectively decide how best to proceed in terms of actual participation in
the case, we can provide frequent budget reports and make more useful
budgetary estimates.? If you require some type of estimation sooner than
that, please let me know.

?????????? Thank you for your interest in using our services.? Please
contact
me directly at (415) 765-8408 if you have any questions.

Mike Day, partner
Goodin, MacBride, Squeri, Ritchie & Day

GMSRD Fee Schedule for Gas Accord II proceedings

Michael Day?????????????????????????????????? $300

James McTarnaghan????????????????????????????? $260

Jeanne Bennett??????????????????????????? $220

Alexandra Ozols??????????????????????????????? $130

Heather Patrick, paralegal???????????????????? $ 85


Hi again,

I just called Mom and told her our plans.  She says Dad has no clue.  She
vacuumed on Monday or Tuesday, and he asked her who she was expecting to
visit the next day. HA HA HA.

I told her that we are all very proud of ourselves for not blowing it.

Dad doesn't know I called today, so I can call him tomorrow when we are on
the way, talk to Mom and let her know when we will be there.  It won't be
that weird for me to call on a Saturday morning.  She say Larry and Beverly
left today, so we can park in their driveway and be sneaky.

I'm so excited!!!

Kay


Jeff, I was talking to Mike Etringer yesterday regarding this subject and he gave me the name of the CFO Ted Craver. I understand that you guys were dealing with John Fielder.

For sure we want to know what they are up to.  I think like all deals in California we are going to run into issues with credit, and probably paper but that would pretty much depend on the counterparty. ( is it edison), or DWR?

It is VERY important that trading and marketing are aware of the hedging activities in a very timely fashion so however we need to ensure that happens will be my plan.

Do you know the CFO ?

regards, BT

-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 6:59 PM
To: Tycholiz, Barry; Miller, Stephanie; Tholt, Jane M.
Subject: FW: Edison's Hedging Proposals Under the Rate Settlement It Reached with the California PUC
Importance: High

FYI.  Edison's filing for approval to hedge power up to $250MM.  If you'd like to get in front of Edison's CFO on this. Let me know.

Best,
Jeff


Duke Energy Asked to Allow Release of Data
Power: Senator says the generator is refusing to make public some information
crucial to the price-gouging probe. Firm says it's complying.
CARL INGRAM
TIMES STAFF WRITER

July 10 2001

SACRAMENTO -- The chairman of a Senate committee probing suspected price
gouging during the California energy crisis charged Monday that Duke Energy
is refusing to allow him to make public information key to his investigation.

Sen. Joe Dunn (D-Santa Ana) said Duke has made the price bidding information
from its Chula Vista plant available to committee members and staffers. But
under a federal confidentiality rule, the data cannot be made public without
Duke's consent.

The documents concern the Chula Vista plant, which former employees have
alleged was ramped up and down to drive up power prices during three days in
January. However, state records show that the agency overseeing the
electricity grid ordered those gyrations to keep the power flowing throughout
the state. Dunn said Duke's refusal thwarts the committee's investigation and
efforts to enact possible remedial legislation because the confidential
information cannot be shared with others in the Legislature or the public.

Dunn said Duke cited a rule of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission that
gives the company the authority to decide which records it makes public and
which stay secret.

"The only one who can release the data is Duke. We agreed to be bound by what
is provided in the FERC tariff, nothing more or less," he said.

Former Employees Tell of Maneuvers

Dunn noted that the committee is considering trying to obtain the information
elsewhere and "release it over Duke's objections."

Three former workers at the Duke plant near Chula Vista testified last month
under oath that the plant, among other things, was ramped up and down in what
seemed to be an effort to maximize revenue during the Jan. 16-18 emergency.

But Duke countered immediately that it had merely obeyed orders of the
California Independent System Operator, which keeps the state's electricity
grid in balance. Duke later provided Cal-ISO documents backing up its
explanation.

Duke executives insisted that the former employees failed to provide a full
picture of the plant's operation during the three days.

But Dunn, chairman of the select Senate committee on alleged price gouging,
said Monday that by refusing to authorize release of all the subpoenaed data,
Duke was guilty of the same tactics.

"Duke is trying to draw the impression that it has [provided] the full
picture. But they are fully aware that we cannot draw any final conclusions
until all that data has been released. That hasn't occurred," Dunn said.

To make a determination whether the Chula Vista power was withheld to drive
up prices, Dunn said, the committee must publicly examine "the bids Duke
submitted from which the ISO issued orders to the plant." They include the
expensive hour-ahead and day-ahead markets, he said.

Duke, a North Carolina-based wholesaler that operates several plants in
California, noted that it considers the information proprietary and
off-limits to legislators not on the committee.

Duke spokesman Tom Williams insisted that the generator is attempting to
comply with the committee's demands. But he was unable to say whether Duke
would agree to make the bidding documents public along with other records the
committee plans to turn over.

"We are complying now," Williams said. "There is some suggestion that we are
leaving stuff out when we have not had a chance to testify. . . . I don't
know what we are ultimately going to do."

The committee had threatened to cite eight wholesale generators unless they
provide pricing and bidding documents by Wednesday. Six, including Duke, have
said they would comply to avoid a contempt citation. Two, Enron and Mirant,
were cited.

Dunn said the committee on Wednesday likely will give companies that are
trying to comply an extra week to do so, but others probably will be formally
charged with contempt in a report to the full Senate. The upper house is the
final arbiter of such issues.

Although there is scant precedent for levying penalties against those cited
for contempt, Dunn said he favors imposing severe fines. In 1929, the most
recent case, a cement company executive was sent to jail.
Copyright 2001, Los Angeles Times

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 09/29/2000
05:26 PM ---------------------------

Vince J Kaminski
09/29/2000 02:03 PM
To: ARSystem@ect.enron.com @ ENRON
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Your Approval is Overdue: Access Request for
tom.halliburton@enron.com

Authorization granted.
The system is not accepting my ID and password.

Vince Kaminski

ARSystem@ect.enron.com on 09/28/2000 07:05:09 PM
To: vince.j.kaminski@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Your Approval is Overdue: Access Request for
tom.halliburton@enron.com

This request has been pending your approval for  2 days.  Please click
http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000003619&Page=
Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000003619
Request Create Date : 9/27/00 9:18:21 AM
Requested For       : tom.halliburton@enron.com
Resource Name       : Unlisted Application/Software
Resource Type       : Applications


Hi Bob,

Any info?

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/26/2001 09:27
AM ---------------------------

"Thompson, Peter J." <pthompson@akllp.com> on 03/26/2001 08:22:32 AM
To: "Kay Mann (E-mail)" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: GE Conference Call

   Has last week's conference call been rescheduled for today?   If
so, please let me know the time and the dial-in number.


fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/10/2001 10:17
AM ---------------------------

"Campbell, Carolyn" <CCampbell@KSLAW.com> on 04/09/2001 04:21:35 PM
To: "'kay.mann@enron.com'" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc: "Keffer, John" <JKeffer@KSLAW.com>

Subject: Delta Timetable

Kay:

Note the following timetable from the final version of the ENA/PPL letter
agreement:

(1)  ENA agreed to use commercially reasonable efforts to deliver the final
form of the turbine contract on or before April 11, 2001.
(2)  The parties agreed to commercially reasonable efforts to execute an
escrow agreement on or before April 16, 2001.
(3)  The escrow account must be funded 3 business days after the later of
(a) ENA's delivery of the final form of the turbine contract and (b) the
closing of PPL's financing.
(4)  ENA can terminate if the escrow is not funded on or before April 19,
2001 (but this date gets pushed back by one business day for each business
day beyond April 11, 2001 that ENA delivers the final form of the turbine
contract).
(5)  The closing occurs at least 5, but not later than 10, business days
after funding the escrow account.
(6)  Either party may terminate if the closing has not occurred on or before
May 3, 2001.

If ENA delivers the final form of the turbine contract on April 11, 2001,
then the April 19, 2001 right to terminate stands.  PPL's obligation to fund
the escrow would then be determined by the date of its loan closing.  Greg
Lang advises that they are working on PPL's financing, but he did not give
an estimated date for financial closing.

I advised Greg on Friday that the legal opinions from both GE and Enron were
causing heartburn.  He agreed to pass this along to Isabel Parker.  He asked
today about GE's reaction to the consent document and if it would be
appropriate for Isabel Parker to contact GE directly at this point.  He also
requested a draft of the escrow disbursement instructions.  When you get a
chance, please advise of any comments in order that we can circulate for
PPL's review.  Also, we need to contact Citibank to clear the proposed form
of escrow agreement (and the anticipated disbursement instructions) and to
negotiate the fee.  Let me know if we can assist in this regard.  Thanks.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King & Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com>

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.


Frank,

I shall catch you tomorrow (Thu) morning with m feedback. I shall be glad to attend
any meeting on Thursday or Friday this week (I am still relatively open).

Sorry for the delay.

Vince
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hayden, Frank
Sent:	Wednesday, May 30, 2001 1:38 PM
To:	Kaminski, Vince J
Cc:	Tamarchenko, Tanya
Subject:	Project X

Vince,
I'm trying to organize a project X update.  Are there any times you would prefer? Also, below is an email form the power desk...it appears that they are going to post correlations...

Any ideas? Feedback?

Thanks,
Frank

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Evans, Casey
Sent:	Wednesday, May 30, 2001 1:10 PM
To:	Hayden, Frank
Cc:	White, Stacey; Vinson, Donald Wayne; McIntyre, Burton
Subject:	VAR Engine question

Frank,

Concerning our ongoing discussions on the proper capture of ancillary and renewable energy credit positions in VAR, I have a proposed solution that I would like to run by you to ensure that proper valuation for these positions will be captured by your VAR engine.  As the positions are marked on their own curve but are valued for VAR purposes using the volatility curves and correlation factors for an energy curve, the VAR on these positions is obviously inaccurate.  As a result, the traders will be setting volatility curves and correlation factors today which will be unique for each ancillary/energy credit position.  All of the correlation factors will be zero and a majority of the volatility curves will be zero, as well.  I simply wanted to ensure that your model would not have a problem with volatilityies or correlations of zero.  I would appreciate your thoughts.

Thanks.
Casey


mine is huge


---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT on 05/10/2001
03:02 PM ---------------------------

"SoRelle, Andrea L" <ASoRelle@h-s.com> on 05/10/2001 02:39:15 PM
To: "'Amy Clemons'" <amy.clemons@enron.com>, "'Anne'" <anneyows@hotmail.com>,
"'Brad'" <bradf@inqueststaffing.com>, "'Caroline'"
<carolinehead@hotmail.com>, "'Karen'" <k1p1@aol.com>,
"'kriscameron@deloitte.com'" <kriscameron@deloitte.com>, "'Marcy'"
<marcyrinehart@hotmail.com>, "'Maggie work'" <mbeery@hillandknowlton.com>,
"'Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com'" <Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com>, "'Rachel'"
<rachelarriola@yahoo.com>, "'Ritter, Robert H.'" <rhritter@utmb.edu>, "'Tara
Levinthal'" <tlevinthal@aol.com>, "Pechersky, Svetlana" <SPechersky@h-s.com>,
"Cohlmeyer, Lisa M" <LCohlmeyer@h-s.com>, "'Shirley Elliott'"
<shirley.s.elliott@citicorp.com>, "'Holly Korman'" <holly@layfam.com>,
"'MATTOSO, ANGELA'" <Amattoso@mdck.com>, "'SAM'" <missshy@texas.net>
cc:

Subject: FW: slut......serves her right haha

-----Original Message-----
From: Stephanie_E_Friedman@reliantenergy.com
[mailto:Stephanie_E_Friedman@reliantenergy.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 2:12 PM
To: ellie.bullard@mail.house.gov; christina@gulfcoastentertainment.com;
lacyprice@henrysmiller.com; kawise@hotmail.com; kafriedman@hotmail.com;
courtneyb@johndaugherty.com; emily1009@yahoo.com;
elizabeth_bowen@aimfunds.com; abradford28@hotmail.com;
alexa_carter@aimfunds.com; abradford28@hotmail.com;
laurasperry@excelonline.com; asorelle@h-s.com; MBowen1025@aol.com;
mgockturtle@mail.utexas.edu; allison.f.blanton@vanderbilt.edu;
AMcGee@thealexandergroup.com; BWare@rnchq.org;
christine_lawhon@amsinc.com; caledere@TexasChildrensHospital.org;
c.domercq@worldnet.att.net; erin.e.fowler@us.arthurandersen.com;
hbuche@kingadvisors.com; jana.m.dupree@us.arthurandersen.com;
jennspinks@aol.com; jsiff@central.uh.edu; jwunz@ncta.com;
lara.wright@bakerhughes.com; laurasperry@excelonline.com;
mbeery@HillandKnowlton.com; mmalone@loomissayles.com;
ssemple@SicolaMartin.com
Subject: slut......serves her right haha

Stephanie E. Friedman
Corporate Tax Department
Stephanie_E_Friedman@reliantenergy.com
(713) 207-3084
----- Forwarded by Stephanie E Friedman/ADM/HouInd on 05/10/01 02:08 PM
-----

                    gemma.moore@us.an

                    dersen.com               To:
Stephanie_E_Friedman@reliantenergy.com
                                             cc:
amanda.gaskin@us.andersen.com,
                    05/10/01 02:06 PM        carrie.a.henke@us.andersen.com,

                                             mgmateer@yahoo.com,

silvia.c.melendez@us.andersen.com,
                                             Rabitbear2@aol.com,
Bear4242@aol.com,
                                             ksm_00_99@yahoo.com,

leticia.ramirez@us.andersen.com,

meredith.riekert@us.pwcglobal.com,
                                             haley.c.smith@us.andersen.com,

                                             wallace_ashley@hotmail.com

                                             Subject:     slut......serves
her right haha

(See attached file: leopard.jpg)

*******************Internet Email Confidentiality Footer*******************

Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message.  If
you
are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for
delivery of
the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to
anyone.
In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender
by
reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your employer does not
consent
to Internet email for messages of this kind.  Opinions, conclusions and
other
information in this message that do not relate to the official business of
my
firm shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.

(See attached file: leopard.jpg)

 - leopard.jpg


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Calcagno, Suzanne
Sent:	Friday, October 12, 2001 10:44 AM
To:	Superty, Robert; Allwein, Robert; Lamadrid, Victor; Garcia, Clarissa; Jaquet, Tammy; Germany, Chris; Townsend, Judy; Cantrell, Rebecca W.; Fulton, Donna; Molinaro, Jeffrey; Greif, Donna; Kelly, Katherine L.; Breese, Mark; Halstead, Lia
Subject:

Hi All--

Attached is the Inside FERC summary of the FERC's order in the Transco 1Line / Order 637 proceeding and in the Texas Gas cash-out proceeding.

Transco is saying they won't implement "prior to April 1" but haven't decided on an implementation and training schedule as of yet. .The Order did not specify a date by which Transco had to implement.  Transco will have to make another filing to comply with this Order, so it may still be a little while before everything is finalized.  Given that the FERC did not speak to the cost of the system in this order (almost $80m), it's likely that the dollars will be subject to the on-going negotiations taking place in Transco's RP01-245 rate case proceeding.   I'll coordinate with Tammy to insure that we've got the necessary EDI testing plan in place and that we make the necessary Unify changes.

On Texas Gas, this represents a minor win for us--we had argued that Texas Gas' proposal was not consistent with Order 637 and that they should adopt a more "Transco-like" scheme that creates uncertainty w/o creating undue penalties.  Texas Gas will have to refile & we'll have another go-round between the marketing companies/producers and the LDC's on the Texas Gas system.  Will keep you posted.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Suzanne
x54880
=============================================================================================================
TRANSCO GETS GREEN LIGHT TO IMPLEMENT 1LINE SYSTEM, OTHER RATE CHANGES

Capping a long-running debate over the 1Line proposal, Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp., with only a minor exception or two, received approval from FERC to implement a new online, interactive computer system. Last month's ruling also went a long way toward completing Transco's effort to comply with orders 637 and 587.  The 1Line system was proposed to enable Transco and other subsidiaries of The Williams Cos. Inc. to put in place new practices and services, including ones related to compliance with orders 637 and 587.

According to Transco, its new scheme cannot be supported by its existing computer systems. But the commission last spring said it was not satisfied with Transco's proposal and asked for a more detailed explanation of how 1Line complies with orders 637 and 587 (IF, 2 April, 16). Looking at the 1Line plan from an order 637 and 587 perspective, FERC in the Sept. 27 order (RP01-236, et al.) found most of the scheme to its liking. It accepted Transco's proposal to change the capacity-release bidding and awarding processes, to incorporate pooling services in its tariff as a new pooling rate schedule, and to provide that any adjustments to a demand bill will be included in a subsequent demand bill, rather than the subsequent commodity bill.

The commission approved Transco's proposal on scheduling equality, which allows shippers acquiring released capacity to submit a nomination at the earliest opportunity after the acquisition of capacity. To raise its comfort level about the provision, FERC directed Transco to change the tariff to permit a shipper's nomination to coincide with the notification of the capacity release transaction and to remove restrictions on the releasing shipper's ability to specify when the release will become effective. FERC also generally was pleased with the provision directing customers to indemnify and hold harmless Transco against all claims. In response to one protester, the commission told the company to remove language that would force customers to indemnify Transco's affiliates as well.

On order 637 matters, FERC was mostly sympathetic to Transco's positions on issues such as imbalance services, operational controls and penalty revenue sharing.
FERC was less enthused with Transco's preferred approach to interaction between the pipeline's segmentation and discounting policies. Refuting the claim that it already complies with order 637 on this issue, FERC directed Transco to add language to its tariff creating a presumption that Transco can rebut a segmenting shipper's right to retain a discounted rate as long as Transco demonstrates that a segmented or secondary point is not similarly situated to point identified in the original transaction. Transco also must add a procedure to its tariff that requires requests to retain discounts to be processed within two hours.

FERC also accepted Transco's existing imbalance cash-out tolerances and tiered cash-out mechanisms, but wanted more information on proposed unauthorized overrun penalties. The pipeline has not ad-equately justified "why such substantial overrun penalties should apply on non-critical days," said the
commission. FERC rejected Transco's proposed transportation charge for imbalance trading, which the pipeline said was needed to recover what it asserts are lost transportation charges. The commission ruled that "Transco has failed to demonstrate that imbalance trades between zones necessarily results in a loss of transportation revenue." But the commission went on to say that it "may be willing to reconsider a remedy if Transco can show that shippers are abusing imbalance trading" to avoid certain charges.

Transco also was directed to justify its proposal to prohibit shippers from trading transportation imbalances and operational balancing agreement imbalances. FERC said that "it is not clear from Transco's explanation why OBA imbalances are so different from shipper transportation imbalances that the two cannot be traded."

=============================================================================================================
FERC ACCEPTED TEXAS GAS' PROPOSAL TO ELIMINATE IMBALANCES on its system by revising its cashout mechanism, while rejecting the proposed use of high/low daily pricing for cashouts. The revamped mechanism, which was developed during and after a technical conference, would enable Texas Gas Transmission Co. to "remove the incentive to engage in price arbitrage on its system," FERC said.

To stop customers from gaming its system, Texas Gas in March proposed (RP01-278) a plan to create a new monthly imbalance tier that would not be subject to cashouts, to eliminate pool-to-pool transfers in the calculation of customer imbalances, and to do away with the provision allowing a processor replacing
plant volume reduction to have its imbalances cashed out at 100% of the applicable index price. Seeing the need for the proposed changes, the commission noted that Texas Gas "has demonstrated with its data a close correlation between the imbalance and price arbitrage that has been taking place for years and has not subsided."

However, FERC rejected the idea of changing the applicable cashout price index at all tier levels to a percentage of either the highest or lowest daily price during the month. Directing Texas Gas to drop the proposed language, the order explained that daily high/low index prices "may unduly increase penalties for imbalances, which is contrary to order 637."

The order went on to say that "a less draconian measure" may be appropriate. For instance, Texas Gas could propose a mechanism "that would inject an element of uncertainty regarding the eventual price" if it wanted to provide "an incentive for shippers to remain in balance," FERC said.


I am advised that some of you have not exhibited the requisite amount of
"pep."  For lawyers and paralegals, you need to pick your reviewers online if
you haven't already done so.  5 or 6 would be sufficient althought the
computer lets you pick up to 10.  For those of you who picked more than 5 or
6 I have reduced that number, based on my thoughts about which of your chosen
reviewers have had the most direct contact with you and are most likely to
give a thorough review.  Let me know if you think I really blew it.  For
secretaries, the online stuff is optional.  If you don't use it, I will
solicit input from the people you work with like I have in the past and
consolidate it with my own comments on one form.   Thanks.  DF


I will assume that you can retrieve e-mail by now.  Below is a recent
development, as you have asked to be kept apprised.  It is the draft, still
subject to comment, on how to allocate transmission import capacity into
Italy for 2001.  Important, as it is our main (nearly only) source of
physical power to satisfy deals we have originated.  What appears below is
Alfredo's summary.  Recognise that English is not his first language
(probably his fourth), so it is a bit difficult to follow first time
through.   mcs
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT on 15/08/2000
18:07 ---------------------------

Alfredo Huertas
15/08/2000 16:58
To: Riccardo Bortolotti/LON/ECT@ECT, Marco Lantieri/LON/ECT@ECT, Paul
Mead/LON/ECT@ECT, Marco De Angeli/LON/ECT@ECT, Peter Heydecker/LON/ECT@ECT,
Paul Mead/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT@ECT, Joe Gold/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: New import capacity rules in Italy

The new delibera by the Authority outlines the methodology for the allocation
of import capacity in 2001. Full details should be necessarily developed in
full by the TSO by 30 Sept 2000. Find below, an apetizer for tomorrow's
conference call.

Main features

1. The Delibera asks the TSO to reach a compromise with neighbouring TSOs in
order to render the allocation "firm" and "deep", that is, to ensure that
agents who obtain import capacity into Italy receive a transparent and
non-discriminatory treatment by these foreign TSOs. In case of disagreement,
the  Italian TSO will proceed autonomously with its own allocation (which is
the current status).

3. Allocation procedure: iterative auction. Clearing price "seems" to be
Pay-As-You-Bid, but the drafting is not conclusive.

4. No Letter of Credit or Declaration of Neighbouring TSOs, or Supply
Contract with end-customer required to agents participating in the auction.
This has  been replaced by  a Letter of Intention per consumption point
(which expresses interest for the capacity requested).

5. 80 (20) percent of ATC for 2001 to be allocated annually (monthly). Bids
before 30 Sept 2000 (90 days before the start of each month). Bidding block
is 10  MW, at non-decreasing prices.

6. Antitrust thresholds: 20 percent of ATC per border and per agent, 10
percent of total ATC per agent. The thresholds are applicable both to the
amount  requested, and/or the amount allocated.

Main concerns

1. Any substantial progress with respect to the 2000 situation depends on the
ability of the Italian TSOs to fulfill its mandate of reaching a
co-ordinated   allocation with neighbouring TSOs. The Delibera does not
provide any idea on how the Italian TSO may exercise its leverage to find a
successful solution  (eg, making co-ordination more profitable for foreign
TSOs? Curtailing the level of import capacity in case of disagreement such
that foreign TSOs wheel  less volumes/possibly make less money? Is money the
issue or perhaps, leaving us outside the game?)

2. The alternative in case of disagreement (that is, unilateral allocation of
50 percent of the ATC) makes no sense. If there is not an agreement (as it
happened in 2000), allocating only 50 percent unilaterally does not solve
anything. Actually, it could make things worse by removing some pressure by
agents who got allocated 100 percent of the capacity on the Italian side,
over foreign TSOs (as happened this year). As drafted, the Delibera makes
the  Italian TSO to accept whatever allocation the foreign TSOs decide for
their 50 percent, without requesting a reciprocal treatment for the 50
percent capacity  allocated by the Italian TSO!!! This could have been an
interesting "carrot" for the Swiss if properly articulated.

3. The details of the auction procedure contain several loopholes and
inconsistencies. Some clarification will be needed by the Autorita, and we
will need to  send asap a list of all unclear definitions.

4. Only one letter of intention as in 4 above per consumption point. This
means the consumer gets tied up with a single supplier before the allocation
takes  place.

5. Spot purchases by TSO still opaque. In some circumstances, this is being
favourable to us, so let's consider if we want to say anything here.

6. Lack of any reference to secondary trading of capacity. Not prohibited,
but not proposed or explicitly outlined.

7. The "Pay-as-you-Bid" criteria makes less attractive Paul/Marco's proposed
deal structure with ELES for sales into Italy.

More tomorrow,

a.


This meeting is in regard to rebooking and cleaning up some BTU swaps with Cross Timbers aka XTO - no positions will be affected.

We will be meeting at my desk.

Thanks.

Sheetal
x36740


Clement,
 Please review the attached Guaranty as I have modified same.   If acceptable
in your view, please proceed with execution.  Thank you for your patience.


Can you co-ordinate weather, reg and structuring.  I have some concerns we have missed out some weather models etc.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kitchen, Louise
Sent:	Friday, December 28, 2001 1:24 PM
To:	Rub, Jenny; Webb, Jay; Oxley, David; Myers, Thomas; Colwell, Wes; Hodges, Georgeanne; Taylor, Mark E (Legal); Brackett, Debbie R.; Buy, Rick; Port, David; Beck, Sally; Reeves, Leslie; Hall, Bob M
Cc:	Lavorato, John
Subject:	FW: Re-start/Integration Planning

Although yesterday's meeting was excellent, we do need to get a lot more detailed on the Re-start plans.  I would like everyone to have completed their re-start plans by the end of next week for mid/back office.  I realize you have all done a tremendous amount of work so far and this is what we really need to get in documentation form particularly as we may have a partner/buyer who we have not had as many detailed meetings with.

As you can see from the email below we are asking the commercial groups to do the same thing.

Let me know if there are any issues - we are planning for a Jan 20 restart.

Thanks

Louise

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kitchen, Louise
Sent:	Thursday, December 27, 2001 4:58 PM
To:	Belden, Tim; Calger, Christopher F.; Presto, Kevin M.; Duran, W. David; Robinson, Mitch; Forster, David; Curry, Mike; Arnold, John; Shively, Hunter S.; Milnthorp, Rob; Zufferli, John; Luce, Laura; Vickers, Frank; Neal, Scott; Lagrasta, Fred; Aucoin, Berney C. ; Steffes, James D.; Roberts, Mike A.; Grigsby, Mike; Tycholiz, Barry; Allen, Phillip K.; Redmond, Brian; Martin, Thomas A.
Cc:	Lavorato, John
Subject:	Re-start/Integration Planning

We have for the last couple of weeks started to compile the Re-start/Integration Plans for Netco.  So far, we have primarily focussed on the mid/back plans where the technology requirements have been the driving factors.  Several plans are  in progress:-

+	Infrastructure		Jenny Rub
+	Development		Jay Webb
+	EnronOnline		Webb / Forster
+	HR			David Oxley
+	Cash Management	Tom Myers
+	Credit			Debbie Brackett

The rest will be completed shortly.

We now need to focus on the commercial plans which have a slightly different focus. John and I would like to receive the plans "Re-start/Integration"  plans by January 7th, 2002 in order to go through them individually with each of you or in groups.  The focus should be to ensure that we have as much of the business up and running in the shortest time possible.  I have a suggested outline which you do not have to use but I thought it might help.  Please decide within yourselves the areas you will cover together or individually.

Customer Side
+	Customers		Phase  1 - First Week (eg top 10)
				Phase  2 - First Month (eg top 50)
				Phase  3 - First Quarter (eg top 100)
+	Action Plan		Phase  1 Customers
				Phase  2 Customers
				Phase  3 Customers
+	Contracts by customers (pre-prepared with credit terms etc)
+	Customer visit schedule

Product Side
+	List of Products	Phase 1 - First Week
				Phase 2 - First Month
				Phase 3 - First Quarter

Target Number of Transactions
+	Phase 1
+	Phase 2
+	Phase 3

IT transfer

Louise


---------------------- Forwarded by Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT on 04/19/2000
02:02 PM ---------------------------

"SOCORRO HERNANDEZ" <SUHERNAN@LLGM.COM> on 04/07/2000 09:26:35 AM
To: <Judy.Hernandez@enron.com>, <IRENEpepe@hotmail.com>,
<silviamanzanales@hotmail.com>, "A. SUE GONZALES-GUEVARA"
<AGUEVARA@LLGM.COM>, "JESSICA VEGA" <JVEGA@LLGM.COM>, "KATHY MARIE MOORE"
<KMOORE@LLGM.COM>, "MARIA SOLIZ" <MSOLIZ@LLGM.COM>, "VALERIE WALLACE"
<VWALLACE@LLGM.COM>
cc:
Subject: THE BEST THINGS IN LIFE

* THE BEST THINGS IN LIFE *
 >> > >
Falling in love.
Laughing so hard your face hurts.
Hot shower.
No lines at the Super Walmart.
A special glance.
Getting mail.
Taking a drive on a scenic road.
Hearing your favorite song on the radio.
Lying in bed listening to the rain outside.
Hot towels out of the dryer.
Finding the sweater you want is on sale for half price.
Chocolate milkshake.
A long distance phone call.
A bubble bath.
Giggling.
A good conversation.
The beach.
Finding a $20 bill in your coat from last winter.
Laughing at yourself.
Midnight phone calls that last for hours.
Running through sprinklers.
Laughing for absolutely no reason at all.
Having someone tell you that you're beautiful.
Laughing at an inside joke.
Friends.
Falling in love for the first time.
Accidentally overhearing someone say something nice about you.
Waking up and realizing you still have a few hours left to sleep.
Your first kiss.
Making new friends or spending time with old ones.
Playing with a puppy.
Late night talks with your roommate
Having someone play with your hair.
Sweet dreams.
Hot chocolate.
Road trips with friends.
Swinging on swings.
Watching a good movie cuddled up on a couch with someone you love.
Wrapping presents under the Christmas tree while eating cookies and drinking
eggnog.
Song lyrics printed inside your new CD so you can sing along without feeling
stupid.
Going to a really good concert.
Making eye contact with a cute stranger.
Making chocolate chip cookies!
Hugging the person you love.
Watching the expression someone's face as they open a much-desired present
from you.
Watching the sunrise.
Getting out of bed every morning and thanking God for another beautiful day.
 >> > >
PASS ON THESE NATURAL HIGHS TO AT LEAST 7 PEOPLE IN THE NEXT HALF HOUR AND
GOOD-LUCK WILL COME TO YOU IN THE NEXT FEW HOURS!!

Many people will walk in and out of your life, but only true riends
will leave a footprint in your heart.

 >=====
 >"Deep inside the heart of every man there lies a deep, yawning chasm which
can only be filled by the one true God."


Beginning this week, we are actively testing the changes to Path Manager to
receive real-time deal updates from Sitara.  To prepare for this, we would
like to have a limited group of schedulers from each desk go thru a quick
walkthru/training of the new features sometime early next week.  This should
only take about 30 minutes.  Once they are comfortable with the features and
performance, and once the testing is complete, we would like to migrate this
to Unify Production either next week or the week after.  This should give us
an adequate adjustment period prior to the next bid week.

Once it is migrated to Production, we can either roll it out to all
schedulers or to selected schedulers via security.

Heather, could you please schedule some time with the designated schedulers,
Scotty, and myself early next week.  A room with a projector would work best.

Thanks, d.n.


Please expect a phone call from Andrew Makk, currently in the Mid East group,
who is interested in exploring opportunities in each of your areas.  He is a
very qualified individual who would be a tremendous resource in any of your
groups.  Thanks.  Jeff