When I first saw the picture I did think it had a chance of being real, until everyone else said it was a knock off.  I was a little puzzled as to how anyone found the camera.  So at least I had my doubts.  So you want to stay in Calgary another year?

-----Original Message-----
From: Hundt Marian [mailto:MHundt@br-inc.ca]
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 10:42 AM
To: Lucci, Paul T.
Subject: RE: More shocking photos of the man on top of the WTC!!!

I hope you didn't buy it the first time around.

We've been having meetings the last couple of days on our Canadian Hunter acquisition.  It's all very exciting.  It will probably mean I
stay here a little longer which is good with me.  I have more friends here now than I did when I was in Houston so I'd like to stay a while
longer.

I'm going home for my 15 year high school reunion this weekend - should be interesting.

What's new with you?

-----Original Message-----
From: Lucci, Paul T. [mailto:Paul.T.Lucci@ENRON.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 8:33 AM
To: Hundt Marian
Subject: RE: More shocking photos of the man on top of the WTC!!!

That's funny I saw that original picture and was wondering what the hell
was ging on.  We thought it was BS.  Now I know.  What have you been up
to?

-----Original Message-----
From: Hundt Marian [mailto:MHundt@br-inc.ca]
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 8:14 AM
To: Daniel DeLia (E-mail); Gina Verduzco (E-mail); Hilary Thomas
(E-mail); Jeff Sandmann (E-mail); John Hundt (E-mail); John Stephenson
(E-mail); Margie Bendure (E-mail); Paul Lucci (E-mail); Sue Hundt
(E-mail); Todd Braunfeld (personal) (E-mail); Wade Wegner (E-mail)
Subject: More shocking photos of the man on top of the WTC!!!

You have probably seen the first picture before.  Other stunning events
this
>chap was able to witness.
>
>
>

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole
use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at
enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to
be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or
otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Join us for the Kick-off Lunch Today:  MT HOOD  11:30 - 12:30

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dunton, Heather
Sent:	Wednesday, August 29, 2001 6:23 PM
To:	DL-Portland World Trade Center
Subject:	BIKE

BIKE TO WORK MONTH STARTS TUESDAY!

ALL WHO ARE PARTICIPATING
JOIN US FOR THE KICK - OFF LUNCH
TUESDAY SEPT 4TH IN MT HOOD  11:30 - 12:30


And modest too.


Sera 53861


I can't make it this week, but I will bring in your jersey . . . bitch!


James' birthday party is that Saturday.  Before I knew that I was thinking of going home.

Stacey

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Russell White" <russellt@cottonrestorationinc.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, December 06, 2001 9:46 AM
To:	White, Stacey W.
Subject:

Did you Say we had something planned for the  weekend of the 15th in December.


So far I have heard from two Customer Service Reps. on customers contacted about the reinstatement of the Sched. Qty. Report. Nancy Callans has notified NGTS, MUD, UCU and USES.
Bill Aldinger has contacted KTM and Tallahassee.

John Buchanan


Start Date: 2/4/02; HourAhead hour: 10;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002020410.txt


Good Afternoon,

Please note the only adjustment on this spreadsheet will be Electrical District Number Eight.  Please feel free to give me a call, if you have any questions.

Amber N Ebow x5-8331
Global Counterparty_Enron Net Works

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lebrocq, Wendi
Sent:	Tuesday, October 16, 2001 6:09 PM
To:	Lambert, Karen; Jones, Tana; Schott, Samuel; Brackett, Debbie R.; Clark, Cynthia; Enron Europe Global CounterParty,; Sever, Stephanie; Moran, Tom; Clark, Claudia; Bradford, William S.; Lees, Lisa; Fayett, Juana; Morse, Jana; Le, Trang; Maley, Paul; O'day, Karen; Rohauer, Tanya; Lombardi, Kelly; Lindsay, Brian; EOL Call Center; Hare, Bill D.; Heffernan, Amy; Lafuze, Molly; Clark, Danny; Panus, Stephanie; Mandola, Teresa; Ebow, Amber; Coleman, Tandra; Campbell, Lesli; Lebrocq, Wendi; Taylor, Mark E (Legal); Lauer, Kara; Banner, Kimberly; Mcquade, Jennifer; George, Fraisy; Guillory, Michael; Rajaram, Aparna; Monterrey, Maribel; Lebeau, Maria; Escamilla, Albert; Curry, Ken
Subject:	EOL and Clickpaper Approvals for 10-16-01

Please see attached.

 << File: EOL 10-16-01.xls >>
Regards,

Wendi LeBrocq
3-3835


Class Action Lawsuits Alleging Restraint of Trade and Unfair Business
Practices Filed Against SoCal Gas, San Diego Gas & Electric, And El Paso
Natural Gas

LOS ANGELES, Dec. 18 /PRNewswire/  via NewsEdge Corporation  -
Two related class action lawsuits
have been filed in the California Superior Court in Los Angeles, against
Southern California Gas Company, San Diego Gas & Electric Company, Sempra
Energy (parent of the two utilities), El Paso Natural Gas Co., and other
companies related to El Paso Natural Gas.

The two lawsuits allege a conspiracy resulting in restraint of trade and
unfair competition and unlawful business practices.  The complaints summarize
the issue as follows:

This action involves a massive conspiracy to eliminate competition in the
newly deregulated energy industry that has resulted in endangering
California's electrical system and threatening California's economy.  It
is perhaps the largest gouging of energy consumers in American history.
Southern California's current "energy crisis" is not simply the result of
ever-increasing demand by a growing population for energy.  Rather, it is
the direct result of a conspiracy among the natural gas industry's most
powerful Southern California players to preserve and maintain the market
dominance that they enjoyed for many years as monopolies subject to
regulation.  When the artificial monopoly created by regulation was
disassembled, those dominant companies took prompt and illegal action to
ensure that they would not lose the benefits of their market power.  Their
unlawful collusion has contributed significantly to the recent
astronomical increases in the price of natural gas and electricity.  As a
result, Southern California customers have had to pay billions of dollars
extra for their natural gas and electric needs.  This lawsuit seeks to
recover those damages. (Para. 1 and 2 of complaint.)

"In September of 1996, top executives of Southern California Gas Company
("SoCal Gas"), San Diego Gas & Electric ("SDG&E") and El Paso Natural
Gas
Corporation ("EPNG") met at the Embassy Suites Hotel, near Sky Harbor
Airport in Phoenix, Arizona.  Fearing a new era of open competition and
lower prices, these latter day captains of industry gathered secretly to
hatch a conspiracy to dominate the unregulated aspects of the natural gas
and electricity markets.  At the meeting, these three companies, who
together dominate the Southern California natural gas market, illegally
agreed not to compete against each other in the Southern California and
Baja California natural gas delivery markets.  They also conspired to
prevent other pipelines from being built that would have competed against
them and lowered natural gas prices in these markets.  The conspirators
sought to eliminate competition, take advantage of electric deregulation,
drive up the price of natural gas, and profit from the increased prices."
(Para 4 of complaint.)

One of the two lawsuits addresses the effects of the conspiracy on natural
gas prices; the other deals with the effects on electricity prices.
(The price of gas-fired generation establishes the price for most of the
electricity used in Southern California.)

Copies of the two lawsuits filed this morning are available as Adobe
Acrobat (PDF) files on the web site of the law firm of O'Donnell and Shaeffer
at http://oslaw.com/osnews.

Attorneys representing the plaintiffs are available for interviews, and
can also provide additional materials, including copies of the agenda prepared
for the secret meeting, as well as graphics illustrating the location of
natural gas pipelines that were planned, but then terminated by the defendants
following the secret meeting in Phoenix.

For more information contact:  Pierce O'Donnell or Carole E. Handler,
O'Donnell & Shaeffer LLP, (213) 532-2000

SOURCE  O'Donnell & Shaeffer LLP

CONTACT:  Pierce O'Donnell or Carole E. Handler of O'Donnell & Shaeffer
LLP, 213-532-2000
Web site:  http://oslaw.com/osnews

E SOURCE Study:  Customer-Side Electricity Demand Reduction Could Stem Rising
Power Prices

BOULDER, Colo., Dec. 18 /PRNewswire/  via NewsEdge Corporation  -
With electricity prices rising
like floodwaters in California and other states, limited generation capacity
has garnered the most attention as the culprit.  Many see constructing new
power plants as the sole solution for bringing prices down.  However, E SOURCE
research just out of the field indicates that convincing customers to reduce
their electricity demand in exchange for cash could provide tremendous price
relief in open power markets.  "Our study shows that commercial and industrial
customers are very willing to reduce demand if the price is right, if
mechanisms are in place for communicating those prices, and if they have a
means of controlling their electric loads.  We found that larger customers
could offer almost 20 percent of their load as negawatts -- temporary
reductions in electricity demand," says E SOURCE Vice President Bill LeBlanc.

Because most electricity use is considered essential and rising wholesale
prices don't immediately affect end users, prices can go sky high when power
supplies get tight.  But if demand dropped in response to high prices, LeBlanc
contends that overall power costs would be much lower.  He explains, "Although
there's a disconnect between price and demand in the marketplace today, we've
uncovered a significant subset of customers who seem ready to participate in a
dynamic pricing market.  Unfortunately, most of them don't yet have the
communication and control tools that would make load management possible.
They also haven't been offered a pricing product they like."  The E SOURCE
research study confirms that customers want flexibility in deciding whether to
participate in load reductions on a daily or even hourly basis, as just one
example.

So how many negawatts are available?  According to the E SOURCE national
market survey, medium-to-large commercial and industrial customers could
potentially reduce their demand by 18 percent if offered a market price of $1
per kWh (one of the tested price points) for reduced electricity usage.  At
this price -- which, incidentally, is what Edison International CEO and
President John Bryson reported that his company paid for electricity on
December 12 in wholesale power markets -- about 55,000 MW could be made
available across the U.S., and about 4,800 MW in California.  LeBlanc adds,
"We can't expect to capture all of this potential.  But with the right
product, pricing scheme, and marketing, it would be possible to help relieve
price pressure on the whole system."  The E SOURCE study, "Energy Pricing and
Load Management:  What Do End-Users Want?" can help energy service providers
design appropriate products and identify the customer groups most likely to
participate in such programs.  It's based on an extensive research with over
700 energy decision-makers across the U.S. and Canada.

For further information about "Energy Pricing and Load Management," please
call Bill LeBlanc at 720-548-5476 or Tia Hensler, market research director, at
720-548-5614.

SOURCE  E SOURCE

CONTACT:  Bill LeBlanc, 720-548-5476, or Tia Hensler, market research
director, 720-548-5614, both for E SOURCE
Web site:  http://www.esource.com


Thanks for the help, but I don't think I asked the right question.  I need
the the twenty biggest customers on the purchase side.  Sorry for the
misuderstanding.
If you could send a list that would be great.  No hurry, sorry again for the
inconvenience.


Please click on the link below

SAVE THE DATE


Decline in euro area HICP inflation confirmed

     Euro area headline HICP inflation (October)

     Actual             2.4%
     UBSW               2.4%
     Consensus          2.4%
     Previous           2.5%

     Euro area core HICP inflation (October)

     Actual             2.3%
     UBSW               2.3%
     Consensus          2.2%
     Previous           2.2%

     Bottom line: Euro area headline inflation decelerated as expected to
     2.4% in October from 2.5% due to energy prices. This is in line with
     consensus expectations and the "flash" estimate published by Eurostat
     earlier in the month. Euro area core inflation (CPI less all food and
     energy) accelerated to 2.3% in October from 2.2% in September. This
     was above initial consensus estimates of 2.2% but probably widely
     expected following preliminary French and German national CPI data
     which indicated higher core inflation.

     The rise in core inflation is clearly an issue for the ECB but we
     would expect them to play down the acceleration in core inflation and
     focus instead on the fall in headline inflation. Headline inflation
     was 2.0% or below in 4 economies in October, up from 3 in September.
     The ECB expects headline inflation to decelerate sharply during early
     2002 - the recent declines in oil prices, if sustained, are likely to
     add to that sentiment.  We expect slower growth leading to lower
     pipeline inflation pressures along with base effects to generate firm
     expectations of a marked decline in inflation during 2002. This
     underpins our expectation of a further 50bp of policy rate cuts from
     the ECB in Q1 2002.


Chris - do you mind cking to see if this is accurate!

Thanks
Lynn
---------------------- Forwarded by Lynn Handlin/ENERGY/TXU on 04/22/2002
12:25 PM ---------------------------

Nneka P Settle
04/22/2002 09:49 AM

To:   Lynn Handlin/ENERGY/TXU@TXUE
cc:

Subject:  Ponderosa Pine prepayments

We are trying to match up the March 02 Ponderosa prepays with what is
currently in GasMaster and the two numbers do not equal.  Did they prepay
more than the nominated March deals?  Also could you confirm whether the
following are all the prepays that we received from Ponderosa.

02/28/02  63,750
03/01/02  111,600
03/04/02  187,500
03/08/02  128,450
03/15/02  388,000


----- Forwarded by Miyung Buster/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 10/09/2000 09:27 AM
-----

	djcustomclips@djinteractive.com
	10/04/2000 04:25 PM
	Please respond to nobody

		 To: 86464@WCTOPICS.djnr.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Utilities, Electric: Deregulation: USA: Calif. utilities seek ISO
power price cap cut to ...

Reuters
USA: Calif. utilities seek ISO power price cap cut to $100.
?
10/04/2000
Reuters English News Service
(C) Reuters Limited 2000.

SAN FRANCISCO, Oct 4 (Reuters) - Pacific Gas and Electric Co (PG&E) said
Wednesday it is joining with Southern California Edison and a California
consumer group to seek a reduction of the Independent System Operator (ISO)
price cap for electricity to $100.00 per megawatt hour (MWh) from the current
$250.00 cap.

PG&E, the utility subsidiary of San Francisco-based PGOCorp. , proposed the
lower price cap as part of a broader package of steps it is taking to "make
sure the California power market can operate more efficiently," a company
official told reporters at a briefing here.

Southern California Edison is the utility subsidiary of Edison International
, based in Rosemead, Calif.

PGOsaid the request was backed by The Utility Reform Network (TURN), a San
Francisco-based consumer group that has protested against soaring electricity
prices as a result of California's bid to deregulate its electricity industry.

The California ISO, established as part of the deregulation effort, oversees
the operation of about 75 percent of the state's power grid, serving some 27
million people.

The move by PGOand Edison follows a summer of chaos in the California power
market, where a shortage of electricity generated within the state and open
market power pricing sent the cost of wholesale power to nearly twice its
historical average, frequently trading above the proposed $100.00 cap.

Folder Name: Utilities, Electric: Deregulation
Relevance Score on Scale of 100: 97

______________________________________________________________________
To review or revise your folder, visit Dow Jones CustomClips or contact Dow
Jones Customer  Service by e-mail at custom.news@bis.dowjones.com or by phone
at 800-369-7466. (Outside the U.S. and  Canada, call 609-452-1511 or contact
your local sales representative.)
______________________________________________________________________
Copyright (c) 2000 Dow Jones &Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved


<<NDA's - Morningstar Systems and Insource Technology>> Your message

  To:      bill.breslin@insource.com
  Cc:      Will.Zamer@enron.com; Mark.Greenberg@enron.com
  Subject: NDA's - Morningstar Systems and Insource Technology
  Sent:    Thu, 29 Mar 2001 15:12:16 -0600

was delivered to the following recipient(s):

Breslin, Bill on Thu, 29 Mar 2001 15:11:45 -0600

Message-ID: <OFF1DA3F06.81329150-ON86256A1E.0074059E@enron.com>
From: Tana.Jones@enron.com
To: bill.breslin@insource.com
Cc: Will.Zamer@enron.com, Mark.Greenberg@enron.com
Subject: NDA's - Morningstar Systems and Insource Technology
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 15:12:16 -0600
Return-Receipt-To: Tana.Jones@enron.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
X-MS-Embedded-Report:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"


-----Original Message-----
From: Barthel, Christina
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 11:05 AM
To: Morrow, Mark; Husser, Shanna; Tian, Amy
Subject: appropriate for us these days

-----Original Message-----
From: Gibson, Stacy
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 11:03 AM
To: Barthel, Christina; Richards, Todd; Sharp, Michelle; Jon, Amy; Kacal, Lynna
Subject: FW: Memo From God [this is nice]

thought this was relevant right now.

    MEMO FROM GOD
  <http://www.webspirations.net/images/Btflysilver.gif>
To: YOU
Date: TODAY
From: THE BOSS
Subject: YOURSELF
Reference: LIFE
I am God. Today I will be handling all of your problems. Please remember that I do not need your help.
If life happens to deliver a situation to you that you cannot handle, do not attempt to resolve it. Kindly put it in the SFGTD (something for God to do) box. All situations will be resolved, but in My time, not yours.
  <http://www.webspirations.net/images/sfgtd.gif>
Once the matter is placed into the box, do not hold onto it by worrying about it.  Instead, focus on all the wonderful things that are present in your life now.
  <http://www.webspirations.net/images/swing.gif>
If you find yourself stuck in traffic; Don't despair. There are people in this world for whom driving is an unheard of privilege.
  <http://www.webspirations.net/images/traffic.gif>
Should you have a bad day at work; Think of the man who has been out of work for years.
  <http://www.webspirations.net/images/man_walk.gif>
Should you despair over a relationship gone bad; Think of the person who has never known what it's like to love and be loved in return.
  <http://www.webspirations.net/images/rockincrotchity1x1.gif>
Should you grieve the passing of another weekend;  Think of the woman in dire straits, working twelve hours a day, seven days a week to feed her children.
  <http://www.webspirations.net/images/sew2.gif>
Should your car break down, leaving you miles away from assistance; Think of the paraplegic who would love the opportunity to take that walk.
  <http://www.webspirations.net/images/wheelchr.gif>
Should you notice a new gray hair in the mirror; Think of the cancer patient in chemo who wishes she had hair to examine.
  <http://www.webspirations.net/images/nurse_use.gif>
Should you find yourself at a loss and pondering what is life all about, asking what is my purpose? Be thankful. There are those who didn't live long enough to get the opportunity.
  <http://www.webspirations.net/images/angel_baby.jpg>
Should you find yourself the victim of other people's bitterness, ignorance, smallness or insecurities; Remember, things could be worse. You could be one of them!
  <http://www.webspirations.net/images/women_talking.gif>
Should you decide to send this to a friend; Thank you, you may have touched their life in ways you will never know!


Reliant has sent me the draft and is in my files under Reliant Redline
(Canada)

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490

----- Forwarded by Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT on 05/25/2001 03:53 PM -----

	"Nachawati, Majed" <Majed.Nachawati@ENRON.com>
	05/22/2001 02:31 PM

		 To: <dperlin@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Majed's Schedule and Phone Number (Summer Law Clerk)

Debra,

 Here is my schedule: Monday - Friday: 8:00 a.m.-6:00 p.m. each
day.

 Phone Number: Extension 52722.

Please let me know if you need help with anything!

Thank you,

 Majed Nachawati


---------------------- Forwarded by Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT on 10/09/2000
01:49 PM ---------------------------

"Modi, Rishi" <rishi.modi@csfb.com> on 10/09/2000 11:42:35 AM
To: "'benjamin.rogers@enron.com'" <benjamin.rogers@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: data room procedures

This message is for the named person's use only.  It may contain
confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information.  No
confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.
If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and
all
copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify
the
sender.  You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose,
distribute,
print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended
recipient. CREDIT SUISSE GROUP and each of its subsidiaries each reserve
the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks.
Any
views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender,
except
where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state
them to be the views of any such entity.
Unless otherwise stated, any pricing information given in this message
is
indicative only, is subject to change and does not constitute an offer
to
deal at any price quoted.
Any reference to the terms of executed transactions should be treated as
preliminary only and subject to our formal written confirmation.

 - procedures.doc


Notice No. 01-183
June 6, 2001

TO:
All NYMEX Division Members
All COMEX Division Members
All NYMEX Member Firms
All COMEX Member Firms

FROM:
Neal Wolkoff, Executive Vice President

RE:
Briefing on Brent Market

There will be an informational seminar on the fundamentals of the Brent crude
market at 3:30 PM on Thursday, June 7, 2001 in the Seminar Room on the 10th
floor of the Exchange building.  The purpose of this meeting is to inform
potential NYMEX Brent traders about the factors that influence price and
other key issues unique to the Brent market.

There is no cost and attendance is open to all interested parties.

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=tana.jones@enron.com&refdo
c=(01-183)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


---------------------- Forwarded by Andrea Ring/HOU/ECT on 05/02/2001 03:38
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Karen D McIlvoy                           04/10/2001 08:20 AM

To: ragan.bond@bhlp.com
cc:  (bcc: Andrea Ring/HOU/ECT)
Subject: Fwd:

A beautiful woman loved growing tomatoes, but couldn't seem to get her
tomatoes to turn red. One day while taking a stroll she came upon a
gentleman neighbor who had the most beautiful garden full of huge red
tomatoes.

The woman asked the gentleman, "What do you do to get your tomatoes so
red?" The gentleman responded, "Twice a day I stand in front of my tomato
garden and expose myself, and my tomatoes turn red from blushing so much."

 The woman was so impressed, she decided to try doing the same
 thing to her tomato garden to see if it would work. So twice a day for two
weeks she exposed herself to her garden hoping for the best

  One day the gentleman was passing by and asked the woman, "By the way,
How did you make out? Did your tomatoes turn red?"

"No" she replied, "but my cucumbers are enormous!"


A helpful FERC order as we work on asset management deals:

New Horizon Electric Cooperative Inc. v. Duke Power Company, EL00-101-001.
Order on Rehearing. Order issued October 11, 2000 addressing a complaint by
New Horizon Electric Cooperative, Inc (New Horizon) against Duke Power Co.
(Duke) seeking FERC resolution of four disputed issues, including treatment
of energy imbalances not prevented by dynamic scheduling. New Horizon's
complaint claimed that energy imbalance service does not apply to it, since
it will employ dynamic scheduling to effectively remove its load from Duke's
control area. Further, New Horizon maintained that any deviation between the
dynamic schedule and the actual metered delivery of energy constituted
inadvertent interchange energy (which is the net difference between actual
and scheduled interchange energy between two control areas) and proposed that
any differences would be returned in-kind within two hours. On November 9,
New Horizon filed a request for rehearing or clarification of the October 11
Order. Order issued February 26 granting New Horizon's request for rehearing
or clarification of the October 11 Order. Order clarifies that, to the extent
dynamic scheduling by New Horizon operates successfully; New Horizon should
not be subject to charges under Duke's Schedule 4 Energy Imbalance Service.
In such circumstances, any imbalances between energy deliveries on behalf of
New Horizon and New Horizon's load should be accounted for by Duke as
inadvertent interchanges only. In addition, Order directed parties to
negotiate in good faith to establish a standard for the successful operation
of dynamic scheduling.


The issue taking time to resolve is the ability to disclose under the
existing agreement, even with an NDA.  Will keep you posted.  One smaller
issue on the NDA is that ISO wants to make sure that info can't be given to
the Enron power affiliates.  I assume thatr won't be a problem.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2000 4:04 PM
To: jtobin@mofo.com
Subject: NDA Redux

Greetings:

Dennis (and you) getting comfortable with the NDA?

Best,
Jeff

============================================================================

This message contains information which may be confidential and privileged.
Unless you are the addressee (or authorized to receive for the addressee),
you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone the message or any information
contained in the message.  If you have received the message in error, please
advise the sender by reply e-mail @mofo.com, and delete the message.
Thank you very much.

============================================================================


I'd like us to take a stab at drafting the California strategy so we can
present initial thoughts at the meeting I'm hoping to set up next Wednesday
in D.C.  (Discussed under separate e-mail).  To that end, I suggest the
following outline for the strategy:

What are our specific business interests in California?  Let's be as specific
as possible, but limit the list to "hot buttons."   In this regard, Jim
Steffes identified "the imposition of price caps in the summer of 2001" as
the hot button.  Are there others?
What are the forums we expect will affect our business interests?
For each forum, how do we want to posture Enron?  Do we want to be the most
aggressive company?  Do we want to act alone?  Do we want to work only in
coalitions?  What about IEP?  What will motivate us to act independently?
What is our overall strategy?  Do we want to go back to our pre-1999
rhetoric?  We can scream louder than anyone else that California didn't do it
right..  Peace will be gone ... should we breach Steve K.'s promise to play
nice?  Do we want to tear down AB 1890 or shore it up?
Forum-by-forum identify our:  (a) goals; (b) strategy; (c) what we (Enron)
want out of the forum.  For example, re:  the legislature, do we want to
identify legislation that we will seek affirmatively?  If not, why not?


great job...i am impressed.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jennifer Reitmeyer [mailto:jennsreit@houston.rr.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 9:13 AM
To: Jay
Subject: computer

I got everything hooked up , I guess.  You need to straighten out the cords
this weekend.


Here are five articles pertaining to Enron and the offer we made in San
Diego. I am looking for others.

Karen Denne remarks in the San Diego Union Tribune that Enron has offered
fixed price contracts and that Enron customers have not been effected by this
price spike. July 25, 2000

The article below states that Enron has put an offer for energy at 5.5
cents/KWh on the table, and others are
expected to provide a variety of possible deals. July 16, 2000 San Diego
Union Tribune (SDUT)

Enron has already made one offer, but the
price is too high and the terms are too long. July 11, 2000 SDUT

The local utility, a unit of Sempra Energy, denied reports yesterday that it
would soon reach an agreement with Enron Corp. on a deal that would lock
in power rates for years for a large segment of its customer base... The
initial offer from Enron was to provide power for four years at 5.5
cents per kilowatt, according to Peace, who emphasized he hoped SDG&E would
receive competing bids from other companies.
Hoge said Enron's track record and the nature of long-term power contracts
made her skeptical that such a deal could save San Diego money.
"With fixed contracts, you always end up paying more than you should on the
other end," she said. "And Enron always has a way to make these contracts
work for them." July 11, 2000 SDUT

Concerning Enron ..."This is no better than a boiler fraud on the people,"
said Harvey
Rosenfield, who unsuccessfully pressed a ballot initiative to overturn
deregulation. "They jack up rates over 200 percent -- then they offer you a
deal at a 50 percent hike.

"I don't think the solution to this problem is to put the people of San
Diego at the mercy of Enron."

Enron is offering to sell San Diego power for four years at 5.5 cents per
kilowatt hour,
according to Peace. The price would be about 50 percent less than current
costs, but more than 50 percent above rates paid as recently as this
spring.


most bullish thing at this point is moving closer to everyone's psychological
$4 price target and that everybody and their dog is still short.  next
sellers need to be from producer community.  saw a little this week with
williams hedging the barrett transaction but wouldnt say thats indicative of
the rest of the e&p community.  short covering rallies will get more common
here.  velocity of move down has slowed significantly for good (except maybe
in bid week).  my concern is if we go to $4 and people want to cover some
shorts, who's selling it to them?  might feel a lot like it did when we were
trying to break $5.


I changed the dates to 1999.
D

Fred Boas
06/07/2000 10:09 AM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Duke Energy Deal 269123 for July & November 2000?

Daren:

Thanks again for your prompt attention to this matter, I appreciate it.

There is a slight problem however, I couldn't find the deals for July and
November 1999 in Path Manager.  I looked in Sitara and I see where you put
the deal 269123 in for May 1999, but it is also in for July and November of
2000.  Did you mean to put the deal in for July and November of 1999 and
inadvertently put it in for July and November 2000?  If so would you put it
in for July and November 1999 and send me an e-mail when you are done.
Thanks,

Fred

Daren J Farmer
06/06/2000 10:32 AM
To: Fred Boas/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Duke Energy - # 5192 - 1999 Issues

Apply deal 269123 to contract 012-27049-201.

D

Fred Boas
06/05/2000 03:50 PM
To: Stephanie Gomes/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Aimee Lannou/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert E
Lloyd/HOU/ECT@ECT, Howard B Camp/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Duke Energy - # 5192 - 1999 Issues

Stephanie:

Meter 6757 is done, redraft your invoice for both months and let me know if
this meter is still an issue.

Meter 5192.  I never heard back from Aimee on which Transport contract to
attach the deal 269123 to so for the months in question the gas is still
allocated to the Strangers Gas contract.  Aimee is out on vacation until
mid-June so I put in a call to Daren Farmer to find out which Transport
contract I should attach the deal 269123 to.

When I find out which transport contract to use I will set up the accounting
arrangements and then get Robert Lloyd to put the contract in POPS and
reallocate.

Fred

	From:  Stephanie Gomes                           06/01/2000 08:55 AM

To: Fred Boas/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Duke Energy - meter # 6757 , # 5192 - issue for 1999

Hey Fred,
I have the deal numbers for you for Duke Energy.  Could you please let me
know when you have allocated the gas to these meters.
I am also forwarding other emails about these two deals for your records.  If
you have any questions, please give me a call.
Thanks, Stephanie

meter # 0986757 deal # 266962     4/1/99 - 4/30/99    and   5/1/99 - 5/31/99
meter # 0985192 deal # 269123     5/1/99 - 5/31/99    and   7/1/99 - 7/31/99

---------------------- Forwarded by Stephanie Gomes/HOU/ECT on 06/01/2000
08:45 AM ---------------------------
   Aimee Lannou                05/11/2000 03:45 PM

To: Fred Boas/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Howard B Camp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Gomes/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Crow O'Connor Meter 6757

Fred  & Stephanie-  Meter 6757 has been reallocated.

Stephanie - What price does Duke show we owe them for the months in question?

Fred Boas
05/11/2000 03:18 PM
To: Aimee Lannou/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Robert E Lloyd/HOU/ECT@ECT, Howard B Camp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie
Gomes/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Crow O'Connor Meter 6757

Aimee:
Please put the ENA 201 contract at this meter for April and May of 1999 with
the Track ID 117848 and reallocate the meter for both months.  After this is
done please let Stephanie and I know so that she can redraft her invoice the
next day after POPS bridges to MOPS.  Also with respect to the second issue
where Daren is asking for the price, Stephanie may be able to help you with
this because she has a copy of Duke's invoice.

Stephanie:
The Crow O'Conner meter is essentially fixed.  When Aimee reallocates you
will have to wait until the next day to redraft your invoice.  When Aimee
gets back with us please redraft the invoice the next day and let me know if
this issue is resolved.

Fred

Daren J Farmer
05/11/2000 02:14 PM
To: Aimee Lannou/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Fred Boas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: Sarco Lateral and Crow O'Connor Meters

I have created deal 266962 for the volumes at mtr 6757.

What price is Duke reporting for the mtr 5192 volumes?  The only activity
we've had out there is payback with Koch.

D

   Aimee Lannou                05/09/2000 03:30 PM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Fred Boas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Sarco Lateral and Crow O'Connor Meters

Daren - Have you had a chance to look at this?

- Aimee
---------------------- Forwarded by Aimee Lannou/HOU/ECT on 05/09/2000 03:26
PM ---------------------------
   Aimee Lannou                05/04/2000 03:26 PM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Fred Boas/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Sarco Lateral and Crow O'Connor Meters

Daren - Can you set up new deals for meter 6757 and 5192?

 Meter 6757 Crow O'Connor -  Counterparty Duke Energy & Trading

  Month  Contract Deal #
  June 99  ENA 201 87426
  July 99  HPL 215 95072
  Aug 99  HPL 215 102775
  Sept 99  HPL 215 110502

 Meter 5192 Sarco Lateral

  No deal has ever been set up for meter 5192 for Duke Energy & Trading.
There is flow for May, July and Nov. 99.

Will you please let me know if you set up new deals for these meters?

Thanks.

Aimee
---------------------- Forwarded by Aimee Lannou/HOU/ECT on 05/04/2000 03:17
PM ---------------------------

Fred Boas
05/04/2000 12:08 PM
To: Aimee Lannou/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Robert E Lloyd/HOU/ECT@ECT, Howard B Camp/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Sarco Lateral and Crow O'Connor Meters

Aimee:

The Crow O'Connor, meter 6757 has its gas allocated to Strangers Gas for
April and May 1999 and Duke has been calling Settlements asking for their
money.  I will need to set up accounting arrangements for this meter for
these months so please provide me the correct transportation contract and
valid deal # for this transaction.

In addition, the Sarco Lateral, meter 5192 has its gas allocated to Strangers
Gas for May and July 1999 and Duke has been calling Settlements asking for
their money.  I will need to set up accounting arrangements for this meter
for these months so please provide me the correct transportation contract and
valid deal # for this transaction.

I would like to get this done ASAP since the customer is calling Settlements
and we start close next week.

Thanks,

Fred


Susan:  you need to log this in.  I'm leaving early today.  SS
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 06/02/2000 01:19 PM -----

	John Suttle
	06/02/2000 10:45 AM

		 To: Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara
Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Twister Omnibus/Assignment

Team,

I have had a few conversations over the past couple of days with Terry
Brownrigg at Twister Gas Services, LLC and Todd Tharp with Sanguine, Ltd..
We transacted with Twister last week and I had sent you a credit worksheet
for the transaction.  Twister is a broker who transacts on behalf of small
E&P companies, and in this case, the E&P agreed to post the L/C we quoted for
the transaction.  After talking to Sara, it sounds like we are going to go
ahead and send a confirmation to Twister for the deal and attach to the
confirmation an assignment of the deal from Twister to Sanguine.  It is my
understanding that both Terry and Todd will need to sign both the
confirmation and the assignment, so I think we will need to carefully
coordinate the steps through the Confirmation Desk (Sheetal Patel).

I have attached a worksheet for the transaction (Sanguine agreed to post
$500K).  Please coordinate with Sara, Sheetal and me in getting this out.

The contact information at Sanguine is:
Todd Tharp
Manager of Gas Contracts
Sanguine, Ltd.
1861 East 71st Street South
Tulsa, Ok 74136

Thanks,

John


Michael Hayes - cell phone - 781-367-8828


Twanda, would you please print this and attachment?  THX----- Forwarded by
Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT on 05/18/2000 09:07 AM -----

	Pam Butler@ENRON
	04/06/2000 07:39 PM

		 To: Felecia Acevedo/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT, Johnna Young/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Drew C
Lynch/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kathryn Schultea/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary
Joyce/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Re: Company Structure File

Felecia, thanks so much for the listing of companies whose employees are paid
directly by Enron which includes legal name, % ownership, employee count,
etc.  Great work and excellent due diligence.  As we discussed, you are in
the process of researching and documenting the same information for the
non-payroll companies which of course is critical for completing our due
diligence with respect to the new AESOP.

In order to get this information for determining AESOP participation, and as
we dscussed today, we are asking the HR leadership team to work with their
business units to provide us with all non-payroll company names (to provide
legal name, if different), % ownership, whether or not the company is part of
Enron's consolidated reporting group (if not, why) and number of employees.
They will also give us a "yes" or "no" at this time as to whether their
Business Unit Head wishes for the company to participate in AESOP.  We are
asking them to forward this file to you, as we discussed, to assist you with
data collection.  We would ask that you coordinate the necessary Legal review
of ownership levels with Michelle Cash.  We will facilitate with Johnna Young
a review of whether we will have any accounting issues with granting options
to employees of each respective company.    We have a tight turnaround, of
course, as outlined in today's meeting, but hopefully we have good game plan
to get us to where we need to be.

Note to Johnna:  Johnna, attached please see Felicia's file on domestic for
your initial review.

Thanks again, Felecia, for your help.

Pam

Felecia Acevedo
04/05/2000 10:59 AM
To: Pam Butler/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Company Structure File

Pam,

Here is the file


Start Date: 4/17/01; HourAhead hour: 7;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041707.txt


---------------------- Forwarded by Craig Breslau/HOU/ECT on 11/28/2000 08:49
AM ---------------------------

SPierce@uss.com on 11/28/2000 08:32:40 AM
To: SPierce@uss.com
cc:
Subject: DECEMBER NATURAL GAS REQUEST FOR QUOTE

Please respond to the attached request for quote via e:mail.

(See attached file: 1200RFQ1.xls)
 - 1200RFQ1.xls


WSCC STANDARDS CORRESPONDENTS
WESTERN MARKET INTERFACE COMMITTEE
COMPLIANCE PROCESS TASK FORCE
OPERATIONS COMMITTEE AND
    OC SUBCOMMITTEES
PLANNING COORDINATION COMMITTEE
   AND PCC SUBCOMMITTEES

This is to provide clarification of the earlier message announcing
the posting of Majority Accepted BP for WSCC New DP2
(containing only Practices 10 and 17).  The full list of Business
Practices with only BP #10 modified from the earlier version was
posted for comment on August 1, 2001.  We received very few
comments over the next 60 days.

At its October 25-26 meeting, the OC agreed to have these two
business practices posted, # 10 for an additional 60 days as only
one comment was received relative to BP #10.  Other comments
were related to items already approved by ISAS and OC vote.
Business Practice # 17 is being offered for Due Process as
requested by the OC (due to an OC member's request that WSCC
become more consistent with NERC Policy 3 and the Eastern
Interconnection).  Hence, the OC and ISAS Chairs are requesting
comments about leaving #17 in the WSCC Business Practices or
removing it all together.

Bill Comish

Ph: 801-582-0353
Fax: 801-582-3918


saw a lot of the bulls sell summer against length in front to mitigate
margins/absolute position limits/var.  as these guys are taking off the
front, they are also buying back summer.  el paso large buyer of next winter
today taking off spreads.  certainly a reason why the spreads were so strong
on the way up and such a piece now.   really the only one left with any risk
premium built in is h/j now.   it was trading equivalent of 180 on access,
down 40+ from this morning.  certainly if we are entering a period of bearish
to neutral trade, h/j will get whacked.  certainly understand the arguments
for h/j.  if h settles $20, that spread is probably worth $10.  H 20 call was
trading for 55 on monday.  today it was 10/17.  the market's view of
probability of h going crazy has certainly changed in past 48 hours and that
has to be reflected in h/j.

slafontaine@globalp.com on 12/13/2000 04:15:51 PM
To: slafontaine@globalp.com
cc: John.Arnold@enron.com
Subject: re:spreads

mkt getting a little more bearish the back of winter i think-if we get another
cold blast jan/feb mite move out. with oil moving down and march closer flat
px
wide to jan im not so bearish these sprds now-less bullish march april as
well.


Bobbi,

Attached are the final numbers for the interruptible balancing for November,
2000.  I have also attached a tentative schedule for December, 2000 for both
the firm and interruptible.  Those schedules will probably be revised once we
get through December 1st nominations and "boo-boos".

Thanks


What is our cash needs over the week to ten days? Ned for mcmahon meeting at 1.
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


> Subject: FW: Sample Ballot In West Palm Beach
>
>
>
>
>    <<BallotWPBF11_.doc>>

******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it from El Paso
Energy Corporation are confidential and intended solely
for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
addressed. If you have received this email in error
please notify the sender.
******************************************************************

 - BallotWPBF11_.doc


--
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE   CONTACT: James Fisfis
March 5, 2001        (916) 319-2071

GOP MOVES NATURAL GAS TO FRONT BURNER
Assembly Republicans join together once again to request Davis to call
special session.

(SACRAMENTO) ) Assembly Republicans united Monday in asking Governor Gray
Davis to call a special session of the California legislature to deal with
skyrocketing natural gas prices.

&Families and businesses are reeling every month from extraordinary gas
prices.  Pardon the expression, but the natural gas crisis no longer belongs
on California,s back burner,8 said Assembly Republican leader Bill Campbell
(R ) Villa Park).

Assembly Republicans unanimously signed a letter to Governor Gray Davis
asking for him to convene a special session of the legislature to deal with
California,s skyrocketing natural gas bills.  Republicans delivered the
letter to Davis this morning.

&A special session is both a symbolic and a practical necessity.  It tells
Californians that we care about their skyrocketing gas bills.  It tells
businesses everywhere that California is going to provide for its future
energy needs,8 said Campbell.  &Practically speaking, a special session also
allow us to pass legislation which can take effect immediately.8

Republicans believe the electricity and natural gas crises are inextricably
linked.

&California,s natural gas crisis is completely intertwined with its
electricity crisis,8 said Campbell.  &Any plan to deal with our electricity
crisis must have a natural gas component or Californians are going to pay
unacceptably high prices for both.8

Assembly Republicans believe the natural gas crisis has many fronts, all of
which could be addressed comprehensively by a special session.

&Natural gas issues include pipeline capacity, storage, exploration,
alternative fuels and conservation,8 said Campbell.  &A special session lets
us put together a comprehensive solution.8

&The private sector has the expertise and the capital to deal with these
issues if government would just get out of the way.  Republicans believe that
a legislative solution to the natural gas crisis should leave the resources
and primary decision-making to the private sector,8 said Campbell.

# # #
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 03/05/2001 05:44 PM -----

	Susan J Mara
	03/05/2001 05:14 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Today's Assembly GOP press conference - materials

in case you didn't see this

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 03/05/2001 03:12 PM -----

	"Costigan, Richard" <Richard.Costigan@asm.ca.gov>
	03/05/2001 02:51 PM

		 To:
		 cc:
		 Subject: Today's Assembly GOP press conference - materials

 <<press release.doc>>  <<Natgastps - rep legislation.doc>>  <<Republican
Energy Address.doc>>  <<QA.doc>>  <<DOE powerpoint.ppt>>

Attached are documents that were part of today's Assembly GOP press
conference on the pending natural gas crisis.  If you have any questions,
please call me.

Thanks,

RSC

Richard Costigan, III
Chief of Staff
Office of the Assembly Republican Leader
California State Assembly
(916) 319-2071

 - press release.doc
 - Natgastps - rep legislation.doc
 - Republican Energy Address.doc
 - QA.doc
 - DOE powerpoint.ppt