COLUMBIA GAS TRANSMISSION CORPORATION
                        NOTICE TO ALL INTERESTED PARTIES
                                OCTOBER 25, 2001

Notice ID: 3210
5 - NO RESPONSE REQUIRED

SUBJECT: REVISED-CAPACITY UPDATE EFFECTIVE FOR FRIDAY, OCTOBER 26, 2001

                   CHANGES ARE INDICATED WITH AN *

Effective Friday, October 26, 2001, capacities will be as follows:

Excess MDWQ              Available +
ISS Withdrawals          Available
SIT Withdrawals          Available
Imbalance Drawdowns      Available

Excess MDIQ              NOT Available +
ISS Injections           NOT Available
SIT Injections           NOT Available
Imbalance Paybacks       NOT Available

PAL Lends/Unparks        Available
PAL Parks/Loan Paybacks  NOT Available

+ Call Gas Control 24 hours in advance at (304) 357-2606 to request approval.

Non-firm receipt capacity will be as follows:

TENNESSEE:

Brinker (B12)            20,000
Broad Run (B9)          300,000
Cambridge (B10)          20,000
Dungannon (B11)          20,000
Highland (B17)                0 *

NOTE: GAS RECEIVED AT HIGHLAND MUST BE DELIVERED IN THE NORTHERN PORTION OF
MARKET AREA 38 OR THE NORTHWEST LATERAL OF MARKET AREA 36, DIRECTLY NORTH OF
HIGHLAND.

Milford (B18)            20,000
North Greenwood (B22)         0
Unionville (B15)         50,000

NOTE:  EFFECTIVE THURSDAY, AUGUST 16, 2001, ANY SHIPPER UTILIZING A CONTRACT
THAT HAS A PRIMARY RECEIPT POINT(S) WITH THE FOLLOWING POINTS, MUST UTILIZE
THESE POINTS:

         Brinker       (B12)
         Cambridge     (B10)
         Dungannon     (B11)
         Highland      (B17)
         Milford       (B18)
         Unionville    (B15)

TEXAS EASTERN:

Delmont (C16)                 0
Eagle (C22)              20,000
Hooker (C9)              20,000
Pennsburg (C23)          20,000
Windridge (C12)          20,000

NATIONAL FUEL:

Independence (M1)             0
Ellwood City (L1)        15,000

TRANSCO:

Downingtown (E3)          2,500
Emporia I (E13)          60,000
Rockville (E2)                0
Dranesville (E1)              0

EQUITABLE GAS:                  *

Hi Hat (F3)                   0 *

KENTUCKY WEST VIRGINIA (KYWV):  *

Beaver Creek (H1)             0 *

CNR PIPELINE:                   *

Boldman (CNR02)               0 *
Conoway (CNR03)               0 *
Johns Creek (CNR08)           0 *
Canada (CNR09)                0 *
Canada (CNR10)                0 *
Stafford (CNR11)              0 *
Thacker/Majestic (CNR12)      0 *
Briar Mtn. (CNR13)            0 *
Huff Creek (CNR14)            0 *

CONOCO:                       0 *

Grant (P1)                    0 *

NOTE:  ANY APPALACHIAN PRODUCTION FLOWING DIRECTLY INTO COLUMBIA'S LINE KA
BETWEEN COLUMBIA'S BOLDMAN COMPRESSOR STATION AND COLUMBIA'S HUFF CREEK
COMPRESSOR STATION AS WELL AS PRODUCTION FLOWING INTO COLUMBIA'S LINES SM-116,
KA-15, PM-3, AND PM-17 IS 0 NON-FIRM. *

ALGONQUIN:

Ramapo (R1)              75,000

ANR:

Paulding/Cecil           30,000
(F1, A2)

LEBANON AGGREGATE       100,000
(A4, F2, C4, D3)

TOLEDO AGGREGATE        100,000
(A3, F4, 734462)

COLUMBIA GULF:
(801)

TCO-Leach               700,000

Internal point non-firm capacity will be as follows:

Lanham                        0 *

Delivery capacity (non-firm) will be as follows:

TRANSCO:

Martins Creek            10,000
  (MLI E5)
Young Woman's Creek      10,000
  (MLI E9)

ALGONQUIN:

Hanover                       0
  (MLI R2)

EQUITRANS:

Fallen Timber            31,000
  (MLI K1)

Waynesburg-Rhinehart     20,000
  (MLI K2)

OPT-30 will be available in all market areas.
OPT-60 will be available in all market areas.

Market Area delivery capacity (non-firm) will be as follows:

Operating Area 1
     Market Area 33       No Restrictions
     Market Area 34       No Restrictions

Operating Area 2
     Market Area 20       No Restrictions

Operating Area 3
     Market Area 15       No Restrictions
     Market Area 16       No Restrictions
     Market Area 17       No Restrictions
     Market Area 18       No Restrictions
     Market Area 19       No Restrictions

Operating Area 4
     Market Area 21       No Restrictions
     Market Area 22       No Restrictions
     Market Area 23       No Restrictions
     Market Area 24       No Restrictions
     Market Area 25       No Restrictions
     Market Area 29       No Restrictions

Operating Area 5
     Market Area 02       No Restrictions
     Market Area 07       No Restrictions

Operating Area 6
     Market Area 10       No Restrictions
     Market Area 11       No Restrictions
     Market Area 12       No Restrictions
     Market Area 13       No Restrictions
     Market Area 14       No Restrictions

Operating Area 7
     Market Area 01       No Restrictions
     Market Area 03       No Restrictions
     Market Area 04       No Restrictions
     Market Area 05       No Restrictions
     Market Area 06       No Restrictions
     Market Area 08       No Restrictions
     Market Area 09       No Restrictions

Operating Area 8
     Market Area 26       No Restrictions
     Market Area 27       No Restrictions
     Market Area 32       No Restrictions
     Market Area 35       No Restrictions
     Market Area 36     * No restrictions for southern part of Market Area 36.
                         Primary receipts/deliveries only for gas delivered
                      in the northern portion of Market Area 36. *
     Market Area 38       No Restrictions
     Market Area 39       No Restrictions
     Market Area 40       No Restrictions

Operating Area 10
     Market Area 28       No Restrictions
     Market Area 30       No Restrictions
     Market Area 31       No Restrictions

If you have any questions, please contact your Account
Representative.


Please note the following changes:
Ameren Services Company (ASC)
Assigned its sales agreement to:
Ameren Energy, Inc. as agent (ASC)
(for and on behalf of Union Electric Company d/b/a Ameren UE, Ameren Energy
Marketing Company, and Ameren Energy Generating Company)
Transmission remains with Ameren Services Company


Hi Marie -- I had come around to touch base with you on this but had missed you.  When this revised template is available, will you be able to help by installing the references to the various master contracts between Enron afilarttes and AEP which would be referenced?  Ed Sacks is our credit contact.  I will touch base with you on this -- I am hoping to get copies of those underlying masters also (I already have the wholesale power masters, and can provide you a copy of each, if you need them). Thanks. --David

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Portz, David
Sent:	Wednesday, October 31, 2001 11:51 AM
To:	Cook, Mary
Subject:	RE: Master Netting Without Margin/Collateral Provisions

Thanks for the update.  Your draft will used with AEP, which is on a fast time frame. --David

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cook, Mary
Sent:	Wednesday, October 31, 2001 11:46 AM
To:	Antonoff, Rick; Aronowitz, Alan; Clark, Morris; Davis, Angela; Del vecchio, Peter; Douglas, Stephen H.; Evans, Mark (London Legal); Gray, Barbara N.; Hansen, Leslie; Heard, Marie; Hendry, Brent; Hodge, Jeffrey T.; Jones, Tana; Kalembka, Lech; Keohane, Peter; Koehler, Anne C.; Leite, Francisco Pinto; McCullough, Travis; Mellencamp, Lisa; Murphy, Harlan; Murray, Julia; Nemec, Gerald; Portz, David; Rohauer, Tanya; Sager, Elizabeth; Sayre, Frank; Shackleton, Sara; Simons, Paul; St. Clair, Carol; Van Hooser, Steve; Viverito, John; Williams, Jason R (Credit)
Subject:	Master Netting Without Margin/Collateral Provisions
Importance:	High

I am currently working on a form for the master netting without the CSA.  It is somewhat complicated--so if you have such a request, please await the new form.  Do not try to do it yourself.  Thank you.

Cordially,
Mary Cook
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith, 38th Floor, Legal
Houston, Texas 77002-7361
(713) 345-7732
(713) 646-3393 (fax)
mary.cook@enron.com


deal 597100
can you please ch the time to 2:00 p.m. not 2:00 a.m. for the exercise time.

---------------------- Forwarded by Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron on 05/01/2001
02:10 PM ---------------------------

Evelyn Metoyer
05/01/2001 02:02 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: option date - 597086

deal 597086
can you please ch the time to 2:00 p.m. not 2:00 a.m. for the exercise time.

Thanks


Let's not forget this one

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Calger, Christopher F.
Sent:	Thursday, December 06, 2001 7:22 PM
To:	Kitchen, Louise
Subject:	RE:

Dave Fuller should be on the West Gas Orig team.  He was accidentally included in structuring and then cut.  Tych likes him and so do we here in Portland.

Chris Calger
503-464-3735

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kitchen, Louise
Sent:	Thursday, December 06, 2001 1:49 PM
To:	Calger, Christopher F.; Belden, Tim
Subject:

 << File: NETCOPEOPLE612.xls >>

Louise Kitchen
Chief Operating Officer
Enron Americas
Tel:  713 853 3488
Fax: 713 646 2308


Shari, how do you want to handle this?
---------------------- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 02/02/2000 04:38 PM
---------------------------
From: Doug Paterson on 02/02/2000 02:59 PM MST
To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: BC Gas Utility

The commercial person from BC Gas called me today to complain about the
securities rep and warrant that we put in the confirm.  I thought I had
resolved this by having you guys amend the ISDA and then we could remove it
from the confirms.  She now tells me their position is that the rep and
warrant was not pre-negotiated and was not in place at the time they entered
the trades so they will not sign any confirms containing the rep & warrant
and further they will only "consider" signing the amendment.  I tried my best
to explain that there corporation could be harmed if they did not make the
representation and she seemed to be making a big deal over a non-commercial
point and she was the only counterparty to complain but I got nowhere.  Is it
possible to send them amended confirms without the rep & warrant before we
here back from them about the ISDA?  This would make them happy and get off
my back.  Let me know.

Thanks

Doug


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Linda Wehring/ET&S/Enron on 11/16/2000
10:16 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Ricki Winters                           11/16/2000 10:08 AM

To: Legale Black/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Robert Benningfield/ET&S/Enron@Enron,
Tangie Dykes/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Jamie Lynn/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Ruthe
Newman/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Debra Jasper/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Harry
Woodson/ET&S/Enron@Enron, MaryAnn Locknar/ET&S/Enron@Enron, James
Carr/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Jodie Floyd/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Albert
Hernandez/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Leonard Daily/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Jean
Blair/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Shirley Walden/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Jan
Moore/ET&S/Enron@Enron, John Buchanan/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Raetta
Zadow/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Lynn Blair/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Jean
Adams/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Larry Berger/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Nancy
Callans/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Pamela Carter/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Terry
Kowalke/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Jerry Wilkens/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Sherry
Forbish/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Chris Greaney/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Kathy
Sturr/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Joe Linhart/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Dale
Eldridge/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Martha Cormier/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Beverly
Miller/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Cynthia Rivers/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Linda
Ward/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Kathy Washington/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Ramona
Betancourt/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Draemer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Toby
Kuehl/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Tammy Jaquet/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Maggie
Matheson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Gerry Medeles/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Sheila
Nacey/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dale Ratliff/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Diana
Porter/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rick Dietz/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Karen
Brostad/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Elizabeth Brown/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Zuela
Carter/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Patricia Steele/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Linda
Trevino/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, John Williams/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Esther
Dasilva/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Larry Davis/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Richard
Hanagriff/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Alice Johnson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Alma
Green/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Nancy Bastida/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Alma
Carrillo/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Randy Janzen/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Janet
McDaniel/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Julia White/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Randy
Bryan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Amy Mulligan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Katherine
Perry/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dennis Lee/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Tracy
Minter/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Christine McEvoy/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Keith
Braswell/OTS/Enron@Enron, Josue Vasquez/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Sharon
Brown/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven January/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ava
Garcia/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Deborah Dunten/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Karen
Leslie/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Jeffrey Cochran/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Crandal
Hardy/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Bart Monden/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Robert
Munson/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Bill Swarthout/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Richard
Barry/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Bill Bell/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Margaret
Hall/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Edward Welsh/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Jesse
Alvarado/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Steve Coash/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Michael
Ellington/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Ron Spain/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Christopher
Tracy/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Roy Armitage/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Rodney
Barnes/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Helen Cummings/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Gaynel
Henley/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Mike Bryant/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Michael
Wagoner/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Donald Angeletti/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Loren
Charbonneau/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Byron Reid/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Donna
Sander/OTS/Enron@ENRON, David Velen/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Jodi
Dobrinski/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Thomas Hebert/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Lynda
Laferla/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Galen Coon/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Laura
Giambrone/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Karen Clapper/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Mary
Phillips/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Jack Howard/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Marion
Collins/FGT/Enron@ENRON, James Cramer/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Tim
Cooper/FGT/Enron@ENRON, William Aldinger/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Hilda
Lindley/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Shahnaz Lakho/FGT/Enron@ENRON, James
Studebaker/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Darrell Schoolcraft/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Gary
Spraggins/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Moore/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Steven
Chambers/OTS/Enron@Enron, Faith Reid/OTS/Enron@Enron, Dannis
Bellard/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Donna Scott/FGT/Enron@ENRON, John
Sturn/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Connie Hook/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Linda Wehring/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Candace
Williams/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Confidential Conference Access Code Change!!!

Please be advised that effective immediatley we have changed the passcode for
the daily morning conference call.  The 800 number will remain the same (800)
991-9019, with a new passcode of 6133683#.

This code is extremely confidential, so please do not share with anyone
outside of ETS!

Connie, Candace & Linda, could you please forward this on to your groups, and
if you have any employees in need of this information that are out, please
leave the new passcode on their phone mail.

Thank you,
Ricki


The following News Release is also available online:

http://www.energy.ca.gov/releases/

*********************************************************

For immediate release: December 27, 2001
Contact: Percy Della - 916-654-4989

Low Interest Energy Loans
Approved for Three Agencies

Sacramento - The California Energy Commission has approved low-interest State loans of almost $2.6 million for energy efficiency projects in the East Bay Municipal Utility District, the Los Angeles Community College District and Humboldt County.

East Bay MUD, based in Oakland, will receive over $1.9 million in funds to install 12 60-kilowatt natural-gas fired microturbines at its Administration Center and a 30-kW photovoltaic (PV) system on the roof of its Operations Center.

The microturbines will trim the district's energy costs by over $431,000, based on new Pacific Gas and Electric rate schedule. The planned PV project has obtained a 50 percent PG&E rebate and will further reduce energy bills by $7500 a year. The projects will trim the district's on-peak and mid-peak energy use by 35 percent.

Simple payback period for the microturbine project is 5.6 years and 9 years for the PV system.

The LA Community College District has requested a loan for over $436,000 to install a 140-kW PV system at its East Los Angeles College. The college has recently made lighting and comfort system improvements but would like to produce renewable energy to reduce energy costs by about $48,000 annually. Reduced energy bills will enable the District to pay back the loan in nine years.

Humboldt officials will use about $130,000 in loans to improve heating and make lighting retrofits at the County courthouse and other buildings. Once done, the improvements will enable the county to reduce energy costs by at least $23,000 yearly. At the same time, the county will be able to reduce electrical consumption by 37 kilowatts. Savings from the projects alone will enable the county to repay the loan way ahead of the required 11-year payback period.

The loans were made under the Energy Conservation Assistance Act. To encourage energy efficiency, the act grants energy loans at a low 3 percent interest rate for local governments, schools from K-12, special districts, public and private care facilities, community college districts and other agencies.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
If you would like to unsubscribe from this
list.  Please use our form located at:

http://www.energy.ca.gov/html/listservers.html

Nancy Hassman
California Energy Commission
Web Team

* * * * * * * * * *  * * * * * * * * * *   * * * * * * * * * *


Hi Susan-

I sent the note below today to your other email account. Friday, January 11
is a good day for you to visit us.

When I sent the note below, I had forgotten that Jaquelyn Lewis was on
vacation this week. Please send me a reply if you would like our assistance
arranging travel, and I will ask my administrative assistant, Carol Nelson,
to help you.  Alternatively, if you book your own airfare and hotel, we will
reimburse you.

We look forward to seeing you.

- Julie Ryan

> ----------
> From: 	Ryan, Julia M
> Sent: 	Wednesday, January 02, 2002 8:00 AM
> To: 	'Susan Scott'
> Cc: 	Lewis, Jacquelyn
> Subject: 	RE: Office Visit
>
> Susan-
>
> Friday, January 11 works well for us.  I have asked Jaquelyn Lewis to
> contact you to help arrange travel for you.  Jaquelyn's telephone numer is
> 425- 462-3215 if you need to reach her.
>
> We look forward to seeing you soon.  Please feel free to call me with any
> questions you have.
>
> Regards,
> Julie Ryan
> 425-462-3331
>
> ----------
> From: 	Susan Scott[SMTP:susan_m_scott@hotmail.com]
> Sent: 	Sunday, December 30, 2001 4:19 PM
> To: 	Julia.Ryan@pse.com
> Subject: 	Re: Office Visit
>
> Julie,
>
>    I wanted to thank you again for taking the time to speak with me last
> Friday.  I appreciated hearing what you had to say regarding the position
> and look forward to discussing it further with yourself and the rest of
> the
> group.  Also, the additional information you emailed was very helpful in
> getting a better grasp of the role you are looking to fill with Puget.  I
> have had a chance to look at my schedule for the week of January 7th and
> believe that meeting that Friday, the 11th, would work best for myself.
> You
> may reach me via email or by phone at 713-775-6472(M) to let me know if
> the
> timing works for you as well.
>    Once again, I am eager to hear more about the company, the portfolio
> and
> the direction you are hoping to take the group.  The position sounds like
> an
> exciting opportunity and one with definite interest to  myself.
>
> Thank you,
> Susan Scott
>
>
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com
>
>


Idaho Power Company, dba IdaCorp Energy, the utility (IPC) has assigned the majority of their trades to IDACORP Energy, LP.  The trades that IPC retained are as follows:

44573.2
411583
414014
414013
416067
562415
562414

If you trade in the future with either of these CPs, please book them with the appropriate CP.  Thanks for your help.


I just heard back from Jeff on these deals - apparently he's hiding his trade
log now to keep his secrets safe! Well that didn't work too well for us
today, because the two missing deals were right there at the bottom....with
no deal numbers! Anyway, Jeff said he'd enter these in the morning, and if
you hear anything from Prebon in the meantime, these are good deals.

Thanks,
Kate

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
03/26/2001 01:58 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: 3/26 Checkout

BLOOMBERG
All deals checked out fine.

PREBON

Jeff Richter:
I am missing the following deals:
1) Enron buys from Duke June NP-15 at $260.00
2) Enron sells to Calpine June NP-15 at $261.00

AMEREX WEST
All deals checked out fine.


You are correct on the arrow.  No Janet is seeing this for the first time.  I've talked to her regarding we need to have coordination rules and this is our attempt at that issue.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kitchen, Louise
Sent:	Wednesday, March 14, 2001 11:44 AM
To:	Sukaly, Bruce
Subject:	Re: EA and EES in ERCOT

I think the bottom arrow is supposed to be a No - or is that just me misinterpreting the diagram.  Is this something which was just agreed by  you and Janet or how long was it in place beforehand?

Thanks
Louise

From:	Bruce Sukaly/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/14/2001 11:12 AM
To:	Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janet R Dietrich/HOU/EES@EES
cc:

Subject:	EA and  EES in ERCOT

Attached is the flow chart that the EA ERCOT team developed regarding Enron's customer approach in Texas.  If you have any questions please call (x39796). << File: EA EES Customer Interaction.ppt >>


Dear Steve

We need your feedback to better define leadership development for WEI.

As you may be aware the WEI Board has approved recommendations on how WEI
should evaluate our activities and then recognize the many people who
contribute to their design, development and delivery.  We will clearly
standardize how we evaluate "what" WEI does.  However, due to the very
different approaches used in the past to develop programs and people, the
Committee sees a strong to need clarify what members desire when it comes to
industry specific leadership development.

Following are a list of possible components of a WEI Industry Specific
Leadership Development program.  Will you please take a few minutes to rate
these components based on the value to you and to your organization?

To participate in the survey, simply reply to this email and hit send upon
completion.  And feel free to offer comments where appropriate.  Thank you
in advance for helping us by sharing your experiences and opinions.

Please rate the following components.
5 = essential
4 = important
3 = nuetral
2 = unnecessary.
Simply enter your rating at the front of each item.

(   ) Expand industry knowledge
(   ) Expand understanding of my work discipline
(   ) Develop increased confidence in groups
(   ) Develop/improve facilitation skills
(   ) Develop/improve public speaking
(   ) Learn to lead a group
(   ) Learn to effectively run a meeting
(   ) Improve self confidence in my work discipline
(   ) Learn to develop group consensus
(   ) Other, please list ______________________________________________

As a participant in the past, please name the three most important
leadership skills you feel you have gained through active participation.
1.
2.
3.

Also, please identify the single most important leadership related benefit
you have gained through active participation.
1.

(   ) I don't believe WEI should provide industry specific leadership
development

Thank you for your feedback and for your terrific involvement in WEI!

Terry Sullivan
President


Start Date: 10/5/01; HourAhead hour: 8;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001100508.txt

Error retrieving HourAhead price data - process continuing...


Mike - thanks.   mcs

Steve - FYI.  mcs

Mike Dahlke@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
06/07/2000 14:09
To: Mark Schroeder@ECT
cc: Stella Chan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Korean Electric Restructuring - status

Mark,

"Early July" is upon us and it seems that the Electric Restructuring bill has
yet to be re-introduced in the Korean National Assembly.  I believe there is
about one month left in this session, which seems like a very short time to
consider such important legislation.  It seems the government has made
restructuring the banking system its first priority for this meeting of the
Assembly.  Commentators on the Korean economy have been consistent in
expressing concern about the state of the banking and insurance industries
where cosmetic changes have occurred but fundamental reforms have been few
and far between.  Mergers of many banks appear urgent to salvage a few strong
banks that can be competitive in a global capital marker.  However, there is
resistance both from both executives and labor.  With a new coalition,
President Kim may feel that he has to focus his efforts and not risk having
the electric reform "tabled" a second time, particularly if it might mean
facing the combined protest of the Banking and Electric sector unions.  There
is still some time yet for the Electricity to make on the agenda and the
evidence indicates the Administration remains committed to pushing forward
with Energy sector reforms.  Practically, however, the public debate may not
occur until this Fall.

I will let you know as I learn more about the status.

Mike D.


Congressional Republicans Draft Energy Bill to Aid the West
Rep. Joe Barton has spliced together emergency legislation aimed at aiding energy markets in the Western United States via funding for improvements in California's constrained transmission line SP-15 and directing federal disaster officials to prepare for power outages.  The move by Republicans came as Democratic criticism of the Bush administration's response to the California power crisis intensified Wednesday.  Although the bill will not contain the price caps sought by Democrats and a handful of Republicans, Barton said he would allow amendments in support of price controls during committee deliberations.  A list circulated by GOP staff in recent weeks includes a range of ideas such as relaxing environmental rules, subject to a governor's request; increasing federal energy assistance to low-income consumers; firing up mothballed power plants; and directing federal facilities to reduce energy use by 10%.  Additionally, the bill would grant governors the flexibility to allow power plants that have exceeded emissions limits to temporarily keep operating during emergencies.


----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 10/16/2000 09:26 PM -----

	Hiroko Ono
	10/16/2000 05:18 AM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Gary
Hickerson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ken Rice/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Anthony Duenner/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
mike.mcconnell@enron.com, jeff.shankman@enron.com, mark.frevert@enron.com,
Paul Chivers/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT@ECT, Jackie
Gentle/LON/ECT@ECT, Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Philippe A Bibi/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Tom McKeever/EU/Enron@Enron, Fiona Grant/LON/ECT@ECT, Jim
Thompson/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Brian Stanley/EU/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron, Cindy Derecskey/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Stella L Ely/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kelly Kimberly/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, cathy.phillips@enron.com, Beverley Ashcroft/LON/ECT@ECT,
Tracy Ralston/EU/Enron@ENRON, Liz M Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anita
Lynch/EU/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Enron Japan Office Opening Party

Thank you for indicating your intention to attend the office opening.

Attached please find guest information checklist.

It would be grateful if you could arrange to complete and return the
checklist by e-mail at your earliest convenience.

Best regards,

Hiroko Ono
Assistant to Joe Hirl


Please mark your calendars.  Emory Ireland and Martin Weinstein of Foley &
Lardner will be conducting a presentation regarding the nuts and bolts of
Letters of Credit on Wednesday, May 23, 2001 from 8:45 a.m. to 10:00 a.m. in
EB5C2.  Please RSVP to Carolyn George at ext. 33439 or
carolyn.george@enron.com if you plan to attend.

Thank you,

Julia Heintz Murray
Enron Wholesale Services
Enron Industrial Markets LLC
1400 Smith Street, EB3838
Houston, TX  77002
(713) 853-4794
Fax:  (713) 646-3393
julia.murray@enron.com


Jeff,

Chris told me you are helping us to update FEA @Energy2.1.  What is status now ?

We are testing FEA storage model, could you install the license key for the storage model ASAP
because it will be expire in 20 days.  So please help !  If you could get it done today .....

Zimin

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Sue Choi" <sue@fea.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Sue+20Choi+22+20+3Csue+40fea+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Thursday, May 31, 2001 6:28 PM
To:	Lu, Zimin
Subject:	storage beta

Hi Zimin,

This key should be installed on your FEA license server.

Server code: 30784/8254654498510533729072764
Expiration date: Fri Jun 22 23:59:59 2001 (22.32 days from now.)
Key: 7218 2803 2744 2904 4151 1632 9

If you currently do not have any FEA software installed on your PC, install
any FEA product on your PC and select 'product purchase' and 'use license
server from my network'.

The attached zipped file contains a template, the Excel add-in and
documentation.  After the key has been installed, simply open the template
and double click on the energy32_5.xll to activate the program.

Feel free to contact me with any comments or questions.

Best,

Sue

Financial Engineering Associates, Inc.
2484 Shattuck Ave. Ste 225
Berkeley, CA 94704
tel. 510-548-6200
fax. 510-548-0332

 - Storage2.zip


================================================================
As requested, your News Alert for YHOO
follows from EquityAlert.com.
To edit/discontinue your alerts please refer to end of message.
PLEASE REVIEW THE NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER BELOW
================================================================

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-= Paid Advertisement -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Looking for an emerging growth company expanding into China.

Search no more. Kanakaris Wireless (OTC BB: KKRS) recently signed
a contract  to begin airing TV commercials in China, no later than
Thanksgiving. This will have immediate impact on the 45 million
per week viewing audience, because of the appeal of American
television and movies.

For more information on the worldwide rollout, and its compelling
impact on cinemapop.com, click here at
http://205.210.134.51/a1.asp?ID=1268aa

AOL USERS: copy & paste the link above into your browser.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

ChefShop.com Chosen as Best Food Site by Yahoo! Internet Life
Magazine=ChefShop.com Supplants Tavolo.com to Be One of 13 Best Shopping Sites
of 2000

SEATTLE, Dec 13, 2000 /PRNewswire via COMTEX/ -- Yahoo! Internet Life has
named
ChefShop.com the Best Food site on the Web. Yahoo! Internet Life evaluated
hundreds of sites according to content, convenience, community, commerce and
customer care. ChefShop.com beat out Yahoo's prior favorite site, Tavolo.com,
and all other sites to be designated Best Food site of 2000.

Yahoo! Internet Life magazine chose ChefShop because of its superb inventory
and
exemplary customer service. Yahoo! likens ChefShop to "a gourmet boutique
filled
with goodies that would excite even professional chefs."

"Product descriptions are well-written, informative, succinct,
fun-to-read-beating out Tavolo's by a taste bud," writes Leslie Brenner. "Site
design is clean, attractive and intelligent, with a category list that remains
on the left side of the page as you browse, so it's always easy to go
elsewhere
in one click. The site also provides exemplary customer service, efficient
handling of orders, and timely shipping at very reasonable prices."

"ChefShop.com is thrilled to be chosen Best Food site on the Web by Yahoo!
Internet Life," says ChefShop.com president and CEO Tim Mar. "ChefShop's
mission
is to share our passion for cooking and eating high-quality food. We offer
1,500
imported and domestic hand-chosen, gourmet specialty foods and ingredients
including vintage-dated olive oils, organic marmalades, artisan pastas and
exotic teas. ChefShop believes strongly in our message -- Eat Simply, Eat
Well."

About ChefShop.com

ChefShop.com offers 1,500 of the finest quality artisan-produced gourmet
foods,
ingredients, and gifts hand-chosen from around the world. ChefShop.com also
features weekly food articles highlighting cooking trends, entertaining,
cooking
advice, and seasonal information. ChefShop.com offers convenient, easy and
secure online ordering from its website, or stop by our shop at 1435 Elliott
Avenue West, in Seattle. Customers can also order via fax, 206-282-5607,
phone,
toll free, 877-337-2491, or email, shopkeeper@chefshop.com. This holiday
season,
"Eat Simply, Eat Well!"(TM)

SOURCE ChefShop.com, Inc.

CONTACT:          Kristina Kolerich, 253-735-5620, or kkolerich@msn.com, or
Wendy Ellis, 425-837-9305, or wendyruns@msn.com, both for ChefShop.com, Inc.

URL:              http://www.chefshop.com
http://www.prnewswire.com

(C) 2000 PR Newswire.  All rights reserved.

-0-

KEYWORD:          Washington
INDUSTRY KEYWORD: FOD
MLM
REA

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-= Paid Advertisement -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Looking for an emerging growth company expanding into China.

For more information on the worldwide rollout, and its compelling
impact on cinemapop.com, click here at
http://205.210.134.51/a1.asp?ID=1269aa

AOL USERS: copy & paste the link above into your browser.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

****************** TO EDIT YOUR EQUITY ALERTS ********************
To unsubscribe or edit your alerts, visit
http://www.equityalert.com/alerts.asp?uid=alewis34&xid=40352
******************************************************************

***IMPORTANT NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER REGARDING THIS COURTESY EMAIL**
At your request, as a subscriber to our service, this email alert
is being sent to you as a courtesy and is for information purposes
only.  We are a financial news re-distributor.  We are not an
investment advisory and do not purport to tell or suggest which
companies you should monitor or which securities you should
purchase or sell.
In addition to the information regarding the company you are
monitoring (the &Monitored Company8), this email contains an
advertisement describing a product, service or company for which we
received a fee, at our normal advertising rates of $55 per 1,000 e-
mails (subject to volume and other discounts), from the advertising
company.  In addition, not withstanding our policy of prohibiting
employees from buying or selling securities of an advertising
company for a period of 20 days following dissemination of the
advertisement, we may not be able to effectively monitor our
employees to ensure compliance with the same. Consequently, there
may be sales and/or purchases of such securities by our employees
prior to, during and immediately following the dissemination of the
advertisement.
Please note that (1) this email may not contain the full text of
the press release issued by, or the research or other reports
regarding, the Monitored Company; and (2) the text of the
advertisement, the press release and/or reports were obtained from
third party sources and were not written, generated or edited by
us; accordingly, we make no representations or give any assurance
as to the accuracy or completeness, nor have we conducted any
independent investigations of, the disclosures regarding the
subject matter of such releases and reports.
Please note that links to the advertising company and/or Monitored
Company are provided for your convenience.  We assume no obligation
for the content of such sites.
All information contained herein should be independently verified
by you with the advertising company or with Monitored Company or
any other sources you prefer.
[THIS IS ONLY A SUMMARY OF, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO, THE &EQUITYALERT SUBSCRIBER AGREEMENT AND
DISCLAIMER.8 PLEASE VISIT
http://www.equityalert.com/home/disclaim.asp
FOR ACCESS TO OUR COMPLETE DISCLAIMER]
******************************************************************


Here's a revised version of the severence/policy memo.  Michele, should we discuss how to address the severence plan in an email?  I included an alternative here to direct people to a website with the plan.


Scott,

As I preliminary answer, this language hasn't been approved by Deffner's
group, although it is based on language they have seen before.  It was my
understanding that you wanted to keep this deal off their radar screen, as
you didn't want them entering into the structuring picture until later.  We
can ask for a blessing on the language, but that will probably lead to
questions about how the deal will be structured, etc.  I am happy to access
the resources in their group, however.

FCE hasn't seen any of this language.  It was something I pulled together for
you to look at.

As for FCE's desire to assign in case of merger, etc, I think the language is
too broad.  In fact, I think assignment by them should require our consent.
Otherwise, it needs to be conditioned on the acquiring party to be acquiring
a bunch of stuff:  the know how, the patent rights, the manufacturing
facilities, etc.  If they are going to merge with another company or sell
their shares, they don't need an assignment clause, unless there is something
peculiar in Conn. law.  They only need assignment language for an asset sale.

Kay

	From:  Scott Healy @ ECT                           11/10/2000 11:30 AM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Stephen Plauche/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: Assignment

Questions/Comments:

1. How do we handle assignments to state agencies like CRRA...will they be
rated in the fashion described?
2.  Shouldn't the credit standard only apply if it is an assignment of
obligations?  Why would this apply if it were only rights?
3.  Isn't #2 the same as #3, except with no specific ownership requirement.
My reading of #2 is that it allows #3, but #3 narrows #2
4.  My guess is that FCE will want condition 6(a) to apply to all the
assignments.
5.  Has anyone from Deffner's group approved this language?
6.  My guess is that FCE will reject this language as being too broad.  Have
you run it by them?
7.  For condition #1 to apply to CRRA, would we have to assign the agreement
to CRRA and then to the project financing?  The most likely scenario is this,
so we should make certain that it can happen under the agreement.
8.  What about the acquisition language that FCE proposed.  Assignment should
be allowed if Purchaser is acquired.


Let's try this again.


I will be leaving the office today at 5:30 p.m.

Cheryl Nelson
Senior Counsel
EB3816
(713) 345-4693


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	EB2378 - Georgeanne Hodges (West Schedule C's)

Date:		4/26/2001
Time:		3:00 PM - 3:30 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Stacey W White

Detailed Description:


Received the following additional information late yesterday from Speaker Hertzberg's chief of staff regarding Direct Access in the legislation working its way through the Assembly.  He relayed the information during an informational hearing that an Assembly committee had on the bill yesterday in Sacramento.  See previous note attached below for more a detailed description of DA provisions in the bill:

A new print of the bill is likely to be issued today.
With respect to DA, the Governor is apparently responsible for the temporary suspension of DA in the bill.
Assembly Ds and other market participants lobbied him hard, explaining that, since the bill covers all costs of bonds and DWR contracts through "exit fees," there is no reason to suspend DA.
The Governor is resisting hard, stating that "he wants time for the market to stabilize."
So it looks like the Governor's plan is to 1) have a bill that provides for Direct Access as of 1.1.03 and 2) have the PUC "temporarily suspend" DA from September 1 to 1.1.03.
We're continuing to work with with business customers to eliminate, or significantly shorten, the suspension.
The bill apparently will also have amendments stating that any customer who has switched by August 23, 2001 (yesterday) will not be responsible for any DWR going forward contracts.  The customer will have to pay for any power consumed that DWR purchased on the IOUs' behalf between Jan 17 and the date of the switch.
The bill apparently will require that any customer switching between yesterday and Sept 1 be responsible for DWR going forward contracts (though details of how that would work were not clear).
The stated reason for wanting to insert an amendment on the August 23rd date is to prevent a "rush" to Direct Access between now and Sept 1.
There are currently NO efforts to break or othewise dissallow any contracts signed prior to Sept 1.
Finally, the bill apparently will also give self-generation priority over Direct Access in each "open season." The bill would set aside 250 MW of the short position each year for customers to do self gen.  If the self gen is not subscribed, the MWs would go to DA.
The bill, including these amendments and other amendments related to other issues, is supposed to be released today.
The bill will be heard in the Assembly committee on Monday afternoon.
We continue to work with the business customers to improve the DA and self gen provisions.
It remains unclear whether there is sufficient support for the bill to pass the Assembly.
The politicians are very reluctant to pass any "Edison bail out bill" and the political pressure not to vote on any "bailout" is significant and growing.  But the Governor is working the bill very hard.
Mirant is actively working against the bill.
Mirant is passing around a poll allegedly showing that any member that votes for a "bailout" could lose re-election.  Mirant is also distributing a letter implicitly threatening to take Edison into involuntary bankruptcy if the bill passes.
The bill also has to make it through the Senate.  Our lobbyist had a conversation yesterday with the Senate President, John Burton, who said flatly that "he's not doing anything."  But there is much to trade in the final weeks of the session, and the possibility of Burton doing a deal is 50-50.
With respect to the bill's provisions preventing Edison from paying wholesale providers with the "dedicated rate component" included,  Edison representatives at the hearing yesterday announced that Edison intends to issue first mortgage bonds to pay the suppliers.  Edison also said that, under the Assembly version of the bill, Edison believes that it would have the borrowing capacity to issue the first mortgage bonds.

More info to follow as it becomes available.  If anyone has any questions, don't hesitate to contact me.

Best,
Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Wednesday, August 22, 2001 8:08 PM
To:	 [Dasovich, Jeff]
Subject:	Latest Legislative Version of Direct Access --08.22.01

The following is a summary of the Direct Access provisions in the bill language released this afternoon reflecting the deal that Davis cut with Assembly.  Things are very fluid and these provisions could change significantly.

I was just informed by the large business customers that they just met with the Davis' and Hertzberg's staff and the staff have agreed to amend the DA provisions to make them considerably more favorable for customers and suppliers.  They also said that favorable provisions with respect to self-gen would also be added to the bill. They said that these new amendments could come out as early as tonite or tomorrow morning and that the bill may be heard tomorrow.

Note:  In addition to the DA provisions, the bill also includes provisions that 1) explicitly recognize the PX Credit as part of Edison's undercollection, and 2) permit Edison to pay debts associated with the negative PX credit. (The bill does not authorize Edison to pay power suppliers, however, and leaves that portion of Edison's debt for Edison's management and shareholders to address.)

Summary of Direct Access provisions:

The program would begin January 1, 2003.
It's unclear what would happen to DA between now and January 1, 2003.  Presumably, the decision to suspend, or not, between now and then would stay with the California PUC.
90 days after the effective date of the bill, and every 6 months thereafter, DWR would provide information to the PUC showing the net short position.
Every 6 months, the PUC would hold an open season permitting customers to switch to DA.
20 KW-and-above customers would have 60 days to decide to switch once the PUC has announced the open season; under 20kw customers would have 180 days.
Customers who switch to DA would be responsible for paying 1) the customer's proportionate share of the utility's undercollection and 2) the customer's proportionate share of DWR's receivables (if any) for power previously delivered by DWR (but not yet fully paid for by customers).
In addition, if the number of customers who elect to choose to go DA in the open season exceeds the net short, then DA customers will have to pay their proportionate share of any DWR stranded contract costs.
If the number of DA customers does not exceed the net short position, then no stranded contract cost fees would be assessed.

Best,
Jeff


Sounds good to me.

Herman Manis
06/26/2000 12:33 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: ABB transformer purchase

Ok to discuss today after 3 pm meeting?

To: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Bills/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Matthew
Berry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Roseann Engeldorf/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Herman
Manis/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kathleen Clark/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:
Subject: ABB transformer purchase

I'm circulating some language for the ABB transformer purchase agreement.
Please let me know if you have any problem with the language.

The buy back language is new.  The assignment language is intended to address
some concerns raised by ABB - the changes are marked in red.

Buy back option.  (5.4.3)

At Purchaser,s option, Seller will arrange for storage of the Unit or Units
to be stored for up to one year following the successful conclusion of
factory testing.  Purchaser shall pay the Purchase Amount in full, and will
pay the actual storage charges, billed quarterly during the year the Unit or
Units are stored.  Title and risk of loss shall be with Purchaser during this
storage period.  Purchaser shall have the right (but not the obligation) to
sell the Unit(s) back to Seller for 30% of Purchase Amount of the Unit(s)
after the end of the one year storage period.  Payment will be due 30 days
after receipt of written notification by Purchaser of its intent to exercise
this option.  Title and risk of loss shall be with Seller as of the time of
payment.

If Purchaser desires to sell the Unit(s) prior to the expiration of the one
year storage period, Purchaser may request, and Seller agrees to act, as
broker for the re-sale of the Unit(s). The terms of the remarketing agreement
will be subject to mutual agreement.

Changes to assignment language.

22.2   Assignment by Purchaser.  This Agreement or any right or obligation
contained herein may be assigned, from time to time, by Purchaser without
Seller,s consent to:

(i) Agent (in the case of an assignment by Purchaser) or an Affiliate of
either WestLB or Agent;

(ii) a joint venture, partnership, limited liability company or other similar
entity in which Agent or any of its Affiliates is a venturer, partner or
participant with no less than a nineteen and one-half percent (19.5%) equity
interest;

(iii) any Lender;

(iv) any Indemnified Party;

(v) any entity for the purposes of financing or sale of the Facility;

(vi) any party (1) for which Agent or any of its Affiliates has agreed to
construct or develop a facility using the Equipment, or (2) to which the
Agent or any of its Affiliates has agreed to convey a power plant project
which it has under development; or

(vii) any contractor or developer (including, without limitation, Enron
Engineering & Construction Company and/or NEPCO) which is retained by Agent
or any of its Affiliates to construct or develop a Facility using the
Equipment.

In the case of an assignment to a party described in (ii), (vi), or (vii)
(other than  Enron Engineering & Construction or NEPCO), Seller shall be
entitled to request and receive an appropriate guaranty, letter of credit,
payment bond or other reasonable form of payment security, in amount not to
exceed the amount of the Purchase Amount remaining to be paid at the time of
the assignment, unless the assignor agrees to remain liable for all future
liabilities under this Agreement.  A letter of guaranty, letter of credit, or
payment bond provided by an entity rated BBB+ or better shall be deemed to be
an appropriate form of security for the purpose of this provision.

Except for (i) through (vii) above, this Agreement may not be assigned by
Purchaser to other parties without the prior written consent of Seller which
shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed.  Seller agrees to
respond to any request for consent within thirty (30) Days following its
receipt of such request.  Any failure to respond within the foregoing time
period shall be deemed to be a grant by Seller of its consent to the proposed
assignment.  In determining whether Purchaser shall be permitted to assign
this Agreement, Seller shall only be deemed to be reasonable in withholding
its consent if the proposed assignee does not have substantially the same or
better credit quality than Agent unless (a) the proposed assignee provides
appropriate guaranties, letters of credit or other assurances of payment
issued by an entity or person with substantially the same or better credit
quality than Agent, or (b) the assignor agrees to remain liable for all
future liability under this Agreement.  Purchaser shall have the right to
assign or pledge, from time to time, all or any portion of its right, title
and interest in, to and under the Agreement as collateral for financing of
any Facility without Seller,s consent.

When duly assigned in accordance with the foregoing (including, following any
collateral assignment, upon foreclosure by any collateral assignee) (i) this
Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the
assignee (and all rights hereunder, including, without limitation, any and
all warranty rights, shall be assigned to the assignee as if such assignee
were an original party hereto), and (ii) the assignor shall be irrevocably
relieved and forever discharged of all liability under this Agreement so long
as the assignee executes an assumption of such liabilities.  Any other
assignment by Purchaser shall be void and without force or effect.

Notwithstanding the generality of the foregoing, in connection with any
assignment permitted under this Section 22.2 to any assignee, the Purchaser
shall have the right, from time to time by Notice to Seller and without
Seller,s consent, to (i) designate such assignee to be the successor of
WestLB hereunder, (ii) designate such assignee to be the successor of
&Agent8 hereunder, (iii) designate such assignee as a sub-agent of the Agent
hereunder, and (iv) designate that such assignee has succeeded to all of the
rights and obligations of both WestLB and Agent, whereupon (notwithstanding
the first WHEREAS clause hereof, but subject to any subsequent appointment of
an &Agent8 hereunder) each reference to &Purchaser8 hereunder shall be deemed
a reference to such assignee acting in its individual capacity and each
reference to an &Agent8 herein shall be deemed deleted.

Upon any permitted assignment of the rights under this Agreement to acquire a
Unit or Units, and the assumption (in accordance with the terms hereof) of
the obligations related thereto, Seller shall enter into a separate purchase
agreement with the permitted assignee (each, a &Facility Agreement8).  The
terms of each Facility Agreement will be in strict conformity with the terms
and conditions of this Agreement, except for site specific changes as agreed
by the Seller and such assignee.  In no way shall the Facility Agreement
increase the liability or responsibility of Seller, Purchaser, or Agent under
this Agreement.

The parties further agree that the provisions of this Agreement relating to
assignment will only control the assignment of Purchaser,s or Agent,s rights
and obligations under this agreement prior to Acceptance of the Unit to be
assigned. Following Acceptance, Purchaser or Agent shall be permitted,
without Seller,s consent, to: (i) assign its rights under this Agreement,
(ii) convey any ownership interest that it may have in the Facility and/or
(iii) convey any ownership interest that it may have in the entity which may
own the Facility.


I tried to breakout the curves for Keith and Frank in the file you are working on but we should run that by them for approval.  Mike will be setting all gas daily and physical curves.  I think we can combine basis, index and GDI curves into one file per trader leaving only three curve files to load.

Let me know what you think.  Once we get their ok on the curves, we can set them up and let them add any formulas they need, especially Mikes file.

KK

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Grigsby, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 10:21 AM
To:	Keiser, Kam
Subject:	RE: new books

Two people will be setting curves for basis.  Keith Holst for CA curves and Frank Ermis for Rockies and Southwest curves. I will be setting curves for balance of the month.

Thanks,
Mike

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Keiser, Kam
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 9:03 AM
To:	Grigsby, Mike
Subject:	new books

Mike,

We will be setting up both physical and financial books for everyone.  I know not everyone will have physical but to keep it consistent everyone will have both just in case.  I have the 10 names you sent Jeff earlier, please let me know if that changes.  Do you know what the structure going to look like? ie.  will each trader be assigned specific curves/locations, cash vs. term, how many different people will be setting curves.

We will be starting over with our curve files also.  We want to only start with the true published curves.  We have many derived/internal curves that aren't necessary and if we need to create more curves we will look into it later.  Since the number of curves will be greatly reduced, we will probably start with one file.

Thanks
Kam

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Grigsby, Mike
Sent:	Wednesday, January 02, 2002 2:40 PM
To:	Keiser, Kam
Subject:	Zach McCarroll

Can you get together with Zach on Thursday or Friday and walk him through a simple book.  Take Jane Tholt's book and discuss Risk 101.

Send him an email with a time and place.

Thanks,
Mike


Ted, Bill and Sara,
ECT Investments Inc. is wanting to establish execution only agreements for
on-line trading for the Convertble and credit books.  These services are new
and the trading desk wants to be able to utilize.
We will establish only one relationship with ECT Investments Inc. at this
time and all clearance will be done through our prime brokers.  [Books are
maintained separately at all prime brokers.].
Sheila

---------------------- Forwarded by Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT on 18/08/2000 04:16
---------------------------

Mike Fowler@ENRON
17/08/2000 16:01
To: Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Madhur Dayal/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Online Trading Platforms

I'm working with Sara on legal issues related to Buy Side Direct.  Is my
understanding correct that approval from Risk Control and Credit is required
to initiate trading, and that you are requesting their approval for Buy Side
Direct as well as the other sites listed below ?

Please let me know if I should be involved in this process.  Any feedback
regarding expected timing of this approval would also be appreciated.

Thanks.

Mike
x39990

---------------------- Forwarded by Mike Fowler/Corp/Enron on 08/17/2000
01:55 PM ---------------------------

Mike Fowler
08/15/2000 10:21 AM
To: Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Kinneman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Madhur
Dayal/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Online Trading Platforms

I am requesting that online trading agreements be executed with the following
bond trading platforms which we are evaluating:

         Site   Initial Corporate Bond Categories *       Type  Site Status

Buy Side Direct   Convertibles (+ Equity Hedge)  ** Cross Matching  Aug 15th
Launch

Trading Edge / Bond Link High Yield, Convertibles   Cross Matching  Live

LIMITrader   High Yield, Convertibles   Cross Matching  Live

Market Axess   Investment Grade   Multi-Dealer ***  August Launch

*   Additional corporate bond categories may be added in the future.  For
example, Market Axess expects to add high yield and convertible bonds within
3  to 6 months.

** John Greene is aware that convertible bond transactions through Buy Side
Direct will involve offsetting equity hedges.

*** We have execution agreements in place with all current Market Axess
dealers.

Potential benefits offered by online sites include trading flows and improved
execution efficiency.  In addition, these sites provide opportunities for
generating demand for EnronCredit.com credit derivatives, given that users of
these sites are buyers or sellers of corporate credit risk.  The ability to
trade will greatly enhance our evaluation of these sites.

As noted above, 3 of the 4 sites are cross-matching, where trading is
completely anonymous and the site's sponsor or clearing firm are the nominal
counterparty for all trades.   One of the 4 sites will be a multi-dealer
system where counterparties transact directly with a particular dealer.

Trades for all sites would be cleared through prime brokers with whom we have
existing agreements.

As you suggested, we should ensure that agreements with online trading
platforms allow for trading by ENA, ECT Investments and EnronCredit.com.   My
understanding is that Sheila's group would coordinate the opening of any
additional accounts required to facilitate trading by each entity.

I suggest that Madhur Dayal be designated initially at the person to receive
notification of material changes to agreements.  We should retain the ability
to change this contact person.

Thanks.

Mike
x39990


---------------------- Forwarded by Ina Rangel/HOU/ECT on 05/14/2001 01:01 PM
---------------------------

Kimberly Bates
05/14/2001 12:52 PM
To: Tammi DePaolis/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ina Rangel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Airam
Arteaga/Enron@EnronXGate, Laura Vuittonet/Enron@EnronXGate, Becky
Young/Enron@EnronXGate
cc:
Subject: ICE Presentation

Pam Anderson from Intercontinental Exchange will be giving an ICE
presentation on May 22 in EB 32c2.  Please let me know if  you plan on
attending.


Good morning,
Hope you had a great holiday!

Bill


Twanda Sweet will coordinate with you to get the dial in number..

	Douglas Nichols/ENRON@enronxgate
	05/07/2001 12:04 PM

		 To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: AL ALEXANDERSON/ENRON@enronxgate, Joyce Harlan/ENRON@enronxgate, Karen
Lewis/ENRON@enronxgate, Laurie Hamlin/ENRON@enronxgate, ROBIN
TOMPKINS/ENRON@enronxgate
		 Subject: Thursday Call - Enron Coordination on California matters

Richard,
It was good seeing you last week.  To follow up on PGE participation in the
Thursday calls, could you send me the call in number and time?  We would have
Al Alexanderson, Robin Tompkins, and me participate.  Thanks.  dn


Please let me no whether or not you will be there.

This is our last game.


Ken:

Good idea!  Carol St. Clair is handling this agreement.  Please give her a
call at X33989.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 03/28/2001 10:09 AM -----

	Ken Curry/ENRON@enronXgate
	03/28/2001 08:32 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Inland

Sara,
Paul Radous passed the Inland Paperboard ISDA over to me.  (Thanks, Paul!)
Jim Crump forwarded me the 43 issues they had with the document.  Since I am
not familar with where we are, I would like to get together to talk about
their issues and decide how best to move forward.  Please let me know if you
have some time to get together.
Thanks,
      Ken Curry
 X 3-6165


I'll be out completely by Friday evening, and am finishing the list of
workers who done various projects on the house, and will have that to you
Friday as well via email.  I really appreciate your giving me the extra
time....

Jeff


Thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Perrino, Dave
Sent:	Friday, October 19, 2001 9:35 AM
To:	Steffes, James D.
Cc:	Alvarez, Ray
Subject:	FW: Operational Audit of CAISO by FERC

Jim,

The answer to your timing question is yes, the audit is supposed to be completed by mid-Jan 2002, auditing the period 10/00-10/01.

Dave

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Alvarez, Ray
Sent:	Thursday, October 18, 2001 1:44 PM
To:	Perrino, Dave
Subject:	FW: Operational Audit of CAISO by FERC

Dave, per your request:

Here are some bullets briefly describing the FERC audit high points.  I think the scope is "right on the money" and the timing is reasonably good also.  The text of the audit solicitation follows the bullets.  I've made contact with Andy Sakallaris, head of FERC procurement, to attend the pre-bid conference next Tuesday (assuming it is held, since expressions of interest thus far have been from CA based firms unwilling to make the trip to DC).  Ray

Audit description-  FERC seeks to take all appropriate steps for prospective improvements in California markets; accordingly, an independent operational audit of the CAISO will be performed to determine any areas in which the CAISO could enhance its effectiveness in fulfilling its responsibilities in operating the transmission system under its control and administering real-time energy markets.

Scope- Provide a comparison of the CAISO's actual operations and its FERC tariff and determine whether the CAISO's operations are adequately transparent to market participants.

Audit period- 10/1/00-10/1/01

Deliverables timing- Draft report due on January 9, 2002; final report due January 16, 2002.

Audit schedule-  Begins on November 1, 2001, and ends no later than January 4, 2002.

Pre-proposal conference- A conference is scheduled for prospective offerors at FERC next Tuesday; FERC will give a brief explanation of the requirements and clarify any questions asked.

PART: U.S. GOVERNMENT PROCUREMENTS
SUBPART: SERVICES
CLASSCOD: R--Professional, Administrative and Management Support
  Services
OFFADD: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), 888 First
  Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426
SUBJECT: R--OPERATIONAL AUDIT OF CALIFORNIA INDEPENDENT SYSTEM
  OPERATIOR. INC. CAISO
SOL FERC02RMT22071
DUE 102601
POC Charlotte Handley, 202-219-1156 or Andrew Sakallaris,202-219-1150
DESC: This is a combined synopsis/solicitation for commercial
  items prepared in accordance with the format in Subpart 12.6,
  as supplemented with additional information included in this
  notice. This announcement constitutes the only solicitation;
  proposals are being requested and a written solicitation will
  not be issued. FERC02RMT22071 is issued as a request for proposal
  and all provisions/clauses are those in effect through FAC
  97-27. This solicitation is unrestricted under NAICS number
  561. Statement of Work: I. BACKGROUND. The California electricity
  market has experienced great stress from Summer 2000 to Summer
  2001, with demand outstripping supply, wholesale prices rising
  dramatically, and key market participants becoming financially
  unstable. As a result, the California Independent System Operator,
  Inc. (CAISO), which operates the electricity transmission grid
  throughout most of California, was forced to adapt to rapidly
  changing circumstances. During all of this, the CAISO worked
  hard to ensure system reliability. Under the Federal Energy
  Regulatory Commission's market mitigation plan, wholesale prices
  stabilized in California in Summer 2001. The Commission seeks
  to take all appropriate steps for prospective improvements
  in California markets, including improvements to help the CAISO
  in effectively performing its increasing responsibilities.
  Accordingly, an independent operational audit of the CAISO
  will be performed to determine the areas, if any, in which
  the CAISO could enhance its effectiveness in fulfilling its
  responsibilities in operating the transmission system under
  its control and administering certain real-time energy markets.
  II. SCOPE OF WORK. The Independent Public Accounting (Contractor)
  firm shall perform an operational audit of the CAISO processes,
  practices, and procedures in accordance with Generally Accepted
  Government Auditing Standards (GAGAS). The Contractor shall
  provide a comparison of the CAISO's actual operations and its
  Commission tariff (procedures and tariff can be found at www.caiso.com).
  The Contractor shall ascertain whether the CAISO's operations
  are adequately transparent to market participants. To the extent
  possible, the Contractor shall also ascertain whether the CAISO's
  procedures and operations are consistent with the most effective
  business practice. III. AUDIT PERIOD. The audit of the CAISO
  shall cover the period commencing October 1, 2000, through
  October 1, 2001. IV. DELIVERABLES. The contractor must provide
  the Contracting Officer's Representative (COR) with a draft
  and final report detailing the findings, operating deficiencies
  and/or major observations and recommendations. These reports
  and other deliverables must be provided to the COR by the close
  of business on the following dates: 1) Draft Report - January
  9, 2002 2) Final Report - January 16, 2002. V. SCHEDULE. The
  operational audit will commence on November 1, 2001, and it
  must be completed no later than January 4, 2002. The contractor
  shall meet with the COR to discuss the audit no later than
  November 6, 2001. The contractor must provide the Commission
  with an operational audit plan no later than November 14, 2001.
  A detailed operational audit plan will be submitted to the
  COR for review, feedback, and approval. The COR or designated
  representative will review the plan. VI. Working Papers. The
  contractor shall prepare and provide a copy of work papers
  in accordance with GAGAS. All work papers shall include the
  purpose, sources of information, the procedures performed,
  results thereof, and conclusions as appropriate for the planning,
  internal control, compliance, and substantive testing phases.
  For all findings, work papers shall clearly show the condition
  or problem, criteria, cause, effect, and recommendation for
  improvement. All working papers shall be cross-referenced to
  audit programs, summaries, and final audit report. These documents
  will become the property of the Commission. During the course
  of the audit or upon completion of the audit work, the Contractor's
  audit report and work papers shall be subject to access and
  review by the Commission. A preproposal conference is scheduled
  for prospective offerors at FERC on Tuesday, October 16, 2001,
  at 10:00 am at 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426,
  Room 3M-3. FERC will give a brief explanation of the requirements
  and clarify any questions asked. Questions submitted in advance
  to A. Sakallaris (andrew.sakallaris@ferc.fed.us) is appreciated
  and preferable. Contractual, technical, and legal representatives
  will be on hand to answer any questions. Bring no more than
  three representatives and E-mail or phone A. Sakallaris, 202-219-1150
  to indicate the number and names of individuals attending.
  If unable to attend, E-Mail A. Sakallaris and provide the point
  of contact's mailing and E-mail address and FERC will arrange
  to deliver any additional information that may become available
  as a result of the pre-proposal conference. All offerors and
  subcontractors will complete and submit with their proposals,
  either the Organizational Conflicts of Interest (OCI) representation
  or the OCI disclosure (not both). Complete and submit the OCI
  Questionnaire. Request OCI information from A. Sakallaris.
  See DOE clauses 952.209-8 OCI-Disclosure and 952.209-72 OCI.
  Same/similar language will be incorporated into the resultant
  contract. Period of Performance: From approximately November
  1, 2001 to January 16, 2002. FAR Provision 52.212-1, Instructions
  to Offerors-Commercial (Oct 2000), applies. Addendum to FAR
  52.212-1 SUBPARAGRAPH (b) Reply by e- mail the proposal to
  FERC, ATTN: C. Handley, Division of Procurement, FA-12, 888
  First St, NE, Wash DC 20426, e-mail: charlotte.handley@ferc.fed.us.
  It is our intent to evaluate based on initial proposals. Offerors
  shall submit five copies of their price and technical proposal,
  signed by an official authorized to bind the offeror, at the
  above address no later than 2:00 PM local time, Friday, October
  26, 2001. Price Proposal: Addendum to FAR 52.212-1 SUBPARAGRAPH
  (b)(6): The price proposal shall be completely separate from
  the technical proposal. Offerors must breakout pricing by month
  and provide (1) labor categories (2) corresponding firm-fixed-price,
  fully loaded labor rates (3) proposed number of hours estimated
  for each labor category (4) Other Direct Costs as applicable
  (subcontractor and travel). Supporting details shall also be
  provided as appropriate (e.g., travel destinations, number
  of trips, computer time, discounts offered (excluding prompt
  payment)). Addendum to FAR 52.212-1 SUBPARAGRAPH (c) The offeror
  agrees to hold the prices in its offer firm for 120 calendar
  days. Provision 52.212-2, Evaluation-Commercial Items (Jan
  1999), applies. Addendum to FAR 52.212-2 SUBPARAGRAPH, (a)
  Technical Proposal: Past Performance (30 points). Ensure that
  the company names, points of contact and phone numbers are
  current. The Offeror and each subcontractor proposed must each
  select three references to complete a "Contractor Past-Performance
  Evaluation." All areas of the sheet must be filled in. If an
  answer to a specific question is not provided, the applicable
  area must be annotated with the reason why (e.g. "Reference
  failed to provide an answer"). Higher scores will be assigned
  for contracts that are at least similar in size and complexity.
  FERC may obtain and evaluate information from sources other
  than those provided by the offeror. FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iv) states
  "In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past
  performance or for whom information on past performance is
  not available, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or
  unfavorably on past performance." For the purposes of this
  evaluation not being evaluated favorably or unfavorably means
  the offeror will receive a rating of "good or acceptable" on
  company past performance. To obtain a copy of the past performance
  form to be completed by the Offeror's references, request from
  A. Sakallaris by email. The Offeror will be responsible and
  ensure that the references submit or reply by e-mail their
  completed response to C. Handley, located at the above address
  by 2:00 PM local time, October 26, 2001. Offerors should also
  notify the references that FERC may be contacting them regarding
  the past performance information. Prior Audit Experience (25
  points). The offeror must cover in its proposal the extent
  of prior related experience in electric bulk power markets,
  and the ability to effectively and efficiently conduct this
  operational audit in accordance with GAGAS. The proposal must
  include previous and/or current experience, within the last
  3 years, where the offeror has performed audits similar in
  terms of size and complexity of this requirement. Higher scores
  will be assigned to those offerors who have demonstrated successful
  experience in electric bulk power markets within the last three
  years. To be acceptable, the services must have been satisfactorily
  performed and at least similar in terms of size and complexity
  to the work required under this contract. Understanding the
  Statement of Work (20 points). The proposal must clearly demonstrate
  in sufficient and precise detail the offeror's expertise in
  understanding and analyzing independent system operator tariffs,
  market operations and services, and transmission issues. The
  offeror must describe its ability to perform a comprehensive
  and thorough analysis of the electric bulk power market operated
  by the CAISO. Higher scores will be assigned to those offerors
  who demonstrate an understanding and greater knowledge of independent
  system operator tariffs, market operations and services, and
  transmission issues. Higher scores will also be assigned to
  offerors who demonstrate a comprehensive understanding of bulk
  power markets like those operated by the CAISO. Audit Methodology
  and Quality Control (15 points). The technical proposal must
  include the audit methodology and must address each phase of
  the audit. The proposal must identify specific aspects of each
  phase and explain how each phase/aspect is related. The offeror
  must include estimated completion times for each phase of the
  audit and address critical completion dates. The technical
  proposal must describe the audit approach to documenting systems
  and internal controls, and effective procedures, including
  consideration of risk and materiality, to determine the extent
  of audit testing. Quality control is an important part of the
  technical proposal. The proposal must demonstrate the offeror's
  internal quality control procedures. The proposal must include
  a copy of the firm's latest peer review report, comments, and
  the response to the peer review report. Higher scores will
  be assigned to those offerors who demonstrate and offer a sound,
  valid, effective, and innovative audit methodology that reflects
  an understanding of the statement of work. "Valid" entails
  the use of techniques that are known to be feasible with respect
  to the area addressed; "Effective" refers to the workability
  and appropriateness of the methodology. "Innovative" means
  the development and application of a novel, yet valid technique
  that will increase the effectiveness of the approach. Higher
  scores will be assigned to offerors who demonstrate sound and
  effective internal quality control procedures. Professional
  Qualifications (10 points). The offeror must describe in its
  proposal: 1) the professional qualifications of the staff that
  will be assigned to this contract and 2) demonstrate that it
  has sufficient resources to perform the audit and qualified
  staff to perform critical tasks necessary to support the audit.
  The written response must also include the following information
  for all staff participating on the audit: Labor Category (i.e.,
  Partner, Manager, etc.); CPA certification date (if applicable);
  Other applicable certification(s); Total years of audit and/or
  other experience; Advance degree(s) obtained; and Total years
  employed by the offeror. Higher scores will be based on offeror's
  educational background, recent work experience, and certifications
  obtain by their staff. In particular, higher scores will be
  given to those who offer recent experience with independent
  system operator tariffs, market operations and services, transmission
  issues, and bulk power markets like those operated by the CAISO.
  Addendum to FAR 52.212-2 SUBPARAGRAPH (a). Technical and past
  performance, when combined, are more important than price.
  However, award shall be made to the offeror whose proposal
  is determined to best meet the needs of the Government after
  consideration of all factors i.e., provides the "best value."
  "Best value," for the purpose of the contract is defined as
  the procurement process that results in the most advantageous
  acquisition decision for the Government and is performed through
  an integrated assessment and trade-off analysis between technical
  and price factors. Include a completed copy of Provision at
  52.212.3, Offeror Representations and Certifications-Commercial
  Items (May 2001) with offer. Clause 52.212-4, Contract Terms
  and Conditions-Commercial Items (May 2001), applies. Addendum
  to FAR 52.212-4: 1. 52.252-2 Clauses Incorporated By Reference
  (FEB 1998). This contract incorporates one or more clauses
  by reference, with the same force and effect as if they were
  given in full text. Upon request, the Contracting Officer will
  make their full text available. Clauses are as follows: 52.217-8
  and 52.217-9. Clause 52.212-5, Contract Terms and Conditions
  Required To Implement Statutes or Executive Orders-Commercial
  Items (May 2001) applies. Addendum to FAR 52.212-5: The following
  clauses are incorporated by reference: 52.203-6 with A1; 52.219-4;
  52.219-8; 52.222-21; 52.222-26; 52.222-35; 52-222-36; 52.222-37;
  52.225-13; 52.225-15; 52.225-16; 52.232-33; 52.239-1. E-mail
  questions to C. Handley at charlotte.handley@ferc.fed.us. no
  later than October 19, 2001. E-Mail C. Handley of your intent
  to submit a proposal no later than October 19, 2001.
LINKURL: andrew.sakallaris@ferc.fed.us
LINKDESC: Click here to request copies of OCI questionnaire and <andrew.sakallaris@ferc.fed.us>
  the past performance form
EMAILADD: charlotte.handley@ferc.fed.us
EMAILDESC: charlotte.handley@ferc.fed.us <mailto:charlotte.handley@ferc.fed.us>
CITE: (W-282 SN5102V8)


I haven't looked at this yet, but I wanted to get it to you. I'll send the
terms and conditions separately.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 12/06/2000 05:33
PM ---------------------------

"Thompson, Peter J." <peterthompson@akllp.com> on 12/06/2000 05:30:01 PM
To: "Kay Mann (E-mail)" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc: "Pipitone, Paul" <paulpipitone@akllp.com>, "Cobb, Chris"
<chriscobb@akllp.com>

Subject: Exhibits to the CA Energy Development Agreements

  Attached please find clean and blackline versions of the exhibits to
the CA Energy Development Agreements.

To complete the exhibits, we need to include the following:

1. Exhibits B-1, H-2 and R need to be added.

2. Do we need to add language to section B of Exhibit A-1 because
these are dual fuel turbines?

3. Should the scope be changed in Exhibit B because these are dual
fuel turbines?

4. In Section 3.1 of Exhibit K, the terms "Specific Date" and
"Recovery Schedule" are not defined.

5. For Exhibit T, please confirm that Enron has received all of the
documents that it should have received by now.

6.  If required, we need to have a Seller Parent Guaranty for
Exhibit C-1.
 <<Exhibits to CA Development Turbine Agreement.DOC>>  <<Exhibits to CA
Energy Break-Out Agreements.DOC>>
 - Exhibits to CA Development Turbine Agreement.DOC
 - Exhibits to CA Energy Break-Out Agreements.DOC


Hey All-

Please read the following email and let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks,
April Hrach
Administrative Coordinator
Phone: 415-782-7825
Fax: 415-782-7851
----- Forwarded by April Hrach/SF/ECT on 07/19/2001 01:55 PM -----

	Wilma Bleshman/ENRON@enronXgate
	07/19/2001 12:41 PM

		 To: April Hrach/SF/ECT@ECT, Gary Bode/ENRON@enronxgate, Dalak
Malik/ENRON@enronxgate, Deborah Kelly/ENRON@enronxgate, Christina
Albers/ENRON@enronXgate, Jason Chumley/ENRON@enronXgate
		 cc: Cyndi Wulfson/ENRON@enronXgate
		 Subject: San Francisco's Outlook Migration

April,

My plans are to visit your office the week of July 30th.  We have 20 people
that need to be migrated. I would like to migrate 10 people on Monday and 10
people on Tuesday. Migrations are done at night, therefore, Tuesday and
Wednesday morning I will  configure everyone's Outlook.  The rest of the time
I'll be training everyone and setting everything up to best fit people's
needs.

A copy of the NA Email Retention / Policy is attached.

However, due to legal issues we are currently experiencing with the San
Francisco office, this will not go into affect yet. We will not purge
anyone's Lotus Notes mailboxes. Notes will be available to you for
referencing.

Only 30 days worth of information will be transferred from Notes to Outlook.
Once on Outlook, we will still hold off on purging.
Nevertheless, when the legal issues clear, we will reinforce our policy.

Thank you for your time,

Wilma Bleshman
Enron Networks
713-853-1562


Rick,

I shall ask my assistant  to schedule a meeting early next week.

Vince

Richard B Jones@EES
02/01/2001 10:23 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Here's a 4th try!!!

---------------------- Forwarded by Richard B Jones/HOU/EES on 02/01/2001
10:22 AM ---------------------------

Richard B Jones
01/31/2001 04:39 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Here's a third try!!!

Vince,
 While I was at HSB, I designed an insurance or reinsurance financial model
that HSB uses for new product development, pricing different reinsurance
strategies, computing stochastic earnings forecast, and estimating
probabilistic maintenance & repair costs. The code, written in Visual Basic &
MS Access belongs to HSB, and I want to replicate it here for our use at
Enron. I would like to arrange a time to specifically talk to you and perhaps
Vasant who was briefed on the model, about how we can use your group for the
analytical and programming support to get this model re-constructed.
 I have screen outputs from the code and Vasant thought the re-design and
construction here at Enron is a problem that your group can do. Could you let
me know when we can setup an hour to discuss?
Thanks,
Rick Jones


Steve -

Just wanted to let you know things are progressing nicely on the Houston
Video.  Mark Palmer's group have given me support on the video copy and Beth
Stier has stayed in contact with the video company to ensure quality for us.

I will set up some time to go over the mock up with you later this week.

Hope all is well with you.

Traci

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Tara Osborn  [mailto:tara@nion-is.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 6:11 PM
To: twarner@enron.com
Subject: Main menu mock

Traci,

Good morning. I have worked up a "mock" for the  main menu for the Houston
Project we are working on. This will come onto the  screen after the video,
you will us it to navigate to your custom page.

If you could please take a look at the mock at this
link:http://www.nionis.com/houston/index.htm

Please let me know your feedback.

Thank you,
Tara

Tara Osborn
Multimedia Developer
NION  Interactive Solutions
1301 Capital of Texas Highway Suite B-310
Austin,  Texas 78746
(512) 306-1442 ext. 106


call me when you get a chance.  they have the wrong ext. for you on voice
activation thing.


Start Date: 1/21/02; HourAhead hour: 20;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002012120.txt
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database


I scheduled this meeting in Houston to best accomodate schedules of some of
our Enron speakers -- the hill country or even Galveston was going to make it
impossible for Jeff Skilling to join us.  I would look at this meeting as if
it were to be held outside of town.  I have preliminarily reserved rooms for
all of you at the Wyndham Warwick.  Part of the reason for this forum is to
meet and get to know your counterparts in other Enron operating companies and
from around the world.  If you can stay at the hotel, this team building will
probably be enhanced.  This memo is not to force you to pack your bags and
stay at the hotel, but to let you know that my budget for the event did
include rooms for all of you for Sunday and Monday nights.  I hate the Sunday
thing, but in trying to minimize the time out of the office for those who
will travel from far away, this best suited their schedules.  Please let
Patti know on Thursday whether or not you would like a room at the hotel to
make it easier for you to fully participate.


FYI, Mike McConnell is confirmed.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Phillips, Cathy
Sent:	Wednesday, October 17, 2001 11:12 AM
To:	Armstrong, Julie
Subject:	RE: October 27th Huskers vs. Oklahoma

Hi Julie -

I believe that Mike talked to Dan and told him that he would like to be included in this trip.  Please let me know if I need to do anything more.

Thanks.

Cathy P.
X-36898

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Armstrong, Julie
Sent:	Tuesday, October 16, 2001 1:58 PM
To:	Phillips, Cathy
Subject:	FW: October 27th Huskers vs. Oklahoma

Cathy:

I am glad that I called you to check on this.  The following people are confirmed to attend.

Stan Horton
Danny McCarty
Bob Hayes
Terry MCGill/Columbia Gas
Clark Smith/El Paso
Dave Neubauer
Mary Kay Miller

Please call me at x33597 if you have any questions and to confirm Mike's attendance.  Thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Armstrong, Julie
Sent:	Monday, October 15, 2001 10:26 AM
To:	'tmcgill@nisource.com'
Cc:	'pmcleod@nisource.com'
Subject:	October 27th Huskers vs. Oklahoma

Please note that Husker gear (sweatshirts, wind jackets and hats) will be given out on the plane.

Thank you for agreeing to join Enron at the Huskers vs. Oklahoma game on Saturday, October 27th in Lincoln, Nebraska.

The game time has not been determined (Game time is at 11:00 a.m.) and a tentative flight schedule for the Houston attendees is as follows.

7:00 am departure from Houston and 4:00 pm departure from Lincoln.

The flight times may adjust when the game time is determined.

I will furnish information and directions to the Enron hanger closer to the game date.

If you have any questions, please call me at 713-853-3597.  Thank you.

Julie Armstrong
Enron
713-853-3597


Could you please give Delma Salazar a call tomorrow and come by and set up OA
Exposure and ROAR on her PC.  Please also add her to your update emails.  She
should have all the required O drive access.  Her number is 3-9883.  Thanks.
PL


SAVE  %30  to %40 on Health Insurance!
 GET a FREE ONLINE QUOTE!
24 Hours a Day! 7 Days a week! FREE INSURANCE Quotes!    Click here to get a free health insurance quote!
 __________________________________________
BEST RATES for Life Insurance in AMERICA!
 Highest quality Life Insurance companies with the best rates in America.
Spectrum Direct provides a comprehensive report for consumers.
Excellent information on "how to" buy life insurance.
Spectrum Direct is famous for making it fast and easy to buy term life insurance.Best Life Insurance Rates!
__________________________________________
SAVE up to  70% on TERM LIFE INSURANCE!
 PROTECT YOUR FAMILY with the LOWEST RATES!   INSTANTLY SAVE 70% on TERM LIFE INSURANCE!
__________________________________________
4.5 Cents per minute long distance. ANYTIME!
NO MONTHLY FEE! Save your money for things that matter!
This is the best long distance deal being offered!
Click the link below to register.Click for 4.5 CENTS
__________________________________________
FREE AUTO INSURANCE QUOTES! CHEAPEST AUTO INSURANCE!
SAVE 35% on Auto Insurance RATES!Click here for Auto Insurance Quotes!
__________________________________________


Vince -

I work in the Caribbean Structuring Group and previously worked at Entergy
Power Marketing on the Structuring desk with Gary Zhu.  I am attaching the
resume of a friend from Entergy who holds a PhD in Operations Research.  He
is considering a move from Entergy and from speaking with Li Xiao I thought
that your group might be a good fit for him.  Please call with any questions
(x 67446).


---------------------- Forwarded by Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT on 01/25/2000
10:48 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Maria Sandoval                           01/25/2000 09:22 AM

To: Andrea R Guillen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chantelle Villanueva/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth
Soto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pamela Sonnier/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cassandra S Dutton/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Melba Lozano/HOU/ECT@ECT, Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice
Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Irena D Hogan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lorraine Becker/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Fwd: Fwd: Do ya love me?

---------------------- Forwarded by Maria Sandoval/HOU/ECT on 01/25/2000
09:21 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Andrea R Guillen                           01/25/2000 09:11 AM

Sent by: Andrea R Guillen
To: Maria Sandoval/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cecilia Olvera/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa
Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth Soto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phenicia
Olivier/HOU/ECT@ECT, iguillen@aglife.com, lgarza@jcpenney.com, Chantelle
Villanueva/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Fwd: Fwd: Do ya love me?

---------------------- Forwarded by Andrea R Guillen/HOU/ECT on 01/25/2000
09:09 AM ---------------------------

Cecilia Olvera
01/25/2000 09:00 AM
To: Andrea R Guillen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Angela Henn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alex
Saldana/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hannah Ortiz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Heather Choate/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Lynn Tippery/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: A Olvera <mariachifrontera@yahoo.com> @ ENRON
Subject: Fwd: Fwd: Do ya love me?

I love you too Al !

Guys- don't freak out that's my brother.  : )

C
---------------------- Forwarded by Cecilia Olvera/HOU/ECT on 01/25/2000
08:57 AM ---------------------------

A Olvera <mariachifrontera@yahoo.com> on 01/25/2000 07:56:53 AM
To: Adriana Aguilar <vivgaytan@yahoo.com>, Diana Degollado
<dldegollado99@hotmail.com>, Susana Jones <susanacha@yahoo.com>, Josie
<thewayiam0@aol.com>, Albert Martinez <agmjr86736@aol.com>, Cecilia
Olvera/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hugo Perez <hcperez_99@yahoo.com>, Jaime Salas
<segio@aol.com>
cc:
Subject: Fwd: Fwd: Do ya love me?

Note: forwarded message attached.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com

X-Apparently-To: mariachifrontera@yahoo.com via web3201.mail.yahoo.com
X-Track2: 2
X-Track: 1: 40
Received: from nytoday.whowhere.com (HELO mc-qout2.whowhere.com)
(209.1.236.38)  by mta111.mail.yahoo.com with SMTP; 24 Jan 2000 20:09:13 -0000
Received: from Unknown/Local ([?.?.?.?]) by shared1-mail.whowhere.com; Mon
Jan 24 12:09:03 2000
To: mariachifrontera@yahoo.com
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2000 15:09:03 -0500
From: "Adriana Aguilar" <vivgaytan@eudoramail.com>
Message-ID: <EKFCPNCFHBDGAAAA@shared1-mail.whowhere.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Sent-Mail: off
X-Mailer: MailCity Service
Subject: Fwd: Fwd: Do ya love me?
X-Sender-Ip: 208.136.233.96
Organization: QUALCOMM Eudora Web-Mail  (http://www.eudoramail.com:80)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Language: en
Content-Length: 1768
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

--

--------- Forwarded Message ---------

DATE: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 00:03:00
From: Ashram11@aol.com
To: vivgaytan@eudoramail.com

 >>> > > >   HOPE YOU SEND THIS BACK!!
 >>> > > > The way to love anything is to realize that it
 >>> > > > might be lost!
 >>> > > >
 >>> > > >  Hello everyone, this is to show people you love
 >>> > > >  them and to see how many people love you!!!!!!
 >>> > > >
 >>> > > >   Don't feel embarrassed because only you will get
 >>> > > >  the results.
 >>> > > >
 >>> > > >  First send it to every friend that you have
 >>> > > >   on-line.
 >>> > > > If they send it back then they truly are your friend.
 >>> > > > If they delete it then they never were.
 >>> > > >
 >>> > > >   Good Luck
 >>> > > >
 >>> > > >
 >>> > > >   PS -- Also send this to whoever sent it to you
 >>> > > >   because obviously they love
 >>> > > >  you and you are their friend. If you love them
 >>> > > >  and are friends with
 >>> > > >  them....send it back to them.
 >>> > > >
 >>> > > >
 >>> > > >   IF THIS LETTER IS SENT BACK TO YOU:
 >>> > > >
 >>> > > >   0 TIMES =YOU NEED TO WORK ON YOUR "PEOPLE SKILLS"
 >>> > > >
 >>> > > >   2 TIMES =YOU ARE NICE BUT NEED TO BE MORE OUTGOING
 >>> > > >
 >>> > > >   4 TIMES =YOU ARE COOL
 >>> > > >
 >>> > > >  6 TIMES =YOU ARE ALMOST POPULAR
 >>> > > >
 >>> > > >   8 TIMES =YOU HAVE PICKED YOUR FRIENDS WELL AND ARE ON THE ROAD
 >>>TO
 >>> > > > "SUCCESS"
 >>> > > >
 >>> > > >   10 TIMES OR MORE =YOU ARE TOTALLY AWESOME
 >>> > > >
 >>> > > >   *NOTE: YOU CAN ONLY COUNT A LETTER SENT BY THE
 >>> > > >   SAME PERSON ONCE.
 >>> > > >
 >>> > > >
 >>> > > >

--------- End Forwarded Message ---------

Join 18 million Eudora users by signing up for a free Eudora Web-Mail account
at http://www.eudoramail.com


- famly7.jpg
 - famly3.jpg


Glen, as we discussed, here is the negotiated rate TW deal which TK did today
under Rate Schedule ITS-1.
The term is ONE DAY, Nov. 15.
Quantity:  30,000 Dth/day

I know this is a bit unusual.  We are just going to have to ask the FERC for
a waiver of their "before gas flows" filing requirement.
Given the price spreads and the shippers' willingness to pay more than max.
rates for short-term deals, we might have more deals like this.  We probably
need to put our heads together to come up with a better procedure for when
this happens.  It would be so much better if we were able to send tariff
sheets via e-mail to our D.C. office.

Call if you have questions or need anything.
---------------------- Forwarded by Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron on 11/14/2000
02:18 PM ---------------------------

	From:  TK Lohman                           11/14/2000 11:26 AM

To: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Negotiated Rate

Susan, I did a negotiated rate with PG&E Energy Trading for transport from
the EOT Area to WOT area at $0.09 for November 15, 2000.  Their contract # is
8265.

I don't know if it will flow yet.  TW is allocated for tomorrow.

TK


Gerald,

Attached are my thoughts on the Bridgeline / Texaco issues. We'll meet at 9 am 8-14-01 in EB 3583

gdw


I will be out of the office next week on vacation during July 5th through
July 10th.

   Bob Cotten  will handle my entire desk . Bob can be reach on extension
3-6101.


Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Start Date: 2/3/02; HourAhead hour: 1;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002020301.txt


Mark:

Here is a list of the 66 physical deals that were zeroed out from December 15 onwards  las night.
There were also many financial deals that were killed, but I hope that does not matter to Unify.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mcclure, Mark
Sent:	Thursday, December 13, 2001 5:11 PM
To:	Jaquet, Tammy; Krishnaswamy, Jayant
Cc:	Pena, Matt; Superty, Robert; Wynne, Rita; Pinion, Richard; Farmer, Daren J.; Heal, Kevin; Kinsey, Lisa; Lamadrid, Victor; Smith, George F.; Sullivan, Patti
Subject:	RE: Killing ENA to ENA deals in Sitara

Jay,

Let's not assume what impact this will have. Even though it is better to zero out deals we(VM) wouldn't want to go in and zero out 2000 deals.

We do have a few questions.

I would like to discuss what minimal impact is? How do you know what impact this will have? Is there a reason this will have little impact? Do all of these D2D deals have zero volume associated with them?
Who decided to do this?
Why are we doing this?
What time span are we talking (Production months/Year)
Let's determine the impact if any?

I would like to meet with you guys and get more detail on why we are doing this and determine the impact?

thanks,
m.m.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Jaquet, Tammy
Sent:	Thursday, December 13, 2001 4:29 PM
To:	Krishnaswamy, Jayant
Cc:	Pena, Matt; Superty, Robert; Mcclure, Mark; Wynne, Rita; Pinion, Richard; Farmer, Daren J.; Heal, Kevin; Kinsey, Lisa; Lamadrid, Victor; Smith, George F.; Sullivan, Patti
Subject:	RE: Killing ENA to ENA deals in Sitara
Importance:	High

Jay,

If a deal is killed it poses a problem for us in Unify if there are any paths associated with the deal; therefore, we request the deals be zeroed out.  Call me if this is a problem.  Also, we would appreciate further details on why these deals are being killed.

In addition, I have copied Rita and Mark from Volume Management for their input.

Regards,

Tammy
x35375

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Pena, Matt
Sent:	Thursday, December 13, 2001 3:39 PM
To:	Krishnaswamy, Jayant; Pinion, Richard; Jaquet, Tammy
Cc:	Severson, Russ; Truong, Dat; Aybar, Luis; Ma, Felicia
Subject:	RE: Killing ENA to ENA deals in Sitara

Thanks Jay!

Tammy/Richard:
You may want to let the schedulers know, although they may already.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Krishnaswamy, Jayant
Sent:	Thursday, December 13, 2001 3:38 PM
To:	Pinion, Richard; Jaquet, Tammy
Cc:	Severson, Russ; Pena, Matt; Truong, Dat; Aybar, Luis; Ma, Felicia
Subject:	Killing ENA to ENA deals in Sitara

Richars/Tammy:

We will be killing about 2000 deals in Sitara tonight. Whenever a deal is touched in Sitara, it will bridge over to Unify. THese are Desk2Desk deals, and should have minimal impact on you.


We will be continuing the Credit/Legal seminars on the following schedule.
Please add these dates to your calendars:

Session 3:  The Credit Support Annex and Paragraph 13
April 4 (Wednesday)
2:00 - 3:30 p.m.
EB49c3

Session 4:  The Credit Support Annex and Paragraph 13 (continued)
April 18 (Wednesday)
2:00 - 3:30 p.m.
EB49c3

Session 5:  The Credit Worksheet
May 2 (Wednesday)
2:00 - 3:30 p.m.
EB49c4

Session 6:  Letters of Credit, Guaranties and Equity Structures
May 16 (Wednesday)
2:00 - 3:30 p.m.
EB49c4

Session 7:  Higher Risk Counterparties, Early Termination, Master Netting
Issues and Canadian Issues
May 30 (Wednesday)
2:00 - 3:30 p.m.
EB49c4

A reminder e-mail will be sent a day or two before each session.