This legislator is very bright and articulate -- he obviously "gets it"

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 07/13/2001 03:54 PM -----

	Peter Bray@NEWPOWER 07/13/2001 09:40 AM 	   To: susan.j.mara@enron.com  cc:   Subject: From Assemblyman John Campbell's Laptop To Yours, 7/13/01

Y'all could have an ally in John Campbell, to the extent you want to work the Sacramento leagues...   Peter

----- Forwarded by Peter Bray/HOU/NewPower on 07/13/01 09:38 AM -----

	   "Cowen, Jennifer" <Jennifer.Cowen@asm.ca.gov> 07/13/01     09:19 AM 	    To:    cc:    Subject: From Assemblyman John Campbell's Laptop To Yours, 7/13/01

Campbell's Capitol Communications

Weekly Report
July 13, 2001

Governor's myths

We have known for some time that Gray Davis is a much better fundraiser and
political spin doctor than he is a Governor, but lately he is taking the
spin way too far. He is so desperate to find villains with whom he can
deflect focus from his own record that he continues to ignore facts. Here is
my effort to set the record straight on several of the Governor's, and his
lackeys, recent
pronouncements on energy and the budget.
Energy:
MYTH:  "All Texans are evil"
His spokesman said, "Anywhere they wear cowboy hats, they probably have
handkerchiefs across their face because they are robbing us blind."
Why he said it: George Bush is from Texas and is a convenient scapegoat.
FACT: Only 2 of the 12 largest energy suppliers to California are from Texas
and they provide only 9% of the state's energy use.

MYTH:  "Private power generators charged California the most"
Governor Davis said, "What's going on here, pure and simple, is
unconscionable price-gouging by the big energy producers."
Why he said it: Polls show that it is easier to blame power generators for
the energy crisis than anyone else. FACT: The private company power
generators charged substantially lower prices over the last few months for
energy than the public agencies.  In fact, documents recently released
reveal that Enron and Mirant averaged $181 and $225 per megawatt while LADWP
and Sacramento Municipal averaged $292 and $330 for energy sold to the state
during the first quarter of this year.

MYTH:  "Power companies manipulated prices"
Governor Davis said,  "Their testimony could be the "smoking gun" that
demonstrates there was improper manipulation of California's electricity
market."
Why he said it: another way to say, "its not my fault, its their fault"
FACT: Duke energy shut its plant down because it was ordered to, in order to
balance the grid, by the California ISO, an entity overseen entirely by
Davis appointees.
Budget:
MYTH:  "Republicans want to cut education spending"
A lead education appointee said, "We feel very strongly that agreeing to
that would put us in a position where children would lose." Why it was said:
he needs to think of something to justify his tax increase. FACT:
Republicans have never proposed cuts in education out of the current budget.
We have instead proposed reducing pork, entirely new or expanded
programs, and cutting funded but vacant bureaucratic positions.

MYTH:  "The $1.2 billion sales tax increase is not a tax increase"
The Governor said, "They've just invented this argument about a tax
increase. It's just nonsense. It's not a tax increase."
Why he said it: he wants to maintain the illusion of being a fiscal
conservative FACT: One year ago, when the sales tax was cut, Davis had a
news conference announcing "This tax decrease will benefit every
Californian.  It will put even more of our prosperity in the hands of those
who created it in the first place - the taxpayers of this State." Now, when
the same tax goes up, it is not a tax increase?
I will let you figure out for yourself whether or not these myths are indeed
myths -- I only hope that you won't be using the Governor's statements for
your facts.

Until next week, that's all for this week.

John Campbell

Feel free to forward this e-mail to a friend!

If you wish to be taken off this e-mail list, please notify me.
Jennifer Cowen, District Director
Assemblyman John Campbell, 70th District
949.863.7070
949.863.9337 fax


Fred,

If we have the same purchaser for both, it would be a lot easier to agree to
the form, then duplicate it.  Do you see any problem with this? I will have
to have the electronic form emailed to me, then I can make the changes.  I
brought the hard copy, but I don't have access to the electronic form. Have
they indicated if they want to go forward with this, or are they still
kicking tires?  I need to set priorities, so it would help to know what's
most important, especially since I'm on the road.  Do we want to continue
marketing the sites during the time period between signing and termination?
I don't think 3 weeks would be a problem after signing.  No TurboPark!!!

On the issue of the conference call Friday, I have a meeting with the
customer which starts in the am, then I'm on the road.  Monday would be 1000
times better, if this is at all possible.  In that won't work, I will have
more details about timing of my Friday meeting tomorrow.

Thanks,

Kay


Flu Shot Clinic Sponsored By Enron

When:  Tuesday, November 13, 2001
				        Time: 8:30 a.m.-10:30 a.m.
				        Where:  Enron 3WTC Office
					Who: Enron employees, spouses and domestic partners are 							welcome to participate

Please sign up, via email to Josie Jarnagin,  by Tuesday, November 6, 2001.

The following is a list of employees already signed up for the clinic.

Last Name	First Name	Quantity
Alport	Kysa	1
Axford	Kathy	1
Belden	Tim	2
Bruce	James	1
Calger 	Chris	1
Clark	Ed	2
Cutsforth	Diane	1
Davidson	Debra	1
Driscoll	Michael	1
Elafandi	Mo	1
Eriksson	Fredrik	1
Fuller	Dave	1
Gilbert	Jim	2
Gustafson	Mollie	1
Hall	Steve	1
Hall	Erin	1
Malowney	John	1
Mays	Wayne	1
Meyer	Jim	1
Miles	Darryl	2
Mumm	Chris	1
Nalluri	Susmitha	2
Nelson	Kourtney	1
Oh	John	1
Rance	Susan	2
Rasmussen	Dale	1
Semperger	Cara	2
Sheppard	Kathryn	1
Shields	Jeff	2
Slaughter	Jeff	2
Soderquist	Larry	1
Van Gelder	Jon	2
Villeggiante	Theresa	1
Wente	Laura	1
Williams	Bill	1
Williams III	Bill	1
Yoder	Christian	2


She used to schedule gas at Entergy.  She started here today and she was asking about you.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Monday, June 04, 2001 9:15 AM
To:	Huble, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

I dont know who that is

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Huble, Amanda
Sent:	Monday, June 04, 2001 9:10 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:

Have you seen Lisa Trofholz yet?

Amanda K. Huble
Gas Fundamentals
Phone: (713) 853-4384
Pager: (877) 482-0772
Fax: (713) 646-8453


Watch the Tigers Wreck the Rebels!
LSU vs. Ole Miss - October 27, 2001 @ 8:00pm
Come watch at Woodrow's under the big tent!

(Note that parking will be available in the office building next door as
well as the normal areas - coming from Richmond, go past the office
building next to Woodrow's and take a right to get to the parking garage.
Parking is available for cars and small SUV's - due to clearance
restrictions, large vehicles are not allowed to park in the garage)

For those unable to make it to Woodrow's, Nick's Place will be showing the
game as well.

Also, for our travelling Tigers, note the following construction update
from La. DOTD:

DOTD is doing roadwork on I-10 around the Hwy 165 area in Jeff Davis
Parish.
Houston-area Tiger fans should be advised to take evasive manuevers....i.e.
exit Iowa and head south to Hwy 90....go east on 90 to Welsh, and then back
to I-10.  See the link:

http://www2.dotd.state.la.us/construc/map.asp?project=jeffdav

______________________________________________________________________
This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential
and is the property of the Cap Gemini Ernst & Young Group.  It is intended
only for the person to whom it is addressed.  If you are not the intended
recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy,
disseminate, distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you
receive this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and
delete all copies of this message


Ceci,

I received the list of properties you mailed.  Thank you very much.  I would like to stay updated on the market in Hood River and the surrounding areas in Washington as well.  I would be interested in lots as well as homes.  In case you don't still have it, my address is 8855 Merlin Ct, Houston, TX 77055.

Thank you,

Phillip Allen


All of the EOL deals are included in this assignment. This assignment agreement template we have is EOL specific.  If you could forward us a template for non-EOL, we will take care of that deal separately, or you can adjust this agreement to account for all deals.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hunter, Larry Joe
Sent:	Monday, August 13, 2001 1:14 PM
To:	Mulvany, Patrick
Cc:	Anderson, Diane
Subject:	FW: Sequent Energy Management- Assignment
Importance:	High

Patrick,

Can you take care of this?

Thanks,
Joe

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Heard, Marie
Sent:	Monday, August 13, 2001 1:09 PM
To:	Hunter, Larry Joe
Cc:	Espinoza, Veronica
Subject:	FW: Sequent Energy Management- Assignment
Importance:	High

Hi, Joe:

Tana said I should forward this e-mail to you and that you guys would prepare the assignment and send to us for review.  Let me know if this is not the case.  Please note that all of the deals, with the exception of the first one, are EOL deals.

Thanks for your help.

Marie

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Espinoza, Veronica
Sent:	Monday, August 13, 2001 11:09 AM
To:	Bailey, Susan; Boyd, Samantha; Heard, Marie; Panus, Stephanie
Cc:	Jones, Tana
Subject:	Sequent Energy Management- Assignment
Importance:	High

Legal Team,

Per the recent change in Company structure for Sequent Energy Management, LLC there are a number of financial deals that must be assigned over to the correct entity--Sequent Energy Management, LP.  Please prepare trade assignment documentation for the following deals (please note that all of these deals, except for the first one, were executed on EOL):

VT2401.1
VM7262.1
VM7369.1
VM7677.1
VM8690.1
VM8778.1
VN2395.1
VN3448.1
VN4598.1
VN4726.1
VP3529.1
VP3704.1
VQ0698.1
VR2661.1
VR2666.1
VU0121.1
VU1540.1

Also, ENA does not have an ISDA in place with the counterparty--all deals were confirmed under GTC's.  Please give me a call if you need any other info.

Thanks again,

Veronica Espinoza
x6-6002


---------------------- Forwarded by Mike Grigsby/HOU/ECT on 01/09/2001 09:36
PM ---------------------------
From: Matthew Lenhart on 01/09/2001 03:11 PM
To: Mike Grigsby/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: updated socal forecast


Louise, need to ask a question for clarification.  TBG is ready to sign.  The settlement is structured to change the transaction beginning Nov 1.  If we delay, they may revert in Nov to operating and scheduling volumes according to the existing agreement and not the settlement agreement, which is bad for ENA.  A bit of a balancing act but I think that I have it under control.  My question is this.  Can I move forward with the execution of the Settlement IF the payment is not required until Nov 30 ?  I am sorry and I may be splitting hairs, but don't want this to slip away.  If I need to hold off on everything I will do what is needed.

Frank


Get ready, here it comes!  Actually, you have a little time to mentally
prepare yourselves.

July 20 - We'll receive the worksheet file from the financial group.

August 6 - Worksheets are due to me, and internal budget review meetings will
take place during this week.

August 13 - I'll submit the worksheets back to the financial group.

August 20 - 31 - Corporate holds budget review meetings.  Any
changes/adjustments to submitted budgets will begin.

September 14 - Finance will distribute preliminary allocations to business
units.

Please call me if you have any questions,
Elizabeth


Please add Financial and Control group to these book requests if they are missing.  We would like for everyone to have access to these books that is on that matrix we sent you.  Thanks.
PL

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Keiser, Kam
Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 1:01 PM
To:	Trevino, Susan
Cc:	Love, Phillip M.; Winfree, O'Neal D.; Giron, Darron C.; McLaughlin Jr., Errol; Palmer, B. Scott
Subject:	new book req

Susan,

These are book requests for the Netco books for all regions.

Please let me know if you have any questions.  We put in some book and portfolio codes we would like if they are available.  If not, please call me.  We need all price, basis, index, and gas daily US books to be the same, all Canadian books to be the same and all physical books to have the same codes please.

Thanks

Kam

 << File: Book Request Form  Financial.xls >>  << File: Book Request Form Central.xls >>  << File: Book Request Form East.xls >>  << File: Book Request Form Texas.xls >>  << File: Book Request Form West.xls >>


----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 11/28/2000 08:38 AM -----

	Richard B Sanders
	Sent by: Twanda Sweet
	09/20/2000 05:04 PM

		 To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: TVA

I have enclosed a draft of the letter we spoke about yesterday.


MARKET NOTICE
February 4, 2002

The California Independent System Operator (ISO) is announcing the
Aggregated Distributed Generation Pilot Project (ADGPP).  The participation
of Generating Units in the ISO's markets is currently limited to units with
a rated capacity of 1 MW or greater.  The ADGPP is intended to demonstrate
the feasibility of allowing physically separated small units (less than 1
MW) to be aggregated as a means of reducing barriers to entry into the ISO
markets.  ADGPP is currently intended to operate as follows:

*	Generation units with a rated capacity of less than 1 MW may
participate
*	Generators will be aggregated through an Aggregated Distributed Unit
(ADU), which will have an aggregated or total rated capacity greater than or
equal to 1 MW but no more than 10 MW
*	The total capacity for all units participating in this Pilot Project
is limited to 50 MWs
*	ADUs must contain generators that are in the same Demand Zone which
are not on opposite sides of constrained transmission elements
*	Each ADU must be scheduled in the ISO Energy or Supplemental Energy
Market
*	Near real-time operational data will be required from ADU
*	Prospective participants can propose unique methods and processes
for delivering the near real time operational data
*	Generators will be considered SC Metered Entities, therefore they
must have Local Regulatory Authority approved interval metering
*	Settlement will occur through submitting aggregated Settlement
Quality Meter Data (SQMD) by the SC representing the ADU

As noted above, units participating in the ADGPP will be allowed to
participate in the ISO Energy and Supplemental Energy Markets only and will
not be allowed to participate in the ISO's Ancillary Services markets.  The
increased participation in the ISO Energy and Supplemental Energy markets
will provide greater market depth and will increase competition by expanding
the pool of generation available within the ISO Control Area.  The ADGPP is
intended only to accommodate units less than 1 MW and is not intended to
facilitate "portfolio bidding" from Generating Units 1 MW or larger.

The ADGPP is also intended to improve the ISO's visibility of generating
resources within the ISO Control Area by demonstrating the functionality of
various basic-level operational data reporting processes which may be
proposed by the prospective participants.  These operational data reporting
processes should demonstrate the capability of delivering operational data
for the ADU to the ISO near real time and be economical from the small
Generator perspective.  The uniqueness of the operational data reporting
processes proposed will be one factor in selection of participants in the
program.  Thus, the project will also ensure that the participation of these
resources in the ISO's markets will occur without compromising system
reliability.

The ISO will be hosting a Workshop on Friday, March 8th to discuss the Pilot
Project details.  Please contact Sue Happ (916) 608-7059 for reservations.
Participation in the workshop will only be allowed if reservations are made
in advance.

Workshop Objectives:

Members of the ISO staff from Metering, EMS, IT Security, Operations and
Market Services will be available to provide a general description of the
Pilot Program and to answer any questions from prospective participants.  An
agenda and directions to the workshop will be provided on March 1st.

Workshop Target Audience:

Aggregators, Scheduling Coordinators and Prospective Generators.

The ISO will allocate two hours on the agenda to interested Aggregators or
Scheduling Coordinators.  If you are interested in providing a presentation,
please Contact Ali Miremadi at (916) 608-7061 by February 22nd
.
Client Relations Communications.0407
CRCommunications@caiso.com <mailto:CRCommunications@caiso.com>


I understand that you guys have retained Holland and Hart to give us another
set of eyes on the Navajo issues.  For future reference, I have finally
hooked up with the South Dakota firm I mentioned and was favorably impressed
with their experience in similar matters.  Don Schultz and a couple of his
partners have substantial litigation experience both for and against the S.D.
tribes (Ogalla Sioux, etc.) on federal jurisdictional issues.  One of Don's
partners is general counsel of the Rushmore Electric Cooperative in Western
South Dakota and has had dealings with the tribes on right of way issues for
years.   They have cleared conflicts, and are available  if we ever need a
third opinion or if we get into a spat with the tribes elsewhere.  Sorry it
took me so long to run this to ground.  Thanks. DF


I found these in an old unused directory
----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 03/21/2001 09:02 AM -----

	Kristi I Louthan
	08/11/2000 12:02 PM

		 To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, John L Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Cargo/Storage Claim - Styrene at Baytank

---------------------- Forwarded by Kristi I Louthan/HOU/ECT on 08/11/2000
03:12 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Lisa Walker                           07/18/2000 03:02 PM

To: Kristi I Louthan/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Cargo/Storage Claim - Styrene at Baytank

---------------------- Forwarded by Lisa Walker/HOU/ECT on 07/18/2000 03:00
PM ---------------------------

"Ted Rosen" <trosen@jwortham.com> on 07/17/2000 03:14:55 PM
To: <Lisa.Walker@enron.com>, <James.P.Studdert@enron.com>,
"<"<selliot@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Cargo/Storage Claim - Styrene at Baytank

I spoke to the head adjuster Sharron West this morning regarding this claim.
She has discussed same with their chemist Bob Ash.

Sharron has reached some conclusions that are far different from the claim
which was submitted to her.  From our conversation, the main differences seem
to be:

1.  She is calculating the claim using the basis of valuation in the Philco
contract.  That basis of valuation seems to coincide with your monthly
storage declarations.   Your calculations appear to be based more on the spot
price of the product. I believe the difference is around $.10 per lb which is
very significant when so many lbs are involved.

2.  There appears to be a discrepancy in the number of pounds involved in the
claim.  Baytank's records seem to indicate around 2,000,000 lbs. whereas your
claim references approx. 6,000,000 lbs.   Both Sharron and Bob think that a
maximum of 4,000,000 lbs. should be considered.

3.  Ancillary charges.  The Enron claim appears to include some Baytank
charges that are not recoverable, such as tank cleaning, etc.  As a cargo
policy normally insures against direct physical loss or damage to the product
itself, there are some charges that are not recoverable under a cargo
policy.   There also appear to be stock throughput charges in your claim
through January of 2000, although the product would have been gone by the end
of November.

At any rate,  based on the valuation of product in the Philco contract (and
the storage declarations that have been submitted for premium purposes), and
there being a total of 4,000,000 pounds of product, Sharron has calculateda
claim in the vicinity of $150,000.  This is obviously a far cry from the
claim submitted of around $900,000+.   Of course, if you consider a
difference of $.10 /lb. and apply it to 4,000,000 lbs, you already have a
difference of $400,000.  If you then factor in the difference between
6,000,000 lbs claimed vs. 4,000,000 lbs. recognized by the adjusters, you
have another significant sum.

I would be interested in your comments at this point.  If you feel that the
adjuster has everything wrong, I might suggest that we arrange a meeting and
go through the claim point by point. This is sometimes the quickedt way to
resolve major differences.

Please let me know.

Thanks and regards,

Ted Rosen


Sara,
     Here is the last email exchanged with Jason.  My notes below state the
last status I had:

10/6/00 -Attorney conference call with Jason Peters - transfer, arbitration
and fall back - finalized but Jason must check with Enron counsel.  Called
Jason for status 10/27/00.  Susan Baily called to say their attorneys are
backlogged (Sara Shakelton) and not pushing the IDSA remaining comments
(arbitration, transfer) until we are doing business again 11/20/00.
Emailed Jason for status since trading swaps 12/8/00.  Left voice mail
message for Jason 1/5/01 for status.  Contacted Sara for status 3/26/01 -
left message.

     Suggest we set up a conference call with our Attorney Janine Huber to
finalize any remaining issues.  What is your availability this week?

Maria

----- Forwarded by Maria R. Gelnett on 03/27/2001 03:12 PM -----

                    Maria R.
                    Gelnett              To:     jpeters@andrews-kurth.com
                                         cc:
                    10/04/2000           Subject:     ISDA Negotiation
                    12:57 PM

Jason,
     In addition, please consider:

4(d) - Removal of reference to confirm since using standard ISDA form.
5(j)(c) - Make it bilateral.

Thank you.
---------------------- Forwarded by Maria R. Gelnett on 10/04/2000 12:52 PM
---------------------------

Maria R. Gelnett
10/04/2000 09:26 AM

To:   Jason.Peters@enron.com @ INTERNET
cc:
Subject:  ISDA Negotiation

Per my voice mail message.
---------------------- Forwarded by Maria R. Gelnett on 10/04/2000 09:28 AM
---------------------------

Maria R. Gelnett
08/02/2000 01:36 PM

To:   susan.bailey@enron.com
cc:   Janine Huber@nyseg.com
Subject:  ISDA Negotiation

Susan,
     Here is the proposed language:

Part 1(g) - fifth line, ...if any, and the combined net worth of the Party
and its Credit Support Provider is not materially diminished as a result
thereof,

Part 5 (b) -  (k) Commodity Options.  With respect to Transactions
involving commodity options, it is a producer, processor or commercial user
of, or merchant handling, the commodity which is the subject of the
commodity option Transaction, or the products or byproducts thereof, and
that it enters into the commodity option Transaction solely for purposes
related to its business as such.

Part 6 (f) - (i)  "Negotiated Fallback", provided that references to the
fifth Business Day shall be to the first Business Day;
       (ii)  "Fallback Reference Price";
      (iii)  "No Fault Termination".

Here is NYSEG's original version of the Master and CSA.  It does not need
to be considered at this point of negotiation.

(See attached file: MSTRnyseg0600.DOC)(See attached file:
CREDITnyseg0600r.DOC)

p.s.  They originally were sent  email to Marie Heard on 3/23/00.

Please contact me to set up a time for our Attorney's to discuss
arbitration.
Thank You.

Maria Gelnett

 - MSTRnyseg0600.DOC
 - CREDITnyseg0600r.DOC


Start Date: 1/14/02; HourAhead hour: 18;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002011418.txt


All:  Please review for content.  This deal has been recast as a "Price
Return Swap" and I hope it is self-explanatory (i.e., you won't have to drag
out the 1996 Equity Definitions).  I will forward a draft letter shortly.


Although I am still waiting for another Brazilian visa, I would like to pose
several potential dates to meet with you regarding Enron North America Corp.
trading issues.  I am presently considering several time periods:

  September 9,10, 12-17,19-24

Obviously, I can be available at any time during the month of Septermber as
well as future months.  But I would like to get started as soon as possible.

If you could kindly e-mail or call me (713/853-5620), I can elaborate
further.  Thank you.  Sara


Jeff,

I enjoyed visiting with you, Lou, and Greg last week.
I haven't heard anything back, and so wanted to check
in to see if it's appropriate to schedule a follow up
phone call.  I am leaving for Europe on June 30 and
will be gone for 10 days, so hoped to hear something
before then.  Thanks.

Chad
801-556-8490

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/


February 2 the registered voters of League City will be asked to vote on
the swimming pool issue.  Thursday, February 10 the city will hold a public
hearing at Creekside Intermediate School at 6:30 pm.  This meeting will be a
great chance for everyone to ask their questions and hear the answers
first-hand.  I know that there are very strong  opinions on this issue and I
like to be informed before I vote. If you have not been following the
newspaper coverrage, I have included several articles for you to skim.

Mary G. Strickland
 League City to start hearings on center

            By: JENNIFER THOMAS, Citizen Staff December 26, 2001

      Three public hearings have been scheduled to discuss the League City
Community Center referendum that's up for voter approval in a special
election on Feb. 2.

      Voters will be asked to approve a $12.8 million community center,
equipped with an indoor competitive pool, outdoor recreational pool, weight
room, gymnasium and other amenities.
      Ian Powell of SHW Group, Inc., the architectural engineering firm
designing the facility, will be conducting the hearings, along with
representatives from the League City Parks Department.
      The first hearing is scheduled for Wednesday, Jan. 2, at the Clear
Creek High School Ninth Grade Center, located at 2451 E. Main St., at 6:30
p.m.
      The second hearing will be Thursday, Jan. 10 at Creekside Intermediate
School, 4320 E. Main St., at 6:30 p.m.
      The last hearing will be held at the Johnny Arolfo Civic Center,
located on Walker, just next to City Hall, Tuesday, Jan. 29, at 6 p.m.
      The community center is the second phase of a project that started with
the construction of the Sportsplex.
      Two sites are under consideration for the proposed community center;
the land across from City Hall, and Walter Hall Park off FM 270.
      Funding for construction of the community center will come from the 1/4
cent sales tax that was passed to help pay for the construction of the
Sportsplex, from Certificates of Obligation, and from the city's General
Fund.
      Membership fees, user fees, and rental costs will pay for operations
and maintenance.

      ?Clear Lake Citizen 2002
Subj:   Pool Meeting and Vote
Date:   1/6/2002 8:56:24 PM Central Standard Time
From:   CCVEVENTS
To: CCVEVENTS

Questions abound about community center

By Alicia Gooden
The Daily News

Published January 04, 2002

If the public's overall impression of the first public hearing on a proposed
community center is indicative of the February vote, the measure might face
an uphill battle.

"I think it lacked sufficient information to have a good, reasonable vote on
the issue," said J.A. Willhern, a League City resident.

A good portion of the small, vocal group that showed up Thursday night for
the hearing sent an overt message to city leaders - too many questions, not
enough answers.

From the onset of the meeting, Mayor Tommy Frankovich asked that the hearing
be one that set aside personal and political stances on the $12.8 million
project. By the end of the hearing, it was evident that the Feb. 2 election
would come down to which wheel squeaked the loudest.

Most of the comments made during the 90-minute hearing dealt with how the
project would be funded, who would use the facilities, where the community
center would be built and how much financial burden League City residents
would be asked to shoulder.

Residents like Fred Lawrence, Karl Silverman and Elaine Kosty hurled
questions at City Administrator Nick Finan and project consultant Ian Powell
about the specifics of the project. The questions probed how realistic the
city's estimation was that the yearly maintenance costs for the 64,000
square-foot center would cost just $825,000.

The total estimated cost of the project is $12.8 million. Of that amount,
$9.4 million in certificate of obligation would have to be sold. Other
funding sources would come from property taxes, 4B sales taxes and any grants
the city could secure.

Also asked of city leaders was how much more out-of-area swim teams would be
charged as compared to those aquatic teams inside the city and how much the
listed additions such as a child care center and second gymnasium would cost.
A shared concern among many who do not support the project or are undecided
is that the center is really for the swim teams, many of which are outside of
League City and Galveston County.

Throughout the questioning, however, Finan and other city officials remained
poised.

Yet, some of the queries posed stumped city officials. Those in attendance
wanted to know how much of the $825,000 included salaries and benefits for
the staff needed to run the community center and how many people would be on
staff.

Though city officials said they had the information, it was not available at
the meeting, a point that many commented on afterward.

"How can you have a public hearing and not have the information the public
wants?" asked resident Jeff Mallios.

But the criticisms and negative intonations were buoyed somewhat by Teresa
Toungate, a parent with the swim team League City Barracudas.

Toungate, to applause from park board members and those in support of the
project, told the crowd that the community center would bring an influx of
economic development to the city.

"There are more than 1,000 families that come to these competitions
sometimes," she said. "These families are going to eat at our McDonald's,
Esteban's (a local restaurant) and spend money at our little stores."

One of those expressing concern over the cost of the project said that League
City had no major retailers, only "little stores" to help offset the cost of
the community center, which will feature a 50-meter, Olympic-size swimming
pool.

A chance to dive into the issue

By Stephen Hadley
The Daily News

Published January 03, 2002

There's something about a swimming pool that stirs the proverbial political
pot in a community.

In League City, there is a plan to build a $9.4 million community center that
includes an Olympic-size swimming pool and meeting rooms. The hitch is that
voters have to approve the proposal before it becomes reality. They'll head
to the polls on Feb. 2.

But before they do, the city plans to address questions and concerns about
the project during three public hearings. The first is tonight.

Some of the questions city leaders should answer concern where the proposed
center is going to be built and how much it's going to cost to use it.

Opponents of the deal have voiced both concerns.

Experts hired by the city say the center should be built closer to city hall,
not on county-owned land at Walter Hall Park as is now planned. Some
opponents have questioned whether the center would pose an environmental
threat to Clear Creek if it were built at the park. That's a dialogue city
leaders should have with citizens starting at tonight's meeting.

Is Walter Hall Park the best site for a community center? The intent of
putting it there was so that it would be centrally located, accessible to
residents in League City and people who live in the burgeoning Clear Lake
area.

How much it will cost to use the center has been a point of contention from
the project's infancy. Even the county commissioners, when they agreed to
allow the city to use the park for the center, questioned whether the cost -
$450 a year for a family of four or $2 a day to use the pool - was too much.
They worried whether those who can't afford such rates would be kept from
using a public pool. That's another legitimate question city leaders should
answer tonight.

If the early campaigning is any indication, there probably will be many more
questions this evening.

If you care about the issue, this is one hearing not to miss.

Center election divides community

By Alicia Gooden
The Daily News

Published January 06, 2002

LEAGUE CITY - In three weeks, voters will head to the polls to decide whether
to build a $12.8 million community center in the city.

Supporters say the center could be a tool for economic development, a nucleus
for the League City community and the magnet that attracts national
cheerleading and swimming competitions.

Those who oppose the project say that the city is trying to force all of
League City's residents to pay for a multi-million center that would be used
by a select few, most notably the area's swim leagues

If Thursday's public hearing was any indication, residents are divided over
the project and have plenty of questions.

Whether the measure passes or fails on Feb. 2 could largely hinge on how well
city officials explain the details of paying for the center and just who will
be footing that bill.

Paying the Piper

The cost of the 64,000 square-foot building, which will include an
Olympic-size swimming pool and several meeting rooms, is estimated to be
$12.8 million.

The city has secured $2 million for the project. The rest of the money will
come from the issuance of $9.4 million in certificates of obligation. The
original bond amount was $7.6 million but had to be raised to $9.4 million in
order to cover building costs.

Taxpayers will pay for the maintenance and operations cost of the center in
its first three years through revenue from the general fund, which includes
property taxes, franchise fees and possibly an increase in sales tax revenue
from the 4B Corporation.

The city estimates that the center would generate $850,000 a year in revenue
after three years. Its forecast for the actual expenditures after the three
years is $825,000. Earlier figures showed that the cost of operations would
run between $850,000 to $900,000.

But City Administrator Nick Finan said that after staff members took a harder
look at the numbers, the city was able to find ways to scale back costs by
hiring contract custodial labor as opposed to paid labor.

If the community center gets a green light from voters, the facility will
have a staff of 12 full-time employees and 18 part-time. Their salaries,
which Finan said are included in the $825,000 operations cost, would total
$375,000 a year.

"If we can meet our expectations, then we expect for our revenues to be more
than our expenditures," he said.

But if the city does not meet its expectations, Finan said that city council
will have to decide how to handle the shortfall.

"At that time maybe the operations of the facility will be scaled back," he
said. "There are a myriad of ways that can be addressed."

After the third year, the city anticipates that the center will have between
1,200 and 1,500 full and partial memberships at an estimated yearly cost of
$450 to $275 for aquatics memberships. Fees alone after the third year are
projected to generate $550,000 in revenue.

The certicates on the community center would last 20 years, said Finan. The
payments on the bond note would be $750,000 a year. The city's current
general fund debt is $28.6 million.

The life of the pool is expected to be 25 years to 30 years because it is
indoors and located in the southern part of the country. Finan said if the
referendum should pass, the city would initiate the first issuance of
certificates this summer.

Spreading the Word

Teresa Toungate and the other members of the League City Barracudas swim team
showcased a banner that urged residents to vote for the proposed community
center during the city's holiday parade in December.

The group will soon begin work on fliers and letters sent to other swim teams
asking them to become vocal supporters of the project.

"The way I see it, we have access to 500 people through the swim teams and if
each one of those people tells a friend and then goes to the polls we'll have
one of the larger turnouts that League City has seen in a long time," she
said.

The way people like J.A. Willhern see it, there's a lot more the city needs
to get nailed down before he votes for the project. Shiny brochures and
colorful artist renderings aren't enough.

"You (the city) want us to give you a blank check," he said to city officials
at Thursday's first public hearing on the community center.

The city has not set fees for the center. It has only estimated the amount
the center would need to one day be self-sustaining.

That move would have been political, said Mayor Tommy Frankovich.

"We could make it look nice in order to get the issue passed and play around
with numbers just to get it," he said. "That's why we kept the numbers
general."

Frankovich said that future council would set the fees for the community
center if the referendum passes.

The ballot language for Proposition 1 is simple. It asks only whether
residents would or would not support a community center to be built in the
city.

It says nothing of the cost of the facility and how it would be financed.
There was no legal requirement to do so, said Finan. The referendum also does
not tell voters that the measure is binding.

As vehemently as Toungate is about supporting the project, opponents of the
community center are working to kill the deal. They're asking questions,
requesting information and telling those they come in contact with their
opinions.

"No, I will not support it," said League City resident Fred Lawrence. "Right
now, I don't have enough information and I think the information that the
city is giving us is bad for the vote."

At the top of his concern list is why the city hasn't decided on where to
build the community center. Two options exist - the 5.4 acres the county
agreed to let the city lease in Walter Hall Park or the Arolfo site on 25
acres of land adjacent to city hall.

Project consultants said geo-technical studies show the Arolfo site would be
better suited for what the city wants to build.

"They don't know what they want but they want the voters to make a decision,"
said Elaine Kosty, a former council member.

Opponents contend the project is a gift to the numerous area swim teams. They
said that if the swim teams want the facility, the city should make them pay
for it.

Conversely, many of the community center supporters say that the swimming
pool was promised to them during the 1994 quarter-cent sales tax election.
Revenue from that sales tax initiative was used to build the Sportsplex.

But Toungate said that the community center dialogue has been narrowed to
focus in on only the swimming pool, a portion of the project that the swim
teams have tried to shy away from.

"We understand that that's an ugly issue," she said. "But the focus should be
on the benefit the community center brings to the entire community."

The swim teams were told upfront, said Toungate, that they would have to pay
for the first-class facility if they wanted it. She said that her team has
decided that it would pay what was necessary to be able to use the facility.

"We're not asking for any free rides or for the city to cut us any special
deals," she said.

The city estimates that teams will be charged $25 an hour for use of the
facility and that up to three teams can use the 50-meter pool at one time.

Toungate said she understands the concerns of older residents and what impact
the community center might have on some of them.

"I understand that older people are not going to use the pool but by the same
token I'm not going to use the senior citizen room," she said.

Winner and Losers

Who will ultimately benefit from the center if it is built is debatable. The
city would have a top-notch facility, the only one in the area with an indoor
pool capable of attracting state and national swim meets. It could also have
the pull to get state and national cheerleading competitions in town,
supporters say.

Economic development would benefit, said Finan.

Toungate and other supporters said such athletic meets attract thousands of
people.

"These people will come to our city and spend their money in our city," said
Toungate.

These same people could also cause overflow parking problems in the city,
Lawrence.

Close to 400 parking spaces will be needed to accommodate a building the size
of the proposed community center.

"We don't have the restaurants to feed these thousands of people," said
Lawrence. "They're going to go down to Clear Lake and NASA Road 1."

If the center is built, the city says that according to financial forecasts,
taxes would not have to be raised to support the facility.

But if the city does not make its goal of getting the 1,200 to 1,500
memberships, the costs of running the facility could continue to come from
the general fund or the operations might have to be scaled down, said Finan.

That bothers Lawrence.

"I just don't like the way the whole thing was set up," he said.

Toungate is bothered that the project has been viewed so negatively.

"People love to dwell on the negative," she said. "Look at the whole picture.
This center will benefit every age and resident from little children to
senior citizens. That's something positive for the city."


Hey fucko, give me a call.  You should come to NYC this weekend and party
with your friends.


hey sue,

glad to hear you enjoyed the trip to tennessee. it sounds extremely
relaxing. you don't sound too certain about the job in seattle. are
you not thrilled about it? if not but you really want to be in seattle,
maybe you could take it on the hope that you may find something
better in a couple of months. have you been thinking about the
possibility of tennessee? have you been looking for jobs outside of
the energy industry?

$350 is great. i told my mom to be expecting you to drop by. if
shes not there you can tape it to the back door. also, my mom
said you dropped off the vacuum cleaner... thanks so much.

gotta run, but i will be in touch. keep me posted on all your
decisions.

Lisa


I guess we wont see each other until tomorrow   :(

love you...

-----Original Message-----
From: Clint.Dean@enron.com [mailto:Clint.Dean@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2000 9:54 AM
To: Jennifer.K.Dickinson@usa.conoco.com
Subject:

I just found out that I have a meeting today from 5-6.  It is the one I
that was supposed to be tomorrow.  Let me know what you want to do.

Love you,
Clint


It's been a few years since I reviewed the case law on this.  Perhaps you
should write a memo reviewing the FERC cases on this issue and if necessary,
go talk to FERC about whether an RFP will be sufficient to set a just and
reasonable rate.  Is that okay with you Jim?  Ron - how much would that cost?

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Ronald Carroll" <rcarroll@bracepatt.com>
03/14/2001 01:10 PM

To: "Jeffrey Watkiss" <dwatkiss@bracepatt.com>, <gfergus@brobeck.com>,
<jsteffe@enron.com>, <rsanders@enron.com>, <sbishop@gibbs-bruns.com>
cc: <mary.hain@enron.com>, <smara@enron.com>
Subject: FERC Jurisdiction Over California Investigations

Richard:  In connection with EPMI's contention in the various California
litigations that they should be dismissed due to FERC's primary jurisdiction,
it strikes me that it may be helpful to lodge FERC's March 9, 2001 order with
the Court.  While FERC, in the 12/15 order, established its investigation,
the March 9 order makes findings and imposes remedies (fortunately not
against us).  This should enhance the primary jurisdiction argument.  FERC's
intent to occupy the field could not be more clear.  Ron


1/15 -
curve val: we have scoped the curve val project and have discussed it with PwC.  I've talked to E&Y in general terms and have a meeting with them on this at 10 today.  We have also had initial discussions with the different risk groups about the holes in the curve construction & upload process and our deliverable for the end of today is a list of where the holes are and a plan to fill those holes.

We spent significant time with E&Y to go over the  make up of the DPR.

We are working with the different groups on the 12/31 DPR information.  So far, we have only had one request for it.  My gut feeling is that EIM & ENA are complete, but ECTRIC & EGM need a bit more time.  Chris should have a complete status ready for today.

Our systems are fixed (hooray!).  Yesterday we caught up on the Enovate and Bridgeline DPRs as well as spent significant time with IT to get the systems fixed.

Susie is still working on the SEC VAR for 10/31, 11/30, and will start 12/31 as soon as all of the information is available.  She has also started the net assets work.

Lastly, the whole group had CAS training so once we get access to the system we can start pulling info by counterparty.

Today our goals are:

Curve val - finalize memo (getting agreement from PwC, E&Y, and Enron estate), put listing of curve construction plan fwd, start determining what the different buckets of curves are and what tools are available to perform analysis

Field more E&Y DPR qus

Have a complete status report on the 12/31 DPR.

Prepare ongoing reporting (Enovate, Bridgeline etc).

I also hope to get some time to familarize myself with the CAS environment.

Regards

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Thapar, Raj
Sent:	Tuesday, January 15, 2002 8:38 AM
To:	Wilson, Shona
Cc:	Abel, Chris; Considine, Keith; Ayala, Susie; Trevino, Susan; Pearce, Barry; Apollo, Beth
Subject:	RE: priorities for today

Looks good.  Thx

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Wilson, Shona
Sent:	Tuesday, January 15, 2002 7:05 AM
To:	Thapar, Raj
Cc:	Abel, Chris; Considine, Keith; Ayala, Susie; Trevino, Susan; Pearce, Barry; Apollo, Beth
Subject:	priorities for today

Dear Raj,

To keep you up to date with what we are spending time on, here is what I would like to accomplish today:

Shona
letter for PwC re curve validation
work with Gary Peng re requirements for 12/31 SEC reporting
work with Susie on 11/30 Net asset reporting
get trained on CAS (for all group members)

Chris
start on booklets by talking to each risk group re timing of when they can get us info
work with risk groups to determine when they can get us 12/31 DPR info

Keith
Work on determining what system tools are available for curve vals

Susan
get Risktrac systems working again
catch up the Enovate & Bridgeline reporting

Susie
work on getting the revals for the merchant assets
work on net asset reporting by meeting risk & accounting groups to determine what needs to be done for 11/30 info

Thanks

Shona
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Thapar, Raj
Sent:	Monday, January 14, 2002 5:22 PM
To:	Wilson, Shona
Subject:	RE: E&Y Request

Thanks

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Wilson, Shona
Sent:	Monday, January 14, 2002 5:17 PM
To:	Thapar, Raj
Subject:	RE: E&Y Request

Let me get with the risk guys to discuss the timing on this.  I'll give you an update tomorrow.

Regards

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Thapar, Raj
Sent:	Monday, January 14, 2002 4:41 PM
To:	Albrecht, Kristin; Wilson, Shona; Puchot, Paul; Pearce, Barry; Funkhouser, Shanna
Subject:	E&Y Request

Guys:

Here is the spreadsheet with names of EWS lead persons name.  Please forward it to all the other people who would be working on different pieces of it so that they can start working on this asap.

Thx

Raj
 << File: Info Request_Ene_Jan 11_021.xls >>


We are pleased to announce that the Center for Research in Regulated
Industries will be hosting another research seminar on Public Utilities.
These seminars are  held annually.  The papers are published every two
years as a book.  Although the subject matter may be technical,
presentations at the Seminars are designed for a general audience of
professionals and regulators.
Another Research Seminar will be held in May 3, 2002.  This year's seminar
will be held at Engelhard Hall, Rutgers Newark on October 26.

There is no charge for full-time academics, government employees, and
employees of sponsoring organizations.

More information about the Research Seminar is available at:
http://www.rci.rutgers.edu/~crri/RS.htm

For directions to Engelhard Hall, Rutgers Newark please go to:
http://www.rutgers.edu/kiosk/findplaces.shtml

Please see Calls for Papers for  Center's two Advanced Workshop and
Regulation and Competition Conferences and its Postal Conference.  More
information about the Call for Papers is available at
http://www.rci.rutgers.edu/~crri/Call.htm

If you do not wish to recieve further news or event listings from the
Center please reply with "REMOVE" in the subject heading.

Sincerely,

Jeremy T. Guenter
Administrative Assistant

***************************************************
Center for Research in Regulated Industries
Rutgers University - Graduate School of Management
180 University Avenue, Room 200P
Newark, NJ 07102-1897
phone: 973-353-5761; fax: 973-353-1348
http://www.rci.rutgers.edu/~crri
crri@andromeda.rutgers.edu <mailto:crri@andromeda.rutgers.edu>
****************************************************


Happy Monday - or whenever it is that you are blessed with the receipt of
this message. A funny thing happened to me on my way to upload the PX deals
on Friday. I went to process the data and was rudely stopped by an error
message stating the following:

Error establishing lock on Trader ID and Trader Date: Trader Already Locked
(_InboxAC11AC92.913Aoc376A1622250.4)

Interesting, isn't it? So I entered the PX deals manually and went along my
merry way. Just thought you should know.


I have no idea how the contracts are being handled.  If he is that unhappy he should talk to Billy Lemmons (the associate HR rep).

Stacey

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Postlethwaite, John
Sent:	Tuesday, December 04, 2001 11:55 AM
To:	White, Stacey W.
Subject:	RE: One unhappy person

Not sure, I think it is just a one year contract.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	White, Stacey W.
Sent:	Tuesday, December 04, 2001 9:54 AM
To:	Postlethwaite, John
Subject:	RE: One unhappy person

He would definitely be going to clean-up if we start the new company.  If we do not start the new company he would be the first person laid off.  What kind of contract is he under?

Stacey

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Postlethwaite, John
Sent:	Tuesday, December 04, 2001 10:58 AM
To:	White, Stacey W.
Subject:	One unhappy person

Stacey wanted to let you know that myself and the rest of the group feel and know that Nick does not want to be here. You could tell during the conference call yesterday with you that he was somewhat disappointed that he was not laid off. He has other avenues that I think he wants to pursue. Wanted to know if we have any recourse on this since he under contract right now. I have not approached him about it but have been tempted to just so he will get his act together. Here is a person who would rather be laid off than continue to work while people have been laid off who do not want to leave. It has rubbed some people the wrong way.

We are overstaffed currently and we would not lose a step with one less person.

Let me know your thoughts,

John


thanks
m


Just wanted to let you know that I joined the ECC and so I get their
messages  know.  Thanks for keeping me in the loop.
Ben


Wayne,

Do you have this contract defined as a HUB contract? I thought that we showed this as a FTS-1 HUB agreement. Please let me know. Also don't you have  specific hard coding tied to the HUB contracts?

Thanks Ramona

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lee, Dennis
Sent:	Monday, March 18, 2002 12:56 PM
To:	Donoho, Lindy; Betancourt, Ramona
Cc:	Lee, Dennis
Subject:	CR 24954

Should Cr 24954 (The Northwest Capacity in the Hub) be and FTS-1 contract or should it be an Administrative contract?

It is currently set up as an FTS-1.

Please advise...

Dennis P. Lee
ETS
Gas Logistics
(713) 853-1715
dennis.lee@enron.com


see bankruptcy reform update

Lisa J. Mellencamp
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith St.
Houston, TX  77002
Tel:  (713) 853-7986
Fax: (713) 646-3393
E-mail:  Lisa.Mellencamp@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Lisa Mellencamp/HOU/ECT on 12/13/2000 09:47 AM -----

	"William Rochelle" <wrochelle@fulbright.com>
	12/13/2000 09:08 AM

		 To: undisclosed-recipients:;
		 cc:
		 Subject: Fulbright Daily Bankruptcy News

FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI L.L.P.
DAILY BANKRUPTCY NEWS

From: Wm. J. Rochelle, III
           Fulbright - New York

Wednesday, December 13, 2000

Filings:

 Flashcom Inc., a high speed internet reseller, filed chapter 11 on Friday in
Santa Ana, Calif., and laid off one third of its workers.

 Golden West Tacos, Inc., the franchisee of 49 Taco Bell restaurants, filed
chapter 11 last month in San Diego.

Updates:

 Unicapital Corp., the Miami based aircraft and equipment lessor that filed
on Monday in New York, classifies as *significant* chapter 11 case.  The
company has almost $650 million in two bank facilities and closed two
securitizations in the last year for another $650 million.  See F&J Daily
Bankr. News of Dec. 12.

 Lernout & Hauspie has decided to appeal last weeks decision from the
Belgian court which denied the companys petition for protection from
creditors on the ground that the *measures for restructuring were totally
unsatisfactory.*  To complicate matters, the Belgian court has granted a
shareholders request that prevents L&H from selling or pledging assets.  The
company also is in chapter 11 in Delaware, but the U.S. court does not have
power to prevent a European creditor from filing a lawsuit in Europe if the
creditor has no presence in the U.S.  Also, L&H may be faced with conflicting
court orders: the Belgian court precludes pledging assets although the U.S.
court might authorize secured borrowing.  See F&J Daily Bankr. News of May 30
and Oct. 6 & 8 of 97 and Oct. 27, Nov. 28 & 30 and Dec. 1, 4 & 8 of 00.
 Scour Inc. a/k/a scour.com, whose web site allowed users to exchange video
and audio files, filed chapter 11 in October and auctioned its assets
yesterday for $5.5 million cash and $3.5 million in stock of the winning
bidder CenterSpan Communications Corp.  Scour has only $4 million in debt but
is facing $250 billion (no typo) in copyright infringement claims. The bidder
agreed not to use the assets in a manner that could bring more litigation.
See F&J Daily Bankr. News of Oct. 13 and Nov. 2 & 20.

Downgrades:
 W.R. Grace & Co. is the latest asbestos defendant to lose investment grade
status.  Yesterday S&P lowered the corporate peg to BB+.  Graces stock
plunged 20% yesterday and is down 85% in the last year.  A $250 million bank
credit matures in May and a second bank line is tapped out.  Stay tuned!  See
F&J Daily Bankr. News of Oct. 9.

 MC Shipping Inc., a 21 vessel ship owner, tripled in size recently and now
has been downgraded three time in the last eighteen months by S&P, which
yesterday dropped the long term rating by another notch to a dangerous CCC.
The corporate peg remains at B-.  The company is tendering for bonds at 54%
of face.  See F&J Daily Bankr. News of June 10 of 99 and April 7 of 00.

 S&P downgraded Dade Behring Inc. eighteen months ago and took another swipe
at the company yesterday, lowering the corporate and sub ratings by a notch
to B and a troubling CCC+.  The maker of medical diagnostic equipment and
supplies has $1.5 billion in rated debt.  S&Ps new ratings are one notch
below the downgrade that Moodys handed out in October.  See F&J Daily Bankr.
News of June 29 of 99 and Oct. 24 of 00.

Bankruptcy reform update:

 In an editorial today, The New York Times said that the bankruptcy reform
bill is  *distorted* and a *handout to the credit card industry.*  The
Hartford Courant today urged the President to veto the bill.  Other
newspapers have advocated Presidential approval of the bill.

Latin America news:

 For the second time in a week, the Peruvian government has taken over a
bank.  An insurance company also was taken over, and a Peruvian airline
suspended domestic service.

Asia news:

 Asian markets were pleased that the U.S. may now know who its president is.
However, the Japanese yen dropped to a 16 month low against the dollar, to
the pleasure of Japanese exporters.  Consumer prices in Tokyo have fallen
1.2% from one year ago, reflecting how Japans problem is deflation, not
inflation.

Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P. makes NO WARRANTIES OR REPRESENTATIONS OF ANY
SORT with respect to this report, including any warranties or representations
as to the accuracy or completeness of any of the information, facts, or
opinions contained herein.  By having requested receipt of these reports, the
recipient acknowledges that the receipt of these reports does not constitute
the receipt of legal advice and does not, by itself, establish an
attorney-client relationship.  These reports are provided as a courtesy
solely for the recipients information and may not be reproduced or
distributed to any third parties without Fulbrights express written
authorization.
 - bknews.wpd


================================================================
As requested, your News Alert for TXN
follows from EquityAlert.com.
To edit/discontinue your alerts please refer to end of message.
PLEASE REVIEW THE NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER BELOW
================================================================

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-= Paid Advertisement -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Probex Successfully Closes on $12.5 Million Financing

Probex Corp. (AMEX: PRB) Financing to assist in continuing
engineering and development work leading up to construction of
Wellsville, OH, reprocessing facility.  Groundbreaking set for
first quarter 2001.  Probex - New, patented, unparalleled, highly
economic and environmentally beneficial motor oil reprocessing
technology.

For more information, click:
http://205.210.134.51/a1.asp?ID=1261aa

AOL USERS: copy & paste the link above into your browser.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Precision Dynamics' Smart Band(TM) RFID Wristbands Use Tag-it(TM) Smart
Label Inlays from Texas Instruments

SAN FERNANDO, Calif. and DALLAS, Dec 13, 2000 /PRNewswire via COMTEX/ --
Precision Dynamics Corporation, an international leader in identification
products, announced a new line of identification wristbands, Smart Band(TM),
that incorporates Tag-it(TM) smart label inlays from Texas Instruments Radio
Frequency Identification (RFID) Systems. Using TI's RFID smart label
technology,
Smart Band provides advanced data storage and a more accurate and secure
method
of identifying and tracking hospital patients, prison inmates, and patrons at
entertainment and recreation facilities.

Tag-it smart label inlays are an easy-to-integrate, cost-effective and
consumable RFID solution. Consisting of an integrated circuit, an antenna and
requiring no batteries, Tag-it RFID inlays are paper-thin, flexible and
programmable. The programmable feature of Tag-it allows application-specific
information to be written to and retrieved from the tags at any time. In
addition to providing a unique identification number, Precision Dynamics Smart
Band can contain data on the location of hospital patients or prison inmates.
These could also hold information on the status of an inmate's commissary
account or automatically debit a patron's account each time a purchase is made
at a theme park, vacation resort or other attraction. Information on the RFID
Smart Band can be changed or locked to protect it from being modified.

Smart Band can be read by handheld RFID scanners, or by fixed-position readers
installed in an entryway or other access point in the facility. The technology
allows users to seamlessly transfer information from its computer systems to
the
Smart Band, or vice versa, potentially eliminating human transcription errors.
The Smart Band can also be positively linked to digital photographs in a
database to help ensure more accurate processing of patients, inmates and
patrons.

"Smart wristbands, using TI's RFID technology, are a more accurate and secure
method of identification that will improve business operations in numerous
environments," said Jim Bensman, Market Development Manager of Precision
Dynamics.

Precision Dynamics Corporation has developed three Smart Band solutions
designed
for specific markets that use TI's Tag-it smart label technology: 1) Sentry
Smart Band, 2) Clincher Smart Band and 3) Visa Smart Band. The Smart Band
family
of products combine RFID and bar coding technology making them compatible with
existing computer systems.

1. The Sentry(R) Smart Band(TM) - Hospitals/Healthcare Facilities
Upon admission, an RFID smart label containing the patient's data is
printed on demand and applied to the Sentry Smart Band.  Benefits
include:

-- Allows patients to be accurately identified without being moved or
touched
-- Creates a permanent record which can be updated at any time
-- Instantly tracks a patient's location anywhere in the facility
-- Reduces erroneous procedures and medication

2. The Clincher(R) Smart Band(TM) - Law Enforcement/Corrections
The Clincher Smart Band can be used by police departments and
correctional facilities to properly identify and process inmates.  Upon
arrest, each inmate is assigned a Clincher Smart Band, which contains a
unique ID number and can also accommodate his or her photo.  Benefits
include:

-- Hands-free identification and tracking of inmates throughout the
facility
-- Facilitates electronic roll calls and location of patients on demand
-- Instant verification through a link to database of inmate photos
discourages wristband tampering and prevents erroneous releases
-- Can be configured to debit inmates' commissary accounts each time a
purchase is made

3. The Visa(R) Smart Band(TM)  - Recreation/Entertainment
The Visa Smart Band can be used by the recreational and entertainment
industry for access control at concerts, sporting events or amusement
parks.  Upon entering a facility, each patron is given a Visa Smart
Band with an RFID chip that is detected each time the individual passes
through one of the portals located in key locations throughout the
facility.  Benefits include:

-- Tracks the location of patrons as they pass electronic gateways
-- Electronically controls patrons' access to specific attractions
-- Debits patrons' account each time a purchase is made
-- Prevents fraud and unauthorized use of wristbands by linking photos and
patrons' accounts
-- Researches patrons' traffic patterns and activities cost-effectively

For more information on the Smart Band family of products, contact Precision
Dynamics Corporation at 800-847-0670 or view their web site at www.pdcorp.com.
For more information, contact TI RFID Systems at 1-888-937- 6536 or view their
web site at www.tiris.com.

Established in 1956, Precision Dynamics Corporation is an international leader
in identification for the healthcare, recreation/entertainment and
correctional
industries. Located in San Fernando, California, Precision Dynamics provides
quality, innovative identification products using RFID, bar coding and thermal
technology.

Texas Instruments Incorporated is the world leader in digital signal
processing
and analog technologies, the semiconductor engines of the Internet age. The
company's businesses also include sensors and controls, and educational and
productivity solutions. TI is headquartered in Dallas, Texas and has
manufacturing or sales operations in more than 25 countries. Texas Instruments
is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol TXN (NYSE: TXN).
More
information is located on the World Wide Web at www.ti.com.

Texas Instruments Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) Systems is a leading
developer and manufacturer of field-proven (RFID) solutions used in a broad
range of applications worldwide. TI became the first multi-national
semiconductor company to market RFID Systems with the introduction of TIRIS
(Texas Instruments Registration and Identification System) in 1991. For more
information call 1-888-937-6536 or visit the TI RFID Web site at
www.tiris.com.

SOURCE Texas Instruments

CONTACT:          Susy d'Hont of Texas Instruments, 972-575-2451,
sdhont@ti.com;
or Trish Ostroski of Precision Dynamics Corp., 818-897-1111, ext. 1332,
trisho@pdcorp.com

URL:              http://www.ti.com
http://www.pdcorp.com
http://www.prnewswire.com

(C) 2000 PR Newswire.  All rights reserved.

-0-

KEYWORD:          California
Texas
INDUSTRY KEYWORD: CPR

****************** TO EDIT YOUR EQUITY ALERTS ********************
To unsubscribe or edit your alerts, visit
http://www.equityalert.com/alerts.asp?uid=alewis34&xid=40352
******************************************************************

***IMPORTANT NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER REGARDING THIS COURTESY EMAIL**
At your request, as a subscriber to our service, this email alert
is being sent to you as a courtesy and is for information purposes
only.  We are a financial news re-distributor.  We are not an
investment advisory and do not purport to tell or suggest which
companies you should monitor or which securities you should
purchase or sell.
In addition to the information regarding the company you are
monitoring (the &Monitored Company8), this email contains an
advertisement describing a product, service or company for which we
received a fee, at our normal advertising rates of $55 per 1,000 e-
mails (subject to volume and other discounts), from the advertising
company.  In addition, not withstanding our policy of prohibiting
employees from buying or selling securities of an advertising
company for a period of 20 days following dissemination of the
advertisement, we may not be able to effectively monitor our
employees to ensure compliance with the same. Consequently, there
may be sales and/or purchases of such securities by our employees
prior to, during and immediately following the dissemination of the
advertisement.
Please note that (1) this email may not contain the full text of
the press release issued by, or the research or other reports
regarding, the Monitored Company; and (2) the text of the
advertisement, the press release and/or reports were obtained from
third party sources and were not written, generated or edited by
us; accordingly, we make no representations or give any assurance
as to the accuracy or completeness, nor have we conducted any
independent investigations of, the disclosures regarding the
subject matter of such releases and reports.
Please note that links to the advertising company and/or Monitored
Company are provided for your convenience.  We assume no obligation
for the content of such sites.
All information contained herein should be independently verified
by you with the advertising company or with Monitored Company or
any other sources you prefer.
[THIS IS ONLY A SUMMARY OF, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO, THE &EQUITYALERT SUBSCRIBER AGREEMENT AND
DISCLAIMER.8 PLEASE VISIT
http://www.equityalert.com/home/disclaim.asp
FOR ACCESS TO OUR COMPLETE DISCLAIMER]
******************************************************************


Tana,

Finally, here is the deal you requested.

Thanks,
Joe


could you please forward me the gas daily story re: investigation into EOL.
I'm having a hard time locating.  Thanks, Jeff


-----Original Message-----
From: Starwood Preferred Guest [mailto:Starwood@spg.0mm.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 10:47 AM
To: DIANA
Subject: Enjoy 35% off resorts worldwide

 SPG Brands <http://image.0mm.com/38669/2001/1102-1/logobar_blue.gif>
Save 35% <http://spg.0mm.com/sta114058>
	at resorts & destinations worldwide <http://spg.0mm.com/sta114059>

Exclusively For Starwood Preferred Guests!
Enjoy 35% off some of the most desired resorts and destinations around the world...the Princeville in Hawaii...The Westin Regina Resort in Cancun...the Sheraton San Marcos Golf Resort in Arizona.
Experience the incredible savings, special offers and rewards.
Anytime. Anywhere(SM).

  <http://image.0mm.com/38669/2001/1102-1/princeville1.jpg>
 <http://spg.0mm.com/sta114060>	  <http://spg.0mm.com/sta114061>

When making your reservations by phone,
please call 1-877-STARWOOD.

  _____

If you would like to receive future promotional e-mails in text-only format, click here <http://spg.0mm.com/sta114062+diana_scholtes@enron.com>.

You are subscribed as: diana_scholtes@enron.com

If you would like your e-mail to be sent to a different address, please click here <http://spg.0mm.com/sta114063+diana_scholtes@enron.com>.

Click here <http://spg.0mm.com/sta114064> to review the Starwood Preferred Guest privacy statement.

Click here <http://spg.0mm.com/sta114065> to review the Starwood Preferred Guest program terms and conditions.

You have received this e-mail as a member of Starwood Preferred Guest. If you prefer not to receive future promotional e-mails from Starwood Preferred Guest, please click here <http://spg.0mm.com/sta114066+diana_scholtes@enron.com>. It may take up to 10 business days to completely remove you from our e-mail list and there is a slight chance that you may receive e-mail from us within that time.

  <http://secure.emailpub.com/sensor?image=3379&id=122713117>


Following please find the New EnronOnline Executive Summary. This summary
will be sent on a daily basis.

EnronOnline Executive Summary for 10/10/00
Transaction Summary
External Transactions Today	2,653
Average Daily External Transactions (30 day Trailing Avg)	2,430
Total Life to Date Transactions*	348,719

EnronOnline Percentage of Entity's Total Transactions for 	10/10/00
Enron North America	74%
Enron Europe Limited	45%
GLOBAL PRODUCTS	34%
Enron Metals	5%

Gross Notional Value of EnronOnline Transactions	Total
Today	1,522,925,449
MTD	180,208,140,010
LTD	181,421,382,127
Average Daily Notional Value (30 Day Trailing Avg)	1,587,091,791

Notional Revenue from Physical Flows to Date	12,866,453,407

Counterparties, Users, and Products Offered
Counterparties having transacted to date	506
New Counterparties transacting for the first time today	2
Number of Products Offered Today	1,235
Total Number of External Users Logged on Today	2,881
Average # of External Users logged on (30 day Trailing Avg)	2,458


I feel your stock rising already!

	Russell Diamond/ENRON@enronXgate
	05/31/2001 08:03 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marie Heard/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan
Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Ode to the Legal Lady's of Swap and a Sempra Energy Credit W/S

Dear Legal Lady's

I would like to further reinstate my status of favorite Credit Person, I know
as of late my status had been slipping and I must confess I have no one to
blame but myself.  I want you to know that after a lot of deep thought and
pondering of my potential status downgrade, I have resolved myself to pull
from deep inside and work to maintain my status.  Although my mates in credit
have provided some strong competition to remove me from favorite credit
status, I am here to tell you that I am committed 150% to remain as your
favorite credit person!!!!!

Yours Truly,
Russell

Now, that being said, my commitment is demonstrated by the submittance of the
Sempra Energy Solutions Credit Worksheet.

Thanks again,
Russell


I am a legal assistant for Jeff Hodge.  At his suggestion,  I am contacting
you concerning the possibility of spending time with you or a trader in your
area observing "the business"  during bid week if possible, in order that I
may gain experience and information concerning gas trading.  A few hours in
the morning or whenever is best for you.

Thanks for your help!

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


any interest?
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 03/02/2001 12:42 PM -----

	Rosalee Fleming
	03/02/2001 09:08 AM

		 To: Mark Metts/NA/Enron, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Enron Opportunity

Hi Mark and Steve -

Chad said he has sent this to quite a few people, so it might be overkill,
but thought I'd send to you.  He has sent to Jeff, Mike McConnell (who told
him he's forwarding to Dan Reck, who is in charge of the new freight
business), Lou Pai and Andrew Miles, Tom White and David Cox.
---------------------- Forwarded by Rosalee Fleming/Corp/Enron on 03/02/2001
08:28 AM ---------------------------

	Enron Energy Services

	From:  Chad Tipton @ EES                           03/01/2001 06:12 PM

To: Kenneth Lay/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Enron Opportunity

Ken,

My name is Chad Tipton.  I am currently a Development Support Manager with
EES in the Integrated Asset Management (IAM).   Recently, I  had the good
fortune to meet, Ron Hosmer.  He represents a company called IdleAire
Technologies, Inc..  IdleAire is a startup company started in 1999.
IdleAire has developed a system to eliminate truckdrivers from having to idle
their trucks while on long haul overnight stops.  Their plan is to electrify
truckstops and install remote HVAC units to eliminate truck idling.  Also,
these units provide cable TV and internet services.  They have already
piloted the technology in several truckstops in the Knoxville, TN area.

IdleAire's  goal is to:

"........evolve the nation's truck stops and travel centers into the largest
truck stop electrification network in the world. We are taking truck stop
electrification to the next level. Our travel center conversions provide
heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) at every parking space. We
also provide drivers in-cab telephone, Internet and television."

Idle Air has caught the attention of many interest groups in Washington,
D.C.  Ron tells me that they have already gained support from Tennessee
congressmen, including Jimmy Duncan and  Van Hilleary.   Also, former House
Speaker, Newt Gingrich is on the board of directors of IdleAire
Technologies.  These individuals support this technology because it reduces
emissions and helps state quality for CMAQ funds.

I had mentioned to Ron, that I worked for Enron and informed him about what
we do.  He and I both felt that Enron may be interested in developing a
strategic partnership to take their technology to market.   Ron said that
they are looking for a strategic partner with energy related experience and
the capital to invest in this project.

Enron would benefit in several ways:

1.  Greater than average returns.

2.  Increased publicity and recognition in Enron's environmental role.  (EPA
Energy Star Label, EPA Climate Protection Award, etc....)

3.  Increase markets for electricity and possibly gas.

4.  Maintain Enron's title of innovation leader.

5.  Open a whole new market for the energy services group. (EES)  Long term
maintenance contract, commodities, etc....

6.  Open a new market for the broadband services group. (EBS)  Videos on
demand.

I believe this opportunity is very synergistic with Enron's business model.
If you would be interested in talking with Ron, I would be happy to introduce
him to you.  They have a  very comprehensive business plan that lays out
their business in detail.   I have arranged for him to provide us with an
executive summary of the business.  You can also find out more about the
company by visiting their website at:

www.idleaire.com

Thank you  for your time.

Chad Tipton
5-5310


Kam,

Could you please provide us with the calculations  and post IDs of the following books using the same criteria that you used for the Bankruptcy book:

	FT US CAN
	FT Canada
	FT Ontario (Canadian)
	FT Intra Ontario

I know that you may not run all these books, but could you help me find the applicable people so that we may obtain the same information that you provided to us on the Bankruptcy book.

Tiffany Miller
5-8485


Sorry missed this earlier - I'm in Chicago.  Comments on BE - probably too late .  Sorry

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Devries, Paul
Sent:	Wednesday, October 10, 2001 9:07 AM
To:	Kitchen, Louise
Subject:	RE: John Sherriff

Nothing we need right now.  Things he may need to know:
1.  Pleased with our relationship so far.  Looking forward to market opening.
2.  We are discussing a number of other possible transactions with them including:
Possible options (either our call or their put) for power from the Bruce A units 3&4.  They are attempting to bring these back on line.  This deal would help them ensure the economic viability of doing the refurbishment.  I believe these would not come back until fall 2003 at the earliest.
Short term deals for early next year after market opening
Possible purchase of green power from their wind units at the Bruce

We are also trying to work more closely with them on the lobbying front for market opening.  This may be something he should try to sniff out to see whether they really care if the market opens early next year or not.  The people over here seem to be talking the talk that they do.

Cheers, Paul D


okay another check  Deal  506239.01
crandall
Enron buys dynegy
mid c
1/29 only
we have 290.00 in system, bloomberg has price of 390.00

thanks
sp

   Kate Symes                01/26/2001 04:21 PM

To: Stephanie Piwetz/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: dEAL 506503.01

Broker is right - deal has been changed.

By the way, I checked out audit viewer on deal 505066, and it showed that I
had changed the deal from Amerex to APB yesterday afternoon. It didn't show
any other changed after that - so I've put a call into Duong Luu to figure
out why the change didn't save, or why it defaulted back. Just FYI.

Stephanie Piwetz   01/26/2001 02:25 PM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: dEAL 506503.01

 Kate,
Richter
please check 506503.01  Enron Sells SCEM/Mirant
we show sp-15 in system, Bloomberg has Np-15
25 mws    280.00     feb 2001

Thanks


It was such a treat to see you on Friday night and Saturday. Please let me
know if you want to get out again this week.  Lilly leaves on Sunday.
Lot's of love to you, Dona


Hi,
        go into EHRonline - just as you would to do your time sheets.
Above the area "TimeSheets (CATS)" - you can also click on above section
"Work Contacts" and/or "Personal Information".
And below topics also may have fields you can check
Selecting the topics - should open the screen/ fields in each section (with
red arrows to those we can update).

thanks,
Sandy


Great.  I'll be there.  Stop by, or call me at 415.505.6633, or 916.448.8240.

Best,
Jeff

-----Original Message-----
From: Boyd, Hap
Sent: Wed 9/12/2001 8:22 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Cc:
Subject: RE: for Board review and comment

Jeff,

My biggest concern is that we draw attantion to our QF contracts and there is pressure for us to give up our capacity payment or the CPUC futher dilutes our energy payment. I also don't think it makes sense to attack the large companies that have the DWR contracts. We generally end up working together on various issues and I do n't want to damage the relationships. I agree with many of the points John makes, but I don't want to be identified with the letter.

Enron Wind also needs to see an Edison MOU bill passed so we can get paid our past due amounts and get our five year fixed energy price on our ISO4 contracts. I plan to be in Sacramento the next couple of days and will stop by Governmental Advocates.

Regards,

Hap


atleast, why

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Wednesday, January 16, 2002 11:29 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

i don't take any funny pills.  it comes naturally!  did you age by 10 years over the holidays?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Wednesday, January 16, 2002 11:28 AM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

its those funny pills

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Wednesday, January 16, 2002 11:25 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

oh well in that case, we better go to dinner.  or were you talking about learning about the new company.  i am funny today aren't i

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Wednesday, January 16, 2002 11:20 AM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

i just want to stick around for a little while to see if i can learn anything

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Wednesday, January 16, 2002 11:12 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

why so late?  i know that you aren't working.  i am bored

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Wednesday, January 16, 2002 10:56 AM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

yep, around 12:30

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Wednesday, January 16, 2002 10:38 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:

are we going to lunch?  i don't want you to flake out on me again and i miss my workout time!  :)


Hello Mark,
Yes, it's that guy from Boston again.  This is my "every couple weeks, circle back with Enron to see if Mark has had a chance to contact the other groups he thinks might be interested in online contract negotiation" message.
Michael
P.S.  Did you see the quote from the California Asst AG who wants to personally escort your Chairman to jail?  I wonder what office he's running for!
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Hayes
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 10:52 AM
To: 'Mark.Taylor@enron.com'
Subject: RE: Follow Up
Vacations are my favorite reason for people not calling me back.  Hope you have a great time and that your cell phone never rings.
Talk to you at the end of May -
Michael
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark.Taylor@enron.com [mailto:Mark.Taylor@enron.com ]
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 7:22 PM
To: Michael.Hayes@Beachfire.com
Subject: Re: Follow Up
Sorry I haven't been able to respond.  I have been swamped trying to get
away for a vacation and in fact am leaving in the morning.  I will have to
get back to you when I return which will not be until the 22nd.


---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 10/17/2000 08:24 AM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Eric Bass                           10/17/2000 08:23 AM

To: Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT, Timothy Blanchard/HOU/EES@EES, Jeffrey C
Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kenneth Shulklapper/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nick
Hiemstra/HOU/ECT@ECT, Luis Mena/NA/Enron@Enron, Amir Ahanchian/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Brian Hoskins/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications
cc:
Subject: Game Tomorrow @ 7

Contrary to popular belief, the people that actually show up to the game do
have other things they can do if they know that the other team members will
not show up.  So, let me know whether or not you will be there.


Here are the next four descriptions.  Per Awais's message below, he is still
trying to get these by today.  I know it is a little late....let me know if
this will be an issue.  Please give me your comments so I can coordinate
responses.  Thanks!
---------------------- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 09/03/99 01:18 PM
---------------------------

Awais Omar
09/03/99 12:31 PM
To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: EnronOnline Market Descriptions

Sorry for the delay.

Here are the next four descriptions.

Only the three liquids one waiting now.

I have sent these to David Forster in our Project group to review first
before I send them to yourself.  If I don't get them back today I will send
them over the weekend so they are there for you on Monday.

Could you please send me comments back on all the other descriptions today.
Is your fax machine at your end OK?  It's just that the other fax you sent
came through a dark background making the comments a little hard to read.

My fax is 44 171 316 5420.

Awais

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Tana Jones                           01/09/99 23:13

To: Awais Omar/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: EnronOnline Market Descriptions

Awais,

I have forwarded the descriptions you have sent us thus far to the respective
Legal Trading Lawyers to sign off as far any legal issues we may have with
the descriptions.  I understand your deadline is the end of the week.

When can I expect the remaining descriptions?


COLUMBIA GAS TRANSMISSION CORPORATION
                        NOTICE TO ALL INTERESTED PARTIES
                                NOVEMBER 16, 2001

Notice ID: 3277
5 - NO RESPONSE REQUIRED

SUBJECT: CAPACITY ALLOCATION-TIMELY NOMINATION CYCLE FOR NOVEMBER 17-19, 2001

PLEASE NOTE THAT ALL ALLOCATIONS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE BASED ON THE RECEIPT OF
ANY NEW NOMINATIONS OR INTRADAY NOMINATIONS.

RECEIPTS:

ALLOCATIONS DUE TO LONG WALL MINING OF LINE SM-123:  For the following MLI
points: There is no capacity for IPP customers.  There is no capacity for ITS
customers.  There is no capacity for secondary firm customers.  There is no
capacity for overruns.

        Equitable Hi Hat       MLI F3
        KYWV Beaver Creek      MLI H1
        CNR Boldman            MLI CNR02
        CNR Conoway            MLI CNR03
        CNR Johns Creek        MLI CNR08
        CNR Canada             MLI CNR09, CNR10
        CNR Stafford           MLI CNR11
        CNR Thacker/Majestic   MLI CNR12
        CNR Briar Mtn.         MLI CNR13
        CNR Huff Creek         MLI CNR14
        Conoco Grant           MLI P1

KA-1 LINE (819288 AND 827280):  There is no capacity for IPP customers.  There
is no capacity for ITS customers.  There is no capacity for secondary firm
customers.

INTERNAL CONSTRAINT:

LANHAM:  There is no capacity for IPP customers.  There is no capacity for ITS
customers.  There is no capacity for secondary firm customers.

Excess MDWQ               Available +
ISS Withdrawals           Available
SIT Withdrawals           Available
Imbalance Drawdowns       Available

Excess MDIQ               NOT Available +
ISS Injections            NOT Available
SIT Injections            NOT Available
Imbalance Paybacks        NOT Available

PAL Lends/Unparks         Available
PAL Parks/Loan Paybacks   NOT Available

+ Call Gas Control 24 hours in advance at (304) 357-2606 to request approval.

Columbia Gas Transmission has completed allocating all of its receipt and
delivery points for the gas days of November 17-19, 2001.  You may now view the
quantities you are authorized to flow on November 17-19, 2001.  On the Internet
NAVIGATOR, view Nominations, Scheduled Quantity, Scheduled Quantity for Service
Requestor-Summary, Nominations to be Viewed, and select Reduced Nominations.
The quantities confirmed to flow for your account are available on the Internet
NAVIGATOR after 5:30 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, November 16, 2001.

If you have any questions, please contact your Account Representative.


Misti:
I assume you are responsible for publishing the management reports.  I cannot access these reports past May 11.  Have they been published since then and if so, any idea why I can't get them?


Vince

I will make sure you get on this distribution list.

Credit is going to be a big issue for energy companies and banks.

We may need to form additional discussion groups.

Volatility in energy prices and a general economic slowdown may cause an
increase in defaults.

Banks are primarily interested in regulatory impact on loan portfolio and
credit derivatives as a an alternative to raising capital or selling assets.

Energy companies could use credit derivatives to hedge or price credit
exposure.

Don Mumma(ex CSFB, MD Axiom Software)is organizing a survey of energy credit
practices. You can reach Don at 212-248-4188 ext 22.

Regards,

Philip Merrill
GARP Regional Director for New York
973-258-1540

-----Original Message-----
From: Gerber, Jeannette [mailto:jeannette.gerber@csfb.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2000 7:34 PM
To: 'garpny1@home.com'; Alev A Suer; Amit Srivastav; Andrew Ulmer; CFA
John P. Felletter; Claudia Cappelli; Francis Owusu; Gerber, Jeannette;
Joe Pimbley; Joseph C Carrozzo Jr; Lingja Zhang; Marian Trano-Lepisto;
Markus Buri; Maurizio Mondello; Nawal Roy; Sarnj. Dhanda; Yicheng Zhong;
'john.tierney@db.com'; 'tom_mansley@westlb.com'
Subject: GARP NY - Minutes of the Credit Derivatives Meeting - December
13 , 2000

Dear members of the credit derivatives group.

You've probably been wondering if I would ever get the minutes of last weeks
meeting out. Well, here they are and I sincerely apologize for the delay. I
always thought this time of year is supposed to be slow, but unfortunately,
the opposite has been the case.

Please pay particular attention to the action points. We can only handle
these meetings successfully if each and everyone of you actively
participates and plays a role! The next meeting can only be scheduled if
there is enough feedback available.

Wishing you happy holidays,

Regards,

Jeannette

CREDIT | FIRST
SUISSE | BOSTON
CRM Credit Exposure Management (New York)
> *: +1 (212) 325 9361
Fax: +1 (212) 743 2562

Minutes of the GARP NY Credit Derivatives Meeting - December 13,2000

The meeting was generously hosted by WestLB

Attendees:
Matthew Bianco
Claudia Cappelli
Joe Carrozzo
Jeannette Gerber
Tom Mansley
Philip Merrill
Joe Pimbley
Marian Trano-Lepisto

(due to some technical problems, not all attendees received the invitations
on time.)

Summary
The aim of this first meeting was to decide on topics, people involvement
and the format of future meetings.

Topics
The following topics were discussed for discussion in future meetings:
* New models and structures available
* practical work issues
* credit risk policy
* ISDA issues / documentation
* regulatory issues / BIS capital
* hedging issues (e.g. embedded options, rollover, funded vs unfunded,
etc.)
* electronic trading issues
* general technology issues and information on new systems available
* pricing differentials
* pricing sources
* current models used for pricing, VaR
* credit event monitoring
* counterparty suitability

Action: all members to check with credit derivatives colleagues within their
organization to go over the list and complete.
Action: all members to pick topics they could lead through (or they could
organize someone to lead through).

People Involved
The involvement will depend on the topic. A member of the group will lead
through a meeting, or organize a credit derivative professional to lead
through the meeting, depending on the topic.

Meeting Format
We expect a series of evening workshops to take place about every 6 weeks.
In order to get active discussions going, all participants are expected to
inquire within their own institutions as to how the particular subject under
discussion is being treated in-house. We feel that the meetings will only be
successful if all participants are actively involved in the process.

We expect most members to be able to host the meeting once a year. Please
let me know if and when you could host a meeting.

Action: all members to check if and when they can host a meeting.

The date and venue for the next meeting will be announced in early January,
depending on your feedback on the topics.

This message is for the named person's use only.  It may contain
confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information.  No
confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.
If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all
copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the
sender.  You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute,
print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended
recipient. CREDIT SUISSE GROUP and each of its subsidiaries each reserve
the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks.  Any
views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except
where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state
them to be the views of any such entity.
Unless otherwise stated, any pricing information given in this message is
indicative only, is subject to change and does not constitute an offer to
deal at any price quoted.
Any reference to the terms of executed transactions should be treated as
preliminary only and subject to our formal written confirmation.


was travelling all week.  would be happy to discuss this weekend, but i'd
need to be by phone, since i'll be in mendocino.  are the handouts from
thursday that i need to get?

Best,
Jeff

	Anil Sama <asama@yahoo.com>
	02/16/2001 12:55 PM

		 To: "Vavrek, Carolyn \(US - San Francisco\)" <cvavrek@deloitte.com>,
Guinney@haas.berkeley.edu, Jeff_Dasovich@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: FIA assignment

Jeff, Mark:

Wondering where you were yesterday. Hope you didn't
forget about the in-class quiz!

The next HW and writeup due next week seems like
a heavy one.
Do most of you have Monday off? I'll take a look at the
case/HW Sa/Su, and prefer a meeting / conf call anytime
Monday. Perhaps PM in the city if folks are working
that day? Sunday PM (after 7) works for me too.

-Anil

--- "Vavrek, Carolyn (US - San Francisco)"
<cvavrek@deloitte.com> wrote:
> Congrats crew - we got a 9 on case #2.
> When is everyone available between now and Wed pm to talk
> about case #3 and
> the other homework?
> - cv
>
> Carolyn M. Vavrek
> Manager - Human Capital Advisory Services
> Deloitte & Touche
> 50 Fremont Street
> San Francisco, CA  94105
>
> phone: 415-783-5137
> fax: 415-783-8760
> e-mail: cvavrek@deloitte.com
>
> - This message (including any attachments) contains
> confidential information
> intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is
> protected by law.  -
> If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete
> this message and
> are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or
> distribution of this
> message, or the taking of any action based on it, is
> strictly prohibited.
>

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35
a year!  http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/


Dear Sara,

Thanks again for your interest in our services.  In order to prepare a
retirement plan for you please send copies of statements from the various
financial institutions that currently hold your retirement assets.
I am ready to meet with you at your convenience to discuss your options and
to answer any questions.

Sincerely,
Don Blake

713-654-4714

PaineWebber Inc.
1111 Bagby
Ste 5100
Houston, TX 77002

Notice Regarding Entry of Orders and Instructions: Please
do not transmit orders and/or instructions regarding your
PaineWebber account(s) by e-mail. Orders and/or instructions
transmitted by e-mail will not be accepted by PaineWebber and
PaineWebber will not be responsible for carrying out such orders
and/or instructions.  Notice Regarding Privacy and Confidentiality:
PaineWebber reserves the right to monitor and review the content of
all e-mail communications sent and/or received by its employees.


Standard & Poor's Risk Solutions and Risk Data Bank to develop a scoring model for Japanese SME's

Standard & Poor's Risk Solutions today announced that it has formed a strategic alliance with The Risk Data Bank of Japan Limited (RDB), a leading provider of credit risk data, to jointly develop the first advanced scoring model to assess the creditworthiness of Japanese small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).

The advanced scoring model will be fully developed by June 2002 and will leverage Standard & Poor's analytic strength and global credit experience, and RDB's comprehensive database of financial information and robust default data.

As a membership organization, RDB has, to date, operated by aggregating financial and company data on SMEs gathered from its 38 member institutions. Member banks in turn, gain access to RDB's database and scoring models, and use the information to internally rate the financial positions of unlisted companies.

Standard & Poor's and RDB will work together to further develop the scoring model, as well as collaborate to improve the quality of recovery data and develop analytics for a recovery rate estimation model.

Risk Solutions is the credit risk services arm of Standard & Poor's.  If you have any further questions about Risk Solutions, or if a colleague would like to be added to our mailing list, please write to us at risksolutions@standardandpoors.com and include your full contact information.

We use your contact information to keep you informed of research, products and services from the Standard & Poor's and McGraw-Hill families of companies. At any time, if you wish to be removed from our mailing list, please send an email to risksolutions@standardandpoors.com.

For more information about The McGraw-Hill Companies Customer Privacy policy please visit http://www.mcgraw-hill.com/privacy.html.

________________________________________________________________
The information contained in this message is intended only for the recipient, may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, please be aware that any dissemination or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify us by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer.

Thank you,
Standard & Poor's


_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Tuesday, February 05, 2002 9:22 AM
To:	Vuittonet, Laura; Rangel, Ina; Young, Becky; Hogan, Irena D.
Subject:	RE: Fundamentals Presentation

This meeting has been changed to Thursday, Feb 7th from 2-4 p.m.  It will be held in the same conference room (ECS06990).

Thanks,
Amanda

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Monday, February 04, 2002 10:24 AM
To:	Vuittonet, Laura; Rangel, Ina; Young, Becky; Hogan, Irena D.
Subject:	Fundamentals Presentation

Assistants, please forward to your groups.

The Fundamentals group is giving a presentation tomorrow, Feb 5th from 2-4 in room ECS06990.

The topic will be the Gas Market.

Thanks,

Amanda Rybarski
Gas Fundamentals
Office: (713) 853-4384
Fax: (713) 646-8453
Pager: (877) 482-0772
Cell: (713) 560-0934


Please see attached.  Let me know if you need anything else.