Thanks.

-----Original Message-----
From: Allen, Gary
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 7:04 AM
To: Hayslett, Rod
Subject: RE: TWP and NNG Stats

Frequency or incident rates are calculated as follows:

Lost Time = no. of incidents x 200,000/total no. man hours worked

Recordable= same as above.  There are individual recordable cases and ALL lost time incidents are counted as "one" lost time and "one" recordable.  In other words every LT adds one to LT and one to Recordables.

Vehicle Frequency= no. of accidents x 1,000,000/total miles driven.

More explanation at http://www.ets.enron.com/safety/statistics/default.asp .

Thanks
Gary Allen

-----Original Message-----
From: Hayslett, Rod
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 6:45 AM
To: Allen, Gary
Cc: Edwards, Ralph; Fields, Kerry
Subject: RE: TWP and NNG Stats

Can you give me a quick definition of the frequency rates (formula please)?

-----Original Message-----
From: Allen, Gary
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 4:10 PM
To: Hayslett, Rod
Cc: Edwards, Ralph; Fields, Kerry
Subject: TWP and NNG Stats

As per your request please see the attached document.

Thanks,
Gary Allen
Safety System & Reporting Advisor
713-646-7488
gallen@enron.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Lowry, Phil
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 6:32 AM
To: Edwards, Ralph
Cc: Hayslett, Rod
Subject: FW:

Ralph, please get with Rod and provide what ever he needs in the way of Safety Stats.

-----Original Message-----
From: ROD HAYSLETT [mailto:haysletr@txucom.net]
Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2001 9:07 PM
To: Lowry, Phil
Subject: FW:

Where can I get info on safety statistics for the pipes?

-----Original Message-----
From: 8778044255@skytel.com [mailto:8778044255@skytel.com]
Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2001 5:10 PM
To: haysletr@flash.net
Subject:

finalizing due diligence. do you have the ingaa/aga report you referenced in
our meetings?


okay by me


Attached is a revised Credit Watch listing as of 4/09/01.   Please note that
there are 12 counterparty additions/revisions to the Watchlist for this week.
If there are any personnel in your group that were not included in this
distribution, please insure that they receive a copy of this report.
To add additional people to this distribution, or if this report has been
sent to you in error, please contact Veronica Espinoza at x6-6002.
For other questions, please contact Bill Bradford at x3-3831, Russell Diamond
at x5-7095, or Brant Reves at x3-9897.


Thank you for shopping at the http://www.LongHornStore.com!
We really appreciate your business!

The following is confirmation that your
order has been received.
According to our records, your order is as follows:

Order #TX97551874153873 Please refer to this number when
making any inquiries about this order.

Shipping/Billing Information:
Gerald Nemec
(713) 853-3512
1403 Banks
Houston, TX, 77006
US

Items Ordered:

1;  2000 Longhorn Videos (Individual Games);  0041-2000txvideo;  ;  Nov 24 -
Texas A and M;  ;  39.99

S&H..............$7.75
Tax..............$
Total............$47.74

If any of the above information needs to be corrected, please email
 customerservice@totalsports.net as soon as possible.  Please refer to
your order number TX97551874153873 and explain what should be corrected.
For information regarding our 30 day Return Policy, please visit the
Policies section of our online store or contact  customer service
 by phone or email.

NOTE: The LongHorn Online Store uses a variety of different suppliers
when shipping orders. If you ordered
multiple items, your items may arrive at different times
in separate boxes.  Most orders will be delivered in one to two
weeks unless otherwise specified on the website. If you have a
question about the status of your order, please email
customerservice@totalsports.net.

Sincerely,
The Total Sports E-Commerce Group


Please plan to attend a staff meeting today at 2:00 PM.  The meeting will be held in ECS03980.  Thank you.

- Rhonna
(X30360)


Please disregard my first note. Chris Foster will call tonight and tell you
what to do with ARCO's schedule.

---------------------- Forwarded by Monika Causholli/PDX/ECT on 04/04/2001
04:54 PM ---------------------------

Monika Causholli
04/04/2001 01:26 PM
To: Portland Shift
cc:

Subject: Tuesday/Wed Buyback

---------------------- Forwarded by Monika Causholli/PDX/ECT on 04/04/2001
01:34 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Chris H Foster                           04/04/2001 10:43 AM

To: izarrai@bp.com
cc: Kourtney Nelson/PDX/ECT@ECT, Monika Causholli/PDX/ECT@ECT

Subject: Tuesday/Wed Buyback

Alicia:

For today you had pre-scheduled 29 MW for all hours and had a unit outage
that started around 8:00 (I think).  For HE 12 - 24 you purchased 25 MW from
us at $220.  For HE 13 - 24 you purchased 3 MW at $225.  Your schedule will
therefore reflect 29MW through HE 11, 4 MW for HE 12 and 1 MW for HE 13-24.
Deviation quantities and ISO purchases will be based on that schedule.

For Wed your  pre-schedule reflects 18 MW On Peak and 21 Off Peak.  Prices
for tomorrow were

Peak - $215
Off Peak - $110

We will work to buy this back as well.  We will not pre-schedule anything
tomorrow morning for Friday and Saturday unless you give us the go ahead.

Prices for tomorrow

C


Henry -

Attached is a draft of the proposed confidentiality agreement for work to be pursued with Enron Net Works.  I sincerely apologize for the delay in forwarding this document to SunGard for review.  It is possible that a few additional comments will need to be added once I have discussed the document further with key business personnel.

Please review the attached at your convenience and also forward, as necessary, to anyone else in your organization who is required to review and approve agreements of this nature.

Thanks for your patience.

Mark
Ph:  713-345-8897
Fax: 713-646-4842
E-mail:  mark.greenberg@enron.com


Got 'em.  Thanks a million.

	Karen Denne/ENRON@enronXgate
	07/31/2001 05:25 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: Letter to Senators

You poor thing!  Did you get the faxes I sent?  Hang in there and holler if
there's anything I can do to help. kd

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 4:59 PM
To: skean@enron.com; Denne, Karen; Shapiro, Richard; Mara, Susan; Kaufman,
Paul; Scott Govenar; hgovenar@govadv.com; Sanders, Robert
Subject: Letter to Senators

Bear with me.  I want to work on it through the evening.  Will make sure that
it's out tonite, well in advance of tomorrow's 1 PM PDT conference call.

Best,
Jeff


Is the question for online and offline products (to the extent that we gear
up for metals online)?

	Noel Petterson@ENRON
	07/31/2000 08:05 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Alcoa Master Agreement

Sara, Would you please take a look at the email below regarding Alcoa's
Master Agreement with Enron.  Thank you. - Noel
---------------------- Forwarded by Noel Petterson/Corp/Enron on 07/31/2000
08:00 AM ---------------------------
   Carol St Clair @ ECT                07/30/2000 09:22 AM

To: Noel Petterson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Alcoa Master Agreement

Noel:
I am on maternity leave.  Please contact Sara Shackleton about this.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com

	Noel Petterson@ENRON
	07/28/00 02:56 PM

		 To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Alcoa Master Agreement

Carol,

Tim Reyes of Alcoa would like to make sure that their current master
agreement with Enron will encompass trading metal products, specifically,
aluminum products on EOL.  I am hoping that you are the correct person to
answer his question.

If you require more information Please contact Mr. Reyes at 865-594-4734.

Thank you,

Noel


FYI only - the agriculture documents....

---------------------- Forwarded by Rahil Jafry/HOU/ECT on 01/26/2001 04:20 PM ---------------------------

Patrick Conner
01/26/2001 02:43 PM
To:	rahil.jafry@enron.com
cc:
Subject:	AG Presentation

---------------------- Forwarded by Patrick Conner/HOU/ECT on 01/26/2001 02:43 PM ---------------------------

Darren Maloney@ENRON
12/13/2000 08:24 PM
To:	Mark Wadlington/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:	Patrick Conner/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject:	AG Presentation

Here is McKinsey's work.  Broad overview only, with no specific analysis of
grains, meats or softs.  Priorities here are grains, then meats, and separately
softs given our existing exposure to this segment (53k Tons of Cocoa Physical,
Softs Brokerage Business in London).

Mark, I would encourage you to come down to 29 (assuming you are on 33) and
we will be more than happy to share all of our resources to get you up to speed
on our analysis and why we think these segments hold a lot of opportunity.

Regards,
Darren Maloney

<Embedded StdOleLink>


Jeremy,

The following curves will need modification:

GDP-NNG/TOK/PAN:
21st 			2.21
22nd thru 26th		2.21
27th			2.63

NNG/TOK/13:
21st thru 27th		2.325

GDP-IROQUOIS:
21st			2.81
22nd thru 26th		2.81
27th			3.21


Hi Maureen

I hope you're keeping well.  London Research has been asked to validate the
long-term copper (and other) forward curves being used by MG.  Clearly this
lies outside our domain of expertise (being economics), so I've referred Tani
to you.

Speak to you soon,
Steve


See Schedule 2 for slide.

Jan


Jeff,

Thank you so much for all the info and the map you provided.

I went to the website of both Socal and SDG&E to get the tariff.  However, I
don't really understand how they can be worked out into one.  If you can
provide insights on that, or get the tariff numbers to me, I will be very
much appreciated.  Above all, you are the expert!

Thanks again,

Ming

From: Jeff Dasovich on 05/22/2001 08:46 PM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: Mingcheng Lian/AP/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: RE: La Rosita Plant and North Baja Pipeline

To get from the California border down to Mexico, you would get service off
of SoCalGas' and SDG&E's tariff (i.e., you have to wheel through SoCalGas and
SDG&E to get there.  There may be a single tariff for that service, however
(rather than taking service off of two tariffs).  I'll try to get the tariff
numbers and get back to you.  All the tariffs are on Sempra's website.

Best,
Jeff


---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Moon/HOU/ECT on 03/28/2001 11:43 AM
---------------------------

	From:  David Oliver                           03/28/2001 11:13 AM

To: Jennifer Oliver/EU/Enron@Enron, "Chris Dahl" <cdahl@incyte.com>,
"Ben_Richter" <Ben_Richter@email.msn.com>, "jerry oliver"
<jnmoliver@yahoo.com>, Mark Friedman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Moon/HOU/ECT@ECT,
William Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jason Harding/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Cross/NA/Enron,
Guy Freshwater/LON/ECT@ECT, Michelle C Waldhauser/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: Foot and mouth crisis worsens

---------------------- Forwarded by David Oliver/LON/ECT on 28/03/2001 18:12
---------------------------

Pasi Hamalainen
28/03/2001 17:07
To: David Oliver/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: FW: Foot and mouth crisis worsens

---------------------- Forwarded by Pasi Hamalainen/LON/ECT on 28/03/2001
18:07 ---------------------------

	From:  Maarit Makinen                           28/03/2001 18:01

To: Pasi Hamalainen/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: FW: Foot and mouth crisis worsens

here is your first Albanian case
---------------------- Forwarded by Maarit Makinen/LON/ECT on 28/03/2001
18:01 ---------------------------

	Enron Europe

	From:  Sarah Knott                           28/03/2001 17:55

To: Maarit Makinen/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: FW: Foot and mouth crisis worsens

---------------------- Forwarded by Sarah Knott/LON/ECT on 28/03/2001 17:59
---------------------------

kmart@sintez.co.uk on 27/03/2001 15:27:23
To: mick.mart@rpgreaves.co.uk, eastlee@eclipse.co.uk, jk_bromley@hotmail.com,
Sarah.Knott@enron.com, DaveSpence999@aol.com, fathertimt@aol.com
cc:

Subject: FW: Foot and mouth crisis worsens

(See attached file: maul_und_klauenseuche.mpeg)

 - maul_und_klauenseuche.mpeg


Rod,
FYI - Here is Ted Robinson's (ENA) assessment of MTBE's situation for 2001.
Sounds a lot like 2000.  Our 2001 Plan is based on an average margin of $0.23
for MTBE.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kerry Roper/GPGFIN/Enron on 12/06/2000
03:06 PM ---------------------------

Michael Mitcham
12/06/2000 11:27 AM
To: James Prentice/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Kerry Roper/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: 2001 MTBE

Here is Ted's assessment. He does not mention Lubrizol value . I will call
Ted for an update on Lubrizol.
---------------------- Forwarded by Michael Mitcham/GPGFIN/Enron on
12/06/2000 11:09 AM ---------------------------

Ted Robinson@ECT
12/06/2000 10:23 AM
To: Michael Mitcham/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: 2001 MTBE

Per our discussion, I have talked with Adam on butanes for Q2/Q3 of 2001 and
put a guess at next years MTBE.  Adam feels the strip for butane would run
around 58 cpg or so.  Nat gas is on fire right now and looking at the screen
is around 5.25 for that timeframe, which would put methanol around 60cpg.
Elliott says that even with the run up on gas, methanol has yet to respond.
Maybe it moves up if MTBE turns around and we see some demand come in, but
for now it has stalled.

During Q2/Q3 2000, MTBE was extremely volatile, ranging from 8cpg  to 65cpg
over merc gasoline ( with an average of 33cpg).  Several factors contributed
to this swing, including strong demand in Europe and the US due to  tighter
gasoline specs in both regions.  These specs remain and to that extend, many
of the factors that contributed to last summer's run up will be in place in
2001.   As we close in on 2003, US demand should decrease as refiners,
especially on the West Coast, gear toward a phaseout of the product.  MTBE
usage will remain in place in 2001 however as all contract users (refiners)
are out for bids on product for the full year and Europe goes through a
second round of tightening gasoline specifications.

 Gasoline is currently around 77cpg for the Q2/Q3 strip.  I don't think that
20-25 cpg as an average over gasoline is an unreasonable assumption on which
to  base future Q2/Q3  economics.  With butane at 58cpg  and methanol at
60cpg, this would yield an MTBE price of 97cpg and a margin over feed cost of
19-24cpg.  Q1 and Q4 will more than likely be somewhat lower, but provide
ample margins in Feb/Mar as well as Sep/Oct .

Hopefully this helps.  If you have any further questions, give me a call.

Ted


Start Date: 4/24/01; HourAhead hour: 22;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Generation schedule.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042422.txt

---- Generation Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE.
     Details: (Hour: 22 / Preferred:   0.00 / Final:   0.00)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EES
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/24/01
  UNIT_ID: BADLND_7_PL1X2

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 22 / Preferred:   7.65 / Final:   7.19)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: SCE1
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/24/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


At Enron, we recognize that we are all stakeholders when it comes to the success of our communities. Whether we give back to communities with our time, talents or treasures is not the issue; rather, it is simply that we give.

Making Connections - We've Gone Paperless!
Community Relations has been working hard to help make giving and volunteering easier for Enron employees. Today, we are proud to launch an updated Community Relations web-site including paperless matching gift and volunteer incentive programs! Visit the site at cr.enron.com <http://cr.enron.com>.

The new CR site includes:
?	Matching Gift Program Information
?	Volunteer Incentive Program Information
?	Regularly Updated Volunteer Sign-up Information
?	Enron In Action
?	Corporate Giving
?	Education Programs

Win A $1000 Donation To Your Favorite Charity
If you donate to an eligible non-profit Tuesday July 17 through Tuesday, July 31 and use the on-line Matching Gift site located at cr.enron.com, your name will automatically be entered into a drawing for a chance for Enron to donate $1000 to the charity of your choice! Five employee's names will be drawn and winners will be notified by Friday, August 3.  Donations must be made to organizations that are eligible to be matched by the Enron Matching Gift Program.

For more information, please contact Community Relations at community-relations@enron.com <mailto:community-relations@enron.com>.

See you at the site!


Today's Washington Post contains a favorable comment on negawatts attributed
to House Energy & Commerce Committee Chairman Tauzin, following efforts we
made yesterday with the Chairman and his staff, both directly and via our
consultants.  The Post article reads, "In the coming months, Tauzin said,
Congress will take steps to allow consumers to sell power back to their local
energy grids."  We, of course, will continue to push for a version of this
concept that keeps this process open to multiple buyers and sellers, not just
the local utility.  The article dovetails with information directly from
Chairman Tauzin and Chairman Barton that they will continue to push our
demand buydown proposal, although we are working with them to shore up
support on the committee in the face of opposition from the usual suspects.


I would like to attend.  God knows if Harry can/will come.  We'll see.  I did 12 (slow) miles last weekend...
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Patti Young" <pyoung@cliverunnells.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Wednesday, October 31, 2001 1:31 PM
To:	Jones, Tana
Subject:	Party

Hey, Miss Tana,

Do you think you will make the party on Nov. 10 at Monnie's?????  Bring your
beau, too...

Let me know.

Patti


Morris:
Thanks.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com

	Morris Richard Clark/ENRON@enronXgate
	05/30/2001 02:33 PM

		 To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Julia Murray/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: RE: Steel Master Form

Carol,

Sorry for just getting back to you but I have been out of the office for the
last couple of days.  I will review the steel master this evening and turn
around any comments by EOB tomorrow. Thanks.

MRC

 -----Original Message-----
From:  St Clair, Carol
Sent: Friday, May  25, 2001 3:08 PM
To: Clark, Morris
Cc: Murray, Julia
Subject: Steel Master Form

Morris:
Could you please review and sign off on the tax language?  Thanks.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 05/25/2001 03:07 PM -----

	Carol St Clair 05/25/2001 02:52 PM 	   To: Julia Murray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry M
Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT  cc: Dan Lyons/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lou Stoler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peter
del Vecchio/HOU/ECT@ECT, Deb Korkmas/HOU/ECT@ECT  Subject: Steel Master Form

Julia and harry,
Enclosed is a revised draft of the Steel Master Agreement for your review.
Could you please forward this to Cheryl?  Thanks.

 << File: STEEL WORKING DRAFT NO.4 5-25 RED.DOC >>  << File: Steel Working
Draft No.4 5-25.doc >>

Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com


here is our update.  i think we should have this adequately documented by
Monday night.

  ----- Forwarded by Linda Robertson/NA/Enron on 04/15/2001 10:43 PM -----

	Sarah Novosel
	04/13/2001 06:05 PM

		 To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: BENEFITS OF OPEN ACCESS - EXPANSION OF SUPPLY

Linda:

Attached are some examples of ways in which open access will help increase
supply.  It's a work in progress, but here are my initial thoughts.

Also, Jim and I spoke with Tabors and Pickle and got clarification on the
numbers we used in making the point that supply will increase with open
access.   They said that the 2-5 percent works in the east (AEP) but they
would like to be more conservative in the west (1-3 percent increase in
supply).  This still results in an increase of supply on any given day of
1,350 - 4,050 of MW.  I made this change to the "Examples" page but we'll
need to make a similar change to the Lay paper.

Call me this weekend if you need me (202) 466-9160.

Sarah

	James D Steffes
	04/13/2001 05:43 PM

		 To: Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: BENEFITS OF OPEN ACCESS - EXPANSION OF SUPPLY

HERE ARE SOME OTHER THOUGHTS TO MAYBE WORK IN OVER THE COMING DEBATES --

There are real supply benefits from open access.

First, reliability is increased.   Historically, utilities shared reserves
only with adjoining systems.  Open access allows sharing of reserves,
especially replacement reserves, over a broader market.

Second, open access increases the productivity of the current generation
portfolio.  Barriers to moving power to where it is needed allows less costly
generation to sit idle.  In addition, open access reduces the generation
capacity requirements of the overall system.  Instead of local utilities
building for their needs, open access allows remote generation to reliably
serve local needs.  The result is that lower capacity is required as more
energy is served out of the same quantity of capacity, resulting in long-term
efficiency.

Third, open access should improve the utilization of the current transmission
network.  In the natural gas context, pipeline open access has allowed for
transported volumes nearly quadrupling since 1985.


Susan:  I agreed with Kim Farr at First Union to send our resolution (with
certificate).  When you have a chance, would you please handle.  Thanks.

(p.s. - First Union will be an important equity trading partner for Enron
Corp. and we'll be dealing with the same lawyers, etc.)

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


Can we change this contract to reflect this proposal. (leave fixed price
blank)

And use this format?


Bill,

This looks good.

Thanks, Kim.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rapp, Bill
Sent:	Friday, January 18, 2002 11:19 AM
To:	Harris, Steven; Watson, Kimberly; Lindberg, Lorraine; Lokay, Michelle; Kilmer III, Robert; Lokey, Teb; Hass, Glen
Cc:	Porter, J. Gregory
Subject:	Motion to Intervene in PG&E FERC Proceeding

Attached for your review and comments is a draft of a motion by TW to intervene in the PG&E FERC proceeding.

 << File: PG&E.doc >>


We did a cogen deal in Nevada.  Try asking Karen Jones in Portland.  Mark


(See attached file: Answers to PUCT January 5 questions2 through5
Jan19question3.doc)
---------------------- Forwarded by Jerry Ward/Texas Utilities on 01/16/2001
03:37 PM ---------------------------

"Jerry Ward" <gward1@txu.com> on 01/16/2001 03:21:46 PM

To:   Operations@ercot.com
cc:    (bcc: Jerry Ward/Texas Utilities)
Subject:  Examples in Response to PUCT Staff Questions Regarding Docket No.
      23220

OWG Members,

The following set of responses to the request of the Commission Staff for
examples of the operation and clearing of ancillary services markets have
incorporated the comments that we received from ERCOT and members of the OWG.
A
new question from the Staff concerning load has been answered by Reliant. It
is
my understanding that these responses will be conveyed to the PUCT by Mark
Walker on the 17th. If you have any comments please call me or Mark.

Jerry Ward
Cell 214-926-8637
Office 214-875-9254

 - Answers to PUCT January 5 questions2 through5 Jan19question3.doc


Michelle,

In reviewing the latest gas sale to WGR effective April 1, I found that the referenced downstream contract (CR 27608) that WGR would be using is not valid for April activity.  Dennis Lee confirmed that the contract is considered a Red Rock expansion request that may start in June.  Do you want me to contact WGR and have them change the contract that we hand-off to?  WGR has  contract 24042 set up for another gas sale effective April 1.  Let me know how you would like me to proceed.

Thanks,  Bert

-----Original Message-----
From: Lokay, Michelle
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 11:12 AM
To: Strohmeyer, Vincent; Moseley, Debbie; Moore, Jan; Hanagriff,
Richard; Mulligan, Amy; Schoolcraft, Darrell
Cc: Harris, Steven; Watson, Kimberly; Hernandez, Bert; Cherry, Paul
Subject: Western Gas Sales Confirmation


No concerns. We managed to get about $40mm reduction the IT development budget, you are picking up some of the reduced budget (See Lloyd Will's email of earlier today).  Let Lloyd know if you have any problems as we are getting fairly close to sign off.

Thanks

Louise

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Milnthorp, Rob
Sent:	Friday, September 28, 2001 5:23 PM
To:	Kitchen, Louise
Subject:	FW: 2002 Plan Summary for Commercial Support

As promised. I'm comfortable with the attached. Let me know if you have any questions or concerns. thanks, rob

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hanslip, David
Sent:	Friday, September 28, 2001 4:21 PM
To:	Milnthorp, Rob
Cc:	Cappelletto, Nella
Subject:	2002 Plan Summary for Commercial Support

Here is the revised budget spreadsheet.


just to give you shit about your boys losing in OT

anything new with vegas ??

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Kevin" <klyn@pdq.net>@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, November 06, 2001 12:37 PM
To:	Quigley, Dutch
Subject:	Re: seeing as mark won't answer my e-mails....

What did you call for Sunday?

----- Original Message -----
From: <Dutch.Quigley@enron.com>
To: <klyn@pdq.net>
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 12:24 PM
Subject: RE: seeing as mark won't answer my e-mails....

> oh , we might go to the UT game one Sat. so I am not sure if i could play
> or not on Sunday
>
>     -----Original Message-----
>    From:   "Kevin" <klyn@pdq.net>@ENRON
>    Sent:   Tuesday, November 06, 2001 12:17 PM
>    To:     Quigley, Dutch
>    Subject:  Re: seeing as mark won't answer my e-mails....
>
>    golfing...
>
>    ----- Original Message -----
>    From: <Dutch.Quigley@enron.com>
>    To: <klyn@pdq.net>
>    Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 11:54 AM
>    Subject: RE: seeing as mark won't answer my e-mails....
>
>
>    > what is on sunday ?
>    >
>    >     -----Original Message-----
>    >    From:   "Kevin" <klyn@pdq.net>@ENRON
>    >    Sent:   Tuesday, November 06, 2001 11:48 AM
>    >    To:     Joe Ramirez; siva66@mail.ev1.net; bwdunlavy@yahoo.com;
>    Quigley,
>    >              Dutch; martier@cpchem.com; wolphguy@aol.com;
>    >              MarkM@cajunusa.com; ras1119@hotmail.com
>    >    Subject:  Re: seeing as mark won't answer my e-mails....
>    >
>    >    I thought we were all going somewhere on Sunday??? Mark???
>    >
>    >    ----- Original Message -----
>    >    From: "Joe Ramirez" <jramirez@othon.com>
>    >    To: <siva66@mail.ev1.net>; <bwdunlavy@yahoo.com>;
>    >    <Dutch.Quigley@enron.com>;
>    >    <martier@cpchem.com>; <wolphguy@aol.com>; <MarkM@cajunusa.com>;
>    >    <ras1119@hotmail.com>; <klyn@pdq.net>
>    >    Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 11:09 AM
>    >    Subject: RE: seeing as mark won't answer my e-mails....
>    >
>    >
>    >    > I am in. What day? What time? Where? Can we get out there early?
>    >    >
>    >    > -----Original Message-----
>    >    > From: siva66 [mailto:siva66@mail.ev1.net]
>    >    > Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 10:57 AM
>    >    > To: bwdunlavy@yahoo.com; Dutch.Quigley@enron.com;
>    martier@cpchem.com;
>    >    > wolphguy@aol.com; jramirez@othon.com; MarkM@cajunusa.com;
>    >    > ras1119@hotmail.com; klyn@pdq.net
>    >    > Subject: seeing as mark won't answer my e-mails....
>    >    >
>    >    > is anyone up for some golf this weekend?
>    >    >
>    >    > ricardo
>    >    >
>    >    > ________________________________________________________________
>    >    > Sent via the EV1 webmail system at mail.ev1.net
>    >    >
>    >    >
>    >    >
>    >    >
>    >    >
>    >
>    >
>    >
>    >
>    >
**********************************************************************
>    > This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant
>    affiliate
>    and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use
of
>    the
>    intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
>    others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient
(or
>    authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
>    reply
>    to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
>    all
>    copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
>    intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or
evidence
>    a
>    binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
>    affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not
>    be
>    relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or
otherwise.
>    Thank you.
>    >
**********************************************************************
>
>


---------------------- Forwarded by Kayne Coulter/HOU/ECT on 12/06/2000 10:15
AM ---------------------------

	From:  Mitch Robinson @ ENRON                           12/06/2000 09:57 AM

To: Kayne Coulter/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Weekly Monitoring Report

---------------------- Forwarded by Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron on 12/06/2000
09:57 AM ---------------------------

George Hopley@ECT
12/06/2000 09:56 AM
To: Paul J Broderick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peter Makkai/NA/Enron@Enron, Eric
Saibi/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Juan Padron/NA/Enron@Enron, Clint
Dean/Corp/Enron@Enron, Grace Kim/NA/Enron@Enron, Doug
Gilbert-Smith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joe Quenet/NA/Enron@Enron, Chris
Dorland/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey Miller/NA/Enron@Enron, Robert
Benson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mike Carson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Laura
Podurgiel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Larry Valderrama/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matt Lorenz/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Larry Jester/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robert Stalford/NA/Enron@Enron, Tom
May/Corp/Enron@Enron, Gautam Gupta/HOU/ECT@ECT, Narsimha
Misra/NA/Enron@Enron, Lloyd Will/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rika Imai/NA/Enron@Enron, Mitch
Robinson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Ricardo Perez/NA/Enron@Enron, Christopher
Watts/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Weekly Monitoring Report

---------------------- Forwarded by George Hopley/HOU/ECT on 12/06/2000 09:52
AM ---------------------------

HGP Inc <hgpbus@home.com> on 12/06/2000 09:19:57 AM
To: Kevin.M.Presto@enron.com, George.Hopley@enron.com,
Mark.Dana.Davis@enron.com, FSturm@enron.com, Rogers.Herndon@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Weekly Monitoring Report

Attached are the two files providing the Weekly Monitoring Report.  One
file includes the summary page and the other file has the detail for
each unit monitored.

The monitoring report for the eight Western units has been sent to Tim
Belden.

If you have any questions, please call.

Dan
 - East Summary 001206.doc
 - East001206.doc


Marybeth:
The call's ended and I'll be available for the 2:30 call.

Best,
Jeff


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 04/26/2000 03:39
PM ---------------------------

Joan Veselack@ENRON
04/26/2000 03:27 PM
To: dkinney@columbiaenergygroup.com, jporte1@columbiaenergygroup.com, Chris
Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Choice and Storage - April 2000 - Updated!!!

This is updated for actuals through April 25th. Use "Choice Flow" Tab.

Thanks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Attached is a legal memo regarding Westinghouse's delivery obligations with
respect to the 501D5A gas turbine generator package.  I will forward you an
additional copy by fax.

TFAH

 - 1199308.01


Sitara #119378 is for all three N17872 legs and EY4000.2 is sitara #115203.
THe remaining liquidation EY4008.2 should be a liq no flow.  The deal was
killed.
PL

Doug Nelson@ENRON
02/05/2001 07:06 PM
To: Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: TAGG Numbers?

Phillip,

Would you please identify the SITARA numbers for the following TAGG numbers?

 #N17872.3
 #N17872.5
 #N17872.7

 #EY4000.2
 #EY4000.8

Deal Capture did not help.

Thanks,
Doug - Settlements
3-0560


Hi Mark,
I checked the production graphs for the SCADA ATP at trent, and I can see
couple of turbines missing, turbine no. 73 & 98, I understand that I
downloaded the data from the wrong turbine for 98 but I don't know what is
wrong with turbine 73. I checked the data in the minana.db and statdat.db
files, for turbine 73 couple of times and I believe that all the data is
there, I am attaching these files again so you can check them once more.
As for turbine 98, I apologize for the silly mistake of downloading the files
from the wrong turbine, please find attached the files which I downloaded
this morning, all the 144 records for the 10-min average still exist in the
minana.db file.
Regards,
Alaadin


Greetings, everyone!

This e-mail is to let you know that several documents for tomorrow's RRG meeting are now available on the RTO West Website.  You can find them at:

<http://www.rtowest.org/Stage2RRG_Upcoming.htm>

They include a copy of the TransConnect slide presentation for tomorrow, a "white paper" on planning and expansion prepared by PNGC, an updated congestion model summary paper, and a brief description of the Filing Utilities' proposal to modify certain aspects of the Stage 1 pricing model.

Thank you very much!

- Sarah Dennison-Leonard
  RTO West Coordinating Team


Although I haven't heard from Dave I'm trying to change my flights to March 8 - 11.


Shirley,

Please, arrange a phone interview. Zimin, Stinson, and myself.
He may be a good candidate for Tanya.

Vince

Stinson Gibner
07/20/2000 11:16 AM
To: Pinnamaneni Krishnarao/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Please find home for Brainful Candidate

Any interest?

---------------------- Forwarded by Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT on 07/20/2000
11:15 AM ---------------------------

Stephanie Miller@ENRON
07/20/2000 10:49 AM
To: Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Williamson/GCO/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Please find home for Brainful Candidate

Attached for your review is a resume a friend of mine came across. Thought
you might want to review.

Regards,

Stephanie
---------------------- Forwarded by Stephanie Miller/Corp/Enron on 07/20/2000
11:40 AM ---------------------------

Debbie Chance
07/20/2000 09:42 AM
To: Stephanie Miller/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Please find home for Brainful Candidate

Stephanie,

Came by way of friend of a friend - looks very good on paper.  He has
identified an interest in the following jobs that were posted in the net.
You know everyone here - could you identifiy the appropriate people to call
attention to this candidate?
Resume attached below.

Thanks,
DC

1. ECONOMIC ADVISOR

CONTACT:  Respond to Enron Corp, Human Resources 235, P. O. Box 3330, Omaha,
NE
68103-0330 or e-mail: dea.crum@enron.com as a .doc or .txt attachment. Please
include this requisition number: 104776
|----------------+-----------------------------------|
|                |                                   |
| Job ID         | 0000104776                        |
|                |                                   |
|----------------+-----------------------------------|
|                |                                   |
| Department     | SYSTEMS OPTIMIZATION TEAM         |
|                |                                   |
|----------------+-----------------------------------|
|                |                                   |
| Company        | GAS PIPELINE GROUP                |
|                | GAS PIPELINE GROUP                |
|                |                                   |
|----------------+-----------------------------------|

2. MANAGER

CONTACT: PLEASE DO NOT CONTACT THE HIRING MANAGER. NO FAXES PLEASE. Send
resumes
via e-mail to tony.vasut@enron.com or mail to Enron, attn: TVasut - EB3628,
1400
Smith St., Houston , TX 77002. Please refer to job # 104486
(Embedded image moved to file: pic04224.pcx)
|----------------+------------------------------------|
|                |                                    |
| Job ID         | 0000104486                         |
|                |                                    |
|----------------+------------------------------------|
|                |                                    |
| Department     | TRADE CREDIT                       |
|                |                                    |
|----------------+------------------------------------|
|                |                                    |
| Company        | CORPORATE STAFF                    |
|                | RISK ASSESSMENT AND CONTROL        |
|                |                                    |
|----------------+------------------------------------|

3. MANAGER

CONTACT: To submit resume for consideration, please e-mail it to
bholcomb@enron.com if possible. Plain text in the message or an attached
word.doc are acceptable. Please use no columns, italics or underlines. If
unable
to Email, bholcomb@enron.com, fax it to (713) 646-2169, attn: EB1013a or mail
it
to B.Holcomb, EB1013a, P.O.Box 1188 , Houston, Tx. 77251-1188
|------------------+----------------------------------|
|                  |                                  |
| Job ID           | 0000104778                       |
|                  |                                  |
|------------------+----------------------------------|
|                  |                                  |
| Department       | ASSET OPERATIONS & SVCS          |
|                  |                                  |
|------------------+----------------------------------|
|                  |                                  |
| Company          | WHOLESALE, RETAIL & COMM         |
|                  | ENRON ENERGY SERVICES            |
|                  |                                  |
|------------------+----------------------------------|

4. GAS TRADING SUPPORT GENERALIST

CONTACT: PLEASE EMAIL RESUME TO mark.broadfoot@enron.com or if email is
unavailable, respond to MARK BROADFOOT EB3617a. Reference JOB ID#0000104730 in
email subject. RESUMES NOT ACCEPTED FROM AGENTS. GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY HOT JOB
(Embedded image moved to file: pic19645.pcx)
|----------------+-----------------------------------|
|                |                                   |
| Job ID         | 0000104730                        |
|                |                                   |
|----------------+-----------------------------------|
|                |                                   |
| Department     | INFRASTRUCTURE & INTEGRAT         |
|                |                                   |
|----------------+-----------------------------------|
|                |                                   |
| Company        | GLOBAL FUNCTIONS                  |
|                | TECHNOLOGY                        |
|                |                                   |
|----------------+-----------------------------------|

5. RISK MANAGEMENT ANALYST

CONTACT: To be considered for this position, please e-mail your RESUME as a
.doc
or .txt ATTACHMENT with your SALARY HISTORY to ENAJOBS4 @enron.com. (Please
eliminates italics, underlining, multiple margins or side-by-side columns.)
Please indicate on the email SUBJECT LINE your NAME AND THE JOB ID#. Resumes
with salary history will receive priority review.
|-----------------+-----------------------------------|
|                 |                                   |
| Job ID          | 0000104631                        |
|                 |                                   |
|-----------------+-----------------------------------|
|                 |                                   |
| Department      | GLOBAL FACILITIES                 |
|                 |                                   |
|-----------------+-----------------------------------|
|                 |                                   |
| Company         | WHOLESALE, RETAIL & COMM          |
|                 | NORTH AMERICA                     |
|                 |                                   |
|-----------------+-----------------------------------|


I'll send 2 invites up.  What's your location?

Gregory Carraway@ENRON
07/10/2000 02:36 PM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re:

Thank you for the invitation. I would love to attend. I would like to invite
my wife, if that would be ok. Also, could you tell me where the Mercantile
bar is located? Thank you!!!


=================================================
EREN NETWORK NEWS -- January 23, 2002
A weekly newsletter from the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE)
Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Network (EREN).
<http://www.eren.doe.gov/>
=================================================

Featuring:
*News and Events
          California Cut Electricity Use by 6.7 Percent in 2001
          Spire Solar Chicago Installs 100 Kilowatts of Solar Power
          DOT Proposes No Change in Light Truck Efficiency Standards
          Real-World Test of Superconductor Cable Delayed
          Report Questions Government Support for Renewable Energy

*Energy Facts and Tips
          Report Claims Utilities are Struggling to Power Data Centers

*About this Newsletter

----------------------------------------------------------------------
NEWS AND EVENTS
----------------------------------------------------------------------
California Cut Electricity Use by 6.7 Percent in 2001

The final numbers for California's electricity use in 2001 are in,
and they're impressive: compared to 2000, the state reduced
its total electricity use by 6.7 percent and its peak electricity
demand by 8.9 percent, or nearly 3,800 megawatts. Those
numbers are adjusted for economic growth and differences in
weather, but the cold, raw numbers still show a 4.4 percent
drop in electricity use and a 5.4 percent drop in peak demand.
Governor Gray Davis lauded Californians for their achievement.
See the statistics, with a link to a January 17th press release
from Governor Davis, at:
<http://www.energy.ca.gov/electricity/peak_demand_reduction.html>.

The Pacific Northwest can be proud, too, according to DOE's
Bonneville Power Administration (BPA): the region reduced its
electricity demand by roughly 85 megawatts, or enough to
power more than 80,000 homes, in 2001. See the BPA press
release at: <http://www.bpa.gov/Corporate/KCC/nr/02nr/nr011702.shtml>.

Spire Solar Chicago Installs 100 Kilowatts of Solar Power

Spire Solar Chicago, a business unit of Spire Corporation,
announced last week the installation of a total of 100 kilowatts
of solar photovoltaic systems on six roofs in Chicago. The
systems were installed on the DuSable Museum of African
American History, the Homan Square Community Center,
Commonwealth Edison's South Hydome facility, two Chicago
public schools, and a small commercial building. The
installations are part of a local public/private partnership to
produce clean energy in Chicago. See the Spire press release
at: <http://www.spirecorp.com/Spire/news/PV369.html>.

DOT Proposes No Change in Light Truck Efficiency Standards

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
NHTSA), a part of the U.S. Department of Transportation
(DOT), released last week its proposed fuel efficiency
standards for Model Year 2004 light trucks. The proposed
standard holds the Corporate Average Fuel Efficiency
(CAFE) standard for light trucks at its current level of
20.7 miles per gallon. The light truck classification includes
vans, pickup trucks, and most sport utility vehicles (SUVs).

Since 1996, Congress has prohibited NHTSA from spending
any funds to consider changes to the CAFE standards.
Although that prohibition was lifted in December, the NHTSA
claims it has not had sufficient time to consider changes to
the standard. The NHTSA must issue its proposed rules
early enough to allow public comment and changes prior to a
final rulemaking, which must be issued by April 1st. The
public is invited to provide comments on the proposed fuel
efficiency standard before mid-February. See the January 18th
press release on the NHTSA Web site at:
<http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/nhtsa/announce/press/index.cfm>.

On January 14th, four days before the proposed standards
were released, the National Research Council (NRC) sent
NHTSA a report confirming the NRC's conclusions on CAFE
standards, originally released in a detailed report published
in July 2001. The reassessment was performed after the
initial report was challenged by the automotive industry. The
latest report reaffirms that "technologies exist that, if applied
to passenger cars and light-duty trucks, would significantly
reduce fuel consumption within 15 years," and that
"assessment of currently offered product technologies
suggest that light-duty trucks, including SUVs, pickups, and
minivans, offer the greatest potential to reduce fuel
consumption..." See the new report on the National
Academy Press Web site at:
<http://books.nap.edu/books/NI000377/html/R1.html>.

According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA), the overall fuel economy of light vehicles -- including
both light trucks and cars -- is now at a 21-year low of
20.4 miles per gallon. Although car mileage has remained
essentially flat for the past 16 years and light truck mileage
has stayed largely unchanged for the past 20 years, the
growing market share of light trucks has dragged down the
overall fuel economy of light vehicles. See the EPA "Light
Duty Automotive Technology and Fuel Economy Trends"
Web page at: <http://www.epa.gov/otaq/fetrends.htm>.

Note that actual fuel economies can be lower than the CAFE
standards for a number of reasons, including the fact that
manufacturers earn credits for any alternative-fuel vehicles
that they sell. Some manufacturers also fall below the
standards and pay penalties. To see how the details of how
manufacturers are meeting the standards, see the NHTSA
report on Model Year 2000 CAFE standards at:
<http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/cars/problems/studies/fuelecon/index.html>.

Real-World Test of Superconductor Cable Delayed

A test of a high-temperature superconductor (HTS) cable at
a Detroit Edison substation has been delayed indefinitely.
According to American Superconductor Corporation, which
made the HTS wires for the cables, a problem with the
vacuum insulating system used to help keep the cables cool
is preventing Detroit Edison from placing the HTS cables into
service. The company says the HTS wires met all their
performance requirements, and the vacuum insulating
technology is a proven technology that would not be
expected to hinder the future use of HTS cables. Pirelli
Energy Cables and Systems, the cable manufacturer, is
expected to issue a revised timetable for the demonstration
project in spring.

The Detroit Edison substation is the site of the first
installation and demonstration of an underground HTS cable
in a U.S. utility network. The utility installed three 400-foot
cables inside 4-inch-diameter underground ducts during the
summer of 2001. All other cable components, including the
cryogenic cooling and vacuum insulating systems, were
completed in the fall.

American Superconductor does have some good news,
though: its 5,000-horsepower HTS motor prototype, which
uses HTS wires in its rotor winding (the part of the motor that
rotates), was successfully tested at full load early this month.
The motor also successfully carried a peak load of 7,000
horsepower while running at its rated speed. Both the HTS
rotor coils and the refrigeration system met or exceeded their
performance goals, and the system as a whole operated at
an efficiency of 97.2 percent. The company claims it also
identified potential changes to the stator (the part of the
motor that stays still, or static) that could boost the efficiency
of the motor to 97.7 percent. See the American Superconductor
press releases at: <http://www.amsuper.com/press.htm>.

Report Questions Government Support for Renewable Energy

A report issued early this month by the Cato Institute, a
non-profit public policy research foundation, says that
government subsidies for renewable energy sources are
unwarranted. The report says that renewable energy is not
likely to gain significant market share in the foreseeable
future without a significant increase in government subsidies
or mandates. The report also claims that the environmental
benefits of renewable energy could be achieved more
cheaply using other technologies.

The report does acknowledge that government subsidies for
fully commercialized fossil energy technologies -- oil, coal,
and natural gas -- are nearly double those for renewable
energy, while nuclear and fossil fuels are also receiving
more research and development funds. It also suggests that
natural gas prices and availability will remain stable for the
foreseeable future. See the Cato Institute press release, with
a link to the full report, at:
<http://www.cato.org/new/01-02/01-08-02r-2.html>.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENERGY FACTS AND TIPS
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Report Claims Utilities are Struggling to Power Data Centers

A report issued last week suggests that electric utilities are
having a difficult time providing power to electronic data
centers, including so-called "Internet hotels" that provide
servers for Web sites. The Platts report finds that such data
centers can consume from 8 to 50 times the electricity per
square foot used by standard commercial buildings. For
instance, a 344,000-square-foot data center under
construction in Washington State is expected to draw up to
105 megawatts of power when it is complete. Such high
power loads are causing some data centers to develop their
own power sources. See the news release from Platts, one
of The McGraw-Hill Companies, at:
<http://www.platts.com/pressreleases/pressrelease2002-0118.shtml>.

The Platts report might be somewhat suspect, however, in
light of a report issued last summer by DOE's Lawrence
Berkeley Laboratory (LBL). That report found that, for a
variety of reasons, data centers often greatly exaggerate
their power needs. It concluded that data centers use at
most 50 watts per square foot, and usually closer to 40 watts
per square foot. This number applies only to the computer
room part of the facility, and not surrounding office areas.
Using these figures, the data center in Washington would
need at most 17.2 megawatts of power -- probably much
less. See the August 29th edition of EREN Network News at:
<http://www.eren.doe.gov/newsletter/archives/2001/aug29_01.html>.

A report released last month by the Renewable Energy
Policy Project (REPP) suggests that energy use in data
centers could be even lower. Using efficient servers,
properly sized and efficient cooling systems, and other
energy efficiency approaches, data centers could reduce
their electricity demand by 20 to 50 percent, according to the
report. See the REPP announcement, with a link to the full
report, at:
<http://www.crest.org/articles/static/1/1008083982_982708646.html>.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
ABOUT THIS NEWSLETTER
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can subscribe to this newsletter using the online form at:
<http://www.eren.doe.gov/newsletter/subscribe/>.
This Web page also allows you to update your email address
or unsubscribe to this newsletter.

The Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Network (EREN)
home page is located at <http://www.eren.doe.gov/>.

If you have questions or comments about this
newsletter, please contact the editor, Kevin Eber, at
kevin_eber@nrel.gov.


----- Forwarded by Mark Whitt/NA/Enron on 08/27/2001 09:17 AM -----

	Tyrell Harrison 08/24/2001 09:26 AM 	   To: Mark Whitt/NA/Enron@Enron  cc:   Subject: Huber San Juan Proposal

Tyrell Harrison
303 575 6478


OK. I'll forward you the agreement with her comments. My only concern is that
I want to make sure we don't miss any points that could affect the
financeability / market value. We previously had some folks at A&K look at
IA's when we were doing the peakers. It might be worth asking Stuart if any
major points came up as a result of this...

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Mann, Kay
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 7:48 AM
To: Krause, Greg
Cc: Jacoby, Ben; Nicolay, Christi
Subject: RE: Midway Interconnect Agreement

Ben,

If Christi has reviewed an interconnect agreement, I ususally don't have
outside counsel review it unless there is a specific reason. She's the queen
of interconnects.

I suppose that after I review it, next stop is Finance/Accounting.

Carlos has given me a couple of comments.

Kay

From: Greg Krause/ENRON@enronXgate on 06/05/2001 11:35 PM
To: Ben Jacoby/ENRON@enronXgate, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: RE: Midway Interconnect Agreement

Please see attachment below with Christi's comments.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jacoby, Ben
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 12:22 PM
To: Mann, Kay
Cc: Krause, Greg; Nicolay, Christi
Subject: Midway Interconnect Agreement

Kay:

Greg has Christi's comments on the FPL Construction & Connection Agreement,
and he will be sending us those comments today in a marked document. Have we
engaged outside counsel to review this agreement? I'd like to have a
commercial / legal review fully completed, and then get accounting / finance
to comment. I this something you were planning to have Carlos to work on
given his recent work on ComEd and Ameren?

Please let me know. Thanks.

Attached is the original generic form of FPL Connection and Construction
Agreement for your reference.

Ben

 << File: FPL Construction  Connection Agreement Generic.doc >>


continental.com Specials for Patrice Thurston
Wednesday, October 17, 2001
****************************************

BOOK YOUR NEXT STAY AT ORBITZ.COM

You know Orbitz has the most low fares - but did you know you can find great deals on hotels there, too? Search by "stars," by brand, by address. Pick your amenities and get the results you really want. Check it out at:
http://continentalairlines.rsc01.net/servlet/cc?JHDUTBEitptlFLgkhgDJhtE0EU

UP-TO-DATE INFORMATION ABOUT YOUR CONTINENTAL TRAVEL PLANS

For all the information you need to know before you travel, visit our Customer Advisories at:
http://continentalairlines.rsc01.net/servlet/cc?JHDUTBEitptlFLgkhgDJhtE0EV

****************************************
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. This Week's Destinations
2. Westin Hotels & Resorts, Sheraton Hotels & Resorts, Four Points by Sheraton, St. Regis, The Luxury Collection and W Hotels
3. Hilton Hotel Offers
4. Alamo Rent A Car Offers
5. National Car Rental Offers

****************************************
1. THIS WEEK'S DESTINATIONS

Depart Saturday, October 20 and return on either Monday, October 22 or Tuesday, October 23, 2001. Please see the Terms and Conditions listed at the end of this e-mail.

Purchase continental.com Specials online until 11:59pm (CST) Friday at
http://continentalairlines.rsc01.net/servlet/cc?JHDUTBEitptlFLgkhgDJhtE0EW
You can also purchase continental.com Specials for an additional cost of $20 per ticket through our telephone service at 1-800-642-1617.

****************************************
TRAVEL MAY ORIGINATE IN EITHER CITY
****************************************
****Roundtrip BETWEEN CLEVELAND, OH and:

$129 - Milwaukee, WI

****Roundtrip BETWEEN HOUSTON, TX and:

$109 - Alexandria, LA
$129 - El Paso, TX
$119 - Midland/Odessa, TX
$149 - New York (LaGuardia only)
$129 - Pensacola, FL

****Roundtrip BETWEEN NEW YORK/NEWARK and:

$149 - Greenville/Spartanburg, SC
$129 - Norfolk, VA
$109 - Providence, RI

****************************************
2. CONTINENTAL.COM SPECIALS LAST-MINUTE WEEKEND RATES FROM WESTIN HOTELS & RESORTS, SHERATON HOTELS & RESORTS, FOUR POINTS BY SHERATON, ST. REGIS, THE LUXURY COLLECTION, AND W HOTELS

Visit our site for booking these and other Last-Minute Weekend Rates for this weekend October 19 - October 23, 2001.
http://continentalairlines.rsc01.net/servlet/cc?JHDUTBEitptlFLgkhgDJhtE0EX

--------------------------------------
Connecticut - Stamford - The Westin Stamford - $84.00
Connecticut - Stamford - Sheraton Stamford Hotel - $77.00

Massachusetts - Boston - Sheraton Boston Hotel - $159.00
Massachusetts - Needham - Sheraton Needham Hotel - $113.00

New Jersey - East Rutherford - Sheraton Meadowlands Hotel and Conference Center - $99.00
New Jersey - Elizabeth - Four Points by Sheraton Newark Airport - $77.00
New Jersey - Iselin - Sheraton at Woodbridge Place Hotel - $71.00
New Jersey - Parsippany - Sheraton Parsippany Hotel - $70.00
New Jersey - Piscataway - Four Points by Sheraton Somerset/Piscataway - $65.00
New Jersey - Weehawken - Sheraton Suites on the Hudson - $109.00

New York - New York City - Sheraton Russell Hotel - $179.00
New York - New York City - Sheraton New York Hotel and Towers - $169.00
New York - New York City - Essex House - A Westin Hotel - $228.00

Ohio - Cuyahoga Falls - Sheraton Suites Akron/Cuyahoga Falls - $99.00
Ohio - Independence - Four Points by Sheraton Cleveland South - $65.00

Rhode Island - Providence - The Westin Providence - $136.00
Rhode Island - Warwick - Sheraton Providence Airport Hotel - $89.00

Texas - Houston - Sheraton Houston Brookhollow Hotel - $45.00
Texas - Houston - The Westin Galleria Houston - $64.00
Texas - Houston - The Westin Oaks - $70.00
Texas - Houston - Sheraton Suites Houston Near The Galleria - $71.00

Wisconsin - Brookfield - Sheraton Milwaukee Brookfield Hotel - $49.00

For complete details on these offers, please refer to the terms and conditions below.

****************************************
3. CONTINENTAL.COM SPECIALS FROM HILTON HOTELS AND RESORTS

The following rates are available October 20 - October 22, 2001 and are priced per night.
--------------------------------------
Cleveland, OH - Hilton Cleveland East/Beachwood, Beachwood, OH. - $109

Houston, TX - Hilton Houston Westchase and Towers - $149
Houston, TX - Hilton Houston Hobby Airport - $109
Houston, TX - Hilton Houston Southwest - $99
Houston, TX - Doubletree Guest Suites Houston - $179

Midland, TX - Hilton Midland and Towers - $79

New York, NY & Newark, NJ - Doubletree Club Norwalk, Norwalk, CT. - $119
New York, NY & Newark, NJ - Hilton Hasbrouck Heights, Hasbrouck Heights, NJ. - $149
New York, NY & Newark, NJ - The Waldorf Astoria, New York, NY. - $219
New York, NY & Newark, NJ - The Waldorf Towers(TM), New York, NY. - $339
New York, NY & Newark, NJ - Hilton New York, New York, NY. - $179
New York, NY & Newark, NJ - Doubletree Club Suites Jersey City, Jersey City, NJ. - $129

To book this week's special rates for Hilton Family Hotels, visit and book at
http://continentalairlines.rsc01.net/servlet/cc?JHDUTBEitptlFLgkhgDJhtE0EY
Special rates apply only for the dates listed at each hotel and are subject to availability. Check hilton.com for specific dates at each Hilton Family Hotel. Or call at 1-800-774-1500 and ask for Value Rates. Restrictions apply to these rates.

********************************
4. CONTINENTAL.COM SPECIALS FROM ALAMO RENT A CAR

Rates listed below are valid on compact class vehicles at airport locations only. Other car types may be available. Rates are valid for rentals on Saturday, October 20 with returns Monday, October 22 or Tuesday, October 23, 2001.
-------------------------------
$26 a day in:  Newark, NJ (EWR)
$18 a day in:  Houston, TX (IAH)
$26 a day in:  Providence, RI (PVD)
$26 a day in:  Cleveland, OH (CLE)
$26 a day in:  Pensacola, FL (PNS)
$18 a day in:  Milwaukee, WI (MKE)

To receive special continental.com Specials discounted rates, simply make advance reservations and be sure to request ID # 596871 and Rate Code 33. Book your reservation online at:
http://continentalairlines.rsc01.net/servlet/cc?JHDUTBEitptlFLgkhgDJhtE0EZ
or contact Alamo at 1-800 GO ALAMO.

*If you are traveling to a city or a different date that is not listed, Alamo offers great rates when you book online at:
http://continentalairlines.rsc01.net/servlet/cc?JHDUTBEitptlFLgkhgDJhtE0EA
For complete details on these offers, please refer to Alamo's terms and conditions below.

****************************************
5. CONTINENTAL.COM SPECIALS FROM NATIONAL CAR RENTAL

Rates listed below are valid on intermediate class vehicles at airport locations only. Other car types may be available. Rates are valid for rentals on Saturday, October 20 with returns Monday, October 22 or Tuesday, October 23, 2001.
------------------------------------------
$28 a day in:  Alexandria, LA (AEX)
$29 a day in:  Newark, NJ (EWR)
$21 a day in:  Houston, TX (IAH)
$23 a day in:  Midland/Odessa, TX (MAF)
$21 a day in:  Norfolk, VA (ORF)
$29 a day in:  Cleveland, OH (CLE)
$19 a day in:  El Paso, TX (ELP)
$29 a day in:  Pensacola, FL (PNS)
$24 a day in:  Milwaukee, WI (MKE)
$23 a day in:  Greenville/Spartanburg, SC (GSP)
$47 a day in:  New York, NY (LGA)

To receive your continental.com Specials discounted rates, simply make your reservations in advance and be sure to request Product Code COOLUS. To make your reservation, contact National at 1-800-CAR-RENT (1-800-227-7368), or book your reservation online at
http://continentalairlines.rsc01.net/servlet/cc?JHDUTBEitptlFLgkhgDJhtE0EB
Please enter COOLUS in the Product Rate Code field, and 5037126 in the Contract ID field to ensure you get these rates on these dates.

* If you are traveling to a city or a different date that is not listed, National offers great rates when you book online at:
http://continentalairlines.rsc01.net/servlet/cc?JHDUTBEitptlFLgkhgDJhtE0EC
For complete details on these offers, please refer to National's terms and conditions below.

****************************************
CONTINENTAL.COM SPECIALS RULES:
Fares include a $37.20 fuel surcharge.  Passenger Facility Charges, up to $18 depending on routing, are not included. Up to $2.75 per segment federal excise tax, as applicable, is not included.  Applicable International and or Canadian taxes and fees up to $108, varying by destination, are not included and may vary slightly depending on currency exchange rate at the time of purchase. For a complete listing of rules please visit:
http://continentalairlines.rsc01.net/servlet/cc?JHDUTBEitptlFLgkhgDJhtE0EUT

ALAMO RENT A CAR'S TERMS AND CONDITIONS:
Taxes (including VLF taxes up to US$1.89 per day in California and GST), other governmentally-authorized or imposed surcharges, license recoupment fees, fuel, additional driver fee, drop charges and optional items (such as CDW Waiver Savers(R) up to US$18.99 a day,) are extra. Renter must meet standard age, driver and credit requirements. Rates higher for drivers under age 25. Concession recoupment fees may add up to 14% to the rental rate at some on-airport locations. Up to 10.75% may be added to the rental rate if you rent at an off-airport location and exit on our shuttle bus. Weekly rates require a 5-day minimum rental or daily rates apply. For weekend rates, the vehicle must be picked up after 9 a.m. on Thursday and returned before midnight on Monday or higher daily rates apply. 24-hour advance reservation required. May not be combined with other discounts. Availability is limited. All vehicles must be returned to the country of origin. Offer not valid in San Jose, CA.

NATIONAL CAR RENTAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS:
Customer must provide Contract ID# at the time of reservation to be eligible for discounts. Offer valid at participating National locations in the US and Canada. Minimum rental age is 25. This offer is not valid with any other special discount or promotion. Standard rental qualifications apply. Subject to availability and blackout dates. Advance reservations required. Geographic driving restrictions may apply.

TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR WESTIN, SHERATON, FOUR POINTS,
ST. REGIS, THE LUXURY COLLECTION, AND W HOTELS:
Offer is subject to availability. Advance Reservations required and is based on single/double occupancy. Offer not applicable to group travel. Additional Service charge and tax may apply. The discount is reflected in the rate quoted. Offer valid at participating hotel only. Offer valid for stays on Fri - Mon with a Friday or Saturday night arrival required. Rate available for this coming weekend only. Offer available only by making reservations via the internet. A limited number of rooms may be available at these rates.

---------------------------------------
This e-mail message and its contents are copyrighted and are proprietary products of Continental Airlines, Inc. Any unauthorized use, reproduction, or transfer of the message or its content, in any medium, is strictly prohibited.

****************************************
UNFORTUNATELY MAIL SENT TO THIS ADDRESS CANNOT BE ANSWERED.
If you need assistance please visit:
http://continentalairlines.rsc01.net/servlet/cc?JHDUTBEitptlFLgkhgDJhtE0EUV

This e-mail was sent to: pmims@enron.com

View our privacy policy at:
http://continentalairlines.rsc01.net/servlet/cc?JHDUTBEitptlFLgkhgDJhtE0EUU

TO UNSUBSCRIBE:
We hope you will find continental.com Specials a valuable source of information. However, if you prefer not to take advantage of this opportunity, please let us know by visiting the continental.com Specials page on our web site at:
http://continentalairlines.rsc01.net/servlet/cc?JHDUTBEitptlFLgkhgDJhtE0EUX

TO SUBSCRIBE:
Please visit the continental.com Specials page on our web site at:
http://continentalairlines.rsc01.net/servlet/cc?JHDUTBEitptlFLgkhgDJhtE0EUW


I extended 454057 for the month of December.

D

Aimee Lannou   01/09/2001 12:43 PM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Edward Terry/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Dec 00

Daren - meter 5192 flowed 8 dth on 12/19, 33 dth on 12/20 and 2 dth on
12/29.  The last deal for this meter was 454057 in Nov 00.  Could you please
extend this deal for these 3 days or create a new one?  Please let me know.

AL


Senate asked to hold Reliant in contempt over document release
Associated Press Newswires, 07/18/01
Calif. Senate Panel Votes To Cite Reliant With Contempt
Dow Jones Energy Service, 07/18/01

USA: UPDATE 1-Sempra looks to natgas lines to carry optic fiber.
Reuters English News Service, 07/18/01

US GAO Demands Cheney Provide Data On Energy Meetings
Dow Jones International News, 07/18/01
Investigative arm of Congress issues demand letter for energy meetings
Associated Press Newswires, 07/18/01
Enron's Azurix blocks construction of Argentina-Uruguay gas pipeline - report
AFX News, 07/18/01
Fitch Rts Marlin Water Trust II Sr Secured Notes Due 2003, `BBB'
Business Wire, 07/18/01

Senate asked to hold Reliant in contempt over document release
By DON THOMPSON
Associated Press Writer

07/18/2001
Associated Press Newswires
Copyright 2001. The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.

SACRAMENTO (AP) - A Senate committee investigating possible price gouging in
California's energy market voted unanimously Wednesday to ask the full Senate
to find Houston-based Reliant Energy in contempt for failing to comply with a
subpoena for documents.
The decision came despite Reliant's last-ditch offer to turn over 10,000
documents under a contingent confidentiality agreement that the Senate Select
Committee to Investigate Market Manipulation rejected.
"I'm not just trying to buy time," said Reliant attorney Charles J. Stevens.
"We believe we have acted cooperatively. We believe we have a good-faith
legal dispute."
"It's clear you're trying to work with us. It's not contempt with contempt,"
agreed committee Chair Joseph Dunn, D-Santa Ana.
By contrast, Sen. Steve Peace, D-Chula Vista, blasted Reliant's "shoddy
behavior" before backing what he termed "a legally unprecedented step."
If the full Senate imposes sanctions against Reliant, it will be the first
time since 1929, when the Senate voted to jail reluctant witnesses during a
committee investigation of price fixing and price gouging allegations
involving cement sales to the state.
There are no set penalties, said committee special counsel Laurence Drivon.
By law, "the Senate can take such action as it deems necessary and
appropriate."
The contempt citation will be presented to the Senate Thursday, but will
immediately be sent to the Rules Committee for another hearing before the
full Senate acts, Dunn said.
He said the committee had no choice but to seek the sanctions and likely
force a court battle after it was unable to reach agreement with Reliant over
the confidentiality of its documents. The committee voted 6-0 in favor of the
contempt finding.
"If we reach agreement on these issues, the process would be terminated
immediately," Dunn said.
In that light, the committee stepped back from its contempt vote last week
against Enron Corp. after the company and committee moved closer to agreement
over its release of thousands of documents stored in Texas.
Enron sued the committee last week to stop the subpoena of its financial and
electricity trading records. Among its objections are that only the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission has the authority to investigate wholesale
markets.
Reliant, like Enron, had argued the company's financial papers are outside
the committee's jurisdiction because most of its operations and paperwork are
outside California.
Atlanta-based Mirant Inc. also at least temporarily avoided a contempt
citation by agreeing to turn over subpoenaed documents. The committee will
review both companies' compliance in 30 days.

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Calif. Senate Panel Votes To Cite Reliant With Contempt

07/18/2001
Dow Jones Energy Service
(Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)

LOS ANGELES -(Dow Jones)- A California Senate committee Wednesday voted to
cite Reliant Energy (REI) with contempt because the company has refused to
provide documents for an investigation into wholesale electricity prices in
the state, said committee Chairman Joe Dunn, D-Santa Ana.
The committee also voted to forward a contempt charge for Enron Corp (ENE) to
the full Senate, where it will be voted on. If the charge is approved, the
Senate will vote on punishment, which could include hefty fines or
incarceration of executives.
Talks between Enron and committee attorneys Monday seemed to indicate the
company would agree to committee demands, but since then it has become clear
the company doesn't plan to comply, Dunn said.
"If you had asked two days ago I'd have said we are cautiously optimistic
about Enron. Now I'm pessimistic about it. We felt they were indicating to us
a willingness to do what the other generators were willing to do, but the
bottom line is that they are not, despite their cooperative-sounding words.
We are no closer to them coming into compliance than we were a week ago,"
Dunn said.

The Senate Select Committee to Investigate Market Manipulation is requesting
that Reliant and Enron provide 16 kinds of documents related to market
behavior, rent a depository for the documents, and sign the committee's
version of a confidentiality agreement. Both generators have refused to meet
those demands, Dunn said.
The committee will drop its contempt charges at any time before a full Senate
vote if either generator agrees to its requests.
A report detailing Enron's contempt charge will be sent to the full Senate on
Thursday for introduction, but is expected to be referred to the Senate Rules
Committee for review before a floor vote.
Dunn said he didn't know how long the report would be considered in the Rules
Committee, but he will "certainly push them to do it as soon as possible."
Enron spokesman Mark Palmer said the company "will continue to negotiate"
with the committee.
Legislators are scheduled to begin a monthlong break Friday, but aren't
certain that will happen because they still need to pass a budget bill and
are trying to approve a bill to rescue Edison International (EIX) unit
Southern California Edison before leaving.
Dunn said it would take a few days to prepare a report on Reliant's contempt
charge.
"We may not be able to forward that report to the Senate floor until the day
we get back from recess," Dunn said.
No one at Reliant could be immediately reached for comment.
The committee originally was poised to cite seven other electricity
generators for contempt, but all eventually agreed to provide the requested
information.
-By Jessica Berthold, Dow Jones Newswires; 310-962-2843;
jessica.berthold@dowjones.com

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

USA: UPDATE 1-Sempra looks to natgas lines to carry optic fiber.

07/18/2001
Reuters English News Service
(C) Reuters Limited 2001.

SAN DIEGO, July 18 (Reuters) - A Sempra Energy unit said on Wednesday it has
developed technology to connect thousands of miles of underused high-speed
fiber-optic cable to buildings across the U.S. by inserting the cable
directly into existing natural gas pipelines.
Sempra said using its utility's gas lines - which hook up to buildings in
cities throughout central and southern California - could tackle the
telecommunications industry's "last mile" problem connecting end users to
outlying fiber-optic cable networks without tearing up city streets.
The surge in demand for high-speed Internet access has led telecommunications
companies to pour billions of dollars into vast nationwide fiber-optic
systems that carry data to computers, phones and screens faster than
traditional copper wires.
"Demand for broadband service in metropolitan areas is greater than ever,"
said Donald Felsinger, group president of Sempra Energy.
"The most significant obstacle to meeting that demand is the laying of
fiber-optic cable under city streets - traditionally a slow, costly and
disruptive process," he said.
Sempra Communications' new technology encases fiber-optic cable in a
protective polyethylene conduit before inserting it through the same
pipelines that carry gas to utility customers, saving time and leaving
neighborhood streets intact.
Sempra said companies that use the technology could see savings up to 30
percent on last mile costs compared to traditional methods of using older
technologies and digging up streets, said Jennifer Andrews, a spokeswoman at
Sempra Fiber Links, a new unit set up to market the technology.
Andrews said the company had already met with 15 gas utilities and five
telecommunications companies interested in the technology.
She said Sempra's Southern California Gas Co (SCG) had already applied to the
California Public Utilities Commission for approval to use the fiber-optic
technology in its lines.
SCG is one of the largest gas distribution companies in the United States,
serving around 18 million customers in Central and Southern California.
In a statement, Sempra Communications said installing the cable does not
inhibit a gas utility from performing any duties necessary to protect public
safety.
Andrews said Sempra filed around two months ago for patents on its
fiber-optic technology with the U.S. Patent Office and Trademark Office and
the European Commission, the executive arm of the European Union.
Energy companies that have ventured into the fiber-optic business by building
infrastructure and/or through bandwidth trade, include Williams Cos., El Paso
Corp.., Enron Corp. ENE.N, Dynegy Inc., Duke Energy, Consolidated Edison Inc.
and Montana Power Co.
In March 2000, Montana Power announced plans to divest its energy business
and invest the proceeds into its broadband and telecommunications unit Touch
America.

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

US GAO Demands Cheney Provide Data On Energy Meetings

07/18/2001
Dow Jones International News
(Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)

WASHINGTON (AP)--The investigative arm of Congress demanded Wednesday that
Vice President Dick Cheney identify all the industry leaders who helped
formulate the Bush administration's energy policy. Refusal could lead to a
court fight.
The White House, which is reviewing the request, said it would work with the
General Accounting Office to resolve the issue.
The GAO letter follows repeated refusals by the vice president's office to
provide names and titles of participants who met with the energy task force
chaired by Cheney.
Under the law, the GAO could sue if the Bush administration fails to supply
the data within 20 days.
This is the first demand letter ever issued by the GAO to a vice president,
said Democratic Reps. John Dingell and Henry Waxman, who directed the agency
to review the task force's work nearly three months ago.
The vice president's lawyer has told the GAO there were nine meetings of the
task force and that staffers also met with many people to gather information.
The result was an energy policy, announced May 17, that is aimed at
increasing the nation's supply of energy. It includes expanded oil and gas
drilling on public land and a rejuvenated nuclear power system.
White House spokeswoman Anne Womack said the letter is under review and "we
will continue to work with the GAO to resolve this issue."
The vice president's office "has continued on its course of secrecy and
obstinance," Dingell said in a statement.
"The White House should simply try telling the truth...and stop hiding
information that Congress and the public have a right to see," said Waxman.
The White House's position is that the GAO is entitled to information on the
task force's costs, but that the congressional watchdog agency doesn't have
authority to ask for lists of those with whom the task force met.
Waxman is also pressing for a Justice Department investigation of Karl Rove
over the Bush political strategist's energy-related meetings.
The White House has acknowledged that Rove participated in meetings on the
administration's energy policy while he owned stock in energy companies such
as Texas-based Enron Corp. The White House has supplied no details on Rove's
meetings.

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Investigative arm of Congress issues demand letter for energy meetings
By PETE YOST
Associated Press Writer

07/18/2001
Associated Press Newswires
Copyright 2001. The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.

WASHINGTON (AP) - The investigative arm of Congress demanded Wednesday that
Vice President Dick Cheney identify all the industry leaders who helped
formulate the Bush administration's energy policy. Refusal could lead to a
court fight.
The White House, which is reviewing the request, said it would work with the
General Accounting Office to resolve the issue.
The GAO letter follows repeated refusals by the vice president's office to
provide names and titles of participants who met with the energy task force
chaired by Cheney.
Under the law, the GAO could sue if the Bush administration fails to supply
the data within 20 days.
This is the first demand letter ever issued by the GAO to the vice president
of the United States, said Democratic Reps. John Dingell of Michigan and
Henry Waxman of California, who directed the agency to review the task
force's work nearly three months ago.
The vice president's lawyer has told the GAO there were nine meetings of the
task force and that staffers also met with many people to gather information.
The result was an energy policy, announced May 17, that is aimed at
increasing the nation's supply of energy. It includes expanded oil and gas
drilling on public land and a rejuvenated nuclear power system.
White House spokeswoman Anne Womack said the letter is under review and "we
will continue to work with the GAO to resolve this issue."
The vice president's office "has continued on its course of secrecy and
obstinance," Dingell said in a statement.
"The White House should simply try telling the truth ... and stop hiding
information that Congress and the public have a right to see," said Waxman.
The White House's position is that the GAO is entitled to information on the
task force's costs, but that the congressional watchdog agency doesn't have
authority to ask for lists of those with whom the task force met.
Waxman is also pressing for a Justice Department investigation of Karl Rove
over the Bush political strategist's energy-related meetings.
The White House has acknowledged that Rove participated in meetings on the
administration's energy policy while he owned stock in energy companies such
as Texas-based Enron Corp. The White House has supplied no details on Rove's
meetings.
---
On the Net:
GAO: http://www.gao.gov

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Enron's Azurix blocks construction of Argentina-Uruguay gas pipeline - report

07/18/2001
AFX News
(c) 2001 by AFP-Extel News Ltd

LA PLATA, Argentina (AFX) - Enron Corp water and sewage unit Azurix Buenos
Aires SA has obtained a restraining order against the construction of the
Cruz del Sur pipeline under the River Plate from Argentina to Uruguay, the
daily El Dia reported.
Works were paralyzed BG Group PLC, BP Amoco PLC and Bridas Corp joint venture
Pan American Energy LLC, BASF AG's Wintershall and Enron Corp and Perez
Companc SA's Transportadora Gas del Sur venture Gasoducto Cruz del Sur SA
from Punta Lara in Argentina to Colonia, Uruguay, it said.
"Dredging operations carried out in the coastal area (near the Punta Lara
potabilization plant), could have caused an alteration in the continuity and
quality of water service," said Buenos Aires provincial enviromental policy
department.
Gasoducto Cruz del Sur has not met the conditions required to complete the
pipeline, and this "could place the potability of water at risk," court
sources told El Dia.
Azurix holds the Buenos Aires provincial water and sewage concession.
lac/gc For more information and to contact AFX: www.afxnews.com and
www.afxpress.com

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Fitch Rts Marlin Water Trust II Sr Secured Notes Due 2003, `BBB'

07/18/2001
Business Wire
(Copyright (c) 2001, Business Wire)

NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--July 18, 2001--Fitch has assigned a 'BBB' rating
to Marlin Water Trust II and the Marlin Water Trust II Co-Issuer's (Marlin
II) $475 million issuance of 6.31% senior secured notes due 2003, and $515
million 6.19% senior secured notes due 2003.
The notes are issued domestically pursuant to SEC Rule 144A and outside the
U.S. under Regulation S. At closing net proceeds from the issuance will
temporarily be invested in two short-term Enron Corp. (Enron) notes.
Ultimately the proceeds from the repayment of the Enron notes will be used to
redeem the outstanding $830 million 7.09% senior secured notes due 2001 of
Marlin Water Trust (Marlin) and pay interest on the senior notes and yield on
the Marlin trust certificates. The support for the rating comes from an
overfund account (pre-funded interest) and equity commitment from Enron in
the form of mandatorily convertible preferred stock. The overfund account
will be invested in Enron debt securities (rated 'BBB+', Rating Outlook
Stable), with payments used to service interest to noteholders.
Fitch considers the cash flow stream to repay interest representative of a
'BBB+' credit profile. Payment of principal ultimately relies on Enron's
obligation to remarket mandatorily convertible preferred securities. Fitch
currently rates Enron's preferred securities 'BBB-'.
Enron established Marlin to facilitate off-balance sheet financing of the
acquisition of Wessex Water Plc (Wessex). Azurix, an indirect wholly owned
subsidiary of Enron, acquired Wessex in October 1998 for $2.4 billion through
its direct subsidiary Azurix Europe Limited (AEL). Through a series of
transactions, Enron contributed its ownership interest in Azurix to Atlantic
Water Trust (AWT) in exchange for a 50% ownership interest in AWT. At the
same time, Marlin acquired a 50% ownership interest in AWT with proceeds from
the original Marlin issuance of senior notes ($1.15 billion) and trust
certificates ($125 million). AWT applied the Marlin notes and certificates
proceeds to repay a $900 million acquisition bridge loan and to establish a
$249 million overfund account invested in Enron senior unsecured debt to pay
note interest and certificate yield. In addition, Enron contributed to AWT
its rights under a $125 million loan to AEL (rated `BBB+').
Both the AEL note and the Enron debt securities are held at Bristol Water
Trust (Bristol) for the benefit of Marlin investors. In June 1999, Azurix
completed an initial public offering of 33% of the company, proceeds of which
were used to partially redeem the Marlin senior notes. In a shift in strategy
in March 2001, Enron repurchased the Azurix shares held by the public. The
Marlin II transaction represents a refinancing of the remaining Marlin senior
notes. While various sources of repayment for the Marlin II notes are
available, such as sale or liquidation of the AWT assets, an equity offering,
or repayment of the AEL note, primary credit support is derived from the
Enron obligation to remarket mandatorily convertible preferred stock.
If an amount sufficient to repay the notes has not been deposited with the
trustee 120 days prior to the maturity date or upon a Note Trigger Event, the
indenture trustee will direct the share trust to sell the Enron preferred
stock on terms that are designed to generate an amount sufficient to redeem
the notes in full.
In the event that the issuance of the preferred stock yields less than the
amount required to redeem the senior notes, Enron is required to deliver
additional shares. If Enron cannot or does not deliver on this obligation,
then the amount of the deficiency becomes a payment obligation of Enron,
representing a general unsecured claim. Trigger events include: an event of
default on the Marlin II notes occurs and notes are accelerated; 120 days
prior to maturity if the repayment amount of the senior notes has not been
deposited with the indenture trustee as a result of the sale of Enron equity
or other equity (which may include the mandatorily convertible preferred
stock); or, downgrade of Enron's senior unsecured debt below investment grade
by Fitch, S&P or Moody's in conjunction with a decline in Enron's closing
stock price to below $34.13 over three consecutive trading days.
The Marlin transactions provide Enron with an efficient vehicle to monetize
its investment in Wessex and effectively accelerate the process for capital
redeployment. Fitch does not expect the success or failure of AWT asset sales
to materially impact Enron's consolidated credit quality. Currently, Enron's
obligation under this transaction represents a small portion of Enron's asset
portfolio. Enron's core operations demonstrate strong competitive market
positions and provide stable earnings and cash flow contributions. Most
consolidated credit measures are expected to moderately strengthen in 2001.
The company's strategy to increase its return on capital employed and become
more flexible and less asset intensive is reflected in the planned sales of a
significant portion of its global generation assets.

CONTACT: Fitch, New York Ralph Pellecchia, 212/908-0586 or Donna DiDonato,
212/908-0637
11:22 EDT JULY 18, 2001
Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Eddie Gaetchens (?), Marty, and Kevin from Man are coming down Wednesday if anybody is up for dinner or drinks


Georgia Pacific and Bellingham Cold Storage are also large Puget customers.
Attached for your information is a settlement they executed with Puget.


don't worry about it

Shanna Husser@ENRON
06/30/2000 12:54 PM
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Cancun

Why?  Just b/c it wasn't what I was thinking??  You are so argumentative-
maybe you really should consider law school.  No seriously- if that is really
what you would rather- it is not a big deal to me.

But- when the new Harrison Ford movie comes out- we are going to see that.
Opens late July.

	From:  Eric Bass @ ECT                           06/30/2000 12:49 PM

To: Shanna Husser/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Cancun

im thinking perfect storm

Shanna Husser@ENRON
06/30/2000 12:44 PM
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Cancun

the patriot

	From:  Eric Bass @ ECT                           06/30/2000 11:35 AM

To: Shanna Husser/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Cancun

by the way we are going to see either the patriot or the perfect storm
tonight - so decide!

Shanna Husser@ENRON
06/30/2000 10:58 AM
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Cancun

Looks nice.  I just had my meeting with my V.P.- looks like I will be doing
my next rotation through EES tax (starts Aug 15th).  I hear it is a real good
group to work with (real smart and nice people)- but I think they put in a
lot of overtime- especially during federal compliance and some during state
compliance time.  Anyway- state compliance is in September and October- so
going before I rotate in August  might not be a bad idea- although I really
think they would let me take vacation whatever time I asked for.  Side
thought- when in the hell am I going to study for the CPA- especially since I
have NO motivation and I am about to enter a group that has lots of OT.  You
do realize that I am never going to pass that exam- and I'll probably lose my
job- and then either you or my family will just have to take care of me.  I
am feeling a little stressed/anxious today for some reason- in case you
didn't pick up on that.  I definately feel like I need a vacation.

	From:  Eric Bass @ ECT                           06/30/2000 10:23 AM

To: Shanna Husser/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Cancun

check out this site.  louise starts school aug 14, so if we all go it would
have to be before then.
---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 06/30/2000 10:22 AM
---------------------------
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Cancun

Check out www.palaceresorts.com and go to Moon Palace.  Runs about $1200 for
a 3 night stay/couple.  I am not full of shit, I will do it.


fyi  Marg
---------------------- Forwarded by Margaret Carson/Corp/Enron on 08/21/2000
04:17 PM ---------------------------
From: Simon Shih on 08/21/2000 03:57 PM
To: Margaret Carson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject:


I believe the preschedule loss charge is valid for 2/9/01, as I see no loss schedule represented on the scheduling sheet.

c

Virginia Thompson
04/30/2001 05:53 PM
To:	Cara Semperger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Bill Williams III/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:	DMS - 7550 - February Bill

Dear Cara and Bill,

Do you recognize these charges as valid  (Cara for 2-9 and Bill for 2-14)?

Virginia

---------------------- Forwarded by Virginia Thompson/PDX/ECT on 04/30/2001 05:59 PM ---------------------------

	  From:  Amy Clemons @ ENRON                           04/17/2001 05:56 AM

To:	Virginia Thompson/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject:	DMS - 7550 - February Bill

I need to get this settled.  This is the detail Lynn sent me.  Have you or Cara spoken to her about this charge they have invoiced us for?

Let me know
Thank you
Amy
---------------------- Forwarded by Amy Clemons/Corp/Enron on 04/17/2001 07:53 AM ---------------------------

"LYNN RICHARDSON" <LERICHRD@wapa.gov> on 04/13/2001 11:55:51 AM
To:	<amy.clemons@enron.com>
cc:

Subject:	February Bill

Hi Amy!

I tried to return your call from yesterday this morning, but only got your voice mail.

The February bill for $341.90 was for two days:  February 9th and 14th.  February 9th (Tag No. 16259) was priced for 1 MW @ $207.99.  February 14th was a real-time transaction with no tag for less than a MW priced at $133.91.  I checked our records and saw no energy return for losses to WACM from Enron at any time during February.

Please call if you have further questions.

Lynn Richardson
Public Utilities Specialist
RMR
(970) 461-7440


----- Original Message -----
From: "Gina Rodgers" <gsrodger@yahoo.com>
To: "Shannon Withycombe" <skerryw@yahoo.com>; "Kerry Wright"
<kwright@legis.state.ia.us>; "Danielle Yeager" <lmtdani@yahoo.com>; "Jody
Landenberger" <jodylandenberger@hotmail.com>; "Andrew Liao"
<andrew-liao@uiowa.edu>; "Luciana McDonnell" <lucianasugar@yahoo.com>;
"julie nelson" <jknelson73@hotmail.com>; "Rob Rodgers"
<rodgers@kcroyalsfan.com>; "Sue Rodgers" <rrrfarms66@hotmail.com>; "Koty
Sharp" <ksharp@ucsd.edu>; "Rachel Silver" <rach_silver@yahoo.com>; "Alanna
Boyd" <aboyd@circles.com>; "Roger Guzowski"
<guzowskir@facmgmtserver.fm.csus.edu>; "Margret Hjalmarson"
<mhjalmar@math.purdue.edu>
Cc: "Jes Walker" <jeswalker1@yahoo.com>; "Amy Ward Hamilton"
<mahamilton@ev1.net>; "Brian Iceman Wendt" <briandwendt@hotmail.com>;
"Benjamin Mah" <mahctagon@hotmail.com>; "Katy Maturevich"
<kmature@hotmail.com>; "Kim McAtee" <ckmac@avalon.net>; "Amanda Nicoli"
<amandanicoli@excite.com>; "Nat Pearre" <natpearre@netzero.net>; "Kelly
Rhodes (King)" <krhodes@eastpointemfg.com>; "Gwyneth Sharp"
<gwyneth@udel.edu>; "Lyn Avey" <campushouse@kearney.net>; "Brandon Bell"
<Brandon.Bell@frco.com>; "Seth Bell" <sebell@wcnoc.com>; "Neil Coker"
<nilchik@juno.com>; "Jacquelynn Grote" <gingerbread001@yahoo.com>; "Phil
Kean" <kean.philip@mcleodusa.net>
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 11:07 AM
Subject: Your personal financial privacy and new law

> read me!  and don't throw away notices from your fin. institutions until
> you read them!!!
> gina
>
>
> Excerpt from Business Week:
> > In coming weeks, households will receive a torrent of notices from every
> > financial institution with which they do business. Many will dump the
> > deluge as so much junk. If they do, they risk throwing away their right
> > to protect  their privacy over vast swaths of their personal and
> > financial information from name and address to details of assets,
> > income, and debts.

> >    Under new rules now going into effect, financial institutions must
> > disclose what information they collect about their customers, and how
> > they share it, both with affiliates and outside firms. Consumers can't
> > stop in-house sharing, such as by a bank with its brokerage arm, but
> > they must be offered the chance to opt out of sharing with third
> > parties. Hence, the avalanche of mail.

> >    If customers don't object, financial institutions
> > can release customer account numbers to outside marketers or partners
> > who run programs such as air-miles. The rules don't require institutions
> > to make sure that third parties, handling everything from preparing
> > account statements to marketing, keep consumer information under wraps.
> > They don't protect information about people in employee benefit plans,
> > such as 401(k)s, administered by financial companies. And they allow the
> > sharing of extensive customer information that, while not personally
> > identified, can be merged easily with other databases to create detailed
> > portraits of consumers' financial dealings.

> >    Until now, information sharing has been largely unregulated, leaving
> > individual companies to decide how much, or little, they would protect
> > privacy. ``[The new law] extends some important additional protections
> > to consumers about their personal information,'' says Julie L. Williams,
> > chief counsel to the Treasury Dept.'s Office of the Comptroller of the
> > Currency, who played a key role in writing the rules.

> >    But privacy advocates complain the law permits an Orwellian intrusion
> > into consumers' financial lives. Short of an outright ban on sharing of
> > consumer information, they wanted a much stronger opt-in rule that would
> > have prevented information-sharing unless customers positively agreed.
> > ``Consumers have no control over sharing most of their information most
> > of the time,'' complains Ed Mierzwinski, consumer director for the U.S.
> > Public Interest Research Group, a Washington watchdog group.

> >    The rules are even leakier than they appear. For example, financial
> > institutions must protect private information. But if they ``reasonably
> > believe'' that information is publicly available, the data can be shared
> > with third parties. So if information has been published say in a
> > magazine or on a Web site--even if access is restricted by a
> > password--then it's no longer protected. Some joint account holders
> > might be in a strange situation: Though all holders have the right to
> > opt out of disclosure of their information, the rules say financial
> > institutions need send only one notice per account. And employees in
> > benefit plans don't get the chance to protect themselves, as their
> > employers, not they, are considered the customers.

> >    If the new arrangements sound as though they were designed to please
> > banks, brokers, and insurers, that's because they largely were. They are
> > the by-product of a hugely expensive, two decades-long campaign by the
> > financial industry to sweep away Depression-era laws that forbade
> > mergers among banks, brokers, and insurers. The resulting
> > Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, signed in Nov., 1999, aimed to legalize one-stop
> > financial conglomerates such as Citigroup. But it also laid down the
> > parameters for privacy protection.

> >    Financial institutions for the most part aren't adopting completely
> > new privacy policies. Instead, they're codifying their current practice
> > and telling customers about it. Atlanta's SunTrust Banks Inc., for
> > example, uses outside firms to provide services such as credit cards and
> > insurance. If customers don't object, the bank can give suppliers their
> > information, including name, Social Security number, assets, income,
> > account balance, and details of transactions with itself or its
> > affiliates. Some firms, like New York's J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., go
> > further. Its policy allows customer contact information--names,
> > addresses, and phone numbers--to be shared with nonfinancial companies
> > offering travel programs, dental or legal services, and the like.

> >    A few institutions, leery of consumer backlash, have decided not to
> > share information with outsiders. Bank of America Corp., for instance,
> > will handle all customer contact itself if it enters joint marketing
> > projects with third parties.

> >    Still, most of the industry is intent on defending the rules. So far,
> > it has been able to protect its big investment in getting the law
> > changed. If customers don't react to the notices they're now receiving,
> > that investment will be even safer.

>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
> http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
>


Vince,

Greetings.

I have not been advised by Amy Lamonsoff of a planned Risk dinner next
Thur.  If there will not be such a dinner, would your schedule permit a
dinner next Thur.?

Best,
Ehud

==============================================
     Ehud I. Ronn
     Department of Finance
     McCombs School of Business
     University of Texas at Austin
     Austin, TX. 78712-1179
     Voice:  (512) 471-5853
      FAX:   (512) 471-5073
      Internet:  eronn@mail.utexas.edu
=================================================


Paul:  We'll meet Friday at 2 pm to call Jason.  Can you come up to my
office?  Sara

	Paul Radous@ENRON
	11/01/2000 05:37 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Friday conference call

Yes, I am available.  Please name the time.

From: Sara Shackleton@ECT on 11/01/2000 05:36 PM
To: Paul Radous/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: jpeters@andrews-kurth.com

Subject: Friday conference call

Paul:  Please let me know if you can be available for a conference call with
Jason on Friday to discuss Commerzbank and Morgan Stanley Cap Services.
Thanks.  Sara