fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 07/19/2001
08:37 AM ---------------------------
From: Michael Terraso/ENRON@enronXgate on 07/18/2001 07:17 PM

To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron

cc:

Subject: FW: 18/7 - 7:00 p.m. - Update: Emergency

Steve, fyi Mike Terraso

-----Original Message-----
From: Hawkins, Don
Sent: Wed 7/18/2001 5:29 PM
To: Lowry, Phil; Terraso, Michael
Cc:
Subject: FW: 18/7 - 7:00 p.m. - Update: Emergency

FYI,

Don

;-----Original Message-----
From: ; Steve Hopper/TRANSREDES@TRANSREDES@ENRON [
mailto:IMCEANOTES-Steve+20Hopper_TRANSREDES+40TRANSREDES+40ENRON@ENRON.com];
On Behalf Of Steve Hopper/TRANSREDES@ENRON

Sent:;; Wednesday, July 18, 2001 4:24 PM
To:;;;; Hopper, Steve
Cc:;;;; nick.tombs@shell.com.br; Johannes.Walzebuck@shell.com.br; Weidler,
Peter E; Henshaw, Tony; Gonzalez, Fernando; Farmer, Doug; Berg, Jan van den;
Naphan, John; Vega, John; Callau, Juan; Hawkins, Don; Khan, Nasim; Powell,
Laine; NLIMBREI@shell.com.br; Marcelo.Menicucci@shell.com.br

Subject:;;;;;;; Re: 18/7 - 7:00 p.m. - Update: Emergency

 We have completed the inspection of the GAA line to LaPaz, and everything
looks OK.; We'll reinitiate gas flow tonight.; OSSA II should be completed
tomorrow.; Army personnel continues to be patrolling the area, but things
remain pretty calm, despite several areas in the country that are under
roadblock by protesters.

 I'm going to keep things in emergency status until at least tomorrow, after
today's roadblocks are lifted.; Will advise of any developments.

 Steve

 Steve Hopper
07/17/2001 07:02 PM

To:;;;; nick.tombs@shell.com.br, Johannes.Walzebuck@shell.com.br, Peter E
Weidler/Enron@EnronXGate
cc:;;;; Tony Henshaw/TRANSREDES@TRANSREDES, Fernando
Gonzalez/TRANSREDES@TRANSREDES, Doug Farmer/TRANSREDES@TRANSREDES, Jan van
den Berg/TRANSREDES@TRANSREDES, John Naphan/TRANSREDES@TRANSREDES, John
Vega/TRANSREDES@TRANSREDES, Juan Callau/TRANSREDES@TRANSREDES, Don
Hawkins/Enron@EnronXGate, Nasim H Khan/TRANSREDES@TRANSREDES, Laine A
Powell/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

 Subject:;;;;;;; 17/7 - 7:00 p.m. - Update: Emergency

 The situation continues to be stable.; CLHB has reinitated LPG operations to
LaPaz, but continue their inspection.; TR will not reinitiate gas or crude
export operations until we have completed our inspection.; We have formed
joint teams with CLHB and Army personnel to perform the inspection.; It could
take as long as 48 hours, but we'll have a better estimate after we get a
progress report in the morning.;; All crews available systemwide are
mobilizing for inspection of the entire system, but for now our priority
continues to be the lines in the altiplano.; The three stations in the
altiplano have been shut down, bled off, and locked.; Other supervisors
throughout the system have been advised and are on alert.

 Government and regulator continue to be supportive of our shut-down and
inspection action plan.; We have developed a contingency plan with COBEE (the
regional electricity distributor) under which they will redistribute energy
out of spare capacity in Cochabamba to LaPaz; - this should cover LaPaz's
electricity needs during the duration of time we need to complete our
inspection.; The only other significant consumer is a large cement plant in
LaPaz.; We've agreed that they will slow down their operations, and provide
only small, local supplies (industrial concrete demand will be shut-in).

 We did not send a press release on the issue, although we have received
inquiries - our response is that we are concerned about the risk to Bolivians
this action presented, and we are performing an inspection on the system.; We
are avoiding mention of gas stoppage to LaPaz at this time, due to the
volatility of the issue in LaPaz.; Government (VMEH, SIRESE) has agreed with
the message.

 We expect that with the cement plant and power plant off-line, line pack
should be sufficient to keep commercial demand satisfied for a few days.; In
either event, we are working with the local gas distributor to prepare a
notice for LaPaz newspapers instructing gas consumers in the area how to
safely shut-down and restart their equipment in the event that it becomes
necessary.

 The most likely scenario as of now is that Edwin Morales - a local
revolutionary tied to the coca trade - is behind the action.; Morales has had
contact in the past with the Raul Rocha bunch out of Chuquina (Oruro), so
we're still not sure whether this was an act against TR and/or the industry,
or if it is against government.; Morales has just joined forces with another
rebel out of Cochabamba and is planning nationwide road blocks for tomorrow.;
Their agenda is national - they've never isolated TR or our industry as a
whole, although Chaco in the north have been targeted in the past, probably
because they have a field in the middle of Morales' stronghold.; The
political situation here is tenuous with Banzer out and various political
interests looking to fill the leadership void.; We're watching this situation
closely.; The local Army brigade has committed to staying on vigilance for at
least the next few days - once we're comfortable with the operational
situation, we'll discuss a longer-term solution.

 Steve

 ---------------------- Forwarded by Steve Hopper/TRANSREDES on 07/17/2001
06:37 PM ---------------------------

 Steve Hopper
07/17/2001 03:53 PM

To:;;;; nick.tombs@shell.com.br, Johannes.Walzebuck@shell.com.br, Peter E
Weidler/Enron@EnronXGate
cc:;;;;;

 Subject:;;;;;;; Emergency

 ;;;;;;;  ;;;;;;;

 At 1:45 p.m. today, a CLHB line walker discovered a bomb on their LPG line
in the Altiplano 14 km from out SicaSica station.; Our OSSA II (crude exports
to Chile) and GAA (gas to LaPaz) share the same ROW, and would likely have
been taken out with the bomb.; We understand that the bomb, which had a
manual fuse, did not go off, but had been lit and failed to explode.; The
Army has been mobilized to diffuse the bomb, and we consider the immediate
threat neutralized.

 However, given that we have now seen several attempts in the last 10 days of
sabotage against our lines, I have declared a state of EMERGENCY, and will
notify the Enron Crisis team.

 We have shut all Altiplano pipeline operations down, and have mobilized a
joint CLHB/TR/Army team to perform vigilance on the entire altiplano
network.; The immediate result of this is that lights will likely start to go
out in LaPaz within the next few hours - the GAA line is their primary power
fuel supply.; I've notified all relevant government authorities of the
situation, and so far am getting support.; I've also asked the Embassy to
look into the situation, with the understanding that if this is the result of
an organized movement, they might have access to intelligence that could be
helpful.

 Additionally, we've shut down all non-critical maintenance operations
throughtout the rest of the system, and are directing spare personnel to
perform vigilance on the remainder of the system as quickly as possible.;
Until and unless we have information that this threat goes beyond the
altiplano, we will continue operations, with all stations on alert.; We will
kick off the the total system inspection within the next few hours, as soon
as our people complete the overall plan.

 I will keep you posted as things develop.

 Steve


You have received this email because you are listed as a security approver.
Please click
http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000008544&Page=
Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000008544
Request Create Date : 11/29/00 9:30:01 AM
Requested For       : wes.williams@enron.com
Resource Name       : EOL US Backoffice  Product Data Manager
Resource Type       : Applications


Karen, please call me when you receive this email.  Thank you.  Rick
Slemaker, Publisher

 - Ken Lay Denne letter 20015.pdf
 - PBS WETV Info.pdf


Phil,
 Please review the attached and let me know what other changes need to be
made.  I have added a sentence in Other of each to provide for the Force
Majeure Language to be attached as Exhibit A.  Please let me know if you
think this will work.
I will be out Monday, but in early Tuesday.  Please call my assistant to set
up an appointment for Early Tuesday.


- SUN1017.xls


Start Date: 2/5/02; HourAhead hour: 4;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002020504.txt
!!!General SQL error.
Couldn't update; currently locked by user 'admin' on machine 'ECTHOU-BPS3'.
Table

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTstNW
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 2/5/02
  TIE_POINT: MALIN_5_RNDMTN
  INTERCHG_ID: ENRJ_CISO_3000
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM


Mark

This is probably something for your team and not quite sure why I am in the
middle of this.

Regards

Marcus
---------------------- Forwarded by Marcus Nettelton/NA/Enron on 11/07/2000
08:55 AM ---------------------------
From: Alfred Pennisi@MGUSA on 11/07/2000 08:03 AM EST
To: Marcus Nettelton/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: MAP Filing

Marcus,

Do we have a Chart for MAP's?
Do we have policies and procedures for Enron Trading Services Inc.?

I am going to forward an e-mail to you from Paul Pantano, the outside
attorney I am working with to file the Risk Assessement filing with the CFTC.

regards,

Alfred Pennisi
Enron Trading Services Inc
520 Madison Avenue
28th Floor
New York, NY 10022
Tel: 212.715.5845
E-mail: alfred.pennisi@enron.com


Dear Andy

Thanks for your mail and we would be in touch with Mr. Jay Webb to further
our partnership. We have identified specific areas where TechSpan could
bring immediete value to Enron (Both from a technical and cost perspective)
and we look forward to discussing this with Jay.

Also, our Managing Partner (Mr.Puneet Pushkarna) is keen in discussing our
view on the partnership and the Strategic Nature of a long term association
with Enron(as has been discussed in our Board meetings with Goldman Sachs).
I would arrange this meeting with yourself, Mr. Jay  and our Sr.Management,
subsequent to our discussions with Mr. Jay Web.

Dear Jay

Good to know you. In fact, some of our B2B architects have heard about you
in terms managing the entire technical process for developing EnronOnline
and look forward to meeting you. I would fix up a time for our VP - Software
Delivery to discuss synergies and value proposition.

Andy, Jay, i sincerely hope that you have been able to get good insight into
our competencies from the e-commerce perspective and that Enron shares a
similar view on this potential association. Also, i am sure that there would
be multiple firms who are keen in associating with an esteemed company such
as Enron but the main differentiating factor would be in the companies who
are creative, Innovative and who could add significant value for your
current and future challenges. TechSpan strives to incorporate such an
approach with our clients and also the factor for our funding from Goldman
Sachs.

Thanks and looking forward to developing a long term mutually beneficial
relationship with Enron.

Regds, Arvind

Tel	: 408. 530.5570
Cell	: 408. 828.6391

www.techspan.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Andy.Zipper@enron.com [mailto:Andy.Zipper@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 6:02 AM
To: Arvind.Ramanathan@techspan.com
Subject: RE: Value Proposition for Enron from TechSpan

Arvind,
The propoer contact at Enron for you is Jay Webb. He can be reached at
jay.webb@enron.com. I will foward this to him.

Good Luck,
Andy Zipper


FYI, See Below

Eric Gillaspie
713-345-7667
Enron Building 3886
----- Forwarded by Eric Gillaspie/HOU/ECT on 08/08/2000 02:43 PM -----

	Veronica Espinoza@ENRON
	08/08/2000 02:32 PM

		 To: Eric Gillaspie/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Brad Schneider/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: Entex assignment of contracts

As a matter of fact, we received a fax copy of the gty in favor of Resources
Corp.  Now  all of the credit issues are taken care of and we can proceed
with the legal assignment issues.  Also, we have already communicated to the
EOL team to have their status changed to reflect the assignment/new entity.

Give me a call if I could be of any further help.

VE

Eric Gillaspie@ECT
08/08/2000 02:19 PM
To: Veronica Espinoza/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Entex assignment of contracts

Veronica,

I believe I spoke with you a few weeks ago about a credit check for the
assignment of a gas transportation contract from Entex Gas Marketing Company
to Entex Gas Resources Corp.  Could I have an update on the situation?

Thanks,

Eric Gillaspie
713-345-7667
Enron Building 3886
----- Forwarded by Eric Gillaspie/HOU/ECT on 08/08/2000 02:16 PM -----

	Brant Reves
	07/19/2000 08:12 AM

		 To: Veronica Espinoza/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brad
Schneider/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Eric Gillaspie/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Entex assignment of contracts

Russell,

Please follow up on this and pursue a guaranty amendment if neccesary.

Thanks
brant

---------------------- Forwarded by Brant Reves/HOU/ECT on 07/19/2000 08:08
AM ---------------------------

Eric Gillaspie
07/12/2000 04:19 PM
To: Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Entex assignment of contracts

Mr. Reves,

I have not received a response in regards to the assignment of the Entex
contracts (as discussed below) from a credit standpoint.  We would like to
make the assignment as soon as possible so long as credit does not have an
issue with the new Entex entity.

Thanks,

Eric Gillaspie
713-345-7667
Enron Building 3886
----- Forwarded by Eric Gillaspie/HOU/ECT on 07/12/2000 03:54 PM -----

	Eric Gillaspie
	06/27/2000 04:49 PM

		 To: Brant Reves/HOU/ECT
		 cc: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jackie Morgan/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Entex assignment of contracts

Mr. Reeves,

Entex Gas Marketing intends to assign certain interruptible gas
transportation agreements to a new company of theirs which is:

 Entex Gas Resources Corp.  (it is a TX Corp.)
 P.O. Box 200905
 Houston, TX 77216

Would you please run a credit check on this new entity.

Thanks,

Eric Gillaspie
713-345-7667
Enron Building 3886


To The Core Aggregator Group:

 I have enclosed my near-to-final draft of the core aggregators'
reply brief in the CPUC's gas industry restructuring case (I.99-07-003).  As
you know, the reply brief is due to be filed today.  Please provide me with
your comments on the draft no later than noon today.  Thank you for your
attention to this matter.

   -John

 <<#1539913 v1 - CORE-BRIEF - Reply Brief in Support of Comprehensive
Setlement.doc>> S

**************

CONFIDENTIAL

Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps LLP
600 West Broadway
Suite 2600
San Diego, CA 92101-3391
(619) 236-1414

The information contained in this electronic mail transmission is
confidential and intended to be sent only to the stated recipient of the
transmission.  It may therefore be protected from unauthorized use or
dissemination by the attorney-client and/or attorney work-product
privileges.  If you are not the intended recipient or the intended
recipient's agent, you are hereby notified that any review, use,
dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly
prohibited.  You are also asked to notify us immediately by telephone and to
delete this transmission with any attachments and destroy all copies in any
form.  Thank you in advance for your cooperation.

 - #1539913 v1 - CORE-BRIEF - Reply Brief in Support of Comprehensive
Setlement.doc


Mike, Craig, Lucy,

No problem. The last Issue I have is June. GD may have been referring to
the July issue. We can ask Ed on Wednesday. I would also take his advice
with a grain of salt.

Vince

	From:  Mike A Roberts                           07/10/2000 10:40 AM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: ESAI

Vince-

Craig Braislau and Lucy Ortiz saw ESAI write-up in Gas Daily today.

They called and found out Ed Kraples was planning to visit with you this
Wednesday

Wanted to know if they could join meeting

They would like a copy of the latest Natural Gas Stockwatch

do you have it?

thanks

- - - Mike


Attached is a revised letter to Jim Hawes.  Please review and provide me with
any comments.

Thanks.


_________________________________________________________________

WEEKEND SYSTEMS AVAILABILITY

FOR

2/1/2002 5:00:00 PM through 2/4/2002 12:00:00 AM
_________________________________________________________________

Impact:   Corp
Time:   Sat 2/2/2002 5:30:00 PM CT thru Sat 2/2/2002 7:30:00 PM CT
	Sat 2/2/2002 3:30:00 PM PT thru Sat 2/2/2002 5:30:00 PM PT
	Sat 2/2/2002 11:30:00 PM London thru Sun 2/3/2002 1:30:00 AM London
Outage:   Maintenance of NAHOU-SQUFY04S & 05S
Environments Impacted:   Estate Unify Production.
Purpose:   Preventive maintenance on two cluster member servers.
Backout:   None
Contact(s):   Skinner, Tony  713-345-9334
	Jordan, Mark  713-286-5308
	Warner, John  713-345-1756

Impact:   EES
Time:   Fri 2/1/2002 3:00:00 PM CT thru Fri 2/1/2002 11:00:00 PM CT
	Fri 2/1/2002 1:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 2/1/2002 9:00:00 PM PT
	Fri 2/1/2002 9:00:00 PM London thru Sat 2/2/2002 5:00:00 AM London
Outage:   Upgrade EESHOU-DBRGS from NT 40 to W2K server
Environments Impacted:   SQL database
Purpose:   Server needs to be upgraded to windows 2000 and SQL 2000 to meet corp standards
Backout:   Restore original configuration from tape backup
Contact(s):   Nguyen, James  713-345-6137

Impact:   Corp
Time:   Thur 1/31/2002 5:00:00 PM CT thru Fri 2/1/2002 7:00:00 AM CT
	Thur 1/31/2002 3:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 2/1/2002 5:00:00 AM PT
	Thur 1/31/2002 11:00:00 PM London thru Fri 2/1/2002 1:00:00 PM London
Outage:   Replace disk on Envision
Environments Impacted:   Corporate-wide applications accessing the Envision web query, FileNet Panagon IDM Desktop, FileNet IDM for R3, Panagon Capture professional. Users will be able to access IBuyit and IPayit from SAP but will not be able to view invoices.
Purpose:   Maintenance is needed to repair bad disk
Backout:   None
Contact(s):   Vollmer, Mary  713-853-3381
	Rye, Gregory  713-345-3022

Impact:   Corp
Time:   Sat 2/2/2002 6:00:00 AM CT thru Sat 2/2/2002 9:00:00 AM CT
	Sat 2/2/2002 4:00:00 AM PT thru Sat 2/2/2002 7:00:00 AM PT
	Sat 2/2/2002 12:00:00 PM London thru Sat 2/2/2002 3:00:00 PM London
Outage:   Reindex Envision database
Environments Impacted:   Corporate-wide applications accessing the Envision web query, FileNet Panagon IDM Desktop, FileNet IDM for R3, Panagon Capture professional. Users will be able to access IBuyit and IPayit from SAP but will not be able to view invoices.
Purpose:   Maintenance needed to correct performance issues
Backout:   None
Contact(s):   Vollmer, Mary  713-853-3381
	Rye, Gregory  713-345-3022


Never mind.  They are now changing their price to 6.23.  Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Megan Parker/Corp/Enron on 01/22/2001
02:58 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Megan Parker                           01/22/2001 02:50 PM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: PG&E Texas 11/00

Just a heads up... you might be getting a call from PG&E regarding the price
difference on deal 510422.  Their trader is staying with 6.26.

Megan


FYI----Don't know what happened to my recommendation that they use either an
unexecuted agreement notation or call the counterparty from the trading floor
on a recorded line.
---------------------- Forwarded by Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT on 08/30/99 01:37 PM
---------------------------

Julie Meyers
08/30/99 01:26 PM
To: Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kathryn Cordes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donald P Reinhardt/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan
Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vance L Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: GTC'S AND CONFIRMS

Re 1. I don't believe that the traders on 35 are appropriately covered based
on what Dan has told me.  Is that a concern?  If so, it is possible to
manually change the confirm to fit the situation for the mean time.

Re 3.  I understand what Mary is saying, but in these cases that I'm
referring to (which I believe are rare), I believe the gas is flowing.  The
meter has been turned on and isn't the pipeline accepting the gas?  We are
still not nominating the gas, and because we have not put the ticket into the
system, we are withholding payment.  Now, from what I understand, client
services will make a manual payment, if they are called by the producer.
But, for 1 month or even 2 months, we have not made a payment, because client
services would not have known to make a payment, therefore, we are still in
violation.  It appears the best solution legally, would be not to turn on the
meter until the contract is signed.  I'm not sure that is a good business
decission though.

I know that there are cases where we don't know that the meter is still
flowing, or that it has been turned on.  I think the easiest thing would be
to make sure that we are covered with a GTC spot, taking out the language of
the recorded line.

Julie

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Melissa Graves                           08/30/99 10:37 AM

To: Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kathryn Cordes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donald P Reinhardt/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan
Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vance L Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: GTC'S AND CONFIRMS

Julie,

In response to your concerns below:

1.  The traders on 35 are currently attempting to install a recorded line to
be used when negotiating.

2.  The difficulty with putting in a contract as unexecuted is that Unify
will not prevent the payment from going out the door.  I do not believe Unify
Settlements drafts based on contract status, it drafts on any Sitara deal
that replicated down, and Sitara reads unexecuted as a valid contract.

3.  We have posed the possibility of entering the contract as unexecuted and
enhancing Unify to hold payment as long as there was VP approval to hold
payment, but Mary Cook said that this process would be in violation of the
UCC based on the fact that we would partially perform (by accepting the gas
via the nom/scheduling process).  With this partial performance, withholding
the payment would not be appropriate under the law.

Please let me know your thoughts after reviewing my comments.

Thank you,
Melissa

Julie Meyers
08/27/99 03:36 PM
To: Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kathryn Cordes/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: GTC'S AND CONFIRMS

While going through our confirmation process, there was some concern raised
on deals that we are not confirming.  I'm sure you are aware of the concern
that George W. had with not wanting a confirmation to go out to the producers
when they were trying to get a firm contract signed.  I spoke with Dan Hyvl
today and I wanted to relay to you his thoughts.

His first concern was if the Asset Traders were trading on a recorded phone
lines.  Apparently the GTC's specify that if there is a dispute with what is
on the confirmation, the recorded phone call would be the back up.  He said
that if these calls are not recorded, then we should not be using the GTC's.
In the case where the tickets are being held back until the contract is
signed (example: a ticket was submitted today to start back in June), then we
should be putting the contract in as unexecuted so the deal can be valued and
tracked.  His decision on that issue was based on my memory that if a
contract is marked unexecuted, Unify would not make payment.  If that is not
the case, we could still put the contract and deal in the systems, and have a
VP signed off that payment would not go out the door.

If deals are being done on an unrecorded phone line, Dan said that we would
need to do something different if the payment is to go out the door.  Like
for example, have the producer sign a one month contract.  Which I'm not sure
you would want to do that.  Otherwise, he said that the trades should be sent
down to 31 so they will be recorded.

I hope this makes sense.  Please call me, and let me know your thoughts.

Julie