Guys, keep the pressure on these guys; but, I think Adam is in a corner and
does not have a lot of flexibility.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 08/25/2000
08:59 AM ---------------------------

Adam Umanoff@ENRON
08/22/2000 06:59 PM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Indian Mesa

Thanks for the message.  I appreciate your responses to my August 8 memo and
agree that the deal you are currently proposing looks alot closer to the deal
we had been discussing with TXU.  As far as negotiating approach is
concerned, my intention was not to retrade our deal, but frankly your team's
approach up until your recent response certainly suggested that you were.  As
we considered our options, we used the time to scrub our economics and as I
think Jim Noles told you, have discovered that our economics have
deteriorated (significantly).  Not your fault/problem, but a real issue for
me.  I have my people looking at the deal again to see if we can offer some
creative suggestions to improve the deal for us (without killing you).  At
the end of the day, I want to do this deal; but I can't do an uneconomic
deal. By the way, the other parties who signed up with TXU all did so in the
$26-27.5 range (energy and RECs), suggesting that our deal for you is way
under market.  I am committed to pushing hard to get this deal done!  Let's
talk later this week once my team hooks up with yours to see if we have a way
forward.  Adam

David W Delainey@ECT
08/21/2000 09:49 AM
To: Adam Umanoff/EWC/Enron@ENRON
cc: Mark Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron, James L
Noles/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Indian Mesa

Adam, I believe that we have formally responded to all your issues as per
your memo to me of August 8, 2000. In all or almost all cases, we have
accepted your position.  The agreement should look and behave very closely to
what you would have signed with the competing utility. In addition, ENA is
paying a higher price, sharing credits and have voluntarily increased the
term to twelve years from ten.

I do not understand what is holding up completing this transaction other than
a complete re-trade on the original transaction. I hope this is not the
case.  The ENA team worked hard to facilitate this transaction for Enron
Wind.  In fact, we were originally solicited by Enron Wind to help build the
merchant wind market and we had to coax Enron Wind to do this transaction
with ENA versus TXU.

I look forward to finding a solution to this current impasse.

Regards
Delainey


Minor edits as shown.  Otherwise, looks good.

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	01/02/2001 04:20 PM

		 To: skean@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Advisory group bullets


Just a reminder:  The Industrial QBR is scheduled for Monday as follows:

   DATE:   8/14/00
   TIME:    1 PM - 4 PM
   PLACE:   EB 3321

Please mark your calendars for this meeting.


John:  when you receive your L1A visa at preflight inspection in Canada, I
will need a copy of the I-94 card that is stapled into your passport.  Please
be sure the red stamp comes out clearly on the copy to show the date of entry
into the US.

Please send to 3AC1787.

Thanks
Margaret x55083


When you send out your email list of counterparties can you please identify
the following counterparties whenthey are on the list as the present
particular legal problems:

1.  governmental entities
2.  hedge funds

Much thanks!


As a follow up to my message last week on charges for Analysts, I am
attaching the file that Financial Operations used to charge your RC with the
$6,400 in monthly costs that I detailed below.  I have received a few calls
and E-mails stating that some reclasses need to be made because you no longer
have an analyst in your group.  The information used by Financial Operations
to charge your RC was obtained from the Org Database.  Please review the
attached files for January and February to ensure that the proper RC was and
is going to be charged.  If you have any corrections, please contact Brian
Heinrich at Ext. 5-7677 ASAP since journal entries will need to be processed
by this Friday, March 3rd.

If you have any questions, please call me.  I just want to let everyone know
that it is important that we continue to keep the Org Database updated as
changes are made.  It is and will continue to be the source of headcount
information for Energy Operations.  Thank you for your continued support in
this process.

Lisa Cousino
x3-6343

--------------------- Forwarded by Lisa B Cousino/HOU/ECT on 03/01/2000 06:52
PM ---------------------------

Brian Heinrich
02/28/2000 01:44 PM
To: Lisa B Cousino/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: AA Headcount

Lisa,
This is the file we used for January, and the one for February.
Brian

Lisa B Cousino
02/24/2000 01:13 PM
To: Kristin Albrecht/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thresa A Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Evelyn
Aucoin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryce Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Theresa
T Brogan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diane H Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kathryn Cordes/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Lisa Csikos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer deBoisblanc
Denny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael Eiben/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas Engel/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Hunaid Engineer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Friedman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scotty Gilbert/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Carolyn Gilley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary G
Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna Greif/HOU/ECT@ECT, D Todd Hall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff
Harbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill D Hare/HOU/ECT@ect, Susan Harrison/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Brenda F Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carrie Hollomon/HOU/ECT@ect, John
Jacobsen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Klein/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Roy Lipsett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Mills/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael E
Moscoso/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary Nelson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Eugenio Perez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Pleus/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent A
Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dorothy Ricketts/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Stephen P Schwarz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Russ Severson/HOU/ECT@ECT, George
Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary M Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Solmonson/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jefferson D Sorenson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Martha Stevens/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert
Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Connie Sutton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward Terry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kim
S Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve
Venturatos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa White/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey W
White/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rita Wynne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Bennett Kaufman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly S Olinger/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laurel
Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, William Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Brian Heinrich/HOU/ECT@ect, Jennifer Blay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly
Perkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Angela Henn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marvia Jefferson/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Sandra R McNichols/HOU/ECT@ECT, Maria Sandoval/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alex
Saldana/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cecilia Olvera/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chantelle
Villanueva/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gretel Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Heather Choate/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Irena D Hogan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julissa Marron/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kelly
Templeton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lisa Shoemake/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lorraine
Becker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lynn Tippery/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ragayle Pellum/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Rosalinda Resendez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Yvette G Connevey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Patti
Thompson/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Monthly Charges for Analysts on your RC report

I wanted to let all of you know how you will be charged for Analysts if you
currently have or will have one in your RC for the year 2000.  The analyst
program is being handled differently than it was in 1999.  In addition to the
normal salary, benefits and payroll taxes, you will also be charged an
overhead administration fee for the program.  You will be charged the
following MONTHLY amounts for each analyst in the Detail Class code that I
have indicated below:

Detail Class  Description   Amount
      1  Salaries and Wages                   $4,000
        552  Benefits                         774
        557  Payroll Taxes                         360
        820  Corporate Services                      1,266
    Total MONTHLY Cost                   $6,400

The $4000 amount represents an average of all analyst salaries and does not
indicate what the analyst in your RC is paid.  This amount will not change in
February as the $4000 already includes merit raise information for 2000.

The $1266 represents the overhead costs of administering the program,
including campus recruiting and office visits.

When you look at your RC report, you will see a line item labeled  "A and A
Reclass" in each of the Detail Classes identified above.  Enron North America
is invoiced by Corp. for the costs of all analysts.  Financial Operations
makes a manual Journal Entry each month to charge the appropriate RC.  Please
check your January 2000 RC report and make sure you were properly charged for
the correct number of analysts you have currently.  If there are any errors,
please let me know as soon as possible so that I can work with Brian Heinrich
to have it corrected in February.  Please continue to check your RC report
each month going forward.  Thanks.

If you have any questions, please call me.

Lisa Cousino
x3-6343


Attached please find a revised First Amendments Agreement.  The only change
since yesterday's draft was to Exhibit A to include ECHO's notice address
before August 1, 2000 and on and after August  1, 2000.

 Are we now ready to begin execution?

Regards, NJD


Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 06/15/2000 03:19 PM -----

	Tanya Rohauer
	06/15/2000 01:58 PM

		 To: William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant
Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rod Nelson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tracy
Ngo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christopher Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Tudon/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Suttle/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Nidia Mendoza/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Radous/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Veronica
Espinoza/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lesli Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Molly
Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward Sacks/Corp/Enron@Enron, Brad
Schneider/Corp/Enron@Enron, Wendi LeBrocq/Corp/Enron@Enron, Veronica
Gonzalez/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara
Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: ISDA Credit Worksheet

Please begin using the new ISDA credit worksheet template attached for all
credit sent to the financial trading legal team.  I have added sections for
elegible swap participant and specified entity.  If you have any questions as
to how these new areas (or any of the old areas) are to be filled in, I will
be happy to walk you through it.

Thanks,
Tanya


"Plan B"
As folks know, there's a group of moderate Democrats in the CA Assembly that
has been working on a "Plan B."
They've been working on it because they're not satisfied with the Governor's
MOU with Edison.
The Plan B group has been talking to a broad array of stakeholders, including
Republicans, to get input into how "Plan B" can improve upon the MOU.
First the good news about Plan B:  a fairly bright group of legislators is
rolling up its sleeves and attempting to come up with a centrist solution to
the problem, and they're at least creating the appearance of trying to be
bi-partison about it.  (There is at least one idea in Plan B that is
attributable to a Republican--Keith Richman--that Ken Lay met with a couple
of weeks ago.) So the beginnings of a process to resolve California's crisis
may be emerging.
Now the bad news:  because they are trying to build a consensus, Plan B is a
mish-mash, isn't focused, includes some pretty bad ideas, excludes some good
ideas (like re-establishing Direct Access immediately), and is going to
require a lot more work to get right.
Update on Efforts to Achieve a Settlement
In the meeting with the suppliers that Steve Kean and I participated in
yesterday, one of the financial consultants hired by the Governor criticized
several of the Plan B proposals as unworkable.
On today's call with the Governor's staff and suppliers it became somewhat
apparent that the Governor isn't going drive a resolution, but will leave it
to the Legislature to take the lead role.
The staff emphasized repeatedly that the lawsuits, investigations, etc. were
not on the table for discussion in any global settlement talks, and that
attempting to bring them in to the negotiations was a nonstarter.
Instead, the Governor's staff said that the group should focus on the size of
the discount that suppliers would be willing to take.
The suppliers pushed back, stating that including haircuts in the talks while
excluding the lawsuits, investigations, etc. is one-sided and unworkable.
The staff urged the group to begin negotiations with the Legislature, but
made it fairly clear that the Governor would not be the one to pull the
necessary principals together in a room to hammer out a solution; his staff
implied instead that it's up to others, i.e., the suppliers, to get the
process of negotiations underway.
Next Steps
If the Governor's financial consultants are prepared by Friday, they will
brief suppliers on the ways in which the administration is attempting to
resolve the State's creditworthiness issue to encourage suppliers to do power
deals with CDWR.  It they are not ready by Friday, the suppliers will meet
separately to discuss next steps.
Finally, there's been some confusion.  My apologies.
Sandi faxed to Jim and Harry yesterday a copy of "Plan B."  Sandi mentioned
that the Governor gave the Plan B group an analysis of the Plan.  For those
that have a copy of Plan B, see the 10-page memo dated May 12th, attached to
the back of the Plan.  The memo is from Joe Fichera to John Dutra, Fred
Keeley and Joe Nation (3 of the Plan B Democratic legislators).  Joe Fichera
is the head of Saber Partners, a financial consulting group that the Governor
hired to advise him on the crisis.
If anyone has not yet received a copy of Plan B, please let me know and I'll
get it to you.

Best,
Jeff


Hello Kay,

Steve Plauche asked me to send you a copy of the current agreement with ENA
cited in the work order request for the Connecticut project.  You will note
the agreement expires at the end of this month.  Please fax the signed work
order to my attention at 978 266-4098 today as Steve has directed us to
begin work immediately and attend a meeting tomorrow.  Also, it would be a
great help if you could provide a letter extending the term of the agreement
to October 2001.  Please call me if you have any questions.

Joe Curreri
Vice President
Power Generation Services
35 Nagog Park
Acton, MA 01720
phone:   978 635-9500 ext 3161
fax:       978 266-4098
e-mail:  jcurreri@ensr.com

 <<ENA Consulting Services Agreement.pdf>>

**********************************************************************
The information contained in this communication is confidential and
privileged proprietary information intended only for the individual
or entity to whom it is addressed.  Any unauthorized use, distribution,
copying or disclosure of this communication is prohibited.
If you have received this communication in error, please contact the
sender immediately.

It is our policy that e-mails are intended for and should be used for
business purposes only.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

ENSR
www.ensr.com
postmaster@ensr.com
**********************************************************************

 - ENA Consulting Services Agreement.pdf


You have received this email because you are listed as a data approver. Please click http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000082069&Page=Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000082069
Request Create Date : 1/31/02 1:12:41 PM
Requested For       : kulvinder.fowler@enron.com
Resource Name       : Sitara Houston Production Central Edit Risk Analytics
Resource Type       : Applications


TODAY: VA Linux suffers, Agile dumps Ariba
merger and more. Read on.

================= Advertisement ================
THE NASDAQ SLUMP HAS CREATED NEW $1,000,000 OPPORTUNITIES.

FREE Report reveals THREE TECH STOCKS THAT ARE POISED TO BECOME THE NEXT
MICROSOFT, CISCO or INTEL. Now is your chance to pick up a few bargains that
can double, triple even quadruple your money.  Get your FREE Report now!

http://www.BullMarket.com/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?multex2
------------------------------------------------

Featured article this week:
The Sell Report:
VA Linux Systems: The Income Statement As Horror Movie.
VA Linux Systems (LNUX) reported operating results
on May 21, and perhaps now everyone can see why it
was the subject of the Sell Report on March 1. At
the time, I criticized management for not truly
understanding the weakness in the current market.
Click here
http://www.theinternetanalyst.com/individual/010531sections/sellreport.asp

Click Here to go directly to the website.
http://www.theinternetanalyst.com/default.asp

OR go to AOL Keyword Internet Analyst

OR Click Here to download the PDF of issue #114
http://www.theinternetanalyst.com/pdfversions/010531tianl.pdf

OR Download TIA to your PDA at
http://avantgo.com/channels/detail.html?cha_id=2502

E-mail your feedback to The Internet Analyst
at mailto:tia@multex.com

Scroll down and click links below to
go right to a specific article:

Strong Buys:
Accounting Issues Aplenty
Click here
http://www.theinternetanalyst.com/individual/010531sections/strongbuys.asp

================= Advertisement ================

Thinking of refinancing your home?
Visit Multex Investors Personal Finance Channel. Well give you
expert advice on mortgages, insurance, and your most pressing
questions. Top-notch information, commentary, and tools -- FREE.
http://www.multexpf.com?mktg=tapftx3

------------------------------------------------

The Sell Report:
VA Linux Systems: The Income Statement As Horror Movie.
Click here
http://www.theinternetanalyst.com/individual/010531sections/sellreport.asp

Upgrades & Downgrades:
Riverstone Still Looks Good Despite Downgrade.
Click here
http://www.theinternetanalyst.com/individual/010531sections/updown.asp

Executives Zero In:
Co-Founder and CEO of Centillium Communications
Discusses Conquering The Japanese Market.
Click here
http://www.theinternetanalyst.com/individual/010531sections/zeroin.asp

The Real Deal:
The Bulls And The Hyenas
Click here
http://www.theinternetanalyst.com/individual/010531sections/realdeal.asp

================= Advertisement ================

Take charge of your financial future. Open a new Ameritrade
account and get commission-free trades for 1 month. Plus, youll
also get 24/7 customer service, e-mail alerts, free research, and
more. Why wait? Visit www.ameritrade.com
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;2868210;5677087;s?http://www.ameritrade.com/o.cgi?a=dev&o=rjm&p=/html/25mf.fhtml
------------------------------------------------

Venture Capital:
Analyzing the Five-Tool Company, Part II
Click here
http://www.theinternetanalyst.com/individual/010531sections/venture.asp

The Analyst's Spotlight:
Sanders Morris Harris Analyst Talks About
Why Agile Software Aborted Its Merger
With Ariba.
Click here
http://www.theinternetanalyst.com/individual/010531sections/spotlight.asp

IPO Update:
May Brings Sense of Stability in IPO Market
Click here
http://www.theinternetanalyst.com/individual/010531sections/ipoupdate.asp

Rants & Raves:
Why After The Bull Market, The Bear Returns
Click here
http://www.theinternetanalyst.com/individual/010531sections/rantrave.asp

Letters:
Busted!
For Aram
A Special Note
Click here
http://www.theinternetanalyst.com/individual/010531sections/rantrave.asp

RESEARCH REPORT SPOTLIGHT:
Microsoft (MSFT): CIBC World Markets examines Microsoft's
next foray off the desktop: the X-Box. The firm does not expect
the product to be beneficial to the bottom line. Find out
what they think the product will do in their report
which is available for $10, at the URL below.
Click here
http://www.multexinvestor.com/AF001215/download.asp?docid=20693753&ticker=msft

Put in your two cents worth on the Internet
issues that interest you on The Internet Analyst's
message boards.
http://www.sageonline.com/boards/user/non-frames/list.asp?forumid=20210

Like a specific article? Now you can send it
to a friend with just a click. Check out the
send to a friend feature next to each article.

For article reprints, e-mail mailto:lopkine@multex.com

To advertise in this e-mail, ASK FOR TIA at mailto:advertise@multex.com

If you do not wish to receive further issues of The Internet
Analyst, please click on the REPLY button on your email
software, and reply to THIS e-mail message with the word
UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line.


Gentlemen:

Thought Don Deline's report would be of interest to you.  He plans on doing a
report daily.  The demonstrators are out in force this morning and we plan to
stay as far away from them as possible.

Joe Hillings

---------------------- Forwarded by Lora Sullivan/Corp/Enron on 11/30/99
11:53 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Chris Long                           11/29/99 08:29 PM

To: Lora Sullivan/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: WTO Notes

INSIDE (AND OUTSIDE) THE WTO

 The World Trade Organization (WTO) Ministerial meeting began yesterday in
Seattle ) well, almost.  An event scheduled for Monday was delayed for four
hours because of a breach of security. The official opening will not occur
until today but the &behind the scenes8 meetings and negotiations began
Monday November 29th and will continue until December 3rd.  In reality, there
are two events going on.  One is a circus / media event taking place in the
streets of Seattle and the second is the serious trade negotiations going on
between the trade ministers of 135 countries.  There are many important
people appearing this week to include President Clinton.  Even Fiedel Castro
has been invited to speak at the University of Washington which is located
less than a mile from the WTO activities.
 The circus events in the street are designed to sever the communications
between world trade officials and the rest of the world.  While it has its
comic side, its basic aim is anything but funny.  If the true story of trade
cannot be told, the only view that the world gets of the WTO is that it is an
event not to be taken seriously.  The street events are sort of like the
shell on an egg.  They prevent you from seeing the egg itself but the shell
is not the substance of the egg.
 In an attempt to make certain the media events in the street do not succeed
as far as Halliburton is concerned, I will attempt to give you a fair and
balanced account of what is really going on for the next four days.  This is
truly an interesting ministerial round of negotiations in that even Seattle
can,t seem to get a grip on what they stand for.  They bid on and won the
right to host the WTO this year and it will mean millions in income for the
city.  There are signs along the streets welcoming the WTO.  At the same
time, the city of Seattle and the country it is located in, are heavily pro
union and they are sponsoring a huge &anti-WTO8 rally.  They have granted
permits for anti-WTO parades on busy streets during rush hours which makes
many downtown workers less than happy.  These workers then vent their
frustration against the WTO for causing the streets to be blocked.  Life in
Seattle can best be described as &schizophrenic.8
INSIDE THE WTO
 Here is the &inside Story8.  From November 30th to December 3rd, most of the
world,s trade representatives are meeting in Seattle in private.  Meetings
will not be in the open for fear of disruption.  Demonstrators then use this
fact to say the talks are secrete because they are really all about world
dominance.  The truth is that the trade ministers will be reviewing the
global trading system and attempting to insure its dynamism and
responsiveness in the years to come.  Talks actually began in Geneva earlier
this year but the formal meetings to reach agreement will be this week.
 For 50 years, the WTO ) formally known as the GATT for &General Agreement on
Tariffs and Trade8 has attempted to open world trade markets and set
predictable and stable rules for trade.  During this 50 year period, there
has been an 18 fold growth in international trade.  This was a reversal of
what is now widely recognized as disastrous policies of the 1930s when
increased trade barriers, discrimination among trading partners, and an
absence of agreed rules helped fuel the Great Depression.
 The beginning of this ministerial round finds some important issues to be
resolved in order to eliminate barriers that currently inhibit trade.  The
largest barrier is agriculture because European and Japanese farmers are
heavily subsidized so that they can compete with the United States.  The
United States Trade Representative (USTR) office listed seven other issues of
concern to be discussed and agree upon during the negotiations.  Most
important to Halliburton is the issue of services.  Our company performs
energy services all over the world but the WTO has never looked at trade
barriers in the energy services area.  The USTR representative present at the
kickoff meeting on Monday morning was asked if energy services were being
discussed in this round and she assured us that it would be a significant
part of the new negotiations.  The USTR is hopeful that this week will end
with agreements between all parties as to the issues to be resolved over the
next three years and they are confident of success.
OUTSIDE THE WTO
 A small band of demonstrators, most dressed like skeletons, animals, and
turtles, took to the streets on Sunday November 28th for a preview of things
to come.  They demonstrated in front of the GAP clothing store downtown.  (A
number of the demonstrators were seen to be wearing GAP jeans and jackets
under their skeleton suits).  They were demonstrating against GAP,s use of
&slave labor.8  Street interviews indicated that no one was to articulate
about where these slaves were.  The crowd of about 200 was well organized, if
uninformed, and moved to an abandon warehouse where they broke into the
building in order to occupy it.  Police did not attempt to eject them ) they
simply cut of the power and water to this old, concrete, damp, and cold
building.  In addition, homeless people through out Seattle were moved during
the weekend for the duration of the WTO in order to allow demonstrators the
opportunity to occupy their places on the streets.  It seems many of the
demonstrators had neglected to make reservations elsewhere.  Rain is expected
Tuesday and Wednesday which should add to the demonstrators woes.
 Seattle morning news carried a very level broadcast listing the
environmental and labor demands of the demonstrators and also relating the
fact that $42 billion in trade is done by Washington each year.  $258 million
in grain alone was sold to Japan during 1998.  Somewhere in excess of 1/3 of
Washington,s economy is based on foreign trade and they are now the third
largest trading state behind California and Texas.  This all adds to the
schizophrenia that is beginning to be known as Seattle.


Peter,

Please see the attached.  This is intended to clarify a few points .
Please let me know if it is acceptable to Wachovia.

Thanks,
Drew Clark

(See attached file: EnronRetentionTrustAPPENDIXD(Version3).doc)

**********NOTE**********
The information contained in this email message is intended only
for use of the individual or entity named above.  If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or
agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you
have received this communication in error, please immediately
notify us by telephone (212-310-8000), and destroy the original
message. Thank you.

 - EnronRetentionTrustAPPENDIXD(Version3).doc


I'm playing.  I will be in the office at 5:30 for a quick meeting, but I will join you after that.
-----Original Message-----
From: Jason.Wolfe@enron.com
To: John.Dunn@enform.com; Allan.Elliott@enform.com; Michael.Cherry@enform.com; Matt.Sample@enform.com; Beth.Cherry@enform.com
Cc: JWilkerson@reliant.com
Sent: 11/13/2001 4:47 PM
Subject: RE: Do we play today?
Who is playing, and when should we start? Get back at me so I will know
when to show up.
Thanks,
DJ
    -----Original Message-----
   From:   "Dunn, John" <John.Dunn@enform.com>@ENRON
   Sent:   Tuesday, November 13, 2001 11:43 AM
   To:     Elliott, Allan; Cherry, Michael; Sample, Matt; Cherry, Beth;
             Wolfe, Jason
   Cc:     ''''''''Jondaworky (JWilkerson@reliant.com) ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
   Subject:  RE: Do we play today?
   I'm going to shave my team name in the back of my mullet.
   -----Original Message-----
   From: Elliott, Allan
   To: Cherry, Michael; Sample, Matt; Cherry, Beth; Dunn, John;
   '''''''''''''Jason.Wolfe@ENRON.com' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
   Cc: '''''''Jondaworky (JWilkerson@reliant.com) ' ' ' ' ' ' '
   Sent: 11/13/2001 11:35 AM
   Subject: RE: Do we play today?
   Ack!! Trying to catch up here after several days of vacation.  Quite
a
   meandering collection of emails.  You should get your tee shirts and
why
   not go the whole 9 yards and get custom license plates... take pride
in
   your losing streak!!  Unfortunately I don't think I can make the game
   tonight, but Thursday or Friday for an xbox demo would be cool.
   IT Traveler
**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient
(or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender
or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and
delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments
hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not
create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron
Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other
party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by
estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


You can come down  to EB305 and pick up your packages to start parking at the
new garage on MONDAY, APRIL 9th. There will be a table set-up across from the
front desk, be prepared to show your Enron I.D. badge.

Please make sure that you bring your Allen Center/MET card with you, you will
not get a package without your present parking card. Everyone must pick up
his/her own package.


---------------------- Forwarded by Darrell Schoolcraft/ET&S/Enron on 06/04/2001 12:46 PM ---------------------------

Richard Hanagriff
06/04/2001 12:14 PM
To:	ET&S Gas Controllers, Lynn Blair/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rick Dietz/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, John Buchanan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Terry Kowalke/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Cynthia Rivers/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Linda Ward/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Amy Mulligan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Albert Hernandez/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Beverly Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lorraine Lindberg/ET&S/Enron, TK Lohman/ET&S/Enron, Darrell Schoolcraft/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Tracy Minter/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Christine McEvoy/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Lindy Donoho/ET&S/Enron, Michelle Lokay/ET&S/Enron, Kimberly Watson/ET&S/Enron, Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron, ET&S Gas Controllers
cc:

Subject:	TW imbals as of 5/31


Please find attached Credit's EOL responses for 3/3/00.

Regards
Molly


Thanks.

Vince

Stinson Gibner
04/16/2001 04:47 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: recommendation of an outstanding Baylor MBA student for summer
internship

I have talked twice to Althea.  Once last week and once after your email this
morning.  She has told me both times that she would arrange with Shirley to
put Rusty on your schedule and on mine.

--Stinson

Vince J Kaminski
04/16/2001 04:19 PM
To: Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: recommendation of an outstanding Baylor MBA student for summer
internship

Stinson,

A reminder.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/16/2001
04:19 PM ---------------------------

Vince J Kaminski
03/31/2001 10:17 AM
To: Jim Garven <James_Garven@baylor.edu> @ ENRON
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stinson
Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: recommendation of an outstanding Baylor MBA student for summer
internship

Jim,

I shall contact Althea and make sure Rusty meets with the Research Group
members.

Vince

Jim Garven <James_Garven@baylor.edu> on 03/28/2001 01:01:42 PM
To: Stinson_Gibner@enron.com
cc: vince_j_kaminski@enron.com
Subject: recommendation of an outstanding Baylor MBA student for summer
internship

Dear Stinson,

I would like to call your attention to Rusty Parks, who is an MBA student
here and has been serving as my research assistant since last fall.? Rusty is
a very outstanding individual with a very impressive work ethic and interest
in topics such as financial engineering and technology, particularly as these
issues pertain to the energy industry.?? In fact, you met Rusty during your
recent visit to Baylor (specifically, last month over dinner at the Gamma
Iota Sigma chartering  ceremony).

I happen to know that Rusty is already scheduled to visit Enron for an
interview for a summer internship on April 19.? He has been invited by Althea
Gordon.? If there is any possibility that you could meet with him during his
visit, I am sure that he would be most grateful.?  Rusty is one of the very
best research assistants I have ever had, and I am sure that Enron would
benefit from having him aboard during the coming summer.

Sincerely,

Jim Garven

P.S.: Please find Rusty's resume attached to this email.

_________________________________________
James R. Garven, Ph.D.
Professor of Finance & Insurance
Department of Finance, Insurance and Real Estate
Hankamer School of Business
HSB 336
Baylor University
Box 98004
Waco, TX? 76798

Voice: (254) 710-6207
Fax: (603) 994-6680

E-mail: James_Garven@baylor.edu
Home Page: http://garven.baylor.edu
Vita: http://garven.baylor.edu/dossier.html
Research Paper Archive: http://garven.baylor.edu/research.html
_________________________________________
 - Rusty Parks Resume.doc


---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 03/06/2000
09:51 AM ---------------------------

E*TRADE <member@etrade.0mm.com> on 03/03/2000 05:37:43 PM
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: You have a special E*TRADE IRA kit coming...

Dear SHACKLETON:

Don't miss the April 17th IRA deadline! Watch the U.S. mail
this week for your free E*TRADE IRA Express Application.
It only takes about three minutes to apply, and our IRA
team is available 24 hours a day to answer your questions.

Sincerely,

Suzi White
Vice President, Service Quality

P.S. Get a FREE copy of Quicken(R) TurboTax(R) Deluxe,
E*TRADE Edition, when you open your no-fee E*TRADE IRA!(1)

____________________________________________________________

You received this e-mail because you registered at
www.etrade.com or on one of our partners' sites. To protect
your online privacy, we do not rent or sell your e-mail
address to third parties. If you wish to be removed from
our list:

- Click the e-mail reply button.
- Type the word "remove" in the subject line.
- Click on the send e-mail button.
Your e-mail address will be removed from the E*TRADE e-mail
list. We will confirm your request by e-mail.
____________________________________________________________

(1) The material available through this offer, including the
TurboTax software, has been produced by independent
providers that are not affiliated with E*TRADE. E*TRADE
GIVES NO EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES (INCLUDING BUT NOT
LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A
PARTICULAR USE) WITH RESPECT TO THE TURBOTAX SOFTWARE OR
OTHER MATERIALS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS OFFER. The existence
of the offer and the information provided herein is not to
be considered a recommendation or endorsement by E*TRADE,
and E*TRADE accepts no liability for any direct or
consequential loss arising from any use of this information
or its contents. E*TRADE does not provide any legal, tax,
or accounting advice. Limit one nontransferable new account
bonus per person. E*TRADE reserves the right to terminate
this offer at any time. Not valid with any other offer.
Other terms apply.

System response times may vary due to a variety of factors,
including trading volumes, market conditions, and system performance.

The services described herein are available to U.S.
residents only. Copyright 2000 E*TRADE Securities, Inc.
All rights reserved. Member NASD/SIPC. E*TRADE is a
registered trademark of E*TRADE Securities, Inc. All other
trademarks mentioned herein are the property of their
respective owners.

This message was sent to sshackl@ect.enron.com


Harry.  Tamara is finishing a model that give impact according to rate
design.

It is far more difficult to model the effects of behaviour change that will
ocur with higher prices in the summer.  I spoke with David Roberts (EAM) and
ran this structure by him and he is of the same opinion as I that:
Very high rates from 12noon to 6PM do not encourage DSM because:
The risk of installing capital in time for June,July, Aug, Sep is significant
when the timing is short and each month lost decreases the value of the
investment by 1/4
Very high rates from 12noon to 6PM will result in behaviour changes by
changing behaviour more than DSM.  ie.  They will turn up the temperature for
these hours.
Very high rates for 12noon to 6PM encourage curtailment activities but not as
much load shifting.  ie a 2 part rate would encourage doing your annual plant
turnaround in Aug ($250/MWh signal) more than the CPUC proposal for August
($110/MWh signal).
Very high rates starting in June, would be difficult to optimize, given the
lack of certainty today about whether the rates will be pasted and the short
lead time.

The rate design I have proposed below gives large price signals in the summer
and the winter, than those proposed by CPUC, while lessening the impact to
Enron tariff book.

Price Signals Comparison

	Summer
	(PGE=Jun-Oct, SCE=May-Sep)	Summer 	Winter	Winter
CPUC Proposal	On Peak - 12noon to 6PM WD	Off  Peak 	On Peak	Off Peak
       PGE E19 Secondary	$370/MWh	$75/MWh	$75/MWh	$75/MWh
       SCE TOU 8 Secondary	$145/MWh	$122/MWh	$122/MWh	$122/MWh
2 Part RTP Proposal
       PGE E19 Secondary	$290/MWh based on Apr 1 NP15	$150/MWh based on Apr 1 NP15	$180/MWh based
on Q4 Apr 1 NP15	$131/MWh based on Q4  Apr 1 NP15
       SCE TOU 8 Secondary	$157/MWh based on Apr 1 SP15	$122/MWh	$156/MWh based on Q4 Apr 1
NP15	$98/MWh

Lets see if we can get together with the DSM people today.

Scott

From: Harry Kingerski@ENRON on 04/03/2001 07:40 AM
To: Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Don Black/HOU/EES@EES, James W Lewis/HOU/EES@EES, Tamara
Johnson/HOU/EES@EES, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: Draft Testimony re PGE/SCE for Discussion

I still think it is imperative that we use our book position, by rate
schedule and time period (on-peak, off-peak) , to quantify the sensitivity to
different types of rate designs.  For instance, if there is a large increase
in summer on-peak, how much of the increase can we avoid with aggressive DSM,
etc.  Can we look at this quantification today?

	Scott Stoness@EES
	04/02/2001 09:34 PM

		 To: James W Lewis/HOU/EES@EES
		 cc: Don Black, Tamara Johnson/HOU/EES@EES, harry kingerski
		 Subject: Draft Testimony re PGE/SCE for Discussion

Harry and I are meeting tomorrow.  I would like any feedback you have related
to the following:

Based on our position we would prefer:
Later surcharges
Lower surcharges
Surcharges that are lower in the summer (flatter is better because it is
closer, the NPV effects and our rapidly diminishing position)

The proposal below could either result in:
Delay of a month while they consider this complicated affair (low likelihood)
Lower surcharge if we can convince people that market rates are $300/MWh for
a year when they are actually $200.  We would only get a $20/MWh increase, as
compared to a $30/MWh increase.  ie (1-90%) times $300/MWh yields $30/MWh is
our story when the actural is (1-90%)times $200/MWh yields $20/MWh.
The Enron rates below are effectively much flatter than the CPUC proposal.
Thus we would be better off if accepted.
Additionally if our noise causes a flat $30/MWh increase to replace the CPUC
proposal, we are better off.

Additionally,
we could sell hedging on the 10% exposed to markets.
DSM related to capital investments should be less risky.

The risks to Enron are:
Proposal makes it easy to hit the large customers with a lower baseline (ie
75% instead of 90%)
Would make DSM more risky.  DSM providers would have to buy hedges to proceed.

The questions to answer are:
Could Enron provide witnesses without drawing more negatives
Would a partner tow the Enron line
---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Stoness/HOU/EES on 04/02/2001 09:22
PM ---------------------------

Scott Stoness
04/02/2001 09:21 PM
To: Tamara Johnson/HOU/EES@EES
cc: harry kingerski
Subject: Draft Testimony re PGE/SCE for Discussion

Summary:
The CPUC should implement two part RTP/TOU rates for PGE/SCE.  A two part
rate is a rate where customers pay their historical rate for consumption of
normal load and pay market value for consumption incremental (or decremental)
to normal load.
The CPUC should define normal consumption as consumption over and above 90%
of historical 2000 consumption.
The CPUC should define the hourly rate as the highest hourly price paid by
DWR for spot purchases in that hour.
In the event that implementation of two part RTP/TOU rates is complicated to
design, the $30/MWh surcharge should be applied to all customers until the
implementation of two part RTP/TOU rates is possible.
The current draft design, of the CPUC, is discriminatory to large customers.
The current draft design, of the CPUC, does not provide appropriate price
signals.
The current draft design, of the CPUC, results in rate increases to large
customers that are unneccessarly high.
The current draft design, of the CPUC, results in rate increases to large
customers, that are far in excess of those which the CPUC intended.
The current draft design, of the CPUC, results is static and does not respond
to changing market conditions.

Design Goals:
The CPUC should design rates that:
Give appropriate price signals to customers to consume / conserve energy as
as close to marginal price as possible in as many hours as possible.
Treat all rate classes in a fair and consistent manner.
Achieve targeted revenue requirements.
Are easy to administer and understand.

Summary of CPUC Illustrative Design:
The CPUC has proposed rates that move on peak pricing in the summer close to
marginal rates:
Draft proposal provides marginal price signal of about $370/MWh for E19
Secondary from in Summer Weekdays from noon to 6PM
Draft proposal provides marginal price signal of about $75/MWh for E19
Secondary from in all other hours.
Critique based on Design Goals:
Draft proposals move toward marginal rates but fall short.
The rates for power, Mar 30 2001, based on DJ-NP15, on peak is $181.94/MWh.
The rates for power, Mar 30 2001, based on DJ-NP15, off peak is $93.46/MWh.
The proposed marginal rates for E19 Secondary, is $75/MWh for on peak and off
peak.
This rate design will not encourage investments in assets that result in
lower consumption in the winter or in off peak periods.
 Draft proposal falls short on treating customers on a consistent basis:
E20 Transmission Voltage customers will experience a 87% rate increase.
E19 Secondary voltage customers will experience a 41% rate increase.
A10 Medium General Service customers will experience a 20% rate increase.
A1 Small L&P customers will experience a 16% rate increase.
The marginal price signal for A10 will be $121/MWh vs $370/MWh for E-20
transmission in the on peak summer.
The marginal price signal for E10 wills be 107/MWh vs $55/MWh for E-20
transmission in the off peak periods.
PGE has a longer summer period than SCE.  This results in a 69% increase for
SCE TOU-8-Sub as compared to 87% increases for PGE E20 Transmission rate.
The proposal also results in far different marginal price signals for SCE
customers than PGE customers.  For example the on peak rate for SCE TOU-8-Sub
is $128/MWh as compared to PGE E20 Transmission rate of $374/MWh.
Draft proposal does do a good job of recovering $2.2b of revenue.
Draft proposal require some implementation but given that the surcharge
increase does not ocur until May for PGE and June for SCE, it should be
possible to implement.

Enron Proposed Rates:
Enron proposes:
Two part real time pricing time of use rate,
Usage up to 90% of historical use would be billed at historical rates.
Usage incremental or decremental to 90% of historical use, would be billed at
DJ-NP15 On Peak and DJ-NP15 Off Peak, where customers has real time metering.
Usage incremental or decremental to 90% of historical use, would be billed at
DJ-NP15 On Peak and DJ-NP15 Off Peak averaged over the month, where customers
has time of use metering.
Usage incremental or decremental to 90% of historical use, would be billed at
45% of DJ-NP15 On Peak and 55% of DJ-NP15 Off Peak averaged over the month,
where customers has just energy metering.
Critique based on Design Goals:
Enron proposals charge all customer at very close  to marginal rates.
Thus, within the constraints of using Dow Jones, the rates should be very
close to the actual marginal rates.
The rates will not be exact because they are:
Determined on the previous day
Ony differentiate between on and off peak, as compared to hour by hour.
To the extent that the customer does not have real time metering capability,
the rates will be determined on a class average basis.
However, the rates be far superior to the CPUC draft design because:
They give better price signals to night consumption
They give better signals to weekend consumption
They give better signals to winter consumption
They are self correcting in that they do not require predetermination of
marginal costs.  For example, if summer costs are lower, the rate will be
lower.
The Enron proposal will motivate DSM activities in winter, summer and off
peak.
Enron proposal results in similar rate structure and impact regardless of
utility and rate class.
The Enron proposal results in a similar concept for commerical and industrial
as with residential.  AB1X provides that residential customers that consume
energy below normal rates will not have increased rates.  This design also
achieves the same effect for commercial and industrial customers.
Draft proposal does do a good job of recovering $2.2b of revenue but even
more importantly it ensures tracking of costs.
Setting the normal load at 90% of historical load results in a $30/MWh
increase if the market value for the entire year is $300/MWh.
In the event that the market value for the entire year is less than $300/MWh,
the resulting cost decreases will offset the lost revenue.
The Enron proposed rate design structure is flexi ble enough that it can
easily be changed to achieve greater or lessor revenue to achieve price
signals and revenue targets.
The revenue outcome is less certain than the CPUC draft design however the
impact should be more certain because the revenue will automatically go up
when the costs go up.
Draft proposal require greater implementation details than the CPUC design
but such extra costs are worthwhile.
The Enron proposal requires:
Determination of historical loads for large customers
Determination of class consumption profiles for demand metered customers
Determination of class consumption profiles for energy metered customers
Determination of customer profiles in the event that the customers is a new
customer
Then Enron proposal has the following negatives:
Some customers who have reduced load from historical levels will be better
off even though they have not changed their behaviour in response to the new
price signals
The rates will require greater administrative costs since they are different
for each customer.
The rates may take more work to put in place for the utility
The rates will result in similar customers paying dissimilar rates, depending
upon the historical consumption of the customers

Q.  In the event that it is not possible to implement the Enron rates by June
1, 2001, what would you propose a an interim solution:
A.  The CPUC draft rates are so flawed, that it would be superior to just
implement a flat $30/MWh surcharge to all customers.  This approach would be
fairer and simpler.

Q.  Who would pay for the decremental consumption of customers?
A.  The DWR will incur a decline in their costs equal to the decrease in
rates of the utilities.  The are indifferent to buy more generation or
selling less energy to customers.  Thus the DWR should be willing to pay for
decremental consumption.  In the event that the DWR is not agreeable to
paying for decremental consumption, the utility should be allowed to borrow
such funds and have the costs amortized for the next 10 years.  In the event
that the utility is unable to fund decremental consumption, the normal load
could be defined 85% of historical and the CPUC could eliminate credits
resulting from decremental consumption.  Such solution would discourage
conservation below 15% but would not be expected to diminish the
effectiveness of the Enron proposed rates.

Q.  Why is DJ-NP15 the right index to choose?
A.  DJ-NP15 and DJ-SP15 are availble for each weekday for on and off peak
pricing.  The index is a mathematical average of trades in the previous day
for today.  The DJ index is compiled based on the information provided by
many of the large trading companies including Enron.  The numbers provided by
the participants are subject to audit.  Thus DJ is the best avaible
information available for energy pricing.

Q.  What index is suitable for weekends?
A. Enron proposes that the average DJ-NP15 off peak energy charges for friday
and monday be used to determine the weekend rates for the purpose of rate
setting.


The following expense report is ready for approval:

Employee Name: Shelley A. Corman
Status last changed by:  Automated Administrator
Expense Report Name: Key Ex
Report Total: $3,203.82
Amount Due Employee: $3,203.82

To approve this expense report, click on the following link for Concur
Expense.
http://xms.enron.com


I don't see anything technically wrong with the document, but I struggle to
see the point of it.  Most people are not going to care about our industry's
problem; they are going to be interested in solutions.  We should be telling
them what the answer is -- eg forward prices are lower; there is an
opportunity to buy forward now and protect yourself from volatility; etc.
What do you think?

	Peggy Mahoney@EES
	11/28/2000 05:27 PM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: natural gas

Can you please review?  We'd like to send as an informational
piece to our California customers.   Prices are up to $14 today
and not expected to drop anytime soon.  We're using this letter
and follow-up calls to try to curtail load.  I can explain further if
needed.


Effective with the November 15 payday, electronic viewing and printing of
your direct deposit advice will be available on eHRonline.  This new
feature allows you to view your pay information at a time convenient for
you.  Later this year, you will be able to view this information from your
home on your ClickAtHome computer.

The following is information to help you view this document beginning on
November 15.  To access and print your pay advice from eHRonline:

     1.   Log-on to eHRonline with your "P" number and password.
     For more details on how to log-on to eHRonline, see
     step-by-step instructions at
     http://isc.enron.com/site/doclibrary/user/
     2.   Navigate to the pay advice using the following navigation
     menus:
?    Pay Information
?    Paycheck Inquiry
     3.   Select the appropriate payroll period.
     4.   Click on the Continue button.
     5.   Click on the payroll period link under the Period heading;
     a new window opens.
     6.   Select the Open this file from its current location option.
     7.   Click on the OK button; this starts Adobe Acrobat Reader.
     8.   View your pay advice.
     9.   Click on the Print icon from the main toolbar.
   10.    Verify/change the displayed printer.
   11.    Click on the OK button to print the pay advice at the
     designated printer.  For more details on how to view & print
     your pay advice from eHRonline, see step-by-step
     instructions at http://isc.enron.com/site/doclibrary/user/

The advice information will remain on this site throughout the year
allowing you to view or print the information at your convenience.  You can
view a sample of the online pay stub by following this link to
http://hrweb.enron.com/, click on Payroll Services and then on Payroll
Forms.

If you'd like more details, there will be an Information Booth on November
13 through 15 from 11 am to 2 pm in the lobby of Enron North.  Come by and
visit with Payroll Representatives who will demonstrate how the process
works.


Yes Tana, they are an ESP.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Jones, Tana
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 10:46 AM
To: Guidroz, Walter; Moran, Tom
Subject: Proliance Energy, LLC

My database is not showing that I've looked at this counterparty before, so I
need to know if they are an ESP, or not?


Meeting w/John Lavorato, Elizabeth Sager, Roger Herndon and Kevin Presto


That would be great.  We can leave his "stuff" by the front door.  I know he
will have things he wants to bring to show you.

Michael asked me for advice yesterday.  ("Mom, I have a problem...").  He now
has 2 girlfriends, Ashley plus a new one, Marilyn.  He was torn.  He decided
to stick with Ashley. Oh, the problems of a 6 year old!!

Michael is very excited about the weekend.  He just doesn't think it will be
long enough!!

Thanks for everything,

Kay

"Brashear, Charlotte" <cbrashear@velaw.com> on 10/26/2000 09:45:55 AM
To: "'Kay.Mann@enron.com'" <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: RE: Weekend

   No problem as far as I am concerned.  I can just pick up the
antibiotics and anything Michael has forgotten on the way back after I pick
him up.

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2000 9:42 AM
To: Brashear, Charlotte
Subject: Re: Weekend

Hi Charlotte,

I'm glad you wrote, as I was going to write you.

Michael has strep (as do I), so he and I are home today.  He is on two
antibiotics which he takes twice a day.  I'm trying to figure out how to
get these to you, since these have to be refrigerated.  Obviously, if
Michael  isn't doing great I won't go.  Currently, he feels fine, and only
feels bad when he has fever. He woke up with fever again this am, but the
fever should go away after 24 hours on the antibiotics.  Just let me know
if you aren't comfortable with  the situation.  I can always leave on
Saturday, or not at all.

Michael's doctor is Rey Calderon 713 520 9550.  His wife (and assistant) is
Delores, and they are wonderful about returning calls, etc.

We will be staying at the Hyatt Hill Country Resort, 210 647 1234. Saturday
night I will be staying in Round Rock (going to Paige's homecoming in
Georgetown), but Neil will still be at the Hyatt.

Michael says hi, by the way.  He is watching me type this.

Kay

"Brashear, Charlotte" <cbrashear@velaw.com> on 10/26/2000 07:15:59 AM

To:   "Mann Kay (E-mail)" <kmann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject:  Weekend

           Don't forget to let me know where you will be staying in San
Antonio.  Also, what is Michael's doctor's last name.  I know it's Reynaldo
something.

           Thanks.  Have a great time and don't worry about Michael.


Our first Working Group meeting is set for Friday, January 14, at 9:30 am
Central Standard Time .  If you can't make it, please let me know and arrange
for an alternate, if possible.  At this meeting, we will develop group
objectives and some initial to-do's.

If you have not yet responded with your personal information and suggested
objectives, please do so prior to the meeting so we can update the agenda
with everyone's responses.  Thank you!

TIME:   1/14/00  9:30 am CST to 11:30 am CST
Call in Numbers - US   (will be provided with final agenda)
International   (will be provided with final agenda)

In Houston, Room EB 4741

I.     Administrative Issues
 a.  why a working group
 b.  expectations

II.     Our group
 a.  roster
 b.  suggested objectives

III.    Consensus Group Objectives
 (develop single set for the group)

IV.   Identify initial set of subgroups
 a. purpose of subgroups


The Governor signed SBX2 85 (Burton) into law today.  The measure prohibits
the CPUC from raising rates for residential and small businesses upon
termination of the 10 percent rate freeze if the rate hike is solely the
result of the rate freeze ending.  There is some confusion as to when the
bill takes effect because the Assembly never adjourned the Second
Extraordinary Session.  In a special session, bills take effect 90 days upon
adjournment of session.


Sally:

Attached you will find a list of UT Austin graduates at Enron, including
their degree earned.  Patti had conveyed to me last week that you were
interested in such a report.  I hope it helps, and look forward to meeting
with Rick, Mark and yourself soon!

Lexi


are you fucking kidding me?

i'm always right, baby.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Jai Hawker <JHawker@petersco.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Wednesday, January 30, 2002 8:51 AM
To:	Richey, Cooper
Subject:	RE: address

Did you guess right for the free cable?

-----Original Message-----
From: Richey, Cooper [mailto:Cooper.Richey@ENRON.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 8:50 AM
To: jhawker@petersco.com
Subject: address

here's the address in case you need it for something:

303 1001 14th Ave SW
Calgary AB T2R1L2

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Dear Eric,  Details of two major pieces of energy legislation were released this week.  Washington Bureau Chief Peter Cook says we'll have more reaction on Friday to the Senate Democrats' comprehensive energy bill. We'll also have reaction to House Energy and Air Quality Chairman Joe Barton's electricity legislation.  Barton talked about the legislation on ENL Thursday afternoon and you can watch that interview in its entirety in ENL's Video Library.  On Friday during the noon ET newscast we'll hear what the American Public Power Association thinks of the bill.   The Washington bureau will also take a closer look at the debate over vehicle fuel economy standards.  A hearing took place on Thursday in the Senate.  We'll bring you the follow-up on Friday.    We'll also have the latest on the Enron situation from Washington.  Company Chairman Ken Lay is currently scheduled to participate in a hearing on the Hill next week.   On Friday, Houston Bureau Chief Myra Jolivet says we'll speak with Ann Baker Ronn and Karen Churchfield of the AFP Financial Planning Group.  They'll join us to discuss what effect the Enron business dealings are having on 401(k) programs.  Ronn and Churchfield will also discuss retirement savings and ways to avoid going down with the company in bad situations.    The electronic trading organization Tradespark is rebuilding after devastating staff losses in the attacks from September 11. On Friday, the Houston bureau will speak with Tradespark Managing Director Michael Williams about the companies operations after 9/11.   We'll also have more from the Gulf of Mexico offshore drilling conference in Houston.  Companies at the conference are exhibiting the latest technology and information from the offshore business sector.     We've got more live coverage on Friday from Platts' Day of the Trader Conference in Las Vegas.  Don't miss reports from West Coast Correspondent Kym McNicholas, live from the conference tomorrow.     Closing Prices for Thursday, Dec. 6, 2001    Crude: $18.54/bbl -$0.95   Unleaded: $0.5175/gallon -$0.0245   Heating Oil: $0.5066/gallon -$0.0248   Gas: $2.565/mmBtu +$0.074   Keep in mind things are subject to change at a moment's notice. Occasionally guests have to cancel or change time slots.  We'll continue to do our best to keep you updated on future interviews and events.     Be sure to watch our newscasts every business day - 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. ET, at the top of each hour.

	 	Jay Rickerts, EnergyNewsLive.com Anchor  View today's Energy Wrap Video Windows Media Player: 56K  |  100K  |  300K  Real Player: 56K  |  100K  |  300K  (Requires Windows Media Player or Real Player )   Experience all that Williams Energy News Live has to offer!   If you are receiving this letter for the first time and wish to continue, subscribe now    To stop receiving this letter, unsubscribe now    If you are having trouble receiving this e-mail, please let us know  or  call (800) WILLIAMS (800-945-5426) weekdays, 7am-7pm CST.    Comments? Suggestions? Let us  know  or  call (800) WILLIAMS (800-945-5426) weekdays, 7am-7pm CST.    Copyright 2001 Williams Energy News Live, LLC. All  Rights Reserved.


i did.  it was at the end of the 22-page fax i sent to you last night.  did
you get that?

From: Sara Shackleton@ECT on 09/13/2000 02:08 PM
To: Julia H Chin/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Marlin

You were going to send me a copy of the Marlin confirm - Thanks.  Sara


IntercontinentalExchange
                                                                                Firm Power Price Bulletin
                                                                                For Power Delivered on Wednesday, November  14, 2001
                                                                                (Trade Date of Tuesday, November  13, 2001)
Click here to access index history .
                                                                                * volume represents sell-side only *

Hub	High	Low	Wtd Avg Index	Change ($)	Vol (Mwh)
Cinergy	         $26.50	         $24.75	         $25.69	+    .71	          80,800
Comed	         $25.75	         $24.00	         $24.57	+   1.64	           8,800
Entergy	         $23.40	         $21.00	         $21.99	-   2.87	          19,200
Nepool	         $35.75	         $35.45	         $35.61	-    .50	           8,000
Palo Verde	         $24.25	         $15.25	         $22.46	-   6.66	           9,600
PJM-West	         $25.00	         $24.40	         $24.53	-    .49	          99,200
SP-15	         $27.00	         $24.75	         $25.93	-   5.93	           6,800
TVA	         $25.00	         $23.75	         $24.15	+    .20	          13,600

                                                                                Includes all trades done from 6 AM to 11 AM Central Prevailing Time on the trade date specified for financially firm power delivered during the on-peak hours (6 AM - 10 PM CPT for Eastern hubs / 6 AM - 10 PM Pacific Prevailing Time for Western hubs) on the delivery date(s) specified.
                                                                                IntercontinentalExchange is the world's most liquid trading platform for over-the-counter energy and metals.  Active markets include North American power and natural gas, global crude and refined oil products, and precious metals.  Traded instruments include forwards, swaps, and options.
In order to receive the proprietary information contained in this email, you acknowledge and agree that you shall not further disseminate the IntercontinentalExchange Market Data contained herein to any person or entity without the express written consent of IntercontinentalExchange.    Furthermore, you acknowledge that (1) IntercontinentalExchange has exclusive and valuable property rights in this data; (2) IntercontinentalExchange's data is being made available to you only for your own business or personal activities; and (3) you cannot communicate the data, in any form, to any other person or entity without the express written consent of IntercontinentalExchange.
This data is provided to you free of charge.  IntercontinentalExchange reserves the right to cancel this service at any time for any reason or no reason at all.
You agree that IntercontinentalExchange does not make any representations or warranties, express or implied, with respect to the data.
To become an Exchange Participant or inquire about the indices, please contact sales@intcx.com .
To unsubscribe from this service, click here unsubscribe .
                                                                                ?Copyright IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. 2001, All Rights Reserved.


---------------------- Forwarded by Donald Wayne Vinson/HOU/ECT on 05/23/2001
04:18 PM ---------------------------
From: Judith Schlesinger/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/23/2001 01:17 PM
To: Donald Wayne Vinson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Don't watch while eating lunch


Attached you will find the interview packet for the above-referenced person.
The interview will happen Friday, March 30, 2001 .  Please print all three
documents for your hard copies.  If you have any questions, or conflicts of
schedule, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Sasha Divelbiss
58714


Attached are the details of the next Corporate Responsibility Task Force
meeting set for next Tuesday, February 6, from 9:00 to 11:00 a.m. CST in
Houston.


Sorry this should be December Production

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ewing, Linda J.
Sent:	Tuesday, January 15, 2002 3:59 PM
To:	Keiser, Kam
Cc:	Baxter, Bryce
Subject:	CITY OF PALO ALTO     - November Production - Sales

   Mr. Raveen Maan with the City of Palo Alto called stating that all contracts were cancelled at the end of Nov..So why are
   Demand Charges being billed to them plus volumes -  I will work with Volume for the actuals on this.   Below listed are deal
   numbers for the Demand charges.  Please advise if these should have been billed.

   1051884
   851617
   912999
   913364
   936021
   948197
   951004
   984564
   1043230
   1002951 -  volumes

   Thanks

Linda J Ewing
Specialist - Settlements
Enron North America
(713) 853-5667 ph
(713)646-8420 fx
email: linda.j.ewing@enron.com


<title>Special anniversary offer from Upstream</title>
If you have problems reading this mail, click here

Dear industry colleague.

Have you looked at Upstream recently?  Over the last year we have made a number of changes to create an all round service providing top quality news in the format you want - when you want it.

UpstreamLive,which was launched in January 2001 and  provides unbeatable 24-hour news coverage of the global oil and gas industry

Access to the hardcopy in full online every Friday

'By the Numbers', giving you continuous updated statistical information for the oil and gas industry, including oil and gas prices, supply and demand tables, and rig and support vessel rates.

Full access to our comprehensive archive of all stories ever published in Upstream and Upstream Online ? an essential research tool.

A daily news bulletin emailed directly to your computer summarizing the most important industry events and news over the last 24 hours.

In addition we have further strengthened our global coverage by expanding our editorial team with three new reporters this year, including the respected technology editor Adrian Cottrill.

But the best news is that this entire package is included in your Upstream subscription.  Sign up by the end of November and get the following with our compliments:

3 free issues of Upstream worth $13 each

Your choice of a steel torch, a polished steel address book or business card holder

Avoid the $25 price increase for 2002

To start your subscription simply send us an email stating the gift you want to receive and we will get your subscription started immediately. The annual subscription fee for 2001 is $650.

For more information please contact us at:
subscriberservice@upstreamonline.com

I look forward to welcoming you back as a subscriber.

Yours faithfully
Erik Means
Editor in Chief


Please find attached a clean and blacklined draft of the revised ISDA Master.


On November 8th begining at HE 8 Tosco informed Real time that they were
going off the grid with no return ETA.   They were scheduled in correctly for
the day ahead at 7 MW.  We were able to take out hours 11-24 however, hours
8-10 we were short ex-post by the 7 MW.  Toscos schedule was zeroed out by
decing short term cali load in PGE 3 per Jeff Richter.  Note to real time
night shift.  Tosco may be coming back on line completely but as of yet they
have not  called back to notify when that may be.  Please contact me or
Jeremy with any questions.


See attached


I've sent JRigby the execution versions of the break out contract and the
override letter.  I've asked him to call me to discuss.

FYI: The turbine contract was originally drafted by Brian Barto, then Kathy
Clark took over.  Scott Dieball (EECC Legal) was actively involved in the
negotiations, as was I. In facct, it was the first deal I worked on after I
transferred to ENA from EECC.

Kay

From: Roseann Engeldorf on 01/05/2001 12:39 PM
To: Lisa Alfaro/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Brett R Wiggs/SA/Enron@Enron, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron,
dgholke@skadden.com, "ROB TAYLOR" <TAYLR@andrews-kurth.com>

Subject: Re: ESA Documents needed to complete the Eletrobolt EPC

No - he wants to see the breakout, but generally the commercial ts and cs are
the same.  The breakout should be different only insofar as technical-type
changes were made to accommodate a smaller "batch" of turbines and certain
other site-specific changes.  The "override" letter contains the financing
type changes that need to be in these "surrogate purchaser" deals.  The idea
is that once the financing entities are out of the picture and we want to
sell the facility, the breakout turbine purchase agreement can be assigned to
the new owner without the funky "overrride letter" requirements.

Brett's question went to whether EECC would be critical of the commercial
deal terms, because, oddly enough, EECC has historically been the point
organization for all power asset purchases within Enron - whether the
purchase was ultimately for an ENA, ESA or EECC/NEPCO project.  In this case,
Brett can be assured that EECC had its input into the commercial terms last
May, when Kay Mann (ENA power development lawyer) worked with Katherine Clark
(an EECC contracts administrator) on the deal.

Sorry for the confusion.

Thanks,

Rose

	Lisa Alfaro@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	01/05/2001 12:30 PM

		 To: Roseann Engeldorf/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Brett R Wiggs/SA/Enron@Enron, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, "ROB TAYLOR"
<TAYLR@andrews-kurth.com>@ENRON, Mary Kimball/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: ESA Documents needed to complete the Eletrobolt EPC

So he doesn't want to see the breakout?  Only the original purchase agreement?


Julian and I only have one change.  We would like to have the full text to
the second paragraph of the Floating Price difinition included so the
customer sees it up front.  This is the language which I pulled from the
Central Puerto confirm:

The parties agree that the Floating Amounts payable under this Transaction
shall be made in US Dollars, and the rate of exchange of Argentine Pesos to
US Dollars shall be of one (1) Argentine Peso per US Dollar as set forth
under Law 23,928, as amended, while there is free convertibility of the
Argentine Peso and the rate of exchange therein set forth is of one (1)
Argentine Peso per US Dollar. Otherwise, the rate of exchange between
Argentine Pesos and US Dollars shall be calculated using the exchange rate,
sell, for transfers abroad established by Banco Naci?n Argentina at the
closing of the Business Day prior to that on which payment is effected.
Argentine Peso means the lawful currency of the Republic of Argentina.

Julian is traveling to Houston tonight and will call you tomorrow to discuss
the sending of the document to CMS.  Thanks for your help.

Brent


I think so, I would treat you better than she can

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:36 PM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

we will have to work on that in the future

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:36 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

No, I'm actually pretty happy about the deal.  Not as happy as I would be if I were working for you.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:35 PM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

thats not bad

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:35 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

Yeah, right.  I wish! I am working for Chris still and Scott Neal.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:34 PM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

perfect, are you working with me

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:32 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:

We're going to be sitting kina close after the move.


OK with you guys for me to add this?
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 12/08/2000 12:13
PM ---------------------------

"Taylor, Rob" <robtaylor@akllp.com> on 12/08/2000 12:12:37 PM
To: "Roseann M Engeldorf (E-mail)" <Roseann.Engeldorf@enron.com>, "Kay Mann
(E-mail)" <kay.mann@enron.com>, "Sheila Tweed (E-mail)"
<Sheila.Tweed@enron.com>, "Lisa Bills (E-mail)" <Lisa.Bills@enron.com>
cc: "Bunk, Sean" <seanbunk@akllp.com>

Subject: Winston & Strawn Comment: Consents to Assignment

Winston & Strawn has asked that the following be added to the Consents
to Assignment (e.g., in the "Successors and Assigns" paragraph):

"WestLB is an express third-party beneficiary of this Consent."

Please forward the revised draft of the GE Consent to Winston & Strawn
(toxley@winston.com).

Regards,

Rob Taylor
Andrews & Kurth L.L.P.
600 Travis Street
Suite 4200
Houston, Texas  77002

Tel: (713) 220-4436
Fax: (713) 238-7273
e-mail: robtaylor@andrews-kurth.com

This e-mail is privileged and confidential and is intended only for the
recipient(s) named above.  If you are not the intended recipient, please
(i) do not read, copy, use or disclose the contents hereof to others
(any of the foregoing being strictly prohibited), (ii) notify the sender
immediately of your receipt hereof, and (iii) delete this e-mail and all
copies of it.


The continued growth of the Enron Europe office and related businesses has
prompted a change in the management of Risk Assessment and Control (RAC) in
London.  Effective in early January, 2001, Ted Murphy will transfer to the
London office and manage the RAC activities which includes credit/market risk
and underwriting. Ted will continue to manage the Enron Global Market Risk
activities.  Steve Young, currently managing RAC in London, will begin a new
assignment within  EBS, also in London.

The Houston Market Risk group will be managed by David Port.

As Enron continues to expand its trading and risk management businesses, it
is vital that trading and credit policies are administered in a consistent
and accurate manner across the company.  Hopefully this realignment will
accomplish that goal.

Please join me in congratulating Ted, David and Steve on their new
assignments.


I am fine with mine.

Thanks.

To: Cathy Pittenger/HOU/EES@EES, Jesus Guerra/HOU/EES@EES, Matt
Culver/HOU/EES@EES, Paul Shoemaker/HOU/EES@EES, David Draper/HOU/EES@EES,
John McCarthy/HOU/EES@EES, Matthew B Fleming/HOU/EES@EES, Eric
Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: JDF T-shirts

Ok, I'm supposed to be getting more XLs today.  If you don't want to trade
your T-shirt for an XL, please let me know, otherwise leave your T-shirt in
your chair in case you're not there when I come by.  I'll switch them when I
get the XLs from our team lead.

Thanks,
Allison


Teresa G. Bushman
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3835A
Houston, TX  77002
(713) 853-7895
fax (713) 646-3393
teresa.g.bushman@enron.com

----- Forwarded by Teresa G Bushman/HOU/ECT on 12/27/00 09:46 PM -----

	"Rosser, Dianna" <drosser@velaw.com>
	12/27/00 08:45 PM

		 To: "'rwight@milbank.com'" <rwight@milbank.com>, "'mwilson@milbank.com'"
<mwilson@milbank.com>, "'philip.levy@chase.com'" <philip.levy@chase.com>,
"'jeffrey.w.dellapina@chase.com'" <jeffrey.w.dellapina@chase.com>,
"'melissa.c.vogel@chase.com'" <melissa.c.vogel@chase.com>,
"'kevin_p_kearns@fleet.com'" <kevin_p_kearns@fleet.com>,
"'renee_r_nadler@fleet.com'" <renee_r_nadler@fleet.com>,
"'richard_aidala@fleet.com'" <richard_aidala@fleet.com>,
"'jill_a_calabrese@fleet.com'" <jill_a_calabrese@fleet.com>,
"'James_r_mcbride@fleet.com'" <James_r_mcbride@fleet.com>,
"'mark_service@fleet.com'" <mark_service@fleet.com>,
"'Sean_o'neill@fleet.com'" <Sean_o'neill@fleet.com>,
"'ian.james@mourant.com'" <ian.james@mourant.com>
		 cc: "'teresa.g.bushman@enron.com'" <teresa.g.bushman@enron.com>,
"'joseph.deffner@enron.com'" <joseph.deffner@enron.com>, "Shouse, August"
<AShouse@velaw.com>
		 Subject: marked copies of changed documents

Attached please find marked copies of those documents that have been edited.
Clean copies of all the documents will follow shortly.

If you have any comments or questions, please feel free to contact August
Shouse or me.

Regards,

Dianna J. Rosser
Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.
Business and International Section
3300 First City Tower
1001 Fannin Street
Houston, Texas 77002-6760
tel: (713) 758-3688
fax: (713) 615-5899
email: drosser@velaw.com

          ++++++CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE+++++
The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged.  This
email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization
named above.  If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized
representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any,
or the information contained herein is prohibited.  If you have received
this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email
and delete this email from your system.  Thank You
 <<Enron Guaranty (comp. 4 and 5).DOC>>   <<Natural Gas Inventory Forward
Sale Contract (compare 3 and 4).DOC>>   <<V&E Legal Opinion (compare 1 and
2).DOC>>   <<Consent and Agreement (comp. 4 and 5).DOC>>   <<Consent and
Agreement between Enron Corp. and Chase Manhattan, blackline of 3 and
4.DOC>>   <<Confirmation Letter - Natural Gas Forward Sale Contract
(blackline of 2&3).DOC>>

 - Houston_419764_1.DOC
 - Enron Guaranty (comp. 4 and 5).DOC
 - Natural Gas Inventory Forward Sale Contract (compare 3 and 4).DOC
 - V&E Legal Opinion (compare 1 and 2).DOC
 - Consent and Agreement (comp. 4 and 5).DOC
 - Consent and Agreement between Enron Corp. and Chase Manhattan, blackline
of 3 and 4.DOC
 - Confirmation Letter - Natural Gas Forward Sale Contract (blackline of
2&3).DOC


---------------------- Forwarded by Jennifer Cutaia/Corp/Enron on 12/12/2000
04:12 PM ---------------------------

"Jennifer Cutaia" <jcutaia@tupac.com> on 12/11/2000 03:19:51 PM
To: Jennifer.Cutaia@enron.com
cc:

Subject: [Fwd: ]

>From: Crystal.Reyna@enron.com
>Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 09:45:55 -0600
>
>Content-Disposition: inline
>(See attached file: GREATDAY!.pps)

------------------------------------------------------------
Are You Hip?  Get Hip!  http://www.gohip.com

 - GREATDAY!.pps


Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 04/09/2001 04:09 PM -----

	Jean Munoz <jmunoz@mcnallytemple.com>
	04/09/2001 04:48 PM

		 To: "'Andy Brown (E-mail)'" <ABB@eslawfirm.com>, "'B Brown Andy (E-mail)'"
<andybrwn@earthlink.net>, "'Baker Carolyn (E-mail)'"
<cabaker@duke-energy.com>, "'Bob Escalante (E-mail)'"
<rescalante@riobravo-gm.com>, "'Bob Weisenmiller (E-mail)'"
<rbw@mrwassoc.com>, "'Curtis Kebler (E-mail)'"
<curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com>, "Dean. Nistetter (E-mail)"
<Dean.Nistetter@dynegy.com>, "'Douglas Kerner (E-mail)'" <DKK@eslawfirm.com>,
"'Greg Blue (E-mail)'" <gtbl@dynegy.com>, "'Jan Smutny-Jones (E-mail)'"
<smutny@iepa.com>, "'Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)'" <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>,
"'Joe Ronan (E-mail)'" <joer@calpine.com>, "'John Larrea (E-mail)'"
<john.g.larrea@williams.com>, "'John Stout (E-mail)'"
<John_H_Stout@reliantenergy.com>, "'Julee Malinowski-Ball (E-mail)'"
<jmball@ns.net>, "'Kassandra Gough (E-mail)'" <kgough@calpine.com>, "'kent
Palmerton (E-mail)'" <kent.palmerton@williams.com>, "'Lynn Lednicky
(E-mail)'" <lale@dynegy.com>, "Marie Moretti (E-mail 2)"
<mmoretti@mccabeandcompany.net>, "'Marty Wilson (E-mail)'"
<mwilson@pstrategies.com>, "'McNally Ray (E-mail)'"
<rmcnally@mcnallytemple.com>, "''Nam Nguyen' (E-mail)'"
<nam.nguyen@powersrc.com>, "'Norton Kelli (E-mail)'"
<knorton@mcnallytemple.com>, "'Paula Hall-Collins (E-mail)'"
<paula.hall-collins@williams.com>, "'Pigott Jack (E-mail)'"
<jackp@calpine.com>, "'Richard Hyde (E-mail)'" <rwhyde@duke-energy.com>,
"'Roger Pelote (E-mail)'" <roger.pelote@williams.com>, "'Stephanie-Newell
(E-mail)'" <stephanie-newell@reliantenergy.com>, "'Sue Mara (E-mail)'"
<smara@enron.com>, "'Tom Ross (E-mail)'" <tross@mcnallytemple.com>, "Tom
Williams (E-mail)" <tcwillia@duke-energy.com>, "'Alex Sugaoka (E-mail)'"
<alex.sugaoka@uaecorp.com>, "'Bill Carlson (E-mail)'"
<william_carlson@wastemanagement.com>, "'Bill Woods (E-mail)'"
<billw@calpine.com>, "'Bob Ellery (E-mail)'" <bellery@spi-ind.com>, "'Bob
Gates (E-mail)'" <bob.gates@enron.com>, "'Cody Carter (E-mail)'"
<cody.carter@williams.com>, "'Curt Hatton (E-mail)'"
<Curt.Hatton@gen.pge.com>, "'David Parquet'" <david.parquet@enron.com>,
"'Dean Gosselin (E-mail)'" <dean_gosselin@fpl.com>, "'Doug Fernley (E-mail)'"
<fernley.doug@epenergy.com>, "'Duane Nelsen (E-mail)'"
<dnelsen@gwfpower.com>, "'Ed Tomeo (E-mail)'" <ed.tomeo@uaecorp.com>,
"'Eileen Koch (E-mail)'" <eileenk@calpine.com>, "'Eric Eisenman (E-mail)'"
<eric.eisenman@gen.pge.com>, "'Frank DeRosa (E-mail)'"
<frank.derosa@gen.pge.com>, "Frazier Blaylock (E-mail)"
<frazier_blaylock@ogden-energy.com>, "'Hap Boyd (E-mail)'"
<Hap_Boyd@enron.com>, "'Hawks Jack (E-mail)'" <jack.hawks@gen.pge.com>, "'Jim
Willey (E-mail)'" <elliottsa@earthlink.net>, "'Joe Greco (E-mail)'"
<jgreco@caithnessenergy.com>, "'Jonathan Weisgall (E-mail)'"
<jweisgall@aol.com>, "'Kate Castillo (E-mail)'" <CCastillo@riobravo-gm.com>,
"'Kelly Lloyd (E-mail)'" <kellyl@enxco.com>, "'Ken Hoffman (E-mail)'"
<khoffman@caithnessenergy.com>, "'Kent Fickett (E-mail)'"
<kfickett@usgen.com>, "'Lynn Lednicky (E-mail)'"
<lynn.a.lednicky@dynegy.com>, "'Marty McFadden (E-mail)'"
<marty_mcfadden@ogden-energy.com>, "'Paula Soos'"
<paula_soos@ogden-energy.com>, "'Randy Hickok (E-mail)'"
<rjhickok@duke-energy.com>, "Rick S. Koebbe (E-mail)"
<rskoebbe@powerworksinc.com>, "'Rob Lamkin (E-mail)'"
<rllamkin@seiworldwide.com>, "'Ross Ain (E-mail)'" <ain@worldnet.att.net>,
"'Steve Iliff'" <siliff@riobravo-gm.com>, "'Steve Ponder (E-mail)'"
<steve_ponder@fpl.com>, "'Tony Wetzel (E-mail)'" <twetzel@thermoecotek.com>,
"'William Hall (E-mail)'" <wfhall2@duke-energy.com>,
<trusso@mcnallytemple.com>, <sadlersa@earthlink.net>, <mstultz@epsa.org>,
<rtemple@mcnallytemple.com>, <tracy.fairchild@edelman.com>,
<megan.beiser@edelman.com>, <deborah.fiorito@dynegy.com>, <lchurch@epsa.org>,
Katie Kaplan <kaplan@iepa.com>, <tcwillia@duke-energy.com>,
<rwhyde@duke-energy.com>, <tmcmorrow@manatt.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Governor to announce deal with Edison

The Governor is currently holding a press conference to announce deal with
Edison.   We will keep you posted with details.  IEP will be responding.

Thanks,
Jean

--
Jean Munoz
McNally Temple Associates
916-447-8186
916-447-6326 (fx)

________________
Calif Gov. To Announce Deal With SoCal Ed-Spokesman
Updated: Monday, April 9, 2001 05:37 PM;ET

;
NEW YORK (Dow Jones)--California Gov. Gray Davis will announce a final deal
with Edison International (EIX, news, msgs) unit Southern California Edison
to buy the utility's power lines, Davis' spokesman said Monday afternoon.

Monday's deal will include four elements of Davis' speech delivered live
statewide Thursday, said Davis spokesman Steve Maviglio.

Davis spoke about an alternative rate hike plan Thursday to the one ordered
by state regulators two weeks ago. Although Davis' rate increase is lower
than the overal 27% increase ordered by the California Public Utilities
Commission, the governor's plan allows the utility to collect a portion of
the rate increase that will be used to restructure $5 billion in
undercollected power costs.

Davis said in his five-minute statewide address Thursday that if the state
were to buy SoCal Ed's transmission lines, the utility would have to agree to
drop its federal lawsuit against the PUC, where it sought to recoup the
billions of dollars in undercollected power costs from ratepayers retroactive
to August 2000, and sell the state power from its hydroelectric plants at
cost for 10 years.

Davis announced an agreement in principle with SoCal Ed seven weeks ago to
buy the utility's transmission lines for $2.76 billion and the two have
negotiated during that time to reach a final agreement.

A spokesman at the utility would not comment.

A day after Davis' five-minute address, PG&E Corp. (PCG, news, msgs) Pacific
Gas & Electric filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection because
negotiations with the state over a similar deal were "going nowhere."

Harvey Rosenfield, executive director of consumer group Foundation for
Taxpayer and Consumer Rights in Santa Monica, said Davis' announcement is a
massive "bailout" for SoCal Ed.

Rosenfield said he will push for a ballot initiative next year to undo the
state's six-year-old deregulation debacle.

-By Jason Leopold; Dow Jones Newswires; 201-938-5905;
jason.leopold@dowjonews.com

Monday April 9, 6:06 pm Eastern Time

Calif. Gov. Davis, SoCal Edison to announce deal

(Adds background,

LOS ANGELES, April 9 (Reuters) - California Governor Gray Davis and Southern
California Edison have reached an agreement after a weekend of harried talks
aimed at a deal that would provide state money to the cash-strapped utility
in exchange for its transmission lines, a spokesman for the governor said.
ADVERTISEMENT

Davis and John Bryson, the chairman of Southern California Edison parent
Edison International (NYSE:EIX - news), scheduled a news conference from 3
p.m. PDT (6 p.n. EDT) in Los Angeles to discuss the agreement, the governor's
office said. No further details were immediately available.

The announcement came as bankruptcy proceedings began for the state's largest
utility, Pacific Gas & Electric, a unit of PG&E Corp. (NYSE:PCG - news),
which on Friday sought protection for creditors after declaring that it had
been unable to reach an accord with Davis.

Shares in Edison International closed up 8 percent on Monday on expectations
that the two sides were close to reaching a deal under which the state would
reportedly pay billions for the company's transmission lines.

Southern California Edison power transmission grid is a 12,000-mile (19,200
km) web of high voltage lines covering much of the southern region of the
state.

The lines carry electricity from power plants to substations, where the
voltage is reduced to a level that can be moved safely into neighborhood
distribution lines to homes and businesses.

The utility's 88,000-miles (105,600 km) of distribution lines serve about 11
million Southern Californians.

The utility has carried the lines at a book value of $1.2 billion. Under a
the terms of a preliminary deal, the state had proposed buying the lines for
$2.76 billion, or 2.3 times the book value.


October 30, 2001

ATTENTION ALL PLANT OPERATORS, SHIPPERS AND NOMINATING AGENTS:

Weekend imbalance payback restrictions to PSCo will be lifted effective Gas Day November 3rd, until further notice and as system operations allow.  Plant Operators must confirm imbalance payback volumes to  PSCo by no later than 10:30 AM one business day in advance; payback volumes not previously confirmed will be cut and PSCo may activate flow control valves on any plants that are over-delivering into the system without permission to do so.

Shippers/Nominating Agents can nominate imbalance payback gas to PSCo for the weekends following the normal nomination schedule.  If you have any questions regarding those nominations, please contact your Transportation Specialist.

PSCo's ability to accept imbalance nominations is subject to operational considerations; you will be notified via PSCo's EBB if imbalance payback restrictions are implemented again.

We appreciate your assistance in managing your gas load requirements responsibly.  Please don't hesitate to call if you have any questions or concerns pertaining to your scheduling needs.

David Briggs - Xcel Energy
Project Administrator
Certified Web Designer
Phone: (303) 571-7812
     Fax: (303) 571-7001
 Email: David.Briggs@Xcelenergy.Com


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 05/09/2000 09:26
AM ---------------------------

Chris Germany
05/08/2000 01:05 PM
To: Scott Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David Oliver/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alicia
Perkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Crystal Hyde/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Steve Jackson/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: CES Sales

Steve, I don't think you need to be at our meeting.  We have room 3125B at
1:30 PM tomorrow.

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 05/08/2000 01:03
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kimberly Brown                           05/08/2000 12:48 PM

To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: CES Sales

EB3125B


Evelyn -
Here's the status of those year-long deals I changed last night. Everything
should look good now - 571920 now has 25 mwh and 571801 is killed. Let me
know if you still see something wrong.

Thanks,
Kate
---------------------- Forwarded by Kate Symes/PDX/ECT on 04/06/2001 08:54 AM
---------------------------
   Kate Symes                04/06/2001 08:40 AM

To: Fran Chang/PDX/ECT@ECT, Heather Dunton/PDX/ECT@ECT, Samantha
Law/PDX/ECT@ECT, Casey Evans/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Deal Change - Revision of last night's Deal Correction Report

This morning I was notified by Confirms in Houston that one of the deal
changes I made last night didn't come through on their side. If you refer to
the Deal Correction Report from yesterday, Mike Swerzbin did a deal with EES
for Cal'03 that he mistakenly entered twice, once for Cal'03 (571920) and
once for Cal'02 (571801). He killed 571920 and kept 571801, but the trade was
actually for Cal'03. (Is everyone still with me?) So I restored 571920 and
killed 571801 to reverse what he had done. But in my rush just before your
calc last night I neglected to look at the volumes of the deal I was
restoring, which incidently had been zeroed out, thus leaving Mike with no
value for either of the deals.

I've reinstated the volumes in deal 571920 and added the error to today's
deal correction report. I just wanted to give you guys a heads up. Please let
me know if you have questions.

Thanks,
Kate


Carmen, please print out memo and attachment.  Thanbks. DF
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 01/06/2000
06:35 PM ---------------------------

Virginia O'Neill

01/06/2000 08:06 AM

To: John Dushinske/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, George Fastuca/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew
Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Robert
Jones/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mike McGowan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kent
Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Rockey
Storie/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Julia White/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dave
Neubauer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michel Nelson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Martha Benner/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lisa Costello/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dea
Crum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rosemary Gracey/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Judy
Kudym/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Audrey Robertson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Sharon
Solon/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Linda Wehring/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ricki
Winters/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Deb Cappiello/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Pilar
Ramirez/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Julie McCoy/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: GPG GOALS & OBJECTIVES FOR 2000

---------------------- Forwarded by Virginia O'Neill/ET&S/Enron on 01/06/2000
08:05 AM ---------------------------

Bill Cordes
01/06/2000 07:47 AM

To: Virginia O'Neill/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: GPG GOALS & OBJECTIVES FOR 2000

Please forward to ET&S officers.
---------------------- Forwarded by Bill Cordes/ET&S/Enron on 01/06/2000
07:47 AM ---------------------------

Stanley Horton
01/05/2000 05:08 PM
Sent by: Cindy Stark
To: Bill Cordes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Shelley Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Larry
DeRoin/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, John Goodpasture/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Rod
Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Phil Lowry/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Rockford
Meyer/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Maryann Long/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Michael
Moran/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jenny Rub/GPGFIN/Enron@Enron, Dave
Schafer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, James Prentice/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Michael
Burke/Houston/Eott@Eott
cc:

Subject: GPG GOALS & OBJECTIVES FOR 2000

Okay...my first mistake already!   SORRY!    Here's the attachment.


FYI.  QFs meeting with Edison today.  Edison has not yet offered information on 1) date certain when QFs will be paid what they're owed, or 2) when the 5.37 cents will kick in.

Best,
Jeff

-----Original Message-----
From: Steven Kelly [mailto:steven@iepa.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2001 6:00 PM
To: Alan Comnes (E-mail); Alex Makler (E-mail); Alex Sugaoka (E-mail);
Bill Adams (E-mail); Bill Barnes (E-mail); Bill Woods (E-mail); Bob
Ellery (E-mail); Bob Escalante (E-mail); Brian T. Cragg (E-mail);
Carolyn A Baker (E-mail); Charles Johnson (E-mail); Parquet, David; Doug
Levitt (E-mail); Douglas Kerner (E-mail); Duane Nelsen (E-mail); Ed
Maddox (E-mail); Ed Tomeo (E-mail); 'Ed Wheless'; Edward Lozowicki
(E-mail); 'Eric Edstrom'; Eric Janssen (E-mail); Graeme Donaldson
(E-mail); Calvert, Gray; Greg Blue (E-mail); Hap Boyd (E-mail); Jack
Pigott (E-mail); Janet Heck-Doyle (E-mail); Joe Ronan (E-mail); John
Costanzo (E-mail); Jonathan Weisgall (E-mail); Kassandra Gough (E-mail);
Kate Castillo (E-mail); Kelly Lloyd (E-mail); Ken Hoffman (E-mail); Kent
Burton (E-mail); Les Gelber (E-mail); 'Marcie Milner'; Fillinger, Mark;
Marty McFadden (E-mail); Michael L. Hawkins (E-mail); Milton Schultz
(E-mail); Paul Wood (E-mail); Paula Soos (E-mail); Pete Levitt (E-mail);
Peter H. Weiner (E-mail); Phil Reese (E-mail); Rachel King (E-mail);
'Rand Havens '; Rich Dyer (E-mail); Robert Frees (E-mail); 'Robert
Henderson'; Roger Pelote (E-mail); 'Ron Reagan'; Ross Ain (E-mail);
Scott Harlan (E-mail); Steve Ponder (E-mail); Tandy McMannes (E-mail);
Ted Cortopassi (E-mail); Thomas Heller (E-mail); 'Timothy Peters'; Tom
Hartman (E-mail); Tony Wetzel (E-mail); Trond Aschehoug (E-mail); Ward
Scobee (E-mail); Wayne Kawamoto (E-mail); William Carlson (E-mail)
Cc: Andy Brown (E-mail); 'Carol Hudson (E-mail)'; Chris Ellison
(E-mail); 'Jan Smutny-Jones (E-mail)'; 'Katie Kaplan (E-mail)'; 'Kelli
Norton'; Sandra Moseley (E-mail); 'Steven Kelly (E-mail)'; Thomas R.
McMorrow (E-mail)
Subject: important: "FINAL' letter to fielder re QF/SCE Implementation

Attached is the finalized letter to fielder re the QF/SCE MOU Agreement
implementation.  PLEASE DISREGARD THE EARLIER EMAIL, AS IT CONTAINRD THE
FIRST DRAFT OF THE LETTER, NOT THE FINAL VERSION.


i went in and changed it.


Is this something one of your people should look at?
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT on
03/19/99 02:37 PM ---------------------------
From: Brent Hendry AT ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@CCMAIL on 02/19/99 04:43 PM
To: Julio Casillas@ECT, "Andrea Calo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT" AT
ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@CCMAIL, Sue Frusco AT ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@CCMAIL
cc: Mark - ECT Legal Taylor@ECT
Subject: Draft Template

This is a rough draft of a new form of supply agreement for electricity that
I sent to a potential supplier, Central Termica Alto Valle S.A. for their
comments.  The Termination section is still under review.
---------------------- Forwarded by Brent Hendry/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
19/02/99 04:40 PM ---------------------------

Brent Hendry
19/02/99 07:22 PM

To:   zolezzim@dmasa.com.ar
cc:   Julian Poole/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Scott
Neal/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject:  Draft Template

At the request of Scott Neal please find attached a draft Output Marketing
form for your review.

(See attached file: OUTPUTen3.doc)

 - OUTPUTen3.doc


Both deals have been changed. Jeff entered them incorrectly.

Kerri Thompson@ENRON
11/17/2000 01:21 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: apb check out

461487
461488
jeff

broker has sp15 on these deals


Teco Tap       30.000 / Enron ; 120.000 / HPL Gas Daily


I will be out on vacation the week of July 3, back at the office on July
10th. My main contact will be Stella Morris at ext. 3319. My desk will be
split as follows:

Stella - NNG-Blackmarlin (onshore), Black Marlin (offshore), Amoco third
party, Centana (on & off system, storage), Eastrans

Aimee - Carthage, Tufco updates, Bridge Back

Mark McCoy - Katy Lonestar (on & offsystem)

Tom Acton - Send nominations MOPS to POPS

Please pass this to other members of your groups, thanks.

Carlos


Please see Q71102.2 for the reversal of the original deal done on EOL.

Jean Bell@ECT
11/02/2000 01:36 PM
To: Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: COOK

ENA did an EOL deal with Cook on 11/1/00 (Q71102.1, EOL #539925).  Kevin,
Cook, has called to verbal the reversal of this deal and I do not find in
Tagg where this deal has been reversed.  Please  check and let me know that
you find so that I can call Kevin back.  Thanks.

   Reversal: Cook Buys and pays $4.555
     20,000/day, December, 2000
     ENA sells and pays last day

Jean