You don't need to keep the attachment.  I was going to read it online -- but since you've printed I'll take it along for casual reading.   I just want to add Liz Gras email address to my contacts.  Sorry for the confusion.

-----Original Message-----
From: Winters, Ricki
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 9:30 AM
To: Corman, Shelley
Subject: RE: PAKK: Digest Number 529

I printed the attachment & will keep in my folder for future reference.

(quite long)

-----Original Message-----
From: Corman, Shelley
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 9:15 AM
To: Winters, Ricki
Subject: FW: PAKK: Digest Number 529

Please add to contacts

-----Original Message-----
From: LGras91577@aol.com [mailto:LGras91577@aol.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 8:18 AM
To: Corman, Shelley
Subject: Fwd: PAKK: Digest Number 529

Shelley,
I don't know if you've joined this group or not, but I they had some
informative posts about Adoption Discounted airfare, and Taraz and I thought
you might like to read it.

Liz


Hi.  My palm for some reason isn't syncing.  Could you have Chris give me a
call to try to get it to work?  Thanks a bunch.

Best,
Jeff

415.782.7822


What do you think?


I know Steve Murray quite well.


Many apologies comrade!  By the way, "organization" is spelled with a "z" not
an "s" in American English.  Or do you write in English American now?  DF

Mark Schroeder@ECT
10/13/2000 10:07 AM
To: Drew.Fossum@enron.com @ ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Government Affairs Organizational Changes

he manages the Americas, I manage everything outside the Americas.  his
changes do not affect me or my organisation, smartass!  mcs

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Drew.Fossum@enron.com                           12/10/2000 14:17

To: mschroeder@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Government Affairs Organizational Changes

What's up?  Did Rick fire you?  Or does he work for you now?  DF
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 10/12/2000
03:17 PM ---------------------------

Shelley Corman
10/12/2000 01:13 PM

To:   Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron, Bill Cordes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Danny
      McCarty/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew
      Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Robert Kilmer/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Dorothy
      McCoppin/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Michael Moran/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ray
      Neppl/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Janet Place/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, John
      Shafer/OTS/Enron@Enron, David L Johnson/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Phil
      Lowry/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Nancy Bagot/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Janet
      Butler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject:  Government Affairs Organizational Changes

FYI:  Attached is a memo from Rick Shapiro outlining organizational changes
in the Government Affairs group, most significantly the appointment of a
new head of the Washington office.

This is a great time to be at Enron. The challenges and opportunities at
Enron seem to be expanding with every passing day.  This presents enormous
challenges for Government Affairs as a group and for each of us
individually.  As we discussed at the staff meeting last month, this
requires us to constantly reevaluate our priorities, our methods of getting
things done, and whether our organization is properly structured to meet
the needs of the entire company.  While we have done an outstanding job as
a group within our current structure, changes are necessary at this time.

The primary change in the organizational structure is to complete the
assignments for and reinforce the leadership roles of the individuals
within the group who have primary responsibility for setting the Government
Affairs strategy and agenda for the respective Enron operating companies.
The below mentioned individuals will have the following responsibilities:

1.   Enron North America and Enron Industrial Markets:  Jim Steffes
2.   The Enron Energy Services Group of Companies:  Harry Kingerski
3.   Enron Broadband Services:  Sue Nord
4.   Enron Global Markets and Enron Networks:  Lisa Yoho
5.   Enron South America:  Jose Bestard
6.   Federal Government Affairs:  Linda Robertson

     With the impending retirement on March 31, 2001 of Joe Hillings, I am
     pleased to announce that Linda Robertson will be joining the office on
     November 6, 2000, as a Vice President who will immediately assume
     responsibility for leading the Federal Government Affairs group in our
     Washington office.  Linda was a Congressional staffer and
     partner/principal in two Washington law firms prior to spending the
     last eight years with the U.S. Department of Treasury, the last five
     as Assistant Secretary for Legislative Affairs and Public Liaison, for
     Secretaries Rubin & Summers.  Linda brings a terrific background, both
     in energy and financial services, and is a welcome addition to our
     team.  In order to more effectively integrate the Government Affairs
     groups and strategy in Washington, the Federal Regulatory Affairs
     group under Joe Hartsoe's direction will also report to Linda.  Joe
     Hartsoe will also retain primary responsibility for NERC activities,
     although Charles Yeung and Dick Ingersoll will have a dotted line
     reporting relationship to Jim Steffes in his capacity of directing our
     activities for ENA.  Ray Alvarez will be transferring from his current
     role with Transredes in Bolivia during the 1st quarter of 2001 and
     will join the Federal Regulatory Affairs group, reporting to Joe
     Hartsoe.

     On a personal note, I would like to acknowledge the significant
     contributions that Joe Hillings has made to this company in his
     eighteen years of service.  Joe's work ethic, intellect, and integrity
     have established Enron as a company that is respected throughout
     Washington.  I will have more to say about this as Joe's retirement
     draws closer, but I look to him to be a vital part of the leadership
     transition in our Washington office that will occur over the next days
     and weeks.

I will be relying heavily on the above-identified six individuals to ensure
that Government Affairs is firmly embedded within each of our operating
companies; that we as a group thoroughly understand their current business
strategies as well as new directions they may be taking in the future; and,
most importantly, to thoroughly understand how our organization can
contribute and add value to each of these companies on a continuing basis.
Communicating that understanding on a regular basis to the rest of the
Government Affairs organization and developing a Government Affairs wide
execution strategy will be a key objective for each of these individuals.

In order to ensure the success of these individuals and the Government
Affairs organization; the following changes are being made.

   In addition to his leadership role with Government Affairs on behalf of
   the EES group of companies, Harry Kingerski will continue to head up the
   rates/regulatory group, now renamed Government Affairs Support Services.
   This group will continue to provide valuable technical support services
   throughout Government Affairs and will be expanding its scope of
   expertise over the next months to some of the new markets that the
   company has and will soon be entering.  Nancy Hetrick and Vinio Floris
   will join this organization and report to Harry.
   Jeff Brown, Tom Delaney, Mary Hain, Ron McNamara, Christi Nicolay, Thane
   Twiggs, and Steve Walton will now report to Jim Steffes in his role
   supporting Enron North America and Enron Industrial Markets. Alberto
   Levy will be relocating from our Caracas, Venezuela office and will also
   report to Jim.  A couple of special mentions:  Jeff Brown has done an
   outstanding job in leading the CUBR (Coalition for Uniform Business
   Rules) process over the last year and his current leadership of the
   Midwest ISO and Alliance RTO efforts for Enron will be critical to the
   development of well functioning wholesale electric markets in the U.S.
   It is also my hope that Steve Walton will play an increased leadership
   role across North America on wholesale electric market issues.  The
   incredible knowledge that Steve Walton possesses of the electric
   industry, coupled with his industry-wide credibility, will provide much
   needed support to our wholesale electric market reform efforts across
   North America.
   Tom Hoatson will now report to Steve Montovano in his new role in
   supporting the company's efforts at PJM.  Tom will also continue to be
   an organization-wide resource on technical issues regarding generation
   interconnection and distributed generation.  Kathleen Sullivan has
   recently joined Steve's group from Azurix and will be primarily
   assisting Howard Fromer in New York.
   Sue Nord will head up the group that supports EBS.  Scott Bolton and
   Donald Lassere, while reporting to Sue, will continue to provide
   leadership on telecommunications issues.  Scott and Donald have done
   outstanding work and will continue to be integral to our efforts in this
   area.
   Finally, the Resource Commitment Review (RCR) process, beginning 1/1/01,
   will be extended to all of Government Affairs in North America,
   including Federal Government Affairs and Mexico.  The RCR Committee,
   beginning immediately, will be expanded and will consist of Harry
   Kingerski, Sue Nord,  Linda Roberston, Jim Steffes, Lisa Yoho & myself.

Please feel free to call me if you have any questions.

Thank you


Group

We have 10 MW of length from Sierra through the APX light load at $185.  Stan
purchased this NP15 length from the APX and it should be scheduled DA by
Jeremy.  There should be a ECTRT load zone in PGE3 with this length.  Use
whatever opportunities are out there (dynegy across COB or a straight export)
to maximize this position.  The deal numbers are: 581335-purchase from APX
and 581356-desk to desk deal.  Please make sure this gets taken care of.

Cheers
Jesse


Thanks Dr.Kaminski,
I forgot that :-)
I'll understand it as
I may identify work that I think will be
beneficial to both of us.
Actually,
I have more ideas on the work, beyond the suggestion.
I'll work on it and send it in more formal way again.
(I mean, work list, schedule, deliverables etc)

I'll take steps to get work permit for those two months.
And please tell me know what you can support
and what I should start to do to find a place to stay,
rent a car etc.

Warm regards,
Jinbaek

ps. and thanks for forwarding the message.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jinbaek Kim
Ph.D Candidate
Dept. of Industrial Engineering and Operations Research
U.C.Berkeley
http://www.ieor.berkeley.edu/~jinbaek

Go Bears!

      :"'._..---.._.'";       `.             .'       .'           `.
     :      a   a      :                 __....._
     :     _.-0-._     :---'""'"-....--'"        '.
      :  .'   :   `.  :                          `,`.
       `.: '--'--' :.'                             ; ;
        : `._`-'_.'                                ;.'
        `.   '"'                                   ;
         `.               '                        ;
          `.     `        :           `            ;
           .`.    ;       ;           :           ;
         .'    `-.'      ;            :          ;`.
     __.'      .'      .'              :        ;   `.
   .'      __.'      .'`--..__      _._.'      ;      ;
   `......'        .'         `'""'`.'        ;......-'
         `.......-'                 `........'

On Thu, 22 Mar 2001 Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com wrote:

>
> Jinbaek,
>
> The answer to the 1st question is yes.
> The project list is fine with me and is still valid. We are an organization
> driven by the needs of our internal customers.
>
> I shall froward your message to the  person in EBS.
> Hopefully, we shall get a positive response.
>
>
> Vince
>
>
>
>
>
> Jinbaek Kim <jinbaek@ieor.berkeley.edu> on 03/15/2001 01:12:32 AM
>
> To:   Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
> cc:
> Subject:  Summer internship
>
>
> Dr. Kaminski,
>
> Sorry for the late response,
> it took me some time to coordinate things.
> Finally, it's almost dont :-)
> It turned out that from June to August
> will be best for me for work at ENRON
> (Say June.4 to August.4)
>
> But I still need to know several things from your side.
> Could you answer following questions?
>
> First:
> Is my suggested working period is OK with you?
> If so, let me know what to do for settlement
> during the period.
>
> Second:
> I got a list of work, I might be able to do for
> DealBench team from Ross and Suresh.
> I'd like to know it is still a valid work list:
> The list he sent is as following:
>
> > 1.  Write a paper in layman's terms that answers
> > questions like the following:
> > Benefits of auctioning online for both buyers and
> > sellers, particularly in reverse auctions
> > Explanation how multi-variable auctions are not
> > as efficient as price-only auctions (is this true?)
> > How many participants are recommended for a
> > successful live auction
> > What types of goods and services are best suited
> > for live auctions versus sealed bid quotes
> > Opinions on lotting strategies
> > Trends in online private auctions
>
> > 2.  Identify appropriate recent auction research (3
> > or 4 papers out of the 90+ you provided)and obtain approvals from the
> > authors to post on our site
>
> > 3. Create a list/bibiliography of relevant auction
> > literature (with hyperlinks?)
>
> > 4.  Would you be willing to offer auction consulting
> > services to our customers (if they are interested)
>
> Third:
> There is an e-procurement forum at Haas School of business,
> in May 22. The chair of the forum is my advisor Prof. Arie Segev.
> A person from Wells Fargo Bank will talk about Wells Fargo's role
> in e-marketplace payment initiative,
> where ENRON broadband services is also one of key players
> along with Citibank.
> He asked me whether you can contact a person at
> ENRON broadband services, who's related to the initiative.
> He wants to know whether we will have a speaker from ENRON
> to see ENRON's perspective, in the Forum.
>
> Here is a link to news related to the initiative,
>
> http://www.internetweek.com/story/INW20000808S0001
>
> Fourth:
> My advisor wants to know whether
> there could be any opportunity to do a case study,
> regarding ENRON's business.
> He is interested in e-procurement and e-marketplaces.
> Business model and System architecture...
>
> Thanks for reading this long email.
> I'll look forward to your answer..
> I am sorry for giving you so much burden
> to answer those questions possibly not easy to answer.
>
> Warm regards,
> Jinbaek
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Jinbaek Kim
> Ph.D Candidate
> Dept. of Industrial Engineering and Operations Research
> U.C.Berkeley
> http://www.ieor.berkeley.edu/~jinbaek
>
> Go Bears!
>
>       :"'._..---.._.'";       `.             .'       .'           `.
>      :      a   a      :                 __....._
>      :     _.-0-._     :---'""'"-....--'"        '.
>       :  .'   :   `.  :                          `,`.
>        `.: '--'--' :.'                             ; ;
>         : `._`-'_.'                                ;.'
>         `.   '"'                                   ;
>          `.               '                        ;
>           `.     `        :           `            ;
>            .`.    ;       ;           :           ;
>          .'    `-.'      ;            :          ;`.
>      __.'      .'      .'              :        ;   `.
>    .'      __.'      .'`--..__      _._.'      ;      ;
>    `......'        .'         `'""'`.'        ;......-'
>          `.......-'                 `........'
>
>
> On Mon, 5 Mar 2001 Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com wrote:
>
> >
> > Jinbaek,
> >
> > This is fine though you are welcome to spend more
> > time with us this summer.
> >
> > Vince
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Jinbaek Kim <jinbaek@ieor.berkeley.edu> on 03/04/2001 03:45:40 PM
> >
> > To:   Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
> > cc:
> > Subject:  Re: Summer internship
> >
> >
> > Dr. Kaminski,
> >
> > Thanks for your answer.
> > Before I tell you the time frame,
> > I'll need to talk with my advisor, first.
> > Because here is an on-going-project.
> > I need to coordinate the schedule.
> >
> > I'll appreciate it if you understand my situation,
> > and give me some time (less than a week, of course).
> >
> > For your reference,
> > probably
> > the dates I'd like to ask you will be
> > from mid-May to mid-July (2 months)
> >
> > Warm regards,
> > Jinbaek
> >
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Jinbaek Kim
> > Ph.D Candidate
> > Dept. of Industrial Engineering and Operations Research
> > U.C.Berkeley
> > http://www.ieor.berkeley.edu/~jinbaek
> >
> > Go Bears!
> >
> >       :"'._..---.._.'";       `.             .'       .'           `.
> >      :      a   a      :                 __....._
> >      :     _.-0-._     :---'""'"-....--'"        '.
> >       :  .'   :   `.  :                          `,`.
> >        `.: '--'--' :.'                             ; ;
> >         : `._`-'_.'                                ;.'
> >         `.   '"'                                   ;
> >          `.               '                        ;
> >           `.     `        :           `            ;
> >            .`.    ;       ;           :           ;
> >          .'    `-.'      ;            :          ;`.
> >      __.'      .'      .'              :        ;   `.
> >    .'      __.'      .'`--..__      _._.'      ;      ;
> >    `......'        .'         `'""'`.'        ;......-'
> >          `.......-'                 `........'
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 2 Mar 2001 Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Jinbaek,
> > >
> > > You can coordinate the details with me.
> > > Let me know what the time frame is for you
> > > and we shall send you an appropriate offer.
> > >
> > > Vince
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Jinbaek Kim <jinbaek@ieor.berkeley.edu> on 03/02/2001 04:43:06 PM
> > >
> > > To:   Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
> > > cc:
> > > Subject:  Re: Summer internship
> > >
> > >
> > > Dr. Kaminski,
> > >
> > > Thank you very much.
> > > Of course, I'll be happy to have an opportunity
> > > to work at such a wonderful company.
> > > I was contacting with Surech Raghavan at Deal Bench team,
> > > and was going to express my appreciation to you again
> > > after settling down process with them.
> > >
> > > For the period of working,
> > > I still need to coordinate with my advisor and
> > > may need to adjust according to that.
> > > but anyway, I'll try to coordinate smoothly.
> > >
> > > Please let me know whether I should keep contacting
> > > with Deal Bench team,
> > > for working period and
> > > for misc. living support such as finding a place, rent a car, etc.
> > >
> > > I appreciate you so much again,
> > > for arranging such meetings and giving me an opportunity.
> > > All this opportunity will not be available to me,
> > > without your kind help.
> > >
> > > Warm Regards,
> > > Jinbaek
> > >
> > > -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > Jinbaek Kim
> > > Ph.D Candidate
> > > Dept. of Industrial Engineering and Operations Research
> > > U.C.Berkeley
> > > http://www.ieor.berkeley.edu/~jinbaek
> > >
> > > Go Bears!
> > >
> > >       :"'._..---.._.'";       `.             .'       .'           `.
> > >      :      a   a      :                 __....._
> > >      :     _.-0-._     :---'""'"-....--'"        '.
> > >       :  .'   :   `.  :                          `,`.
> > >        `.: '--'--' :.'                             ; ;
> > >         : `._`-'_.'                                ;.'
> > >         `.   '"'                                   ;
> > >          `.               '                        ;
> > >           `.     `        :           `            ;
> > >            .`.    ;       ;           :           ;
> > >          .'    `-.'      ;            :          ;`.
> > >      __.'      .'      .'              :        ;   `.
> > >    .'      __.'      .'`--..__      _._.'      ;      ;
> > >    `......'        .'         `'""'`.'        ;......-'
> > >          `.......-'                 `........'
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, 2 Mar 2001 Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > Sorry for a delay in getting back to you.
> > > > We would like very much to offer you a summer internship.
> > > >
> > > > Please, let me know if you are interested.
> > > >
> > > > Vince Kaminski
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>


The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  ? 2001 Carr Futures

The charts are now available on the web by clicking on the hot link(s)
contained in this email. If for any reason you are unable to receive the
charts via the web, please contact me via email and I will email the charts
to you as attachments.

Crude     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/crude18.pdf
Natural Gas     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/ngas18.pdf
Distillate     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hoil18.pdf
Unleaded     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/unlded18.pdf

Dec/Red Dec WTI Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/clz2-clz3.pdf
April Heat Crack     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/heatcrack.pdf
April Gas Crack     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/gascrack.pdf
Feb Gas/Heat Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hug-hog.pdf
June Gas/Heat Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/HUM-HOM.pdf
March Gas/Heat Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/HUH-HOH.pdf
Feb/May Unlead Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/HUG-HUK.pdf
April/Dec Crude oil Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/clj-clz.pdf

Nat Gas Strip Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/StripmatrixNG18.pdf
Nat Gas Spread Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SpreadmatrixNG18.pdf

Crude and Products Spread Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SpreadmatrixCL18.pdf

Mean Reversion Data on CL & Products Spreads
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/crude01-30-02.pdf


Start Date: 4/17/01; HourAhead hour: 5;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041705.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 5 / Preferred:  12.00 / Final:  11.98)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/17/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_ERNIE
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL


pls print.  thanks. df
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 03/21/2000
04:44 PM ---------------------------

Heather Mueck
03/20/2000 04:18 PM
To: Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Bob Chandler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, James
Centilli/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kent
Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Sue M Neville/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Elaine
Concklin/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: SAB 101


The report named: VaR and Peak Position Report By Trader <http://erv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=22&report_name=VaR+and+Peak+Position+Report+By+Trader&category_cd=5&category_name=EAST&toc_hide=1&sTV1=5&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=10/22/2001>, published as of 10/22/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


You are receiving this exclusive promotion from fastFREEnews.com as part of the terms of service agreed to when you signed up. Please follow the instructions at the end of the message if you would prefer not to receive these special offers in the future.
  Forward to:
     [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]    [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]    [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] [IMAGE]      Dear Andrew,  Enter today  for your chance to win a new Chevy Tahoe SUV!  Designed for rugged exceptional comfort the Tahoe offers everything you want from an SUV.      By simply letting us know what you are interested in, you will earn a chance to win this gorgeous vehicle.  It's as simple as that!       This could be the car of your dreams, but you can't win if you don't enter.    Already entered  previously? Improve  your odds by entering again!    Good Luck!  Stephanie & Mark  Co-Founders, winfreestuff.com   14210 Hillsdale Circle Omaha, NE 68137    [IMAGE] [IMAGE]     [IMAGE] [IMAGE]

 Other Sweepstakes and FREE offers
 LuckySurf  - $1,000,000 Daily and tons of other prizes Grab.com  - Home of the One Billion Dollar Sweepstakes. DreamMates.com  - Visit the web's favorite meeting place Credit Card  - Apply Today - Get an UNSECURED VISA & MASTERCARD!   Cassandra Hibbons Promotions Manager fastFREEnews.com
To opt out of any future mailings from fastFREEnews, click here: http://www.fastfreenews.com/unsubscribe.asp

[IMAGE]


Brad,

Could you e-mail me your mailing address so I can send off a cheque.

Please make sure I've maximized my foreign content as I don't love the TSE at
9300.

What did you think of that Enron announcement?

Chris


(See attached file: FOMC Meeting.pdf)

      Carr Futures
      150 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 1500
      Chicago, IL 60606  USA
      Tel:  312-368-6149
      Fax:  312-368-2281
      soblander@carrfut.com
      http://www.carrfut.com
 - FOMC Meeting.pdf


Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2000 07:43:01 -0500
From: "Tracey Bradley" <tbradley@bracepatt.com>
To: "Deanna King" <dking@bracepatt.com>, "Paul Fox" <pfox@bracepatt.com>,
"Ronald Carroll" <rcarroll@bracepatt.com>
Subject: CAISO Press Release re 10-21-00 Market Stabilization Plan
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Disposition: inline

Friday October 20, 8:00 pm Eastern Time

Press Release

California ISO Offers Market Stabilization Proposal

Calls for Forum for Reaching Consensus on Market Power Mitigation

FOLSOM, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Oct. 20, 2000--Hoping to trigger consensus
building that will lead to solutions to volatile energy prices, the
California Independent System Operator (California ISO) filed a Market
Stabilization Proposal with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC)
today, Friday, Oct. 20, 2000.

The plan was unveiled during a news conference at the ISO's Folsom Control
Center this morning. California ISO CEO Terry Winter described the plan as a
discussion platform -- a document not etched in stone but rather introduced
as a means for putting the brakes on market prices and finding long-term
solutions that will protect consumers from high bills while stimulating new
investment in power plants.

The California ISO is asking FERC to consider the following regulatory steps:

Institute Payment Cap of $100 in all markets with the following exemptions:
Generators that can prove they will lose money if capped on that rate
Generators that contract 70 percent of their supply to serve California
customers
Renewable generation -- Generation facilities less than 50 megawatts -- New
power plants -- Imported power
The existing $250 per megawatt hour price cap would still exist and serve as
the absolute price ceiling for suppliers exempt from the $100 payment cap.

``We cannot simply apply a short-term patch for market power, without also
addressing the underlying problems causing sky-high prices,'' said California
ISO CEO Terry Winter. ``Consumers have little control over how they can
respond to high prices. There are traffic jams on the transmission systems
that keep us from moving electricity efficiently around the state, not to
mention the fact there are not enough megawatts to meet the needs of
consumers. And, the lack of forward contracting scheduling means the
California ISO is making up for huge shortfalls ten minutes before the power
is consumed.''

Along with providing the incentive for generators (sellers) to sign formal
contracts, the California ISO also recommends requiring utilities (buyers) to
contract for 85 percent of their customer requirement for power in advance of
when it's needed.

The lack of adequate forward contracting also adds to an operational problem
facing the ISO -- the fact that 20-30 percent of total consumption is
frequently bought and sold in the ISO's Real-Time Market, which was designed
to handle only five percent of the electricity traded in wholesale markets.
This problem -- known as under-scheduling -- is also addressed in the ISO's
filing by a real-time trading charge.

``Because of the visibility of the ISO's markets -- the fact that we are so
public -- and as a result of the distortion of the intended market design,
the ISO has been called upon to take on responsibilities it was never
intended to handle,'' said Winter. ``This proposal would take the ISO back to
its original mission of operating the markets of last resort, allowing ISO
operators to focus on maintaining reliability of the power grid.''

The California ISO is chartered by the state to manage the flow of
electricity along the long-distance, high-voltage power lines that make up
the bulk of California's transmission systems. The not-for-profit public
benefit corporation assumed the responsibility in March 1998 when California
opened its energy markets to competition and the state's investor-owned
utilities turned their private transmission power lines over the California
ISO to manage. The mission of the California ISO is to safeguard the reliable
delivery of electricity and ensure equal access to an open-market electron
highway that spans 12,500 circuit miles.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Contact:

California ISO
Patrick Dorinson, 888/516-NEWS


The recipient of the 2000 Chairman's Award has been selected.  Read all about
it!

Also in this issue:
German gas monopolies
Emissions trading
Enron's status as market maker with NordPool
Trading satellite capacity

It's all in the latest eBiz.  Go to home.enron.com, click Publications, then
click eBiz, and "eBiz November 17, 2000."


Tracy Ngo, Melissa Murphy, Kim Theriot, me
to discuss financial power trading counterparties.
Please ask Tracy if Ed Sacks or anyone else from credit should be included.


As discussed,  please see the attached GISB draft for discussion purposes.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Thank you for the information.

Talk with you soon!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Penman, Gregg
Sent:	Thursday, November 15, 2001 8:06 AM
To:	Mims, Patrice L.
Subject:	Nipsco

You may already know this, but I heard from guys at Nipsco that they did their first nom on Vector yesterday.  Also, Border interconnect expected Dec. 15th.  The heater hit a bridge so they are trying to do some field repairs. Not much else to report.


Laura


I've taken an additional whack. The document still needs some help
(simplification?) relative to the payment mechanics on exercise of the put or
call option. Let's talk tomorrow.

Regards,

Ben


Dear Mr. Kaminski,
?
I will forward my resume. I am looking for a  trading position. I have three
years of market-making experience in illiquid  markets, which I beleive is
highly relevant. But it seems now that getting out  of my contract is not an
alternative anymore.? I learned yesterday that my  firm finally decided to
grant me what I wanted... a new desk. Sometimes I feel  that when you become
a trader you come to trade everything, including your  career.
?
?I thank you for your time and  consideration.
?
Pierre
?
?


Karen:
See highlited section of story below.  PG&E's got it right.  Recall that DWR
was only buying power that it determined was "priced reasonably."
Consequently, the net short wasn't getting picked up.  That meant that the
ISO would have to go to the real-time market to close the gap.  The ISO would
then charge the utilities for the power purchased.  Recall that Bob Glynn
referenced the $300 MM/month that continued to pile up on PG&E's balance
sheet as one of the several reasons that PG&E put itself into bankruptcy.
Now that PG&E's in bankruptcy, the state is now responsible for the full net
short, and can't continue to sluff it off onto PG&E's balance sheet.  So it's
therefore no surprise that the State's daily bill for power purchases has
increased dramatically---just not for any of the bogus reasons cited by
Governor Backbone.

Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 04/20/2001 12:31 PM -----

	Ray Alvarez
	04/20/2001 09:56 AM

		 To: Steve Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Alan
Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Leslie Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron, Rebecca W
Cantrell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: CA legislature in doubt

FYI.  Ray

NGI's Daily Gas Price Index
published : April 20, 2001
CA Governor, Regulators Push on, but Legislature Raises Doubts
Two certainties prevailed in California's blighted energy landscape Thursday:
wholesale power bills are getting bigger and state regulators are trying
harder to salvage Gov. Gray Davis' deal with Southern California Edison Co.
But in the state legislature from which the ultimate solutions must come
there was growing skepticism, despite a series of meetings with the governor
earlier in the week.
While nervousness over the state's electricity bill and the prospect of
insufficient power supplies this summer prevailed, Davis met with 25 members
of California's congressional delegation at a Los Angeles airport hotel to
press his case for federal actions to resolve the seemingly endless energy
dilemma.
The California Public Utilities Commission has ordered a statewide
investigation of the contractual obligations of the almost 700 small
(qualifying facility) QF generators toward the utilities, but most of the
five-member commission's activity was focused outside its regular business
meeting in San Francisco. CPUC President Loretta Lynch offered empathy toward
Edison's financial plight and renewed pleas for federal regulators to provide
wholesale price relief.
"I have committed that the CPUC will expeditiously review those provisions of
(Edison's proposed agreement) that require CPUC resolution, and I have taken
steps to begin that process," Lynch said in a prepared statement released
Wednesday. "In the meantime, I commit to reviewing on a priority basis any
and all proposals that promote the financial health of California utilities
and the interests of its consumers."
Davis and some of the CPUC commissioners have been complaining that the cost
of the state's daily purchases of wholesale power on the spot market have
increased from about $50 million to more than $70 million daily since the
April 6 bankruptcy filing of Pacific Gas and Electric Co., but the utility
challenged the conclusion that the court filing caused the latest price
increases.
"While it is understandable, even laudable, that the governor would want to
fully explain the downsides of utility bankruptcy, this claim is simply not
accurate," said PG&E utility spokesperson John Nelson. He argued that the
increase in state payments for power reflect that the state water resources
department (DWR) now is covering all spot purchases, including the often
costly real-time emergency purchases by the state's transmission grid
operator, Cal-ISO.
Thus, PG&E's spokesperson said the more likely cause of the increased power
bill lies with recent moves by federal regulators and Cal-ISO, noting that
the state grid operator should only sell to "creditworthy" entities. These
moves were done independent of the PG&E bankruptcy filing, Nelson said.
As the daily bill for power goes up, draining the state treasury more
quickly, pressure mounts for a resolution to the utility financial situation.
But the legislature has expressed skepticism toward the governor's proposed
deal with Edison. State Senate Leader John Burton (D-San Francisco) told news
media Wednesday that bankruptcy might be the best approach for Edison.
In adopting the new investigations of QF generators, the CPUC's commissioners
acknowledged that eventually the issue of back payments to the small
generators needs to be addressed, particularly to a group representing up to
3,000 MW collectively.


I am waiting for an answer back from Elizabeth, but was wondering if you or any of your contacts might know the answer to the following.

Thanks,
Stacey
-----Original Message-----
From: White, Stacey W.
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 6:06 PM
To: Sager, Elizabeth
Subject: RE: Non-terminated Power Transactions

One question:  I had Melissa Murphy put together the termination dates for each of the counterparties and was wondering if you could clarify something for me.  If a termination date is 12/4/2001, do I move 12/4 forward to the bankrupt book or do I move 12/5 forward to the bankrupt book?

Thanks,
Stacey

-----Original Message-----
From: Sager, Elizabeth
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 8:39 PM
To: White, Stacey W.
Subject: RE: Non-terminated Power Transactions

Thanks Stacey for all the hard work in putting this together- this list is great.  I  met with the East group today and the West group on Tuesday to review.  We may have questions but  .... thanks again.

-----Original Message-----
From: White, Stacey W.
Sent: Sun 12/9/2001 4:30 PM
To: Sager, Elizabeth; St. Clair, Carol; Bradford, William S.; Fallon, Jim
Cc: Postlethwaite, John; Evans, Casey
Subject: Non-terminated Power Transactions

The following spreadsheet is a consolidation of counterparties that have not turned in termination letters.  I have also attached the list of terminations so that you can see the list we used.  If there are other counterparties that you know of that have not appeared on these lists, let me know and we will move them to the 'Bankruptcy Portfolio' we have set up.

<<Non-Terminated Counterparties as of 12-7-2001.xls>> <<Financial Power Terminated.xls>> <<Physical Power Terminated.xls>>

Please let me know what other details you need and we will be happy to provide.

Thanks,
Stacey White
Director Power Risk Management
713-853-1870


Eric and Charlie,

I just wanted to let you know we met with Jean.  We determined an initial
value and John is contacting Entergy today.

Thanks for all of your help.

Sarah


I agree with Kevin, the real issue always turns out to be wrapped around a
definition of safety, reliability .....etc; that is defined by the utility.
Even now in deregulated markets they act as if they are in competition with
the DG owners (in some ways they are in competition because the KWH that is
produced and used on site may not be producing T & D revenue for the
utility). Without a real standard that defines a framework for a technical
solution, we will always struggle with this issue.

Kevin Duggan
<kduggan@capstonetu        To:     'Steven Greenberg'
<sgreenberg@realenergy.com>, "'A. J.
rbine.com>                 \"Tony\" Occhionero (E-mail)'"
<tocchionero@agcc.org>, "'Aaron
Thomas (E-mail)'" <athomas@newenergy.com>, "'AI Figueroa (E-mail)'"
06/11/2001 07:49 PM        <al_figueroa@vflet.com>, "'Angelina Galiteva
(E-mail)'"
<agalit@ladwp.com>, "'Beth Dunlop (E-mail)'"
<BDunlop@gralegal.com>, "'Bill Brooks (E-mail)'"
<billb@endecon.com>, "'Beth Dunlop (E-mail)'"
<BDunlop@gralegal.com>, "'Bill Morrow (E-mail)'"
<senator.morrow@sen.ca.gov>, "'Bob Wichert (E-mail)'"
<wichert@fuelcells.org>, "'Cameron \"Mac\" Moore (E-mail)'"
<moorecm@bp.com>, "'Carl Lower (E-mail) (E-mail)'"
<clower@earthlink.net>, "'Charles Budd (E-mail)'"
<charles.r.budd@ucm.com>, "'Charles T. Halnan (E-mail)'"
<CHALNAN@NS.NET>, "'Cris Cooley (E-mail)'" <crisman@west.net>, "'D.
J. Smith (E-mail)'" <djsmith@smithandkempton.com>, "'Daniel J.
Dessanti (E-mail)'" <ddessanti@keyspanenergy.com>, "'Daniel S.
Shugar P.E. (E-mail)'" <dshugar@powerlight.com>, "'David H. Lesser
(E-mail)'" <hbp1@email.msn.com>, "'David Palmer (E-mail)'"
<dpalmer@endecogroup.com>, "'David Townley (E-mail)'"
<dtownley@newenergy.com>, "'Dennis L. Randall Jr. (E-mail)'"
<dennis.randall@opuswest.com>, "'Dian Grueneich (E-mail) (E-mail)'"
<dgrueneich@gralegal.com>, "'Diane I. Fellman (E-mail)'"
<difellman@energy-law-group.com>, "'Dick Cartwright (E-mail)'"
<rlcart@earthlink.net>, "'Dominic DiMare (E-mail)'"
<dominic.dimare@calchamber.com>, "'Dorothy Rothrock (E-mail)'"
<drothrock@camfg.com>, "'Duane Lappinga P.E. (E-mail)'"
<DLappi@Ardenrealty.com>, "'Eloy Z. Garcia (E-mail)'"
<egarcia@ka-pow.com>, "'Eric R. Wong (E-mail)'"
<erwong@worldnet.att.net>, "'Eric Wong (E-mail)'"
<erwon@worldnet.att.net>, "'Frank Duesel (E-mail)'"
<dueselfr@nmenergy.com>, "'Frank Frankini (E-mail)'"
<frank_frankini@equityoffice.com>, "'G. Paul Horst (E-mail)'"
<horstg@dteenergy.com>, "'Ganesh Ananthasubramaniam (E-mail)'"
<ananthasubramaniamg@dteenergy.com>, "'Geoffry Ayers (E-mail)'"
<gayres@socalgas.com>, "'Henry Mak (E-mail)'" <hmak@socalqds.com>,
"'James A. Westbrook (E-mail)'" <jaw@wei-air.com>, "'James Gariepy
(E-mail)'" <gariepyj@dteenergy.com>, "'Jay Morse (E-mail)
(E-mail)'" <jxm@cpuc.ca.gov>, "'Jayme Murray Chick (E-mail)'"
<jayme.murray@sen.ca.gov>, "'Jayme Chick (E-mail)'"
<jayme.murray@sen.ca.gov>, "'Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)'"
<Jeff_Dasovich@enron.com>, "'Jim DiCarlo (E-mail)'"
<nextek1@msn.com>, "'Jim Trudeau (E-mail)'"
<James_Trudeau@enron.com>, "'John W. Jimison (E-mail)'"
<johnj@bcjlaw.com>, "'John White (E-mail)'" <vjw@cleanpower.org>,
"'Julie Spezia (E-mail)'" <jaspezia@aol.com>, "'Karen Lindh
(E-mail)'" <karen@klindh.com>, "'Leslie S. Spahnn (E-mail)'"
<spahnn@hnks.com>, "'Tim Charters (E-mail)'"
<tim.charters@mail.house.gov>, "'Tom R. Casten (E-mail)'"
<Trcasten@aol.com>, "'Aaron Thomas (E-mail)'"
<athomas@newenergy.com>, "Andy Brown (E-mail) (E-mail)"
<abb@eslawfirm.com>, "Bob Miller (E-mail)" <bmiller@hess.com>,
"Cameron \"Mac\" Moore (E-mail)" <moorecm@bp.com>, "'Carl C. Lower
(E-mail)'" <clower@earthlink.net>, "Daniel J. Dessanti (E-mail)"
<ddessanti@keyspanenergy.com>, "'Dorothy E. Rothrock (E-mail)'"
<rothrock@ix.netcom.com>, "Douglas Grandy (E-mail)"
<doug.grandy@dgs.ca.gov>, "'Eric R. Wong (E-mail)'"
<erwong@worldnet.att.net>, "'Gary C. Matteson (E-mail)'"
<gary.matteson@ucop.edu>, "Greg Husebye (E-mail)"
<GHuseb@Ardenrealty.com>, hfinken@ect.enron.com,
hmertens@energy.twc.com, "Jeffrey R. Jacobson (E-mail)"
<jeff.jacobson@swgas.com>, jna@olywa.net, "Jonathan M. Teague
(E-mail)" <jonathan.teague@dgs.ca.gov>, "Kari Smith (E-mail)"
<ksmith@powerlight.com>, Kevin Duggan
<kduggan@capstoneturbine.com>, "'Linda Sherif (E-mail)'"
<lys@aelaw.com>, "Mark J. Skowronski (E-mail)"
<mark.skowronski@honeywell.com>, "Nick Cimino (E-mail)"
<nick.cimino@dgs.ca.gov>, "'Patrick S. McLafferty (E-mail)'"
<nextek3@msn.com>, "'Paul H. Eichenberger P.E. (E-mail)'"
<peichenberger@fce.com>, "RobertWichert (E-mail)"
<wichert@fuelcells.org>, steven.bloch@honeywell.com, "'Ted J.
Bischak (E-mail)'" <tbischak@cwpla.com>, todoc1@aol.com
cc:     Rachel Paul <rpaul@realenergy.com>, Dan Cashdan
<dcashdan@realenergy.com>, "'David Goldstein (E-mail)'"
<dgoldstein@nrdc.org>
Subject:     RE: Committee on Ways and Means

1045 as drafted will not result in a national interconnection standard.  It
simply requires the utilities to interconnect a DG unit if it meets the
"Rules"  The "Rule" as drafted relate to the safety, reliability and power
quality of the DG facility, not to the establishment of national
interconnection standards.  As currently worded, the bill could do
unintended harm to DG.

I would suggest that any expression of support for 1045 be conditional on a
change in the wording of the "Rule"  as follows

"Within one year after the date of enactment of this section, the
Commission
shall promulgate a final rule to establish safety, reliability, and power
quality standards relating to the interconnection of distributed
generation...."

Regards
Kevin Duggan
Capstone Turbine Corporation
Phone: (818) 734-5455
Fax: (818) 734-5385
Web: www.microturbine.com

-----Original Message-----
From:           Steven Greenberg [mailto:sgreenberg@realenergy.com]
Sent:           Monday, June 11, 2001 4:42 PM
To:        'A. J. "Tony" Occhionero (E-mail)'; 'Aaron Thomas (E-mail)'; 'AI
Figueroa (E-mail)'; 'Angelina Galiteva (E-mail)'; 'Beth Dunlop (E-mail)';
'Bill Brooks (E-mail)'; 'Beth Dunlop (E-mail)'; 'Bill Morrow (E-mail)';
'Bob
Wichert (E-mail)'; 'Cameron "Mac" Moore (E-mail)'; 'Carl Lower (E-mail)
(E-mail)'; 'Charles Budd (E-mail)'; 'Charles T. Halnan (E-mail)'; 'Cris
Cooley (E-mail)'; 'D. J. Smith (E-mail)'; 'Daniel J. Dessanti (E-mail)';
'Daniel S. Shugar P.E. (E-mail)'; 'David H. Lesser (E-mail)'; 'David Palmer
(E-mail)'; 'David Townley (E-mail)'; 'Dennis L. Randall Jr. (E-mail)';
'Dian
Grueneich (E-mail) (E-mail)'; 'Diane I. Fellman (E-mail)'; 'Dick Cartwright
(E-mail)'; 'Dominic DiMare (E-mail)'; 'Dorothy Rothrock (E-mail)'; 'Duane
Lappinga P.E. (E-mail)'; 'Eloy Z. Garcia (E-mail)'; 'Eric R. Wong
(E-mail)';
'Eric Wong (E-mail)'; 'Frank Duesel (E-mail)'; 'Frank Frankini (E-mail)';
'G. Paul Horst (E-mail)'; 'Ganesh Ananthasubramaniam (E-mail)'; 'Geoffry
Ayers (E-mail)'; 'Henry Mak (E-mail)'; 'James A. Westbrook (E-mail)';
'James
Gariepy (E-mail)'; 'Jay Morse (E-mail) (E-mail)'; 'Jayme Murray Chick
(E-mail)'; 'Jayme Chick (E-mail)'; 'Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)'; 'Jim DiCarlo
(E-mail)'; 'Jim Trudeau (E-mail)'; 'John W. Jimison (E-mail)'; 'John White
(E-mail)'; 'Julie Spezia (E-mail)'; 'Karen Lindh (E-mail)'; 'Leslie S.
Spahnn (E-mail)'; 'Tim Charters (E-mail)'; 'Tom R. Casten (E-mail)'; 'Aaron
Thomas (E-mail)'; Andy Brown (E-mail) (E-mail); Bob Miller (E-mail);
Cameron
"Mac" Moore (E-mail); 'Carl C. Lower (E-mail)'; Daniel J. Dessanti
(E-mail);
'Dorothy E. Rothrock (E-mail)'; Douglas Grandy (E-mail); 'Eric R. Wong
(E-mail)'; 'Gary C. Matteson (E-mail)'; Greg Husebye (E-mail);
hfinken@ect.enron.com; hmertens@energy.twc.com; Jeffrey R. Jacobson
(E-mail); jna@olywa.net; Jonathan M. Teague (E-mail); Kari Smith (E-mail);
Kevin Duggan (E-mail); 'Linda Sherif (E-mail)'; Mark J. Skowronski
(E-mail);
Nick Cimino (E-mail); 'Patrick S. McLafferty (E-mail)'; 'Paul H.
Eichenberger P.E. (E-mail)'; RobertWichert (E-mail);
steven.bloch@honeywell.com; 'Ted J. Bischak (E-mail)'; todoc1@aol.com
Cc:        Rachel Paul; Dan Cashdan; 'David Goldstein (E-mail)'
Subject:        FW: Committee on Ways and Means
Importance:          High

<< File: Committee on Ways and Means.doc >> << File: HR 788 & 1045 Support
Letter.doc >> << File: HR 1045 ISSA and Wilson Bill.pdf >> << File: HR
778.pdf >> Please fax a support letter (draft letter attached) to the
Members of the
Ways and Means Committee as well as the authors, HR 778 Cunningham, and HR
1045 Wilson and Issa.  These are important measures that 1) recognize CHP
in
buildings as an energy efficiency measure and create valuable tax
incentives
for DER among other things. There will hearings on these bills in Ways and
Means on Tue and Wed June 12 and 13.  Please call if you have any
questions.

Steven A. Greenberg

Sr. Energy Officer
RealEnergy, Inc.
300 Capitol Mall, Suite 120
Sacramento, CA  95814

916-325-2500
916-325-0451 fax

www.realenergy.com

This electronic mail transmission contains confidential information
intended
only for the person(s) named.  Any use, distribution, copying, or
disclosure
by any other person is strictly prohibited.  If you received this
transmission in error, please notify the sender by telephone at
(310)277-7000 or send an electronic mail message to
postmaster@realenergy.com.


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 09/27/2000
03:13 PM ---------------------------

Shirley Crenshaw
09/27/2000 11:29 AM
To: "John D. Martin" <J_Martin@baylor.edu> @ ENRON
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Vince Kaminski's Itinerary - Week of 9/30 - 10/7/00

Professor Martin:

Attached is Vince's itinerary.  Let me know if you need anything else.

---------------------- Forwarded by Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT on 09/27/2000
11:24 AM ---------------------------

Vince J Kaminski
09/27/2000 10:45 AM
To: "John D. Martin" <J_Martin@baylor.edu> @ ENRON
cc: Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Hello Vince

John,

I shall be in Paris and London next week. We can schedule a call sometimes
next week. I shall ask my assistant to send you my itinerary. A late call
(Paris time)
would work for me. The time difference is 6 hours. This would mean a call
sometimes around 3 - 4 p.m. our time.

Please, indicate which day works best for you.

Vince

"John D. Martin" <J_Martin@baylor.edu> on 09/27/2000 09:45:50 AM
To: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Re: Hello Vince

Vince,

Good morning.  Unfortunately I'll be in Milwaukee visiting Harley-Davidson
about a book revision project both Thursday and Friday.  How about early
next week.  I appreciate your patience with me.  When you suggested a time
last week I was "unprepared" and embarassed to call and expose my
ignorance.  Since then I have re-read the Enron Gas Services case and have
a pretty good feel for how you guys have melded the physical and financial
sides of the business.  The other theme that I have heard many Enron
speakers use is the "de-regulation" of markets.  This certainly played a
factor in the power business and presumeably was behind the water business.

If you'll let me know when it's convenient to call next week I'll have some
notes put together.  I'm teaching a class for a colleague on Monday so
anytime after that is great.

Thanks and hope you had a pleasant trip.

John

p.s.  I saw that the Univ of New Orleans has an Energy Finance endowed
chair for a financial economist open.  If you ever decide to move back to
the life of poverty of an academic I would love to recommend you for such a
post.

At 08:26 AM 9/27/00 -0500, you wrote:
>
>John,
>
>What about Thursday, 10:30 a.m.? I have just come back from Europe
>last night and I am trying to organize my schedule for the next few days.
>
>My phone number is 713 853 3848.
>
>
>Vince
>
>
>
>
>
>
>"John D. Martin" <J_Martin@baylor.edu> on 09/22/2000 01:57:47 PM
>
>To:   vkamins@enron.com
>cc:
>Subject:  Hello Vince
>
>
>Vince,
>
>Can I call you Tuesday morning about our writing project?  I have to be in
>Austin for a dental appointment on Monday at noon and that will probably
>wipe out the day.  Give me a time and number where I can reach you.
>
>John
>
>
>John D. Martin
>Carr P. Collins Chair in Finance
>Finance Department
>Baylor University
>PO Box 98004
>Waco, TX 76798
>254-710-4473 (Office)
>254-710-1092 (Fax)
>J_Martin@Baylor.edu
>web:    http://hsb.baylor.edu/html/martinj/home.html
>
>
>
>
John D. Martin
Carr P. Collins Chair in Finance
Finance Department
Baylor University
PO Box 98004
Waco, TX 76798
254-710-4473 (Office)
254-710-1092 (Fax)
J_Martin@Baylor.edu
web:    http://hsb.baylor.edu/html/martinj/home.html


FYI...place holder for the launch.

Dan
---------------------- Forwarded by Daniel Diamond/HOU/ECT on 06/07/2000
05:57 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Ed Quinn                           06/02/2000 09:46 AM

To: Daniel Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: MAy 22nd Newsletter

---------------------- Forwarded by Ed Quinn/HOU/ECT on 06/02/2000 09:46 AM
---------------------------

"Boettcher, Tom J." <TJBOETTC@GAPAC.com> on 05/24/2000 10:31:24 AM
To: "'Ed Quinn (Enron)'" <ed.quinn@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: FW: MAy 22nd Newsletter

Now we are quoting Children's stories ... by the way ... one of my
favorites.

> ----------
> From:  Vickie Lopez[SMTP:Vickie.Lopez@enron.com]
> Sent:  Wednesday, May 24, 2000 10:58 AM
> To:  Dora Trevino; Jay Epstein; Cheryl Kaiser; Stephen Klein; Rebecca
> Skupin; Andrew R Conner; Kimberly Bullock; Tom Bruce-Jones; Fraser Allen;
> Martin Holmes; John Jacobsen; Kellie Metcalf; Robert E Anderson; Greg
> Bruch; Elliot Bonner; Kevin Cordesman; Bob Crane; Chris Croom; Joe Jure;
> Steve Kim; Roy Lipsett; Lisa Berg Carver; Michael Moulton; Edward Ondarza;
> Ed Quinn; Richard T Robinson; Scott M Shields; Dusty Warren Paez; Glenn
> Connors; Steven Kleege
> Subject:  MAy 22nd Newsletter
>
>  <<Mac Word 3.0>>
>
>
> (See attached file: May 22 nd Newsletter.doc)
>

 - May 22 nd Newsletter.doc


Here is the list updated with responsibility names.


---------------------- Forwarded by Amy Fabian/Corp/Enron on 05/22/2000 04:27
PM ---------------------------

Sally Painter <SPainter@fontheiminternational.com>@fontheiminternational.com>
on 05/22/2000 05:30:42 PM
Sent by: Rhonda Russell <RRussell@fontheiminternational.com>
To: "'Amy, Enron'" <amy.fabian@enron.com>, "'Amy, Enron'"
<amy.fabian@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: e-mails to be forwarded to Steve Kean

Amy, thanks for all of your help!

 <<FW: Gore2000 TPs: Social Security, South Africa, the NRA and Bush's
leadership>>  <<FW: Gore2000 TPs: Bush's SS plan hurts women>>  <<Read:
Today's Post Story About Gore Campaign>>  <<RE: Gore2000 TPs: Bush's
Secret Plan for Social Security Revealed!>>  <<FW: Gore2000 TPs: Bush's
Secret Plan for Social Security Revealed!>>

________________________________________________________________________
_
Rhonda Russell
Fontheim International. LLC
601 Thirteenth Street NW
Suite 1100North
Washington, DC 20005
202.879-5821

Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <13EB2E1A97CAD311BB9200508B8FA56E04CE41@FONTHEIM_SERVER>
From: Sally Painter <SPainter@fontheiminternational.com>
To: Rhonda Russell <RRussell@fontheiminternational.com>
Subject: FW: Gore2000 TPs: Social Security, South Africa, the NRA and Bush 's
leadership
Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 13:11:23 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.1960.3)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Dear All,

Please let me know if you find these useful or would prefer that I
screen for content.  Thanks.

Best,

Sally

Gore2000 Talking Points
Monday, May 22, 2000

?    Gore focuses on Social Security
?    Gore meets with South African President Thabo Mbeki
?    The NRA guns for the presidency
?    Houston Chronicle columnist Donald Kaul on Bush's Texas Leadership

GORE FOCUSES ON SOCIAL SECURITY, CHINA TRADE

Speaking in Washington today, Al Gore called for Social Security reform
that preserves the basic guarantee of retirement security.  The Gore
plan
will keep Social Security solvent through at least 2050, while Bush is
pushing a risky privatization scheme.  Under the Bush plan, poor
investment
choices by some individuals or a downturn in the stock market could
force
taxpayers to bailout those who lost money.

GORE MEETS WITH SOUTH AFRICAN PRESIDENT THABO MBEKI

At a State Department luncheon, Al Gore met with South African President
Thabo Mbeki to discuss trade, the AIDS epidemic, and other concerns with
the African subcontinent.  Gore has proposed strengthening economic
engagement with Africa, which will lead to greater prosperity and
international security.

George Bush, however, takes a dim view of Africa, stating Africa
"doesn't
fit into the national strategic interests, as far as I can seen them."
[PBS
"NewsHour" 2/16/00]

THE NRA GUNS FOR THE PRESIDENCY

Meeting in Charlotte this weekend, Charlton Heston fired up the faithful
with fear and belligerence, telling Al Gore and other "divisive forces"
(gun safety advocates) that they could have his guns when they take them
"from my cold dead hands."

Wayne LaPierre, NRA Executive VP, attacked the Million Mom March,
instead
calling last week's rally of concerned parents, the "Misled Mom March."

Reaffirming that Governor Bush is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the NRA,
top
officials declared they would throw all of the group's resources behind
the
Texas Governor.

HOUSTON CHRONICLE QUESTIONS BUSH'S LEADERSHIP

On Saturday, Houston Chronicle columnist Donald Kaul questioned Bush's
leadership, explaining "he has spent his life being rescued for his
family's rich friends from one failed business deal after another."

Among Kaul's criticisms of Mr. Bush:

Texas ranks near the tops of the charts in every bad category:
?    poverty rates, teen pregnancies, people without insurance, air
pollution, executions
Texas ranks near the bottom in all the good categories:
?    the environment, public health, parks and recreation, highways and
support for the arts

The one place where Bush has shown leadership is in working tirelessly
to
cut state taxes of the well-to-do.
?    He has protected the oil refiners which dump 1 million tons of
pollution into the Texas air annually
?    He pushed a $1.2 billion property tax cut, despite the fact that
Texas
schools are starved for cash

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I Support Al Gore for President!
http://www.algore2000.com
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Paid for by Gore 2000, Inc., Nashville, TN 37203.
Contributions to Gore 2000, Inc. are not tax deductible for Federal
income
tax purposes.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I Support Al Gore for President!
http://www.algore2000.com
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Paid for by Gore 2000, Inc., Nashville, TN 37203.
Contributions to Gore 2000, Inc. are not tax deductible for Federal
income
tax purposes.
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <13EB2E1A97CAD311BB9200508B8FA56E04CE32@FONTHEIM_SERVER>
From: Sally Painter <SPainter@fontheiminternational.com>
To: Rhonda Russell <RRussell@fontheiminternational.com>
Subject: FW: Gore2000 TPs: Bush's SS plan hurts women
Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 17:58:26 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.1960.3)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Dear all,

FYI

Gore 2000 Talking Points
Thursday, May 18, 2000

?    Bush's Social Security plan would hurt women
?    Required Reading: NYT Herbert ? "Are You Feeling Lucky?"

BUSH'S SOCIAL SECURITY PLAN WOULD HURT WOMEN

?    Women Would Be the "Largest Group of Losers" Under Privatization.
John Mueller, the Senior Vice President and Chief Economist of Lehrman
Bell
Mueller Cannon, Inc. and former adviser to Rep. Jack Kemp, testified
before
the House Social Security Subcommittee that "the largest group of losers
from 'privatizing' Social Security would be women.  This is true for
women
in all birth-years, all kinds of marital status, all kinds of
labor-market
behavior, and all income levels."

?    Privatization Plans Exacerbate the Already Unequal Distribution of
Retirement Benefits.  According to the statement of Jane Ross, Director
of
Income Security issues at the U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO),
Social
Security reform plans that incorporate private accounts exacerbate the
already unequal distribution of retirement benefits under Social
Security.
["Social Security Reform: Implications for the Financial Well-Being of
Women," Statement of Jane L. Ross, GAO, 4/10/97]

?    Privatization Plans a Threat to Women's Long-Term Security.
Privatization would transform today's  guaranteed retirement benefits
into
a risky program that could threaten women's retirement security, since
women are more likely to rely on Social Security for their primary
source
of retirement benefits.

?    Women rely on Social Security because
(1)  half of all women work in jobs that don't offer pensions;
(2)  women retirees with pensions receive half the average pensions
benefits that men collect;
(3)  nearly three out of four women earn less than $30,000 a year. Women
&
Retirement Security: An Overview," WISER,
     3/10/00, "Viewpoint: Legislative Agenda for the 106th Congress,
"Social Security Privatization," National Committee to
     Preserve Social Security and Medicare, "Women and Retirement
Security," www.ssa.gov]

HERBERT FROM TODAY'S NYT: DO YOU FEEL LUCKY?

Bob Herbert today deconstructed the various arguments for why Bush's
privatization scheme is too risky.

1) Even his chief economic advisor doesn't trust the market:

"Mr. Lindsey, who strongly favors Mr. Bush's proposed $1.3 trillion tax
cut
and argues that it would provide a needed economic stimulus, has warned
his
private clients of a potential stock market tailspin that could lead to
a
recession. He said he sold his own stocks about two years ago so he
would
be able "to sleep at night."

Mr. Bush told the nation that the key to saving Social Security
retirement
benefits was to allow working Americans to invest a portion of their
Social
Security taxes in the very same stock market that Mr. Lindsey, at the
moment, wants no part of."

2) Herbert also questioned Bush's motives, noting that Bush's Wall
Street
contributors would make out like bandits under his plan.

"There is, however, a group of guaranteed winners under Mr. Bush's plan
--
the movers and shakers at the big brokerage houses who have been
funneling
many millions of dollars into the campaign coffers of Mr. Bush and other
politicians, just begging them to steer some of the hundreds of billions
of
dollars in Social Security taxes their way.

Everyone who sells stocks or mutual funds stands to benefit from this
welfare scheme for the not-so-idle rich.

3) He explained the chronology of Republicans trying to do away with
Social
Security

"Face it, the Republicans have had it in for Social Security since its
inception. The historian William Manchester wrote about the G.O.P.'s
desperate efforts in 1936 to block its creation: "On radio spots, actors
hired by the Republican National Committee revealed in shocked tones
that
each man would be given a number -- as though there were any other way
to
keep track of Social Security accounts -- and perpetrated the hoax that
people would be fingerprinted."

When the Republicans won control of Congress in 1946, party leaders
called
for the repeal of Social Security. And nearly four decades later,
Governor
Bush's fellow Texan, Senator Phil Gramm, could be quoted as follows on
the
question of eliminating minimum benefits for the elderly:

"They are 80-year-olds. Most people don't have the luxury of living to
be
80 years old, so it's hard for me to feel sorry for them."

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I Support Al Gore for President!
http://www.algore2000.com
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Paid for by Gore 2000, Inc., Nashville, TN 37203.
Contributions to Gore 2000, Inc. are not tax deductible for Federal
income
tax purposes.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I Support Al Gore for President!
http://www.algore2000.com
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Paid for by Gore 2000, Inc., Nashville, TN 37203.
Contributions to Gore 2000, Inc. are not tax deductible for Federal
income
tax purposes.
Message-ID: <13EB2E1A97CAD311BB9200508B8FA56E01C4A3@FONTHEIM_SERVER>
From: Sally Painter <SPainter@fontheiminternational.com>
Subject: Read: Today's Post Story About Gore Campaign
Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 11:24:22 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.1960.3)
Content-Type: text/plain

Your message

  To:      Claude Fontheim; 'David Milenthal'; 'Frank Cipriano'; 'Mark
Goode'; 'Morris Reid'; 'Nancy Kramer'; 'Robert Rosen'; 'Rodney
Ferguson'; Sally Painter; 'Sally Susman'; 'Samuel P. Fried'; 'Scott
Bernstein'; 'Seth Siegel'; 'Simon Rosenberg'; 'Steve Kean'; 'Tom Horton'
  Subject: FW: Today's Post Story About Gore Campaign
  Sent:    Fri, 19 May 2000 11:23:32 -0400

was read on Fri, 19 May 2000 11:24:22 -0400

Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <13EB2E1A97CAD311BB9200508B8FA56E04CE21@FONTHEIM_SERVER>
From: Sally Painter <SPainter@fontheiminternational.com>
To: Rhonda Russell <RRussell@fontheiminternational.com>
Subject: RE: Gore2000 TPs: Bush's Secret Plan for Social Security Revealed !
Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 08:23:28 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.1960.3)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

good stuff there may be one today.

>  -----Original Message-----
> From:  Rhonda Russell
> Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2000 3:56 PM
> To: Claude Fontheim; David Milenthal; Frank Cipriano; Mark Goode;
> Morris Reid; Nancy Kramer; Robert Rosen; Rodney Ferguson; Sally
> Painter; Sally Susman; Samuel P. Fried; Scott Bernstein; Seth Siegel;
> Simon Rosenberg; Steve Kean; Tom Horton
> Subject: FW: Gore2000 TPs: Bush's Secret Plan for Social Security
> Revealed!
>
>
> Dear All,
>
> It was great to see you all at the dinner.  See below.
>
> Best,
>
> Sally Painter
>
>
>
>
> Gore2000 Talking Points
> Wednesday, May 17, 2000
>
> ?    Gore challenges Bush to Social Security debate at AARP conference
> in
> Orlando
> ?    Bush's Secret Plan Revealed!
> ?    Bush continues to face fire over privatization plan
> ?    Middle and low income workers worse-off under Texas alternative
> to
> Social Security
>
> GORE CHALLENGES BUSH TO SOCIAL SECURITY DEBATE AT AARP CONFERENCE IN
> ORLANDO
>
> Addressing approximately 10,000 seniors at the AARP's Biennial
> Convention,
> Al Gore today challenged George W. Bush to hold a debate, "as soon as
> possible," on their competing Social Security proposals. Gore has
> called
> for Social Security reform "based not on stock market speculation, but
> on
> fiscal responsibility and debt reduction." Bush is pushing the partial
> privatization of Social Security, but has provided no specific
> details.
>
> BUSH WOULD COMPLETELY PRIVATIZE  SOCIAL SECURITY
>
> George Bush has revealed that his "secret plan" for Social Security is
> an
> attempt to completely dismantle and privatize the 65-year system of
> social
> insurance, according to reports in the New York Times, the Associated
> Press, and the Houston Chronicle.
>
> The Chronicle reports that "Republican presidential candidate George
> W.
> Bush on Tuesday said his plan to create private savings accounts could
> be
> the first step toward a complete privatization of Social Security."
>
> "It's going to take a while to transition to a system where personal
> savings accounts are the predominant part of the investment vehicle,"
> Bush
> said. "This is a step toward a completely different world, and an
> important
> step."
>
> Bush admits that the individual private accounts are but the first
> step in
> his larger plan to privatize the program.  This may be good for the
> stockbrokers who have poured $3 million into his Presidential
> campaign, but
> it is a horrible deal for America.
>
> BUSH PLAN PANNED IN THE PRESS
>
> Bush's privatization plan has come under fire from responsible
> journalists
> and editorial pages across the country.
>
> A New York Daily News editorial writes:
> "On the future of Social Security, the presidential candidates have
> offered
> stark choices. Bush would destroy the program; Gore would save it.
> Easy
> choice."
>
> Paul Krugman addresses the current concern about the stock market
> being
> overvalued at present:
> "If you think that stocks are currently overpriced, this [the Bush]
> proposal sounds like a recipe for disaster: it will encourage workers
> to
> buy stocks at exactly the wrong time -- eventually leading to an even
> worse
> Social Security crisis, as the government finds itself under intense
> pressure to bail out the baby boomers."
>
> TEXAS ALTERNATIVE TO SOCIAL SECURITY HURTS RETIREES
>
> The Baltimore Sun today revealed that three Texas counties which opted
> out
> of the Social Security system in the early 1980s in favor of private
> investments.  According to the Sun, many of the counties' 3,000
> employees ?
> especially low- to middle-income workers ? will actually earn less
> money
> than if they had stuck with Social Security.
>
> While wealthier workers might have done better under privatization,
> middle
> and low-wage workers did significantly worse.  According to a GAO
> report, a
> low-wage County employee working for 35 years would earn $1,125 a
> month
> under Social Security, but as little as $542 under the privatized
> plan.
>
> So much for Bush's plan to help poorer Americans.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> I Support Al Gore for President!
> http://www.algore2000.com
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
>
> Paid for by Gore 2000, Inc., Nashville, TN 37203.
> Contributions to Gore 2000, Inc. are not tax deductible for Federal
> income
> tax purposes.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> I Support Al Gore for President!
> http://www.algore2000.com
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
>
> Paid for by Gore 2000, Inc., Nashville, TN 37203.
> Contributions to Gore 2000, Inc. are not tax deductible for Federal
> income
> tax purposes.
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <13EB2E1A97CAD311BB9200508B8FA56E04CE1D@FONTHEIM_SERVER>
From: Sally Painter <SPainter@fontheiminternational.com>
To: Rhonda Russell <RRussell@fontheiminternational.com>
Subject: FW: Gore2000 TPs: Bush's Secret Plan for Social Security Revealed !
Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 14:26:01 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.1960.3)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Dear All,

It was great to see you all at the dinner.  See below.

Best,

Sally Painter

Gore2000 Talking Points
Wednesday, May 17, 2000

?    Gore challenges Bush to Social Security debate at AARP conference
in
Orlando
?    Bush's Secret Plan Revealed!
?    Bush continues to face fire over privatization plan
?    Middle and low income workers worse-off under Texas alternative to
Social Security

GORE CHALLENGES BUSH TO SOCIAL SECURITY DEBATE AT AARP CONFERENCE IN
ORLANDO

Addressing approximately 10,000 seniors at the AARP's Biennial
Convention,
Al Gore today challenged George W. Bush to hold a debate, "as soon as
possible," on their competing Social Security proposals. Gore has called
for Social Security reform "based not on stock market speculation, but
on
fiscal responsibility and debt reduction." Bush is pushing the partial
privatization of Social Security, but has provided no specific details.

BUSH WOULD COMPLETELY PRIVATIZE  SOCIAL SECURITY

George Bush has revealed that his "secret plan" for Social Security is
an
attempt to completely dismantle and privatize the 65-year system of
social
insurance, according to reports in the New York Times, the Associated
Press, and the Houston Chronicle.

The Chronicle reports that "Republican presidential candidate George W.
Bush on Tuesday said his plan to create private savings accounts could
be
the first step toward a complete privatization of Social Security."

"It's going to take a while to transition to a system where personal
savings accounts are the predominant part of the investment vehicle,"
Bush
said. "This is a step toward a completely different world, and an
important
step."

Bush admits that the individual private accounts are but the first step
in
his larger plan to privatize the program.  This may be good for the
stockbrokers who have poured $3 million into his Presidential campaign,
but
it is a horrible deal for America.

BUSH PLAN PANNED IN THE PRESS

Bush's privatization plan has come under fire from responsible
journalists
and editorial pages across the country.

A New York Daily News editorial writes:
"On the future of Social Security, the presidential candidates have
offered
stark choices. Bush would destroy the program; Gore would save it. Easy
choice."

Paul Krugman addresses the current concern about the stock market being
overvalued at present:
"If you think that stocks are currently overpriced, this [the Bush]
proposal sounds like a recipe for disaster: it will encourage workers to
buy stocks at exactly the wrong time -- eventually leading to an even
worse
Social Security crisis, as the government finds itself under intense
pressure to bail out the baby boomers."

TEXAS ALTERNATIVE TO SOCIAL SECURITY HURTS RETIREES

The Baltimore Sun today revealed that three Texas counties which opted
out
of the Social Security system in the early 1980s in favor of private
investments.  According to the Sun, many of the counties' 3,000
employees ?
especially low- to middle-income workers ? will actually earn less money
than if they had stuck with Social Security.

While wealthier workers might have done better under privatization,
middle
and low-wage workers did significantly worse.  According to a GAO
report, a
low-wage County employee working for 35 years would earn $1,125 a month
under Social Security, but as little as $542 under the privatized plan.

So much for Bush's plan to help poorer Americans.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I Support Al Gore for President!
http://www.algore2000.com
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Paid for by Gore 2000, Inc., Nashville, TN 37203.
Contributions to Gore 2000, Inc. are not tax deductible for Federal
income
tax purposes.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I Support Al Gore for President!
http://www.algore2000.com
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Paid for by Gore 2000, Inc., Nashville, TN 37203.
Contributions to Gore 2000, Inc. are not tax deductible for Federal
income
tax purposes.


- 1_Amendments for ABX-18 - version 1-30-01.doc


I spoke to the traders on the West Desk, and "EPMI Long Term California"
should be documented as Enron Power Marketing, Inc.  "Long Term California"
is just a book on the West Desk

	Julie Brewer@ENRON
	12/27/2000 03:42 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: EOL Deals between EPMI and RMT

We have recently traded a few deals between EPMI Long Term California and
Risk Management and Trading Corp. The way these are booked now indicates that
a Confirm will need to be generated between the two. Joe Hunter thinks that
these should probably be book to book transactions. The EPMI Long Term
California entity has not been used for financial nat gas transactions before
this. Can you shed some light on to whether or not EPMI should be considered
a subsidiary similar to ECC or EES.

Thanks.


Dan, sounds like we are moving backwards - but these guys tend to jump the
gun at times.  If it is not possible for these orgs to work together lets not
try and force them (ie) we will manage our own business and contract with
NEPCO when and if it makes sense.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 02/01/2001
08:22 AM ---------------------------

Brian Redmond
01/31/2001 05:56 PM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Reviews Plus

Dave,

Yes,  I've got these set up.

On a separate topic, I received a visit from D. Liebert (working for Dan L.
on EE&CC) to discuss the memo I sent out on the Tech Services Group.
During the discussion we identified several areas where EES' view diverges
from the view in my memo that ENA will manage its own technical risk and will
be supported by EE&CC.      Currently, EES is headed in the following
direction:

1. EE&CC will manage all technical risk in Enron as part of a consolidated
technical risk book.
2. EE&CC will be the sign off on all DASH's with respect to technical risk.
3. EE&CC is still trying to work out how their services will be charged to
the business units - not sure what "cost" is.

This central decision is (1.) above.  If EES is going to manage ENA's
technical risk then the balance between managing engineering cost and
managing technical risk will be eliminated.  Essentially we will be back to a
ENA (origination) vs. EE&CC (construction) relationship where we argue about
how much money they are spending and the amount of overhead that is included
in their "cost".  Your thoughts on this?

We didn't draw any lines and agreed to keep discussing to make this work.  I
would suggest that either I can meet with Dan L. to understand his views or
that we have another joint meeting with you and Dan's team to resolve.

Regards,
Brian

David W Delainey
01/31/2001 03:11 PM
To: Brian Redmond/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Reviews

Brian, I assume that you are doing the review for Bob Virgo, Wayne Mays, Jean
Mrha and Julie Gomez.

Regards
Delainey


I guess I am Pope for the day. The logic makes sense to me, but I would be hesitant in saying it is final. It's hard what still might be affected somewhere down the line but it's the best solution.

John

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	White, Stacey W.
Sent:	Thursday, October 18, 2001 1:49 PM
To:	Postlethwaite, John
Subject:	FW: index option

I cannot think of anything that would cause this to be incorrect.  Please let me know if you agree and I will bless the change.

Thanks,
Stacey

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Yang, Zhiyun
Sent:	Thursday, October 18, 2001 3:46 PM
To:	White, Stacey W.
Cc:	Postlethwaite, John
Subject:	index option

Hi Stacey:

  Just want to follow up to see if there is any after thought about what we discussed yesterday on Index Option.  From our discussion, index option will be reported in two records:  reported as physical in the delivery region, and financial in the index region with the corresponding position and risks.    This seems to be a better alternative than reporting the collapsed position in the delivery region in one record or reporting both position as physical  in two records in the delivery and index region.

   Could you please let me know if we should go ahead  implementing the changes?  We plan to move the current stage to production tonight and do a new stage release this week, I'd like this change, if going to occur, to go into this release.

   Thanks a lot.

- Zhiyun


Attached, please find ABX 67 (Cardoza) which would make it a felony to
sell power for unjust or unreasonable rates.

http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/bill/asm/ab_0051-0100/abx1_67_bill_20010424_amended
_asm.pdf


Judith E. Cox
Administrative Clerk
New York Independent System Operator
518-356-6233
jcox@nyiso.com
----- Forwarded by Judith Cox/NYISO on 07/30/2001 02:21 PM -----

                    Mike Hogan
                    <mhogan@cenhu        To:     jcox@nyiso.com
                    d.com>               cc:     "Dahl, Curt"
                                         <cdahl@keyspanenergy.com>
                    07/30/2001           Subject:     NYSRC ICAP WG MEETING ON AUG 2
                    02:01 PM

The ICAP Working Group of the New York State Reliability Council
("NYSRC") is posting this message to inform all interested parties of
the ability participate, on a "listen-only" basis, in the NYSRC ICAP
Working Group Conference Call No. 10 scheduled for August 2, 2001,
starting at 9:00A.M.  Attached in Word format is the Agenda for this
meeting.  The Working Group is an open meeting in accordance with NYSRC
Policy No. 2, which is available of the NYSRC web site at
"www.nysrc.org", on the "Policies" web page.

Those wishing to participate on a "listen-only" basis can call (608)
250-9281, and enter participant Code 132622, starting at 9:30 A.M.
Participants will be required to place their telephones on mute so as
not to prevent other parties from participating.  Those who plan on
listening to the meeting shall send an email to my attention at
"mhogan@cenhud.com" with the names of the individuals and organizations
participating.

Those who are not NYSRC ICAP WG Members or Alternate Members will be
given an opportunity to comment at the end of each meeting, or earlier
at the Chairman's invitation.

Should you have any questions, please contact me by email at
mhogan@cenhud.com or by phone at (845) 486-5213.

Michael P. Hogan
Secretary, NYSRC ICAP WG

(See attached file: NYSRC ICAP WG Agenda CC10.doc)
(See attached file: NYSRC ICAP WG Agenda CC10.doc)

 - NYSRC ICAP WG Agenda CC10.doc


---------------------- Forwarded by Airam Arteaga/HOU/ECT on 11/10/2000 10:58
AM ---------------------------

GASFUNDY@ENRON
11/10/2000 10:55 AM
Sent by: Chris Gaskill@ENRON
To: Airam Arteaga/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly Brown/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ina
Rangel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Becky Young/NA/Enron@Enron, Jessica
Presas/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Laura Harder/Corp/Enron@Enron, Amanda
Huble/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Gas Fundamentals Website

Please forward the following message to your groups:

We are proud to announce the launch of the production Gas Fundamentals
websites at http://gasfundy.corp.enron.com

As you browse the website please feel free to use the contact button to send
us any feedback, and report any issues you might
encounter.

If this is your first visit to the website,  there may be a few issues that
you might encounter, such as:
1) Your browser may prompt you to download a Macromedia Flash control
2) Adobe PDF documents may prompt you to download them, rather than opening
in the browser.

If you encounter any of these issues,  please contact Demetrion Ware at Ext:
57607, or Dave Dronet at Ext: 53482 and we will work to resolve the issues as
soon as possible.

NOTE : This site will only function if you use Internet Explore 4.0 or
higher, if you are trying to view the site using Netscape
it will not function properly.

Thank you,
David Dronet


Now that the auction is underway and the possibility of being purchased in very high, we need to get back in gear, TODAY.

1.	Everyone needs to be here no later than 8:00am, 7:30 once we start trading again
2.	No playing on the internet or other games (ex. cards) - this will no longer be tolerated
3.	I have said this many times before but this is the ideal time to LEARN.
		bring in your options books or anything else that you can read to learn more about the energy industry
		start studying the firms rolls, learn what the macros do, develop new checks and balances
		become more familiar with forwards and options details and other excel queries and where the curves come from
		understand the curve files (these will change but the general format will be similar)

Just to be clear, this is coming down from Jeff Gossett.
The list for NetCo. is not set in stone and can be changed if someone steps up, or if someone doesn't.

We are still getting paid everyday and should be putting our time into the company.
I know it has been boring but things need to change starting today, things will start to pick up in the next few days.

The current restart date is January 21, 2001 but may be pushed forward to January 14th.

I would like to get your ideas for changes/improvements to our current processes/systems.  We have a slightly improved firm roll to use but nothing else has changed.
This is our chance to change the things we couldn't before.  There is no reason why we have to continue doing things the same as before.

Please seriously think about this over the next few days and get back to me with any ideas you have, no matter how small, every little bit helps.

Come talk to me if you have any questions or concerns,

Thanks,
Kam