Jeff---
Which paper published the article below?
---Jennifer

From: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON on 04/26/2001 05:42 PM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
To: Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Angela Schwarz/HOU/EES@EES, Beverly
Aden/HOU/EES@EES, Bill Votaw/HOU/EES@EES, Brenda Barreda/HOU/EES@EES, Carol
Moffett/HOU/EES@EES, Cathy Corbin/HOU/EES@EES, Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Christina Liscano/HOU/EES@EES, Craig H Sutter/HOU/EES@EES, Dan
Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Debora Whitehead/HOU/EES@EES, Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES,
Don Black/HOU/EES@EES, Dorothy Youngblood/HOU/ECT@ECT, Douglas
Huth/HOU/EES@EES, Edward Sacks/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Eric Melvin/HOU/EES@EES,
Erika Dupre/HOU/EES@EES, Evan Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Fran Deltoro/HOU/EES@EES,
Gayle W Muench/HOU/EES@EES, Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@ENRON, Gordon
Savage/HOU/EES@EES, Harold G Buchanan/HOU/EES@EES, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron@ENRON, Iris Waser/HOU/EES@EES, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@ENRON, James W Lewis/HOU/EES@EES, James Wright/Western
Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange, Jeff Messina/HOU/EES@EES, Jeremy
Blachman/HOU/EES@EES, Jess Hewitt/HOU/EES@EES, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kathy Bass/HOU/EES@EES, Kathy
Dodgen/HOU/EES@EES, Ken Gustafson/HOU/EES@EES, Kevin Hughes/HOU/EES@EES,
Leasa Lopez/HOU/EES@EES, Leticia Botello/HOU/EES@EES, Mark S
Muller/HOU/EES@EES, Marsha Suggs/HOU/EES@EES, Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES,
Meredith M Eggleston/HOU/EES@EES, Michael Etringer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael
Mann/HOU/EES@EES, Michelle D Cisneros/HOU/ECT@ECT, mpalmer@enron.com, Neil
Bresnan/HOU/EES@EES, Neil Hong/HOU/EES@EES, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Paula
Warren/HOU/EES@EES, Richard L Zdunkewicz/HOU/EES@EES, Richard
Leibert/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@ENRON, Rita
Hennessy/NA/Enron@ENRON, Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES, Rosalinda
Tijerina/HOU/EES@EES, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott Gahn/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES,
Sharon Dick/HOU/EES@EES, skean@enron.com, Tanya Leslie/HOU/EES@EES, Tasha
Lair/HOU/EES@EES, Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Terri Greenlee/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tim
Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tony Spruiell/HOU/EES@EES, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES,
Vladimir Gorny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wanda Curry/HOU/EES@EES, William S
Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kathryn Corbally/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jubran
Whalan/HOU/EES@EES, triley@enron.com, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert C
Williams/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Greg Wolfe/HOU/ECT@ECT, James
Wright/Western Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange, Dirk vanUlden/Western
Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange, Steve Walker/SFO/EES@EES, Jennifer
Rudolph/HOU/EES@EES, Martin Wenzel/SFO/HOU/EES@EES, Douglas
Condon/SFO/EES@EES, wgang@enron.com, Scott Govenar <sgovenar@govadv.com>,
Hedy Govenar <hgovenar@govadv.com> @ ENRON, jklauber@llgm.com, Mike D
Smith/HOU/EES@EES, John Neslage/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Janel
Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Eric Letke/DUB/EES@EES, Richard B
Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, gfergus@brobeck.com, Michael Tribolet/ENRON@enronXgate,
Robert Frank/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT,
gfergus@brobeck.com, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: CA Legislative Committee Hearing on California Border Gas Prices

FYI.  This is the presentation that the Brattle Group---a consulting group
that Edison has long used on gas issues in California---gave last week to the
legislative committee investigating wholesale gas prices at the California
Border.  The day following this presentation (which was followed by a
presentation by the California PUC's FERC lawyer), the committee called El
Paso and Dynegy to respond to Brattle's and the CPUC FERC lawyer's
presentations.  Also attached is the best synopsis of the hearing that I've
seen in the press.

Best,
Jeff
******************************************************************************
****************************************************
Competing evidence clouds Calif. investigation

Prompted in part by the California Public Utilities Commission, the
California Assembly
has been scrutinizing the role that interstate pipelines have played in the
state,s current
energy crisis. In the efforts to find a smoking gun, legislators have leaned
heavily on a
report prepared by The Brattle Group, a consultancy commissioned by utility
Southern California
Edison to dig up evidence of market power abuse.

But the state,s biggest transporter of gas to California -- El Paso Natural
Gas -- is not
ready to take the rap. The pipeline has commissioned its own study, which it
recently presented
as evidence that it has not circumvented any laws or regulation.

As reported in both the trade press and national media, SoCal Ed and the CPUC
are pointing
the finger of blame at El Paso for alleged manipulation of California border
prices through
affiliate deals and capacity hoarding. And exhibit A in their case against El
Paso is The Brattle
Group,s study of the California market.

Richard Zeiger, a spokesman for Assembly Member Darrell Steinberg, chairman
of the
California Assembly Judiciary Committee, told Gas Daily that The Brattle
Group,s market
study proved that the surge in gas prices at the California border was not
caused by normal
market forces (GD 4/20). His remarks followed an oversight hearing during
which Assembly
members questioned Dynegy and El Paso officials about their involvement in
the California
market.

El Paso presented a different version of events to the Assembly. In a report
presented to
legislators, a research group hired by El Paso concluded that a convergence
of factors, not a
conspiracy, caused the price run-up.

Lukens Consulting Group, a Houston-based consultancy, was retained by El Paso
to conduct
work on several fronts. In its study of the California market, Lukens
concluded that the
increasing convergence of the gas and electricity businesses was one of the
main culprits in the
California gas price imbroglio.

Assemblyman John Campbell, a Republican member of the oversight committee,
said he
"didn,t see any smoking gun" in either report.

"We had our committee hearing, and we certainly had a lot on the Brattle
Study and a little
on the Lukens study. To some degree, I,m not sure that the California
legislature is the best
place to adjudicate the differences between these two studies," Campbell
said. "I believe FERC
is looking at this situation " and it would seem to me that that,s the
appropriate place."

Campbell said that the CPUC had been prodding the California legislature to
give support
to its claims of market power abuse by pipelines. "It,s being pushed
basically by the Public
Utilities Commission here, which believes that there was collusion" by
pipeline companies to
push up gas prices in California, he said.

The CPUC, Campbell suggested, sought satisfaction before the California
assembly when
it had failed on the federal level: "There,s a concerted effort, not just on
natural gas but on other
things here in California, for entities and organizations here to point the
finger elsewhere for
the problems that we,re having in this state and I think you,re seeing some
of that with the
public utilities commission."

Whether either report wins over the public incensed by high natural gas
prices is a different
matter entirely. In the meanwhile, the dueling California market studies seem
to have taken
on a life of their own.

The Brattle Group Study, for instance, has become the center of a heavily
litigated effort to
force FERC to compel the release of market data by California market
participants. Following
on a request by SoCal Ed, which said it needed additional data to round out
The Brattle Group
report, FERC Chief ALJ Curtis Wagner issued subpoenas to the other three
major pipelines that
serve the state as well as to Sempra Energy Trading.

Several parties resisted FERC,s call for market information, saying the
requested data
contained commercially sensitive information. FERC allowed the discovery
process to move
forward but only after attaching strict data protection rules restricting
access to evidence
(GD 4/23).

Critics of the pipeline industry have already suffered one setback in their
case. The commission
recently dismissed the CPUC,s claim that El Paso rigged the auction of a
large block of
pipeline capacity in favor of affiliate El Paso Merchant Energy. In
addressing the California
Assembly, representatives of Dynegy said that FERC,s recent ruling on the
California border
controversy obviated the need for more investigation.

The controversy, however, is far from over. FERC last month also ordered a
hearing into
whether El Paso Natural Gas and its affiliates manipulated capacity to drive
up the price of gas
delivered into California (GD 3/29). That hearing is likely to take place
this summer. (RP00-
241, et al.) NH

----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 04/26/2001 05:23 PM -----

	Douglas.Porter@sce.com
	04/19/2001 11:36 AM

		 To: jeff.dasovich@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Sacramento Pres Final 4_13_01(projected).ppt

Per your request, attached are the presentation slides from yesterday.

Douglas Porter, Senior Attorney
Southern California Edison Company
(626)302-3964
(626)302-3990(fax)
douglas.porter@sce.com(See attached file: DRT2486.PPT)
 - DRT2486.PPT


I left Skilling a message on this. Lets see what he has to say. Rick

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bradford, William S.
Sent:	Tuesday, April 03, 2001 1:00 PM
To:	Buy, Rick
Subject:	FW: Flying Crocodile

FYI

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rohauer, Tanya
Sent:	Tuesday, April 03, 2001 10:34 AM
To:	Bradford, William S.
Cc:	Wilhite, Jane
Subject:	FW: Flying Crocodile

This counterparty's line of business is the distribution of pornography.  I asked Robbi Rossi her thoughts, and legal is OK with the deal because there is no illegality (as long as it does not involve child pornography).  Jane has the company's tax returns.  It is a 1 year on-net OC-12 from Seattle to San Jose plus local loop with an MRC of 22K per month.  This is a transaction which accoriding to our guidelines we would approve with no credit language in the GTCs due to size.  There is no income being marked on the deal.  I just wanted to be sure all parties are aware of what we are doing (Jim and Paul are aware per below message).  Clearly this is not credit risk; however, it seems plausible that there is the potential for this deal to reflect negatively on Enron if it were to become known in the market that we were selling our network capacity to  customers in this line of business.

Thanks,
Tanya

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Wilhite, Jane
Sent:	Tuesday, April 03, 2001 10:14 AM
To:	Rohauer, Tanya
Subject:	FW: Flying Crocodile

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Garrett, Bryan
Sent:	Tuesday, April 03, 2001 10:10 AM
To:	Wilhite, Jane
Cc:	Bowe, Mike; Abraham, John
Subject:	Flying Crocodile

Jane,

I asked Paul and Jim if there was a problem with doing a deal with Flying Crocodile, and the response was that we will deal with them so long as they contractually agree that they will not use the capacity for any unlawful purpose (which is a standard clause in our agreement).  Therefore, we will move ahead with this.  As I told you earlier, the mark on the long-haul is likely to be negative, and it is an on-net circuit so we can absorb it back if they default.  The local loop is off-net, so I would imagine that you will want some protection on that side.  Let me know if you need anything else from me.

Thanks,
BG

Bryan Garrett
Northwest/Canada Desk
Bandwidth Trading & Risk Management
Enron Broadband Services

Office - (713) 853-7993
Mobile - (713) 256-6668
Fax - (713) 646-8795


Folks:

Here is a rewrite of the power point presentation referenced in the previous
note.  Again, please keep confidential and do not distribute.  It's the copy
that Hertzberg used to present to his caucus.Thanks.

Best,
Jeff

P.S.  Our numbers show that noncore for Edison would be about 30% of load;
Hertzberg has it at about 20%.


FYI - See Ed's comments.  We helped ENA significantly in getting this "Favor"
from our friends at PSE&G and it is a good feeling to see that they
recognized it.
---------------------- Forwarded by Steve Montovano/NA/Enron on 04/24/2001
12:49 PM ---------------------------

Ed McMichael@ECT
04/24/2001 12:39 PM
To: Andrew Kelemen/Enron@EnronXGate, Amanda Colpean/Enron@EnronXGate
cc: Raymond Bowen/enron@enronxgate, Rodney Malcolm/Enron@EnronXGate, Steve
Montovano/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: FW: Garden State Paper

Attached please find the long awaited, much anticipated Garden State
Paper/Public Service Electric & Gas amendment which will do the following for
GSP:
1)  Secure TETCO M3 receipt through 10/31/2007
2)  Secure the current discounted LDC transportation rate through 10/31/07
I have reviewed the document and it seems in good order.  This agreement does
hedge GSP against increases in the base transportation rate on the LDC and
insures that GSP will have TETCO M3 (as opposed to the currently higher
Transco Z6 NY) as its receipt point, but it does NOT hedge GSP's M3 basis
exposure.  That exposure can be hedged through ENA or other wholesale gas
trading companies.

Please review it and execute two (2) copies soon as possible.  Thereafter,
please mail them to the attention of:
Mr. David W. Wohlfarth
Public Service Electric and Gas Company
80 Park Plaza
Newark, New Jersey  07101
(phone) 973-430-5674

Credit for securing this amendment should go to Steve Montovano, VP Gov/Reg
Affairs.  He was very instrumental in getting PSEG to give GSP this amendment.

If you have any questions, please ask.
Regards,
Ed

---------------------- Forwarded by Ed McMichael/HOU/ECT on 04/24/2001 12:06
PM ---------------------------

"Wohlfarth, David W." <David.Wohlfarth@pseg.com> on 04/23/2001 12:50:59 PM
To: "'ed.mcmichael@enron.com'" <ed.mcmichael@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: FW: Garden State Paper

Ed:  This is the draft that went to Ken Carretta.  I don't expect any
changes to it.  I will send down a copy to be signed by someone from Garden
State, or Enron, I guess, acting as agent.

>  -----Original Message-----
> From:  Caffery, David F.
> Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 11:31 AM
> To: Wohlfarth, David W.; Carretta, Kenneth R.
> Subject: FW: Garden State Paper
>
> Let's try that again with the file......
>
>
>  <<gardenstateamend.doc>>
>
>
>
>  -----Original Message-----
> From:  Caffery, David F.
> Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 11:29 AM
> To: Wohlfarth, David W.; Carretta, Kenneth R.
> Subject: Garden State Paper
>
> Attached is the second draft of the amendment to the GSP TSG-NF discounted
> transportation agreement.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Dave

 - gardenstateamend.doc


Hollis -

Per the phone conversation earlier today, below is a chart exhibiting the
differences between the Monthly Operational Report (Mark Fisher) and the
Weekly MTD (John Ruiz) numbers posted on the web.  Both cases should include
the numbers through the end of the month.  From what we discussed, my
understanding is that the chart should pool from the same source.  Please let
me know if I am viewing this information incorrectly.

Thanks,
Ilan


FYI.  Appears that the two sides may be crawling toward renegotiation.

Best,
Jeff

Battle lines drawn over long-term power deals
SD Union Tribune, 10.07.01
In a perverse sign that normalcy is returning, the state's power crisis roared back to life last week with the California Public Utilities Commission as the focus.
This time the state utilities commission pulled off a feat few could have anticipated, even from a long-running crisis that has caused blackouts and soaring electricity costs.
In a span of three hours last week, the five-member panel went from being applauded by consumer groups and blasted by industry interests to being vilified by consumer advocates and applauded by business.
Consumer advocates celebrated when the PUC refused to rubber stamp state-negotiated long-term power contracts, a move the governor said stalled the $12.5 billion bond offering needed to cover past power purchases.
But business leaders and the governor cheered the PUC for approving a $3.3 billion rescue of Southern California Edison, which consumer advocates criticized as an unauthorized bailout.
As massive as the Edison deal is, it may be less likely to affect customers of SDG&E than the second reality that emerged last week: Despite the PUC action on the contracts, Californians still face the burden of paying more than $40 billion over the next two decades for overpriced and possibly unneeded electricity.
Or maybe not.
While electricity providers continue to defend the long-term power contracts as fair and key to resolving the state's electricity crisis, consumer groups and others have launched a major offensive to get the contracts revised, renegotiated or canceled.
Critics argue that the deals were negotiated while the state's economy was reeling, blackouts were striking and federal regulators were insisting that the state had to tie up the bulk of its electricity needs through long-term deals.
Duress alleged
Consumer advocates say the long-term contracts bind California to power purchases at more than double current market prices and force the state to buy power it does not need.
"We should not be stuck with these agreements because conditions have changed so dramatically," said Bill Ahern, a senior analyst with Consumers Union, the publisher of Consumer Reports magazine. "We did these agreements under duress, and it is better for the generators and us to negotiate what all believe is a good deal."
Ahern also said an investigation of possible conflicts of interest for at least one member of the state team that negotiated the contracts could lead to their invalidation.
Michael Shames, executive director of the Utility Consumers' Action Network in San Diego, notes that much of the power to be delivered under the agreements will come from new plants yet to be built in California.
"The state has the ability through the siting process to modify those contracts," Shames said. The motivation to do so could grow soon, he added.
"Especially in an election year, the question will be whether elected officials and the public will tolerate the (cost) of these contracts," Shames said.
Shames noted that the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission pressed California to lock up much of its power under long-term contracts, because it argued that excessive reliance on short-term purchases was a major contributor to the power crisis.
Now it appears the cost of that solution could exceed the cost of the short-term crisis, Shames said.
Beyond the growing political pressure, San Diego attorney Michael Aguirre is arguing in appellate court that Gov. Gray Davis overstepped his legal authority by declaring an emergency and signing the long-term agreements in the first place.
He says California's electricity deals violate state law regarding purchasing practices.
"To circumvent that law by calling it an emergency does not pass legal muster," said Aguirre, who is suing electricity providers for overcharging. "There were other means to manage the emergency."
The PUC also says the state locked itself into too much power for too long a period.
"First and foremost, we should try to renegotiate, try to get shorter terms," said Gary Cohen, general counsel for the PUC.
Willingness to deal
At least two major suppliers have indicated a willingness to discuss the matter, Cohen said. The PUC also will continue to press for changes to the agreements with FERC.
The federal commission regulates wholesale power markets and is legally mandated to ensure prices are "just and reasonable." FERC is considering refunds for prices paid by California in spot power markets during the crisis.
Cohen argues that if spot prices are subject to refunds, long-term contracts should be subject to similar relief. The PUC has made several filings pressing this point, but has received no response from FERC.
For his part, the governor declines to call for renegotiation of the contracts.
"In order to renegotiate we would have to have the generator come to us, and they have not done so," said Steve Maviglio, the governor's spokesman. "We would be pleased to sit down and renegotiate. But we have not been approached by anyone."
Some experts believe Davis wants to break the contracts more than he is willing to say, but he must maintain credibility with the providers with whom he signed agreements. The same people speculate that the governor, who blasted the PUC last week for failing to help implement the agreements, may have privately welcomed the commission's action as a step toward revising the agreements.
Power providers, meanwhile, continue to support the agreements.
"The contracts are good for the state and helped stabilize the market," said William Highlander, director of public relations for Calpine Corp.
The San Jose company is the largest provider under the controversial agreements, with some $13 billion in contracts. Calpine hopes to provide much of that power from new plants it is building within California.
Sempra says contract fair
The company has not been approached by the state to revise its agreements, said Highlander, and he declined to say how Calpine would respond to such an overture.
San Diego-based Sempra Energy, another major provider under the agreements, also insists its contracts provide power at fair rates to the state.
Michael Niggli, president of Sempra Energy Resources, said his company will provide power for about 4 to 5 cents per kilowatt hour, based upon current natural gas prices.
"It's pretty tough to say, 'Let's renegotiate the lowest price contract,' " Niggli said.
But V. John White, director of the Center for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Technologies, said Sempra's contract and others lock the state into power that consumers are unlikely to need, and too much of the electricity comes from non-renewable sources.
White says state consumers are being held hostage by some unnecessary posturing.
"There are indications from several generators that a call to renegotiate would be responded to," White said. "The generators say nobody asked us. The governor says nobody has volunteered.
"But the opportunity is there at this moment to renegotiate. Why don't we ask?"
*****************************************************************
State authority buying more power for 2002
Critics say it's too costly, perhaps unnecessary and may be sold off later at a loss
OC Register, 10.07.01
SACRAMENTO -- California's new power agency is rushing to buy more electricity for next summer, even as the state has come under fire for buying too much costly power and then having to sell it at bargain prices.
Moreover, another state agency says the state will have enough power - because of existing contracts and conservation - to get through the hottest of summers next year.
The new power purchases, which are being negotiated by the California Public Power and Financing Authority, could add as much as 3,000 megawatts of power to California - enough for about 2.3 million homes - by June. That would be in addition to the existing $43 billion in long-term agreements the state has already inked with power generators.
Many observers - even those supportive of the power authority's goal to increase cleaner, alternative energy sources in the state - are balking at the agency's rapid pace, saying consumers will end up paying more in the long run.
"We're dumping power and (authority Chairman) David Freeman is buying more power. What's up with that? It's absolutely ludicrous,'' said Harry Snyder, executive director of Consumers' Union, which publishes Consumer Reports.
A draft report by the California Energy Commission shows the state already has plenty of power for next year.
Without the extra power being negotiated by the power authority, even in a very hot summer, the state would have about 6,000 extra megawatts during peak periods, when it needs 63,800 megawatts, about a 9 percent cushion. That is if all power plants came online as expected and residents continued to conserve as they are.
In a normal summer, such as this year's, the state would have 10,000 extra megawatts above the average 59,000 megawatts it needs, roughly a 17 percent surplus.
Power authority officials counter that those surplus figures are estimates that depend on people conserving at the rate they did this summer. "The more we own of our own supply, the more we can control the market,'' said state Treasurer Phil Angelides, an authority board member.
Said Freeman: "We are thinking our way through what we should do for next summer. That why we get paid the big bucks."
New contracts would increase 'green' power
In addition, at least one-third of the new energy the power authority is trying to buy - 1,000 megawatts - would come from solar, wind and other renewable energy providers, officials said.
Such generators were left out when the state signed its initial round of contracts. Bringing on 1,000 more megawatts would increase the portion of the state's energy derived from renewable resources to 13 percent. The long-term goal is 17 percent.
The remaining power purchased under the new contracts, perhaps 2,000 megawatts, would be from so-called "peaker'' plants - less efficient jet-engine-like generators that are turned on only during emergency shortages.
The emphasis on these natural gas plants irks many environmentalists, but proponents of them say these would be a new generation of gas peakers. While not preferable to conventional generating plants, they would pollute less than the peakers currently being pressed into service. If California can build new, more efficient ones, it can retire the old polluting ones, the argument goes.
Nonetheless, critics fear the state, rushing into new negotiations, will leave ratepayers with more expensive power contracts. They note that the authority hasn't completed an assessment on exactly how much power it really needs and what it wants for the state's power portfolio. That assessment won't be done until February.
"I hope they have a basis on which they've determined they need those (3,000) megawatts of contracts,'' said Lenny Goldberg, a lobbyist for The Utility Reform Network, a consumer watchdog group.
Businesses worry new pacts will hurt them
Even the state's businesses are critical.
They believe that the more expensive long-term power there is under state contract, the less likely lawmakers are to businesses go into the open market to buy the cheaper electricity they think they can get there.
Lawmakers, they believe, will want to force businesses to continue to buy power under the contracts they've negotiated because if the businesses were allowed to pull out, residential customers alone would be left paying the higher prices that those contracts dictate.
Lawmakers are reluctant to put any more burdens on the average consumer, who they feel are the unintended victims of a severely flawed deregulation system.
"I would just as soon not see them negotiate any more contracts,'' said Jack Stewart, president of the California Manufacturers and Technology Association.
The state power authority was signed into law in May to build its own plants, help others finance them and compete with the private power companies. Leading the $5 million-a-year agency is Freeman, the former head of the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power and one of Davis' closest advisers during the energy crisis.
The Legislature's auditors are casting a critical eye at the power authority and will hold hearings next month.
"It's not an investigation,'' said Assemblyman Fred Keeley, D-Felton, chairman of the Joint Legislative Audit Committee. But "it's appropriate early and often to review their work in a public venue and have them held accountable for compliance of the law.''
Keeley's committee is looking into the planned purchases and he said he could not yet conclude whether the power authority's actions could help or hurt the state.
Freeman said onlookers have been too quick to criticize the state's work.
"The plain truth is we had blackouts last winter. We did what we could. We kept the rates stable and lights on,'' Freeman said. "Criticism is real easy with the benefit of 20/20 hindsight.''


FYI--

Kinder Morgan will be injecting 30.0/day into Bammel storage during April.

Thanks,
Mark
x33396


Can you come down to my desk around 1:00?

D

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Megan Parker @ ENRON                           03/09/2001 01:02 PM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Tenaska

Do you have any time this afternoon or Monday to look at the Tenaska
spreadsheet?  I am trying to close out Jan 2001 and I have some questions.

Megan


---------------------- Forwarded by Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT on 12/08/2000 03:19 PM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kam Keiser                           12/08/2000 10:38 AM

To: Victor Guggenheim/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, Souad
Mahmassani/Corp/Enron@ENRON, B Scott Palmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andres
Balmaceda/NA/Enron@ENRON, Bruce Mills/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: gd mappings

There is a file that may be useful to you guys.  It will show you all first
of month curves, what gas daily curve they are mapped to and the volatility
curve mapping.

If you ever have a question about your gas daily swaps and what curves to use
take a look at this.

O:/erms/erms_adm/Financial Books (The Family)/Excel Reports/Gas_Daily Mapping
Table.xls


Mary,

I have broken out June and July like you asked from Annette's reporting and
the numbers are below.

Month          Total Consumption
June           429950
July           213384

Thank you,
Michael
---------------------- Forwarded by Michael J McClellan/TMG/CSC on
09/14/2001 10:25 AM ---------------------------

Michael J McClellan/CEG/CSC on 09/12/2001 01:42:38 PM

Sent by:  Michael J McClellan/TMG/CSC

To:   "Ring, Richard" <Richard.Ring@ENRON.com>
cc:

Subject:  RE: Clean Choice Reports and Fetzer report for July  (Document
      link: Michael J McClellan)

The total consumption for July was 642934.

Thanks,
Michael

"Ring, Richard" <Richard.Ring@ENRON.com> on 09/12/2001 10:29:17 AM

To:   Michael J McClellan/TMG/CSC@CSC
cc:

Subject:  RE: Clean Choice Reports and Fetzer report for July

Michael,

Are you going to resubmit the report(s) with the correct July 2001
information?  The specific information that I am looking for is accurate
information for "Reportable Consumption" and "Total Consumption", both
in kWh's.

Thanks for your assistance.

Regards,
Richard

-----Original Message-----
From: mmcclel4@csc.com [mailto:mmcclel4@csc.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 8:57 AM
To: rring@enron.com
Subject: Re: Clean Choice Reports and Fetzer report for July

Richard,

Afer checking the last report was for two months June and July.  The
4,407
was not kWh but is Dollars instead.  Sorry for the confusion.

Regards,
Michael

rring@enron.com on 08/17/2001 02:25:33 PM

To:   Michael J McClellan/TMG/CSC@CSC
cc:

Subject:  Re: Clean Choice Reports and Fetzer report for July

Michael,

It looks like there may be some problem with the Fetzer Vineyards
Greenpower Consumption Report.  You may want to review the report and
determine what is wrong.  Reportable Consumption is 352,536 kWh's and
Total
Consumption is 4,407 kWh's.  Total Consumption should be more than
Reportable Consumption.

Also there is no consumption for the month of June 2001.

I can be reached at 713.853.3561.

Regards,

Richard

mmcclel4@csc.com@csc.com on 08/15/2001 04:30:28 PM

To:   eespower@enron.com, richard.ring@enron.com, mhannusc@enron.com
cc:
Subject:  Clean Choice Reports and Fetzer report for July

Attached please find the monthly reports for July.  I will be taking
over
processing the report for Annette Tafallo.  If you have any questions
please do not hesitate to call.

(See attached file: Residential2001.xls)(See attached file:
SMALLC&I2001.xls)(See attached file: FETZERCAPS2001.xls)

Thank you,
Michael
713-632-8711
(See attached file: Residential2001.xls)
(See attached file: SMALLC&I2001.xls)
(See attached file: FETZERCAPS2001.xls)

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure
by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and
delete
all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are
not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence
a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not
be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************

(Embedded image moved to file: pic07441.pcx) - Residential2001.xls
(See attached file: SMALLC&I2001.xls)
(See attached file: FETZERCAPS2001.xls)


Hi Matt,

ENA is selling some of the LM6000's to ESA.  Will you be the ENA Tax Man on
the deal?

Thanks,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 08/28/2000 10:58
AM ---------------------------

Kevin Joyce
08/25/2000 09:51 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Roseann Engeldorf/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lisa Bills/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Brett R
Wiggs/SA/Enron@Enron, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, John R Ayres/NA/Enron@Enron,
Kent Castleman/NA/Enron@Enron, Mary Cilia/NA/Enron@Enron, Mike
Morrison/NA/Enron@Enron, Chris Booth/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Electrobolt S&S Scope

Kay,
 Attached is the LM 6000 and options scope that ESA has prepared, that will
be input to our MOU.  It does not reflect the scope of equipment that will be
procured from ABB yet; this should be forthcoming.  Also below is the current
cost estimate of the machines with their S&S options and the ABB scope.
Please let us know what other information regarding scope that you might
need.

Thanks,
Kevin
---------------------- Forwarded by Kevin Joyce/Corp/Enron on 08/25/2000
09:26 AM ---------------------------
From: John R Ayres on 08/24/2000 01:35 PM
To: Chris Booth/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Brett R Wiggs/SA/Enron@Enron, Kevin Joyce/Corp/Enron@Enron, Glauco
Palhoto/SA/Enron@Enron, Gerald L Gobbi/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Total Electrobolt S&S Scope

Chris, attached is the total scope to S&S.  From this list you should be able
to make your change order to S&S base on purchased quantities versus required
quantities.  I have provided you the required quantities.
I provided you a column for the delta cost to S&S.  When you are finished,
please complete the spreadsheet for all of our records.  I do not know how we
are to add cost for storage either.
Thanks,
John

From: John R Ayres on 08/23/2000 12:38 PM
To: Kevin Joyce/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Brett R Wiggs/SA/Enron@Enron

Subject: S&S (GE) Scope of Supply Cost

Here are the total cost for the S&S scope of supply for the Electrobolt
Project.  I have not included any ENA burdens or storage cost.  These cost
are from purchase order with ENA to S&S.

     EIGHT MACHINES               EACH
The total cost of the LM 6000's, sprint package, water injection
skid                = $112,855,600  or $14,106,950 each
The total cost of options (chillers stacks, cooling tower, mod. buildings,
etc. =     13,309,400  or      1,663,675 each

                                               Totals                = $
126,165,000 or   $15,770,625 each

The transformers from ABB in Brazil should cost $3,200,000. total in Brazil
without shipping to the site.

Hope this helps you with the WLB bucket.
John


These have been sold.


EPMI recently did a deal with the City of Vernon which was a little bit funky
and the sensitive, high strung city got somewhat out of sorts about the way
we insisted upon documenting the deal and bitched to our trader (Rosman)
about it, who, in turn, having a bad karma day, as usual, came in and bitched
to me about it.  After some hearty belly-laughing at his expense flowing from
the rich comedic theme of how we talk so sweet to our customers on the phone
and then hang up and curse their mortal souls with expletives deleted,    I
agreed with him that we need to ask the following question to those above
with more wisdom than we have:

When you do the physical leg of an EFP transaction,  must the delivery point
for the physical piece be identical to the delivery point of the futures
piece?

Shooting from the hip on the Casino floor without much substantive
explanation to go on, I said the answer to this question was absolutely yes
and the City of Vernon huffed and puffed and said they had done other deals
where the delivery points were different.

I made us document the deal as follows:

1. An undocumented Nymex transaction whereby our broker agreed with their
broker that we would buy 30 Palo Verde futures contracts from Vernon for $120.

2. Then, the Exchange of this futures position for a physical position was
documented as a physical trade whereby EPMI sold Vernon 30 MW at Palo Verde
for $120.

3. Then, because Vernon wanted to get out of their Palo Verde position, we
agreed to buy back the 30 Mw for $120 and this was documented as a phsical
transaction.

4.  Then, because Vernon needed the power at NP-15, we sold them 30 MW at
NP-15 for $116. (Don't get distracted by thinking about buying at $120 and
selling at $116 and losing money. The prices were good at both points as part
of our portfolio of deals.)

Vernon said we should have done step 1 and step 4 and not 2 and 3 and that
they do this all the time.  I basically said that if the delivery point in
the NYMEX contract was PV that it had to be the same in the physical part of
the EFP.   May we please have the benefit of any comments on this issue.
Thank you kindly.----cgy


BH,

Sorry I didn't get these to you last night.  I left the office sooner than
planned.  This list is pretty slim.  I spent much time trying to learn to
trade Waha, which took a considerable amount of time away from producing
reults for you.  With me now concentrating on operations and with the plan to
hire an additional person, this will change.  Let me know if you have any
questions on my list of accomplishments.

D


Kate,
Thanks for the update.  The changes you have made to deals 566424.1 and
566426.1 are not reflected on the carp report - maybe these need to be
auto-scheduled??  As for 576512.1 I've added the hours in question to the
spreadsheet.  If you need more clarification, please give me a call.

Thanks
Brooklyn
713.853.1909


Daren,

FYI.

Bob

---------------------- Forwarded by Robert Cotten/HOU/ECT on 11/30/2000 06:20
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Melissa Graves                           11/30/2000 04:40 PM

To: Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Donald P Reinhardt/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vance L
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael Walters/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey Austin/HOU/EES@EES,
Robert Cotten/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cynthia Hakemack/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Tri-C/Cokinos Gov Bill Daniels Dec. Pricing

Julie,

Please correct the pricing for Sitara Ticket #377169 for the month of Dec.
from 97% IF/HSC to 97% Gas Daily, per Jeff's message below.

Thank you,
Melissa
---------------------- Forwarded by Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT on 11/30/2000
04:39 PM ---------------------------

Jeff A Austin@EES
11/28/2000 02:38 PM
To: Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jill T Zivley/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Tri-C/Cokinos Gov Bill Daniels Dec. Pricing

Melissa,

Cokinos has elected to be paid Gas Daily for the month of December.  Please
let Jill know if there are any questions.

Thanks,

Jeff


got here around 9, hopefully leaving at 11.  I only did 8 abs last night.
I'm going to get to 20 though....How was the play?  Haven't be to Zula....

Alexandra Saler@EES
12/15/2000 08:22 AM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re:

it doesn't look that different.  it is just fun to do!  I hope that you were
comfy and cozy sleeping late this morning.  I dragged, I mean dragged myself
out of bed this morning and got on the treadmill.  Only for 35 minutes though
b/c I was so tired.  call me later.  have you been to Zula yet?  I am going
tonight and I wanted to know if it is good.

To: Alexandra Saler/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Re:

I'm out of here at 4.  Good luck with the new hair--i'll talk to you later....

Alexandra Saler@EES
12/14/2000 02:57 PM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re:

we would have so much fun we wouldn't have to leave early!!!

To: Alexandra Saler/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Re:

I'll have Jennifer put in the move order to get your desk into my office.

Alexandra Saler@EES
12/14/2000 02:26 PM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re:

you are as much of a slacker as me!!! want me to come entertain you for a
while?

To: Alexandra Saler/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Re:

I've got a meeting at 3:30 (for an hour at most) then I'm leaving for the
day!  tomorrow, in about 10, out at noon.  I can't wait.

Alexandra Saler@EES
12/14/2000 01:49 PM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re:

I am in vacation mode.  I don't want to do anything.  what are you doing?

To: Alexandra Saler/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Re:

What's up?

Alexandra Saler@EES
12/14/2000 08:18 AM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re:

what??????????

To: Alexandra Saler/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Re:

oh.................my...............god..............


As we discussed, Mary, we are about ready to send our edits back to Sierra
Pacific for the Las Vegas Cogen II Interconnect Agreement. We need to keep
the process moving forward as quickly as possible. To facilitate that, a
meeting next week (I presume in Reno) to work through the Agreement would be
desirable. The objective would be to work through open issues, resolve all
that can be resolved easily, and identify the few (if any) issues that we
each may need to do more work on. We should target the week of April 2nd to
have the document complete.

After we get the revision back from LeBoeuf tomorrow, it would be good if you
requested a meeting date for next week when you forward it. Sometime in the
first half of the week would be preferable.

Thanks, Mary.


Notice No:  01-88
March 8, 2001

NYMEX BOARD EXTENDS PROPRIETARY FEE REDUCTION PROGRAM

At its meeting on March 7, 2001, the NYMEX Board of Directors determined to
extend the current Proprietary Fee Reduction Program (&Program8) through
April 30, 2001.

Pursuant to the Program, Member Firms and individuals members who own seats
will have their NYMEX Division fees reduced by 12 cents per round turn (6
cents per trade side).

Individual members who lease their seats, or hold a membership under an ABC
Agreement, will have their NYMEX Division fees reduced by 2.5 cents per round
turn (or 1 ? cents per trade side).

Clearing Members who clear Member Firm trades should adjust their billing
systems accordingly.

Clearing Members clearing floor members, accounts should not adjust their
billing systems for such individual members.  NYMEX issues payments directly
to individual members based upon their trading activity.

Floor members who execute Type 3 trades are asked to pay special attention to
NYMEX Rule 6.18 (B) (ii), requiring the executing member to report the alpha
code (badge symbol) of the receiving member on PTS.

Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to
contact M. Dawn Lowe or Donna Talamo at (212) 299-2370.

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=sara.shackleton@enron.com&
refdoc=(01-88)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


Sara, I am on hold on a conference call but wanted to talk with you about
some questions/issues re: the assignment agreement.  (My questions are not
holding us up since Anna is proceeding to try to get a final draft as we know
it executed).  But for my own understanding:

1. Is ENA assigning to Enron Credit Inc. any agreements other than the
Securities Loan Agreement?  If so, let me know.  If not, then would we need
an assignment agreement as opposed to just having Enron Credit Inc. sign a
Securities Loan Agreement?

Cheryl Nelson
Senior Counsel
EB3816
(713) 345-4693


REMINDER:  The  NNG/TW 4th Qtr. Forecast Review w/Officers is scheduled for
Friday, Dec 8th at 1:30 - 2:30 PM.  The meeting will take place in Conf. Room
49C2/Houston and Conf. Room 717/Omaha.

If you have any questions please call me at x31437.  Thanks!


Well actually no but I have been hanging out a lot with someone that I really
really like a lot.  And well, I haven't neccisarily been going without just
not in the past few weeks.


Indian State to Review Power Agreement With Enron Unit, AP Says
11/26/0 19:12 (New York)

     Houston, Nov. 26 (Bloomberg) -- The western Indian state of
Maharashtra will review its power agreement with Enron Corp.'s
Indian subsidiary after the price of electricity has almost
quadrupled, Associated Press reported.
     The second phase of an agreement with Dhabol Power Co., the
Indian unit of the Houston-based natural-gas and electricity
company, will be reviewed, AP reported, citing Maharashtra's chief
minister, Vilasrao Deshmukh.
     Enron was one of the first big foreign companies to enter
India after the Indian government opened up the economy to foreign
investors in 1991.

(AP 11/26)


$933  to Dean Witter


This week I am picking San Diego to lose to the Rams.


That does not qualify as something interesting.  You need to try harder.


This message is intended for all U.S. employees eligible for Enron's domestic
medical plans.  If you receive this notification in error, please disregard.


This is a notice to inform you that the server where your Outlook mailbox resides is scheduled for an outage tonight.  Your mailbox will be temporarily unavailable starting anytime after 11pm and may continue to be unavailable until 1 a.m., when all server maintenance work have been completed.  Outlook Web Access (OWA) will also be unavailable during this time.

Blackberry users:  Message delivery may be delayed for a few minutes.

If you have any questions, please call the Resolution Center at x31411.


Phyllis:
Here is where I understand we are with the LOC provisions and the LC for.

1. No changes will be made to the LOC provisions.

2. In the form of LOC, i will delete the language in drawing condition 1 "the
entire undrawn amount of the LOC" and put in "$___________."  I will alos
delete the automatic renewal language in the third paragraph such that it
will read "This LOC shall expire _____ days from the date of issuance."

Are we ready to finalize?  If so, I will e-mail to you final forms of the
docs.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 05/25/2001 11:06 AM -----

	Edward Sacks/ENRON@enronXgate
	05/25/2001 08:50 AM

		 To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: Select Energy EEI and ISDA LOC Formats

Carol - I have reviewed the changes in both forms attached.  In the LOC, I
think that they are getting at the point to allow for partial drawings and
requesting to reduce the auto renewal notice clause to 30 days from 90 days.
Seems okay to me.  The proposed changes in the Letter of Credit Provisions,
please ignore.  I have discussed this with them and they have come off it.

Ed Sacks

 -----Original Message-----
From:  moonevw@selectenergy.com@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-moonevw+40selectenergy+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 8:36 AM
To: Sacks, Edward
Cc: morisjr@selectenergy.com; lemelpe@NU.COM
Subject: Select Energy EEI and ISDA LOC Formats

Ed-

We received an email from your attorney about the LOC format for the two
contracts.  Our legal counsel has reviewed the format and the provisions
for the LOC and we have two proposed changes to the LOC format and one
proposed change to the Letter of Credit Provisions.  Please call me to
discuss these issues.

(See attached file: Enron LOC language EEI 052501.doc)

(See attached file: Enron ISDA LOC Format 052501.doc)

We would like to keep this process moving forward and finalize the
contracts.

Thanks for your assistance.

Regards-

Valerie Mooney
 - Enron LOC language EEI 052501.doc
 - Enron ISDA LOC Format 052501.doc


For January 2000 for a couple of weekends SJersey tried to do intradays.  Due
to the interconnect and other supply we were not able to change their
nominations.  South Jersey have always been told that changing nomination on
the weekend would be on best available.  Julie Punches from Sjersey due to
her changes on the weekend is over at some of her CDC markets is asking to
allocate the excess gas to CES agg pools.
Would this be something Enron would do???


For those newcomers (and a reminder to the old timers),  there is a
departmental scanner is in cubicle no EB3884 which is adjacent from my
cubicle.  It has a good OCR progam, OmniPage Pro 10, for text scanning.
Please feel free to utilize the equipment and if you need assistance  feel
free to contact me--I'm right next door.

Best regards,
Taffy Milligan  X57373


All,

Please mark you calendars, you  have been selected to participate in the  ENA Trading Track recruiting event Monday, October 29th , 3 pm - 7 pm.     If you are unable to interview on this date please advise.

A selection of you will telephone screen 18 external candidates, and decide whether or not they should proceed to the final round on the above date.    A separate e:mail will be sent in relation to this.

Any questions let me know.

Regards,

Karen
x54667


Bandwidth now OK per Marie.  She should have GTC to you no later than noon
tomorrow.

	Lisa Lees
	11/07/2000 03:08 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Stacey Richardson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: US Bandwidth STM-1

Tana/Karen:

The product long description below will fall under the new product type US
Bandwidth STM-1.  Credit (Tom Moran) has approved copying the profiles for
the new product type from the following:

US Bandwidth DS3 Phy Fwd

Please respond by 10 a.m. on Wednesday, November 8.

Thank you.

---------------------- Forwarded by Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT on 11/07/2000 01:58 PM
---------------------------

Robert B Cass
10/31/2000 05:38 PM
To: Matthew Adams/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Jay Hawthorn/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Richard
Schneider/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Blumenthal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen H
Douglas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bjorn Hagelmann/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rudi Zipter/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer deBoisblanc Denny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Torrey
Moorer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tara Sweitzer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dawn C Kenne/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Friedman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melba
Lozano/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: US Bandwidth STM-1

Hi Matt-

SIGMA FACTOR REQUEST:
Commercial has requested the following new Bandwidth product on EOL.  The
product type is similar to a the other Bandwidth products currently listed on
EnronOnline.

New Product TypeCommodity:
Product Type:   US Bandwidth STM-1 Phy Fwd
Commodity: Bandwidth
Currency:     USD
Default UOM:   DSO miles
Country:   USA

Product: STM-1
Market Pooling Point Locations: New York to London (NY-LON)
DS0s: 2016
Miles: 3471

Physical Description :
A US Bandwidth Transaction with Enron Broadband Services, L.P. ("EBS")
pursuant to which the Seller shall sell and the Buyer shall buy the quantity
of Bandwidth Units submitted by Counterparty via the Website. The number of
DSO's per STM-1 is 2016. The price shall be as submitted by the Counterparty
via the Website. Any party entering into a Transaction to buy or sell
Bandwidth Units from or to EBS shall be responsible for connecting to the
Demarcation Point located at each Market Pooling Point in order to take
physical delivery of such Bandwidth.  In order to achieve such connectivity,
a party may incur costs and expenses and may additionally be required to
execute certain documentation.
The Term of the Transaction shall begin at 12:00 a.m. (EST) on the Effective
Date and continue to 11:59: 59 p.m. (EST) on the Termination Date. The
Effective Date is 01 Nov 2000 and the Termination Date is 30 Apr 2001.
The Transaction shall be for Bandwidth between the New York Market Pooling
Point (111 8th Avenue, Suite 1517, New York, NY 10011, NPA-NXX: 212-462,
CLLI: NYCMNY83H62) and the London Market Pooling Point (Telecity 2, 8-9
Harbour Exchange, 1st Floor, Room 1T, London, E14 9GE),  for a total of 3,471
DSO miles.
The price is quoted in US Dollars per unit of volume, which will be the
Contractual Currency.
The unit of measure against which the Unit Price is quoted is one DSO mile
per month and the quantity shown shall be in number of Bandwidth Units per
month. Therefore, the Contract Price will be calculated as follows: Price x
the  number of DSO's per Bandwidth Unit x the number of DSO miles x the
number of Bandwidth Units.


Deb
There is a FEb 2001 bill from Cadwalader in the amount of $20,415.76

Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com

	Deb Korkmas
	04/18/2001 05:24 PM

		 To: Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peter del Vecchio/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan
Lyons/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lou Stoler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julia Murray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Justin
Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT, Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ian Brungs/EU/Enron@Enron,
Janet Wood/EU/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Outside Legal Bills

For Houston attorneys only:  In an effort to forecast our legal expenses,
accounting has asked for an estimate of our outside legal expenses.  Please
send me the total dollar amount of the legal invoices that you have received
but haven't yet processed to be paid.  Also, if you have knowledge of charges
but have not yet received an invoice, please try and give me an estimate of
what those charges might be as well.  I need to have your estimates by NOON
tomorrow, Thursday, April 19.   Call me if you have any questions.

Deb Korkmas
EWS Legal Dept.
1400 Smith Street, Room 3834A
Houston, TX  77002
Phone:  713-853-5448
Fax:  713-646-3393


OK.  Mary Cook just asked me to email her a copy of the Gas deal (VC0975.1),
FYI.

From: Sara Shackleton@ECT on 05/31/2001 09:04 AM
To: Diane Anderson/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: KCS

We're waiting for Teresa Bushman

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	Diane Anderson@ENRON
	05/31/2001 08:53 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: KCS

The revised redline is OK with Fred Lagrasta per Derek Bailey


Great job!   Mark

	Bruce Lundstrom@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	04/06/2001 11:24 AM

		 To: Mark E Haedicke@ECT, Rob Walls/ENRON@enronXgate
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: Hainan

Mark/Rob -

Good news is hard to come by these days in the Enron emerging market world so
I thought that I would pass this along.

We still need to work on repatriation/conversion issues to get our money out
but at least it sits safely in an Enron account in the meantime.

Bill Krenz worked very hard on this matter under trying circumstances.  The
head of the HEPCO negotiating team through a cup at our business guy, Don
Bunnell, and shattered a tea pot.  Shards from the pot hit Don in the face
and he had to be hospitalized.  He is apparently fine now.

Bruce

---------------------- Forwarded by Bruce Lundstrom/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
04/06/2001 11:19 AM ---------------------------

William Krenz
04/06/2001 10:05 AM
To: Christopher B Hunt/ENRON@enronXgate @ ENRON
cc: Christopher B Hunt/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON, Bruce
Lundstrom/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: RE: Hainan

No bank gty was necessary afterall.  Although it's a bit complicated, Hepco
initiated what amounted to 8 separate wires today, 6 of which hit today, and
two of which will hit Monday (we have chopped confirmation from the relevant
banks that the last two wires were initiated, but it was too late in the
business day to get the funds today).  At day's end RMB 271 million of RMB
341million hit today.  We'll follow up Monday for the rest, but dont
anticipate any problem.
Bill

From: Christopher B Hunt/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/06/2001 08:27 AM
To: William Krenz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Christopher B
Hunt/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON, Bruce
Lundstrom/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: RE: Hainan

Congratulations!; You guys deserve a lot of credit.
;
What happened with the last 1/12th of the money they were having a hard time
getting ready in time?
;
Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: Krenz, William
Sent: Fri 4/6/2001 12:52 AM
To: Christopher B Hunt/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON; Lundstrom, Bruce; James A
Hughes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON
Cc:
Subject: Hainan

Believe it or not, we closed with Hepco this morning.

Bill


Rebecca,,

Attached, for your information, is  a copy of a general presentation that I
prepared to illustrate and describe EGM's businesses.  This is a presentation
that will become a "living" document to communicate our businesses and
growth.  I will be making numerous changes as we move closer to the analyst
meeting in January but I wanted to give everyone a copy of this version.

Please don't hesitate to call me if you have any questions or comments.

Mike


Rhonda:
I will e-mail you comments to their form of assignment.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com

	Rhonda L Denton
	06/05/2001 09:23 AM

		 To: Genia FitzGerald/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward Sacks/Enron@EnronXGate, Wendy
Conwell/Enron@EnronXGate
		 Subject: Re: FW: From MEGA; Consent to Assignment....

I received a voice mail from Kristina Drew this morning indicating they
received FERC approval of this assignment on 5/31/01.  Are we working on an
amendment of the contract for Wendy per her email?  When we are ready,
Kristina indicated that we should print 3 originals of the assignment and
change the date on it if we have no other changes.  Please let me know status
so I can email her.  Thanks.

From: Genia FitzGerald on 05/18/2001 09:15 AM
To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Rhonda L Denton/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: FW: From MEGA; Consent to Assignment....

FYI
-----
From: Edward Sacks/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/18/2001 07:13 AM
To: Wendy Conwell/ENRON@enronXgate, Rhonda L Denton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: From MEGA; Consent to Assignment....

Wendy will be the lead on this and I will assist her.

Ed

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Denton, Rhonda
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 3:05 PM
To: Sacks, Edward; Conwell, Wendy; Radous, Paul; Ngo, Tracy; Gonzalez,
Veronica
Cc: FitzGerald, Genia
Subject: From MEGA; Consent to Assignment....

Please assign to a credit analyst for review.
---------------------- Forwarded by Rhonda L Denton/HOU/ECT on 05/14/2001
03:03 PM ---------------------------

"Drew, Kristina" <DrewK@merchantenergy.com> on 05/14/2001 03:00:25 PM
To: "'rhonda.l.denton@enron.com'" <rhonda.l.denton@enron.com>
cc: "Abba Gana, Mustapha" <AbbaGanaM@merchantenergy.com>
Subject: From MEGA; Consent to Assignment....

Rhonda,

Please find attached for your review, a Consent to Assignment Agreement
between us, Enron Power Marketing, Inc. and Morgan Stanley Capital Group
Inc.  We would like to have the document ready to execute at about the same
time we execute the derivatives Consent to Assignment Agreement with Enron
North America, and we are waiting for FERC approval on the Physical Power
Sales as well.  I just wanted to present the agreement to you now, so that
if it is necessary, we have time to discuss any concerns.  I look forward to
talking with you to work toward the execution of the Agreement.

 <<EPM (POWER) Assignment Consent Agreement 042501.doc>>

Thanks,

Kristina M. Drew
Contract Administrator
Merchant Energy Group of the Americas, Inc.
410.295.1708

 - EPM (POWER) Assignment Consent Agreement 042501.doc


I wish I knew of someone for you -- I'll keep my ears open.  How are you
doing?  Our baby is due 1/16 -- we are all very excited although it will be
interesting to see how 31-month old Emma reacts!  Looks like we might be
ships passing in the night with my leaving and your returning, but I hope to
see you soon.

Leslie

	Carol St Clair
	11/16/2000 11:33 AM

		 To: Julia Murray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth
Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, tchandler@velaw.com, Janet H
Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cynthia Harkness/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Kristina Mordaunt/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Ann Ballard/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Shonnie
Daniel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Mellencamp/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Looking For A Nanny

I need to start thinking about hiring a nanny to take care of Charles, our 4
month old and Arthur, our 9 year old.  We are looking for someone that can
come to our house during the week as we do not have room for a live-in.  We
live off of 290 West, about 25 miles from downtown.  We would prefer someone
that is legal and speaks English, but won't rule out anyone else.  If you
know of someone that might be interested, please call or e-mail me.  While I
would prefer not to use an agency, if you know of a good one, please let me
know. Please pass this message on to anyone else at Enron that you think
might be able to help.  Thanks.

Carol St. Clair
218-890-7122
carol.st.clair@enron.com


Sounds good so far.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 08/23/2000 01:24
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Mitch Robinson                           08/23/2000 01:21 PM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: Edgecombe Energy and Capacity Contract

Kay -

That should work, since our 3:00 is being obviated by our 12:30.

Mitch
---------------------- Forwarded by Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron on 08/23/2000
01:22 PM ---------------------------
From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 08/23/2000 01:17 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Heather Kroll/HOU/ECT@ECT, Herman
Manis/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John Moore/Corp/Enron@Enron, Larry
Soderquist/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matthew F Gockerman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mitch
Robinson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Ozzie Pagan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Edgecombe Energy and Capacity Contract

It doesn't look like Friday morning will work.  How do you guys look for
Thursday afternoon at 3:00 p.m.  We can have the meeting in EB38C1.  Please
advise via telephone (x37340) or email asap!  Thanks!

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	08/22/2000 05:06 PM

		 To: John Moore/Corp/Enron@Enron, Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mitch
Robinson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Larry Soderquist/HOU/ECT@ECT, Herman
Manis/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Matthew F Gockerman/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Heather Kroll/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ozzie Pagan/HOU/ECT@ECT, (bcc: Suzanne
Adams/HOU/ECT)
		 Subject: Edgecombe Energy and Capacity Contract

In an effort to pull the pieces together, a meeting has been scheduled to
discuss the draft energy and capacity contract (formerly the PPA).  It is
scheduled for Thursday, August 24th, at 900am.  We are still in the process
of locating a conference room, so the location is TBD.

Thanks,

Kay

Here are the most recent comments from VEPCO:

Some of you may have received this already.  I have not compared it against
what we last sent them.


Good Afternoon Sara,

I wanted to follow up to see what the status is regarding the Credit Suisse First Boston Equity Swap Basket documentation.

Please advise!

Regards,

Jorge A. Garcia
Manager- Risk Management
Enron Global Markets LLC
713/853-5596


The document references both the Marketing Strategy (MS) and the Trading and
Risk Policy (TRP) in the definitions.  Given the need for approval by the
Marketing Committee, should these be stand-alone documents??

Reagan C. Rorschach
Enron North America
1400 Smith Street
Houston, Texas 77002
713.345.3363


schedule and meeting file
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 01/21/2001 04:15 PM -----

	Kelly Johnson
	01/17/2001 03:21 PM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Mary Joyce/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron, Teresa Wright/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Comp Committee Notice - January 22, 2001


This has been sent down to Phillippe Bibi for signature.  I have not received
the signed copy back from Phillippe yet.

	Corinna Bolender/ENRON@enronXgate
	06/06/2001 10:18 AM

		 To: Mark Greenberg/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: SQL_MAIL/ENRON@enronXgate, Bob Ward/ENRON@enronXgate, John
Opalko/ENRON@enronXgate
		 Subject: RE: REVISED:  SQL 2000 SP1 JDP MOU

Has this been signed and sent to Microsoft?

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Greenberg, Mark
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 9:22 AM
To: Bolender, Corinna
Cc: Jones, Tana
Subject: Re: FW: REVISED:  SQL 2000 SP1 JDP MOU

Corinna -

I have looked at the attached.  It is fine.  I will be printing two originals
for Net Works' signature.  I'll have them sent down for signature so that
they can then be sent to Microsoft.

Mark
Senior Counsel, EWS
Phone:     713-345-8897
Facsimile: 713-646-3490
E-Mail:      Mark.Greenberg@enron.com

	Corinna Bolender/ENRON@enronXgate 05/31/2001 05:26 PM 	   To: Mark
Greenberg/NA/Enron@ENRON  cc: Charles Brewer/ENRON@enronXgate, John
Opalko/ENRON@enronXgate, Jim Ogg/ENRON@enronXgate, Bob Ward/ENRON@enronXgate,
jammo@microsoft.com@SMTP@enronXgate, schang@microsoft.com@SMTP@enronXgate,
rpierce@microsoft.com@SMTP@enronXgate  Subject: FW: REVISED:  SQL 2000 SP1
JDP MOU

Mark,

Can you please review the changes made by Susan Chang at Microsoft to the SQL
2000 SP1 JDP MOU for our Unify application.  Bob Ward is out of the office
until June 4th, and this application is going into production on June 11th.
We need to ensure the MOU is finalized and signed prior to going into
production so that we can receive the appropriate support from Microsoft when
we go live.

If you need to contact Susan her telephone number is 425-703-6394.  Her email
is schang@microsoft.com.

Thanks for your immediate attention to this matter,
Corinna Bolender
Desk: 713-345-4388
Cell:   512-632-4285

 -----Original Message-----
From:  "James Morris" <jammo@microsoft.com>@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22James+20Morris+22+20+3Cjammo+40microsoft+2Ecom+3E+40ENRO
N@ENRON.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 5:13 PM
To: Corinna Bolender; Bolender, Corinna; Ward, Bob
Subject: FW: REVISED:  SQL 2000 SP1 JDP MOU

Bob and Corinna,
Here are the versions of the MOU your lawyer will need to review.  As
expected, some of the items just did not make the bar to warrant a
change.  Specifically:
an actual date for the released product will not go on the MOU.
Customers who particpate in the JDP have a high degree of touch and
disclosure with MS.  Although we are glad to discuss dates and they draw
near with the customer we do not promise anything from the beginning
(though this hardly matters now considering the date).
The line in #4 that was cut and pasted to #17 has been placed back in
#4.  This is due to the placement of the topic in #4.  The rest of #17,
specifically stating that there is NO COST TO THE CUSTOMER has been left
in on #17, and I'll probably incorporate this for future use.  It is a
good addition.
#10 on Microsoft's section has been removed.  It is clearly rednundant
and not necessary.  We already say there is absolutely no cost to the
customer.

If this is agreeable (I have included the red lined version, so your
lawyers can review), the final version with those changes have also been
included.  Please print, sign and return.

Thanks!
JamMo!

-----Original Message-----
From: Susan Chang (LCA)
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 3:06 PM
To: James Morris
Cc: Susan Chang (LCA)
Subject: REVISED: SQL 2000 SP1 JDP MOU

James - per our phone call this afternoon, I've revised the MOU.
Attached is the redlined version as well as the final doc.  Please let
me know if you have any questions.

Susan

-----Original Message-----
From: James Morris
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 3:35 PM
To: Susan Chang (LCA)
Subject: FW: SQL 2000 SP1 JDP MOU

Susan,
I would like to permanently modify our MOU to the following for our
Joint Development Programs.  It is redlined, so you can review the exact
changes.  This is actually from the customer, but I like what they
changed and added, I just want to be certain that it's not going to come
back and bite me later.  Roughly 4 or 5 sentenced.
Thanks for you help!

-----Original Message-----
From: Ward, Bob [mailto:Bob.Ward@ENRON.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 8:49 AM
To: James Morris
Cc: Bolender, Corinna; Ogg, Jim
Subject: SQL 2000 SP1 JDP MOU

Hi, James.  I've attached a copy of the MOU which contains some minor
changes suggested by one of our attorneys.  Let me know what you think.
Thank you.

 <<JDP MOU 02-02-2001(microsoft- enroncomment5-1-01).doc>>

Bob Ward
Manager, IT - Development
ext. 54409

 - JDP MOU 02-02-2001(microsoft- enroncomment5-1-01).doc << File: JDP MOU
02-02-2001(microsoft- enroncomment5-1-01).doc >>
 - SQL 2000 SP1 JDP MOU.doc << File: SQL 2000 SP1 JDP MOU.doc >>


For your radar screen, I'm hearing that New Power Company may want to hedge out exposure today.  I'm unclear if it will be NYMEX, options or pipe options (T'CO)
Details are sketchy, once I know I'll pass it on

Frank


can you send the e-mail about the mexican resorts to dominator128@hotmail.com <mailto:dominator128@hotmail.com>?

Thanks,

E

-----Original Message-----
From: K. Bass [mailto:daphneco64@alltel.net]
Sent: Fri 1/11/2002 4:29 PM
To: Bass, Eric
Cc:
Subject: Re: UBS

Hi Eric,

I am excited that you will get back to work now.  I know you don't like being bored.

Sorry about Tahoe.  Las Vegas sounds interesting.  I'll talk to Dad.  I talked with Vivian this morning and we are planning on a golf trip maybe to Mexico.  I don't know when we will be going.  Las Vegas is not my first choice for a vacation after such a long time without one.  However, I welcome any opportunity to spend time with our son.  I'll talk with him tonight and let you know.

Have a great weekend.  Hi to Shanna.

Love you, Mom

----- Original Message -----
From: Bass, Eric <mailto:Eric.Bass@ENRON.com>
To: K. Bass <mailto:daphneco64@alltel.net>
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 12:41 PM
Subject: RE: UBS

Thanks.  Of the two - I think UBS is better.  It seems like they are a smaller, more specialized company that is more similar to our culture from a risk tolerance perspective.  It should be good.  Of course, anything is better than the way it has been.

We are not going to be able to go to Tahoe anymore b/c of scheduling conflicts with my boss, so we are planning on going to Las Vegas from Feb 13-16.  The airfare is $200/person roundtrip and we can stay at the aladdin or rio for about $100/night (or the bellagio for $200/night). We were wondering if you guys would be interested in joining us?

Let me know.

-Eric

-----Original Message-----
From: K. Bass [mailto:daphneco64@alltel.net]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 12:32 PM
To: Bass, Eric
Subject: UBS

Are you happy??  Congratulations!  LU-M

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Hey Dad,

Did you talk to the better half?  I was thinking Trulucks but if you can't
attend I understand.

Let me know,

Eric


-----Original Message-----
From: Gil Cisneros [mailto:gilc@usmcoc.org]
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2000 10:15 AM
To: *Gil Cisneros
Subject: USMCOC RMRC: Newest member; Colorado & International Real
Estate Company

Dear Gil:

Thank you for requesting information regarding my business.  First I am
pleased to be a new member of the US-Mexico Chamber of Commerce and look
forward to meeting you and the members.

I am an independent Real Estate Broker under my own name Paula A. McGowan
and
a CIPS (Certified International Property Specialist) located in Colorado
Springs, Colorado.  I have been active in Colorado Real Estate for the past
seven years and marketing Mexico property and assisting US/International
buyers since 1995.

The main purpose of my business is to assist inbound or outbound individuals
or companies who plan to invest or relocate to another country.  This
includes working with international professionals such as real estate
practitioners, attorneys, accountants, lenders or developers on their
behalf.
 I will assist companies wishing to locate production facilities in
Colorado,
Internationally or in Mexico such as the state of Sonora and will inquire
about government incentives to companies willing to relocate.  I also make
referrals to real estate practitioners and professionals in other countries.

I am a member of FIABCI, (The International Real Estate Federation) based in
France which provides me direct access to international real estate contacts
and professionals in over 55 countries throughout the world.  I am also a
member of The National Association of Realtors International, CIPS Network
which is a resource of hundreds of real estate practitioners who specialize
in international property practices throughout the globe. These
organizations
provide our members an avenue where we can market property for clients at
marketing sessions held during US and International conventions.  In
Colorado
I am a member of the Colorado Association of Realtors, the Pikes Peak
Association of Realtors and a member of the Broadmoor Golf Club.

When my parents moved to Mexico in the late 50's, my love of Mexico began.
I
made many trips to visit them, have close friends of 20 years in the Guaymas
area and know many of the business people.  My husband and I reside in San
Carlos, Sonora, Mexico part time.  We have been active in Mexico Senior Golf
Tournaments in Acapulco, Guadalajara and San Carlos during the past 14
years.
 We are past members of the Asociacion Mexicana A.C. De Golf Senior, the San
Carlos Country Club/Club de Golf de Guaymas and I am a member of Los
Recuerdos, a women's organization in San Carlos.

I presently market property in Guaymas, Sonora, Puerto Escondido, Oaxaca, a
home in Guadalajara and a 320 acre ranch in Valle De Bravo, Mexico.  These
properties can be seen on my website at
www.paulamcgowan.com.

Please feel free to contact me if I can be of help to you or the members.

Best Regards,

Paula A. McGowan, CIPS
Paula A. McGowan
722 Scorpio Circle
Colorado Springs, CO 80906
Ph/Fax:  719 633-2211
www.paulamcgowan.com
E-mail:  Pamcgowan@aol.com


FYI, the only people who knew who we invited to the meeting (but did not
attend) were Dick Riordan and Kevin Sharer...

Saturday, May 26, 2001 (SF Chronicle)
Enron's secret bid to save deregulation/PRIVATE MEETING: Chairman pitches his
plan to prominent Californians
Christian Berthelsen, Scott Winokur, Chronicle Staff Writers

   Energy executive Kenneth Lay, head of powerful Enron Corp., quietly
courted Arnold Schwarzenegger, Richard Riordan, Michael Milken and other
luminaries this week in Beverly Hills to drum up support for his solution
to California's energy crisis.
   His prescription called for more rate increases, an end to state and
federal investigations and less rather than more regulation.
   Lay, a close friend of President Bush and one of his largest campaign
contributors, hosted a private 90-minute meeting in a conference room at
the Peninsula Hotel in Beverly Hills on Thursday.
   Among the participants were Milken, the former head of the Drexel Burnham
Lambert investment banking firm who pleaded guilty to fraud charges in
1990 and who now runs a think tank based in Santa Monica; movie star
Schwarzenegger;
   and Riordan, the mayor of Los Angeles. Schwarzenegger and Riordan have
been courted recently as GOP gubernatorial candidates.
   One participant, who agreed to speak on the condition he not be
identified, said the meeting appeared to be geared toward getting
participants to support Lay's vision and then champion it to officials who
are trying to solve the state's energy mess.
   PLAN TO RESCUE DEREGULATION
   The source said the timing and tone of the meeting suggested Lay is
concerned that California will abandon its disastrous experiment with
power markets by either re-regulating the system or creating a government
authority to provide electricity. Gov. Gray Davis signed legislation last
week to create and fund a state power authority that would build, buy and
run power plants in California.
   "They're trying to rescue deregulation," the source said of Enron
executives. "They think the whole state power authority is a bad idea."
   At the meeting, Enron representatives circulated a four-page position
paper titled "Comprehensive Solution for California," which was obtained
by The Chronicle. It said ratepayers should bear responsibility for the
billions in debt incurred by the state's public utilities and that
investigations of power price manipulation and political rhetoric are
making matters worse.
   The paper made no mention of the possibility that much of the runaway
electricity costs in California is due to market manipulation by power
generators and traders -- a possibility given credibility in studies by
regulators and economists.
   One of the talking points read: "Get deregulation right this time --
California needs a real electricity market, not government takeovers."
Another point suggested giving consumers monetary rebates for conserving
electricity.
   INVOLVED IN EARLY DAYS
   Lay has been an aggressive champion of deregulated electricity markets and
was an early advocate in persuading California to begin its experiment
with a competitive power market system.
   Lay has created a new kind of company in the process, one that essentially
produces nothing but makes money as a middle-man, buying electricity from
generators and selling it to consumers. During the first quarter of this
year, Enron's revenues increased 281 percent to $50.1 billion.
   Asked about the purpose of the meeting, Karen Denne, a spokeswoman for
Enron, said she would "look into that" and then did not return repeated
telephone calls seeking comment. One participant said Denne was present at
the meeting.
   D.C. CONNECTIONS
   Meanwhile, Lay's power in Washington is reported to have reached
unprecedented heights. According to a story in yesterday's New York Times,
Lay supplied the Bush administration with a list of candidates for jobs
regulating the power industry and even interviewed one of them. The story
also said Lay essentially threatened to seek the removal of the chairman
of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Curt Hebert, if he does not
support Lay's desire to further deregulate the nation's electricity
system. Lay denied the allegation.
   Also in attendance at this week's meeting were Bruce Karatz, chief
executive of home builder Kaufman & Broad; Ray Irani, chief executive of
Occidental Petroleum; and Kevin Sharer, chief executive of biotech giant
Amgen.
   Among those who were invited but did not attend were former Los Angeles
Lakers star Earvin "Magic" Johnson; supermarket magnate and Bill Clinton
supporter Ron Burkle; and Dennis Tito, recently returned from the world's
first civilian space trip.
   Milken, through a spokesman, confirmed that he attended the meeting, but
declined to be interviewed. Schwarzenegger could not be reached for
comment through a publicist, and Sharer did not return a call yesterday
afternoon.
   A spokesman for Riordan, Peter Hidalgo, said the Los Angeles mayor
attended,
   but was "not intending to formulate any kind of policy position on this
issue.
   His intent is to listen to all sides."
   Attached to the Enron handout was a two-page open letter, addressed to
Davis and the state Legislature, apparently prepared for those who support
Lay's position and would be willing to sign their names to it. The source
who participated in the meeting said those assembled appeared noncommittal
and asked a number of questions of Lay, but did not agree to champion his
agenda.
   E-mail the writers at cberthelsen@sfchronicle.com and Scott Winokur at
swinokur@sfchronicle.com.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Copyright 2001 SF Chronicle


----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 12/27/2000 04:31 PM -----

	"Chiodi, Maria" <maria.chiodi@csfb.com>
	12/27/2000 04:18 PM

		 To: "'jim.armogida@enron.com'" <jim.armogida@enron.com>,
"'sara.shackleton@enron.com'" <sara.shackleton@enron.com>
		 cc: "Haratunian, Stephen" <stephen.haratunian@csfb.com>
		 Subject: Forward Confirmation

Jim and Sara:

Jim, I received your voice mail and apologize for taking so long to get back
to you.  I attach a copy of the last draft we discussed that contains the
new jurisdiction language.  I used some of your suggested language, ISDA's
section 13 wording and then just lifted the rest from the language in the
indemnity to the engagement letter that I faxed to you earlier today.
Please let me know if this is acceptable.

Thanks,

>  Maria Chiodi
>  Legal and Compliance Department
>  CREDIT | FIRST
>  SUISSE | BOSTON
>  Phone: 212-325-6724
>  Fax: 917-326-7763
>
>
 <<Fwd (12-27Trade1 BL to 12-22).doc>>

This message is for the named person's use only.  It may contain
confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information.  No
confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.
If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all
copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the
sender.  You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute,
print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended
recipient. CREDIT SUISSE GROUP and each of its subsidiaries each reserve
the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks.  Any
views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except
where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state
them to be the views of any such entity.
Unless otherwise stated, any pricing information given in this message is
indicative only, is subject to change and does not constitute an offer to
deal at any price quoted.
Any reference to the terms of executed transactions should be treated as
preliminary only and subject to our formal written confirmation.

 - Fwd (12-27Trade1 BL to 12-22).doc


Mark:

Attached is my current workload report.  I'm beginning to get nervous about
meeting traders' expectations as I am taking vacation from June 14 - 22
(seven business days) and I don't know who will be able to pick up my
emergencies and routine issues.

I have some idea about Mary's and Frank's workload and I have the impression
that Brent is constantly busy with weather.  I'd like to briefly discuss
Cheryl's workload  I think it would be a good idea to have everyone submit a
status report of sorts to you so that you can assess how much is "project"
oriented vs. routine, specific commodity areas, and volume.

FYI, I am trying to limit Cheryl's activity with Gary's group to brokerage
agreements only.  The huge volume of activity on the brokerage end was
apparently the result of a recent audit by AA and effort to "cleanup" the
agreement status.  It should be winding down.  I have encouraged Cheryl (as
have Frank and Mary) to provide you  with a workload report since we really
want her to be trained in the swap basics.

Also, I will try to schedule a conference call with David Mitchell, you and
me before I leave (topic is online trading of credit derivatives).
Currently, only ECL is offering the bankruptcy default swap online (and no
one is hitting the product).

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


If your team would like to contribute to this week's newsletter, please submit your BUSINESS HIGHLIGHT OR NEWS by noon Wednesday, October 31.

Thank you!

Kathie Grabstald
x 3-9610


Out on Friday, 09/22, for "floating holiday"...is that what it is called?
Thanks.


Cheryl,

Please keep me on this list.  I need to get it because on EnronOnline.
Please take Susan Flynn off the list.  She is no longer in our group, and I'm
not sure if she's still with Enron.

	Cheryl Johnson@ENRON
	01/16/2001 12:05 PM

		 To: Laurel Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amelia Alland/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lauri A
Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bridgette Anderson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Arfan
Aziz/LON/ECT@ECT, Cyndie Balfour-Flanagan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Edward D
Baughman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberlee A Bennick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Berg
Carver/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anne Bike/Corp/Enron@Enron, Georgia
Blanchard/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer Blay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fred Boas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob
Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda S Bryan/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Lesli Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anthony Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sylvia A
Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cary M Carrabine/HOU/ECT@ECT, Clem Cernosek/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Marilyn Colbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brad
Coleman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna Consemiu/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Cotten/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mike Croucher/HOU/ECT, Lisa Cousino/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Romeo D'Souza/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shonnie Daniel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cheryl
Dawes/CAL/ECT@ECT, Sherry Dawson/NA/Enron@Enron, Rhonda L Denton/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bradley
Diebner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cheryl Dudley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael Eiben/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Susan Elledge/NA/Enron@Enron, Faye Ellis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diane
Ellstrom/HOU/ECT@ECT, Veronica Espinoza/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Enron Europe Global
Contracts and Facilities, Enron Europe Global CounterParty/LON/ECT@ECT, Daren
J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jacquelyn Farriel/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Genia
FitzGerald/HOU/ECT@ECT, Irene Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shawna Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Susan Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hoong P Foon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rebecca Ford/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Camille Gerard/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scotty
Gilbert/TOR/ECT@ECT, Lisa Gillette/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carolyn Gilley/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Winston Goodbody/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amita Gosalia/LON/ECT@ECT, Mary G
Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Walter
Guidroz/NA/Enron@Enron, Andrea R Guillen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sanjeev
Gupta/NA/Enron@ENRON, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Bill D Hare/HOU/ECT@ect,
Kenneth M Harmon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tony Harris/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Peggy Hedstrom/CAL/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth L
Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda F Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marlene
Hilliard/HOU/ECT@ect, Liz Hillman/Corp/Enron@Enron, Nathan L
Hlavaty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carla Hoffman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jim Homco/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cindy
Horn/LON/ECT@ECT, Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rahil Jafry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nanette
Kettler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Troy Klussmann/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary W Lamphier/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kristian J
Lande/HOU/ECT@ECT, Monica Lande/PDX/ECT@ECT, Elsie Lew/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrew H
Lewis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim Little/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kori Loibl/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott F
Lytle/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matilda Machado/CAL/ECT@ECT, Hillary
Mack/Corp/Enron@Enron, Chris Mallory/PDX/ECT@ECT, Richard C
McKeel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nidia Mendoza/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carey M Metz/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard A Miley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bruce
Mills/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Patrice L Mims/HOU/ECT@ECT, Glenda D
Mitchell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jason Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom E Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jackie Morgan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeremy Morris/PDX/ECT@ECT, Michael W
Morris/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tracy Ngo/PDX/ECT@ECT, Debbie Nicholls/LON/ECT@ECT, John
L Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer Oliver/EU/Enron@Enron, Frank
Ortiz/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, B Scott Palmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie
Panus/NA/Enron@Enron, Anita K Patton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Regina Perkins/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard
Pinion/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip Platter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sylvia S Pollan/HOU/ECT@ECT,
John D Powell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cyril Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Claudia
Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT, EOL Call Center, Fiona
Skinner/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jennifer deBoisblanc Denny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joshua Meachum/NA/Enron@ENRON, Justin
Timothy/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Karen O'Day/NA/Enron@Enron,
Keith Clark/Corp/Enron@Enron, Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matt
Motsinger/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melba Lozano/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peter
Berzins/NA/Enron@Enron, Robert B Cass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rousseau
Anai/AP/Enron@Enron, Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Simone La Rose/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tara Sweitzer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Torrey
Moorer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joan Quick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donald
P Reinhardt/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey
Richardson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Richter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Oscar
Rivera/NA/Enron@Enron, Suzy Robey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Carlos J Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sam Round/HOU/ECT, Marilyn M
Schoppe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brad
Schneider/Corp/Enron@Enron, James Scribner/Corp/Enron@Enron, Dianne
Seib/CAL/ECT@ECT, James Shirley/HOU/EES@EES, Lynn E Shivers/LON/ECT@ECT,
Michele Small/LON/ECT@ECT, Mary M Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jefferson D Sorenson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carrie Southard/LON/ECT@ECT, Willie
Stewart/HOU/ECT@ECT, Geoff Storey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT,
John Suttle/HOU/ECT@ECT, Connie Sutton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Vance L Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward Terry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kim S
Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT, Veronica Thompson/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Mark D
Thorne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Philippe Travis/LON/ECT@ECT, Susan D Trevino/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Laura Vargas/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Claire Viejou/LON/ECT@ECT, Elsa
Villarreal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Walker/HOU/ECT@ECT, George
Weissman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karin Williams/HOU/EES@EES, Sony Wilson/HOU/ECT@ECT,
O'Neal D Winfree/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christa Winfrey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeremy
Wong/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rita Wynne/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Name Change/Merger Notification

Please find attached the Name Change/Merger Notification Report for January.
To launch the report, double click on the attachment and select Enable Macros
and Read Only.
Please note that:
 ERMS short names will be changed in GCP and ERMS each Friday at 10am Central
Time, and
 Inactivations will be made on Feb 1

We have made a few changes to our Name Change/Merger Notification Report - it
now has a new look and a couple of features we hope will assist you.  For
more information, please click below:

Each month now has two sheets, a summary sheet (eg Jan 01 Changes) and a
detailed sheet (eg Jan 01).
Click below for more information:

The summary sheet can be used to view all changes after a certain date.  If
you're aware of all changes up to, say, January 15th enter 01/16/2001 in cell
C6 of the Summary Sheet and click the Sort button in cell H6.  All changes
made to the report on or after January 16th will be listed automatically.
The Summary sheet may also be sorted for certain criteria - use the drop down
arrows alongside the column headers to make your selection.

This sheet contains all the information you are used to seeing, but slightly
reformatted.  Key points are:
In the case of an Inactivation, the cause of the Inactivation (eg Merger) is
listed in the Comments section
As with the previous format,
all months' reports will be sent cumulatively throughout the year
the report will be sent out twice each month, on the 15th and at the end of
the month.

It is our aim to publish the report in Livelink and to send out only the
summary sheet and a URL for the detailed report each month.  This will save a
lot of space in Lotus Notes and we hope it will streamline your monitoring
process.

We'd be very happy to receive any comments you may have.


I'm at my desk for about an hour.  Then after 3 pm Houston time.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	"Chernick, Sharon Confidential Memo-Counsel (Exchange)" <schernick@bear.com>
	02/13/2001 07:53 AM

		 To: "'Sara.Shackleton@enron.com'" <Sara.Shackleton@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: Enron Corp ("ENE") guaranty of Enron North America Corp.

Sara:

That definitely helps to move things along.  I will call you in a little
while.  What time works for you?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sara.Shackleton@enron.com [SMTP:Sara.Shackleton@enron.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 12, 2001 6:54 PM
> To: schernick@bear.com
> Subject: Enron Corp ("ENE") guaranty of Enron North America Corp.
>
> Sharon:
>
> With respect to the ENE form of guaranty, we will agree to delete
> Paragraph
> 4 (setoff and counterclaims) in its entirety.  This is a major concession
> by ENE.  Can you now agree to the remainder of the ENE guaranty format?
> Please let me know.  Thanks.
>
> Sara Shackleton
> Enron North America Corp.
> 1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
> Houston, Texas  77002
> 713-853-5620 (phone)
> 713-646-3490 (fax)
> sara.shackleton@enron.com

***********************************************************************
Bear Stearns is not responsible for any recommendation, solicitation,
offer or agreement or any information about any transaction, customer
account or account activity contained in this communication.
***********************************************************************


unknown

-----Original Message-----
From: Scott.Hendrickson@enron.com [mailto:Scott.Hendrickson@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 9:51 AM
To: bruce.s.grant@lmco.com
Subject: Re: FW: ALADDIN VISIT

So, what does that mean for last weekend?  Any love?

Scott


Hi Pierre -

My e-mail address is rosalee.fleming@enron.com.  The last name has a g on it.

daggett@heinzctr.org (Pierre-Marc Daggett) on 04/05/2001 04:42:56 PM
Please respond to "daggett@heinzctr.org" <daggett@heinzctr.org>
To: "'kenneth.lay@enron.com,'" <kenneth.lay@enron.com>, >,
"'rosalee.flemin@enron.com'" <rosalee.flemin@enron.com>
cc: Mary Hope Katsouros <Windows@heinzctr.org>
Subject: FW: Missed you today

-----Original Message-----
From: Mary Hope Katsouros [SMTP:mhk@heinzctr.org]
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 5:19 PM
To: 'Pierre Marc Daggett'
Subject: FW: Missed you today

Pierre-Marc,

Please make certain that Rosalee and Ken Lay received a copy of this.  I
know that my address for Rosalee was incorrect.

Thank you for the help.

Mary Hope

-----Original Message-----
From: Mary Hope Katsouros
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 4:30 PM
To: 'Ken Lay'
Cc: 'William Merrell'
Subject: Missed you today

Dear Ken,

We regret that your schedule did not permit you to visit with us this week
to discuss the Center's Global Change Program.  We do understand that the
White House probably has priority.

Rosalee indicated that you are available to meet at the Center on May 24th.
the day before the Board of Trustees meeting.  May I suggest that we invite
some members of the Steering Committee to join us on the 24th to review
where we are, the political environment, and continued Center involvement
in this program area.  As you are aware we have had discussions with the
Turner Foundation on a Leadership Forum and have developed several projects
which have each received partial funding commitments from the federal
government or private foundations.    Paul O'Neill, Tim Wirth, Bill Miller,
Teresa Heinz and Michael Oppenheimer are my suggestion of Steering
Committee members to join us.  Please give me your thoughts.

As always, Mary Hope

**************************************
Mary Hope Katsouros
Senior Vice President
The H. John Heinz III Center for Science, Economics and the Environment
1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Suite 735 South
Washington, DC  20004
Phone:  (202) 737-6307
Fax:      (202) 737-6410
Email:    mhk@heinzctr.org


Please respond to
 - Experiencing God Week 6.doc


Debi, I will prepare a draft response for you.  Michelle

Debi Vanwey
08/07/2000 01:24 PM
To: Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Reference

Michelle, should I respond?
---------------------- Forwarded by Debi Vanwey/HOU/ECT on 08/07/2000 01:23
PM ---------------------------

"Priscilla Poss" <priscilla.poss@rextrucking.net> on 08/04/2000 05:40:45 AM
To: <dvanwey@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Reference

Debbi,

First off, I am wondering how you knew the company name I was calling on.  I
never gave that other girl the name of the company.

Any how, I am wanting information on Contracting Solutions, Inc.  They
listed your company as a reference, and I have been trying to chase this
down for about two months now.  I have been able to contact the other two
references they had given, but the one with your company has been a bear to
run down.

They stated that they have worked with your company on a permanent
placement.  Is this correct?

How was their performance? (did they respond timely with qualified
candidates? With legitimate resumes of real people or were the people no
longer available when you wanted to interview them?, etc.)

Can you tell me if there have been any problems with this company? (if yes,
what are they.)

Are you currently doing business with them?  (If yes, please proceed to the
next question, if no, Please tell me why?)

Do you have any additional information that would assist me in doing
business with this company?

Is there any way you can respond as soon as possible, I would like to either
approve them or close this file.

Priscilla
Rex Trucking