---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron on 06/08/2001
10:05 PM ---------------------------

Peter Styles@ECT
06/01/2001 04:58 AM
To: Brendan Devlin/EU/Enron@Enron
cc: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: EFET draft security of supply paper

Take a look at attachment below for guidance in any discussion with Ristori
next Wednesday re Bush energy policy statement and comparative aspects of EC
green paper on sec. of supply. To remind you of what Loyola said on CNN
yesterday:
 - Agrees with need to re-evaluate role of nuclear plus future investment in
it .
 - Disagrees with weight given to supply side and indigenous sources,
compared with demand side and fuel diversity (also from external sources?)
 - Disagrees with exclusion of climate change considerations.

---------------------- Forwarded by Peter Styles/LON/ECT on 06/01/2001 10:25
AM ---------------------------

brian.samuel@txu-europe.com@txu-europe.com on 04/23/2001 02:31:45 PM
To: "EFET Secretariat" <secretariat@efet.org>
cc: peter.styles@enron.com

Subject: EWG - security of supply paper

Jan, please find a revised draft of the SoS paper following discussions with
Peter. I would be grateful if you could circulate it to the members of the
electricity working group for comment by 30th April. Likewise could you also
forward it to Ian Wood.
(See attached file: efetsos.doc)

Thanks Brian

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~    DISCLAIMER    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

This E-mail is private and confidential and may be covered by
legal professional privilege. It is therefore only intended for
the addressee(s). If you are not one of those persons you must
not read, copy, store, disclose, use or distribute its contents.
Please also contact the sender immediately and delete the original.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 - efetsos.doc

---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron on 06/08/2001
10:05 PM ---------------------------
From: Bruno Gaillard/Enron@EUEnronXGate on 06/01/2001 07:07 PM GDT
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject:  Background Information France Electricity

Background

The Continental European electricity market is developing from an integrated
monopoly business to a competitive market. A segment of electricity users now
have the right to choose their supplier from a range of marketers. The
emergence of new marketers and generators has created the demand for price
risk management solutions and has encouraged the development of a traded
wholesale market. Following the adoption of the EU Electricity Directive in
December 1996, member states were obliged to transpose the directive into
national legislation opening electricity markets to competition by February
1999.

The directive sets out a three-tiered approach to the liberalisation of
electricity supply markets. Stage one entered into effect on 19 February
1997, and calls for the opening of 22% of national markets, based on the
average community share of electricity consumed by end customers using more
than 40 GWh per year. The degree of opening will increase over six years by
lowering the community consumption threshold to 20 GWh in 2000 (27% market
opening) and to 9 GWh in 2003 (32-33% market opening). Distributor access is
a matter for each member state. The implementation of a new directive,
expected in 2002, will improve the conditions for a liberalized market.

At present, the level of compliance with the directive varies between member
states. The EU countries farthest along the process of liberalisation are
Germany, Austria, Spain and the Netherlands. Switzerland, although it is not
an EU member state, is integral to market developments. France, although
having chosen to comply with the minimum requirements of the directive, has
proven to open up their market more than expected.

Current Market

EDF is the dominant electricity producer in France, the largest power
producer in the world with 475TWh generated in 2000,  and the largest
exporter in Europe (net exports reached 71 TWh in 2000).  Power generation in
France is mainly nuclear (70%), but also hydro (20%), while conventional
thermal generation represents 10%. EDF is a vertically integrated company
with services and products in generation (92%), supply (?%), transmission and
distribution (95%). Finally, this historical supplier is a State Entity; the
French State owns EDF,s capital.  A few Independent Power Producers (IPP) are
also active in the market, such as Snet (6.4TWh, coal-fired), and CNR (16TWh,
hydro). Other smaller IPPs are commercially active but most must sell their
production to EDF under a regulated tariff.

More than 100 distribution companies are active through a concession regime
in their local distribution area. Few, however, are of a significant size
(less than a dozen have sales of over 400 GWhs), or have eligible customers
in their concession areas.

The French System Operator (RTE) was created on 1 July 2000 and is a
sub-division of EDF, although it is unbundled in terms of management and
accounting. A postage stamp tariff has been implemented under the
transitional regime, which varies according to the voltage used and is based
on a matrix (Summer/Winter, Peak/Off-Peak). Users have to contract for their
maximum transmission capacity. Imbalances are settled under a published
tariff, which introduces high charges for imbalances beyond a 10% tolerance
level and 5MW.

A three-year framework contract (e.g., by way of a Master Agreement with a
minimum term of three years) is required for eligible customers, but
eligibles are free to deal for shorter maturity transactions within such a
three-year contractual framework.

Although the criteria for eligibility is per site, and eligible customers
have to contract transmission for each site, RTE has created balancing
responsibility contracts (contrats de Responsable d'Equilibre) which compels
the aggregation of imbalance charges for different eligible sites within an
equilibrium perimeter defined with RTE. Imbalances are settled under a
published tariff which charges a heavy penalty for any imbalance beyond a 10%
tolerance level or 5MW.

Even though we are currently under a transitional regime in France, the
ability to trade power already exists. Optimisation can be found through
real-time arbitrage offered by the flexibility of the industrial process, the
availability of market prices and optional structures. The establishment of
balancing responsibility contracts has created the basic conditions for an
effective power trading market in France, and this through the exchange of
blocks from one perimeter to another. Blocs are only exchangeable on
day-ahead bases but intra-day procedures are expected to be implemented. All
transactions are currently based on bilateral physical contracts.

The establishment of this framework has contributed to an increasing number
of players for trading, imports, exports and transit; we are confident that
the French power market will develop rapidly.     Enron Capital & Trade
Resources Limited ("ECTRL") is a balancing responsible actor in France and
closed the first physical power transaction in France early 2000, and was the
very first new entrant to trade power (buy/sell) in France late 2000.

Future Developments

France's size and geographical position will make it a natural hub for
trading on the Continent. It is Europe's second largest electricity market,
with net consumption (including industrial on-site consumption) totalling
over 400 TWh in 1999. The increase of physical trading, envisaged capacity
release by EDF, and creation of future market mechanism will contribute to
the further development of the market.

Both a balancing market and a spot exchange market are expected to be
implemented by end 2001. Players in the balancing market will propose put and
call options, exercised by RTE according to its own portfolio of contacts
(producer, consumer) and providing it with physical balancing capacity. The
balancing market will also show referenced market prices for balancing
services.

Some of the spot market volume is expected to be operated by ParisBourse.
However, due to the dominant position of EDF, the limited number of active
IPPs, existing restrictions for trading for authorised producers in France,
and the lack of transparency with regard to current rules for allocation of
cross-border capacity and attribution of congestion costs, we believe that
the conditions for the creation of an effective spot power market in France
are not yet fully met.

Recently, the European Commission has asked EDF to auction 6,000MW of virtual
capacity through VPP auctions starting in September 2001, representing about
30% of the market for French eligible industrials This will further
contribute to increase liquidity.

Regulatory Environment

The goal of Directive 96/92/EC concerning the internal market in electricity
is to obtain a cheaper but secure electricity supply by introducing and
gradually expanding competition while maintaining industry competitiveness in
the face of price decreases. France has transposed the directive, however
certain imperfection with regards to non-discriminatory access and the level
of liberalisation still exist.

The French Electricity law was passed on 10 February 2000, a year later  than
required by the EU, establishing a transitional regime for third party access
(TPA). Several application decrees still have to be passed, including
transportation tariffs on the electric grid to eligible customers. The
current threshold for eligibility is 16GWh (net of auto-consumption) per year
and per site, and represents about 600 eligible clients and 1,200 sites.
Eligibility for distribution companies is currently limited to the eligible
consumption of customers located in their concession areas. The French power
market is effectively open to some competition, and about 60 eligible
industrials have so far switched totally or partly from the historical
supplier. The eligibility threshold will be reduced to 9GWh per site by
direct application of the EU Directive by Feb. 2003, as the French government
declined a quicker opening of the power market.

The two main authorities, which oversee the industry, are the CRE (Commission
de Regulation de l'Electricit,) is the official regulatory body and the
ministry of industry. The CRE is responsible to insure that RTE provides for
non-discriminatory access on to the grid and will be issuing transportation
tariffs.  The Ministry is responsible for providing generation licenses for
IPPs and for determining eligibility issues.

RTE is implementing new capacity allocation procedures on the UK, Italy and
Spain interconnectors. On the remaining borders, capacity is currently
allocated on a first-come-first served basis rule, and congestion fees are
levied at the margin, which favours long-term contracts and historical
players. In addition, there is currently some lack of transparency with
regards to RTE real-time data on the capacity available/used for exports and
imports. However an intra-day market is now effective for transits, imports
and exports.  The first come first serve allocation rule on border capacity
is likely to be changed by end 2001. In addition, the CRE is likely to
request RTE to release additional data in the months to come.

New IPPs have to be authorised through auctions or through direct decision of
the Ministry of Industry, the main route for authorisation. Authorised IPPs
in France are limited by Decree to buying for resale to eligible customers a
maximum of buy for resale to eligible customers a volume equivalent to 20% of
the installed capacity, including long term contracts. Although the
interpretation of this law is unclear, a recent statement by M. Tuot,
Director General of the CRE, implies that these restrictions only apply to
French authorised producers and thus not to foreign-based energy companies or
other non-producing entities. Thus, these restrictions do not apply to ECTRL,
as we are not registered in France.  In addition, French IPPs are free to
sell and export their production.

Eligible customers, who are physically connected to the Grid, have to
contract for transmission vis-.-vis RTE (Contrat Made). Traders, such as
ECTRL, are not required to have such a transmission contract, as they do not
consume the power they purchase. Only a balancing responsibility contract
coupled with grid access contracts (import, export, and/or transit) are
required by RTE.

A new Decree is expected to be passed by Summer 2001, setting up new
conditions for transmission, transits and exports under a permanent regime.
Imports, which are allocated on a pro-rata basis, are free of transmission
charges.

A network code is currently under discussion between market players and
RTE.

Market Conventions

A range of wholesale electricity products are currently traded in France.
Peak and baseload day-ahead, week-ahead, monthly, quaterly, and yearly
products are traded.  Peak products follow the German convention (12 hour
peaks on weekdays, 08h00-20h00).  Contract sizes are typically 25MW or 50MW.

Gate closure for scheduling imports, exports and transits is 14h00 Paris
time.  Gate closure for scheduling "echanges de blocs" is 16h00 Paris time.

Other: The Gas Market

A transitional regime was implemented on 10 August 2000 by direct application
of the EU Directive, thus establishing regulated TPA for sites whose
consumption is over 25 million cubic meters p.a. The eligibility threshold
will be reduced to 15million cubic meters in 2003, and 5 million cubic meters
in 2008. No gas law has been passed yet (forecasted for mid 2002), and it is
expected that the transitional regime for gas in France will last until end
2002. A zonal/distance-related tariff was published on 13 July 2000 by
GdF-Transportation. A permanent entry/exit tariff structure is likely to be
developed for 2003. Charges for imbalances are expensive and access to
storage is restricted. GdF-Trading, however, has published conditions for
balancing services.
There is only one trading Hub for France located at the French/Belgian border
(Blaregnies/TaisniSres). Due to the distance-related nature of the
transportation tariff, competitive TPA is limited to eligible sites which are
located not too far (less than about 250Km) from the French/Belgian border.
The main imports into France are for high cal gas, and GdF has published the
conditions for high cal/low cal gas swaps.
As there is not yet a gas law in France (a +Projet de Loi, was approved on
17th May 2000) transposing the EU gas directive into domestic legislation,
the Regulatory Commission has not been appointed to date, and the official
regulatory body remains the Ministry of Industry.
Although current conditions do not facilitate full requirement supply to
customers from new entrants, it is already possible to optimise gas supply
through import of blocs for part or full supply. ECTRL was the first new
entrant to supply gas at the French border, and more recently into France.
ECTRL's cumulative volume of gas trades so far totals 550 million cubic
meters.

The above represents only Enron's and its affiliates views' and, accordingly,
neither Enron nor any of its affiliates is providing any advice to you in the
above information.  You are not entitled to rely on any of the above
information and you are advised to take such other independent advice, as you
may deem necessary in respect of the matters referred to above.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Brod, Simon
Sent: 25 May 2001 17:31
To: Gaillard, Bruno
Cc: de Gaulle, Pierre; Brun, Raphael; Davies, Philip; Duvauchelle, Antoine;
Sankey, Ross
Subject: RE: Background Information France/Final Draft

My suggested paragraph on market conventions:

A range of wholesale electricity products are currently traded in France.
Peak and baseload day-ahead, week-ahead, monthly, quaterly, and yearly
products are traded.  Peak products follow the German convention (12 hour
peaks on weekdays, 08h00-20h00).  Contract sizes are typically 25MW or 50MW.

Gate closure for scheduling imports, exports and transits is 14h00 Paris
time.  Gate closure for scheduling "echanges de blocs" is 16h00 Paris time.

Simon

From: Bruno Gaillard/Enron@EUEnronXGate on 25/05/2001 15:36
To: Pierre de Gaulle/LON/ECT@ECT, Raphael Brun/LON/ECT@ECT, Simon
Brod/LON/ECT@ECT, Philip Davies/Enron@EUEnronXGate, Antoine
Duvauchelle/Enron@EUEnronXGate
cc: Ross Sankey/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: RE: Background Information France/Final Draft

Below please find a revised version of the document. One element that is
still missing and that should be completed by the traders is the
"conventions" by possibly adding gate closure information, peak vs. off-peak,
and other relevant information.

Bruno

Updated May 2001.

Background

The Continental European electricity market is developing from an integrated
monopoly business to a competitive market. A segment of electricity users now
have the right to choose their supplier from a range of marketers. The
emergence of new marketers and generators has created the demand for price
risk management solutions and has encouraged the development of a traded
wholesale market. Following the adoption of the EU Electricity Directive in
December 1996, member states were obliged to transpose the directive into
national legislation opening electricity markets to competition by February
1999.

The directive sets out a three-tiered approach to the liberalisation of
electricity supply markets. Stage one entered into effect on 19 February
1997, and calls for the opening of 22% of national markets, based on the
average community share of electricity consumed by end customers using more
than 40 GWh per year. The degree of opening will increase over six years by
lowering the community consumption threshold to 20 GWh in 2000 (27% market
opening) and to 9 GWh in 2003 (32-33% market opening). Distributor access is
a matter for each member state. The implementation of a new directive,
expected in 2002, will improve the conditions for a liberalized market.

At present, the level of compliance with the directive varies between member
states. The EU countries farthest along the process of liberalisation are
Germany, Austria, Spain and the Netherlands. Switzerland, although it is not
an EU member state, is integral to market developments. France, although
having chosen to comply with the minimum requirements of the directive, has
proven to open up their market more than expected.

Current Market

EDF is the dominant electricity producer in France, the largest power
producer in the world with 475TWh generated in 2000,  and the largest
exporter in Europe (net exports reached 71 TWh in 2000).  Power generation in
France is mainly nuclear (70%), but also hydro (20%), while conventional
thermal generation represents 10%. EDF is a vertically integrated company
with services and products in generation (92%), supply (?%), transmission and
distribution (95%). Finally, this historical supplier is a State Entity; the
French State owns EDF,s capital.  A few Independent Power Producers (IPP) are
also active in the market, such as Snet (6.4TWh, coal-fired), and CNR (16TWh,
hydro). Other smaller IPPs are commercially active but most must sell their
production to EDF under a regulated tariff.

More than 100 distribution companies are active through a concession regime
in their local distribution area. Few, however, are of a significant size
(less than a dozen have sales of over 400 GWhs), or have eligible customers
in their concession areas.

The French System Operator (RTE) was created on 1 July 2000 and is a
sub-division of EDF, although it is unbundled in terms of management and
accounting. A postage stamp tariff has been implemented under the
transitional regime, which varies according to the voltage used and is based
on a matrix (Summer/Winter, Peak/Off-Peak). Users have to contract for their
maximum transmission capacity. Imbalances are settled under a published
tariff, which introduces high charges for imbalances beyond a 10% tolerance
level and 5MW.

A three-year framework contract (e.g., by way of a Master Agreement with a
minimum term of three years) is required for eligible customers, but
eligibles are free to deal for shorter maturity transactions within such a
three-year contractual framework.

Although the criteria for eligibility is per site, and eligible customers
have to contract transmission for each site, RTE has created balancing
responsibility contracts (contrats de Responsable d'Equilibre) which compels
the aggregation of imbalance charges for different eligible sites within an
equilibrium perimeter defined with RTE. Imbalances are settled under a
published tariff which charges a heavy penalty for any imbalance beyond a 10%
tolerance level or 5MW.

Even though we are currently under a transitional regime in France, the
ability to trade power already exists. Optimisation can be found through
real-time arbitrage offered by the flexibility of the industrial process, the
availability of market prices and optional structures. The establishment of
balancing responsibility contracts has created the basic conditions for an
effective power trading market in France, and this through the exchange of
blocks from one perimeter to another. Blocs are only exchangeable on
day-ahead bases but intra-day procedures are expected to be implemented. All
transactions are currently based on bilateral physical contracts.

The establishment of this framework has contributed to an increasing number
of players for trading, imports, exports and transit; we are confident that
the French power market will develop rapidly.     Enron Capital & Trade
Resources Limited ("ECTRL") is a balancing responsible actor in France and
closed the first physical power transaction in France early 2000, and was the
very first new entrant to trade power (buy/sell) in France late 2000.

Future Developments
 << OLE Object: Picture (Metafile) >>
France's size and geographical position will make it a natural hub for
trading on the Continent. It is Europe's second largest electricity market,
with net consumption (including industrial on-site consumption) totalling
over 400 TWh in 1999. The increase of physical trading, envisaged capacity
release by EDF, and creation of future market mechanism will contribute to
the further development of the market.

Both a balancing market and a spot exchange market are expected to be
implemented by end 2001. Players in the balancing market will propose put and
call options, exercised by RTE according to its own portfolio of contacts
(producer, consumer) and providing it with physical balancing capacity. The
balancing market will also show referenced market prices for balancing
services.

Some of the spot market volume is expected to be operated by ParisBourse.
However, due to the dominant position of EDF, the limited number of active
IPPs, existing restrictions for trading for authorised producers in France,
and the lack of transparency with regard to current rules for allocation of
cross-border capacity and attribution of congestion costs, we believe that
the conditions for the creation of an effective spot power market in France
are not yet fully met.

Recently, the European Commission has asked EDF to auction 6,000MW of virtual
capacity through VPP auctions starting in September 2001, representing about
30% of the market for French eligible industrials This will further
contribute to increase liquidity.

Regulatory Environment
 << OLE Object: Picture (Metafile) >>
The goal of Directive 96/92/EC concerning the internal market in electricity
is to obtain a cheaper but secure electricity supply by introducing and
gradually expanding competition while maintaining industry competitiveness in
the face of price decreases. France has transposed the directive, however
certain imperfection with regards to non-discriminatory access and the level
of liberalisation still exist.

The French Electricity law was passed on 10 February 2000, a year later  than
required by the EU, establishing a transitional regime for third party access
(TPA). Several application decrees still have to be passed, including
transportation tariffs on the electric grid to eligible customers. The
current threshold for eligibility is 16GWh (net of auto-consumption) per year
and per site, and represents about 600 eligible clients and 1,200 sites.
Eligibility for distribution companies is currently limited to the eligible
consumption of customers located in their concession areas. The French power
market is effectively open to some competition, and about 60 eligible
industrials have so far switched totally or partly from the historical
supplier. The eligibility threshold will be reduced to 9GWh per site by
direct application of the EU Directive by Feb. 2003, as the French government
declined a quicker opening of the power market.

The two main authorities, which oversee the industry, are the CRE (Commission
de Regulation de l'Electricit,) is the official regulatory body and the
ministry of industry. The CRE is responsible to insure that RTE provides for
non-discriminatory access on to the grid and will be issuing transportation
tariffs.  The Ministry is responsible for providing generation licenses for
IPPs and for determining eligibility issues.

RTE is implementing new capacity allocation procedures on the UK, Italy and
Spain interconnectors. On the remaining borders, capacity is currently
allocated on a first-come-first served basis rule, and congestion fees are
levied at the margin, which favours long-term contracts and historical
players. In addition, there is currently some lack of transparency with
regards to RTE real-time data on the capacity available/used for exports and
imports. However an intra-day market is now effective for transits, imports
and exports.  The first come first serve allocation rule on border capacity
is likely to be changed by end 2001. In addition, the CRE is likely to
request RTE to release additional data in the months to come.

New IPPs have to be authorised through auctions or through direct decision of
the Ministry of Industry, the main route for authorisation. Authorised IPPs
in France are limited by Decree to buying for resale to eligible customers a
maximum of buy for resale to eligible customers a volume equivalent to 20% of
the installed capacity, including long term contracts. Although the
interpretation of this law is unclear, a recent statement by M. Tuot,
Director General of the CRE, implies that these restrictions only apply to
French authorised producers and thus not to foreign-based energy companies or
other non-producing entities. Thus, these restrictions do not apply to ECTRL,
as we are not registered in France.  In addition, French IPPs are free to
sell and export their production.

Eligible customers, who are physically connected to the Grid, have to
contract for transmission vis-.-vis RTE (Contrat Made). Traders, such as
ECTRL, are not required to have such a transmission contract, as they do not
consume the power they purchase. Only a balancing responsibility contract
coupled with grid access contracts (import, export, and/or transit) are
required by RTE.

A new Decree is expected to be passed by Summer 2001, setting up new
conditions for transmission, transits and exports under a permanent regime.
Imports, which are allocated on a pro-rata basis, are free of transmission
charges.

A network code is currently under discussion between market players and
RTE.

Market Conventions

Traders: Need to Add: gate closer information and on-peak off peak hours plus
whatever relevant conventions.

Other: The Gas Market

A transitional regime was implemented on 10 August 2000 by direct application
of the EU Directive, thus establishing regulated TPA for sites whose
consumption is over 25 million cubic meters p.a. The eligibility threshold
will be reduced to 15million cubic meters in 2003, and 5 million cubic meters
in 2008. No gas law has been passed yet (forecasted for mid 2002), and it is
expected that the transitional regime for gas in France will last until end
2002. A zonal/distance-related tariff was published on 13 July 2000 by
GdF-Transportation. A permanent entry/exit tariff structure is likely to be
developed for 2003. Charges for imbalances are expensive and access to
storage is restricted. GdF-Trading, however, has published conditions for
balancing services.
There is only one trading Hub for France located at the French/Belgian border
(Blaregnies/TaisniSres). Due to the distance-related nature of the
transportation tariff, competitive TPA is limited to eligible sites which are
located not too far (less than about 250Km) from the French/Belgian border.
The main imports into France are for high cal gas, and GdF has published the
conditions for high cal/low cal gas swaps.
As there is not yet a gas law in France (a +Projet de Loi, was approved on
17th May 2000) transposing the EU gas directive into domestic legislation,
the Regulatory Commission has not been appointed to date, and the official
regulatory body remains the Ministry of Industry.
Although current conditions do not facilitate full requirement supply to
customers from new entrants, it is already possible to optimise gas supply
through import of blocs for part or full supply. ECTRL was the first new
entrant to supply gas at the French border, and more recently into France.
ECTRL's cumulative volume of gas trades so far totals 550 million cubic
meters.

The above represents only Enron's and its affiliates views' and, accordingly,
neither Enron nor any of its affiliates is providing any advice to you in the
above information.  You are not entitled to rely on any of the above
information and you are advised to take such other independent advice, as you
may deem necessary in respect of the matters referred to above.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  de Gaulle, Pierre
Sent: 25 May 2001 12:22
To: Brun, Raphael; Brod, Simon; Gaillard, Bruno; Davies, Philip
Cc: Sankey, Ross
Subject: RE: Background Information France/Final Draft

This is the final draft as approved by EOL legal and Mark Elliott.

Any ultimate comments?

Pierre
---------------------- Forwarded by Pierre De Gaulle/LON/ECT on 25/05/2001
12:24 ---------------------------
From: Justin Boyd/Enron@EUEnronXGate on 25/05/2001 12:16
To: Mark Elliott/Enron@EUEnronXGate, Pierre de Gaulle/LON/ECT@ECT, Ian
Brungs/Enron@EUEnronXGate
cc:

Subject: RE: Background Information France/Final Draft

i have no further comments from an EOL perspective

justin
 -----Original Message-----
From:  Elliott, Mark
Sent: 25 May 2001 12:05
To: de Gaulle, Pierre; Boyd, Justin; Brungs, Ian
Subject: FW: Background Information France/Final Draft

Pierre,

Re the main text - see my comments in blue below.  I have passed this on to
Justin as you will see as Justin is charge of Legal for EOL and will also
have to approve it.  With regards to the slides, could you give me a hard
copy - I can't seem to open them on my system.

Kind regards

Mark

 -----Original Message-----
From:  de Gaulle, Pierre
Sent: 22 May 2001 12:26
To: Mark Elliott/LON/ECT@ENRON; Oliver, Jennifer
Subject: RE: Background Information France/Final Draft

Mark,

Please find herewith the background info for EOL France. It seems that you
would have to approve it (Any other approval needed?). Please note that this
draft has been seen and amended by Raphael, Simon, Philip and Bruno.

Thanks

Pierre

---------------------- Forwarded by Pierre De Gaulle/LON/ECT on 22/05/2001
12:22 ---------------------------
From: Jennifer Oliver/Enron@EUEnronXGate on 22/05/2001 11:10
To: Pierre de Gaulle/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: RE: Background Information France/Final Draft

Pierre,

Has French Power Legal approved the final draft below? If not, please could
they review before I submit this to the EnronOnline approval process. Also,
please let me know any other approvals you have receieved so far. This will
help determine who still needs to review.

Thanks,
Jennifer

 -----Original Message-----
From:  de Gaulle, Pierre
Sent: 21 May 2001 18:04
To: Oliver, Jennifer; Goddard, Paul
Subject: Re: Background Information France/Final Draft

Please find the final draft of EOL Backgoung information for France. Please
also find two slides about France, which can be included in the Continental
Gas Trading presentation.

I would like to appear in the background as the main commercial contact
point, as follows:

Pierre de Gaulle
Director France
Tel: + 44 207 783 7742
Fax: + 44 207 783 8255
Mobile: + 44 777 19 01 565
Email: Pierre.de.Gaulle@enron.com

 Thanks

Pierre

 << File: SlidesFrance.ppt >>

---------------------- Forwarded by Pierre De Gaulle/LON/ECT on 21/05/2001
18:00 ---------------------------

 << OLE Object: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) >>
Bruno Gaillard@ENRON
21/05/2001 17:51
To: Pierre de Gaulle/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Raphael Brun/LON/ECT@ECT, Simon Brod/LON/ECT@ECT, Philip
Davies/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Background Information France/EOL/Draft 2   << OLE Object:
StdOleLink >>

See red and strikethrough comments below

---------------------- Forwarded by Pierre De Gaulle/LON/ECT on 20/05/2001
16:09 ---------------------------

 << OLE Object: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) >>
Pierre de Gaulle
14/05/2001 19:56
Sent by: Pierre De Gaulle
To: Jennifer Oliver/EU/Enron@Enron, Paul Goddard/EU/Enron@Enron
cc: Philip Davies/LON/ECT@ECT, Bruno Gaillard/EU/Enron@Enron, Raphael
Brun/LON/ECT@ECT, Simon Brod/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Background Information France

Please find a draft of the marketing background information about the French
power (and gas) markets for EOL.

Your comments are appreciated.

Thanks

Pierre

Updated May 2001.

1)Background

France is the second largest country in Europe with 58 million inhabitants.
EdF, who was the monopolistic producer, is the largest power producer in the
world with 475TWh generated in 2000, thanks to nuclear production. The
historical supplier, who is at the same time the largest exporter of power in
Europe (net exports reached 71TWh in 2000), is a direct emanation from the
French State, who owns EdF capital. Power generation in France is mainly
nuclear (70%), but also hydro (20%), while conventional thermal generation
represents 10%. EdF owns 92% of power generation, and 95% of distribution.

A few Independent Power Producers (IPP) are also active in the market, such
as Snet (6.4TWh, coal-fired), and CNR (16TWh, hydro). Other small IPPs sell
their production to EdF under a regulated tariff. There has been significant
development of cogeneration projects since 1997. There is now 3,500MW of
installed capacity, thanks to the legal obligation for EdF to purchase power
generated from cogeneration units at a preferable (is "preferable" the
correct word??)   tariff. In the view of the transposition of  the EU
Electricity Directive into French law, this purchase obligation ceased to
apply for new large projects (over 12MW) from 1st Jan. 1999.
More than 100 distribution companies are active through a concession regime
in their local distribution area. Few, however, are of a significant size
(less than a dozen have sales of over 400 GWhs), or have eligible customers
in their concession area.

2) Regulatory Environment

The French Electricity law was passed on 10 February 2000, implementing
regulated third party access (TPA) in France under a transitional regime. The
law was approved one year late, failing to meet the required EU deadline.
Dozens  ["Dozens"  - I would replace this with "Several")  of application
decrees still have to be passed, including tariffs to eligible industrials.
The French power market is open to competition, however. About 60 eligible
industrials have so far switched totally or partly from the historical
supplier. Current threshold for eligibility is 16GWh (net of
auto-consumption) per year and per site, representing about 600 eligible
clients and 1,200 sites. The eligibility threshold will be reduced to 9GWh
per site by direct application of the EU Directive in Feb. 2003, as the
French government declined a quicker opening of the power market.

Eligibility of distribution companies is limited to the eligible consumption
of customers located in their concession area.
A three-year framework contract ( e.g., by way of a Master Agreement with a
minimum term of three years) is required for eligible customers, but
eligibles are free to deal for shorter maturity transactions within such a
three year contractual framework.

New IPPs have to be authorised through auctions or through direct decision
from the Ministry of Industry, which is the main route for authorisation.
Authorised IPPs in France are limited by Decree to trading buy for resale to
eligible customers a volume equivalent to 20% of the installed capacity,
including long term contracts. Trading is currently defined as the conditions
of power purchase for resale to eligible customers. These Trading
restrictions, however, do not apply to ECTRL, as we are not registered in
France. IPPs are free to sell and export power.

The French System Operator (RTE) was created on 1 July 2000 and is a
sub-division of EdF, although it is unbundled in terms of management and
accounting. A postage stamp tariff was implemented under the transitional
regime, which varies according to the voltage used,and which is based on a
matrix (Summer/Winter, Peak/OffPeak). Users have to contract transmission up
to the maximum capacity that they will use. RTE purchases excess capacity
available through transmission contracts at fixed prices, which represents
about half of the market price. Imbalances are settled under a published
tariff, which introduces high charges for imbalances beyond a 10% tolerance
level and 5MW. Although the criteria for eligibility is per site, and
eligible customers have to contract transmission for each site, RTE has
created programme responsible contracts (contrats de Responsable
d'Equilibre), which allow the aggregation of imbalance charges for different
eligible sites within an equilibrium perimeter defined with RTE.

Eligible customers, who are physically connected to the Grid, have to
contract for transmission vis-.-vis RTE (Contrat Made). Traders, such as
ECTRL, are not required to have such a transmission contract, as they do not
consume the power they purchase. Only a programme responsible contract
coupled with grid access contracts (import, export, and/or transit) are
required by RTE.

A new Decree is expected to be passed by Summer 2001, setting up new
conditions for transmission, transits and exports under a permanent regime.
It is likely that this new tariff will implement a 1/3 injection-2/3 delivery
calculation factor. Imports, which are allocated on a pro-rata basis, are
free of transmission charges.

Programme responsible contracts have established the basis of trading in
France through the exchange of blocs from one perimeter to another.  Enron
Capital & Trade Resources Limited ("ECTRL")  is programme responsible in
France. Cross border capacity is currently allocated on a first-come-first
served basis rule by RTE, and congestion fees are levied at the margin, which
favours long term contracts and does not give equal treatment to all players.
In addition, there is currently some lack of transparency with regards to RTE
real-time data on the capacity available/used for exports and imports. This
allocation rule is likely to change by end 2001. In addition, the CRE is
likely to request RTE to release additional data in the months to come.

The CRE (Commission de Regulation de l'Electricite) is the offical regulatory
body, which mainly covers TPA and tariff issues, while IPP licenses and
eligibility issues are covered by the Ministry of Industry.

3) Business Opportunity

Although we are currently under a transitional regime in France, the ability
to trade power already exists. Optimisation can be found through real-time
arbitrage between the flexibility of the industrial process, market prices
and optional structures. The establishment of programme responsible contracts
has created the basic conditions for an effective power trading market in
France. ECTRL closed the first physical power transaction in France early
2000, and was the very first new entrant to trade power (buy/sell) in France
late 2000.

An intraday market is now effective for transits, imports and exports, and is
expected to soon be extended to exchange of blocs in France.
Liquidity has been dramatically increasing (although the market remains
dominated by the historical player) thanks to RTE capacity auctions for
(auction has not been implemented on Spanish side yet) [QUERY: do we need
this bit in brackets??  What does it add??  Can't we just delete it??  Or is
it a note and someone has to write some better text here??  It just does not
read correctly in English owing to its place in the sentence at present] UK,
Italy and Spain interconnectors, RTE tenders for HV Grid losses, industrials
switching, and new players coming into the market. In addition, the European
Commission has determined that EdF will auction 6,000MW of virtual capacity
through VPP and PPA auctions in September 2001, representing about 30% of the
market for French eligible industrials This will further contribute to
increase liquidity.
A network code is currently under discussion between market players and
RTE.

4) Future Development

It is forecasted that both balancing market and spot exchange market will be
implemented by end 2001. Players in the balancing market will propose put and
call options, which will be exercised by RTE according to its own portfolio
of contacts (producer,consumer), thus providing RTE with physical balancing
capacity. The balancing market will also show referenced market prices for
balancing services.

The Some of the spot market volume is expected to be run by ParisBourse.
However, due to the dominant position of EdF, the limited number of active
IPPs, existing restrictions for trading for authorised producers in France,
and the lack of transparency with regard to current rules for allocation of
cross-border capacity and attribution of congestion costs, we believe that
the conditions for the creation of an effective spot power market in France
are not yet fully met. ECTRL has actively been lobbying in order to have fair
and transparent rules implemented for every player in the market and has
actively contributed for a spot market to take place.

However, thanks to an increasing number of players in France for trading,
imports, exports and transit, we are confident that the French power market
will develop rapidly.

5) The Gas Market Situation

A transitional regime was implemented on 10 August 2000 by direct application
of the EU Directive, thus establishing regulated TPA for sites whose
consumption is over 25 million cubic meters p.a. The eligibility threshold
will be reduced to 15million cubic meters in 2003, and 5 million cubic meters
in 2008. No gas law has been passed yet (forecasted mid 2002), and its is
expected that the transitional regime for gas in France will last until end
2002. A zonal/distance-related tariff was disclosed published on 13 July 2000
by GdF-Transportation. A permanent entry/exit tariff structure is likely to
be developed for 2003.  Charges  for imbalances are expensive, and access to
storage is restricted. GdF-Trading, however, has published conditions for
balancing services.
There is only one trading Hub for France located at the French/Belgian border
(Blaregnies/TaisniSres). Due to the distance-related nature of the
transportation tariff, competitive TPA is limited to eligible sites which are
located not too far (less than about 250Km) from the French/Belgian border.
The main imports into France are for high cal gas, and GdF has published the
conditions for high cal/low cal gas swaps.
As there is not yet a  [new??] gas law in France ( a Projet de Loi was
approved on 17th May 2000) transposing the EU Gas Directive into domestic
legislation, the Regulatory Commission has not been appointed to-date , and
the official regulatory body remains the Ministry of Industry.
Although current conditions do not facilitate full requirement supply to
customers from new entrants, it is already possible to optimise gas supply
through import of blocs for part or full supply. ECTRL was the first new
entrant to supply gas at the French border, and more recently into France.
ECTRL's cumulative volume of gas trades so far totals 550 million cubic
meters.

The above represents only Enron's and its affiliates views' and, accordingly,
neither Enron nor any of its affiliates is providing any advice to you in the
above information.  You are not entitled to rely on any of the above
information and you are advised to take such other independent advice as you
may deem necessary in respect of the matters referred to above.

---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron on 06/08/2001
10:05 PM ---------------------------
From: Bruno Gaillard on 06/01/2001 07:04 PM GDT
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Gas situation in France

----- Forwarded by Bruno Gaillard/EU/Enron on 01/06/2001 19:03 -----

	Bruno Gaillard
	24/05/2001 18:12

		 To: Philip Davies/Enron@EUEnronXGate
		 cc: Didier Magne/Enron@EUEnronXGate
		 Subject: Gas situation in France
Philip

Attached the relevant sections of a paper produced by EFET (largely by us) on
TPA in the French gas market and Enron comments to the EU on TPA issues. Note
that these papers were produced in December of 2000 and mid-Feb 2001
respectively. Notable changes since then include.

A relatively competitively priced conversion service (H-Cal to L-Cal gas) at
TaiseniSres has been but in place
The balancing regime has been improved and penalties are now indexed to
Zeebrugge (x 1.5 or x -0.5)
Access conditions to LNG have been published
Flexibility services are offered by GdF- Supply. The terms and conditions up
to now had been onerous. Recent talks between Didier and a customer suggest
that they have been wildly improved but this still needs to analysed by us.
Transit tariffs have been published but is also restricted to a  year-long.
The regulator is seriously considering changing the tariff structure from a
distance related structure to a entry/exit type structure.
The first hearing on the law (directive transposition) at the parliament has
been delayed from spring 2001 to summer 2002. Regulated tariffs will not
likely be put in place until 2003.

Let me know if you need more information.

Bruno

---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron on 06/08/2001
10:06 PM ---------------------------
From: Bruno Gaillard/Enron@EUEnronXGate on 06/01/2001 07:14 PM GDT
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: EdF capacity auctions

Information on capacity release program (VPP) in France

Letter below to the consultants of EDF

Decision on Merger imposing capacity release

Trustee mandate that we proposed to the EU

Initial VPP proposal by EDF

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Sankey, Ross
Sent: 01 June 2001 09:51
To: de Gaulle, Pierre
Cc: Gaillard, Bruno; Philip Davies/LON/ECT@ENRON; Brun, Raphael; Brod, Simon;
Styles, Peter; Dindarova, Nailia; Shaw, Eric; Elliott, Mark
Subject: RE: EdF capacity auctions

All,

I would suggest we need to do the following :-

? Register for the auction and receipt of the IM asap.  Bruno could you
please discuss with Mark and put together our registration document.  I
assume that ECTRL meets the criteria of a trader "registered" in an EU member
state?  Does not appear to be any need to deal with credit support or other
regulatory "qualifiers" such as balancing agreements as yet.  Mark - agree?
Bruno - could you please take care of sending this registration letter (agree
with Pierre who should act as principal contact).
? Establish once and for all the role of Trustee and CRE in the process of
approving capacity release phasing, auction process for each phase and
product specifications AND understand how the "consultation" process will
work once we have the IM.  Hence need to discuss with MTF, then Trustee and
CRE asap ie in June if possible.  Preferably before we meet again with
PWC/Roth....

In addition to Pierre's comments, the PIM also states that strike prices at
least are subject to Trustee review but a number of areas need to be
questioned.

? Capacity Release Phasing.  PIM confirms the 5 year period of the remdey but
also says a review can be requested after 3 years.  Bruno - you need to
review the remedy doc, but I do not see how a 2 year phasing of capacity
release complies with the remedy (at least in spirit).  We would suggest
there is no impediment to offering the FULL remedy in a single phase.  If
theere is insufficient demand they can always have a fall back position to
release unsold capacity on a 6 monthly or annual basis through the 5 year
period.  The current proposal is no more than EdF trying to minimise capacity
release and/or extract max value (can't blame them for trying but it is not
what we want or what remedy requires).  EdF's only real argument is that
phasing will allow more new suppliers to enter at a later date as eligiblity
threshold drops in France.  However, since eligible demand already exceeds
total capacity release this would limit development of competition to
existing eligibles.  As a minimum the release programme for all capacity
should be clearly defined up front; not at the whim of EdF.  Peter - thoughts
on this and how, in context of remedy, we can argue for accelerated single
phase auction (with possible reauctioning of unsold capacity over 5 years)?
? Auction Process : qualifying criteria likely to be more defined in IM; but
no obvious problems here.  I am less sure about nature of auction process.
We obviously need to think it through more, but why not just have a simple
process based on single sealed bids (or an electronic bid process).  The use
of price "clock" controlled by the auctioneer may allow a reserve price to be
set which is clearly not the intent of the remedy - this should be set at
zero for all product groups not subjectively "to ensure excess demand" but
only for certain groups!
? Product Specs : need to understand what if anything can be changed here.
Strikes seem to be subject to Trustee approval, but we need to understand
what else can be influenced eg within day flex.  Since we have already
covered this in previous submissions to MTF, EdF etc this should be easy to
identify as we go forward.

Any comments?

Ross

 -----Original Message-----
From:  de Gaulle, Pierre
Sent: 01 June 2001 09:00
To: Sankey, Ross
Cc: Gaillard, Bruno; Philip Davies/LON/ECT@ENRON; Brun, Raphael; Brod, Simon;
Styles, Peter; Dindarova, Nailia
Subject: RE: EdF capacity auctions & other EU news

Point 1.5: This info is of a preliminary nature and is subject to change. In
addition, it is mentioned in point 6 that registered companies for the
auction will have the opportunity to ask questions and raise issues during
conferences, which will be then considered by EdF.

Specifications of the auction will be finalised by end August. This seems to
leave some room for a complete feedback from registered companies. Let's
discuss the content of the PIM.

I suggest to arrange anothe meeting with PWC/Rothschild in the next few weeks
(week 11-16 June).

What about a potential meeting with the Trustee about the PIM?

Pierre

From: Ross Sankey/Enron@EUEnronXGate on 31/05/2001 19:31
To: Bruno Gaillard/Enron@EUEnronXGate, Philip Davies/LON/ECT@ENRON, Pierre de
Gaulle/LON/ECT@ECT, Raphael Brun/LON/ECT@ECT, Simon Brod/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Peter Styles/LON/ECT@ECT, Nailia Dindarova/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: RE: EdF capacity auctions & other EU news

Bruno,

Quel surprise.  Should make your follow up with the MTF interesting as to the
role of the Trustee.

One point to note for both MTF and Albers at COMP - the lack of within day
flexibility is hardly in keeping with the intention of supporting development
of retail supply to end users with fluctuating demand.  Suppliers will thus
be at the mercy of EdF in the balancing market.

In addition, how on earth can they be allowed to take 2 years to complete the
process?  How does that fit with merger remedy?

Somewhat ironic that they have the document in English!

Lets discuss what if anyhting we can do after you have spoken with MTF.

Regards,

Ross

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Gaillard, Bruno
Sent: 31 May 2001 19:03
To: Philip Davies/LON/ECT@ENRON; Sankey, Ross; de Gaulle, Pierre; Brun,
Raphael; Brod, Simon
Cc: Styles, Peter; Dindarova, Nailia
Subject: RE: EdF capacity auctions & other EU news

Obviously a done deal - interestingly the Trustee is not mentioned. EDF has
the capacity offering on its web page
http://www.edf.fr/htm/en/enchere/enchere and has a detailed document in
English but not in French yet. They also has EFET under industry links as
well as the CRE, DIGEC.

Attached is EDF's presentation of the product. After a quick look, it seems
that flexibility is not a option (nomination at noon, and price has not
changed)

 << File: VPP MIP.pdf >>
Bruno

31/05/01 UK: EDF ISSUES DETAILS OF ITS FIRST CAPACITY AUCTION.
LONDON, May 31 (Reuters) - French utility Electricite de France (EdF)
announced on Thursday details of its first auction to sell electricity
production capacity to competitors. EdF was required by the EU Commission in
February to give access to some of its generation capacity as a condition for
EU approval of its purchase of a 25 percent stake in German utility EnBW.
In the next two years, EdF will auction a total of 6,000 megawatts which
include 1,000 MW of peak capacity sold at a price of 26 euros per megawatt
hour (MWh) and 4,000 MW of baseload at a price of eight euros/MWh.
In addition, 1,000 MW of cogeneration production capacity will be made
available. Production from cogeneration plants is bought by EdF from smaller
producers under long-term contracts.
"With such contracts, electricity suppliers and traders will be able to have
electricity without the technical and operational risks of running a power
plant," said EdF in a statement.
The price for cogeneration capacity will be made public a few weeks before
the auction as it depends on gas price movements, EdF said.
The auction will take place in several tranches, the first one starting in
September, when 200 MW of peak capacity will be auctioned, 800 MW of baseload
and 190 MW of cogeneration.
The whole 6,000 MW should be sold by October 2003.
EdF, which has a 94 percent share of the French generation market, has a
total installed capacity of 103,500 MW.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Dindarova, Nailia
Sent: 31 May 2001 17:20
To: Gaillard, Bruno; Philip Davies/LON/ECT@ENRON
Subject: EdF capacity auctions & other EU news

FYI see attached
---------------------- Forwarded by Nailia Dindarova/LON/ECT on 31/05/2001
17:07 ---------------------------

 << OLE Object: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) >>
"Sandra James" <Sandra_James@electricity.org.uk> on 31/05/2001 17:11:51
To: <david.love@british-energy.com>, <rob.plaskitt@british-energy.com>,
<shercock@compuserve.com>, <jgreen3@edisonmission.com>, "Gwyn Dolben"
<Gwyn_Dolben@electricity.org.uk>, <KHanks@enron.com>,
<Nailia.Dindarova@enron.com>, <Peter.Styles@enron.com>,
<mwedg90@entergy.com>, <alison.cole@innogy.com>, <DAVID.TOLLEY@innogy.com>,
<peter.heffer@magnox.co.uk>, <ALAN.CLARK@natpower.com>,
<David.Burnett@nie.co.uk>, <Gordon.Dunlop@nie.co.uk>, <Chris.Price@pgen.com>,
<david.densley@scottish-southern.co.uk>, <shamblyn@seeboard.com>,
<Brian.Samuel@txu-europe.com>, <Phil.Hardy@txu-europe.com>,
<andy.papageorgi@uk.ngrid.com>, <christine.brown@uk.ngrid.com>,
<judith.ward@uk.ngrid.com>, <louise.petchell@uk.ngrid.com>,
<michael.metcalfe@uk.ngrid.com>, <James.Sheward@uuplc.co.uk>,
<Arthur.Probert@yeg.co.uk>, <gail.antrobus@yeg.co.uk>,
<Gail.Silcock@yeg.co.uk>, <joanne.bridge@yeg.co.uk>
cc:

Subject: EdF capacity auctions & other EU news

Dear All

Please see attached news items from this afternoon, including details of
EdF's sale of capacity.

Regards

Sandra

*****************************************************************
This e-mail is confidential. It is intended only for the person named.
Unless you are that person, or authorised to receive this e-mail, you
must not copy or use it or disclose it to anyone else.  If you have
received this e-mail in error, please contact the sender.  Thank you
for your cooperation.
Electricity Association Services Limited, 30 Millbank, London  SW1P 4RD
(Reg. in England No: 2366837).
*****************************************************************
 - eunews 31may pm.doc << File: eunews 31may pm.doc >>


Beginning this week, we are actively testing the changes to Path Manager to
receive real-time deal updates from Sitara.  To prepare for this, we would
like to have a limited group of schedulers from each desk go thru a quick
walkthru/training of the new features sometime early next week.  This should
only take about 30 minutes.  Once they are comfortable with the features and
performance, and once the testing is complete, we would like to migrate this
to Unify Production either next week or the week after.  This should give us
an adequate adjustment period prior to the next bid week.

Once it is migrated to Production, we can either roll it out to all
schedulers or to selected schedulers via security.

Heather, could you please schedule some time with the designated schedulers,
Scotty, and myself early next week.  A room with a projector would work best.

Thanks, d.n.


Mark,

please have a look in the "Long Descriptions" worksheet in the file attached.
Descriptions are combined from different components defined on other pages
per trading desk. Product lines in blue colour font on yellow background have
been already reviewed twice, blue on white - once, black on white - haven't
been reviewed yet.

Please e-mail/call if you have any questions or would like to have a fax as
well.
Regards,
Elena


I am back to full approval assistance!!!

	Tana Jones@ECT
	05/11/2001 11:30 AM

		 To: Marcus Nettelton/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: EOL Approvals: 05-09-01

I had a rush approval on this list, so while you were out having a baby
(well, actually Louise was doing all the hard work!), I called Leslie at home
at Elizabeth's direction because I had to get Sierra Pacific Holding Company
approved.  We are currently purchasing power from them and Ed Sacks said we
just gotten an EEI in place with them so Leslie approved them for both the
bid and offer on west power (even tho Credit is going to open them up for
purchases only).

No one has approved any other lists while you were out, so I have been
patiently been waiting your return...sniff...sniff...
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 05/11/2001 11:27 AM -----

	Tom Moran/ENRON@enronXgate
	05/09/2001 05:22 PM

		 To: Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel
Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/ENRON@enronXgate,
Debbie R Brackett/ENRON@enronXgate, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli
Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate, Cynthia Clark/ENRON@enronXgate, Enron Europe
Global CounterParty/LON/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/ENRON@enronXgate, Tom
Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Claudia Clark/ENRON@enronXgate, William S
Bradford/ENRON@enronXgate, Lisa Lees/ENRON@enronXgate, Juana
Fayett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jana Morse/Corp/Enron@Enron, Trang Le/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Paul Maley/LON/ECT@ECT, Sonya Clarke/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim Davies/LON/ECT@ECT,
Karen O'Day/ENRON@enronXgate, Tanya Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Kelly
Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron, Brian Lindsay/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, EOL Call Center@ECT, Bill D Hare/HOU/ECT@ect, Amy
Heffernan/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Molly LaFuze/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Danny Clark/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron, Teresa
Mandola/ENRON@enronXgate, Bill Kyle/ENRON@enronXgate, Amber Ebow/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Wendi Lebrocq/ENRON@enronXgate
		 cc:
		 Subject: EOL Approvals: 05-09-01

Please see attached

Regards,
Tom Moran
3-3017


Who do you think I would need to call about setting up a concession stand in a county building? "The county" is not an appropriate response.


Good afternoon Barry.

Please advise to the organizational attachment below.

 In addition,  if you have any further questions or comments, please feel
free to contact myself, or Scott Pleus.

Regards,

Inga Latson
Enron Broadband Services
Administrative Assistant II
Office#  713-853-3540

Scott Pleus
Enron Broadband Services
Office# 713-853-6577
Hm#  281-261-0499
Pgr#  713-761-4808
Mobile#  281-300-8286


can you follow up with the Forum group for me.  It appears only 3 of my six employees returned the feedback.  I have been assured by every member of my team that they sent these in on time.  Several members of our class yesterday had the same issue, with one not having any returned.  This seems curious enough to investigate.  Thanks for your help.
PL

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cruz, Magdelena
Sent:	Thursday, October 04, 2001 10:40 AM
To:	Bike, Anne; Couch, Greg; Dinari, Sabra L.; Grace, Rebecca M.; Keiser, Kam; Love, Phillip M.; Mcclure, Mark; McLaughlin Jr., Errol; Muzzy, Charles T.; Olinger, Kimberly S.; Severson, Russ; Sullivan, Patti; Valdes, John; Winfree, O'Neal D.; Wynne, Rita
Cc:	Prihoda, Melissa
Subject:	Becoming an Exceptional Leader: manager's training

REMINDER!!!!
 << OLE Object: Microsoft Clip Gallery >>

You are enrolled in the following.

Becoming an Exceptional Leader: a manager's level training
October 8, October 18 and November 8
8:30am - 5:00 pm (first 2 days)
8:30am - 3:00pm (3rd day)
Doubletree Hotel - LaSalle "A"

See you in class!!!
Maggie Cruz
x3-1816


Congratulations!

Gary Fitch@ENRON on 07/27/2000 12:02:47 PM
To: Bill Donovan/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Tax Valuations for YR2000

Bill, we hit a home run this morning with HCAD.  They have agreed to take my
reduced valuation on the Enron fleet.  A reduction of  $16,079,000 in taxable
value.  This results in savings of $482,375.  That's not all, our allocation
based on records for operations outside of the state of Texas resulted in
additional savings of $1,559,638. Total savings to our 2000 budget will be
$2,042,013.


Johnny,

What does Greg owe you for the champagne?  Is it $896.00?

Liz


In order for UBS Warburg to timely process your paycheck, I am requesting that all employee's accepting offers return any outstanding forms to my new desk location at  05852 on the 5th floor of ECS (Look for the Hamburg Flag) by noon this Friday  2/01/02.  This will prevent any benefit deductions from having to be "Double Deducted" on future checks.  Please attach a deposit slip or voided check stub to your direct deposit form.  Attached below are the forms needed for payroll/benefits, in case you did not turn these in at Orientation.  Lastly, please verify that your EHRonline home address is showing your current home address because all live checks will be mailed to your home residence.

Thanks, Tony Jarrett
Benefits
Ext. 3- 7829


Elizabeth,  The Duns number for Enron Compression Services Company is
072773547.   I will be completing the Agency Agreement this afternoon and
will forward to you.  Also I faxed the corporate data sheet for the company
to you yesterday.  Let me know if you need anything else.  Thanks for your
help.


No incremental credit reserve will be required, provided the transaction is
assigned directly to EDF/London Electricity or to an affiliate with parental
guaranty.

Rod

	From:  Sheila Glover                           07/13/2000 08:34 AM

To: Trena McFarland/LON/ECT@ECT, Rod Nelson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara
Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Clara Carrington/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laurel Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samantha
Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Sutton Bridge

Trena,
No P&L impact on unwinding deals, swap and hedge are Back to back
Do we have a contact to book the trades on the EDF side when appropriate?
Sara
Sara, Laurel will request copies of the original confirmations for the swap
and hedge and forwad to you
Need to coordinate day of unwind on ENA and rebooking by EDF based upon Legal
reassignment
Rod
Please advise whether a credit reserve was taken on this deal.
Thanks. Sheila

---------------------- Forwarded by Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT on 07/13/2000 08:19
AM ---------------------------

Trena McFarland
07/13/2000 05:48 AM
To: Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rod Nelson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara
Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

Everybody

Further to the sell-down of Sutton Bridge it looks like the originators are
planning, as part of that deal to assign infinity deal number 25556, a
currency swap we have with Sutton Bridge to EDF/London Electricity.  The
hedge for this deal is a back to back deal with Natwest, infinity deal number
25555.

My questions are:
When this swap was originally entered into there would have been a credit
reserve taken for it, which will have to be released.  How much is this and
what is the process?  I am assuming this release of credit will not effect my
traders P&L.  Can you please confirm this.

What else do we need to look at to complete this assignment?  What are the
legal implications?

The originator is looking to do this fairly quickly and so a quick response
would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks
Trena


CERA's view of where the market is going -- particularly w.r.t. ISOs/RTOs
---------------------- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/SFO/EES on 10/11/2000 10:42
AM ---------------------------

US Publishing <season@restructuringtoday.com> on 10/11/2000 11:19:07 AM
Please respond to season@restructuringtoday.com
To: "RT Reader" <season@restructuringtoday.com>
cc:
Subject: Restructuring Today, Wednesday October 11, 2000

(see attached file:  rt001011.pdf)

Thank you,

Season Hawksley
US Publishing
1-800-486-8201
www.restructuringtoday.com
season@restructuringtoday.com

 - rt001011.pdf


why?  scared to talk over email?

713/420-5807

-----Original Message-----
From: Clint.Dean@enron.com [mailto:Clint.Dean@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 10:29 AM
To: Mobley, Rena
Subject: RE:

What's your #?

"Mobley, Rena" <Rena.Mobley@ElPaso.com> on 05/21/2001 10:18:44 AM

To:   "'Clint.Dean@enron.com'" <Clint.Dean@enron.com>
cc:

Subject:  RE:

oh?  and.. how do you feel about it!

-----Original Message-----
From: Clint.Dean@enron.com [mailto:Clint.Dean@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 10:06 AM
To: Mobley, Rena
Subject: RE:

Well let me know when you figure it out.  I'm very curious.

"Mobley, Rena" <Rena.Mobley@ElPaso.com> on 05/21/2001 09:53:59 AM

To:   "'Clint.Dean@enron.com'" <Clint.Dean@enron.com>
cc:

Subject:  RE:

OHHHHH!!!!! sorry.

not sure.

-----Original Message-----
From: Clint.Dean@enron.com [mailto:Clint.Dean@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 9:30 AM
To: Mobley, Rena
Subject: RE:

Again, wow.  But I meant, how are you feeling about other stuff.

"Mobley, Rena" <Rena.Mobley@ElPaso.com> on 05/21/2001 09:23:24 AM

To:   "'Clint.Dean@enron.com'" <Clint.Dean@enron.com>
cc:

Subject:  RE:

I'm fine - we went and had breakfast and then up until about 6AM
talking!!!!!!  Got up and went home around 10 and then to the Astros game
yesterday - I WAS EXHAUSTED!!!!!!!!  And... how did you feel yesterday?

-----Original Message-----
From: Clint.Dean@enron.com [mailto:Clint.Dean@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 9:15 AM
To: Mobley, Rena
Subject: RE:

How are you doing?  I didn't know how you were feeling?

"Mobley, Rena" <Rena.Mobley@ElPaso.com> on 05/21/2001 09:07:03 AM

To:   "'Clint.Dean@enron.com'" <Clint.Dean@enron.com>
cc:

Subject:  RE:

I was wondering if I would hear from you today.  :)

-----Original Message-----
From: Clint.Dean@enron.com [mailto:Clint.Dean@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 9:05 AM
To: rena.mobley@elpaso.com
Subject:

Wow.

******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso
Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the
use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the
sender.
******************************************************************

******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso
Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the
use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the
sender.
******************************************************************

******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso
Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the
use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the
sender.
******************************************************************

******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso
Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the
use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the
sender.
******************************************************************

******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso
Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the
use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the
sender.
******************************************************************


I've changed it to Amerex.

Kerri Thompson@ENRON
05/02/2001 02:48 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: apb checkout

599676
broker says this is not there deal


Given that tonight's weather conditions may not permit dining alfresco, I was
wondering if we should come up with an alternative plan.  I think the first
order of business is whether or not we want to go some place we can eat or if
everyone just wants to meet up post dinner.  Depending on everyone's
preferences I have several suggestions.  Let me know your thoughts (regarding
tonight).


Start Date: 1/30/02; DayAhead market;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002013016.txt


Tom -

Call me a NX1+68 offer for the term and volumes listed.

Scott


Daren,  I will still have interconnect variance at this deal.  It will be
1191626 instead of 1746918.

Daren J Farmer
03/23/2000 02:53 PM
To: Thu Nguyen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Sherlyn Schumack/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Deal 156071 Feb 00

No, deal 156071 is good for days 7-29.

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Sherlyn Schumack/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Deal 156071 Feb 00

Daren,

 There are only two deals on PGEV pipeline: Deal #156071- valid 02/01/00 -
02/29/00, and Deal # 208083 - valid for 02/01/00 - 02/06/00.  Should there be
another deal for days 7-29??  Thanks

Thu

Daren J Farmer
03/23/2000 11:19 AM
To: Thu Nguyen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Deal 156071 Feb 00

The actuals should be allocated to the new ticket which has been nom'd,
tracked. and balanced.

D

	From:  Thu Nguyen                           03/22/2000 07:33 PM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Howard B Camp/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Deal 156071 Feb 00

Daren,

This is one of the deals which you told me to zero out.  Unfortunately, I do
not allocate PGEV.  Also,  Sherlyn has actualized PGEV and she has the
support from the pipeline for the 1746918 volume.  Please let me know if I
had missed something in our conversation.  Thanks

Thu


You are cordially invited to attend

If you are a new supervisor, an experienced supervisor without prior training
or a manager of new supervisors, come and learn more about our new ENA
Leadership Curriculum.  You will be introduced to the many courses and
learning resources that are available to you and where you need to go to find
them.  To aid in planning your developmental activities, you will receive a
copy of the curriculum guide that contains detailed information about the
curriculum.
Please RSVP by Friday, March 3 to Gracie Presas at ext. 3-3985.


Do we need to run this by SoCal?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Donoho, Lindy
Sent:	Friday, March 01, 2002 3:16 PM
To:	Watson, Kimberly; Lindberg, Lorraine; Lohman, TK; Lokay, Michelle; McConnell, Mark; Y'barbo, Paul; Kilmer III, Robert; Harris, Steven
Subject:	Draft - SoCal/Topock Announcement

Here's a simple first draft.  I didn't know how much detail we should get into.

Ramona, am I using the correct terminology?  They are not going to confirm in Cycle 1.  They are just going to let us fill-in where El Paso filled-up all the capacity downstream.

 << File: SoCal-TopockScheduling.doc >>

Let me know your comments.

Thanks!


A Real Time guy mistakenly sold to Coral instead of using their established
PGE transmission deal. 505750 has been killed and the transmission has been
re-scheduled under deal #146517.

Kate

Rhonda L Denton
01/26/2001 09:50 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: 505750

Please check this deal.  It is booked under Coral for transmission.  We don't
have a transmission contract with Coral and we don't usually sell
transmission.  Let me know.


Shubh,

How are you doing through all of the uncertainty associated with DPC these days? Are we still waiting for the lenders to decide whether or not they will continue funding the project? What is the MSEB's current position?

I'll give you a call Wednesday morning (Mumbai time).

Best Regards,

Paul


Phil's birthday is the 21st, so I was thinking that I might want to have a
birthday type dinner for him this Saturday.  Some place relatively casual but
good food (I obviously have put a lot of thought into this).  I was thinking
about dinner around 7:30.  Are you and Grant interested in joining us?  Julie
is babysitting for us.  I am going to see if she can come over around 3 so
Phil and I can also finish our Christmas shopping.  S.

Sheryl A. Gussett
Bracewell & Patterson, L.L.P.
711 Louisiana, Suite 2900
Houston, Texas 77002-2781
(713) 221-1210
(713) 221-2132 (fax)
sgussett@bracepatt.com


PrincetonLive.com <http://www.oxfordprinceton.com/images/blue/plive_new.gif>

    is proud to announce its newest web-
   based training course on hedging...

Tracking Correlation RiskTracking Correlation Risk <http://www.oxfordprinceton.com/blue/tcr.asp>
Ready to move up to a more advanced hedging experience? Meet Portia Bentley, champion race car driver and expert at negotiating tricky twists and turns - on the track and in the portfolio. Join Portia at the track and learn what correlation risk and basis risk are and how they affect hedging, the language, hedge efficiency and hedge ratio, forecasting and best practices.

Additional courses on our path to competency in hedging  <http://www.oxfordprinceton.com/blue/competency.asp>include:

A Guided Tour of Commodity Derivatives <http://www.oxfordprinceton.com/blue/gtcd.asp>
Back to the Futures <http://www.oxfordprinceton.com/blue/bttf.asp>
Options Always Die <http://www.oxfordprinceton.com/blue/oad.asp>
Charting a Course through Commodity Risk <http://www.oxfordprinceton.com/blue/cctcr.asp>
All Aboard the Hedge Express <http://www.oxfordprinceton.com/blue/aahe.asp>
Forwards and Swaps from the Flight Deck <http://www.oxfordprinceton.com/blue/fsfd.asp>
Hedging with Futures and Options <http://www.oxfordprinceton.com/blue/hfo.asp>
Understanding the Value-at-Risk Concept <http://www.oxfordprinceton.com/blue/uvar.asp>

For details on our path to competecy in hedging or general information please:
email - info@princetonlive.com <mailto:info@princetonlive.com>
tel - USA (609) 520-9099 ext. 131
UK +44 1865 250 521

PrincetonLive.com is the blue level of  The Oxford Princeton Programme

  _____

You are receiving this e-mail as a past delegate or contact of PrincetonLive.com. If you would rather not receive e-mail updates in the future or have any questions, please respond to: news@oxfordprinceton.com <mailto:news@oxfordprinceton.com>


I have reviewed the Dow Agreement wrt to the Dow Invoice Dated November 29, 2001 and have found the following

1.  2Q Lease Fee - $115,000
    3Q Lease Fee - $195,500.

Section 3.3 of the Agreement (as amended) provides for a lease fee of $25,000 per BCF based on 4.6 BCF until the date that gas injections begin in Enron's well (which was July 31, 2001) and a fee of $50,000 per BCF based on 4.6 BCF thereafter.  The fees are assessed per calendar quarter.  The above fees look to be OK.

2.  Final Mining Fee - $23,362.40
     Final Land Purchase Offset - ($47,013.75)

Section 6.5 through 6.8 of the Agreement provide for a detailed calculation of the Brine Fee due Dow based on the amount of salt removed from Enron's new well and a corresponding credit back to Enron for the conveyance of a 57.865 acres tract of land to Dow from Enron.  The credit is also based on the amount of Salt removed from Enron's new well.  Dow should provide detail on the salt removed and someone would need to go through the calcs in 6.5 through 6.8 to verify the above charges.

3.  Power Credit Adjustment - $16,500

I find no basis for this in the contract.

Under Schedule 3 to the Bridgeline Holdings, L.P. partnership agreement, Bridgline is obligated to bear all obligations under the Dow Agreement up to a maximum of $1,000,000 per year.  So Bridgeline should be paying these costs, assuming they haven't already paid up to $1,000,000.

Let me know if you have any questions.


Jeff --

You are scheduled to do a 30-minute telephone interview today at 2:30 p.m. with Fast Company magazine for an article about teaching.  The underlying premise for the article is that to be an effective leader, you must be an effective teacher within your organization.  The reporter, Chuck Salter, was referred to you by David Garvin at Harvard and by a Portland Oregonian reporter.  Given that you transformed how Enron does business by teaching the organization a new business model, this is an ideal opportunity for you and to highlight our non-traditional culture.  For the article, Chuck is also interviewing top executives at Pepsi, Yellow Warp, National Geographic and the Philadelphia Inquirer.

The interview questions are likely to include the following:

Tell me about the teaching you do at Enron, either formally or informally. What do you teach? Whom do you teach?
Why is it important to you?
What are the principles that guide your teaching?
What do leaders need to know, think about, and do to be better teachers?
How do you measure or evaluate teaching within a corporation?
Tell me about someone who has benefited from your teaching.
Tell me about your favorite teachers and what you learned about teaching from them.

I will come to your office at 2:30 to place the call.

Thank you.
Karen


I will call him.


A Message from your friends at:  	CustomOffers

This message has only been sent to Custom Offers elite members. Because you've made it into the "Elite Member" status, Custom Offers has hand picked this special offer just for you. (Please don't share it with anyone else).

"We have put this opportunity under a microscope and all we see is cash, cash, and more cash. Who would have thought something as simple as copying and pasting could be this profitable? If you are one of the lucky few to be selected as a Beta-Tester you can kiss your money worries goodbye."

 If You Qualify As A "Beta-Tester" Your Success Is 100% Guaranteed!   If you qualify, you will have a rare opportunity to "beta-test" the most advanced marketing system in the world, guaranteed to explode your income.  After 2 years of programming and development, you'll have a sneak preview and once in a lifetime opportunity to be part of our exclusive "beta-tester" team. It's your chance to make an insane income that will continue to grow each day you put this advanced marketing system to work for you.  Your income will be recurring every month and can easily grow far beyond your wildest dreams. To date, nothing has ever been created and released with this much power to create sales for you automatically. This advanced marketing system makes everything else obsolete and you'll know why the moment you see all the advanced features.  The advanced marketing system has been designed for complete ease of use, and will fully automate all your marketing tasks saving you valuable time and expense.  However, this one-time offer is NOT for everyone. You must qualify in order to be approved.  Positions are filling up fast, so see if you have what it takes to be part of this exclusive "beta-tester" team by clicking here now   Click Here Now

[IMAGE]If the above links do not work or appear, simply copy this URL and paste it into your browser's address field:   http://web1.customoffers.com/click.asp?lnk=1038&email=PMIMS@ENRON.COM     Your privacy is extremely important to us. You requested to receive this mailing, by registering at CustomOffers.com or by subscribing through one of our marketing partners. As a leader in permission-based email marketing, we are committed to delivering a highly rewarding experience, with offers that include bargains, entertainment, and money-making ideas. However, if you wish to unsubscribe, click here  or link to http://web1.customoffers.com/unsubscribe.asp?emid=601 . Third-party offers contained in this email are the sole responsibility of the offer originator.  [IMAGE]


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	GISB Update mtg.  Conference room EB47C2

Date:		4/9/2001
Time:		3:00 PM - 4:30 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


Jeff,

We've obtained a tariff filing that Sempra made with the CRE in Mexico to
determine the transportation rates charged by Sempra International to
transport gas in Mexico.  Can you help us determine the transport rate
charged to move gas from the California border to the Mexican border through
Socal and SDG&E?  I understand that SDG&E may be able to negotiate a rate
that includes the fee paid to Socal?  Is that correct?

What I'm trying to determine is what will be the rate for us to obtain a
backhaul from a new LNG regas terminal in Mexico, through the Sempra
International pipeline in Mexico and through SDG&E, to an end user behind
Socal?  Do you know how this works or do you have a suggestion on how we can
determine the max rates, plus determine what "actual" rates have been
negotiated?  We have discussions with Sempra this friday and want to table
the issue of firm backhauls.

Thanks

Kurt


---------------------- Forwarded by Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT on 03/08/2000 08:08
AM ---------------------------

Rahil Jafry
03/07/2000 03:13 PM
Sent by: Rahil Jafry
To: Louise Kitchen/LON/ECT@ECT, Dave Samuels/LON/ECT@ECT, David
Forster/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Goddard/LON/ECT@ECT, Awais Omar/LON/ECT@ECT, Greg
Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julie Ferrara/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mario Parra
Cardoso/Corp/Enron@Enron, Bob Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Williams' Energy Marketing and Trading Unit Acquires Equity Interest
In HoustonStreet.com...

---------------------- Forwarded by Rahil Jafry/HOU/ECT on 03/07/2000 03:07
PM ---------------------------

Williams' Energy Marketing and Trading Unit Acquires Equity Interest In
HoustonStreet.com

03/07/2000
PR Newswire
(Copyright (c) 2000, PR Newswire)

  TULSA, Okla., March 7 /PRNewswire/ -- Williams Energy Marketing & Trading
Co., a unit of Williams (NYSE: WMB), announced today that it is acquiring a
minority stake in Houston Street Exchange, a Web-based energy trading
exchange.

  Financial terms of the transaction were not disclosed.
  Since the launch of HoustonStreet.com in July 1999, Houston Street Exchange
has established itself as one of the industry's most dynamic
business-to-business exchanges for wholesale power trading.  HoustonStreet.com
recently announced plans to launch new Web-based platforms for trading crude
and refined products at the wholesale level.

  "Emerging technologies continue to change the way the energy industry
operates, and HoustonStreet.com is on the leading edge of the revolution.
Internet-based trading has exploded, and we believe that this investment will
allow us to play a significant role in the development of new markets and
platforms," said Bill Hobbs, president of Williams Energy Marketing & Trading.

  "The investment in HoustonStreet.com is just one piece of Williams'
eBusiness strategy," added Nancy Gustine, director of eBusiness for Williams
Energy Marketing & Trading.  "By acquiring a stake in this innovator in the
electronic-exchange industry, we can capitalize on our marketing strengths
while helping them transform the trading industry."

  "To have one of the leading energy companies in the country invest in our
trading platform is a direct validation of our technology and our vision for
the future of energy trading" said Frank Getman, president and CEO of Houston
Street Exchange.  "We look forward to Williams' market strength and support in
creating the premier online energy trading platform across multiple
commodities."

  Williams' energy marketing and trading unit buys and sells all types of
energy products nationwide including natural gas and gas liquids, crude oil
and refined products and electricity.  The unit also manages its customers'
exposure to volatile energy prices using comprehensive risk management
services and creates customized energy financing solutions for producers and
end-users.

  About Houston Street Exchange

  Designed by traders for traders, Houston Street Exchange represents the
first Web portal for the trading of wholesale energy products.
HoustonStreet.com provides an online trading engine that allows traders to buy
and sell their energy products faster, more efficiently and more easily than
they do today.  Houston Street Exchange is headquartered in Portsmouth, New
Hampshire, with offices in Houston, Texas.  Houston Street Exchange is a
majority-owned subsidiary of BayCorp Holdings, Ltd. (Amex: MWH).  For more
information, visit Houston Street at www.houstonstreet.com.

  About Williams

  Williams, through its subsidiaries, connects businesses to energy and
communications.  The company delivers innovative, reliable products and
services through its extensive networks of energy-distributing pipelines and
high-speed fiber-optic cables, comprehensive energy services, including
commodity trading and risk management, and business communications systems,
international satellite and fiber-optic video services.  Based in Tulsa,
Okla., Williams operates about $25 billion in assets.  Company information is
available at www.williams.com.

  Portions of this document may constitute forward-looking statements as
defined by Federal law.  Although the company believes any such statements are
based on reasonable assumptions, there is no assurance that actual outcomes
will not be materially different.  Additional information about issues that
could lead to material changes in performance is contained in the company's
annual report or form 10K, which is filed with the Securities Exchange
Commission.

/CONTACT:  Patty McKissick, Media Relations, 918-573-5738, or email,
patty.mckissick@williams.com, or D'Ann Riley, Investor Relations,
918-573-8088, or email, d'ann.riley@williams.com, both of Williams/
15:06 EST

Folder Name: Rahil Jafry
Relevance Score on Scale of 100: 82

______________________________________________________________________

To review or revise your folder, visit http://www.djinteractive.com or
contact Dow Jones Customer Service by e-mail at custom.news@bis.dowjones.com
or by phone at 800-369-7466. (Outside the U.S. and Canada, call 609-452-1511
or contact your local sales representative.)
______________________________________________________________________

Copyright (c) 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved


Dana,

     Are you coming to power time?  If so, can you come early?  I just need
someone to pray with me and for me.  Satan is on my trail fast and furious.

Let me know.

Denise


---------------------- Forwarded by Rosalee Fleming/Corp/Enron on 12/13/2000
05:59 PM ---------------------------

Kathy Mayfield
12/13/2000 05:02 PM

To: Rosalee Fleming/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Thank you for the Charitygift

---------------------- Forwarded by Kathy Mayfield/Corp/Enron on 12/13/2000
04:38 PM ---------------------------

bill_morgan@kindermorgan.com on 12/13/2000 04:34:58 PM
To: kathy.mayfield@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Thank you for the Charitygift

Thank you for the Charity Gift Card.  I decided to donate the gift to the
Depelchin Children's Center.


Shirley,

Please, register me for Friday.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 07/11/2000
08:09 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Ken Lay, Jeff Skilling & Joe Sutton @ ENRON
07/10/2000 05:47 PM

Sent by: Office of the Chairman@ENRON
To: All Vice Presidents and Above
cc:
Subject: United Way Executive Breakfasts

Please join us for one of the Executive Breakfasts at DePelchin Children,s
Center, our adopted agency for this year and one of the more than 80
community organizations supported by the United Way of the Texas Gulf Coast.
The Executive Breakfasts will focus on our 2000 campaign.  To reach our goal
of  $2,310,000, it will take the active leadership and support of each of
you. We look forward to seeing all of you at one of the breakfasts.

Event:  Executive Breakfast
Date:  Thursday, August 3, 2000 (hosted by Joe Sutton)
   or
  Friday, August 4, 2000 (hosted by Jeff Skilling)
Time:  7:45-9:00 a.m.
Location: DePelchin Children,s Center
  100 Sandman (close to Memorial and Shepherd intersection)

Transportation: Bus will depart from the Enron Building (Andrews Street side)
promptly at 7:30 a.m.

NOTE: Bus transportation is encouraged, due to limited onsite parking.
However, if you should need to drive, a map will be provided.

Please R.S.V.P. no later than Wednesday, July 26 to confirm your attendance
and bus transportation to Jessica Nunez
at 853-1918.


When we have described the problems and solutions for California we have
focussed on generation siting and flexibility to hedge.  We have stayed away
from transmission issues on the assumption that California, with its ISO and
PX, does not suffer from the same discrimination issues as other parts of the
country.  Is this true?  Does California's system layer in priorities for
utility use of the system -- eg doesn't PG&E control "path 15"?  Does that
control provide advantageous access to PG&E?  Are there other examples and
are there links between these "preferences" and the current problems in
California?  As we are trying to convert reliability and pricing concerns
into FERC action these would be helpful arguments to have available to us.


How is your day going????
Are you having a Happy Birthday??
You will be happy to know that I am bringing home some
leftovers from today.
See you later.
Megan

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals.
http://personals.yahoo.com


1.  Section 18.5(a)--Should make "equipment maunfacturer and supplier".
2.  Section 18.5--Events where FCE failed to act in accordance with industry
standards.
3.  Section 18.5--Events where FCE failed to ship units on a reasonable
commercial basis.
4.  Section 18.5--Events related to FCE's creditworthiness.
5.  Section 18.4 (c)--Should we narrow a bit.
6.  Section 22.1--Can't we add clarifying language.
7.  Where is release concept?


Team,

I finally got a chance to talk to Entergy about their merchant peaker in
their own service territory.  Specifics are as follows:

Configuration: 4 x GE 7EA's at 72 - 73 MW each because of elevation and
humidity levels.
Location: Vicksburg, MS sharing a site with the Baxter Wilson plant (1320 MW
coal/gas fired boiler)
HHV: 12,200 btu/kwh
Pipe: A new intra-state that will be shared with the Baxter Wilson plant.
Existing sources are Koch and Duke.
Start date: 7/01
Permits: PSD permit at 9 ppm.  No run hour limitation.
Taxes: Fee in lieu of taxes at 1/3 cost for first ten years.  Full property
taxes thereafter.  Entergy claims this is the same deal Ben Jacoby got for
our peaker in MS.

First we need to model a pro-forma of plant operating costs using estimates
of FOM and VOM from internal sources.
Second, we need to calculate spread option valuations of the underlying plant
for 20-years using curve, vol and correlation assumptions acceptable to the
desk.
Thirdly and based on 20-year plant valuations, I need to create a debt
service schedule.
Finally, we have to price the put option premium and sensitivities using the
research/structuring model.

Any questions, please call me at 3-4750.

regards,

Don


Is the Baja for April transport in sitara?  Please let me know.

Thanks,
MIke


The report named: West VaR <http://trv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=36&report_name=West+VaR&category_cd=2&category_name=WEST&toc_hide=1&sTV1=2&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=11/20/2001>, published as of 11/20/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


I have reviewed the special provisions for the GISB,  we agree to your
provisions however, I have a question with regards to no. 6.  The last
sentence states, " ..each party agrees that either party may use these
recordings in its business affairs as it deems appropriate."  My concerns are
founded in the use of "these recordings".  As the GISB does not have a
provision for confidentiality we are concerned with the use of these
recordings.  Also,  we want to be the confirming party.

Best regards,
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Sara,

Please contact either Paul Radous or me on credit derivatives in the U.S.
Rod Nelson is the lead credit support for EnronCredit.com and should also be
available in London, if necessary.  I am not aware of these recent trades but
I am having lunch with Jeff Kinneman on Thursday to discuss among other
things Credit support for his business.

It does concern me that we would offer to provide collateral DLJ without
Treasury's approval.

Bill

From: Sara Shackleton on 08/28/2000 06:53 PM
To: William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Credit Derivatives

I am seeing more and more credit derivatives.  The trades originating in
Houston are coming from Jeff Kinneman's bond/debt traders but are booked in
the name of ECT Investments, Inc. or ENA.  I can't be certain if these are
backed to EnronCredit.com Limited.

In particular, there is a proposed total return bond trade with DLJ
International Capital requiring ECT Investments to post collateral.  We have
no master with this party.  Who in Houston credit  is looking at credit
derivatives?

FYI, other credit deals seem to be transacted wtih Deutsche Bank and UBS AG.