Start Date: 1/31/02; HourAhead hour: 10;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002013110.txt


This request has been pending your approval for  35 days.  Please click http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000057285&Page=Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000057285
Request Create Date : 8/30/01 5:59:30 PM
Requested For       : erik.simpson@enron.com
Resource Name       : Market Data Kobra Power
Resource Type       : Applications


What is wrong with these people?  Who faxes?
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/09/2001 07:52
PM ---------------------------

"DeBerry, Jeremiah A." <JeremiahDeberry@paulhastings.com> on 04/09/2001
07:42:46 PM
To: "'Kay.Mann@Enron.com'" <Kay.Mann@Enron.com>, "'JKeffer@KSlaw.com'"
<JKeffer@KSlaw.com>
cc: "'Michael.Young@NorthWestern.com'" <Michael.Young@NorthWestern.com>,
"Kahn, Marguerite R." <MargueriteKahn@paulhastings.com>

Subject: Comments to Turbine Purchase Documents

We have forwarded to you via facsimile our comments to the Letter Agreement
and the LLC Agreement. The majority of our comments, as you will note, are
intended to clarify the understanding of the parties with respect to the
various matters set forth in such documents and are not intended to "change
the deal". Except that, upon the advise of our tax counsel, we have adjusted
the amounts of the promissory notes to be issued in connection with the
transaction in order to maximize the LLC,s basis in the Turbines. We believe
this is consistent with your initial draft of the Letter Agreement.
Also, please note that we have included additional language in Section 6 of
the Letter Agreement which provides NorthWestern with the opportunity to
consult with GE on matters relating to the Turbines. This reflects our
understanding of an agreement that had been reached among the parties.
With respect to the LLC Agreement, we would like to discuss with you the
following: (i) the timing of the exercise of the Call Right and (ii) the
intent of your proposed language in Section 7 relating to the rights of each
Member to act in its own best interests with respect to the Call and Put
Rights.  To that end, we propose scheduling a conference call on Tuesday
afternoon, April 11, 2001.  Please contact me as soon as possible with a time
that is convenient for your team.
We look forward to hearing from you.
Note: We will forward to you shortly, revised drafts of the documents for
which we have drafting responsibility.
************************************************
Jeremiah A. DeBerry, Esq.
Paul Hastings Janofsky & Walker LLP
399 Park Avenue
New York, New York 10022
Phone: (212) 318-6458
Fax:     (212) 319-4090

"paulhastings.com" made the following annotations on 04/09/01 20:42:52
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NEW E-MAIL ADDRESSES AT PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP

We have changed our e-mail address. Our new domain name is paulhastings.com.
In most cases, our address is composed of conventional first name and last
name plus @paulhastings.com. Here are two examples:
janesmith@paulhastings.com and danjones@paulhastings.com. If you have any
questions, please contact us at noc@paulhastings.com.

==============================================================================
"The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received
this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from all
computers."

==============================================================================


Greg,

FYI,  This is a draft org announcement to clarify Jay's and now Alan's role.
We have discussed this before but I think this is important to send out and
officially address.  It is intentionally very brief and informs people of the
new situation.  Please let me know if you have any comments,  I would like to
send out this week.

Thanks,
Mike

At Enron Net Works, it has become clear that we have a tremendous opportunity
to utilize our unique strengths, skills and new business efforts across an
entire new set of opportunities being created in the private equity markets.
Because of this, we have reorganized the Enron Net Works Investments Group
with the view to leveraging the group better across strategic opportunities
in the eCommerce and technology space, and within Enron.

Effective immediately, Jay Fitzgerald will take responsibility for setting
ENW,s investment strategy and the implementation of that strategy.  Reporting
to him in this new role will be Steve Horn and the venture investing group.
Further, Alan Sommer will be joining Jay,s team to focus on developing new
market opportunities, with a focus on working with the various domestic and
international Enron business units to develop eCommerce-related businesses
and strategies.

Jay will be relocating to New York city and will be working both out of the
New York and Houston offices in his new role, and can be reached at
jay@enron.com or by phone at either (212) 702-3934 or (713) 853-9914.


For April,

We agree to nominate 60,000 into Eastrans.  With redeliveries of:   50,000
into PG&E
            7,800 into HPL at Fuels Cotton Valley
             2,200 to HPL at Carthage

Pricing for any additional volumes will need to be renegotiated.

You may contact either myself or Stacey Neuweiler.

"Bruce McMills" <bmcmills@duke-energy.com> on 03/27/2000 09:10:15 AM
To: dfarmer@enron.com, briley@enron.com, stacey.neuweiler@enron.com
cc: "William E. Speckels" <WESPECKELS@duke-energy.com>, "Chad W. Cass"
<CWCASS@duke-energy.com>, "Donna C. Spencer" <dcspencer@duke-energy.com>,
"Sharon Beemer" <sbeemer@duke-energy.com>, "Michael R. Cherry"
<mrcherry@duke-energy.com>, "Darrel F. Bane" <dfbane@duke-energy.com>, "Jim
I. Fields" <jifields@duke-energy.com>
Subject: Nominations for rest of April 1

Effective 4/1/2000:

Nomination into Eastrans of 75,000 MMBtu/d.

Redeliveries:

50,000 MMBtu/d into PG & E
7,800 from Fuels Cotton Valley
17,200 to HPL at Carthage

Currently, since 3/22/2000, we have been at 75,000
with the following redeliveries:

43,482 MMBtu/d into PG & E
7,000 from Fuels Cotton Valley
3,000 into HPL Cartwheel
21,518 to Mobil Beaumont

I previously showed 44,382 MMBtu/d since 3/22 .  Is 43,482 right?

There is no change in deliveries and redeliveries for tomorrow, but
could someone clarify what the nominations are on the redelivery side?


- 2-6-2002.xls


Attached is new draft with alternative language for Transportation Capacity
Credit section.  Enron MW trading is not comfortable with the Gas Daily
posting as the value determinant.  We would prefer to base the value on
actual transactions (I believe PGL already has audit rights).

Russell Murrell
(312) 541-1159


Following please find the Daily EnronOnline Executive Summary.

<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>


Start Date: 3/6/01; HourAhead hour: 18;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001030618.txt


The attached name change was made in GCP today.  Andersen Consulting LLP to
Accenture LLP.  Short name changes will be made next Friday, January 12, 2001.


o.k. Thanks.......on Diana's deal at first the total was 400 in
enpower......o.k. go figure....it's Friday!  hip hip hooray!!

   Kate Symes @ ECT                02/23/2001 03:14 PM

To: Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: 2/23 Checkout

All Matt Motley's deal JUST went in, so you should see those coming through.

Chris Mallory checked with Prebon - this is a sale - it's been changed.

Diana checked Bloomberg - they show 25 mw and so do we for a total of 800
mw....??

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
02/23/2001 01:12 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: 2/23 Checkout

AMEREX
All deals checked out fine.

PREBON WEST

Matt Motley
I am missing the following deals:

Enron sells Reliant 50 mw of Q3 PV at $375
Enron buys Reliant 50 mw of Q3 SP-15 at $300
Enron sells Williams 25 mw of April SP-15 at $203
Enron sells El Paso 25 mw of June PV at $260
Enron sells Williams 25 mw of March Mid-C at $255

Chris Mallory
deal 530108
Prebon shows Enron as seller not buyer

BLOOMBERG

Diana Scholtes
deal 530260
Bloomberg shows 800 total mw....we show 400 total mw...

Thanks!


Yes, but we are consistenly being OOMC'd,  so it's kind of an ongoing question.
Thanks,
JMF

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Patterson, Mark" <mpatterson@testmail.ercot.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, October 30, 2001 1:18 PM
To:	Forney, John M.
Subject:	RE: OOMC  Capacity Payments

If you are referring to the OOMC for September 14th we are still working
on a number of issues pertaining to that trade day.

-----Original Message-----
From: Forney, John M. [mailto:John.M.Forney@ENRON.com]
Sent: Friday, October 12, 2001 11:27 AM
To: Mark Patterson (E-mail)
Cc: Jerry Watson (E-mail)
Subject: OOMC Capacity Payments

Mark,
Thanks for your reply concerning ancillary service procurement.    I was
wondering if Ercot had made a decision on OOM capacity payments.
Our position is that our custmers,  ie.   Teco/Frontera   should recover
at least their O&M expenses for the capacity,  as they are standing by
awaiting instruction.

Has there been any progress in this subject?

JForney

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient
(or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender
or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and
delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments
hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not
create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron
Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other
party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by
estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


pls print with attachments.  thanks. df
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 01/21/2000
04:51 PM ---------------------------

Janet Butler
01/21/2000 04:13 PM
To: Tim Aron/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, John Ballentine/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Martha
Benner/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Eric Benson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Donna
Bily/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Lynn Blair/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rob
Bradley/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lorna Brennan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bob
Chandler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bill Cordes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Shelley
Corman/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Larry DeRoin/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Rick
Dietz/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dari Dornan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, John
Dushinske/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Diane Eckels/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, George
Fastuca/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Donna
Fulton/Corp/Enron, John Goodpasture/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Bob M Hall/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Mary Lou Hamilton/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven
Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Glen Hass/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Robert
Hayes/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Bambi
Heckerman/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Theresa Hess/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Robert
Hill/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Staci Holtzman/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Tamara
Hopkins/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron, Lee
Huber/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Martha Janousek/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven
January/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Anne Jolibois/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Steven J
Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Jeffrey Keeler/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robert
Kilmer/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Frazier King/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Steve
Kirk/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Tim Kissner/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Laura
Lantefield/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Linda L Lawrence/HOU/EES@EES, Blair
Lichtenwalter/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Elizabeth Linnell/HOU/EES@EES, Teb
Lokey/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Maryann Long/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Phil
Lowry/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Donna
Martens/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dorothy McCoppin/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Mike
McGowan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rockford Meyer/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay
Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michael Moran/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Laura
Moseley/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Sheila Nacey/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ray
Neppl/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Robert
Neustaedter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Christi L
Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Zelda Paschal/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Geneva
Patterson/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Maria Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Eileen
Peebles/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Keith Petersen/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Peggy
Phillips/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Janet Place/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Tony
Pryor/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Colleen Raker/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kathy
Ringblom/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Cynthia Sandherr/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James
Saunders/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Donna Scott/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Susan
Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Michael
Smith/Enron@Gateway, Dave Schafer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mike G
Smith/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Louis Soldano/ET&S/Enron@ENRON,
Lon Stanton/ET&S/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, James
Studebaker/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Jim Talcott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Gina
Taylor/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Debbie Thompson/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Melinda
Tosoni/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michael Van Norden/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Stephen
Veatch/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Donald Vignaroli/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jody
Warner/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Kimberly Watson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Julia
White/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kim Wilkie/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jane
Wilson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Michele
Winckowski/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Weekly Regulatory Report

Attached is the Weekly Regulatory Report for week ending January 21, 2000.
The Commission agenda and two orders are also attached that may be of
interest to you.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------
W E E K E N D   S Y S T E M S   A V A I L A B I L I T Y

F O R

May 4, 2001 5:00pm through May 7, 2001 12:00am
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------

SCHEDULED SYSTEM OUTAGES:

ARDMORE DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

AZURIX: No Scheduled Outages.

EB34 DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

EDI SERVER: No Scheduled Outages.

ENRON CENTER SOUTH DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages

ENRON NORTH AMERICAN LANS:     SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

FIELD SERVICES:  No Scheduled Outages.

INTERNET: No Scheduled Outages.

MESSAGING:     SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

MARKET DATA: No Scheduled Outages.

NT: No Scheduled Outages.

OS/2:  No Scheduled Outages.

OTHER SYSTEMS:       ALSO SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

Impact:  EBS
Time:  Fri 5/4/2001 at  6:00:00 PM CT thru Fri 5/4/2001 at  10:00:00 PM CT
 Fri 5/4/2001 at  4:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 5/4/2001 at    8:00:00 PM PT
 Sat 5/5/2001 at 12:00:00 AM London thru Sat 5/5/2001 at  4:00:00 AM London
Outage:  CGMP removal on MSFCs (EBS)
Environments Impacted:  EBS
Purpose: Possible fix for multicast problems. Neal Symms is still reporting
difficulties with multicast and Tibco.
Backout: Place 'ip cgmp' back on the interfaces
Contact(s):  Dennis McGough    713-345-3143

SITARA:  No Scheduled Outages.

SUN/OSS SYSTEM: No Scheduled Outages.

TELEPHONY: No Scheduled Outages

TERMINAL SERVER:  No Scheduled Outages.

UNIFY:  No Scheduled Outages.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------
        FOR ASSISTANCE

(713) 853-1411   Enron Resolution Center

Specific Help:
Information Risk Management   (713) 853-5536
SAP/ISC
        (713) 345-4727
Unify On-Call      (713) 284-3757  [Pager]
Sitara On-Call     (713) 288-0101  [Pager]
RUS/GOPS/GeoTools/APRS   (713) 639-9726  [Pager]
OSS/UA4/TARP    (713) 285-3165  [Pager]
CPR      (713) 284-4175  [Pager]
EDI Support      (713) 327-3893  [Pager]
EES Help Desk     (713)853-9797 OR (888)853-9797


Sounds like the trip was AMAAAAZING!!!.  Laura should seriously consider
writing for Conde Naste.

I think the best quote was  "The next morning Ryan and I were so confused
about what had taken place the night before."


We are definately going skiing this winter.  We have not been for over two
years.  I also want the kids to start skiing.  Send all of your sisters if
you have them.  I'll put them in my address book and won't have to keep
bugging you.  Take care.

DG

"Sean Mayers" <smmayers@earthlink.net> on 08/03/2000 10:27:00 AM
To: "Darron C Giron" <Darron.C.Giron@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Re: November

Darron,

My dad's email is jcmayers@earthlink.net and which one of my sisters did you
want?

Everything is great here.  You guys really need to come here and enjoy the
scenery.  Maybe we can all go skiing or something.

Good hearing from you and take care.  I have to get to work.

Sean
----- Original Message -----
From: "Darron C Giron" <Darron.C.Giron@enron.com>
To: <smmayers@earthlink.net>
Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2000 7:36 AM
Subject: November

>
>
> Sean,
>
> How's CO?  I hope you are doing well.  I know I have asked you before, but
I
> seem to have accidentally deleted your dad and sister's email addresses.
I want
> to ask you dad if he will be in town when KU plays Texas later in
November.  I
> want to bring the whole family.  If you get a chance, shoot me a message
with
> his info.  My mom is vacationing in NY so I can't ask her.  Thanks.
>
> DG
>
>
>


Ken,

It has been a pleasure serving on the Diversity Task Force for Enron and
sharing in your vision for all employees.  My membership on the team is being
transferred to someone else within our organization.  I trust that many of
the Diversity Action Steps  will be implemented and accomplished this year.

Thanks again,

Daler


_________________________________________________________________

WEEKEND SYSTEMS AVAILABILITY

FOR

1/4/2002 5:00:00 PM through 1/7/2002 12:00:00 AM
_________________________________________________________________
SCHEDULED SYSTEM OUTAGES:

ARDMORE DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS:

Impact: Corp
Time: Sat 1/5/2002 2:00:00 PM CT thru Sat 1/5/2002 3:00:00 PM CT
Sat 1/5/2002 12:00:00 PM PT thru Sat 1/5/2002 1:00:00 PM PT
Sat 1/5/2002 8:00:00 PM London thru Sat 1/5/2002 9:00:00 PM London
Outage: SysAdmiral Fault Tolerance Split for Netco/Estate
Environments Impacted: The outage the sysAdmiral Application will be brief and should not directly affect any applications.
Purpose: We are Splitting the sysAdmiral Fault Tolerance Databases and Master Services on NAHOU-BPMS01P and NAHOU-BPMSFT01P. NAHOU-BPMS01P Database/Master will be used for Estate Scheduling needs and NAHOU-BPMSFT01P will be used for Netco Scheduling Needs. After the environments are split their will be no more replication between the two servers or Fault Tolerance.
Backout: ReEnable Fault Tolernace.
Contact(s): Brennan, Ryan 713-853-4545
Lindsay, Brian 713-853-6225

AZURIX: No Scheduled Outages.

EB34 DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

EDI:  No Scheduled Outages

EES: No Scheduled Outages

ENRON CENTER SOUTH DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages

ENRON NORTH AMERICAN LANS:  No Scheduled Outages

FIELD SERVICES:  No Scheduled Outages.

INTERNET: No Scheduled Outages.

MESSAGING: No Scheduled Outages.

MARKET DATA: No Scheduled Outages.

NT: No Scheduled Outages.

OS/2:  No Scheduled Outages.

OTHER SYSTEMS: No Scheduled Outages.

SITARA:  No Scheduled Outages.

SUN/OSS SYSTEM: No Scheduled Outages.

TELEPHONY: No Scheduled Outages

TERMINAL SERVER:  No Scheduled Outages.

UNIFY:  No Scheduled Outages.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
								FOR ASSISTANCE

(713) 853-1411   Enron Resolution Center

Specific Help:
Information Risk Management			(713) 853-5536
SAP/ISC                                                                               (713) 345-4727
Unify On-Call 					(713) 284-3757  [Pager]
Sitara On-Call					(713) 288-0101  [Pager]
RUS/GOPS/GeoTools/APRS			(713) 639-9726  [Pager]
OSS/UA4/TARP				(713) 285-3165  [Pager]
CPR						(713) 284-4175  [Pager]
EDI Support 					(713) 327-3893  [Pager]
EES Help Desk					(713)853-9797 OR (888)853-9797
TDS -Trader Decision Support On-Call                    (713) 327-6032 [Pager]


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Legler, Michael J.
Sent:	Monday, November 12, 2001 4:43 PM
To:	Schwieger, Jim; Gomez, Julie A.; Meyer, Chris
Subject:	FW: Enron Board of Directors

>
>
>
>  - Enron Board of Directors.pps <<Enron Board of Directors.pps>>
>
>
 - Enron Board of Directors.pps


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/10/2001 11:57
AM ---------------------------

Kay Mann
04/06/2001 11:25 AM
To: Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Pegasus: ENA Consent and Legal Opinion

I would really appreciate your advice.  I have to learn it somehow, and I
know that you have an excellent idea of what works.

Thanks,

Kay

From: Sheila Tweed@ECT on 04/06/2001 11:22 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Pegasus: ENA Consent and Legal Opinion

Mark is the signer of opinions and I know what he will sign and what he
won't, so I'll be glad to help you through it but it's

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	04/06/2001 10:47 AM

		 To: Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Pegasus: ENA Consent and Legal Opinion

They have a financing out in the letter agreement.  We have to use
commercially reasonable efforts to deliver GE consents, but I don't recall
anything about in other financing docs.

Is someone in the dept designated as the opinion reviewer?

Kay

From: Sheila Tweed@ECT on 04/06/2001 10:19 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Pegasus: ENA Consent and Legal Opinion

I guess I'm not sure I know what's in the letter agreement.  If it's a done
deal, I'd say no or at least maybe.  We only give due authority opinions and
we try to narrow our obligations to lenders under Consent Agreements

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	04/06/2001 09:15 AM

		 To: Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Pegasus: ENA Consent and Legal Opinion

Nice touch, sending this the day after the letter agreement was signed.  Can
you enlighten me on the ENA procedures and sensitivities to these types of
docs?

Thanks,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/06/2001 09:14
AM ---------------------------

"PARKER, Isabel" <isabel.parker@freshfields.com> on 04/06/2001 09:07:25 AM
To: "Carolyn Campbell (E-mail)" <CCampbell@KSLAW.com>, "John Keffer (E-mail)"
<JKeffer@KSLAW.com>, "Kay Mann (E-mail)" <kay.mann@enron.com>, "Rick Vicens
(E-mail)" <rvicens@deltapower.com>, "Gregory F. Lang (E-mail)"
<gregorylang@paulhastings.com>
cc: "John Tisdale (E-mail)" <jtisdale@jhancock.com>, "Dan Revers (E-mail)"
<drevers@arclightcapital.com>, "Amy Weed (E-mail)" <aweed@jhancock.com>,
"BURKE, Ted (TDB)" <ted.burke@freshfields.com>

Subject: Pegasus: ENA Consent and Legal Opinion

This e-mail is confidential and may well also be legally privileged. If you
have received it in error, you are on notice of its status.  Please notify us
immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message from your system.
Please do not copy it or use it for any purposes, or disclose its contents to
any other person:  to do so could be a breach of confidence.  Thank you for
your co-operation.  Please contact our
IT Helpdesk on +44 (0) 20 7936 4000 Ext.2000 or email ITHelp@freshfields.com
if you need assistance.

We understand that the Letter Agreement is to be signed today, and attach
for your comments a form of ENA consent to collateral assignment of the
Letter Agreement and a form of legal opinion to be issued by in-house
counsel to ENA.  Both documents are conditions precedent to funding.

Kind regards
Isabel

 - NY003700425.DOC
 - NY003699617.DOC


Can you approve the bom+1 product for HSC-Hehub?

Thanks,

Eric


Shari:

It looks like Bob worked on the company above.  It it affiliated with
Consolidated Energy Company of New York, Inc. and Con Edison Energy
Solutions, Inc?

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


Jess, there is little more than I indicated in my note.
I received a phone call from Sarita Sarvate, an analyst at the Energy
Division of the CPUC asking why we were returning gas customers to utility
service, citing "a number of customer complaints, including a school and a
hospital".  It now turns out that the school and the hospital are from the
same customer essentially.  The CPUC staff recognizes that they have no
direct jurisdiction over gas sales, but are concerned about the effect of
turnbacks on their utility regulation, as they are in the process of
eliminating the core subscription program which allows noncore customers to
take core service.  In fact there is now a resolution in place barring
noncore customers from taking core subscrition service from SoCalGas or
SDG&E.  They want to know if this is part of a trend which they will have to
adapt to or whether it is an isolated incident.  In addition, they would
like to be able to offer the customer some options for continuing gas
service.

Let me know if I can add any more or if you can assist us in responding to
the CPUC.

Thanks, Mike Day

-----Original Message-----
From: Jess Hewitt [mailto:jhewitt@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 3:58 PM
To: MDay@GMSSR.com
Subject: CPUC inquiry re gas customer turnbacks

Mike,

My name is Jess Hewitt and I am in charge of the gas desk at EES.  I came in
late on this email string so can you give me a background on this situation?

jess
---------------------- Forwarded by Jess Hewitt/HOU/EES on 02/27/2001 05:56
PM
---------------------------

From: Harry Kingerski@ENRON on 02/27/2001 05:50 PM

To:   Jess Hewitt/HOU/EES@EES, Leslie Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject:  CPUC inquiry re gas customer turnbacks

any insights?  thanks.
----- Forwarded by Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron on 02/27/2001 05:49 PM -----
|--------+----------------------->
|        |          Jeff Dasovich|
|        |          Sent by: Jeff|
|        |          Dasovich     |
|        |                       |
|        |                       |
|        |          02/27/2001   |
|        |          05:47 PM     |
|        |                       |
|--------+----------------------->

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-|
|
|
|      To:
|
|      cc:
|
|      Subject:
|

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-|

Catherine/Roger:

Here are some more details forwarded by our outside counsel.

Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 02/27/2001 05:44 PM -----
|--------+----------------------->
|        |          MBD          |
|        |          <MDay@GMSSR.c|
|        |          om>          |
|        |                       |
|        |          02/27/2001   |
|        |          05:25 PM     |
|        |                       |
|--------+----------------------->

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-|
|
|
|      To:
|
|      cc:
|
|      Subject:
|

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-|

Jeff:

Here is some more useful information.  Sarita Sarvate of the CPUC spoke to
the woman in person.  The school in question is the Providence High School
in Burbank, California (not Ontario), operated by the Sisters of Providence.
Ms. Kathy Pentalio (sp?) at 818-846-8140 wrote to the CPUC asking about the
school's options after receiving phone and letter notification that their
gas service would be terminated by Enron.  Apparently the Sisters also
operate a hospital which is also served by Enron.  Ms. Pentalio indicated
that she was told that the school would no longer be served on the same
contract as the hospital (claimed to be an attractive 86 cents/th rate)
because the school's load was so small that it was a core customer, while
the hospital was a noncore customer with a larger load.   Neither Ms.
Sarvate nor Ms. Pentalio was clear if the school was served as a core
aggregation customer or as part of the Sisters of Providence noncore
contract.  Ms. Pentalio claimed she spoke with Enron employees Dennis Harris
in Dublin, Ohio as well as Roger Pons in New Mexico.  She indicated that
service would be terminated on June 1, 2001 and she is looking for
alternative sources of gas.

Sarita Sarvate of the CPUC Energy Division would like to understand the
specifics of this case, but her main concern, and the purpose for sending a
letter (if she does send one) is that Dynergy has told her that a number of
small noncore businesses are being returned to the utilities by marketers
because they no longer meet credit requirements.  She assumed that must be
true with Enron as well.  I indicated to her that she should never assume
that we are doing what Dynegy is doing and that we would respond and advise
her if there was any significant trend of noncore customer turnbacks.  The
Commission's concern, which I know you understand, is that it is phasing out
the core subscription schedule (and has a moratorium on switches to the
SoCalGas core subscription schedule) therefore leaving no place for such
customers to go if they cannot contract with a replacement aggregator.

Please advise me of what you discover about this matter and we can talk
further about a response to the CPUC.   Thank you.

Mike Day


How did the pattened move work?

cd


Mark -- If possible, I'd like to schedule some time with you (10 min) to discuss approval of a certificates transaction that involves ECE and Elektro.  Orlando has scheduled some time w/ Lavorato at 1:00 Houston time, so sometime before then would be best if you are available.  A memo has been prepared by Vicky Martinez that should have been forwarded to you by now, but I'll confirm that.  Please let me know what works for you.

Regards,
	John


Please look at two supply deals with Enserco at the Citygate for March 2001.  Nov-Mar deal, number 396352, at 11.27 and a March only deal, number 63338(?),  at 10.59.  They are contesting the fact that we allocated all cuts to the highest priced deal.  Cost $72000.  Please take a look at these deals and the cuts and let me know if we should agree to their argument and reallocate 50/50.

Thanks,
Mike


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	Mkt Srvc Training w/Dir Rpts and Tammy Lee-Jaquet - 4102

Date:		5/17/2001
Time:		4:00 PM - 5:00 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


Kay, can you set up a dinner with Randall.

Thanks
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 09/25/2000
08:08 PM ---------------------------

Randall Curry@ENRON
09/25/2000 06:40 PM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Calpine

Dave,

Thanks for following through with the contact.  As we discussed, the
discussions we had with Calpine were at a local level and very preliminary,
with Bridgeline indicating to Calpine that we are always open to looking at
ways that will enhance shareholder value.  I agree with you that at this time
it has a low probability of evolving into anything.

On a separate note, I would like to take you up on your offer of your time
and resources.  I know that Bridgeline is a very small component of the
things that are on your radar screen, but if it is not too much of an
imposition, I would like to have a one on one discussion with you concerning
a few of the issues we discussed at the management committee mtg.

I want to make sure that I am crystal clear on the perspectives and desires
of both parents.  Coming from Texaco, I feel like I have a good feel for
Texaco's short and long term expectations for the partnership, however I
would like to dig a little deeper with you on a few of the issues we
discussed at the management committee mtg, and a couple of your points in
your follow up email to me.

The afternoon or evening would work best for me, and I would be happy to pick
up the tab for dinner one night if that fits with your schedule.  The balance
of this week is kind of tight, however, the week of September 2nd and 9th are
fairly open with the exception of Tuesday night the 3rd.

Thanks for your help, look forward to talking to you soon.

Randy

David W Delainey@ECT
09/22/2000 06:48 PM
To: Randall Curry/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Brian Redmond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jean Mrha/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Calpine

Randy, Scott Healy contacted Bob Kelly at Calpine about Calpine's potential
interest in Bridgeline and he found that Kelly and Cartwright had no real
knowledge of the potential deal.  Likely this originates at the local level
and is probably a long put.  Kelly was going to get back to Scott with more
detail over the next week.

Regards
Delainey


---------------------- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES on 09/05/2000 05:00
PM ---------------------------


Enron has begun its executive solicitation for United Way.  You should have
received an email providing the intranet address where you can pledge
online.
(Please note:  when entering the information online - enter 4 digits for your
birth year).

I encourage you to be the leaders in giving for Governmental Affairs/Public
Relations and make your pledge this week.

Further, please invite the generous participation of the people in your
groups.  Thank you for your involvement.


Comments marked.  Thanks, Edmund

Suryan Wirya Simunovic
07/07/2000 03:07 PM
To: Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amita
Gosalia/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Peter Bradley/LON/ECT@ECT, Edmund Cooper/LON/ECT@ECT, Nick
Mooney/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: International Coal Ticker Story

Gentlemen,
We have the following Newsticker story we want to launch on EnronOnline
ASAP.  Could you confirm if the wording is appropriate from the PR and legal
points of view.  Would appreciate your soonest to reply to myself or Amita so
that we can proceed.
Thank you
Suryan
---------------------- Forwarded by Suryan Wirya Simunovic/LON/ECT on
07/07/2000 14:39 ---------------------------

Peter Bradley
07/07/2000 14:34
To: Nick Mooney/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Suryan Wirya Simunovic/LON/ECT@ECT, Jez Peters/LON/ECT@ECT, Stuart
Staley/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: international coal ticker story

I we going to get this one out today or tomorrow. would really prefer today
if possible.

peter


Attached is a progress report on the agenda items that were prepared in our
last meeting.  We can discuss completion items during our meeting tomorrow.

 Jim


---------------------- Forwarded by Don Miller/HOU/ECT on 08/25/2000 06:27 PM
---------------------------

"Mukherjee, Gautam" <GautamMukherjee@ICFConsulting.com> on 08/25/2000
05:00:19 PM
To: "Don Miller (E-mail)" <Don.Miller@enron.com>
cc: "Fusco, Maria" <MariaFusco@ICFConsulting.com>, "Leitz, Thomas"
<ThomasLeitz@ICFConsulting.com>
Subject: Power Market Overview

Hi Don,
 Attached is the updated version of the Power Market
Overview. Please don't hesitate to call us if you have any
questions.

 <<Power Market Overview.doc>>

Thanks,

Gautam Mukherjee
Senior Associate
ICF Consulting
gmukherjee@icfconsulting.com
Voice (703) 934 - 3547
Fax (703) 934 - 3968

 - Power Market Overview.doc


Dave, the memo looks fine. Please send it to the members.  Thank you. Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"David Winn" <dwinn@swlegal.org>@ENRON
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 11:37 AM
To:	Derrick Jr., James
Subject:	Nov. 2 Meeting Cancellation Notice

Jim,

We need to advise the Executive Committee members that the November 2
meeting is canceled so they can free next Friday up on their calendars.

Shall I send the memo below (after you've added the dates you propose
and made any other modifications you wish), or would you rather I
contact them myself and simply tell them to stand by for more
information?

Thanks.

David

  _____

TO: The Executive Committee of the Institute for Law and Technology

FROM: James V. Derrick, Jr., Chair

RE: Our Inaugural Meeting

Due to conflicts in several of our members' schedules, I have determined
to re-schedule our inaugural meeting from November 2 to a later date. I
hope this does not greatly inconvenience those of you who have already
made your plans to attend on the 2nd.

Rather than simply announcing the new date, I'd like to try to find a
date suitable for all members. Please advise David Winn (
<mailto:(dwinn@swlegal.org> dwinn@swlegal.org or 972-664-3488) of your
availability on the following dates for our meeting in Dallas - as we
originally planned, we will begin with a working lunch at 12:00 p.m.
followed by drinks and an early dinner afterwards:

a) ____________

b) ____________

c) ____________

d) ____________

After reviewing your responses, we'll promptly schedule our meeting for
the date most convenient to the greatest number of committee members and
notify you of the new date.

Please pardon this change in plans. I do think it is important that we
have a full attendance as we chart our course for our first year, and
I'm looking forward to getting on with our work.


Following up on our conversation, attached is a revised draft of the
Confidentiality Agreement blacklined to show changes from the agreement you
provided to Michael Cyrus last week.  Please call me with any comments or
questions you may have.

 <<Confidentiality Agreement between Enron North America Corp and Cinergy
Services Inc..DOC>>

 - Confidentiality Agreement between Enron North America Corp and Cinergy
Services Inc..DOC


more info on Azurix in Argentina
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron on 04/27/2000
04:15 PM ---------------------------

Carol Hensley@AZURIX
04/27/2000 03:29 PM
To: Andrea Mainelli/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Elizabeth Ivers/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX,
Richard Jigarjian/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Keith Crane/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Joe
Hillings/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Amanda K Martin/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Michael
Wood/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, John Wodraska/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Carolyn
Green/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kelly
Kimberly/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jose
Bestard/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: Bahia Blanca Update and Message Points for April 27

Attached are message points that we are using with constituents and the media
in Argentina, reflecting the progress that has been made today.


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 11/14/2000
04:01 PM ---------------------------

Jackson Logan
11/14/2000 03:16 PM
To: Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, B Scott Palmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam
Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor Guggenheim/HOU/ECT@ECT, Darron C
Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, jlogan@hough.com, plogan@grubb-ellis-tx.com,
jennifer.stelling@gtedc.gte.com, jwooton@keystonemortpartners.com,
cshi@dynegy.com, John_biegel@dell.com, bgalligan@mail.utexas.edu,
carey.t.ford@us.arthurandersen.com, gkaminski@dttus.com,
Brian_Thorp@AIMFUNDS.COM, JAMES.SIVCO@chase.com, tifftalbot@hotmail.com,
jmwooton@yahoo.com, njw4@worldnet.att.net, KHunter75@aol.com,
ttalbot@bmoh.com, RCOLLINS@graubassett.com, cameron.moates@us.pwcglobal.com,
atransou@wsgr.com, onion@pdq.net, shack4@alumni.utexas.net,
ECard10007@aol.com, ryaf@softchoice.com, Madeofmetal@Sprintmail.Com,
LtColby.H@att.net, Stefanie_Wagenfeld@AIMFUNDS.COM
cc:
Subject: To Awesome not to forward

Subject: Story of the ant and the grasshopper

THE CLASSIC VERSION -
    The ant works hard in the withering heat all summer long, building his
house and laying up supplies for the winter. The Grasshopper thinks he's a
fool and laughs and dances and plays the summer away. Come winter, the ant
is warm and well fed. The grasshopper has no food or shelter so he dies out
in the cold.

THE MODERN VERSION -
 The ant works hard in the withering heat all summer long, building his
house and laying up supplies for the winter. The Grasshopper thinks he's a
fool and laughs and dances and plays the summer away.
    Come winter, the shivering grasshopper calls a press conference and
demands to know why the ant should be allowed to be warm and well fed while
others are cold and starving. CBS, NBC and ABC show up to provide pictures
of the shivering grasshopper next to a video of the ant in his comfortable
home with a table filled with food.
    "America" is stunned by the sharp contrast. How can this be, that in a
country of such wealth, this poor grasshopper is allowed to suffer so?
Kermit the Frog appears on Oprah with the grasshopper, and everybody cries
when they sing "It's Not Easy Being Green."
    Bill and Hillary Clinton make a special guest appearance on the CBS
Evening News to tell a concerned Dan Rather that they will do everything
they Can for the grasshopper who has been denied the prosperity he deserves
by Those who benefited unfairly during the Reagan summers, or as Bill
refers
to it as "Temperatures of the 80's."
    Jesse Jackson stages a demonstration in front of the ant's house where
the news stations film the group singing "We shall overcome". Jesse then
has
the group kneel down to pray to God for the grasshopper's sake.
    Al Gore exclaims in an interview with Peter Jennings that the ant has
gotten rich off the back of the grasshopper, and calls for an immediate tax
hike on the ant to make him pay his "fair share".
    Finally, the EEOC drafts the "Economic Equity and Anti-Ant Act",
retroactive to the beginning of the summer. The ant is fined for failing to
hire a proportionate number of green bugs and, having nothing left to pay
his retroactive taxes, his home is confiscated by the government.
    Hillary gets her old law firm to represent the grasshopper in a
Defamation suit against the ant, and the case is tried before a panel of
federal judges that Bill appointed from a list of single-parent welfare
recipients who can only hear cases on Thursday's between 1:30 and 3:00 PM
when there are no talk shows scheduled. The ant loses the case.
    The story ends as we see the grasshopper finishing up the last bits of
The ant's food while the government house he is in, which just happens to
be
the ant's old house, crumbles around him since he doesn't maintain it. The
ant has disappeared in the snow. And on the TV, which the grasshopper
bought
by selling most of the ant's food, they are showing Bill Clinton standing
before a wildly applauding group of Democrats announcing that a new era of
"fairness" has dawned in America.
    The grasshopper is found dead in a drug related incident and the house,
now abandoned, is taken over by a gang of spiders who terrorize the once
peaceful neighborhood.

Remember to Vote .!!


Luanne:
This looked fine.  In the first paragraph please change the name from Enron
Risk Management Services Corp. to Enron North America Corp.  I look forward
to receiving the paperwork from you and getting this wrapped up.
Carol


Paula,

 35 million is fine

Phillip


This is the list of financial trades with PG&E power sub--going out on our
omnibus.  This looks like a good candidate for a master.  Mary

Cordially,
Mary Cook
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith, 38th Floor, Legal
Houston, Texas   77002-7361
(713) 345-7732 (phone)
(713) 646-3490 (fax)
mary.cook@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Mary Cook/HOU/ECT on 12/08/2000 09:57 AM -----

	Rhonda L Denton
	12/08/2000 09:52 AM

		 To: Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject:

This report does not have volume or prices.  If you need this info, let me
know.


In late November, you were asked to participate in the &Excellence Through
Communications8 survey.  We want to thank you for your outstanding response.

48% of ENA employees spent time giving us valuable feedback regarding Vision
and Values. This was our best response to date.   You may view the specific
data by clicking on this link.
http://home.ena.enron.com/content/mi/files/etc2000_ena.pdf

Overall, your feedback tells us that efforts in several key areas are having
an impact.  They include:

? Access to information
? Access to and utilization of people resources
? Performance Management Process

Some areas need further understanding and alignment to create an environment
where you can achieve your personal best. They are:

?  Communications, especially across departments and regarding strategic
direction
?  IT support
?  Teamwork/ Work Process
?  Support for expressing opinions and challenging the status quo
?  Leadership/management skills
?  The Human Resources System, i.e. performance management, career
development and training

As part of ENA,s commitment to supporting the Vision and Values, an ENA
Vision and Values committee has been organized to champion ongoing efforts in
this area.  Actions already in progress include:

?  Formation of Focus groups, which will begin the process of clarifying
specific communications issues and providing more details around actions to
take.

?  Development of a management skills curriculum and programs, which will
rollout in March.

?  An all-employee meeting to be held in March 2000 to discuss ENA,s
direction and address some of these issues.

?  Brown bag luncheons and department meetings, as well as other means to
communicate between teams and departments, will begin soon.

?  Understanding ENA, a revised orientation, detailing the structure of our
organization and deal flow work process scheduled to begin February 24th.

?  Performance Management/Career development activities will continue to be
monitored and appropriate actions taken as needed.

We will continue to communicate to you about further actions and activities
as they are developed.  Again, thank you for the time you spent completing
the survey.


Mark,
        Thanks for the update.  No problem with the change.
Ray
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark.Greenberg@enron.com [mailto:Mark.Greenberg@enron.com ]
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 10:55 AM
To: rdezenzo@quallaby.com
Cc: Tana.Jones@enron.com; Dan.Cummings@enron.com; Rick.Shoup@enron.com
Subject: RE: Quallaby / Evaluation Agreement
Ray -
I apologize.  It appears that I did not circulate the agreement for signature.  I have done so this a.m. and it should be sent to you later today.
One note, in Paragraph 2.1, Quallaby had inserted the phrase "best efforts" in relation to action by Enron to procure protection for disclosed information.  I have revised this one item to read "reasonable efforts" - which is consistent with my comments made in other areas of the agreement.
Thanks for the patience and, once again, I apologize for the delay.
Mark
    -----Original Message-----
   From:   "DeZenzo, Ray" <rdezenzo@quallaby.com>@ENRON
             [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22DeZenzo+2C+20Ray+22+20+3Crdezenzo+40quallaby+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com ]
   Sent:   Thursday, October 04, 2001 7:51 AM
   To:     Shoup, Rick; Greenberg, Mark
   Cc:     Jones, Tana; Cummings, Dan
   Subject:  RE: Quallaby / Evaluation Agreement
   Quallaby has not rec'd anything.
   Please confirm use of the following address:
           Quallaby Corporation
           59 Composite Way, Suite 400
           Lowell, MA 01851
           Attn: Ray DeZenzo
   Thanks.
   -----Original Message-----
   From: Rick.Shoup@enron.com [mailto:Rick.Shoup@enron.com  << File:
   mailto:Rick.Shoup@enron.com  >> ]
   Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 7:13 PM
   To: Mark.Greenberg@enron.com; rdezenzo@quallaby.com
   Cc: Tana.Jones@enron.com; Dan.Cummings@enron.com
   Subject: RE: Quallaby / Evaluation Agreement
   Mark,
      Has Quallaby been sent the signed document?
   Thanks,
   Rick
      -----Original Message-----
      From: Greenberg, Mark
      Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 10:30 PM
      To: "DeZenzo, Ray" <rdezenzo@quallaby.com>@ENRON
      Cc: Jones, Tana; Shoup, Rick; Greenberg, Mark
      Subject: RE: Quallaby / Evaluation Agreement
      Ray -
      The changes made are acceptable.  I will have two originals
   circulated
      internally for signature and forward them to your company for
      counter-signature.
      As I will be out of the office through tomorrow, it may be the end of
      the week before you have the agreements in hand.
      Mark
        -----Original Message-----
        From: "DeZenzo, Ray" <rdezenzo@quallaby.com>@ENRON
        Sent: Mon 9/17/2001 5:37 PM
        To: Greenberg, Mark
        Cc: Shoup, Rick; Axbey, Tom; Borchgrevink, Jack
        Subject: RE: Quallaby / Evaluation Agreement
        Mark,
                Attached you'll find a clean and blackline version of the
        revised agreement which reflects changes resulting from your items
        1,2,3 and 5 below.  The intent behind not changing item 4 is that
   if
        Enron were to use the software in one of the identified "dangerous
   or
        hazardous" uses Enron would be on it's own.  If you have any
   further
        questions or comments please do not hesitate to contact me at 978
        322-4220.  Otherwise please arrange to execute 1 original and fax
   it
        to me at 978 322-4100 for counter signing.
        Thanks,
        Ray
        -----Original Message-----
        From: Mark.Greenberg@enron.com [ mailto:Mark.Greenberg@enron.com
   << File: mailto:Mark.Greenberg@enron.com  >>
        <mailto:Mark.Greenberg@enron.com  << File:
   mailto:Mark.Greenberg@enron.com  >> > <<mailto:Mark.Greenberg@enron.com
   << File: mailto:Mark.Greenberg@enron.com  >> >>
        ]
        Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 10:44 AM
        To: rdezenzo@quallaby.com
        Cc: Rick.Shoup@enron.com
        Subject: RE: Quallaby / Evaluation Agreement
        Ray -
        Thanks for the response and the black line.  Below are my
   additional
        comments:
        1.  The reference to "Hardware Products" needs to be deleted, as
   does
        the
        Schedule B.  It is my understanding that the hardware is provided
   by a
        different vendor.  If it is necessary to reference the hardware as
   a
        requirement for running the software programs, this should be
   listed
        in
        Schedule A as a specification.
        2.  Paragraph 2.1 - the term "its best efforts" should be replaced
        with
        "reasonable efforts" and, if it is Quallaby's position that Enron
        pursue
        confidential treatment of the information, despite legal
   requirements
        to
        disclosed placed on Enron, the reasonable cost for pursuing this
        protection
        should be borne by Quallaby.
        3.  Paragraph 3.2 - the change made at the end of the paragraph
   needs
        to
        read "... BUT SPECIFICALLY EXCLUDING ANY WARRANTIES ASSOCIATED WITH
        THE
        INDEMNITY OBLIGATIONS OF SECTION 3.1(a) AND 3.1(b) ABOVE."  Since
        neither
        of the referenced provisions are, themselves, warranties, it is
        incorrect
        to reference them in 3.2 as being warranties.
        4.  Paragraph 3.3 - the following language should be inserted after
        the
        word "applications" - "save and except for any indemnity
   obligations
        of
        Quallaby set forth in Section 3.1 above."  By not having this
        reference, it
        is possible that section 3.3 could be read to negate Quallaby's
        obligations
        as set out in Section 3.1.
        5.  In Section 5 of the Agreement - a new paragraph should be added
   as
        paragraph 5.9 to indicate as follows:  "The provisions of Sections
   2,
        3 and
        4 shall survive any termination or expiration of this Agreement."
        This is
        more so important now that Quallaby has included specific
   provisions
        enabling it to terminate the agreement upon a threat of an
        infringement
        claim.
        With changes in the areas indicated above incorporated into the
        agreement,
        we are prepared to move this matter forward.
        Thanks for your continued assistance and cooperation.
        Mark
            -----Original Message-----
           From:   "DeZenzo, Ray" <rdezenzo@quallaby.com>@ENRON
                     [
   mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22DeZenzo+2C+20Ray+22+20+3Crdezenzo+40quallaby+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com
    << File:
   mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22DeZenzo+2C+20Ray+22+20+3Crdezenzo+40quallaby+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com
   >>
        <
   mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22DeZenzo+2C+20Ray+22+20+3Crdezenzo+40quallaby+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com
    << File:
   mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22DeZenzo+2C+20Ray+22+20+3Crdezenzo+40quallaby+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com
   >> >
        <<
   mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22DeZenzo+2C+20Ray+22+20+3Crdezenzo+40quallaby+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com
    << File:
   mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22DeZenzo+2C+20Ray+22+20+3Crdezenzo+40quallaby+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com
   >> >>
        ]
           Sent:   Monday, September 17, 2001 7:44 AM
           To:     Greenberg, Mark
           Cc:     Shoup, Rick; Borchgrevink, Jack; Axbey, Tom
           Subject:  Quallaby / Evaluation Agreement
           Mark,
                   Attached you'll find a clean and blackline version of
   the
           Evaluation Agreement.  We have accepted many of your changes and
           rearranged others.  If you have any questions or would like to
        discuss
           any component of the agreement please do not hesitate to contact
   me
           directly at 978 322-4220.  Otherwise please arrange to execute 1
           original and fax it to me at 978 322-4100 for counter signing.
           Thanks,
           Ray DeZenzo
           CFO
           Quallaby Corporation
            <<Evaluation Agreement - Enron - 010917.DOC>>  <<Evaluation
        Agreement -
           Enron - 010917-BL.DOC>>
            - Evaluation Agreement - Enron - 010917.DOC << File: Evaluation
           Agreement - Enron - 010917.DOC >>
            - Evaluation Agreement - Enron - 010917-BL.DOC << File:
   Evaluation
           Agreement - Enron - 010917-BL.DOC >>
   **********************************************************************
        This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant
        affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for
   the
        sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use,
   distribution
        or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the
        intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient),
        please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at
        enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of
   the
        message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended
   to
        be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
   binding
        and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
        affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may
   not
        be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or
        otherwise. Thank you.
   **********************************************************************
         - Evaluation Agreement - Enron - 010917-2.DOC <<Evaluation
   Agreement
        - Enron - 010917-2.DOC>>
         - Evaluation Agreement - Enron - 010917-2-BL.DOC <<Evaluation
        Agreement - Enron - 010917-2-BL.DOC>>


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Shepperd, Tammy R.
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 2:29 PM
To:	Rangel, Ina; Neal, Scott
Subject:	6th floor spreadsheet

Here you go!


I need the estimates for Sunniland-into-liquids and the fiber-in-the-row
(instead of in-the-pipe) the day before this meeting.


Ellen:

I've reviewed WestLB's optional early termination language which is similar
to the other's which I've reviewed (e.g., Goldman, Chase, Merrill, etc.).
Here's how it works for your 3/26/01 - 3/26/21 swap:

(1)  March 28, 2011 is the "Break Date" or "Early Termination Date".

(2)  Either party can give notice of early termination to the other party on
the day that is 5 NY Business Days prior to the Break Date.  By the way, this
is also the day on which the parties must mutually agree on 5 leading dealers
in the relevant market in case the valuation process in (3) below is later
disputed by the other party.

(3)  The party giving notice determines (in good faith) the Cash Settlement
Amount as of 11 a.m. NY time on the Break Date (which should be the
mid-market value of the deal on the Break Date.

(4)  Payment will occur on the Break Date.

(5)  I am adding a provision requiring the exercising party to notify the
other party on the day that is 3 NY Business Days prior to the Break Date.
There may be a dispute over the calculation and the parties will need to
resolve.

(6)  If the parties cannot agree on the Cash Settlement Amount calculation,
then the party who gave notice seeks mid-market quotes from the 5 leading
dealers (previously agreed to) at 11 a.m. on the day that is 2 NY Business
Days before the Break Date.  The confirm describes how the quotes are
averaged.  A minimum of 3 quotes is essential.  Payment is still made on the
Break Date.

George:

(1)  Please verify that the Break Date is 3/28/11.  My copy is a little fuzzy
and the date could actually be 3/26/11.

(2)  I've marked the confirm and faxed it to you.  Please note that:

 (a)  the second paragraph purports to incorporate the 1991 ISDA Definitions
but the master overrides this language because it incorporates the 1991
Definitions "as amended, modified, superceded or replaced from time to time"
(i.e., the 2000 ISDA Definitions).  There is a problem if  WestLB disagrees
because I've left some language in Paragraph 3 "as is" since it is based upon
the 2000 ISDA Definitions.

 (b)  no need to say that the Calculation Agent is "as otherwise stated in
the Agreement" because WestLB is stated to be the Calculation Agent in the
Agreement.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


Just to give you a "heads-up" we are preparing a request for proposal for
lead managers on a NBP debt financing.  The financing plan is for a $150
million term debt facility to payoff existing MLP bank debt and a $150
million bank revolver (which would be undrawn) to provide greater financial
flexibility in the future.  Although we haven't determined the list of
bidders a key objective is to provide additional fee income to those banks
willing to commit their balance sheets when needed (i.e. commercial banks) to
strengthen our position for future acquisition financing.  We will send you a
copy of the RFP and a list of recommended bidders mid next week.  We would
anticipate sending this out late next week.


Recalls need 24 hr notice - we require them to recall by 8 AM for gas to be
flowed the following day.


Start Date: 4/25/01; HourAhead hour: 14;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042514.txt

---- SC Trades Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/25/01
  TRADING_SC: PGAE
  PNT_OF_INTRC: NP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 2
  DEAL_NO: 1


Don:
This is the latest presentation.
Ben


Lost Items:
A cell phone and pair of glasses were found after the conference. Contact
Sara Davidson, if either of these items belongs to you.

Presentation Materials:
The guest speaker presentations will be available at the Enron Law Conference
website by the end of this week. The website is at
http://lawconference.corp.enron.com/. These materials can be found under the
Conference Schedule or . Through the icons on the left hand side the files
can be either launched and printed from the website, or the documents can be
sent to you via email.

Enron Legal Edge Availability:
Due to technical problems, the Enron Legal Edge will not be available till
later this week. An email will be sent out to all users when the site is
running and available. Sorry, for the delay.


Dear Dynegydirect Customer:

Dynegydirect is now available.  You may log back on at your earliest
convience.

We appreciate your patience.

Sincerely,

DYNEGYdirect e- care
Customer Support
Dynegy, Inc.
Ph: (877) 396.3493   Fx: (877) 396.3492
Email: ecare@dynegydirect.com


Good news.  Milbank's research has confirmed the advice provided by Sullivan
and Cromwell that the game will not vioate gaming or lottery rules or the
like in the US, with the exception of the states of Florida and New York.

Leslie
----- Forwarded by Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT on 08/15/2000 02:04 PM -----

	APelton@milbank.com
	08/15/2000 01:41 PM

		 To: leslie.hansen@enron.com
		 cc: EFeo@milbank.com, DHudanish@milbank.com, SMiller@milbank.com
		 Subject: Enron - State Regulation of Online Gaming

Dear Ms. Hansen:

Please find attached for your review a memo regarding the regulation of
online gaming in the most significant U.S. jurisdictions.? If you have any
questions or comments regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to
contact me.

Sincerely,

August W. Pelton
Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy
(213) 892-4345
(213) 892-4745 (fax)

 <<3_KB802!.doc>>

This e-mail message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee
or agent responsible for delivery of this message to the intended
recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail message is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify
the sender and delete this e-mail message from your computer.

 - 3_KB802!.doc


Hello, Everyone -

This Notice confirms our meeting for this coming Friday, March 23, 2001,
from 8:30 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. at the Sheraton Portland Airport Hotel.
Because there are fewer items on the agenda, this RRG meeting should be
shorter than usual, and we hope to wrap up by 11:00 a.m.

The purpose of the meeting is primarily to discuss with the RRG a phased
approach to implementing congestion management.  The filing utilities are
very aware of the concerns many parties have expressed about process
overload, and the burden this imposes on you. Consequently, the filing
utilities are considering a more focused process that will call for
prioritizing the work streams over the next few weeks.  Part of this more
focused process is a proposal for a potential phasing of congestion
management implementation. A background paper for your review before the
meeting is attached.

The working agenda is:

1. Market Monitoring:  Recommendation Regarding Stage 1 Decision

2. Clarification of RTO West Treatment of Losses

3. Clarification of Stage 1 Decision on Interconnection Standards

4.. Potential Phasing of Congestion Management Implementation

5. Report on TransConnect

6. Benefit-Cost Study

A word about the new benefit-cost study.  It is my view that before we can
profitably engage in a new study that will be useful to regional parties a
number of issues need to be resolved first.  For example, it will be
important to know and not just assume what the scope and regional
configuration of RTO West is likely to be.  We are all waiting for FERC's
response to the October 23 filing and its declaratory order regarding the
RTO West scope and regional configuration as proposed in the October 23
application.  The reason for my uncertainty and the need for clarification
on scope and regional configuration is FERC's press release of March 14 in
which it "encouraged the formation of a regional transmission organization
(RTO) for the western markets."  What does this mean for RTO West? In
addition to understanding the scope of RTO West, it will also be important
to know and not just assume what the congestion and pricing models will be
for RTO West.  Determining these models will probably take a few more weeks.
As we discussed in earlier RRG meetings, a benefit-cost analysis may become
important parts of filings with the various state commissions.
Understanding what the state commissions are looking for is also important.
Because of  the need for this information, and the more focused process we
are considering, I have recommended to the filing utilities that the
benefit-cost work be deferred until these issues are resolved.  I would
appreciate your views on this subject at the RRG meeting as well.

I look forward to seeing you this Friday, March 23.

- Bud

 - Congestion Model Disc 3-20-01.doc


Attached is a draft letter setting forth Enron's damages in connection with
the termination of certain commodity forward and swap positions with PG&E.
In lieu of sending out multiple letters and then aggregating the exposures
for set off purposes, I thought it would be more understandable if we put all
the matters in one letter.  For each product line,  I thought we could attach
all the relevant information (I'm not sure if this is making it too easy for
the court but it seems like the right thing to do). Each commodity line then
would assemble the following and attach as an Appendix to the letter:

1.  Copy of Master Contract or applicable GTC
2.  Copy of transaction confirmations
3.  Copy of termination notice sent to PG&E
4.  Chart summarizing key commercial terms of transaction(s)
5.  Chart summarizing unpaid receivables and invoices for same
6.  Chart setting forth termination payment calculation for each terminated
trade
7.  Paragraph describing methodology used to determine termination payment
valuation (eg - 4 quotes secured, threw out high and low and averaged middle)
8   List showing quotes secured (entity, person, time and amount) and the
extent available, written confirmation of such quote

I will be out of the office the rest of this week but will organize a call
for early next week in order to finalize the PG&E package.

Thanks for all your help.

Elizabeth Sager
713 853 6349


I have begun drafting of the override letter to accompany the GE
Form Agreement.  It is sufficiently different from the LM 6000 deals
that it is taking more time than I had anticipated.  Have you all done
any override letters for other deals such as Coyote? If so, it would
make things move faster since the Coyote agreement was the basis for the
form.


Hey Vince,

I e-mailed George to send you a resume.

Tom
Professor Tom Arnold
E.J. Ourso College of Business Administration
Department of Finance
2155 CEBA
Louisiana State University
Baton Rouge, LA 70803
O: 225-388-6369
F: 225-388-6366


Dr. Kaminski,
I think I'll be able to start work from the last week of May,
but not from monday,
probably, I'll be able to work from 5/30 (wed).
Will it be good? I know it is not that much earlier than I mentioned..6/4
I am sorry.

And actually, there is an e-business conference at Haas school of business,
organized by my advisor
Could you distribute the link and the attached invitation letter to groups
interested in e-business and especially procurement?
The link is as following.
http://www.haas.berkeley.edu/citm/conferences/010522/

I am afraid you might forgot this I told you in the last email...
My advisor (Arie Segev at Haas school of business; segev@haas.berkeley.edu)
wants me to ask whether you have any idea on joint research with him
during the summer, while I am staying there.
His interest is in e-business.. (what else..?)
and has expertise in e-procurement system and marketplace...
XML based standard such as OBI,cXML, xCBL, RosettaNet, BizTalk ..
system interoperability study, auction and negotiation, workflow system,
e-catalog management, digital signature, EDI, etc etc...
many technical aspects of e-business...
He wants to do some kind of technical case study
that is beneficial for both ENRON and him.
He may travel one or two times to Houston to have a meeting during the
summer.
(And to be frankly, this will be good for me too,
because I can have a meeting for my dissertation while he is in Houston..)
Could you think about the possibility of joint research, with him?

Thank you..

Sincerely,
Jinbaek

 - FCP-invite.pdf


Register for the Main Conference and a Pre-Conference Workshop                                                by January 25th and Save $400!                    (This is not to be combined with any other offer or discount and is for new registrations only).      CBI's 4th Annual -   ELECTRIC ASSET VALUATION    Apply Asset Valuation Models to Acquisition, Divestiture,  Development and Tax Scenarios to Maximize Your Profit  February 25-26, 2002 * Four Seasons Hotel * Houston, TX

                    Request More Information 	                          Register Now!
	     First-Hand Case Studies:   Duke Energy North America  Strategy and results in managing portfolio value    Dynegy Marketing & Trade   Evaluates purchases in primary and secondary transmission markets   FirstEnergy Corporation   How the developing market structure for ancillary services affects valuation   NRG Energy   Utilizes real options for  portfolio management   Orion Power Holdings   Real property tax implications  of a successful portfolio bid   PG&E National Energy Group   A successful approach to incorporation fuel price forecasts into asset valuation methods Plus   Financial Perspectives from:  Banc of America Securities  Credit Suisse First Boston  Morgan Stanley Dean Witter  Regulatory and RTO Updates from:  Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC)                                                  and more...    GAIN THE LATEST INSIGHTS ON:  Regional Supply and Demand - How potential  overbuild or shortage situations will affect asset valuation  FERC Update   Assess regulatory risks of market monitoring by RTOs  and the impact of restructured grids on plant values  Valuation of M&A Assets  Operating vs. development phase  Value through Acquisition  Growth vs. cash flow, time-to-revenue-generation  Portfolio Management   Design business models to maximize portfolio value  Bank Requirements - Merchant vs. contract markets  Capital Costs - Investors' evaluation criteria  Pricing Capital Investments - Generation vs.  transmission, distribution and ancillary services  Market Price Volatility Assess value-at-risk and cash flow exposure  Fuel Price Forecasting - Effective tools for evaluating  fuel sources regional differences and volatility  ________________________________________________________  ATTEND ONE OF OUR IN-DEPTH, PRE-CONFERENCE WORKSHOPS - MONDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 2002     A.   Strategically Use Real Options to  Mitigate Risk in Asset Valuation     B.  Optimize Property Tax Implications  of Asset Valuation

  Customer Service Center  Download Brochure    [IMAGE]    	 Contact Information CBI prides itself on making the registration process fast and convenientby providing 5 easy ways to register!    [IMAGE]   FAX 781-939-2490    [IMAGE]   PHONE 800-817-8601 781-939-2438    [IMAGE]   WEBSITE cbinet.com      [IMAGE]   MAIL Registration Dept  CBI 500 W. Cummings Park, Ste 5100 Woburn, MA 01801    [IMAGE]   EMAIL kimh@cbinet.com

If you received this e-mail in error or would like to be removed,  PLEASE CLICK HERE
0000639675


----- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 01/12/2001 07:59 AM -----

	Alan Comnes@ECT
	01/11/2001 10:13 PM

		 To: Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Steve C
Hall/PDX/ECT@ECT, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg Wolfe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill Williams
III/PDX/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: CAISO NOTIFICATION: DOE Certification for Operating Date
January  12, 2001

And here is the Richardson order.


Nav

What's going on. When I moved to Houston my e-mail address book got toasted so I am glad you sent your address. What's new? Where are you working now? I am in Houston trading electricity now. I like the job but the city is a dump.

Take it easy

Chris

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Nav Rahemtulla" <Rahemtulla@la.apollolp.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Nav+20Rahemtulla+22+20+3CRahemtulla+40la+2Eapollolp+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Tuesday, July 03, 2001 1:28 PM
To:	nrahemtulla@yahoo.com
Subject:	New Digits....

As you know, I gave up  my 3 month vacation as a beach bum a few weeks ago, and have joined the real world again (definately prefer the bum lifestyle!!).   And after a record-breaking move that started at 10pm and ended at 6:00am, I am now settled into a place back on the westside. As always, my door is open (literally), if you are looking for some California sun.

--Nav

Home:
10600 Wilshire Blvd. #732
Los Angeles, CA 90024

(310) 804-4704 (Cell)
(310) 441-9843 (Home)
(310) 201-4220 (Work)
nrahemtulla@yahoo.com

Nav Rahemtulla
Ares Management, L.P.
1999 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 1900
Los Angeles, CA 90067
(310) 201-4220 (phone)
(310) 201-4157 (fax)

**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the person or entity to whom they are addressed
and may contain confidential and/or privileged material.
Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking
of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities
other than the intended recipient is prohibited.
If you have received this email in error please contact the sender
and delete the material from any computer.

Apollo Management     AMLLD Tag
**********************************************************************


Let's make sure she gets an offer.  Thanks.  Jeff

Vince J Kaminski
01/23/2001 01:23 PM
To: Kristin Gandy/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: FW: Wharton Resume Submission - Summer Intern

Kristin.

Kim is a member of the Tiger Team. She is interested in a summer
internship with Enron and I shall be glad to take her.

Vince
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 01/23/2001
01:24 PM ---------------------------

"Kim Whitsel" <Kimberly.Whitsel.wg02@wharton.upenn.edu> on 01/22/2001
12:07:35 AM
To: <Christie.Patrick@enron.com>, <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: FW: Wharton Resume Submission

-----Original Message-----
From: Kim Whitsel [mailto:Kimberly.Whitsel.wg02@wharton.upenn.edu]
Sent: Friday, December 22, 2000 6:51 PM
To: kristin.gandy@enron.com
Subject: Wharton Resume Submission

Summer Position under Wharton Schedule #1823
 - Kim Whitsel -Enron Cover Letter.doc
 - Kim Whitsel- Wharton2 resume.doc


Went to the Press Club lunch with Loretta Lynch today.  I don't think there
was anything remarkable said; in fact, it was difficult to understand
exactly what she was saying due to an extreme case of laryngitis that kept
her voice to a whisper.

She opened with a speech (copies may be distributed later if possible)
saying that there are parallels between today and the 1920s, when California
first started to regulate the "unfettered markets."  Like then, she said, it
is unfair for a few sellers to have power over the supply of electricity in
California.

She called it a myth that the PUC opposed letting the utilities sign
long-term contracts.  When the utilities asked, she said, PUC gave them that
ability and that they indeed entered into contracts last fall.  In some
cases, they made a business decision not to.

She also said it is untrue to contend that the rate freeze is in opposition
to FERC's positions.  The rate freeze was an integral part of deregulation,
she said, and FERC approved the federal elements.

Part of the AB 1890 problem, she said, was that private generators would
have had to come into the state and somehow luckily find the right mix to
meet the state's needs, compared to a system in which a body such as the PUC
takes a role in planning.  She believes the PUC must take a greater role in
planning -- although she emphasized it only has jurisdiction over utilities
and their retained generation -- to maintain the state's economic stability
and prevent having to buy electricity at skyrocketing rates.  She
characterized AB 1890 as flawed theory and unfulfilled promise.

She said FERC has not used its authority to protect California from unjust
rates.

She is in favor of cost-based rates and wants to regulate the utilities'
retained generation.

I managed to ask her if, as legislative and administrative efforts progress
and California possibly buys the grid and more, whether she believes
California will "wall itself off" in the name of self-sufficiency or use an
open-access approach.  I followed her answer by asking if she has detected
any fear from other western states about the affect California's decisions
will have on them.

Her reply:  We need to look out for California but there is no way you can
isolate yourself because of the nature of power sharing arrangements and the
way power moves.  We need to include the interests of neighboring states.
Other states have often had better systems for meeting power needs and we
need to learn from those.  We need to fix lax market rules.

She indicated that there is a willingness to work with the other states, and
that there is something of a sense that we're all in this together.

Other stuff:  When asked if the state could lock into long term contracts
without a rate increase, she said it depends on how you do it.  It depends
on the type of long term contract and QF reform that doesn't put QFs out of
business.

About 30% of California's power is still generated by utilities and
therefore can be regulated by the PUC.  She thinks we should re-look at the
baselines to reflect the 21st century, possibly by nature of use or other
factors instead of the climate zones California uses now.

A serious problem in California, she said, is that the accountability and
responsibility for power needs is fractured.  One entity's only purpose may
be to make sure power is available, but they won't necessarily consider what
it will cost.  California "must repair the link between responsibility and
reliability," she said, adding as a good soldier that the Davis
Administration has taken steps in that direction.

Finally, she was asked about this summer and if blackouts will occur.  Her
prediction:  If we save 10%, we'll be OK (there was a low grumble in the
room, obviously implying people thought that was unlikely).  If it's a 1 in
2 year, we're OK.  If it's a 1 in 20 year, serious problems are ahead.


Mr & Mrs. James Rogers
6 Noel Lane
Cincinnati, OH 45243


Steve:
Per your request I have included a listng of our accepts and declines on the
Associate and Analyst levels.

Please let me know if I can provide any additional information.

Lexi
3-4585


Mark - I believe our Real Time group is sending your group a spreadsheet
outlining all of the trades they do on behalf of EES each day. The first two
deals - 544537 and 544544 - should be included in that sheet. The only deals
recorded in the sheet I send are fixed price (and sometimes Dow Jones
index-forward) day-ahead trades done by the EPMI Short Term California desk.

The third deal - 553219 - is in EnPower at the correct price of $133.23. The
worksheet price was not updated from the day before, but it's been corrected.

The fourth deal - 553219 - again is a Real Time deal. It looks like it was
entered on 3/19 for 3/19 HE 1. It's a deal for 25 MW, not 150 MW, at $175.00.
I'm not quite sure why EES thinks this deal should be in for HE 1-6 on 3/16.
If you have any more information, please send that along to Bill Williams III
and me.

I hope this helps. Let me know if you have anymore questions.

Thanks,
Kate

Mark Confer
03/22/2001 06:40 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Virginia Thompson/PDX/ECT@ECT

Subject: EES Worksheet Question

Kate, these deal we believe my just need to be updated on your schedule.  If
you can please take a look and let me know.

1) 3-11-01 Buy 544537.1 not on your schedule

2) 3-11-01 Sell 544544.1 not on your schedule (Kate this one may not be part
of the schedule)  What all goes on it?

3) 3-15-01 Sell 550208.1 Price $133.23, Per EES the schedule is at $113.07

4) 3-19-01 Buy 553219.1 0-6 150 mwh @ $175.00 ST-Hourly, EES has this as a
real time deal on 3-16 @ $125

Thanks,

Mark


sorry that's Prebon ref number.   The deal is 495120.

Thanks!!

   Kate Symes @ ECT                01/12/2001 11:19 AM

To: Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: deal 287933

287933 shows Sempra Energy Trading as the counterparty......?

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
01/12/2001 09:24 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: deal 287933

Please ch name to TransCanada Power, A Division of TransCanada Energy,
instead of TransCanada Power Marketing

Thanks


FYI.

Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 02/25/2001 03:33 PM -----

	Tom Riley/Western Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange
	Sent by: Michele Curtis/Western Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange
	02/23/2001 08:12 PM

		 To: Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES,
Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Gahn/HOU/EES@EES, Dennis
Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Eric Melvin/HOU/EES@EES, Maureen Palmer/HOU/EES@EES,
Wanda Curry/HOU/EES@EES, wanda.curry/HOU/EES@EES, Evan Hughes/HOU/EES@EES,
msmith7043@houton.rr.com@SMTP@Exchange, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Tom
Riley/Western Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange
		 cc:
		 Subject: UC/CSU

Attorney/Client Privileged Information

Summary of our follow-on discussion with UC/CSU Friday afternoon (Tom/Dennis
from Enron):
1.  UC/CSU's goal is to reach agreement on the interim solution by the end of
next week (Friday, 3/2)
2.  UC/CSU would like draft language memorializing the structure contemplated
below by COB Monday, 2/26, and asked what our proposed form of agreement
would be (letter agreement, amendment).  Their preference is the first and
expressed concern that if the draft had too many legal terms and/or was too
one-sided, that it would be unrealistic to expect approval by Friday.  I have
since spoken to Mike and I will propose to UC/CSU that we get them a term
sheet on Monday for discussion, with the intent of wrapping the terms into a
letter agreement of a couple pages.
3.  UC/CSU is considering underwriting the risk they would be absorbing
through the interim agreement.
4.  It is both our expectations that during the interim period we would gain
some clarity on the legislative/regulatory landscape such that we could begin
working on a long-term solution.
5.  If we don't reach a long-term solution, we would flip back to the terms
of the existing contract, and are back to the existing issues.
6.  We reinforced the highly confidential nature of these discussions.
Commercial terms
? Intent is to offer an intermediate solution to mediate UC/CSU's concern of
potential long-term consequences (loss of direct access rights preventing
them from gaining financial benefits) due to status as a bundled utility
customer.  Want time for landscape to solidify so we can agree on a long term
solution that would retain them as a direct access customer or a synthetic
version of that (i.e., they still receive the benefits).
? Enron would re-DASR accounts, assuming the following:
? UC/CSU assume liabilities from February 1, 2001 through end of term of
interim agreement, resulting from that action.
? Term to be 90 days, with the option to extend upon the mutual agreement of
both parties.
? Calculation methodology of the liability:  Spot market price minus the
prevailing bundled utility rate plus load shaping costs (Dennis - please
provide the methodology.  Also, what about A/R risk, treatment of
surcharges?).
? Exposure is calculated ex-post (i.e., we will not agree to an amount,
capped or fixed, at the outset).  They want an estimation of the potential
exposure, so we need to make sure we have proper protection that does not
bind us to that estimation. (Alternatively, we can provide them this
estimation outside the agreement, with the same caveats).
? Agree during interim period to work together (good faith effort) to
mitigate the exposure of the liability.
? UC/CSU assumes risk that should we be barred from re-de-DASRing at the end
of the term (due to legislative, regulatory or other actions or
circumstances), UC/CSU would assume this exposure as well.  They countered
with a suggestion for our consideration that such an occurrence be treated as
a force majure event with the affect of terminating the contract.  (This
seems counter-intuitive to me to their desire to remain a direct access
customer - see concern below).
? This was not discussed, but term should include a provision for
confidentiality.
Concern:
It is somewhat disconcerting they have asked for and are considering this
proposal.  They are absorbing our risk, which we shared to be a very large
number ($100M+ over the remaining contract term).  They also did not want to
discuss their regulatory concerns, and enter into a discussion with Dasovich
regarding these.  These points lead me to believe that perhaps they know
something we don't.  Just a consideration for our call Saturday.
Tom

From: Tom Riley/Western Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange@Exchange on
02/23/2001 03:56 PM
To: Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES,
Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Gahn/HOU/EES@EES, Eric Melvin/HOU/EES@EES,
Maureen Palmer/HOU/EES@EES, Wanda Curry/HOU/EES@EES, Evan Hughes/HOU/EES@EES,
Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Don Black/HOU/EES@EES, Neil Bresnan/HOU/EES@EES
Subject:

We had a cordial and outside the box discussion with UC/CSU today.

On the call, UC/CSU expressed a concern that in light of the uncertain and
rapidly evolving regulatory and legislative landscape, they do not feel it to
be prudent for them to consider our long-term proposed solutions.  They were
intrigued by our offers and we will take them up at a later date.  In the
meantime, they are proposing we price a short term deal.  This will buy them
re-DASR status until the end of the current uncertain situation.

Proposed Structure:

Enron to temporarily Re-DASR UC/CSU accounts.  UC/CSU liable for any
additional costs incurred by Enron as a result of that action.  Such costs
may include, but not be limited to the following: account receivable risks,
difference between spot market price and utility bundled rate, exposure to
changes in calculation of PX credit applicable to direct access providers (as
compared to spot market purchase price), load shaping costs to follow
customer hourly load without availability of the PX.

Assumptions:

? Enron has sole option to return accounts to De-DASR status at end of term.
? UC/CSU assumes risk should this action be blocked by law, regulation, or
3rd party action.
? Enron retains right in contract to choose source of electricity supply for
duration of existing contract term.
? Enron will work with UC/CSU to mitigate liability exposure (i.e., consider
entering into purchase agreement with utilities, etc.).

Potential liability during term (notional):  $_____ (60 day term);   $____(90
day term)

Potential liability at end of term if Enron is unable to return accounts to
utility supply status at end of term due to potential legislative,
regulatory, or other action or circumstance (notional):   $_____ (assuming 60
day term);   $____(assuming 90 day term)

It is envisioned that during this short term period that the regulatory and
legislative landscape will become clearer, allowing both parties to better
understand their exposure through the term of the contract and beyond.  Once
this clarity is achieved, it is agreed both parties will meet to discuss long
term solutions meeting the needs of both parties.

Please comment with concerns, ideas immediately as we will be back on the
phone with them shortly.

Thank you.

Tom


Sally,

Thanks for taking the time to meet with me today and telling me about the
exciting opportunities you have at North America.  I reviewed the
presentation that you  gave me and found myself already thinking about how to
make it happen.  I would very much like to work with you to make this a
reality.  Attached is a copy of my resume.  I look forward to continuing our
discussions next week.

Gay

Gay Mayeux
Vice President, Enron Broadband Services
Physical Location:  1400 Smith Street EB4620
                                      Houston, TX 77002
Email:  gay_mayeux@enron.net
Office: (713) 853-9905
Cell:     (713) 416-8821
Fax:     (713) 646-5737


GCP adjustments highlighted in red.

Rgds.

Samuel x3-9890
(GCP_Enron Networks)

From: Carol North/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/02/2001 03:58 PM
To: Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kelly Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron, Samuel
Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Adnan
Patel/ENRON@enronXgate, Bill D Hare/HOU/ECT@ect, Steve
Venturatos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Camille Gerard/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary G
Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya
Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Paul Radous/ENRON@enronXgate, Tom
Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Ken Curry/ENRON@enronXgate, Nicole Hunter/NA/Enron@Enron, Aparna
Rajaram/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:
Subject: Click Paper aprovals

Please see attached.


I will call you about this matter this week.

	Robert Quick
	07/13/2000 05:11 AM

		 To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Michael R Brown/LON/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Goboil Trading A/S

Just to notify you that we have a dispute with the above company regarding
purchase from Globoil of gas condensate. The issue in dispute is a point of
construction of the agreement. The amount in dispute is around USD500,000.
Michael has agreed that we use Linklaters as the litigation lawyers; Globoil
is using Herbert Smith. tks


Sara:

Thanks for passing along the below address to me.  The tour guide was very
nice, but a bit inexperienced and certainly not with a luxury car.  It was
good for a do it yourself tour if you already have an idea of what you want
to see.  It actually confirmed for me that, unless you really stay to become
involved with the people, Sao Paulo is a fairly shallow city historically and
socially.  I hear, however, that there are many interesting colonial cities
in Minas Gerais, and Rio is only a 45 minute flight away.

Hope all is well.

Mike

Ms. Sonia
"GO IN"
Office:  289-3814
Cell:    9211 5399

City Tour:  approx. 3 hrs.

1p.  R$ 75
2p  R$ 110


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Mitchell Taylor/Corp/Enron on
03/21/2000 05:49 PM ---------------------------

Francisco Pinto Leite@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
03/21/2000 05:38 PM

To:   Amit Walia@ECT
cc:   Mitchell Taylor/Corp/Enron@ENRON, fsayre@ei.enron.com, Randy
      Young/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject:  Confidential

Apparently our local counsel in Puerto Rico had a small "change of heart"
as to the transfer restrictions for San Juan Gas, Procaribe and Progasco.
Although the statute does not contain a change of control provision with
respect to the licenses, it appears that after carefully looking into this
issue, local counsel found out that the Puerto Rican authorities are taking
a very aggressive approach with respect to transfers of control of holders
of licenses.  Apparently the Puerto Rican authorities argue that the spirit
of the statute is to extend the requirement of prior authorization for
transfers of the licenses, to a change of control of the operator.  In his
response to Bill Weiland from V&E he advised that it would be more prudent
to request permission to change control of the company that holds the
license.

FPL


Sally - The following people will be the core of the EGM due diligence team:
Scott Earnest, Michelle Bruce, Sheila Glover, Kevin Sweeney and Michelle
Thomason.  Of course, we will utilize others as needed depending on the
demands of the transaction being reviewed.  Michelle and/or myself will
follow-up with you next week to discuss next steps to finalizing a template
and team for all of wholesale.


Timing is really tight, and am not entirely convinced of the value, but I'm wondering if we should perhaps have some sort of presence at this conference. . .

Dave

-----Original Message-----
From: J.P. Rosenfield [mailto:jprosenfield@CERA.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 10:25 PM
Subject: CERAWeek2002 - Special Notice

Dear CERA Members and Friends:

We wanted to extend an invitation for you to join us for CERAWeek 2002,
CERA's 21st Annual Executive Conference on "THE NEW FACE OF RISK: Energy
Strategies for a Changed World" to be held February 11-15, 2002 in
Houston, Texas.  Our
theme is particularly timely and important in light of the new
challenges to energy markets and the very significant questions over
future growth opportunities.  CERAWeek is the premiere annual gathering
of energy industry leaders offering insight into the energy future.

As you can see from the full agenda on our website at
http://www.cera.com/ceraweek, we have an extraordinary group of speakers
and an exciting and topical program.  CERAWeek will address the
strategic and investment implications of today's global geopolitical and
economic realignment, new pressures on competitive markets, and volatile
energy prices.

We wanted to be sure you were aware of some new options for CERAWeek
participation:

* Flexible Enrollment packages - You may choose to participate in a
2-day Oil & Gas program, 2-day Gas & Power program, or our 4-day Full
Conference Suite

* CERAWeek Online Premium Access - Extend the reach of CERAWeek within
your organization with live webcasts, post-session wrap up interviews,
and daily highlights summary videos

* Partnership Opportunities - CERAWeek offers visibility and brand
building through a variety of sponsorship opportunities at the event

To enroll to CERAWeek 2002 please click
http://www20.cera.com/ceraweek2002/register or contact CERA Registration
at register@cera.com or by phone at +1 617 497 6446 ext. 800.  We hope
you will join us in Houston.

Sincerely,

James Rosenfield
CERA Managing Director

**********************************************************************
Our relationship with you is very important to us.  Should you prefer
not to receive future e-mail notifications, please send a reply to
this message with "DoNotEmail" as the subject of your message.
( mailto:info@cera.com?subject=DoNotEmail )  Please indicate whether
you wish to be removed from the conference list or alternatively from
the list for any future CERA notifications.
**********************************************************************


Hey Scott,

Hope you had a good time at the game this weekend, despite the heat.  I just
wanted to see if you were still interested in trying to grab lunch this
week.  If you do, just let me know what day and time work best for you.

Thanks,
Susan


Dear Don,

I enjoyed your article. You are right, we are a little sensitive.  That's a natural reaction when something you are so proud of is criticized.  I must admit I almost e-mailed you after reading your pre-game article.  What irritates my sensitivities is when it is pointed out that NU players have had trouble with the law.  These episodes, misdeameanors or not are not something any husker fan is proud of.  Surely there are players in every program who have fights with their girlfriends, or who drink too much and don't have the sense to leave a party when asked.  My problem is that whenever a NU player messes up, it is news.  It's as if there is a Lincoln Journal Star reporter with an office in the Lincoln PD complete with scanners, just waiting for some "news" to break.  I don't think ISU or any other school has such a spotlight put on them.  College kids everywhere do such things and pay for them quietly.  I don't wish we knew about every infraction at every school.  It would be nice if reporters could put things in perspective and stick to the event they are covering.  This all started when we were the defending and still contending National Champions who had the leading Heisman candidate in the backfield.  The Lawrence Phillips issue back then was news because of the Heisman hype and because of the severity of his offense.  He became the posterboy for abuse of females, and perhaps rightfully so, but enough already.  Leave us alone until, God forbid, we end up with another Lawrence Phillips.

Before I ramble on about this sensitive issue.  Let me thank you for your post game article which was fair and balanced.  You are right, Most NU fans are good, a few of us are not good fans or role models.   NU fans continue to wish ISU and Iowa the best.  Most of us are happy to see the Iowa teams do well.  Take care.


The attached swaps have been delivered together with the proposal sheets to
Lisa Mellencamp.


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 12/13/2000
08:25 AM ---------------------------

"Jim Miller" <jraggie1@pdq.net> on 12/13/2000 07:07:54 AM
To: "Wayne Duncan" <Wayneduncan@hotmail.com>, "Tom Svec"
<tsvec@generalwelding.com>, "Steve Schmidt" <sschmidt@urjet.net>, "Reid
Harmon" <reid@gsihighway.com>, "Pete Miller (AOL)" <millerpw@aol.com>, "Pete
Miller" <pmiller@fciconnect.com>, "Paul Heidaker" <psheidaker@aol.com>, "Pat
Duncan" <wpduncanjr@aol.com>, "Mike Vineyard" <qcgi@qualitec.com>, "Mike. W.
Sowden" <Mike.W.Sowden@supervalu.com>, "Michael Murr"
<Michael.Murr@COMPAQ.com>, "Mcintyre" <mcintyre@tca.net>, "Julie Paxton"
<JuKaPa129@aol.com>, "Jim Lawler" <wb365@email.msn.com>, "Jesse Khangura"
<jskhangura@msn.com>, "Janey Sowden" <janebarb@aol.com>, "Holly Wright"
<hollyw@email.msn.com>, "Gene Stpierre" <Gene.Stpierre@COMPAQ.com>, "Fred
Valente" <fvalente@micro.ti.com>, "DAVID COOK" <DAVID.COOK@cfisd.net>,
"DARRON GIRON" <dgiron@ect.enron.com>, "Danny A Dequeant"
<Danny.Dequeant@cmcsg.com>, "CORINA DOMINGUEZ" <cdominguez@wbctx.com>, "Chris
Strong" <cstrong@strongpointe.net>, "Cheryl Sparkman"
<cheryl@keystoneexec.com>, "Carla Preston" <cdspreston@earthlink.net>, "Bob
Lanham" <blanham@wbctx.com>, "AKoebig" <AKoebig@aol.com>, "A. J. Sowden"
<ASowden@aol.com>
cc:
Subject:

 - xmas1.exe