-----Original Message-----
From: Anne-Marie Miser
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2001 11:39 AM
To: Jojo Shakerdge
Subject: FW: Rebecca Misetr is a bitch...

I am forwarding this because I don't know if you will get the other one or
not.  If you get it twice then delete the other one I guess.

-----Original Message-----
From: bitchalizer@theSpark.com [mailto:bitchalizer@theSpark.com]
Sent: Saturday, July 21, 2001 8:34 PM
To: amiser@natsource.com
Subject: Rebecca Misetr is a bitch...

 Or at least 20%% of her is. How do *we* know? She just took
 TheSpark's famous BITCH*TEST.

 So what about *you*? Is it true that you blame everyone but yourself for
 your problems?

 Your bitchiness seems dangerously high, but there's only one way
 to know for sure:

	  Take the BITCH*TEST
	  http://www.thespark.com/bitchtest

 Take the test, discover your inner (or outer) bitch, and then
 check your score against Rebecca Misetr's and all your other friends'.


Please see attached and reply to info@neptunerts.com
<mailto:info@neptunerts.com> .

 - NeptuneRTS Cover Letter.doc
 - NeptuneRTS Bidder's Catalog.pdf


Phyllis:
Our letter of credit person would be more comfortable if we deleted all of
the language that makes the LC transferable.  Are you okay with that?  If so,
are we ready to execute?

Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com

	lemelpe@NU.COM
	05/30/2001 03:00 PM

		 To: Carol.St.Clair@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: LOC Form

Carol:  I understand that we are still reviewing the attachment that lists
the open transactions.  How are you making out on the revised version of
the LOC?


I have talked with Rick Shapiro on this issue.  I think we will probably
using LeBoeuf on this issue. I will see if they can be on the call, but it
would be a good idea to have Mike on the call if he is available.

From: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON on 01/04/2001 06:44 PM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
To: Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Re: Brief Summary of Today's Activities in California (at Least Thus
Far)

Ron Carrol works at Bracewell and he handles a lot of our FERC-related PX and
ISO activity, including tariff activity.  Ron works for Dan Watkiss, who also
handles a lot of that work for us .


How was the Polo match? Did you catch the Sopranos season finale? A little disappointing if you ask me. I worked out yesterday and I can't straighten my arms. A little uncomfortable. Bring on the Advil. Talk to you later...

Chris


Mr. Boytinck:

Pursuant to Jason Biever's request, I am attaching, for your review, a draft Master Agreement between Garden City Plaza Ltd. and Enron Canada Corp.  Please do not hesitate to contact either Anne Koehler, Senior Counsel (713/853-3448; anne.koehler@enron.com) or me with any questions or comments.  We look forward to hearing your comments.

Marie Heard
Senior Legal Specialist
Enron North America Corp.
Phone:  (713) 853-3907
Fax:  (713) 646-3490
marie.heard@enron.com


Pam

Thanks

Yes, please, send me the E-mail addresses.

Vince

Pamela Vande Krol Castro <castro@rice.edu> on 01/26/2001 10:40:17 AM
To: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
cc:
Subject: MGMT 656

Here are your latest rosters. Let me know if you would like the spreadsheet
with their e-mail addresses as well! - Pam (6223)
 - 656.doc


---------------------- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 12/20/99 12:52 PM
---------------------------

Leslie Hansen
12/20/99 11:15 AM
To: Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Forster/LON/ECT@ECT, Bob
Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Edmund Cooper/LON/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth
Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: F/U re European power trading by U.S. counterparties

I have spoken with Edmund Cooper to follow up regarding access to European
power products by U.S. counterparties.  Edmund and Justin Boyd have discussed
the issue and determined that they would like to follow an approach similar
to our approach for U.S. power products.  U.S. counterparties should be
granted read-only access to European power products.  If a specific U.S.
counterparty wants to trade European power products, the request for access
can be examined on a case-by-case basis.

Leslie


COLUMBIA GAS TRANSMISSION CORPORATION
                        NOTICE TO ALL INTERESTED PARTIES
                                  JUNE 01, 2001

Notice ID: 2771
5 - NO RESPONSE REQUIRED

SUBJECT: REVISED - CAPACITY UPDATE EFFECTIVE FOR MONDAY, JUNE 4, 2001

             CHANGES ARE INDICATED WITH AN *

Effective Monday, June 4, 2001, capacities will be as follows:

Excess MDWQ              Available +
ISS Withdrawals          Available
SIT Withdrawals          Available
Imbalance Drawdowns      Available
PAL Lends/Unparks        Available

Excess MDIQ              Not Available +
ISS Injections           Not Available
SIT Injections           Not Available
Imbalance Paybacks       Not Available
PAL Parks/Loan Paybacks  Not Available

+ Call Gas Control 24 hours in advance at (304) 357-2606 to request approval.

Receipt capacity will be as follows:

TENNESSEE:

Brinker (B12)            20,000
Broad Run (B9)          450,000
Cambridge (B10)          10,000
Dungannon (B11)          40,000
Highland (B17)           25,000
Milford (B18)            30,000
North Greenwood (B22)    10,000
Unionville (B15)         75,000

TEXAS EASTERN:

Delmont (C16)                 0
Eagle (C22)              30,000
Hooker (C9)              25,000
Pennsburg (C23)          50,000
Windridge (C12)          60,000

NATIONAL FUEL:

Independence (M1)        10,000
Ellwood City (L1)        10,000

TRANSCO:

Downingtown (E3)          5,000
Emporia I (E13)         120,000 *
Rockville (E2)           65,000
Dranesville (E1)         25,000

ALGONQUIN:

Ramapo (R1)              50,000

ANR:

Paulding/Cecil          100,000
(F1, A2)

LEBANON AGGREGATE       225,000
(A4, F2, C4, D3)

TOLEDO AGGREGATE        225,000
(A3, F4, 734462)

COLUMBIA GULF:
(801)

TCO-Leach             2,218,000

Internal point non-firm capacity will be as follows:

Lanham                No Restrictions

Delivery capacity (non-firm) will be as follows:

TRANSCO:

Martins Creek (MA 21)    25,000
Young Woman's Creek       5,000
   (MA 36)

ALGONQUIN:

Hanover (MA 22)         143,000

EQUITRANS:

Fallen Timber (MA 35)    35,000
(MLI K1)

Waynesburg-Rhinehart     30,000
(MA 26) (MLI K2)

OPT-30 will be available in all market areas.
OPT-60 will be available in all market areas.

Market Area delivery capacity (non-firm) will be as follows:

Operating Area 1
     Market Area 33       No Restrictions
     Market Area 34       No Restrictions

Operating Area 2
     Market Area 20       No Restrictions

Operating Area 3
     Market Area 15       No Restrictions
     Market Area 16       No Restrictions
     Market Area 17       No Restrictions
     Market Area 18       No Restrictions
     Market Area 19       No Restrictions

Operating Area 4
     Market Area 21       No Restrictions
     Market Area 22       No Restrictions
     Market Area 23       No Restrictions
     Market Area 24       No Restrictions
     Market Area 25       No Restrictions
     Market Area 29       No Restrictions

Operating Area 5
     Market Area 02       No Restrictions
     Market Area 07       No Restrictions

Operating Area 6
     Market Area 10       No Restrictions
     Market Area 11       No Restrictions
     Market Area 12       No Restrictions
     Market Area 13       No Restrictions
     Market Area 14       No Restrictions

Operating Area 7
     Market Area 01       No Restrictions
     Market Area 03       No Restrictions
     Market Area 04       No Restrictions
     Market Area 05       No Restrictions
     Market Area 06       No Restrictions
     Market Area 08       No Restrictions
     Market Area 09       No Restrictions

Operating Area 8
     Market Area 26       No Restrictions
     Market Area 27       No Restrictions
     Market Area 32       No Restrictions
     Market Area 35       No Restrictions
     Market Area 36       No Restrictions
     Market Area 38       No Restrictions
     Market Area 39       No Restrictions
     Market Area 40       No Restrictions

Operating Area 10
     Market Area 28       No Restrictions
     Market Area 30       No Restrictions
     Market Area 31       No Restrictions

If you have any questions, please contact your Account
Representative.


Are you planning to attend the planning committee meeting in Monmouth next
week?  I'm setting up dinner with Doc (instead of the Private Dining Room
affair) in case you're interested.


Everyone in the following gorups, now have access to the West Desk Support
Web Site at http://westdesksupport. The UserName is the same as your NT / W2K
Login UserName. And the password is the same as the username. Please use this
site to log problems with CAPS, Excel, Enpower / FSP, network problems, or
anything else that IT Needs to get involved in. Those of you that have logged
in under the old username / Password system have also been changed to the new
system.

The Groups are:

Real Time
Pre Sched
Volume Management
Risk
Middle Marketing
Power Traders

Thank you for your time.

Michael Tully
Application Support


The following is a brief summary of the status of our current SCADA
capabilities on the Lost Creek pipeline:

 Madden West
MDS Radio installed and functioning properly
polling pressure and flow data correctly
chromatograph appears to be functioning correctly
setpoint capabilities have not yet been tested.  We will need to have a field
operator present on-site before performing this test.
EFM data collection is being configured to correspond to ROCLINK, rather than
our standard Enron MODBUS load, that is installed on the ROC
polling H2S and H2O levels, but correct registers have not been verified yet

Fred Novotny
MDS radio installed and functioning properly
polling pressure and flow data correctly
chromatograph appears to be functioning correctly
setpoint capabilities have not yet been tested.  We will need to have a field
operator present on-site before performing this test
EFM data collection is being configured to correspond to ROCLINK, rather than
our standard Enron MODBUS load, that is installed on the ROC
polling H2S and H2O levels, but correct registers have not been verified yet

Keith Baker
MDS radio installed and was functioning properly
lost communications with this site yesterday.  Elkhorn has been notified and
will have someone onsite today to inspect the ROC and comm package.  In
addition, I requested that the dispatched person take a laptop along to
assist our IT group in confirming the register configuration on the RTU so
that we can verify that we have correct H2S and H2O level readings at all of
our meters.
setpoint capabilities have not been tested.  We will need to have a field
operator present on-site before perfoming this test
EFM data collection is being configured to correspond to ROCLINK, rather than
our standard Enron MODBUS load, that is installed on the ROC

Lysite Production Office
MDS master radio and omnidirectional antenna installed and functioning
properly
UPS system installed
POTS service to Paneltec installed and functioning
CDPD service on hold awaiting decisions regarding 20/20

Lost Creek Plant Inlet
POTS service to ROC installed and functioning
polling pressure and flow data correctly
chromatograph appears to be functioning properly
setpoint capabilities have not been tested.  This ROC controls inlet flow by
modifying suction pressure on the C-101 compressor unit, so it appears that
it must be tested with the unit operating and personnel on-site

Lost Creek Plant Delta V
Developing screens for Gas Control to view plant operations
Have not installed Paneltec and RS-232 cable to enable polling at this time

CIG/WIC Interconnect Meters
CIG/WIC Access agreement has gone through Enron legal, but is being reviewed
by Insurance at this time
Once this has been approved, we have to have CIG/WIC agree to the new
document to grant us access to the site
Will have to construct new RTU building and install power, UPS, RTU, MDS
radio and antenna at site to enable polling

Lost Creek Plant Aux Control Bldg.
Have not moved primary polling of all devices into the Aux. Control Bldg.
Awaiting 20/20 decisions to determine routing and place order for 56K
dedicated line to site
Once clearance is granted, we will need to order and install a xyplex and hub
in building.
Assuming that we go with CDPD coverage at the north end of the system, this
will serve as the collation point for all incoming/outgoing SCADA traffic via
the 56K line
Tower and antenna to be installed on site to enable polling of the CIG/WIC RTU

Sand Draw
We have good cellular coverage at this site, and wish to use cellular service
to poll this RTU
Because RTU is in a Class 1, Div. 2 area, trying to locate a compliant
cellular package or go with cellular package capable of operating under WY
winter and summer temperature conditions that can be installed external to
the meter building

Beaver Creek
This site is on hold with regard to SCADA polling at this time

If you have questions regarding this summary, please contact me at x36530.

Regards,
Chris Sonneborn
ENA Upstream Services
Facility Planning


If the deal is confirmable as a deal that came across on CES's books
[reported as an active deal by CES to ENA], then the deal is a CES deal (CES
- Statoil). BUT, if this is a newly discovered deal - - - - we will need to
confirm with Risk (Mark Breese) to ensure proper booking & that the deal has
been quantified; OR if it is a newly negotiated deal or a deal finalized
after 1/1/00, then it should be entered without the CES prefix (statoil).
Based on the production dates of deal# 280185 and #226563, as combine with
the fact and that I can not find anything in the CES deal listing (CES
'books') specifying a 333/day deal with Statoil I am again hesitant to use
the CES prefix (nor can I confirm that deal #226563 should have been entered
with the CES prefix.

John, can you fill in the missing details?

Cyndie

Chris Germany@ECT
05/25/2000 04:19 PM
To: John M Singer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David Oliver/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert
Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dick Jenkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cyndie
Balfour-Flanagan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Elizabeth L Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Molly
Johnson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wade R Price/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Joan Veselack/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joann Collins/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Local Production for June

John, I took the volumes on deal 226556 to 0 for the term of the deal
starting June 1.  This is the purchase from Belden & Blake behind NYSEG.

I changed the volume on deal 226563 from 1 dth/day to 1500 dth/day.  This is
the purchase from StatOil at CPA.  The price on this deal is NX1 + .434 and
the price on John's worksheet is NX1 + .54 (per MCF).  John, is this price
adjusted for dth??

I created deal 280185, purchase from StatOil, volume of 333 day, the price is
NX1+ $.56 PER MCF.  This is a purchase of local production behind the
citygate.  David, this deal probably needs to be hedged in Sitara.
Cindy - deal 226563 is a purchase from CES - Statoil Energy.  I set up deal
280185 with the same counterparty.  This deal should have been in the system
effective 1/1/2000.  According to Elizabeth, we should not use the CES -
StatOil Energy.  It doesn't matter to me how its set up, however, this deal
should have been in the system from Jan and it is the same type of deal as
deal 226563.

I changed the volume on deal 226747 from 1 dth to 1100 dth/day.  This is a
purchase from Questar and it is also local production behind CPA.
John, there are 3 deals for Questar, the other 2 deals have volumes of 0
right now.  Can you tell me how the volume should be split out for pricing
purposes?

Molly, I created deal 280132, FOM priced sale to CES.  This deal will be
matched with the CPA local production deals.

Let me know if anyone has any questions.

Thanks
cg 3-4743

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 05/25/2000 02:41
PM ---------------------------

Chris Germany
05/24/2000 05:26 PM
To: hboyd@columbiaenergygroup.com, Angie Zeman/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joan
Veselack/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joann Collins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robert
Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cynthia Franklin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Meredith
Mitchell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Molly Johnson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Scott Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John M Singer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Dick
Jenkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT,
dkinney@columbiaenergygroup.com, cdalpho@columbiaenergygroup.com,
jporte1@columbiaenergygroup.com, Wade R Price/HOU/ECT@ECT (bcc: Chris
Germany/HOU/ECT)
Subject: Local Production for June

Please send this email to anyone that may need to see it.  I'm sure I left
someone out.

This is citygate gas ENA will sell to CES for June.  This will reduce the
numbers on the sheet Doug sent us yesterday.

East Ohio Gas on CNG
10,000 dth/ month from Power Gas Marketing

CPA on TCO
500 dth/day from Power Gas Marketing
1,833 dth/day from StatOil
1,100 dth/day from Questa - Note:  this is an estimated volume.  We should
know the actual volume in the next day or so.

Note:  CES is not taking any Carnagie gas at CPA.

National Fuel
250 dth/day from Belden & Blake.  The deal expires 6/30/2000.

Equitrans
All of the Equitrans is production or pool gas on the pipeline.  ENA
nominates this gas.  CES still has a citygate load of 1,280 dth/day for June
on Equitrans so the production gas will be delivered to CES.

CES will not be receiving any local production behind Peoples or NYSEG.


Thurs of next week looks good

	"Ileana Blanco" <iblanco@bracepatt.com>
	04/16/2001 04:58 PM

		 To: <RSander@ECT.Enron.Com>
		 cc: "Stephen Crain" <scrain@bracepatt.com>
		 Subject: Lunch tomorrow

Crain can't make it.  Do you want to reschedule for next week, Wednesday or
Thursday or do you want to make it just the three of us?  Or invite Tony? Or
someone else?  I am up for anything that you want to do.  Ileana


That's what he goes by.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	trish.lindloff@weil.com@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, November 08, 2001 4:47 PM
To:	Taylor, Mark E (Legal)
Subject:	RE: Wrapco

Do you have Mike McConnell's full name?

**********NOTE**********
The information contained in this email message is intended only
for use of the individual or entity named above.  If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or
agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you
have received this communication in error, please immediately
notify us by telephone (214-746-7700), and destroy the original
message. Thank you.


This has been changed.

Kerri Thompson@ENRON
11/16/2000 04:03 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: 458802

broker has 25 mw instead of 50mw


Richard, what is the status of this issue?  Thanks. Lynn
---------------------- Forwarded by Lynn Blair/ET&S/Enron on 06/24/2001 07:56 PM ---------------------------

Richard Hanagriff
06/07/2001 11:36 AM
To:	Dan Rittgers/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:	Kimberly Watson/ET&S/Enron, Lindy Donoho/ET&S/Enron, Rick Dietz/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lynn Blair/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Shelley Corman/ET&S/Enron, Sandra Hrna/HOU/ECT, Terry Kowalke/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Amy Mulligan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject:	Re: Compressor Fuel Consumed in Colorado

Attached are the volumes and related values(San Juan index) for the La Plata "A" Fuel from September 1996 through April 2001.   We need to meet to discuss the issues related to this potential liability of $367k(total volume * SJ index * .05) and subsequent liability.

From:	Dan Rittgers/ENRON@enronXgate on 06/06/2001 12:17 PM
To:	Kimberly Watson/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:	Sandra Hrna/ENRON@enronXgate, Richard Hanagriff/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rich Jolly/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject:	Compressor Fuel Consumed in Colorado

I am in the Transaction Tax Section.  I talked to Rich Jolly.  He said you might have the volume, BTU and value of gas that was consumed in our Colorado compressor
station(s) since the acquisition of the La Plata facility.  Can you call me at Ext. 35734 so we can discuss the details of this request?

<Embedded StdOleLink>


---------------------- Forwarded by Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT on 02/03/2000
11:27 AM ---------------------------

Judy Hernandez on 11/01/99 05:08:09 PM
To: Amber Limas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amber Ebow/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shirlet
Williams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michelle Neville/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tara L
Lewis/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Angela Barnett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Albert Escamilla/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christopher Hargett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa
Shoemake/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: So cute!!

---------------------- Forwarded by Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT on 11/01/99 05:04
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Maria Sandoval                           11/01/99 03:01 PM

To: Margo Reyna/HOU/EES@EES, Nichole Gunter/HOU/EES@EES, Andrea R
Guillen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phenicia Olivier/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice
Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pamela
Sonnier/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cassandra S Dutton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cecilia
Olvera/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lorraine Becker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Irena D Hogan/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Angela Henn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melba Lozano/HOU/ECT@ECT, Katherine Renee
Reyna/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chantelle Villanueva/HOU/ECT@ECT,
yolanda.sandoval@mwk.com, patty.soria@mwk.com, mcastillo@metromkt.com,
elizabeth.gutierrez@eott.com, Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda
Barreda/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Elizabeth Soto/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: So cute!!

---------------------- Forwarded by Maria Sandoval/HOU/ECT on 11/01/99 03:00
PM ---------------------------

Yolanda Sandoval <Yolanda.Sandoval@Halliburton.com> on 10/29/99 06:24:24 AM
To: "'Castillo, Margaret'" <MCastillo@metromkt.com>, Maria
Sandoval/HOU/ECT@ECT, "'Tony Nunez'" <anthony.nunez@chase.com>, Sylvia
Balderas <Sylvia.Balderas@Halliburton.com>, Ursula Tovar
<Ursula.Tovar@Halliburton.com>, Charmane Whatley
<Charmane.Whatley@Halliburton.com>, Charlene Olson
<Charlene.Olson@Halliburton.com>
cc:
Subject: FW: So cute!!

Yolanda Sandoval
KBR Legal Dept.
713-753-5986
yolanda.sandoval@halliburton.com

 <<DOGS_1.PPS>>

 - DOGS_1.PPS


Audrey, I have no off duty time to report.  Thanks, Kim.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Robertson, Audrey
Sent:	Thursday, March 14, 2002 12:28 PM
To:	Donoho, Lindy; Lindberg, Lorraine; Lohman, TK; Lokay, Michelle; McConnell, Mark; Watson, Kimberly; Y'barbo, Paul
Subject:	Time Reports Due Tomorrow

 Please submit....

adr

Audrey D. Robertson
Transwestern Pipeline Company
email address:  audrey.robertson@enron.com
(713) 853-5849
(713) 646-2551 Fax


fyi
----- Forwarded by Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT on 03/01/2001 09:23 AM -----

	Susan Bailey
	03/01/2001 08:55 AM

		 To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T
Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: SWAP FORMS -- Multiproduct/Multiaffiliate Guaranty

All,

Carol asked that I provide you all with a "redlined" and "clean" version of
the updated form of Guaranty  to be used by Enron Corp. and a Counterparty,
for "multiproduct/multiaffiliate" deals.

Attached are the forms

I. Enron Corp.

II. Counterparty

Cordially,
Susan S. Bailey
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, Suite 3806A
Houston, Texas 77002
Phone: (713) 853-4737
Fax: (713) 646-3490
E:mail:  Susan.Bailey@enron.com


Hi,

I figured something must be occupying your time other than answering
non-business e-mail.

You guys must all be getting double salaries for doing 2 jobs each. ----
right? (chuckle).

If Tom really lets you take the time off for the baby and if you really have
the time; lunch would be great. Just give me a call. Only if all the ifs
really allow you the time.

Is Craig ok?? I hope.

I would be glad to help with your sprinkler system. My sharpshooter is older
than you are, but I imagine it is built a little better. My requested wages
for that sort of work would make renting a trencher very cheap for you. I
would be happy to come by and keep an eye on the cold beer. That would be
free of charge.

I'm having a cable modem installed Monday. Supposed to be 50-70 times faster
than what I have. I do way to much jumping around to run off this slow modem.
I can then dump my other phone line. Actually will end up spending less for
more speed. I love technology.

Thanks for the info on the stock option. That is the closing price as of
1/18/00, which is right before the jump. very nice of management. I like to
know the number to see what might be affecting the price.

Well good luck on the extra job and give our best to Tonya ---- Not much
longer to go...........

Ken

 - att1.htm


We cannot extend #151203.  I created a new deal for January 200 forward
(#212401).

Julie - Will you attach a contract.

D

   Aimee Lannou                03/06/2000 02:47 PM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey Neuweiler/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Karen Lindley/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Feedback Error - 1/00

Could one of you please extend deal # 151203 for meter 1595?  This deal
expired 12/31/99.

Thanks.

Aimee
---------------------- Forwarded by Aimee Lannou/HOU/ECT on 03/06/2000 02:45
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Karen Lindley @ ENRON                           03/06/2000 09:58 AM

To: Aimee Lannou/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Feedback Error - 1/00

Aimee,

There is a feedback error on swing meter 981595, deal number 151203 for
January 2000.  POPS and MOPS systems match, however in checking in Sitara,
the deal number attached expired 12/31/99.

I am not sure you are the correct person to address this with, if not, please
let me know.  If you can fix this problem, please do so and let me know.

Thanks and let me know if you need any addtional data as well.

Karen
X58381


To whom it may concern:

E-request 58321 was sent on 9/5 with high priority status. I have not heard back regarding this request, and its approval is becoming increasingly important. Bill Williams III, manager of the West Real Time group, needs to be able to move important e-mail documents from his overloaded inbox into public folders in order to simply send new messages or store incoming mail.

Could you please let me know if there is more information I can provide regarding this request and give me an estimated time of its approval?

Thank you,
Kate Symes
Real Time Trading Support
503-464-3939


Please see Buzz' feedback below and let me know asap what your conclusions are.  nb

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Smith, Buzz
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 11:36 AM
To:	Bastida, Nancy
Subject:	RE: FPU

I don't think we should give out section 11 rights here.  There were none before.
Physically, firm deliveries could be shifted out of this point, but none in.
He can shift on an alternate basis.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bastida, Nancy
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 11:10 AM
To:	Smith, Buzz
Subject:	FW: FPU
Importance:	High

Buzz, please give me your feedback on this situation.  nb
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bastida, Nancy
Sent:	Wednesday, January 02, 2002 2:26 PM
To:	Trevino, Linda; King Jr., Frazier; Lokey, Teb; Cramer, James
Cc:	Eldridge, Dale
Subject:	FPU
Importance:	High

Chris Snyder with FPU called and asked if the New Smyrna point, poi 16160 on contract 100740 (which is the only delivery point on that contract that they permanently acquired through capacity release) could be made a division.  The point was acquired through a permanent capacity release transaction as a single point.

The problem is that they requested to combine this point into their current dpoa, contract 5002 that has points behind divisions.  The allocation reports he gets do not reflect this point since it is not in a division.  Can we make a point a division just so the reports can "pick up" the point?  Chris also mentioned that he does not want this point in a separate dpoa because he wants to be able to take advantage of the section 11 rights with their other delivery points on their dpoa.

Frazier and Teb, please let me know if we can do this so that we can make the appropriate changes in our system.  nb


----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 09/01/2000 11:02 AM -----

	"JOHN G KLAUBERG" <JKLAUBER@LLGM.COM>
	09/01/2000 08:28 AM

		 To: <Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Infineum

Richard:  I must admit I feel like a real pain in the ___ since I know how
much stuff you have going on, but I wanted to see if we could set up a call
with you with some of our folks working on the Infineum lawsuit so that we
are in a position to file responsive papers in the case shortly.  As we
initially discussed, the factual situation relating to East Coast's history
of dealings with Infineum (formerly Exxon) is incredibly complex as are the
various contractual and other documents.  Jon Mostel, our principal
transactions lawyer who has been working for more than a year with East Coast
Power on the contract with Tosco (i.e., Bayway Refining Company), has been
instrumental in providing the factual, legal and regulatory predicates for
the East Coast deal and how Infineum fits into or is affected by that.  We
have given significant thought over the past few weeks to the underlying
issues in the case, the relevant precedent as well as the likely strategic
moves at this point, taking into account the particular federal judge
assigned to the case.  We would like to walk through our thought process with
you to obtain your input on the case strategy at this point, particularly if
Enron has a general policy or pre-disposition on the litigation side to go
one way or the other from a procedural standpoint subject, of course, to the
specific facts present in the case.  Could you let me know if there may be a
convenient  time when you could speak with us.  You could call me or Steve
Levitsky (212) 424-8309, one of my litigator colleagues here in New York who
is assisting Stuart in preparing the case.  As I noted in my v-mails, Stuart
recently has been involved in an ongoing trial in Federal Court in New Jersey
and Steve has been taking the laboring oar on the necessary research and
factual investigation and is fully familiar with the case.  Hopefully, we
could do it before next Wednesday, but if it would be of any help I will be
in your offices next Wednesday and with a little juggling I could probably
visit you in your office sometime in the a.m. or afternoon and then plug our
litigators in by phone.  Perhaps you could reply to this and let me know what
might work for you.  Thanks.  I hope that you have a good holiday weekend.
John

"This e-mail, including attachments, contains information that is
confidential and it may be protected by the attorney/client or other
privileges.  This e-mail, including attachments, constitutes non-public
information intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s).  If
you are not an intended recipient, please delete this e-mail, including
attachments and notify me by return mail, e-mail or by phone at 212
424-8125.  The unauthorized use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction
of the e-mail, including attachments, is prohibited and may be unlawful.

John Klauberg
LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae, L.L.P.
212 424-8125
jklauber@llgm.com


Yeah, gave the disc to Prentice.  Also (and don't ask me how this happened,
cuz I couldn't tell ya), Cameron put the battery to her camera (I think?) in
my shirt pocket.  I gave that to Prentice last night, too.  So she's got both
of them.  Thanks a million (or at least $736) for the check.

Best,
Jeff


Ain't that the truth.  Wait just a minute, I took Monday off and I think I'm taking Friday of next week off.  Never mind.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Abigail Maines" <MainesA@NATFUEL.COM>@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, January 10, 2002 7:28 AM
To:	Germany, Chris; Espey, Darren
Subject:	Capacity for the 11th

Five day work weeks are VERY long.  I haven't had one in a few weeks.

Space from Niagara to Leidy is available for 35,000 dth.  Excess injection or IAS payback is available for 20,000 dth and excess withdrawals can increase by 100,000 dth for tomorrow's gas day.

Abigail
716-857-6847
http://nfg.natfuel.com/gsweb1/market/DailyCapDesk/DlyCpDesk.htm

QUOTE OF THE DAY
=========================
"Do we really want to bid for the games in the future? It's a
valid question. I believe the money is well spent; it makes
a great statement for peace. But is it a good investment?"
-MITT ROMNEY, president of the Salt Lake City Olympic organizing
committee, on the cost of holding the Games in the United
States.

Good Question?


You're the best!

	Teresa Smith@ENRON
	06/15/2000 01:04 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Outercurve Technologies - Request for EOL NDA

I will endevour to get you this information this afternoon.

-Teresa

From: Tana Jones@ECT on 06/15/2000 12:40 PM
To: Teresa Smith/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Outercurve Technologies - Request for EOL NDA

To prepare an NDA for you I will need the following information:

1.  The correct legal name of the counterparty
2.  Whether the agreement is bilateral (both parties providing confidential
information) or one-way (where only Enron is providing confidential
information).  Our preference is to use the Enron protected party form since
it is written more in our favor.
3.  The nature and/or use of the information being provided.
4.  The address of the counterparty
5.  The phone and fax number of the counterparty

Once I have all this I can prepare your NDA in short order.

	Teresa Smith@ENRON
	06/15/2000 10:59 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Outercurve Technologies - Request for EOL NDA

Tana,

Please can you forward a copy of the EOL NDA to Alexandria Khalil at
Outercurve Technologies (akhalil@outercurve.com).  Please can you advise when
you have received a signed copy.

Thanks

-Teresa


Start Date: 10/10/01; HourAhead hour: 4;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001101004.txt

Error retrieving HourAhead price data - process continuing...


--- Automatic Notification System ( Request #: ECTH-4UMT24 )
Requested For: John Griffith
Requested By:  Ina Rangel

Your order (see below) has been assigned to Brent Spiller. Technician will
contact you for information and delivery time. Please contact the technician
if you have any question.

EN 800 PIII/15GB/128MB/40X/W2K
128MB F/EN 800MHZ INSTALLED IN DESKTOP


Vince Kaminski,

I am one of the Stanford students that you interviewed last October.
I really apologize for contacting you that late, but for
some reason when I wrote the email that I transcribe below I did not send
it, and just realized about that until now.

Also, I want to thank you again for opening the
possibility of a summer internship at Enron.

Regards,

Jorge Picazo

> Vince Kaminski,
>
> I am one of the students that you interviewed at Stanford University
> last October.
>
> During our meeting I asked for the possibility of an internship position
> at Enron  during this summer, and you asked me to send you an email
> by February.
>
> However and after a long talk with my advisor,  I have decided to focus
> on my academic research during the summer, and I am writing to let you
> know about my decision.
>
> In any case, I really want to thank you for opening the possibility of a
> summer internship at Enron. If my academic duties had not keep me at
> Stanford, I am sure that it would have been a great experience.
>
> thanks anyway,
>
> Jorge Picazo
>
>
>
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > My name is Vince Kaminski and I am in charge of Quantitative Research at
Enron
> > Corp. I shall visit the Stanford Campus on October 21 and 22 (Thursday and
> > Friday)
> > and hope to talk to a number of faculty members about recruiting Stanford
> > graduates for Enron.
> >
> > I shall be accompanied by two other Enron employees: Greg Whalley, a
Stanford
> > graduate, Head of Risk Management at Enron and my boss, and Celeste
Roberts,
> > Head of our Associate/Analyst program.
> >
> > If you are interested in meeting with me and two other members of the
Enron
> > team  to talk about opportunities at Enron, send me a message to two
E-mail
> > addresses: vkaminski@aol.com (home) and vkamins@enron.com (office). I
shall
> > send you in the beginning of the next week information about the time and
> > place of the meeting.
> >
> > You can also reach me at (713) 853 3848.
> >
> > Vince Kaminski
> >

=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*
=
   Jorge A. Picazo Hidalgo

Ph.D. candidate    Adress: 1600 Villa St Apt 391
Department of Statistics                 94041, Mountain View CA
Stanford University
Sequoia Hall rm 237   Phone: (650) 965-4119

M.S.      email:  jpicazo@leland.Stanford.edu
Department of Engineering-Economic  jpicazo@stat.Stanford.edu
Systems and Operations Research
Stanford University
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*
=


Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 08/29/00 08:08 AM -----

	"Cheri Strouse" <STROC@andrews-kurth.com>
	08/25/00 05:39 PM

		 To: <alan.quaintance@enron.com>, <Brenda.L.Funk@enron.com>,
<carol.st.clair@enron.com>, <charles.delacey@enron.com>,
<Clement.abrams@enron.com>, <David.roland@enron.com>,
<gina.karathanos@enron.com>, <Joel.ephross@enron.com>,
<tina.livingston@enron.com>, <Trevor.randolph@enron.com>,
<trushar.patel@enron.com>, <mniebruegge@mayerbrown.com>,
<tellwood@mayerbrown.com>, <eawilburn@prickett.com>, <Tamullen@prickett.com>,
<kenton@rlf.com>, <mark.wolf@us.cibc.com>, <mercedes.arango@us.cibc.com>,
<schottla@us.cibc.com>, <Aroberts@wilmingtontrust.com>
		 cc: "David Barbour" <BARBD@andrews-kurth.com>, "MURIEL McFARLING"
<MCFAM@andrews-kurth.com>, "SCOTT OLSON" <OLSOS@andrews-kurth.com>
		 Subject: Re:Project Tahiti

Attached please find the Sale and Auction Agreement for the Fiji Z Class B
Interest and the Bali Trust Agreement.

The Sale and Auction Agreement is marked against the Sale and Auction
Agreement from the Hawaii 125-0, McGarrett Series B transaction and the Bali
Trust Agreement is marked against the Alchemy Trust Agreement.

Please note that the attached documents are in Word Perfect.  A subsequent
email with the documents in Microsoft Word will follow.

Please fax comments to David Barbour and Muriel McFarling at 214-659-4401 by
Monday, August 28th.

If you have any questions, please contact David Barbour at 214-659-4444.

B. Scott Olson
Andrews & Kurth L.L.P.
1717 Main Street
Suite 3700
Dallas, Texas 75201
Direct: 214.659.4443
Fax: 214.659.4832

 - 255084 COMPARISON AGAINST MCGARRETT SERIES B.wpd
 - 255146 COMPARISON 220406 VER 7.WPD


Louise,

Will you have a chance early on Monday to discuss this?  If so, just give a call when you are ready.

Thanks,

Don

-----Original Message-----
From: Kitchen, Louise
Sent: Friday, November 23, 2001 4:21 PM
To: Miller, Don (Asset Mktg)
Subject: Re: Vitro Project

Surely we can cover this from within Virgo's team?
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld


Enjoy!
 - 20011203ERCOT_LOAD.XLS
 - 20011203ERCOT_FLOW.XLS


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 11/21/2000
12:38 PM ---------------------------

Dawn C Kenne
11/21/2000 08:42 AM
To: "Amanda Barnard" <ajbarnard@houston.rr.com>, Jennifer Baer
<jbaer1@maine.rr.com>, Pam B Boxx/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michelle Bythewood
<rbwood@ix.netcom.com>, "Bythewood, Richard" <rbythewood@txi.com>, "derek
campbell" <derek.campbell@paslode.com>, PMDESMAR@earthlink.net, Linda J
Ewing/HOU/ECT@ECT, "garynkay" <GARYWGARRETT@email.msn.com>, Darron C
Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, kristi.giron@cfisd.net, HeightsHappy@aol.com @ ENRON,
"Keeling, Ingelisa" <ikeeling@velaw.com>, "B. Kenne" <yona_edoda@yahoo.com> @
ENRON, "don e kenne" <donkit@tnaccess.com> @ ENRON, Mark Troyer
<mtroyer@swbell.net>, "Ray Vincent" <raylvincent@hotmail.com> @ ENRON, Eric
Wardle/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary Wilson <gxwilson@us.oracle.com>, "Tracey Wilson"
<twilson@officefurnishings.com> @ ENRON, Jason Wolfe/NA/Enron@ENRON, Ed
Zajicek <e.zajicek@pentasafe.com>, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor
Guggenheim/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matt Motsinger/HOU/ECT@ECT, Torrey
Moorer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Fw: GREAT BUMPER STICKER

---------------------- Forwarded by Dawn C Kenne/HOU/ECT on 11/21/2000 08:41
AM ---------------------------

"Max & Bev Fledderjohann" <maxnbev@wesnet.com> on 11/20/2000 10:23:12 PM
To: "Jim" <JUNAILBENDER@aol.com>, "GARY" <GARYWGARRETT@EMAIL.MSN.COM>,
<DAWN.C.Kenne@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Fw: GREAT BUMPER STICKER

-----Original Message-----
From: The Thiemans <tthieman@nktelco.net>
To: Shirley Longworth <johntl@bright.net>; Nancy Roettger
<lroettger@woh.rr.com>; Margene Howell <Daisydog66@aol.com>; Marcia Beneda
<Marshy54@aol.com>; Judy and Larry Looker <llooker@infinet.com>; Jenny and
Doug Combs <ccombs@voyager.net>; Gen Conradi <gen1@bright.net>; Bev
Fledderjohnn <maxnbev@wesnet.com>; Becky Johnson
<bjohnson1@accesstoledo.com>
Date: Monday, November 20, 2000 2:55 PM
Subject: Fw: GREAT BUMPER STICKER

>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Suchland, Bartt <BSuchland@thieman.com>
>To: Aaron Powers (E-mail) <apowers@tampabay.rr.com>; Annette (E-mail)
><anetrodnreel@hotmail.com>; Chris Keller (E-mail) <cbkeller@bright.net>;
Dan
>Suchland (E-mail) <suchsnow@aol.com>; Dar (E-mail) <daltman@blueridge.net>;
>'David Suchland' (E-mail) <dsuchland@yahoo.com>; Eric Koesters (E-mail)
><eric_koesters@motoman.com>; Holdren (E-mail)
><kelly_holdren@precision-strip.com>; Jay Jerger (E-mail)
><jerger@bgnet.bgsu.edu>; Jim A. Jerger (E-mail) <JergerJA@Maritz.com>; Mark
>Turner (E-mail) <tur_ner@yahoo.com>; Mark Weeks (E-mail)
><marksallwet@yahoo.com>; Matt Suchland (E-mail) <Msuchland@hotmail.com>;
>Michelle (E-mail) <thieman@bright.net>; Mike Tontrup (E-mail)
><firebird@bright.net>; Nikki Mescher (E-mail) <mescher10@hotmail.com>; 'Ron
>Tenkman (E-mail) <rtenkman@hotmail.com>; Ryan Scheib (E-mail)
><rscheib@bright.net>; Steve Williams (E-mail) <ayzig@hotmail.com>; Susan
Fox
>(E-mail) <susanf@b
>Sent: Friday, November 17, 2000 5:02 AM
>Subject: FW: GREAT BUMPER STICKER
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>

 - GOre.jpg


Lets wait till Monday to send to Toby.  Looks like it should be in both critical notices and balancing section.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Studebaker, James
Sent:	Friday, January 11, 2002 3:04 PM
To:	Cady, Rachel; Lokey, Teb; Corman, Shelley; Dietz, Rick; Coon, Galen; Boatman, Jack; Nacey, Sheila; Kilmer III, Robert
Subject:	RE:  Web Site Posting for New Cash Out Pricing Provisions

Looks good to me, too.  I agree with Rachel that we should post in the critical notices and in the balancing documents section.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cady, Rachel
Sent:	Friday, January 11, 2002 2:39 PM
To:	Lokey, Teb; Corman, Shelley; Dietz, Rick; Coon, Galen; Boatman, Jack; Nacey, Sheila; Studebaker, James ; Kilmer III, Robert
Subject:	RE:  Web Site Posting for New Cash Out Pricing Provisions

Looks good to me.  I think we should post it in the critical notices and/or balancing documents section.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Paschal, Zelda   On Behalf Of Lokey, Teb
Sent:	Friday, January 11, 2002 2:28 PM
To:	Corman, Shelley; Dietz, Rick; Coon, Galen; Boatman, Jack; Cady, Rachel; Nacey, Sheila; Studebaker, James ; Kilmer III, Robert
Subject:	 Web Site Posting for New Cash Out Pricing Provisions

Please review attachment for web posting.  Will posting be critical or non-critical?

	 << File: Cash Out Web Site Notice.doc >>


Do the LM facility agreements for DevCo turbines need to contemplate ENA as
an agent?  Will it specifically be ENA, or an ENA subsidiary?

Thanks,

Kay


[IMAGE]   [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]
 		 [IMAGE]

 	 	 	For More Information Contact:
 	 	 	Bethel Nathan
 	 	 	713.524.3336
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

			   Why I Want To Go To Congress     Carroll G. Robinson, Candidate - 25th  District    The federal government must  prioritize our needs in these tight economic and uncertain times.  Congress and the President must  focus on strengthening our economy for both the short and long term.  The working men and women of  America as well as those now unemployed and underemployed must be  provided for along with incentives to help create jobs.  Our nation must maintain a strong  military and enhance homeland security, our public health system and  emergency room and trauma care system.  We must work together to improve  access to healthcare for all Americans. We must immunize all of our  children; strengthen and protect Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid;  enact into law a real Patients' Bill of Rights, Prescription Drug  Benefit; and incentives to bring into and retain more nurses in the  medical profession.  We must maintain our commitment to  access to a quality education for all Americans as a cornerstone to our  nation's strength, economic prosperity and overall quality of life.  We must have universal access to  Pre-K for all 3 and 4 year olds and every child in a public or charter  school should be provided a lap top or hand held computer from the first  day they start school. We need more teachers, smaller classes, more  construction funding and enhanced compensation for educational  professionals.  Housing, Transportation,  Environmental Protection and the Infrastructure necessary to sustain our  community must also be among our priorities.  I want to work with other elected  officials to mitigate flooding and provide more parks, libraries and  other quality of life amenities to ensure that our community remains  safe, clean, prosperous and livable.  [IMAGE]   Fort Bend County Volunteer Meeting    Fort Bend County Democratic Headquarters 2435 Texas Parkway, Suite K Missouri City, Texas Across from Wells Fargo Bank  Sunday, January 13th @ 1:30 p.m.
 		 # # # #  COMMENTS
 Post Office Box 162	 Houston, Texas 77001-0162	 713/524-3336 office	 713/524-7443 fax
 		     Pd. for by Carroll G. Robinson for Congress
 		   www.carrollgrobinson.com

			If you would like to be added or recommend  someone to receive our mailings  CLICK HERE  If you would like to be removed  CLICK HERE


Thank you for contacting Charles Schwab Signature Services.  We have received
your e-mail and will be responding to it as quickly as possible.

At Charles Schwab & Co., Inc., we strive to maintain a goal of responding to
all e-mail inquiries within 24 hours.  In order to meet this high quality
standard, we respond to customer inquiries in the order in which they are
received.

We look forward to assisting you.  Again, thank you for contacting Charles
Schwab & Co., Inc.

0099-8985


Sally,
Thank you for your continued support of Avistar.  As you probably know Brent Price has approved additional Avistar equipment for his direct reports in Houston, London and Singapore.  We will begin to install these additional desktop conferencing units within the next couple weeks.
I know we had also discussed a possible deployment to Stace and Jeff's groups.  I am in Houston this week if you would like to discuss their possible project and get a sense of the budget requirements.
Please feel free to reach me on my cell phone if you have any additional questions, 650.281.3860.
Thanks
Brian Wood
Avistar Systems
Manager, Client Development
650.610.2917 phone
650.610.2901 fax
650.632.1912 video


Thank you for submitting the following responses on the RSVP
Online Form for the 2001 Enron Law Conference. The
information you submitted is as follows:

Attendance: Y
First Name: Gerald
Last Name: Nemec
Position: Attorney
Legal Group: Enron North America Corp.
Phone: (713) 853-3512
Fax: (713) 646-3490
Email: gerald.nemec@enron.com
Admin. Name: Pat Radford
Admin. Phone: (713) 853-9282
Admin. Email: pat.radford@enron.com
Arrival Date: May 2, 2001
Departure Date: May 4, 2001
Hotel Accommodations: King Sized Bed
Non-Smoking: N
Other:
Thursday Activity: Rafting the Guadalupe River - 5 hours
with a guide to enjoy the exhilaration of San Antonio's
great river.
Golf Handicap:
Awards Dinner: Y
SAP Company: 0413
SAP Cost Center: 105659

This message is a confirmation of the details of your RSVP
form.  If any of the information is incorrect or your plans
change, e-mail Sara Davidson with the information. Do not
make any changes on the website.


Wow! I can't believe you bailed and came home!!  What possessed you to do that?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Monday, February 04, 2002 11:26 AM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

i was in new orleans all weekend but i decided to come home and watch the game because i had a bunch of money on it and there were about 20 of us going to the game so i bailed and came home. it was a fun weekend though, we went to a good party on friday that maxim threw

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Monday, February 04, 2002 11:24 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

some of it, I'm catching a cold I think, so I slept alot during it.  It made me mad too, I was all decked out in my superbowl shirt and the football stripes on my face and everything.  And to top it off, there were around 50 people at Brian's parent's house.  What about you?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Monday, February 04, 2002 11:22 AM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:

so did you watch the game


Jill Horsewell from SCE in town, will meet for lunch


Laine,

I can initial it. Please, contact Beth Perlman as an IT officer.
I shall explain the reason we are buying the software to her.

I want the software to reside in our London office - the software is used
primarily by European utilities and we shall use it as a pricing tool
in negotiations with European clients.

Vince

From: Laine Borgman@ENRON on 11/29/2000 09:29 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: D-G Energy

Vince, I am circulating the D-G Energy Software License Agreement for
signature.  I need for you or your Senior Director to initial and I also need
to know if you have identified an Enron Officer within IT to execute on
behalf of Enron Corp.  Please let me know.

Thanks,

laine


Start Date: 4/10/01; HourAhead hour: 4;  HourAhead schedule download failed.
Manual intervention required.


IEP will host a conference call on Tuesday, January 23rd at 5:00 pm Pacific
Standard Time.  Please note the call-in number and code.

Call-In#:  888-476-3757
Part. Code: 111756

Carol Hudson
Independent Energy Producers Assn.
1112 I Street, Suite 380
Sacramento, CA 95814
PH: 916-448-9499
FX: 916-448-0182
chudson@iepa.com


Steve Kean and I believe quite strongly, within a four peer group structure,  that we need to allocate somewhere between 30 and 50 percent of Gov't./ public  Affairs out of commercial support into specialized technical- there is a clear divide between individuals in the Gov't/public  Affairs groups  who are managing significant risk for the company and having a significant and  direct impact on commercial activities/ net income( these individuals should be moved to specialized technical)....and others who are performing a less strategic function( who should remain in the commercial support category). With that said, it is probably not necessary to undertake this effort for  mid-year PRC purposes since we are probably moving to a three peer stucture where that split could be achieved (for year-end purposes where the compensation impact would be felt). If we stay with the four group stucture, I intend to push hard for the remapping of Gov't Affairs by year-end.
    On a completely seperate issue, I continue to be  very concerned about the impact of the "preferred" distribution  relative to the bottom category for " commercial support" groups(I'm not implying this is'nt an issue for commercial groups- I just don't have the same ability to assess the impact there)....the concern, simply stated,  is that  it may be entirely  counterproductive to force individuals who are not performance problems  into a category that has significant implications for their careers here at Enron, particularly after going thru the past year where many of the non-performers in my group and others  were moved out of the company- the replacement costs for moving good performers out of the company for the sake of a "preferred" distribution are quite high...and that is even before you begin  to assess the incalcuable damage to morale that will invariably occour.
       Thanks.

	Enron Energy Services  From:  David W Delainey @ EES                           05/10/2001 10:26 AM

Sent by:	Kay Chapman@EES
To:	David W Delainey/HOU/EES, Philippe A Bibi/HOU/ECT, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT, Raymond Bowen/HOU/ECT, Michael R Brown/LON/ECT@ECT, Rick Buy/Enron@EnronXGate, Wes Colwell/Enron@EnronXGate, David Cox/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Janet R Dietrich/HOU/EES@EES, W David Duran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim Fallon/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Ben Glisan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Gold/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, James A Hughes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael Kopper/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron, Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Jeffrey McMahon/Enron@EnronXGate, Rob Milnthorp/CAL/ECT@ECT, Matthew Scrimshaw/LON/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES
cc:	Kenneth Lay/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cliff Baxter/HOU/ECT, James Derrick/Corp/Enron, Ken Rice/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jeff Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Richard Causey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Hannon/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Andrew S Fastow/HOU/ECT, Mark Frevert/NA/Enron, Lou L Pai/HOU/EES@EES, David Oxley/HOU/ECT, Drew C Lynch/LON/ECT@ECT, Robert W Jones/Enron@EnronXGate, Mary Joyce/Enron@EnronXGate, Marla Barnard/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Kalen Pieper/HOU/EES@EES, Gary P Smith/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Cindy Skinner/HOU/ECT, Andrea Yowman/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cindy Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Gina Corteselli/Corp/Enron, Elspeth Inglis/Corp/Enron

Subject:	PEER GROUP MAPPING

Following my note last week please find attached the consolidated peer group mapping for all business units. This mapping is intended to illustrate from a functional view point where each activity was placed at Year End 2000 VP PRC.

We were considering moving to a 3 Peer Group Structure however it as agreed at the last PRC Committee Meeting  to stay with the current structure since the data had been cleaned and everyone felt generally comfortable where most activities had been placed with the exception of just  2 or 3. It was agreed that we should concentrate on resolving these rather than undertaking an organization wide remapping excercise to consolidate to 3 Peer Groups. All functions/activities within the business units should now be reflected on the acttached.

The actions points from this excercise are:

1	to review and agree the attached mapping

2    consider and comment on highlighted groups that we have discussed in previous PRC meetings and ask for your comments or objections to moving them 	as indicated on the attachment.

3	invite your comments or questions on any other function that you consider questionable or requiring further explanation.

      Please return your comments to David Oxley by Friday May 25.

      To have this discussion now will save lengthy discussions in the final VP/MD PRC Meetings.  Definitions of the peer groups are also attached for your ease of
      reference.


Fellow Houston Tigers:

Come watch the Tigers beat up on the Bulldogs!
LSU at Mississippi State - October 20, 2001 @ 8:00pm
Chapter game watch at Woodrow's under the big tent!
(Note that parking will be available in the office building next door as
well as the normal areas - coming from Richmond, go past the office
building next to Woodrow's and take a right to get to the parking garage.
Parking is available for cars and small SUV's - due to clearance
restrictions, large vehicles are not allowed to park in the garage)

See you all there!  Geaux Tigers!
Your Greater Houston LSU Alumni Chapter
http://www.lsuhouston.com

P.S. - For those who can't make Woodrow's, Nick's place will be showing the
game as well.

______________________________________________________________________
This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential
and is the property of the Cap Gemini Ernst & Young Group.  It is intended
only for the person to whom it is addressed.  If you are not the intended
recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy,
disseminate, distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you
receive this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and
delete all copies of this message


Yes Susan sounds good to me.  let me know - and I would advise you to double check with Brennans to make sure they do still shuttle.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"susan schnitzer" <s.schnitzer@worldnet.att.net>@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, January 15, 2002 3:41 PM
To:	tammy; sandra brawner; pam anderson
Subject:	girls night

hello ladies!  our girls night is coming up  on january 24.  sandra and i talked about going to see south pacific and  having dinner at brennan (they will shuttle us back and forth from jones  hall).  the seats available on the internet are ok, so i have jon checking  at work.  does this sound like something you'd want to  do???


Hello, and happy new year!

REGARDING NEW HEALTH INSURANCE CARDS FOR 2002:
If you signed up for a new health plan, your new insurance card should be arriving at your home address.

Temporary cards for CIGNA, United Healthcare, Merck/Medco (the Enron prescription drug plan), and Metlife Dental are available at the Enron Benefits website**, http://benefits.enron.com. You will need your SSN and 4-digit PIN to access the system. (Once you are logged in, select Resources and Forms and scroll down to the desired plan.)

**PLEASE NOTE: You may also access this site for dependent care/health care and parking/mass transit spending account reimbursement forms.

If you have any questions, please let us know.

Thanks!
Your HR Team

------------------
Grace, x8321
Julie, x7404


Hi Ben,

Just wanted you to know that I received your email, and will follow through
on the change order.  I should be in the office on Thursday am, if not
sooner. As you can see, I'm picking up email, and can also be reached on my
cell phone.

I reviewed your email re: VEPCO. We do have a project entity to use, and
Accounting (and Global Finace) have been involved on the MTM and off  balance
sheet issues.  I suspect we will find out about the need for a guarantee
soon.

It was good to get your input on VEPCO. There's lots to do on that one.

Kay

Ben F Jacoby@ECT
08/07/2000 06:27 PM
Sent by: Ben Jacoby@ECT
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kathleen
Clark/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Herman Manis/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lisa Bills/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: LM6K Change Order #2 Revised

Kay and Kathy:

Please make the effective date of the change order the date of execution. I
have separately followed up on Lisa's DASH question, and we should be in a
position to execute the change order after this is clarified.

Thanks,

Ben
---------------------- Forwarded by Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT on 08/07/2000 04:38 PM
---------------------------

	From:  Lisa Bills @ ENRON                           08/07/2000 06:09 PM

To: Ben F Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Herman Manis/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Chip
Schneider/NA/Enron@Enron, Jody Pierce/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: LM6K Change Order #2 Revised

Here are my comments after reviewing the below change order: (i) the cover
page refers to an enron 2-99 deal which does not correspond to the cover page
of the executed turbine purchase contract with GE.  To what does this refer
if a different deal and if the same deal, please conform.  (ii) the effective
date is stated as March 6, 2000.  Given that the agreement between Enron and
WestLB and the purchase agreement between WestLB and GE weren't signed until
May 12, 2000, if any backdating is needed (I'd like to understand why it is
for new equipment orders), it can't be before May 12th.  With respect to the
effective date and the overall placement of the order, has this $4.65MM
acquisition been dashed?  The current effective dash only contemplated the
turbines, not any ancillary equipment.  I believe Chip Schneider is the RAC
contact for this transaction.

Regards, Lisa

Ben F Jacoby@ECT
08/07/2000 10:32 AM
Sent by: Ben Jacoby@ECT
To: Lisa Bills/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Herman Manis/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: LM6K Change Order #2 Revised

Lisa and Herman:

Please review the attached change order. We would like to have your comments
back, if any, in the next couple of days so we can execute the contract by
Friday. Let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks,

Ben
---------------------- Forwarded by Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT on 08/07/2000 08:43 AM
---------------------------
From: Kathleen Clark@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 08/07/2000 09:31 AM
To: Chris Booth/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: LM6K Change Order #2 Revised

---------------------- Forwarded by Kathleen Clark/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
08/07/2000 09:30 AM ---------------------------

	Enron Engineering & Construction Company
	From:  Kathleen Clark                           08/07/2000 09:28 AM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: LM6K Change Order #2 Revised

Kay & Scott:

Attached is a revised draft of Change Order #2 for your review.

Since the draft of 7/20/00, we have added two additional exhaust stacks at
$233,000/Unit.

Kathy
x56400


Start Date: 12/21/01; HourAhead hour: 24;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001122124.txt


Have we suggested to FERC staff that they force the ISO and PX to open the
"blackbox" to show how they determine dispatch?  In addtion, if you are not
on the distribution list for Belden's memo on utility behavior in California
this summer, I will forward it to you.  It suggests some other areas FERC
ought to be looking into.


Start Date: 1/28/02; HourAhead hour: 20;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002012820.txt


Today's IssueAlert Sponsors:

[IMAGE]

In an exclusive SCIENTECH PowerHitters interview, Envenergy President and
CEO, Ed Richards, describes an option to building owners being "held hostage"
to proprietary closed systems. The open platform concept of Envenergy is
leveraging IP to connect the complete network of building systems across an
enterprise. Read more at: www.scientech.com

Did you know that SCIENTECH offers unbiased services for:

Strategic I/T Infrastructure Design for Generation, T&D, and Retail
Operations
I/T Strategic Sourcing Consulting
Customer Care Requirements Definition
Application Selection Services
Product and Service Plans
I/T Investment Due Diligence
Secure e-mail, web and operations hosting

To learn more, please contact Jon Brock at jbrock@scientech.com or call him
at 1-505-244-7607, or toll free at 1-888-972-8676.

[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
June 21, 2001

The Southeast RTO:
The "Backstory" Behind the Press Release

By Will McNamara
Director, Electric Industry Analysis

[IMAGE]Owners of transmission systems across Alabama, Florida, Georgia,
Mississippi, and South Carolina have announced the signing of a memorandum of
understanding (MOU) to develop a regional transmission organization (RTO) for
the Southeast. A full list of the Southeast RTO members appears at the end of
this article. Two of the largest members of this new organization are
Southern Company (NYSE: SO) and Santee Cooper. If the transmission owners
prove successful in their efforts to develop this transmission entity, the
RTO would be one of the nation's largest, covering more than 39,000 miles of
transmission with an investment in assets in excess of $6 billion.

Analysis: The dynamics behind this announcement create a backstory that is
not readily available in the press materials being circulated by Southern
Company. However, the development of this much-anticipated RTO illustrates
how transmission infrastructure in the Southeast is assimilating, answers
questions about how Southern Company will comply with federal directives, and
raises speculation about possible impact on the region's already-established
RTO, GridSouth. Further, as FERC has encouraged RTOs to form across the
country, much of the commission's focus has been placed on the Southeastern
United States (along with the West). The Southeast is dominated by large IOUs
that control massive transmission assets. Thus, seeing that Southeastern
transmission systems are ultimately conjoined has been a key priority for
FERC.

You may recall that a few months ago Southern Company applied to FERC to form
its own RTO (the organization that will manage a transmission network within
a particular region). FERC rejected the SeTrans Gridco concept because
Southern Company planned to funnel certain rate incentives to companies other
than the RTO operator, which violated FERC policy. In addition, it is FERC's
general policy to consolidate operating RTOs across the country, and the
commission was concerned that Southern Company would remain too autonomous if
it was the only utility involved in a transmission entity. Thus, FERC
unequivocally told Southern Company to not re-apply for RTO status until it
had explored joining forces with neighboring companies.

Simultaneously, FERC gave conditional approval to GridSouth, an RTO formed by
Carolina Power & Light, Duke Energy and South Carolina Electric & Gas
(SCANA), Southern Company's neighbors to the north. The conditional approval
came with the instruction that GridSouth should engage in dialogue with the
SeTrans Gridco, Santee Cooper and Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) about
joining GridSouth. Again, FERC sent the message that it ultimately hopes to
see a single, large RTO serving the entire Southeast region.

Nevertheless, now Southern Company and Santee Cooper have joined forces with
seven other companies to form a new RTO that will be a completely separate
entity from GridSouth. I contacted GridSouth for a response regarding what
impact (if any) the formation of the new Southeast RTO might have on
GridSouth. However, as of press time, representatives for GridSouth had not
prepared a public statement regarding the proposed transmission entity.

I spoke with John Sell, a Southern Company spokesperson on June 19. Sell
informed me that Southern Company had indeed engaged in negotiations with
GridSouth upon FERC's directive, but determined that GridSouth was "too far
down the road" in terms of its development, and that Southern Company planned
on taking a different approach toward its transmission assets. For instance,
while both entities are for-profit operations, the new Southeast RTO plans to
hire an independent third party to oversee its operations. Further, although
the term "Southeast RTO" is being used in the press release, Sell told me
that among the companies involved the RTO is actually being referred to as
SeTrans (the name of Southern Company's rejected entity). Sell stressed that
the name SeTrans was chosen only because it had been previously established
by Southern Company and should not be seen as any indication that Southern
has majority power over the RTO. In fact, the name will be changed to
something else later this year.

On a related note, one statement that I found particularly interesting in the
press release about the new RTO is that "the companies have also made it
clear that the process is not being controlled by any individual transmission
owner, but rather all participants will help establish the rules by which
they will operate and make decisions." This is clearly a veiled reference to
Southern Company, which was criticized by FERC for being too autonomous in
its original RTO filing. When I spoke with John Sell, he volunteered that
Southern "is not the driver behind this RTO."

Santee Cooper's involvement in the SeTrans RTO also came about in a somewhat
precarious fashion. As noted, FERC specifically asked GridSouth to find a way
to incorporate Santee Cooper, a state-owned utility located in South
Carolina, into its RTO. As Santee Cooper controls about 4,200 miles of
transmission lines covering 75 percent of South Carolina, it is no wonder
that the commission would want to make sure that the public utility was
conjoined in some way to developing RTOs. There was just one problem with
this plan: the South Carolina constitution prohibits Santee Cooper from
joining for-profit enterprises.

The case was closely followed throughout the energy industry as other public
power agencies across the country are also involved in pending negotiations
to join RTOs. New reports indicate that, if the SeTrans RTO is approved by
FERC, it will be the largest RTO in the country to include a public power
entity. However, it is important to note that Desert Star, an RTO based in
Phoenix that connects transmission assets of seven Western states, includes
the Western Area Power Administration (WAPA), which owns about one-third of
the transmission system that serves Colorado and provides power to 28 of 29
of the state's municipal electric systems.

Naturally, as the SeTrans RTO is also classified as a for-profit entity, the
question has been raised of how Santee Cooper will be allowed to join as a
member given the South Carolina law. I spoke with Stephen Pelcher, associate
general counsel of rates and regulations for Santee Cooper, about this
conundrum. There is an important distinction that should be understood.
GridSouth is a wholly owned company under its three utility parents (Carolina
Power & Light, Duke and SCANA). The obstacle facing Santee Cooper's
participation in GridSouth was that the company could not be a shareholder in
a private corporation. Under the SeTrans RTO, in which Santee Cooper is now a
participant, none of the participating companies will have ownership over the
transmission entity. As noted, this was one of Southern Company's main
interests in forming its own RTO as the company intends to hire an
independent third party to oversee its operations. Pelcher told me that the
SeTrans RTO is still in a "preliminary stage" and thus it appears at this
time that participants in the SeTrans RTO will retain ownership of their
transmission assets and only turn over operational control to the independent
third party. Interestingly, Pelcher also told me that Santee Cooper (and, by
extension, the SeTrans RTO) remains in consultation with GridSouth for a
"coordination and implementation service agreement" that would in some way
interconnect the two entities.

One issue that will continue to impact RTOs throughout the country is how
electricity will be transported across independent transmission systems.
Specifically, FERC has been concerned about how power will be traded from one
RTO to another and the possibility that boundaries between two separate RTOs
could become "speed bumps" in the flow of electricity. In fact, the
commission met this week on the issue and continues to formulate policy
related to these "seam issues." Part of the reason that Southern Company's
original, independent RTO plan was rejected was FERC's concern that the
utility was resisting efforts to form a cohesive, interconnected system in
the region. At this point, it appears that FERC favors standardization in how
adjacent RTOs will relate to each other, and thus has instructed developing
RTOs to consult with each other on seam agreements. FERC reportedly is
planning to have a formal policy on the subject ready by the end of this
year. Related to the development of this policy is the debate over whether or
not FERC should take a more active role in forcing consolidation among
developing RTOs so that only a limited number of separate entities exist.

Thus, as the SeTrans RTO continues to grow, it will need to determine how it
will be connected to GridSouth and GridFlorida (and any other adjacent RTOs).
In addition, Southern Company's John Sell disclosed to me that the SeTrans
RTO has formed an MOU with TVA for a seam agreement. At this point, TVA has
made no announcement that it is planning to join the new Southeast RTO and in
fact, as a federal agency, is under no obligation to join an RTO.

The SeTrans RTO plans to file an application with FERC and is preparing for
the commission's deadline of being formed by Dec. 15 of this year. If the
SeTrans RTO (or whatever it is ultimately called) gains FERC's approval, it
will represent a significant part of the Southeast's development into a
functionally competitive electric market. If FERC's stated policy of
consolidating RTOs is effectively applied, ultimately we could see that
GridSouth becomes conjoined to this new RTO, which now includes Southern
Company, Santee Cooper and (through a seam agreement) TVA. Moreover, the
development of the new Southeastern RTO illustrates the complexities of
conjoining companies that transcend federal, state and municipal levels,
along with the challenges of ensuring that adjacent RTOs form synergistic
policies regarding the flow of power.

Members of the Southeast (SeTrans) RTO:

Alabama Electric Cooperative-generation and transmission cooperative
providing wholesale electricity to 21-member distribution systems*17 in
Alabama and four in Florida.

City of Dalton (Ga.) Utilities-full-service utility providing electric,
water, wastewater, natural gas and telecommunications services to the city of
Dalton and portions of Whitfield, Murray, Gordon, Floyd, and Catoosa counties
in Georgia.

City of Tallahassee (Fla.)&#151maintains more than 2,200 miles of
transmission and distribution lines, serving some 98,000 homes and businesses
in the Tallahassee area.

Georgia Transmission Corporation-not-for-profit cooperative owned by 39
electric membership corporations in Georgia. GTC owns approximately $910
million in assets, including more than 2,400 miles of transmission lines and
500 substations across the state.

JEA&#151Formerly known as Jacksonville Electric Authority, a municipally
owned electric supplier serving 35,000 customers in four-county area in
northeast Florida.

Municipal Electricity Authority of Georgia-joint-action state authority
providing wholesale electric generation and transmission to 48 city- or
county-owned electric systems in Georgia.

Santee Cooper&#151South Carolina's state-owned electric and waste water
utility and the state's largest seller of power. The utility is the direct
and indirect source of power for 1.6 million South Carolinians and maintains
4,223 miles of transmission lines.

South Mississippi Electric Power Association-non-profit wholesale electric
power cooperative serving the power requirements of the 350,000 retail
customers of its 11-member distribution cooperatives in the state of
Mississippi.

Southern Company-super-regional energy company with more than 32,000 MW of
electric generating capacity in the Southeast and 26,000 miles of
transmission lines.

An archive list of previous IssueAlerts is available at
www.scientech.com

[IMAGE]
The most comprehensive, up-to-date map of the North American Power System by
RDI/FT Energy is now available from SCIENTECH.
Reach thousands of utility analysts and decision makers every day. Your
company can schedule a sponsorship of IssueAlert by contacting Nancy Spring
via e-mail or calling (505)244-7613. Advertising opportunities are also
available on our website.
SCIENTECH is pleased to provide you with your free,  daily IssueAlert. Let us
know if we can help you with  in-depth analyses or any other SCIENTECH
information  products. If you would like to refer a colleague to receive our
free,  daily IssueAlerts, please reply to this email and include  their full
name and email address or register directly on our site.

If you no longer wish to receive this daily e-mail, send a message to Issue
Alert, and include the word "delete" in the subject line.
SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts(SM) are compiled based on the  independent analysis
of SCIENTECH consultants. The opinions expressed in  SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts
are not intended to predict financial performance  of companies discussed, or
to be the basis for investment decisions of any  kind. SCIENTECH's sole
purpose in publishing its IssueAlerts is to offer  an independent perspective
regarding the key events occurring in the  energy industry, based on its
long-standing reputation as an expert on  energy issues.

Copyright 2001. SCIENTECH, Inc. All rights  reserved.


Kay:

Attached please find revised copies of the LLC Agreement and Letter
Agreement that are marked to show the changes that we have made to Paul
Hasting's drafts of the same.  As I will be out of the office tomorrow,
please let John know if you have any additional changes so that he may send
the documents to Marguerite by mid-morning.  Thanks!

-Marisa

 <<2XN4RED.DOC>>   <<2XN3RED.DOC>>

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

 - 2XN4RED.DOC
 - 2XN3RED.DOC


with Travis McCullough


Mark,  Attached is a draft.  Please review and let's discuss before you send to Huber.


The West Gas Desk built up a negative imbalance on Citizen's TA
(Transportation Agreement) 97ZH.  Citizens purchased 23,175 MMBtu to apply to
this imbalance.  For the May invoice, we need to subtract this amount from
usage.  Enter the volume into the area where we show transportation by others
to the citygate.  This is logical as we otherwise would have to transport
this gas in ourselves.

After this trade, the TA imbalance on 97ZH will be 30,688 MMBtu.  ENA is
responsible for this imbalance.  It is my understanding that future
imbalances will go to the 97ZH OBA rather than the TA.  Therefore, this
current TA imbalance will be there until it is eliminated.

Call me with any questions.

Chris


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 10/04/2000 12:10
PM ---------------------------

Jerry W Germany <germanj@basf-corp.com> on 09/20/2000 08:43:11 AM
To: Chris.Germany@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Re: Thursday Night

No, I'm not buying.   I reviewed my credit card receipts this week and I
bought
last.  Yawl's turn.

Don has brought me lots of checks, one for $1800 on farm equipment, $3000 from
Gerald for cows, (I think we are suppose to hold this check) and $5900 for
selling the cows.   You want me to hold this till we talk Thursday night.  I
have the checks in my Freezer on ice so they will not be hot.   I can
continue t
hold or deposit into the account.   Your call Bub.  Also have some on Dad's
mail
that Don dropped off.

Barb and I will be going up Friday to Alto to check out the place, mow and
weed
eat etc.   I'll grab the mail and I have Don's check for $10,000 to Mary.
I'll
probably go by and drop flowers on Dad's grave.

How was your trip?  Did you miss me?   You by a motorcycle YET?   I have not
really looked yet.   Sold the four wheeler to Don for $4000 plus the trailer.
I did not really need it and he asked if I wanted to sell it.

Got the insurance check from Met Life.   I signed it and put my account # on
it
to deposit after church Sunday morning.  Stuck it and my offering check in my
wallet.  They took up the offering so I pulled out my check and put it in the
offering plate.  When I handed the offering plate to the usher, I noticed
writing on my check, then it hit me, WRONG CHECK.   Barb said my face turned
dark purple and eyes looked like watermelons.    I was stammering, wait wait,
wrong check!   Whooo, that was a close one.   Thought you might enjoy that
one.

Hey Dow stock is an excellent buy at $24.00.   If we do not buy a scooter
soon,
I'm going to invest a little in the Dow Stock.

Talk to you this afternoon once you are settled back in.  See Ya

Chris.Germany@enron.com on 09/20/2000 08:21:59 AM
To:   WDGERMANYJR, Jerry W Germany
cc:
Subject:  Re: Thursday Night

Jerry, this may be news to you.  I would like for the 3 of us to have
dinner Thursday evening and you are buying.

Comments - questions?


It may be the first email but I gave this to Sam at our legal/credit meeting
last week.  She was going to wait for the meeting with Cassandra for approval
and signature (which was postponed).  But we can't postpone responding to the
request.  Sara

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	Cheryl Nelson@ENRON
	Sent by: Cheryl Nelson@ENRON
	01/12/2001 09:12 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Authorized Signers

I think that this is the first time I am hearing about this email?  did I
miss something?  Let me know.  in any case, I will get to it right away.
Thanx.

	Sara Shackleton@ECT
	01/12/2001 08:32 AM

		 To: Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron, Cheryl Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Authorized Signers

As a general proposition, I need to be advised of the activity on Gary's
desk.  Please let me know if you have responded to Sheila.  I think the
request is about two weeks old.  Sara

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 01/12/2001 08:20 AM -----

	Sheila Glover
	01/11/2001 12:47 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: John Greene/LON/ECT@ECT, Israel Estrada/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Aneela
Charania/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Authorized Signers

Sara and Samantha,
When will ECT Investments be signed so we can send an updated copy to our
Prime brokers?
Thanks. Sheila
---------------------- Forwarded by Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT on 01/11/2001 12:41
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Sheila Glover                           01/03/2001 10:17 AM

To: William Patrick Lewis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michelle D Cisneros/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Gary Hickerson/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Greene/LON/ECT@ECT, Michael W
Bradley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Aneela Charania/HOU/ECT@ECT, Theresa T
Brogan/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Authorized Signers

Patrick and Michelle,
We added both of you to the list for Authorized Signers for ECT Investments,
Inc.  for transfer of funds.  Authorization requires one commercial and one
commercial support signature.
Thanks. Sheila

Current Authorized Signers for transfer of funds for ECT Investments, Inc.
are M. Bradley, J. Greene, G. Hickerson, P. Lewis and M. Ruch.


no interest. thanks.


ok so i will talk to you tomorrow?


Sharon, are they going to move the frig to 42?  Thanks. Lynn

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Brown, Sharon
Sent:	Friday, September 28, 2001 10:21 AM
To:	Adams, Jean; Barry, Patrick; Benningfield, Robert; Blair, Jean; Bodnar, Michael; Bryan, Randy; Buchanan, John; Callans, Nancy; Carr, James; Clapper, Karen; Forbish, Sherry; Giambrone, Laura; Greaney, Chris; Hernandez, Bert; Hibbard, Scott; Janzen, Randy; Kowalke, Terry; Linhart, Joe; McDaniel, Janet; McEvoy, Christine; Miller, Beverly; Miller, Chris L; Minter, Tracy; Mulligan, Amy; Perry, Renee; Porter, Diana; Scurlock, Debra; Sturr, Kathy; Vaughan, Cara; Walden, Shirley; Ward, Linda; Washington, Kathy; Wilkens, Jerry; Woodson, Harry; Bastida, Nancy; Berger, Larry; Brostad, Karen; Brown, Elizabeth; Carter, Zuela; Cormier, Martha; Dasilva, Esther; Davis, Larry; Eldridge, Dale; Hanagriff, Richard; Johnson, Alice; Lee, Dennis; Lindley, Hilda; Steele, Patricia; Trevino, Linda; Vasquez, Josue; Wagoner, Michael; Zadow, Raetta; Aldinger, William; Collins, Marion; Coon, Galen; Cooper, Tim; Cramer, Lanny; Howard, Jack; Laferla, Lynda ; Phillips, Mary; Rivers, Cynthia; Betancourt, Ramona ; Black, Legale ; Draemer, Mary ; Jaquet, Tammy; Kuehl, Toby; Matheson, Maggie; Medeles, Gerry; Studebaker, James
Cc:	Blair, Lynn; Bryant, Mike; Corman, Shelley; Dietz, Rick; Holmes, Bradley; January, Steven; Nacey, Sheila; Scott, Donna; Carrillo, Alma; Garcia, Ava; Green, Alma; Winters, Ricki
Subject:	RE: ETS - 41st Floor Relocations

Now would be a good time to remove any items from the refrigerators on 41.  There are only about 10 people left on 41 and there's still enough food and/or containers left here to feed a small country.  When everyone moves next week anything left in the refrigerator is history!
slb
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Brown, Sharon
Sent:	Tuesday, September 18, 2001 2:11 PM
To:	Adams, Jean; Barry, Patrick; Benningfield, Robert; Blair, Jean; Bodnar, Michael; Bryan, Randy; Buchanan, John; Callans, Nancy; Carr, James; Clapper, Karen; Forbish, Sherry; Giambrone, Laura; Greaney, Chris; Hernandez, Bert; Hibbard, Scott; Janzen, Randy; Kowalke, Terry; Linhart, Joe; McDaniel, Janet; McEvoy, Christine; Miller, Beverly; Miller, Chris L; Minter, Tracy; Mulligan, Amy; Perry, Renee; Porter, Diana; Scurlock, Debra; Sturr, Kathy; Vaughan, Cara; Walden, Shirley; Ward, Linda; Washington, Kathy; Wilkens, Jerry; Woodson, Harry; Bastida, Nancy; Berger, Larry; Brostad, Karen; Brown, Elizabeth; Carter, Zuela; Cormier, Martha; Dasilva, Esther; Davis, Larry; Eldridge, Dale; Hanagriff, Richard; Johnson, Alice; Lee, Dennis; Lindley, Hilda; Steele, Patricia; Trevino, Linda; Vasquez, Josue; Wagoner, Michael; Zadow, Raetta; Aldinger, William; Collins, Marion; Coon, Galen; Cooper, Tim; Cramer, Lanny; Howard, Jack; Laferla, Lynda ; Phillips, Mary; Rivers, Cynthia; Betancourt, Ramona ; Black, Legale ; Draemer, Mary ; Jaquet, Tammy; Kuehl, Toby; Matheson, Maggie; Medeles, Gerry; Studebaker, James
Cc:	Blair, Lynn; Bryant, Mike; Corman, Shelley; Dietz, Rick; Holmes, Bradley; January, Steven; Nacey, Sheila; Scott, Donna; Carrillo, Alma; Garcia, Ava; Green, Alma; Winters, Ricki
Subject:	ETS - 41st Floor Relocations

As you are well aware all of the ETS groups located on the 41st floor will be relocated beginning this week and through part of next week.  Just a reminder, remove any food and/or containers that you have  in  either of the refrigerators in the 41st kitchen.  After 41 is vacated facilities department (a.k.a. hazardous waste) will be called to clean the refrigerator and dispose of all items left behind.

Sharon Brown
ETS Gas Control
713-853-5660


I have problems sending things to you and Mike.

Jeffrey Porter@NEWPOWER
02/01/2001 07:19 AM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Weird Email

were you trying to send me something yesterday?

----- Forwarded by Jeffrey Porter/HOU/NewPower on 02/01/01 07:18 AM -----

	Laura Rosener
	01/31/01 05:04 PM

		 To: Jeffrey Porter/HOU/NewPower@NewPower
		 cc:
		 Subject: was this meant for you?

It had an incorrect address.

Thanks!
Laura Rosener
The New Power Company
(713) 345-8053 Pager- (877) 792-5092
Laura.Rosener@newpower.com

----- Forwarded by Laura Rosener/HOU/NewPower on 01/31/01 05:03 PM -----

From: Chris.Germany@enron.com
Recipients: Chris.Germany@enron.com
Date: 03:30:47 PM Today
State:  DEAD

Failure Report:
Intended Recipient: jeffery.porter@newpower.com
Failure Reason: User jeffery.porter (jeffery.porter@newpower.com) not listed
in public Name & Address Book
Dead Failure Reason: User Chris.Germany (Chris.Germany@enron.com) not listed
in public Name & Address Book


Fernley - attached as discussed, initial gas & power operating standards for
Houston.  We will use these as a basis for comparison with other offices and
ultimately the development of global standards across the company.

Sally - you may have seen these already but I wanted to make sure you had a
copy.

Call me with any questions or comments.


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 02/29/2000 02:24
PM ---------------------------

Chris Germany
01/31/2000 11:47 AM
To: Susan W Pereira/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan Junek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kate Fraser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robin Barbe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrea
Ring/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jared Kaiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen D McIlvoy/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Scott E Hendrickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah Mulholland/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dick
Jenkins/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Index worksheets

Hi team.  Guess what day it is??!!

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 01/31/2000 11:46
AM ---------------------------

Chris Germany
12/30/99 12:16 PM
To: Susan W Pereira/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan Junek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kate Fraser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robin Barbe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrea
Ring/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jared Kaiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen D McIlvoy/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Scott E Hendrickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah Mulholland/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Index worksheets

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 12/30/99 12:16
PM ---------------------------

Chris Germany
11/23/99 08:34 PM
To: Susan W Pereira/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan Junek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kate Fraser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robin Barbe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrea
Ring/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jared Kaiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen D McIlvoy/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Scott E Hendrickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah Mulholland/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Index worksheets

Hey team!  I probably won't be here when these are due.  After you finish
working on the sheet, print one copy for Kim Brown.

Thanks :)


In addition, make sure we understand the steam obligation and it's effect on dispatch flexibity and heat rate.  It appears the 8000 Heat Rate is assuming above market steam sales are buying down the heat rate.   Solar turbines in combined cycle (without a steam sale credit) would usually have a heat rate around 10,000 Btu/kwh.

The lower heat rate is probably predicated on providing 24 hour steam, which means less dispatch flexibility and producing off-peak energy at a loss.

Make sure we are modeling these dynamics properly.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Herndon, Rogers
Sent:	Friday, June 15, 2001 8:40 AM
To:	Morse, Brad
Cc:	Bernstein, Mark; Virgo, Robert; Presto, Kevin M.; Ader, Jeff; Misra, Narsimha; Dietrich, Janet
Subject:	York Generation Valuation

Brad -

Some items we need to make sure we are addressing in this valuation analysis:

Fixd Costs and O&M:
Property Taxes
Gross Receipts Tax
Franchise Tax
Firm Transport Costs - Demand Charges (Full Basis in outer years)
Operations
Service Fees associated with any wholesale dispatch (Lloyd's group)

Heat Rates & Other Variable Issues
What is the Heat Rate Assumption during CT and CC mode and has Bob Virgo confirmed this?
Degradation factors
Recent Historical Run Times and awhen we would provide on-site live verification tests
Emmissions limitations
NG Intra-Day Premiums

Bob - I would like to get any information that you have that will be necessary to complete this evaluation.
Brad - I would like to discuss where you are in this process sometime befor the day is over.

Thanks,
Rogers


Kim,
 I received the documents late yesterday.  I am in the process of comparing
the hard copy to the marked up version we have been working with.  Once I
finish, I will forward the two originals of the guaranty document to Enron
Corp for their review and execution.  Once I receive it back, I will let you
know.  I will forward two copies of the contract document to the deal contact
for that departments review.  Likewise, I will let you know when it has been
signed.  I cannot at this time tell you when this may be.
 If you need quicker turnaround, we might consider counterpart execution
which would permit the documents to be signed simultaneously by WPSC.
 Why are you requesting an original signed copy for the consultant.  A copy
should be sufficient. Don't you agree.

	"Kim Decell" <kdecell@gassupplyconsulting.com>
	12/15/2000 03:35 PM

		 To: <Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: WPSC contract

Dan-

Please confirm that you have received the executable copies of the Wisconsin
Public Service contracts and Enron Corp guarantees.

Also, could you please give me an estimated date that Enron will mail the
partially executed contracts and executed guarantees to WPSC?  We would
appreciate them being sent by overnight mail.

Thanks,
Kim

Gas Supply Consulting, Inc.
(281)558-0735
kdecell@gassupplyconsulting.com


Let me know how this turns out.  If you need a contact, let me know.

Also, everyone should be aware about an aggregation project under Phyllis Anzalone.  EES legal has found a loophole to the time restrictions on electricity contracts and the appropriations risk that we need to check out.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Twiggs, Thane
Sent:	Tuesday, August 21, 2001 5:48 AM
To:	Nicolay, Christi L.
Cc:	Ryall, Jean; Steffes, James D.; Lindberg, Susan
Subject:	RE:

I will.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nicolay, Christi L.
Sent:	Monday, August 20, 2001 2:25 PM
To:	Twiggs, Thane
Cc:	Ryall, Jean; Steffes, James D.; Lindberg, Susan
Subject:

Thane -- Doug said that the TX PUC staff was asking about an EES contract at the meeting you all had in Austin last week.  Can you please find the appropriate EES lawyer to follow up on this?  (You may want to call Jim Steffes about what was asked.)  Thanks.


Bill Hogan will convey to you are strong concern over the unnecessary
criticism of the Governor, on page 4 of the Summary,  Assuming this is
removed/fixed, I would like to be included as a supporter.

I have two or three other minor "fixes" where the current text could be
read as inconsistent with the main points in the Manifesto.  See attached.

Regards,
John Chandley

(See attached file: Manifesto-final version -- jc edits.doc)

William W. Hogan
John F. Kennedy School of Government
Harvard University
79 John F. Kennedy Street
Cambridge, MA 02138
617-495-1317 (o)
617-495-1635 (f)
email: william_hogan@harvard.edu
web page: www.whogan.com
or
http://ksgwww.harvard.edu/people/whogan

David Teece <teece@Haas.Berkeley.EDU> on 01/24/2001 11:56:11 AM

To:   tyson@haas.berkeley.edu, tom_campbell@law.stanford.edu,
      shmuel@euler.berkeley.edu, willrichm@aol.com, george_barker@lecg.com,
      cdanner@wilkandassociates.com, gilbert@econ.berkeley.edu,
      scott_harvey@lecg.com, jscadding@wilkandassociates.com,
      spiller@haas.berkeley.edu, mwilk@wilkandassociates.com,
      phillip_mcleod@lecg.com, berk@haas.berkeley.edu,
      john_chandley@lecg.com, jdasovic@enron.com,
      lfried@uclink.berkeley.edu, william_hogan@harvard.edu,
      rmichaels@fullerton.edu, richard.rumelt@anderson.ucla.edu,
      rschmidt@lecg.com, pverleger@compuserve.com,
      joseph.mullinix@ucop.edu, steven@stoft.com
cc:   peter.gosselin@latimes.com

Subject:  Final Version-Manifesto

TO:?? Colleagues

SUBJECT:? Final Version

I've done my best to include your very helpful comments.? The document now
also contains a summary.

I would like your endorsement, by noon PST (Wednesday) if possible.? A
number of you have already indicated you would sign it.? Also, Tom Campbell
has indicated he will try to recruit Ken Arrow.? I believe one of you
agreed to recruit Dan McFadden.? Laura is working on Larry Summers.? Solow
would be a great addition, too.

Can we agree on the following division of labor from here out:

1.? Recruiting others:? All

2.? Media representatives:? Campbell, Tyson, Spiller, Verlerger, Wilk,
Teece, and Hogan (This is by no means meant to preclude anyone contacting
the media after we go public.)

??? On media, we are giving the LA Times a 24-hour exclusive.? We won't
release to other media sources until 9:00 AM Thursday.

Many thanks for your involvement and endorsements.

(See attached file: Manifesto-final version.doc)
======================================
David J. Teece, Director
Institute of Management, Innovation and Organization
F402 Haas School of Business #1930
University of California, Berkeley
Berkeley, CA  94720-1930
Phone:  (510) 642-1075
Fax:  (510) 642-2826
http://haas.berkeley.edu/~imio
======================================

 - Manifesto-final version -- jc edits.doc
 - Manifesto-final version.doc


BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTS

Weather Group
On Wednesday, December 6th, The Weather Channel aired an episode of their
show "Atmospheres," which included a fifteen minute segment focusing on
Enron's Weather Risk Management business.  Mark Tawney, Steven Vu, Gary
Taylor, and Steve Bennett were featured.  The Weather Channel has aired the
episode periodically since then.  The parts that make it through the Enron
cutting room floor will be coming soon to an elevator near you!  If you would
like to view a copy of the episode in its entirety, please contact Yvette
Simpson at ext. 3-9595.

The Weather Risk Management group completed the first ever Power Demand
transaction this week.  The transaction was a swap based on the PJM demand
index.  Power Demand contracts use average peak power demand as an index and
allow power market participants (generators, btu distributors, marketers,
etc...) to mitigate volumetric exposures.  Weekly swaps are available on
EnronOnline and the desk has placed option contracts on this index in the
broker market.  Inquiries regarding this product should be directed to
Claudio Ribeiro, product manager ext. 3-7313, Gary Taylor ext. 3-1511, or
Valter Stoiani ext. 3-6906.

West Power Trading
It,s been a wild and crazy holiday season in the West.  Electricity prices
have remained extremely bullish throughout the entire WSCC, due in large part
to below-normal temperatures, &less than stellar8 river flows in the
Northwest and Northern California, tremendously volatile natural gas prices,
and a number of generating plants down for both planned and unplanned
maintenance.  Recently, the Federal Regulatory Energy Commission (FERC) has
stepped in to implement several orders in an effort to try to correct this
&extremely flawed market.8  Stay tuned sports fans; some have the feeling
that the best is yet to come.

HAPPY HOLIDAYS
Seasons Greetings from ENA PR.  The EnTouch newsletter will be on holiday
break next week.  If you have information for future issues of EnTouch,
please send it to Michelle Vitrella.  We hope you have a wonderful and safe
holiday.  See you next year!

WELCOME

New Hires ENA/EIM/EGM
ENA ) Kimberly Hardy, Adam Johnson, Daniel Lisk, William Fleenor, Stacey
Wales, Jason Fischer, Aparna Rajaram

LEGAL STUFF

The information contained in this newsletter is confidential and proprietary
to Enron Corp. and its subsidiaries.  It is intended for internal use only
and should not be disclosed.


I will be out of the office this Thursday and Friday (7-13/14) to attend a
congestion reform meeting at the Cal iso in Sacramento. I will be reachable
by cell phone if necessary.

Bob