Louise,

On Monday, prior to my leaving for Buffalo,  I spoke with Dave Gorte and was informed that since the sale of the Napoleonville Land was greater than $2.5 MM, it is categorized as a diversiture requiring a DASH.

Since the negotiations were quite contentious between Reliant, Texas Brine and Enron - we (Eva, Lisa and myself) had worked with Mr. Gorte to create multiple versions of the DASH.  It was not until Wednesday afternoon that Reliant was the chosen "victor."  In addition, since I felt you were apprised of the deal and Mr. Gorte had not informed me of an appropriate process, Lisa had waited until we knew who the counterparty was before getting on your schedule.

Unfortunately, this meant Wednesday afternoon around 4 pm, but we had been informed by Tammi Schoppe that you were available until 5 pm. Even though the banks were closed, I had wanted to sign the executables on Wednesday so Reliant would not have an opportunity to change their mind over the holiday weekend.  It was certainly not our intent to have you not appropriately briefed regarding the transaction.

I will be flying back to Houston today and will be landing around 5 pm.  Both Eva Rainer and Lisa Druzbik are in today and I am leaving instructions to (hopefully) close the deal today.  Julie Gomez will be signing on my behalf -- for detailed questions regarding the negotiations please refer to Eva.  My cell is 713-302-4187.

Regards, Jean

-----Original Message-----
From: Kitchen, Louise
Sent: Sun 11/25/2001 2:10 PM
To: Mrha, Jean
Cc: Lavorato, John; Gomez, Julie A.; Rainer, Eva; Nemec, Gerald
Subject: RE: Sale of Napoleonville Land

At 4pm on Wednesday Liza arrived with the DASH.  It had not been circulated prior to that and there was no-one available to discuss the deal as Eva was not in the office.  Please  have someone ready to discuss this deal and circulate the DASH in advance of when you want it signing.

4pm on Wednesday with no briefing on the deal didn't give enough time to complete a DASH.

Louise

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Mrha, Jean
Sent:   Monday, November 19, 2001 6:06 PM
To:     Kitchen, Louise
Cc:     Lavorato, John; Gomez, Julie A.; Rainer, Eva; Nemec, Gerald
Subject:        Sale of Napoleonville Land

Louise,

Tomorrow, I am flying to Buffalo, NY for Thanksgiving with my father.  As such, for the potential sale of the Napoleonville Land, Julie Gomez will sign on my behalf for LRCI Inc. after both appropriate commercial, accounting and legal parameters have been met. The status is as follows:

Texas Brine has been informed that another counterparty has presented a premium bid of $ 3 MM and has the opportunity to counter.  Texas Brine was the first counterparty to try to acquire the land at $2.35 MM.
Reliant has slowed the transaction close due to their legal changes to the "Act of Sale" document.  As such, Gerald Nemec (my legal) is reviewing the document in conjuction with our Louisiana counsel as well as other relevant internal legal groups (i.e. litigation and environmental).

I am confident that the land will get sold and was hoping to close the transaction prior to my leaving.  However, this bidding "war" has the potential for ENA to extract an even higher auction price.  The approximate book value of the land is $1.4 MM.

I can be reached via Blackberry or cell (713-302-4187).  Eva Rainer, Manager, is also an appropriate person to contact for any questions.

Regards, Mrha


Start Date: 4/28/01; HourAhead hour: 1;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042801.txt


Dear Student,

What classes are you registered for?

NOTE: The classrooms are now open for Summer Session A.  If you are having
difficulty entering a class you are registered for make sure you have turned
in all of your tuition assistance forms. For further information on tuition
assistance contact finaid@amunet.edu.

Thanks
TechSupport


Rhonda,

Can you provide me with the Agency Agreement or other documentation you may
have received with respect to this agency relationship.  Thanks!

	Rhonda L Denton
	08/29/2000 05:18 PM

		 To: Shari Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Ameren Services Company

---------------------- Forwarded by Rhonda L Denton/HOU/ECT on 08/29/2000
05:19 PM ---------------------------

Rhonda L Denton
08/25/2000 02:53 PM
To: Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dana Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Genia
FitzGerald/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Ann
Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kyle Schultz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kim S Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Berger/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tracy Ngo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gretchen Lotz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dean
Laurent/HOU/ECT@ECT, John D Suarez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cara Semperger/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jan M King/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike
Swerzbin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael Etringer/HOU/ECT@ECT,
John Malowney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laura
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cyril Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, James E Terrell/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Corry Bentley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matt Lorenz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thresa A
Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Portz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sharen Cason/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Veronica Gonzalez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S
Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christopher
Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Suttle/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rod Nelson/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Stephanie Piwetz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie
Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Russell T Kelley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stewart Rosman/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Holli Krebs/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Choi/SF/ECT@ECT, Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Sean Crandall/PDX/ECT@ECT, Diana Scholtes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Mead/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Jeff Richter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip Platter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Smith L
Day/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT, D Brett Hunsucker/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Kim Ward/HOU/ECT@ECT, John M Forney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward D
Baughman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kayne Coulter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alonzo Williams/HOU/ECT@ECT,
John Kinser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Benson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Larry
Valderrama/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul J Broderick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward
Sacks/Corp/Enron@Enron, Janet H Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janice R
Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shari Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Rogers Herndon/HOU/ECT@ect, Jesse Bryson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stanley
Cocke/PDX/ECT@ECT, Michael M Driscoll/PDX/ECT@ECT, Brian
Robinhold/PDX/ECT@ECT, Doug Gilbert-Smith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kimberly
Hundl/Corp/Enron@Enron, Joy Werner/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Elsie Lew/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Dan Houston/Corp/Enron@Enron, Amy Horton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kim
Durham/HOU/ECT@ECT, Theresa R Kotrla/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Ameren Services Company

Please note the following changes:
Ameren Services Company (ASC)
Assigned its sales agreement to:
Ameren Energy, Inc. as agent (ASC)
(for and on behalf of Union Electric Company d/b/a Ameren UE, Ameren Energy
Marketing Company, and Ameren Energy Generating Company)
Transmission remains with Ameren Services Company


One day a farmer's donkey fell down into a well. The animal cried piteously for hours as the farmer tried to figure out what to do. Finally he decided the animal was old and the well needed to be covered up anyway. It just wasn't worth it to retrieve the donkey.

He invited all his neighbors to come over and help him. They all grabbed a shovel and began to shovel dirt into the well. At first, the donkey realized what was happening and cried horribly. Then, to everyone's amazement, he quieted down. A few shovel loads later, the farmer finally looked down the well and was astonished at what he saw.

With every shovel of dirt that hit his back, the donkey was doing something amazing. He would shake it off and take a step up.  As the farmer's neighbors continued to shovel dirt on top of the animal, he would shake it off and take a step up. Pretty soon, everyone was amazed as the donkey stepped up over the edge of the well and trotted off!

Now, the Moral of the Story:
Life is going to shovel dirt on you, all kinds of dirt. The trick to getting out of the well is to shake it off and take a step up.  Each of our troubles is a stepping stone. We can get out of the deepest wells just by not stopping, never giving up! Shake it off and take a step up!

Remember the five simple rules to be happy:
1. Free your heart from hatred.
2. Free your mind from worries.
3. Live simply.
4. Give more.
5. Expect less.

P.S.: The donkey later came back and kicked THE SHIT out of the bastard that tried burying him.

Moral: When you try to cover your ass, it always comes back to get you.


Hey Kate,

Could you print the attached Adobe Acrobat file and give copies to:

Ed Clark
Jody Blackburn
Mark Mullen
Andy Chen
and me too!

Thanks,
Laura
---------------------- Forwarded by Laura Wente/HOU/ECT on 11/03/2000 01:13
PM ---------------------------

Mark Ewbank <mewbank@herrerainc.com> on 11/03/2000 01:06:22 PM
To: "'Laura.Wente@enron.com'" <Laura.Wente@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Proposal for Port of Longview project

The attached Acrobat file contains our entire proposal, as will be sent over
the weekend in hard copy form.  Please let me know if you need additional
information, clarifications, etc.  We look forward to hearing from you.

 <<1800 Herrera Qualifications.pdf>>

------------------------------------------
Mark Ewbank
Senior Environmental Engineer
Herrera Environmental Consultants
2200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 601
Seattle, WA   98121-1820

telephone 206.441.9080
fax 206.441.9108
e-mail: mewbank@herrerainc.com
http://www.herrerainc.com/

 - 1800 Herrera Qualifications.pdf


Hi Allyson,

Someone was asking which of the information we have filed is public
information.  Is the petition itself public?  What else would be public?

I know this is a variation to the "what is confidential" question. Once
again, your assistance is appreciated.

Kay


Why can't we send below email exchange to John?
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Taylor, Diane
Sent:	Wednesday, December 05, 2001 5:11 PM
To:	Oxley, David; Joyce, Mary; Jones, Robert W.- HR Exec
Cc:	Callahan, Timothy; Wheeler, Terrie
Subject:	RE: Funds from House Sale
Importance:	High

David,

Tim is working on the international employee issues. This employee is a domestic employee.

I just spoke with Citicapital and they are not making any expenditures on behalf of Enron.  They will not release these funds because they are not on the preferred vendor list on the first day order.  They are concerned that the Court will request all funds ($4 Million advanced for international moves, $7.2 million paid for outstanding invoices, funds received from home closings) to be returned.

We have been trying to get answers to the relocation questions since yesterday.  We were talking with MaryJean Potenzone, but I think she was relying on another attorney for these answers.  At this time, we have not been authorized to make any payments to our relocation vendors.

We also have another employee who has his furniture on a moving van.  The relocation company will not release the furniture unless they receive pay from either Enron or the employee.  This employee was terminated on Monday and will be evicted from his corporate housing today.  He has been calling me since Monday for answers, but I do not have anything to tell him.

Do you have any suggestions as to how to get answers to our relocation questions?

Thanks for any assistance you can give me.

Diane

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Oxley, David
Sent:	Wednesday, December 05, 2001 4:20 PM
To:	Hartmann, John  ; Taylor, Diane; Callahan, Timothy
Cc:	Moss, Kevin; Fehl, Rick
Subject:	RE: Funds from House Sale

Tim,

Aren't you handling this?
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hartmann, John
Sent:	Wednesday, December 05, 2001 4:10 PM
To:	Taylor, Diane
Cc:	Moss, Kevin; Fehl, Rick; Oxley, David
Subject:	Funds from House Sale

Diane,

As you know the funds from my house sale are being held by Citi Relo, I would like the following answered.

1. When can I expect the entire owed amount wired to my account?
2. If not the entire amount, why can not the equity amount minus realtor fees be processed immediately?
3. Will I be paid interest on the my equity amount Citi is holding?

I have a considerable amount of money tied up in this transaction and need resolution.

John


As per Gary's request, here is the revised letter.  If you will send the
executed copies to me, I will arrange to have them signed on behalf of Enron.

"GARY BURNS" <GARY_BURNS@cemexusa.com> on 12/17/99 01:40:46 PM
To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: "CINDY EVANGELISTA" <CINDY_EVANGELISTA@cemexusa.com>
Subject: Re: Confidentiality Agreement

Mark,
      The Confidentiality Agreement must be addressed to Enron and printed on
Cemex letterhead, so please send the modified document to Cindy in an
electronic
format (ie Word via email).  Cindy will then print out two originals on our
letterhead and send you both originals for signature by Enron.   Thanks, GPB

---------------------- Forwarded by GARY BURNS/Tex/Usa/Cemex on 12/17/99 07:37
PM ---------------------------

GARY BURNS
12/17/99 07:21 PM

To:   "Mark Taylor" <mtaylo1@ect.enron.com> @ CEMEXUSA
cc:   CINDY EVANGELISTA/Tex/Usa/Cemex@CEMEX
Subject:  Re: Confidentiality Agreement

Mark,
       Our attorney said that modifying the attached Agreement so that the
protected party is " CEMEX USA Management, Inc., as well as its affiliates
(CEMEX), " is acceptable.  Please make the required changes and send the
document to my secretary, Cindy Evangelista.   I am on vacation until
1/4/2000,
but will try to progress the signing of the Agreement while I'm gone.
Regards,
GPB

"Mark Taylor" <mtaylo1@ect.enron.com> on 12/15/99 11:29:49 PM

To:   GARY BURNS@CEMEX
cc:
Subject:  Confidentiality Agreement

Here is the Confidentiality Agreement we signed last year.

(See attached file: CA - Cemex2.doc)

 - CA - Cemex2.doc


Thanks Mark.
Looking forward to getting this turned around and to the product list.
Bob, I owe some client names, and we'll get that to you.
Steve

----- Original Message -----
From: <Mark.Greenberg@enron.com>
To: <jwelder@kleberg.com>; <stevet@amerexenergy.com>
Cc: <Bob.Shults@enron.com>; <Tana.Jones@enron.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 3:19 PM
Subject: BETA with Enron

> Jimmy/Steve -
>
> Attached is the updated version of the BETA based upon Jimmy's comments
and
> our subsequent discussion.  Also attached is the updated fee agreement.
> Since we anticipate signing the BETA as a formal document, I have modified
> the Fee agreement accordingly.
>
> Bob will forward the product exhibit to the fee agreement under separate
> e-mail.
>
>
> Please let me know if you should need anything further.
>
> (See attached file: amerex natural gas fee agmt(enrondraft 3-13-01).doc)
> (See attached file: beta-amerex(enrondraft3-13-01).DOC)
>
>
> Mark
> Senior Counsel, ENA
> Phone:     713-345-8897
> Facsimile: 713-646-3940
> E-Mail:      Mark.Greenberg@enron.com


The report named: Enron Americas Position Report <http://erv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=102&report_name=Enron+Americas+Position+Report&category_cd=2&category_name=ENRON%20CONSOLIDATED&toc_hide=1&sTV1=2&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=10/22/2001>, published as of 10/22/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.

(Revision: 10)

Publisher's Notes:

FINAL


Kathy-

Just let me know when you get the trophy.  I can pick it up at your house
(front porch or whatever is convenient for you) and leave the $$ in your
mailbox.

Susan

KKW816@aol.com on 05/02/2001 03:18:16 PM
To: Susan.W.Pereira@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Re: Tigers

You can send it to me at 1904 Albans 77005. It is small and very mailable.
Kali is such a good player and sweet girl - I know she is going to have fun
no matter what. I think we all are going to miss the Micro Soccer days with
small teams and more of a chance to get to know everyone! Have a great
summer! Kathy


I think I have a lasagna in there. You can have it.

cd


Rick, here is Jodie's Mid Year review.  Thanks. Lynn

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dietz, Rick
Sent:	Wednesday, December 26, 2001 10:37 AM
To:	Blair, Lynn
Subject:	Mid-Year Performance Evaluation (Jodie)

Please email me a copy of Jodie Floyd's mid-year 2001 performance evaluation.  I would like to update it for year end.  Thanks.

Rick


Okay - Both (per Bob) can be sent to:

Chris Edmonds
TrueQuote
9931 Corporate Campus Drive, Suite 2400
Louisville, Kentucky 40223
800.327.1499

Please let me know if you need further information.

Thanks for all of your help Tana!

Lo


Start Date: 4/29/01; HourAhead hour: 19;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042919.txt


Here is the information produced in the study for Marc de la Roche.

-Kevin K.

---------------------- Forwarded by Kevin Kindall/Corp/Enron on 12/20/2000
05:42 PM ---------------------------

Kevin Kindall
11/28/2000 09:29 AM
To: Russell Dyk/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: JCC study

---------------------- Forwarded by Kevin Kindall/Corp/Enron on 11/28/2000
09:32 AM ---------------------------

Kevin Kindall
09/29/2000 05:11 PM
To: James Pyke/AP/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: JCC study

 Hello.  Please read the JCC note.  Feedback welcome.

-Kevin K.


Mr. Enloe -

Ken Lay asked me to let you know that he doesn't know Stephen Bennett.

Rosalee

"Enloe, Ted" <Ted.Enloe@COMPAQ.com> on 05/24/2000 08:18:07 AM
To: "Benjamin M. Rosen (E-mail)" <ben@brosen.com>, "Chris A. Davis (E-mail)"
<chris.davis@gulfaero.com>, "Frank P. Doyle (E-mail)"
<Frank.Doyle@COMPAQ.com>, "George H. Heilmeier (E-mail)" <ghh@telcordia.com>,
"Judith L. Craven (E-mail)" <lynnj@iname.com>, "Kenneth L. Lay (E-mail)"
<klay@enron.com>, "Kenneth Roman (E-mail)" <kenroman@worldnet.att.net>,
"Lawrence T. Babbio Jr. (E-mail)" <babbio@BellAtlantic.com>, "Lucille S.
Salhany (E-mail)" <lucie@jhmedia.com>, "Peter N. Larson (E-mail)"
<hkiss@bruncorp.com>, "Thomas J. Perkins (E-mail)" <kjewett@kpcb.com>
cc: "Fusco, David L." <David.Fusco@COMPAQ.com>
Subject: FW: Avnet/Compaq Decision at Intuit

If any of you know Stephen Bennett, would you please contact David Fusco to
make a call.

Thanks,  ted

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fusco, David L.
> Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2000 12:39 AM
> To: Enloe, Ted
> Subject: FW: Avnet/Compaq Decision at Intuit
> Importance: High
>
> Hi Ted.  We're in the final stages of closing a significant High
> Availability opportunity at Intuit.  Our San Diego sales team has done an
> outstanding job to position Compaq as their vendor of choice against Sun,
> HP and EMC.  Please refer to the email below for more specific details on
> Intuit's decision.
>
> Sometime next week Intuit's CIO, Jennifer Hall, will be presenting their
> formal recommendation to Stephen Bennett, President, CEO.  We've been told
> that he's friends with a Compaq board member.  I need your help in
> identifying that person.  Once identified, we'd like them to contact
> Stephen ASAP in order to communicate the following:
>
> Compaq's senior management, including the Board of Directors, is aware of
> the Intuit opportunity.  Compaq's committed, and determined, to meet and
> exceed their expectations.
>
> The Intuit sales team, headed by Bob Oakes, will prepare a briefing
> document for our board member to use.  Please advise ASAP.  Thanks for
> your help and support on this!
>
> Dave Fusco
> Area Director, Southern California
> Enterprise Business Unit
> 949-462-9762 W
> 949-462-9763 F
> 714-394-9009 M
> 800-842-2460 P
> david.fusco@compaq.com
>
> Intuit Names Stephen Bennett As President, CEO
> Senior Financial Services Executive Brings Broad Experience Growing
> Diverse Businesses
> Mountain View, Calif. -- Jan. 24, 2000 -- Intuit Inc. (NASDAQ: INTU
> <http://www.quicken.com/investments/quotes/?symbol=INTU>) announced today
> that its board of directors has selected Stephen M. Bennett as president
> and chief executive officer. Bennett assumes his responsibilities
> immediately, succeeding Bill Campbell, who had been acting chief executive
> since September. Campbell is retiring from day-to-day responsibilities but
> will remain chairman of the board of directors. Bennett was also named to
> the board.
> Bennett, 45, was most recently an executive vice president and member of
> the Office of the CEO at GE Capital, the financial services subsidiary of
> General Electric Corp. GE Capital is the world leader in numerous
> financial industries, including private label credit cards, commercial
> equipment leasing and vendor finance. With $330 billion in assets, GE
> Capital provides 42% of General Electric's overall profits and is among
> the world's largest non-banking financial institutions.
> "Steve is an outstanding leader from a company renowned for strong
> leadership," said Campbell. "His experience is tailor-made to fit Intuit's
> needs now and in the future. We wanted someone with service industry
> knowledge, who had led large, complex organizations and with proven
> ability to produce fast growth. Steve is the ideal choice to take Intuit
> to the multi-billion dollar level."
> "Intuit is the leader in e-finance. Quicken.com is already the leader in
> online tax preparation and online mortgage origination," said Bennett, who
> will relocate from Connecticut to the Bay Area. "I'm excited to have the
> opportunity to continue developing services for the Internet and take
> Intuit's industry leadership to new heights."
> During his GE career, Bennett held significant leadership positions in six
> different businesses within the company, spanning both manufacturing and
> financial services. In his most recent position, he oversaw a portfolio of
> five different companies whose more than 20,000 employees last year
> generated $15 billion in annual volume. Prior to that, as president and
> CEO of GE Capital e-Business, he pioneered the company's efforts to
> leverage the Internet across GE Capital's worldwide portfolio of
> businesses.
> Previously he delivered significant growth as the president and CEO of GE
> Capital's more than 4,000-employee Vendor Financial Services business.
> Under his leadership, assets grew to more than $13 billion from $5 billion
> and net income increased to $200 million from $80 million in four years.
> Intuit board member John Doerr said he was impressed by Bennett's broad
> base of experience. "Steve knows business-to-business as well as
> business-to-consumer. He knows service businesses. And he gets the Net.
> Intuit's product leadership and Steve's ability to grow businesses are an
> ideal match for our future."
> Bennett added, "Intuit's management team is strong, stable and experienced
> and works well together," he said. "This is one of the few management
> teams to successfully and rapidly transform a company to the Net. I'm glad
> to have the opportunity to lead Intuit's continued growth and expansion."
> Scott Cook, Intuit founder and chairman of its executive committee, said,
> "Steve shares Intuit's values. He's a straightforward, no-nonsense,
> results-driven executive who cares deeply about people. His
> values-oriented leadership style energizes organizations to great
> achievement, and I look forward to working with him."
>
>
>  -----Original Message-----
>  From: Marino, Richard [mailto:Richard_Marino@intuit.com]
>  Sent: Monday, April 24, 2000 8:01 PM
>  To: Oakes, Bob; 'Janice.Farnow@avnet.com'; Velijanian, Fred
>  Cc: Bell, Lance; Pan, Andrew
>  Subject: High Availability Server Evaluation Results
>
>
>  We first want to express our appreciation to both HP and Compaq for
> their
>  efforts in helping make our evaluation project a sucess.  This did
> not
>  surprise us, as you have both been strong partners with us up to
> now.
>
>  As we indicated at the beginning, this evaluation was specifically
> aimed at
>  how well each vendor performed at helping us install, develop, test
> and
>  engineer an effective Oracle HA solution.  The ability to work with
> our
>  Intuit team and the strength of the vendors support were critical
> factors.
>  Certainly the difficultly of data migration impacted this project,
> limited
>  our performance testing, and remains of great concern to us in
> considering
>  any migration in the future.
>
>  We are taking the opportunity to provide you with our honest
> evaluation in
>  the hopes that this information may be of value to you.  We do
> however
>  consider this information confidential and ask that you do not share
> it
>  outside of your organization.  In addition we are providing it with
> the
>  understanding that you will not use the details contained herein to
>  criticize each other in an effort to promote your own position.
>
>  Here is a summary of our evaluation:
>
>  Sun Clusters - unacceptable, lacking features and EMC disk support
>  Sun/Veritas Clusters - acceptable, but uncertain support and future
>  HP Clusters - very good, strong features,  strong product roadmap,
> very good
>  technical support,  marginal sales support, variable support during
>  evaluation
>  Compaq - very good, stronger features, strong product roadmap,
> outstanding
>  support, higher risk
>
>  It should be understood, that there has not been a final decision
> and
>  management has not approved a migration plan.
>
>  We recommended Compaq, provided that we would be able to reduce the
> risk
>  factor associated with the recent release of their current software
> and
>  hardware architectures.
>
>  Management has requested that some further analysis be done (which
> were not
>  in the scope of this project) including cost/benefit analysis from
> our
>  customer's viewpoint and conversion cost estimates.  We believe we
> have all
>  the vendor information necessary to complete this analysis though
> they may
>  be a few pricing issues that will need clarification.
>
>  We will be in contact with each vendor regarding the disposition of
> the
>  loaned equipment we have on site from each vendor.
>
>  We again thank you for your efforts.  You will both remain key
> partners of
>  Intuit in the forseeable future and we hope to see our relationship,
>  whatever the final determination by management concerning this
> project, to
>  continue to improve.
>
>  Richard Marino
>  Lance Bell
>


---------------------- Forwarded by Lorna Brennan/ET&S/Enron on 06/20/2000
11:15 AM ---------------------------

webmaster@cera.com on 06/15/2000 10:04:27 PM
To: Lorna.Brennan@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Monthly Briefing--The Pressure Cooker - CERA Alert

**********************************************************************
CERA Alert: Sent Thu, June 15, 2000
**********************************************************************

Title: Monthly Briefing--The Pressure Cooker
Author: N. American Natural Gas Team
E-Mail Category: Alert
Product Line: North American Gas ,
URL: http://www.cera.com/cfm/track/eprofile.cfm?u=5526&m=1230 ,

Pressure remains extremely strong in the United States gas market, as three
factors-increasing power generation demand, lower storage inventories, and US
wellhead supply still struggling to rebound-call into question the ability to
build storage to a level adequate for next winter. As strong as gas market
fundamentals are, gas prices are being supported also by concurrent strength
in oil and liquids markets, making traditional alternatives to gas much more
expensive than in recent years.  In this environment intense competition
between power generation demand and storage injections will continue
throughout the summer-with pressure increasing into July as temperatures
rise-and gas will continue to price at the high levels necessary to
discourage end-use demand.

The $1.00 per million British thermal units (MMBtu) increase in gas prices
since the beginning of May has already driven responses among end users.
First, gas is now pricing at a slight premium to residual fuel oil on the
East Coast, and gas will likely lose approximately 600 million cubic feet
(MMcf) per day of demand to residual fuel oil this summer relative to last
summer. Second, several ammonia manufacturing facilities have begun to shut
down. Equally telling, however, is that heat in any one region of the
country-most recently the West-is all that is required to sustain gas prices
above $4.00 at the Henry Hub, despite relatively moderate temperatures
elsewhere and demand reductions in industrial and other power markets.
Underlying pressures are such that prices are likely to rise on average from
current levels as higher temperatures arrive. For these reasons CERA expects
prices to average $4.45 at the Henry Hub during July (see Table 1), and even
greater volatility is !
possible. The intense competition and need to price out end-use demand mean
that the market is vulnerable to spikes above $5.00 per MMBtu amid heat waves
this summer.

Gas Storage-Injections Increase, but Little Relief Yet

The gas market experienced a small measure of relief in early June as storage
injections finally reached a pace closer to historical averages, with the
American Gas Association (AGA) reporting 78 billion cubic feet (Bcf) of
injections during each of the weeks ending June 2 and 9. However, these
injections did little to reduce a deficit that is now close to 400 Bcf on a
year-over-year basis, and conditions may not again be as favorable as they
have been recently for injections for many weeks, or even months, to come. As
temperatures rise through the end of the month, injections are likely to
slow, so that for June CERA expects an average injection rate of
approximately 10 Bcf per day. The deficit that stood at an estimated 394 Bcf
as of the end of May (see Table 2), on an inventory level of approximately
1,454 Bcf, is expected to rise slightly during June, to 403 Bcf, despite a
healthy injection rate for the first nine days of the month.

With US wellhead supply still running an estimated 0.5 to 1.0 Bcf per day
below year-earlier levels and with added imports from Canada just offsetting
this decline, even the moderate demand growth expected for July relative to
last July will make reducing the deficit a difficult task. Each month in
which this 400 Bcf deficit carries forward increases the likelihood that
inventories will be at their lowest maximum ever this October. Injections
like those in the recent two weeks would have to continue into July for this
pattern to reverse in a significant way, an unlikely event that would occur
only under very mild weather conditions.

Regional Markets

With the exception of the Rocky Mountains, western differentials have been
supported by waves of hot weather and extremely strong gas demand for power
generation within the region. This strong demand is pulling supplies from the
Permian and San Juan Basins to the West Coast and has pushed up capacity
utilization on the Southwest pipelines into California. Prices at the
California border have been particularly strong, averaging over a $0.30
premium to the Henry Hub so far this month. Continued strong western demand
looks likely to support prices within the region through July, as power loads
remain strong and hydroelectric output declines. In addition, the early heat
waves have begun to erode the California storage surplus, although
inventories in the region as a whole remain strong (see Table 3).

CERA's outlook by region follows:

*  Rockies. Continuing strong supply growth and low seasonal demand have
pushed up exports out of the Rocky Mountains region. High utilization rates
on export pipelines will keep Rocky Mountain differentials wide during the
rest of the summer. CERA expects an average July differential to the Henry
Hub of $0.55 per MMBtu.

*  San Juan. The pull on supplies from California has narrowed the
differential between the San Juan Basin and the Henry Hub, and this West
Coast pull looks likely to remain strong through the summer. CERA expects a
differential between the San Juan Basin and the Henry Hub of $0.16 per MMBtu
during July.

*  Permian and Mid-Continent. As Texas power loads increase, the competition
from the West Coast and Texas markets for Permian supplies should intensify.
Permian differentials, which have been averaging around $0.15 per MMBtu to
the Henry Hub, should narrow. CERA expects a $0.06 per MMBtu differential for
July. Mid-Continent supplies should price just below Permian supplies, at an
$0.08 per MMBtu differential to the Henry Hub.

*  Chicago. Chicago differentials continue to trade around $0.05 per MMBtu to
the Henry Hub, and although hot weather and climbing demand within the region
could put some upward pressure on those differentials, ample seasonal
pipeline capacity into the region will limit pressure. CERA expects a July
differential of $0.06 per MMBtu.

*  Northeast. New York citygate differentials have a higher floor this
summer, namely higher fuel costs from the Gulf Coast as a result of $4.00
gas. The result has been differentials above $0.30 from Transco Station 65
but closer to $0.30 from the Henry Hub. As power generation load reaches its
peak, however, differentials can rise even in summer. Short-lived power load
peaks may lift weekly New York differentials into the $0.40s, but for the
month of July CERA expects the New York differential to average $0.34.

Canadian Markets-Demand
Still Down

Canadian demand continues to be down on a year-over-year basis. Volumes on
TransCanada Pipeline are 400 MMcf below levels at this time last year, and
Alberta demand is 200 MMcf below; both of these reductions are primarily
storage related. Weak storage injections, driven in large part by the lack of
an adequate summer-winter price spread, continue to place inventories further
behind 1999 levels. Although inventories are still well above the five-year
average, unless injections increase, it is more likely that end-of-season
inventories will be comparable to the five-year average (450 Bcf) rather than
to 1999 levels (484 Bcf).

Export volumes continue to be slightly higher than last year. Thus far in
June, flows on Northern Border Pipeline are similar to 1999, while PG&E GT-NW
is currently operating 300 MMcf higher. Demand on the West Coast is expected
to continue this trend for the summer.

Alberta supply build for June is likely to be flat with 1999 levels. An
outage pattern similar to last year's has emerged. TCE/NOVA has had
maintenance projects ongoing in June, but the supply reduction is primarily
the result of plant turnarounds. Thus far in June, reductions in supply
because of maintenance have been as high as 850 MMcf but should average 300
MMcf for the month. Even though June is expected to be flat year-over-year,
the fact that this maintenance reduction is less than 1999 maintenance
reductions implies that a return to supply growth has not yet occurred.
Supply is still expected to start showing growth in the second half of the
year, largely in the fourth quarter, as a result of the increased level of
drilling. The annual average supply is expected to be around 100 MMcf per day
higher than in 1999 as the result of the return to growth in Alberta and
modest growth in British Columbia (again primarily later in the year), as
well as the new production from!
 Ft. Liard that is now onstream.

The NYMEX and Henry Hub price strength is being felt in Canada. AECO is
expected to average C$5.15 per gigajoule (GJ) (US$3.69 per MMBtu) for June
with a differential in the low US$0.60s. July is expected to average C$5.44
per GJ (US$3.90 per MMBtu). The Henry-to-AECO differential is likely to
remain relatively high until storage injections increase the demand.

Follow URL for PDF version of this Monthly Briefing with associated tables.

**end**

Follow URL for PDF version of this Alert.
Please note: Should the above URL not work, please use the following:
http://www.cera.com/client/nag/alt/061500_16/nag_alt_061500_16_ab.html

**************************************************************************
CERA's Spring 2000 Roundtable event dates and agendas are now available at
http://www.cera.com/event
**************************************************************************

**********************************************************************
Account Changes
To edit your personal account information, including your e-mail
address, etc. go to: http://eprofile.cera.com/cfm/edit/account.cfm

This electronic message and attachments, if any, contain information
from Cambridge Energy Research Associates, Inc. (CERA) which is
confidential and may be privileged. Unauthorized disclosure, copying,
distribution or use of the contents of this message or any attachments,
in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited.

Terms of Use: http://www.cera.com/tos.html
Questions/Comments: webmaster@cera.com
Copyright 2000. Cambridge Energy Research Associates


Prepay for Dominion for April 2002 to be made on Friday, March 29th.  I printed out the attached form and gave it to Doug Sewell.

Prepay amount = 10,000 dth per day x 30 days x $2.1562 = $646,860.00


Attached is Bob Superty's summary of the impact on the late noms today.  We
do not anticipate any pipeline penalties.  On those pipes where the nom type
is "Intraday", there may be some pipeline imbalance created for us to work
through.  The logistics staff will have a lot of work to do on Thursday
morning to contact customers asking them to renom on the pipes where our noms
were late.  Overall, these pipelines worked well with us today.
Let me know if you have any questions.  --Sally

---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 06/28/2000 06:59 PM
---------------------------

Robert Superty
06/28/2000 05:40 PM
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Philippe A
Bibi/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: System outage nomination impact

I have attached a quick summary of where we currently stand with our
nominations as a result of the hardware problems today.

Please call me if you have any questions, thanks - Bob Superty


Per my voice mail message.
---------------------- Forwarded by Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT on 12/12/2000 12:55 PM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kevin Meredith @ ENRON                           12/11/2000 05:29 PM

To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Blumenthal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen H
Douglas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rudi Zipter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bjorn
Hagelmann/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Swinney/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melba
Lozano/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jason Althaus/Corp/Enron@Enron, Robert B
Cass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: NEW ENRONONLINE PRODUCT - PLEASE APPROVE

Your review and approval of the following two product type in the EOL
Datamanager is needed (for directions on approval , please see steps for
approval at the bottom of this e-mail).

Traders: Lee Jackson and Alan Engberg

US PurEth OPIS   vs LLDPE CMAI           Jan01           c/LB

A US Purity Ethane financial Swap Transaction with Enron North America Corp.,
under which the Seller pays a Floating Price and the Buyer pays the price
submitted by Counterparty on the website (the Fixed Price) in each case in
respect of the Notional Quantity per Determination Period.  Each calendar
month during the term of the Transaction will be a Determination Period. The
Notional Quantity per Determination Period is the volume submitted by
Counterparty via EnronOnline.  The Payment Date(s) will be 5 business days
after the Floating Price is determinable. The Floating Price shall be the
Index for the relevant Determination Period.
The term of the Transaction shall be from the Effective Date to the
Termination Date. The Effective Date is 01 Jan 2001. The Termination Date is
31 Jan 2001.
The Index for a month shall be the difference between
(i) the arithmetic average of the high and low Cents/Pound prices of Linear
Low Density Polyethylene - Butene film grade published under the headings
"North America Product Prices for (DATE): LLDPE Domestic" in the month-end
issue of Chemical Market Associates, Inc.'s Monomers Market Report effective
for such month, and
(ii) the average of the prices for each day in the Determination Period,
where the price for each day shall be the 'Avg' price for Purity Ethane
published in the table entitled 'Mont Belvieu Spot Gas Liquids Prices' under
the heading 'Purity Ethane:  Any Current Month' in the issue of Oil Price
Information Service ('OPIS') that reports prices effective for such
Determination Period.
The price is quoted in cents (US) per unit of volume which will be the
Contractual Currency.
The unit of measure against which the price is quoted shall be pounds.

==============================================================================
=====
STEPS FOR APPROVAL:

click the  START button
select  PROGRAMS
select  TEST APPLICATIONS
select ENRONONLINE CLUSTER(PROD)
 PROCEED WITH USUAL LOGIN/PASSWORD
click the Enron Online Production Cluster "START" button
select EnronOnLine (this is the EOL Datamanager)
 PROCEED WITH EOL LOGIN/PASSWORD
click on the "+" for EnronOnLine
click on the "+" for Product Types
click on the "+" for "Awaiting Approval" (OR  "Partially Approved")
select the product requiring review as stated in e-mail above
Right "mouse" click on "properties" to view product set-up
TO APPROVE:  Right mouse click on "Approved"

Thanks - Rob Cass  -  Melba Lozano - Kevin Meredith
                   x35491           x58986                  x39555


Welcome to eMail News Delivery, a service from Business Wire.
Here is your Industrial Information Resources Inc. news release.
If you have received this in error please send a message to:
eMailDelivery@businesswire.com
with the following command in the body of the message:
 unsubscribe TX-INDUSTRIAL-INFO-RES
If you have questions about this service, please contact your
Business Wire Account Executive or service@businesswire.com

BW2023  NOV 26,2001       2:00 PACIFIC      05:00 EASTERN

( BW)(TX-INDUSTRIAL-INFO-RES) Construction of Mexico's First Privately
Owned Ethylene Complex Hinges On Availability of Feedstock, in an
Advisory by Industrialinfo.com

    Business/Energy Editors

	   HOUSTON--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Nov. 26, 2001--Researched by
Industrialinfo.com (Industrial Information Resources, Inc; Houston).
Corporacion Grupo Serbo (Mexico City) first announced its intent to
construct an estimated $3 billion ethylene and derivatives complex in
Altamira, Tamaulipas earlier this year. Serbo's owner, Sergio Bolanos
Quesada, seeking partners to round out his 20% interest in the
complex, made the announcement shortly after it was revealed that
Serbo was purchasing the beleaguered engineering and construction
firm, Bufete Industrial (Mexico City). From the start, Serbo
understood that Petroleos Mexicanos (Pemex), the state run oil and gas
monopoly, would provide 71,000 barrels per day of naphtha feedstock
for the proposed 975,000 metric ton per year ethylene cracker.
	   Pemex has been slow to sign the 25-year contract sought by Serbo
for the complex it hopes to complete by late 2005. A need to insure
feedstock supply could possibly delay the anticipated early 2002
groundbreaking of the 10-unit complex, which will include propylene,
butadiene, polypropylene and other downstream products, as well as its
own cogeneration unit for electricity and steam. Serbo also has plans
to construct a "city" adjoining the complex, featuring homes, schools,
churches, and hospitals, among many other features over and above
those found in more traditional "company towns."
	   Serbo and its partners hope to sell 95% of the complex's output on
the domestic market, with an estimated 50% going to other
petrochemical companies in Altamira. The heavily industrialized
Altamira is home to plants owned by BASF, Shell, and other chemical
majors. Serbo would have to import its naphtha feedstock if Pemex
fails to comply with their preliminary agreement, as other naphtha
sources are simply not available domestically.
	   "With this stall, Pemex is hurting itself and quite possibly the
future of additional private petrochemical investment in Mexico,"
according to Annette Kreuger, chemical industry specialist with
Industrialinfo.com. "With Mexico's President Vicente Fox making recent
speeches that private investment is the hope for Mexico's
petrochemical future, it doesn't bode well when a state run company is
dragging its feet over its part in a $3 billion investment -- an
investment that not only increases Mexico's protection against an
anticipated surge in foreign petrochemical imports over the next few
years but also offers an increased quality of life for an estimated
2,700 future employees."
	   Industrialinfo.com provides daily news related to the industrial
market place including alerts and databases for the energy and
industrial markets. For more information on trends and upcoming
construction activities for the chemical markets, including
petrochemicals and pharmaceuticals, send inquiries to
chemicalgroup@industrialinfo.com or visit us at www.industrialinfo.com
and www.iirenergy.com.

    --30--HM/ho*

    CONTACT: Industrialinfo.com, Houston
             Trey Hamblet, 713/783-5147

    KEYWORD: TEXAS MEXICO INTERNATIONAL LATIN AMERICA
    INDUSTRY KEYWORD: BUILDING/CONSTRUCTION CHEMICALS/PLASTICS
ENERGY GOVERNMENT
    SOURCE: Industrialinfo.com

For the best viewing of the news releases please
 use the following email settings:  Courier 10 point.
 -Notice of Copyright and General Disclaimer-
 (c) 2000 Business Wire. All of the releases provided by Business Wire
 are protected by copyright and other applicable laws, treaties and
 conventions. Information contained in the releases is furnished by
 Business Wire`s members who are solely responsible for their content,
 accuracy and originality. All reproduction, other than for an
 individual user`s reference, is prohibited without prior written
 permission.

- Notice of Copyright and General Disclaimer --
(c) 1999 Business Wire. All of the releases provided by Business Wire
are protected by copyright and other applicable laws, treaties and
conventions. Information contained in the releases is furnished by
Business Wire`s members who are solely responsible for their content,
accuracy and originality. All reproduction, other than for an
individual user`s reference, is prohibited without prior written
permission.


ISO Market Participants:
Since Trade Month November 2000 (which settled beginning in January 2001),
payment defaults in the ISO markets have caused the ISO to pay less than the
full amount due Scheduling Coordinators (SCs) in the monthly cash clearing
process.  The purpose of this message is to describe the ISO's policies and
procedures in settling the market when defaults occur.
As set forth in Section SABP 6.7.4 of the ISO Tariff, when payment defaults
occur from SCs that have obligations to the ISO's markets (Debtor SCs), the
shortfall is to be prorated to SCs with net amounts due them (Creditor SCs)
based on their outstanding balances. The principles that drive how amounts
are settled and defaults are allocated to Creditor SCs are summarized below:
Proportionate allocation of defaults - The total amount of market defaults
is allocated to the Creditor SCs on a proportionate basis such that each
Creditor SC receives the same percentage of their total net amount
receivable for the month.  SCs are allowed to net the credits and debits on
a monthly basis as described below.  The intent of the Tariff is to
equitably distribute market shortfalls only to those SCs that have net
market receivables for the period.
Each month is treated as a whole period - Final and preliminary invoices are
combined when possible (see exception conditions below) in allocating market
defaults.  Cash payments from the market are received in two stages
(preliminary and final).  At preliminary, market payments are distributed
based on the preliminary amounts due to the Creditor SCs as set forth in the
preliminary invoices. Final invoices serve essentially as true-ups to the
preliminary invoices, and accordingly, payments received at final are
redistributed to the extent possible to achieve true-up allocations for the
whole month considering the combined amounts due the Creditor SCs from both
the preliminary and final invoices.
Each month is treated as a discrete period - Market defaults are generally
allocated to the Creditor SCs that have amounts due for the month being
settled.  The exceptions to this rule involve (1) SCs that are Creditor SCs
in the current month but have default obligations relating to prior periods
or (2) Debtor SCs that pay in the current month but have unpaid balances for
prior months.  In the first instance, the Creditor SC would not be paid to
the extent of default obligations from prior months.  Amounts due to the
Creditor SC would be allocated back to the default period and such proceeds
would be allocated based on remaining amounts still owed for that period. In
the second instance the current month's payment is carried back and applied
first to the oldest outstanding balance. The proceeds would be distributed
to the Creditor SCs for that earlier period based on the Creditor SCs unpaid
balances in that month.  With respect to the carry back of payments to the
earliest period, Pre and Post bankruptcy debts are deemed to be from
different SCs.
GMC defaults are remedied as a first priority on market payments  - GMC is
billed separately from market billings on both preliminary and final
invoices each month.  In the event of payment default on any GMC invoices
(at either preliminary or final), market funds are transferred to satisfy
GMC obligations before any market distributions are made.  This first
priority position for GMC revenues is set forth in Section SABP 6.3.1.3 of
the ISO Tariff.  Therefore, when both GMC and market defaults occur (as has
occurred in each of the past few months), the Creditor SCs have two
reductions to the market clearing amounts ultimately paid - an allocated
portion of the GMC default, and an allocated portion of the market default.
RMR invoices and payments are not affected by market or GMC defaults - The
RMR invoicing process involves amounts due from the PTO's to the RMR Owners
as set forth in monthly invoices processed through the ISO's systems.
However, such amounts are invoiced independent of the ISO's market and GMC
billing processes, and accordingly, market and/or GMC defaults do not impact
RMR related payments.
There are a number of factors that complicate the monthly process of
allocating cash to Creditor SCs when defaults occur.  Some of these factors
include:
*	amounts received after payment date deadlines - such amounts are
typically included in the next distribution
*	market payments due to Creditor SCs that default on GMC in the
current month - such market allocations are reduced by the specific amount
of the GMC default by the Creditor SC
*	allocations to prior months - not made unless the amount exceeds
0.5% of that months billed amounts
*	small invoices under $5,000 are paid in full rather than the
allocated percentage.
For more information about these allocation issues or any other related
matters, please contact Melodie Iverson (916) 351-2174 (e-mail
mkiverson@caiso.com <mailto:miverson@caiso.com> ) or Mike Epstein (916)
351-2314 (e-mail mepstein@caiso.com <mailto:mepstein@caiso.com> ) at the
ISO.

Byron B. Woertz, Jr.
Director, Client Relations
Phone:  (916) 608-7066
Pager:   (800) 481-7037


FGTHas been bought and sold sevaral times.
Rod Hayslett
Office  713-853-6178
Cell     713-201-6135
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)

-----Original Message-----
From: Chandler, Bob <Bob.Chandler@ENRON.com>
To: Hayslett, Rod <Rod.Hayslett@ENRON.com>; Howard, Kevin A. <Kevin.Howard@ENRON.com>; Geaccone, Tracy <Tracy.Geaccone@ENRON.com>; Saunders, James <James.Saunders@ENRON.com>; Corman, Shelley <Shelley.Corman@ENRON.com>
CC: Desai, Jayshree <Jayshree.Desai@ENRON.com>; Walters Jr., Harry <Harry.Walters@ENRON.com>
Sent: Tue Feb 12 14:19:54 2002
Subject: RE: NNG 10 year valuation model

I think the deferred taxes are gone for ratemaking purposes, too.  I'm checking with Patty to see how they are handling with MGT and whether we can identify some specific pipeline names from the IRS letter rulings that Dave Borcyk and Robert Guthrie have provided.   The elimination of the deferred tax liabilities ought to result in a larger rate base calculation, but resulting higher rates would certainly be subject to competitive forces.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hayslett, Rod
Sent:	Tuesday, February 12, 2002 2:01 PM
To:	Howard, Kevin A.; Chandler, Bob; Geaccone, Tracy; Saunders, James; Corman, Shelley
Cc:	Desai, Jayshree; Walters Jr., Harry; Guthrie, Robert
Subject:	RE: NNG 10 year valuation model

Have to be careful that you don't lose historical data for rate purposes.
Rod Hayslett
Office  713-853-6178
Cell     713-201-6135
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)

-----Original Message-----
From: Howard, Kevin A. <Kevin.Howard@ENRON.com>
To: Chandler, Bob <Bob.Chandler@ENRON.com>; Hayslett, Rod <Rod.Hayslett@ENRON.com>; Geaccone, Tracy <Tracy.Geaccone@ENRON.com>; Saunders, James <James.Saunders@ENRON.com>; Corman, Shelley <Shelley.Corman@ENRON.com>
CC: Desai, Jayshree <Jayshree.Desai@ENRON.com>; Walters Jr., Harry <Harry.Walters@ENRON.com>; Guthrie, Robert <Robert.Guthrie@ENRON.com>
Sent: Tue Feb 12 13:57:58 2002
Subject: RE: NNG 10 year valuation model

Tax gave us the same feedback. Davis had not yet updated the model for this.
Thanks.
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)

-----Original Message-----
From: Chandler, Bob <Bob.Chandler@ENRON.com>
To: Howard, Kevin A. <Kevin.Howard@ENRON.com>; Hayslett, Rod <Rod.Hayslett@ENRON.com>; Geaccone, Tracy <Tracy.Geaccone@ENRON.com>; Saunders, James <James.Saunders@ENRON.com>; Corman, Shelley <Shelley.Corman@ENRON.com>
CC: Desai, Jayshree <Jayshree.Desai@ENRON.com>; Walters Jr., Harry <Harry.Walters@ENRON.com>; Guthrie, Robert <Robert.Guthrie@ENRON.com>
Sent: Tue Feb 12 13:54:03 2002
Subject: RE: NNG 10 year valuation model

Maybe I'm not looking at this appropriately, but why didn't the deferred taxes on the balance sheet disappear as of the date of sale to Dynegy?  My understanding is that the Option provided for a Section 338h10 basis step-up.  That would result in NNG's paying off its deferred taxes as of the transfer date.  I'm particularly interested in knowing how NNG will pay those taxes given that the note with Corporate can only be reduced to $240MM plus accrued dividends.  That tax election complicates the accounting significantly.

		 -----Original Message-----
		From: 	Howard, Kevin A.
		Sent:	Tuesday, February 12, 2002 10:35 AM
		To:	Hayslett, Rod; Geaccone, Tracy; Chandler, Bob; Saunders, James; Corman, Shelley
		Cc:	Desai, Jayshree
		Subject:	NNG 10 year valuation model

		I met with Jayshree Desai this morning to discuss the recommended changes to the NNG valuation model.  She will make these and circulate the model later today.  I few items worth mentioning -

		1) Capex assumptions still seem too high for 2002-2004.  However, the 2002 number is some $30 million below the "Dynegy transition" capex amount shown in the 2002 Capex schedule.  Can we just assume non-discretionary only with the Base Gas repurchase in 2002/2003? Any discretionary would be commercially-driven.
		2) Keep O&M flat to 2001 numbers?
		3) Tracy / Shelley - Any thoughts on how to incorporate the contract info to better analyze the "contract roll off" scenarios? We have just assumed the 2002 Plan with 1-2% growth rate going forward with a new rate case in effect in 2005. Rod, not sure how you want to look at rate case assumptions or expansion opportunities but we can discuss tomorrow.  Recognizing the volume of NNG contract info and the time constraint we are under, there may or may not be any better alternative.
		4) Rod - we have assumed an equity infusion of $175 million to re-capitalized NNG to more "reasonable" levels.  I can reduce the amount to $112,500,000 which is the Citibank prepay amount allocated to NNG if that sounds reasonable.
		5) We will show a reduction in A/R of $1.807 billion and a corresponding reduction in equity due to the MCTJ loan.

		Any thoughts you have on the above items would be very helpful.  We are trying to send out the info memo by the end of the week.  This model will be the basis for the NNG valuation.

		Thanks,
		Kevin


This one is due Monday!  Lots of notice.

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 06/03/2001 11:08 PM -----

	"Borchardt, Tiffaney" <TBorchardt@caiso.com>
	06/01/2001 05:50 PM

		 To: ISO Market Participants
<IMCEAEX-_O=CAISO_OU=CORPORATE_CN=DISTRIBUTION+20LISTS_CN=ISO+20MARKET+20PARTI
CIPANTS@caiso.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Amendment of the CPUC subpoena for production on June 4 with mont
hly updates, and clarification on confidential treatment

To Market Participants and Scheduling Coordinators:

Today the ISO received an amendment to the subpoena from the California
Public Utilities Commission ("CPUC")  issued May 25 (and circulated to
Market Participants on that date) and requiring a response by June 4.  The
subpoena of May 25 and the amendment require monthly updates on an ongoing
basis. The ISO intends to comply with the monthly update requirement.  In
addition, the ISO received a letter from the CPUC clarifying the
confidential treatment it will afford confidential information produced in
response to the subpeona and amendment.  The May 25 subpoena and the
amendment and letter on confidentiality are attached.

In its June 4 production and subsequent monthly updates, the ISO will mark
as confidential documents it produces to the CPUC that contain information
subject to 20.3.2, and will request confidential treatment in accordance
with the CPUC's letter on confidentiality. Concerns related to the subpoena
should be relayed directly to the California Public Utilities Commission.
The CPUC contact related to the subpoena is Robert Cagen who can be reached
at (415) 703-2197.   The ISO would appreciate being notified also of any
concerns.  The ISO contacts are Jeanne Sol, at jsole@caiso.com and Norma
Formanek at  <mailto:nformanek@fbm.com> nformanek@fbm.com both of whom
should be copied on correspondence.

Jeanne M. Sol,
Regulatory Counsel
California ISO
(916) 608-7144
____________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________

The Foregoing e-Mail Communication (Together With Any Attachments Thereto)
Is Intended For The Designated Recipient(s) Only. Its Terms May Be
Confidential And Protected By Attorney/Client Privilege or Other Applicable
Privileges.  Unauthorized Use, Dissemination, Distribution, Or Reproduction
Of This Message Is Strictly Prohibited.

 - CPUC May 25 Subp.pdf
 - CPUC Subpoena.pdf


Sorry, I did not include these with this morning's distribution.

Individual.com, Mon, 3/26:  "Assembly Investigates Gas Prices"

Individual.com, Mon, 3/26:  "Calif. May See Rise in Power Bills"

Individual.com, Mon, 3/26:  "BPA to Link New Generation to Northwest Energy
Grid"

Individual.com, Mon, 3/26:  "[B] Enron says sale of utility Portland General
is unlikely (Wrap)"
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Assembly Investigates Gas Prices

By DON THOMPSON
Associated Press Writer
SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) via NewsEdge Corporation  -
State lawmakers began investigating
Friday whether market manipulation helped drive up California's
natural gas prices, hearing from a consumer who spoke of the
``terrific shock'' she got from a recent bill.

Natural gas costs six times more in California than in other
states, said Assemblyman Darrell Steinberg, chairman of the
Assembly Energy Oversight Subcommittee.

Natural gas that sells for $5.25 elsewhere sells for nearly $30
at the California border, said Steinberg, D-Sacramento.

``We're going to examine every possible reason for the price
spike,'' he said.

The hearing by Steinberg's subcommittee and the Natural Gas
Costs and Availability Subcommittee opened with testimony from
utility customers.

Gladys Cook of Sacramento told the committee her Pacific Gas and
Electric Co. natural gas bill rose from about $47 or $57 a month
last year at this time to $344.63 in February and $112 this month.

``It was just a terrific shock, especially after the Christmas
holiday and everything,'' said Cook, who lives with her 87-year-old
mother, a retired teacher. Cook said they turned down the heat and
water heater to try to reduce their bills.

Officials from PG&E, Long Beach Energy, San Diego Gas & Electric
and Southern California Gas were also expected to testify.

Lawsuits filed this week by Long Beach and Los Angeles accuse
several utility companies of meeting at a Phoenix hotel in 1996 and
deciding to block construction of gas pipelines that could have
helped the state avoid its power crisis. The companies deny any
collusion.

High natural gas prices are just one factor in the state's
energy crisis.

A tight electricity supply, caused in part by maintenance at
California power plants and scarce hydroelectricity in the Pacific
Northwest, has contributed to rolling blackouts four times this
year, including twice statewide this week.

The hearing comes on the heels of a state audit released
Thursday that says California's 1996 deregulation law encourages
market manipulation by electricity buyers and sellers.

And the California Independent System Operator, which oversees
most of the state's power grid, told the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission that electricity suppliers have overcharged it and the
state Power Exchange at least $6.2 billion since May for power the
two bought on behalf of utilities.

The excessive charges will continue during high demand this
summer unless the commission steps in, the ISO said. The ISO buys
emergency electricity to avoid blackouts.

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, which Gov. Gray Davis
and many lawmakers contend isn't doing enough to control
California's energy prices, declined to send a representative to
the Assembly hearings. However, other regulators were slated to
testify.

The state Senate plans hearings next month to investigate
whether electricity suppliers withheld power to raise prices.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Calif. May See Rise in Power Bills

By JENNIFER COLEMAN
Associated Press Writer
SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) via NewsEdge Corporation  -
The state's power purchases for two
struggling utilities could cost $23 billion by the end of next
year, leaving customers paying at least 50 percent more for
electricity, The Associated Press has learned.

State officials told several key legislators Friday that the
state's efforts to help credit-poor Southern California Edison and
Pacific Gas and Electric Co. could hit $23 billion by 2003, a
legislative source told the AP on condition of anonymity.

That's far more than lawmakers and Gov. Gray Davis estimated
when they approved legislation authorizing the state's power
purchases.

At the time, they projected they would need $10 billion in
revenue bonds to buy power for the two utilities over a decade. The
bonds would be repaid by the utilities' customers over several
years.

Davis has said repeatedly he is confident the state's power
crisis can be resolved without further rate hikes, but the source
said cabinet secretary Susan Kennedy, Finance Director Tim Gage and
Deputy Chief of Staff John Stevens all warned lawmakers that
customers' rates would have to be raised at least 50 percent to
cover the new projections.

That increase would come on top of a 9 percent to 15 percent
increase the Public Utilities Commission approved in January, as
well as an additional 10 percent increase already scheduled for
next year.

Davis spokesman Steve Maviglio confirmed that Kennedy spoke with
top Democrats on Friday but declined to elaborate.

The source said the calculations were by the administration, not
the PUC, which would have to implement any rate increases.
Lawmakers weren't told over what time frame such an increase would
need to be implemented, the source said.

Consumer advocate Harvey Rosenfield of the Foundation for
Taxpayer and Consumer Rights promised a rebellion at the ballot box
in 2002 if rates continued to rise.

``If this goes through, this is the beginning of the ratepayers'
revolt,'' he said.

The PUC is expected on Tuesday to address how customer rates
will be divided between the state and the utilities.

SoCal Edison and PG&E both have pushed for rate increases, and
PG&E has said its current rates would be insufficient to cover its
bills and the state's. Both say they've lost more than $13 billion
since summer due to high wholesale electricity costs that
California's 1996 deregulation law prevents them from collecting
from their customers.

PG&E's and Edison's credit was cut off by electricity
wholesalers in January, and the state has been spending $40 million
to $50 million a day since then to keep the lights on for their
customers _ about $4.2 billion in taxpayer money so far.

State Controller Kathleen Connell warned this week that the
state's power-buying is gutting California's budget surplus and
putting the state at financial risk. Wall Street has also been
wary. The Standard & Poor's credit-rating agency put the state on a
credit watch ``with negative implications'' when the power
purchases began.

California has faced an energy crunch for months, fueled by high
natural gas prices, soaring wholesale electricity costs and a tight
power supply due in part to California plant maintenance and scarce
hydroelectric power in the Pacific Northwest.

The Assembly on Friday opened hearings into the skyrocketing
natural gas costs that will include an investigation into whether
market manipulation helped drive up prices.

Pacific Gas and Electric Co. customer Gladys Cook of Sacramento
told the committee her natural gas bill rose from about $50 a month
last year at this time to $344 in February and $112 this month.

``It was just a terrific shock, especially after the Christmas
holiday and everything,'' she said.

Natural gas that sells for $5.25 elsewhere sells for nearly $30
at the California border, said Assemblyman Darrell Steinberg,
chairman of the Assembly Energy Oversight Subcommittee.

The cities of Los Angeles and Long Beach filed lawsuits this
week accusing several gas companies of conspiring to drive up
prices by limiting supply. The lawsuits say the companies decided
in a Phoenix hotel room in 1996 to block construction of gas
pipelines that could have helped the state avoid its power crisis.

Rick Morrow, vice president of customer service for Southern
California Gas Co., denied executives at the meeting were
conspiring to drive up gas prices.

``There was no mystery to the meeting,'' he said. ``What is
being alleged is absolutely false.''
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------

BPA to Link New Generation to Northwest Energy Grid

PORTLAND, Ore., March 23 /PRNewswire/  via NewsEdge Corporation  -
The Bonneville Power
Administration signed agreements with Goldendale Energy Inc. this week to
connect the power from a proposed 248-megawatt gas-fired combustion turbine to
the Northwest energy grid.

"BPA is eager to act quickly to bring a new power resource online at a
time when the Northwest and the entire West Coast are suffering from an
extreme shortage of energy," said BPA's Acting Administrator Steve Wright.
"This project can help meet the Northwest's energy needs as well as help
contribute to bringing down high energy costs."

The Goldendale Energy Project is to be built in Goldendale, Wash. The
developers expect to have the new combustion turbine plant running by
July 2002. The merchant plant will sell its output into the wholesale market.
Some power may serve the nearby Goldendale Aluminum Smelter.

In the agreement signed between BPA and Goldendale Energy Inc., the energy
company will pay BPA $1.6 million to construct, operate and maintain a
230-kilovolt terminal at BPA's Harvalum Substation. Klickitat County Public
Utility District will build a new 9.2 mile transmission line from the
generation project to the substation. The terminal will make it possible for
the new power to be integrated into the Federal Columbia River Transmission
System. BPA has agreed to have the terminal operational by Jan. 15, 2002.

SOURCE  Bonneville Power Administration

CONTACT:  Mike Hansen of Bonneville Power Administration, 503-230-4328
Web site:  http://www.bpa.gov
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------
[B] Enron says sale of utility Portland General is unlikely (Wrap)

New York, March 23 (BridgeNews) - Enron Corp. said its proposed sale of

Oregon utility Portland General Electric Co. will probably be dropped because
a
California law prevents buyer Sierra Pacific Resources from selling power
plants to fund the purchase.

The company's President and Chief Executive Officer Jeff Skilling said
during a phone conference Friday that there is only a 5% chance that it will
be
able to sell PGE. He added that Enron is not in a rush to sell the Oregon
utility since it is a profitable business.

Nevada electric utility Sierra Pacific agreed to buy PGE for $3.1 billion
in cash and assumed debt in November 1999, and the transaction was expected to
close in the second half of 2000. Enron decided to sell PGE since a regulated
utility no longer fit with its strategy to buy and sell energy on wholesale
markets.

But a new California law that prevents power generators from selling power
plants has stalled the deal. Sierra Pacific, which has some operations in
California, intended to sell some of its plants to AES Corp. finance the
acquisition.

The Nevada Legislature also is considering a moratorium on power plant
sales, according to Sierra Pacific spokeswoman Faye Anderson. She said Sierra
Pacific is still confident the deal will close by the end of the second
quarter.

Enron also said it will begin trading a liquefied natural gas contract on
its Enron Energy Services Web site this summer. The LNG business in North
America has been booming in the last year, and Skilling said he expects it
will
continue to improve as U.S. natural gas supplies are squeezed.

Skilling said Enron still expects to earn between $1.75 and $1.78 per share
this year. He also said the company's fundamentals are sound, and he doesn't
understand why the stock has fallen to the $50s from a high of $90.75 in
August.

"It's a bad market, but Enron is in good shape,"  Skilling said.

On Friday, shares of Enron rose nearly 8% to close at $59.40.  End

[slug: ENRON-PORTLAND-GENL]


Jennifer,

Phillip Allen and Keith Holst indicated that the curve changes in question
for Socal was simply due to a higher forward market.  Let me know if you have
any further questions.

DG
---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 03/05/2001
10:31 AM ---------------------------

Jeffrey C Gossett
02/28/2001 02:03 PM
To: Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam
Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: January Gas Curve Validation

Please get responses for these back to Jennifer today.

Thanks
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT on 02/28/2001
02:00 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Jennifer Nguyen @ ENRON                           02/27/2001 04:15 PM

To: Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: January Gas Curve Validation

Jeff --

Before I send out the memo for January, I have a few questions about 3 curves
that were reviewed this month.  Attached are Powerpoint slides containg the
10 curves that were validated for January.  The ones I'm asking you to take a
look at are:

1)  NGI-SOCAL -- Why the upshift for the entire curve compared to prior
month?  Why has the shape of the curve changed from (approximately) 1/1/04
forward compared to the curve from prior month?

2)  IF-MONCHY -- What factors account for differences between the 1/31/01
curve vs. the 12/29/00 curve for the period between 1/1/01through 1/1/07?

3)  IF-TRANSCO Z3 --  What factors account for the entire curve changing so
dramatically from last month to this month?

Thanks for your help.

Jennifer


I will be handling the derivatives side of the ETOL transaction this time so
future communications should probably come to me directly.  I will be
reviewing the ISDA draft this weekend and it would be helpful if I could get
some sort of description of the overall transaction.  Is there a term sheet
or executive summary of the deal?  If so, my fax # is (713)646-3490.


Bob, please respond to Bill.  Thank you. Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kefalas, Bill
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 9:09 AM
To:	Jim Derrick@ENRON
Subject:	RE: Important Announcement Regarding Document Preservation

Does this include the suspension of the automatic email deletion policy?
Bill

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Enron Announcements/Corp/Enron@ENRON   On Behalf Of Jim Derrick@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 11:55 PM
To:	All Enron Worldwide@ENRON
Subject:	Important Announcement Regarding Document Preservation

As you know, Enron, its directors, and certain current and former officers are defendants in litigation in Federal and State court involving the LJM partnerships.

Enron has employed counsel and they will represent Enron and its interests in the litigation.

Under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act, we are required to preserve documents that might be used in the litigation.

Accordingly, our normal document destruction policies are suspended immediately and shall remain suspended until further notice.

Please retain all documents (which include handwritten notes, recordings, e-mails, and any other method of information recording) that in any way relate to the Company's related party transactions with LJM 1 and LJM 2, including, but not limited to, the formation of these partnerships, any transactions or discussions with the partnerships or its agents, and Enron's accounting for these transactions.

You should know that this document preservation requirement is a requirement of Federal law and you could be individually liable for civil and criminal penalties if you fail to follow these instructions.

You should know that Enron will defend these lawsuits vigorously.  In the meantime, you should not discuss matters related to the lawsuits with anyone other than the appropriate persons at Enron and its counsel.

If you have any questions, please contact Jim Derrick at 713-853-5550.


NEW DIALING INSTRUCTIONS

To:          All Enron Houston Users

Subject:   New Dialing Instructions

Ref:   Tie Line Access Code Changes - Enron Houston Users

Just a reminder, the access codes for remote locations were modified within the Enron Building phone system.  The modifications will affect users as follows:

1.        We have changed the first digit dialed when accessing the Tie Lines from 7 to 8.  This change will only affect Enron Building users.
2.        The second and third digits of the London, Calgary, Omaha, and Portland tie lines have also changed.  This change will affect all users.  All other digits of existing dial strings will remain the same.  For your reference, a list of the new dial strings is identified in the table below.

REVISED DIAL STRINGS FOR ENRON TIE LINE NETWORK
Users must dial 8 digits to call via Tie Lines

Enron Location	Old String	New String
Beijing	7 810 XXXX	8 810 XXXX
Buenos Aires	7 900 XXXX	8 900 XXXX
Calgary	7 403 XXXX	8 283 XXXX
Caracas	7 58 XXXXX	8 58 XXXXX
Chicago	7 220 XXXX	8 220 XXXX
Dahbol India	7 812 XXXX	8 812 XXXX
Hinsdale	7 235 XXXX	8 235 XXXX
London	7 830 XXXXX	8 44 XXXXX
Monterey	7 152 2XXX	8 152 2XXX
New York	7 212 XXXX	8 212 XXXX
New York Metals	7 211 XXXX	8 211 XXXX
Omaha	7 87 XXXX	8 287 XXXX
Portland	7 834 XXXX	8 234 XXXX
Rio De Janiero	7 920 XXXX	8 920 XXXX
Sao Paulo	7 910 XXXX	8 910 XXXX
Sydney	7 800 XXXX	8 800 XXXX
Tokyo	7 860 XXXX	8 860 XXXX
Toronto	7 285 XXXX	8 285 XXXX
Washington DC (Future)	N/A	8 245 XXXX

* X represents an extension number


Every year, a holiday gift is sent from the Executive Committee and is
normally a donation to a charity of Enron's choice.  This year, we have tried
a different approach. Elyse Kalmans and Kathy Mayfield from Community
Relations recommended an on-line service called Chairtygift.com.  Each
recipient can select the charity of their choice from many hundreds in the
United States.  Should they choose to not go on-line and select a charity,
the amount of that person's gift will default to DePelchin.  Kathy is
receiving thank you notes by e-mail so I wanted to share with you.

Rosie
---------------------- Forwarded by Rosalee Fleming/Corp/Enron on 12/12/2000
02:04 PM ---------------------------

Kathy Mayfield
12/12/2000 11:01 AM

To: Rosalee Fleming/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Thank you for the Charitygift

I have received two other thank you notes for the Charitygifts.  Upon
redemption, there is a place for recipients to send a thank you via email and
currently I am set up as the person to receive them.  Is that ok?  I don't
mind and can forward them to you as I get them or save them and get them to
you all at once.  It's great feedback and I think Ken would enjoy seeing
their responses.  It seems as though people are enjoying getting them and
being able to choose one of their favorite charities.  Let me know what you
think.  I am also drafting a letter to go to DePelchin letting them know that
we are doing this.  Would you like for it to come from Ken?  Thanks, Kathy

---------------------- Forwarded by Kathy Mayfield/Corp/Enron on 12/12/2000
10:27 AM ---------------------------

Kewp76@aol.com on 12/11/2000 07:51:30 PM
To: kathy.mayfield@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Thank you for the Charitygift

Kathy,
Eileen and I were most pleased to have the opportunity to donate to Southern
Tier (NY) Hospice Corporation via the Charity Gift Card that Enron Executive
Committee sent us.  Enron displays uncommon leadership in humanitarian
activities as well as the business world.  Our thanks go to Ken and the
Executive Committee.
Very truly yours,
Buddy and Eileen Leech


Dear Ben Rogers,

You have been invited to participate in a deal on DealBench, sponsored by
Enron for Caledonia.

You are about to experience firsthand our secure platform that enables
clients to conduct their business on the web. We provide a collaborative
environment to share documents, conduct auctions, host webcasts, manage deal
information and monitor deal progress - instantly, efficiently and
effectively.

In order to be able to view the deal, you have to update your user profile
with the deal key: 9703513032423707. This will enable you to view the deal
and participate in the process.  Please also remember that this deal key is
specific to the above deal.

We are looking forward to working with you.

If you have any questions or are unable to access the system, please email us
at: Webmaster@DealBench.com or call us at: +1-713-853-9438.

We encourage your feedback on both the platform and service, either via email
or telephone.

Kind regards,

WebMaster
DealBench


Beth Cherry
___________
Sr. Creative Consultant
EnFORM Technology
713.350.1860

-----Original Message-----
From: Lindner, Fred
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 11:24 AM
To: Robinson, Misty; Landry, Ashley; Cherry, Beth
Subject: FW: Funny Taliban Animation
Fred Lindner
Se?or Creative Consultant
EnFORM Technology
713.350.1826
fred@enform.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Guerrero, Ralph
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 11:18 AM
To: Cervantes, Anthony; Lindner, Fred; Nguyen, Viet; Nguyen, Michael; Neustadt, Mike; Yentur, Can
Subject: FW: Funny Taliban Animation http://members.sigecom.net/theclan/Taliban.html


There is a demand charge of  $-.22 x 900000 on this deal ticket.  I think the
demand charge should be $-.22 x 10,000 x # days on the month.  This equals
900,000 over the term of the deal.  I changed the demand charge volume to
310,000  for Dec
310,000 for Jan
280,000 for Feb

Audrey, the global contract is 96017642 and 12/2000 is the first month of
this deal.  We should receive and invoice from COH for the demand charge.
There is a very slim chance we will be selling COH any gas on this deal for
the month.  Would you forward this email to the person that handles COH?

Thanks
chris

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 12/05/2000 08:08
AM ---------------------------

Chris Germany
12/04/2000 01:56 PM
To: Kimat Singla/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alvin Thompson/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: CGAS deal 213360

ENA has a put to COH (deal 213360) for up to 10,000 dth/day.  This deal was
in the system for December and I just took it to 0 for the whole month.  I
estimate we should make about $495,000 on the deal change.

Kimat, this deal also has a demand charge that ENA pays COH for the put.  I
believe its in the deal correctly.

Alvin, please show this on the morning sheet as a "Put to COH at IF" or
something real intelligent like that.

This deal goes thru 2/28/01.


Hi Kevin,
This is great!  Yes I will follow-up with Dave regarding the article. I do
recall the discussion. He is out of the office today, but I will check with
him on Monday.  Thanks!

-----Original Message-----
From: Hyatt, Kevin [mailto:Kevin.Hyatt@ENRON.com]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 10:06 AM
To: Carrie Shapiro (E-mail)
Subject: GE Presenter for NGI subcommittee
Importance: High

Carrie
	Mr. Colin Wilkes from General Electric Power Systems has agreed
to present for NGI Session C on 3/20.  He will cover two topics
including "Changing gas quality specs and their impact to turbines" and
"Pressure Reliability".  He is preparing his initial draft which should
be available in the next two weeks.

Please forward to him a conference invitation at your earliest
convenience.  Contact info is as follows:

Mr. Colin Wilkes
General Electric
Building 40, Room 517
1 River Road
Schenectady, NY  12345
518-385-7538

colin.wilkes@ps.ge.com

Also, when you, me and Dave met at the P.O. DoubleTree, Dave mentioned
an article he saw dealing with LNG gas specs and their impact to gen
units.  He was going to try and get me a copy of the article and check
into whether or not the author would want to present at the conference
(at least that's my recollection).  Can you follow up with Dave to see
if he's had any success?

thanks
kh

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Thanks.

Vince J Kaminski@ECT
01/11/2000 08:01 AM
To: Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Congratulations

Rick,

I have just looked at the memo regarding promotions.
Congratulations - well deserved.

Vince


Sorry about the last email...hadn't read this one yet.

Linda J Noske
04/17/2001 06:07 PM
To:	Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:	Disregard earlier e-mail.............wrong Susan........sorry.


Dude,
Not seeing (either of) the comments directly, its hard to say what our
position should be -- Mr. Dasovich, I'll leave that up to your good
judgment.  However, it would appear that TURN is looking to roll back the
clock on any progress we might have made in the GIR process to separate
utility services and make them independently available to the marketplace.
On that basis, I'd say you've got a reasonable argument to make.

As far as Transwestern is concerned, I'd say that, as a general matter, we
oppose any change in regulations that would attempt to repackage or rebundle
utility services that gives the effect of reducing customer choice.  On the
other hand, given the backdrop of a frustrated effort in the GIR proceeding,
as long as they're leaving Hector Road alone, its hard for me to get too
fired up about anything in California these days.

Let us know if there is anything you'd like us to do here.  Ours is but to
serve, my liege.

Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 4:22 PM
To: Fawcett, Jeffery; Scott, Susan
Subject: FYI

Greetings Mr. Newlywed and Ms Bride-to-be!  (Shewt, I'm gettin' all choked
up.)

I think I'll need to protest TURN's proposal.  You folks aware of this?  Care?

Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 03/20/2001 04:20 PM -----

	"Daniel Douglass" <Douglass@ArterHadden.com> 03/20/2001 03:37 PM 	   To:
<Barbara_Klemstine@apsc.com>, <Vicki_Sandler@apses.com>, <berry@apx.com>,
<dcazalet@apx.com>, <billr@calpine.com>, <jackp@calpine.com>,
<Ken_Czarnecki@calpx.com>, <gavaughn@duke-energy.com>,
<rjhickok@duke-energy.com>, <gtbl@dynegy.com>, <jmpa@dynegy.com>,
<jdasovic@enron.com>, <susan_j_mara@enron.com>, <Tamara_Johnson@enron.com>,
<curt.Hatton@gen.pge.com>, <foothill@lmi.net>, <camiessn@newwestenergy.com>,
<jcgardin@newwestenergy.com>, <jsmollon@newwestenergy.com>,
<rsnichol@newwestenergy.com>, <nam.nguyen@powersrc.com>,
<Curtis_L_Kebler@reliantenergy.com>  cc:   Subject: FYI

On 2/14, the Southern California Generator Coalition filed a petmod asking
that the Commission amend winter balancing rules to allow customers to bring
more gas into the system than the 10% imbalance rules permit and that
customers be allowed to use the previous month's accumulated positive
imbalance in lieu of flowing supplies.

The generator members of WPTF with facilities in southern California may be
interested in knowing that TURN's 3/15 comments recommend instead that the
Commission should rebundle the costs of storage for electric generators in
their transportation rates and requires SoCalGas to store gas on behalf of
those customers.

Let me know if you want to see the TURN comments.

Dan


To register your Palm Computingc organizer electronically, you must have an
Internet connection or a modem connected to your computer.

Or if you prefer, you can fill out and send the mail-in registration card
included in your Palm Computing package.

Special rewards only for registered users:

-FREE software programs *
-FREE technical support **
-Upgrade information
-Important updates

* For a complete list of free software, go to www.palm.com/eregdownload
** Subject to change without notice


Michael,

I had a family emergency that I had to attend to prior to the holidays.  So I apologize, I haven't been in town.  Not sure what happened with our pre-arranged days to have discussions with your prospect, but hopefully we can reschedule.  Considering my situation now with my family, I will not be looking for a re-location anytime soon, but rather something either in Portland or within the West.  If Exelon is willing to explore opportunities with that in mind, then please set some time aside to discuss.  You can continue to reach me either at home (360-834-3579) or at work (503-464-3807).  I no longer have a cell phone available at this time.  Thank you for your time.  Hope your holidays were good.

Regards,

Diana Scholtes

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Kane [mailto:mkane@jobmenu.com]
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 10:50 AM
To: Scholtes, Diana
Subject: Re:

Diana,

Trying to reach you - should we arrange conversation tomorrow with Exelon or
pull the plug they have called us 3 times to coordinate- please give me some
feedback.
Michael P. Kane
Kane & Associates
mkane@jobmenu.com
713-977-3600
----- Original Message -----
From: Scholtes, Diana <Diana.Scholtes@ENRON.com>
To: <mkane@jobmenu.com>
Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2001 10:53 AM

I received your message and those times are good for me.  I will be in
contact with you next week.

Regards,

Diana Scholtes

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


---------------------- Forwarded by Judy Townsend/HOU/ECT on 12/13/2000 07:58
AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Ken Lay @ ENRON                           12/13/2000 06:01 AM

Sent by: Enron Announcements@ENRON
To: All Enron Worldwide
cc:
Subject: Succession Plan

It is my great pleasure to announce that the Board has accepted my
recommendation to appoint Jeff Skilling as chief executive officer, effective
at the time of their next board meeting on February 12, 2001.  Jeff will also
retain his duties as president and chief operating officer.  I will continue
as chairman of the Board and will remain at Enron, working with Jeff on the
strategic direction of the company and our day-to-day global operations.

Jeff will assume the role at a time when the company is hitting on all
cylinders and is positioned for phenomenal growth.  He is clearly ready for
the job, and after 15 years as CEO of this great company, I,m ready for a
somewhat different role.

Our succession plan has been clear for some time.  This has afforded Jeff and
me the freedom to combine our strengths toward building a company that
continues to exceed everyone,s expectations, including our own.  We look
forward to furthering that relationship as Jeff expands his role.

There are no plans for any other changes in our management team nor broad
shifts in strategy and direction.

Please join me in congratulating Jeff.  I look forward to a great 2001.


----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 09/06/2000 04:01 PM -----

	Mary Cook
	09/06/2000 02:52 PM

		 To: Ryan Siurek/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Andrea V Reed/HOU/ECT@ECT, AnnMarie Tiller/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Julia H
Chin/NA/Enron@Enron, Julia Murray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kristina Mordaunt/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications@ENRON, Ryan Siurek/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sara
Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stuart Zisman/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Vaulation Date Raptor Language: RUSH

Everyone, please advise if Ryan's change is acceptable.

Enron North America Corp.
Mary Cook
1400 Smith, 38th Floor, Legal
Houston, Texas   77002-7361
(713) 345-7732 (phone)
(713) 646-3490 (fax)
mary.cook@enron.com

	Ryan Siurek@ENRON
	09/06/2000 02:31 PM

		 To: Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julia H Chin/NA/Enron@Enron, Kristina
Mordaunt/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, AnnMarie
Tiller/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ryan Siurek/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Andrea V
Reed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julia Murray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Vaulation Date Raptor Language: RUSH

Mary,

Per your e-mail, I would like to delete (ii) in the defininition of
"reasonably withheld" as there is only one party that has a possibility to
have a material unhedged position (ie. Enron).

Thanks,

Ryan

The (i) Termination Date and (ii) each date specified as such in a written
notice from either party to the other party with respect to a designated
Number of Shares specified in the notice (the "Notice"), to which the party
receiving such notice consents, which consent shall not be unreasonably
withheld.  For purposes of this Confirmation, the parties agree that consent
shall be deemed reasonably withheld (i) if the party receiving the Notice has
a reasonable business purpose for maintaining the Transaction (excluding any
business purpose relating specifically to the existing or anticipated value
of the Transaction or any other Transaction subject to the Agreement) or (ii)
if consenting to the Notice would result in a material unhedged exposure or
liability for the party receiving the Notice.  For the avoidance of doubt, a
Notice shall be sent from either party to the other party on the Termination
Date.

---------------------- Forwarded by Ryan Siurek/Corp/Enron on 09/06/2000
02:25 PM ---------------------------

MARY COOK@ECT
09/06/2000 01:06 PM
To: Julia H Chin/NA/Enron@Enron, Kristina Mordaunt/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, AnnMarie Tiller/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ryan
Siurek/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Andrea V Reed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julia Murray/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Vaulation Date Raptor Language:  RUSH

Kristina, please forward as you deem necessary to EBS persons for final
approval.  Thank you.

Please see attached language concerning the Raptor swaps in respect of the
Valuation Date mechanism and advise me as soon as possible of your approval
or comments, if any.  We are trying to finalize all public swaps (save Active
Power) today, so your timeliness will be GREATLY appreciated by me!  Mary


Bob,

I finished the draft of  Summary to be included in "Statement of Work" document.

I would like to finish all the paper work this week so that DA and DBA can start to set
up the data mining data base.

Zimin


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 02/16/2001
05:27 PM ---------------------------

"Btu" <subs@Btu.net> on 02/16/2001 04:21:08 PM
To: "Btu's Weekly Power Report" <>
cc:
Subject: Btu's Weekly Power Report

Attached is the latest issue of Btu's Weekly Power Report

e-mail: info@Btu.net
phone: 732-758-8222
fax: 732-758-8286

 - wp021901.pdf