---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 11/30/2000
03:54 PM ---------------------------

Joe Kishkill@ENRON
11/28/2000 01:25 PM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Cuiaba Review

Dave,

Here is the list of folks involved in Cuiaba.

Laine Powell and his team - Project execution team for Cuiaba, located in
Cuiaba
Jose Anson - Develpment -  Engineering/Permitting
Joan Carlos Albuquerque - FURNAS/Eletrobra relationship
Valeria Lima - ANP relationship
Daine Duarte - Local in Cuiaba.  Sounds like formally part of Lammers' team,
but practically part of Laine's team
Jose Lucio dos Reis Neto - Agencies involved in electric system operation.
Recovery oil fuel oil costs (complicated story/very important task)
Jose Bestard - Project continuity.  Original PPA negotiations
John Novak - Lawyer...key to financing
Rob Gay - Financing lead...key to financing
Rick Lammers - Commercial project lead

I sent this on top of Pete Weidler's e-mail and summarized a good part of it
above.  Only Lammers and Gay were not mentioned in Pete's e-mail.

Another thought...pull people in from EE&CC as part of the "new team".  No
basis in fact here, but I suspect there are too many contractor/owner games
going on.  Probably need the EE&CC key people list as well.  Do you want me
to shake it loose, do you want to work it with Leff, or bad idea?

Let me know if you have any additional questions.

Thanks,

KIsh

---------------------- Forwarded by Joe Kishkill/SA/Enron on 11/28/2000 04:13
PM ---------------------------

Peter E Weidler
11/27/2000 08:17 PM
To: Joe Kishkill/SA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: Cuiaba Review

Joe - this is the list I asked Laine to put together. - I asked him not to
list all the folks under Laine - as I assume they stay with the project no
matter where it goes.

Jose Anson - he is the coordinator of permitting at IBAMA and ANP for the
pipeline.  He is also involved with working on the FUNAI issues a result of
his efforts on the IBAMA license.  Key person.

Joao Carlos A. - although he is working on the project on an ad hoc basis he
is key in terms of the FURNAS/Eletrobras relationship.  Not only does he know
folks but he also gets things done within the system.

Valeria Lema - She is the relationship manager with ANP.

Daiane Duarte - Daiane Duarte is on the PanEng payroll until the end of the
year after which she has been dialed out.  Have asked Rick several times
about her future with his group.  She is critical locally in Cuiaba due to
relations with FEMA and other agencies for obtaining the state permits that
are still outstanding as well as working with Anson et al.

Lucio Reis - he is very active in working with ANEEL/ONS/MAE and others.  He
has been a key to our success on the CCC account.  He is a must to making the
project successful.  Knows the contacts and basically understands the project
from the regulatory and CCC account point-of-view.

Two other people that are not involved in "our side" of fence on a daily
basis but are valuable are Jose Bestard and John Novak.  Jose knows the
history and John is the counsel with the longest tenure on the project.

Pete

Joe Kishkill
11/27/2000 06:16 AM
To: Peter E Weidler/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: Cuiaba Review

Pete,

But you (or does anyone) have a definitive team list for Cuiaba?  Need this
for transition planning purposes.  I agree with your sentiment that some
folks may be pulling double duty while we button up Cuiaba.   Just need to
know "how many" and "who".

Thanks,

Kish

Peter E Weidler
11/26/2000 09:07 PM
To: Laine A Powell/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Joe
Kishkill/SA/Enron@Enron, Richard A Lammers/SA/Enron@Enron, Brett R
Wiggs/SA/Enron@Enron, John Novak/SA/Enron@Enron, Rob G Gay/NA/Enron@Enron,
Jose Bestard/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: Cuiaba Review

we can do this by phone.

Pete
---------------------- Forwarded by Peter E Weidler/NA/Enron on 11/26/2000
06:06 PM ---------------------------

Peter E Weidler
11/26/2000 05:59 PM
To: Laine A Powell/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Joe
Kishkill/SA/Enron@Enron, Richard A Lammers/SA/Enron@Enron, Brett R
Wiggs/SA/Enron@Enron, John Novak/SA/Enron@Enron, Rob G Gay/NA/Enron@Enron,
Jose Bestard/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: Cuiaba Review

Rebecca has asked for a review of the Cuiaba project.   Her current thinking
is that it should be under one shop - not split responsibility.   Which shop
is not clear to me - I presume this will be decided pretty soon.

The review will take place the week of Dec 4th.   She wants a straight
forward  decription of what is left to be done and what the issues are.  I am
thinking the presenters are Laine, Rick, Jose.  In attendance are Rob and
John.     Can divide the presentation up into -

getting the construction finished/cost issues/EECC - subcontractor issues. -
Laine
Furnas/Electrobras issues - Rick
YPF - gas supply - Mark to market position - opportunities - Rick
MAE/ONS issues - current thinking.  - Jose
Current economics. - Rick

Everyone should have a page prepared ahead of time with the discussion topics
on it - she doesn't want a detailed presentation - just the facts.   Can we
send the page per topic around by this friday.

I will ask Rebecca for two hours the week of the 4th and let you know.

Joe - we should talk about where the project should best end up - I think
Rebecca is flexible -   don't really know what Dave is thinking.

Pete


Our first Working Group meting is set for Friday, January 21, 9 am - 11 am
Central Standard Time.  If you can't make it, please let me know and arrange
for an alternate, if possible.  At this meeting, we will develop group
objectives and some initial to-do's.

If you have not yet responded with your personal information and suggested
objectives, please do so prior to the meeting so we can update the agenda
with everyone's responses.  Thank you!

TIME:  Friday January 21  9AM CST
Call in Numbers - US    (will be provided with final agenda)
International                      (will be provided with final agenda)

In Houston, Room EB 4741

I.     Administrative Issues
 a.  why a working group
 b.  expectations

II.     Our group
 a.  roster
 b.  suggested objectives

III.    Consensus Group Objectives
 (develop single set for the group)

IV.   Identify initial set of subgroups
 a. purpose of subgroups


This is so great!

Return-Path: <cbarker3@msn.com>
Received: from  rly-zd01.mx.aol.com (rly-zd01.mail.aol.com [172.31.33.225]) by air-zd04.mail.aol.com (v79.27) with ESMTP id MAILINZD45-0802095533; Thu, 02 Aug 2001 09:55:33 -0400
Received: from  hotmail.com (oe65.pav0.hotmail.com [64.4.33.207]) by rly-zd01.mx.aol.com (v79.20) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINZD11-0802095514; Thu, 02 Aug 2001 09:55:14 -0400
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC;	 Thu, 2 Aug 2001 06:55:13 -0700
X-Originating-IP: [24.167.75.195]
From: "Carol Barker" <cbarker3@msn.com>
To: "Kelly" <KLBWebb@aol.com>, "Suzanne Ellis" <Bigehe@aol.com>,        "Sue Cruse" <SUEJAZZ@aol.com>, "Sherrie Sherertz" <ss@houston.rr.com>,        "Sandy Webb" <JWebb2917@aol.com>,        "Linda Spiegelhauer" <Linspieg@aol.com>
Subject: Fw: Women Power
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2001 08:59:10 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MSN Explorer 6.10.0016.1619
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_001_0002_01C11B31.64D7DB60"
Message-ID: <OE65exDAeys8FSA4Ale00013e27@hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Aug 2001 13:55:13.0184 (UTC) FILETIME=[C0638A00:01C11B5A]

----- Original Message -----
From: j gale
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 2:06 PM
To: Simona Joe Toliver; Barbara Sewell; Melanie Mosley; Sallie Helm; Carole Goodman; Carol Barker; April Barcello
Subject: Women Power

ARE YOU A BITCH?????
Some friends were sitting at the bar talking about their professions.
The first guy says "I'm a Y.U.P.P.I.E, you know....
Young, Urban, Professional, Peaceful; Intelligent; Ecologist"
The second guy says "I'm a D.I.N.K, you know....
Double Income, No Kids."
The third guy says, "I'm a R.U.B., you know...
Rich, Urban, Biker."
They turn to the woman and ask her, "What are you?"
She replies: "I'm a WIFE, you know....
Wash, Iron, F***, Etc."
A second gal answers their question before they even ask it:
"BITCH "So, just exactly what is a BITCH??????????" They ask in unison.
* B- BABE
* I- IN
* T- TOTAL
* C- CONTROL of
* H- HERSELF
>
So ladies, next time somebody calls you "Bitch"...SMILE......and say Thank
You!!!!!!!!
MAKE A WOMAN HAPPY!
PASS THIS ONE ON TO AS MANY WOMEN AS YOU KNOW!


I enjoyed visiting with you as well.  I was very impressed with the students
that I interviewed.  You guys are certainly doing a great job educating.
 I had the pleasure of visiting with Milagros and was very impressed with her
and I agree with your comments.

Some of the students were interested in additional reading that I thought
might be helpful to them.  2 books that I think are very good  are 1) Option
Volatility and Pricing by Sheldon Natenberg.  This is textbook type reading
that is the best book on options that I know.  2) Reminisences of A Stock
Operator by  Edwin Lefevre.  This is the best book on trading that I have
read (I am actually currently reading it for the fifith of sixth time).  It
is an easy read and is the real lfe story of a trader in the early 1900's.  A
must read for anyone who has interest in markets and trading.

Sincerely,

Scott Neal

Chip Ryan <cryan@lsu.edu> on 10/19/2000 07:30:58 PM
To: gdilli2@enron.com, sneal@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Recruiting

Hi Geynille and Scott,

I wanted to thank you for lunch today and tell you how much I enjoyed
meeting you.  Input from professionals such as yourself helps us to make
our classes more relevant and offer better advice to our students.  We
appreciate that you are willing to take the time to make this valuable
contribution.

One of my former students, Milagros Daetz, dropped by to see met later in
the day to tell me about her Enron interviews.  Milagros was very excited
about Enron and impressed with all of the people she had met.  I want to
offer an unsolicited recommendation on her behalf.  Milagros is one of the
most impressive students I have ever taught.  While her GPA (3.9) is
sufficient to certify her academic record, I wanted to comment on her
intangible qualities.  Milagros is mentally tough, hard working,
determined, and ambitious.  Just as important, she is a genuinely nice
person.  She deals with people very well and possesses what I would
describe as quiet leadership characteristics.  In other words,  she leads
by example and by reason.  I also find her to be mature beyond her age and
willing to assume responsibility for her own choices.  In short, I think
Milagros would be an asset to any organization.

Again,  it was good meeting you.  Please fell free to contact me if I can
help you in any way.

Regards,

Chip Ryan
Assistant Professor of Finance
E. J. Ourso College of Business Administration
Louisiana State University
Department of Finance - 2163 CEBA
Baton Rouge, LA  70803-6308
Tel: (225) 388-6258
Fax: (225) 388-6366
E-mail: cryan@lsu.edu


I walked past that office and it still looked a little messy.  Is someone
from Prjoect Rock going to clean it out?


LAWYER--CLIENT CONFIDENTIAL

People:

I have recently seen a new Navajo Nation document concerning a ROW which
reflects a "standard term and condition" I had not seen before. Since I am not
sure whether you all have seen it, I am providing it in this e-mail:

"There is expressly reserved to the Navajo Nation full territorial
legislative, executive and judicial jurisdiction over the right-of-way and all
lands burdened by the right-of-way, including without limitation over all
persons, including the public, and all activities conducted or otherwise
occurring within the right-of-way; and the right-of-way and all lands burdened
by the right-of-way shall be and forever remain Navajo Indian Country for
purposes of Navajo Nation jurisdiction."

As you appreciate, this appears to be Steve Bloxham, Esq. (Navajo Nation
Department of Justice)'s latest response to federal court decisions on Indian
jurisdiction.

Perhaps it would save time for Steve if we simply had a provision in the ROW
which said, "In the event of any conflict between opinions of federal courts
and of Steve Bloxham, Esq., the opinion of Steve Bloxham, Esq. shall govern
this ROW. All ambiguities shall be resolved in favor of the Bloxham
interpretation."

Lawrence A. Ruzow


My  trading operations team, under the leadership of Mary Solmonson, is
sponsoring a working session on Thursday and Friday, June 15 and 16 in the
ballroom at the Rice.   Mary leads the team that manages Global Databases,
our global contract, counterparty and facilities databases that create the
common platform that facilitates the consolidation of information for credit
aggregation, risk exposure, customer information, feeds to SAP for financial
reporting, etc.    In addition to managing these databases, Mary has
harnessed information from these databases in a new way to create an
effective prospecting tool for use by originators and traders.  This tool can
help measure and increase coverage by industry segments.  This project,
Entelligence, has been endorsed by Greg Whalley and Jeff Shankman and is
currently under development for delivery later this quarter.

We invite you to speak to the group of Enron employees from offices worldwide
who will attend the working session next week.  Please let me know if you are
interested and if June 15 or June 16 fits your schedule.

Thanks for considering this speaking opportunity.


We lost 1/2 of the money on our west basis positions.
We lost the other 1/2 on fixed price length.


Dear Mr. Fujita:

We would be very honored to have you visit with Enron.  Dr. Kaminski is
available all day on Monday, April 17 and from 3:30 - 5:00 pm on Tuesday,
April 18.  Please let me know which day and time is convenient for you.

Thank you.

Sincerely,

Shirley Crenshaw
Administrative Coordinator
Research Group
713/853-5290


The following report contains confidential and sensitive information.  Please
treat with discretion.

Executive Summary:
? FERC price cap decision reflects Bush political and economic objectives.
Politically, Bush is determined to let the crisis blame fall on Davis; from
an economic perspective, he is unwilling to create disincentives for new
power generation
? Davis finds four major flaws with FERC plan, most notably its exclusion of
out-of-state generators
? June 1st "kill clause" for FERC order could coincide with new Bush regional
plan
? California facing growing fiscal risk following bond downgrade, expected
$20 billion power bill this summer--economic crisis would force deeper
Administration involvement
? QF bid for advance payments from PG&E likely to fail in bankruptcy court
? New generation delays probable because of State/QF squabbling
? Consumer groups are preparing a constitutional challenge to SoCal bailout
deal

1. FERC Fallout
The FERC decision is a holding move by the Bush administration that looks
like action, but is not.  Rather, it allows the situation in California to
continue to develop virtually unabated.  The political strategy appears to
allow the situation to deteriorate to the point where Davis cannot escape
shouldering the blame.  Once they are politically inoculated,  the
Administration can begin to look at regional solutions.  Moreover, the
Administration has already made explicit (and will certainly restate in the
forthcoming Cheney commission report) its opposition to stronger price caps
on the grounds that they are unwilling to create disincentives to the
construction of new generation.

It is interesting and ironic to note that electricity generators were
generally happy with the FERC order and that the only FERC commissioner who
favors price caps actually voted against this plan.

2. Something Less than Effective Price Caps
 From Davis's point of view, the FERC plan has four major flaws:
? The order applies only to California, not to the rest of the west.
Non-California generators are not required to sell at capped rates to
California.
? As the order is written, it is more of a price floor for emergency power
than a ceiling.
? State officials also believe that energy suppliers will continue to game
the system, because the price mitigation scheme only kicks in after a Stage 2
emergency and does not require any collusion.
? Even when the price caps kick in, they are based on the cost-plus for the
highest cost producer supplying power to California and do not require
wholesalers to abide by the cap.  The generators can also charge above the
cap, provided they can subsequently justify the excess charge to FERC.

3. Proposal "Kill Clause" Adds to the Political Dilemma for Davis
The FERC proposal includes a "kill clause" that says the caps will be
withdrawn unless California's ISO agrees by June 1st to become part of the
regional grid now under FERC control.  If Davis doesn't sign on to the
regional grid by June 1st, then he will have to live with June 2nd headlines
blaming him for letting the "Bush price caps plan" collapse.

4. Growing Fiscal Risk in California
Sources speculate that California  could therefore pay as much as $20 billion
on power this summer - this is more  than the combined enterprise value of
PG&E and SCE.  These sources believe that, because of the severity of the
situation, the FERC and/or the  federal government will be forced to take
further action to control prices for  power.

The consensus is that the state of California will run out of money in about
90 days. One of the first projects to be cancelled will be state plans to
finance new power plant construction in exchange for long-term power deals.
The bleak fiscal picture is also causing bank creditors to revisit the bridge
loans they are providing to California.

The Bush Administration and the Fed are only now waking up to the seriousness
of the fiscal picture.  The country's largest and most prosperous state will
have gone from large surpluses to serious debt downgrades and devastating
deficits in a matter of months.

5. QFs to Seek Advance Payment from PG&E
Meanwhile, on the bankruptcy front, the QFs reportedly  will ask the
bankruptcy judge today to give them advance payment from PGE's  accounts,
since their natural gas vendors have likewise demanded advance payment  for
gas. It appears very unlikely that the QFs' request will be granted. If the
QFs do not receive advance payment, it is likely that most of the 4,000 mw
of gas-fired QF capacity will remain offline.

6 Delays Likely in New QF Generation
The QF deals made with the state for long-term contracts are  being
continually renegotiated, which is likely to mean that the new plants  those
contracts are supposed to finance will not be online as early as  anticipated.

7. Consumer Groups Ready to Challenge Constitutionality of SCE Bailout Plan
Harvey  Rosenfield and his colleagues reportedly have been reviewing an
analysis  of the MOU for the SCE bailout  plan.  The analysis was done by a
utilities analyst, rather than a lawyer, though it appears to raise a number
of  good legal points. For example, one of the elements of the MOU is a
"non-bypassable" charge  on ratepayers that would require  them to pay even
if they disconnect from the grid. This is effectively a tax,  since there is
no exchange of value  for money, which under the CA constitution cannot be
used to directly  benefit a private entity.  This makes  the bonds that would
be issued are general obligation bonds, rather than revenue  bonds. According
to the constitution, the state cannot be put into debt to  benefit a private
company.  For this and other reasons, even if the  Republicans would vote for
the SCE bailout, which remains  unlikely, the bailout probably would not
stand a likely constitutional challenge.

8. Governor Hurt by Continued Failure to Disclose Long-Term Power Contracts
The issue of the Governor's failure to  disclose the details of the long-term
power  contracts continues to  distress the other players in the  crisis.
Even if he were to  disclose everything he and his staff have been
negotiating, it is likely that their actions and negotiations will
challenged, creating an even further delay.


Attached please find a copy of the memo from F. Mitchell Dutton regarding
Into Product Definition and Formation of Regional Transmission Organization
for the 5:00 p.m. (EST) Conference call today.  Please contact Mitch Dutton
at (614) 223-1605 or myself at (614) 324-6843 if you have any questions or
comments.

(See attached file: 87712.DOC)

Thank you,

DJ Stephens

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This e-mail message from the Legal Department of American Electric
Power is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential and privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure or distribution is prohibited.  If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all
copies of the original message.
 - 87712.DOC


COLUMBIA GAS TRANSMISSION CORPORATION
                        NOTICE TO ALL INTERESTED PARTIES
                                OCTOBER 18, 2001

Notice ID: 3194
5 - NO RESPONSE REQUIRED

Individuals from the following teams will be on duty (from 8:00 a.m. until
10:00 p.m.) in Customer Services on Saturday, October 20, 2001 and Sunday,
October 21, 2001:

NOMINATIONS & CONFIRMATIONS

Team 6                        304-357-3702
Team 7                        304-357-2827

Individuals from Team 1 (Evening Shift) will be on duty (from 2:00 p.m. to
10:00 p.m.) October 22 through October 26, 2001:

NOMINATIONS & CONFIRMATIONS

Team 1                        304-357-3708

Please note that the Columbia Navigator system is unavailable every Sunday from
11:00 p.m. until Monday at 6:00 a.m. for routine system maintenance.

If you have any questions, please contact your Account Representative.


Excellent solution!

	From:  Bob Shults                           12/14/99 02:02 AM

To: Kathryn Cordes/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer deBoisblanc Denny/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent A
Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Forster
Subject: Re: Aquila

I have talked to Aquilla on several occasions (including today) and they
continue to say they are capable of playing by the rules.  I will talk to
them again tomorrow and suggest that we shut off their capability to trade
physical gas online (and vica versa for Aquila Energy Marketing).  They have
asked us not to do this however I believe it may be time to revisit this.  We
do have the legal ability to hold them to their click deals however they do
not have the contracts to manage physical gas. This would obviously make a
messy situation.  I suggest that you call Jennifer Denny, Torrey Moorer or
myself as soon as you see one of these transactions in the future as we can
check into it immediately.

All transactions that have occured will be assigned by Aquila to Aquila.
Mark Taylor will draft the agreements and Aquila has agreed to this.

	Kathryn Cordes
	12/13/99 05:15 PM

To: Bob Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer
deBoisblanc Denny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T
Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Aquila

We need to know what the resolution plan is to getting Aquilia straight for
trading Physical and Financial products.   Today we saw Aquilia Risk trade
Next Day Physical Gas again and we were asked to move the deal to Aquilia
Energy.  What is being done to get Aquilia Risk from continuing to enter
Physical trades on line?  My concern for this trade was that we brought it to
Credit's attention this morning and did not get final word to move the deal
to Aquilia Energy until late in the day (4.45pm) which affects Logistics
ability to nominate for next day business.  Logistics has been made aware of
the late nom and will be working with the Pipe to get the nom in.  If there
are issues with this late nom from the pipeline we will let you know.

I'm not comfortable with the internal process of  counterparty name changing
of EOL deals and would like to get comfortable with how we are going to set
this process up.  I think there should be legal review of all deals that we
change and would suspect that some form of communication would need to be
conveyed to the counterparty.

KC


On this deal for Chris Mallory prebon says it should be 50 mw and we show it
as 25 mw.
Can you please check with him.


I have updated the list to reflect all changes received. If you notice any more errors or if any counterparties have been reassigned, please let me know so that I can continue to make changes.
Also, please see Louise's additions at the bottom of the list (from Adams Resources Marketing downward) and let me know if you have good relationships with any of these counterparties and could please take responsibility for them. Otherwise, our marketing team will be contacting these customers.
Finally, please note that even though there may be names for a specific counterparty in both the gas and the power columns, the person ultimately responsible for contacting that customer regarding the password application and registration forms is the person in the PA column on the far right.
Please remember when you are speaking to your customers to get all contact info possibly including contact name, phone and fax, e-mail, and address and send all this to Mary Griff Gray so that she can send them the PA and registration forms.

Please call me at 5-3614 if you have any questions or come by my desk at 06541.

Jennifer McQuade


A couple of deals that we might consider reserving some prudency against.

TBG  - sale
Duke (FGT/Manchester-LNG) - purchase

I will update later today if we can think of other deals to consider.


let me know if this is what you were looking for.  i could only find data back to April of 97, i'll keep looking.

From:	Harry Arora/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/25/2001 12:51 PM
To:	Russell Ballato/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject:	RE: cash charts

Russell

I need the cin daily charts for 97,98 and 99.  If this specific index is not available, I need some hourly or daily number to give an approximatin ( +-10%) of where actual clearing took place. Thanks

Harry

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ballato, Russell
Sent:	Tuesday, March 20, 2001 5:55 PM
To:	Arora, Harry; Gupta, Gautam
Subject:	cash charts

 << File: cin cash.xls >>


Backup for the graphs.
---------------------- Forwarded by Clement Lau/HOU/ECT on 05/08/2000 09:15
AM ---------------------------

Richard Park@ENRON
04/25/2000 09:00 PM
To: Don Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Benjamin Thomason/HOU/ECT@ECT, Clement Lau/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Reliant Stock/Portfolio

Latest versions


I am sorry I could not call you earlier to talk about this; I have been in
Washington D.C. the last few days with my CEO for meetings.

First of all I want to say that I am very, very sorry that you have had to
deal with the Bill Perry issue in any way.  I think it is entirely
inappropriate to involve either of you and I am sure it has caused you
distress.  I am also sorry that I went onto Bill Perry,s property last
weekend and I promise to NEVER go on Bill Perry,s property again.

Last weekend the 6 of us took the usual hike around the Johansson,s property
and ended up on Roseman Creek road next to Bill Perry,s property with the
observation deck.  Scott has never seen the deck and has heard a lot about
it so I (in not my best judgment) thought it would be ok to quickly go up to
the deck and check it out for a couple minutes and come right back.  We did
not intend on hanging out on the deck or spending more than a couple of
minutes.  All I wanted to do was show Scotty where it was and what it looked
like.  Kent and Scott had been talking about building one on our property
and I wanted them to see it.  We went in the middle of the day and we did
not bring any drinks, bottles, cigarettes, or food.  We purposely went out
there with nothing, spent a couple of minutes and came right back.  I am not
saying that this was right (because it was still trespassing), but we did
not go out there as we had in the past.

Then, on Sunday, Bill Perry came (unannounced) to the dome and started
yelling at me.  He called me horrible names and said he was calling the
Sheriff.  I only spoke nicely to him and apologized repeatedly.  I also
promised him that I would never go onto his property again.  He embarrassed
me and said bad things about me and both of you regarding things that are
not even related to this event.  He also said that people continue to go on
his deck and disrespect his property.  This is when I knew that it is not
just us that has used his deck.  I have not been on his property in two
years and I know Prentice and Jeff haven,t either.  He complained that
things have still be mistreated and he blamed me for things that I could not
have done.  I know that what I did was not right and I tried to let him see
that I was sincere about never going there again, but he would not listen.

I know that I have to deal with this issue.  I assume you have the name of
the Sheriff so I can speak with him (and I hope you referred him immediately
to me).  You should not have been called in this matter and that is VERY
upsetting to me.  You did not trespass.  Trespassing is not a crime that is
against another person,s property, but rather against another person.  There
is no reason why you should be involved.  I am a 32 year old adult, full
capable of being responsible for my own actions.  I may make mistakes, but
it is not your responsibility to answer for those mistakes and I am sorry
that you have been put in this position.

Cameron Sellers
Vice President, Business Development
PERFECT
1860 Embarcadero Road - Suite 210
Palo Alto, CA 94303
cameron@perfect.com
650.798.3366 (direct dial)
650.269.3366 (cell)
650.858.1095 (fax)


Ken, I think we should pass on the sponsorship of this event.

If you have a different view, lets discuss at your earliest convenience.

Thanks
Delainey


We need to make certain that the transport  for Pasdena is booked properly in
sitara.  I am taking a flash to actual hit on P&L because of our inability to
book this deal properly.  I need the transport booked in sitara at index to
index, and then book the fixed cost payed to Pasadena in an index minus sale
to them at the border.  Please run a minibook of the transaction thru the
remaining term and let me review it.  Please let me know when this has been
fixed.

Kim, what is the cost of the transport for the month of May?  Did we roll the
cost from April?  Also, did we change the index in the San Juan to Inside
Ferc?

Thanks,

Mike


I took the Executive Influence and Impact program in May 1999 and also took
the follow up Communications program in 2000.  Is this another program that
you are contacting me about, or would Enron like for us to repeat the
program?  Hopefully HR records indicate that I completed the two programs in
1999 and 2000.  Just let me know if I need to sign up for anything.  --Sally

From: Ryan Seleznov/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/08/2001 02:26 PM
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Executive Impact and Influence Program- Enrollment

Sally, attached is participant information and an enrollment form for the
program. Please let me know when you would like to attend and I would be
happy to make sure you get a convenient date.

Sessions will be held in Houston on the following dates:

 May 14-15
 September 11-12
 November 6-7

Thanks and let me know if you need any additional information.

Ryan


I think that you are absolutely correct in the assessment of the quantity
description, but this is the language that we use in all the Physical
Products and I would prefer not to change it - for the same reason that we
are making the Index and Loadshape language 'match' both Physical and
Financial Products, I don't want to change something that's already being
used extensively in the Physical Products.

However, Mark Taylor and I do suggest that we clarify how the Notional
Quantity is derived - which I think helps solve the issue; please see the
attached mark-up.

Sara - please call me ASAP on this.

Dale

Leslie Hansen
06/07/2000 11:26 AM
To: Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, John D
Suarez/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Eric Saibi/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: US East Power Financial Swap - ISO NE HE 11-23

Attached please find my revisions to the power financial swap product.
Please review and let me know if you have any questions or comments.  A
number of the changes I made are necessary to ensure that the product
components for the swap are compatible with the physical index product
components, e.g, the description of the index.

Regards,

Leslie

	Dale Neuner
	06/02/2000 01:47 PM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric
Saibi/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: US East Power Financial Swap - ISO NE HE 11-23

Eric, please get the attached in front of John Suarez and have him offer
comments/approval. In particular, ensure that

(i) the Product descritpion for the website is adequate (keep in mind I only
have 15 characters to work with)
(ii) the reference to the index is correct
(iii) the product will be priced on each day during the week, including NERC
holidays.

Leslie and Mark; once I get comments from commercial I'd like to have each of
you offer review and offer comments on this Product - final approval to come
from Mark.

Dale
3-9746


Let me know if this has not been done.

Ina
---------------------- Forwarded by Ina Rangel/HOU/ECT on 01/17/2001 01:35 PM
---------------------------

From:  Karen O'Day @ ENRON
         01/17/2001 10:54 AM

To: Ina Rangel/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: URGENT APPROVAL NEEDED

Approval has been sent to him with his log-in.

Ina Rangel@ECT
01/17/2001 10:03 AM
To: approval.eol.pcg@enron.com
cc:

Subject: URGENT APPROVAL NEEDED

You have received a request for John Griffith (request id# 13515) and we need
this request processed as soon as possible please.  He needs to begin trading
and is waiting on this.

Thanks,
Ina Rangel
X 3-7257


just added - 559276

Kerri Thompson@ENRON
03/23/2001 01:56 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: apb checkout

missing deal for tom a

sell williams
260.00
25 mw
26th
pv
off peak


I am available.
PL


Carolyn,

GE is calling for the original turbine contract.  I believe I previously
provided Lee Johnson's address.  Could you send him an original?

Thanks,

Kay


Just double checking my numbers, this is what I now show on COH storage.  Let
me know if I need to tweak it and where.

Month  Monthly Inj Ending Balance
Jul  1,089,097 4,053,906
Aug  1,089,123 5,143,029
Sep  786,579  5,929,608
Oct  120,999  6,050,607  <=== Max storage


Is this Enerfin gas we delivered?  What are the deal numbers in Sitara and
how much volume are we talking about?
Darren, Isn't there an OBA set up in Enerfin that can handle small volumes?
THANKS

	From:  Meredith Mitchell                           12/12/2000 08:34 AM

To: Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: HPL discrepancy

Victor,

What's your opinion on this?  Can we go back and add days to prior month
deals?  Do we use the same price?  If we do decide to do this, we will need
to get TETCO to agree to do a retro for those days as well.

Jackie Young
12/11/2000 03:53 PM
To: Cynthia Franklin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Meredith Mitchell/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: 10/2000 - Days 6 and 19 (98-0439)

The above referenced days have been placed on strangers gas due to (I guess)
the meter not being turned off in time.  The day prior to each of these days
that are assessed to strangers gas, the only active K is the HPL 216.

Can these deals be rolled to cover these couple of days?

Thanks
-Jackie-
3-9497


Simon,
It may make sense for you to make a copy of the confirmation of all outstanding trades for ENA and ECT Investments Inc and send to us here.  Then, if no one is left in London, we will be able to get the documentation from here.

Thanks,
Sheila

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hemsley, Simon
Sent:	Thursday, January 10, 2002 7:40 AM
To:	Glover, Sheila
Cc:	Seyfried, Bryan
Subject:	As requested

Sheila - this is sorted by company/counterparty


I AM important around here.  I am definitely up for lunch.  How's 11:30 suit
you?  If that's not good just give me a time.

Talk to ya later,
Robin


Start Date: 3/12/01; HourAhead hour: 19;  HourAhead schedule download failed.
Manual intervention required.


Please add Lisa Bills, Chris Herron and Mitch Robinson.  You have Lisa's info
on the GE list.

Thanks,

Kay


Shirley,

We want to take Kirstee to dinner on Wed next week to Brennan's
at 6:00. 4 persons, reservation in my name, TT, GM, VK, KH.

Vince


Today's IssueAlert Sponsors:

  <http://secure.scientech.com/rci/wsimages/customer-carebanner.jpg>
SCIENTECH is currently interviewing 1,500 utilities on CIS/CRM and customer care
in the United States and Canada to determine:

The leading software providers
Drivers of utility technology decisions
Analysis of license sales versus ASP sales
New market opportunities
Growing/shrinking software markets

Download a sample prospectus for an introduction to this new survey at: <http://secure.scientech.com/specialpages/Multi_Client.asp> and
contact Jon Brock at 505-244-7607 for more details.
 <http://secure.scientech.com/issueswatch/article.asp?id=832>
Miss last week? Catch up on the latest deregulation, competition and restructuring developments in the energy industry with SCIENTECH's IssuesWatch <http://secure.scientech.com/issueswatch/article.asp?id=950>

  <http://secure.scientech.com/rci/wsimages/scientech_logo_small.jpg>
  <http://secure.scientech.com/rci/wsimages/IssueAlert_Logo_188.jpg>

October 22, 2001

Enron's Departure from Core Business
Takes a Toll on Performance

By Will McNamara
Director, Electric Industry Analysis

  <http://secure.scientech.com/rci/wsimages/will100border_copy.jpg>

[News item from Reuters] Enron Corp. (NYSE: ENE) stock sustained further heavy losses on October 19 as investor confidence in the former Wall Street favorite remained at a low ebb after it reported its first quarterly loss in over four years. The energy giant's stock was off $3.32 or 11.45 percent at $25.68 per share at mid-day trade on Oct. 19, making a cumulative loss of 28 percent for a week in which it reported a third-quarter loss of $638 million. As of early morning trading on Oct. 22, Enron shares were priced at $21.99, a reflection of new developments (including a new Securities and Exchange inquiry) that have caused uncertainty about the company among investors.

Analysis: Enron's first financial report since the departure of former CEO Jeffrey Skilling in August has not done much to once again instill investor confidence in the company, which has experienced one of its most turbulent years in recent memory. While Skilling cited personal reasons for his departure, many analysts suspected that a significant drop in Enron's share price and financial losses in its diversified businesses also played a role. At the time of Skilling's departure, Enron's stock had tumbled to a 52-week low. However, based on the new 3Q report, it now appears that Enron's downward turn may be continuing despite the return of Kenneth Lay to the company's top spot. In essence, Enron's financial problems have been caused by businesses that the company has established as a way to diversify from its core focus on wholesale power sales. It appears that Enron is learning a costly lesson-namely that investors are not responding favorably to the company's innovation, especially if bottom line performance is in any way compromised. The road ahead may remain uncertain for Enron, as a good number of unresolved issues and a new Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) inquiry into financial dealings of its chief financial officer continue to overshadow the company.

Let's first establish the financial losses that Enron has reported in the third quarter. As noted, as a whole the company reported $638 million in losses, after taking $1.01 billion in charges associated with several of its non-core businesses. When we break down the losses, it becomes clear that Enron is struggling with its operations in three businesses: water, broadband and the retail power market. Specifically, Enron reported $287 million in charges from Azurix, its water and wastewater business; $180 million in charges related to the downsizing of its broadband operations (including severance costs and losses on inventory sales and customer contracts); and $544 million in what the company is calling "investment losses." Evidently, about half of the $544-million figure is related to Enron's investment in NewPower Company, the retail electricity and natural-gas provider that Enron launched about two years ago with partners America Online and IBM. Enron owns 45 percent of NewPower. In addition, Enron's debt to total capitalization ratio reportedly will increase to about 50 percent, although Lay says that pending asset sales may reduce that amount to 40 percent by the end of 2002. However, it is important to note that Enron's 3Q recurring net income (before the write-offs) did increase 35 percent to $393 million, or 43 cents a diluted share, and revenue in the quarter rose to $47.6 billion from $30 billion in 3Q 2000.

The losses associated with NewPower are particularly interesting. As one of the leading investors in the company, Enron drove NewPower's aggressive business focus on retail residential power sales, despite ongoing concerns about the development of retail competition across the United States. NewPower went public last year at an opening price of $21, and in the early days of its initial public offering was trading above that price. However, the company's stock has experienced a devastating drop in value, and is currently priced at $1.25. NewPower is not scheduled to release its own 3Q financial statement until early November, but it is expected that the company will continue to incur significant losses for the foreseeable future. Specifically, NewPower recently reiterated its earlier expectations of a 3Q loss of $65 million to $70 million, or $1.12 to $1.20 a share. Third-quarter revenue reportedly will be slightly lower than the $60 million to $65 million that the company had forecast in August.

In analyzing NewPower's 2Q financial losses (see IssueAlert from 8/8/01 at www.scientech.com/rci <http://www.secure.scientech.com/IssueAlert>), I argued that the company is really struggling from a mix of positive and negative factors in its efforts to become the leading retail energy provider in residential and small business markets in the United States. On the positive side, NewPower has recently secured a large number of new customer accounts, most significantly from its purchase of customers and related assets from AES Corp. and DTE Energy. These purchases prompted an impressive growth spurt for NewPower, and the company reportedly now has a customer base in 22 markets in 10 states. However, the bad news for NewPower is that its losses continue to widen, apparently resulting from a combination of weather factors and financial hits absorbed in several of the states in which the company operates. This dichotomy does not appear to be getting any better, and the company's stock has continued to drop as a result.

In an effort to alleviate some of its financial woes, NewPower recently revised an existing master netting agreement with Enron Corp. and several of its subsidiaries. The revised agreement essentially lowers the amount of cash collateral that NewPower is required to post to the Enron subsidiaries through Jan. 4, 2002. With the lowered financial obligations that it must make to Enron, NewPower believes that it will have sufficient financial resources to conduct its business in the near term until it secures ongoing asset-based financing.

However, from Enron's perspective, the losses associated with NewPower (and, by the same token, the losses in water and broadband) have contributed to a steady drop in its own stock price. The message is clear: The businesses that Enron plunged into as a way to diversify have tainted the company as a whole. Further, what some analysts perceived as brash hubris on Enron's part has not translated into measurable profits, and consequently Wall Street has reacted by sending Enron's stock to a level that is about half of where it was a year ago. The individual sectors that Enron has pursued are all unique, but they share the common denominator of taking Enron away from what was a successful core business. Further, they are similar in that Enron aggressively sunk large sums of capital into new business lines for which it arguably had unrealistic expectations for growth. The problem with Enron's bandwidth unit is that the company has faced an unanticipated excess of fiber-optic lines, which has prevented the demand for the division's services from materializing as anticipated. The problem with Azurix, which has been losing money since its formation in 1998, is that privatization of the water sector has not materialized as quickly as Enron and other companies anticipated. In addition to these problem areas, Enron also faces challenges related to its investments in India (where it is locked into a legal battle with the state government) and California (from which Enron has yet to receive full payment for previous power sales).

In addition to the losses outlined in the 3Q report, there are new issues that are brewing at the start of this week. First, the SEC has requested that Enron provide information regarding "certain related party transactions." Not much additional information is presently available about this inquiry. However, it is probably connected to earlier reports about concerns related to the dealings of Enron's Chief Financial Officer Andrew Fastow, who up until very recently had run a limited partnership that bought assets from Enron. Ken Lay has said that Enron will cooperate fully with the SEC's request. In a separate development, several mutual funds (including AIM Constellation that once held large positions in Enron) have either liquidated or reduced their holdings in the company, which has further weakened Enron's stock value. Portfolio managers of the mutual funds have cited concerns about Enron's ability to balance its new businesses with its core strength as an energy trader.

The present challenge for Enron is to convince investors that the company remains on solid ground despite the losses. Thus, Lay has been quick to reiterate that earnings from the company's energy and gas-pipeline business are still strong. Further, Lay says that the charges reported in the third quarter should be seen as a way to "clear away issues that have clouded the performance and earnings potential of our core energy businesses." Nevertheless, the fact remains that Enron has invested huge amounts of money toward its diversification effort, and in addition to water and broadband the company has invested into the steel and pulp and paper sectors as well. Thus, several questions remain at this juncture. Are the losses reported in the third quarter only a temporary setback for Enron that will clear the way for the company to return to a primary focus on its core business of energy trading? Or, will the losses continue into the fourth quarter and 2002? Moving forward, will Enron once again reshape its business model and eliminate the various businesses to which investors have reacted less than favorably? Only time will tell as the industry continues to watch the developments at Enron, which is clearly a company in the midst of another wave of change.

An archive list of previous IssueAlerts is available at
www.scientech.com <http://secure.scientech.com/issuealert/>

We encourage our readers to contact us with their comments. We look forward to hearing from you. Nancy Spring  <mailto:nspring@scientech.com>

Reach thousands of utility analysts and decision makers every day. Your company can schedule a sponsorship of IssueAlert by contacting Jane Pelz  <mailto:jpelz@scientech.com>. Advertising opportunities are also available on our Website.

Our staff is comprised of leading energy experts with diverse backgrounds in utility generation, transmission & distribution, retail markets, new technologies, I/T, renewable energy, regulatory affairs, community relations and international issues. Contact consulting@scientech.com <http://consulting@scientech.com> or call Nancy Spring at 1-505-244-7613.

SCIENTECH is pleased to provide you with your free, daily IssueAlert. Let us know if we can help you with in-depth analyses or any other SCIENTECH information products. If you would like to refer a colleague to receive our free, daily IssueAlerts, please reply to this e-mail and include their full name and e-mail address or register directly on our site.

If you no longer wish to receive this daily e-mail, and you are currently a registered subscriber to IssueAlert via SCIENTECH's website, please visit <http://secure.scientech.com/account/> to unsubscribe. Otherwise, please send an e-mail to to IssueAlert <mailto:IssueAlert@scientech.com>, with "Delete IA Subscription" in the subject line.
SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts(SM) are compiled based on the independent analysis of SCIENTECH consultants. The opinions expressed in SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts are not intended to predict financial performance of companies discussed, or to be the basis for investment decisions of any kind. SCIENTECH's sole purpose in publishing its IssueAlerts is to offer an independent perspective regarding the key events occurring in the energy industry, based on its long-standing reputation as an expert on energy issues.

Copyright 2001. SCIENTECH, Inc. All rights reserved.

  <http://infostore.consultrci.com/spacerdot.gif?IssueAlert=10/22/2001>


Thanks to all of you who have commented already on earlier versions of the
attached white paper.  Remember, this is the message we want to use now as we
are telling various audiences our strategy for the regions.  Please edit on e
mail and send comments back to me by end of day London time Wednesday if
possible.  I am en route to Houston on Wednesday.

I am also recruiting Frank Sayre to help me with the Central America section,
which is weak.

Once I hear from you I'll revise again and send new draft by Thursday.  Who
should be on the next distribution list besides all of you?


---------------------- Forwarded by Angela Barnett/HOU/ECT on 12/13/2000
02:54 PM ---------------------------

Daily-Blessings <dailyblessings.10@lists.postmastergeneral.com> on 12/13/2000
10:25:01 AM
To: ANGELA.BARNETT@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Daily-Blessings 12/13/00

Daily Blessing
Daily Survival Kit
http://www.daily-blessings.com/bless108.htm

Long, Long Ago
http://www.daily-blessings.com/ch20.htm

FlipAlbum is the world's first software that automatically organizes digital
images into realistic page-flipping picture albums. It has everything you
need to organize your digital photos, make powerful presentations, even email
your pictures. For sheer realism, simplicity and elegance, FlipAlbum is
unmatched. Download free.

Click Here:  http://www.onresponse.com/onR_Ads.asp?a=8534&d=1168

Get 50 Dollars IN COUPONS when you Grab the Gator!  Tired of filling out
forms? Tired of forgetting passwords? You need Gator! Gator is free software
that does the typing for you. Gator eliminates frustrating web chores like
filling out forms and remembering passwords. Best of all, it's polite:  When
you hit a web page with a form or account name & password, Gator surfaces to
provide the exact information with no typing! It takes only 3 minutes to
download at 56K! Gator also comes with  in $50 FREE COUPONS!
Click Here:  http://www.onResponse.com/onr_ads.asp?a=8534&d=13

Listen and reply to your email from any phone for free.
Click Here:  http://www.onresponse.com/onR_Ads.asp?a=8534&d=1285

Just in time for the Holidays, win cash instantly!

Enter The Fastfreefun Hat Scratch Fever Sweepstakes for your chance to win
one of our $100 instant win cash prizes.

All you have to do is scratch off the ticket. If three $100 images match, YOU
WIN!

Click Here:  http://www.onresponse.com/onR_Ads.asp?a=8534&d=1177

Win one of four great trips each of them valued at over $13,000!  Enter today!
Click Here:  http://www.onresponse.com/onR_Ads.asp?a=8534&d=1329

<<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>>
* To remove yourself from this mailing list, point your browser to:
http://inbound.postmastergeneral.com/remove?dailyblessings:10
* Enter your email address (ANGELA.BARNETT@enron.com) in the field
provided and click "Unsubscribe". The mailing list ID is "dailyblessings:10".

OR...

* Reply to this message with the word "remove" in the subject line.

This message was sent to address ANGELA.BARNETT@enron.com
X-PMG-Recipient: ANGELA.BARNETT@enron.com
<<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>>


We should have some impact from the following deals 456630, 456638, and
414075.
I increased the price on 414075.

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 10/27/2000 03:32
PM ---------------------------

Chris Germany
10/27/2000 03:32 PM
To: Joann Collins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Alvin Thompson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jeffrey
Porter/HOU/EES@EES, Dave Scott/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Victoria Versen/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Oct buy back

Hey team.

I just created deals 456630 (sale to New Power) and 456638 (buy from New
Power) at the pool.  This is to record the gas ENA is buying back from New
Power when there daily loads drop below the FOM numbers.  I'm using the
following FOM numbers

1st-6th  51,762
7th-26th  41,762  New Power sold back 10,000 dth day 7th-31st
27th-31st 31,762 New Power sold Aquilla 10,000 dth 27th-31st

Using these numbers, ENA is only buying back a total of 164,031dth through
the 25th.  Not as much as I thought.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Espinoza, Veronica
Sent:	Thursday, November 01, 2001 9:14 AM
To:	Anderson, Diane; Bailey, Derek; Baumbach, David; Bell, Jean; Boulanger, Patricia; Brown, Angela Y.; Cisneros, Celeste; Crawford, Sharon; Deming, Richard; Dickson, Melia; Giron, Darron C.; Gossett, Jeffrey C.; Hoang, Charlie; Hunter, Larry Joe; Keiser, Kam; Love, Phillip M.; McLaughlin Jr., Errol; Mendoza, Nidia; Moran, Tom; Moscoso, Mirna; Mulvany, Patrick; Negrete, Flavia; Ornelas, Bianca; Otto, Randy; Pernul, Sarah; Reeves, Leslie; Rohauer, Tanya; Seib, Dianne; Sietzema, Linda; Theriot, Kim S.; Wallumrod, Ellen; Wilder, Wesley
Subject:	Credit Report--11/1/01


Dear Mr. LARRY CAMPBELL:

We have credited your account with $8000.00.

This credit was entered for the following reason:  wire received

Your tracking number for this fund credit is W-000-7573-1137.

Happy Trading!


<title>StoneAge.com - Road To Ownership Status</title>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">

			 Hello again patrice thurston,

We need your help!  You used StoneAge.com a while back to request information on a 2001 Chevrolet Tahoe 4dr LS. We sent your request to one of our accredited
              dealers: Davis Chevrolet in Houston, TX.

Now we want to know if you've bought a car yet, or if there's something more we can do to help you.
			    Your feedback is very important, as it will tell us whether or not we can close this request, and will also help us improve the way we do business in the future.

** Please note that you will not receive a reply if you respond directly
              to this message.

Thank you very much for your feedback and for using StoneAge.com!

Sincerely,

Customer Service

              StoneAge.com

Click here if you do not wish to receive this reminder again.

<map name="Map">
  <area shape="rect" coords="15,4,45,25" href="http://www.stoneage.com" alt="www.stoneage.com" title="www.stoneage.com">
  <area shape="rect" coords="51,5,93,20" href="http://www.stoneage.com/AUTO/FINANCE/" alt="finance" title="finance">
  <area shape="rect" coords="101,5,146,23" href="http://www.stoneage.com/auto/buy/">
  <area shape="rect" coords="155,5,206,17" href="http://www.stoneage.com/mortgage/">
  <area shape="rect" coords="212,5,287,20" href="http://www.stoneage.com/auto/sell/">
  <area shape="rect" coords="290,4,359,16" href="http://www.stoneage.com/auto/own/">
</map>


You have received this email because you are listed as a security approver.
Please click
http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000007592&Page=
Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000007592
Request Create Date : 11/16/00 11:21:08 AM
Requested For       : chris.bowling@enron.com
Resource Name       : EOL US Backoffice  Product Data Manager
Resource Type       : Applications


Sally,

I just saw the announcement and wanted to offer my comgratualtions.  I think
that's great.  I have always admired your leadership and clear thinking.  I'm
glad Enron recognizes your contributions.

Patty


Dave,

Credit Houston received yesterday a partial list of counterparties to whom
this product should be shown. We are still waiting for a final list of
reference credits and are trying to confirm with Credit London that they have
received a list of trading counterparties. Profiles still need to be created
for all trading counterparties based on the products for EOL.

As of this minute, I would say that we have signed off on the concept but
details and individual approvals are not complete. Bill spoke with Bryan last
night and communicated this to him as well.

A Monday launch looks a bit optimistic given the data on hand and tasks left
to do. Being a US holiday for Enron doesn't help either.

Let me know how things progress from your end.

David Forster
02/16/2000 08:46 AM
To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Credit Launch

Credit are pushing to launch online credit trading for this coming Monday.

Have you both "signed off" on the process, or are there issues outstanding
which need to be resolved, from your point of view?

Dave


I spoke yesterday with President Lynch's gas advisor and the PUC staffer who
first got in touch with us regarding inquiries from our customer regarding
whether we were returning customers to the LDCs.
I described our activities generally, and explained that the originial
inquiry from our customer stemmed from a mix-up (on our part) that has since
been cleared up.
Both seemed satisfied, appreciated the call and the information and will get
back to me regarding whether we'll need to submit a formal response to
President Lynch's letter. (I said that our preference was not to respond
formally, but would be happy to do so.)
I asked them to contact me directly should they receive any other inquiries
from our customers.
Thanks to all for the help in responding.
Please keep me in the loop on our marketing activities, etc.
If I hear anything about customers calling the PUC, I'll let you know, and
I'll let you know what I hear back from Lynch's office regarding whether we
need to respond formally.

Best,
Jeff


I know Michael wants to go to your apt this afternoon.  If you do go there,
just give me a call to let me know you're there so we can coordinate pickup.

See you soon,

Kay


Tana:

None of the following CPs are authorized to trade US power (restricted by
credit):

Aquila Risk Management Corporation
FirstEnergy Trading Services, Inc.
Taylor Gas Liquids, Inc,

Leslie


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 09/29/2000
04:58 PM ---------------------------
From: Karla Feldman on 09/27/2000 04:24 PM
To: GemanIX@aol.com@ENRON
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re : Re: Software license

Ms. Geman,

I apologize for the delay, but I finally have drafted an Escrow Agreement for
placing the software in escrow with your attorneys.  Please review and have
your attorneys review and let me know if it is acceptable.

I will be leaving the department I have been working in and moving to a
different Enron subsidiary on October 13.  If at all possible, could we try
to get the Software License Agreement and the Escrow Agreement wrapped up
before I leave so that someone else does not have to try to pick up where I
left off?

I think we are just about in agreement on the Software License portion.
Seems like the only outstanding question had to do with your concern
regarding providing a response time of 2 business days.  I do not have any
answers regarding that - maybe Vince Kaminski or Stinson Gibner can respond
on this issue.

I look forward to hearing from you and trying to get this finalized within
the next 2 weeks if possible.

Thank you,

Karla Feldman
Enron Corp.
(713) 646-7554


To whom it may concern:

I am disappointed by the lack of internet options.  For someone like myself
that lives in an apartment, it looks like it will be impossible to get high
speed internet access.  Perhaps you would consider cutting a deal with OpTel,
since they provide high speed internet access to every apartment in Houston.

Thank you for time,

Andy


My details to Jeff and Sherri
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 10/18/2000 10:41 PM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Sally Beck                           10/18/2000 10:02 PM

To: Jeff Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Sherri Sera/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Agenda and Speaking Points for October 24 Engagement

Thanks in advance for agreeing to speak at the Global Operations Controller
Forum that I am hosting next week.  There will be approximately 30 Enron
business controllers present at the meeting.  All have responsibility for mid
and back office operations for the following Enron entities:  Enron North
America, Enron Europe, Enron South America, Enron Global Markets, Enron
Industrial Markets, Enron Broadband Services and Enron Energy Services.
Attendees will be here from Houston, Calgary, Tokyo, Sydney, London and New
York (metals business).

Attached for your reference is the agenda. There may be some slight changes
before the forum begins, but this will give you a good idea of the topics to
be covered and the other speakers who will address the group.

You are scheduled to address the group as follows:

Date:  Tuesday, October 24, 2000
Time:  8:30 am
  (breakfast will be served at 8:00 and you are invited to join us)
Place:  The Warwick Hotel
  The Versailles Room - 12th Floor
  5701 Main Street
  Houston,  TX  77005

The group would like to hear about Enron's performance, your outlook for the
remainder of 2000 and into 2001, your viewpoint on the future of the company
and next growth opportunities, etc.  With a small group, your talk can be
informal and you do not need to prepare slides (unless you would like to do
so).  Q&A afterwards would be great.  Key speaking points that would enforce
the value of this conference for this group would be:

recognition of a job well done in supporting explosive business growth in
2000

the value you place on the jobs performed by operations controllers to ensure
integrity in mid and back office functions

the importance of tight operational controls in enabling business growth for
Enron (your loose/tight analogy would be great, as many have not heard that)

the independent control role that we play and our responsibility to "raise
the flag" on issues if needed


---------------------- Forwarded by Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT on 02/03/2000
08:04 AM ---------------------------

	Amber Limas
	02/02/2000 05:48 PM

To: CAROL COLEMAN, Regina Blackshear/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Eve
Puckett/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Leslie Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Judy
Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michelle Neville/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shirlet
Williams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amber Ebow/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Shoemake/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: I better get this back!

---------------------- Forwarded by Amber Limas/HOU/ECT on 02/02/2000 05:46
PM ---------------------------

Amber Ebow
02/02/2000 04:31 PM
To: Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amber Limas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Regina
Blackshear/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Michelle Neville/HOU/ECT@ECT,
rjackson@admin4.hsc.uth.tmc.edu, mjpierson@netzero.com, nefjones@hotmail.com,
"Bowden, Neinka S" <nbowden@bcm.tmc.edu>
cc: "Angela Washington" <a-washington1@ti.com>, Shundea Thrower
<shundea.thrower@wcom.com>
Subject: FW: I better get this back!

---------------------- Forwarded by Amber Ebow/HOU/ECT on 02/02/2000 04:27 PM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Bernice Rodriguez                           02/02/2000 04:26 PM

To: Tina Sturm, Angelita Hurd/Houston/Eott@Eott, Ray
Fields/Houston/Eott@Eott, Maria Sandoval/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrea R
Guillen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melba Lozano/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amber Ebow/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel
Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: I better get this back!

---------------------- Forwarded by Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT on 02/02/2000
04:23 PM ---------------------------

	Lisa Berg
	02/02/2000 04:18 PM

To: Cassandra S Dutton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gerri Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary G
Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christy Sweeney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sandra R
McNichols/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cheryl Lantz Marshall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Becky
Caudle/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melba Lozano/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Willie Harrell/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: I better get this back!

>  <<Part.001>>  <<XyWrite III Plus 4.0>>
>

 - Part.001
 - Blueman.jpg


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 05/24/2001 03:58
PM ---------------------------

Dan Lyons@ECT
05/24/2001 03:42 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, rstephens@bracepatt.com
cc:

Subject: Sunday at 7:00

Dinner is 7ish on Sunday...Rob you know how to get there...Kay this will be a
test for your Onstar(registered trademark) System...the address is 510
Crestwood, Houston 77007...if your Onstar(registered trademark) System fails
you the telepone (unlisted) number for rescue is 713.863.8331...no gifts
please...dress is Danjoe casual(and you know what that means)...

Regards to Rob

XOXOXO to Kay


State Roundup: December 2, 1999 ?

	Thoroughly Modern Privacy Problems

?????Even before the federal Financial Services Modernization Act was signed
into law, some state regulators could see signs of trouble. Unsure that the
bill would provide adequate privacy protections for financial records, states
began hashing out the issue, investigating consumer privacy and launching
committees dedicated to exploring options. Those efforts have proven
fruitful. With privacy advocates lamenting the final results in S. 900, the
pressure is seeping into the states to protect personal information. However,
there are precious few that foreshadowed the federal government's game of
catch to the states on the issue of privacy. Now, privacy advocates are
bombarding state capitals, urging them to take action that the federal
government didn't.
?????What didn't happen at the federal level was an opt-in policy for sharing
of consumer information. The legislation, which provided a legal framework
for financial services megamergers, permits banks to share their customers'
information with other businesses, such as brokerages, insurance firms and
telemarketers. To reveal customers' personally-identifiable information with
outside partners, the financial institutions must provide consumers the
opportunity to "opt-out" of the sharing arrangement. This means that bank
customers would need to notify a bank that they are against the disclosure of
their personal information; if they don't alert the bank, their information
would automatically be up for grabs. An amendment, introduced by Sen. Paul
Sarbanes, D-MD, secures the right of states to pass stricter
information-sharing regulations. While privacy advocates are satiated by the
provision, they would have preferred language that required consumers to
opt-in to all information-sharing practices. Now, they hope to see that type
of policy enacted in the states.
	Building A Framework

?????There are a handful of states that already had begun work in the privacy
arena. One is Minnesota, which catapulted itself into the national privacy
spotlight in June when Attorney General Mike Hatch launched an investigation
and lawsuit against U.S. Bank for giving out personal financial information
to a telemarketing company. The telemarketers, after calling customers and
inquiring whether they wanted additional information about bank services,
charged the customers for the services. Hatch alleged that the bank released
the information for $4 million plus commissions, some of which he said were
gained by disclosing deceptive information. Under the settlement, the bank
donated over $2 million to charities around the state and agreed to make
refunds to Minnesota customers who were victims of the scheme. It also
enacted an opt-out policy, among other penalties. Minnesota was one of the
most outspoken opponents of the federal legislation, saying that it "was even
weaker than the settlement we got," according to Hatch's press secretary,
Leslie Sandburg.
?????Consumers Union's David Butler called Minnesota "as proactive as any
state at this point" for their prosecution of U.S. Bank, but added that "this
is still a relatively new debate at the state level."
?????Some observers anticipate that with the passage of the federal "bank
bill," states may become more alert to the issues at hand. "This will force
states to look directly at the issue," said Brett Hester, the National
Governors' Association's economic development policy analyst. John Ryan, of
the Conference of State Bank Supervisors, agreed. "It's a hot issue, an
easily political issue," he said. "You have elected officials who may want to
make an issue out of this." Minnesota, taking advantage of the Sarbanes
amendment, will introduce legislation next session to the tune of protecting
consumer privacy.
?????Also at the fore is Massachusetts' Lieutenant Gov. Jane Swift, R, and
Gov. Paul Cellucci. In a recent speech, Swift railed against the federal
legislation, saying that both Congress and the administration missed out on a
historic opportunity to ensure privacy protections. "Now that the federal
government has determined that states should decide some privacy issues for
their citizens," Swift said, "we in Massachusetts are pleased to be at the
forefront of this crucial national debate." At the crux of the
administration's plan is the establishment of an opt-in system that requires
businesses to seek consumers' consent before they sell or share information.
"Governor Cellucci and I don,t think that this is too much to ask," she
added.
?????The legislation's initiative grew out of a quality-of-life commission
established by the governor. The group determined that privacy was one of the
hottest issues, and from that grew the omnibus legislation that has been sent
to five different legislative hearings and two public hearings, explained
John Ziemba, deputy general counsel and deputy director of the Office of
Consumer Affairs. Most committees are still looking at the legislation, and
will wrap-up their investigations next year, as the Massachusetts legislature
completes its two-year term.
?????While Massachusetts remains one of the few states specifically targeting
financial privacy, a host of others are joining the bandwagon in the hopes of
ensuring consumer protection in other high-tech areas. New York Attorney
General Eliot Spitzer joined the group of state attorneys general upset with
the weak protections in the federal bank bill, but it wasn't the first time
he had entered the arena. He had ushered through a spam bill * allowing
consumers the right to opt-out of receiving unsolicited, bulk e-mail * and a
bill that would prohibit Web site owners from tracking consumer information
unless users consented to the actions, said spokeswoman Christine Pritchard.
Now the focus has turned to reforming the Fair Credit Reporting Act, which,
among other things, would provide consumers the right to receive one free
credit report each year to determine its accuracy. And Spitzer also has
promoted a bill on identity theft, declaring that if a consumer's identity
has been stolen to obtain anything of value, the customer, and not just the
credit card company, is deemed a victim and can seek reimbursement.
	Honing In On The Hot Topics

?????Identity theft, perhaps because of the personal stories that result from
it, is one of the hotter privacy issues in the states, and Arizona is working
on a law making it a crime to steal a personal password. Rep. Jeff
Hatch-Miller, R, who chairs the state's Internet study commission, said that
legislators are just beginning to understand the new level of concern being
raised by citizens with respect to their right to privacy. The group has
established a subcommittee looking into additional privacy legislation that
may be needed with the understanding that the rules must seek a balance
between protecting consumers and businesses alike.
?????"Arizona is a fairly conservative state," Hatch-Miller said. "We're
friendly to business here. To the extent possible, I think we'll promote
private solutions, as we do prefer them to government solutions."
?????Hatch-Miller added that one of the newest areas of concern is
information from customer convenience cards, such as those given out by
grocery stores to determine sale prices, being sold to outside marketers.
California already has seen legislation introduced that would bar the sale of
that information, and its legislature's Joint Task Force on Personal
Information and Privacy continues to look at that, as well as all issues
surrounding privacy. Sen. Jackie Speier, D-San Francisco/San Mateo, is
expected to soon drop a bill complementing the Financial Services
Modernization Act that would prohibit the sharing of personal information
among affiliate companies in different sectors. Although because of the
strong banking lobby and the political difficulties surrounding the issue,
staffers say they still don't know what form the bill will take.
?????That seems to be a familiar refrain in such discussions, as many elected
officials grapple with the growing number of privacy concerns that
technological advances have ushered in. Many legislators looking to the
federal government for guidance on the matter have been thrown an unexpected
duty with the results in the financial services act, but observers say they
will take the ball and run with it. "I think what will happen is you'll see
legislation in areas where there may be problems," predicted Neal Osten,
director of the commerce and communications committee for the National
Conference of State Legislatures. *by Stephanie Lash


Ben,

What are these folks supposed to do for Enron?  I had heard a rumor that we
were looking to hire someone to lobby for us on a success fee basis.  Is this
the same deal?  I know on the international side there were hoops to jump
through before such an engagement could be signed off on.  I'll have to check
to see what the drill is on this side of the street.

Kay

	From:  Ben F Jacoby @ ECT                           02/28/2001 12:18 PM

Sent by: Ben Jacoby@ECT
To: Kay Mann
cc:

Subject: Tripp Scott Proposed Terms of Engagement

Per my earlier e-mail, attached is Tripp Scott's form.
---------------------- Forwarded by Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT on 02/28/2001 12:17 PM
---------------------------

Steven Krimsky@ENRON
02/28/2001 09:11 AM
To: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Tripp Scott Proposed Terms of Engagement

As discussed, Roger has no problem engaging Tripp Scott.  He does want to use
Enron's standard 9 page engagement letter in lieu of the attached 2 pager
received from Tripp Scott.  Is this necessary - any thoughts?

Steve

---------------------- Forwarded by Steven Krimsky/Corp/Enron on 02/28/2001
09:08 AM ---------------------------

Steven Krimsky
02/16/2001 03:44 PM
To: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Roger Balog@ECT, Marchris Robinson/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Tripp Scott Proposed Terms of Engagement

As discussed in Fort Pierce, Tripp Scott is that insurance policy I've been
looking for to help secure the commission vote in Pompano.  Tripp Scott will
also assist us in our door knock campaign in the County & Tallahassee.
Pozzuoli is a mover & shaker and is on a first name basis with Jeb Bush -  he
was the Chairman for the Bush/Cheny Broward County re-count.

Bill Keith & Debbie Orshefsky highly recommends the engagement.

Lets discuss Tuesday.

Steve
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven Krimsky/Corp/Enron on 02/16/2001
03:38 PM ---------------------------

"Edward J. Pozzuoli (Paulette R Segal)" <PRS@trippscott.usa.com> on
02/14/2001 01:56:42 PM
To: steven.krimsky@enron.com
cc: TSCS.TSCS-1.ejp@mail4.allegro.net

Subject: Proposed Terms of Engagement

It was a pleasure meeting with you and Debbie on Monday afternoon.  Per our
discussion, enclosed is Tripp Scott's proposed terms of engagement as well as
an abbreviated description of the firm and its key directors.

I look forward to speaking with you soon.

Ed
 - 239299.WPD
 - 239243.WPD


Jim:

Thank you for your communication advising as to the concern that the IRS
seems to have about non-profits and the internet.  In early February of
this year I filed a form 1023 seeking a tax determination letter for
"Technology For All" a Texas non-profit corporation whose mission it is
to enhance the educational and economic opportunities of the
disadvantaged ("TFA").  TFA has a strong board led by Ken Lay, the CEO
of Enron Corporation.  TFA has assisted its affiliates (all believed to
be tax exempt non profits) in building computer learning centers
("CLC's") where recycled computers and donated software are connected
over the Enron Broadband Network (donated to TFA) to a server farm that
delivers to the disadvantaged at the CLC's educational and other
content.  There are over 75 CLC's in Houston, some 25 in Colorado and we
are building affiliations that will build them across the country and
eventually all over the world.  The business plan for this contemplates
operations in excess of one billion by the end of five years.  However,
we have not yet received our tax determination letter.  We have found
that major contributors require a tax determination letter.

    I received a response from the IRS on May 3, 2000.  On May 11, 2000,
I responded with answers to the inquiries made by the IRS.  Then on June
8 I was advised that our application had been sent to the national
office.  On November 15 I received another letter from the IRS raising
some additional questions unrelated to the first response.  While there
were some that were of substance in the main they were pretty weak.  The
first question was something like "What did we mean by disadvantaged?"

    My question to you is what do you think is best to get this going
and out of the IRS?  Should I ask our board members to use their
considerable political influence tocause the IRS to move this?  Back in
August I had Bill Archer give the Commissioner an invitation to finish
this.  It did not seem to work.  I do not wish for an effort on my part
to cause this to go to the bottom of some bureaucrats stack.     Your
advice would be appreciated.

Regards:

Jack Clark


Rosalie,

Please see attached letter to Mr. Ken Lay for Mr. Kase Lawal.

Thank you

Tommie


okey dokey.  Aren't  you on holiday?


Should I send the book to your location?

Alma Martinez@ENRON
12/28/2000 10:18 AM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re:

My new location is EB4768.  I have a crate.  Thanks for the offer.  I went
home early yesterday and found Stone in the living room carpet.  He was
playing with his toy.  I can be at work today with ease.

Thanks again, Alma


I am on the very last piece of the actualization for October.  TJ and I went through the code for the dollar match-up for the 407 and figured out why it was creating such outrageous dollar amounts.  I have kicked off the month and will wrap it up when I get in tomorrow.

Bottom line:  October will be done early Wednesday

Next:  Start on November

I will be following behind Donna and Kit and actualizing the regular stuff and setting to M as I go.  I will also be running the Deviations through the tool, ensuring that it runs automatically and correctly.

Cross-training for Kit and Donna will follow, or will be part of the November actualization.

Deadline for November is Friday, and I am going to shoot for it.  However, I will not be able to stay past 5:00 as I have to make it to the Chiropractor that day.

Caroline

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Emmert, Caroline
Sent:	Thursday, May 03, 2001 5:13 PM
To:	Stokley, Chris
Cc:	O'Neil, Murray P.; Johnson, Donna
Subject:	FW: Status of Actualizations - October Deviation Preliminaries and Finals, and 'Other' Finals

I spent several hours with TJ shadowing and we tested the 402 code while I examined results.  As each error or incorrect result was noted, we went to the code and walked through and made changes.  TJ is now running actual dates and we will check them in the morning.  When all is well, we will run the rest of October.  Next we will perform the same testing and coding revisions for 405 (only need to test for EPMI-side exceptions) and then we will be able to run 405 for the month.

After the latest unsuccessful run of 403, I delved into the specific details of the variances, and all of the material volumes are included in the Finals, so any allocations that would be created as a result of those variances would be reversed when I run the Final actualization.  So, this morning I manually calculated appropriate allocations for our Load customers (the variances are due to re-submitted meter data), entered the values in the ProRata allocation table, created an additional allocation for the remaining 1.9496MW variance, matched all up to the ISO, and completed 403 for Preliminaries.

I have actualized the regular stuff and set to M through October 27.  I will wrap those up on Friday.

At this point in time we are on target for completion of Prelims by Friday afternoon, but Finals may not be done until Monday.

Caroline
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Emmert, Caroline
Sent:	Wednesday, May 02, 2001 8:29 PM
To:	Stokley, Chris
Cc:	Johnson, Donna; O'Neil, Murray P.
Subject:	FW: Status of Actualizations - October Deviation Preliminaries and Finals, and 'Other' Finals

Anna and I worked through the coding for 403 and she made some changes to the method for finding percent usage.  I reran the tool and looked at the results and we still do not have valid allocations.  On October 1, we now have an 877MW difference between the variance and the amount allocated.  Will look into it again tomorrow.

402 is nearly complete.  Ran into an error while running a test day, and I will discuss it with TJ tomorrow.  405 should be a quick fix once we get the 402 exceptions working properly.

I have actualized finals on the regular charges through October 23, and should be able to wrap up most, if not all, of the rest tomorrow.

If we can get them working properly tomorrow, then I will be able to finish the Prelims on Friday, and the Finals on Monday.

Caroline

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Emmert, Caroline
Sent:	Tuesday, May 01, 2001 5:04 PM
To:	Stokley, Chris; Johnson, Donna
Subject:	Status of Actualizations - October Deviation Preliminaries and Finals, and 'Other' Finals

Exception handling coding changes are nearly complete.  TJ had to weave through the code for 402 all the way, as well as add 3 new function points: EPMI exceptions, ISO exceptions, and repeating (scavenging, he calls it) the exception roll up function from another module.  He has a test environment set up and is testing EPMI variance allocations, EPMI exceptions and ISO exceptions.  He has not yet done the 'scavenging' part.  He will be finished with 402 tonight, and tomorrow I will test the results on one of the days where I had samples of these exceptions.

The part of 405 that needs to be changed is for EPMI exception handling, which should be a much less involved endeavor.

For 403, I attempted to follow all of the queries through to see if I could run some tests within the environment and determine what was being pulled as a variance, and how that variance was being allocated.  However, these queries are currently beyond my expertise (I plan to rectify that).  We are going to enlist Anna's help as much as possible for 403, and get to the bottom of what is happening.  As a side note, for the time change date, we have an extra HE 2, and the ISO has HE 25.  We are also going to get with Anna on how to resolve that.

For the regular actualizations, I have set 10/1 - 10/18 (except 10/16) to M today.  There is a strange anomaly going on on the 16th, and neither Donna nor I could figure out what.  I will get back to it.

Anticipate completion of all by Monday, May 7.

Caroline

__________________________________________________________________________________________________
To:	Chris Stokley/ENRON@enronXgate, Donna Johnson/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:
Subject:	Status of Actualizations - October Deviation Preliminaries and 'Other' Finals

Exception handling in 402 and 405 not coded properly.   Tj working on enhancing the codes to handle them correctly, and anticipates being done with 402 by tomorrow afternoon, and 405 by mid-day Wednesday.

Final actualizations for the regular charge codes are complete and set to M through October 10.

Will perform additional research into the improper allocations for 403 on Tuesday.  The unallocated volume on 10/1 is approx 300MW, so I will focus my research on that day.

Estimate completion date of all (deviations, prelim and final, and regular charge codes, final) Monday, May 7.

Caroline

---------------------- Forwarded by Caroline Emmert/HOU/ECT on 04/30/2001 06:44 PM ---------------------------
To:	Chris Stokley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna Johnson/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:	Status of Deviation Actualizations - October Preliminaries

I have started the actualization process with 403 Load Deviation, and need to work closely with TJ on Monday to find out why the allocations don't match the variances.  I have isolated one day, zone and hour and will work on that with him.  We have got to get it working properly, or else there will be a lot of manual work required.

404 Export Deviation is complete for October, and the records can be set to A with the other days as normal.

405 Import Deviation needs the new calcs that will be provided by a re-run of SettleSupplemental, which I am going to kick off just before I leave.  I will run that on Monday while TJ is researching the 403 errors/problems.

402 Gen Deviation will also be started on Monday.

Tentative target date for completion of Prelim's is next Thursday, and Finals on Friday.

See you Monday.

Caroline


Please send John and I a copy of our final presentation.

Thanks
Louise


Dad,
Please find attached Krista's resume.  Joe Hillings has received and
responded and is circulating among the D.C. group. If you have any
suggestions let me know. Love,
Me
---------------------- Forwarded by Elizabeth Lay/HOU/AZURIX on 11/16/99
05:45 AM ---------------------------

From:  Krista Kisch                           11/15/99 08:57 AM

To: Elizabeth Lay/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX
cc: kkisch8709@aol.com

Subject: Job Search


---------------------- Forwarded by Don Miller/HOU/ECT on 08/27/2000 07:47 AM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Ron Coker @ ENRON                           08/27/2000 07:36 AM

To: Andrew Kelemen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Fillinger/SF/ECT@ECT, Samuel
Wehn/HOU/ECT@ECT, wcheng8962@yahoo.com, Vicky Ha/SF/ECT@ECT, Gauri Sohoni
Khokha/SF/ECT@ECT, Dean Russell/SF/ECT@ECT, Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric
Thode/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rob Bakondy/SF/ECT@ECT, David Leboe/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Roger Ondreko/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES, Karen E
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Don.miller@enron.com, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Benjamin
Rogers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jinsung Myung/Corp/Enron@Enron, aykelemen@dellnet.com,
Mike J Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT
cc: Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT
Subject: Urgent - Response Required 8/28/00 - Pastoria Information Memorandum
- Draft 8/27/00

Attached is another redlined draft of the Pastoria IM.  It is much more close
to completion because it now includes comments from all necessary parties.

Please carefully review and send me any changes no later than Monday.  If you
send them today (Sunday) send them via e-mail.  Beginning Monday (12 PM CDT)
I'll be in SF, so if you fax them send them to 415.782.7827.

Please call me at 713.629.0929 or 713.398.6412 should you have any
questions.  Thanks.

PS  for Dave Parquet:  Not all of your proposed changes were made simply
because I could not ready many of them and the changes were too late at night
to call you.  I was asked to get a draft out ASAP so I will call you today
(Sunday) to discuss them.


Not me.
Jane
Ps. Won't make it to the Legal Conference this time unfortunately - have fun!

	Tana Jones@ECT
	2001/04/24 07:56

		 To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marcus
Nettelton/NA/Enron@ENRON, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Marie Heard/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Robbi Rossi/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, John Viverito/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jane McBride/AP/Enron@Enron,
Andrea Calo/SA/Enron@Enron, Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT, Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: PG&E Energy Trading Entities

Please let me know immediately if you have any issues with the PG&E entities
at the bottom of this email trading the listed products.
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 04/23/2001 05:55 PM -----

	Walter Guidroz/ENRON@enronXgate
	04/23/2001 05:35 PM

		 To: Lisa Lees/ENRON@enronXgate, Stephanie Sever/ENRON@enronXgate, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: PG&E Energy Trading Entities

Lisa/Stephanie, could you please ensure that the trading profiles for each of
the three PG&E entities are changed below such that by tomorrow morning they
will be able to transact once we restore their headroom once we enter it into
the system?

Tana, are you OK with restoring the changes reflected below?  I'm thinking
that since they had this transact ability once before, that it should be OK.

PLEASE LET ME KNOW IF THERE WILL BE ANY PROBLEMS.

Thanks all!

Walter

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Moran, Tom
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 5:08 PM
To: Guidroz, Walter
Subject: FW: PG&E Energy Trading Entities

Walter,

Could you ensure that the profiles are set-up accordingly and that CAS is
populated with a $5million minimum for each of these cp,s.

I do not want to turn them on in Datamanager until tomorrow am.

tm

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Conwell, Wendy
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 4:59 PM
To: Moran, Tom
Cc: Bradford, William S.; Ngo, Tracy; Sacks, Edward; Radous, Paul
Subject: PG&E Energy Trading Entities

Tom,

Per our discussion with Bill, please set up the following PG&E counterparties
on EOL providing for transactions having a maximum tenor of 12 MONTHS:

PG&E Energy Trading - Power L.P.-------> Physical Power
PG&E Energy Trading, Canada Corporation---------> Physical Canadian Gas
PG&E Energy Trading - Gas Corporation---------->Physical and Financial US Gas

Thanks,
Wendy


Attached are the execution copies of the Turbo Park documents that are
relevant to power plant equipment procurement and development.   I have asked
Finance to provide us with summaries of the relevant provisions since the
120+ page Participation Agreement, which is largely a loan agreement, is very
complex.  I will nevertheless attempt to summarize the "process" of getting
into and out of TurboPark.  In the meantime, please familiarize yourselves
with the documents.


5 bedrooms for a millsky?

To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re:

great man...we just lifted a new pad too this past weekend...Bunker Hill
area...sweet

fletch


Misha, I haven't yet received the details about the lunch on the 28th.  I'm out on vacation the end of next week, so I wanted to try to fill it early next week.  Could you forward me the invitation or details?  Thanks.  MHC


Can you please put this counterparty in profile manager for me.  We had a
really old ERMS Master that restricted the types of financial products they
could trade under it, and I want to take a look and see what we've got them
approved for.  They should be able to trade any financial products now.
Thanks!


Facilities Help Desk, please provide a standing order of  ten (10) stacking chairs for ECN-1336 every Monday afternoon, 1:00p - 4:00p.  We will need this request filled through January 31, 2002.

Please send me some type of confirmation.

Thanks in advance for your assistance,

adr

Audrey D. Robertson
Transwestern Pipeline Company
email address:  audrey.robertson@enron.com
(713) 853-5849
(713) 646-2551 Fax


Enron in Action can be accessed through the new Community Relations web site at http://cr.enron.com/eia.html .  In this week's issue you will find out information regarding:

Enron Happenings
Museum of Fine Arts, Houston 2001 - 2002 Membership Drive
Plant Sale
2001 MS Walk
Energize Houston Charitable Golf Tournament
The College Fund/UNCF Walk-A-Thon

Wellness
Blood Drive

In addition, Enron in Action is available through a channel on my.home.enron.com.  To add this channel to your set-up click on the channels link at the top of the screen and under announcements check the Enron in Action box.

If you wish to add an announcement to Enron in Action, please fill out the attached form below and submit it to mailto:eia@enron.com no later than 12 PM Thursday each week.


---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Neal/HOU/ECT on 09/14/2000 05:33 PM
---------------------------

<peterc@huddlestonco.com> on 09/14/2000 02:27:11 PM
To: mmartin@cmdrealty.com, mrupe@cima-energy.com, peterc@huddlestonco.com,
texican@texicannaturalgas.com, support@iteam.com, clarsen@pdq.net,
ranchbubba@aol.com, ahb@pdq.net, landjread@compuserve.com, COP77777@aol.com,
AABAUER@AOL.COM, CSSKE@GATEWAY.NET, michaelcokinos@compuserve.com,
jane@rensimer.com, TEXAG1983@AOL.COM, Diego556@aol.com, CPSelzer@aol.com,
CPSelzer@aol.com, michaelcokinos@compuserve.com, rebec_1@msn.com,
sjh155@hotmail.com, meldwawg@msn.com, wallacej@dellnet.com,
mariegary@pdq.net, ranchbubba@aol.com, support@iteam.com, willj206@aol.com,
twwren@msn.com, rgregory@bracepatt.com, texican@texicannaturalgas.com,
bcdaw@swbell.net, KClerkley@WestsidePropertiesInc.com, HBELTRAN@EV1.NET,
codyjb@evg.net, caron@starcomglobal.com, wdh@coastalsecurities.com,
MasterDave27@aol.com, margojanec@aol.com, B74blades@aol.com,
karen.erhardt@hcahealthcare.com, Tzay418@cs.com, cberg1800@aol.com,
eltres@ev1.net, scaton@houston.rr.com, TTCRB@aol.com, patricktgreen@msn.com,
rgregory@bracepatt.com, ldeere@pdq.net, makill33@aol.com, bower1961@aol.com,
rogerf@pioneercontract.com, bkinser@ev1.net, lincar@webtv.net,
kim.hurt@apachecorp.com, seacraft@mail.ev1.net, McConkeyscott@aol.com,
cmwalker61@aol.com, support@iteam.com, jschwarz@flash.net, support@iteam.com,
lrichie@houston.camco.slb.com, marshall_heins@mhhs.org,
thereesehouse@pdq.net, support@iteam.com, mbreakey@pmet.com,
supermangene@AOL.com, makill33@aol.com, wjwstone@aol.com,
rreichert@nfl2002.com, rreichert@nfl2002.com, mlrs@swbell.net,
Agreggoftexas@aol.com, bushongsc@c-b.com, InfiniteCavalier@aol.com,
markj@woodwardmarketing.com, crcolyer@aol.com, RMAGEE5809@AOL.COM,
jack.calkins@compaq.com, vickie_anderson@huntsman.com,
jennifer.bowman@marchfirst.com, jbdunbar1@aol.com, RWASBA@aol.com,
sewbibbins@mailcity.com, hcchris@ibm.net, hcchris@ibm.net, RWASBA@aol.com,
none@na.com, butch@watsonmoving.com, digiman28@aol.com,
kay_mitchell@hotmail.com, DBennyDad@aol.com, robin99tim@yahoo.com,
sneal@enron.com, GeorgeR@RangerAmericanSecurity, rkgbh@aol.com,
KbutchW@aol.com, Catho928@aol.com, murphyg@mercersales.com,
DBennyDad@aol.com, jdaghorn@aol.com, Mrreemus@aol.com, aharrison@aglife.com,
peggy01@ev1.net, kingb@nuevoenergy.com, BBURGE@FLASH.NET, EGwydir@aol.com,
tdpatton00@yahoo.com, willbaird@mindspring.com, jhorner@bracepatt.com,
germex@aol.com, smr@pinnacletrust.com, carlosjoanie@pdq.net,
shannonjeff@msn.com, jrobrien@bopc.com, dcelliott@ev1.net, ELawal@aol.com,
michaelk@aztecpartyandtentrentals.com, jeb.bashaw@painewebber.com,
JulSias@aol.com, willbaird@mindspring.com, KEENERGILL@AOL.COM,
LHStubbs@aol.com, bwanger@gateway.net, burkett@petris.com,
sclandry@prodigy.net, suprman@texas.net
cc:
Subject: Opening Day Celebration

Players, Parents and Family Members:

Saturday, September 16, 2000 it the Opening Season Celebration for SBMSA
Millennium Season 2000!  The day Kicks-off at 9:00 AM and will continue
all day with the last game starting around 4:30 PM.  This day promises to
be a fun filled event.

The Football League is very excited about showing off our upgraded
facility.  We have added new bleachers, picnic tables, flagpole,
landscaping, filming towers and a new concession stand with a bulletin
board.  In honor of this celebration, the league will be selling grilled
hamburgers, hotdogs, chips and cotton candy, as well as usual concessions.
Commemorative Millennium Season 2000 T-shirts will be on sale for $12.00.
These shirts will include both flag and tackle team names on the back.
Don,t be left out, get your T-shirt early.

Season Programs will be on sale for $3.00.  The program includes each team
,s roster listing the players, name, jersey number and school.  The
program will also have each team,s season schedule.  These programs will
be useful for the entire season.  To help defer the $3.00 price,
Fuddrucker's has included a 10% discount card with each program good
throughout the football season.  We also thank Diamond Kuts and Sports
Clips for their advertisements.

Players, now is your chance to get back at your coaches.  There will be
Dunking Booths with each Team,s coaches taking their turn to be your
target.  Come by for a chance to throw the football and send them under.
Your coaches will be in the Dunking Booths following your game.  Please
plan to stick around for an additional hour following your game.  This
will allow you to enjoy all of these activities as well as watching your
opponents play.

All proceeds from the days activities will be used exclusively for the
SBMSA Football Program.  Contact your Coaches if you have any questions.

Looking forward to the new season!

SBMSA Football Board