as discussed
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/HOU/EES on 08/02/2000 05:19
PM ---------------------------

Leonardo Pacheco@ENRON
08/02/2000 03:41 PM
To: Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Eric Thode/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jackie Gentle/LON/ECT@ECT, Andrew Miles/HOU/EES@EES, Rob
Bradley/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Koenig/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Philippe A
Bibi/HOU/ECT@ECT, George McClellan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryan Seyfried/LON/ECT@ECT,
Rick Buy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg Piper/Corp/Enron@Enron, Fred Lagrasta/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Edward D Baughman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Craig Breslau/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael
McDonald/SF/ECT@ECT, Grant Oh/CAL/ECT@ECT, Harold Bertram/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cary M
Carrabine/Corp/Enron@Enron, Edward Ondarza/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Tawney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Per Sekse/NY/ECT@ECT, Thomas D Gros/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janet R
Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT, Max Yzaguirre/NA/Enron@ENRON, Greg Wolfe/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Brian Bierbach/DEN/ECT@Enron, Brian Redmond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kathryn
Corbally/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Stuart Staley/LON/ECT@ECT, Kevin
McGowan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Peter Bradley/LON/ECT@ECT, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT,
John Ambler/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, George
Wasaff/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Meredith
Philipp/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lisa
Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Gopalan/LON/ECT@ECT, Kal Shah/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg
Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daniel Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael
Danielson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda F Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Pickering/LON/ECT@ECT, Don Cornwell/Corp/Enron@Enron, Richard
Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Stephanie Miller/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Anthony
Dayao/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ricardo Lisboa/SA/Enron@Enron, Remi
Collonges/SA/Enron@Enron, Katrin Haux/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Suryan Wirya Simunovic/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron, James A
Ajello/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ted Seitz/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Jim
Crowder/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Mitch Olson/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, John McClain/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Dan Minter/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Bill
Abler/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Emily Wander/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Jay Hawthorn/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Jeff Bartlett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jonathan Whitehead/AP/Enron@Enron,
Alan Engberg/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joseph P Hirl/AP/ENRON@ENRON
cc: Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amita
Gosalia/LON/ECT@ECT, David Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron, Bob Schorr/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Rahil Jafry/HOU/ECT@ECT, George Hope/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tara Sweitzer/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Public Report 08-01

Please find attached the current copy of the EnronOnline Daily Public Report
and Key Messages, including slides and statistics for public consumption.
The information contained in the attachments can be communicated to audiences
outside the company and should be used to ensure that we present a consistent
message to the public. Please ensure that this email is distributed to anyone
in your group who needs to discuss EnronOnline with individuals outside the
company.

Please note that this report is not intended to be used as a stand-alone
presentation, nor that all the information be used in a single presentation
or customer communication.


Please note the Change:
    ENA VP Pre-Ranking Committee Meeting -July 7

As we move into the Spring/Summer of 2000, it is time to turn our attention
to the performance review process.  Mid-year is always busy and we have a
number of important tasks and projects in process.  While recognizing this,
it remains extremely important to take time over the next few weeks to gather
necessary information to provide quality and meaningful feedback for our
employees, as well as utilize this information during the year end review
process.

In the spirit of One Enron, the Performance Review Process (PRC) will be
global for Mid-year 2000.  Vice Presidents and above across all operating
companies will be reviewed and discussed in a consistent manner with
identical criteria.   ENA will review all professional level and above
employees.  The timeline and training for the midyear process are outlined at
the end of this memo.  Your HR Business Consultant is also available to
answer questions.

With regards to the Global Functions, review sessions will be led by the
Global and/or Corporate Functional heads, and will be designed to calibrate
personnel within these areas of expertise.  The Global Functional Review
Areas include:

_ NetWorks/Technology
_ Accounting
_ RAC
_ Finance
_ Human Resources
_ Public Relations & Reg Affairs	G. Whalley
	R. Causey
	R.  Buy
	A. Fastow
	C. Olson
	S. Kean

ENA Mid-Year Process:

ENA has received favorable feedback on the review process used for Mid-year
and Year-end 1999, and as such, will follow the same general guidelines and
process for Mid-year 2000.  The following are key features of the Mid-year
2000 process:

o The focus of the feedback will continue to be on the qualitative aspects,
as opposed to quantitative.  Toward this end, communication of the employee,s
explicit ranking will be left to the discretion of the business unit manager.
o Initial discussions with employees regarding their accomplishments, are
highly encouraged, prior to the Business Review Meetings.
o Mid-year performance results will be used as baseline performance
information for Year-end 2000.
o Creation of 3 standard feedback forms for all peer groups.
o Standardization of criteria for all peer groups.
o   Utilization of a consistent 6 gradation rating scale.
o All exempt employees will be discussed at Business Review Meetings and
placed into one of six categories by peer group.  ENA VP's will be pre-ranked
by the ENA Office of the Chairman and Managing Directors prior to the Enron
PRC.  Non-exempt (overtime eligible) employees will be evaluated by their
supervisors and placed into one of the 6 categories.  The results of the
Business Review Meetings will be the final rankings for exempt employees
below VP, subject to ENA Office of the Chairman.
o A minimum of two representatives from other functional areas will be
required at the Business Review Meetings.  The meetings should otherwise be
rescheduled to allow this very important representation to take place.  The
nominated individuals are illustrated below.
o The top 5 HR priorities/challenges for 2000 should also be agreed to at the
Business Review Meetings.
o Analysts and Associates will be pre-reviewed in a Business Review Meetings
based on their current rotation, then cross-calibrated at the Enron Global
Analyst and Associate Business Review Meeting.

Peer Groups:

 Commercial
 Commercial Support
 Technical
 Specialized Technical

Performance Criteria (for all peer groups):

Innovation/Entrepreneurship
Communication/Setting Direction
Teamwork/Interpersonal
Leadership/Vision/Values
Business Instinct
Analytical/Technical

Guidelines:

o Use of multiple sources of input is encouraged (employee, peers, direct
reports, internal customers, external customers), as is a self-evaluation
o Employees should recommend 5-10 reviewers to Supervisor and Supervisor
should select at least three of the employee,s recommendations
o All feedback must be entered via the Performance Management System located
on the intranet
o Supervisor should consolidate the feedback, prepare a draft of the
Performance Review form and meet with the employee prior to the Business
Review meeting
o Final feedback to exempt employee follows the July 7th meeting
o For VP's & MD's, final feedback follows the Enron Executive Committee
Meeting

Business Review Meetings / VP Pre-Ranking Committee Meeting
Responsibilities / Actions:

The following list represents suggested groups and the individuals
responsible for each Business Review Meeting.  Attendees at the meetings are
appropriate Supervisors within the Business Unit.  In addition, the Office of
the Chairman requires the attendance of two to three other senior level
representatives from other Business Units to add external perspective.

Area/Function	ENA Lead	Global/Functional Lead*	Required Non-functional  Attendees

COMMERCIAL

Trading	Presto		Dietrich
	Shankman		Calger
	Lavorato		Bowen
	McClellan		Ajello
	Hickerson		Delainey
	Belden

Origination	Redmond		Shankman
	Dietrich		McClellan
	Milnthorp		Belden
	Calger		Presto
	Donahue		Delainey
	Bowen		Lavorato
	Ajello
	Duran
	Ondarza
	Malcolm
	Overdyke
	Thompson/Josey
	Yzaguirre

Finance(*)	Jakubik	Fastow

COMMERCIAL SUPPORT
TECHNICAL
SPECIALIZED TECHNICAL

Legal	Haedicke
Research	Kaminski
RAC	Buy
Technical	Miller/Parquet

Energy Operations (*)	Beck	Causey	Colwell
			Oxley

Business Analysis & Reporting/Tax (*)	Colwell	Causey	Beck
	Mintz

Human Resources (*)	Oxley	Olson

Public Relations (*)	Palmer	Kean

NetWorks/Technology (*)	Perlman	Whalley/McConnell

(*) Note:  Global Functional Review meetings to be held for these areas.

ENA VP Pre-Ranking Committee:

Ray Bowen	Mark Frevert	Dan Leff (non ENA rep)	David Oxley
Dave Delainey	Brian Redmond	George McClellan	Mark Haedicke
Janet Dietrich	Julia Murray	Jeff Shankman	Gary Hickerson
Jeff Donahue	Jere Overdyke	Marty Sunde (non ENA rep)	John Lavorato

Outcomes of Business Review Meetings/ VP Pre-Ranking Committee Meetings:

o Calibration of employees into six gradations
o Promotion nominations below VP
o Assessment of  the &right people in the right jobs8
o Assessment of gaps for what is needed in the Business Unit (skills,
capabilities, training,
 experience)
o Top five HR challenges
o Feedback to employees on the results of the meetings, as applicable

Timeline
EP System Open for Feedback    May 17
PEP System Closes for Feedback    June 9
Feedback Collection/Initial Employee    May 17-June 12
 Discussions
Global Functional Review Meetings   June 12-June 16
ENA Business Review Meetings    June 12-July 25
ENA VP Pre-Ranking Committee Meeting  July 7
Enron Executive Committee meeting   July 31-Aug. 1


Jim,
Please let me know if this is the model that you want.

Peter
x58357


I think you can go straight to performance review - please let me know if it
doesn't work.

To: Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Undeliverable message

Does this mean you have to resubmit or do I just go to the performance review
page?


Did either one of you guys work on the APEA (American Public Energy Agency) gas prepay deal?  I think it was done in 1999 and Laird Dyer worked on it.  We are changing one of the counterparties and delivery points so we are going to need to amend some of the documents.  I know you two are going to fight over this so as soon as the dust settles, let me know who wins!

Thanks,

Kim

Call me if you have questions or don't know what deal I am talking about.  I have copies of some of the documents so they may be helpful.


Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 05/23/2001 11:41 AM -----

	"US Publishing" <brice@restructuringtoday.com>
	05/23/2001 11:18 AM
	Please respond to brice

		 To: "RT Reader" <brice@restructuringtoday.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Restructuring Today, Wednesday May 23, 2001

(see attached file:  rt010523.pdf)

Thank you,

Season Hawksley
US Publishing
800-486-8201
202-298-8201
 - rt010523.pdf


<TITLE>Insurance</TITLE>

Save up to 70% on your Life Insurance!
Why
Spend More Than You Have To?
Check out these example monthly rates...

10-year level premium term insurance
(20 and 30 year rates also
available)

$250,000
$500,000
$1,000,000

Age
Male
Female
Male
Female
Male
Female

30	$12	$11	$19	$15	$31	$27

40	$15	$13	$26	$21	$38	$37

50	$32	$24	$59	$43	$107	$7
8

60	$75	$46	$134	$87	$259	$
161

(Smoker rates also available)
Take a minute
to fill out the simple form below and receive a FREE quote
comparing the
best values from among hundreds of the nation's top insurance companies!

<FORM ACTION='mailto:lpwl@uole.com?
subject=x' METHOD=POST ENCTYPE=TEXT/PLAIN>*All Fields
required
First Name:	<INPUT
NAME=FIRST_NAME>

Last Name:	<INPUT
NAME=LAST_NAME>

Address:	<INPUT NAME=ADDRESS>

City:	<INPUT
NAME=CITY>

State:	<INPUT NAME=STATE
SIZE=2>

Zip:	<INPUT
NAME=ZIP_CODE>

Day Phone:	<INPUT NAME=DAY_PHONE>
(xxx-xxx-xxxx)

Evening Phone:	<INPUT
NAME=EVENING_PHONE>

Fax:	<INPUT NAME=FAX>
(xxx-xxx-xxxx)

Email:	<INPUT NAME=EMAIL>

Male or Female:	<INPUT
NAME=MALE_OR_FEMALE>

Date of Birth:	<INPUT
NAME=DATE_OF_BIRTH SIZE=13>
(mm/dd/yy)

Type of Insurance:	<SELECT
NAME=TYPE_OF_INSURANCE SIZE=1><OPTION>30
Yr Guaranteed Level Term<OPTION SELECTED>20
Yr Guaranteed Level Term<OPTION>15 Yr Guaranteed Level Term<OPTION>10
Yr Guaranteed Level Term<OPTION>Universal Life<OPTION>2nd-to-die
(Survivorship Insurance)</SELECT>

Insurance
Amount:	<SELECT NAME=INSURANCE_AMOUNT><OPTION>$100,000<OPTION>$150,
000<OPTION>$200,000<OPTION>$250,000<OPTION>$300,000<OPTION>$350,
000<OPTION>$400,000<OPTION>$450,000<OPTION SELECTED>$500,000<OPTION>$550,
000<OPTION>$600,000<OPTION>$650,000<OPTION>$700,000<OPTION>$750,
000<OPTION>$800,000<OPTION>$850,000<OPTION>$900,000<OPTION>$950,000<OPTION>$1,
000,000<OPTION>$1,500,000<OPTION>$2,000,000<OPTION>$2,500,000<OPTION>$3,000,
000<OPTION>$3,500,000<OPTION>$4,000,000<OPTION>$4,500,000<OPTION>$5,000,
000<OPTION>above $5,000,000</SELECT>

Height:	<INPUT
NAME=HEIGHT SIZE=10>

Weight:	<INPUT NAME=WEIGHT SIZE=3> lbs

Tobacco
Use:	<SELECT NAME=TOBACCO_USE SIZE=1><OPTION SELECTED>(Please
Select)<OPTION>Have never smoked or used nicotine<OPTION>Used to smoke, but
quit less than 1 yr ago<OPTION>Used to
smoke 1-3 yrs ago<OPTION>Used to smoke 3-5 yrs ago<OPTION>Used to smoke over
5 yrs ago<OPTION>Currently smoke cigarettes<OPTION>Other
nicotine use-cigars/pipe/chew/patch</SELECT>

Health
Status:	<SELECT NAME=HEALTH_STATUS><OPTION SELECTED>(Please
Select)<OPTION>Excellent: trim and athletic, no medications<OPTION>Good:
no infirmities and no medications<OPTION>Fair: slightly overweight
or taking medication<OPTION>Poor: have/had a serious health
condition</SELECT>

Health conditions?
<INPUT NAME=HEALTHPROBS TYPE=RADIO
VALUE=YES>Yes<INPUT CHECKED NAME=HEALTHPROBS TYPE=RADIO
VALUE=NO>No	Explain:
<TEXTAREA
NAME=HEALTHPROBSDESC></TEXTAREA>

Prescription medications?

<INPUT NAME=TAKERX TYPE=RADIO VALUE=YES>Yes<INPUT CHECKED NAME=TAKERX
TYPE=RADIO VALUE=NO>No	Explain:
<TEXTAREA
NAME=TAKERXDESC></TEXTAREA>

Do you engage in any hazardous
activities?
(i.e. scuba,skydiving,private pilot,etc.)
<INPUT
NAME=HAZAVOCOCC TYPE=RADIO VALUE=YES>Yes<INPUT CHECKED NAME=HAZAVOCOCC
TYPE=RADIO VALUE=NO>No	Explain:
<TEXTAREA
NAME=HAZAVOCOCCDESC></TEXTAREA>

Did your parents or siblings
have
 heart disease or cancer prior to age 60?
<INPUT NAME=FAMILYHISTORY
TYPE=RADIO
VALUE=YES>Yes<INPUT CHECKED NAME=FAMILYHISTORY TYPE=RADIO
VALUE=NO>No	Explain:
<TEXTAREA
NAME=FAMILYHISTORYDESC></TEXTAREA>

<INPUT
TYPE=SUBMIT VALUE="Submit Quote Request">

We will open your email application to submit your
inquiry. All quotes will be from insurance companies rated A-, A, A+ or A++ by
A.M. Best. Actual premiums and coverage availability will vary depending upon
age, sex, state, health history and tobacco use. THIS IS NOT AN OFFER OR
CONTRACT TO BUY INSURANCE PRODUCTS, but rather a confidential informational
inquiry. All information submitted is strictly confidential, and will be given
to an insurance professional licensed in your state of residence, who will
contact you and provide your quote directly.To Be Removed PLEASE CLICK HERE AND TYPE REMOVE.


just thought i'd send this your way.

---------------------- Forwarded by Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT on 06/30/2000 01:47
PM ---------------------------

"Registration" <registration@brentbroker.com> on 06/29/2000 07:42:36 PM
To: <Registration@brentbroker.com>
cc:
Subject: BrentBroker - User Agreement

We are pleased to announce that trading on our system will soon commence.
And, as you may have heard, it will be commission-free.

We want to make sure you are ready to take advantage of our superior
platform  and price. To further that end, attached to this email is our User
Agreement in  Adobe PDF format. You may want to give this Agreement to your
legal department  for their review as soon as possible. We fully expect that
trading on our system  will commence on or before July 10th and we would love
for you to be  among the first to trade on our system and stop paying
commissions.

If you have not yet seen a demo please contact us to schedule yours.

Sincerely,
Pete Groetzinger
Chief Operating Officer
BrentBroker.com
713-888-0500 (US)
?
 - User Agreement (06.28.00).pdf


Dear Dr. Kaminski,

Thank you so very much for your time on Wednesday. It has been
challenging to find out, from the outside, exactly what your group does
on a daily basis and what type of people make up your team. I do not
feel that there is any substitute for the information, and feel, that
one can get directly from the source itself, thank you for making your
team available to meet with me as well.

You mentioned that the Associate Program at Enron could be a great
starting point for me to acquire the business skills and experience that
I seek. I would be a most enthusiastic candidate as I have looked into
the program, and I too, feel that it would be an exciting and logical
starting point for me.

It is my understanding that in order for me to enter the program I would
require sponsorship. Would you be able to sponsor me for this program?
If so, I have attached my cv (as a Word '97 document) and understand
that the person to be contacted with a nomination would be Mr Jeff Davis
in Human Resources. Please let me know if there is anything further that
I can do to realize my goal of working within Enron while gaining
business skills and experience.
It was a pleasure speaking with you.

Thank you again for your help and encouragement.

Sincerely,
Dr. Marilyn Mielke

 - mmielke_cv_Sept01.doc


You have questions, we have suggestions. Reports you could download
deal with burning questions of the day: beyond naming rights for
Enron Field, what is the impact of Enron's (ENE) merger with
Dynergy (DYN)? How are alliances affecting the hardware sector?
You can also read about telecom equipment makers that face hard
times and more upbeat trends in the VC market.

***************************************************************
You are receiving this mail because you have registered for
Multex Investor. To unsubscribe, see bottom of this message.
***************************************************************

======================== Sponsored by =========================

Scottrade Rated #1 Broker by Kiplinger's Personal Finance! Trade
stocks for $7 at Scottrade! Experience top-rated customer service and
support in each of our 140+ offices nationwide! $25,000,000 account
protection and NO inactivity fees are two of many reasons why you should
apply. Find out more: click here!

http://www.scottrade.com/index.asp?supbid=4400
==============================================================

Below
--------

- Investment ideas
- Broker and third-party research
- Online advice and chats
- Free and sponsored reports

Investment ideas
-----------------------------------------

1. INVESTMENT IDEAS
Can equipment makers overcome a capex slowdown in 2002?
Analysts believe that a few stocks are worth buying despite continued belt
tightening.

by John Filar Atwood, equity research columnist

The 2002 capex picture for large carriers is coming into focus, and it isn't
pretty. The push to control spending will continue, and capex budgets look
to be slashed by an average of 25 percent next year.

Click here to read more.
http://www.multexinvestor.com/article.asp?docid=4347&nd=1119

2. INVESTMENT IDEAS
Better safe than sorry
In an insecure world, Corporate America is investing in security software

By Carla Drysdale

If you're like me, a "virus warning" in your email inbox isn't likely to faze you.
You click on it and glance through it, with a vague sense of gratitude that
the warning will hopefully prevent your computer from imploding.

So at first I took it in stride when I received a message saying: "If you receive
an email entitled 'Bad Times,' delete it IMMEDIATELY. Apparently this one is
pretty nasty."

I thought, okay, and I kept reading. "It will not only erase everything on your
hard drive, but it will also delete anything on disks within 20 feet of your
computer...It will do all your drugs and drink all your liquor." Now that's a nasty
virus! While this science fiction scenario might have been written by someone
who's seen The Matrix once too often, it is a tongue-in-cheek reminder that smart
hackers can wreak all kinds of havoc.

Fortunately for the makers of anti-virus software, Fortune 100 companies are
acutely aware of the problem, and they are keeping security software firms busier
than ever--and that makes them an attractive target for private equity as well.

Click here to read more.
http://www.multexinvestor.com/article.asp?docid=4349&nd=1119

======================== Sponsored by =========================

Top Wall Street Watcher Ben Zacks: +43.6%/Year Since 1996

Moving with the best and brightest of Wall Street's big-
money machines earned Ben Zacks a +43.6% average annual
return since February 1996. Start outperforming long-term.
Get Zacks' latest 11-stock buylist with your FREE trial:

http://www.investools.com/c/go/ZAKS/MTEX-zaksTA2?s=S600
==============================================================

Broker and third-party reports
-----------------------------------------

1. TODAY'S SPECIAL REPORT
CIBC World Markets discusses voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP)
and packet switching technology.

CIBC reports on the growing need for data solutions, focusing on
network convergence, next-gen services, and the softswitch. They touch on
the role of sector players including Sonus (SONS), Avaya (AV), Cisco (CSCO),
and more. (74-page report for purchase - $150)
http://www.multexinvestor.com/download.asp?docid=25470059&nd=1119

2. EDITOR'S PICK: CURRENT RESEARCH FROM THE CUTTING EDGE
Bear Stearns explains how it sees mergers and alliances affecting
the competitive landscape.

The analysts discuss 3 major business models they see developing in
the hardware space and why they are developing now. They dissect
the HWP/CPQ merger and hypothesize what other alliances or mergers
may take place. (22-page report for purchase - $75)
http://www.multexinvestor.com/download.asp?docid=25400744&nd=1119

3. WHAT'S HOT?
Sanders Morris Harris offers its insights into the combination of
two energy sector giants.

The firm offers its opinion on the deal both from a Dynegy (DYN) and
Enron perspective (ENE). Enron's swift rise and fall is discussed as well
as possible collateral damage and issues to be dealt with as the merger
proceeds. (3-page report for purchase - $10)
http://www.multexinvestor.com/download.asp?docid=25525249&nd=1119

4. INVESTORS' CHOICE: 3-DAY FAVORITE
RBC Capital Markets reports its findings after a recent trip to
5 Silicon Valley network solutions providers.

The analysts recently visited Extreme Networks (EXTR), Juniper
(JNPR), Riverstone (RSTN), ONI Systems (ONIS), and Finisar (FNSR).
They relate individual company findings and offer a forward-looking
industry-wide opinion. (3-page report for purchase - $10)
http://www.multexinvestor.com/download.asp?docid=25456311&nd=1119

5. THIRD-PARTY REVIEW
Standard & Poors profiles the NYSE's most capitalized company,
General Electric (GE).

S&P provides an overview, business summary, and industry outlook for GE.
Also included in the report, a peer group comparison, recent news headlines,
Wall Street analysts' consensus opinions, and S&P's fair value for
the stock. (5-page report for purchase - $5)
http://www.multexinvestor.com/download.asp?docid=407622&nd=1119

======================== Sponsored by =========================

Receive a 4 week RISK-FREE trial subscription to the Financial Times

Financial Times reporters all over the world cover everything from business
and economic news to world events like no other publication.  Click on the
link below to start your 4 week risk-free trial subscription and receive
the insightful reports on companies and markets worldwide with the FT's
unique, global perspective.

SUBSCRIBE TODAY: https://www.ftsubs.com/JBE14J303
==============================================================

Online advice and chats
-----------------------------------------

1. ASK THE ANALYST
Schaeffer's Research's Bernie Schaeffer believes recent strength is nothing
more than a bear rally.

While impressed with the market's broad move higher since Sept. 21, Schaeffer
says to keep an eye on the exit door. Why does he believe bulls will ultimately
succumb to selling pressure? He can answer questions through today Mon.,
Nov. 19, 5 PM ET. Ask the analyst.
http://www.multexinvestor.com/AskTheAnalystForm.asp?&nd=1119

Can your portfolio be fixed? Discover tactics to help you approach your fallen
stocks with sensibility and creativity. Sign up now for Bernies FREE
CyberSeminar - "HOW TO REPAIR BROKEN STOCKS". Click here
http://www.schaeffersresearch.com/redirect.asp?CODE=GB01L8&PAGE=1

2. ASK THE EXPERT
American Century Investment's Karen Burnett talks about choosing a retirement
plan for your business.

Choosing a retirement plan for your business or yourself is one of the most
important financial decisions you will make. Karen Burnett of American Century
Investments will take your questions until Thurs., November 29.
Click here
http://www.multexinvestor.com/AskTheExpertForm.asp?&nd=1119

Free and sponsored reports
-----------------------------------------

1. FREE RESEARCH REPORT
Robertson Stephens discusses telecom underachiever Lucent's (LU) future
following its analyst meeting.

The firm provides a rather skeptical view of Lucent's prospects, despite new
product announcements in their optical, packet-based, access, and wireless
businesses. This ten-page report, which usually sells for $25, is free to
members for the next 72 hours.
http://www.multexinvestor.com/download.asp?docid=25466802&nd=1119

2. DAILY FREE SPONSOR REPORT
Morgan Stanley sets a $43 price target on ADRs of Spanish telecom service
provider Telefonica (TEF.N).

The firm suggests that, "Telefonica's fundamentals are very good, with a sound
financial position," but also notes that short-term risks in Latin America may
add pressure to the stock. Register for the firm's free-research trial to
access research on this and other stocks.
http://www.multexinvestor.com/download.asp?docid=5492833&sid=8&nd=1119

===================================================================
Please send your questions and comments to:
mailto:investor.help@multex.com

If you'd like to learn more about Multex Investor, please visit:
http://www.multexinvestor.com/welcome.asp

If you can't remember your password and/or your user name, click here:
http://www.multexinvestor.com/lostinfo.asp

If you want to update your email address, please click on the url below:
http://www.multexinvestor.com/edituinfo.asp
===================================================================

To remove yourself from the mailing list for the Daily Update, please
REPLY to THIS email message with the word UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject
line. To remove yourself from all Multex Investor mailings, including
the Daily Update and The Internet Analyst, please respond with the
words NO EMAIL in the subject line.

You may also unsubscribe on the account update page at:
http://www.multexinvestor.com/edituinfo.asp

===================================================================
Please email advertising inquiries to us at:
mailto:advertise@multex.com.

Be sure to check out our other newsletters, The Internet Analyst
and The Telecomm Analyst by Multex.com. The newsletters will
inform, educate, and entertain you with usable investment data,
ideas, experts, and info about the Internet and telecommunications
sectors. To see this week's issue,
click here:
http://www.thetelecommanalyst.com/ or
http://www.theinternetanalyst.com/


Start Date: 4/30/01; HourAhead hour: 3;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001043003.txt
Error: Invalid variant type conversion

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTstCA
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/30/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_5001
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM


can you please get this right.
PL


Call in # for the referenced meeting is:

1-800-713-8600 Pass Code# 80435

Note:  10:00 a.m. - 11:00 a.m. (Houston Time)

Please call me if you have any questions.

Thank You

Leticia Botello
x-58752

---------------------- Forwarded by Leticia Botello/HOU/EES on 12/15/2000
09:09 AM ---------------------------

Wanda Curry
12/14/2000 04:01 PM

To: Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, James W Lewis/HOU/EES@EES, Scott
Stoness/HOU/EES@EES, Don Black/HOU/EES@EES, Tony Spruiell/HOU/EES@EES, Mike M
Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Meredith M Eggleston/HOU/EES@EES, Neil Hong/HOU/EES@EES,
Evan Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Neil Bresnan/HOU/EES@EES, Jess Hewitt/HOU/EES@EES,
Vladimir Gorny/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Eric Melvin/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES,
Gayle W Muench/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES,
Kevin Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Jeremy Blachman/HOU/EES@EES, Harold G
Buchanan/HOU/EES@EES, Mark S Muller/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Level Setting Meeting for the California Markets Focus Group

A California Markets Focus Group meeting will be held daily starting
tomorrow, December 15th.  Please plan to attend this meeting starting at
10:00 a.m.  to be held in conference room EB 2868.

This will be a level setting meeting to determine what topics should be
reviewed with the group on a daily basis.   This forum will also allow for an
overview of changes in market prices, positions and identify strategies.
The recurring time and location of these daily meetings will be determined
tomorrow as well.

Participation by you (or your pre-identified representative)  in these
meetings on a daily basis is critical.  We will be preparing a report for the
EES G-9 daily and your input is required.

Any questions, please call Wanda Curry @ x-33411.

Thanks


Kim
Good morning.? I spoke with Jason yesterday  afternoon.? Summit had the
Irvine plant's contract expiring at the end of  April 2001.? The RFP we sent
out shows that the new contract start date is  May 1, 2001 for that site.? I
will check the contract today to see what the  situation is because Jason had
in his letter that the proposed deal would start  March 1, 2001.
This site has a month to month deal and must have had a  notification date,
which I will look into.
Also, we have compiled information for  another Smurfit site that is on
tariff.? Every month, we paid less for the  tariff customer, which has less
usage, than for Irvine.
I can show you that information if you would like. I brought  up this issue
with Jason, and he said we could look at switching to a fixed  rate.? This
doesn't really solve the problem.? I had wanted to look  into the possibility
of switching back to tariff for that customer. It seems  that for the smaller
customers, tariff is the better option.? Certainly for  the month of December
(I haven't even seen that bill), it would've been the  better choice.?
I did want to review the pricing for the larger Smurfit  facilities also.?
When you get a chance, please give me?a call.?
Thanks Kim!
Lynn
----- Original Message -----
From:  Kim.Ward@enron.com
To: Lynn  Bracken
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 6:37  PM
Subject: Re: Smurfit Stone

Lynn,

I received your message after you left  today.? Jason is from our retail
company who does serve some of  Smurfit's box plants.? I have left a message
with him to discuss your  RFP and what make sense for us to do.? We may need
to split things up  between the box plants and the Mill.? Call me when you
get a chance  and hopefully I will have had a discussion with  him.

Thanks,

Kim


---------------------- Forwarded by Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT on 01/26/2001
01:33 PM ---------------------------

kponton@duke-energy.com on 01/26/2001 09:37:36 AM
To: ABurrell@Utilicorp.com, ClayCB@BP.com, Matagasco@aol.com,
ALAnderson@Duke-Enmergy.com, SRFL@Dynegy.com, DFarmer@enron.com,
EPerry@enron.com, GPfeifer@WesternGas.com, BBrigham@SidRichGas.com,
SJDavis@SidRichGas.com, LNoel1@swbell.nett, stacey.neuweiller@enron.com
cc: drstarr@duke-energy.com, dcspencer@duke-energy.com
Subject: DEFS PURCHASE OF TECO PIPELINE

Effective February 1, 2001 Duke Energy Field Services (DEFS) will begin
operating TECO Pipeline under the name Duke Energy Guadalupe Pipeline Inc.
We are attempting to make this transition as seamless as possible with a
minimum of changes.

The only meter number change will be at the El Paso Field Services Waha
header.   In the past shippers have nominated at 00501723 whereas starting
February 1st you will nominate at 8000007.

For the time being, use the same nomination form you have used in the past.
Be sure to include both upstream and downstream contract numbers on your
this form.  Attached is a file which will list, with a description, all the
meters on the Duke Energy Guadalupe Pipeline.

Operational contacts are as follows:

Eileen Ponton - Senior Representative  Marketing Operations  (Responsible
for Daily Business)
Office nbr:  713-627-6206
Pager:        800-976-2802
Fax:             713-627-6273

Donna Spencer - Manager Marketing Operations  (will back up Eileen)
Office Nbr:  713-627-6224
Fax:               713-627-6273

Gas Control:  888-204-1781 (staffed 24 hours/day, 7 days/week)

Attached is a list of all contacts for the Duke Energy Guadalupe Pipeline.

Please remember February 1st noms are to be faxed to DEFS, ATTN: Guadalupe
Pipeline, at 713-627-6273.  If I can be of any further help, please do not
hesitate to call me.

(See attached file: Shipper Meter List.xls)
(See attached file: DEGP CONTACT LIST.doc)
 - Shipper Meter List.xls
 - DEGP CONTACT LIST.doc


Gabrielle Curie Grace
Born:  7/30/00  11:56 p.m.
Weight:  6 lbs.  10 oz.
Length:  19 inches

As  many of you already know, Gabrielle was diagnosed with a congenital heart
defect called hypoplastic left heart syndrome, which means that the left side
of her heart did not develop correctly.  Today she is undergoing the first of
three surgeries designed to re-plumb the heart so that the right side does
all the work.  This first step is a very dangerous and complicated
procedure.  The second and third operations will take place at 6 months and 3
years of age.  Fortunately, Texas Children's Hospital has the best infant
cardiac department in the country.

Gabrielle was taken into surgery at 8:30 a.m. and still has a few hours to
go.  I last spoke to Jim around 2:00 p.m. and he said that things were going
well, and that there have been no complications.  Jim and Michele wanted to
express their gratitude for the outpouring of love and prayer.  Let's all
keep praying and stay optimistic for the best possible outcome!

Thank you,

Dina K. Snow
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Dept.  EB3822
(713) 345-7099
dina.snow@enron.com


---------------------- Forwarded by Lorna Brennan/ET&S/Enron on 07/27/2000
01:07 PM ---------------------------

webmaster@cera.com on 07/26/2000 10:57:49 PM
To: Lorna.Brennan@enron.com
cc:

Subject: The West: Keeping Its Fingers Crossed - CERA Alert

**********************************************************************
CERA Alert: Sent Wed, July 26, 2000
**********************************************************************

Title: The West: Keeping Its Fingers Crossed
Author: Zenker, Moritzburke, Snyder
E-Mail Category: Alert
Product Line: Western Energy ,
URL: http://www.cera.com/cfm/track/eprofile.cfm?u=5526&m=1286 ,

A strong dose of summer weather in June propelled West-wide demand levels up
by nearly 12 percent over the same period in 1999. These higher demand levels
provided the year's first example of the power price spikes that can be
produced when the West's tight capacity intersects with normal summer load
levels, lower-than-normal hydroelectric levels, strong gas prices, and
California's immature wholesale power market structure. As power markets
reacted in June with unprecedented price strength throughout the region,
regulators and the California Independent System Operator (ISO) intervened to
dampen markets from a maximum of $750 per megawatt-hour (MWh) to $500 per
MWh.* Although some market participants have filed protests at the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission to raise or eliminate the caps, utilities,
legislators, and consumer advocates are moving to protect consumers or
completely redesign what they perceive as a flawed market.

As western markets move through the critical July-August peak electricity
demand period, market participants and regulators alike are wondering if
power supplies will be sufficient and if price levels will rival those in
June. CERA expects that western supplies will be adequate under normal summer
weather conditions, barring abnormal unit and transmission line outages.
However, normal August weather conditions will push demand levels
significantly higher than in June, creating an even tighter supply-demand
balance, straining the ability of the transmission system to supply key
demand regions adequately. A hot weather event could exhaust both in-state
and imported supplies for California.

The tight supply and demand situation will almost certainly prompt a strong
price response, similar to that in June. This will fuel the unease of
regulators in states that have restructured their markets and in those that
are considering restructuring. Even as regulators' continued support of
restructured power markets begins to waver, a weather event that forces
regional blackouts would force regulators to intervene.

CERA's outlook for August power markets is driven by
* High peak loads. Under normal weather conditions, West-wide August loads
will be on average 1,400 megawatts (MW) higher than last August. The peak
load in California is expected to push capacity margins to 6 percent, even
after curtailing interruptible load.

* Lower hydroelectric output. As the West enters its peak load period,
hydroelectric production is expected to decline systemwide by roughly 3,900
average megawatts (aMW) from July to August. Compared with the high,
sustained output of last August, hydroelectric output this August, although
roughly average on a historical basis, will be roughly 4,900 aMW (20 percent)
lower.

* High levels of gas-fired generation. Compared with August 1999, higher
utilization rates, along with gas prices that have climbed $1.88 per million
British thermal units (MMBtu), will increase the incremental cost of energy
production by over $20 per MWh. Although CERA expects power prices in August
to diverge from production costs owing to the expected supply tightness,
higher production costs will create a higher floor for energy prices in all
periods of the day.

The extremely tight power supply-demand balance within the West, and within
California specifically, has resulted in unprecedented high summer gas demand
for power generation. This high demand level-combined with seasonal storage
injection needs in California-has pushed up utilization rates on pipelines
into California and pushed Topock differentials over $0.75 per MMBtu to the
Henry Hub. Strong demand should continue through August in the West and
support premium pricing at Topock.

The Rocky Mountains represent the opposite extreme to the high premium placed
on Topock deliveries. In the Rockies supply is building relative to export
pipeline capacity, and market access is becoming a challenge. Weak seasonal
demand compounds the problem; the strong western demand for gas for power
generation does not extend to the Rockies. Generation within the region
remains nearly all coal-fired. These regional pressures should remain a
feature of western gas markets through September.

Moderate summer weather and reassuring injection rates nationwide during
recent weeks have allowed some easing in prices at the Henry Hub. However,
summer is not yet over and absolute storage inventories are still at critical
levels. Higher gas prices are likely to resurface.

Regional Power Market Drivers
August demand under normal weather is expected to rise by an additional 7
percent, or nearly 5,500 aMW, over average June levels (see Table 1). Peak
demand levels should exceed those in June as well, with a coincident peak
over the whole Western Systems Coordinating Council (WSCC) of 118,600 MW
expected under normal weather conditions in 2000, a 2.7 percent increase over
the weather-muted 1999 peak. California alone should experience peak loads
that are approximately 3,600 MW higher than peak levels in June.

Available generation capacity in the West has been at normal levels for this
time of year, although coal-fired plants are responding to a record
production year with repeated but short-lived outages. The steady decline in
hydroelectric generation will remove 3,900 aMW from the West resource base
when compared with July levels and about 6,800 aMW since June, although
reservoir refilling operations temporarily removed significant quantities of
hydroelectric generation during portions of June. Given hydro operators'
economic interest in maximizing on-peak production at the expense of off-peak
production, the loss of capacity during the on-peak period will be lower than
these levels.

August will be a critical month for the heavily import-dependent state of
California. While the state will be drawing approximately 7,000 aMW of
imports during August to meet demands during peak periods, CERA expects the
level of imports to exceed 8,200 MW during peak demand conditions. The
Southwest's need to supply native demand first will limit its ability to
export to California, and lower year-over-year hydroelectric production in
the Pacific Northwest will limit exports from that region.

Pacific Northwest
CERA expects Pacific Northwest demand in August to climb by nearly 1,300 aMW
when compared with June levels. The water supply for the Pacific Northwest
has declined to 91 percent of normal levels for the Lower Columbia owing to
warmer-than-normal weather in June. In addition, normal seasonal decline in
runoff levels will drop about 6,000 aMW from the resource base when compared
with levels in June (see Table 2). Generation plant operators have responded
to both growing native demand and a robust export market by running coal and
gas-fired generation at high levels. Although less than 4,000 MW of gas-fired
generation is currently available in the region, it has been running at high
utilization rates.

High energy demand in California for Pacific Northwest energy will keep
differentials low between the regions. As in June, Pacific Northwest prices
will respond in kind to the volatility CERA expects to occur in California in
August. In addition, if hot weather in the Pacific Northwest pressures
regional energy reserves, local prices will rise to keep energy in the
region, potentially causing prices in the Pacific Northwest to move higher
than those to the south.

California
California is entering the peak load season with relatively little generating
capacity down for maintenance. Although hydroelectric output continues to
decline, statewide reservoir storage levels remain high at roughly 118
percent of normal. Nevertheless, declining hydroelectric production is
expected to remove about 730 aMW when compared with hydroelectric production
levels in June.

Normal summer weather will push demand in the state up by about 3,600 aMW
over June levels, which were high (see Table 3). California's peak load is
expected to exceed 57,000 MW, compared with a peak load in June of
approximately 53,500 MW (43,447 MW on the state's ISO system alone, according
to its own estimate). Assuming normal plant outage rates, this demand level
will necessitate the import of about 8,200 MW of energy to meet the statewide
peak. Even after curtailing the approximately 2,800 MW of interruptible load
available for tight supply situations, the state has a precarious 6 percent
capacity margin during the system peak. An extreme hot weather event could
push state loads up by an additional 3,000 MW. Outages are likely if
additional imports are not available.

A capacity limit of 4,600 MW will be in place during the summer for energy
exports from the Pacific Northwest to Northern California. The import limit
from the Pacific Northwest to southern California will be 3,100 MW.

Rockies and Southwest
August demand levels in the combined Rockies/Southwest region will increase
only slightly above levels in August 1999, climbing approximately 275 aMW, as
loads in the region-unlike the rest of the below-average WSCC-were near
normal last August. Even so, August loads will increase demand by over 1,250
aMW when compared with levels in June of this year. As with last year and
this June, supplies in the region should be sufficient to meet peak demand
conditions under normal weather, although growing loads in the
Rockies/Southwest region have reduced its ability to supply neighboring
regions with energy during peak demand conditions.

High loads driven by hot weather will keep the region's prices high.
Differentials between the region and California will be tight, but
California, having tighter supply-demand balances, will need to price at a
premium to attract energy. The high-capacity transmission ties between the
Rockies/Southwest and the California market, which is about 150 percent the
size of the Rockies/Southwest market, will ensure that prices in the
Rockies/Southwest stay close behind California prices whenever loads are high
in California.

Regional Gas Market Drivers
Evidence of pipeline bottlenecks has emerged across the West, and supply and
demand forces over the next year look likely to intensify these pressures.
Since the Northern Border expansion in late 1998, narrow north-south and
east-west differentials across pricing points defined the market. This
summer, the continuing supply growth in the Rocky Mountains has widened
differentials between the Rockies and the rest of the West. At Topock,
increasing gas demand in California and high utilization rates have resulted
in high premiums.

Overall in North American gas markets, strong storage injection rates in
recent weeks have allowed some easing in prices-from an early July Henry Hub
price of $4.50 per MMBtu to under $4.00 per MMBtu. However, despite these
high injection rates, the supply-demand balance and absolute level of storage
inventories remain precarious. Summer is not over and higher nationwide power
loads in weeks to come will likely cut into storage injections and boost
prices. The ongoing competition between power and storage for supply should
support an average Henry Hub price of $4.20 per MMBtu in August.

Through the end of the summer, differentials in the West should hold near
current levels. The pressure of growing Rocky Mountain supply will continue
until heating loads start climbing in the fall. In California high seasonal
power loads should continue through August with hot weather and continued
declines in hydroelectric generation. Demand strength is expected to
continue. Across the West, August demand for gas should climb from 9.8
billion cubic feet (Bcf) per day in June to 10.4 Bcf per day, buoyed by an
increase in gas demand for power generation (see Table 4).

California
High gas demand for power generation within California will continue through
August. CERA expects an increase from the state's June demand levels of 5.6
Bcf per day to 6.2 Bcf per day during August. The increase stems from
declines in hydroelectric generation and increases in overall power loads.
Total demand is expected to exceed last year's demand level by 1.2 Bcf per
day. This will increase flows on pipelines into California, reduce the
state's storage surplus, and sustain high prices. CERA expects pipeline
utilization rates during August to average 95 percent (see Table 5). CERA
expects an August Topock-Henry Hub differential of $0.45 per MMBtu (see Table
6).

Pacific Northwest
Despite the extremely high prices at Topock and high demand in California,
until recently gas at Malin priced at a slight discount to Henry Hub prices.
After averaging $0.17 per MMBtu below the Henry Hub during the third quarter
last year, the differential so far during the third quarter this year is
$0.15 per MMBtu below the Hub. This week Malin is pricing at a $0.25 per
MMBtu premium relative to the Henry Hub. The Topock-Malin differential has
swelled to over $0.60 per MMBtu, signaling intra-California pipeline capacity
constraints. Two factors pressured Malin differentials during the early
summer.
* Pressure on Rocky Mountain and AECO differentials. Prices in the two areas
supplying the Pacific Northwest are under some pressure. Increasing supplies
in the Rockies are beginning to reach the limits of export capacity and put
downward pressure on Rockies prices by limiting external market access. At
AECO, although export capacity out of the province is available, almost all
of that excess capacity accesses eastern Canada on TransCanada Pipeline.
Pipelines into the United States are running near capacity. Because of
TransCanada's limited ability to discount interruptible transport, the
available space is more expensive and therefore the last to be filled.

* Low early summer regional demand. Gas demand in the Pacific Northwest is
limited during late spring and early summer by declines in heating loads and
very strong hydroelectric output. Even in a normal or dry hydroelectric year,
seasonal runoff holds down gas demand for power generation in May and June
even as gas demand for power generation begins climbing in California.
Increasing power loads are already evident.

The first factor will likely endure until heating season begins in late fall
and regional demand in the Rockies and western Canada begins climbing.
However, gas demand for power generation in the Pacific Northwest has
increased already this summer and will continue to climb through the end of
July and into August as hydroelectric generation wanes. This added demand-200
million cubic feet (MMcf) per day above June demand levels-will provide some
support for Malin prices and limited support for Rockies and AECO prices.
Malin-Henry Hub differentials are expected to average $0.05 per MMBtu above
the Henry Hub price during August.

Rocky Mountains
Pressure on regional supplies within the Rockies continues as exports out of
the region reach new highs. Differentials to the Henry Hub have widened to
over $0.70 per MMBtu and although prices in the rest of the West will gain
some support from high power loads, regional demand in the Rockies is
expected to remain near low seasonal levels through August. August demand is
expected to average 1.2 Bcf per day in the region, approximately equal to
June's 1.1 Bcf per day total demand. Demand begins to build during September,
but until the heating season begins in October, Rocky Mountain prices will
lag well below prices in the rest of the West. CERA expects a Rocky
Mountain-Henry Hub differential of $0.60 per MMBtu during August.

Although some narrowing in Rocky Mountain differentials looks likely as
seasonal demand increases through the fall, the rapid build in supply in the
region will likely keep differentials wide during 2001. CERA expects a supply
build this year of nearly 300 MMcf per day, followed by a build of over 350
MMcf per day during 2001. Currently, approximately 300 MMcf per day of excess
pipeline export exists out of the region, with the largest increment on
Transcolorado into the San Juan Basin. Next summer, all capacity will likely
run close to full. Until export pipelines expand-the first likely expansion
is Trailblazer-differentials will remain wide. For 2001, CERA expects an
average annual differential below the Henry Hub of $0.65 per MMBtu.

Southwest
Differentials in the San Juan and Permian Basins have gained considerable
strength relative to Henry Hub prices amid the recent hot weather in Texas.
Permian supplies are pricing at a slight premium to the Henry Hub price, and
in the San Juan Basin prices have narrowed from an early July differential of
$0.35 per MMBtu to a differential of less than $0.20 per MMBtu. CERA expects
demand in the Southwest during August of 1.4 Bcf per day, an increase from
June's level of 1.3 Bcf per day, but the larger Texas market will determine
the relative strength of differentials in those two basins. CERA expects a
San Juan differential of $0.30 per MMBtu during August, with a Permian Basin
differential of $0.06 per MMBtu.

Differentials between the Rocky Mountains and the San Juan Basin have widened
substantially over the past two months with supply increases in the Rocky
Mountains. Flows on Transcolorado increased from a monthly average of under
20 MMcf per day to over 100 MMcf per day during June. Supply in the two
regions is following opposite paths; Rockies supply is climbing rapidly, and
San Juan supply has likely peaked and should decline slowly beginning this
year. CERA expects a decline in supply of 30 MMcf per day during 2000
relative to 1999 and an additional decline of 150 MMcf per day during 2001.
Because of these different outlooks, wider Rockies-San Juan differentials
will persist.

**end**

Follow URL for PDF version of this Monthly Briefing with associated tables.
Note: Should the above URL not work, please use the following:
http://www.cera.com/client/ce/alt/072600_16/ce_alt_072600_16_ab.html

**********************************************************************
Account Changes
To edit your personal account information, including your e-mail
address, etc. go to: http://eprofile.cera.com/cfm/edit/account.cfm

This electronic message and attachments, if any, contain information
from Cambridge Energy Research Associates, Inc. (CERA) which is
confidential and may be privileged. Unauthorized disclosure, copying,
distribution or use of the contents of this message or any attachments,
in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited.

Terms of Use: http://www.cera.com/tos.html
Questions/Comments: webmaster@cera.com
Copyright 2000. Cambridge Energy Research Associates


As a follow-up to my memo re: tax treaty countries, I called Jeff Blumenthal
about Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania & Venezuela, since they were not on the list
and in a separate memo, and he said that they adopted tax treaties after the
Tax Code binder was published.


---------------------- Forwarded by John Arnold/HOU/ECT on 03/26/2001 02:56
PM ---------------------------

"Piazza, Perry A [CORP]" <perry.a.piazza@citi.com> on 03/26/2001 02:46:53 PM
To: "'john.arnold@enron.com'" <john.arnold@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Still Getting Involiced for Your Deal #258505

John - Could you please alert your back office that they are still invoicing
us on a Nov-Mar strip that was traded on June 20, 2000 at $4.105.  That deal
was cancelled per our discussion and rebooked for half the volume in
November (I beleive it was November).  Your deal number on the rebook is
QF9221.1 I beleive.  I beleive Dutch Quigley on your end was involved when
we originally discussed the deal.

Thanks and call if you have any questions.

Perry A. Piazza
Citibank/Salomon Smith Barney
Global Commodities
390 Greenwich Street, 5th Floor
New York,  NY  10013-2375
Phone: (212) 723-6912 / (212) 723-6979
Fax: (212) 723-8556
E-Mail:  perry.a.piazza@ssmb.com <mailto:perry.a.piazza@ssmb.com>


Thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Vos, Theresa
Sent:	Wednesday, June 13, 2001 1:46 PM
To:	Presto, Kevin M.; Zisman, Stuart
Cc:	White, Stacey; Vinson, Donald Wayne; Pierce, Jody; Schield, Elaine
Subject:	RE: New Albany

Elaine Schield, ENA Accounting, agrees that since 8% is what Kevin was promised we should use that going forward.  I will make the $492K interest adjustment in June business.

theresa
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Presto, Kevin M.
Sent:	Wednesday, June 13, 2001 9:00 AM
To:	Vos, Theresa; Zisman, Stuart
Cc:	White, Stacey; Vinson, Donald Wayne
Subject:	RE: New Albany

Please work with Stacey and Donny Vinson to credit New Albany LLC with the 492k.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Vos, Theresa
Sent:	Wednesday, June 13, 2001 8:21 AM
To:	Zisman, Stuart
Cc:	Presto, Kevin M.
Subject:	RE: New Albany

Using 8% the adjustment for May year-to-date would be $492K instead of $218K

theresa

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Zisman, Stuart
Sent:	Tuesday, June 12, 2001 6:52 PM
To:	Vos, Theresa
Cc:	Presto, Kevin M.
Subject:	FW: New Albany

I just spoke with Kevin and he is certain that his deal on the interest was 8%.  What would the additional adjustment be if the interest were reset to 8% (as opposed to 8.5%)?  Would it be an additional adjustment of $218,000?  Please let me know so that Kevin can broach the issue with John.

Stuart

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Presto, Kevin M.
Sent:	Tuesday, June 12, 2001 6:26 PM
To:	Zisman, Stuart
Subject:	RE: New Albany

I understand and agree with everything, except 8% was the agreed upon interest rate as noted on the economic runs which establised the demand payment between my book and New Albany, LLC.   It is clear that 8% was the agreed upon rate and the true-up needs to be from 9% to 8%.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Zisman, Stuart
Sent:	Tuesday, June 12, 2001 5:56 PM
To:	Presto, Kevin M.
Subject:	FW: New Albany

I think this provides you with the information that you will need to present your case to Lavorato.  Let me know if you need anything else.

Stuart

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Vos, Theresa
Sent:	Tuesday, June 12, 2001 5:48 PM
To:	Zisman, Stuart
Cc:	Pierce, Jody
Subject:	RE: New Albany

Stuart -

The approx $6MM of capital improvements were spent January thru June 2000.  The effect is an additional $1.2MM a year of depreciation for 2001.  I am not sure what Kevin is looking at, but Jenny's 2001 Plan had $17.4MM and we are currently forecasting $17.3MM for 2001.

With regard to the Capital Charge issue.  The interest rate that we were told to use by Delainey was 9% - we have since found out that Lavo is using 8.5% - therefore, in June we will credit the New Albany project with $218K of interest.  Again, Jenny's plan showed $11.8 and the 2001 forecast is $11.8(using 8.5%).  The estimate using 8% is $10.7MM.

Finally, there is only $54K remaining in New Albany's major maintenance account.  We stopped booking a per start accrual sometime last year on all of the Peakers since none of the plants except New Albany were using the reserve.  If my memory serves me correctly, Kelley Huntley and Jenny Latham met with Jody, myself and Scott Chambers in OEC to make this decision - and Jenny discussed it with Kevin.  There was nothing planned for major maintenance.

Please feel free to forward this on to Kevin so that he and Lavorato can resolve these issues.  Let me know if you or Kevin need any additional information regarding New Albany.

theresa
x58173

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Pierce, Jody
Sent:	Tuesday, June 12, 2001 1:49 PM
To:	Vos, Theresa
Subject:	FW: New Albany

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Zisman, Stuart
Sent:	Tuesday, June 12, 2001 8:48 AM
To:	Pierce, Jody
Subject:	New Albany

I am not sure if I mentioned the depreciation issue on the voicemail.  The issue is that there was an increase in the capital cost of the plant (due to additional upgrades and CAPEX that was done after Kevin's agreement with Lavo was cut).  This resulted in an increase in the actual depreciation figures.  Kevin feels that his original deal, based upon the cost of the plant at the time, should be honored.

Stuart


---------------------- Forwarded by Tori Kuykendall/HOU/ECT on 04/05/2001
07:20 AM ---------------------------

ibuyit@enron.com (IBUYIT) on 04/04/2001 04:47:20 PM
Please respond to ibuyit@enron.com
To: undisclosed-recipients:;
cc:
Subject: PR5 : You have received new work items

R/3 System: PR5 . You have received new work items

You are receiving this message because an IT hardware request has been
submitted to your cost
center.  This requires your approval through iBuyit eProcurement.  Please
review these items
in your Inbox at
<http://spr5wb02.enron.com/scripts/wgate/bbpstart/!?~language=en>
Tips: User ID & Password are your SAP Personnel ID & Password.
Initial Password is Enron1.

Easy-to-follow steps for Reviewing and Approving/Rejecting Shopping
Baskets are at:
<http://sap.enron.com/sap_doclib/user/file_list.asp?cabinet_id=205>
For more about iBuy it, click: <http://ibuyit.enron.com>
For help, call the ISC Call Center at 713-345-4727.


With the continued growth of some of the more non-traditional businesses at
Enron; e.g., broadband, agricultural commodities, steel, etc..., it has
become apparent that additional support from Government Affairs, of these and
other non-traditional businesses, is necessary.  To that end, I've asked
Harry Kingerski to focus his time and efforts more fully on developing his
support group's (Government Affairs Support Services) capabilities, with an
objective of broadening their support beyond EES and ENA.  With the void that
Harry leaves in formally directing our group's efforts on behalf of EES, I've
asked Jim Steffes to assume a leadership role with respect to EES as well as
ENA. I've also asked Lisa Yoho to assume responsibility for Enron Industrial
Markets in addition to her responsibility for Enron Global Markets and Enron
Networks.  No further organizational changes are being made at this time but,
as always, organizational flexibility in how our group responds to the needs
of the business units will be the order of the day.  I am confident that all
of us will support Harry, Lisa and Jim with their additional
responsibilities. Thank you.


FYI, not the markets I was hoping to see.

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 02/22/2000 07:13
AM ---------------------------

mflewellyn@columbiaenergygroup.com on 02/21/2000 04:21:43 PM
To: " - *chris.germany@enron.com" <chris.germany@enron.com>
cc: " - *dick.jenkins@enron.com" <dick.jenkins@enron.com>
Subject: market exits

Chris,

As I indicated on our call about a week ago, CES Retail is attempting to exit
a
number of current markets for Major Accounts business only.  The list that
we're contemplating includes CKY, CG&E, DP&L, East Ohio, Indiana Gas, Western
Kentucky, CVA, COH, and BGE.  Again, for those LDCs where we participate in
Choice programs, we will continue to serve those customers.

We are trying to have this accomplished prior to March flow so that we can
take
March 2000 forward out of our physical requirements from Enron.

I'll keep you apprised as additional information becomes available.

Thanks,

Melissa


i will try to call and talk you thru this


you are the big cheese to me baby!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 10:27 AM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

i dont really know what he is going to do, i thought i was always the big cheese

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 10:26 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

REALLY, where is he going? Are you going to be the big cheese now?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 10:25 AM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

i am staying also but john is not

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 10:25 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

no he's staying...what about you?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 10:24 AM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

me too, is chris leaving

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 10:24 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

I wish...that would be my dream job!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 10:23 AM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

really, so who then, me?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 10:23 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

yeah, but I don't know for who...I don't think I will be working for Chris.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 10:22 AM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

im glad to hear that, so are you going to be doing the same thing

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 10:21 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

Not at all...I just now got my offer letter...FINALLY.  What about you? Anything exciting?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 10:20 AM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:

anything exciting going on over there


Tana:

Go ahead and revise the NDA to replace EBS with Net Works and I'll initial
for execution.

Leslie
----- Forwarded by Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT on 10/23/2000 01:23 PM -----

	Laura Howenstine@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
	10/23/2000 11:15 AM

		 To: Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT@ENRON
		 cc: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT@ENRON
		 Subject: Re: one more NDA

Leslie,

Yes, you are correct.  If you can send me the NDA with any modifications that
you require, I'll send it back to Xuma for their signature.

Thanks,
Laura

	Leslie Hansen@ECT
	10/23/00 11:16 AM

		 To: Laura Howenstine/Enron Communications@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS@ENRON
		 cc: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: one more NDA

Laura:

Am I correct in understanding that Xuma signed the EBS form without
modification?  If that is the case, we should prepare the NDA with Enron Net
Works LLC as the party in lieu of EBS and have Xuma execute the revised
agreement.  In the future, we need to use the Net Works form of NDA; however,
since the EBS form has already been sent to and accepted by the Counterparty,
I'm okay using this form.

Regards,

Leslie Hansen

	Laura Howenstine@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
	10/23/2000 10:23 AM

		 To: Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT, tana.jones@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: one more NDA

Tana/Leslie,

Attached is the NDA that we used with Xuma.  They've signed it in hard copy
and sent it back to me, but since then our group has switched from EBS to Net
Works.  Please advise as to how you need to modify this.

Thanks,
Laura

----- Forwarded by Laura Howenstine/Enron Communications on 10/23/00 10:07 AM
-----

	Robin Hill
	09/12/00 03:44 PM

		 To: Laura Howenstine/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: one more NDA

Here is the NDA for XUMA.

Robin L. Hill, Legal Specialist
Enron Broadband Services
1400 Smith, Suite 4545
Houston, Texas 77002
(713)853-3255
(713)646-8537 fax
Robin_Hill@Enron.net

	Laura Howenstine
	09/12/00 02:48 PM

		 To: Robin Hill/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc:
		 Subject: one more NDA

Thanks, Robin.  I actually have another NDA to ask you for and it's a last
minute request for a meeting that I'm attending tomorrow in San Francisco
(for which I'm leaving in an hour or so).

The counter party is a company called XUMA.  The relevant info is below.
Thanks and I'll follow the same procedure as with onexchange.

Regards,
Laura

NDA needed for:
XUMA
160 Pine Street - #200
San Francisco, CA 94111

	Robin Hill
	09/12/00 12:37 PM

		 To: Laura Howenstine/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: NDA

Here is the NDA.  Please select the "Read Only" option in order to open and
print.  Please print 2 originals for signature so each party has an original
executed NDA, or you may e-mail it to them as long as they follow up with 2
originals.  After the other party executes it, you will need to get an EBS
attorney to initial it before an EBS VP or above can execute it on our
behalf.  If you have any questions please call me and please make sure I get
an executed original back.  Thanks.

Robin L. Hill, Legal Specialist
Enron Broadband Services
1400 Smith, Suite 4545
Houston, Texas 77002
(713)853-3255
(713)646-8537 fax
Robin_Hill@Enron.net

	Laura Howenstine
	09/11/00 04:31 PM

		 To: Robin Hill/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: NDA

Hi Robin,

The information that you require for the NDA is in the message below.

Thanks.

Regards,
Laura

----- Forwarded by Laura Howenstine/Enron Communications on 09/11/00 04:33 PM
-----

	ed@onexchange.com
	09/11/00 02:17 PM

		 To: Laura Howenstine/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: NDA

Hi Laura,

Here's all the info:

Ed Cuoco
onExchange
Reservoir Place
1601 Trapelo Road
Waltham, MA 02451
781.672.3400  x223
781.672.3408  fax
www.onexchange.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Laura_Howenstine@enron.net [mailto:Laura_Howenstine@enron.net]
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2000 3:00 PM
To: Ed Cuoco
Subject: NDA

Ed,

I'm sorry to bother you with this, but I have not been able to pull up your
street address on your web site - I get a message that the server is busy.
If
you send me the relevant info on Onexchange, as requested below, I'll send
it on
to our legal department to expedite the NDA.

Thanks.

Regards,
Laura

Laura Howenstine
Manager, Enron Broadband Services
713-853-0308 (office)
713-304-7819 (mobile)
laura_howenstine@enron.net

----- Forwarded by Laura Howenstine/Enron Communications on 09/11/00 01:59
PM
-----
|--------+----------------------->
|        |          Robin Hill   |
|        |                       |
|        |          09/11/00     |
|        |          12:24 PM     |
|        |                       |
|--------+----------------------->

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-|
  |
|
  |       To:     Laura Howenstine/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
|
  |       cc:
|
  |       Subject:     NDA
|

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-|

Laura, please send me the full legal name and address of the company and I
will
draft the NDA for you to forward to the client.  Thanks.

Robin L. Hill, Legal Specialist
Enron Broadband Services
1400 Smith, Suite 4545
Houston, Texas 77002
(713)853-3255
(713)646-8537 fax
Robin_Hill@Enron.net


Dear Everyone:

  As some of you might have heard, I gave my one-week notification last Friday, my last day with Enron will be Thursday, 1/31.  The reason of my leaving is purely visa status, I have nothing but joy working with you all in the last one and half years,  the wonderful experience made the departure a painful decision.

  I shall be around in the next few days should you need anything from me.  I'd like to thank you all for making my work at Enron such a thrill experience, for your support and friendship, I hope I will have a chance and honor to work with you again in the future.

  Good luck to all of us!

- Zhiyun


TASK ASSIGNMENT

Status:		completed

Task Priority:		3
Task Due On:
Task Start Date:


Becky Johnson just called me and said that today is the deadline for imbalance trading however, that is all she knew about the matter.  She transferred me to accounting but I rec'd no answer.  I will keep looking on the website but the only add'l info. I have found is what Jeanne listed below.  I will keep calling tgt in the meantime.

Stephanie

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Wukasch, Jeanne
Sent:	Tuesday, November 20, 2001 10:30 AM
To:	Pereira, Susan W.; Erwin, Stephanie
Subject:	TGT - Imbalance Trade provisions

Here is the provision in the tariff for Imbalance Trading:
Subject to the provisions of Section 17.3(h) above, Customers may resolve their monthly transportation imbalances by trading their imbalance with another Customer. If requested by Customer, Texas Gas will post imbalances available for trades on its EBB. Customers trading offsetting imbalances must provide Texas Gas a notice of their agreement to trade imbalances in writing and signed by both Customers. All imbalance trades must be completed within ten (10) days of the date Texas Gas renders notice to Customer as to their monthly transportation imbalance. Customers must make-up in-kind or cash out all monthly transportation imbalances not resolved through trading in accordance with Section 4 of these General Terms and Conditions.

Since the imbalance data sent to ENA was dated November 10th,   then it appears that TODAY would be the last day to trade this imbalance.

STEPHANIE -- Can you verify this imbalance trading deadline with your TGT rep ?     Does TGT post the imbalance data earlier in the month on their nomination system ?    If so,  then the deadline could have already passed to trade the imbalance.

Jeanne Wukasch
ext.  58495


Return-Path: <felicity.mackay@intel.com>
Received: from  rly-yh03.mx.aol.com (rly-yh03.mail.aol.com [172.18.147.35])
by air-yh01.mail.aol.com (v76_r1.23) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Nov 2000 18:41:59
-0500
Received: from  thalia.fm.intel.com (thalia.fm.intel.com [132.233.247.11]) by
rly-yh03.mx.aol.com (v76_r1.19) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Nov 2000 18:41:35 -0400
Received: from SMTP (fmsmsxvs02-1.fm.intel.com [132.233.42.202]) by
thalia.fm.intel.com (8.9.1a+p1/8.9.1/d: relay.m4,v 1.32 2000/10/12 22:57:04
dmccart Exp $) with SMTP id XAA19327; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 23:39:15 GMT
Received: from fmsmsx29.FM.INTEL.COM ([132.233.48.29]) by 132.233.48.202
(Norton AntiVirus for Internet Email Gateways 1.0) ;  Mon, 06 Nov 2000
23:37:58 0000 (GMT)
Received: by fmsmsx29.fm.intel.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
id <V8CGGPB4>; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 15:37:55 -0800
Message-ID: <1D28B91BEE38D411AC6D00902785733F0180835D@fmsmsx90.fm.intel.com>
From: "Mackay, Felicity" <felicity.mackay@intel.com>
To: "Sundstrom, Bjorn S" <bjorn.s.sundstrom@intel.com>,        "Julie Lewis
(E-mail)" <julie.lewis@cmck.com>
Cc: "Sheets, Brian D" <brian.d.sheets@intel.com>,        "Marcin, MelissaX"
<melissax.marcin@intel.com>,        "Michelle Fasching (E-mail)"
<m_fasching@yahoo.com>,        "Kelly, Shane D"
<shane.d.kelly@intel.com>,        "Sven Trautmann (E-mail)"
<sven@globedesign.com>,        "Tim Brenner (E-mail)"
<tim_brenner@mentorg.com>,        "Una Kim (E-mail)"
<unakim1@yahoo.com>,        "Una Maher (E-mail)"
<una_maher@yahoo.com>,        "Dale Parker (E-mail)"
<dparker2@uswest.net>,        "Dibble Erik (E-mail)"
<erikvd@sportsmail.com>,        "Elizah Mayhem (E-mail)"
<lillahmay@aol.com>,        "Julie Lewis (E-mail)"
<julie.lewis@cmck.com>,        "Nir Hamzani (E-mail)"
<nir_h@netvision.ner.il>,        "Diana Fusco (E-mail)" <haus2@hotmail.com>,
      "Doreen Samuel (E-mail)"  <samuelp@cardiff.ac.uk>,        "Tom Gregg
(E-mail)" <tgregg@MAHLUM.com>
Subject:  in-depth answers to an age old question
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 15:37:53 -0800
Return-Receipt-To: "Mackay, Felicity" <felicity.mackay@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

WHY DID THE CHICKEN CROSS THE ROAD?

VICE PRESIDENT GORE
I fight for the chickens and I am fighting for the chickens right now.
I will not give up on the chickens crossing the road! I will fight for the
chickens and I will not disappoint them.

GOVERNOR GEORGE W. BUSH
I don't believe we need to get the chickens across the road. I say
give the road to the chickens and let them decide when and how they
want to cross the road. The government needs to stop interfering with the
chickens so they can cross the road.

SENATOR LIEBERMAN
I believe that every chicken has the right to worship their God in
their own way. Crossing the road is a spiritual journey and no
chicken should be denied the right to cross the road in their own way.

SECRETARY CHENEY
Chickens are big-time animals because they have wings. They could
fly if they wanted to. Chickens don't want to cross the road. They
don't need help crossing the road. In fact, I'm not interested in crossing
the
road myself.

RALPH NADER
Chickens are misled into believing there is a road by the evil
tiremakers. Chickens aren't ignorant, but our society pays
tiremakers to create the need for these roads and then lures chickens
into believing there is an advantage to crossing them. Down with the
roads, up with chickens.

PAT BUCHANAN
To steal a job from a decent, hardworking American.

JERRY FALWELL
Because the chicken was gay! Isn't it obvious?
Can't you people see the plain truth in front of your face?
The chicken was going to the "other side." That's what "they"
call it-the "other side." Yes, my friends, that chicken is gay.
And, if you eat that chicken, you will become gay too. I say we
boycott all chickens until we sort out this abomination that the
liberal media whitewashes with seemingly harmless phrases like "the
other side," That chicken should not be free to cross the road. It's as
plain and simple as that.

DR. SEUSS
Did the chicken cross the road?
Did he cross it with a toad?
Yes! The chicken crossed the road,
but why it crossed, I've not been told!

ERNEST HEMINGWAY
To die. In the rain.

MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR.
I envision a world where all chickens will be free to
cross without having their motives called into question.

GRANDPA
In my day, we didn't ask why the chicken crossed the
road. Someone told us that the chicken crossed the road,
and that was good enough for us.

ARISTOTLE
It is the nature of chickens to cross the road.

KARL MARX
It was a historical inevitability.

SADDAM HUSSEIN
This was an unprovoked act of rebellion and we were
quite justified in dropping 50 tons of nerve gas on it.

RONALD REAGAN
What chicken?

CAPTAIN JAMES T. KIRK
To boldly go where no chicken has gone before.

FOX MULDER
You saw it cross the road with your own eyes. How
many more chickens have to cross before you believe it?

FREUD
The fact that you are at all concerned that the
chicken crossed the road reveals your underlying sexual
insecurity.

BILL GATES
I have just released Echicken 2000, which will not
only cross roads, but will lay eggs, file your important
documents, and balance your checkbook -and Internet Explorer is
an inextricable part of eChicken.

EINSTEIN
Did the chicken really cross the road or did the road
move beneath the chicken?

BILL CLINTON
I did not cross the road with THAT chicken. What do
you mean by "chicken"? Could you define "chicken" please?

GEORGE BUSH
I don't think I should have to answer that question.

LOUIS FARRAKHAN
The Road, you will see, represents the black man. The
chicken crossed the "black man" in order to trample him and
keep him down.

COLONEL SANDERS
I missed one?


This request has been pending your approval for  37 days.  Please click http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000079466&Page=Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000079466
Request Create Date : 12/17/01 4:09:11 PM
Requested For       : rodney.malcolm@enron.com
Resource Name       : eConnect - VPN  Tier 2 - Full Access
Resource Type       : Applications


This meeting will take place in 30C1 from 11:30 - 1:30.  Please confirm your
attendance.

Thank You!
Yvette
x3.5953

Daren J Farmer@ECT
02/08/2000 05:08 PM
To: Ami Chokshi/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Stacey Neuweiler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat
Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robert E Lloyd/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carlos J
Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly Vaughn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Charlotte
Hawkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stella L Morris/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan D
Trevino/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jackie Young/HOU/ECT@ECT, Aimee Lannou/HOU/ECT@ECT,
George Grant/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mandy MacKinnon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Bryan Hull/HOU/ECT@ECT, O'Neal D Winfree/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael
Walters/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve
Venturatos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Acton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Gary A Hanks/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Brenda F Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT, Yvette G Connevey/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: HPL System Brown Bag

Please plan on attending a training session over lunch on Tuesday, Feb 15th.
(Lunch will be provided.)  I intend to discuss the operations of Houston Pipe
Line;  how gas is moved through the system, where our main supply and market
areas are, locations of specific points, etc.  We will be using a map of the
pipeline as the basis for the discussion.  So, come to the meeting with any
questions you have on HPL, anything is fair game.

Yvette is currently working on securing a room.  I will let you know when
that is finalized.

Let me know if you have any questions.

D


Attached is a revised draft of the Letter Agreement between ENA and
Tejas which has been marked to show the changes from the November 30
draft prepared by ENA.

 - 5WLNS01_.DOC


I will be starting in the Chicago office on March 12th.  My move date is
March 8th.

Let me know if you need anything else.

Thanks for your help,
Robin


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Imai, Rika
Sent:	Wednesday, November 21, 2001 10:51 AM
To:	Black, Tamara Jae
Subject:	AGENDA FOR PIRA PRESENTATION

TJ,
Please send this out to all the traders
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

PIRA will be here on  Monday, December 3rd from 3:30-5:30.

The meeting will be located on the 6th floor in room 6980.

If you have any specific topics you would like to have covered, please feel free to send me an e-mail

Thank You

Rika

Electricity & Fuels Briefing
Allan M. Stewart, Managing Director

AGENDA

Agenda:  This Agenda sets out a broad set of topics which will be covered in handout charts and tables accompanying this briefing. Active participation is encouraged to help efficiently utilize the time of discussion in line with areas of greatest interest.  In addition any questions forwarded in advance will be addressed.

Briefing Objective:  Review and analyze key drivers of electricity & fuel prices at various regional markets throughout North America, with a special emphasis on those subregions of the Eastern Grids. Discuss the key factors/risks in PIRA's reference case outlook and explore important alternative scenarios. Principal timeframes will be now through 3Q2002 (short-term), and 2002-4 (medium-term). There will be a brief discussion of strategic issues and those relating to longer-term timeframes.

Short-Term Electricity & Fuels Outlook (Next 12 Months)
Electricity Price Outlook (vs. Current Consensus)
Overall Load, Resource & Price Assessments
Capacity Modeling & Results
Hydro, Fuels, & Environmental Developments
Implications for Natural Gas Demand/Prices

Medium-Term Electricity & Fuels Outlook (1 -3 Years)
Capacity Outlook
Survey Results & Implications For Prices & Asset Values
Structural Change Prospects and Potential Impacts
Strategic Implications For Traders/Asset Managers
Implications for Natural Gas Demand/Prices

Longer-Term & Strategic Issues for Future Electricity & Fuels Markets
	-	Outlook For Capacity Additions, Retirements, Environmental Factors & Prices
Potential Strategy Options For Consideration

Fuels & Emissions Markets
Natural Gas, Oil, and Coal Market Outlooks & Risks
Significant Emission Markets Developments


PLEASE FORWARD TO THE PERSON IN CHARGE OF YOUR OUTAGE CO-ORDINATION

To Outage Coordinators :

Effective June 8 2001, in accordance with Executive Order D-23-01, the ISO
will be implementing the Interim SLIC Outage Web Page (
https://slic.caiso.com ).   This will be the primary means of reporting
planned outages to the ISO. After June 8, 2001, the current fax, telephone
and e-mail method of reporting will still be available for emergency use
only.

The updated SLIC users manual (with screen shots) is now available on our
website at the following URL
<http://www.caiso.com/docs/2001/03/29/2001032906410829431.html>.

The XML Upload/ Download Specification will be available and posted to the
website  on 5/25/01. As stated above, the implementation date will occur 2
weeks later on June 8, 2001.

For your final testing and integration processes, outages may be reported to
the CAISO in parallel via the web page and your normal reporting method for
the next two weeks.

Any questions please contact Michael Martin at mmartin@caiso.com.

Client Relations Communication
CRCommunications@caiso.com


Sheila:  Mike Fowler is involved in this effort.  He tells me that the entity
is "EnronCredit.com Limited".  Is this info correct?  Sara

	Sheila Glover
	08/11/2000 10:44 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: EnronCredit.com Limited electronic trading agreements

Sara,
What entity are these agreements in.  If they are in ECT Investments name, I
think you should do.  If they are in ENA name, London can sign.
sheila
---------------------- Forwarded by Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT on 08/11/2000 10:38
AM ---------------------------
From: Sara Shackleton on 08/11/2000 10:20 AM
To: Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT, Paul Simons/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samantha
Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron, Mike Fowler/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: EnronCredit.com Limited electronic trading agreements

Justin/Paul:  The Houston contingent of EnronCredit.com Limited has a number
of agreements which they would like to have executed.  All ENA/Enron Corp.
affiliate brokerage/futures agreements are signed by the Enron trading party
TOGETHER WITH Ted Murphy (for control purposes).  I am currently reviewing
about 4-6 of these agreements.

How should we handle review of the referenced agreements originating from
Houston?  Shall I continue to review?
Do you have trading resoutions/authorized trader lists in place for
EnronCredit.com Limited?

I look forward to hearing from you.  Sara


MAPP OASIS WILL BE DOWN TONIGHT, for 1 HOUR!

Dear MAPP Transmission Providers and Customers,

On Wednesday, May 16th at 11:30pm CDT the MAPP OASIS NODE will be taken
off-line for approximately 1 hour for database maintenance.  At the same
time the latest version of OASIS software will be installed , v2.7.0d.

How does this effect MAPP Transmission Providers:

The new version of OASIS software allows for specific redirect service
types.  Two new option fields have been added to the service types, "Allow
on Redirect" and "Account on Reduction".

These two fields can be changed by selecting "Transmission Services" under
Provider Maintenance, and then click on the ID to update the transmission
service.

The "Allow on Redirect" option determines whether the service type appears
in the drop down box on the REDIRECT transmission request template.

The "Account On Reduction" determines whether REDIRECT request types appear
in the "Query for Reductions".

All services types will default to "No" for
the two new fields for existing transmission services.

Requirements:
Before the upgrade
1.  All "Capacity Type" entries must be unique for each transmission
provider.  Please change your "Capacity Types" so that they are unique.

 The "Capacity Type" will be changed by the MAPPCOR staff at the time of
upgrade if the unique "Capacity Type" for each provider is violated.

After the upgrade
1.  If you do have Redirect transmission service types then select "Yes" for
the "Allow on Redirect" field.

The MAPP OASIS Test node is available for testing version 2.7.0d.  The test
node can be accessed at:
http://mappb3.oasis.mapp.org/OASIS14/NODE/MAPPB3

How does this effect MAPP Schedule F Customers:

MAPP Schedule F Transmission Customers should select "HNF Secondary" as the
Service for redirecting a CONFIRMED MAPP Schedule F Firm reservation as
Non-Firm.

In addition, to redirect a CONFIRMED MAPP Schedule F Firm
reservation on Firm basis then one of the following services should be
selected "FCTS Daily", "FCTS Weekly", "FCTS Monthly", "FCTS Seasonal", "FCTS
Yearly", and "FCTS Monthly 1 Month" depending on the remaining duration.

Please try to have your business needs concluded prior to this outage.  We
apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.

Please contact the MAPP Transaction Coordinator if you have further
questions at 651.632.8508 or at transcoords@mapp.org.

Thank you in advance for your cooperation.

Sincerely,

MAPP Transaction Coordinator

651.632.8508
transcoords@mapp.org


Attached is the latest draft of the referenced GTC.