TransAtlantic | The Atlantic Online | http://www.theatlantic.com

March 2, 2001

+ THIS WEEK ...

Last week we asked, If poets are the "unacknowledged legislators of the
world," what of journalists, in particular one Christopher Hitchens? This
week, in the latest installment of Atlantic Unbound's Soundings series, we
bring you the genuine article -- i.e., poetry -- in three side-by-side
readings of Andrew Marvell's seventeenth-century seduction poem, "To His
Coy Mistress," introduced in a brief essay by Linda Gregerson. Many have no
doubt read this anthology warhorse in high school or college English
classes ("Had we but world enough and time/ This coyness, Lady, were no
crime..." and so on). But we're willing to wager that you've never heard it
quite like this. The readers are three noted poets -- Gregerson, J. D.
McClatchy, and Heather McHugh -- each of whom knows how to perform a poem.
And Gregerson's introduction is a rare treat: a deviously smart, witty,
sexy, and original close analysis that you don't need a Ph.D. in English
literature to understand and enjoy. Imagine. No, don't imagine; see (and
hear) for yourself.

Also this week: the conclusion of Christopher Hitchens's exchange with
James Fallows, new recipes on Corby's Table, a bit of economic analysis
from Sage Stossel, and more.

Cheers,

Wen Stephenson
Editorial Director
The Atlantic Online

-------------------------------------------------------

+ In ATLANTIC UNBOUND, The Atlantic's online journal ...

Fallows@large
THE WORK OF WORDS [PART THREE]
Mar 1 |  "I am in the uncomfortable position," James Fallows writes to
Christopher Hitchens, "of holding a widely caricatured view, which I will
try to defend. Namely, that Clinton's actions in the past six weeks justify
a harsher view of him than his previous conduct did. The contrary case is,
'What took you so long?' In this analysis, Clinton is behaving no
differently now from the way he has over the past eight years. My case is:
the way Clinton behaved in his final weeks in office, above all with the
pardons, actually was different from his previous record." See Hitchens's
reply to Fallows in the concluding round of their exchange on writing,
politics, Henry Kissinger -- and Bill Clinton.
http://www.theatlantic.com/unbound/fallows/jf2001-02-21/fallows3.htm

Soundings
MARVELL'S "COY MISTRESS"
with Linda Gregerson, J. D. McClatchy, and Heather McHugh
Feb 26 | "Can this poem really be after what it purports to be after?"
Linda Gregerson asks in her introduction. "Can it, as a seduction poem, by
even the wildest stretch of imagination be designed to work? What kind of
woman would be successfully wooed like this?" Poets McClatchy and McHugh
join Gregerson as each gives voice to Andrew Marvell's "To His Coy
Mistress."
http://www.theatlantic.com/unbound/poetry/soundings/marvell.htm

Corby's Table
ISRAEL ON A BUN
by Corby Kummer
Feb 28 | " 'Why can't a country with two and a half million Jewish mothers
have better food?' Henry Kissinger supposedly moaned while conducting
shuttle diplomacy in the 1970s. Even today Israel isn't known for the
quality or variety of its restaurants -- although Joan Nathan, an
indefatigable expert on Jewish food and the author of monumental and
authoritative books on the subject, says that things have changed
enormously since the days when she lived there, in the early 1970s." Corby
Kummer looks at Joan Nathan's new book, *The Foods of Israel Today*, and
offers his favorite selections.
http://www.theatlantic.com/unbound/corby/ct2001-02.htm

Sage, Ink
FAITH-BASED ECONOMICS
Feb 28 | A cartoon by Sage Stossel.
http://www.theatlantic.com/unbound/sage/ss2001-02-28.htm

-------------------------------------------------------

+ In D.C. DISPATCH | from National Journal

Social Studies
FORGET THE MARC RICH PARDON. WORRY ABOUT THE SCANDAL
by Jonathan Rauch
Mar 1 | In the Rich ruckus, what is taking place is an attack not just on a
pardon, but on the pardon power itself.
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/nj/rauch2001-03-01.htm

Legal Affairs
HOW THE MARC RICH PARDON COULD SPAWN A NEW PROSECUTION
by Stuart Taylor Jr.
Mar 1 | The prosecutors' most logical target is Rich, not Clinton. In
politics, it's more dangerous to give than to receive.
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/nj/taylor2001-03-01.htm

Political Pulse
WHY ALL THE SMILES ON THE RIGHT?
by William Schneider
Mar 1 | Interestingly, conservatives see George W. as far more of a Reagan
conservative than Daddy Bush.
was.http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/nj/schneider2001-03-01.htm

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

THE ATLANTIC MONTHLY EDUCATION PROGRAM
Teachers, put The Atlantic's quality to work in your classroom withour new
Education Program. Affordable rates, FREE Teacher's Guide, and FREE
instructor's copy with each qualifying order. Please visit
http://www.theatlantic.com/teach/
for details or call toll-free,(877) 299-8577.

-------------------------------------------------------

GET A RISK-FREE TRIAL ISSUE OF THE ATLANTIC MONTHLY
TransAtlantic readers, you can receive a RISK-FREE trial issue of The
Atlantic Monthly magazine. Just fill in the short form at
http://www.theatlantic.com/free/
and we'll rush our next issue to you. No obligation.

-------------------------------------------------------

To remove your name from our mailing list, send an e-mail to
listserv@theatlantic.com with UNSUBSCRIBE TRANSATL written in the BODY of
the message (subject text will be ignored), or go to the TransAtlantic page
at the URL below, enter your e-mail address and select "Unsubscribe."
http://www.theatlantic.com/transatlantic/

If you would like help or more information, send a message to
listserv@theatlantic.com with the word HELP in the BODY of the e-mail.


Kaye:  I would like to schedule a meeting for sometime after June 8 (when our
new paralegal Samantha arrives) with Donna and Samantha.  We will need a
conference room.  1 hour.  Taffy has Samantha's schedule.  I know she has
orientation on June 8.  If Tana is "training" on June 9, 10, etc., I could
borrow 1 hour.  Thanks.  Sara
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 05/26/2000 04:12 PM -----

	Donna Lowry
	05/24/2000 12:53 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: monitoring of equity accounts

I  would love it if we could meet.  We have made a little bit of headway in
this effort, but quite frankly, not much.  In fact, I have seen DASH's that
is indicating the purchase of public equity and I am trying to find out who
and how etc these are being transacted.  Can you set something up or do you
need me to. I will bring somebody from my group to help and learn so we
probably need a conference room.  Thanks for keeping this issue alive.
Donna  P.S.  Has Marie moved to EBS or is she still with you?

From: Sara Shackleton on 05/23/2000 08:59 AM
To: Donna Lowry/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: monitoring of equity accounts

Donna:  It's been awhile since we last spoke about advising Enron companies
of existing brokerage accounts.  It has also been determined (in legal) that
the accounts will remain with ME and not move to Alan A.  I have some
temporary assistance in that an A&K lawyer, Jason Peters, is working up here
for another few weeks.  I was hoping that we could all meet and put our
"project" into action.  Please give me a call and suggest some time when we
may meet.  Thanks.  Sara


Hi team.  I may be inviting you to a chat on Thurs.
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 03/28/2000 04:54
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Colleen Sullivan                           03/28/2000 12:49 PM

To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: storage clarification & issues

Chris--FYI--are you available for a meeting Thursday, March 30 at 11:00 a.m.
to discuss these issues?  If so, will you ask Kim to get a room for us for
about an hour?

Thanks.

---------------------- Forwarded by Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT on 03/28/2000
12:47 PM ---------------------------

mflewellyn@columbiaenergygroup.com on 03/28/2000 12:34:07 PM
To: " - *colleen.sullivan@enron.com" <colleen.sullivan@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: storage clarification & issues

Colleen,

Attached is an updated storage proxy schedule for COH and AGL showing what our
balance will be as of April 1, 2000.  As always, if you have any questions,
please let me know.  I'm sending a copy of the document to Denny Pick for
signature and will then send it to Jeff Hodge to get signature from Enron.

Aside from the storage issue, there are several other items that we need to
discuss.  Below is a brief description of each.  Please let me know how you
think we could best deal with these - whether it's via phone call or having an
in-person meeting down in your office.

1.  Pricing - I left you a message about this last week.  According to Chris
Germany, all changes to volumes after first-of-the-month must me negotiated.
In the contract, however, it specifically refers to pricing intra-month using
gas daily OR negotiated pricing depending on the timing of the change.

2.  Consistency - During our discussions with Chris, it sounds as though some
pipes are being handled differently than others again as it relates to
intra-month changes.  I'd just like to make sure that we agree on the pricing
mechanism and then apply it consistently.

3.  Local production - Apparently there was local production that John Singer
purchased specifically to back Retail customers, and this production was not
removed from the Wholesale book prior to the sale.  We need to discuss how to
handle this production.

4.  Monthly invoices - We still haven't seen the complete January 2000
invoice.  As I understand it, the demand charges have not all been sent over,
and several items that need to be changed haven't yet been changed.  Also,
Brian Perrone and Charlie Dalphon have indicated that they have requested
back-up documentation on the demand charges, but we still haven't received
anything.

5.  Swap confirmations - For all of the swaps that Clay Deaton put in place
with Enron to keep Retail's existing hedge positions in tact, I still do not
have executed copies of all of the confirmation agreements.  Rich Contos and I
have both called several people about getting a complete set of copies, but we
can't seem to find the right person over there.

Whenever you have time to discuss these, please let me know.

Thanks,

Melissa


I don't know how it happened but I have fixed my spreadsheet with the revised numbers for engine 101C. I am trying to track down the VOC emissions from the plant that could be used to calculate VOC ERCs. The person I need to talk to works the night shift at the methanol plant so I won't be able to talk to him until this evening.

Marc

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Taylor, Michael E
Sent:	Monday, September 24, 2001 7:02 PM
To:	Phillips, Marc
Subject:	emission allocations

Marc,

I ran the numbers, and I am attaching the same spreadsheet.  I hide the cells were I did my calculations.  Can you look at the Engine 101C, again?  That is the only set we got large differences.  If you have a chance to look at this in the morning, that would be great.  Give me a call if you have any questions.

Also, can you narrow down anymore the VOC that would be earned?

 << File: methanol plant allowances1.xls >>

Thanks,
Michael Taylor
Coal and Emissions Trading
Enron Global Markets
(713) 853-1885


All-
Please find attached an updated version of the CLN swap presentation we passed around today.  Also, (for Kelli, Louis, & Jonathan) I have saved an updated version of the model in the dropbox--I removed the CDO section at Mike's direction. Thanks for your help!
Brian
3-5009


Hi,

Just like to say that it has been great meeting and working with you all.  I
will be leaving Enron effective July 5th  to do investment banking in Hong
Kong.   I will initially be based in New York and will be moving to Hong Kong
after a few months.  Do contact me when you are in the vicinity.  I don't
know my contact details yet and would let you know once I get it.   In the
meantime, I will always be checking my e-mail at royibasco@yahoo.com.  Please
let me know what your e-mail addresses are and keep in touch!

Best regards,

Roy


I have found a mistake in AS #7, on problem 4, parts f and g.  The MR
function is wrong which messes up the answers for the rest of the problem.
I apologize for missing this.  I sincerely hope, however, that you caught
this mistake in doing the problems.  At this point, such a mistake should
be quite noticeable.  I have included the correction in an attached word
file. Sorry this is so late.

J. Lamar Pierce
Ph.D Student
Haas School of Business
UC Berkeley

 - Correction to AS.doc


The following are CAL businesses who responded to Ken Lay's first direct mail
package.  These businesses responded by email and/or telephone.  All of the
CEOs identified a point person within their respective organization whom we
should contact directly in order to coordinate.
Paramount Studios
Gap, Inc
Northrup Gruman
AMD (SVMA)
US Borax
Cisco (SVMA)
Commerce One
Raley's

The following were not interested in working with us at this time
Catholic Healthcare West
Intuit

Number of hits to Enron's CAL business website dedicated to the energy crisis
As of April 2nd, our California page had been loaded 16 times from
individuals outside of Enron.  This site was created specifically for the CAL
business direct mail effort.  The 115 businesses who were sent the package
were the only entities that we promoted this site with. **if you are an enron
employee, it's okay to hit the site from within the Enron building.  We can
differentiate between hits from inside and outside of Enron.  If you work for
Enron outside of the EB in Houston.....please do not go to the site.  Our
ability to track hits will then be skewed.  Thanks.**


I wanted to e-mail you a letter following up on our meeting last week.  I hope
you are doing well and will reach out for you next week.

(See attached file: October 18.doc)

Sincerely,

Paige Hochberg

 - October 18.doc


---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 01/11/2001
11:29 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Jeffrey A Shankman                           01/11/2001 11:24 AM

To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 01/11/2001
11:26 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Jeffrey A Shankman                           12/29/2000 10:40 AM

To: Gary Hickerson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

For the roundtable:

Gas:  John Arnold, Phillip Allen, Mike Grigsby, maybe Hunter Shively
Pwr:  Fletch Sturm, Rogers Hearndon, maybe Kevin Presto
Oil:  John Nowlan, Bill White, maybe Adam Gross
Coal/Emissions:  Kevin Mcgowan
Equities:  Gary Hickerson, Michael Bradley
Other:  Vince Kaminski, Jen Fraser

Have I left anyone off?  What do you think?


FYI this is what Joe Hillings was asking for.
---------------------- Forwarded by Ricardo Charvel/NA/Enron on 02/18/2000
01:43 PM ---------------------------

Ricardo Charvel
02/18/2000 01:43 PM
To: Joe Hillings/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: Mexico-Secretary Richardson Is Leaving For A Mexico Meeting With
Minister Tellez Today-Need Talking Points ASAP

Joe,

I am sorry I missed your call.  Max and I had a conference call with Chris
Long on Monday in which we touched upon some of these points but I think that
it is important for us to insist in the following:

1 Regulate the pricing of infrastructure and services for true
undiscriminated open access. To enhance the possibility of having a
competitive natural gas markets through importing gas in northern Mexico it
is necessary to set a regulated price for the use of infrastructure which is
in hands of a monopoly or where there is no alternative..  Currently Pemex is
able to offer discounts in infrastructure (transport) and other services in a
way which effectively creates barriers of entry to any competitor even in the
marketing segment of the business.

2. Promote complete unbundling between Pemex affiliates in the gas business.
There has to be a true unbundling between Pemex Production (PEP) and Pemex
transport and marketing (PGPB).  Currently anyone that wants to buy gas has
to do so from the PEMEX marketer/transporter (PGPB) instead of being able to
buy gas from the producer, pay for the transport etc.  in a transparent way
and within real competitive circumstances.

3. Revise the 1996 natural gas pricing directive.  In this pricing formula
Pemex  fixed a differential that is subtracted from the Tetco-Valero Price.
This differential changes according with the conditions of the market.  The
conditions of the market have changed since 1996 making this fixed
differential a true barrier of entry for competition.  The differential
should be included as a variable that is subject to real market conditions.

In conclusion we could say that despite apparent changes in the natural gas
industry in Mexico, the truth is that there are many aspects within the way
in which Pemex operates that can be changed that would allow for true
competition.  There is still a lot of work to do in these matters.  We work
closely with the Mexican regulators in relation to these matters.

Best,

Ricardo Charvel
Director of Strategy
011-525-258-9933

P.S. Maybe Secretary Richardson could retake the subject o Hedging Mexican
oil by Enron and others in order to guarantee Mexico a stream of income that
otherwise might not be there if prices fall.


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 04/20/2001 03:59 PM -----

	Walter Guidroz/ENRON@enronXgate
	04/20/2001 03:55 PM

		 To: Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel
Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/ENRON@enronXgate,
Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli
Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate, Cynthia Clark/ENRON@enronXgate, Enron Europe
Global CounterParty/LON/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/ENRON@enronXgate, Tom
Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Claudia Clark/ENRON@enronXgate, William S
Bradford/ENRON@enronXgate, Lisa Lees/ENRON@enronXgate, Juana
Fayett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jana Morse/Corp/Enron@Enron, Trang Le/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Paul Maley/LON/ECT@ECT, Sonya Clarke/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim Davies/LON/ECT@ECT,
Karen ODay/ENRON@enronXgate, Tanya Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Kelly
Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron, Brian Lindsay/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, EOL Call Center@ECT, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill D
Hare/HOU/ECT@ect, Amy Heffernan/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Molly LaFuze/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Danny Clark/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron, Teresa
Mandola/ENRON@enronXgate, Bill Kyle/ENRON@enronXgate
		 cc:
		 Subject: EOL approvals, 04-20-01

Please see attached.


On May 10, 2001, a memo was sent out regarding "Peer Group Mapping".  This mapping is intended to illustrate from a functional view point where each activity was placed at Year End 2000 VP PRC.

Please refer to the attached original memo, if you have not responded to David Oxley and have any comments
please respond to him by May 25, 2001.

Dave Delainey

Following my note last week please find attached the consolidated peer group mapping for all business units. This mapping is intended to illustrate from a functional view point where each activity was placed at Year End 2000 VP PRC.

We were considering moving to a 3 Peer Group Structure however it as agreed at the last PRC Committee Meeting  to stay with the current structure since the data had been cleaned and everyone felt generally comfortable where most activities had been placed with the exception of just  2 or 3. It was agreed that we should concentrate on resolving these rather than undertaking an organization wide remapping excercise to consolidate to 3 Peer Groups. All functions/activities within the business units should now be reflected on the acttached.

The actions points from this excercise are:

1	to review and agree the attached mapping

2    consider and comment on highlighted groups that we have discussed in previous PRC meetings and ask for your comments or objections to moving them 	as indicated on the attachment.

3	invite your comments or questions on any other function that you consider questionable or requiring further explanation.

      Please return your comments to David Oxley by Friday May 25.

      To have this discussion now will save lengthy discussions in the final VP/MD PRC Meetings.  Definitions of the peer groups are also attached for your ease of
      reference.


Sorry for my tardy reply.  I have been covered up.  Thanks anyway.  Mark


Dad is at Howard Johnson at 9604 S Main, room 403, phone 713-666-1411


Latest presentation!
Ben


FYI


Vector Pipeline has appointed Craig R. Fishbeck as president of Vector.
Vector believes that Fishbeck's extensive industry experience and knowledge
of Vector's market area position him well to lead the company through its
December 2000 start-up and coming years of growth. The pipeline also believes
Fishbeck's appointment strengthens Vector's role as a vital link between the
Chicago Hub and Dawn, Ontario, to help meet the growing demand for natural
gas in the U.S. Midwest, Eastern Canada and the U.S. Northeast. Fishbeck
comes to Vector from CMS - Panhandle where he held the position of vice
president, marketing.


Hey!


Please see the attached Management Report for June 26, 2000:

Total  Today Year To Date Life To Date

Number of Transactions  2,385 165,717 170,718
Gross Notional Value $  1,161,577,352 77,934,052,694 79,148,739,267
(The above value numbers do not include UK Power due to severe system issues.)

Revenue from Physical flows to date ($)  4,760,181,617 4,855,933,109

New Counterparties transacting today  5
Counterparties having transacted to date  378

Also attached is the Public Domain Report, containing information which is
intended for use in presentations or reports which will be seen by
individuals outside Enron:

Total Life to Date Transactions   > 169,000, which is > 52 % of Enron,s
current transactions for the month
Average Daily Transactions    > 2,000
Life to Date Notional Value of Transactions > $78 billion
Average Daily Notional Value    = Approximately $1 billion, which is 45% of
Enron,s Notional Volume
Number of Products Offered Each Day  = Approximately 820


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 12/01/2000
04:16 PM ---------------------------
From: Shalesh Ganjoo@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS on 11/07/2000 10:03 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: gappy@stanfordalumni.org, Martin Lin/Contractor/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Shalesh Ganjoo/Contractor/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications
Subject: Technical Survey

Gentlemen,

We are attaching below a document on Internet Protocol (IP) written by
Martin.  We hope you will find it informative and provide us with some feed
back to improve it.  Shalesh is still working on documents for fiber optics
and storage.  We felt that they were not complete and therefore not ready for
review.  We hope to have them ready for your review soon.  In the mean time
we would appreciate any comments you may have about the IP document.  Thank
you.

Sincerely,

Shalesh and Martin


OK then.  Don't forget about me.  Someday you are going to want me working over there.

I'm a jewel, and modest too.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Bartlo, Noel" <Noel.Bartlo@ElPaso.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Wednesday, April 17, 2002 9:50 AM
To:	Germany, Chris
Subject:	RE: Contact

sure do.

-----Original Message-----
From: Germany, Chris [mailto:Chris.Germany@ENRON.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 9:45 AM
To: Bartlo, Noel
Subject: Contact

I hope I have the right email address.  Let me know.

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************

******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso
Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the
use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the
sender.
******************************************************************


Thanks for the follow up.  --sally

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rosen, Michael
Sent:	Monday, June  4, 2001 10:57 AM
To:	McConnell, Mike; Beck, Sally; Elliott, Lexi
Subject:	Oklahoma follow up

Below is a quick follow up to some of the things I mentioned I'd check out at our last meeting.  Please let me know how I can be of assistance with your efforts.

Contributions
The contributions from last year that I mentioned at the meeting turned out to be inclusive of Enron Corp., individual and matching funds.

Weather
I had a chance to talk with our folks from the Weather Group.  The information regarding Oklahoma that I told you I'd look into actually ended up being a center for Weather Research that was being sponsored by Williams not our weather group.

Scholarship
There are a couple of different scholarship and fundraising initiatives underway that are being driven by Enron employees and alumni of the individual universities employed here.  They take advantage of matching funds and are administered by employees here with some assistance by Community Relations and University Affairs.  If you are interested in organizing an effort like this for Oklahoma, let me know and I can work with you on the details.


per Tina's e-mail on 8/28/01.


I haven't talked to anyone.  I've got 10 docs going out this am, but I'm
almost finished.

From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 01/10/2001 10:46 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: How about Vincent's for lunch?

Sheila can't go today because of work.  Carlos called, is he still going?
It's your birthday lunch, what do you want to do.

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	01/10/2001 10:42 AM

		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: How about Vincent's for lunch?

Sounds good, but if today isn't a good day, it is not a problem.

From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 01/10/2001 10:35 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: How about Vincent's for lunch?


get me a spot on the shuttle.  But I'll probably use a car service.  What
time does this concert thing start, and can you get me all other directions,
and info.  Thanks.  Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 02/15/2001 08:45 AM -----

	Nicki Daw/ENRON@enronXgate
	02/14/2001 05:03 PM

		 To: Cindy Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J
Lavorato/ENRON@enronXgate, Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marty
Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, Raymond Bowen/ENRON@enronXgate, Rick Buy/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Wes
Colwell/HOU/ECT@ECT, James A Hughes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc: Jennifer Burns/HOU/ECT@ECT, Connie
Blackwood/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kimberly
Hillis/ENRON@enronXgate, Janette Elbertson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cathy
Corbin/HOU/EES@EES, Marsha Schiller/ENRON@enronXgate, Karen K
Heathman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patti Thompson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Maureen
McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron, Shirley Tijerina/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kathy
McMahon/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Rodeo - Monday 19th February

I am pleased you and your spouse are able to join me at the Rodeo on Monday
19th February.  Your tickets will be delivered to your office tomorrow
(Thursday).

The Enron Suite is number 23.  It will be open from 5.30pm.  As there is no
parking at the Astrodome, I have arranged for a shuttle bus to run from the
Enron Building to the Astrodome from 6pm until 10.30pm.  If you would like to
utilize this, please respond to Nicki Daw (x33497).

Depart Enron Building for Astrodome
 6pm
 6.45pm
 7.30pm

Depart Astrodome for Enron Building
 9pm
 9.45pm
 10.30pm

Please click on the following link to see the itinerary for 19th February.
http://www.rodeohouston.com/calendar/day.cfm?day=2%2F19%2F2001

Mark


Glencore Ltd. is a Swiss corporation.

	David Minns@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	05/24/2000 06:00 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Paul Smith/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 Subject: Re: EOL / Credit / GCP Responses 5/24/00

No objection to Glencor Ltd. - where are they incorporated?

From: Tana Jones@ECT on 05/24/2000 06:33 PM CDT
To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy E
Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT,
David Portz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Marie Heard/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Robbi Rossi/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications
cc:

Subject: EOL / Credit / GCP Responses 5/24/00

----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 05/24/2000 06:33 PM -----

	Tom Moran
	05/24/2000 05:31 PM

		 To: Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli
Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Gillette/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda S Bryan/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Connie Sutton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sylvia A Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Molly
Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cynthia Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Samuel
Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary G Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Enron Europe Global Contracts
and Facilities, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: EOL / Credit / GCP Responses 5/24/00

Please find attached Credit's EOL responses for 5/24/00

Regards
tm


I have entered deals into Sitara.  The supply deals are 384247 and 384237.
The sale is 384258.  The sale is not currently booked at the correct location
or with a counterparty.  The pricing on the sale includes the admin fee,
transport, demand charges, an average of the buy prices and 1% fuel charge.
If the pricing is wrong (or anything else), please let me know and I'll redo
it.  Please let me know of any concerns/questions.

Dave


Got it.
See u at 7PM on Fri.

-----Original Message-----
From: Amy Yueh [mailto:ayueh@hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 12:37 PM
To: andrew.h.lewis@enron.com; Peter.Wu
Subject: Fwd: Re: Restaurant Name

Peter/ Andy, it's called Chino Express in English and directions are below.

>From: "John Huang" <thx_135@hotmail.com>
>To: ayueh@hotmail.com, ron_he@dell.com
>Subject: Re: Restaurant Name
>Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 12:23:46 -0500
>
>It's located on Beachnut, in the shopping center on the right hand side
>after Boone, if you are coming from BeltWay 8
>
>
>>From: "Amy Yueh" <ayueh@hotmail.com>
>>To: thx_135@hotmail.com, ron_he@dell.com
>>Subject: Restaurant Name
>>Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 12:09:24 -0500
>>
>>John/ Ron:
>>
>>Do you guys remember that Peking duck place we went to where you had to
>>call 2 hours in advance where they had that yummy spicy noodle fish dish?
>>
>>What is the name of that place and their telephone number?  and the
>>location?
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Amy  : )
>>
>

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp


I have the changes in place in order to start capturing the storage balance(s) for the 2 identified PG&E points ("PG&E Storage" and "Wild Goose Storage").  The next scrape time for PG&E is 12:30 today, so we can evaluate the first run of these values shortly after that.

Through the end of the week (and even beyond), this data should be monitored closely, to make sure the calculations are correct.

Any questions/concerns, let me know.

Chris

Pipeline ID:		47
DRN's:			PGEINV, WILDGOOSEINV

Data starts with effective date 05/12/2001, cycle 7  (this value obtained from the old PG&E Operational Report, needed to 'seed' the rolling calculations)


Jeff - did you:
1) okay this for Cynthia to ticket already?
2) need the seat assignments for Prentice's booking?

I'm not sure what you've done here on your own.

Joseph
---------------------- Forwarded by Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron on 07/30/2001 02:34 PM ---------------------------

Cynthia Biggs <cynthia.biggs@travelpark.com> on 07/30/2001 02:13:43 PM
To:	"'jeff.dasovich@enron.com'" <jeff.dasovich@enron.com>
cc:	"'joseph.alamo@enron.com'" <joseph.alamo@enron.com>

Subject:	review and approve jeff dasovich 2aug travel - must ticket today 	for fare

                                          AGENT CB/CB BOOKING REF Y8T96W

                                          DASOVICH/JEFF
                                          ENRON CORP
                                          101 CALIFORNIA ST STE 1950
  ENRON CORP                              SAN FRANCISCO CA 94111
                                          MAIL ETKT RCPT

  DATE:  JUL 30 2001

SERVICE               DATE  FROM           TO             DEPART  ARRIVE

UNITED AIRLINES       02AUG SAN F CA       NEW YORK NY    915A    549P
UA 862     B          THU   SAN FRANCISCO  JOHN F KENNEDY
           NON SMOKING      TERMINAL N     TERMINAL 6
                            BREAKFAST/SNACK               NON STOP
                            RESERVATION CONFIRMED         5:34 DURATION
                  AIRCRAFT: BOEING 767-200/200ER
                            SEAT 16E NO SMOKING CONFIRMED DASOVICH/JEFF(I
                          AISLE SEAT CONFIRMED

HOTEL                 02AUG W HOTEL NEW YORK
                      05AUG 541 LEXINGTON AVENUE
                            NEW YORK, NY 10022
                            UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
                            TELEPHONE: 212-755-1200
                            FAX: 212-319-8344
                            TELEX: NONE
                            CONFIRMATION: C575237015
                            REFERENCE: C1QENR
                            DOUBLE ROOM QUEEN SIZE BED
                            RATE: ENR USD 269.00 PER NIGHT
                            GUARANTEE GIVEN
                            ENRON RATE NON SMKNG
             TO AVOID BILLING CANCEL 24HRS PRIOR TO ARRIVAL.

UNITED AIRLINES       05AUG NEW YORK NY    SAN F CA       415P    731P
UA 5       B          SUN   JOHN F KENNEDY SAN FRANCISCO
           NON SMOKING      TERMINAL 6     TERMINAL N
                            DINNER                        NON STOP
                            RESERVATION CONFIRMED         6:16 DURATION
                  AIRCRAFT: BOEING 767-200/200ER
                            SEAT 22B NO SMOKING CONFIRMED DASOVICH/JEFF(I
                          AISLE SEAT CONFIRMED

MISCELLANEOUS         03DEC HOUSTON TX
                      MON   ** THANK YOU FOR USING THE TAP **

RESERVATION NUMBER(S)  UA/LMF96O

DASOVICH/JEFF  S0C0011R1000

UA  FREQUENT FLYER UA369321854
*******************************************
INTL TVLRS: CARRY SOS WALLET CARD W/ENRON ASSISTANCE INFO
CALL SOS MEDICAL EMERGENCY:IN U.S 800 523-6586
CALL SOS MEDICAL EMERGENCY:INTL 215 245-4707 (COLLECT)
*********************************************
HADV THE AIRLINE OF YOUR FREQUENT FLYER NUMBER
THIS IS THE PASSENGER RECEIPT FOR YOUR ELECTRONIC TICKET.
PLEASE CHECK-IN WITH PHOTO IDENTIFICATION AND WITH
EITHER (1) THIS RECEIPT OR (2) YOUR CONFIRMATION NUMBER.
YOUR ETKT CONFIRMATION NUMBER IS: LMF96O
***************************************************
TICKET PRICE IS 1636.80 ROUNDTRIP REFUNDABLE
THIS IS AN ADVANCE PURCHASE FARE THAT REQUIRES
TRAVEL ON THESE SPECIFIC DATES AND FLIGHTS.
CHANGES ARE SUBJECT TO AVAILABILITY AND REQUIRE
AT LEAST 3 DAYS ADVANCE NOTICE
ALL FARES ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE UNTIL TICKETED/PURCHASED


000
WTNT32 KNHC 261438
TCPAT2
BULLETIN
TROPICAL STORM OLGA ADVISORY NUMBER   8
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE MIAMI FL
11 AM AST MON NOV 26 2001

...SUBTROPICAL STORM TWO BECOMES TROPICAL STORM OLGA...

SATELLITE IMAGERY THIS MORNING INDICATES THAT THUNDERSTORM ACTIVITY
HAS INCREASED AROUND THE CENTER OF SUBTROPICAL STORM TWO...AND
THAT IT HAS BECOME TROPICAL STORM OLGA.  AT 11 AM AST...1500Z...THE
CENTER OF OLGA WAS LOCATED NEAR LATITUDE 30.7 NORTH...LONGITUDE
56.1 WEST OR ABOUT 515 MILES...830 KM...EAST OF BERMUDA.

OLGA IS NOW MOVING TOWARD THE NORTHWEST NEAR  7 MPH...11 KM/HR.  A
GENERAL NORTHWESTWARD TO WEST-NORTHWESTWARD MOTION IS EXPECTED
DURING THE NEXT 24 HOURS.

MAXIMUM SUSTAINED WINDS ARE NEAR  70 MPH...110 KM/HR...WITH HIGHER
GUSTS.	SATELLITE IMAGERY INDICATES OLGA IS TRYING TO FORM AN EYE...
AND IT COULD BECOME A HURRICANE LATER TODAY.

TROPICAL STORM FORCE WINDS EXTEND OUTWARD UP TO 555 MILES
...890 KM MAINLY TO THE NORTHWEST OF THE CENTER.

ESTIMATED MINIMUM CENTRAL PRESSURE IS  979 MB...28.91 INCHES.

SHIP REPORTS INDICATE A VERY LARGE FIELD OF 12 FT OR GREATER SEAS IS
ASSOCIATED WITH OLGA.  SWELLS FROM THE STORM ARE ALREADY REACHING
BERMUDA AND PORTIONS OF THE U. S. MID-ATLANTIC STATES.	THESE
SWELLS WILL REACH THE ISLANDS OF THE NORTHERN CARIBBEAN FROM
HISPANIOLA EASTWARD LATER TODAY OR TONIGHT...AND REACH THE BAHAMAS
AND THE REMAINDER OF THE EASTERN COAST OF THE UNITED STATES OVER
THE NEXT DAY OR TWO.

REPEATING THE 11 AM AST POSITION...30.7 N... 56.1 W.  MOVEMENT
TOWARD...NORTHWEST NEAR  7 MPH.  MAXIMUM SUSTAINED
WINDS... 70 MPH.  MINIMUM CENTRAL PRESSURE... 979 MB.

THE NEXT ADVISORY WILL BE ISSUED BY THE NATIONAL
HURRICANE CENTER AT 5 PM AST.

FORECASTER BEVEN

Make GoPBI.com's Storm Warning Center your No. 1 resource for hurricane
and tropical storm updates: http://GoPBI.com/storm

To subscribe or unsubcribe from this list, visit our Web site:
http://GoPBI.com/storm/email

DO NOT REPLY to this email. If you have questions or comments,  send
them to storm@cimedia.com

Brought to you by GoPBI.com: http://GoPBI.com

You can contact us by mail or telephone at:
GoPBI.com
2751 South Dixie Highway
West Palm Beach FL 33405
(561) 820-3700

Copyright 2001 Cox Interactive Media


Tana,

I have sent a confidentiality agreement to their CFO. We are awaiting
execution.


George-- are you ok for the 8yh?

-----Original Message-----
From: Brownfeld, Gail
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 10:10 AM
To: Sanders, Richard B.
Subject: RE: Proposed New Schedule

	I haven't heard back from George yet.  I'll confirm with him. It's set as far as Brobeck and I are concerned.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Sanders, Richard B.
Sent:	Tuesday, September 25, 2001 10:04 AM
To:	Brownfeld, Gail
Subject:	RE: Proposed New Schedule

I have to move some stuff around on the 8th. Is that set in stone?

-----Original Message-----
From: Brownfeld, Gail
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 9:54 AM
To: 'Markel, Gregory A.'; Johnson, Christopher P.
Cc: Mcclellan, George; Sanders, Richard B.
Subject: RE: Proposed New Schedule

	Are you available for a call with George and I this afternoon?  George, what works for you?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Markel, Gregory A. [mailto:GMarkel@brobeck.com]
Sent:	Monday, September 24, 2001 7:28 PM
To:	Brownfeld, Gail; Johnson, Christopher P.
Cc:	Mcclellan, George; Sanders, Richard B.
Subject:	RE: Proposed New Schedule

The 8th is fine. Mel knows he never responded since I have raised that with
him three times. George we need your help with Seth. I was in Washington
today and they are not ready on damages although they were supposed to be. I
am going to meet them again on Friday to drive this foward. They need
additional information from you and maybe a pep talk. I have already tried
to impress on them the urgency of the situation.
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)

=======================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to postmaster@brobeck.com
BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP
http://www.brobeck.com


>
>

 - frogpult.exe


---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT on 04/24/2001
09:42 AM ---------------------------

merlinm@uswest.net on 04/23/2001 07:57:00 PM
Please respond to merlinm@uswest.net
To: "Andrew Clark" <amc_97@yahoo.com>, " Andrew Evans"
<r38882@email.sps.mot.com>, " B-Game" <chadburlingame@hotmail.com>, " Billy
O'sullivan" <OSullB@aol.com>, "Brad Dousevicz" <bdouse@aol.com>, " Brandon
Upah" <bupah@rhythms.net>, "bubba" <mpdesimone@msn.com>, " Chapstick"
<sharriage@netscape.net>, " drew brown" <dbrown_europe@hotmail.com>, " Eric
Paulsen" <Eric.Paulsen@hugheschris.com>, " eric wood" <eawood33@hotmail.com>,
" Gabe Meyers" <didjian@hotmail.com>, "Flynn" <tflynn@vtm-inc.com>, " Jason
Cole" <jcoletrickle@yahoo.com>, " Kate Kress" <kkress@mve-architects.com>, "
khristopher Tabaknek" <ktabaknek@dtjboulder.com>, " Lois Brink"
<lbrink@carbon.cudenver.edu>, " Mark Fasanella" <mfasanella@edgewood.edu>, "
Mark Uris" <uris@scd.ucar.edu>, " Matt Lenhart" <Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com>,
" Michael Hartman" <flippy_hartman@yahoo.com>, " Mitchell"
<jmitchell@fairenterprises.com>, " Morrill" <Scott.Morrill@Grubb-Ellis.com>,
" Peder" <pederleifkjeseth@hotmail.com>, " rebecca bicknell"
<beckbick@yahoo.com>, " Ryan Arni" <rarni@mkkeng.com>, "Ryan Lee"
<ralee@rmi.net>, " Scott Berberich" <scottberb@yahoo.com>, " Scott Vander
Putten" <primemover@netzero.net>, " Spud" <sprouty2000@hotmail.com>, "UNce"
<masicajm@osd.pentagon.mil>
cc:

Subject: something groovy fr. the Dali Lama

Hey everybody.  Enjoy!

Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-Path: <cmaley@integerdenver.com>
Delivered-To: merlinm@mail-dnvr.uswest.net
Received: (qmail 90923 invoked by uid 0); 23 Apr 2001 18:51:27 -0000
Received: from mail4.uswest.net (204.147.80.22)  by dnvrpop4.dnvr.uswest.net
with SMTP; 23 Apr 2001 18:51:27 -0000
Received: (qmail 34733 invoked by uid 0); 23 Apr 2001 18:51:26 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.93.5.70?) (205.169.187.6)  by
mail4.uswest.net with SMTP; 23 Apr 2001 18:51:26 -0000
Received: from [10.93.20.211] by domino-mail01.integer.com     with SMTP
(QuickMail Pro Server for Mac 2.0.1); 23-Apr-2001 12:35:52 -0600
Date: 23 Apr 2001 13:39:53 -0600
Message-ID: <-1224089305cmaley@integerdenver.com>
From: "Chris Maley" <cmaley@integerdenver.com>
Sender: "Chris Maley" <cmaley@integerdenver.com>
To: "ann fisher" <Annfishernyc@aol.com>,  "bill maley"
<bill.maley@solutionspoint.com>,  "brian jacobson" <btjacob@qwest.com>,
"chuck stiebling" <chuck@stieblingali.com>, "sasha ali" <sashaali@att.net>,
"merlin" <merlinm@uswest.net>, "kate maley" <KateMaley@aol.com>
Subject: Fwd: something groovy to do...
X-Mailer: QuickMail Pro 2.0.4 (Mac)
X-Priority: 3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: Chris Maley <cmaley@integerdenver.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-Ascii"
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000

>
>
> > - The Dalai Lama said read it to see if it works for you.
> >
> > PERSONALITY TEST.
> >
> > Very interesting. Just 4 questions and the answers will surprise you....
> >
> > Do not cheat by looking up the answers. The mind is like a parachute
>works
> >
> > best when it is opened.
> >
> > This is fun to do, but you have to follow the instructions very closely.
> > Do
> > not cheat.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > MAKE A WISH BEFORE BEGINNING THE TEST!!
> >
> >
> >
> > A Warning! Answer the questions as you go along..
> >
> >
> >
> > There are only four questions and if you see them all before finishing
>you
> >
> > will not have honest results.
> >
> > Go down slowly and do each exercise as you scroll down. Don't look
>ahead.
> > Get pencil and paper to write your answers as you go along. You will
>need
> > it
> > at the end. This is an honest questionnaire, which will tell you a lot
> > about
> > your true self..
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Put the following 5 animals in the order of your preference.
> >
> > a. Cow
> >
> > b. Tiger
> >
> > c. Sheep
> >
> > d. Horse
> >
> > e. Pig
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Write one word that describes each one of the following:
> >
> > Dog
> >
> > Cat
> >
> > Rat
> >
> > Coffee
> >
> > Sea
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Think of someone (who also knows you and is important to you) that you
>can
> >
> > relate them to the following colors.
> >
> > (Please do not repeat your answer twice. Name just one person for each
> > color.)
> >
> > Yellow
> >
> > Orange
> >
> > Red
> >
> > White
> >
> > Green
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Finally, write down your favorite number and your favorite day of the
> > week.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Finished? Please be sure that your answers are what you REALLY WANT.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Look at the interpretations below: (but first before continuing, repeat
> > your
> > wish.)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > This will define your priorities in your life.
> >
> > Cow signifies CAREER
> >
> > Tiger Signifies PRIDE
> >
> > Sheep Signifies LOVE
> >
> > Horse Signifies FAMILY
> >
> > Pig Signifies MONEY
> >
> >
> >
> > Your description of dog implies YOUR OWN PERSONALITY.
> >
> > Your description of cat implies the personality of your partner.
> >
> > Your description of rat implies the personality of your enemies.
> >
> > Your description of coffee is how you interpret SEX.
> >
> > Your description of the Sea implies your own life.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yellow: Someone you will never forget
> >
> > Orange: Someone you consider your true friend.
> >
> > Red: Someone that you really love
> >
> > White: Your twin soul
> >
> > Green: Someone that you will remember for the rest of your life.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > You have to send this message to as many persons as your favorite number
> > and your wish will come true on the day that you put. This is what the
> > Dalai
> > Lama has said about the Millennium -- just take a few seconds to read it
> > and
> > think.
> >
> > Do not put away this message, the mantra will come out from your hands
>in
> > the next 96 hours.
> >
> > You will have a very pleasant surprise. This is true, even if you are
>not
> > superstitious.
> >
> >
> >
> > Please do this. It is fascinating.
> >
> > SEND THIS E-MAIL MANTRA TO AT LEAST FIVE PERSONS AND YOUR LIFE WILL
> > IMPROVE
> >
> > 0-4 persons: Your life will improve slightly.
> >
> > 5-9 persons: Your life will improve to your liking.
> >
> > 9-14 persons: You will have at least 5 surprises in the next three weeks
> >
> > 15  or more persons: Your life will improve drastically and all that you
> > have always dreamed will take shape.
> >
> > If at any time you do not receive the smile you were expecting, be
> > generous
> > and give that person a smile.
> >
> > Because nobody has as much  necessity of a smile than the person that
>does
> >
> > not know how to smile at others.
> >

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com


ABZCZC-CIV-CEM-0060130000-1921544-

This is a message from Chevron.  This is a drill.  Have a nice day
ABNNNN

EDIS-07-12-01 0838 PDT

---------------------------------------------------------
To update or terminate your subscription to this email service
visit our webpage at http://www.incident.com/edismail.html.

EDIS is operated by the Governor's Office of Emergency Services,
State of California. This email relay is offered by incident.com
as a public service. Because of the complexity of this system and
its dependence on other systems, we cannot be responsible for
delays or failures in transmission.
---------------------------------------------------------


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 01/08/2001 12:58
PM ---------------------------

KWiemer@milbank.com on 01/08/2001 12:13:24 PM
To: Kay.Mann@enron.com, Lisa.Bills@enron.com, Roseann.Engeldorf@enron.com,
Catherine.Clark@enron.com, john.cody@csfb.com, Roger.Ondreko@enron.com
cc: LHarris@milbank.com

Subject: RE: CA Development

Attached are our comments to the Assignment and Assumption and the Bill of
Sale as noted earlier.? I look forward to seeing revised drafts and forms for
the purchase by CAED II.

Regards, Karl

 <<enxt cmnts .PDF>>

-----Original Message----- From:?? Kay.Mann@enron.com
[SMTP:Kay.Mann@enron.com] Sent:?? Friday, January 05, 2001 5:39 PM To:????
Lisa.Bills@enron.com; Roseann.Engeldorf@enron.com; Catherine.Clark@enron.com;
john.cody@csfb.com; kwiemer@milbank.com; Roger.Ondreko@enron.com

Subject:??????? CA Development

(See attached file: Purchase Option Notice(CAED I)rev1.doc)(See attached
file: Assumption with GE ack(CAEDI)rev1.DOC)(See attached file: Bill of
salerev1.DOC)

Attached are drafts of the documents to effect the transfer of two GE
turbines and one ABB transformer to CAED I and CAED II.? The dates and
amounts are bracketed, as pending the determination of the closing date. We
will need sets for both CAED I and CAED II, with II receiving the
transformer.? These will be prepared with the forms are agreed.

These documents are subject to internal Enron review, but in the interest of
time I am sending the documents to everyone.

Thank you,

Kay ?<< File: Purchase Option Notice(CAED I)rev1.doc >>? << File: Assumption
with GE ack(CAEDI)rev1.DOC >>? << File: Bill of salerev1.DOC >>

This e-mail message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee or
agent responsible for delivery of this message to the intended recipient(s),
you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of
this e-mail message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message
in error, please immediately notify the sender and delete this e-mail message
from your computer.

 - enxt cmnts .PDF


I don't think the triggers are correct.

Ed, this brings up a good question that may already be addressed. Both of the Midland deals still show up in the trading system.  Should they be terminated effective 6/1/2002?  One of the Midland deals (MCV 2, deals #340305 and 332163) was put in Sitara with triggers.  We stopped serving MCV 2 effective 4/1/2002.  These triggers will continue to create an invoice each month unless we change the deal in Sitara.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Price, Wade R.
Sent:	Monday, June 03, 2002 1:57 PM
To:	Germany, Chris
Cc:	Dhont, Margaret; Doner, Max
Subject:	Deal for Midland Cogen w triggers

Please check into deals 332163 and 340305 for sales invoices to Midland Cogen.  Max Doner thought these deals would not trigger activity anymore per your note to him on 5/13.  I see where these deals were updated by you on that date.  Are the deals legit, or are the triggers generated legit.  Please let me know ASAP.

Thanks  WRP


FYI
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 03/28/2001 11:04 AM -----

	Jean Munoz <jmunoz@mcnallytemple.com>
	03/27/2001 08:53 PM

		 To: Katie Kaplan <kaplan@iepa.com>, "'Andy Brown (E-mail)'"
<ABB@eslawfirm.com>, "'B Brown Andy (E-mail)'" <andybrwn@earthlink.net>,
"'Baker Carolyn (E-mail)'" <cabaker@duke-energy.com>, "'Bob Escalante
(E-mail)'" <rescalante@riobravo-gm.com>, "'Bob Weisenmiller (E-mail)'"
<rbw@mrwassoc.com>, "'Curtis Kebler (E-mail)'"
<curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com>, "Dean. Nistetter (E-mail)"
<Dean.Nistetter@dynegy.com>, "'Douglas Kerner (E-mail)'" <DKK@eslawfirm.com>,
"'Greg Blue (E-mail)'" <gtbl@dynegy.com>, "'Jan Smutny-Jones (E-mail)'"
<smutny@iepa.com>, "'Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)'" <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>,
"'Joe Ronan (E-mail)'" <joer@calpine.com>, "'John Larrea (E-mail)'"
<john.g.larrea@williams.com>, "'John Stout (E-mail)'"
<John_H_Stout@reliantenergy.com>, "'Julee Malinowski-Ball (E-mail)'"
<jmball@ns.net>, "'Kassandra Gough (E-mail)'" <kgough@calpine.com>, "'kent
Palmerton (E-mail)'" <kent.palmerton@williams.com>, "'Lynn Lednicky
(E-mail)'" <lale@dynegy.com>, "Marie Moretti (E-mail 2)"
<mmoretti@mccabeandcompany.net>, "'Marty Wilson (E-mail)'"
<mwilson@pstrategies.com>, "'McNally Ray (E-mail)'"
<rmcnally@mcnallytemple.com>, "''Nam Nguyen' (E-mail)'"
<nam.nguyen@powersrc.com>, "'Norton Kelli (E-mail)'"
<knorton@mcnallytemple.com>, "'Paula Hall-Collins (E-mail)'"
<paula.hall-collins@williams.com>, "'Pigott Jack (E-mail)'"
<jackp@calpine.com>, "'Richard Hyde (E-mail)'" <rwhyde@duke-energy.com>,
"'Roger Pelote (E-mail)'" <roger.pelote@williams.com>, "'Stephanie-Newell
(E-mail)'" <stephanie-newell@reliantenergy.com>, "'Sue Mara (E-mail)'"
<smara@enron.com>, "'Tom Ross (E-mail)'" <tross@mcnallytemple.com>, "Tom
Williams (E-mail)" <tcwillia@duke-energy.com>, "'Alex Sugaoka (E-mail)'"
<alex.sugaoka@uaecorp.com>, "'Bill Carlson (E-mail)'"
<william_carlson@wastemanagement.com>, "'Bill Woods (E-mail)'"
<billw@calpine.com>, "'Bob Ellery (E-mail)'" <bellery@spi-ind.com>, "'Bob
Gates (E-mail)'" <bob.gates@enron.com>, "'Cody Carter (E-mail)'"
<cody.carter@williams.com>, "'Curt Hatton (E-mail)'"
<Curt.Hatton@gen.pge.com>, "'David Parquet'" <david.parquet@enron.com>,
"'Dean Gosselin (E-mail)'" <dean_gosselin@fpl.com>, "'Doug Fernley (E-mail)'"
<fernley.doug@epenergy.com>, "'Duane Nelsen (E-mail)'"
<dnelsen@gwfpower.com>, "'Ed Tomeo (E-mail)'" <ed.tomeo@uaecorp.com>,
"'Eileen Koch (E-mail)'" <eileenk@calpine.com>, "'Eric Eisenman (E-mail)'"
<eric.eisenman@gen.pge.com>, "'Frank DeRosa (E-mail)'"
<frank.derosa@gen.pge.com>, "Frazier Blaylock (E-mail)"
<frazier_blaylock@ogden-energy.com>, "'Hap Boyd (E-mail)'"
<Hap_Boyd@enron.com>, "'Hawks Jack (E-mail)'" <jack.hawks@gen.pge.com>, "'Jim
Willey (E-mail)'" <elliottsa@earthlink.net>, "'Joe Greco (E-mail)'"
<jgreco@caithnessenergy.com>, "'Jonathan Weisgall (E-mail)'"
<jweisgall@aol.com>, "'Kate Castillo (E-mail)'" <CCastillo@riobravo-gm.com>,
"'Kelly Lloyd (E-mail)'" <kellyl@enxco.com>, "'Ken Hoffman (E-mail)'"
<khoffman@caithnessenergy.com>, "'Kent Fickett (E-mail)'"
<kfickett@usgen.com>, "'Lynn Lednicky (E-mail)'"
<lynn.a.lednicky@dynegy.com>, "'Marty McFadden (E-mail)'"
<marty_mcfadden@ogden-energy.com>, "'Paula Soos'"
<paula_soos@ogden-energy.com>, "'Randy Hickok (E-mail)'"
<rjhickok@duke-energy.com>, "Rick S. Koebbe (E-mail)"
<rskoebbe@powerworksinc.com>, "'Rob Lamkin (E-mail)'"
<rllamkin@seiworldwide.com>, "'Ross Ain (E-mail)'" <ain@worldnet.att.net>,
"'Steve Iliff'" <siliff@riobravo-gm.com>, "'Steve Ponder (E-mail)'"
<steve_ponder@fpl.com>, "'Tony Wetzel (E-mail)'" <twetzel@thermoecotek.com>,
"'William Hall (E-mail)'" <wfhall2@duke-energy.com>,
<trusso@mcnallytemple.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Initiative Campaign Strategy Outline

The following memo is for discussion during our Wednesday public affairs
committee meeting.
Thanks!  Jean

March 26, 2001

MEMORANDUM

To:    IEP
Fr:     Ray McNally, Richard Temple, Tony Russo, Jean Munoz, Tom Ross
Re:   Initiative Campaign Strategy Outline

Harvey Rosenfield has on numerous occasions threatened to place an initiative
on the 2002 ballot to re-regulate the power industry.

It is not a hollow threat.

Not only has Rosenfield successfully placed initiatives on the ballot in the
past, but the current energy crisis has become the number one issue on the
minds of voters dd making it easier to qualify a ballot measure.  And our own
internal polling for IEP shows voters would initially support the concept of
re-regulating the industry.

However, qualifying an initiative for next year?s election is not a foregone
conclusion.  And passing one is an even more difficult task.

Rosenfield faces several roadblocks:

o    The current energy issue is complicated, and all potential solutions
have weaknesses that could be exploited in a political campaign.

o    IEP?s internal polling shows Rosenfield?s proposal has weaknesses that
could be exploited dd including the price tag and the image of a state-run
energy department that could be compared to the DMV and CalTrans.

o    Rosenfield would have a difficult time funding a campaign, especially
raising the resources to overcome a strong, well funded "no" campaign.

o    The burden of "proof" always falls on the "yes" campaign rather than the
"no" campaign.  Voters are concerned about giving their approval to changes
that could make things worse.  Rosenfield will have to prove his case beyond
a shadow of a doubt, and therefore it is easier to defeat an initiative than
it is to pass one.

o    If power generators become motivated they can be a formidable opponent.

Following is (1) a preliminary timeline Rosenfield would face in trying to
qualify an initiative for the ballot in 2002, (2) strategic concepts that
should be considered before pursuing a plan to defeat the initiative, (3)
preliminary strategic and tactical options in opposing the initiative, and
(4) a discussion of campaign costs.

We recommend using this outline as a starting point to develop an effective
campaign plan that could successfully defeat Rosenfield if he pursues an
initiative strategy.

Timeline

To date, no proposed ballot initiative has been submitted to the Attorney
General for title and summary.  Accordingly, there is not sufficient time
available to qualify an initiative for the March 2002 ballot.

However, there is still adequate time to qualify a measure for the November
2002 ballot.  We believe Rosenfield could submit a measure to the Attorney
General as late as September, 2001 and still qualify the initiative for the
November 2002 ballot dd especially if the summer months produce power
blackouts, skyrocketing energy bills, and the image of a bungling Governor,
legislature and regulators.

The following timeline would allow Rosenfield to submit language for title
and summary as late as September 28, 2001 and qualify the initiative for the
November 2002 ballot:

September 28, 2001

Proposed measure is submitted to the AG for title and summary.

November 20, 2001

Attorney General prepares and issues title and summary.  Proponent can begin
circulating petitions.

April 19, 2002

The proponent files the petitions with county elections officials.

May 1, 2002

County elections officials complete petition raw count totals and certify raw
numbers to the Secretary of State.

June 23, 2002

County elections officials verify and certify results of the number of valid
signatures in their counties and turn in counts to the Secretary of State.

June 27, 2002

Secretary of State determines if the initiative qualifies for the ballot.
Proponent needs 670,816 valid signatures to qualify a constitutional
amendment or 419,260 valid signatures to qualify a straight statute.

Strategic Concepts

There are several strategic concepts that should be reviewed:

o    While satisfying Rosenfield may be impossible, IEP could push hard to
ensure a "solution" is passed by the legislature to give credibility to the
criticism that Rosenfield is an extremist whose initiative could undercut the
legislative remedy.

o    The industry could organize a well-funded campaign that contains an
early advertising blitz to quickly define the ballot measure in the most
negative manner possible, and that delivers a knock out punch in October.

o    Generators could promote a counter-initiative proposal, either through
the legislature or qualified by petition dd stopping Rosenfield?s proposal if
more "yes" votes are received for the counter initiative than the Rosenfield
measure.

o    Paid signature gathering firms could be put on contract for
industry-related business dd thus keeping these firms off the table for
Rosenfield.  Another variation would be to hire firms to gather signatures
calling for legislative action dd thus gaining names of voters who support
our position, but also keeping signature gatherers too busy to help
Rosenfileld.

o    The industry could pay to gather signatures on petitions that removes
names of people who may have signed the petition for Rosenfield?s
initiative.  This could cut down the number of valid signatures accepted by
county election officials.

o    A paid advertising campaign could be run during the proposal?s signature
gathering phase urging voters not to sign the petitions.  An added benefit of
the concept is defining the proposal early if it still qualifies for the
ballot.

o    We could organize a legal assault on the proposal dd stopping their
signature gathering efforts or keeping it off the ballot.

Campaign Strategy

If the proposal qualifies for the ballot, the industry must pursue an
aggressive strategy to defeat the measure.  We need to identify weaknesses in
the proposal and share those weaknesses with voters.  We must also push
voters to question the motives behind the initiative.  We need to make sure
voters are uncomfortable with all or portions of the initiative to ensure
they vote no despite wanting adequate and affordable energy.

The campaign should conduct thorough research to determine the best strategy
to defeat the measure.  Initially we believe the "no" campaign should focus
on testing and developing the following messages:

o    The measure will hurt taxpayers.  A $40 billion price tag is too much
for voters to accept as the only solution to the problem.

o    The proposal will hurt public services.  The cost of Rosenfield?s
measure will keep money away from more important programs  dd like schools,
public safety and programs for children and seniors.

o    The ballot measure is simply a way for elected officials to get more tax
dollars to cover up their failures dd and they should not be rewarded with
public support.

o    Rosenfield?s proposal will result in higher taxes to pay for more
bureaucracy and wasted tax dollars.

o    The proposal will result in more inefficient government that will
produce unreliable power dd hurting consumers, and vital services such as
hospitals and public safety.

o    The measure will hurt the economy and cost jobs at a time when the
economy is hurting.

Campaign Tactics

The campaign should follow an aggressive battleplan that includes the
following components:

Research

Focus groups and quantitative surveys should be conducted to help craft the
best messages to attack the proposal.  This research would also be important
in efforts to secure the most favorable ballot title and summary possible to
our goal of defeating it.

Demographic and election research should also be conducted to determine
voters most open to our campaign messages.  We should also conduct thorough
research on Rosenfield to expose his true motivations for proposing this
measure and its inherent weaknesses.

Legal, Title & Summary, and Ballot Argument Challenges

We should pursue every possible legal option to either get the proposal off
the ballot, or ensure the most favorable title & summary and weakened ballot
arguments for the initiative sponsors.  Our experience shows that the ballot
title and summary can swing initial vote margins either way by as much as 10
points.

Paid Advertising

Statewide campaigns in California require paid advertising dd including
electronic media, direct mail, and telemarketing.  Advertising should be
carefully targeted to ensure the most "bang for the buck."

Earned Media

Editorial support is an important part of successful statewide campaigns, as
is ensuring favorable media coverage of the campaign.  A focused earned media
campaign would greatly enhance the chances for success and editorial support
and Op-Ed?s can provide important third party credibility to the no campaign.

Coalition Building

It will be critical for the industry to gain credible allies in its fight
against Rosenfield.  We do not want the campaign to be portrayed as
generators versus consumer groups.  Therefore, we need credible, third party
groups standing along side us to broaden our appeal and message, like
taxpayer groups, business leaders, consumer organizations, energy experts,
economists, educators, law enforcement and seniors.

Campaign Costs

How much will be needed to defeat Rosenfield will depend on several factors.
Depending on several variables, the cost of a "no" campaign can range from a
few million dollars to as much as the $40 million spent to defeat Proposition
9.

Campaign costs to defeat ballot measures are contingent upon several
variables:

o    The popularity of the measure with voters.  The more they like it on the
natural, the more expensive it will be to defeat the measure.

o    How much money Rosenfield can raise to promote the measure.  If he has
few resources, the "no" campaign will have an uncontested paid advertising
campaign, which will make defeating the proposal much easier.

o    How bad the energy crisis impacts voters.  If the next 15 months produce
an on-going crisis, campaign costs will rise.

o    The effectiveness of messages against the proposal.  If focus group and
survey research confirm the proposal has an Achilles heel, the cost to defeat
the measure will go down dramatically.

Thorough research of Rosenfield?s actual proposal will better enable us to
recommend a campaign plan, message and budget.  In summary, defeating the
Rosenfield initiative will cost from a few to several million dollars and a
united industry effort.


fyi...

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Sandra Yamane <SYamane@marathon-com.com>@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Sandra+20Yamane+20+3CSYamane+40marathon-com+2Ecom+3E+40ENRO
N@ENRON.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2001 12:29 PM
To: Denne, Karen
Subject: Long Beach Press-Telegram Online.htm

 <<Long Beach Press-Telegram Online.htm>>

 - Long Beach Press-Telegram Online.htm


Hi Andy -

Very good to hear from you --

As of the 1st of the month, I am now working for Allegheny in New York, with
Barry Kostiner and Jake Goldberg (not the fitness guru of the same name).  I
called you at home but got your answering machine - send me your work number
to this address and I'll call you sometime during the day tomorrow if that's
convenient.

Alex

----- Original Message -----
From: "Zipper, Andy" <Andy.Zipper@ENRON.com>
To: <alexeaton@msn.com>
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 6:01 PM
Subject: whats up

Heard you had ended up at Allegheny. In NYC or Hagerstown MD ?

Drop me a line, I want to discuss something with you.

Hope all is well.

Andy


The report named: East P/L Totals <http://trv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=1&report_name=East+P/L+Totals&category_cd=1&category_name=EAST&toc_hide=1&sTV1=1&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=11/01/2001>, published as of 11/01/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


Well, there's a little lesson in the value of being polite to EVERYONE.

From: Sheila Tweed@ECT on 03/19/2001 01:47 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: Tex-Mex High Voltage DC project

----- Forwarded by Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT on 03/19/2001 01:47 PM -----

	John Schwartzenburg@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	03/19/2001 12:46 PM

		 To: Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Tex-Mex High Voltage DC project

Woops, whoa, yikes !  There, the sand stopped shifting for a moment.

It seems that me and mine belong to Messr. Haedicke and you guys. Will fill
you in as the day progresses.

JWVS

	Sheila Tweed@ECT
	03/19/2001 11:38 AM

		 To: John Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Tex-Mex High Voltage DC project

I saw the latest reorg announcement.  Where did you end up?  Are you still
with Vicki?


I will be out of the office from 05/26 through 06/03.  Cara will be scheduling Mid Columbia in my absence.

Thanks, Donald.


COLUMBIA GAS TRANSMISSION CORPORATION
                        NOTICE TO ALL INTERESTED PARTIES
                                OCTOBER 29, 2001

Notice ID: 3222
5 - NO RESPONSE REQUIRED

SUBJECT: CAPACITY UPDATE EFFECTIVE FOR TUESDAY, OCTOBER 30, 2001

                   NO CHANGES FROM PREVIOUS DAY

Effective Tuesday, October 30, 2001, capacities will be as follows:

Excess MDWQ              Available +
ISS Withdrawals          Available
SIT Withdrawals          Available
Imbalance Drawdowns      Available

Excess MDIQ              Available +
ISS Injections           Available
SIT Injections           Available
Imbalance Paybacks       Available

PAL Lends/Unparks        Available
PAL Parks/Loan Paybacks  Available

+ Call Gas Control 24 hours in advance at (304) 357-2606 to request approval.

Non-firm receipt capacity will be as follows:

TENNESSEE:

Brinker (B12)            20,000
Broad Run (B9)          300,000
Cambridge (B10)          20,000
Dungannon (B11)          20,000
Highland (B17)                0

NOTE: GAS RECEIVED AT HIGHLAND MUST BE DELIVERED IN THE NORTHERN PORTION OF
MARKET AREA 38 OR THE NORTHWEST LATERAL OF MARKET AREA 36, DIRECTLY NORTH OF
HIGHLAND.

Milford (B18)            20,000
North Greenwood (B22)         0
Unionville (B15)         50,000

NOTE:  EFFECTIVE THURSDAY, AUGUST 16, 2001, ANY SHIPPER UTILIZING A CONTRACT
THAT HAS A PRIMARY RECEIPT POINT(S) WITH THE FOLLOWING POINTS, MUST UTILIZE
THESE POINTS:

         Brinker       (B12)
         Cambridge     (B10)
         Dungannon     (B11)
         Highland      (B17)
         Milford       (B18)
         Unionville    (B15)

TEXAS EASTERN:

Delmont (C16)                 0
Eagle (C22)              20,000
Hooker (C9)              20,000
Pennsburg (C23)          20,000
Windridge (C12)          20,000

NATIONAL FUEL:

Independence (M1)             0
Ellwood City (L1)        15,000

TRANSCO:

Downingtown (E3)          2,500
Emporia I (E13)          60,000
Rockville (E2)                0
Dranesville (E1)              0

EQUITABLE GAS:

Hi Hat (F3)                   0

KENTUCKY WEST VIRGINIA (KYWV):

Beaver Creek (H1)             0

CNR PIPELINE:

Boldman (CNR02)               0
Conoway (CNR03)               0
Johns Creek (CNR08)           0
Canada (CNR09)                0
Canada (CNR10)                0
Stafford (CNR11)              0
Thacker/Majestic (CNR12)      0
Briar Mtn. (CNR13)            0
Huff Creek (CNR14)            0

CONOCO:                       0

Grant (P1)                    0

NOTE:  ANY APPALACHIAN PRODUCTION FLOWING DIRECTLY INTO COLUMBIA'S LINE KA
BETWEEN COLUMBIA'S BOLDMAN COMPRESSOR STATION AND COLUMBIA'S HUFF CREEK
COMPRESSOR STATION AS WELL AS PRODUCTION FLOWING INTO COLUMBIA'S LINES SM-116,
KA-15, PM-3, AND PM-17 IS 0 NON-FIRM.

ALGONQUIN:

Ramapo (R1)              75,000

ANR:

Paulding/Cecil           30,000
(F1, A2)

LEBANON AGGREGATE       100,000
(A4, F2, C4, D3)

TOLEDO AGGREGATE        100,000
(A3, F4, 734462)

COLUMBIA GULF:
(801)

TCO-Leach               700,000

Internal point non-firm capacity will be as follows:

Lanham                        0

Delivery capacity (non-firm) will be as follows:

TRANSCO:

Martins Creek            10,000
  (MLI E5)
Young Woman's Creek      10,000
  (MLI E9)

ALGONQUIN:

Hanover                       0
  (MLI R2)

EQUITRANS:

Fallen Timber            31,000
  (MLI K1)

Waynesburg-Rhinehart     20,000
  (MLI K2)

OPT-30 will be available in all market areas.
OPT-60 will be available in all market areas.

Market Area delivery capacity (non-firm) will be as follows:

Operating Area 1
     Market Area 33       No Restrictions
     Market Area 34       No Restrictions

Operating Area 2
     Market Area 20       No Restrictions

Operating Area 3
     Market Area 15       No Restrictions
     Market Area 16       No Restrictions
     Market Area 17       No Restrictions
     Market Area 18       No Restrictions
     Market Area 19       No Restrictions

Operating Area 4
     Market Area 21       No Restrictions
     Market Area 22       No Restrictions
     Market Area 23       No Restrictions
     Market Area 24       No Restrictions
     Market Area 25       No Restrictions
     Market Area 29       No Restrictions

Operating Area 5
     Market Area 02       No Restrictions
     Market Area 07       No Restrictions

Operating Area 6
     Market Area 10       No Restrictions
     Market Area 11       No Restrictions
     Market Area 12       No Restrictions
     Market Area 13       No Restrictions
     Market Area 14       No Restrictions

Operating Area 7
     Market Area 01       No Restrictions
     Market Area 03       No Restrictions
     Market Area 04       No Restrictions
     Market Area 05       No Restrictions
     Market Area 06       No Restrictions
     Market Area 08       No Restrictions
     Market Area 09       No Restrictions

Operating Area 8
     Market Area 26       No Restrictions
     Market Area 27       No Restrictions
     Market Area 32       No Restrictions
     Market Area 35       No Restrictions
     Market Area 36       No restrictions for southern part of Market Area 36.
                          Primary receipts/deliveries only for gas delivered
                          in the northern portion of Market Area 36.
     Market Area 38       No Restrictions
     Market Area 39       No Restrictions
     Market Area 40       No Restrictions

NOTE:  GAS DELIVERED IN THE NORTHERN PORTION OF MARKET AREA 38 OR THE NORTHERN
PORTION OF MARKET AREA 36 MUST BE RECEIVED FROM TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE AT
HIGHLAND.

Operating Area 10
     Market Area 28       No Restrictions
     Market Area 30       No Restrictions
     Market Area 31       No Restrictions

If you have any questions, please contact your Account
Representative.


Hey (insert name here),

Thank you for your response, it's very nice to meet you!  By the way, my name is Tracy or you can call me tp081996, ha ha!  So, what was it about me that caught your attention anyway?  Have you dated many women off of the Internet?  What has been your best/worst dating experience?  Are you originally from CO or elsewhere?  Please tell me a little more about yourself as I'm interested in getting to know you!

Take care,

Tracy

*********************************************************

IMPORTANT TIPS TO REMAIN ANONYMOUS AT Match.com:

If you use the "reply" button to respond to this message, please take the following steps:

1.  DELETE ALL TEXT from the body of your message, including header information which may include your actual email address.

2.  REMOVE ANY AUTOMATIC SIGNATURES which may include your personal contact information.

Our anonymous re-mailer will strip away your real email address (in the From: field), so that it will NOT appear in the "From:" line. However, DO NOT use the "Cc:" or "Bcc:" fields as these addresses CANNOT be stripped away.

You may also contact this person from their Match.com profile by clicking "Contact this person" and composing your message directly from the site.

Match.com does not monitor private email between members, nor are we liable for the content of these messages. All members are bound by our Match.com Service Agreement.


Hello!

These deal have NP/SP delivery points with firm energy.
576522
576512
576523
576517
576513
and 576511, but this one is also the wrong CP name.  Reliant HLP doesn't
trade in the west.  I think it should be Reliant Energy Services.

Thanks!


Hi Steven,

 Attached is the first of four documents that we have prepared for
the focus groups.  All of the exercises are works in progress and I am
sending them to you for comments. (Hopefully, we are on the right track.)
As we discussed, I am happy to fly down to Houston tomorrow so that we can
review these materials together.  If, however, you feel that we can edit the
exercises via email that's fine too. Just let me know which arrangement
makes you the most sense to you. Hope all is well.

Regards,

Liz

 <<anti regulation speech.doc>> An anti-dereg speech is in the works.

 - anti regulation speech.doc


Bob,

I am writing to you to confirm my voice-mail message regarding the SEC deposition.
I decided that I don't really  need a counsel to assist me at my deposition before
the Commission. I may retain a lawyer of my own choice to give me general
advice about the procedures and I shall send you the bill for reimbursement
of expenses.

My decision should not be interpreted as a statement about Mr. Levy's qualifications.
I found him to be an exceptionally competent lawyer. My only regret is that I shall not be given
an opportunity to spend more time with him and learn from his experience.

You may recall that  I have indicated to you a few weeks ago that my intention was to waive my
right to a counsel.  This was before I had the pleasure to meet Mr. Levy in person.

I am sending you the copy of my fax to the SEC as an attachment to a separate message.

Vince


--------- Begin forwarded message ----------
From: president@juno.com
To:
Subject: Exciting NEWS - FREE Internet Access!
Date: Wed Dec 22 16:30:24 EST 1999
Message-ID:

Dear Juno member,

We have exciting news for you!  We have decided to expand our free basic
service to include full Web access.  This means you can now use the World
Wide Web completely FREE.  No charges, no fees, no commitments.*  This is
not a free trial.  It's free, period.

What do you get with Juno's completely free Internet access service?

- Access to everything the Internet has to offer.
- Hundreds of access numbers across the country.
- File attachment capability with your e-mail.
- The Juno Guide, a floating banner directing you to some of the most
interesting sites on the Web.

In order to start using the Web for FREE, you need to have the latest
version of our software, version 4.0.  This new version only takes about
15 minutes to download (with a 56K modem).

There are two ways for you to get the software:

1) If you already have Web access, you can download Juno 4.0 at
http://www.juno.com/junofree.
2) If you don't have Web access, click on the 'Advertisements' menu at
the top of your screen and select 'Index of Advertisements' from the menu
that drops down.  Then select the Juno 4.0 advertisement, and you'll be
presented with a screen allowing you to download the software.  It's that
easy!

Hurry!  Act now and get on the Web, completely FREE.

Sincerely,

Charles Ardai
President
Juno Online Services, Inc.

*As with your current service, local telephone charges may apply.  Please
consult your local phone company if you have any questions about the
access numbers you have chosen.

--------- End forwarded message ----------

________________________________________________________________
YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET!
Juno now offers FREE Internet Access!
Try it today - there's no risk!  For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.


In today's edition of the Daily Update, we look at the silver linings
for telecom equipment stocks and even Enron. Indeed, where the latter
is concerned, eMarketer senior analyst Steve Butler explains how Enron's
online trading platform changed the energy trading landscape and
created opportunities that would not have otherwise existed. Also,
frequent contributor John Filar Atwood discusses three telecom
equipment stocks with brighter outlooks than expected.

You can link directly to our research page, which features synopses
of broker and free reports, and you can also register for the free
Morgan Stanley trial by clicking on the Morgan Stanley logo, here:
http://www.multexinvestor.com/article.asp?docid=6420&nd=0128

***************************************************************
You are receiving this mail because you have registered for
Multex Investor. To unsubscribe, see bottom of this message.
***************************************************************

======================== Sponsored by =========================

Get 10 FREE issues of Investor's Business Daily. More than just a newspaper,
Investor's Business Daily is a unique research tool designed to identify
winning stocks with insightful charts and ratings you can't find anywhere
else.This offer carries no obligation and there's nothing to cancel.

http://ibd.infostreet.com/cgi-bin/freeoffer.cgi?source=A362GGL
==============================================================

Below
--------

- Investment ideas
- Broker and third-party research
- Online advice and chats
- Free and sponsored reports

Investment ideas
-----------------------------------------

1. INVESTMENT IDEAS
The EnronOnline diaspora
Online energy trading has been orphaned, not aborted

By Steve Butler, senior analyst, eMarketer

Although the company is now defunct, and while its behavior has taken a
serious financial toll on many individuals and companies, Enron's legacy
also includes its role as an Internet trailblazer. Indeed, by its sheer size
and ambition, the company was able to change the way that its
competitors traded, permanently and significantly altering both the
energy sector and the Internet.

To get an idea of the magnitude of what we're dealing with, according to
company data, Enron's (ENE) Internet-based trading exchange,
EnronOnline, was processing about 4,000 transactions per day
worldwide, with an average deal size of about $500,000, by September
of 2001. At an annualized rate, the notional value of online transaction
activity conducted through EnronOnline was approximately $510 billion--
a healthy increase from the $101 billion in transactions during 2000.

Click here to read more.
http://www.multexinvestor.com/article.asp?docid=6425&nd=0128

2. INVESTMENT IDEAS
Analysts see brighter earnings picture for three equipment companies
In an uncertain market, analysts seem sure about the earnings potential of
these companies

by John Filar Atwood, equity research columnist

The reduction in capital spending by major carriers has weighed on telecom
equipment stock performance in recent months, and threatens to do so
throughout 2002. The consensus estimate now appears to be a 26 percent
drop in carrier capital expenditures in 2002 resulting in a 23 percent
decline in aggregate revenues for the equipment group.

Click here to read more.
http://www.multexinvestor.com/article.asp?docid=6434&nd=0128

======================== Sponsored by =========================

Buyback Guru Sells 4 Stocks, Locks in +46.8% in 3 Months!

David Fried knows a stock is undervalued when the company
buys back its shares. Thats how he locked in a whopping
+46.8% in three short months! "Buy these 6 tech buybacks
today," Fried says. Get them with a FREE 30-day trial:

http://www.investools.com/c/go/BACK/MTEX1B-backTY2
==============================================================

Broker and third-party reports
-----------------------------------------

1. INVESTORS' CHOICE: 3-DAY FAVORITE
Bear Stearns publishes a 'top ten list' of Internet security predictions for
2002.

After a page of general sector commentary, the firm discusses its list; #3
prediction calls for more sophisticated virus attacks, #6 prediction is that
the biometric hype fizzles, #10 predicts security vendor stocks that will
outperform. (4-page report for purchase - $10)
http://www.multexinvestor.com/download.asp?docid=25966746&nd=0128

2. TODAY'S SPECIAL REPORT
Prudential provides analysis and an earnings preview for 7 fun-time
stocks under coverage.

Prudential identifies its favorite 3 12-month ideas as well as its top
turnaround candidate from AOL, DIS, Liberty (L), Pixar (PIXR), Six Flags
(PKS), USA (USAI), and VIA. Individual commentaries on each stock. 53
figures. (88-page report for purchase - $150)
http://www.multexinvestor.com/download.asp?docid=26049306&nd=0128

3. EDITOR'S PICK: CURRENT RESEARCH FROM THE CUTTING EDGE
CIBC World Markets discusses Microsoft's (MSFT) recent earnings and
prospects.

CIBC provides its investment conclusion on the stock, analysis of
MSFT's income statement, balance sheet, comments on the outlook for
the company, its valuation, and discusses changes to the firm's
revenue/earnings model. (7-page report for purchase - $25)
http://www.multexinvestor.com/download.asp?docid=26037301&nd=0128

4. THIRD-PARTY REVIEW
Interfax updates investors on the latest Chinese technology
developments.

The report includes recent headline news, discussion of networks and
equipment, Internet and wireless technologies, hardware, software, stock
market developments and a profile of the Shandong Langchao Software
Co. (36-page report for purchase - $50)
http://www.multexinvestor.com/download.asp?docid=26088082&nd=0128

5. WHAT'S HOT?
RBC Capital Markets reports on possible bank unsecured credit
exposure to Kmart's (KM) bankruptcy.

In short order RBC identifies the banks and respective exposures to the
situation. Fleet (FBF), Bank of New York (BK), Morgan (JPM), Wachovia
(WB), Bank One (ONE), and Wells Fargo (WFC) are amongst 10 listed in
the report. (2-page report for purchase - $10)
http://www.multexinvestor.com/download.asp?docid=26063022&nd=0128

======================== Sponsored by =========================

The Telecomm Analyst: Wall Street's daily and weekly industry outlook

Multex's The Telecomm Analyst features daily telecommunications-industry
specific research highlights, investment ideas, analyst opinions, portfolio
strategies: http://www.multexinvestor.com/Analysts/HomeTTA.asp

To be sure you receive your TTA newsletter every week, click here:
http://www.multexinvestor.com/login.asp
==============================================================

Online advice and chats
-----------------------------------------

1. ASK THE ANALYST
Schaeffer's Research's Bernie Schaeffer discusses recent price action in
major market averages.

Calling latest trading activity "disturbing," Schaeffer explains why his
chart analysis reveals bearish indications. What are some key levels that
investors should watch in the Dow, Nasdaq, and S&P averages? You
can ask him questions through tonight, Mon., Jan. 28, 5 PM ET.
http://www.multexinvestor.com/AskTheAnalystForm.asp?&nd=0128

Twenty 100% profit winners in 2001. Try the nation's leading options
newsletter for ONE MONTH FREE!  No credit card required. BERNIE
SCHAEFFER'S OPTION ADVISOR. Click here
http://www.schaeffersresearch.com/redirect.asp?CODE=GB02A8&PAGE=1

2. ASK THE EXPERT
Ronald E. Newton with Insurance.com talks about how much auto
insurance you really need.

In reality, there is often a large gap between the insurance you're
required to carry and what you should carry.  Ask Ronald E. Newton of
Insurance.com your questions.  He will take investor questions until
Thurs., Feb. 7.
http://www.multexinvestor.com/AskTheExpertForm.asp?&nd=0128

Free and sponsored reports
-----------------------------------------

1, FREE RESEARCH REPORT
Wachovia Securities provides its 2002 outlook on real estate investment
trusts.

The firm provides key points, general discussion, fundamental drivers,
risk assignments, valuation drivers, plus 2 portfolio recommendations
with 12 suggested stocks. 8 tables. This 14-page report, which usually
sells for $50, is free to members for the next 72 hours.
http://www.multexinvestor.com/download.asp?docid=25975855&nd=0128

2. DAILY FREE SPONSOR REPORT
Morgan Stanley explains its "neutral-volatile" rating on Motorola (MOT).

The firm says MOT "has the ability to become the "Intel" of telecom
equipment," and lists key investment strengths and risks. Multex Investor
members can register for the firm's free-research trial to access research
on this and other stocks.
http://www.multexinvestor.com/download.asp?docid=4345572&sid=8&nd=0128

===================================================================
Please send your questions and comments to:
mailto:investor.help@multex.com

If you'd like to learn more about Multex Investor, please visit:
http://www.multexinvestor.com/welcome.asp

If you can't remember your password and/or your user name, click here:
http://www.multexinvestor.com/lostinfo.asp

If you want to update your email address, please click on the url below:
http://www.multexinvestor.com/edituinfo.asp
===================================================================

To remove yourself from the mailing list for the Daily Update, please
REPLY to THIS email message with the word UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject
line. To remove yourself from all Multex Investor mailings, including
the Daily Update and The Internet Analyst, please respond with the
words NO EMAIL in the subject line.

You may also unsubscribe on the account update page at:
http://www.multexinvestor.com/edituinfo.asp

===================================================================
Please email advertising inquiries to us at:
mailto:advertise@multex.com.

Be sure to check out our other newsletters, The Internet Analyst
and The Telecomm Analyst by Multex.com. The newsletters will
inform, educate, and entertain you with usable investment data,
ideas, experts, and info about the Internet and telecommunications
sectors. To see this week's issue,
click here:
http://www.thetelecommanalyst.com/ or
http://www.theinternetanalyst.com/


Barry,

When next week?  Bart

-----Original Message-----
From: Tycholiz, Barry [mailto:Barry.Tycholiz@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 11:06 AM
To: Bart Thedinger
Subject: RE: Producer Questionnaire from Mastio

Bart, Let's re-schedule meeting for some time next week. I have not
spent the time deserved for this survey and will do so once corporate
issues are resolved.

BT

-----Original Message-----
From: Bart Thedinger [mailto:bthedinger@mastio.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 2:54 PM
To: Tycholiz, Barry
Subject: Producer Questionnaire from Mastio

Barry,

Here is the questionnaire

I look forward to discussing this next week (Thursday, 8th at 2:00 pm).

Bart
_________________________
Bart Thedinger
Vice President, Senior Partner
Mastio & Company
802 Francis Street
St. Joseph, Mo. 64501-1916
Tel. 816.364.6200  Fax. 816.364.3606
website: http://www.mastio.com
services http://www.mastio.com/services.html
fields of expertise http://www.mastio.com/expertis.html

*This email and any files transmitted with it from Mastio & Company are
confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity
to
whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please
notify the sender. Thank you.

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Hoyt, Here is a privileged and confidential legal memorandum regarding the
Garden State modification of operations.  Let's discuss these issues tomorrow
or Friday.  Michelle

---------------------- Forwarded by Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT on 09/20/2000 09:50
PM ---------------------------

cpage@phks.com on 09/20/2000 01:04:55 PM
To: michelle.cash@enron.com, marty.blick@enron.com
cc: pmccarthy@phks.com
Subject: Patrick McCarthy Memo Regarding Thruway Recycling

Pat McCarthy asked me to forward the enclosed memo.

******************************************************************************
**
The information contained in this e-mail message, together with any
attachments
thereto, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the
addressee[s] named above.  The message and the attachments are or may be
an attorney-client or other privileged or protected communication.  If you are
not the intended recipient of this message, or authorized to receive it for
the
intended recipient, you have received this message in error. You are not to
review, use, disseminate, distribute or copy this message, any attachments
thereto, or their contents.  If you have received this message in error,
please
immediately notify us by return e-mail message, and delete the original
message.
This notice is included in all e-mail messages leaving our firm.  Thank you
for
your cooperation.
******************************************************************************
**

 - dhvg01!.DOC


For those that have not seen this analysis, attached please find a note from
Mary Schoen detailing the serious physical shortage problems that may occur
this Summer in CA.

Jim

----- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 02/26/2001 08:51 AM -----

	Mary Schoen
	02/22/2001 02:55 PM

		 To: Neil Bresnan/HOU/EES@EES, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jubran
Whalan/HOU/EES@EES, Kristin Walsh/HOU/ECT@ECT, Clayton Seigle/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jeffrey Keeler/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Janel
Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: CA Supply Realities

Attached is a memo comparing the CEC's forecasted supply and a more realistic
look at what additional resources might be available this summer.

The bottom line is that:

1.  The CEC significantly underestimates the outages that may occur this
summer.  They estimate in their 5,000 MW supply deficit for the summer that
expected outages will be around 3,000MW.  However, November and December saw
significantly higher outage levels.  (7,265 MWs) The FERC has investigated
these outages and found no improprieties- just that the plants are overtaxed
from running at higher than normal capacities.

2.  There are a lot of uncertainties surrounding the 1,244 MWs of projected
supply from rerating/restarting existing thermal and renewable projects.  It
is very unclear how much of this will be able to come on line by this summer,
if at all.  As evidenced by the e-mail I sent out this morning, local
communities may be very opposed to restarting shut down units.  In addition,
these units are likely to be uneconomical.

3.  In the existing resource pool, there are roughly 1,430 MWs of peaking or
other generation units that are running up against their operating hour
limitations from air quality regulations.  The Governor has ordered the local
air quality districts to address these restrictions,  We are beginning to
seem some movement; however, the US EPA has yet to weigh in on these relaxed
standards.

4.  The distributed generation/back-up generation capacity to make up some of
the shortfall is still an unknown.  While there has been some relaxing of the
limitations on run hours for back-up generation at "essential public
services" the increase in DG is expected from "clean" sources, not diesel
emergency generators.

5.  The CEC is doing everything it can to get 50+ MW peaking units on-line by
this summer.  They are promising a 21-day permit application approval process
and are offering to pay half of the cost of offsets, for "clean" sources of
generation in critical areas.

Please let me know if you have any questions or need additional information.

CEC's Summer Forecasted Peak Demand - Resource Balance:

List of Peakers running into their operating hour limitations:

Also available in hard copy format only:
(please e-mail me your fax number if you'd like a copy)

Table 1:  Fully Executed CA ISO Summer Reliability Agreements (the ISO
Peaking Facilities)
Table 2:  Summer 2001 Supply Options - Renewables Construction Status Summary
Table 3:  Summer 2001 Supply Options - Rerate of Non-CEC Projects
Table 4:  Summer 2001 Supply Options - CEC Rerate Status Summary
Table 5:  Idle Biomass Plants Potentially Capable of Restart
Mary Schoen
Environmental Strategies
Enron Corp
713-345-7422


Paul Leanza with Clinton may have a market for the Peoples Gas.  Dick wanted
me to talk to you to see if it sounds ok.  Give me a call when you get a
chance.


FYI,
I went to the team meeting and it really sounds like a lot of fun. Let Eric Johnson know by the first of next week if you are interested.

Jerry

Hello everyone!  We are looking to form a team (or teams) of Enron employees and spouses to participate in a new golf league, the inaugural season of the Corporate Team Golf Cup - Houston!

Some of you received this e-mail because you participated in the Enron-sponsored golf league in the past.  We thought you would be interested in joining us this season!    Please pass this on to other golfers you know within Enron that may not have received this e-mail.

The new league is sponsored by the Southern Texas PGA.  The purpose of the league is to create an environment for corporate personnel to network, interact, and build friendships and business relationships through a competitive and social golf program.

The league will include companies (teams) from the Houston area.  A few of the companies that have already committed to play are PWC, Reliant, Compaq, and Texaco.  Each team will have eight (8) players at each event and will compete once a month against another team.  The inaugural season will include six (6) monthly events plus a tournament for the finalists in November.

The deadline for entering our team(s) is coming up.  Please let me know if you are interested by Tuesday 3/19/02.  We will have a meeting later that week to answer questions and to sign everyone up.  Please don't hesitate to call or e-mail me should you have any questions.

I have also attached a flyer for you to pass on to people at other companies who may be interested in forming their own team.

Come join us -- we're looking forward to a great season!

Regards,
Eric Johnson
EBS Financial Operations -- ECS04815
Enron Wholesale Services
eric.johnson@enron.com <mailto:eric.johnson@enron.com>
Tel (713) 345-2659
Fax (713) 646-8425


Hi Bob,

Any info?

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/26/2001 09:27
AM ---------------------------

"Thompson, Peter J." <pthompson@akllp.com> on 03/26/2001 08:22:32 AM
To: "Kay Mann (E-mail)" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: GE Conference Call

   Has last week's conference call been rescheduled for today?   If
so, please let me know the time and the dial-in number.