Please do not reply to this e-mail.

You are receiving this message because you have an unresolved invoice in your
iBuyit Payables in-box
that is past due.  Please login to iBuyit Payables and resolve this invoice
as soon as possible.

To launch iBuyit Payables, click on the link below:
http://iBuyitPayables.enron.com
Note:  Your iBuyit Payables User ID and Password are your eHRonline/SAP
Personnel ID and Password.

First time iBuyit Payables user?  For training materials, click on the link
below:
http://sap.enron.com/sap_doclib/user/file_list.asp?cabinet_id=265

Need help?
Please contact the ISC Call Center at (713) 345-4727.


As you will see this has now been finalised and is attached below.
---------------------- Forwarded by Paul Simons/LON/ECT on 08/05/2000 16:35
---------------------------

Ali Lloyd
08/05/2000 09:44
To: Paul Simons/LON/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Diana
Higgins/LON/ECT@ECT, Janine Juggins/LON/ECT@ECT, Richard Lewis/LON/ECT@ECT,
Eric Gadd/LON/ECT@ECT, Rob Bayley/LON/ECT@ECT, Simon Hastings/LON/ECT@ECT,
ECT London UK Power Trading, Peter Morris/LON/ECT@ECT, Gail Hill/LON/ECT@ECT,
Jonathan Bond/LON/ECT@ECT, James New/LON/ECT@ECT, David
Hutchinson/LON/ECT@ECT, Paul Dawson/Govt. Affairs/LON/ECT@ECT, Lee
Munden/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Grid Trade Master Agreement

Attached is a copy of the final version of the new Grid Trade Master
Agreement developed by Allen & Overy on behalf of the UK Electricity Industry
(specifically the EFA Association).  The agreement is designed to replace the
EFA Standard Terms and Condition as the standard contract for OTC electricity
trading post-NETA.  The agreement is for physical delivery 'on the system'
achieved by notification of Energy Contract Volumes to BSC Co.  (Hence it is
similar to the NBP Contract in gas).  The agreement is heavily influenced by
ISDA language.

Enron (through Paul Simons and others) has contributed significantly to the
development of this contract.  Hence I would hope we are happy to trade on it
unamended.  However if anyone has any significant concerns about the contract
or would like us to agree any extra clauses bilaterally with counterparties
then please speak now (by the end of this week) or forever hold your peace.

Later this month we will begin the process of signing up with
counterparties.  With each party we need to agree a number of items as
follows (see Schedule 2):

Who acts as no the ECV Notification Agent (can be one of the parties or a
third party).  My view is we would do it at a price (to compensate us for the
assymetrical risk we would be taking on) - we are currently thinking about
what this price should be.  The contract default is that the Buyer acts as
the ECV Notification Agent.

Method of transmission of confirms (default fax) - Gail please comment.

Compensation Threshold.  If a party fails to perform its obligations relating
to contract notification or nomination then it pays damages to the other
party to keep it whole (ie it pays the cash out charges incurred by the other
party).  The Compensation Threshold allows termination if these damages reach
a certain level in any month.  The default is 'not specified' - ie no
termination.  Legal please comment.

Cross Default Threshold - this defines a minimum payment default level above
which cross-default applies.  Credit Department please advise.

Termination Payment Method.  The contract has two approaches to calcualting
termination payment - the "Loss" method and the "Market" method.
Leagl/Credit - please advise on preference.

Change in Taxes - this clause can be switched on or off - Tax Dept please
advise.

Credit Support - to be discussed with Credit Dept on a case by case basis.

Rollover Clause - the Agreement has a clause in it which automatically
converts existing EFA deals to Grid Trade Master deals when NETA starts.
This clause can be switched off, but presumably we would wish to keep it
switched on.

In agreeing GTMs withg counterparties, we should start with our biggest
counterparties first.  I would suggest:
 Entergy
 Dynegy
 Accord
 National Power/npower
 TXU
 AEP
 Aquila
 British Energy
 Yorkshire
 Scottish & Southern
I understand Richard has nominated Derek to start this process.

Any comments?

Ali


As a reminder, the Summer Associate Program is an integral and critical part
of our recruiting efforts.  You have been asked to act as mentors for Summer
Associates who attend the schools for which you have recruiting
responsibility.  You were invited to meet the Summer Associates at a
reception being held at the Sierra Grill, located at 4704 Montrose, on
Thursday, June 22nd from 6:00 p.m. to 7:30 p.m.

To date several of you have not responded.  Please respond to Cheryl Kuehl
(ext. 3-9804) by Tuesday, June 20th.  If you are unable to attend, please
advise Cheryl that you intend to make other arrangements to meet your Summer
Associate so that she may advise the Associate not to look for you at the
reception.  We thank you for your co-operation and your efforts to assist
will not go unnoticed.

Jeff and Joe


"paulhastings.com" made the following annotations on 04/19/01 22:34:01
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NEW E-MAIL ADDRESSES AT PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP

We have changed our e-mail address.  Our new domain name is
paulhastings.com.  In most cases, our address is composed of
conventional first name and last name plus @paulhastings.com.  Here are
two examples: janesmith@paulhastings.com and danjones@paulhastings.com.
If you have any questions, please contact us at noc@paulhastings.com.

==============================================================================
"The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity
to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you
received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the
material from all computers."

==============================================================================

Attached is a  revised draft of the LLC Agreement which has been marked to
indicate the changes  from the draft distributed on Friday, April 13.? As we
discussed, the most  substantive change made to the LLC Agreement reflects
NorthWestern's desire to  have the LLC treated as a single member limited
liability company for tax  purposes.? While Enron's tax persons have not yet
agreed to this concept,  we have forwarded the attached draft in order to
clarify our request and to  provide Enron's tax persons with the language we
believe is necessary to meet  NorthWestern's objectives with respect to this
matter.???
?
You will note that a  significant number of provisions regarding tax matters
have been deleted.?  Such provisions have been deleted because, to the extent
the LLC is treated as a  single member limited liability company, such
provisions would no longer be  relevant.
?
A revised draft of  the Letter Agreement will be circulated  shortly.
 - LLC Agreement(v4).DOC
 - LLC Agreement(vRED).DOC


Please remember to go into the Performance Management System to select
reviewers for this series of performance reviews.


Caroline:
Has Joe Hunter prepared the AIG confirms?  As I mentioned earlier this week,
once we get the signed confirms and the opinion from AIG we will circulate
the ISDA draft.  I will send the template to Sara, Frank and Paul shortly.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com

	Caroline Abramo@ENRON
	04/25/2001 12:31 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent
Hendry/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Paul Radous/Corp/Enron, Fred Lagrasta/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Valentis and CD Holdings

sure... i think you have everything on valentis and cd holdings.. i am
waiting for those docs and AIG to go out.. i have all the other info on the
funds we have in the system and will just use the template you gave me to
organize it.

Brent- did you find the Catequil confirms ... also, comments on Catequil????

thanks,
Caroline

From: Sara Shackleton@ECT on 04/25/2001 11:04 AM
To: Caroline Abramo/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank
Sayre/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Re: Valentis and CD Holdings

Caroline:

As you know, Carol is working on your template; then Frank, Carol and I  will
have to review/discuss.  You will have the template soon.  We are all working
hard to provide you with the necessary documentation.

Are you preparing the information for us?

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	Caroline Abramo@ENRON
	04/25/2001 10:07 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Valentis and CD Holdings

sara- can i have a blank template over email.. thanks, ca

From: Sara Shackleton@ECT on 04/25/2001 09:03 AM
To: Caroline Abramo/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Fred Lagrasta/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Radous/Enron@EnronXGate

Subject: Re: Valentis and CD Holdings

Caroline:

No Deemed ISDA, we decided that yesterday for the long-dated deal.

We are working on the draft masters for emailing.  Please send me the
information about your counterparties' lawyers so we can begin negotiating.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	Caroline Abramo@ENRON
	04/25/2001 06:42 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank
Sayre/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc: Fred Lagrasta/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Radous/Corp/Enron
		 Subject: Valentis and CD Holdings

Please send the draft ISDAS to:

Marty Lifgren- mlifgr@wexford.com
Charles Davidson- cdavid@wexford.com

We agreed that the fastest way to proceed wwas to send the ISDA or can we
still send the deemed ISDA?.


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/09/2000
01:25 PM ---------------------------

Stinson Gibner
03/09/2000 01:13 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Prof. at Rice

Here is this prof's home page at Rice.  His name is Richard Baraniuk.

http://www-dsp.rice.edu/~richb/

--Stinson


Good idea.  If I may, I propose that it go out on Edison's letterhead.  We
also need to make sure ORA does not quickly give up the ship.

----- Original Message -----
From: <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>
To: <Colin.Cushnie@sce.com>
Cc: <burkee@cts.com>; <craigc@calpine.com>; <Douglas.Porter@sce.com>;
<INGGM@sce.com>; <jdasovic@enron.com>; <MDay@GMSSR.com>;
<Michael.Alexander@sce.com>; <Paul_Amirault%SCE@sce.com>;
<rick.counihan@greenmountain.com>; Tom Beach <tomb@crossborderenergy.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2000 10:26 AM
Subject: Re:

>
> Folks.  Let me throw out a proposal.  I believe that we should immediately
> draft a very brief letter or press release that explains why the PD is
> misguided and will lead to very bad energy policy for the state, and why
> our settlement is the right one and why it's good energy policy for the
> state.  The letter should be signed by everyone who signed the settlement.
> It needs to be released by the end of this week.  Absent this kind of
> action, nothing's going to turn this thing around.  Spending time and
money
> writing "comments" will be a waste of time and money.  We'll need to do a
> lot more, but I think we have to start this way or fold up our tents now.
> Thoughts?
>
> Best,
> Jeff
>
>
>
>                     Colin.Cushnie
>                     @sce.com             To:     "Tom Beach"
<tomb@crossborderenergy.com>
>                                          cc:     burkee@cts.com,
craigc@calpine.com,
>                     11/27/2000           Douglas.Porter@sce.com,
INGGM@sce.com,
>                     08:54 PM             jdasovic@enron.com,
MDay@GMSSR.com,
>                                          Michael.Alexander@sce.com,
>                                          Paul_Amirault%SCE@sce.com,
>                                          rick.counihan@greenmountain.com
>                                          Subject:     Re:
>
>
>
>
>
> I haven't had the opportunity to read the PD yet, but I share your
> frustration with the Commission's inaction in the face of significant and
> fast moving events.  Our settlement and electric restructuring are clearly
> distinguishable.  Arguably, the status quo has, in part, perpetuated the
> record high prices being observed of late.  The Commission should have
> little to fear by proceeding with its initial direction of statewide
> consistency in the intrastate gas industry.
>
>
>
>
>                     "Tom Beach"
>
>                     <tomb@crossbordere        To:     "Mike Day"
> <MDay@GMSSR.com>,
>                     nergy.com>                <Douglas.Porter@sce.com>,
> <jdasovic@enron.com>,
>
> <rick.counihan@greenmountain.com>,
>                     11/27/2000 03:19          <craigc@calpine.com>,
> <burkee@cts.com>,
>                     PM                        <Paul_Amirault%SCE@sce.com>,
>
>                     Please respond to         <Michael.Alexander@sce.com>
>
>                     "Tom Beach"               cc:     <INGGM@sce.com>,
> <Colin.Cushnie@sce.com>
>                                               Subject:     Re:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> If I'm reading pages 38 - 40 of the Bilas PD correctly, the Commission's
> primary concern over the competitive benefits of city-gate pricing is the
> fact that PG&E city-gate prices in October were much higher than border
> prices plus transportation.  October bidweek PG&E city-gate prices were
> high, but only because southern California prices plummeted from the high
> levels that they had reached in late August and September, following the
El
> Paso explosion.  In November, the PG&E city-gate moved back into its
normal
> relationship with Topock and Malin prices.  For the Commission to be
> spooked
> by one month of price fluctuations is crazy.
>
> I'm hopeful that my friends at Edison, in particular, can help the
> Commission to distinguish what we were trying to achieve in the CS on the
> gas side from the mess that is electric restructuring....
>
> Tom Beach
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <Michael.Alexander@sce.com>
> To: <Paul_Amirault%SCE@sce.com>; <tomb@crossborderenergy.com>;
> <burkee@cts.com>; <craigc@calpine.com>; <rick.counihan@greenmountain.com>;
> <jdasovic@enron.com>; <MDay@GMSSR.com>; <Douglas.Porter@sce.com>
> Cc: <Colin.Cushnie@sce.com>; <INGGM@sce.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2000 3:27 PM
>
>
> > The PD in the Gas Restructuring is out.   I have yet to read the whole
> > thing, but the title "Approval With Modifications Of The Interim
> > Settlement..." does not bode well.  According to Steve Watson (and I
only
> > have Steve's statement second hand), the decision reflects a fear that
> the
> > timing is wrong in light of the current volatile gas price market.
> >
> > (See attached file: Proposed.doc)
> >
> > --
> > Michael S. Alexander
> > Southern California Edison
> > 626-302-2029
> > 626-302-3254 (fax)
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


Greg,

Attached for your review and further handling is a red-lined version
indicating our changes for the FPL/HPL Confidentiality Agreement.  Most of
the changes were to make the agreement bilateral.

Thanks,

Eric Gillaspie
713-345-7667
Enron Building 3886

	Greg Brazaitis
	11/08/2000 09:50 AM

		 To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Gillaspie/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Confidentiality Agreement

Gentlemen,
I have received the following from Florida Power and Light on a new IPP.
Please reveiw and then let us construct an agreement that we can return to
them.

Thanks,
Greg
---------------------- Forwarded by Greg Brazaitis/HOU/ECT on 11/08/2000
09:01 AM ---------------------------

Bill_Barrett@fpl.com on 11/06/2000 03:55:52 PM
To: Greg.Brazaitis@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Confidentiality Agreement

Greg,

I have attached a plain vanilla confidentiality agreement that allows us to
discuss in detail our potential site in east Texas. Please have the
appropriate person it and return it to me for our files.I will return a
fully executed copy to you .

Thanks,

Bill

(See attached file: Pipeline Confidentiality Agreement.doc)

 - Pipeline Confidentiality Agreement.doc


Privileged and Confidential
Attorney-Client Communication

Per our conversation, attached is the latest draft of the Interconnection
Agreement.  This draft reflects TECO's comments, Enron's comments, and my
own comments.  At this stage, rather than clean up all drafting issues (and
there are many), it is probably most important to focus on conceptual
matters.

That said, the most significant conceptual revisions from the previous draft
are the addition of the Notice to Proceed concept, the addition of
Conditions Precedent concept, and revamping the Milestone provisions.

As for drafting matters -- the previous draft had many undefined terms,
which I have now defined.  Also, there were many sections with concepts
repeated in other sections but stated differently and with slightly
different obligations.  To avoid confusion and a potential dispute as to the
controlling section, I have deleted repetitive sections.  (For example,
Section 4.14 and 18.5 address disconnection after termination of the
Agreement, but each is worded differently and has somewhat different
provisions.   I have deleted the old Section 4.14.).  Also, I have made some
clarifications to ambiguous language.

There are still several open issues that we should discuss prior to
providing this draft to TECO.    I should be available throughout the day,
so we can discuss the attached.

Andy

 <<8R@301!.DOC>>

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete all copies of the message.


Forwarded from Halliburton:

Subject: Report from WTO - Part IV

INSIDE (AND OUTSIDE) THE WTO

INSIDE

 Renato Ruggiero, former Director General of the World Trade
Organization (WTO) spoke at a dinner for members of the Coalition for
Service Industries on Wednesday evening.  His remarks were some of the best
made during the WTO Seattle Round but were off the record and will probably
not appear in print.  Among his observations were:

* 1.7 billion people residing in 30 countries are trying to get into
the WTO at this time.  The WTO is regarded by many as the organization
needed to deal with the globalization in which all nations now find
themselves.
* Labor and environmental issues already have forums in which to have
their issues heard.  Their problem is that nothing works as well as the WTO.
That they want to move their issues into the WTO area is not only
understandable, it is flattering.
* (Concerning the demonstrations) "As long as reason rules over
emotions in this world, the WTO will prevail.  The demonstrator's goals may
be right.  I don't know.  But, their aim is wrong.  The WTO should not be
their target."
* The demonstrators have had the effect of making ministers even more
determined to finish their work.

The Seattle Round has had an interesting ancillary result.  Environmental
groups previously in disagreement or acting independently, have taken the
occasion of the WTO meeting to unify.  Greenpeace, The Sierra Club, Friends
of the Earth, The National Wildlife Federation, and The World Wildlife Fund
have been meeting before and during the Seattle Round.  Their goal is to put
a sharp focus on what they want from the WTO.  As of this writing, it is not
clear if they wish to put the WTO out of business or get their issues made
part of the negotiations but the latter is more likely.  What ever they
decide, the coalition of these environmentalists will be much more likely to
be heard in the future.

Prior to the President's arrival, agriculture and other difficult issues
were making significant headway towards resolving differences.  The
President arrived in Seattle on Wednesday amongst hopes that his visit would
have a positive effect on negotiations - but the opposite occurred.  His
ability to communicate was put to good use as he spoke to all facets of the
WTO to include the demonstrators and, until he granted an interview with the
Financial Times, the best possible face was being put on WTO negotiations.
The Times article was published on Thursday, however, and it upset everyone.
In the interview, President Clinton stated that core standards on labor
should be adopted by the WTO and included in all trade agreements.  If they
were not followed, they should be enforced with sanctions.  Until these
remarks, the administration had maintained that only a working group on
labor should be established with the mission of analyzing links between
trade and labor.  The idea of a working group was gaining steam until the
interview was published.  The United States Trade Representative was rumored
to be very upset and the President's remarks met with almost universal
condemnation.  Delegates from Japan and the European Union made strong
statements of disagreement as did most of the developing nations.  Many see
the use of sanctions as the antithesis of the WTO's mission.  There was
speculation that the remarks were made to assist Vice President Gore with
labor in his bid for the White House and that the President did not really
believe they would have any effect within the WTO.  They did - and the
effect was all negative.

President Clinton made the rounds of a number of parties that evening to
include one hosted for the members of congress who had worked on the African
Trade bill.  At one time, prior to the President's arrival, there were 30
members of Congress on the stage with Representative Charles Rangel (D-N.Y.)
and it was the broadest possible array of political beliefs.  Individuals
representing the most liberal side of the Democrat party stood side by side
with individuals from the most conservative side of the Republican party,
all waiting for the President.  When he didn't appear, the congressional
representatives left the stage and mingled with about 100 guests.  It was a
lobbyist's dream!  For 45 minutes, they talked, joked and lobbied while they
waited for the President.  He arrived, made a predictable speech and left
the stage only to find that, for security reasons, he would have to remain
in the room awhile longer.  It turned out to be one of the most festive
events of the week.

OUTSIDE

 498 people were arrested as of Thursday morning.  Delegates from
many countries were surprised that the arrests were so long in coming and
expressed significant displeasure with the turmoil in the streets.  Third
world countries have been the most critical.  Their concerns focus on
improving their economies   They need infrastructure and financing before
they can worry about the plight of sea turtles in oceans that don't even
boarder their countries.  Many of them do not disagree with America's basic
goals but they believe that rich countries ideals are standing in the way of
third world countries progress.

 As days of disturbance continue, the humor of the demonstrations is
diminishing.  What is left are hard core anarchists bent simply on
destruction.  The positive side of all this is that the goodness of people
in Seattle is now beginning to show itself.  King Country Councilman Brian
Derdowski took to the streets Tuesday evening, surveying the damage and
trying to mollify the crowds.  He saw a man grab a sack of coffee at a
vandalized Starbucks and he approached him.  Derdowski told the would-be
looter he really shouldn't take the bag of beans and the man dropped the
bag, hugged the Councilman and then walked away from the riots.

 Nancy Woodland and her husband, both Seattle attorneys, saw the
violence on television on Tuesday.  By Wednesday afternoon, they were in the
heart of town with Windex, Comet, SOS and elbow grease.  They spent most of
the day cleaning the storefronts of other peoples businesses.

 Terry Webb who owns a greeting card store, has seen his business
drop by 90%.  When interviewed by a local newspaper, he simply smiled and
reached for one of his cards.  He handed the reporter a card that read,
"Tough times are like speed bumps.  They only slow you down for a little."

 This will be my last report from Seattle.
       Don

DAVE GRIBBIN
Vice President
Office of Government Affairs
Halliburton Company
1150 18th Street, N.W., Suite 200
Washington, D. C. 20036
(202) 223-0820


FYI, Reagan is a man, a developer in Ben Jacoby's group.

I checked the paper for an obit about Don.  Was there one?  How was his
mother?

Are you going to Jillian's on Thursday?

Can't wait to see pics.  I'll be by soon.

Kay

From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 09/18/2000 09:48 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: VEPCO interconnection agreement

20 was all I could find.  I saw where Reagan could get it on 29.  I'll call
her and get a room number and let catering know.  These rooms fill up so
fast!!!!!!

We had to go to Don's "event" yesterday, so that was rather difficult on
Ric.  He's doing pretty good, trying to take it a day at a time.  I worked on
notecards all weekend.  I have your blow up and also need to know if you want
your cards in matte or glossy (I have samples).  The glossy ones are $3
each.  That paper is so expensive that I had to go up on the price.  The blow
up looks great and it's $10.00.

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	09/17/2000 08:58 PM

		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: VEPCO interconnection agreement

Please see if there is any way we can have it in the same elevator bank.  I
will ask to have it on 29, so you won't need to check there.

Hope you've had a great weekend.  The weather was PERFECT!!!!

Kay

From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 09/15/2000 05:16 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: VEPCO interconnection agreement

The meeting will be held at 9am in EB20C2.

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	09/15/2000 04:38 PM

		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: VEPCO interconnection agreement

Please see if you can get a conference room, allowing 2 hours for the meeting.

Thanks,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 09/15/2000 04:38
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kay Mann                           09/15/2000 04:36 PM

To: Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Larry
Soderquist/HOU/ECT@ECT, Reagan Rorschach/NA/Enron@Enron, nwodka@bracepatt.com
cc: Heather Kroll/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ozzie Pagan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ben
Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: VEPCO interconnection agreement

How does everybody look for a discussion concerning the VEPCO interconnection
agreement on Tuesday, Sept 19?

I've checked with Christi, Mitch and Reagan, so they don't need to confirm.

Details to follow...

Thanks,

Kay


Would you please check on the status of this expense report.  The last entry
I had on it was 9/5/01, 13 days ago.  My AMEX bill will be charged interest
if I dont receive a check in the near future.  YOur assistance in this will
be greatly appreciated.

enron_update@concureworkplace.com on 09/05/2001 11:08:25 AM
To: "Lawrence Campbell" <larry.campbell@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: <<Concur Expense Document>> - Larry Campbell

The Approval status has changed on the following report:

Status last changed by:  Automated Administrator
Expense Report Name: Larry Campbell
Report Total: $2,232.28
Amount Due Employee: $2,232.28
Amount Approved: $2,232.28
Amount Paid: $0.00
Approval Status: Pending
Payment Status: Pending

To review this expense report, click on the following link for Concur Expense.
http://expensexms.enron.com


Hi, John:

Glad to hear from you.  How is everything?  I am glad the bank deal will go
through and you will put UBS Energy Trading in your business card.

Thanks for your message.  I will check it out.

Have a nice day!

George Huan

----- Original Message -----
From: "Griffith, John" <John.Griffith@ENRON.com>
To: <georgehuan@hotmail.com>
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 4:18 PM
Subject: FW: What's up

George,

Check these guys out.  They are a consulting firm.  Jeff Young used to
be my boss.  Let me know.

John
>  -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff Young <Jeff.Young@PAConsulting.com>@ENRON
> Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 2:41 PM
> To: Griffith, John
> Subject: RE: What's up
>
> Sure...have them forward resumes and look at our website
> www.paconsulting.com
>
> Jeff
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John.Griffith@enron.com [mailto:John.Griffith@enron.com]
> Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 10:14 AM
> To: Jeff Young
> Subject: What's up
>
>
>
>      There are alot of people getting laid off over here.  Do you guys
> have
> any openings?  Can I send them your way to talk to them?
>
>      I am talking experience from the trade floor down to clerks.
>
>      Thanks for any help that you can give.
>
>      John
>
>
>
>
> **********************************************************************
> This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant
> affiliate and
> may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
> the
> intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
> others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient
> (or
> authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
> reply
> to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
> all
> copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are
> not
> intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or
> evidence a
> binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
> affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not
> be
> relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or
> otherwise.
> Thank you.
> **********************************************************************


Test reply.

EnronOnline@ect.enron.com on 11/23/99 11:39:24 PM
Please respond to EnronOnline@ect.enron.com
To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: New Product Type Approval Request

Legal approval required for new product type: Continental - Belgium zz test
Apples Financial Option ()
Validated by: ACONNELL at 11/24/99 5:39:22 AM


Hope this helps

I am out of town on the 20/21 of April  so not able to make it

Friday or saturday the 27th/28th of April are fine

Saturday the 5th is ok (not the prime choice as Frank's flight gets in from
the offsite at 6pm that night unless he changes it or comes straight to your
house - which I am    willing to make him do)

we are out of the weekend of the 11th and 12th

and ok any other time in May

Beth


Tana,
Just wanted to keep you in the loop.  I would be interested in your thoughts
on the separate passwords.
Regards,
Doug
---------------------- Forwarded by Doug Sewell/HOU/ECT on 03/07/2001 03:51
PM ---------------------------

SHARI STACK
03/07/2001 02:38 PM
To: Doug Sewell/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Terri Clynes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward Sacks/Enron@EnronXGate
Subject: Alliant Agency Relationship

Doug -

As discussed, at the absolute minimum,  we need the following from Alliant in
order to do EOL trades as well as longer dated OTC trades:

1. Written evidence that Steve Castleburg is an authorized signatory for each
of the 3 utilities (and AECS - see below).
2. In addition, I would like for Alliant Energy Corporate Services to sign
the Consent and Acknowledgment letter as well. I am not sure why a signature
space was not provided for them on the document. Anyway - it is on our system
and easy to generate a revised letter with a signature space for AECS.

Also, as discussed, in order for us to give Alliant the best credit line
possible, here is our wish list, from most desirable downwards. What this
means is that if Alliant is willing to do #1- then they will get the best
line possible. If they do #2, then the line will be somewhat decreased, and
so on.

1. Separate EOL applications and passwords for each individual utility who is
appointing Alliant as agent (i.e. a total of 3 individual passwords). Also a
separate Consent and Acknowledgment for each will need to be signed by AECS
and the relevant utility.

2. Alliant identifies at the time of transacting which utility the
transaction is for.

3. Alliant sends us an allocation schedule at the end of each month which
shows which transaction is for which utility.

This is the procedure we follow with all utility agency relationships - we
are not singling out Alliant - I can promise you that.,

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks,

Shari


Tana - Do we have any ISDAs in place with Southern?

CJG


-----Original Message-----
From: 	"Katheryn Stalker" <kstalker@RiskLimited.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, January 01, 2002 5:10 PM
To:	Executive Group
Subject:	Happy New Year!

           We wish you and  your family a happy and prosperous 2002.    Happy  New Year!  [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Risk Ltd

 - clip_image002.jpg
 - clip_image004.gif
 - clip_image003.gif


Darren:

I zeroed the path on deal 284599, and left 4,500 pathed on 339604 at meter
4132, and pathed 5,000 for both deals 341801 & 341808 at meter 67 for 7/24
only.  I also notified Betsy Boring/Southern about the situation and
explained to her that any deal they make on EOL cannot be changed in any way,
however we would move the gas for the 24th only because we ok'd the change
before we realized it was an EOL deal.


PLEASE READ THIS IMPORTANT INFORMATION CONCERNING THE ENRON STOCK FUND IN THE ENRON CORP. SAVINGS AND ESOP PLANS

On Friday, January 11, trading of Enron stock was suspended on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE).  All Savings and ESOP Plan transactions, including 401(k) payroll contributions,  involving this fund were placed in a pending status until trading resumed.

As announced by Enron's Office of the Chair on Wednesday, January 16, Enron stock would now be traded Over The Counter (OTC).  Upon receiving this information, work began immediately to develop a process that allows for OTC trades in the plans.

On Thursday, January 17, Enron initiated a process to facilitate OTC trades of Enron stock inside the 401(k) and ESOP and all pending transactions were processed using Thursday's closing price.

Now that trading has resumed, we urge you to review your investment elections to ensure that they are consistent with your investment goals.

As things change, we will continue to update you.

Enron Benefits Department


[IMAGE] Forums Discuss these points in the Forums:  Forexnews Forum       Technicals Live Charts Analysis available from: Cornelius Luca   J.P. Chorek   Technical Research Ltd.   Charts & News featuring Standard & Poor's       Interest Rates   US: Japan: Eurozone: UK: Switzerland:   1.75%  0.15%  3.25%  4.0%  1.25-2.25%       [IMAGE] 	 [IMAGE]  Japanese Forex Trading Preview  March 7, 7:00 PM: EUR/$..0.8812 $/JPY..127.70 GBP/$..1.4260 $/CHF..1.6697  Japanese Forex Trading Preview by Darko Pavlovic  At 6:50:00 PM Japan Q4 GDP q/q prel. (exp -1%, prev -2.1%) Japan Feb Domestic WPI y/y (exp -1.4%, prev -1.4%) Feb Overall WPI y/y (exp -0.1%, prev -0.6%) Private Consumption (exp 2.5%, prev -6.7%) Feb M2+CD y/y  (exp 3.5%, prev 3.6%) Japan Feb M2+CD m/m (exp 5%, prev 7%)  The yen rose to its highest levels since October 1998 vs. the dollar as the surge in Nikkei boosted demand for the currency. The yen rose more than 3% to 126.40 before falling to the current levels of 127.70. The Japanese currency has gained 5.7% since the end of January. Japan Oct-Dec GDP fell real 1.2% q/q (worse than expectations of a 0.9% contraction) showing economy shrank for the 3rd consecutive quarter. Japan Oct-Dec real GDP down annualized 4.5% Japan Feb M2+CD money supply up 3.7% y/y Dec nominal GDP down 1.2% q/q Oct-Dec private sector consumption up 1.9% q/q Oct-Dec housing investment down 0.2% q/q Oct-Dec private capex down 12% q/q Feb domestic WPI up 0.1% m/m Oct Dec public investment down 2% q/q Japan Oct-Dec GDP deflator down 1.2% y/y Feb domestic WPI down 1.3% y/y Oct-Dec external demand GDP contribution -0.1% domestic -1%. Current account surplus 2.9% of GDP in Oct-Dec Japan says govt 1% FY GDP forecast needs outcome of +1.6% in Jan-March Japan says calendar 2001 GDP down real 0.5% y/y Recent changes in the law concerning the short-selling of stocks, as well as increasing confidence of a US-led global economic recovery spurred the re-allocation of assets from the US to Japan and other markets. In addition, rumors that the Bank of Japan was in the market also fueled the currency's rise, in spite of warnings from the MoF's Kuroda and Muto that Japan would be monitoring for speculative and excessive moves. There is a possibility that MoF could warn of possible intervention if the yen continues to strengthen. Foreigners bought a net 114-bln yen in Japanese shares last week, the biggest amount in seven weeks. The currency also strengthened due to repatriation talks ahead of March 31, the end of fiscal year in Japan. For the past five weeks, Japanese investors have been net sellers of foreign securities. Japan's January index of leading economic indicators in January stood at 75.0, above the 50 mark, assuming the economy may hit bottom and improve in coming months. The lagging indicator for January came in at 16.7, while the coincident indicator was 33.3.Rating agency Fitch IBCA said Japan's near-term sovereign risks are small for government bonds and other debt securities issued or guaranteed by the government. The firm currently rates Japanese long-term bonds double A. But Fitch remains bearish, saying Japan's massive fiscal deficit remains on an "unsustainable medium-term path." PM Koizumi promised on Thursday to take all required steps to revive Japan's sagging economy, but added there are no ''quick fixes.'' ''There is no change in my policy that the economy will not recover without reform and to promote structural reforms,'' Koizumi said. Resistance seen at 128 and 128.50. Support at 127 and at the 200-day moving average of 125.0.  EUR/USD is trading around 88.10 after reaching a 1-1/2 month high of 88.39 cents, shrugging off the European Central Bank's decision this morning to keep rates steady at 3.25%. Markets had anticipated the central bank would take no action due to growing signs of Eurozone economic recovery and rising inflationary pressures. ECB President Duisenberg repeated that he expects inflation to fall below 2% "in the course of the coming months", helped by falling producer prices that will be reflected in CPI, and by moderation in M3 components. Nonetheless, he warned that for inflation to stay below its limit would depend on wage moderation, which is crucial to growth in jobs and stable prices. EUR/USD faces resistance at its 200-day moving average of 88.50. Next upward target is seen at 89.0 and 89.40. Support is viewed at 87.40, backed by 87.0 and 86.65.  The pound gained a cent to peak at a 1-1/2 week high of 1.4313 against the dollar, after dropping to a 2-session low of 1.4184 cents in reaction to the Bank of England's expected decision to keep rates unchanged at 4.0% this morning. On its part, the IMF recommended the Bank of England should be ready to adjust monetary policy in either direction, noting the need to monitor escalating home prices and consumer debt. The IMF forecasted UK growth in 2002 at 1.8%, noting the slowdown would be brief but subject to risks. Next key upward target is seen at the 200-day moving average of 1.4333, followed by 1.4370 and 1.440. Support holds at 1.420, 1.4170 and 1.4130.  In his testimony to the House of Representative, Greenspan altered his speech slightly as he stated that the US economic expansion is "well underway  and that an array of influences unique to the current cycle are likely to moderate their pace. He indicated encouraging signs that demand trends are strengthening but the size of the pickup is uncertain, especially since business investment elsewhere, including aircraft, will most likely remain weak. Thus he commented that a US recovery almost certainly would not match the average growth of past recessions, which have typically averaged around 7%.  Tomorrow's release of the key US employment labor report is expected to show the creation of 5K to 10K in non-farm payrolls, though some private forecasts expect the creation of 100K. The unemployment rate is expected to rise to 5.8% from 5.6%, while average hourly earnings are seen up 0.3% from 0.0%.Key Eurozone indicators include Italian GDP and Dutch CPI. Highlights from Japan comprise GDP, money supply and wholesale prices.    	[IMAGE] Audio Mkt. Analysis Yen Soars 3.5% vs USD       Articles & Ideas  Yen's March Madness   Will Dollar be Fuelled against the Euro?       Articles & Ideas Forex Glossary   Economic Indicators   Forex Guides   Link Library      [IMAGE]
		[IMAGE][IMAGE] [IMAGE][IMAGE]
		  This e-mail is never sent unsolicited. If you wish to unsubscribe from this or any other Forexnews.com newsletters, please click here .   Any opinions expressed by representatives of Forexnews.com or its affiliates as to the commentary, market information, and future direction of prices of specific currencies reflect the views of the individual analyst, and do not necessarily represent the views of Forexnews.com or its affiliates in any way. In no event shall Forexnews.com or its affiliates have any liability for any losses incurred in connection with any decision made, action or inaction taken by any party in reliance upon the information provided in this material; or in any delays, inaccuracies, errors in, or omissions of information.


Attached are three documents for your consideration:

--Q and As if there is a leak about the possible sale, but we don't want to
admit it (qanoadmit)

--News release if the leak runs amok and it is determined that we must
divulge--either for shareholder reasons or severe reputation
problems/miconceptions.  (leaknr)

--Q and As to accompany news release.  I suppose another option is having a
statement and Q and As ready without a release, but I don't think this gives
us the control we would need.  (qaadmit)

Please review and comment by end of next week.  Thanks.


Based on the recent changes in Global Markets, specifically Global Products
and Coal, the follow organizational changes have been implemented.

Michelle Bruce will assume the Global Products business lead role.  She will
be responsible for ensuring that the business processes and procedures are as
effective and efficient as possible.  She will also be working with other
groups and offices to ensure consistency of both performance measures and
business standards.  John Swinney, lead of Risk Management, and Lisa Walker,
lead of Logistics Coordination, will report directly to Michelle.

Michelle Thomason will continue in her current strategic planning role.  In
addition, she will assume the business lead role supporting new endeavors
that our will group will become involved in, including the cost of funds and
prepays activity.  Michelle will report to Michelle Bruce.

We are pleased to announce that Jeff Sorenson has joined the Global Products
management team .  He will be responsible for physical confirmations as well
as coordinating the financial confirmations and financial settlements for
Global Markets.  Lynn Shivers, Documentation lead and his group, will report
to Jeff.

Mark Leskowitz will continue to manage the trade accounting group for both
Global Products and coal as well as all physical settlements for both
business lines.  Julie Sengele will help with the physical settlements and
the coal trade accounting.  Julie will report directly to Mark.

Michelle Bruce, Jeff Sorsenson and Mark Leskowitz will report directly to me.

Simon Thurbin has joined us from the London office on a temporary assignment
working with Michelle Bruce to define consistent business processes,
practices and procedures.   As a result of this global effort, we will work
to ensure consistency and continuity between the Houston and London offices.

Joel Bennett has joined us from the London office.  He will be working on
changing the Global risk book process, which is being transitioned to Houston.

Shelly Stubbs will be going to London on a temporary assignment to work with
Cindy Horn focusing on processes on procedures, specifically controls.

Please join me in supporting all of these people in their new roles and
additional responsibilities.

Regards,

Scott


>From: Vusta@aol.com
>To: hoangbq@yahoo.com, tang595752@aol.com, rorordh1@yahoo.com,
>chi325@hotmail.com, DanielAlbert@dotplanet.com, ChinaD0LLs@aol.com,
>Kelvin.H.Vu@mail.sprint.com, Joanna.Le@mail.sprint.com,
>nguyen_lani/student@mgccc.cc.ms.us, tlnguyen00@hotmail.com,
>Tien487@cs.com, Kristtiine@aol.com, tvu@bellsouth.net,
>jakobjanzen@hotmail.com, t.vu@haltermarine.com, donnguyen1@hotmail.com,
>    Smileyvu@aol.com, kimv@palacios.k12.tx.us, tpoint@ykc.com
>Subject: funny
>Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2000 09:00:22 EST
>
>click on the website
>
>< <Bush - Gore Dance @
>TVdance.com

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.


great

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nowlan Jr., John L.
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 9:25 AM
To:	Shankman, Jeffrey A.
Subject:	RE:

getting launched this friday

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shankman, Jeffrey A.
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 9:23 AM
To:	Nowlan Jr., John L.
Subject:

what about a 24/7 brent product?


Jill could you try 7/5 to 7/7 or 7/12 to 7/14 for Mike and my trip to Calgary.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Chatterton, Jill
Sent:	Thursday, June 14, 2001 9:43 AM
To:	Swerzbin, Mike; Driscoll, Michael M.
Subject:	Calgary

Hey,
No problem on the tickets, I just need to know when you would like to change them for and they will charge us about a $100 a ticket.   So if you can let me know by tomorrow and I will get it taken care of.

Thanks, Jill


Exits/entries to Texas intrastate:

1. Sale of Valero Pipeline by PG&E to El Paso
2. Phillips sale of GPM to Duke Field Services
3. Shell's contribution of Tejas pipeline to Intergen

Other non-entry/non-exit

1. Sale of assets by El Paso to satisfy conditions to Coastal and Valero
acquisitions.
2. El Paso sale of  Galveston Island Offshore System
2. Sale/attempted sale of assets by Kinder Morgan:
 a) West Texas Assets,
 b) KN Marketing L.P.,
 c) Panhandle Gathering & Processing Assets
 d) MidCon pipeline

From: Barbara N Gray on 03/23/2001 09:44 PM
To: Brian Redmond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward D Gottlob/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim
Schwieger/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ann Ballard/enron@enronxgate
cc: nimus@velaw.com
Subject: SPECIFICATION TO 27 OF DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE SECOND REQUEST

Please provide me with the name, address,type of entity, and phone number of
each entity that you know of who entered or exited from the Texas natural gas
intrastate pipeline market or natural gas storage facility  from 1999 to
present.Also please forward this memo to any HPL or Enron employee who would
know this information without having to do research the issue outside of
Enron.

Thanks
bng


If John Malowney is okay with the confirmation he reviewed, I'm fine.  I made
the changes he suggested and sent it out, so if nothing else needs to be done
for the confirmation, then yes, please add some notes in the comment section
of deal entry about what happened.

Thanks!

   Kate Symes                05/01/2001 06:07 PM

To: Sharen Cason/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Montana power

I'm really sorry about the confusion - I actually just got filled in myself.
I entered these deals for Mike Swerzbin yesterday, but he gave me an
incorrect delivery point (mid-columbia instead of montana system border).
Then Cara Semperger, in Scheduling, went in to change the delivery point and
felt that the deal should be combined into one with three legs instead of
three separate deals.

So, in the end, she killed 597244 and 597245, and added two legs to 597246.
I'm not sure she talked to John Malowney about any of this, otherwise he
probably would have told her that he already approved the confirm letter.

Please let me know if you'd like comments added to this deal, and I'll do it
right away.

Thanks for your help on this,
Kate

	From:  Sharen Cason                           05/01/2001 03:30 PM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Montana power

Help, I'm confused!  Yesterday I prepared a confirmation for three Montana
Power deals, # 5467244, 597245, 597246.  I sent it to John Malowney and he
approved it and I faxed it out. Today I noticed two of the deals have been
killed and two legs added to the other deal.  I think it is the same deal,
but can someone put notes into the deals saying what they did and why?

Thanks!


Company: 002909     Arng: 63115-00067     Eff Date: 2001-10-26

                        ----- Receipt -----   ----- Delivery -----
                           Quantity  Cut CD      Quantity  Cut CD

Nominated                     2,957                 2,871
Working                       2,957                 2,871
Capacity Allocation               0                     0  CCD
Confirmed                         0                     0


CALENDAR ENTRY:	REMINDER

Description:
	John in Portland

Date:		5/8/2001
Time:		8:00 AM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Stacey W White

Detailed Description:


DTI have reached a 637 settlement with it's customers, they have filed with FERC for approval, the first pipeline to reach a settlement. The settlement includes the netting and trading of imbalances, intraday recalls on released capacity, and other GISB mandates that took years to implement but in reality have no application to the industry.
Liquidity has increased on the system, TTT volumes have increased from 3 Bcf/d to 5 Bcf/d over the last year with a 5:1 ration of physical to traded volumes.
The interconnect with Empire @ Lysander currently flowing 30-60,000dt/d has a maximum capability of 100,000dt/d.  Empire is now allowing secondary deliveries to Lysander therefore volumes have increased at the location.  Note:  Empire recently bought out by Union from ANR.
DTI have an new pipeline project called Green brier.  A new company will be started that will consist of DTI as part owners and operators and other equity interests.  The new pipeline will flow 600,000 dt/d from Cornwell (interconnect with Tennessee and DTI) and run down through VA, into Granville County, NC.
DTI are offering winter only (30cents) and summer only (13cents) service, the project is designed to compete with Transco's Momentum expansion into Zn4.
DTI have remarketed all the 55 Bcf of GSS that was turned back over the past year and also reconstructed for 90% of the 2.2 Bcf/d of transport.
Another project they are looking to release to the market is an expansion of deliveries to Leidy in conjunction with Marketlink.
DTI have a current transportation offering, Lebanon to Leidy capacity 29,100dt/d, for one year starting 11/1/01.  DTI are looking and will probably get max rates (approximately 30 cents).
DTI will be increasing the transportation fuel rates from 2.28% to 2.78% as per a TCRA settlement recently agreed to by it's customers.  The net effect of this will be a small reduction in the delivered quantity at the delivery locations and a small amount of stranded receipt point capacity on peak days.  This news has not been released to the market, I'm not sure when this will take effect.


-----Original Message-----
From: Landmark Chevrolet Parts [mailto:parts@landmarkchevrolet.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 2:32 PM
To: Parks, Joe
Subject: FW: Re: Engine Prices

-----Original Message-----
From: Landmark Chevrolet Parts [mailto:parts@landmarkchevrolet.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 5:52 PM
To: jparks@houston
Subject: Re: Engine Prices

Diesel Engine  $ 6275.00

454 Engine  $ 3350.00

These are your cost.

Rick Darnell


Attached is a comparision to show the latest changes to the agreement.  The
changes include the spec and data sheets.


please print all of this.
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 01/19/2001
08:50 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Amanda Huble @ ENRON                           01/19/2001 07:57 AM

To: Fletcher J Sturm/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, Richard
Tomaski/Corp/Enron@Enron, Laura Luce/Corp/Enron@Enron, Julie A
Gomez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank W Vickers/NA/Enron@Enron, Jonathan
McKay/CAL/ECT@ECT, Tim Heizenrader/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A
Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Fundamental Newsletters


EFF_DT PORTFOLIO_ID DOWN95
12/4/00  MANAGEMENT-CRD 0
12/4/00  MANAGEMENT-GAS 2,989,591
12/4/00  MANAGEMENT-PWR 336,966
12/4/00  AGG-MANAGEMENT 3,189,446


One of your friends sent this email through our website.
Friend's name: Coco Betancourt
Friend's IP address: 12.25.215.2
Date and Time: 12/12/00 10:48:53 AM EST
See the bottom of this message to report abuse.

Hi,

Coco Betancourt would like you to see this Web page:

http://www.daily-blessings.com/105p.htm

check this out  :)

================================================
Coco Betancourt also included this note:

Wishing you all a very wonderful day!
================================================

Win a Billion Dollars!
Win a Billion Dollars!
Win a Billion Dollars!
Win a Billion Dollars!

go to:
http://mailbits.net/grab/taf.asp
Win a Billion Dollars !!!

____
***IMPORTANT NOTE***

This is a free service provided by MailBits.com.
Compared to regular email, this is a better way to
recommend a website to your friends. That's because
information about the sender of the message is included
to prevent and catch abuse of the system.

To report abuse of this service: abuse-taf@mailbits.com


Martin,

I don't  see any problem. The article supportsEnron's position.

Please, go ahead.

Vince
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/09/2001 02:02 PM ---------------------------

Vince J Kaminski
04/05/2001 01:01 PM
To:	Martin Lin/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:	Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject:	Re: publication submission question

Martin,

Let me read it Friday. We run our papers by our PR
department to review for any potential conflict with the company line.
I shall fwd it to them.

I think you should submit it as an Enron employee with a note
that it was developed when you were at UT.

Vince

From:	Martin Lin on 04/02/2001 11:59 AM
To:	Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:	publication submission question

My supervising professors from UT and I are finishing a paper (finally!) that is based on work done for my PhD.  All of the research was done while I was a grad student.  I have a couple of questions regarding submission of this paper (to IEEE Transactions on Power Systems).

1.  Should I submit it with my affiliation as The University of Texas at Austin or as Enron (ENA, Corp, etc)?

2.  What legal or other reviews/clearances would I need?

A draft of the paper for your review is attached.

Thanks,
Martin

<Embedded StdOleLink>


Vince:   Here is an electronic version of Amy Ward's resume.

--Stinson

---------------------- Forwarded by Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT on 02/18/2000
01:58 PM ---------------------------

Amy Ruth Ward <award@Stanford.EDU> on 02/18/2000 12:02:22 PM
To: Stinson Gibner <Stinson.Gibner@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Re: Thanks for coming to Houston

Stinson,

I am pleased to hear your HR department is putting together an offer for
summer employment.  I enjoyed everyone I interviewed with while in Houston
and appreciated you taking the time to put together this day.

As requested, I am attaching an electronic version of my resume.  (Note it
is a slightly more updated one then the one I gave you earlier.)  It is in
Microsoft Word format.

My dates of availability are Wed., July 5 through Fri., September 15 (10
1/2 weeks).

Sincerely,
Amy Ward

 - resume.doc


Little correction going forward

The higher of
St 65 Offer plus $.27
TCO Offer plus $.19

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 05/02/2001 12:56
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Chris Germany                           05/02/2001 10:53 AM

To: Scott Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Judy Townsend/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve
Gillespie/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John Hodge/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Jim Homco/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: OGY using VNG capacity

Currently, we are unable to use IT to serve Ogy at Doyle on Transco.  I have
devised a super scientific method for pricing VNG space for Ogy.  Poke all
the holes in it you want.

Use the following formulas to determine the price to Ogy

The higher of
St 65 Offer plus $.35
TCO Offer plus $.14

Good Luck


Attached is PIRA's latest "Electricity Daily Demand Forecast."

If you have any questions regarding the report's content, please contact
Morris Greenberg (email: morris@pira.com) or Victoria Watkins (email:
vwatkins@pira.com), at (212) 686-6808.

Contact John Graziano regarding PIRA report distribution and address changes
at (212) 686-6808, email: support@pira.com.

NOTE: Circulation of the "Electricity Daily Demand Forecast" outside a
Client's licensed distribution area is strictly prohibited. Clients that are
unsure of their licensed distribution or require an extension of their
current license should contact their PIRA sales representative, or email to
sales@pira.com.

PIRA Energy Group

 - ed051001.pdf
 - ed051001.xls


Nancy,

I don't have details on the meeting on the 20th, but please hold the date
open for us.

Talk to you soon,

Kay

"Nancy Wodka" <nwodka@bracepatt.com> on 07/12/2000 05:19:07 PM
To: <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Re: VEPCO

Kay--got it on my list.  We have various forms of interconnection agreements
to start with and I will also see if VEPCO has one on file at FERC. What's
happening about the meeting on the 20th--will it take place and if so,
include lawyers?  Many thanks.

>>> <Kay.Mann@enron.com> 07/12/00 05:43PM >>>
Nancy,

As difficult as this is to believe, we have been told that VEPCO wants
Enron to take the first crack at the interconnection agreement.  Please put
this on your list.  I will check around here to see if there is a form we
want to use as a starting point.

Thanks,

Kay


"Wood" is spelled with two "o"'s not.................ahh, memories.

----- Original Message -----
From: Erik Wollam
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 3:43 PM
To: Joe.Parks@ENRON.com; knipe3@msn.com
Subject: RE: trailer

Joe, you are correct. I noticed that this morning when spell checking a
letter, but i can't seem to train my fingers.
Chad, I have insert and ball for draw tight unit at your ready.
Storage? simple..stillforest. Put it back by the old weed shed and she'll
never know, when she finds it she'll think it was always there.

>From: "Parks, Joe" <Joe.Parks@ENRON.com>
>To: "chad knipe" <knipe3@msn.com>, "EriK Wollam" <erwollam@hotmail.com>
>Subject: RE: trailer
>Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2002 16:18:10 -0600
>
>i am waiting on pic
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: chad knipe [mailto:knipe3@msn.com]
>Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 3:26 PM
>To: Parks, Joe; EriK Wollam
>Subject: Re: trailer
>
>
>Ahh hah,  I may be able to run up there and view this thing-----any idea on
>a starting price???
>Joe, you have proved your proficiency with scanning in pics of late,  how
>'bout sending over that trailer pic.
>E, do you have a receiver ball for a draw-tite? ...just in case.  Does
>anyone have spare room in their attic to store this trailer??
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Parks, Joe
>Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 3:22 PM
>To: Erik Wollam; knipe3@msn.com
>Subject: RE: trailer
>
>Erik you need to learn how to spell tomorrow. There is no "a". I too am
>challenge when it comes to spelling. We can overcome these challenges one
>word at a time.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Erik Wollam [mailto:erwollam@hotmail.com]
>Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 4:10 PM
>To: knipe3@msn.com; Parks, Joe
>Subject: Re: trailer
>
>
>chad, joe has more info on this. But, as i understand it, Kim had info
>regarding police siezed goods which happen to include this here trailer,
>which has been described as 6x10 and in pretty good condition. apparently
>someone is going to have access to a picture of it sometime today.
>
>then there will be this auction thing tomarrow described below. Perhaps it
>is an opportunity to get us a fire sale deal on a trailer for our cart. e.
>
>
> >From: "chad knipe" <knipe3@msn.com>
> >To: "EriK Wollam" <erwollam@hotmail.com>, "Joe Parks"
><joe.parks@enron.com>
> >Subject: Re: trailer
> >Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2002 15:12:05 -0600
> >
> >What the hell are you talking about???????  Is there some sort of auction
> >going on I don't know about?????????
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: Erik Wollam
> >Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 10:35 AM
> >To: Joe.Parks@ENRON.com; knipe3@msn.com
> >Subject: trailer
> >
> >how in the hell are we supposed to take advantage of this? Chad, you got
> >something going on tomarrow in Humble? Joe? I have depos in my office. No
> >can do.
> >
> >
> > >From: "Parks, Joe" <Joe.Parks@ENRON.com>
> > >To: "Erik Wollam" <erwollam@hotmail.com>
> > >Subject: RE: FW:
> > >Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2002 10:13:54 -0600
> > >
> > >actually its tomorrow, Mar 5, 310 Fisher Rd. Humble Texas ( key map
>335y)
> > >Time previews begin at 9am, sales begin 10am, all sales must be made in
> > >cash
> > >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: Erik Wollam [mailto:erwollam@hotmail.com]
> > >Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 10:06 AM
> > >To: Parks, Joe
> > >Subject: Re: FW:
> > >
> > >
> > >excellent. when and were do we bid?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > >From: "Parks, Joe" <Joe.Parks@ENRON.com>
> > > >To: "Brian Constantine (E-mail)" <brianc@saltgrass.com>,   "Chad
>Knipe
> > > >(E-mail 2)" <knipe3@msn.com>,   "Erik Wollam (E-mail)"
> > > ><erwollam@hotmail.com>
> > > >Subject: FW:
> > > >Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2002 09:37:03 -0600
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >-----Original Message-----
> > > >From: Parks, Kim [mailto:PARKS_KIM@da.co.harris.tx.us]
> > > >Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 9:26 AM
> > > >To: Parks, Joe
> > > >Subject:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >The trailer is in pretty good condition per the officer and he thinks
> >the
> > > >tires were okay.  It is 6' x 10'.  Linda is still going to take a
> >picture
> > > >of
> > > >it today at noon and I will bring it home tonight.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >**********************************************************************
> > > >This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant
> >affiliate
> > > >and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use
> >of
> > > >the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or
>disclosure
> > >by
> > > >others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient
> >(or
> > > >authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender
>or
> > > >reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and
> > >delete
> > > >all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto)
>are
> > >not
> > > >intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or
> >evidence
> > >a
> > > >binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
> > > >affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may
>not
> >be
> > > >relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or
> >otherwise.
> > > >Thank you.
> > >
> >**********************************************************************
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >_________________________________________________________________
> > >Join the world's largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
> > >http://www.hotmail.com
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >_________________________________________________________________
> >Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com
>
>
>
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Join the world's largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
>http://www.hotmail.com
>
>
>

_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com


not a thing yet


Attached for your further handling are Annex B, B-1, B-2 and B-3 for e prime Energy Marketing, Inc., deal no. YL0308.1/3/4.  Please call me if you have any questions.

Stephanie Panus
Enron Wholesale Services
ph:  713.345.3249
fax:  713.646.3490


Tuesday the 15th is fine.  I will get a conference room and lunch set up.  We
can start at 11:30.  I will send out an e-mail invitation to everyone in your
group, my group and the risk group.  If you want to add anything or if you
have something specific you want me to cover, just let me know.

Daren


Louise,

I received the attached questions from Gas Daily regarding our disaster
preparedness.

Jeff Shankman asked me to forward them to you.  I would also be interested to
know what disaster plans have been made for EOL .

Thanks

Pete Keavey
---------------------- Forwarded by Peter F Keavey/HOU/ECT on 05/10/2000
12:03 PM ---------------------------

"Behrman, David" <DBehrman@ftenergy.com> on 05/10/2000 09:36:28 AM
To: "'peter.f.keavey@enron.com'" <peter.f.keavey@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Questions about emergency plans

Attached are some questions whose answers would be useful to us in working
on our plan. Thanks, Pete.

 <<sourcequestions.doc>>

 - sourcequestions.doc


[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]	    [IMAGE]    Quote & 3-Point ViewProfile & FundamentalsKey RatiosAnalyst InfoEarnings EstimatesInsider TradingInteractive Graph ToolGraphs In BulkDiscussionRecommendationsNews Articles   [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] 	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	 Recommend  	 	[IMAGE]

	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]	   kensey's RecommendList  	   Reply  	   Unsubscribe  	[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]	DO NOT reply  to this email. Replies should be made via the underlined "Reply" link above.	[IMAGE]

	'kensey' has removed RDY (Doink) at Oct 23 2001  7:47AM
	DR. Reddy'S Labs Ads (NYSE:RDY)   Symbol  Last  Time  Change  High  Low  Volume  RDY   21.50   4:09PM  0.00  21.62  20.70  0  Community Take   7 Long / 2 Short

	[IMAGE]
	 'kensey' said:
	 Tue Oct 23 07:44:55 2001   support forming apparently near 19.  or, re-enter short below 19 or at or near stochastic overbought.   recommended RDY Short on Sep 5 2001 when it was trading at 23 51/64. Since then it's gone down 9.66% to 21 1/2.   kensey
	 Click here  to  see the full recommendation with annotated graph

	[IMAGE]
	  [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]     kensey's RecommendList       Reply      Unsubscribe   [IMAGE]
[IMAGE]	 ClearStation is not an investment advisory service,  nor a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer and  does not purport to tell or suggest which securities  members should buy or sell for themselves. Members should  always check with their licensed financial advisor  and their tax advisor to determine the suitability of  any investment.  ClearStation, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of  E*TRADE Group, Inc. and an affiliate of E*TRADE  Securities, Inc. and E*TRADE Bank. E*TRADE Securities,  Inc. and E*TRADE Bank are wholly-owned subsidiaries of  E*TRADE Group, Inc. E*TRADE Bank deposits are insured up  to $100,000 by the FDIC. E*TRADE Bank and E*TRADE  Securities, Inc. are separate but affiliated companies.  E*TRADE brokerage accounts are maintained by E*TRADE  Securities, Inc. Products offered by E*TRADE Securities,  Inc. are not insured by the FDIC, are not deposits or  obligations of E*TRADE Bank, are subject to investment  risk, including possible loss of principal invested. ClearStation is a registered trademark of ClearStation, Inc.  E*TRADE is a registered trademark of E*TRADE Securities,  Inc. Member NASD/SIPC.  Copyright (c) 2000.  ClearStation , Inc. All rights reserved.

																	 Question?  Get it answered!   Comments? Talk to us!  Copyright  ? 1998-2000 ClearStation, Inc. All rights reserved. Trademark  Notice  Quotes delayed at least 15 minutes for Nasdaq, 20 minutes otherwise.  ClearStation, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of E*TRADE Group, Inc.
[IMAGE]	  About Us     	I	 Help     	I	 Feedback     	I	 Member  Agreement     	I	 Privacy  Statement    	I	 Advertise     	I	 Jobs     	I	Join      	I	FAQ


Sheri

Provided there is no other documentation which the counterparties have agreed
to which sets out the form of the Confirmation, it may be easier to change
the definition of Confirmation Letter, simply to state that a letter will be
sent confirming the Transaction, leaving us the flexibility to decide what
the form and substance of that document should be from time to time.

Marcus

	Sheri Thomas/ENRON@enronXgate
	05/01/2001 02:29 PM

		 To: Marcus Nettelton/NA/Enron@ENRON, Melissa Ann Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Kim S Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jennifer deBoisblanc Denny/ENRON@enronXgate
		 Subject: RE: EOL GTC Confirms

I have checked the site today, and we do not show Exhibit A on the website
(if it is there, I sure can not find it....).  Do you all (Legal) think that
we should going forward since we are going to eliminate sending the GTCs with
our confirms?

Thanks
Sheri

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Nettelton, Marcus
Sent: Tuesday, May  1, 2001 8:44 AM
To: Murphy, Melissa Ann
Cc: Thomas, Sheri; Theriot, Kim; Jones, Tana; Taylor, Mark; Hodge, Jeffrey;
Sager, Elizabeth
Subject: Re: EOL GTC Confirms

Melissa

Attached is the suggested template for physical power confirmations as
discussed.

 As you know the "Confirmation Letter" is defined in the GTCs as being in the
form attached as Exhibit A to the GTCs, any changes to the confirmation that
the counterparties can expect to receive should also be reflected on the
Website in Exhibit A.

Kind regards,

Marcus

 << File: EOL GTC Template.doc >>

	Melissa Ann Murphy@ECT 04/30/2001 04:51 PM 	   To: Marcus
Nettelton/NA/Enron@ENRON  cc:   Subject: EOL GTC Confirms

Hello, I wanted to make sure I understand where the new language is to be
inserted in our EOL GTC confirmation letter.  Bob Bowen was telling me they
are putting the new paragraph at the beginning of the confirm letter.  The
only problem I see is that we have the trade date and the energy type (firm
energy, etc.) in the first paragraph as well.  We also already have language
in the last paragraph about returning the confirm to us within 2 days.

Please look at the following template and let me know where you would prefer
to see the language added.  We are planning on changing our templates
tomorrow morning.

 << File: EOL GTC Template.doc >>

Thanks,
Melissa
3-1886


The Payment status has changed on the following report:

Status last changed by: Mark D. Davis Jr
Expense Report Name: Las Vegas Outing
Report Total: $854.79
Amount Due Employee: $854.79
Amount Approved: $854.79
Amount Paid: $0.00
Approval Status: Approved
Payment Status: In Progress

To review this expense report, click on the following link for Concur Expense.
http://expensexms.enron.com


---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 11/13/2000 03:27 PM
---------------------------

"Larry W. Bass" <lwbthemarine@bigplanet.com> on 11/13/2000 03:09:04 PM
To: KATHY BASS <daphneco64@bigplanet.com>, kb <daphneco64@yahoo.com>, jason
<jason.bass2@compaq.com>, eric preston bass <Eric.Bass@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Fw: The Latest Official Florida Presential Ballot

?
----- Original Message -----
From: Larry Knigge
 - BallotWPBF11.11.00.doc


Here are the facts to be converted into Talking Points / Facts Sheet for CA
TEAM.

Thanks,

Jim

----- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 02/27/2001 02:14 PM -----

	Mary Schoen
	02/22/2001 02:55 PM

		 To: Neil Bresnan/HOU/EES@EES, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jubran
Whalan/HOU/EES@EES, Kristin Walsh/HOU/ECT@ECT, Clayton Seigle/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jeffrey Keeler/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Janel
Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: CA Supply Realities

Attached is a memo comparing the CEC's forecasted supply and a more realistic
look at what additional resources might be available this summer.

The bottom line is that:

1.  The CEC significantly underestimates the outages that may occur this
summer.  They estimate in their 5,000 MW supply deficit for the summer that
expected outages will be around 3,000MW.  However, November and December saw
significantly higher outage levels.  (7,265 MWs) The FERC has investigated
these outages and found no improprieties- just that the plants are overtaxed
from running at higher than normal capacities.

2.  There are a lot of uncertainties surrounding the 1,244 MWs of projected
supply from rerating/restarting existing thermal and renewable projects.  It
is very unclear how much of this will be able to come on line by this summer,
if at all.  As evidenced by the e-mail I sent out this morning, local
communities may be very opposed to restarting shut down units.  In addition,
these units are likely to be uneconomical.

3.  In the existing resource pool, there are roughly 1,430 MWs of peaking or
other generation units that are running up against their operating hour
limitations from air quality regulations.  The Governor has ordered the local
air quality districts to address these restrictions,  We are beginning to
seem some movement; however, the US EPA has yet to weigh in on these relaxed
standards.

4.  The distributed generation/back-up generation capacity to make up some of
the shortfall is still an unknown.  While there has been some relaxing of the
limitations on run hours for back-up generation at "essential public
services" the increase in DG is expected from "clean" sources, not diesel
emergency generators.

5.  The CEC is doing everything it can to get 50+ MW peaking units on-line by
this summer.  They are promising a 21-day permit application approval process
and are offering to pay half of the cost of offsets, for "clean" sources of
generation in critical areas.

Please let me know if you have any questions or need additional information.

CEC's Summer Forecasted Peak Demand - Resource Balance:

List of Peakers running into their operating hour limitations:

Also available in hard copy format only:
(please e-mail me your fax number if you'd like a copy)

Table 1:  Fully Executed CA ISO Summer Reliability Agreements (the ISO
Peaking Facilities)
Table 2:  Summer 2001 Supply Options - Renewables Construction Status Summary
Table 3:  Summer 2001 Supply Options - Rerate of Non-CEC Projects
Table 4:  Summer 2001 Supply Options - CEC Rerate Status Summary
Table 5:  Idle Biomass Plants Potentially Capable of Restart
Mary Schoen
Environmental Strategies
Enron Corp
713-345-7422


Kali Pereira was not able to make the lesson on Sunday the 21st due to car
trouble.  By my calculations, she has taken 3 private lessons since and
including Dec 31, leaving an $89 balance of the $170.  That would allow for 3
additional private lessons.  What days and times will work over the next few
weeks?  Saturdays and Sundays will work depending on the time.  After school
during the week might work, with the exception of Mondays.

Thanks,

Susan Pereira


Yes 11:00 am CST will work for us.

Thanks,
Gaylen and Jodi

We will call your tele #  from a conference room if that will work for you.


I see Jennifer Bagwell in the system, but not Christopher Walker.

DG    3-9573
---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 11/08/2000
09:41 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Hector McLoughlin @ ENRON                           11/07/2000 09:31 AM

To: Susan Wimberley/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Francisco
deJesus/NA/Enron@ENRON, Janet De La Paz/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeffrey C
Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Please change the supervisors for Analysts and Associates

Susan,
Since the following Associates and Analysts are outside of ENA in Corporate,
I can't change their supervisor information.   Could you please change the
following records to reflect the supervisors named below?

Rahmaan Mwongozi  supv.  David Baumbach
Robin Rodrigue supv. David Baumbach
Christopher Walker supv. Darron Giron
Jennifer Bagwell supv. Darron Giron

Thanks for your help, hgm


EFF_DT PORTFOLIO_ID DOWN95
11/13/00 MANAGEMENT-CRD 0
11/13/00 MANAGEMENT-GAS 2,726,690
11/13/00 MANAGEMENT-PWR 243,892
11/13/00 AGG-MANAGEMENT 2,785,081


The PX confirmed receipt of EPMI's Notice of Termination as of 1:30 pm PST
today.  Afterwards, we tried to establish the time that the PX declared that
PG&E and Edison were in default so that we could, if necessary at a later
time, show that EPMI had terminated before that default.  Unfortunately, the
PX would not come out and say that a default had occurred, and as the day
wound down, employees at the PX became more and more taciturn.  Brett made
all of his calls on recorded lines, but I asked him to summarize the
conversations in writing.  I thought everyone would be interested in seeing
this.

Good work, Brett.

Steve
---------------------- Forwarded by Steve C Hall/PDX/ECT on 02/01/2001 05:46
PM ---------------------------

D Brett Hunsucker
02/01/2001 05:36 PM
To: Steve C Hall/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Chris Stokley/HOU/ECT, Murray P O'Neil/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Conversation w/PX re: Default on 2/1/01

Steve, per your request.

Holli Kreb's desk; Presched1: 13:40;   Spoke to David Dan (626.537.3555) @
CalPX.  Asked him: 1) if PG&E and SCE had made pmt yet, 2) If anyone had
defaulted  3)  Has the PX declared a default at this time.  David answer to
these questions was he hadn't heard of anything, but he isn't in a position
to know about these events.  He suggested I call Clark Cheng (x3243).
Immediately called Clark and left message asking these three questions, and
requested he call me ASAP.

Donald Robinson's desk; Presched1; approx. b/t 14:00 and 14:30.  Called Clark
Cheng @ CalPX.
Q:  Did PX rec. PG&E and SCE pmts?   A:  Can't tell right now.  Back office
is currently aggregating all of the data and trying to determine PX' position.
Q:  Has there been a default yet?  A:  No.  Too soon to tell.  PX doen's want
to arbitrarily make that call until they've had a chance to contact the
participant(s) and confirm an intent to default.
Q:  Has PX declared a default?  A:  No.  PX hasn't determined if they're
dealing with a default.  So, PX has not made any such claim or notice to that
effect at this time.
Q:  Once PX has had time to look at the data and determine if there has been
a default, how will that be communicated to the market participants?   A:  PX
plans on notifying the market via email.  PX anticipates an email will not go
out until Friday, 2/2/01.

Hope this helps.  Let me know if you need anything else.

Regards,

Brett


I am in for friday too.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"LeJune, Susie" <Susie_LeJune@kindermorgan.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22LeJune+2C+20Susie+22+20+3CSusie+5FLeJune+40kindermorgan+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Friday, July 27, 2001 8:12 AM
To:	Brewer, Stacey J.; Olinger, Kimberly S.; LeJune, Susie; Ward, Kim S (Houston); LeJune, Susie; mreese@cmsenergy.com; smcelroy@howellcorp.com
Subject:	RE: More info on the trip for those of you interested

Friday or Saturday sound good to me.  If there's stuff to do on the island,
let's go Friday, do stuff on Saturday, and sun on Sunday before we board.

Opinions, thoughts, ideas???.......

-----Original Message-----
From: Stacey.J.Brewer@enron.com [mailto:Stacey.J.Brewer@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 8:04 AM
To: Kimberly.S.Olinger@enron.com; Susie_LeJune@kindermorgan.com;
Kim.Ward@enron.com; Susie_LeJune@kindermorgan.com; mreese@cmsenergy.com;
smcelroy@howellcorp.com
Subject: RE: More info on the trip for those of you interested

I am good for Friday or Sat.  Actually I am game for anything

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   Olinger, Kimberly S.
   Sent:   Friday, July 27, 2001 8:03 AM
   To:     '"LeJune, Susie" <Susie_LeJune@kindermorgan.com>@ENRON'; Brewer,
             Stacey J.; Ward, Kim S (Houston); LeJune, Susie; melissa reese
             (E-mail); Sally Mcelroy (E-mail)
   Subject:  RE: More info on the trip for those of you interested

   i guess we just need to decide when we want to go up.  What is the vote?

      -----Original Message-----
     From:     "LeJune, Susie" <Susie_LeJune@kindermorgan.com>@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22LeJune+2C+20Susie+22+20+3CSusie+5FLeJune+40kindermorga
n+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]

     Sent:     Friday, July 27, 2001 7:53 AM
     To:  Brewer, Stacey J.; Olinger, Kimberly S.; Ward, Kim S (Houston);
               LeJune, Susie; melissa reese (E-mail); Sally Mcelroy
               (E-mail)
     Subject:  RE: More info on the trip for those of you interested

     Captain Oliver's looks fine to me.  FREE FOOD!!!!!!!!!!  And is that a
     swim
     up bar I see???  PERFECT!!!!!

     -----Original Message-----
     From: Brewer, Stacey J. [mailto:Stacey.J.Brewer@ENRON.com]
     Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 6:35 AM
     To: Olinger, Kimberly S.; Ward, Kim S (Houston); Susie LeJune
     (E-mail);
     melissa reese (E-mail); Sally Mcelroy (E-mail)
     Subject: FW: More info on the trip for those of you interested

     The islands of visitation are as follows:

     St. Barts
     Anguilla
     Nevis
     St.Kitts

     Windjammer will give a discount at the following hotels:

     Captain Olivers total of $210.00 /night per room not person with free
     breakfast (assuming continental breakfast)
     Great Bay Beach Resort total of $290.00 / night per room not person no
     breakfast

     These hotels can be seen on www.wheretostay.com

     After deposit on Monday the total final payment due on Nov 8th is
     $1,055.00 and if we include air it will be $ 1,939.73

     We do not have to book air now.  We can actually wait til Dec if we
     want
     however the airfare is not guaranteed at $884.73.  The flights to St.
     Maarten are not as long so it looks like we would be in at about 2:30
     ish.

     If you have any questions please ask me I will try to find out and
     pass
     it onto everyone.

     See ya!  Stacey

     >  -----Original Message-----
     > From:   Brewer, Stacey J.
     > Sent:   Wednesday, July 25, 2001 8:35 AM
     > To:     melissa reese (E-mail)
     > Subject:     FW: I have taken on the role of Party Planner....
     >
     > Here ye Here ye!
     >
     > Since we have not had a chance to make up our minds on what we would
     > like to do.  I have decided with a little help from Kim #1 to at
     least
     > get us booked for the Jan 7 th sailing out of St. Marteen.  No, you
     do
     > not have to go on this cruise.  I am not twisting your arms.  The
     > booking will go away if the deposit is not paid on 7/30/01.  Here
     are
     > the specifics!
     >
     > I have three deck cabins holding in our names.
     >
     > Cruise cost $1100.00 / person
     > Stowaway cost $55.00 / person
     > Port charges $65.00 / person
     > Insurance  $85.00 / person
     >
     > total cost before air $1305.00 / person
     >
     > Air cost is $884.73 round trip / person
     >
     > Deposit for trip is $250.00 / person DUE ON 7/30/01
     >
     > If not the deposit is not paid then the booking is lost and no harm
     > done unless this is what we want.  Let me know what you all
     > think......

     **********************************************************************
     This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its
     relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and
     privileged material for the sole use of the intended
     recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure
     by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the
     intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the
     recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron
     Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com
     and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and
     any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer
     (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding
     and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any
     of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other
     party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis
     of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
     **********************************************************************


Hey guys,

Just wanted to drop a line and let you know that I'm going to be visiting
London over the next 5 days or so.  I'm planning on swinging by the offices
Monday morning to see everyone and just wanted to foreworn you all.
Hopefully, I'll get a chance to see you then.

Susan

If anyone wants to get a hold of me you can leave a message on my friend
Emily's phone 020 7243 5453.


Russell:  the following baseload deals were done with JC Energy for August

PGT Malin  1896/day @ 4.10
PGT Tuscarora  350/day @ 4.10

Thanks.


Rob,

I have completed revisions to the attached GISB as discussed.  We agree to
your Special Provisions.  Please note this version will not show your special
provisions as I am in the process of integrating same.

Please review the GISB and let me know if you have any questions or
comments.  I will prepare execution documents.

Best regards,
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Group,

Cuts are on the way. While most can be zeroed out in Enpower (for LD's) like normal, longterm contracts will require an annuity for the value of the cut on that particular day. In the interest of being uniform, the guidelines for cuts are below.

We will be handling cuts in the following manner:

1. Documentation is priority #1. We need to fill out a cut sheet with the times, the name of the person who called, the tag number, the quantity and price.

2. After attempting to resupply the cut or find an alternate sink we need to carefully document changes in the new enpower workspace.

3. We need to zero out all cut deals in Enpower, we then need to calculate the value of the deals and make an annuity. The annuity must be made HE 1 on the following day of the schedule. The annuity needs to be for 1 mw for the value of the zeroed out contract. In the comment section of the annuity you must include the Enpower deal # of the cut deal and should include an indication of the number of mws each hour and the contract price--for example (4 hours @ 25 mws X $100 per mw = $10,000).

4. Please be as accurate as possible. We still need to be flat in Enpower at the end of each day. And we still need to calculate our daily position.

5. Put all cut sheets in the accordion folder on Kate Symes' Desk.

I appreciate your help and diligence.
Thanks,

Bill


So is Deerfield in Mississippi?

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 8:51 AM
To: Suzanne.Adams@enron.com
Subject: Deerfield Development Review Committee Hearing - June 11th

fyi.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 06/06/2001 08:50
AM ---------------------------

From: Steven Krimsky/ENRON@enronXgate on 06/06/2001 08:47 AM

To:   Ben Jacoby/ENRON@enronXgate, Eric Thode/ENRON@enronXgate, Steven
Rose/ENRON@enronXgate, Dave Kellermeyer/ENRON@enronXgate, Kay
Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Raimund Grube/ENRON@enronXgate, Lea
Sooter/ENRON@enronXgate, cabrera@pbworld.com@SMTP@enronXgate,
dsmith@edsaplan.com@SMTP@enronXgate,
currog@bellsouth.net@SMTP@enronXgate, gfhhai@msn.com@SMTP@enronXgate,
bernardkinney@aol.com@SMTP@enronXgate,
kabainc@bellsouth.net@SMTP@enronXgate,
redelstein@ensr.com@SMTP@enronXgate,
jessica@curtisrogers.com@SMTP@enronXgate,
charlotte@bitner.com@SMTP@enronXgate,
sosbourne@ensr.com@SMTP@enronXgate,
amontero@edsaplan.com@SMTP@enronXgate,
walter.bertschinger@mcmtrans.com@SMTP@enronXgate
cc:

Subject:  Deerfield Development Review Committee Hearing - June 11th

Please plan to attend the hearing next Monday the 11th at 1:00 pm at
Deerfield Beach City Hall.? Should everything go well, this will be the
only public hearing in Deerfield.

We will be getting with each of you regarding presentational material, etc.

Also, please plan to attend a pre-meeting at?Keith & Associates Monday at
10:00 am.

Regards,
Steve


And to start off the week.....

California's new State Song! The Rolling Blackout Theme Song
(To the theme music from the TV western "Rawhide")
Rollin', rollin', rollin',
Though the state is golden,
Keep them blackouts rollin', statewide.
A little colder weather,
And we all freeze together,
Wishin' more plants were on the line.
All the things I'm missin',
Like lights and television,
Are waiting 'til we can pay the price.
(Chorus)
Turn 'em on, turn 'em off,
Shut 'em down, block 'em out,
Turn 'em on, turn 'em off, statewide!
Brown 'em out, black 'em out,
Charge 'em more, give 'em less,
Let the pols fix the mess, statewide!
Keep movin', movin', movin',
Though they're disapprovin',
Keep them rates a-movin', statewide.
Don't try to understand 'em,
Just raise, charge, and collect 'em.
Soon we'll be livin' high and wide.
My heart's calculatin',
Nuclear plants will be waitin',
Be waitin' at the end of my ride.
(Chorus)
Turn 'em on, turn 'em off,
Shut 'em down, block 'em out,
Turn 'em on, turn 'em off, statewide!
Brown 'em out, black 'em out,
Charge 'em more, give 'em less,
Let the pols fix the mess, statewide!
STATEWIDE! Hyaah!


I just sent an email to Chris telling him to stop sending me this email.  I
guess he needs to send it.


Dear Chris,

  This e-mail is to explain my research on the following:

	1
   The ST_California desk's negative $903,422.49 DPR Impact for deal # 501520.1 on 1/21/01 - after speaking with Mark Confer in Houston, it seems that per the request of EES, we have made changes to this deal.  January 21, 2001 was a Sunday.  During that week in January, on-peak prices were at $321 and off peak prices were at $212.

When deal # 501520 was originally entered, it was entered as such:

HE	MW	Price
HE 1	471.25	 $  212.00
HE 2	461.75	 $  212.00
HE 3	456.9	 $  212.00
HE 4	455.03	 $  212.00
HE 5	457.48	 $  212.00
HE 6	469.6	 $  212.00
HE 7	488.07	 $  321.00
HE 8	496.05	 $  321.00
HE 9	510.37	 $  321.00
HE 10	508.1	 $  321.00
HE 11	518.5	 $  321.00
HE 12	522.58	 $  321.00
HE 13	525.54	 $  321.00
HE 14	525.82	 $  321.00
HE 15	525.58	 $  321.00
HE 16	525.52	 $  321.00
HE 17	524.95	 $  321.00
HE 18	525.73	 $  321.00
HE 19	525.74	 $  321.00
HE 20	526.73	 $  321.00
HE 21	525.04	 $  321.00
HE 22	513.96	 $  321.00
HE 23	501.07	 $  212.00
HE 24	486.22	 $  212.00

The bolded MW's at on-peak hours should have been entered at the Sunday off-peak price of $212, not $321, hence $212 all day.
The $321 price on the 8288.28 MW from HE 7 to HE 22 were "corrected" on 2-7-01 and the correct price of $212 was entered instead.

8288.28 MW x $109.00 price difference = $903,422.52 difference.

		2
The ST_California desk's negative $286,316.24 DPR Impact for deal # 508956.1 on 1/31/01: looks like cuts were made to the schedule.  Kate Symes is researching this with me.  It cuts are what happened, then the DPR impact should go back to zero when we find out what the other side of the deal is and we cut it too.

I've spoken to Jeff Richter about both of these deals.  He understands that the $903,422 impact is a true impact and will not be reversed.

Please contact me with any questions you may have.

Virginia


John,  Attached are the O&M  and the Lease Agreement for the StageCoach
Transaction.  Please review.


(See attached file: HPLN0202.xls)

 - HPLN0202.xls


Because I'm not quite sure who to direct this request to, I'm e-mailing
everyone I think might be involved in entering new counterparty names. One of
our mid-marketers has executed a deal with Sierra Pacific Holding Company,
which is a new counterparty name and needs to be added as a choice in
Enpower. Please let me know if I've contacted the correct people, and if I've
contacted the incorrect people. (Sorry!)

Thanks,
Kate Symes
Trading Support
503-464-7486


Sally- got your voice mail as well. Don't want to create more meetings. Just had a total of three market risk people quit or transfer and each one said one of the considerations was they spent so much time on operational issues that they weren't developing as they should analyzing portfolio risk. I think it might be best if we have a meeting or two and see what issues are identified. It may be better to split in two meetings as you suggested. I need to hear what the nature of the problems are. Some I know like ees, metals, uk power but I think there may be some other fundamental issues that are hindering progress here. No need for you to attend. I will let you know what we come up with including if there are no issues at all! Rick

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Sally+20Beck_HOU_ECT+40ECT@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Monday, April 23, 2001 6:08 PM
To:	Buy, Rick
Cc:	Causey, Richard
Subject:	Re: Operational Issues

Focusing the right people on the right issues is always a good idea.  I would like to visit with you to understand what you mean by "operational issues".  My team has a meeting every other Monday focused on operational risk and we have various working groups that focus on key projects or initiatives that vary with need.  A daily meeting on operational issues would need to have the appropriate team members there, and I hesitate to add an additional meeting to any key folks on my team if operational projects/initiatives are being covered either in our Monday operational risk meeting or in another forum.   --Sally

From:	Rick Buy/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/23/2001 04:55 PM
To:	Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Port/ENRON@enronXgate, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Shona Wilson/NA/Enron@Enron, William S Bradford/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:	Ted Murphy/LON/ECT@ECT, Richard Causey/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject:	Operational Issues

I think the daily IT issue meeting has been quite successful in addressing problems in systems and working toward resolution on systems related issues. I would like to expand the scope of this meeting to include daily operational issues as well.

I plan on restarting my attendance at these meetings on Wednesday. Can the RAC people listed above please make a start at some of the recurring issues.

Thanks, Rick


Don't forget to cancel that PAC for me?

Talk to you later.

Chris


Main Entry: su?per?flu?i?ty
Function: noun
Inflected Form(s): plural -ties
Etymology: Middle English superfluitee, from Middle French superfluit?, from Late Latin superfluitat-, superfluitas, from Latin superfluus
Date: 14th century
1 a : EXCESS , OVERSUPPLY b : something unnecessary or superfluous
2 : immoderate and especially luxurious living, habits, or desires
Bottom of Form 0

Kate Symes
Real Time Trading Support
Office/503-464-7744
Cell/503-819-2181
Fax/503-464-7996


Pls update my calendar.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Michael Reddy" <Mreddy@epsa.org>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Michael+20Reddy+22+20+3CMreddy+40epsa+2Eorg+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Tuesday, August 14, 2001 1:24 PM
To:	acomnes@enron.com; Hawkins, Bernadette; Nersesian, Carin; Nicolay, Christi L.; Fulton, Donna; Scheuer, Janelle; jhartso@enron.com; Shelk, John; Jsteffe@enron.com; Noske, Linda J.; Robertson, Linda; Alvarez, Ray; Shapiro, Richard; Novosel, Sarah; sscott3@enron.com; Mara, Susan; Hoatson, Tom
Subject:	August 17th Power Marketing Conference Call Agenda

MEMORANDUM

TO: Regulatory Affairs Committee
       Power Marketing Working Group

FROM: Jim Steffes, Regulatory Affairs Committee Chair
            Bob Reilley, Power Marketers Working Group Chair
            Julie Simon, Vice President of Policy

DATE: August 14, 2001

RE: August 17th Power Marketing Conference Call
      ?Friday, 11:30 a.m. (EDT) - NOTE DATE AND TIME
       CHANGE

Due to the ongoing FERC RTO settlement conferences, we will hold this week's Power Marketers Working Group conference call on Friday, August 17th, at 11:30 A.M. (EDT).  To access the call, dial 1-800-937-6563.  Ask for the Julie Simon/EPSA Call.  An agenda is outlined below.

August 17, 2001 Conference Call Agenda

?  California
   ?  Rehearing of Refund Order
      ?  Draft to follow
   ?  California Refund Prehearing Conference
   ?  PNW Refund Case

?  New York

?  Alliance

?  NE RTO Settlement Conference

?  SE RTO Settlement Conference

?  GISB Meeting

?  EPSA Legislative & Regulatory Committees Joint Meeting on NAERO
   Legislation: August 20th


Thanks for the update, Jay.  If this guy doesn't have time to talk to you, he
just not want to do business with Enron too badly!  I wouldn't waste a whole
lot of time on this.  Happy Easter...SRS

Jay Fitzgerald
04/21/2000 11:22 AM
To: Jeff Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Franz Edward Alphonse

I have been in contact with this guy.  He didn't have time to speak on first
contact, so we set up a time to talk on Monday, and he did not call and was
unavailable when I rang him.  Looking forward to his return call...

Jay

	From:  Jeff Skilling                           03/29/2000 12:47 PM

Sent by: Sherri Sera
To: Jay Fitzgerald/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Karen Marshall/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Franz Edward Alphonse

Jay, Jeff received a call yesterday from a 2nd year HBS student and
co-founder of a B2B commerce company - Franz Edward Alphonse - who wanted to
speak to Jeff (for the ever-popular "5 minutes") about his company.  Jeff has
asked that you follow up with this gentleman.  His phone number is
617.493.5597.

(Karen, I'm copying you in the event you have any information on Mr. Alphonse
- i.e., did he interview w/Enron and if so, how did he do).

Thanks, Jay.  Please send Jeff a note with any update once you have spoken to
Franz.

SRS

PS - I'm back from Italy and ready to have that drink whenever it works for
you and Greg.  I understand he's out for a few weeks now while he moves his
family to Houston...